State of Connecticut PUBLIC DOCUMENT No. 18 THIRTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SECRETARY PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE LEGISLATURE Partford Press The Case, Lockwood & Brainard Company 1905 State of Connecticut PUBLIC DOCUMENT No. 18 THIRTY-EIGHTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE SECRETARY. OF THE Connecticut Board of Agriculture 1904 PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE LEGISLATURE Partford Press The Case, Lockwood & Brainard Company 1905 To His ExXcCELLENCY ABIRAM CHAMBERLAIN Governor of Connecticut : In accordance with the provisions of an act creating the State Board of Agriculture, | have the honor to submit herewith the Report for the year ending December 31, 1904. JAMES F. BROWN, Secretary. NORTH STONINGTON, December 31, 1904. STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. His Excettency ABIRAM CHAMBERLAIN, ex officio. 1903-1904. APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR AND SENATE. CHARLES L. TuTTLe, James F. Brown, CHARLES E. CHAPMAN, IvERSON C, FANToN, Term Expires Hartford, North Stonington,” . Westbrook, Westport, . APPOINTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY. Hartford County, . New Haven County, New London County, Fairfield County, . Windham County, Litchfield County, . Middlesex County, Tolland County, GOVERNOR ABIRAM CHAMBERLAIN, President ex officio. EpwIin G. SEELEY, JAMes F. Brown, Cuas. A. THOMPSON, Dr. E. H. JENKINS, Dr. G. P. CLintron, Dr. W. E. BriTTOon, INES PEA Nac SEAMAN MEAD EpmunpD HAa.taDAy, Suffield, . D. WALTER PatrTeNn, North Haven, James B. Parmer, Jewett City, SEAMAN MEap, Greenwich, N. G. Wiv.iams, Brooklyn, Epwin G. SEeELEy, Roxbury, . W. L. Davis, Durham Center, CHARLES A, THOMPSON, Melrose, . OFFICERS OF THE BOARD. 1905 1905 1907 1907 1905 1905 1g05 1905 1907 1907 1907 1907 Roxbury, Vice-Prestdent. North Stonington, Secretary. Melrose, Treasurer. New Haven, Chemist. New Haven, Botanist. New Haven, Entomologist. New Haven, Pomologist. Auditors. D. WALTER PATTEN Cuas. E. CHAPMAN. - Ret ORT: AGRICULTURAL FAIRS IN CONNECTICUT, 1904. Delegate. | Name. C. E. Chapman Seaman Mead J. C. Fanton ¢. L. Tuttle C. A. Thompson W. L. Davis J. F. Brown FE. G. Seeley D. W. Patten E. Halladay Seaman Mead C, E. Chapman I. C. Fanton J. F. Brown E. G. Seeley . A. Thompson . Williams . Palmer . Tuttle . Davis . Williams AS “B. Palmer C. A. Thompson D. W. Patten =Zgouzor Porn a: Seaman Mead J. F. Brown N. G. Williams D. W. Patten W, L. Davis E. Halladay New London County Windham County Beacon Valley Berlin Branford Chester Colchester Grange Danbury Farmington Valley Granby Guilford Harwinton New Milford Newtown Orange Simsbury Stafford Springs Suffield Union (Monroe, etc.) Union (Somers, etc.) Woodstock Wolcott Conn. Pom. Society Greenfield Country Club New Haven Co. Hort. So. Putnam Park Association Rockville Fair Associat’n Waterbury Driving Co. The Horseshoe Park Ag- ricultural Association Place. Date. Secretary. Norwich Sept. 13-15 |T. W. Yerrington Brooklyn Sept. 6-8 J. B. Stetson Naugatuck Oct. 13 Wm. L. Lloyd Berlin Sept. 21, 22 |W. W. Christian Branford Sept. 27-30 |J. P. Callahan Chester Sept. 27 Edgar W. Lewis Colchester Oct. 6 C. E. Staples Danbury Oct. 3-8 G. M. Rundle Collinsville Sept. 7, 8 E. A. Hough Granby Sept. 28, 29 |C. H. Deming Greenfield Hill/Sept. 20-22 |Mrs. D. B. Adams Guilford Sept. 28 Robert De F. Bristol Harwinton Octy4 Lewis O. Catlin Torrington New Haven _|Nov. 8, 9, 10 |Patrick Keane New Milford |Sept. 13-16 |J. E. Hungerford Newtown Sept. 27-29 |R. C. Mitchell Orange Sept. 5, 6, 7 |A. D. Clark Putnam Aug.30, Sep.1/A. D. McIntyre Rockville Sept. 27-29 |H. D. Noble Simsbury Oct. George C. Eno Stafford Spr’gs|Oct. 4-6 C. F. Beckwith Suffield Oct. 4,5 A. F. Warner Huntington |Sept. 21, 22 |S. T. Palmer Shelton Somers Sept. 21 M. Hamilton Ellington Waterbury Sept. 20-22 |N. W. Heater Pequabuck Willimantic |Sept. 20-22 |T.R. Sadd So. Woodstock|Sept. r2-14_ |L. H. Healey, N. W. Wolcott Oct. 12 . E. M. Upson Conn. Dairymen’s Asso’n| Hartford Rockville Jan. 3d week|J. B. Noble Sept. 27, 29 Hartford H. C. C. Miles Milford 8 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., FARMERS’ INSTITUTES IN 1904. The following extract is from the last annual report of the Board: “The plan of conducting Farmers’ Institutes which was early adopted by the Board of Agriculture, and has long been followed, was to submit a list of speakers and subjects to the Granges, Farmers’ Clubs, Agricultural Societies, and others interested in rural pursuits throughout the State, and invite these local organizations to select the date and the speaker best suited to the convenience and supposed needs of the locality. The expense of speakers and advertising under this plan was borne by the Board of Agriculture, and Institutes were held as far as practicable wherever desired. “ Following established custom at the opening of the year under review an attractive list of speakers and subjects, which appears in the last annual report, was widely distributed, and in response to invitations Institutes were held in various parts of the State, with results that were helpful and stimulating. “In the meantime the Dairymen’s Association and Pomo- logical Society, representing the two leading agricultural inter- ests of the State, were each conducting Institutes along its special line of work, and these lines frequently overlapped each other and even more frequently were found to blend with the more general agricultural interests of the State. “ While this independent action has been entirely free from even the suspicion of any friction, it has been attended with what Dr. Jenkins well characterizes as ‘a good deal of lost motion,’ and it has long been felt that some more economical plan should be adopted. “Accordingly, at the opening of the Institute season of 1903- 04, a conference was held at Hartford by the Committee of the Board of Agriculture on Farmers’ Institutes, with similar committees from the Dairymen’s Association and Pomological J 1905. | FARMERS’ INSTITUTES IN 1904. 9 Society, and after a full and free interchange of views the sec- retaries of the three organizations were elected a committee to cooperate in the conduct of Institutes for the coming year. “This committee has entered upon its duties in the confident expectation that the results will fully justify the change that has been made. “Tt must never be forgotten, however, that no system of Institute work can be successful that does not include the codp- eration and hearty support of the local community in* which and for which it is held. We, therefore, invite all who are interested in up-to-date methods to lend a hand in promoting the work of Farmers’ Institutes throughout the State.” Pursuant to the plan above outlined an average of at least three Institutes was held in each county in the State, with results that seemed to fully justify the new method which had been adopted. In order further to promote the work of Farmers’ Institutes the Board of Agriculture, at a meeting held in New Haven May 11th, elected Prof. L. A. Clinton, Director of Storrs Ex- periment Station, a delegate to represent the Board at the annual meeting of the American Association of Farmers’ Insti- tute Workers to be held at St. Louis, Oct. 18-20, 1904. Prof. Clinton attended the convention, and the following report and suggestions have been received from him. So far as applica- ble to our conditions I trust these suggestions may prove help- ful in promoting this important work. Storrs AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION. Storrs, Conn., November 4, 1904. Cot. JAMEs F. Brown, North Stonington, Conn. My Dear Col. Brown: I wrote you a few days ago and promised to report to you concerning the convention of Farmers’ Institute workers held at St. Louis, and in accordance with that promise I submit the following report. fo) BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., The convention was attended by Farmers’ Institute workers representing every section of the country. The most marked feature of the convention was the reports upon the way Insti- tutes are organized in some of the States. In the reports from Minnesota, Illinois, and Michigan, and some of the other States as well, and especially Canada, we find that they are thoroughly organized, and that in each county they have their standing Farmers’ Institute committee. This committee has charge of securing the hall for the Institute, of advertising the Institute, and in, seeing that all the local arrangements are made. ‘This local committee is a permanent one and holds over from year to year, and care is taken that this committee is selected from the most prosperous farmers in the county; men whose word carries weight, and whose connection with the Institute would impress the other farmers of the county of the quality of: the work which would probably be done by the Institute. It was made evident that in order to carry out a campaign of Farmers’ Institute work as it should be carried out there should be one man who should make it a special duty to arrange for the Inst1- tutes, to arrange for the speakers, who can, even during the summer, be on the lookout for men who are making a success of their work on the farm and get these men to come to the Institute the next winter and tell other farmers how they do it. The most successful Farmers’ Institute worker is, probably, the one who has made a success on his own farm, and a man in whom the farmers of his county have confidence. One feature of the Farmers’ Institute work which I find has been developed in many of the States, and one which has been almost entirely neglected in Connecticut, is the special educa- tional work for the women of the farm. In Ontario and Ilhi- nois as well as in Minnesota this side of the work has been thor- oughly developed. The women have their special lecturers, or one session of the Institute is given over to work which has to do with the household, such as improvements in cooking, the proper ration to feed children, etc. It is found that not only the farmers’ wives and daughters eagerly embrace the oppor- tunity afforded for this instruction, but the women of the city are coming to attend these Institutes, and both realize that they can get great good from the meetings. Thus there is being a bond established between the women of the city and the women of the country, and an opportunity is given to them to exchange ideas, and both are improved thereby. 1905. | FARMERS’ INSTITUTES IN 1904. II One of the most remarkable examples of the good results from Farmers’ Institute work is found in Ontario. A few years ago the farmers there were engaged in growing products for shipment to the American markets. When the American tariff wall was raised the agricultural interests were completely stunned for a time. The attention of the farmers was, how- ever, called to the profits in the production of bacon, and they were given information as to the foreign demand for this prod- uct and a new industry has been built up. This has largely resulted from the general dissemination of information through Farmers’ Institute methods. The agricultural college of the State has a work to do which no other institution can do, and yet in the dissemination of popular agricultural information the Farmers’ Institute does a work which the agricultural college cannot do. I should like to see Canaeettri one of the leading states in Farmers’ Institute work. It is not at present. With our limited area and the facilities for reaching various points in the State, I can see no good reason why we should not have this State thoroughly organized in Farmers’ Institute work. As the great western States have organized by counties we might organize by townships; or, if it seems wiser at first to organize by counties, I believe that we could find three or five wide-awake farmers in every county who would be willing to serve as an Institute committee. These farmers are well acquainted with the needs of the locality, and would be able to secure an attendance at the Institute which could not be secured in any other way. I recommend to you and through you to the Board that an effort be made to place the Farmers’ Institute work in this State on a little more systematic basis than it has been in the past. The needs of the various localities of the state should be carefully studied, and then speakers should be brought to these localities who can give special information along the lines where information is needed! Yours very truly, eA CLIN LON. AGRICULTURAL CONVENTION AT HARTFORD. The annual midwinter meeting of the Board of Agriculture was held in Unity Hall, Hartford, Dec. 14, 15, and 16, 1904, in accordance with the following programme. Owing to a severe blizzard which prevailed at the time, the attendance was less than usual, but the stenographer has preserved a full record of the addresses and discussions, and it is hoped that these will not be lost by the thousands of our farmers all over the State to whom copies of this report will be sent. A part of the fine agricultural exhibit of the State at the Louisiana Purchase Exposition was returned in time to be shown at the convention and was highly commended. The Connecticut Agricultural College, as well as both the Experiment Stations, presented valuable exhibits along the lines of instruction and investigation in which they are engaged. Prof. Gully of the Agricultural College made an extensive exhibit of fruit from the cold storage plant of the college, which attracted much attention. A full list of exhibits, pre- pared by Mr. N. S. Platt, Pomologist of the Board, will be found at the close of the report of the convention. PROGRAM ME. Wednesday, December 14th. 10.30 A.M. INVOCATION. Rev. Rockwell Harmon Potter. ADDRESS OF WELCOME. His Honor Wm. F. Henney, Mayor of Hartford. RESPONSE BY His Excellency Abiram Chamberlain, Governor of Connecticut. 14 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [ Jan., 11.00 A.M. AppRESS —‘‘ The Country Boy.” By President F. S. Luther, Trinity College. 1.30 P.M. ANNUAL MEETING OF THE CONNECTICUT SHEEP BREEDERS’ ASSOCIATION. 2.00 P.M. INTRODUCTORY ADDRESS. By Mr. F. H. Stadtmueller, President Connecticut Sheep Breeders’ Association. 2.15 P.M. ADDRESS — “ Sheep.” By Mr. L. B. Harriss, Lyndonville, Vermont. 3.00 P.M. AppRESS — “ Money in Lambs.” By Mr. Joseph E. Wing, Mechanicsburg, Ohio. DISCUSSION. 7.30 P.M. AppRESS — “ Observations in the Orient.” Illustrated with Stereopticon. By Hon. E. J. Hill, Norwalk. Thursday, December 15th. 10.00 A.M. AppRESS —“ Reserve Power in Housekeeping.” By Miss Martha Van Rensselaer, Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. II.00 A.M. ADDRESS —“ Diseases of the Potato in Connecticut.” By Dr. G. P. Clinton, Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven 2.00 P.M. ApprEsSs—“ Thoroughbreds versus Mongrels, from the Farmer’s Standpoint.” By Mr. Maurice F. Delano, Millville, New Jersey. .M. Appress -—“ The Geology of Connecticut as Related to its Water Supply.” Illustrated with Stereopticon. By Professor Herbert E. Gregory, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Ni Go fo) ia] 1905.] | AGRICULTURAL CONVENTION AT HARTFORD. 15 Friday, December 16th. 10.00 A. M. Appress — ‘“‘ The Care and Cultivation of Tobacco in the Connecticut Valley.” By Mr. W. F. Andross, East Hartford, Connecticut. DISCUSSION. 2.00 P.M. ApprRESS—“ Agriculture in the Public Schools.” By Mr. Fred Mutchler, Connecticut Agricultural College, Storrs. DISCUSSION. Led by Mr. Henry T. Burr, Principal Normal School, Willimantic. 7.30 P.M. ApprEss—‘“ The Louisiana Purchase Exhibition.’ By Hon. Charles Phelps, Rockville, Connecticut. Music will be provided at intervals. A Question Drawer will furnish ample opportunity for presentation and discussion of any subject of interest to the practical farmer. To make this feature of the meeting profitable, bring in your ques- tions and take part in the discussions. Ample facilities will be afforded for the exhibition of Fruits and - Flowers, Grain and Vegetables, Butter and Cheese; and the bounti- ful harvest just gathered warrants the hope that there will be a generous exhibit. Mr. N. S. Platt, Pomologist of the Board, will give his personal attention to this feature of the programme. Articles for exhibition may be sent, properly labeled, by express, at the expense of the Board, to the Secretary at Hartford, to arrive on Tuesday, December 13th. RAILROAD ARRANGEMENTS. The N. Y., N. H. & H. R. R. Co. has provided certificates which, when countersigned by the Secretary, will entitle the holder to return over any of its lines at half rates. These certificates must be shown when purchasing tickets at railroad stations in Hartford. 16 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. | Jan., HOTEL ACCOMMODATIONS. The headquarters of the Board will be at the Allyn House. A committee of the Board will be at the Allyn House to furnish delegates and others such information as may be required. Gov. ABIRAM CHAMBERLAIN, EDWIN G. SEELEY, GHARLES Li. BUD EEE, iB JAMES F. BROWN, Committee. NortH STONINGTON, Nov. 25, 1904. REPORT OF THE EROCEEDINGS OF THE CONNECTICUT STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE AT HARTFORD, CONN., DECEMBER 14, 15, AND 16, 1904. MORNING SESSION. HartTForD, Conn., December 14, 1904. Convention called to order at 10.45 A. M. in Unity Hall, Hartford, by Secretary James F. Brown. Secretary Brown. The hour having arrived, the conven- tion will be opened with an invocation by the Reverend Rock- well Harmon Potter of this city. Revs RR. H. -Porrer. Let us pray. Almighty God, our Heavenly Father, Thou returnest the seasons unto the children of men. It is Thy covenant that summer and winter, seed time and harvest, shall not cease from the face of the earth. We give Thee thanks that Thou hast given unto men the fulfillment of this Thy pledge through the generations that are gone, and we can gather before Thee in trust that Thou wilt keep that faith with Thy children. Bless, we beseech Thee, those who cultivate the soil. Give unto them rich fruitage from their labors. Bless them in their homes and in their toil. Remember, we beseech Thee, with favor this common- wealth. Let Thy grace be given unto those who are in author- ity, and grant, we beseech Thee, that in the hearts of the people righteousness may be found, and in the homes of the people purity and truth may abide, and that unto all men may be AGR. —2 18 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jane given a desire for upbuilding Thy kingdom in the earth, and for the coming of justice and brotherly love among all men. Hear us in this our prayer; guide, we beseech Thee, Thy servants as they deliberate together; and keep us all in Thy keeping, and lead us all in Thy way, unto the glory of Thy holy name. Amen. Secretary Brown. You are now invited to listen to an address of welcome by his Honor William F. Henney, Mayor of Hartford. Mayor Henney. Mr. President, members of the Connecti- cut State Board of Agriculture, and friends: I esteem myself very highly honored and privileged today in being permitted to be here, at the invitation of your Secretary, to say a word or two of welcome to you on behalf of the City of Hartford. I do it with the greater pleasure when I recall that this Connecti- cut State Board of Agriculture is a highly representative body. That it is designed to be such is clearly indicated in the statutes, for, as I understand it, it is made up of twelve men, selected one from each Congressional district and one from each county in the State. Territorially, certainly, nothing could be more representative than a board made up in that way. The State of Connecticut is indebted to the agricultural interests, to the farmers of the State, for a great many things, and the city of Hartford is indebted to the farmers of the State for a great many things. The State of Connecticut has for its Governor today the Honorable Abiram Chamberlain, who has told me over and over again that he began life as a farmer’s boy. Here in the city of Hartford we have very many of our most promi- nent men who are fond of talking of the days of their boyhood, when they were brought up on the farm, and we are particu- larly fortunate in that one of our most representative and dis- tinguished citizens was himself a farmer boy, and is now the able and distinguished president of Trinity College. If I had no other inducement to bring me here today, officially, to say a word of welcome to you, that fact would be amply sufficient. 1905. | INTRODUCTORY ADDRESS. 19 There must be something, it seems to me, about this business of farming, that is uplifting, pure, noble, and good, because I find that wherever a boy has been bred upon a farm, no matter what position in life he afterwards occupies, no matter how wealthy he may become, no matter what his affiliations and associations and occupation may be, he always reverts, with a sort of feeling akin to homesickness, to his early life spent upon the farm; and today you will find in the metropolis of our coun- try, down in New York, in every great railroad corporation, in every great banking institution, in every great law office, in every great doctor’s office, a boy who in his leisure moments is constantly referring, with almost inexpressible longing, to the days he spent upon the farm. And I have often thought that whatever other assets these men may acquire in their dis- tinguished careers, they feel that there is one asset which they had as farmer boys which has been of very much more impor- tance to them than most anything else, and that is, the asset of strong bodies and the vigor which comes from the strong, manly life that they lived in the open in their boyhood days. I remember when I was a boy in the high school that there was a poem published which appealed to the whole country and created a great sensation. It was a poem by a well-known New England poet, and it was entitled “ Snow-bound.” You all remember it. It was a story of a country farm, a New England farm, and the poem told the story of the incidents that happened on that farm on a single winter’s day. It depicted a very, very tremendous snow storm, a snow storm that we do not have in these days, and depicted the howling winds and the drifting snow. It depicted the scene within the farmhouse _ and the family gathered there waiting for the storm to abate. It depicted the work of the men and boys after the storm had ceased, and it depicted the gathering around a great fireplace in the farmhouse in the evening, and showed completely the home life of the country boy (Whittier), when he was em- ployed upon his father’s farm. I remember how that poem 20 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., appealed to the people of this whole nation. And it appealed to them because high up in all the great positions of the coun- try were men who knew that he had told the story correctly. Now, it is the business, as it seems to me, of this Board of Agriculture, under the statute creating it, to stimulate and encourage these young men to stay upon the farms, not to go out into the cities, not to go to New York or to come to Hart- ford, but to stay right at home and develop the farms, which, in many instances, are a family heritage for many generations back. In order to do that you have got to do a great deal of practical work, because a man’s first business in this life is to earn his bread and butter. In order to retain the boys upon the farms we have got to teach them how to make farming pay. In other words, you have got to teach farming intelligently, and until that can be done, until the business of farming is a paying proposition, your boys will go away from the farm to the cities, simply because it is a question of earning a liveli- hood. Now, this State Board of Agriculture is endowed with a great many powers, and I hope in the future it will be en- -dowed with a great many more. It has an appropriation annually, and I hope that that appropriation will be largely increased, because I can see that with the intelligent work that this Board is doing we are going to have a different impression put upon this question of farming in Connecticut. No one can tell the amount of good work you have done in improving Connecticut farming. You have relieved the farms of Con- necticut of numberless pests. You have provided for lectures showing the best methods of farming, you have organized farmers’ clubs and farmers’ organizations, and you have given to the social life of our country communities a stimulus which we cannot but feel must redound in great good and prove very helpful in making the life of the farmer attractive. Now these powers that are given to you by the State of course bring corresponding responsibility. I understand by the statute you are required to hold at least one meeting here in the a 1905. | INTRODUCTORY ADDRESS. 21 City of Hartford, and I assure you that you could come to no community where your presence will be more welcome. I bid you welcome today to Hartford, not only because of what you represent, but because of what you are individually, and be- cause of the vital interests which you are trying to stimulate and cultivate, that of this great industry upon which the wel- fare of so many of the human race depends. I bid you a general welcome, thrice welcome, to the City of Hartford. May your stay here be not only pleasant but highly profitable, and may you be abundantly blessed in all your intelligent efforts to obtain the ends at which you aim. I thank you, gentlemen, for your attention. (Applause.) Secretary Brown. Mr. Mayor and ladies and gentlemen: On behalf of the State Board of Agriculture I desire to return to his Honor the thanks of the Board for this cordial welcome which he has extended to us. I am sure that no one in this audience regrets more than I do the absence of the genial Gov- ernor of the State, who was assigned upon the programme to respond to this address of welcome, but. for some reason he is not present. I don’t know whether to consider myself a sub- stitute or a drafted man. I know that forty years ago, when they sent substitutes and drafted men down to the front, we paid very little regard to them, for they were very little account as a rule, but I do want to say that this Board highly appreciates the welcome which his Honor the Mayor has extended to us, and I want to say, further, that there is no antagonism between the country and the cities in the State of Connecticut. It is the growth of the cities of the State that has made farming in Con- necticut possible and prosperous, and the more numerous such cities as Hartford become the more prosperous will the agri- culture of the State become. 7 Now, I know you do not wish to have me keep you from the rare treat which awaits you in the next speaker. I have great pleasure in introducing to you President F. S. Luther of Trinity College, Hartford, who will address you on “ The Country Boy.” 22 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [fan THE COUNGRYV BOY: ’ By PresipENT F. S. Lutruer, of Trinity College, Hartford, Conn. Mr. Mayor, Mr. Secretary, and ladies and gentlemen: I think the last speech that I heard on this subject of “ The Country Boy ” was one that was delivered some years ago, and not very many years ago either, on grounds then leased, but now belonging to the Windham County Agricultural Associa- tion. It was at their annual fair and cattle show, held in Brooklyn. I do not mean Brooklyn, New York, but Brooklyn, Connecticut. The fair was held there at that time, as it has been held, I believe, every year but one since somewhere about 1850. That speech was delivered by the Honorable Lafayette Foster, a distinguished citizen of our commonwealth, and after- wards, if not then, a Senator of the United States. I wish I could remember the whole of that speech. If I could, and could repeat it to you here, you would have a good one this morning. But I do remember one sentence that appealed to me very powerfully. He said, and I had to be lifted up to see him over the crowd, “I know what it is to drive the cows to pasture on a cold morning.” And I recall, with a feeling which I know many of you here will share with me, how my mother looked up into my face and said, “ There, do you hear that?” One thing more he said, that also appealed to me, and to which neither my mother nor my father did call very special attention. Speaking of the goings on of the farm day in that time, and telling how, after dinner, the men loafed awhile under the trees in the yard, if it was summer, having their nooning, he spoke of how somehow the boy upon the farm never got any nooning. I wish I had had nerve enough to turn to my mother and say then, “ There, did you hear that?”’ But after all, nooning or no nooning, the boy upon the farm usually managed somehow to have a good deal of fun in the old days on the Connecticut farm. And asa distinguished Hartford citizen, who died about four years ago, said in what has always seemed to me the very best of his writings (and I refer to Charles D. Warner), in his little volume “ Being a Boy,” it is undoubtedly the case that any farm would come to grief pretty quick that did not have the boy on it, for he is the one that does everything that nobody else is willing to do. How many of the things that the boy 1905. | THE COUNTRY BOY. 23 used to do are not done at all any more in these days. Turn- ing the grindstone for grinding scythes during haying. There are no more scythes. Are there any grindstones? If so, who is to turn them? And it has been pointed out, I think by Mr. Charles D. Warner, in the same book, that it is an inevita- ble indication that an old man has reached his second childhood when he is asked to turn the grindstone. There are a few things, and only two or three, in my life, of which I am proud, and I think the proudest experience of my life was this one, when as a boy I developed a precocious ability to grind the scythe, and especially when my father said to me “I believe you can grind a scythe better than I can do it.” From that day he turned the grindstone and I ground the scythes. I am quite sure that I have never since done anything quite as well as I used to grind scythes, and nothing ever gave me such sincere and unalloyed pleasure as to bear hard upon the stone and see my father wonder what made that stone go with such difficulty. (Laughter.) But that old farm life, and that old village life in the Connecticut country towns, and in the New England country towns, what a splendid thing it was. I do not know whether there have ever been any finer people than the farmers of Connecticut, of the generation that has gone or that is about disappearing, unless it be the farmers who are gathered here today. The life that the old-fashioned farmers lived was full of hardships, and how on earth some of the work was done I cannot see! There was not very much money in it, and the farmers seldom had any considerable amount, even for them, except once or twice a year, and especially in the fall, when the farmers sold their pork. I do not know how many hundreds of dollars in actual cash passed through the old leather pocketbooks, those old worn leather pocketbooks with a strap around them, that everybody used to carry in those days, but there is one thing that I am sure of, and that is, that in the houses there was culture— books and reading, an appreciation of the high things of life; an understanding of the intellectual life ; an interest that the schools should be the best possible, though I must say if we take the glory of reminiscence from them they were not very good schools, but in the interest — that the schools should be the best that they could be under the conditions, an interest in the support of the churches, and an ardent desire that if there was, here and there, a bright boy or 24 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., girl, he or she should not lose the chance that belonged to them. But somehow things were done and accomplished. There were pleasant days, easy days, amid culture, refinement, and edu- cation. Books were few, too few, compared to our day, but there was the Old Farmers’ Almanac, with the string through the corner, which always hung up by the chimney, and out in my section of the country, at that time, that was always found until you passed over the dividing line, which lay somewhere between Brooklyn and New London, south of which you always found Daboll’s Almanac. In these old farmhouses you always found the American Agriculturist, the New York Trib- une, or, as we always.used to call it, Greeley’s paper ; possibly a magazine or two, Rollin’s “Ancient History,” and two or three religious books, depending upon the religious convictions which your father happened to entertain, and that was about all, except Godey’s or Peterson’s, which were dear to the hearts of the women folks in determining the character and archi- tecture of their Sunday bonnets and various other things. That was about the ordinary run of reading in the farmhouses, but, oh, my, how everybody did read it! How you knew every- thing, from the first advertisement on the paper cover, even in the corners of the first page, clear through to the very last thing. I spoke or alluded just now to the religious convictions of our fathers. And I tell you they had them for keeps. A man was a Congregationalist or Baptist or Methodist, or in my sec- tion, in rather rare cases, an Episcopalian, and, whatever he was, he was pretty sure to say so. There was no hiding of his convictions. And they used to condemn each other with an enthusiasm and perversity that was worthy of all admiration for its intensity, if not worthy of imitation in its results in the community. People in those days studied theological ques- tions, and the boys listened to them and braced themselves up to fight with each other in behalf of their fathers’ convictions. It was a great thing for a boy to have an excuse for a fight. He always wanted one. I am bound to say, however, that I have heard more sincere and able discussions of theological questions in a certain red wheelwright shop which used to stand in the town of Brooklyn, Conn., and the building is there yet, though the red paint has long since disappeared, than I have heard since, and I have had quite as much to do with theologi- 1905. | THE COUNTRY BOY. 25 cal discussions as anybody ought to be allowed to have. The reason why was that the people really cared. They thought that their life hereafter was somehow dependent upon their conclusions in these great, tremendous questions. If they were mistaken, as, personally, I think they were, for after all the great thing in life is to live correctly, rather than to believe in any certain philosophical belief or principle, nevertheless it was a fine thing for those old fathers and grandfathers of ours that they cared about the great things of life; that it was a matter of importance to them whether certain philosophical propositions, having to do with the advance of the human soul, were or were not true. It helped them to bear the trials, sor- rows, and prejudices of life. It kept their eyes open and their faces towards the morning. It helped them to see things if not in their reality, to see at least and understand some of the affairs of every day life, yet deserving of their high energy and calling for the best there was in them. Now, in such an intense civilization as that, in a society made up of people that did care, there grew up the country boy of fifty years ago and more. Those were the days before the advent of the Village Improve- ment Society, when the grass on the village green grew un- vexed by the lawn mower, when it was tumbled and pitched aside by a pair of boys and girls hurrying to and fro from their schools, and perhaps mown after haying was done by some thrifty soul, who, if he could get a few tumbles of hay despite the boys, thought himself well off. There is a beauty in that as we look back at it, | am sure there is a beauty in it, and a glamour of beautiful reminiscences over it, if we could see it again as it used to exist, see the grass on the green and in the village fields, where we, as boys, used to lie and dream; in those fields that were open to everybody in the old New Eng- land village, adjoining and surrounding the principal New Eng- land village church. What a flood of tender recollections comes to us when we endeavor to think of those happy days. What a pleasant thing it was, when you and I Were little, to lie down in that tall grass and to study with the exquisite eye of youth the red top, so like an oak tree if you got it near enough to your eye. How many air castles have been built by you and me as we have lain there in the grass watching through the stalks for some stray, mysterious message from fairy land, and thinking of great days to come. Ah, those were glorious 26 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., castles that we built on those old days, lying there in the grass. Do you remember that old game, when, with a little girl or a playmate, you sat in the grass and you and she each pulled the stalks over and put a thumb and finger at the bottom and ran it up towards the end until there came one little drop of sap upon the end of the grass, and then you and your friend touched the two ends together, and the one that got both drops won? What a foolish little game, and yet how pleasant it was, especially when you won, if you had nerve enough to under- stand and take what you were entitled to afterwards. You cannot play that any more, now that the lawn mower has come. We have in almost every village a fine gymnasium. Was there ever a gymnasium like a barn floor? Is there any ap- paratus that can compare in effectiveness with that which we had there? We have now, in gymnasiums, carefully knotted ropes, or ropes with pegs put into them, at convenient intervals, up which the youth may climb. There were no knots or pegs in our ropes. If we needed anything like that we had a tight rope, or a rope extending from a beam, and the climber had no such assistance in going up, and if he fell, in case of acci- dent, he always fell upon the hard barn floor, and not in some friendly net. But now, gentlemen, those days are gone, not only for you and me, but for everybody. That particular kind of village life, that particular kind of country life, that special form of farm life, is not coming back. It is idle to think of recalling it. It has passed away. We see nothing today but the beauty and the glory. We think of the poetical side of it. We read with a lump in our throats and moisture in our eyes that beautiful poem already alluded to, that sweet song of Whittier’s, for we can realize its beauty, for many of us have had that same experience when we were “ Snow Bound ” in the long ago. But there was something beside beauty. There was a lot of hard work in those days. It was hard to get up in the morn- ing, and hard to go out into the fields on frosty days and not fall. Machinery did not do so much for man in those days as it does now. Good or bad, sweet or bitter, easy or difficult, it has gone and gone forever. The best kind of New England life disappeared, as it always seemed to me, with the civil war. There are not many of us here who can remember that, except as boys, and I imagine that there are but few here who were 1905. | THE COUNTRY BOY. 27, even boys at that time. But those who were children, when the trumpets were sounded, can remember when our young men and youth marched away and so few of whom came back, and some of you can remember the women going up and down our streets with tense set faces, waiting for the tidings of loved ones, which too often, in sad form, came too quickly. That is what the war was to us. When it was over and our young men, those who served, came back, there was a change in the whole spirit of our civilization and of our life. The spirit of adventure began to awake. The spirit of travel came on. A desire to break away from the narrow confines of our New England farms came over our young men. Knowledge of vast prairies of the west, and remembrances of the riches of the gold fields of California, discovered shortly before the war, and an understanding of the greatness of our country, which had been increased during their absence, was borne in upon them, and gave rise to a spirit of restlessness and discontent with the life that they had been living. All of these things af- fected the youth of our country at that time, and it has always seemed to me that that was the beginning of the deserting of New England farms. It was that which started that series of events which has resulted in that long list of unoccupied farm- houses that so many of us know where to find in the old districts which once were the homes of sturdy farmers a generation ago. And again, also, the enormous development of agricultural ma- chinery has made farm life a very different thing. The trolley car later came, followed by the lawn mower, so that the villages have changed, and though the differences of theological opinion, to which I alluded, have disappeared, yet there has not been left any intensity of conviction about anything that would make the strong, sturdy characters that we had a generation ago. Those strong, sturdy characters are coming again, and will be once more around us and be found among these rock-bound hills of New England. I feel confident of that. One thing more, it seems to me, must comé back, if New England country life is to be what it was before, and that is, a sincere respect for, and a sincere, earnest desire to engage in real hard work. Now, gentlemen, you and I can remember that to do a job of work well, and to do it faster and better than anybody else, was, in our time, a thing to be boasted of. I recall very well how the farmers of the hamlet where I lived 28 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., broke the Sabbath one day by spending Sunday noon talking about a remarkable feat of a certain fellow, a large, husky, powerful farmer, who husked and put into the wagon a remark- able number of bushels of corn the day before. Now, today, I am afraid that farm hands would rather tell how few bushels of corn they have managed to husk and get into the wagon, rather than how many. Now, is not that so, gentlemen? Is not the spirit of pride in work, to a very large extent, gone out of our people? Is not that one trouble with the New England farmer? I admit freely, and I am glad of it, that nobody on the farm needs to work with his hands as hard as we had to do a generation ago. We are using now the powers of the lower animals, and more and more, also, the material forces of nature. The electric battery, and the power of electricity, the power of the winds and the streams, and the power that is in our wood piles and our coal bins, to do the work of life, and less and less are the big body and strong muscles of man necessary for the accomplishment of daily tasks. But, gentlemen, farmers, men, just so sure as there goes out from the hearts of men a respect for the accomplishment of tasks in the best way that they can be done, just so sure as men cease to take pride in doing their work well, just so sure as we cease to admire successful achieve- ment, just so certain as man comes to think that the opportunity of his life will be found in avoiding work, rather than in doing work, just so sure will the civilization of the country and the State go down and not up. I have no faith whatever in the man who leaves the farm because he feels he will find an easier life somewhere else. I do not think he will. I hope he will not. It seems to me that we must develop more and more that ideal spirit in man which rejoices in accomplishing things for their own sake. I have a deep respect, a high feeling, for the chap that husked that tremendous lot of corn on that Saturday so many years ago in Brooklyn, Conn. He is a better man than anybody who dodges work and who leaves the farm because he desires to look for some easier task. That is also one of the great troubles with our schools, that so many go there feeling that if they are taught a little bookkeeping, a little type- writing, a little more mathematics perhaps than somebody else knows, that somewhere and somehow they are going to escape the serious responsibilities of life, and are going to be able to make an easy living. It is a mistake. They are not going to. 1905. | THE COUNTRY BOY. 29 In fact they are going to lead less worthy lives and actually take away from the human race something for what they were put into this world to give it. No, gentlemen, farming in New England will regain something of its old pre-eminence, some- thing of its old joyousness, when there comes into the minds of our young men an increased respect for work and a greater love for the actual doing of things. Any man who has four or five big marks on his hands, which show that he has done hard work, if he has the idea in his mind that those marks are not a badge of honor, he is not a good American. I do not mean to discredit the head-work of the world. I do not mean to say that. I do not mean to say that the responsibility of oversee- ing, and the government and mastering of industry, is not a mighty task, but I do say that the trouble with the farm, if there is any trouble, is that which exists today in our factories ; is the trouble that exists today in every avenue of human effort, and that is, that the American boy has lost his enthusiasm for work. If there was anything in the country boy of a genera- tion ago, about which I have tried to say a few words to you; if there was anything that was truly worthy of admiration, it was his general notion that it was a fine thing to be able to do a good deal; a fine thing to be strong, a fine thing to see to it that nobody cut his corners when he was mowing, a fine thing to be proud that he could spread hay as fast, or faster than five men could mow, a fine thing to pitch as large a tumble of hay upon a wagon as his father, a fine thing to be able to mow away hay as fast as anybody could pitch it to him. That was the great characteristic, which meant something to a country boy if he was worth anything. If that has gone out today, if the boy of today, whether in the country or in the city, has lost that feeling which should make him proud of being able to accomplish work, then not only are there going to be deserted farms, but there are going to be deserted shops. I do not believe in anything of that sort. I believe that the spirit of our boys is all right; that their enthusiasm for work really exists as strong as ever, if we will only teach them something like that. There is the salvation that we need, the salvation of our country, the glory of our country, which we are going to have in its boys and in its girls, in those boys who are willing and intend to do whatever their generation calls upon them to do; who intend not to shirk the work, but to do it. 30 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. (Wamu Now there are a great many other things which I might say under this subject, which would be of possible interest to farm- ers, but I observe by the programme that I am down to occupy the time between eleven o’clock and half past one. I hardly think any of you will care to hear me talk that length of time. IT am not here to go into general details of the boy upon the farm, nor do I mean to tell you in detail exactly how to do the work about the farms. I will leave a little something for you other gentlemen. I do, however, want to say this, gentlemen, that the thing that is going to make the farms profitable is a lot of hard work. That is the great thing that we should seek to arouse and to cultivate. If our boys lose that they do not deserve to be on the farms; they do not deserve to dwell in this country. Somebody was introduced once by a speaker in this way. The president of the meeting said that Mr. So-and-so is here. “I have great pleasure in saying that we shall now lis- ten to a lecture on fools by one—of my best friends. (Laughter.) To which the lecturer responded, “I am’ not nearly as big a fool as the gentleman who just spoke — would have you believe.” Well, you have had a short talk on the country boy by one who is especially proud of the fact that he was a country boy, an old Windham county boy, and who values that experience as a country boy in a country village and on a country farm, beyond everything else in his life. It is the greatest advantage, it seems to me, that any boy can have. I would like to tell you something that President Elliot of Harvard said to me the other day. We happened to be together at a meeting. He was advocating what, to some, were rather objectionable feat- ures of our preparatory schools, and he said something like this: “‘ [ think the preparatory school may naturally be expected to give every boy at least a taste, a sip, of every kind of knowl- edge, so that when he comes to college he shall know what kind of studies he likes and what kind he does not like. There were some who seemed to think that was expecting a good deal of the school.” After thinking it over I said, “ Dr. Elliot, I am inclined to think you are right,” but as I look back to my days in the country school, in a country town, it seems to me, while I was by no means extraordinary, that I got a good deal more than a sip of various studies. I got something not to be had in the ordinary school. Beyond all that, in the country 1905. | DISCUSSION. 31 school I did get a taste for pretty much all kinds of knowledge. I know that I got a little of the sciences, I read a little history, and I imbibed something of philosophy, something of the com- mon branches and of other things, which created a taste for greater familiarity with human knowledge. Then said Dr. Elliot, with that beautiful smile of his, “ You were brought up on a farm. You had great good fortune. All the efforts of the schools today,” said Dr. Elliot, “all the manual training, and all this kind of scientific nature study, and all those kinds of observational studies, are directed towards the one end of trying to find some substitute for those things that came naturally, as a matter of course, into the life of the country boy on a New England farm. We may succeed in doing it, but so far I do not believe we have.” Certainly that was an opinion worth considering. Well, while it is a splendid thing to live in close connection with nature, and to work with her in the fields, as was our opportunity in the old days in the country life, it was a good thing, and it still is a good thing, for the boys and girls. Happy are they that grew up in those surroundings, and blessed was our lot, that we studied the mechanics of the wood-saw, the axe, and the crowbar, to say nothing of the toy mill and water wheel. Happy were we that we learned respect for the great beliefs of mankind in our fathers’ smithy or blacksmith shop. Happy were we that we breathed the fresh air of the country and took into ourselves the strong breath of the hills, and blessed were we because we had a chance to wander over the hills and under the skies. Blessed are we as we look back now to those days, all glory tinted, out of which has gone every recollection of everything that is hard or toilsome, or difficult to be borne. It is all splendid now. Heaven grant that it may be equally splendid as our children look back, fifty years hence, to their early days in this dear land of ours. (Applause.) Mr. Gotp. Mr. Chairman, may I be allowed to say a word at this time? Secretary Brown. With pleasure. Mr. Gotp. Mr. Chairman, I have listened with high appre- ciation to the address which we have had upon the country boy. I am glad to hear from Brooklyn, Conn. Particularly glad. 32 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., When I started upon my farm life I looked around the State hunting for somebody to help me in trying to advance the agriculture of the State, and I struck upon one of those Brook- lyn boys, or he was looking for me, I will not say which. He came from Rhode Island originally, but settled in Brooklyn. Henry A. Dwyer, the first secretary of the State Agricultural Society, was from Brooklyn. And just those conditions which we have heard discussed by the speaker, when they discussed great theological questions in the blacksmith shop, I found existing there in Brooklyn, when I spent a Sabbath day with my friend Mr. Dwyer. In his family there were two teams got ready every Sabbath day to go to church. One of them went to the Congregational church, and the other team went to the Episcopal church. While that was one point, here is another: There was this rivalry between these two institutions, and dis- cussion ran high, on which the members of these two societies came together as one. There was an old deacon there in the Congregational church who was a watchmaker by trade, but who was an ardent cultivator of flowers. A wonderful culti- vator of flowers. He was poor, but he managed to live. There was also an Episcopalian minister there, who had a small salary, and also a lover of flowers. He built a greenhouse with his own hands, and raised there the most beautiful flowers found any- where in that part of Connecticut. Those two men, while they were theologically apart, and often discussed these matters, were as one in their common admiration and their love of the culture of flowers and in the pleasing effects that flowers bring to the people where they had an opportunity to distribute them. Either one of them would hitch up his horse and drive three miles to carry a bunch of flowers to a sick lady, and they would often get together to show each other their choice productions. They were as happy in the enjoyment of that pleasant social intercourse that brought them together as they were in their works and achievements of life. The old deacon in his last days made a happy strike in agriculture, which relieved him of 1905. | DISCUSSION. 33. all his debts and allowed him to die above board. He cultivated the gladiolus when it was first introduced here. He had a magnificent bed of them, and many thousands of plants were sold in advance of nurserymen, greatly to his advantage. About the same year the Early Rose potato was first brought into cultivation, and he cultivated several acres of that. And those Rose potatoes and the gladioli brought him out of debt, free and above board, so that he was enabled to pay his debts and die in comfortable circumstances. That was in Brooklyn. In my early correspondence with my friend at Brooklyn, our postmaster, when I sent a letter to Mr. Dwyer upon one occasion, held it back because he thought I had made a mistake in addressing it “ Brooklyn, Conn.” He said I had addressed it to Brooklyn, Conn., instead of addressing it, as I should, to Brooklyn, N. Y. He would not send it off until he had inquired to know whether I had not made a mistake. That was the knowledge of Brooklyn in our part of the State at that time. But I found in Brooklyn, through Mr. Dwyer and this old deacon and this Episcopalian clergyman, through their cultiva- tion of flowers, that it made, all through the town, a good deai of difference when you put conditions upon the general farms throughout the State. I want to bear this testimony at this time, to my appreciation of getting some information with regard to the early days of Brooklyn, Conn. Secretary Brown. lam sure, gentlemen, you all share with me the great surprise I have felt at having the country life of forty years ago so eloquently depicted by a college president. We did not expect that a college president would have so much early knowledge of farm life in Connecticut. Another thing, I have nowhere and at no time heard expressed so clearly and so conclusively the causes which have been at work to depopulate the rural towns of Connecticut, as it has been depicted here this morning by President Luther. We know of the changes that took place forty years ago, when so many of our young men went to the front never to return, AGR. —3 34 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [ Jan., but those who did return had seen the larger life; had had a wider outlook, so that they became adventurous, and the farm life of Connecticut was too narrow to content them. There dated from that time the decline of the value of New England farms, and the decline in the population of our rural towns. And the other reason so clearly and forcibly expressed by President Luther was that at about the same time came the introduction, so largely, of improved machinery. Those two things, to my mind, have been most potent factors in reducing the population of our rural districts and causing the desertion of so many of our rural farms. That completes the programme for this morning, but I want to say that during the intermission there will be a meet- ing of the sheep breeders of Connecticut in this hall. This afternoon we shall be furnished with music at the opening of the convention. The convention will now stand adjourned until two o’clock. AFTERNOON SESSION. Convention called to order at 2.00 p. M., Secretary Brown in the Chair. Secretary Brown. We have prepared some music, and if you will come to order the first thing gn our programme this afternoon will be a song. (Song and music by quartette.) Secretary Brown. We are to have now an introductory address by Mr. F. H. Stadtmueller, president of the Connecti- cut Sheep Breeders’ Association. THE DECLINE OF THE SHEEP INDUSTRY Ty CONNECTICUG,. By PresmpENT F. H. STADTMUELLER, Of the Connecticut Sheep Breeders’ Association. Mr. Chairman, and ladies and gentlemen: I have felt that no more fitting theme as an introductory for this meeting, 1905. | DECLINE OF SHEEP INDUSTRY IN CONNECTICUT. 35 which seems to be devoted particularly to the sheep interests of the State, could be made than one which would briefly review the history of the decline of the sheep industry in the State of Connecticut, and it is to that subject I invite your attention. The decline of sheep husbandry in Connecticut affords a good illustration of the effect of economic influences upon an agricultural industry. The forces which produced this decline were so slow in their operation as to be practically impercepti- ble at the time of their fulfillment, requiring the lapse of con- siderable time to clearly define the primary causes, and few peo- ple have ever thoroughly understood them. A brief review of economic phases in the past century does not take long to dis- close the reasons of this decline. To facilitate the presenta- tion of these facts, I will not confine myself to exact dates, but will refer in a general way as to times and periods in the dis- cussion of the subject. In the fore part of the last century, up to about 1840 or 1850, sheep were maintained upon the farms of New England primarily for the production of wool, the wool being needed for the production of clothing, blankets, etc., required by the farmers and others. At that time the common practice was to make the cloth at home, including, practically, every detail of the operation, from the growth of the wool to the finished clothing. Towards the end of this period, owing to the exten- sion of the law of division of labor, the manufacture of cloth and various preparations of the wool necessary to the manu- facture of cloth, was gradually diverted from the farm to the shop. Coincident, or closely following the period of the devel- opment of the manufacture of woolens in mills, the revolution of transportation facilities began by the use of locomotives and steamboats. This opened vast tracts of fertife land for the abundant production of staple agricultural products in our country, while large and extensive territories throughout the world were entered and opened by other civilized nations. Owing to the increased facilities of transportation, whereby both the markets for the disposal of products and acquisition of the raw material were greatly extended, particularly the last, the manufacture of woolens developed rapidly. That is a point that should be borne in mind. The market, by the acquisition of the raw material, was extended more rapidly; that is, the 36 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., field of acquisition was extended more rapidly, or was taken so generally, that it developed with greater rapidity than the field for the market for the disposal of the product. Farmers still continued, for a short time, to grow practically about the same quantity of wool, but it was not long before isolated instances developed where the husbandman found. that the maintenance of the few sheep that had formerly been necessary to produce the wool for his clothing, did not nick well with the economic administration of his affairs. More- over, the manufacturing enterprises of our State were practi- cally in their infancy, and the consuming population was not of such dimensions as to cause or lend any assistance of any importance to the phase of meat production as a source of revenue in sheep husbandry. The result of which was that within a decade or two following this movement, the whole progressive school of farmers soon realized that it had become more economical to relegate the manufacture of homespun material to the factories and buy cloths, thus utilizing the energy heretofore required in this production in further avenues affording greater remuneration. Thus the sheep industry of New England naturally decreased, and the keeping of sheep was gradually abandoned from farm to farm, until through- out Connecticut the industry practically declined into utter insignificance as an agricultural enterprise, compared with its importance at the opening of the century. During the next thirty years, from 1860 to 1890, two great economic changes took place, which restored the sheep hus- bandry again to the class of possibly profitable agricultural enterprises in Connecticut. One of the changes has been caused by the rapid increase of our consuming population, which has very materially stimulated the demand for meat, compared with that existing in the days of former prosperity in the sheep industry, while the other is the very great shrink- age which has taken place in land values throughout the greater portion of Connecticut. The latter condition was brought about largely by the extensive railroad development, and par- ticularly that in the western States. This has had a most depressing influence upon agricultural values in Connecticut, so that today thousands of acres are lying idle, and are nomi- nally of such insignificant value that it is hardly necessary to establish ownership and title thereto. 1905. | DECLINE OF SHEEP INDUSTRY IN CONNECTICUT. 37 Those of you who listened to the very fine explanation of the causes for the condition of agriculture during the past twenty or thirty years in our State, as made by President Luther in his exceedingly able address this morning, will dis- cern a possible disagreement between Dr. Luther and myself in regard to the causes of that decline in Connecticut. Dr. Luther disagrees with me in so far as the influence which he placed upon the war and the return of the troops from the south developed a spirit of restlessness, he dating the decline of agriculture in New England, or in Connecticut, at the time immediately following the civil war, His date and mine sub- stantially agree in time, but I believe man, ever since his exist- ence, has been restless, and has been prone to wander and seek new fields and new territories, and that is rather more due to the tremendous railroad development which ensued shortly after the war, and which, of course, greatly increased the facili- ties for getting away. I believe that distinction should be made. Hence, under these conditions, with cheap land and the best markets in the country at our doors, there can be no doubt but that the time has arrived when sheep industry can again be profitably undertaken in our State. It is exceedingly interesting to observe, in passing, that these two exciting causes of the decline of sheep husbandry, namely, the growth of manufacturing, of transportation, have eventually done much to produce conditions favorable to its reestablishment, although on a different basis. Formerly wool was the primary object, the meat having been of secondary importance. Now meat is the primary consideration, with wool as a by-product. One great obstacle is offered to this development, namely, dogs. As sheep husbandry declined, and sheep, relatively speaking, became extinct in this State, few years were required before the existing generation of dogs did not know what sheep were. This is a perfectly natural result, and not fraught with any particular element of danger, until such time when sheep husbandry might be renewed as at present. It is not difficult to imagine that under these circumstances, as soon as any given person would proceed to keep sheep, it would simply be a question of time ere he would be confronted with discourage- ment by the loss and damage following a visit from or an inva- 38 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., sion of dogs, for dogs are so common that it is inconceivable for anybody sustaining a flock of sheep in Connecticut for more than a week or so before being discovered by some dog or other. This dog, wherever or whoever it might be, upon beholding sheep would simply recognize therein the discovery of some new creature, and would proceed to exercise its abil1- ties to demonstrate whether sheep were to be classed as game and sport for it, or whether they were animals endowed with equal or superior qualities to those possessed by itself. We all know what the result has been, and invariably must be as long as two such opposing forces as exist in sheep and dogs are brought together. However, the importance of the dog question has obtained undue prominence by reason of the opin- ion that the decline in the sheep industry was occasioned by the ravages of dogs. This is perhaps a pardonable view for judg- ment, limited to and based upon present occurrences, but, as has been indicated, it is nevertheless erroneous. The most practi- cal solution of the dog phase of this problem rests upon proper fencing. Here again economical changes come to the shep- herd’s aid by the great reduction which has taken place within recent years in the cost of fencing material. Moreover, much assistance may be had to encourage the reestablishment of the sheep industry by the attitude assumed by town officials in the adjustment which has taken place over the question of damages occasioned by dogs. In the past the action of the average selectmen in settling damages, as required by our statutes, for losses occasioned by dogs, has been controlled by one motive only, namely, to adjust the damages upon as low a basis as pos- sible — upon as low a basis as he could possibly force the sheep owners to accept without seeking to obtain greater and more just compensation before the courts. The selectmen, as a rule, were perhaps justified in this attitude, because of the shrinkage of agricultural land values, and because the towns where this has been most extensive must have suffered materially from the diminishment of their grand lists, which, in turn, diminished the resources of the town. Moreover, the time has arrived when it appears that it would be better policy for town officials to assume as liberal a course as possible in the adjustment of these claims for damages to sheep, caused by dogs, for in so doing sheep husbandry will be encouraged, and that encouragement will result in the reéstab- 1905. | SHEEP. 7 39 lishment of the industry of sheep husbandry and afford one of the successful methods now before us of reestablishing land values on large areas throughout the State. This being done it will naturally enhance the prosperity of the towns. Thus the reéstablishment of the sheep husbandry in Connecticut must now be done primarily for meat, and secondarily for wool, and an incidental factor of the whole matter will be the reéstab- lishment of agricultural !and values in many portions of our State. DISCUSSION. Secretary Brown. Mr. Stadtmueller is ready to answer any questions which you may put to him. I certainly congratu- late him upon the way in which he has presented his case. It has been so clearly demonstrated that there is no room for argument against its acceptance. We will now listen to some music before we discuss the sheep question further. Music. Secretary Brown. We have with us this afternoon a gen- tleman from Vermont, which, as you know, has a great reputa- tion for its wool and its sheep. This gentleman has just been abroad for the purchase of thoroughbreds, and knows the sheep question from end to end. I have the pleasure of introducing to you Mr. L. B. Harris of Lyndonville, Vt. SHEEP: By L. B. Harris of Lyndonville, Vt. Mr. Chairman and Ladies and Gentlemen: I am a little hard of hearing and so do not know what has been said heretofore. I wish I did, because the sheep question in Connecticut is a difficult one, and I would like to know what the other fellows have said about it. In human affairs I have found that usually the thing that is is for the best. We have seen a town meet- ing voting what you knew would ruin the whole community if carried out, and yet we have seen everything that the mob has done come out right in the end. They usually land on their feet and come out all right. 40 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., Now, for the sake of argument, let us assume that it is best for Connecticut that it did get out of the sheep industry. I do not believe that, but it may be it was best, and may be it is best yet. I suppose there is one cow to every six sheep that has disappeared, and it may be there is a cow for every sheep that has disappeared. I hope there is. I should not be surprised if there are two cows in Connecticut for every sheep that has gone out of the State, so that agriculture has gone along; not on my line of agriculture — and it is distasteful to me that it has not done so if that be the fact — yet, on the whole, there has probably been an advance in some other line. Now, when you go home, if you live out of town, you look out over the fields and you will see, all over Connecticut, more so than in most of the States, weeds that are above the fifteen inches of snow which has fallen. Those weeds have gone to seed, and they have not done anybody any good. I believe that to be true of Connecticut, and any State in the Union where that is the case. It would have been better if the land had been cultivated with some useful plant, if something of that kind had been grown where those weeds grew. Of course, that is self-evident ; but that was not done, and it is not likely to be done nowadays as much as it ought to be done. Therefore, the weeds are there. Now, there is a time in the life of almost every weed that it is good food for sheep. If you will take a flock of sheep out of the barn, which is the worst place a flock ever was put in, by the way, and if you were to drive them out of the ordinary New England barn, and drive them onto one of these fields into the snow, you would find that they would immediately begin to eat these weeds until they got their stomachs full. And another thing about it, those weeds would make good mutton. There is hardly a weed in existence but what, at some time during its life, or at some time during the year, is not good food for sheep. So on the face of it, while there are many of them that are not good food for milch cows, as many of you know, yet there are a great many of them that are excellent food for sheep. So I think you will agree with me that it would be profitable to feed all the weeds that we can, especially in view of the fact that the weeds agree with the sheep, and the sheep take to the weeds. We could not quarrel about that. I believe, further- more, it will be profitable to feed all sorts of plants to sheep. 1905. | SHEEP. 41 There is hardly any edible plant that grows in our climate but they can use. In fact I would be willing to buy a farm in Connecticut today, and run in debt for it, and run in debt for my stock and my tools, and rely entirely, as a means of getting out of debt, on my prospects of what I could get out of it by farming the sheep. I know I could pay the mortgage, because I have done it. Now, I am not going to ask you to let me discuss mutton alone, though even that is more than I can handle, in the lim- ited time allowed me, as it ought to be. The Secretary wanted me to discuss. sheep. I suppose I shall have to. But I am going to talk a little about mutton too. He said I had got to discuss sheep, but I have got the advantage of him now. Now, for the next half hour, while I have got the advantage of the Secretary, I can say what I have a mind to. Iam going to try to tell you something interesting about sheep, but really my heart is in two things. I want to teach you that every man of you that raises sheep should raise rape. If I can make five of you put in a piece of rape another year I shall do as much good as a man usually does in this business, because it will be a step in the right direction. Another thing that I want to teach you, and I am sorry there are no more of the women folks here to hear it, and that is, how to kill a sheep, and how to take care of it after it is killed, and how to cook and how to eat mutton. If I could get three or four of you here to understand this matter, so that the next time you buy a piece of mutton, instead of put- ting it into a milk pan you will put it in the cellar and hang it up in the proper way, then I have accomplished one of my objects in coming here. If I can make you understand that mutton is not fit to eat until it has been killed at least six weeks, then I have made a great step towards bringing you up out of barbarism into the enlightenment of a better day. Mutton prop- erly aged, properly killed, and properly cooked, is the least harm- ful of any meat, and the cheapest. Now, before I take up these two questions, I want to lay down the financial proposition. And this is a good audience before which to do it. I do not know how it is going to be disseminated out among the poor, because they are not here. You gentlemen that are here are well-to-do, you do not have to work very hard, and I think you have considerable leisure on your hands. I think that state- ment covers this audience, as a rule, and in consequence of that 42 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [ Jan., there is a good deal of responsibility resting on you to inform the other fellows that are not here. Really, they are the ones most in need of information and instruction. Now, we will assume a young man, twenty-one years of age, starting out as a farmer. Of course, he has got to have some capital, and if he takes another branch and divides his capital, of course, he will require more than if he devotes all of his funds to one branch. But if he will go to work and be diligent, in a few years he can have considerable capital by following, in the main, what I am going to tell you. Now, here is an important thing. I might talk here a month, and I could not make a good shepherd out of a man that is not a good shep- herd naturally... Shepherds are like poets, they are born, and unless you know when you see a sheep what is going on in that sheep’s head — and it has got the smallest head of any four- footed animal, and they know less — but unless you know what that sheep wants, do not go into the sheep business. Now, last year I wanted some ewes. I saw a farmer who said to me that he had some in his flock. I said to him, “I will be at your house at nine o’clock tomorrow morning, and I wish you would gather them up so I can run the flock over and see what you have got.” He said he would. When I got there I found that he had the flock shut up in a cow stable, had not ventilated it in any way, and it was packed with sheep. Now, that flock of sheep, if it had been good for anything in the first place, never would have been good for anything after that. In a moment of thoughtlessness he ruined his flock of sheep, if there had been any ruin to it. Iam afraid there was not much worth to it before he shut it up. Anyway, it was useless for me to pur- chase any of the flock, for they were not adapted to my pur- poses, and I do not buy that kind of sheep if I can help it. The simple fact was he did not know how. He had run behind every year. Now sheep will not stand a lack of air. They have got to have it. They have got to have it all the time. Neither will they stand a damp place. Now, I know you will say, “ I know of such and such a man, who is called as good a business man as you ever saw, and he keeps them in his barn cellar.” That simply goes to show, my friends, that that man is an excellent shepherd, except perhaps in that one particular. If he would use greater care with his flock I would wager he would have a great deal better flock of sheep. But we must 1905. | SHEEP. 43 get back to our young man. First of all, he must have some natural adaptability and love of sheep husbandry, and he must have some definite plan as to the way in which he proposes to carry on the sheep industry. There are many ways in which it can be done, but there is usually but one right way. It may be by selling his mutton and lambs, or the yearlings or two year olds, or by the wool alone. Now, the first and most impor- tant thing is for him to start right. He must choose his flock. Let him choose anything he likes, in the way of variety, but make sure to get good stock, and to get good stock he must know sheep. Of course, he must have a farm to put them on. Your Secretary tells me that there is lots of land in Connecticut, eight or nine miles away from the railroads, which can be bought very reasonably. Now, in starting a flock I should buy, perhaps, one hundred ewes. There, as I intimated to you a minute ago, is one of the most difficult things in sheep hus- bandry. It is no easy matter,-I can tell you, to pick up one- hundred ewes and not get some with some disease, or some- thing bad about them, to be carried into your flock from the purchasers. When you go out to pick them up be very careful of whom you buy your sheep. Be sure that the wool looks thrifty, and does not look dead. Most any disease that a sheep is apt to have shows itself in the wool, to a man who knows. You can see it in the wool quicker than any place else. Be sure the wool looks lively and bright, and make sure that the eyes have a good appearance, because if you happen to get a few sheep with some eye disease you may ruin the rest of your flock. I did worse than that once. I bought some sheep with tuberculosis and ruined my whole flock, and I am pretty cute, I think, in buying sheep, too. It is a serious thing to buy sheep and put them on your farm. A mistake at that time may mean a heavy loss, so be very careful of whom you buy. Buy of some man that is responsible, and on whose representations you can rely. So let us suppose that our young man starts out to buy one hundred ewes. He ought to get them for three twenty-five, that are good enough to start with. Then he ought to have two good bucks, that might cost three hundred dollars. He ought to get good enough at that price. Then he ought to have about four hundred dollars to invest in tools and matters of that kind. Altogether it would run up to, say, about two thousand dollars as the total necessary investment. Then on top of that 44 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. | Jan., he ought to have a wife that could do the work indoors, and he should never hire a day’s work. He should do it all. He should not hire a butcher when he wants to kill any of his lambs or some of the flock to take to market, nor should he hire a sheep shearer when shearing time comes. If he wants to make money he has got to work. He should build his own buildings and take care of his own flock. Do it all himself. Now, I am going into this more particularly because I am exactly describing what I know a young man to have done. Now, he must have a ram, and he should take more pains in the purchase of his ram than he did in the purchase of the ewes. The main thing is to get a strong masculine character. I do not know of a better way of judging a ram, of deciding whether a ram is good stock or not, unless you can have him for two or three years, than by putting your hand on the back of his head and giving him a sudden blow like that. If he resists your blow well and strongly, do not question at all but he is a good ram. That is the general rule. It has not always proven true, but, as a general rule, that can safely be depended upon. On the other hand, if he ducks his head or his back at the pressure of your hand, do not touch him. Do not get too big a ram. Also make sure to get one with a good chest development. I should advise, in sheep and in the ram, that both should have what is classed as “ metal wool,” because this young man has got to do his own haying, and his sheep have got to rough it a little. He has got to attend to his own crops, and do it all him- self. He cannot drive his flock up every time it may be a little wet. With very coarse wool it will lie down on the back, and the water gets in and under it and into the skin, and the effect is bad. é Now, as to the food on which to keep his sheep; first, I should put in at least six acres of oats. He can do it if he isa worker. He should, also, put in at least three acres of rape and three acres of turnips. That is the first thing. One man can do it. The oats he should cut up when they are dead ripe. Cut them when they are dead ripe, and feed them on the trough. A poor man cannot afford to purchase a threshing machine. Now, he has no shelter for his sheep, and he may have no fences that are good against sheep. Of course, barbed wire is the only thing he can use. There is more or less to be said 1905. | SHEEP. 45 about that as a good thing to use, but, on the whole, it is about the only thing that he can depend upon nowadays. There is a little trick in fencing against sheep that I would like to explain to you. I never have been able to account for it, but I know it is true. A sheep will sometimes work its way through a barbed wire fence, however thick it is, and especially lambs will, if it is rigid, but if it gives a little to pressure when the sheep rubs against it he will not touch it. So where your lands will admit of it, put your posts fifty feet apart, or even more, as far as you can. Treat your fences liberally with a lot of staples. You must use about eight wires. I use nine. It is better to have the wires set rather thickly, in order to feel that you have got your sheep and lambs all in your pasture, but use just as good fence posts as you possibly can. It will, of course, help to diminish the cost, and will hold the sheep better than where you erect a rigid fence. The question of shelter is exceedingly important. An open shed, one that opens to the southeast or south, or in some locali- ties even to the east, is, of course, an ideal place for sheep. But I would prefer a good tight board fence, that is constructed high enough to give them shelter when they need it. That will carry them through the winter better than any barn cellar, for, as I said before, it is highly essential that the flock should have plenty of air. Anything that will break the wind is enough. Now, a sheep is more susceptible to draughts than any other animal. No animal will take cold quicker than a sheep will, nor will any other animal stand as much weather, but they must have a dry place in which to live. Sheep will not thrive if you keep them in a low, damp place. They want a dry, airy place. I have given no attention to getting my sheep under cover for the last eighteen years. They run, sub- stantially, over the same place in the winter that they do in the summer. Some of you may not agree to that, but it is no new way, and I think experience shows it is the right way. So the question of buildings on this farm that our young man starts off on is of small moment. They need not cost much. A thatched roof is all right for the open shed. An ideal roof is the thatched roof. It is all that is necessary. Anything that will break the wind from the northwest, and also some sort of winds from the south. There are two or three days sometimes when the flock should be protected from the south; 46 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., kept out of the way of south winds. Sometimes they blow raw, chilly, and damp, and then the flock should be protected. So it is well to see that the sheep pen or the shelter is arranged with that in view. There is another thing we have got to take into considera- tion. There is but one breed of sheep in the world that will not pack itself into a great cluster and literally smother them- selves, and only one breed in the world that knows enough to get on the windward side of the hill. So we have got to fur- nish brains for our sheep. It takes less work and more good judgment to take care of sheep than any other animal. Now, if the lambs sell well, and the wethers are to sell well, you must have a good market. You must watch the prices and know how to sell to advantage. With one hundred ewes, if a man will be careful in marketing his sheep, or the wool, he can, in a few years, pay the mortgage on his farm. He cer- tainly can do it. And in a very short time he can double his flock. It is quite within the possibilities in Connecticut to carry six hundred sheep on one hundred acres of land. I do not advise that, although I do more than that, I should not advise a man to aim for that at first, but it is easy to’carry six sheep to the acre and do it without much trouble. I know men who carry nine. That shows simply what can be done. So, in a few years our farmer, if he is careful and frugal, can own his place and be fore-handed. Now, let us take up the question of procuring food for the flock. JI have been in this business thirty-two years, and my experience certainly ought to count for something. I know this, that up to the present time a farmer in Connecticut should not have fed his sheep anything in the way of artificial feed. Sheep today, in this snow, are getting their living, and can do it very readily. You cannot do that with cattle, and there are only two or three other things that you can do it with. But I want to talk with you a little about rape. I will confine myself at present to rape. Now, it does not hurt rape to eat part of the plant in August. That may surprise some of you, but it is a fact. Furthermore, it is fully as good today, after it has been frozen, as it was before. In fact, for edible use it is better after itis frozen. Itisa wonderful plant. You can raise thirty tons to the acre. You should not attempt to raise less than that. It never should be planted before the 22d of June, and from that 1905. | SHEEP. 47 time on to the roth of July. About the 2oth of June is right. That gives you all the spring to harrow your ground and get all the weeds killed. You should fit the land for rape, as well as you would for cabbages. Of course, rape is of the same family. It must be rich land, and your rape will enormously exhaust your land. But rape, if you properly handle your crop, will help, in a measure, to refertilize the land. Rape is usually fed on the ground. It can only be fed to good advantage on the ground, so that your sheep will enrich the ground again, and they will not trample it to injure it any. They work from the side and take the ground clean as they go. Many news- papers and many writers on the subject say you must exercise great care for fear of their eating too much. I do not think that is true, unless we depend on rape for part of the year and then deprive the flock of it for a few days and then turn them in. Possibly they may overeat under such circumstances, but I think if we turn them in in the natural way, after the grass begins to grow better in the fall, they will then go at it very lightly. I have never known sheep to eat too much under those circumstances. I presume later in the season, if you were to take your sheep away and deprive them of it for two or three days, and then turn them in, they would hurt themselves. Another thing: always keep a box of salt in the field where your rape is. Do that in the summer and in the fall, and I think it is a good plan. Now, as.to the cultivation of rape, it matters little how you cultivate it, whether broadcast or in drills, but unless you have cleaned your land free and clear of weeds it is better to sow it in drills, and then cultivate with a horse when the fourth leaf comes out. I often sow it broadcast. A very little seed is as good as more. A pound to an acre is as good as twenty pounds. Twenty pounds does no more. A pound to the acre, if you had a man who would sow it fine, would be just as good as a larger quantity. The crop should be ready for the sheep in the fall, when the fall feed gives out. There is no feed, artificial or otherwise, with which you can make such good mutton, in a given length of time, as you can on rape alone. I feel perfectly satisfied of that, although some of my friends dispute it, but I have tried it and I feel quite sure that is correct. Furthermore, I feel perfectly satisfied that there is no mixture of grain that will make such good mutton, in a given length 48 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. { Jane, of time, as will rape alone. I think the experiments which have been tried in shipping sheep long distances are in favor of the rape-fed sheep over grain-fed. I think the Ontario experiment station sent lambs —I will not be sure whether it was lambs or sheep — to London, and the rape-ied sheep stood the shipping the best. The leg of mutton which I have here I happened to have on hand, and I brought it along to illustrate this point. This was a yearling wether. That is a sample of some mutton that was made entirely on rape pasturage. While I do not exhibit that quarter as a model leg of mutton, yet I do suggest that you will not find many better. It was made entirely on rape, and with- out any grain whatever. Of course, the strong point, and one of the points in connection with the raising of rape which I wish to emphasize before you, is that it is a great saving in your grain feed from the time your pasturages begin to give out until now. ‘That is the first point, and another point is that it is a capital feed on which to make first-class mutton. In my opinion there is none better. Following rape, I should have plenty of turnips, because there is a time in our climate when rape goes back on us and it is about this time of year. Sometimes it holds on until the middle of the winter. My sheep are on rape today, but you should have turnips to follow the rape, if you can. Of course, corn ensilage is an excellent feed for sheep, but there is nothing, in my judgment, like the plain, old-fashioned, rutabaga turnip with which to follow up your rape. White turnips constitute one of the best feeds sheep can have. White turnips will feed very well up to a month from now — up to about the middle of January. You can raise white turnips if you want to plant them in August, but after the middle of January white turnips do not hold very good. I should feed always whole turnips to sheep with full mouths. Of course, with lambs you must have the turnips cut. I think an old ewe likes her turnips best whole. There is no harm in cutting them at all, but I think an old sheep likes them whole the best. Now, with the farm such as I have described, and equipped as I detailed before you, our young man is in pretty good shape to start off in the sheep business. I should not advise that he turn off all his lambs the first year. He should carry them until the second year to begin with. After a while per- 1905. | SHEEP. 49 haps he could afford to do that, but for the first year it is better for him to carry them over if he can. Of course, he wants to increase his flock, and he should save about twenty per cent. of his best ewes and lambs for that purpose. Then, of course, the following year he gets a good fleece, and that helps to equal- ize the cost of carrying them over. Unless he is in urgent need of the money, the first year I think he should be willing to deny himself and raise sufficient crops to carry the sheep through until the second ‘year. He will be better off for it in the end. However, that is a matter for him to determine at the time. You cannot lay down any hard and fast rule in regard to that. Every man must be governed according to his own circumstances to a large extent. Well, suppose that fall is coming on; our young man wants some meat for his family. There is no place where he can get such good meat as right in his own flock. Of course, mutton is a winter meat. It is not particularly a summer food. Lamb is more like a summer food. He can take a good wether, and if slaughtered and cared for properly, no better meat can be had. Just let me give you a few directions in regard to that. Do not feed it anything for twenty-four hours before slaughter- ing. You will forget what I say about that now unless I bring that out clearly before you. Let me tell you why that is. It is because the undigested food in the sheep’s stomach, when it is slaughtered, is apt to flavor the meat. That is why it is best to fast the sheep before killing. Whatever you feed the sheep that remains undigested in the first stomach is apt to flavor the flesh if you kill it while it is undigested, but if you wait until it is digested and gone into the other stomachs, you get no bad odors in the flesh. You can give the sheep water it you like. Dress the sheep in a perfectly plain way. Do not try to embellish it with any fancy ornamentations, such as you see upon some carcasses that are hung up. Of course, you should not kill in fly time, but wait until the flies are all gone, until well along in November. Now, if your house cellar will keep meat without mould appearing on it, you are all right. After you have slaughtered your sheep if you will then hang your carcass in a cellar and take decent care of it, it will be all right to hang there until the next April, if you wish to have it, and it will grow better every day. It is not fit to use at all until it has been there a month. I used to think that the reason that milk AGR. —4 50 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [ Jan., soured in the pan was because it had to, but it does not. It is not a natural condition for milk to ever sour. I used to suppose that meat spoiled because it had to. But it was because I did not know anything about it. Investigations, however, have shown that milk need not ever sour, neither need meat ever spoil. Now, take this very quarter of mutton here, by way of illustrating. The first thing to do is to fasten back these loose pieces on the flank, so that the air can get in. Then if you were to hang it up in this room it never would spoil. There never would be any bad smell from it, but if you left it all night where I have left it here, it would spoil in twenty-four hours, or if you left two pieces of the flesh touching each other in a loose way, so that the air could not get in, it would afford a place where decay would commence. But if you hang it where the air can get at it, it will never spoil. Why? Because the air sears it over, dries it, and the microbes that are said to make all the trouble cannot get hold to do their work. It should never be kept moist. The moment it becomes moist it gives the microbes a chance to get a foothold. If it is dry it will never spoil. But suppose you leave it hanging up, and this blue mould that we sometimes hear about makes its appear- ance upon the meat. Do not let that frighten you. A small amount of it does not do any harm. You éat blue mould in other things and there is nothing unhealthy about it. If this blue mould gets started in some place on the quarter, where it has become a little moist, if you will carry the quarter out and lay it on a sawhorse, with the open space towards the sun, it will immediately kill it. Furthermore, a few drops of the oil of bergamot on the stone in the bottom of your cellar will kill anything of that kind which may be in the air. An ideal place in which to keep mutton would, of course, be in the back yard, where there is a free circulation of air, but, of course, in our climate we cannot do it, because of the extreme variability of the weather. Furthermore, I am afraid that some of our lady friends would not be able to bring themselves to think of doing such a thing as that. They think you must have some artificial place, but that is a mistake. A quarter of mutton hung up in the air would keep for a long time perfectly pure and sweet, whereas, if it was put in the refrigerator in a very short time it would not be fit to eat. I do not know why that is so, but I know it to be so. A little amount of mould may 1905. | SHEEP. 51 / gather, but it does not amount to anything, and as I said a min- ute ago, it is nothing that you need be afraid of. You throw that away anyway. If it troubles you just take a dry cloth and wipe it out. It will never mould on the outside after the air has had an opportunity to sear over and harden the surface of the carcass of the sheep. Mutton is a little different from any other meat in that the air hermetically seals the flesh, and it cannot get in and bring’ about the bad results which some- times take place. It is only where it can gather moisture on the inside that we need fear danger. Now, after it has been hanging for a month or six weeks, then the housewife can begin to use it. First she should begin by sawing or cutting into the flanks here and cutting out these pieces for stews. Then, next, the neck should be sawed off and cut up into pot roasts, and then gradually work up into the body. If the carcass is ripe to hang, as I have indicated, within six weeks there will be a chemical change take place in the fat of the sheep, so that it will not cling to the knife; neither will it cling to the roof of the mouth, and it will be as wholesome and sweet as any butter. People. say they do not like mutton, but most folks say that simply because they eat mutton before it is fit to eat. I want to tell you how to cook a leg of mutton. One way to cook it is to put it in a boiler with salt and water, and keep an account of the amount of water you put in. Boil it until you think fifty minutes more will finish it, and then put in a little red pepper, and put in one cup of rice for every five cups of water that you have in it. Cover it up and let it boil sharply for fifty minutes. Do not take the cover off. The important thing is not to take the cover off, because if you do you may burn your rice. But you can cook it in a tin pail if you wish to, and as long as you keep the cover on and boil it fast I will guarantee you cannot burn your rice. You simply pour the rice in and cover it right up and boil it as fast as you can. If you will do that I will guarantee that you will have as delicate a dish as can be eaten. Of course, skim off all the fat before you put in the rice. And then you do not care how fat the mutton is. The limits of an ordinary cellar or front room used for storage purposes must always have a first-rate place in which to keep mutton. I do not think that the temperature amounts 52 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., to so much as people sometimes think in keeping meat. An ordinary front room is an excellent place in which to keep mutton as long as you keep it hung up and pay attention to these few points that I have been speaking of. So that every man must have about his house somewhere a suitable place in which to cure his mutton, if he wishes to enjoy some of the choicest meat ever made to eat. Now, after you have killed your mutton you will find that it will not stand you in over seven or eight cents a pound, whereas, if you went out into the open market you would have to pay eighteen or twenty cents, I suppose, in Connecticut. There is quite a difference. Quite a saving. But you see that a farmer can have some of the very best meat for his table at a very reasonable cost if he will only exercise good judgment and carry out these plain little practical points that it is neces- sary to observe. If he will do that he can enjoy at his table such meat as is seldom found. Corned mutton is most excel- lent, but it should be given age before you corn it. If you do not, the fat will taste bad, and the lean will have no flavor. } Now, I do not believe in carrying a small flock of sheep on a dairy farm. There is a point I want to discuss. Some of you will be very successful, perhaps, in doing that, but I want to say to you that the buildings of an ordinary dairy farm are very unlike what a sheep wants, and if you have the cows, giv- ing them your principal attention, you are taking away things from the sheep and giving them to the cows. The sheep get neglected. I believe if you are going to keep sheep it is best to keep a sheep farm and pay entire attention to it. Although for fancy purposes, if you want thirty or forty sheep around, that is another thing. Ordinarily, however, it is much better to pay particular attention to one particular line. But if you go into it do not be afraid to keep a lot of sheep. If you can do better with one hundred and twenty-five sheep than you can with a hundred, you can do better proportionately with a thousand than you can with a hundred. You must provide facilities, however, for properly taking care of a large flock. I believe myself that you can do better with five thousand sheep than you can with fifty, proportionately, and I will tell you why. Ifa man only has a few sheep they are apt to be neg- lected, and he will not take the care of them that he will where he has a substantial investment in his flock. If a man keeps 1905. | SHEEP. 53 about twenty-five sheep around his barnyard they will get kicked and knocked around by the other stock, and compara- tively little attention is paid to them. But even then there is usually a corner into which they can escape, and they will be fairly successful. If, however, he has a large flock he will pay more attention to them, proportionately, and he will make more money. There is this to remember, however. A man ought not to think that he can keep a hundred sheep in a space adapted for twenty-five. That, of course, is modified by the circumstances and care which may be bestowed on the flock. It is quite frequently the case that a large number of sheep can be kept upon a small area of land, and be kept there profitably. It is not an unusual thing at all, in places where intensive farm- ing is carried on, for twelve hundred ewes to be kept in one flock on a comparatively small area. And the fact is you can do better with them because you can afford to have a man with the flock all the time and have them carefully watched and taken care of. In fact the best sheep I have ever seen were in large flocks. Do not be afraid, therefore, if your circumstances are such that you want to go into extensive sheep breeding, do not be afraid of a big flock, but use your multiplication table when you provide quarters for them. If you have ten sheep to feed you should provide trough room for twenty sheep. They will do enough better to pay for it. As I said before, sheep do not know very much. While there may be room enough for the whole ten at a trough built for ten, yet one will persist in crowding others out, and some will get too much and others will not get enough. . They do not know any better. They will crowd into one corner, or into one particular place at the trough, and pretty soon some of the sheep will get discour- aged and will not get up to the trough to get their share. When you go into the sheep business you should have sufficient trough space, so that when a sheep is crowded out of one trough it can turn around and go into another. So, if you have room for twenty, while you do not have but ten sheep, you can make sure that all can get their share. I think, therefore, it is a good rule to lay down, that you should provide just about double the trough space. If you have ten sheep, provide room for twenty. If you have a thousand sheep you should provide trough room for two thousand. Keep up that ratio and you will be all right. There is another thing: I never would feed in a sheep rack. 54 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [ Jamey I do not like it. It has been twenty years since I have used any kind of a sheep rack. I feed in winter on clean snow. I feed between times on the clean ground. In feeding grain I know a great many people use a trough ordinarily, but if you have a clean piece of ground, where it can be scattered, they will pick up every kernel of it. I should feed whole grain, if I had to buy grain. Now, it is a difficult thing for a man to handle, if he doesn’t know how to feed without a feed rack, but he soon gets onto it, and I believe after a man has become accustomed to using the other way he will like it better. Just let me illustrate that a little to you; we will say here is our sheep pen at the barnyard. It is simple enough. Commence near the pen and feed on the clean snow. Do not feed on the dirty snow, but shake it along the edge of the clean snow. Of course, they will gradually trample it down and the snow will become dirty, but all you have to do is to extend your circle. Just keep feeding along on the edge of the clean snow. Then when the next storm comes go back to the shed again. You can always feed on the clean snow, and there is no way in the world that you can get so much feed into sheep as by feeding over the clean snow and giving them an opportunity to gather it up. Never allow them to leave any. Do not feed them a lot of herd’s grass hay or timothy, or whatever you call it here. Do not feed them a lot of that kind of stuff that they cannot eat. If you do it will be wasted. Feed it to them gradually, and give it to them in such quantities that they will clean it all up. Make them eat it up clean. In feeding chopped corn- stalks and feeds of that character, apply the same principle. Do not allow them to leave a single piece. Make them eat it all up clean. It takes a little experience and judgment to start off with, but if you are careful you can soon gauge the amount of feed which they need, and by feeding on the clean snow, and on the ground, there need be no waste whatever, and in doing it you can make your sheep thrive much better than you can if you use a rack. I think that sheep ought to have some food of that kind, of course. I give them clover. Clover hay is the best hay, but any mixed hay is all right for hay. Also, any sort of weeds is all right for sheep, and they will make bet- ter mutton on it than they will on finer grades of feed. Sheep need water. That is, they require moisture. If they cannot get any moisture it affects them quicker than any other animal. 1905. | SHEEP. - 55 As I suggested in the opening, they must have some moisture once in forty-eight hours, and it should be left where they can get at it. I doubt, however, if the flock will ever touch water to any such extent as some of our friends think. I have rea- son to know that they do not. Still, without water, in a per- fectly dry place, where they could get neither dew nor water, they would die much quicker than the ox or horse. Another thing: it is important to keep salt before your sheep all the time. If I had a flock of sheep out on the mountains and could only get to them once a week, I should make it a point to salt them at least once a week. It is better, however, to have a box of salt in the field where they can get at it. If your sheep have not had any salt for some time, and it is then given them, they are apt to overeat it. But if you keep a box in the field, where they can get it when they want it, they will never overeat. Another thing, of course, which is a great element in the s success of sheep breeding, is to have a good market. You must have a good market. I apprehend that Hartford and New Haven are as good markets for sheep as exist anywhere. But you must have a good market, and then you want to deal with reliable dealers. I would not send a poor sheep to market. It pays to put only a first-class article into the market. Turn out a good_article and the people will soon find it out, and you will be getting good prices for your mutton. » There is a gentleman here who is to follow me, who will instruct you on the question of lamb raising. That is a branch of the business that I know very little about. Therefore, I have avoided that subject. I know of many men who have been very successful, and in Connecticut today I think an old- fashioned flock of sheep, from which you can turn off part of your wethers, and turn off an annual supply of wool, with some lambs, will abundantly repay you for your labor. Now, just a word or two in closing on the subject of diseases. You may think of all the ways you can to prevent it, and do everything you can to keep disease out of your flock, and yet sometimes it will strike you in spite of all you can do. That is quite true, however, of any live stock. I do not know that sheep are more likely to be stricken with disease, or are more susceptible to disease, and I am rather inclined to think perhaps they are not so much so as some other domestic ani- . 56 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., mals, yet the presence of disease is something which you must be eternally on the watch for. There are some diseases which it seems to be almost impossible to get rid of. In England they cannot get rid of the foot rot. They cannot get rid of the big liver. Neither of those diseases ever trouble you much in Con- necticut, but in all European countries they are more or less prevalent. It has been said that sheep could not be kept to advantage on damp, low lands, such as they have in Holland, but they have never given up the sheep industry in Holland. That is a country where they make every available piece of ground bear something. And, of course, water is all around it. And somehow or other they make the industry pay even there. So, too, in England. England has its fields that ten- ants are paying as high as seven fifty per annum rent per acre. They pay almost as much in the way of rent as your farm is going to cost you per acre. And yet, under such circumstances they raise sheep, raise splendid mutton, which they put upon the market and get fancy prices for. They have to get them in order to pay those enormous rents, but their method of sheep farming differs quite radically from ours, in that they keep a good many more sheep to the acre. There are a good many lessons which we can learn from the way they carry on the industry over there, and there is no reason why you cannot do well in the sheep industry and make it pay just as well as they do. It seems to me that you farmers in Connecticut have a good opportunity before you. As I understand it, you have plenty of land which can be used for sheep raising, and you have upon all sides of you plenty of good markets. It seems to me, also, that you are in no danger of very serious competition, so that you will most always be able to get good prices. It is not the sheep that are raised on the far western plains that are going to compete with you. You need have no fear of that. You can also sell your wool here and make a bigger profit on it than the farmers in the far west. It costs seven cents to get a pound of wool from Albuquerque to Boston, and you may be sure that the railroads will look out for their end of it and see that they charge enough, so that those farmers cannot compete with you, at any rate, seriously enough to crowd you out. There is room enough for all. So far, I have discussed the subject from the poor man’s standpoint, or from the standpoint of the man who has not the 1905. | SHEEP. 57 money to go into the raising of pure bred, high grade, sheep. But I want to say a word on that question, because some of you may have an inkling to do that. Now, in all of the great sheep raising countries of the world, where they run immense flocks, they cannot raise those flocks without constant infusion of new blood, because the climate is so dry that they cannot keep the quality in the wool. After a few generations the Colorado merino wool is as dry as a husk, and they have to use kerosene oil on their shears to keep them from sticking. So that every few years, and in fact all the time, those breeders have to draw on the eastern States, and on the middle States, for stock rams. So that in a dry place you do not want to go into merinos, neither would I advise the other extreme, the going into what is called one of the middle wools. There is no question, from a business standpoint, but what the business can be made profitable with that kind of sheep, but exactly as it is in other lines, you must know your business. You must know how, for the first few years especially, to han- dle the matter with a good deal of judgment. You must know how to build up your stock, you must know how to get good stock to sell, and to do that you must get good stock to begin with. Of course, the cheapest way, if you want to start off with fancy sheep, with English sheep, is to go to England and buy your sheep, and bring them over, and then you have got a foundation for the flock that is substantial, and which will give you a higher reputation in your community. I do not know of a more agreeable occupation, or one that is more likely to result well financially, than the breeding of pure bred sheep, but success in that depends entirely on the quality of your stock, on the output of the rams every year, and do not forget the important fact that among such kind of sheep fresh blood frequently is a necessity. Even in Australia, a country which is noted for the extent to which the sheep industry has been developed, they cannot raise their own foundation stock. For two or three genera- tions their rams are found to be all right, but they must have more new blood every little while, and in that way there is constantly being created a field for the introduction of pure bred stock. Now, gentlemen, I have taken up more time than I intended to take in the discussion of these questions. I do not pretend 58 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [ Jane, to know all there is about the sheep business, but I have learned a lot in my experience, and I would like to have any questions asked and I will do my best to answer them. Do not expect too much of me, however, for I am getting old, and I sometimes forget to bring out points that I intended to. Now, I hope that you will fire anything in the wide world that you have in your minds at me, and I will try to discuss your questions fairly, and answer them if I can. I thank you, gentlemen, for your kind attention. Secretary Brown. I simply want to say that while Mr. Harris has had the advantage of me for the last hour, I am going to get back on him now. I told him that he could not discuss the question of mutton until we had sheep, and that, therefore, sheep should be the subject of his discourse. But, like the minister when he takes his text, it usually doesn’t mat- ter what the text is, he is bound to give us the same kind of a talk. And so it has been with Mr. Harris. He got back onto mutton, although his subject was sheep. Now, after this very practical talk that Mr. Harris has given us, I know that some of you must have questions that you would like to ask him, and I hope that you will. Mr. YALE. I would like to inquire about rape. What kind of rape is the best to raise? I have been raising the Dwarf Essex, and my sheep seem to like it very fairly well. I would like to inquire, however, if there is any better variety. Mr. Harris. The Dwarf Essex is grown the world over, and is regarded as a very good quality. Mr. Yate. Does that grow large enough? Mr. Harris. Yes, the Dwarf Essex is practically used the world over. I have just landed from England, and over there, this year, the farmers are raising more kale than they have ever done before. Still, I did not find any of them that said it was better than rape. So I laid considerable stress on rape. Mr. Hinman. The gentleman said that his sheep are eat- ing rape now. Does his rape stand high enough so as to stick out above this snow? Mr. Harris. Yes. If you cultivate your rape fields right 1905. | DISCUSSION. 59 i you can drive a Jersey cow into it and not be able to see her back in the field. Mr. Seetey. A few words before we take up the next topic. We have heard the favorable side of sheep raising. I want to know something about the unfavorable side. We have got today, in the State of Connecticut, thousands of acres of sheep land back on the hills. We have been putting it largely into dairy farming, but those backlands, away on the hills, will not make milk very much longer, of the standard quality demanded nowadays, and the consequence has been that there has been a gradual withdrawing of our dairy herds from those sparse lands. Consequently, as the years have gone by sheep have commenced to roam over those sparse lands to a large extent, but I do not think that the industry compares very favorably with what this gentleman has been telling us in regard to sheep raising. I fully concur with many of his remarks, and I agree fully with him when he spoke about a man running a farm with so many sheep and so many cows, and running it all himself. That is the only way to make any money. And I am glad he has been thinking of those old men that lived ’way back fifty years ago, that did lots of work and saved their money. That is where they got it. I do not know whether the boys will ever do as their fathers did or not. I do not imagine that they will. I expected to see a large crowd of young people here today, and I am sure it would have been a great benefit to them if they could have heard what our speaker has told us. It would also show them what our fathers did in years past. I myself have been through just that kind of ex- perience. I can remember about how we used to go out on a frosty morning, barefooted, and run and stand in place where an old cow had got up, so as to get our feet warm. I am afraid that the boys nowadays would not be willing to do as some of us have had to do. Now, my question is, how can we make these back hill lands, these poor cheap lands, available today? As I view it, one 60 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., method is to use them for sheep culture, but there are some very serious drawbacks to sheep culture in Connecticut. We want to know how we can make sheep pay on these back hill lands, and particularly without interfering with our dairy inter- ests. I think there is just one thing we want to do. We have got to grapple with this question, and we have got to bring about conditions where we can raise sheep. We want to get back to sheep raising. There is no question about that. Why, I can remember when a farmer in my town used to have a large flock. I have known my father to have five hundred. They used to make money, and they saved money, and the boys today, I think, are spending it. I do not think there is any doubt about it. They used to make sheep farming pay, and I am sure we can do it again. It seems to me that the young men of today are not alive to their opportunities. I know, of course, it is some work to take care of a flock of sheep, but it can be done, and done profitably. You can turn off lambs and sell mutton, the old sheep, and sell the wool, and in fact everything that comes from sheep is most always cash, and there is everything about it to encourage sheep raising. I concur in about all that this gentleman has been telling us, but he has taken a very favorable outlook of the sheep industry. He spoke about the good land being devoted to that industry, where you could keep a large number of sheep to the acre. It has got to be pretty good land to do that, and, of course, our hill lots will not do it. But it seems to me if we can encourage the boys to see what can be done in this line that most any of us, even on our small New England farms, can keep from twenty-five to fifty, or one hundred sheep, right along, and with our general farming, and dairy farming, it will make a more diversified industry, which will interest the boys and help to keep them at home. Now, then, the great question is as to how we can improve our farming, so we can get sheep husbandry back in the State of Connecticut, and upon a paying basis. That is the question. 1905. | QUESTIONS. 61 In regard to that, I would like to say just one word. I have had some experience, and it seems to me that one of the first things we need is a little more strict legislation on the dog question. Back in the town where I live the selectmen have come to this conclusion, and have for about twenty-five years back, that they will simply pay for the sheep that are killed, and not those that have been bitten and injured, while the law says that a farmer shall be paid his damage. Now you can easily see where that has led to. Perhaps in a flock of fifty sheep there may not be but half a dozen killed, but it may be that the flock has been chased and worried and scared by dogs, and injured, so that it is a long time before it gets back to its normal status. May be they have been chased and they are scattered for miles, and perhaps you are obliged to spend one, two, three, four, five, and six days in a week in looking after them, and perhaps with a man or two, and perhaps never find them all then. That is the way things have been going on. It is wrong, and it is time it was stopped. The consequence has been that farmers in Connecticut have not cared to go into the sheep business. I do not blame them. Andi it has resulted from what I believe is an entirely mistaken policy upon the part of our selectmen. It seems to me that they ought to pay all the damages. I thoroughly believe in that, although I should have to help pay it myself. And there are a good many other things connected with it in regard to which it seems to me we ought to have a little more strict legislation and thereby encourage the reéstablishment of this important industry in the State of Connecticut. And then another thing I want to speak of. We have got to have a change in regard to this dog question. It is very often the case, as we pass along the roads, to see two or three dogs lying around a house, and in a good many cases the peo- ple who own the dogs are not able to pay for any damages that they do. What are we going to do about it? Why, the town has to pay it. There are lots of those dogs that do not pay a 62 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [ Jan., cent into the treasury, and our town authorities do not follow the matter up, and consequently there are a lot of dogs on ~ which no taxes are paid whatever. And a good deal of that is due to the fact that lots of people think more of their dogs than they do of the development of the sheep industry. And that is one of the first things we have got to do. We have got to get the sentiment in the State of Connecticut on the side of the sheep breeding question stronger than it is on the dog side. The dog sentiment today stands first. In a case I know of there was a man that had three sheep killed by a dog. The man who owned the sheep shot the dog. The man who owned the dog appeared and he says, ‘“ Here, you shot my dog.” " Yes,” he said, “he had ‘been chasing my sheep.’; ); dato much do you call your sheep worth?” He told him the amount, and the owner of the dog pulled out the money and paid him. Then he turned around to him and he says, ‘““ Now I want you to pay me for my dog.” “But your dog killed my’ sheep.” “Well, that is all right, I admit that the dog killed your sheep, and I paid you for your sheep, but that dog is my property and I want you to pay me for him, because you shot him.” “ How much do you ask for your dog?” “One hundred dollars.” “T won’t pay it.’ What was the result? The result was he was forced to go to law and finally had to pay for the dog and the expenses for fighting the suit. Now, gentlemen, under such circumstances as that there is certainly no encouragement for a farmer in Connecticut to go into sheep raising. We have got to have a change in that situation. So long as the dog sen- timent stands first you are simply driving sheep husbandry right out of the State as fast as you can. We want to get the sentiment on the side of the sheep business. It seems to me if we can do that it will overcome a good deal of the difficulty we are at present laboring under, and will thereby help us immensely along that line. Mr. STADTMUELLER. Mr. President, I would just like to emphasize the remarks: of the previous speaker and point out 1905. | QUESTIONS. 63 briefly the necessity for the existence and organization of the Connecticut Sheep Breeders’ Association. The lack of senti- ment in favor of the sheep industry can be overcome only through some organization like that. It seems to me that such an organization is a paramount necessity if we are to develop in Connecticut the necessary sentiment to reéstablish sheep industry. Now, I think it is true that as farmers we are a lit- tle too lax in espousing organizations to protect our personal interests. Modern industries are built up along lines of such close connection that farmers must get together in their various interests just the same as any other, and especially be ready to protect themselves. Nobody is going to protect. them, and nobody is going to protect the sentiment in favor of the devel- opment of the sheep industry except the men that are interested in it. You are not going to have any dog fancier do it, and you are not going to have anybody who is not interested in sheep. That is not to be expected, and we might as well give up all thought of it to begin with. It has got to be done by the sheep men themselves. We are the ones that must develop that sentiment. And in my judgment it is all our own fault that such a low state of sentiment in favor of the sheep industry exists in Connecticut at present. We must not complain, but I certainly feel that we have had ourselves to blame, in a large measure, for the situation which exists, but let us remember that and try, through the Connecticut Sheep Breeders’ Associa- tion, to develop that sentiment again. Now, as to the matter of town officials adjusting damages. As was remarked in my address, I believe very much could be accomplished if we had a good strong organization of sheep breeders, which would keep the breeders in this State active and interested in the matter, and prompt them to approach the town officials in cases where damages are to be adjusted. If we had an active membership that would notify the officials of the Sheep Breeders’ Association of such cases, and let the officials of the association get into touch with the selectmen, 64 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. | Jan., or if such members would ask them to assist them in such cases, and go out and meet the selectmen and explain the matter to them, that there are more ways than one of looking at this question, I am qyite sure it would result in great good. You cannot blame the town officials for being anxious to keep down the expenses of the town. It may have been a short-sighted, or a long-sighted, policy, according to the point of view you take of it, but be that as it may, it is up to you, as sheep breeders, to show our selectmen the error and to bring about a better condition of affairs. Otherwise, do not complain if our selectmen keep on the way they have been doing. I believe and have faith that the average selectman of the State of Con- necticut, if this matter is properly unfolded to them, and it was disclosed to them that through the encouragement of the sheep industry will come one of the means, if not the only means, of reestablishing land values, and that through the reestablishment of land values will come the reéstablishment of the grand list, and thereby the income of the town increased ; and that the only feasible way, the most direct way and the most practical way, of putting the business of the town upon a good basis, will come, in part, by encouragement of the sheep industry, I believe, as I say, if that matter is fully explained to our select- men they will cooperate heartily in what we wish to accomplish. We want a liberal interpretation or allowance for damage to sheep. Every one has got to work for it. We cannot get it through legislation. All we need is faith in the work, and to put our shoulders to the wheel and go to work and get it. If we do not we never will get it. Mr. Hinman. I must disagree, Mr. President, in one respect, with what has just been said. It is not pay for the sheep which have been killed that we have got to look out for. The whole trouble about this matter is simply this: you can- not regulate the dogs until you can get the farmers to stand together and take united action; until you can get the farmers (and I am sorry there are not more here that are sheep men), 1905. | QUESTIONS. 65 until you can get the farmers of Connecticut, until you can get the farmers in the General Assembly that is to meet next month to fight for a law that shall take care of the dogs, as they do in some States. If you can get the farmers in the General Assembly to stand up for a law that will take care of the dogs, that will settle the question. But so long as three-fourths of them will vote right against their own interests on such a matter as this, there is nothing that can be done in Connecticut. The very last time there was a bill brought up, our president said if you can get the dog fanciers and the sheep breeders to agree, we can get it through, but there was no use in talking about that. And yet it was a bill that ought to have been passed. There was no objection to it from anybody, because it was so simple and square and honest a bill that nobody could do anything against it, but when it came up to the farmers of the General Assembly they fought it as squarely as they ever fought anything on earth. The farmer loves his dog. You can do what you please, and you can say what you please, but until you can get the farmers of Connecticut to allow the men that keep sheep the same privileges that they allow those who keep dogs, it is absolutely useless to talk. Good mutton we can raise in Connecticut. There is no question about it. We can raise the best in the world in Con- necticut. I was up at Mr. Gold’s, some years ago, and he asked me to dinner. He said to me, “ Will you have a little of the mutton, Mr. Hinman?” I said, “ Why, yes; I am fond of mutton myself.” After I had got rid of the first piece he said, “ Will you have a little more?” And I said, “ Mr. Gold, it seems to me you make a mistake in calling that mutton. It seems to me you should have asked me if I will have a little more lamb. ‘That tastes more like lamb to me than mutton. When it comes on winter, then, if you ask me if I will have a little more mutton, I should think that was appropriate.” He turned around, and he said, ‘‘ Charles, how old was that old ewe?” The fact was it was an old Southdown, which had been AGR. —5 66 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., fatted nicely, and it was nicer than any lamb I ever ate in Hart- ford. It was raised on the Litchfield county hills, and it had not been shipped all over the country before being prepared for eating. It was as nice mutton as I ever ate in my life, and if he had not inquired of Charles how old it was I never should have known but it was lamb. We have got the best land in the world to keep sheep on, because it is sheep land, and it is land exactly adapted for what sheep want. The only objection, and the only hindrance in the way of the development of that busi- ness is the dogs, and we cannot get rid of the dogs until the farmers of Connecticut say so. A Mempser. Mr. President, I would like to hear about the raising of lambs. I would like to hear the gentleman speak that was going to speak on lambs. President SEELEY. The gentleman is going to speak on lambs now. I was just about to introduce him to you. We have brought a gentleman from Ohio, who is now going to address us on the lamb question. His address will follow right in and supplement the one made by the gentleman from Ver- mont. It gives me great pleasure to introduce to you Mr. Joseph E. Wing of Mechanicsburg, Ohio, who will speak to you on the subject of “ Money in Lambs.” MONEY IN LAMBS. By Mr. JosepH E. Winc of Mechanicsburg, Ohio. Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen: It gives me a great fleal of pleasure to come here and speak to you today, even though I am somewhat unacquainted with the conditions pre- vailing in your country. Of course, I have read a great deal about your abandoned farms, and I did not know exactly just what condition New England agriculture was in, so I came down here today with a great deal of anticipation, thinking I would see something of the far-famed New England country towns, but I have not seen very much. I came down from Canada, and on the way down from Montreal, through Ver- mont and Massachusetts, I saw but very little of your land, but I have been charmed with what of New England I have seen. 1905. | MONEY IN LAMBS. 107 Now, about ‘ Money in Lambs,” and how to get it out of them. Iam very sorry there are not more young men here to hear me. It seems to me your New England farmers, in view of what I have been told, have a great opportunity before you, and perhaps some of these things that I will say may be of advantage in helping you to develop that opportunity. Of course, it is almost impossible, especially before a New England audience, to say anything new, and I do not know whether I can really do much good or not. But I am going to tell you how we carry on this branch of farming in Ohio, and if you can apply it to your conditions here in Connecticut I should be glad. If you cannot, I am only sorry that I have wasted my time and yours in coming here. Perhaps, to make what I shall say to you later a little clearer, I should say something first about the conditions that obtained on the farm where I first undertook the business of lamb rais- ing. Thirteen or fourteen years ago I came back to Ohio from the far west. I had a good position in the west. I was manager of a large cattle ranch, and I had a pretty good position; with a good outlook for the future. I came back to my old home in Ohio because my father had gotten old and wanted me to come home. When I had been there my father and I had been sort of partners on the farm. We had sort of grown up together, and when I was a little boy he made me his confidant, and I knew how to do all sorts of things. So when I went west I was pretty well equipped in the knowledge of farm work, as it was carried on in Ohio. It was certainly a great advantage to me. I became rather restless and left my home in Ohio and went out to the far west, and lived there for a number of years. Then I got a letter from my father telling me that he wanted to have me come back to the old farm. So I gave up my position and came back to Ohio. You have your problems here. We have our problems out there. Your farms are being deserted, they tell me. Your farms are not productive, especially on the hills, they tell me. Our farms present some discouraging features, as I shall detail to you a little later. When I came home to that old farm I found the same conditions there, almost, as existed when I went away. I remember as though it were yesterday, the day I stepped off the cars in 1889. It was just about this time of year. Just 68 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., about a week later than today. It was the day before Christ- mas. I remember how happy I felt when I stepped off the cars and started off toward the old home of my father. I started to walk over the four miles, going home to my father’s farm, and it was with a feeling of elation that I kept discover- ing upon every hand things with which I was familiar in my boyhood. I remember how happy I was to see it all. And I remember very well how happy I was when I stepped on an old bridge and saw the water running beneath, and saw the little fish darting here and there, just the same fish, it seemed to me, that I had left there when I went away. And it seemed to me as if they were there to welcome me back to the old home. And when I got near the old place I stood there gazing on my old father’s farm, and how familiar and fresh everything appeared to me. It seemed to me like getting back to heaven. After the first raptures of home-coming were over, my father said to me, “ Let us go out and look at the place.” We went out, and oh, how the old farm had changed. My father had changed, too. I could hardly think it was the same place. We used to think it was a fairly rich farm, and that we were fortunate in having such a good place, but somehow or other it did not seem to look just the same any more. Years before I used to think it looked so big, but after coming back from those great plains in the far west, oh, how small it did appear to me! I never shall forget how it came over me, and it did not seem as though I should be able to adjust myself to those new conditions. There was the barn that I used to think was so large, and I well remember how proud I was the first time I filled that barn with hay. I began to think what I could do, and the more I thought of it the more restless and discontented I became. I tried not to show my discontent, but my father saw that I was restless, and he said, “ My boy, now I suppose it is true that you did a great business in the west. I suppose it is true, as you say, that you had two thousand head of cattle to look after.” I do not believe that the old gentleman ever believed it was true. But I remember very well how he went to the shelf and took down his account book. He was a New Englander himself. He always kept an accurate account of everything. If he owed a man that man got it.- If that man owed him anything he got it too. He showed me that old account book, and showed me the hay he had cut, the wheat, 1905. | MONEY IN LAMBS. 69 and all he had sold off the farm that year. Footed it up, and the total amount — how much do you think it was? A little less than seven hundred dollars. Why, my heart sank like lead. JI had given up a place that paid me a salary a great deal better than that. And I thought, “ What have I come home to a farm for where the whole receipts are less than seven hundred dollars a year?”’ I did not know what I should do. What do you suppose the first thing I did was? I simply had to make up my mind to make the best of a bad matter and see what could be done. I said I have got to go to work and do all the work myself. I have got to get up at four o’clock in the morning to feed and harness the horses, milk the cows, and clean the stables, and do all this drudgery. Got to do it all myself, because I cannot afford to keep a hand on a farm that only yields a total of seven hundred dollars a year. Father saw how I felt about it, and he said, “ My boy, I used to make more money when you were with me before, but times have changed. I am getting old, and hired men are no good any more.’ It seems to me that I have heard that several times today. I have an idea, I know, they are with me, that hired men are necessary. It all depends on your getting the right man. But to come back; my father said to me, “ My boy, I want you to go ahead and do anything you want to. You go ahead and do what you are a mind to, and let me help you. Let me be the boy.” I could not help but think of that this morning when the president of Trinity College was talking, when he told about his father turning the grindstone while he ground the scythe. That was about my situation. It took me a long time to adjust myself to those new conditions, especially after what I had been used to in the far west. I never did become entirely adjusted to it, but when I heard him tell that story this morning it seemed as though I just fitted into the story.’ Well, I went out and looked over the farm, and began to calculate what had to be done. I saw a field which I thought might serve some of my purposes. It was a wet, damp, poor kind of soil, a wet, sticky, miserable soil, and I looked at that land, and I could not help but think of some I had seen in the far west. There was no help for it, however, so I said to my father, “ Father, I am going to drain this plot.” I got right down to digging ditches, and dug ditches most all that winter. 70 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., I am telling you all of this because it has its application in what I am to say to you a little later in regard to what I did on that place. I put in tile, and succeeded in making that old field dry. I did not care what it cost. I had made up my mind that I would make there something that would pay. I had made up my mind that in that wet, cold ground, as the result of work, I would make it dry, and make it yield something worth while. I made up my mind that I would make it rich, so that clover could grow on it; so that somebody, even if I did not do it myself, would be able to keep more stock. I intended, of course, to avail myself of it, and I was determined some day to make that thing pay. I used to talk with my father about it, but he had been used to a different order of things. He had faith, however, in my push, and he said to me, “ You will never believe what can be done here until you try it. Go ahead and do whatever you are a mind to. If you do it, then you will believe it.” Well, I went to work on that farm. I had always thought of raising lambs, more or less, but the only trouble was I had not thought of it enough. The idea at that time did not come to me what possibilities there were in that business. But all this work that I was doing, as it turned out afterwards, was simply preparatory, and was work which needed to be done. The farm was poor. The first problem that I had to face was to build up the fertility of that farm. I well remember the first summer. I had to face the same kind of a problem that many of you here undoubtedly have had to face. I said to my father, “I want bigger fields. I want more room. I want to keep more stock.” I had made rich a little spot on that farm, but the most of it was poor. I was anxious to make it do the best it could. I said, “Father, I am used to more cattle and more stock. We haven’t any sheep. We have only a few cat- tle. I am used to more cattle than we have here. I am not satisfied to take care of six or eight head of cattle. I have been used to taking care of large numbers. We must arrange things here so we can take care of a good many more than we have.” I thought at that time that we could. I told my father that I thought I knew how it could be done, and that I was going to try it. He said, “ Go ahead and try it if you want to.” I went to work with a will at that farm. I tore out some of the wood and brush and scrubby portions of some of the fields on that farm. I tore out some of the fences and made another 1905. | MONEY IN LAMBS. a field. I laid out a new land and made an entire new arrange- ment out of that old farm. I remember how that first summer I went back and forth between the fields and the barn and the house, and I could not help but think, as I looked over that place, how far it fell behind what it ought to have been, and how far short it was of the land on the prairies of Illinois, Kan- sas, and Nebraska, that I knew so well. That thought ran in my mind all the time. That was one trouble with me. I could not be content to carry on farming as we were compelled to do on that small place in Ohio. I could not see to my entire satisfaction, at that time, how it could be made to pay. I said to my father, “ This land is poor. It does not pay to carry on farming here and raise crops to compete with those raised on the prairiés of the great west.’ I said, “I think we make a great mistake. This soil has got to be made rich before we can raise crops with which we can compete with the west in farming,” and so I constantly took counsel with myself and studied how to make improvements; how I could bring that land up to a high state of fertility, where it would raise good crops that would pay some money. I knew that it had run down. I knew that something must be done. I did not know then of the fertilizing power of clover and other legumes. I knew about stable manure, and about the advantage of keeping live stock on a place, but I did not see how I was going to bring that farm up to a high state. And right here I want to tell you a funny thing. It has nothing to do with sheep in the world, but it does explain how I solved that problem, in part. A mile and a half away was the village, where they wasted a good deal of their manure. It was a village of a couple of thousand inhabitants, and I could buy the manure for twenty-five cents a load. I thought that was going to solve my problem. I made a great wagon box, wide and deep, a regular hay rack, and I had a big pair of Per- cheron horses, so that I could draw a big load. Then some- times, when some man sent me word, I would go up to the vil- lage and buy it and draw it out to the farm. I felt mighty glad when I got those big loads of manure, and I would just think to myself, as I was going home, ‘“‘ Why, in this stuff I have got something which I can spread out there, which will bring my farm up, and where it will be forever.” And so I pushed the horses along as fast as they could walk. I felt 72 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., that I had a solution of my problem. And do you know that on those loads of manure I felt mighty proud sitting or standing there on that load hauling it home, although it is not always a fine thing, in any sense, to sit or stand on a load of manure. But I felt in drawing that down there that I was soon going to make that country rich and more like the lands in the far west that I had known; into a land that should be rich and black as the land of Illinois. But I said I was going to tell you a funny thing. I was riding out on one of those loads one day when I saw a carriage coming. I thought I must pull to one side so as to let the carriage pass. I recognized who was in the carriage. Out in that country there was living there then, and there is living there yet, a real nice man, a very cultured and refined man, who had some beautiful daughters. I knew them. They seemed to like me well enough when I had my good clothes on. And sometimes I used to meet them when I did not, but that did not seem to make any difference. How- ever, on that occasion I perceived one of those young ladies, and I thought, “ There comes Miss , and I will have to get out of the way with the wagon and give her a chance to get by, and when she gets up even with me I will give her the nicest bow I know how.” As she approached me she did not look at me. I thought, “ Why, that is funny,” but presently when she got right up within a few rods of me I saw some- thing happen which surprised me; that poor girl had been stricken with blindness and couldn’t see me at all; never looked at mein going by. At first it was with a feeling almost of rage, and then I thought, “ You can go by me in that high and mighty way if you are a mind to; with all your chances in life,” I thought, “ and with all you enjoy, and with all your value, and your farm to boot, I would not have that spirit to go by an acquaintance because he happened to be on a load of manure. Is it nothing to you, young woman, that I can draw this load into a field where the field is dry and barren, where nothing grows; that I can drive in there with a load of manure, and by the use of that cover it deep with clover or corn; that I can make grain grow and raise good crops? Is it nothing to you, young woman, that because of this I can make that farm fertile and in time make a home for that sweetheart of mine and those children I hope to have some day?” So, full of these thoughts, I drove into the field and began to throw down big 1905. | MONEY IN LAMBS. 73 forkfuls, and as I took it out I said, as I threw it onto the ground, “ There is one and there is another. Now you be good, and you be good, and you do the best you can for me.” But I found after a while that I did not have to haul out manure from the town. I did not build up the farm with it as I expected, and then I began to think what I could do. I saw that I could not build up the farm fast enough in that way. Of course, it was valuable enough in itself, but it cost too much to draw it out. Then I turned my thoughts to other things. My father had never kept much stock on the place, and what he had kept had perhaps been of the wrong kind. I wondered what Icould do. Then I thought of sheep again, and [ thought of lambs. I said, “ Here is a little lamb. Is there any money in him?” We feed him while he is a baby. I grasped at the idea. I thought possibly there was a solution of my problem. And all my life I had been taught how much easier and how much less food it took to make a baby grow than an old animal. I said to myself, “I am going to try lambs and see what can be done.” So I went out and bought a couple of hundred lambs. They were lambs that had been born in the spring. I took them home and put them in the barn. I bought the littlest ones I could find, because I hadn’t the money to buy larger and more expensive ones. I had to borrow even as it was. I was living alone on that farm, without any money to go on with, and I had to do the best I could. So I bought the littlest ones I could. I built a place for them and commenced to try my experiment. There I fed them, there I took the best of care of them, and began to study how I could do the best with them. And I want to say this, for the encouragement of the business, that I never have yet fed a bunch of lambs that did so well as that first one. It was a great experience for me. And I was just as careful as I could be with them. If I had been feeding a typhoid fever patient I could not have been more patient and careful with them. They grew to like me, and I grew to like them. They would keep all around me and nibble at my coat tails, and put their noses up into my hand, though if I would try to touch them they might run away. I would stand and look at them. I tended them with the utmost care and in the best manner I knew how. They weighed fifty-six pounds on the average when they went into that barn, and as the result of my care and attention, I believe, they weighed a 74 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [ Jan.. hundred and eight pounds and a half when they went out late that spring. Was not that a triumph? I did not lose one. Not one in all that whole winter. I have never done that well since, but as a result of that experiment I made that one winter a profit of one hundred and fifteen dollars on those lambs. That was enough for me. I said, “I am going into the lamb business.” I made one hundred and fifteen dollars, and that was after I had figured all the work and all the feed, together with the cost of the flock. A clear profit of one hundred and fifteen dollars. Then I said, “ Now I begin to see daylight. Now, it is only a question of having enough lambs, and I will make this thing pay.” In my prosperity I kept it all to myself. I did not even tell my wife. I said, “Some day I will feed a thousand lambs on that farm.’ I did not tell anybody of it. They would have thought I was foolish. Today there are on that farm a thousand lambs, and a hundred breeding ewes helping me to raise that flock. They are all being fed on that farm. I had to borrow money to do it. I would not advise everybody to borrow money, but I did it in my case and got out of it all right. I was a little astonished to hear this good friend of mine, who addressed you this morning, advise you to do the work yourselves. We tried that, my brother and I. I called them home, just as my father did me, and my two brothers are there feeding sheep today. We tried to do all the work first, and then we began to hire some helpers, but we did not do so until we thought we were in a position to hire some additional help. We tried to keep it all for ourselves and turn the results of our labor into money. We were quite successful. Of course, with the increase of the business we had to increase our facilities for handling the flocks. We had to make money then on the farm. We had to build barns. We had to pay out.a good deal of money for our sheep, and we did not always pay our own money. Sometimes we had to borrow. .We borrowed a good deal. I do not advise any one to borrow money, but I am just telling what we did. We had to borrow money until the debt got pretty heavy. We had faith to be- lieve, however, that it would be all right. We had faith in the enterprise, for this reason: that while the debt was going up all the time the prospect of final success kept growing brighter. The prospect of success was beyond anything we had expected. I saw that the farm was producing better. We had our fences 1905. | MONEY IN LAMBS. 75 in good shape. We used to take care of our fences and do some work on the farm in between. Just living half the time be- tween the flocks and the fields, and during that time we made over some of the poor spots, improved the whole farm, until we finally got it so that we could take care of a thousand lambs. We kept hard at work, and finally, four years ago, there came a good year, when we had a thousand lambs on the farm, all as fat and sleek as they could be; all in the best of condition possible to send to market and realize good prices. I sold them out, and, of course, when the checks came back, one at a time, we were in a position to get out of debt. I never did anything in my life with greater satisfaction. I took those checks and laid them on the banker’s counter and asked him to take out what I owed him and let me know what balance I had left. I knew him well. He used to come out to the farm and look at things, now and then. I suppose he wanted to see just how things were. I told him I wanted to pay every cent that I owed him in cash; everything that I owed anybody I wanted to pay in cash. We owed this banker a lot. I had not figured it up to know just how much we did owe him, but I said to him, “ Now I have got money enough to pay that debt, to cancel all the notes which you have against me, and I want to pay that, and then I want you to tell me if I have anything left.” He figured up for a minute and handed me back a bank sheet showing the state of my account, and showing me that I was on the right side of the books. I had almost six hundred dollars in clear money. I was surprised and delighted. The farm was all paid for, and we were out of debt. We were all right then, because we were out of debt. That was a happy day. I went home and told my wife about it. When she saw me coming she stood in the doorway waiting for me to come, and when she saw my face she knew the story, and we were both of us so happy we could not say a word. Then we figured that night what we had made in profit on the farm, and we found that we had made more than twenty-five hundred dol- lars on that same farm, which had only given us a gross return when we began of seven hundred dollars. And there has not been a year since that we have not done as well. Cleared away all the debts, cleared away all the poor spots on the farm, so there are not any any more. We have moved the line fences back, and have built two new homes on the farm, one for my 76 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [ Jan., brother and one for myself. That is what the sheep have done, or the lambs, and that is why I have the courage to stand here and talk to you about them. There have been two branches of the sheep industry which we have followed. The first is, where we buy the lambs and fat them ; but, of course, there is more profit in having the lambs born on your own farm, and feeding them to fatten them, than there is to buy them outside. It is much better to do that on the farm than it is to go to the trouble and expense of finding and purchasing the lambs. I am going to talk to you about that in the first place. Of course, one of the most impor- tant things is to make sure that the flock is well taken care of, but it is hardly necessary for me to say much about that now. Mr. Harris has discussed that question. I am glad that Mr. Harris has given you the good instruction he has about the care and breeding of the flock. That is a very important point. That is what we believe in, and what we try to do; that the ewes especially shall be strong and well nourished when they go into winter quarters. If the ewes are strong and in good condition, you will have strong lambs when they are born, Of course, in that connection the question of feeding is an important one. I feed some rape, and approve of it, the same as does Mr. Harris. I do not feed it quite so long as he does, because I do not have quite so much feed. Besides rape I have to have some dry clover hay. We want the ewes to be strong and well nourished, and not fat like this quarter which Mr. Harris exhibited to you. Ewes for breeding purposes should not breed too fat. You want them to be well nourished and strong, but not too fat, and then when the lambs are born they will be strong. I believe what he says is all right about their taking a walk out doors every day and having plenty of exer- cise. Sheep, of course, as he says, need plenty of air, but I would like to tell you that our barns are so built that they are almost like out of doors. We have them so arranged that clear along on one side is a raised door, or a door which is attached by hinges at the top, and which we can raise or lower at will. Then if the wind blows from that side we can close down that side and protect the flock, and give them plenty of ventilation from the other side. Or if there is a regular bliz- zard we can close down both sides and ventilate from overhead, and so protect the flock from chilling winds. Our sheep are 1905. | MONEY IN LAMBS. “hy always put in the barn at night. We do not want to run the risk of having little lambs born out in the snow bank. It is a good deal better if the lambs can be born early, and if the flock is well taken care of there is no reason why they will not do as well. We do not find any more loss among them by being born in cold weather, but it is because we look after them carefully. Many and many a time I have gone with my wife to look in the pens among the sheep to see if the little ones were strong and all right, and if the ewes were all right. So bear those two points in mind if you are going to raise lambs for money. First, not to let your ewes get too fat, and, second, to take the very best care of your flock, so that the little lambs will always be born strong and well. Now, another point. When the lambs are born we just simply make a little pen in the barn, that is made up of two pieces hinged together, two panels like, like the two sides of a gate; we take that and put it up in some corner in the barn. It is made just so that it opens and fits into the corner, the out- side corner being hinged together at the ends. We take that and put it up in some corner of the barn, and it makes a little pen something like four feet square. Sometimes we use that and put the ewe in it, particularly when it is necessary for her to have careful attention. Then when the little lambs are born we put them with the mother. We believe that that is an important thing, and it is certainly a saving of expense. In that way it makes it very easy. We do that for several rea- sons. In the first place, an old ewe does not know her lamb except by the odor, and the lamb only knows its mother by the call. They have a good deal of individuality, and we think it is a good policy to always shut them up a little while. Of course, after the lamb is born the udder of the ewe will be full of milk, or should be if the ewe is in good breeding condition. An old ewe will always own her lamb if her udder is full of milk, and that is one of the points that we are careful to look out for. If she has not got plenty of milk she will not own her lamb. We try to raise the lambs, or to give them a good start, on their mother’s milk. After a ewe has been parted from her lamb we can still use them, and we try to encourage the ewes to adopt other lambs, and so we keep them at work in that way. We place them in a pen and put the lamb in with them and try to make them own them, and as a usual thing they will 78 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., do so as long as there is a good supply of milk in their udders. After the lamb is born then our method is like this: There should be two or three pens for lambs of different ages. We put them by themselves and then begin to give them, gradually at first, a little more variety of food. We also do the same thing with the old ewes. We begin to give them a little richer feed, so as to increase the ewe’s milk, not only to increase the quantity, but so she will give it up more readily. Then, too, we always pay careful attention to this fact: For a week, after the little lamb is born, we milk her out every day, clean. That should be done particularly in cases where the lamb is unable to take it all. If we do not want to do that, if we have got a big lamb that can take it, we catch the old ewe and put this lamb on, and he will usually clean her out good. Generally we will have half a dozen that we are able to use for that purpose. You see if a ewe gives more milk than the lamb can take, of course, the milk is not all taken out, and that interferes with the length of time that the ewe stays in milk. It is an easy matter, in such cases, to arrange so as to have lambs that will run up and clean out the ewe. Of course, there are good reasons why the lamb should take what it can after being born. It is the natural method, and a lamb needs that for medicinal reasons. It does not do to take them away too quick, certainly not for three or four days, as it is very apt to kill them. Our ewes are such large milkers that the little lambs almost never can take it all, and so we have a surplus to use for others. We find that fact a strong element in our success. We try to increase the milk- giving habit of the ewes, because we want to hurry that little lamb along into quick, fat mutton. The lambs, too, must have a chance to be by themselves. We cannot hurry them along as fast as it is desirable, we cannot go to that extreme just on the mother’s milk alone. So in some corner of the barn we pen off a little pen — not too little — in some place where it is easier for the lamb to get into it than anywhere else, making it where it is natural for them to get to it, and placing it where the ewes are all around it. The pen should be made with panels wide apart, or pickets spread from one another, so that the lambs can run through easily. I find that our ewes cannot follow the lambs into these little pens if we have the pickets” about seven inches apart. -These little pens should be placed so that the lambs can run back to their mothers and placed so h 1905. | MONEY IN LAMBS. 79 that the old ewes cannot follow. That, of course, gives us a chance to separate the little fellows from the ewes, and to feed them separately. In these little pens we put a flat-bottom trough with a board over it, so that the lambs cannot get in, you know. In that trough we put ground feed at first. I do not care very much what you put in, wheat bran with a little linseed meal with it, or a little cracked corn, or even some wheat middlings. I do not like that so well because it is too floury. Wheat bran and a little cracked corn, with parts of linseed meal, is what I use most. They will not eat it for ten days or two weeks unless you educate them a little. If you are careful to train the little fellows to eat, and if you accustom them to being handled, there is no trouble to hold them up, and pretty soon they will like it ; they will not object to that, and then you can take a little of this stuff in your hand and put it in the little fellow’s mouth. Put your hand up to hfs mouth and may be all at once he will find out it is good and commence to eat. Then give him some more, and some to some of the others to eat, and pretty soon they will all follow that example. It is surprising to see how quickly they will do it sometimes. I have often used a little coarse brown sugar in order to encour- age them to eat a little quicker than they otherwise would. After they get to going then give them all you can possibly get them to eat. That doesn’t mean that you can put it in in great quantities and leave it there all the time. That is not the way to get them to eat, because if they go there and find the feed always there they simply nose it over and somehow or other it becomes distasteful to them,.and they do not take so much of it. They will not eat so much. I do not know whether these boys here before me know how to keep in a girl’s good graces. There is a little lesson in this, so let me tell it. When you go to see a girl, if you leave just five minutes before she wants to have you go, the next time you go to see her she will say when she sees you coming, “ There is that fel- low coming again. I am glad to see him, because he never stays too long.” If you stay just five minutes longer than she wants to have you, then what does she say? Why, she sees you coming, and she says, “ There is that fellow coming again that bored me so the last time he was here.’’ That applies to lambs also. If they have a little bit less than what they want to eat they will come back with a big relish the next time. For 80 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., that reason we try to feed them so they will eat up all that we give them, and get good and hungry by milk time. If there is a little bit that is not eaten up we take it and give it to the ewes. I want to emphasize this point. I do not know whether I have brought out this idea with sufficient force to make it as clear to you as I would like to. There is a great deal in han- dling the flock in a perfectly natural way. Handle the ewes and lambs so naturally that it will seem perfectly natural for them to run in and out among each other, and by having these pens placed as I have described that goes a great ways towards keeping the flock contented, as it allows the lambs to mix with their mothers, and they do better in consequence. Lambs do not want a hothouse. I think I have already told you that they want plenty of good fresh air. I do not mean by that that they can stand it*to be kept in a cold or damp place. They cannot. They do not want a cold place, where the wind blows through. They want to be protected from strong winds if possible. It is better to have a place that is open to the south, if open at all, with the wind all shut off on the other side. The place should be arranged in such a way that the wind can be shut off in the direction from which it comes. Now, when the lambs will dress from thirty to forty pounds they are ready to go to market; to ship to New York, to New Haven, or any other place where there is a good sale for them. I do not know much about your local markets. I know what the markets are in our large western cities, and after figuring up the cost of raising you will find that they have cost you less per pound to produce, by reason of shipping them off in the way I have been describing to you, than they will if you carry them on for a year. They will bring you from six or eight to ten dollars apiece, and sometimes even more, and it is almost like finding money. When you take them away from the ewes then you can put others on. Perhaps there are twins, and one of them needs more help and nourishment than the other. Just take an old ewe that has parted from her lamb and put her in her pen, and try her to see whether or not she is milking in good shape, and if she is, and she objects, just put her neck in the stanchion. All that is necessary is to keep her quiet, and to prevent her from running around. I just drive two stakes down and tie 1905. | MONEY IN LAMBS. 81 them together and then put the twin lamb in with the ewe, and with the twin there, if she does not kick too much, he will help himself. After he has taken nourishment from this foster mother for a few days she likes it just as well as though it was her own, and she will raise him. If you do not want to do that you can simply catch her once or twice, or three times a day, and let the little fellow clear the ewe out while you hold her. Perhaps it may be necessary, if the lambs are quite young, to milk her out afterwards, but that is not usually so. After she has served your purpose, and when it is necessary to dry her up, if you will stop the grain feed and give her some timothy hay, that will do it every time. The little lambs are fed. It is better sometimes to feed them so as to shove them along as fast as possible. Of course, you want to get them into market as soon as you can. I will give you my ration that I give them first. It is corn meal and wheat bran, equal parts of wheat and meal. I put in about ten per cent. of coarse ground linseed meal or oil cake, as the Englishmen say. I find that that agrees with them first rate, and they do very well. I give them a low trough and let them eat all they want. What they do not eat I give to the ewes. The soy bean, such as you grow here, makes the best thing I know of to furnish the protein for lambs. I believe that is grown here, as well as with us, for that purpose. We do not have any trouble in growing it, and I do not think you will have here. At least that is the way I understand it. The principal thing to be aimed at in selecting the food and fattening the lambs, is to get them into condition to be sent to market as soon as possible. This method of grain feeding, mixed with the mother’s milk, makes the cheapest lamb food I know of, and they seem to do the best on it. They will always bring a good price. I cannot quite agree with my brother here when he advises you to carry them over whether your prices are good or not. I do not believe in that. I believe in letting them go and not being obliged to incur the expense of keeping them. Let them go while they are young. The babies are the things that pay in this world, especially in the lamb business. Now, if you have any questions to ask I shall be very glad to afiswer them. Acr. —6 82 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., Mr. Hinman. What kind of fences do you use? Mr. Winc. Nowadays we are using almost altogether wire fences. We find that wire fences serve our purpose, and we are able to make them dogproof without much trouble. Perhaps if our country was situated the same as some of yours we could use some other fence to advantage, but I do not think you can make any fence dogproof so well as you can a wire fence. We place a barbed wire on the top. Mr. Htnman. Do you have much trouble with dogs? Mr. Winc. We had that trouble. I think it makes a dif- ference what breed you raise as to whether you have trouble in that line or not. I am so far away from home that I probably shall not get into trouble if 1 say this to you: I think that Dorset ewes are not nearly so subject to attacks of dogs as some other breeds, or in any case they stand their ground when dogs come around, and do not run off. Some breeds of sheep run almost on sight of a dog, and dogs from instinct take after them. Mr. Hoyt. Do you have any Angora goats? It is said around here that they will not run for dogs. Mr. Winc. We introduced Angora goats for that very purpose. Of course, I think a real sheep-killing dog will kill a Dorset sheep, but under ordinary circumstances if the dogs have not been in the habit of killing sheep they will not worry Dorset sheep, and I do not think they will Angora goats. The Angora goat, I do not think, however, is quite so brave. Mr. Hinman. Do you confine yourself to Dorsets entirely ? Mr. Winc. In breeding ewes I confine myself to them entirely. I want to say that there are objections to the pure bred for the business I have. A sheep that is descended from a merino ewe and a Dorset ram makes the best sheep in the world for this lamb business. They are a lamb that fattens quicker than the better breeds, they are more sure to lamb early, and that is a point of great advantage. A Member. What do you think of the Shropshire? 1905. | DISCUSSION. : 83 Mr. Winc. The Shropshire is a grand good sheep, but they do not lamb quite so early as the other breed. Mr. Hinman. Are they not a larger sheep? Mr. Hoyr. Will they not weigh more when you send them to market? Mr. Winc. Well, I do not know. Of course, they all vary some, but taking a lot on the average I think the others are better. Mr. Hoyt. Do you think that they are better than the Southdown? Mr. Winc. Well, between the Shropshire and the South- down I do. Of course, we know that the most perfect mut- ton form in the world is the Shropshire. Mr. RicuMonp. Can you get any more for it in the market here? Mr. Winc. It sells for about the same price as the South- down. The Dorset sells also for about the same price per pound. All classes are on about the same level in the market, except as to the wool. Let me tell you just a thing or two here. Of course, I do not know whether there are any sheep breeders here or not. If there are I do not know it. But if you are going into the sheep business do not buy extraordinarily high-priced sheep. Get good sheep, of good average kinds. I have not the time now to tell you all the reasons why, but let me tell you this: They are more subject to parasites than most sheep I know of, and also for the reason that they are slower to mature. You cannot do so well with them where you keep them year after year. Secretary Brown. Do you not change your stock? ’ Mr. Wine. We do. We get new rams occasionally. The suggestion that brother Harris made is a splendid one, that when you get a new ram, to get just as good a one as you can. If he is not a good one you are not apt to get good, strong breed of stock, so that it is quite important to get a strong, vigorous ram. 84 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., We have a great deal of trouble in Ohio, and in fact I think more than you do here, because we have a worse climate than you for resisting parasitic infection. Many of the diseases of the sheep come from the stomach worm. When the lambs in the summer time begin to scour, and the wool gets loose and the eyes look weak and blurred, and they go around in a half life- less condition many times, the trouble is nothing but stomach worm. They die and you bury them. Over in England they have more trouble than we do. I have been over there and I have noticed some of their methods. I noticed that they changed the sheep from one field to another frequently. I asked one shepherd about that, and he said, “ Why, sir, we do not dare to let our lambs sleep two nights on the same ground.” One time I saw a flock and they had a fence around some oak trees in the pasture, so that the sheep could not get under it. I asked the shepherd, “‘ Why don’t you let the sheep get under those trees?” and I found out the reason. I didn’t blame the shepherd, but it was not that at all. There was apparently no objection to letting them lie underneath that tree where there was thick green grass, but the fact was that there they got a little throat worm, which works on the sheep, and they had learned by experience that they must not let the sheep lie under- neath that tree. We change our flock from one field to another and not let them run all summer in one place. By doing that we have had apparently no trouble with parasites. Mr. Brown. How often do you change these flocks from one lot to another? Mr. Wina. I should say they ought to be changed as often as once in ten days. I would like to tell you a little about our fodder. Of course, we have to grow fodder for the sheep in the winter. One of our strongholds is alfalfa. That grows high up, and it has this advantage in connection with this matter, that we have just been talking about, that they do not get the germ of the stomach 1905. | QUESTIONS. 85 worm among it so much. That only breeds down close to the ground. We have never had any parasitic sheep come from alfalfa fed. Red clover will do the same thing. To my mind that is a strong recommendation for both of those feeds. Mr. Witson. Do you have any idea that you can raise alfalfa in Connecticut? : Mr. Winec. I think you can. If you take pains to pro- cure alfalfa that has these little nodules on the roots, so that the ground can become thoroughly inoculated, you will not have any trouble about raising alfalfa. Mr. Hoyr. Did you ever raise any alfalfa for your sheep? Mr. Wine. I cut about 350 tons of alfalfa hay for the sheep this year. Mr. Hoyr. Do you think it is better than the common clover? Mr. Winc. Oh, yes. I think it does better with us. Mr. Hoyt. Do you mean it grows better with you? Mr. WinG. Yes. Mr. Hoyt. Do you think it does better there than here in Connecticut ? Mr. Winc. Well, I don’t know about Connecticut. I think red clover is as easily grown as alfalfa. Alfalfa, how- ever, produces a larger crop, and more of it. When once it is introduced you are sure to get a good crop from it without much reference to drought. When once the soil is thoroughly inoculated you would have no difficulty in getting three crops year after year. Mr. Hoyr. Is there anything in this idea of buying the soil that is inoculated where that grows? Mr. Winc. Yes, there is. There is a good deal in that. Mr. Hoyt. Then, in your opinion, it is necessary to have the inoculated soil before you can do anything with it? Mr. WINc. It is necessary, as I understand it, before you can obtain the best results, to have your soil thoroughly inocu- lated. 86 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., Mr. Hinman. How many years do you grow your alfalfa before you plough again? Mr. Winc. Well, we plough it about every four or five years. Mr. Hoyt. How do you manage to plough it? I should not think you could plough it, as the root is so strong and runs down so deep. I should not think you could plough it without cutting it. Mr. Winc. We do not find any difficulty in ploughing the alfalfa. It is not often that our men say it is difficult to plough it. The way we do is this: If you take an old plow and an old worn-out harness, a poor team, and a hired man without any conscience, I will admit it would be a pretty hard matter to plough it, but if you take a new plough, or one just as good as new, with a good, stiff harness, and a good team, and a man with a conscience, and a file to follow the plough, so as to sharpen it up every little while, you can plough it just as well as you can anything. If the roots are tough and big it is sometimes necessary to sharpen the share every twenty minutes. Mr. Hoyr. The hired men in Connecticut, I am afraid, wouldn’t stand that. They would leave us in no time. Mr. Winc. You might have to do more of that here than we do. Our soil does not have so much stone in it as yours. Here your ploughshare would not stay sharp very long. It is not necessary to do that with us so much. Furthermore, our fields are mostly 160 rods long, and we go down the field and then come back to the upper end before the plough comes out of the ground, and the man files the share, or sharpens it up, before we start out again. Mr. Hoyt. Have you had any experience in raising soy beans? Mr. Winc. Yes. They do well in the south of Ohio, but I do not think they will do well so far north as this. In some years they may be useful to you, but the further north you get, of course, the less liability there is of getting a good crop. 1905. | NOTES ON “A TRIP AROUND THE WORLD.” 87 There is one little point that I intended to speak of. That is, in speaking about running sheep together, it will not do to run weak sheep with strong sheep. If you have any weak sheep in your flock you should cut them out. That escaped my notice, and I failed to say anything about that before. That applies particularly if you are running large flocks. It is better to put the weak ones by themselves. The Presipent. Mr. Wing has been on the floor for some time, and if there are no further questions we will take a recess until 7.30 P. M. (Convention adjourned to 7.30 P. M.) EVENING SESSION. WeEpDNEspDAY, December 14, 1904. Convention called to order at 7.30 Pp. M., Vice-President Seeley in the Chair. The Presipent. If you will come to order now we will have some music. There is nothing that a farmer likes to hear any better than good music, and I am pleased that we have some young people here who can entertain us in right good style. Music. The Prestipent. The subject of the address this evening is ‘Some Observations in the Orient,” illustrated with the the stereopticon, by Congressman E. J. Hill of Norwalk. He certainly needs no introduction to this audience. I take pleas- ure in calling upon him. NOLES ON. DRIP AROUND: FEAR WORLD.” (From an Informal Talk) By Hon. E. J. Hitt of Norwalk. Illustrated by Stereoscopic Views. On Saturday March 23, 1901, I started with a friend upon a trip around the world. We left Jersey City for Chicago on 88 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jane a bright, pleasant day, and next morning found ourselves speed- ing across Central Ohio and through the gas belt of Indiana, and so on to Chicago. The next morning found us in Omaha, where we were temporarily delayed by a severe snow storm, but the delay was short, and the morning of the third day found us crossing the splendid grazing country of western Nebraska. The morning of the 27th of March witnessed our arrival in Salt Lake City, where we made a short stop. We visited Fort Douglass, which is situated on a plateau at the base of the Uintah Mountains at the outlet of the gulch through which Brigham Young and his people marched into the modern Zion. The view from the fort is beautiful, the mountain-rimmed val- ley showing up in all its glory. It is little wonder that Young concluded that he had found the promised land. On the day that we were there the whole circle of mountains was glistening white in the clear sunlight, and with the lake in the distance, the farms to the south, and the city in the foreground, it made a fine picture. The mountain streams have been tapped and the alkali plains turned into a garden. We visited the Mormon Tabernacle, Zion’s Cooperative Mercantile Institution, the Lion House and the Beehive, where we had an audience with Presi- dent Snow. After a very agreeable day we started west the next morn- ing, and with a varied and uneventful trip arrived in San Fran- cisco on April Ist. The next day we boarded the Steamer Buford and started on our ocean voyage to the Orient. We reached Honolulu, in the Sandwich Islands, on April oth, and as we were Sailing along over a smooth sea we could see Molo- kai. It looks like an extinct volcano in the distance. In the center of the island there is a broad yellow band, which indi- cated where the sand hills lie. After we arrived at Honolulu, and after inspection by a quarantine officer we were told that cabin passengers were free to go and come at will. We landed, and meeting friends were taken to the heights back of the city, called the “ Punch Bowl,” where a magnificent view of the city and harbor and ocean is given. Honolulu lies upon a flat at the foot of the mountains. The streets are wide and straight, and the general impression which one receives of it is very favor- able. The growth and progress of the city since the islands were annexed to the United States have been great. The won- derful profusion of flowers in all the yards makes the residence sections look very attractive. No 1 PARLIAMENT BUILDING, HONOLULU No 2 HONOLULU HARBOR 1905. | NOTES ON “A TRIP AROUND THE WORLD.” 89 Many new buildings are being erected, including hotels and fine residences, and the outlook for the prosperity of the islands is good. We paid a visit to Governor Dole, also visited the House and Senate, and were much amused at the procedure in two languages. (Photograph No. 1.) Both houses have many members who speak only Hawaiian, and everything must be done twice through an interpreter in order that each side may know what the speakers upon the other side are saying. The session of sixty days is thus prac- tically changed into one of thirty days. At the time we were there, only eighteen days remained, and but four bills had been passed. The city is wealthy, and is clearly a delightful place in which to live. The harbor is small, but the crowd of shipping from all parts of the world was highly indicative of the pros- perity of the place. (Photograph No. 2.) We made a visit to a new hotel, called The Moana House, at Waikiki Beach. It is a fine structure and worthy of any watering place. The beach is superb, and altogether it is a delightful place to enjoy a vacation. The next day we drove to the Pali. The word means precipice, but this is The Pali or the greatest of all. The government has built a splendid road up the cafion. The valley gradually narrows, being shut in by the precipitous sides of the mountains until at a point about five miles from the city, and about two thousand feet above it, we came to a sheer drop of 1,200 feet, and before us was spread out the whole windward side of the island and a vast expanse of ocean. The opening between the mountains is not more than two or three hundred feet, and on the quietest day the wind sweeps through this funnel at a terrific rate. The view is superb. The next day we took cars and visited a large sugar planta- tion on the north side of the island, 55 miles away. The ride around Pearl Harbor and along the ocean beach was very interesting. We found cane cutting going on and the sugar mill in full operation. The daily produce from that one plantation is about 100 tons of sugar. The plantation consists of about 25,000 acres, 11,000 of which are tillable, the balance rere) BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., mountainous and used to control the water supply for irrigation purposes. About 5,000 acres are now under cultivation, and more being prepared. The plantation reaches for 15 miles along the coast, and constitutes a little community by itself, with a population of about 2,000 persons, having their own stores, shops, scientists, chemists, surveyors, and engineers. Leaving Honolulu on April 12th, after an uneventful voy- age, we arrived off Guam on April 2oth. A launch from the naval collier “ Justine’ came and took us ashore. We found that Governor Schroeder had gone to Agana, but Mrs. Schroe- der and her children and governess were camping on the beach in a board house and tents. (Photograph No. 3.) She sent us in a carriage to the Presidio, where we visited the Filipino prisoners. We saw and talked with Mabini, Pio del Pilar, Ricarti, and others. We found them well taken care of, and they said they had no complaint to make of their food, accommodations, or treatment. We told Mabini that Aguinaldo was captured. He-said, “I am glad. Now we shall have peace.” As the news was whispered around it seemed to me that the faces of the prisoners indicated satisfaction rather than regret. Here, for the first time on our trip, we saw water buffalo, carts with solid wooden wheels, houses with thatch of palm leaves, and nipa, and all the peculiar characteristics of the tropical life among the natives. (Photographs Nos. 4 and 5.) The island is about 29 miles long, and from 6 to 10 wide. The population is about 9,000. It can be made useful to us as a coaling station and cable relay, but aside from that is of comparatively little value. On Wednesday, May Ist, we found ourselves in Bernadino Straits, with the island of Luzon due north, and the splendid ash cone of the Mayon volcano smoking away in plain sight. Flying fish and porpoises abounded upon all sides, and the sail through the inland waters was very interesting and attractive after the monotony of our sea voyage. Early next morning, upon going out upon the deck of the Buford, I saw the flash lights of Corregidor right abreast of us as our ship was entering Manila Bay. All large ships in Manila harbor anchor about two miles from shore, and are loaded and discharged from cascoes or large canal boats. fd : hat ; Sg areas No 4 A HOUSE IN GUAM No 5 THE GUAM EXPRESS ay AMAL No 6 PASIG RIVER, MANILA No 7 STREET SCENE, MANILA / No 8 STREET SCENE, MANILA ‘ 1905. | NOTES ON “A TRIP AROUND THE WORLD eS QI (Photograph No. 6.) . These boats are poled by the natives, who live with their whole families in a little cubby-hole on the stern. The boats are covered with bamboo matting along the sides and half way down to the water a bamboo platform is built, about 18 inches wide, on which the men walk from bow to stern and push the boat with poles. There were hundreds of these boats to be seen, and thousands of people were living upon them. The government hires them at $3.00, Mexican, per day, for the boat with the crew, men, women, and children thrown in. Passing up by the Lunetta and the walled city, we entered the Passig River. It would be difficult to find a busier place. The commerce of the place is enormous. I counted two ocean steamers at the wharves in one little contracted spot, and hun- dreds of tugs, barges, cascoes, and small boats. Manila lies at the southern end of an enormous bay, and a few miles east of it is the Laguna, a large fresh-water lake, connected with it by the Passig River. The land for miles around is almost perfectly flat, having a great depth of soil, very rich, densely populated, and producing enormously of rice and sugar. Manila is a city of about 250,000 people. In fact it is really two cities, one city within and the other city without the walls. The Spaniards long ago built regular walls, moats, draw- bridges, and forts, and must have spent millions in this work. Within the walls are the government buildings and official resi- dences, and some business as well as residence buildings, but the high walls towering up for about 25 feet shut off the sea breezes, and make it a very hot place. Outside is an area of open ground, used for gun ranges, and then comes the modern city, stretching along the bay and up both sides of the Passig River, and around to the bay shore to the south and west of the walled city. This latter section is called the Lunetta, and here the bands play at night and all Manila turns out for a drive and relief in the sea breezes from the scalding heat of the day. (Photograph No. 7.) We put up at the Hotel Orienta. It was said to be the best, but if so I do not know what the others can be. The beds, like all here, are made of splendidly carved native mahogany, with woven bamboo, like the cane seat of a chair, in place of a mat- tress. On this is a piece of grass cloth, and a sheet over all. They are as hard as a board, and it would seem as though the 92 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., people must develop ossified hips from their use. Possibly there is some connection between these bamboo hard beds and the prevailing custom of carrying the babies here astride of either hip, instead of in the arms or on the back as most mothers do elsewhere. Mosquito nets are necessary. The insect is small, does not sing, but is present everywhere, and a vora- cious biter. The streets are fairly wide and clean. There are about 55,000 Chinamen there, and they constitute the workers, servants, and shop keepers of the city. They are industrious, active, and shrewd, and constitute a very important element of the population. It is amazing to see the great loads which some of them carry hung from bamboo sticks, balanced across the shoulders. (Photograph No. 8.) One street, for several blocks, is lined on each side with lit- tle shops about the width of an ordinary window. Chinese women sell drygoods. The goods are piled up on each side of them, and they sit in .the middle for business. At midday a canvas is suspended from awnings at the curb to shut off the heat of the sun, and the whole thing looks like a toy shop. Of course, everybody there rides when they can, as it is too hot to walk. The cab and street service of the city is miser- able. (Photograph No. 9.) Most of the buildings are of stucco or hard wood, with the floors in mahogany or tile. Ants eat up everything else, and the cockroaches take what they leave. Outside of the city, in the outskirts, and in the poorer quar- ters, the houses are nothing but huts, made of bamboo, and thatched with nipa. They are built from six to ten feet above the ground, and have good ventilation if lacking in other things. Everything is subordinated to coolness, and life is hardly worth living then. IP No 28 RICE FIELDS, JAPAN No 2g IRIS: GARDEN, TOKIO No 32 OSAXA DISTRICT, TOKIO Theatre in temple grounds 1905. | NOTES ON “A TRIP AROUND THE WORLD.” 99 ples, and after having our passports viséd by the Russian Minister and obtaining letters from him to the governors of various Russian provinces, started on our journey to Siberia. We left Kobe on the Japanese steamer “Rosetta Maru” for a trip down the inland sea to Nagasaki. The sea seemed to be as densely populated as the land. Lobster boats, junks, schoon- ers, and fishing craft were on every side. After having spent about three weeks in Japan, traveling by rail most of the time, I had found my anticipations of seeing much beautiful scenery wholly unrealized, but it all came back to me on that delight- ful trip through the inland sea. Alaska and Norway cannot compare with this part of the trip, for in addition to the count- less islands, of all shapes and sizes, the channels are filled with steamers, schooners, junks, fishing boats, and the terraces and slopes on the mountains, and the numerous villages and cities, give an odd feature here, which neither of the other countries have. A blue sky and a bright sun made the trip a charming one, and I went to bed that night feeling that another gem from the world’s scenic treasures had been added to my collection. We left Kobe that night, and after a rough trip found our steamer, the “ Borea,’ in Nagasaki harbor. The steamer, however, was not very satisfactory, and we concluded to wait a week for a larger and better boat. While waiting we paid a visit to the United States man of war “ Kentucky,” and lunched with the admiral. The following Sunday we went to the English church, which, after a long hot climb, we found on the hill back of the American Legation. The missionary question in Japan is a much discussed and never settled one. The American Consul’s servants were nominally Christians, They dedicated their boy to Shintoism. His interpreter when educated declared himself to be a Buddhist. The English Consul’s interpreter was a Methodist, Dutch Reform, and Catholic all at once. After waiting several days we left Japan for new experi- ences in Korea and Russia. Our first destination was the harbor of Fusan. All of the Korean town which was visible consisted apparently of mud huts, like the Chinese houses of Taku. Owing to the lack of transportation facilities we were not able to see much of the city. We left Fusan in the most cosmopolitan company with which I ever sailed. It consisted of Japanese, Chinese, Koreans, Danes, English, Americans, 100 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., Turks, Scotch, French, Russians, and some whose nationality was unknown. We sailed up the Japan Sea in plain sight of the coast of Korea. Many whales were spouting around the ship. After a delightful day’s sail we reached Gensan, but too late to go ashore. Gensan has a fine harbor, well pro- tected, and with good anchorage. (Photograph No. 32%.) The Japanese were in possession, and have evidently gone there to stay. The next morning we took a sampan and went ashore, walked through the Japanese concession, and crossing a primitive bridge went through the Korean town. (Photograph No. 33.) It consists of one long street, lined on both sides by miser- able little one-story mud huts, without floors, and horribly dirty and ill-smelling. Why a people living amid this filth should clothe themselves in white, I do not understand. The women wear sleeves and neck pieces, leaving their bosoms exposed, and then a white skirt below. (Photograph No. 34.) The men wear long white coats and full pants, and wooden or grass-cloth shoes, with white cloth bound about the ankles, in place of stockings. This, with a little black stiff hat, set on a head frame, makes a queer costume. The men are large and generally good looking, while the women are small and homely. (Photograph No. 35.) The country about Gensan seemed to be well cultivated. From Gensan we went to Vladivostok. The entrance to the harbor of Vladivostok somewhat resembles the Golden Gate at San Francisco. The city is fortified from every hilltop. The harbor is a splendid one, with abundant room and deep water. The city appeared to be perfectly new, brick buildings abounding, and the change from mud huts and one-story thatched roofs which we had been seeing for two months, was very agreeable. Upon landing we found that our impression of the city when viewed from a distance was entirely correct. The buildings are all new, constructed of brick and stone, ranging from three to four stories in height, and are well designed and substantial. The city has good wharves, parks, wide streets, a new railroad station, fine steamship lines, and is evidently well prepared to exercise a large influence in the future of the Orient. No 32% COREAN GROUP ON JAPANESE CONCESSION, GEUSAN No 33 COREAN EXPRESS, GEUSAN, COREA 2. ye ; No 35 COREANS ON SHIP 1905. | NOTES ON “A TRIP AROUND THE WORLD.” IOI We called upon the governor. In the evening we went to the opera and enjoyed a very creditable entertainment. When we went to bed our sheets and blankets came into play, for all travelers carry their own bedding in Siberia. . Candles, water, and everything were charged extra, and our bill for one day came to $4.25 each. At noon, July 4th, we started on our journey across the continent. Very soon after leaving the borders of Amur Bay the railroad enters the valley of a river, and judging by the soil, grass, flowers, and general appearance, we seemed to be trans- ported into a rich river valley of our own west. We occasion- ally passed thriving villages, and prosperous looking farms were noticed frequently. As we journeyed north the country improved, disclosing magnificent stretches of well-watered prai- ries, wheat farms, large herds of cattle, and fine grass. The towns, as a rule, are located some considerable distances from the stations. - The depots are well-built pretty wooden cottages, and in each town on the highest point the domes of the Russian churches were seen. As we continued to journey north the country changed. Much heavy timber was to be seen. A train of cars loaded with 3 by 10 white pine timber indicated pine trees somewhere, and a profusion of gnats, mosquitoes, and flies told of near-by forests. When we reached Khabarosk, on the Amur River, we wondered whether we could get a boat. We found, however, that the governor at Vladivostok had telegraphed the chief of police to arrange for us. We were taken to the best hotel and informed that a cabin for two had been reserved on the mail steamer sailing the next day. We called on General Grodekoff, and he offered to tele- graph ahead for the boat at Blagovestchenk. The city of Khabarosk has wide straight streets, spread over the high bluffs, and the principal part of it looks down on the River Amur, which at that point is about a mile and a half wide. We sailed on the mail steamer the next day, and during the following night one of the iron barges, which were being towed astern, swerved and ran into the bank. The second one ran into it and rammed it so hard that its back was evidently broken. We were obliged to tie up to the bank while the barge was being unloaded. We were able, however, to make 102 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., better speed without it. The Amur is a wonderful river. More than a mile wide, it is like a great lake. It flows through prairie country, a splendid tillable land, which some day will raise a large part of the world’s wheat supply. The Amur River is the boundary between Russia in Asia and China. China on the south and Russia on the north. It is a splendid country. Mountains are occasionally seen in the distance, but for the most part it is prairie, and the river banks show at least ten feet of soil. (Photograph No. 36.) At a small village we passed we found a crowd of women at the gangplank selling strawberries. (Photograph No. 37.) I bought two quarts for 40 kopecks, or 20 cents of our money. We had to take on wood frequently, and as it was all carried on board by hand from woodpiles high up on the river bank, our progress was very slow. (Photograph No. 38.) As we passed through the Kingan Mountain section the scenery on the river became very fine. At one of our stopping places we took on board a correspondent of a Paris journal, who was racing around the world with a representative of another Paris journal, one going east and the other west. During the trip to Blagovestchenk we frequently ran aground and were delayed by having to tie up at the bank and take on wood. Upon our arrival at the city we found it to be constructed of good buildings, and to possess wide streets and good stores. After leaving Blagovestchenk we had the same sort of experiences as before, our boat frequently running aground, but we had the consolation of finding other vessels and steamers on the river in the same predicament. Traveling on the Amur in low water is not pleasant. The insects infest- ing that country were very annoying. We were especially tormented by enormous horse flies, fully an inch long. One of the most interesting things in natural scenery that we found upon the trip was the so-called White Mountains, or Tsaigon Mountains I think they are called. They are uneven hills of sand rock, several hundred feet high, which bordered the river, and which are continually breaking off and wearing away. The strata and layers visible seemed to be on fire. The smoke is visible in points in the day, and it is said the fire is seen in No 36 WAITING FOR WATER TO RISE ON THE AMUR No 38 WOOD YARD, AMUR RIVER ee a me ve > et No 39 POVROSK, AMUR, AND SHILKU RIVER JUNCTION ‘ip a =) ; _ j eo: . "4 , . Fi i + ‘ ! i ; ‘ a = ° ‘ 7 . ‘at ri ‘ a - ' = ry *: 7 = Fo > s " * of - . spt 7 be - ‘ 7 - ~ i) : < i * . 7 . x E 5a nt en ‘ . La = — » No 40 A BUSINESS CORNER IN STRETENSK No 4x MUSEUM, IRKUTSK 1905. | NOTES ON “A TRIP AROUND THE WORLD.” 103 the night. I think it is a discoloration from hot springs, which exude vapor, and that instead of coal it is a brown earth like the mud springs of the Yellowstone. At Povrosk, which is at the junction of the Chilka and Aigoun Rivers, we took the Chilka. (Photograph No. 39.) The character of the country through which we had passed can be somewhat judged by the fact that we had sailed for nearly 1,200 miles on the Amur River without having seen a single waterfall on either bank. The Chilka proved to be more picturesque than the Amur, the mountains being higher and the banks bolder. The river runs in a single course be- tween high banks, and the views are far reaching, and the ' mountains, though not high, are beautiful. We finally arrived at Stretensk, where we were to resume our railroad journey westward. (Photograph No. 40.) The route is through the Valley of the Chilka and the Ingoda Rivers. The views are very pretty, and the country superb. Fine farms, excellent cattle, and good grazing. We had been told all day of a railroad accident ahead of us, and at half past two in the morning we were compelled to get up and dress and transfer around the débris. The wreck was on a high bank with steep rocks on one side and the river on the other, and with twelve carloads of people attempting to pass each other, all carrying beds and bundles, and all in a hurry, the scene in the moonlight can be imagined only. It was finally done, however, and we went to bed and slept till morning. Much of the country that we passed through appeared to be well adapted for farming purposes. The country was quite populous, villages being frequent, and the farms looked well and prosperous. We passed through one city (Tchita) of 22,000 people, and that same evening we entered the Ablonai Mountains. At that point in Siberia the railroad runs along by a little river, which flows westward to Lake Baikal. The soil is light and sandy, and the prevailing trees are pine. This is the country of the Beuriats, a pastoral people, formerly Mongols, with the Chinese features, queue, and dress, except that they wear round hats with turned-up brims. The coun- try is fine. 104 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., When we reached Lake Baikal, after passing our baggage through the custom house, we went on board the steamer to cross the lake. The ice-breaker, used in winter for keeping the channel open, went out ahead of us with the baggage cars, while the passengers went on a smaller boat. Lake Baikal is a fine body of water, and is said to be about 50 miles wide and 400 miles long. After crossing the lake we continued our journey to Irkutsk. (Photograph No. 41.) That is a city of about 35,000 people, situated on both sides of the Ungara River, and apparently in a flat country. The next day we went shopping and bought cigars, four English novels and some candy for use on the steppes. We visited the cathedral and museum in the morning, and in the evening con- tinued the journey. (Photograph No. 42.) The country after leaving Irkutsk is especially fine. All day long we rode through a splendid prairie country with just enough grade for good drainage. White birch abounded on both sides of the track, and dense pine forests could be seen a little further removed. Here and there was a small farm, and now and then a river. The country appeared like a paradise for farmers and cattle raisers. The forests are clean, no under- brush, but grass and ferns carpeting the ground under the trees. After leaving Irkutsk the country continued fine. Many undulating prairies could be seen, stretching as far as the eye could reach, with plenty of timber scattered about. I was surprised at the extent of cultivation there, and at the fre- quency and size of the towns. (Photograph No. 43.) The soil seemed to be very fertile, and the crops and grass excellent. As we continued our journey westward the country steadily improved in appearance, changing from a prairie country to fine rolling slopes. After leaving Omsk we came into a flat prairie country, where the soil looked rich and the grass thrifty and good. It is magnificent farming land. Every little while we saw herds of horses, cattle, and sheep grazing on the open prairie, and Tartar boys sitting on horseback watching them. In that sec- tion of Siberia the towns are larger than those we had seen a re See No 42 OPERA HOUSE, IRKUTSK No 43 A SIBERIAN VILLAGE po oe i a coe s oo : costes No 44 EUROPEAN RUSSIAN PEASANT VILLAGE No 45 KREMLIN, MOSCOW See Se ee Bey ee ¢ att ee = Sela ae No 46 BIG BELL IN KREMLIN, MOSCOW: No 47 A BREWER’S RESIDENCE, MOSCOW 1905. | NOTES ON “A TRIP AROUND THE WORLD.” 105 before, but less frequent. Still further west we passed into the country of the Khirgese. They are cattle raisers. The country in that section of Siberia is splendid, as fine as I ever saw. Lakes and large ponds abound, and in the absence of rivers they receive the drainage of the country. Continuing our journey westward an occasional pretty view could be seen from the car windows as we climbed up the east- ern slope of the Ural Mountains. We passed the boundary post marking the line between Europe and Asia, in the night, and in the morning ran down into the valleys of the western slope. In that section of the Ural Mountains there is nothing especially attractive about the scenery, but as we journeyed still further west we came into a splendid farming country, with the peasant villages and large estates, splendid farms and wretched huts, indicating wealth for the land owners and misery and poverty for the land workers. (Photograph No. 44.) Upon reaching Moscow we went to see the Kremlin and the churches there, also the “ Napoleon ” church, or Church of our Saviour. The latter is a new one, built to commemorate the French campaign. It is a beautiful building, and is said to be the finest church in Russia, but it is not to be compared with the cathedrals of Milan, Florence, Cologne, or even those in England. (Photographs Nos. 45 and 46.) We visited the Royal Palace (Photograph No. 50), where all of the emperors of Russia go to be crowned. It is a beau- tiful building. Since Peter the Great, St. Petersburg has been the capital, but the coronation ceremonies are held in Moscow. We visited many churches and museums, and among other sights drove out to Sparrow Hill, where Napoleon had his first view of Moscow. ‘The view of the city from there is a very fine one. (Photograph No. 47.) From Moscow we went to St. Petersburg (Photograph No. 48), visited the American Embassy, the Royal Art Gallery, the Monastery of Alexander, where we heard the monks sing- ing the service, also the curious cemetery connected with the monastery. We also drove through Alexander Park and the islands in the Neva, as well as visited the cathedral built by Peter the Great in the Peter and Paul Fortress, together with 106 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [ Jan., the three-room cottage in which he lived. We visited the Gal- lery of Russian Art, went to the lace stores, the monuments of Catherine and Peter the Great, and finally to the palaces. (Photograph No. 49.) From St. Petersburg we passed by rail through Russia over the German frontier to Berlin, visiting many of the points of interest in Berlin. From there we went to Brussels, to London, where we spent a week in visiting the scenes of former experiences, including the National Gallery, St. Paul’s, West- minster, Blackwall Tunnel, Regent’s Park, the Zoological Gar- dens, the theaters, and many other points of interest. On Saturday, August 31st, we boarded the good ship “ Philadelphia,” and as we passed down the Solent the United States cruiser “‘ Dixie’ mustered her whole crew, and as our ship passed the bands played the “ Star Spangled Banner ” and “ Home, Sweet Home,” and with three hearty cheers sent after her the “ Philadelphia ” began her first voyage under her new name. After an uneventful trip we sailed into New York harbor, only to receive the awful news that McKinley had been shot, and the expressions of pleasure on reaching home were at once changed to those of sorrow and sadness. However, we reached home in safety, having circumnavigated the world in five months and fifteen days from the time of departure, visit- ing many strange countries, having been among many queer people, and seen many beautiful sights; but of them all none were so dear or so pleasant as New England and our own home in Norwalk, Conn. Music. Convention adjourned to Thursday, December 15th, at 10.00 A. M. SECOND DAY — MORNING SESSION. December 15, 1904. The Presipent. The meeting will come to order. The first on our programme this morning is music. Music. The Presipent. Iam sure we are all very much interested in housekeeping. I suppose we could not help it very well. fn CHET pli mS ’ 4 No 48 BUSINESS CORNER, ST. PETERSBURG Baa Ht ARN hi: a od No 49 PETER THE GREAT MONUMENT, ST. PETERSBURG Dein Las Fo a ars . iH eo pile 3 ; ah cceepeidiaiaeadiiieate artes cart >* gases cate it , Se i a ibe iz + anes No 50 EMPEROR’S PALACE, ST. PETERSBURG 1905. | THE RESERVE POWER IN HOUSEKEEPING. 107 If you will look on the programme you will see that the first thing this morning is “ The Reserve Power in Housekeeping.” We have a lady here who, I think, will be able to interest us all in this subject. I have the pleasure of introducing Miss Martha Van Rensselaer of Cornell University. RESERVE POWER IN HOUSEKEEFPING. By Miss Marta VAN RENSSELAER, Of Cornell University. Ladies and Gentlemen: I am really glad to see so many gentlemen in the audience, although it is not generally supposed that they are interested in housekeeping — though they cer- tainly are three times a day, and the women certainly are interested in having them take up the subject as a study, because they have an idea that if men built the kitchens, if the men worked in the kitchens, if the men stood at kitchen sinks, if the men stood over the stove, if the men threw out the dish water, and the men traveled up and down the cellar stairs, that the cellar stairs would be easier, that kitchen stoves would be higher, that the kitchen sinks would be suited to the height of the individual, that gas jets would be hung within reach of the people who have to light them, that steps would be taken out from between kitchen and dining-room, that refrigerators would be within easy reach, that ice would be upon the farm, that the water would be brought into the house as well as into the barn, and, in short, that the same economy of labor would be studied in the household that is now studied in other lines of work in which men are engaged. For that reason we do not regret that the men are here this morning to hear a simple talk upon “ Reserve Power in Housekeeping,’ for the men do build the houses, the men do plan the kitchens to some extent, and it is a very fortunate thing when a man says to his wife, “T want to know where to put this kitchen sink.” It is a very fortunate thing that he consults his wife in regard to the plans of the house, because she is the one who does the work, and because she seems to have an intuitive knowledge of how these things ought to be. I was not saying —I would not have you misunderstand me —I was not saying that I thought the men ought to work at the kitchen sink; I was not saying that I 108 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., thought they ought to do the cooking, although I think it would be well done if they did it, and I think perhaps the dishes would be well washed if they washed them. When men do things they generally do them pretty well. When they do learn how to cook beefsteak it is very appetizing, and if men planned the meals I am sure they would study rations for the family as they now study rations for cattle. I think it is a very fortunate thing, when an emergency occurs, that the men know how to do these things, and when it comes to training boys, I think I should have boys trained to do housework the same as girls are trained to do housework. Boys go away from home, boys are thrown upon their own resources; they go into the cities and into colleges, and very often board themselves. They very often have to darn their own stockings, and it is a very unfortunate thing when a boy is not trained in some of the arts of home-making, so that they can be a helpmeet as well as to have the wife a helpmeet. I have not come to you, I assure you, with any new ideas _ in regard to housework. I wish I had some new ideas, because I think we have certain problems in connection with house economy which it would be well to solve. I cannot tell you how to lead the girl to like housework so well that she will want to stay upon the farm instead of going to the city —1 cannot solve that problem entirely. I cannot tell you how to secure domestic service and have it well trained. I cannot tell you how to make girls like to do housework better than anything else, but I can suggest, perhaps, some of the old, old things; I can remind you of some things our mothers did — some things we know so well and yet which we do not practice and for that reason need to be reminded of over and over again. In the first place our houses are not always as convenient as they should be. I shall refer several times, perhaps, to our work in the University Extension in New York State, and for that reason I am going to take the liberty of giving you a little sketch of it in order that you may know something of the source of help and the information that I want to give you. We were having in New York State a reading course for the farmers, and nature studies for the children, and they said: Why not have something for the farmers’ wives? While the men are study- ing rations for cattle why should not the women study rations for men? While they are studying the conditions of the soil, 1905. | THE RESERVE POWER IN HOUSEKEEPING, 109 and the culture of fruit, why not give the women a study which shall make thém better homekeepers? Then they said: You cannot, in a university, tell women how to do housework ; they are doing it every day, over and over again. They can make better doughnuts than you can, they can make better pies than you can. Nevertheless, we sent a letter to the women of the State, assuming that every farmer who was enrolled in the farmers’ reading course had a wife. We sent in that lesson to the farmer a letter to the farmer’s wife and said, “ Would you like a parallel course with that of your husband, in domestic economy?” About two thousand replies came saying, “ Yes, we want to study along those lines,’ and there came at once a large number of letters, because we had asked in that lesson, “Are there any ways by which you can save steps in the home?” We found we had touched upon the vital question ; that women were not asking for less work to do, but to be able to do more work, to conserve their strength in such a way that they might be able to accomplish more-work. They needed not a recipe for making doughnuts, they wanted to be in sympa- thetic touch with other people. The healthy woman upon the farm is not complaining of the drudgery, neither is she com- plaining because she has so much work to do, but the thing that wears upon her, and the reason, perhaps, why so many girls do not want to remain on the farm is on account of the monotony of the life. When you give them something to think about, when you lead them to look beyond the kitchen sink to the sunset, or, if necessary, to the sunrise; when you lead them to look beyond the kitchen work to the time which they. have for reading; when you lead them to become interested again in the music they had forgotten, to the book they had put upon ‘the shelf, you bring them into touch with life and give them something to lift them out of the drudgery — the work doesn’t seem so much like drudgery. We began by asking about steps, steps that they were taking in the home. Several women wrote that they had been read- ing the lesson we had sent them upon saving steps to their hus- bands. In some cases the husbands objected and said, “ Don’t tell me about that; I am so driven I can’t talk about extra steps.’ On one occasion a man said, “ You are making some expense on my farm, but it is a good thing. I had to put ice in the house and bring water into the kitchen.” We found in IIO . BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [ Jan., the ten or twelve lessons or bulletins we have sent out that the lesson upon saving steps was perhaps the most vital and touched them in a way that other lessons have not. In many cases the houses are not convenient. A farmer doesn’t always consult an architect — perhaps fortunately, perhaps unfortunately — when he builds his house. He is very apt to make a house according to the custom which prevails, whereas an architect, or a person who is spending a good deal of time along that line, will study how to build a house with the most convenience ; he will study how to build a house in order to bring the furniture into the right place, and the doors into the right place. It is a very good problem for a woman to consider whether she is taking five steps to get to her cupboard when she might just as well move the cupboard and take only three. She begins to consider how many miles of travel she is taking in the course of a year. We asked them to make a mathematical calculation to determine how many miles of travel a woman would take in getting their meals —in determining how long it would take them to go around the world, traveling the dis- tance required to get around the world in doing their house- work. You will see that it was a good thing; it induced them to study wherein they might change conditions and bring their household furniture into lines so that they would not travel very far. One woman writes this: she said, “Ever since I have lived in this house I have made my bread in the kitchen ; I have traveled across the dining room, across the pantry, to get to my flour bin.” She said: ‘* My mother did it before me, and I have done it, and it never occurred to me, until we studied the lesson upon saving steps, to change the flour room, or bring the flour barrel into-some place within easy reach of the kitchen.”” A man wrote that he had found it very convenient to have water in the barn but it hadn’t occurred to him before that he might bring it into the kitchen, and save his wife’s time and strength by bringing that water where she could merely turn a faucet and have plenty of water for her kitchen work without having her travel across the veranda, down the steps, part way across the door yard, to the pump. They have also studied ways by which they can use their muscles to better advantage. It isn’t possible to change the height of the kitchen sink for every passing maid, but a man can at least change the height of it for his wife, for he doesn’t 1905. | THE RESERVE POWER IN HOUSEKEEPING. III change often enough so that there will be very great incon- venience in that respect. I have seen women working at kitchen sinks so low that they had to bend the back. No won- der that the spirit droops and she has very little courage, for three hours spent at a low kitchen sink is backaching work. Why is it that the hooks are put into the closet or about the room just a little higher than it is easy for a person to reach? Why is it that the gas jet is very often just beyond a woman’s reach? : There are simple changes which may be made about a house which will make it possible for a woman to keep her courage, keep her strength, and make her feel that housework is not real drudgery. Another bulletin which we sent out is on the subject of sav- ing strength. We have physical culture for women in the household. A woman very often says that she has no time to study physical culture, that that belongs to the women who are not busy, and to the women who haven’t very much exercise ; but the woman who has to do her household work from day to day is not using certain muscles that she ought to use. She is bringing the strain of her work tfpon the wrong muscles. I don’t know that very many women will care to go to school, but there are a few vital principles which she may study which will keep her in good health. She is not asking for less work to do, she is asking how to do the work she has better, so that she may be able to accomplish more without loss of strength and health. In the first place she does not stand always upon the balls of her feet in doing her work. If, as she stands at her table, she will study to see whether the weight is upon the heels or balls of the feet, it will be a wise conservation of strength. She can determine that by rising upon the balls of her feet occasionally. As she stands at her table doing her work, if she stands back upon her heels, abdomen forward, chest down, she will feel a constant sagging of her hips, a constant depres- sion which comes to every organ of her body, then a depres- sion to her mind which affects her whole being. Let her rise upon the balls of her feet, abdomen back, chest up. Let her say, “ Life is worth living.” She sees the bright side of life, courage comes, strength comes. An athlete works hard to keep his muscles strong. A woman should practice the same principles as an athlete, use her muscles, and she will become 112 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., stronger if she uses them in the right way, as does the athlete or the student of physical training, keeping her weight upon the balls of her feet, keeping her chest high and head high. If she is obliged to bend at her work, let her not get over it in this position (illustrating), which she has gotten in the habit of doing, but bend at the hips; that keeps the chest up. And if she is obliged to work at a table too low for her, or at a stove (and a stove is nearly always too low), or a sink too low, let her bend at the hips and keep her chest up. Working in this way there is no strain whatever upon the abdomen. Let the limbs perform the burden of the work; they contain no vital organs, therefore they cannot be injured. See that the weight is kept over the center of gravity, which will be over the balls of the feet. They become the base. In this way she will accomplish more, and she will find that she is gaining strength rather than losing it. She wants to reach, she finds she is obliged to. The shelves are high. Some women reach in this way, bringing the body away from the reach instead of with it. It is possible to keep the weight upon the balls of the feet, let the body go with it; that motion does not injure the person, does not bring a strain where this does. This brings a strain upon the back, upon the organs of the body which are not well suited for the strain, but bring the arm this way, let the body sway toward the place where one has to reach, and there are no bad effects. We often watch men at work and cannot help but notice that they use their bodies to rather better advantage than do women. If a man is sawing wood — we don’t see them sawing wood so very often nowadays, I don’t know but it has become a lost art — | have been looking for a man sawing wood for a long time to see how he did it, but I suspect he uses his arms. If a woman washes clothes she uses her back. She gets over her tub, her chest gets a little depressed, and she uses her back upon her work, bringing the strain upon the back, and says work is drudgery. It is hard work, indeed it is, but it is pos- sible with the weight forward upon the balls of the feet —I don’t mean she shall rise upon her toes in doing it, but keep the weight there, keep the chest up, use the arms as a man does when he saws wood, as a man does very often when he rows a boat. The great difficulty in a woman’s work is that she uses lier back while a man uses his limbs. Is it not a fact that a 1905. | THE RESERVE POWER IN HOUSEKEEPING. I1l3 man is very apt to do things in the easiest way and a woman in the hardest way? When a man lifts he uses his limbs for it. When he lifts a bag of meal he uses his arms. If a woman has to lift a chair or to lift any burden, she is very apt to use her back. No wonder it is hard work. It isn’t difficult if one has strong arms — and the more we use them the stronger they become — to lift a chair with the arms. Let a woman try to lift a bag of meal, she doesn’t manage it perhaps very gracefully, but she can certainly gain strength and come to the point of lift- ing heavy loads if she will study how to lift. She ought never to try to lift with the weight upon the back of the heels. That is a very vital point, she should keep the weight forward and lift with the arms. I suppose that one of the things which women will always have to do is to pick up after the men and after the children, There are various ways of doing that. I suspect that the ordi- nary way, the one which we usually practice, is this (illustrates). No wonder we women when we do it think it is pretty hard to always keep picking up after folks. When I picked up that handkerchief I bent my back, brought the strain upon the back, but it is possible to keep the back from doing any work. (Illus- trates again.) All the strain in that case is brought about the knees, and it wasn’t a difficult thing to do; I didn’t think to groan when I did it that time, for it was so easy. I think when a woman picks up that way she should be thankful that she has aman to pick up for. A great degree of courage goes with our work when the work doesn’t seem very hard. Washing clothes isn’t a very easy thing to do, scrubbing isn’t easy, but houses have to be scrubbed and clothes have to be washed, and a great many women nowadays are doing it in order to get it done and done the way they want it done. It isn’t easy to get hired help; that is, it isn’t always a possible thing to get someone who will come and do the work as you want it done. A great many women do their own housework, not because they cannot get help at all, but because they can’t get it done the way they want it done. We have to study sim- plicity, study how to do things in the easiest possible way ; then we can learn to scrub and sweep in a way that will give a great deal of personal comfort to the woman who is doing her own work, I don’t see a broom around here; it may not be necessary Acr.—8 114 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan:, to have a broom here, but I will use my arms so that you may see what I am doing. I can sweep in a way to bring a great deal of strain upon the back, and the woman who does that gets exceedingly tired. When aman sweeps he sweeps toward him, doesn’t he? Or I may be able to sweep so as to use my arms in doing it — I don’t suppose you would know what I am doing now. ‘There is no strain upon the back. It is possible to sweep for quite a long time, using the arms, and it is possible to get over and use our backs and become weary in a very short time; so in mopping, so in scrubbing. I suppose the very easiest way to scrub is to get down on our hands and knees. A foreign woman prefers to scrub by getting down on her hands and knees, and I can see the advantage of it to a great extent. She lets the weight of her body do part of the work. In getting over upon her hands and knees to scrub the weight of her body comes on the brush to some extent. If she takes the mop, she uses her back in such a way as to weary her in a very short time. You say it looks like hard work to clean a kitchen floor by getting down on one’s hands and knees. After all a great many do it in preference to using.a mop, simply because it is a conservation of strength to do it in that way, and she finds she doesn’t get so weary and perhaps she has better results. There are various things along that line that I might speak of in ordinary housework, but I think I have mentioned the general principles. Then there is the habit which we have of resting when we have hard work to do. Did you ever see a woman when she thinks there is no one around drop into an easy chair, pick up a paper and begin to read, but she hears some one coming and she gets up quickly and goes to work again. She feels as so many have felt— but I think they are giving up the notion — that it is something to be ashamed of if she stops in the middle of the day to rest. One of the very best times to rest is just before din- ner, when things are rushing; you expect the men in the house very soon and they want things about right when they come, and they ought to have them about right, we don’t deny that ; but that woman is very apt to get the screws screwed a little tighter, to get a little more tension in her body, to work a little harder, and the lines in her face become a little deeper and she gets a little more anxious. She is afraid dinner won’t be ready on time, that something is going wrong, and she thinks house- 1905. | THE RESERVE POWER IN HOUSEKEEPING. 115 work is very anxious work. That woman at dinner time must have her warm meal ready to serve. She must be ready to receive the complaints of the children, if they have any, when they come home from school; she must be the sweet spirit of the household. She must preside at the dinner table and be just as serene as though the cake hadn’t burned, as though everything had gone well about the dinner. She must be the one to be sweet and amiable, no matter how things have gone, and to be the one who is the lever of the whole household. Really, she has had cares enough since early morning to break down one individual unless she learns to look at life in a philo- sophical way, as she very often does. Now, if she has added tension to her body as the work increased, become more and more anxious, when dinner-time comes and that strain comes upon her from the necessity of being the one who is always bright and cheerful, if she is able to go beyond the dinner hour to her resting hour, if she has one, she gets along very well, but sometimes there is a last straw which breaks the camel’s back. She may want to go behind the kitchen door and cry; she can’t do it, though. She may want to give up and say: “I can’t keep this household running; it is too hard work. Here I have spent the whole day trying to keep things in shape and have the cooking good, and I haven’t heard anything but grum- bling since dinner began.” The daughter says, “I don’t want to settle down to this kind of a life.” It isn’t to be wondered at, but I suppose if when she found she was getting tired she would simply drop everything and say, “I have done the best I can, I will do the very best I can, and it will come out all right, I don’t need to worry”; if she would have an easy chair brought down to the kitchen, one of those good old- fashioned easy chairs, and drop into it perhaps at eleven o’clock in the forenoon, drop into it and simply relax, close the eyes, relax the jaws — it is a good thing for even a woman to relax the jaws sometimes — give up, take the tension out of the body, shake it out. She finds her hands clinched, she finds the lines getting very deep in her face, she finds her teeth shut tight together, and she is working harder and getting more anxious, and sometimes I have heard of her getting so anxious that she got cross. But if she will drop everything and say, “I am going to rest for an hour or so,” it is surprising how cares will fly away, how refreshed she will feel, and she will go about her 116 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., work feeling that the dinner hour is much easier than she anticipated, and she meets her family with a cheerful counte- nance. She has a right to that rest. Perhaps she may pick up a book at that time, perhaps that is relaxation to her ; it may be a book of poems, it need not be a recipe book necessarily, it may be something that will refresh her soul. Let her go to the piano any time during the day. You know when a woman leaves school and goes onto a farm she is still just as much inter- ested in books, she is still just as much interested in music as that woman who went into the village or the city and settled in life, who hired her help, went around the corner when she wanted a loaf of bread instead of having to make it, who calls in a milliner when she wants a hat or goes to the dressmaker for her dress, and finds life a great deal easier in these respects. The same two women possibly went to the same school, stood as high in their classes, had the same ambitions in life, had equal ability, and yet, when a woman goes onto a farm there is work for her from morning until night. Shall we say that woman is not as well educated, has not just as high ambitions in life; shall we say that she is not just as intelligent as the other woman who married a lawyer or a doctor or a teacher? What do we expect of the farm woman? We expect that she will be an all-around, well educated woman. What does she do? She is her own cook, she must know all about cooking ; she is her own milliner, possibly her own dressmaker ; she takes care of the animals about the place, or at least part of them; she attends to the flower garden; she is the nurse of the house- hold, and very often nurse for the neighborhood. She is the woman who takes some interest in public affairs in the neigh- borhood; she is a pillar of the church. I might enumerate a good many things that she is. Do you say that the farmer’s wife, then, isn’t an intelligent, all-round woman? She is a woman with a broad education, with a practical education, the woman upon whom we are all depending. She is the woman whose sons and daughters we are relying upon. She is the woman whose sons have gone to college, whose sons are occu- pying important places in this world. She is the mother of the household ; she is the woman who is staying at home and doing that housework, taking up the cares of the household to let the son and the daughter go away to school. In the city or village it is the man a great many times who is furnishing money to 1905. | THE RESERVE POWER IN HOUSEKEEPING. 117 send the son to college. The burden doesn’t come upon the woman in the city as it does upon the woman on the farm. Many a boy or girl who goes to the agricultural college says that it is possible from the efforts of his father or mother, for they are staying at home and attending to the work so that they can be away, and that is the woman who has the care, who is taking the responsibility, making it possible for the farmer’s boys to be the great men of the country; and are they not? It is an oft-discussed proposition and nothing new to you, that it is the boys who have come from the farms who are making their way in the world, becoming our statesmen, becoming our lawmakers, becoming our clergymen and substantial men in the community. Let the time come when we shall go back to the farm and make farming one of the greatest professions in the world. Now, if that woman has that care in company with her husband, she is the woman who needs to learn to relax. There is a large responsibility resting upon her. Is it not a difficult thing when a woman’s health gives out, when a woman has lost her strength, is it not a difficult thing to find any one to come in and take her place? Then she needs to conserve her strength, needs to add to it, for it is a pretty difficult thing for a man to run his farm without his wife. It is almost impossible for her to give up, therefore she needs relaxation more than most anyone else. She needs to rest part of the day. We can relax without going farther than our easy chair, with- out lying down to do it. What do you do when you go to the dentist’s? Do you relax? We Americans have a peculiar habit. Do you know what a German physician said when he came to this country? WHe said, “Americans have a terrible disease. It is written on every face,” and he called it “Ameri- canitis.” You may call it ambition. Perhaps it is ambition, it grows out of ambition; but has it not become to a great extent, as the German physician said, “Americanitis”? It is written in our faces. When you go to the dentist you grasp the arm of the chair, you push your feet against the bottom of the chair, and you shut your teeth together until the dentist pries them open, and you suffer more in the anticipation than you do in the participation. What do you do when you think the train is late, when one is waiting for the train? You get anxious. What do we do when we get on a street car going to make an appointment? Watch the people upon a street car 118 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. Ljau., and you will see anxiety written upon their faces. Watch it in a city where there is rushing and turmoil. Relaxation is a thing we are leaving out of our lives. That man who has written that wonderful book called “ The Simple Life,” is teach- ing relaxation all the time, relaxation of the spirit. Now relaxation of spirit may come to be relaxation of the body, and the woman in the home needs to learn it; needs to simply relax and take away the tension out of her body and learn to do things in an easy comfortable way. When life seems to be full of care she needs to relax and say, “ Things will take care of themselves, we will get along all right.” We need it in the busy time when we screw things up still tighter, so we can stand the work. I would suggest, then, relaxation of the nerves, of the muscles of the body. When a woman feels that she has difficult work before her, I would suggest that she go and rest; have a chair in the kitchen, an easy chair where she may sit down when she is paring the potatoes. After a woman has worked a good many years she learns to do that, and it is to the daughters perhaps that this should be said. After a woman has lost her strength it is very easy for her to learn to do those things, but sometimes it is too late. We need to learn those things while we have our strength. No one need to be ashamed of a chair in the kitchen, no one need to be ashamed to have conditions so nearly right in a kitchen that it is easy to do the work. We have large missions to do upon earth, and we need to have a great deal of ability and competency, and we need to study all the time to be at our best, and we are not at our best when we are tired. We are not at our best when we are working under unfavorable conditions. These are merely comments, merely suggestions, which, while as I said before they are not new, we may still well keep in mind. We get into bad habits, we can get into the good habits just as easily. We can get into the habit of keeping cheerful and pleasant, and letting our worries go, saying, ““ We will do the best we can,” and when we do the best we can we have nothing to worry about. I want to congratulate you upon the fine opportunities which you have in this organization for meeting shoulder to shoulder and having heart to heart talks once a year, of having an organization where the men and women work together. I don’t object to women’s organizations, I don’t object to men’s 1905. | QUESTIONS. 119 organizations, but one thing I like about the farmers’ organiza- tions is that the men and women work together. I do know that the women when they attend these meetings listen with a great deal of interest to the discussions in regard to the raising of cattle and the rearing of sheep, and the planting and tilling of the soil, and I have often wondered if when they went home they did not advise their husbands in regard to it. But at any rate I admire their interest in the subjects; I like the fact that they are working together and that they are partners. In no profession of life that I can name are men and women so nearly partners as they are as farmers. For that reason it is a delight- ful occupation, and for that reason these meetings which we have throughout the country are delightful, and I carry with me a very great admiration for the work which you are doing. Mr. Gop. As no one appears to be ready to ask questions, I rise to ask a question and to say a few words myself confirma- tory of what the lady has told us. I learned a good while ago that a boy could be kept in trim so that work and errands were a pleasure to him, or he could be driven with work so that he would shirk it every time he had a chance, and that was a provision of nature to restore that boy’s activity again. When you sent him in a hurry on an errand, he came back again and tumbled down under a tree. That was an exercise of nature to lie there. You,could call upon him in a few moments again and he would start up as lively a boy as ever. But if you didn’t let him have, once in a while, a chance to rest, if you were all the time nagging him, you wouldn't get much satisfaction out of that boy or girl that you wanted to stimulate to exercise. Now if we have a horse we find we have to get a certain amount of work out of him, and we feed him, and one man, with the same amount of feed and the same amount of work, keeps that horse in good plight, and he holds him in with the rein all the time while the horse is doing his work. The other’ man so manages that horse that he has to have the whip up to strike him to do his work, and he will do no more work, and keep that horse poor all the time on the same feed. 120 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., There is a principle in our animals that we understand and practice as farmers, and now we need to apply it to humanity a little more than we have been in the habit of doing in the past. The lady has given us illustrations with regard to the use of the back or the limbs for doing some kinds of work. Mr. Hoyt here might tell us something about pulling trees. He knows how to have men pull trees without breaking their backs and tiring them very much, and we can pull docks with our knees instead of our backs, and other weeds and bushes. We have learned that, and now we are learning that a woman may spare herself some of her labor by using her limbs instead of her back. I am very much pleased with these illustrations of family matters, and some of them come home personally to the house that I occupy. The kitchen is a good way from the dining hall, but that seems to be the nature of things and difficult to remedy. The flour barrel is conveniently near the kitchen, and we have water in the kitchen as well as at the barn. We are all up in that line, but the matter of disposing of the refuse from the kitchen is one that we haven't solved to a general family satisfaction. It comes up in a variety of forms, and is one worthy of a great deal more study and consideration than it has yet received among our rural population. I am very much pleased with the sort of home character of this address we have had this morning, and I am surprised there are no more ladies here in the audience; there ought to have been, but there are a goodly number here, and I hope that we shall carry these instructions to our rural homes. Mr. Rosertson. I would like to ask what the lady would suggest in this matter. There are mothers who feel that their children should take life easier than they themselves have done, they are relieving the children of burdens and carrying them all themselves. They want to relieve their sons and daughters of work which they had to do, for the reason that they went through things not very pleasant and they want to have their daughters have an easier time. 1905. | QUESTIONS. 121 Miss VAN RENSSELAER. I have rather old-fashioned ideas in regard to that subject. I think that the fathers and mothers are relieving their children too much, that the burden is coming upon the father and the mother when the child ought to be taught to do for his father and his mother. It never hurts a boy to relieve his father. It never hurts a boy to relieve his mother in any kind of work, and that is the greatest blessing which you can confer upon a boy when you teach him, if he needs to be taught, to do things for his father and mother. Give a boy or girl his strength, which we will assume the boy and girl of whom we are speaking has, and I would say that you train him to do those things. They are not going to hurt him, and if you do these things for him and thrust him about upon the world, he is helpless, and the world has got to teach him a great many lessons that the father and mother should teach him. Therefore, I cannot sympathize with that condi- tion. I cannot sympathize at all with the boy or girl growing up in a home not knowing how to build a fire. A boy in my class the other day said, ‘““ My mother never let me build a fire, she thought I couldn’t.” There he was, a boy in the twenties, who owned up before those young women that he didn’t know how to build a fire. Do you suppose anybody would choose him? No. I feel that one of the things in this world that we need nowadays is to teach boys and girls to wait upon their elders; it won’t hurt them. I cannot comprehend how men who have made themselves and become the great men that they are, through self exertion, through self-sacrifice, can shut their sons off from that same privilege. Paying their bills, letting them not work their way through but satisfying every possible want, is a great misfortune to the children. This question has been asked: “ Do you believe cooperation in domestic affairs to be possible in farming communities to help the housewife? ” It hasn't, it seems to me, been tried very much, but it seems to me possible, and this question comes at once: ce Can we have 122 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. | Jan., “= a laundry?”’ We had an article a short time ago in “ Country Life in America,” written by Professor Bailey, in which he advocated a laundry in a farming community. Nearly every farming community has some water power or machinery by which this same power could be applied to laundry work. This woman spends half a day or more in her home washing out the clothes ; that woman over there is doing it, and that woman over there is doing it, all through the community, and she is getting pretty tired of it. The woman in the larger village or city sends her clothes to the laundry. It seems to me it would be possible to have a laundry in connection with a cheese fac- tory, if necessary, although I am not certain that the two things would work well together, but in some way utilize power for doing that washing. I am not saying that it can be done. I am still in doubt about it. I have asked some men who handle laundry machinery if such a thing were possible. They say, “ We have written to a number of manufacturers in the coun- try asking that question in regard to a laundry. They say they cannot make the machinery cheap enough so that farmers will want to buy it. It would hardly be possible to do it less than $300.” laundry machine at a cost of $300 will it pay? I have asked the question instead of answering it. This woman makes cake today, and pies, and that woman does the same thing, and that woman does the same thing. In a larger community these women send to the bakery —and I Now, if twenty families in a community can use one am sorry she has to, for home-made pies are better than any other. There is a duplication in a farming community of all lines of work, so that if you had some woman in a community who would learn how to make the best kind of pies, and let this woman send to her for her pies, and that woman send to her for her pies, and that woman, I don’t see why you are not sav- ing the time of these women to do something else. Here is a woman who keeps chickens, and that woman keeps chickens, and that woman. There is a duplication of time and work and 1905. | QUESTIONS. 123 energy. It seems to me if that woman would make a success of her chickens, and that woman make a success of making honey, and that woman make a success of bakery stuff (if she knows how to make it homelike), and that woman raise celery, perhaps it would be better for each woman. I haven't tried any of these things, but I have been thinking along that line and wondering why farmers cannot have united interests. I hope some of you will disagree with me and take up the other side, for 1 am very anxious to know if these things are at all possi- ble. I would like to see the things tried. To be sure it would be better for the women to eat fewer pies and to get along with less cake, and have a simple table ; perhaps that would be a bet- ter solution of her household problems. The PresipentT. I would like to ask the speaker if she doesn’t think the women are largely responsible for this routine work into which they are so likely to fall? They get a certain round of duties and they follow the thing up day after day and never think that they themselves can make an improvement. Miss VAN RENSSELAER. I think that is true. It takes thoughtfulness. We are doing things at a great disadvantage simply because we have got into the habit of it, but I do want to say that the men can help a great deal in that respect. Women do get very tired in their work and some people need encouragement a good many times; they need to have the man drive around with the carriage as bright as before he married her and say, “ Let’s go for a ride; let’s go to see our neighbor ; let’s go to church today; let’s go and hear a concert.’ Then she will begin to see other people and see how other people are doing. But when the conditions are such that she gets up at five o’clock in the morning and works until nine, and goes to bed and just lies down to sleep exhausted, without any of those things like music or books to rest her, it is very natural to fall into that rut, and that rut, expressed in a common way, is the thing that is wearing her out, not the hard work. Mr. KirkHAm. I got up with about the same motive that 124 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [ Jan., Mr. Gold did, to tell how glad I am to hear this lecture. I wish Mrs. Kirkham had been here to hear it, but I couldn’t prevail upon her to leave. A great many things, it seemed, needed attention and I couldn’t induce her to come. That is the way with a great many of the ladies, I presume. The gentleman who spoke last night confided in me a certain fact which has been illustrated here by the speaker. He has been through a very active campaign, we all know, and is one of our Congressmen from this State. Being well acquainted. with him, I asked him about his health. ‘“ Well,” he says, “I have had a hard time since the campaign closed. I thought I should just sit down and get rested, but there was something the mat- ter with my heel, and I went to see a doctor. He told me what I had done exactly. ‘ You have used that heel more than any other part of your body.’ I used to speak every day and every night, and I had a habit when I was speaking of stepping back on my heel and putting the whole weight on that heel, and now I have been laid up and ought not to be here tonight.” That is the way he spoke. “ But,” he said, “I’m getting better of it now, and I’m going to take a rest.” I am old enough to know better, but I got onto my heel a month ago, and I took off my stocking and saw a black streak clear around from the instep to the other side — the blood had settled there. I knew what caused it, and I let up. Well, I remember when I was a young man hearing a farmer talk one Sunday noon — the time the farmers get together in the horse- sheds. He said the Swedes were their help. He said: “ You never hear of a Swede complaining of chronic disorders ; they know how to handle themselves in hard work. They stand straight up when pitching oats, rye, or hay; they stand right up with the whole strength of the body over the center of gravity.” He had studied the matter himself, but farmers don’t have time to do it as a rule — | don't. Then when the lady was talking about the planning of the house, I suppose every one here thought about the back part 1905. | QUESTIONS. 125 of his own house. It carried me right home, but I am happy to say when I called to see my wife and told her I was going to get a man to plan the house, she said, “ I wish you would let me do it.” I said, “I want to have you.” And so we just put our heads together and planned that house, and the only problem I have never been able to solve is where to put the cellar stairs. We couldn’t find a place in the house to get them in, so we made a crooked pair of stairs to get down cellar, to save room. I have wanted to tear those stairs down for over a year, but my wife says, “ Would you change those after twenty years of occupancy? Not a thing in it have I wanted to change in all those year's.” Just as soon as I could get a man to do it I brought water into the house, and it has been a wonderful blessing. I don’t know how any one ever lives with- out it. My neighbors don’t have it, and a great many of them go to the well. I am thankful I have heard Miss Van Rensselaer, and shall report her when I get home. , Mr. Piatr. A year or two ago, before the Connecticut State Grange in Hartford, Dr. Smith of Higganum, a good physician, presented an essay on the model kitchen. One prominent way in which he made it was to have a revolving cupboard in the kitchen to contain the pots and kettles and pans, and perhaps the flour. That was to have it convenient and save steps; and he did away with the cupboard under the sink, and made the kitchen more sanitary. I would like to ask the lec- turer if such a revolving cupboard has been put in use and found a desirable thing. I never saw one, and I don’t know where you could find one. The doctor himself said he didn’t put one in his own house because his wife objected to it for some reason or‘other. I would like to ask the lecturer if she ever heard of one. Miss VAN RENSSELAER. I did hear of one, but I have never seen one; but I don’t see why it wouldn’t be a good thing. One great difficulty in all of these things is very often the 126 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [ Jan; expense and that the help will not use them. This is oftener true of the help than the housewife. Not having any practical knowledge of that, I couldn’t say, but it would seem to me that it might be a saving of steps and time — you let the cupboard do the traveling instead of the woman. Pres. Stimson. My question, which I arise to ask, is right in line with the previous question. We see advertised on the market kitchen cabinets. I wondered if they had been brought into use very extensively. My question was prompted by the feeling that most men feel that if we adapt our houses so as to save steps, our wives will be stronger in most cases. I know that in my grandfather’s house the china closet was at the far end of the house, in the parlor, and over the fireplace in the par- lor was another cupboard devoted to some pewter ware brought out on state occasions. The big oven was near the center of the house, a room at least away from the kitchen. Now, very for- tunately, that house burned down, but there are still houses which have not burned down, and I have wondered whether kitchen cabinets would serve a beneficial purpose in this matter. Miss VAN RENSSELAER. My experience with kitchen cabi- nets is this: I would not want to keep house without one. The shelf is a good place for mixing things. You pull out a drawer here at the right, and you have cooking utensils; in another drawer you have spices, and possibly another place here for the flour, which is a great deal better than traveling off somewhere for it. It is better than going to the cupboard to get the necessary knives and spoons. Then it keeps things away from the dust, that is one thing. We have made quite a study of home sanitation in our Farmers’ Wives’ Reading Course — trying to get things under cover, trying to do away with the danger of disease, in connec- tion with the utensils and the food. I just take this occasion to say that I brought along a few of our Farmers’ Wives’ leaf- lets, which perhaps you will be interested im. There is one on “The Saving of Steps,, “ Decoration in the Farm Home,” 1905. | QUESTIONS. 127 “ Sanitation.”” These we have for free distribution in New York State. I don’t know as they suggest anything very new, but a few things to remind the women. (Question.) Have you anything there to remind the gen- tlemen? Why, yes —the first question in this oe Home Decoration.” I would say that we sent with the bulletin a quiz, a fourth page, containing perhaps ten or twelve questions which the women answered and sent back to us; then if they required any correspondence further we sent them letters. The first ques- tion is ““ Comment on the Attitude of the Men.” One woman said, ‘‘I made a perfectly lovely silk pillow, and a gentleman had gone and laid his head on it.” We have received answers from a great many on that subject, and I want to tell you that almost every lady is in sympathy with that gentleman who laid his head on that pillow, although they say they would make them out of gingham instead of silk. Then, too, out in New York State we are driving our hints straight home to the farm- ers when in this lesson on “Saving Steps” we talk about an ice house, about bringing water into the house, etc. We get very pathetic letters, letters which show to us what is needed perhaps more than anything else. When a woman says that she is becoming tired of the four walls of her kitchen, and she is thankful for a letter which is coming to her regarding her home life, and says, “Remember me in your prayers,’ when she wants sympathy from some one; when a woman says that she is very glad to get these lessons because her husband con- siders that it isn’t necessary to build a vegetable cellar, that it isn’t necessary to build a place for her to keep her provisions, and that it is trot, trot, trot into the kitchen all the time, we can feel that it would be a good thing to put in a few hints for the farmers, so our letters to the farmers’ wives are lessons to the farmer and his wife at the same time. Mr. Gotp. I am reminded just at this point that the last story that I have read in a magazine happens to come in just at 128 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [ Jan., this point. In Scribner’s last issue is the “ Corner Cupboard,” which is made the basis for a pleasant little story that reminds me somewhat of the kitchen cabinet. Have you seen “ The Corner Cupboard ’”’? Miss VAN RENSSELAER. No. Mr. Gotp. Look it up in Scribner’s, last issue, I believe. Mr. Hoyt. I have been hesitating for some time whether I ought to say anything about this important and vital, and I might say tender, subject. If there is anything that a wife hates to hear talked about it is for her husband to tell how his mother used to do things. Of course there is nothing that stimulates work as well as love for that work, and there is nothing that makes work such a drudgery as to have no love or heart in that work, and I am sorry to say the tendency at the present time is for both boys and girls to look upon work as a drudgery, therefore they do not like to do it. I know of instances where young ladies will not do a particle of housework because they haven’t the strength. It makes their backs ache to sweep, and yet they will take a stick and go into a forty-acre field and knock a ball all day long, and chase it about with perfect ease and contentment because their hearts are in it. It is no harder work to sweep than it is to knock a ball over a ten-acre field, neither should I think from the position that it would make the back ache any worse. My mind goes back to my boyhood days, and I see my mother doing her work, and her heart was in it. I have seen her, day after day, skim thirty pans of milk and carry it to the swill barrel perhaps forty feet away to empty it. I have seen her, and I have helped her, pick her forty or fifty geese every six weeks through the summer. I have seen her dip her five hundred candles twice a year into the tallow to make the candles for the family. We had men on the farm to work, and they boarded in the family. I have seen her, for rest, take her knit- ting needles and all the evening long, knit, knit, knit from the wool, perhaps, that she had carded, and knit for seven children 1905.] | DISEASES OF THE POTATO IN CONNECTICUT. 129 and herself and husband all the stockings and mittens and com- forters they needed. And I have seen the milk on the shelf, and the dozen pies which she made every Saturday afternoon. (My wife says she doesn’t believe it, but it is ‘a fact.) Her heart was in the work, and I never heard her complain. And she lived to be ninety-three years old. It isn’t work that hurts. When the heart is right work is a pleasure. I believe in mak- ing it as easy as you can for your wife in doing the work. We are not living in the days when we required so much of our wives and daughters as we used to, but it is wrong, as the lady has said, to bring up our children so that they will not know how to make a loaf of bread or a good cake, or to sweep the house or mend a stocking. What is a girl for, if she is going to be the wife of some person, if she doesn’t know how to do the first thing that is required of a prudent wife? The question of housekeeping today is going to be a serious one, a serious one. We cannot depend upon help as we have done in the past, neither out doors nor in, from the fact that it is more amusement and more pleasure that the young are looking for rather than for anything else. The Presiwent. The next number on our programme will be a lecture by Dr. G. P. Clinton of New Haven on “ Diseases of the Potato in Connecticut.” DISEASES OF THE POTATO IN CONNECHICUR. By Dr. G. P. Crinton, New Haven. Ladies and Gentlemen: Some of these troubles that I am to speak about are shown by photographs of the Experiment Station, which are in the room below, so that people who are interested especially in that subject can get some general idea from those pictures. There are many food plants more aristocratic than the ple- beian potato, but few that are more useful. The former kind we use occasionally to whet our flagging appetite, but for the people of the temperate zone no plant, save wheat alone, sur- AGR.—9 130 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jane passes this humble friend in its food value. In the United States it forms one of our most important crops, that of 1899 being valued at about $98,000,000. Like most of our agricultural plants, the potato seems to have certain regions or localities where it thrives best. With- out doubt the potato belt in this country lies along our northern border, since of the ten states producing crops of greatest value in 1903 five — Maine, New York, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota — lie in the northernmost tier of States, while the other five — Pennsylvania, Ohio, Illinois, lowa, and Colorado —lie just south of these. Another group of States in the central and northern Rocky Mountain region stands out as a potato district, but not so much so on account of the total values of the crops as on account of the great yields per acre—a result apparently largely due to irrigation. At present New ~York and Maine can best lay claim to be our greatest potato States. In the latter, Aroostook county in 1899 had planted about 42,000 acres, or a greater area than any other county in the United States, while the total value of the State’s crop in 1903 was over $9,000,000, and the average yield per acre — 196 bushels — was greater than in any other State. On the other hand, New York led every other State in the total value of the crop, which exceeded $19,000,000. There are certain conditions that make these northernmost States valuable for potato culture. This plant thrives best in a rather cool climate; it relishes plenty of moisture well dis- tributed through the season, and the mechanical and chemical condition of the soil must be to its liking. These conditions, apparently, obtain best in the above region. On the other hand, the potato responds as promptly as any other plant to intelli- gent husbandry, so the proper attention given the crop is a prominent factor in successful potato culture anywhere. So much for the value of the potato as an agricultural plant and its general condition in the United States. My point in this has been to suggest that here in Connecticut the potato may be classed as one of our most important agricultural plants, that the State itself may be considered a prominent potato State, especially if its size is taken into consideration, and that we may well increase the acreage. The following figures show the present situation: In 1903 the total area of the State planted with potatoes was about 29,000 acres — an increase of about 6,000 acres during the last thirteen years. This acreage 1905. | DISEASES OF THE POTATO IN CONNECTICUT. I31 was greater than that devoted to any other crops except hay and corn. The value of this crop was considerably over $2,000,000, being surpassed only by hay and tobacco. In New England the same year the State stood next to Maine in the value of the crop, and in the United States it was the eighteenth State in the value of its crop and the twenty-third in its acreage. The average yield the past ten years has been 96 bushels per acre. Except two years these average yields have been greater than those for the United States as a whole. While New York is considered a very important potato State, its average yield during this time has been only 83 bushels per acre. All the other New England States, however, surpassed this State in the average yield during the past ten years, though during the past five years our average has been equal to that of Massachusetts,*or 99 bushels per acre. The State lies just on the southern edge of the great potato district, but to offset this it enjoys the best market situation of any State in the Union, and it raises a good quality of tubers. As stated before I believe we are so situated that we should increase our acreage — in fact we are doing it. To do this with profit, however, we should also increase the yield per acre. There are three ways along which we may hope to accomplish this latter result: First. While the best methods of planting, of cultivation, and fertilization of the soil may be known, the chances are that they are not followed in 25 per cent. of the potato fields of the State. Director Clinton of Storrs gave you a paper along this line last year. We can assume at the outset that the very best methods are none too good for the agriculturist. Every farmer is bound by the nature of his occupation to be somewhat of an experimenter, and his own experience is the experience upon which he must rely in the end, but he should always strive to keep this experience up with or towards the best that his locality and the country affords. Second comes the factor of seed selection. This may in- clude selection of varieties, but I do not mean this so much as I do the selection of seed free from disease, of good shape and with a pedigree for yields. Neither do I mean such seed as you have bought upon representations that it was of this kind, but rather seed that you have raised yourself and by the rigid application of selection upon approved methods you 132 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., know to be of this character. Our agricultural literature now shows the results of selective tests, especially as applied to corn and wheat. Some work has even been done with the potato, and we know that the unit with which to work is the hill raised from a single tuber and not the tuber selected at random after it reaches the potato pile. We now have our seed breeders’ asso- ciations for discussion and improvement of methods. The work is reaching down to the farmer, who is beginning to apply what has been learned so far. Third comes prevention of insect injuries and fungous diseases. No one doubts that the potato in this State is severely _ troubled by these pests and that the financial loss they cause to the growers is far too great. Investigators have learned considerable about the life histories of these parasites and some- thing about methods for preventing their attack. The chief questions now are whether these methods should be more generally adopted by the potato grower and how practical are they. I do not believe that the consistent use of preventive measures against fungi will make any grower wealthy, but, on the other hand, I think most persons are undercautious rather than overcautious in this matter, and that in the long run intel- ligent preventive measures will pay. It is under this third phase of the question that I wish to indicate very briefly what we know about the fungous pests of the potato in this State and the methods that may be employed to lessen their ravages. They are six in number. 1. The Early Blight fungus produces subcircular, brown- ish spots about a quarter of an inch in diameter or more ex- tended and irregular areas at the margin of the leaf. The trouble occurs from June on and, so far as has been found, only on the leaves. My observations indicate that this is not so serious in this State as some suppose and that it is often con- fused with paris green burn or with tip burn. It may be pre- vented by spraying with bordeaux mixture, but it does not usually merit attempts at prevention. Paris green burn may also show as a general searing of the margins of the leaf, which dries up at the injured places. This injury to the foli- age often becomes serious and is of too common occurrence in the State. The damage results from sprinkling or dusting the foliage with pure paris green. A small amount of lime should always be used with it, as this keeps it from going into solu- 1905.] DISEASES OF THE POTATO IN CONNECTICUT. 133 tion when the caustic action on the foliage results. The tip burn trouble mentioned is purely physiological, due to the foli- age at its margin being unable in times of drought to replace and check the transpiration of water, consequently the tissues here turn yellow, roll up, and finally die. This trouble is not so common here as it is in some of the States of the middle west, since moisture is more evenly distributed during our growing season. 2. The Scab fungus apparently confines its attack to the tubers, where it produces a superficial, corroded, or “ scabby ” condition of‘the skin. The presence of the fungus acts as an irritant, and as a result an unusual development of corky tissue results. This growth of cork cells not only helps to protect the tuber from the scab fungus but it is also helpful in keeping out other fungi and bacteria that would cause subsequent rotting. Scabby potatoes, apparently, are not much more subject to rot than are those free from scab. Scabby potatoes occur all over the world, and many theo- ries have been advanced as to their cause, but it was not until Professor Thaxter, the first botanist of the New Haven station, studied the trouble that the true cause was shown. The fungus 18 sometimes seen on the scabby spots as a faint grayish mold that appears most prominent when the tubers are freshly dug. It is very simple in structure and easily breaks up into bacteria- like rods. It can also live in the soil and its development there is favored if this be slightly alkaline, instead of acid, and by the presence of manure. Other root crops, such as beets and turnips, are attacked, so that rotation of these with potatoes is not desirable. The most efficient preventive measures now known are selection of land as free as possible from the fungus ; proper rotation of crops; the use of clean seed; the careful use of ani- mal manure if scab has proved troublesome; avoiding liming land used for potatoes; and seed treatment with formalin or corrosive sublimate. This latter process consists in soaking the tubers for about one and a half hours in corrosive sublimate (one pound to 50 gallons of water), or in formalin (one pound to 30 gallons of water). To get the best results treated seed should be planted on land free from the fungus and but little manure used. 3. The Rosette or Rhizoctonia disease has lately come into 134 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., prominence in the literature dealing with potato diseases in this country, though it has been known and discussed for some time in Europe. It is called the rosette disease because the green vines often show the trouble by a rosette clustering of the leaves. Finally some of the plants may turn a sickly yellowish color and eventually die, but ordinarily the diseased condition does not manifest itself above the ground. The trouble is caused by a rhizoctonia, or sterile fungus that is carried on the tubers. During the past two years this stage has been very evident on the potatoes sold in this State. It shows as black- ish growths of threads, usually compacted into sclerotia, or superficial flattish masses, which are a quarter of an inch or less in diameter and which occur more or less distinct or run together over the tuber. Very often these escape notice or are mistaken for dirt, but if the potato is washed and examined while wet they become very evident. These compacted sterile cells carry the fungus over the winter in a dormant condition, but when the tubers are planted in the spring they develop a mycelial growth that crawls up onto the young shoots. On these, beneath the ground, the fungus often inflicts serious injury by attacking the superficial tissues, sometimes com- pletely girdling the stems with a dead area. This attack often results in the death of the parts beneath, in which case new tuberous shoots must be formed above the dead area. The final result, then, is a crop of small potatoes or a greatly dimin- ished yield. By the latter half of June and in July the fungus appears just above the ground, surrounding the stems with a grayish, mealy, rather inconspicuous growth for a distance of an inch or two. This is the fruiting stage of the fungus, and while not at all like the toadstools in appearance the manner of its spore production places it with this group of fungi. Both the fruiting stage on the stems and the rhizoctonia stage on the tubers have been known in Europe, but their relationship was not suspected. Only recently Mr. Rolfs of Colorado, while studying the cause of the potato failure of that State, has proved their connection. During the past season the writer has observed the development of the fungus in this State and has no doubt of the relationship of these forms. In some fields from fifteen to twenty per cent. of the hills were observed with the fruiting stage on the stalks. However, we were not able to trace so serious injury to the infected plants as has been reported in some other States. 1905.| | DISEASES OF THE POTATO IN CONNECTICUT. 135 As this trouble is carried on the seed tubers and as it be- comes established in the soil, the preventive measures must be the same as those used against scab. Two experimenters have tried formalin and found this more or less efficient. The chief objection to it is that sometimes the germination of the tubers is retarded or injured enough to decrease the yield. 4. Bacterial Bight and Rot. ‘There is a bacterial disease, usually to be found in our potato fields in June and July, that attacks a plant here and there. This trouble generally infects less than two per cent. of the vines. The plants assume a sickly yellowish color, remain stunted, and finally wither and die. These plants are easily pulled from the soil, when it is seen that the stem below is more or less rotted. Even in the early stage; while the plants are still green, if cross sections are made of the stems the bundles will often show a brownish diseased condition while the rest of the tissue is healthy. This diseased condition of the bundles interferes seriously with the proper conduction of water and plant food. The disease becomes most prominent in the underground stem; the tissues of the pith col- lapse, leaving a hollowed center, in which stage the plants look as if attacked by the stalk borer, and eventually the whole stem rots off. Practically no potatoes are obtained from these plants. Later in the season, especially after the true blight has killed the vines, one often finds that the tubers are rotting from a slimy, sticky, ill-smelling rot. This is also caused by bacteria though sometimes attributed to the blight fungus. A year ago this was a very common trouble in our potato fields. It is quite possible that the bacterial blight of the stems and the rot of the tubers are caused by the same organism. The fact that the tubers usually begin to decay at the stem end points to this relationship. In the way of preventive measures we have little to suggest beyond care in the selection of seed and the removal of diseased tubers from the field when dug. 5. Fusarium Wilt or Dry Rot is a fungous trouble in its effects somewhat like the bacterial disease just described. The fungus invades the stem underground and reaching the bundles chokes these with a growth of its threads so that eventually _the water supply of the plant is cut off or greatly reduced, when the parts above ground wither and die. We have had 136 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan, some obscure wilt troubles in our potato fields, though as yet the writer has not recognized this as the cause. In the tubers, however, it has been found as a very common agent of decay, with the bacterial rot being largely responsible for the trouble a year ago. The disease usually begins at the stem end, form- ing a slow dry rot. Not unfrequently bacteria occur with it and help the rot along. When the infected tubers are placed in a moist atmosphere the fungus breaks out on the surface in small white fruiting tufts. The decay continues in the cellar, though probably not so vigorously as in the fields, especially after the tubers become dried out. Often tubers show the pres- ence of the fungus only in cross section by a slight discolora- tion of the bundles. These tubers, when planted, no doubt help to perpetuate the disease. Because the fungus develops inside the tissues of the tuber, seed treatment is of little value against this trouble. Our pre- ventive measures so far are limited chiefly to the selection of seed tubers free from the fungus. 6. True Blight or Downy Mildew is the last and most important of these parasites of the potato. It is an old trouble, has proved very injurious in Europe and here in years past, and has been much studied both to gain facts in its life history and to prevent its ravages. Blight first appears on the potato leaves in this State anywhere from the first of July to the latter part of August. Its time of appearance and the severity of attack depend on weather conditions. If after its appearance there occurs a moist or muggy period of several days’ duration, it develops with surprising swiftness and carries off the vines in a short time. The fungus produces blackish areas, usually beginning at the tip or margin of the leaves, and these increase more or less rapidly according to the weather. Examining the underside of an infected leaf the fruiting stage is seen as a faint whitish growth at the juncture of the diseased and healthy tissues. In dry weather these moist blackened tissues dry up. Under favorable conditions the disease progresses so rapidly that there soon remain only the green stems and these then die as a result of the death of the leaves. Ina week the blackened dead stems will wither up. Inconspicuous leaves may take the place of the former luxuriant green field. Occasionally one sees diseased spots on the stems, but so far as I have been able to observe we have no reason to believe, 1905.] | DISEASES OF THE POTATO IN CONNECTICUT. 137 as do some, that the fungus passes down the stems to the tubers. So I see no reason for pulling up the vines to prevent the tubers rotting from this trouble. The tubers, however, do become infected with the fungus, apparently by the spores fall- ing from the leaves to the ground and washing down on them. After gaining entrance to the tuber the fungus causes a slow, dry, reddish-brown rot. Bacteria and the Fusarium fungus, however, often gain entrance as the result; the blight infection and these agents make the trouble much more serious. A tuber containing the blight fungus often shows a pitted surface, has a reddish tinge, and the skin may often be easily separated from it, while in cross section the reddish-brown diseased tis- sue usually shows most prominently in a band at the surface. So far as we now know the blight fungus is perpetuated only by the mycelium carried over the winter by these infected tubers. Just how the disease is transferred from these to the leaves is not definitely known, though it is believed by some that the mycelium passes from the tubers up into the stems and leaves. Personally I do not believe this occurs. Theoreti- cally the fungus should possess thick walled resting spores to carry it over the winter. Such spores have been found in decaying tubers and leaves and associated with the blight fun- gus, but their real relationship has never been definitely proved, and botanists are disinclined to believe that such a stage exists. The writer has recently been striving to settle this point, but so far has found little that is new to add to our knowledge of the fungus. Artificial cultures of the fungus have been grown on sterile media in test tubes. Slices of potato taken from the interior of the tubers under conditions to exclude bacteria and spores of fungi and inserted into a ‘sterilized test tube contain- ing a plug of cotton saturated with water have afforded the best substance for the growth of the fungus. These slices of potato are not decayed by the fungus, thus showing that the decay in nature is due to the bacteria and other fungi which closely follow the blight fungus. So far only the summer spore stage of the leaves has developed in these cultures. The blight fungus decreases the yield of potatoes in two ways. First, by the premature killing of the vines a month or six weeks before they should die, the possible yield is dimin- ished sometimes by half, as it is during the last weeks of the plant’s natural life that the tubers rapidly make their growth. 138 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., Second, the full or partial yield of the plants may be obtained and then cut down more or less by the subsequent rotting of the tubers. If I can judge accurately from an experience extend- ing over only three seasons, the blight, when it comes on early and suddenly, as it did in 1902, may cause a small crop with but few rotten tubers; but when it develops late and lags along slowly to the end of the season, as it did somewhat in 1903, but more especially this past season, we may grow a larger crop that suffers severely from rot. This rotting no doubt develops worse in a season like the past because more spores through a longer period are washed down onto the tubers than are when the vines are blighted and dead inside of a week. Finally let me give briefly the preventive measures that may be used against this fungus. We may grow the early varieties with their smaller yield and higher prices. These are often nearly matured by the time the blight appears and so suffer much less than late varieties. However, they are not without their diseases, and on the whole are not so popular with growers as are the late varieties. Knowing that the blight is carried in the tubers, all potatoes showing any signs of the disease, especially a reddish discoloration of the tissues when cut open, should be rejected. While evidence so far goes to show that it makes no difference if rotten tubers are left in the field, yet we may be mistaken about the ability of the fungus to develop winter spores in these, in which case it would be an error not to gather them up. Cultivation that tends to cover the tubers deeply in the soil and at the same time keep the ground from becoming wet—such as ridge culture— seems to be best adapted to prevent the tubers from rotting. This system also tends to hold up the vines and allow freer circulation of the air for drying out the soil and evaporating moisture from the leaves. ‘Too close planting and too luxuriant growth of foliage, for the opposite reason, favor a more rapid development of the blight. Some work has been done on the selection and breed- ing of blight-proof varieties. The government is said to be at work along this line. One rarely sees any indication of blight-proof individuals in our fields, so we should not be dis- appointed if we get no relief from this direction. Spraying with bordeaux mixture has given more or less excellent results. The writer’s experiments along this line have given some encouraging and some discouraging figures as to yields. 1905. | DISCUSSION. 139 If he was a potato grower, however, he would not hesitate to use this method of combating the fungus, believing that it would pay in the long run. Spraying with the bordeaux mix- ture should begin about the middle of July and at least three applications of two to three barrels per acre should be given. The second application might be given about the first of August and the third after the middle of that month. One, however, must use his judgment as to the exact time and the number of applications, as these depend upon the weather. The proper thing is to have the foliage well covered with the mixture when the blight weather comes on. When needed, paris green — one-half pound to the barrel — may be added to the mix- ture to fight the potato bug, and there is no danger of burning the foliage. There is considerable work about spraying large fields and it necessitates a convenient and good water supply. The geared sprayers that pump out the mixture as the horse _carries the apparatus along are rather unsatisfactory for use with bordeaux mixture, since they do not sufficiently drench all parts of the foliage even when driven over the same rows a second time from the opposite direction. A barrel pump car- ried on a one-horse cart — one that can straddle two rows of potatoes — with one man to pump and drive and two to follow on foot, each with a sixteen to twenty-foot hose provided with a single nozzle and spraying two or three rows as he goes, is the most efficient way of spraying a field, but it takes time and labor and lots of the mixture. DISCUSSION. The Secretary. You will notice Dr. Clinton is the only speaker on our programme who has ever spoken before at a midwinter meeting. I happened to be at Dr. Clinton’s labora- tory in October and found he was at work upon a scientific investigation of the diseases of the potato in Connecticut. I thought it was too important a subject to be neglected, there- fore he was asked to speak on this subject before you today. There are two questions I would like to ask him. The first is in regard to the selection of seed. If I understood him cor- rectly he recommends selecting seeds from the plants before 140 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., the potatoes are dug. The second is, whether we shall con- tinue to plant our own seed, seed which we grow, or whether we shall get new seed every year. I know in large potato growing sections in many parts of the country they will not plant their own raised seed, but they will go to Maine or New York for seed every year. I’d like to get an answer from Dr. Clinton on these points. Dr. CLinton. Our method of seed selection is this: First I call attention to the fact that you can breed up good strains of plants just as you can breed up good strains of animals, but it has got to be by selection. It has got to be rigid and carried through some years. Our plan of selection is like this: We go through the field and mark out the most vigorous vines — those freest from disease. At the end of the season we dig those vines and you select only from those that have got not necessarily the largest potatoes or those that have the largest number, but those that have the best shape, freest from disease, and that indicate the largest total yield, also selecting for the size or type of potato that you want. You select very carefully in this way, and the very best that you find. Then take the potatoes next spring and plant a little plot of those whole tubers so that you know that the vine comes from a single cutting. Then you go through the crop at the end of that season, and from them select the very best individuals, the same as the pre- ceding year, and plant those the third season. The fourth season you can make your selection a little larger and plant enough so that from that crop you will have enough to plant your whole acreage the succeeding year. You have had four seasons’ selection. The fifth season you may plant your crop from those selected plants. Each year keep up the selective process. At the end of the tenth you have been selecting the best tubers from certain points. If there is anything in evo- lution or breeding up one individual from another, you have perhaps accomplished that result. I know it can be done in other things — in corn and wheat — and they are doing it with 1905. | DISCUSSION. I4I the potato. The ordinary method is to go to the potato pile to pick out the best tubers there. That is partially right, but it isn’t the whole truth. The best potatoes you pick may have come from a vine that gave a very small yield, but, if you have one potato vine in that yard that has given a large yield of medium sized potatoes, free from disease, you want to get that and try to build it up from year to year. Now, there is something in bringing in seed from different regions to renew the vitality of plants, but not so much as ordinarily supposed. I do not think that the man that had been bringing in seed from outside that was not selected would have the results that a man would have who selected in this way. Secretary Brown. I would like to hear Professor L. A. Clinton, Director of Storrs Experiment Station. Mr. Cyrinton. Mr. Chairman, I was talking with a gentle- man in the back part of the room and I don’t know what you want me to talk about. The PresIDENT. Potatoes. Mr. Cxiinton. This year I sprayed our potatoes seven times, and they nearly all rotted with us. Now, I didn’t lose my faith in spraying at all, but I have come to this conclusion: that if we are going to spray we have got to do it more thor- oughly than I did it this year, not more times, but it has got to be hand work. I sprayed seven times with one of the auto- matic spraying carts. That is an easy way of getting it done. You can go over an acre in a morning before breakfast, if you get up early enough, but it doesn’t keep the potato from rotting. The only way I have found effective to keep potatoes from rotting is to have one man get on the cart and hold the pump handle, and stay right by them and get them thoroughly cov- ered with the mixture, the under side of the leaves, and the stem as well as the under side. That means strenuous work, but I believe it is better for the farmer to go over the potatoes two or three times and spray them that way rather than seven or eight times with an automatic spraying cart which lets them 142 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [ Jan., rot after all. Even by our spraying, as we sprayed this year, we increased our yield on the sprayed field very perceptibly. Our increased profits per acre were about eighteen dollars, and that paid us well for the spraying that we did. Next year I shall spray, but I shall do the larger part of the work with a hand sprayer and stay right by them until we get them done. I shall spray part of the field with an automatic spraying cart and leave part unsprayed for a test. Another thing that I will do is to plant a variety which will mature in August. I shall grow an early variety even at the expense of yield at first. We can grade up our early varieties so that we can get a larger yield. I want a grade, an early variety, that will mature in August, and I shall grow them and try to get ahead of that late blight. It is a problem how we are going to keep the blight from rotting them after we get them grown. I believe that it means a hand spray or else an early variety. The variety I secure for early planting is called the Early Manisted. I got less favorable results this year, not that I didn’t in- crease the yield, but I lost it afterwards by the rotting of the potatoes. I don’t say that spraying is going to save them; we are going to have failures, but if you don’t do it thoroughly you are going to have more failures, but a large part of the increased yield that I got from spraying was afterwards lost from the rotting of the potatoes. The sprayed part gave a greater yield than the unsprayed. The question is how to prevent the rotting —that is the hardest part of the problem. Professor Bennett of Storrs College carried on some ex- periments this year. Mr. Bennett sprayed his by hand and did his work very thoroughly. I think it might be interesting for Mr. Bennett to tell the results he secured. Mr. Bennett. I have been trying to find out whether spraying would prevent potatoes from rotting. This year I planted a plot of potatoes, six rows, three of which I sprayed and three I left unsprayed. I kept the bugs off of both, and as soon as the potatoes were up I sprinkled them with bordeaux 1905. | DISCUSSION. 143 mixture. I did a good job with the hand sprayer and kept putting this bordeaux onto the potatoes about once a week, covering them all thoroughly. In all I made ten applications. The frost struck them September 23d. The unsprayed plot was dead entirely, no blight there, just turned yellow. The sprayed plot was in as good condition as it was during the summer. If that frost had held off we would have got a better yield than we did. When we dug our potatoes, we got seven bushels from the unsprayed plot, and fourteen bushels from the sprayed plot. When we dug them I think we found one decayed potato in the sprayed plot; since then I have found, I guess, half a dozen potatoes that were decayed quite badly. About three weeks afterwards I looked them over again and picked out from twenty to thirty. The question is whether it paid us. We think it isn’t necessary to spray a great number of times. Professor Jones has increased his yield every year — increased from 26 per cent. to 196 per cent., an average of 75 per cent. increase — but he has not controlled the rotting. His potatoes each year have rotted more or less. He has only sprayed two or three times. I should recommend spraying about three or four times, beginning about the time you expect the blight will appear on the potatoes, but it must be done thoroughly. I did not intend to leave practically any space on those plants that were not covered, and I think I didn’t leave very much. They had a double spray each time by lifting up the vine and spraying all over. I wanted to see if we could stop the rotting. The plot, I think, had been manured with barnyard manure to a small extent. The land was pretty rich in the first place, and during the season, after the plants were up, I sprinkled between the rows a coat of nitrate of soda and phosphate of potash, about six hundred pounds of the combined material. Adjourned until two o’clock. 144 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., AFTERNOON SESSION. December 15, 1904. Convention called to order at 2 P. M. Vice-President Seeley in the Chair. The PRESIDENT. We will open our exercises this afternoon with some music. Music. The PresipENtT. We have this afternoon a very important subject to be brought before us, “ Thoroughbred Poultry versus Mongrels, from the Farmers’ Standpoint,”’ by Mr. Morris F. Delano, of Millville, N. J. THOROUGHBRED POULTRY VERSUS MONGRELS, FROM THE FARMERS’ STANDPOINT. By Morris F. DELANO of Millville, N. J. Mr. President and Ladies and Gentlemen: Before starting my paper I would like to tell you that I fully realize it will be very short from a rhetorical standpoint. It is simply a practi- cal paper from my own personal experience, and I am simply trying to tell it in as interesting a manner as I can. The number of farmers who consider the mongrel barn- yard fowl “just as good” is growing smaller every year. There are several causes that are revolutionizing their point of view, and making them realize the value of the thoroughbred in poultry, as well as in other live stock. Among the principal ones are, first, the press. Every leading agricultural paper now has a department devoted to poultry, with its competent poultry editor. Original articles are now demanded by readers to fill the columns of these departments. The old hit or miss style, where the liberal use of the scissors provided the bulk of the matter for this department of each paper, no longer goes. Farmers are getting more and more particular as to quality of reading given them, as number of periodicals to choose from multiplies. 1905.] THOROUGHBRED POULTRY VERSUS MONGRELS. 145 The growing popularity of poultry topics has been recog- nized by our leading newspapers. They often print articles in their daily editions, and devote a page in their weekly edition to poultry. As a rule they confine themselves to clippings, but the near future will alter this, and they will follow the lead of the straight agricultural papers, and will add a poultry editor to their staff. The exclusive poultry press is gaining in numbers, and in circulation every day. They are going more and more to the farmers, and those interested in the bread and butter side of the industry. Several of the leading papers have from twenty-five to forty-five thousand subscribers, and their lists are increasing at a rapid rate. Next in importance in arousing interest, and reaching a larger number each year, are the State Agricultural Colleges, with their extensive experiments and valuable data collected concerning same and put in tabulated form for circulation. More and more of our bright lads are learning to appreciate the generous living to be earned by following poultry raising as a business, and many of them are taking the courses at our State colleges, and coming out with their diplomas to wake up those of us who have gained our knowledge in the longer course of experience. They gain a good theoretical grounding, and also have some practical experience instilled in them in a much shorter time than they would have gained the same knowledge in any other way. In the near future, the colleges will demand longer courses, and more practical work from their poultry students before granting them diplomas, and when this time comes they will take an even higher place among the sources of poultry wisdom. Many States are introducing Institute work, with lectures followed by discussions, at central points. The method of your State Board of Agriculture is really better, I believe, as it brings more interests together, and is more apt to reach men who have never given poultry a serious thought — simply left it to their wives to produce pin money with. The combination of all these powerful movements, with several others I have not mentioned, is doing the poultry indus- try a world of good. . It has been demonstrated beyond all shadow of doubt, that thoroughbred poultry is a bigger money-maker than the mon- AGR. —10 ” 146 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., erel, considered from every point of view. Carefully and fairly conducted egg contests have proven them to be better egg producers. The fowls sold in the open market, after their days of usefulness as layers are past, have averaged to weigh more and have brought a higher price. The surplus cockerels killed off have been much heavier, and consequently brought more money. Besides these advantages, every farmer raising thoroughbred poultry works up some trade in stock for breed- ing purposes. This latter source of income will vary greatly with the man. If he will take enough interest in his flock to try and make it uniformly good, and will then hustle a bit in working up trade, he will soon find this feature of his flock bringing in many welcome dollars. Later on I will make a few suggestions that may help somewhat along this line. As a source of beauty and adornment on the place, the thoroughbred easily wins the blue. A man has a large variety ‘of colors to make his choice among, and, when he has chosen his favorite, each one of you will grant that he will enjoy and appreciate a uniform flock having color of his choosing much more than he will the motley conglomeration of all the rainbow hues possessed by the old time mongrels. Grade poultry well deserves consideration, and is a big improvement over mongrel stock. Vigorous thoroughbred male birds, crossed on mongrel females will, as a rule, produce cockerels that make better market poultry and pullets that are better layers than were the old flpck. It will take a long time to build up a flock in this way, but it is far better than the old method of inbreeding, or swapping for a likely cockerel with one’s neighbors. A better class of grade poultry is produced by making first crosses of thoroughbreds with an especial purpose in view. For instance, a White Leghorn male bird crossed with Light Brahma females will produce pullets that are better layers than straight Brahmas, and cockerels that mature earlier than do the Brahmas, and weigh much more than do the Leghorns. A Plymouth Rock-Brahma or a Wyandotte-Brahma cross will make better market poultry, but not quite as good a layer as does the Leghorn crosses on Plymouth Rocks, and Wyandottes produce quicker ,growing broilers and good, plump roasting chickens, as well as making a good laying cross. All the crosses I have mentioned are good, and are largely 1905. | THOROUGHBRED POULTRY VERSUS MONGRELS. 147 grown. My own experience has been that these cross-bred chickens are not enough better than the thoroughbred, in the particular point you are after, to counterbalance their many weak points. In choosing cockerels for crossing purposes, breeds to cross, or a breed to be kept pure, you should consider thor- oughly what you wish it for, and then select the breed that will do you the most good. There is some one breed that will exactly fill your requirements, and it is then simply a matter of your own personal color preference that will determine the variety. Most breeds have several varieties distinguished by color alone. The shape of all varieties of the same breed should be the same, but varieties of color are nearly legion. For instance, we have ten varieties of the Wyandotte, seven of Leghorns, five of Plymouth Rocks, and so on. Before suggesting breeds, I will first take up the branches of the industry and outline these. This is the day of the specialist. The poultry industry is beginning to feel the trend in this direction, and the most successful poultrymen today are those devoting themselves to one, or at most two, of the important branches of the business. The chicken is marketable at several stages of its development, but to produce the best quality at any given age it is necessary to vary the feed right from the shell. Market poultry can be graded in five classes ; squab broilers, broilers, small roasters, large roasters, and stewing fowls. The first class requires a Io to 16 oz. chick. This weight, in good order, is reached in five or six weeks. The broiler weighs three to four pounds to the pair, and is finished in 8 to 14 weeks according to parent stock, and size demanded. In roasting chicks, the weights most desirable are from 10 to 12 pounds to the pair. Asa rule, they command top prices at this weight. There is a growing demand, however, for extra good soft roasters, weighing 8 to 12 pounds each. These choice big fel- lows are even better eating than are turkeys, and when they become more generally appreciated, they will need to be grown in large numbers. This top weight has been reached in six months. It takes good vigorous parent stock, and an ex- perienced feeder to drive them quite as quickly as this, however. Stewing fowls are desired plump, with yellow skins, and as 148 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., young as your conscience will force you to put them on the market. Prices for market poultry are governed, first by trme of year, and second by condition. I put the season first simply because best prices are determined by fashionable trade to a certain extent, and because it is much easier to condition poul- try at some parts of the year than at others. Good squab broilers rarely ever fall below 60 cents per pair in New York, or Philadelphia, while Boston market seldom goes as low as this for top quality stock. The highest price I ever received was $1.40 per pair for selected chicks in private trade. A full season’s record averaged 81 cents per pair for the output. Our average cost to produce was about 50 cents per pair. This could have been reduced somewhat if we had been able to procure more hatchable eggs. Squab broilers are used at luncheons, both in private families and at hotels and clubs. They make a much better appearance than does a regu- lar broiler, served split. Broilers should weigh 3 to 4 pounds to the pair, and range in price from 20 to 60 cents per pound. Have known price to remain constant at 35 cents for six weeks at a time. From February to September the average price in a good season will be about 32 cents for first quality chicks. The best broiler is one we can plump up at eight weeks, and have it reach one and one-half pounds weight. This size, in perfect condition, and with good yellow legs and skin, will bring top market price. It will cost about 30 cents to produce a first class 2-pound broiler, and a little less for a 1%4-pound chick. You will see that this leaves a good margin of profit in this branch of the industry, and market is never over-stocked with Ar products. Before going on with roasters, will say a word about feed- ing broiler chicks for best results. I have made very careful experiments covering several years’ time, and, having tried almost every method, have chosen this as the most successful: We do not remove chicks from the incubator until they are 24 to 36 hours old. Simply remove trays, open ventilators, and allow machine to run down to a temperature of 95 degrees or less. This will allow chicks to finish thoroughly the assimi- lation of the yolk of the egg which has been their nourishment during the formative period, and will bring them from the machine chipper, and ready for trouble. The first feed they 1905.] THOROUGHBRED POULTRY VERSUS MONGRELS. 149 get is fine chick grit, and a clean fountain of pure water. We then feed a cake composed of bran, rolled oats, enough mid- dlings to stick it, fine grit, fine shell, and well mixed with milk. No rising timber of any kind is used. This mixture we put in large flat pans, and bake in a slow oven for four or five hours. When cool, we crumble up, and feed twice a day. The other three feeds we give a mixture of cracked grains, seeds, and grit, very similar to the leading commercial brands of chick feed. The fine grain is thrown in cut clover litter for the first few days, but we soon graduate them to planer shavings. We try and feed exactly enough to keep their appetites on edge, and have them watching eagerly for attendant as he comes along with next meal two hours later. The working chick is a healthy animal, and conversely, the healthy chick is a worker. When we are forcing chicks for broilers we put a box of beef scrap in their pen when they are two weeks old, and let ' them eat what they wish. They will soon become accustomed to it, and will not gorge. It is a big factor in producing quick growth. Perfect cleanliness is absolutely necessary to suc- cessfully raise broiler chickens. The production of roasters is getting to be more and more a profitable and prominent branch of the poultry industry. My personal experience with this branch has been very limited. We market each fall several hundred off-colored specimens from our thoroughbred flocks, but have never forced growth from shell to roaster age. If I were to do so, would start in the same as with broiler chicks, but not feed the beef scrap until about 3 weeks old. Beginning with the fourth or fifth week, would make one feed a day of a good concentrated mash food, and gradually increase number of mash feeds until we were feeding it three times a day with mixed grains in be- tween. This method would help grow larger frames, and not force plumpness too quickly. The cockerels in a flock of chickens you are raising to the roaster age should be caponized for best results. It not only increases their eating qualities, and consequently their market value, but it makes them docile, and does away with scrap- ping proclivities. This will enable them to convert all food into growth and not waste any energy in recovering from bat- tles with others in the flock. The modern cramming machine promises to revolutionize 150 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., the fattening of fowls. When marketed they should be plump, yellow as gold, and not over-fat. Experiment with the machine has produced this result in a shorter time, and with no more labor than other methods. A poultryman can combine all branches of the market in- dustry just described, or, better yet, can combine some one branch with the production of ducks for market. The rais- ing of broilers will conflict less with the ducks than will the production of roasters, as they are turned over more rapidly, and easier to drop when work on ducks becomes burdensome. A great number of small, as well as large poultrymen, specialize on producing market ducks. In some sections, and on some farms, the industry has reached enormous propor- tions. Two mammoth plants have an annual capacity of 100,- 000 ducklings. Many others, perhaps better money makers, produce 25,000 to 50,000 per annum. Besides these many .,, large plants, the number of farmers, or farmers’ wives, taking up this branch as a side issue is rapidly increasing. They are making money in every instance where they go about it right. Perhaps a few hints as to the way we raise ducks on our farm will help some of you. Our location, on sandy land, gently sloping to the shore of a beautiful lake, is almost an ideal one for ducks. Our breed- ing ducks have runways into the water, and we find our eggs more strongly fertile than are those laid by birds without swim- ming pools. To encourage those of you without available water, and who wish to give ducks a trial, will say that two of the most successful growers of ducks in New England do not have any water for their breeding birds to swim in, and think they do exactly as well without it. We begin setting duck eggs about January Ist, and con- tinue until they begin dropping off badly in fertility, or cease laying early in July. We hatched a few late in August this year, but eggs ran so poorly in fertility at that time of year it hardly paid us to bother with them. When our ducks finish hatching, we remove trays, and let them dry off in the incubator, as we do the chicks. Removing them to the brooder house at 36 or even 48 hours of age. Our first feed is a crumbly mixture of rolled oats, kiln dried bread crumbs, thoroughly mixed with raw egg beaten up, and milk. To this we add plenty of fine grit, and give pure water 1905. | THOROUGHBRED POULTRY VERSUS MONGRELS., I51 in clean fountains, giving depth enough for them to wash their nostrils, but not room enough to get in all over. We drop the egg, and work in a little middlings, meal, and beef after the first week. After the third week, drop the oats, and cut down the crumbs, and feed bran, middlings, and meal with about 5 per cent. beef scraps. The amount of meal and scrap we in- crease gradually, until at 6 or 7 weeks they are getting nearly half meal, and 15 per cent. scrap. At 10 weeks old our ducks will weigh Io to 12 pounds to the pair when fed on this diet. Prices for green ducks range from I5 to 35 cents per pound. The average price for best quality is about 18 cents for the season. It costs 50 to 60 cents to grow a duck to Io weeks age, leaving about 40 cents profit on each duckling computed on average prices for season. We use artificial means altogether in producing our market poultry, and, whether you raise 100 or 1,000 or more young- sters a year, it will pay you to give the incubator and brooder a thorough trial. They work when you want them to, and produce early youngsters to catch the high prices. Poultry raising on a large scale is absolutely impossible without their use. Geese are profitable to raise where one has pasture to turn them out on. They will require almost no grain food, and are nearly clear profit when marketed at Thanksgiving or Christmas time. Turkeys are rather hard to rear, but a sure market awaits the successful grower, and prices average higher every year. In marketing all kinds of poultry they should be dry picked to command top prices. Most sections of the country have a more or less competent man who does this work by the piece. We pay 3% cents each for chicks, and 7 cents each for ducks. In producing broilers, I have used eggs from mongrels picked up within a radius of ten miles of our farm, at a price 3 cents per dozen above the market price — eggs from Leg- horn crosses on Plymouth Rocks, and on Wyandottes, and eggs from thoroughbred Plymouth Rocks, Wyandottes, and a few other breeds. We have had some fair hatches and produced some At broilers from the mongrel eggs. The average quality was not good however. Our grade eggs have done better, and have made good chicks to weigh one pound each at six weeks age. 152 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [ Jan., Our thoroughbreds have averaged nearly as well at six weeks age, and after that time have run right away from both mon- grels and grades. For two years, now, we have raised nothing but thoroughbreds, and the rapidly increasing number of broiler raisers who are willing to pay $60 per 1,000 for eggs from good thoroughbred Plymouth Rocks, and Wyandottes proves that my experience is not unique in this respect. Last year we sold nearly 30,000 eggs for hatching, and this year our trade promises to exceed this amount. Am citing this merely to give you an idea of what the demand is for thoroughbred products at prices well in advance of market rates for eggs. During the fifteen years since 1889, I have tried nearly every popular variety. Will give you a brief synopsis of my experience, and reasons for choosing and retaining the varieties I now breed. My first thoroughbreds were Brown Leghorns, and Light Brahmas. At the same time I had a flock of cross-bred buff fowls, very similar to the present-day Buff Plymouth Rock, but several years before the latter were introduced as a dis- tinct variety. The Leghorns were good layers of medium- sized eggs. They were nervous, impossible to confine without mutilation with ordinary wire, and color of egg shell was against them on Cape Cod, where I had my early experience with poultry. The Brahmas were quite good winter layers of brown- shelled eggs of splendid size, and found them very profitable from that point of view. They were slow in growing to mar- ketable condition, and in maturing, and made poor market poultry below the roasting weight of eight pounds. The hens are also heavy awkward mothers. My buffs were good layers of fair-sized eggs. Made splen- did mothers, and were comparatively easy to break up from sitting. The chicks made rapid growth, and were ready to market in July and August, when my summer resort trade demanded them. They filled every requirement for me, ex- cepting at that time I did not consider them thoroughbred. Can trace my present fondness for the Buff Plymouth Rock right back to this flock of single-combed buff fowls that gave me such excellent results when I was a boy. The Langshan boom now came on in full blast, and I dis- carded Brahmas to make room for their lordly Chinese breth- 1905.| | THOROUGHBRED POULTRY VERSUS MONGRELS. 153 ren. Added both blacks and whites, and the next year the Barred Plymouth Rock. The Langshans are splendid winter layers, excellent mothers, and Ar flavor as table fowls. They have but one serious fault. The black, feathered shanks and white skin on the black variety, and blue shanks and white skin on the white variety absolutely spoil them as high-class market poultry, and make them second quality. These defects are all that pre- vent the Langshan from becoming one of our leading general- purpose fowls. The white shanks and white skin of the new English Or- pingtons will prevent them, too, from becoming popular in this country, as, to be widely bred, a breed must conform with the general requirements of the public taste. So far they demand yellow legs and skin on dressed poultry, and I have seen no signs of their becoming educated to anything different. The Barred Rock filled a niche in my regard from which no other variety has succeeded in ousting them. They are today, and probably will always be, one of our leading general pur- pose fowls. Their only drawback being dark pinfeathers when dressed for market. The buff and white varieties combine the good qualities of the barred, without this single defect. Their light-colored pinfeathers make theirs a most attractive carcass when picked by the expert. The Plymouth Rocks, barred, buff, or white, are good winter layers, first quality table poultry at any age, ideal mothers, and they are fine docile birds, stand- ing confinement well, or able to hustle for themselves where they are given the opportunity. The White Wyandottes were added to my yards in ’98, and have qualities that are unexcelled. Their rose combs, fitting closely to the head, are practically frost proof with ordinary protection. Their earlier maturity makes them lay a month ahead of the Rock in the fall, and this about counterbalances their being one pound smaller. Their laying qualities and well-rounded carcass when dressed make them the only serious rival the Plymouth Rock has as a general purpose fowl. In 1900 when moving from New England to southern New Jersey to start our present farm, I took with me a flock of 600 Barred, Buff, and White Plymouth Rocks, and White Wyandottes. That year added Buff Wyandottes to our flocks, and sold the White Rocks. 154 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. [Jan., On account of warmer climate, my thoughts now turned to the Mediterranean varieties, and bought a flock of nearly 300 Buff Leghorns, and some Minorcas. One winter’s ex- perience with these varieties was enough. They did not lay as well, with same attention, as did our other varieties, and the Leghorns were too wild and nervous to run in our yards containing oak trees. When time came for winter quarters we found it necessary to run them down daytimes, as a number of them preferred the tops of the trees as sleeping quarters to the comfortable coops provided for them. The Minorcas we discarded without quite as thorough trial, as they did not suit me personally, and wished to cut down breeds. That spring we bought over 1,000 Rhode Island Red eggs from the leading breeders and had quite a flock of them when fall came. They ran from light red through all shades of buff and yellow to pure white, and from dark red through the smoky shades to pure black. Selected the best birds and found them to be excellent winter layers and good hardy fowls. Did not find them ahead of our buff varieties in any way, and knew it would hurt our trade in fancy buffs to have a fowl on the place that was liable to breed specimens of a buff color, hence closed them all out the next year. During the past five years the Red breeders have made a wonderful amount of improvement in the uniformity of color in their flocks, as well as in excellence of individual specimens. They are a valuable general purpose fowl, and, while pins are a little darker than those of the buff and white varieties, they rival either in attractive appearance of the dressed product. During the past five years have made experiments with pens of Golden and Silver Wyandottes, White Leghorns, again with Brahmas and Langshans, and added the White Plymouth Rock once more. In turn they have been discarded, excepting the whites, and I now give my unqualified endorsement to the Barred, Buff, and White Plymouth Rock, and the Buff and White Wyandotte, as being the best all-round general-purpose fowl in existence, with Rhode Island Reds their nearest com- petitor. This is the result of my own personal experience, and not influenced in the least by the opinions of others. In choosing which variety of the above to give a trial, I will simply advise that you take the one best suited to your personal taste in color or form. ‘They vary so little in egg production, 1905.] THOROUGHBRED POULTRY VERSUS MONGRELS. 155 and in other desirable qualities, that hardly any two experi- ments or series of tests would bring the same variety out in the lead. We are all human, and, in a neck and neck race, most of us would be inclined to give a friendly push to our favorite. For this reason we are apt to do best with what we personally prefer. You will make no mistake in choosing any one of the five varieties named. In choosing a variety of ducks, we are not confronted by such a bewildering array as with chickens. We do not need to even consider the mongrel, or common puddle ducks, as at maturity they are no larger than the Pekins are at eight weeks of age. : Everyone knowing even the rudiments of duck culture will know that the Imperial Pekin Duck is raised by the thousand in America, while all other varieties combined are raised by the score. This is caused principally by the fact that, from the growers’ standpoint, they are an ideal duck. They are good eating, with plump, well-filled-out breasts; are quiet in their habits, with neither ability nor inclination to fly ; while they are splendid layers of hatchable eggs, hearty eaters, and put on meat and flesh more rapidly than does any other duck. A two-foot fence will retain them, so expensive yards are un- necessary. These many good points make them profitable to raise. The Rouen is colored very similarly to the Wild Mallard, and is more delicate in flavor of its meat than is the Pekin. They should weigh one pound more than the Pekin, but will hardly average as large. They will not grow as rapidly, but put on flesh very fast, it being quite hard to keep them in good breeding order. Several farms are making a specialty of growing them for private trade, and there is plenty of market for a larger number every year. The Muscovy, white or black and white in color, has many characteristics in common with chickens. They can fly as well, though probably not as far, as can the wild ducks. Our lake is about three-quarters of a mile wide opposite our farm, and our young Muscovies thought nothing of flying across and back for the exercise. Returning they would light in trees, on roofs of buildings, or on the ground, as their fancy dictated. Muscovies have been known to nest in hollow trees, up in the manger in the barn, and in other places where they are not apt 156 BOARD OF AGRICULTURE. _ [ Jan., to be molested, just as hens will. I have never had a Muscovy egg fail to hatch, when set on by a Muscovy duck. Have also never lost a duckling when the mother duck was left with her brood. They are the most fearless variety of ducks I know of, and quite easy to tame and make pets of if one has patience. Other varieties are too nervous and excitable, the Pekin being notably so. Another pleasant feature, where one has near neighbors, is the inability to quack. The Muscovy talks in a hoarse whisper, and never makes enough noise to annoy any one. The loud quacking of ordinary ducks makes them objec- tionable to any one within hearing not having a monetary interest. As a market duck the Muscovy is excellent. Plump, full- meated breast, and the minimum amount of fat, even on AI market specimens. The defects in the Muscovy as an ideal market duck and that prevent its more general growth are three in number. First is the difficulty in yarding them. They will require quite high fences, and without crippling them when they are half grown no fence will retain them. This requires covered pens and excessive cost. Second, the difference in weight of males and females.