Seat Ses ein POE re Ksee POPLINE na sea BERET ie: eet ‘tins asus BO fie S mgiad@ KVHGM UA LIC? ‘1 AdaG ABRUNE LEM Agyser 7 TELISSOH © B.NHOF "39 46 ra bE g pte BS GSE pe LTS ; uty i } Ie 4 De you e BY THE SAME AUTHOR. ON THE SENSES, INSTINCTS, AND _IN- TELLIGENCE OF ANIMALS. With Special Reference to Insects. With 118 Illustrations. Sixth Edition. Cr. 8vo. 5s. (I.S.S.) A CONTRIBUTION TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF SEEDLINGS. With nearly 700 figures in text. 2 vols. 8vo. 36s. net. A CONTRIBUTION TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF SEEDLINGS. Cr. 8vo. 5s. (I.S.S.) ON BUDS AND STIPULES. Cr. 8vo. 5s. (1.S.S.) London: KEGAN PAUL, TRENCH, TRUBNER & Co., Ltd. ® = J i i | i} I ; a al I My THE INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SERIES. VOL. XL. j ‘ Pe ; ‘ ch ; nerperey a Whee as Pig ry te CAte TP OL ee eee a ey Pee, Le ae ae Mt ech A Wedel cia, wa dar 2 een ice ; i ' i 5 : i a: > sf f=g Tew, ie - pF) ef 2 ‘ Plate 1. Fig1. Lasius niger §. 4 Myrmica ruginodis §. 2.—"— flavus ~. 5. Polyergus rufescens 3. Formica fusca». 6. Formica sanguinea ”. Kegan Paul, Trench, friibner &C® Ltd. ye , at J ¢ ~QDJode Cf “ANTS, BEES, AND WASPS A RECORD OF OBSERVATIONS ON THE HABITS OF THE SOCIAL HYMENOPTERA BY SIR JOHN LUBBOCK, lst BARON AVEBURY EIOe HERS.) DOs, BLO, SEVENTEENTH EDITION, REVISED THIRD IMPRESSION LONDON KEGAN PAUL, ‘TRENCH, TRUBNER & CO. LTD. BROADWAY HOUSE, 68-74 CARTER LANE, E.C. 1915 (The rights of translation and of reproduction are reserved) PREFACE. ee THis volume contains the record of various experi- ments made with ants, bees, and wasps, during the past ten years ; and most of which have appeared in the ‘Journal of the Linnean Society,’ for the years 1874 to 1882. Other occupations and many interruptions, political and professional, have prevented me from making them so full and complete as I had hoped. My parliamentary duties, in particular, have absorbed most of my time just at the season of year when these insects can be most profitably studied. I have, there- fore, whenever it seemed necessary, carefully recorded the month during which the observations were made ; for the instincts and behaviour of ants, bees, and wasps are by no means the same throughout the year. My object has been not so much to describe the usual habits of these insects as to test their mental condition and powers of sense. vi PREFACE. Although the observations of Huber, Forel, McCook, and others are no doubt perfectly trustworthy, there are a number of scattered stories about ants which are quite unworthy of credence; and there is also a large class in which, although the facts may be correctly recorded, the inferences drawn from them are very questionable. I have endeavoured, therefore, by actual experiments which any one may, and I hope others will, repeat and verify, to throw some light on these interesting questions. The principal point in which my mode of experi- menting has differed from that of previous observers has been that I have carefully marked and watched particular insects ; and secondly, that I have had nests under observation for long periods. No one before had ever kept an ants’ nest for more than a few months. Y have one now in my room which has been under constant observation ever since 1874, 2.e. for more than seven years.! ‘I may add that these ants are still (August 1882) alive and well The queens at least are now eight years old, if not more. PREFACE. vil I had intended to make my observations principally on bees; but I soon found that ants were more con- venient for most experimental purposes, and I think they have also more power and flexibility of mind. They are certainly far calmer, and less excitable. I do not attempt to give anything like a full life- history of ants, but I have here reproduced the sub- stance of two Royal Institution lectures, which may serve as an introduction to the subject. Many of the facts there recorded will doubtless be familiar to most of my readers, but without the knowledge of them the experiments described in the subsequent chapters would scarcely be intelligible. I have given a few plates illustrating some of the gpecies to which reference has been most frequently made ; selecting Lithography (as I was anxious that the figures should be coloured), and having all the species of ants drawn to one scale, although I was thus obliged in some measure to sacrifice the sharpness of outline, and the more minute details. I am indebted to Mr. vili PREFACE. Bates, Dr. GUNTHER, Mr. KixBy, and Mr. WATERHOUSE, for their kind assistance in the preparation of the plates. As regards bees and wasps, I have confined myself for want of space to the simple record of my own observations. I am fully conscious that experiments conducted as mine have been leave much to be desired, and are scarcely fair upon the ants. In their native haunts and under natural conditions, more especially in warmer climates, they may well be expected not only to manifest a more vivid life, but to develop higher powers. I hope, however, that my volume will at least show the great interest of the subject, and the numerous problems which still remain to be solved. Hie@H ELMs, Down, KEnT. October 18, 1881 COM TTt NT s. soem eOeecns CHAPTER I, INTRODUCTION. Position of ants in the Animal Kingdom—Ants divided into three families—Number of species—Mode of observation— Nests— Mode of marking ants—Stages in life of ants—Egg, larva, pupa, imago—Length of life—Structure of ants— Head, thorax, abdomen, antenne, eyes, ocelli, mouth parts, legs, wings, sting—Origin of the sting—Character of ants— Wars among ants— Modes of fighting —Queen ants— Workers —Different classes of workers—The honey ant—Soldiers— Origin of the soldiers—Division of labour—Habitations of ants—Communities of ants—Food—HEnemies—Character— Industry —Games—Cleanliness 6 : 5 CHAPTER II. FORMATION AND MAINTENANCE OF NESTS, Foundation of new nests—Doubts on the subject—Views of Huber, Blanchard, Forel, St. Fargeau, Ebrard—Experiments with queens— Foundation of a nest of Myrmica by two queens—Adoption of queens—Fertility of workers—Eggs laid by fertile workers always produce males—Queens seldom produced in captivity—Origin of difference between queens and workers—Longevity of ants—Arrangement of chambers in a nest—Division of labour—The honey ant x CONTENTS, CHAPTER III. ON THE RELATION OF ANTS TO FLANTS. FAGE Flowers and insects—Ants not so important in relation to flowers as bees, but not without influence—Ants seldom promote cross-fertilisation, and hence injurious to flowers— Modes by which they are excluded — Belt — Kerner — Aquatic plants — Moats — Dipsacus —Slippery surfaces— Gentian, snowdin, cyclamen — Concealment of honey— Antirrhinum, Linaria, Campanula, Ranunculus, Lamium, Primula, Geranium, &c.—Protection of honey by thickets of spines or hairs—Protection by viscid secretions—WSilene, Senecio, Linnea, Polygonum, &e.—Milky juice—Lactuca— Nectaries on leaves—Leaf-cutting ants—Ants as tree guards —Importance of ants in destroying other insects—Har- vesting ants—Solomon—The Mischna—Meer Hassan Ali— Sykes— Moggridge—Agricultural ants—Lincecum—McCook 60 CHAPTER IV. RELATIONS TO OTHER ANIMALS. Hanting ants—The Driver ants—Ecitons—Insects mimicking ants—Enemies of ants—Parisites— Mites— Phora— Domestic animals of ants—Aphides—Eggs of Aphides kept through the winter by ants—Blind beetles—Pets—Progress among ants—Relations of ants toone another—Stenamma—Solenopsis —Slave-making ants — Formica sanguinea — Polyergus — Expeditions of Polyergus—Polyergus fed by the slaves— Strongylognathus—Degradation of Strongylognathus—Aner- gates—Explanation of the present state of Strongylognathus and Anergates—Progress among ants—Phases of life— Hunting, pastoral, and agricultural species. . 63 CHAPTER V. BEHAVIOUR TO RELATIONS. Mr. Grote on ‘ Morality as a necessity of society ’—Behaviour of ants to one another—Statements of previous writers: CONTENTS. xi PAGE Latreille, St. Fargeau, Forel—Difference of character among ants — Experiments — Isolated combats—Neglect of com- panions :£ in trouble—Experiments with insensible ants— Drowned ants—Buried ants—Contrast of behaviour to friends and strangers—Instances of kindness—A crippled ant—A dead queen—Pehaviour to chloroformed friends— Behaviour to intoxicated friends , 5 : 98 CHAPTER VI. RECOGNITION OF FRIENDS. Number of ants in acommunity—They all recognise one another —All others are enemies—Recognition after separation— Strange ants never tolerated in a nest—Experiments—Be- haviour to one another after a separation of more thana year—Recognition unmistakable—How are they recognised? —Some naturalists have suggested by scent, some by a pass-word—Experiments with intoxicated ants—With pupa removed from the nest and subsequently returned—Separa- tion of a nest into two halves, and recognition as friends by the ants in each half of young bred in the other half—Pupx tended by ants from a different nest treated as friends in the nest from which they were taken, and as strangers if put into the nest of their nurses—Recognition neither per- sonal nor by means of a pass-word c 119 OHAPTER VII. POWER OF COMMUNICATION. Statements of previous writers: Kirby and Spence, Huber Franklin, Dugardin, Forel—Habit of bringing friends to food— Exceptional cases— Experiments to determine whether ants are brought or directed to stores of food—Scent—Ssight —Experiments with different quantities of food—Ants which returned empty-handed and brought friends to -assiat c : ; : 158 t) x CONTENTS. OHAPTER VIII. THE SENSES OF ANTS. PAGE S1GHT :—Difficulty of understanding how insects see—Number of eyes— Two theories—Views of Miiller, Grenacher, Lowne, Claparede—Appreciation of colour—Sensitiveness to violet—Perception of ultra-violet rays. HEARING :—An- tenn regarded by many entomologists as organs of hearing —Opinions as to whether ants, bees, and wasps hear— General opinion that bees and wasps can hear—Huber and Forel doubt in the case of ants—Experiments with ants— korel’s observations—Coionel Lung—Mr. Tait—Structure ot anterior tibia. THE SENSE OF SMELL : . 183 CHAPTER IX. GENERAL INTELLIGENCE. Statements of previous writers—Economy of labour—Experi- ments as to ingenuity in overcoming obstacles and econo- mising labour—Experiments with bridges, embankments, and moats—Earthworks—Ingenuity in building nests— Difficulty in finding their way—Experiments with movable objects—Sense of direction—Experiments with rotating disks— Experiments with rotating table—Influence of light 236 OHAPTER X BEES. Difficulty experienced by bees in finding their way—Communi- cation between bees—Bees do not by any means always summon one another when they have discovered a store of food—Bees in strange hives—Infatuation of bees—Weant of affection—Behaviour to queen—Sentinels—The sense of hearing—The sense of colour— Experiments with coloured papers—Power of distinguishing colours—Preference for blue—Influence of bees on the colours of flowers—Blue flowers—Paucity of blue flowers—Blue flowers of compara- tively recent origin : . . 27% CONTENTS. iii CHAPTER X1, WASPS. PAGE Communication among wasps—Like bees, they by no means invariably bring companions when they have discovered a store of food—Courage of wasps—Polistes gallica—A tame wasp—Power of distinguishing colours—Wasps less guided by colour than bees—Industry of wasps—A day’s work— Directness of flight of wasps . : 5 311 APPENDICES . ’ 2 5 : 324 INDEX . ‘ ° : : ‘ ; 425 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. —1oo——— All the figures are enlarged about four times. The sign § indicates a worker; ¢ amale; and ? a queen. PLATE I. Fig. 1. Lasius niger 8. | Fig. 4. Myrmica ruginodis §. » 2 »» jflavus 9. » 5. Polyergus rufescens §. » 3 Formica fusca 3% | » 6. Hormica sanguinea 9. PLATE II, Fig. 1. Atta barbara § major. | Fig. 4. Pheidole megacephala § py Ey A %3 minor. minor. my bh Pheidole megacephala % » 5. Formica rufa 8. major. PLATE III. Fig. 1. Gicodoma cephalotes % | Fig. 3. Stenamma Westwoodit 3 major. » 4. Solenopsis fugax §. » 2. Ceodoma cephalotes 3 minor. PLATE IV. Fig. 1. Camponotus inflatus %. Fig. 3. Strongylognathus testa » 2. Tetramorium caespi- ceus 9. tum §. » Anergates atratulus %. PLATE V. Fig. 1. Lasius flavus ?. | Fig. 6. Aphis. My Co = fp i. (0 | 9 7. Platyarthrus Hoffman ats. =A5 » larva. | seggit. Ronee Some ars 9» pwpa. | », Claviger foveolatus. . 5, Beckia albinos. | PLATE VI. Nest of Tetramorium. PLATE VIL. Nest of Lasius niger. LIST OF THE PRINCIPAL BOOKS AND MEMOIRS ANDRE, E. BATES, H. W. BELT, T. BERT, PAUL BLANCHARD, E. REFERRED TO. Desc. des Fourmis d’Europe. Reyv.et Mag. de Zool., 1874. The Naturalist on the Amazons. The Naturalist in Nicaragua. ‘Les animaux voient-ils les mémes rayonrs lumineux que nous?’ Arch. de Physiol, 1869 . Metamorphoses of Insects. Trans. by Duncan. BOISSIER DE SAUVAGES, l’Abbé. L’origine du Miel. Journ. de BUCHNER, L. BUCKLEY, S. B. BURMBEISTER, H. CurrTIs, J. DARWIN, C. DELPINO, F. DEwWITzZ, H. DUJARDIN, F. . EDWARDS, H. EvnDITT, H. L. EMERY, O, Physique, vol. i. Mind in Animals. On Myrmica molefaciens. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1860. . Manual of Entomology. On the Genus Myrmica. Trans. Linn. Soc., 1854. . Origin of Species. . Suirapporti delle Formiche colle Tettigometre. Ueber Bau und Entwickelung des Stachels der Ameisen. Zeits. f. Wiss. Zoologie, vol. xxviii. . Obs. sur les Abeilles. Ann. des Sci. Nat., 1852 Notes on the Honey-making Ants. Proc. California Acad., 1873. Die Ameisen-Colonien u. deren Mitbewohner Saggio di un ordinamento naturale dei Mir micidei. a xvl Kerry, ( FOREL, A. GELIEU, J. DE. GouLp, Rev. W. GRABER, VITUS GREDLER, V. GRIMM. HAGENS, Herr VON HEER, O. F Huser, P. AUXLEY, T. H. KERNER, Dr. A. KIRBY AND SPENCE LANDOIS, Dr H. LANGSTROTH, L. L. LATREILE, P. LESPks, C. LINCECUM, GIDEON . Lona, Col. C. G. LUBBOCK, Sir J. Luno, M . Flowers and their Unbidden Guests. LIST OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS, Le Formiche ipogei. Ann. Mus. Civ. di 8t. Nat. di Genova. . Fourmis de la Suisse. . Le Conservateur des Abeilles. . Account of English Ants. . Die Tympanalen-Sinnesapparate der Or- thopteren. . Der zoologische Garten. . Die Myrmecophilen. Stettin. Ent. Zeits., 1845. . Ueber Ameisengiiste. Berlin. Ent. Zeits., 1865. Ueber Ameisen mit gemischten Colonier.. Berlin. Ent. Zeits., 1867. Die Hausameisen Madeiras. GZiirich. Nat. Ges., 1852. . Natural History of Ants . On the Reproduction of Aphis. Trans Linn. Soc., xxii. 1859. Trans. by Ogle. Introd. to Entomology, . Thierstimmen; also Zeits. fiir Wiss. Zool. 1867. . Treatise on the Honey Bee. . Hist. Nat. des Fourmis. Sur les Mceurs de Lomechusa paradoxa, Ann des Sci. Nat., 1863. On the Agricultural Ant of Texas. Journal, 1861. Linr. . Central Africa. On the Anatomy of Ants. Trans. Linn. Soc 1879. Ova and Pseudova of Insects. Phil. Trans. 1858. Obs. on Ants, Bees, and Wasps. Parts 1-9, Linn. Journ., 1874-81. On Some Points in the Anatomy of Ants. Micros. Soc., 1877. Lettres sur les Habitudes de quelques Fourmis dn Brésil. Ann. des Sei, Nat., xxiii. 1831 LIST OF BOOKS AND MEMOIRS. XVli MoCoox, H. C. ” MARKEL, F. Mayr, Dr. G. L. ” MBINERT, F. MEYER, J. MULLER, P. W. J. ORMEROD, H, L. RAMBERT, M. . ROBERT, EH. ° ROGER, J. Note on Adoption of a Queen Ant. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1879. On the Nat. His. of the Agricultural Ant of Texas. . The Honey Ant of Texas. . Beit. zur Kenntniss der unter Ameisen ieban- den Insecten. Germar’s Zeit. Ent., i841. . Europ. Formiciden. . Leben und Wirken der einh. Ameisen. Myrmec. Studien. Ver. Zool. Bot. Verein in Wien, 1862. Bidrag til de Danske Myrers Naturhistorie. Kidbenhaven, Dansk. vid. Selsk., 1861. . Ueber coconlose Ameisenpuppen. Stettin. Ent. Zeit., 1854. . Beitriige zur Naturgeschichte der Gattung Claviger. Germar’s Mag. de Zool., 1818. . Natural History of Wasps. . Meeurs des Fourmis. . Observations sur les Mceurs des Fourmis, Ann. des Sci. Nat., 1842. . Beit. zur Kennt. der Ameisenfauna der Mittelmeerlinder. Berlin. Ent. Zeit., 1857. ST. FARGEAU, LEPELETIER. Hist. Nat. des Hyménoptéres. SAUNDERS, EDWARD Brit. Heterogyna and Foss. Hymenoptera. SAVAGE, T.5S SCHENK, Professor Trans. Mint Soc., 1880. . On the Habits of Driver Ants. Trans. Eni. Soc., 1847, . Beschr. Nassau. Ameisenarten. Stettin. Ent, Zeit., 1853. SIEBOLD, C. T. von. Ueber das Stimm. und Gehdrorgan der Or- SMITH, F. SYKES, Col. WESMAEL, C. WESTWOOD, J. O. thopteren. Weissmann’s Arch., 1844. Cat. of Brit. Foss. Hymenoptera. Essay on British Formicide. Trans Ent. Soc., N.S. vol. iii. p. 98. . Account of Pheidole providens. Trans. Ent Soc., 1836. . Sur une nouv. Espéce de Fourmi du Mexigue. Bull. de Acad. de Sci. de Bruxelles, 1838. . Modern Classification of Insects. Obs. on Typhlopone. Ann, Mag. Nat: Hist., 1841. , h ANTS, BEES, AND WASPS. CHAPTER I, INTRODUCTION. THE Anthropoid apes no doubt approach nearer to man in bodily structure than do any other animals; but when we consider the habits of Ants, their social organisation, their large communities, and elaborate habitations; their roadways, their possession of domestic animals, and even, in some cases, of slaves, it must be admitted that they have a fair claim to rank next to man in the scale of intelligence. They present, more- over, not only a most interesting, but also a very ex- tensive field of study. Ants are divided into three families: the Form icide, Poneride, and Myrmicide, comprising many genera and a large number of species. In this country we have rather more than thirty kinds; but ants be- come more numerous in species, as well as individuals, in warmer countries, and more than a thousand species B 2 NUMBER OF SPECIES. are known. Even this large number is certainly far short of those actually in existence.! I have kept in captivity about half of our British species of ants, as well as a considerable number of foreign forms, and for the last few years have generally had from thirty to forty communities under observation. After trying various plans, I found the most convenient method was to keep them in nests (see fig. 2, p. 43, and Plates VI. and VII.) consisting of two plates of common window glass, about ten inches square, and at a distance apart of from {5 to 4 of an inch (in fact just sufficiently deep to allow the ants freedom of motion), with slips of wood round the edges, the intermediate space being filled up with fine earth. If the interval between the glass plates was too great, the ants were partly hidden by the earth, but when the distance between the plates of glass was properly regulated with reference to the size of the ants, they were open to close observation, and had no opportunity of conceal- ing themselves. Ants, however, very much dislike light in their nests, probably because it makes them think themselves insecure, and I always therefore kept the nest covered over, except when under actual 1 T have had some doubt whether I should append descriptions of the British species. On the whole, however, I have not thought it necessary to do so. They are well given in various entomological works: for instance, in Smith’s Cat. of British Fossorial Hymen- optera, published by the Trustees of the British Museum ; Saunders’ ‘Synopsis of British Heterogyna,’ 7rans. Entomological Soc. London; and in Mayr’s Die Europ. Formiciden, all of which are cheap and easily procurable. I have, however, given figures of the principal species with which I have worked. MODE OF OBSERVATION, 3 observation. I found it convenient to have one side of the nest formed by a loose slip of wood, and at one corner I left a small door. These glass nests I either kept in shallow boxes with loose glass covers resting on baize, which admitted enough air, and yet was im- pervious to the ants; or on stands surrounded either by water, or by fur with the hairs pointing downwards. Some of the nests I arranged on stands, as shown in Fiq, 1. Bee ee be fig. 1. AA is an upright post fixed on a base B B. CC is a square platform of wood round which runs a ditch of water. Above are six nests, D, each lying on a platform E, which could be turned for facility of observation, as shown in the dotted lines D’ and FE’, Thus the ants had a considerable range, as they could wander as far as the water ditch. The object of having the platform C C larger than the supports of the nests B 2 4 ARTIFICIAL NESTS. was that if the ants fell, as often happened, they were within the water boundary, and were able to return home. This plan answered fairly well, and saved space, but it did not quite fulfil my hopes, as the ants were 80 pugnacious, that I was obliged to be very careful which nests were placed on the same stand. Of course it is impossible to force the ants into these glass nests. On the other hand, when once the right way is known, it is easy to induce them to go in. When I wished to start a new nest I dug one up, and brought home the ants, earth, &c., all together. I then put them over one of my artificial nests, on one of the platforms surrounded by a moat of water. Gra- dually the outer earth dried up, while that between the two plates of glass, being protected from evapo- ration, retained its moisture. Under these circum- stances the ants found it more suitable to their requirements, and gradually deserted the drier mould outside, which I removed by degrees. In the earth between the plates of glass the ants tunnelled out passages, chambers, &c. (fig. 2, p. 43), varying in form according to the circumstances and species. Even between the plates of glass the earth gradually dried up, and I had to supply artificial rain from time to time. Occasionally also I gave them an altogether new nest. They seem, however, to get attached to their old homes, and I kept one community in the same glass case from 1874 till 1890. It is hardly necessary to say that the individual DIFFERENCES IN HABITS. 5 ants belonging to the communities placed on the stands just described, knew their own nests perfectly well. These nests gave me special facilities for observing the internal economy of ant life. Another main diffe- rence between my observations and those of previous naturalists has consisted in the careful record of the actions of individual ants. The most convenient mode of marking the ants was, I found, by placing a small dab of paint on the back, and, in the case of bees or wasps, by snipping off a fragment at the extremity of the wing. This, I need hardly say, from the structure of the wing, gives the insect no pain;-in fact, as it is only necessary to remove a minute portion, not sufficient to make any difference in their flight, they seemed scarcely to notice it. I never found any difficulty in painting bees or wasps; if they are given a little honey they become so intent that they quietly allow the paint to be applied. Of course too much must not be put on, and care must be taken not to touch the wings or cover up the spiracles. Ants require somewhat more delicate treatment, but with a little practice they could also be marked without any real difficulty. No two species of Ants are identical in habits ; and, on various accounts, their mode of life is far from easy to unravel. In the first place, most of their time is passed underground: all the education of the young, for instance, is carried on in the dark. Again, ants are essentially gregarious; it is in some cases difficult to 6 STAGES IN THE LIFE OF ANTS—EGGS. keep a few alive by themselves in captivity, and at any rate their habits under such circumstances are entirely altered. If, on the other hand, a whole com- munity is kept, then the greater number introduces a fresh element of difficulty and complexity. Moreover, even individuals of the same species seem to differ in character, and the same individual will behave very differently under different circumstances. Al- though, then, ants have attracted the attention of many of the older naturalists,—Gould, De Geer, Reaumur, Swammerdam, Latreille, Leuwenhoeck, Huber,—and have recently been the objeet of interesting obser- vations by Frederick Smith, Belt, Moggridge, Bates, Mayr, Emery, Forel, McCook, and others, they still present one of the most promising fields for observation and experiment. The life of an ant falls into four well-marked periods—those of the egg, of the larva or grub, of the pupa or chrysalis, and of the perfect insect or imago, The eggs are white or yellowish, and somewhat elon- gated. They are hatched about fifteen days after being laid. Those observed by me have taken a month or six weeks, The larve of ants (Pl. V. fig. 3), like those of bees and wasps, are small, white, legless grubs, some: what conical in form, narrowing towards the head, They are carefully tended and fed, being carried about from chamber to chamber by the workers, probably in order to secure the most suitable amount of warmth LARVA—PUPA, 7 aud moisture. I have observed, also, that they are very often assorted according to age. It is sometimes very curious in my nests to see them arranged in groups according to size, so that they remind one of a school divided into five or six classes. As regards the length of life of the larve, Forel supposed! that those of Yapinoma matured the quickest, and were full-grown in about six or seven weeks. Some of Myrmica ruginodis, however, ob- served by me, turned into pupz in less than a month. In other cases the period is much longer. In certain species, Lasius flavus, for instance, some of the larve live through the winter. When full grown the larve turn into pupe (PI. V. fig. 4), sometimes naked, sometimes covered with a silken cocoon, constituting the so-called ‘ant-eggs.’ We do not yet understand why some larve spin cocoons, while others remain naked. As a general rule, the species which have not a sting, are enveloped in a cocoon, while those which have, are naked. Latrielle was the first to observe that in one species (Ff. fusca) the larve sometimes spin a cocoon, and sometimes remain naked. The reason for this differ- ence is still quite unknown. After remaining some days in this state they emerge as perfect insects. In many cases, however, they would perish in the attempt, if they were not assisted + and it is very pretty to see the older ants helping them to extricate them- ' Les Fourmis de la Suisse, p. 420, 8 PUPA—IMAGO. selves, carefully unfolding their legs and smoothing out the wings, with truly feminine tenderness and delicacy. Our countryman Gould long ago mentioned, and the fact has since been fully confirmed by Forel, that the pupe are unable to emerge from the cocoons without the assistance of the workers. The ants generally remain from three to four weeks in this condition. In the case of ants, as with other insects which pass through similar metamorphoses, such as bees, wasps, moths, butterflies, flies, and beetles, &c., the larval stage is the period of growth. During the chrysalis stage, though immense changes take place, and the organs of the perfect insect are more or less rapidly developed, no food is taken, and there is no addition to the size or weigat. The imago or perfect insect again takes food, but does not grow. The ant, like all the insects above named, is as large when it emerges from the pupa as it ever will be, though the abdomen of the females some- times increases in size from the development of the eggs. We have hitherto had very little information as to the length of life in ants in the imago, or perfect, state. So far, indeed, as the preparatory stages are concerned, there is little difficulty in approximately ascertaining the facts; namely, that while in summer they take only a few weeks, in some species, as our small yellow meadow ants (Lasius flavus), the autumn larve LENGTH OF LIFE. 9 remain with comparatively little change throughout the winter. It is much more difficult to ascertain the length of life of the perfect insect, on account of their gregarious habits, and the difficulty of recognising individual ants. I have found, however, as we shall presently see, that their life is much longer than has been generally supposed. It is generally stated in entomological works that the males of ants die almost immediately. No doubt this is generally the case. At the same time, some males of Myrmica ruginodis, which I isolated with their mates in August 1876, lived until the following spring ; one of them till May 17. It has also been the general opinion that the females lived about a year. Christ! indeed thought they might last three or even four seasons, but this was merely a suggestion, and Forel expressed the general opinion when he said, ‘Je suis persuadé qu’en automne il ne reste presque plus que les ouvriéres écloses pendant le courant de J’été.’ The average life of a queen is also, he thinks, not more than twelve months I have found, however, that the life of the queens and workers is much longer than had been sup- posed. I shall give further details in a subsequent chapter, but I may just mention here that I kept a queen of Formica fusca from December 1874 till August 1888, when she must have been nearly fifteen years old, and of course may have been more. She 1 Naturgeschichte der Insekten, 10 STRUCTURE OF ANTS. attained, therefore, by far the greatest age of any insect on record.' I have also some workers which I have had since 1875. The body of an ant consists of three parts: the head, thorax, and abdomen. The head bears the prin- cipal organs of sense, and contains the brain, as the anterior portion of the nervous system may fairly be called. The thorax, supporting the legs and, when they are present, the wings, contains the principal muscles of locomotion. The abdomen contains the stomach and intestines, the organs of reproduction, the sting, &e. Returning to the head: the antennz consist of a short spherical basal piece, a long shaft, known as the scape, and a flagellum of from six to seventeen (gene- rally, however, from ten to thirteen) short segments, the apical ones sometimes forming a sort of club. The number of segments is generally different in the males and females. The eyes are of two kinds. Large compound eyes, one on each side of the head ; and ocelli, or so-called simple eyes. The compound eyes consist of many facets. The number differs greatly in different species, and in the different sexes, the males generally having the greatest number. Thus, in Formica pratensis there are, according to Forel, in the males about 1,200 in each eye, in the fertile females between 800 and 900, in the workers about 600. Where the workers vary in size 1 Having reference to the facts stated on page 37 this is a result of great physiological interest. THE HEAD. li they differ also in the number of facets. Thus, again following the same authority, the large workers of Camponotus ligniperdus have 500, the smaller ones only 450; while in the Harvesting ant (Atta barbara) the contrast is even greater, the large specimens having 230, the small ones only from 80 to 90. The ordinary workers have in Polyergus rufescens about 400; in Lasius fuliginosus, 200; in Tapinoma erra- ticum, 100; in Plagiolepis pygmea, 70 to 80; in Lasius flavus, about 80; in Bothriomyrmex meri- dionalis, 55; in Strongylognathus testaceus, Stenamma Westwoodti, and Tetramorium cespitum, about 45 ; in Pheidole pallidula, about 30; Myrmecina La- treillei, 15; Solenopsis fugax, 6 to 9; while in Ponera contracta there are only from 1 to 5; in Hciton only 1; and in 7'yphlopone the eyes are altogether wanting. The number of facets seems to increase rather with the size of the insect than with the power of vision. The ocelli are never more than three in number, disposed in a triangle with the apex in front Some- times the anterior ocellus alone is present. In some species the workers are altogether without ocelli, which, however, are always present in the queens and in the males. The mouth parts are the labrum, or upper lip; the first pair of jaws or mandibles ; the second pair of jaws or maxille, which are provided with a pair of palpi, or feelers; and the lower lip, or labium, also bearing a pair of palpi. 12 THE THORAX. The thorax is generally considered to consist, as ia other insects, of three divisions—the prothorax, meso- thorax, and metathorax. [ have elsewhere, however, given reasons into which I will not at this moment enter, for considering that the first abdominal segment has in this group coalesced with the thorax. The thorax bears three pairs of legs, consisting of a coxa, trochanter, femur, tibia and tarsus, the latter composed of five segments and terminating in a pair of strong claws. In the males and females the meso- and meta- thorax each bear a pair of wings, which, however, in the case of the female, are stripped off by the insects themselves soon after the marriage flight. The workers never possess wings, nor do they show even a rudimentary representative of these organs. Dr, Dewitz has, however, pointed out that the full-grown larvee of the workers possess well-developed ‘ imaginal disks,’ like those which, in the males and females, de- velope into the wings. These disks, during the pupal life, gradually become atrophied, until in the perfect insects they are represented only by two strongly chitinised points lying under the large middle thoracic spiracles. No one unacquainted with the original history of these points would ever suspect them to be the rudimentary remnants of ancestral wings.! The thorax also bears three pairs of spiracles, or breathing holes. » Zeit. f. wiss. Zool., vol. xxviii. p. 555, THE ABDOMEN. 13 The abdomen consists of six segments, in the queens and workers, that is to say in the females, and seven in the males. In the Formicide the first segment, as a general rule, forms a sort of peduncle (known as the scale or knot) between the metathorax and the remainder of the abdomen. In the Myrmicidse two segments are thus detached from the rest. The Poneride form, as regards the peduncle, and in some other respects, an intermediate group between the Formicide and the Myrmicide. The second abdo- minal segment is contracted posteriorly, but not so much so as to form a distinct knot. The form of the knot offers in many cases valuable specific characters I am disposed to correlate the existence of a second knot among the Myrmicide with their power of stinging, which is wanting in the Formicide. Though the principal mobility of the abdomen is given in the former, as in the latter, by the joint between the metathorax and the knot, still the second segment of the peduncle must increase the flexibility, which would seem to be a special advantage to those species which have a sting. It has indeed been said that Gécophylla has a sting, while it bas only a single knot. Forel, however, has shown that the sting of G&cophylla is really rudimen- tary. It affords, therefore, no argument against my suggestion. 14 THE STING. The knot is provided with a pair of spiracles, which are situated, as Forel states, in the front of tke segment, and not behind, as supposed by Latreille. In most entomological works it is stated that the Myrmicide have a sting, and that, on the contrary, the Formicidee do not possess one. The latter family, indeed, possess a rudimentary structure representing the sting, but it seems merely to serve as a support for the poison duct. Dr. Dewitz, who has recently pub- lished! an interesting memoir on the subject, denies that the sting in Formicide is a reduced organ, and considers it rather as in an undeveloped condition. The ancestors of our existing Ants, in his opinion, had a large poison apparatus, with a chitinous support like that now present in Formica, from which the formidable weapons of the bees, wasps, and Myrmicidée have been gradually developed. I confess that I am rather disposed, on the contrary, to regard the con- dition of the organ in Formica as a case of retrogres- sion contingent upon disuse.? I find it difficult to suppose that organs—so complex, and yet so similar— as the stings of ants, bees, and wasps, should have been developed independently. Any opinion expressed by M. Dewitz on such a subject is, of course, entitled to much weight; never- theless there are some general considerations which seem to me conclusive against his view. If the sting 1 Zeit. f. wiss. Zool., vol. xxviii. p, 527. 2 This view has subsequently been adopted by Dr. Beyer, Jena Zeit. 1890. ORIGIN OF THE STING, 16 of Formica represents a hitherto undeveloped organ, then the original ant.was stingless, and the present stings of ants have an origin independent of that belonging to the other aculeate Hymenoptera, such as bees and wasps. These organs, however, are so complex, and at the same time so similarly constituted, that they must surely have a common origin. Whether the present sting is derived from a leaf-cutting instru- ment, such as that from which the sawfly takes its name, I will at present express no opinion. Dr. Dewitz him- self regards the rudimentary traces of wings in the larve of ants as the remnants of once highly-developed organs ; why, then, should he adopt the opposite view with reference to the rudimentary sting? On the whole, I must regard the ancestral ant as having pos- sessed a sting, and consider that the rudimentary con- dition of that of Formica is due to atrophy, perhaps through disuse. On the other hand, it is certainly, at first sight, diffi- cult to understand why ants, having once acquired a sting, should allow it to fall into desuetude. There are, however, some considerations which may throw a certain light on the subject. The poison glands are much larger in Formica than in Myrmica. Moreover, some species have the power of ejecting their poison to a consider- able distance. In Switzerland, after disturbing a nest of Formica rufa, or some nearly allied species, I have found that a hand held as much as 18 inches above the ants was covered with acid. But even when the poison 16 THE POISON OF ANTS. is not thus fired at the enemy from a distance, there are two cases in which the sting might be allowed to fall into disuse. Firstly, those species which fight with their mandibles might find it on the whole most convenient to inject the poison (as they do) into the wounds thus created. Secondly, if the poison itself is 30 intensified in virulence as to act through the skin, a piercing instrument would be of comparatively small advantage. I was amused one day by watching some specimens of the little Cremastogaster sordidula and the much larger Formica cinerea. The former were feeding on some drops of honey, which the Formicas were anxious to share, but the moment one approached, the little Cremastogasters simply threatened them with the tip of their abdomen, and the Formicas immediately beat a hasty retreat. In this case the comparatively large Formica could certainly have had nothing to fear from physical violence on the part of the little Cremastogaster. Mere contact with the poison, however, appeared to cause them considerable pain, and generally the threat alone was sufficient to cause a retreat. However this may be, in their modes of fighting, different species of ants have their several peculiarities. Some also are much less military than others. Myr- mecina Latreillii, for instance, never attack, and scarcely even defend themselves. Their skin is very hard, and they roll themselves into a ball, not defend- ing themselves even if their nest is invaded ; to pre- MODES OF FIGHTING. Li vent which they make the entrances small, and often station at each a worker, who uses her head to stop the way. The smell of this species is also, perhaps, a protection. Tetramorium cespitum has the habit of feigning death. This species, however, does not roli itself up, but merely applies its legs and antenne closely to the body. Formica rufa, the common Horse ant, attacks in serried masses, seldom sending out detachments, while single ants scarcely ever make individual attacks. They rarely pursue a flying foe, but give no quarter, killing as many enemies as possible, and never hesi- tating, with this object, to sacrifice themselves for the common good. Formica sanguinea, on the contrary, at least in their slave-making expeditions, attempt rather to terrify than to kill. Indeed, when invading a nest, they do not attack the flying inhabitants unless these are attempting to carry off pup, in which case the F. sanguineas force them to abandon the pup. When fighting, they attempt to crush their enemies with their mandibles. Formica exsecta is a delicate, but very active species. They also advance in serried masses, but in close quarters they bite right and left, dancing about to avoid being bitten themselves. When fighting with larger species they spring on to their backs, and then seize them by the neck or by an antenna. They also have the instinct of acting together, three o 18 DIFFERENT CLASSES OF INDIVIDUALS. or four seizing an enemy at once, and then pulling different ways, so that she on her part cannot get at any one of her foes. One of them then jumps on her back and cuts, or rather saws, off her head. In battles between this ant and the much larger F. pra- tensis, many of the F. exsectas may be seen on the backs of the F. pratensis, sawing off their heads from behind. The species of Zasiws make up in numbers what they want in strength. Several of them seize an enemy at once, one by each of her legs or antenna, and when they have once taken hold they will suffer themselves to be cut in pieces rather than leave go. Polyergus rufescens, the celebrated slave-making o: Amazon ant, has a mode of combat almost peculiar to herself. The jaws are very powerful, and pointed. If attacked—if, for instance, another ant seizes her by a leg—she at once takes her enemy’s head into her jaws, which generally makes her quit her hold. If she does not, the Polyergus closes her mandibles, so that the points pierce the brain of her enemy, paralysing the nervous system. The victim falls in convulsions, setting free her terrible foe. In this manner a com- paratively small force of Polyergus will fearlessly attack much larger armies of other species, and sufler themselves scarcely any loss. Under ordinary circumstances an ants’ nest, like a beehive, consists of three kinds of individuals: workers, or imperfect females (which constitute the THE HONEY ANT. 9) great majority), males, and perfect females. There are, however, often several queens in an ants’ nest; while, as we all know, there is never more than one queen mother ina hive. The queens of ants are pro- vided with wings, but after a single flight they tear them off, and do not again quit the nest. In ad- dition to the ordinary workers there is in some species a second, or rather a third, form of female. In almost any ants’ nest we may see that the workers differ more or less in size. The amount of difference, however, depends upon the species. In Lasius niger, the small brown garden ant, the workers are, for instance, much more uniform than in the little yellow meadow ant, or in Atta barbara (PI. II. figs. 1 and 2), where some of them are much more than twice as large as others. But in certain ants there are differences still more re- markable. Thus, ina Mexican species, Myrmecocystus,' besides the common workers, which have the form of ordinary neuter ants, there are certain others in which the abdomen is swollen into an immense sub-diapha- nous sphere. These individuals are very inactive, and serve principally as living honey-jars. I have described in a subsequent page a species of Camponotus (Pl. IV. fig. i) from Australia, which presents us with the same remarkable phenomenon. In the genus Pheidole (Pl. II. figs. 3 and 4), very common in southern Europe, there are also two distinct forms without any interme- diate gradations; one with heads of the usual propor- ' Wesmael, Bull. Acad. Roy. Brueelles, vol. v. p. 771. o 3 20 WORKERS—-SOLDIERS. tion, and a second with immense heads provided with very large jaws. This differentiation of certain indi- viduals so as to adapt them to special functions seems to me very remarkable; for it must be remembered that the difference is not one of age or sex. The large- headed individuals are generally supposed to act as soldiers, and the size of the head enables the muscles which move the jaws to be of unusual dimensions}; but the little workers are also very pugnacious. Indeed, in some nests of Pheidola megacephala, which I had for some time under observation, the small workers were quite as ready to fight as the large ones. Again, in the genus Colobopsis Emery discovered that two ants, then supposed to be different species, and known as Colobopsis truncata and C. fuscipes, are really only twe forms of one species. In this case the entrance to the nest is guarded by the large-headed form, which may therefore fairly be called a soldier. Savage observed among the Driver Ants, where also there are two kinds of workers, that the large ones arranged themselves on each side of the column formed by the small ones. They acted, he says, evidently the part of guides rather than of guards. At times they place ‘their abdomen horizontally on the ground, and laying hold of fixed points with their hind feet (which together thus acted as a fulcrum), elevate the anterior portion of their bodies to the highest point, open wide their jaws, and stretch forth their antennz, which for the most part were fixed, as if in the act of listening FIVE KINDS OF INDIVIDUALS IN SAUBA. 21 and watching for approaching danger. They would occasionally drop their bodies to the ground again, run off to one side, and fiercely work their jaws and antenna, as if having detected some strange sounds in the dis- tance. Discerning nothing, they would quickly return to their posts and resume their positions, thus acting as scouts,’! The same thing has been noticed by other natu- ralists. Bates, for instance, states that in the marching columns of Heciton drepanophora the large-headed workers ‘all trotted along empty-handed and outside the column, at pretty regular intervals from each other, like subaltern officers in a marching regiment. on did not see them change their position, or take any notice of their small-headed comrades ;’ and he says that if the column was disturbed they appeared less pugnacious than the others. In other species, however, of the same genus, Eciton vastator and E. erratica, which also have two distinct kinds of workers, the ones with large heads do appear to act mainly as soldiers. When a breach is made in one of their covered ways, the small workers set to work to repair the damage, while the large-headed ones issue forth in a menacing manner, rearing themselves up and threatening with their jaws. In the Sauba Ant of South America (@codoma cephalotes), the complexity is carried still further; 1 Rev. T. S. Savage on the ‘Habits of the Driver Ants,’ Zrans Ent. Soo. vol. v. p. 12. 22 ORIGIN OF THE SOLDIERS. Lund! pointed out that there were two different kinds of workers, but Bates has since shown that there are in this species no less than five classes of individuals, namely: 1. Males. 2. Queens. 3. Small ordinary workers (Pl. III. fig. 2). 4. Large workers (Pl. III. fig. 1), with very large hairy heads. 5. Large workers, with large polished heads. Bates never saw either of these two last kinds do any work at all, and was not able to satisfy himself as to their functions. They have also been called soldiers, but this is obviously a misnomer—at least, they are said never to fight. Bates suggests? that they may ‘serve, in some sort, as passive instruments of protection to the real workers. Their enormously large, hard, and indestructible heads may be of use in protecting them against the attacks of insectivorous animals. They would be, on this view, a kind of pieces de resistance, serving as a foil against onslaughts made on the main body of workers.’ This does not, I confess, appear to me a probable explanation of the fact, and on the whole it seems that the true function of these large-headed forms is not yet satisfactorily explained. The question then arises whether these different kinds of workers are produced from different eggs. I am disposed to concur with Westwood in the opinion’ ‘that the inhabitants of the nest have the instinct so to modify the circumstances producing this 1 Ann. des Sci. Nat. 1831, p. 122. 2 Loc. cit., p. 31. ® Modern Classification of Tnsects, vol. ii. p, 225 DIVISION OF LABOUR. 23 state of imperfection, that some neuters shall exhibit characters at variance with those of the common kind.’ This, indeed, credits them with a very remarkable instinct, and yet I see no more probable mode of ac- counting for the facts. Moreover, the exact mode by which the differences are produced is still entirely unknown. M. Forel, in his excellent work on ants, has pointed out that very young ants devote themselves at first to the care of the larve and pupa, and that they take no share in the defence of the nest or other out-of-door work until they are some days old. This seems natural, because at first their skin is comparatively soft; and it would clearly be undesirable for them to undertake rough work or run into danger until their armour had had time to harden. There are, however, reasons for think- ing that the division of labour is carried still further. I do not allude merely to those cases in which there are completely different kinds of workers, but even to the ordinary workers. In JL. flavus, for instance, it seems probable that the duties of the small workers are somewhat different from those of the large ones, though no such division of labour has yet been detected. I shall have to record some further observations point- ing in the same direction. The nests of ants may be divided into several classes. Some species, such as our common Horse ant (Formica rufa), collect large quantities of materials, such as bits of stick, fir leaves, &c., which they heap 24 HABITATIONS OF ANTS. up into conical masses. Some construct their nests of earth, the cells being partly above, partly below, the natural level. Some are entirely underground, others eat into the trunks of old trees. In warmer climates the variations are still more numerous. Formica bispynosa, of Cayenne, forms its nest of the cottony matter from the capsules of Bombax. Sykes has described! a species of Myrmica which builds in trees and shrubs, the nest consisting of thin leaves of cow-dung, arranged like tiles on the roof of a house; the upper leaf, however, covering the whole. In some cases the nests are very extensive. Bates mentions that while he was at Par&é an attempt was made to destroy a nest of the Sauba ants by blowing into it the fumes of sulphur, and he saw the smoke issue from a great number of holes, some of them not less than seventy yards apart. A community of ants must not be confused with an ant hill in the ordinary sense. Very often indeed a community has only one dwelling, and in most species seldom more than three or four. Some, however, form numerous colonies. M. Forel even found a case in which one nest of F. ewsecta had no less than two hundred colonies, and occupied a circular space with a radius of nearly two hundred yards. Within this area they had exterminated all the other ants, except a few nests of Tapinoma erraticum, which survived, thanks to their great agility. In these cases the number of 1 Frama. Ent. Soe., vol. i. COMMUNITIES OF ANTS. 25 ants thus associated together must have been euor- mous. Even in single nests Forel estimates the numbers at from five thousand to half a million. Ants also make for themselves roads. These are ‘not merely worn by the continued passage of the ants, as has been supposed, but are actually prepared by the ants, rather however by the removal of obstacles, than by any actual construction, which would indeed not be necessary, the weights to be carried being so small. In some cases these roadways are arched over with earth, so as to form covered ways. In others, the ants excavate regular subterranean tunnels, sometimes of considerable length. The Rev. Hamlet Clark even assures us that he observed one in South America, which passed under the river Parahyba at a place where it was as broad as the Thames at London Bridge. I confess, however, that I have my doubts as to this case, for I do not understand how the continuity of the tunne! was ascertained. The food of ants consists of insects, great numbers of which they destroy; of honey, honeydew, and fruit : indeed, scarcely any animal or sweet substance comes amiss to them. Some species, such, for instance, as the small brown garden ant (Lasius niger, Pl. I. fig. 1), ascend bushes in search of aphides. The ant then taps the aphis gently with her antenne, and the aphis emits a drop of sweet fluid, which the ant drinks. Some- times the ants even build covered ways up to and over the aphides, which, moreover, they protect from the 26 FOOD—ENEMIES, attacks of other insects, Our English ants do not store up provision for the winter; indeed, their food is not of a nature which would admit of this. I have indeed observed that the small brown ant sometimes carries seeds of the violet into its nest, but for what purpose is not clear. Some of the southern ants, however, lay up stores of grain (see Chapter III.). Ants have many enemies. They themselves, and still more their young, are a favourite food of many animals. They are attacked also by numerous para- sites. Ifa nest of the brown ants is disturbed at any time during the summer, some small flies may probably be seen hovering over the nest, and every now and then making a dash at some particular ant. These flies belong to the genus Phora, and toa species hitherto unnamed, which Mr. Verrall has been good enough to describe for me (see Appendix). They lay their eggs on the ants, inside which the larve live. Other species of the genus are in the same way parasitic on bees. Ants are also sometimes attacked by mites. On one occasion I observed that one of my ants had a mite attached to the underside of its head. The mite, which maintained itself for more than three months in the same position, was almost as large as the head The ant could not remove it herself. Being a queen, she did not come out of the nest, se that I could not do it for her, and none of her own companions thought of performing this kind office. In character the different species of ants differ very CHARACTER—INDUSTRY. 27 much from one another. JF. fusca (Pl. I. fig. 3), the one which is pre-eminently the ‘slave’ ant, is, as might be expected, extremely timid ; while the nearly allied F. cinerea has, on the contrary, a considerable amount of individual audacity. F. rufa (Pl. II. fig. 5), the horse ant, is, according to M. Forel, especially characterised by the want of individual initiative, and always moves in troops; he also regards the genus Formica as the most brilliant; though others excel it in other respects, as, for instance, in the sharpness of their senses. . pratensis worries its slain enemies; F. sanguinea (Pl. I. fig. 6) never does so. The slave-making ant (P. rufescens, Pl. I. fig. 5) is, perhaps, the bravest of all. If a single indi- vidual finds herself surrounded by enemies, she never attempts to fly, as any other ant would, but transfixes ker opponents one after another, springing right and left with great agility, till at length she succumbs, overpowered by numbers. M. scabrinodis is cowardly and thievish; during wars among the larger species they haunt the battle-fields and devour the dead. Tetramorium is said to be very greedy; Myrmecina very phlegmatic. In industry ants are not surpassed even by bees and wasps. They work all day, and in warm weather, if need be, even at night too. I once watched an ant from six in the morning, and she worked without intermission till a quarter to ten at night. I had put her to a saucer containing larve, and in this time she 28 GAMES. carried off no less than a hundred and eighty-seven to the nest. I kept another ant, which I employed in my experiments, under continuous observation several days. When I started for London in the morning, and again when I went to bed at night, I used to put her ina small bottle, but the moment she was let out she began to work again. On one occasion I was away from home for a week. On my return I took her out of the bottle, placing her on a little heap of larvee about three feet from the nest. Under these circum- stances I certainly did not expect her to return. How- ever, though she had thus been six days in confine- ment, the brave little creature immediately picked up a larva, carried it off to the nest, and after half an hour’s rest returned for another. Our countryman Gould noticed! certain ‘ amuse- ments’ or ‘ sportive exercises,’ which he had observed among ants. Huber also mentions? scenes which he had witnessed on the surface of ant hills, and which, he says, ‘I dare not qualify with the title gymnastic, although they bear a close resemblance to scenes of that kind.’ The ants raised themselves on their hind legs, caressed one another with their antennz, engaged in mock combats, and almost seemed to be playing hide and seek. Forel entirely confirms Huber’s state- ments, though he was at first incredulous. He says ; 3— 1 An Account of English Ants, p. 103. 2 Nat. Hist. of Ants, p. i97. * Loe. cit., p. 367. CLEANLINESS, 29 ‘Malgré exactitude avec laquelle il décrit ce fait, Javais peine 4 y croire avant de l’avoir vu moi-méme, mais une fourmiliére pratensis m’en donna l’exemple a plusieurs reprises lorsque je l’approchai avec précaution. Des 8 (2.e. workers) se saisissaient par les pattes ou par les mandibules, se roulaient par terre, puis se retachaient, s’entrainaient les unes les autres dans les trous de leur déme pour en ressortir aussit6t aprés, etc. Tout cela sans aucun acharnement, sans venin ; il était évident que c’était purement amical. Le moindre soufile de ma part mettait aussitot fin & ces jeux J’avoue que ce fait peut paraitre imaginaire 4 qui ne Pa pas vu, quand on pense que l’attrait des sexes ne peut en étre cause.’ Bates, also, in the case of Eciton legionis, observed behaviour which looked to him ‘ like simple indulgence in idle amusement, the conclusion,’ he says, ‘ that the ants were engaged merely in play was irresistible.”! Lastly, I may observe that ants are very cleanly animals, and assist one another in this respect. I have often seen them licking one another. Those, moreover, which I painted for facility of recognition were gradu- ally cleaned by their friends. t Loo, cit. vol. ii p. BAZ 30 CHAPTER IL ON THE FURMATION AND MAINTENANCE OF NESTS, AND ON THE DIVISION OF LABOUR. It is remarkable that notwithstanding the researches of so many excellent observers, and though ants’ nests swarm in every field and every wood, we did not know how their nests commence. Three principal modes have been suggested. After the marriage-flight the young queen may either— 1. Join her own or some other old nest ; 2. Associate herself with a certain number of workers, and with their assistance commence a new nest ; or 3. Found a new nest by herself. The question can of course only be settled by obs servation, and the experiments made to determine it had hitherto been indecisive. Blanchard, indeed, in his work on the ‘ Metamor- phoses of Insects’ (£ quote from Dr. Duncan’s transla- tion, p. 205), says :—* Huber observed a solitary female go down into a small under-ground hole, take off her own wings, and become, as it were, a worker; then she constructed a small ‘nest, laid a few eggs, and brought ORIGIN OF AN ANTS’ NEST. 31 up the larve by acting as mother and nurse at the same time. This, however, is not a correct version of what Huber says. His words are :—‘ I enclosed several females in a vessel full of light humid earth, with which they constructed lodges, where they resided, some singly, othersincommon. They laid their eggs and took great care of them; and notwithstanding the inconvenience of not being able to vary the temperature of their habi- tation, they reared some, which became larve of a tolerable size, but which soon perished from the effect of my own negligence.’ ! It will be observed that it was the eggs, not the larvee, which, according to Huber, these isolated females reared. It is true that he attributes the early and uni- form death of the larve to his own negligence, but the fact remains that in none of his observations did an isolated female bring her offspring to maturity. Other entomologists, especially Forel and Ebrard, have repeated the same observations with similar results; and as yet in no single case had an isolated female been known to bring her young to maturity. Forel even thought himself justified in concluding, from his ob- servations and from those of Ebrard, that such a fact could not occur. Lepeletier de St. Fargeau? was of opinion that ants’ nests originate in the second mode indicated above, and 1 Natural History of Ants, Huber, p. 121. ® Hist. Nat. des Ins. Hyménoptéres, vol. i. p. 143. 32 RELUCTANCE TO ADOPT A NEW QUEEN. it is, indeed, far from improbable that this may occur. No clear case has, however, yet been observed. M. de St. Fargeau himself observes! that ‘les particularités qui accompagnent la formation premiére d’une four- miliére sont encore incertaines et mériteraient d’étre observées avec soin.’ Under these circumstances I made the following experiments :— la. I took an old, fertile, queen from a nest of Lasius flavus, and put her to another nest of the same species. The workers became very excited and attacked her. b. I repeated the experiment, with the same result. c. Do. do. In this case the nest to which the queen was transferred was without a queen; still they would not receive her. dande. Do. do. do. I conclude, then, that, at any rate in the case of L. flavus, the workers will not adopt an old queen from another nest. The following observation shows that, at any rate in some cases, isolated queen ants are capable of giving origin to a new community. On August 14, 1876, I isolated two pairs of Myr- mica ruginodis which I found flyingin my garden. I placed them with damp earth, food, and water, and they continued perfectly healthy through the winter. 1 Hist. Nat. des Ins. Hyménopteres, vol. i. p. 144. ORIGIN OF A NEST OF MYRMICA, 33 In April one of the males died, and the second in the middle of May. The first eggs were laid between April 12 and 23. They began to hatch the first week in June, and the first larva turned into a chrysalis on the 27th; asecond on the 30th; a third on July 1, when there were also seven larve and two eggs. On the 8th there was another egg. On July 8 a fourth larva had turned into a pupa. On July 11 I found there were six eggs, and on the 14th about ten. On the 15th one of the pup began to turn brown, and the eggs were about 15 in number. On the 16th a second pupa began to turn brown. On the 2Ista fifth larva had turned into a puya, and there were about 20 eggs On July 22 the first worker emerged, and a sixth larva had changed. On the 25th I observed the young worker carrying the larve about when I looked into the nest ; a second worker was coming out. On July 28 a third worker emerged, and a fourth on Aug 5 The eggs appeared to be less numerous, and some had probably been devoured. This experiment shows that the queens of Myrmica ruginodis have the instinct of bringing up larve and the power of founding communities. The workers remained about six weeks in the egg,a month in the state of larvee, and twenty-five to twenty-seven days as pupe. Since, however, cases are on record in which com- munities are known to have existed for many years, it seems clear that fresh queens must be sometimes adopted. I have indeed recorded several experiments D 34 ADOPTION OF A QUEEN. in which fertile queens introduced into queenless nests were ruthlessly attacked, and subsequent experiments have always had the same result. Mr. Jenner Fust, however, suggested to me to introduce the queen into the nest, as is done with bees, in a wire cage, and leave her there for two or three days, so that the workers might, as it were, get accustomed toher. Accordingly I procured a queen of /. fusca and put her with some honey in a queenless nest, enclosed in a wire cage 50 that the ants could not get at her. After three days I let her out, but she was at once attacked. Perhaps I ought to have waited a few days longer. On the con- trary, Mr. McCook reports a case of the adoption of a fertile queen of Cremastogaster lineolata by a colony of the same species:'—‘*The queen,’ he says, ‘ was taken April 16, and on May 14 following was introduced to workers of a nest taken the same day. The queen was alone within an artificial glass formicary, and several workers were introduced. One of these soon found the queen, exhibited much excitement but no hostility, and immediately ran to her sister workers, all of whom were presently clustered upon the queen. As other workers were gradually introduced they joined their comrades, until the body of the queen (who is much larger than the workers) was nearly covered with them. They appeared to be holding on by their man- dibles to the delicate hairs upon the female’s body, and 1 Proc. Acad. Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1879. ‘* Note on the Adoption of an Ant-Queen,’ by Mr. McCook, p. 139 FERTILE WORKERS. 35 continually m»ved their antenne caressingly. This sort of attention continued until the queen, escorted by workers, disappeared in one of the galleries. She was entirely adopted, and thereafter was often seen moving freely, or attended by guards, about the nest, at times engaged in attending the larve and pup which had been introduced with the workers of the strange colony. The workers were fresh from their own natural home, and the queen had been in an artificial home for a month.’ In no case, however, when I have put a queen into one of my nests has she been accepted. Possibly the reason for the difference may be that the ants on which I experimented had been long living in arepublic; for, I am informed, that if bees have been long without a queen it is impossible to induce them te accept another. Moreover, I have found that when I put a queen with a few ants from a strange nest they did not attack her, and by adding others gradually, I succeeded in securing the throne for her. It is generally stated that among ants the queens only lay eggs. This, however, is not correct. Denny! and Lespés? have shown that the workers also are capable of producing eggs; but the latter as- serted that these eggs never come to maturity. Forel, however, has proved? that this is not the case, but » Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., 2nd ser., vol. i. 2 Ann. des Sci. Nat., 1863. = Fourmis de la Suisse, p, 329. n2 36 EGGS LAID BY FERTILE WORKERS that in some cases, at any rate, the eggs do produce young. Dewitz even maintains! that the workers habitually lay eggs, and explains the difference which on this view exists between the workers of ants and those of bees, on the ground that (as he supposes) the majority of ants die in the autumn, so that the eggs laid by the queens alone would not be sufficient to stock the nest in the spring; while among bees the majority survive the winter, and consequently the eggs laid by the queen are sufficient to maintain the num- bers of the community. In reply to this argument, it may be observed that among wasps the workers all perish in the autumn, while, on the contrary, among ants I have proved that, at least as regards many species, this is not the case. Moreover, although eggs are frequently laid by workers, this is not so often the case as Dewitz appears to suppose. Forel appears to have only observed it in one or two cases. In my nests the instances were more numerous; and, indeed, I should say that in most nests there were a few fertile workers. Among bees and wasps also the workers are occa- sionally fertile ; but, so far as our observations go, it is a curious fact that their eggs never produce females, either queens or workers, but always males. The four or five specimens bred by Forel from the eggs of workers were, moreover, all males. It became therefore an interesting question whether | Zeit, f. miss, Zool., ol, xxviii. p. 636. ALWAYS PRODUCE MALES. 37 the same is the rule among ants; and my nests have supplied me with some facts bearing on the question. Most of my nests contained queens; and in these it would be impossible, or at least very difficult, to dis- tinguish and follow the comparatively few eggs laid by the workers. Some of my nests, however, con- tained no queen; and in them therefore all the eggs must have been laid by workers. One of these was a nest of Formica cinerea, which I brought back from Castellamare in November 1875. At that time it contained no eggs or larve. In 1876 a few eggs were laid, of which fifteen came to maturity, and were, I believe, all males. In 1877 there were fourteen pupe, of which twelve came to maturity, and were all males. Again, in a nest of Lasius niger, kept in captivity since July 1875, there were in 1876 about 100 young ; and these were, as far as I could ascertain, all males. At any rate there were about 100 males, and I could not find a single young female. In 1877 there were again some pupx; but owing to an accident none of them came to maturity. In 1878 fifteen came to maturity ; and fourteen were males. The other I could not find after it left the pupa skin; but I have no doubt, from the appearance of the pupa, that it was also a male. Another nest of Lasius niger, taken in November 1875, brought in 1878 only one young ant to maturity ; and this was a male. 38 EGGS LAID BY FERTILE WORKERS Again, in a nest of Formica fusca, taken in 1875, though in 1876 and 1877 eggs were laid and a few arrived at the pupa-state, none came to maturity. They were all, however, either males or queens, and, I have little doubt, were males. In 1878 one came to maturity, and it was a male. A nest of F. fusca, captured in 1876, did not bring up any young in 1877. In 1878 three larvae came to maturity; and they all proved to be males. Another nest of F. fusca, captured in 1877, in 1878 brought only one young one to maturity. This was a male. In the following year (1879), I again carefully watched my nests, to see what further light they would throw on the subject. In six of those which contained no queen, eggs were produced, which of course must necessarily have been laid by workers. The first of these, the nest of Lasius niger, which I have watched since July 1875, and which, therefore, is interesting from the great age of the workers, about ten larvee were hatched, but only four reached the pupa state. Of these one disappeared ; the other three I secured, and on examination they all proved to be males. The nest of Lasius niger, which has been under observation since November 1875, pro- duced about ten pups. Of these I examined seven, all of which I found to be males. The others escaped me. I believe that, having died, they were brought out and thrown away. ALWAYS PRODUCE MALES. 39 The nest of Formica cinerea, captured at the same time, produced four larvee, all of which perished before airiving at the pupa stage. The larve of males and of queens are much larger than those of workers, and these larve were too big to have been those of workers. In a nest of Formica fusca, which I have had under observation since August 1876, three pups were produced. They were all males. Another nest of Formica fusca produced a single young one, which also was a male, Lastly, my nest of Polyergus rufescens, which M. Forel was so good as to send me in the spring of 1876, in 1879 produced twelve pup. Eleven of these turned out to be males. The other one I lost; and I have little doubt that it was brought out and thrown away. It was certainly not a worker. As regards the first three of these pupz, I omitted to record at the time whether they belonged to the Polyergus or to the slaves, though I have little doubt that they belonged to the former species. The last eight, at any rate, were males of Polyergus. Indeed, in all of my queenless nests, males have been produced ; and in not a single queenless nest has a worker laid eggs which have produced a female, either a queen or a worker. Perhaps I ought to add that workers are abundantly produced in those of my nests which possess a queen. While great numbers of workers and males have 40 QUEENS SELDOM PRODUCED IN CAPTIVITY. come to maturity in my nests, with one exception not a single queen has been produced. This was in a nest of Formica fusca, in which five queens came to maturity. The nest (which, I need hardly say, possessed a queen) had been under observa- tion since April 1879, and the eggs therefore must have been laid in captivity. The nest had been richly supplied with animal food, which may possibly account for the fact. It is known that bees, by difference of food, &c., possess the power of obtaining at will from the same eggs either queens or ordinary workers. Mr. Dewitz,' however, is of opinion that among ants, on the con- trary, the queens and workers are produced from different kinds of eggs. He remarks that it is very difficult to understand how the instinct, if it is to be called instinct, which would enable the working ants to make this difference can have arisen. This is no doubt true; but it seems to me quite as difficult to understand how the queens, which must have originally laid only queen eggs and male eggs, can have come to produce another class. Moreover, however great the difficulty may be to understand how the ants can have learnt to produce queens and workers from one kind of egg, the same difficulty exists almost to the same extent in bees, which, as Mr. Dewitz admits, do possess the power. Moreover, it seems to me very unlikely that the result is produced in one way in the case of 1 Zeit. fiir wiss, Zool. 1878, p. 101. ORIGIN OF QUEENS. 4] bees, and in another in that of ants. It is alsoa strong argument that in none of my nests, though thousands of workers and males have been produced, had I ever observed a queen to be so until the year 1879. On the whole, then, though I differ from so excellent a naturalist with much hesitation, I cannot but think that ants, like bees, possess the power of developing a given egg into either a queen or a worker. I have already mentioned that the previous views as to the duration of life of ants turn out to be quite erroneous. It was the general opinion that they lived for a single year. Two of my queen ants lived, the one nearly fourteen, the other nearly fifteen years, viz., from December 1874 to July 1887 and August 1888 respectively. During the whole time they enjoyed perfect health, and every year have laid eggs producing workers, a fact which suggests physiological conclusions of great interest. I have, moreover, little doubt that some of the workers now in this nest were among those originally captured, the mortality after the first few weeks having been but small. This, however, I cannot prove. A nest of F. sanguimea, which M. Forel kindly forwarded to me on September 12, 1875 (but which contained no queen), gradually diminished in numbers, untilin February 1879 it was reduced to two F. san- guineas and one slave. The latter died in February 1880. One of the two mistresses died between May 10 and May 16, 1880, and the other only survived her 42 LONGEVITY OF ANTS. a few days, dying between the 16th and 20th. These two ants, therefore, must have been five years old at least. It is certainly curious that they should, after living so long, have died within ten days of one another. There was nothing, as far as I could see, in the state of the nest or the weather to account for this, and they were well supplied with food; yet I hardly venture to suggest thut the survivor pined away for the loss of her companion. Some workers of F. cinerea lived in one of my nests from November 1875 to April 1882. Workers of F. fusca have attained the age of six years in several of my nests, and in one of Lasius niger brought in on November 30, 1875, there were no queens; and, as already mentioned, no workers have been produced. Those now living (February 1883) are therefore the original ones, and they must be more than seven years old. The duration of life in ants is therefore much greater than has been hitherto supposed. Though I lose many ants from accidents, especially in summer, in winter there are very few deaths. I have given the following figures (fig. 2 and PI. VIL), which represent a typical nest belonging to Lasius niger, because it is a good instance of the mode in which my ants excavated chambers and galleries for themselves, and seems to show some ideas of strategy. The nest is, as usual, between two plates of glass, the outer border is a framework of wood, and the shaded part ARRANGEMENT OF A NEST. 43 Fig, 2. Ground-plan of a typical nest of Zasius niger, reduced. a, narrow doorway; 0, hall; ¢, vestibule; ¢d, main chamber; e, inner sanctum ; f,f,f, 7 narrow entrance passages to sanctum ; g, 7, Spe- cial pillars. 44 ARRANGEMENT OF CHAMBERS. represents garden mould, which the ants have them- selves excavated, as shown in the figure. For the small doorway (a), indeed, I am myself responsible. I generally made the doorways of my nests narrow, so as to check evaporation and keep the nests from becoming too dry. It will be observed, however, that behind the hall (6) the entrance contracts, and is stil] further protected by a pillar of earth, which leaves on either side a narrow passage which a single ant could easily guard, or which might be quickly blocked up. Behind this is an irregular vestibule (c), contracted again behind into a narrow passage, which is followed by another, this latter opening into the main chamber (d). In this chamber several pillars of earth are left, almost as if to support the roof. Behind the main chamber is an inner sanctum divided into three cham- bers, and to which access is obtained through narrow entrances (/, /, f, /). Most of the pillars in the main chamber are irregular in outline, but two of them (g, 7) were regular ovals, and round each, for a distance about as long as the body of an ant, the glass had been most carefully cleaned. This was so marked, and the edge of the cleaned portion was so distinct, that it is impossible not to suppose that the ants must have had some object in this proceeding, though I am unable to suggest any explanation of it. Figure 2 was made in 1880. Plate VIL. shows the same nest as it was in 1887. It will be seen that the general arrangement has altered but little in the six DIVISION OF LABOUR. 45 years. In this plate are represented the ants them- selves, with their queen, and young in several stages; the larve, sorted as usual in several groups according to age, and the pupz by themselves ; and lastly two kinds of domestic animals, the little Beckia and the blind Woodlice. The insects are represented in their actual’ positions, but a little larger, in proportion to the nest, than they actually are. It will be observed that many of the ants are grouped round the queen, and all have their faces turned towards her. Plate VI. represents a fortified nest of another species. The circular camp is entered by gateways, which, however, are not visible in a view from above. I have already mentioned (ante, p. 23), that there is evidence of some division of labour among ants. Where, indeed, there are different kinds of workers, this is self-evident, but even in species where the workers are all of one type, something of the same kind appears to occur. In the autumn of 1875 I noticed an ant belonging to one of my nests of F. fusca out feeding alone. The next day the same ant was again out by herself, and for some weeks no other ant, so far as I observed, came out to the food. I did not, however, watch her with suffi- cient regularity. In the winter of 1876, therefore, I kept two nests under close observation, having arranged with my daughters and their governess, Miss Wendland (most conscientious observers), that one of us should look at them once an hour during the day. One of the 46 DIVISION OF LABOUR. nests contained about 200 individuals of F. fusca, the other was a nest of P. rufescens with the usual slaves, about 400 in number. The mistresses themselves never came out for food, leaving all this to the slaves. We began watching on November 1, but did not keep an hourly register till the 20th, after which date the results are given in the following tables (see Appendix). Table No. 1 relates to the nest of F. fusca, and the ants are denoted by numbers. The hours at which we omitted to record an observation are left blank; when no ant was at the honey, the square is marked with a0. An ant, marked in my register as No. 3, was at the time when we began observing acting as feeder to the community. The only cases in which other ants came to the honey were at 2 P.M. on November 22, when another ant came out, whom we registered as No. 4, another on the 28th, registered as No. 5. Other ants came out occasionally, but not one came to the honey (except the above mentioned) from November 28 till January 3, when another (whom we registered as No. 6) began feeding. After this a friend visited the honey once on the 4th, once on the 11th, and again on the 15th, when she was registered as No. 7. Table No. 2 is constructed in the same way, but refers to the nest of Polyergus. The feeders in this case were, at the beginning of the experiment, regis- tered as Nos. 5, 6, and 7. On November 22 a friend, registered as No. 8, came to the honey, and again on DIVISION OF LABOUR. 47 December 11; but with these two exceptions the whole of the supplies were carried in by Nos. 5 and 6, with a little help from No. 7. Thinking now it might be alleged that possibly these were merely unusually active or greedy indi- viduals, I imprisoned No. 6 when she came out to feed on the 5th. As will be seen from the table, no other ant had been out to the honey for some days; and it could therefore hardly be accidental that on that very evening another ant (then registered as No. 9) came out for food. This ant, as will be seen from the table, then took the place of No. 6, and (No. 5 being im- prisoned on January 11) took in all the supplies, again with a little help from No. 7. So matters continued till the 17th, when I imprisoned No. 9, and then again, 4.e. on the 19th, another ant (No. 10) came out for the food, aided, on and after the 22nd, by another, No. 11. This seems to me very curious. From November | to January 5, with two or three casual exceptions, the whole of the supplies were carried in by three ants, one of whom, however, did comparatively little. The other two were imprisoned, and then, but not till then, a fresh ant appears on the scene. She carried in the food for a week ; and then, she being imprisoned, two others undertook the task. On the other hand, in Nest 1, where the first foragers were not imprisoned, they continued during the whole time to carry in the necessary supplies. The facts therefore certainly seem to indicate that 48 THE HONEY ANT. certain ants are told off as foragers, and that during winter, when little food is required, two or three are sufficient to provide it. I have, indeed, no reason to suppose that in our English ants any particular individuals are specially adapted to serve as receptacles of food. In some foreign species! certain individuals in each nest serve as animated honey-pots. To them the foragers bring their supplies, and their whole duty seems to be to receive the honey, retain it, and redistribute it when required. Their abdomen becomes enormously dis- tended, the intersegmental membranes being so much extended that the chitinous segments which alone are visible externally in ordinary ants seem like small brown transverse bars. Two species presenting this remarkable peculiarity are known. The first (/yrmeco- cystus mexicanus) was described by Wesmael from specimens brought home by M. de Normann, and the account given by them has been fully confirmed by subsequent observers; as, for instance, by Lucas,? Saunders,? Edwards, Blake,® Loew,® and McCook.’ On one very important point, however, M. Wesmael was in error; he states that the abdomen of these abnormal individuals, ‘ne contient aucun organe; ou plutot, il n’est lui-méme qu’un vaste sac stomacal.’ 1 Bull. de V Acad. des Sci. de Bruxelles, vol. v. p. 771. 2 Ann. Soc. Ent. de France, v. p. 111. * Canadian Entomologist, vol. vii. p. 12. * Proc. California Academy, 1873. 5 Tbid., 1874. 8 American Nat., viii. 1874. 7 The Honey Ants, HONEY ANTS. 49 Blake even asserts that ‘the intestine of the insect is not continued beyond the thorax,’ which must surely be a misprint; and also that there is no connexion between the stomach and the intestine! These statements, however, are entirely erroneous; and, as M. Forel has shown, the abdomen does really contain the usual organs, which, however, are very easily overlooked by the side of the gigantic crop. I have therefore been much interested in receiving a second species of ant, which has been sent me by Mr. Waller, in which a similar habit has been evolved and a similar modification has been produced. The two species, however, are very distinct, belonging to totally different genera; and the former is a native of Mexico, while the one now described comes from Adelaide in Australia. The two species, therefore, cannot be de- scended one from the other; and the conclusion seems inevitable that the modification has originated inde- pendently in the two species.! It is interesting that, although these specimens apparently never leave the nest, and have little use therefore for legs, mandibles, &c., the modifications which they have undergone seem almost confined to the abdominal portion of the digestive organs. The head and thorax, antenne, jaws, legs, &ec., differ but little from those of ordinary ants. 1 I have since received another species from Australia with the same peculiarity. E CHAPTER III. ON THE RELATION OF ANTS TO PLANTS. Ir is now generally admitted that the form and colour, the scent and honey of flowers, are mainly due to the unconscious agency of insects, and especially of bees. Ants have not exercised so great an influence over the vegetable kingdom, nevertheless they have by no means been without effect. The great object of the beauty, scent, and honey of flowers, is to secure cross fertilisation; but for this purpose winged insects are almost necessary, because they fly readily from one plant to another, and gener- ally confine themselves for a certain time to the same species. Creeping insects, on the other hand, naturally would pass from one flower to another on the same plant; and as Mr. Darwin has shown, it is desirable that the pollen should be brought from a different plant altogether. Moreover, when ants quit a plant, they naturally creep up another close by, without any regard to species. Hence, even to small flowers, such as mnany crucifers, composites, saxifrages, &c., which, as far as size is concerned, might well be fertilised by ants, the visits of flying insects are much more advan- EXCLUSION OF ANTS FROM FLOWERS. 51 tageous. Moreover, if larger flowers were visited by ants, not only would they deprive the flowers of their honey without fulfilling any useful function in return, but they would probably pzevent the really useful visits of bees. If you touch an ant with a needle or a bristle, she is almost sure to seize it in her jaws; and if bees, when visiting any particular plant, were liable to have the delicate tip of their proboscis seized on by the horny jaws of an ant, we may be sure that such a species of plant would soon cease to be visited. On the other hand, we know how fond ants are of honey, and how zealously and unremittingly they search for food. How is it then that they do not anticipate the bees, and secure the honey for themselves? This is guarded against in several ways. Belt appears to have been the first naturalist to call attention to this interesting subject. ‘ Many flowers,’ he says,! ‘ have contrivances for pre- venting useless insects from obtaining access to the nectaries. ‘Great attention has of late years been paid by naturalists to the wonderful contrivances amongst flowers to secure cross fertilisation, but the struc- ture of many cannot, I believe, be understood, unless we take into consideration not only the beautiful adap- tations for securing the services of the proper insect or 1 The Naturalist in Nicaragua. By Thos. Belt, F.G.S., pp. 131 and 133. E2 52 ISOLATION BY WATER, bird, but also the contrivances for preventing insects that would not be useful from obtaining access to the nectar. Thus the immense length of the Angraecum sesquipedale of Madagascar might, perhaps, have been more easily explained by Mr. Wallace, if this impor- tant purpose had been taken into account.’ Kerner has since published a very interesting work,! especially devoted to the subject, which has been translated into English by Dr. Ogle. In aquatic plants, of course, the access of ants is precluded by the isolation in water. Nay, even many land plants have secured to themselves the same advan- tage, the leaves forming a cup round the stem. Some species have such a leaf-cup at each joint, in others there is only a single basin, formed by the rosette of radical leaves. In these receptacles rain and dew not only collect, but are retained for a considerable time. In our own country Dipsacus sylvestris (the common teazle) is the best marked instance of this mode of protection, though it is possible that these cups serve another purpose, and form, as suggested by Francis Darwin, traps in which insects are caught, and in which they are dissolved by the contained fluid, so as to serve as food for the plant. However this may be, the basins are generally found to contain water, even if no rain has fallen for some days, and must, therefore, serve to prevent the access of ants. The next mode of protection is by means of slippery ' Kerner: Flowers and thewr Unbidden Guests. SLIPPERY SURFACES. 53 surfaces. In this case, also, the leaves often form a collar round the stem, with curved surfaces over which ants cannot climb. ‘I have assured myself,’ says Kerner, ‘not only by observation, but by experiment, that wingless insects, and notably ants, find it impos- sible to mount upwards over such leaves as these. The little creatures run up the stem, and may even not unfrequently traverse the under surface of the leaves, if not too smooth; but the reflexed and slip- pery margin is more than the best climbers among them can get over, and if they attempt it they invari- ably fall to the ground. There is no necessity for the lamina of the leaf to be very broad; even narrow leaves, as, for instance, those of Gentiana verna, are enough for the purpose, supposing, of course, that the margin is bent backwards in the way described.’ Of this mode of protection the cyclamen and snow- drop offer familiar examples. In vain do ants attempt to obtain access to such flowers, the curved surfaces baffle them ; when they come to the edge they inevit- ably drop off to the ground again. In fact, these pendulous flowers protect the honey as effectually from the access of ants, as the hanging nests of the weaver and other birds protect their eggs and young from the attacks of reptiles. In a third series of plants the access of creeping insects is impeded or altogether prevented by certain parts of the flower being crowded together so as to leave either a very narrow passage or none at all. Thus 54 CLOSED FLOWERS. the Antirrhinum, or snapdragon, is completely closed, and only a somewhat powerful insect can force its way in. The flower is in fact a strong box, of which the Humble-bee only hasthe key. The Linarias are another case of this kind. The Campanulas, again, are open flowers, but the stamens are swollen at the base, and in close contact with one another, so that they form the lid of a hollow box in which the honey is secreted. In some species the same object is effec- ted by the stamens being crowded together, as in some of the white Ranunculuses of the Alps. In other cases, the flower forms a narrow tube, still further protected by the presence of hairs, sometimes scattered, sometimes, as in the white dead nettle, forming a row. In others, as in some species of Narcissus, Primula, Pedicularis, &c., the tube itself is so narrow that even an ant could not force its way down. In others, again, as in some of the Gentians, the opening of the tube is protected by the swollen head of the pistil. In others, as in clover, lotus, and many other Leguminose, the ovary and the stamens, which cling round the ovary in a closely-fitting tube, fill up almost the whole space between the petals, leaving only a very narrow tube. Lastly, in some, as in Geranium robertianum, Linum catharticwum, &e., the main tube itself is divided by ridges into several secondary ones. PROTECTION BY THICKETS OF HAIRS, 55 In still more numerous species the access of ants and other creeping insects is prevented by the presence of spines or hairs, which constitute a veritable chevaux de frise. Often these hairs are placed on the flowers themselves, as in some verbenas and gentians. Some- times the whole plant is more or less hairy, and it will be observed that the hairs of plants have a great tendency to point downwards, which of course con- stitutes them a more efficacious barrier. In another class of cases access to the flowers is prevented by viscid secretions. Everyone who has any acquaintance with botany knows how many species bear the specific name of ‘Viscosa’ or ‘ Glutinosa.’ We have, for instance, Bartsva viscosa, Robinia viscosa, Linum viscosum, Euphrasia viscosa, Silene viscosa, Dianthus viscidus, Senecio viscosus, Holostewm glu- tinosum, &c. Even those who have never opened a botanical work must have noticed how many plants are more or less sticky. Why is this? What do the plants gain by this peculiarity? The answer probably is, at any rate in most cases, that creeping insects are thus kept from the flowers. The viscid substance is found most frequently and abundantly on the peduncles im- mediately below the blossoms, or even on the blossoms themselves. In Epimedium alpinum, for instance, the leaves and lower parts of the stem are smooth, while the peduncles are covered with glandular, viscid hairs The number of small insects which are limed and perish on such plants is very considerable. Kerner 56 VISCIDITY OF PLANTS. counted sixty-four small insects on one inflorescence of Lychnis viscosa. In other species the flower is viscid ; as, for instance, in the gooseberry, Linnea borealis, Plumbago Europea, &e. Polygonum amphibiwm is a very interesting case. The small rosy flowers are richly supplied with honey; but from the structure of the flower, it would not be fertilised by creeping insects. As its name indicates, this plant grows sometimes on land, some- times in water. Those individuals, however, which grow on dry land are covered by innumerable glan- dular viscid hairs, which constitute an effectual pro- tection. On the other hand, the individuals which grow in water are protected by their situation. To them the glandular hairs would be useless, and in fact on such specimens they are not developed. In most of the cases hitherto mentioned the viscid substance is secreted by glandular hairs, but in others it is discharged by the ordinary cells of the surface. Kerner is even of opinion that the milky juice of certain plants—for instance, of some species of Lactuca (lettuce)—answers the same purpose. He _ placed several kinds of ants on these plants, and was surprised to find that their sharp claws cut through the delicate epidermis; white through the minute clefts thus made the milky juice quickly exuded, by which the ants were soon glued down. Kerner is even disposed to suggest that the nectaries which occur on certain leaves are a means of protection against the unwel- ANTS PROTECTING TREES. 57 come, because unprofitable, visits of creeping insects, by diverting them from the flowers. Thus, then, though ants have not influenced the present condition of the vegetable kingdom to the same extent as bees, yet they also have had a very considerable effect upon it in many ways. Our European ants do not strip plants of thei leaves. In the tropics, on the contrary, some species do much damage in this manner. Bates considers ' that the leaves are used ‘to thatch the domes which cover the entrances to their sub- terranean dwellings, thereby protecting them from the rains.’ Belt, on the other hand, maintains that they are torn up into minute fragments, so as to form a flocculent mass, which serves as a bed for mushrooms; the ants are, in fact, he says, ‘mushroom growers and eaters,’ ? Some trees are protected by one species of ants from others. A species of Acacia, described by Belt, bears hollow thorns, while each leaflet produces honey in a crater-formed gland at the base, as well as a small, sweet, pear-shaped body at the tip. In consequence, it is inhabited by myriads of a small ant, which nests in the hollow thorns, and thus finds meat, drink, and lodging all provided for it. These ants are continually roaming over the plant; and constitute a most efficient body- guard, not only driving off the leaf-cutting ants, but, in Belt’s opinion, rendering the leaves less liable to be 1 Loc. cit., v. i. p. 26. ? Loc. cit., p. 79. This view has since been confirmed by Schimper, Bot. Mitt. aus den Tropen. Nr. 6. 58 ; ANTS AS TREE-GUARDS eaten by herbivorous mammalia. Delpino mentions that on one occasion he was gathering a flower of Clero- dendrum fragrans, when he was himself ‘suddenly attacked by a whole army of small ants.’! Moseley has also called attention? to the relations which have grown up between ants and two ‘curious epiphytes, Myrmecodia armata and Hydnophytum formicarum. Both plants are associated in their growth with certain species of ants. As soon as the young plants developa stem, the ants gnaw at the base of this, and the irritation pruduced causes the stem to swell; the ants continuing to irritate and excavate the swelling, it assumes a globular form, and may become even larger than a man’s head. ‘The globular mass contains within a labyrinth of chambers and passages, which are occupied by the ants as their nest. The walls of these chambers and the whole mass of the inflated stem retain their vitality and thrive, continuing to increase in size with growth. From the surface of the rounded mass are given off small twigs, bearing the leaves and flowers. - It appears that this curious gall-like tumour on the stem has become a normal condition of the plants, which cannot thrive without the ants. In Myrmecodia armata the globular mass is covered with spine-like excrescences. The trees I referred to at Amboina had these curious spine-covered masses perched in every 1 Scientific Lectures, p. 33. 2 Notes by a Neturalist on the ‘Challenger’ p. 389. INSECTIVOROUS ANTS. 59 fork, and with them also smooth surfaced masses of a species of Hydnophytum.’ There are, of course, many cases in which the action of ants is very beneficial to plants. They kill off a great number of small caterpillars and other insects. Forel found in one large nest that more than twenty- eight dead insects were brought in per minute; which would give during the period of greatest energy more than 100,000 insects destroyed in a day by the inhabitants of one nest alone. Our English hunting ants generally forage alone, but in warmer countries they hunt in packs, or even troops. Ag already mentioned, none of our northern ants store up grain, and hence there has been much dis- cussion as to the well-known passage of Solomon. I have indeed observed that the small brown ants, Lasius niger, sometimes carry seeds of the violet into their nests, but for what purpose is not clear.’ It is, however, now a well-established fact that more than one species of southern auts do collect seeds of various kinds. The fact, of course, has long been known in those regions. Indeed, the quantity of grain thus stored up is some- times so considerable, that in the ‘Mischna,’ rules are laid down with reference to it; and various com- mentators, including the celebrated Maimonides, have discussed at length the question whether such grain belonged to the owner of the land, or might be taken 1 See also Appendix, p. 416. 60 HARVESTING ANTS, by gleaners—giving the latter the benefit of the doubt. He does not appear to have considered the rights of the ants. Hope! has called attention to the fact that Meer Hassan Ali, in his ‘ History of the Mussulmans,’ ex- pressly mentions this habit. ‘ More industrious little creatures,’ he says, ‘cannot exist than the small red ants, which are so abundant in India. I have watched them at their labours for hours, without tiring. They are so small, that from eight to twelve in number labour with great difficulty to convey a grain of wheat or barley, yet these are not more than half the size of a grain of English wheat. I have known them to carry one of these grains to their nest, at a distance from 600 to 1,000 yards. They travel in two distinct lines over rough or smooth ground, as it may happen, even up and down steps, at one regular pace. The returning unladen ants invariably salute the burthened ones, who are making their way to the general storehouse ; but it is done so promptly, that the line is neither broken nor their progress impeded by the salutation.’ Sykes, in his account of an Indian ant, Pheidole providens,? appears to have been the first of modern scientific authors to confirm the statements of Solomon. He states that the above-named species collects large stores of grass seeds, on which it subsists from February 1 Trans. Ent. Soc. 1840, p. 213. 2 Ibid. 1836, p. 99. Dr. Lincecum has also made a similar observation. AGRICULTURAL ANTS, 61 to October. On one occasion he even observed the ants bringing up their stores of grain to dry them after the closing thunderstorms of the monsoon; an observation which has been since confirmed by other naturalists. It is now known that harvesting ants occur in the warmer part of Europe, where their habits have been observed with care, especially by Moggridge and Lespés. It does not yet seem quite clear in what manner the ants prevent the grains from germinating. Moggridge found that if the ants were prevented from entering the granaries, the seeds began to sprout, and that this was also the case in deserted granaries. It would ap- pear therefore that the power of germination was not destroyed. On the other hand, Lespés confirms the statement long ago made by Pliny that the ants gnaw off the radicle, while Forel asserts that Atta structor allows the seeds in its granaries to commence the process of germination for the sake of the sugar. A Texan ant, Pogonomyrmesx barbatus, is also a harvesting species, storing up especially the grains of Aristida oligantha, the so-called ‘ant-rice,’ and of a grass, Buchle dactyloides. These ants clear disks, ten or twelve feet in diameter, round the entrance to their nest, a work of no small labour in the rich soil, and under the hot sun, of Texas. I say ‘clear disks,’ but some, though not all, of these disks are occupied, espe- cially round the edge, by a growth of ant rice. These 62 AGRICULTURAL ANTS, ants were first noticed by Mr. Buckley,' and their habits were some time afterwards described in more detail by Dr. Lincecum,? who maintained not only that the ground was carefully cleared of all other species of plants, but that this grass was intentionally cultivated by the ants. Mr. McCook,? by whom this subject has been recently studied, fully confirms Dr. Lincecum that the disks are kept carefully clean, that the ant rice alone is permitted to grow on them, and that the produce of this crop is carefully harvested; but he thinks that the ant rice sows itself, and is not actually cultivated by the ants. I have myself observed in Algeria, that certain species of plants are allowed by the ants to grow on their nests. ' Proc, Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1860. 2 Linnean Journal, 1861, p. 29. * The Nat. Hist. of the Agricultural Ants of Teas, Pp, $8 63 CHAPTER IV. ON THE RELATIONS OF ANTS TO OTHER ANIMALS, THE relations existing between ants and otheranimals are even more interesting than their relations with plants. As a general rule, not, however, without many remark- able exceptions, they may be said to be those of deadly hostility. Though honey is the principal food of ants, they are very fond of meat, and in their wild state destroy large numbers of other insects. Our English ants generally go out hunting alone, but many of the species living in hotter climates hunt in packs, or even in troops. Savage has given! a graphic account of the ‘ Driver’ ants (Anomma arcens, West.) of West Africa. They keep down, he says, ‘ the more rapid increase of noxious insects and smaller reptiles; consume much dead animal matter, which is constantly occurring, decaying, becoming offensive, and thus vitiating the atmosphere, and which is by no means the least important in the Torrid Zone, often compelling the inhabitants to keep 1¢On the Habits of the Driver Ants,’ Zrans. Ent. Soc. 1847, p. 14. 64 HUNTING ANTS. their dwellings, towns, and their vicinity in a state of comparative cleanliness. The dread of them is upon every living thing. : ‘Their entrance into a house is soon known by the simultaneous and universal movement of rats, mice, lizards, Blapside, Blattide, and of the numerous vermin that infest our dwellings. Not being agreed, they cannot dwell together, which modifies in a good measure the severity of the Drivers’ habits, and renders their visits sometimes (though very seldom in my view) desirable. . . : ‘They move over the house with a good degree of order, unless disturbed, occasionally spreading abroad, ransacking one point after another, till, either having found something desirable, they collect upon it, when they may be destroyed en masse by hot water. .... ‘When they are fairly in, we give up the house, and try to await with patience their pleasure, thankful, indeed, if permitted to remain within the narrow limits of our beds or chairs.’ These ants will soon destroy even the largest animal if it is confined. In one case Savage saw them kill near his house a snake four feet long. Indeed, it is said that they have been known to destroy the great python, when gorged with food and powerless. The natives even believe that the python, after crushing its victim, does not venture to swallow it, until it has made a search, and is satisfied that there are no Drivers in the vicinity! It is very remarkable that these hunting ECITONS, 65 ants are blind. They emerge, however, principally by night, and like some of the blind hunting ants of Brazil (Eciton vastator and EF. erratica), well described by Bates,' prefer to move under covered galleries, which they construct rapidly as they advance. ‘The column of foragers pushes forward step by step, under the protection of these covered passages, through the thickets, and on reaching a rotting log, or other promising hunting ground, pour into the crevices in search of booty.’ The marauding troops of Ecitons may, in some cases, be described as armies. ‘ Wherever they move,’ gays Bates,? ‘the whole animal world is set in commo- tion, and every creature tries to get out of their way. But it is especially the various tribes of wingless insects that have cause for fear, such as heavy-bodied spiders, ants of other species, maggots, caterpillars, larvee of cockroaches, and so forth, all of which live under fallen leaves or in decaying wood. The Ecitons do not mount very high on trees, and therefore the nestlings of birds are not much incommoded by them. The mode of operation of these armies, which I ascertaired, only after long-continued observation, is as follows: The main column, from four to six deep, moves forward in a given direction, clearing the ground of all animal matter dead or alive, and throwing off, here and there, a thinner column to forage for a short time on the 4 The Naturalist on the River Amazon, vol. ii. p. 364. 8 Tbid., p. 358. F 66 INSECTS MIMICKING ANTS. flanks of the main army, and re-enter it again after their task is accomplished. If some very rich place be encountered anywhere near the line of march—for example, a mass of rotten wood abounding in insect larvee, a delay takes place, and a very strong force of ants is concentrated upon it.’ Belt, also, has given! an excellent account of these Ecitons. He observed that spiders were peculiarly intelligent in escaping them, making off several yards in advance ; and not like cockroaches and other stupider insects, taking shelter in the first hiding-place, where they were almost sure to be detected. The only chance of safety was either to run right away or to stand still. He once saw a Harvestman (Phalangiwm) standing in the midst of an army of ants with the greatest circumspection and coolness, lifting its long legs one after the other. Sometimes as many as five out of the eight would be in the air at once, but it always found three or four spots free from ants, on which it could safely place its feet. On another occasion, Belt observed a green leaf-like locust, which remained per- fectly still, allowing the ants to run over it. This they did, but seem to have been quite deceived by its appearance and immobility, apparently taking it for a leaf. In other cases, insects mimic ants, and thus escape attack or are able to stalk their prey. Belt mentions a spider which in its form, colour, and movements so 1 Tre Naturalist in Nicaragua, p. 1%. ENEMIES OF ANTS. 67 much resembled an ant, that he was himself for some time deceived. Nor are ants without their enemies. We all know how fond birds are of their larvae and pupz. They have also numerous parasites. I have already alluded to the mites which are often found in ants’ nests. These are of several kinds; one of them, not uncommon in the nests of Lasius flavus, turned out to be a new species, and has been described for me by Mr. Michael (see Appendix). Certain species of Diptera, belonging to the family Phoride, are also parasitic on ants. As already men- tioned, I forwarded specimens to Mr. Verrall, who finds that some of them are a new species of the genus Phora, and that among them is also the type of a new genus, which he proposes to call Platyphora, doing me the honour of naming the species after me. I subjoin his description in the appendix. But the social and friendly relations which exist between ants and other animals are of a more complex and much more interesting character. It has long been known that ants derive a very important part of their sustenance from the sweet juice excreted by aphides. These insects, in fact, as has been over and cver again observed, are the cows of the ants; in the words of Linnzus, ‘ Aphis formicarum vacca.’ A good account of the rela- tions existing between ants and aphides was given P2 68 DOMESTIC ANIMALS OF ANTS. more than a hundred years ago by the Abbé Boisier de Sauvages.! Nor are the aphides the only insects which serve as cows to the ants. Various species of Beetles, Coccidee, Cercopis, Centrotus, Membracis, &c., are utilised in the same manner. H. Edwards? and M’Cook® have observed ants licking the larva of a butterfly, Lycena pseudargiolus.* The different species of ants utilise different species of aphis. The common brown garden ant (Lasius niger) devotes itself principally to aphides which frequent twigs and leaves; Lasiws brunneus, to the aphides which live on the bark of trees; while the little yellow ant (Lasius flavus) keeps flocks and herds of the root-feeding aphides. In fact, to this difference of habit the difference of colour is perhaps due. The Baltic amber contains among the remains of many other insects a species of ant intermediate between our small brown garden ants and the little yellow meadow ants. This is possibly the stock from which these and other allied species are descended. One is tempted to suggest that the brown species which live so much in the open air, and climb up trees and bushes, have retained and even deepened their dark colour; while others, such as Lasius flavus, 1 Observations sur Vorigine du micl, par YAbbé& Boisier de Sauvages, Juowr. de Physique, vol. i. p. 187. 2 Canadian Entomologist, January 1878. 8 The Mound-making Ants of the Alleghanies, p. 289. * See also Appendix, p. 398, APHIDES. 69 the yellow meadow ant, which lives almost entirely below ground, has become much paler. | The ants may be said almost literally to milk the aphides; for, as Darwin and others have shown, the aphides generally retain the secretion until the ants are ready to receive it. The ants stroke and caress the aphides with their antenne, and the aphides then emit the sweet secretion. As the honey of the aphides is more or less sticky, it is probably an advantage to the aphis that it should be removed. Nor is this the only service which ants render to them. They protect them from the attacks of enemies; and not unfrequently even build cowsheds of earth over them. The yellow ants collect the root- feeding species in their nests, and tend them as carefully as their own young. But this is not all. The ants not only guard the mature aphides, which are useful; but also the eggs of the aphides, which of course, until they come to maturity, are quite useless. These eggs were first observed by our countryman Gould, whose excellent little work on ants! has hardly received the attention it deserves. In this case, however, he fell into error. He states that ‘the queen ant’ [he is speaking of Lasius flavus] ‘lays three different sorts of eggs, the slave, female, and neutral. The two first are deposited in the spring, the last in July and part of August ; or, if the summer be extremely favourable, 1 An Aocount of English Ants, by the Rev. W Gould, 1747 p. 86 70 EGGS OF APHIDES KEPT THROUGH perhaps a little sooner. The female eggs are covered with a thin black membrane, are oblong, and about the sixteenth or seventeenth part of an inch in length. The male eggs are of a more brown complexion, and usually laid in March.’ These dark eggs are not those of ants, but of aphides. The error is very pardonable, because the ants treat these eggs exactly as if they were their own, guarding and tending them with the utmost care. I first met with them in February 1876, and was much surprised to find that the ants took great care of these brown bodies, carrying them off to the lower chambers with the utmost haste when the nest was disturbed. I brought some home with me and put them near one of my own nests, when the ants carried them inside. That year I was unable to carry my observations further. In 1877 I again procured some of the same eggs, and offered them to my ants, who carried them into the nest, and in the course of March I had the satisfaction of seeing them hatch into young aphides. Huber had observed certain egg-like bodies in ants’ nests. These, however, were not in his opinion true eggs. On the contrary, he agreed with Bonnet, ‘that the insect, in a state nearly perfect, quits the body of its mother in that covering which shelters it from the cold in winter, and that it is not, as other germs are, in the egg surrounded by food by means of which it is developed and supported. It is nothing more than an asylum of which the aphides born THE WINTER BY ANTS. ce at another season have no need; it is on this account some are produced naked, others enveloped in a covering. The mothers are not, then, truly oviparous, since their young are almost as perfect as they ever will be, in the asylum in which Nature has placed them at their birth.’ ! This is, I think, a mistake. Ido not propose here to describe the anatomy of the aphis; but I may observe that I have examined the female, and find these eggs to arise in the manner described by Huxley,? and which I have also myself observed in other aphides and in allied genera.*? Moreover, I have opened the eggs themselves, and have also examined sections, and have { satisfied myself that they are really eggs containing ordinary yelk. So far from the young insect being ‘nearly perfect,’ and merely enveloped in a protective membrane, no limbs or internal organs are present. In fact, the young aphis does not develop in them until shortly before they are hatched.‘ In any case Huber supposed that they belonged to the aphides which live in the ants’ nests. When my eggs hatched I naturally also thought that the aphides belonged to one of the species usually found on the roots of plants in the nests of Laszus flavus. To my surprise, however, the young creatures 1 The Natural History of Ants, by M. P. Huber, 1820, p. 246. 2 Linnean Transactions, 1858. 8 Philosophical Transactions, 1859. 4 J do not enter here into the technical question of the difference between ova and pseudova. I believe these to be true ova, but the point is that they are not a mere envelope containing a young aphis, but eggs in the ordinary sense, the contents of which consist of yelk, and in which the young aphis is gradually developed. 72 EGGS OF APHIDES KEPT THROUGH made the best of their way out of the nest, and, indeed, were sometimes brought out by the ants themselves, In vain I tried them with roots of grass &.; they war.dered uneasily about, and eventually died. More- over, they did not in any way resemble the subterranean species. In 1878 I again attempted to rear these young aphides; but though I hatched a great many eggs, I did not succeed. In 1879, however, I was more fortunate. The eggs commenced to hatch the first week in March. Near one of my nests of Lasius flavus, in which I had placed some of the eggs in question, was a glass containing living specimens of several species of plant commonly found on or around ants’ nests. To this some of the young aphides were brought by the ants. Shortly afterwards I observed on a plant of daisy, in the axils of the leaves, some small aphides, very much resembling those from my nest, though we had not actually traced them continuously, They seemed thriving, and remained stationary on the daisy. Moreover, whether they had sprung from the black eggs or not, the ants evidently valued them, for they built up a wall of earth round and over them. So things remained throughout the summer; but on the 9th October I found that the aphides had laid some eggs exactly resembling those found in the ants’ nests ; and on examining daisy-plants from outside, I found on many of them similar aphides, and more or less of the same eggs. I confess these observations surprised me very much. THE WINTER BY ANTS. 73 The fact that Huber found eggs of aphides in ants’ nests, though confirmed by Schmarda, did not attract so much notice as many of the other interesting facts which they have recorded ; because if aphides are kept by ants in their nests, it seems only natural that their eggs should also occur. The above case, however, is much more remarkable. Here are aphides, not living in the ants’ nests, but outside, on the leaf-stalks of plants. The eggs are laid early in October on the food-plant of the insect. They are of no direct use to the ants, yet they are not left where they are laid, exposed to the severity of the weather and to innumerable dangers, but are brought into their nests by the arts, and tended by them with the utmost care through the long winter months until the following March, when the young ones are brought out and again placed on the young shoots of the daisy. This seems to me a most remarkable case of prudence. Our ants may not perhaps lay up food for the winter ; but they do more, for they keep during six months the eggs which will enable them to procure food during the following summer, a case of prudence unexampled in the animal kingdom. The nests of our common yellow ant (Lasius flavus) contain in abundance four or five species of aphis, more than one of which appears to be as yet undescribed. In addition, however, to the insects belonging to this family, there are a large number of others which live habitually in ants’ nests, so that we may truly say that our English ants possess a much greater variety of 74 OTHER DOMESTIC ANIMALS domestic animals than we do ourselves. Marke! satis- fied himself that large nests of Formica rufa might contain at least a thousand of such guests;! and I believe that the aphides in a large nest of Lasius flavus would often be even more numerous. André? gives a list of no less than 584 species of insects, which are habitually found in association with ants, and of which 542 are beetles. The association of some of these insects with ants may be purely accidental and without significance. In some of them no doubt the bond of union is merely the selection of similar places of abode; in some few others the ants are victimized by parasites of which they cannot rid themselves. There are, for instance, the parasitic mites, and the small black fly, belonging to the genus Phora, which lays her eggs on ants, and which I have already mentioned. Then there are some insects, such as the caterpillar of that beautiful beetle, the rosechafer, which find a congenial place of residence among the collection of bits of stick, &e., with which certain species of ants make their nests, Another class of ant guests are those which reside actually in the galleries and chambers of, and with, the ants, but which the latter never touch. Of these the commonest in England are a species allied to Podura, for which I have proposed the name Beckia (PI. V. 1 Beit. zur Kenntniss der unter Ameisen lebenden Insekten, Markel, Germans Zeit. f. Ent. 1841, p. 210. 2 Rev, et Mag. de Zool. 1874, p. 205, KEPT BY ANTS. io fig. 5). It is an active bustling little being, and I have kept hundreds, I may say thousands, in my nests. They run about in and out among the ants, keeping their an- tenne in a perpetual state of vibration. Another very common species is a white crustacean allied to the wood- louse (Pl. V. fig. 7), and enjoying the rather long name of Platyarthrus Hoffmanseggit. André only mentions Platyarthrus as living with Formica rufa, Myrmica scabrinodis, and Leptothorax acervorum. I have found it also with Lasius niger, L. flavus, and F. fusca. It runs about, and is evidently at home, among the ants. Both Platyarthrus and Beckia, from living constantly in the dark, have become blind; I say ‘have become,’ because their ancestors ‘no doubt had eyes. In neither of these cases have I ever seen an ant take the slightest notice of either of these insects. One might almost imagine they had the cap of invisibility. It is certain that the ants intentionally (if I may so say) sanction the residence of these insects in their nests. An unauthorised interloper would be at once killed. I have, therefore, ventured to suggest that these insects may, perhaps, act as scavengers. In other cases the association is more close, and the ants take the greatest care of their guests. It appears that many of these insects produce a secretion which serves as food for the ants. This is certainly the case, for instance, with the curious blind beetle, Claviger (Pl. V. fig. 8), (so called from its club- i6 MYRMECOPHILOUS BEETLES. shaped antenne), which is quite blind,! and appears to be absolutely dependent upon the ants, as Miiller first pointed out. It even seems to have lost the power of feeding itself; at any rate it is habitually fed by the ants, who supply it with nourishment as they do one another, Miller saw the ants caressing the beetles with their antennze. The Clavigers have certain tufts of hairs at the base of the elytra, and Miiller, whose observations have since been confirmed by subsequent entomologists, saw the ants take these tufts of hairs into their mouths and lick them, as well as the whole upper surface of the body, with apparently the greatest enjoyment. Grimm? has made a similar observation with reference to Dinarda dentata, another of these myrmecophilous beetles. He several times observed the ants licking the tuft of hairs at the end of the abdomen. Lespés? has con- firmed this. On one occasion he saw an ant feed a Lomechusa. Several of the former were sucking a morsel of sugar. The beetle approached one of them, and tapped her several times on the head with her antennsz. The ant then opened her mandibles, and fed the Lomechusa as she would have done one of her own species. The Lomechusa crept on the sugar, but did not appear able to feed herself. As might naturally be expected the myrmecophilous insects are not found indiscriminately in the nests of 1 Germar’s Mag. de Zool. 1818, p. 69. % Stettin. Ent. Zeit. 1845, p. 123. 3 Ann. Soc. Ent. France, 1855, p. 61. PETS, 77 ants, bat while some associate with several species, many are confined to a few or even to one. V. Hagens is of opinion! that in some of these beetles which frequent the nests of two or more species of ant, varieties have been produced. Thus he has observed that the specimens of Thiasophila angulata in nests of Formica congerens are darker than those found with F. exsecta. Hetwrius sesquicornis found with Lasius niger and Tapimoma erraticum are smaller than those which occur in the nests of larger ants; and the form of Dinarda dentata, which is met with in nests of F. sanguinea, has rather wider wing- cases than the normal type. I would by no means intend to imply that the relations between ants and the ower insects which live with them are exhausted by the above suggestions. On the contrary, various other reasons may be imagined which may render the presence of these insects useful or agreeable to the ants. For instance, they may emit an odour which is pleasant to the ants. Again, Mr. Francis Galton has, I think, rendered it very probable that some of our domestic animals were kept as pets before they were made of any use. Unlikely as this may appear in some cases, for instance in the pig, we know as a fact that pigs are often kept by savages as pets. I would not put it forward as a suggestion which can be supported by any solid reasoning, but it 1 Berlin. Ent. Zeit. 1865, p. 108. 78 RELATIONS BETWEEN DIFFERENT seems not altogether impossible that some of these tame insects may be kept as pets, It is from this point of view a very interesting fact that, according to Forel, in the cases of Chenniwm and Batrisus there is rarely more than one beetle in each nest.! I now come to the relations existing between the different species of ants. It is hardly necessary to say that, as a general rule, each species lives by itself. There are, however, some in- teresting exceptions. The little Stenamma Westwoodit (Pl. III. fig. 3) is found exclusively in the nests of the much larger F. rufa and the allied F. pratensis. We do not know what the relations between the two species are. The Stenammas, however, follow the Formicas when they change their nest, running about among them and between their legs, tapping them inquisitively with their antennz, and even sometimes climbing on to their backs, as if for a ride, while the large ants seem to take little notice of them. They almost seem to be the dogs, or perhaps the cats, of the ants. Another small species, Solenopsis fugax (Pl. III. fig. 4), which makes its chambers and galleries in the walls of the nests of larger species, is the bitter enemy of its hosts. The latter cannot get at them, because they are too large to enter the galleries. The little Solenopsis, there- fore, are quite safe, and, as it appears, make incursions into the nurseries of the larger ant, and carry off the ) Fourmis de la Suisse, p. 426. SPECIES OF ANTS. 79 larvee as food. It is as if we had small dwarfs, about eighteen inches to two feet long, harbouring in the walls of our houses, and every now and then carrying off some of our children into their horrid dens. Most ants, indeed, will carry off the larvee and pups of others if they get a chance; and this explains, or at any rate throws some light upon, that most remarkable phenomenon, the existence of slavery among ants. If you place a number of larve and pupe in front of a nest of the Horse ant (F. rufa), for instance, they are soon carried off; and those which are not immediately required for food remain alive for some time, and are even fed by their captors. Both the Horse ant (Formica rufa, Pl. II. fig. 5) and the slave ant (F. fusca, Pl. I. fig. 3) are abun- dant species, and it must not unfrequently occur that the former, being pressed for food, attack the latter and carry off some of their larve and pupae. Under these circumstances it no doubt occasionally happens that the pupze come to maturity in the nests of the Horse ant, and it is said that nests are some- times, though rarely, found in which, with the legiti- mate owners, there are a few F. fuscas. With the Horse ant this is, however, a very rare and exceptional phenomenon ; but with an allied species, F. sanguinea (Pl. I. fig. 6), a species which exists in some of our southern counties and throughout Europe, it has become an established habit. The F. sanguineas make periodical expeditions, attack neighbouring nests, 80 SLAVE-MAKING ANTS. carrying off the larve and pup, selecting those which will produce workers. When the latter come to maturity they find themselves in a nest consisting partly of FP. sanguineas, partly of their own species, the results of previous expeditions. They adapt themselves to cir- cumstances, assist in the ordinary household duties, and, having no young of their own species, feed and tend those of the F. sanguineas. But though the F. sanguineas are thus aided by their slaves, or as they should rather perhaps be called, their auxiliaries, they have not themselves lost the instinct of working. It seems not improbable that there is some division of functions between the two species, but we have as yet no distinct knowledge on this point; and at any rate the F. sangwineas can ‘do’ for themselves, and carry on a nest, if necessary, without slaves. The species usually enslaved by F. sanguinea are Formica fusca and F. rufibarbis, which indeed are so similar that they are perhaps varieties rather than species. Sometimes both occur in the same nest. André says that they also make slaves of Formica gagates.' Schenk asserts? the same of Lasius alienus, and F. Smith of ZL. flavus, but Forel denies these statements.’ Another species, Polyergus rufescens, is much more dependent on its slaves, being, indeed, almost entirely so. 1 Rev. et Mag. de Zool. 1874, p. 164. 2 Cat. of Brit. Foss. Hymen., p. 7. 8 Fourmis de la Suisse, p. 363. FORMICA—POLYERGUS, 81 For the knowledge of the existence of slavery among ants we are indebted to Huber,! and [ cannot resist quoting the passage in which he records his discovery :—‘ On June 17, 1804,’ he says, ‘ while walk- ing in the environs of Geneva, between four and five in the evening, I observed close at my feet, traversing the road, a legion of Rufescent ants. ‘They moved in a body with considerable rapidity, and occupied a space of from eight to ten inches in length, by three or four in breadth. In a few minutes they quitted the road, passed a thick hedge, and entered a pasture ground, where I followed them. They wound along the grass without straggling, and their column remained unbroken, notwithstanding the ob- stacles they had to surmount. At length they ap- proached a nest, inhabited by dark ash-coloured ants, the dome of which rose above the grass, at a distance of twenty feet from the hedge. Some of its inhabitants were guarding the entrance; but, on the discovery of an approaching army, darted forth upon the advanced guard. The alarm spread at the same moment in the interior, and their companions came forth in numbers from their underground residence. The Rufescent ants, the bulk of whose army lay only at the distance of two paces, quickened their march to arrive at the foot of the ant-hill; the whole battalion, in an instant, fell upon and overthrew the ash-coloured ants, who, after a, short but obstinate conflict, retired to the buttom of ' The Natural History of Ants, by M. P. Huber, p. 249. G 82 EXPEDITIONS OF POLYERGUS, their nest. The Rufescent ants now ascended the hillock, collected in crowds on the summit, and took possession of the principal avenues, leaving some of their companions to work an opening in the side of the ant-hill with their teeth. Success crowned their enter- prise, and by the newly-made breach the remainder of the army entered. Their sojourn was, however, of short duration, for in three or four minutes they returned by the same apertures which gave them entrance, each bearing off in its mouth a larva or a pupa.’ The expeditions generally start in the afternoon, and are from 100 to 2,000 strong. Polyergus rufescens present a striking lesson of the degrading tendency of slavery, for these ants have become entirely dependent on their slaves. Even their bodily structure has undergone a change: the mandibles have lost their teeth, and have become mere nippers, deadly weapons indeed, but useless except in war. They have lost the greater part of their instincts: their art, that is, the power of building; their domestic habits, for they show no care for their own young, all this being done by the slaves; their industry—they take no part in providing the daily supplies; if the colony changes the situation of its nest, the masters are all carried by the slaves on their backs to the new one; nay, they have even lost the habit of feeding. Huber placed thirty of them with some larve and pups and a supply of honey in a box. ‘At first,’ he says, POLYERGUS FED BY THE SLAVES, 83 ‘they appeared to pay some little attention to the larvee, they carried them here and there, but presently replaced them. More than one-half of the Amazons died of hunger in less than two days. They had not even traced out a dwelling, and the few ants still in existence were languid and without strength. I com- miserated their condition, and gave them one of their black companions. This individual, unassisted, estab- lished order, formed a chamber in the earth, gathered together the larve, extricated several young ants that were ready to quit the condition of pup, and preserved the life of the remaining Amazons.’ This observation has been fully confirmed by other naturalists. However small the prison, however large the quantity of food, these stupid creatures will starve in the midst of plenty rather than feed themselves. M. Forel was kind enough to send me a nest of Polyergus, and I kept it under observation for more than four years. My specimens of Polyergus certainly never fed themselves, and when the community changed its nest, which they did several times, the mistresses were carried from the one to the other by the slaves. I was even able to observe one of their marauding ex- peditions, in which, however, the slaves took a part. I do not doubt that, as Huber tells us, specimens of Polyergus if kept by themselves in a box would soon die of starvation, even if supplied with food. I have, however, kept isolated specimens for three months by giving them a slave for an hour or two a day to clean q2 84 STRONGYLOGNATHUS. and feed them: under these circumstances they re- mained in perfect health, while, but for the slaves, they would have perished in two or three days. Ex- cepting the slave-making ants, and some of the Myr- mecophilous beetles above described, I know no case in nature of an animal having lost the instinct of feeding. In P. rufescens, the so-called workers, though thus helpless and idle, are numerous, energetic, and in some respects even brilliant. In another slave- making ant, Strongylognathus, the workers are much less numerous, and so weak that it is an un- solved problem how they contrive to make slaves. In the genus Strongylognathus there are two species, S. hubert and S. testaceus. S. huberi, which was discovered by Forel, very much resembles Polyergua rufescens in habits. They have sabre-like mandibles, like those of Polyergus, and their mode of fighting is similar, but they are much weaker insects; they make slaves of Tetramoriwm cespitum, which they carry off as pupe. In attacking the Tetramoriwms they seize them by the head with their jaws, just in the same way as Polyergus, but have not strength enough to pierce them as the latter do. Nevertheless, the Tetra- moriwms seem much afraid of them. The other species, Strongylognathus testaceus, is even weaker than S. huberi, and their mode of life is still in many respects an enigma. They also keep the workers of Tetramorium in, so to say, a state of DEGRADATION OF STRONGYLOGNATHUS, 85 slavery, but how they procure the slaves is still a mystery. They fight in the same manner as Polyergus: but yet Schenk, Von Hagens, and Forel all agree that they are no match for the Tetramoriuwms, a courageous species, and one which lives in large communities. On one occasion Forel brought a nest of Tetramoriwm and put it down very near one of Strongylogna- thus testaceus with Tetramorium slaves. A battle at once commenced between the two communities. The Strongylognathus rushed boldly to the fight, but, though their side won the day, this was mainly due to the slaves. The Strongylognathus themselves were almost all killed ; and though the energy of their attack seemed at first to disconcert their opponents, Forel assures us that they did not succeed in killing even a single Tetramorium. In fact, as Forel graphically observes, Strongylognathus is ‘une triste caricature * of Polyergus, and it seems almost impossible that by themselves they could successfully attack a nest of Tetramorium. Moreover, in Strongylognathus, the workers are comparatively few. Nevertheless, they are always found with the Tetramoriwms, and in these mixed nests there are no males or females of Tetra- moriwm, but only those of Strongylognathus. Again, the whole work of the nest is done by the slaves, though Strongylognathus has not, like Polyergus, entirely lost the power of feeding itself. But if the economy of Strongylognathus is an enigma, that of Anergates is still more mysterious. 86 ANERGATES, The genus Anergates was discovered by Schenk,} who found a small community consisting of males, females and workers, which he naturally supposed to belong to one species. Mayr, however, pointed out? that the workers were in fact workers of Tetramorium cespitum ; and it would appear that while in Strongy- lognathus the workers are comparatively few, Aner- gates differs from other ants in having no workers at all. The males and females live with Tetramoriwm cespitwm, and are in several respects very peculiar,-— for instance, the male is wingless. One might consider it rather a case of parasitism than of slavery, but the difficulty is that in these mixed nests there are no males, females, or young of Tetramorvum. As to this all ob- servers are agreed. It seems quite clear that Aner- gates cannot procure its slaves, if such they are, by marauding expeditions like those of Polyergus; in the first place, because the Anergates are too few, and secondly, because they are too weak. The whole ques- tion is rendered still more difficult by the fact that neither Von Hagens? nor Forel ever found either larva or pup of Tetramorium in the mixed nests. The com- munity consisted of males and females of Anergates, accompanied and tended by workers of T'etramorium cespitum. The Anergates are absolutely dependent 1 ‘Die Nassauischen Ameisen-Species,’ Stettin Ent. Zeit. 1853, - ee Formicide, p. 56. 8 Verh. des Natur. Vereines der Preuss. Rheinlande und West- phalens, 1867, p.53. Seealso V. Hagens. Berl. Eni Zeit. 1867, p. 102 HABITS OF ANERGATES, 87 upon their slaves, and cannot even feed themselves, The whole problem is, therefore, most puzzling and interesting.! As regards Strongylognathus, Von Hagens made two suggestions, the first being that this insect is really a monstrous form of Jetramoriwm. This, however, cannot at any rate be the case with Anergates. On the whole, then, he inclined to think that perhaps the nests containing Strongylognathus or Anergates are only parts of a community, and that the young of the Tetramoriums are in another nest of the same com- munity. This would account for the absence of the young of the Tetramoriums, but would not remove all the difficulties. It is in other respects not consistent with what we know of the habits of ants, and on the whole I agree with Forel in thinking the suggestion untenable. The difficulty of accounting for the numbers of Tetramoriums, coupled with the absence of young, was indeed almdst insuperable as long as the workers were supposed to live only for one year. My observa-~ tions, however, which show that even in captivity workers may live for as long as six years, place the ques- tion in a different position, and give us, I think, aclue. On the whole, I would venture to suggest that the male and female Anergates make their way into a nest * On the contrary, in Tomognathus sublevis, a Finland species which lives in the nests of Leptothorax muscorum and L. acervorum. the workers only are known. The male, like that of Anergates, 18 wingless. 88 EXPLANATION OF THE PRESENT STATE OF of Tetramorium, and in some manner contrive to assas- sinate their queen. I have shown that a nest of ants may continue, even in captivity, for six years, without a queen. If, therefore, the female of Anergates could by violence or poison destroy the queen of the Tetra- morvums, we should in the following year have a com- munity composed of the two Anergates, their young, and workers of J'etramorium, in the manner described by Van Hagens and Fore]. This would naturally not have suggested itself to these naturalists, because if the life of an ant had, as was formerly supposed, been confined to a single season, it would of course have been out of the question; but as we now know that the life of ants is so much more prolonged than had been supposed, it is at least not an impossibility. It is conceivable that the Z'etramoriwme may have gradually become harder and stronger; the marauding expeditions would then be less fruitful and more dan- gerous, and might become less and less frequent. If, then, we suppose that the females found it possible to establish themselves in nests of Tetramoriwm, the present state of things would almost inevitably be, by degrees, established. Thus we may explain the re- markable condition of Strongylognathus, armed with weapons which it is too weak to use, and endowed with instincts which it cannot exercise. At any rate, these four genera offer us every grada- tion from lawless violence to contemptible parasitism. Formica sanguinea, which may be assumed to have STRONGYLOGNATHUS AND ANERGATES, 89 comparatively recently taken to slave-making, has not as yet been materially affected. Polyergus, on the contrary, already illustrates the lowering tendency of slavery. They have lost their knowledge of art, their natural affection for their young, and even their instinct of feeding! They are, however, bold and powerful marauders. In Strongylognathus, the enervating influence of slavery has gone further, and told even on the bodily strength. They are no longer able to capture their slaves in fair and open warfare. Still they retain a semblance of authority, and, when roused, will fight bravely, though in vain. In Anergates, finally, we come to the last scene of this sad history. We may safely conclude that in distant times their ancestors lived, as so many ants do now, partly by hunting, partly on honey; that by degrees they became bold marauders, and gradually took to keeping slaves; that for a time they maintained their strength and agility, though losing by degrees their real independence, their arts, and even many of their instincts; that gradually even their bodily force dwindled away under the enervating influence to which they had subjected themselves, until they sank to their present degraded condition—weak in body and mind, few in numbers, and apparently nearly extinct, the miserable representatives of far superior ancestors, maintaining a precarious existence as contemptible parasites of their former slaves, 20 PROGRESS AMONG ANTS. Lespés has given a short but interesting account of some experiments made by him on the relations existing between ants and their domestic animals, from which it might be inferred that even within the limits of a single species some communities are more advanced than others. He states that speci- mens of the curious blind beetle Claviger, which always occurs with ants, when transferred from a nest of Lasius niger to another which kept none of these domestic beetles, were invariably attacked and eaten. From this he infers that the intelligence necessary to keep Clavigers is not coextensive with the species, but belongs only to certain communities and races, which, so to say, are more advanced in civilisation than the rest of the species. With reference to the statements of Lespés, I have more than once transferred specimens of Platyarthrus from one nest to another, and always found them received amicably. I even placed specimens from a nest of Lasius flavus in one of Formica fusca with the same result. I brought from the South of France some specimens of a different species, as yet undescribed, and put them in a nest of Formica fusca, where they lived for some time, and brought up more than one brood of young. These creatures, however, occur in most ants’ nests, while Clavigers are only found in some. But whether there are differences in advancement within the limits of the same species or not, there are PHASES OF LIFE. 91 certainly considerable differences between the different species, and one may almost fancy that we can trace stages corresponding to the principal steps in the history of human development. I do not now refer to slave-making ants, which represent an abnormal, or perhaps only a temporary state of things, for slavery seems to tend in ants as in men to the degradation of those by whom it is adopted, and it is not impossible that the slave-making species will eventually find themselves unable to com- pete with those which are more self-dependent, and have reached a higher phase of civilisation. But putting these slave-making ants on one side, we find in the different species of ants difterent conditions of life, curiously answering to the eurlier stages of human progress. For instance, some species, such as Formica fusca, live principally on the produce of the chase; for though they feed partly on the honey-dew of aphides, they have not domesticated these insects. These ants probably retain the habits once common to allants. They resemble the lower races of men, who subsist mainly by hunting. Like them they frequent woods and wilds, live in comparatively small communi- ties, and the instincts of collective action are but little developed among them. They hunt singly, and their battles are single combats, like those of the Homeric heroes. Such species as Lasiws flavus represent a distinctly higher type of social life; they show more skill in architecture, may literally be said to have 92 HUNTING, PASTORAL, AND AGRICULTURAL ANTS. domesticated certain species of aphides, and may be compared to the pastoral stage of human progress—to the races which live on the produce of their flocks and herds. Their communities are more numerous; they act much more in concert; their battles are not mere single combats, but they know how to act in combina- tion. I am disposed to hazard the conjecture that they will gradually exterminate the mere hunting species, just as savages disappear before more advanced races. Lastly, the agricultural nations may be com- pared with the harvesting ants. Thus there seem to be three principal types, offer- ing a curious analogy to the three great phases—the hunting, pastoral, and agricultural stages—in the history of human development. 93 CHAPTER V. BEHAVIOUR TO RELATIONS. Mr. GROTE, in his ‘Fragments on Ethical Subjects, regards it as an evident necessity that no society can exist without the sentiment of morality. ‘ Everyone,’ he says, ‘ who has either spoken or written on the sub- ject, has agreed in considering this sentiment as ab- soiutely indispensable to the very existence of society. Without the diffusion of a certain measure of this feel- ing throughout all the members of the social union, the caprices, the desires, and the passions of each separate individual would render the maintenance of any established communion impossible. Positive morality, under some form or other, has existed in every society of which the world has ever had ex- perience.’ If this be so, the question naturally arises whether ants also are moral and accountable beings. They have their desires, their passions, even their caprices. The young are absolutely helpless. Their communities are sometimes so numerous, that perhaps London and Pekin are almost the only human cities which can compare with them. Moreover, their nests are no mere collections of independent individuals, nor even tem- 94 BEHAVIOUR OF ANTS TO ONE ANOTHER, porary associations like the flocks of migratory birds ; but organised communities labouring with the utmost harmony for the common good. The remarkable analogies which, in so many ways, they present to our human societies, render them peculiarly interesting to us, and one cannot but long to know more of their character, how the world appears to them, and to what extent they are conscious and reasonable beings. For my own part I cannot make use of Mr. Grote’s argument, because I have elsewhere! attempted to show that, even as regards man, the case is not by any means clear. But however this may be, various observers have recorded in the case of ants instances of attach- ment and affection. Forel lays it down as a general rule that if ants are slightly injured, or rather unwell, their companions take care of them: on the other hand, if they are badly wounded or seriously ill, they are carried away from the nest, and left to perish. Latreille, also, makes the following statement :—- ‘Le sens de l’odorat,’? he says,? ‘se manifestant d'une maniére aussi sensible, je voulois profiter de cette remarque pour en découvrir le siége. On a soupgonné depuis longtemps qu'il résidoit dans les antennes. Je les arrachai 4 plusieurs fourmis fauves ouvriéres, auprés du nid desquelles je me trouvois. Je vis aussit6t ces petits animaux que j’avois ainsi mutilés 1 The Origin of Civilisation and the Primitive Condition of Man. 8 Hist. Nat. des Yourmis, p. 41. STATEMENTS OF PREVIOUS OBSERVERS, 95 tomber dans un état d’ivresse ou une espéce de folie. Ils erroient ¢& et la, et ne reconnoissoient plus leur chemin. Ils m’occupoient ; mais je n’étais pas le seul. Quelques autres fourmis s’approchérent de ces pauvres affligées, portérent leur langue sur leurs blessures, et y laissérent tomber une goutte de liqueur. Cet acte de sensibilité se renouvela plusieurs fois; je l’observois avec une loupe. Animaux compatissans! quelle legon ne donnez-vous pas aux hommes.’ ‘ Jamais,’ says M. de Saint Fargeau,!' ‘une Fourmi n’en rencontre une de son espéce blessée, sans l’enlever et la transporter 4 la fourmiliére. L’y soigne-t-elle ? Je ne sais, mais je vois dans ce fait une bienveillance que je ne retrouve dans aucun autre insecte, méme social.’ I have not felt disposed to repeat M. Latreille’s experiment, and M. de St. Fargeau’s statement is I think by no means correct ; indeed, many of my expen- ences seem to show not only a difference of character in the different species of ants, but that even within the limits of the same species there are individual differences between ants, just as between men. I will commence with the less favourable aspect. On one occasion (August 13) a worker of Lasius niger, belonging to one of my nests, had got severely wounded, but not so much so that she could not feed; for though she had lost five of her tarsi, finding herself near some syrup, she crept to it and began to feed. I 1 Hist. Nat. des Ins. Hyménoptéres, vol. i. p. 99. 96 EXPERIMENTS. laid her gently on her back close to the entrance into the nest. Soon an ant came up to the poor sufferer, crossed antenne with her for a moment, then went quietly on to the syrup and began to feed. Afterwards three other ants did the same ; but none took any more notice of her. August 15.—I found at 1 p.M.a Myrmica ruginodis which, probably in a fight with another ant, had lost the terminal portion of both her antenne. She seemed to have lost her wits. I put her into her nest; but the others took no notice of her; and after wandering about a little, she retired into a solitary place, where she remained from 3 P.M. to 8 without moving. The following morning I looked for her at 5.30, and found her still at the same spot. She remained there till 9, when she came out. She remained out all day ; and the following morning I found her dead. Indeed, I have often been surprised that in certain cases ants render one another so little assistance. The tenacity with which they retain their hold on an enemy they have once seized is well known. M. Mocquerys even assures us that the Indians of Brazil made use of this quality in the case of wounds ; causing an ant to bite the two lips of the cut and thus bring them together, after which they snip off the ant’s head, which thus holds the lipstogether. He asserts that he has often seen natives with wounds in course of healing with the assistance of seven or eight ants’ heads!? 1 Ann. Soo. Ent. France, 2 sér. tom. ii. p. 67. ISOLATED COMBATS. 97 Now I have often observed that some of my ants had the heads of others hanging on to their legs for a con- siderable time; and as this must certainly be very inconvenient, it seems remarkable that their friends should not relieve them of such an awkward encum- brance. The behaviour of ants to one another differs also much according to circumstances; whether, for instance, they are alone, or supported by friends, An ant which would run away in the first case will defend herself bravely in the second. If an ant is fighting with one of another species, her friends rarely come to her assistance. They seem generally (unless a regular battle is taking place) to take no interest in the matter, and do not even stop to look on. Some species, indeed, in such cases never appear to help one another ; and even when the reverse is the case, as for instance in the genus Lasius, the truth seems to be that several of them attack the same enemy—their object being to destroy the foe, rather than to save their friend. On one occasion several specimens of Formica fusca belonging to one of my nests were feeding on some honey spread on a slip of glass (May 22). One of them had got thoroughly entangled in it. I took her and put her down just in front of another specimen belonging to the same nest, and close by I placed a drop of honey. The ant devoted herself to the honey and entirely neglected her friend, whom she left to perish, H 98 NEGLECT OF COMPANIONS IF IN TROUBLE. Again, some specimens of Cremastogaster scutellaris were feeding quietly (May 22) on some honey spread on a slip of glass, and one of them had got thoroughly mixed in it. I took her out and put her on the glass close by. She could not disentangle herself; not one of her friends took the least notice of her, and eventually she died. I then chloroformed one, and put her on the board among her friends. Several touched her, but from 12 to 2.30 P.M. none took any particular notice of her. On the other hand, I have only on one occasion seen a living ant expelled from her nest. This happened ina community of F. fusca. I observed (April 23, 1880) an ant carrying another belonging to the same commu- nity away from the nest. The condemned ant made a very feeble resistance. The first ant carried her burthen hither and thither for some time, evidently trying to get away from the nest, which was enclosed in the usual manner by a fur barrier. After watching for some time { provided the ant with a paper bridge, up which she immediately went, dropped her victim on the far side, and returned home. Could this have been a case in which an aged or invalid ant was being expelled from the nest ? I have often had ants in my nests to which mites had attached themselves. Thus, on October 14, 1876, I observed that one of my ants (Formica fusca) had a mite attached to the underside of her head, which it almost equalled EXPERIMENTS WITH INSENSIBLE ANTS, 99 in size. The poor ant could not remove it herself, and, being a queen, never left the nest, so that I had no opportunity of doing so. For more than three months none of her companions performed this kind office for her. With reference to this part of the subject, also, I have made some experiments. January 3, 1876.—I immersed an ant (Lasius niger) in water for half an hour; and when she was then to all appearance drowned, I put her on a strip of paper leading from one of my nests to some food. The strip was half an inch wide; and one of my marked ants belonging to the same nest was passing continually to and fro over it to some food. The immersed ant lay there an hour before she recovered herself; and during this time the marked ant passed by eighteen times without taking the slightest notice of her. I then immersed another ant in the water for an hour, after which I placed her on the strip of paper asin the preceding case. She was three-quarters of an hour before she recovered: during this time two marked ants were passing to and fro; one of them went by eighteen times, and the other twenty times; and two other ants also went over the paper; but none of them took the slightest notice of their drowned friend. I then immersed another ant for an hour, and put her on the strip of paper. She took an hour to recover. The same two marked ants as iu the previous observation were at.work. One passed thirty times, the H2 100 EXPERIMENTS WITH DROWNED ANTS. other twenty-eight times, besides which five others passed by ; but not one took the slightest notice. I immersed three ants for eight hours, and then put them on the strip of paper. They began to recover in three-quarters of an hour, but were not quite them- selves till half an hour afterwards. During the first three-quarters of an hour two marked ants passed, each four times ; and two others also went by. During the following half-hour the two marked ants passed sixteen times, and three others; but none of them took any notice. I immersed another ant for forty minutes, and put her on the strip of paper. She recovered in twenty minutes, during which time the marked ones, which were the same as in the preceding case, went by four- teen times without taking any notice. I immersed two ants for ten hours, and then placed them on the strip of paper. The same two marked ants passed respectively eighteen and twenty-six times, and one other passed by also without taking any notice. After this I left off watching. I immersed two ants for four hours, and then put them on the strip of paper. They began to recover in an hour, during which two marked ants, not the same as in the preceding case, passed respectively twenty-eight and ten times, and two others went by; but none of them took any notice I immersed an ant for an hour, and then put heron the same strip of paper as in the previous cases. A marked EXPERIMENTS WITH DROWNED ANTS. 101 ant passed her twelve times ; three others also went by but took no notice of her; but, on the other hand, a fourth picked her up and carried her off into the nest. Again, I immersed an ant for an hour, and put her on the strip of paper. The marked ant passed twice, after which she did not return. Soon after, another ant came by and, picking up the immersed one, carried her off to the nest. I do not bring forward these cases as proof or even as evidence that ants are less tender to friends in distress than previous observers have stated to be the case; but they certainly show that tenderness is not invariably the rule ; and, especially when taken in connexion with the following cases, they are interesting illustrations of the individual differences existing between ants—thkat there are Priests and Levites, and good Samaritans among them, as among men. As evidence both of their intelligence and of their affection for their friends, it has been said by various observers that when ants have been accidentally buried they have been very soon dug out and rescued by their companions. Without for one moment doubting the facts as stated, we must remember the habit which ants have of burrowing in loose fresh soil, and especially their practice of digging out fresh galleries when their nests are disturbed. It seemed to me, however, that it would not be difficult to test whether the excavations made by ants under the circumstances were the result of this general LU2 EXPERIMENTS WITH BURIED ANTS. habit, or really due to a desire to extricate their friends. With this view I tried the following experiments :— (1) On August 20 I placed some honey near a nest of Lasius niger on a glass surrounded with water, and so arranged that in reaching it the ants passed over another glass covered with a layer of sifted earth, about one-third of an inch in thickness. I then put some ants to the honey, and by degrees a considerable num- ber collected round it. Then at 1.30 p.m. I buried an ant from the same nest under the earth, and left her. there till 5 p.m., when I uncovered her. She was only | just covered by the earth, and was none the worse, but during the whole time not one of her friends had taken the least notice of her. (2) I arranged (September 1) some honey again in the same way. At 5 P.M. about fifty ants were at the honey, and a considerable number passing to and fro. I then buried an ant as before, taking of course one from the same nest. At 7 p.m. the number of ants at the honey had nearly doubled. At 10 p.m. they were still more numerous, and had carried off about two- thirds of the honey. At 7 a.m. the next morning the honey was all gone, two or three were still wandering about, but no notice had been taken of the prisoner, whom I then let out. In this case I allowed the honey to be finished, because I thought it might perhaps be alleged that the excitement produced by such a treasure distracted their attention, or even (on the principle of doing the greatest good to the greatest number) that EXPERIMENTS WITH BURIED ANTS. 103 they were intelligently wise in securing a treasure of food before they rescued their comrade, who, though in confinement, was neither in pain nor danger. So far as the above ants, however, are concerned, this cannot, I think, be urged. (3) On the 8th September I repeated the experi- ment, burying someantsat 4P.M. Up to 6.3 no attempt had been made to release them. I let them out and buried some more. The next morning, at 7 a.M., the honey was all gone, some ants were still wandering about, but no notice had been taken of the captives, whom I then liberated. . (4) I then (August 21) made exactly the same experiment with Myrmica ruginodis, as representing the other great family of ants, and with the same result. In order to test the affection of ants belonging to the same nest for one another I tried the following experiments. I took six ants from a nest of PF. fusca, imprisoned them in a small bottle, one end of which was covered with a layer of muslin. I then put the muslin close to the door of the nest. The muslin was of open texture, the meshes, however, being sufficiently small to prevent the ants from escaping. They could not only, however, see one another, but communicate freely with their antenne. We now watched to see whether the prisoners would be tended or fed by their friends. We could not, however, observe that the least notice was taken of them. The experiment, nevertheless, was less conclusive than 104 CONTRAST OF BEHAVIOUR could be wished, because they might have been fed at night, or at some time when we were not looking. It struck me, therefore, that it would be interesting te treat some strangers also in the same manner. On September 2, therefore, I put two ants from one of my nests of F. fusca into a bottle, the end of which was tied up with muslin as described, and laid it down close to the nest. In a second bottle I put two ants from another nest of the same species. The ants which were at liberty took no notice of the bottle con- taining their imprisoned friends. The strangers in the other bottle, on the contrary, excited them considerably. The whole day one, two, or more ants stood sentry, as it were, over the bottle. In the evening no less than twelve were collected round it, a larger number than usually came out of the nest at any one time. The whole of the next two days,in the same way, there were more or less ants round the bottle containing the strangers; while, as far as we could see, no notice whatever was taken of the friends. On the 9th the ants had eaten through the muslin, and effected an entrance. We did not chance to be on the spot at the moment; but as I found two ants lying dead, one in the bottle and one just outside, I think there can be no doubt that the strangers were put to death. The friends throughout were quite neglected. September 21.—I then repeated the experiment, putting three ants from another nest in a bottle as before. The same scene was repeated. The friends TO FRIENDS AND STRANGERS. 105 were neglected. On the other hand, some of the ants were always watching over the bottle containing the strangers, and biting at the muslin which protected them. The next morning at 6 a.m. I found five ants thus occupied. One had caught hold of the leg of one of the strangers, which had unwarily been allowed to protrude through the meshes of the muslin. They worked and watched, though not, as far as I could see, with any system, till 7.30 in the evening, when they effected an entrance, and immediately attacked the strangers. September 24.—I repeated the same experiment with the same nest. Again the ants came and sat over the bottle containing the strangers, while no notice was taken of the friends. The next morning again, when I got up, I found five ants round the bottle containing the strangers, none near the friends. As in the former case, one of the ants had seized a stranger by the leg, and was trying to drag her through the muslin. All day the ants clustered round the bottle, and bit perseveringly, though not systematically, at the muslin. The same thing happened all the following day. These observations seemed to me sufficiently to test the behaviour of the ants belonging to this nest under these circumstances. I thought it desirable, however, to try also other communities. I selected, therefore, two other nests. One was a community of Polyergus rufescens with numerous slaves. Close to where the 106 INSTANCES OF KINDNESS TO FRIENDS. ants of this nest came to feed, I placed as before two small bottles, closed in the same way—one containing two slave ants from the nest, the other two strangers. These ants, however, behaved quite unlike the pre- ceding, for they took no notice of either bottle, and showed no sign either of affection or hatred. One is almost tempted to surmise that the warlike spirit of these ants was broken by slavery. The other nest which I tried, also a community of Formica fusca, behaved exactly like the first. They took no notice of the bottle containing the friends, but clustered round and eventually forced their way into that containing the strangers. It seems, therefore, that in these curious insects hatred is a stronger passion than affection. Some of those who have done me the honour of noticing my papers in the ‘Linnean Journal,’ have assumed that I disputed altogether the kindly feelings which have been attributed to ants. I should, however, be very sorry to treat my favour- ites so unfairly. So far as I can observe, ants of the same nest never quarrel. I have never seen the slightest evidence of ill-temper in any of my nests: all is harmony. Nor are instances of active assistance at all rare. Indeed, I have myself wit- nessed various cases showing care and tenderness on their part. In one of my nests of Formica fusca was an ant — which had come into the world without antenne. Never having previously met with such a case, I A CRIPPLED ANT. 107 watched her with great interest ; but she never ap- peared to leave the nest. At length one day I found her wandering about in an aimless sort of manner, and apparently not knowing her way at all. After a while she fell in with some specimens of Lasius flavus, who directly attacked her. I at once set myself to separate them; but whether owing to the wounds she had ceceived from her enemies, or tomy rough, though well- meant handling, or to both, she was evidently much wounded, and lay helplessly on the ground. After some time another Formica fusca from her nest came by. She examined the poor sufferer carefully, then picked her up carefully and carried her away into the nest. It would have been difficult for any one who witnessed this scene to have denied to this ant the possession of humane feelings. Again, in one of my nests of Formica fusca ou January 23, 1881, I perceived a poor ant lying on her back and quite unable to move. The legs were in cramped attitudes, and the two antenne rolled up in spirals. She was, of course, altogether unable to feed herself. After this I kept my eye on her. Several times I tried uncovering the part of the nest where she was. The other ants soon carried her into the shaded part. On March 4 the ants were all out of the nest, probably for fresh air, and had collected together in a comer of the box; they had not, however, forgotten her, but had carried her with them. I took off the glass lid of the box, and after a while they returned as usual to the nest, taking her in again. On March 5 108 A DEAD QUEEN. she was still alive, but on the 15th, notwithstanding all their care, she was dead! At the present time I have two other ants perfectly crippled in a similar manner, and quite unable to move, which have lived in two different nests, belonging also to F. fusca, the one for five the other for four months. In May 1879 I gave a lecture on Ants at the Royal Institution, and was anxious to exhibit a nest of Lasius flavus with the queen. While preparing the nest, on May 9, we accidentally crushed the queen. The ants, however, did not desert her, or drag her out as they do dead workers, but, on the contrary, carried her with them into the new nest, and subse- quently into a larger one with which I supplied them, congregating round her, just as if she had been alive, for more than six weeks, when we lost sight of her. In order to ascertain whether ants knew their fellows by any sign or pass word, as has been suggested in the case of bees, I was anxious to see if they could re- cognise them when in a state of insensibility. I tried therefore the following experiments with some specimens of Lasius flavus. September 10, at 6 p.m., a number of these ants were out feeding on some honey, placed on one of my tables, and surrounded by a moat of water. I chloroformed four of them and also four from a nest in my park, at some distance from the place where the first had been origi- nally procured, painted them, and put them close to the honey. Up to 8.20 the ants had taken no notice of BEHAVIOUR TO CHLOROFORMED FRIENDS. 109 their insensible fellow creatures. At 9.20 I found that four friends were still lying as before, while the four strangers had been removed. Two of them I found had been thrown over the edge of the board on which the honey was placed. The other two I could not see. Again, on September 14, at 8.40, I put in the same way four friends marked white, and four strangers marked red, close to where my L. flavus were out feeding on honey placed on a slip of glass over water. For some hours they took no notice of them. At length one took a friend, and after carrying her about some time dropped her, at 12.40, into the water. Some time after another took up a stranger and carried her into the nest at 2.35. A second stranger was similarly carried into the nest at 2.55, a third at 3.45, while the fourth was thrown over the edge of the board at 4.20. Shortly after this two of the strangers were brought out of the nest again and thrown into the water. A second friend was thrown away, like the first, at 4.58, the third at 5.17, and the fourth at 5.46. I could not ascertain what happened to the last stranger, but have little doubt that she was brought out of the nest and thrown away like the rest. On the following day at 6.45 I tried the same ex- periment again, only reversing the colors by which they were distinguished. At 7 one of the strangers was carried off and dropped over the edge of the glass into the water, and at 8asecond. At 8.45 a friend was taken up and, after being carried about some time, was thrown into 110 BEHAVIOUR TO CHLOROFORMED FRIENDS. the moat. At 9.45 a friend was picked up and carried into the nest, but brought out again and thrown away about 3 in the afternoon. The other four remained where they were placed until 8 P.M., and though the other ants often came up and examined them, they did not carry them off. September 29.—Again placed nine chloroformed ants, five friends and four strangers, close to where a number were feeding. There was a continual stream of ants to the honey, ten or fifteen being generally there at once. A stranger was picked upat 10.20 bearteiLtieics | 10.32 os “6 & 10.22 - 10.35 A friend Bs = 1122 BA 11.42 Astranger ,, os 11235 3 11.50 Bs x 11.41 3 11.45 Shortly after the others were picked up and carried away to the edge of the board, where they were dropped, but none were taken into the nest. October 2.—Again at 10 a.m. placed ten chloro- formed ants, five friends and five strangers, close to where some were feeding. They were picked up and carried off as before in the following order :— At 11. 5 a stranger was picked up and dropped at 11.15 11.12 a friend . 3 11.50 11.25 a stranger 3 = 11.36 WIE cl Be 5 a 12.45 12.10 a friend s en 12,16 BEHAVIOUR TO CHLOROFORMED FRIENDS. 111 At 1.10 a stranger was picked up and dropped at 2. 6 1.42 a friend 9 4 1.46 HES Dectov1i,3 e x 1.56 2.6 x . % 3.10 Only one of them, and that one a stranger, was carried into the nest at 12.45, but brought out again at 1.10. October 6.—At 9 a.M. again tried the same experi- ment with four strangers and five friends. At 9.25 a friend was picked up and dropped at 9.31 oia2 3 HS ‘ 9.38 9.35 a stranger 3 3 9.45 9.45 a friend ‘< <9 9,52 10. 8 a stranger 5 = 10.17 10.17 a friend a BA 1u.20 10.22 a stranger os * 10.25 10.28 - As pa 10.40 10.25 a friend 7 s 10.31 None of them were carried into the nest. These experiments seem to prove that under such circumstances ants, at least those belonging to this species, do not carry off their friends (when thus rendered insensible) into a place of safety. I think, however, that in this experiment the ants being to all intents and purposes dead, we could not expect that any difference would be made between friends and strangers. I therefore repeated the same experiment, only, instead of chloroforming the auts, L intoxicated them. This experiment is more difficult, 112 BEHAVIOUR TO INTOXICATED FRIENDS, as it is not in all cases easy to hit off the requisite degree of intoxication. The numbers therefore of friends and strangers are not quite the same, because in some cases the ants recovered too quickly and had to be removed. In such cases I have latterly replaced the ant so removed by another, so as to keep the number of friends and strangers about equal. The sober ants seemed somewhat puzzled at finding their intoxicated fellow creatures in such a disgraceful con- dition, took them up, and carried them about for a time in a somewhat aimless manner. November 20.—I experimented with six friends and six strangers, beginning at 11. At 11.30 a friend was carried to the nest. 11.50 a stranger was dropped into the water. 12.30 99 ” rt) 12.31 a friend ss Ps 1.10 a stranger ” a 1.18 9 9 33 1.27 99 9 29 1.30 a friend (partly recovered) was taken to the nest. 2.30 a friend was taken up and carried about till 2.55; she was then taken to the nest, but at the door the bearer met two other ants, which seized the intoxicated one, carried her off, and eventually dropped her into the water. At 3.35 a friend was carried to the nest. Out of these twelve, five strangers and two friends BEHAVIOUR TO INTOXICATED FRIENDS, 113 were dropped into the water; none of the strangers, but three friends were taken to the nest. None of the friends were brought out of the nest again. November 22.—Experimented in the same way on four friends and four strangers, beginning at 12 o’clock. At 12.16 a stranger was taken and dropped into the water. 12.21 ” ” 39 12.23 be) 99 93 12.40 3 os on { then put four more strangers treated as before. At 3.10 a stranger was taken and dropped into the water. o 3.30 ” 99 ” 3.35 9 9 ” 3.44 a friend (partly recovered) was taken back to the nest. 4.10 a stranger was taken and dropped into the water. 4.13 a friend (partly recovered) was taken back to the nest. In this case eight strangers were dropped into the water, and none were taken to the nest; two friends, on the contrary, were taken to the nest, and none were dropped into the water. December 1.—Experimented with five friends and five strangers, beginning at 2.15. At 2.30 a stranger was dropped into the water. 3. 2 99 3%” ” 114 BEHAVIOUR TO INTOXICATED FRIENDS. At 3.20 a friend was taken into the nest. 3.35 a stranger was taken into the nest, but after- wards brought out again and thrown into the water. 3.52 99 »” ” ” 4. 51 put out four more friends and as many strangers. | 4.45 a stranger was dropped into the water. 5.10 . taken into the nest, but afterwards brought out and thrown into the water. §.24 : taken into the nest, but afterwards brought out and thrown into the water. 5.55 a friend was thrown into the water. 6. 4. a stranger io - 6. 4 39 bb) 39 6. 8 a friend was taken into the nest. 6.20 99 9 b>) 6.23 ” ” ” 6.30 a stranger was dropped into the water. 6.50 a friend %5 . 3 8. 5 a friend was taken into the nest. In this case two friends were thrown into the water and seven taken into the nest ; while six strangers were thrown into the water and four were taken into the nest ; all of these, however, were afterwards brought out again and thrown away. December 8.—Experimented with six friends and six strangers, beginning at 11.30 BEHAVIOUR TO INTOXICATED FRIENDS, At 11.30 a friend was carried to nest. 11.47 5 3 11.50 5 3 11.52 3 33 11.56 a friend was dropped into water. 11.58 a stranger “A 11.58 ; " 12. astranger was carried to nest. 12. 2 +) ” ” 12 3 29 9 ” 115 I then put four more of each, and as a friend or a stranger was carried off, replaced her by another. At 12.45 a friend to the water. 12.58 a stranger was dropped into the water, 1a friend to the nest. 1 9 3 1 > ” 1.58 os _ 1.59 “3 5 2.30 a stranger to the water. 2.30 PA Fe 2.35 a stranger to the nest. 2.42 a stranger to the water. 2.48 9 2.51 ” 2.52 ” ” 2.55 a friend to the nest. 2-55 a stranger to the water. 2,55 5 ” 12 116 BEHAVIOUR TO INTOXICATED FRIENDS. At 3. 2 a friend to the water. 3. 6 a stranger to the water. 3.12 a friend to the water. 3.15 99 bb) 3.16 a friend to the nest. 3.22 a stranger to the water 825s, i 3.25 a friend to the nest. 3.35 a stranger to the water. 3.50 a friend to the nest. 350° |, 4 Ail these ants appeared quite insensible. Altogether sixteen triends were taken to the nest and fivethrown into the water, while of the strangers only three were taken to the nest, and fifteen were thrown into the water. Moreover, as in the preceding observation, even the three strangers which were at first taken to the nest were soon brought out again and thrown away ; while this was not the case with any of the friends as far as we could ascertain, though we searched diligently for them also. In this case also all the intoxicated ants were motionless and apparently insensible. January 15.—Repeated the same experiment, beginning at 12.20. Up to7 P.M. not one of the intoxi- cated ants had been moved. At 8.20 we found a stranger in the water, at 9.30 another, and at the following morning a third. The others were untouched. January 17.—Repeated the same experiment, beginning at 1).30. BEHAVIOUR TO INTOXICATED FRIENDS. 117 At 12a friend was carried to the nest. 12.20 a stranger was dropped into the water. 12.34 a friend was carried to the nest. 12.40 a stranger was dropped into the water, 12.45 a friend was carried to the nest. 1 astranger + oe ] i GS water (Stopped observing till 2.) 2.30 a stranger was dropped into the water. 2.30 a stranger was carried to the nest. 4.10 ” ” ” 4,30 a friend 55 33 6.20 a stranger a water, 6.35 bP) bP] 9 Thus, then, the general results were that the ants removed forty-one friends and fifty-two strangers. Of the friends, thirty-two were carried into the nest and nine were thrown into the water. Of the strangers, on the contrary, forty-three were thrown into the water; only nine were taken into the nest, and seven of these were shortly afterwards brought out again and thrown away. Indeed,I fully believe that the other two were treated in the same manner, though we could not satisfy ourselves of the fact. But it was only by very close observation that the seven were detected, and the other two may well have escaped notice. It seems clear, therefore, that even in a condition of insensibility these ants were recognised by their friends, 118 BEHAVIOUR TO INTOXICATED FRIENDS. Tabular View.—Haperiments on Chloroformed and Intoxicated Ants. CHLOROFORMED ANTS. FRIENDS STRANGERS To | Unre- To | Unre- Water | moved C arried to Nest Water | moved Carried to Nest Sept. 10 ser 4 14 2 2 and brought out again 15 1 S00 2 2 and brought out again 29 4 Oct. 2 1 4 and brought out again 6 4 1 3 20 2 INTOXICATED ANTS. 1 Nov. 20 3 | Oilers Baia 22 2 ne 2 8 | In these cases some of the Ants had partly recovered in the following they were quite insensible. Dec. 1 ( 2 S03. 3 6 eee none brought all these out again brought out again 8 16 5 doe 3 15 eee none brought all these out again brought out again Jan. 15 a ae 4 300 3 1 17 4 doo |} 00 3 6 none brought one brought out again out again 30 1 119 CHAPTER VI. RECOGNITION OF FRIENDS. It has been already shown that with ants, as with bees, while the utmost harmony reigns between those belonging to the same community, all others are enemies. I have already given ample proof that a strange ant is never tolerated in a community. This of course implies that all the bees or ants of a community have the power of recognising one another, a most surprising fact, when we consider the shortness of their life and their immense numbers. It is calculated that in a single hive there may be as many as 50,000 bees, aud in the case of ants the numbers are still greater. In the large communities of Formica pratensis it is probable that there may be as many as from 400,000 to 500,000 ants, and in other cases even these large numbers are exceeded. If, however, astranger is put among the ants of another nest, she is at once attacked. On this point I have satisfied myself, as will be seen in the following pages, that the statements of Huber and others are perfectly correct. If, for instance, I introduced a stranger into one of my nests, say of Formica fusca ox 120 RECOGNITION OF FRIENDS. Lasius niger, she was at once attacked. Oueant would seize her by an antenna, another by a leg, and she was either dragged out of the nest or killed. Moreover, we have not only to deal with the faet that ants know all their comrades, but that they recog- nise them even after a lengthened separation. Huber mentions that some ants which he had kept in captivity having accidentally escaped, ‘met and recognised their former companions, fell to mutual caresses with their antenne, took them up by their mandibles, and led them to their own nests; they came presently in a crowd to seek the fugitives under and about the artificial ant-hill, and even ventured to reach the bell-glass, where they effected a complete desertion by carrying away successively all the ants they found there. In a few days the ruche was depopulated. These ants had remained. four months without any communication.’! This interesting state- ment has been very naturally copied by succeeding writers. See, for instance, Kirby and Spence’s ‘In- troduction to Entomology,’ vol. ii. p. 66, and Newport, ‘Trans. of the Entomological Society of London,’ vol. ii. p. 239. Forel, indeed, regards the movements observed by Huber as having indicated fear and surprise rather than affection ; though he is quite disposed to believe, from his own observations, that ants would recognise one another after a separation of several months. * Huber, p. 172. RECOGNITION OF FRIENDS. ri The observation recorded by Huber was made ‘casually, and he did not take any steps to test it by subsequent experiments. The fact, however, is of so much importance that I determined to make further observations on the subject. In the first place, I may repeat that I have satisfied myself by many experiments, that ants from one community introduced into another,—always be it understood of the same species,—are attacked, and either driven out or killed. It follows, therefore, that as within the nest the most complete harmony prevails—indeed, I have never seen a quarrel between sister ants—they must by some means recognise one another. When we consider their immense numbers this is sufficiently surprising ; but that they should recognise one another, as stated by Huber, after a separation of months, is still more astonishing. I determined therefore to repeat and extend his observations. Accordingly, on August 20, 1875, I divided a colony of Myrmica ruginodis, so that one half were in one nest, A, and the other half in another, B, and were kept entirely apart. On October 3, I put into nest B a stranger and an old companion from nest A. They were marked with a spot of colour. One of them immediately flew at the stranger; of the friend they took no notice. October 18.—At 10 a.m I put in a stranger and a 122 RECOGNITION OF FRIENDS friend from nest A. In the evening the former was killed, the latter was quite at home. October 19.—I put one ina small bottle with a friend from nest A. They did not show any enmity. I then put in a stranger; and one of them immediately began to fight with her. October 24,—I again put into the nest a stranger and a friend. The former was attacked, but not the latter. The following day I found the former almost dead, while the friend was all right. October 31.—I again put a stranger and a friend into the nest. The former was at once attacked; in this case the friend also was, for a moment, seized by the leg, but at once released again. On the following morning the stranger was dead, the friend was all right. November 7.—Again I put in a stranger and a friend. The former was soon attacked and eventually driven out; of the latter they did not seem to me to take any particular notice. I could see no signs of welcome, no gathering round a returned friend; but, on the other hand, she was not attacked. Again, I separated one of my colonies of Formica fusca into two halves on August 4, 1875, and kept them entirely apart. From time to time I put speci- mens from the one half back into the other. The de- tails of this experiment will be found in the Appendix. At first the friends were always amicably received, but after some months’ separation they were occasionally AFTER SEPARATION FOR NEARLY TWO YEARS. 123 attacked, as if some of the ants, perhaps the young ones, did not recognise them. Still they were never killed, or driven out of the nest, so that evidently when a mistake was made, it was soon recognised. No one who saw the different manner in which these ants and strangers were treated, could have the slightest doubt that the former were recognised as friends and the latter as enemies. The last three were put back on May 14, 1877, that is to say, after a separation of a year and nine months, and yet they were amicably re- ceived, and evidently recognised as friends ! These observations were all made on Formica fusca, and it is of course possible that other species would behave in a different manner. Indeed, in this respect Lastus flavus offers a sur- prising contrast to F’. fusca. I was anxious to see whether the colonies of this species, which are very numerous round my house, were in friendly relations with one another. With this view, I kept a nest of L. flavus for a day or two without food, and then gave them some honey, to which they soon found their way in numbers. I then put in the midst of them an ant of the same species from a neighbouring nest; the others did not attack, but, on the contrary, cleaned her —though, from the attention she excited and the numerous communications which took place between her and them, I am satisfied that they knew she was not one of themselves. After a few minutes she accom- panied some of the returning ants to the nest They 124 TREATMENT OF STRANGERS, did not drag nor apparently guide her; but she went with the rest freely. This I repeated several times with the same result. I then took four ants, two from a nest about 500 yards from the first in one direction, the other from an equal distance in another. In all cases the result was the same. I then got a few from a colony about half a mile off. These also were most amicably received, and in every case the stranger went of her own accord to the nest. One of the strangers was, indeed, dragged about half way to the entrance of the nest, but was then left free and might have run away if she had liked. She, however, after wandering about for half a minute, voluntarily entered the nest. In one or two eases the stranger ran as quickly and straight to the nest as if she had been there over and over again. This, I suppose, can only have been by scent; and cer- tainly no hounds in full cry could have pursued their game more directly or with less hesitation. In other cases, however, they were much longer before they went in. To satisfy myself that these facts were not owing to the nest having been taken from that of colonies or allies, I subsequently experimented with some ants of the same species from a nest in Hertfordshire ; and they also behaved in a similar manner. In one or two cases they seemed to be attacked, though so feebly that I could not feel sure aboutit; but in no case were the ants killed. The following fact surprised me still more. I put an ant (Aug. 13) at 9 a.m. on a spot where a number of TREATMENT OF STRANGERS. 125 Lasius flavus (belonging to one of my nests of domesti- cated ants) had been feeding some hours previously, though none were there, or, indeed, out at all, at the moment. The entrance to the nest was about eight inches off; but she walked straight to it and into the nest. A second wandered about for four or five minutes, and then went in; a third, on the contrary, took a wrong direction, and, at any rate for three-quarters of an hour, did not find the entrance. At that time, however, I did not ascertain what became of the specimens thus introduced into a strange community. JI thought it would be worth while to determine this, so I subsequently (1881) took six ants from one of my nests of Z. flavus, marked them, and introduced them into another nest of the same species. As in the preceding cases they entered quite readily ; but though they were not at first attacked, they were evidently recognised as strangers. The others ex- amined them carefully, and at length they were all driven out of the nest. Their greater readiness to enter a strange nest may perhaps be accounted for by the fact that, as a subterranean species their instinct always is to conceal themselves underground, whereas, I’. fusca, a hunting species, does not do so except to enter its own nest. How do these ants and bees recognise their com- panions? The difficulty of believing that in such populous communities every individual knows every other by sight, has led some entomologists to suppose 126 MODE OF RECOGNITION. that each nest had a sign or password. This was, for instance, the opinion of Gélieu, who believed that in each hive the bees had some common sign or password. As evidence of this, he mentions! that one of his hives had been for some days robbed by the bees from another: ‘et je désespérais de conserver cet essaim, lorsqu’un jour, sur le soir, je le vis fort inquiet, fort agité, comme s'il etit perdu sa reine. Les abeilles couraient en tout sens sur le devant et le tablier de la ruche, se flairant, se tatant mutuellement, comme si elles eussent voulu se dire quelque chose. C’était pour changer leur signe de reconnaissance, qu’elles changérent en effet pendant la nuit. Toutes les pillardes qui revinrent le lendemain, furent arrétées et tuées. Plu- sieurs échappérent aux gardes vigilantes qui défendaient Ventrée; elles avertirent sans doute les autres du danger qu’elles avaient couru, et que l’on ne pouvait plus piller impunément. Aucune de celles qui voulu- rent recommencer leurs déprédations ne pénétra dans la ruche, dont elles avaient fait leur proie, et qui prospéra merveilleusement.’ Dujardin doubts the explanation given by Gélieu. He thinks that the nest which was robbed was at that time queenless, and that the sudden change in the behaviour of the bees was due to their having acquired a queen. Burmeister, on the contrary, in his excellent ‘Manual of Entomology,’ says that ‘ the power of com- 1 Le Conservatewr des Aboilles, p. 143. SUPPOSED USE OF PASS SIGNS. 127 municating to their comrades what they purpose is peculiar to insects. Much has been talked of the so-called signs of recognition in bees, which is said to consist in recognising their comrades of the same hive by means of peculiar signs. This sign serves to pre- vent any strange bee from entering into the same hive without being immediately detected and killed. It, however, sometimes happens that several hives have the same signs, when their several members rob each other with impunity. In these cases the bees whose hive suffers most alter their signs, and then can im- mediately detect their enemy.’ ! Others, again, have supposed ants recognise one another by smell. Mr. McCook states that ants more or less soaked in water are no longer recognised by their friends, but, on the contrary, are attacked. Describing the following observation, he says : —‘ I was accidentally set upon the track of an interesting discovery. An ant fell into a box containing water placed at the foot of a tree. She remained in the liquid several moments and crept out. Immediately she was seized in a hostile manner, first by one, then another, then by a third: the two an- tennze and one leg were thus held. A fourth ant assaulted the middle thorax and petiole. The poor little bather was thus dragged helplessly to and fro for a long time, and was evidently ordained to death. ! Rurmeister’s Hntomology, p. 502. 2 Mound-making Ants of the Alleghanies, p. 280. 128 SUPPOSED RECOGNITION BY SCENT. Preseritly I took up the struggling heap. Two of the assailants kept their hold; one finally dropped, the other I could not tear loose, and so put the pair back upon the tree, leaving the doomed immersionist to her hard fate.’ After recording one or two other similar observa- tions, he adds:'—* The conclusion, therefore, seems warranted that the peculiar odour or condition by which the ants recognise each other was temporarily destroyed by the bath, and the individuals thus “ tainted” were held to be intruders, alien and enemy. This con- clusion is certainly unfavourable to the theory that any thing like an intelligent social sentiment exists among the ants. The recognition of their fellows is reduced to a mere matter of physical sensation or “ smell.”’ This conclusion does not, I confess, seem to me to be conclusively established. We can hardly suppose that each ant has a pecu- liar odour, and it seems almost equally difficult, con- sidering the immense number of ants’ nests, to suppose that each community has a separate and peculiar smell. Moreover, in a previous chapter I have recorded some: experiments made with intoxicated ants. It will be remembered that my ants are allowed to range over a table surrounded by a moat of water. Now, as already wentioned, out of forty-one intoxicated friends, thirty- two were carried into the nest and nine were thrown into the water; while out of fifty-two intoxicated 1 Mound-making Ants of the Alleghanies, p. £81. SUPPOSED USE OF A PASSWORD. 129 strangers two were taken into the nest and fifty were thrown into the water. I think it most probable that even these two were subsequently brought out and treated like the rest. It is clear, therefore, that in these species, and I believe in most, if not all others, the ants of a com- munity all recognise one another. The whole question is full of difficulty. It occurred to me, however, that experiments with pupze might throw some light on the subject. Although all the communities are deadly enemies, still if larvae or pupx from one nest are trans- ferred to another, they are tended with apparently as much care as if they really belonged to the nest. In ant-warfare, though sex is no protection, the young are spared, at least when they belong to the same species, Moreover, though the habits of ants are greatly changed if they are taken away from their nest and kept with only a few friends, still, under such circumstances, they will carefully tend any young who may be confided to them. Now if the recognition were individual—if the ants knew any one of their comrades, as we know our friends, not only from strangers, but from one another —then young ants taken from the nest as pup and restored after they had come to maturity would not be recognised as friends. On the other hand, if the recognition were effected by means of some signal or password, then the pup which were intrusted to ants from another nest would have the password, if any, of that nest; and not of their own. Hence in this case K 130 EXPERIMENTS WITH PUPAE. they would be amicably received in the nest from which their nurses had been taken, but not in their own. In the first place, therefore, I put, on September 2, 1877, some pupe from one of my nests of Formica fusca with a couple of ants from the same nest. On the 27th I put two of the ants, which in the meantime had emerged from these pupz, back into their own nest at 8.30 4.M., marking them with paint as usual. At 9 they seemed quite at home; at 9.30, ditto; at 10, ditto; and they were nearly cleaned. After that I could not distinguish them. On the 29th another ant came out of the pupa- state; and on October 1 at 7.45 I put her back into the nest. She seemed quite at home, and the others soon began to clean her. We watched her from time to time, and she was not attacked; but, the colour being removed, we could not recognise her after 9.30. On July 14 last year (1878) I put into a small glass some pupze from another nest of Formica fusca with two friends. On August 11 I put four of the young ants which had emerged from these pup into the nest. After the interval of an hour, I looked for them in vain. The door of the nest was closed with cotton-wool; so that they could not have come out; and if any were being attacked, I think we must have seen it. I believe, therefore, that in the meantime they had been cleaned. Still, as we did not actually watch them, I EXPERIMENTS WITH PUPA. 131 was not satisfied. I put in, therefore, two more at 5 p.m. At 5.30 they were all right; at 5.45, ditto, one being almost cleaned. At 6 one was all right: the other was no longer recognizable, having been quite cleaned. At 6.30 also one was quite at home; the other could not be distinguished. At 7 both had been completely cleaned. The following day I marked another, and put her in at 6 a.m. At 6.15 she was all right among the others, and also at 6.30, 7, 7.30, 8, and 9.30, after - which I could no longer distinguish her. Again, on the following day I put in another at 6.45 a.m. At 7 she was quite at home, and also at 7.15, 7.30, 8, and to 9.30, after which I did not watch her. To test the mode in which the ants of this nest would behave to a stranger, I then, though feeling no doubt as to the result, introduced one. The difference was very striking. The stranger was a powerful ant; atill she was evidently uncomfortable, started away from every ant she met, aud ran nervously about, trying to get out of the nest. She was, however, soon attacked. Again, on October 1 some pupx of Lasius niger were placed in a glass with five ants from the same nest. On December 8 I took three of the ants which had emerged from these pup, and at midday put them back into their old nest, having marked them by nick- K J 132 PUPH REMOVED FROM NEST, ing the claws. Of course, under these circumstances we could not watch the ants. I examined the nest, however, every half hour very carefully, and am satisfied that there was no fighting. The next morning there was no dead ant; nor was there a death in the nest for more than a fortnight. December 21.—Marked three more in the same manner, and put them in at 11.15 a.m. Looked at the usual intervals, but saw no fighting. The next morning there was no dead one outside the nest; but I subsequently found one of these ants outside, and nearly dead. I am, however, disposed to think that I had accidentally injured this ant. December 23.—Painted three, and put them in at 104.m. At 11 they were unmolested, 12 ditto, 1 ditto, 2 ditto, 3 ditto, 4 ditto, 5 ditto. At 3 I put in three strangers for comparison: two of them were soon attacked ; the other hid herself in a corner; but all three were eventually dragged out of the nest. I found no other dead ant outside the nest for some days. December 29.—Painted three more, and put them in at 10.304.m. At 11 they were unmolested, 12 ditto, 1 ditto, 2 ditto. During the afternoon they were once or twice attacked for a minute or two, but the ants seemed soon to perceive the mistake, and let them go again. The next morning I found one dead ant, but had no reason to suppose that she was one of the above three. The following morning there was again only one dead ant ortside the nest; she was the third of the AND RESTORED AFTER COMING TO MATURITY. 133 strangers put in on the 23rd, as mentioned above. Up to January 23 found no other dead one. January 3, 1879.—Painted three more, and put them in at 11.3U A.M. At 12 two were all right: we could not see the third ; but no ant was being attacked. 12 ditto. 1, all three are unmolested; 2 ditto; 5 ditto. As already mentioned, for some days there was no dead ant brought out of the nest. January 5.—Painted three more and put them in at 11.30 a.m. At 12 two were all right among the others; I could not find the third; but no ant was being attacked. 12.30 ditto, 1 ditto, 2 ditto, 4 ditto. On the following morning I found two of them all right among the others. There was no dead ant. January 13.—Painted three more and put them in at 12.30. At 1 they were allright. 2 ditto. 4, two were unmolested ; I could not see the third, but she was not being attacked. The next morning, when I looked at the nest, one was just being carried, not dragged, out. The ant carried her about 6 inches and then put her down, apparently quite unhurt. She soon returned into the nest, and seemed to be quite amicably re- ceived by the rest. Another one of the three also seemed quite at home. The third I could not see; but up to January 23 no dead one was brought out of the nest. January 19.—Marked the last three of these ants, and put them into the nest at 9.30 a.m. They were watched continuously up to 1. At that time two of 134 ANTS REMOVED AS PUFA, AND RESTORED them had been almost completely cleaned. One was attacked for about a minute soon after 11, and another a little later; but with these exceptions they were quite amicably received, and seemed entirely at home among the other ants. Thus every one of these thirt:; two ants was amic- ably received. These experiments, then, seem to prove that ants removed from a nest in the condition of pups, but tended by friends, if reintroduced into the parent nest, are recognised and treated as friends. Nevertheless the recognition does not seem to have been complete. In several cases the ants were certainly attacked, though only by one or two ants, not savagely, and only for a short time. It seemed as if, though recognised as friends by the great majority, some few, more ignorant or more suspicious than the rest, had doubts on the subject, which, however, in some manner still mysterious, were ere long removed. The case in which one of these marked ants was carried out of the nest may perhaps be explained by her having been supposed to be ill, in which case, if the malady is con- sidered to be fatal, ants are generally brought out of the nest. It now remained to test the result when the pups were confided to the care of ants belonging toa different nest, though, of course, the same species. I therefore took a number of pup out of some of my nests of Formica fusca and put them in small TO THE NEST AFTER COMING TO MATURITY. 135 giasses, with ants from another nest of the same species. Now, as already mentioned, if the recognition were effected by means of some signal or password, then, as we can hardly suppose that the larve or pupz would be sufficiently intelligent to appreciate, still less to remember it, the pupz which were intrusted to ants from another nest would have the password, if any, of that nest, and not of the one from which they had been taken. Hence, if the recognition were effected by some password or sign with the antennz, they would be amicably received in the nest from which their nurses had been taken, but not in their own. I will indicate the nests by the numbers in my note-book. On August 26 last year I put some pupe of Formica fusca from one of my nests (No. 36) with two workers from another nest of the same species. Two emerged from the chrysalis state on the 30th; and on September 2 I put them, marked as usual, into their old nest (No. 36) at 9.30 a.m. At 9.45 they seemed quite at home, and had already been nearly cleaned. At 10.15 the same was the case, and they were scarcely distinguishable. After that I could no longer make them out; but we watched the nest closely, and I think I can undertake to say that if they had been attacked we must have seen it. Another one of the same batch emerged on August 18, but was rather crippled in doing so. On the 21st I put her into the nest (No. 36). This ant was at once 136 ANTS REMOVED AS PUPA,-AND RESTORED attacked, dragged out of the nest, and dropped into the surrounding moat of water. Again, on July 14 last year (1878) I put some pup of Formica fusca from nest No. 36 into a glass with three ants of the same species from nest No. 60. On the 22nd I put an ant from one of these pups into her old nest (No. 36) at 9.30 a.m. She was at- tacked. At 10 she was being dragged about. 10.30 ditto. I regretted she was not watched longer. August 8.—Put another ant which had emerged from one of these pupz into her old nest (No. 36) at 7.45 A.M. At 8 she seemed quite at home among the others. 8.15 ditto, 8.30 ditto, 9 ditto, 9.30 ditto. August 9.—Put two other young ants of this batch into their old nest (No. 36) at 7 a.m. At 7.15 they were all right. At 7.30 one of them was being dragged by a leg, but only, I think, to bring her under shelter, and was then let go. Young ants of this spe- cies, when the nest is disturbed, are sometimes dragged to a place of safety in this way. At 8.30 they were all right and nearly cleaned. After this I could not distinguish them; but if they had been attacked, we must have seen it. August 11.—Put in another one as before at 8.30 AM. At 8.45 she was unmolested. At 9 she was dragged by a leg, like the last, but not for long; and at 9.30 she was quite comfortable amongst the others. 10 ditto, 10.45 ditto, 12 ditto, 5 ditto. August 24.—Put in the last two ants of this lot TO THE NEST AFTER COMING TO MATURITY. 137 as before at 9.15 a.m. At 9.30 they were unmolested. 9.45 ditto. At 10 they were almost cleaned. At 10.30 I could only distinguish one ; and she had only a speck of colour left. She appeared quite at home ; and though I could no longer distinguish the other, I must have seen it if she had been attacked. Thus, then, out of seven ants of this batch put back into their old nest, six were amicably received. On the other hand, I put one into nest No. 60, from which the three nurses were taken. She was introduced into the nest at 8.15 A.M., and was at once attacked. 8.45, she was being dragged about. 9 ditto, 9.15 ditto, 9.30 ditto. Evidently therefore she was not treated as a friend. Again, on July 14, 1878, I put some pupz of Formica fusca from nest No. 60 with three ants from nest No. 36. On August 5 at 4 p.M.I put an ant which had emerged from one of these pupz, into her old nest (No. 60). At 4.15 she seemed quite at home. They were already cleaning her ; and by 4.30 she was no longer distinguishable. We watched the nest, however, care- fully for some time; and I feel sure she was not attacked. August 6.—Put another of this batch into nest No. 60 at 7.15 4.mM. At 7.30 she was not attacked. At 8, one of the ants was carefully cleaning her. At 8.15 she was quite at home among the others. At 8.30 ditto; she was nearly cleaned. 9.30 ditto. August 8.—Put in another as before at 7.45. At 8 she was allright. 8.30 ditto, 9.30 ditto, 9.45 ditto. 138 ANTS REMOVED AS PUPA, AND RESTORED August 9.—Put in another as before at 7 a.m. At 7.30 she is quite at home among the others, and already nearly cleaned. At 8I could no longer distinguish her ; but certainly no ant was being attacked. 9 ditto. August 11.—Put in another as before at 8 A.M. At 8.15 she was quite at home. 8.30 ditto, 9 ditto, 9.30 ditto, 10 ditto, 12.30 ditto. August 13.—Lastly, I put in the remaining young ant as before at 7 a.M. At 7.15 she was unmolested. At 7.30 ditto and nearly cleaned. At 8 I could no longer distinguish her; but no ant was neing attacked. Thus, then, as in the preceding experiment, these six ants when reintroduced into the nest from which they had been taken as pupz, were received as friends. On the other hand, on August 5 I put a young ant of the same batch into nest No. 36, from which the three nurses had been taken. She was introduced at 11 and was at once attacked. At11.30 she was being dragged about, and shortly after was dragged out of the nest. I then introduced a second; but she was at once attacked like the first. August 22.—I put some pup of Formica fusca from nest No. 64 under the charge of three ants from nest No. 60. By September 7 several young ones had emerged. I put two of them into nest No. 64 at 8.15 A.M. They were amicably received, as in the pre- ceding experiments, and the ants began to clean them. At 8.30 they were allright. 8.45 ditto. At 9 they had been completely cleaned, so that I could not distinguish TO THE NEST AFTER COMING TO MATURITY. 139 them; but there was no fighting going on in the nest. On the same day, at 9.45 a.m., I put into nest 64 two more as before. At 10 they were both quite at home among the other ants. 10.15 ditto, 10.30 ditto, 11 ditto, 12 ditto, 1 ditto. I then put in a stranger; and she was at once fiercely attacked. September 8.—Put in two more of the ants which had emerged from the pupz, as before, at 9.30 A.M. At 9.45 they were all right. 10 ditto, 10.30 ditto, 11 ditto, 11.30 ditto, 12 ditto, 1 ditto. On the other hand, on September 14, I put one of these ants in the same manner into nest No. 60 at 6.30 A.M. She was at once attacked. At 6.45 she was being dragged about byanantenna. 7 ditto. At 7.30 she was by herself in one corner. At 8.30 she was again being dragged about. 9.30 ditto. The difference, therefore, was unmistakable. Once more, on July 29 I put some pupex of Formica fusca from out of doors under the charge of three ants from nest No. 36. August 3.—Several had come out, and I put two of them into the nest of their nurses (No. 36) at 2 P.M. Both were at once attacked. At 2.45 they were being dragged about. 3 ditto. 3.30 one was being dragged -about. 4, both were being attacked. Eventually one was turned out of the nest. The other I lost sight of. August 4.—Put two more of this batch into nest No. 36, at 12.30. One was at once attacked. 1, one 140 YOUNG ANTS RECOGNISED EVEN was being dragged about by an antenna. 2.30, both were being attacked. At 2.45 one was dragged out of the nest. I then put back one of the old ones; as might have been expected, she was received quite amicably. I then tried the same experiment with another species, Lasius niger. I took some pupe from two of my nests, which I knew not to be on friendly terms, and which I will call 1 and 2, and confided each batch to three or four ants taken from the other nest. When they had come to maturity I introduced them into the nests as before. They were taken from their nest on September 14; and the results were as follows. Pupz from nest 1 confided to ants from nest 2. September 20.—Put one of the young ones into nest 2 at 7.15 a.m. Several at once threatened her. At 7.25 one of the ants seized her by an antenna, and ‘ began dragging her about. 7.30, she was still being dragged about. 8, ditto. 8.15, she was now being dragged about by three ants. 8.30, she was still attacked. 9, ditto. At 9.15 she was dragged out of the nest. September 23.—Put two of the young ants into nest 1 at 9.15 a.m. One was at once attacked, and the other a few minutes afterwards. 9.45, both were attacked. 10, ditto. One was now dead and hanging on to a leg of assailant. 10.15 ditto. 10.45, both were still being dragged about. At 11 a.M. I put into nest 2 three more very young WHEN REMOVED IN THE STATE OF PUPH. 141 ones. At 11.10 one was attacked. At 11.20 all three were being viciously attacked, and yet one was nearly cleaned. At 12 one was being attacked, one was alone in a corner, the other we could not find. At 12.10 one was dragged out of the nest and then abandoned, on which, to my surprise, she ran into the nest again, which no old ant would have done. She was at once again seized by an antenna. At 12.30 she was still being dragged about; the second was being cleaned. In this instance, therefore, I think two out of the three were eventually accepted as inmates of the nest. September 25.—Put two of the young ones into nest 1 at 2.30 P.M. At 2.45 one was attacked, but not viciously. 3 ditto, 3.15 ditto. No notice was taken of the other, though several ants came upand examined her. 3.30, the first was not attacked, the second was almost cleaned. 4, the first has been again attacked, but not -viciously, and moreover has been partly cleaned. The second was evidently received as a friend, and was almost cleaned. 4.30, they are both comfortably among the others and are almost clean. At 5 I could no longer distinguish them. I now pass to the other batch, namely, pupx from nest 2 with ants from nest 1. September 25.—Put three of the young ants into nest 1 at 9.30 a.m. At 9.45 two were attacked, the third was by herself. 10 ditto. At 10.15 one made her escape from the nest. At 10.20 the third was attacked. At 10.30 one of them was dragged out of the nest, and 142 YOUNG ANTS RECOGNISED then abandoned. At 10.50 the third also was dragged out of the nest. I then put two of these ants and a third young one into nest 2. At 11.15 a.m. they seemed quite happy; but at 11.30 two were being dragged about; the third, who was very young, was, on the contrary, being care- fully cleaned. At 12 this last one was undistinguish- able ; of the other two, one was being attacked, the second was taken no notice of, though several ants came up toher. At 12.5 the first was dragged out of the nest and then abandoned; the second was being carefully cleaned. This went on till 12.20, when the paint was entirely removed. September 27.—I put in three more of these young ants into nest 1, at 7.45 aM. At8 o'clock they seemed quite at home among the other ants. A few minutes after, one was being held by a leg ; the other two seemed quite at home. At 8.30 one was almost cleaned, the . other I could not see. At 9 two of them were quite at home, but I could not see the third. At 9.30 they were both nearly cleaned ; and after that we were no longer able to distinguish them. Thinking the results might be different if the ants were allowed to become older before being returned into their nests, I made no further observations with these ants for two months. I then took two of the ants which had emerged from the pupz separated on Septem- ber 20, and which had been brought up by ants from nest 2, and on November 22 I put them back EVEN WHEN REMOVED AS PUFA. 143 at 12 a.M. in their old nest (that is to say, in nest 1), having marked them as usual, with paint. They showed no signs of fear, but ran about among the other ants with every appearance of being quiteat home. At 12.15ditto. At 12.30 one was being cleaned. At 12.45 both were being cleaned ; and by 1 o’clock they could scarcely be distinguished from the other ants. There had not been the slightest symptoms of hostility. After this hour we could no longer identify them; but the nest was carefully watched throughout the afternoon, and I think I can undertake to say that they were not attacked. When we left off watching, the nest was enclosed ina box. The next morning I examined it carefully, to see if there were any dead bodies. This was not the case; and I am satisfied, therefore, that neither of these two ants was killed. To test these ants, I then, on November 24, at 8.30 a.M., put into the nest two ants from nest 2. At 8.40 one was attacked ; the other had hid herself away in a corner. At 9.15 both of the ants were being dragged about. At 9.35 one was dragged out of the nest and then released, and the other a few minutes afterwards. After watch- ing them for some time to see that they remained out- side, I restored them to their own nest. The contrast, therefore, was very marked. Again, on November 25, I took two ants which had emerged from pupe belonging to nest 2, removed on September 20, and brought up by ants from nest 1, and put them back into their old nest at 2 P.M. They 144 YOUNG ANTS RECOGNISED were watched continuously until 4 P.M., but were not attacked, nor eventhreatened. The following morning one of them was quite well, the other one we could not distinguish ; she had probably been cleaned. If she had been killed, we must have found her dead body. I then at 10 am. put in two more. At 10.30 one of them was attacked for a moment, but only for a moment. With this exception neither of them was attacked until 2 o’clock, when one of them was again seized and dragged about for a minute or two, but then released again. We continued watching them till half-past 4, when they seemed quite at home amongst the others. On the other hand a stranger, put in as a test at 12, was at once’ attacked. It was curious, however, that although she was undoubtedly attacked, yet at the very same time another ant began to clean her. The next morning we found one ant, and only one, in the box outside the nest; and this turned out to be the stranger of yesterday. She had been almost cleaned ; but there were one or two small particles of paint still remaining, so that there could be no doubt of her identity. The next day, November 27, I put in three more of the ants derived from these pupe at 10 a.m. At 10.30 they were all right, running about amongst the others. At 11 o’clock the same was the case; but whilst I was looking again shortly afterwards, one of them was seized by an antenna and dragged a little WHEN REMOVED AS PUPA. 145 way, but released again in less than a minute. Shortly afterwards one of the others was also seized, but let go again almost immediately. At one o’clock they were all right, and also at two. They had, however, in the meantime been more than once threatened, and even momentarily seized, though they were never dragged about as strangers would have been. At three o’clock I found one of them dead; but I think I must have accidentally injured her, and I do not believe that she was killed by the other ants, though I cannot speak quite positively about it. The other two were quite at home, and had been partly cleaned. At six one of them was running about comfortably amongst the rest ; the other I could not distinguish ; but certainly no ant was being attacked. November 28.—I put in the last two ants from the above-mentioned batch of pupw at noon. Like the preceding, these ants were occasionally threatened, and even sometimes attacked for a moment or two; but the other ants soon seemed to find out their mistake, and on the whole they were certainly treated as friends, the attacks never lasting more than a few moments. One of them was watched at intervals of half an hour until 5 p.m.; the other we could not distinguish after 3 p.M., the paint having been licked off; but we should certainly have observed it had she been attacked. On the whole, then, all the thirty-two ants belonging to Formica fusca and Lasius niger, removed from L 146 SISTER ANTS RECOGNISED their nest as pups, attended by friends and restored tc their own nest, were amicably received. What is still more remarkable, of twenty-two ants belonging to F’. fusca, removed as pup, attended by strangers, and returned to their own nest, twenty were amicably received. As regards one I am doubtful; the last was crippled in coming out of the pupa-case; and to this perhaps her unfriendly reception may have been due. Of the same number of Lasius niger developed in the same manner from pupz tended by strangers belonging to the same species, and then returned into their own nest, nineteen were amicably received, three were attacked, and about two I feel doubtful. On the other hand, fifteen specimens belonging to the same two species, removed as pup, tended by strangers belonging to the same species, and then put into the strangers’ nest, were all attacked. The results may be tabulated as follows :— Pupe brought up by friends | Pups brought up by strangers. and replaced in their own nest. Put in own nest, Put in strangers’ nest. IMMA IOS 5 A oo WW Te 15 Received amicably . 33 37 0 The differences cannot be referred to any difference of temperament in different nests. The specimens of F. fusca experimented with in August and September last were taken principally from two nests, numbered respectively 36 and 60. Now, while nest 36, in most 1 I do not feel sure avout three of these. EVEN IF BROUGHT UP SEPARATELY. 147 cases, amicably received ants bred from its own pups but tended by ants from 60, it showed itself fiercely hostile to ants from pupze born in nest 60, even when these had been tended by ants from nest 36. Nest 60, again, behaved in a similar manner ; amicably receiving, as a general rule, its own young, even when tended - by ants from 36; and refusing to receive ants born in nest 36, even when tended by specimens from nest 60. These experiments seem to indicate that ants of the same nest do not recognise one another by any pass- word. On the other hand, they seem to show that if ants are removed from a nest in the pupa-state, tended by strangers, and then restored, some at least of their rela- tives are puzzled, and for a time doubt their claim to con- sanguinity. I say some, because while strangers under the circumstances would have been immediately at- tacked, these ants were in every case amicably received by the majority of the colony, and it was sometimes several hours before they came across one who did not recognise them. In all these experiments, however, the ants were taken from the nest as pup, and though I did not think the fact that they had passed their larval existence in the nest could affect the problem, still it might do so. I determined therefore to separate a nest before the young were born, or even the eggs laid, and then ascertain the result. Accordingly I took one of my nests of fF. fusca, which I began watching on Sept. 13, 1878, and which contained two queens, and on February 8, L2 148 SISTER ANTS RECOGNISED 1879, divided it into halves, which I will call A and B, so that there were approximately the same number of ants with a queen in each division. At this season, of course, the nest contained neither young nor even eggs. During April both queens began to lay eggs. On July 20 I took a number of pupz from each division and placed each lot in a separate glass, with two ants from the same division. On August 30 I took four ants from the pupz bred in B, and one from those in A (which were not quite so forward), and after marking them as usual with paint, put the B ants into nest A, and the A ant into nest B. They were received amicably and soon cleaned. Two, indeed, were once attacked for a few moments, but soon released. On the other hand, I put two strangers into nest A, but they were at once driven out. For facility of observa-: tion I placed each nest in a closed box. On the 31st I carefully examined the nests and also the boxes in which I placed them. I could only distinguish one of the marked ants, but there were no dead ants either in the nests or boxes. I carefully examined the box in the same way for several successive mornings, but there was no dead ant. If there had been I must have found the body, and I am sure, therefore, that these ants were not attacked. Again, on August 31 I put two more of the ants which had emerged from the pupz taken out of nest B, and nursed by ants from that nest, into nest A at. EVEN IF BROUGHT UP SEPARATELY. 149 10 am At 10.30 a.M. they were quite comfortable amongst the others. At 11 a.m. I looked again and they seemed quite at home, as also at 11.30 A.M., after which for some time I looked every hour, and they were never attacked. The next morning I found them peaceably among the other ants. On September 15 I put three of the ants which had emerged from the pupe taken out of nest A, and nursed by ants from that nest, and put them into nest B at 1.30 p.m. They seemed to make themselves quite at home. I looked again at 2.30 P.m., with the same result. At 3.30 p.m. I could only find two, the third having no doubt been cleaned, but no ant was being attacked. At 5.30 p.m. they were no longer distin- guishable, but if any one was being attacked we must have seen it. The next morning they all seemed quite peaceful, and there was no dead ant in the box. I looked again on the 17th and 19th, but could not distinguish them. As, however, there was no dead ant, they certainly had not been killed. I then put in a stranger; she was soon attacked and driven out of the nest—showing that, as usual, they would not tole- rate an ant whom they did not recognise as in some way belonging to the community. Again, on April 10, 1881, I divided a two-queened nest of Formica fusca, leaving a queen in each half. At that time no eggs had yet been laid, and of course there were no larve or pupe. In due course both queens laid eggs, and young ants were brought up in 150 RECOGNITION NOT INDIVIDUAL OR PERSONAL, each half of the nest. I will call the two halves as before A and B. On August 15, at 9 a.m., I put three of the young ants from A into B, and three from B into A. At 9.30 A.M. none were attacked, 10 a.m. ditto, 10.30 A.M. ditto. One was being cleaned; 12 a.m. ditto, 2 P.M. ditto. In fact, they seemed quite at home with the other ants. The next morning I was unable to recog- nise them, the paint having been entirely removed. The ants were all peaceably together in the nest, and there were no dead ones either in the nest or in the outer box. It is evident, therefore, that they had been treated as friends. August 17.—I put in three more from B into A at noon. At 12.30 p.m. they were with the other ants; at 1 P.M., ditto, at 2 p.m. ditto, at 3 P.M. ditto, at 5 p.m. ditto. The following morning I was still able to recognise them, though most of the paint had been removed. They also were evidently treated as part of the community. September 19.—Put in three more from A into B at 8.30 a.m. I looked at them at intervals of half an hour, but none of them were attacked. Next morning there was no ant outside the nest, nor had any been killed. October 10.—Put in three more at 7 a.M., and looked at intervals of an hour. They were not at- tacked, and evidently felt themselves among friends. The next morning I was still able to recognise two. NOR DUE TO THE USE OF A PASSWORD. 151 There was no dead ant either in the nest or the outer box. Lastly, on October 15, I put in four more at 7 4.M., and watched them all day at short intervals. They exhibited no sign of fear, and were never attacked. In fact, they made themselves quite at home, and were evidently, like the preceding, recognised as friends. For the sake of comparison at noon I again put in a stranger. Her behaviour was in marked contrast. The preceding ants seemed quite at home, walked about peaceably among the other ants, and made no attempt to leave the nest. The stranger, on the contrary, ran uneasily about, started away from any ant she met, and made every effort to get out of the nest. After she had three times escaped from the nest, I put her back with her own friends. Thus, then, when a nest of Formica fusca was divided early in spring, and when there were no young, the ants produced in each half were in twenty-eight cases all received as friends. In no case was there the slightest trace of enmity. These observations seem to me conclusive as far as they go, and they are very surprising. In the previous experiments, though the results were similar, still the ants experimented with had been brought up in the nest, and were only removed after they had become pupe. It might therefore be argued that the ants having nursed them as larve, recognized them when they came to maturity ; and though this would cer- 152 MODE OF RECOGNITION. tainly be in the highest degree improbable, it could not be said to be impossible. In the present case, however, the old ants had absolutely never seen the young ones until the moment when, some days after arriving at maturity, they were introduced into the nest; and yet in twenty-one cases they were undoubt- edly recognised as belonging to the community. It seems to me, therefore, to be established by these experiments that the recognition of ants is not personal or individual; that their harmony is not due to the fact that each ant is individually acquainted with every other member of the community. At the same time, the fact that they recognise their friends even when intoxicated, and that they know the young born in their own nest even when they have been brought out of the chrysalis by strangers, seems to indicate that the recognition is not effected by means of any sign or password. 153 CHAPTER VII. POWER OF COMMUNICATION. THE Social Hymenoptera, according to Messrs. Kirby and Spence,! ‘have the means of communicating to each other information of various occurrences, and use a kind of language which is mutually understood, . . . and is not confined merely to giving intel- ligence of the approach or absence of danger; it is also co-extensive with all their other occasions for communicating their ideas to each other.’ Huber assures us as regards Ants? that he has ‘frequently seen the antenne used on the field of battle to intimate approaching danger, and to ascertain their own party when mingled with the enemy; they are also employed in the interior of the ant-hill to apprise their companions of the presence of the sun, so favourable to the development of the larve, in their excursions and emigrating to indicate their route, in their recruitings to determine the time of departure,’ &e. Elsewhere also he says* ‘that should an Ant fall in with any of her associates from the nest they put her in the right way by the contact of their antenne.’ 1 Introduction to Entomology, ii. p 50. 2 Loe, cit. p. 206, * Zoo, cit. p. 167. 164 STATEMENTS OF PREVIOUS AUTHORS. These statements are most interesting; and it is much to be regretted that he has not given us in detail the evidence on which they rest. In another passage, indeed, he himself says,' ‘If they have a language, I cannot give too many proofs of it.’ Unfortunately, however, the chapter which he devotes to this impor- tant subject is very short, and occupied with general statements rather than with the accounts of the par- ticular experiments and observations on which those statements rest. Nor is there any serious attempt to ascertain the nature, character, and capabilities of this antennal language. Even if by motions of these organs Ants and Bees can caress, can express love, fear, anger, &e., it does not follow that they can narrate facts or describe localities The facts recorded by Kirby and Spence are not more explicit. It is therefore disappointing to read in the chapter especially devoted to this subject, that, as regards the power possessed by Ants and Bees to com~ municate and receive information, ‘it is only necessary to refer you to the endless facts in proof, furnished by almost every page of my letters on the history of Ants and of the Hive Bee. I shall therefore but detain you for a moment with an additional anecdote or two, especially with one respecting the former tribe, which is valuable from the celebrity of the narrator.’ The first of these anecdotes refers to a Beetle _Ateuchus pilularius) which, having made for the 1 Loe, cit. p. 206. HUBER, KIRBY AND SPENCE. 155 reception of its eggs a pellet of dung too heavy for it to move, ‘repaired to an adjoining heap and soon re- turned with three of his companions. All four now applied their united strength to the pellet, and at length succeeded in pushing it out, which being done, the three assistant Beetles left the spot and returned to their own quarters.’ This observation rests on the authority of an anonymous German artist ; and though we are assured that he was a ‘man of strict veracity,’ I am by no means satisfied that his explanation of what took place ig correct. M. Fabre, in his interesting ‘Souvenirs Entomologiques,’ records a similar observation, but explains it in another manner, and thus places the facts in a very different light. The second case is related by Kalm, on the authority of Dr. Franklin, but again does not seem to me to justify the conclusions drawn from it by Messrs. Kirby and Spence. Dr, Franklin having found a number of ants ina jar of treacle, shook them out and suspended the jar ‘ by a string from the ceiling. By chance one ant remained, which, after eating its fill, with some diffi- culty found its way up the string, and, thence reaching the ceiling, escaped by the wall to its nest. In less than half an hour a great company of ants sallied out of their hole, climbing the ceiling, crept along the string into the pot and began to eat again; this they continued until the treacle was all consumed, one swarm running up the string while another passed 156 KIRBY AND SPENCE. down It seems indisputable that the one ant had in this instance conveyed news of the booty te his com- rades, who would not otherwise have at once directed their steps in a body to the only accessible route.’ ' Elsewhere, Messrs. Kirby and Spence say :?—‘ If you scatter the ruins of an ants’ nest in your apartment, you will be furnished with another proof of their language. The ants will take a thousand different paths, each going by itself, to increase the chance of discovery ; they will meet and cross each other in all directions, and perhaps will wander long before they can find a spot convenient for their reunion. No sooner does any one discover a little chink in the floor through which it can pass below than it returns to its companions, and, by means of certain motions of its antennze, makes some of them comprehend what route they are to pursue to find it, sometimes even accompanying them to the spot; these, in their turn, become the guides of others, till all know which way to direct their steps.’ Here, however, Messrs. Kirby and Spence do not sufficiently distinguish between the cases in which the ants were guided, from those in which they were directed to the place of safety. It is obvious, however, that the power of communication implied in the latter case is much greater than in the former. A short but very interesting paper by Dujardin on this subject is contained in the ‘ Annales des Sciences’ for 1852. He satisfied himself that some bees which 1 Lov. cit. p. 422. ? Introd, to Entomology, vol. ii p. 6. DUJARDIN. 157 came to honey put out by him for the purpose ‘avaient dé recevoir dans la ruche un avertissement porté par quel- ques-unes de celles qui étaient venues isolément, soit 4 dessein, soit par hasard.’ That no doubt might re- main, he tried the following experiment, which he says, “me parait tout-d-fait concluante. Dans l’épaisseur dun mur latéral 4 18 métres de distance des ruches A et B, se trouve une niche pratiquée, suivant usage du pays, pour constater la mitoyenneté, et recouverte par un treillage et par une treille, et cachée par diverses plantes grimpantes. J’y introduisis, le 16 novembre, une soucoupe avec du sucre légérement humecté; puis jallai présenter une petite baguette enduite de sirop 4 une abeille sortant dela ruche. Cette abeille s’étant cramponnée 4 la baguette pour sucer le sirop, je la transportai dans la niche sur le sucre, ow elle resta cing ou six minutes jusqu’é ce qu’elle se fut bien gorgée ; elle commenga alors 4 voler dans la niche, puis deca et dela devant le treillage, la téte toujours tournée vers la niche, et enfin elle prit son vol vers la ruche, ov elle rentra. ‘Un quart d’heure se passa sans qu'il revint une seule abeille 4 la niche; mais, 4 partir de cet instant, elles vinrent successivement au nombre de trente, ex- plorant la localité, cherchant l’entrée de la niche qui avait da leur étre indiquée, et ot l’odorat ne pouvait nullement les guider, et, 4 leur tour vérifiant avant de retourner 4 la ruche, les signes qui leur feraient re- trouver cette précieuse localité ou qui leur permet- 158 FOREL, traient de l’indiquer 4 d’autres. Tous les jours suivants les abeilles de la ruche A vinrent plus nombreuses 4 la niche ov j’avais soin de renouveler le sucre humecté, et pas une seule de la ruche B n’eut le moindre soupcon de l’existence de ce trésor et ne vint voler de ce coté. Il était facile, en effet, de constater que les premiéres se dirigeaient exclusivement de la ruche 4 Ja niche, et réciproquement.’ It is of course clear from these observations thav the ants and bees accompanied their fortunate friends to the stores of food which they had discovered, but this really does not in itself imply the possession of any great intelligence. That ants and bees have a certain power of com- munication cannot, indeed, be doubted. Several striking cases are mentioned by M. Forel. For in- stance, on one occasion an army of Amazon ants (Polyergus rufescens) was making an expedition to attack a nest of F. rufibarbis. They were not, how- ever, quite acquainted with the locality. At length it was discovered :—‘ Aussitét,’ he observes, ‘ un nouveau signal fat donné, et toutes les amazones s’élancérent dans cette direction.’ On another occasion he says :— ‘Je mis un gros tas de 7’. cwspitum dune variété de grande taille 4 un décimétre d’un des nids d'une coionie de Pheidole pallidula. En un clin d’eil Valarme fut répandue, et des centaines de Pheidole se jetérent au-devant de l’ennemi.’ The species of Camponotus, when alarmed, ‘ non FOREL. 159 seulement se frappent vivement et 4 coups répétés les uns les autres, mais en méme temps ils frappent le sol deux ou trois fois de suite avec leur abdomen, et répétent cet acte 4 de courts intervalles, ce qui pro- duit un bruit trés marqué qu’on entend surtout bien lorsque le nid est dans un tronce d’arbre.’ ! It would even seem, according to M. Forel, that some species understand the signs of others, Thus F sanguinea, he says,? is able to seize ‘Vinstant ot les pratensis se communiquent le signal de la déroute, et elles savent s’apprendre cette découverte les unes aux autres avec une rapidité incroyable. Au moment méme ow |’on voit les pratensis se jeter les unes contre les autres en se frappant de quelques coups rapides, puis cesser toute résistance et s’enfuir en masse, on voit aussi les sanguvnea se jeter tout-d-coup au milieu d’elles, sans la plus petite retenue, mordant 4 droite et a4 gauche comme des Polyergus, et arrachant des cocons de toutes les pratensis qui en portent.’ M. Forel is of opinion (p. 364) that the different species differ much in their power of communicating with one another, Thus, though Polyergus rufescens is rather smaller than F. sanguinea, it is generally victorious, because the ants of this species understand one another more quickly than those of F. sanguinea. These statements are extremely interesting, and certainly appear to imply considerable intelligence. If, however, his inferences are correct, and the social 1 Loe. cit. p, 355. 2 Loe. ott. p. 359. 160 CONDITIONS OF THE PROBLEM. Hymenoptera are really so highly gifted, it ought not to be necessary for us to rely on accidental observa- tions ; we ought to be able to test them by appropriate experiments. Those which I have made with reference to bees will be described in a subsequent chapter. Every one knows that if an ant or a bee in the course of her rambles has found a supply of food, a number of others will soon make their way to the store. This, however, does not necessarily imply any power of de- scribing localities. A very simple sign would suffice, and very little intelligence is implied, if the other ants merely accompany their friend to the treasure which she has discovered. On the other hand, if the ant or bee can describe the locality, and send her friends to the food, the case is very different. This point, therefore, seemed to me very important; and I have made a number of observations bearing on it. The following may be taken as a type of what hap- pens under such circumstances. On June 12, 1874, I put a Lasius niger, belonging to a nest which I had kept two or three days without food, to some honey. She fed as usual, and then was returning to the nest, when she met some friends, whom she proceeded to feed. When she had thus distributed her stores, she returned alone to the honey, none of the rest coming with her. When she had asecond time laid in a stock of food, she agam in the same way fed several ants on her way towards the nest ; but this time five of those SOME SPECIES MORE COMMUNICATIVE THAN OTHERS, 161 so fed returned with her to the honey. In due course these five would no doubt have brought others, and se the number at the honey would have increased. Some species, however, act much more in association than others—Lasius niger, for instance, much more than Formica fusca. in March 1877 I was staying at Arcachon. It was a beautiful and very warm spring day, and numerous specimens of Formica fusca (Pl. I, fig. 3) were coursing about on the flagstones in front of our hotel. At about 10.45 a.m. I put a raisin down before one of them. She immediately began licking it, and continued till 11.2 a.m., when she went off almost straight to her nest, the entrance to which was about twelve feet away. In a few minutes she came out again, and reached the fruit, after a few wander- ings, at about 11.18 a.m. She fed till 11.30 a.., when she returned once more tw the nest. At 11.45 another ant accidentally found the fruit. I imprisoned her. At 11.50 the first returned, and fed till 11.56, when she went off to the nest. On the way she met and talked with three ants, none of whom, however, came to the fruit. At 12.7 she returned, again alone, to the fruit. On the following day I repeated the same experi- ment. The first ant went backwards and forwards between the raisin and the nest for several hours, but only six others found their way to it. M 162 EXPERIMENT WITH FORMICA FUSCA, The details of this observation will be found in the Appendix. Again, on July 11, 1875, I put out some pupa in a saucer, and at 5.55 P.M. they were found by a F. fusca, who as usual carried one off to the nest. At 6 p.M. she returned and took another. Again 6. Sons nn PrP & ~~ a e =" i=) EXPERIMENTS WITH MYRMICA AND LASIUS. 163 At 6.31 P.M. she returned and took another. Again 6.33 9 7 6.35 ” ” 6.36 ” ” 6.37 ” 99 6.38 ” ” 6.40 ” ” 6.41 ” ” 6.45 ” ” 6.47 9 ) 6.49 ” ” §.50 ” ” 6.5] ” 6.52 ” % 6.53 9 9 6.55 9 9 6.56 %3 ” 6.57 9 ” 7. 0 ” ” % 1 ” ” 7. 2 99 ” ten6 s0 f After these 45 visits, she came no more till 8 P.M.3 but when I returned at 10 p.m. I found all the pupa gone. During the time she was watched, however, she brought no other ant to assist. I also made similar experiments with Myrmica ruginodis and Lastus niger, imprisoning (as before) all ants that came. except the marked ones, and with m 2 164 EXPERIMENTS TO TEST similar results. The details were given in the Appendix to the earlier editions, but have now been omitted to make way for other matter. I then tried the following experiment :— In figure 3, a is the ants’ nest, 0 the door of the nest. M is the section of a pole on which the whole apparatus is supported. B is a board 2 feet long; C, D, E, and F are slips Fig. 3. of glass connected with the board B by narrow strips of paper G, H, I K is a movable strip of paper, 14 inch long, j] connecting the glass F with the strip H; | and 1 is another movable strip of paper, as nearly as possible similar, connecting Handi. On each of the slips of glass c and F I put several hundred larve of L. \\||| flavus. The object of the larvee on © was to ascertain whether, under such circum- > gtances, other ants would find the larve acci- dentally ; and I may say at once that none did so. I then put an ant (a), whom I had imprisoned overnight, to the larve on F. She took one, and, knowing her way, went straight home over the bridge K and down the strip H. Now it is obvious that by always causing the marked ant (a) to cross the bridge K on a particular piece of paper, and if at other times the papers K and L were reversed, I should be able to ascertain whether other ants who came to the larve had had the direction and position explained to them ; or whether, having only POWERS OF COMMUNICATION. 165 ’ been informed by 4 of the existence of the larve, they found their way to them by tracking a’s footsteps. If the former, they would in any case pass over the bridge kK by whichever strip of paper it was constituted. On the other hand, if they found the larve by tracking, then as the piece of paper by which a passed was transferred to L, it would mislead them and carry them away from the larve to1. In every case, then, I trans- posed the two papers forming the little bridges as soon as the ant a had crossed over K and L. I put her (November 7, 1875) to the larve on F at 6.15 a.m. After examining them carefully, she re- turned to the nest at 6.34. No other ants were out; but she at once reappeared with four friends and reached the larvee at 6.38. None of her friends, how- ever, crossed the bridge; they went on to D, wandered about, and returned home. a returned to the larve at 6.47, this time with one friend, who also went on to D and returned without finding the larva. 7. 0. Ant A to larve. Tips: - An ant at 710{"e aan L to I. Mela 3 with a friend, who at 7.21 ‘3 with two friends, | one of whom a ou 2% 7.32 the other at 7.35 s with a friend who | 7.41 7.25 % 7.39 9 went on to D, and Enehbatin sce oss 166 7.46 Ant A to larve. 7.55 8. 3 8. 8 8.19 8.24 8.39 8.50 9.12 9.22 9.40 9.47 9.55 10.35 29 EXPERIMENTS TO TEST An ant at 7.42 abaaie oF 9 7.47 ” 99 7.48 ” » D4 gy 99 7.57 ” a 9.10 found the larvee. ¥ 9.30 went over I to I. At 10.35 I imprisoned her till 12.30, when I put her again to the larve. 12.48 back to larvee. 12.55 120 1.15 1.20 An ant at 12.58 went over L tol. 99 1. 1 bb) ; W105 es ; 1.13) i After this she did not come any more. time she made, therefore, 25 visits to the larve; 21 other ants came a distance of nearly 4 feet from the nest and up to the point of junction within 2 inches of During the POWERS OF COMMUNICATION. 167 the larvee ; but only one passed over the little bridge to the larve, while 15 went over the bridge L tor. On repeating this experiment with another marked ant, she herself made 40 journeys, during which 19 other ants found their way to the point of junction. Only 2 went over the little bridge to the larve, 8 went over L to I, and the remainder on to D. In another similar experiment the marked ant made 16 journeys; and during the same time 13 other ants came to the point of junction. Of these 13, 6 went on to D, 7 crossed over L to 1, and not one found the larvee. Altogether, out of 92 ants, 30 went on to D, 51 crossed over in the wrong direction to I, and only 11 found their way to the larvee. From January 2 to January 24 (1875) I made a series of similar observations; and during this time 56 ants came in all. Of these, 20 went straight on to D, 26 across the paper to 1, and only Fig. 4. 10 to the larve. This, I think, gives strong reason to conclude that, under such circumstances, ants track one another by scent. I then slightly altered the arrange- ment of the papers as shown in the accompanying diagram (fig. 4). aA, as before, is the nest, o being the door. B is the board; h is a glass on which are placed the larvee; m is a similar glass, but empty ; n a strip of paper: to the end of 7 are pinned two 168 EXPERIMENTS TO TEST other strips f and g, in such a manner that they can be freely turned round, so that each can be turned at will either to A or m. Under ordinary circumstances the paper f, as in the figure, was turned to the larve; but whenever any ant, excepting the marked one, came, I turned the papers, so that f led to mandgtoh. The result was striking, and I give the observation in full in the Appendix. In all, 17 ants came, every one of whom took the wrong turn and went to m. Although the observations above recorded seem to Fig. 5. me almost conclusive, still I varied the experiments once more (see fig. 5), making the connexion between the board B and the glass containing the larvee by three separate but similar strips of paper, d, e, and f, as shown in the figure. Whenever, however, a strange ant came, I took up the strip f ™ and rubbed my finger over it two or three times so as to remove any scent, and then re- placed it. As soon as the stranger had reached the paper e, I took up the strip d, and placed it so as to connect e with the empty glass m. ThusI escaped the necessity of changing the paper f, and yet had a scented bridge between e and m. The details were given in the Appendix to the earlier editions, but have now been omitted to make way for other matter. In this experiment the bridge over which the marked ant passed to the larve was left in its place, the scent, however, being removed or obscured by the POWERS OF COMMUNICATION. 169 friction of my finger; on the other hand, the bridge (d) had retained the scent, but was so placed as to lead away from the larve; and, under these circum- stances, out of 41 ants which found their way towards the larve as far as e, 14 only passed over the bridge f to the larve, while 27 went over the bridge d to the empty glass m. Taking these observations as a whole, 150 ants came to the point e, of which 21 only went on to the larvee, while 95 went away to the empty glass. These experiments, therefore, seem to show that when an ant has discovered a store of food and others flock to it, they are guided in some cases by sight, while in others they track one another by scent. I then varied the experiment as follows :—I put an ant (L. niger) to some larve as usual, and when she knew her way, I allowed her to go home on her own legs ; but as soon as she emerged from the nest, if she had any friends with her, I took her up on a bit of paper and carried her tothe larvee. Under these circumstances very few ants indeed found their way tothem. Thus, on June 23, 1876, at 5.30, an ant which had been previously under observation was put to some larve. She took one and returned as usual to the nest. At 5.34 she came out with no less than 10 friends, and was then transferred to the larve. The others wandered about a little, but by degrees returned to the nest, not one of them finding their way to the larve. The first ant picked up a larva, returned, and again came ont 170 EXPERIMENTS TO TEST of the nest at 5.39 with 8 friends, when exactly the same thing happened. She again came out with companions at the undermentioned times :— Number of Number of Hour. Friends, Hour. Friends 5.44 4 6.44 — 5.47 4 6.46 3 5.49 — 6.49 2 5.52 = 6.56 — 5.54 5 6.59 — 5.57 2 7. 2 2 5.59 2 7.4 _ 6. 1 5 720 3 6. 4 ] 7. 8 3 Gal —- 7.10 5 6.11 3 7.13 — 6.14 * 7.17 3 6.17 6 7.19 Ul 6.20 -- 7.21 5 6.23 6 7.24 _- 6.25 6 7.26 3 6.29 8 1.29 | 6.32 2 (ees 2 6.35 “= 7.35 _- 6.42 4 Thus during these two hours more than 120 ants came out of the nest in company with the one under observation. She knew her way perfectly; and it is POWERS OF COMMUNICATION. 171 slear that if she had been left alone, all, or at least most of, these ants would have accompanied her to the store of larve. Three of them were accidentally allowed to do so; but of the remainder, only 5 found their way to the larvee ; all the others, after wandering about a while, returned listlessly to the nest. One of the ants which I employed in my experi- ments was under observation several days. I was, however, away from home most of the day, and when I left in the morning and went to bed at night I put her in a bottle ; but the moment she was let out she began work again. On one occasion I was away for a week, and on my return I let her out of the bottle, placing her on a little heap of larve about 3 feet from the nest. Under these circumstances I certainly did not expect her to return. However, though she had thus been six days in confinement, the brave little creature immediately picked up a larva, carried it off to the nest, and, after half an hour’s rest, returned for another. I conclude, then, that when large numbers of ants come to food they follow one another, being also to a certain extent guided by scent. The fact, therefore, does not imply any considerable power of intercom- munication. There are, moreover, some other circum- stances which seem to show that their powers in this respect are but limited. or instance, I have already mentioned that if a colony of Polyergus changes the situation of its nest, the mistresses are all carried to the new one by the slaves. Again, if a number of F. 172 EVIDENCE OF COMMUNICATION fusca are put in a box, and in one cornet a dark place of retreat is provided for them with some earth, one soon finds her way toit. She then comes out again, and going up to one of the others, takes her by the jaws. The second ant then rolls herself into a heap, and is carried off to the place of shelter. They then both repeat the same manceuvre with other ants, and so on until all their companions are collected together. Now it seems to me difficult to imagine that so slow a course would be adopted if they possessed any considerable power of descriptive communication. On the other hand, there can, I think, be no doubt that they do possess some power of the kind. This seems to me clearly shown by the following observations, In order, if possible, to determine whether the ants in question were brought to the larvee, or whether they came casually, I tried (1875) the following experiments: I took three tapes, each about 2 feet 6 inches long, and arranged them parallel to one another and about 6 inches apart. One end of each I attached to one of my nests (L. niger), and at the other end I placed a small glass. In the glass at the end of one tape I placed a considerable number (300 to 600) of larve. In the second I put two or three larve only; in the third none at all. The object of the last was to see whether many ants would come to the glasses under such cir- cumstances by mere accident; and I may at once say that but few did so. I then took two ants and EVIDENCE OF COMMUNICATION. 173 placed one of them to the glass with many larva, the other to that with two or three. Each of them took a larva and carried it to the nest, returning for another, and soon. After each journey I put another larva in the glass with only two or three larve, to replace that which had been removed. Now, if other ants came under the above circumstances as a mere matter of accident, or accompanying one another by chance, or if they simply saw the larve which were brought and consequently concluded that they might themselves also find larva in the same place, then the numbers going to the two glasses ought to be approximately equal. In each case the number of journeys made by the ants would be nearly the same; consequently, if it was a matter of scent, the two glasses would be in the same position It would be impossible for an ant, seeing another in the act of bringing a larva, to judge for itself whether there were few or many larve left behind. On the other hand, if the friends were brought, then it would be curious to see whether more were brought to the glass with many larve, than to that which only contained two or three. I should also mention that, excepting, of course, the marked speci- mens, every ant which came to the larve was im- prisoned until the end of the experiment. I give the details in the Appendix. The results of the above experiments are shown at a glance in the following Table :— 174 EVIDENCE OF COMMUNICATION. Tabular View of Experiments on Power of Communication. Glass with many larvss Glass with one or two larvss Obser- WAtOnS Time | No.of | No.of Time | No.of | No.of occupied | journeys | friends occupied | journeys | friends hours hours 1 1 U ll 2 - — ~- 1 3 _ _— — 2 4 _ — — 3 5 3 38 22 1 6 24 32 19 7 1 5 16 8 14 iy 21 3 2 9 = = = 1} 8 10 1 15 13 2 1 1l 2 32 20 1 1 12 5 26 10 13 — —- — 5 1 14 = —_ — 3 4 15 24 41 3 2 0 16 1 10 16 24 2 17 4} 53 2 45 10 18 — i — 2 1 19 1 ll 12 20 — — — 1 0 21 ig 20 15 4 27 22 —- — —_— 1 4 23 44 71 iq 24 — — — 2 4 25 2 34 3 26 i} 35 21 2 0 27 2 37 9 14 0 28 1} 9 10 2 0 29 2 37 5 1} 3 30 14 9 10 0 31 2 37 5 1} 3 5 2 24 7 1 0 33 3} 43 17 3} 1 34 1 27 28 12 35 1 14 2 1 9 304 593 104 It must be admitted that this mode of observing EVIDENCE OF COMMUNICATION. 176 is calculated to increase the number of friends brought by the ants to the glass with only 2 or 3 larve, for several reasons, but especially because in many cases an ant which had for some time had access to a glass with many larve was suddenly deprived of it, and it might well be that some time elapsed before the change was discovered. Some stray ants would, no doubt, in any case have found the larve; and we may probably allow for about 25 under this head. Again, some would, no doubt, casually accompany their friends; if we allow 25 also in this respect, we must deduct 50 from each side, and we shall have 254 against 54. Nevertheless, even without any allowances, the results seem to me very definite. Some of the individual cases, especially perhaps experiments 9, 10, 20, 21, and 22 (see Appendix), are very striking ; and, taken as a whole, during 52 hours, the ants which had access to a glass containing numerous larve brought 304 friends ; while during 59 hours those which were visiting a glass with only 2 or 3 larve brought only 104 to their assistance. One case of apparent communication struck me very much. I had had an ant (L. niger) under obser- vation one day, during which she was occupied in carrying off larve to her nest. At night I imprisoned her in a small bottle ; in the morning I let her out at 6.15, when she immediately resumed her occupation. Having to go to London, I imprisoned her again at 9 o'clock. When I returned at 4.40, I put her again 176 EVIDENCE OF COMMUNICATION. to the larve. She examined them carefully, but went home without taking one. At this time no other ants were out of the nest. In less than a minute she came out again with 8 friends, and the little troop made straight for the heap of larva. When they had gone two-thirds of the way, I again imprisoned the marked ants; the others hesitated a few moments, and then, with curious quickness, returned home. At 5.15 I put her again to the larve. She again went home without a larva, but, after only a few seconds’ stay in the nest, came out with no less than 13 friends. They all went towards the larve; but when they got about two-thirds of the way, although the marked ant had on the previous day passed over the ground about 150 times, and though she had just gone straight from the larve to the nest, she seemed to have forgotten her way and wandered; and after she had wandered about for half an hour, I put her to the larve. Now in this case the 21 ants must have been brought out by my marked one; for they came exactly with her, and there were no other ants out. Moreover, it would seem that they must have been told, because (which is very curious in itself) she did not in either case bring a larva, and consequently it cannot have been the mere sight of a larva which induced them to follow her. I repeated an experiment similar to this more than once. For instance, one rather cold day, when but few ants were out, I selected a specimen of Atta testaceo- EXPERIMENT WITH AN ATTA. 7a pilosa, belonging to a nest which I had brought back with me from Algeria. She was out hunting about six feet from home, and I placed before her a large dead bluebottle fly, which she at once began to drag to the nest. I then pinned the fly to a piece of cork, in a small box, so that no ant could see the fly until she had climbed up the side of the box. The ant struggled, of course in vain, to move the fly. She pulled first in one direction and then in another, but, finding her efforts fruitless, she at length started off back to the nest empty-handed. At this time there were no ants coming out of the nest. Probably there were some few others out hunting, but for at least a quarter of an hour no ant had left the nest. My ant entered the nest, but did not remain there; in less than a minute she emerged accompanied by 7 friends. I never saw so many come out of that nest together before. In her excitement the first ant soon distanced her companions, who took the matter with much more sang-froid, and had all the appearance of having come out reluctantly, or as if they had been asleep and were only half awake. The first ant ran on ahead, going straight to the fly. The others followed slowly and with many meanderings; so slowly, indeed, that for twenty minutes the first ant was alone at the fly, trying in every way to move it. Finding this still impossible, she again returned to the nest, not chancing to meet any of her friends by the way. Again she emerged in less than a minute with 8 friends, and N 178 EXPERIMENT WITH AN ATTA. hurried on to the fly. They were even less energetic than the first party ; and when they found they had lost sight of their guide, they one and all returned to the nest. In the meantime several of the first detach« ment had found the fly, and one of them succeeded in detaching a leg, with which she returned in triumph to the nest, coming ont again directly with 4 or 5 companions. ‘[hese latter, with one exception, soon gave up the chase and returned to the nest. I do not think so much of this last case, because as the ant carried in a substantial piece of booty in the shape of the fly’s leg, it is not surprising that her friends should some of them accompany her on her return; but surely the other two cases indicate a distinct power of communication. Lest, however, it should be supposed that the result was accidental, I determined to try it again. Accord- ingly on the following day I put another large dead fly before an ant belonging to the same nest, pinning it to a piece of cork as before. After trying in vain for ten minutes to move the fly, my ant started off home. At that time I could only see two other ants of that species outside the nest. Yet in a few seconds, con- siderably less than a minute, she emerged with no less than 12 friends. As in the previous case, she ran on abead, and they followed very slowly and by no means directly, taking, in fact, nearly half an hour to reach the fly. The first ant, after vainly labouring for about a guarter of an hour to move the fly, started off EXPERIMENT WITH AN ATTA, 179 again to the nest. Meeting one of her friends on the way she conversed with her a little, then continued towards the nest, but, after going about a foot, changed her mind, and returned with her friend to the fly. After some minutes, during which two or three other ants came up, one of them detached a leg, which she carried off to the nest, coming out again almost immedi- ately with six frierds, one of whom, curiously enough, seemed to lead the way, tracing it, I presume, by scent. I then removed the pin, and they carried off the fly in triumph. Again, on June 15, 1878, another ant belonging to the same nest had found a dead spider, about the same distance from the nest. I pinned down the spider as before. The ant did all in her power to move it; but after trying fom twelve minutes, she went off to the nest. Although for a quarter of an hour no other ant had left the nest, yet in a few seconds she came out again with 10 companions. As in the preceding case, they followed very leisurely. She ran on ahead and worked at the spider for ten minutes; when, as none of her friends had arrived to her assistance, though they were wan- dering about, evidently in search of something, she started back home again. In three quarters of a minute after entering the nest she reappeared, this time with 15 friends, who came on somewhat more rapidly than the preceding batch, though still but slowly. By degrees, however, they all came up, and after most persevering efforts carried off the spider n2 180 EXPERIMENT WITH PHEIDOLE. piecemeal. On July 7,1 tried the same experiment with a soldier of Pheidole megacephala. She pulled at the fly for no less than fifty minutes, after which she went to the nest and brought five friends exactly as the Atta had done. In the same way, one afternoon at 6.20 I presented a slave of Polyergus with a dead fly pinned down. The result was quite different. My ant pulled at the fly for twenty-five minutes, when, as in the previous cases, she returned to the nest. There she remained four or five minutes, and then came out again alone, returned to the fly, and again tried to carry it off. After working fruitlessly for between twenty and twenty- five minutes, she again went back to the nest, staying there four or five minutes, and then returning by her- self to the fly once more. I then went away for an hoar, but on my return found her still tugging at the fly by herself. One hour later again I looked, with the same result. Shortly afterwards another ant wandering about found the fly, but obviously, as it seemed to me, by accident. At 3 o’clock on a subsequent day I again put a dead fly pinned on to a bit of cork before a Formica fusca, who was out hunting. She tried in vain to carry it off, ran round and round, tugged in every direction, and at length at ten minutes to four she returned to the nest : very soon after she reappeared preceded by one and followed by two friends; these, however, failed to dis- vover the fly, and after wandering about a little returned EXPERIMENT WITH FORMICA. 181 to the nest. She then set again to work alone, and in about forty minutes succeeded in cutting off the head of the fly, which she at once carried into the nest. In alittle while she came out again, this time accompanied by five friends, all of whom found their way to the fly ; one of thease, having cut off the aldomen of the fly, took it into the nest, leaving three of her companions to bring in the remainder of their prey. These experiments certainly seem to indicate the possession by ants of something approaching to lan- guage. It is impossible to doubt that the friends were brought out by the first ant; and as she returned empty-handed to the nest, the others cannot have been induced to follow her merely by observing her proceed- ings. In face of such facts as these, it is impossible not to ask ourselves how far are ants mere exquisite automatons ; how far are they conscious beings? When we see an ant-hill, tenanted by thousands of industrious inhabitants, excavating chambers, forming tunnels, making roads, guarding their home, gathering food, feeding the young, tending their domestic animals, —each one fulfilling its duties industriously, and without confusion,—it is difficult altogether to deny to them the gift of reason; and the preceding observa- tions tend to confirm the opinion that their mental powers differ from those of men, not so much in kind as in degree. CHAPTER VIII. ON THE SENSES OF ANTS. The Sense of Vision. Tr is, I think, generally assumed not only that the world really exists as we see it, but that it appears to other animals pretty much as it does to us. A little con- sideration, however, is sufficient to show that this is very far from being certain, or even probable. In the case of insects, moreover, the mode of vision is still an enigma. They have, at least many of them have, a large compound eye on each side; and ocelli, generally three in number, situated on the summit of the head. The compound eyes consist of a number of facets, each situated at the summit of a tube, to the base of which runs a fibre of the optic nerve. The structure of the ocellus and that of the com- pound eye are essentially different, and it does not seem possible that either the ocellus should be derived from the compound eye, or the compound eye from the ocel- lus. On the contrary, both seem to point back to a less developed ancestral type. Starting from such an origin, an increase of the separate elements and an im- provement of the lens would lead to the ocellus, while TWO KINDS OF EYES. 183 an increase of the number of eyes would bring us to the compound eye. On the other hand, it must be admitted that there are reasons for considering the different kinds of eyes to be of perfectly distinct origin. The eye of Limulus, according to Grenacher, is formed on a plan quite unlike that of other Crustacea. Again, the develop- ment of the eye in Musca, to judge from Weismann’s observations, is very dissimiliar from that of other insects. The varied position of the eye in different groups, as, for instance, in Pecten, Spondylus, Euphausia, Onchidium, &c., point to the same con- clusion. It seems clear that the image produced by the ocelli must be altogether ditferent from the picture given by the compound eyes; and we may therefore reasonably conclude that the two organs have distinct functions. It used formerly to be supposed that the compound eyes were intended for distant, the ocelli for near vision. Claparéde, however, has maintained the opposite theory, while Mr. Lowne regards the ocelli as incapable of producing ‘anything worthy the name of an image,’ and suspects that their function ‘is the perception of the intensity in the direction of light, rather than vision.’ The ocelli, or simple eyes, probably see in the same manner a3 ours do. That is to say, the lens throws an image on the back of the eye, which we call the retina. In that case they would see everything really reversed, 184 HOW INSECTS SEE, as we do; though long practice has given us the right impression. The simple eye of insects thus resembles ours in this respect. As regards the mode of vision of the compound eyes, there are two distinct theories. According to one—- the mosaic theory of Muller—each facet takes in only a small portion of the field; while according to the other, each facet acts as a separate eye. This latter view has been maintained by many high authorities, but it is difficult to understand how so many images could be combined into one picture. Some insects have more than 20,000 facets on each side of their head. No ants, indeed, have so many, but in some—as, for instance, in the males of Formica »ratensis —there are not less than 1,000. The theory, moreover, presents some great anatomical ditticulties. Thus, in certain cases there is no lens, and conse- quently there can be no image ; in some it would seem that the image would be formed completely behind the eye, while in others again it would be in front of the receptive surface. Another difficulty is that any true projection of an image would in certain species be pre- cluded by the presence of impenetrable pigment, which only leaves a minute central passage for the light-rays. Again, it is urged that even the sharpest image woula be useless, from the absence of a suitably receptive surface; since the structure of the receptive surface corresponding to each facet seems to preclude it from receiving more than a single impression. THE MOSAIC THEORY. 185 The prevailing opinion of entomologists now is that each facet receives the impression of one pencil of rays ; so that, in fact, the image formed in a compound eye is a sort of mosaic. On the other hand, this theory itself presents great difficulties. Those ants which have very few facets must have an extremely imperfect vision. Again, while the image produced on the retina of the ocellus must of course be reversed as in ovr own eyes; in the compound eyes, on the contrary, the vision would, on this theory, be direct. That the same animal should see some things directly, and others reversed ; and yet obtain definite conceptions of the outer world, would certainly be very remarkable. In fact, these, so far fortunate, insects realise the epigram of Plato— Thou lookest on the stars, my love, Ah, would that I could be Yon starry skies, with thousand eyes That I might look on thee! But if the male of F. pratensis sees 1,000 queens at once, when only one is really present, this would seem to be a bewildering privilege, and the prevailing opinion among entomologists is, as already mentioned, that each facet only takes in a portion of the object. But while it is difficult to understand how ants see, it is clear that they do see. From the observations of Sprengel there could of 186 LIMITS OF VISION. course be little, if any, doubt, that bees are capable of distinguishing colours; and I have proved experi- mentally, as will be shown in a subsequent chapter, that this is the case. Under these circumstances, I have been naturally anxious to ascertain, if possible, whether the same holds good with ants. I have, however, found more difficulty in doing so because, as shown in the observations just recorded, ants find their food so much more by smell than by sight. This being so, I could not apply to ants those tests which had been used in the case of bees. At length, however, it occurred to me that I might utilize the dislike which ants, when in their nests, have to light. Of course they have no such feeling when they are out in search of food; but if light is let in upon their nests, they at once hurry about in search of the darkest corners, and there they all congregate. If, for instance, I uncovered one of my nests and then placed an opaque substance over one portion, the ants invariably collected in the shaded part. I procured, therefore, four similar strips of glass, coloured respectively green, yellow, red, and blue, or, rather, violet. The yellow was rather paler in shade, and that glass consequently rather more transparent than the green, which, again, was rather more traus- parent than the red or violet. I also procured some coloured solutions. Prof. Dewar was kind enough to test my glasses and solutions with reference to their power of trans- POWER OF DISTINGUISHING COLOURS, 187 mitting colour. Taking the wave-length of the ex- treme visible red as 760 and that of the extreme violet as 397, we have 760 to 647 give red. 647 ,, 585 ,, orange. 585 ,, 575 ,, yellow. 575 ,, 497 ,, green. 497 ,, 455 ,, blue. 445 ,, 397 ,, violet. The result of his examination of my glasses and solutions was as follows :— The light-yellow glass cut off the high end down to wave-length 442. The dark-yellow glass cut off the high end down to wave-length 493. The green glass cut off the high end down to wave- length 465, and also the red to 616. The red glass cut off the high end down to wave- length 582. The violet glass cut off the orange and yellow trom wave-length 684 to 583, and a band between wave-lengths 543 and 516. The purple glass cut off the high end down to wave-length 528. The solution of chromate of potash cut off the high end to 507. The saffron cut off the high end to about 473. The blue fluid cut off the low end to 516. The red fluid cut off the high end to 596. 188 EXPERIMENTS WITH COLOURED GLASSES. I then (July 15, 1876) laid the strips of glass on one of my nests of Formica fusca, containing about 170 ants. These ants, as I knew by many previous observations, seek darkness, at least when in the nest, and would collect in the darkest part. I then, after counting the ants under each strip, moved the glasses, at intervals of about half an hour, so that each should by turns cover the same portion of the nest. The results were as follows—the numbers indicating the approximate numbers of ants under each glass (there were sometimes a few not under any of the strips of glass ) :— 1. Green. Yellow. Red. Violet. 50 40 80 0 2: Violet. Green. Yellow. Red. 0 20 40 100 3, Red. Violet. Green. Yellow. 60 0 50 50 4. Yellow. Red. Violet. Green. 50 70 1 40 5. Green. Yellow. Red. Violet. 30 30 100 0 6. Violet. Green. Yellow. Red. 0 14 5 140 (i Red. Violet. Green. Yellow. 50 0 40 70 8. Yellow. Red. Violet. Green. 40 50 I 70 EXPERIMENTS WITH COLOURED GLASSES. 189° 9 Green. Yellow. Red. Violet. 60 35 65 0 10. Violet. Green. Yellow. Red. 1 50. 40 70 bl. Red. Violet. Green. Yellow. 50 2 50 60 Pz Yellow. Red. Violet. Green. 35 55 0 70 Adding these numbers together, there were, in the twelve observations, under the red 890, under the green 544, under the yellow 495, and under the violet only 5. The difference between the red and the green is very striking, and would doubtless have been more so, but for the fact that when the colours were trans- posed the ants which had collected under the red sometimes remained quiet, as, for instance, in cases 7 and 8. Again, the difference between the green and yellow would have been still more marked but for the fact that the yellow always occupied the position last held by the red, while, on the other hand, the green had some advantage in coming next the violet. In considering the difference between the yellow and green, we must remember also that the green was decidedly more opaque than the yellow. The case of the violet glass is more marked and more interesting. To our eyes the violet was as opaque as the red, more so than the green, and much more so than the yellow. Yet, as the numbers show, the ants 190 EXPERIMENTS WITH COLOURED GLASSES. had scarcely any tendency to congregate under it. There were neariy as many under the same area of the uncovered portion of the nest as under that shaded by the violet glass. Lasius flavus also showed a marked avoidance of the violet glass. I then experimented in the same way with a nest of Formica fusca, in which there were some pup2, which were generally collected in a single heap. I used glasses coloured dark yellow, dark green, light yellow, light green, red, violet, and dark purple. The colours were always in the preceding order, but, as before, their place over the nest was changed after every observation. To our eyes the purple was almost black, the violet and dark green very dark and quite opaque ; the pup could be dimly seen through the red, rather more clearly through the dark yellow and light green, while the light yellow were almost transparent. There were about 50 pup, and the light was the ordinary diffused daylight of summer. These observations showed a marked preference for the greens and yellows. The pupx were 64 times under dark green, 3 under dark yellow, 34 under red, and once each under light yellow and light green, the violet and purple being altogether neglected. I now tried the same ants under the same colours, but in the sun; and placed a shallow dish containing some 10 per cent. solution of alum sometimes over EXPERIMENTS WITH COLOURED GLASSES. 191 the yellow, sometimes over the red. I also put four thicknesses of violet glass, so that it looked almost black. Under these circumstances, the pupx were placed under the red 7 times, dark yellow 5, once they were half under each, but never under the violet, purple, light yellow, dark or light green. The following day I placed over the same nest, in the sun, dark green glass, dark red, and dark yellow. In nine observations the pupe were carried three times under the red and nine times under the yellow. I then tried a similar series of experiments with Lasvus niger, using a nest in which were about 40 pupz, which were generally collected in a single heap all together. As before, the glasses were. moved in regular order after each experiment ; and I arranged them so that the violet followed the red. As far, therefore, as position was concerned, this gave violet rather the best place. The glasses used were dark violet, dark red, dark green, and yellow, the yellow being distinctly the most transparent to our eyes. Experiment Experiment 1. Pupz under yellow. 8. Pups under green. 2. ” 29 9. 9 red. 3. ? ” 10. ” yellow. 4, ss an 1G mS red. 5, 9 ” 12. ry) yellow. 6. * ” 13. ” 9 i, - green. | 14. strodies red: 192 EXPERIMENTS WITH COLOURED GLASSES, Experiment Experiment 15. Pup under green. 24. Pup under red. 16. 7 . 29% 5 yellow. 17. = yellow. 26. 6 red 18. ” ” 27. ” +) 19. . Teds epee ” 3 20. ” ” 29. ” 5) ai. 3 yellow. | 30. S yellow. 22. . ms 31. a red. 23. Re sh $2. 3 green. I now put two extra thicknesses of glass over the red and green. 33. Pupze under red. 37. Pupze under red. 34. - yellow. 38. + 55 35— es red. 39. a yellow. BO. . yellow. 40. i red. The result is very striking, and in accordance with the observations on Formica fusca. In 40 experi- ments the pupe were carried under the yellow 19 times, under the red 16 times, and under the green 5 times only, while the violet was quite neglected. After the first twenty observations, however, I removed it. I then tried a nest of Cremastogaster scutellaris with violet glass, purple glass, and red, yellow, and green solutionsy formed respectively with fuchsine, bichromate of potash, and chloride of copper. The purple looked almost black, the violet very dark; the EXPERIMENTS WITH COLOURED GLASSES. 193 red and green, on the contrary, very transparent, and the yellow even more so. The yellow was not darker than a tincture of saffron. The latter indeed, to my eye, scarcely seemed to render the insects under them at all less apparent ; while under the violet and purple T could not trace them at all. I altered the relative positions as before. The nest contained about 50 larve and pupe. I made thirteen trials, and in every case the larvew and pup were brought under the yellow or the green —never once under any of the other colours. Again, over a nest of Formica fusca containing about 20 pupz I placed violet glass, purple glass, a weak solution of fuchsine (carmine), the same of chloride of copper (green), and of bichromate of potash (yellow, not darker than saffron). I made eleven trials, and again, in every case the pupz were brought under the yellow or the green. I then tried a nest of Lasius flavus with the purple glass, violet glass, very weak bichromate of potash, and chloride of copper as before. With this species, again, the results were the same as in the previous cases. In all these experiments, therefore, the violet and purple light affected the ants much more strongly than the yellow and green. It is curious that the coloured glasses appear to act on the ants (speaking roughly) as they would, or, fo) 194 DISLIKE OF VIOLET. I should rather say, inversely as they would, on a photographic plate. It might even be alleged that the avoidance of the violet glass by the ants was due to their preferring rays transmitted by the other glasses. From the habits of these insects such an explanation would be very improbable. If, however, the preference for the other coloured glasses to the violet was due to the trans- mission and not to the absorption of rays—that is tc say, if the ants went under the green rather than the violet because the green transmitted rays which were agreeable to the ants, and which the violet glass, on the contrary, stopped—then, if the violet was placed over the other colours, they would become as distasteful to the ants as the violet itself. On the contrary, how- ever, whether the violet glass was placed over the others or not, the ants equaliy readily took shelter under them. Obviously, therefore, the ants avoid the violet glass because they dislike the rays which it transmits. But though the ants so markedly avoided the violet glass, still, as might be expected, the violet glass cer- tainly had some effect, because if it were put over the nest alone, the ants preferred being under it to being under the plain glass oniy. I then compared the violet glass with a solution of ammorio-sulphate of copper, which is very similar in colour, though perhaps a little more violet, and arranged the depth of the fluid so as to make it as nearly as pos- sible of the same depth of colour as the glass, EXPERIMENTS WITH COLOURED SOLUTIONS. 195 Approx. num- ber of Ants under the Exp. | Exp. |Exp. | Exp.| Exp.| Exp,| Exp.| Exp. | I’xp. 1, 2. 3. 4, 5. 6. ide 8. 9. Gines ccl -01)00| 2012) “ol Vel ol) eyes Solution... 40] 80/100} 8o| 50} 70] 60| 40] 90 In another experiment with Lasius niger I used the dark yellow glass, dark violet glass, and a violet solution of 5 per cent. ammonio-sulphate of copper, diluted so as to be, to my eye, of exactly the same tint as the violet glass; in 8 observations the pup# were three times under the violet solution, and 5 times under the yellow glass. I then removed the yellow glass, and in 10 more observations the pups were always brought under the solution. It is interesting that the glass and the solution should affect the ants so differently, because to my eye the two were almost identical in colour. The glass, however, was more transparent than the solu- tion. To see whether there would be the same difference between red glass and red solution as between violet glass and violet solution, I then (Aug. 21) put over a nest of Formica fusca a red glass and a solution of carmine, as nearly as I could make it of the same tint. In 10 experiments, however, the ants were, generally speaking, some under the solution and some under the glass, in, moreover, as nearly as possible equal numbers. August 20.—Over a nest of Forinica fusca con- 02 196 EXPERIMENTS WITH COLOURED SOLUTIONS. taining 20 pup, I placed a saturated solution of bichromate of potash, a deep solution of carmine, which let through scarcely any but the red rays, and a white porcelain plate. Obs. . Under the bichr. of potash were 0 pup, carmine 18, porcelain 2 1 2. ” 9 0 ” ” 3 r— aAOoworawn —_ ) coonrcOoOa om _ 2 [este ae i my Total ... ses 18 fo) = _ b = I then put over another nest of Formica fusca four layers of red glass (which, when examined with the spectroscope, let through red light only), four layers of green glass (which, examined in the same way, transmitted nothing but a very little green), anda porcelain plate. Under these circumstances the ants showed no marked preference, but appeared to feel equally protected, whether they were under the red glass, the green glass, or the porcelain. Thus, though it appears from other experiments that ants are affected by red light, still the quantity that passes through dark red glass does not seem greatly to disturb them. I tested this again by placing over a nest containing a queen and about 10 pupe a piece of EXPERIMENTS ON A QUEEN ANT. 197 opaque porcelain, one of violet, and one of red glass, all of the same size. The result is shown below. Obs. 1. Queen went under red glass 5 AEA eeeeea ia 2 fees 2. e; porcelain 0 ” 7 ” 3. 33 red glass 0 5 7 ” 4. Ld) 9 6 9° 2 ” 5. ” ” 6 ” 2 ” 6. ” ” 3 ” if ° ie os s 10 99 0 ” 8. % 4 » 6 ” 9. ” ” 1 ” 0 ” 10. 5 porcelain 0 ° 10 ” 11. ” red glass 10 ” 0 ” 12. si porcelain 4 + 6 ” 13. - red glass 7 ” 3 ” 14, y porcelain 4 » 6 ” 15. 3 red glass 4 $ 6 ” 16. = porcelain 0 ; 10 ” VW. #3 red glass 10 9 0 ” 18. 5 ”» 8 ” 2 ” 19. a porcelain 7 & 3 ” 20. RS + 1 ” 9 ” Total 90 88 Obviously, therefore, the ants showed no marked preference for the porcelain. On one, but only on one occasion (Obs. 9), most of the pups were carried under the violet glass, but generally it was quite neglected. I now tried a similar experiment with porcelain and yellow glass. Obs. g { Pup were taken { under { under yellow. porcelain 2. ” ” 2 ” 8 ”» 3: ” o 8 ” 3 ” 1. Queen went under porcelain 198 EXPERIMENTS WITH SPECTRUM. Obs. 4. Queen went under yellow glass 5 { es 5 { p ance 5 a porcelain 3) . 8 oF 6. cb yellow glass 8 a 3 = UE a5 porcelain 6 an 5 8. ” ” 0 ” 7 ” 9. ” ” 0 9” 10 ” 10. » yellow glass 5 ay 5 a 1. “5 porcelain 8 n 2 5 12. > ” 3 ” 7 ” 13. (0 yellow glass 10 of 0 of 14, s porcelain 0 vy 10 7 16. op yellow glass 10 ” 0 a 16. ” ” 7 ” 3 » 17. ” ” 10 ” 0 ” 18. rr porcelain 1 5 9 “1 19. ” ” 0 ” 10 ” 98 92 The porcelain and yellow glass seemed, therefore, to affect the ants almost equally. I then put two ants on a paper bridge, the ends supported by pins, the bases of which were in water. The ants wandered backwards and forwards, endea- vouring to escape. I then placed the bridge in the dark and threw the spectrum on it, so that succes- sively the red, yellow, green, blue, and violet fell on the bridge. The ants, however, walked backwards and forwards without (perhaps from excitement) taking any notice of the colour. I then allowed some ants (Lasius niger) to find some larve, to which they obtained access over a narrow paper bridge. When they had got used to it, LIMITS OF VISION 199 { arranged so that it passed through a dark box, and threw on it the principal colours of the spectrum, namely, red, yellow, green, blue, and violet, as well as the ultra-red and ultra-violet; but the ants took no notice. It is obvious that these facts suggest a number of interesting inferences. I must, however, repeat the observations and make others; but we may at least, I think, conclude from the preceding that:—{1) ants have the power of distinguishing colours ; (2) that they are very sensitive to violet; and it would also seem (3) that their sensations of colour must be very different from those produced upon us. But I was anxious to go beyond this, and to attempt to determine how far their limits of vision are the same as ours. We all know that if a ray of white light is passed through a prism, it is broken up into a beautiful band of colours—the spectrum. To our eyes this spectrum is bounded by red at the one end anc violet at the other, the edge being sharply marked at the red end, but less abruptly at the violet. But a ray of light contains, besides the rays visible to our eyes, others which are called, though not with absolute correctness, heat-rays and chemical rays. These, so faa from falling within the limits of our vision, extend far beyond it, the heat-rays at the red, the chemical rays at the violet end. I have tried various experiments with spectra derived from sunlight; but, owing to the rotation of 200 THE ULTRA-RED AND ULTRA-VIOLET RAYS. the earth, they were not thoroughly satisfactory. Mr. Spottiswoode was also good enough to enable me to make some experiments with electric light, which were not very conclusive; more recently I have made some additional and much more complete experiments, through the kindness of Prof. Dewar, Prof. Tyndall, and the Board of Managers of the Royal Institution, to whom I beg to offer my cordial thanks. Of course, the space occupied by the visible spec- trum is well marked off by the different colours. Beyond the visible spectrum, however, we have no such convenient landmarks, and it is not enough to describe it by inches, because so much depends on the prisms used. If, however, paper steeped in thalline is placed in the ultra-violet portion of the spectrum, it gives, with rays of a certain wave-length, a distinctly visible green colour, which therefore constitutes a green band, and gives us a definite, though rough, standard of measurement. In the above experiments with coloured spectra, the ants carried the pup out of the portion of the nest on which coloured light was thrown and deposited them against the wall of the nest; or, if I arranged a nest of Formica fusca so that it was entirely in the light, they carried them to one side or into one corner. It seemed to me, therefore, that it would be interesting so to arrange matters, that on quitting the spectrum, after passing through a dark space, the ants should encounter not a solid obstacle, but a barrier of light. With this EXPERIMENTS WITH ELECTRIC LIGHT. 201 object, I prepared some nests 12 inches long by 6 inches wide; and Mr. Cottrell kindly arranged for me at the Royal Institution on the 29th of June, by means of the electric light, two spectra, which were thrown by two glass prisms on to a table at an angle of about 45° Each occupied about 6 inches square, and there was a space of about 2 inches between them—that is, between the red end of the one and the violet of the other. Experiment 1.—In one of the spectra I placed a nest of Formica fusca, 12 inches by 6, containing about 150 pupz, and arranged it so that one end was distinctly beyond the limit of the violet visible to us, and all but to the edge of the green given by thalline paper, and the other just beyond the visible red. The pupzat first were almost all in or beyond the violet, but were carried into the dark space between the two spectra, the bright thalline band being avoided, but some pup being deposited in the red. Experiment 2.—I then tried the same experiment with a nest of Lasius niger, in which there were many larve as well as pupze. They were all at the commence- ment at the blue end of the nearer spectrum. The larvee were left by themselves in the violet, while pupz were ranged from the end of the green to that of the red inclusive. Experiment 3.—Arranged a nest of L. niger as before ; at the commencement the pup and larve were much scattered, being, however, less numerous in the violet and ultra-violet rays. Those in the ultra-violet 202 EXPERIMENTS WITH ELECTRIC LIGHT. rays were moved first, and were deposited, the larve in the violet, and the pup in the red. EHaperiment 4.—Made the same experiment with another nest of L. niger. At the commencement the larve and pup were in the violet and ultra-violet portion, extending to double the distance from the visible end to the thalline band. The ants soon began bringing the pupz to the red. Over part of the red I placed a piece of money. The pupz were cleared from the ultra-violet first. That the pupz were not put in the red for the sake of the red light was evident, because the space under the coin was even more crowded than the rest. The pupz were heaped up in the dark as far as the thalline band of the other spec- trum. I then brought the second spectrum nearer to the first. The pups which thus came to be in the thalline band were gradually moved into the dark. Experiment 5.—Tried the same with another nest of L. niger. The pupe were at first in the violet and ultra-violet about double as far as the thalline line, while most of the larve were in the green. The furthest part was cleared first ; and they were again brought principally into the yellow, red, and dark. Again, I scattered them pretty equally, some being in the ultra-violet portion, as far as double the distance of the thalline from the violet; most, however, being in the violet and blue. The ants began by removing the pup which were EXPERIMENTS WITH ELECTRIC LIGHT. 203 in and near the thalline band, and carried them into the yellow or red. Experiment 6.—Repeated the same experiment. Begun it at 11.15. Placed some pupz in the red, some in the yellow, and a few scattered over the second spectrum ; there were none in the nearer one. They were all carried away from the red past the violet, and put down in the dark portion, or in the red and yellow, of the nearer spectrum. These experiments surprised me much at the time, as I had expected all the pups to be carried into the space between the two spectra; but it afterwards occurred to me that the ultra-violet rays probably extended further than I had supposed, so that even the part which lay beyond the thalline band contained enough rays to appear light to the ants. Hence perhaps they selected the red and yellow as a lesser evil. Experiment 7.—I altered, therefore, the arrange- ment. Prof. Dewar kindly prepared for me a con- densed pure spectrum (showing the metallic lines) with a Siemens’ machine, using glass lenses and a mirror to give a perpendicular incidence when thrown on the nest. I arranged the pup again in the ultra-violet as far as the edge of the fluorescent light shown with thalline paper. The pupz were all again removed, and most of them placed just beyond the red, but none in the red or yellow. Experiment 8.—Arranged the light as before, and piaced the pupa in the ultra-violet rays. In half an 204 EXPERIMENTS WITH ELECTRIC LIGHT. hour they were all cleared away and carried into the dark space beyond the red. We then turned the nest round s0 that the part occupied by the pups again came to be in the violet and ultra-violet. The light chanced to be so arranged that along one side of the nest was a line of shadow ; and into this the pupe were carried, all those in the ultra-violet being moved. We then shifted the nest a little, so that the violet, and ultra-violet fell on some of the pupa. ‘These were then all carried into the dark, the ones in the ultra-violet being moved first. In these experiments with the vertical incidence there was less diffused light, and the pup were in no case carried into the red or yellow. Experiment 9.—I arranged the light and the ants as before, placing the pup in the ultra-violet, some being distinctly beyond the bright thalline band. The ants at once began to remove them. At first many were deposited in the violet, some, however, being at once carried into the dark beyond the red. When all had been removed from the ultra-violet, they directed their attention to those in the violet, some being carried, as before, into the dark, some into the red and yellow. Again, when those in the violet had all been removed, they began on the pupe in the red and yellow, and carried them also into the dark. This took nearly half an hour. As I had arranged the pup so that it might be said that they were awkwardly placed, we then turned the nest round, leaving the pupz otherwise as they had been arranged by the ants; but the result of ANTS NOT SENSITIVE TO ULTRA-RED RAYS. 205 mcving the nest was to bring some of them into the violet, though most were in the ultra-violet. They were, as before, all carried into the dark space beyond the red in about half an hour, We then turned the glass round again, this time arranging the end about the length of the spectrum beyond the end of the violet visible to oureyes. They began clearing the thalline band, carrying some into the violet, but the majority away further from the spectrum. In a quarter of an hour the thalline band had been quite cleared ; and in half an hour a band beyond, and equal to the thalline band, those in the violet being left untouched. After the pups in the ultra-violet portion had all been moved, those in the violet were also carried away and deposited about twice as far from the edge of the violet as the further edge of the bright thalline band. Experiment 10.—Experimented again with the same arrangement as before, using another nest of Lasiws niger and placing the pups in the violet and a little beyond. The ants at once began removing them into the dark, tunnelling into the heap, and then carry- ing away those in the ultra-violet first, although they were further off. In half an hour they had all been moved out of the violet and ultra-violet, about half being placed in the dark, and half having been pro- visionally deposited in the red and yellow. Experiment 11.—Same arrangement as_ before. The pup being placed all along one side of the nest, 206 ANTS NOT SENSITIVE TO ULTRA-RED RAYS, from the edge of the red to a distance beyond the violet as great as the whole length of the spectrum. I began at 4.15. By degrees they were all cleared away from the spectrum, except those in the violet, where indeed, and immediately outside of which, the others were placed. At 5, however, they began to carry them back into.the red. At 5.45 the blue and violet were nearly cleared, the pupe being placed in the red and yellow. At 6.15 they had all been brought from the violet and ultra- violet into the red and yellow. I then shook up the pupe so that they were arranged all along one side of the nest, and extended about an inch beyond the red. This excited the ants very much, and in less than ten minutes all those in the spectrum, and for about 6 inches beyond the violet, were moved, but at first they were put down anywhere, so that they were scattered all over the nest. This, however, lasted for a very short time, and they were all carried into the dark beyond the red, or into the extreme end at some distance beyond the violet. At 7 the edge of the heap of pupze followed the line of the red at one end, coming about } inch within it, which was not owing to want of room, as one side of the nest was almost unoccupied; at the other end they were all carried 3 inches beyond the end of the violet. It would seem, then, as the result of these experi- ments, that the limits of vision of ants at the red end of tbe spectrum are approximately the same as ours, that they are not sensitive to the ultra-red | BUT VERY SENSITIVE TO ULTRA-VIOLET RAYS, 207 rays; but, on the other hand, that they are very sen- sitive to the ultra-violet rays, which our eyes cannot perceive. I then arranged the same ants in a wooden frame consisting of a base and two side walls, between which in the middle was a perpendicular sliding door. The pups had been arranged by the ants in the centre of the nest, so that some were on each side of the door. We then threw, by means of a strong induction-coil, a magnesium-spark on the nest from one side, and the light from a sodium-flame in a Bunsen burner on the other, the light being in each case stopped by the sliding door, which was pressed close dewn on the nest. In this way the first half was illuminated by the one light, the second by the other, the apparatus being so arranged that the lights were equal to our eyes—that, however, given by the magnesium, consisting mainly of blue, violet, and ultra-violet rays, that of the sodium being very yellow and poor in chemical rays. In a quarter of an hour the pupz were all carried into the yellow. The sodium light being the hotter of the two, to eliminate the action of heat I introduced a water-cell between the ants and the sodium-flame, and made the two sides as nearly as possible equally light to my eye. The pup, however, were again carried into the sodium side. I repeated the same experiment as before, getting the magnesium-spark and the sodium-flame to the same degree of intensity, as nearly as my eye could judge, 208 EXPERIMENTS WITH MAGNESIUM SPARK and interposing a water-screen between the sodium- flame and the ants. The temperature was tested by the thermometer, and I could distinguish no difference between the two sides. Still the ants preferred the sodiuin side. This I repeated twice. I then removed the magnesium-spark somewhat, so that the illumina- tion on that side was very much fainter than on the other; still the pupz were carried into the sodium- light. I then turned the nest round so as to bring them back into the magnesium. They were again carried to the sodium side. Once more I repeated the same experiment. The light on the magnesium side was so faint that I could scarcely see the pupz, those on the sodium side being quite plain. The thermometer showed no difference between the two sides. The pupz were carried into the sodium-light. I then turned the nest round twice ; but the pup were each time carried out of the magnesium-light. These experiments seemed strongly to indicate, if not to prove, that ants were really sensitive to the ultra-violet rays. Now to these rays sulphate of quinine and bisulphide of carbon are extremely opaque, though perfectly transparent in the case of visible rays, and therefore to our eyes entirely colourless and trans- parent. If, therefore, the ants were really affected by the ultra-violet rays, then a cell containing a layer of sulphate of quinine or bisulphide of carbon would tend to darken the underlying space to their eyes, though to ours it would not do so, AND SODIUM FLAME, 209 It will be remembered that if an opaque substance is placed over a part of a glass nest, other things being equal, the ants always congregate under it ; and that if substances of different opacity are placed on different parts of a nest, they collect under that which seems to them most opaque. Over one of my nests of Formica fusca, therefore, I placed two pieces of dark-violet glass 4 inches by 2 inches; and over one of them I placed a cell containing a layer of bisulphide of carbon, an inch thick, slightly coloured with iodine. In all these experi- ments, when I moved the liquids or glasses, I gave the advantage, if any, to the one under which experi- ence showed that the ants were least likely to congre- gate. The ants all collected under the glass over which was the bisulphide of carbon. I then thought that though no doubt the iodine rendered the bisulphide more completely impervious to the ultra-violet rays, I would try the effect of it when pure and perfectly colourless. I therefore tried the same experiment with pure bisulphide, moving the two glasses from time to time in such a manner that the ants had to pass the first violet glass in order to reach that over which was the bisulphide. At 8.30 the ants were all under the glass over which was the bisulphide of carbon: I then changed the position. 8.45 ss »” 9 °° ” bP 9.15 os is ” 210 EXPERIMENTS WITH Although the bisulphide of carbon is so perfectly transparent, I then thought I would try it without the violet glass. I therefore covered part of the nest with violet glass, a part with a layer of bisulphide of carbon, moving them from time to time as before, and the ants in every case went under the bisulphide. I then reduced the thickness of the layer of bisul- phide to 54; of an inch, but still they preferred the bisulphide. Then thinking that possibly the one shelter being a plate of glass and the other a liquid might make a difference, I tried two similar bottles, one contain- ing water and the other bisulphide of carbon; but in every case the ants went under the bisulphide of carbon. On the other hand, when I used coloured solu- tions so deep in tint that the ants were only just visible through them, the ants went under the coloured liquids. October 10.--I uncovered the nest at 7 A.M., giving che ants an option between the bisulphide of carbon and various coloured solutions, taking for violet am- monio-sulphate of copper ; for red, a solution of carmine so deep in tint that the ants could only just be seen through it ; for green, a solution of chlorate of copper ; and for yellow, saffron. They were each separately tried with the bisulphide, and in every case the ants preferred the coloured solution. I now took successively red, yellow, and green glass; but in every case the ants preferred the glass to the bisulphide. Although, therefore, it would seem BISULPHIDE OF CARBON. 7A | from the previous experiments that the bisulphide darkened the nests to the ants more than violet glass, it would appear to do so less than red, green, or yellow. I now made some experiments in order, if possible, to determine whether the reason why the ants avoided the violet glass was because they disliked the colour violet, or whether it was because the violet glass trans- mitted more of the ultra-violet rays. For this purpose I placed a layer of the bisulphide of carbon over a piece of violet glass. By this arrange- ment I got the violet without the ultra-violet rays ; and I then contrasted this combination with other coloured media. First, I took a solution of bichromate of potash (bright orange), and placed it on a part of the nest, side by side with the violet glass and bisulphide of carbon. I should add that the bichromate of potash also cuts off the ultra-violet rays. In all the following observations I changed the position after each observation. At 1.30 p.m. the ants were under the bichromate. 3 sp 3 equally divided. 8 = A.M. 4, - under the bichromate 8.30 : 5 under the violet glass and bisulphide. 9 * i equally divided. 9.30 - Ee some under each, but most under the violet glass and bisulphide. P2 212 EXPERIMENTS WITH 9.45 A.M. the ants were equally divided. 10 39 ” 99 ” In this case, therefore, though without the layer of bisulphide the violet glass would always have been avoided, the result of placing the bisulphide over the violet glass was that the ants did not care much whether they were under the violet glass or under the bichromate of potash. I then took the same solution of carmine which I had already used. 10: The ants were under the carmine. 10.15 . a = 10.30 3 most under the carmine, but some under the violet. 10.45 aS under the carmine. nie _ most under the carmine, but some under the violet. Here, then, again the bisulphide made a distinct difference, though not so much so as with the bichro- mate of potash. I then took the solution of chlorate of copper already used. 1 The ants were equally divided. 1.30. The greater number were under the violet glass and bisulphide. 2. The greater number were under the violet glass and bisulphide. BISULPHIDE OF CARBON. 213 2.30. The greater number were under the violet glass and bisulphide. 3. Almost all were under the glass and bi- sulphide. The addition of the bisulphide thus caused the violet glass to be distinctly preferred to the chlorate of copper. I then took a solution of sulphate of nickel, almost exactly the same tint as, or a shade paler than, the chlorate of copper. At 3.45 the ants were under the violet glass and bisulphide. 4, bP) hy 2” 5. +b) 9 9 October 18. 7 A.M. 39 ” 39 8. The ants were equally divided. Here the effect was even more marked. I then took some saffron 1 inch in thickness and of a deep-yellow colour. 12.45 The ants were about half under each. 1. Most of the ants were under the violet glass and bisulphide. 1.15 ” ” ry) 2. Most of the ants were under the saffron. Here, again, we have the same result. I then tried the different-coloured glasses, all of which, as I had previously found, are unmistakably preferred to the violet. [t remained to be seen what 214 EXPERIMENTS WITH effect placing the bisulphide of carbon on the violet would have. First, I placed side by side, as usual, a piece of green glass and the violet glass covered with bisulphide of carbon :— Ist exp. The ants were equally divided, 2nd ,, They were under the violet glass and bisulphide. 3rd 399 39 > » 4th exp. Most of them were under the violet glass and bisulphide. 5th 99 99 393 9” Next, I tried pale-yellow glass. lst obs. The ants were almost all under the violet glass and bisulphide. 2nd ,, About three-quarters were _,, 55 3rd _,, They were all Py Ps 4th ,, About half were under each. I then took the dark-yellow glass. Ist obs. About half the ants were under the yellow glass and half under the violet glass and bisulphide. 2nd ,, Most of them were under the violet glass and bisulphide. ord: 5, = 5 yellow glass. 4th ,, 5 ‘5 violet glass and bisulphide. 5th ,, Equally divided. BISULPHIDE OF CARBON, 215 I now took deep-red glass. [st obs. The ants were under the red glass. 2nd ,, Half of the ants were under each. 3rd _,, Most of the ants were under violet glass and bisulphide. 4th ,, The ants were equally divided. It seemed evident, therefore, that while if violet glass alone was placed side by side with red, yellow, or green, the ants greatly preferred any of the latter, on the other hand, if a layer of bisulphide of carbon, which to our eyes is perfectly transparent, was placed over the violet glass, they then went as readily, or even more readily, under it than under other colours. In order to be sure that it was not the mere presence of a fluid, or the two layers of glass, to which this was due, I thought it would be well to try a similar series of experiments, using, however, a layer of similar thickness (1 inch) of water coloured light blue by ammonio-sulphate of copper. I therefore took again the piece of violet glass, over which I placed a flat-sided bottle, about 1 inch thick, containing a light-blue solution of ammonio-sulphate of copper; and, in contrast with it, I used the same coloured glasses as before. The difference, however, was very marked, the ants always preferring the red, green, and yellow to the violet. These experiments seem to demonstrate that in the previous series the ants were really influenced by 216 EXPERIMENTS WITH some difference due to the bisulphide of carbon, which affected their eyes, though not ours. I then thought it would be interesting to use, instead of the bisulphide, a solution of sulphate of quinine (4 dr. to 4 ounces), which differs from it in many points, but agrees in cutting off the ultra-violet rays. I used, as before, a layer about an inch thick, which I placed over violet glass, and then placed by its side the same coloured glasses as before. First, I took the red glass. Obs. 1. The ants were about equally divided. »5 2. Most of them were under the red glass. 55 3. Nearly equally divided ; rather more under the violet glass and sulphate of quinine than under the red glass. ”° 4. 99 9 bP) I now took the dark-yellow glass instead of the red. Obs. 1. Most of the ants were under the violet glass and sulphate of quinine. eo All i » 9 99 3. 99 3” bb] bb) Pele ATA - Ee yellow glass. bb) 5 bb} 29 39 ” », 6. All the ants were under the violet glass and sulphate of quinine. 55 ¢. Equally divided. », 8. Rather more under the violet glass and sulphate of quinine than under the yellow glass. BISULPHIDE OF CARBON. PY I then took the light- yellow glass instead of the dark. Obs. 1. The ants were all under the violet glass and sulphate of quinine. », 2. Rather more than half under the yellow glass, -» 3. Almost all under the violet glass and sulphate of quinine. » 4 All ” ” 99 9 I then took the green glass instead of the yellow. Obs. 1, They were under the violet glass and sulphate of quinine. 9 2. 9 9 9 5» 3. Equally divided. », 4. About three-quarters under the green glass. »5 9» Almost all under the violet glass and sulphate of quinine. Thus, then, while if the ants have to choose between the violet and other coloured glasses, they will always prefer one of the latter, the effect of putting over the violet glass a layer either of sul- phate of quinine or bisulphide of carbon, both of which are quite transparent to our eyes, but both of which cut off the ultra-violet rays, is to make the violet glass seem to the ants as good a shelter as any of the other glasses. This seems to me strong evidence that the ultra-violet rays are visible to the ants. I then tried similar experiments with a saturated solution of chrome alum and chromium chloride. These 218 CHROME ALUM AND CHROMIUM CHLORIDE. are dark greenish blue, very opaque to the visible light-rays, but transparent to the ultra-violet. I used a layer } inch thick, which was still so dark that 1] could not see the ants through it; and for comparison, a solution 1 inch thick of bisulphide of carbon, moving them after each observation as before. Exp. 1. The ants were under the bisulphide of 99 99 99 oe 9 Exp. 3. Most of the ants were under the bisulphide 4. 5. earbon. 29 9 9 of carbon. All but three x 5 All 33 >} I now took chromium chloride instead of alum. Exp. 1. 2: 9 CONF & Gr So) 10. 11. 12. Most were under the bisulphide of carbon. All 99 99 99 Almost all ,, 55 . . About three-fourths were under the chromium chloride. . All were under the chromium chloride. . About two-thirds as As . About one-half under each. . All under the bisulphide of carbon. . About three-fourths under the bisulphide of carbon. About half 5 2 All under the chromium chloride. A bisulphide of carbon. ANTS SENSITIVE TO ULTRA-VIOLET RAYS. 219 This result is very striking. It appears to show that though to our eyes the bisulphide of carbon is absolutely transparent, while the chrome alum and chromium chlo- ride are very dark, to the ants, on the contrary, the former appears to intercept more light than a layer of - the latter, which to our eyes appears dark green. The only experiments hitherto made with the view of determining the limits of vision of animals have been some by Prof. Paul Bert! on a small fresh-water erustacean belonging to the genus Daphnia, from which he concludes that they perceive all the colours known to us, being, however, specially sensitive to the yellow and green, and that their limits of vision are the same as ours. Nay, he even goes further than this, and feels justified in concluding from the experience of two widely divergent species—Man and Daphnia--that the limits of vision would be the same in all cases. His words are— A. ‘Tous les animaux voient les rayons spectraux que nous voyons.’ B. ‘Ils ne voient aucun de ceux que nous ne voyons pas.’ C. ‘Dans l’étendue de la région visible, les différ- ences entre les pouvoirs éclairants des différents rayons coloriés sont les mémes pour eux et pour nous.’ He adds, that ‘puisque les limites de visibilités semblent étre les mémes pour les animaux et pour nous, ' Arohiv. de Physiol. 1869, p. 547. 220 THE SENSE OF COLOUR. ne trouvons-nous pas 14 une raison de plus pour supposer que le réle des milieux de \’cil est tout-a-fait - secondaire, et que la visibilité tient 4 l’impressionnabilité de l’appareil nerveux lui-méme ?’ Such a generalisation would seem to rest on but a slight foundation; and I may add that I have made some experiments myself! on Daphnias which do not agree with those of M. Bert. On the contrary, I believe that the eyes of Daphnias are in this respect constituted like those of ants. These experiments seem to me very interesting. They appear to prove that ants perceive the ultra-violet rays. Now, as every ray of homogeneous light which we can perceive at all appears to us as a distinct colour, it becomes probable that these ultra-violet rays must make themselves apparent to the ants as a distinct and separate colour (of which we can form no idea), but as unlike the rest as red is from yellow, or green from violet. The question also arises whether white light to these insects would differ from our white light in containing this additional colour. At any rate, as few of the colours in nature are pure, but almost all arise from the combination of rays of different wave- lengths, and as in such cases the visible resultant would be composed not only of the rays which we see, but of these and the ultra-violet, it would appear that the colours of objects and the general aspect of nature 1 British Assoc. Report 1881, and Linnean Soc. Jowrn 1882. THE SENSE OF HEARING 221 must present to them a very different appearance from what it does to us. The Sense of Hearing. Many eminent observers have regarded the antenne of insects as auditory organs, and have brought forward strong evidence in favour of their view. I have myself made experiments on grasshoppers, which convinced me that their antenne serve as organs of hearing. So far, however, as Ants, Bees, and Waiips are con- eerned, the evidence is very conflicting. The power of hearing has indeed generally been attributed to them. Thus St. Fargeau, in his‘ Hist. Nat. des Hyménoptéres,’ ! thinks there can be no doubt on the subject. Bevan expresses, no doubt, the general opinion with reference to Bees, when he says that ‘ there is good evidence that Bees have a quick sense of hearing.’ ? As regards Wasps, Ormerod, who studied them 30 lovingly, came to the same conclusion.’ On the other hand, both Huber‘ and Forel 5 state that ants are quite deaf. As I have already men- tioned in the ‘Linnean Journal’ (vols. xii. and xiii.), I have never succeeded in satisfying myself that my ants, bees, or wasps heard any of the sounds with 1 Vol. i. p. 113. 2? The Honey Bee, p. 264, ® Nat. Hist. of Wasps, p. 72. 4 Nat. Hist. of Anta. 5 Fowrmis de la Suisse, p 121. 222 THE SENSE OF HEARING. which I tried them. I have over and over again tested them with the loudest and shrillest noises I could make, using a penny pipe, a dog-whistle, a violin, as well as the most piercing and startling sounds I could produce with my own voice, but all without effect. At the same time, I carefully avoided inferring from this that they are really deaf, though it certainly seems that their range of hearing is very different from ours. In order, if possible, to throw some light upon this interesting question, I made a variety of loud noises, including those produced by a complete set of tuning-forks, as near as possible to the ants mentioned in the preceding pages, while they were on their journeys to and fro between the nests and the larve. In these cases the ants were moving steadily and in a most business-like manner, and any start or alteration of pace would have been at once apparent. I was never able, however, to perceive that they took the slightest notice of any of these sounds. Thinking, however, that they might perhaps be too much absorbed by the idea of the larve to take any notice of my interruptions, I took one or two ants at random and put them on a strip of paper, the two ends of which were supported by pins with their bases in water. The ants imprisoned under these circumstances wandered slowly backwards and forwards along the paper As they did so, I tested them in the same manner as before, but was unable to perceive that they APPARENT DEAFNESS OF ANTS. 223 took the slightest notice of any sound which Y was able to produce. I then took a large female of F. ligniperda, and tethered her on a board to a pin by a delicate silk thread about 6 inches in length. After wandering about for a while, she stood still, and I then tried her in the same way; but, like the other ants, she took no notice whatever of the sounds. It is of course possible, if not probable, that ants, even if deaf to sounds which we hear, may hear others to which we are deaf. Having failed, therefore, in hearing them or making them hear me, I endeavoured to ascertain whether they could hear one another. To ascertain then if possible whether ants have the power of summoning one another by sound, I tried the following experiments. I put out (Sept. 1874) on the board where one of my nests of Lasius flavus was usually fed, six small pillars of wood about an inch and a half high, and on one of them I put some honey. A number of ants were wandering about on the board itself in search of food, and the nest itself was immediately above, and about 12 inches from, the board. I then put three ants to the honey, and when each had sufficiently fed I imprisoned her and put another; thus always keeping three ants at the honey, but not allowing them to go home. If then they could summon their friends by sound, there ought soon to be many ants at the honey. The results were as follow: 224 ATTEMPTS TO ASCERTAIN September 8.—Began at 11 am. Up to3 o'clock only seven ants found their way to the honey, while about as many ran up the other pillars. The arrival of these seven, therefore, was not more than would naturally result from the numbers running about close by. At 3 we allowed the ants then on the honey to return home. The result was that from 3.6, when the first went home, to 3.30, eleven came; from 3.30 to 4, no less than forty-three. Thus in four hours only seven came, while it was obvious that many would have wished to come, if they had known about the honey, because in the next three quarters of an hour, when they were informed of it, fifty-four came. On September 10 I tried the same again, keep- ing as before three ants always on the honey, but not allowing any to go home. From 12 to 5.30, only eight came. Those on the honey were then allowed to take the news home. From 5.30 to 6, four came; from 6 to 6.30, four ; from 6.30 to 7, eight ; from 7.30 to 8, no less than fifty-one. On September 23 we did the same again, begin- ning at 11.15. Up to 3.45 nine came. The ants on the honey were then allowed to go home. From 4 to 4.30 nine came; from 4.30 to 5, fifteen; from 5 to 5.30 nineteen; from 5.30 to 6, thirty-eight. Thus im three and a half hours only nine came; in two, when the ants were permitted to return, eighty-one. Again, on September 30 I tried the same arrange- ment, again beginning at 11. Up to 3.30 seven ants WHETHER ANTS CALL ONE ANOTHER. 225 came. We then allowed the ants which had fed to go home. From 3.30 to 4.30 twenty-eight came. From 4.30 to 5, fifty-one came. Thus in four hours and a half only seven came; while when the ants were allowed to return no less than seventy-nine came in an hour and a half. It seems obvious therefore that in these cases no communication was transmitted by sound. Again, Professor Tyndall was good enough to arrange for me one of his sensitive flames; but I could not perceive that it responded in any waytomyants. The experiment was not, however, very satisfactory, as I was not able to try the flame with a very active nest. Professor Bell most kindly set up for me an extremely sensitive microphone : it was attached to the underside of one of my nests; and though we could distinctly hear the ants walking about, we could not distinguish any other sound. It is, however, far from improbable that ants may produce sounds entirely beyond our range of hearing. Indeed, it is not impossible that insects may possess senses, or sensations, of which we can no more form an idea than we should have been able to conceive red or green if the human race had been blind. The human ear is sensitive to vibrations reaching at the outside to about 38,000 in a second. The sensation of red is produced when 470 millions of millions of vibrations enter the eye in a similar time; but between these two numbers, vibrations produce on us only the sensation of heat ; Q 426 EXPERIMENTS WITH SENSITIVE FLAME, we have no special organs of sense adapted to them. There is, however, no reason in the nature of things why this should be the case with other animals; and the problematical organs possessed by many of the lower forms may have relation to sensations which we do not perceive. If any apparatus could be devised by which the number of vibrations produced by any given cause could be lowered so as to be brought within the range of our ears, it is probable that the result would be most interesting. Moreover, there are not wanting observations which certainly seem to indicate that ants possess some sense of hearing. I am, for instance, indebted to Mr. Francis Galton for the following quotation from Colonel Long’s recent work on Central Africa.! ‘I observed,’ he says, ‘the manner of catching them’ (the ants, for food), ‘as here pictured’ (he gives a figure). ‘Seated round an ant- hole were two ver, pretty maidens, who with sticks beat upon an inverted gourd, “bourmah,” in cadenced time to a not unmusical song, that seduced from its hole the unwary ant, who, approaching the orifice, was quickly seized.’ The species of ant is not mentioned. Moreover, there are in the antenne certain remark- able structures, which may very probably be auditory organs. These curious organs (Fig. 6) were first noticed, 1 Central Africa, by Col. O CO. Long, p. 374. ANTS PROBABLY HEAR HIGH NOTES. 227 so far as I am aware, by Dr. J. Braxton Hicks in his ex- cellent paper on the ‘ Antenne of Insects,’ published in the 22nd volume of the ‘Linnzan Transactions ;’ and, again, by Dr. Forel in his ‘Fourmis de la Suisse. They certainly deserve more attention than they have yet received. The cork-shaped organs (Figs. 6 and 7, ¢ e) occur in allied species; but these stethoscope-like organs have not, so far as I am aware, been yet observed in other insects. They consist of an outer sac (Figs. 6 and 7, 8), of a long tube (¢), and a posterior chamber (w), to which is given a nerve (7). Forel! also describes these curious organs. He appears to consider that the number varies consider- Fig. 6 Terminal portion of antenna of Myrmica ruginodis 9 x 76. ably, namely, from 5 to 12. My own impression is that this difference is only apparent, and that in reality the numbers in each species vary little. Though ) Trans. of Linnean Soc., vol, xxii. p. 391. 2 Fourmis de la Suisse, p. 301. Qi 228 ORGANS OF SENSE sometimes the presence of air renders them very con- spicuous, they are in others by no means easy to make Fig. 7. Diagrammatic section through part of Fig. 6. e, chitinous skin of the antenna. ee, two of the cork-shaped organs. s, external chamber of one of the stethoscope-shaped organs. ¢, the tube. wm, the posterior sac. m, the nerve. out ; and I think that when a small number only are apparently present, this is probably due merely to the fact that the others are not brought out by the mode of preparation. In addition to the group of these organs situated in the terminal segment, there is one, or in some rare cases I have found two, in each of the small preceding segments. The tubes in these segments appeared to the eye to be nearly of the same length as those in the terminal segment, but I could not measure their exact length, as they do not lie flat. In some cases, when the segment was short, the tube was bent—an indica- tion, perhaps, that the exact length is of importance. It is possible that these curious organs may be audi- tory, and serve like microscopic stethoscopes. Professor Tyndall, who was good enough to examine them with me, concurred in the opinion that this was very pro- bable. I believe I am correct in saying that the bend- IN THE ANTENNZ OF ANTS. 229 ing of the tube in the short segments would make little difference in its mode of action. Kirby and Spence were, I believe, the first to notice that an insect allied to the ants (Mutilla Europea) has the power of making a. sibilant, chirping sound, but they did nct ascertain how this was effected. Goureau! subsequently called at- tention to the same fact, and attributed it to fric- tion of the base of the third segment of the abdo- men against the second. Westwood,? on the other hand, thought the sound was produced ‘ by the action of the large collar against the front of the mesothorax.. Darwin, in his ‘ Descent of Man,’ adopts the same view. ‘I find,’ he says,? ‘ that these surfaces (7.e. the over- lapping portions of the second and third abdominal segments) are marked with very fine concentric ridges, but so is the projecting thoracic collar, on which the head articulates ; and this collar, when scratched with the point of a needle, emits the proper sound.’ Landois, after referring to this opinion, expresses himself strongly in opposition to it. The true organ of sound is, he maintains,‘ a triangular field on the upper surface of the fourth abdominal ring, which is finely ribbed, and which, when rubbed, emits a stridulating sound. It certainly would appear, from Landois’ observations, that this structure does produce sound, whether or not 1 Ann. de la Soc. Ent. de France, 1837. 2 Modern Classifications of Insects, vol. it ® Descent of Man, vol. i. p. 366. 4 Phierstimmen, p. 132. 230 STRIDULATING APPARATUS we consider that the friction of the collar against the mesothorax may also assist in doing so. Under these circumstances, Landois asked himself whether other genera allied to Mutilla might not possess a similar organ, and also have the power of pro- ducing sound. He first examined the genus Ponera, which, in the structure of its abdomen, nearly resem- bles Mutilla, and here also he found a fully developed stridulating apparatus. He then turned to the true ants,! and here also he found a similar rasp-like organ in the same situation. It is indeed true that ants produce no sounds which are audible by us; still, when we find that certain allied insects do produce sounds appreciable to us by rubbing the abdominal segments one over the other; and when we find, in some ants, a nearly similar structure, it certainly seems not wunreasonable to conclude that these latter also do produce sounds, even though we cannot hear them. Landois describes Fig. 8. Attachment of abdominal segments of Lasius flavus § x 228 the structure in the workers of Lasius fuliginosus at haying 20 ribs in a breadth of 0°13 of a millimetre, 1 Some tropical ants are said to produce a chirping sound. ON ABDOMINAL SEGMENTS. 931 but he gives no figure. In Fig. 8 I have represented the junction of the second and third abdominal seg- ments in Lasius flavus, x 225, as shown in a longi- tudinal and vertical section. There are about ten well-marked ribs (7), occupying a length of approxi- mately ;4, of an inch. Similar ridges also occur between the following segments.! In connection with the sense of hearing I may men- tion another very interesting structure. In the year 1844, Von Siebold described? a remarkable organ which he had discovered in the tibie of the front legs of Gryllus, and which he considered to serve for the pur- pose of hearing. These organs have been also studied by Burmeister, Brunner, Hensen, Leydig, and others, and have recently been the subject of a monograph by Dr. V. Graber,? who commences his memoir by ob- serving that they are organs of an entirely unique cha- Fig. 9. S Tibia of Zasius flavus 5 x 75. racter, and that nothing corresponding to them occurs in any other insects, or indeed in any other Arthropods. 1 See also Sharp, 7rans. Ent. Soe., 1893. 2 Ueber das Stimm. und Gehororgan der Orthopteren, Wieg- mann’s Art. f. Natur., 1844. 8 Die Tympanalen Sinnesapparate der Orthopteren, von Dr. Vitua Graber, 1875. 232 REMARKABLE STRUCTURE IN I have therefore been very much interested by dis- “covering (1875) in ants a structure which seems in some remarkable points to resemble that of the Orthoptera. As will be seen from a glance at Dr. Graber’s memoir, and the plates which accompany it, the large trachea of the leg in the Orthoptera is con- siderably swollen in the tibia, and sends off, shortly after entering the tibia, a branch which, after running for some time parallel to the principal trunk, joins it again. See, for instance, in his monograph, plate ii., fig. 43; plate vi., fig. 69; plate vii., fig. 77; &e. Now, I have observed that in many other insects the {racheze of the tibia are dilated, and in several I have been able to detect a recurrent branch. The same is also the case in some mites. I will, however, reserve what I have to say on this subject, with reference to other insects, for another occasion, and will at present confine myself to the ants. If we examine the tibia, say of Lasius flavus, Fig. 9, we shall see that the trachea presents a remarkable arrangement, which at once reminds us of that which occurs in Gryllus and other Orthoptera. In the femur it has a diameter of about 555 of an inch; as soon, however, as it enters the tibia, it swells to a diameter of about z1, of an inch, then contracts again to ;4,, and then again, at the apical extremity of the tibia, once more expands to x4,- Moreover, as in Gryllus, so also in Formica, a small branch rises from the upper sac, runs almost THE TIBIA OF ANTS. 233 straight down the tibia, and falls again into the main trachea just above the lower sac. The remarkable sacs (Fig. 9, 8 8) at the two ex- tremities of the trachea in the tibia may also be well seen in other transparent species, such, for instance, as Myrmica ruginodis and Pheidole megacephala. At the place where the upper tracheal sac con- tracts (Fig. 9), there is, moreover, a conical striated organ (x), which is situated at the back of the leg, just at the apical end of the upper tracheal sac. The broad base lies against the external wall of the leg, and the fibres converge inwards. In some cases I thought I could perceive indications of bright rods, but I was never able to make them out very clearly. This also reminds us of a curious structure which is found in the tibiz of Locustide, between the trachea, the nerve, and the outer wall, and which is well shown in some of Dr. Graber’s figures. On the whole, then, though the subject is still involved in doubt, I am disposed to think that ants perceive sounds which we cannot hear. The Sense of Smell. I have also made a number of experiments on the power of smell possessed by ants. I dipped camel’s-hair brushes into peppermint-water, essence of cloves, layen- der-water, and other strong scents, and suspended them 234 THE SENSE OF SMELL about } of an inch above the strips of paper along which the ants were passing, in the experiments above recorded. Under these circumstances, while some of the ants passed on without taking any notice, others stopped when they came close to the pencil, and, evidently perceiving the smell, turned back. Soon, however, they returned and passed the scented pencil. After doing this two or three times, they generally took no further notice of the scent. This experiment left no doubt on my mind; still, to make the matter even more clear, I experi- mented with ants placed on an isolated strip of paper. Over the paper, and at such a distance as almost, but not quite, to touch any ant which passed under it, I again suspended a camel’s-hair brush, dipped in assa- foetida, lavender-water, peppermint-water, essence of cloves, and other scents. In this experiment the results were very marked; and no one who watched the behaviour of the ants under these circumstances could have the slightest doubt as to their power of smell. I then took a large female of F. ligniperda and tethered her on a board by a thread as before. When she was quite quiet I tried her with the tuning-forks ; but they did not disturb her in the least. I then ap- proached the feather of a pen very quietly, so as almost to touch first one and then the other of the antenne, which, however, did not move. I then dipped the pen in essence of musk and did the same; the antenna was slowly retracted and drawn quite back. I then THE SENSE OF SMELL. 235 repeated the same with the other antenna. If I touched the antenna, the ant started away, apparently smarting. I repeated the same with essence of laven- der, and with a second ant. The result was the same. Many of my other experiments—for instance, some of those recorded in the next chapter—point to the same conclusion ; and, in fact, there can be no doubt whatever that in ants the sense of smell is highly developed. CHAPTER IX. GENERAL INTELLIGENCE, AND POWER OF FINDING THEIR WAY. A NUMBER of interesting anecdotes are on record as to the ingenuity displayed by ants under certain circum- stances. M. Lund, for instance, tells the following story as bearing on the intelligence of ants: '— ‘Passant un jour prés d’un arbre presque isolé, je fus surpris d’entendre, par un temps calme, des feuilles qui tombaient comme de la pluie. Ce qui augmenta mon étonnement, c’est que les feuilles détachées avaient leur couleur naturelle, et que l’arbre semblait jouir de toute sa vigueur. Je m’approchai pour trouver |’expli- cation de ce phénoméne, et je vis qu’& peu prés sur chaque pétiole était postée une fourmi qui travaillait de toute sa force; le pétiole était bientét coupé et la feuille tombait par terre. Une autre scéne se passait au pied de l’arbre: la terre était couverte de fourmis occupées 4 découper les feuilles 4 mesure qu’elles tom- baient, et les morceaux étaient sur le champ transportés dans le nid. En moins d’une heure le grand ceuvre » Ann. des Sci. Nat. 1831, p. 112, ECONOMY OF LABOUR. 237 saccomplit sous mes yeux, et l’arbre resta entiérement dépouillé.’ Bates ' gives an apparently similar, but really very different account. ‘The Saiiba ants,’ he says, ‘ mount the tree in multitudes, the individuals being all worker-minors. Each one places itself on the surface of a leaf, and cuts with its sharp scissor-like jaws a nearly semicircular incision on the upper side; it then takes the edge between its jaws, and by a sharp jerk detaches the piece. Sometimes they let the leaf drop to the groun4, where a little heapaccumulates, until carried off by another relay of workers; but, generally, each marches off with the piece it has operated upon.’ Dr. Kerner recounts? the following story communi- cated to him by Dr. Gredler of Botzen :— ‘One of his colleagues at Innsbriick, says that gentleman, had for months been in the habit of sprink- ling pounded sugar on the sill of his window, for a train of ants, which passed in constant procession from the garden to the window. One day, he took it into his head to put the pounded sugar into a_ vessel, which he fastened with a string to the transom of the window; and, in order that his long-petted insects might have information of the supply suspended above, a number of the same set of ants were placed with the sugar in the vessel. These busy creatures forthwith ' Naturalist on the Amazons, vol. i. p. 26. 2 Flawers and their Unbidden Guests, Dr. A. Kerner. Trans. by W. Ogle, 1878, p. 21. 238 STATEMENT BY seized on the particles of sugar, and soon discovering the only way open to them, viz. up the string, over the transom and down the window-frame, rejoined their fellows on the sill, whence they could resume the old route down th. steep wall into the garden. Before long the route over the new track from the sill to the sugar, by the window-frame, transom, and string was completely established; and so passed a day or two without anything new. Then one morning it was noticed that the ants were stopping at their old place, that is, the window-sill, and getting sugar there. Not a single individual any longer traversed the path that led thence to the sugar above. This was not because the store above had been exhausted ; but because some dozen little fellows were working away vigorously and incessantly up aloft in the vessel, dragging the sugar crumbs to its edge, and throwing them down to their comrades below on the sill, a sill which with their limited range of vision they could not possibly see |’ Leuckart also made a similar experiment. Round a tree which was frequented by ants, he spread a band soaked in tobacco water. The ants above the band after awhile let themselves drop to the ground, but the ascending ants were long baffled. At length he saw them coming back, each with a pellet of earth in its mouth, and thus they constructed a road for them- selves, over which they streamed up the tree. PREVIOUS OBSERVERS. 239 Dr. Biichner records the following instance on the authority of a friend (M. Theuerkauf) :— ‘A maple tree standing on the ground of the manufacturer, Vollbaum, of Elbing (now of Dantzic) swarmed with aphides and ants. In order to check the mischief, the proprietor smeared about a foot width of the ground round the tree with tar. The first ants who wanted to cross naturally stuck fast. But what did the next? They turned back to the tree and carried down aphides, which they stuck down on the tar one after another until they had made a bridge, over which they could cross, the tar-ring without danger. The above-named merchant, Vollbaum, is the guarantor of this story, which I received from his own mouth on the very spot whereat it occurred.”! In this case I confess I have my doubts as to the interpretation ‘of the fact. Is it not possible that as the ants descended the tree, carrying the aphides, the latter naturally stuck to the tar, and would certainly be left there. In the same way I have seen hundreds of bits of earth deposited on the honey with which I fed my ants. On one occasion Belt observed? a community of leaf-cutting ants (C/codoma), which was in the process of moving from one nest to another. ‘ Between the old burrows and the new one was a steep slope. In- stead of descending this with their burdens, they cast » Mind in Animals, by Prof. Ludwig Biichner, p. 120. ” Naturalist in Nicaragua, O. Belt, p. 76. 240 EXPERIMENTS AS TO POWERS them down on the top of the slope, whence they rolled to the bottom, where another relay of labourers picked them up and carried them to the new burrow. It was amusing to watch the ants hurrying out with bundles of food, dropping them over the slope, and rushing back immediately for more.’ ; With reference to these interesting statements, I tried the following experiment :— October 15 (see Fig. 10)—At a distance of 10 inches from the door of a nest of Lasius niger I fixed Fig. 10. an upright ash wand 3 feet 6 inches high (a), and from the top of it b I suspended a second, rather shorter wand (b). To the lower end of this @ second wand, which hung just over the ¢ entrance to the nest (c), I fastened a flat glass cell (@) in which I placed a number of larve, and to them I put three or four specimens of L. niger. The drop from the glass cell to the upper part of the frame was only } an inch; still, though the ants reached over and showed a great anxiety to take this short cut home, they none of them faced the leap, but all went round by the sticks, a distance of nearly 7 feet. At 6 P.M. there were over 550 larve in the glass cell, and I reduced its distance from the upper surface of the nest to about # of an inch, so that the ants could even touch the glass with their antenna, but could not reach up nor step down. Still, though the drop was so small, they all went round. At 1] P.M. the OF ECONOMISING LABOUR. 241 greater number of the larvee had been carried off, so I put a fresh lot in the cell. The ants were busily at work. Next morning at 3 a.M. I visited them again, They were still carrying off the larve, and all going round. At 6 1.M. the larve were all removed. I put a fresh lot, and up to 9 a.m. they went on as before. The following day (October 17) I took two longer sticks, each 6 feet 6 inches in length, and arranged them in a similar manner, only horizontally instead of vertically. JI also placed fine earth under the glass supporting the larve. At 8 o’clock I placed an ant on the larve; she took one, and I then coaxed her home along the sticks. She deposited her larva and im- mediately came out again, not, however, going along the stick, but under the larva, vainly reaching up and endeavouring to reach the glass. At 8.30 I put her on the larvee again, and as she evidently did not know her way home, but kept stretching herself down ana trying to reach the earth under the glass cell, I again coaxed her home along the sticks. At 9.3 she came out again, and again went under the larvee and wandered about there. At 101 put her on the larve and again helped her home. At 10.15 she came out again, ana this time went to the stick, but still wanted some guidance. At 10.45 she again reached the frame, but immediately came out again, and I once more coaxed her round. After wandering about some time with a larva in her jaws, she dropped down at 11.14. After depositing her larva, she came out directly and went R 242 WANT OF INGENUITY IN ASSISTING under the larve. I again coaxed her round, and this time also she dropped off the glass with her larva. At 12.30 she came out again, and for the last time I helped her round. After this she found her way by herself. At 12.20 another (No. 2) found her way round and returned at 12.37. For the next hour their times were as follows :— No. 1. No. 2. 12.46 12.47 12.54 12.54 1. O ity 3 Lied 1. 8 1.12 1.14 1.19 1.21 1.26 1.28 1.32 1.34 1.38 1.41 1.45 1.47 1.52 1.54 Thus they both made 9 visits in an hour. As regards actual pace, I found they both did about 6 feet ONE ANOTHER OVER CHASMS, 243 in a minute. Soon after these began, other ants came with them. It was a beautiful day, and all my ants were unusually active. At 1 P.M. I counted 10 on the sticks at once, by 1.30 over 30, and at 5 in the after- noon over 60. They went on working very hard, and forming a continuous stream till I went to bed at 11; and at 4 in the morning I found them still at work; but though they were very anxious and, especially at first, tried very hard to save themselves the trouble of going round, they did not think of jumping down, nor did they throw the larvze over the edge. Moreover, as I had placed some sifted mould under the glass, a minute’s labour would have been sufficient to heap up one or two particles, and thus make a little mound which would have enabled them to get up and down without going round. A mound }# inch high would have been sufficient; but it did not occur to them to form one. The following morning (October 18) I put out some larvee again at 6 A.M. Some of the ants soon came; and the same scene continued tili 11.30 a.m., when I left off observing. Again, on October 22, I siaced a few larve in a glass, which I kept continually replenished, which was suspended 4 of an inch above the surface of the frame containing their nest, but only connected with it by tapes five feet long. I then, at 6.30, put a L. niger to the larve; she took one and tried hard to reach down, but could not do so, and would not jump; so I B 2 244 WANT OF INGENUITY IN coaxed her round the tapes. She went into the nest, deposited her larva, and immediately came out again. I put her back on the larve at 7.15; she took one, and again tried hard, but ineffectually, to reach down. I therefore again coaxed her round. She went into the nest, deposited her larva, and came out again directly as before. I put her back on the larve at 7.35, when the same thing happened again. She got back to the nest at 7.40, and immediately came out again. This time she found her way round the string, with some help from me, and reached the larvee at 7.50. I helped her home for the last time. The next journey she found her way without assistance, and reached the larve at 8.26. After this she returned as follcws, viz. :— At 8.50 9. 0 9.10 9.17 9.28 I now made the length of the journey round the tapes 10 feet. This puzzled her a little at first. She returned as follows :— 9.4] | 10.35 9.55 i" 10.44 S1028 | 10.54 10.16 | Ll. 6 10.26 11.14 witha friend CONSTRUCTING BRIDGES. 245 I now increased the length to 16 feet, and watched her while she made thirty journeys backwards and forwards. She also brought during the time seven friends with her. It surprised me very much that she sa ioreattc to go so far round rather than to face so short a drop. In illustration of the same curious fact, I several times put specimens of L. niger on slips of glass raised only one-third of an inch from the surface of the nest. They remained sometimes three or four hours running about on the glass, and at last seemed to drop off accidentally. Myrmica ruginodis has the same feeling. One morning, for instance, I placed one in an isolated position, but so that she could escape by dropping one- third of an inch. Nevertheless at the same hour on the following morning she was still in captivity, having remained out twenty-four hours rather than let herself down this little distance. Again I filled a saucer (woodcut, Fig. 11, s) with water and put in it a block of wood (w), on the top of which I fastened a projecting wooden rod (8B), on the end of which I placed a shallow glass cell (A) containing several hundred larvee. From this cell I allowed a slip of paper (P) to hang down to within 3, of an inch of the upper surface of the nest. At one side I put another block of wood (c) with a lateral projection (D) which hung over the cell containing the larve. T then made a connexion between D and 4, so that ants 246 WANT OF INGENUITY could ascend ¢, and, passing over D, descend upon the larvee. I then put some specimens of Lasius niger to the larve, and soon a large number of ants were en- gaged in carrying off the larva. When this had con- tinued for about three hours, I raised p 58 of an inch above A. The ants kept on coming and tried hard to reach down from D to a, which was only just out of their reach. Two or three, in leaning over, lost their foothold and dropped into the larve; but this was obviously an accident; and after a while they all gave up their efforts, and went away, losing their prize, in spite of most earnest efforts, rather than drop 53; of an inch. At the moment when the separation was made there were fifteen ants on the larve. These could, of course, have returned if one had stood still and allowed the others to get on its back. This, however, did not occur to them; nor did they think of letting themselves drop from the bottom of the paper on to the nest. Two or three, indeed, fell down, I have no doubt, by accident ; but the remainder wandered about, until at length most of them got into the water. After a time the others abandoned altogether as hopeless the attempt to get at the larvee. I waited about six hours, and then again placed the IN CONSTRUCTING BRIDGES, 247 glass (A) containing the larve so as to touch the piece of wood (D), and again put some ants to the larve. Soon a regular string of ants was established; when I again raised the wood (D) 58; of an inch above the glass (A), exactly the same result occurred. The ants bent over and made every effort to reach the larvae, but did not drop themselves down, and after a while again abandoned all hope of getting the larve. In order to test their intelligence, it has always seemed to me that there was no better way than to ascertain some object which they would clearly desire, and then to interpose some obstacle which a little ingenuity would enable them to overcome. Following up, then, the preceding observations, I placed some larve in a cup which I put on a slip of glass surrounded by water, but accessible to the ants by one pathway in which was a bridge consisting of a strip of paper % inch long and 4 inch wide. Having then put a Lasvus niger from one of my nests to these larve, she began carrying them off, and by degrees a number of friends came to help her. I then, when about twenty-five ants were so engaged, moved the little paper bridge slightly, so as to leave a chasm, just so wide that the ants could not reach across. They came and tried hard to do so; but it did not occur to them to push the paper bridge, though the distance was only about 4 inch, and they might easily have done so. After trying for about a quarter of an hour, they gave up the attempt and re- turned home. This I repeated several times. 248 WANT OF INGENUITY Then, thinking that paper was a substance to which they were not accustomed, I tried the same with a bit of straw 1 inch long and } inch wide. The result was the same. I repeated this more than once. Again I suspended some honey over a nest of Lasius flavus at a height of about 4 an inch, and accessible only by a paper bridge more than 10 feet long. Under the glass I then placed a small heap of earth. The ants soon swarmed over the earth on to the glass, and began feeding on the honey. I then removed a little of the earth, so that there was an interval of about 4 of an inch between the glass and the earth; but, though the distance was so small, they would not jump down, but preferred to go round by the long bridge. They tried in vain to stretch up from the earth to the glass, which, however, was just out of their reach, though they could touch it with their antenne ; but it did not occur to them to heap the earth up a little, though if they had moved only half a dozen particles of earth they would have secured for them- selves direct access to the food. This, however, never occurred to them. At length they gave up all attempts to reach up to the glass, and went round by the paper bridge. I left the arrangement for several weeks, but they continued to go round by the long paper bridge. Again I varied the experiment as follows :—Having left a nest without food for a short time, I placed some honey on a small wooden brick surrounded by a little moat of glycerine $4 an inch wide and about =, of IN CONSTRUCTING EARTHWORKS. 249 an inch in depth. Over this moat I then placed a paper bridge, one end of which rested on some fine mould. I then put an ant to the honey, and soon a little crowd was collected round it. I then removed the paper bridge; the ants could not cross the glycerine; they came to the edge and walked round and round, but were unable to get across, nor did it occur to them to make a bridge or bank across the glycerine with the mould which I had placed so conveniently for them. I was the more surprised at this on account of the ingenuity with which they avail themselves of earth for constructing their nests. For instance, wishing, if possible, to avoid the trouble of frequently moistening the earth in my nests, I supplied one of my communities of Lasvus flavus with a frame containing, instead of earth, a piece of linen, one portion of which projected beyond the frame and was immersed in water. The linen then sucked up the water by capillary attraction, and thus the air in the frame was kept moist. The ants approved of this arrangement, and took up their quarters in the frame. To minimize evaporation I usually closed the frames all round, leaving only one or two small openings for the ants, but in this case I left the outer side of the frame open. The ants, however, did not like being thus exposed ; they therefore brought earth from some little distance, and built up a regular wall along the open side, blocking up the space between the upper and lower plates of glass, and leaving only one or two small openings for themselves. This struck 250 INGENUITY IN BUILDING NESTS. me as very ingenious. The same expedient was, more- over, repeated under similar circumstances by the slaves belonging to my nest of Polyergus. The facility or difficulty with which ants find their way, while it partly falls within the section of the subject dealing with their organs of sense, is also closely connected with the question of their general intelligence. Partly, then, in order to test how far they are guided by sight, partly to test their intelligence, I made various observations and experiments, the ac- companying woodcuts being reduced copies of tracings of some of the routes followed by the ants during the course of the observations. I may here note that the diagrams Figs. 12-17 are careful reductions of large tracings made during the experiments. Though not absolutely correct in every minute detail of contour, they are exact for all practical purposes. As the ants pursued their way, pencil-mark- ings in certain instances, and coloured lines in others, were made so as to follow consecutively the paths pursued. Experiment 1.—February. On a table communi- cating with one of my nests (see Fig. 12)I placed upright a common cylindrical lead pencil } inch in diameter and 7 inches long, fastened with sealing-wax to a penny piece. Close to the base of the pencil (4) I brought the end of a paper bridge (B) leading to the nest, and then placed a shallow glass with larve at C, DIFFICULTY IN FINDING WAY. 251 4 inches from the base of the pencil. I then put an ant to the larve; when she had become acquainted with the road, she went very straight, as is shown in the woodcut (Fig. 12). In one case, at the point £, she dropped her larva and returned for another. When Fig. 12 Routes followed in experiment No.1, as detailed above. A, position of pencil. 3B, paper bridge. c and D, glass with larve. E, point where larva dropped, the opposite arrow and loop marking return route. 1,2, 3,4, comparatively straight paths to the glass, 6, 6, circuitous route on shifting of glass. , different access to nest, she returned on the next journey and was on the glass, [ moved it 3 inches, to D, so that the end of the glass was 6 inches from the base of the pencil. If she were much guided by sight, then she would have had little 252 DIFFICULTY IN or no difficulty in finding her way back. Her pathway, however (No. 5), which is traced on the paper, shows that she was completely abroad ; and, after all, she got hack to the nest by a different route. Fig. 13. Routes followed in experiment No. 2, as menticned in text. B, paper bridge leading to nest. C, glass tray with larve, in its first position ; and D in its position when shifted, 1, 2, 3, 4, thin white lines indicating the comparatively straight routes. 5, thick white line, and 6, dotted line showing tortuous paths when glass had been altered in position. The arrows indicate directions travelled FINDING THEIR WAY. 253 I then varied the experiment as subjoined, and as shown in the woodcut (Fig. 13). Experiment 2.—I connected the table with the nest by a paper bridge, the end of which is shown at B (Fig. 13), and which came down about an inch from the pole supporting the nest (see Fig. 1). This pole rose 18 inches above the table. I then put the glass tray (C) with larve as before, 12 inches from the base of the pole, and put an ant to the larve. When she had learnt her way I traced four of her routes, as shown in the thin lines 1, 2, 3,4. I then on her next journey (5, thick white line), when she was on the tray (C), moved it three inches to D, as shown in the figure, and again traced her route. The contrast is very striking between the relatively straight thin white lines 1, 2, 3, 4 of the four journeys when familiar with the road; whereas in the broad white line No. 5 the zigzag twistings show how much difficulty the ant experienced in finding her way. When she re- turned I again moved the tray as before, and the dotted sinuous white line (6) shows the course she followed. Experiment 3.—I then again varied the experi- ment as follows:—I placed the larve in a small china cup on the top of the pencil, which thus formed a column 73 inches high. The cross line close to the arrows (Fig. 14) is as before, the base of the paper bridge leading to the nest. shows the position of the penny on which the pencil was supported. The dotted white lines 1, 2, 3,4 show the routes of a marked ant on four 254 SIGHT LITTLE USED successive journeys from the nest to the base of the pencil. Ithen moved the pencil 6 inches to D, and the two following routes are marked 5 and 6. In one of them, 5 (thick white line), the ant found a stray Routes followed in experiment No. 3, as described in text. The line at the six arrows represents a paper bridge going to nest. C, china cup on top of pencil. D, pencil moved. &, place where a stray larva was found. 1, 2,3, 4, dotted lines show the nearly direct journeys. 65, thick white line (crossing c in black) of route returning to nest, the ant having picked up a stray larva at B. 6 yery circuitous thin white line of track from nest to pencil D. IN FINDING THEIR WAY. 255 larva at E, with which she returned to the nest, without finding the pencil at all. On the following journey, shown in the fine white zigzag line (6), she found the pencil at last, but, as will be seen, only after many meanderings. A, first position of pencil. 8B, second position of pencil. 1, 2 straight lines of two tracks of the observed ants, 3, Winding narrow white line, showing course pursued by the same ant before arriving at B, when the position of the pencil was unchanged, Experiment 4.-I then repeated the observation 256 SIGHT LITTLE USED on three other ants (see Figs. 15-17) with the same result: the second was 7 minutes before she found the pencil, and at last seemed to do so accidentally; the third actually wandered about for no less than half an hour (Fig. 15), returning up the paper bridge several times. Other experiments somewhat similar to the pre- Fig. 16. Diagram representing three tracks of an ant in another experiment. A, the first position of pencil and the food, towards which and from the base-line of nest 1 and 2 lead by nearly direct broadish white lines to A. When the latter was removed to B the ant, in its effort to reach this, pursued the narrow white winding line ending in3—> ceding, the results of which are shown in the figures 16 and 17, seem to prove that this species of ant, at any IN FINDING THEIR WAY. 257 rate, guides itself but little by sight. This, which I had not at all anticipated, seems to follow from the fact that after the pencil and tray of larve had been removed but a short distance to the right or left, the Another tracing showing a similar experiment. 1, 2, 3, the direct broad lines towards A; and 4, the complicated track made when reservoir of larvze was removed to B. ants on their journey to the shifted object travelled very often backwards and forwards and around the spot where the coveted object first stood. Then they would retrace their steps towards the nest, wander hither and S 258 IMPORTANCE OF SCENT. thither from side to side between the nest and the point A, and only after very repeated efforts around the original site of the larve reach, as it were accidentally, the object desired at B. Another evidence of this consists in the fact that if when ants (LZ. niger) were carrying off larvee placed ina | cup ona piece of board, I turned the board round so that the side which had been turned towards the nest was away from it, and vice versa, the ants always returned over the same track on the board, and, in ccnsequence, directly away from home. If I moved the board to the other side of my artificial nest, the result wasthesame. Evidently they followed the road, not the direction. In order further to test how far ants are guided by sight and how much by scent, I tried the following ex- periment with Lasius niger. Some food was put out at the point a on a board measuring 20 inches by 12 (Fig. Fig. 18. 18), and so arranged that the ants in going straight to it from the nest would reach the board at the point b, and after passing under a paper tunnel, c, would proceed between five pairs of wooden bricks, each 3 inches in length and 13 in height. When they got to know their way, they went quite straight along the line de to a. The board was IMPORTANCE OF SCENT. 259 then twisted as shown in Fig.19. The bricks and tunnel being also rearranged so that they were exactly in the same direction as before, but the board having been moved, the line d e was now outside them. This change, however, did not at all discom- Fig. 19. pose the ants; but instead of going, as before, through the tunnel and between , the rows of bricks to a, they walked exactly along the old path to e. I then arranged matters as before, but without the tunnel and with only three pairs of bricks (Fig. 20). When an ant had got quite used to the path d to eI altered the position of the bricks and food, as shown in Fig. 21, mak- ing a difference of 8 inches in the position of the latter. The ant came as tefore, walked up to the first brick, touched it with her antenne, but then followed her old line to a. From there she veered towards the food, and very soon found it. When she was gone, I altered it & 2 260 THE SENSE OF DIRECTION. again, as shown in Fig. 22; she returned after the usual interval, and went again straight to a; then, after some Fig. 21. wanderings, to f, and ° at length, but only after a lapse of 2€ minutes, found the food at g. These ex- periments were re- peated more than once, and always with simi- lar results. I then varied matters by re- moving the bricks, which, however, did not seem to make any dif- ference to the ants. I then accustomed some ants (Lasius ni- ger) to go to and fro over a wooden bridge, b,¢ (Fig. 23), to some food. Fig. 23 || a When they had got quite accustomed to the way, I watched when an ant was on the bridge and then turned it round, so that the end b was atc, andcatb. In most cases the ant immediately turned round also; but even if she went on to 0 or c, as the case may be, as EXPERIMENTS, 261 soon as she came to the end of the bridge she turned round. I then modified the arrangement, placing between the nest and the food three similar pieces of wood. Then when the ant was on the middle piece, I trans- posed the other two. To my surprise this did not at all disconcert them. I then tried the arrangement shown in Fig. 24. Fig. 24. a is a paper bridge leading tothe nest ; 6 is a board about 22 inches long by 13 broad, on which is a disk of white paper fastened at the centre by a pin d; e ig some food. When the ants had come to know their way so that they passed straight over the paper disk on their way from a to e, I moved the disk round with an ant on it, so that f came to g andgto/f. As before, the ants turned round with the paper. As it might be possible that the ants turned round on account of the changed relative position of external objects, I next substituted a circular box 12 inches in diameter, open at the top, and 262 EXPERIMENTS WITH 7 inches high (in fact, a hat-box) for the flat paper, cutting two small holes at f and g, so that the ants passing from the nest to the food went through the box entering at f and coming out at g. The box was fixed Fig. 25. 9 at d, so that it might turn easily. I then, when they had got to know their way, turned the box round as soon as an ant had entered it, but in every case the Fig. 26. ant turned round too, thus retaining her direction. I then varied the experiment as shown in Figs. 25 and 26. I replaced the white disk of paper, but put the food e at the middle of the board. When the ant had ROTATING DISKS. 263 got used to this arrangement I waited till one was on the disk (Fig. 25) and then gently drew it to the other side of e, as shown in Fig. 26. In this case, however, the ant did not turn round, but went on to g, when she seemed a good deal surprised at finding where she was. In continuation of the preceding experiments I constructed a circular table 18 inches in diameter It consisted, as shown in Figs. 27 and 28, of three concentric pieces—a central F G, an intermediate DE, H I, and an outer piece B ©, K L, each of these Fig. 27. three pieces being capable of separate rotation. This arrangement was kindly devised for me by Mr. Francis Galton. I then connected the table with a nest of Lasius niger by a paper bridge a, and also made a paper path across the table, as shown in Fig. 28, divided into five pieces corresponding to the divisions of the table. This I did because I found that the ants wandered less if they were provided with a paper road than if they walked actually on the wood itself. I then placed a cup containing larvz un the table at B, and put an ant on 264 EXPERIMENTS WITH the larve. She at once picked one up, and, with some little guidance from me, carried it off to the nest, returning at once for another, bringing some friends with her to help. When she knew her way, I gradually moved the cup across the table along the paper path Fig. 28. to M, placing it on a column five inches high. After a while the ants came to know the way quite well, and passed straight along the path from the nest to the larve at M. Having thus established a service of ants, I tried the following experiments :— 1. I removed the piece of paper @ F. This dis- ROTATING TABLE. 265 turbed them; but they very soon re-established the chain. 2. I turned round the central piece of the table @ F, so that the paper G F was reversed, G being where F had been, and vice versd. This did not seem to diconcert the ants at all. They went straight over the paper as before, without a moment’s hesitation 3. When some ants were between I and D, I rotated the outer circle of the table halfway round, which of course carried the cup containing the larve from L to B. The ants took no notice of this, but went straight to L. 4. When some ants were between I and D, I rotated the table several times, bringing it finally to its original position. This disturbed them a good deal ; but eventually they all continued their course to L. 5. When some ants were between I and p, I half rotated the two centre parts of the table, the result of which, of course, was that the ant was moving to- wards, instead of away from, the nest. In every case the ants turned round too, so as duly to reach L. So also those which were on their way back from the larve to the nest turned in the same manner. 6. When the ants were between I and p,I half rotated the whole table. Again the ants turned round too, though of course in this case, when they reached the place where L had been, the cup with the larve was behind them at B. The two latter experiments, though quite in accord- ance with those previously made, puzzled me a good 266 EXPERIMENTS WITH deal. Experiment 3, as well as some of those recorded previously, seemed to show that ants were little guided in such cases by the position of surrounding objects. However, I was anxious to test this. 7. Accordingly I took a round box and placed it upside down on the table, having cut two niches, one at, each side, where it lay on the paper path, so as to afford a passage for the ants, as in the experiments recorded in my previous paper; but on this occasion I left the lid on, cutting, however, a hole through which I could watch the result. In this case, therefore, the surrounding objects, t.e. the walls of the box, turned round with the table. Then, as before, when the ants were between I and D, I turned the table half round. The results were as follows:— | Ants which Ants which | turned did not turn Experiment 1 1 2 | of 2 1 1 ap 3 1 1 | rf 4 4 2 4 5 0 1 on 6 0) 1 ” if 0 3 3 8 1 1 D 9 | 0 | 1 re 10 2 | 2 | 7 11 | 1 1 ” 12 | 0 3 | | } ul 19 | In this case, then, only J1 ants turned; and as 4 of them were together, it is possible that 3 simply A ROTATING BOX, 267 followed the first. Moreover, the ants which turned did so with much more hesitation and less immediately. 8. For comparison, I then again tried the same experiment, but without the box. The results were as follows: - : nts whicl Ants w Observation eens 1 eae welel. 1 0 2 0 3 1? 4 0 0 6 0 Under these circumstances, therefore, all the ants but one certainly turned, and her movements were undecided. From these last two experiments it is obvious that the presence of the box greatly affected the result, and yet the previous results made it difficult to suppose that the ants noticed any objects so distant as the walls of the rooms, or even as I was myself. The result surprised me considerably ; but I think the explanation is given by the following experiments. I again put some larve in a cup, which I placed in the centre of the table; and I let out an ant which I had imprisoned after the previous experiments, placing her in the cup; she carried off a larva to the nest and soon returned. When she was again in the cup I half rotated the table: when she came out she seemed a 268 EFFECT OF LIGHT. little surprised ; but after walking once round the cup, started off along the paper bridge straight home. When she returned to the cup I again half rotated the table. This time she went back quite straight. When she had come again, I once more half rotated the table; she returned quite straight. Again the same happened. A second ant then came: I half rotated the table as before. She went wrong for about an inch and a half, but then turned round and went straight home. I was working by the light of two candles which were on the side of the table towards the nest. The next time the two ants came I half rotated the table as before, and moved the candles to the far side. This time the ants were deceived, and followed the paper bridge to the end of the table furthest from the nest. This I repeated a second time, with the same result. I then turned the table as before without altering the lights, and the ants (four of them) went back all right. I then again turned the table, altering the lights, and the ant went wrong. I then altered the lights without rotating the table: the first ant went wrong; the second right; the third wrong; the fourth wrong; the fifth hesitated some seconds, and then went wrong; the sixth right; the seventh went all but to the edge the wrong way, but, after various wanderings, at last went right. When, therefore, the direction of the light was changed, but everything else left as before, out of seven ants, five were deceived and went in the wrong direction. After an interval of a week, on March 25, I arranged EFFECT OF LIGHT. 269 the nest and the rotating table as before, and let out three ants which I had imprisoned on the 19th, and which knew their way. I put them on the larve at m as before. The paper pathway had been left untouched. The ants examined the larve and then went straight home along the paper path; but, to my surprise, only one of them carried off a larva. Nevertheless they had evidently taken the news to the nest, for the ants at once began coming to the cup in considerable num- bers and carrying off the larve. Ido not altogether understand this proceeding, and unluckily had not marked the first three ants; so that I cannot tell whether they brought or sent their friends. It seems possible that they felt unequal to the exertion of carrying a burthen to the nest until they had had some food. When the ants were fairly at work I turned the table 90 degrees. In this case eight ants which were on their way to the larvee continued their march along the paper, while two turned back; but none left the paper and went across the table straight for the larvee. I then stopped the experiment for a while, so that the excitement might subside; as when the ants become too numerous it is not so easy to watch them. When all was quiet I put the cup with the larvse on the middle of the table, and covered the greater part of the table with the box as before. In a short time some ants again came to the larvae, and then, just as they were leaving the cup on their way home, I turned the table, as befure, half round. Under these circumstances, however, instead of 270 RELUCTANCE OF ANTS turning as in tke previous experiment, ten ants, one after another, continued their course, thus coming out of the box at the end furthest from the nest. When ten ants successively had, under these circumstances, gone wrong, to make the experiment complete, I tried in again, everything being the same, except that there was no box. Under these circumstances five ants, one after the other, turned directly the table was rotated. From these experiments, therefore, it seems clear that in determining their course the ants are greatly influenced by the direction of the light. March 27.—I let out. two ants imprisoned on the 25th, and placed them on the larve, which I put ona column 7 inches high, covered with blue paper, and communicating with the nest by the paper path (a, Fig. 29) arranged as usual, but supported on pins. At first I arranged it as shown below, placing the larvee at M, on a table 18 inches in diameter, Fig. 29. so that the ants, on arriving at the larvae, made nearly a semi- circle round the edge of the table. I then gradually moved +* the larve to m’ and afterwards to mM’. The ants, however, obviously knew that they were going unnecessarily round. They ran along the paper bridge in a very undecided manner, continually turning round and often coming down the TO GO OUT OF THEIR WAY. 271 pins ; while in returning to the nest they persistently came down the side of the pillar nearest to the nest, though I repeatedly attempted to guide them the other way. Even when placed on the paper bridge between M and mM, they were very dissatisfied. In fact, it was obvious that they knew they were being sent a long way round, and were attempting to make a shorter cut. I then again placed the larve on the column at M, and when the ants were once more going to and fro regularly along the paper path, I altered the position of the column and larve to mM’, placing the edge of the pillar, which the ants had been accustomed to ascend, towards the paper bridge, connecting it with the original bridge by a side- Fig. 30. bridge a, M being an inch from the original bridge. Under these circumstances three ants ran on to M; then two found their way over the bridge a to mM’. Of the next ten ants, five went to M and five over a to M’. The next ten all went over the paper bridge a to m’. I then put the pillar and the larve on the other side of the original paper path at mM”, connected with the main path by a short bridge a’, taking for a’ a new piece of paper, so that scent would be no guide. I left the little bridge a in its place. The ants went ag follows :— 272 ANTS TO SOME EXTENT To mM’ l To mM O Tou 0 rr 1 99 0 9 1 - 1 YL) sare %” Lt at 0 SG ERE »” 1 9 1 9 1 ” 0 SS) see il ” 1 99 0) ° (@) 1 a 0 pee fi) 1 eof iO aio 1 at ide!) Peay ti) ” l ye tO ‘ 1 ie 1 yO ) 1 Lae) < want) 12 5 is It seems clear, therefore, that though the ants did not trust so much to their eyes as a man would have done under similar circumstances, yet that they were to some extent guided by sight. I then removed all the paper pathways and put the Fig. 31. pillar tom. Of the first two ants which came to the table, the first found the pillar in five minutes, the second, after wandering about for a quarter of an hour, gave the search up in despair, and went home. I then moved the pillar to mM’, and watched the next ant that came on to the table; she found it in a minute or GUIDED BY SIGHT. 273 two. I then moved ittom”’. Two ants came tcgether. One found the pillar in 7 minutes; the other took no less than 25, although, as already mentioned, the table was only 18 inches in diameter. Obviously, therefore, though it seems clear that they are helped by sight, still these last observations support those previously re- corded, and show that in finding their way they do not derive by any means so much assistance from their eyes as we should under corresponding circumstances. Re NI a CHAPTER X. BEES. I ORIGINALLY intended to make my experiment prin- cipally with bees, but soon found that ants were on the whole more suitable for my purpose. In the first place, ants are much less excitable, they are less liable to accidents, and from the absence of wings are more easy to keep under continuous obser- vation. Still, I have made a certain number of observations with bees, some of which may be worth here recording. As already mentioned, the current statements with reference to the language of social insects depend much on the fact that when one of them, either by accident or in the course of its rambles, has discovered a stock of food, in a very short time many others arrive to profit by the discovery. This, however, does not necessarily imply any power of describing localities. If the bees or ants merely follow their more fortunate comrade, the matter is comparatively simple; if, on the con- trary, others are sent, the case becomes very different. In order to test this I proposed to keep honey in a given place for some time, in order to satisfy myself METHOD OF OBSERVATION. 275 that it would not readily be found by the bees; and then, after bringing a bee to the honey, to watch whether it brought others, or sent them—the latter of course implying a much higher order of intelligence and power of communication. I therefore placed some honey in a glass, close to an open window in my sitting-room, and watched it for sixty hours of sunshine, during which no bees came to it. I then, at 10 a.m. on a beautiful morning in June, went to my hives, and took a bee which was just starting out, brought it in my hand up to my room ‘a distance of somewhat less than 200 yards), and gave it some honey, which it sucked with evident enjoyment. After a few minutes it flew quietly away, but did not return ; nor did any other bee make its appearance. The following morning I repeated the same experi- ment. At 7.15 I brought up a bee, which sipped the honey with readiness, and after doing so for about four minutes flew away with no appearance of alarm or annoyance. It did not, however, return ; nor did any other bee come to my honey. On several other occasions I repeated the same experi- ments with alike result. Altogether I tried it more than twenty times. Indeed, I rarely found bees to return to honey if brought any considerable distance at once By taking them, however, some twenty yards each time they came to the honey, I at length trained them to come to my room. On the whole, however, I found it more con- tT 2 276 BEES DO NOT INVARIABLY venient to procure one of Marriott’s observatory hives, both on account of its construction, and also because I could have it in my room, and thus keep the bees more immediately under my own eye. My room is square, with three windows, two on the south-west side, where the hive was placed, and one on the south-east. Besides the ordinary entrance from the outside, the hive had a small postern door opening into the room; this door was provided with an alighting-board, and closed bya plug: as a general rule the bees did not notice it much unless the passage was very full of them. I then placed some honey on a table close to the hive, and from time to time fed certain bees on it. Those which had been fed soon got accustomed to come for the honey; but partly on account of my frequent absence from home, and partly from their difficulty in finding their way about, and their tendency to lose themselves, I could never keep any marked bee under observation for more than a few days. Out of a number of similar observations I will here mention a few and give them in detail in the Appendix, as throwing some light on the power of communicating facts possessed by the bees; they will also illustrate the daily occupations of a working bee. Experiment 1.—Thus, on August 24, 1874, I opened the postern door leading into my room at 6.45 a.M., and watched till 1 p.m. three bees, which had been trained to come to honey at a particular spot. They did not, however, know their way very well, and consequently BRING FRIENDS TO SHARE TREASURES. 277. lost a good deal of time. One made 23 journeys backwards and forwards between the hive and the honey, the second 13, and the third only 7. The following day I watched the first of these bees from 7.23 to 12.54, during which time she made 19 journeys. Scarcely any other bees came, but I did not record the exact number. Experiment 2.—I watched another bee from 6.55 A.M. till 7.15 p.mM., during which time she made 59 visits to the honey, and only one other bee came to it. Experiment 3.— Another from 7 a.m. till 3 P.M. ; she made 40 journeys, and only two other bees came. She returned the two following mornings, and was watched for three hours each day, during which time no other bee came. Expervment 4.—Another morning I watched a dif- ferent bee from 9.19 A.M. to 2 P.M.: she made 21 jour- neys, and no other bee came. Then, thinking that perhaps this result might be due to the quantity of honey being too small, I used a wide-mouthed jar, containing more than one pound of honey. Experiment 5.—I watched two bees from 1.44 till 4.30, during which time they made 24 journeys, but only one other bee came. Experiment 6.—Besides the honey in the jar I spread some out over two plates, so as to increase the surface. I watched a bee from 12.15 till 6.15 p.m. She 278 DIFFICULTY IN made 28 journeys, but did not bring a single friend with her. Experiment 7.—On July 19 I put a bee toa honey- comb which contained twelve and a half pounds of honey at 12.30, and which was placed in a corner of my room as far as possible from the window. That afternoon she made 22 visits to it, and no other bee came. The following morning she returned at 6.5 a.M., and I watched her till 2. She made 22 journeys, but did not bring a single friend with her. Experiment 8.—Another bee was also brought to the same honeycomb, watched from 2.30till 7.14. She made 14 journeys, but did not bring a single friend. I might give other similar cases, but these are, I think, sufficient to show that bees do not bring their friends to share any treasure they have discovered, so invariably as might be assumed from the statements of previous observers. Possibly the result is partly due to the fact that my room is on the first floor, so that the bees coming to it flew at a higher level than that generally used by their companions, and hence were less likely to be followed. Indeed, I have been a good deal surprised at the difficulty which bees experience in finding their way. For instance, I put a bee into a bell-glass 18 inches long, and with a mouth 6} inches wide, turning the closed end to the window; she buzzed about for an hour, when, as there seemed no chance of her getting out, I put her back into the hive. Two flies, on the — FINDING THEIR WAY. 279 contrary, which I put in with her, got out at once. At 11.30 I put another beeand a fly into the same glass; the latter flew out at once. For half an hour the bee tried to get out at the closed end; I then turned the glass with its open end to the light, when she flew out at once. To make sure, I repeated the experiment once more with the same result. Some bees, however, have seemed to me more in- telligent in this respect than others. A bee which I had fed several times, and which had flown about in the room, found its way out of the glass in a quarter of an hour, and when put in a second time came out at once. Another bee, when I closed the postern door which opened from my hive directly into my room, used to come round to the honey through an open window. One day (April 14, 1872), when a number of them were very busy on some berberries, I put a saucer with some honey between two bunches of flowers ; these flowers were repeatedly visited, and were so close that there was hardly room for the saucer between them, yet from 9.30 to 3.30 not a single bee took any notice of the honey. At 3.30 I put some honey on one of the bunches of flowers, and it was eagerly sucked by the bees ; two kept continually returning till past five in the evening. One day when I came home in the afternoon I found that at least a hundred bees had got into my room through the postern and were on the window, yet not 280 BEES FOLLOW ONE ANOTHER one was attracted by an open jar of honey which stood in a shady corner about 3 feet 6 inches from the window. Another day (April 29, 1872) I placed a saucer of honey close to some forget-me-nots, on which bees were numerous and busy; yet from 10 a.o. till 6 only one bee went to the honey. I put some honey in a hollow in the garden wall opposite my hives at 10.30 (this wall is about five feet high and four feet from the hives), yet the bees did not find it during the whole day. Qn March 30, 1873, a fine sunshiny day, when the bees were very active, I placed a glass containing honey at 9 in the morning on the wall in front of the hives; but not a single bee went to the honey the whole day. On April 20 I tried the same experiment with the same result. September 19.—At 9.30 I placed some honey in a glass about four feet from and just in front of the hive, but during the whole day not a bee observed it. As it then occurred to me that it might be suggested that there was something about this honey which rendered it unattractive to the bees, on the following day I first placed it again on the top of the wall for three hours, during which not a single bee came, and then moved it close to the alighting- board of the hive. It remained unnoticed for a quarter of an hour, when two bees observed it, and others soon followed in considerable numbers, TO STORES OF FOOD. 281 It is generally stated not only that the bees in a hive all know one another, but also that they immedi- ately recognise and attaek any intruder from another hive. It is possible that the bees of particular hives have a particular smell. Thus Langstroth, in his in- teresting ‘ Treatise on the Honey-Bee,’ says, ‘ Members of different colonies appear to recognise their hive companions by the sense of smell ;’ and I believe that if colonies are sprinkled with scented syrup they may generally be safely mixed. Moreover, a bee returning to its own hive with a load of treasure is a very dif- ferent creature from a hungry marauder; and it is said that a bee, if laden with honey, is allowed to enter any hive with impunity. Dr. Langstroth continues : ‘There is an air of roguery about a thieving bee which, to the expert, is as characteristic as are the motions of a pickpocket to a skilful policeman. Its sneaking look and nervous, guilty agitation, once seen, can never be mistaken. It is at any rate natural that a bee which enters a wrong hive by accident should be much sur- prised and alarmed, and would thus probably betray herself. So far as my own observations go, though bees habitually know and return to their own hive, still, if placed on the alighting-board of another, they often enter it without molestation. Thus :— On May 4 I put a strange bee into a hive at 2 o'clock. She remained in till 2.20, when she came out, but entered again directly. I was away most of the 282 BEHAVIOUR OF BEES afternoon, but returned at 5.30; at 6 she came out of the hive, but soon returned; and after that I saw no more of her. May 12.—A beautiful day, and the bees very active. I placed twelve marked bees on the alighting-board of a neighbouring hive. They all went in; but before evening ten had returned home. May 13.—Again put twelve marked bees on the alighting-board of another nest; eleven went in. The following day I found that seven had returned home ; the other five I could not see. May 17.—Took a bee, and, after feeding her and marking her white, put her to a hive next but one to her own at 4.18. She went in. 4,22. Came out and went in again. 4.29. Came out. I fed her and sent her back. 4.35. Came out. Took a little flight and came back. 4.45. Went in, but returned. 4.52. Went in. 4.53. Came out. 4.56. 3 4.57. 3 4.58. 55 5. 1. Came out, took another little flight, and returned. I fed her again. 5.25. Went in again. 5.28. Came out again. 5.29. eS 5.31. é 5.33. - 5.36. - 5.40. , 5.46. Shut her and the others in with a piece of note- paper. 6.36. One of the bees forced her way through. I opened the door; and several, including the IN A STRANGE HIVE. 283 white one, came out directly. Till 6.50 this bee kept on going in and out every minute or two; hardly any bees were flying, only a few stand- ing at the doors of most of the hives. At 7.20 she was still at the hive door. May 20.—Between 6 and 7 p.m. I marked a bee and transferred her to another hive. May 21.—Watched from 7.30 to 8.9 in the morning without seeing her. At half-past six in the evening went down again, directly saw and fed her. She was then in her new hive; but a few minutes after I ob- served her on the lighting-stage of her old hive; so I again fed her, and when she left my hand she returned to the new hive. May 22.—8 o’clock. She was back in her old hive. May 23.—About 12.30 she was again in the new hive. Though bees which have stung and lost their sting always perish, they do not die immediately ; and in the meantime they show little sign of suffering from the terrible injury. On August 25 a bee which had come several times to my honey was startled, flew to one of the windows, and had evidently lost her way. While I was putting her back she stung me, and lost her sting in doing so. I put her in through the postern, and for twenty minutes she remained on the landing- stage ; she then went into the hive, and after an hour returned tothe honey and fed quietly, notwithstanding 284 LABOUR OF BEES NOT INCESSANT. the terrible injury she had received. After this, how- ever, I did not see her any more. Like many other insects, bees are much affected by light. One evening, having to go down to the cellar, I lit a small covered lamp. A bee which was out came to it, and, flying round and round like a moth, followed me the whole of the way there. I often found that if bees which were brought to honey did not return at once, still they would do so a day or twoafterwards. For instance, on July 11, 1874, a hot thundery day, and when the bees were much out of humour, I brought twelve bees tosome honey: only one came back, and that one only once; but on the following day several of them returned. My bees sometimes ceased work at times when I could not account for their doing so. October 19 was a beautiful, sunshiny, warm day. All the morning the bees were fully active. At 11.25 I brought one to the honeycomb, and she returned at the usual intervals for a couple of hours; but after that she came no more, nor were there any other bees at work. Yet the weather was lovely, and the hive is so placed as to catch the afternoon sun. I have made a few observations to ascertain, if possible, whether the bees generally go to the same part of the hive. Thus,— October 5.—I took a bee out of the hive, fed her, and marked her. She went back to the same part. October 9.—At 7.15 I took out two bees, fed and RECKLESSNESS OF BEES. 285 marked them. They returned; but I could not see them in the same part of the hive. One, however, I found not far off. At 9.30 brought out four bees, fed and marked them. One returned to the same part of the hive. I lost sight of the others. Since their extreme eagerness for honey may be attributed rather to their anxiety for the commonweal than to their desire for personal gratification, it cannot fairly be imputed as greediness; still the following scene, described by Dr. Langstroth, and one which most of us have witnessed, is incompatible surely with much intelligence. ‘No one can understand the extent of their infatuation until he has seen a con- fectioner’s shop assailed by myriads of hungry bees. I have seen thousands strained out from the syrup in which they had perished ; thousands more alighting even upon the boiling sweets; the floor covered and windows darkened with bees, some crawling, others flying, and others still so completely besmeared as to be able neither to crawl nor fly—not one in ten able to carry home its ill-gotten spoils, and yet the air filled with new hosts of thoughtless comers.’! If, however, bees are to be credited with any moral feelings at all, I fear the experience of all bee-keepers shows that they have no conscientious scruples about robbing their weaker brethren. ‘If the bees of a strong stock,’ says Langstroth, ‘once get a taste of forbidden 1 Hive- and Honey-Bee, Langstroth, p. 277, 286 WANT OF AFFECTION. sweets, they will seldom stop until they have tested the strength of every hive.’ And again, ‘Some bee- keepers question whether a bee that once learns to steal ever returns to honest courses.’ Siebold has mene tioned similar facts in the case of certain wasps-( Polistes). Far, indeed, from having been able to discover any evidence of affection among them, they appear to be thoroughly callous and utterly indifferent to one another. As already mentioned, it was necessary for me occasionally to kill a bee; but I never found that the others took the slightest notice. Thus on October 11 I crushed a bee close to one which was feeding-—in fact, so close that their wings touched; yet the sur- vivor took no notice whatever of the death of her sister, but went on feeding with every appearance of composure and enjoyment, just as if nothing had hap pened. When the pressure was removed, she remained by the side of the corpse without the slightest appear- ance of apprehension, sorrow, or recognition. She evi- dently did not feel the slightest emotion at her sister’s death, nor did she show any alarm lest the same fate should befall her also. In a second case exactly the same occurred. Again, I have several times, while a bee has been feeding, held a second bee by the leg close to her; the prisoner, of course, struggled to escape, and buzzed as loudly as she could ; yet the bee which was feeding took no notice whatever. So far, therefore, from being at all affectionate, I doubt whether bees are in the least fond of one another. * DEVOTION TO QUEEN. 287 Their devotion to their queen is generally quoted as an admirable trait; yet it is of the most limited character. For instance, I was anxious to change one of my black queens for a Ligurian; and accord- ingly on October 26 Mr. Hunter was good enough to bring me a Ligurian queen. We removed the old queen, and we placed her with some workers in a box containing some comb. I was obliged to leave home on the following day ; but when I returned on the 30th I found that all the bees had deserted the poor queen, who seemed weak, helpless, and miserable. On the 31st the bees were coming to some honey at one of my windows, and I placed this poor queen close to them. In alighting, several of them even touched her ; yet not one of her subjects took the slightest notice of her. The same queen, when afterwards placed ‘in the hive, im- mediately attracted a number of bees. As regards the affection of bees for one another, it is no doubt true that when they have got any honey on them, they are always lickea clean by the rest; but I am satisfied that this is for the sake of the honey rather than of the bee. On September 27, for instance, I tried with two bees: one had been drowned, the other was smeared with honey. The latter was soon licked clean; of the former they took no notice whatever. I have, moreover, repeatedly placed dead bees by honey on which live ones were feeding, but the latter never took the slightest notice of the corpses. Dead bees are indeed usually carried out of the 288 SENSE OF SMELL. hive ; but if one is placed on the alighting-stage, the others seem to take no notice of it, though it is in general soon pushed off accidentally by their move- ments. I have even seen the bees sucking the juices of a dead pupa. As regards the senses of bees, it seems clear that they possess a keen power of smell. On October 5 I put a few drops of eau de Cologne in the entrance of one of my hives, and immediately a number of bees (about fifteen) came out to see what was the matter. Rose-water also had the same effect 3 and, as will be mentioned presently, in this manner I called the bees out several times; but after a few days they took hardly any notice of the scent. These observations were made partly with the view of ascertaining whether the same bees act as sentinels. With this object, on October 5 I called out the bees by placing some eau de Cologne in the entrance, and marked the first three bees that came out. At 5 P.M. I called them out again; about twenty came, including the three marked ones. J marked three more. October 6.— Called them out again. Out of the first twelve, five were marked ones. I marked three more. October 7.—Called them out at 7.30 a.M. as before. Out of the first nine, seven were marked ones, At 5.30 P.M. called them out again. Out of six, five were marked ones, October 8.—Called them out at 7.15. Six came out, all marked ones. SENTINELS, 289 October 9.—Called them out at 6.40. Out of the first ten, eight were marked ones. Called them out at 11.30 a.m. Out of six, three were marked. I marked the other three. Called them out at 1.30 p.m. Out of ten, six were marked. Called them out at 4.30. Out of ten, seven were marked. October 10.—Called them out at 6.5 a.m. Out of six, five were marked. Shortly afterwards I did the same again, when out of eleven, seven were marked ones. 5.30 P.M. Called them out again. Out of seven, five were marked. Octover 11.—6.30 a.M. Called them out again, Out of nine, seven were marked, 5 p.M. Called them out again. Out of seven, five were marked. After this day they took hardly any notice of the scents. Thus in these nine experiments, out of the ninety- seven bees which came out first, no less than seventy- one were marked ones, though out of the whole number of bees in the hive there were only twelve marked for this purpose, and, indeed, even fewer in the earlier ex- periments. I ought, perhaps, to add that I generally fed the bees when I called them out. 290 SENSE OF HEARING. The Sense of Hearing. The result of my experiments on the hearing of bees has surprised me very much. It is generally considered that to a certain extent the emotions of bees are expressed by the sounds they make,! which seems to imply that they possess the power of hearing. I do not by any means intend to deny that this is the case. Nevertheless I never found them take any notice of any noise which I made, even when it was close to them. I tried one of my bees with a violin. I made all the noise I could, but to my surprise she took no notice. I could not even see a twitch of the antenne. The next day I tried the same with another bee, but could not see the slightest sign that she was conscious of the noise. On August 31 I repeated the same experiment with another bee with the same result. On September 12 and 13 I tried several bees with a dog-whistle and a shrill pipe; but they took no notice whatever, nor did a set of tuning- forks which I tried on 4 subsequent day have any more effect. These tuning-forks extended over three octaves, beginning with a below the ledger line. I also tried with my voice, shouting, &c., close to the head of a bee; but, i2 spite of my utmost efforts, the bees took no notice. I repeated these experiments at night when the bees were quiet; but no noise that I could make seemed to disturb them in the least. ’ Bee, for instance, Landois, Zeits. f. wiss. Zool. 1867, p. 184. COLOUR SENSE. 291 In this respect the results of my observations on bees entirely agreed with those on ants, and I will here, therefore, only refer to what has been said in a preceding chapter (pp. 225-233). Details of some tecent experiments will be found in Appendix I. The Colour Sense of Bees. The consideration of the causes which have led to the structure and colouring of flowers is one of the most fascinating parts of natural history. Most botanists are now agreed that insects, and especially bees, have played a very important part in the development of flowers. While in many plants, almost invariably with inconspicuous blossoms, the pollen is carried from flower to flower by the wind, in the case of almost all large and brightly coloured flowers this is effected by the agency of insects. In such flowers the colours, scent, and honey serve to attract insects, while the size and form are arranged in such a manner that the insects fertilise them with pollen brought from another plant. There could, therefore, be little doubt that bees possess a sense of colour. Nevertheless I thought it would be desirable to prove this if possible by actual experiment, which had not yet been done. Accordingly on July 12 I brought a bee to some honey which I placed on blue paper, and about 3 feet off I placed a similar quantity of honey on orange paper After she had returned twice I transposed the papers; but she returned to the honey on the blue u2 292 EXPERIMENTS WITH paper. After she had made three more visits, always to the blue paper, I transposed them again, and she again followed the colour, though the honey was left in the same place. The following day I was not able to watch her; but on the 14th at— 7.29 a.M. she returned to the honey on the blue paper At 7.31 she left. 7.44 ” 99 9 1-4] ” 7.56 » ” I then again transposed the papers. At 8.5 she returned to the old place, and was just going to alight ; but observing the change of colours, without a moment’s hesitation darted off to the blue. No one who saw her at that moment could have entertained the slightest doubt about her perceiving the difference between the two colours. At 8.9 she went. 8.13 she returned to the blue; at 8.16 she left. 8.20 9 9 8.23 5, 8.26 3 9 8.30 s Transposed the colours again. At 8.35 she returned to the blue, and at 8.39 left. 8.44 29 + 8.47 spss 8.50 9 5 8.58 Transposed the colours again. 8.57 she returned again tothe blue; 9.0 ,, 9. 4 3 99 Oot ies 9.12 7) > 9.15 COLOURED PAPER. 293 9.19 she returned again to the blue; 9.22 left. 9,25 9 PD 9.27 5 9.30 Ps “5 9.34 ,, 9.40 * “2 9.44 ,, 9.50 os 4 9.55 4, Transposed the colours again. 10. 2 she returned again to the blue; 10. 6 10.10 5 10.14 ,, 10.20 . As 10.25 ,, 10.30 . n 10:45 44, 10.40 3 s 10.44 ,, 10.48 “ 5 10:51) ~ 55 11.12 + bl.i4> =; 11.2] % - and flew about, having been disturbed. 11.26 . $ 11.28 left. 11.36 . zs 1400 a 12. 5 came and flew about, but did not settle till— 12.17 she returned again to the blue; 12.17 went. 12.21 came and flew about. Though it was a beautiful afternoon, she did not return any more that day. On October 2 I placed some honey on slips of glass resting on black, white, yellow, orange, green, blue, and red paper. A bee which was placed on the orange returned twenty times to that slip of glass, only once or twice visiting the others, though I moved the posi- tion and also the honey. The next morning again two 294 EVIDENT POWER OF or three bees paid twenty-one visits to the orange and yellow, and only four to all the other slips of glass. I then moved the glass, after which, out of thirty-two visits, twenty-two were to the orange and yellow. This was due, I believe, to the bee having been placed on the orange at the beginning of the experiment. I do not attribute it to any preference for the orange or yellow; indeed, I shall presently give reasons for considering that blue is the favourite colour of bees. October 6.—I had ranged my colours in a line, with the blue at one end. It was a cold morning, and only one bee came. She had been several times the pre- ceding day, generally to the honey which was on the blue paper. This day also she came to the blue; I moved the blue gradually along the line one stage every half-hour, during which time she paid fifteen visits to the honey, in every case going to that which was on the blue paper. Again, on September 13 at 11 4.m., I brought up a bee from one of my hives; at 11.40 she returned to honey which I had put ona slip of glasson green paper. She returned at 11.51. And again At 12. 1 One »» 12.22 81233 »» 12.46 » 12.58 DISTINGUISHING COLOURS. 295 She returned at 1.12. This time she lost ber way in the room. 3 1.49 4 2. 1. This time she got stuck in the honey, and had to clean herself. = 2.25 > 2.40. I now put red paper instead of the green, and put the green paper with a similar quantity of honey on it a foot off. ” 2.51 to the honey on green paper. I then gently moved the green paper, with the bee on it, back to the old spot. When the bee had gone, I put vellow paper where the green had been, and put the green again a foot off. ss 3. Oto the honey on the yellow paper. I disturbed the bee, and she at once flew to the honey on the green paper; when she had gone, 1 put orange paper in the old place, and put the green paper about a foot off. 99 3.10 to the honey on the green paper. 296 EVIDENT POWER OF I again gently moved the paper, with the bee on it, to the usual place; and when the bee had gone, put white paper in the old place, and put the green a foot off. She returned at 3.20 tothe honey on the green paper. ” { again gently moved the green paper, with the bee on it, to the old place; and when she had gone, re- placed it by blue paper, putting the green a toot off. 3.30 to the honey on the green paper. I again repeated the same thing, putting yellow in- stead of blue. 3.40 to the green paper. I now re- versed the position of the yellow and green papers; but 3.51 to the green. After this 4. 6 4.15 4.28, when she left off for the day, uor were there any bees still working in the garden. The same afternoon a wasp, which I was observing, remainec at work till 6.29 P.M. DISTINGUISHING COLOURS. 297 August 20.—About noon I brought five bees to some honey at my window. They all soon returned, and numerous friends came with them. One of them I put to some honey on blue paper. She returned as follows, viz. :— At 12.36 At 2.30 », 12.42 ,. 2.38 Spl 2s53 Rae) », 1.28 ,» 3-10 pol. 38 Rey » 1.49 yy B50 » 22 eee es » 2.11 » 4.14 »» 2.24 y» 4.23 when I left off watching and shut her out. The longer intervals are due to her having got some honey every now and then on her wings and legs, when she lost a little time in cleaning herself. August 21.—I opened my window at 6 am No bee came till at 7.33 the one above-mentioned came to the honey on blue paper. I also placed some honey on orange paper about two feet off. At 7.42 she returned to the honey on blue paper, and again 7.55 she returned to the honey on blue paper. 8. 3 $9 99 8.14 bad 99 298 EVIDENT POWER OF At 8.25 She returned to the honey on blue paper. », 8.36 +5 9 33 8.44 2? ” 9 8.54 ” 9 93 9. 5 ”? ” I then transposed the papers, but not the honey. At 9.16 she came back to the honey on blue paper, I then transposed the papers again. At 9.29 she came back to the honey on blue paper. I then transposed them again, At 9.39 ” ” ” ” At 9.53 she came back to the honey on blue paper. I now put green paper instead of orange, and transposed the places. At 10.0 she came back to the honey on green paper. I transposed them again. At 10.8 she came back to the honey on blue pape. I transposed them again. At 10.21 she came back to the honey on green paper. I now put red paper instead of green, and transposed the places. At 10.30 she came back to the honey on blue paper. T transposed them again. At 10.42 ”»> ” ” ds ” 10.53 39 > ”° ” ” 1 1. 4 ”° ” 9 ” 99 1 1.16 39 3” 2? ” i now put white paper instead of red, and trans- posed the places. DISTINGUISHING COLOURS. 299 At 11.28 she came back to the honey on blue paper. [ transposed them again. At 11.41 ” ” y) ” 11.56 ” ry) ” yy) 12. 8 ry) ” ” ” At 12.17 she came back to the honey on blue paper. I now put green paper again instead of white, and transposed the places. At 12.27 she came back to the honey on blue paper. I transposed them again. At 12.40 5 ” ” ” 12.50 yy 3” +) >) 1. O 99 9 9 Ae) 1.13 5) ” ” ” At 1.25 she came back to the honey on blue paper, and then to the green. I transposed them again. At 1.40 she came back to the honey on blue paper. I transposed them again. At 1.47 she came back to the honey on green paper. y, 1.57 she came back to the honey on blue paper, and then to the green. At 2. 6 she came back to the honey on blue paper. ” 2.17 ? 9” ” ” The following day I accustomed this bee to green paper. She made 63 visits (beginning at 7.47 and ending at 6.44), of which 50 were to honey on green paper. The following day, August 23, she began work,— 000 EVIDENT POWER OF At. 7.12 returning to honey on green paper. I then put some on yellow paper about a foot off. At 7.19 she turned to the honey on green paper. I transposed the colours. At 7.25 she turned to the honey on green paper. I replaced the yellow paper by orange and transposed the places. At 7.36 she turned to the honey on green paper. I transposed the colours so that the orange might be on the spot to which the bee was most accustomed. At 7.44 she turned to the honey on green paper. [ now put white instead of orange. At 7.55 she turned to the honey on green paper. Transposed the papers. At 8.1 she turned to the honey on green paper. I now put blue paper instead of white. At 8.12 she turned to the honey on blue paper; but it will be remembered that she had been previously accustomed to come to the blue. I now put red instead of blue. At 8.23 she turned to the honey on green paper 29 8.25 ” ” ry) ry) ry) 8.47 ” ” > ” 1 then ceased observing and removed the honey. Thus the bee which was accustomed to green, returned to that colour when it was removed about a foot, and replaced by yellow, orange, white, and red ; but, on the other hand, when it was replaced by blue, she went to the blue. I kept this bee under obser- DISTINGUISHING CULOURS, 301 vation till the 28th, but not with reference to colours. August 24.—At 7.45 I put another bee to honey on green paper, to which she kept on returning till 9.44. The next day ‘August 25) she came at 7.38, and I let her come to the green paper till 9. The follow- ing morning she returued at 6 4.M., coming back as follows, viz. :— At 6.10 » 6.18 yy 6.25 3 6035 » 6.45 » 6.54 Ser ea: AS I now put orange in place of green, and put the green a foot off. At 7.24 she returned to the green. I replaced the paper with the bee on it; and when she had gone I put light blue in piace of the green, and again moved the green a foot off. At 7.36 she returned to the blue. I again replaced the paper with the bee on it; and when she had gone J] put yellow in place of the green, and again moved the green a foot off. At 7.44 she returned to the green I then did 302 M. BONNIER'’S VIEWS. exactly the same, only putting vermilion in place of the green. At 7.55 she returned to the green. I then did ex- actly the same, only putting white in place of green. At 8. 3 she returned to the green. These observations clearly show that bees possess the power of distinguishing colours. It remained to determine, if possible, whether they have any preference for one colour over another. M. Bonnier in a recent memoir! denies this. He does not question the power of insects to distinguish eolours, which he admits that the preceding observa- tions clearly prove, but he maintains that they would not be in any way attracted or guided by the colours of flowers, This he has attempted to demonstrate by experiment. With this view he proceeded as follows: —He took four cubes, 22 centim. by 12 (1.e. about 9 inches by 34), and coloured red, green, yellow, and white, placing them 6 feet apart in a line parallel to and about 60 feet distant from the hives. He then placed on each an equal quantity of honey, and from minute to minute counted the number of bees on each cube. He found that the number of bees on each was approx- imately equal, and that the honey was removed from each in about twenty minutes. In the experiment he records the bees began to arrive directly the honey was arranged, and in ten minutes there were nearly a hundred bees on each cube. I presume, therefore, that 1 Tes Nectaires. M. BONNIER'S EXPERIMENT, 303 the bees were previously accustomed to come to the spot in question, expecting to find honey. I do not think, however, that any conclusive result could be expected from this experiment. In the first place, after the first five minutes there were about thirty bees on each cube, and in less than ten minutes nearly a hundred, and the colour therefore must have been almost covered up. The presence of so many bees would also attract their companions. Moreover, as the honey was all removed in less than twenty minutes, the bees were evidently working against time. They were like the passengers in an express train, turned hurriedly into a refreshment-room ; and we cannot expect that they would be much influenced by the colouring of the tablecloth. In fact, the experiment was too hurried, and the test not delicate enough. Then, again, he omitted blue, which I hope to show is the bee’s favourite colour, and his cubes were all coloured. It is true that one was green; but any one may satisfy himself that a piece of green paper on grass is almost as conspicuous as any other colour. To make this experiment complete, M. Bonnier should have placed beside the honey on the coloured cubes a similar supply, without any accompaniment of colour to render it conspicuous. I could not, therefore, regard these experiments as at all conclusive. The following seem to me a more fair test :— - I took slips of glass of the size generally used for 304 EXPERIMENTS TO TEST slides for the microscope, viz. 3 inches by 1, and pasted them on slips of paper of the same size, coloured re- spectively blue, green, orange, red, white, and yellow. I then put them on a lawn, in a row, about a foot apart, and on each put a second slip of glass with a drop of honey. I also put with thema slip of plain glass with a similar drop of honey. I had previously trained a marked bee to come to the place for honey. My plan then was, when the bee returned and had sipped about for a quarter of aminute, to remove the honey, when she flew toanother slip. This then I took away, when she went to a third; and so on. In this way—as bees generally suck for three or four minutes—I induced her to visit all the drops successively before returning to the nest. When she had gone to the nest I transposed all the upper glasses with the honey, and also moved the coloured glasses. Thus, as the drop of honey was changed each time, and also the position of the coloured glasses, neither of these could influence the selection by the bee. In recording the results I marked down successively the order in which the bee went to the different coloured glasses. For iustance, in the first journey from the nest, as recorded below, the bee lit first on the blue, which accordingly I marked 1; when the blue was removed, she flew about a little amd then lit on the white ; when the white was removed, she settled on the green ; and so on successively on the orange, yellow, plain, and red. I repeated the experiment a hundred times, using two different hives—one in Kent and PREFERENCE FOR PARTICULAR COLOURS. 305 one in Middlesex—-and spreading the observations over some time, so as to experiment with different bees, and under varied circumstances. Adding the numbers together, it of course follows that the greater the preference shown for each colour the lower will be the number standing against it. The following table gives the first day’s observa- tions im extenso :— White Yellow i 1 3 6 4 Uf 2 5 2 5 4 7 6 1 2 3 3 1 4 7 6 5 3 2 4 2 4 6 a 5 1 3 5 1 4 7 2 6 5 3 6 1 2 3 6 5 4 7 7 2 i 4 7 3 5 6 8 3 4 6 2 7 5 1 9 5 1 7 4 6 3 2 1 6 7 5 3 2 4 4 6 5 2 if 3 1 26 65 51 55 35 37 In the next series of experiments the bees had been trained for three weeks to come to a particular spot cn a large lawn, by placing from time to time honey on a piece of plain glass. This naturally gave the plain glass an advantage; nevertheless, as will be seen, the blue still retained its pre-eminence. It seems hardly necessary to give the observations in detail. The following table shows the general result :— D. ¢ 506 EXPERIMENTS SHOWING Blue | Green |Orange; Plain lst 2nd, May 30 ... 3rd, July 2... Ath oersst) hee. Ray ae 1) coc 6th) 5,,. (6 =. TRAN | ay PIU Soe Sthys)5;) 2a).s: 9th, The precautions taken seem to me to have placed the colours on an equal footing ; while the number of experiments appears sufficient to give a fair average. It will be observed also that the different series agree well among themselves. The difference between the numbers is certainly striking. Adding together 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7, we get 28 as the total number given by each journey; 100 journeys therefore give, as the table shows, a total of 2,800, which divided by 7 would of course, if no preference were shown, give 400 for each colour. The numbers given, however, are—for the blue only 275, for the white 349, yellow 405, red 413, green 427, orange 440, and plain glass as many as 491 Another mode of testing the result is to take the per-centage in which the bees went respectively to each colour first, second, third, and so on. It will be observed, for instance, that out of a hundred rounds the bees took blue as one of the first three in 74 cases, PREFERENCE FOR BLUE. 307 and one of the last four only in 26 cases; while, on the contrary, they selected the plain as one of the first three only in 25 cases, and one of the last four in 75 cases. | Blue | Green | Orange} Plain First atic 31 10 Second ... 18 11 Third Bes 25 12 Fourth ... 8 23 Fifth ie 11 13 Sixth ee 3 15 Seventh ... 4 16 | 100 | 100 |} 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 . I may add that I was by no means prepared for this result. I may very likely be asked, if blue is the favourite colour of bees, and if bees have had so much to do with the origin of flowers, how is it that there are so few blue ones? I believe the explanation to be that all blue flowers have descended from ancestors in which the flowers were green; or, to speak more precisely, in which the leaves immediately surround- ing the stamens and pistil were green; and that they have passed through stages of white or yellow, and gene- rally red, before becoming blue. That all flowers were originally green and inconspicuous, as those of so many plants are still, has, I think, been shown by recent researches, especially those of Darwin, Miiller, and Hildebrand. But what are the considerations which seem to x2 308 LATE ORIGIN OF BLUE FLOWERS justify us in concluding that blue flowers were formerly yellow or white? Let us consider some of the orders in which blue flowers occur with others of different colours. For instance, in the Ranunculaces,! those with simple open flowers, such as the buttercups and Thalic- trums are generally yellow or white. The blue delphiniums and aconites are highly specialised, abnormal forms, and doubtless, therefore of more recent origin. Among the Caryophyllacex the red and purplish species are amongst those with highly specialised flowers, such as Dianthus and Saponaria, while the simple open flowers, which more nearly represent the ancestral type, such as Stelluria, Cerastuum, &e., are yellow and white. Take again the Primulacee. The open-flowered, honeyless species, such as Lysimachia and Trientalis, are generally white or yellow; while red, purple, and blue occur principally in the highly specialised species with tubular flowers. The genus Anagallis here, how- ever, certainly forms an exception. Among the violets we find some yellow, some blue species, and Miller considers that the yellow is the original colour. Viola biflora, a small, comparatively little specialised fly-flower, is yellow; while the large, long-spurred V. calcarata, specially adapted to humble- bees, is blue. In V. tricolor, again, the smaller 1 ITtake most of the following facts from Miiller’s admirable work on Alpine Flowers. LATE ORIGIN OF BLUE FLOWERS. 309 varieties are whitish-yellow; the larger and more highly developed, blue. Myosotis versicolor we know is first yellow and then blue; and, according to Miller, one variety of V. tricolor alpestris is yellow when it first opens, and gradually becomes more and more blue. In this case the individual flower repeats the phases which in past times the ancestors have passed through. The flowers of one species of Lantana last three days, and, as Fritz Muller first pointed out, are on the first day yellow, on the second day orange, and on the third day purple. The only other family I will mention is that of the Gentians. Here, also, while the well-known deep blue species have long tubular flowers, specially adapted tc bees and butterflies, the yellow Gentiana lutea has a simple open flower with exposed honey. Miller and Hildebrand ' havealso pointed out that the blue flowers, which, according to this view, are descended from white or yellow ancestors, passing in many cases through a red stage, frequently vary, as if the colours had not had time to fix themselves, and by atavism assume their original colour. Thus Aquilegia vulgaris, Ajuga Genevensis, Polygala vulgaris, P. comosa, Salvia pra- tensis, Myosotis alpestris, and many other blue flowers, are often reddish or white; Viola calcarata is normally blue, but occasionally yellow. On the other hand, flowers which are normally white or yellow, rarely, I might almost say never, vary to blue. Moreover, though it is 1 Die Farben dev Bliithen, p. 26. $10 LATE ORIGIN OF BLUE FLOWERS. true that there are comparatively few blue flowers, still, if we consider only those in which the honey is con- cealed, and which are, as we know, specially suited to and frequented by bees and butterflies, we find a larger proportion. Thus, of 150 flowers with concealed boney observed by Miiller in the Swiss Alps,' 68 were white or yellow, 52 more or less red, and 30 blue or violet. However this may be, it seems to me that the preceding experiments show conclusively that bees do prefer one colour to another, and that blue is distinctly their favourite. 1 Alpenblumen, yp. 492. 311 CHAPTER XI. WASPS. { HAVE also made a few experiments with wasps. So far as their behaviour, when they have discovered a store of food, is concerned, what has been said with reference to bees would apply in the main to wasps also. I will give some of the details in the Appendix, and here only refer very briefly to some of the experiments. Experiment 1.—Watched a wasp, which I had accus- tomed to come to my room for honey, from 9.36 a.m. to 6.25 p.m. She made forty-five visits to the honey, but did not bring a single comrade. Experiment 2.—The following day this wasp began working—at least, came to my room for the first time at 6.55 a.M., and went on passing backwards and forwards most industriously till 6.17 p.m. She made thirty-eight journeys, and did not bring a single friend. Experiment 3.—Another wasp was watched from 6.16 a.M. till 6 P.M. She made fifty-one journeys, and during the day five other wasps came to the honey. I do not think she brought them. Experiment 4.—Another wasp was watched from 10 a.M. to 5.15 P.M.; she made twenty-eight journeys, 312 POWER OF COMMUNICATION. and brought no friend. This wasp returned the next morning at 6 A.M. . Experiment 5.—A wasp was watched from 11.56 AM. to 5.36 P.M. She made twenty-three journeys, without bringing a friend Experiment 6.—Another wasp between 6.40 A.M. and 5.55 P.M. made sixty journeys, without bringing a friend. Experiment 7.—Another wasp between 7.25 a.M. and 6.43 P.M. made no less than ninety-four visits to the honey, but did not bring a single friend. Experiment 8.—I watched a wasp on September 19. She passed regularly backwards and forwards between the nest and the honey, but during the whole day only one other wasp came of herself to the honey; this wasp returned on the 20th, but not one other. The 21st was a hot day, and there were many wasps about the house; my honey was regularly visited by the two marked wasps, but during the whole day only five others came to it. September 22.—Again only one strange wasp came, up to one o’clock. September 27.—Only one strange wasp came October 2 and 3.—These days were cold; a few marked bees and wasps came to my honey, but no strangers. October 4.—Two strangers. October 6.—Only one stranger. On these days the honey was watched almost with- POWER OF HEARING. 313 out intermission the whole day, and was more or less regularly visited by the marked bees and wasps. My experiments, then, in opposition to the state- ments of Huber and Dujardin, serve to show that wasps and bees do not in all cases convey to one another in- formation as to food which they may have discovered, though I do not doubt that they often do so. Of course, when one wasp has discovered and is visiting a supply of syrup, others are apt to come too; but I believe that in many instances they merely follow one another. If they communicated the fact, considerable numbers would at once make their appearance ; but I have not often found this to be the case. The frequent and regular visits which my wasps paid to the honey put out for them, prove that it was very much to their taste; yet few others made their appearance. These and other observations of the same tendency seem to show that, even if wasps have the power of in- forming one another when they discover a store of good food, at any rate they do not habitually do so. On the whole, wasps seem to me more clever in finding their way than bees. I tried wasps with the glass mentioned on p. 278, but they had no difficulty in finding their way out. My wasps, though courageous, were always on the alert, and easily startled. It was, for instance, more difficult to paint them than the bees; nevertheless, though I tried them with a set of tuning-forks covering 314 COURAGE OF WASPS. three octaves, with a shrill whistle, a pipe, a violin, and my own voice, making in each case the loudest and shrillest sounds in my power, I could see no symptoms in any case that they were conscious of the noise. The following fact struck me as rather remarkable. One of my wasps smeared her wings with syrup, so that she could not fly. When this happened to a bee, it was only necessary to carry her to the alighting-board, when she was soon cleaned by her comrades. But I did not know where this wasp’s nest was, and therefore could not pursue a similar course with her. At first, then, I was afraid that she was doomed. I thought, however, that I would wash her, fully expecting, indeed, to terrify her so much that she would not return again. I there- fore caught her, put her in a bottle half full of water, and shook her up well till the honey was washed off. I then transferred her to another bottle, and put her in the sun to dry. When she appeared to have recovered I let her out: she at once flew to her nest, and I never expected to see her again. To my surprise, in thirteen minutes the brave little insect returned as if nothing had happened, and continued her visits to the honey all the afternoon. This experiment interested me so much that I re- peated it with another marked wasp, this time, how- ever, keeping the wasp in the water till she was quite motioniess and insensible. When taken out of the water she soon recovered; I fed her; she went quietly away to her nest as usual, and returned after the usnal TAME WASP. 315 absence. The next morning this wasp was the first to visit the honey. I was not able to watch any of the above-mentioned wasps for more than a few days, but I kept a specimen of Polistes gallica for no less than nine months. I took her, with her nest, in the Pyrenees, early in May. The nest consisted of about twenty cells, the majority of which contained an egg; but as yet no grubs had been hatched out, and, of course, my wasp was as yet alone in the world. I had no difficulty in inducing her to feed on my hand; but at first she was shy and nervous. She kept her sting in constant readiness; and once or twice in the train, when the railway officials came for tickets, and I was compelled to hurry her back into her bottle, she stung me slightly—I think, however, entirely from fright Gradually she became quite used to me, and when I took her on my hand apparently expected to be fed. She even allowed me to stroke her without any appear- ance of fear, and for some months I never saw her sting. When the cold weather came on she fell into a drowsy state, and I began to hope she would hibernate and survive the winter. I kept her ina dark place, but watched her carefully, and fed her if ever she seemed at all restless. She came out occasionally, and seemed as well as usual till near the end of February, when one day I 316 POWER OF DISTINGUISHING COLOURS. observed she had nearly lost the use of her antenne, though the rest of the body was as usual. She would take no food. Next day I tried again to feed her ; but the head seemed dead, though she could still move her legs, wings, and abdomen. The following day I offered her food for the last time ; but both head and thorax were dead or paralysed; she could but move her tail, a last token, as I could almost fancy, of gratitude and affection. As far as I could judge, her death was quite painless; and she now occupies a place in the British Museum. Power of distinguishing Colours. As regards colours, I satisfied myself that wasps are capable of distinguishing colour, though they do not seem so much guided by it as bees are. July 25.—At 7 a.M. I marked a common worker wasp (Vespa vulgaris), and placed her to some honey on a piece of green paper 7 inches hy 43. She worked with great industry. Aftershe had got well used to the green paper I moved it 18 inches off, putting some other honey on blue paper where the green had pre- viously been. She returned tothe blue. I then replaced the green paper for an hour, during which she visited it several times, after which I moved it 18 inches, as before, and put brick-red paper in its place. She returned to the brick-red paper. But although this experiment indicates that this wasp was less strongly affected by EXPERIMENTS WITH COLOURED PAPERS, 317 colours than the bees which I had previously observed, still I satisfied myself that she was not colour-blind. I moved the green paper slightly and put the honey, which, as before, was on a slip of plain glass, about four feet off. She came back and lit on the green paper, but finding no honey, rose again, and hawked about in search of it. After 90 seconds I put the green paper under the honey, and in 15 seconds she found it. I then, while she was absent at the nest, moved both the honey and the paper about a foot from their previous positions, and placed them about a foot apart. She returned as usual, hovered over the paper, lit on it, rose again, flew about for a few seconas, lit again on the paper, and again rose. After 2 minutes had elapsed I slipped the paper under the honey, when she almost immediately (within 5 seconds) lit on it. It seems obvious, therefore, that she could see green. I then tried her with red. I placed the honey on brick-red paper, and left her for an hour, from 5 P.M. to 6, to get accustomed to it. During this time she con- tinued her usual visits. I then put the honey and the coloured paper about a foot apart; she returned first to the paper and then to the honey. I then transposed the honey and the paper. This seemed to puzzle her, She returned to the paper, but did not settle. After she had hawked about for 100 seconds I put the honey on the red paper, when she settled on it at once. I then put the paper and the honey again 18 inches apart. As before, she returned first to the paper, but 318 EXPERIMENTS WITH COLOURED PAPERS. almost immediately went to the honey. In a similar manner I satisfied myself that she could see yellow. Again, on August 18 I experimented on two wasps, one of which had been coming more or less regu- larly to some honey on yellow paper for four days, the other for twelve—coming, that is to say, for several days, the whole day long, and on all the others, with two or three exceptions, for at least three hours in the day. Both, therefore, had got well used to the yellow paper. I then put blue paper where the yellow had been, and put the yellow paper with some honey on it about a foot off. Both the wasps returned to the honey on the blue paper. I then moved both the papers about a foot, but so that the blue was somewhat nearer the original position. Both again returned to the blue. I then transposed the colours, and they both returned to the yellow. Very similar results were given by the wasp watched on September 11. After she had made twenty visits to honey on blue paper, I put it on yellow paper, and moved the blue 12 inches off. She came back to the yellow. I then put vermilion instead of yellow; she came back to the vermilion. I transposed the colours ; she came back to the vermilion. I put white instead of vermilion; she came to the blue. » green a white ; she came to the blue. » orange ,, green ; she came to the blue. I transposed the colours ; she returned to the orange. EXPERIMENTS WITH COLOURED PAPERS, 319 I put white instead of orange ; she came to the white. » green € white ; she came to the blue. 99 purple 5 green; she came to the purple. »9 orange - purple; she came to the orange. » green 3 orange; she came to tbe green. I transposed the colours; she came to the blue. ” 9 ” » green. So far, therefore, she certainly showed no special predilection for the blue. I then left her the rest of the day to visit the honey on blue paper exclusively. She made fifty-eight visits to it. The following morning I opened my window at 6.15, when she im- mediately made her appearance. I let her make ten more visits to the honey on blue paper, moving it about a foot or so backwards and forwards on the table. I then put orange paper instead of the blue, and put the blue about a foot off. She returned to the orange. I put yellow instead of orange; she came to the yellow. »» Vermilion ,, yellow; she came to the vermilion. » white » vermilion ; she came to the white. » green » White; she came to the green. [ transposed the colours; she came to the blue. 320 EXPERIMENTS WITH COLOURED PAPERS. I now put vermilion instead of green, and moved both of them a foot, but so that the vermilion was nearest the window, though touching the blue; she came to the vermilion. Again, September 11, I marked a wasp. She re- turned to the honey over and over again with the usual assiduity. The following morning I put the honey on green paper; she came backwards and forwards all day. On the 13th I opened my window at 6.8, and she came in immediately. During an hour she made ten journeys. On her leaving the honey for the eleventh time, I placed some honey on vermilion paper where the green had been, and put the honey and the green paper about a foot off. She came at 7.25 to the vermilion. I then put orange instead of vermilion. ss 7.34 ,, orange. I then put blue instead of orange. Ps 7.40 , blue. I then put white in- stead of blue. 9 7.47 ,, white. Ithen put yellow in- stead of white. a9 7.55, yellow and then to the green. . I transposed the colours. - 8.2 ,, green. I then moved both colours about a foot, but se that the yellow was a little nearer to the old place. She returned at 8.¥ to the veilow. PERCEPTION OF COLOUR. 321 I then removed the yellow paper and honey, and placed the honey which had been on the green paper about a foot from it on the table. At 8.15 she returned and lit on the green paper, but immediately flew off to the honey. I then trans- posed the honey and the paper. At 8.24 she returned and again lit on the paper, but immediately flew off to the honey. Thus, therefore, though it is clear that wasps can distinguish colours, they appear, as might be expected from other considerations, to be less guided by them than is the case with bees. I have been much struck by the industry of wasps. They commence work early in the morning, and do not leave off till dusk. I have several times watched a wasp the whole day, and from morning to evening, if not disturbed, they worked without any interval for rest or refreshment. Being anxious to compare bees and wasps in this respect, on August 6, 1882, I accustomed a wasp and three bees to come to some honey put out for them on two tables, one allotted to the wasp, the other to the bees. The last bee came at 7.15 p.m. ‘The wasp con- tinued working regularly till 7.47, coming at intervals of between six and seven minutes. Next morning, when I went into my study a few minutes after 4 a.M., I found the wasp already at the honey. The first bee came at 5.45, the second at 6. The wasp occupied about a minute, or even less, in Y. 322 CONCLUSION. supplying herself with a load of honey, and made during the day, as shown in the Appendix (p. 423), no less than 116 visits to the honey, or 232 journeys between my room and her nest, during which she carried off rather more than sixty-four grains of honey. It would, however, perhaps be unfair to the bees to regard this as indicating that they are less industrious than wasps. The deficiency may be due to their being more susceptible to cold. I may add that I then left home for a few days. I covered over the honey, leaving only a small entrance for the wasp. When I returned on the 12th, I found her still at work, and by herself. It was evident that she had continued her labours, but without bringing any friends to assist her. Every one has heard of a ‘bee-line.’ It would be no less correct to talk of a wasp-line. On August 6 I marked a wasp, the nest of which was round the corner of the house, so that her direct way home was not out of the window by which she entered, but in the opposite direction, across the room to a window which was closed. I watched her for some hours, during which time she constantly went to the closed window, and lost much time in buzzing about at it. August 7, I was not able to watch her. August 8 and 9, I watched her from 6.25 a.M., when she made ber first visit. She still constantly went to the closed window. August 10 and 11, I was away from home. August 12, she made her first visit at 7.40, and still CONCLUSION. 323 went to the closed window. August 13, her first. visit was at 6.15; she went to the closed window and remained buzzing about there till 7, when I caught her and put her out at the open one by which she always entered. August 15 and 16, she continued to visit the honey, put still, always, even after ten days’ experience, con- tinued to go to the closed window, which was in the direct line home; though on finding it closed she returned and went round through the open window by which she entered. 324 DIVISION OF LABOUR. § co a Te > S mM s [-9) aS 7, fe a bd Shae tS mst Ss -¢ & = a = S s a = nm a g aia 8 = ~~ ‘Ss R 8 | NN . 3 ee S 3 S ° “S i _— 8 1 SS a a (2) @ iio d Es Q DIVISION OF LABOUR. 325 or) oS oocoooooo wm Cyccooos oosce om oD Ne} Op zrccecsooss coooooesoo oFooS ate xe 2 OOS io to0000 SOSS9999090 0 ioZ°0 on SoSoooSO OO SSCO, 99909 ISS9999 9 IO iO on 6 ~O SOSSoSSOOCOSOSC OOOO TE OCS HOSCOO SO 20: Zz Z A 2 OO OD . . . ° . Sipe Oc icSeosoosoos iooSo 39 3 © 1900 ~ ° : Co, oS9C90 IoSSoSOS CSS SOSOSSSS SO I900 on Br) f co Coy cooocoooyoosooSo So SoSooS SO ico, : co on £ : fooo COL CoO CooS isooooooSD O90° : TO00OSO tOCOSDOSOSO tooo oOSooOSO COSCO : of I IID OO OOS) Oy ooooo Es) ie) ACO CO I ONO OO OF SO te a ee ac) A . 19 ~O © o:eoocooceococoeo,csceoocooe ti Ow? ooooo Z o ~) eccoococecec\|ceocoo : :9o090° ee 326 TaBLE I, (continued). DIVISION OF LABOUR. 16 = |Zoe SS0SO0 coOoSoCCoSCOOoOSCSCSOSCS Co =) a | coo cece SEEN NEN ENS SHENS oo 6 @ | Zeocece eoocooceccoecooso oo S:SSO0O0 SSOSCSCS HO sO JOC OO © eoooocse i ee oo ~O00000000%0 of a] A © eoooooo a oo ir He) eo zi ° A bd | coo ecco i) 3 <<) ey a ooooo ie) za ow Mad : ° imegooe COSSOSSCO, scoSsccS co 3 ; eooocoeco oceooooocoocoesosoo So SS0 sooo CSoS SS = . = e Ge) FR [ooo 00 fo SoFoce tooooFe oo © S Boo oocoo coococecoeocsesoso Coo Z, : 10 9 3 cn oo ooo Corooce Z, Zz, é Fo) pas al aa oo eae Liles Se One eee “Wear ae con Poco Aes = ee @ e 7 7 EZ Z, DIVISION OF LABOUR. 327 _— o ecocoooeocooeocece|ce\|ce\|cecoe 9esoo eo foo) oc oo,aosccococooococcoecoocn,sooo ooo Zz AZ aS io) cov oo tf Pc coco coo COZ Coo” ooo A ZG A GZ ror} r=) 5 3 roe) (—] er OO SF SS ooo “4 =) —) Se oS IS SOS 2 2 ooo to y q eo ecooooosoocsooooes gooece ooo ° oO . o oo i, s-ocooooocoeoocooce|cecec“eso ‘OC ecoocoooocoeooosososcoSocSosooscoosSosos eo secooocooocoocooocooceoce|ce|c/e|cecece © cococoocooooosoSoSSoSoSo :tosoooscsco = 2 (oe) ° eooooosooooSooT oes 1990909000, a for) . Fooo ooo o ooo oo ooSoS i999900 v © eocoscocoocoooocoocoocooooecece|c“eso 1 es : ©@ ccoo,ccoscocscoscscooscsoocsecece : 0 0 7 . © ©00 tooo SoOoOSSoOSSS :O 325 Taste I]I.—Slaves of Polyergus. (See p. 45.) DIVISION OF LABOUR. = age coococo ° a ° rite ooo* toto (=) (=) Dia Z . e @ = ° o off occce C=) Z AZ : © 5 ococoo cof ft ocooo co e Z Z ZA Z wo a) © oo Ww iOOCS SOSSSSSS 17,9000 25 cocoon SS ccc ccoccce] aT Zi ray Aras Zi ~ ein Santo a eNONS oo Tico. ooo® ooo FA A Ao Z A ZA A © fl o.to- Sooo. ToScoooooSs oO e e e Za a Ora Zz 16 Ve) . ° e alo: ooone zOCSSSoos 199 3S} oo so sO 8 ccc occooOofCce zi Z Ze ei Zi Ss en OO OL OSS, BOSCO OS ‘iy ZA & 2a ZLZZz A : 16 oO . . oo pooooooscoo, to99o9C90 fO ooococeococeocoooo ooo SA 2 | co ooope zococscoescosooosooos DIVISION OF LABOUR. © oooooooce o ooooocooooo 16 Z A eee = cooooccoo dg ecooscoocoocoSescS 4 ° ° 16 © 6 GO 0 tcoooSo i OS On 7 OCOSSSS 7) ; OOo 1000008 co tooeooscoocoS A ccooeo coor coco c of oP ofoco A A PA PA te scoot occ coo Of 6 tot ccceo : . ° A Az Os 16 Bo © . DOCSIS SS SOOO OC OCS = Solo = ° tre) =) oocoeo I OS OCS e 1 e eoooceo S22 Sy IDI OSS s ocooe : ©0000, C000, PoP ococe Z AA A N65 19,10 : coooo Aca © ocooooosoooyo$o ooo N5 : 6 v~) -) eoooocecscoooos See ed ope ee © © ad ooooo,cooo,csoscooo,cscooossos z A az Sooo CC OC OFC C OPM oot coool Z Az a ZA C © 1020 oOo 0 r=) eoooco -oc°o f) ooo i=) oococo e A Aa AG A Pam) ecoooocoooceocoe0coocooocosoo Sa SIS © ° 6 o>) So Sy OS 8B Os ocooooooco:s: oococo z Az NMMOOSCHmMODORHOAIENMAWOOY-ARDOAaAM tH SS SSS NUNNNNNANNNNANN d Ler) 329 330 DIVISION OF LABOUR. o oosco oT Soot. oS ro) Ze Z Sa 3 Oo ° Bg000 1B SSO, So CO ) ae Zz o oecooo Oo eccocoece co ° oooo FP s000%?% co ° Z ZG e & for) o tcoo o,ocoo oo ° : A A A . for) oo 2 o tooo ooo°o oo ° . Z AG ; o =; - o icooo SY SoS soa CC Zz Z z co © ococo o ecocoeso oo ° & Ss ‘= w oS occo Oo eccooeoo of S § ; . —_ Teo =O K a | 6 oo0°0 So cocococo fo ° = EA Eq — = Lon a |. . e a Ss o o:00 > ©CcooooSo of = & 0 = o oc 3:60 eo cos cloco) oS 331 DIVISION OF LABOUR. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ISIN 0 "9 pus g ‘son yOuq ynd J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 | °" | 2% 0 0 0 0 |TTN| 0 OF 2° = 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 | 9% 0 0 O 'ITINITIN! O ITIN! O |! O 0 'ITN! O O |ZN! O ITEIN!] O (9% "2 ‘ON yovq ynd Mou J 0 OD} TON | |0 0 |TTN| 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 | 0 0 !ITN! $3 0 0 |OTN/@IN| O |ITN! 0 | -O 0 0 0 0 0 0 |TTN; O 0 | & pe sed) pueny TIN] 0O 0 |TITN| O 0 0 0 {TIN ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° & i) f=) So = vA i Z (—) fo) i) o fo) So i} i) So (—) = i. | 0 0 OF (Sf OF 2 Na 50 0 0 So i) So —) i) J] i) & $32 DIVISION OF LABOUR. = ~_ =~ S OSC onmOo=CO= COT OOSCoeCo OocS Zz a z Zz ° © a oo © zeCooooooT oor coooeoso o9cSo Az lS a =~ | OS -O COT ocoosoceoscocoso of yA Z ea — Sed © Tre ocoo, cooocT TF oooocce ooo ALA Aw 3 2 |coocoe foococccooccce ooo Aa © [ml = Se | eee SS BOSS OPIS OSIOSIS) SS SO a Z Z GB} 7 |o :00 sco CoC OCSoCOCSCOSCOOSOSoSO CSCS vo 3 S ea tl = = a | OSSOS OOS ROC CROCS OOO COSCO SC CIS a A © ~ = ~ Cc ~ I ORB IRN NINE NEV HOS) BOS | ee Ae Bl Sa boesoemonsatescocococoe ssoocscocse < 42 2G BH oN ll INI II IID DD SDI IIIS ES a = re S DIN) EB OOS SOS OSE N eo cal Cm! Lonel onl @o SOOCSC CIO BOSC ROC COO COOCmOOC oS Z a Zi Z 7 Do ROOD E SOO SS 3 RECOGNITION OF FRIENDS, 335 APPENDIX B. Tue following are the details referred to on p. 122:— On August 4, 1875, I separated one of my colonies of Formica fusca into two halves, and kept them entirely apart. On March 15 following I put in a stranger and one of the old companions from the other half of the nest at 7 A.M., and watched them longer than those previously experimented on. The stranger was very soon attacked ; the friend seemed quite at home. June 4, 1876.—8 A.M. Put into the nest a stranger and an old friend. The stranger was at once attacked, and dragged about by one of her antenne. 9 a.m. The stranger was being attacked; the friend, though not attacked, kept rather away from the other ants. 10.30 a.m. The stranger was attacked, not the friend. 12.30 P.M. ditto, 1 P.M. ditto, 1.30 p.m. ditto. 2 P.M. ditto, 2.30 P.M. ditto, 4 P.M. ditto, 4.30 p.m. ditto. 5 P.M. The stranger was dragged out of the nest. June 5.—Put ina stranger and a friend at 9.30. At 10 the stranger was being attacked, not the friend. 10 a.. ditto, 10.30 a.m. ditto. At 11 a.m. I put in another stranger and another old friend, when nearly the same thing was repeated. At 11.30 a.m. the stranger was being dragged about by her antenne; the friend was not attacked. 12 a.m. The stranger was by herself in a corner of the nest. The friend was almost cleaned from the paint by which she was marked. I then put in another friend. At 2 p.m the stranger was being dragged about by an antenna, 334 RECOGNITION OF FRIENDS the friend was being cleaned. 2.30 P.M. ditto, 3 ditto. At 3.30 P.M. the friend was almost clean: the stranger was being dragged about. 6 P.M. ditto. June 10.—Repeated the same observation at 10 A.M., but transposed the colours by which they were distin- guished, so that there might be no question whether perhaps the difference of treatment was due to the ditterence of colouring. At 11 a.M. the friend was un- molested, the stranger was being dragged about by an antenna. 11.30 a.m. the friend unmolested, the stranger being dragged about by one leg. 12 a.m. ditto. 12.30 P.M. the friend unmolested, the stranger being dragged about by an antenna. 1 P.M. ditto, 2 P.M. ditto, 3 P.M. ditto. July 3.—Put in a friend and a stranger at 11 A.M. At 11.30 a.m the stranger was being dragged about, the friend was being cleaned. 12 A.M. ditto. 12.30 a.M. both were now being attacked. 1 P.M. ditto. This seems to show that some at least of the ants have forgotten their old friends. Perhaps, however, these were young ants. July 16.—Put in two friends at 7.45 4.M. At 8 A.M. each was being dragged about by anantenna. 8.30 A.M. one was being dragged about by both antenna, the other by both antennzeand one leg. 10 4.m. both were still attacked, but it is curious that at the same time others were cleaning off the paint. 12.30 P.M. both still attacked. July 17.—Put ina friend at 8.15 a.m. At 8.30 4.M. they were cleaning her. At 9A.M.she was almost clean. 9.30 a.M. she seemed quite at home, and had only one spot of paint on her. 10.20 a.m. ditto. July 20.—Put ina friend and stranger at 9 A.M. At 9.30 a.M. the friend seemed all right ; the stranger was in a corner by herself. At 10 a.M. the friend was being cleaned ; the stranger had come out of her corner and was being fiercely attacked. At 11 A.M. the friend AFTER LONG SEPARATION. 335 seemed quite at home and was almost cleaned; the stranger was being dragged about, but wasalmost cleaned. At 12 a.M. the same thing was going on, and also at 12.30 p.m. At 1.30 P.M. the stranger was still being pulled about; but what struck me as remarkable, the friend also had hold of one of the ants by an antenna. At 2 p.M. the friend was by herself, the stranger was being attacked. At 4 p.m. the friend again had hold of an ant by an antenna; the stranger was being pulled about. At 5 p.m. the friend seemed quite at home in the nest, the stranger was dragged out of the nest. The following morning I was still able to dis- tinguish the friend ; she seemed quite at home. August 5.—Put in a stranger and a friend at 8 A.M. At 8.30 A.M. both were attacked. 9 a.m. ditto, 9.30 A.M. ditto, 10 a.M. ditto, 11 A.M. ditto, 12.30 a.m. ditto. August 6.—Repeated the experiment at 2 a.m. Both ants hid themselves in corners. At 3.30 a.m. the stranger was being attacked; the friend was ina corner by herself. At 4.30 a.m. both were attacked. 5.30 A.M. ditto. August 7.—-Put in a stranger and a friend at 8.30 AM. At 8.45 4.M. both were being attacked. 9.30 a.M. ditto, 10 a.m. ditto. August 8.—Put in a friend at 7 aM. At 8 A.M. she seemed quite at home with the others. At 9 a.m. they had almost cleaned her. At 9.30 a.M. she seemed quite at home with the others. At 10 a.m. ditto. August 12.—Put in a friend and a stranger at 7 P.M. Both were immediately attacked. 7.15 a.m. they were being dragged about. 7.45 a.M. ditto, 8 ditto, 8.15 A.M. ditto. August 13.—Put in a friend at 6.30 a.m. At 7.50 A.M. two attacked her. At 8 a.m. she was being attacked by one ant, but another was cleaning her. 8.15 A.M. ditto. 8.45 a.M. Two were attacking her, one dragging at her by an antenna. 9 a.M. ditto, 9.30 336 RECOGNITION OF FRIENDS A.M. ditto, 10 A.M. ditto, 10.30 A.M. ditto. Others had almost entirely cleaned off the paint. At 5 P.M. put a friend and a stranger into the other half of the nest. At 5.15 a.m. the friend seemed quite at home, and had been nearly cleaned; the stranger was being attacked. 5.30 a.M. ditto, 8.15 A.M. ditto. 7.15 a.m. Two of the ants were dragging the stranger out of the nest; the friend had been quite cleaned. August 14.—At 8.15 a.m. I put an ant from each half of the nest into the other. At 8.30 A.M. one was alone in the corner, the other was being attacked. At 9 a.M. both were being attacked. 9.30 a.m. ditto, 10.30 A.M. ditto; 11.30 4.M. ditto, both, however, being almost cleaned. August 19.—At 8 a.m. I put into each nest one from the other. The one was received amicably and cleaned, so that after a while I lost sight of her. It was clear that she was received in a friendly manner, because no fighting was going on. At 11 a.m. I put into the same nest another friend: at 11.30 a.m. she was all right, and, being cleaned at 12 a.m., I could no longer distinguish her. The ant put into the other nest was not so well received. At 9.30 a.M., 11.30 a.M., and 12.30 a.m. she was being dragged about, but she was also being cleaned, and after 12.30 a.m. I lost sight of her. As the paint had been entirely removed, but no ant was being attacked, I have no doubt she was at length recognised as a friend. August 21.—At 10.15 4.M. IT again put into each nest an ant from the other. One was at once cleaned, and I could not find her. I should, however, certainly have seen her if she had been attacked. The other was at first attacked by one of the ants; but this soon ceased, and they began to clean her. By 11.30 a.M. she was quite at her ease among the other AFTER LONG SEPARATION. 337 ants, and almost clean. After 12 a.M.I could not see her any more. At 1.40 p.m. [ again put into each nest an ant from the other, accompanied, however, in both cases by a stranger. The contrast was most marked, and no one who saw it could have doubted that the friends and strangers were respectively recognised as such, or that. they themselves were fully aware of their posi- tion. In the first nest the friend at once joined the other ants, who began to clean her. The stranger ran about in evident alarm, was pursued by the others, and took refuge in acorner. At 2 P.M. the friend was with the other ants, the stranger alone inacorner. At 2.25 P.M. the friend was almost cleaned, and after 2.30 P.M. we could no longer distinguish her: the stranger was still alone. At 3.40 p.m. she came out of her hiding-place and was attacked; after a while she escaped from the nest. At 5.30 P.M. she met one of the ants, and a battle at once began. I separated the combatants and put the stranger back near her own nest, which she at once entered, and where she was soon cleaned by her own friends. I will now describe the adventures of the other couple. The friend immediately joined the other ants ; the stranger was hunted about and soon seized. At 2 P.M. the friend was all right, the stranger being dragged about. At 2.30 p.m. ditto. The stranger was soon afterwards dragged out of the nest. The friend, whom ’ I watched at intervals till 6.30 P.m., continued on the best terms with the others; it was quite clear, there- fore, that they did not regard her as a stranger. She herself was not afraid of, and did not avoid them. Still for some time she apparently wished to return to the ants with whom she had recently lived. She came out of the nest, and tried to find her way home. I put her back again, however, and by the even- ing she seemed to have accustomed herself to the 2 338 RECOGNITION OF FRIENDS change. I then opened the door of the nest soon after 5 p.M.; but she showed no wish to leave her newly re- joined friends. September 1.—At 11 a.m. I again put into each half of the nest an ant from the other and a stranger. In the one nest the friend joined the other ants, and seemed quite at home; the stranger, on the contrary, en- deavoured to conceal herself, and at length, at 4 in the afternoon, escaped from the nest. In the other division the friend also appeared quite athome. The stranger, on the contrary, endeavoured to escape, but in the course of the afternoon was attacked and killed. October 15.—At 8 a.M. I repeated the same experi- ment. In the first nest, up to 10 a.M., neither ant was attacked ; and it is curious that the stranger was licked, and, indeed, almost cleaned. Soon afterwards, however, the ants began to attack her, and at three p.m. she was expelled, the friend, on the contrary, being quite at home. Still the following day, at noon, I found her out of the nest (all the rest being within). This almost looks as if, though safe, she did not feel happy; and I accordingly put her back to her old home, which she at once entered. In the other division the friend was soon nearly cleaned, and the stranger partly so. The friend seemed quite at home. At 12.30 the stranger was being dragged about by three ants; but after this I lost sight of her. November 10.—At 11.30 put into one of the divi- sions a friend anda stranger. At 12 the friend was all right, the stranger was being dragged about by an antenna. From this time till 7 p.m. the stranger was continually being dragged about or held a prisoner, while the friend was quite at home. Yovember 11.—At 10.15 I put into the other division a friend and a stranger. At 1] the friend was AFTER LONG SEPARATION. 339 quite at home, and the colour with which I had marked her had been almost cleaned off. The stranger, on the contrary, was being dragged about by two of the ants. After this, however, I could not find her. She had, no doubt, escaped from the nest. November 12.—The following day, therefore, at 11.30, I again put a friend and a stranger into this division of the nest. The friend seemed quite at home. One of the ants at once seized the stranger by an antenna and began dragging her about. I will give this observation in detail out of my note-book. At 11.45. The friend is quite at home with the rest; the stranger is being dragged about. At 12. The friend is all right. Three ants now have hold of the stranger by her legs and an antenna. At 12.15, 12.30, 12.45, and at 1 the stranger was thus held a prisoner. At 1.30 one now took hold of the friend, but soon seemed to find out her mistake, and left go again. At 1.45. The friend is all right. The stranger is being attacked. The friend also has been almost cleaned, while on the stranger the colour has been scarcely touched. At 2.15. Two ants are licking the friend, while another pair are holding the stranger by her legs, At 2.30. The friend is now almost clean; so that I could only just perceive any colour. The stranger, on the contrary, is almost as much coloured as ever. She is now near the door, and, I think, would have some out, but two ants met and seized her. At 3. Two ants are attacking the stranger. The friend is no longer distinguishable from the rest. At 3.30, 3.40, and 5 the stranger was still held a prisoner. At 6.0. The stranger now escaped from the nest, and I put her back among her own friends. December 11.—At 10 a.m. I again put in a friend 22 340 RECOGNITION OF FRIENDS AFTER A and a stranger. The friend was not attacked, and con- sorted peaceably with the rest. I found her again all right on the following morning. The stranger, on the contrary, was soon attacked and expelled. December 22.—Repeated the same experiment. The stranger was attacked and driven out of the nest. The friend was received quite amicably. December 26.—Ditto. The friend was received as usual. I lost sight of the stranger, who probably escaped. December 31.—Ditto. The stranger, after being dragged about some time in the nest, made her escape. But even outside, having met with an ant accidentally, she was viciously attacked. January 15, 1877.—Ditto. January 16.—I put in two friends; but thinking the preceding experiments sufficient, I did not on this occasion add a stranger. Neither of the friends was attacked. January 19.—Put in two friends at 11 A.M. Neither was attacked, and the following morning they were all right amongst the rest. January 22.—Put in three friends with the same result. January 24.—Put in two friends with the same result. January 26.—Put in three friends with the same result. February 11.—I put in two friends from the other division at 10 a.m. I looked at 10.15, 10.30, 11, 11.30, 12, 2,4, and 6 p.m. They were on every occa- sion quite at home amongst the others. February 12.—Put in three from the other division at 12. They were quite at home. I looked at them at 12.30, 1, 2, 4, and 6. Only for a minute or two at first one appeared to be threatened. February 13.—Put in one friend from the other division. The ant was put in at 9.15 a.m., and I looked SEPARATION OF MORE THAN A YEAR. 341 at 9.30, 10, 11, 12, and 1. She was evidently quite at home. February 15.—Ditto. The ant was put in at 10.15 A.M., and visited at 10.30, 11, 12, 1, 2, 3, and 4. She was not attacked. February 19.—Ditto. The ant was put in at 10 A.M., and I looked at 10.15, 10.30, 11, 12, 1, and 2. She was not attacked. March 11.—Ditto. Ditto at 9.30 a.m.; visited at 10.30, 12.30, 2.30, and 5.30. She was not attacked. March 12.—Ditto. Ditto at 10 a.m.; I looked at 12, 2, and 4. She was not attacked. March 18.—Put in two friends at 1 p.M.; I looked at 2 and 4. She was not attacked. April 21.—Put in one friend at 9.30 a.m. At 10 she was all right, also at 12 and 4 P.M. She was not attacked. April 22.—Put in two friends at 8.30 a.m. I looked at them at 9 and 10, when they were almost cleaned. After that I could not find them; but I looked at 2, 4, and 6, and must have seen if they were being attacked. Apri 23.—Put in two friends at 12.32. I looked at them at 1, 2,3,4,and 6 p.m. They were not attacked. May 13.—Put in two friends and a stranger at 7.45. At 9 the two friends were with the rest. The stranger was in a corner by herself. 11 ditto, 12 ditto. At 1 the friends were all right; the stranger was being attacked. 2, the friends all right; the stranger had been dragged out of the nest. The next morning { looked again; the two friends were all right. May 14.—Put in the remaining three friends at 10. I looked at them at 11, 12, 1, 2,4,and 6. They were not attacked, and seemed quite at home. This completed the experiment, which had lasted from August 4, 1875, till May 14, 1877, when the last ones were restored to their friends. In no case was a friend attacked. 342 RECOGNITION OF FRIENDS AFTER A The difference of behaviour to friends and strangers was therefore most marked. The friends were gradually licked clean, and except for a few moments, and that probably by mistake, never attacked. The strangers, on the contrary, were not cleaned, were at once seized, were dragged about for hours with only a few minutes’ interval, by one, two, or three assailants. Though the above experiment seemed to me con- clusive, I thought it would be well to repeat it with another nest. I therefore separated a nest of Formica fusca into two portions on October 20, 1876. On February 25, 1877, at 8 a.M. I put an ant from the smaller lot back among her old companions. At 8.30 she was quite comfortably established among them. At 9 ditto, at 12 ditto, and at 4 ditto. June 8.—I put two specimens from the smaller lot back as before among their old friends. At 1 they were all right and among the others. At 2 ditto. After this I could not distinguish them amongst the rest; but they were certainly not attacked. June 9.—Put in two more at the same hour. Up to 3 in the afternoon they were neither of them attacked. Qn the contrary, two strangers from different nests, which I introduced at the same time, were both very soon attacked. July 14.—I put in two more of the friends at 10.15. In a few minutes they joined the others, and seemed quite at home. At 11 they were among the others. At 12 ditto, and at 1 ditto. July 21.—At 10.15 I put in two more of the old friends. At 10.30 I looked; neither was being attacked. At 11 ditto, 12 ditto, 2 ditto, 4 ditto, and 6 ditto. October 7.—At 9.30 I put in two, and watched them carefully till 1. They joined the other ants and SEPARATION OF MORE THAN A YEAR. 343 were not attacked. I also put in a stranger from another nest. Her behaviour was quite different. She kept away from the rest, running off at once in evident fear, and kept wandering about, seeking to escape. At 10.30 she got out; I put her back, but she soon escaped again. I then put in another stranger. She was almost immediately attacked. In the meantime the old friends were gradually cleaned. At 1.30 they could scarcely be distinguished ; they ° seemed quite at home, while the stranger was being dragged about. After 2 I could no longer distinguish them. They were, however, certainly not attacked. The stranger, on the contrary, was killed and brought out of the nest. This case, therefore, entirely confirmed the pre- ceding, in which strangers were always attacked; friends were in most cases amicably received, even after more than a year of separation. But while the stranyers were invariably attacked and expelled, the friends were not always recognised, at least at first. It seemed as if some of the ants had forgotten them, or perhaps the young ones did not recognise them. Even, however, when the friends were at first attacked, the aggressors soon seemed to discover their mistake, and friends were never ultimately driven out of the nest. This recogni- tion of old friends after a separation of more than a year seems to me very remarkable. The details are, I fear, tedious, but I have thought them worth giving, because a mere general statement, without particulars, would not give so clear an idea of the result. 344 POWER OF COMMUNICATION APPENDIX C. THE following are the details of the observation re- corded on p. 161 :— At 9.45 I put an ant (N1) to a raisin. At 9.50 she went to the nest. 9.55 I put another (N2) to the raisin. 10.0 she went to the nest. 10. 0 N1 came back. 10.2 she went to the nest. 10. 7 N1 came back. 10.9 she went to the nest. 10.11 N2 came back. 10.13 she went to the nest. 10.12 N1 came back. 10.14 she went to the nest. 10.13 put another (N3) to the raisin. 10.18 she went to the nest. 10.16 N1 came back. 10.17 she went to the nest. 10.22 N2 came back. 10.24 she went to the nest. (1 here overpainted N2, and she returned no more.) At 10.24 N1 came back. 10.26 she went to the nest. 10.30 N1 came back. 10.32 she went to the nest. 10.33 N3 came back. 10.35 she went to the nest. POWER OF COMMUNICATION. 345 At 10.35 Nl came back. (She met with an acci- At first she seemed a good deal hurt, but dent. gradually recovered.) At 10.40 N3 came back. At 11.11 a stranger came; marked her N4. 11.16 N3 came. 10.46 she went to the nest. 10.46 a stranger came; I imprisoned her. 10.47 10.52 N1 came back ”° ”° e 39 10.54 she went to the nest. 10.57 N3 came back. 11.2 she went to the nest. 11. 8 N3 came back. 11.13 she went to the nest. 11.10 a stranger came; I removed her to a little distance. 11.23 N4 11.24 N3 11.27 N4 11.31 N3 11.32 N4 11.40 N3 11.40 N4 11.45 N3 ” » a stranger came. 11.48 N1 came. 11.49 N4 11.51 N1 12.13 N3 At 11.18 went. 11.25 11.26 11.29 11.34 11.35 11.42 ” 11.47 11.49 11.50 11.53 11.56 11.56 12. 2 ” ”» 12, 7 12. 8 12.15 346 POWER OF COMMUNICATION, At 12.14 N4 came. 12.15 went. 12.17 a stranger came. 12.19 N4 came. 12:20 12:20 Na ~,; 1222) es 12:21 NI, 12525) uss 12.25 N4_,, TAG 12 2eN owes 12.28 5: 12.30 N4 12:32" 5 39 9» a stranger came. »» N3(was disturbed) 12.37 ,, 12.38 N4 came. 12:40 ,, 12.42 N3 12.47 N4_ ,, 12.49 ,, Thus during these three hours only six strangers vame. The raisin must have seemed almost inexhaust- ible, and the watched ants in passing and repassing went close to many of their friends; they took no notice of them, however, and did not bring any out of the nest to co-operate with them in securing the food though their regular visits showed how much they appreciated it. Again (on July 15), an ant belonging to one of my nests of Formica fusca was out hunting. At 8.8 I put a spoonful of honey before her. She fed till 8.24, when she returned to the nest. Several others were running about. She returned as follows :— 9.10 to the honey, but was disturbed, ran away, and returned at 10.40. At 10.53 went back to the nest 3 ASO on - . 12.5 but was disturbed ; she ran away again, but Fe 1.30 At 1.44 to the nest; a 2. 0 Pe 245) 9 a - Sent ee 5) s > 3.34 » 3-45 % io 4,15 423s POWER OF COMMUNICATION. 347 Returned at 4.52 At 5. 3 went back to the nest. ” 5.56 » 6.10 ” 9 ” 6.25 ” 6.45 ” ” ” 7.13 =) 7.18 ” ” ” 7.45 » 8.0 ” ” 3 OE Oy ae ae »” 9.18 » 9.30 ” 2 » 10.10 1020, - During the whole day she brought no friend, and only one other ant found the honey, evidently an inde- pendent discovery, 348 POWER OF COMMUNICATION, APPENDIX D, THE following are the details referred to on page 164 :— September 27, 1875.—At 3.55 p.m. I put an ant (Lasius niger) to some larve. She returned as follows :— 4,3 5. 5 4.11 5.10 4,21 5.14 4.25 5.18 4.28 §.23 4.31 5.29 4.37 5.40 4.40 5.43 4.44 5.46 4.48 5.50 4.52 5.54 4.56 5.59 5. 0 when she met with an accident. During this time no other ant came to the larve. On October 1, 1875, at 6 15 a.m., I put three speci- POWER OF COMMUNICATION. 349 mens of Lasius niger to some larve. One did not return ; the other two behaved as follows :— No. 1 returned to the larvzs at No. 2 at Other ants came at 6.52 (eae, 7.14 to lot 2. Woe 7.30 q232 aaa 1.42 7.45 to lot 3. 7.50 7.54 8. 0 8. 1 8. 6 witha triend. 8. 6 8. 9 8.10 8517 8.19 to lot 1. 8:23. 1 =, 8.25 8.26 8.32 8.36 8:37 5s 8.38 8.39 8.41 8.44 8.45 5; Here I left off watching for half an hour. 9.22 9.28 9.29 9,35 9.35 350 POWER OF COMMUNICATION. No. 1 returned to the larve at No. 2 at Other ants came at 9.4] 9.45 9.47 9.50 9.52 9.54 with a friend. 9.57 9.58 to lot 1. 10. 0 10. 1 10. 9 10.11 10.13 with a friend. 10.16 10.16 19.25 10.30 10.36 10.46 10.50 10.55 10.58 11. O ll. 2 11. 3 18 ear é 1l. 8 11.15 11.16 11.19 11.19 11.23 11.25 Ub a! 11.29 with a friend. 11.30 11.33 11 35 POWER OF COMMUNICATION. 351 No, 1 returned to the larve at No. 2 at Other ants came at W134 11.41 11.42 11.45 11.47 to lot 1. 11.48 11.49 11.53 11.59 12.1 12. 4 12. 8 12. 9 12.11 1204 12.15 , 12.15 12.18 1219 ,, 12.20 12 21 12.25 12.29 with a friend. 12.30 12.385 12.36 12.39 12.42 12.43 12.45 12.47 12.48 12.51 12.53 12.54 12.56 12.57 12.57 1. O with frend. 1. 0 $52 POWER OF COMMUNICATION. No. 1 returned to the larve at No. 2 at Other ants came at I. 2 1 5 Coe 1. 9 1.10 1.11 to lot 1. 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.18 1.18 ee | 1.24 132 1.27 1.28 1.30 1.33 1.35 1.36 1.39 1.42 1.42 1.45 1.46 1.48 1.48 1.51 1.53 1.57 1.59 2. 1 2. 4 2.15 rey | 2.2) 2.22 2.25 2.29 2.31 POWER OF COMMUNICATION. 353 No. 1 returned to the larvss at No.2 at Other ants came at 2.33 2.37 2.39 2.40 2.43 2.44 2.47 2.49 2.50 2.54 2.57 3. 0 3. 4 with a friend. 3. 6 3. 9 with a friend. 3.12 3.14 3.16 3.16 3.20 3.21 3.23 3.26 3.26 3.30 3.30 3.33 3.33 Soo 3.35 3.37 3.36 3.39 3.41 3.43 3.45 3.46 3.48 3.49 3.54 4. 0 AA 854 POWER OF COMMUNICATION. No. 1 returned to the larves at No.2 at Other ants came at 4. 3 4.4 4. 7 4.12 4.15 4.20 4.26 4.29 4.31 4,32 4.34 4.36 4,39 4,40 4.42 4.43 4.44 4.45 4.49 4.49 4.55 4.56 4.58 4.59 5. 2 Bone 5. 6 with two friends, Pers after which she came no more. The first ant returned at 5.10 513 Halo 5.18 5:21 5.25 5.28 6.31 §.53 to lot 2. POWER OF COMMUNICATION 356 The first ant returned at 5.35 7.28 5.38 7.31 5.41 7.34 5.45 7.38 5.51 7.41 5.54 7.44 6. 0 7.47 6. 4 7.51 6. 7 7.55 6.14 7.59 6.17 8. 2 6.20 8. 5 6.28 8.12 6.31 8.15 6.48 8.18 6.54 8.20 7. 0 8.24 7. 3 8.28 «. 6 8.32 all 8.35 7.14 8.38 7.18 8.42 7.21 8.44 another 7.24 8:45 [ant came 7.25 9.44 We continued to watch till 10.15, but she came no more. She had, however, in the day carried off to the nest no less than 187 larve. She brought 5 friends with her; less than 20 other ants came to the larva. October 3.—I put a Lasius niger to some larve. She returned as follows, viz:— 1.42 2. 4 1.48 2. 8 1.52 2.12 with a stranger. 2. 0 2.15 356 POWER OF COMMUNICATION. 2.19 4, 7 2.24 4.10 2.27 4.12 2.32 4.15 2.36 4.18 2.40 4.22 2.44 4.25 2.49 4.29 2.57 4.32 3. 1 4.35 3. 4 4.38 3. 7 4.43 3.10 4.46 3.13 4.49 3.15 4.54 3.18 4.57 3.20 5. 0 3.23 5. 3 3.31 5. 6 3.35 5.10 3.38 5.14 3.41 5.18 3.49 with a friend. §.22 3.51 5.26 3.54 5.29 3.57 She dropped on the floor 4. 1 of my room. 4. 4 I picked her up; and she returned at 6.40 7. 7 with 3 friends. 6.50 7.11. She now fell into 6.54 scme water. 7. 4 In addition to the ahove experiments with larva, I tried the following with syrup. POWER OF COMMUNICATION. 357 April 19.—I put out a little syrup on eleven slips of glass,which I placed on eleven inverted flower potson the Jawn. At 8.35 a Lasius niger found the honey on one of the flower-pots. she returned to the 8.50 | et ae } 9. 5 went back to the nest. 9.21 ” ” 9.30 ” 9 9.42 ” ry) 9.50 ey) ” 10.12 a i 10.21 - & 10.35 i. s 10.46 i - 11. 9 S bs 11.20 es 11.45 * rs 11.50 as i 11.57 33 “5 Pas 45 ar 12.20 ‘. - 12.30 és i 12.45 6 “ 12.53 ‘ fs 1. 8 ry) ” 1.18 ” ” 1.34 99 9 1.43 9 ” 1.57 9 ry) 2.7 ry) ” 2.28 ” ” 2.33 9 ” 2.49 ” ” 2.53 ” 99 2.59 99 99 3. 2 9 ” 3. 9 99 ” 3.11 ”° ” 3.29 3 ” 3.30 ” %” 3.59 A 3 4. 8 ry) ” After which I watched till 6 P.m.; but she did not return again tothe honey. During the above time eight ants came to the same honey, and twenty-one to the other ten deposits. On July 11 I put one of my specimens of Lasius miger to some honey at 7.10. She fed till 7.25, when she returned to the nest. At 7.32 she returned. At 7.36 another ant came, 7.47 eA 7.50 [whom I imprisoned. 8. 0 95 8.11 % 3 8.18 is 358 POWER OF COMMUNICATION. At 8.36 she returned. 8.59 i 9°17 2 9.38 . 9.53 Bs 10.10 i 10.27 if 10.44 id 11.16 99 11.38 a 12. 0 fe 12.36 a At 12.45 another ant came, [whom I imprisoned. 12.56 = 1.21 ic 1.44 7 2.10 us 2.21 2.29 -- 2.50 be 2.51 a 3. 5 ey After this she did not come back any more up to 8 P.M. April 25 was a beautiful day. At 9 a.m. I put some syrup in the same way on five inverted flower-pots, and at 9.10 put an ant to one of the deposits of syrup. At 9.34 another ant came to the samesyrup. This one I willcall No 2. At 9.40 No. 1 returned. 10.45 No. 2 as At 11 one came to the same honey; this one I will call No. 3. ll. 7 No. 1 = but did not come back any more. 12.31 No. 2 ab and at 12.47 went. POWER OF COMMUNICATION, 359 1.15 No. 3 returned, and at 1.25 went. 122No.2 , ae gf has [54No.3 *; Balad PORTS a 55 2.18No.2 ,, et i DSO op 2.35No.3 ,, fy BIKigei sss 256No.2 4 rl I gdagnrce 3.24 No. 2 returned. 4.19 No.2 ,, After which I went on watching till 7, but none of these three returned. During the day 7 ants cam: to this honey, and 27 to the other four deposits. Here, therefore, it is evident that the three watched ants did not communicate, at any rate, any exact information to their friends. June 27, 1875.—I placed four inverted glasses (tumblers) on the grass, and on the top of each placed a little honey. I then, at 8 o'clock, put two ants, be- longing to F. nigra, to the honey on one of the glasses. At 8.25 No. 1 came back, and at 8.45 she returned to the nest, but did not come to the honey any more. At 9.5 No. 2 came out and wandered about ; 1 put her to the honey again; she fed and at 9.22 returned to the nest. she returned to the went back to the OU: honey, and at se nest. 10.42 Bes 10.50 i 10.58 Bere 11.10 fe 11.21 irc 11.39 fi 12.45 KEY Te 12.59 ie 1.40 9 » I continued to watch till 7 p.M., but neither of them returned any more. August 7, 1875.—I put out four small deposits of honey (which I continually renewed) on slips of glass placed on square pieces of wood, and put an ant (LD. niger) to one of them at 9.20. She fed and went away. 360 POWER OF COMMUNICATION, At 9.35 she returned, and fed till 9.43 10.14 10.25 10.37 ” ” 9 3” ” 39 10.17 10.27 10.40 This time a friend came with her. At 10.47 she returned, and fed till 10.53 11. 0 11.35 12.52 12.13 11.14 11.40 11.55 At this time there was a shower of rain, so I removed the honey for half an hour. At 5. 2 she returned, and fed till 5.10 5.20 5.33 5.42 5.50 5.98 6.15 6.21 39 5.25 5.37 5.45 5.52 6. 6 6.18 6.23 POWER OF COMMUNICATION. 361 At 6.25 she returned, and fed till 6.27 6.32 i: o 6.35 6.40 ‘s 6.44 6.49 i ks 6.53 7.15 i ae 7.20 7.25 s 7.27 7.30 i . 7.33 7.36 i cs 7.37 During the whole of this time only three other ants came to the honey. On January 3, 1875, I placed some larve in three small porcelain saucers in a box 7 inches square attached to one of my frame-nests of Lasius flavus (Pl. I. Fig. 2). The saucers were in a row 6 inches from the en- trance to the frame, and 14 inch apart from one another. At 1.10 an ant came to the larvae in the cup which I will call No. 1, took a larva, and returned to the nest. 1.24 she returned and took another. 1.45 ” 9 2.10 she went to the further saucer, No. 3. I took her up and put her to No. 1. She took a larva and returned. 2.24 she returned to cup No. 3. As there were only two larve in this cup, I left her alone. She took one and returned. 2.31 she returned to cup No. 3 and took the last larva. 2.40 she came back to cup No. 3 and searched diligently, went away and wandered about for two minutes, then returned for another look, and at length at 2.50 went to cup No. 1 and took a larva. 3. 0 came to cup 1 and took a larva. 3. 7 ” 9 362 3.15 3.18 3.30 3.43 3.53 4. 3 4.15 4.22 4.38 5. 0 5.19 5.50 6.20 POWER OF COMMUNICATION. came to cup 1 and took a larva, first, however, going and examining cup 3 again. came to cup 3, then went to cup 2 and took a larva. 39 39 9 ) ” 33 99 ” came to cup 3, but did not climb up it, then went to cup 2 and took a larva, which she either dropped or handed over to another ant; for without returning to the nest, at 3.55 she returned to the empty cup, and then to cup 2, where she took the last larva, so that two cups are now empty. she came to cup 3, then to cup 2, and lastly to cup 1, when she took a larva. came to cup 1 and took a larva. ? 99 b> 39 came to cup 3, then to cup 2, and lastly to cup 1, when she took a larva. came to cup 1 and took a larva. aS 2, and then to cup 1 and took a larva. os 1 and took the last larva. I now put about 80 larve into cup 3. It is remarkable that during all this time she never came straight to the cups, but took a roundabout and apparently irresolute course. At 7.4 she came to cup 1, and then to cup 3, and then home. There were at least a dozen ants exploring in the box; but she did not send any of them to the larvee. At 7.30 she returned to cup 3 and took a larva. I now left off watching for an hour. Onmy return at 8.30 she was just carrying off a larva. 8.40 she came back to cup 3 and took a larva. 8.55 she came to cup 1, then to cup 3 and took a larva, 9.12 ” bP] 39 ” POWER OF COMMUNICATION. 363 9.30 she came to cup 2, then to cup 3 and took a larva. 9.52 9 ry) ” ” 10.14 ” 1 9 ” 10.26 she went and examined cup 2, then to cup 3 and took a larva. At 10.45 she came to cup 3, and I went to bed. At 7 o’clock the next morning the larve were all removed. In watching this ant I was much struck by the difficulty she seemed to experience in finding her way. She wandered about at times most irresolutely, and, instead of coming straight across from the door of the frame to the cups, kept along the side of the box; so that in coming to cup 3 she went twice as far as she need have done. Again, itis remarkable that she should have kept on visiting the empty cups time after time. I watched for this ant carefully on the following day ; but she did not come out at all. During the time she was under observation, from 1 till 10.45, though there were always ants roaming about, few climbed up the walls of the cup. Five found their way into the (empty) cup 1, and one only to cup 3. It is clear, therefore, that the ant under observation did not communicate her discovery of larve to her friends. In the afternoon of the following day I watched the ant which had been under observation on the 3rd Jan. From 3.27 to 9.30 she made forty-two visits, during which time only four other ants came to the larve. On January 10 I watched the same ant as on the 4th. Between 11 a.m. and 10 p.m. she made no less than ninety-two visits ; and during the whole time only one strange ant came to the larve. On January 18 I put out some more larve in the small porcelain cups. Between 8 and 9 both these ants found them, and kept on coming all day up to 7 P.M., when I left off observing. There were a good many ants wandering about in the box; but up to 4 o’clock only four came to the larve. Two of them I impri- soned as usual; but two (which came at 4.30 and 4.36) 364 POWER OF COMMUNICATION. I marked. These went on working quietly with the first. two till I left off observing at 7 P.M.; and during this latter time only three other ants found the larve. On January 31 I watched another specimen. At 9.14 I put her into a small cup containing a number of larve. She worked continuously till half-past seven in the evening, when I left off watching. During that time she had made more than ninety journeys, carrying each time a larva to the nest. During the whole time not a single other ant came to the larve. Again, on February 7, I watched two ants in the same manner. At 7 a.m. I put some larve in the small china cups. Up to 8 no ants had come to them. Soon after 8 I put two marked ants, neither of them being the same as those whose movements are above recorded. They were then watched until 7.45 p.M., during which time one of them had made twenty-six journeys, carry- ing off a larva each time ; the other forty-two. During this period of about eleven hours, two other ants had come to the cup at which these were working, and the same number to one of the other cups. None of these ants, therefore, though they had found a large number of larvae, more than they could carry in a whole day, summoned any other to their assistance. I repeated this several times with similar results. The following case is particularly striking. On July 11,1875, at 11 a.M.,I put a Lasius flavus to some pupz of the same species, but from a different nest. She made eighty-six journeys, each time carrying off a pupa, with the following intervals. Commencing— At 11. 0 At 11.29 again. 11. 5 she returned. 11.4977; 11. 9 returned again. COD Nass 11.16 again. 120M tes 1208s 1265 11.24 , 12.16 4, 11.26 ,, TY. 5 POWER OF COMMUNICATION, 365 At 12.40 again. At 3.40 again. 12:44”, gn Be 12.50 ,, CeED Ligh a iss 3:57 5 iO"; AiO) 2h elo An S45 127, 455 "55 eee ees 4580) 14g. Ay Oy ire 1.49) 415 0s, 152° 25, rst i 1:56 | 55 AO i. Dep ane 4.93115, 210 5 4.26 ,, Durga 4630, a 2.25 4 rip cues 2.29 ,, 4.40 ,, oom. GEAR. is 2.35 5 4.45 4, Oye ane AAOin\s. 2.40 5, 4.53 ,, 243, 4.55 ,, DAT |: a5secn 2.53 yy GUSH es, 2.56 45 Sat ss 2.59 5, CaO ae oa 5.19 ,, amet 5.22 4, SHO. 5.25 yy PH ae 5.28 ,, sigue. Sey Mane 3.20 ,, 5.35 45 3.25 ~ 55 5.39 ., S.3a 5.50 49 3.35 ,, Oe Otess 3.38 ” 1G 12 99 366 EXPERIMENTS ON After which she did not come again till 8, when we left off watching. During the whole of this time she did not bring a single ant to help her. Surely it would have been in many respects desirable to do so. It will be seen that some of the pupzw remained lying about and exposed to many dangers from 11 a.M. till 7 P.M.; and when she left off working at that time, there were still a number of the pupze unsecured ; and yet, though she had taken so much pains herself, she did not bring or send others to assist her in her efforts or to complete her work. I have given the above cases at length, though I fear they may appear tedious and prolix, because they surprised me much. No doubt it more frequently happens that if an ant or a bee discovers a store of food, others soon find their way to it, and I have been anxious to ascertain in what manner this is effected. Some have regarded the fact as a proof of the power of communication; others, on the contrary, have denied that it indicated any such power. Ants, they said, being social animals, naturally accompany one another; moreover, seeing a companion coming home time after time with a larva, they would naturally conclude that they also would find larve in the same spot. It seemed to me that it would be very interesting to determine whether the ants in question were brought to the larve, or whether they came casually. I thought therefore that the following experi- ment might throw some light on the question, viz.: to place several small quantities of honey in similar situations, then to bring an ant to one of them, and subsequently to register the number of ants visiting each of the parcels of honey, of course imprisoning for the time every ant which found her way to the honey except the first. If, then, many more came to the honey whieo had been shown to the first ant than to the other parcels, this would be in favour of their POWER OF COMMUNICATION, 367 possessing the power of communicating facts to one another, though it might be said they came by scent. Accordingly, on July 13, 1874, at 3 p.m., I took a piece of cork about 8 inches long and 4 inches wide, and stuck into it seventeen pins, on three of which I put pieces of card with a little honey. Up to 5.15 no ant had been up any of these pins. I then put an ant (Lasius niger) to the honey on one of the bits of card. She seemed to enjoy it, and fed for about five minutes, after which she went away. At 5.30 she returned, but went up six pins which had no honey on them. I then put her on to the card. In the mean time twelve other ants went up wrong pins and two up to the honey ; these I imprisoned for the afternoon. At 5.46 my first ant went away. From that time to 6 o’clock seven ants came, but the first did not return. One of the seven went up a wrong pin, but seemed surprised, came down, and immediately went up to the right one. The other. six went straight up the right pin to the honey. Up to 7 o'clock twelve more ants went up pins—eight right, and four wrong. At 7 two more went wrong. Then my first ant returned, bringing three friends with her ; and they all went straight to the honey. At 7,11 she went home: on her way to the nest she met and accosted two ants, both of which then came straight to the right pin and up it to the honey. Up to 7.20 seven more ants came and climbed up pins—-six right, and one wrong. At 7.22 my first ant came back with five friends; at 7.30 she went away again, returning at 7.45 with no less than twenty companions. During this experiment I imprisoned every ant that found her way up to the honey. Thus, while there were seven- teen pins, and consequently sixteen chances to one, yet between 5.45 and 7.45 twenty-seven ants came, not counting those which were brought by the original ant ; and out of these twenty-seven, nineteen went straight up the right pin. Again, on the 15th July, at 2.30, J 368 EXPERIMENTS ON put out the same piece of cork with ten pins, each with a piece of card and one with honey. At 4.401 put an ant to the honey; she fed comfortably, and went away at 4.44 At 4.45 she returned, and at 5. 5 went away again. 10.13 ° and again at 6.25 and 6.59. There were a good many other ants about, which, up to this time, went up the pins indiscriminately. At 7.15 an ant came and went up the right pin, and another at 7.18. At 7.26 the first ant came back with a friend, and both went up the right pin. At 7.28 another came straight to the honey. At 7.30 one went up a wrong pin. 7.31 one came to the right pin re Teste “5 a with the firstant. ” 7.39 b>) 99 99 7.40 ” 9 Pais. 3 on Ps b+) 7.43 99 99 +>) 7.45 99 33 +>) 7.46 99 99 E “ <5 wrong pin. 39 bb] bb) » UAT tWO 4, as se S LONG a. right pin. ,, the first ant came back. 7.49 another ant came to the right pin. 99 7.00 os os Wrong 5, 9 7.51 ” ” right 4, » three ants ,, Wrong 4, », 7.02 one ant es right ,, 3 1.55 5 99 Wine ” ” right 45 39 ” 7.67 9 7 WIONY 355 * POWER OF COMMUNICATION. 369 At 7.58 one ant came to the right pin. », 7.59 5, ” Wrong ;, Thus after 7 o’clock twenty-nine ants came; and though there were ten pins, seventeen of them went straight to the right pin. Qn the 16th July I did the same again. At 6.25 I put an ant to the honey; at 6.47 she went. At 6.49 an ant came to the right pin. », 6.50 another - 3 » 6.55 4, ” 9 53, G00" 55 »» | Wrong pin, and then to the right one. sy Baats » Tight pin. » 7. 0 ° 9 ” ” 5, 7’. 5 the first ant came back, and remained at the honey till 7.11. », ¢. 5 another came to the right pin; but she was with the first. »» ¢ 6 another ant came to the right pin. » 7. 6 ” » 7.12 » » 1.13 ” These two ants were met by the first one, which crossed antenns# with them, when they came straight to the honey. At 7.14 another ant came straight to the honey. », 7.21 the first ant returned ; ‘at 7.26 she left. », 7.24 another ant came, but went first to a wrong pin, and then on to the right one. »» an ant came to wrong pin. 99 99 ” 99 A », 7.38 the first came back, at 7.45 went away again. BB 370 EXPERIMENTS ON At 7.42 an ant went to a wrong pin. 9” 7. 47 ” bb) 3) ” 7.48 99 3° ” ” (E 49 99 39 ep ecoe 5 the right pin. a coo the first ant returned, and at 7.56 went away again. », ¢@.57 an ant went to wrong pin. By Uidals) ‘3 right 4, » 8. 0 % WEORS 33 39 ” right ,, APR: Aan | Bs wrong ,, After this, for an hour no more ants came. On this occasion, therefore, while there were ten pins, out of thirty ants, sixteen came to the right one, while four- teen went to one orother of the nine wrong ones. July 18.—I put out the boards as before at 4 o’clock. Up to 4.25 no ant came. _ I then put one (No. 1) to the honey; she fed for a few minutes, and went away at 4.31. At 4.35 she came back with four friends, and went nearly straight tothe honey. At 4.42 she went away, but came back almost directly, fed, and went away again. At 4.57 she returned, and at 5.8 went away again. » 4.45 an ant came to wrong pin. 9 4.47 ” 9 99 4.49 ” Re Mal 9 4.50 5 right pin. x9 4.52 ” Es 9 4.59 9 wrong pin. » 4.56 a right pin. This ant (No. 2) I allowed toreturn tothe nest, which she did at 5.23. fbn 7 right pin. p 51k % wrong pin. POWER OF COMMUNICATION. 371 At 5.12 an ant came to right pin. I changed the pin. » 5.16 an ant came to the pin which I had put in the same place. ” ” right pin. Pole 0), . », 5.20 two ants = with No. 2 » ant No.1 7 and went at 5.25. » 5.25 an ant s This ant had been spoken to by No. 2. », 0.26 another ant 5 99 5.39 Ey) 99 9 5.37 ” 9 9 5.40 9 » 5.41 ant No. 1 9 and went at 5.49. 5, 5.45 another ant “ 9 0-00 oF », 5.51 ant No. 1 came back, and 5.54 went. », 5.58 two ants came to the right Ba », 5.59 another ant ‘5 es came to a wrong pin. I changed the pin again. », 6.49 an ant came to the pin which I had put in the same place. 9 @. 1 another ant came to the right pin. »9 1-20 9 ” > 39 ay lle ‘46 ant No. 1 returned, 7. 55 went. Thus during this time, from 4.50 until 7.50, twenty- nine ants came, twenty-six went to the right pin, while only three went up any of the nine wrong ones. More- over, out of these twenty-six, only four were distinctly brought by the two ants which I had shown the honey. On the 19th I tried a similar experiment. The marked ants frequently brought friends with them ; but, BB2 $72 EXPERIMENTS ON without counting these, from 3.20 to 8 o'clock, out of forty-five ants, twenty-nine went up the right pin, while sixteen went up the nine wrong ones. Thus on July 13, out of 27 ants, 19 went right and 8 wrong. 23 15 99 29 99 17 39 12 ” 99 16 9 30 29 16 39 14 ” 29 18 +) 26 29 23 39 3 ” ” 19 99 45 9 29 ” 16 39 Or adding them all together, while there were never less than ten pins, out of 157 ants, 104 came up the right pin, and only 53 up the others. I was at first disposed to infer from these facts that the first ant must have described the route to its friends, but subsequent observations satisfied me that they might have found their way by scent. POWER OF COMMUNICATION, 373 APPENDIX E. Tue following are the details of the experiment referred to on p. 172 :— Experiment 1.—Time occupied, 1 hour. The ant with few larve made 6 visits and brought no friends. The one with many larve made 7, and brought 11 friends. Experiment 2.—Time occupied, 2 hours. The ant with few larve made 13 journeys, and brought 8 friends. The one with many larvw# did not come back. Expervment 3.—Time occupied, 3 hours. The ant with few larvae made 24 journeys, and broughi 5 friends. The one with many larve made 38 journeys, and brought 22 friends. Experiment 4.—-Time occupied, 2}. hours. The ant with few larvae did not come back. The one with many made 32 journeys, and brought 19 friends. Experiment 5.—Time ocupied, 1 hour. The ant with few larvae made 10 journeys, and brought 3 friends. The other made 5 journeys and brought 16 friends. Experiment 6.—Time occupied, 14 hour. The ant with few larvae made 15 journeys, but brought no friends. The other made 11 journeys and brought 21 friends. Experiment 7.—I now reversed the glasses. Time occupied 3 hours. The ant with few larve made 23 journeys and brought 4 friends. 874 EXPERIMENTS ON Experiment 8.—Time occupied, 14 hour. The ant with few larvw made 7 journeys and brought 3 friends, The one with many larve made 19 journeys and brought 6 friends. Experiment 9.—Time occupied, 1 hour. The ant with few larva made 11 journeys and brought 1 friend. The one with many larve made 15 journeys and bronght 13 friends. Experiment 10.—I now reversed the glasses, the same two ants being under observation ; so that the ant which in the previous observation had few larve, now consequently had many, and vice versa. Time occupied 2 hours. The ant with few larve made 21 journeys and brought 1 friend. The one with many larvee made 32 journeys and brought 20 frien:ls. These two experi- ments are, I think, very striking. Experiment 11.—Time occupied, 5 hours. The ant with few larvae made 19 journeys and brought 1 friend. The one with many larve made 26 journeys and brought 10 friends. Experiment 12.—Time occupied, 3 hours. The ant with few larvee made 20 journeys and brought 4 friends. The one with many larve brought no friends and made 17 journeys. Experiment 13.—Time occupied, 1 hour. The ant with few larvee made 5 journeys and brought no friends. The one with many made 10 journeys and brought 16 friends. Experiment 14.—I now reversed the glasses. Time occupied, 24 hours. The ant with few larvae made 10 journeys and brought 2 friends. The other made 41 journeys and brought 3 friends. Experiment 15.—Time occupied, 44 hours. The ant with few larvee made 40 journeys and brought 10 friends. Of these, 8 came at the beginning of the ex- periment, and I much doubt whether they were brought ; during the last hour and a half she only brought 1] POWER OF COMMUNICATION. 375 friend. However, I think it fair to record the observa- tion. The ant with many larva made 47 journeys and brought 1 friend. Experiment 16.—Time, 44 hours. The ant with few larvae made 20 journeysand brought 1 friend. She did not return after the first 2 hours. The other ant made 53 journeys and only brought 2 friends. This latter was the same one as in the previous experiment, when, however, she had the glass with on!y two or three larvee. Experiment 17.—Time, 1 hour. The ant with few larvee made 6 journeys and brought no friend. The one with many larve made 11 journeys and brought 12 friends. Experiment 18.—Time, 14 hour. The ant with few larve made 25 journeys and brought four friends. The one with many larve made 20 journeys and brought 15 friends. Experiment 19.—Time, 44 hours. The ant with few larve made 74 journeys and brought no less than 27 friends. This is quite in opposition to the other observations ; and I cannot account for it. She was the ant who brought 15 friends in the previous experi- ment, and it certainly looks as if some ants were more influential than others. The ant with many larvae made 71 journeys and only brought 7 friends. Experiment 20.—Time, 2 hours. Theant with few larve made 35 journeys and brought 4 friends. The one with many larve made 34 journeys and brought 3 friends. Experiment 21.—I now transposed the two glasses. Time, 14 hour. The ant with few larve made 15 journeys and brought no friends. The other made 35 journeys and brought 21 friends. Experiment 22.—I now transposed the glasses again. Time, 2 hours. The ant with many larve made 376 EXPERIMENTS ON POWER OF COMMUNICATION. 37 journeys and brought 9 friends. The ant with few larve made 18 journeys and brought no friend. This, I think, isa very striking case. She was under observa- tion 5¢ hours; and the scene of her labour was the same throughout. The first 2 hours she had few larvae and brought 4 friends; then for 14 she had many larvae and brought 21 friends; then again for 2 hours she had few ‘larve and brought no friend. Experiment 23.—Time, 14 hour. The ant with few larva made 25 journeys and brought 3 friends, The other made only 9 journeys, but brought 10 friends. Experiment 24.—I now transposed the glasses. Time occupied, 2 hours. The ant which now had few larve made 14 journeys, but brought no friends. The other made 37 journeys and brought 5 friends. Experiment 25.—Time 3 hours. I put an ant for an hour to a full glass; she made 10 journeys and brought 4 friends. I then left only two or three larve: in the second hour she made 7 journeys and brought no friend. I then again filled the glass; and during the third hour she made 14 journeys and brought 3 friends. EXPERIMENTS WITH WASPS, 377 APPENDIX F. THE following are the detailed observations on wasps alluded to in Chapter XI. The first one, I believe a worker of Vespa Germanica, I marked and put to some honey on September 18. The next morning she came for the first time at 7.25, and fed till 7.28, when she began flying about the room, and even into the next ; so I thought it well to put her out of the window, and she then flew straight away to her nest. My room, as already mentioned, had windows on two sides; and the nest was in the direc- tion of a closed window, so that the wasp had to go out of her way in passing out through the open one. At 7.45 she came back. I had moved the glass containing the honey about two yards; and though it stood conspicuously, the wasp seemed to have much difficulty in finding it. Again she flew to the window in the direction of her nest, and I had as before to show her the way out, which I did at 8.2. At 8.15 she returned to the honey almost straight. At 8.21 she flew again to the closed window, and apparently could not find her way, so at 8.35 I put her out again. It seems obvious from this that wasps have a sense of direction, and do not find their way merely by sight. At 8.50 back to honey, and 8.54 again to wrong window; but finding it closed, she took two or three turns round the room, and then flew out through the open window. At 9.24 back to the honey, and 9.27 away, first, however, paying a visit to the wrong window, but without alighting. 378 COMMUNICATION. At 9.36 back to honey; 9.39 away, but, as before, going first to wrong window. She was away, there- fore 9 minutes. 9.50 back to honey; 9.53away.! Interval 11 minutes. 10.0 ,, » 10.7 4, 9 1] ” 10.19 ,, Bees (ee i Oh nee 10:35". 5 sc lO.aoue 52 Sloe ate 10.47 5. 1050s 0 | oe ll. 4 ,, so) Lh sisdh 5p 9 14 ” 112i coy ioe 5, 14 eee T1340 es loa we x’, LO nee 11-49) if ld 620, 6 ¢ dhe 12. 3 9 » 12.5 4, ry) 11 29 12.13 ,, » 12.153 ,, ” 8 ” 12.25 ,, ee OO ss , lone 130K eal odoen 1, Lia 12.54 ,., Sloot a ey 1.15 ,, 99 1.19 ,, ” 18 9 127 4, 9 1.30 ,, ” 8 ” Here for the first time another specimen came to the honey. At 1.37 back to honey; 1 Be away.? 146 ,, » 149 ,, Interval 7 minutes. 1.54 3” 33 138 bP) 99 5 bb) 2 5 ” 99 2 (i 3 39 7 93 2 15 bP) ”° 2 19 39 9 8 ” 2 27 $ 33 > 2 32 33 33 8 bb] 2 39 3 bP) 2 42 bb) +) 7 bb) 2 50 39 3° 2 54 bb] 39 8 99 3 2 3 ” 3 6 39 rb) 8 93 3 14 ” ” 3.17 ” 39 8 bb] 3 26 39 bb] 3.29 99 9” 9 +] 1 This time straight. 2 Was rather disturbed, as I tried to mark her. ® She very often, however, throughout the day, in going away, flew to the other window first, and then, without alighting, returned to and went through the open one. COMMUNICATION, 379 8.38 back to honey; 3.42 away. Interval 9 minutes. 3 58 3.50 ,, 9 ” 29 8 ” 4.7 5, » 412 ,, ” 9 re) 4.20 ,, 9 4.23 ,, re) 8 ” 4.32 ,, » 436 5, ry) 9 ” 4.46 ,, 5 ete. tS a x 5. 0 5, » o 3 4 » Il ” DS as Osh. hs, a LO a 5.26 4, » 5.30 55 ” 9 ” 5.40 ,, » O44 4, LO rn 5.54 ,, se Ocdo ys a LO an 6.7 5 » 6.11 4, 99 8 P) 6.20 6.25 bb) 9 99 39 3) 39 She did not come any more that day; but, as will be seen, she had made forty-five visits to the honey During the whole of this time no strange wasp, except the one above mentioned, came to this honey. The following day, September 20, this wasp made her appearance in my room at 6.55, when she flew in eleven hours. straight to the honey. At 6.55 came to honey; 6.59 went away. “. 8 99 7.10 7.22 7.32 vps) 7.56 Sire 8.18 8.30 8.41 8.53 9. 4 9.15 9.25 9.36 9.51 », Absent 9 minutes. bP) 9 — SOTHO OH DW O CO WO WO © C OO 380 COMMUNICATION. 10. 1 came to honey; 10. 3 away. Absent 10 minutes. 10. 10.13 ” ” 9 10 ” 10.28 is 10.30) ,. >... 10" 10.38 i 10-495). ji. “Smee 10.53 a 10.56>.,., tes.) lee Ly e 11.11-,,. 4.52 Le 11.21 a 11.25, «> a0 11.32 be 11.36. ., 4. Zee The wasp which came once yesterday returned, and rather disturbed the first. At 11.49 came to honey; 11.50 away. Absent 13 minutes. 11.57 oS 2200s, 99 7 » 12. 8 if 1221." |. | Ga, ae Here I was away for about two hours. 2.42 came to honey ; a at away. 2.58 5 » Interval 12 minutes. 3.15 cs ane on els 5 3.25 9 3.28 5 x 8 99 Here I was called away. 4.25 came to honey; 4.28 ,, 4.41 . 445° ,.° 4. 130806 5.15 - 59s, ,, 30 mae 5.30 as 5.35’, ..,, 11 ae 5.45 ‘a 5.50! 4, «100mm 6. 2 99 6.6 5, 99 12 ” 6.15 i 6.17 9 This was the last visit that day. She made, there- fore, thirty-eight visits during the time she was watched, which was not quite eight hours. She was at work from 6.55 to 6.15; and assuming that she was occupied in the same manner during the three hours when she was not watched as during the rest of the time, she would have made over fifty visits to the honey during the day. | Wishing, however, to have a complete record of a day’s work, I watched her the following day without intermission. COMMUNICATION. 381 September 21.—I began watching at ten minutes past six. 6.16 came to honey ; 6.19 away. 6.29 6.41 6.55 7.11 7.23 7.37 7.56 8.11 came to honey; 8.14 away. 8.20 8.31 8.40 8.50 8.58 9398 9.18 9.30 9.39 9.50 10:-1 70.14 0.25 0.37 10.47 ele. 0 BEY. 11.34 11.50 ees 12.20 12.36 1. 8 ” ” 6.32 8.24 8.34 8.42 8.52 9. 0 9.11 9.22 9.32 9.40 9.54 10. 5 10.17 10.28 10.40 10.51 ll. 6 11.20 11.37 11.53 12. 8 12.24 12.40 1.11 Interval 10 minutes. 9 1] 11 8 11 14 Was disturbed, and seemed rather troubled. Interval 8 minutes. —_ ero mono"ONOWNDOOaAD 382 COMMUNICATION, 1.26 came to honey ; 1.28 away. Interval 15 minutes, 1.40 s 143 19: oee 1.57 2 re Ws J tls ae 2.10 9” 2.13 ,, ” 8 ” 2.25 fe 2.30 5 ai 1 Ooaas 2.45 - 2.56 ., >. ae ee She buzzed about at the other window for a few minutes, which made the interval longer than usual. 3.13 came to honey; 3.18 away. Interval 17 minutes. 3.29 » 3.31 5, » il, 3.41 3 3.45 ,, > 10 “p 3.49 a 3.52 ,, os 4 ae 4. 2 99 4.6 “ 7 5 4.19 *9 4.22 , A 13 3 4.29 oS 4.33 ,, fF 7 = 4.40 os 4.44 ,, a 7 3 4.51 or 4.53 4, 3 ¢f = 5. 4 9 SerGass . 11 = 5.16 3 5.20 ,, ss 10 3 5.32 > 5.30" Pes . 12 ae 5.45 ss 5.50, 7 10 s It will be seen that the intervals of her absence were remarkably regular. On one occasion, indeed, she was only away four minutes; but this time I think she had been disturbed, and had not provided herself with a regular supply of food. The number of visits was fifty-one in eleven hours and a half. I tried whether she would be in any way affected by a dead wasp, so I put one on the honey; but she took no notice whatever. I observed with other wasps, that when the open window was not the shortest way to their nests, they had a great tendency to fly to that which was in the right direction, and to remain buzzing about there. INDUSTRY OF WASPS. 383 During the whole of this day only four or five strange wasps came to the honey. As regards the regularity of their visits, and the time occupied, other wasps which I observed agreed very closely with this one For comparison, it may be worth while to give one or two other cases. I will commence with that of a worker, I believe V. vulgaris, observed on September 19. 10 a.m. I put her to the honey; she fed and then flew about the room, and at last got into my bee- hive. 10.54. She came in again at the window. I again put her to the honey. She again flew all about the room. 11.41. She returned, and this time came to the honey; but when she had fed again flew round and round the room, and did not seem able to find her way out. I therefore put her out. 12.11 she returned, and the same thing happened again. 12.28 tendo rack } 12.31 flew straight away. to honey ; 12.45 ” 12.53 i" 12:57, « 1.10 ¥ 1.26 if 1.29, > 1.38 AA 1.41 » Interval 9 minutes 1.50 i L532,’ fe ORE As: Desa ' ae Cre ea.’ qr Oras 2.12 ‘s D.16,, — 5s awe Ud, e Was disturbed. 2.20 A 2.25 re ALT GU: 2.40 ¥ Dag sen Oe hie 2.51 + 2.54 5, a “eUhte 3. 1 99 3. 4 9 ” 7 9 3.13 s S16, 4 5, ok Ob abs 3.25 ‘3 $58) 5 Be) ol ee 384 REGULARITY OF VISITS. came back flew ae 3.35 { \ 3.38 fc Interval 7 minutes. to honey ; 3.46 3 3.50 “A as a 3.58 ” ce Ih ” ” 8 ” 4.10 3 4.14 7 “0 Oe. 4.23 A 4.25 a . SAAT 4.34 ie eae Ws Soe 4.46 a 4:50 vi er 4.58 3 5. 4 os is (2 Siamees 5.14 », Was disturbed and flew about. 8 __,, She did not return any more that evening, but made her appearance again at half-past six the next morning. From twelve o’clock, when she had learnt her way, till five, she made twenty-five visits in five hours, or about five an hour, as in the previous cases. It struck me as curious that on the following day this wasp seemed by no means so sure of her way, but over and over again went to the closed window. Again, September 21, at 11.50 I fed a wasp. 11.56 she returned to honey; 11.57 flew away 2 12. 6 ie i 12.6; ee 1.25 is i" 1:27. ae 1.37 - is 1-39; ee 1.57 “ f 2° 2.15 a B oe 2.22 if 2.25 -, 2.32 * a 236. 2.50 4 z 255 4, 3. 2 99 “ 3.4 99 3.14 . - 3.18) oe 3.28 ” ” 3.30 9 3.40 e - 34402 3.51 39 99 3.55 ” 4. 4 39 ” 4. 8 +) A DAYS WORK. 385 ? she returned to honey ; 4.31 flew away. 4.37 ¥ iy sai CO, 4.46 . us 448 4.57 m +s 5S0 ys 5. 9 g “ 52 5.22 e bs 5.26 4, 5.31 : 5 56 v5; She made therefore twenty-three journeys, but did not bring a single friend. The last case of which I will give particulars is the following, which has been already alluded to on p- 321. When I went to my sitting room at 4.13 a.M., I found her already there, though it was still almost dark. Her visits to the honey were as follows :— 4.13 A.M. returning at 4.32 99 99 39 4.50 ” 9 9 5. 5 +b) 99 9 5 15 > ” 9 5.22 4 » 9 5.29 +b) bh) 99 5.36 ” ” 29 5.43 5 » 5.50 ” 9° 99 5.57 +) +) 3° 6. 5 ” 9 b)) 6.14 9 ” ” 6 23 9 ” 9 6.30 +) 99 99 6.40 3 33 bb G:45.5 iss ” 9 6.56 9 99 ” WO, iss » ” 7.12 ,, a haw 7.18 ” 9 ” 7.25 55 ” 3 cc 386 A DAY’S WORK. 731 AM, “405 755 7.46 ” (fe; een 8. ” S10 ir., SS anes; Sone shyt) 8.360 9 ;, 8.40 ,, 8.45 ,, 8.56 ,, Ochs thas ye ees 9:20:7)5,: 9.26 -., 9:37 -s, 9.43 ,, o50mes Bae ee LOm A ans TOS05e.. 10.155" is, 10.24. «,, 10.29) =), LOS ieee, 10459 10:50= 45; 1059" DIG wes 11S) 3, 122 na, 11.302) 5 11:35" Fe, 14 es, 11.55 returning A DAY’S WORK. 12.14 P.M. returning at 12.22 3.37 3.45 3.55 4.46 4.56 ” ” 387 388 A DAY’S WORK 5. 3 P.M. returning at 5.14 ” ” 99 5.25 ” ” 5] 5.35 » ” 33 5.46 ” ” p) 5.50 ” ” 9 6. 5 ”° bb 33 6.12%, 7 <5 6.20 ” ” ”9 6.30 ,, ” ” 6.40 ,, 35 7. 6.46 ” ” ” 6.55 ” 9 ” tt ” ” 99 C17 ” ” ” 7.30 55 » On 7.36 +b ” 99 7.46 99 ” 99 This was her last visit for the evening, and she thus made no less than 116 visits in the day, during which time only three other wasps found the honey, though it was lying expused on a table at an open window. It will be seen that she worked with the utmost industry. No doubt, however, if a wasp is put to honey in an exposed place, other wasps gradually find their way to it. In the preceding experiments some few, though but few, did so. I then thought I would try a simi- lar experiment with concealed honey. Accordingly, on September 20, I marked a wasp and put her to some honey, which she visited assiduously. The following morning I opened my window at 6, and she made her first visit at 6.27, the temperature being 61° Fahr. I then placed the honey in a box commu- nicating with the outside by an india-rubber tube 6 inches long and 4 inch in diameter. The wasp, how- ever, soon got accustomed to it, and went in and out without much loss of time. The 22nd was finer; and A DAY’S WORK. 389 when I opened my window at 6 in the morning, she was already waiting outside, the temperature beiny 61°, The 23rd was rather colder, and she came first at 6.20, the temperature being again 61°, I was not at home during these days; but, as far as I could judge from watching in the mornings and evenings, no other wasp found the honey. On the 24th I had a holiday, and timed her as follows. It was rather colder than the preceding days, and she did not come till 6.40, when the temperature was 58° She returned as follows :— 6.49 8.19 6.58 8.26 Geke 8.35 7.22 8.45 7.32 8.52 7.40 9. 2 7.50 9.12 8. 0 9.45 8. 9 I had almost closed the window so that she hada difficulty in finding her way. 9.58 10.32 10.10 10.51 The temperature was still only 60°, and it was rain- ing, scarcely any other wasps about. Ile 1.21 11.11 1.32 11.21 1.42 11.29 1.53 11.40 2. 0 11.46 2.11 11.56 2.26 1256 2.35 12.14 2.51 12.25 2.59 12.33 3. 8 890 DESCRIPTION OF 3.14 4.39 3.23 4.47 3.32 4.58 3.40 5. 6 3.48 EIT, 3.57 5.28 4.12 5.35 4.20 5.42 4.29 5.52 This was her last visit. During the whole day no other wasp found the honey. I also tried other wasps, concealing the honey in the same manner, and with a similar result. I have no doubt some wasps would make even more journeys in a day than those recorded above. The following are descriptions of some new species referred to in the preceding pages. The first is the Australian honey ant. CAMPONOTUS INFLATUS, n. sp.! -Operaria.—Long. 15 mill. Nigra, tarsis pallidioribus; subtiliter cori- acea, setis cinereo-testaceis sparsis ; antennis tibiisque haud pilosis ; tarsis infra hirsutis ; mandibulis punctatis, hirsutis, sexdentatis; clypeo non carinato, antice in- tegro ; petioli squama modice incrassata, antice con- vexa, postice plana emarginata. Hab. Australian. The colour is black, the feet being somewhat paler. The body is sparsely covered with stiff cinereo-testa- ceous hairs, especially on the lower and anterior part of the head, the mandibles, and the posterior edge of the thorax. The head and thorax are finely coriaceous. The antenne are of moderate length, twelve- jointed; the scape about one-third as long as the terminal portion, and somewhat bent. At the apex of 1 In the Linnean Journ.v. Ihave given figures of this species, THE AUSTRALIAN HONEY ANT. 391 the scape are a few short spines, bifurcated at the point. At the apex of each of the succeeding segments are a few much less conspicuous spines, which decrease in size from the basal segments outwards. The antenna is also thickly clothed with short hairs, and especially towards the apex with leaf-shaped sense-hairs. The clypeus is rounded, with a slightly developed median lobe and a row of stiff hairs round the anterior border ; it is not carinated. The mandibles have six teeth, those on one side being rather more developed and more pointed than those on the other. They decrease pretty regularly from the outside inwards. The maxille are formed on the usual type. The maxillary palpi are six-jointed, the third segment being but slightly longer than the second, fourth, or fifth ; while in Myrmecocystus the third and fourth are greatly elongated. The segments of the palpi have on the inner side a number of curious curved blunt hairs besides the usual shorter ones. The labial palpi are four-jointed. The eyes are elliptical and of moderate size. The ocelli are not developed. The thorax is arched, broadest in front, without any marked incision between the meso- and meta-notum ; the mesonotum itself is, when seen from above, very broadly oval, almost circular, rather broader in front and somewhat flattened behind. The legs are of moderate length, the hinder ones somewhat the longest. The scale or knot is heart-shaped, flat behind, slightly arched in front, and with a few stiff, slightly diverging hairs at the upper angles. The length is about two-thirds of an inch. The following refers to a new species of mite which I have found in nests of Lasius flavus, and of which Mr. Michael has been good enough to draw up the following description. 392: DESCRIPTION OF A MITE UROPODA FORMICARIA, sp. nov. This species, although it falls strictly within the genus Uropoda, and not within Kramer’s genus Trachynotus as defined by that writer, still in most respects, except the very distinctions upon which the genus is founded, resembles T'rachynotus pyriformis (Kramer) more closely than it does any other recorded species. It is, however, decidedly different, and is characterised by the squareness of its abdomen, the thickness and roughness of its chitinous dermal skele- ton, and especially by the powerful chitinous ridges or wing-like expansions on the lateral surface between the second and third pair of legs. Length, g and ?, about -95 millim. Breadth 99 99 55 33 The abdomen is almost square, but somewhat longer than broad, and slightly narrowed at its junction with the cephalothorax, from which it is not plainly dis- tinguished. The extreme edge is a strong chitinous ridge bordered with a thick fringe of short, stout, curved hairs, as in 7. pyriformis. The dorsal surface of the cephalothorax is also narrowed towards the front, and has a curved anterior margin bent down so as to protect the mouth, as in that species; it bears a few of the same kind of hairs as the abdomen, and has a chitinous thickening at each side. The abdomen rises almost perpendicularly from the marginal ridge. There is a central depression occupying the posterior half, or rather more than half of the abdomen; and at the bottom of this depression are transverse ridges, the hinder ones nearly straight, and the anterior ones bent in the middle, the central point being forward ; at the sides of, but not in, this depression, are two chitinous blocks which seem to form a starting-point for the ridges Anterior to this depression the central portion of the PARASITIC ON ANTS. 393 creature, 1.e. its longitudinal dorsal axis, is higher in level than in parts nearer the margin, and forms an irregular triangle of rough chitine. A broad chitinous plate or ridge projects on each side above the second leg, and between that and the third, evidently for their protection; it is probably flexible at the will of the creature, as in the genus Oribates. The sternal surface has strongly marked depressions for the reception of the legs. The coxe of the first pair of legs are largely developed, flattened, almost touch in the median line, and nearly conceal the mouth, as in the typical Uropodas The genital opening of the male is rather large, round, and placed centrally between the coxew of the second pair of legs. The female appears only to be distinguished from the male by being more strongly chitinised, and by the con- spicuous valval plate which occupies the whole space between the coxz of the second and third pairs of legs and extends beyond both. The nymph is less square in the abdomen than the adult, and the border of hairs is absent; the margin is somewhat undulated, the concave undulations being so placed as to give free action to the legs when raised, the central depression of the abdomen is far less marked than in the adult; a slight ridge runs all round the dorsal surface a little within the margin; four ridges, two anterior and two posterior, run from the cireumscribing ridge to a raised ellipse in the centre ; there are not any plates for the protection of the legs, and the coxe of the first pair are not flattened as in the adult. This mite lives in the nests of Formica flava. 394 DESCRIPTION OF TWO NEW Description of a New Genus and Species of Phorides parasitic on Ants. By G. H. VERRALL, Esq., Memb. Entom. Soe. Str Jonn Lussock has kindly forwarded for my exa- mination and determination certain specimens of dip- terous insects said to have been found parasitic on species of ants, which latter he has been studying with care as to their habits. Having given considerable attention to the family Phoride, I was agreeably surprised to find the parasitic specimens to be forms new to science. One of these is a new species of the genus Phora; the other I regard as possessing characters sui generis, and hence define it under the generic title Platyphora, at the same time bestowing on the species the name of the discoverer, who worthily pursues entomological re- searches, spite of many pressing public engagements. The subjoined descriptions embrace the diagnostic peculiarities of the insects in question. PHORA FORMICARUM, n. sp.—Nigro-cinerea, fronte setosa, caniculata ; antennis mediocribus, cinereis; pal pis magnis, flavis; halteribus flavidis ; pedibus totis pallide flavis, inermibus, tibiis intermediis unicalcaratis, posticis modice dilatatis; alis subhyalinis, nervo secundo sim- plici, nervulis vix undulatis. Long. vix 4 lin. Frons broad, grey, bristly, two large bristles being close to the eye-margin ; down the centre is a deep impressed channel, which at its lower end joins a channel above the antenne, and at its upper end a channel round the raised vertical triangle ; the space between these two latter channels (comprising the true frons) is about once and a half broader than deep ; on the vertical triangle are two bristles; the third joint of the antenne is moderately large, ovate, grey ; the arista short, somewhat yellowish, almost naked ; the palpi conspicuous, all pale yellow, with a few short FLIES PARASITIC ON ANTS, 395 black bristles at the tip; on the cheeks are some short black bristles. The thorax is grey or brownish grey, broad, not much arched, the disk being nearly flat, and on the hinder part absolutely concave ; on the disk there are no long bristles, but a dense clothing of rather short black bristles; along the side of the thorax between the humeri, the base of the wing, and the scutellum are some long black bristles, and two on the thorax just before the scutellum; on each side of the scutellum are two long bristles; halteres dirty pale yellow; abdomen bare, dull black, with slightly yellowish incisures; ovipositor polished black, long, slightly incurved and grooved. Legs pale yellow, including the cox, clothed with minute black bristles; all the coxz with two or three black bristles at the tips, the legs otherwise bare excepting the spurs; femora flattened and widened, especially the hind pair, the hind tibiz also slightly flattened and widened on the apical half; middle tibiz with a long spur inside at the tip, and hind tibiew with a small one inside and a very minute one outside ; tarsi longer than the tibiz, joints gradually diminishing in length. Wings very slightly smoky, broad; second thick vein not extending half the length of the wing, thick- ened, but not forked at its tip; first veinlet with a steady curve; second very slightly curved at base, otherwise straight; third very slightly undulated; fourth hardly visible at base, evident towards tip, very slightly undulated; costa bristly up to end of second thick vein. This species is readily distinguished by its simple second thick vein, channelled frons, small size, and by the absence of bristles on the tibia. It is parasitic on Lasius niger. 396 PLATYPHORA LUBBOCKII. PLATYPHORA, n. gen. Lata, planx, tota absque.setis. Frons latissima. Thorax transversus. Abdomen parvus. Alarum vena eubitalis simplex, subacostali parallela; venule undu- latze ; costa ad basin subciliata. Distinguished from all the existing genera of Phoride by its flat and broad shape, which resembles that of the small species of Spherocera. The absence of strong bristles on the frons, thorax, and legs also distinguishes it from all the genera except Gymnophora, which, however, is of the usual arched Phora-shape, and has the cubital vein forked, costa bare, &e. PuatyPHorA Lussocku.—Nigra, nitida; abdomine triangulari, segmento tertio parvo; femoribus posticis basi flavidis; alis apice latis, flavido-hyalinis, costa ad basin subciliata, vena cubitali ad medium cost extensa subcostali parallela, venulis undulatis. Long. ? lin. Broad, flat, shining; frons very broad, the eyes scarcely occupying each one-sixth the width of the head; it is moderately shining, gently arched, and pretty densely clothed with minute bristles; the three ocelli visible slightly luteous ; antennz with the third joint rather large, somewhat rounded; thorax broad, flat, rather broader than the head, angles tolerably rounded, disk shining (in appearance sug- gesting a small Spherocera), beset with very minute bristles, which become rather scarcer towards the hinder part; scutellum rather dull, margined, nearly four times as broad as long: abdomen black, narrower and shorter than the thorax (again suggestive of Spheerocera); each segment after the second success- ively narrower, the last one being almost trian- gular; the third segment is very short, contracted under the second; the hind margins form a curved convex towards the thorax, the first segment being PLATYPHORA LUBBOCKII. 397 slightiy emarginate in the middle; the sixth (last) is much the longest. Legs stoutish, blackish, basal two- thirds of hind femora yellowish; middle tibize with two small spines at the tip. Wings considerably over- lapping the abdomen, yellowish hyaline, darker about the basal half of the costa, blunt at the tip, cubital vein extending about half the length of the wing, and the costa slightly ciliate up to its end, subcostal vein running parallel to it and ending just before it; both veins a little thickened at their ends; first veinlet curved S-like, considerably at its base, slightly at its end, vanishing distinctly before the tip of the wing; second veinlet also S-like, diverging at its end from the first, and ending distinctly below the tip of the wing; third veiniet slightly undulated, ending very wide from the second; fourth faint, not reaching the end of the wing. This description having been made from a specimen gummed down on card, though in very good condi- tion, 1 am unable to decide on the sex, or to examine the face, palpi, base of antenne, or coxe. 398 [Zetracted from the LINNHAN SocteTy’s JoURNAL—‘ ZOOLOGY,’ vol, XX. 1887.] APPENDIX G. Observations on Ants, Bees, and Wasps.—Part XI. By Sir Joun Lussock, Bart., M.P., D.C.L., LL.D., F.RB.S. [Read December 1, 1887.] On THE RELATION BETWEEN Formica sanguinea AND ITs SLAVES. It is well known that Polyergus rufescens is entirely dependent on its slaves. Huber long ago found that this ant will starve in the midst of plenty, and will not even put food into its own mouth. I have shown that isolated specimens will live for months if they are allowed a slave for an hour or so every two or three days to clean and feed them. It is said, on the contrary, that our only slave-making species, Formica sanguinea, can manage without slaves. Indeed, it appears that nests are sometimes found in which there are mistresses alone, entirely without slaves. Forel thinks that he has observed in such nests generally a larger proportion of small individuals than in nests which possess slaves. This would be interesting as tending to show that in such nests the young are less well nourished than when they have slaves to attend upon them. The question remains, of what advantage are the slaves to the F. sanguinea? Forel says, I do not quite understand why, ‘ Je ne veux pas trop rechercher ANTS AND THEIR SLAVES. 899 le motif qui pousse les sanguinea a se faire presque toujours des esclaves.’ ‘ Peut-étre,’ he adds, ‘le senti- ment de leur force, et le désir de travailler moins, pour faire plus a leur aise la chasse aux Lasius flavus et L. niger, est-il le mobile qui les pousse 4 cet acte. Celui-ci leur serait peu & peu devenu plus ou moins instinctif puisqu’il était avantageux 4 la conservation de leur espéce.’ This suggestion seems very probable, and may be partially correct; it is not, however, I think, a complete explanation. I have had under observation several nests of F. sanguinea. One of them I owe to the kindness of M. Forel himself, who sent it to me in June 1882. There was no queen, and, though the nest was very healthy, of course the numbers gradually diminished. At the beginning of January 1886 the last slave died, and there then re- mained only about fifty F. sanguinea. Under these circumstances the F. sanguinea began to die off rapidly; by the middle of the year only six re- mained alive, and these, no doubt, would not have survived long. On July 1,I got some pupe of F. fusca and placed them outside the nest. The sangut- meas soon discovered them, carried them into the nest, and from that day until December 1887, more than six months, there was only one other death. [Two of the F. sanguinea are still (August 1888) alive.] Although then it may be true, as to which I express no opinion, that there are nests of F’. sanguinea without slaves, still this observation seems to indicate that the slaves perform some important function in the economy of the nest. It still remains to be determined in what exactly this function consists. AntT-GUESTS. ' Dr. Wasmann has recently published! an interest- ing memoir on certain of these ‘ Ant-guests.’ His 1 Deutsche Entom. Zeitschrift, 1886, p. 49. 400 ANT-GUESTS. observations relate exclusively to some of the beetles which live with ants. He confirms V. Hagen’s statement that the speci- mens of Atemeles emarginatus which live with Myr- mica levinodis, a yellow ant, are paler in colour than those which share the nests of the black Formica fusca. He entirely confirms the statements of previous observers that the Atemeles is actually fed by the ants, who also clean them just as they do their own fellows. The Atemeles also, on their part, perform the same kind offices for the ants. He also repeatedly saw the ants licking the bunches of golden hairs on the abdomen of the Atemeles. The Atemeles has adopted very closely the habits of the ants with which it lives. They pair, moreover, in the nests of the ants. Still, they are not entirely dependent on their hosts, like some of the other ant- guests, but are able to feed themselves. Indeed the Myrmicas seem to drive them out of the nest towards the beginning of May. Dr. Wasmann is disposed to attribute this to the anxiety of the ants for their young. In Myrmica the pupe are naked, and he thinks the ants are afraid that the Atemeles would be unable to resist the temptation of eating them. In support of this suggestion, he observes that in the nests of Formica sanguinea, whose pupe spin a silken cocoon and are therefore protected, he has found Atemeles as late as the end of June. He has not been able to satisfy himself whether the larvee of Atemeles are brought up in the ants’ nest or not; but inasmuch as while the Atemeles are far from rare, he has only found among them a single larva which could belong to the species, and even this was not certainly identified, it seems probable that the larval stage is passed elsewhere. Lomechusa strumosa has been recorded from the nests of Formica sanguinea, Myrmica rubra, Formica ANT-GUESTS, 401 congerens, and F. rufa; but Dr. Wasmann, like V. Hagen and Forel, has never found it except with F. sanguinea. It is fed by the ants in the same manner as Atemeles, and has very similar bundles of golden hairs on the abdomen, which are licked by the ants like those of Atemeles. While, however, the ants seem to communicate with the Atemeles mainly by means of the antenna, in the case of Lomechusa the parts of the mouth are brought more into play. He has found Lomechusa in the ants’ nests up to the end of June. Dinarda dentata is a still more frequent inmate in the nests of F. sanguinea, but plays a very different part. The ants seem indifferent to them, and when they take any notice it is of an unfriendly character. Nor can this be wondered at, for according to M. Wasmann the principal food of the Dimurdas consists of any ant which may chance to die, or any other weak insect which falls in their way. The ants seem thoroughly to distrust them, and it is curious that they should be tolerated. Grimm, indeed, thought he had seen ants licking the Dinardas, as they do Atemeles and Lomechusa. Wasmann, however, considers that this was a mistake; at any rate he has never seen anything of the kind. If an ant meets a Dinardu she either treats it with indifference or threatens the beetle with her jaws, and the Dinarda then raises its abdo- men, which appears always to drive away the ant. It is possible that the Dinarda has the power of pro- ducing an odour distressing to the ants, or perhaps they eject poison like the Formicas themselves. They seem always to remain in the nests of the ants, and pass through their transformation in them. Formica sanguinea, like F. rufa and F. congerens, changes its nest periodically twice a year; such, at least, is said to be the case on the continent ; I am not aware whether the same habit has been observed in this country. The summer nests are looser and opener, the winter ones DD 402 MIMICRY. lower and more compressed. In their migration from one nest to the other, which are occasionally at some distance apart, the ants are accompanied by the Dinardas. On one occasion, when the ants were flitting, Dr. Wasmann in twenty minutes captured among them thirteen specimens of Dinarda; while under other circumstances he never saw one outside the nest. Heterius ferrugineus, belonging to a totally dif- ferent family of beetles, the Histeride, and which inhabits the nests of Polyergus rufescens, Formica sanguinea, F. pressilabris, F. fusca, F. rufibarbis, F. rufa, F. exsecta, Lasius niger, and Tapinoma erraticum, appears to agree in its habits with Dinarda, and to devour dead and wounded ants, as also do the Myrmedonie. Dr. Wasmann confirms entirely my observations, in opposition to the statements of Lespés, that while ants are deadly enemies to those of other nests, even of the same species, the domestic animals, on the contrary, may be transferred from one nest to another and are not attacked. He justly observes that, no doubt, many interest- ing discoveries are in store for us as to the relations between ants and their guests. The marvellous and grotesque antenne of the Pausside will doubtless, one of these days, tell a wonderful story to some patient and fortunate observer. Mimicry amone ANTS. Professor C. Emery has published in the £ Bull. della Soc. Ent. Italiana,’ 1886, a short, but interesting note on the habits of Camponotus lateralis. Of this species there are two varieties: one black, like its nearest allies; the other red, with the abdomen and part of the thorax black. They live in small colonies, GOLOUR-SENSE OF ANTS. 403 and make expeditions up trees to collect honey-dew from the Aphides. The black type (C. foveolatus, Mayr; C. ebeninus, Emery) sometimes goes in troops, but generally a few join the troops of other black ants, such as Formica gagates and Camponotus ethiops. Professor Emery suggests that, their numbers being small and their sight not very good, they find it convenient to accompany other ants which live in larger communities, and that they perhaps escape detection from the similarity of colour. This suggestion derives some support from the fact that the red variety accompanies in a similar manner the troops of Cremastogaster scutellaris, which is red and black, and at first sight curiously like the red variety of C. lateralis. Cremastogaster scwtellaris lives in immense communities among the pine woods aloug the shores of the Mediterranean, and is, as I know to my cost, a very pugnacious species. Professor Emery suggests that the black form of C. lateralis is the original type, resembling as it does its nearest congeners ; and that the red variety has the advantage, from its similarity to Cremastogaster scutellaris, of using that species as its guide, and of sharing, un- detected, in the produce of its flocks and herds. Pro- fessor Emery observes that he only suggests this explanation. The facts he mentions are very interest- ing, and it is to be hoped that he will continue his observations. On THE COLOUR-SENSE OF ANTS. Professor Graber! has published an interesting memoir on this subject. He confirms the observations on ants and Daphnias, in which I showed that they are 1 ¢Fundamental-Versuche tiber die Helligkeits- und Farben- Emp‘ndlichkeit augenloser und geblendeter Thiere,’ Sitz. Kxis Akad. der Wiss., Wien, 1883. DD 2 404 COLOUR-SENSE OF ANTS. sensitive to the ultra-violet rays, by similar observa- tions on earthworms, newts, &c. It is interesting, moreover, that the species examined by him showed themselves, like the ants, especially sensitive to the blue, violet, and ultra-violet rays. Professor Graber, however, states that he differs from me, inasmuch as I attributed the sensitiveness to the ultra-violet rays exclusively to vision ; that it is ‘ausschliesslich durch die Augen vermittelt.? I would not, however, express that opinion as applying absolutely to all animals, though it is, I believe, true of ants, where the opacity of the chitine renders it unlikely that the light would be perceived except by the medium of the eyes and ocelli. Graber has demonstrated in earthworms and newts, and Plateau in certain Myriapods,! that these animals perceive the difference between light and darkness by the general surface of the skin. But, more than this, Graber appears to have demonstrated that earthworms and newts distinguish not only between light of different intensities, but also between rays of ditferent wave- lengths, preferring red to blue or green, and green to blue. He found, moreover, as I did, that they are sensitive to the ultra-violet rays. Earthworms, of course, have no eyes ; but thinking that the light might perhaps act directly on the cephalic ganglia, Graber decapitated a certain number, and found that the light still acted on them in the same manner, though the differences were not so marked. He also covered over the eyes of newts, and found that the same held good with them. Hence he concludes that the general surface of the skin is sensitive to light. These results are certainly curious and interesting ; but, even if we admit the absolute correctness of his deductions, I do not see that they are in opposition to those at which I had arrived. My main conclusions 1 Jowrn. de U Anatomie et de la Physiologie, 1886, p. 431. ON THE SENSITIVENESS OF THE SKIN TO LIGHT, 405 were that ants, Daphnias, &c., were able to perceive light of different wave-lengths, and that their eyes were sensitive to the ultra-violet rays much beyond our limits of vision. His observations do not in any way controvert these deductions : indeed the argument by which (p. 234) he endeavours to prove that the effect is due to true light and not to warmth, pre- supposes that sensations which can be felt by the general surface of the skin are still more vividly perceived by the special organs of vision. Professor Graber’s observations have been followed up by M. Forel.! He took fifteen specimens of Camp- onotus ligniperdus, which is a large species, and, moreover, possesses the advantage, for this purpose, of having no ocelli, and carefully covered the eyes with opaque varnish. He then placed them in a box with ten normal specimens of the same species (to which he subsequently added five more), and covered over one half of the box with cardboard and the other half with a layer of water. In this way the one half of the box was darker than the other, but the tempera- ture of the two sides was approximately equal. In four experiments the numbers were as follows :— UNDER THE CARDBOARD. UNDER THE WATER. Hoodwinked Normal Hoodwinked Normal Ants. Ants. Ants, Ants, 3 9 12 i 13 a 3 3 9 9 5 1 3 8 12 2 28 30 32 7 It will be seen that a very large majority of the normal ants in every case went under the cardboard ; while it was practically indifferent to the hoodwinked 1 Reo. Zoul, Suisse, 1887. 406 ON THE SENSITIVENESS OF THE SKIN TO LIGHT. ants in which side of the box they rested. Moreover, every time the water and the cardboard were trans- posed, the normal ants were much excited and began running about to avoid the light, while the hoodwinked ants were quite unaffected. These experiences, therefore, proved that the varnish did, in fact, render the ants temporarily blind, their instincts being in other respects unaffected. He then replaced the cardboard and water by a solution of esculine, which is impervious to the ultra- violet rays, and a glass of deep cobalt, which stopped most of the other rays but permitted the ultra-violet to pass. The results then were :— UNDER THE ESOULINE. UNDER THE COBALT GLASS. Hoodwinked Normal Hoodwinked Normal Ants. Ants, Ants. Ants. 1p 8 3 1 1a 5) 4 2 9 12 5 3 5 13 9 2 10 12 a 3 3 1] 12 3 12 13 3 1 61 82 40 15 Thus, then, a very large proportion of the normal ants preferred to avoid the ultra-violet rays by going under the esculine. To the varnished ants, on the contrary, it was indifferent whether they were under the esculine or the cobalt. The slight preponderance in favour of the esculine was probably partly due to having started the experiments with a larger number of ants in the side of the box then covered with esculine, and partly from the fact that the hoodwinked ants would have a tendency to accompany the others. From these and other experiments M. Forel comes to the same conclusion as I did, that the ants perceive ON FUNCTION OF COMPOUND EYES AND OCELLI. 407 the ultra-violet rays with their eyes; and not, as suggested by Graber, by the skin generally. EXPERIMENTS witH Platyarthrus. Tn connection with this subject I may add that I do not at all doubt the sensitiveness to light of eyeless animals. In experimenting on this subject I have always found that though the Platyarthrus, which live with the ants, have no eyes, yet if part of the nest be uncovered and part kept dark, they soon find their way into the shaded part. It is, however, easy to imagine that in unpigmented animals, whose skins are more or less semi-transparent, the light might act directly on the nervous system, even though it could not produce anything which could be called vision. On THE FuNCTION oF THE ComPpouND EyrEs AND OCELLI. Forel agrees with Réaumur, Marcel de Serres, and Dugés, that in insects which possess both ocelli and compound eyes the ocelli may be covered over without materially affecting the movements of the animals; while, on the contrary, if the compound eyes are so treated, they behave just as in the dark. For instance, Forel varnished over the compound eyes of some flies (Calliphora vomitoria and Lucilia cesar), and found that if placed on the ground they made no attempt to rise, while if thrown in the air they flew first in one direction and then in another, striking against any object that came in their way, and being apparently quite unable to guide themselves, They flew re- peatedly against a wall, falling to the ground, and unable to alight against it, as they do so cleverly when they have their eyes to guide them. Finally, they ended in flying away straight up into the air and quite out of sight. Johannes Muller inclined to the opinion that in- 408 ON FUNCTION OF COMPOUND EYES AND OCELLI. sects saw near objects with their ocelli. Plateau satis- fied himself that the movements of insects are not affected by the ocelli being covered over, and hence concluded that they are rudimentary organs. The complexity of their structure, however, seems fatal to this conclusion. Forel confesses that the use of the ocelli still re- mains an enigma, but he is disposed to think that they enable their possessors to see in comparative darkness. He observes! that they are specially developed in in- sects which require to see both in bright light and also in comparative obscurity. Aérial insects do not gene- rally require or possess ocelli. Lebert expresses the opinion ? that in spiders some of their eight eyes—those which are most convex and brightly coloured—serve to see during daylight ; the others, flatter and colourless, during the dusk. Pavesi has observed’ that while the species of Nesticus possess normally eight eyes, in a cave-dwelling species (Nesti- cus speluncarum) there are four only, the four middle eyes being atrophied. This suggests that the four central eyes serve specially in daylight. SENSE OF SMELL, In my previous memoirs I have recorded a few experiments which convinced me that ants are gifted with a very highly developed sense of smell, and that this resides in the antenne. Forel, Graber, Lefebvre, Perris, and other recent writers have come to the same conclusion, and there can, I think, be no reasonable doubt that in very many insects the antennz serve as organs of smell. At the same time it does not neces- sarily follow that the sense of smell should be confined 1 ZT. o. p. 181. 2 Die Spinnen der Schweiz, p. 6. ® ‘Sopra una nuova specie di Ragni appartenente alle collezioni del Museo Civico di Genova,’ Ann. Mus, Cie. 1873, p. 344, ON THE SENSE OF SMELL. 409 to them. Even in ourselves it is not always easy to distinguish the sense of taste from that of smell. Graber deprived a beetle (Silpha thoracica) of its antenna, and then tested it with oil of rosemary and asafcetida. A beetle of the same species, but with an- tennz, showed its perception by movement in half a second to one second in the case of the oil of rosemary, and rather longer, one second to two seconds, in the case of the asafetida. The Silpha without antennze showed its perception of the oil of rosemary in three seconds on an average of eleven times, while in no case did it show any indication of perceiving the asafcetida even in sixty seconds. Professor Graber infers, ‘dass der eine Geruchsstoff (Assa-foet), der nichts weniger als ein sehr feiner ist, nur durch das Medium der Fuhler perzipiert Bewegun- gen auslost, wihrend der andere (Rosmarin6l) ahnliches auch ohne Vermittlung dieser angeblich spezifischen Geruchsorgane bewirkt.’ Graber questions some of the experiments which seemed te me to demonstrate the existence of a sense of smell in ants. He says:— ‘Da Lubbock noch hinzufiigt, dass keiner, der das Benehmen der Ameisen unter diesen Umstinden beo- bachten wiirde, den geringsten Zweifel an ihrem Ge- ruchsvermégen haben kénnte, wihlte ich auch diese Methode, um zu erforschen, wie sich etwa der Fuhler beraubte Ameisen verhalten wiirden. Ich war nicht wenig tiberrascht zu finden, dass auch diese (es handelt sich um Formica rufa) vor dem Riechobjekt umkehr- ten. Um ganz sicher zu gehen, versuchte ich’s aber noch mit dem gleichen Arrangement aber mit Weglas- sung des Riech-Stoffes, und siehe da! sie kehrten auch jetzt noch um! Bei genauerer Beobachtung der von einer Ameise vom Anfang an auf dem Papiersteg zu- riickgelegten Strecke stellte sich auch bald heraus, dass es sich bei dem gewissen Umkehren lediglich um 410 ON THE SUPPOSED SENSE OF DIRECTION. ein versuchsweises Abschrieten oder Ausprobiren des unbekannten Weges handelt, oder das sich die Ameisen aihnlich benehmen wie wir selbst, wenn wir etwa auf einem schwanken Brette eine tiefe Gebirgskluft tiber- schreiten sollen.’! M. Graber’s observation is, I doubt not, quite cor- rect, but his inference is not well founded, nor was his experiment the same as mine. It is quite true that if an ant be started off along a narrow paper bridge, she will after awhile turn round and come back again. I do not, however, think that this is due, as he suggests, to any sense of giddiness. Ants which habitually climb trees are not likely to be affected by any such sensation. It is rather, I believe, that they feel they are being sent on a fool’s errand. Why should they start off and run straight forward into a strange country? They turn round in hopes of finding their way home, whether the bridge is high or low, broad or narrow, or indeed whether they are on any bridge at all. M. Graber has not observed that I expressly stated that in each case they stopped exactly when they came to the scented pencil. SENSE OF DIRECTION. Fabre has made a number of experiments from which he concludes that Bees have a certain sense of direction. My own experiments led me to a different opinion. I have now repeated some of them, and made others on ants, which all led to the same conclusion. For in- stance, I put down some honey on a piece of glass, close to a nest of Lasiws niger, and when the ants were feeding I placed it quietly on the middle of a board 1 foot square and 18 inches from the nest. I did this with 13 ants, and marked the points at which they left 1 VY. Graber, ‘ Vergl. Grundversuche tiber die Wirk. und d. Auf- nahmestellen chem. Reize bei den Thieren,’ iol. Centralblatt, vol. xiii, p. 449 (1885-6). RECOGNITION OF FRIENDS. 411 the board. Five of them did so on the half of the board nearest to the nest, and eight on that turned away from it; I then timed three of them. They all found the nest eventually, but it took them ten, twelve, and twenty minutes respectively. Again, I took forty ants which were feeding on some honey, and put them down on a gravel path about 50 yards from the nest, and in the middle of a square 18 inches in diameter, which I marked out on the path by straws. They wandered about with every appearance of having lost themselves, and crossed the boundary in all directions. I marked down where they left the square, and then took them near the nest, which they joyfully entered. Two of them, however, we watched for an hour. They meandered about, and at the end of the time one was about 2 feet from where she started, but scarcely any nearer home; the other about 6 feet away, and nearly as much further from home. I prepared a corresponding square on paper, and, having indicated by the arrow the direction of the nest, I marked down the spot where each ant passed the boundary. They crossed it in all directions; and if the square were divided into two halves, one towards the nest and one away from it, the number in each was almost exactly the same. RECOGNITION OF FRIENDS. In the interesting memoir already cited Forel says :—‘ Lubbock (l. c.) a cru démontrer que les four- mis enlevées de leur nid 4 l’état de nymphe et écloses hors de chez elles étaient néanmoins reconnues par leurs compagnes lorsqu’on les leur rendait. Dans mes “ Fourmis de la Suisse ” j’avais cru démontrer le con- traire. Voici une expérience que j’ai faite ces jours-ci: le 7 aout, je donne des nymphes de Formica pratensis prés d’éclore 4 quelques Formica sanguinea dans une 412 RECOGNITION OF FRIENDS. boite. Le 9 aoit quelques-unes éclosent. Le 11 aoidt, au matin, je prends l’une des jeunes pratensis agée de deux ou trois jours seulement et je la porte 4 la four- miliére natale dont elle était sortie comme nymphe seulement 4 jours auparavant. Elle y est fort mal regue. Ses nourrices dil y a 4 jours l’empoignent, qui par la téte, qui par le thorax, qui par les pattes en recourbant leur abdomen d’un air menacant. Deux d’entre elles la tinrent longtemps en sens inverse, chacune par une patte en l’écartelant. Enfin cependant on finit par la tolérer, comme on le fait aussi pour de si jeunes fourmis (encore blanc jaunatre) provenant de fourmiliéres différentes. J’attends encore deux jours pour laisser durcir un peu mes nouvelles écloses. Puis jen reporte deux sur leur nid. Elles sont violemment attaquées. L’une d’elles est inondée de venin, tiraillée et tuée. L’autre est longtemps tiraillée et mordue, mais finalement laissée tranquille (tolérée?). On m’objectera Vodeur des sanguinea qui avait vécu 4 jours avec la premiére et 6 jours avec les deux der- niéres. A cela je répondrai simplement par l’expérience de la page 278 4 282 de mes “ Fourmis de la Suisse,” ot des F. pratensis adultes séparées depuis deux mois de leurs compagnes par une alliance forcée avec des F sanguinea, alliance que J ’avais provoquée, reconnurent immédiatement leurs anciennes compagnes et s’alliérent presque sans dispute avec elles. Je maintiens donc mon opinion: les fourmis apprennent 4 se connaitre petit 4 petit, 4 partir de leur éclosion. Je crois du reste que c’est au moyen de perceptions olfactives de contact.’! I have, however, repeated my previous observations with the same results. At the beginning of August I brought in a nest of ' Auguste Forel, ‘Expérience et Remarques critiques sur les Sensations des Insectes.’ Recueil Zool. Suisse, tome iv, (1887), pp. 179-180. RECOGNITION OF FRIENDS, 413 Lusius niger containing a large number of pupe. Some of these I placed by themselves in charge of three ants belonging to the same species, and taken from a nest which I have had under observation for rather more than ten years. On August 28, I took twelve of the young ants, which in the meantime had emerged from the separated pup, selecting some which had all but acquired their full colour, Four of them I replaced in their old nest, and four in that from which their nurses were taken. At 4.30. In their own nest none were attacked. In their nurses’ nest one was attacked. 5. In their own nest none were attacked. In their nurses’ nest all four were attacked. 8. In their own nest none were attacked. In their nurses’ nest three were attacked. The next day I took six more and marked them with a spot of paint as usual, and at 7.30 replaced them in their own nest. At8 I found 5 quite at home. The others I could not see, but none were attacked. 8.30 bb) 5 9 39 39 9 39 3 +b) 93 > 10 > 4 ” ” 99 1 l 39 5 ” +B) ” 1 2 ” 3 ” 39 3”) 1 ” 3 ” 39 ” 4 ” a: 9 ” 39 7 ”» 1 ” bb) +b 9 99 2 33 ” ” The next morning I could only see two, but none were being attacked and there were no dead ones. It is probable that the paint had been cleaned off the others, but it was not easy to find them all among so 414 THE PROBABLE MODE OF RECOGNITION. many. At any rate none were being attacked nor had any been killed. These observations, therefore, quite confirm those previously made, and seem to show that if pupz are taken from a nest, kept till they become perfect in- sects, and then replaced in the nest, they are recog- nised as friends. When we consider the immense number of ants in a nest, amounting in some cases to over 500,000, it is a most remarkable fact that they all know one another. If a stranger, even belonging to the same species, be placed among them, she will be at once attacked and driven out of the nest. Nay, more, I have already shown that they remember their friends even after more than a year’s separation, and that it is not by any sign or password, because even if rendered intoxicated, so as to be utterly insensible, they are still recognised. As regards the mode of recognition, Mr. McCook con- siders that it is by scent, and states that if ants are more or less soaked in water, they are no longer recog- nised by their friends, but are attacked. He mentions a case in which an ant fell accidentally into some water :— ‘She remained in the liquid some moments, and erept out of it. Immediately she was seized in a hos- tile manner, first by one, then by another, then by a third; the two antenne and one leg were thus held. A fourth one assaulted the middle thorax and petiole; the poor little bather was thus dragged helplessly to and fro for a long time, and was evidently ordained to death. Presently I took up the struggling heap. Two of the assailants kept their hold; one finally dropped, the other I could not tear loose, and so put the pair back upon the tree, leaving the doomed immersionist to her hard fate.’ His attention having been called to this, he noticed several other cases, always with the same result. I LONGEVITY OF ANTS. 415 have not myself been able to repeat the observation with the same species, but with two at least of our native ants the results were exactly reversed. In one case five specimens of Lasius niger fell into water and remained immersed for three hours. I then took them out and put them into a bottle to recover themselves. The following morning I allowed them to return. They were received as friends, and though we watched them from 7.30 till 1.30 every hour, there was not the slightest sign of hostility. The nest was moreover placed in a close box, so that if any ant were killed we could inevitably find the body, and I can therefore positively state that no ant died. In this case, there- fore, it is clear that the immersion did not prevent them from being recognised. Again, three specimens of Formica fusca dropped into water. After three hours I took them out, and after keeping them by themselves for the night to recover, I put them back into the nest. They were unquestionably received as friends, without the slightest sign of hostility, or even of doubt. I do not, however, by any means intend to express the opinion that smell is not the mode by which recognition is effected. LONGEVITY. It may be remembered that my nests have enabled me to keep ants under observation for long periods, and that I have identified workers of Lasiws niger and Formica fusca which were at least seven years old, and two queens of Formica fusca which have lived with me ever since December 1874. One of these queens, after ailing for some days, died on July 30, 1887. She must then have been more than thirteen years old. I was at first afraid that the other one might be affected by the death of her companion. She 416 ANTS AND SEEDS lived, however, until August 8, 1888, when she must have been nearly fifteen years old, and is, therefore, by far the oldest insect on record. Moreover, what is very extraordinary, she continued to lay fertile eggs. Fertilisation took place in 1874 at the latest. There has been no male in the nest since then, and, moreover, it is, I believe, well estab- lished that queen ants and queen bees are fertilised once for all. The continued fertility of this queen ant is therefore most remarkable, and very interesting from a physiological point of view. In some plants (Rues) the pollen-tube takes as long as two years to reach the ovule. Indeed the pollen has some claims to be regarded as a separate organism, for it certainly possesses the power of growth and of assimilating nourishment. There is not, however, so far as I am aware, any other case which can compare with this of my queen ant. Moreover the case is not altogether isolated. I had another queen of Formica fusca which lived to be thirteen years old, and I have now a queen of Lasius niger which is more than nine years old, and still lays fertile eggs which produce female ants. Ants AND SeEps or Melampyrum pratense. M. Lindstrom has recently called attention to the interesting fact that the seeds of this plant closely resemble pup of ants in size, shape, and colour, even to the black mark at one end. He has suggested, very ingeniously, that this may be an advantage to the plant by deceiving the ants, and thus inducing them to carry off and so disseminate the seeds. There seemed, how- ever, some improbability in the idea that ants should be deceived as to their own sisters. M. Liindstrom has found seeds of this species in ants’ nests, but has not OF MELAMPYRUM PRATENSE, 417 actually seen ants carrying them off, and I thought it would be worth while to determine this. Accordingly I took ten seeds and placed them just outside one of my domesticated nests of Lasius niger. A certain number of ants were outside, and I saw several come up to the seeds, but they took no notice of them. I left them lying there for two days. I then tried them with another nest, the roof of which con- sisted of two plates of glass, side by side, but with an interval between them. I placed the seeds in this interval, and uncovered one of the sides. The ants immediately began carrying the pup which were thus exposed to the light to the other (covered) part of the nest, in doing which they necessarily passed close to the seeds, but they did not take the slightest notice of them. This operation was finished by 11 a.M., and I left them undisturbed till 12, the seeds remaining un- noticed and untouched. I then moved the cover from one half of the nest to the other, and the ants imme- diately began transporting the pup to the shaded half. One or two of them examined the seeds, not one of which, however, was moved. This took about an hour. At 4 p.M., however, three of the seeds had been carried in, and the next day at 7 A.M. two more seeds had been carried in. I then removed them, and put them just outside one of my nests of F. fusca. August 31. 7 a.M. None have been touched. I now put the covering close to, but not over them. The ants took no notice of them. September 2. I now placed them just in the en- trance of the nest, and covered over a part just outside: the ants collected as usual under the cover. I then removed the cover just inside the nest, so that the ants to reach it had to pass among the seeds. They, however, came in, but did not move a single seed. I once again moved the cover outside, and they followed it as before, but without moving the seeds, EE 418 SPECIAL SENSES OF WASPS, So far as these observations go, it would seem that F. fusca takes no notice of these seeds, but that they really are under certain circumstances carried off by Lasius niger. Wasps. Mr. and Mrs. Peckham have published in the ‘Proceedings of the Natural History Society of Wis- consin’! a very interesting paper on the special senses of wasps, and their conclusions concur closely with mine. It appears from their observations that. some wasps stay out all night and return early in the morning, before the others begin coming out. For instance, on August 18, the first wasps left the nest at 7.25; ten, however, had already returned, three of them before 5 a.M. It appears from their observations that the average time a wasp is absent from the nest, that is, the average length of each excursion, is forty-three minutes. They observe that this may appear incon- sistent with my observations, when the trips were shorter and more numerous, one of my wasps having paid me 116 visits in fifteen hours and a half. But, as they justly observe, the cases are not comparable. My wasps and theirs were like Jacob and Ishmael—mine had everything ready prepared for them, theirs had to hunt for themselves. As regards the sense of hearing, they repeated some of my experiments with the same results. They seem to consider that as regards the sense of colour their conclusions are somewhat at variance with mine. As regards the supposed sense of direction they say ?:—‘Sir John Lubbock, in dealing with the sense 1 April 1887. 3 Proo, Nat. Hist. Soc. Wisconsin, April 1887, p. 113. SENSE OF DIRECTION IN WASPS, 419 of direction in ants, concluded, after a number of observations, that they were endowed with this sense in a high degree. Subsequently he discovered, quite accidentally, that the ants found their way by observ- ing the direction in which the light was falling.” My conclusion was, however, the result of many observa- tions carried on under varied conditions, and I should hardly call it an accident. They came to the conclusion, as I had done, that wasps have no sense of direction, that is to say in the form of a mysterious additional sense, but that, if they do not know where they are, they rise higher and higher into the air, circling as they do so, until they discover some high treetop or other object that had before served them as a landmark, and that in this way they are able to make their way home. This entirely tallies with my own conclusion. It is interest- ing as showing that the vision of wasps must be good for somewhat distant objects. They also found, as I had done, that their memory varied greatly in different individuals. Domestic Economy or ANTS. Lastly, I give two illustrations which will convey an idea of some of my ant-nests. Plate VI. represents about a quarter of one of my frames. The shaded part represents the earth, which will be seen to have been arranged by the ants intoa sort of circular fortification, or zereba, access to which is obtained by one or two tunnels, not visible in the illustration, and to which a pathway leads from the entrance. Plate VII. represents a nest of Lasius niger. It shows the entrance, vestibule, and two chambers, in the outer and larger one of which the ants have left some pillars, BEB 2 420 DOMESTIC ECONOMY OF ANTS. almost as if to support the roof. The queen is sur- rounded by workers, those in her immediate neighbour- hood all having their faces turned towards her. There is a group of pup, and several of larvee, sorted as usual according to ages. There are also a number of the blind woodlice ( Platyarthrus Hoj{fmanseggit), and of the small Beckia albinos, both of which habitually live in ants’ nests. HEARING IN BEES. 421 APPENDIX H. Hearing in Bees. THE following are the experiments referred to on p. 291 :— On September 30, 1882, I put out a small quantity of honey on my lawn, and brought some bees to it. I then set a musical box going, and continually replen- ished the honey and wound up the box. The weather was lovely, and all day a certain number of bees visited the honey. Then, on October 8, I removed the honey to an open window on the first floor, and set the musical box playing as usual by its side. I waited half an hour, but not a bee came. I need hardly say that the music was quite audible on the lawn. I then again put the musical box and the honey on the lawn, and the bees very soon again began work. After the lapse of an hour I brought the honey and musical box into the house, and placed them at an open drawing-room win- dow less than 15 yards from where they had stood on the lawn. The music was kept going for an hour, but not a bee came. The following day was again extremely fine. The bees came as usual to the honey. I let them feed till 10 a.M., when I removed the honey as before to the drawing-room. After the lapse of half an hour I set the box playing, and waited half an hour, but not a bee came. I then put the honey and musical box again out on 422 HEARING IN BEES, a chair on the lawn, 5 yards in front of the drawing- room window. The first bee found the honey in 5} minutes. I left it so for three-quarters of an hour, and then brought the honey and the musical box inte the house and put them just inside the window but out of sight. The box was kept playing for three-quarters of an hour, during the whole of which a few bees kept hovering round the chair; but not a single bee found the honey, or even was attracted by the music into the room. I then took the honey and put it again on the chair outside. In less than 5 minutes nine bees had settled on it. I then brought it back into the room, and put it, with the bees on it, where it had stood pre- viously. The bees fed, returned to the hive, and came back again to the honey as usual, showing that they had not the slightest objection to enter the house. I then took the honey and the musical box down to the hives. Immediately (7.e. about a yard) in front of my hives is a low wall; and I put the box and the honey on the far side of the wall, so that they were something less than 4 yards distant from the hive, but of course not directly visible. I then kept the music going for two hours, from 1.30 to 3.30 P.M., but not a bee came to the honey. From these experiments we are, I think, justified in concluding either that the bees did not hear the music, or that, though they had been feeding close to the music, eight days was not a long enough period to suggest to them that there could possibly be any connection between the honey and the musival box. To decide between these two alternatives, I moved the musical box (without setting it to play) and honey to another part of the lawn about 15 yards from the first, and put an equal quantity of honey on a similar piece of glass at about the same distance both from the musical box and from the spot where the box had pre- viously been. In half an hour there were severa] bees HEARING IN BEES. 423 at the honey on the musical box, and none at the other. After this we had a week of rain. The next fine morn- ing I again put out the musical box with some honey, and at a distance of about 15 yards a similar quantity of honey on a bit of glass on the grass. In half an hour there were several bees at the honey on the musical box, and none on the other. I had intended to repeat this several times for greater security, but was unfortunately prevented by bad weather. The observations, however, indicate, as far as they go, that the bees did connect the presence of the musical box with that of the honey, and were guided by it, even if it were not playing, so long as they could see it, but that if they could not see it, even though it were playing, it did not assist them. 1 5 - 4 J fi 7 + } INDEX. ABD BDOMEN of ant described, 10, 13; of the Mexican honey ant, 19, 48 Acacia with hollow thorns in- habited by ants, 58 Affection less powerful than hatred among ants, 106 ; absence of, among bees, 286 Agricultural ants, 61, 92 Aldrovandus quoted as to ants, 61 Amazon ants, see Polyergus 7u- Sescens Amber, an intermediate form of ant preserved in, 68 Analogies between ant societies and human, 91 André quoted as to Platyarthrus, 75; as to the slaves of F. san- guinea, 80 Anergates, 85; no workers among them, 86; degraded condition of, 89 Animal food, queens hatched in an artificial nest supplied with, 40 Angrecum sesquipedale, length of flowers of, 52 Anomma arcens, the Driver ant, described, 20, 63; their blind- ness, 65 Ants, three families of, 1; four pe- riods of life in, 6; duration of life among, 8, 38, 40, 415; structure APH of, 10; different classes of indi viduals among, 18; communities ot, 24; games of, 28; their rela- tion to plants, 50; often insecti- vorous, 59; their relations to other animals generally hostile, 63; their enemies, 26, 67 ; their domestic animals, 67-78, 399; progress among, 90 ; their beha- viour towards each other, 94, &e.; mental powers of, 181; their sense of vision, 11, 182- 220, 258; of smell, 127, 238; 258, 408; of hearing, 221, 226; stridulating apparatus among, 230; their intelligence, 236 ‘Ant eggs,’ 7 ‘ Ant-rice,’ 61 Antenna of ant described, 10, sense organ in terminal portion of, illustrated, 227 Antennz as means of communica- tion among ants, 153; as organs of hearing, 221, 226; of smell, 94, 234 Antirrhinum fertilised by humble bees, 54 Aphides made use of by ants, 25, 67 ; different species of, utilised by different ants, 68; their honey, 69; their eggs tended by ants, 70; not domesticated by F, fusca, 91 426 ARI Aristida oligantha, ‘ant-rice,’ 61 \ Artificial nests for ants, 3, 164 * 4temeles emarginatus, in ant nests, 400 Ateuchus pilularius, anecdote of, 154 Atrophy of the imaginal discs of the ant-workers, 12; of sting in Formica, 15; of eyes of Platyarthrus and Beckia, 75 Atta barbara, the eye in, 11; variety of workers among, 19 — structor, its treatment of col- lected grain, 61 — testaceo-pilosa, experiment as to power of communication, 177 Attachment among ants, 94 Auditory organs, structures in ant- antennz probably serve as, 226 Australian honey ant, 49; de- scribed, 390 ATES, Mr., quoted as to the five kinds of workers in Satiba, 22; as to ant-play, 29; as to the use made by ants of leaves, 57; as to the armies of LEeciton, 65; as to leaf-cutting by Satiba, 237 Batrisus, rarely more than one specimen of, found in an ants’ nest, 78 Beckia, one of the ant-guests, 74 Bees, occasional fertility of workers among, 36; means of recognition among, 126; their sense of hearing, 221, 290; ob- servations with, 274; difficulty in finding their way, 278 , their behaviour 1n a strange hive, 281; their recklessness, 285; their want of mutual affection, 286; their influence on the develop- ment of flowers, 51, 291; their colour sense, 291; their prefer- ence for blue, 294-310; experi- ments on communication among them, 276 INDEX. CAR Beetles kept in ants’ nests, 74, 76. 90, 399 Belt, Mr. Thomas, quoted as to floral defences against ants, 51; as to defence against leaf-cut- ting ants, 57; on the raids of Eciton, 66; on an ant-like spider, 66 Bert, Prof. Paul, as to the limits of vision, 219 Bichromate of potash, experiments with, 211 Bisulphide of carbon, experiments with, 208 ; Blanchard, M., quoted as to the origin of nests, 30 Blindness of Anomma and Eciton, 65 ; of Platyarthrus and Beckia, 75 Blue, the favourite colour of bees, 294, 304, 310; flowers, their late origin, 308 Bonnet, M., on aphis eggs, 70 Bonnier, M., on indifference to colour among bees, 302 Bothriomyrmex meridionalis, the eye in, I1 Brazil, blind hunting ants of, 65; use made by the Indians in, of the tenacity of an ant-bite, 96 Buchle dactyloides, seed of, col- lected by ants, 61 Biichner, Dr., as to Texan harvest ing ants, 62 Burmeister, on the power of recog- nition among insects, 126 Butterfly, ants seen licking the larva of, 68 AMPONOTUS inflatus, de- scribed, 390; C. lateralis, 402 — ligniperdus, the eye in, 11; communication among, 158 Captivity, mode of keeping ants in, 2, 3; a wasp in, 315 Caterpillars killed by ants, 59, 65 Caryophyllacee, correlation of form and colour in, 309 INDEX. CHE Chennium, rarely more than one specimen of, in an ants’ nest, 78 Christ, M., on the length of life of queen ants, 9; on ant roads, 25 Chrome alum, experiments as to ant vision with, 2!7 Chromium chloride, experiments with, 217 Claparéde, M, as to insect-vision, 183 Clark, Rev. Hamlet, as to an ant- tunnel in S, America, 25 Claviger,a blind beetle, a guest in ants’ nests, 75, 76; experi- ments with, by M. Lespés, 90 Cleanliness of ants, 29 Coccida, their use to ants, 68 Cocoons spun by some larve of ants, 7 Colobopsis truncata and C. fusipes, two forms of the same species, 20 Colour-sense of ants, 186, 403; of bees, 291, &c.; of wasps, 316; less developed among wasps than bees, 321 Colours of flowers, evolution of, 308 Communication, power of, among ants, 153, &c.; among bees, 156; experiments as to, with ants, 160, 344, 366; with bees, 276 ; with wasps, 311, 377 Communities of ants, 24; power of mutual recognition among members of, 119, 333 Compassion among ants, 106, 108 ; absence of, among bees, 286 Compound eyes ininsects, function of, 407 Co-operation, experiments as to, among ants, 361-366 Correlation of form of knot with stinging power in ants, 13; of colour in flowers with specialisa- tiow of form, 308 Courage of ants, 27 ; of wasps, 314 Crematogaster lineolata, adoption oi a queen by, 34 427 DUI Crematogaster scutellaris, their neglect of friends in trouble, 98; experiments as to percep- tion of colour among, 192, 403 — sordidula, threatening attitude of, 16 Cross-fertilisation effected by in- sects, 50 J) ee limits of vision in, 219 Darkness, education of young ants conducted in, 5; effect of, on the eyes of Platyarthrus and Beckia, 75 Darwin, on the sound produced by Mutilla, 229 — Francis, on the use of the leaf- cups of teazle, 52 Dead, treatment of the, among bees, 287 Defences of flowers against un- bidden guests, 62-7 Degradation of Strongylognathus, 85; caused by slaveholding, 89 Dewitz, Dr., on the non-develop- ment of the sting in the For- micide, 14; on eggs laid by fertile workers, 36, 40 Dinarda dentata in ants’ nests, 76, 77, 401 Dipsacus sylvestris, leaf-cups of, 52 Direction, sense of, among ants, 260, 410 ; guided by the position of the light, 268; sense of,among bees, 278; among wasps, 321, 382 Discs, atrophy of imaginal, in worker ants, 12; cleared by harvesting ants, 61; experi- ments as to sense of direction with rotating, 261, &c. Division of labour among ants, 23. 45; tabular view of experi- ments on, 324 Domestic animals of ants, 68-78 Driver ants. see Anomma arcens Dujardin, M., as to the power of 428 EBR communication among bees, 156, 313 he: M., his observations as to the origin of ants’ nests, 31 Eciton, the eye in, 11 — drepanophora, their order in marching, 21 — erratica, soldiers among, their covered galleries, 65 — legionis at play, 29 — vastator, soldiers among, 21; their covered galleries, 65 Kconomy of labour among ants, experiments as to, 240, &c, Eges of ants described, 6; laid occasionally by worker ants, 35 ; by worker bees and wasps, 36 ; these always produce males, 37; as to difference of sex in, 40; of aphis, tended by ants, 69; and hatched in captivity, 71 Electric light, experiments on ants with, 200 Emery’s observations on Colobopsis, 20; on Camponotus lateralis, 402 Enemies of ants, 26, 67 Evolution of colour in flowers, 308 Experiments, as to the adoption of a queen by ants, 32; as to di- vision of labour among ants, 23, 45, 324; as to their care of aphis-eggs, 70; on Claviger, 90; as to the treatment by ants of injured companions, 94, 107; with chloroformed ants, 98, 108-111; with drowned ants, 99; with buried ants, 102; as to treatment of stranger ants, 104, 119, 124, 333; as to mode of recognition, 108; with in- toxicated ants, 111-118; as to power of recognitionamong ants, 119, 333, 412; and among bees, 126; with ant-pupz removed from nest, 129-147; on sister- ants brought up separately, 147- PANE INDEX, FOO 152; as to power of communi. cationamong ants, 160-181,344- 366; among bees, 274; among wasps, 31l, 377; as to percep- tion of colour, 186, 406; with coloured solutions, 194; with spectrum, 198; with the electric light, 201; as to ultra-violet rays, 200-220, 406; with magnesium spark, 207 ; as to sense of hear- ing among ants, 222; among bees, 290; as to sense of smell among ants, 233, 258; among bees, 288; as to ant-intelligence, 237; as to economy of labour, 241; as to ingenuity among ants, 243-246 ; as to their power of finding their way, 250; as to means of tracking, 168; as to sense of direction among ants, 260, 410; among bees, 278; and among wasps, 321; as to guidance of ants by sight, 266; as to the behaviour of bees ina strange hive, 281; as to their compassion, 286; as to their colour sense, 291; and their preference of certain colours, 302; as to colour sense among wasps, 316 Expulsion of ant from nest, 98 Eyes of two kinds in ants, 10; compound, 182; various de- velopments of, 183 ACETS of the eye in ants, ~ number of, 11; described, 182 Feeding, loss of instinct of, 76, 83, 87 Fertilisation of plants by insects, 50, 291 Fighting among ants, different modes of, 17 Flowers, their defences against unprofitable insects, 51-55; in- fluence of bees on their develep- ment, 291; paucity of blue, 308 Food of ants, 25, 63; its effect in INDEX, FOR determining the sex in ants and bees, 40; individual ants in certain species serve as recep- tacles of, 48 Foragers, certain ants of a nest told off as, 45, 48 Forel, Dr., referred to as to the emergence of pupz of ants, 8; as to their compound eyes, 10; as to the position of spiracles, 14; as to offices of young ants, 22; as to F. rufa, 27; as to ant-games, 28, 29; as to origin of nests, 31; as to eggs laid by | workers, 35; on the honey ant, 40; on the germination of grain in ant-stores, 61; as to beetles in ant nests, 78; as to slaves of FE. sanguinea, 80,398 ; as to slave- naking of Strongylognathus, 85; on Anergatce, 86; on behaviour pf ants to each other, 94; on fecognition among ants, 120, 411; as to power of commu- nication among ants, 158: as to their insensibility to sound, 221; as to special organs in an- tenne, 227; as to their sensi- tiveness to light, 405; on the use of the ocelli, 408 Formica bispinosa, its nest, 24 — cinerea, 16; character of, 27; eggs laid by workers among, 37, 39; duration of life of, 42 — congerens, Thiasophila in nests of, 77 — ewsecta, mode of attack of, 17; extent of nest of, 24; Thiaso- phila in nests +f, 77 — flava, Uropodt: in nests of, 393 — fusca, occasimnally spins a cocoon, 7; its timidity, 27; in- troduction ef a queen among, 34; eggs laitlivy workers among, 38, 39; qneens produced in captivity, 40; longevity of, 42, 415; division of labour among, 45; occasionally found in the nests of #. rufa, 79; enslaved 429 FOR by F. sanguinea, 80; Platy- arthrus received in nests of. 90; their condition analogous to that of the hunting races of men, 91; tneir neglect of friends in trouble, 96; expulsion of a member trom the nest, 98; mite attached to the head of a queen of, 98; neglect of imprisoned companions, 103; hostility towards imprisoned strangers, 194; instances of their kind- ness to crippled companions, 106: experiments as to recog- nition among, 122, 130, 134, 233; on power of communication among, 161,180; as to perception of colour among, 188, 193, 201 Foi nica gagates enslaved by F. sanguinea, 80 — ligniperda, experiments as to sense of hearing among, 223 ; as to sense of smell among, 234 — nigra, experiment as to power of communication among, 359 — pratensis, eye of, 10, 184; at- tacked by /. eaxsecta, 18; its treatment of slain enemies, 27; Stenamma in nests of, 78; large communities of, 119 — rufa, its power of ejecting poi- son, 15; its mode of attack, 17, 27; nests of, 23; large number of insects kept in nests of, 74, 75; Stenamma in nests of, 78 — rufibarbis perhaps a variety of F, fusca, 80 — sanguinea, its mode of attack, 17; duration of life of, 41, 42; Dinarda in nests of, 77: their periodical attack on neighbour- ing nests, 79, slaves made by, 80; not yet degraded by slave- holding, 88; they apparently understand the signals of Pra- tensis, 159; and its slaves, 398 Formicide, one of the three fami- lies of ants, 1; power of sting- ing absent in them, 13 430 FRA Franklin, Dr., as to power of com- munication among ants, 155 Friends, behaviour of ants to, 97, 101; recognition of, 119, 333 ALLERIES, covered, made by Eciton, 65 Galton, Mr. Francis, on domestic animals kept as pets, 77 Games among ants, 28 Gélieu, M., on means of recogni- tion among bees, 126 Gentians, colours of, 310 Glasses, experiments on ants with coloured, 186, &c., 406 Gould. Mr., on the emergence of the imago, 8; on ant-games, 28; on the egys of aphides, 69 Goureau, M., on the sound pro- duced by Mutilla, 229 Graber, Dr. von, on the sense organs in the legs of Gryllus, 231; on colour-sense in ants, &c., 403; onsense of smell] inants, 409 Grain collected and stored by ants, 26,60; germination of, prevented by ants, 61 Gredler, Dr., anecdote of ant-intel- ligence told by, 237 Grimm’s observations on Dinarda, 76 Grote, Mr., quoted as to the neces- sity of morality in societies, 93 Growth of insects takes place during the larval stage, 8 Guests of ants, 74, 399 Gryllus, sense organs in tibiz of,231 ABITATIONS of ants, 24 Hagens, von, quoted as to myrmecophilous beetles, 77; on the slave-making of Strongy- lognathus, 85 ; on Anergates, 86 ; his suggestions as to Strongy- lognathus, 87 Hairs of plants as defences against insects, 55 Harvesting ants, £9, 92; in the South of Europe and Texas, 61 INDEX. INS Hatred a stronger passion with ants than affection, 106 Head of ant described, 10; large size of, in workers of certain species, 20, 22 Hearing, sense of, among insects, 221; possibly present in ants, 226; among bees, 290; among wasps, 313 Heterius sesquicornis, in ants’ nests, 77; H. ferrugineus, 402 Hicks, Dr. J. Braxton, on the antenne of insects, 227 Hildebrand on the variations of blue flowers, 310 Honey, love of ants for, 51; of aphis, 69; experiments on ants entangled in, 98 Honey ants, 19, 48; independently originated in Mexico and Texas, 49; of Australia described, 390 Hope, Mr., quoted as to har¥est- ing ants, 60 Horse ant, see F.. rufa Huber, as to ants playing, 28; as to the formation of a nest, 30; on the care taken by ants of aphis eggs, 70; as to slavery among ants, 81; as to their re- cognition of friends, 120; as to their deafness, 221 Hunting ants, 59, 63, 91 Hydnophytum formicarum, its as- sociation with ants, 58 Hymenoptera, common origin of the sting in the, 15; the social, means of ccmmunication be- tween, 153 NDIVIDUAL differences be- tween ants, 95, 101; between bees, 279 Industry of ants, 27; of wasps, 321, 383 Insects, their metamorphoses, 8 ; their agency in fertilisation of flowers, 50, 291 ; mimicking ants, 66; kept by ants, 73; recogni- tion among, 126; their vision, INDEX. INS 182; their hearing, 221; pos- sibly possess senses inconceiva- ble to ourselves, 225 Insensible ants, experiments with, 99-108 Intelligence among ants, 181, 236; experiments as to, 240 Intoxicated ants, experiments on, 111; tabular view of experi- ments, 118; experiments re- ferred to, 128 ERNEER on floral defences, 52; on the uses of nectaries, 66 Knot in ants, specific characters offered by form of, 13 Kirby and Spence, Messrs., as to power of communication among ants, 156; on the power of sound in Mutilla, 229 ABOUR, division of, among ants, 23, 45 ; experiments as to economising, 240; tabular view of experiments on, 324-332 Landois, on the sound emitted by Mutilla, 229; on stridulating ap- paratus in ants, 230 Langstroth, Dr., as to recognition by smell among bees, 281; on their recklessness, 285 Larve of ants described, 6; of stranger nests carefully tended, 129 Lasius brunneus prefers tne aphides of the bark of trees, 68 — flavus, period of larval life in, 7; the eye in, 11; will not adopt a strange queen, 32 ; mites in the nest of, 67; keeps flocks of the root-feeding aphis, 68; keeps four or five species of aphis in its nests, 73; Platy- arthrus a guest of, 75, 90; they have arrived at the ‘pastoral stage’ of progress, 9); their behaviour to a dead queen, 108; to chloroformed friends and | strangers, 108-111; to intoxi- | 431 LEP cated friends and strangers, 111; their treatment of strangers, 123; perception of colour among, 190, 193, 195; experiments as to sense of hearing amoung, 223 ; stridulating apparatus in, 231; structure in tibia of, 232; want of ingenuity among, 248 ; earth- works constructed by, 249; ex- periments with, as to power of communication, 361; new spe- cies of mite found in the nests of, 391 Lasius niger, workers among, 19; fed by aphides, 25; eggs laid by workers among, 37; longe- vity of, 42; typical nest of, illus- trated, 42; and described, 44; they carry seeds of violet into their nests, 69; their choice among aphides, 68; Platy- arthrus a guest of, 75; Heterius found in nests of, 77; experi- ments as to Clariger in nests of, 90; observations on a wounded worker among, 95; experiments with buried individuals of, 102 with pupe as to recognition among, 131, 413; as to power of communication among, 160, 162, 172, 175, 348-359, 367; as to perception of colour among, 191, 201; as to their intelligence, 240; their want of ingenuity, 242, 246; as to scent, 258; as to sense of direction among, 260, 410; Phora formicarum parasitic on, 395 — fuliginosus, the eye in, 11; stridulating apparatus in, 230 Latreille quoted as to compassion shown by ants, 94 Leaf-cutting ants, 57 Legs of ants described, 12 Leptothorax acervorum, Platy- arthrus a guest of, 75; Tomo- gnathus in nests of, 87 note — muscorum, Tomognathus mw nests of, 87 note 432 LES Lespés. M , on eggs laid by work- ers 35; on grain stored by ants, 61; on the feeding of Lome- chusa by ants, 76; on the domestic arimals of ants, 90 f enckart, his experiments on ant- intelligence, 238 life, duration of, among ants, 8 uight, dislike of ants to, 2, 186; as aid to sense of direction among ants, 268; bees attracted by, 284 Ligurian queen bee, introduction of a, 287 Limits of vision with ants, experi- ments as to, 199-206; in Daph- nia, 219 Lincecum, Dr., as to Texan har- vesting ants, 62 Linnzeus quoted as to aphides, 67 Locust, ants apparently deceived by a leaf-like, 66 Lomechusa fed by ants, 76, 401 Long, Col., as to the sense of hearing among certain ants, 226 Longevity of workers of L. niger, 38. 42. 415; of queens, 9, 40, 415 Lowne, Mr., quoted as to the func- tions of ocelli, 183 Lund, M., quoted as to the intel- ligence of ants, 236 Lycena pseudargiolus, ants seen licking the larva of, 68 CCOOK, Mr., quoted as to the adoption of a queen by Crematogaster, 34; as to honey- ants, 48; as to the grain-fields of the Texan harvesting ant, 62; as to ants licking the larva of a butterfly, 68; on recognition by smell among ants, 127, 414 Markel quoted as to insects kept by F. rufa, 74 Maimonides as to the ownership of ant-stores of grain, 59 Males only produced by eggs laid by workers among bees, wasps, and ants, 36, 37; of Anergates INDEX, MYR wingless, 86; of Tomognathus wingless, 87 note Mandibles of ants, 11; pointed in Polyergus, 18; but toothless, 82; sabre-like in S. Huberi, 84 Marking ants, bees, and wasps, 5 Meer Hassan Ali, as to harvesting ants, 60 Melampyrum pratense, ants and seeas of, 416 Mental powers of ants differ from those of men in degree rather than in kind, 181 Metamorphoses undergone by in- sects, 8 ‘Metamorphoses of quoted, 30 Mexico, honey-pot ants in, 19, 48 Michael, Mr., on Urepoda, 391 Microphone, experiment with, 225 Mimicry, protective, instances of 66, 402 Mischna, rules in, respecting ant- hoards of grain, 59 Mites, ants infested by, 26, 98 new species in nests of Lasite Jiavus, 391 Mocquerys, M., on the tenacity of the bite of the ant, 96 Mogeridge, Mr., on harvesting ants, 61 Morality among ants, question as to, 93; among bees, 285 Mosaic theory of the vision of com- pound eyes, 184 Moseley, Mr. H. N., quoted as to the connection between ants and certain epiphytes, 58 Mouth of ant described, 11 Miiller, his observations on Cla- viger, 76 ; on the mosaic theory of vision, 184; on the colour sense in bees, 307; on blue flowers, 310 Mushrooms grown by ants, 57 Myrmecina Latreillii, the eye in, 11; their mode of defence, 16; said to be pilegmatic in disposi- tion, 27 Insects, INDEX. MYR Myrmecocystus mexicanus, honey- holding individuals among, 19; foragers bring supplies of honey to them, 48 Myrmecodia armata, its associa- tion with ants, 58 Myrmecophilous insects, 68-78 Uyrmica ruginodis, period of lar- val life in, 7; length of life of males of, 9; origin of a nest of, 32; observations on a wounded specimen of, 96; experiments as to recognition among, 121; as to communication among, 164; illustration of terminal portion of antenna of, 227; sense-organ in tibia of, 233; their unwillingness to face a fall, 245 — scabrinodis, cowardly nature of, 27; Platyarthrus a guest of, 75 Myrmicida, one of the three fa- milies of ants, 1; correlation of form of knot with power of stinging in the, 13 ECTARIES, uses of, 56 Nests for ants, artificial, de- scribed, 3, 164; of ants classified and described, 23, &c.; three modes of formation of, sug- gested, 30; of Lasius niger de- scribed and illustrated, 42 Neuters among ants, production of different forms of, 22 Normann, M. de, honey ants bronght from Mexico by, 48 ones or simple eye, in ants, 10; absentin the work- ers of some species, 11; origin of, 182; function of, 407 (Ecodoma cephalotes, the Satiba ant, five kinds of individuals among, 21; extent of nest cf, 24; leaf-cutting among, 237; intelligence of, 239 oe a ig 433 POG eophylia, sting in, 13 Organ of sense in antenna of ant, 226; in tibia of Gryllus, 231; in tibia of ant, 232 Ormerod, Mr., as to the sense of hearing among wasps, 221 Ova of aphis described, 71 note ARASITES of ants, 26, 67, 74, 394, 395; of bees, 26 Pass-word, experiments as to, among ants, 108 ; supposed use of, among bees and ants, 126, experiments as to, with pups, 129; existence of, apparently disproved, 147 Pets, domestic animals kept as, by savages, 77 Phases of life among men and ants, analogy between, 91 Pheidole megacephala, pugnacity of small workers of, 20; experi- ment as to power of communi- cation among, 180; sense-organ in tibia of, 233 — pallidula, the eye in, 11; com- munication among, 158 — providens, its storage of grass seeds, 60 Phora formicarwn, its attacks on ants, 26, 74; described, 394 Phoridz parasitic on ants, 67 74; new genus and species of, 394 Pigs kept as pets by savages, 77 Plagiolepis pygmea, the eye in, 11 Plants, relation of ants to, 50; their different modes of defence against unprofitable insects, 51; benefited by the action of in- sectivorous ants, 59 Plato, epigram by, quoted, 185 Platyarthrus Hoffmanseggii,aguest of the ants, 75; experiments with, 90, 407 Platyphora Lubbockii,67; described, 396 Pogonomyrmex barbatus, stores the ‘ant-rice,’ 61 FF 434 POL Poison ejected by Formica rufu, 15 Polistes, robbery among, 286; P. gallica, a specimen of, kept for nine months, 315 Polyergus rufescens, the eye in, 11; its mode of combat, 18; indi- vidual courage of, 27; males produced from eggs laid by workers among, 39; greatly de- pendent on its slaves, 80, 83,398; slave-making expedition of, de- scribed, 81; degrading effect of slave-holding on, 89; imprisoned friends and strangers equally neglected, 105; power of com- munication among, 158, 180 Polygonum amphibium, glandular hairs absent from specimens growing in water, 56 Ponera contracta, the eye in, 11 Ponerida, one of the three families of ants, 1; form of knot in, 13; stridulating apparatus in, 230 Primulacee, evolution of colour in, 309 Protective mimicry, 66, 402 Pupe of ants, 7; experimented on as to power of recognition among ants, 129, 413 Python said to have been de- stroyed by the Driver ants, 64 UEEN ants, longevity of, 9, 41, 415; their wings, 12; several in anest, 19; reluctance of ants to adopt a new, 32; never pro- duced from workers’ eggs, 36; seldom produced in captivity, 40; treatment of a dead, 108 Queen bees, limited nature of de- votion of subjects to, 287 ANUNCULACE, correla- tion of colour with speciali- sation of form in, 308 Recognition of friends by ants, experiments on, 108, &e., 119, INDEX. SIE 411; after long separation, 123, 233, 333 ; means of, 125 ; among bees, 126; experiments as to, with pupx,129-147 ; as to sister ants brought up separately, 147 ; proved to be communal, not per- sonal, 152 Relations, behaviour of ants to, 93 Retrogression of organs: of sting, 14; of wings, 15; of eyes, 75 | Roads made by ants, ¥o Robbery among bees, 285 Rufescent ants on a slave-making expedition, 81 S* FARGEAU, Lepeletier de, on the origin of ants’ nests, 31; on the benevolence of ants, 94; as to hearing among insects, 221 Saiiba ant, see Weodoma cephalotes Sauvages, Abbé Boisier de, on the connection between ants and aphides, 68 Savage, Rev. T. S., ‘ On the Habits of Driver Ants,’ quoted, 20, 63, 64 Scavengers, some ant-guests may serve as, 75 Scent, power among ants of track- ing by, 124, 171; experimenta with different kinds of, 233; importance of, to ants, 258 Schenk, Anergates discovered by, 86 Secretion of aphis retained till re- quired by ants, 69; of Claviger and Dinarda as food for ants, 75, 76 Seeds of violet collected by ants, 26; stored by ants, 60; and prevented from sprouting, 61 Senses of ants, 182; organs of, 226, 232 Sentinels among bees, 288 Sex of eggs determined by treat- ment, 40, 41 Siebold, von, on sense-organs in INDEX, sIG Gryllus, 231 on robbery among Polistes, 286 Sight, how far ants are guided Py 251, 258, 266, 270 Signals given by ants, 158 Slave-holding, structural changes induced by, 82; degradation caused by, 89 Slave-making ants, 18 ; expedition of, 81 Slavery among ants, origin of, 79; degrading tendency of, 82-89 Smell of Myrmecina possibly pro- tective, 17; on recognition among ants by, 127; sense of, among ants, 233, 408; the pro- bable means of recognition among bees, 281; sense of, keen among bees, 288 Snake killed by Driver ants, 64 Soldiers among ants, 20; those of Satiba do not fight, 22; their origin, 22 Solenopsis fugar, the eye in, 11; the enemy of its hosts, 78 Solomon on the foresight of the ant, 59, 60 Sound, apparent insensibility of ants to, 222; possible existence of, beyond human auditory range, 223, 233; how produced by Mutilia, 229; apparent in- sensibility of bees to, 290 Specialisation of form in flowers correlated with colour, 308 Spectrum, experiments as to per- ception of, by ants, 198 Spiders, their intelligence in es- caping the Kcitons, 66 ; mimick- ing ants, 66; the eyes of, 408 Spiracles of ant, position of, 12,14 Stenamma Westwoodii, the eye in, 11; found exclusively in nests of Formica, 78 Stethoscope-like organs in antenna of ant, 228 Sting in ants, possible correlation of, with form of knot, 13; pro- bable common origin of, in ants, 435 TYN bees, and wasps, 14; atrophied condition of, in Hormica, 15; the loss of, fatal to bees, 283 Stores, made by ants, 59 Strangers, behaviour of ants to- wards, 104, 109, 119, 333 Stridulating apparatus in Mutilla, 229; in ants, 230 Strongylognathus Hubert, its mode of slave-making, 84 — testaceus, the eye in, 11; slave- holders in spite of their feeble- ness, 84; their degradation, 87,89 Sulphate of quinine, experiment with, as to ant vision, 216 Surgical use of ant heads in Bra- zil, 96 Sykes, Mr., quoted as to seed- collecting ants, 60 AME wasp, behaviour of a, 315 Tapinoma, length of period of larval life in, 7 — erraticum, the eye in, 11; their agility, 24; Heterius in nests of, 77 Teazle, possible uses of leaf-cup in, 52 Tetramorium cespitum, the eye in, 11; feigns death as a defence, 17; alleged greediness of, 27 ; enslaved by Strongylognathus, 84; entire dependence of Ane7- gates upon, 85 Texas, harvesting ants in, 61 Thiasophila angulata in ants’ nests, 17 Thorax of ant described, 12 Tibia of Gryllus, sense organ in, 231; of Lasius, 232; of ZLocus- tide, 233 Tonwgnathus sublevis, only workers of, known, 87 note Tracks of ants illustrated, 251-257 Tuning-forks, experiments with, 222 Tunnels formed by ants, 25 Tyndall, Professor, experiment 436 TYP with sensitive flames, 225; as to sense organs in antenne, 228 Typhlopone, absence of eyes in, 11 LTRA-RED rays, ants not sen- sitive to, 206 Ultra-violet rays, sensitiveness of ants to, 201-220, 404 Uropoda formicaria described, 392 ARIETIES produced in beetles frequenting nests of various ants, T7 Verrall, G. H., Esq., description of a new genus of Phorida, 26, 394 Vespa germanica, experiment with, as to communication, 377 — vulgaris, experiment as to colour with, 316 Vibrations producing sensations of sound and colour, 225 Violet light, avoidance of, by ants, 189 Violets, colours of, 309; seeds of, carried into nests by Lasius, 26, 59 Viscidity of plants, a defence against insects, 55, 56 Vision among ants, 182; of the ocelli, 183; of compound eyes, 184; limits of, 199, 206, 219 INDEX. WOR ALKER, Mr., honey ant sent from Australia by, 49 Wasps, occasional fertility of workers among, 36; sense of hearing among, 221,418; experi- ments with, 311, 377; more clever than bees in finding their way, 313; their courage, 314; account of a tame one, 315; their colour sense, 316; their industry, 383 ; special senses of, 418; their sense of direction, 419 Wassman, Dr., on ant-guests, 399 Water, ants’ visits prevented by, 52 Wesmael, M., describes Myrmeco- cystus, 48 Westwood, Mr., on the production of neuters, 22; on the sound produced of Mutilla, 229 Wings of ants, atrophy of, among the workers, 12; pulled off after flight by the queen ants, 12, 19 Winter, aphis eggs tended by ants through the, 70 Workers among ants always wing- less, 12; varieties of form, among, 19-22; occasional fer- tility of, 35; longevity of, 87, 88 PRINTED BY SPOTTISWOODE AND CO. LTD., COLCHESTER LONDON AND ETON Plate 1. Atta barbara § major. 3. Pheidole megacephala § major. 2.—»— —»— »minor. & —»— 5. Formica rufa. » minor. Kegan Paul Trench, Trubner &C® Ltd. Plate 3. 1.Qecodoma cephalotes§ major 3. Stenamma Westwoodiid. a" —— —_"—— » minor. 4.-Solenopsis fugax > Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & C2 Ltd. Plate 4 1. Camponotus inflatus §. 3. Strongylognathus testaceus¥. 2. Tetramorium czespitum ». 4. Anergates atratulus 9. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner &C® Ltd. oe Plate Lasius flavus 9. 5. Beckia. albinos. SS 6. Aphis. Se SS 7. Platyarthrus Hoffmanseg gil. —»— —»—Pupa. 8. Claviger foveolatus. Kegan Paul, Trench, Tritbner &C° Ltd. 3 1) Gz" WA Part of one of my Ant cases, showing circular nest, with pathway leading to the opening. The Ants enter the circular fortification by one or two tunnels not visible in the figure. wy Ne HG | a ag - | 8 Pui of pupe, 4 The shad¢ PLATE 7,—Nest of Lasius niger, showing the entrance, yestibule, main chamber with pillars, and inner room; the queen surrounded by workers ; a group and two kinds of domestic animals, the small Beckias and the blind Woodlice (Platyartirus Hoffmanseggii). up@, and several of larva, sorted according to ages ; shaded part represents earth. See p.42. This is the same nest as that represented on p. 43, but seven years afterwards. 7 ae