LIBRARY OF THE MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY LYON WE BEQUEST OF WILLIAM BREWSTER Diecut ob"), ee Py iety ! Sih z fly bie sed Chey ein Po PNA aie Bree tit Aas DN Mir y Uthna tah Pa ae CABINET AND AMBRIGAN RURAL §PORTS, 97 G Ste WITH ILLUSTRATIONS. A MONTHLY PUBLICATION. VOL. III. AHUATeInHta : PUBLISHED BY JOHN DOUGHTY, NO. 5, LIBRARY STREET, ABOVE FOURTH. WILLIAM STAVELY, PRINTER. INDEX TO THE FIRST NUMBER, VOLUME Prats I. The Beaver. The Beaver, | = = = 5 - : Grotto deb Caries |) - - - = - Obseryations on Ignis Fatuus—by Rey. John Mitchell, - A new property of the fetid matter of the Skunk, - Test of the Percussion Principle, = = Pzate II. Wild Turkey. The Wild Turkey, - - = : 4 A Hunting Excursion on one of the Cordilleras, - Game Laws of Maryland, - > = . ‘¢The Honest Angler,” - = é 5 Curious Contest between a Ferret and a Polecat, The Speed and Strength of the Ostrich, - - Instructions to Young Sportsmen, No. VII. - - IIl. AN DD ee Sy Published by oe Va y, }) Qo ; Re Se Zo Lisa Sie ) TO THE _ FIRST NUMBER, VOLUME III. spntigsieentes § —_~* Bs ~ \ pee — : ie ie a | = S — J USSR AVL! © N S : Ste aN RGEAL & Lory SE = Wittin = SERN LA Ny I yg HO >) | Published by GI Ze hiy, Luke uo Lah lp j pe is 1855 SS ) OM MERELY DIY) Wg “VIAN To THE CABINET OF NATURAL HISTORY, AND AMBRBIGAN BURBAL SPORTS. THE BEAVER. CASTOR FIBER. [Vou. III. Prare I.) Castor Fiber, Gopman, vol. ii. p. 21. SaBINE, app. p. 659. Say. Lone’s Expedition to the Rocky Moun- tains, i. p. 464.—Le Castor ou le Biévre, Briss. Regn. an. p.133.—Le Castor, Burr. viii. pl. 36.—Philadelphia Museum. Tuer is no animal, native of North America, so in- teresting and valuable as the Beaver; and it is equally certain, that few animals of the world have been so much admired and extolled, and, at the same time, have had so large a share of intelligence imputed to them more unjust- ly. But, with all the importance attached to the animal, how much ignorance exists of its true character. If we examine the opinions of men on this subject, we see at once how deeply wrong impressions have become rooted by pondering over the fictitious histories of the Beayer,—or more particularly being influenced, in early youth, by the fabulous stories of the animal, framed as truth, and admitted into the various seminaries of learn- ing. Here we find the Beaver placed at the head of all inferior creatures for sagacity and intelligence, and en- dowed with intellectual qualities superior to many nations or tribes of human beings. This undoubtedly is error, and to overturn it must be the work of time and truth, by the introduction, into schools and families, of authentic histories of the animal, It is, however, no trifling undertaking, to establish truth on prejudicial error, or attack the writings of the learned and eloquent, which have filled the world with theories or false statements, wrought up by ingenuity to almost sublimity. Among the modern writers on Natural History, none seems to have exerted so general an influence as the A «‘Count Burron,” who appears to have been regarded, by most of his successors, as authority substantial and in- dubitable. Under these impressions, many writers have quoted his history of the Beaver, and transmitted it through successive years to the present time, with little contradiction. Among those who followed Buffon’s track, may be named Pznnanv, author of the British and Arctic Zoology, who, in the ‘‘history of his quadrupeds has transcribed the whole of his observations on the habits of the Beaver, from Buffon.’’? Smexutm, also, in his Philoso- phy of Natural History, (a work now used in many schools both in England and America,) has quoted the same author verbatim. Among the opponents of the foregoing author, and indeed of most other writers on the subject of the Beaver, the most formidable is Hearne, whose testimony will be adduced in the sequel of this treatise, and Capt. G. Carrwrigent, in his journal of trans- actions, d&c. on the Labrador coast, published in 1792. Dr. Gopman, also, attacks the same with the following severe remarks:—‘‘ Who has not heard of the wonderful sagacity of the Beaver, or listened to > laboured ac- counts of its social and rational nature. Who that has read the impassioned eloquence of Buffon, to which nothing is. wanting but truth in order to render it sublime, can forget the impression which his views of the economy and character of this species produced ? The enchanter waves his wand, and converts animals, congregated by instinct alone, and guided by no moral influence, into social, ra- tional, intelligent beings, superior to creatures high above them in organization, and even far more advanced than vast tribes of that race which has been justly and em- phatically termed ‘lords of creation.’ Alas, for all these air-drawn prospects! while we endeavour to gaze upon their beauties, they fleet away, and leave no trace behind.” Many living witnesses can also be produced, whose evi- dence is derived from actual observation, against the falsity of those statements of the habits of the Beaver, which heretofore have only been regarded in the light of authenticity. 2 THE CABINET OF NATURAL HISTORY, f The writer of Natural History should be guided by truth in all of his descriptions, carefully avoiding every thing to which he was not an eye-witness, or that cannot be established by the most indubitable testimony; and leave nothing to fancy, or the workings of an enthu- siastic imagination. It is only by the impress of truth, that the mind receives essential benefit, and the more perfect mankind become in the knowledge of animals of the inferior world, the better are they enabled to appre- ciate their own exalted being. There is much to admire, not only in the Beaver, but in all other inferior animals; but our admiration should not be extended to the creature so much, as to the great Original who governs them in their actions in a sphere far above their consciousness. Although the Beaver exhibits much sagacity, and cer- “tainly immense labour and perseverance, in the construc- tion of dams and habitations, and forethought for winter provision,—yet we see the same power operating on many other animals, on a scale equal, if not superior. What do we see more to admire than the nidification of birds? This instinctive provision for their young, is ac- commodated by the parent birds to every place and cir- cumstance, and, built of the most simple materials, their little nests defy the art of man to imitate them. et Mark it well; within, without: No tool had they that wrought, no knife to cut, No nail to fix, no bodkin to insert, No glue to join; their little beaks were all ; And yet how neatly finished. What nice hands, And twenty years’ apprenticeship to boot, Could make me such another ?” The wonderful mechanism of the spider’s web,—the wariness and certainty which that insect displays in en- trapping its victim, —and the wholeeconomy of the honey- bee, have been regarded as so many wonders of the natu- ral world. But are all these guided by any other power than that of pure instinct? Certainly not, as regards their consciousness. In regard to the nature of instinct, it may be said, that the mind is too often led astray by wrong objects—or by forming a wrong basis for argument. For instance, we sometimes see a departure from the regular laws of instinct in animals around us,—as in the elephant, the horse, the dog; &c. In these are frequently exhibited apparent sa- gacity, memory, discernment, and other reasonable ope- rations. But before we conclude from this, that the brute creation possess intellectual properties, we should inquire, what effect has the influence of man, or domestication, on them from which we would found our argument? It is to these, and other animals of like domestication, that recourse is always had, to prove the brute world possesses reason as well as instinct. Those animals, therefore, sub- ject to domestication, are not proper objects from which to draw that conclusion; for it is evident, that these were originally intended for purposes connected with the comforts and welfare of mankind,—and the formation of their instinctive powers are such, as to be subject to his influence and guidance. Indeed, we see a wonderful in- fluence exerted by human presence on all nature; and, as we are told in sacred writ, that God hath placed in all beasts the fear of man, it is reasonable to conclude, that the intelligence of the human species, imparted in a measure by association to the sagacity of those animals, often produces effects on them, which lead to results aston- ishing and wonderful. 5 Aside from these animals, over which man has exercised his influence, we behold all others governed by laws of necessity, which impel them in their course of operations, only to answer the end for which they were originally de- signed in a state of nature. The same potent energy which created, also guides them in those wonderful plans of necessity which we so much admire; and, al- though they are thus influenced and directed by a supe- rior intelligent power, they have no consciousness of this exciting energy, nor can they appreciate the result of their labours, or yalue the interest attached to their ac- tions. Under this view, then, it may be said, that brutes only belong to the natural world; or, in other words, not pos- sessing moral qualities, they do not belong to the moral world. They have no moral freedom of action, although they produce results often which would lead us, under a wrong view of the subject, to draw a different conclusion. Instances may be produced of actions in the dog, more moral or perfect, in an abstract sense, than those per- formed by human creatures; but we cannot for a moment admit that these are efforts of their own consciousness, un- less we place them in a scale of moral excellence superior to man. But these actions are only apparently moral, .as regards their conception, and not really so; for these ani- mals are not capable of appreciating the excellence of their acts, nor to decide of their superiority over those of other brutes. Intelligence, moral actions, and science, there- fore, are not objective to brutes, but are exercised on their natures by a governing power, above their perception or consciousness. Having made these prefatory remarks, the history of the Beaver, in the form of a parallel, will be given, the authentic on one side, and the discarded or fabulous on the other. -MERICAN RURAL SPORTS. 3 z to the na- he water in m is almost it is always the stream. drift-wood, be got; also as must evi- dut in these ved, except ular sweep, | by Beaver ;, become a ith of water 1 generally ma kind of iome places among the yus. Where habit lakes, 2eks which us country en by them 2es are suit- rent to con- tations, and » be taken, sta ond, river, a or building they some- ULMLES VULLU UIE PULLILS, SUIMCLIIUES LIL LLG 1L01LL0W of a bay, and often on small islands; they always choose, however, those parts that have such a depth of water as will resist the frost of winter, and prevent it from freezing to the bottom. «