CP OF RET {EDR 8) Ay sey : E a . Te On Ph * iy ry e " ad Ws ) A ALS t§ he Sear Te Re ae 1) ae ; UN Ane : i i Mes . Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2007 with funding trom Microsoft Corporation http://www.archive.org/details/californiaspecieOOferruoft ecta LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS UNIVERSITY SERIES THE CALIFORNIA SPECIES OF MEALY BUGS BY GORDON FLOYD FERRIS Instructor in Entomology STANFORD UNIVERSITY, CALIFORNIA PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY 1918 1, } Wo RUA Ta lan Nie yung ia is ae CONTENTS A. Introduction : : ; ‘ ; ; Senate. I. Purpose and scope of the paper 5 II. Acknowledgments and material . : BRAS e Ill. Types . : : . : ; : ‘ Bee B. Methods of Study 8 C. Taxonomic value of morphological characters, secretions, and biology , : ; : ‘ ‘ ‘ ee I. Morphology ; j : 5 : ‘ rhe 8 1. Adult female . , ; : : ‘ ; ' ere (1). Antennae. : ‘ P ; : : 1) (2). Les. : ; 4 : ( : Pet Wea (3). Mouthparts . . : ; : . ; « 20 (4). Dorsal ostioles . : ‘ ; ; ‘ a 20 (5). Cerarii : . i A j , : ony (6). Anal lobes . I : ; : ; : a ae (7). Pores and ducts . ; , ; : . ae (8). Body setae . : me AS (9). Anal ring and anal lobe setae ; ; ; ae, (10). Anal ring . , p ; : : 4 (42). Spiracles ; : ; : : : ae 2. Larvae . ; ; ; : ; : ; ; aes. 3. Adult male : : ; : - aye II. Secretions . , : , ; a III. Biology ‘ § : : : ; : ong”? D. Systematic treatment . , : : : i ; : a0 I. Definition of the group : ‘ : ‘ ; ; ee II. Generic concepts . , é hack 56 : gee III. Synonymical list of names applied to California species 2 aie IV. Key to genera represented in California ; . ; BO CONTENTS V. Description of genera and species A, . Phenacoccus y OCNA ww ff W WH Pseudococcus . Puto’ . Heterococcus . . Trionymus . Ripersiella . Cryptoripersia Erium Antonina FE. References cited INTRODUCTION PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PAPER The systematic literature dealing with certain groups of the Coccidae or scale insects is extremely unsatisfactory, this condition being especially pronounced in the case of those groups commonly called the “soft scales.” The present author (4)+ has stated in an earlier paper that “. . . of the nearly 100 species of mealy bugs thus far described from North America, including some 35 from California, not more than three or four are recognizable at all on the basis of the published descriptions if taken apart from their typical host and their type locality,” nor at the time of the present writing does this statement need any extensive modification. A few species have been described since the statement was originally made and to some of these it may not apply, but so far as the species known at that time are concerned, the additional claim may safely be made that even under the optimum conditions cited, the identification of many of our species can not be accomplished with reasonable certainty. The actuating motive of the present paper has been the hope of remedying this condition as far as may be for those species of mealy bugs occurring in California. However, progress toward this goal has been made possible only by the utilization of certain methods not ordi- narily employed, at least by American entomologists, and by the empha- sizing of certain morphological features of which some have been en- tirely overlooked and of which the full significance of none seems at any time to have been realized. The scope of the paper has therefore been extended to include an explanation of these methods and a description of these morphological features. The restriction of the paper to those species occurring in California has not been due to any desire to keep within the boundaries of some artificially defined political unit nor to any belief that the California mealy-bug fauna is at all separable as a group from that of the rest of North America. The limitations imposed have been purely those of can- venience. It so happens that most of the species known from west of Colorado and New Mexico have been described from California and that the types of these are for the most part in western collections. It also happens that most of the California species have been taken from two +Numbers in the text refer to the list of references cited at the end of the paper. 7 6 THE CALIFORNIA SPECIES OF MEALY BUGS rather restricted localities, thus making it a comparatively simple matter to procure topotypic material. While it has therefore been convenient to treat of the California species as a separate group, the disadvantages of so doing have been fully realized. The range of most of our species is by no means so restricted as would appear from the published records and it is highly probable that at least a part of the species herein recorded as known only from Cali- fornia occur in the eastern states as well. In fact it is definitely estab- lished that at least three species have been described under different names from California and from the eastern or central states and it is almost certain that the same thing is true of some others. For the sake of stability in nomenclature it is highly desirable that the mealy-bug fauna of the entire continent be treated as a unit, but it has not seemed wise to wait until this can be done. A beginning must be made some place. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND MATERIAL Acknowledgments are due first of all to Mr. E. O. Essig of the University of California, who has most kindly placed his entire collection, including types, at my disposal with the fullest permission to remount any of the specimens as I saw fit. Without this assistance it would lit- erally have been impossible to proceed. Scarcely less am I indebted to Mr. E. M. Ehrhorn of Honolulu, who has made numerous comparisons of specimens with types in his collection and who has lent material of critical importance. Mr. C. P. Claussen, of the California State Board of Horticulture, has also lent types of manuscript species in his collec- tion and has assisted in procuring other material. Mr. A. F. Swain of the Citrus Experiment Station at Riverside, Mr. S. P. McClenahan of Palo Alto and Professor R. W. Doane of Stanford University have aided in the procuring of several species which could not otherwise have been obtained. Mr. Harold Morrison of the Bureau of Entomology has ren- dered invaluable aid by comparing specimens with types in the National Collection of Coccidae at Washington and by notes which he has gen- © erously furnished. Mr. E. E. Green has supplied me with material of several genera and species having a bearing upon the general problems connected with this group. To all these gentlemen are due the fullest thanks for their assistance. With the material obtained from the above sources, together with that in the Stanford collection when I began work and with that procured by my own efforts, I have been enabled to examine types, topotypes or other authentic material of nearly all the species recorded from the state. Two species have escaped me entirely, and of a few I have not been able INTRODUCTION 7 to see authentic material, although I believe I have satisfactorily identi- fied them. Two species which have been recorded from the state, but which were certainly introduced and are not now known to occur here, have been passed over with a mere mention. TYPES The types of all the new species herein described are in the Stanford collection. In all cases a holotype has been selected. It is perhaps not out of place to urge that this method be adopted by all students of the Coccidae, for even in this limited study three cases have been met with in which more than one species had been included in material labeled type. There is really no more reason for failure to name holotypes in this group than in any other. METHODS OF STUDY The satisfactory study of any of the scale insects demands the use of special methods in the preparation of specimens for microscopic ex- amination and such methods are especially useful in the group here under consideration. I feel no hesitation in saying that by far the greater part of the difficulty that has been experienced in dealing with this group has been due solely to the unsatisfactory methods usually employed in the making of microscopic mounts. Satsifactory work can not possibly be done on the basis of tangled masses of antennae, legs and spines, or of specimens so transparent that they can scarcely be located on the slide. Yet it is exactly upon such preparations as these that most of the sys- tematic work on this group has been based. The possession of first-class preparations is as essential for the proper study of these insects as is the possession of a microscope. In the past, the difficulty has been due for the most part to the lack of satisfactory methods by which good preparations may be obtained and to some extent to the failure to use those methods which were available. Within recent years the problem has been attacked by various investigators and there no longer exists any excuse for the employment of the crude and unsatisfactory methods with which authors, until very recently, have been content. Green (5), Brain (2), Stafford (10), and Dietz and Mor- rison (3) have all recommended methods, the simplest and least cumber- some of which is perhaps that described by Stafford. This, with certain modifications, is the one which I have employed. The general method is simple enough. Specimens may be preserved either dry or in alcohol, preferably the latter, as it is sometimes, quite difficult to straighten out individuals which have become wrinkled in dry- ing. The loss of the secretionary covering in the alcohol is a minor point, for the final determination of species cannot be made from this covering and it is usually of incidental assistance only. To prepare the specimens for study they should be boiled in a weak solution of caustic potash. This, for reasons which I shall later explain, should not be more than about an 8% solution. The boiling should be carried merely to the point where the body contents are thoroughly disintegrated, this point usually being reached before the color has been entirely lost. The specimens should then be removed to clean water in a watchglass under a binocular micro- scope (one of the most indispensable aids in procuring first-class prepara- tions), a slit cut in one side of the body and the body contents pressed METHODS OF STUDY 9 out through this opening. For this purpose a straight needle and one with the tip bent at right angles to the shank are most useful. Upon the care with which this operation is performed, including the careful flat- tening out of the body in the most favorable position for study, will depend much of the value of the mount. It should be remembered that the body contents will take the stain and if not thoroughly removed will more or less obscure the characters that it is necessary to see. Trouble is frequently experienced at this point due to the formation of hard, white lumps either within the body or partially encasing it. Ap- parently these lumps are formed by the combination of the caustic potash with the body fats and there seems to be no way by which their formation can be prevented. However, they are readily soluble in carbol-xylene and may be removed by placing the specimens in a small amount of 95% alcohol containing a few drops of this reagent. This should not be done, however, until the specimens have been’‘cleaned as thoroughly as possible, as the alcohol hardens the body contents and makes them difficult to re- move. The carbol-xylene should be washed out in 95% alcohol before the specimens are placed in the stain. If difficulty is not experienced with the formation of such lumps the specimens may be removed to the stain directly from the water in which they are washed. The stain which I have used is Magenta and I cannot speak in regard to the action of any of the others that have at times been recommended. This stain may be procured in liquid form. The strength of the solutions obtained seems to vary somewhat, but there appears to be very little, if any, difference in their staining qualities and they can sometimes be much diluted with water. Staining is best carried on in deep hollow slides having a ground-glass surface upon which data may be written. These should be covered with a coverglass and the stain allowed to run out under this. The evaporation of this stain under the coverglass will seal a slide so effectively that it may sometimes remain for days without drying out. Usually a half hour is sufficient to give a stain as good as can be obtained, this having been demonstrated by numerous experiments. The: specimens should then be removed to 95% alcohol in which the excess stain is washed out, then placed for a moment in carbol-xylene (three parts xylene to one part carbolic-acid crystals) and then mounted in balsam. If the staining has been effective the resulting mount should show all spines and chitinized areas of a bright red, while the remainder of the derm is perfectly clear. As I have said, the general method is simple enough, but care in numerous details which one can only learn from experience is necessary to get the best results. Above all care must be taken that the specimens 10 THE CALIFORNIA SPECIES OF MEALY BUGS do not become unduly heated, as this destroys their staining qualities, the resulting preparation being of a uniform bluish color and showing little or no differentiation between the various parts. It is for this reason that a weak solution of caustic potash should be used, for it ap- pears that the boiling point of a strong, “soupy” solution is somewhat higher than the critical point. It is especially noteworthy that the method outlined above may be used for the purpose of rendering old mounts suitable for study. The results obtained are sometimes not as good as with fresh material, but they are usually very much worth while. The specimens should be re- moved from the mount if possible without the use of heat, or if heat is necessary, it should be very carefully applied. The specimens should then be freed from the medium in which they have been mounted, the method of doing so depending upon what medium has been used. If the medium is balsam they should be soaked in carbol-xylene or a similar reagent, if glycerine jelly they may be boiled in caustic potash. In any case this boiling should not be omitted, as it renders the specimens flex- ible. Following this the treatment proceeds in the usual manner. The only risk encountered in attempting to stain old mounts lies in the pos- sibility that they may have been overheated when they were originally made and this can only be discovered by experiment. However, this risk may partially be avoided by staining but a part of the specimens con- tained in the mount. TAXONOMIC VALUE OF MORPHOLOGICAL CHAR- ACTERS, SECRETIONS, AND BIOLOGY MORPHOLOGY The morphology of the mealy bugs has been dealt with to some extent by Berlese (1) who has described some of the structures that are available for taxonomic purposes, although he has not himself carried out any taxonomic studies; Marchal (7) seems to have been the first to make use of these characters. Smith (9a) has investigated the value of the characters ordinarily employed and in a later paper (9b) has dis- cussed the possible value of others. Brain (2) has also pointed out the possible value of many characters not ordinarily employed, although, curi- ously enough, he does not himself make any particular use of these char- acters. In no case does there seem to have been any real appreciation of the full value of the characters observed and there still remain some that do not appear to have been noted at all. | In view of the fact that no wholly satisfactory discussion of the tax- onomic value of the various morphological features of this group exists it is necessary to consider the matter at some length. Unfortunately the material available for study is somewhat limited and most of the conclu- sions presented must be regarded as but tentative. However, they apply to the material examined by me (which includes a number of species not coming within the scope of this paper), and very probably apply to a considerable degree to the remainder of the group. Adult Female _ Antennae.—Almost since the serious study of the Coccidae began the antennae have been relied upon to furnish both generic and specific cri- teria. The present generic concepts in the group here under consideration are based in large part upon the number of segments in the antennae of the adult female and the relative or actual lengths of the individual seg- ments have been much used for purposes of specific differentiation. The value of the antennae in defining generic groups will be discussed in a later paragraph on generic concepts and we shall here consider merely their value as specific criteria. If we compare a limited number of individuals of a few species it may not only appear that there are certain rather obvious differences in the actual lengths of the individual segments and of the antennae as a whole, but there may also be differences in the relative lengths of the 12 THE CALIFORNIA SPECIES OF MEALY BUGS segments, differences which are somewhat difficult to express. Attempts to present these differences in a tangible way have led to the introduction of the familiar “antennal formulae” and the more recent “antennal graphs.” The weakness of the antennal formulae is now fully realized and they are at present but little used, yet their pernicious effects remain, for few, if any, of the species established largely upon them have ever been redescribed and many of these must stand in our literature as doubt- fully recognizable, or even not recognizable at all, until their types have been re-examined. I cannot but consider the original introduction of these antennal formulae as the most unfortunate mistake that has been made in the study of the Coccidae. The antennal graphs have been but recently introduced and have not received any extensive trial. It will therefore be desirable to consider them at some length. It may be said in their favor that if the antennae are at all to be used as specific criteria no better method than this can be devised by which to present the facts: The weakness of the method will be in large part due to the unsatisfactory character of the material with which it must deal. It can at the best do nothing more than transfer difficulties from the slide to the paper before us where they may perhaps be analyzed. | | The method of constructing these graphs is quite simple. The actual measurements of the individual segments are obtained by the use of an ocular micrometer. Then upon a sheet of co-ordinate paper certain units are laid out along one axis to represent the individual segments and upon the other axis are plotted the lengths. Connecting up the points thus obtained we have a graph which will give a very clear indication of the relative and actual lengths of the segments. Plotting the graphs of sev- eral antennae will indicate the range of variation. The method of con- structing these graphs has been discussed at length by Brain (2) and Hollinger (6) and for the purpose of this paper a combination of the methods used by both of these authors has been employed. In order that these graphs may be of value for taxonomic purposes it must be shown that the graphs of different species are sufficiently dif- ferent and sufficiently constant to permit of differentiation between the species. Brain and Hollinger have considered that this condition is met, the former having relied very heavily upon these graphs and the latter having stated that with him the graphs “formed the working basis” for specific indentification. : I may say without reserve that I consider these graphs to be fully as illusory and fully as dangerous as were the now wholly discredited antennal formulae. ; The objections to these graphs are both general and specific. TAXONOMIC VALUE OF MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS 13 The graphic method is essentially a method of averages. Even though it be true that the average graph of any species is relatively con- stant this does not aid in the identification of non-average individuals. We must deal with individuals and not with averages. The graphs are neither sufficiently distinctive nor sufficiently con- stant to be of value in separating species. In those cases where two or more species occur together on the same hosts the graphs will not, in general, reveal the fact that more than one species are present. The range of observed variation in those species which have been sufficiently studied is so great as to preclude the use of the graphs. In proof of these contentions I shall present certain specific instances. The two species, Pseudococcus crawu (Coq.) and P. quercicolus n. sp. occur in the vicinity of Stanford University upon the same hosts and have at times been found together. In life they are so very similar that they are scarcely distinguishable, but structurally they are very different, as a reference to the figures illustrating the two will show. Text figures 1 and 2 present the graphs of these two species. These 4o = Nw SN Ns x vA INN = \NY 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Fig. 1—Pseudococcus crawii (Cog.); antennal graph drawn from specimens taken from Quercus chrysolepis in the vicinity of Stanford University. graphs were obtained from individuals taken from the same host plants in the same vicinity. The two graphs coincide practically throughout and it is obvious that no amount of contemplation of a graph, including both species, would reveal the fact that two species are present. Again, let us consider the case of Pseudococcus ryani (Cog.) and P. sequoiae (Coleman). These two species occur together on Sequoia sempervirens in the vicinity of Stanford University and both have been recorded from various species of Cupressus. The two species are suf- 14 THE CALIFORNIA SPECIES OF MEALY BUGS ficiently different in life to indicate that they are distinct and structurally, while very similar, are sufficiently well marked to be readily separable in = 4a i | WV i £4 KL \ VET 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Fig. 2.—Pseudococcus quercicolus n. sp.; antennal graph drawn from specimens taken from Quercus chrysolepis and Pasania densiflora in the vicinity of Stanford University. 7 Ut LH | [| aeRO FA Se SE ay “hy PS Stk Be “SSS Se a SESE = a ee 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Fig, 3.—Pseudococcus ryani (Cog.) and P. sequoiae (Coleman) ; antennal graphs drawn from specimens taken from Sequoia in the vicinity of Stanford Uni- versity; graphs of ryani drawn in solid lines, those of sequoiae in broken lines; shaded area indicates the gap between the two. good preparations. Text figure 3 represents the graphs of the two spe- cies obtained from individuals taken from Sequoia in the same locality. It will be noted that the two graphs are in part quite distinct and that there is an evident tendency for the average of one to lie well below the TAXONOMIC VALUE OF MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS 15 average of the other. Still it is fair to ask to what extent these graphs would be of aid did we not already know the two species to be distinct. 4 / ' ; J / ooh caN Z y || NS WN 7 WN yy Sa ee = a J = — -_ — = =e a 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Fig. 4.—Pseudococcus ryani (Cog.) and P. sequoiae (Coleman) ; antennal graphs drawn from specimens taken from various hosts and localities; position of graphs as in fig. 3. Text figure 4 presents the graph obtained by using all the available speci- mens of these two species from different hosts and localities. It will be noted that the gap between the two graphs has entirely disappeared, although the average graphs would still lie quite far apart. Again it is fair to ask if anyone would separate these species on the basis of such a 40 / >. > SN ~ es eS ied aed ~N \ bars We a eM 20) = aN Yt Sw“ > al Ss SS — i, Se 4) — 2 3 4 S 0 7 8 Fig. 5.—Pseudococcus longispinus (Targ.) ; antennal graph drawn from specimens taken from various hosts and localities. 16 THE CALIFORNIA SPECIES OF MEALY BUGS graph did he not already know them to be distinct, or, knowing them to be distinct, where he would draw the line between them. 40 Y SS — — vel = a a St - 3 4 5 6) 7 8 Fig. 6—Pseudococcus citri (Risso); antennal graph drawn from specimens taken from citrus. Hi fl 2. a 4 / Fig. 7.—Pseudococcus citrophilus Claussen; antennal graphs drawn from speci- mens taken from citrus and other hosts. In text figures 5 to 8 are shown the graphs of the four species, Pseudococcus longispinus (Targ.), P. citri (Risso), P. citrophilus (Claussen) and P. maritimus (Ehrhorn). All four of these species occur f on citrus, as well as on many other hosts, in California. They are readily separable in life and structurally are very different and very easily recog- nizable. Yet the graphs of the first three fall almost entirely within the graph of P. maritimus nor is there sufficient difference between any of TAXONOMIC VALUE OF MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS 17 them to “form a working basis” for their separation. It may be pointed out that the use of more individuals would in all probability have in- creased the difficulty in distinguishing between the graphs due to the | introduction of extreme forms. | 49 a ee fh, y roe fT ta NY eae : =a AN Ng — — WYNN — SS AYA 4 R i; 2 s Wy —T ae N — Qs “i —= — | = cy 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Fig. 8..Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrh.) ; antennal graphs drawn from specimens from various hosts and localities. 4 pe a \ a's ZN i 2 NN aN SW B NRE = ~4 N OY om N 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Fig. 9.—Pseudococcus maritimus (Ehrh.); antennal graphs of specimens taken from Mesembryanthemum at La Jolla (above) and Rubus vitifolius at Stan- ford University (below). The shaded area indicates the gap between the two. In text figure 9 are shown the graphs obtained from specimens of P. maritimus taken from Mesembryanthemum at La Jolla, Calif., and from Rubus vitifolius at Stanford University. There is more difference 18 THE CALIFORNIA SPECIES OF MEALY BUGS between these two lots of specimens belonging to the same species than there is between any of the species previously discussed. It may, of course, be asserted that we are here dealing with distinct species. It is true that structurally these individuals are slightly different but the dif- ferences are at the best small and are connected by a complete .series of intergrades. ; 40) ] 2 Lapeny | Sib is He _ K q Re ia oe % NS a at Gs Ve TALL Sm Oe a VA ENS ‘NS eT =e / pS Na Zoe S> | y NS \ —_ ——™~ eye Pr eee Bee oe 7 = aa recat msi Shey kro NAOT 8 nt st ORME ? ide ye onal ‘ pe ane : - 2 ~~ Yr * aa " septate tiie! PUPP OR OTe Giada ns Gein’ S a va wre ‘ > ye - rier oa a = : “decd eal wt may PIGEON AIP AO aaa reer nee meee 5 ea a+ mr im a ; —_ ? tr te—o- tt 64 ? yer ye eee ore > pe ee ar ets A tps or sited ethno : Pa Ree Cit ay peat a ~—e fyeeh cial 7 . Lneugeic ww tr "7; Nee mya te I PE 8A ete a vt PF 7 - ~ on - cematageeneti nag 7 4, —) bach % y*. ow s Be (aot! met + Deth kate _ — He PI te Lae . a A vem Pat 3 oe ee Te ene’ tee : “oi rehigtw ty " eens = pene a Eek Pe ees a be aretha oe a UE se PE OS PET ra eae! - nee ST i TAAL PORATION lie yh 4 Wt aon ie mil a Soper gad ae Q ayia? Sil, om > : snes ae ain _ ne mee es - ite ares Pert era I9 te Rte Rat Safe bi : ee eS nate 1 At DON rttiminh tabid eA IW AS FE eh OO tay be ee ne - - ee ek “= We ean te yee iglav® hte on Sue han al Soot agente ea eller eh ieee ah tenet ration pee gp ate ea Ne nee ceri ee tp eee WT EL Tek = tiple eae Seer es pn se nytt y a es ea 4 C4e- gus anee : ~~ Putt oF : ett tie 4 Pe lane cera wt cade eke ee | seal tte vinciad seine stmt | met ees it on euie abadianahihen tee - >< fa Tae fg Papen. 3 APE If LIAO A A EMA OT NTS IM Rp eases onte ih gate retest ee et alan” kde i tag apraeed PM ae at NEES le BE mane ~ meee See eS aah Conair a yee on “yt te ting me ns wes tate es Pig LEAL IT COL aa tntoeneney fee < ie inna ia Sac 1 te Lot AB ad > BSA NIMS og ote a Pees cat — ert ee pe prt a r€ ae aor eye ses wee: 6 wot ~~ Pe Aa a APOE pg -

" hea = aye mah 0 een Pot FS, ¢ 4 . = re a bee —— Ay “r tart - > 7 a . bg tot Set fe Ohare apd ro Se A et AED Atl tate Fee ati # Patty wt , pee —— 0 rf ee eo te imp tne ~ let 1p Oe ED ew Ny - pte fee fo art yr eon + pO DHIN ey nto 0 tytn hort o SLOG yt gr Un RE ORG tastied # Set -e Bwteyy "a 2 pe A tg at fee i OE He See Me See te SPS ay ies om ead 8 Ae me hm SO pte erut-g eet oN eee _ Mey: SP SP a E pwek et ys ale GF + * - ; ha la So Ne PNY Rt ap th ae or et Te te Lschenates. Cate petite a ote oe a ete 2 ; = — oe ta 2 x Gai Radhssel Pe aiptpinnacnou cat tre Riera ie cane tinch ae adaseANSa Atah o . . et ree te ya vi m ek oe +4 mv sb > FS pte 2 seal ingnncegT edlitaneed re: i s neal nome ee he —~ piper — ag at Briand tenes Aad Etoile tglatyh anitehtet apes bt tag at atc a pa ima adnate Aen 9 4-0" Prt cmt i ota - ne * - yt a Sarl 7 5 = . on BOD We roe a er eee cpa 3 " — ee ee eS eA dan on: ~ ye “a Mpc tenn tie | ane hand aba muagtseees eeres se “ eee ey OE ti —- BA te Bi hye D> v ‘ ¥ PR. pv 16:50 nh mineae teed Se RE eae a Wr Sen) A ater ia ela > ae 14 PPAR! 200 e wet _ sean ee remiss eBid pe yeep se po pasneusaamcessaane +o a aa Ae ON Be A tr ane : peeneier ett rie - epintatgihedatea nigh uP ata Rigs od tisha ay ianeeienannee my ae He ; aad —* weerts ae aditlradoin ss —s pane r so eecih ae entepiestieen ceticemeienaat ee ae aes pitta * » aad _- et apy ate, pe eee that # srib as p sti ¥ saad = aml ES a ty a ec a ard ens Atty a “2 pees um ae ghee ertr ln aut Suton guava ss ae ccnp Rr nietchen emai renee aia peace © oi Ps cry Set per nhs heay te Fo of ds ere Me wa cm oe + PN 4 ae te cmt attipa site ett Beate fot mili te ( ot enn ete He AGI oe ete ee RIS e EOS tre. ce batinedadinbcah nieseeeae aye Os th ae tote + SA me tent an! ely tae rik ait oa Ryo temeniy ty ER APA co nod min Got enw Sent > cn mp ea i it ee ra ae Nem ter aitin reT Sea eg 4 1 Te rn wo lt an ry . tema pe 2 A a ore 7 wend ie ow < . “ Les mag? ache a | lh re Senn PRS A SAR ORR DESAIE MESSE ee rates oak 4 ree pine ites narbe. eo sapeemmnnetins ° ¥ Filaaibaninea allaonrgusdiemteenigunctdRicts Sktiger noagieelanha al eeaNeLAd [re ee 3 npn - nedeenmtraaibnne did Mieciraapsre asthe sea pealdelece Reis ya. secs Pe beaseer"G gaat DeePOGIAG en 7 Net thy 7 Ree te ete > tee penne EAT o flee aco ey im . a4 p GE Or -aachpininn a+ uamanaad cae . aie! ; ae AD Ged, reer ti Me Spee tsnd ptpruingawg tas tab wheveee te sgead" et iy tty A lio SO Cone au cumiaths sth 35 < re eh eet A Rina nh Ain omer 49 ie or he epee Chcewr™ me na ua eronneneneravanitael Meer RD: : rn 6 llar 8 ita < ort a aa ene e pekineeta+ 4 : ee ee ee ae he oe se “cat dct Sth ae a ITE Ne ITE AP a eA ® as ps ie ie jal = este a y : ~ ete mewieaeh het aeacd “-- : : nt deere’ ea Fe a cd tae ethene te eee inate epee Ee eee ~ v Me ait tt a at haat oe ah “4 nt goes 6 tat NE Ot re 1 meh ef ativan te Site mses eta ean if Teapots Sethe aa cae a ——<_, " ear pe ee a ee ee oo ten tele ee, anes Laban Gustine ers : pena tetaesueimnrab ye senees: ageeee : came Rar i a permhanie ir ge er ap Sceaeenaed Le deat herinaesaivnne beanie treaansa amet mink eimenenne tes cubainn+hanebpipinde-ereae Het poy ap hie Fan + PO a Bi ne ha et Tea Sut teapatien ak eeninan Hh asi tigh es lire RatiniaRah hyenas s otha ht 7 pra oo pera as tiie eh A Pe ey nat G RRS 7 SO re NAY meter pnd Beem rt «2 wa energie OOS a Soyrnes B wher ~ocileteadad teate eat tae a PSOE I fa RE PEE A 0 th eB BRE oT te Pee NOEs hae narra ry peli eparure es se ee ye AI: tt pee 2 te Ot Seren ye: ethane “del sae 4 Re Her aittinc-werp ap ab-anroe = beew eee es hrc epceaigesniite: 7 Che pave® rns ea eve iewaiedl . Key atom hee re ene ge tempt nay te wHE se aE HaueP Cm ummaetie or > So-ta0t Kepeshs a silent Tt dd aloe sete he ~ 2 ses) cal ential page ‘ * pt ry oe Re thea, v 7 ply Rant ow ly eS ee ee Pam SR HEM sealer ahd Sa + nyo. atte ob eeeabaes teepaiane eiaeaes Cree pere et er nmen ae at erie , ‘pape Eos adh (aot ee 4 ch ini Sabhartranah*nasrsananeel ¢ ‘ r i ie biG pamper hthe WoweRehi gest ay SORA aap oatobeoe: pha Wi nln +h an taney oan maar ead mate it at 4 sehr tins nyt ph nr ee, sah TNS et a Pore oe. pee ON See Nas i Pose Sera gregh me PGA NAS HE PO RR Hel ED pow $4 earl ote RL PNERACG I pF ripen) sab ayanee east 2 B03 apm Fe: vedery: eet nS te pe ted Rt a et reaedh ieee errrre tt Tt So eater aihe shone opgmneal - ucazqueswakbipent neha ; = 6 Saree err oe ae peat a P : Pret Peense uh weet te ere Sierras ere —_ Se conned madaoanal SECRETE ST To an pests tame 5e ion Lei . fee , ap Loman as wie : ‘d net lw iapnetl il rt pee ried ed eh tet Lees rear ee rah, p ards piaakentaaadee Her AS Rene dee ge were Che < Ave enon or ake ot fine ~ Bedside cme yee ets where pRecniut nly are Prec it ihr Ne PRAY POL Coa a OT rae abereheQet Tere avvne tatiana sasemace hel coos fre, eee ads some : a3 OOS AT eee Sette 4 AIREY A A 0 We ak ares Aah eet ibe i ‘ , - GPR eRREND SS STE ETDS! SENOS, unoteteats - penn errata one ee aaron. oF aE OTE thie gs ct thenmgery ~ eh aO Bde oO : ye ie ci Sera catia ¢ ¥ tee ma! arm Peketve pied + eee a ee ee eee tt * Anan int 1 Niger Me may taal FO es he Pt ee atid cal eee et eee re pokaa sag oaieNs en - — sh nan hana Renee aya ene Oe $. v ptad ie paren Pan FRAO TORR aR 5 ROR ENR Hr PET See eee eer A el ort ae AN et ay ee, pig hamrugernaphhmetlniine eeh ines saan tein Se sen ate eee kirseene 7? Ve 9 eet Pe et at en ge ety ae par re Gt Sd icy rs oy parentage ee wtdinmanph- tense gh ayer eres IP AHS At 9 Reng hy ORNS: er wr ewe inie a eninaes iaaeeene santo é sneha ete ie av " pots ~ par et erates pee a ; ~ ui wy er “9 ee ths me Pues ™ : eetpeny? Sey pererers terpenes or perce at etl pean fe hee ban Ne’ erent tt eanet at tt vee ane ete Pee ed eieebetenenemmamates mennyusnrbsrshoe geereenRanreonesvenepastonye peiara oe : : ee ee ae : ¢ rs , ana ne ein. anos . > pavere rn uP tad ri ta Ca SP gig ‘ me Pi ; $ - a - teh nb term . mca ae lip sai eh ng Al So aatees ; - Schon wang nae he AP peta ene tata someone pare teh EN tS aly Die Vet yo ote ee ET we pa 2 J em CAPLAN ~ A nN SE acemen ores Per rr a ee ee et Pe : . ot a “ ethan, a “4 y iien2 02 teens ; ttl + ‘ oo - 7 Samad td way OPTS Se on one } und - - & Bebe er Oo ETRE Ene A re FE A tals t Na ON am atee eae TOP Ta M5 ws nianenitdaaiad "7 - 14 ae es A Mas 4 = Sadie ie preemee Tre ee ganeann Spe ‘ unpehed oad ¢ ‘ risen rr errr coe neat hs0b-8b0betcheaneel ~ : _ or ’ rer ee uniter *Oedigndlepniecast bona omannpmtnee renee aed hes. 7 res * pani pote rs a aaiaidians 2 n : + row atpewiahe ak f manty a+ pans mip at ecg hid gn aie Ma te nea * oe a> M a Fgh nh te =, 7 95 he gevdtns hepehenten: weed ee oe > anenll = euarne the See _ tae! we 6 sue edprgt—rtte ‘ i ao > aor. ping ~— rameter ati! ae = es . . ete, me hs. Pe ear ama tte a ee oe gmapreseen eseemar jc 8\"90.4 2 xs ume resamante Reber Ans oo eaten atyace inpenrctengaanad ieearatehepentaeare street tev ene y= nba rOay : oar rmanhesyameitelecnee teelete paconese satel park gine 90a y BAO esr ea page see nah Oi 0 - — < > y é dives : Soha pido oss Petiteie: bal fe = et eh hi ne + aga ibe hapte Manian” POE Teta ‘ x ee eae i peat) ' . “ ; — te I RT Ee Ne Rl ELIE ROME 4 9 pe D . ‘ : romp ina sane > ~ And Nth etl paar : : 4 : re : yorr H " : . “4 " = ? r ihtbesanhistink il bie eee “ ag . nae ' 4 8 shail erhneiar mee Ca insntpabean easbmrerkaeleasae hn etm reeetntPl wah ia pace renee ere a tia ta hl thigh tt ta na et ta 3 te Pn ; a7 Oe on eee aera - —— 7 - * abe . - 2 9 hee 00 sor’ ce 7 ~ A oe pei site at thes ial ie _ od very ~ . a. = eet _— . 7 > ee ee ey ae oe eee eee ee eee