(Wa w)) | REPAIR, EVALUATION, MAINTENANCE, AND (3) | REHABILITATION RESEARCH PROGRAM US Army Corps i] hah eas 81 eats of Engineers 1 TECHNICAL REPORT REMR-CO-3 CASE HISTORIES OF CORPS BREAKWATER AND JETTY STRUCTURES Report 5 & NORTH ATLANTIC DIVISION by Ernest R. Smith Coastal Engineering Research Center a DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers PO Box 631, Vicksburg, Mississippi 39181-0631 November 1988 Report 5 of a Series Approved For Public Release; Distribution Unlimited | Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY US Army Corps of Engineers Washington, DC 20314-1000 Under Work Unit 32278 and Work Unit 31269 The following two letters used as part of the number designating technical reports of research published under the Repair, Evaluation, Maintenance, and Rehabilitation (REMR) Research Program identify the problem area under which the report was prepared: Problem Area Problem Area cs Concrete and Steel Structures EM Electrical and Mechanical GT Geotechnical El Environmental Impacts HY Hydraulics OM Operations Management co Coastal Destroy this report when no longer needed. Do not return it to the originator. The findings in this report are not to be construed as an Official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized documents. The contents of this report are not to be used for advertising, publication, or promotional purposes. Citation of trade names does not constitute an official endorsement or approval of the use of such commercial products. COVER PHOTOS: TOP — Field Research Facility, Duck, North Carolina. BOTTOM — Photograph of Indian River Inlet jetties. Unclassified SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Exp. Date: Jun 30, 1986 Ja. REPORT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION 1b. RESTRICTIVE MARKINGS Unclassified 2a. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION AUTHORITY F 3. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY OF REPORT 2b. DECLASSIFICATION/ DOWNGRADING SCHEDULE Approved for public release, distribution unlimited 4. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) 5. MONITORING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER(S) Technical Report REMR-CO-3 6a. NAME OF PERFORMING ORGANIZATION 6b. OFFICE SYMBOL || 7a. NAME OF MONITORING ORGANIZATION USAEWES, Coastal Engineering (If applicable) Research Center 6c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 7b. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) PO Box 631 Vicksburg, MS 39181-0631 8a. NAME OF FUNDING/SPONSORING 8b. OFFICE SYMBOL 9. PROCUREMENT INSTRUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ORGANIZATION (if applicable) US Army Corps of Engineers 8c. ADDRESS (City, State, and ZIP Code) 10. SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERS PROGRAM PROJECT TASK WORK UNIT Washington, DC 20314-1000 ELEMENT NO. | NO NO. ACCESSION NO See reverse. 11. TITLE (Include Security Classification) Case Histories of Corps Breakwater and Jetty Structures; Report 5: North Atlantic Division 12. PERSONAL AUTHOR(S) Ernest R. Smith 13a. TYPE OF REPORT 13b. TIME COVERED 14. DATE OF REPORT (Year, Month, Day) |15. PAGE COUNT Report 5 of a Series | rrom Jun 85 toDec 86 November 1988 vUe 16. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION See reverse. 17. COSATI CODES 18. SUBJECT TERMS (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number) Breakwater REMR (Repair, Evaluation, aS | a | RN uecoucketcharmongunuts Maintenance, and Rehabilitation) Jetty Rubble-mound structures 19. ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse if necessary and identify by block number) This report is fifth in a series of case histories of US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) breakwater and jetty structures at nine Corps divisions. Chronological histories are presented for 58 breakwater and jetty structures located within the US Army Engineer Division, North Atlantic (NAD), which includes the New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Norfolk Districts. Presently, there are approximately 161,500 lin ft of breakwater and jetty structures managed by NAD. Structure cross sections of rubble-mound or stone-filled timber crib account for most of this total. Thirty-three of the project structures have been repaired since construction. Other construction materials that have been used include steel, dolosse, concrete cap, concrete block, and timber. 20. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY OF ABSTRACT 21. ABSTRACT SECURITY CLASSIFICATION [3 UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED =) SAME AS RPT. 1 otic USERS Unclassified i 22a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE INDIVIDUAL 22b. TELEPHONE (Include Area Code) | 22c. OFFICE SYMBOL DD FORM 1473, 84 MAR 83 APR edition may be used until exhausted. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE All other editions are obsolete Unclassified Unclassified SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE 10. SOURCE OF FUNDING NUMBERS (Continued). Work Unit 32278 and Work Unit 31269 16. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTATION (Continued). A report of the Coastal Problem Area of the Repair, Evaluation, Maintenance, and Rehabili- tation (REMR) Research Program. Available from National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA 22161. Unclassified wo EE EE eee SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE PREFACE This report was prepared as part of the Coastal Problem Area of the Repair, Evaluation, Maintenance, and Rehabilitation (REMR) Research Program. The work was carried out jointly under Work Unit 32278, "Rehabilitation of Rubble-Mound Structure Toes," of the REMR program and Work Unit 31269, "Sta- bility of Breakwaters," of the Civil Works Coastal Area Program. For the REMR Program, Coastal Problem Area Monitor is Mr. John H. Lockhart, Jr., Office, Chief of Engineers (OCE), US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps). REMR Program Manager is Mr. William F. McCleese of the US Army Engineer Waterways Experi- ment Station's (WES's) Structures Laboratory, and Coastal Problem Area Leader is Mr. D. D. Davidson of WES's Coastal Engineering Research Center (CERC). Messrs. John G. Housley and Lockhart are Technical Monitors of the Civil Works Coastal Area Program. This report is fifth in a series of case histories of Corps breakwater and jetty structures at nine Corps divisions. The case histories were written from information obtained from several sources (where available), including inspection correspondence, design memorandums, survey reports, and annual re- ports to the Chief of Engineers. Unless otherwise noted, any changes in pro- totype structures subsequent to 1985 are not included. This work was conducted at WES during the period June 1985 to December 1986 under general direction of Dr. James R. Houston, Chief, CERC, and Mr. Charles C. Calhoun, Jr., Assistant Chief, CERC; and under direct supervi- sion of Mr. C. Eugene Chatham, Jr., Chief, Wave Dynamics Division (CW), and Mr. D. D. Davidson, Chief, Wave Research Branch (CW-R). This report was pre- pared by Mr. Ernest R. Smith, Hydraulic Engineer, Wave Processes Branch (CW-P). Messrs. John P. Ahrens, Peter J. Grace, John M. Heggins, and Cornelius Lewis, CW-R, and Frances E. Sargent, CW-P, visited project sites and gathered information. Mr. Marvin G. Mize, CW-P, drafted figures, and Ms. Shirley A. J. Hanshaw, Information Products Division, Information Tech- nology Laboratory, edited this report. Commander and Director of WES during publication of this report was COL Dwayne G. Lee, EN. Technical Director was Dr. Robert W. Whalin. CONTENTS PREBACERrieletsve crctareyclelcteketeteratololencroichorsiensMele) iefolaehenot ele eleleorakel on McheNeL el emoued: CONVERSION FACTORS, NON-SI TO (SI) METRIC UNITS OF MEASUREMENT PART I: UAH KOU G ooacocqc6G00060000000000000000000000000 Backgrounders crrctercchedarerKererciehehenst et emeitoiel tekelerelel el teu eNoNotel oven cMevomiey AMINO s6ocooodo0oobUbO doo DOOD OC OODDOODD OOOO OOO OOOODDDON PART II: SUMMARY OF CORPS BREAKWATER AND JETTY STRUCTURES IN NAD ecoceoesce ee eee CONVERSION FACTORS, NON-SI TO SI (METRIC) UNITS OF MEASUREMENT Non-SI customary units of measurement used in this report can be converted to SI (metric) units as follows: Multiply By cubic yards 0.76455549 feet 0.3048 inches 2.54 miles (US statute) 1.609347 pounds (force) 4.448222 square feet 0.09290204 tons (2,000 lb force) 8896 . 443353 To obtain cubic metres metres centimetres kilometres newtons square metres newtons CASE HISTORIES OF CORPS BREAKWATER AND JETTY STRUCTURES NORTH ATLANTIC DIVISION PART I: INTRODUCTION Background 1. The US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is responsible for a wide vari- ety of coastal structures located on the Atlantic, Pacific, and gulf coasts, the Great Lakes, the Hawaiian Islands, other islands, and inland waterways. Coastal improvements such as breakwaters or jetties are necessary where safe harboring or passage of shipping is required. These structures are contin- uously subjected to wave and current forces, and they are usually constructed on top of movable-bed materials. Under these conditions structural deteriora- tion can occur and, at some point, maintenance is required if the structure fails to serve the existing needs of the project. Some of these projects have been maintained for 150 years or more. Methods of construction (and repair) have varied significantly during this time, due principally to a better under- standing of coastal processes, availability of construction materials, existing wave climates, regional construction practices, and economic considerations. Purpose 2. The purposes of this report are to lend insight into the scope, magni- tude, and history of coastal breakwaters and jetties under Corps jurisdiction; determine their maintenance and repair history; determine their methods of construction; make this information available to Corps personnel; and address objectives of the Repair, Evaluation, Maintenance, and Rehabilitation (REMR) research program. To do this, case histories of Corps breakwater and jetty structures have been developed to quantify past and present problem areas (if any), to take steps to rectify these problems, and to subsequently evaluate the remedial measures. General design guidance can be obtained from those solu- tions that have been most successful. Information in this report should be of particular value to Corps personnel in the US Army Engineer Division, North Atlantic (NAD), and its coastal districts and possibly to non-Corps personnel. Where adequate solutions are lacking or where specific guidance is needed, further research will be conducted to address these problems (e.g. general armor stability, toe protection, localized damage, use of dissimilar armor, wave runup and overtopping). PART II: SUMMARY OF CORPS BREAKWATER AND JETTY STRUCTURES IN NAD 3. NAD has 58 projects which contain breakwater and/or jetty structures that are located in four coastal districts as follows: New York (NAN), 21; Philadelphia (NAP), 17; Baltimore (NAB), 16; and Norfolk (NAO), 4. Case histories for these structures are included in Tables 1-58 which are ordered according to the preceding districts and coastal location. Twelve of the projects are located in an ocean environment, and the remainder are situated in bays, sounds, or rivers. Overall, there are approximately 161,500 lin ft* of breakwaters (22.6 percent) and jetties (77.4 percent). Most of the struc- tures' cross sections are rubble mound (73.1 percent) or stone-filled timber crib (10.4 percent). Other construction materials that have been used include steel (Wilmington Harbor and Indian River Inlet), dolosse (Manasquan Inlet), concrete cap (Manasquan Inlet and Ocean City Inlet), concrete block (Cold Spring Inlet), and timber (Double Creek, Little Wicomico River, and Urbanna Creek). Thirty-three of the project structures have been repaired since construction. 4, Figures 1 through 4 are maps of NAN, NAP, NAB, AND NAO, respectively, showing project locations. Pertinent summary information on each project is presented in the following listing. * & table of factors for converting non-SI units of measurement to SI (metric) units is presented on page 3. ri < °) a in] 2) 3 ar | | ORDONS LANDING PLATTSBURGH HARBOR NEW YORK DISTRICT BOUNDARIES i 2 y) rf MASSACHUSETTS ———_— YOSYVH : YOsYVH * MONLIL LWW oy DELAWARE GOSHEN BAY CREEK CAPE MAY HARBOR TO DELAWARE BAY oy ROOSEVELT > \A\INCET BALTIMORE DISTRICT BOUNDARY Ti : es g \; PHILADELPHIA LE \ 4 .. DISTRICT : )): BOUNDARY , MANASQUANY.¢3 INLET DOUBLE « CREEK—> SCALE OF MILES. Figure 2. NAP breakwater and jetty project locations BOUNDARY —>\ PENNSYLVANIA DISTRICT h ye OCEAN CITY INLET AQ AYSAIN JYVJONOHL OIG. a NS ONV 3A09 HOLIMI~ ew N aawouous usdan i : RS = ss == tS = SJPIOQHSILNUN es y JANIS SHOHSILNYN or JAKWAIS 1 43AIN SOHOILNWN Ue 7 > 7. OBYVH 3NNOBIVID-H“7 BACK CREEK—

x v eS C) s . BYRAM at PT. & 2 * @ 6 > o os Q ecALE OF PERT . t00 Figure 9. Port Chester Harbor, New York 19 Date(s) 1906 1967 1969 1986 Table 6 Larchmont Harbor Breakwater Larchmont, New York New York District Construction and Rehabilitation History Construction was completed on a 1,440-ft-long stone breakwater, (Fig- ure 10). Crest elevation was +10.0 ft mlw, crown width was 5.0 ft, and side slopes were 1:1. Stone sizes 8.0 to 10.0 tons were placed in random fashion. Initial construction costs were $71,065. A survey of the breakwater indicated the entire length was below design elevation and varied from +4.0 to +8.0 ft mlw. A localized depression of +2.0 ft mlw was located approximately 1,300 ft from the shoreward end. The breakwater was submerged during high tides, which created danger areas and was only partially effective as a barrier to storm waves. The structure had no breaks and was considered stable. _The entire breakwater was rehabilitated by adding 8.0- to 10.0-ton stone in pell mell fashion to raise the elevation up to original design. Crown width remained 5.0 ft, and side slopes were 1V:1.5H. Cost of rehabilitation was $215,500. A 12.5-ft, 4.9-sec design wave was used. No further repair or maintenance information has been found. 20 Vi \ \ / ° =e 4 \ ¥ pevancey.:// say octancer J | °F if FZ (SSNS hee wo SS ah V\ woarn ceose v = — ‘. s “ F xy eH: i. MQ EOGE WATER PT. Oy §sourw Levee A Oo HURON ROCK (REMOVED) ep mene PT. BREAKWATER Ligar Soavaress Rock & eno ear Figure 10. Larchmont Harbor, New York 21 Table 7 Glen Cove Breakwater Glen Cove, New York New York District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1906 A 1,465-ft-long stone breakwater was completed to provide shelter to anchorage (Figure 11). Crest elevation was +10.4 ft mlw, crown width was 5.0 ft, and side slopes were 1:1. Stone sizes of 1,500 lb to 2.0 ton were placed in pell mell fashion. Cost of initial con- struction was $71,830. 1964 A survey of the breakwater revealed that the offshore portion had deteriorated and the outer half had settled 3.0 ft. Crest elevation varied from +5.0 to +10.4 ft mlw, and side slopes varied from 1:1 to 1V:2H. Stones were displaced due to undersized stone. Over 50 per- cent of the breakwater was submerged at high tide. The breakwater was considered stable with no breach along the entire length. 1986 No further repair or maintenance information has been found. The project has been deauthorized. 22 [RED SPRING PT. SCALE OF FEET Figure 11. Glen Cove Harbor, New York 23 Date(s) 1871 1872 1875 1877 1878 1879 1881 1882 1883 1891 1908 1964 1986 Table 8 Port Jefferson Jetties Port Jefferson, New York New York District Construction and Rehabilitation History A 600-ft-long riprap jetty was constructed east of the harbor en- trance to prevent shoaling in the channel. Crest elevation was +6.5 ft mlw. The jetty was extended to 1,050 ft, maintaining the same crest elevation. A 475-ft-long riprap jetty was built west of the harbor using 3,933 tons of stone (Figure 12). Crest elevation was +11.0 ft mlw. The east jetty was extended 50 ft seaward, and the entire jetty was raised to +5.0 ft high water (hw). The west jetty was extended 450 ft with a crest elevation of +2.0 ft mlw, except the seaward end was +11.0 ft mlw. The east jetty was extended 70 ft using 1,437 tons of stone. Stone was placed on both jetties. The east jetty was extended 120 ft using 2,020 tons of stone. The west jetty was extended to 940 ft. Crest elevation of the jetty was +11.0 ft mlw over the shoreward 550 ft and +2.0 ft mlw seaward. The middle of the +2.0 ft mlw section was +11.0 ft mlw, and the sea- ard end was +14.0 ft mlw. Crown width was 4.0 ft at the seaward 250 ft, and side slopes were 1:1. The east jetty was extended to 1,390 ft at +5.0 ft hw, with a 4.0-ft crown width. The total cost of the jetties since 1871 was $79,000. The east jetty was repaired over 600 ft with 1,464 tons of stone. The east jetty was extended to 1,550 ft (Figure 12). A survey indicated the jetties were in poor condition. No further repair or maintenance information has been found. 24 LONG (SLANOD SOUND i MT_MISERY PT. Bran, wEST JETTY x oO Ww 2 omy SELLE TERRE yy z= R 7) . a4 <2) <) RY : =: > \. fo) Lr, fo) ro) > Ve « r a Le 4 7) ty PORT JEFFERSON SCALE OF FEET Figure 12. Port Jefferson Harbor, New York 25 Table 9 Mattituck Harbor Jetties Mattituck, New York New York District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1906 Two parallel jetties were constructed 400 ft apart at the harbor entrance. Lengths were 775 ft (east (Figure 13)), and 680 ft (west). The estimated cost of construction was $40,000. 1910 The landward 680 ft of the east jetty and 485 ft of the west jetty were repaired and made sand tight at a cost of $6,158. Seaward por- tions of the jetties were in need of repair and sand tightening. 1938 The west jetty was extended to 930 ft (Figure 13). The jetties were considered to be in good condition. 1975 Both jetties were repaired using $10,670 tons of stone. The cost of repairs was $385,000. 1986 No further repair or maintenance information has been found. 26 SCALE OF FEET Figure 13. Mattituck Harbor, New York ail Table 10 Greenport Harbor Breakwater Greenport, New York New York District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation Histor 1883 A 1,570-ft-long breakwater was constructed to provide harbor protec- tion from east and northeast storms (Figure 14). Crest elevation was +3.0 ft hw and allowed for 1.0-ft expected settlement. Crown width was 5.0 ft, and side slopes were 1:1. The estimated cost of con- struction was $22,000. 1986 No further repair or maintenance information has been found. Figure 14. Greenport Harbor, New York 28 Date(s) 1908 1962 1963 1986 Table 11 Sag Harbor Breakwater, Sag Harbor, New York New York District Construction and Rehabilitation History A two-section breakwater was constructed of stone to provide harbor protection (Figure 15). The total length of the breakwater was 3,180 ft. The inshore section extended 1,330 ft north-northwest from Conklin Point. The offshore and inshore sections overlapped and were separated by 100 ft. The offshore section extended 1,850 ft west- northwest. Crest elevations were +7.5 ft mlw, crown width was 5.0 ft, and side slopes were 1:1. The cost of construction was $59,800. Surveys indicated the breakwater had settled 0.5 to 1.0 ft for con- siderable lengths. The breakwater was considered stable. Repairs were made using 1,429 tons of stone at a cost of $15,150. No further repair or maintenance information has been found. SHELTER /SLAND SOUND FLOOD £88 — NORTH HAVEN PENINSULA SAG HARBOR COVE Figure 15. Sag Harbor, New York 2s) Date(s) 1926 1942 1967 1968 1986 Table 12 Lake Montauk Jetties Star Island, New York New York District Construction and Rehabilitation History Private interests constructed jetties east and west of the lake en- trance. The east jetty was 750 ft long (Figure 16), and the west jetty was 981 ft long. Crest elevations were +6.0 ft and +8.0 ft mean low water (mlw) west and +8.0 ft mlw east. Crown width varied from 5.0 to 6.0 ft, and the side slopes were 1V:1.5H. One- to 4,0-ton stone was used and placed in random fashion. The west jetty was extended 231 ft shoreward at the request of the Department of the Navy using $82,738 of Navy funds (Figure 16). Crest elevation of the extension was +8.0 ft mlw, crown width was 6.0 ft, and side slopes were 1V:1.5H. Cover stone used was 4.0 to 6.0 tons, and core stone was 8.0 to 6,000 lb. A survey indicated the jetty was in poor condition. Proposals were made to repair and extend the jetties using a design wave of WoO) sae and 5.8 sec. The jetties were repaired, and the east jetty was extended 350 ft. The cost of repairs and the extension was $526,600, and 18,400 tons of stone were used. No further repair or maintenance information has been found. 30 BLOCK 1/SLANDB SOUND LAKE MONTAUK HARBOR SCALE OF FEET 300 Figure 16. Lake Montauk Harbor, New York 31 Date(s) 1953 1954 1956 1982 1985 Table 13 Shinnecock Inlet Jetties Tiana Beach and Hampton Beach, New York New York District Construction and Rehabilitation History Local interests constructed two jetties for inlet stabilization at lengths of 1,363 ft east (Figure 17) and 850 ft west. The cost of construction was $846,210 east and $376,000 west. The design geome- try of both jetties consisted of +9.0-ft mlw crest elevations, 12.0- ft crown widths, and 1V:1.5H side slopes. The jetties were con- structed of one layer capstone, 4.0- to 10-ton stone on the landward 1,163 ft of the east jetty, and 6.0- to 12-ton stone elsewhere. Core stone used on the east jetty was 5.0 lb to 1.0 ton on the land- ward 1,163 ft and 5.0 lb to 2.0 tons elsewhere. Core stone used on the west jetty was 50 lb to 1.0 ton. A 2.0-ft-thick blanket and apron stone were placed using 5.0- to 500-1b stone. Local interests extended the west jetty 96 ft (Figure 17) at a cost of $166,230. The extension was built at the same elevation and width as the original jetty. Side slopes were 1V:2H. Capstone was 6.0 to 12 tons, covering 10-lb to 2.0-ton core stone resting on a 2.0-ft- thick blanket and apron, consisting of 50- to 500-1b stone. A survey revealed that the east jetty had suffered severe damage. Capstones and slope stones had slipped and were disarranged in nu- merous spots. Core stones were washed out in several places. Cap- stones and core stones were washed out in four locations totaling 150 ft. The outer 250 ft of the jetty was partly washed out. Beach and dunes adjacent to the jetty eroded, and waves rode over the dunes and flanked the jetty. The west jetty was in fair condition with minor slips and disarrangement in five spots. The inlet was ina shoal condition. Most of the damage was due to a hurricane in 1954. The west jetty was reconstructed by resetting cap stones to original design geometry over 170 ft. A 1,470-ft-long pile crib revetment on the north end of the west jetty was replaced by a rubble-mound jetty. (Figure 18). A survey revealed that the reconstructed portion of the west jetty was in good condition. The seaward 200 ft of the west jetty had unraveled and capstones were scattered. The west jetty head had not maintained design configuration. Stones on the inlet side of the east jetty had sloughed in some sections, but stones on the beach Side had retained their original position. Two areas on the northern end were completely deteriorated. Erosion of sand caused undermining of the east jetty with continual loss of sand undermining it further. (Continued) 32 DAL B16 2 bts PROJECT DEPTH PROJECT OEPTH DATUM PLANES (M.L.W) (OCEAN SIDE)°15 FT. BELOW MSL. (M.L.w) (BAY SIDE) °O2 FT BELOW MSL. SCALE OF FEET ie} 800 800 —eEE————E ES new WORK REMAINING TO BE DONE Figure 17. Shinnecock Inlet, New York 33 an NEW JETTY CONSTRUCTED ORIGINAL CAP STONE 5 TO 9 TONS PILE CRIB REVET MENT- NON- FUNCTIONAL REVETMENT SECTION DUNE RO JETTY RECONSTRUCTED P STONES ESET COMPLETE WASHOUTS PARTIAL Af WASHOUTS Tees GAPS IN STONES Be NO INTERLOCKING HW LINE 1953 UNRAVELING TO JETTY STONES SLOPED STONE SLOUGHING, TOP OF JETTY SETTLEMENT WEST JETTY nner SAND LOSS BEHIND f: EXISTING CONDITIONS SHOALING . MEAN HIGH WATER LINE. ... ADJACENT ft ney TO JETTY = STONE SETTLEMENT, GAPS EVIDENT ATLANTIC OCEAN | Y| A S UNRAVELED Yj Lo} COMPLETELY EAST JETTY NOT TO SCALE Figure 18. 1982 reconstruction of west jetty and 1985 existing conditions of east jetty, Shinnecock Inlet 34 Date(s) 1985 (Cont. ) 1986 Table 13 (Concluded) Construction and Rehabilitation History There were areas of partial washouts of stone, settlement, and non- interlocking capstones. The seaward 300 ft was completely unraveled, with all stones scattered (Figure 18). It was determined that the jetties had served their function of inlet stabilization and they were not leaking significant amounts of sand. Plans call for rehabilitation of the jetties. The east jetty will need new capstones and core stones where there are complete washouts, approximately 450 ft. Original stones will be removed and reset where settlement and sloughing has occurred, approximately 700 ft. The 300-ft east jetty head section will be completely rebuilt with new and original stone. A blanket will be placed for scour protec- tion. A 5.0-ft-thick blanket using 1,000-lb stone will be laid on the existing bottom to prevent additional scouring of the west jetty toe. New capstone and core stone are needed to supplement the dis- placed stones of the west jetty head. The section will be rebuilt using existing stone but will consist of two layers of armor stone. 35 Date(s) 1953 1954 1956 1983 1986 Table 14 Moriches Inlet Jetties Great South Beach and Pikes Beach, New York New York District Construction and Rehabilitation History Construction of two jetties by local interests was completed at lengths of 750 ft east and 1,420 ft west. Elevations were +9.0 ft mlw, crown widths were 12.0 ft, and side slopes were 1V:1.5H. One layer of capstone was placed over core stone, which rested on a 2-ft-thick blanket. Stone sizes used on the east jetty were 4.0- to 10.0-ton capstone and 5.0-lb to 1.0-ton core stone on the shoreward 580 ft, and 6.0- to 12-ton capstone and 5.0-lb to 2.0-ton core stone on the remainder of the jetty. The west jetty consisted of 2.0- to 6.0-ton capstone and 10-lb to 1,000-lb core stone on the shoreward 1,280 ft and 6.0- to 12-ton capstone and 10-lb to 1.0-ton core stone elsewhere. Blanket and apron stone was 5.0 to 500 lb and 10 1b to 500 lb on the east and west jetties, respectively. Cost was $327,630 for the east jetty and $420,210 for the west jetty, all non-Federal funds. Local interests extended the jetties to 841 ft east and 1,461 ft west (Figure 19) using 6.0- to 12.0-ton capstone at 1V:2H side slopes. Core stone used was 15 lb to 5.0 ton, east jetty, and 10 1b to 2.0 tons west jetty. A 2.0-ft-thick blanket and apron was placed using 15- to 500-lb stone. Jetty ends were approximately 800 ft apart. Cost was $194,290 east and $142,260 west. An inspection of the jetties was conducted. Stone on the inlet side of both jetties had slipped at numerous locations. Slope stones and capstones had unraveled at the outer end of the east jetty. Approxi- mately 300 ft of the west jetty had settled 2.0 to 3.0 ft. The jetties had undergone severe wave attack since their construction, and most of the damage was attributed to the hurricane of August 31, 1954. A survey indicated the jetties were in a good, stable condition. The jetties had settled approximately 2.0 ft over 65 ft on the east jetty and 130 ft on the west jetty. The jetties did not meet Corps of Engineers standards for armor stone layer thickness, weight, or ele- vation, and it was determined that it would be more economical to maintain the jetties on an annual basis than by rehabilitation. Potential damage was anticipated to increase. No further repair or maintenance information has been found. 36 f INLET _ ISLAND PROJECT DEPTH DATUM PLANES Q4.L.w) (OCEAN SIDE)° 1.7 FT BELOW MS.L. (M.LW) BAY SOE) °O4 FT. BELOW MSL = [new work remains To 8 CONE Figure 19. Moriches Inlet, New York S/ Date(s) 1892 1927 1935 1962- 1963 1986 Table 15 Browns Creek Jetties Sayville, New York New York District Construction and Rehabilitation History Two riprap jetties were constructed east and west of the creek en- trance. The east jetty was 448 ft long, and the west jetty was 492 ft long (Figure 20). Crest elevations were +1.0 ft hw, crown width was 3.0 ft, and side slopes were 1:1. The minimum stone used was 500 1b. The west jetty was repaired and extended 208 ft (Figure 20). Eleva- tion of the extension was +3.0 ft hw. Nine hundred eighty one cubic yards of rock was used for repair and extension. The outer 213 ft of the west jetty was repaired. Minimum capstone and slope stone was 2.0 tons, and core stone was 15 lb to 1.5 tons. The crest elevation was raised over the entire jetty to +4.0 ft mlw, crown width was 4.0 ft, and side slopes were 1V:1.5H. A survey indicated the jetties were deteriorated. Almost all stones were displaced on the west jetty, and there were numerous openings in the structure. Most of the stones were shifted out of place on the east jetty. Almost half of the jetty was breached and was not visi- ble at mean low water. The jetties were rehabilitated over the en- tire lengths in 1963 using 4,000 tons of stone at a cost of $71,000. Crest elevations were +4.0 ft mlw, crown width was 6.0 ft, and side slopes were 1V:1.5H (Figure 20). Three-ton cap and slope stone, and 15-1b to 1.5-ton core stone was used. The design wave was 5.0 sec, 0) te. No further repair or maintenance information has been found. The project has been deauthorized. 38 prownd River Road TOWN DOCK (new) RivER ROAD cI |): oo ort timit f oF GFT PRovect? H |b | i | | im © EAST JETTY west —}— 700’ DEPTH = SS ace (SVS ~ =x PROJECT SCALE OF FEET ° 400 400 —S—S SSS Figure 20. Browns Creek, New York 39 Table 16 Fire Island Jetty Democrat Point, New York New York District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1941 A 4,950-ft jetty was constructed to stabilize the inlet (Figure 21). Crest elevation was +8.0 ft mlw, crown width was 12.0 ft, and side slopes were 1V:2H. The jetty rested on a 3-ft-thick blanket which extended 50 ft seaward of the jetty toe. 1950 A survey indicated the sand trapping capacity of the jetty was reached, and the jetty was in fair condition. 1986 No further repair or maintenance information has been found. STATE < 804T CHANNEL ——= 1SLANO DEMOCRAT ROBERT MOSES STATE PARK DATUM PLANES MLW, (AT DEMOCRAT PORT - OCEAN G:DE) = 20 FT. BELOW MSL MLW. (AT DEMOCRAT PONTT-ugT GIDE) = 1.2 FT. BELOW MSL Figure 21. Fire Island Inlet, New York 40 Date(s) Table 17 Jones Inlet Jetty Jones Beach State Park, New York New York District Construction and Rehabilitation History 1959 1962 1985 1986 A 5,200-ft-long jetty was constructed to provide inlet stabilization, and a sand barrier was constructed to prevent shoaling of the inlet (Figure 22). The jetty was constructed in four sections. The land- ward section (Section 1) was 1,150 ft in length and had a crown width of 6.0 ft and side slopes of 1V:1.5H. Minimum capstone sizes were 5.0 tons, and core stone was 10 lb to 3.0 tons. Section 2 was 3,650 ft long and had a crown width of 8.0 ft and side slopes of 1V:2H, except the shoreward 1,850 ft on the western side, which was 1V:1.5H. Minimum capstone used was 5.0 tons, and core stone was 15 lb to 4.0 tons. Section 3 was 350 ft long and had a crown width of 12.0 ft and side slopes of 1V:2H. Capstone used was 8.0 ton mini- mum, and core stone was 15 lb to 5.0 ton. Section 4, the most sea- ward section, was 50 ft and had a crown width of 15 ft and side slopes of 1V:2.5H. Stone sizes were the same as those in Section 3. All crest elevations were +9.0 ft mlw. The jetty rested on a 2.0-ft- thick blanket that extended 20 ft west from the base of Sections 1 and 2 and extended 30 ft from both sides of the base of Section 3, except for 125 ft on the seaward west side. A 2.0-ft-thick apron extended 100 ft from the toe and curved to intersect the blanket in Section 3. The useful life of the jetty was expected to be 20 years. The Middle Atlantic coastal storm of 6-8 March 1962 damaged the jetty. The outer 200 ft was raveled and broken down to the high water level. A second layer of capstone was added to the outer 120 ft to restore the original design. The adjacent 1,080 ft shore- ward was repaired by replacing armor stone and by adding stone. Armor stone was replaced on the adjacent 900 ft shoreward. The jetty had nearly reached impoundment. Sand was bypassing the jetty, mostly through large voids at the jetty-shoreline intersec- tion. The apron had settled approximately 7.0 ft at the seaward end due to sand loss through voids in the apron. No further repair or maintenance information has been found. 44 MIDDLE BAY aN NSS ON- FEDERAL Coane (Sy Eu ya ADOW ME yy cDeRaL Peostct ISLAND 4 Welkeaet ae arte et =H ee ean bead uuu HROINT LOCKOUT, ee R y S Figure 22. Jones Inlet, New York 42 Date(s) 1934 1935 1941 1946 1963 1986 Table 18 East Rockaway (Debs) Inlet Jetty Long Beach, New York New York District Construction and Rehabilitation History A 3,750-ft-long jetty was constructed on the east side of the inlet for stabilization (Figure 23). The jetty was constructed in three sections with lengths of 1,400 ft, 1,400 ft, and 950 ft, landward to seaward, respectively. The design geometry for each section was: Section 1: Crest elevation of +8.0 ft mlw, 6.0-ft crown width, 1:1 side slopes, and one layer of cover and capstone. Section 2: Crest elevation of +8.0 ft mlw, 8.0-ft crown width, 1:1 side slopes, and one layer of cover and capstone. Section 3: Crest elevation of +10.0 ft mlw, 15.0-ft crown width, 1V:1.5H side slopes, and one layer cover and capstone. The jetty rested on a 1.0-ft-thick blanket and a 1.0-ft-thick apron which extended seaward of the toe 500 ft. A jetty was to be built west of the inlet if necessary. Repairs were made to the jetty beginning 2,500 ft from the landward end, and extending seaward 250 ft. The cost of repairs was $14,426, and 1,926 tons of stone were used. Repairs were made by rearranging 212 tons of stone on the seaward 610 ft at a cost of $6,000. An additional 375 tons were placed on the east side of the seaward end at a cost of $1,670. Twenty-four hundred tons of stone were placed on the jetty at a cost of $78,000. The jetty was considered to be in good condition. Repairs were made using 800 tons of stone at a cost of $18,411, and the structure was in good condition with the exception of minor repairs. No further repair or maintenance information is available on the east jetty. The west jetty has not been built. The project has been deauthorized. 43 f° ATLANTIC BEAGH PROJECT EAST JETTY Ae Tee M AN ETE (aC OF Cue Ane SCALE OF FEET 600 DaTuUM (M4. Ww) = 210 FT. BELOW M.S. Figure 23. East Rockway (Debs) Inlet, New York 4y Table 19 Jamaica Bay Jetty, Rockaway Point, New York New York District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1933 A jetty was constructed east of the bay entrance, 8,400 ft long, for channel protection (Figure 24). Plans called for construction of a west jetty. 1949 A survey of the jetty stated it was in fair condition. 1953 Repairs were made to 225 ft of the jetty using 580 tons of stone at a cost of $14,088. 1963 The jetty was rehabilitated to project dimensions. 1986 No further repair or maintenance information is available on the east jetty. The west jetty has not been constructed. BERGEN BEACH OS BO © ff Gb % — i] - ns at o i 5, “C40 y CPt ‘ay, LJ went Tan ROCKAWAY INLET FORT TILOEN EAST JETTY iD geo ATLANTIC OCEAN CHANBEL Figure 24. Jamaica Bay, New York 45 Table 20 Sandy Hook Bay Breakwater Atlantic Highlands, New Jersey New York District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1940 A 4,000-ft-long rubble-mound breakwater was completed (Figure 25). The breakwater extended east from the New Jersey Central Railroad steamboat dock. The cost of construction for the breakwater was $239,600, of which $158,334 were federal funds. A total of 93,548 tons of stone was used. 1986 No further repair or maintenance information has been found. " S\SPERMACETI cove ATLANTIC HIGHLANDS Figure 25. Sandy Hook Bay, New Jersey 46 Table 21 Cheesequake Creek Jetties, Morgan, New Jersey New York District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1883 Two parallel jetties were constructed 200 ft apart for channel pro- tection. Lengths were 925 ft east and 995 ft west (Figure 26). 1986 No further repair or maintenance information is available. The project has been deauthorized. ALON Ep) FEN le \ y. PROJECT CEPT Be 3st 0 [Nonovesto Sé5 PILE Diae FORMER WHTEREAD DOC. veoregam iw PeDERaL prosacT SCALE OF FEET \ ° 1000 eon Figure 26. Cheesequake Creek, New Jersey 47 Table 22 Neshaminy State Park Jetty Neshaminy State Park, Pennsylvania Philadelphia District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation Histor 1968 1986 A 230-ft-long rubble-mound groin was built but has served as a jetty for channel control (Figure 27). No further repair or maintenance information has been found. 2 Dr Ses 2 = \ Yee SSS Sea Se \- S 32325255 N 2 Sa eS, BUCKS —— COUNTY —_ a =v. a op s) Ayal ™m z NESHAMINY STATE PARK HARBOR Li eee SUES cauuy R ave DELAWARE ie SCALE OF FEET 400 9 800 Figure 27. Neshaminy State Park Harbor, Pennsylvania 48 Date(s) 1907 1912- 1913 1918 1962 1963 1964 1986 Table 23 Mantua Creek Jetties Paulsboro, New Jersey Philadelphia District Construction and Rehabilitation History Two jetties were constructed to provide channel protection. Lengths were 754 ft and 580 ft east and west, respectively. The jetties were constructed of stone-filled timber cribs, with mat brush placed to support the stone (Figure 28). Top width and elevation were 12.0 ft and +8.0 ft mlw, respectively, for each jetty. The east jetty was extended to 1,577 ft, and the west jetty was extended to 1,456 ft (Figure 28). Repairs were made by the addition of stone. An investigation of the jetties revealed the jetties had settled an average of 2.0 ft. Approximately 100 ft of the offshore end of the east jetty had deteriorated, with most of the pilings gone, and stone had fallen out to below the waterline. Most of the walings had deteriorated and were missing. Piles were missing at intermediate locations along the jetties, but there was no significant loss of stone at those locations. Piles that remained were in good condition. The jetties were rehabilitated at a cost of $136,895. A new row of piles was placed over approximately 100 ft at the offshore ends. Piles were placed 7.5 ft on either side of the center line of the jetties. Corestone was dumped between the piles to an elevation of +8.0 ft mlw (Figure 29). Missing piles were replaced, and new wales were provided along the remainder of the jetties. One row of cap- stone was placed on the inner sides of both cribs on top of the existing stone to +8.0 ft mlw. Core stone was filled between the capstones in the center of the jetties to +8.0 ft mlw (Figure 29). Crown width was 16.0 ft at the offshore ends and 12.0 ft on the re- mainder of the jetty. Design wave height was 4.2 ft. Repairs were made to the seaward end of the east jetty at a cost of $4,864. The Corps was reimbursed later for this work. No further repair or maintenance information has been found. 49 Grasset; Chemical Co. Paulsboro WS wiGuwary’ 7X BRIDGE (ORAM) Strathmann Sand @ Grove! Co. AMIGHWAY GLOUCESTER COUNTY BRIOGE Porters Lae Upstream limit of Federal Project ‘F.R_BRIOGE (FIXED) pA Mount Royal (@ é palsies grid? (FIXED) ul qari Cooks Landing ——Y me 0" EL+80 | £ wh as WALES 8x10" 10" WALES 8 xI2" TYPICAL CROSS SECTION 5000 ie) 5000 Figure 28. Mantua Creek, New Jersey 50 €961 ‘satqqef yooug enqueW Jo uOTIeITTIGQeYysy “62 ouNdTyY NOILVA3 13 NOILD3S 3YOHSIIO ay > MIN SY31LN39 0-2 NO 31d GOOM’, 2! 51 08+ 13 SNO1SdV9 SNO1S 3409 Date(s) 1922 1986 Table 24 Raccoon Creek Jetty Bridgeport, New Jersey Philadelphia District Construction and Rehabilitation History A 950-ft-long timber pile, brush, and stone jetty was constructed south of the entrance to provide channel protection (Figure 30). The cost of construction was $29,159. No further repair or maintenance information has been found. Bridgeport Ae Ia aA yous! 19 mea to Camden —————=> aE ry GLOUCESTER COUNTY Figure 30. Racoon Creek, New Jersey 52 Table 25 Wilmington Harbor Jetties Wilmington, Delaware Philadelphia District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1883 A 1,740-ft-long curved stone-filled pile and timber crib jetty was constructed north of the Christina River mouth. 1884 The north jetty was raised 4.0 ft to a height above high water (no information on exact height). 1900 The north jetty was repaired and extended 313 ft. A terminal crib was also constructed. The total length of the north jetty was 2,150 ft. Jetties were constructed on the south side of the Christina River and at the mouth of the Brandywine River. The length of the south Christina River jetty was 1,515 ft and was built of pile and stone. A cross dike was built to connect the inner end of the jetty to the shore at high water. The Brandywine River jetty was V-shaped and was built of stone-filled pile and timber crib. The total length of this jetty was 690 ft, 430 ft on the Brandywine River side and 260 ft on the Christina River side (Figure 31). 1905 Repairs were made to the Brandywine River jetty and the north Christina River jetty. New wales were put on the Brandywine jetty, and face timber was replaced on the north Christina jetty. Stone was replaced where needed on both jetties. 1916 Repairs were made to the north Christina River jetty. Broken timber and piling was replaced with new material. Fender piles were placed along the channel face, and the interior of the crib was filled with stone where settling had occurred along the entire length of the jetty. 1925 The south jetty was removed, and a new jetty was to be built south of the Christina River. 1931 Approximately 1,200 ft of the north jetty was removed to improve the channel regime. The total length of the north jetty was 950 ft (Fig- ure 31). 1936 A new jetty was completed south of the Christina River mouth. The jetty was 2,300 ft long (Figure 31) and consisted of 1,352 lin ft of steel sheet-pile wall, buttressed with 100-ft timber piles 12 ft on center, a 948-ft outboard section consisting of twelve 25.5-ft- diameter steel sheet-pile cells, and one 30.5-ft-diameter terminal cell with twelve 51-ft interconnecting fences. Crest elevation was +10 ft Corps of Engineers Datum (2.9 ft below mean sea level, 1929). The landward end of the jetty was connected to shore by a 120-ft steel sheet-pile anchor wall. The cost of construction was $205,000. (Continued) 53 Table 25 (Concluded) Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1937- Damages to the Christina south jetty, caused by ships colliding 1939, with it, were repaired each of these years at a total cost 1948 of $90,000. 1961 The landward 500 ft of the Christina south jetty was removed to ac- commodate marine terminal expansion. The total length of the jetty was 1,800 ft. 1962 275 ft of buttressed steel sheet-pile wall failed during an extremely low tide and was eventually repaired. 1985 The Christina south jetty is in good condition. NEW CASTLE COUNTY oo (gascune) BS ot I es U.S.Gour Wee SCALE OF FEET Figure 31. Wilmington Harbor, Delaware 54 Table 26 Delaware River and Chesapeake Bay Canal Jetties Reedy Point, Delaware Philadelphia District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1903 Construction of two rubble-mound jetties, north and south of the canal, was completed to provide channel protection. The length of each jetty was 725 ft, crest elevations were +8.0 ft mlw, crown widths were 6.0 ft, and side slopes were 1:1 (Figure 32). 1938 Each jetty was extended to 2,095 ft (Figure 32). 1960's The south jetty was removed and replaced by a new jetty to increase the entrance size to accommodate larger vessels and to improve navigation safety. The new jetty had a crest elevation of +8.0 ft mlw and a 14.0-ft crown width (Figure 32). The design wave was 6.3 ft, 4.8 sec. 1985 The north jetty has subsided, lost stone, and the toe has scoured. aD Bulkhead BACON HEALTH CENTER HWY. BR. (FIXED) 2 LANES South Jett, SCALE OF FEET 600 2 600 3200 MHW 6.0-4__ r= EL+8.0 CAPSTONE 14.0 CAPSTONE MLW (aeciesl CORESTONE, | p= EETBION CORESTONE XMATSTONE—’ ORIGINAL CROSS SECTION NEW SOUTH JETTY CROSS SECTION Figure 32. Delaware River and Chesapeake Bay Canal, Delaware 56 Table 27 Smyrna River Jetties, Kent County, Delaware Philadelphia District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1939 Two parallel stone-filled timber crib jetties were constructed to provide channel protection. The north jetty was 803 ft, and original plans called for the south jetty to be 2,700 ft; however, project maps indicate it was approximately 2,000 ft (Figure 33). 1986 There is no records of repairs. The project has been deauthorized. NEW CASTLE COUNTY Landing KENT COUNTY ) Brick Store Landing Upstream limit of Federal Project Smyrna Ldg Ris Prices Ldg. a \\ SCALE OF FEET 5000 2) 3000 ———— Figure 33. Smyrna River, Delaware 57 Date(s) Table 28 Mispillion River Jetties Kent and Sussex Counties, Delaware Philadelphia District Construction and Rehabilitation History 1859 1879 1896 1897 1899 1901 1904 1907 1908 1911 A 560-ft-long jetty was constructed by local interests north of the entrance. The jetty was installed by placing a row of close-fitting piling and brush. The jetty had deteriorated considerably, and the Federal government made repairs. A 350-ft-long stone-filled timber crib dike was constructed on the west side of the new channel. The jetty was extended shoreward 200 ft at a cost of $1,600. Repairs were made to 141 ft of the 1897 extension at the seaward end at a cost of $506. The stone-filled timber crib dike had become a channel obstruction and was removed. The jetty was extended 805 ft shoreward by placing stone over brush- filled pile and timber crib. The extension was 12.0 ft wide with pile elevations of +11.0 ft mlw and stone elevations of +8.0 ft mlw. The gap between the extension and the existing jetty ends was filled with 313 cu yd of stone. The jetty was extended 85 ft shoreward at a cost of $870, using 1904 construction geometry. The extension was classified as repairs. Repairs were made to 68 ft of the jetty damaged by a storm on Jan- uary 11, 1908. A jetty was constructed south of the entrance and parallel to the north jetty. The south jetty was 3,300 ft long and was constructed by placing stone over brush-filled pile and timber erib for 2,200 ft, and over an existing 1,100-ft-long bulkhead. The jetty was 6.0 ft wide with pile elevations of +7.0 ft mlw and stone elevations of +5.5 ft mlw. The north and south jetties were separ- ated by 210 ft. Costs of repairs and new construction were $22,770 and $350,000, respectively. The locations of the jetties are shown in Figure 34. The south jetty was extended 1,800 ft at a cost of $18,431 using 1904 construction geometry. Repairs were made to the south jetty by fill- ing settled sections with 96 cu yd of stone. The cost was $18,431 for extension and $384 for repairs. (Continued) 58 Date(s) Table 28 (Continued) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1912, 1913, 1914 1915 1920 1939 1944 1948 1963 1964 The north jetty was extended 400 ft seaward in each of these years (1,200-ft total) at a cost of $4,940, $4,800, and $5,000, respec- tively. Extensions were 6.0 ft wide with +7.0-ft mlw pile elevations and +5.5-ft mlw stone elevations. Both jetties were repaired by adding or replacing broken and decayed timber or piling, and a preservative was applied to tops of piles. Stone was placed to fill settled sections. The cost of repairs was Somsnier The south jetty was extended 700 ft to a total length of 5,800 ft using the same type of construction and geometry as the existing jetty. Both jetties were repaired in the same manner as the 1915 repairs. Costs of repairs and the extension were $2,422 and $26,033, respectively. The north jetty was extended 3,500 ft seaward at a cost of $129,140, using 1912-1914 construction geometry. Tops of piles were coated with tar on the north jetty near the river mouth at a cost of $320. The north jetty was repaired beginning 708 ft from the shoreward end and extending 942 ft seaward. The original timber crib section was rehabilitated to a rubble-mound structure (Figure 34). The cost of repairs was $51,493, and 4,870 tons of stone were used. A survey of the north jetty indicated there was no visible trace of the shoreward 708 ft. The total length of the existing jetty was 5,642 ft. The shoreward, rubble-mound, end had an average height of +6.2 ft mlw. The 1,200-ft-long timber crib structure adjacent to the rubble-mound section had deteriorated. Upper crib work was virtually nonexistent, and tops of piles were rotted or broken off. Stone had settled an average of 2.8 ft from design, was displaced, and had spilled out between piles. Piles, tie rods, and wales in the most seaward 3,500 ft appeared to be in good condition. Stone had settled an average of 1.5 ft in this section. Minor rehabilitation was done on the north jetty at a cost of $377,848. The 1,200-ft-long deteriorated timber crib section was rehabilitated to a rubble-mound structure. The center line of the rubble-mound structure was placed north of the center line of the timber crib jetty to prevent failure of the jetty on the channel side due to lateral forces. The offset was 11.0 ft over a distance of 650 ft and 9.0 ft over a distance of 400 ft, shoreward and seaward ends of the section, respectively. Transition sections were on either end of the new structure and between the two offset sections. Crest elevation was +7.0 ft mlw, crown width was 10.0 ft, and side slopes were 1V:1.5H. Twenty-five ton minimum capstone was placed over 1- to 50-lb matstone. A layer of willow matting, compressed in (Continued) 59 Table 28 (Concluded) Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1964 place to 1.5 ft thick, was provided as a filter. Core stone, 25 to (Cont.) 500 1b, was placed on the channel side of the existing jetty ata slope of 1V:1H to 1V:1.5H to ensure stability of the rubble-mound structure. The 3,500-ft-long timber crib on the seaward end of the jetty was filled with core stone, 150 to 300 lb, to the original de- sign elevation of +5.5 ft mlw. Cross sections of the rehabilitation are shown in Figure 35. 1985 The jetties are in good condition and have been effective in pro- viding safe navigation and preventing channel shoaling. 9/ autes to Pritodelphra SUSSEX COUNTY Mwy. ORIDGE ( FIXED) DELAWARE SCALE OF FEET 20000 2 4 6 810000 STONE TO BE PLACED IN INNER END OF NORTH JETTY EXISTING TIMBER PILES ROTTED OFF AT EL*3.0 <4 SECTION AT STA. I*+50 Figure 34. Mispillion River, Delaware 60 & | @ EXISTING JETTY +10F +10 APPROX. +7.0 FEET MLW 15 MecrosriNG TIMBER PILING (BADLY DETERIORATED) 6.0 HA si Or Beil 0ZZ wey Suede o CORE STONE BRUSH MAT MAT STONE EXISTING GROUND 3 EXISTING TIMBER CRIB JETTY bara wi Lig 10k SHOREWARD SECTION £ ISTING JETTY +o ROAERERIS +0 APPROX. *+7.0 FEET MLW 60 EXISTING TIMBER PILING (BADLY DETERIORATED) CHANNEL SIDE Oj— 30 Z— MAT STONE -—--— : CORE STONE mic | MAT STONE _- EXISTING GROUND ey aN EXISTING TIMBER CRIB JETTY “a “10 SEAWARD SECTION SCALE _IN FEET 10 5 (0) 10 20 a Gaar| @ FILL TO EL+5.5 mac EL +5.5 CHANNEL SIDE | PILI —_-—-—~ EXISTING TIMBER PILING neReceONE | 52 | N 40 Seiad pop Le CAPA AM Wen & EXISTING GROUND Ae be | | EXISTING STONE FILL is TYPICAL SECTION __TIMBER CRIB SCALE _IN FEET 10 : Q 19 20 Figure 35. Cross sections of 1964 rehabilitation of Mispillion River jetties Date(s) 1908 1911- 1914 1917, 1920, 1923 1937 1939 1944 1985 Table 29 Roosevelt Inlet Jetty Lewes, Delaware Philadelphia District Construction and Rehabilitation History A 1,263-ft-long stone-filled timber crib jetty was constructed on the west side of the inlet. Stone replacement repairs were made each of these years. Cause of damage was due to inadequate jetty design; waves easily damaged the timber cribs. The cribs were also permeable to sand. The timber crib jetty was replaced by two steel sheet-pile jetties, constructed 500 ft apart, on the east and west sides of the inlet. Both jetties were 1,700 ft long (Figure 36). Crest elevations were +8.0 ft mlw, except the shoreward ends which were +10.0 ft mlw. The jetties had deteriorated due to corrosion. The jetties were flanked and rubble was placed along the east bank. The additional rubble extended the east jetty shoreward 400 ft. The possibility of the west jetty becoming completely flanked was determined to be remote; therefore, no rubble was placed on the west bank. Seaward ends of both jetties were repaired due to deterioration by corrosion. The jetties are in poor condition and are ineffective. They are considered a navigation hazard and are to be removed. 62 4 WEST JETTY LIGHT © D SEAST JETTY LIGHT a Oc.G. LEWES yy ‘ LES OC SOM ‘ SS Oy ’ % SCALE IN FEET 000 ) 1000 _2000 La a wn wn] Figure 36. Roosevelt Inlet, Delaware 63 Date(s) 1898 1901 1985 Table 30 Delaware Bay Harbor of Refuge Breakwaters Fort Miles , Delaware Construction and Rehabilitation History A 5,000-ft-long detached breakwater was completed to offer harbor protection from east-northeast storms. The structure was located 2,800 ft west of Cape Henlopen and extended west-northwest (Fig- ure 37). The cost of construction was $2,790,000. Construction was completed on a second detached breakwater to provide harbor protection from northwest storms (Figure 37). The structure began at a point 6,000 ft north of Cape Henlopen and extended north- west 7,500 ft. The rubble-mound breakwater was constructed with 1,475,276 tons of stone at a cost of $2,239,000. The breakwaters have no history of repairs and have survived remark- ably well. The structures are outdated and would not be repaired if damaged. They no longer serve their intended purpose because of changes in the shipping industry. (CE PIERS eee” ro) i 2) 2 VS BS N CZ =) I Vg aN iA < Nips: ee Bb ies ° ey. & = a Sx + = D > a carers te coves’ he BREAKWATER =3 i we Cape Henlopen par eas Poe hy ¥ e ? a Ld sarvies ¥ ff TER 4 be = Pree S — — SSS Yy : Fort Miles ™m a Se > (@ASCULE) Os =z, Xe P= ~~ /: Figure 37. Delaware Bay Harbor of Refuge, Delaware 64 Date(s) 1882 1883 1886 1922 1924 1930- 1931 1946 1955 1959 1977 IS = 1982 Table 31 Manasquan Inlet Jetties Manasquan, New Jersey Philadelphia District Construction and Rehabilitation History A 1,515-ft-long timber jetty and dike was constructed north of the inlet. A timber jetty was constructed south of the inlet to a length of approximately 500 ft. The south jetty was flanked, and use of the inlet was seriously impaired. New timber jetties were constructed. The jetties were in a state of disrepair. Two rubble-mound jetties were constructed north and south of the inlet to replace the timber jetties and provide channel protection. The north jetty was 1,230 ft long, and the south jetty was 1,030 ft long. The jetties were spaced 400 ft apart and built to an elevation of +14 ft mlw, with a 12.0-ft crown width and side slopes of 1V:1.5H on the ocean side, and 1V:1H on the channel side (Figure 38). Cap- stone was 2.0 ton, and core stone ranged from 100 to 500 lb. Both jetties were rehabilitated using 5,190 tons of capstone, 2,886 tons of corestone, and 628 cu yd of grout. The cost of rehabilitation was $56,778. The north jetty was rehabilitated using 5,400 tons of stone at a cost of $128,597. The south jetty was rehabilitated using 12.0-ton capstone at a cost of $67,048. The seaward 100 ft and 60 ft of the north and south jetties, respec- tively, were destroyed through continued displacement of armor stone and loss of structural integrity. The south jetty was damaged from the seaward end to 700 ft shoreward. Sand passed from the south jetty fillet through and over the jetty into the inlet. Both jetties were rehabilitated using dolosse. Sand and displaced stone were excavated and reshaped to design configuration before dolosse placement. Sixteen-ton dolosse were placed along the seaward 400 ft on the north side of the south jetty, around the jetty head, and along the seaward 50 ft on the south side. The dolosse extended to -10 ft mlw on the channel side, with side slopes of 1V:2H, and front slopes of 1V:3H. The seaward 400 ft was concrete capped, 20 ft wide, and was built at an elevation of +14 ft mlw. Sixteen-ton dolosse were placed along the seaward 250 ft on the north side of the north jetty, around the jetty head, and along the seaward 90 ft on (Continued ) 65 Date(s) 1979- 1982 (Cont. ) 1985 Table 31 (Concluded) Construction and Rehabilitation History the south side. The seaward 240 ft was concrete capped, 35 ft wide at the seaward end and 20 ft wide elsewhere. Capstone was placed shoreward of the dolosse section, 375 ft on the north side and crest, and 90 ft on the south side. Capstone size decreased in the shore- ward direction from 12.0 to 3.0 to 5.0 tons. Design wave height was 25.0 ft. An aerial photograph of the rehabilitation is shown in Figure 39. The jetties were subjected to several storms after the 1982 rehabili- tation, including a design level storm in March 1984. Photogram- metric monitoring of the structures under the Monitoring of Completed Coastal Projects (MCCP) Program indicated the last rehabilitation of the jetties has been fully successful to date. 66 4 N Sx ; ON a SS pennies = 64 a) MONMOUTH Vrs rae $ Kk i p RR BR \> wy COUNTY Sia Sy bas = Ye Z § AA ° c ( cnannec 2 12 FT. OEEP ne 8 4 intet channel Y y /4 Ft deep to YY) Zr Yttem ianer end of EA el ER North ees = emt ‘ANCHORAGE Cs [SS (| 10 FT. DEEP 19 ACRES, 2, oal— > \ SS fs 3 >? KR i i >>. 2 4, Caraaerg ‘S bo ain x Sees — ae INT PLEASANT BEACH acc re Sim & os n 3 OCEAN ~ COUNTY VEW JERSEY /NTRACOASTAL WATERWAY (SEE (NOEX WAP a NO a7) Sy Upstream limit of Federal Project SCALE IN FEET 1000 2000 500_0 POINT PLEASANT CANAL, FORMERLY BAYHEAD-MANASQUAN CANAL CAPSTONE CHANNEL SIDE CORESTONE Toe T ORIGINAL NORTH & SOUTH JETTY SECTION 5 O 5 10 IS FEET ee Ee Manasquan River, New Jersey Figure 38. 67 SASS WHA SSS a aes 1es pb b oO 2) b oO 4 s Hs ° Sd amb 3 0 low) Qed a 4 S-d @ a = @ a GH oO oO & an Q. 00 wo {<4 G> 80 ou ob ov ov awa ad lon) ~ 1) = 2 jolt) pian Fi 68 Date(s) 1940 1944 1950 1954 1972- 1974 1985 Table 32 Barnegat Inlet Jetties Barnegat, New Jersey Philadelphia District Construction and Rehabilitation History Two converging stone jetties were constructed north and south of the inlet for channel protection. The north jetty was 4,675 ft long, and the south jetty was 2,820 ft long (Figure 40). Design crest eleva- tion was +2.0 ft mlw. The shoreward 100 ft of the south jetty was lowered. Repairs were made to the seaward end of the north jetty. Repairs were made to the shoreward portion of the south jetty. To prevent sand passing through and waves overtopping the north jetty, the shoreward 3,700 ft was raised to +8.0 ft mlw and made impermeable. The center line of the section repaired was offset 12.0 ft toward the inlet from the existing section (Figure 40). Due to instability and continuous shoaling of the navigation channel, proposals are being considered to construct a new south jetty. Por- tions of the jetties have crest elevations of +10.0 ft mlw. These sections were probably built as part of repair work conducted in 1950 and 1954. Figure 41 is an aerial photograph of the jetties in 1984. 69 07 —\ ‘Sler ea OCEAN COUNTY Woretown 4 — S le NI “, \3 x S$ 8 Ni ls = : i w = a \§ > w — > = Ne F by = 2 —~, = North Jerty S (Reised to pont + 1235 ¢t. from oa = — = ~~ = v Ge ¢ Altered serty Existing Jetty ¢ | 16'-O"* /niet_sid@__§—_ | El 8 5-0" — 6'-0O" Cap stone, five tons min Exist. grade, elevarion varies MLW E'00 10'- 0" Excavarion~ — Core stone, (OO ro 1000 = yy L_ grade or El-/5' Mar stone 3 #* 10 50 4% TYPICAL SECTION RAISED NORTH JETTY NOT TO SCALE Figure 40. Barnegat Inlet, New Jersey 70 Figure 41. Photograph of Barnegat Inlet jetties al Table 33 Double Creek Jetty Ocean County, New Jersey Philadelphia District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation Histor 1912 A 550-ft-long timber pile jetty was constructed to provide channel control (Figure 42). 1986 There is no repair history. COUNTY Shad Point —S 77 mii ry G a ’o Barnegat elie ne e y 7 We aes Figure 42. Double Creek, New Jersey T2 Table 34 Absecon Inlet Jetties Atlantic City, New Jersey Philadelphia District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1948 Construction began on a 3,727-ft-long jetty on the east side of the harbor for channel control. Crest elevation was +8.0 ft mlw. An 800-ft-long groin served as a jetty on the west side of the harbor (Figure 43). 1986 No repair or rehabilitation history is available. Figure 44 is an aerial photograph of the jetties in 1971. WZ Upstream limit of / (Federo Project / ATLANTIC | SCALE OF FEET SEs 4 = —S—S—S Figure 43. Absecon Inlet, New Jersey is Figure 44. Photograph of Absecon Inlet jetties 74 Table 35 Goshen Creek Jetties Cape May County, New Jersey Philadelphia District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1897 A 600-ft-long sheet-pile jetty was constructed south of the entrance to provide channel control. 1898 The south jetty was extended shoreward to maintain the dredged channel. 1899 The south jetty was repaired with brush and stone and extended to 680 ft. A jetty was constructed north of the entrance, parallel to the south jetty, at a length of 680 ft (Figure 45). 1986 The south jetty is now 1,800 ft long (Figure 45), but the date of the extension is unknown. No history is available on maintenance in this century, and the project is specified as inactive. é CAPE MAY mS 8 z é g = COUNTY Ver ys J NE ; q g “SN Sy Q ete Figure 45. Goshen Creek, New Jersey 15 Date(s) 1911 1915 1916 1917 1922 1923 1927 1946 1948 1949 1964 1979 1986 Table 36 Cold Spring Inlet Jetties Cape May County, New Jersey Philadelphia District Construction and Rehabilitation History Construction was completed on two parallel jetties 850 ft apart, on the east and west sides of the inlet. Lengths were approximately 4,548 ft and 4,410 ft east and west, respectively (Figure 46). Crest elevations were +10 ft mlw, crown widths varied from 6.0 to 15.0 ft, and side slopes were generally 1V:1.5H. A total of 326,049 tons of stone was used. Shoreward wing lengths were 750 ft and 297 ft east and west, respectively. Wings of both jetties and the shoreward 2,000 ft of the west jetty were constructed of stone-filled pile and timber. The remainder of the west jetty and the entire east jetty were rubble mound. Repairs were made by placing 8,497 tons of stone at a cost of $24,810. Repairs were made by placing 9,023 tons of stone at a cost of $31,816. Repairs were made by placing 1,500 tons of stone. An unknown quantity of stone was placed at a cost of $5,410. The seaward 368 ft of the west jetty was repaired with concrete blocks and stone. The shoreward 1,572 ft of the west jetty was grout-sealed. Repairs were made by placing 10,424 tons of stone at a cost of $63,884. Repairs were made by placing 519 tons of stone at a cost of $12,072. Dolphin and jetty repairs were made at a cost of $6,204. Repairs were made by placing 235 tons of stone at a cost of $3,416. Jetties were rehabilitated at a cost of $174,879. Jetties were rehabilitated at a cost of $197,891. No further repair information is available. Figure 47 is an aerial photograph of the jetties in 1982. 76 yw 19 ——— oo Fix. £Qvwr ga > | Yp jee = tes Lg aRBOR mo P CAPE Scnelienger oa Se se \\ < i U.S. COAST & \ GUARD BASE 3 De \ = (ale.o} >) = mn a 5000 — Figure 46. Cold Spring Inlet, New Jersey Ut Figure 47. Photograph of Cold Spring Inlet jetties 78 Table 37 Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay Canal Jetties Cape May, New Jersey, Philadelphia District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1943 Two parallel jetties were constructed on either side of the entrance for channel protection (Figure 48). 1986 No jetty repair information was found. Lengths of the jetties are approximately 600 ft and 700 ft north and south, respectively. Z ? 2 =. a SCALE OF FEET EXTEND 8 STONE GROINS i000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6000 2 or SCALE OF FEET 2 coo 3000 Figure 48. Cape May Harbor to Delaware Bay Canal, New Jersey vg Date(s) 1939 1956 IG 1985 Table 38 Indian River Inlet Jetties Indian River Inlet, Delaware Philadelphia District Construction and Rehabilitation History Two parallel jetties were completed to provide inlet protection. The jetties were 1,566 ft long and 500 ft apart. The shoreward 904 ft and 890 ft of the north and south jetties, respectively, were con- structed of steel sheet pile, and the seaward portions were con- structed of stone. The stone jetties had a crest elevation of +6.0 ft mlw, a crown width of 10.0 ft, and side slopes of 1V:1.5H (Figure 49). Storm damages to the south jetty were repaired. The north jetty was repaired because of storm damages and was ex- tended shoreward 320 ft because of shoreline recession and deterioration of the sheet pile (Figure 49). The jetty heads are in poor condition because of slope failure, sub- sidence, and toe scour. Repair alternatives have been proposed, and the use of dolosse has been suggested. Figure 50 is an aerial photo- graph of the jetties taken in 1985. 80 CAPSTONE 0 CORESTONE MATSTONE STEEL SHEET PILING TYPICAL SECTION NTS CAP STONE CORESTONE MATSTONE PRESENT BOTTOM HALF SECTION-OUTER 300' OF JETTY NTS Figure 49. y oa Uy REHOBOTH BAY b ok OGEAN Bolders Pond ~ BOTTOM HILLS DRAIN §2Z : —=— AB US COAST GUARD STATION Burton talond INDIAN RIVER —— he INLET JETTIES a RIVER BAY DELAWARE SEASHORE STATE PARK ELEV 35° MHWw S | ~ i : & = x’ 3 e S : : N Tt SCALE OF MILES | 0 | NEW FILTER MATERIAL NEW FINISHED GRADE ELEVATION VARIES EXISTING CONCRETE WALK EXISTING HANDRAIL NEW INTERLOCKING CAPSTONE INLET SIDE EXISTING CAPSTONE EXISTING FILTER MATERIAL EXISTING SHEET PILING TYPICAL SECTION OF REHABILITATED BULKHEAD NTS Indian River Inlet, Delaware 81 Figure 50. | I ReMi Photograph of Indian River Inlet jetties 82 Date(s) 1939 1964 1982 1986 Table 39 Rock Hall Harbor Breakwaters Rock Hall, Maryland Baltimore District Construction and Rehabilitation History Two breakwaters were constructed with 8,400 tons of stone. Lengths of the breakwaters were 850 ft and 700 ft east and west, respectively (Figure 51). Elevations of the breakwaters were +4.0 ft mlw, with a single capstone, crown width of 4.0 ft, and side slopes of 1V:1.5H. Repairs were made on both breakwaters to restore them to original design geometry. The east breakwater was in good condition with crest subsidence of less than 0.5 ft. The majority of the repairs were made on the west breakwater. The landward 80 ft had subsided up to 2.0 ft, the seaward 50 ft had subsided to mlw, and the adjacent 380 ft had subsided 1.0 to 2.5 ft. The landward ends of both break- waters were repaired with 250- to 500-lb stone. A 40-ft extension was added to the west breakwater (Figure 51), and the outer 220 ft, including the extension, were repaired with 1,000 to 2,000-lb cover and core stone. The adjacent 260 ft were raised by filling the existing section with additional core stone. Extensive rehabilitation was done to both breakwaters due to wave transmission and overtopping causing excessive wave heights (greater than 4.0 ft) in the inner harbor. Estimated cost of the rehabi- litation was $1,800,000 and required over 27,000 tons of stone. Crown elevation was raised to +7.0 ft mlw, crown width was widened to 8.0 ft with three capstones, and side slopes remained 1V:1.5H requiring 12,400 tons of stone. The west breakwater was extended to 1,100 ft requiring 14,800 tons of stone. Cover stone used for rehabilitation ranged from 2,300 lb at the trunk to 2,800 lb at the head. Cross sections and location of the rehabilitation are shown in Figure 52. No further repair or maintenance information has been found. 83 el “EY ROCK HALL eo COUNT Y WINOMILL Aw, POINT wl y SCALE OF FEET 100 Oo 500 ee oe ee Figure 51. Rock Hall Harbor, Maryland 84 JOQUeY TTPH Yooy ‘uoTAJeAYTTTGeyed 2g, JO SuOTJOaS SSOUD pue MATA UeTq “2G aun3Ty ee oat ® ——— 4284 wt D1V98 YILVANVaUE LSVA aoosv3s GNv u3id 8.0uveann AVAATIVE JNIUVWY TiwH "30u 02-..1 31v9S SNOISN31X3 H3LVMyV3H8 SNOILD3S WOIdA! SNOT 14 08 € NOILD3S 1400 = 4 ta MW 00 A373 MIW 14 0 14A313 7 68Vs WIL Y3AV7 ONIDO3B & HOD aa OL/M UBAVIZ 3NO18 Y3AVTE3ONN $81 0002 - OOE'2-m SYURAVIZ ANOLS BHONYY SNOT 14 SEI 2 NOILO3S. DIMA A HAL WE 139tt -———. ae WH38 ALIMBVIS 8 HO) ae an | Nes = MIW 1490/4 A373 GAZ e = —— —_— OL/M SUIAWI 2 em 3NOIS HIAVINIONN — SR100F 2 M SURAWTZ 3NOLS HOWHY ONO114 Set ' NON93S ig ay —- - owas u3Av1 ONIGO3a & ey CoN) 131 — =I — OL/M SURIAWTE MW 00 A313 NOLS B3AVIN30NN $61 OOE'2-M BUSAVIZ ' mW HONOR —— -ho OCEAN SIDE TON STONE 1+ FILTER FABRIC 1983 SOUTH JETTY REPAIR Figure 62. Ocean City Inlet, Maryland 101 Date(s) Table 50 Colonial Beach Breakwaters Colonial Beach, Virginia Baltimore District Construction and Rehabilitation History 1982 1985 Seven offshore breakwaters were constructed as part of a beach restoration project for approximately $447,000, using over 9,000 tons of stone (Figure 63). One 300-ft breakwater and two 200-ft break- waters were placed at Castlewood Beach, and four 200-ft breakwaters were placed at Central Beach. All were placed parallel to the shore- line and approximately 100 ft offshore, and they were separated by 150-ft gaps. Crest elevations were +3.0 ft mlw but allowed for set- tlement to +2.0 ft mlw. Crown widths were 6.0 ft, and side slopes were 1V:1.5H. One layer of 2,000-lb cover stone was placed over one layer of 500-1lb underlayer resting on a core and 1 ft bedding layer. Design wave height was 6.0 ft. The breakwaters are in excellent condition and serving their intended function. 102 SIUTSITA ‘yoRag 31v9S OL LON V3auv HOV3E WYVd GOOMIAILSVD NOILIIS TWWOIIdAL QUOJSJOW YJDOUEQ |/0S NyIsUI UO Ped0)d I1NqQ04 J24I14 NEI NIGU 39 GNV_ 3JYOI) JNOLSLYW Ol-----—----** (Y3Av7 | —pNoss 8 00s 3NOLS us waONN ITS. SNOLS 81 0002 67; WW S (43AV7 1) NOLS YONYY og—e=! MIW 140° 31VIS OL LON v3¥uV HOV38 IWYLN3ZO NOILISS = WWOIIdAL (Y3AV1 1) NOLS YOWNY le 9'9—=] MINIS O72 TeTUOTO) "€9 aun3tTy SYSLVMAVING HOvae YW ee GOOM3TISVD — 7 =; SuaLVMV3ua : Hdv3a9g \\ WYLN3D) —e \ . \\:. 03 1 Table 51 Nomini Bay and Creek Jetty Westmoreland County, Virginia Baltimore District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1912 A 2,410-ft-long stone jetty was completed (Figure 64). 1981 A survey indicated the jetty was in good condition. 1986 No further repair or maintenance information has been found. Elbow Point ‘White Oak Point Hickory Point WESTMORELAND COUNTY fT HOLLY /— Draw Bridge Figure 64. Nomini Bay and Creek, Virginia 104 Date(s) 1968 1981 1986 Table 52 Bonum Creek Jetties Westmoreland County, Virginia Baltimore District Construction and Rehabilitation History Construction was completed on two stone jetties at an estimated cost of $221,000 using 8,000 tons of stone. The north jetty was 800 ft long, and the south jetty was 300 ft long (Figure 65). Crown eleva- tion was +4.0 ft mlw, crown width was 4.0 ft with a single capstone, and side slopes were 1V:2H. Cover stone used was 2.5 tons, and core stone ranged from 25 to 500 lb. Design wave height was 9.0 ft. A condition survey revealed that the jetties had undergone some set- tlement but were in good condition. No further repair or maintenance information has been found. 25LBS TO 5OOLBS CORE MATERIAL 25 TON MIN. 2 CAP STONES 'C77 VARIABLE BOTTOM FILTER BLANKET TYPICAL JETTY SECTION ss SCALE OF FEET : 7) ° 5 10 By irewere rareere | rn WESTMORELAND.) (~ <<" COUNTY SCALE OF FEET woo + & 3 4 300 Figure 65. Bonum Creek, Virginia 105 Table 53 Herring Creek Jetties St. Marys County, Maryland Baltimore District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation Histor 1960- Two jetties were constructed to 750- and 700-ft lengths north and 1961 south, respectively (Figure 66). Crown elevation was +4.5 ft mlw, crown width was 4.0 ft, and side slopes were 1V:2.5H. A 1.0-ft-thick bedding layer was placed, and a 1.0-ft-thick by 10.0-ft-wide apron was placed along both jetty toes. 1981 A survey indicated the jetties were in good condition with only minor settlement. 1986 No further repair or maintenance information has been found. . MARYS COUNTY Free! Figure 66. Herring Creek, Maryland 106 Date(s) 1937 1970 1981 1985 Table 54 Little Wicomico River Jetties Norththumberland County, Virginia Baltimore District Construction and Rehabilitation History Two stone jetties were constructed to lengths of 1,000 and 1,300 ft north and south, respectively (Figure 67). Timber pile jetties were also placed at the landward ends of the stone jetties. Lengths of the timber piles were 357 ft north and 650 ft south. The north timber pile jetty was repaired at a cost of $51,822. Survey of the jetties indicated the seaward 300 ft of each jetty had crown elevations ranging from -2.0 to +6.0 ft and no semblance of a crown width. The jetties were to be rehabilitated to minimize shoaling of the fed- eral channel. The seaward 290 ft of each jetty was to be made sand tight by placing core stone and cover stone on the outer face at a 1-V:1.5-H slope. Crown elevation was to be +4.0 ft mlw, with a crown width up to 15.0 ft along the sections with crown elevations below +4.0 ft mlw. Toe protection was to be provided by a 2.0-ft-thick by 5.0-ft-wide extension of the core stone. A double layer of 1.0-ton cover stone was to be used. It is not known if the work was done. 107 #. Td) wars TYPICAL SECTION THROUGH JETTIES ANDO CHANNEL (NOT TO SCALE) NORTHUMBERLAND COUNTY SCALE OF FEET Figure 67. Little Wicomico River, Virginia 108 Table 55 Urbanna Creek Jetties Urbanna, Virginia Norfolk District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1956 Two jetties were constructed for channel control. The north jetty, 1,895 ft long, was rubble mound. The 717-ft-long south jetty was built of timber (Figure 68). 1962 The north jetty was rehabilitated. 1986 No further repair or maintenance information has been found. MIDDLESEX CO>™> Rosegill Farm SCALE IN FEET 4 6 8-10 _ 1200 Figure 68. Urbanna Creek, Virginia 109 Table 56 Carters Creek Jetty, Crab Point, Virginia Norfolk District Construction and Rehabilitation History Date(s) 1902- 1906 1986 A 742-ft-long rubble-mound jetty was built to provide channel control (Figure 69). No further repair or maintenance information has been found. ae oe Humphreys x:, Marine Railway Inc. » /o\ RV INGTON Gallyhook Pt\:J accyene Branch ead Roce Ground Pt Bulkh | Pierhead Xe Line b-Butkheoa Line — Pierhead Line EVAN CHAR SHal Esk co. 4, Pp 7) P/ Ve, a SCALE IN FEET o 500 1000 1300 Figure 69. Carters Creek, Virginia 110 Table 57 Milford Haven Jetty Narrows Point, Virginia Norfolk District Date(s) Construction and Rehabilitation History 1913 A 1,183-ft-long rubble-mound jetty was constructed to provide channel control (Figure 70). 1986 No further repair or maintenance information has been found. GWYNN ISLAND calls wrart.\ VE DRAW SPAN ~ \ G cteroene YEE EM SCALE IN FEET ° t 1000 3000 Figure 70. Milford Haven, Virginia Date(s) 1981 1986 Table 58 Tylers Beach Jetties Isle of Wight County, Virginia Norfolk District Construction and Rehabilitation History Two parallel rubble-mound jetties were constructed to provide channel control. Both jetties were 370 ft in length and spaced 120 ft apart (Figure 71). Crest elevation was +5.0 ft mlw but allowed for 0.5 to 1.0 settlement; crown width was 5.0 ft; and side slopes were 1V:2H. One layer of armor stone, 300 to 500 1b, was placed over one layer of core stone, 3.0 to 40 lb. The jetties rested on a 2.0-ft-thick sand blanket. The sand was encased by filter fabric. A 5.0-ft-wide, 1.5-ft-thick apron and a 5.0-ft-wide, 3.0-ft-thick apron were placed on the shore and channel sides, respectively (Figure 71). A 6.0-sec, 4.1-ft design wave was used. Estimated cost of construction was $245,000. No further repair or maintenance information has been found. 112 COUNTY eeu / Stone Jetty Wim We bb S Vie BA \ NG SCALE _IN FEET > 400 {e) 400 8 1200 SHORE SIDE CHANNEL SIDE ——5.0" — en eu ms an SAND @LAMKET REVETMENT/JETTY TYPICAL SECTION Tylers Beach, Virginia Figure 71. 113 ish ba mee EP) Re HONE ERR | we Ma : es Re fa } y" F :, Saas eis “ee Onsale mes pare ied E , icai¢ ee Lf ie ry, - Ss wer. o bie , e _ , ve ace ‘ ‘ a Sys nas Lo ee Dea rt yeeeeve ages a Se n\n mre eka enh Ar ‘ vi aS os P eS te ,