cree toner rig cet nena ie Sateen ens Sones Miss J.B.Mackenzie, The Librarian, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard College, CAMBRIDGE 38, Massachusetts, U.S.A. From:- The Librarian, Sedgwick Museum, CAMBRIDGE, England. HARVARD UNIVERSITY LIBRARY OF THE MUSEUM OF COMPARATIVE ZOOLOGY GIFT OF THe Lie@RaRtAwv Stace wick Meseum Camgri nee, Enver ana Wein J 1 a A CATALOGUE OF THE COLLECTION OF CAMBRIAN AND SILURIAN FOSSILS IN THE GEOLOGICAL MUSEUM OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE. London: CAMBRIDGE WAREHOUSE, 17 PATERNOSTER ROW. Cambridee : BELL AND CO. , N DEIGHTO A CATALOGUE OF THE COLLECTION OF CAMBRIAN AND SILURIAN FOSSILS CONTAINED IN THE GEOLOGICAL MUSEUM OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE, BY J We SADDER, IG.s: WITH A PREFACE BY THE REV. ADAM SEDGWICK, LL.D. F.R:S. WOODWARDIAN PROFESSOR OF GEOLOGY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE, AND A TABLE OF GENERA AND INDEX ADDED BY PROFESSOR MORRIS, F.G.S. Cambridge: AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. M. DCCC, LX XIII. Caiver VAAL Cambridge : PRINTED BY C. J. CLAY, M.A. AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. MUS. COMP. ZCOL LIBRARY SEP 1961 HARVARS UNIVERSITY ~ p Bs v7 uF, ow — ee fe. hoe (a Ay { ; ibe melon a c G CONTENTS. GENERAL SECTION OF THE PALHozoIc SySTEM IN BRITAIN . ; : : : 1 SECTION OF THE LOWER AND MIDDLE CAMBRIAN IN NorRTH WALES. : : 3 GEOLOGICAL Map oF PortTMADOC ESTUARY . : : : ; : ‘ ; 9 TABLE OF THE BRITISH AND FOREIGN CAMBRIAN AND LOWER SILURIAN ROCKS 25 LowER CAMBRIAN FossILs : : : i ; ’ : ; : ; : ile MIDDLE CAMBRIAN F ; ; ; : 3 : 3—24 Upper CAMBRIAN . : : : ; : : ; ; E : ‘ : 25—83 SILURIAN, May Hitt Group : ; . é ; . : 2 : ; 84—90 “ LowER WENLOCK GROUP ; : ; : : é ; : : 91—98 - WENLOCK GROUP : ‘ ; , : : P ; : : 99—160 3 Lower LupLow GRovr . : : ; : : : : F . 161—174 i Urrrer LupLow Group ‘ s P ; : , : : : 175—187 m LupLow Bonre-BeD AND DOWNTON SANDSTONE . : : ; . 188—192 5 LEDBURY SHALES (PASSAGE BEDS) . : ‘ : : : ; 193 PREFACE. Sryce the proof-sheets of the following Catalogue issued from the press, I have earnestly desired to write an Introductory Preface to it. Week after week and month after month have I waited in anxious hope of completing my humble task. But I have been greatly interrupted by a chronic malady which makes me incapable of any long-continued mental labour; and, in addition to this hindrance, a painful infirmity of sight almost entirely prevents me from consulting my manuscripts and memoranda, made during the Geological tours of many past years. To spare this continued infirmity of sight I now gratefully dictate the following pages to my young friend and assistant in the Museum—Mr Walter Keeping. The old Catalogue of the Paleozoic Fossils, by Prof. M*Coy (now of the University of Melbourne), was a work of enormous labour and of very great scientific skill; especially when we consider the date of its appearance. Its publication was a real benefit to the Academic Student, a distinction to the University Press, and a great honour to its Author. In the clearness and elaborate accuracy of its descriptions of the several species the work is I think unrivalled, in spite of all that has been written since. But I wish to write historically, and profess not here to enter upon critical questions of scientific detail. In an advancing science like Geology, any catalogue, however good at the time of its publication. must soon become defective from changes of nomenclature, from improved classi- fications, and above all from the discovery of new species. Mr Davidson's great works on the Brachiopoda have thrown new light upon the divisions of that class of Mollusca, and very greatly changed the nomenciature of the genera and species. The great additions made, of late years, to our knowledge of the older Paleozoic Fauna, and especially to the groups of fossils now in our Museum, derived from the lower division of what were formerly called the Lingula Flags; still more the great Fletcher Collection b x PREFACE. from the Wenlock series, which has been purchased by the University since Prof. M°Coy’s Catalogue was printed—all these additions prove the necessity of corresponding changes in our Paleozoic Catalogues. After Mr Salter had left the service of the Government Survey he several times visited me at Cambridge, and was desirous to do his best to supply the imperfections of our Catalogue; and I joyfully accepted his offered services, knowing his great skill as a Natural Science Artist, and believing him, after his long-tried labours under the Government Survey, to be unrivalled in his exact scientific knowledge of the fossil Invertebrata of the British Isles. One condition of his engagement was that his work should be constructed as a Supplement to the old Catalogue, and not as an independent work. This condition Mr Salter professed to accept, though as his labours advanced he did not by any means perfectly conform to it. To his personal applications, seldom communicated to myself, and to the knowledge that he was employed in completing a Cambridge Paleozoic Catalogue, we owe many of the additions to our older Paleozoic Collection, to which I have before alluded. And let me here record in behalf of the University my grateful thanks to the Earl of Ducie, to David Homfray, Esq. of Portmadoc, to Dr Hicks of St Davids, to Mr Lightbody of Ludlow, to Mr Ash, and to Mr J. Plant of the Royal Museum, Salford, for their generous donations to our Collection; and I trust that the several donors have found a grateful and respectful notice in Mr Salter’s pages. If the names of any other benefactors have been here omitted, I can only plead in my behalf the death of Mr Salter before the Catalogue was quite complete, my present infirmity of sight which prevents me from consulting my Journals and Memoranda, and the strange clouds of oblivion which too often trouble an old man’s memory. Mr Salter’s task advanced very slowly; for his bodily health and his nervous system seemed to have been almost broken up by the stress of hard mental labour which had been imposed upon him through many preceding years. On several occasions he aban- doned his task at Cambridge, and went to recruit his health by a residence of a few months at Malvern, where he remained under medical care. But still the work did advance in spite of these interruptions, and the University at length undertook to pay the cost of it under certain conditions, with which he was willing to comply. After many delays and much anxiety (and I may add after much personal cost to myself) Mr Salter’s manuscript took a form which made it fit for the press. I do not however think it would ever have reached that state but for the kind advice and en- couragement and judicious help given to its author by the Master of St Peter’s College. And after the first press-work was done, it still was evident that the Catalogue required careful revision and correction; not in the naming and description of the species, but in PREFACE. xi such marks of reference as should intelligibly connect the Catalogue with the specimens arranged in the Cabinets of the Museum. Without this kind of labour the best Catalogue in the world would be of comparatively little use to a Cambridge student. Knowing this, I was induced to take a journey to Margate for the express purpose of seeing Mr Salter, and making arrangements for the discharge of all his personal expenses while he was employed in revising the references of his Catalogue, and giving the ultimate finish to his work. The state of his health was perfectly deplorable when I last saw him at Margate, and the hand of death very soon afterwards arrested all our hopes of obtaining the Author's final revision of his work. Again, we were, in an hour of need, under a great obligation to Dr Cookson, who undertook the laborious task of revising and completing the exact agreement of the cabinet- labels with the details given in the several pages of the Catalogue. This work of Dr Cookson’s not only required great labour, but very nice discrimination in the separation of the species, and demands from us the warmest expressions of our gratitude. The final scientific revision of the work was undertaken, at the request of the University, by Prof. Morris, who went through his task with that genuine conscientious and laborious skill which left nothing to be desired: and it was well for the reputation of the University that this final labour was undertaken by so distinguished a Palontologist; for there were several blemishes in the Catalogue: such, for example, as the appearance of the same species under different names, a few mistaken localities, and other little incongruities arising out of Mr Salter’s wretched health and continually interrupted labours. Since Prof. Morris’ last revision and Report there has been again a long delay, for which I alone am responsible; and I trust that the University will accept this acknowledgment as an apology from their very old and infirm, but, in former years, their very hard-working servant. The following Catalogue of all the Older Paleozoic Fossils in the Woodwardian Museum consists of specimens which have been collected by myself, or presented by my friends, or obtained by purchase during my very long tenure of office as Professor of Geology. It was meant to be a Supplement to the Synopsis of Paleozoic Fossils by Prof. M°Coy; but this condition, as before stated, was not strictly observed; for it will be seen, among other variations, that the nomenclature of Prof. M°Coy has not been always followed, the sub- sequent examination of some of the specimens by Mr Salter having induced him to class them under other genera than those under which they appeared in M'Coy’s “Synopsis.” The Collection is, to a great extent, arranged zoologically, under the several Geological divisions of the Strata adopted in this Catalogue; and the fossils of each division, commencing with the lowest, are tabulated under four columns—the first column indicating the number of b2 xii PREFACE. the Table-Case and column of Drawers (as Gh. 1); the second column giving illustrative figures of various genera, and also references to M*Coy’s Synopsis; the third giving the names adopted by Mr Salter, with references to one or more works in which they have been described or figured, with the addition of useful short notes on the species; the fourth column giving the localities from which the specimens have been obtained. I should ill discharge my duty in writing this Preface did I not gratefully notice the elaborate Index which Prof. Morris has added to the Catalogue. It is a graceful finish to the work, and makes the Catalogue fit for ready consultation, which is a matter of the first importance. This Index has been a work of such labour that I should not have ventured to ask the Professor to undertake it; but this thought makes me the more grateful to him for having contributed it so kindly and spontaneously. With like expressions of grateful goodwill I must also mention the Tables, in which is given an account of the whole range of formations within which each genus has been found; so that an eye-glance at these Tables will put a Paleontologist in possession of the leading facts of the distribution of the organic types in the successive groups of Strata, as they are enumerated in the Catalogue: not in any hypothetical order, but in that in which they are recorded in Nature’s Book. These Tables are a work of great knowledge and of patient skill; and went far beyond the task of revision intended by the University. The stratigraphical System of nomenclature adopted in this Catalogue is essentially the same with that of Prof. M°Coys Synopsis. It is based upon an actual survey, first made by myself, whereby I approximately determined in N. Wales the order of the older deposits of the whole region, and the natural groups of strata into which they might be separated. This might be called a great but rude problem of solid geometry, to be first solved by an elaborate examination of physical evidence, and without reference to the organic remains in the successive groups. But these groups being once established, on the basis of true observation, we may then proceed to obtain the first chapters of a true history of the succession of organic types, as the tale is told in the successive strata whence they have been derived. And when we have once obtained in any extensive section a true succession of organic types, we may then, as Nature is true to her own workmanship, advance a step farther, and use that succession to help us in making out the order of the Physical groups in cases where they have been imperfectly or obscurely elaborated. Thus we have two great principles of arrangement; first by the actual and laborious observation of the successive physical groups; secondly, by the order of the organic types which have been already established by a reference to the types of some well-known natural section. PREFACE. xiii In determining a Geological nomenclature these two great principles must never be lost sight of—No true nomenclature can be in conflict with the actual succession of the physical deposits ; neither can it contradict the true succession of organic types. Nature does not contradict her own workmanship. This was the principle on which William Smith, whom we call the Father of English Geology, acted; and it was the principle on which Murchison acted when he first made known his beautiful succession in the upper part of (what he taught us to call) his Silurian System. That upper part of his System was thoroughly and beautifully worked out, was accepted at once, and continues to maintain its place. But below the Wenlock shale, in what he called the Lower Silurian groups, his fundamental sections utterly broke down, having no base to rest upon. He never made out the succession of his physical groups: some of them which required separation he confounded, and some he put in an inverted order; and _ thereby he brought an inevitable incongruity into his lists of the Older Paleozoic fossils. In short, I venture to affirm, that the Lower Silurian nomenclature, however widely adopted on the authority of its Author, was false: because it was built upon sections that were untrue to nature; and if this assertion be true—and it is true—the discussion requires no further argument. As a general rule, honest truth and good taste go hand-in-hand; and what can be more incongruous and tasteless than to erase the Classical name of Cambrian as applied to the grand mountain chains of Caernarvonshire and Merionethshire, and to substitute the word Silurian as their designation. This was done by the Author of the “Silurian System,” in the first instance no doubt by mistake, and in the hope of giving a greater extent and firmer basis to his System. But when the great errors of his fundamental groups were discovered, why continue such a monstrous abuse of nomen- clature ? Siluria supplies us neither with the best types of the older groups, nor with any sections which clearly define their succession: Cambria supplies both. Our business here is not to consider what great services the Author may have done in other regions: but to consider whether his work in Lower Siluria be true to nature. The first publication of his grand lists of “Lower Silurian Fossils” was a great boon to Geology; but the assumed stratigraphical arrangement and the grouping of the species has been a great mischief, and a drag upon its progress. I will pursue this subject no farther, but refer the reader to my Introduction to Prof. M’Coy’s Synopsis which I here adopt, because that which is true in a natural arrangement can never be materially changed. Nor should I have introduced even this notice of an old controversy, had it not been revived in an acute, animated, and very elaborate dissertation by Prof. Sterry Hunt (Nature, May 2, 9, and 16, 1872, reprinted from the xiv PREFACE. Canadian Naturalist). And it was high time that a shameful incubus should be shaken off from the breathing organs of the older Palzozoic rocks; and that they should express themselves once again in the language of truth and freedom. Tottering as I now am under the infirmities of old age, with faded senses and a failing memory, I am ill fitted for the part of a gladiator; but after Professor Sterry Hunt's bold and honest vindication of my work in Cambria, it would be on my part an act of moral cowardice, and a want of proper respect for the sanctity of evidence, not thus to speak out in the cause of historic truth and reason. Leaving all controversy for awhile, I may mention some other facts respecting the Cata- logue, which may find a proper notice in this Preface. I never saw the proof-sheets of the Catalogue or superintended its Jong progress through the press. There are consequently a few notices and expressions in it which do not strictly represent my views. The Sections on page 1, and page 3, were made and struck off without any communication with myself, and on Mr Salter’s authority they entirely rest. Instead of the groups Harlech and Longmynd— the second from the base of the Ideal Section on page 1—I should have preferred to write Llanberis, Bangor, and Longmynd Groups, and I should have placed the Harlech Group at the base of the Menevian. The second Section, page 3, has I think considerable value; not as a natural Section, but as a pictorial illustration of the relative position of certain im- portant groups of strata. The third plate, page 9, may be excellent in its way as a small Geological Map; but it is far too complicated for the use of a student unless it had been illustrated by sections. I may here remark generally, that I do not think the Upper and Lower Llandovery Rocks of the Government Survey ought to appear as one group; and I would place the Lower Llandovery at the top of the Cambrian groups, and the Upper Llandovery at the base of the true Silurian Rocks. This is the arrangement justified by the Sections in Den- bighshire: but there is a large extent of country, partly covered by the Upper and Lower Llandovery Rocks, with which I am very imperfectly acquainted, and which is, I think, even now, very inadequately described in the works of the Government Survey. The separation between Cambrian and Silurian Rocks is sometimes defined by a simple line, which shows at once the discordancy of the two deposits. On the contrary, the passage between the two systems is not unusually marked by a great confusion of deposits, by enormous masses of stratified conglomerate violently contorted or set up on edge, which are certain indications of a vast period of time. Many monuments of powerful eleva- tion, abrasion, and dislocation of the rock-masses also mark the long period of time occu- pied in the passage from the Cambrian to the Silurian formations. I do not profess perfectly to understand, or to criticise, the comparative schemes of clas- PREFACE. XV sification and nomenclature given by Mr Salter on page 25. I have a similar, more simple comparative Table, kindly given me by Prof. Morris, which I will not here copy in extenso, as I wish this prefatory notice to be short; but I will copy the first column of his Table, which he believes to represent my scheme of arrangement as well as his own; and with which I wish to make no change; except that I would add the Llanberis Group to the Longmynd and Bangor Groups, and remove the Harlech Group to the base of the Menevian, as before stated. | Ledbury Shales. Upper Upper Ludlow Group. Siunian | Lower Ludlow 5 [ Wenlock - Lower | Lower Wenlock __,, May Hill 55 Upper Bala re , Upper Middle Bala - tL Lower Bala . Arenig or Skiddaw ,, C b Pic g d ambrian | aq Ale Tremadoe “5 Ffestiniog 9 Menevian Be Wace Harlech or Bangor ,, Longmynd 5 If it be asked how the great succession of our Older Paleozoic Rocks was determined, I can only refer to my own individual labours, carried on during many successive years among the older rocks of England. I commenced my task in Wales in 1831, accompanied for a short time by my friend Charles Darwin—a name now well known and honoured in the whole world of science—but other engagements soon drew him away from N. Wales. We laid down the northern boundary of the Carboniferous Limestone together, and I at first purposed to examine the rocks in descending order. But I found in Denbighshire the same interrupted broken masses of Old Red Sandstone which [had so many times noticed between the Carboniferous and the Silurian and Cambrian rocks in the North of England. I therefore despaired of establishing a good base to work upon in that district; and after a short examination of the rocks on both sides of the Menai Straits, I resolved to fix a provisional base-line on the Caernarvon side of the Straits. I soon found that the prevailing strike of the country was about N.N.E.; therefore by xvi PREFACE. following nearly East and West sectional lines, the deposits were discovered in their true relations and sectional order: and commencing nearly on the line of the Holyhead road, I marked all the anticlinal and synclinal fiexures upon a section copied from nature. The vast undulations of the strata, the constant intrusion and alternation of igneous rocks, at first threw some difficulties in my way; but I had learned to encounter them during my previous three years’ labour among the Lake mountains, and I did not find any insurmountable diffi- culties in reading the succession given by each section. In this way I made three parallel nearly East and West traverses. The first from the shores of the Menai, by the great Penrhyn slate-quarries, and so on, by the summits of the high mountains, over the top of Glyder Fawr to the neighbourhood of Capel Curig: the second, by the mountains South of Llanberis, over the top of Snowdon, and thence into the valley above Beddgelert: the third, by a parallel mountain-track, passing over Moel Hebog and ending in the valley below Beddgelert, a little farther to the South-west. On a careful revision of the several sections presented on these three lines, I found that even in the most complicated curves the chief anticlinal and synclinal lines might be brought into an approximately close comparison, so as greatly to assist in the construction of a general section of the country and the establishment of good physical groups. Thus the great synclinal trough of Cwm Idwal, on the first line of section; another synclinal in the second line, within which rests the top of Snowdon; and a third synclinal which underlies the top of Moel Hebog: all affect one group of strata, through which pass the most remarkable fossiliferous beds of the whole Cambrian Series. Taking this as a kind of key-note to guide me in further discoveries I examined the sections in more detail, and made out the relations of their corresponding parts; and before the working season was over (in 1831) I completed an approximate Geological Map from actual survey of nearly the whole of Caernarvonshire. No names were of course given to the natural groups of strata; but the part some of them played in the physical de- velopment of the country was, I thought, clearly established. I have given these details to shew the honest and very laborious way in which I set about my work. I had, in truth, little difficulty in reading the sections, as their language was written in characters almost identical with those I had long studied in the Cumbrian mountains. The base-line on the shores of the Menai was broken and imperfect; and its associa- tion, made in after years by the Government Survey and by myself, with the Longmynd rocks, was, I think, partly hypothetical. But along each line of section, above described, I had found a magnificent, and, on the whole, an ascending series of deposits, of grand features and of enormous thickness, PREFACE. XVil Karly next summer I resumed my task in Wales. Crossing the depression in which my sections had terminated, I pushed them forward towards the East, nearly at right angles to the strike of the strata; and in the progress of my work, discovered the great Merioneth-Anti- clinal, which I have often called the backbone of Wales. It brings out the oldest strata which were first seen near the coast of the Menai; and assuming it as our base, we can count off towards the East an enormous series of ascending strata capped by the whole Bala group; and from the same base-line we can count off all the groups of the three sections observed in the preceding year, first in ascending, and then in descending order, till we meet the same basic groups as we approach the shores of the Menai. Having thus obtained a key-note to the harmonious grouping of the strata, and having practically become acquainted with some of the most important physical groups, I under- took what proved to be the severest summer’s task of my Geological life; namely, the interpretation and partial delineation of the order and principal flexures of all the older deposits of the counties of Merioneth, Montgomery, and Denbigh. A brief synopsis, illustrated by sections of what I had effected in Caernarvonshire, was laid before the British Association, at one of their evening meetings held at Oxford in the year 1832. I had no doubt about the great groups or about the great flexures and faults by which some of them were repeated again and again in the same county. I never had a Geological secret in my long life. Nearly all my best work in Wales was done in solitude, and was therefore my own. My first groups continue unchanged and unmodified; with the exception of certain changes introduced by recent discoveries, such as the Menevian group, which now forms a group subordinate to the Lingula Flags; and I hesitate not to affirm that the grand and well-connected succession of deposits which I unfolded between the Menai and the top of the Berwyn chain is unrivalled by any other European Section, of the same age, hitherto described by Geologists. The Cambrian sections have this crowning honour; and are rivalled in their succession and physical development only by the magnificent series of Paleozoic rocks discovered by the Geologists of North America. What sense therefore has there been in excluding the Mountains of Wales from their proper physical importance in the Geology of our own Island by sinking them and colouring them as Lower Silurian? The groups of the Lower Silurian System of Sir R. I. Murchison, (even had their place and age not been utterly mistaken by their Author,) would not have deserved the prominent notice they have held in the nomenclature of English groups; for they generally want the essential condition of good typical groups. They de not shew any true relation to the groups above them and below them. For my own convenience I had made an agreement with the Author of the Silurian System, at the Edinburgh Meeting of the British Association, in 1834, to wait till he had € XViii PREFACE. finished the result of his labours, which I expected to appear in a well-illustrated volume in course of the year following. But having waited, as I thought, too long for the appear- ance of the “Silurian System,” I gave up my sketches, day-books, and _ field-books (I think in 1837) to my honoured friend Mr Lonsdale, then the Assistant-Secretary of the Geological Society, and out of these documents he made a series of sections upon a grand scale, which shewed the extent, and many of the details, of my work in North Wales. These sections were exhibited and explained by myself to the Geological Society at one of their evening meetings, and remained in their possession for many years. The last time I saw them they were in the hands of Mr Warburton, who had undertaken to reduce to a state fit for publication the papers on North Wales, which described the labours of Mr Salter and myself in the years 1842—3, and he had obtained Mr Lonsdale’s larger sections for assistance in this work. In order to give coherence to my scattered remarks on the older rocks of North Wales, I will first mention in chronological order the chief periods during which I investigated the structure of the Principality. My best work, I think, was done in the summers of 1831 and 1832, in the manner above stated. In the spring and summer of 1833 my health broke down so much that I was incapable of taking the field till the autumnal season, when it was far too late for me to attempt the great and difficult task I had proposed to myself— namely, of commencing with the South flank of Cader Idris, and thence, by numerous long traverses, connecting my work in North Wales with the typical Silurian country on the banks of the Towey”. After studying the Sections which were laid by Murchison before the British Association in 1833, I felt convinced that there was an overlap between the Systems of Cambria and Siluria (as they were afterwards called), and we agreed to settle this question next year by a joint tour through the most typical portions of the Silurian country, which had been, during the preceding years, examined, mapped, and described in considerable detail. By this joint labour we hoped to clear up some points of difficulty, and to establish a good line of demarcation between our Groups of Strata. We commenced our work (in 1834) by various hasty traverses in the typical Silurian country, which stretches on both banks of the Towey. At first we had no matter of controversy, for I accepted at once my friend’s interpretation of his own Sections. I did not go to dispute, but to learn as it were the alphabet of the Silurian tongue. My * The autumn of that year was however not without its fruit: for accompanied and assisted by the present Astronomer Royal and Dr Whewell, afterwards Master of Trinity College, I made out in considerable detail the structure of Charnwood Forest, and determined the range of its single anticlinal axis; in following which towards the North we found that it brought up at a high angle of elevation two singular masses of dolomitized Carboniferous Limestone; but out of the line of disturbance the Limestone regained its ordinary type. PREFACE. barbs friend had a Government Map of the Country we first glanced at, well marked and coloured, with references to his previous labours. I had been disappointed in my hope of procuring the map of the Geographical Survey as I passed through London, and I had no map what- ever with me of that part of the country; but I gradually learnt, on the spot, to understand what were the characters of such groups of Strata as were afterwards known to all British Geologists by the names Caradoc and Llandeilo rocks. As we advanced northwards and passed the limits of the published Ordnance map, | could then turn to good account my old field map; and when I found myself among the rocks I had hastily examined in the year 1832, I readily accepted my friend’s interpretation of the calcareous beds of Meifod, of the calcareous bands among the undulating rocks be- tween Meifod and Llanfyllin, and the still more astonishing groups which are displayed be- tween the Tannat and the Ceiriog. In these districts all the calcareous bands were counted as Caradoc. But my scepticism was alarmed before we reached the Ceiriog; because the calcareous bands, which descend from the northern end of the Berwyn chain into the valley of the Ceiriog—ranging about E.S.E., and nearly at right angles to the strike of the northern Berwyns—appeared to me, on almost certain evidence, to be only branches given off from Bala limestone. Here was a great difficulty. For if the Glyn Ceiriog limestone could not be separated from the calcareous bands we had left behind us, and if they were Caradoc, this limestone must be also Caradoc: and the natural conclusion drawn from my Sections was, that the Caradoc sandstone was exactly on the same parallel with the Bala limestone. But how could this be reconciled with the Silurian Sections of Murchison? For on his scheme, both the Caradoe and the Llandeilo groups were several thousand feet above the Bala limestone and its associated calcareous slates. To settle this difficulty we retraced our steps to Liangynog; and from thence we crossed the Berwyn Chain, marking its structure and the synclinal position of the Bala limestone by the way: and so we descended to some highly fossiliferous quarries in the limestone, which I had examined two years before. There we parted, never to meet again in North Wales. I gave my friend all the chief localities of the Bala limestone, in its long range towards the South-Eastern flank of the Jader Idris group. He did follow the line of the Bala limestone; but he gave me no information respecting his labours or his discoveries; nor did he tell me then, nor did I ever know, before the publication of the “Silurian System,” that every species of the Bala Limestone fossils, which we collected together, and all of which he carried away for examination, were well-known Caradoc species. We met, however, again after the end of the same summer, at Edinburgh, during the meeting of the British Association, and I naturally enquired what had been the success of my c2 XX PREFACE. friend’s excursion along the strike of the Bala Limestone, and whether he had seen reason to make any change of position among his typical groups. He replied that he had followed the Limestone as far as the South-East flank of Cader Idris; and that he had no change to make in the position and relations of his fundamental groups (the Caradoc and Llandeilo) ; in short, that after careful re-examination of his Sections and Classifications, he had no mistake to correct. I had nothing to oppose to this, except my great surprise; and after reconsidering, for a while, my own Sections, I informed him, at the time of our discussion, that I could think of no place for his lower Silurian groups, unless they had disappeared among the rocks at the northern end of Berwyns, along the line of unconformable junction; either by an overlap of the upper or true Silurian rocks of Denbighshire, or, by some mistake of mine, in appre- ciating the calcareous and fossil-bearing groups, I had seen along that line: and to illustrate my view, I drew a rough outline sketch to shew how it was possible to interpolate, at the Northern end of the Berwyn and Glyn Ceiriog range, some beds, which might be higher than the Bala group, and on the parallel of the Caradoc sandstone. But I did this not with any view that my rough sketch should be published: for it was but an artifice to escape from a very great difficulty. It was in itself improbable, and it was based upon the asswmp- tion that the Lower Silurian Sections were true. Assuming this as a fact, I suggested, as a mere hypothesis, that the two groups, Caradoc and Llandeilo, might be concealed, or perhaps obscurely represented along the great line of discordant junction, which separated my Cam- brian from his true Silurian rocks, in Denbighshire. Such is the history of that Section which appears with my name affixed to it, at the North-East end of the great map of the “Silurian System.” The author of that map had no authority from me to publish the hypothetical sketch. It may appear strange that I should think it worth while thus to dwell upon a minute point which is now seldom seen or thought of; but it was, in fact, the very pivot on which my dispute with Sir R. I. Murchison turned. After we parted at the rich fossil-quarry near Bala, we never had one single syllable of correspondence respecting the older Paleozoic rocks of North Wales; nor did I again explore a single quarry of those rocks till full eight years had passed away. But, as before stated, the great work, the “Silurian System,” appeared in the early summer of 1839; and when I saw my hypothetical Section entered upon the map, with my name affixed to it, I thought I had some right to be offended at this liberty: for the author had invited me to colour that part of his map which was east of the Berwyn chain; and this I refused to do, on the ground of my incompetency, at that time, to colour the country correctly; and I should have given unquestionably a like refusal, if he had alluded to the sketch above described. My mistake was in believing, on the authority of their author, that the lower Silurian Sections PREFACE. xxi were correct. I did not, however, mean to let the matter rest, but to re-examine the whole Paleozoic question as soon after the publication of the Silurian System as I could find a long vacation at my command. After I had parted with my friend near Bala in 1834, I thought the rest of the summer well employed in making traverses through the true Silurian rocks of Denbighshire, and in partially exploring the Carboniferous rocks of Denbighshire and Flintshire. In 1835 I spent some time in exploring the North of Ireland, after the breaking-up of the British Association at Dublin. It had been confidently asserted during the Meeting, that our Geological theories were put to open shame by the Culm-Measures of North Devon, which (though containing beds of coal and many true Carboniferous fossil plants) were in fact interpolated among the oldest Slate rocks; and that the Geological Society were discredited in not having given a proper prominence to this notorious fact. In these expressions of vituperation, a challenge seemed directed personally to Murchi- son and myself, which we accepted with perfect goodwill. Accordingly, we visited the Northern Coast of North Devon next year, and resolved, if possible, to determine what was the true position of the Culm-Measures. We had no difficulty in making out the Natural groups of Strata, which presented themselves in a traverse from the extreme Northern Coast to the dark coloured limestone, which ranges a little South of Barnstaple, and crosses a great part of the County in a direction nearly East and West. Our attempt was at length quite successful. The Culm-Measures were proved to be the highest rocks of North Devon, and though anomalous in many of their mineralogical details, they were by no means anomalous in their position; for the calcareous bands which appeared along their northern and their southern base, were but one of the forms of the Carboniferous limestone. But what were the groups of Slate rocks, which rose from beneath the Culm-Measures, and were exhibited in various undulations, ranging nearly East and West between the parallel of Barnstaple and the northern shores of Devon? The fossils in these groups exhibited some forms that were then unknown to us. But the highest group of all, which we will call the Barnstaple group, was eminently fossiliferous, and was pronounced by Murchison to belong to the Caradoc sandstone. We collected from this group a good series of organic remains, and sent them to Mr Sowerby; and not long afterwards my fellow-labourer received a dispatch from Mr Sowerby, which informed him that he had made a correct determination of the age of the Barnstaple fossils. I was little satisfied with this determination, which virtually cost me the work of two Long Vacations in the years 1837 and 1838. In 1837 I was joined for a short time in South Devon by my friend Mr Godwin-Austen, and we did not quite complete any part of our survey, both being unexpectedly called away. But during a long Summer of 1838 I worked XXII PREFACE. almost in solitude. I completed my traverses in North Devon and South Devon, and I traced Fossil-bearing Strata on the South-eastern Coast of Cornwall; and then doubling round from Penzance to the Northern Coast of the County, I obtained fossils partly by digging them from the rocks, and parily as gifts from my friends; and continued my way till I found myself once again among the rich Fossil-bearing quarries of Petherwin. Late in the autumn of 1838 I brought back with me good sectional and paleontological evidence, which seemed to prove that nearly all the groups in the two Counties I had examined were of an older date than the Carboniferous rocks of North Devon, and of a newer date than the newest rocks in the system of Siluria. When I expounded this evidence to Murchison, he opposed it by a succession of ingenious hypotheses, which could not however stand against the simple evidence of my Sections. But to settle this point for ever, I proposed that we should adjourn to the house of Mr Sowerby, and, if possible, re-examine the hamper of fossils we had sent to him in the year 1836. The hamper was found in the exact state in which we had last seen it; nor do I believe that Mr Sowerby had ever opened it. However that might be; on opening the hamper, we saw a very good series of Devon Fossils with well-marked localities; but we saw nothing resembling a characteristic Caradoc species. Thus the Devonian System gradually became established, and the results from Sectional and Fossil evidence were in per- fect harmony; and thus we took the first step, which I followed up in subsequent years; and much good work has been done since among the rocks of that series. The next year formed an epoch in the history of European Geology; for in the early part of 1839 the “Silurian System” was first published. It was beautifully embellished and contained an accurate delineation and description of the most ancient Palozoic Fossils of a large portion of Wales and some of the adjoining counties, such as had never before appeared in any Geological work. For it professed to arrange the lists of Fossils and the Groups of Strata in a true order of superposition. It had cost the Author seven years’ field labour, and he was assisted by three distinguished naturalists in determining the classification and the nomenclature of his multitudinous fossils. It is no part of my duty to attempt a task far beyond my power—yvyiz. to assign the proportional honours due to each of the scientific workmen who had contributed to the great work. But the chief honour will ever be given to the author of the System, who brought the materials together and arranged them in that manner in which they are seen in his splendid work. Under his hands the older Paleozoic Geology had assumed a new and a nobler type, and the highest praise was given to his work in all the scientific Journals of Europe and the United States; and as years advanced new honours accumulated on the author's head. During the summer of the same year (1839), I joined my friend in a visit to the Rhenish Provinces and the North of Germany, for the purpose of following out those PREFACE. XXiil conclusions respecting the Devonian System which we had arrived at the preceding year, chiefly through my personal labours. Our summer work suffered a considerable retardation from a premature attempt (sanctioned by no less a personage than Prof. A. Goldfuss of Bonn) to classify the fossils of the Hifel Limestone with those of the Upper Silurian Groups; but before the expiration of the summer we escaped from this difficulty; and as our joint labour has been published, it would be idle for me to dwell upon it any longer in this Preface. For nearly three months during the Academic vacation of 1840, I was confined by my duties in the Cathedral of Norwich, and was therefore cut off from any extensive field work: but within the limits of the vacation, guided by the Silurian map, I made some hasty excursions which brought to the Cambridge Museum what I then regarded as a rich harvest of fossils. The year 1841 was partly employed by me in studying the Devonian rocks of Ireland under the guidance of my friend Sir Richard Griffith; and from Ireland I passed into Scotland, still in quest of facts that might give me the means of constructing a classifica- tion which would apply to every portion of the older rocks of Great Britain; but neither during that nor during any other tour did I find anything to compare with, much less to supersede, the magnificent succession of groups which I had seen in Wales and Siluria. I resolved therefore to re-examine the whole of my work in Wales, and then to perform the same task among the Lake mountains and the districts bordering upon them. In this way I endeavoured to bring the several Paleozoic Groups into good co-ordination, and to name the lower portion of them in conformity with the system of Cambria, and the upper portion in like manner in conformity with the system of Siluria. This task I hoped to complete in two hardworking summers; but I found to my cost that I had greatly underrated the labour that was before me. In 1842, with Mr Sowerby’s permission, I was joined by Mr Salter, as a youthful and then joyous fellow-labourer, and especially as one well prepared, to complete the fossil catalogues of the several groups which we had to examine. This task employed us during two entire hardworking summers. At the end of the summer of 1843, we had done our work thoroughly, as I then thought; for my previous labours in North Wales enabled me to conduct my young friend and assistant to all the localities of principal interest, with small loss of time in seeking them out. For a few days in 1842, we were joined by Sir Richard Griffith; and I will here state, in as few words as I can, the results of this joint work of two summers. My youthful and cheerful companion gradually became a good field surveyor, and he dressed up my Sections so as to make them fit for publication, of course on a reduced scale, and he was of infinite use in fortifying the conclusions [ derived from my comparative XXxiV PREFACE. Sections; by his admirable and ready knowledge of the characteristic fossil species we obtained from them. The hypothesis (supra, page xx), either of an overlap somewhere along the unconformable junctions of the Cambrian and Silurian rocks of Denbighshire, or of a mistake committed by myself in naming some of the fossiliferous groups which appear near that junction, was proved at once to be without meaning. I had made no mistakes of the kind, nor did we find any great mistake in any of my old sections among the mountains of Caernarvonshire and Merionethshire. My work of 1831—32 was right in principle, and withstood our renewed test. We examined in great detail the two lines of the Bala Limestone, caused by synclinal flexure, securing our work by tracing both beds along their strike, and in this way we demonstrated, that the more eastern limestone bands in the Llanwddyn valley were identical with the eastern bands that cross the road, between Bala and Llangynog, as before stated. We also carefully mapped a part of the country east and north of the Northern Berwyns; and we completed in great detail sections which connected the Silurian rocks south of the Tannat, and north of the Ceiriog, shewing the emergence of the old Cambrian rocks which pass through the intervening country and form the highest crests of the Berwyns. We also examined the great fault SE. of Llanwddyn, which produces an entire inversion of the strata through a range of several miles. This fact I had first observed in 1832, and had verified it by following the inverted beds along their strike till they had regained their normal position, and we found that we had no corrections to make in this portion of my old Sections of 1832. I mention these facts only to shew how conscientiously our work was done. We sought the truth, and would have embraced it, to whatever conclusions it might lead us. The work done by Mr Salter and myself in 1842-43 seemed to bring to a happy end my labours among the higher mountains of North Wales; for I had re-examined all the essential parts of my old Sections, and all my groups of strata, assisted by Mr Salter in the field, and still more in the closet, by his lists of the fossils we had collected. There was no great or fatal mistake in any of my older details, and we came away rejoicing in the thought that we had done our work effectually and to a good purpose. But a very hard task remained: how were we to join our detailed work to that of the Silurian System? It appeared evident, at a glance, that the two were on some points incompatible. If our work were true, there must be some very great error lurking among the Lower Silurian Groups. How was it to be discovered? I meant to have undertaken the task myself the next year: but a serious illness compelled me to spend the summer of 1844 at one of the German baths, and in no part of that summer, or of the autumnal months, was I capable of taking the field as a Geologist. But my young friend and fellow-labourer, Mr Salter, had, with Mr Sowerby’s consent, a commission from myself to examine the Llandeilo Flags PREFACE. =_— North of Builth, and to ascertain their relation to the chain of Mynedd-Epynt; and especially to ascertain whether the Llandeilo Flags were to be placed above or below the conglomerates of Dol-Fan, which ran into a remarkable chain, now I believe regarded as upper Llandovery rocks. He was then a very youthful observer, and had not learned to trust himself, when the phenomena before him seemed to contradict the opinions of those whom he considered of high authority. He brought back to me, however, at the end of the summer, a very elaborate Report, from which after its perusal I could derive no definite result; and some years afterwards it was returned to its author, who confessed that it was erroneous, and I believe destroyed it. I spent the whole summer following (1845) in going over a part of my old work in Cumberland, Westmorland, and North Lancashire, endeavouring to bring the rocks above the Coniston Limestone (the equivalent of the Bala) into some accordance with the Groups of the Upper and true Silurian System. There could be no doubt that the Limestones of Bala and Coniston were of the same age. The fossils were numerous and almost identical in species. It was equally certain that the highest groups of the Westmorland Slate rocks, that overhang the Valley of the Lune near Kirkby Lonsdale, were on a parallel with the upper Ludlow rocks, as seen near the banks of the Towey: but how to bring the intervening groups into strict comparison with the successive upper Silurian Groups, was a task which I have never, to this day, performed to my entire satisfaction. I mention these facts in their order, with no motives I trust of personal vanity; but to prove with what steady perseverance I went on with the task that was before me. My object, from the first, had been to write a general work upon all the Paleozoic Rocks of England and Wales; and with this object still in view I went on from year to year, accumu- lating materials, which at length became too much for my sustaining powers. I had been much interrupted for many successive years by attacks of suppressed gout, and by very alarming attacks of congestion of the head; and at length the infirmities of old age had gathered round me before I had put my work in order. I will, however, leave this digression and come back to my Cambrian task. So far my present Preface has been associated with many happy and bright remem- brances—social and physical. What is about to follow will be less satisfactory to the reader; and will be associated in my memory with acts which very painfully affected me with involuntary distrust of some whom I had counted among my best and dearest friends, and threw a moral shade over all the latter years of my Geological life. It will perhaps be said that after the death of Sir Roderick Impey Murchison and Mr Warburton, it is wrong to revive the controversy I had with them, as I have already d XXV1 PREFACE. published my vindication in the Introduction to M’Coy’s Synopsis. But very few men indeed ever have an opportunity of reading that Introduction; for it is a portion of a large and expensive volume, which has very seldom been purchased since the wide diffusion of the volumes of the Paleontographical Society. On the contrary the statements of my opponents are to be seen in the Proceedings and Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, which form part of the Library stock of every country town in which Geology is held in practical honour. Moreover, the controversy has recently been revived with great spirit and with great talent by Prof. Sterry Hunt, F.R.S. &c., of the Canadian Survey; and I think that, under such circumstances, it would be a shameful act of moral cowardice not to speak out in my own vindication, when I can do so in the simplest words of truth and reason. I will then do my best to state the historic truth in all simplicity and without favour or affection. Not to speak plain truth of those who are dead, while engaged in a personal vindication of truth involving questions of fact, would be destructive of the very essence and marrow of all history. First then regarding Sir R. I. Murchison. He attended several, and I think all, of the Meetings during 1842—43, when the papers by Mr Salter and myself were read before the Geological Society: but, so far as I remember, he never made a single remark or comment during these long readings, though the subjects discussed in them affected his own works as much as mine. But very soon after the final reading of the Papers (towards the end of the year 1843) a geological map was published in his name, in which he had brushed out of sight, under a deep Silurian colour, every trace of my previous work in North Wales. This was done so quietly and silently that I never heard one whisper of it till the fact was made known to me by Mr Knipe (I think in 1851), when he called on me with a newly coloured Geological Map of England, which he had on sale. The exact date is not however material to my present purpose. Was this right or was it wrong? and was it for the interests of truth in Science? On this subject I make no further remark, but refer the reader to the Introduction to M°Coy’s Synopsis, and to a Paper published by myself in the Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society in 1852. About the same time that Murchison had thus completed his new colouring of the map of Wales*, Mr Warburton, then President of the Geological Society, most kindly, as I thought, offered to reduce the successive communications of Mr Salter and myself, embracing the labours of the two preceding summers, into a state fit for publication. Certainly my Papers * This map was not, I believe, published in any work connected with the Geological Society; but in the Atlas of the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, where it lurked I believe out of my sight for more than seven years. PREFACE. watt required revision. Each of them had been written by myself in a slovenly and hasty manner; and must at least be united and copied out again before they could be printed. Most willingly therefore all my papers, and all my sections greatly improved by the graceful touch of Salter's pen, and all his own beautiful sections and sketches, were placed without reserve in the hands of Mr Warburton. But what took place after this surrender of the papers? Mr Warburton commenced his task of Reduction and very soon became involved in difficulties (as I learned from notes of enquiry sent by himself) obviously arising out of his want of knowledge of the physical structure of North Wales; and I entreated him to send me the proof-sheets, that I might be sure he understood the drift and meaning of the papers he held in charge. But he refused me the sight of any single proof-sheet, though I applied to him again and again, with increased energy after his repeated denials. At length the Reduction was printed in the Proceedings of the Geological Society; and afterwards in the first volume of the Quarterly Journal. The sections were so much obscured by a complicated notation, which I never well understood, and by the minuteness of the scale of their Reduction, that I was never able completely to comprehend any one of them. All our new Sections on the east side of the Berwyns were so mutilated as to be quite worthless: and instead of reproducing any of the elaborate and accurate work we had traced upon the map of the Government Survey, he first produced the Reduction of a worthless map, which was drawn upon no scale, but had been sketched by a provincial artist to illustrate a private lecture. A second map, in illustration of my papers, which appeared soon afterwards in the first volume of the Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, was practically very little better than the former; and it was so overcrowded by ill-understood details as to be almost worthless. I did however hope that my original Papers, and the Sections jointly made by Salter and myself would be, in the end, returned, agreeably to the President's promise. But it was a vain hope—The greatest number of our Papers and Sections were never returned at all; and the few pages of manuscript text which did come back to me were all in the same state of mutilation, which made them absolutely useless for any purpose of verification. It is no easy matter to explain an overbearing treatment such as I have described: but I believe Mr Warburton undertook his task for the express purpose of bringing my Papers into harmony with Murchison’s scheme of covering all the older recks of North and South Wales with Silurian colours. For in his Reductions he again and again contrived to change my language, and make me write in a new Silurian tongue. Was this fair and honest dealing with me? I do not venture to affirm that Sir R. I. Murchison was a party to this unwarrantable dealing of Mr Warburton; but he unquestionably was ready to turn it to his own profit. d 2 XXVili PREFACE. They were, at the time, in the closest daily communication; and it is also true that Murchison’s expansion of his Silurian colours over all the older rocks of Wales, and Warburton’s strange mangling of our Papers and Sections, took place very nearly at the same time; namely, just after our Communications to the Geological Society respecting the work done in 1842—43 had been completed. With all the faults of the Reductions it was obvious that Mr Warburton had laboured hard at my Papers and Sections; and perhaps done his best to put them into a sys- tematic form; and on that account I was willing, after I got over my first sorrow (and it was a very great sorrow, to endure the loss of perhaps the best two years’ labours of my Geological life), to excuse some of his blunders, and to overlook the overbearing manner in which he had treated me. The case seemed without remedy, and I made no further movement in connection with it; and the matter would probably have passed away without any further notice from myself, had I not after the lapse of about 7 years received that information from Mr Knipe to which I have alluded in a former page (supra, p. xxvi). By that information I was at once convinced that I should be wanting in moral courage, and fail in doing what the truth of history required of me, if I did not claim my right position, as the first interpreter of the Cambrian Sections. And with these feelings I recorded in a Paper, read before the Geological Society in the year 1852, the result of a new examination of my original Papers, and a condensed abstract of what I had written connected with a previous controversy with Sir R. I. Murchison; and upon these historical details an argument was built which appeared to me incontrovertible’. While writing under such circumstances some little excess of temper might I think have been expected. But in my present judgment, formed after a re-examination made in the calmness and serenity of old age, there was no want of temper in my Paper. It was full of matter, and I think fairly argued. It was, however, very il received by the Geolo- gical Society; and all who took a part in the proceedings of the evening seemed to make it a point of honour to maintain every position which had been claimed in the works of Murchison. A week or two after the reading of this Paper I received a formal notifi- cation from the Secretary of the Geological Society, that the Council had passed a decree to extrude my Paper absolutely from their Quarterly Journal. They soon, however, found that this suppression of my Paper was impossible; for the new Volume, containing the offending Paper, had found its way partially before the public, and I had received the usual Author’s presentation copies of my Paper. * Murchison had previously claimed the Bala Group as Silurian, against which I entered my protest; and after some discussion I offered a compromise: viz. that of calling the Bala Group—Cambro-Silurian. This compromise was rejected by Murchison, and was afterwards withdrawn by myself. PREFACE. eae The Council, however, repeated their blow in another form; and they passed a Resolution whereby I was forbidden to bring before them any Paper involving the Classification and Nomenclature of our older Paleozoic rocks. I thought that a Resolution, so unwise and so deeply injurious to myself, could never be sternly acted on; and would perhaps soon be forgotten. But experience taught me the contrary. It was acted upon with stern severity; and I was, after the expiration of about two years, compelled to withdraw from the Meetings of the Society; which I could not attend with any proper regard to my own honour while such a personal stigma was allowed by its Council to remain on my name. I ought at the moment to have struck my name from its lists; but I could not bear the thought of taking a final leave of a Society, which for many years was almost my home in London, and in which I had spent many of the happiest hours of my life, and formed some of my most cherished friendships”. The attempt. to suppress my Paper, which had been subject to all previous formalities of Reference, and had actually passed through the Press, was a personal stigma unexampled, I believe, in the history of any other Philosophical Society in London. More than twenty years have, I believe, passed away since the bitter Resolution of the Council was recorded in the books of the Geological Society, and most of my opponents have been removed by the hand of death from the gocd and evil of this world. But there is still a Council of the Geological Society, far removed from the feelings of irritation (whether just or unjust) which produced the stern censure of the Paper to which I have alluded; and I venture to challenge them, though now in a feeble voice, to re-peruse my old Paper and to produce from it a single paragraph or sentence which was unfit for me to write, or for the Council to read, and in any way justified the condemnation that had been passed upon it. It is to me a thought full of melancholy, and of misgiving for the cause of honest truth, when I find that some of our best Geologists are even now vainly contriving, by buttresses and underpinnings, to lend support to the lower sections of the Silurian System ; which were untrue to nature from the beginning, both in their whole conception and in the elaboration of their details: and doing this while they turn their faces away from * After the attacks alluded to above, I continued occasionally to attend the Meetings of the Geological Society, and read one or two papers before them on different subjects. I did however twice trespass on the forbidden ground of Paleozoic Nomenclature. My first offending paper was arrested by the President (Professor Forbes was, I think, that evening in the Chair) as touching on forbidden matter. Lastly in October, 1854, a paper, of which I was the author, was partially read before the Society; but an essential part of it was not read that evening. When this came to my knowledge I withdrew the paper; and it was afterwards published (I think in extenso) in the Philosophical Magazine and Annals of Philosophy. This led the President, Mr Hamilton, into a severe comment, to which I replied in the above-named Journal; and so ended for ever a personal connection with the Geological Society, which ought to have ended two years sooner, XK PREFACE. another System which had fixed its base in truth and reason, which had perfect Geo- graphical congruity, and undoubted priority of date; and which appeals to them still in a language they cannot misunderstand, if they will read their lesson in the very order in which the Author of Nature has recorded it. It may perhaps be objected to me that all or nearly all that has been stated in this Preface has appeared before in the Introduction to M*Coy’s Synopsis, or in the various Papers which have been printed in my name; especially in the Proceedings and Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society, or in the Philosophical Magazine and Annals of Philosophy. But certainly they were never printed before in a form so connected and historical as in the statements of this Preface. With the solemnity becoming my old age and a conviction, forced upon me by my infirmities, that I shall never again be able to address the Public upon any subject connected with the scientific labours of my former life, I dare to affirm that the Geological Society had not a more true-hearted and loyal member than myself. The stigma fixed upon me by the Council of the Geological Society was the greatest sorrow of my old age. I never endeavoured to deprive any brother Geologist of what was his due, nor did I claim for myself any scrap of knowledge for which I could not make good my title. My Maps and Sections literally were public property, Prof. Phillips had the use of my field-work in Cumberland, when he was preparing one of his Volumes and Maps for Publication; and Mr Greenough had my Papers and Maps in his possession for weeks together, and on several successive occasions. Such details may seem but ill fitted for the pages of this Preface; but I write as one who has endured, and is still enduring, the unmerited censure of a scientific body; and who for the last time is writing in defence of his conduct as an author. At what time the grand mistakes in the fundamental Sections of the Silurian System were first discovered, and by whom first published, is to me still unknown. I gradually made out the mistakes for myself, after clinging to the first typical Lower Silurian Groups longer than I ought to have done. I never was in the real confidence of my old com- panion and fellow-labourer after we parted in 1834 at the quarry, in the Bala Limestone, at the Western base of the Northern Berwyns (supra, p. xix). Conclusion. Having finished all that can with propriety be called a Preface to the following Cata- logue, I will endeavour to address a few words to the resident members of the University. I can never again hope to address the Public at the length I have done in this Preface; for I feel the infirmities of old age, yearly, I might almost say daily, pressing PREFACE. XXxi more and more upon me, and bringing me nearer, sensibly nearer, to my last resting-place in this world. I write not sorrowfully or despondingly. I wish to address my dear and honoured friends in Cambridge in words of hope and cheerfulness. But first of all let me thank the Author of my being for having so long upheld my life in heart and hope since I first began my residence in this University. There were three prominent hopes which possessed my heart in the earliest years of my Professorship. First, that I might be enabled to bring together a Collection worthy of the University, and illustrative of all the departments of the Science it was my duty to study and to teach. Secondly, that a Geological Museum might be built by the University, amply capable of containing its future Collections; and lastly, that I might bring together a Class of Students who would listen to my teaching, support me by their sympathy, and help me by the labour of their hands. It now makes me happy to say, that all these hopes have for many years been amply realized. It is to me no small delight to look back on the many past years when the Heads of Colleges were my sole Auditors; when we held our annual and most cheerful festive meetings on the first of May; and rejoiced over a dinner, very sumptuously provided by the Vice- Chancellor, in accordance with the express words of Dr Woodward’s Will. And we all acknowledged our Founder's judgment in this festive clause of his Will. For it greatly helped to preserve a Collection, made by him in the seventeenth century, in that integrity in which it is seen to this day in one of the closets of our Museum. On these occasions it was my duty to expound to my Auditors the annual additions made to our Collection, and the necessity there was for a more ample Museum. I was fed by good hopes, and (like many others who have tasted that food) I had to feed only upon hopes, so far as regarded the new Museum, for more than a quarter of a century. But my labour was its own reward. It gave me health, and led me into scenes of grandeur, which taught me to feel in my heart that I was among the works of the great Creator, the Father of all worlds, material or moral; and the Ordainer of those laws out of which spring all phenomena within the ken of our senses or the apprehension of our minds. I know there are men who deny the sound teaching of this lesson; but I thank God that I had been taught, from my early life, to accept these lessons as a part of God’s truth; and it was my delightful task to point out year by year to my Geological Class, the wonderful manner in which the materials of the Universe were knit together, by laws which proved to the understanding and heart of man, that a great, living, intellectual, and active Power must be the creative Head of the sublime and beautiful adjustments and harmonies of the Universe. Still nearer to us, and on that account more impressive, are the adaptations of organ xxxii PREFACE. to organ in every living being, great or small: and in all their complexity still governed by law, and most nicely adapted to material nature, and to all the subtle elements within which God has placed them. How feeble I always felt myself whenever I touched upon subjects such as these! But my Class always heard me with respectful attention: for I did not introduce these subjects too often, nor did I dwell upon them too long. And I sometimes ventured to conduct my Class to thoughts of a still higher aim, connected with that being—Man—the last in order of creation, and made in the image of the Author of his being. Seeing that Man has the gift of prescience (small it may be, and vanishing from thought at once when we think of the Omniscient Prescience of God)—that he can design and contrive implements for his own use and of the nicest skill, which will give him new powers over material nature, and make him acquainted with things furthest removed from the ken of sense— the greatest and the least things accessible to the sight of man—that he has the capacity of abstract thought, and is capable of forming language, and making others understand it— that, using this as an implement of imagination, he can evolve thoughts which act upon the most powerful emotions of the heart, and fill the soul with images of glory—that he can invent another language of a mighty but far different power, which shuts out the imagi- nation, and deals only with the abstractions of pure reason—and that through the might of this new language, and working with it among the elements of pure reason, he can logically grasp results inaccessible to any other implements of human thought—that he can tell the ever-enduring speed at which light (the first-born of heaven) travels through astral space, and count the number of its waves—that working with this logic of pure reason he can tell the astronomer to lift up his telescope to a certain point in the sky and there behold a planet never before seen by the eye of man. That Man in his animal nature is to be counted but as one in the great kingdom of things endowed with life, we at once admit; but that in the functions and powers of his intellect (here just touched on by my feeble hand) he is absolutely removed from any co-ordination with the lower beings of Nature, is, I firmly believe, one of the most certain of well apprehended truths. We all admit that Nature is governed by law: but can we believe that a being like man is nothing but the final evolution of organic types worked out by the mere action of material causes? How are such organic evolutions to account for our sense of right and wrong, of justice, of law, of cause and effect, and of a thousand other abstractions which separate man from all the other parts of the animal world; and make him, within the limits of his duty, prescient and responsible. The facts and sentiments connected with that which marks Humanity,—the works of man’s hands, the visions of his eyes, the aspirations of his heart—appear to me utterly PREFACE. XXXIli abhorrent from the dogmas of materialistic Pantheism. I never could be content, while thinking of such things, to feel myself dangling in mid-air without a resting-point for the sole of my foot. The true resting-point is a reception both in heart and head of a great . First Cause—the one God—the Creator of all worlds, and of all things possessing life. Here we have found a true resting-place and heart’s content; and so we are led to feel the sanctity and nobility of Truth, under all the forms in which it shews itself, to rejoice in its possession, and to honour it as the gift of God. What does the Pantheist give us? A day of uncertain light, of uncertain joy, and a night of eternal darkness. But a better teaching tells us that there is a God who is the Father of the universe, and careth for all His creatures: and if we have listened to a still higher teaching, we can believe that as all the world of Nature has been progressive, so the life of man, and the labours of man, are not to end here, but are to lead him to a brighter and more glorious existence. And there is a_ higher teaching still, very near to us, even in our own heart and conscience:—an emanation of holy light from the Fountain-head of all light—toward which I am permitted but to take one glance while winding up this concluding address. And may our Maker grant that His holy light may guide the steps and warm the hearts of all who read this Preface! A. SEDGWICK, Tue Precincts, Norwicu. September 17th, 1872. The first portion of this Preface amounting to about 12 pages was dictated at Cambridge to my young assistant Walter Keeping. The remaining part, excepting the Conclusion, was written at Norwich by my servant from my dictation. The Conclusion I dictated to my Niece. Without such kind help I could have done nothing. The University will, I hope, pardon the long delay (very painful it has been to myself) in the publication of the following Catalogue. The Comparative Schemes of Classification so kindly and clearly given by Professor Morris, and alluded to above (page xv, 1, 2), ought to have been printed in extenso from the first; but they will appear among the papers so generously added by him to this Volume. A TABLE SHOWING THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE LOWER PALHZOZOIC ROCKS. CLASSIFICATION OF THE SEDGWICK. MURCHISON, 1868. JUKKS, 1863. Ledbury Shales. Passage Beds. r Downton Sandstone, Bone Bed, and f Tilestones, and | Upper Ludlow. Upper Ludlow. : Zz x Aymestry Limestone, and S Aymestry Limestone. S = TS Sp Ff Tel = 4 Lower Ludlow. tae 3 4 Lower .Ludlow. B 4 NM p} oD Wenlock Group. # | Wenlock Limestone and Shale. a a > Lower Wenlock Group. 5 | Woolhope Limestone and Shale. P i May Hill Group. L Upper Llandovery. Zz = [ : Upper Bala Group. 5 Lower Llandovery. ¥ | = { Middle Bala Group. “ 4 Caradoc and Bala Rocks. 2 i=) ace Lower Bala Group. = | Upper and Lower Llandeilo Rocks. ag Arenig or Skiddaw Group. aa 8 g Zz = S 4 ( Tremadoc Group. < Eye! a =| Ffestiniog Group. Lingula Flags, or =e Menevian Group. PRIMORDIAL SILURIAN. Harlech Group. 1 : z a ¢ Longmynd, Bangor, and | CAMBRIAN, = = gmyr 5 > a) L 4 | Lianberis Group. | a ‘f 'S) In a Table of Strata prepared by Mr H. W, Bristow (1872), R. I. Murchison as forming an intermediate or Middle Silurian, Tremadoc, Lingula and Meneyian beds forming the Lower Silurian. The Graptolite shales being equal to the Arenig or Stiper- stones. In the Lake district the Kirby Moor flags are equivalent to the Tilestones and Upper Ludlow, and the Bannisdale beds represent the Aymestry limestone, Lower Ludlow, Wenlock and Woolhope series. The Coniston Grits and Flags are equal to the Denbighshire Flags and Grits. The Stockdale slates (Graptolite mudstones) being equal to the Tarannon shales. The Coniston lime- stone is equivalent to the Caradoc or Bala beds. The Green slates and Porphyry are equivalent to the Upper Llandeilo, and the Skiddaw slates to the Arenig beds or Lower Llandeilo. the Upper and Lower Llandovery beds, considered by Sir are kept distinct. The Lower Llandovery, Caradoc, Llandeilo, ) LOWER PALAOZOIC ROCKS. LYELL, 1871. PHILLIPS, 1855. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, 1865. f Downton Sandstone and Bone Bed. Tilestones. Upper Ludlow. Upper Ludlow. . Lower Ludlow. e Aymestry Limestone. z Z 5 = | S 4 Lower Ludlow Beds. 5 5 Wenlock Limestone and Shale. B 3 | Wenlock Limestone. z a a Woolhope Limestone and Grit. | a 3 Wenlock Shale with Sandstone. > 4 ~ | Tarannon Shales. | =) & Woolhope Limestone and Shale. Upper Llandovery, or May Hill. | Denbighshire Grits. Lower Llandovery. z Tarannon, or Pale Shales. : SO e a { Bala and Caradoc Beds. E 2 [ Upper Llandovery Rock, or May Hill Sandstone. = Soe 5 8 + Llandeilo Flags, le He f Lower Llandovery Rock, &e. Arenig, or Stiper-Stones Group. = | E aa | Caradoc or Bala Sandstone, and Limestone. = Tremadoc Slat a zi a g RETOOL, PENSE Ss Es | Llandeilo Flags and Limestones. Ee ’ 3 Bi Bed mae Lingula Flags. 5 — 3 3 | Graptolite Shales and Slates. ae : ; 7) e c Menevian Beds. | , z | Tremadoc Slates. Be 4 rise as ; 8 E | Ease mae | E 3 | Lingula Beds, ( Harlech Grits and Llanberis Slates. 3 4 Harlech, Llanberis, St David’s, and Longmynd = Grits, and Conglomerates with Pale and 3 Green Slates. In 2 communication to the Geologists’ Association (June 1872), on the Classification of the Cambrian and Silurian rocks, Dr Hicks nearly followed that adopted by Sir C. Lyell. The Lower Cambrian, to include the Longmynd (Harlech grits and Llanberis slates and the rocks at Bray Head) and the Menevian groups. The Upper Cambrian, to include the Lingula flags (Lower, Middle and Upper, called also the Maentwrog, Ffestiniog and Dolgelly) and the Tremadoc groups. The Lower Silurian, to comprise the Lower and Upper Tremadoc and the true Arenig rocks, the Upper and Lower Llandeilo and the Bal The Upper Silurian, to consist of the Lower and. Upper Llandovery, the Wenlock and Ludlow groups. Arenig, the former being a connecting link between the a or Caradoe groups. SUMMARY OF THE CONTENTS OF THE CATALOGUE, BY PROFESSOR MORRIS. Cambrian. The Lower Cambrian, including the Longmynd and Harlech groups (Sedgwick), is repre- sented by but few forms in the collection. These are the Oldhamia, only hitherto found in Ireland, some Annelida from the Longmynd, a few Brachiopoda (Lingulella, Obolella), and a few Trilobites, which occur low down in the Longmynd group at St David’s Promontory, South Wales, as Conocoryphe, Paradoxides, Microdiscus, and the interesting genus Plutonia, haying affinities with Paradoxides and Anopolenus, which appears to be restricted to this zone, and, next to Paradoxides Davidis is the largest Trilobite found in the British Cam- brian rocks. The Middle Cambrian comprises the Menevian, Ffestiniog, and Tremadoc groups, The fauna of the Menevian, or Lower Lingula flags, is represented by Trilobites of the genera Conocoryphe, Agnostus, Olenus, Paradoxides, Microdiscus, Erinnys, Anopolenus, Holocephalina, the last three genera being at present characteristic of this zone; Paradoxides and Micro- discus here become extinct, while the first three genera range into the zones above: with these are found a few Phyllopoda (Primitia, Hymenocaris), some Brachiopoda and Pteropoda, (Theca, Stenotheca, Cyrtotheca). The Pteropoda appear to be tolerably abundant in these primordial rocks, in which occur also a Cystidean (Protocystites), and some sponges. The Ffestiniog group, or Middle and Upper Lingula flags, is chiefly represented by some Annelids and Trilobites. The genus Olenus here attains its maximum numerical develop- ment, and a species of the allied genus Dikellocephalus also occurs, together with a few Brachiopoda belonging to the genera Lingulella, Obolella and Orthis. The fossil forms of the Lower and Upper Tremadoc groups chiefly comprise Phyllopoda and 'Trilobites: among the latter are the genera, now first noticed, Niobe (intermediate to the genera Asaphus and Ogygia), Psilocephalus, a very abundant form, allied to Ilenus, Angelina (allied to Olenus), the most abundant of the Tremadoe Trilobites, and species of Asaphus, Ogygia, and Cheirurus. There are also some Pteropoda and Heteropoda, as Theca, SUMMARY OF THE CONTENTS OF THE CATALOGUE. XXX1X Conularia, and Bellerophon, and a species of Orthoceras, which at present is the oldest known form of the Cephalopodous group of Mollusca. The Arenig or Skiddaw group, which is classed as the upper part of the Middle Cambrian, or as forming the base of the Upper Cambrian, contains many species of Grap- tolitide, belonging to the genera Graptolites, Diplograpsus, Phyllograptus, Didymograpsus, Dichograpsus, Tetragrapsus, and Dendrograpsus, a few worms, some genera of Trilobites of which, species of Calymene, Aiglina, and Ogygia, are the most abundant, together with a few Brachiopoda, Lamellibranchiata and Pteropoda. The Upper Cambrian comprising the Lower, Middle and Upper Bala groups, is represented in the collection by a numerous fauna. There are many species of Graptolites, Corals (both Tabulate and Rugose), Brachiopoda, and Trilobites, which latter here attain their maximum developement; together with a less number of species of Lamellibranchiata, Gasteropoda, Pteropoda and Cephalopoda, and some Crinoids and Starfishes (Protaster, Paleaster). Silurian. The May Hill Sandstone or upper Llandovery is represented by some species of Corals belonging to the genera Favosites, Heliolites, and Petraia; a few Annelids and Trilobites: the Brachiopoda, however, are the most abundant, whilst the species of Gasteropoda, Lamel- libranchiata and Cephalopoda are but few in number. The Lower Wenlock group. In this, as in the preceding group, the Graptolites have diminished in number, and the Corals, Echinoderms and Trilobites have but few repre- sentatives; but, as in the preceding period, the Brachiopoda are most abundant, the Cephalo- poda also comprising a large number of species. The Wenlock group contains a rich fauna: the Bryozoa and iljnseiets| aoe 95ch || eee * * * eK OK KR OH OK 7k KOK OR OM eK Oe Oe * * * * * * KK KK KK KK K HK Echinodermata Protocystites ... n0¢ oa0 |||. coos || Ne Echinospheerites 500 Sonn || coos monoulliieee Seca lines | ioe ier Sphezeronites ... a 508, || 06 |Io00 lheado |)4on NY oa0 i ‘aan. If Apiocystites ... 506 500 || cou | eas |} cos |] ese |) com |} 060. || de |} eon noe | Prunocystites ... os Pera Beant eee (ctu erseulieteenl esa | cae dul eae Sao. fia | Pseudocrinites... ae Sade }| ccd lace frodse cata acral ieser, =mCBon lator Echino-encrinites 505 See. || “oactl|@aa 361 Goo. eer |lsony Il) canal lence | son doo |Irobo Ateleocystites ... nae eee prec eellissiees ||fiesell| sie Wu stesmliWesd. || seer dleeoe 060 || cos Pisocrinus sue Ra ade) || aoa iitdos Hance. las ||lSe0: Ifeoo IBoons || ese Boge | eee Glyptocrinus .,. Bee néq |i doasfeads. foam Wades || adn. l|iooell|| Isee-l|| cod ce se | Periechocrinus... oe SSoel dec. | lee om ieceee | ogre he cetsulicoeal (accel (ere a leeo | Actinocrinus ... ae S00 || 686° |] dosel|soon eSag {fone all ado u|feaas iloee 300 |] gs |} oa0 fle Hypanthocrinus aes Meinl Cae lf! don. ineu tfeseeal| yoons||Vaco<\iecaascoo. . |[) sdoom |e Herpetocrinus ... Sin Abe, A} too5{ oon), feral fureest||) corel|lecee al lueron | cao oéanil oe Cheirocrinus ... 000 BAAR] Scere aco: adem Pesee el ineecdllt Socal ase: IN" ond os Marsupiocrinus 508 BP en i sora obG |\ odcn] aaa Receeen aces 1 lected liecaa Soult eee Dimerocrinus ... 500 Sorell coral acs ||: Adeull seed ecco ccs -|leaae albease ies, Il rate Mariacrinus... aon Seon ||| oneal haae i) dot iMoes Non) daa || soa \h.o6r ae | Platyecrinus ... S06 ana Meats: || Pech] satstae |resepall| Meeectl | siete [tee ell eee sods |e | Crotalocrinus ... ies Feel feces ariel moos aliecces leone: \ltinod Jl Peccenal ace she | Cyathocrinus ... ane Aen cee leccralleene: ecreu|lpoce. Ices | ane: meas sade'| | ak Taxocrinus.... an Fae Aogaiwook |laceeelso6. Paco ‘||/o0a |lleadar heeded Nee ||| eee Ichthyocrinus ... a Jeeel| keodgel| a6 || \esoe|soeo |h. cea"), o6e~jfecanal ease woe | eee * * * Ke KX KH HK * * * * Ke eK KX K KK OK OK * * Protaster oat Palwaster aes Lepidaster aia Palasterina ... Paleocoma ... Bdellacoma ... Annelida Arenicolites ... Scolecites ae Scolecoderma ... Cruziana Bee Pyritonema ... Nemertites ... Myrianites ... Nereites ae Palzochorda ... Tentaculites ... Trachyderma ... Serpulites ... Crossopodia... Cornulites one Spirorbis sae Turrilepas aac Crustacea Conocoryphe ... Plutonia cen Paradoxides ... Microdiscus ... Agnostus a0 Holocephalina... Erinnys eee Anopolenus... Arionellus ... Olenus 56 Dikellocephalus Psilocephalus ... Asaphus REO Ogygia Soe Angelina ace Cheirurus Sc Trmucleus ... Phacops ee Calymene set Dionide sed Trinucleus”... Ampyx ox Homalonotus ... Echinodermata (continued) TABLE OF GENERA. * * * * * * * * * * * * * CAMBRIAN. eee oe hal Sok a4 seta talSlels (a ro) ny Be) ca} 3 =| 3 Ee FI 2 g a E Es =) ° a ce) a o 2 ia) 4 = Fy A 4 4 P= Pp . eee eee wee eee eee * e oe eee eee eee of wee oK wee * * se * eee . * eee * eee . . . eee eee . * one eee eee eee * oe oe eee eee . wee * . SinvuRIAN. . T y ai = “J a ' a i] uc) =] = S Ls] 2 Be |S |) a(n aera ate S78.) S41 Sen sane w rE | et a ea eo) ves Bes | 3 | Pee ieee: |) ce > E 3 Ee a aa cs) ° ° ia] io) oO rst ih sr |] ES NS iS | = Pr ‘ . eee * | 3 “ : * , | | | ee oa * | | | * ere * . * arefebe | lieeteiore (liars % * * * ! | | | | | | | nee * xliv TABLE OF GENERA, CaMBRIAN. SILURIAN. Lower Cambrian. stone. Menevian. Ffestiniog. Tremadoe. Arenig Group. Lower Bala. Middle Bala, Upper Bala. May Hill Group. Lower Wenlock. Wenlock Group. Lower Ludlow. Upper Ludlow. Downton Sand- Ledbury Shales. Crustacea (continued) AMglina a sc aeealllRee Neciesal|Nbsice> Nl taee | ye Barrandia sco aie Pasill. cies iectonlll ucacea aaeeaa tee Lichas tes o6t ea alters eerrsaitees (ames utes Illeenus ron nak Peat) ceca Weicon he-coee acetan aeiea Acidaspis S06 aoc SR nae Waa leee = IP Seer IMG Sule « Staurocephalus 50 Bee eee iertece | eect liceoe (cece ee Spherexochus... bao pee elBeacicc'|; sees sestadlt eaeeal eee al|) eae Cybele se obi eee lPeree | ooh | see see lMarceolll eas Enecrinurus.... dae Seta | cress |-Ge at |) retell reel hese festa Harpes 306 “coc aril) ccc eel Seen eral eae |e Proetus ei hes Seu MliBecall eam: Ili-vewe. Wlteemee Peace gece mete |aers = || coc |} ey |e Cyphaspis Ee Sl me eM ee 1s ee eae eae hl Ue i eer Be cet ae Primitia ane ae Bost || eon Niners lence hese [ues ls ¢ Hymenocaris ... eas Soc; || conn ery alee Ceratiocaris... 000 560. |} 060 |} G00 |] c00 |) Ih 600 ||P coo ||) re Hieeae soo || coo: | esl) hq he Lingulocaris ... Sac Sag ||; oben leant saneis (foxes Cythere sil Aap nape |P aepe meet lees fmemenel ecnecn ee Beyrichia wi 406 aoa. |) seo |foo8 || oc0 [f Soe: |] cco ee es Bo) Dag || esl eaeeal WR li oe Caryocaris ... oon Faces eg ace -|lnoaoesl eeu tak Peltocaris ae sols Serre | Ree lalla cal Mra | ears Act ees eens rath tel aden Alls scicic Beall age Dictyocaris aK, aise aa eee eee eee doo eee eee aiele eee sists eee aos eee * Leperditia —... aa Jeey|| cae. |fiscabal lecbenallasecun cece <|ieeed. | lereeal lean Spill ecb (aneen eral, ke eso' || ey Pterygotus ... Wis fe Eee acapalinc sar l| Mat ly eae ullcceee led lonek Saat, seclhig Slimonia oat Se oe ees) gcethellecisctel|l saat cactulea est ll esccel| sak Seon tgeiet | eee ee Hemiaspis ... abe Sob. |t Boeunleeeo. Nene Merew [aoe leseee |eesae! Wiser dacl| een ll eaee lll ate Kurypterus bs te ea ang. ||, coo" aaa. loce: |] Boo |) ae ll" cao Neaa || noe Aon |) 600. | Goa: I) os0 * * * * a * * * * * * * * * * KK OK * * * * * Bryozoa Glauconome ... Gab s00 || 540 || cop |} 000 |] o¢6 II dee | -c06 |} teas |} 8 Ptilodictya ... Ace 500. |} 260:|| G05: |] coe || cco {| cao ll 08. Il Boo. |! Trematopora ... ob S66) ||fr are |faaen al Pesca | cra Alf Gee lhecren || Receaa| cne 300 || 000 Discopora cnt 500 ao |} 268 Il noo ‘Ione {I oc6 |) cao:|! oc. aoc: || occ aod |) 066 Ceriopora aes 500 086 |) a6o:(N aco. } a00°|| goa! |] adel] ceo | Goo |} coe doo || cae Fenestella ... sac doom cote [litaanr|-coa:4 Mee 1) ska. |lvocor lleeeaelll lane Bath | lone Dictyonema ... bie bd edog: Il Gort 4! ae leaden Wecas |lcoce: [keene lecac 960 || oa0 Polypora 506 S55 coo |} éco. || coo | 605 || coo |} aco IIa6a || cas |! onc 900 ||| 606 Brachiopoda Lingulella ... 20 Obolella wee Discina pes Orthis ee Kutorgina Lingula re a Bann tt cogulleeses {f coat lace Crania ae de mists; || vajore’ ll steel eetoam | teers i Siphonotreta ... Strophomena. ... Lepteena a Trematis x * * Ke Ke K * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * # * * * * * KK * * TABLE OF GENERA. xlv CAMBRIAN. SILURIAN. ill Group. | Lower Bala. | Middle Bala, Upper Bala Lower Wenlock. Wenlock Group. Lower Ludlow, Upper aa Downton Sand- stone Ledbury Shales. Menevian. Tremadoce, | Lower Cambrian. May H | Ffestiniog. | Arenig Group. Brachiopoda (continued) Atrypa Se ae 05 |! 300, jf aoahl) 6c: |I/'00| |I\2sc0: |fsace Triplesia aes 6 Sac || c00 I) S504) adao! |f voas. |] Spo | loot Rhynchonella ... a Pentamerus ... nee Seoailieteese |) wash |) cap. [etomidate ll overs Porambonites ... oe Bele ie ager laacicioed hartayoal Morse dl hatescall uae Meristella wa ae Pe cre | reuiche | ec atl linteneaeellemetcrchll| cateeoe ll Saieteg ||) eae * Obolus sine ee Be || teiaret, | eka | eters lh creepy liberi atwod It weed lL eres x foo * * * He * * * * KK KX * * * * * * * Spirifer ane 500 pos) Soe Nene) ae olf eed “| ade fllStowe: ol [dea p|| “oc * Chonetes ax ie eel SER Uses fe hae RS Bala al cep hae (eee, Bl baa * Athyris See Rae SH cee RBS al soll acer limoce dllikeee ol ieee oaG vee | ok Retzia wae cee Boe Aceal| Mecca Pecerallt- ceed liecog illeeoe flesooell aces coe |g Eichwaldia ... Mt moe I Nseceewll Perel cater ie mered ecsected ll mike Teretecoih lh caves coe | cee Nucleospira... 50% 066. Ihde 4h aoe! || dee |) cae ||) coo || ce ||)!onm ||!ea0 see | ones Lamellibranchiata Paleearca oe 00 soca 'l| Reco elece |siace eck ll gob loc Ctenodonta ... 906 Secale ers al lence | piers al ecg ee alleen Pterinea 500 20 Seen | debe ane, lester eben tlleeee tl ee Modiolopsis... ae cies le Saal ESR acai fecseee Il sed esac * x * Lyrodesma ... ach ating || 40h ooo Alieee Mhided MMe dpe Iles dl =noc * * * * * * Ke KK KK * * * * OK * Cleidophorus ... ste SEP fn Octet | ee eee Ol leeeeen lheeste, beer Orthonotus... a Pen see cart fl ema Tie tes 3 | eekene tbc Cuculella oe Bs aisle || Messak| eettene| bac t alle patecoadl scrote le ares Mytilus sae a0 Bem liccsesl| oa las ||ecoel| ReceuillMases | hesese lltede Fi || 9 || oao || coo. |! Nuculites ts nee Reel loses Al Gace /Paeal Weise ntocell oe |lecken| laciad Son || Cardiola aa bho Sel | ate | eee gael ecreee | seeseied ees sreadl Betcre Ml fulsiers cael cae Ambonychia ... 556 aerallacde || coor ||)oe0 {kabel |) coc |edosel| aa. fee see | woe Pseudaxinus ... nae Ber (eee llncisse || “ss SeRel lace lide ee Meson | eter leet p00 || ood Pleurorhynechus wee asia | ecenallatetetall cress Nrerrcis, eters, Ml since ll wae: J|iarere vee [aes Goniophora... aide SUG lone || “sont (voce |) cane Pecan ac. Wenac. (aon see | eee Grammysia_... Pp RPE Wit dep |cioa al oder | ocaw||eaarenl besen |) seca |eeior 5a || ove Lunulacardium ae SE aecaic pees eae esc | aeeayeed llitevresh ll Pecaree alison pas" || aoc Anodontopsis ... Fae Aran eestor cael -aereen| Ik Bete | Reem (ee eres leocic Con lesoe Ml eacralliers |e Gasteropoda | Murchisonia ... ane sEfeh ll antes a) [aeeeerll eet lll Reel ealiwerare * | Pleurotomaria hy Feed) Loctad ecoallcanyleacrae lee Raphistoma ... ner aq, coo dase || ceo |) oon EKuomphalus ... a ae Aas cl cal [occ oll Varta Cyclonema ... noe 360. {ane Wheass. |-ooa || 686 || seas} aoe Holopea aes aes ON lececenl Reread ecrroce sect a Aral es * * Holopella ser Bee Sool excel larson ltreiee, |lexceme hectscie|fae al * 1x > ok * x * OK * * * * * * * Ke K OK * * * * * * * * *% * * * Loxonema oe sae np | cao eal arc enero Wieser Trochus Se aac Ade. || cece ected Reread (ert Acroculia 506 P53 aco.|| opel (aoceu | MBSemn| imeben beaten! (nnowl| Pesce ecto Py Ni ode | PS] €% | Trochonema ... Aas ane | Macrocheilus ... wae ides ||| “eco s| hacoe| Matokl Ieee Naticopsis eae ame p00 || ood.|| coe 1) aoe. || Gonelll eon Platyschisma ... dis Aoo._||: Scion || sass) | ceteaa lee ieee leccaal Leora! laser bee | eae) s eer mem ace | xlvi TABLE OF GENERA. CAMBRIAN. SILURIAN. 4 a r e 5 a i=) 5 . : wm z ! a jes ee |e £ ees a . bel — Pa 3s q : cH = 3 ro) A 3 a am laal a 3 ad | pies s a || = gS 5 5 ei ce So) SN Sal & ay | EM |) ee) aie | & | ea] & veel = | w & 4 3 m 2 Mu isa} H to) H mw 3 3 | i) a) se) g e) i=} 5) 3 = re) 3) a 2 See Wee Wee aleee a ies ae | Sahel |= P= a =f = =) =| | et | sels} HE | Sy iS We 4 Heteropoda Bellerophon ... sae 500 Maclurea Jas Bas oe Pteropoda Theca aa wee me Stenotheca ... = ae | Cyrtotheca... 500 ses Conularia nae ane ES. Eccyliomphalus 500 608 Graptotheca ... Ss ae Cephalopoda Orthoceras... 28s ae Cyrtoceras a Es Mae Ormoceras ee Ane oe Lituites See see ade Phragmoceras - s0C | Trochoceras ... nae Ac Tretoceras ace ane is Pisces Onchus ake 00 Ses Pteraspis Ae ah ac Page (exivit ~) AD DEN Ds: 3. Protospongia diffusa, Rep. Brit. Assoc, 1865, p. 285. Protocystites, Rep. Brit. Assoc., 1865, p. 285. Agnostus Dayvidis, ib. p. 285. Agnostus scutalis, ib. p. 285. Anopolenus Henrici and Salteri, p. 481° not 478. . Olenus cataractes, Dec. x1, Pl. 8, fig. 14 10. Hymenocaris vermicauda, Pl. 1, Pl. 2, figs. 1—4. 10. Agnostus princeps, line 3 from bottom (dele 6) add Pl. 4 f. 2, 11. 23. Asaphus Solvensis and A. Menapiz belong to Niobe, according to Dr Hicks. NOp eS 128. Ateleocystites Fletcheri. In the Geological Magazine, 1871, Vol. VIII, p. 71, Mr Woodward calls attention to the genus Ateleocystites of Billings figured and described by him in Decade tt. of the publications of the Geological Survey of Canada, Montreal 1858. In a letter which accompanies this notice, Mr Billings considers Tremadoc. Carnarvon Road. Barmouth Road. Traeth bach. Porrmapoc Estuary: shewing the relations of the Menevian (c), Ffestiniog (d), Tremadoc (e), and Arenig Groups (f) in the district around Portmadoc, N. Wales. By the Rev. A. Sedgwick, LL.D. 1847, and J. W. Salter, 1853—7. The faults are all by J. W. 8. The strata, in descending order, are :— f. Arenig (or Skiddaw) Group. Dark earthy slates on a base of sandstone (=Stiper Stones, Shropshire). e. Tremadoe Group. Dark slates, iron stained, and with felspathic beds—1500 feet thick. d. Ffestiniog Group. Thick flaky sandstones, 2000 feet, and a bed of black slate 300 feet. c. Menevian Group. Dark slate and sandstone—only the top beds (with Olenus cataractes). oe Middle _. { Sandstones, hard, laminated, flinty, 2000 feet thick. d. Ffestiniog Group Lingula flag. ; es Upper ( Black Slates, often stained with iron, 200 to 1000 fect. Case and Ref to McCoy’ Column of SHEERS tho) Miho Grnes Names and References; Observations, &e. Numbers and Localities. Drawers. | Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. AMORPHOZOA. None yet known. Graptolites. POLYZOA or HYDROZOA? (Graptolitide). Horny sheaths, with a slen- Considered by Prof. McCoy and some other der solid axis, and with nume- authors as Sertularian Zoophytes. I there- _rous close-set cells opening fore place them here in the order given to | into the common sheath. The them in the Synopsis. (See for their affini- ties, Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 111. p. 328, and Carruthers, Geol. Mag. Vol. v. pl. v.) _mouths often armed with spines. Gh Dictyonema (Graptopora) sociale, Salter (Mem. | a, 12, black slates of Tre- elie Geol. Surv. Vol. 11. pl. 4, fig. 1). Vari- | madocand Wern, and other ously known as Gorgonia, Dictyonema, and | places, Cefn Cyfarnedd &c. Graptopora. A net-like fossil, allied to the | on the Carnarvon Road. Fenestella and Polypora of the Bala and | (Presented by Mr. Ash, Wenlock rocks: but of horny texture and | 1862.) a. 13, oliveshales with cells in double row, like Graptolites. | of White-leaved oak, Mal- (Salter, Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. mi. p. 331.) | vern. (Rev. W. Symonds.) 9 -_ MIDDLE CAMBRIAN. Names and References; Observations, &e. Numbers and Localities. 10 Gace and Reference to McCoy’s olumn of = 2 Drawers.| Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Worm-tubes and burrows. Gh Phyllopod Crustacea, allied to Apus and Nebalia. G case and Gh Trilobites. Gh Gh ANNELIDA (The burrows are frequently called Fucoids, see note in Wenlock Group). | Scolecites (Irregular worm-burrows in the sandy silt, crossing each other at various angles. Such burrows, filled with the excreta of the (Salter, | worm, are common in all rocks. Quart. Geol. Journ. Vol. Iv. p. 223). Scolecoderma antiquissimum, Salter (Zrachy- derma in various works) is a common large worm-tube in the Hollybush sandstone, | which sandstone I have referred to the middle Lingula. flags. Scolecoderma is the tube itself, often membranous, of the worm. Cruziana semiplicata, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. ui. pl. 3). A curiously plaited tube, fur- rowed along the middle. The genus was very abundantly spread over the world in Cambrian times. It is rather an anomalous form. But the ridgy plaiting of the upper surface probably has reference to the double rows of lamelle covering the back of the short broad worm. CRUSTACEA. Phyllopoda. Hymenocaris vermicauda, Salter (Mem. Geol. Sury. Vol. 1. 1866, pl. 1, fig. 2, p. 293). A shrimp-like form, evidently allied to the living Nebalia and the Silurian Ceratiocaris. The carapace is ample and undivided. Body with 7 or 8? joints. Tail with 6 appendages. CRUSTACEA Trilobita. Agnostus trisectus, Salter, Decade 11, M.G.S. pl. 1, fig. 11. The centre tail-lobe is triple. Agnostus princeps, Salter (Decade 11, 1. ¢. figs. 1—5) ; also Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. m1. pl. 5, fig. 1a). (A. princeps, var. Salter, Mem. Geol. Surv. lc. pl. 5, fig. 16). A common Lingula flag species, with radiating strize to the limb of the head. [These must be obtained for the collection. ] [Near Bangor: Ffestiniog, Dolgelly, &c. common.] Hollybush sandstone, Mal- vern. (Presented by Dr. Grindrod.) [Common near Bangor. | a. 15, Borth harbour, Portmadoe. (Presented by Mr. Salter.) Top beds of the middle Lingula flag. a. 16 (Pres. by Mr. F. Ash). b.16 (Mr. D. Homfray). a. 22, Whiteleaved oak, Malvern. Black Shales. Carreg wen, Portmadoc. (Mr. Ash and Mr. Homfray.) a. 267, a. 268, Moel Gron, Upper Mawddach. (Mr. Plant, 1869.) Case and Column of Drawers. FFESTINIOG GROUP. 11 Gh Gh Gh Gh Gh Gh Gh Gh Reference to McCoy's Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. —— — Names and References; Observations, &c. Localities and Numbers. Typical Olenus. Spherophthalmus. Agnostus, sp. with narrow glabella. Agnostus, sp. undetermined. Olenus micrurus, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. Tit. 1866, pl. 2, figs. 5, 6. p. 800). Distinct by the body being attenuated behind, and by the small entire tail of two segments. Olenus Plantii, Salter, n. sp. An oval species much flattened and expanded. Mr. J. Plant, who discovered it, has distributed casts and photographs of this fine and well marked fossil. Olenus (Parabolina) spinulosus, Wahl. (Ange- lin. Pal. Suec. t. xxv. fig. 9). Only lately noticed in Britain. It is common, and known by the fringe of long spines, directed backwards, to all the body segments. O. ser- ratus, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. m1. pl. 5, figs. 6, 7) is the same species. (O. comatus, Plant MSS.) e is a natural subgenus, the opposite of Spher- ophthalmus, in having the axis very broad, the cheeks small, and the head spines re- duced to zero. Decade 11, Geol. Surv. pl. 8. Olenus (Spherophthalmus, Ang.) flagellifer, Angelin (Salter in Decade 11, Geol. Surv. pl. 8, figs. 7, 8) O. flagellifer and O. alatus, pecten, hwmalis, bisulcatus, are members of the subgenus Spherophthalmus, in which the head is wide and short, and the globular eyes remote. Spherophthalmus is probably a very distinct genus. Olenus, small sp. like O. cataractes. See page 6. Olenus (Peltura) scarabeoides, Wahl. Peltura | Plant.) Carreg wen. (Mr. Homfray.) a. 269, do. (Mr. Plant.) a. 2638, Penmaen Pool, Mawddach valley, near Dol- gelly, middle Ling. flag. (Mr. Plant.) Casts from Craig-y-Dinas ; and a. 272, Moel Gron, Up- per Mawddach. (In Upper Ling. flag. Mr. Plant, 1869.) a, 276. Penmaen Pool, Mawddach R. (In Upper L. flag.) Mr. Plant. a. 261, Penmaen Pool, near Dolgelly (Mr. Plant). a.260, 271, 277, Rhiw felyn, on the Upper Mawddach R. (Mr. Plant). b. 349, fine series, same locality. (Mr. D. Homfray.) b. 285, Rhiw felyn, Upper Mawddach. (Mr. D. Hom- fray.) a. 270, Moel Gron, Upper Mawddach. (Mr. Malvern Black Shales. (Rev. W. Symonds.) All in Upper Lingula flag. Carreg wen, Borth, Port- madoc, (Presented by Mr. Ash.) Black slates ot Up- per Lingula flag. b. 2838, same loc. Mr. D. Hom- fray (fig. in Decade 11). 12 MIDDLE CAMBRIAN. (Case and Reterenee co McCoy's Names and References; Observations, &c. Localities and Numbers. Drawers: Synopsis : and Figures of Genera. Gh Olenus (Spher.) sp. Carreg wen, Borth. (Mr. D. Homfray.) Gh | Olenus (Spher.) alatus, Boeck (ib. pl. 8, fig. 6). | Carreg wen, Borth. (Mr. Head spines remarkably curved in this | Ash.) Malvern, Mr. Sy- species. monds. Gh The typical number of body | Qlenus (Spher.) expansus, n.sp. A very nar- | a. 275, Moel Gron. (U. segments in the higher forms row axis and enormously wide flanks dis- | Ling. flag.) Mr. Plant. is 10—13, but these genera tinguish this. have usually more, and the Gh | primordial trilobites are ge- | Qlenus (Spher.) humilis, Phillips (ib. pl. 8, | a. 273, Moel Gron, Upper nerally of extravagant forms, figs. 9,10, 11). Only 7 body rings. The | Mawddach. (Mr. Plant.) or else of very simple struc- most minute species known. Extremely | a.23, Malvern Black Shales. ture. common at Malvern. (Mr. Symonds.) Gh | Olenus (Spher.) sp. Malvern. (Mr. Symonds.) Gh | Olenus (Spher.) bisulcatus, Phillips (ib. pl. 8, | Malvern. Rev. W. Sy- fig. 6). The body and tail of this species, are | monds. known, but are not in this collection. Gh | Olenus (Spher.) sp. like O. bisulcatus. b. 281, Rhiw felyn, Upper Mawddach. (Mr. D. Hom- O. Pecten. fray.) Gh Olenus (Spher.) pecten, Salter (ib. pl. 8, fig. 12). The most spinose and abnormal of all the | b. 308, Malvern. (Rev. W. British species. The cheeks are singularly | Symonds.) contracted : the tail 13-spined (Quart. Geol. Journ. XXI. p. 478). Gh Olenus (Spher.) sp. Carreg wen, Borth. (Mr. Homfray.) Gh | Conocoryphe? ecorne, Angelin? (Acerocare ec. | b. 259. Penmaen Pool, Pal. Suec. xxv. fig. 10). If this be Angelin’s | Dolgelly (Middle Lingula species, which seems likely, Acerocare is a | flags. Mr. Plant). needless name. Gh | Conocoryphe Williamsoni, n. sp. A tumid front, | b. 292, Rhiw felyn. Up- spinose cheeks, and pointed bent pleure, distinguish this. per Mawddach. (Mr. D. Homfray.) b. 258, Pen- maen Pool, Dolgelly. (Cast) Mr. Plant. FFESTINIOG GROUP. OS Case and , Column of Reference oe MoCor's Names and References; Observations, &c. Localities and Numbers. Drawers. | ‘Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Gh Conocoryphe (Conocephalus) invita, Salter (De- | Penmorfa church, Trema- Gh Gh Gh Gh G case and a _ Brachiopods, or Lamp-shells. As Lingula Davisii, Pl. 11, fig. 7; as LZ. ovata, Pl. 11, (Note. Not the original LZ. ovata— that name is retained for the And when distorted, as Tellinomya fig. 6, pp. 252, 254. Bala species, p. 254). lingula@comes, Pl. 1k, fig. 18. cade XI. pl. 7, fig. 6). This genus is one of those which unite the Oleni of the Middle Cambrian with the Calymenide of the Up- per Cambrian and Silurian beds. 14 body rings. Conocoryphe abdita, Salter, Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 11. pl. 5, figs. 13 and 15. Dikellocephalus celticus, (Salter, Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. m1. pl. 5, fig. 22). A genus re- lated to Olenus, and yet differing from it by the expanded form and large tail. Pro- bably this form and D. furca of the Trema- doce Group belong to the genus Centropleura of Angelin. Several British and Swedish species are known. Dikellocephalus, sp. MOLLUSCA BRACHIOPODA. Almost all the species known of this order in the primordial group are the horny species, such as Discina, Lingula, Lingulella, Obolella, &e. One or two species of Orthis are all the calcareous hinge-bearing forms known. Lingulella lepis, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. I. p. 334, fig. 11. Davids. Sil. Brach. pl. 3, figs. 53—59). Lingulella differs from the modern Lingula by having a groove for the passage of the pedicle, else it is quite like it. Lingulella Davisii, McCoy (Davids. Sil. Brach. t. 4, figs. 1—16). The common Brachiopod of the Lingula flag: of all shapes according to the pressure of the rock. Its true shape is satchel-shaped (McCoy). It occurs both in the sandy middle portion of the Lingula flag, and in similar strata in the Tremadoc rocks. It occurs of smaller size in more slaty deposits, but its place in these is usually taken by the Z. lepis. doc., Upper Lingula flags. b. 290, 291, Carreg wen, Borth. [Mr. D. Homfray. | b. 284, Ogof ddu, as below. (Mr. D. Homfray.) Craig Ogof ddu, near Criccieth ; in upper Lingula flag. (Mr. Ash.) b. 282, specimens figured in Mem. Geol. Soc. Same locality. [Mr. D. Homfray.] Carreg wen, Portmadoc. (Mr. Ash.) Ogof ddu, Criccieth. (Mr. Ash.) b. 312, Dolgelly. Borth, Portmadoc. (Mr. Ash and Mr Homfray.) a. 19, Said to be from E. of Nant-y-groes? a. 17, Pen- morfa, Portmadoe (as Tel- linomya). a. 20 (As ZL. ovata), Penmorfa. a. 264, Hafod Owen, Upper Mawddach R. (Mr. Plant.) 14 MIDDLE CAMBRIAN, Case and Column of Drawers. Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Names and References; Observations, &c. Localities and Numbers. Gh Gh Gh Gh case Lingulella ———, sp. Kutorgina cingulata, Billings (Davids. Sil. Brach. pl. 4, figs. 17—19). Obolella Phillipsi, Holl. (Quart. Geol. Journ. Vol. xxr. p. 10, fig. 10 a,b). A very unusual shape for the genus, one valve nearly flat, and with a straight hinge-line: the smaller valve convex. Obolella Salteri, Holl. (1. c. fig. 9). A small and rounded species, like those of Canada (Davids. Sil. Brach. t. 4, figs. 28, 29). Obolella , Sp. Orthis lenticularis, Dalman (Salter, Mem. Geol. Sury. Vol. m1. pl. 4, figs. 8—10). A small shell seldom half an inch wide, and rather wider than long. The valves are both gently convex. The number of principal ribs 10 or 12, interlined by smaller ones, and all crossed by interrupted and rather wavy ridges of growth, so that the surface is somewhat reticulated (Atrypa lenticula- ris, Dalman, Spirifer lentic. Von Buch. Mr. Davidson has very fully figured this com- mon Upper Lingula flag species in his Monograph of the Cambrian and Silurian Brachiopods. Palzont. Transactions, PI. XXXII. fig. 22, &.). Dolgelly. (Mr. D. Hom- fray.) b. 808, 310, Ogof ddu, Criccieth. (D. H.) a. 18, Grits on Hollybush Hill, Malvern. a. 21, Black Shale, Mal- vern. (Rev. W. Symonds.) b. 309, Dolgelly, Penmorfa church. Upper Lingula Beds. (D. H.) a 265, Craig-y-dinas, Upper Mawddach. a. 266, Rhiw felyn; do. (Mr. Plant.) A common shell in all our Upper Lingula flag locali- ties: in N. Wales, viz. Tre- madoe, Criccieth, Dolgelly gold mines, &e. Ogof ddu, Criccieth. (Mr. Homfray.) MIDDLE CAMBRIAN. e. ele e2. Upper. Tremadoc Group. TREMADOC GROUP. N. Wales. S. Wales. Lower. Chiefly Black Slate. (Sedgwick, 1847). Sandstones, grey and bluish: iron beds: ferruginous slate, &e. el. Lower TreMADOC SLATE (Salter, 1857). A natural continuation of the Upper Lingula Flags. Chiefly black slate, but very ochreous in part. The fauna is essentially Middle Cambrian, but shews a tendency to include some few Lower Bala types, such as Niobe, Psilocephalus, &e. those of the Arenig Group, and those of the Upper are distinct from those of the Lower Tremadoc. tinguish the upper, e 2, from the lower group, e 1. The species however are all distinct, even from We dis- Case and | Reference to McCoy’s Column of ae | Synopsis : and Figures of Genera. G Trilobites. Gi | id a ale va are Gi Names and References; Observations, &c. | Niobe Homfrayi, Salter (Pal. Soc. Trans. Vol. 1. pl. 20, fig. 3). A genus intermediate in some sort between Asaphus and Ogygia. The labrum is round-pointed as in Ogygia, and the glabella lobed as in that genus, but broad as in Asaphus. The pleure bent, the axis of the body broad, the tail ample. Psilocephalus innotatus, Salter (id. pl. 20, figs. 13, 14). A small Trilobite, allied to [dla@- nus, very abundant. Psilocephalus inflatus, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 111. p. 316, woodcut 8). Conocoryphe depressa, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. ur. pl. 6, figs. 1—3). The species of this genus which occur in rocks above the Lingula flag, differ in not having the gla- bella lobes pronounced. Conocoryphe verisimilis, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 111. pl. 6, fig. 13). Dikellocephalus (Centropleura) furca, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 11. pl. 6, fig. 4, and pl. 8, fig. 10). The two blunt prongs to the hinder part of the tail distinguish this from D. celticus. It has also fewer ribs. Localities and Numbers. Tyn-y-llan, Tyn-y-dre, and other places near Trema- doe and Portmadoc. (Mr, Ash.) b. 329, 330, 362, (Mr. D. Homfray’s fine spe- cimens figured in the Pal. Tr.) from Penmorfa church. Tyn-y-llan, Tyn-y-dre, anc other places near Borth, Portmadoc. (Mr. Ash.) b. 352, 353, figured speci- mens. (Mr. D. Homfray.) b. 357, Penmorfa. (Mr. Homfray). Figured sp. Do. (Mr. Homfray). b. 354, Penmorfa village. (Mr. Homfray.) Llanerch, Moel-y-gest. | Garth, Portmadoc. (Mr. D. Homfray.) 16 MIDDLE CAMBRIAN. Caseiand Reference to McCoy’s Column of' 3 3 j Names and References; Observations, &c. Localities and Numbers. Drawers. Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Pteropods. PTEROPODA (Sea-Butterflies). Gi Theca operculata, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. | Tyn-y-llan, &c.,near Borth, Vol. 11. pl. 10, figs. 22—24). Most of the | Portmadoc. (Mr. Ash.) species of fossil Theca are operculated. The | b. 335. (Pres. Mr. Hom- living Pteropods nearest them in shape are | fray.) not so, but several of the spiral kinds have an operculum. (ib. p. 351 and note). Gi Theca bijugosa, Salter (ib. pl. 10, figs. 19, 20). | Borthwood, Portmadoc. The species differ in proportionate length | (Mr. Ash.) b. 334, Tyn-y- and breadth, and in the longitudinal ridges; | dre, do. figured specimen. most are smooth. (Mx. Homfray.) | Theca arata, Salter (ib. pl. 10, figs. 15 and 21). | [Portmadoc.] | May easily be obtained. Brachiopods. BRACHIOPODA. Gi Lingulella lepis, Salter (Davids. Sil. Brach. in | Tremadoc. (Mr. Homfray.) Pal. Trans. t. 3, figs. 53—59). | Trilobites and Phyllopods. e2. Upper Tremadoc Slate (Salter, 1857). Gi CRUSTACEA (Phyllopods and Trilobites), Lingulocaris lingulecomes, Salter (Mem. Geol. | . 98 Garth, Portmadoc. Surv. Vol. m1. pl. 10, figs. 1. 2). A bivalve (Mr. Ash.) b. 327, figured crustacean, allied to the Ceratiocaris of the specimen. (Pres. Mr See Silurian rocks, and also to the living Lim- fray.) nadia. Gi Ceratiocaris? latus, Salter; front segments of | b. 299, Garth (figured spe- body very broad. Badly figured in p. 294, Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. m1. as Hymenocaris. For genus, see Ludlow Rocks. Ceratiocaris ? insperatus, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. mt. p. 295, fig. 6). It is quite probably the tail portion of the preceding. cimen, Mr. D. Homfray). b. 343, Above Penmorfa Railway cutting, figured specimen, (Mr. Homfray.) Case and Column of Drawers. TREMADOC GROUP. Reference to McCoyv’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. 17 Names and References; Observations, &c. case case Tsotelus. Pl. 1F, fig. 8, p. 169. Univalve Shells. Pteropods. TRILOBITA. Angelina Sedgwickii, Salter (Decade Geol. Surv. 11. pl. 7). The most abundant of the Tre- madoe trilobites: allied to Olenus, but with 15 body rings (Olenus has 14), and greatly larger than any known species of that genus. Even size is a character of some importance in classification. Occurs in all sorts of com- pressed shapes in the slate and sandstone. Dicellocephalus furca, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. m1. pl. 8, fig. 9, 10). Belongs to the section Centropleura (ib. p. 303). Asaphus (Isotelus?) affinis, McCoy. Perhaps distinct from the following species. The facial suture is marginal in front. Asaphus (Isot.?) Homfrayi, Salter (Mem. Geol. Sury. Vol. m1. p. 311, pl. 8, fig. 11—14). The earliest known form of this genus in Britain, if indeed the entire form of the labrum do not prove it a distinct genus nearer Ogygia. (See Lower Bala.) b, 344 is the labrum. The subgenus Jsotelus is uncertain here, for the labrum is not notched as in that form. Ogygia scutatrix, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 11. p. 312, pl. 8, f. 8, pl. 9, fig. 1). 8 or 9 inches in diameter, and nearly round. More like the French species from Brittany, O. Des- marestt. Cheirurus Frederici, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 111. p. 322, pl. 8, figs. 1—3). A species with a general resemblance to the C. (Ke- coptochile) Sedqwickii, McCoy (see Lower Bala), but with spines to the hinder rings of the body. PTEROPODA AND HETEROPODA. Theca simplex, Salter? (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. IIL. p. 352, pl. 118, fig. 22—26). This, if the same as the Arenig group species, is the only fossil common to both formations. In Canada there may be a transition from the Primordial Group to the Upper Cambrian, or at least to the Arenig Group: but not in Britain. Theca sulcata, n.s. Broad and short ; with lon- gitudinal folds. Numbers and Localities. a. 32, Garth and Penclo- gwyn, at Portmadoc ; Car- narvon. (Mr. Ash.) a, 24, Reduced in length by cleavage. b. 337—840, Various ages of this fine species. (Mr. Homfray.) a. 30 (Mr. Ash.) Moel-y- gest; in the bottom beds of the Upper Tremadoce. a. 30*, Garth. (Mr. Homfray.) a. 26, Tremadoc, over Iron Works (Sedgwick). N.W. of Portmadoe. a. 25, Garth and Penclo- gwyn, Portmadoc. (Mr. Ash.) b. 342, 344, 358, figured specimens in Sal- ter’s Mon. Brit. Tril. pl. 24. (Mr, Homfray.) Penclogwyn, Portmadoc. (Mr. Ash.) Garth, Portmadoc. (Mr. Ash.) b. 345, 346, 347. Mr. Homfray’s specimen is figured in Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 11. p. 323, fig. 10. Garth, Tremadoc. Ash.) (Mr. b. 322, Llanerch, W. of Portmadoc, base of Upper Tremadoc. (Mr. Homfray.) 3 18 MIDDLE CAMBRIAN. cae ae Reference to McCoy’s ¥ ola fc Synofels® and Figures offGenee Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities, G Theca (Centrotheca) cuspidata, Salter (Mem. | b. 336, Portmadoc, (Mr. case Geol. Sury. Vol. m1. pl. 10, fig. 25). A long Homfray.) horn projects on each side from the mouth. & Theca trilineata, MSS, A small species with | 47 ne ne longitudinal lines. Hoiniten y:) G Conularia Homfrayi, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. | Garth, Portmadoc, (Mr. Gi Vol. m1. pl. 10, figs. 11—13). A very large | Ash.) b. 323, 824, 325 species, so slightly calcareous as to appear | figured specimens in above mere membrane on the slate. The pucker- | work. (Mr. Homfray.) ing of the surface is probably due to unequal contraction. See Lower Ludlow Rocks. & Bellerophon arfonensis, Salter (1. c. p. 349, pl. | Garth, Portmadoc. b. 328, 10, figs. 6—8). Squamose lines of growth, | 341 (Mr. Homfray, figured remote and rather regular. specimens). Gi Bellerophon multistriatus, Salter (1. c. p.350, pl. | Garth, Portmadoc, (Mr. 10, figs. 9, 10). With close decussating strie. | Homfray.) CEPHALOPODA. G Orthoceras sericeum, Salter (1. c. Vol. 111. p.356, | Garth, Portmadoc. (Pre- ne pl. 10, figs. 4, 5). This, and the Cyrtoceras | sented by Mr. Salter.) Gi precox of the same work, are the oldest | b. 321, 322, figured speci- known forms of the Nautiloid, or shelly | mens in the work quoted. | Cephalopod group. Cephalopoda became | (Mr. Homfray.) abundant in the succeeding period—the Bala | group, even in its lower portion: and a few are known in the Arenig Group. b. 321 shews the septa. The great break, in organic life, between the ‘Tremadoc Slate’ and the ‘Arenig or Skiddaw Group,’ has disposed me, ever since I worked out their respective faune in the Tremadoe district in 1853, to regard the next overlying, or ‘Arenig Group,’ as the base of the great Upper Cambrian Group of Prof. Sedgwick. Sir R. I. Murchison, in endeavouring to bring it first within the Ffestiniog or Lingula Flag Group, and later, among the Llandeilo or Lower Bala Group, has involved greatly the fossil evidence. But the Arenig or Skiddaw Group (Lower Llandeilo of Murchison) is peculiar, with the facies of the Lower Bala or Llandeilo Group, yet with wholly distinct species. To keep this Catalogue in harmony with the Synopsis, published in 1851—3, it is placed here as Prof. Phillips also regards it, as the terminal member of the Middle Cambrian. The fossil evidence would permit us, with Lyell, to commence the Upper Cambrian (or Lower Silurian of Murchison) with this Group, which is well represented in the Stiper Stones district; though the fossils of that district were not described till 1859 by Murchison and myself, long after the Arenig Group, with its few fossils, found by Prof. Sedgwick in 1848, was established. The group was further illustrated by the fossils found in Skiddaw by Prof. Sedgwick, and described by McCoy, previous to 1851 (though the relative age of the rock was not then fully known). The right of nomenclature rests therefore with the Woodwardian Professor. As the majority of the fossils, in both these transitional groups (Tremadoc and Arenig), have been first described by me, I may say that the Tremadoc Group seems to be the natural termination of the Ffestiniog or Middle Cambrian series; and the Arenig Group the true base of the Upper Cambrian (or Lower-Silurian of Sir R. I. Murchison). It is here treated as an intermediate Group. (J. W. S.) ARENIG OR SKIDDAW GROUP. MippLe Camprian. f. ARENIG or SKIDDAW GROUP (Sedgwick). Base of Arenig and Arran Fowddy. The Stiper Stones Rocks, 19 4000—5000 feet thick. N.B. Some few of the Graptolites must be identified with those of true Lower Bala rocks, which overlie the Skiddaw Group proper in the Skiddaw district ; but all the rest are distinct. The graptolitic or upper portion of the Quebec Group of Canada is iden- tical with this: so are the graptolite gold-bearing shales of Victoria; and Prof. McCoy thinks several of the forms the same in each. I think the Victorian species are representatives only, but the genera are the same; while those of Canada are exactly ours in species and genera. The Angers slate is of this age. The whole group is unconformable upon the Tremadoc slate, and only one fossil is common to that formation. Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Cake and Reference to McCoy’s Drawers. Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Graptolites, Simple, double-celled, and twin-graptolites; dichotomous, and bushy forms. Gi G. sagittarius, p. 6. FL esses ED TEED Gi Synopsis, p. 7. Gi Synopsis, p. 8. Gi HYDROZOA or POLYZOA. Some natural- ists, as above said, have referred the Grap- tolites to Bryozoa or Polyzoa. More believe them Hydroid Zoophytes of the Sertula- rian type. Graptolithus Hisingeri, Carruthers (Geol. Mag. 1868, Vol. v.). G. sagittarius, Hisin- ger (Salter, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Vol. vu. pl. 21, fig. 8). The Skiddaw specimens are only doubtfully referred to this very common Lower Bala species. Diplograpsus mucronatus, Hall (Pal. N. York, Vol. 1. pl. 73, fig. 1). These spinose species of Graptolites are now undergoing much revision, and it is probable great changes will be made in their names. D. barbatulus, Salter, is one of them, found at Ty Obry. Diplograpsus pristis, His. (Leth. Suec. pl. 35, fig. 5). A most common species, with only slightly prominent square-ended cells. Phyllograptus angustifolius, Hall (Grapt. Quebec Group pl. xvi. figs. 17—21). A re- markable leaf-like form, four rows of cells being placed crosswise on the stem or axis, instead of two, as in Diplograpsus. (Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Vol. xrx. p. 137, fig. 7). P. typus, Hall (1. c. pl. 15), is a larger species, but very like this. a. 33, Haykin Gill. a. 35, Knockmurton in Skiddaw slate. a. 34, Scaw Gill. a. 36, Craig ddu Allt, over Tremadoc Iron Works. a. 37, Ty Obry, east side of Tremadoc Estuary. (A. Sedgwick.) Tyddyn Dicwm, Tremadoc Estuary. (A. Sedgwick, 1847.) a. 45, Skiddaw Slate. (From Bryce Wright.) MIDDLE CAMBRIAN. Names and References; Observations, &c. 20 Sr oaae Reference to McCoy's Drawers. | Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Gi Under Grapt. latus, p. 4. (Not the figure or description, which belongs to G. priodon, Pl. 18, fig. 7.) Gi Gi Cennnnannnnn eats) Gi Gi Gi Compound Graptolites, di- chotomously branched on one plane. Didymograpsus latus, Salter. The specimens to which I restrict the name are from Skiddaw slate localities, and are broken portions of a twin graptolite. The specific name may stand, as unoccupied. Didymograpsus, sp. very like D. latus, and possibly identical. Didymograpsus geminus, Hisinger (Leth. Suec. Supp. 2, pl. 38, fig. 3). It is a Stiper Stones species, also found at Whitesand Bay. Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 111. pl. 11 8, fig. 8. Didymograpsus V-fractus, Salter (Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. XIx. p. 187, fig. 13 e), A species closely related to D. Pantoni, McCoy, from Australia. Didymograpsus Hirundo, Salter (Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. x1x. p. 187, fig. 13f). D. constric- tus, Hall (Grapt. Quebec, pl. 1, fig. 23—27). Tetragrapsus bryonoides, Hall (Graptolithus, ib. pl. m1. 1v. vi). A Graptolite with 4 thick branches recurved. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. ib. fig. 8a. The genus is like Didymograp- sus, but twice branched. Tetragrapsus quadribrachiatus, sp. Hall (1. c. pl. 5). Zetr. crucialis, Salter (Quart. Journ. Geol. Soe. ib. fig. 8b). Quite a distinct spe- cies, with much longer and patent branches. Dichograpsus, Salter. A large branching Grap- tolite, first discovered in Canada by Sir W. E. Logan. Graptolites, excepting Dendrograpsus and Dictyonema. This is a more compound form of Graptolite than Tetragrapsus, the branches bifurecating again and again, but only in one plane. Moreover a horny disk connects the base of the branches in some specimens. It is the most compound of Numbers and Localities. Seaw Gill, Whiteless, a. 39, Knockmurton. Omit the Builth Bridge locality, which contains only the Graptolites prio- don, and is Wenlock shale. Upper Arenig, Whitesand Bay. (Dr. Hicks.) a. 38, Skiddaw Slate. (From Bryce Wright.) Skiddaw Slate. Skiddaw, Stiper Stones, Whitesand Bay, St. Da- vid’s. Skiddaw Slate. (From Bryce Wright.) a. 48, Skiddaw Slate. (From Bryce Wright.) Case and Column of Drawers. Gi Gi Reference to McCoy’s _ Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Worm-burrows. Pl. 1A, fig. 1—3. Phyllopods. -Dichograpsus octobrachiatus, ARENIG OR SKIDDAW GROUP. 21 Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Hall (Grapt. Quebec Group, pl. 7, 8). D. aranea, Salter. Dichograpsus, sp. A fine large branching spe- cies, with long nodes to the branches. Dichograpsus Sedgwickii, Salter (Geol. Mag. Vol. Iv. p. 74. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Vol. xix. p. 187, fig. 11.) Dendrograpsus furcatula, sp. Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. m1. p. 331, pl. 11 a, fig. 5). For genus see again Lower Ludlow Rock. The branches are tufted irregularly and branch repeatedly. Dendrograpsus arbuscula, Salter MSS. A small species. -ANNELIDA. Palzochorda, McCoy. Supposed by some to be marine plants; but evidently the filled- up burrows of marine worms. Helminthites and Scolites, Salter. The filled- up burrows and surface-trails of marine worms, without impressions of any lateral appendages. Scolecoderma (a worm-tube). See Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 111. p. 292. CRUSTACEA, PHYLLOPODA AND TRILOBITA. Caryocaris Wrightii, Salter (Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Vol. xx. p. 139, fig. 15). A small shrimp-like creature, an inch in length; the carapace 2-valved. Primitia? sp. A bivalve entomostracan. Middle Bala for genus.) (See Skiddaw. a. 46, Skiddaw Slate. (From Bryce Wright.) [Skiddaw Slate. The sp. is easily obtained, and is characteristic. | a. 44, Ty Obry, Portmadoc. a. 295, Whitesand Bay, St. David’s. (Dr. Hicks.) Blakefell, Cumberland. Scaw Gill, Cumberland, Blakefell. a. 47, Skiddaw Slate. It occurs at Causey Pike and Grassmoor, Cumberland. a. 48, Ty Obry, Portmadoc. (Mr. Ash.) 22 Case and Column of Drawers. Gi case Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Trilobites. se Synopsis, Pl. 1F, fig. 7, p. 167. MIDDLE CAMBRIAN. Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Agnostus Hirundo, Salter MSS. species, with lobed tail-axis. A large Agnostus Morei, Salter (Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Vol. xxi. p. 486, woodcut). Phacops Nicholsoni, id. ib. p. 486. Calymene vexata, Salter (with Asaphus Mena- pie). Undescribed yet. A small species. Calymene is very common in Arenig rocks. Calymene ultima, Salter (C. Ramseiw, Hicks). Undescribed. Calymene Tristani, Brongniart (Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Vol. xx. p. 286), &e. A common French species. Calymene parvifrons, Salter. One of the very earliest species known of this common Cam- brian genus. It has the smallest glabella known in the group. (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. mt. p. 325. Salter, Mon. Brit. Tril. 1865, pl. 9, figs. 25—28). Dionide atra, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 11. p. 321. pl. 114, fig. 9). Allied to Ampyz and Trinucleus, but with no perforated fringe. Trinucleus Gibbsii, Salter (Siluria, 2nd ed. p. 53, Foss. 53. fig. 7). The genus is distin- guished by its perforated fringe round the glabella and cheeks. Ampyx Salteri, Hicks MSS. Much like A. nudus, Murchison. Homalonotus, sp. (H. bisulcatus, Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. m1. p. 328. pl. 11 a, fig. 8). A genus more prevalent in the Upper Cam- brian. Like Calymene it has 13 body seg- ments, and a forked labrum. Homalonotus monstrator, Salter. Undescribed as yet. Homalonotus, like Calymene, ranges into Devonian rocks. a. 298, Upper Arenig rocks, Whitesand Bay, St. David's, (Dr. Hicks.) Ellergell, near Milburn. [Prof. Harkness’ cabinet.] Whiteside, near Braith- waite, Keswick. do. a. 469, Ramsey Isle, N. end. (Dr. Hicks.) do. do. Carn Goran, 8. Cornwall. a. 56, Tai-hirion, W. of Arenig. (Sedgwick and Salter, 1843.) b. 360, Ty Obry, Portma- doc. (Mr. Homfray.) a. 52, Whitesand Bay, St. David’s. (J. W. Salter.) a. 303, Upper Arenig, Whitesand Bay, St. Dayid’s. (Dr. Hicks.) a. 57, Ty Obry. (Mr. Ash.) b. 355, specimen figured in Mem. Geol. Sury. (Mr. Homfray.) a. 482, Ramsey Isle. N. end. Quite the base of the Group. (Dr. Hicks.) x Case and Column of Drawers. G case Gi Gi Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera, ARENIG OR SKIDDAW GROUP. Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. SS Asaphus. AXgiina caliginosa, ib. (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 111. p. 318, pl. 11, fig. 10). The genus is known by its large eyes covering the cheeks, AMglina Boia, Hicks. A small smooth species, the head and tail like Agnostus. Aigiina binodosa, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 111. p. 317, pl. 11 8, fig. 3. Decade x1. PL. 4, fig. 1—6). Two tubercles on the third body segment. ; AXglina grandis, id. (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 111. p. 317, pl. 12, fig. 11). Two inches long; with rounded tail and granulated surface to head, Ogygia Selwynii, id. (Mem. Geol. Sury. Vol. 11. p- 313, pl. 11 8, fig. 5), The most character- istic trilobite of the Arenig group; and the first one found by Prof. Sedgwick in 1843. Ogygia peltata, id. (Mon. Brit. Tril. 1865, pl. 25*, fig. 2). A large fine species, resem- bling much the great trilobites of this genus in the slates of Angers. (0. Desmaresti, &c.) Ogygia Ogygia bullina, id. (Mon. Brit. Tril. ib. fig. 1). The glabella is much swelled in front and narrowed behind. , Sp. long narrow axis to tail. Asaphus solvensis, Hicks MSS. A small spe- cies with smooth tail-piece. Asaphus Menapi, Hicks (undescribed). A large species, with smooth tail-piece, A saphus be- comes abundant in the Arenig group. Asaphus, sp. with ribbed tail. MOLLUSCA. Strophomena, sp. fine strix. Lingula petalon, Hicks MSS. Ty Obry, Portmadoc (abun- dant), Mr. Ash. b. 350, 351. (Mr, Homfray.) a. 297, Whitesand Bay, St. David’s. (Dr. Hicks.) W. of Stiper Stones, Shelve. (Mr. Lightbody.) a, 53, Whitesand Bay, St. David's. (Dr. Hicks.) a. 54, W. of the Stiper Stones. (Mr Lightbody.) a. 55, Tai-hirion, W. of Arenig. (A. Sedgwick and J. W. Salter.) a. 50, Whitesand Bay, St. David's. (Specimen figured in Mon. Brit. Tril.) a. 356, Whitesand Bay. (Mr. Homfray.) a. 49, Whitesand Bay. (Specimen figured in Mon, Brit. Tril.) a. 293, Tremenheere, near Solva; Lower Arenig rocks. a, 469, 470, Ramsey L, St. Dayid’s, N. End. Base of group. (Dr. Hicks.) Upper Arenig rocks, White- sand Bay. (Dr. Hicks.) Carn Goran, Cornwall. a, 294, Arenig rocks of | Whitesand Bay. 24 MIDDLE CAMBRIAN. Case and Column of Drawers. Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Names and References; Observations, &c. Gi Gi Gi case case Gi Brachiopod Shells. Lamellibranchs. Orthis Carausii, Salter (Davidson, Earliest Brach. Geol. Magazine, Vol. v. pl. 16, fig. 23). Short, squarish, with 16 simple ribs. Orthis , sp. (O. calligramma of some works, but a distinct species). Orthis Menapie, Hicks (Davidson, 1. c. pl. 16, figs. 2428). The fine ribs distinguish this from the species above described. Obolella? plumbea, Salter (Lingula, Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. mr. pl. 11 8, fig. 10: Davidson, Sil. Brach. pl. 4, figs. 20—27). Obolella is a genus only ranging from the lower part of the Middle Cambrian to the base of the Upper Cambrian. Obolella plicata, Hicks (Davidson, 1. c. pl. 4, f. 6). Obolella, sp. small and round. The species of all the horny Brachiopods are very difficult to separate one from the other. Palearca socialis, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. pl. 11 , fig. 13, p. 344). The genus is bet- ter represented in the Bala rocks (see Mid- dle Bala). Ctenodonta elongata, Hicks (undescribed). The genus like Nucula, but the ligament ex- ternal. Ctenodonta rotunda, Hicks (undescribed). Theca Harknessi, Hicks (undescribed). The surface finely reticulated by striae in two directions. Conularia Corium, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. mi. p. 355, pl. 11 a, fig. 11). A very large and thin species, with perfectly smooth sides, and a squarish section. Like C. pyra- midata, Desl. from Normandy, and possibly the same. Orthoceras, small sp. The genus is rare in this formation. Numbers and Localities. a. 485, Ramsey 1, N. End. Base of the whole group. (Dr. Hicks.) Carn Goran, Cornwall, in hard quartzite. a. 291, Lower Arenig rocks, St. David's. (Dr. Hicks, 1869.) a. 57, White Grit Mine, Shelve. (Mr. R. Light- body.) a. 292, Tremenheere, St. David’s. (Dr. Hicks.) b.359, Ty Obry, near Garth, Portmadoc. (Mr. Hom- fray.) b. 359, Ty Obry, Portma- doc. (Mr. Homfray.) a. 469, Ramsey I, North End. (Dr. Hicks.) a. 469, Ramsey I, N. End. (Same slab as last.) a. 299, Upper Arenig rocks, Whitesand Bay. (Dr. Hicks.) b. 3638, Ty Obry, Garth. (Mr. Homfray.) b. 349, Ty Obry, do. (Mr. Homfray.) LOWER BALA GROUP. bo or UppreR CamBriaAN (Cambro-Silurian of some authors; Lower Silurian of Murchison; &c.). As there has been much controversy respecting the name to be borne by the rocks overlying the primordial or “Ffestiniog” group, and underlying the “ May Hill Sandstone;” a table of equivalents is here added, which may serve to guide students to the cases, and harmonize the modern text-books with the ‘Synopsis’ pub- lished in 1851-2 by Prof. Sedgwick and McCoy, which is the basis of this Catalogue. Sir R. I. Murcurson. 1831—1859. Llandovery rocks, in 1859. Caradoc Sandstone and Llandeilo flags (Lower Silurian). Lingula flags (base of Lower Silurian). Cambrian, or Long- mynd rocks. Sir H. pr 1a Brcue, and Grou. Surv. 1840—1866. Pror. Prinuies. 1855. BarranveE, to 1860. Sir W. Locan and E. Bruiryes, to 1866. J. W. Sauter, 1864—1866-9., SEDGWICE. 1832—1853. Upper Caradoc, or Upper Llandovery (Upper Silurian). Lower Llandovery. Caradoc or Bala. Llandeilo. Lower Llandeilo. Tremadoc. Lingula Beds. Cambrian. Wenlock. May Hill. Llandovery. Caradoe or Bala. Llandeilo. Tremadoc. Ffestiniog Group. Etage E. base. Etage D. 5. Etage D. 4. Etage D. 3. Etage D. 2. Etage D. 1. Blank here, not no- ticed by M. Barrande. tage C. Harlech and Bangor | Etage B. Group. Clinton Group. Anticosti Group. Hudson River Gr. Trenton Group. Black River Group. Bird’s Eye Group. Quebee Group. Chazy Group. Potsdam Group. St John’s Group. Huronian, Upper Wenlock. Lower Wenlock. May Hill Group. Llandovery Group. Caradoc or Bala Group. Llandeilo Group. Arenig or Skiddaw Group. Upper Tower Tremadoc. Upper ) Ffestiniog Middle Group. Menevian Group. Harlech Group. Longmynd Group. Upper CamBrian (Lower Bala Group: Middle Bala: Upper Bala). Wenlock Group. Denbigh flag. May Hill Sandstone. Upper Bala. Lower Bala. Arenig Group. Tremadoc Group. Ffestiniog Group. Harlech Group. Longmynd Group. The ‘Lower Bala’ of the Synopsis (Introd. p. xx.) was made to include the dark earthy slates, with occasional bands of limestone, such as are exhibited on the east flank of the Arenig range; the Mynydd Tarw and Craig-y-glyn above Llanarmon, in the Berwyn Mountains, and the black slates about Bangor and the flanks of Snowdon. limestone, and that limestone itself. Further research, however, by the Geological Survey has shewn that these dark earthy slates, with occasional limestone, are the equivalent of the black slates and limestones of 8. Wales, collectively known as the Llandeilo flag in its modern signification *. It also comprehended the arenaceous deposits on the W. side of Bala lake, below the Bala Prof. Sedgwick therefore permits me to restrict the term to the * The original ‘Llandeilo flag’ comprehended much more, and many higher beds, of different ages; and could not, at the time of the It is much better understood now. publication of the ‘Synopsis,’ be at all accurately identified. 4 26 UPPER CAMBRIAN. earthy slates and limestones which contain, in favourable localities, a distinct fauna. They are directly com- parable with the Orthoceratite limestones of Sweden, the Bird’s Eye and Black River limestones of N. America. The Moffat group of 8S. Scotland and the wpper Skiddaw slate are part of the series. The new term, ‘Middle Bala’ group, is adopted here for the Bala limestone and its associated sandstones and slates, several thousand feet thick in N. Wales, but reduced to a minimum in S. Wales, where it appears as dark incoherent schist. In Shropshire this series is known as the Caradoc sandstone, with its Horderly lime- stone. The ‘Oskarskal’ group of Sweden (Regio VI. Trinucleorum of Prof. Angelin, the ‘Stratum quartum’ of Linneus) represents this group. It is the Trenton and Hudson River group of N. America, and the major part of Barrande’s great fossil-bearing formation Etage D. belongs to it. (The Coniston limestone: the limestone of Kildare: the Craig Head limestone of Ayrshire: the Peebles limestone: all are of this age.) ‘Upper Bala’ comprehends the Aber Hirnant beds above the Bala limestone, with a peculiar set of fossils: the lower portion of the Coniston flag, viz., that conformable to the limestone; and indeed all beds above the Bala limestone and beneath the May Hill sandstone. In the Bala and Coniston sections, we do not indeed quite reach the horizon of the Llandovery rocks, with their peculiar fauna—Petraia, Atrypa, Pentamerus, &e. But the group ‘Upper Bala’ was made to include all the beds, whether near Meifod, or Welchpool, or near Llan- wddyn, Montgomeryshire, which lie above the Bala limestone, and wnder the ‘unconformable’ cover of the Denbigh- shire grit and flag. There is therefore both propriety and symmetry in retaining the name ‘Upper Bala’ for those beds (having on the whole a distinct fauna) which lie above the Bala limestone. The group includes, in ascending order— (a Hirnant limestone = Coniston flag, the lower part only (Ash Gill; Coldwell, &c.) iter and slate (Sedgw.). above the Coniston limestone. Not the Brathay or Horton (Sedgwick). eo 2. Llandovery beds:— So called by Murchison from the locality where they are best Phillips, Salter, &e. exhibited. The group has received much illustration of (Lower Llandovery, late years. It is the ‘Mathyrafal limestone’ near Meifod, Murchison) Medina of Sedgwick. It skirts all the lower border of the Denbigh Sandstone, North flags and grits, from a point a few miles S. of Bala to America, Builth: and then rising out from under the May Hill group at Llandovery, ranges to the sea in Pembrokeshire. It is the great fossiliferous group at Haverfordwest. Its parallel in Westmorland has not yet been found*, unless part of the Coniston flag (lower) belongs to it. But in S. Scotland it is conspicuous at Dalquorhan and Mullock in Ayrshire. In Galway the fossiliferous rocks of Maume and Cong belong in great part to it. [But the Irish collection is kept separate, and will be catalogued to follow the British one.] N.B. In the list of localities in the Synopsis, p. 326, &c., the terms Upper and Lower Bala are sometimes vaguely used, owing to the absence of data at that time for a clear definition of the fossil horizons. It is requested, therefore, that the student will consider all the Bala groups of the Synopsis as one, and consult the collection for their division into the modern groups. For the placing of many of the fossils under these special geological subdivisions, I am alone responsible. But having studied N. Wales under Prof. Sedgwick, 8. Wales under Sir H. de la Beche, and having been engaged for seventeen years working at the Silurian and Cambrian fossils of the Geological Survey, Prof. Sedgwick trusts me to arrange them according to the present state of our knowledge, 1867. The Bala group or Upper Cambrian of Sedgwick therefore consists of— UPPER Lower Bala = Llandeilo flag (Upper Llandeilo, Geol. Survey, the Arenig being the lower). Camprian. } Middle Bala = Caradoc sandstone, and Bala rocks (Geol. Survey and Sir R. I. Murchison). (Sedgw.) Upper Bala = Caradoc shales, Hirnant limestone, and Lower Llandovery rock (Geol. Survey). All these are unconformably overlaid by the ‘May Hill Sandstone’ or Clinton group, which forms the base of the Silurian (Sedgwick) or Upper Silurian (Murchison). * Mr. T. McK. Hughes has lately found the equivalents of the Llandovery rock near Coniston, &¢e. It consists of mudstone, conglomerate, and beds of Graptolites like those of Barrande’s Etage E. 1, which surely, for many reasons, is a Llandovery group. J.W.S. Lower Bata Group (earthy dark slates and limestones). LOWER BALA GROUP. N. and S. Wales. bo ~T S. Scotland. S. Ireland. Case and Column of Drawers. Gk Gk (case). Gk (case). Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Syn. Pl. 18, f. 2, p. 6. ld LLDPE} ce 2», Pliz,f3,p4 (G. Millepeda, Pl. 18, f. 6, p. 5.) Pl. 18, f. 4, 5, p. 6. (Grapt. Convolutus, p. 3.) Mead Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Zoophyta or Bryozoa. Graptolithus, Auct. The simple one-sided Graptolites, with close-set cells, are the only species now called Graptolithus. The Grap- tolithus of Linnzeus, Syst. Nat. ed. 1, seems to be our Diplograpsus (Carruthers). Graptolithus Sedgwickii, Portlock, Geol. Rep. pl. 19, fig. 1—3; Harkness, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Vol. vi. p. 60. A well-marked species, with curious straight spine-like pro- cesses to the cell mouths. Graptolithus Hisingeri, Carruthers (Geol. Mag. 1868, p. 126). G. sagittarius, His. not Linn. There seems little doubt that Linnzeus de- scribed under this name a fossil plant instead of a graptolite. The species is excluded from all other strata except the Lower Bala (or Llandeilo flag), and is common therein. Graptolithus lobiferus, McCoy (G. Becki, Bar- rande). A form with the cell-ends so tumid as to give a very peculiar appearance. (@. millepeda, McCoy, is the young thereof, as suggested by himself.) Graptolithus Nilssoni, Barrande, Grapt. Bo- héme, pl. 2, figs. 16,17. Narrow stem, and short cells. Graptolithus tenuis, Portlock, Geol. Rep. Londondy. and Tyrone, p. 319, pl. 19, fig. 7. A narrow thin-stemmed short-celled species. Rastrites (Graptolithus) convolutus, Hisinger, sp. (Leth. Suec. t. 35, fig. 7). Rastrites triangulatus, Salter and Harkness (Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Vol. vit. p. 59). Rastrites peregrinus, Barr. may be the young of R. convolutus (Grapt. Bohéme, pl. 4, fig.6). Moffat, Dumfries. [A note at p. 366 of the Synopsis explains that the specimens labelled Lockerby are from various localities near Moffat and Beattock Bridge. ] Moffat, Dumfries. a. 59, Moffat. a. 58 (G. millepeda); do. Moffat, and common in N. Wales. a. 68, Moffat, Dumfries (common in 8. Wales also. J.W.S.). Moffat (not Lockerby), Sedgw. a. 60 (as G. con- volutus), Moffat, id. Moffat. 28 UPPER CAMBRIAN. Case and Column of Drawers. Gh or case above. Referenee to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Diplograpsus rectangularis, Rigi ets 8: Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Rastrites maximus, Carruthers (Geol. Mag. 1868, p. 126). A species with very large cells. Diplograpsus Folium, Hisinger (Leth. Suec. t. 35, fig. 8). The double-ranked Graptolites were first distinguished by McCoy in 1851 as Diplograpsus. Diplograpsus angustifolius, Hall (Pal. N. Y. ul. p. 515). The young states of Diplograp- sus have been shewn by Prof. Hall to be single trispinous cells. Diplograpsus mucronatus, Hall (Pal. N.Y. Vol. I. p. 268, t. 73, fig. 1). Diplograpsus pristis, Hisinger? (Leth. Suec. p- 114, t. 35, fig. 5. Fucoides dentatus, Brong. Grapt. foliaceus, Beck. Sil. Syst.). One of the numerous varieties or species referred to this almost cosmopolitan form. Mr. Car- ruthers figures it with long thread-like radi- cles, and believes this to be the true species of Hisinger. Diplograpsus pristis 8, McCoy. A variety fi- gured by Prof. Hall; with broader and more triangular teeth. Diplograpsus persculptus, Salter MSS. (Carru- thers, Geol. Mag. 1868, p. 130). A beautiful undescribed form, very distinct in its sculp- ture from D. pristis. Climacograpsus, Hall, cells in double row, but excavated, not projecting. The stem cylin- drical (Grapt. Quebec, p. 111). Climacograpsus scalaris, Linn. sp. (rapt. sca- laris of Linn. in Skanska Resa, p. 1477. (Carruthers, lc. fully cleared up.) Grapt. teretiusculus, Hisinger, Leth. Suec. t. 38, fig. 4, suppt. Diplograpsus teretiusculus, Salter, Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Vol. vir. pl. 21, figs. 3,4. [D. rectangularis, McCoy, is only a variety with closer cells]. [ Moffat. ] a. 63, Moffat, Dumfries- shire. (Sedgw.) [Moffat (Carruthers). ] a. 66, Cairn Ryan, Wig- tonshire. a. 62, Conway Castle, N. Wales. Pen-y-goylan, Llandeilo. Pen Cerrig, Builth. a. 72, Moffat. a. 64, Pumpsant, near Do- laucothi, in Caermarthen- shire. (J. W. Salter.) Anglesea. Moffat. a. 61 (D. rectangularis), Moffat, McCoy. Case and Column of Drawers. G | Not of p. 5, nor in the Synopsis. and Gk Gk LOWER BALA GROUP. Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Pl. 18, f. 11, 12, p. 10. Corals, p. 24. Paleopora interstincta, p. 15. Names and References; Observations, &. Numbers and Localities. Climacograpsus bicornis, Hall (Grapt. Quebec, p. 111). Didymograpsus sextans. A common American species. The twin branches (éévjos) in this genus of Prof. McCoy’s diverge at once from a minute radicle: and have the cells on the inner edges of each branch: but in this species and many others the stems diverge so widely as to be bent backwards (Pal. N. Y. Vol. 1. p. 273, t. 74, fig. 3). Didymograpsus Murchisoni, Bock. Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 1, fig. 1. An extremely com- mon Lower Bala (Llandeilo flag) species in N. and 8. Wales—especially at Abereiddy Bay. The branches are strictly parallel and are broad. Protovirgularia dichotoma, McCoy. A very interesting form, branched like Dichograp- sus, but with large cells or groups of cells in double rows; and according to Prof. McCoy, very like the living Virgularia. ZOOPHYTA proper. (Actinozoa, Actinaria, Zoantharia, Coelenterata of various authors). Stenopora fibrosa, Goldf. sp. (Pet. Germ. pl. 28, figs. 3, 4). The commonest of all Millepore corals in the older Paleozoic rocks. Stenopora ramulosa, Phill. sp. (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol.11. pt.1,p.385 as var.1 of S. fibrosa.) Nebulipora favulosa, Phill. (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 11. p. 282, pl. 19, fig. 10). A more ir- regular species than the N. lens, so common in Middle Bala rocks. The coral consists of minute tubes, of which the fertile ones are in enlarged clusters (Monticulipora, Edw. & Haime, is a nearly contemporary name). Heliolites interstincta Linn. sp. (Edw. & Haime, Pal. Monogr. pl. 57, fig. 9). It is doubtful if this be the species, but so named by McCoy. [Extremely common in the Lower Bala.] a. 65 (Diplograpsus? Mc- Coy), Cairn Ryan, Wigton- shire, a. 64, Abereiddy Bay, Pem- brokeshire. (J. W. Salter.) a. 71, Near Moffat, Dum- friesshire. (Prof. Sedg- wick.) Golden Grove, Llandeilo, Tregib, Llandeilo. Llandeilo. a. 69, Llandeilo. UPPER CAMBRIAN. Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Names and References; Observations, &c. part only. p. 128, p. 129. Worm tubes and tracks, Pl. 18, £13, p. 10. Serpulites dispar, p. 132 in p. 129. ECHINODERMATA. Crinoid, and probably Cystidean fragments, but of unknown species and genera, are common in the limestone of Craig-y-Glyn and Craig-y-Beri, Llanrhaiadr. ANNELIDA. Pyritonema fasciculus, McCoy. The analogy between this bundle of tubes and the skeleton of the glass plant polype is very close. But the real affinity is most probably with the straight-tubed gregarious Serpule, such as are found in the carboniferous rocks, Serpula parallela for instance. In proof of this there occurs another species, which has the tubes separate. Pyritonema , sp. Loose tubes in green- ish voleanic grit. N.B. The following 4 species are in all lists included in the Lower Bala or Llandeilo flag, but it is quite probable they are of Middle Bala age. Nemertites Olivantii, McLeay (Sil. Syst. pl. 27, fig. 4), Superficial trails of long worms (Helminthites ?). Myrianites McLeayii, Murchison (Sil. Syst. pl. 27, fig. 3). Impression of the trail of a rather long worm, in zigzag folds. At one end we seem to have the impression of the animal itself, with its lateral feet or bundles of sete. Nereites Sedgwickii, McLeay. Sil. Syst. pl. 27, fig. 2. The large foliaceous gill-plates and cirrhi are strongly shewn in this imprint. It is the original figured specimen. Numbers and Localities. a. 70, Craig-y-Glyn, Llan- rhaiadr. a. 73, Tregib, Llandeilo. [This is the specimen on which was founded the supposed fish-defence from the Llandeilo flag, The resemblance is very great at first, but I had no excuse for the blunder, which mis- led others. J. W.S,] Tan-y-craig, N. of Builth. a. 76. Also in Shale, at Tre-coed, 3m. N. of Builth. a. 72, Llampeter, S. Wales. a. 75, Llampeter. a. 74, Llampeter. [N.B. This species also occurs at Aberystwith, in Middle Bala rocks.] Case and Column of Drawers. G case case Gk Gk Gk Gk Reference to McCov’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. LOWER BALA GROUP. Names and References; Observations, &c. Worms continued. p. 129. Bivalve Crustacea. Pl. 11, f. 2 (Cytheropsis). 00 0 Beyrichia, Pl. 1, £. 3, p. 136. Trilobites. Diplorrhina triplicata. Syn. Pl. 18, f. 11, p. 142 oO ANUS, (T. gibbifrons and T. Caractact in part, pp. 144, 5.) Nereites Cambrensis, McLeay, (Sil. Syst. t. 27, fig. 1). It isa mistake to represent this as a very long worm. Its trails are visible for some length: four or five individuals on the slab having traversed some space (marked by a simple line) and been imbedded at the end of their trail. In one case the worm has again retreated, before death, along the line made by his track. Crustacea. Phyllopods and Trilobites:— No higher orders than bivalved and Apus-like Entomostraca, with Trilobites, have been detected in any beds beneath the May Hill Sandstone. Cythere (Cytheropsis) Aldensis, McCoy. A mi- nute smooth bivalve shell, slightly curved. Such species are abundant everywhere; and have been mostly left for description to Prof. R, Jones. Primitia, one or two species (Prof. R. Jones). Beyrichia complicata, Salter, Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 11. pt. 1, pl. 8. fig. 16, p. 295, Vol. m1. pl. 19, fig. 9. Beyrichie are bivalved Crustacea, with lobed and furrowed carapaces. Trilobita. Agnostus MacCoyii, Salter. Decades Geol.Surv. x1. pl. 1, figs. 6, 7. Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 111. p.297, pl. 13, fig.8. Very common in Llandeilo flag. Only generally, not minutely like the Bohemian species figured by Barrande and Corda, Agnostusisthe simplest of all trilobites. Agnostus to determine. , Sp. not quite perfect enough Trinucleus favus, Salter (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. ll. p. 320, pl. 13, fig. 9). This is distin- guished by the square form and honeycomb- structure of the fringe, the outer cells being largest;—like those of drone-cells in a comb. 31 Numbers and Localities. a.'72*, Llampeter, S. Wales, the figured specimen. Pro- bably Middle Bala. The rolling system of S. Wales consists, as we now know, of Upper and Middle Bala rocks, a. 77, Aldeans Limestone. Stinchar River. a. 77%, Lower Caradoc Shales, Shineton, Buildwas, Lower Shales, Shineton, near Buildwas, Shropshire. Pont-y-meibion, Llanarmon, N. Wales (coll. by Prof. Sedgwick and J. W. Salter, 1842). a. 86, Pen Cerrig, N. of Builth. It occurs every- where, but sparingly in 8. Wales, in these rocks. Shineton, Buildwas. a. 980, Llandeilo. Pres. by Mr. T. McK. Hughes. From Tregib, and Golden Grove, Llandeilo. (McCoy has la- belled some of these 7. gibbifrons). Craig-y-beri, Llanarmon fach. 32 UPPER CAMBRIAN. eee Reference to McCoy’s L : Column of ‘ 5 Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Drawers. Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. G | Tretaspis, p.146. Pl.15, f.16.| Trinucleus fimbriatus, Murchison (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 4, fig. 7). A species with a narrow furrowed border; the puncta in rows. 'ri- As var. of T. gibbifrons, p. 145. nucleus is a simple trilobite: no eyes or | 3 m, North of Builth (as facial suture. The seemingly complex punc- | 7 gibbifrons, var.) tate border is remarkable, but very easily explainable as a series of spines connected by transverse processes. G p. 148. Ampyx nudus, Murch. Decades Geol. Surv. 2, | a.101, Builth. [The Tregib pl. 10. A remarkable genus like Trinucleus, | locality is erroneous] A. but with long front- and side-spines to the | latus, Builth. Abereiddy G PL.1e, f.13, p. 147. head. Ampyx latus, McCoy, is only a var. | Bay, Pembrokeshire. (Dr. of the preceding, distorted. Hicks.) Gk Conocoryphe monile, Salter, n. sp. Glabella | b. 167, Shineton Shales, lobed, the front marginal furrow dotted. Buildwas. Gk Conocoryphe or Triarthrus, A small species, | Shineton Shales, Buildwas. probably of Triarthrus, an Upper Bala genus | [It is possible that the in N. America. This was formerly thought | locality may include some an Olenus; and the shales were therefore | Tremadoc beds.] called Olenus shales. Gk églina, sp. The genus has six body segments, do. and enormous eyes covering the side of the head. It is European only, and strictly a Bala fossil (Lower and Middle Bala). A@glina, sp. imperfect. The species are nume- do. rous. G Ogygia corndensis, Murchison (Salter, Mon. | a, 84, Builth. Brit. Tril. p. 130, pl. 16). A broad axis for the genus. G Ogygia Buchii, Brongniart (Salter, Mon. Brit. | Wellfield, Builth; and Pen Tril. pl. 14,15). Male and female specimens | Cerrig, Builth. of this, the fattest of all Trilobites, and pro- Ogygia. bably with the most immoveable segments. Gk Ogygia angustissima, Salter, Mon. Brit. Tril. | [Builth. Presented by Mr. p- 129, pl. 14, figs. 8, 9, may be only a variety of Ogygia Buchat. T. McK. Hughes. ] LOWER BALA GROUP. 33 Column of Drawers. Gk G G Gk Gk Gh Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Ogygia, p. 149. Pl. 1¥, f. 2. Synopsis, Pl. 1r, f.1, p. 149. Pl. 1F, f. 14, p. 155, C. brevicapitata, Pl. 1 F, f£. 4 C. Baylet, Pl. 18, f. 8, p. 165. Jel, Tes, 18 WSs, Osh Barrandia (Ogygia) radians, McCoy (Salter, Mon. Brit. Tril. 1866, pl. 19, figs. 1—4). A genus distinguished from Ogygia by the length of the glabella, and its shape. Barrandia Cordai, McCoy (Salter, Mon. Brit. Tril. 1866, pl. 19, fig. 5). Short, oval, smooth. Asaphus? sp. with a short tail-piece. [Lichas patriarchus, Edgell, Geol. Mag. 1866, p. 162. The earliest species of this genus known in Britain. See Middle Bala for genus.] Cheirurus (Eccoptochile) Sedgwickii, McCoy. A remarkable, large, trilobite, more expanded than any other of the British forms; they are mostly very convex. A kindred species occurs in Bohemia, Calymene Cambrensis, Salter (Mon. Brit. Tril. pl. 9, figs. 12—14). This has been included under C. Baylei, Barrande, and also C. bre- vicapitata Portl. by McCoy; but the last is a Middle Bala species, and no Bohemian forms are identical with ours. Homalonotus bisulcatus, Salter(Mon. Brit. Tril. 1865, pl. 10, figs. 8—10). Homalonotus was a long-lived genus, and of all the more per- fect trilobites the least trilobed. Asaphus (Isotelus) laticostatus, McCoy, not of Green. The Asaphus laticostatus of Green isa Phacops. (See Salter, Mon. Brit. Tril. 1866, p. 158, pl. 18, fig. 6.) Asaphus tyrannus, Murch. (Salter, Mon. Brit. Tril, pl. 21, 22.) One of the largest of all known trilobites: sometimes a foot or more in length. Mr. Hughes’ specimen (981) must have been rather more, It is as character- istic of the Lower Bala as the A. Powisti is of Middle Bala rocks. a. 80, Pen Cerrig, Builth. (A most prolific locality, full of the fry of Trilobites.) a. 79, Pen Cerrig, Builth. Shineton, Buildwas. Pont Ladies Quarry, Llan- deilo. a. 78, N. of Builth. a. 97, Llandeilo. Porth Treuddyn, Caernar- vonshire (in beds supposed to be = the dark earthy, slates of the Ffestiniog slate quarries). a. 208, Maen Goran, Builth. a. 83, Llandeilo. a. 85, Tre- gib. a. 82, Craig-y-Glyn, Llanarmon, N. Wales. a. 981, Llandeilo. A fine large specimen. (Mr. T. McK. Hughes.) 34 eee Reference to McCovy’s Drawers. Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. G UN A. tyrannus, labrum. G_ | Also &. latus (part), p. 172 (not the figure). Gk Lamp shells. Gk Pseudo-Crania, p. 187. Pl. 15, f. 1. G p. 252. G p. 253. G G p. 251. UPPER CAMBRIAN. Names and References; Observations, &c. | Numbers and Localities. Asaphus peltastes, Salter (Mon. Brit. Tril. pl. 22, figs. 1—4). A smaller and more convex species, with larger eyes, a narrower head, and fewer tail segments. Ilenus crassicauda, Wahl.? (Ill. latus McCoy in part). A caudal shield only: and proba- bly the only specimen known—of this com- mon Swedish species—in British rocks. (See Salter, Mon. Brit. Tril. 1866, p. 181, wood- cut, fig. 44.) Mollusca Brachiopoda. Discina? sp. Species of this genus occur every- where in all rocks, ancient and modern. Crania divaricata, McCoy. More common in Middle Bala rocks: the free unattached spe- cies of Crania may deserve separation. Lingula Ramsayi, Salter (Dav. Sil. Brach. p. 55, pl. 3, figs. 4952). Portugal and Sweden. ness) Rhiwlas, Bala, chara Orthoceras, smooth species. Holbeck gill (in nodules). Gm Pl. 11, fig. 30, p. 316. Orthoceras politum, McCoy (Quart. Journ. Geol. | a. 172, Glenquhaple. Soc., Vol. 7, pl. 10, figs. 5, 6). Gm do. Orthoceras, smooth species, with closer septa | Pusgill, Dufton (green than O. vagans above quoted. slate). Gm p: 319. Orthoceras bilineatum, Hall, Pal. N. York, t.43, | Coniston (? Upper Bala). f. 2, 3 (Siluria, 3rd ed. p. 200). a. 172*, Ardwell, Girvan. MIDDLE BALA GROUP. Names and References: Observations, &ce. Prosar ae Reference to McCoy’s Drawers: Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Gm | | | Gm p. 319. | Gm » do. Gm do. | Gm | ) | an p. 323. Gian Pl. 11, fig. 26, p. 323. Appendix A. p. VII. Trocholites, p. 324. Numbers and Localities Orthoceras, sp. allied to O. dulce, Barrande. The ribs apparently visible on the cast. (Ringed or Annulate species— Cycloceras, McCoy.) Orthoceras annulatum, Sow. A cosmopolite species, at least in N. Hemisphere. Orthoceras Ibex, Sow. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 29, | figs. 3, 4). Orthoceras arcuoliratum, Hall (Pal. N.Y. 1. pl. 42, fig. 7). Ormoceras, Stokes. Differs from ordinary Or- thoceras in having the siphuncle thicker and formed of bead-like pieces. Ormoceras , new sp. Lituites cornu-arietis, Sow. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 7, fig. 10). Lituites anguiformis (Trocholites, Hall), The Trocholites have usually whorls, wider than they are deep; ¢.e. the transverse diameter is greater than that from back to front. | Lituites (Trocholites) planorbiformis, Conrad (Salter, Mem. Geol. Surv. 11. pl. 25, fig. 5). a. 176*, Holbeck gill (no- dules in slate rock). a. 176, Coniston. Coniston. a. 171, Wrae Quarry, Up- per Tweed. a. 170, Cymmerig Brook, Bala. a. 230, Coniston. a. 165, Mynydd Fron Frys, near Chirk. a. 162, Cymmerig Brook Bala. =I bo UPPER CAMBRIAN. Upper BALA Group, Sedgw. (restricted in 1866. The Upper Bala of the Synopsis includes the Bala limestone, now Middle Cambrian). 1. Hirnant Limestone and Llanfyllin beds—viz., pale coloured slates above the Bala limestone. Ash Gill slates, &c., above the Coniston Limestone. 2. Llandovery Rocks (Phillips, Salter, Lyell—Lower Llandovery of the Survey). The fossils of these two divisions are arranged together in the cases and drawers, as it is clearly impossible always to draw a line between them; and they form indeed one series. But the list is kept in two separate columns here, as each group contains a few peculiar species. And it may eventually be proved that No. 2 is unconformable on No. 1. The conglomerates and grits of the Llandovery rock do not appear everywhere under the covering of the Silurian rocks, because these are unconformable on them. But wherever we rise to beds far above the level of the Bala limestone, a profusion of corals, Bryozoa and Brachiopoda of the smaller kinds, take the places of the characteristic Bala limestone shells. I arrange Ash Gill beds (above the Coniston limestone) with this division; but not that upper portion of the Coniston flags known as the Brathay flagstone, for that is the base (or nearly) of the Silurian series. Case and , Column of IEE porence ee Oy S Names and References: Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Drawers. |SYBopsis: and Figures of Genera. Upper Bala proper. Llandovery Group. Nidulites, Salter. So called from a.185,Mullock quarry, its resemblance to the egg cap- Dalquorhan, Girvan. sules of marine Gasteropods espe- cially of Natica. The differences are obvious. Gu Sponges ? Nidulites favus, Salter (Quart. Jour. | [This is one of the Paleopora favosa. Geol. Soc. Vol. vi. p. 174; Siluria, | commonest of fossils Veil, iL Gh, iver, Bh jo, 1s}, in part only. ty 3rd ed. Foss. 30, fig. 3). A curious fossil, having exactly the aspect of miniature honey-comb. The structure is as follows: a thin undulated plate, to which are attached on each side minute hexagonal cups (a pit at the base of each shews the point of attach- ment), alternating in either face, just like the comb cells, but with a length and breadth of only a line. in the same forma- tion at Haverford- west. Kindred forms are probably to be sought in Sphero- spongia, a middle Bala fossil. ] Case and Column of Drawers. |Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Go Go Go Reference to McCoy’s F, alveolaris, var, p. 19. Paleopora, p. 18. UPPER BALA GROUP. Names and References; Observations, &c. Nebulipora (Monticulipora of Milne Edwards and Haime is earlier). Nebulipora sp. Stenopora fibrosa, Goldfuss (See ante, p. 29). The genus Ste- nopora is not admitted by all writers; but seems to be founded on sufficient characters. Accord- ing to Lonsdale and McCoy, the tubes have no connecting pores. [N.B. As a rule, individual corals are extremely abundant, but the species few, in the Llandovery rocks. | S. fibrosa, var. ramulosa, Phill. (Mem. Geol. Surv. m1. pt. 1, p. 307). A narrow-branched coral which is quite common, and may be a distinct species, or even a Che- tetes. Favosites alveolaris, Goldf. (Ff. as- pera, D’Orb. Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 40, fig. 2). Favosites multipora, Lonsdale (Si- luria, 2nd ed. pl. 40, fig. 5). A very doubtful fossil, since it is all but impossible, save for the ex- panded form, to distinguish it from the £. aspera which accom- panies it. Numerous rows of pores are figured on the tubes by Lonsdale. Heliolites tubulata, Lonsdale, Sil. 4th ed. pl. 39, fig. 3. 73 Numbers and Localities. Upper Bala proper. Llandovery Group. __ Mathyrafal ffrid. b. 183, very common at Mathyrafal ffrid, near Meifod. [As this locality is often quoted, we shall ab- breviate it to the first word. | Allt Goch, and other places near Llan- fyllin. do. do. b. 171, Llanfyllin, b. 184, Allt Goch, Llanfyllin; Goleu- goed, near Llando- very; Mathyrafal, 8. Wales; Mullock, Gir- van. b. 186, Mathyrafal, as before; b. 185, Allt Goch, _—_ Llanfyllin ; Goleugoed. b. 187, Allt Goch, Goleugoed; Mullock. 10 74 UPPER CAMBRIAN. Case and Column of Go Paleopora, p. 16. Pl. 1 ©, fig. 4. Go Paleopora, p. 17. Go p. 26. Go Cup- Corals. Reference to McCoy’s Drawers, /Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. See figure, p. 75. Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Heliolites megastoma, McCoy (Si- luria, 1867, p. 188, Foss. 30, fig. 7). Heliolites subtilis, McCoy. Narrow branches, very small cells. Halysites catenulatus, Linn. (chain- coral). This long-lived and wide- ly spread coral ranges throughout all the Upper Cambrian and the Silurian formations. It is most abundant in limestone, but has no sort of antipathy to slate, shale, sand, or fine grit. It must have inhabited various depths of water. PETRAIA.—Munster and Phillips. (Turbinolopsis of Lonsdale.) One of the commonest and simplest of all the Cambrian or Silurian cup-corals. The calyx is so deep, and so strongly ribbed by the toothed lamelle, that the conical matrix left in this part (frequently all we have preserved), shews all the characters necessary for dis- tinguishing the many varieties, or species, as they are supposed to be. The changes from the young to the adult state are not yet sufficiently known, to pre- vent us from multiplying species on the characters drawn from the lamellae. The base of the cup, a solid mass of twisted lamelle, or tabulz, is short or long, large or minute, in proportion to the cup, in the various species. To Prof. Phillips and Prof. McCoy we are chiefly indebted for de- scriptions of the species. Upper Bala proper. Llandovery Group. b. 188, Mathyrafal. a. 200*, Dalquorrhan, Mullock, Girvan. b. 189, Mathyrafal; b. 190, Goleugoed. Case and Column of Drawers. case G Go Go Reference to McCoy's Synopsis : and Figures of Genera. UPPER BALA GROUP. ~I Or Names and References ; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Pl. 1 8, fig. 26, p. 40. Pl. 1 8, fig. 26 6, p. 41. PI. 1 B, fig. 25, p. 41. p. 40. Pits: 5! = p. 40. do. do. Pl. 1 8, fig. 25, p. 41. p. 40. fig. 23, p. 39. ———— Petraia subduplicata, McCoy. A very common form, of which the next variety is the more frequent form. The main lamelle and the intermediate ones are nearly of the same size, at least near the edge of the cup. Petraia subduplicata, var. crenu- lata, McCoy. This is the com- mon Llandovery variety. Petraia uniserialis, McCoy. Small specimens and probably young. Petraia elongata. pl. 38, fig. 6.) (Siluria, 3rd ed. Petraia squisulecata, McCoy. A large species. Petraia rugosa, Phillips (Pal. Foss, Corn. & Devon, pl. 2, fig. 7). A species with very wide cup. Petraia, sp. Petraia, sp. Petraia uniserialis. See above. Petraia rugosa, Phill. See above. (Phil. Pal. Foss. pl. 2, fig. 7). Omphyma, Milne Edwards. Large simple cup-corals with four deep pits in the base of the cup. Llandovery Group. Upper Bala proper. a. 201, Dalquorrhan, Girvan (abundant). On the same tablet are two Middle Bala species for compari- son (p. 43); a. 201*, Haverfordwest, large size (J. W. S. 1863). a, 202, equally com- mon with the above at both localities, and wherever the Llando- very rocks are known; Mathyrafal; plentiful at Haverfordwest. Penlan, Llandovery. One of the best locali- ties for May HillSand- stone—in an arena- ceous and shaly form. a. 202*, Bala; locality doubtful; probably from these beds. Jo Wiss a. 203*, Mullock, Gir- van; Braes, Girvan. Llandovery. Dalquorrhan, Mullock. Mathyrafal, Meifod, a. 203, Llansant- fraid, Glyn Ceiriog ; a. 204, Penarth, (same tablet with last, perhaps Middle Bala); Meifod. 10— bo Go Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. UPPER CAMBRIAN. Names and References; Observations, &c. Glauconome, p. 49. Pl. 16, fig. 16, p. 46. Pl. 16, fig. 15, p. 46. do. Worm-tubes. p- 63. T. annulatus, p. 63. it © Pl. 1 &, fig. 3, p. 136. Trilobites. Portlockia, p. 163. Omphyma turbinata, Linn. (Edw. Monogr, Brit. Fos. Corals, pl. 69, fig. 1). The largest and most common of all the cup-corals, ranging from this formation to the Wenlock, where it is abundant. Siluria, 3rd ed. pl. 39, fig. 11. Ptilodictya, sp. Glauconome disticha, Goldf. (See Pet. Germ. t. 65, fig. 15). Ptilodictya explanata, McCoy (See p. 44). Ptilodictya costellata, McCoy (See p- 44). ECHINODERMATA. Cyathocrinus, cup of some species. ANNELIDA. Tentaculites ornatus, Sow. (Siluria, 3rd ed. pl. 16, fig. 11). Appa- rently the common Dudley species. Tentaculites anglicus, Salter(Siluria, 3rd ed. pl. 1, fig. 3). 7. annulatus, Sil. Syst. The Z. annulatus is a Devonian form without the fine longitudinal striz. CRUSTACEA — Phyllopoda and Trilobita. Beyrichia complicata, Salter (Mem. Geol. Sury. 11. pl. 19, fig. 9). The Trilobites are few in number, and of species chiefly common to Cambrian and Silurian rocks. Phacops Stokesii, Milne Edw. (Salter Mon. Brit. Tril. pl. 2, figs. 1—6). A common species at Dudley. b. 194, Llanfyllin. b. 195, Llanfyllin. Numbers and Localities, Upper Bala proper. Llandovery Group. b. 193, Mathyrafal, Meifod. Mathyrafal, Meifod; Pen-y-Craig, do, b. 197, Dalquorrhan, Mullock, Girvan, Ayr. b. 199, Mullock, Gir- van. b. 200, Pwllheli (? Llandovery, which formation must exist _ there), J. W.S. b. 201, Mathyrafal. b. 202, Mullock, Gir- van, ae a Reference to McCoy’s Drawers, |Synopsis : and Figures of Genera. Harpidella, p. 143. Ceraurus Wilkamsi, p. 155. Pl fee: 0s. Go Go Go Dysplanus centrotus, Pl. 15, fig. 19, p. 173. G Go G C. Blumenbachit, p. 165. C. subdiademata, Pl. 1 F, fig. 9, p. 166. UPPER BALA GROUP. “I “I Names and References; Observations, &c. Cyphaspis megalops, McCoy (Decade Geol. Surv. No. 7, pl. 5). For genus see Wenlock rocks. Cheirurus bimucronatus, Murch. (Decade 7, pl. 2. Mon. Brit. Tril. pl. 5, figs. 1—5). The genus Ce- raurus cannot stand—so ill de- scribed. Menus Thomsoni, Salter (Pal. Mon. Brit. Tril. pl. 28, figs. 2—4). A species quite characteristic of Llandovery beds. The Zileni differ by good but obscure characters. Lichas bulbiceps? Salter and Phillips (Mem. Geol. Sury. 11 Pt. 1, pl. 8, fig. 8). I am not sure of this being the Dudley one. Illenus Bowmanni, Salter (Mon. Brit. Tril. pl. 28, figs. 6—13). One of the characteristic Cam- brian forms which range here also. Encrinurus punctatus, Briinn (Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Vol. 6, p. 158, pl. 32, figs. 1—5). Another fossil which links the Llandovery to the Silurian. Encrinurus punctatus, var. arena- ceus, Salter (Decade 7, Geol. Surv. pl. 4, p. 6). In some beds this variety prevails. Calymene Blumenbachii, Brongn. (Mon. Brit. Tril. pl.8, figs. 7—16). The common Dudley form of the species, which varies much. In the Caradoc the glabella (stomach) is reduced, but attains its full size in the Dudley Limestone. Numbers and Localities. Upper Bala proper. Llandovery Group. b. 203, Mullock, Gir- van. a. 199*, Goleugoed (Mz Williams). a. 183, Mullock. b. 204, Mullock, Gir- van. b. 205, Girvan. Drummock, } b. 206, Mathyrafal. a. 183*, Drummock, near to Girvan; Mul- lock (C. subdiade- mata). UPPER CAMBRIAN. Case and Column of Drawers. Go Go Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Odontochile, p. 161. Pl. 1 G, figs. 15, 16. T. gibbifrons, p. 145. Terebratule, &e. Lamp shells. Spirigerina, p. 197. do. p. 198. Hemithyris, p. 201. Hemithyris, p. 202. Pl. 1g, fig. 10. Phacops obtusicaudatus, Salter (Mon. Brit. Tril. 1864, pl. 1, figs. 4245). A species with the habit of the common Dudley P. caudatus (Dudley butterfly). The tail is blunt. Proetus, sp. Fragments only. Trinucleus concentricus. MOLLUSCA BRACHIOPODA. Lamp shells are very common in the Llandovery rocks, and indeed throughout the Bala series. But the genera Meristella, G. sagittarius, p. 5. HYDROZOA or BRYOZOA. Graptolites priodon, Bronn (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 12, figs. 1, 2). Graptolites Flemingii, Salter (Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vill. p. 390). Differs in the broader shaft, and narrower straight teeth (cells) from the common G. priodon. It is probably a very common species in Lower Wenlock. (G@. sagittarius is a Lower Bala species.) Wales and Shropshire. D. G. Moel Seisiog ; b. 548, Gwyddel- wern, Llanrwst. D.F. b. 549, Pen- y-Craig, Llangynyw ; b.550, Llansantfraid, Glyn Ceiriog (as Di- plograpsus pristis) ; D.G. b. 551, Nant- Gwrhwyd Uchaf ; under Bron Einion. b. 554, D. F. Craig ddu Allt, Llangollen. Westmorland and 8S. of Scotland. C.G. Casterton Fell, N. end. C.F. Common at Helmside, &c. ; b.555, Helms Knot; b. 556, Brathay; a. 244, Re- becca Hill, near UI- verston ; Outrake, near Ulverston; a. 244* D. F. Balmae shore, Kireudbright. a. 245* D. EF. Bal- mae shore, Kircud- bright. 12—2 SILURIAN. Case and Column of Drawers. Gad GaQ Ga8 Gaé GaQ Gaé Gat Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. (Diplograpsus ramosus, Corals. Strephodes pseudoceratites, Pl. 1 8, fig. 20, p. 30. p. 24. Echinodermata, Pl. 1 D, fig. 3, p. 55. Eucalyptocrinus, Pl. 1 D, fig. 2, p. 58? Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Graptolites sp. Very imperfect, but certainly Graptolithus. Retiolites Geinitzianus, Barr. (Silu- ria, 3rd ed. p. 541. Foss. 90, fig. 2). ZOOPHYTA—ANTHOZOA. Cyathophyllum pseudoceratites ? McCoy’s figured specimen. Stenopora fibrosa, Goldf. (Siluria, 3rd ed. pl. 40, figs. 6, 7). Petraia, small sp. (See May Hill Sandstone). Favosites Gothlandica, Linn. (Silu- ria, 2nd ed. foss. 17, figs. 2, 3). Favosites, sp. (aspera ?) just possibly a Dictyocaris (MS.). ECHINODERMATA. Actinocrinus pulcher, Salter. The common flagstone species. The stems are tubercular, the pelvis small. The arms sinuous and much branched. It appears to be often attached to Orthoceras, as if it had floated. Hypanthocrinus? (H. polydactylus, See Wenlock). Glyptocrinus, sp. For genus see Wenlock Limestone. Wales and Shropshire. | Westmorland and S. of a. 454, D. G. Pentre cwm dda. a. 459, W.L. Old Radnor road, Pres- teign. b. 560, W. L. Old Radnor. b. 562, D. F. Llan- gynyw Rectory, Montgomeryshire. b. 563, W. L. Old Radnorto Presteign. b. 565, D. F. Nant- Gwrhwyd Uchaf, Llangollen. b. 567, W. L. Old Radnor. b. 569, D. G. Plas Madoc. Scotland. b.558,D.F. Old Slate Quarry, Ulverston to Ireleth. b. 561, C. F. Helms Knot; Howgill Fell. a. 463, D. F. Balmae shore, Kireudbright. b. 566 (cast). C. F. Osmotherly Common, Ulverston. Case and Column of Drawers. = GaQ9 Gaé6 Gaé Ga8 Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Worm tubes. Trilobites. Odontochile caudata, var. minor, p. 161. Odontochile, p. 160. Portlockia, p. 163. Brachiopods. LOWER WENLOCK GROUP. 93 Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. ANNELIDA. Hard shelly tubes of sea-worms. Cornulites serpularius, Schl. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 10, fig. 2, pl. 16, figs. 310), Spirorbis Lewisii, Sow. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 16, fig. 2), like the little sessile Serpulz on sea- weeds. CRUSTACEA Trilobita. Homalonotus cylindricus, Salter, Mon. Brit. Tril. p. 116, fig. 27, pl. 11, fig. 12. Phacops Downingie# (Siluria, 2nd ed, pl. 18, fig. 5). Phacops ib. var. cuneatus, Salter (Mon. Brit, Tril. 1864, p. 28, fig.8). | Phacops caudatus var. corrugatus, Salter, ined. Phacops Stokesii, Milne Edwards (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 10, fig. 6). Acidaspis Hughesii, n.s. Salter. A new species. PHYLLOPODA. Peltocaris anatina, n.s., Salter. A bivalve phyllopod, more cha- racteristic of Cambrian rocks. The semioval rostrum is seldom found. MOLLUSCA BRACHIOPODA. Discina Forbesii, Davids. (Siluria, 2nd ed. foss. 57, fig. 11. Orbicu- loidea, ibid. 3rd ed. p. 226.) Wales and Shropshire. b.570, W.L. Little- hope, Woolhope. a. 237 (figured spe- cimen). Littlehope, Woolhope. a, 458, D.G. Moel Seisiog, Llanrwst. a. 461, W. L. Little- hope. Westmorland and S. of Scotland. b. 571, C. F. Casterton Fell; Helmside. b572, CE. Half a mile N. of Ulverston. b.573, C.G. Casterton Low Fell, Kirkby Lonsdale. b. 574, C.F. Rebecca Hill, Ulverston. b. 576, C. G. Middle- ton Fell, Kirkby Lonsdale, 94 SILURIAN. Case and Column of ‘ * Drawers. |Synopsis : and Figures of Gener: Reference to McCoy's a. Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. GaQ Ga9 Ga8s Ga Spirigerina, p. 197. p. 198. Spirifera cyrtena, p. 193. Hemithyris, p. 201. Spirifera percrassa, LLP Hemythyris crispata, p. 200. Hemithyris, p. 201. (On tablet with Myti- lus? unguiculatus.) Hemithyris, p. 204. Hemithyris, p. 203. Hemithyris crispata, Atrypa marginalis, Dalm. (Dav. Sil. Brach. t. 15, figs. 1, 2). Atrypa reticularis, Linn. (Dav. Sil. Brach. t. 14). Spirifer cyrtena, var. plicatellus, Linn.? (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 9, fig. 25). Athyris (like A. depressa, Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 22, fig. 17). Meristella didyma, Dalm. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 22, fig. 15). Meristella, a small species. Meristella? crassa? Sow. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 9, figs. 6—S). Retzia Barrandii, Davids. Mon. Sil. Brach. t. 13, figs. 10—13. Stricklandii, var. Rhynchonella crispata (Dav. Sil. Br.t. 21, fig. 28). Rhynchonella diodonta, Dalm. Da- vids. Sil. Br. pl. 21, figs. 21—23. Rhynchonella 10-plicata, Sow. (Si- luria, 2nd ed. pl. 9, fig. 15). Rhynchonella nucula, Sow. (Siluria, 3rd ed. pl. 9, fig. 9). Rhynchonella (Lewisii?), Davids. (Siluria, 3rd ed. foss. 58, figs. 1, 2). Rhynchonella, a large species like Strickland, Wales and Shropshire. b. 590, W. L. Wor- cester Beacon. b.591, W. L, Little- hope, Woolhope. baosieeD:G. Plas Madoc, N. of Llan- rwst. b. 586, D.G. N. of Llanrwst. b. 579, W.L. Old Radnor road. a, 240, D.G. Moel Seisiog. b. 577, W. L. Wor- cester Beacon. Old Radnor. a. 456, D. G. Plas Madoc, N. of Llan- rwst. a. 238, Old Radnor. Westmorland and 8S. of Scotland. b. 578, C. G. Middle- ton. b. 583, D. F. Balmae shore. b. 585, D. F. Balmae shore. b. 587, C.G. Middle- ton Fell. Column of|_ Reference to MoCor's Drawers, |Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. LOWER WENLOCK GROUP. Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. P. microcamerus, p. 210. p. 216. Ga‘ Ga6é Ga6 | Lept. alternata, p. 233. Ga6 | S. compressa, p. 242. GaQ | [As S. euglypha, p. 243.] GaQ9 Leptagonia depressa, p- 248. Ga6é L. tenuissimestriata, p. 239. Ga Leptena, p. 235. Gai Ga Rhynchonella, large species. Pentamerus rotundus, Sow. (Dav. Sil. Brach. t. 15, figs. 9—12). Pentamerus liratus, Sow. (Strick- landinia, Davidson, Mon. Sil. Brach, 1864, pl. 20). Orthis elegantula, Dalm. Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 20, fig. 12. Orthis, sp. flat. Orthis, new sp. like biloba, but larger. Orthis, sp.? like O. protensa, Sow. Strophomena, sp. Strophomena, sp. fine lines, Strophomena ouralensis, De Vern. (Leptena, Geol. Russ. Vol. IL p. 220, t. 14, fig. 1). Strophomena depressa, Sow. (Silu- ria, 3rd ed. pl. 20, fig. 20). Leptena transversalis, Dalm. (See Wenlock). Chonetes levigata, Sow. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 20, fig. 15). Chonetes minima, Sow. (Siluria, pl. 20, fig. 16). Wales and Shropshire. b. 592, D. G. Moel Seisiog ; b. 593, Plas Madoc. b. 594, D. G. Plas Madoc. b. 596, D. G. Moel Seisiog. b. 597, W. L. Little- hope; b. 598, Old Radnor road to Pres- telon. b. 602, W. L. Little- hope, Woolhope. b. 599, D. G. Moel Seisiog. b. 600, Gwyddelwern ; b. 603, D. G. Devil’s Bridge*. b. 601, D.G. Gwydd- elwern, Derwen. * Probably Deyil’s Bridge is but a doubtful locality for Denbigh Grits. Westmorland and 8. of Scotland. b. 589, C.F. Rebecca Hill, Ulverston. b. 582, C. F. Rebecca Hill, Ulverston (Mar- tin). a. 378, D. F. Balmae shore. b. 595, C. F. Rebecca Hill, near Ulverston. a. 462, D. F. Balmae shore, Kireudbright. 96 SILURIAN. Seaaee Reference to McCor's Names and References; Observations, &c. Drawers. |Synopsis : and Figures of Genera. LAMELLIBRANCHIATA. Ga p. 265 Mytilus? wunguiculatus (Salter, (Mem. Geol. Surv. 11. p. 365, pl. 20, fig. 6). A doubtful Mytilus, but near that genus. Ga6| PL1X, fig. 6, p. 286. Gaé6 Sanguinolites, Pl 141, fig. 24, p. 277. Ga | Pl. 1K, figs. 2, 3, p. 283. Gaé Ga Nucula levata, Pl. 1 K, figs. 4, 5, p. 285. Gaé6 Ga p. 282 Gaé Ga8 | Sanguinolites inornatus, p- 277. Ga | PL 1K, figs. 7, 8, p. 273. Ga6 Pl. 11, fig. 3, p. 263. Ga Pl. 11, fig. 4, p. 263. Ga8 Nuculites post-striatus, Emmons, Pal. New York, t. 34, fig. 10. Orthonotus decipiens, McCoy, sp. (Arca) Palearca? Edmondiiformis, McCoy. A small obtusely subqua- drate shell (not Arca). Ctenodonta anglica, D’Orb. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 23, fig. 10). Ctenodonta, sp. Cardiola interrupta, Broderip (Sil. 2nd ed. pl. 23, fig. 12). Orthonota, sp. Clidophorus ovalis, McCoy. Pterinea, Goldfuss, comprehends most of the Avicule of Silurian rocks, Pterinea subfalcata, McCoy. Pterinea tenuistriata, McCoy. A very common and characteristic species of the Coniston grits. Numbers and Localities. Wales and Shropshire. a. 456, D.G. Plas Madoc. b. 607, D. F. Gwydd- elwern, Derwen (as Caradoc). a. 455, D.G. Moel Seisiog; b. 608, D.F. near Llangynyw. Near Llangynyw ; a. 457, D.G. Plas Madoe. b. 609, Llangynyw Rectory. b.611, D. F. Cefn ddu. ai, Hil IDE(GE Jeb Madoc. Westmorland and S. of Scotland. a. 916, D.F. Balmae. C. F. Helms Knot, Dent. b. 612, C. F. Helms Side; b. 613, Trout- beck, Windermere ; b. 614, C.G. Middle- ton Fell, near Kirk- by Lonsdale, N. end. b. 615, D. F. Balmae shore. ; b. 616, C. G. Howgill Fell, near Sedbergh. b. 617, C. G. Above Ravenstonedale; b. 618, Middleton Fell, Karkby Lonsdale; b. 619,C.F. Helms Side. Case and Reference to McCoy's Column of Drawers. LOWER WENLOCK GROUP. Numbers and Localities. Names and References; Observations, &c. 97 Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Gad Gald Ga p- 303. GaQ | PL1Xk, fig. 40, p. 296. p. 311. Gal0| Pl.11, fig. 25, p. 311. Ga p. 317. Gal0 Ga8 Ga p. 316. GASTEROPODA. Pleurotomaria (or Trochonema ?) Two species large, turbinate. Hormotoma (Murchisonia), sp. Very slender whorls. Holopella gregaria, Sow. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 34, fig. 10 a). Trochus? cxlatulus, McCoy, proba- bly a Cyclonema. There are no species of true Zrochus in Palwo- zoic rocks. HETEROPODA. Bellerophon trilobatus, Sow. (Silu- ria, 2nd ed. pl. 34, fig. 9). The common Bellerophon of sandy deposits in Silurian rocks: but chiefly common in Upper Ludlow rock. Bellerophon subdecussatus, McCoy. A pretty subglobate species, re- minding us of Carboniferous forms. CEPHALOPODA. Orthoceras subundulatum, Portl. (Si- luria, 3rd ed. Foss. 62, fig. 3). Orthoceras primevum, Forbes sp. (Siluria, 3rd ed. Foss. 62, fig. 4). Wales and Shropshire. a, 610, W. L. Little- hope. b. 620, D. G. Plas Madoc. a. 460, W.L. Old Radnor road. D.G. Plas Madoe, and other localities near Llanrwst. a. 612, D.F. Llan- rwst, Denbighshire. b. 540, D. G. Moel Seisiog ; D. F. Craig ddu allt. b. 544, D. F. Cefn ddu. Westmorland and S. of Scotland. a. 610, D. F. Balmae shore. b. 541, C.G. Helms Knot; b.541*, How- gill Fell near Sed- bergh. b. 542, C. F. Road from Coniston to Hawkshead ; b.542*, Cold Well, near the Castle; b. 543, Hor- ton Dry Ridge. b. 544*, C. F. Hor- ton Dry Ridge. 18 98 SILURIAN. Case and Column of = F Drawers. |Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Reference to McCoy’s Gal0 Gald Ga8s Gal0 Ga8 Gal0 Ga Gal0 Gal0 Gald p. 318. p. 313. p. 815. p. 314. p. 321. p. 319. Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Orthoceras ventricosum, Sharpe (Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. 2, pl. 13, f. 3). [These last two slight thin shells were regarded by Prof. Forbes as species of Pteropoda (Cresevs), the septa are very seldom visible, being easily crushed. ] Orthoceras angulatum, Wahl. (Si- luria, 2nd ed. pl. 28, fig. 4). Orthoceras, sp. Orthoceras subannulatum, Miinst. Beitriige zur Petref. p. 99, t. 19, fig. 3. Orthoceras, sp. Orthoceras tenuicinctum, Portlock (Siluria, 3rd ed. Foss. 42, fig. 3). Orthoceras laqueatum, Hall? (Pal. New York, t. 56, fig. 1, p. 206). Orthoceras dimidiatum, Sow. (Si- luria, 2nd ed. pl. 28, fig. 5). Orthoceras (sp. smooth). Orthoceras tracheale, Sow. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 34, fig. 6). Orthoceras annulatum, Sow. (Silu- ria, 2nd ed. pl. 26, figs. 1, 2). Trochoceras, sp. Very ill preserved and filled with spar. Wales and Shropshire. b. 543*, D. F. Pen- y-Big, Bron Einion. b. 545, D. F. Corwen Saw Mills; b. 545*, Llangynyw Rectory. b. 540*, D. F. Llan- gynyw Rectory. b: 539%, W. 1. Old Radnor to Presteign. Westmorland and S. of Scotland. b. 537, C.G. N. end of Middleton Fell, Kirkby Lonsdale. b. 546, C. F. Road from Coniston to Hawkshead. b. 546*, C. G. Helm- side. b. 537*, C.F. Rebec- ca Hill, Ulverston. b. 536, C. F. Road from Coniston to Hawkshead ; b.536*, Helmside. b. 547, C.F. Road from Coniston to Hawkshead. b. 547*, C. F. Helms Knot, Dent. b. 532, C.F. Dry Ridge, Horton. b. 532, C.G. Howgill Fell near Sedbergh. b. 559, C.F. Dry Ridge, Horton in Ribblesdale. WENLOCK GROUP. 99 WENLOCK LIMESTONE AND SHALE. It is not advisable to keep these separate, for in the Eastern Counties the limestone often dies away to a mere trace, and in 8. Wales it is rarely to be seen at all. In North Wales and Westmorland the Wenlock formation is chiefly mud, slate, or shale. In §S. Wales shale and sandstone, more frequently a clayey sandstone. The fossils consequently vary much in different localities, the more sandy strata often containing species which in Shropshire are confined to sandy beds in the Ludlow rock. F.C. Fletcher Collection, part of which is & a separate cabinet F. C. Case and , ian Column of RAGSRGO 2) Lott Names and References ; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Drawers. | Synopsis: and Figures of Genera, Plante vere. Most of the species known as Fucoids (i.e. seaweeds, fossil) are nothing more than the filled-up burrows of worms, &c, Chondrites, Brongn. A genus intended to in- clude many different forms. Chondrites verisimilis, Salter (Expl. Edinb. | a 317, Dudley, F.C. Memoir, Geol. Surv. p. 134, pl. 11, fig.1). A true sea-weed, like Fucus cartilagineus. FC AMORPHOZOA (Sponges). Sponges. Stromatopora, Coscinopora, Cnemidium, Ver- ticillopora, Stellispongia, &c. are examples of very solid caleareous sponges. Ischadites, Spherospongia, Amphispongia, and other Silurian forms are supposed to be distantly allied to the living Grantia. Gb10 p. 12. Stromatopora striatella, D’Orb. (Siluria, 2nd | a. 683, a. 684, Wenlock ; FC ed. Foss. 51, pl. 41, fig. 31). iS. Concentrica, | b. 655, Dudley, F. C.; Lonsdale, Sil. Sys. t. 15, fig. 31 (not of Gold- | a. 684, good polished sec- fuss). tion. Cnemidium tenue, Lonsd. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. | a. 318, Dudley, F. C. 38, fig. 11). An obscure genus of calcareous sponges with minute oscula. Such sponges, and such as the following species :— Verticillopora abnormis, Lonsd. (Siluria, 2nd | Dudley, F. C. ed. Pl. 38, fig. 10), are common in the Wenlock Limestone here and there. (Fistulipora, McCoy. See Corals. I doubt if this be more than a sponge. J. W.S.) 13—2 100 Case and Column of Drawers. Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. SILURIAN. Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. FC Fe rap Ce) Bryozou, FC Ischadites Keenigii, Murch. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 12, fig. 4). There is no doubt this is one of the regular sponges like Sphwrospongia (p. 40). It has a root, and foramen at top, after the manner of Grantia (Bow.). Sponge, new. Palmate lobed. Sponge, cylindrical, vermiform, acrogenous in growth. This is quite new in Silurian rocks, and should be figured. Some of these are doubtful, and are not cata- logued by Prof. McCoy. Chiefly from Count Miinster’s collection, as Cellepora, &e. BRYOZOA or POLYZOA. Low polypoid Mollusca (lace corals, Flustra, &e.) abound on every quiet sea bottom. New form like Archimedea of the M. Lime- stone of America. Bryozoa, sp. 1. Cells oblong, granular between. Bryozoa, sp.2. Thick branches, cells perma- nent. Bryozoa, sp. 3. Encrusting on Favosites, gra- nules very prominent. Trematopora (Hall), sp. Branched cells in linear row.. See Pal. N. York, Vol. 11. p. 149. | Discopora? Rising over Syringopora. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 41). Ceriopora? Branched species (like Hornera in aspect). This may possibly be a coral allied to Cenites. Fenestella infundibulum, (etepora, Lonsdale, Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 41, fig. 24). a. 33, Dudley (shale) F.C.; a 32, Malvern (shale) F.C. a. 319, Dudley, F.C. a. 320, Dudley, F.C. a. 321, Dudley, F.C. a. 310, Dudley, F.C. a. 309, Dudley, F.C. a, 322, Dudley, F. C. a. 323, Dudley, F.C. a. 885, Dudley, F.C. a. 884, Dudley, F. C. b. 656, Dudley, F.C. Gast and Reference to McCoy’s Drawers. | Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. FC p. 49. Gb FC 16, fig. 19, p. 50. FC 1 ©, fig. 20, p. 50. p. 50. FC Gb2 FC FC FC FC p. 49. Gb2 x FC WENLOCK GROUP. 101 Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Fenestella Milleri, Lonsdale (Siluria, 3rd ed. Foss. 50, fig. 4, pl. 41, fig. 17). The old state is very rare indeed. Fenestella rigidula, McCoy. F. elegans, Hall. Pal. N. York, Vol. 11. pl. 40, fig. 1. The branches are ridged sharply: very parallel pores three between each bar. Fenestella patula, McCoy. More open meshes and more sinuous branches than last. Fenestella subantiqua, D’Orb. (Siluria, 3rd ed. pl. 41, fig. 16; Foss. 30, fig. 1). Fenestella, sp. 1. Coarse and very irregular branches. Fenestella, sp. 2. Somewhat more funnel- shaped, and with prominent pores, two be- tween each interstice. Fenestella, sp. 3. Allied to &. infundibulum. Fenestella assimilis, Lonsd. Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 41, fig. 27; Foss. 49, fig. 2. Dictyonema retiformis, Hall (Pal. N. York, 2, t. 40. A horny form of the Retepora Group (not the same as Cambrian Fossil. J. W.S.). Glauconome disticha, Goldf. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 41, fig. 12; Foss. 49, fig. 5). This seems to be everywhere characteristic of the Wen- lock Limestone. A central stem and short lateral branches to each frond, and the fronds grow in clusters from one root like a herring-bone. Glauconome, sp.? With obliquely set branches, otherwise the same as the last. a. 327*, Dudley, F.C. old state. a. 326*, Dudley, F.C. in large quantity. a. 325*, Dudley, F.C. Dudley, F.C. a. 325, Dudley, F.C. a. 326, Dudley, F.C. Dudley, F.C. b. 657, Dudley, F.C. a. 327, Dudley, F.C. a. 393*, Dudley. a. 393, Dudley, F. C. 102 Case and Column of Drawers. FC Gb9 FC Gbi Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. p. 47. G. ludensis, p. 4. SILURIAN. Names and References; Observations, &c. Ptilodictya, Goldf. Petref. Germanica. Flat plates, with the cells very regularly ar- ranged on both sides of them. The species are often branched, once or twice, but al- ways in one plane. The genus is world-wide in Cambrian and Silurian, and very nume- rous in species. Ptilodictya lanceolata, Goldf. (Pet. Ger. t. 37, fig. 2) Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 49, fig. 6, pl. 41, fig. 11. Often attains great size, ten inches; easily breaks along the centre plate. Ptilodictya scalpellum, Lonsd. (Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 50, pl. 41, fig. 25). Slightly branched only: but leading away from the compound branched and explanate species of the Cam- brian to the simple P. lanceolata. Such spe- cies as the present would be included in Prof. Hall’s unnecessary genus Stictopora. Polypora or Hornera crassa, Lonsd. (Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 49, fig. 1, pl. 41, fig. 13). Hor- nera only differs from Polypora (Devonian and Carboniferous) by wanting the connect- ing bars. HYDROZOA? or POLYZOA. The Graptolites are (I think not rightly) gene- rally now referred to the Hydroid Polypes. I prefer the analogy with such Bryozoa as Defrancia. Graptolites priodon, Bronn (G. ludensis) (Si- luria, 2nd ed. pl. 12, fig. 1, Foss. 11, fig. 3). See remarks on this common Northern fossil in the Cambrian lists. It is extremely com- mon at the base of the Wenlock in France and Bohemia. Numbers and Localities. Aymestry (Haven), b. 658, Dudley, F. C.; b. 661, Led- bury. b. 659, Dudley, F. C. b. 660, Dudley, F.C. a. 468, S. of the Dee, Llan- gollen; b. 662, Smithfield ; b. 663, Cwmbach, Builth; also b. 664, bed of Wye, Builth; b. 665, Cwm, W. of Cefn Grugos, Llanfyllin ; b. 666, Llanfair; b. 667, Ffyrnwy, Montgomery- shire, Case and Column of Drawers. Gb2 Gb10 Gb3 FC FC Gb3 FC Reference to McCov’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. WENLOCK GROUP. Names and References; Observations, &c. 103 Numbers and Localities. Star corals, Millepores, &c. (True Corals). with stony bases to cells. 7 dil Paleopora, McCoy. p. 14. Paleopora, p. 15. P. subtubulata, p. 16? Pl. 16, fig. 4 Palewopora, p. 16. Paleopora, p. 17. Graptolites, sp. With simple not recurved cell- mouths. Very common. It is possibly G. colonus, Barrande, in Lower Ludlow, but more likely distinct. ZOOPHYTA (CELENTERATA, Huxley). Tabulata, or Millepore Corals. Fistulipora decipiens, McCoy (Ann. Mag. N, Hist. 2nd Ser. Vol. vi. p. 285). The cell tubes are so minute, and the interstitial sub- stance too like a sponge. Heliolites, Dana. A common Wenlock fossil. Millepore corals allied closely to the Helio- pora cerulea of V. D. Land. Cell tubes set in a mass of cenenchyma, i.e. pointed small tubes of much less diameter than the cells. Species numerous. Heliolites interstincta, Wahl. (Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 18, figs. 3—5, pl. 39, fig. 2. Milne Edw. t. 57, fig. 9). Incrusting on shells (Or- thoceras, or spiral shells chiefly) or amor- phous or pyriform when grown in rapidly accumulating mud. In fact, it assumes all shapes, like a Proteus, according to circum- stances, and ranges from Middle Cambrian to Ludlow rock. Heliolites, var. Murchisoni, Milne Edw. Brit. Foss. Cor. tab. 57, fig. 6. Heliolites megastoma, McCoy (Sil. Foss. Irel. pl. 4, fig. 14). Siluria, 2nd ed. 1859, wood- cut 27, fig. 7. Easily known from the last (not so common) by the very large close set cups. (Milne Edw. t. 58, fig. 2). Heliolites petalliformis, Lonsd. (Plasmopora, Milne Edw. Brit. Foss. Cor. p. 253, pl. 59, fig.1. Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 18, fig. 2, pl. 39, fig. 4). Regarded as a distinct genus (Plas- mopora) by Milne Edw. The distinctions seem too minute to be more than specific. Wenlock shale? b. 668, Dudley, F.C. Itis possible this comes from the Lower Ludlow shale, above the workable limestones. The species abounds near Lud- low. b. 671, Wenlock Ridge, Woolhope; b. 673, Mal- vern; b. 674, Aymestry ; b. 675, Dudley, F. C.; b. 675*, Dudley, var. F.C. b. 672, Walsall, var. F. C. b. 676, Dudley, F. C. b. 677, Wenlock Ridge, Woolhope ; b. 678, Dudley, F.C. b. 680, Dudley, F.C. Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. SILURIAN. Names and References; Observations, &c. Paleopora, p. 18. p. 19. Heliolites, var. With depressed areas at the cell mouths. Heliolites tubulata, Lonsd. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 39, fig. 3), and Foss. 18, fig. 1. Heliolites Grayi, Milne Edw. (Brit. Foss. Cor. p. 252, t. 58, fig. 1, Archiv. Mus. v. p. 217). Flat branches; crateriform cells, raised edges. Heliolites, var. ? Heliolites ceespitosa, n.s. Salter. Something like H. Grayt, but cells approximate ; shal- low pits, not raised. Heliolites, sp. With sunk pores. Favosites (Calamopora, Goldfuss). A genus of Silurian and Devonian corals—more abundant here than any other. ‘The cells are thickly pierced with little round holes (foramina) often in two rows, but some- times more, by which a communication is kept up between neighbour corallites. Close- set tabule fill up the hexagonal tubes, and there are scarcely visible septa. Favosites, sp. Shewing the upper crowded tabulee. Favosites alveolaris, Goldf. (Petref. G. t. 26, fig. 1; Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 17, fig. 4). [I do not know how externally to distinguish this species from £. gothlandica, and I be- lieve the F. alveolaris, with large serrated angles to the tubes, to be very common in our Wenlock Rocks.] Favosites Gothlandica, Linn. (Goldf. Pet. Germ. t. 26, fig. 3; Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 17, figs. 2, 3, pl. 40, figs. 3, 4, Foss. 29, fig. 6). One of the most beautiful of fossils. The honey- comb cells when perfect are radiated by six obtuse folds which represent septa. The sides of the tubes are pierced by a regular double row of holes, except in the next var. Numbers and Localities. b. 681, Dudley, F. C. b. 682, Dudley, F. C.; b. 683, Wenlock; b. 684, Aymestry; b. 685, Wool- hope. a. 342, Dudley, F.C. a, 343, Dudley, F.C. a. 376, Dudley, F. C. a, 369, Dudley. b. 685, Wenlock Ridge, Woolhope ; b. 686, Dudley. b. 687, Ledbury; Wool- hope; a. 675, a. 676, Wen- lock, tubes well-shewn ; b. 688, Dudley. WENLOCK GROUP. Case and Column of Drawers. Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Names and References; Observations, &c. Gb4 FC Gb Gb FC p. 20. Gb4 Gb4 FC Gb4 Favosites, id. var. basaltica, Goldf. (ib. pl. 26, fig. 4), which has only a single row of fora- mina. In all the varieties (and I suspect the following species is only the young state) the angles of the tubes are smooth. Favosites Forbesii, Milne Edw. (Brit. Foss, Cor. t. 60, fig. 2, p. 258). Distinguished from Fav. Gothlandica, of which probably it is the young. Favosites favosa, Goldf. sp.? (Petref. Germ. t. 26, fig. 2). Only one specimen. The walls very thick and cells very large. Favosites aspera, D’Orb. (Milne Edw. and Haime, Brit. Foss. Cor. t. 60, fig, 3, Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 40, figs. 1, 2). | Favosites Hisingeri, Milne Edw. (Brit. Foss. Cor. t. 61, fig. 1, p. 259). Iam not sure of this species : nor is any one else. It is probably a state of J aspera, and both are probably varieties of #'. multipora, Lonsdale, a species supposed to havemany rows of pores: but cer- tainly it has not—the pores are few. [J.W.S.] Favosites cristata, Blumenbach (Milne Edw. and Haime, t. 61, fig. 3; Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 17, fig. 1, pl. 41, fig. 2). It is very variable in shape and size of cells, and is much like #. polymorpha, the Devonian species. But it has greatly thicker walls to the cells: one species was referred to Ff. polymorpha formerly. Cenites, Eichwald (Zimaria, Londs.). Branch- ed, or lobed, like Favosites, but with thick walls not perforated—or not known to be so —and with oblique mouths, which are much thickened so as to leave but a slit or trian- gular opening. 105 Numbers and Localities, b. 689, Dudley, labelled by Count Miinster as Calamo- pora basaltica. a, 681, Dudley, F. C., a. 400, F.C., a. 682, F.C, shews tubes inside full of gra- nules: these are not the foramina, though often mistaken for them. a. 464, Whitfield, worth (Earl Ducie). Tort- a.680, Dudley, F.C., young growths on good upper surface; a. 679, good, Dud- ley, F.C.; Wenlock; Ay- mestry; Malvern; a. 368, Whitfield, Tortworth (Earl Ducie). b. 690, Woolhope hills. a. 398, Dudley. a. 398*, Wenlock; a. 399, Dudley, F.C, both varieties, branches narrow and large, and small and large-celled forms. 14 106 SILURIAN. Occa- Closer mouths, and This character in eeeiane Reference to McCoy’s Column of ie Names and References; Observations, &c. Drawers. Synopsis : and Figures of Genera. Gb5 p. 22. Cenites intertextus, Hichwald (Milne Edw. t. FC 65, fig.5. Limaria fruticosa, Sil. Syst. Ca- nites, Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 38, fig. 8). Gb5 Pl. 1 ©, fig. 8, p. 22. Cenites strigatus, McCoy. Distinguished by Prof. McCoy by the scratch-like channels of the worn cell-mouths, but probably C. in- tertextus. Gb5 Cenites juniperinus, Hichw. (Milne Edw. t. 65, FC fig. 4. Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 19, fig. 3. Limaria clathrata, pl. 38, fig. 7). FC Cceenites labrosus, Milne Edw. t. 65, fig. 6, p. 277. A wide flat-lobed species with short mouths to the cells, with projecting lips or edges. The mouths rather open. sionally the projection is small. FC Cenites linearis, Milne Edw. (t. 65, fig. 3, p. 277). Like the last, but with linear mouths on the projecting bosses. FC Cenites, sp. 1. Like linearis, but with no depth of mouth. Cell-openings curved, shal- low, but very low set. FC Cenites juniperinus, var. somewhat longer. FC Cosnites, sp.2. Allied var. to linearis, but with crested-edged mouths. extreme, as in sp. 1. The extreme of smooth- ness is gained. FC Ceenites, sp. (a var. of C. labrosus). With no p. 68. projections to support the mouth. Alveolites, Lonsd. The mouths of the cells are oblique or rhomboidal, but not thickened, and there is generally a thickened ridge or tooth on one side; tabule imperfect; septa none, unless the ridge above named be one, Range—Silurian to Carboniferous. Numbers and Localities. b. 691, Sedgley? Aymestry; a. 300*, Dudley, F. C. b. 692, Dudley. b. 693, Dudley, F.C.; a. 299, Dudley, F.C. Dudley, F.C. Dudley, F.C. a. 301, Dudley, F. C. Dudley, F.C. a. 300, Dudley, F.C. Dudley, F. C. Case and Column of Drawers. Gb4 FC Gb4 FC Gb7 Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis : and Figures of Genera, Favosites oculata, p. 21. p. 26. WENLOCK GROUP. 107 Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. A. Branched Species (Cladopora, Hall). Alveolites repens, Linn. (Milne Edw. t. 62, fig. 1, p. 263. Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 17, fig. 6). Favosites oculata, Goldfuss (Petref. Germ. t. 65, fig. 14), according to McCoy. Alveolites Fletcheri (Seeley MSS), allied to A. repens. ‘The branches frequently connate and lobed. Narrow branches: small cell- mouths. Alveolites seriatoporoides, Milne Edw. (Brit. Foss. Cor. t. 62, fig. 2, p. 263). B. Amorphous or round forms. Alveolites Labechii, Lonsd. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 40, fig. 8. Foss. 17, fig. 5). The sp. oc- curs in various forms, flattened, round, or irregularly expanded. Alveolites Seeleyi, Salter, n. sp. Branches coa- lesced, cells small. Distinguished by the acumen of Mr Seeley. Stenopora, Lonsd. The genus is a little doubt- ful: it depends upon the contraction of the mouth of the cells, and on the irregular tabule. The species are not easily distin- guished from Chetetes or Monticulipora. Stenopora fibrosa, Goldf. (Pet. Germ. t. 28, fig. 3). Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 17, fig. 7, Foss. 30, figs. 1, 2, pl. 40, figs. 6, 7. Easily distin- guished from Monticulipora by the struc- ture of tubes. Stenopora granulosa, Goldf. (Ceriopora). Is a Chetetes. See that genus. b. 694, Wenlock; a. 397, Dudley, F.C.; a. 367, Dud- ley, F.C., a choice specimen shewing various states of the surface. a. 394, Dudley, F. C. b.695, Dormington; b. 696, Wenlock Edge; a. 398, Dudley, F.C. b. 697, Woolhope quarries; one specimen is figured by M. Edwards, a. 396, as Won- ticulipora Bowerbankii. a. 365, Dudley, F.C. Falfield or Whitfield, Tort- worth (Earl Ducie) ; b. 698, Tottlebank, near Ulver- ston; a. 377, Dudley, F. C.; a. 891, Dudley, Miinster Coll. 14—2 108 Case and Reference to McCoy's Column of Drawers. Synopsis : and Figures of Genera. SILURIAN. Names and References ; Observations, &c. FC FC Gbd FC FC FC Gb5 Numbers and Localities. Chetetes Fischer. A genus of Tabulata which is very like Stenopora, and Monticulipora especially, but has not the clustered fertile pores of the last. Tubes increase not by lateral gemmation, but by fission of tubes, which are inseparably united; hence in splitting, the interiors (not the walls) shew. No foramina on the walls. Chetetes, sp. With long, narrow, linear branches, very variable in diameter and length. Chetetes, sp. Several other species remain to be described. Some may be Monticulipora (most probably are so). Nebulipora, McCoy. Monticulipora, Milne Edwards. Amorphous or branched corals, or even encrusting, with clustered cells (fer- tile) of larger size than the ordinary barren ones—and these fertile cells frequently on prominences. 1. Branched species. Monticulipora Fletcheri, Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 40, fig. 9. M. Edwards (t. 62, fig. 3). Walls thick, cells prominent, pores (interstitial) minute, evidently the young state of Pul- chellus. Monticulipora pulchella, M. Edwards (t. 62, fig. 5), p. 267, rather coarse pores (promi- nent edges), but not angular pores. Monticulipora, sp. 1. Thick branches, rather small. Angular cells, very distinct clus- ters. a. 401, Dudley, F.C. Dudley, F.C. Dudley, F.C. a. 366*, Dudley, F.C. a. 402, Dudley, F. C. (fig. specimen). a. 305, Dudley, F. C., com- mon. Case and Column of Drawers. FC Gb6 Gb5 FC FC FC FC FC FC FC Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. WENLOCK GROUP. Names and References; Observations, &c. Pl. 1 ©, fig. 5, p. 24. For figures of the genera of Corals see Milne Edwards’ excellent work, British Fossil Corals (Palzonto- graphical Society). Monticulipora Bowerbankii, Milne Edwards (t. 63, fig. 1), p. 268. Coarse angular pores, and not very distinct or separate clusters, often much branched. Nebulipora Bower- bankii, Siluria, Appendix, 534, Monticulipora, sp. Smaller cells, and of more globular form than MZ. Bowerbanki. 2. Panpillate species. Incrusting or expanded. ip P s P Monticulipora papillata, McCoy (M. Edw. t. 62, fig. 4). True sp. of McCoy. Small angular cells, sharp prominent bosses, (Incrusting.) Monticulipora, sp. 2. Like papillata, but larger cells, and solid, scarcely raised papillee. (Incrusting. ) Monticulipora, sp. 3. Cells minute, but pro- minent, (thick walls), papilla solid. [Ex- panded 2 or 3 inches. ] 3. Lenticular masses. Monticulipora poculum, Salter, MSS. Monticulipora, sp. 4. Cup-shaped base, upper surface therefore hollow, and sometimes nearly flat, with angular cells. But this is an unusual form in the genus. Sometimes the species is flatter. Monticulipora, sp. 5. Gibbous, cells large, an- gular; the fertile cells scarcely larger than the rest, in small few-celled clusters. Monticulipora, sp. 6. Like last, but much thicker walls and smaller cells, which are round not angular. Labechia, Milne Edwards and Haime, Flat expanded corals, very unlike the usual tabulated forms, except Thecia. The sur- face is covered with elevated papille. 109 Numbers and Localities. a, 306, Dudley, F.C. is the figured (1 b.) species of Edwards. Wenlock Edge, Wool- hope. a. 308, Whitfield (Earl Ducie), a. 311, Dudley, F.C. a, 312, Dudley, F. C. a, 313, Dudley, F.C. a. 314, Dudley, F. C. a. 315, Dudley, F.C. ro) . 316, Dudley, F.C. a. 317, Dudley, F: C. 110 Case and Column of Drawers. Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. FC Gb6 Gb2 c2 by ao Q FC FC FC Gh2 Palwopora, p. 14. p. 26. SILURIAN. Names and References; Observations, &c. Labechia conferta, Lonsdale (Milne Edwards, Brit. Foss. Cor. p. 269), Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 39, fig. 5. Labechia sp. Or var. of the above. Thecia, Milne Edwards. An expanded coral like Labechia, with cell-mouths, almost closed by the thick sector, which all but fills up the tube. In this respect it resem- bles the modern star-corals, and perhaps indicates a passage to them. The section is very solid, only two species are certainly known, One is common in our Wenlock rocks, Thecia Swindernana, Goldfuss. (Pet. Germ. pl. 38, fig. 3, Milne Edwards, t. 65, fig. 7). Variable in the size of cells. Thecia (Porites) expatiata, Lonsd. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 41, fig. 3). Thecia Grayana, (Milne Edwards, t. 65, fig. 8), with fewer septa. Thecia, species probably new. This form— separated by Mr Seeley in 1865, as pro- bably distinct—seems to differ chiefly in the crowded? calices, and the consequent depth of the cups. Thecia Grayana, var.? Lobed, almost palmate. Tabulate coral, with linear connecting ridges, ? genus. Halysites (chain coral). It differs from all other tabulate corals by having the calices connected fully by their sides, on two edges only, so as to form linear rows, which inos- culate and form a reticulate pattern. The calices are oval, a rare circumstance, ex- cept in Alveolites before described. A sec- tion shews the tabule very close set; and there are no septa whatever or trace of them. Numbers and Localities. a. 297, Dudley, F.C. ; b. 701, Wenlock Edge, Woolhope. a, 298, Dudley, F. C. b.704, Dudley, F.C.; Wool- hope; b. 703, Wenlock. a. 403, Dudley, F.C. a. 302, Dudley, F.C. a. 303, Dudley, F. C. WENLOCK GROUP. 111 Case and Column of Drawers. FC Gb6 FC FC 19"(0 Gbé6 Ge FC Reference to McCoyv’s Synopsis : and Figures of Genera. p. 27. Cup-corals. Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Halysites catenularius, Linn. (Catenipora es- charoides, Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 40, fig. 14, Goldfuss, Pet. Germ. t. 25, fig. 4). The commonest of common fossils, in every region where Upper Silurian is known. Arctic circle, &e. Halysites, var. labyrinthicus, Goldfuss, is only a variety with very large tubes. Syringopora, Goldfuss. This is perhaps the extreme form which could be taken by Millepores, the tubes or corallites being absolutely separate except at the creeping base. They throw out lateral appendicles which unite and help to support the reti- cular mass. The base is known as Aulopora, Goldfuss. Syringopora fascicularis, Linn. (S. filiformis, Lonsd.? Goldfuss, Pet. t. 38, fig. 6, Milne Edwards, t. 65, fig. 1), the most slender tubed of British Silurian species. Aulopora tubeformis, Lonsd. Sil. Syst. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 40, fig. 12, pl. 41, fig. 8). Syringopora bifurcata, Lonsdale, S. reticulata, Sil. Syst. t. 15 bis, f. 11 (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 40, figs. 10, 11). A very large-tubed species, the largest indeed, and with branches most remote. Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 19, figs. 2, 4, 5. Syringopora serpens, Linn. (M. Edw. t. 65, fig. 2). Aulopora serpens, and conglomerata. Lonsd. Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 41, figs. 6—9. ZOANTHARIA RUGOSA, M. Edwards and Haime. The cup and star-corals of the Silurian rocks are found to have more of the character of the Tabulata than any recent reef-building or cup-corals; and as a very remarkable character, the number of the septa is either four or a multiple of four, a character only found in the Alcyonarian Zoophytes of the present seas (Edwards and Haime). a. 370, Dudley, F.C.; b. 705, Woolhope. a. ddl, Dudley, KIC! a. 352, Dudley, F. C. b. 708, Wenlock Edge, Woolhope; b. 707, Dudley ; a. 353, Dudley, F.C. a, 354, Dudley, F.C. SILURIAN. Names and References; Observations, &c. Aulacophyllum mitratum, Suec. p. 100, Milne Edwards, t. 66, fig. 1). A compressed and very oblique cup. There is some doubt if the large form be not quite distinct from the small one. Cyathophyllum, Goldfuss. The common Pale- ozoic genus of cup-corals. Cyathophyllum Loveni, Milne Edwards (Brit. Foss. Cor. t. 66, fig. 2, p. 280). Cyathophyllum. Large variety, possibly new Cyathophyllum pseudoceratites, McCoy sp. M. Edw. (Brit. Foss. Cor. t. 66, fig. 3). Cyathophyllum angustum, Lonsd. See C. ar- ticulatum, Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 39, fig. 9. Tufted narrow species like Cyathophyllum truncatum, Linn. (Milne Edw. t. 66, fig. 5, Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 39, fig. 12, b, c, d, Cyathophyll. dianthus, Siluria, pl. Easily known by the open flat limb of the cup and the calycular gemmation, 7 or 8 young buds often spring Cyathophyllum articulatum, Wahl. (M. Edw. Brit. Foss. Cor. t. 67, fig. 1, Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 39, fig. 10, C. cespitosum, Sil. Syst. pl. 16, Like the last, but much more Cyathophyllum fiexuosum, Lonsd. (Milne Edw. t. 67, fig. 2. Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 39, fig. 7). Usually a straight slender tube: it is an exception to find it curved as in Lonsdale’s 112 Ace, Reference to McCoy’s Drawers. Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. FC p. 69. Gb‘? FC species. FC Strephodes, Gb8 Pl. 1 8, fig. 20, p. 30. Gb7 Cyathophyllum. C. flecuosum. Gb 8 | Strephodes vermiculoides, p. 31. FC 39, fig. 12). | from one cup. Gb8 Strephodes vermiculoides. FC Pl. 18, fig. 22, p. dll. fig. 10). slender stems. FC figure. Numbers and Localities. Hisinger (Leth. | a. 328, a. 329, Dudley, F.C.; a, 329 is fig. 1, a. 328 1s fig. la in M. Edwards’ Mono- graph; fig. 1 a. is the large form. a. 364, Dudley, F.C. Dudley, F.C. a.333, Dudley, F.C., figured , specimen of M. Edwards; a. 372, Sedgley, McCoy’s figure. a, 362, Dudley, F.C. Lindell’s Quarry, Wool- hope. a. 330, Dudley, F.C.; a. 873, Wenlock. b. 706, Aymestry, McOoy’s figure; a. 331, Dudley, F.C. (large figured specimen, Milne Edwards). near a. 332, Dudley, F. C. WENLOCK GROUP. 113 Case and Column of Drawers. Reference to McCoy's Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. FC Ge FC Gb7 Gbs8 FC Gbé6 Ge FC FC Strephodes, Pl. 1 8, fig. 21, p. 31. Caninia lata, p. 28, Pl.16, fig. 12, and C. turbinata. Names and References; Observations, &c, Cyathophyllum trochiforme, McCoy, distin- guished by the proportions of the lamelle and the cup. Several sp. undescribed of this genus, or rather group of genera, remain in the drawers for future work. Petraia, sp. Probably a Cyathophyllum, as in- dicated by Milne Edwards and Haime, Omphyma, M. Edwards and Haime. A group of large Cyathophyllide, the largest (except Ptychophyllum) known in the Lower Paleo- zoic rocks: the cup is broad, and the septa do not reach the centre, which is occupied by broad flat tabule. The sides filled with the ordinary vesicular tissue. The outer coat (exotheca) generally sends down root- lets for support. Probably there are only two species in Britain. It is common in Sweden. Omphyma turbinata, Linn. (Milne Edwards, t. 69, fig. 1, Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss, 53, figs. 4, 5, pl. 39, fig. 11). The widest form of the genus, but the specimens vary so much, that it is possible the following may be only a variety (C. lata McCoy is certainly So). Omphyma subturbinata, Milne Edwards, t. 68, fig. 1, differs chiefly in its greater length and the consequent narrowness of the cup. Omphyma? Murchisoni, Milne Edwards, t. 67, fig. 8. Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 38, fig. 2. _ Ptychophyllum, Milne Edwards and Haime. A large expanded cup-coral: the limb of the cup is so much turned down, and the columella or central part so much thickened and twisted, that the coral, which has but a very short stem or cup, seems turned inside out. The genus is not confined to Numbers and Localities. a. 360, Dudley, figured specimen, McCoy; a. 334, Dudley, F.C, Dudley, F.C. and Walsall, F.C. Also Woolhope. Falfield, Tortworth (Earl Ducie). a. 674, Dudley, F.C.; b. 711, Ledbury; b. 712, Woolhope © (Dormington) quarries. b. 709, Dudley, F.C. b. 710, Dudley, F. C. 15 114 SILURIAN. Case and | Column of| Drawers. Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. FC Ge Britain. An Arctic form from the northern expeditions is in the cabinet of the Geol. Survey. In this the successive growths of the calyx are so regular, and the limb turned so much back, that the whole re- sembles a Chinese pagoda, whence the name Ptychophyllum pagoda, Salter. Ptychophyllum patellatum, Schloth. (Strom- bodes plicatum, Lonsd., Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 52, fig. 5, pl. 38, fig. 4). Goniophyllum, Milne Edwards and Haime. Square or semi-cylindrical coral-cups, of small size, not above an inch or two in height; with obscure septa, arranged in crucial fashion. The great peculiarity of this fossil (probably the remnant of a large class of extinct forms) seems to be that all its species, of which several have been de- scribed by Lindstrém from Sweden, are furnished with an operculum (a) or ld— and it is difficult to see how the tentacles performed their duty. Calceola, the Devo- nian fossil, hitherto thought a Brachiopod, is of this group. Goniophyllum pyramidale, Hisinger, (Leth. Suec. p. 101. G. Fletcheri, Milne Edwards, t. 68, fig. 3, p. 290; G. Fletcheri, Salter in Siluria, 2nd ed. p. 244). It varies much in shape; the operculum has not been found yet in England, but should be looked for. Compound cup-corals. Only differ from single cups by the aggregate growth of the buds, or young corallites, which do not fall off the parent, but are | attached and grow hexagonal by compres- sion amongst one another. In every Wenlock collec- tion. a. 335, Dudley, F. C.; Mal- vern, Wenlock Shale; b. 713, Dudley (J.Gray, Esq.). WENLOCK GROUP. Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. a ae Reference to McCoy’s Drawers. Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. FC Acervularia ananas, p. 35. Ge p. 37. FO Pl. 1 8, fig. 27, p. 38. Ge Gb7 Gbs Pl. 1B, fig. 28, p. 34. Sarcinula, p. 36. Arachnophyllum luxurians, Edw. and Haime, (Brit. Fos. Cor. t. 69, fig. 2, p. 292. Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 39, fig. 6. A. ananas, Linn. (in part). Lonsdale, Sil. Syst. pl. 16, fig. 6. Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 53, fig. 6). There is no doubt this is the chief coral intended by Linneus, but as he included more than one, the A. ananas was described by Lamarck from the other species. Arachnophyllum, McCoy (Strombodes, Milne Edwards). McCoy's genus was certainly described shortly before or immediately after Milne Edwards’ first description of the ge- nus; and it seems hardly worth while to revive the doubtful genus of Schweigger, and displace a most excellent and graphic name for it. Arachnophyllum typus, McCoy (Milne Ed- wards, t. 71, fig. 1, as Strombodes, Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 52, fig. 6). S. typus, diffluens, Murchisoni, Phillipsi, and Labechii, all are varieties of one common species. [Strombodes Wenlockensis, McCoy, is a Lons- daleia, Edwards, and is a common mountain limestone coral introduced by mistake; it never came from the Wenlock localities, J. W.S. 1867] Syringophyllum, Edwards and Haime (Sar- einula, Linn.in part). The projecting edges of the cups are the inner wall (endotheca), the interstices being filled by the coronate septa, and there are no bounding walls to the separate corallites—they are fused to- gether as in modern reef-corals, Syringophyllum organum, Linn. (Sarcinula, Lonsd. and Goldfuss, Pet. Germ. t. 24, fig. 10). More common in the Lower Silurian rocks. (See Milne Edwards, t. 71, fig. 3, and Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss, 29, fig. 4.) a. 336, Dudley, F. C. is fig. 2a in M. Edwards’ Mono- graph; a. 678 shews the buds well. b. 716, Dormington, Wool- hope; a. 361, near Aymes- try, MéCoy’s figure; a. 363, Dudley, F.C. as Murchisoni. From Shropshire or N, Wales. No specimen; but should be obtained from Dud- ley. 15—2 116 SILURIAN. Case and Column of Drawers. Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Gb8 FC Gb6 Gbé Gb7 FC Pl. 18, fig. 19, p. 82. Vesicular cup-corals. Cystiphyllum, Lonsd. In this cup-coral the septa, though not absent, are quite subor- dinate to the vesicular structure, which takes the place also of the regular tabule, or rather represents them. A fine section to shew structure. Cystiphyllum Grayii, Milne Edwards, t. 72, fig. 3. The original figured specimens are in this collection and are marked. Cystiphyllum brevilamellatum, McCoy. A somewhat doubtful speeies. McCoy seems to think Lonsdale’s pl. 16 bis, fig. 2, Sil. Syst. may be this species. Cystiphyllum cylindricum, Lonsd. (Milne Edw. Brit. Fos. Cor. t. 72, fig. 2, also Siluria, 2nd | ed. pl. 38, fig. 3). Cystiphyllum Siluriense, Lonsd. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 38,-fig. 1). This wide species fre- quently has accessory roots like the Om- phyma (p. 113). | Cystiphyllum, ew sp. Compressed, and largely | vesicular, one specimen shews the growth of seven buds from the calyx. | Paleocyclus, Milne Edwards and Haime. A genus of pretty discoid corals, of very small size; which from their external character were long regarded by Edwards and Haime as representatives of the Fungide or mush- room corals, and as the only coral of the order Aporosa in Silurian times. It really belongs to the Rugosa (Duncan). Paleocyclus porpita, Linn. (Milne Edwards, Brit. Fos. Cor. t. 57, fig. 1). A circular and very depressed money-like species. Very common in the Dudley limestone. a, 337, Dudley, F.C. a. 371, Wenlock, figured specimen. Dudley, F. C.; bao) Wren’s nest; b. 720, Wool- hope (Wenlock Edge), a. 359, Dudley, F.C. a. 338, Dudley, F.C. a. 339, Dudley, F.C., M. Edwards, fig. 1. WENLOCK GROUP. Case and Column of Drawers. Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Names and References; Observations, &c. FC Gb8 FC Pl. 18, fig. 18, p. 33. Star-fishes. Crinoids or Sea-lilies. [Palzocyclus preacutus, Lonsdale, is the May | Hill Sandstone species, see p. 84 I do not remember that it is found in Wenlock strata except in 8. Wales.] | Paleocyclus Fletcheri, Milne Edwards (Brit. Fos. Cor. t. 57, fig. 3). A conical cup- | shaped species, more like Petraia than any other. The buds take their rise from the surface of the cup. Palzocyclus rugosus, Milne Edwards (Brit. Fos. Cor. p. 248, t. 57, fig. 4). Clisiophyllum vortex, McCoy, said to be from the Wenlock limestone—is without doubt the mountain limestone sp. C. coniseptum, Keyserling. Milne Edwards (Brit. Fos. Cor. t. 37, fig. 5). A common fossil in collections. ECHINODERMATA. Lepidaster, Forbes. Mem. Geol. Surv. Decade 3 | (distinct from Paleaster). Lepidaster Grayii, Forbes. Decade 3, pl. 1. Two fine large specimens. Roots, and stems (often swelled by disease) are extremely common, so common as to cha- racterize the whole formation. Separate plates of various genera are less common, but are found in the more shaly strata. I adopt the order in which the genera are given in the Synopsis for convenience of reference. But it is not a natural order. Some genera | have been since added; and many more remain to be described from the magnifi- | cent Fletcher Collection, and that of Mr John Gray of Hagley, now deposited in the British Museum. Mr C. Ketley of Smethwick has added largely to both col- | lections, both cystides and crinoids. | 117 Numbers and Localities. a. 340, Dudley, F.C. a. 341, Dudley, F.C. No doubt from the Carb. Limestone of Oswestry, figured specimens are a. 374. a. 717, Dudley, F:C€:; a. 716, Dudley, F.C., figured specimen. 118 Case and Column of Drawers. SILURIAN. Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. FC FC FC FC Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. a. Irregular Crinoids. Herpetocrinus, n.g. (Myelodactylus, Hall. The name, based on false ideas, cannot be kept. The column is described as fingers and wrongly named, for the pierced column and finger-joints are common characters). I am constrained to form a new genus for about three species of crinoids which de- part from all ordinary rules. A minute cup, all but obsolete, and with dichotomous nar- row arms, branched like those of Homo- erinus, Hall. This is set on a narrow cylin- drical suberect stem, which soon however becomes compressed, then hollowed on one side, and bears close set auxiliary arms to the lowest part, so far as observed. The stems coiled up like an adder, resemble arms of crinoids rather than stems. Herpetocrinus Fletcheri, n. sp. Stems two or three lmes wide at most; with narrow, smooth, unridged rings, not tuberculate, arms repeatedly dichotomous, linear. Other species exist in the Gray collection. Cheirocrinus, n.g. (Austin named it Pendulo- crinus, a bad name, for it is compounded of Latin and Greek). Chetrocrinus is now accepted generally. It was proposed in Siluria, 2nd ed. (commonly called 3rd ed.) 1859, by me. Cheirocrinus serialis, Austin, sp. (Siluria, 2nd ed, Appendix, p. 535). The upper arm is greatly larger than the others, and the lower ones crowded under it. Cheirocrinus abdominalis, n. sp. Shape like the last, but arms much more equal in size. Cheirocrinus gradatus, n. sp. Arms nearly equal in size; simple, form not very much oblique. a. 384, Dudley, F.C. a, 385, Dudley, F.C.; also cast of Gray’s specimen (Brit. Mus.). a. 386, Dudley, F. C. a. 887, Dudley, F.C. WENLOCK GROUP. 119 Case and Reference to McCoy’s Column of : . Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Drawers. Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Cheirocrinus Fletcheri, n.s. (C. sp. branched | a. 388, Dudley, F. C. arm) Fletcher Coll. Siluria, 2nd ed. App. p. 535. The finest and most curious of all the species. It has repeatedly branched nodose arms, and is the largest of all, and will shew us the affinities with other genera | at present obscure. FC b. Crinoids with double rows of plates in the arms. Marsupiocrinus, Phillips. The arrangement of the plates in the broad cup is that of Eucalyptocrinus, Goldfuss, and of Hypan- thocrinus. But the proboscis is not gigantic and solid as in the latter genus: and we do not know enough of Goldfuss’ figured genus. FC p. 54. Marsupiocrinus celatus, Phill. (Siluria, 2nd ed. | a. 667, with Pseudocrinus ; Gd pl. 14, fig. 1, and p. 247, woodcut 55, figs. | a. 389, Dudley, F.C.; a. 1—3). A fine series, shewing young and | 390, feeding on Acroculia, old cups, arms, interior of arms, stomach | Dudley, F. C.; a. 391, surface retracted in rest, or produced into | Dudley, interior of arms, proboscis for feeding on the Gasteropoda, | Ketley Coll.; casts of Gray’s Mr John Gray found that Actoculia Ha- | specimens (Brit. Mus.). | liotis was the favourite food. See woodcut in Siluria, Foss. 55, as above. Syriocrinus, Hall. Very much resembles Mar- | suprocrinus, if it be not the same genus. Hypanthocrinus, Phillips (Sil. Syst.), Zucalyp- tocrinus, Salter, &¢. in Siluria, 2nd ed. There is no ground for so altering the gene- ric name: though I myself was the first to propose it. The Devonian genus has a much shorter calyx, and several genera are now found to have the conspicuous star-like arrangement of plates round the | interradials b. 120 Case and Column of Drawers. SILURIAN. Reference to McCov’s Synopsis; and Figures of Genera. Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. FC FC FC} Ge FC FC Eucalyptocrinus, p. 58. Lucalyptocrinus, P). 1D, fig. 2, p. 58. For figures of several of these genera, see Siluria, 3rd ed. pl. 13, figs. 4, 5. Hypanthocrinus decorus, Phill. (Hucalyptocri- nus, Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 14, fig. 2). The remarkable large interbrachial plates (a) placed between the arms readily distinguish this from any other genus. The convex plates of the cup interradial (b) plates, placed between the radial (c) plates which go directly to the arms from the cup or calyx (basal plates, d), distinguish it from H. laciniatus, and H. granulosus, both Dudley and Walsall species. The nomenclature of the plates of the cup of a crinoid is best given by De Koninck, in his monograph of the Belgian Crinoidea from the Carboniferous Limestone. | Hypanthocrinus granulatus, Lewis. London Geological Journal, 1847, p. 99, pl. 21. Geol. Mus. Jermyn St. has good Walsall ones. Hypanthocrinus polydactylus, McCoy. An excellent species, easily distinguished from both the last by the many-branched arms. This species shews the affinity of Hypan- thocrinus to Marsupiocrinus very easily. Dimerocrinus, Phill. Sil. Syst. 1839. Still fur- ther removed than Marsupiocrinus from the last; there is yet much affinity. The inter- radial plates (a) are very conspicuous. The species very common at Dudley. | Dimerocrinus icosidactylus, Phill. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 13, fig. 4). The twenty arms and three or four interradials distinguish this common form from the next species. | Dimerocrinus multiplex, n. sp. Five or six or more interradials, none of which are con- spicuously larger than the rest. Dimerocrinus uniformis, n. sp. Cup all even, the sutures barely marking the smooth plates. Ten arms, which are parallel. a, 392, Dudley, F. C. a. 393, Dudley, F.C.; cast also from Gray’s specimens, Brit. Mus, a. 670, Dudley, F.C. good, with Glyptocrinus. a. 669, ditto, a, 404, Dudley, F. C. a, 405, Dudley, F. C. WENLOCK GROUP. Case and Column of Drawers. ‘eal FC FC FC FC Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Names and References; Observations, &c. 121 Numbers and Localities. Dimerocrinus decadactylus, Phill. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 13, fig. 5). Cup with convex highly ornamented plates. Ten arms which diverge. A common species. This grows large. A very fine specimen shews the arms and plates of the cup tuberculate. Periechocrinus, Austin. The largest and most common of Dudley crinoids, with a long conical cup—plated all the way up to the end of the bifurcation of the arms, which then, fifteen to thirty-four in number, are long, straight and unbranched; but of course not simple, being composed of a double row of bones, Proboscis massive, central. Stomach plates small. Stems mo- niliform, of thick joints. Range—May Hill Sandstone to Ludlow rock. Periechocrinus moniliformis, Miller, spec. (Si- luria, 2nd ed. pl. 13, figs. 1, 2). There are thirty-two or thirty-four arms. Pelvis coni- eal, ridged by the radial plates. The arms branch and dichotomise, Periechocrinus simplex, n.s. Arms fifteen only. Cup smaller and_ broader, radials strongly ridged, plates radiated. A very distinct good species. | Periechocrinus limonium, n.s. Arms twenty- seven or twenty-eight, as in moniliformis, but cup ovate. Scarcely ridged by the radial lines. Plates thin, looks like Hypan- thocrinus granulosus, a. 406, Dudley, F, C. a. 407, Dudley, F.C. a. 408, stem, a. 409, cup dissected, a. 410, arms all displayed, Dudley, F.C.; a, 411, proboscis (Ketley Coll.); a. 412, proboscis (Ketley Coll.); a 417, Dudley, F.C; a. 418, shews large pair of arms five- branched _(Ketley Coll.). a. 413, Dudley, F.C. a. 414, Dudley, F,C.; a. 415, shews the stomach- plates; a. 416, young, Dud- ley, F. C, 16 122 Case and Column of Drawers. Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. FC Gd FC FC FC Ge The figure in Stiluria wants | Platycrinus retiarius, Phill. (Siluria, 2nd ed. the stem. SILURIAN. Names and References; Observations, &c. Mariacrinus, Hall. A good genus, closely allied to the above, but the two rows of plates in the arm separate early, and form distinct branches, which again branch, or are rather feathered by arms in great numbers. The cup is in five pieces. Mariacrinus flabellatus, n.s. Named long ago by myself in the Fletcher Coll. at Dudley, and still unpublished. [Actinocrinus, proper, is sure to be found in the Wenlock limestone; since we have it from the Denbigh flagstone of Wales and Westmorland. | Platycrinus, Miller. Some little doubt exists if this be truly a Platycrinus, since the arms are truly simple, not double-jointed. Still it is so like, that it is convenient; and the species does not belong to Actinocrinus, to which it was referred. pl. 14, fig. 9). Small cup, the first radials large and broad for the size of the creature. Plumes short. Platycrinus pecten, Salter, n. sp. A much larger cup, and long straight comb-like plumes to the fingers. Glyptocrinus, Hall? Very few plates and very short arm-plates. Glyptocrinus, sp.1. Like no other crinoid that I know. Glyptocrinus expansus, Phill. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 15, figs. 1, 2). Very doubtfully be- longing to this genus. The cup is too large, and the series of plates not quite exact, as pointed out under G. basalis, in p. 45. It is convenient to leave it here for the present. Numbers and Localities. a. 419, three large speci- mens and eight roots and stems, Dudley, F.C.; a. 662, good, Dudley, F.C. a.420, Dudley, F.C.;a.665, good, Dudley, F. C.; a. 421, a large specimen shewing stem, Dudley, F.C.; a.422, shews pelvis well, Dudley, F.C. a. 423, Wren’s Nest, F.C. a, 512, Dudley, F.C. a. 508, interior of base of cup; a. 509; a. 510; a. 511, young with long stem, Dud- ley, F. C.; a. 669, good; a. 890, ditto; a. 889, un- crushed, round specimen, Dudley, F.C. WENLOCK GROUP. 123 Case and Column of Drawers. Reference to McCoy’s Names and References; Observations, &c, Numbers and Localities. Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Crotalocrinus, Aust. A most remarkable genus. In all other crinoids yet known the arms are free and the fingers free; in this they are all united by transverse processes into a flexible basket, just like wicker-work. To make the apparent anomaly greater, the arms appear, and appear only to start in M great numbers from the edge of the globu- C. rugosus, p. 55. lar calyx; whereas they really start from a point far inward on the stomach plates— the upper edge of the calyx being strongly and sharply inflected. Only one species is known in Britain, In Sweden another has been described by Miiller, which really has the five fans of fingers distinct at the base, and overlapping each other. The attinity is with our next genus, Cyathocrinus, to many species of which there is a remote resemblance in the numerous fingers, and the structure of the cup is the same, viz. one set of subradial plates, FC Crotalocrinus rugosus, Miller, (Siluria, 2nd | a. 424, a. 425, a. 426, var., Ge ed. Woodcut 55, fig. 4—7, p. 247, pl. 13, | a. 427, a. 428, shew sto- fig. 3), mach-surface; a. 430, base of all the arms; a. 429, a. 432, a. 433, roots, Dudley, F.C.; a. 431*, Gray’s cast; a. 671, the most perfect stomach - plates, balloon- shaped stomach (Ketley Coll.). Cyathocrinus, Miller. Cup of five basal pieces, with five intermediate (subradial) pieces, between which the arms originate. FO Cyathocrinus quinquangularis, Phill. (not | a. 435, Dudley, F. C. Mill.), Rhodocrinus, Sil. Syst. t. 18, fig. 5, FC Cyathocrinus (sp. 1). Like C. goniodactylus, | a, 499, Dudley, F. C. with similar cup, and general structure, but greatly thicker arms, FC Cyathocrinus (sp. 2) decadactylus, Salter. Ten | a. 494, Dudley, F. C. single arms, unbranched, and with very large thick tentacles, 16—2 124 Case and Column of Drawers. FC Gc2 FC Gd @ 2aQ Reference to McCoy's Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. un SILURIAN. Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Cyathocrinus (sp. 3) quindecimalis, Salter, MSS. Fifteen arms, like those of the last species, but with even thicker tentacles. N.B. These last two species form a very pecu- liar group—unlike other Wenlock species. Cyathocrinus (sp. 4) squamiferus, MSS. With very broad scale-like joints to the arms, which seem also thin and flat. Cyathocrinus (sp. 5). Small species, like C. arthriticus, but with arm-plates much longer in proportion and of course narrower. Cyathocrinus arthriticus, Phill. (Siluria, pl. 14, fig. 7). A species with greatly extended upper angles to the joints. Cyathocrinus goniodactylus, Phill. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 14, fig. 3). The commonest species— of all ages; the specimens often appear to form different species. Cyathocrinus, 2 new sp. A good deal like the young C. goniodactylus, but with thinner and more dichotomous arms. Cyathocrinus, sp. Cup of an allied species (roughly reticulate). Cyathocrinus, sp. A similar cup. Cyathocrinus, sp. With subangular arms like the two next, but distinct. Cyathocrinus (sp. 6) monile, MSS. Rounded and much-branched arms. Cyathocrinus nodulosus, MSS. Much like last, but only half the number of arms. Cyathocrinus capillaris, Phill. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 15, fig. 3). A pretty species, with slender, long and much-branched arms, and a very much ornamented calyx. a. 495, Dudley, F.C. 2 . 452, Dudley, F.C. » 486, Dudley, F.C. » 447, young; a. 448, . 449, Dudley, F.C. rx) a. 663, a. 664, good, Dud- ley, F.C. a. 444, a. 445, Dudley, HC. a. 446, Dudley, F.C. a. 450, Dudley, F.C. a. 496, Dudley, F.C. a. 487, Dudley, F.C. a. 487*, Dudley, (Ketley Coll.). a. 488, a. 489, a. 490, Dud- ley, F.C.; a. 491, (Ketley Coll.); a. 668, good, Dud- ley, F. C. WENLOCK GROUP. Case and Column of Drawers. Gc2 FC Gc2 FC FC Gc3 FC FC Reference to McCoy's Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Cyathocrinus (sp. 7) scoparius, MSS. s. Much like the last, but the arms more subdivided, and even apparently tufted; and the terminal stomach plates appear to have also ended in brush-like tufts. Cyathocrinus punctatus (Apiocrinus punctatus, Hisinger, Leth. Suec. p. 89, t. 25, fig. 2). Cyathocrinus (sp.8) Ichthyocrinoides. Like young punctatus, but with very short close arm-joints, and (smooth? pelvis). Cyathocrinus (sp.9) arboreus, MSS. Much branched, with round arms and fingers, and minute pelvis. Cyathocrinus (sp. 11). Like arborens, but greatly branched above. Taxocrinus, D’Orbigny. Distinguished from Cyathocrinus, which it much resembles, by the want of any subradial plates; the arms are simple, not double; and there are in general only a few interradial plates (a) in the cup. On the anal side only are those interradials brought down to the cup. Taxocrinus tuberculatus, Miller (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 14, figs. 5,6). The commonest species of the genus, easily discriminated by the strong tubercles all along the plates and arm-joints. Specimens of all ages shew that young crinoids have much fewer arms, or rather fingers, than old ones. Taxocrinus tesseracontadactylus, Hisinger, sp. (Leth. Suecica, t. 25, fig. 4). It is very doubtful if the Zazxocrinus simplex of Phillips be not this Swedish species. Taxocrinus simplex, Phill. (Sil. Syst. pl. 18, fig. 8). Taxocrinus marmoratus, Salter, n.s. The plates of the cup and the basal portions of the arms roughly tubercular. a. 491, Dudley, F.C. a. 436, a. 437, Dudley, F.C. a, 492, Dudley, F.C. a. 493, Dudley, F.C. a. 497, Dudley, F.C. a. 500, a. 501, Dudley, F.C. a. 500*, Dudley, F. C. a. 502, a. 503, a. 504, Dud- ley, F.C.; a. 506, interior (Ketley Coll.). a. 505; a. 507, Dudley, F.C. 126 Case and Column of Drawers. FC FC FC FC SILURIAN. Reference to McCoy's Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Names and References; Observations, &c. Taxocrinus granulatus, Salter, n.s. (Like marmoratus.) Taxocrinus nanus, Salter, n.s. Its squat form and single interradial easily introduce us to the next genus. Ichthyocrinus, D’Orbigny. Distinguished from Taxocrinus solely by the want of any inter- radial plates; the arms lie close together, and start at once from the basal plates or pelvis. Ichthyocrinus pyriformis, Phill. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 14, fig. 8). A most elegant crinoid, in which the short joints of the arms and fingers range equally across the whole figure, which is pyriform, and apparently never spread out. Ichthyocrinus Bacchus, MSS. n.s. The de- pressed short form and very short plates so much resemble those of Taxocrinus nanus, that some close observation is needful to distinguish this, which has no interradial plates, from the former, which possesses very narrow ones. (J. W.S.) CYSTIDEZ, Von Buch. Globe crinoids or Globe-lilies. | Crinoids in general plan: these are almost de- prived of the characteristic arms; a few ten- tacles round a wide stomachal surface (ambu- lacral, Huxley), the aperture of which is not yet known, are in a few genera exchanged for simple recurved arms (Pseudocrinites, Apiocystites, &c., and other Upper Silurian genera): these are laid in special grooves, so as to be as much out of the way as possible. The whole group has relations with Pentre- mites, through which it seems to approach the true Echinei, &c. The anal, usually called ovarian opening, is covered by projecting plates. (Billings.) Numbers and Localities, a, 530, Dudley, F.C. a. 527, Dudley, F.C. a. 498, a. 529, Dudley, F.C. a. 528, Dudley, F, C. Case and | Column of Drawers. Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. FC FC ca 2a FC FC FC WENLOCK GROUP. Names and References; Observations, &c. Apiocystites pentremitoides, Forbes (Mem, Geol. Surv. Vol. m1. Pt. 2, pl. 15, figs. 1—9), Siluria, 2nd ed, Woodcut 54, fig. 4, Prunocystites, Forbes (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 11. Pt. 2, p. 503, pl. 16). Prunocystites Fletcheri, Forbes (ib. pl. 16, figs. 1—4, Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss, 54, fig. 3). Pseudocrinites, Pearce. The first noticed of this group in Britain; but of course sup- posed to be a spurious kind of crinoid, with less than five arms. The three pectinated rhombs are thick-edged. Pseudocrinites quadrifasciatus, Pearce (Mem. Geol. Surv. ib. pl. 13, fig. 1), The com- mon species in Dudley limestone; rarely found elsewhere (Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 54, fig. 2). Pseudocrinites bifasciatus, Pearce. (Forbes, ib. p. 496, pl. 11). Only two arms, arranged as in P. magnificus. Pseudocrinites magnificus, Forbes (ib. pl. 12, fig. 1, Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 54, fig. 1). A very large species, the largest body of any (in Britain) with rhombs. Pseudocrinites oblongus, Forbes (ib, pl. 14, figs, 1—14, p. 499). Echino-encrinites, Volborth. A transverse long slit marks the place of the mouth; some doubt if this be quite the same genus as the Russian Upper Cambrian fossil de- scribed by Volborth: still more if ZH. bac- catus belong to the same genus, Numbers and Localities. a, 588, Dudley, F.C.; a. 589, a. 590, Dudley, (Ket- ley Coll.); figured by Forbes. a. 586, a. 587, Dudley, F.C. a. 594, stem; a. 595, ten- tacles and rhombs; a. 596, young; a. 597, grooves for arms; a. 666, good, Dudley, F.C. a. 591, a.592,a. 593, figured specimens, Dudley, F.C. a. 598, Cast (Gray Coll. B. Mus. cast), Dudley, F.C. a, 599, figured, Dudley, F.C. 128 SILURIAN. Case and Column of Drawers. Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Names and References; Observations, &c. FC FC FC FC FC FC FC FC Gc4 Worm-tracks, tubes and shells. p. 63. Echino-encrinites armatus, Forbes (Mem. Geol. Surv. ib. pl. 18, figs. 1—12). A compressed square species, granulated all over, a boss on each plate (Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss, 54, fig. 6). Echino-encrinites baccatus (Mem. Geol. Surv. 1. Pt. 2, pl. 17, figs. 1—10), Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 54, fig. 5). Ateleocystites, Billings. Founded on a Cana- dian fossil from the Trenton limestone of Ottawa. The flattened form and single anal plate easily distinguish it. Ateleocystites Fletcheri, Salter, n.s. Much larger and broader than the Canadian spe- cies, rare, and yet not quite local. Pisocrinus, De Koninck. The globular calyx, with apparently no rhombs, and long ten- tacular arms (Dr Grindrod of Malvern has them in his cabinet). Pisocrinus pilula, De Koninck, Bull. Acad. Roy. des Scien. de Bruxelles, Vol. tv. 2 ser. p- 106, t. 2, figs. 8—11. Pisocrinus ornatus, id. 2 ser. Vol. Iv. p. 107. ANNELIDA. Cliona? or Vioa. Borings of a minute annelide inside the shell of Orthoceras. Cornulites serpularius, Schloth. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 16, figs. 3—10). A shelly tube with cellular varices (knots) like Tentaculites, also grows in knots of 3, 4—8 young shells, separating afterwards. Tentaculites ornatus, Sow. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 16, fig. 11). In Miinster’s coll. this is called 7. striato-costatus. It has a wide range. Numbers and Localities. a. 582, a. 583, Wenlock Shale, Walsall, figured by Forbes; a. 584, a. 585, ditto, Malvern, figured edge of mouth, and shews the rhombs. a. 606, figured; a. 607, a. 608, Dudley, F. C. a. 600, ovarian side; a. 601, ventral; a. 602, dorsal side; a. 603, ditto; a. 604, young ; a. 605, base and part of stem, Dudley, F.C. b. 450, Wenlock Shale, Malvern. b. 452, Dudley, F. C. a. 467, Dudley, F.C. a, 531, variety with very close rings in youth; a. 686, a var. with very remote rings in youth, Dudley, F.C. a. 688, (Miinster’s), a. 688*, Dudley, F.C. Case and Column of Drawers. Reference to McCoy's Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. WENLOCK GROUP. 129 Names and References; Observations, &c. FC Gc4 Gc5 Gc4 G@c5d Gd Serpulites dispar, p. 182. Bwalve Shrimps, Water- Fleas, and Trilobites. p. 136. PL.1 , fig. 2, p. 135. 0 GB | Scolecoderma, Salter. The tubes of mud-loving annelides are thin and membranous usually. (S. dispar, Salter, is a true Serpulites.) [Turrilepas, H. Woodward. Shelly plates ar- ranged in four rows, unsymmetrical, cari- nated, and imbricated, with a uniformly sculptured surface, destitute of lateral pro- cesses. Considered to be related to Lori- cula, Scalpellum, and other pedunculated cirripeds. Mr Salter considered it an Annelide tube, shelly, of numerous plates imbricating backwards, and proposed the name Oplo- scolex for it. Hdiior.] Turrilepas Wrightianus, De Kon. (Chiten, De Kon, Bull. Acad. Roy. Bruxelles, 2 ser. Vol. 1. p. 199, tab. 1, fig. 2). Turrilepas, Woodward (Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. Vol. 21, p. 486, pl. 14, fig. 1). Turrilepas Ketleyanus, Salter, sp. MS. CRUSTACEA Phyllopoda. metropolis of the Trilobite group, there are a good many genera (all, with two excep- tions, the same as Cambrian) and the species and individuals are very numerous in Wenlock and Dudley strata. Small Phyllo- pods and large shrimp-like forms (Ceratio- caris) begin to be abundant and numerous in species. Ceratiocaris, sp. The genus will be more fully described in the Ludlow rocks, and it is doubtful if this one be of Wenlock age. Beyrichia Kloedeni, McCoy. (Ann. N. Hist. 2 ser. Vol. xvi. pl. 6, figs. 7—9). The genus is a most natural and convenient one for those small-lobed and tubercled bivalve crustacea which it represents. Though the Upper Cambrian rocks are the | Numbers and Localities. a.897, a.695, Dudley, F.C.; | a. 698, Dinas Bran, in Wen- lock Shale. a. 532, Dudley, F. C.; b. 729, Dudley (Mr Ketley). b.730, Dudley (Mr Ketley). a. 694, Dudley, in Upper Shale. a, 886, McCoy’s figured specimen, Myddfai, Llan- dovery; b. 731, Llanfair, Welchpool. 17 130 SILURIAN. Cee Reference to McCoy’s N a Ref : Ob P ate aay Gyrlonnis and ioures of Genera: ames an eferences ; servations, &c. Numbers and Localities. CRUSTACEA Trilobita. Lichas, Dalm. Almost as curiously constructed as Acidaspis, and apparently a close ally. The lobes of the glabella are reversed, as to size, from the usual plan. FC Lichas scutalis, Salter MSS. (L. verrucosus, | a. 954, Malvern, Wenlock Salter, Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 11. Pt. 1, pl. 8, | Shale, Dudley, F.C. fig. 7, not Eichwald). FC Lichas Salteri, Fletcher (Quart. Journ. Geol. | a. 953, Dudley, F.C. Soc. Vol. vi. t. 27, fig. 9, p. 237). FC Lichas Grayii, Fletcher and Salter (ib. Vol. vi. | b. 26, b. 27, figured speci- Gc6 p. 237, t. 27, fig. 8). mens, a. 699, Dudley, F.C. FC Lichas hirsutus, Fletcher and Salter (ib. Vol. | a. 961—a. 965, Dudley, VI. p. 236, t. 27, figs. 6, 7). HC: FC Lichas Barrandii, Fletcher and Salter (ib. Vol. | b.28, b. 29, figured, Dudley, VI. p. 238,t. 27, fig. 10. Siluria, 2nd ed. | F.C. Foss. 63, fig. 3). FC Acanthopyge, p. 151. Lichas anglicus, Beyrich, sp. (ib. t. 27, figs. | a.958, a.959, a. 960, good; Gd 1—5, Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 63, fig. 1). A | a. 955, figured, a. 956, most curious glabella, with puffed lobes like | a.957, Dudley, F.C. ; b.732, the cheeks of a baboon. Dudley. Cheirurus, Beyrich. A very natural group, allied to Phacops, and yet with affinities for Encrinurus, Cybele, &c. The tail is palmate; the body rings strongly sculptured. FC Ceraurus Williamsi, Cheirurus bimucronatus, Murch. (Salter, Mon. | a. 533, a. 534, figured speci- Paseo elo pa laD: Brit. Tril. t. 5, figs. 1—5, Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 64, fig. 4, pl. 3, fig. 5, pl. 19, figs. 10, 11). Encrinurus, Emmrich. Clavate glabella, pe- dunculate eyes, and plain sub-cylindrical pointed body rings; tail of many joints. mens (Salter) in Decade 7, Geol. Surv. pl. 2, figs. 4—6, Dudley, F. C. WENLOCK GROUP. 131 eee Reference to McCoy’s Drawers. Synopsis ; and Figures of Genera. FC p. 158. Gc4 FOC Zethus, p. 157. Gd FC FC BE ie ig 15, p. 153: FC p. 160. Gd FC | As Odontochile caudata, p. 160. FC Portlockia, p. 163. Gd FC Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Encrinurus punctatus, Briinnich (Decade 7, Geol, Sury. t. 4, fig. 15, Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 14, fig. 10; 64, fig. 5, pl. 10, fig. 5). Encrinurus variolaris, Brong. (ib. 7, t. 4, figs. 13, 14, Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 18, fig. 9, Foss. 64, fig. 6). Tail blunt, of few rings. Spherexochus, Beyrich. A most extreme form of Chetrurus, in which all the sculpture of the body rings is lost. Spherexochus mirus, Beyrich (Salter, Mon. Brit. Tril. t. 7, figs. 1—6, and Decade 7, pl. 7, Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 64, fig. 1). Staurocephalus, Barr. An exaggerated Chei- rurus with a strongly clavate and peduncu- lated glabella. Body rings 10, tail pectinate. Staurocephalus Murchisoni, Barr. (Decade 11, Geol. Surv. pl. 5, figs. 1—4, Salter, Mon. Brit. Tril. p. 84, pl. 7, figs. 13—20). Phacops Downingiz, Murch. (Salter, Mon. Brit. Tril. pl. 2, figs. 17—25, Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 64, fig. 3, pl. 18, figs. 2, 5). Phacops Downingix, var. constrictus, Salter (Mon. Brit. Tril. p. 27, pl. 2, figs. 13—16). Phacops Stokesii, M. Edw. (Salter, Mon. Brit. Tril. p. 21, pl. 2, fig. 6, Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 10, fig. 6). Phacops Musheni, Salter (Mon. Brit. Tril. p. 23, pl. 2, figs. 7—12). a, 539, figured specimen, Fletcher, Geol. Journ. Vol. vi.; a. 541, a. 542, labrum; a, 540 shews eyes well; Dudley, F.C. ; b. 732, Myd- dleton Park, Caermarthen. a, 537, fine rolled-up speci- men; a. 538 shews the la- brum in position; Dudley, F.C. a. 543, tail figured, De- cade 7, Geol.Sury., Dudley, F.C. > 544, Dudley, F.C. a. 568, to a. 573, and a.575, a. 576, Dudley, F.C.; a. 888, fine specimen, Dud- ley, F.C. a. 574, Dudley, F. C. a. 578, Wenlock Shale, Dudley, F. C.; a. 895, Llan- gynyw Rectory, Welchpool; a. 887, Dudley, F. C. a. 577, rolled-up speci- mens, a. 579, Dudley, F.C. 17—2 Siluria, 132 SILURIAN. Po aie Reference to McCoy's N d Ref - Ob : : aly Senoeaes madi seoreuencenees ames and References ; Observations, &c. FC Odontochile, p. 160. Phacops caudatus, Brongn. (Mon. Brit. Tril. Gc4 pl. 8, figs. 4—18, pl. 4, figs. 1—5. Gd 2nd ed. pl. 17, fig. 2, pl. 18, fig. 1). FC Odontochile, p. 161. Phacops longicaudatus, Murch. (Mon. Brit. Ge4 Tril. pl. 3, figs. 19—28, Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 17, figs. 3—6). FC Phacops longicaudatus, var. 8 Grindrodianus (ib. pl. 3, figs. 2—28). Gc4 Phacops longicaudatus, var. armiger, Salter (ib. pl. 2, figs. 19—21). Gc5 Phacops tuberculato-caudatus, Salter (ib. pl. 4, fig. 1), probably var. of P. caudatus. Calymene, Brongniart. The most compact and elegant form of the whole Trilobite group; | moderate head and glabella; thirteen body rings and tail of six or seven joints; labrum | notched. HC p. 165. Calymene Blumenbachii, Brongn. (Salter, Mon. Gc4 As C. subdiademata, Brit. Tril. pl. 8, figs. 7—16, Siluria, 2nd ed. Gd pl. 17, fig. 1, pl. 18, fig. 10). RIMES ies. 9) LO p: 16Gb: The young state is known in Sweden as C. pulchella. The older form is figured under all sizes, shapes and names in geological works. It is the Dudley locust of collectors. Numbers and Localities. a. 557, a.557*, large, a. 558, a, 559, interior, two speci- mens; a. 560, large eyes; a. 561, tail; a. 562, young; a. 563, labrum; a. 564, la- brum, Dudley, F.C.; a. 654, interior, Dudley; a. 691, cast of Mr Lightbody’s specimen from Ledbury; a. 692, the specimen from near Llandeilo, wrongly said by the collector to be from Lower Bala. b. 735, W. Shale, Myddle- ton Park; a. 567, Malvern, EEC: a. 565, a. 566, Wenlock Shale, Malvern, F. C. b. 736, b. 737, Burrington, Cheney Longville. a. 696, Lower Ludlow, Dudley, F.C. a. 547, young; a.548, older; a. 549, young; a. 530, young; a. 551, a. 552, good interiors; a. 553, largest known, except Mr Ma- thew’s specimen (of which b. 733 is a cast); a. 554, expanded specimen; a. 655, fine large specimen; a. 656, a. 657, good speci- mens, Dudley, F.C.; a. 690, Coed Sion, Llangadoe. WENLOCK GROUP. Case and Column of Drawers. Reference to McCoy’s Synopsis : and Figures of Genera. Names and References; Observations, &c. Gd FC Gc4 Gcé6 p. 167. H. Knighti, p. 168. Forbesia, p. 174. Calymene tuberculosa, Salter (Decade 2, pl. 8, figs. 1—8, Siluria, 2nd ed. 18, fig. 11). Dis- tinguished by the narrow axis and_hori- zontal pleura’, also the produced front. Homalonotus, Konig. A large Trilobite very closely related to Calymene, but with the axis so broad and so little raised above the pleurz as to make the back even (ouanos). Homalonotus delphinocephalus, Green (Sil. Syst. t. 7 bis, fig. 1, Siluria, Foss. 18, fig. 1, Salter, Mon. Brit. Tril. pl. 11, figs. 1—11). Abundant in Dudley limestone. The tail has a very short mucro. Homalonotus Johannis, Salter (Mon. Brit. Tril: pl. 12, fig. 11, pl. 18, figs. 1—7). Tlenus insignis, Hall (Salter, Mon. Brit. Tril. t. 27, figs. 6, 7. ll. Barriensis, Sil. Syst. and Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. 17, figs. 9—11). Differs by gibbous head, position of eyes, and all characters from the common Wool- hope species, J. Barriensis, Murch. Cyphaspis, Burmeister. A genus of small trilo- bites related to Proetus, but with basal glabella lobes strongly circumscribed, and fourteen or fifteen body rings, rarely eleven or twelve. Cyphaspis megalops, McCoy. (Decade 7, Geol. Surv. pl. 5, Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 64, fig. 2). Proetus, Steininger (Mem. Geol. Soc. France). Allied to the terminal forms (Carboniferous era) of the Asaphus group of Trilobites. It has a rostral shield like Phillipsia and Cyphaspis, and the species vary very much in outline and number of body rings, eight to twelve (Barrande) ; a. 700 is one of the undescribed forms. Proetus, spp. Two or three undescribed forms from Dudley and Wenlock, and Tortworth (Falfield) and Ledbury. Numbers and Localities. b. 734, Wenlock Shale, Burrington, Cheney Long- ville, b. 738, Falfield, Tortworth (Earl Ducie) ; a.555, Dud- ley, presented by Captain Fletcher; a. 556, cast of Blackwell's specimen, Geol. Surv. Coll. a. 693, Myddleton Park, Caermarthen. a. 580, Dudley, F.C.; a. 581 (rostral shield of do.); a. 653, good, Dudley, F. C. a. 545, a. 546, a. 547, Dud- ley, F.C.; a. 689, Dudley, described by McCoy. a. 700, Dudley, F.C. 134 SILURIAN. Cae Beterenca 2 McOor's Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. Drawers. Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. Fi orbesia, p. 174. Proetus latifrons, McCoy. (Mem. Geol. Surv. Vol. 1. pt. 1, t. 6, fig. 1.) FC Proetus Fletcheri, Salter. A broader species | a. 825, good, a. 828, in all parts, more like P. Ryckholti, than | Dudley, F.C. P. latifrons, McCoy. FC Proetus Stokesii, Murch. (Siluria, 2nd ed. pl. | a. 899, a. 900, good, long 17, fig. 7). Related to the Cyphaspis by its | head spines, a. 901, a. 902, small glabella and strong basal lobes. interior, Dudley, F. C. Acidaspis, Murchison (Odontopleura, Emmrich, a little later in the same year). A curious genus allied to Lichas. The lobes of the glabella are scarcely separated from the cheeks. Spines ornament every part, differ- ing according to species. FC Acidaspis coronatus, Salter (Quart. Journ. Geol. | a. 658, a. 697, Dudley; Ged Soc. Vol. x1. p. 210). The free cheeks | b.30, to b.38, good (figured have very thick sinuous head-angles. by Salter), probably from the Lower Ludlow Shale, Dudley, F.C. FC p. 152. Acidaspis Brightii, Murch. (Siluria, 2nd ed. | a. 974, a. 975, figured in Foss. 64, fig. 8, pl. 18, figs. 7, 8). Fletcher; a. 976, young, good; Dudley, F.C. Acidaspis dama, Fletcher and Salter (Morris, Catal. Brit. Foss. 2nd ed. p. 99). FC Acidaspis crenatus, Emmrich (Neus Jahrb. | a. 966, good; Dudley, F.C. 1845, p. 44. Ceraurus, Loven, Ofvers Kon. | a. 967, cast (Gray Coll.). Vet. Ak. 1845, t. 1, fig. 1, Siluria, 2nd ed. 1859, Appendix, p. 537). Acidaspis dumetosus, Fletcher and Salter (Morris, Catal. p. 99). FC Acidaspis quinquespinosus, Fletcher and Salter | a. 969 (with a. 968); a. 970, (Morris, Catal. p. 99). cast, Gray Coll.; a. 971, a. 972, figured; a. 973, seven spines; Dudley, F.C. FC Acidaspis Barrandii, Fletcher and Salter | a. 968, tail, in slab with (Morris, Catal. 2nd ed. p. 99, Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 64, fig. 9). This belongs to Trapelocera of Corda, a good sectional name (Siluria, 2nd ed. Foss. 64, fig. 9). Acidaspis quinquespinosus; a. 970*—973*, figured in Fletcher and Salter; Dud- ley, F.C. cea Reference to McCoy's Drawers. Synopsis: and Figures of Genera. FC I S SS () Gc7 FC FC Pl. 1 4, figs. 4, 5, p. 255. See Athyris. WENLOCK GROUP. 135 Names and References; Observations, &c. Numbers and Localities. BRACHIOPODA (Palliobranchiata). Are easily divisible into (1) horny and hinge- less shells (Lingula, Discina, Obolus), and (2) hinged calcareous shells, Orthis, Spirifer, &e. The passage from the young Lamellibranch to the Brachiopod is easily seen by laying open a young ultima, 22 nh vexata, 22 Caninia » lata, 113 INDEX. Caninia turbinata, 113 Capulus, 89, 154 CarDIOLA » interrupta, 96, 152, 170 5 striata (Ambonychia), 151 CaryocaRris 3 Wrightii, 21 CaryYocystITEs, 45 Catenipora . escharoides, 42, 111 Centropleura, 13, 15, 17 CrpHaLopopa: see MoLLusca CERATIOCARIS ellipticus, 178 » inornatus, 177, 178 insperatus, 16 » latus, 16 ts leptodactylus, 164 » papilio, 178 s robustus, 164 iy solenoides, 178 » __ Stygius, 178 55 ?umbonatus, 48 7 species, 129 Crrropora, 100, 107 Ceraurus Hs clavifrons, 50, 51 55 Williamsi, 130 CH&TETES, 108 Cheetetes, 107 Chasmops % Odini (2), 52 CHEIROCRINUS, 118 7 abdominulis, 115 * Fletcheri, 119 5 gradatus, 118 4 serialis, 118 CHEIRURUS 3 bimucronatus, 77, 86, 130 7 Frederici, 17 A juvenis, 51 5) octolobatus, 51 5 Sedgwickii, 33 CHONDRITES 5 verisimilis, 99 CHONETES » levigata, 95, 148 » lata, 89, 148, 169, 181, 190 3 minima, 95, 148, 169 53 » var. Grayi, 148 os striatella, 169 CLEIDOPHORUS ovalis, 65, 96 ie planulatus, 152 Cleodora, 67 CLIMACOGRAPSUS, 28 55 bicornis, 29 5 scalaris, 28 Cron, 40, 128 CLISIOPHYLLUM coniseptum, 117 a vortex, 117 CNEMIDIUM tenue, 99 Coelocrinus, 45 Canitxs, 100, 105 Fy intertextus, 106 » Juniperinus, 106 7 labrosus, 106 3 linearis, 106 7 strigatus, 106 Conocephalus, 5, 13 ConocoRYPHE a abdita, 13 op applanata, 5 . bufo, 5 “5 coronata, 5 - depressa, 15 ~ ecorne, 12 ss Homfrayi, 5 * humerosa, 5 fs invita, 13 9 Lyelli, 2 x monile, 32 “ variolaris, 5 i verisimilis, 15 - Williamsoni, 12 Pe species, 5 CoNULARIA D bifasciata, 171 5 cancellata, 67, 153, 185 * clavus, 153 3 corium, 24 5 Homfrayi, 18 x) Sowerbyi, 67, 153, 171, 185 3 subtilis, 185 CoRNULITES + serpularius, 85, 93, 128, 177 Coscinopora, 99 CRANIA » divaricata, 34, 55 », Grayii, 135 » implicata, 135, 180 Cresets, 66, 159 » NSedgwickit, 158 Crossopopi lata, 189 aS Scotica, 48 CROTALOCRINUS rugosus, 123 CRUSTACEA, Merrostomata, 165, 178, 188, 193 rs PHYLLOPODA, 7, 10, 16, 21, 31, 48, 76, 93, 129, 164, 177, 189, 193 5 Trinopita, 2, 4, 10, 15, 17, 21, 31, 48, 76, 86, 93, 130, 165, 177, 189 CRUZIANA 5 8emiplicata CRYPTOGAMIA (Algz), 1 CTENODONTA > anglica, 96, 152, 170, 184 ny Edmundiiformis, 66, 184 = elongata, 24 5 Hughesii, 82 - lingualis, 89 5 primitiva, 184 . rotunda, 24 > subzequalis, 89, 190 . varicosa, 66 x species, 152 CUCULELLA + antiqua, 66, 191 a coarctata, 170, 183 ; ovata, 183, 191 . species, 152, 183 CYATHOCRINUS is arboreus, 125 3 arthriticus, 124 v1 capillaris, 124 3 decadactylus, 123 3 goniodactylus, 124 H Ichthyocrinoides, 125 monile, 124 3 nodulosus, 124 F punctatus, 125 5 quindecimalis, 124 S quinquangularis, 123 i scoparius, 125 species, 76, 124, 162 CYATHAXONIA + Siluriensis, 162 CYATHOPHYLLUM 7 angustum, 112 es articulatum, 112 op ceespitosum, 112 as Craigense, 43 7 dianthus, 112 5 flexuosum, 112 5 Loyveni, 112 * pseudoceratites, 92, 112 Sp trochiforme, 113 5) truncatum, 112 ép species, 112 CYBELE » rugosa, 51 » verrucosa, 51 Cycloceras, 71, 158, 159, 186, 187 CYCLONEMA 5 cirrhosa, 155 3 Corallii, 172, 185 =. crebristria, 69, 90 : lyrata, 69 octavia, 156, 172, 185 Ph triporcata, 69 i undifera, 172 a species, 155 INDEX. OypHasPIs 5 megalops, 77, 133 Cypricardites, 66 Cyrroceras 5 Biddulphii, 160 ” compressum, 160 +p corniculum, 160 a multicameratum, 37 3 spécies, $3, 174 Oyrtodonta, 66 CyrroLirEs 5 levis, 173, 185 CyrTorHEca p hamula, 8 CYSTIDEA, 3, 45, 126, 127 CyYsTIPHYLLUM 7 brevilamellatum, 116 cylindricum, 116 5 Grayii, 116 55 Siluriense, 116 CYTHERE » Aldensis, 31 Cytheropsis, 31 Delthyris cardiospermiformis, 144 DENDOGRAPSUS arbuscula, 21 ¥ furcatula, 21 5 species, 20, 161 DicHoGRapsts, 20 5 aranea, 21 5 octobrachiatus, 21 bs Sedgwickii, 21 + species, 21 Dictyocaris 5 Slimoni, 177 DicTYONEMA sp retiformis, 101 . sociale, 9 DipyMOGRAPSUS constrictus, 20 ; genuinus, 20 an Hirundo, 20 +5 latus, 20 55 Murchisoni, 29 Pantoni, 20 a sextans, 29 5 V-fractus, 20 DIKELLOCEPHALUS

Milleri, 45, 101 patula, 101 os rigidula, 101 A subantiqua, 45, 101 5, species, 101 FIsTuLirora, 99 5 decipiens, 103 Forbesia, 133, 134, 165 Fucoids, 99 Fucus » cartilagineus, 99 GLAUCONOME > disticha, 76, 101 Glauconome, 76 GLYPTOOCRINUS 5 basalis, 45 ) expansus, 122 as species, 85, 92 GOMPHOCERAS, 160, 174 GonroPpHoRs = cymbeeformis, 182, 191 5 grandis, 151 GoNIOPHYLLUM 5 Pletcheri, 114 9 pyramidale, 114 GRAMMYSIA ns cingulata, 151, 184 5 var. obliqua, 184 + extrasulcata, 184 % rotundata, 184 A triangulata, 184, 191 INDEX. Grantia, 99 GRaAPTOLITES . colonus, 103 s convolutus, 27 5 Flemingii, 91 foliaceus, 28 5 Hisingeri, 19, 27 A lobiferus, 27 x Ludensis, 39,91, 102, 161, 176 3 Millipeda, 27 9 Nilssoni, 27 oy priodon, 39, 84, 91, 102, 161, 176 3 sagittarius, 39 33 sagittarius, 27, 91 0 Sedgwickii, 27, 39 rn scalaris, 28 p tenuis, 27, 39 as teretiusculus, 28 GRAPTOLITHUS, 19, 27 GRAPTOLITIDE, 39, 85 GRAPTOPORA 5 sociale, 9 GRAPTOTHECA catenulata, 171 Hatysires, 110 5 catenularius, 111 3 catenulatus, 42, 74, 84 3 labyrinthicus, 42, 111 Harps » parvulus, 54 Harpides, 5 Harpidella 5 megalops, 77, 133 HELIOLITES x czespitosa, 104 os favosa, 40 > Grayi, 104 = interstincta, 29, 40, 84, 103 3 megastoma, 41, 74, 84, 103 5 Murchisoni, 103 5 petalliformis, 103 ) var. 104 PA subtilis, 74 5) subtubulata, 41 3 tubulata, 41, 73, 104 A species, 104 HELMINTHITES, 21 HeEMIASPIS 5 aculeatus, 178 Py species, 189 Hemithyris ss angustifrons, 56 > crispata, 94, 141, 167 5 Davidsoni, 141, 150 oa depressa, 56, 143 5 didyma, 94, 167 of diodonta, 94 Hemithyris lacunosa, 87, 140 _ Lewisti, 94, 140 oy nasuta, 56 59 navicula, 141, 167 os nucula, 87, 94, 141, 167, 180 + pentagona, 141 5 pisum, 143 “5 spheeroidalis, 141, 167 i upsilon, 87 x Wilsoni, 180 HERPETOCRINUS A Fletcheri, 118 Hereropopa ; see MoLLuscA HoLocEPHALINA - primordialis, 4 Houoprna cancellata, 90 . conica, 69 By exserta, 69 be gregaria, 90 5 lymnzeoides, 69 striatella, 69 53 tritorquata, 90 Folopea, 68, 69 HOoLoPELia 9 cancellata, 185 5 conica, 191 5 gracilior, 172 ‘i gregaria, 97, 185, 191 “5 intermedia, 172 = monilis, 70 35 obsoleta, 186, 191 ss tenuicincta, 183 HomaLonorus 3 bisuleatus, 33, 53 Be eylindricus, 93 » delphinocephalus, 133 o Johannis, 133 major, 7 rf vermicauda, 10 Hypantuocrinvs, 119 5 decorus, 120 55 granulatus, 120 - polydactylus, 92, 120 IcHTHYOCRINUS a Bacchus, 126 IcuTHyocrinus McCoyanus, 163 5 pyriformis, 126 ILLZ{NUS » Barriensis, 54, 133 > Bowmanni, 54, 77 . crassicauda, 34 - Davisii, 54 insignis, 133 5 Rosenbergi, 54 x Thomsoni, 77, 86 IscHADITES PA Koenigii, 100 7 micropora, 40 Tsotelus, 17, 33 KUTORGINA 5 cingulata, 14 LABECHIA, 109 5 conferta, 110 LAMELLIBRANCHIATA : see MOLLUSCA LEPERDITIA : - marginata, 189, 193 prima, 2 LEPIDASTER : 5 Grayii, 117 Leptagonia ss depressa, 62, 88, 95, 181 i ungula, 62 Leptodomus ay amygdalinus, 89, 183 op truncatus, 183 op undatus, 183 LEPTZNA » alternata, 62, 95 » antiquata, 61, 88, 147 ~ compressa, 62, 63, 8S » deltoidea, 63, 88 » euglypha, 146 » filosa, 146 » funiculata, 63, 88 » grandis, 63 » Ouralensis, 146 » pecten, 88, 146 » quinquecostata, 64 5 Quinquecostata, 64 » Yrhombica, 64 » Scissa, 82, 89 PB sericea, 36, 64, 82, 89 + a var. 82 » sptriferoides, 60 » tenuicincta, 64 » tenuissimestriata, 64 » tenuissimestriata, 95 . transyersalis, 63, 82, 89, 95, 147 » var. undulata, 64 » Species, 64 Leptena, 61, 62, 63, 64, 88, 146 LicHAs ” Lichas, Limaria, 105 LINGULA, 136 » attenuata, 34 » cornea, 180, 190, 193 » corned, 166, 179 » curta, 34 » granulata, 34 » lata, 166 INDEX. Anglicus, 130 Barrandii, 130 bulbiceps ? 77 Grayii, 130 hirsutus, 130 laciniatus, 50 laxatus, 50 nodulosus, 50 patriarchus, 33 Salteri, 130 scutalis, 130 verrucosus, 130 134 » clathrata, 106 » Jruticosa, 106 » Lewisii, 137, 166, 180 » longissima, 55 » minima, 166, 179, 190 » parallela, 86 » petalon, 23 » Ramsayi, 34 » Symondsii, 137 » Species, 78, 137 LINGULELLA x Davisii, 13 5 ferruginea, 2, 8 5 lepis, 13 5 species, 14, 16 | LINGULOCARIS “ linguleecomes, 16 | Litiopa, 69 Litorina, 156, 172, 185 Litvurres, 160 Lituites, 70, 160 LoxoNEMA Lun Lycopodiacee, 188, 193 LYRODESMA » obtusa, 34 » ovata, 55 , tenuigranulata, 55 » anguiformis, 71 | 5 articulatus, 174 » cornu-arietis, 71 » Planorbiformis, 71 5 elegans, 172 % sinuosa, 172 33 species, 70, 157 ulacardium, 151 op cuneata, 89 * plana, 65 MAcLUREA 199 » Logani, 37 » macromphala, 68 5 macromphala, 70 MAcROcHEILUS ” pupa, 156 MARIACRINUS ” flabellatus, 122 MARsuPriocRINus ” MERISTELLA »”» ” ” A ceelatus, 119 angustifrons, 56, 79 Circe, 139 crassa, 79, 94 didyma, 87, 94, 139, 167 furcata, 88 ] zeviuscula, 139 subundata, 79 tumida, 87, 139 Micropiscus punctatus, 4 sculptus, 2 Modiola, 65, 190 MoproLopsis MOLLUSC ” antiqua, 150 complanatus, 190 gradatus, 150, 170 inflata, 65 leevis, 182, 190 modiolaris, 65 mytilimeris, 150 orbicularis, 65 planata, 182, 190 platyphyllus, 190 solenoides, 182, 190 AL Bracuropopa, 2, 8, 13, 16, 23, 34, 54, 78, 86, 93, 135, 166, 179, 190, 193 CEPHALOPODA, 18, 70, 83, 90, 97, 158, 173, 186, 192 GASTEROPODA, 36, 68, 83, 89, 97, 153, 171, 185 Hereropopa, 17, 37, 66, 83, 90, 97, 157, 173, 186, 192 LAMELLIBRANCHIATA, 36, 64, 82, 89, 96, 149, 169, 181 Preropopa, 8, 16, 17, 66, 90. 153, 171, 184 MOoNTICULIPORA Bowerbankii, 109 Fletcheri, 108 papillata, 109 pulchella, 108 poculum, 109 species, 109 MURCHISONIA ” ” angustata, 36 articulata, 172, 185 200 MorcaisoniA cancellatula, 69, 83 5 cingulata, 172 5 eyclonema, 155 5 gyrogonia, 69 5 Lloydii, 155, 171 es pulchra, 69, 83 5) scalaris, 69 = simplex, 69 5 simplex, 83 ay torquata, 185, 191 * tricincta, 83 35 turrita, 68 x species, 90, 155 Murchisonites on antiquus, 2 Myelodactylus, 118 MYRIANITES % McLeayii, 30 op tenuis, 47 Mytitus » mimus, 182 » mytilimeris, 89 » unguiculatus, 96 Natica, 90 Natvicopsis 3 glaucinoides, 172 3 parva, 185 Naticopsis, 90 5 glaucinoides, 185 NEBULIPORA Ps explanata, 41 = favulosa, 29, 41 lens, 41 re papillata, 41, 176 5 see MonrvICULIPORA NEREITES 5 Cambrensis, 31, 47 ae Sedgwickii, 30, 47 NEMERTITES Ft Olivantii, 30 NIDULITES a favus, 72 NIoBE » Homfrayi, 15 Nucleobranchiata, 37 NucLEospPira 7% pisum, 143 Nucula » levata, 66, 96 NUvUcULITES 35 poststriatus, 96 OBOLELLA 5 maculata, 8 - nucleata, 8 4 Phillipsii, 14 " plicata, 24 6 plumbea, 24 INDEX. OBOLELLA sagittalis, 8 * Salteri, 14 55 species, 2, 14, 24 OpoLus » Dayidsoni, 137 », transversus, 86, 137 Odontocheile - caudata, 93, 131, 166, 177 = minor, 93 Odontopleura, 134 Oeyata angustissima, 32 Buchii, 32 » bullina, 23 » Corndensis, 32 » peltata, 23 » scutatrix, 17 » Sselwynii, 23 OLDHAMIA > antiqua, 1 3 radiata, 2 OLENUS » alatus, 12 » bisuleatus, 12 » cataractes, 7 » cataractes, 11 > comatus, 11 » expansus, 12 » flagellifer, 11 » gibbosus, 7 » humilis, 12 » micrurus, 11 » pecten, 12 > —Plantii, 11 » scarabeeoides, 21 » serratus, 11 » S8pinulosus, 11 3 JSpecies, 7, 115/12 OmpuHyMA, 75 5 Murchisoni, 113 - subturbinata, 113 55 turbinata, 42, 43, 76, 85, 113 Oncuus, 193 » tenuistriatus, 192 Oploscolex, 129 Orbicula, 136 Orbiculoidea, 93, 135, 180 OrTHIS » Actonize, 57, 80 » sequivalyvis, 145 » alternata, 60 » avellana, 59 » biforata, 35, 59, 80, 88, 145 » var. a lynx, 59 » var. B dentatus, 59 » bitforata, 59, 60 », biloba, 57, 80, 95, 144 » Bouchardii, 145 » callactis, 57 » calligramma, 35, 57, 80, 88, 144 Ortuis calligramma, 57 » var. Davidsoni, 144 » ¢alliptycha, 58 » calliptycha, 58 » Carausii,'24 » confinis, 35 » erispa, 58 » elegantula, 35, 59, 89, 95, 145, 168 » elegantula, 59, 61 » fissicostata, 59, 80 » Habellulum, 58 » Jabellulum, 58 » Hicksii, 8 » Lirnantensis, 81 » hybrida, 81, 145 » insularis, 60, 81 » lata, 60 » lenticularis, 14 », Lewisii, 145 » Junata, 181 » Menapize, 24 » occidentalis, 58 » orbicularis, 145, 168 » parva, 59, 81 » parva, 35, 145 » Plicata, 57, 80 » plicata, 57, 80 » poreata, 58, 59, 89, 145 » protensa, 60, 81, 95 » vretrorsistria, 60 » reversa, 81, 88 » rigida, 58 » Yustica, 144 » var. rigida, 144 » var. Walsalliensis, 144 » Sagittifera, 81 » Sarmentosa, 60 » sarmentosa, 58 » simplex, 60 » sinuata, 58 » Spiriferoides, 60 » Striatula, 35, 38 , testudinaria, 61, 81 » tlestudinaria, 58, 60, 61 » turgida, 35, 61 » turgida, 81 » vespertilio, 61, 81 » virgata, 58 » Walsalliensis, 58, 80, 144 ORTHISINA is adscendens, 61 53 Scotica, 61 ORMOcERAS op species, 71 Ormoceras, 158 ORTHOCERAS angulatum, 98, 158, 159, 173, 186 55 annulatum, 71, 90, 98, 158 ” OrTHOCERAS arcuoliratum, 71 ” ” baculiforme, 187 bilineatum, 70 Brightii, 158 bullatum, 159, 186, 192 canaliculatum, 158 centrale, 37 dimidiatum, 98, 158, 173, 187 distans, 159 dulce, 159 filosum, 159, 173 fimbriatum, 158 fluctuatum, 37 Tbex, 71, 158, 173, 186 imbricatum, 187 laqueatum, 98, 159 Ludense, 158 Maclareni, 186 Mocktreense, 158 perelegans, 158, 173, 187 politum, 70 primzevum, 97, 159 sericeum, 18 subannulare, 159 subannulatum, 98, 186 subcostatum, 159 subundulatum, 97, 158, 173 subundulatum, 37, 187 tenui-annulatum, 173, 187 tenui-cinctum, 98, 158, 186 tenui-striatum, 83 torquatum, 187 tracheale, 98, 187, 192 vagans, 70 yentricosum, 98, 159 species, 24, 83, 70,71, 159 ORTHONOTUS, 65 affinis, 183 amygdalinus, 89, 151, 183 var. globulosus, 183 var. retusus, 183 anguliferus, 183 cymbzeformis, 182 decipiens, 96, 183, 191 impressus, 151 nasutus, 65 prora, 183 semisulcatus, 170 semisulcatus, 82, 183 truncatus, 183 undatus, 170, 183 PACHYTHECA ” spheerica, 188 PALHARCA, 66 diagona, 190 elliptica, 191 obtusa, 191 socialis, 24 INDEX. PALMASTER = asperrimus, 47 fi hirundo, 163 55 obtusus, 46 5 Ruthveni, 163 5 squamatus, 47 PALMOCHORDA, 21 PALHOCOMA 7 Marstoni, 163 PaLmocycius x, Fletcheri, 117 5 porpita, 116 sp preeacutus, 84, 117 5 rugosus, 117 Paleopora, 72, 78,74, 103, 104 es Savosa, 72 y interstincta, 29 i; subtubulata, 102 PALASTERINA cs primeeva, 163 PARABOLINA Fy spinulosus, 11 PARADOXIDES Aurora, 6 Dayidis, 6 Harknessi, 2 Harlani, 6 Hicksii, 6 PAscroLus " Goughii, 175 PELTOCARIS x anatina, 93 PELTURA » Scarabeeoides, 11 Pendulocrinus, 118 PENTAMERUS = galeatus, 142, 168 5 globosus, 80, 87, 142 3 Knightii, 142, 167, 168 5 var. Aylesfordii, 168 5, lens, 56, 79, 87 > linguifer, 87, 142 3 liratus, 80, 87, 95 microcamerus, 80, 87, 95 s oblongus, 80, 87 Ss rotundus, 79, 95 es undatus, 80, 87 PERIECHOCRINUS 3 limonium, 121 . moniliformis, 121 ij simplex, 121 * species, 85 PErRAIA » sequisuleata, 43, 75 » bina, 85 » crenulata, 75 » elongata, 43, 75, 85 » rugosa, 43, 75, 85 » subduplicata, 48, 75, 85 201 PerratA uniserialis, 44, 75, 85 ziczac, 43 » Species, 92, 113 Pracops, 51 alifrons, 52 sy apiculatus, 52 caudatus, 86, 93, 132 conophthalmus, 52 corrugatus, 93 5 cuneatus, 93 in Downingive, 93, 131, 166, 177 var. constrictus, 131 é longi-caudatus, 132 var. armiger, 132 a var. Grindrodianus, 132 macroura, 52 .; Musheni, 131 - Nicholsoni, 22 obtusi-caudatus, 78 Stokesii, 76, 86, 93, 131, 166 tuberculato-caudatus, 132 - Weaveri, 86 PHRAGMOCERAS, 159 vequale, 160 arcuatum, 160 intermedium, 174 liratum, 174 pyriforme, 160, 174 yentricosum, 90, 160, 174 Phragmoceras, 70 PHYLLOGRAPTUS ” s angustifolius, 19 PHYLLOPORA ‘ Hisingeri, 45 PISCES, 192, 193 PisocriINnus é ornatus, 128 * pilula, 128 PLANTA, 1, 99, 161, 175, 188, 193 Plasmopora, 103 PLATYCRINUS “p pecten, 122 5 retiarius, 122 * species, 162 PLATYSCHISMA > helicoides, 186, 192 i Williamsi, 191 PLEURORHYNOHUS 55 aequicostatus, 151 PLEUROTOMARIA, 154 ; balteata, 154 7 crenulata, 185 5 Fletcheri, 154 5 lenticularis, 70 x striatissima, 155, 171 ie turrita, 68 a undata, 154, 171 5 uniformis, 155 a species, 33, 83, 96, 154,155 26 202 Pleurotomaria, 68, 70 PLUTONIA Sedgwickii, 2 Ponyzoa, 9, 19, 44, 100, 102, 161, 176 Polyphemopsis, 156 PORAMBONITES os intercedens, 56 Porambonites, 139 Portlockia, 93, 131, 166 Poterioceras =) ellipticum, 160 PRIMITIA 33 buprestis, 7 > McCoyii, 48 var. 48 5 prima, 2 - Solvensis, 7 53 strangulata, 48 9 vexata, 7 species, 21, 31 PROETUS, 133 Fletcheri, 134 latifrons, 134, 165 Rhyckholti, 134 Stokesii, 86, 134 » Species, 78, 86, 133 PROTASTER Miltoni, 164 Petri, 47 Salteri, 46 3 Sedgwickii, 164 PROTOCYSTITES, 3, 46 PROTOSPONGIA ” ” »” ” »” ” ” diffusa, 2 fenestrata, 3 45 flabella, 3 PROTOVIRGULARIA 5 dichotoma, 29 PRUNOCYSTITES > Fletcheri, 127 PSEUDAXINUS, 151 5 securiformis, 169, 183 Pseudo-Crania, 34, 55 PSEUDOCRINITES bifasciatus, 127 magnificus, 127 oblongus, 127 a quadrifasciatus, 127 PSILOCEPHALUS inflatus, 15 innotatus, 15 ” ” PTERASPIS 5 Banksii, 192 PTERINEA asperula, 149 Boydii, 182 Condor, 169 demissa, 89, 150, 182, 190 exasperata, 150 INDEX. PTERINEA Aians, 169 os lineata, 181 x lineata, 181 lineatula, 149, 169, 151 megaloba, 190 planulata, 150 pleuroptera, 65, 169, 182 retroflexa, 89, 150, 169, 181, 190 Sowerbyi, 149, 169, 152 subfaleata, 96, 182 tenuistriata, 96, 150, 170, 182, 190 “9 species, 150 PTERYGOTUS arcuatus, 165 Banksii, 189 bilobus, 179 as gigas, 189 leptodactylus, 164 Bs Ludensis, 193 perornatus, 179 problematicus, 188 species, 179 Prinoprorya, 102 acuta, 45 costellata, 44, 76 dichotoma, 44 explanata, 44, 76 fucoides, 44 lanceolata, 102 Fe scalpellum, 85, 102 Ptychoparia, 5 PrycHOPHYLLUM, 113 patellatum, 114 oy PYRITONEMA = fasciculus, 30 “3 species, 30 Rain-imprints, 2 RaPHISTOMA 5 zequalis, 36, 70, 83 is macromphala, 70 RASTRITES convolutus, 27 5 maximus, 28 6 peregrinus, 27 Retepora, 45, 100 RETIOLITES a Geinitzianus, 92 ReErzra Barrandi, 94, 139 » Bouchardii, 140 » Salteri, 139 » var. Baylei, 140 Rhodocrinus, 123 ” RHYNCHONELLA Bs borealis, 87, 140 ss var. diodonta, 141 3 crispata, 167 cn euneata, 140 RHYNCHONELLA decemplicata, 87, 94 Ay deflexa, 140 s diodonta, 94 - lacunosa, 140 Fe Lewisii, 79, 94, 140 oA nasuta, 56 - navicula, 141, 167 re nucula, 87, 94, 141, 167, 180 a spheerica, 141 s Stricklandii, 94, 141 ms Wilsoni, 141, 167, 180 Ps var. Davidsoni, 141, 180 >) species, 56, 94, 95 SABELLA », Murchisoniana, 164 Saccocaris, 7 Sanguinolites 5s anguliferus, 183 a, decipiens, 183, 191 os inornatus, 96 SARCINULA p organum, 43 Sareinula, 115 ScotecirsEs, 2, 10 ScoLECODERMA Pa antiquissimum, 30 “ species, 21, 129 Scouites, 21 SERPULITES + dispar, 129, 164, 176 fp longissimus, 176 SIPHONOTRETA + angliea, 136 .; anglica, 167 7 micula, 35, 79 SLIMONIA » acuminata, 179 5 punctata, 165 » Species, 179 SPHHREXOCHUS os boops, 50 5 mirus, 131 SPHAERONITES 5 stelluliferus, 45 SPHHROPTHALMDS, 11, 12 SPHHROSPONGIA s hospitalis, 40 Spherospongia, 99, 100 SPIRIFER » erispus, 88, 138 » €leyatus, 88, 138, 180 5 exporrectus, 88, 138 55 octoplicatus, 138 » plicatellus, 88, 138 » var. globosus, 138 » wer. interlineatus, 138 >» var. radiatus, 138 » vradiatus, 138 SPIRIFER subspuria, 130 5 sulcatus, 137 » trapezoidalis, 166 Spirifera 5 biforata, 80, 88, 145 iD cyrt@na, 88, 94 a percrassa, 79, 84 ¥ subspuria, 188 mH trapezoidalis, 88 Spirigerina a marginalis, 94 SPIRORBIS > Lewisii, 93 Lewisii, 164 on tenuis, 164 SPONDYLOBOLUS, 34, 135 ‘5 craniolaris, 34 5 craniolaris, 139 SPoNGARIUM . eequicostatum, 175 Edwardsii, 161, 175 interlineatum, 175 3 interruptum, 175 Sponen, 100 Sponges, 99 ” STAUROCEPHALUS 5 Murchisoni, 50, 131 STELLISPONGIA, 99 STENOPORA » fibrosa, 29, 42, 73, 92, 107, 162, 176 - var. lycoperdon, 42 re var. lycopodites, 176 1 var. regularis, 42, 176 PA granulosa, 107 ramulosa, 29, 42, 73 SrENOTHECA . cornucopize, 8 Strephodes Pa Craigensis, 43 pseudoceratites, 92, 112 or trochiforme, 113 3 vermiculoides, 112 Stricklandinia, 80,87, 95 STROMATOPORA es striatella, 40, 84, 99 Strombodes x diffluens, 115 sa Labechit, 115 ee Murchisoni, 115 o Phillipsti, 115 op plicatum, 114 > typus, 115 7 Wenlockensis, 115 STROPHOMENA alternata, 62 alternata, 62 applanata, 88 antiquata, 61, 82, 88, 147 INDEX. STROPHOMENA arenacea, 88 - bipartita, 63 9 compressa, 88 + compressa, 95 concentrica, 35, 62 corrugata, 62, 147 deltoidea, 62, 88 és deltoidea, 63 Pf depressa, 62, 82, 88, 95, 147, 181 i expansa, 63 + expansa, 35, 62 5 euglypha, 146, 169 5 filosa, 146, 168, 181 © funiculata, 63, 88, 146, 168 3 grandis, 63 Ouralensis, 95, 146 pecten, 63, 88, 146 ptychotis, 62 quadrata, 147 sericea, 82 simulans, 63, 147 tenuistriata, 63 undata, 62 ungula, 62 5 species, 23, 35, 82 SYRINGOPHYLLUM . organum, 115 SYRINGOPORA bifurcata, 111 fascicularis, 111 oh Jiliformis, 111 or reticulata, 111 = serpens, 111 Syringopora, 100 Syrrocrinvs, 119 TAXOCRINUS on granulatus, 126 > marmoratus, 125 5) nanus, 126 Orbigni, 163 simplex, 125 tesseracontadactylus, 125 p tuberculatus, 125 Tellinomya ‘5 linguleecomes, 13 TENTACULITES anglicus, 47, 76, 85 os annulatus, 76 ornatus, 76, 128 striato-costatus, 128 tenuis, 177 TETRAGONIS x, Danbyi, 176 TETRAGRAPSUS bryonoides, 20 crucialis, 20 quadribrachiatus, 20 ” ” ”» ” arata, 16 bijugosa, 16 corrugata, 8 cuspidata, 18 Forbesii, 66, 153, 184 Harknessi, 24 Homfrayi, 8 obtusa, 8 operculata, 16 penultima, 8 reversa, 66 simplex, 17 stiletto, 8 suleata, 17 trilineata, 18 species, 2, 153 THECIA ” ” ” expatiata, 110 Grayana, 110 Swinderniana, 110 Toniaster, 46 Trachyderma, 10 levis, 176 TRACHYDERMA Trap 5 levis, 47 elocera, 134 TREMATIS ” ” ” ” corona, 55 punetata, 55 Siluriana, 135 striata, 180 TREMATOPORA, 100 Treta spis, 50 TRETOCERAS o semipartitum, 192 Tretaspis, 50 TRIARTHRUS, 32 Trinodus ” ” agnostiformis, 48 tardus, 48, 49 TRINUCLEUS concentricus, 49, 78 favus, 31 fimbriatus, 32 Gibbsii, 22 seticornis, 50 TRIPLESIA ” McCoyana, 56 TROCHOCERAS giganteum, 160, 174 spurium, 160 5 species, 98, 160, 174 ” Trochoceras, 70 TRocHOLITES, 71 TROCHONEMA = bijugosa, 156 Trochurus, 50 203 204 TROCHUS > cxlatulus, 97 > Moorei, 83 Trochus » constrictus, 69 Turbo » crebristria, 69 TURRILEPAS fs Ketleyanus, 129 53 Wrightianus, 129 INDEX. Uraster, 163 Urasterella, 46 VERTICILLOPORA * abnornis, 99 VIOA yy prisca, 84, 85 > species, 40, 128 Zethus » atractopyge, 51 » rugosus, 51 » sexcostatus, 51 ZOANTHARIA 5 rugosa, 42, 111 Ps tabulata, 40, 103 ZOOPHYTA, 27, 29, 39, 40, 73, 84, 92, 162, 176 CAMBRIDGE: PRINTED BY ©. J. CLAY, M.A. AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. Royal Quarto, One Volume, with Plates, Cloth, Price One Guinea. A SYNOPSIS OF THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE BRITISH PALAOZOIC ROCKS, BY THE REV. ADAM SEDGWICK, LL.D. F.RS. WOODWARDIAN PROFESSOR, AND FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE. WITH A SYSTEMATIC DESCRIPTION OF THE BRITISH PALAOZOIC FOSSILS IN THE GEOLOGICAL MUSEUM OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE, BY FREDERICK M°COY, F.G.S. PROFESSOR OF THE NATURAL SCIENCES IN THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE. WITH FIGURES OF THE NEW AND IMPERFECTLY KNOWN SPECIES. Cambridge: AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS. > : a : oun oe) (ee 7 ; - , ae te 7% hd ial ; oa. of 2 ay 7 . | . a ty ae is : Tha » in ~ 7 vy R a 7 ih an 7 4 on ; ; ' 4 -; 7 ‘ ad Oe ff ey F . ‘ » " mo apie in Tr \? | 7 ie # , iw eure ; ‘> | i at dag, vee * Stn ’ \ a ba f , re ? 7 ia Ps Ue ie ey a Peat Aube Ny de Pee 2 a Sa ine enero etn innpmonpniommonone owt dooeeonine hey = Senn dt pron obese inane meer ger a ia 2 ae ‘ ~: Sen ey ene is shcrapernth savrisala tie “4 . Piet that he nen) Met