^ J^ ^ ■w^. IMAGE EVALUATION TEST TARGET (MT-?) V. /. , y I I i , .v-^ < p» ASOIDIAN OVA. 168 allowed to remain there for from five to ten minutes, when they were removed and stained with Beale's carmine. In most cases no change occurred, the yolk remaining of its origii.il size, and no "test-cells" or clear spots made their appearance in the yolk, with the exception of one instance, in which I did perceive a number of clear spots in the periphery of the yolk. By these results two questions are suggested: Ist. What are these " test-cells ? " 2d. How are the various phenomena caused by the various reagents to be explained ? I shall give the second question priority. The explanation that seems to me to be the simplest, and that which bears the stamp of probability most dis- tinctly, is, that these phenomena are caused by the varying effects of the different reagents in producing a contraction of the proto- plasm of the yolk. Thus, osmic acid, which "fixes" the proto- plasm immediately, allows of little or no contraction, and hence no "test-cells" appear; with picric acid (which evidently is the con- stituent of the picro-carmine that is active in producing the phe- nomenon) a slight contraction takes place before the protoplasm becomes "fixed," whereby the "test-cells" are formed, but the contraction is not sufficient to cause them to pass outside the yolk; and, in the last place, with acetic acid and sea-water there is no fixing of the protoplasm, and the contraction goes on to such an extent that the "test-cells" are driven completely outside the yolk. Strong evidence in support of this theory is afforded by the variation in the action of picric acid, according to the strength in which it is used. For, as we have seen, in a dilute solution so much contraction of the yolk is produced, that the "test-cells" do partly pass out. ^ • Accordingly, then, the "test-cells" are formed by a contraction of the protoplasm of the egg, and thus we can readily understand their formation in a developing egg, where the contraction pro- duced by the process of cleavage would be quite sufficient to cause their extrusion from the yolk. We are now in a position to discuss the question as to the nature of these " test-cells." Semper ^^^ regards them as merely polar glob- ules, comparing them, in respect to their number, with those of the Mollusca. This theory is, however, untenable, for by the re- searches of Hertwig on the formation of the polar globules in the eggs of Hsemopis, Nephelis,^'"^ Asteracanthion, Mytilus,^"^ and other forms, we know that the polar globules are formed by a true 154 J. PLAYFAIR McMURBICH. cell-division, and arc themselves true cells, containing a nucleus, whereas no such process has been observed during the formation of the "test-cells," and I for my part am sure that it does not ob- tain, and, as Semper himself insists, the "test-cells" are not true cells, but merely "drops." Fol,^**^ too, states that in Phallusia intestinalia polar globules (two in number) are formed after the disappearance of the original nucleus and after the formation of "test-cells." Accordingly then, there is no morphological ho- mology between the polar globules and the "test-cells." In the eggs of certain forms, however, such as, in the Amphibia, Rana,^'"^ and in the Pisces, the Trout,^'^> after the disappearance of the ger- minal vesicle, peculiar bodies are extruded from the yolk without any spindle-formation or cell-division, for which Hertwig proposes the name of excreted bodies (Excretkorper) in contradistinction to the polar globules formed by cell-division. These structures have been supposed by the various authors to be the remains of the ger- minal vesicle, and thus, as far as their mode of formation is con- cerned, probably do not allo\7 of comparison with the "test-cells," but since they resemble these latter in being bodies whose presence in the egg is not necessary to its further development, and since the cause of their appearance is evidently the same, viz : the con- traction of the yolk induced by a stimulus, I think there can be DO objection to classifying the "test-cells" with them as Excret- korper. Wyville Thomson,^'^^ however, has described bodies as occurring in Antedon roaaoeua which bear a closer homology to "test-cells" than even these structures. He says : " Consequently on the con- traction of the yolk, a number of minute spherical pale yellow oil-globule£i are apparently pressed out into the space within the Vitelline membrane." These bodies differ from "test-cells" only in the fact that they are oil-globules, whereas "test-cells" are distinctly protoplasmic in their nature, and contain in their interior several oil-globules usually. This distinction, however, is of com- paratively little moment, and both in their mode of formation and general appearance these Excretkorper — for so they also may be denominated — are evidently closely related to "test-cells" and .perhaps identical with them. I consider these "test-cells" to be simply masses of albuminous material containing two or three granules of the food-yolk, and presume that they are in reality only poriions of the protoplasm A8CIDIAN OVA. 166 of the egg, which have been forced out by the contraction. If an egg, in which the "test-cells" have passed outside the yolk, be subjected to pressure sufficient to rupture the yolk-raembrane, allowing the yolk to come into contact with the "test-cells," and at the same time leaving the egg-shell intact, the "test-celis" commingle completely with the yolk and cannot be distingi^shed again. The granules to be observed in a "test-coll" have a perfect resemblance, both in shape and appearance, to those remaining in the yolk as food, so that it may be presumed that they are in reality the same, and were originally situated in the yolk, in that portion of the protoplasm which formed the " test-cell," and were extruded with it. • The reason why portions of the yolk, originally of use to the embryo, have become useless and are extruded, must remain unde- cided until the life-histories of more of the lower types of Ascidians have been fully worked out, but in all probability the explanation is to be sought for in a change in the life of an ancestral form, whereby the development became more rapid aufl less food-yolk was required, while, at the same time, little or no diminution in the amount of yolk in the egg was produced. TABLE OF REFERENCES. 1. Lacaze-Duthiers. Les ascidies simpler des c6le» de la France. Arch, de zool. exper. Vol. III. 1874. . 2. Semper. Ueher die Entstehung der geschichteten cellulose- epidermis der Ascidien. Arb. aus dem zool.-zoot. Inst, zu Wiirz- burg. Bd. II. 1875. 8. Fol. Sur la formation des ceufs chez les Aacidies. Journ, de Micographie. T. I. 1877. 4. Kowalev/sky. Weitere Studien uber die Entwickelnng der einfachen Ascidien. Arctiiv fur mikr. Anat. Bd. VII. 1870. 5. Kowalewsk). Ueber die Entwickelungsgeschichte von Pyro^ soma. Archiv fur mikr. Anat. Bd. XL 1875. 6. Kupflfer. Die Stammverwandtschaft zwischen Ascidien und Wirbelthieren nach Untersuchungen Uber die Entwichelung der Ascidia canina. Archiv fur mikr. Anat. Bd. VI. 1870. 166 J. PLA7FAIR McMUBRICH. T. Metschinkoff. Zur Entioickelungsgeschichte der einfachen Ascidien. Zeit. fur wissen. Zool. Bd. XXII. 1872. 8. Hertwig. Untersuchungen iiber den Bau und die Entwicke- lung des CelMlosemantels der Tunicaten. Jen. Zeit. VII. 1872. 9. Ussow. Zoologischembryologische Untersuchungen: Die Mantelthiere. Archiv/ur Naturg. Jahrg. XLI. 1875. 10. Hertwig. Beitrdge zur Kennfnias der Bildung, Befruchtung und Theilung des thierischen Eies. 2ter Theil. Morph. Jahrb. Bd. III. 1871 1 1. Hertwig. Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Bildung, Befruchtung und Theilung des thierischen Eies. Ster Theil. Morph. Jahrb. Bd. IV. 1878. 12. Oellachcr. Beitrage zur Entwickelungsgeschichte der Kno- chenfische. Zeit. fur wissen. Zool. Bd. XXII. 1872. 13. Wyville Thomson. On the Embryogeny of Antedon rosaoeus, Jjinck {Oomatula rosacea of Lamarck). Phil. Trans. 1865. i i ». EXPLANATION OF FIGURES. Figure 2 ' drawn with Figure L— Figure 2.— Figure 3.— Figure 4.— Figure 5.— Figure 6.— « Figure 7.— Figure 8.— Figure 9.- is drawn with Hartnack obj. 9, oc. 2; all the rest are Hartnack obj. 7, oc. 2. -Fresh egg of Ascidia amphora. -Pomcle-cell. ^ ' -Egg after short exposure to sea