oO —_— ZS >it mele 4 y J a” 49 a TN wis : ea¢@ f t t ) bd > ‘) Chiat | oy ot <" fina —_ eo Fee es nite th iB ee és IN MEMORY OF A FRIENDSHIP OF MANY YEARS, THIS BOOK Is Affectionately IEnecribed TO THE RIGHT HON. GEORGE YOUNG, P.C. 1885. PREFACE. ; little book is only a sketch of what its Author desired it to be, and he never saw the completed manuscript. Beginning with the fundamental idea that decoration is based upon structure, he saw that this was due to the fact that in the lower, transparent, animals, colour is applied directly to the organs, and that the decoration of opaque animals is carried out on the same principle—the primitive idea being maintained. Where function changes the pattern alters, where function is localized colour is concentrated: and thus the law of emphasis was evolved. Symmetry was a necessary consequence, for like parts were decorated alike, and this symmetry was carried out in detail apparently for the sake of beauty, as in the spiracular markings of many larve. Hence the reason for recognizing the law of repetition. With the developing of these ideas the necessity for recognizing some sort of consciousness even in the lowest forms of life was forced upon the Author, until inherited memory formed part of his scientific faith. This he saw dimly years ago, but only clearly when Mr. 5S. Butler’s remarkable “ Life and Habit” appeared, and he was gratified and strengthened when he found Mr. Romanes adopting that theory in his ‘* Mental Evolution.” The opening chapters are designedly elementary; for the Author had a wise dread of locking intellectual treasures in those unpickable scientific safes of which “the learned” alone hold keys. Only a very small portion of the vast array of facts accumulated has been made use of, and the Author was steadily working through the v1 PREFACE. animal kingdom, seeking exceptions to his laws, but finding none, when death closed his patient and far-seeing eyes. A few days before the end he begged me to finish this abstract, for I had been at his side through all his labours. The work contains his views as clearly as I could express them, though on every page I feel they suffer from want of amplification. But I feared the work might become the expression of my own thoughts, though want of leisure would probably have prevented that unhappy result. Now it is finished, I would fain write it all over again, for methinks between the lines can be seen gleams of brighter light. SYDNEY B. J. SKERTCHLY. CARSHALTON, July 7th, 1886. * .* The coloured illustrations were drawn by Mrs. Skertchly chiefly from nature, and very carefully printed by Messrs. Alabaster, Passmore, and Sons. ——k—— CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTORY . II. INHERITED MEMORY XVI. CONE NLS, INTRODUCTORY SKETCH CoLouR, ITs NATURE AND RECOGNITION THE CoLOUR SENSE SPOTS AND STRIPES COLOURATION IN THE INVERTEBRATA DETAILS OF PROTOZOA DETAILS OF CQ@LENTERATA THE COLOURATION OF INSECTS THE COLOURATION OF INSECTS ARACHNIDA COLOURATION OF INVERTEBRATA COLOURATION OF VERTEBRATA THE COLOURATION OF PLANTS CoNCLUSIONS PAGE Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. Fig. en rank © YD HE S 0 og Sey ee I LIST OF WOODCUTS. —— Part of Secondary Feather of Argus Pheasant. Ditto Wing-feather of ditto. Diagram of Butterfly’s Wing. Python. Tiger’s Skin. Ditto. Tiger’s Head, side view. Ditto, crown. Leopard’s Skin. Ditto. Leopard’s Head, side view. Ditto, crown. Lynx’ Skin. Ditto. Ocelot. Badger. Begonia Leaf. B DESCRIPTION OF PLATES. PLATE I. Kallima Inachus, the Indian Leaf Butterfly. p. 28. Fig. 1. With wings expanded. Fig. 2. Two Butterflies at rest, showing their exact resemblance to dead leaves. This insect affords one of the best examples of protective resemblance. PuATE II. Illustration of mimicry in butterflies. p- 30. Fig. 1. Male of Papilio merope. Fig. 2. Female of ditto mimicking Fig. 3. Fig. 3, Danais niavius. On the African continent both species occur, but in Madagascar D. niavius is wanting, and the female P. merope is coloured like the male. PuaTE III. Fig. 1. Gonepteryx Cleopatra. p. 40. Fig. 2. Gonepteryx rhamni, male. Note.—The orange spot in Fig. 2 has spread over the wing in Fig. 1. Fig. 3. Vanessa Antiopa. Fig. 4. Panopea hirta. Fig. 5. Acrea gea. These two last belong to widely different genera, but are admirable examples of mimicry. PuaTE IV. Fig. 1. Leucophasia Sinapis. p. 42. Fig. 2 Ditto, var. diniensis. Fig. 3. Anthocaris cardamines, male. Fig. 4 Ditto, female. Fig. 5. Anthocaris belemia. Xli PLATEIV. Fig. contd. PLATE V._ Fig. p. 44. DESCRIPTION OF PLATES. 6.