Cate re a ue Au ae 3 og th Pay ‘ey He Le Vay 5 Vie et 0) vi, Netra viv yey ie Lo A Wy Sm tN ry) 3 Poa viee be, eigeth slggifa at YA Ay » pony, ne ‘Uns * Teeny ste lg by Meth aw Cobh eh ree ” MAL Mare eit au Ng rh iF ert atl sntinterc Exe ge BIAS fe g DE r x thy sab bw ee A seue ahem La . cay OOD eens H pA tw eng, can 3 iS ‘ DLink en eae Pee 2 Newt Verity! h sot ak, Aou rr ammy 7: weet? ae toe y (Ache ard » ae ee tree Me Cle ‘ io , Hf POUL eee? Behe La git ave, cm, m sty 8 tee ee Bow « Ut nm etre * Sid te So Oe ie ey at “he ens we Oe ae Pte Fg a tea Mig Wh ae hehe Al at ‘ st ane”, mau OO oy on ry? Sep yg. Ot Eagle ig Ata 47 ip Marne Bile al setae lib ary | Y) he Woods Hole, Mass. | 6 In memory of ; Priscilla Braislin Montgomery _ \ 1874-1956 { Wie of Thomas Harrison Montgomery > Student, th embryology 1897, bird courses 1908 (/ a) in summer courses, 1914 {through 1918 . Asststant Ltbrartan, 1919-1924 Librarian, 1925=1947 These books were purchased by means of afund contributed by friends th apprectation of her Vital part th TheWwoeds Hole scientific ee O €bvOceOO TOEO OU MM [one Tews ve ye wrk Be ATTA vy Me ay ies MAY ate = = Mey i on Mh ACR, AWW, 1X lpi Raney i wat Me] Ye Add Patt is OR a Maney S| RAG ait NM Hila oh h 1) ‘Ai LATA Nk ia, “ COLOURATION IN ANIMALS AND PLANTS. BY THE LATE ALFRED TYLOR, F.G.S. Edited by SYDNEY B. J. SKERTCHLY, F.GS., LATE OF H.M. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, LONDON: PRINTED BY ALABASTER, PASSMORE, AND SONS, FANN STREET, ALDERSGATE STREET, E.C. 1886, IN MEMORY OF A FRIENDSHIP OF MANY YEARS, THIS BOOK IS Affectionately IEnecribey TO THE RIGHT HON. GEORGE YOUNG, P.C. 1885. PREFACE. | ieee little book is only a sketch of what its Author desired it to be, and he never saw the completed manuscript. Beginning with the fundamental idea that decoration is based upon structure, he saw that this was due to the fact that in the lower, transparent, animals, colour is applied directly to the organs, and that the decoration of opaque animals is carried out on the same principle—the primitive idea being maintained. Where function changes the pattern alters, where . function is localized colour is concentrated: and thus the law of emphasis was evolved. Symmetry was a necessary consequence, for like parts were decorated alike, and this symmetry was carried out in detail apparently for the sake of beauty, as in the spiracular markings of many larve. Hence the reason for recognizing the law of repetition. With the developing of these ideas the necessity for recognizing some sort of consciousness even in the lowest forms of life was forced upon the Author, until inherited memory formed part of his scientific faith. This he saw dimly years ago, but only clearly when Mr. 5. Butler’s remarkable “ Life and Habit” appeared, and he was gratified and strengthened when he found Mr. Romanes adopting that theory in his ‘* Mental Evolution.” The opening chapters are designedly elementary ; for the Author had a wise dread of locking intellectual treasures in those unpickable scientific safes of which “the learned” alone hold keys. Only a very small portion of the vast array of facts accumulated has been made use of, and the Author was steadily working through the vi PREFACE. animal kingdom, seeking exceptions to his laws, but finding none, when death closed his patient and far-seeing eyes. A few days before the end he begged me to finish this abstract, for I had been at his side through all his labours. The work contains his views as clearly as I could express them, though on every page I feel they suffer from want of amplification. But I feared the work might become the expression of my own thoughts, though want of leisure would probably have prevented that unhappy result. Now it is finished, I would fain write it all over again, for methinks between the lines can be seen gleams of brighter light. SYDNEY B. J. SKERTCHLY. CARSHALTON, July 17th, 1886. * .* The coloured illustrations were drawn by Mrs. Skertchly chiefly from nature, and very carefully printed by Messrs. Alabaster, Passmore, and Sons. jt CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTORY . II. INHERITED Memory III. IntTRopuctory SKETCH IV. Conour, 1rs NATURE AND RECOGNITION V. Tur Corour SENSE VI. Spors AND STRIPES VII. CoLOURATION IN THE INVERTEBRATA VIII. DETAILS OF PROTOZOA IX. DETAILS OF C@LENTERATA X. THE CoLOURATION OF INSECTS XI. THE COLOURATION OF INSECTS XII. ARACHNIDA XIII. CoLouRATION OF INVERTEBRATA XIV. CoLOURATION OF VERTEBRATA XV. THE COLOURATION OF PLANTS XVI. CONCLUSIONS COW Ee N T's. C33 20 PAGE LIST. OF WOODCUTS. Part of Secondary Feather of Argus Pheasant. Ditto Wing-feather of ditto. Diagram of Butterfly’s Wing. Python. Tiger’s Skin. Ditto. Tiger’s Head, side view. Ditto, | crown. Leopard’s Skin, Ditto. Leopard’s Head, side view. Ditto, crown. Lynx’ Skin. Ditto. Ocelot. Badger. Begonia Leaf. Bb DESCRIPTION OF PLATES. PuatE I. Kallima Inachus, the Indian Leaf Butterfly. p. 28. Fig. 1. With wings expanded. Fig. 2. Two Butterflies at rest, showing their exact resemblance to dead leaves. This insect affords one of the best examples of protective resemblance. PuaTE II. Illustration of mimicry in butterflies. p» 30. Fig. 1. Male of Papilio merope. Fig. 2. Female of ditto mimicking Fig. 3. Fig. 3. Danais niavius. On the African continent both species occur, but in Madagascar D. niavius is wanting, and the female P. merope is coloured like the male. PuatE III. Fig. 1. Gonepteryx Cleopatra. p. 40. Fig. 2. Gonepteryx rhamni, male. Note.—The orange spot in Fig. 2 has spread over the wing in Fig. 1. Fig. 3. Vanessa Antiopa. Fig. 4. Punopea hirta, Fig. 5. Acrea gea. These two last belong to widely different genera, but are admirable examples of mimicry. PuaTE IV. Fig. 1. Leucophasia Sinapis. p. 42. Fig. 2. Ditto, var. diniensis. Fig. 3. Anthocaris cardamines, male. Fig. 4. Ditto, female. Fig. 5.