PRIOa 25 CENTS.

A COMPENDIUM

OF THE WORLD'S

Food Production and Consumption

The Railway The Market Wrecker.

C. WOOD DAVIS.

.\UTHOR OF VARIOUS PAPERS IN THE ' FORaM," "ARENA" AND OTHER PERIODICALS.

I. Food and Population, . . . . .1

II. The Exhaustion of The Arable Lands. "Forum" 10

III. Some Impending Changes, 17

IV. The Farmer in The Coming Change, ... 22

V. An Epitome of The Agricultural Situation, . . 24

VI. Some Surplus Producing States, .... 26

VII. An Open Letter, 29

VIII. The Market "Wrecking Short-Seller— A Menace, . 31

IX. The Farmer, The Investor, and The Railway. "Arena" 37

X. Should The Nation Own The Railways ? "Arena" 49

XI. The (Chicago) Economist's Opinion of Short-Selling, 63

XII. Market Wreckers Prevent an Advance in Values, 65

XIII. Some Phrases of Short-Selling, 67

XIV. Opinions, Professional and Other, of Market Wrecking, 69

XV. The Value of a Trade Journal's Data, ... 72

The thanks of the Public and the Author are due to the manj'
Foreign Officials and American Ministers and Consuls who have
courteously aided in collecting the official data embraced in these
pages, and which gives them such value as they may possess.

PUBLISHED BY THE AUTHOR,
QODDAKD, KANSAS. U. S. A.

EAGLC PRINTING HOUSE, WICHITA. KANSAS.

Copyright, 1891, by C. Wood Davis. All^Ribhts Reserved.

(In preparation and will Issue in I892.)

"THE FOOD SUPPLY."

PRESENT AND FUTURE.

BY

" C- T^7"OOI3 X)-A-TriS.

In which will be reviewed the condition of Agriculture in each (separately) of the
grain-growing countries, official data being tabulated (for each) showing, for a
series of recent years, the acreage devoted to the production of each of the food
staples as well as the production, consumption, exportation and importation of each
staple product and the per capita requirements ; the design being to Include all the
food-bearing areas contributing, materially, to the subsistence of the bread-eating
peoples with the hope that the work can be so thorouphlydone as to render the book
of value to all classes and desirable for reference. To this will be appended such
of the papers of the Author, heretofore published, as appear to have permanent value.

MMi

"A KANSAS RANCH,"

BY

Marie M. and C. Wood Davis.

A ROMANCE OF EARLY KANSAS DAYS.

and showing the methods of railway manipulation and who were

THE manipulators,

Is ID preparation, and will appear early in 1892.

FOOD AND POPULATION.

Since 1870 food has, relatively to population, been more abundant and procurable
at a less expouditure of lalior tlian at ;uiy tinii^ in the history of tlie race, and the absence
of war and the abundance and cheapness of the means of subsistence have, among th«
industrial classes, stimulated marriage with the result of unprecedented additions to the
populations of European blood and the enthusiast, without over-much reflection, haa
assumed that humanity was entering upon an age when neither war, want nor scarcity-
would be known. It is, however, very questionable if this view of the situation is tena-
ble, and investigations— begun some years since by the writer— the results of which are
now embodied in tabulations of official data, as to the relative rates of increase of the
consuming populations and the productive power (as shown by the acreage at the close of
the 7th, 8th and 9th decades) of the fields of the temperate zones render it more than
doubtful as to any prolongation of this period of abundance and cheapness.

That the treatment of this question may partake as little as possible of the specu-
lative and explore only that future, where probable conditions may reasonably be assumed
from those now existaut. it is the purpose to limit the period under review to the eighth
and ninth decades of the nineteenth century I'u 1 extend the prevision no farther than
the close of the first decade of the tweutietji.

Such limitation of the retrospective is rendered necessary by the fact that agricult.
ural statistics are of such recent growth that "looking backward" beyond 1870 would be
venturing into a realm where no reliable data exists.

Under the designations of "bread-eating populations" and "bread-eaters" are
included only the peoples of Europe, the United States, British America, the Cape regions
of South Africa, Australasia, South America south of the tropics, and the colonial
European populations of the islands and tropical regions, the geographical distribution
having been as follows at the close of the last three decades:

1876 1H.S0 1S90

Europe .303 000,000 329,000,000 3fiK 000,000

United States 38,000,000 .50,200,000 G2 .'")(I0,000

Canada 3,000,000..: 4,300,01)0 .5,300,000

Australasia 2,000,000 2,900 000 4,200,000

Temperate South America .5,000 000 6,600.000 8,200.000

South Africa and Islands 6,800,000 7.000,000 7,800,000

Totals 359,000,000 400,000,000 456 000,000

For the reasons stated the aggregate increase of the bread-eating populations and
the rate of increase, during the eighth decade, were greater than ever before known,
necessitating the opening of new sources of food supply, such sources having been mostly
found upon the fertile plains of North America and in newly developed Indian ex]:>ort3
and the supplies from these sources increased so rapidly that in the latter part of the
decade they became excessive, as is clear from the descending scale of prices then obtain-
ing and the fact that the per capita quota of land in wheat increased from .427 of an acre
in 1870 to .443 of an acre in 1880 and this apparently trifling addition — aggregating, how-
ever, 6 400,000 acres — to the acreage quota resulted in unusual aluuidance, great reduction
in the cost of bread and all primary food staples and a proportionate lowering of the
returns of cultivator and laii<llord and showing with what certainty, and to what degrto,
even so trifling a disturbance of the exact and delicate relations existing between produc-
tion and consumption will afTect the price of those things which render civilized life
possible.

The cheapening of the means of subsistence and accompanying peace has, in Eurupe,
been folhwed by an increase in the relative number of marriages and births and at the
same time cheap and more abundant nourishment, coupled with better sanitary eoiidi-
lions, have added to the average duration of life, the result being that the bread-eaters oj

FOOD AND POPULATION.

the world increased, during the eighth decade at the rate of 11.4 per cent., while the
means of subsistence, as measured by the area devoted to the productiou of grain and
potatoes, increased 12 5 per cent., as set forth in the following table:

TUE WORLD'S AREA IN FOOD STAPLES.

Products.

1880

.\cres.

Wheat 15.S,3«2,000,

Bye ' 109,076,000,

~ " 4o.386,000

78,700,000
84,178,000

Acres.

20 Yrs Incr'se

aud Decrease

in Acres

Barley ,

Oits

Miiize, etc.

Potatoes ' 21,7«o,000

177,310,000
10S,34o,000

43,480,0(10;

90,903 000

110. .377,000

23,616,000

Totals I 492,467,000

554,031,000

181,474 000
108,364,000

44,650,000
104,888.000:
127,832,000.

25,839.000,

28,112,000

712,0(l0t

736.000t

26,188,000*

43,654.000*

4.074,000*

593 047,000, l(.i0,580,000t

20 Yr.'!. Incr'se

and Decrease

per cent.

11.8*

1.6t
33 3*
52.0*
18.7*

20. 4t

• indicates Increase and t decrease. tNet increase.

In twenty years we find an increase ot 20.4 percent, in the aggregate acreage of all
food staples as against an increase of 27 per cent, in the bread-eating populations and
taking into consideration only the two principal bread-making grains — wheat and rye —
the increase has been but 10.4 per cent., from which it appears that during the twenty'
years the bread-eaters have increased more than two and a half times as fast as the mate
rial from which bread is made.

During the eighth decade, however, the wheat acreage increased 15.6 per cent, as
against an increase in the consuming element of 11.4 per cent, and the result was an ex.
cessive production of wheat, a part of which was consumed to make up for the diminish-
ing production of rye and the remainder accumulated as a reserve which has sufficed to
tide over later years, when both acreage and current production have been less than
current nte Is.

During the earlier j-ears of the ninth decade the acreage in food staples continued
to increase more rapidly than population, although the rate of such increase was progress-
ively lessening, and about the middle of the decade fell in the rear of the population
rate, which progressed from the 11.4 per cent, of the eighth decade to 14 per cent., the ag"
gregate increase being 56,000,000 as against 41,000,000 of the preceding ten years.

From the foregoing tables it api^ears that while population has, by peace and an
abundant supply of the cheapest food ever known, been stimulated to such an increase
the area devoted to staple food crops has of late, ceased to expand in like proportion and
the acreage, relatively to population, has shrunken to le.ss than that of the earlier years of
the eighth decade, when the bread-making grains bore a price 85 per cent, higher than
that obtaining in 1890.

At the close of the eighth decade the per capita quota of land in wheat was .443 of
an acre, but at the close of the ninth decade the bread-eaters had so increased that the
acreage of wheat, upon which each unit of the population could draw, had diminished to
.898 of an acre, being seven per cent, less than the .427 of an acre quota of 1870, when the
price was 85 per cent, higher. The reasons for this abnormal condition of the supply, as
related to the exceptionally low prices prevailing from 1884 to 1890 inclusive, are to be
<ound in that the world's wheat acreage (as measured by the area per capita in cultivation
during the earlier years of the eighth decade when prices were such as to indicate that
the supply was neither over-abundant nor deficient) was excessive in ISSO by some
6,4(0 000 and had been excessive for some years prior thereto and so continued up toabout
the middle of the ninth decade, such excess gradually disappearing— as population in-
creased without a proportionate increase in wheat acreage — and consumption overtaking
current production, such productiou has since been deficient with the exception of year*
when, as in 1887, the yield has been much above the average.

During the existence of an excessive acreage accumulations of bread-stufl's — large
In the aggregate — were made in mill, warehouse and farm gi-anery. the world over, and in
the years of excessive area the product of one harvest (.ver-lai)ped the succeeding one in
such a way that even two such short (world) crops as those of 1S.S5 and 1886 had no eflect

FOOD AND POPULATION.

in a lv.iaciii? prices, altliou^li they were— reapectively— 59,000,000 and 93,000,000 busliela
below tbo average. Indeed, the price continued to fall, tlie average (gold) price per
bushel lor tlie year (in England) dropping from ifl.OT iu 1SS4 to 99 cents in 1885, and
then to 94 cents in 1880. On the otlier IkukI, when aocumul;«tions have been exhausted,
as after the world, in the Inirvest of 1890, liad garnered a crop 50,000 000 bushels above the
average; so greiit has been the growth of population, so small the increase af acreage and
product and so complete the exhaustion of the reserves that the piice at which the great
crop of 1890 has been sold will average 25 per cent greater than that received for the defi-
cient one of 1889, which was 137 000 000 bushels less but was supplemented by the residue
of the reserves accumulated in the earlier part of the ninth decatle and from the great
crop of 1887, which was the largest ever produced.

From the best data obtainable the world appears to have priniuced, during each of
the past ten years, the quantity of wheat stated in the following table:

YEAR

BUSHELS
OF WHEAT

1881. 1,977 000 OOO

1882 2,263 000,000

1883 2,0-i0,000 000

1884 2,26:!,000,000

1885 2,077,000,000

YEAR

BUSHELS
OF WHKAT

188(i 2 043.000,000

1887 2,2H7,000.000

1888 2,183.0011,000

1889 2 048,000,000

1890 2,185,000,000

Yearly average, 1881 to 1885 inclusive 2.126,000,000 bushels

1886 to 1890 " 2 145,000,000 bushels

" " for the decade 2.130,000.000 bushels

While in the eighth decade the relative increase in wheat acreage and population
was as four is to three the increase in the ninth was in the inverse ratio of one to six.

In the eighth decade the per capita quota of land in wheat increased 3.8 per cent.,
yet in the ninth it diminished 10.2 per cent, and is now 7 per cent, less thun in 1870.

During the eighth decade the area in all food staples— exclusive of the United States
— increased but 9,375,000 acres, being 2.2 per cent., as against an increase in the bread-
eating populations — also exclusive of the United States — ^of 29,400,000, or 9.2 per cent., the
ratio being as one is to four and a half.

During the ninth decade the area in all food staples— exclusive of the United States
— increased but 9,011,000 acres, being 2 per cent., as against an increasein the bread-eating
populations — also exclusive of the United States — of 43,700,000, or 11.1 percent., the ratio
being as one is to five and a half.

During the twenty years from 1870 to 1890 the area in si;aple food products iu the
temperate zones — exclusive of the United States — increased but 18 386,000 acres, being 4.4
per cent., as against an increase in the bread-eaters — also exclusive of the United States —
of 73,100,000 or 22.8 per cent., the ratio being as one is to five.

Including the acreage and population of the United States the world's increase of
area under the staple food crops of the temperate zones has during the last twenty years,
been 100,580 000 acres and the rate of increase 20.4 per cent, as against an increase in the
bread-eating populations of 27 per cent., the ratio beiugasthreeistofour. The aggregates
and per centages of such increase and the acreage quota of eai h unit of the bread-eating
populations at the end of each of three decennial periods have been as shown in the fol-
lowing table:

Year

Bread-Eating
Populations

Increase
Per Cent.

World's Area

In
Food Staples

Aggregate
Increase
in Acres

Increase
Per Cent.

Acreage

Quota

Per Capita

1870

359 000,000!

492,167,000
5)4,031.000
593,047,000

1.37

1880

400,000,000
456,000,000

11.4
14.0
27.0

61,564,000

12.5

1.39

1890

20 yrs. increase

39,016,000: 7.0
100,580,000 ''0.4

1.30

The increase in acreage, during the eighth decade, was one-tenth greater than the
iucrca.se in population and the lesnlt low prices for farm products and a gi'eat. shrinkage
in land values the world ovei'.

During the ninth decade, on the contrary, population increased at a ratedouble that

FOOD AND POPULATION.

obtaining as to acreage iu food staples, the result now being an ascending scale of prices
for farm products, an advance in land values, coming scarcity and a very brisk demand
for farm products,

A most significant fact, made very clear by the forgoing table, is that with a seventh
mor« people to feed the increase in the acreage devoted to food production, during the
ninth decade, was but a little more than half what it was in the eighth, when to have
kept pace with the increase in population it should have been 36 per cent, greater and
there can be no reasonable doubt that but for the acreage iu excess of current needs, exist-
ing at the beginning of the ninth decade, the pinch of scarcity would long since have
been felt.

It is equally significant that the United States has contributed such a very large
proportion to of all recent additions to the world's food producing areas, the extent and
proportions 6f such contributions being made clear in the subjoined table, where is shown
the aggregate of all such additions, the number of acres contributed by the United Slates
and the percentage of the whole so contributed:

Year

1S70

1880

IS'jO...

20 years increase..

World's Area

in
Food Staples

492,467,000
554 031 000
593,047,000

Total Acres ! Acres
Add'd to Area C'nlrib'ted by
in Food St'pl's United Slates

Percentivce
C'ntrib'ted by
United .States

6I,564,000: 52.189,000

39.016 000 29,945,000

100,580,000, S2 134,000

84.7

77.0
81.7

This and the preceding tables show that during the last twenty years the consum-
ing population has increased one-third faster than the products to be consumed but this
disproportionate increase has all occurred in the ninth decade (and the greater part of it
within the last five years), as in the eighth decade the increase in acreage was 12.5 per
cent, as against an increase in population of 11.4 per cent., while in the ninth the proper,
tions have been an increase of 14 per cent, iu the consuming element and but 7 per
cent, iu the area devoted to all food staples.

Of the 100,580,000 acres added to the world's food producing area it is shown in the
last table that no less than 82,000,000, or nearly 82 per cent., must be credited to the United
States and during the 15 years ending with 1885 our additions were quite equal to the
entire added requirements of the world. Since 18S5, however, our additions to the area in
staple crops has been less than half that required to meet the increasing needs of our own
population, hence we have found it necessary to draw the needed supplies from the acreage
heretofore employed in producing food for exportation and the 21 ,00(1,000 acres so employed
in 1885 has now been reduced, by augmenting domestic needs, to 10,000,000 and as we shall
at no remote day. require the entire product of our fields, we may well ask when will
such conditions obtain, how will the world then fare for food and whence can Europe
hope to draw the needed supplies?

In dealing with these problems bread-stufTs will, as in the commercial and agricult-
ural world, be treated as the controlling factor and for this purpose wheat and rye should
be considered as one.

Of the two principal bread-making grains rye constitutes about 38 per cent, and en-
ters iu the proportion of 47 per cent, into the bread consumed iu Europe.

The wheat area of the world, any part of the product of which finds its way into
the channels of commerce, has, during the last decade, produced crops averaging 2,1.36,-
000,000 bushels per annum, the average for the five years ending with 18S5 being 2,126,-
000,000 as against 2,145,000,000 bushels during the last five years, this increase of 19,000,000
bushels being in accord with an increase in area found to be less tha;; 2,000 000 acres
although in the meantime the added requirements of the added bread-eaters have been such
that the producing area, to have kept pace with such needs, should have increased not
less than 13,000,000 acres, and there was a small acreage deficit as early as 1SS5 and the re-
quirements are now such that an average yield, from every acre iu the world devoted to
wheat culture, would give a product fuU.v 100,000.000 bushels less than current needs, and

FOOD AND POPULATION.

this deficit, growingoutofau acreage 10,000,000 to 12,000 000 acres too small for the world's
requirements, is augmenting at the rate of more than 2,000,000aeres yearly, and will so long
as the additions to the world's wheat area are, as of late years, less than 400,000 acres per
annum.

There also exists a very great deficit in the rye acreage, the extent of which it is
difficult to measure, as during the period when wheat was over-abundant and rye grow-
ing relatively scarce wheat was largely substituted for the deficient rye (as is now being
done in Germany and Russia), but we get some idea of this deficit when we as-
certain that in 1870, wheu the per capita quota for the world's bread-eaters was
.427 of an acre of wheat, that of rye was .304 of an acre and is now reduced
to .238 of an acre, the per capita quotji of wheat and rye then being .731 of
«n acre as against .636 of an acre in 1890, the reduction in the per capita acreage — as com-
pared with that of the early part of the eighth decade— of the two grains being .095 of an
acre, or 13 per cent., and indicating a shortage of 43,000,000 acres unless in the meantime
other forms of food have been substituted for the deficient wheat and rye, and such has
doubtless ; been the case to some extent in Russia, and possibly other countries, where
maize, millet and other cheap forms have been substituted, but such substitutions can not
have been considerable, as European production of no one of the food staples has kept
pace with the increase of European population, as is clear from the following table, show-
ing European acreages in the various staples at the end the last three decennial periods
and the aggregates and percentages of increase and decrease:

Products

1870

1880

1890

Increase and
Decrease

Acres.

Increase and
Decrease
Per Cent.

Acres

Acres

Acres

Wheataud SpeltJ

93,989,624
107 827.389
39,392,899
68 008.422
42,682,017
19,947,017

93,190,754
106,440,143
36 380,668
71,417,938
44 244,679
21,196,381

94,445,613
105.876,411
36,009,809
73,608,435
43 928,806
22,664,761

455,989*
l,950,958t
3,383,090t
5,600,013*
1,246,678*
2,717,744*

.49*

1.81t
8.58t
8.24*

Barley

Oats

Maize, etc

2.92*

13.50*

Tola's

371,847.368

372 870,563

376,533,835

Twentv vears net increase..

4,686,000*

1 25*

* Indicates Increase and t decrease. tSpelt Is a variety of wlieat and maslln is rye and wheat sown trgether^
It may be assumed that, for some time, the bread-eating populations will— unless
food becomes exceedingly scarce and high — increase nearly as fast as during the ninth de-
cide, but to be clearly on the safe side, the increase, during the remainder of the century,
will be estimated at 11 per cent, and for the ensuing ten years at 10 per cent., and estimat.
ing that the per capita requirements will equal those of the earlier years of the eighth de-
cade, when the price of bread-stu&s was 85 per cent, greater than in 1890, population and
additional acreage requirements for 1900 and 1910 are estimated at the numbers stated in
the following table:

Year

Estimated

Bread-Eating

Population

Additional Acres

Wheat

Required

Additional Acres

Rye

Required

Additional Acres

Other Staples

Required

Total Additional

Acres

Rciiulred

1900

506 000,000
556,000,900

21,000 000
21,000,000

15,000,000
15,000,000

32 000,000
32,000,000

68,000,000

1910

68,000,000

Totals....

42 000 000

30,000,000

64 000 000

136,0(10,000

Granting the substantial correctness of the preceding estimate, it follows that the
world must, within ten years, add 68,000.000 acres to the food producing areas of the tem-
perate zones, or reduce the standard of living in the same ratio as the added acreage falls
short of the requirements, and must add many — 30 to 40 — millions to make good the ex.
isting deficit in wheat and rye areas. In the next decade another 68,000,000 acres must be
added, hence it is safe to say that during the next twenty years the additions to the acre-
age must be two-thirds greater than during the last twenty, aud such additions, if we are
^o continue the present standard of living, can not be less tha 166,000,000 acres.

c

P^OOD AND POPULATION.

Where is it possible to find such :i quantity of avaihible laud with the populatiom
necessiiry to its culliviUion?

When we reflect that the basis from wliieh we now start to add to the consuming
population is 117 per cent, greater than twenty years since and tliat lliis population is, by
reason of its greater volume and the long prevalence of peace, increasing, in the aggre,
gate, twice as fast as it did thirty years ago, that the augmentalion during the coining
twenty years will be a half greater than the present population of the United States, tliat
their requirements for food are inereasing in like ratio and that the available lauds are
daily becoming less abundant, the tas'< before the generation becomes more plain and its
difficulties such as to address themselves to the thoughtful attention of those who have
been entrusted with the direction of public afTairs, and it were well to take careful ac-
count of the world's resources.

Some will suggest that Providence will care for our welfare and see that the children
of men do not want, while others will advance the theory that the acreage under cultiva-
tion can, by better methods, be made to produce much more; some enthuastic writers
placing the increment from better methods at 100 per cent., but they are evidently not
av/are that changing meteorological conditions are the controlling factors in agricultural
production, nor can they be very well acquainted with the characteristics of the cultivat-
ing class who, timeout of mind, have been proverbial for the reluctance with which they
change processes handed down from father to son. While it is probable that additions to
the acreage yield will result from the adoption of better methods of culture and fertiliza-
tion, yet the improvement in this direction is likely to be so slow as to be hardly apprecia
ble with the passage of a limited number of years.

Others believe that such improved methods will no more than maintain the existing
fertility of the cultivated lands, contending that its original fertility is being rapidly dis-
eipated and instance in proof of such contention the diminishing production of American
fields, as shown in the reports of the Department of Agriculture, and such argument is
not without weight, if but the face of the returns is looked at, as they show average
yields per acre as follows:

Products

Average yield per

Acre 8th Decade

iu Bushels

Averajre yield per

.■Vcre lith Decade

in Bu.shels

Percentages

of

Decrease

27.1
12.4
28.4
22.0
14.1
17.7

24.1
12.1

2fi.6
21.7
11.9

12.8

125

Wheat -^

2.5

Oats

6.8

Barley

1.4

Rye

15.6

Buckwheat

27.6

While there has clearly been a reduction in the acreage yield due to diminishing
fertility, or the bringing under cultivation of lands of lower productive power, this show,
ing is deceptive in as much as the acreage in all crops was, each year of the eighth decade^
greatly understated by the Department, as was made manifest by the census of 1880, when
the departmental returns were found to be some 26,000 000 acres less than the census count,
and such under-estimate necessarily increased the reported product per acre and these
errors, exceed, except iu the case of rye, the last ten years' reduction iu acreage yieldi
thus vitiating all arguments based upon the diminishing yield shown by the Depart-
mental reports without rendering it necessary to resort to the explanation, advanced by
the Departmental statistician, that the diminishing yield was due to a succession of un-
favoralde seasons.

The writer believes that the increased production which will result from the adop-
tion of better methods of culture, in suburban and other favorably located districts, will
no more than compensate for the lessening yield of more remote districts and the con-
stant addition of acres of lower average fertility.

Continued cultivation will lessen the productive power of the soil where the means
or incentive for fertilization are lacking, and this is as true of India as of the United
States, a.9 lands that, in the reign of Akbar, gave an average .yield of 19 bushels of wheat

FOOD AND POPULATION.

jier acre now yiehl Imt 14, the rciUiction being more limn 20 per cent, and due to continued
use without proper fortilizutinn.

An increase in produeiion, due to better metbods, will come so slowl.v as to be of
little avail in relieving necessities tluit will soon be very pressing and to meet the require-
ments of llie near-by years we must depend largely upon an extension of the cultivated
area, hence it is pertinent to enquire where exist available lands, what are their extent,
and can the bread-eating world rely upon development keeping pace with increasing re-
quirements?

Aside from lauds that may be brought into use for pasturage the writer has — in the
Forum for June, 1890, and elswhere— estimated that possibly 35,000,000 acres will, within
twenty years, be added to the area in the United States devoted to the production of sta-
ples, and while otflcials, employed to enquire into the extent of the irrigable lands of the
iirid districts, express the opinion that a great part of the arid areas can be profitably irri-
gated, yet their estimates are so extravagant as to be unworthy a moment's consideration
by one familiar with the arid regions, one such estimate being that 200,000,000 acres of
these wastes are susceptible of Irrigation. The utter recklessness of such an estimate will
be instantly apparent to one who has seen much of the arid area when he reflects that
such areas embrace less than 800,000,000 acres and that this estimate contemplates the re-
clamation of one acre out of four, when it is very doubtful If one acre in thirty can be
irrigated.

If there are 35,000,000 acres which can, after providing for the pasturage of a due
proportion of horses, cattle and sheep, be, within twenty years, brought under the plow
and devoted to the production of food staples our population will have so increased as to
require the product of every such acre, as well as the 10,000,000 now employed in the pro-
duction of food for exportation, as each year's addition to the population will be 1,500,000
or more and consume the product of 4,500,000 acres, and if we are to continue the exporta-
tion of tobacco and cotton, in anything like present proportions, it will be necessary to
add nearly 5,000 000 new acres annually to the plowed fields, and this is more than double
the area now being added if the reports of the Agricultur.il Department are any criterion.

Many suppose that when wheat becomes scarce it will only be necessary to divert
enough of the meadows and corn fields to its production to meet the increased require-
ments, but it would be impossible to conceive a more fallacious idea, as there exists a very
close and delicate relationship between population, consumption and production, and the
moment the proportions of this relationship are disturbed, either by a change in the ratio
of acreage, a reduction or increase of average acreage yield, by reason of more or less
favorable meteorological conditions, or an exacting foreign demand, that moment prices
will oscillate as have those of corn, oats and wheat during the last two years.

As, for several previous years, the corn acreage of 1889 was much in excess of do-
mestic requirements, and the season being exceptionably favorable, the per capita supply
was nearly 35 bushels against requirements — domestic and foreign — of something less
than 30 bushels, and the result was a large surplus with prices sinking to the lowest level
known since the civil war.

In 1890 climatic conditions were the reverse of those of the previous year and the
aggregate out-turn of corn a fourth less, the result being scarcity, high prices and the
sending to the shambles of hecatombs of half-grown cattle and swine that the farmer
lacked the corn to fatten.

The relationship between supply and demand is accurately, if unconciously, adjusted
by the farmer as he devotes his land to such products as bring the best returns and when
the area in any staple is reduced below the needs of the population just so soon the price
of such product will become relatively higher than that by which it has been displaced,
hence when a staple so important as wheat becomes scarce and high in price so will ad-
vance the price of all staples; otherwise all the land would gravitate to the production of
the more profitable one, and yet, while the farmer adjusts his crops to meet a growing or
lessemnir demand for the various staples, the short seller of the Boardl of Trade fixes the
price a-* which such nroducts shall be sold.

8 FOOD AND POPULATION.

The writer is not aware that until within two years an attempt had ever been made
to determine the proportion of land required in each staple for the subsistence of a given
number of people and was led to make tentative coniputatious of acreage requirements
per capita for the purpose of ascertaining what relation the domestic consumption of each
staple bore to the total of land under cultivation, as well as to determine liow soon the
area employed in the production of food for exportation would be required to supply food
for home needs, and has been able to ascertain from the total production during the ninth
decade— less the quantities exported— that the yearly requiremeuts per capita for domestic
consumption have been the product of 1.19 acres of corn, .48 of an acre of wheat, .39 of
an acre of oats, .64 of au acre of hay, .11 of an acre of cotton and .15 of an acre in rye,
barley, bucliwheat, potatoes and tobacco (to which should be added .20 of an acre for the
cotton exported), and such acreage ratios can not be disturbed without afTecting prices;
except as relates to such products as are produced in excess of domestic requirements, and
tlien the price will be subject to change as the relationship of such product, to the whole
bread-oating population, is affected by (he world's supply, largely irrespective of the local
supply, as has so often been the case with wheat.

If, by diverting land to wheat, we should reduce the corn area below 1.19 acres per
capita the price of corn would advance, and should such diversion proceed far, or be long
continued, the price of corn would become relatively much higher tlian that for wheat, as
is now the case in Argentina, where the corn crop having failed wheat and maize are
being sold at the same price per bushel, when the i)arity of prices is about two and a half
to one.

Having a surplus acreage in corn and tlie world's very deficient wlieat acreage as-
iuring a very high price for that grain, it would be wise to divert two or three million
acres of the corn land to wheat for a year or so and thus greatly advance the price of corn,
but such laud must revert to corn not later than 1893 or 1S94 as increasing requirements
are such as to absorb the product of 1,800.000 additional acres of corn each year and the
surplus corn area is now less than 2,000,000 acres.

When this surplus acreage has been absorbed we must yearly trench upon tlie wheat
fields for the needed additions to the corn area, as there is but little new corn laud to be
brought under cultivation and wheat is the ouly staple, other than corn and cotton, of
whieli there is an acreage the product of wliich is exported, and we siiall certainly supply
home needs before attempting to furnish Europe with either bread or meat.

Of 39,000,000 acres in wheat 1,000,000 have, within a year, been taken from the corn
arL-a. and, as in 1895, we shall, for domestic consumption, require the product of butabout
34,1)00,000 acres in wheat and needing to add 1,800,000 acres per year to the corn area, it
would appear that to furnish the needed corn we must, before 1896, have taken from the
wheat area the 5,000,000 surplus acres, hence it does not seem likely that we can export
any part of the .staple products of our fields after 189.5 except cotton and tobacco.

Part of the wheat acreage must be thus diverted or the domestic consumption of all
the other staples be reduced, as the additions to the acreage are so far from meeting the
requirements of current additions to the population that the entire acreage now producing
food for export will have been absorbed by domestic consumption within five years^
hence it follows that the exportation of food must then cease or we must lower the stand-
ard of living.

That tlie arable areas of Europe are very fully occupied is made manifest in the
table showing European crop acreages, and while some increase of the cultivated area
may be expected in Eastern Europe, it is not likely to more than keep p.ace with local re-
quirements. Other than this any material expansion is improbable. Nor can tlie meadows
and other fields be diverted to wheat production without causing a scarcity of products
quite as necessary and which have beeu displacing wlieat in Western Europe, as wheat
would better bear carriage and could bo more readily procured from abroad.

lu .South America are large areas adapted to cereal culture, of which less than
5,000.000 acres are employed in growing wheat, and about the same area in other crops,
the whole of temperate South America having less laud in cultivation than has Nebraska,
and this region will have made quite as much progress as can be expected if thocultivated

FOOD AND POPULATION. 9

»re:i shall have beeu doubled by 1910. as the social, political, fiscal and industrial condi-
tious are such as to ensure tard^' developnsent. This regiou, however, has the distinction
of Ijeing the only one where the area devoted to wheat has during the ninth decade, in-
creased faster than domestic lequirenieuts,

Australasia contains much gOi)d wheat land, a small part of which has been brought
into use, but since ISSO tlie area in wheat has not increased as rapidly as domestic needs,
the acreage, relatively to population, having diminished nearly five percent, and the total
area under cultivation still more.

InsufBcient population and deficient means of transportation preclude a rapid ex.

tension of the Australasian wheat area, but the most potent cause of retardation will

probably be fouud in long term pastoral least's which cover vast tracts of the most desira.

ble lands, which can not be opened for cultivation until these leases expire, heuce there is

little reason to expect much increaseof wheat exportation from Australasia during this

century.

We get a clear conception of the relative importance of Australasian agriculture

when we remember that the total area under cereals and potatoes, in all the seven colonies
is but 5,190,000 acres and is but 37 per cent, of the area devoted to such crops in the State ot
Illinois, and the cultivated area ol the whole southern hemisphere, outside of the tropics,
is less than that of the one State named.

The cereal contributions of India cannot increase and are liliely to diminish
rapidly, as the population is increasing more than one per cent, per annum while the area
under cultivatiun increases not one-third as fast and is not capable of much expansion
while the agricultural population, other than that of Bengal (where the Indian govern-
ment has not the power to increase the land tax owing to a permanent settlement had
in 1793), are constantly in a state of semi-star vation.

The Indian wlieat area has shown no increase in twenty years, and there are
thoughtful citizens of India who anticipate the early cessation of exports from the
necessity of devoting the entire product of the fields to the subsistence of a population
increasing about 3,000,000 yearly, and that requires, even at the miserable Indian stand.
ard of living, the addition of nearly 2,000,000 new acres per annum.

The political, social and industrial conditions environing the populations of Algeria,
Tunis and Morocco preclude any material expansion of wheat culture in Northern
Africa at an early day and similar conditions obtaining in the Asiatic dependencies o'
Turkey, no considerable additions to the wheat supply may be loolied for in that direc-
tion, while in Egypt the culture of wheat is being slowly displaced by that of sugar, cot-
ton and the cheaper foods required by an augmenting population.

Siberia and North s-estern Canada remain as sources of possible supply, yet neither
possesses the requisite population for an early increase of wheat production on a scale at
all commensurate with the world's pressing needs.

There seems no doubt, however, that in Siberia is an immense area suited tocoloniza-
ti.in and the production of cereals, but political apd social conditions, as well as the tenure
of the land, are such as to render it quite probable that it will not soon become an outlet
for the swarming European populations, other than those of Russia and the develop.
n:ent will be so slow as to afford little hope as to the supplies from this source beingof tha
nquired volume.

It is contended that there exists in Northwestern Canada an extensive region
adapted to the profitable culture of cereals. While the fertility of much of this region ig
o- questionable it is practically unoccujiied, without the means of trauspi>itation and ita
adaptation to wheat culture still but liypothetical, as there has been, over the most of thia
■vide area, no such contiuued culture as to dispel reasonable doubts (arising from its geo-
jraphical situation) as to the summer lieats being ordinarily sutBcient to rijien wheat.
But for this doubt we might say that, when occupieil. Northwestern Canada would add
materially to the world's supply of bread, but existing conditions, as to population and
transportation, are such that no material relief from the scarcity now impending, lay
reason of the existing and prospective deficient wheat and rye acreage of the world, can
be hoped for from this source as time is such an important element in the problem. A

10 FOOD AND POPULATION.

hungry man can not wait for his breakfast until an unoccupied region can be peopled and
its lands subdued, and to-day the world is not only short in bread-stuff by reason of defi-
cient acreage, but the great disaster which has befallen the growing crops of Europe,
coupled with the deficient acreage, render it reasonably certain that the yield of the
world's wheat and rye fields in IfiiU will be le^is than current needs liy hundreils of millions
of bushels and that the last vestige of the reserves, aecumulated during the e.\isten<e of a
surplus acreage, will have disappeared and an unpleasant void still remain, and this con-
dition should ensure very high prices for our products, and once the pinch is felt in con-
sequence of the exhaustion of the reserves, prices should, and will, remain high while
the acre;ige deficit exists, and that it will long exist is assured by the scarcity of available
lands in the termperate zones.

THE EXHAUSTION OF THE AEABLE LANDS.

Nearly twenty years since, Gen. W. B. Hazen pointed out the approaching ex-
haustion of the arable lands of the United States, and was sharply criticised for certain
statements as to the aridity and unfitness for agriculture of the lands west of the 100th
meridian. Time and repeated attempts to subject such lands to cultivation have shown
the correctness of Gen. Hazeu's statements and conclusions. A little more than a score
of years since, Iowa, Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska and the Dakotas constituted a vast dis-
trict but sparsely settled, the area then in cultivation in those States being but little more
than seven million acres; now, however, by the opening of new farms and the develop-
ment of older ones, the area in staple crops (in such States) is much more than one-fourth
of all the lands in the United States so employed. With such an area of the most fertile
soils in the process of development it is not strange that Gen. Hazeu's views were looked
upon as pessimistic; yet their correctness can no longer be questioned.

The writer has recently shown that the existing depression in agriculture is
due, in part, to an excessive development of these fertile districts; that agriculture and
all related industries can be prosperous only wheu consumption balances production; and
that an early equilibratiou is assured by the growing scarcity of tillable lands. Investi-
gations, undertaken solely with the view of ascertaining why the farmer was not
prosperous, led irresistably to the conclusion that the rapid increase of the cultivated area
in the United States was one of the causes of the lack of prosperity among the farmers of
Canada and Europe, as well as of the United States, and that the great reduction in the
yearly accretions to such cultivated acreage was a sure presage of the early coming of
the time when the farmer will be prosperous. Further investigations have developed the
fact tliat the arable lands are being occupied at a rate which insures their complete ex-
haustion at a much earlier date than has heretofore been deemed possible, with rapid
reduction in the volume of exportable breadstutl's, and an entire and not remote cessiifion
of such exports, probably to be followed by our entering the markets of the world for a
portion of the wheat required for domestic consumption.

To understand the situation clearly, it is best to resort to tabular statements show-
ing the increase in cultivated acres in diflerent districts during designated periods, the
rate of increase in each district in such periods, the aggregate of the additions to the cul-
tivated acreage in each period, the yearly average of such additions for each perioil, the
percentages o^ such increase for each period as well as the yearly average of such percent,
ages, and a comparison of the periodical rate of increase of acreage with that of popula-
tion. This is shown in the following table:

THE EXHAUSTION OF THE ARABLE LANDS.

11

s

<

2
a

•6881 Ol I s<tr

t-; s: — « -1< 00

i^ CD C-i 00 ^ o

00

f-H

CD
1-i

0

^2=2 § g

lO cd" :r^ - r c^ i>

Ol o o -

O
O

O

o"
o

55

i

o

CD

CO
CJ

o"

CO

S

>
3

o

gs-noj.^uj jo

CO f « t*- CC CO

o c-i iO ci — ^

r-^ -T ^ (>1 cr;

C-J
CI

CI

CJ

o
a"

^ ■>! Tt< CO CO :o
(>j O :c »o I- O
OJ -^ 1- 05 O CO

^"rfcooT oT of

CO — ' lO r- .-. CD
CC J5_C; r-t IC CO

CD

cd"

1-

g

o

CJ

55

o

o

o"
o

o

40

CD
CO

00
CO

<3

<

■a
2

d

■ >

o

6i8' 01 fifl

OSBajDUI JO

sasuiuaajo^i

CO CM ^ CO l> CD
lO cf 'Tii lo o\ o
tri C-) 00 ■<*< CO c-J

o
ci

CI

00

s.
g

a
5

oo r^05 o CO

O — CD lO O t^
0_ ^105-^1^ 0_ CO

O iC CO :C "O o
CC O CO lO C-I lO
lO r^ -f X" ^ ^"
<M T^ so -f

S3

I— 1

o

CD
1— 1

00
lO

oo"

CI

CD

8

o

CD
00

o

<

2
1

9SHSJDUI pnE
,0S«3JD3a JO

O O CO lO "M GO

t-^ C75 .-^ -^ Oi oi
« ^ iC '-' 00

* ^

cq

CO

03

ci

s,

2

02

^ 05 ^ CO CD ^
O — CC "Xi I~ -^
CI ^ 00 -- CO^ CI

lo" r-^ 00 gT c-f CO

en; i^ (X; -tT 1-- CO
O fM CO CO C-l t'

o t^x CO c<r

Cq CC^ CO

CD

«

CI

f-»

8

o

CD

a-j
t^
cf

I--

■^

CJ

cj"

Cultivated

Area In

Staple Crops

1867

05 ^H 00 C5 Ci O
1- -^ C^l "^ lO O
CD M Oi C 1^ -rr O

CD"^3i'io" ccT O

O CO - 1 c^l CO r-

CJ CO ^ ■— ( c^ c:i

C4 CO C^l

CD
CJ
lO
CO-

-r

CC

■^'

o

o

CD*

£5

O C: ^ 00 O OO
CO O lO -:»* -^ CD O
CO^CO_M_Oi_ 0_ ^CD
co'^'oTTf" 1^ -rjT^
CO C30 CO 05 "^ CD 00

t^ ::o'"-f'cf CO cd"-^
1— O t^ CI »o o -v
I-. ri CI U3 o c^

i

1

•3

s
o

o

4-

c

oi

: >

is
: >

: 'i-

h3i

a
X

a ^ S

3 4; C

>

2

a

s

-S

a

>

e
c

03
>

■=

c

i

c3 cj □

HI

Hi

— ^ o p, rt

O S cS cn

0) >. o a 01
> c^ OS OS w

<

li

"3

IS

1— I

h3

a

3
O m

« o

n

s:

©■aj:

-as

^

- --e a

o

^S«

"a

•=« a

Tl

°5

V C4

cS

a«

.a*

rt

Ti-a

a a

0

rt ca

a =8

•^jjj

c a

rt

OJO

s

>2;

s

•H«

«i 0

Ci

•ss

f

"rtl

ca

hS

;?i

§

H

rt

*->

>

<

\-o

£^i

%

i£

5^

J

^

The preceding exhibit, covering twenty-two years of greatest expansion in American
agriculture, is divided into four periods, the lirst being seven years and eacli of the others
five. In the seven-year period, population is found to have increased 18.2 per cent, and
the cultivated area 20.2 per cent.; the drafts upon the arable lauds, in the shape of addi.
tiuus to the acreage in staple crops, amounting to 2,724,177 acres per annum, and

12 THE EXHAUSTION OF THE ARABLE LANDS.

aggregating 19,069,238 acres. During the second peroid — five years — population increased
14.2 per cent, and the area in cultivation 42 per cent., the average annual additions to th»
cultivated area being no less shan 9, .525, 710 acres, and aggregating 47,628.548 acres. The
third period shows population increasing a trifle more than 12 per cent., cultivated acres
21.2 per cent., and an average annual addition to the area in staple crops of 6,841,661 acres;
the aggregate reaching 34,208,307, which was still out of proportion to the increase in
population. During the five years ending in 1889, the rate at which population increased
was somewhat less than in the preceding periods, but the rate of increase in cultivated
acres was reduced to 8.1 per cent., being but 1.6 per cent, per annum; the average annual
increment of the cultivated area shringiug to 3,150,276 acres — little more than half the
normal requirements— and clearly showing the rapid diminution of the arable lands.

Although the population was 12.200,000 greater in 1889 than ten years earlier, and
the desire for farms just as keen as ever, yet in the last five years, with fully a fourth
more people desirous of becoming owners of farms, the number of acres added to the cul-
tivated area was but one-third as great as during the five years ending in 1879; being in
the latter period 15,750,000 acres, as against 47,628,000 acres in the earlier one; whereas,
had the increase in acreage been in the same ratio to population as in the earlier period,
such additions would have reached a total of 60,000,000 acres. The land hunger being
quite as sharp now as in the eighth decade, it is evident that there is a lack of the means
of gratifying it.

The foregoing table and the partial analysis following enable us to see the progress
of agricultural development and the occupation and gradual diminution of the arable
areas in the several districts. They help to a clearer appreciation of the effects of such
rapid development upon the agricultural and other Interests and indicate plainly that
the existing depression is, in part, due to an increase in cultivated acres out of all propor-
tion to the synchronous increase in population, at the same time suggesting the inquiryi
Wliere can be found the arable lands to satisfy the land-hungry home-seekers now ready
to settle, in countless swarms, upon any fraction of an Indian reservation that is at al*
likely to be thrown open to settlement?

The unoccupied area in the North Atlantic group covers some 7,500,000 acres. It
lies mostly in the Aroostook and Adirondack regions, and is almost wholly unfit for cul-
tivation being either rough and mountainous, swampy, or heavily timbered, with soils
of very low fertilit3', of which but a small fraction can be brought under cultivation. In
Michigan, Wisconsin and Minnesota are tracts aggregating some 10 000,000 acres which
are valuable only for the forest growths above and the minerals below the surface. These
lauds will add but little to the cultivated acreage.

Such portions of Texas, Kansas. Nebraska and the Dakotas as lie west of the 100th
meridian have generally been included among the arable areas, and it has been esteemed
an act of treason for a citizen of any one of those States to maintain that only such parts
of this vast tract as are susceptible of irrigation can rightfully be so designated. This
Immense plains area, covering as well large parts of New Mexico, Colorado, Wyoming
and Montana, is at best but a pastoral region, in which repeated attempts have been made
to reduce the lands to cultivation. Successive armies of settlers have invaded these
desiccated plains, but after expending their means and suffering deplorable hardsliips,
have found it necessary to abandon land and improvements. This is the area from which
arises that perennial cry for aid, as it is also the land from which a refluent wave of pop-
ulation moves eastward with as much regularity as the return of Autumn.

Much of the soil being fairly fertile, these plains offer no obstacles to settlement and
cultivation, except such as are found in the climate; that presents the same peculiarities
of aridity, extreme variations in temperature and excessive evaporation found in the
elevated regions of Central Asia. It is true that near the eastern borders of this tract fine
crops are occasionally grown, but only in years when the rainfall is exceptionally great
and the dreaded simoom fails to wither vegetation. Such exceptional seasons, however,
are but "a snare and a delusion," inducing men to waste their energies and means in
abortive attempts to cultivate these arid soils. Occasionally thearid features of theclimat©

THE EXHAUSTION OF THE ARABLE LANDS. 1$

of the plains are projected several deo-rces eastward, sometimes reaching Missouri and
Arltansas, with disastrous results to the husbandman.

Could water for irrigation be ol)tained, much of the plains region could be made
productive; but most of the streams penetrating it are even now yearly drained dry by
irrigating canals, which supply water to irrigate l)Ut the smallest fraction of tliese im-
mense areas During the seasons of 18S7, 18S8, 188!) and 1890 (aud nearl> every year of
late), many miles of sucli canals remained dry during the entire Summer, owing to the
complete appropriation of the water by canals opening from such streams nearer their
source. In seasons of excessive droutli and delicic^iit snowfall the water available is
lessened one-half or more; hence irrigation from the water (lowing in such streams has
about reached its limit. This is notably true of the Platte, Arkansas, Cimarron and Rio
Grande.

Many schemes have been proposed for utilizing the water said to flow below the
sand in the valleys, but snch projects involve immense outlays, are as yet unfruitful, aud,
it is generally believed, will long remain so. .Should such plans, however, ultimately
prove successful, the resulting supply would suflice to irrigate but an inconsiderable frac-
tion of the arid lands, being rarely applicable outside the immediate vicinity of the
streams.

Extending from the Gulf to far north of the Canadian bouudary, aud from the
vicinity of the lOOtli meridian to the Eocky Mountains, the plains embrace an area of
hundreds of milltous of acres, of which probably one-fourth, with sulBcient water for
irrigation, could be made productive; but under existing conditions it is very doubtful
if three per cent, should be included under the term arable, aud such arable part is nearly
or quite all occupied, even though a part of it is unimproved.

Lying west of the plains is the still mOre arid region of the mountaiu ranges and
plateaus, where are found numerous fertile valleys, mostly of limited extent, which,
when not at too great an elevation, and when supplied with water for irrigation, are very
productive; yet in such favored localities occur seasous of excessive drouth, wheu the sup-
ply of water (resulting mostly from melting snow) proves wholly inadequate for the
limited acreage under cultivation, as was the casein Nevada, Utah, and other arid dis-
tricts in 1887, 1888, 1889 and 1890.

The regions where irrigation is a condition precedent to successful agriculture in-
clude an area of some 784,000,000 acres, of which, owing to scarcity of water and laclc of
soil, not more than five per cent, is susceptible of cultivation; and there is no satisfactory
evidence that water can be obtained to irrigate the half of five per coot. The construc-
tion of extensive irrigation works necessitates the expenditure of much money and takes
long periods of time, and few of those now living will see the completion of such works
as will be required to irrigate the 30,000.000 acres of arid lands which the Public Land
Commission estimates as irrigable from existing supplies of water.

In adopting the estimate of the Public Land Commission, that but 30,000,000 acres
of the arid lands are irrigable from the available supply of water, I am not unmindfulof the
fact that such estimate couflicts with tliat recently made public by Major Powell* (who
was a member of the Public Land Commission) namely, that "there are nearly 1,000,-
000,000 acres of these arid lands in the United States, of which nearly 120,000,000 acres
can be irrigated when all such waters are used."

I am unable to accept such an estimate for many reasons, one of which is found in
the fact that the arid areas include something less than 800,000,000 acres, or less than 80
per cent of the 1,000,000,000 acres named by Major Powell.

Nearly or quite all those familiar with the arid regions consider the estimate of the
Commission, that one acre in twenty is susceptible of irrigation, quite as high as the facts
warrant; and it should be borne in mind that most of the arid lands which could be
easily and cheaply irrigated have already been brought under the plow, yet less than one
per cent, of the area is in cultivation.

Before any considerable additions can be made to the irrigated lauds extensive
♦"Century Magazine.'' Muicli, 1890.

14 THE EXHAUSTION OF THE ARABLE LANDS.

surveys* must be made; existiiiR eliiims, water rights, ami titles— inchoate and complete
— extinguished; national and State laws fornnilated and enacted tluit will harmonize or
extinguish conflicting national, State, municipal, corporate and individual Interests; and
then extensive and costly works constructed — all of which will consume much time. In
the interim, population and consumption will have outrun production, the small remain-
der of the unoccupied non-irrigable arable lands will have disappeared, and such portions
of the arid districts as can be brought under the plow will be needed to meet the urgent
wants of an ever increasing consuming element.

The processes and progress of agricultural development in prairie regions where
rains are ordinarily sutHcieut, and in mountain districts where arable lauds, susceptible of
irrigation, exist only in tracts of small extent, differ most radically, as is evident wlien
the progress made in Nebraska and Kansas is contrasted with that made in Colorado and
Utah. Utah has been settled more than forty years; Colorado, Nebraska and. Kansas
from thirty to thirty-five years. In 1888, Colorado bad 5'i0,000 acres employed in growing
staple crops; Utah, 396,000; Nebraska, 8,141,000; and Kansas 10,552,000; the cultivated
area in Kansas being twelve times that of Colorado and Utah. Had any considerable
part of the lands of the mountain districts been arable and susceptible of irrigation, they
would long since have been seized upon for farms by the great army of the landless.

The uneultivable character of the lauds of plain and mountain <listricts. and the
rajiid diminution of the unoccupied arable soils of the United States, have been clearly
shown by the events following the opening to settlement of the limited and not over-fertile
Oklahoma country, :vhen men who had failed to find satisfactory locations in California,
Oregon and Washington retraced their steps, hoping to secure land upon which to found
a home, only to find in advance of them an army of would-be settlers large enough to
occupy a territory ten times the size of Oklahoma. Similar scenes have more recently
been enacted upon the opening of a part of the Sioux reservation, where a Itmd-hungry
myriad, in the depth of a Dakota Winter, contended for the possession of lauds wholly
within the belt where the farmer must strive with drouth and a soil below the average in
fertility.

While I write, an army of settlers is camped along the southern Kansas border,
Impatiently waiting a proclamation from the President— which may not come for many
mouths — opening to settlement thegood, bad and indiflerent lands of the Cherokee Outlet;
which body of land will probably furnish some 20,000 fair to good farms of IGO acres each,
and a like number that will not pay for cultivation; the remaining 16,000 quarter sections
being fit only for pasturage, and much of it of little worth for that purpose. These
Btateuients will not be chalenged bj' tho.se familiar with that country, unless they are en-
gaged in "booming" the district in question.

In California, as well as in the States of the Missouri valley, there is much laud ye'
unoccupied, mostly in the possession of corporations and individuals who are holding It
for Henry George's "unearned increment." These lands are likely to be brought into
cultivation very tardily, and in such a manner as to add but little to the area in grain
crops, as they will no more than replace lands diverted from cereal culture to pasture and
meadow — a diversion necessitated by the constantly increasing number of animals kept.

In Oregon and Washington are great unoccupied areas. Such portions of these
unoccupied lauds as lie east of the Cascade Mountains — say two-thirds of each State-
possess many of the characteristics of other mountain districts. Such small portions of
western Oregon and Washington as are without timber have long been occupied, while
the remainder of these fertile districts is so heavily timbered as to render such lands uu-
uvailable as a source of food supply during this century.

Far at the southeast, in Florida, is found an immense unoccupied area — some 12,-
000,000 acres or more — but this region is a land of sand-barrens, impassible swamps, dense
forests and everglades, little of which is fit for human habitation. Long as Florida has
been .settled, and though by reason of possessing the ad vantages of a. semi-tropical climate
it has become the Winter abode of so many well-to-do people, it shows but little agricult*-

•Major Powell proposes four different surveys - topographic, li.vdrocrapliic, engineering aod geo-
lo^flcal — wliich will certainly require several decades to complete, and which will cost vast suDia.

THE EXHAUSTION OF THE ARABLE LANDS. 15

ur:il liovelopiueut doubtless Ijpeause of the sterility ami uncultivable character of a ^reat
part of the laiicU. The result is that, aside fmiu tlie area ejiiploycd iu growing; fruits ;ind
vegetables, less tliau three per cent, of the surface of the Stale is iu eultivatiou. With
Buch a showing, it is clear that Florida will niaUe no material additions, at an early day,
to the area employed in growing staple emits.

Scattered through the southern States are many unoccupied tracts; but of thei-e
only a small part can be designated as arable, for much of such laud is swamp, moun-
taiu or subject to overflow; this being especially true of such remnants of the public
domain as are still to be found iu the southern districts. Still we are likely to see some
extension of the cultivated area iu southern States, more especially io Arkansas and
Texas; there lieiug in those States much unimproved land iucluded in farms which will
hereafter be reduced to eultivalion and used, largely, to augment the world's supply of
cotton.

In the Indian Territory is found the only large body of fairly fertile lands yet to be
brought into cultivation. The area of that Territory is 44,481,000 acres, the eastern two-
thirds of which possess a soil of average fertility, while the remaiuder is much below the
average. The peculiar climatic conditions of the arid plains are frequently pjojecled over
the western portion, reudej'iug mixed farming but a precarious means of subsistence.
Various tracts in the Territory will be opened to settlement from time to time as the
Indian titles are extinguished; but it will be mostly in the western and by far the poorer
part, for the eastern and better soils will for a long time remain in the possession of the
Indians and "squaw men." The Indian and his white son-in-law and tenant now culti-
vate much laud (possibly 500,000 to 1,000,000 acres), of which, as early as 1880, a large
proportion was iu cotton. Within the last year, 10,000 bales of cotton were shipped from
one station. Although the products of the Indian Territory, for reasons known only tc
the Departmental barnacles, are not included in the reports of the Department of Agri-
culture, yet they enter into consumption aud make some additions to the marketable
suri)lus; and this acreage will in time appear in the reports probably as currentadditions
to the area in staple crops.

The foregoing table and text afTord a reasonable basis for an estimate of the landi
that can be added to the cultivated area within a given period, say during this decade.
But before proceeding to make such estimate, it may be well to inquire what the Publio
Laud Commission bad to say on this subject iu its report for 1880, wlierein it was esti-
mated, June 30, 1879 "that (exclusive of certain lands iu the southern States) of lands
over which the survey and disposition laws had been extended, lying in the West, the
United States did not own, of arable agricultural lands which could be cultivated without
Irrigation or other artificial appliances, more than the area of the State of Ohio, viz;
25.000,000 acres "

"Of the public domain then remaining the Commission made the following estimatei

Timber lauds 85,000 Ono acres.

Coal lands (to be largely increased by better classification o, 529, 000 "

Mineral lands (subject to a large increase by new discoveries) 64,800,000 "

Arable lands in northern States and Territories 17,800,0('0 "

Lauds in southern States surveyed and unsurveyed 25,589 000 "

Irrigable lands, being the lands which can lie irrigated from the present

supply of water 30,000 000 "

The remaiuder pasturage, gi i/.ing, desert, and all other lands useless
for agricultural pmp. - 's by reason of altitude or lack of water or
soil, including lemaiuder of lands likely to be segregated for pri-
vate land grants still unsatisfied, and Indian and military reserva-
tions, including also unsurveyed area of the Indian Territory,

viz: 17,150,250 acres .' 565,701,222 " "

An analysis of this estimate will show that of the public domain unoccupied iu
1880, there were then some lOi) 000,000 acres which might be included under the designa-
tion .'iruble. and made up as follows:
17,800,000 acres of arable lauds in northern .States and Territories.
7,000,000 " in southern States.
80,000 000 " of irrigable lands.
17,000,000 " in Indian Territory.
28,000,000 " of surrendered railway grants, and Indian and military leservatious.

100.800.000 acres total.

16 THE EXHAUSTION OF THE ARABLE LANDS.

Since ISSO, more than 60,000,000 acres of these lands have been occupied and largely
Orought into use, and the only unoccupied remainder of any moment is found in the
lands of the Indian Territory, and in that portion of the widely scattered irrigable lauds
yet unsettled, the available total of which cannot exceed 40,000,000 acres, and is probably
much less; and these lands are so conditioned that development must be slow. To these
40.000 000 acres may be added an indefinite quantity of railway, school, college and State
lauds, much of which is wholly unfit for cultivation. Estimatingwith extreme liberality,
ihe arable portion of these lands may be put at 30,000,000 acres; then, adding 30,000 000
icres more as the undeveloped arable lands novc constituting parts of farms, or yet uu-
jccupied lands owned by individuals, we have a possible total of 100,000,000 acres yet to
oe brought into use, equivalent to 650,000 farms of 160 acres each.

Of the farm areas included in the census of 1880, thirty-five per cent, was in wood-
and, thirty-one per cent was employed in growing staple crops, and the remainder was
in minor crops, or reekcnied as farm yards, pasturage and unused waste laud. It is prob-
iblo that the proportion employed in growing staple crops has risen to one-third; and we
may assume that thirty-five per cent, will be the maximum jjroportiou of the new farm
areas added from the possible 100,000,000 acres that w-ill be devoted to the production of
staple crops, thus increasing the productive power some 16.6 per cent. Such increase is
likely to be less, rather than more than one-sixth, for no inconsiderable part of these
lauds is even now included in farms, and will come under the plow very slowly, if at all
Being uow largely in u.se for grazing farm animals; and the requirements for that purpose
ire constantly increasing. It is also well to remember that 100.000,000 acres, the available
trable area still remaining, is the sum of estimates liberal in the extreme, and that in New
Mexico and Arizona alleged Spanish and Mexican grants are likel.y for a long time to
retard development. According to the ascertained per capita requirements the existing
cultivated area is suflfieient for nearly 67,000,000 people, and with an addition of one-sixth
we have a potential supply of cultivated acres sutfleient for a population of 77,000,000.
which number will probably be reached in 1900 with an annual increase of but 2.2 per
cent.; but not till many .years after 1900 will all these lands be brought into production.
Could 35 per cent, of 100,000,000 acres be at once reduced to cultivation, the added acreage
in staple crops would barely furnish supplies for such additions as will be made to tlie
population within seven years.

It has long been a favorite boast that American agriculture could feed the world;
but a critical examination of its further possible development brings us face to face with
a state of affairs suspected only by the few, and shows plainly that long before the close
of this century the increase in population and the inevitable exhaustion of the arable
soils will necessitate one of two things, namel.y, the adoption, on the part of the great
mass of the people, of a less liberal standard of living or tlio importation of food. Prob-
ably the ability to support a greater population will come from a report, in some measure,
to the first of these alternatives.

The average American, ambitious and somewliat extravagant in his mode of living,
(vill be reluctant to reduce the standard, and only the enhanced cost of indispensibles
«'ill impel him thereto.

B.v the adoption of a more economical way of living, and by the increased produc-
tion which may follow improved culture, the per capita requirements can probably be
reduced from 3.16 acres to 3 acres, when the land now iu cultivation and that which can be
brought into cultivation will sustain a population of 82,000,000— a number that will prob-
ably be reached soon after the close of the century— while two, three or four decades will
doubtless be required to bring the remnants of the arable areas into production.

This seems the more probable iu view of the fact that the average rate of increase in
cultivated acres during the last five years has been but 1.6 per cent, per annum, as agaiui-t
8.4 per cent, ten years earlier, and that it must grow less and less continuously, by reason
of the constant shrinkage iu the quantity of arable lauds sub.jcct to draft; hence it would
be a most liberal estimate to place such increase, during the remainder of the century, at
an average of three-fourths of one per cent, per annum, which would, in 1900, make the
cultivated area devoted to staple crops some 226,000,000 acres, or sufficient, at 3.16 acret

THE EXHAUSTION OF THE ARABLE LANDS. 17

per capita, for a population of 71,500,000 (and at 3 acres per cnpita, for a popiilntion of
75,300,000), with the possibility of aildiug from 15 000,000 to 20,000,000 acres more in the
earlier decades of the twentieth century. This, however, is an extremely liberal estimate,
while a reasonably cautious one would put the rate of increase in cultivated area, during
the remainder of the century, at one-third the rale obtaining since 1884. or an average of
one-half ot one per cent, per annum. That would in ten years augment the cultivated
irea by 10,500,000 acres maUing an aggregate of some 221,500,000 acres, or sufficient, at
J. 16 acres per capita, to meet the requirements of 70,000,000 people, and at 3 acres per
japita, of 74,000,000, which is probably as large a population as our fields can provide for
during this century.

In view of the progressively rapid reduction in the rate of increase, and the con-
stantly diminishing quantity of unoccupied arable laud to draw from, an addition of
10,500,000 acres of cultivated land seems to be quite as much as can be expected in this
decade. During the remainder tf this century, the annual increase in consumption will
necessitate average yearly additions of 16,000,000 acres to farm areas, of which nearly one-
third must be land actually producing staple crops. With but 100,000,000 arable acres to
draw from, of which a considerable part is already included in farms, there would appear
to be little dilticulty in determining the maxinjum time that will elapse before the ex-
haustion of the material from which new farms can be carved in numbers sufficient to
meet the requirements of the increasing population, and after which consumption must,
as in Europe, be met from the products of a given and practically unexpanding area sup-
plemented by an importation of food. ^

— e-^~iS5£j^fe.25'Tr-t —

SOME IMPENDING CHANGES.

When we reflect that the prime factor In the unexampled prosperity of the United
States and our comparative freedom from many of the social and economic problems
long confronting Europe, has been the existence of an almost unlimited area of fertile land
to which the unemployed could freely resort; that, practically, such lands are now fully
occupied, and that such occupancy has occasioned a sudden halt in the westward move-
ment of population at the line found to be the extreme western limit of profitable agri-
culture, it may be well to inquire what changes are likely to result from the exhaustion
of the tillable portion of the public domain.

That settlement and cultivation, more or less complete, have overrun and occupied
all the tillable lands, with the exception of small tracts held for higher prices, is shown
by the reversal of the current of population which, for three or four years has been
moving e:istward from the great plains lying at the base of the Rocky Mountains, after
the units constituting this army of returning settlers have each spent years in futile efiorta
to extort the means of subsistence from a soil lacliing only moisture to render it fruitful.

Year following year the crops have failed, and the settler.* upon these arid wastes,
after exhausting their limited means, have, in a majority of cases, been forced to abandon
their lands and improvements, representing a life's savings Such experiences have prob-
ably been necessary in order to demonstrate the exhaustion of the arable lands.

It is the more or less complete rfiminatiou of this factor in the prosperity of the
country which is the presage of rapid and far-reaching changes in the social, economic,
industrial &nd political relations of the people. Heretofore, when the invention of a
labor-saving device threw numbers of men out of employment, a portion, especially of
'vhe more thrifty, resorted to the public domain, from which they proceeded to carve a
farm, or bought the farms of others contemDlatioe removal to the public domain, in oi

18 SOME IMPENDING CHANGES.

ciises, found eiiiploynieiit in one of the many channels constantly being opened for labor
In the iiiiprovenient of the new States.

Weary of the city and its hopeless struggles, thousands were yearly resorting to the
public d<)nKiin while other thousands, unable speedily to encompass their desiifs in tliis
direction, still hope that industry ;itu1 economy will yet enable them to secure a home in
the liniitle.-^s West, and %vill not realize that there are no more free lands worth owning
until they have made such costly and fruitless experiments as have the people now
marching eastward from the arid plains.

To the capitalist, the settlement and development of the new Stales has presented
an invitinjr field, and here have been laid the foundations of many of the great fortunes
which excite the wonder and astonishment of Europeans. In this undeveloped region
the capitalist and speculator have found a new field for exploitation, possessing, in
latent form, wonderful mineral, woodland and agricultural resources and fast filling with
a restless race of workers ami consumers, and a vast territory without railways, factories
or mines, the construction or development of which promised and furnished profitable
employment to an immense capital.

Here the railway projector and builder found ample opportunities for fame and
fortune; the mine operator, rich mines of coal, and all the useful and precious metals;
the moneylender, men in almost countless numl)ers, ready to pay high rates for the
means enabling them to buy this piece of property or improve that, to erect mills and
factories, open and equip farms, build cities and bridge streams, until tlie West became,
for the eastern owner of capital, a veritable Pactolian stream, and western farm mortgages
were esteemed the best of gilt edged securities.

Now, however, all this is about to change — is changing. Tlic investor in railway
securities cannot much longer invest all his surplus income in the bonds and shares of
of new Hues, as little new mileage will be either needed or built outside of the Southern
and Pacific States; towns will expand, but few new ones will be built; new factories and
forges will rise, and new mines be opened, but local capital \yill largely be employed in
such enterpiises and to those interested in railway securities the change means a lessened
rate of income, fewer opportunities for profitable investment in new lines, the old lines
largely double tracked, new and more commodious equipment, better methods of admin-
istration, less manipulation for the exclusive benefit of those active in the management
and greater efforts to serve the public, and thereby evade the restraining arm of the law.

For the owners of buildings it means lower rentals, continuous improvements in
order to keep the property up to an advancing standard and a rate of income shrinking
as does the rate of interest.

The implication for the manufacturer is a broader and more exacting home market
— as the farmer, receiving for his products from 50 to 100 per cent, more than now, will
become a vastly more liberal and discriminating buyer — for his wares, which must be
sold at a lower price, oflset l)y lower interest charges and relatively cheaper raw materials
of foreign origin, and, if the manufacturer is to furnish employment to all who seek to
enter his service, it indicates a search for distant markets and a sharp competition with
Europe for the trade of other continents. To the possessor of loanable funds it means a
constant shifting of investments to inclined planes where the returns will, by reason of a
constantly increasing competition from an augmenting supply of capital seeking invest-
ment, continuously diminish, and a probable restriction of choice in investments, the
proportion of borrowers being likely to lessen.

That the West is, even now, in large part emancipated from monetary dependence
upon the East, was made manifest during the flurries of last Autumn in the money mar-
kets of New York, Boston and Philadelphia, when the western exchanges pursued the
even tenor of their way, with but little oscillation in rates, and with loans about as
readily procurable as usual.

Producing so largely of the useful and precious metals, and with an advance of 50
to 100 per cent, in the price of the agricultural staples so indispensable to human life, and
which are so largely grown in tlie Mississipiji valley, the West will soon receive immense
accessions of capital, and — as one of the results of tlie exhaustion of the arable portion of

SOME IMPENDING CHANGES. 19

the piihlio (U)riiaiii — is like to become Ibe cretiitor sectiou at a very early day. Moreover
the products of manulacture cousuiued by the western people will, with no more farui8
to open by the increasing population, be from year to year more and more the out-turn of
western establishments.

The farmer, while eng:ged in opening and equipping his farm, with prices often on
a parity with or below the cost of production, has been forced to become a borrower, and
after paying interest and taxes, has had barely the necesaities of life. Now, however,
with the relative niimlier of his competitors yearly le.ssening, both at home and abroad,
belter prices obtaining, with an assurance — arising from an increase in the population
out of proportion to any possible iucre.Tse in the area under cultivation— that well within
ten years sucli prices will double, there is every reason to believe that lie will cease to be
a debtor.

Without the possibility of the further material expansion of the cultivated area,
will come a restriction of new enterprises, fewer chances to make great fortunes, and a
steadier and more settled social life for the comfortable classes; and although for a time
the young man may not find the difficulties attending a start in life seriously increased,
yet with the next generation the way will, as a rule, be open only to him who has wealth
or social influence at his command. In other words, we shall jilace the same value upon
such influences, and find the opportunities for a career to depend on much the same con-
ditions as now obtain in Western Europe.

For the artisan and laborer the impending change points, in the near-by years, to a
brisker demand for bis services, as the farmer becomes a more liberal buyer and builder.

To the farmer the exhaustion of the arable lands will bring changes most desirable.
Not competing with the whole world for glutted foreign markets, the demand for his
products will be steadier, and being quite sufficient to absorb all his commodities and
divest the option dealer of much of his pernicious power over prices, which will for years
advance steadily, as demand will soon and progressively outrun production, thus enabling
him to discharge bis debts; to build better houses, barns and granaries; provide more and
better furniture and clothing, and, where it exists, to gratify a love for books and works
of art, and to surround his family with the comforts and many of the elegancies of life
now enjoyed by other classes, but which a meagre income has placed beyond his reacli.

It means tliat the coming generation of farmers will labor less, read and think
more and to better puipose, and many of the sons and daughters be educated at the higher
seats of learning, and thus be enabled to take a creditable part in the world's work, and
that all the brightest sons of the country side will not desert the farm, as it will promise
something beyond a life of unrequited toil.

By the invention of labor-saving devices, and their use on farms sufficiently large
to warrant the purchase of a full line of improved implements, one man is now able to
produce three times as much as forty years ago, and nearly twice as much as twenty
years since, and although there seems little reason to expect in future as great reduction
in the labor involved in the production of staple crops, it is altogether probable that such
further mechanical improvements will be made as will enable a force equal to that now
employed on the farms to cnllivate all the land which will be in use in 1910; hence there
will be a constant movement of population from farm to town, the rural population aug-
menting only in so far as that great uunjbers of working proprietors will, at no remote
day, be able to and will employ laborers to till their fields. With a birth-rate quite as
great as that obtaining with the urban population the rural districts will contribute not
less than 75 per cent, of their increase from births— 6,000,000 before 1910— to the town pop-
ulation, necessitating a constant widening of the markets for American manufactures.

After the middle of the tenth decade we need not be solicitous about a market for
farm products, and treaties providing for the free entry of foreign commodities in con-
sideration of the free entry into other countries of the products of American farms will
need revision in the interest of American manufactures not later than 189-5, as we shall
then have only such agricultural staples as cotton, tobacco and, possibly, meats for export.

Careful computations have been made of the probable increase of population and
the area likely to Ije in cultivation at the end of each quinquennial period up to and in-

20 SOME IMPENDING CHANGES.

eluding lillO, adopting lower rates of iucrease, in population, especirdly after 1895 — thau
are geneially current, it being assumed that the number of immigrants will gradually
diminish from natural causes and restrictive legislation, and that as the ditliculties at.
tending I he maintenance of a family increase marriage will occur later in life and smaller
families result. On the other hand, in estimating the increase in the area likely to be
under cultivation, the rates adopted are higher than the great scarcity of tillable land and
the rates of increase — progressively lessening — obtaining in recent periods warrant, it
being deemed best to maUe this estimate so libeial that if there be error it shall take the
form of a larger area than is likely to be in cultivation.*

Estimates of the area required for domestic con-umption are based upon the mean
of population and the area under such crop during the last ten years, as reported by the
Department of Agriculture, after deducting from such area the proportion employed in
growing that part of the crop exported and the acreage per capita quota stated is that
found necessary to produce only so much of the staple farm products as is required for
home consumption except in the matter of cotton and tobacco, which it is assumed we
shall continue to export long after we find it necessary to import food, as the cotton lands
are, as a rule, but poor wheat lands, and the commercial world will long be unable to dis-
pense with American cotton, the price of which will advance as do the prices for other
agricultural staples; hence southern fields will continue to bring the most satisfactory
returns while devoted to cotton growing.

Eliminating the doubtful factors from the computations, it is found that the popu-
lation will, in 1895, probably reach 70,000,000, each unit requiring 3.16 cultivated acres to
provide the staple food products, provender and materials for manufacture consumed at
home, and permit the exportation of the same proportion of cotton and tobacco as now,
the aggregate requirements being 221,200,000 acres as against the 220.000,000 which it is
estimated will then be in cultivation, the deficit amounting to 1,200,000 acres and indi-
cating the importation of food.

At the close of the century population will probably have increased to 77,000,000,
and, consumption continuing at the same rate percapitaas now, weshall need the product
of 243,000 000 acres; and with but 226,000,000 in cultivation, the neceesity for the importa-
tion of fond will long have been imperative.

Ten years later it is estinuited that population will have increased to 90,Q00,000, the
area in cultivation to 234 000 000 acres and the requirements to 284,000,000— the dficit
reaching 50,000,000 acres, or 18 per cent., and necessitating the importation of nearly one-
fifth the food and provender consumed, or a proportionate lowering of the standard of
living.

During the twenty years which will be required to add 27,000,000 to our population
that of Europe will probably increase 70.000,000, that of the La Plata countries 4,000,000,
and that of Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and other European colonic 9
fully 10,000,000; so that by 1910 the wheat-eating populations of European blood will have
increased at least 100,000,000, requiring an addition to the world's supply of rj e and wheat
of no less than 700,000,000 bushels, of which about 450,000,000 bushels should be wheat.

It is barely possible that in twenty years the European product may increase 30,-
000,000 bushels that of North America 50,000,000, that of South America 30,000,000, that
of Australasia 20.000,000, and that of India, Persia, etc., 20.000,000, making a possible total
Increase in product of 150,000,000 bushels as against an increase in requirements three and
a half times as great. Any increase whatever, either in the United States, Europe or
India, is more than doubtful, as the European area emplojed in growing wheat and rye
has shown no expansion during the last twenty years; the lands of India are fully occu-
pied and the miserably nourished population ever pressing with increasing weight upon
inadequate means of subsistence, and in the United States the wheat area is no greater
now than in 1880. Moreover, the lands of Europe are so fully occupied as to preclude an
increa.se in cereal production except in Russia and the Danuoian countries, and any in-
creiise of the cereal area in Eastern Europe will be more than oflset by the continued
conversion of grain fields to the growth of other necessary products in Western Europe-
products that will not bear transportation as well as grain.

•See "Exhibit 1" of the "Epitome of tiie Agricultural Situation" following page 24,

SOME IMPENDING CHANGES. 21

In the United States we must, in order to secure any i>?rnianent increase in the
wlieat urea, unduly diminisli tlie area in staples just as essential and even more difUcult
to iniporl, altluiugli the iniiiortatioii of an adequate supjily of wheat does not promise to
be au easy task, as supplies — throughout the world— are certain to be so short as to ensure
an eager scramble among the buying nations — including all Kurope west and south of
Hungary — and still leave an unsatisfactory deficit.

Such will be some of the results following the exhaustion of the arable portion of
the public domain of the United States, accompanied by much higher prices for the agri-
cultural products of temperate climates, a great world-wide and enduring advance in the
value of lands in the temperate zones susceptible of profitable cultivation, and the un-
exam|)led prosperity of the landlord and cultivating proprietor.

Of late years the returns of the American farmer and the European cultivator have
been but little more than sufficient to attbrd a meagre subsistence; but granting the ap-
proximate correctness of tlie estimates made, it is inevitable that the relations of supply
and demand should, in the immediate future, undergo such radical changes as to cause
prices to advance stendily and rapidly to fifty, one hundred and po-isibly two hundred
per cent, above tlie level now obtaining; and such adv.nice, liowever great it may prove
to be, will be so much added to the landlord's rentand thecultivator'si^rofit. As present
prices cover the cost of production, and sucli cost is far more likely to diminisii than aug-
ment, the .idvauce in the price of farm products will accurately measure the ad"
vance in the value of land. Hence if the returns now cover the cost of production
witli wheat selling at 90 cents per bushel and the average yield twelve bushels per acre,
■when it shall sell for ^l.SO per bushel the returns will have increased by $10.80 per acre,
and assuming that only one-lialf the farm will be so employed as to make such net returns
and that money— twenty years hence — will, on real estate security, loan at three and one-
half per cent, we find the value of such lauds to be quite ».].50 per acre and equaling the
value reached by the lands of Prance jirior to the great shrinkage in value occasioned by
the low prices for farm products prevailing In recent years. On this basis, should the
farms and gardens of the United States, in 1910, cover au area of 7.50.000,000 acres (includ-
ing pasture, wcmdl ind and waste), as is altogether probable, their value, exclusive of the
live stock and inii)lements. will reach the enormous sum of $112, .500, 000, 000 and their
owners will, with the owners of other real estate, form a great lauded interest which, in
its magnitude, will long exceed and overshadow all others and with an influence far more
pronounced than now, although their numbers will be proportionate less, make for stead-
iness, peace and order in social industrial and political life.

Tne converse of tliis class is likely to be found in the ranks of labor increasing more
rapidly than other of the social elements by reason of the continuance, for some years, of
immigration, of an inability to make further drafts from the ranks of labor to the liublic
lands, and the advance of land values precluding the purchase, by this class, of as many
improved farms as heretofore, and by large accessions from a rural population that, un-
able to open new farms, increases four or five times as fast as rural employments, and
which must in the absence of railway construction and forests to be felled, of necessity
swell prodigiously the increasing myriads seeding employment in mine, factory and forge.

Adding to an industrial population, now nearly sufficient to supply all the warej
Imported, three-fourths the increase of the rural districts, we shall, before 1910, in this
manner alone, swell the urban population by more than 0,000,000; or, in other words, of a
total iucrea.'e of 27.000,000 during the next twenty years, fully 25,000,000 will be found,
witb other 40 000.000, in mine, village, town and city.

To employ these people our rulers must, in the absence of the safety-valve hereto-
fore existing in the public domain, find means of opening distant markets which shall
absorb the labor of this vast force multiplied by the progressive improvement and em-
ployment of machinery which each year will bring.

Europe has long confronted a somewhat similar .state of afTairs, with the very im-
portant diftereuce, however, that America has been able to furnish sufficieut grain and
meat to keep the price of food at a much lower level than seems longer possible.

22 SOME IMPENDING CHANGES.

la 1910, with an urban population of 65,000,000, it may be necessary, in order to
employ such an enormous force, to adopt such a fiscal policy as will ensure the free entry
of all materials euteriug into manufactures which we are unable to produce, and to so levy
imposts as in no measure to lessen Durability to compete with Europe for the trade of
the world, and thus postpone, to the latest possible day, that social condition necessitating
emigration to South America, Australia or Africa.

THE FARMER IN THE COMING CHANGE.

Twenty years since, wherever the cultivator owned the land he occupied he was
esceptioually prosperous and so continued to be until about the middle of the eighth de-
cade, when the opening of so many new.farms in the Missouri valley and t!;e divc'lopment
of Indian wheat exportation so changed the relations of supply and demand for food
products that prices fell greatly and the farmer's revenue, from a given area, was nuuh
lessened; yet it is more than questionable if this lowering of the price of food has rtsuUed
beneficially to the industrial classes, although it has enabled them to buy their food for
less money, yet probably such food has, because of the disastrous change in the farmer's
condition, actually cost them more labor than it would had prices remained at the level
obtaining during the first half of the eighth decade, when the price (in gold) of Eiiglisli
grown wheat, in the markets of Great Britain, was 85 per cent, greater than the price
obtaining in the same markets in the year 1890, as the changed conditions surrounding
the employment of the capital and labor of the farmer have, in a very large measure, de-
stroyed the purchasing power of the most numerous class of thecustomersof the merchant,
manufacturer, artisan and laborer.

The agricultural population of the United States number some 25,000,000 and is
forty per cent, of the whole and when the purchasing power of such a great proportion
of the peopfe has been destroyed or greatly diminished it means lessened employment for
others, lower wages as well as a lessened purchasing power on the part of all the indus-
trial classes, more or less commercial stagnation, hard times, a descending scale of land
and other values and increased indebtedness on the part of the producing classes, whose
wares are selling at or below the cost of production. This has long been the case with a
very considerable part, if not the whole, of the agricultural class and has resulted in less
power to purchase the products of the labor of others, who, in turn, have thereby had
their purchasing power diminished so that the whole economic fabric has been subjected
to unprofitable conditions which have aflected all classes alilie, if in varying degrees.

In the case of the American, as well as all other farmers, the reduction in his re-
turns has been abnormally great, as the prices of farm products — as measured by the price
of wheat — were 85 per cent, greater during the first half of the eighth decade than those
obtaining during the year just closed, and this change in price very accurately measures
the change in his purchasing power and the result is that he wears last year's coat, buj'*
little or no hardware, puts up few or no new buildings, makes the old buggy last another
year, the daughter has to do without the promised musical instrument, the son cannot
secure the expected education and the makers of hardware, coats, books, pictures, organs,
pianos, furniture and carriages and teachers, transporters, merchants, jewelers, professional
men and artisans are but half employed, and find it more difficult to buy flour made from
seventy-flve cent wheat than they would if wheat h>d never sold below $1.50 per bushel.

This state of affairs has, however, under the conditions which have existed in this
country, probably been inevitable, and while many such auxiliary causes as the unrea-
sonable exactions of the transportation companies and the far-reaching and baleful prac-

THE FARMER IN THE COMING CHANGE.

23

tices of the Board of Trade gambler in farm products have been largely contributory, the
primary and potent cause lies deep down in that desire of the race to own a home and to
Bit, each man, under his own vine and fig tree which has found such wide scope for its
realization on the public domain, where all were welcome to a farm without money or
price; and this, in the absence of a retarding forest growth, resulted in an increase of 112
percent, in the cultivated area of the United States during the fourteen years ending
with 188.5, while population increased but 44 jier cent.

During the last half decade, however, a radical and far-reaching change has obtained
— obtained because the raw material from which farms are made has been practically ex-
hausted—and while population continues to increase in nearly as great a ratio as prior to
1885, or 12..5 per cent., the cultivated area increased but seven per cent., and the rate of
the acreage increase is yearly and progressively lessening, one consequence being that the
quantity of land employed in the production of food for exportation has diminislied from
21,000,000 acres in 1885 to 10,000,000 acres in 1891, and continuing to diminish at the same
rate will, by 1895, have wholly been absorbed by the requirements of our added population.

The following table shows the rapidity of agricultural development and the pro-
gressively decreasing rate at which additions are being made to the cultivated area and
indicates the early coming of that time when the American, and especially western,
farmer will be the most prosperous member of the community:

EXHIBIT SHOWING INCREASE OF CULTIVATED AREA IN THE UNITED STATES AND THE

RATES PER CENT. OF INCREASE.

1871

Cultivated Area in Staple,

Crops, Acres [ 93,000,000

Increase of Cultivated Area

in Each Period Acres '

Rate per cent, of Increase

in Each Period.

Increase of Cultivated Area

Each Year during Each

Period, Acres 1

Yearly Rate per cent, of In-j

crease during Each Per'dl

1875

123,000,000

30,000,000

32.2

7,500,000
8.1

1880

165 000,000

42,000,000

34.1

8,240,000
6.8

1885

197 000,000

32,000,000

19.4

6,400,000
3.9

1890

211,000,000

14,000,000

7.1

2,800.000
1.4

The preceding table shows that during the fourteen year period ending with 1885
the increase in cultivated acres was not less than 112 per cent, as against an increase in
population of 44 per cent. This phenomenal increase was not only sufficient to meet the
requirements of the great additions made to our own population, but also quite stiffieien^
to meet the additions made to the European populations and still leave a surplus to be
stored as reserves, which have been drawn upon in later years when current production
has been less than curreut needs. Now, however, our additions to the area under culti-
vation are less than equal to half our added needs

Concurrently with the addition of so many new farms in the United States the
Indian government abrogated the export duty upon wheat and Indian exports that ag-
gregated but 464,000 bushels in 1871 rose, in 1S87, to 41,500,000 bushels without, howeveri
any increase of the Indian W'lieat area; indeed the area sown to wheat at the close of the
ninth decade was a million acres less than in 1870, the augmented exports being very
largely due to the increasing and inconceivable poverty of the Indian cultivator who has
been ol)liged to sell an ever increasing proportion of his crop — as the price fell — to paj' the
constantly augmenting land (rent) tax, although a population increasing three times as
fast as the cultivated acreage actually required this food for home consumption.

The result of such a disproportionate increase of population and cultivated acreage
in the United States and the compulsory exportation of wheat by the starving Indian
ryots is seen in the fact that whereas, during the five years ending with 1875 the average
price (in gold) of Eugli-h grown wheat in the markets of Great Britain was $1.64 per
bushel, it was but 95 cents during the five years ending with 1890. In other w<irds wheat
— Tvhio'.i is the key to the agricultural situation — during this fifteen years shrank in

24 THE FARMER IN THE COMING CHANGE.

selling price, in consequence of the opening of so many American farms and the de-
velopment of Indian exports, no less than 69 cents per bushel, and the price of all other
primary staple food products have sbniiikeii in like proportion. Is it any wonder that
times are hard and st;ifj;natiou every wheie \v lien the fountiiin has been dried at its source?

The price of wheat having l)een 73 per cent, greater for the five years ending in
1875 than during the last five years, it follows thpt the purchasing power of the farmer
has been lessened in nearly like measure, although ;here has been some little reduction in
the cost of production. Add again this proportion to the purchasing powfT of the im-
mense agricultural class of the United States and every artisan, laborer, mvner, manu-
facturer, transporter, builder and professional man will be fully employed, wages good
and the whole industrial life be quickened in an astonishing manner. It is almost
impossible to comeive that such a change is impending after the experiences of recent
years, when the farmer has seen, notwithstanding all his industry and privation, the
debt, with its annual interest charges, yearly increasing. That such a change is impend-
ing and is susceptible of proof, as data exists, and but requires the labor and patience
necessary to its gathering and tabulation, to show that there is a deficient acreage as well
as a most direct relationship between population, acreage in staple food products, prices
for such products and the prosperity of the cultivator, as well as the prosperity of all
other classes, as there can be no doubt that all the industrial forces are just as dependent
upon and just as intimately connected with, the properity of the basic industry as in
that remote past when the founder of the second Persian monarchy said: "Tliere can be
no power without an army; noarmy without money, and no money without a prosperous
agriculture." In the view of this most successful statesman the farmer was the ultimate
source of all wealth, as well as power, and to see thiit such is still the case we have only
to watch the stock markets and observe how values rise and fall as the crops are full or
meagre.

Many things have changed since the days of Artaxerxes. and industrial processes
differ wonderfully, but the great underlying principles have not changed, and when the
basic industry is in an unprosperous condition there will be but little money moving,
and that little movingslowly through the arteries of industrial and commercial life, while
the body politic will be in just the state we have spen during the period when the acreage
devoted to the production of food inciensed more rapidly than the consuming population.
Now, however, the condition of the farmer is changing for the better more rapidly than
his affairs changed for the worse during the eighth and ninth decades.

Wheat production may be said to be the controlling factor in acreage distribution,
as well in production, as the product is at all times and everywhere saleable at some price
and it is the one product that the farmers of the temperate zone rely most upon to furnish
the needed money. This is no less true of Russia than of Australasia; no less true of the
United States than of India, and the result is that of the area now employed, in
America, in producing food for exportation about eighty per cent thereof is devoted to
the production of wheat.

During the eighth decade the wheat acreage of the world increased (in round
numbers) 24,000,000 acres, or 15.6 per cent., and treating the compulsory exports of India
as being equivalent to an addition of acreage, the additions to the supplies of the bread-
eating populations of European blood was, during that decade, equal to the product of
27,000,000 acres, and the ascertained average yield per acre would give a yearly out-turn
of 320,000,000 bushels; which, at 4.75 bushels per capita, was tqual to the requirements of
67,000,000 people, while the bread-eating populations increased 41,000,000, so that had rye
kept pace with the increase in the rye consuming part of the bread-eating world there
would have been, at the end of the eighth decade, a surplus wheat acreage equal to the
requirements of 26,000 000 people.

Assuming that the wheat acreage twenty years since — when prices were 73 per
cent, greater than in 1890 -was sufficient to meet the requirements of the then existing
population we And the acreage, at the beginning of the ninth decade (treating the recently
developed Indian exports as an increase of available acreage equal to the production
of a like number of bushels), was some 9,500,000 acres in excess of requirements, and

25

". . (being
,,»' added

' jppiyi

/ , out of

'V blood
" "' serves
^^' urplua

ai

,TT,Ud the
J n, and

"I'll adda

' 'dly be

/ have

urplus
juance
8 great
iusted-
md as
itional
uid for
ion in-
50,000,-
e must
lly add
Q years

s have
jorting
onlj' in
staples
jtatoes,

rtOi^t.

an one-
)on the
abroad,
. of the
ih more

«0<:..

domain

ition ot

export

00,000,-

er food

ices, as

ud the

iu con-

luce of

ill uot

iixteen

ive his

es; Ilia

1 ley he

1 -ced to

r, they

hereas

AN EPITOME

OF THE AaRICULTURAL SITUATION, AND AN ESTIMATE OF AMERICAN PRODUCTION AND REQUIREMENTS FOR FOUR QUINQUENNIAL PERIODS.

EXHIBIT I. Shewing Estimates of population of the United G

.. Acres In Cultivation and Required, and Indicating Probabto Extent of Imports of Pood after I 890.

Yua

BtTIKATED POrU-

EVTIMATH OV CUI-TITATED ARKA IN IK'" STArL* aaiuia»I> TO

EntlmaUs

homesnd

foreign needi

al a 0.81 of

au iicre per

capita

EMtlmalM
of acreage Id

quired to meet
home needs
and export
same propor-
tion of Cotton
as now at a J.lfl
acres percnpltJi

EiUmatee of Area wUcti mVt be
Id Mltlvation. the rata parcnnuot
iDcrenu, auO the pa- cmplM quota

...-incniln,

prodtK.tof
eiporwd

aillmnllng retiulre-

acrei per capita
nnd'lIId'l"l"nTlhe

" ln't(Si'alit(&"

Surpliii »l>owii

ruii' a .H-ldacre*
ptrn> pita and
eniilvnlcnllo tho

Quiutwr or pvopln

noDlred to

Wheat al

• O.«ofau

acre per

■xplla

revnlred Id

Comal

* LIB acre.

a ii'.-v ofan

■rpff

por

B(rtlm»t«l
Population
la years

Rata

per

™"

Increase

Eitlmiiltsof I Oirn

InHlaptecrops acr«^

In the years per

named OipllA

1886
1890
1695
ISOO
1905
1810

19

la

12
10

fl.i

7.1

66,700.000
82.600,000
70,000.000
77,000,000
84.000.000
90.000.000

28,730,000
80,000,000
83,600.000
88,960,000
40,320,000
43.200,000

68,280,000
74.376,000
63,300.000
91,630,000
90.960,000
107.100.000

8,855,000
9,876.000
10.800,000
11.660.000
12.600.000
13,500,000

17,267,000
19,375,000
21.700,000
23.870.000
26.040.000
27.600,000

197,000,000 d3.53
211,000.000 rt3.40
220.000.000 3.14
226,000 000 1 2.94
230,500.000 2.74
234.400,000 , 2.60

21.000,000'
13.500,000 f

6,645.000 h

4,300.000 (-

380,000

b S.47S,000

1 1,080,000

, 10.820,000-

24..376,0«l
S7,300/MC<
30,030.000
32.760.000
3S. 100.000

40,000.000

44.800.000
49.280,000
63.760,000
67.600,000

187,500,000
281,200.000
243.800.000
266.400,000
284.400,000

c 7.1
4.35
2.70
2.
1.70

1,200,000-

h| 7, 300,000-

34. goo. OOO

60,000,000-

Showlng the Wheat Production and Consi
of the World during the Oth Decade.

n. F«r iiiuiiner of a«<L«rIaliiiDg per capilit -niula soreuge see Ex-
hibit 3.

b. Exhibit 1 shows that before 1900 we must either Import bread-
stuff; oeiiBO to export oittnn. or lower the Bliindard of UvjDg.

c* lu Exhtbils I and 5 nole great dluiiiiiltlon in rate of Inorense
ofpultlviitedHi re«. ntpedaUy In periods ending with lf«.5aml 1890

d. Itt Exhlhll 1 iiiit« the reduction, from 1886 to 1890, io amount
of land in culttvutioii per capita.

e. Exhii.ii Jsbows ihe vi-ry aiirriilicaot fact that in hut ii -iiikrli-
ye.irBini'f tie hurvest of IHSl-o luis tlie currenl produetiou of wheu''
i-nunlledthecurreal requiretneiilB, und that were tbeaQDual hiirvi-ale
ii^iitjundiinttie llie !;reat one of I8S7-8 they would not dow aufflce.

f ExhlNle2aiid 4 show the productive power of the wheat-fields Of
ili.Mnrldlolie BUfh lis loclenrly indicate a present f 1881) yearly deficit
"( iii-T': thou 100,000.1)00 bLiahelB and with no greater rate of incroiise
"! mrt-iige tnaii hue obtained ainuf 1880, such deficit will an n mil ly

lUfe'iiie

III V more rhan ■:0,0«0,()00 l>uehels.

Exhibit 2 HhowB thill reserves of more than 2r,i),ono.iiOll lnHhelB,
accumulated during the earlier years of the ninih decade ihere Is
every reoBon to believe have been exhausted and that in future we
rauHt rely upon eurrent production to meet cuirent needa, and that a
large defiicit,— wholly todc-peiirlent of the deplorable condiiioo of
growing European crops and due ulone to dcBcient iicrenKe, — will be
painfully upparentat tb^etidof th<^ 1S9I-2 harvest year, oei-easltullDg

Ha r. fat
Year

ProduPllon Id

e Builiela

• Bushels

The Year's

Hurpliii,
• Bushel)

ThP Y(-,u-'«

l). ii.-n.
e Bu«l,eU

1681-3
1682-3
1683-4
1884-6

1885-6
1888-7
1 1387-6

,as..»

1669-00
1890-1

1,977.000.000
2,263.000,000

3.021,000,000
2,047.000.000

ff

aie.000,000

44,000,000
23,000,000

2.263,000.000 2,099.000.000
2.077.000,000 . 2-127,000,000
2,043.000,000 3,164,000.000
f 2.287.000,000 2.188,000,000
2,183,000.000 8,216.000.000
S.048.000,000 8.246,000.000
2.186,000.000 'f 2,280,000.000

164,000,000

60,000,000
111,000,000

80,000,000

83.000,000
IB7.000.000
06,000,000

Total*,

21,366,000,000 31,443,000.000

466.000,000

862.000.000

B Apparent Deficit Auffoat 111, 1691, 07,000,000

EXHIBIT 3. ShowlDe

acri'iu.-'' roiiulrod per cap-
ita to fuTDlsh ■toples con-
sumed Id tbo u. S. and
Cotton ezpoTtad a* com-
putedfromjlaat) too vaara
ot-'ieaceaiid produottoiiaa
set forth la tha reporta of
the DepartmaDt Of Aart-
"■'* first dodootiiis

Wlu.„t

aoaas
...0.48

Oau

PotaUMaad

.. 0.16

' "1

Total of ..

......

extraordinary drafts, early In 18S2, upon Indiu, i^nnth Aiuerk-n umi AiiBtralubiu, which will full far
short of mteting the pressing need* whilu trenching serlouhly U[j.'m euppliea that will be ait badly
needed in the following year.

EXHIBIT 4. Showlngth* Wheat Acreage of the World In 1870, lasoend I 890. Average Yield per Acre,
Productive Power and Requirements

Oaoo aAPBlOAL

Diviaio*

Acres
loWhsai

Spelt
1870

Id WheM
and
spell
1880

and
Spelt

1800

Clidngw

d.irlnK eih

decade Id

Wheat

Acrcmce

Yield

per
acre

years
Bd.

A.Tf^eotlWO

.".'JI'.SS'K.

product or
BnsbeU

ReqnlremeaU
Id

laso

Buebels

93,090,000

18.992.000
1.647,000

86.000,000
1,200,000
1JJ60,000

llJi83,000

1,256,0004
137,0OO-t
118,000-h
829,000
602.000k

S.OOCOOO-I-
386,0004

13.0
12.1
13.
10.
10.3
10.
10.

1. 228.000.000
461. .100.000
34.320.000
360.000.000
39.667.000
43,960,000
181,060,000

1.466.000.000
367,000,000
30,000,000
236,000,000
31,000,000
25,000,000
136.000.000 1

2.342,000
26.812,000
3,386,000
1*00.000
18.610,000

2.640,000
24.983,000
3.870,000
4.396,000
18,196.000

Australasia

Other Countries

Totals and Nat

Increase In Aareag*,

168,882,000

177,310.000

161.474,000

J 4,164.0004

12.1

2,188.197.000

2.280.000,000

EXHIBIT 0. Showing Increase of Cultivated Area

In the United States, and the Rates

Per Cent, of Increase.

Ybab

Cultivated
Area

In
Staple
ProducU

Acres

Cnltlvated Area
Id eacti period and

k oflDcrease

lO'^rcaseorCDltl-
vaied Area eacb
year dnrlng each
p«rl-.il, and yearly
rule per cent,
of Increase

Acres

Rale

PM

oeat.

A<«

Bate
per
eeot.

1676 123.000,000
1680 166,000.000
1866 107,000.000
1890 211,000,000

30,000.000
42.000,000
32,000.000
14,000,000

•32. a

34.1

19.4

• 7.1

7.600,000
6.240.000
6,400.000
2,600,000

• 6.1
8.6
3.0

..J price of \

Id Esxlasd and at Ottlcago and
»nTinni averaii^B values par '~~
shal of Wheat exported 1
the XTnlted States.

EXHIBIT 7. Showing 20 Years' Exports of Wheat from India, Russia and
the United States, Including Flour, the Average per Year during each
Five-year Period, and the Total for Twenty Yeara,

Y«A«

!!ll

||i|

1 .46

; 874

1.09

.14

876

.-3 ■

.07

.34

h. Exhibit 4 shows that during the eighth dei-ade tbe wheat acre.
ageof the world increased 24.0011,000 acres, of which the United Htutcs
contributed 10,000,000 acres, or 79 per cent. During the ninth decade
the Inorease was but 4,164,000 acres, of wbloh tbe United States contrib-
uted 187,000.

During the eighth decade the bread-eating populations increased 11.4
per cent, and (lie wheat area 16.6 per cent., while that of rye reruuined
the same. During Iht ninth dtf^dr thr infretue in the wff.at (and
rye) area uku but 1.4 per cent,, as againut an incr-rtuit in t/ie contntruini;
populfitinn of 14 per cent., (lie ratio bring lu Oft* i» to ten. ThlB showing

is astounding. Doet it not indicate great scarcity and high pricta at an
early d'ly f

J, Although the last tea years' inoreaee In the aereuge Indicates an
Increase in the annual wheat supply of but ."iO, 000.000 bushels yet tbe
bre'id eating populations have invrea»'d o6.000.(K>0, requiring an addi-
tion to tbe annuiJ supply of more than 260,000,000 bushels of wheat and
IbO.OOO.OOO busbelH of rye, and yet the rye gelds are no gremer than in
IRSti. But for tbe exceaslTe wheat acaeage exiating during the «arli.-r
part or the ninth decade, permitting the accumulution uf large reserves,
tbe pinch of si-^arcily would long since have Ijeeu felt.

k. In the United 8tat«a a phenorocmil Incrense of cultivated area
began uliout IKTI, and in the next 14 years populall'in increased 44 per
cent, and snob area 11-' per cent, (t'^ee Bxiilbit 5.)

n. From 1871 to 1889 the i_gold) price of English grown wheat, In
the marheis of (.Ireat BriCtain. shrank 47 percent, aa against a &I1 of
33 per cent, in tbe currency price at Chiciigo and 38 per cent, io the
value of American wheat exported. &o wide a difference in tbe depre-
ciation is due tu tb« lessened cost of iraneportiition , which benefits the
Americitn farmer while having the opposite effect upon hie competitor,

a: li the acreage m»d

1672 .
1873
1874
1876

1678 -
1877
1878
1670 .
1680 .

464,000
1,189,000

736,000
8,278,000
3,004,000
1.884,000

4,087^0

11397^00
1.672,000

4. 109.000

e.8i6Aoo

Totala

13.806,000
87,140,00*
26,496,000
39,203,000

^■6B8,00O__

89,«a6,000

80.838,000
41 668,000
26.271.000
32.876,000
26.764,000
ttS,960 000
351.892 000

67,474,000
68.631.000
68.664,000
41.437,000
46,870.000

64,010,000

68,762,000
66,018,000
61,688.000

aaj>ie.ooo

60318.000

81,574,000
38,096,000
88,016,000
91.610,000
78,913,000

68,408,000

147.61

18Q,a04j000

io9j)a«4Me

86,588.000
48.978,000
76,374,000
83,780.000
67,726,000
62,664.000

91.757,000
61 612.000
77.796,000
136.116.000
_ 107.261.000

oo.eoe.ooo

1.301,000,000

168,888,000

iai,8S«,ooo

147,611,000
111,884,000
132.670.000

140,088,000

84.586.000
163806,000
119.626,000
68,601,000
_ 106,430,000
I13.2O8.000
2,129.427.000

EXHIBIT 8. Showing the World's Area In Food Staples of the Temperate Zones' In 1870, i 880 and ISOO: Acreage Quotas per

Capita : Percentages of Quota Increase and Decrease, and Acreages Above and Below Requirements, as

Indicated l>y Mean Quota for T;«enty Years and that for I 870.

Puonocts.

IB'TO

xeso

^^.

3.B30

Df'"«d'e Twenty Years

n.r;i,°° ! .*"™~,

Acroa^es

Above aud

Below

Rcqulrcmonui

osliidltjiled

Blapica

Per

Cap] 1.1
Acrrace

Acres fer

Id Capita
Suplc^ Acreage

Per
OenLor

BTld

DecrcHJie

Acreage
Quota

1

Acr.' Per
Io CaplU

Per Per
Ceal. orceni. of

Iiifteasp.lDcreate

and and
Decrciue Decreaae

o( or
Acreaup : Acreage
«Ji.r.ta I Q„oi«

Mean
or per
Caplu.

cfeage

Quota

Below
Meaa

Below
RequlrrmcDU

ailndlCQUrd
by Aor«aKO

Quotas
ror Twenty

tWlleatft Spelt
are & Kaallu

163,362,000
100.076.000

0.427
0,304

177,310,000 0.443
106.346,000 0.271
43.480.000 0.108
90,003,000 0.S27
110,377.000' 0.276
23.616,000 0.060

3.74-
10,9-
13.6-

3,74-
17.4-1-

8.3-

161.474,000 0,398
108,304,000 0.238

.4,660.000' 0.006
104.686.000 0.230
127.632,000! 0.280

86,839 000| 0.058

10.3

12.8-

10.2-

.3-1-
1.4-1.
6.1-

6.8-
21.7
22.2-

6.01-

le.M-

B.2-

0.423
0,271
O.lll
0.286
0.264
0.068

0.026-
0.033-
0.013-
0.006-1-

o.oia-i-

0.003-

11.400,000-
16.048.000-
6.926.000
2.280,000-i-
7,296. 0OO-l■
I,36B.0O0-

13,224 000-
30.096,000-
12,768 000

6,016 000-1
80,620.000-1-

2 280 000

78,700.000i 0.210
64.176.0D0 0.286
81.766,000! 0.061

Maiio, Bto. .,
Potatoaa

■WorWaTotaU
AU Staplea

492,467.000 1.372

'664.031,000 1.386 o'.9+

693,047.000, 1.300 8.1 , 6.3- j 1.362

0.063-

23 712.000-

32 832.000

UsVl^Uu'.fb^ ai^BOOO.ODOj 1 400.0O0.OO0| jll.4PrCt 466,000.000 jl4.0Prtt 27.0ftl»,

1

yo vrbeD II 00 nHtl lutes
inly yoant tliSADpi

aiTueri

ft Isvqually

prodaotive power yet. by

iirrica xhoald i|
■ir Ryp relailvt

that moat Wr1t«i« trfatvol

_ -,- .-luon of the yearly viirlnlli

a poor Indication or compnrallva productive power

net for thij last ten years, anri ntldlnj; I'n.non.imi
I'.reonllncnts.and cailllnulhe mt-iin ofpopiilatioii
.Kv consumed an averaijeof i,;ii;i.iJJO.i't«i bushels or
I unit or the population hna been 'iM busliela,
(-■iporla from the olllclal catlniali^ or prudur^
r all iiiiriMUiia. Is (ouud to have bima i.vt

buKhels per mpi
bMn 330,01)0. <-u 1
biubsu per c:ip
eloHlyappiu^iin

The Hnnuai ooQium
I there would appejir

u annual aoreace t
jr capita for these

Lions vrtll hercDtlerrequlreo.caAul' ui
r such population hnvlne or liile y
•asooaele to expect that the Inrrtn'

linearly 8 000,000 acres more tliiin re
I- |wr caplLu requlrementjc prove 10
,-lith decade and the rate of incri'if
': I'lil yeani. the addltloDSIo the rye

iwcniy years— i

olhe world'" rye and n

Inv

long will I

>f the met II

for seven years. bu«
ulla bfllDc about nix
perable dllflculty lu
rtad-cjitlng peoplw.

I la growing the bread-
eqnal to the prodQctof
lining that tho bread-
' In ryo and wheal, and

.crea of rye and

:lon equal that
nrea ehonld ex-

wenty year^. al
■ II 6«ofan ncre.
« the addmon.
Ids, being more

tiie United siate* •■'■>,
(M.UW.OW acn-it doi* riiii
IndiRs from which it
irnnti tax. to wrlnKK'i

I'lvcion'Mtlii"" w.

hni tmt to CI

1> pOMlbll

liitluu, and uuipl(.H nii'uuh ut iruuopuruitlon- In the at>-
.-n Will be very alow. But three regions- Auxlrataala,
'•■■<. meet tbe flnt tbtec, and In all the available area Is
>.: in tbe United Stales twenty-five year* slooe, aad each
iiUtion and the means or transportation.
iw prima were alT^l«d by tbe opening or.

lands not rertllinvd
tlon ar<> or Io
>) ranting

will, rn-H "in
wttnever

.. from India, during the elKhlh^hd ninth decades,
Ezhlblta 6, a and 7.
. . _ 3 Increase maoafaciured articles indennliely, there Is
the Isnd can be iDcrea-ed. and. under eilfllDg
produd of any given ari-a !• nolllfcr' ■

I far. the rnost prosperous
d- lie owns and cultlva(«r '
1, rorogo aad SiMt crops ol

telyu .

Dgbronsht under c

i» aecooipnnylag data the

EXHIBIT 9. Showing the WHEAT and RYE Acreage of the World at the Clos*
of the Ninth Decade and the Annual Average Product for Ten Yeara.

w

H1£AT

RYE AND MASLIN | |

GKOOHAPUICal.
DlVIHtOH.

Acre, lb

Average Prodnot

A eras in Ryo

Average

w and Spelt

Miulluf

J?:SSI8S§

310 271 000

4 6 3 000

76 000,000

Germany — -.-

iSpaln -

79 070 000

2 500 000 ■

Belstum .
1 Portugal

7,785 000

tlHSOOOO

3 806.000

Greece

42.000

106,678 000

1279,230,000,

Eui-opear^ Totals

94 446 000

1,222.722 000

38 184.O0O

439 767 000

2.366 000

25.251 000;

Other Countries

13 196.000

110 608,000

World Totals

161,474 000

2.139 676 000

108 364 000

1,306.641000

ind Turkey Includes Bnlgarla

wlu addition to tbe w
ibout IO,DOO,UOD and tha n
inpply of breadnlum.

EXHIBIT 10. Showing the Geographical and Acreage Distribution, at the End of Three Decennial Periods, of the World's Area in Grain and Potatoes, and Total Acreage in Each Staple, and Total in Each Geographical Division,

•

1870

OB THE BSD OP THE SEVENTH BECADE.

1 HHU

OR THE END OF THE EIOHTB DBCADB.

i8»o

OB THE END OP THE NINTH DECADE.

DivtaioM

'3'

8peltt

"rfiiisf

Acrea

In
larloy

Aore*

la
Oau

Acres ta

„ H«1M.

Bucawhntt.
Millet. Eta.

Acr«*
Potatoes

Acres

all
BtaplM

Acre*

Wb^t
andSpeltl

Acwa

Rye
and irfaallDt

Acres

Id
Barley

Acres
Oats

Aares la
MalM,

Millet, Eu.

Acres
PolatMs

in

aU

Staplas

Acres Id

Bpeltt

»«f

la
Barley

Oats

Acre* la

Mnlie.

Buekwheal,

Millet Etc

Acni

PollllOS

Acrse
In

Europe
HnlWd SUtea

1 Oanwla
Inilla

Aoatralaala
South AmorloB
Other Ooaatrtoa

1 847,000

I 2B0 000
11.283 000

107 827.000

e'obd

39 393.000

'eooiooo

61 000
4 203 000

1.600.000
360.OO0
48.000

42.662,000

39.184.000

312,000

142 000

..SSS:888

Ifl 047.000

1 325,000
403 000

60.000

4.629,000
2. -b. 000 000
1,833,000
I 7B0 000
ie,8BB 000

03 191.000

37,987,000
2.342.000

26 812 000
3 369 000
1 800 000

12.810,000

106 440 000

■111883

9 000

36,381,000

'iir8g8

71416,000

'l:ilf.888

438.000
72.000

44 245.000

"'538:888
«S:§88

1,373.000

21 186,000

■ 135:888

90.000

16,000

^°:?il:888

2,696.000
18.380,000

l2:St:8S8
a3:3ii:888

3.670.000

■l:?IS:8S8

106,876.000

2,366,000

1 20.000

J:883

86,010,000
2,067.000
1,187,000

4,810:000

73,008,000

"5:585:888
"1:888

60,000

43,039.000

79.232.000

900 000

2 8SS888

1.386JX)0

'476;000

187.000
40 000

370 634 000
16.873,000

World Totala,

163,362 000

109.078.000

46.386,000

79.T00.00O

4.116000

21.785,000 462.467,000

177.810.000

106 346,000

43 480,000

60,908.000

110.377,000

83 816 000

664.031.000

161.474,000

108.864,000

44,660,000

104.888,000

127.632.000 26.839,000

693,047.000

THE FARMER IN THE COMING CHANGE. 25

during that decade there was added to such wheat producinp: area 4,164,000 acres (being
but 2.3 per ceut.)or an iiiv;t iqual to tlie refjuirenients of 10,000,000 people which, added
to the 2<j,000,000 which the Kurjilus aciviifro, at the bejritiniiiR of the decade, would supply,
and we have, at the end of the niiitli deiade, a supi)ly sufflcient for but 30,000,000 out of
the 56.000,000 that have been added to llie bread-euting iiopulalious of European blood
since 18S0 the residue bavin,^, up to this time, been supplied by the enormous reserves
that accumulated in .mill, warehou.se and farm granary during the existence of a surplus
acreage, such reserves being now quite exhausted.

From the bvst data obtainable it would appear that with an average yield the
world's crop of wheat is now 100,000,000 bushels less than the yearly consumption, and
that each passing year, by reason of the increase in the bread-eating population, adds
from twenty to twenty-five millions to this yearly deficit, so that by 1895 it can hardly be
less than 200,000,000 bushels if the per capita requirements remain as large as they have
been.

Up to the present time the reserves accumulated during the existence of a surplus
acreage have sufficed to meet this deficit — such deficit in the five years of its continuance
and growth having probably aggregated 300,000,000 bushels less the excess of the great
crop of 1887-8 — but there is abundant evidence that these reserves are everywhere exhausted-

The people of Eurojie yearly consume about three bushels of rye per capita, and as
no additions have been made lo the world's rye fields since 1870 there is an additional
draft of something like 17,000,000 l)ushels with each recurring year to meet a demand for
wheat created by the failure of tlie rye fields to expand as the rye-eatiug population in-
creases, and this has consumed much of the world's surplus of wheat — probably 150.000,-
000 bushels since 1880 — hence each year's addition to the supply of wheat and rye must
hereafter be from 43,000,000 to 44,000,000 bushels. In other words, we must annually add
to our wheat and rye fields nearly 4,000 000 acres, while theadditionsof the last ten years
have been but 400,000 acres per annum.

All additions to the area devoted to the two orincipal bread-making grains have
ceased in Europe as a whole; have ceased in the Uuiied States, and among the exporting
countries such area is increasing only in Canada, Australia and Argentina, and only in
Argentina does it keep pace with domestic requirements. The other primary food staples
.show a somewliat greater relative increase, but, taking all kinds of grain and potatoes,
they are increasing less than one-half as fast as the consuming population.

Of recent years the cultivated acreage of the United States increasing less than one-
half as fast as the domestic requirements, we are yearly making great inroads upon the
acreage heretofore employed in producing the grain and animal products sent abroad,
and while we now export — exclusive of cotton — something less than six per cent, of the
products of our farms, this percentage must, from increasing home needs, diminish more
than one-fifth per year.

Owing to our inability to make further considerable drafts ujion a public domain
that has been practically exhausted of its tillable portion and the rapid augmentation ot
domestic population and requirements, it appears probable that we shall cease to export
food at the end of five years, and as the world will then be annually short some 200,000,-
000 bushels of wheat and a still greater quantity of rye, to say nothing of other food
staples, high prices must then obtain, but we need not wait five years for high prices, as
the deficient acreage now obtaining ensures such prices from this year forward, and the
impossibility of making good this deficit in the world's food areas, while population con-
tinues to increa-;e at anything near present rates, assures the prolonged continuance ol
such prices and high prices for the products of the farm means that the farmer will not
much longer be under the neces.sity of working on an average from fourteen to sixteen
hours per day and that he will soon take his rightful place in the world and receive his
share of the good things of life. He will build better houses, barns and granaries; hia
land will rapidly double and treble in value, and being able to secure what money he
actually requires from the sale of only a portion of his produce, he will not be forced to
sell when all others are doing likewise; hence, while prices will be so much better, they
will also be far steadier and fluctuate onlv as affected by suddIv and demand, whereas

24

selling pri

velopraent

primary St. j^rn r-j-jpi •

times are h * '

The]
1875 tbian c
has been lo

tiie cost of

.J '

mense agri . ;ao

fucturer, tr-^"~'T

and tlie w ■'f"

impossible ■;

years, wlie . Hi*;?

debt, with ', * ■'

ing and is i— T~"

necessary t'O**®*' '

as a most cl<j:>op. ' ' i

for such pr nn .

other classi , '

upon and

that remot

no power \

agriculture

source of a -niuinu i

to watch tl

meagre. '

Mau i't»

differ wo))
basic iudu:
and that 11

the body p . jiti t
devoted to

Now, how 'srUanlworlS .*• Tt&

his affairs

Wh(
as well in
and it is tl
the ueedec
United St
America, :
the produi

Dur
numbers)
as being e
eating po]
27,000,000
of 320,000
67,000,000
kept pace
would ha
requirem

Asi
cent, gre
populutii
develope
of a like

THE FARMER IIST THE COMING CHANGE. 25

during that decade there was added to such wheat producing area 4,164,000 acres (being
but 2.3 per ceilt.)or an area equal to the requireiiients of lO.dOO.OOO people which, added
to the 2t>,000,000 which the surplus acrcagt', at the lie,i;iniiiii<? of the decade, would supply,
and we have, at the end of the ninth decade, a supply .sufllcicnt for but 36,000,000 out of
the 56.000,000 that have been added to the bread-eating iiopulations of European blood
since 18S0 the residue havin;^, up to this time, been supplied by the enormous reserves
that accumulated iu.inill, warehouse and farm granary during the existence of a surplus
acreage, such reserves being now quite exhausted.

From the bpst data obtainable it would appear that with an average yield the
world's crop of wheat is now 100,000,000 bushels less than the yearly consumption, and
that each passing year, by reason of the increase in the bread-eating population, adds
from twenty to twenty live millions to this yearly deficit, so that by 18!)") it can hardly be
less than 200,000,000 bushels if the per capita requirements remain as large as they have
been.

Up to the present time the reserves accumulated during the existence of a surplus
acreage have sufficed to meet this deficit — such deficit in the five years of its continuance
and growth having probably aggregated 300,000,000 bushels less the excess of the great
crop of 1887-8 — but there is abundantevidence that these reserves are everywhere exhausted-

The people of Europe yearly consume about three bushels of rye per capita, and as
no additions have been made lo the world's rye fields since 1870 there is an additional
draft of something like 17,000,000 bushels with each recurring year to meet a demand for
wheat created by the failure of the rye fields to expand as the rye-eating population in-
creases, and this has consumed much of the world's surplus of wheat — probably 150.000,-
000 bushels since 1880 — hence each year's addition to the supply of wheat and rye must
hereafter be from 43,000,000 to 44,000,000 bushels. In other words, we must annually add
to our wheat and rye fields nearly 4,000 000 acres, while theadditionsof the last ten years
have been but 400,000 acres per annum.

All addilions to the area devoted to the two Rrincipal bread-making grains have
ceased in Europe as a whole; have ceased in the Uuiied States, and among the exporting
countries such area is increasing only in Canada, Australia and Argentina, and only in
Argentina does it keep pace with domestic requirements. The other primary food staples
show a somewhat greater relative increase, but, taking all kinds of grain and potatoes,
they are increasing less than one-half as fast as the consuming population.

Of recent years the cultivated acreage of the United States increasing less than one-
half as fast as the domestic requirements, we are yearly making great inroads upon the
acreage heretofore employed in producing the grain and animal products sent abroad,
and while we now export — exclusive of cotton — something less than six per cent, of the
products of our farms, this percentage must, from increasing home needs, diminish more
than one-fifth per year.

Owing to our inability to make further considerable drafts upon a public domain
that has been practically exhausted of its tillable portion and the rapid augmentation of
domestic population and requirements, it appears probable that we shall cease to export
food at the end of five years, and as the world will then be annually .?hort some 200,000,-
OOO bushels of wheat and a still greater quantity of rye, to say nothing of other food
staples, high prices must then obtain, but we need not wait five years for high prices, as
the deficient acreage now obtaining ensures such prices from this year forward, and the
impossibility of making good this deficit in the world's food areas, while population con-
tinues to incrca-e at anything near present rates, assures the prolonged continuance of
such prices and liigh prices for the products of the farm means that the farmer will not
much longer be under the necessity of working on an average from fourteen to sixteen
hours per day and that he will soon take his rightful place in the world and receive his
share of the good things of life. He will build better houses, barns and granaries; hia
land will rapidly double and treble in value, and being able to secure what money he
actually requires from the sale of only a portion of his produce, he will not be forced to
sell when all others are doing likewise; hence, while prices will be so much better, they
will also be far steadier and fluctuate onlv as affected by suddIv and demand, whereas

26 THE FARMER IN THE COMING CHANGE.

now theyarw affected by his necessities, which impel him to market hisproducta just when
every one else is doing so, the result being seasons of glutted markets and low prices,
which once down are bard to elevate, while the overmarketing in tlie earlier part of the
harvest year places a wonderful power in the hands of the gambler, who unliesitatingly
uses it to further wreck prices. Once the farmer is in a position to hold his products,
until they are required for immediate consumption, the market wiocker will be divested
of much of his pernicious power over prices as then it will be tlie amount of real stuff
offiering — not the fictions as now — which will determine prices.

The coming of this advance in the returns of the farmer means a most profound
change in all political, industrial and financial relations, as the farmer will cease to be a
borrower and this will necessarily cause a lowering of interest rates and the West pro-
ducing, as now, an immense surplus of food staples which the East must have, great
sums will yearly move permanently from the East to the West in payment for high
priced farm products and this will result in converting the west from the debtor to the
creditor section.

Results so desirable to farmers, east as well as west, and to all interested, directly
or indirectly, in western property or securities will come because the consuming element
of the bread eating world has more than caught up with that enormous development of
agricultural lands that to the thoughtless seemed to make good the boast that we could
feed the world.

SOME SURPLUS PRODCTOlNG STATES.

Only the twelve States named in the following tables produee a surplus of the
great food staples, while such States as Ohio, Michigan and Washington produce a
surplus of wheat alone. Their entire acreage in food and forage staples being found to be
less than the normal per capita quota of 2.85 acres, they are, notwithstanding the fact
that their lauds are above the average of the whole country in fertility, not clearly surplus
producing States, hence are not included with those that are, although it is questionable
upon which side of the line they belong.

From the data to be found in the accompanying pages, and in the broad sheet fol-
lowing; page 24, it is clear that hereafter such States, dlstrietsaud individuals as produce
the staple products largely in excess of domestic needs will enjoy an unexampled pros-
perity, as they will be able to command very high prices for their surplus — prices so much
greater than the average cost of production as to leave a very large profit, hence the most
fertile districts will be the most prosperous and the surplus food producing States of the
Mississippi basin, large areas upon the Pacific slope and limited districts in the mountain
regions being exceptionally productive, it follows that the prosperity which they will
enjoy will be equally exceptional.

If the conditions as to climate and fertility are equally favorable it would appear
that such States as produce— relatively to domestic requirements— the greatest surplus of
food would enjoy the greatest prosperity; the accumulation of wealth be greatest, and the
advance of land values, such as to soon place them upon a par with those of the best of the
older districts.

That we may get a definite idea of the present relative importance — agriculturally
—of the sever.al States that produce, and are likely to continue to produce, a surplus of
the staple food crops it is best to resort to a tabular exhibit showing the areas in corn,
wheat, oats, other cereals and potatoes, separately, the several States being placed in the
order indicated by the total area of each under such crops.

SOME SURPLUS PRODUCING STATES.

27

States.

Acres
. in Corn.

Acres
in Wheat.

Acres
In Oats.

1

Acres In
Other Ccr'ls

Acres in
Potatoes.

Total Acr'ge
in Food
Staples.

Illinois

8,022.000

8,860 Olio

6,776,000

6,796,000

3,668,000

4,097.000

768.000

1,102,000

885,000

160 000

8,000

1,853,000
1,685,0110
8,600,000
1,603 000
2,494.000
1,418,000
3,144.000
1,073,000
4,210,000
3,300.000
887,000

3,372,000
2,567,000
1,. 303,000
1,413,000
1,017,000
1,053,000
1.500,000
1,407,000
1.183,000
71,000
222,000

308,000

333,000

205,000

63,000

65,000

276.000

419,000

770,000

280.000

817,000

41,000

146,000

188,000

139,000

86,000

79,000

84.000

82.000

138,000

58,000

61,000

20,000

13,701,000
13,633,000
11,023,000
9,961,000
7,323,000
6,928,000
6,913,000
4,580,003
6,616,000
4,409,000
1,178,000

Iowa

Missouri

lDdiai)f\

Nebraska

Nrinnesotii

Wisfonsiii

California

Ore'^oii

Totals

40,142,000

25,267,000

15,198,000

3,577,000

1,081,000

85,265,000

In this exhibit it is seen that the States named produce 51 per cent of the acres of
corn; 65 per cent, of the acres of wheat; 59 per cent, of the acres of oats; 57 per cent, of
the acres of barley, rye and buckwheat, and 43 per cent, of the acres of potatoes.

While Illinois takes first rank, Iowa, is, even now. a close second and soon likely to
take the lead in total area under food crops, as slie now ranks first in the matter of sur-
plus production, and as the highest degree of prosperily is likely to result from the
greatest production in excess of domestic requirements, it is probable that Iowa will long
retain first rank while the relative rank, in the race for wealth, of the surplus producing
States would appear to be very clearly indicated in the following table, where each Stata
holds the place earned by its power to produce food in excess of present domestic needs,
and wherein is shown the population, the area under food and foraf,'e staples, the number
of people each can subsist from the acreage now devoted to such crops, the number that
could be subsisted by the cultivated acreage in excess of the present population and the
per capita acreage under cultivation:

Population.

Iowa ,

Kan.sas

Illinois

Nebraska

Minnesota....

Missouri

Dakotas

Indiana

Wisconsin....

California

Oregon

1,912,000
1,427,000
3,820,000
1.059,000
1,302,000
2,679,000

512,000
2,192.000
1,687.000
1,208,000

314.000

>

SB'S

17,.SOO,000

12,.S00,000

18,200,000

8,300,000

7,700,000

11,600,000

7,800,000

9,200,000

6,000.000

4.900,000

1 ,656,000

Totals 18,118,000 105,556,000

■,K

w rt o (
CTp-rt

■2or

f^ ^ n S
n ti <r* rn

or

fT>

6,070,000
4,316,000
6,385,000
2 912,000
2,702,000
4,070,000
2,736,000
3,228.000
2,316,000
1,719,000
518,000

36.972,000

^2 ; 3 =

^3 k-* t (0

4.158,000

2,889,000

2,559,000

1,653,000

1,400,000

1.391.000

2,224 000

1,036,000

629,000

511,000

207,000

18,917,000

So-

re®

: ?f3.

9.10
8.63
4.76
7.84
5.91
4.33

4.20
3.91
4.06

5.S8

5,83

This showing is remarkable and very significant, making manifest, as it does, that
of the 191,000,000 acres employed in the Republic in the production of grain, hay and
potatoes no less than 105.500.000— or 65 per cent.— are to be found in the twelve surplus
producing States, and while they have a population of 18.000,000 they now produce sulli-
cient of the primary food staples for the subsistence (even at the present high standard of
living) of 87,000,000 jieople. This, however, but inadequately measures their relative
productive power, as such is the fertility of their lands that, aside from the production of
such a great proportion of the primary staples, they are pre-eminent (or an ability to pro-
duce the secondary forms of food as they do the animals used for draft and pleasure, as is

*Tbe reports of the Department of Agriculture not showing tlie Jtuiiotas BOparutely, It ie Imprao
ticable to determine the per capita acreage saliefactorlly.

28

SOME SURPLUS PRODUCING STATES.

clearly shown iQ the foUowiug table, stating the nuin'isr of horses Cittla and swine la
tlie United States, and In each of these States, on tlie first of January, 1391, as set forth
In the report of the Department of Agriculture for that month:

Horses.

Cattle.

Swine.

United Statbs

14,057,000

52,895,000

50,625,000

Illinois

1.124 000
1,095 000
748,000
806,000
648.000
558,000
391,000
433,000
237,000
361,000
181,000

2,859,000

3,959 000

2,679,000

2,632,000

1,762,000

1,770,000

1,183 000

1,540,000

951,000

840 000

827,000

4,944,000

5,921 000

Kansas

3,144,000

Missouri

4,586,000

Indiana

2.561,000

Nebraska

2,310,000

Minnesota

538 000

Wisconsin

Dakotas

California

1,110,000
429 000
518,000

Oregon

230,000

6,582,000
47 per cent.

21,002 000
40 per cent.

26,291,000

Percent, of whole

52 per cent.

While the States named have but 29 per cent, of the population of the United States
they have 55 percent, of the acreage in the great food and forage staples, and, having a
soil much above the average iu fertility, produce 63 per cent, of the grain, hay and pota-
toes of the nation; 47 per cent of the horses; 40 per cent, of the cattle, and 52 per cent,
of the swine.

If hereafter farm products are to rule as high iu price as is implied by the world's
deficient acreage, the exhaustion of the available lands and the disproportionate rates at
which cultivated acres and population ar.e and have, for years, been increasing then the
three preceding tables would indicate that such States will long eujoj' an unexampled
prosperity, and that such as have the greatest cultivated acreage per capita — as have, iu
the order named, Iowa, Kansas, Neliraska and the Dakotas— would seem to have every
assurance, by reason of a surplus proportionately the greatest, of being the exceptionally
prosperous parts of the food-producing West.

-li^..

Given a bread-eating popuation— the world's— Increasing at the rate of 14 per cent
In ten years and an acreage in grain and potatoes increasing at the rate of 7 per cent., it
Is only a question of time when scarcity and high prices will result.

-•<••►-

As the farmers of the West become prosperous and farm lands advance in value so
wVll nrosner all other western interests and western town property enhance in value.

AN OPEN LETTER.

To John Williams, Esq., St. Louis, Mo.

Df.\r Sir : IlefeiTiriR to your letter of July 12tli, I beg leavo to say that my rea-
sons for believing that good lands anywhere in tlie United States will be worth $100 an
acre within tive years, are as follows :

No matter how much or how little land there may be under wheat, we must have
a given C|naiitity under each of the other stai)les, as is succinctly set forth in the follow-
ing exhibit as is the manner of- arriving at such quantities.

ExiirBiT showing the acreage re(]iiired per capita to furnish staples consumed in the U,
S. and cotton exported, as coin[>uted from (last) ten years acreage and production as
set forth in the reports of the Department of Agriculture, first deducting the pro-
portion of tobaci'o and grain — including the secondary form of auimals and animal
products — exported.

Acres.

Wheat 0.48

Corn 1.19

Oats 0.39

Hay 0.64

Barley, Rye, ]
Buckwheat, I n ,,

Potatoes I "'^^

and Tobacco, J
Cotton 0.31

Total of 3.16

Just as soon as we lessen the quantity of hay or any other staple (needed for domestic
consumption) below the current requirements, the price of that product will advance out
of all proportion to the price of other staples, and land will at once revert to the growth
of the high-priced product and there will be a lessened production of one or more o)
the other staples, the price of which will rise if the quantity produced is less than
current needs.

There is an exact and ascL-rtaiuable ratio between population and the production ol
each and all of the farm staples entering into general consumption, and my investiga-
tions have been directed to the determination of this relationship.

With a surplus of land in cultivation, the product of which must be marketed
abroad, it has not been as easy to determine this matter as it will be when this surplus
has been eliminated, as the elimination of this surplus will enable us to see the more
clearly the inexorable character of the law of demand and supi)ly, and when our people
shall require all our products he who runs may read the proportions of such relationship.
That we have not seen it before is probably due to the fact that we have had too much
land in cultivation, and could increase any one }j}oducl at ivill without diminishing the
domestic supply of any other. This is, however, about to change— and by ^ about" I mean
within five years— and such desir.able change as is coming will be greatly hastened if we
can deprive the short-sellers, o,n the "Boards-of-Trade," of their baleful power over prices

We cannot, us you suggest, take the pasture lands to grow wheat and other cereals
as the moment we reduce the number of cuttle (other than milk cows) below 530 to 1,000
people, just that moment beef will become the most profitable product of the farm and
great multitudes will rush into the cattle business, as they did in the earlier part of the
ninth decade, when the immense amount of unoccupied lands, existing in the plain and
raounlaia regions, enabled them to swamp ihe cattle business and bury its devotees undei
an avalanche of low-priced animals. Such conditions, however, can never again obtain
as unoccupied areas do not exist permitting any such increase in the relative number ol
cattle. Indeed, from this day forward there is abundant reason to believe that the ratio
sf cattle to people will constantly lessen and the cattle business become very profitable to
the farmer.

Nor can you take tlie dairy pastures and convert them into grain fields, as the mo-
ment you do, and reduce the number of milk cows to less than 230 to 1,000 people, that
moment the price of milk, butter and olieese will mbunt skyward and grain fields will b«
converted into meadows and dairy farms.

80 AN OPEN LETTER.

For eanh 1,000 units added to llio population we must add 230 milkcowa andagiven
number of horses, and but for tlie surplus of beeves now existing we should have to add
600 to 530 cattle (other tbau milk cows) and for every cow, steer or horse added we must
add from six to seven acres to our farms, and of this from two and a half to three acres
must be in pasture.

Instead of converting pastures into grain fields we miist add to such pastures in a
definite ratio, and having now more wheat land than is required to meet the demands of
our own people we shall take these surplus wheat fields and grow thereon the corn, hay,
oats, rye, barley, buckwheat and potatoes required at hilme as well as the tobacco and
cotton we consume and export, and when all the land that is now iu cultivation, and that
will, in the meantime, be brought into cultivation, is employed in i)roducing the food,
provender and materials of manufacture wbich our people require — as it will be not later
than 1896— we must either cease to export cotton and grow grain upon the cotton lands,
lower the standard of living, or import food.

Such is the relationship between population and the production of staples that there
is but one crop we can reduce the area of, for more than one year, and that is wheat.

It is true that we now have about 2,000,000 acres more of corn land than is required
by the existing population, but population will certainly overtake tliecorn fields not later
than 18i)3, and in all probability iu 1892, and tben we must either reduce the per capita
consumption of corn or convert wheat lands into corn fields.

When I say there is now 2,000,000 acres surplus corn acreage, I mean that (he pro-
duct of this two million acres now r/ocs abroad in the form of grain, meat and dairy
products, and that not later than 1S93 or 1894 we shall consume at home every pound of
such product made from an average crop of corn unless we shall tben have converted a
part of the wheat lands into corn fields, a« the additions made yearly to our population
necessitate an addition, annually, of 1,800,000 acres to the corn fields.

Etisling, as there does, an exact relationship between population and all the staple
products of the farm— such ratio varying only as varies the standard of living — when we
can determine the proportions of this relationship we can estimate the acreage and pro-
duct required with just as much certainty as a finance minister can estimate the amount
of reven ue from auy impost.

Having ascertained that the average yield of wheat, for a period of ten years, is 12.1
bushels per acre, and that the annual consumption has been 5.73 bushels per capita, we
are able to say that, with average yields, each unit of the population requires 0.48 of an
acre in wheat, and knowing the population and the rate at which it is increasing, we can
assume that there will be over 70,000,000 people inhabiting the United States in 1895 aud
that tliey will— with an average yield— require the product of nearly 34,000 000 acres in
wheat, and, applying the same process to each of the other farm staples, we determine
that they will require 83,300,000 acres in corn, 27,300,000 acres iu oats, 44,800.000 acres in
hay, 10 ."JOO.OOO acres in barley, rye, buckwheat, potatoes and— including that exported—
21,700,000 acres in cotton, ma'^iug a total of over 221,000,000 acres.

If we can determine, approximately, the area which will then be in cultivation —
and I hold we can— we can then say how much in excess or how much short of current
domestic needs our products will be with average yields, and this is what I have attempted
to do in Exhibit 1 of the "Epitome"* sent you, and this, with the world's (well ascer-
tained) deficient wheat and rye acreage, and which it will be wholly impossible to make
good and then have such acreage keep pace with the increase in population, cause me to
believe that, not later than 1896, any acre of land in the United States that will, without
more than the average cost for fertilization and cultivation, produce average crops of food,
forage or fiber will sell readily for one hundred golden dollars.

In this connection permit me to say that I have but just returned from a journey
through Illinois, Iowa and the other grain-growing States, and when in Iowa was a.ssured
by farmers, merchants and bankers that the selling price of Iowa farms had advanced
fully 2i pL'rcent. within a twelve month with the demand brisk at the advance, and I
found similar conditions obtaining iu,Illinoia and the othrt- great food-producing Slates.
"sice "EDilome of the AKilcullJir.al Situatloi^" following page 24.

THE MARKET WRECKER— A MENACE.

The one menace to the prosperity of the American farmer is tlie practice of short-
selling (or option dealing) upon the "Boards of Trade."

In order to so discuss option dealing, or the short selling of farm products, that the
reader may understand what is the writer's conception of the term, it will be best to illus-
trate by saying tliat ou September SOth:

"A" contracts to sell and deliver and "B" to receive and pay for 10,000 bushels of
the speculative grade of wheat at $1.00 per bushel, delivered at seller's option in Decem-
ber. There are also forms of option dealing which boards of trade do not recognize as
reguUr, but wink at, such as "puts and calls," and a process obtains called "ringing out"
whereby a vast majority of deals are daily settled by a kind of clearing house operation
without any intention or semblance of delivery.

Under the contract supposed "A" has the "option" of delivering the amount of
wheat named at such time during the month of December as he may elect, the term
"option" having reference solely to the time when, during the month named, the seller
maj' declare the contract matured, but not one contract in ten thousand is ever carried
into effect by the delivery of property, it being a matter of common notoriety that in
9,999 out of every 10,000 such transactions "A" neither owns nor expects to own the
grain he contracts to sell and deliver, nor does "B" expect to receive the wheat he has
entered into a contract to receive and pay for, the tacit understanding being that should
the price of wheat, at maturity of contract, have advanced to $1.05 per bushel, "A" shall,
instead of delivering to "B" 10,000 bushels, pay him the ditTerence between the then
market price and the contract price, which being 5 cents per bushel. "A" pays "B"
1500.00. On the other hand, should the price have declined 5 cents, "B" would settle the
deal by paying "A" $500.00.

In all time cont»iicts entered into upon Boards of Trade (and this term is used to
designate all exchanges where such contracts are made), with very rareexceptions, neither
seller nor buyer own or expect to own a single pound of the commodities in which they
pretend to deal; nor do they contemplate the delivery or receipt of such commodities, but
each hopes the price will turn in his favor and enable him to win. Thus the transaction
bears the same relation to commerce as does a wager upon a horserace, the only difference
being that in one case a definite sum is at stake, while in the other the wager is an in-
definite one that the price of wheat in some future month will vary from a stated sum,
the amount of the wager being measured by such variation, and the winning party is
determined, not by supi)ly and demand, but by as incalculable a contingency as the pre-
ponderance of the "bull" or "bear" element when the contract matures.

After the making of sucli a contract, "A" is short on December wheat and is des-
ignated as a "bear," and "B" is long on December wheat, and is classed as a "bull."

As nine-tenths of the time more option dealers are interested in depressing than
in advancing prices, the weight and influence of the speculative body is almost continu-
ally exerted in depressing prices. First comes the constitutional bear, who, from long
habit of thought or a pessemistie mental tendency, has come to believe prices are always
too high; then the professional bear, who, knowing it is easier to depress than advance
prices, sells below the current price property he does not own, and whose winnings de-
pending upon lower prices, exerts all his ingenuity in exaggerating the extent of the
supply and fabrication of sueh reports of failures, panics, stringent money markets and
the great breadth of and favorable conditions surrounding the growing crops as will tend
to cause the "longs" to become pLinic stricken and throw their holdings on the market
and thus depress prices to a point that will enable him to win. Next comes the specu-
lator, who, being convinced prices are too low and must advance greatly, intends to profit
by the expected rise, but being "out of the mafket" and desiring to get in a« cheaply as
possible, becomes an active and unscrupulous bear, exerting himself to the utmost to de-
press prices that he may buy the more cheajily and increase his margin of winnings.
Thus the efforts of nearly all the devotees at this singular commercial shrine work for

32 THE MARKET WRECKER— A MENACE.

lower prices, being effectiiMlly aided by a constant fear, on the partof holders of contracts,
that prices will recede and entail loss.

The bears act upon the knowledge that men can be terrorized into selling, and any
improbable tale of disaster will have an intlueuce; hence, when they raid the market the
Rir is thick with rumors of failures, panics and wide-spread comnmrcial disaster, conpUd
with the offering in a single day of more grain than there is in tlie country, the result
being that the bull becomes, in turn, nervous, timid and then panic stricken, and being
unable to respond to a call for increased margins, throws his grain overboard, adding
greatly to the swelling tide and helping to further depress the price. These immense
offerings result in di.sastrous effects upon prices and the prosperity of the producer, the
prices for whose products are fixed by these operations.

"A." among thousands of others, having contracted to deliver what he does not
own and is unable to buy, except at a price greater than that at which he has agreed to
sell, resorts to all conceivable devices, falsehoods and misrepresentations to break the
market and so cheapen products, before the maturity of his contract, as to leave i differ-
ence in his favor, or that will enable him to buy a like amount of speculative grain at a
price lower than that named in his contract with "B."

What with multitudes of bears, with contracts maturing and a contingent of bulla
anxious to "get in on breaks," an immense majority of speculators are ever working for
low prices and offering hundreds of millions of fiat products, and with each drop in price
having a profit, inulti))ly the offerings, such additional tenders further depressing pricesi
and thus without possessing a pound of the product offered these men are, by one round
in the grain-pits, able to depreciate in value the entire grain products of the couutr3',
such depreciation sometimes representing a large part of the year's earnings of millions
of farmers.

How different is the course of the legitimate dealer owning or haviug the means of
producing the commodities offered for sale. All his efforts are directed towards securing
good prices, steadiness in demand and freedom from rapid and wide oscillations in values.
The seller who is an owner of property never depreciates it value, nor does he depress
prices by offerings of impossible quantities which it would be impractible to deliver.

On the other hand, the market wrecker is such an exceptional product of civiliza-
tion, and short selling such a singular commercial method that dealer and method are
alike unique, being the only person and method ever engaged in systematically depreciat-
ing what the person proposes to sell, by such method; and such phases of option dealing
and Board of Trade methods are not inaptly characterized in the following paragraph
from the Chicago Herald:

"The trouble with the Board of Trade seems to be that instead of being, as it ought
to be, a body of intelligent merchants devoted to the advancement of legitimate business
and an intelligent study of questions affecting the control of the products of the West
and their direction to the Chicago market, they seem to have reached the level of a body
of mere speculative "scalpers," living off the I'artiiiM', producing nothing and In no sense
contributing by their industry to the general good."

Nothing could be more destructive of the interest alike of producer and legitimate
dealer than the practices now obtaining on the Boards of Trade where for each unit of
any actual product sold and delivered hundreds of thousands of fictitious units are offered
at prices sometimes one to fifteen per cent, below the price obtaining for actual product,
owing doubtless to the fact that the mill has not been invented which will convert fig-
ments into merchantable flour. Such practices result in abnormal and excessive fluctua-
tions in values — fluctuations so rapid as to bewilder those on the spot, as is shown by a
recent Chicago market report in the statement that:

"The uncertainly witli which the market moved yesterday maybe illustrated by
an incident. One trader huving purchased 25,000 1 u.«hels December wheat at $1 02|
stepped out of the pit. ITe liad Ijoen out but a moment when he heard a great hubbub,
rushed in under the impression that the market was dropping on him, frantically inquired
the price, was told it was "seven-eights," sold his wheat at that price, and was cursing
his luck over a loss of "threej-eighths" when he heard the remark that it was a quick
"bulge" and learned it was II.O-IJ instead of ?l,01-a and that he had a profit of two and
five-eighths instead of a loss."

THE Market wrecker— a menace. 33

Such conditions could not ol)tain were men dealing in products instead of lictions,
as an iininense capital would bo involved instead of insignificant margins uud callow
youlbs could not sell millions on a capital of a few hundred dollars. „

Such llnctuations inevitaljly destroy legitimate grain bu.>ing for the jjui^ose of
holding for profit, whereas a few years since nii-n could be found at every village in the
producing districts who stored grain for an advance. Now, however, the buyer is so
thoroughly impressed with the danger arising from these fluctuations that he hastens to
sell his grain as soon as bought, and when shipping takes the precaution to sell to arrive,
using the wire to effect .«aies, afraid to trust the market for a single day.

So completely is the producer and distributor at the mercy oftho.se selling mere
figments that '-he packer daily buying a thonsand hogs, the products from which require
months to cure, is forced to seek protection against e.xcessive fluctuation by selling for
future delivery an amount of product equal to that from the hogs bought, and thusguard
against a possible loss resulting from fluctuations which the exercise of no amouut of
sound judgment will enable the business man to measure, as none can measure the vaga-
ries of a pit full of frantic speculators whose operations areas devoid of business delibera-
tion as of commercial morality.

The following telegram but faintly describes a scene in the provision pit, a scene
well worthy the pencil of a Hogarth:

"The provision pit on the Board of Trade, which has been almost deserted for sev-
eral weei(s, has been filled, since the opening of the Hoard this morning, with a Irantic
crowd of yelling betters. As soon as the Board opened it became ruuioied that there was
a "corner" in pork in contemplation, and a wild scramble of shorts to cover followed."

There is not an article that has known the blighting touch of the market-wrecking
short seller that it is not hazardous for the legitimate dealer to handle, and grain is made
a veritable shuttle-cock of by a body of men the majority of whom are known by the
suggestive title of "scalpers" and whose entire capital is barely sufficient to buy a Board
of Trade men.bership, or "margin" a purchase or two of fiat grain, and yet the Chicago
Board of Trade, in its memorial to Congress opposing the passage of the Butterworth
bill, says:

"The passage of this bill and its enforcement as a law would produce a commercial
convulsion amounting to a national calamity. It would be a vital attack upon the vi-iy
foundation principles of modern business methods and usages. Itwould lie hostile to I he
commercial genius and spirit of the age. It won! d destroy a vast system for the economical
handling of the agricultural products of the nation; asystem which is in entire harmony
with the progress of our civilization and whicli is a part of that civilization. It would
disastrously disturb tninsportation interests of every kind, and it would in many ways,
directly and indirectly, react injuriously upon the farnK-r, and that by the jjassage and
enforcement of the proposed law the farmer will be bereft of a market for his products."

Sucli assertions leave the onus of proof with the proponents, but a thorough ex-
amination of the memorial fails to disclose a single fact in support of such statements,
while it admits the pernicious character of option dealing and favors itssuppression when
carried on in bucket shops, where methods identical with those obtaining upon the Boards
of Trade are in vogue. Hence the layman naturally believes the bucket shop no worse
than the Board of Trade, and the Board of Trade enmity to the bucket shop to be the
outgrowth of rivalry iu business. The bucket shop being the logic;d corollary of option
dealing. When option sales cease on Boards of Trade the bucket shop will cease to exist.
Aside from its postulates the memorial is compounded in about equal parts of so
phiBticatious, pretended solicitude for the farmer and special pleadings for the continu-
ance of a system which the judgment of the people condemn and the abolition of which
would not cause even a ripple upon the stream of trade much less commercial convulsion.
When we reflect that only cotton, grain, hog products. cofTee and petroleum are the
subject of option sales, while thousands of other commodities are readily bought and sold
without the factitious aid of the market wrecking option dealer and have thus far escaped
the blighting eflfectsof board of trade methods and that the natural relation of supply and
demand determines the price for nearly all such articles, one cannot but hope that Con-
gress will, by the enactment of an effective measure, relegate the staples subject to board
of trade manipulation to such commercial methods as suDBce for all other commodities.

• I'-nnr

OV TBS

34

THE MARKET WRECKER— A MENACE.

Outside of New York, boards of trade furnish no information as lo the extent ot
option sales, but they are prodigious and exceed the entire product so dealt in many
thousand times, while the •' offerings" which do not mature into even option sales, are
hundBds of times as much as the option sales, and it is these limitless offers, as much as
sales, which depress prices. If salts were confined to actual commodities and delivay
neccssarilij followed maturity of contract, offers ivould be limited by the ainount availaOlt
for delivery. Now, however, it is not unusual for as much fiat wheat to be sold in a day
as there is of actual grain received in a year. For instance: On the 14th of April, 1890,
New York specnlators sold 44,000,000 bushels of fiat wheat, probably more than twice as
much as reached that city during the year. While the "offerings" in a single day, at
either Chicago or New York, are said to often exceed 300,000,000 bushels, such oflTeringa
having the intended effect of depressing prices. Although there is no means of determ-
ining the volume of such offerings or sales, yet we can get some idea from a few days op-
tion sales of wheat and cotton at New York, as set forth In the following table:

SALES AT NEW YORK.

WHEAT.

1890.

Aprils

April 9

April 12

April 14

September 3...
September 4...
September lo.

October 22

October 23

October 24

Sales of Ac-
tual Wheat
Bushels,

Bushels.

63,000

54,000

1,800

6,000

8,000

32,000

62,000

12,000

64,000

35,000

Total.,

I

337,800

Option Sales
of Fietit
ousAVheat
Bushels.

Bushels.

COTTON.

„ , , , Option S.'ilor
Sales of Ac- Jf j-jc ; , i.
lual Cotton. ous Coti.-n.

Bales.

18,400
2,000
10,080
44,000
8,000
6,400
7,240
4.(100
3,000,
4,600

.00(1
,00(t

000
,000

000
,000

000

000
,000

000

Bales.

125,720.000

369

1,.586
518
328
405

3.206

86,600
150 200

81,700
120,100

90,600
155,80a

684,000

This table shows that during the days named, that for each bushel of wheat sold
Now York market wreckers sold 372 bushels of liat grain, and for each bale of cotton 213
fictions, and that it would require bid 36 days for them to sell options equaling in, amount
an average wheat crop and 66 days to sell all the cotton grown in a year.

RECEIPTS AT CHICAGO.

FARM PRODUCTS.

FARM PRODUCTS.

THB SUBJECT OF OPTICS SALES.

WHICH ARE NOT SOLD AT OPTION.

Bbls . Bushels
and Lbs.

Value.

Bbls., No, Lbs.
and Tons.

Value.

Wheat

13,348,069
74,208,908
52,184,878

2,767.571
12,387.526

4 403 9fis

$ 12.094,000
33,395,(100

Flour

6,1.33,H08

2,707,627

4,921,712

1,575,(114

.55,333

105,402,121

52,611, (ISO

98,820,817

30,517,.316

325.000

$ 80,668,000

Corn

Cattl->*

116,619.000

Oats

15,655 000

54,222,000
6,000,000
5,000,000

Rye

Barlev

1,660,000
7,432,000
6,071,000 i
4,500,000 !
17,945.000
11,760,000
6,100,000

Sheei)

Hor.«es

Butter

Flax Seed

21,180,000

Grass .Seed...] 1,500,000
Barrel Pork.. .54 451

Chec-e

Hides

4,735,000
8,000,000

146,728,592

70,.885,797

Wool

6,500,000

Lard

Hav

3,500,000

•*

Total values..

$106,612,000 il -1

$256,324,000

•Including calves.

THE MARKET WRECKER— A MENACE. 35

That f.irm products c^n be readily marketed without the aid of option sales is made
manifest in the foregoing table conipilod from the report of the Chicago Board of Trade
which table shows that of $3(i.'>,000,000 worth of staple farm products shipped to and
thronu'li Chicago in 1888, but 29.3 i)er cent, were articles subject to option sales, while 70.7
per cent, were sold without aids which the Boards of Trade would fain have us believe
are necessary to the farmer's continued existence.

The market wreckers lay great stress upon the difHculty of selling grain by sample,
stating such to be the alternative in case purely speculative contracts are prohibited, but
sample sales would be no more common than now, as as all grain below grade is sold by
sample, as is much of the grade grain sold for cash, and grain will continuetobe inspected
and sold by grade; still, if necessary, the $12,000,000 worth of wheat reaching Chicigo
could be sold by .sample as readily as the iS21, 000,000 worth of butter, ascould the $15,000,-
000 worth of oats as well as the •fH, 500,000 worth of hides and wool, each hide and fleece
being subject to separate inspection, as is every package of butter, while grain is inspected
and sampled by car loads.

To the $256,000,000 in value of farm products shown to be exempt from option sales
should be added at least $50,000,000 worth of diessed beef and hogs, milk, poultry, eggs,
fruit, vegetables and vast quantities of other products of the iarm marketed at or through
Chicago, justifying the assumption that of the farm products reaching the great market,
fully three-fourths enter into consumption without assistance from this peculiar commer-
cial method.

The report of the Chicago Board of Trade for 1888 shows that during the five years
ending with 1888, there was grown 11,040,000,000 bushels of wheat and corn, of which
1,077,000,000, or 9.8 per cent. only,.reached the eight interior Board of Trade markets and
much of this was counted twice, as grain is shifted from one such market to another, and
Chicago and other cities include in their receipts the produce in transit. The grain reaclr
ing the seaboard markets cannot be counted as it has been included once, if not twice, at
interior pohits, hence it follows that Boards of Trade aid to the extent of 'ins thantcn
per cent, in marketinq farm, products, and granting the substantial correctness of estimates
by an eminent merchant — who yearly distributes millions of dollars worth of farm pro-
ducts to commerce — "that the eflf'ect of option sales is to reduce, by more than ten per
cent., the value of all grain, cotton and swine grown, and that in the past ten years the
farmers of the United States would have received $1,000,000,000 more for their products
had not short selling become a prominent and profitable method of fixing values."

The farmer would be the gainer if every Board of Trade and the option dealing
market wreckers were sunk at the bottom of the sea and 9.8 per cent, of his grain and
cotton was permitted to rot in the field, thereby saving the cost of harvesting ;iud mar
keting that percentage while the remainder would sell for more than would the whole if
subjected to the baleful touch of the market wreckers; hence it cannot work a hardship to
the producer to be bereft of the option dealer's market.

If 90.2 per cent, of the grain grown and 75 per cent, of all farm products reaching
the large cities can be readily sold without being madefoot-balls of by bands of speculators
why not the small remainder?

If the 27,000,000 bushels of whe.at which reached Chicago during the year in the
form of flour could be readily and ecouomically handled without being made the subject
of option sales, why not the 13,000,000 bushels which reached the same market in its
primary form?

If Chicago can, without the aid of option dealers, furnish buyers for $54,000,000
worth of pork in the form of swine, why should it be essential to the farmer's prosper-
ity that the $26,000,000 worth In secondary form should be subject to the option dealer's
manipulation?

It is readily seen why flour and swine eBcape the direct touch of the market wreck-
ers. The moment wheat is converted into flour and marked with the miller's brand, it is
severed from the mass of indistinguishable grain and assumes an individual character
and the option dealer having the hardihood to sell 10,000 barrels of "Pillsbury'e Best *
short would find himself at the mercy of the miller owning such brand.

36 THE MARKET WRECKER— A MENACE.

Yet the price of flour is determined by the option dealer's manipulation of tht
wheat market.

Although swine cannot be shipped to marlcel, stored and advances procured,— as
the market wreckers assure us is necessary in order to enable the farmer to market bii
products— and their inclination to run violently down a steen hill prevents the option
dealer from including them in his short sales, the farmer m nuges to market his swine
(and other animals) quite as readily and profital^ly as he does his grain. Unable to sub-
ject the hi)g to his methods, the option dealer makes ample amends when the animal has
been converteil into secondary product, but it is singular, that while he sells pork, lard
and bacon short, such parts of the swine as canvassed ham, sausage, pig's feet, etc.. must be
disposed of by such methods as obtained in the commercial world prior to the evolution
of the option dealer, and yet such dealer's pernicious arts aCTect the market for the animal
most injuriously, as the price of the hog is directly related to that for the pa<'l;ing-house
products' over which the option dealer holds a sway.

Aside from farm products, in primary and secondary form, the s:ilcsof nierchandise
in Chicago, — at wholesale — during 1888 amounted to $437,500,000, all of which wasi mar-
keted withdut aid from the option dealer.

15y re;isiin of its being the largest market for farm products and the number, ac-
tivity ntid supreme audacity of its speculators, Chicago has become the most potent factor
infixing the prices for such Ti)roducta, and yet (hat city handles less t/ian four per cent,
of the wheat and corn grown, its power in this direction being out of all proportion to
the volume of products h ludled, and is directly attributable ^to and in exact ratio to the
enormousqnatititiesof fictitiiius St utr constantly pressed upon the market, and it is the daily
offering, selling and buyingoftlie.se figments, in million on million of units, that enables
a few men, possessed of capital and credit sufficient to "margin " millions of such ficti-
tious commodities, to dominate the markets of the country and determine prices.

If the system which creates and perpetuates sucli con Ulions is an outgrowth of
civilization, no less so arc lotteries, dram shops, pool selling and anarchism, but a major-
ity of citizens believe one and all are excrescences to which the knife should be applied
without liesitation.

Because certain methods are the outgrowth of civilization it does not follow that
they are benign, and there is abundent evidence that the baleful results of option dealing
are incomparably greater than tlioseattending the unrestricted sale of lottery tickets, as the
lottery, aside from its corruption of public morals, aflccts only those who voluntarily be-
come its votaries, while Board of Trade dealing in fictitious commodities is as much a
game of chance as is the lottery, and not only debauches the morals of those who actively
participate, but affects the prosperity of every cultivator, as well as that of every one
having business relations with him.

From the planting of the seed until the cio]) is garnered and sold, the speculator
pursues it with misrepresentations which are intended to and do lessen the selling price
of farm products, but should the making of contracts for future delivery, other than by
owners or prt)ducers of commodities, be prohibited as against public policy, the interest,
prompting the propagation of false reports would disappear.

The following from a dealer in varitable products outlines the situation:

"I am a commission merchant, receiving from the West car-loads of grain to sell.
For every bushel sold l)y actual shippers hundreds are sold "short" by sijcculators and it
Is a fact, that almost all the so called grain speculators in Chicago aie short .sellers and so
far from trying to advaui-e prices are constantly endeavoring to depress them. A few
years since Chicago was calloLl a ])roducers' market, but now it it recogniwii as the great
bear market of /he world with a large m;ijoiity of the dealers and a prepouderence of the
capital <.f the Board of Trade on the bear side."*

/■•i it not strange, that a city adjacent to the producing dist7-icts and (he natural en-
trepot for (he grain, produced, should be decrying the value of xuhat we in (he West have to
sell, and is it not anomalous that most of the articles in the press are bear articles, and
lastly is there any other country, with a surplus to sill, that is constantly trying to depress
the value of that surplusf

* 'Oomiiilfsiun Uerohant" In Chicago Tribune. January 11

THE FARMER, THE INVESTOR AND THE RAILWAY.

Agriculture li;ivinu; been the first industry of settled life, we may assume that the
farmer lias pursued his calling since Ihe dawu of civilization; yet, necessary as have been
such labors, lie has borne mauy burdens from which liis brothers have been exempt,
doubtless owing to tlie dilHculty e.\|ierienced in forming comliinations with his lellowa
for concerted action, wliile those representing aggregates of capital, being comparatively
few in numbers, easily edect such combinations. This is es|)eeially true of llie present
era, and of tlioae controlling the great mass of capital represented by the railways of the
country, nominally amounting to $9,369,000,000; and appearing to equal 60 |ier cent, while
being not over 30 per cent, of the capital invested in farms, yet the influence exerted
upon economic and other questions by railway owners and farmers is in an inverse ratio
to their respective numbers and the magnitude of their investments.

One is a compact force, disciplined, alert, living in the midst of the greatest activi-
ties: tlie other exceedingly more numerous, undisciplined, leading isolated lives and with
few incentives to quickening thought.

Those familiar with the history of the last sixty years will not question the great
benefits resulting from the construction of railways, or grudge the men who have carried
forward these great undertakings a rich reward.

By the aid of the railway the wilderness has been madeproductive, countless farms
brought within reach of the great markets, mines opened, mills, factories and forges built,
towns and cities brought into existence and populous Stales carried to a higher develop-
ment than would have been possible in centuries without such aids. Such are but a part
of the beneficent results flowing from the construction of the railway.

While the builders of the railway have been exploiting a continent and piling up
the greatest fortunes ever known, the farmer has taken an unproductive wilderness and
literally hewn his way through the great forests which clothed seaboard and central
region to the open prairie, there developing the most productive of States, continued his
toilsome march up the arid slopes, scaled the mountains and planted orchard, vineyard
and farm by the shores of the Western Ocean.

His labors have enabled the nation to flood the markets with a plethora of bread,
meat and fiber; to meet the enormous expenditure of a devastating war; to repair the
losses and havoc of those bloody days, and then to turn the balance of trade in our favor.
Willingly has the farmer performed this labor, expecting to share in the prosperity
of the country, yet not always content with his part of the rewards, and coming to be-
lieve that those controlling the carriage of his products were exacting as toll more than a
just proportion thereof. He has seen the carrier yearly adding to his property, building
new lines from the tolls collected on the old, increasing his wealth and powerand leaving
a constantly lessening proportion of the proceeds arising from the sale of farm products
to the grower. As population has increased railway property has grown in relative value,
as has tlie power of those controlling it, and this increase has been very largely made
from revenues derived from tolls levied to pay interest and dividends on the water in the
bonds and shares, hence made at the expense of railway users, a large part of whom are
farmers.

All are fairly prosperous except such as are engaged in the basic industry of civil-
ization, and the one cloud in the industrial horizon is the unsatisfactory condition of a
large part of an agricultural population uuiTiberiug some 25,000,000, and the railway
is chargeable with so much of this as results from the exaction of unjust tolls, and this
inquiry is instituted for the purpose of ascertaining if the complaints, as to the unreason-
ableness of such charges, are well grounded.

The highe-it tribunals hold that railways are public trusts, and can exercise the
power to enter upon and take private property solely in their public character; and that
the exercise of such exceptional power can be defended only upon the ground that the
good of the public can best be subserved by a corporation under obligation to treat all
justly in rendering services which each citizen cannot perform for himself; that the State
could perform the functions delegated to railway corporations, which are trusts organized

38 THE FARMER, THE INVESTOR AND THE RAILWAY.

for the service of the public and charged with remuneration for the private capital em-
ployed; that the corporatiops thus endowed must provide all needed facilities for con-
ducting speedily the business for which they are created; and that the charge for the
services rendered sliall be no more than just and reasonable; and the Federal courts have
not hesitated to deteiiuine what was ajust and reasonable charge.

The courts hold that rates lixed by the State are prima facie reasonable, and while
railway companies cannot'be barred from showing the unreniu iterative character of such'
rates, they can only do so by disclosing — in addition to the cost of maintenance and
operation — the exact cost of the plant employed, and that in arriving at such cost account
can be taken only of monies actually exjjended in construction and cciuipnieut. Railway
companies have evinced no desire to make disclofures of this character, although it would
be easy in this way to show that the schedule of rates established by the State was unre-
nnmerative, if such was the case.

The cost of maintaining and operating any given railway is re.adily ascertainable,
and it should be equally easy to determine its cost, but such a procedure is surrounded
with grave difficulties — diflioulties growing out of syndicates and construction companies,
tlie manufacture of securities, of boi.d and stock waterings, the purchase a)\d construc-
tion of branch lines at low cost and unloading upon the stockholders at high cost, stock
and scrip dividends, bonus* of stock to purchaser of bonds, bonds sold to pay unearned
divideuds that much stock may be unloaded at high prices h. la Waliash, the hnibiing of
branch lines at low cost, capitalizing at high cost, and covering resulting profits into the
treasury of the parent company tc be distributed as dividends, and forever taxing the
railway user to pay ill teresi and dividends on the profits thus enjoyed, as well as by a
thousand and one other shady devices by which water is added to the basic power of
levying tolls and increasing the amount upon which the public is expected to furnish the
means of paying interest and dividends.

The cost of the railway is known only to its managers, and rarely to them, as the
constructors but seldom retain the management and railway accounts are manipulated in
numberless peculiar ways for the sophistication of investors. For instance, on page 184
of the 1889 report of the Kansas Railroad Commissioners there is appended to the state-
ment of bonded indebtedness, made by the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe, this note:
"The early records of the Company are very incomplete and it is impossible to tell, with
any accuracy, the amount realized from the issue of these bonds," i. <\, $14,061,500 of
first mortgage, land grant and consolidated bonds. Another typical case is that of a rail-
way company in whose service was the writer, and which built a costly line of passenger
steamers for lake service; but, by reason of the building of railways north and south of
the lake, the operation of the line became unprofitable, the steamers were dismantled,
engines sold and the great sum they represented dropped from the annual report of the
company without a word of explanation.

Managers dealing thus with stockholders, are not likely to be more frank with the
public. Indeed the cost of the railway, and the manipulations of such cost, areof the pro-
fessional secrets which are employed to defraud railway users and investors, and a case or
two in point may not be uninteresting, as showing some of the processes adopted in the
manufacture and marketing of stocks and bonds, which are so frequently but evidences
of corporate fraud, rather than ownership.

An illustration of the ease with which investor and user are alike plundered is
found in the case of a corporation controlling a vuhialile dividend-paying proi>erty,
which another compan J' parallels with expectation of profits only from construction, and
by forcing a sale— eventually efltected— to the older company, the result being the trebling
of railway capital without an increase of traffic.

Another form of corporate fraud is the payment of unearned dividends from the
proceeds of bonds sold, thus adding to the capitalization and necessitating the collection
of unjust tolls to pay interest. Tliese fraudulent payments are often made to enable the
management to foist upon the public immensu issues of worthless shares, such

*The .Santa Fe and otbei' companies have given as a bunus as much as ten shares of stocic with
each $1,000 bond sold.

TnE FARMER, THE INVESTOR AND THE RAILWAY. 39

dividends being eontiimeil as long us bonds can be sold and a market found for tbe stock,
and when one of these bubbles is aliout to burst, the manipulators make further vast
profits by selling "short" and then liaving disclosures made of tlie hopeless condition of
the corporate finauces.

Yet another form of corporate fraud is the purchase or construction of cheap branch
lines, and selling them at two, three or four times their cost to Hie Company of whose
interests the profiting parties are the trustees. Sometimes these lines are consolidated with
that of the parent company and new issues of securities made to cover the added mileage,
while in other cases the olil company enables the schemers to sell immense issues of the
shares and bonds of tbe auxiliary line at bij.'h prices by guaranteeing the bonds of the
latter and leasing its road at an exorbitant rental. Loadect down in this way the old
company frequently ceases to pay dividends.

Again tbe parent comjiauy re.solves itself info a construction company and covers
Into its treasury tbe profits arising from the construction of cheap branches. For in-
stance, it is shown on pane 391 of the 1SS;» report of the Kansas Railroad Commissioners
that the St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company derived a profit of $07,871 from
the construction of ten and one-half miles of roaJ that should not have cost over $10,000
per mile, but which, with this profit added and stock issued for a nominal consideration,
is capitalized for $28,845 per mile. This company has built many hundred miles in recent
years, and construction profits have aided in the paymentof dividends on preferred stock,
while providing a basis for levying, for all time, tolls to pay interest and dividends on the
bonds and stock representing the profits divided. Thus, the greater the profits from con-
struction, the greater the sums which can hereafter be extorted from the user of the
railway.

^Poor's Manual shows that to make contemplated extensions the stock of the Mis-
-sonri Pacific was, during 18S6-87, increased J15, 000,000, and the funded debt 1514,376,000,
and while the capitalization of the parent company was thus increased $29,376,000, t the
lines built or purchased were capitalized from $8,000 to $.'i2,000 per mile, the result of such
multiple capitalization being to add an immense amount of water to old as well as new
issues. There are some very instructive phases of the construction of this new mileage.
For instance, the 310 miles of the auxiliary Fort Scott, Wichita & Western is shown by
Mr. Poor to have cost |;4,666,000; the funded debt is shown by Kansas Railroad Commis-
sion to be $5,666,000, and Mr. Poor shows that ^4,666,000 of such bonds are deposited with
tbe Union Trust Comiany to secure |i4,666,000 of Missouri Pacific trust mortgage bonds
issued to (irovide the $4,6(i6,000 which the road is said to have cost. Has the user of this
railway a right to ask what became of tbe other $1,000,000 of mortgage bonds and the
$7,000,000 of capital stock upon which rates are based, and which make up a capitalization
of $8,000,000 in excess of cost, and-what was the consideration therefor?

In the case of the 411 miles of the Missouri Pacific's Denver, Memphis & Atlantic
line, Mr. Poor shows the cost to have been $4,920,000, and Kansas report shows bonded
debt to be $6,561,000, the first mortgage bonds exceeding the cost by $1,641,000 and the
entire capitalization being $8,202,000 in excess of cost, a large part of which was borne by
the municipalities along the line. Like conditions obtain with all Missouri Pacific lines
built of late years except two short ones not yet mortgaged.

Another mode of collecting excessive tolls and defrauding the public is that prac-
ticed by the subsidized Pacific lines in jmying $900,000 per annum to tbe Pacific Mail
Steamship (Company to forego competition, and then charging the public two or three
times this sum to recoup themselves for such illegal diversion of corporate funds.

A unique case is that of an Ohio corporation, where the men who afterwards be-
came the directors and managers gave their notes lo certain bankers for money borrowed
for the purpose of buying the shares which were to give them control of the corporation,
aiid, having by this means secured control, applied — in whole or in part — to the payment
of suchnotes the first mortgage bonds of tbe company to the amount of -?S. 000, 000, although

•"Poor'.s Man ii.il" is a compendium of such flnancial and traffic statements as tlie railway cona-
p.Tnies prepare for publication.

tAugust, 1-90 It is now stated that the Missouri Pacific has added $30,000,000 to its capitalization.

40 THE FARMER, THE INVESTOR AND THE RAILWAY.

such bonds hail, in corvipliance with the requirements of the statutes of Ohio, been issued
for the express purpose of equipuifUls, double tracks and other betternients.*

Many auxiliary lines have been built at costs ranging from $S.O0O to $15,000 per
mile, and capitalized at two, three, four, and even five limes their cost, as in the case of
the 107 miles of the Kansas IMidland, costing, iucluding a small equipment, but $10,200
per mile, of which 30 per cent, was furnished by the municipalities along its line; yet
with construction profits and other devices this road shows a capitalization of $33,000 per

mile.

Or take the 1,055 miles in Kansas of the Chicago, Kansas & Nebraska, built by the
Chicago Rock Island & Pacific in much the same way and capitalized for ?.33,000 per
mile. Kansas municipalities aided to the extent of $2,500 per mile in building this road,
receiving the stock of the company in exchange for municipal bonds. Now, however,
foreclosure proceedings are pending in the interest and at the procurement of the parent
company (which owns, practically, all the bonds and stock of the auxiliary line except
the stock issued to the municipalities) whereby the municipalities are to be despoiled of
this $2,500,0U0.i

This is no uncommon device for plundering the farmer and other tax-payers; and
railway presidents, directors and managers, who would scorn to put their hands into the
pocket of the farmer and abstract a (single) silver dollar, rarely hesitate when, by the
devices described, they can take from the same farmer and his congeners a lump sum of
$2,500,000, and the successful workers of such schemes, by one and the same act, acquire
vast sums and a reputation for great financial abilitj'.

Another type is found iu the Marion & McPherson line of the Atchison, Topeka &
Santa Fe,t built largely from old and much worn material, and originally capitalized for
$28,000 per mile, being more than three times its cost. Under the recent re-organization
of the Santa Fe each mile represents a much larger sum; but how much larger I am un-
able to ascertain from the accounting officers of that company, to whom application was
made for definite information.

Other Santa Fe lines show peculiar phasesof railway administration. Forinstance,
the Santa Fe, .jointly with the St. Louis & San Francisco, built the Wichita & Western,
extending 125 miles through a sparsely settled district and not paying operatingespenses;
yet the Santa Fe, although having another and parallel line — the Southern Kansas — less
than twenty-four miles south of the Wichita & Western, doubly paralleled itself by
building a third line between the two, this third line, for one hundred miles, being eight
to fourteen miles from the Wichita & Western on the north, and, for seventy miles, but
ten to sixteen from the Southern Kansas on the south.

In this way has money been wasted in construction, the farmer unneccs'^arily bur-
dened, the parent company loaded with an immense unproductive mileage, and rendered
unable to paj' fi.xed charges, and thousands of those investing in its securities reduced to
sore straits, the reason for all of which is propably to be found in the profits — private or
corporate — growing out of construction.

Perhaps the Santa Fe affords as fair an illustration as can be found of the ease with
which twelve men, sitting in directors' chairs, cau issue an edict for the creation of an
hundred million or more of fiat property, the only evidence of the existence of which is
found in reams of paper, and afTording additional evidence of the great and growing
utility of printer's ink as an instrument of advanced civilization. By this simple pro-
cess, and without any addition to the property of the corporation, the liabilities of the
Santa Fe have been increased more than $100,000,000, and while rates of interest may
have been scaled down, the total of interest and principal have been scaled up. When
an individual or firm falls creditors usually accept large reductionsof principal in adjust-
ment; but when a railway company like the Santa Fe fails they insist on doubling the
principal and increasing the total of interest.

Although the earnings of the Santa Fe, in 1888, amounted to 12,914 529 less than

operating expenses and fixed charges, the managers paid an unearned dividend off2,625,-

»See llic seventli .annual report, of tlio Columbns, Mookhiff V.Tlley A Toledo K.nilway Company,
flv hown as 1 In' "Atchison" in New England and as the "Santa Fe" lu the West.
jsince tiie publication of this article In the ".Vrcna" the railway has heen sold under decree ot
foreclosnre and the municipalities deprived of their slock.

THE FARMER, THE INVESTOR AND THE RAILWAY. 41

;K)0, which, with other enormous additions to tlie li;ilnlities, sire to bean endless burden
upon railway users and the warrant Cor the exaction ol' unjust tolls.

The Santa Fe's recently acquired control of the St. Louis & San Franii.-iv' lines--
which are to he operated as a distinct properly— is a remarkable instance of the lial pi..-
oess of multiplying securities without tlie addition of a dollar's worth to the world's
(took of property.

The St. Louis & San Francisco controlled 1,329* miles of railway, capitalized for
the enormous sum of ?70,402,800, being $52,200 per mile. The Santa Fe acquired control
of this property by issuing $::6,lS5,175 of new Santa Fe stock, not to retire the stock of
the "Frisco," but to buy it and place it in the treasury of tlie Santa Fe and applyt such
.lividends as may accrue to the payment of current Santa Fe liabilities.

The result to the railway user will be that, whereas the "Frisco" property has been
represented by ?70, 402,800 of "Frisco" and auxiliary stocks and bonds, it is now repre-
sented by that sum plus $26,285 175 of Santa Fe stock, which is an addition of fictitious
capital upon which the user is expected to furnisli revenue, and the owners of Santa Fe
shares have that amount of water iujected into their holdings.

tThe Santa Fe holds 741,129i shares, of the par value of $73,112,950, of stock of
auxiliary lines built wholly from land grants, municipal aid, and proceeds of bonds sold,
and for this immense number of shares the only consideration — as shown by the Santa
Fe ledger— was |4,0::i), or a fraction over half of one cent a share. For 663,300* of these
shares, of the par value of $66,330,650, the only consideration shown is $15.00, being at
the rate of 44.22 shares of the par value of $4,422.00 for one cent. Such is the stuff
which passes current as railway securities and ou which the railway user is taxed to pay
dividends.

The Santa Fe aflords a most instructive example of what may be accomplished in
the way of multiplying securities by the hoodooing? of accounts, by reckless construc-
tion, the payment of stock dividends ($18,000,000), the giving of vast quantities of stock
to the purchases of bonds, the payment of unearned dividends and the creation of $100,-
000,000 and more of fiat securities at one or two sittings.

The seventy miles of the Columbus & Cincinnati Midland, built at a cost of about
$17,000 per mile— of which some $1,500 per mile was donated by the people along its line
— is capitalized at $57,000 per mile and earns nearly twelve per cent, on the money fur-
nished by its builders, yet appears to earn but three per cent., while in its immense
fictitious capital the foundation is laid for further exactions.

The enormous profits accruing from the operation of the construction company,
and the unjust tax thereby forever imposed upon the public, is exemplified in the case of
the "Credit Mobilier" and other construction devices connected with the building of the
various Pacific lines, out of which grew no little corruption of legislators, the ruiu, po-
litically, of promising statesmen, and the amassing of so many great fortunes, typified in
the case of the four meu who built the Central Pacific and whose united worldly posses-
sions in 1860 are said tohave been but .•t;120,000. Now, however, their estates are estimated
at more than $120,000,000.

Mr. Poor states that "the cost per mile of the roads making returns (1888) as meas-
ured by the amount of their stocks and indebtedness equaled nearly $60,732 as against
$58,603 for 1SS7," being an increase of .'?2,129 per mile, and at the price recently prevailing,
it would require 135,000,000 bushels of the farmers' corn annually to pay o per cent. <>n
the water absorbed by railway securities in one year, and by such waterings yearly itwill
take but fourteen years to absorb the entire corn crop to provide revenue ou the added
fluid. How long shall this process be permitted to continue?

Mr. Poor also states that, in the eleven central farming States, railway earnings
have in eighteen years increased 175 per cent; yet he forgets to tell us that such has been
the shrinkage in the prices of farm products that the value of the wheat and corn crops
in these States increased but 57 per cent., showing conclusively that the railways are

•Incluilesuch lines .as the Kan.sas Midland, etc., built at costs ranging from $10,000 to 813,000 per mile.
tKinaiicial Chronicle of jMay ai, leso.
Jl'oor's Manual , 18BU, page 7;3.
gAnie, pu^ea.

42 THE FARMER, THE INVESTOR AND THE RAILWAY.

taking a constantly increasing: proportion of the proceeds arising from the sale of the
products of the farm.

This is still more clearly shown on the same page In the statement that in these
Slates railvA'ay revenue in 1870 was $12 for each unit of the population as against $18 in
1SS8. Thus the per capita transportation tax is shown to have increased 50 per cent.

Mr. Poor says: "With these facts before us, it is difficult to understand the extraor-
■dinary antipathy to railroad corporations in the West."

If such antipathy exists, probably Mr. Poor could understand it if he would but
look at these facts, and others herein stated, in all their nakedness, keeping in view their
true bearing upon the greatest of the nation's industries.

That no such antipathy exists is shown by the fact that, while the railways of Illi-
nois are capitalized for 142,450 per mile, they are assessed for purposes of taxation ai
$7,863 per mile; those of Iowa are capitalized at $38,069, and assessed at $5,189; those of Ne^
braska are capitalized at .$40,172, and assessed at $5,829, and thoseof Kansas are capitalized
at $52,155, and assessed at $6,595 per mile.

We have seen some of the processes by which the investor is shorn and an enormous
fictitious capitalization piled up to aid in taxing the farmer and others. Is it any wonder
that when his wares are selling at starvation prices the farmer becomes restive under the
burdens thus imposed and .seeks to replace present ownership by that of the nation?

According to Mr. Poor, there existed 156,082 miles of railway at the close of 1888,
showing a capitalization — including floating debts — of $9,367,398,954, to pay interest and
dividends on which a toll is levied on all the industries of the country.

How much of this vast capitalization is real, and how much the fictitious outgrowth
of the practices described?

Owing to the practices illustrated, it is impossible for railway companies to show
the cost of their properties, and we are compelled to reach an approximation by estimat-
ing such cost, and thus determining the sum upon which revenue should accrue.

ESTIMATED COST FEB MILE OF EXISTING RAILWAYS.

Grubbing and clearing $ 100

Right of way and land damage 2,500

Earthwork and rock cuttings 4,500

Bridges, culverts and masonry 3 000

Ties— 3,000 2,000

Rails, splices, bolts and spikes 4,000

Switches, side-tracks, caitle-guards, road crossings and fences 1,100

Track laying, surfacing and ballasting 2,300

Depots, water tanks, stock yards, shops and terminals 3,500

E(iuipment 4,ft0n

Engineering, rents, interest, taxes and contingencies 2,:0)

Total cost per mile $30,000

*That this estimate is more than ample is assured by the statement (in substance) of
of Mr. H. V. Poor that the capitalization of the roads built from 18S0 to 1883 is double the
actual investment and, could the fictitious capital be eliminated, railways, as investments,
would have no parallel; and in the statement that within five years ending in 1683,
"about 40,000 miles of line were constructed at a cash cost of at least $1,100,000,000," being
$27,000 per mile; and that "in 1884 only about 4,000 miles of new line were constructed,
the cost of which did not exceed $20,000 per mile and perhaps not over $15,000 per mile."

For each mile of railway costing more than $30,000 per mile ten can be found that
have cost from $8,000 to $20,000. Theeastern two hundred miles of the Kansas division
of the Union Pacific, built in the era of high prices, cost less than $20,000, although now
bearing a capitalization of $105,000 per mile, but a well known manipulator — who made
restitution of millions to the Erie— supervised its reorganization, which may account for
the generous volume of water incorporated in its securities.

The Missouri Pacific line form El Dorado to McPherson, Kansas, a comparatively
expensive prairie road, being located across the line of drainage, cost much less thaa
$10,000 per mile, as have thousands of miles of other prairie lines.

•See Poor's Manual for 1881 and 18SS.

THE FAKMER, THE INVESTOR AND THE RAILWAY. 43

Possibly $30,000 per mile is less than it would cost to duplicate the railways east of
the Ohio, but the most of the mileage being west of that region, where the cost, outside
of H few mountain roads, is at :i minimum, the estimate, if erroneous, certainly errs in
pUu'ing the cost too high. Moreover, we have a factor of safety in the fact that the n.Tlion,
to aiil in building railways, has granted 197,000,000 acres of land, a large part of wh.ch
Las passed into the possession of the railway companies, and from which they have
realized vast sums, probably more than 5^."00.000.000, to which should be added Slate and
municipal aid and individual donations to the amount of $1.50,000,000 to $2)0,000,000.

Taking no account of the sums loaned the Pacific railways, the people have con-
tributed at least $2,000 per mile towards the cost of existing railways, hence we are war-
ranted in assuming that $.'>0,000 per mile is I lie maximum sum on which the user should
furnish revenue, less such revenue as the corporations derive from rents, interests and
dividends, from lands, buildings, railways, slocks or bonds bought or brought into ex-
istence by ati expenditure of any part of such 630,000 per mile or the earnings therefrom,
such revenue, aside fnim traffic earnings, being now about .f90,000,000 per annum.

It is claimed that in determining the amount of capital on which the rates of toll
shall be based, the people are en til led to no voice, but as the compensation is to be reason-
able and the measure of such compensation being the cost of maintaining and operating
the railway plus a fair return for the ciipital actually employed, the people are unques-
tionably entitled to a voice in determining what such compensation shall be and how it
shall be arrived at. and their representatives will find the railways havecost nottoexceed
an average of $30,000 per mile, and could be duplicated forenough less to more than ofl'set
the enhancement in the value of right of way, depot grounds and terminals.

Railways well located and mortgaged for 80 per cent, or less of actual cost can dis-
pose of three and one-half to four and one-half per cent, bonds at par, but badly located
or poorly managed roads often failing to pay interest, we may call live per cent, a fair
rate, and on this basis the annual net revenue of roads existing at the close of 1888, from
traffic, rents, interest, dividends and all other sources, should not exceed $234,123,000,
being $67,408,000 less than the net traffic earnings reported by Poor, and taking the net
■earnings ($405,220,000) as shown by the Inter-State Commission, the excess is $171,097,000
wrongfully extorted from the agricultural and other industries in one year.

This difference in the amount of net earnings arises from the fact that, in Poor's
Manual, only traffic earnings are tabulated,* no account being taken of the immense
sums railway companies derive from rents of lands, buildings, track and terminals, as
well as in the form of dividends on stocks and bonds owned, and the profits from the
sale of such securities, all amounting to vast sums and yearly increasing as the railways
become consolidated and absorb more and more of existing property; hence Mr. Poor's
figures are incomplete and misleading, inasmuch as they fail to convey a correct idea of
the total of railway earnings or the amount annually extorted from the user.

Of the $234,123,000 resulting from a five per cent, revenue on $30, 000 per mile, a very
l;irge part, as will hereafter be shown, belongs to the user rather than the investor, while
many parallel roads, built for construction profits, are needless, and others so badly
located that the traffic will be wholly insufficient to provide revenue, and the owners
must, like the owners of badly located buildings, sutler the loss entailed by lack of busi-
ness sagacity. Favorably located roads can collect more than five percent.; should they
be permitted to do so? Each railway company is a distinct organization, each road a
separate instrument and specially conditioned, and it is questionable if the compensation
for the capital employed should, in any case, be permitted to exceed the rates fixed upon,
from time lo time, us a just return. As interest rates fall, so should returns from railway
investments.

Justice and reason appear to have little part in determining railway rates, the en-
vironments being all potent, as in the States where efficient granger lawsf have been re"
inforced by a strong and active commission rates are much the lowest, and highest where

•Pase 4 of the l,nti-oduction of Manual for IS8'J.

fGranger laws" are the laws enacted in the agricultural .States of the Mississippi Valley for the
•r,*>«-oi of railway rates and metliods.

.,)

44 THE FARMER, THE INVESTOR AND THE RAILWAY.

either the laws or the commission are ineffecieut; yet enough has been accomplished to
show the beiieficeut possibilities of governmental control in suppressing snnie of the
multifarious evil practices of railway companies, and while these practices continue they
are much less common and not so flagrant as in the past, when the manager of an Inter.
State railway, in order to destroy the value of the property of a coal company having no
other outlet for its product, could, without a minute's notice, advance the rates on coal
shipped by such company 133 per cent, above the rates charged another coal company in
which such railway company and its officers were stockholders; nor, with the Inter-State
law in force, are railway ofltieials likely to repeat the indiscretion of such manager in
writing the president of a coal company (of whose property he desired to force a sale) the
subjoined letter:

St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Company,
Office of the Second Vice-President and General, Manager,
St. Louis, Mo., February 9th, 1882.
President PUtaburg Conl Company, Pittsburg, Kansas:

Dear Sir — I will pass through Pittsburg about 12 o'clock on Monday next, and
would be glud to have you join me at Pittsburg, and go to Qirard, and back to Pittsburg.

If we can buy your coal at a low price, I think we can possibly make a deal on that
basis.

As long as you continue shipping coal, it has a demoralizing effect on the trade,
and renders the coal business unprofitable, to a certain extent, to the "Rogers Coal
Company," Respectfully, C. W. Rogers,

Second Vice-Pres't and Oen'l Manager.

Discriminations and other fraudulent practices, whereby the few are enriched at
the expense of the public, doubtless continue, and will until railway managers thus be-
traying their trusts are sent to keep company with the men who plundered the Ocean ^
Fidelity and Sixth Avenue banks; but there is, as compared with the time preceding the
enactment of Inter-State and State laws, but little of the work of discrimination in pro.
gress; and great as is this evil, it is trivial as compared with those growing out of a
capitalization excessive by more than one-half, and which is the warrant for annually
levying an immense sum in unjust tolls, by which producer and consumer are alike de-
spoiled of a large part of their earnings.

If the courts are right in holding that the carrier is entitled to but a reasonalile
compensation, and that the reasonableness of the charge rests upon the cost of mainten-
ance, operation and the amount actually Invested in the plant, then the exaction of
existing rates of toll is wholly indefensible. Asa bar to the rendering of Justice to the
user, the plea is made that should rates be reduced to what would afltbrd but a fair return
for the actual cost of the plant, it would work great hardships to the present holders of
railway securities, who are assumed to have bought them in good faith, and many of
whom are widows, orphans, trustees and institutions In which the poor have deposited
their scanty savings. Has this plea against justice any basis except one of sentiment?
If sentiment and a charitable regard for the poor and helpless shall govern, are there not
twelve times as many widows orphans and poor among the 60,000,000 of railway users?

From the fact that there are 10,000 holders of New "Vork Central stock, Mr. Poor
estimates that there are 1,000,000 investors in railway securities, who, with their depend-
ents, constitute a body of 5,000,000, and it is proposed that rather than this one-thirteenth
shall surrender, once for all, so much of their power to tax others as is the direct product
of fr.aud, they shall continue such unjust taxation.

This is not simply a proposition that one-thirteenth of the population shall unjustly
tax all others this year, next year, or even the third or fourth .year, but that such burden,
yearly increasing by the addition of more water, shall becarried by the twelve-thirteenths
to their graves; that when death relieves them, their children and children's children for
countless generations, shall each in its turn take up the grievous burden and carry it
until they also drop into the grave, and so long as these railways exist, this one-thirteenth
shall possess the power to thus levy an iniquitous impcst upon the entire industry of the
country'. Could anything be more unjust?

Shall lid, 000, 000 people and their descendants sutler a great aii<i growing wrong
rather than that 5,000,000 shall surrender a power to wliich they have no right?

THE FARMER, THE INA'^ESTOR AND THE RAILWAY. 45

The railway is public rather thsm private property, and while the stockholder is
entitled to the usufruct and its limited control, yet such corilrol is a trust for a specific
purpose, such purpose beinj^ the service of the ])ublic, for which the compensation shall
be just and reasoiiiible, but the law never contemplated that one jMirty in interest sliould
alone be in ])(jssession of the kuowledf,'c necessary to a determination of the amount of
capital eiiiiiloyeil and the reasunableiies^s of the charges made, and so long as such knowl-
ed.i,'e is withheld shareholders must expect discontent on tlie part of the public and eflTorts
to secure such control as will ensure justice; and it is this discontent which has been one
of the most potent factors in bringing into existence the "Farmers' Alliance" and kin-
dred organizations, in which millions of farmers — for the first time in history— are united
for a common object.

The endowment of the railway company with the exceptional power to enter upon
end take private property, and the equally exceptional limitation of the stockholders'
liability to the cost of shares held, implies special duties and obligations to the public;
and the i)eople, whose lands have been taken, who furnish the tralTic and provide the
revenue, have a right to a voice in determining the justness of the rates charged.

Another plea is that the cost of transportation is less in the United States than
elsewhere, hence there can be no cause of complaint. If rates are higher in Republican
France or Imperial Germany, where railways exist, primarily, for military purposes, it
Is neither our dut.v to emulate them in such matters nor to copy their costly modes of
railway administration; j-et we may well profit by their example iu providing for strin-
gent control of railways and the rates for carriage.

The farmer, understanding that rates are unjust by reason of an enormous fictitious
capitalization, and that such rates reduce the value of his land and its products, appeals
to legislation for relief, which States have sought to furnish by laws regulating rates and
methods of administration, which are denounced as acts of robbery by the men who have
perpetrated the frauds of which such laws are the resultant.

The men loudest in denunciation of every attempt at control by law are those most
active in tlie manufacture of securities, in operating the construction company, in paying
unearned dividends, in selling or capitalizing cheap lines al many times their cost-
These are the special champions of the widow, the orphan and the savings bank, whom
they have despoiled by the most unblushing frauds. These are the innocent, chivalrous
men, high in the esteem of the street and the exchange, who wish the way left open for
more niokelplating, more Wabashing, more Credit Mobiliers and more stock and bond
watering.

There is abundant evidence that where the iaws have been such as to secure the
jjreatest control— Illinois and Iowa— well located and judieiouslv managed railways are
exceedingly prosperous. Many great lines derive the major part of their traffic from the
granger States, yet the laws, which railway managers and investors denounce as acts of
confiscation, have not prevented the pa.ynient of good dividends. Mr. Poor shows that)
for twenty-five years, the Chicago & Alton dividends have averaged 8.7 per cent.; that
the Chicago, Burlington <fe Quiucy has paid regular cash dividends ranging from 8 to 10
per cent, per annum, and stock dividends aggregating $6,701,990. The Chicago, Rock
Island & Pacific has done about as well in the way of dividends, although its trafflc has
been so largely drawn from Illinois and Iowa. Until certain bond and stock operationsi
the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul paid 7 per cent, dividends, and the Chicago & North-
western has swelled its capital account by the payment of stock dividends, while paying
regular cash dividends of 6 to 8 per cent., and the Illinois Central has, for twenty-sis
years, paid dividends ranging from 4 to 10 percent. peraunum,andaggregating $56,989,847.

Notwithstanding these laws and that nearly or quite all these roads carry an undue
aoaount of water, that crops have failed, and panics have prostrated the industries of the
country, they have prospered, new lines been added from the tolls collected on the old,
the investor received ample returns, and some of the managers enabled, by some occult
process, to amass enormous fortunes, all going to show that the granger laws have not
been oppressive, and that when railways fail to make fair returns it is due to faulty lociv-

46 THE FARMER, THE INVESTOR AND THE RAILWAY.

^

s

of rail-
built in
y'r from
of flctit's
tal and

tolls on
ge built
receding

from ex-
•c tolls.

locoooco— ''-'C<irf05Tt<i^a:i--rcno

CI

CDOt^-^OiO^DCOuni-iOOiC^-^

c ec G<^^^^ <xi C'4^^ oo t-i '^,c^^'^,<^^,c^.

Miles

■way

each

tolls

cap i

from

milea

in p

years

cessi\

COCOCOCCCC^iCiOCDCDCDCOt^OOr^

X

si3=-?£

asOOOCD^-iCOOOCOCCCSOsCOi:^

ciOJcooix.c^cocD-^r-rai'X'trrxci

^ ES.'-csS

OOCJl-CDiO'-'CCl-^OCDLOOQC'^tO

-r/'

ass^»:

t^OSQOCCTtH-«TC-10 1^CTJcriQOC'l(MO

c^-

L0C0"^00C0t0l0'-it-*OO'M»0C0O

c„a'ao=

05-0 COCOOUt>COOI--(Ml^ClCO'^CO

''-!

Tot'l ear
flctilion
and fro
furnishe
■way us
road bu
from.

^o;Gcr-oot-t-iO'**'Oi^(M o-^ i-

05C505050C<luOt^crOOOC:iM'^'r^

€^

cf

1Si2

CC ^1 O a: lO ^ O -^ I- -J^ '-' -^ CI CD

CD

o "^ :;^ o

CI ^t O CC LO X — !•- — ■ O lO lO -* i-O

£ 3 ^-z

■q' -r* :0 05 CO O C-l (M t-- O CO CC O' I-

o|c"

CO-MCOClt-t^WGOar-ODI^OC'C^-^

CO

1^

Bj-fi OW

Of-CCCDC^CDC-lOOiCDCCl'-Cl^

--^

t^ CD 01 C' lO ^ CD »0 O « ^ t^ 00 —

^ CI CO <* :d I' CO O O — CO ic O

>— >

c-fe :i

■ ■

lis?!

^

^>

'"^t

CJt^CCO^-OCl'^'COOOSOOlC'^O

r^

c<j CD a; CO 1:- ^ lo »o :o c-i 00 ^ o rr t--

GO CO C-1 05 lO t-- t^ to 1^ 05 CD 1-- C; -^ t^

uo

^»>

l-^lOCD-^-^CC-fCOCOOlt^OCOCOlC

•^

Ss

iOCDOir^'^i-'COcoi^ot--r^OcD"i

S,-2

Oi^^OCOCKMl^COC^OCOCiOli-H

«— 1

i-Hi-HMLOb-ClCOCCOSOiTfOiMCOCO

OiaSGCI^t-ODCiOSOSOCOOOOOOOaO

f— t

1^-

r"5 Cd
W 0-S

^

«>

C ROM

ioa

o g 8 ^-.2

OHoaS J3 o o a

3 ' <u o

•^ > ^ a o
<^ fi > o u

III

CD be

;5.2

N

V

6:::s

t^i-^t--iO'— lCDa5lCcoo•^^-c^coo

C^CICOCDt^^*— I^COl^CO'-tClO-T-
COlOCli-H.-HCOlO'^COCOi— «'-hC1«— (O

OicC'CiCi'^'^'—iocDiocoi— cii— i-r

O »0 Oi Tj* O CI O lO O 3D CO ■:© r-- lO CI
rt^'M'7-Jf— lO-l'^iO'^COC^'— -O-HC-lO

CO -fOCDCOCDC^iO-— <IOC^OI>-I0i-0
1:^CS^';DCDi— lOCDCO'—'CiOi'^CO"^

(MCD'— 'Tt^oio-^csi— ■^oscocoeoic

t^COOOt^CD— <C^C<JI>C1C^[--t^'-i

lOi— 'lOOiOt-OO-^OCOCOC^CDCD

CDiOCDt^iOOf-^OOCDCCiO'-''^'^
COOOCOOb*"^'— 'COI-'iO^- XO"«t"l"^

i-- LO ^ CO CO I--- T— :rj CO CD ^_— ; "^."^ O

cfci cf cfcic^fcowc^'cicf cNci cicT

I »»

QOOOC-lh-r-CSlCt^CD'CCD— ''^05'— t
»OC01005CD03iOGOO:GCOJCO!:D'— «lO

c:-*t-^:Di-i::2L':ii^cDCi'rtia:io_'-HO_

0"CD cTcfTiO ■^f~'cD'"cD"l^'"-^*'cO CO Oi 1— «
t^OiOt-C-TflOO— <CDCD050COCO
IC lO *^ o: lO IC ^^^^ fO CO O^'^ CD_ C5_t^
05 iO"cD"o''t^"cD io"ci O CO CrfOi O "^ r- (
COO0COl^CO»— 'lOt-CCCiCDCDOCOO
^^^r-Hi-HCMCJClClC^CJC^COCOCO

C-'lCDiOCDi— it^CD*TCOOCOCOOCDl~»

cc'^'oo cToTi-^ CO o"^cf^ ^1-^00 o

iCcOiOCOiOiOtOCOCOCDCDCDCDUOCD

C005C0tMO0iCDf-i^HTt*C<IOl000l^
t^ lO O 1— « CD O -^ I-- I-- •— l- CJ 00 CI C^i
C'lt^iO'— lOSOt— C;05TP'XC0r-<OC0

Tt<iccDt-cooiO'-'cacorj<iocot^co

t^h»l"-I-^t^t-CCCOQO00QCCO00COQO
COOOGOGOQOOOCCOOCOCOCOOOCOOOOO

5 a

s ■■=

2 ><

a

■a
p

a>

■u

a

c

^

u

^

a

■d

o

-i

■r<

Ji

3
O4

.a

THE FARMER, THE INVESTOR AND THE RAILWAY. 47

a
o

to

a

< Z

o

IS

s
a

bo

a

o

W 2 - TJ
© O CJ*a^^

t» aj © £ ■" "C

ci >^©S^2£

ceo XlCMOOt^CO-^iOC^iOWi-H-^co
— O O CO 05 O CO_iO CO 1^ CO CD CC »C :M
(M 71 S'f ^-^r-TcC ^"-^jTrJ*' TT CO CC'^'iO^'^'

CO CO

lO CO

cTco

t^ CO
CO CM

^'o

<:o CD

(Mr*r-C5iot^:DiocD«-<oc

iCCSCDt-iOCOOSCOOCOCO''

r^c-i t-^1-^ i^ t^ -^ (M 00 t^ o ;

CD ^ CO Co' lO'co'c-f QC h-'o -^"p.

•rr*-^'rt<c;c:.-Hc^Oicoioc;i:
" o-f co' oT-m' o" cd' o ^ »o cT -^ c

CDTf*iCCi TCCOCC-rfi-Hi— i-^^c

1^

o o S

o o

lags

M o © a.

i^Ui o

V ©
CM •

-Sua
U5 o p.

~3

§22-

Sc-o

cocoon

lO 00 U?
05 TP t^

ococf

1^ O 'C

lO »o -*

l^ t" OS lO t* CD

05 CD C5 iC 00 Oi
O rH C5 to !>• CD

:d" lo"-^ t^ cd" co'

I^ t^ rff iC O f-"
O »0 lO iC "^ CO

5" O l>" yj^ lO" G-l" o'
5 W CO t-H lO l^ CO

iC CD 1— ( -^

CO c: CO CO

0-1^^ 05 to

:d CD o O
CO O tJ* ^

CO od'o o"

05 CD CO O

MG^cq CO

■-■ iO

r-l O

cz: CO

coo
COCO

oooooooocoooooo
goooooooooooooo

•^00 CC -^i "^^CM ^^O fM O iri r>J CD C-4 CO

r-Tcq^co'Lo"-- '--"^'"oo''^crcoeo crTi^crr

■CO I^ O ^O CO '^ CO CC .-" CD C-I rr O LO C I
C5_(M 00'— <0i"^»0«— (CDiOiOCOfHt-oo

■<;t^ Iff" ^crt^Tj-"-^'";c'"(~'^(j.f05''(^crr-y^

(N d C-l Cq (M G^ (M CO "^ lO iC lO O CD I-

oooo o
CZS o o o o
o o_o o^o

o^o'cTcTo"

CD CO i-H CS 05
T-i CO --^ lO r-l

co"t^o 'O'OI

t~ CO GO CO CO
o OOO --I

oooooooo
oooooooo
o c:; o_o o o o o

'o"o cTo'-o o'o o'c

CN CO O I-- LO 1-1 G^ ■"« :
o_o ^^O^*-^ ^ t- CO c
-jTcd" cTco*" :o C^'io" --"'"':
t^ t-- o cj: n rf i.o o -

O O C'l "fT Lt VO CD CD
1 Ofofof gI C-f CM*crol

o o

CC CO

of cm'

cocot^coco'^i-HOC5ict---ft— Tfn

l^-CSCOiOI^COOCOi— "OCO'M'MiOt-»
C^ UO CO X O i-^CM CD rH CM t^ »0 !>. W Ut!

a^c^'ci r^'^oToTio'c-i"'^ -^x^co'co'cd'
ococccoi-cDcoi-cooocoooooc:©

COCSCOG^IOOSCD^^-J^OlOiOCOr-
t^ »0 O — < CD O -* t^ I- ^ I' 01 CO CN CO

(MI-lO'— CSO'-'OO'^OCO'-'OCO

•*iC-X>h-a0CiO'-"MCCf».0iXl^Q0
I-* 1- I'- 1^ 1- t- X CO 00 GO CO CO OO Xi CO

COCOCO'CO-OOOCOCOX-COCOCOaOGOCO

48 THE FARMER, THE INVESTOR AND THE RAILWAY.

tion, unreasonable rate wars, speculativeor ineonipeteutmanagementor an extraordinary
excess of water in capitalization.

Possibly a flood of lijrht may be thrown on tbis subject by the experience of th«
writer when general freight and passenger agent of a new railway. Imbued with the
idea that the prosperity of the road would be sub.served by encouraging immigration and
fostering business, the writer formulated tarifTs calculated to further such ends. Imagine,
bis astonishment when told by the general manager they would not answer, and to be
informed that the road was not being built to malve money out of its operation, but out of
its construction, and what was re(iuired of the traffic deiiartment wasthe greatest present
revenue possible and to make the j.assenger rates just low enough to take the traffic from
'the stages and the freight rat* s no lower than necessary to drive the ox teams out of the
freight business.

The policy then outlined was pursued until the railway passed through the reor-
jganization thereby made inevitable, and this cheaply-built prairie line, with free right of
way and land grant and subsidy equal to its entire cost, is now capitalized for .$105,000
jper mile.

On most railways the b.isic principle underlying tariff and schedule is "All the
traffic will bear," and it is to hold in check these "Chevaliers of the road" that granger
laws are formulated.

It may be safely assumed that J30, 000 per mile is tlie outside cusl of existing rail-
ways, and the aggregate, at the close of 1S88, on which tolls should be based, was $4,682,-
246,000; but here the question arises: How much of this sum has the railway builder
furnished, and what part has been extorted from the railway user in the form of excessive

tolls?

Available data does not admit of going back of 1874, when 69,27.3 miles were in
operation, the cost of which, at |30,000 per mile, being credited to the builders; and
adopting the net (traffic) earnings as shown by Poor we find that, in 1874, creditiijg each
$30,000 with its proportion of such earnings, pro rata — and adopting the capitalists'
theory that; the water in the capital is en titled to the same revenue as the money part thereof
— the earnings of the water in the capitalization of that year amounted to $91,9.57,829,
being equal to the cost of 3,065 miles of railway. Continuing such computations for
fourteen years and crediting the railway users with the income of so much of the railway
mileage as was, from year to year, built from the tolls collected on the capitalization In
exce.«s of $30,000 per mile, it appears that the users have, within fifteen years, been
mulcted, in the shape of tolls based wholly on water, in the sum of *$2,422,.5S8,4>5, from
which those in possession have constructed 80,7-52 miles of new railway, leaving but 2,901
miles, costing !r87,030,000, to have been built, in the same period, from funds supplied by
those claiming to own all the railways. For details of these computations see Table I.

Should it be claimed that instead of dividing the earnings joro rata between tl\e
re.al and fictitious capital, that the real is entil led to full compensation before anything i,e
assigned to the fictitious, we will, without admitting that the preceding computations
are not correctly based, proceed to first give compensation, at the rate of six per cent, per
aimum, for all the capital actually employed (except that furnished by the users in the
form of tolls in excess of such six per cent.), and again assuming that the capital lobuild
all the roads existing in 1874 had been furnished by the putative owners, and we find the
results as set forth in table II.

Table II shows that from traffic earnings alone the holders of shares and bonds
have received six per cent, per annum for every dollar invested and have, within fifteen
yi'ars, been enabled, by the watery fiction, to extort from railway users the enormous sum
ol" $1,592,280,471 (to which should be added about half as much more from miscellaneous
earnings), with which has been built 5:5,076 miles of railway, for the use of which it is
proposed to forever tax those who have furnished all the money employed in its con-
struction.

Is it possible that no remedy can be found for such evils? In the National Bank
the law has created another form of public trust, but one whose relations to the people
•This Is from trafBc earniugs alone, to wbicli should be added a vast sum from mlsoellanoons sources.

THE FARMER, THE INVESTOR AND THE RAILWAY. 49

are infinitely less intimate and with the services of which the public could dispense
without serious results.

The railway and the bank each perform functions that the State might; yet the
bank alone is held to the most rigid discharge of its duties, a nia.\imum fixed for its rates
of toll, the amount it shall loan any one party, and the kind of security determined as
well as the amount of its reserve fund, its books and assets at all times subject to inspec-
tion without notice, no share issued until paid for in full, the payment of unearned divi-
dends made a penal offense and breaches of trust punislied in an exemplary manner.

Can there be any sufficient reason why the railway corporation, with infinitely
greater power and privileges, performing functions a thousand times more important, and
directly afltecting a hundred persons for one affected by bank administration, should not
be subjected to control quite .is stringent and quite as far-reaching?

Shares and bonds being the basis of tolls, sliould a railway company be permitted
to issue share or bond until its par value in actual money has been covered into the cor-
porate treasury?

Should the basis of tolls be laid until it lias been shown that a proposed line is nec-
essary to public convenience and will make fair returns on its cost?

Should a railway companj' be permitted to collect tolls until it has shown theexact
cost of the instrument of transportation?

Should it not be a penal offense for a railway official to pay an unearned dividend?

Should not railway accounts, stock and bond ledgers and assets be subjected to like
inspection as those of national banks?

Would not rate wars cease were railways, once having reduced rates, debarred from
ever again advancing them without governmental permission?

Should not railway companies be taxed on their capitalization as shown in issues
of bonds and shares?

Should not railways be appraised at present cash value, and earnings from all
sources, be limited to what would afford a given maximum return on such appraisal?

Or should the nation assume the ownership and operate the railways through a
non-partisan commission, as the Province of Victoria, Australia, has shown to be both
practical and economical?

There is no longer any question as to the power of the nation to control these great
arteries of trade, nor is there outside a limited circle, any question as to the necessity of
such control, and it but remains for the lawgivers to formulate such statutes as will pro-
tect user and investor, both of whom are at the mercy of a small body of men who can
and do make andmar the fortunesof individuals, cities and States withoutlet or hindrance

^SHOULD THE NATION OWN THE RAILW.-VY?

When the paper published in the February Arena, entitled "The Farmer, the In-
vestor and the Railway," was written the writer was not ready to accept national owner-
ship as a solution of the railway problem, but the occurrences attending the flurries of
last Autumn in the money markets, when half a dozen men, in order to obtain control of
certain railways, entered into a conspiracy that came near wrecking the entire industrial
and commercial interests of the country, having shed a lurid light upon the enormous
and baleful power which the corporate control of the railways places in the hands of
what Theodore Roosevelt aptly termed '-the dangerous wealthy classes," has had the
effect of converting to the advocacy of national ownership, not only the writer, but vast
numbers of conservative people of the Central, Western and Southern States, to whom
•First published in the Arena July and August, 1891.

50 SHOULD THE NATION OWN THE RAILWAYS?

the question now assumes this form: "Wliich is lo be prefeired, a musier in the shape of
a political party that it is possible to dislodge by the use of the Ijallot or «ue in the shape
of ten or twenty Goulds, Vanderbills, Huntingtons, Rockefellers, Sages, Dillons and
Brices who never die and whom it will be impossible to dislodge by the use of theballot?"
The particular Gould or Vanderbilt may die, as did that Vanderliilt to whom is aserllied
the aphorism "The public be damned," but the spirit aud power of the Goulds and Van-
ierhilts never die.

OBJECTIONS TO NATIONAL OWNERSHIP.

The objections to national ownership are many; that most frequently advancedand
having the most force being the possibilty that, by reason of its control of a vastly in-
creased number of civil servants, the party in possession of the federal administration at
the time such ownership was assumed would be able to perpetuate its power indefinitely.
As there are more than 700,000 people employed by the railways this objection would s-i em
to be well taken, and it indicates serious and far-reaching results, un/ess some way can he
devised to neutralize the political power of such a vast addition to the oflicial army.

In the military service we have a body of men that exerts little or no potitical
power, as the moment a citizen enters the army he divests himself of political functions,
and it is not hazardous to say that 700,000 capable and efRcient men can lie found who. for
the sake of employment to be continued so long as they are capable and well-behaved, will
forego the right to take part in political aflEairs. If a suflficient numlier of such men can
be found this objection would, by proper legislation, be divested of all its force. At all
events, no trouble from such a source has been experienced since Australian railways
were placed under control of non-partisan commissions, such commissions having had
charge of the Victorian railways since February, 1884, or a little more than one term,
they having been appointed for seven years, instead of for life, as stated by Mr. W. M.
Acworth in his argument against government control in the March Forum.

The second objection is that there would be a constant political pressure to msike
places for the strikers of the party in power, thus adding a vast number of useless men to
the force and rendering it progressively more ditBeult to effect a change in the political
complexion of the administration.

That this objection has much less force than is claimed is clear from the conduct of
the Postal Department, which is unquestionably a political adjunct to the administration;
yet but few useless men are employed, while its conduct of the mail service is a model of
elBciency after which the corporate managed railways might well pattern. Moreover, if
the railways are put under non-partisan control this objection will lose nearly if not quite
all its force.

A third objection is that the service would be less efficient and cost more than with
continued corporate ownership.

This appears to be bare assertion, as from the very nature of the case there can be
no data outside that furnished by the government-owned railways of British clo-
onles, and such data negatives these assertions and the advocates of national ownership
arejustified in asserting that such ownership would materially lessen the cost. Any
expert can readily point out many ways in which the enormous costs of corporate man-
agement would be lessened. With those familiar with presentmethods andnotinterested
in their perpetuation, this objection has no force whatever.

The fourth objection is that with constant political pressure unnecessary linos
would be built for political ends.

This is al.so bare assertion, although it is not impossible that such results would fol-
low; yet such has not been the case in the British colonies, where the governments have
had control of construction. On the other hand, it is notorious that under corporat"
ownership, aud solely to reap the profits to be made out of construction, the L'uiled Sl:;l( >
have been burthened with u.seless parallel roads and such corporations as tlie Santa F.
have paralled their own lines for such profits. It is quite safe to say th:it when the nati< n
owns the railways there will be no uickelplating, nor will such an uniuHcssary exiieni'ii"
ture be made as was involved in the construction of the West Shore; nor will the fiat o(

SHOULD THE NATION OWN THE RAILWAYS? 51

GmiUl niul the S;inta Fe be repeated of building 240 miles side by side for construction
profits, uiucli of which is located in the arid portion of Kansas, where there is never
likely to ho traflic for even one railway. Mucli of the Republic is covered with closely
parallel lines which would never have been built under national ownership, and this pro-
cess will (!ontinue as long as the manipulators can make vast sums out of construction.

A nrth olijeetion is that with the amount of red-tape that will be in use it will pe
impossible to secure the building of needed lines.

While such objection is inconsistent with the fourth, it may have some force but as
the greater part of the country is already provided with all the railways that will be
needed for a generation it is not a very serious objection, even if it is as difficult as asserted
to procure the building of new lines. Il is not probable, however, that the government;
Would refuse to build any line that would clearly subserve public convenience ; the con-
duct of the postal service negativing such a supposition, and for party purposes the ad-
ministration would certainly favor the construction of such lines as were clearly needed
anil it is high time that only such should be built, and what instrumentality so fit to de-
termine this as a non-partisan commission acting as the agent of the whole people? The
sixth objection is that lines built by the government would cost much more than if built
by corporations.

Possibly this would be true, but they would be much better built and cost far less
for maintenance and "betterments" and would represent no more than actual cost, and
such lines as the Kansas Midland, costing but $10,200 per mile, would not, as now, be cap-
italized at 153,024 per mile, nor would the president of the Union Pacifie (as does Sidney
Dillon in the North American Review for April) say that "A citizen, simply as a citizeni
commits an impertinence when he questions the right of a corporation to capitalize its
properties at any sum whatever," as then there would be no Sidney Dillons who would
be presidents of corporations pretending to own railways built wholly from government
moneys and lauds, and who have never invested a dollar in the construction of a property
which they have now capitalized at the modest sum of |106,000 per mile. After such an
achievement iu making much out of nothing, it is no wonder that Mr. Dillon is a multi-
millionaire and thinks it an impertinence when a citizeu asks how he has discharged his
trust iu relation to a railway built wholly with public funds, no part of which Mr. Dillon
and his as.sociates seem in haste to pay back ; their indebtedness to ibe government, with
many years of unpaid interest, amounting to more than $50,000,000, which is morp than
the ca.sh cost Of the railway upon which these men have been so sharp as to induce the
government, after furuishiug all the money expended in its construction, to accept a
second mortgage, and now asks the same accommodating government to reduce the rate
of interest— which they make no pretense of paying — to a nominal figure, and to wait
another hundred years for both principal and interest. To make sure that the govern-
ment's second mortgage shall be no more valuable than second mortgages usually are,
and to make it more comfortable for the manipulators, Messrs. Gould and Dillon now
propose to put a blanket first mortgage of .$250,000,000 on this property built wholly from
funds derived from the sale of goverumeut lands and hoods, and to pay the interest on
which bonds the people are yearly taxed, although Mr. Dillon and his associates con-
tracted to pay such interest. In his conception of the relations of the railway corpora"
tiiius to the public Mr. Dillon is clearly not in accord with the higher tribunals which
hold, iu substance, that railways are public rather than private property and that the
share-holders are entitled to but a reasonable compensation for the capital actually ex-
pended in construction and a limited control of the property and in this connection it
may be well to quote briefly from decisions of the United States Supreme Court, which,
in the case of the Wabash llailway vs. Illinois, uses this lauguage: "The highways in
the state are ihe highways of the state. The highways are not of private but
of public institution and regulation. In modern times, it is true, government is
iu the habit, in some countries, of letting out the construction of important
highways, requiring a large expenditure of capital, to agents generally corporate
bodies created for the purpose, and giving them the right of taxing those who

52 SHOULD THE NATION OWN THE EAILWAYS ?

travel or transport goods thereon as a means of obtaining compensation for their
outlay; but a superintending power over the highways and the charges imposed upon the
public for their use always remains in the government." Again in Olcott vs. the Super-
visors it is held that: "Whether the use of a railway is a public or private one depends)"
no measure upon the question who constructed it or who owns it. It has never been con-
sidered of auy importance that the road was built by the agency of a private corporation.
No matter who is the agent the function performed is that of the State."

Mr. Justice Bradley says: "When a railroad is chartered it is for the purpose of
performing a duty which belongs to the State itself. * * * * It is the duty
and prei'ogative of the State to provide means of intercommunication between one part of
its territory and another."

If, as appears, such is the duty of the State (nation) why should not the StateVesume
the discharge of this duty when the corporate agents to which it has delegated it are
found to be using the delegated power for the purpose of oppressing and plundering a
public which it is the duty of the government to protect?

The abilities of the man who cannot become a multi-millionaire with the free use,
for 25 years, of $33,000,000 of government funds must be of a very low order and it is no
wonder, that after having for so many years had the use of such a sum without pajTueut
of interest Mr. Dillon and his associates are very wealthy and like others who are re-
taining what does not belong to them think it an impertinence when the owner enquires
what use they are making of property to which they have no right. Had the nation
built the Union Pacific there would have been no "Credit-Mobilier" and its unsavory
scandal and it is safe to say that the road would not now be made to represent an expendi-
ture of $106,000 per mile and that Mr. Dillon and some others would not have so much
money as to warrant them in putting on such insufferable airs. When it is remembered
what use Oaks Ames and the Union Pacific crew made of issues of stock it is not at all
surprising that the president of the Union Pacific should think it an impertinence for a
citizen to question the amount of capitalization or the use to which a part of such issues
have been put some of which are within the knowledge of the writer so far as relates to
issues of that part of the Union Pacific lying in Kansas and built by Samuel Hallett who
told the writer that he gave a member of the then federal cabinet several thousand
shares of the capital stock of the "Union Pacific Railway Eastern Division" — now the
Kansas division of the Union Pacific— to secure the acceptance of sections of the road which
were not built in accordance with the requirements of the act of Congress which provided
that a given amount of government bonds per mile should be delivei'ed to the railway
company when certain offlcials should accept the road and it was a quarrel with the chief
engineer of the road in relation to a letter written by such engineer to President Lincoln,
Informing him of the defective construction of this road, that caused Samuel Hallett to be
shot down in the streets of Wyandotte, Kansas by engineer Talcott. It is within the
the knowledge of the writer that the member of the cabinet to whom Mr. Hallett said he
gave several thousand shares of stock held an amount of Union Pacific shares
years afterwards and that many years after he left the cabinet he continued to draw a
large salary from the Union Piicific company. Mr. Hallett also told the writer the argu-
ments applied to Congressmen to induce them to change the government lien from a, first to
a second nioitgag.,' of the Pacific Railway lines aud what was his contribution in dollars
to the fund used to enable congressmen to see the force of the arguments used.

When issues of railway shares are used for corrupt purposes it is certainly an im-
pertinence for a citizen to make enquiries or offer any remarks in relation thereto.

The seventh objection to state owned railways is that they are incapable of progres-
sive improvement, as are corporate owned ones, and will not keep pace with the progress
of the nation in other respects, and in his Forum article Mr. Acworth lays great stress
upon this phase of the question and argues that as a result the service will be far less sat-
isfactory than now.

There may be force in this objection, but the evidence points to the opposite con-
clusion. When the nation owns the railways trains will run into union depots, the
equipment will become uniform and of the best character, and so sufficient that the traffic

SHOULD THE NATION OWN THE RAILWAYS? 5H

of no part of the country would have to wait while the worthless locomotives of some
bankrupt corporatiDii were liciiii;- patolied up, uor would there be the present difficulties
in obtaiiiiiis^ freight cars, growing out of the poverty of corporations which have been
plundered by the manipulators, nor would iniprovciiient be hindered by the diverse ideas
of the managers of various lines in relation to the adoption of devices intended to render
life more secure, or to add to the public convenience. That such is one of the evils of cor-
porate management is demonstrated daily and is shown by the following from the Rail-
way JRcvieiv of March 7th, 1891 : "It is stal-ed that a bill will be introduced in the Illinois
legislature, at the suggestion of the railroad and warehouse commissioners, governing the
placing of interlocking plants at railway grade crossings. It sometimes happens that one
of the comi)anies concerned is anxious to put in such a plant and the other objects. At
present there is no law to govern the matter and the enterprising company is forced to
abide the time of the other." Instead of national ownership being a hindri.nce to im-
provement and enterprise the results in Australia prove the contrary, as in Victoria the
government railways are already provided with interlocking plants at all grade crossings
and one line does not have to wait the motion of another, but all are governed by an ac.
tive and enlightened policy which adopts all beneficial improvements, ajipliances or
modes of administration that will add either to the public safety, comfort or convenience.
It is safe to say that had the nation been operating the railways there would have been
no Fourth avenue tunnel horror and C'hauncy Depew and associates would not now be
under indictment, as the government would not have continued the use of the death
■dealing stove on half the railways in the country in order to save money for the share-
holders.

Existing evidence all negatives Mr. Acworth's postulate "That state railway sys-
tems are incapable of vigorous life."

An objection to national ownership which the writer has not seen advanced is
that states, counties, cities, townships and school-districts would loose some $27,000,000 of
revenue derived from taxes upon railways.

While this would be a serious loss to some communities there would be compensat-
ing advantages for the public as the cost of transportation would be lessened in like
measure.

Many believe stringent laws enforced by commissions having judicial powers will
serve the desired end and the writer was long hopeful of the efflcacy of regulation by
state and national commissions but close observation of their endeavors and of the con-
stant efforts — too often successful— of the corporations to place their tools on such com-
missions and to evade all laws and regulations have convinced him that such control is
and must continue to be inefTective and that the only hope of just and impartial treat-
ment for railway users is to exercise the "right of eminent domain", condemn the rail-
ways and pay their owners what it would cost to duplicate them and in this connection
it may be well to state what valuations some of the corporations place upon their proper-
ties.

Some years since the "Santa Fe" filed in the counties on its line a statement show-
ing that at the then price of labor and materials — rails were then double the present price
— that the road could he duplicated for $9,685 per mile and the materials being badly
worn the actual cash value of the road did not exceed $7,725 per mile.

In 1885 the superintendent of the St. Louis & Iron Mountain Railway, before the
Arkansas State Board of Assessors, swore that he could duplicate such railway for $11,000
per mile and yet Mr. Gould has managed to float its securities notwithstanding a capital-
ization of Ave times that amount.

THE ADVANTAGE OF NATIONAL OWNERSHIP.

First would be the stability and practical uniformity of rates now impossible, as
they are subject to change byhundreds of officials, and are often made for the purpose of
enriching such officials. State and federal laws have had the eflect of nniking discrimi-
nations less public and less numerous, but it is doulitful if they are less eflective in en-

64 SHOULD THE NATION OWN THE RAILWAYS?

riching officials and their partners although it may be necessary to be more careful in
covering up tracks. That they are continued is within the cognizance of every well in.
formed shipper and are made clear by such cases as that of Counselmau and Peasley now
before the United States Supreme Court. Conselman and Peasley — one a large shipper
and the other a prominent railway official — refused to testify before a United States grand
Jury upon the plea that to do so might criminate themselves; the federal law making it a
criminal offense to make or benertt by discriminating rates. Oounselman had been given
rates on corn some five cents less per 100 pounds than others from Kansas and Nebraska
points to Chicago.

The outrageous character of this discrimination will appear when we reflect that
five cents per 100 pounds is an enormous profit on corn that the grower has sold at from
18 to 20 cents per 100 pounds and that such a margin would tend to drive every one but
the railway officials and their secret partners out of the trade, as has practically been the
case on many western roads. Doubtless such rates are sometimes made in order to take
the commodity overa certain line, and there is no divide with the officials; but the eflect
upon the com])etitors of the favored shipper and the public is none the less injurious and
such practices would not obtain under uatioual ownership, when railway users would be
treated with honesty and impartiality which the experience of half a century shows to
be impossible with corporate ownership.

Referring to the rate question in their last report the Interstate Commerce Com-
mission says: "If we go no farther than the railroad managers themselves for informa-
tion, we shall not find that it is claimed that railroad service, as a whole, is conducted
without unjust discrimination."

" If rates are secretly out, or if rebates are given to large shippers, the fact of itself
shows the rates which are charged to the general public are unreasonable, for they are
necessarily made higher than they ought to be in order to provide for the cut or to pay
the rebate."

' ' If the carrier habitually carries a great number of people free, its regular rates are
made the higher to cover the cost; ifheavy commissions are paid forobtaiuingbusiness, the
rates are made the higher that the net revenues may not suffer in consequenee ; if scalpers
are directly or Indirectly supported by the railroad companies, the general public refunds
to the companies what the support costs."

The commission quote a Chicago railway manager as saying : " Rates are absolutely
demoralized and neither shippers, passengers, railways, or the public in general' make any"
thing by this state of affairs. Take passenger rates for instance ; they are very low ; but
who benefits by the reduction? No one but the scalpers. * * * * In freight matters
the case is just the same. Certain shippers are alloweed heavy rebates, while others are
made to pay full rates. * * * * The management is dishonest on all sides, and there
is not a road in the country that can be accused of living up to the interstate law. Of
course when some poor devil comes along and wants a pass to save him from starvation
he has several clauses of the interstate act read to him; but when a rich shipper wants a
pass, why he gets it at once."

From years of iueflectual efforts, on the part of state and national legislatures and
commissions, to regulate the rate business it would appear that the onlj' remedy is na-
tional ownership, which would place the rate making power in one body, with no induce,
ment to act otherwise than fairly and impartially, and this would simplify the whole
business and relegate an army of traffic managers, general freight agents, soliciting
agents, brokers, scalpers, and hordes of traffic association officials to more useful callings
while relieving the honest user of the railway of intolerable burthens.

Under corporate control, railways and their officials have taken possession of the
majority of the mines which furnish the fuel so necessary to domestic and industrial life,
and there are but few coal fields where they do not fix the price at which so essential an
article shall be sold, and the whole nation is thus forced to pay undue tribute.

Controlling rates and the distribution of cars, railway ofBcials have driven nearly
all the mine owners to the wall who have not railways or railway officials for partners.
Per instance; in Eastern Kansas, on the line of the "St. Louis & San Francisco Railway

SHOULD THE NATION OWN THE RAILWAYS? 55

Company," were two cnal companies, whose plants were of about equal capacity, and sev-
eral individual sbippers. The railway company and its officials became iuteres-ted in one
of the coal companies and such company was. by the rebate and other processes, given
rates which averaged but forty per cent, of the rates charged other shippers the result bo-
lug that all tilt* other shippers were driven out of the business, a part of them being hope-
lessly ruined before giving up the struggle. In addition to gross discriminations in rates
this railway eompauy practiced worse discriminations in the distribution of cars; for in-
stance during one period of 564 days, as was proven in court, they delivered to the Pitts-
burg Coal Compauy 2371 empty cars to be loaded with coal although such company had
sale for and a capacity to produce and load, during the same period, more than 10,000
cars. During tlie same period the railway company delivered to the 'Rogers Coal Com-
pany" in which the railway company and C. W. Rogers, its vice president and general
manager, were interested, no less than 15,483 coal cars while 456 were delivered to indi-
vidual shippers. lu other words; the coal company owned, in large part, by the railway
and its otlicials, was given 82 per cent, of all the facilities to get coal to market, although
the other shippers had much greater combined capacity than had the Rogers Coal Com-
pany.

During the lust four months of the period named, aud when the Pittsburg Coal
Company had the plant, force and capacity to load thirty cars per day, they received an
average of one and a fourth cars per day, resulting, as was intended, in the utter ruin of
a prosperous business aud the involuntary sale of the property, while the railway coal
company, the railway officials, aud the accommodating friends who operated the Rogers
Coal Compauy made vast sums of money, aud when all other shippers had thus been
driven otf the line the price of coal was advanced to the consumer.

pn another railway, traversing the same coal field, the railway or its officials be-
came interested in the Keith it Perry Coal Compauy— the largest coal company doing
business on the line — and here the plan seems to have been, in addition to the mauipula-
tion of rates, to starve other mine operators out, and force them to sell their coal to the
Keith & Perry compauy, by failing to furnish the needed cars to those who did not sell
their coal to the Keith & Perry company at a very low price.

When the Keith & Perry company had a great demand for coal, such parties as sold
the product of their mines to that compauy were furnished with cars, but for the other
operators cars were not to be had, such cars as were brought to the field being assigned to
such parties as were loading to the Keith & Perry compauy, the plea being that such
compauy furnished the coal consumed by the locomotives of the railway.

One operator, after being for years forced in this way to sell his product to the Keith
& Perry company or see his several plants stand idle, has, iu recent months, been obliged
to build some seven miles of railway in order to reach four different roads and thus have
a fighting chance for cars, although all these railways are provided with coal mines
owued by the corporations or their officials.

In Arkansas Jay Gould, or his railway company, own coal mines and the coal is
transported to the neighboring town at low rates aud there is an ample supply of cars
for such mines, but the owners of an adjoining mine are forced to haul their coal, some
eighteen miles, to the same town in wagons, as the rates charged them over Mr. Gould's
railway are so high as to absorb the value of the coal at destination.

Not only are individuals thus oppressed, but for reasons which only the iuitiated
can fathom there are seemingly purposeless discrimination against localities, as shown in
the following extract from the Coat Trade Journal of March 25th, 1891:

"Capt, Thomas H. Bates, before the railroad committee of the Colorado Senate
Bald: The Grand River Coal and Coke Company mine their coal in Garfield County,
about fifty miles west of Leadville, and all they sell in Denver, Colorado Springs and
Pueblo, has to be hauled through Leadville. At Leadville the individual consumer has
to pay seven dollars per ton for this coal while in Denver, with an additional haul of
150 miles, the coal from the same mines is delivered to the individual cousuujer for
Jo. 50 per ton. The Colorado Coal & Iron Company produce all the anthracite coal sold
iu Colorado. It is mined at Crested Butte, which is 150 miles nearer Leadville than

50 SHOULD THE ?f ATION OWN THE RAILWAYS?

Denver yet this coal is sold in Leadville for 19.00 to the individual consumer while tlie
same coal is hauled 150 miles farther and sold to the individual consumer for an
advance of 25 cents per ton over the Leadville price and is sold iu Denver for $7.10 per
ton in carload lots."

With the government operating the railways, discriminations would cease, as would
individual and local oppression; and we may be sure that an instant and absolute divorce
would be decreed between railways and their officials on one side and commercial enterprises
of every name and kind on the other.

There are but three countries of any importance where the railways are operated by
corporations permitted to fix rates as in all others the government is the ultimate rate
making power: these are Great Britain, Canada, and tlie United States, and while the Brit-
ish government exercises a more eflWctive control than we do there are many and oppres-
sive discriminations, and complaints loud and frequent and English farmers find it
nec(«sary to unite for the purpose of securing protection from corporate oppression as is
shown by the following from the Liverpool Courier of January 29th, 1891.

"LANCASHIRE FARMERS AND RAILWAY RATES.

"After the counsel given them yesterday by Mr. A. B. Forwood of Orma-
kirk, it may be expected that the Liverpool District Farmers' Club will be
on the watch for tangible evidence of their grievances against the railway com-
panies. ***** Under certain circumstances competition operates to
the advantage of the public, and rival carriers are constrained to convey goods from place
to place at moderate charges, but where a company is not held in check the tendency is
for rates to advance. In many cases, too, special interests of the companies are promoted
at the expense of localities, and even individuals are subjected to the wrong of preli ren-
tial charges. (There are no complaints in Britain that tliese discriminations are praciised
for the purpose of enriching the officials.) Hence the necessity for the Railway Commis-
sion to regulate the magnates of the iron road, who, when left without restraint pay little
regard to interests other tlian those of their share-holders."

Although Mr. Acworth fails to mention this phase of English railway administra-
tion it would appear that the evils of discrimination are common under corporate manage"
men tin Great Britain and thatthey are inherent to and inseparable from such management,
and that the questions of rates, discriminations and free tralticin fuel can be satisfactorily
adjusted only by national ownership and if for no other reasons such ownership is greatly
to be desired.

The failure to furnish equipment to do the business of the tributary country
promptly is one of the greater evils of corporate administration, enabling officials to prac.
tice most injurious and oppressive forms of discrimination and is one that neither federal
or state commission pays any attention to. With national ownership a sufficiency of
ears would be provided. On many roads the funds that should have been devoted to
furnishing the needed equipment, and which the corporations contracted to provide
when they accepted their charters, have been divided as construction prolils. or, as in the
case of the Santa Fe, Union Pacific and many others, diverted to the payment of un-
earned dividends while the public sufTers from this failure to comply with charter obli-
gations; yet, Mr. Dillon informs us that the citizen commits an impertinence when he
enquires why contract obligations, which arc the express consideration for the excep-
tional powers granted, are not performed.

Another great advantage which would result from national ownership would be
such an adjustment of rates that traffic would take the short route and not, as under
corporate management, be sent around by way of Robin Hood's barn, when it might
reach destination by a route but two-thirds as long, and thus saving the unnecessary tax
to which the industries of the country are subjected. That traffic can be sent by these
round-about routes at the same or less rates than is charged by the shorter ones is prima
facie evidence that rates are too high. If it costs a given sum to transport a specifio
amount of merchandise a thousand miles, it is clear that it will cost a greater sum to
transport it fifteen hundred; and yet traffic is daily diverted from the thousand mile route
to the fifteen hundred one and carried at the same or lower rates than is charged by the

SHOULD THE NATION OWN THE RAILWAYS? 57

shorter line. It is evident that if the long route can afford to do the business for the -rates
charged that the rates charged by the shorter are excessive in a high degree.

Under government management traffic would take the direct route, as mail matter
now doe.s, and the industries of the country be relieved of the enormous tax imposed by
needless hauls. Only those .somewhat familiar with the extent of the diversions from
direct routes can form any conception of the aggregate saving that would be effected by
such change as would result from national ownership, and which may safely be estimated
as equal to 2} per cent, of tlie entire cost of the railway service, or $2.5,000,000 per annum.

With the government operating the railways there would be a great reduction in
the number of men emploj-ed in towns entered by more than one line. For instance take
a town where there are three or more railways and we find three (or more) full fledged
staffs, three (or more) expensive up-town freight and ticket ofBees, three (or more) separ-
ate sets of all kinds of otfleials and employes, and three (or more) separate depots and
yards to be maintained.

Under government control these staffs — except in very large cities — would be re-
duced to one, and all trains would ruu into one centrally located depot; freight aud pas-
sengers be transferred without present cost, annoyance and friction, and public conveni-
ence and comfort subserved and added to in manner and degree almost inconceivable.

Economies which would be effected by such stafi reductions would more than offset
any additions to the force likely to be made at the instance of politicians, thus eliminat-
ing that objection, and such saving may be safely estimated at 120,000,000 per annum.

With the nation owning the railways the great number of expensive attorneys now
employed, with all the attendant corruption of the fountains of Justice, can be dispensed
with and there will be no corporations to take from the bench the best legal minds by
offering three or four times the federal salary; nor will there be occasion for a Justice of
the Supreme Court of Kansas to render a decision that acorporation chartered by Kansas
for the sole purpose of building a railway in that State has the right and power, under
such charter, to guarantee the bonds of corporations building railways in Old or New
Mexico, and shortly after writing such decision be carted all over the seaboard States in
one of the luxurious private cars of such corporation. Under national ownership such
judges would pay their traveling expenses in the ordinary manner and not half as many
judges would travel on passes. There are many judges whose decisions any number of
passes would not affect, but if passes are not to have any effect upon legislation and liti-
gation why are congressmen, legislators, judges and other court officials singled out for
this kind of martyrdom? If the men who attain these positions remained private citi-
zens would passes be thrust upon them?

Although the rei)i)rts of the Victorian Commissioners show in detail all the ex.
penditures of railway administration, y et not one dollar is set down for attorneys' salaries
or for legal expenses, and it is presumed that the ordinary law officers of the government
attend to the little legal business arising, and yet, judging from reports made by Kansas
roads, tlie expenditures of the corporate owned railways of the United States for attorneys
and other legal expenses are at least two per cent, of the entire cost of operating the roads
and yearly aggregate some $14,000,000, all of which is taken directly from railway users,
and is a direct tax, which would be saved under national ownership, as United States dis-
trict attorneys could attend to such legal business as might arise. This expeniture is
incurred in endless controversies between the corporations; in wrecking railways; in
plundering the shareholders; in contending against state and federal regulations; in
manipulating elections and legislation, aud in wearing out such citizens as seek legal re-
dress for some of the manj' outrageous acts of oppression practiced by the corporations.
Once the government was in control, these lawyers would be relegated to some employ,
nient where they would do less harm, even if not engaged in a more honorable vocation
than that of trying to defeat justice by the use of such questionable means as the control
of the vast revenues of the corporations placed in their hands.

Is it possible that raihvaj- companies can legitimatelj' use anything like |14,000.000
yearly in protecting their rights in the courts?

The Dresident of the Union Pacific tells us that : "The courts are open to redress

58 SHOULD THE NATION OWN THE RAILWAYS?

all real grievances of the citizens." There is probably no man in the United States bet-
ter aware than is Sidney Dillon that no citizen, unless he has as much wealtli as the
president of the Uuiun Piiciflc, can successfully contest a case of any importance in the
courts with one of these corporations which make a business, as a warning to other possi-
ble plaintiflfs, of wearing out the unfortunate plaintifT with the laws costly delays; and
failing in this do not hesitate to spirit away the plaintiff's witnesses, and to pack and
buy juries — retaining a special class of attornej's for this work — the command of great
corporate revenues enabling them to accomplish theireuds, and to utterly ruin nearly
every man having the hardihood to seek Mr. Dillon's lauded legal redress, and when
they have accomplished such nefarious object the entire cost is charged 1 ack to the public
and collected in the form of tolls upon trafHc. Laws are utterly powerless to restrain the
corporations, and Mr. Dillon tells us how easy it is for them to evade by pleading compli-
ance, when there has been no compliance, and then having the expert servants of the cor-
poration Swear there has been.

With the governient operating the railways every citizen riding would pay fare
adding immensely to the revenues. Few have any conception of the proportion who
travel free, and half a century's experience renders it doubtful if the pass evil— so much
greater than ever was the franking privileges — can be eliminated otherwise than by na-
tional ownership. From the experience of the writer as an auditor of railway accounts,
and as an executive officer issuing passes, he is able to say that fully ten per cent. tru\el
free, the result being that the great mass of railway users are yearly mulcted some $30-
000,000 for the benefit of the favored minority, hence it is evident that if all were required
to pay for railway services, as they are for mail services, the rates might be reduced ten
per cent, or more, and the corporate revenues be no less, and the operating expenses no
more. In no other country — unless it be under the same system in Canada — are uine-
teuths of the people taxed to pay the traveling expenses of the other tenth. By what
right do the corporations tax the public that members of congress, legislators, judges and
other court officials and their families may ride free? Wliy is it that when a legislature
is in session that passes are as plentiful as leaves in the forest in autumn ?

The writer, as an executive officer of a railway company having authority to issue
passes, has, during a session of the legislature, signed vast numbers of blank passes at the
request of the legislative agents of such company and under instructions of the president
of the corporation to furnish such lobby agents with all the passes they should ask for.

No reports of passes issueil are made either to state or federal governments, or to con-
fiding share-holders, and should such reports be asked for, by state or nation, in order to
measure the extent of this evil, the Sidney Dillons would rush into print and tell us it
was a piece of impertinence for any citizen (or the public ) to enquire into the extent of
or the manner in which the corporation dispensed tlieir favors. Tlie only way to kill this
monster is to put the instruments of transportation under such control as only national
ownership can give. Laws and agreements between the corporations have been proven,
time and again, wholly ineffctive even to lessen this great and corrupting evil.

In every conceivable way are the net revenues of the corporations depleted and
needless burthens imposed upon the public, but one of the worst is the system of paying
commissions for the diversion of traffic to particular lines, often the least direct. The
more common practice is to pay such commissions to agents of connecting lines where it
is possible to send the traffic over any one of two or more routes, and the one which may,
by the payment of such commission secure the carrying of the passenger (or merchan-
dise) may be the least desirable, and the one which would never liave been taken but for
the prevarications of an agent, bribed by a commission to make false representations as to
the desirableness of the route he selects for the confiding passenger.

This is but one of many phases of the commission evil, another being that these
Bums are ultimately paid, not by the corporations, but by the users of the Riil ways, and but
for the payment of such commissions tlie rates might lie reduced in like amounts. Aside
from commissions paid for diverting passenger traffic greatsums are paid for "influencing"
and "routing" freight traffic, and these sums, while paid to outsiders, or so-called brok-
ers, are frequently divided with railway officials. When the writer was in charge of the

SHOULD THE NATION OWN THE RAILWAYS? 59

transportation Accounts of a railway running east frcm Chicago, it was a part of bis duties
to certify to the correctness of the vouchers on wliich commission puymcnts were made,
and he became aware of the fact that one Cliicago brokerage firm was being paid a com-
mission of from tliree to five cents per liiaulred pounds on nearly all the flour, grain,
packing house, anddistillery products being shipped out of Chicago over this railway, no
matter where such shipmeut might originate, uiariy of them, in fact, originating on and
far west of the Mississippi river, and when he objected to certifying to shipments with
which it was clear that ihf Chicago parties could have had nothing to do, he was told by
the manager that his duties ended when he had ascertained and certified that such ship-
ments had been made from Chicago station. From investigatious instituted by the
writer, he soon learned that some one connected with the management was deeply inter-
ested in the payment of the largest sums possible as commission.

The corporations have ineirectually wrestled with the commission evil, and any
number of agreements have been entered into to do away with it; but it is so thoroughly
entrenched, and so many of their otficials have an interest in its perpetuation, that they are
utterly powerless in the presence of a system which imposes great and needless burthens
upon their patrons, but which will die the day the government takes possession of the
railways, as then there will be no corporations ready to pay for the diversion of trafBc.
National ownership alone can dispose of an administrative evil that, from such data as is
obtainable, appears to cost the public from $20,000,000 to $25,000,000 per annum.

Mr. Meany, in his Sun article, sumiuarizes six causes for the diminution of rail^'ay
dividends and remarks: "It is unnecessary to dwell at any great length upon the first
five mentioned reasons, but too much could not be said on the sixth. It is now nearly
seven years since James McHeury of London (and New YorS, Pennsylvania and Ohio
Rjulway litigation fame) openly charged railway managers, in an interview published
in the Sun, with criminal collusion in the matter of securing extraordinany privileges
and unapproachable contracts with their several corporations for favored fast freight
lines, expn ss routes, bridge conapauies, etc., etc., in all the benefits of which such mana-
gers shared to a very great extent. On that occassiou Mr. McHenry was promptly cried
down. Would he be cried down to-day ? "

As a rule American railways pay the highest salaries in the world for those en-
gaged in directing business operations, but such salaries are not paid because trans-ceud-
ant talents are necessaiy to conduct the ordinary operationsof railway administration,
but for the purpose of check-mating the chicanery of corporate competitors. In other
words, these exceptionally high salaries are paid for the purpose, and because their recipi-
ents are believed to have the ability to hold up their end in unscrupulous corporate war-
fare where, as one railwaj' president expressed it, "the greatest liar conies out ahead."
With the government operating the railways, there would be no conflictiug interests
necessitating the employment of such costly officials whose diplomatic talents might well
be dispensed with, while the running of trains, and the conduct of the real work of opera-
ting the roads, could be left to the same officials as, at moderate salaries, now perform
such duties, and consolidation of all the conflicting interests in the hands of the govern-
ment will enable the people to dispense with the services of the high-priced managers
now almost exclusively engaged in "keeping even with the other fellow" as well as with
the costlj' staffs assisti.ig such managers in keeping even, and the savings resulting may
be estimated at from $-1,000,000 to ;f5,000,000 per year.

Government control will enable railway users to dispense with the services of such
high-priced umpires as Mr. Aldace F. Walker, as well as of all other officials of 68 traffic
associations, fruitlessly laljoriug to prevent each of 500 corporations from getting the start
of its fellows, and trying to prevent each of the 5( 0 from absorbingan undue share of the
traffic. Itappears that each of these costly peac(-n akiug attachments has an average of
seven corporations to watch.

Referring to traffic associatif n^, and the r vain endeavors to keep the corporations
within sight of cemmercial ethics the Interstate Commerce Comnji^sion says: "But the
most important provisions of the law have not so often been directly violated as they
have been nullified through devices, carefully framed with legal assistance, — here is one

60 SHOULD THE NATION OWN THE RAILWAYS?

•of the places where the high-priced lawyer gets iti his work— with a view to this very eud,
and in the belief that when brought to legal test the device hit upon would not be held by
the couitfi to be so distinctly opposed to the terms of- the law as to be criminally punish-
able." In this couuectiou it is well to remember what Mr. Dillon tells us of the ease
with which the laws can be evaded.

With national ownership the expenditures involved in the maintenance of traffic
associations would be saved and railway users relieved of a tax that, judging from the re-
ports of a limited number of corporations of their contributions towards the support of
such organizations, must annually amount to between four and five million dollars.

Of the six hundred corporations operating railways probably five hundred main-
tain costly general oflices where president, treasurer and secretary spend the time sur-
rounded by an expensive staff". The majority of such ofiices are off the lines of the respeeli ve
corporations in the larger cities where high rents are paid and great expenses are entailed
that proper attention may be given to the bolstering or depressing the price of the cor-
poration's shares as the management may be long or short of the market. So far as the
utility of the railways is concerned, as instruments of anything but speculation, such of-
.fice:? and officers might as well be located in the moon and their cost saved to the public.
The average yearly cost of sucli offices and officers is more than $.50,000 and the transfer
of the railways to the nation would, in this matter alone, effect an annua! saving of more
than ?2.5.000,000 as both offices and officials could be dispensed with and the service be no
less efficient.

Moreover, with the nation owning the railways, the indirect but no less onerous
tax levied upon the industries of the country by the thousands of speculators who make
day hideous on the stock exchanges would be abrogated, as then there would be neither
railway share or bond for these harpies to make shuttle-cocks of, and this would be an-
other economy due to such ownership.

Railways spend enormous sums in advertising, the most of wbicli national owner-
ship would save, as it would be no more necessary to advertise the advantages of any par-
ticular line than it is to advertise the advantages of any given mail route. From reports
made by railway cjrporations to some of the Western States, it appears that something
over one per cent, of operating expenses are absorbed in advertising, aggregating some-
thing liUe ?7, 000 ,000 per year, of which we may assume that but $5,000,000 would be saved,
as it would be still desirable to advertise train departures and arrivals.

A still greater expense is involved in the maintenance of freight and passenger
offices ofl;" the respective lines, for the purpose of securing a portion of the competitive
traffic. In this way vast sums are expended in the payment of rents and as salaries of
hordes of agents, solicitors, clerks, etc., etc. Taking the known expenditures for tliis pur-
pose of a given mileage, it is estimated that the aggregate is not less than $15,000,000
yearly, all of which is a tax upon the public that would be saved did the government op-
erate the railways.

Under government control discriminations against localities would cease, whereas
now localities are discriminated against because managers are interested in real estate
elsewhere or are interested in diverting traffic in certain directions. Again, under cor-
porate management, it is for the interest of the company to haul a commodity as far as
possible over its own lines (with the government owning all the lines this motive will
lose its force) and thus traffic is forced into unnatural channels. For instance, much of
the grain from Kansas should find its way to foreign markets via the short route to the
Gulf, the distance to tide water by this route being less than half what it is to the Atlantic;
yet so opposed to this natural route are the interests of the majority of the corporations
controlling the traffic associations which now dictate to the people what routes their traffic
shall take, that the rates to the Gulf are kept so high as to force the traffic to the lakes
and to the Atlantic, and as all the railways leading to the Gulf have lines running east-
Mard, the much lauded corporate competition fails to help out the citizens of Kansas,
who are subjected to the domination of the new tyrant denominated a "Traffic Associa-
tion." With the nation operating the railways all this would be changed and localities
favorably located would be abls to reap the benefits which such location should give, and
should such a condition ever obtain the farmers of Western Iowa will not then shin corn

SHOULD THE NATION OWN THE RAILWAYS? 61

to the drouth-stricken portion of Kansas fcir fifteen cents per one hundred pounds wliile
the Kansas corn-grower, living; within seventy-five miles of (he same market, is charged
ten cents per one hundred pounds for a haul onc-eijrlith as lon>;;. By such rates the rail-
ways force the hauling of corn from Iowa to Wes'cn Kansas, and then force the corn-
grower of Central Kansas to send his corn eastward, the result being two long haids
where one short one would suffice, but then the corporations would have absorbed less of
the substance of the people.

Another and incalculable benefit which would result from national ownership
would be the relief of state and national legislation from the pressure and corrupting prac-
tices of railway corporations, which constitute one (if the greatest dangers to which re.
publiciin institutions can be subjected. This alone renders the nationalization of the rail-
ways most desirable, and at the same time such nationalization would have the effect of
emancipating a large part of the press from a galling thraldom to the corporations.

With the nation operating the railways we may have some hope that rates will be
reduced by some system resembling the Hungarian zone, which has had the efTect of re-
ducing local passenger rates about forty per cent., resulting in such an increase of tratflc
as to greatly increase the revenues of the roads, the average of rates liy ordinary third-class
trains being about three-fourths of a cent per mile, and one and a half cents per mile for
first-class express trains.

In Victoria the parcel or express business is done by the government railways, and
the rates are not one-half what they are with us when farmed out to a second lot of cor-
porations. Space does not permit the discussion or even the statement of the many salu-
tary phases of government control as developed in the various countries of Europe, and
it is not necessary as there are abundant rrasons to be found in conditions existing at
home for making the proposed change.

By far the most menacing feature of continued corporate ownership isthe power
over the money markets, which it places in the hands of unscrupulous men, any half
dozen of whom can, at such a time as that following the failure of the Barings, destroy
the welfare of millions and plunge the country into all the horrors of a money panic.
Whether it be true or not there are many who believe that a small coterie who had in-
formation before the public of the condition of Baring Brothers, and that a block of many
millions of railway securities, held by that house, were being (or soon would be) pressed
upon the market, entered into a conspiracy for the purpose of locking up money, and
thereby depressing prices in order to secure, at low cost, the control of certain coveted
railways. The railways were secured, and the e is not much doubt that they had been
lying in wait for such a critical condition of the money markets to accomplish this pur-
pose, which still further enhances their power for evil. With the railways nationalized
not only would there be no temptation for such nefarious operations but the power of
such men over values would be greatly lessened if not wholly destroyed as there would
be no railway shares for them to play fast and loose with and as money, instead of being
tied up in loans on chromos representing little but water would seek investment in bona-
flde enterprises their operations would have little influence and would certainly have no
such baleful power over the industries of the country as their ability to affect the value of
railway shares — on which such immense sums are now loaned on call — gives them they
being able, by locking up a few millions when the money-market is in the condition
which obtained at the time of the Baring collapse, to force the calling of loans and the
slaughtering of vast numbers of shares carrying the control of the railways they covet.
If only for the purpose of divesting "the dangerous wealthy classes" of this
frightful power, national ownership would be worth many times its cost, and without
such ownership a score of manipulators are soon likely to be complete masters of the re-
public and all its industrial interests; hence the question reverts to the form stated in the
opening of this paper: Shall the nation accept as a master a polBical party that may be
dislodged by the use of the ballot or shall the republic be dominated by a master in the
form of a score of unscrupulous Goulds, Vanderbilts and Huntingtons who cannot be dis-
lodged and who never die?

62 SHOULD THE NATION OWN THE RAILWAYS?

Assuming that J!30 000 per mile is the maximum cost of existing raiI^^•ays— as is
shown in "The Arena" ior February— and that tliere are 160,000 miles, it would give
a total valuation of $4,800,000,000, but that there may be uo compluint that the nation ia
dealing unfairly with the owners of much water, it will be well to add 25 per cent, to
what will be found to be the outside value of the railways when condemned under the
law of eminent domain, and assuming that $6,000,000,000 of three per ceut. bonds are is-
sued in order to make payment therefor, and it involves an interest charge of 1180,000,000,
to which add $670,000,000, as the cost of maintenance and operation, and $50,000,000 as a
sinking fund, and we have a total annual cost for railway service, of 4900,000,000 as against
a present cost of $1,050,000,000 ($950,000,000 from traffic earnings, and |85, 000,000 from
other sources of railway revenue), resulting in a net annual saving to the public of J150,
000.000, to which must be added the various savings which it has been estimated would
result from government control, and which, for the convenience of the reader, are here
recapitulated, namely:

Saving from consolidation of depots and stafTs S 20,000.000

Saving from exclusive use of shortest routes 25,000,000

Saving in attorneys' salaries and legal expenses 12,000,000

Saving from the abrogation of the pass evil .30,000,000

Saving from the abrogation of the commission system 20 000,000

Saving by dispensing with high priced managers and staffs ■1.000 000

Saving by disbanding traffic associations 4.000,000

Saving l;)y dispensing with presidents, etc 25,000,000

Saving by abolisliing (all but local) offices, solicitors, etc 15,000.000

Saving of five-sevenths of the advertising account 5,000,000

Total savings by reason of better administration $160,000,000

It would appear that after yearly setting aside $50,000,000 as a sinking fund, that
there are the best of reasons for believing that the cost of the railway service would be
$310,000,000 less than under corporate management.

That 16,000,000,000 is much more than it would cost to duplicate existing railways,
will not be questioned by the disinterested familiar with late reductions in the cost of
construction, and that such a valuation is excessive is manifest from the fact that it is
much more than the market value of all the railway bonds and shares in existence.

Mr. John P. Meany, in the RaUtvay Review of February 7th, 1891, says: "It ia
safe tc assume tlwt the market valuation of the entire $4, .500,000,000 of railroad stock in
existence would not average more than $30 per share, or say $1,350,000,000 in all." And
in his Sun article he states that fully $.500,000,000 of this stock is duplicated, so that the
"live" capital stock outstanding is really but $4,000,000,000. which, at .^.'iO pershare, would
have an aggregate value of $1,200,000,000. Mr. ISIeanj' states that there are also duplica-
tions of bond issues amounting to some $300,000,000, leaving the live outstanding bonds
at $4,500,000,000, and many corporations failing to pay interest, some issues are selling as
low as 12 per cent, of par, making it safe to call the average market value of bonds 90 per
cent, of their face value, and their aggregate value $4,050,000,000. to which adil value of
"live" capital stock, $1,200,000,000, and the total market value of bonds and stock is $5,.
250,000,000, being at the rate of $32,800 per mile for the 160,000 miles in operation.

After many years of familiarity with the turgid and obscure statements issued by
American railway corporations, and which are usually of such a character that the more
they are studied the less the shareholder knows of the affairs of the corporation, it is
very refreshing to read the report of the Railway Commissioners of any one of the Austra-
lian colonies, where every item of expenditure is made clear, and where words are not
used for the purpose of misleading.

The last Victorian report shows this new and sparsely settled country as able to
borrow money, with which to build national railways, at 3J per cent, per annum. How
many American corporations are able to borrow money at such a rate? 'I'li is saving in
fche interest charge di»etly benefits the public, and is due to national ownciship, and a
like saving will be made by the nationalization of American railways.

This report also shows that while the country is so rugged that in many cases the
gradients are as great as 130 feet per mile, and the cost of labor and supplies more than

SHOULD THE NATION OWN THE RAILWAYS? 63

here, the roads are operated at less cost, as measured by the expense per train mile, than
In the favored regions of the United States. The Kansas City, Fort Scott and Memphis
Railway is, admittedly, one of the best managed and most economically operated raihvayg
in the West, and with an abundance of very cheap coal,* low gradients and running more
trains than do the Victorian railways, should be operated much more cheaply, yet the
cost of operating this road, as measured by the cost per train mile, — and this is the best
possible criterion of economj' in operation — is one-third greater than on the government
owned railways of Victoria.

An excellent measure of the efficiency of the management is the number of casual-
ties, as proportioned to tlie number of passengers carried and men employed, wliich is
very great in such countries as Russia, Roumania and Portugal; butin Victoriaand other
Australiari colonies, the proportion isfarless than in the United States, more attention be-
ing given to the adoption of such safety devices as interlocking switches, etc., and all
the stations and crossings are provided with gates and otherwise better guarded than
with us where the corporations are much more intent upon paying dividends than in
serving thepul)lic, or in saving life and limb, while on the government operated railways
of Victoria, the management devotes its attention— with due regard to economy— to the
Convenience, comfort and safety of railway users, and employes, having no bond or share-
holders to provide for.

In the United States one of the useless traffic associations pays its chief umpire
nearly as much as Victoria pays its entire commission.

Those desirous of entering the railway service of Victoria arc subjected to such
rigid examination as to qualifications and character, that but little more than one-third
are able to p.ass the ordeal, and a high standard of excellence in the personnel of the service
results, and when these servants are disabled, or worn out by long service, they are pen-
sioned or given a retiring allowance, and this system tends to reduce the inclination to
strike, as a man who has been years in the service will long hesitate before he forfeits his
right to a provision of this kind.

All the Australian reports and accounts, which liave come under the observation
of the writer, are models of conciseness and clearness and show that there is nothing in-
herent in railway accounts rendering it necessary that they be made obscure and mis-
leading.

Neither in tlie Australian reports nor in the Colonial press is there the least evidence

of discriminations against individuals or localities, and this one fact is an argument of

greater forcein favor of national ownership than all that have everbeen advanced against it.

•Co.al on tlie line iiamerl Is worth about $1.50 per ton at the mines, while inferior coal Is worth $3.75
per ton at the mines in Victoria.

THE ECOXO.MLST'S OPINION OF MARKET WRECKING.

The claim is persistently made, by the opponents of the Butterworth bill, that
short-selling can in no wise injure the producer of cotton, grain and other staple produetsi
but on the other hand is a great and inestimable benefit to the producer, and that the
agitation of the subject is carried on by demagogues for the purpose of irritating the
farmer and leading him to place Itimself in opposition to the very men who, by their
sliort-selling, create a market for his products and enable him to secure a better price.
Without asking if the practice of short-.selling can possibly increase the number of con-
sumers or tlie per capita consumption, a sufficient answer to all that lias ever been ad-
vanced in favor of short-selling is to be found in the Juue 20th issue of so pronounced an
organ of Chicago interests as the Chicago Eoonomiat, where it is said, editorially, that:

64 THE ECONOMIST'S OPINION OF MARKET WRECKING.

"This is the season wlien farmers begin to grnnilile ii,a::iinst Boards of Trade, and
assert that sliort-sellers are engaged in their usual efl'ort to nialce a low market for farm
products. There is some ground for their irritation. It is po?sible that the system nf
trading in futures, now so popular, has been carried to an abuse. * * » * It is within
the range of possibility that the Exchanges may be brought to see that after all a change
in the system of trading may not operate to their disadvantage. It may be found possible
to trade in grain (and cotton) on a cash basis, as stoclis are traded in on the New York
Exchange. No pretense is made that the volume of speculation is curtailed to any im-
portant extent in stoclo, by reason of the fact that all transactions are strictly for cash
* * * * The seller of stocks may not have the stocks to deliver at the time he makes
the trade, but he must, in some manner, procure them. * * * * If he does not al-
ready own them, he does this by borrowing the stocks and paying therefor a small per-
centage, which percentage is regulated by the urgency of the demand from short-sellers.
Why could not this plan be put in force in regard to grain, (cotton, etc.)? Would not
such a system result in equalizing the carrying charges, which are u serious handicap upon
investors and icjyon the property itself?

Under existing conditions grain and cotton is burthened with a taxfrotn the moment
the seed is put in the ground. This tax does not begin to accumulate, apparently, until
the grain has left the harvest field and is on the way to the great markets. But as a
matter of fact, the property is handicaped from its inception.

Investors and producers have the burthen to carry, and the short-sellers have the
advantage to the extent of the full accumulation of charges of all sorts — transportation,
storage, insurance, commissions, etc. They (the short-sellers) figure that the pr&ptrty
cannot carry this burthen and advance to a point beyond it which will give the holders of
the ( real ) property a profit.

They argue generally that grain ( and cotton ) will not be worth any more one, twO'
or six months hence than now, and that they have just the advantage over investors aud
producers which is represented by all these accumulated charges (as they invest nothing
in the sort of stuff in which they deal ) hence they feel a certain degree of safety in ofl'er-
ing property (promises ) for future delivery at prices which pays them a liberal premium,
thereby gaining all these carrying chargesjusf as surely us if they owned the elevators in
which the grain was stored, the railroads upon which it was carried and the insurance
companies and banks which collect additional tolls.

If the short-seller.s were compelled to deliver the grain they sell and pay the owner
a per cent, for (he property to deliver on contracts the carrying charges would be fairly
equalized in the long run.

Possibly, also, this process might result in filling the warehouses with grain, for
capital will find profitable employment in investments in huge quantities of grain as a
basis for such operations. (And this would, at such seasons as when more grain was be-
ing marketed than was required for immediate consumption, relieve the market of undue
pressure).

"Excessive short-selling (all short-selling is excessive ) which is beyond any question
a burthen upon production, and a serious handicap upon investment of * * * capital
would be measurably reduced * * * and the onerous feature would be measurably
eliminated. ( If it is a wrong why not eliminate it wholly).

"A little experience might relieve the speculative trade of the horror which it now
feels of contact with the actual grain. * * * * A system of cash dealings would cer-
tainly give the producer an even chance with the short-seller, which he does not now en-
joy-"

"The strangulation of the Butterworth bill last winter merely postponed action; it.
did not kill the sentiment that was bacli of it, or remove the grievance."

C. A. PILLSBURY'S OPINION OF MARKET WRECKING.

The ulterauces of an organ of Chicago interests, in tlie best sense of the term, may
well be supplemented by the opinion of one who is. beyond a doul)t, the greatest dealer in
the world in the products of the soil, aud one who yearly grinds more than half as much
actual wheat into flour as reaches the Chicago markets.

The following eseerpts are made from an interview witii Mr. C. A. Pillsbury, pub-
lished in the Minneapolis Daih/ Market Jiecord:

"While talking with respect to the matter of limitation of wheat production, so
that for the last three years there has been a decrease of the reserves, Mr. C. A. Pillsbury,
the miller, says: ' If the world was entirely out of wheat at the end of this crop, imd our
crop was only eleven months' supjily, under the old method of doing business wheat
would .sell at from $1.50 to |2 per bushel, but under the new method the heavy short-seller
in Chicago would sell 10,000,000 or 1-5,000,000 bushels out while he was talking higher
markets, and then on some weak spot sell two or three millions more whe» there was no
demand for it, in order to break the markets down to 60 or 70 cents a bushel, then buy in
his short sales, and this would discnurage all holders of wheat, until the scarcity was ac-
tually felt aud there was hardly anyone holding any wheat to get the benefit of the ad-
vance.

•'Mr. C. Wood Davis, in a recent elaborate article in the "Arena" gave his conclus-
ions that the consumption of wheat throughout the world had already overtaken
production, and at so earlj' a date as 1896 the United States will have ceased to e.xport
wheat."

"In reference to Mr. Davis' idea Mr. Pillsbury said: / think Mr Davis' theory is
right, but it will not do any one much good, no matter hoiv short the crops are, until short-
selling of wheat by those ivho do not own a bushel can be stopped. As I said before, farm-
ers may talk about railroad and elevator charges, but if the elevators handled their wheat
for nothing aud railroads hauled it without compensation, these benefits would not be-
gin tooflfset the injuries which they receive from the Board of Trade."

''My opinion is that we have been eating uji the wheat reserve duriiig the last five
years and that at the end of the last crop the visible (sujyply) all over the world was about
as low as practicable on even the new method of doing business and carrying stock, and I
shall be surprised if before a new crop is fit to use, we do not see a worse situation."

■'As long, however, as this short selling is not circumscribed by the strong arm of
the law these advances in wheat will only come at the latter end of the crop year when
farmers have sold nearly all their grain, and when neither the farmers nor the mercantile
communities nor the business men in the State wifl get the benefit of the fact that the
world is not producing as much bread-stufl'as it is consuming."

-<•**■-

THE MARKET WRECKER PREVENTS AN ADVANCE IN VALUES.

Not only is the world short of food by reason of a deficient cultivaleil acrea;. e, but
the disaster which has befallen the crops of Europe renders it certain that the last of the
reserves will disappear and the grain harvested in 1892 go into empty granaries, and Ihiit
the supplies for the 1892-3 cereal year will be trenched upon by enormous drafls made
upon India, South America and Australasia, early in 1892. for the purpose of fteding the
famishing people of Europe and this exhaustion of all reserves; ihe trenching upon
future supplies an<l the well established deficient acreage would assure high prices fcr a
long term of years but for shoit selling upon the Boards of Trade, such practices cousli-

66 THE MARKET WRECKER PREVENTS ADVANCE IN VALUES.

tuting an evil of great magnitude as well as a great menace to the prosperity of t)ie
farmer, and, by lessening his purchasing power, a like menace to the prosperity of all em-
ployed in production or distribution.

So long as the marljet wrecking option dealer, without owning or controlling a
pound of the products that he offers to sell in limitless (luantities, can determine prices
by placing his fictitious products in competition with the products of the farm, just .so
long will the fiirmer be uncertain of a reward for the labor and capital employed, and
just so long will short periods of great commercial activity be followed by prolonged ones
of stagnation.

The immoral practices of the short-seller have yearly deprived the farmer of from
ten to twenty-five per cent, of the price he otherwise would have obtained for his products,
and in this way his purchasing power has been greatly lessened, resulting in equal loss to
the artisan, 'laborer, manufacturer, merchant and transporter, and a like loss is menaced
so long as the short-selling market wrecker is permitted to pursue the nefarious calling o'
placing his fictions in competition with the products of the farm.

It requires land upon which to grow real products, and in the United States there
is employed in the production of food, fiber and forage 700,000,000 acres, or more, and
every pound of the products of the soil which the farmer offers represents the expend-
iture of a definite amount of money and labor, and the volume of product which he can
offer is limited by the amount of land in cultivation, its fertility and meteorological con-
ditions which last reader the result sufficiently uncertain without the baleful work of the
sliort-seller. On the other hand the short-selling market wrecker neither owns nor needs
land; he expends no money in producing what he offers; neither does he toil; his crop is
subject to no climatic contingencies; is harvested without labor, and the amount offered
is limited only by his assurance and lung power, both of which are phenomenal, avdyet
it is these limitless offers of fictions which have cost neither money nor effort — and not what
the farmer has produced at the cost of such infinite care and labor — which determines
the price which the farmer shall receive for the products of his land and toil. Thus does
the market wrecker reap where he has not sown. Thus does this worthless drone despoil
the industrious farmer of a just reward for his labor.

How mucli longer shall the farmer's products, grown at an enormous expenditure
of capital and labor, be forced to compete with the limitless and costless products of the
lungs of the short-seller?

Is there another business that is subjected to such unfair and immoral competition?

Would other than farmers submit to such gross injustice when they have the
power to control legislation and could, by the enactment of laws taxing the "Board-of-
Trade-Gambler" out of existence, secure the reward due for their labors and yet fail to do
so while their products are forced to compete with the imaginary products of a horde of
parasites and harpies?

Are not the harpies of the "Board of Trade" as much worse than the managers of a
''bunco or skin game" as the stealing of hundreds of millions a year from those who take
no pari in the game is worse than the taking a few dollars from some fellow who volun-
tarily goes into a skin game thinking he has a sure thing of turning up the right card
and thus beating the dealer? In the market-wrecking game the farmer is not even given
a chance, by the three-card sharps of the Board-of- Trade, to see the cards that rob him of
the reward for his labor.

For years the market-wreckers have been able, by the short-selling device, to de-
prive the farmer of a due reward and notwithstanding the deficient — world's— acreage
they will remain a grave menace to his prosperity, and that of the country, so long as
permitted to pursue their nefarious calling cif .■■elling the crops before they are grown; of
selling the property of the farmer, without his consent, and thereby fixing a price for
property in which they have no legitimate interest.

Although existing abnormal conditions may enable the farmer — despite the baleful
work of the short-seller— to get more than usual for tliis yeai'sciop of grain, even if much
less than what they should receive, yet the wreckers have taken and are likely to retain
complete control of the cotton market until they have forced the cotton grower to the

THF, MARKET WRECKER PREVENTS ADVANCE IN VALUES. 67

condition in which they liad placed the }j:rain grower until sliort crops enabled the niar-
kel to get partially from under their conlrol, but let there be but the promise of fair I'lain
crops next summer and the wrecl<er will resume entire control of the markets and pi ices
be again hammered down to an unreinuneralive level and tlie process of depressing prices
below a natural level continue until the marlct-wrecker sludl have been taxed out
of existence.

SOME PHASES OF SHORT SELLING.

The short-seller produces nothing; he performs no service, and is but a destroyer of
the value of other men's property.

The legitimate trader, be he a buyer either for immediate consumption or to hold
for an advance, takes the product ofl'Ihe market thereby steadying demand and enabling
the producer to secure a fair price for his property.

The short-seller needs little or no capital to enable him to wreck values as is made
clear by the failures of Dunham & Co. and Pardridge. Dunham, with a capital of but
$-•5,000, was carrying a line of shorts aggregating 10.000,000 bushels; equal to but two and a
half cents per bushel, and this fiat grain, represent ingsnch an insignificant sum in forfeits
put up to assure the other gambler that Dunham would not go back on the game, came
in direct competition with and depressed the price (just as effectually as though it were
real grain) of that grown by the farmer at the cost of much expenditure of capital and
iutiuite labor. Could anything be more unfair?

When, by the sudden advance of wheat in August, the great bear (Pardridge) wag
forced into liquidation at a reported loss of 11.000,000, he must have had out a short line
of at least 20.000,000 bushels, as the advance was but 5 cents, and as he had been repeat-
edly called for margins during the advance, it would appear that the actual investment in
these enormous short sales — equal to nearly one-twentieth of an average crop — could not
have exceeded two cents a bushel and yet this man has, repeatedly, with such relatively
infinile.simal investments, been able to depress the price of all the grain owned by mill-
ions of farmers and deprive them of the reward due for their labors.

In a published interview he is reported to have said that: "Had not my money
given out I could and would have sent the price of wheat to 75 cents; what I lost was only
velvet (prolils) from my operations since April."

In the four mouths requiied to secure profits reported to be $1,000,000, what were
the losses of American farmers consequent upon the operations of these short-selling
gamblers ?

Can there be a reasonable doubt that in consequei.ci; of short-selling the producer
is forced to accept from ten to twenty-tive per cent, less for his cotton snd grain than he
ought to and otherwise would receive?

If Board of Trade meu must gamble why not bet on a game of poker or faro, or
upon a horse race? In such case only the participants, or possibly their employers from
whom has been stolen the money wagered, would suffer injury.

Short-selling enables the European to throw immense quantities of fictitious prod-
ucts upon our markets thereby depressing the price when he tates in the cash product
at the price he has established by such nefarious practices. Moreovf r, when he ha.")
bought a cargo of Indian or Russian wheal he sells an equal quantity short in our mar-
ket, and thus forces the American farmer, by the short-selling device, to become hia
insurer and, this loo, without paying him a cent of premium. By the short-selling
device the American farmer is made to assume all (he risks atlendant upon European
importation of wheat bought from his competitors in India and llussia.

68 SOME PHASES OF SHORT SELLING.

By selling the growing crop short the market wrecker is continually proclaiming
that it will be so great as to swamp llie markets of the world, and by persistently pursu-
ing this course he is often able to make both producer and consumer believe that such is
the case.

Prices are never as low as the market-wrecl^er says they should be, and the lower
they get, with profits in h::ud, the harder th<-y pound them with limitless otters.

In selling short a product which ha:8 cost neither money nor effort, the market-
wrecker requires liL*le besides audacity, lung power and an imagination which can evoke
enormous crops and commercial disaster at will. Such is his entire capital and stock in
trade, and yet so enormous is the volume of these transactions in fictions that immense
sums — in the aggregate— are constantly tied up in margins; sums probably several times
as great as would be required to handle all the actual grain seeking a market, and in this
way is a needless tax levied upon the industries of the country and a fictitious scarcity of
money brought about, such scarcity tending, at all times, to still further depress prices
for real products.

The reductions iu the price of products which the operations of the market-wrecker
eflfect are doubtless such as to absorb a very large proportion of the ordinary profits of
production thus greatly lessening the purchasing power of the farmer and this, by reae- .
tion, directly affects the prosperity of all employed in distribution, or other forms of
production, hence the entire community suffers from the evil of short-selling.

When wheat is selling at $1 the short-seller goes upon the market and offers it for
delivery one to six months in the future for 95 cents, and can only secure a profit by
breaking tlie price, and iu order to do this resorts to the fabrication of such falsehoods as
his experience leads him to believe will effect the end desired. He relies upon such fab-
rications, not the offering of actual products, to reduce the price to a level that will permit
his winniug the wager.

Frequently the big bears cry the market down by persistent offerings of immense
quantities while their brokers, upon the other side of the pit, are taking all that them-
selves and other parties offer, so that even should the market happen to advance they
cannot lose while they are thus enabled to cover outstanding short sales at a profit on that
bought from others at the price they have established by their "wash sales," as is shown
in the following telegrams from a broker to his principal at Kansas City:

"Chicago, June 4th, 1891.— J. S. & Co., Kansas City: Ribs ninety, lard twenty-
five, pork fifty, easy. Bears hammering but buying through brokers. Roberts."

From and to same parties on the same day:

"MarUet steady now; bears doing everything to break market; weakness of corn
helping them. Robkrts."

Destroy the profits of short-selling by placing a suflficient tax upon every such
transaction and every incentive to force a decline would disappear, and when such
incentive disappears prices will be aftected only by the volume of real products offer-
ing, and supply and demand will once more determine iu which direction values shall
move, and every dealer being an owner will have a direct interest in sustaining prices,
whereas the great majority of the so-called dealers are now interested iu depressing prices,
as their entire profits are derived from short-selling.

All Board of Trade speculators derive tneir support from the unjust tolls which
short-selling enables them to levy upon the farmer and as they are, like other ganiblers,
reckless spendthrifts and most extravagant livers and number, with their alljliated
hordes, at least 20,000; and assuming that tliolr annual expenditures are no more than
$5,000 each, it follows that these worse than u.selcss parasites yearly mulct the farmers of
the country in the sum of iflOO, 000. 000. What is worse than this they act as a magnet
that draws many of the brightest youths into this whirlpool, and most of the embezzle-
ments of bank presidents, casliiers, clerls and tellers, as well as tho:-e of the empli>yes of
commercial houses, are due and directly traceable to the craze for speculative gambling
that has its birthplace and habitat upou the Board of Trade.

Add but ten per cent, to the value of the products of the farm by destroying short-
selling and the farmer would not only be able to pay his debts, but those of the Nation,
State and Municipality.

SOME PHASES OF SHORT SELLING. 69

Was it impossible to wreck values by sliort-sellinj? prices would be far more steady
and monied men would be willing to l)uy actual products for investment, but now so fre-
i|uent, erratic and rapid are the lluctuatioiis in values, consequent upon the continual
ell'ort of the short-seller to put down prices, that the merchant is deterred from investing
in property tlie price of which is determined by such abnormal metlKids.

It has lona; been axiomatic that property that is hawked from one to another in
search of a buyer becomes stale and pracliially unsalable at anything near its real value,
anil this is just what tlie short-seller and non-owner is constantly doing with property of
\\\r (:ivnier wif/iout the owner's consent and against his most earnest protest. The result
is that wliich always follows when property is tlius hawked about in search of a buyer.
There is but one remedy possible, and that is for Congre.ss to exercise the taxing power
for the protection of the live millions of cotton and grain growers and tax the 20,000 mar-
ket-wrecking short-selling gamblers of the Boards of Trade out of existence, and thus
relieve production of an intolerable burthen.

The market wrecker has erected a toll bridge on the highway of conmierce where
there is no stream to cross.

Should not farmers, in and out of season, write and talk to their senators and rep-
reaentatives in Congress persistently until the Butterworth bill, or even a more effective
measure, becomes a law?

Why should not the farmer make life a burthen to the law maker until he grants
the required protection to the greatest industry of the nation ?

Shall all other interests be "protected" and only the farmer be left without the
sadly needed protection while he alone is taxed for the benefit of the ' protected classes?"

OPINIONS, PROFESSIONAL AND OTHER, OF MARKET WRECKING.

The great short-seller (Pardridge) is reported to have said to the reporter of a Chi-
cago paper that had his money not have run short — he was unable to create fiat money
as readily as he could flat grain— he could and would have forced the price of wheat to 75
cents, and one of his brokers said that if wheat was selling at .5 cents per bushel he would
be unhappy if he could not force it to four and a half.

Leopold Bloom, who made a million or more by gambling on the Board and ia
reported to have lost $35,000 in a "brace" game of faro with two other Board of Trade
operators (and which he refused to pay), hence is competent to express an opinion of
Board of Trade as well as other varieties of gambling, says that:

"It is too much of a strain on a man. One is under pressure all the time. He la
betting his money against the market. If he buys and she goes up he wins, but if she
goes down he is a loser. Its aplain game of gamble, but it's legal and laro isn't. If they
would tak". the limit off faro it would he a better game than wheat, because you could get
quicker action; but with the limit on tliere isn't money enough in it. A fellow who is play-
ing agiiii;st the market (against legitimate supply and demand) takes a good many
chances, and now that I've got enough to keep me comfortably I want to rest."

May 28th, 1891, the Board of Trade firm of Keunett & Hopkins is reported to have
said:

"From a statistical standpoint the position of wheat has not been strong-^r for
many years, but the huge offerings by the bears breaks down the price in the face of the
strongest conditions. This may go on for weeks notwithstanding the grain moves east-
ward in a great flood and is exported as soon as it reaches tide water."

Observed Robert Li ud bloom:

"It is hard to buck against the millions of wind wheat that we have to contend
with in the wheat pit. The bears are determined that the legitimate news shall produce

70 OPINIONS OF MARKET WRECKING.

n ) eflect. We point to the large clearances; tbey say bah ! that is mostly flour; we note
thi large sales of wheat at St. Louis for export, and they cry, O! th:it is only Oregon
wheat: we hear of the cleaiance of 700,000 bushels during tlie last two days fmni the prin-
cipal Atlantic ports aud t ley go into the pit and s-eil 20.000,000 liusliel.s of wii.d; mean-
while a great deal of money is made through these deals, and the quistiou aritos if it is
not the farmer who contributes it?"

Under the date of May 13th, 1891, a great B^ard of Trade house writes:

"There has been tremendous selling of wheat lately upon .luiie acenery. June is
still weeks off but the scenery is here all the same, and the almanac players ;ire discount-
ing their theory by taking an early start. The mob is now jumping on wheat and i v,'r
lastingly whooping it up on that side. It has again become a sure thing to sell wluat
short."

When speaking of the efTorts of the Chicago Board of Trade to suppress the
bucket shops, Mr. C. A. Pillshury, the great Minneapolis miller, is reported as saying:

'A step which would cure the whole trouble would be to stop the selling of gr.iin
for future delivery except by parties who absolutely own or control the product, and
would be able to deliver it if called upon. I believe this will be done within a few years,
even if the constitution of the United States has to be amended in order to do it.

"It is a perfect mystery to me that the Farmers' Alliances are paying attention to
minor evils and overlooking this vampire which is susking their very life blood.

"The legitimate situation has been such during the last three or four years that
wheat should have sold at one dollar per bushel at any railroad station in Minnesota.
This tremendous short-selling of hundreds of millions of bushels, which the jjurty selling
does not own nor ever expect to own, has knocked the bottom out of the market, as these
wind offerings and sales have just as much effect upon the market as genuine transac-
tions, and the big bears have been so successful and made such enormous profits from
their short sales that they now have an immense following, and the evil has assumed tre-
mendous proportions.

'Production throughout the world, as a whole, has not increased during the last
five, and possibly ten years, yet if this short-selling is not stopped there will be no
advance in price, despite this fact, escept in case of grave disaster to the crops over wide
areas.

"The Chicago Board of Trade is now moving in the right direction, but after closing
the bucket shops let them close the gambling on their own Board and confine their busi-
ness to legitimate transactions. When this is done the whole western country would see
such prosperity as has not been known for many years. The legitimate conditions are alj
right for it, but the illegitimate conditions could not be worse."

Mr. Hugh McLennan, one of the earliest traders in grain in Chicago, writes:

"The baker and miller in Europe who in former days had to consider supplies for
coming months, is now quieted with his daily cable from Chicago that May wheat is off
one cent. Wheat in Chicago is now selling five cents below the average price for last
October, while the price in Liverpool is about the same as then. The English markets
have held up in spite of the depressing influences exerted from this side of the Atlantic."

"Commission Merchant," in a a communication to the Chicago TVihune, writes:

"Every one engaged in the actual handling of grain is asking the cause of the low
prices, and many are beginning to recognize the fact that the practice of short-selling has
much to do with it, and especially the recent custom of selling immense lines of (short)
grain for delivery five or six months from the date of sale."

In the Tribune market report for January 1.3tli, it is said that:

"With every encouragement for an advance in prices and a bullish interpretation
of the government report to aid them, the local produce maikets, after a brief flurry at the
opening, declined materially and closed at the lowest point of the day. The depression
was due to the raiding of the heavy shorts, who knew their only salvation lay in a suc-
cessful raid."

In characterizing the stock gamblers of Wall street, the Chicago Tribune used the
following language, only it is here paraphrased and applied to the Board of Trade market
wreckers, to whom it is even more clearly applicable than to those of the Stock Exchange:

"The scum of the United States is gathered upon the Boards of Trade to speculate
in the necessaries of life. There is no honesty in the business. Part of it is the outwork-
ing of cool calculation to rob by hoodwinking the public, inducing men to sell when they
ought to buy if they did anything. The rest is blind chance, a simi)le betting on the
course of prices, and a great deal of it is nothing but the buying and sellinffof "privi-
leges" which entitles the one party to call for or deliver a quantity of the stuff pretended
to be dealt in at a named i)rice if he chooses to do so within some specified time.

"But for the operation of the gamblers lluse alle^'ed products would not be dealt in.
What possible difference can it make to the welfare of the country whether the gamblers

OPINIONS OF MARKET WRECKING. 71

continue to exist or nut? If tliey were nil to be olcaned out (a la Pardridgo) the people

would not only be no worse oH'. but aetunlly vastly better."

The St. Louis Republic of August 20lh, 1891, says editorially:

''When 11,000,000 bushels of wheat are sold in one day on one Merchants' E.^cchange,

how long will it take to handle the whole crop? And that licins first found, how long

will it take to handle a poker deck so as to regulate the wheat supply and estnhlhhiU pricet

Aside from the disastrous effects of these gambling practices upon the producer,
who is an innocent and involuntary victim, they arc equally disastrous to the gambler
whom they rob of all right feeling.

Speaking of gambling in all its forms, an eminent Knglish authority says:

"Gambling not only lends to financial luin, but itproduces Ihe most heartless forms
of selfishness, and is especially fatal to delicacy and magnanimity of character. It is a
peculiarly mean and sordid vice."

Herbert Spencer, iu his Study of Sociology, presents two aspects of the immorality
of gambling when he says:

"It is gain without merit; and secondly, it is gain through another's loss. When-
ever the seller and the buyer are not mutually benelitted the transaction is immoral and
rotten and involves dishonesty and deceit on one side or the other."

Some of the moral aspects of gambling m farm products, and the incalculable
wrong it works the producer, is well set forth in a recent issue of the (Iowa) Homestead.
Says the Homestead:

"For owners of wheat to sell when at any given period they think the market price
is as good as it is going to be is one thing; for men who own no wheat, and mean to own
none, to sell for future delivery, is another and very diflereut thing. It is neither more
nor less, in substance, than a bet as to what the price will be at the date when, nominally,
the delivery is to be made. It is 'backing the judgment' just as much as though a stake
were set on the turn of a card. « * » * This backing of judgment, however,
is the simplest and least harmful form of grain gambling. The transactions of profes-
sional grain gamblers compare with this form about as a sold race, a brace game of faro
or Sir William Gordon-Cummings' dealings in baccarat compare with square games,
where risks are honestly taken and chance or legitimate skill is permitted to determine
them. The professionals, when a deal is decided upon, jump upon the market and sell
millions of bushels when they don't own a kernel; they follow the price down with
lower and still lower sales, using all kinds of false rumors — as to crops, failures of bankers,
and other conditions affecting products and mone.y — as clubs to beat down prices, and at
length, when prices have reached the lowest possible notch, they turn iu and 'cover
their shorts' at the low figure, reaping as stakes the difference between the higher figures
at which they have sold and the lower ones at which they have covered their 'short'
sales. The means employed to produce the depression, in point of honesty, is not a whit
superior to the cheating tricks of the professional card sharp.

"But this falls far short of a full statement of the moral evil involved in grain
gambling. When a hundred excited men jumpintoa Chicago grain pit and play a game,
the result of which, when telegraphed over the country, reduces the value of the contents of
ever 1/ producer's bin five to ten cents a bushel, the tendency of it all is to confuse the ideas
of right and wrong of every man upon whom loss has thus been inflicted.

"As an abstract proposition, every man will admit that demand and supply should
regulate price; yet the producers of the country have become so habituated to seeing the
law of demand and supply nullified to their injury by gambling manipulations that a
very large proportion of them would not hesitate to combine in the creation of an artifi-
cial scarcity if they saw their way clear to the accomplishment of such a result. If there
had never have been any cotton gambling there would never have been a sub-treasury
scheme, if there were no grain gambling there would have been no attempt at a 'farmers'
wheat corner.'

"Gambling in farm products has caused such wide-spread injury to persons not in
any manner engaged in it, that it is in large measure responsible for some confusion of
ideas as to the proposition to fight the devil with fire.

"The entire civilized world has lately been convulsed over the spectacle of a royal
came of baccarat at which there was said to have been some cheating, yet the evil of it
was confined to the persons engaged in the game. Possibly there are states in the Union
which do not make gambling a punishable offense; yet here again, the evil extends no
farther than to those who participate it it, or at most to their families. A number of
states have quite recently passed laws against pool selling; a species of gambling that ia
had enough to merit )irohibitiou, and yet infinitesimnlly trifling when compared with
the millions that an^ lost and won in grain (and cotton) gambling. Why should the law
punish those who play faro and wink at 'futures?' Why forbid poker and permit 'jiuts
and calls?' The former injures in purse and in morals perhaps, only the persons engaged

72 OPIi<IONS OF MARKET WRECKING.

iu it; the latter does as much, and besides injures the farmer morally and materially
although he be a thousand miles away; materially, for it makes him pay heavy losses on
a game in which he does not participate; morally, for it tends to undermine his patriotic
regard for a government that permits such injury to be inflicted u\>iiu him, and drives
him to adopt questionable methods of self protection.

"Organized society has neithersoul or future; it must take its punishment asitgoes
along. The sin of omission which permits a gigantic scheme of gambling under pretense
of commerce, involving in its evil effects the innocent with the guilty, will not escape
retribution.

"Congress recently adopted measures designed to prevent, to the extent of con-
gressional authority, the business of the Louisiana lottery and the moral sense of the
entire community sustained it in the act.

"Lotteries are wrong and demoralizing, and yrt they injure only those who volun-
tarily become their victims. Board of Trade gambling, on the contrary, while equally
wrong and demoralizing to the participants does immense injury to vast numbers of peo-
ple who have nothing whatever to do with it. As long as this form of ganililincr — which
is as bad morally as the worst — is permitted we can Imrdly escape the convicliiju of hav-
ing strained at the lottery gnat and swallowed the Board of Trade camel. Can the nation
aflTord further responsibility for a monster gambling scheme which inflicts great loss
upon so large a number of its most ind,ustrious and worthy citizens, even when they take
no voluntary part in the game? Is it not the duty of the nation to protect its citizens
from injuries against which no prudence or foresight on their part can shield them? Can
it hope for the patriotic affection of those whom it does not protect ? Is it not high time
that the moral sense of the country was aroused on this subject? This nation can not
afford to ignore the existence of a moral cancer so gigantic, knowing it to be a moral can-
cer. That it does know the immorality of gambling is proven by the manner in which
it treats oiher forms of the evil that are far less harmful.

"Nor should the high social position, wealth or church connection of its votaries
deter us from laying bare this iniquity, or the cry of paiu that comes from the brown
stone fronts stay the hand that holds the knife that is to rid the nation of this festering
ulcer."

-■<••►-

THE VALUE OF A TR.\DE JOURNAL'S DATA.

L mg before the writer began the systematic investigation of the world's food sup-
ply he had become convinced that much of the so-called data, as to production and con-
sumption, floating through the columns of the daily papers was either manufactured for
a purpose or was of a fugitive character; originating ii" one knew where; without parent-
age; utterly valueless and misleading; but while somewhat distrustful of some of the
tabular statements of the special trade journals — distrustful because of a lack of even ap-
parent accord emanatingfrom the same and variant sources — yet it was supposed thatthe
conductors of reputable journals at least would exercise due care and diligence in procuring
and tabulating reliable data, and in every case where official data was obtainable such
alone would be used and every precaution taken to verify even official statements of which
quantities and values formed a constituent part.

When a journal sets itself up as an instructor of the public and a purveyor of in-
formation, simple justice and honesty render it obligatory upon its conductors that they
exercise the utmost care to not only secure all and the latest available data and informa-
tion, but that it shall be of the highest possible character, and a journal failing to do this
writes itself down a pretender and charlatan, securing attention and the money of its
patrons by false and fraudulent ])retenses. Such a journal is clearly entitled to neither
confidence nor consideration at the hands of the people it has deceived and defrauded.

Busy men are unable to make original investigations, and rely upon specialists to
do it and make publication in tiade journals, and readily pay for such services— and the
writer, like other busy men had, from its reinilatiou, been led to accept the statements of

THE VALUE OF A. TRADE JOURNAL'S DATA. 73

the Cincinnati Price Current as reliable and trustworthy, although even in a hasty read-
ing of that journal he discovered a lack of that complete accord with (its) prior utterances
which should characterize the statements of every publication assuniin*; so important a
duty as that of furnishing producers, consumers, merchants, transpoilers and the gen-
eral public with information and numerical data in relation to so vital a subject as that
pertaining to the world's food supply and yet, such was tlio staudiug of the Price Cur-
rent that the writi'r long deemed it but little short of heresy to ijuc-^tion any of its state-
ments, be they tabular or other, but being iin|)elled, by tlieunprofitableriess of his farming
o)ierations, to undertaUe an investigation of the present (and prospective) productive
power of the tields of tlie temperate zones supplying the food of the bread eating world
he soon found that neither the current statements or the tabuhited data of I lie Price Cur-
rent accorded witli its previous utterances or with available official reports, many of its
divergencies being so far out of Hue as to seem intentional, and it appeared to be in the
habit of publishing any set of figures that would conform to the argument it desired to
make. Careful reading of the Price Ctirrrnt brought the conviction home to the writer
that a theory was first espou.sed and then figures adopted— if not manufactured— that
would sustain the theory.

To make it clear that little or no reliance can be placed upon tlie statemeuts and
data published by tlie Price Current, a small part of the errors crowding its pages during
recent weeks are instanced:

In its issue of July 0th the Price Current places the production of wlieat in France
in 1890 at 325,000,000 bushels and states the largest French crop during the past seven
years to have been 325,000,000 and the smallest to have been 273,000,000 bushels, when it
Is ofBcially stated, in the bulletins of the French Ministry of Agriculture for the years
1S87, 1888 and 1889, and by the United States Dep.irtmeut of Agriculture for 18S-1. 188-5,
1886 and 1890, that the seven crops have given the following quantities:

1884 .^24,130,000 bushels I 188S 280,177,000 busliels

1885 312,912,000 " | 1889 307.357,000 "

1886 304,427,000 " 11890 338,902,000 "

1886 319,094,000 " |

From this official data, all of which was available in publications of the Depart-
ment of Agriculture prior to the Price CurrerU's issue of July 9tli, we find that the largest
French crop of the seven years was 13,902.000 bushels greater and the smallest crop of the
seiies was 7,000,000 bushels greater than stated by the Price Current.

In thesame is^ue it states that the Russian crop of 1890 was 197,000,000 bushels, the
largest Russian crop of the seven years was 274,000,000 bushels and the .smallest 178.000,-
OOO, while the official figures show that tlie crop of 1890 — exclusive of Poland — was 205 -
972,000 bushels, the largest crop 295,711,000 and the smallest 163,000,000 bushels, or a dif.
ference, respectively, of 8,972,000 bushels, 21,711.000 bushels and 15,000,000.

In the same issue it tells us that the Italian wheat crop of 1890 was 126 000,000
bushels, the largest crop in seven years 129,000,000 bushels and the smallest one 103,000,-
OOO bushels. While this statement is but 640,000 bushels less than the ofBcial returns as
to the crop of 1890, Bulletin No. 10 of the Italian Ministry of Agriculture shows thiit
the largest crop during the seven years, other than that of 1890, was that of 1887, which
gave the out-turn of 119,500,000 bushels, or 9,500,000 bushels less than the Price Current's
largest crop, as that of 1890 was 2,360,000 bushels less; liut the most singular thing about
the Price Current's statements as to Italian wheat production is found in the fact that in
its issue of July 23rd it places the average yearly production of wheat in Italy at 135,000,-
000 bushels, being 6,000,000 bushels more than it states the greatest crop to have been. la
not the Price Current the only party that can make an average greater than the greatest
number of the series going t<> make up such average?

When the Price Current jniblished these astounding figures the official data rela
ting to Italian crops, had long l>een available in the publications of the United States
Department of Agriculture. And this so readily available data, and no doubt in the p ■-
session o' the Price Current in the reports of the Department for April and June. 1891,
shows that the average yield of the wh^at fields of Italy during the last seven vears to
have been 113,480,000 bushels instead of the 135 000,000 stated by the Price Current.

74

THE VALUE OF A TRADE JOURNAL'S DATA.

The July 23d Price Current places the average production of wheat in Spain at
110,000,000 bushels while the data published liy the Department of Agriculture, and
which accords with that collated by tlie writer, malies the Spanish average 92 000,000
bushels for the decade and 87,779,000 bushels for the last seven years, the mean being
some 20.000,000 bushels less than the Price Current's figures.

The Price Current makes the largest Spanish crop of the seven years 131.000,000
bushels while the official data shows it to Iiave been but 113,500,000 bushels — a diflference
of 16,500,000 bushels — a mere trifle for this journal.

So carefully is the Price Current edited that in its issue of July 23d it states the
average wheat crop of Hungary to be 125,000 000 bushels, and in the issue of July 9th it
states the greatest Hungarian crop of the seven years to have been 165,000,000 bushels
and the smallest to have been 194,000,000. Probably the Price Current is the flrst to make
the discovery that 165 is more than 194, as it is probably the first to discover that a crop
of 92,700,000 bushels can, by the use of an agile pen, lie transposed into one of 194,000,000.

In the Price Current at July 23d the annual average production of wheat in Hun-
gary is stated to be 40,000,000 bushels, and the smallest crop in the last seven years to
have been 37,000 000 bushels, when the official reports show the average for the decade to
have been 43,670,000 bushels, as they show the average during the last seven years to have
been 46,000,000, while the smallest crop in seven is otRcially placed at 38,376,000 bushels;
but then a matter of 1,375,000 bushels is of no consequence, especially when to be more
exact necessitates reference to readily available official publications.

In the Price Current's issue of July 9th the smallest crop of the last seven, in Ger-
many, is placed at 82,000 000 bushels, while official data readily available when such pub-
lication was made, shows that the smallest German crop, since 1SS3, gave an out-turn of "
87,170,000, a difference of 5,170,000 bushels.

In the Price Current for July 23d it is in one place stated that the product of wheat
in India, in 1891, was 255,435,000 bushels, while lower down in the same column the crop
of 1890-91 is placed at an even 235,000,000, the difference being no les-s than 20,435,000. It
is, however, but due to the Price Cm-rent to state that it now claims that the 235,000,000
bushel statement relates to the crop harvested in 1890, but such is not the reading of the
statement in the issue of July 23d, and that such claim is an afterthought is made highly
probable by the fact that in its issue of October 23d, 1890 it stated tlie product of the
Indian harvest for that year at 225,000.000 bushels, being 10,000,000 bushels less than the
out-turn it now sets up the claim that such crop gave. Takin.s; cue horn of the dilemma
there is an unexplained discrepancy in i(s statement of 20,435,000 bushels, while pendant
from the other horn hangs a trifle of 10,000,000.

More than this; in its issue of July 23d there is tabulated the product of seven recent
Indian wheat harvests, but the quantities of but two accord, even remotely, with the offi-
cial figures thrice stated in (three of) the monthly reports of the Department of Agri-
culture.

In its issue of the 27th of August, the Price Current places the annual consumption of
wheat and rye in France at about 405,000,000 bushels, while official data, available months,
and part of it years, before such publication was made, shows that the production and net
importation of wheat and rye — including a mi.\ture of wheat and rye known as maslin —
from 1887 to 1889, inclusive, to have been as follows:

Yeaks.

Production,
Bushels.

Net Iinporlaliun
Bushels.

Total Supply,
Bushels.

1887-88

400,801,000
355,579,000
385,920.000

28,416,000
47,70.S.000
28,752,000

429 217 OCO

1888-89

1889-90

403,347.000
414 1)70 000

Totals

1,142.300,000

]04,9H6 000

1 ■■'47 "34 000

Averages

380,766,000

34.979 OHO

415,745 000

It would appear that the Price Curren/ understates the annual consumption of wheat
and rye in France no less than 10,745,000 bushels, and this is made still more clear upc d

THE VALUE OF A TRADE JOURNAL'S DATA. 75

an examiimtion of the reports of the U. 8. Departmentof Agriculture for December, 1883^
where it is sliown that the consumption of wiieat aud rye (inoluclin;,' mixtures of the two
grains) for bread, .'■ted iiud use in tlie arts during tlie ten years followiiifj the I"'rani")-(}er-
man war — when the population was fully a million less than now — averaged 40(i, 1)00,000
bushels per year, being at the rale of 10.97 bushels per capita, while during the years
tabulated above the per capita quota, for all purposes, has been 10.92 bushels. The quan-
tity consumed is found to be a very constant one.

In the issue of the Price Current now under review it is stated that the United King-
dom will, during this cereal year, require to import 137,000,000 bushels of wheat, while
the imports of the last four years are oflicially shown to have averaged more than 151,-
000,000 bushels, and the British grain trade journals estimate the imports at from
162,000,000 to 165,000,000 bushels.

Moreover, the Price Current states the present annual consumption of Britain at
about 210,000,000 bushels, when the production aud net importation of wheat alone, during
the last four years arc found, from official reports, to have averaged more than 227,000,000
bushels (and about 2.500,000 bushels of rye) sliowing tliat the annual supply has exceeded
the Price Current's statement by fully 17,000.000 bushels. At the time this reckless, mis-
leading aud wholly incorrect statement wiis sent out the ofticial data, both as to jnoduc-
tiou and importatiini, had long been readily available, showing the facts to be entirely at
variance with Price Current utterances.

Every issue of the Price Current that the writer has examined carefully has been filled
with errors of like character, but space permits but a small fraction to be enumerated,
aud the statement of one or two more must suffice.

In its issue of July 23d the Price Current states the annual average production of
rye in Eoumania to be 40,000,000 bushels and that of Italy to be 15,000,000. In its latest
official out-givings the Roumanian government shows the rye acreage to be less than
430,000 acres and to produce 40,000,000 on such an area the yield must exceed 81 bushels
per acre, aud to produce crops averaging 15,000,000 bushels the rye fields of Italy must
yield more than 38 bushels per acre.

Aside from the improbability of such yields when the Price Current sent forth such
preposterous statements there was available, in the June report of the United States
Department of Agriculture, the official report of the Italian Ministry showing that from
1884 to 1889, inclusive, the crops of rye had averaged but 4,084,000 bushels, while the July
report of tho Department, likewise available when this absurd publication was made,
shows the yield of rye in Roumauia in 1889 to have been 10,305.000 bushels.

When the attention of the Price Current was called to these very wide discrepan-
cies, and it was asked to name its authority for such statements, the editor wrote:

"I do not find the data on which the compilation you refer to was based, as to Rou-
mania, but I think this item was obtained from Beerbohm, while the figures for Italy /
think were from a compilation which I published four or five years ago, from sources tljen
deemed authentic, as an indication of average production jyrevioun to that time. I pre-
sume I may soon find this material aud if it is difl'ereiit, especially with lefereuce to
Roumauia, I will address you again."

This is an astounding confession coming, as it does, from the editor of a journal
that poses as an authority upon so grave a suiject as food production and consumption —
a subject that involves the well being of nearly every man, woman and child in America.
At best the Price Current is convicted, out of its own mouth, of imposing upon the public
so-called data that has had no revision for years, for which it is unable to name any
authority and, this too, when an abuudance of official data was readily available.

It seems that the Price Current does not know where its figures came from, ho-y they
originated, and it has been shown that they not only vary from week to week but in the
3ame issue and column.

Is not this one of the most bare-faced frauds that was ever perpetrated upon confid-
ing patrons who are paying for this sort of stufl' and relying' upon it for ihe direction of
their business?

Th" investigations of the writer show that much, if not all, the so-called data of
this sheet is of this character, and the evidence furnished by the editor's confession.

76 THE VALUE OF A TRADE JOURNAL'S DATA.

shows that instead of being derived, as it all sliould be, from available official sources the
data used by the Price Current is raked from the gutter, takeu from the scrap-heap or selected
from the waste-basket.

Reading the Price Current in the bright light thrown upon it by this partial analysis
of its statements and nieihods, and having such knowledge of tlie character of its so-called
•data as we thus obtain, tlie question at once presents itself:

What does this sheet now desire to prove? By whom and in what interest is it
retained, and what is the amount of the retainer? Or is its mendacity and utter disre-
gard of connnou honesty, in its dealings with its jxitrons, the logical result of infinite
capacity foi' error and lack of ability?

Of what value are its deductions when the entire basis of the fabric is a matter of
reckless guess work and fabrication?

EUROPEAN REQUIREMENTS AND PROBABLE SUPPLIES OF RYE
AND WHEAT DURING THE 1891-92 CEREAL YEAR.

Requirements for bread 2,400,000,000 bushels

Itequiremeuts for seed 300,000,000 "

Total requirements 2,700,000,000 "

Probable cut-turn of European fields ..1,800,000,000 bushels

Si'ed required— a constant quantity 300 000,000 "

Seven and one-half montlis' food supply 1,500 000,000 " 1,800,000 000 "

Deficit equal to 4J months' food supply... 900,000,000 "
America. India and all other countries can sup-
ply at outside 280,000,000 "

Ultimate European deficit equal to three

mouths' needs 620,000,000 "

Potatoes and other substitutions may— possibly— be equal to half of one month's
consumption, but tliis is not probable, as the potatoes are always consumed in addition to
the wheat and rye; but admitting that such substitutions will equal half a mouth's con-
sumption, how are me other , two and a half months to be covered?

-i»e^-

In Central Russia tliere are IS provinces which the KiefT correspondent of (he Liv-
erpool Corn IVade News, for whose reliability the editor vouches in the strongest terms,
after careful personal inspection, says have not harvested as much grain as was sown.
These 18 provinces contain 39,000,000 inhabitants, and are not only the most populous
but the most productive of the whole Empire, and largely constitute its granary. If
these provinces have not grown the seed sown liow are they to be fed? The remainder
of the Umpire does not ■produce a xvrplus equal to the food requirements of 39,000,000
people.

With Europe producing but seven and a half months' food and the outside world
able to furnish but one and a hull' months' supply, would it not be good business policy
for American farmers to

"HOLD THE WHEAT?"

GAMBLING IN FOOD PRODUCTS.

It may be true, as Mr. B. P. Hutchinson says iu the North American Review for
October, that all operations iu the grains benefit the producer, but if he means, as would
appear from the context, that such operations as constitute ninety-nine per cent, of the
transactions upon the Boards of Trade then issue will be taken with this sweeping asser-
tion by i vast number of conservative people aside from the producers, who aje, prac-
tically, a unit in the belief that harm, and harm only, can result from such operations
whether they temporarily advance or depress prices.

We are told that but for this form of speculation:

"The farmer could only sell his grain to local buyers, who would be liable to get
full and stop buying, and then the farmer would be compelled to wait for customers; and
in the meantime a mortgage might be foreclosed on his farm, even while the wheat in his
bins would more than satisfy the mortgage if converted into cash."

The farmer objects not to speculation so much as to that sort of speculation of
which Mr. Hutchinson might be termed "an instructive example."

The farmer does not, and probably never has, objected to that speculation which,
when more grain was being marketed by the grower than was required by the consumer,
impels the buying of grain as an investment, places it in a warehouse to await that time
so sure to come when the volume of products being marketed by the grower shall be in-
sufticientto meet current requirements, the result being, in the abseuce of the short-seller,
such an advance in its value as to render the investment a remunerative one.

Prior to the evolution of the short-seller such speculative buying took the surplus
grain which the farmer desired to sell and stored it for the consumer, a reasonable charge
being made for the laudable service.

This may be termed speculation, but it is, as well, legitimate commerce, and is
wholly different from that speculation which finds its province in the buying and selling
of "options" and "puts and calls." The trouble with Jlr. Hutchinson and the class which
he represents is that they have no conception of commercial ethics and confound gam-
bling with speculation and commerce, desiring us to believe that gambling is both moral
and commendable, as well as necessary to the welfare of the comnmnity, and especially
to that of the farmer, whom they represent as likely to fall into irretrievable ruin but for
the kindly offices of the Board of Trade gambler, who puts prices up or down at will, and
at times — as just after the Hutchinson wheat corner of 1888 — renders it impossible to sell
grain, in the country, at any price.

This fraternity is most solicitous lest the farmer shall be unable to sell bis wheat
and pay ofl' a mortgage that otherwise might be foreclosed, but they seem to forget the
Old saying so long current, "good as wheat," and that in no part of the United States is
it a very difficult matter to borrow money on wheat in the farm granary and that the one
farmer in danger of having bis farm sold under foreclosure is that one who has no wheat
or but an unsufflcient amount, in his granary.

It is possible that the farmer may have to wait for customers, but certainly not
long while men continue to eat, and the speculator, be be of the laudable kind or of the
short-selling variety, does not add anything to the numlier of consumers or hasten the
consumption of the farmer's wheat by one minute, nor is it within his power to lessen
the consumption, although the short-seller can, and doubtless does, lessen the price
which the farmer receives by placing in competition quantities of flat products which
areas illimitable as are his greed and lack of commercial honesty.

Although the writer has probably not seen as many years as the advocate of gam-
bling in food products, yet he has bought and sold much grain and has never seen a time
— except at the end of some such gambling operation as that of September, 1888, upon
which Mr. Hutchinson delights to expatiate — when grain was not readily salable, and
prior to the time when modern methods of short-selling and running corners came into
vogue prices were far more stable and fluctuations less destructive of legitimate profits.
Until mankind is able to live without food the farmer will have a market for all he can
produce, and instead of hereafter waiting for customers all the coming years are likely to
see the consumer hurrying up the farmer and trying to hasten the marketing ot crops
that will rarely reach to the end of the harvest year.

78 GAMBLING IN FOOD PRODUCTS.

Probably few men know better tbau Mr. Hutchiusou that up to tlie time when
short-selling became the means of determining prices the warehouses were filled with
grain bought as an investment whereas now these warehouses stand less than one-third
full the year through the capitalist being afraid to invest money in property the value of
which may be so greatly lessened in a day, by the limitless offers of the short-seller, as to
entail loss.

Thus has that kind of speculation, which is at best but the worst form of gambling,
destroyed that laudable speculation which made a market for the products of the farm
before they were needed by the consumer. Not only did this beueficient form of specula-
tion go on at the trade centers but at every railway station and mill in the country ali-
sorbing and taking out of sight an enormous aggregate of farm products. Now, however,
instead of buying grain to store the miller buys an "option" and if the price goes up col-
lects tlie difference from the short-seller and goes into the market and buys the grain the
day he desires to grind it his profit being found in the saving of waste, insurance, inter-
est and storage room all of which accrue to the benefit of the miller or short-seller. In
other words: in consideration of the deposit of a small margin by the miller the short-
seller furnishes a vest-pocket elevator, insurance company, bank accomodations and a
guarantee against waste — all of which operates against the farmer who must carry the
grain and in ease he requires money, while the price is lower than he believes it ought
to be and will be, he must borrow from the banker.

While the short-selling speculator thus deprives him of the purch.iser, for distant
use, that he formerly enjoyed it is not the worst phase of the comijetitiou of the short,
seller as the grain which the miller and investment buyer formerly took from off the
market, and stored until needed for consumption, now all presses with fearful weight
upon a market that is also loaded down by the daily offering of hundreds, and some"
times thousands of millions of fiat products.

The amount of grain required for current consumption is a constant quantity ami
more being offered than is required will necessarily depress the price, be it actual grain or
simply the promises of the short-seller to deliver at some future day, and the volume of
such offerings necessarily determines the price. If less than the current requirements
prices are advanced by the buyer who has failed to secure the quantity his customers de-
mand, while on the contrary if the quantity offered is largely in excess of current needs
and there are no investing buyers of actual grain the price recedes. The world's yearly
requirements of wheat and rye now approximate closely to 3,600,000,000 bushels, and,
excluding Sundays and holidays, this implies daily needs of 12,000,000 bushels; hence we
may assumfe that If the offerings for any considerable period exceed the sum of the daily
requirements the efl'ect will be to lessen prices, and so long as the offerings continue to be
greater than the consumption so long will the tendency of prices be downward and no
advance in price can be expected, uo matter what the probabilities as to the future supply
may be, until the pinch of scarcity shows that the offerings of the short-seller are but
emanations from the lungs of a horde of unprincipled gamblers. So long, however, as
the actual deliveries of the farmer exceed or equal the world's requirements and these
offerings of flat products continue and there are no investment buyers of the farmer's
surplus there can be no permanent advance.

It goes without saying that so long as these conditions obtain and so long as more
flat grain is offered upon the markets of the world, by these industrious producers of
"promises to deliver," so long must the farmer expect low pi'ices, and instead of being a
benefit to the producer this kind of speculation— which has certainly slaughtered all in-
vestment buying of grain — is the greatest curse that could be inflicted upon any com-
munity by a horde of gamblers who are under the protection of the law, and who plume
themselves upon their ability to run wheat up to two dollars a bushel; advance the price
of the loaf and make the "other fellow" settle his bets at a price which the successfu'
worker of the corner fixes at twice the sum the farmer receives lor the product of the
fields upon which his labor has been expended and in which he has invested a vast cap-
ital.

When a successful corner has been made possible because there happens to be but

GAMBLING IN FOOD PRODUCTS. 79

3,330,000 bushels of the "contract grade" of wheat that could be got to market within the
month — September 1888 — (although the country was full of wheat of lower grade thut
would miike good bread) the worker of the corner, by paying two dollars u buehe'
for one or more car-loads of the contract grade, fixes the price at which be will settle
with those who are "short to him" — mind you the last thing that he desires is that thay
shall be able to deliver the grain which he has contracted to receive yet never expected or
iutended to receive, and had the "shorts" been able to have delivered a few hundred
thousand bushels more no doubt the corner would have been broken and the cornerer
bankrupted instead of the shorts, although lie might still have plumed himself with hav-
ing advanced the price of the loaf of which, however, there is no proof.

Expatiating upon the benefits of this kind of speculation to the producer Mr.
Hutchinson neglects to inform the reader that immediately he had settled with the
"shorts" upon their contracts, to deliver grain, that would certainly have ruined him if
complied with, the price of wheat dropped back to about what it was when he started to
work the corner and that many of the short sellers had beeustripped, by such sfitlement,
as bare as when they came into the world, and the business of the country h . . inen dis-
turbed that one man might have "gain without merit."

Is it not illogical to say that when wheat is too cheap the selling of "options" and
'•puts and calls" aids the producer and in the next breath tell us that:

"Grain operations benefit the consumer also; because when there is an excess of
bread-stuffs, a low price stimulates consumption and gives a big loaf and when there is a
deficit a high price enforces economy and teaches him to eat more potatoes and esculent
roots and less bread and thus give his neighbor a chance at the loaf?"

It is somewhat difficult to understand how speculation can add to one's appetite
and stimulate consumption. Is it a fact, that here, where all but those in extreme indi-
gence are always fully fed, that a low price stimulates consumption of the cheapest form
of food? Have not our people at all times all tlie bread they are able to consume? Is it
not known to every school boy that bread is, by far, the cheapest form of food when nu-
tritive properties are considered?

While we were long since told that "man shall not live by bread alone" it still re-
mains the one constant factor in the diet of the bread-eating people and being the cheuj"
est form in which the masses can readily obtain the required nutriment is the last to be
dispensed with, and the quantity eaten is lessened in but a slight degree by an advance
in price. When flour was selling at $15 per barrel, during the Crimean w 'r. there is no
evidence that consumption was malerially lessened either in this country or Western
Europe.

Few will question the benefits derived from the use of capital in dealing with food
products, but it is not the capital of the pernicious short-seller which performs the laud-
able service of distribution. •

While nothing could be more remote from the desire of the writer than to belittle
the services of capital actually employed in distribution, it is his desire to call attention
to the fact that what is known as the visible supply of grain, during the last ten years
has averaged under 30,000,000 bushels of wheat, less than 10,000,000 bushels of corn and
some .5,000,000 bushels of oats, with small quantities of rye and barley, all aggregating
some 4(5,000,000 bushels and worth less than $40,000,000 and it is quite safe to say that
adding the value of all the crude food and fiber products in transit, in mill, warehouse
and factory, as well as the value of the plants used In their distribution, the entire sum
would at no time exceed $.500,000,000. On the other hand the farmer, who is never
thought of us a capitalist, has invested in his land and its equipment for production a
sum that probably exceeds §16,000,000,000 and as he carries an average of half the year's
crop for the entire p riod his further investment is over $700,000,000 and in this form
alone greatly exceeds the entire investment of all those directly engaged in the distribu-
tion of his products.

I trust that the short-.selling gamblers of the Boards of Trade will pardon the sug-
gestion that the farmer could get on much better without their aid than can the real cap-
italist, engaged in distribution, get on without the farmer, who is not called upon to be

80 GAMBLING IN FOOD PRODUCTS.

specially grateful for the use of such sums as the distributors use in the furtherance of
their business.

Would it not be well if other members of the coummunity should recognize the
'act that the farmer employes a vast capital in his business? Would it not also be well
if the fact was more generally recognized that when the capital of the farmer is unprofit-
ably employed, by reason of inadequate prices for his products, every interest suffers and
stagnation pervades the economic fabric?

It is beyond controversy that the prosperity of the nation, as a whole, waits upon
the prosperity of that forty per cent., more or less, that inhabits the farm. Yet, there
seems a tacit combination of others to prevent the farmer from getting such a price for
his products as their cost and supply and demand now .justify and when it appears that
the farmer is likely to secure such a return as will afford him something more than the
meager subsistence which has, of late, been his only reward, the grain gambler, the
transporter, merchant and banker rush into print and tell us that if we insist upon such
prices as will aflnrd a fair return for the services of the farmer we shall scare away the
starving customer from Europe who can find supplies no where else on earth and others
will take possession of markets that we alone have the means of supplying. So great
is the solicitude lest the farmer shall secure something near what the worker of the wheat
corner, of September, 1888, was able to squeeze out of the "shorts", as the value of the
bushel of wheat which ihey failed to deliver upon their gambling contracts, that there is
held up to our horrified gaze the poor Russian who is likely to loose his hold upon the
markets of Western Europe because the Tzar has found it necessary to prohibit the ex-
portation of rye lest the 50,000,000 people inhabiting the stricken provinces should perish.

Another "bugaboo" which the venerable dealer in "puts and calls" holds up to
frighten the farmer from ruining the export market by insisting upon the fair price for
his products which the scant supply warrants is that the Scandinavian peasant, whom
we are told now eats bread made from half tree bark and half flour, will add another
twenty-flve per cent, of this most nutritious substance and deprive the American wheat-
grower of a market ! Since when have Swedes, Norwegians and Danes taken to a bark
diet? What is its nutritive value? What is the tree which furnishes this edible sub-
stance? Does it produce annual crops of edible bark and will it thrive in America?

Does n')t our speculative friend know that while Scandinavia yearly imports
some 2,500,000 bushels of wheat and about 12,000,000 bushels of rye that Scandinavian ex-
ports of other cereals exceed such quantities by some 6,000,000 bushels?

Does it not approach the ridiculous to even suggest that the Tzar hazards the mar-
ket for Russian grain in trying to save the lives of his starving subjects by retaining a
crop of rye that, added to all the wheat that has been harvested, is officially found to be
less than the ordinary requirements of the Russian people by more than a hundred
million bushels?

The essayist informs us that he "has studied this subject — presumably that of the
world's food supply, as well as short-selling— closely and for a long time." He has cer-
tainly studied it to little purpose if he has not learned that with average crops upon so
much of its surface as the world has thus far been able to devote to the production of rye
and wheat that the annual product is now less than the world's annual requirements by
hundreds of millions of bushels and that the annual deficit is increasing at the rate of
more than 30,000,000 bushels per year, and that the reason the pinch of scarcity has not
sooner been felt was to be found in the existence of great reserves heaped up in the years,
])rior to 1886, when the world's wheat area (and production) was in excess of current
lequirements.

Is it possible that the essayist is ignorant of the fact that while the bread-eaters of the
world have, since 1885, increased fully 38,000,000 and the requirements of wheat and rye
augmented by more than 230,000,000 bushels— equal to the product of more than 19,000,000
average acres — the wheat and rye acreage of the world has increased barely 2,000,000 acres
and but for the drafts which the world was able to make upon reserve stores the bread-
eaters of many lands would long since have known the pinching scarcity which implies
high prices?

GAMBLING IN FOOD PRODUCTS. 81

It would appear impossible that after such long aud close study the essayist should
oe ignorant of the fact that during the ninth decade the wheat and rye area of the world
increased but 14 percent, as against an increase in the wheat and rye eating population
of no less than 14 per cent.

Because the people of America have not been called upon to sup])ly any consider-
able part of the rye required by the people of Europe the short-selling fraternity either
forget or are ignorant of the fact that when rye is scarce wheat nii:st very largely take its
place, and that the scarcity of one necessarily affects the demand ami price for tlie other.
as they seem to be ignorant of the fact that in dealing with the world's supply of bread-
stuffs they must be treated as one in order to measure the world's needs with any degree
jf accuracy.

While the essayist tells us that in consequence of the Tzar's proclamation Russia is
likely to "have an unsold surplus and have lost valuable customers." does he not know
that a famishing man will not put seed in the ground that he needs to prevent immediate
starvation, and that such is to-day the condition of a great part of Russia, and that
the press is now teeming with the information that the sowings, in the famiue stricken
provinces, are thus being greatly curtailed, as I said they were likely to be as long ago as
oarly in June?

There are those who anticipate a greatly reduced out-turn from Russian fields dur-
ing the near by years as the result of the present dearth of seed, the loss of great numbens
iif work animals, and the starvation or dispersion of no inconsiderable number of the
cultivators.

If such anticipations are realized only in part it will be years before Russia need
mourn the lo.ss of customers, whose places, however, are likely to be taken by those whom
we now supply, but which Mr. Hutchinson agrees with me in saying must give place to
■'the immense population that will occupy, before many years, the territory between the
Mississippi and the Atlantic."

To convince us that we should let the short-seller determine the price for our prod-
ucts in such u way as not to scare away our customers we are told that:

•'We might if excessively greedy for money, drive the consumers to using substi-
tutes, and that would i)e bad for both sides. In the interior of Cuba, San Domingo and
Brazil the poorer classes never see bread at all."

While this is doubtless very interesting and instructive, it is difficult to see what is
the value, as customers of the wheat grower, of people who never see bread, and it seems
quite safe to say, judging from what we know of periods of scarcity in the past, that so
long as people can secure the means of purchase they will continue to eat bread, as did
the people of Britain in 1801 when wheat sold for $5.40 per bushel, aud when, as during
the first twenty years of this century, the English loaf was made from wheat that cost,
on an average of $2.60 per bushel, the price of the quartern loaf once rising to forty-seven
cents although it has recently sold for less than ten cents while wages, of the English ar-
tisan and laborer, are now much higher than in the earlier decades of the century.

Even when wheat was selling at $5.40 per bushel the poor would not substitute the
Indian rice upon which, as a measure of relief, the government had thrown away a
Ijounty, to induce importation, of no less than $1,700,000 prefering to buy the high
priced wheat.

By the way, does it not appear a little singular that Mr Hutchinson did u< t dis-
cover when he put wheat iip to two dollars a bushel in 1888 that "it would be bad for
both sides"? That, however, being mostly wind wheat, he probably felt justified in
acting upon the theory that as it could not be eaten the consumer would not be attected
although he likes to say that it did enhance the price of the poor man's loaf.

The history of the entire past shows quite conclusively that the last thing to Ije dis-
pensed with is bread. If an economy in food becomes necessary such articles of diet as
are either less nutritive or more costly will first be dispensed with and it may not be
amiss to remind the short-sellers that when the necessity for substitution arises the sub-
stitutes are usually not obtainable in suflicient volume to afl'ord much relief and the very
fact of the substitution of a less desirable article tor one to which the consumer has al-

82 GAMBLING IN FOOD PRODUCTS.

ways been accustomed and for which he has a great preference implies quite as high pri-
ces as the producer of the scarce article is likely to desire.

When the crops of wheat and rye are greatly deficient it is not unusual for the oth-
er crops to be meager and those who talk so glibly of substitutions seems to have lost
sight of tlie fact that such things as potatoes, other grains, and all possible substitutes but
tree barb, are rarely produced in excess of current needs and are all consumed in addition
to the wheat and rye even in years of average yield of all food crops. This year of defic-
ient production of rye and wheat proves to be no exception in this respect, as in the
devastated districts of Russia other crops are nearly or quite as deficient as those of the
bread-making grains, and the potato crop is as complete a failure as it is possible for
mind to conceive, while that of hay is little if any better, and the pastures have been
sere and brown the year through, the result being that the farmer can neither sell nor
feed his animals, as no one has forage.

That potatoes cannot, this year, be substituted for the deficient grains, over the
most of Central and Western Europe, is made certain by the character ♦f a potato crop
which is nowhere above an average and over vast areas is greatly below rendering it clear
that the quantity harvested will be below the amount ordinarily consumed and indicat-
ing the desirability of even finding some substitute, other than tree bark, for the deficient
potatoes.

In Europe, as a whole, other roots are a deficient crop, and this is especially true
of wide areas in Britain, while there is fear of great distress in Ireland because of potato
blight.

In France a lai'ge part of the frost-ravaged wheat fields were resown to oats, the
crop of which is some 1.5 per cent, above the average, and in France oats are not unlikely
to be substituted, in part, for wheat and rye, both of which are greatly deficient in quan-
tity and even more so as to quality, some recent estimates putting the wheat fit for mill-
ing as low as 50 per cent, of a yield estimated to aggregate not more than 64 per cent, of
an average, while in no case is the grain up to the standard in either weight or nutritive
power.

Thomas Tooke, in his work on prices, lays it down as an axiom that "a very small
deficiency in the case of necessaries will cause a very great increase in the price: e. g.^
that wheat may rise from 100 to 300 per cent, when the deficiency in the crops is not
more than 15 or 30."

The writer estimates the wheat and rye crops of the world, just harvested, to be
from 18 to 20 per cent, below an average, and by reason of an acreage deficient for some
years the aggregate product to be 20 per cent, below the world's requirements. The
reader can readily make the application of Tooke's law.

Mr. Hutchinson tells us we supply Europe because we have a new soil, plenty of
acres and use implements that cheapen production, and that a dollar a bushel for wheat
at Minneapolis means a great deal for such a farmer as Oliver Dalrymple who is repre"
sented as saying "that his wheat cost him about thirty cents a bushel with a good yield."

How many farmers are there in the world who grow wheat under as favorable con-
ditions as Mr. Dalrymple? Does not even two per cent, on all their investments mean
much to such capitalists as a Vanderbilt or an Astor while meaning very little to the
widow whose whole fortune is but five thousand dollars?

Mr. Hutchinson forgets to tell us how often Mr. Dalrymple secures the "good
yield" which enables him to produce wheat at about thirty cents a bushel, but the inten-
tion seems to be that the impression should go abroad that to produce wheat upon o>ir
western farms it costs but thirty cents per bushel, and that a dollar for it at the great
markets means that the farmer will roll in wealth and vie with the railroad magnate in
his expenditures, hence the insistence upon a fair price for his grain is all wrong.

While it is within the possible that some of Mr. Dalrymple's crops may have been
produced at a cost as low as thirty cents, yet I venture the suggestion that such sum does
not begin to represent the average cost of the crops he has grown during the last five
years, as I know that twice that sum does not begin to cover the cost of growing wheat
upon lands, that even in this new country, require considerable expenditures for fertili-

GAMBLING IN FOOD PRODUCTS. 88

zatiou, aud it is both unjust to tile farmer, aud misleading, to put forward such a state-
ment, as the cost of production, which it is quite safe to assume, averages mucli nearer a
(lolliir aud still leaves little as a return for the capital invested.

Were it otherwise, would not western farmers be more prosperous, and would ho
many of the farms be subject to foreclosure were the sliort-seller to be prevented from
making a market for wheat ?

If wheat could be profitably grown at twice thirty cents it is safe to say that but
few farms would be in danger of being sold under foreclosure. The low price of wheat —
wheat being the key to the aggricultural situation — no matter how brought about, has
l>een the primary cause of the continued existence of American farm mortgages, as it has
lieeu of the bankruptcy of so many of the tenant farmers of Britain, and it is the effect of
short-selling to continue tliese low prices, when the conditions of supply warrant high
ones, that constitute the burthen of the farmer's objection to that form of speculation for
which Mr. Hutchinson appears as the advocate, aud which, in practice, assumes the
worst possible form of gambling, as the losses ultimately all fall upon the farmer who
takes no voluntary part in the game, is its most unwilling victim, and is never permitted
to share in the winnings.

We are told by Mr. Hutchinson that: "South America will have from the Argen-
tine Republic a surplus of perhaps 30,000,000 busliels."

Is it not strange that after such "long and close study" of this subject Mr. Hutuh
insou should so presume upon the credulity or ignorance of the public as to put fortli
such a statement when reference to the Consular report for April, 1890, page 610.
shows the exports of wheat from Argentina to have been 8,730,000 bushels in 1S87,
(1,560,000 bushels in 1888 and but 840,000 bushels in 1889, the aggregate for the three
years being Init little more than half that thirty million bushels that the public is now
fold we may expect from a crop that has yet to pass the critical period of its growth and
which covers but about 3,000,000 acres? Was this statement, that is a third greater than
the entire exports of the last four years, put forward in ignorance or for the purpose of
misleading the public?

The whole short-selling fraternity constantly exagerate the extent of the crops and
the exjiortable surplus of the wheat growing countries and then base upon such exagger-
ations an argument for low prices, aud they are now engaged in sending abroad state-
ments that although we have exported 60,000,000 bushels from this crop we still have an
exportable surplus remaining of from 200,000,00(1 to 1^50,000,000 bushels and can supply all
the needs of Europe without difficulty aud shall have an unmarketable surplus left upon
our hands if we do not hurry our grain to market at a low price.

A favorite argument of the short-seller is that there is a harvest somewhere in the
world every month in the year, hence there can be no enduring scarcity. This is not
true so far as relates to commercial crops of the bread-making grains, and these instruct-
ors of the public neglect to tell us that the entire exportable surplus of wheat of the
southern hemisphere would barely furnish Europe with bread for three days, and that
the cultivated area of that hemisphere, outside the tropics, is less than that of the one
State of Illinois.

The short-seller makes the claim that his sales do not and cannot afTect the price
for farm products, as the seller implies the buyer. While this may be nominally true
where actual sales of even options are made there are an immense number of "wash-
sales" constantly being made for the purpose of breaking down prices that the short"
seller may buy in his outstanding contracts at a profit, and when the great short-sellers
enter into a combination, as they often do, to "bear" prices they usually eflTect their ob-
ject and the lower prices are hammered, and the less buying the greater are their offerim/s-
and it is these offeringt; that determines the price which the farmer is forced to accept for
his products, and thus is he most directly afiected by all these operations.

That these operations, while making the price for the products of the farm, are fic-
titious aud but gambling devices is made most clear by the fact that delivery of property
but in rare instances follows the making of these hundreds of thousands of contracts to
deliver. For instance, at the close of the September, 1801, deals, during which month thou-

84 GAMBLING IN FOOD PRODUCTS.

iands of millions of bushels of wheat and corn were contracted to be delivered at Chicago
by the short-siUers, the actual deliveries at the maturity of these contracts were less than
50,000 bushels of wheat and 35,000 bushels of corn, the other "deals" having been settled by
payment of the difference ivhich constituted the winnings of the fortunate gamblers.

Does uot Mr. Hutchinson know that when by such operations the price of wheat
lias been reduced to the extent of one cent a bushel it means much to farmers other than
Mr. Dalrymple, and that upon an average wheat crop it amounts to no less than a loss of
154,500,000 to the producer?

Mr. Hutchinson informs us that among the brightest of the great millers who have
placed Minneapolis at the head of the milling world is Mr. Charles A. Pillsburj', but he
is careful not to inform his readei's what are the opinions of this the greatest dealer in the
world in actual farm products as to the practice of short-selling, as set forth on pages 65
and 70 ante.

The Cincinnati Price Current says:

"Here is the evil — the sale of wind contracts, inflated by the margin system, hav-
ing the same power of influencing values that an equal offering of actual property would
have."

Mr. Denison B. Smith, Secretary of the Toledo Board of Trade, says:

"We most heartily deprecate the conditions prevailing in this country. First
is the apparent want of courage on the part of capitalists to invest in wheat, and the next
is the reckless disposition of the fraternity of short-sellers to pound down prices. Not an
advance in prices has occurred on this side that has not been reflected abroad, and not a
decline that has not been followed by a corresponding break over there."

The first of Mr. Smith's conditions is the inevitable corollary of the second, and
the capitalist will recover his courage and invest in wheat the moment the short-seller is
taxed out of existence.

This evil has now invaded the markets of Britain, and in the Liverpool correspond-
ence of Dornhusch of September 5th, 1891, it is stated that:

"Our local market is dominated bj' a crowd of dealers in 'options' and 'futures,'
putting prices up and down every ten minutes, and with a similar state of things in
America it is diflticult to know where we are."

About May 1st, Leopold Bloom retired from the Chicago wheat pit worth "a clean
million dollars" and was reported in the Chicago Tribune as giving his reasons for retir-
ing in the following language:

"It's too much of a strain on a man to stand for any length of time without wearing
out. One is under pressure all the time. He is betting his money against the market.
If he buys and she goes up he is a winner. If she goes down he is a loser. It's a plain
case of gamble, but it's legal and faro isn't. If they would take the limit ofl' faro it
would be a better game than wheat, because you could get quicker action but with the
limit on there i.^n't money enough in it."

Mr Bloom is much more frank in rightly characterising ihe game than are most of
its devotees who appear to be ashamed of its real character.

Shall twenty thousand short-sellers be longer permitted to bring the product of
their lungs (which costs nothing) into destructive competition with the useful and costly
products of the world's many millions of farms in which is invested more than $100,000-
000,000?

The conscience of the nation has decreed the suppression of the Louisiana lottery
that is far less immoral than short selling and inflicts harm only upon those voluntarily
becoming its victims.

Must the great industrial hosts of the farm suflTer that a mere squad (comparatively)
of worthless, short-selling gamblers may continue to bet upon prices and secure "gain
without merit?"

f-aHlVBESIT'

THE FOLLOWING TABLE

Shows the Average Annual Product of Rye and Wheat, the Estimated Requlre-
nnents, and the Out-turn promised by the harvest of 1891.

France

Russia, Poland and Finland

Austria-Hungary

Germany

Italy

Spain

United Kingdom

Roumania

Turicey, Bulgaria and Roumelia

Belgium

Netherlands

Switzerland

Portugal, Greece, Servia and Scandinavia

North America

South America

Australasia

India

Other Countries

World Totals^

Annual average
product of

Rye and Wheat
1881 to 1890

Requirements

of

Rye and Wheat

for the 1891-2

cereal year

385,000,000

960,000,000 j

282.000,000 I

313,000,000 1

122,000,000

121,000,000

81.000,000

46,000,000

51,000,000

38,000,000

18.000,000

8.000,000

76,000,000

502,000,000

31,000,000

35,000,000

253,000,000

120,000,000

Estimated

out-turn of

Rye and Wheat

harvest of

1891

3,442,000,000

416,000,000

800,000,000

266,000,000

377,000,000

150,000,000

130.000,000

236.000,000

30,000,000

44,000,000

66,000,000

36,000,000

21,000,000

106,000,000

426,000,000

40,000,000

32,000,000

226,000,000 I

130,000,000

3,534,000,000

274,000,000

590,000.000

250,000,000

242.000,000

120.000,000

104,000,000

70,000,000

46,000,000

61,000,000

26,000,000

16,000,000

7,000,000

70,000,000

591,000,000

44,000,000

39,000,000

255.000,000

120,000,000

2,916,000,000

An apparent world deficit of 18 per cent, or 619.000,000 bushels.
It should be remembered that rye forms thirty-eight per cent, of the two great bread-
making grains and that of the bread eaten in Europe it constitutes no less than forty-
seven per cent., and that in dealing with the requirements of the world, rye and wheat
can not be separated.

There can be no doubt ihat the London News is correct when it says that American
farmers are the masters of the situation, and can fix their own price for the great crop
now being harvested.

ERRATA.

Page 10— Second line from top should read "short of bread-stufls."

Page 17— At close of last line substitute for "in or" "or in other cases."

Page 19— First line should read "is likely to become."

Page 19— Third line of second paragraph should read "necessaries of life.'

Page 35 — Fourth line of third paragraph should read "great markets."

Page 35— Fourth and fifth paragraphs should be read as one.

Page 54— Fifth word of fourth paragraph is "cut."

'a

^ OTf TEi.

TO 22925