ust Balt H a puvwve ee the “nee _: Reference Library of PAUL IVES ALBERT R. MANN LIBRARY New York STATE COLLEGES OF AGRICULTURE AND Homg ECONOMICS AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY THE GIFT OF PAUL PomeERoy Ives 2p IN MEMORY OF PAUL Pomeroy Ivgs Date Due uuew vOl 086 200 pz6l € UNNI SNoJOUWNY y"s8A3} UBY dU) Jo Ar0;SIY auL “P2 Pz 964'7ePr 4S Aseiqi) Ayisuaaiun taus0 Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924002980104 Pamted by F, Winterhalter. 19. PN. G. Muiesip, Wietoria, Queen of Creat Writain, IN THE ROBES OF THE MOST NOBLE ORDER OF THE GARTER, DAGUERREOTYPED HY THOMPRON, Hrom the Portrait in possession of Geo. P. Burnham; PRESENTED TO HIM BY HER MAJESTY, THE QUEEN, IN 1853, [Sre Letter, page 130.) REV. F. D. HUNTINGTON’S FAST DAY SERMON REVIEWED. On Tuurspay, April 5th, 1855, on the occasion of the annual “ Fast’ appointed by the Governor of Massachu- setts, the Rev. F. D. Hunrrneron, Pastor of the Cgn- gregational Unitarian Society of Boston, for the text of his _discourse made choice of the following portion of, the twenty-second verse of the twelfth chapter of Proverbs: “ Lying lips are abomination to the Lord.” The audience present upon this occasion embraced a highly intelligent and goodly array of talent, and the listen- ers to the discourse which succeeded the announcement of . the above theme were attentive, and were more than ordi- narily interested during its delivery. The reverend gen- tleman divided his subject in form, and launched fotth, at length, upon the deceits of the present day, and the follies and foibles that are current in this “ progressive” age. On Friday, April 6th, the editor of the Boston Even- ing Transcript allowed one of its apparently friendly correspondents to furnish for that paper a nominally “brief”? description of this remarkably interesting sermon, in the course of which communication the writer stated * Lolnen See Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1855, by GEO. P. BURNHAM, in tho Clerk's Office a the District Court of the District of Massachusetts. ” . BP Seeathe 2 BBY. F. D. HUNTINGTON'S E 69% that “A large audience was present at Rev. Mr. Hunting- ton’s church -yesterday- morning, and listened with much pleasure to an exceedingly eloquent, forcible, and practical sermon on Lying, from the words, ‘ Lying lips are abomi- nation to the Lord.’ The writer then went on to say that “The reverend gentleman specified the different kinds of lying, as the ‘lie of cowardice,’ the ‘lie for amusement,’ the ‘lie of malice,’ the ‘lie of self-interest,’ &c. Under the last head he enlarged with great power and force, and in his remarks alluded to the recent publications of Barnum’s Life, and Burnham's Hen Fever. The last publication he thought ofsthe same character as the first-named, only much weaker and more vapid. The former’ Mr. H. pronounced “not only weak, but bad,” &. &e. The reverend speaker was then described as having taken the general ground that these books were immoral and dangerous, and he regretted to meet with them upon the centre-tables of all his friends, to know that they were everywhere read, and that they even found their” way into the hands of the youth. ‘Sooner than have his boy obtain wealth by such practices and such knavery as is in this sort of work presented as ‘shrewdness,’ he would rather he would live all his days in an almshouse, and be buried without a coffin.”* * The editor of the Transcript was subsequently appealed to, by the author of the book thus ridiculed in his columns, and a respectful letter upon the subject of his corfespondent’s statements was sent him in reply. But, as the Rev. Mr. Huntington chanced to be of sufficient consequence to be lauded in that respectable journal, ergo he was of too much conse- quence to be reproved by the injured party, at whose cost he had thus been complimented ! FAST DAY SERMON REVIEWED. 3 The reporter for the Transcript remarked, finally, that the Rev. Mr. Huntington ‘closed his sermon with an earnest appeal to his hearers to live and speak the truth at all times, and under all circumstances. To do this, the springs from within must be pure, and the heart must be consecrated to God. The sermon was listened to with great attention and pleasure; and we can only give a mere sketch of a few of its leading ideas,” &c. The above extracts contain the substance of the personal allusions made by the correspondent of the Transcript, who evidently intended to compliment the Reverend Mr. Huntington at the expense of the author of the ‘ History of the Hen Fever,’’ but who forgot the very recommenda- tions he had so zealously quoted on the subject of lying, out of “malice,” or for ‘‘amusement.” For, it subsequently turned out that Mr. Huntington did not use the language attributed to him by this very zealous, but clearly lying and very stupid correspondent of the Boston Evening Transcript ! A rumor became current, immediately, that the author of the “ History of the Hen Fever” had in some way contrived to influence the speaker thus to allude in his sermon to his new and popular publication, for purposes of self-interest; and Mr. Burnham felt constrained, in self- defence, on the Monday succeeding the delivery of this curious discourse, to issue the following card, which ap- peared in the Boston Daily Times of April 9th, 1855. A DENIAL. George P. Burnham, Esq., the successful author of the * History of the Hen Fever,” requests us to deny, un- 4 REY. F. D. HUNTINGTON’S. equivocally, the truth of the rumor that ha entered into any arrangement with Rev. Mr. Huntington, of this city, inducing that gentleman to refer, in his last “ Fast Day ” sermon, to his-popular book. The Hen Fever is selling’ at the rate of about one thousand daily, and the author has no occasion to resort to this kind of advertisement, at present.” The positions assumed and the language applied to the “ History of the Hen Fever” by Rev. Mr. H., were of.the most extraordinary character, however. His hearers plainly understood the points he made, and there was no mistaking the drift or the application of his remarks. This speaker is not, usually, nor did he on this special occasion aim to be, misunderstood or misappreciated. A two-fold response is readily suggested to the accusations preferred by the reverend gentleman in his Fast Day dis- course. The first point is, that, even admitting that the language which is employed in the ‘‘ History of the Hen Fever” is not exactly of that literal and ascetic cast which finds so much favor with dull and sober people, the facts are by no means the less authentic. The book in question is a record of facts, generally. The reverend critic assumes to think, notwithstanding, that, the “History of the Hen Fever’? is a work of fiction, and that its author invented. all that is therein stated to have occurred! If he be honest in this impression, he certainly compliments the writer’s imagination; but, really, at the expense of his veracity. -~ . FAST DAY SERMON REVIEWED. 5 In reply to the article which the editor of the Transcript permitted to be inserted in his columns, in the outset, over the signature ‘“B,” (but which Mr. Burnham did not write, although it was generally supposed to have originated with him !) the following respectful letter was addressed, by Mr. Burnham, to the editor of that paper —but which he declined to publish, although his columns had been first opened to a correspondent upon the subject, to hold up to ridicule the author of the book thus assailed. This letter was couched in fair and friendly terms, as follows; and was published in another daily of Tuesday. Epitor oF Evenine Transoript.— Dear Sir: In Friday’s Transcript you permitted a correspondent to give your readers an objectionable ‘brief sketch” of the Rev. Mr. Huntington’s ‘“‘able”’ Fast Day sermon, in the course of which that gentleman was pleased to assail my lately-pub- lished book, the ‘‘ History of the Hen Fever.”” Will you, in the same friendly spirit, allow the author of that volume, through your columns, to express his surprise that Mr. H. should have chosen ‘‘ Barnum’s and Burnham’s”’ books for his subject on that occasion; and to add that (while I can- not but think the reverend gentleman stepped aside from the course prescribed by his legitimate duties in thus wantonly attacking me) I regret that the Transcript should have been made the vehicle for republishing the offensive stand taken in the discourse alluded to. Iam not aware that I. ever crossed the path of Rev. Mr. Huntington, that he 1* 6 REY. F. D. HUNTINGTON’S., should thus attempt to injure me; and it occurs to me. that surely there were many “great” and graver matters that might have been selected for the text to his Fast Day ser- mon, without a resort to this. Respectfully yours, Gro. P. BuRNHAM. Melrose, April 9, 1855. , This communication was based upon the T’ranscript’s re- port; and, in the mean time, Mr. Burnham addressed to the Rev. Mr. Huntiveron, personally, the following letter, which was delivered to him at his residence in Roxbury, by a friend, on the afternoon of Monday, April 9th, and. which ran as follows : Russet House, Melrose, April Tth, 1855. F. D. Huntineton, Boston. : Rav. ‘Sir: I was greatly surprised that you should have had at your command (for your late ‘‘ Fast Day” sermon) a subject no more felicitous and appropriate for considera- tion in the pulpit than that which you selected for Thurs- day last; and in the course of which you seized upon the opportunity so uncharitably to attack my book and the author of the “ History of the Hen Fever.” Of fourse, you never read the work. But you condemn | it in round terms, thus publicly, from the “sacred desk,?” dnd,, «vith: an altogether mistaken zeal, you have been pleasedito characterize my, book as a compound of disclosed _ FAST DAY SERMON REVIEWED. 7 knavery, etc., while you contend that you would prefer that a son of yours should occupy an apartment “in the alms- house, and be buried without a coffin,” rather than he should succeed in life by means of selling live stock at fancy prices, etc. In so far as your own family or children are concerned, I have no possible objection to offer to this singularly avowed choice on your part. ButI have a right to object to your unchristian language at my expense, and I claim that you have no more right, socially, morally or religiously, thus to assail me in public, than you have to steal my watch, or to rob me of my purse. I tacitly permit mo man to abuse or to malign me, or mine, sir, without resenting it. I regret, exceedingly, the cause which prompts me to address a note of this character to a gentleman of your profession and position. But, when | you step out of your province, evidently to your neigh- bor’s injury, you cannot hope to escape censure. In all candor, permit me to ask in what manner I have ever crossed your path, sir, that you should thus do me personal wrong. My business, and my humble “record” thereof, did mot come legitimately within the range of your notice, in any way whatever. The volume you thus at- tacked is but a frank and simple exposé of a huge bubble, of which I (not you) had been long an unconscious vic- tim. The effect of my history of this mania will be to cripple and crush a delusion that-has hurt the community 8 REV. F. D. HUNTINGTON’S in past days; and thus good, not evil, will come from its publication, eventually. You area chosen minister of the Gospel, and in your official station you have committed an error in thus assail- ing private character. Your unkind and ill-chosen com- ments upon the publication of my book were most extraor- — dinary in sentiment and intent. I shall exert myself, in my own way, to counteract the effect you have sought to produce ; ‘and I trust that before you again make the pulpit your chosen place from which to hurl anathemas upon an humble and unoffending fellow-citizen, who never wrote one line ‘that, dying, he would wish to blot,” you will better weigh the probable effect of your words. The good Apostle advises those of your holy calling to use only “ sound speech, that cannot be condemned ;”’ and counsels us to “speak evil of no man, to be no brawl- ers, but,gentle, showing all meekness to a/J men.’”’? We are clearly bidden to “‘speak mo¢ evil of one another;” for ‘he that speaketh evil of his brother, and judgeth his brother, speaketh evil of the Law, and judgeth the Law.” Mr. Huntington, the pastor, “hath done me much evil; the Lord reward him according to his works.” With due respect, yours, Gzo. P. BURNHAM. P. 8. I respectfully ask your attention to the enclosed notices of my book (from certain religious and family FAST DAY SERMON REVIEWED. 9. papers), which seem to differ from you in opinion as to its merits.” In contradistinction to the opinion expressed by the talented “and reverend critic in his pulpit — as already quoted — the author experiences great pleasure in presenting, first, the following extracts in brief, which he selects from several scores of similar frank and fair criticisms, FROM CERTAIN RELIGIOUS JOURNALS. The JVestern Family Circle says, that ‘“‘ Burnham’s new volume is full of spice and wit, and is one of the most instructive and readable volumes that ever fell under our observation. We heartily commend it to general perusal; for none can be so stoical as to rise from a careful read- ing of this amusing book without feeling wiser in the ways of this world, as well as better and happier.” The Philadelphia Observer pronounces it ‘a very humorous record of a very singular delusion; ”’ and recom- mends its perusal to ‘‘all who can enjoy an innocent laugh over the explosion of a most unhealthy and curious bubble, © which the author has effectually destroyed.” The Boston Puritan Recorder states that ‘‘ this volume details an actual state of things, in regard to the whole hen tribe, as having existed in this country within the last few years. We may safely say that some of its details are, in point of genuine humor, quite irresistible.”’ The Buffalo Christian Advocate exclaims, ‘‘ Such a pre- sentation as we have in this volume, both in story and em- bellishment, the world has never seen before! Our ideas 10 REV. F. D. HUNTINGTON’S of henology have been vastly extended since reading it through.” The Philadelphia Evangelist denominates it “a book of infinite humor; ” and adds, that ‘‘the revelations which it makes are told with a spirit and extravagance that are irresistibly farcical. The author makes a book not without its valuable lesson.” The Boston Traveller says, ‘‘ The sale of this book has already been immense—amounting, in two weeks, to twenty thousand. It is a history of the fowl mania, and one good result the book may have —admonitory of all such ex- travagant follies.” The Christian Era says, ‘‘ We profess to know but little of the hen traffic, but the reader will find in ‘ Burnham’s History of the Hen ‘Fever’ a curious compound, made up of truth, sarcasm, irony, fun, etc. If people want to spend their money for the sake of having a good hearty laugh, they will do well to buy the Hen Fever.” The Philadelphia Presbyterian Banner states that ‘‘ Mr. Barnum’s book has been republished in England,” and adds, that ‘Mr. Burnham’s book will quickly find its way into the English market — it being a fit companion” for that curious volume. The Albany Family Register says, “This is a most instructive as well as entertaining book. There is genuine humor in it, and its perusal will make a world of people laugh, while it cannot fail of making all who are capable thereof wiser and better, and therefore richer.”’ The Claremont Christian Advocate says, ‘This book, with @ profusion of spice and fun that is truly exhilarating, FAST DAY SERMON REVIEWED. 11 shows up the hen delusion in most admirable style ; and we would invite all who like to indulge in the luxury of a hearty laugh to buy a copy. The illustrations are cap- ital.” The Portland Transcript says, Mr. Burnham ‘ writes this book to show the people how they have been hum- bugged; but, unlike Barnum, he makes no PEcKsNIF- FIAN professions of reform and manalipys Such books ought to prove of benefit to the public.” The Penn. Independent says, ‘‘ This volume, by Geo. P. Burnham, Esq., is a new and amusing work, for a copy of which we are under lasting obligations to the publishers. It will create a deep sensation, and be productive of a deal of good in the community.” The N. Y. Watchman denominates this work ‘a vol- ume by a master-hand;”’ and says, ‘‘ though we could wish that certain passages might have been omitted, yet, on the whole, it is a capital book, calculated to effect solid good throughout a community proverbially inclined to be de- ceived and cajoled.”’ The editor of Zion's Herald says, he “don’t like” this book, but announces that ‘‘it contains an account of the manner in which the public were duped by the tricks of interested men, during the prevalence of what is aptly enough called the ‘Hen Fever.” The author, who, it appears, made himself rick out of the ‘ bubble,’ hopes to increase his hoards by this publication.” Of no book yet put upon the American market has there ever been sold so many copies, in three weeks from 12 REV. F. D. HUNTINGTON'S the day of publication, as have been sold of this popular humorous work, and the demand still continues unabated. Out of over three hundred voluntary criticisms and notices of Burnham's ‘History of the Hen Fever,” but four have yet been seen that were not favorable, or lauda- tory of its merits. The religious press have given the work a warm ap- proval, generally ; and yet the Rev. Mr. Huntington, of Boston, attacked this popular book in his pulpit, and de- clared, in substance, that he was grieved and astonished to hear that it was read by all classes, found on all centre- tables, and placed in the hands of youth. Sooner than have his boy obtain wealth by such practices as were in that work presented as “shrewdness,” he ‘ would rather he would live all his’days in an almshouse, and be buried without a coffin.” 3 The author of the ‘History or THE Hen Fever” would ordinarily deem comment of his own unnecessary, after quoting the above opinions of the religious press, and of the Rev. Mr. Huntington in juxtaposition. But, as he feels that he has written but “a plain, unvarnished ”’ and truthful history of a generally unprofitable mania,— which record cannot but have the effect to open the eyes of hun- dreds and thousands to the ridiculousness of its details,— 80 he cannot tacitly submit to censure, without offering to the public the explanation that thus seems to be demanded, after the promulgation of the extraordinary strictures that have been uttered by the reverend gentleman who so earnestly and ruthlessly denounces this book from his pulpit. FAST DAY SERMON REVIEWED. 13 In reply to my letter of April 7th, already quoted, the Rev. Mr. Huntington addressed me the following communi- cation, a few days since. Highlands, Roxbury, April 9th, 1855. Geo. P. Burnuam, Eso, Russet House, Melrose. Dear Sir: Your note of the 7th inst. has just come to hand. ‘ You have been misinformed respecting the contents of my Fast Day sermon. There was nothing in that discourse, . Tam quite sure, inconsistent with the strictest justice, or the truest charity. It would give me unspeakable pain to believe that I had abused my place by wronging any man. Your informant must have got matters sadly jumbled to- gether. Ihave ‘‘done”’ you no “ evil” at all. My strictures on that occasion were aimed at the practice of imposing upon the public, or on individuals, by taking their money for articles which are pretended to be what they are not; against deceiving men in traffic or in specu- lation ; and against such books as encourage these sins. My language was applied to your work, because some hear- ers considered it as suited to that work. It is an instance of a third party’s ‘‘ putting on the coat’ because it fits ! A hearer, who is by me at this moment, for example, says she had no idea that any allusion was made to the “History of the Hen Fever.” I referred, in general terms, to ‘a work issued in this neighborhood,’ but made 9 14 REV. F. D. HUNTINGTON’S no mention of author, ¢itle,* or subject, pointing to you. I think your good sense, your good-nature, and, above. all, your conscience, will decide that you have no cause for feel- ing aggrieved. I do not estimate, as you appear to do, the proper func- tions of the pulpit; for I suppose it is, even more legiti- mately than the press, the appointed censor of every species of public immorality. And, to be frank with you, I do think your book (probably from neglect rather than inten- tion) represents the habit of selling goods under “false appearances and pretences as no worse, under certain cir- cumstances, than a joke! Now, your own heart will tell you, that, for a minister to rebuke this, boldly and sharply, is no more than a faithful exercise of his calling and his duty. T cannot help being amused at the use to which you in- geniously propose putting my criticism. But really, clever as the humor of it is, it is not right, because the allegation, ‘as it stands, is false. : Could I sit down and talk this matter over with you, I could probably satisfy you that — personal feelings’ and interests aside —I have been only loyal to my trust, as you would wish the minister of your own family to be. * By reference to the communication that appeared th the Boston Tran- script, it will be seen that the writer distinctly specifies “« Burnham’s Hen Fever.” It was not denied by Mr. Huntington in the place where the “allegation ’’ originated. FAST DAY SERMON REVIEWED. 15 The public judgment, however, in such a case, is not likely to be wrong; and, if it were, God, who knows all, will do right. So far from your ever having injured me, my dear sir, T have had pleasant and most favorable impressions of you. * * * I would sooner cut off my hand than do you an _ intentional injury, and I will gladly put forth both hands to render you any service. And yet I do wish you had not written this volume; or else, that, having written it, you will, in a future edition, give it a tone more strictly con- demnatory of all deception in ‘‘ fancy” trading. I am, very sincerely, your friend, F. D. Huntineron. Mr. Huntineron is pleased to class the ‘ History of the Hen Fever” with Barnum’s book, but pronounces it weaker and more vapid than that work. The Philadel- phia Merchant, a candid and highly-respectable journal, insists that, ‘‘if there is one book in the world that can claim superiority over add others in the quality of fun, real genuine richness of wit, then that one book is decidedly Burnham’s, History of the Hen Fever. This contagion, and. others of similar type, is most provokingly, though truthfully, exhibited in this work, which will have a tend- ency to subdue the fever, and lead to'a convalescence of some of the patients.” The New York Mirror declares that ‘none other of the manias of this century has been so fully, or at least so 16 REV. F. D. HUNTINGTON’S truly and humorously recorded, as that of the ‘Hen Fever.’ As to the descriptive matter, only the book itself —the whole book, read from the title-page to the last claws — can convey any just idea of it. It is fact, philos- ophy and fun, kneaded by a skilful hand into a large mor- sel, which no one will weary of chewing. We have read many diverting and instruetive histories, but never have we read so diverting a work on natural history and its connec- tions as this. It ought to be read by everybody.” The Fireside Journal says, that ‘‘ what Mr. Burnham now publishes as a ‘history’ is essentially his own ‘ Bar- num Biography’ quoad hoc. It has this advantage, in a literary point of view, over the book of the great Bar- numbo, that it has a unity —a beginning, middle, and end. It is an epic of humbug, in which the machinery’of lies is not called in to excite twenty-five cents’ worth of curiosity about a bed-ridden old woman, or a woolly horse, but to clothe deformity in feathers, and excite millions with a sleepless anxiety to propagate it.”’ The Boston Daily Times, in a long criticism, says, “We believe that the author has stated nothing but what he has had capital reasons for believing to be the truth. The work is more of a whole than most of its author’s writ- ings. The various chapters depend upon one another very closely, which is a strong proof of the artistic construction’ of the work. Of the singular phase in the business life of a ‘‘smart” people, Mr. Burnham, who was in the very thick of the whole affair,— buying and selling, writing and speaking, importing fowls from anywhere, and exporting them to everywhere, — corresponding with the secretary of English FAST DAY SYRMON REVIEWED. 1T royalty, and with gentlemen whose written words were out- done in point of beauty of penmanship by the scratches of. their hens,-— has given a full account in the volume before us. We believe that his history is an impartial one ; that is, as impartial as he could afford to make it. We are sure that at ts very interesting.” The Portland State of Maine says, ‘‘ We were prepared for a second revelation of something like Barnum’s hum- bugs when we saw the announcement of this book ; but a reading of it at once displaces such an idea. There is none of that sanctimonious obtrusion of honesty and uprightness which makes Barnum detestable. Though we had inly de- termined not to laugh, we could not resist. The story is told with such a naive air as to be irresistible. We never understood before the extent and origin of the ‘ Fever,’ which, a few years since, so overspread the country. All who like hearty jokes will find here an abundance.” The Boston Daily Journal remarks that ‘The full enormity of the fowl humbug the public will not learn until they read this book; and in the perusal even the. vic- tims must daugh, when they find what means were used to keep up the excitement, and what Tom Noddies they made of themselves. It will be of no use to be indignant, nor to say that the author was unprincipled and knavish in. his. dealings with the unfortunate victims of the hen mania..: * * * Both the great showman Barnum and the hen fancier have been successful in humbugging the public; both have given the public, in return for their bountiful patronage, most amusing books; and both now probably: pace 2* Rak, 2 eee “Ene ? 18 REV. F. D. HUNTINGTON'S stand well with the aggregation of humanity, which, some philosopher has said, loves to be humbugged.”’ The Troy Daily Budget, in its criticism, alludes to Mr. Barnum’s work, and insists that, of the two, “ Burnham’s book is the best. Itis the most natural, the most enter- taining, the most witty, and the most honest. If the author gives us the history of any transaction that is a little erooked in some of its details, the reader is not shocked, on passing to the next page, by-any sanctimonious hypocrisy. As a book, the work is a decided hit. There is, here and there, a touch of honest, plain, practical common sense, underlying the sparkle of wit and merriment, that may be turned to profitable account ‘by readers who, at this some- what late day, feel the premonitory symptoms of this dan- gerous disease. The volume will have an extensive sale.” The Boston Morning Post says, that ‘‘Mr. Burnham's narration is exceedingly readable, and his introduced letters beat those of Fanny Fern all to pieces. He seems to have come out of the ‘fever’ with a full purse, and a small stock of the ‘pure’ breeds of. Cochin-China and Chitta- gong. The book is written in an off-hand style, which seems to be in accordance with the mood of the writer. Some of its hits are hard, but they are dealt so pleasantly and cheer- ily that there can be ‘no offence’ taken. The illustrations are numerous and spirited. We must confess that this laughing, bantering, shrewd and free-and-easy medical work has instructed us wonderfully concerning the idiotic and expensive disenae to the _ description of which it is: de- voted.” ~ — The New York Spirit of the Times says, “ The His- FAST DAY SERMON, REVIEWED. 19 tory of the Hen Fever, by Geo. P. Burnham, Esq., is brim full of fun and richness. Every ‘chicken man’ will, of course, read this book, and if it doesn’t wring a good, hearty laugh out of him, why, he may take my hat! Burn- ham has made a ‘hit.’ His new book will have an immense run, equal only to his enormous sales of Shanghaes in the last six years. In this ‘History’ the humbug itself, and the agents who have been instrumental in sustaining it for the last half-dozen years, are shown up in a good-natured but ludicrous style, and the tricks of the hen-trade are ex- posed in a thorough but laughter-moving style. The work is finely illustrated, and the thousands of. victims to the hen fever will pay one dollar and a quarter more to learn ‘ haw the thing was done.’ ”’ Mrs. Coartotre T. Sumner, of Cambridge, Mass., a lady whose taste, discrimination, and judgment in literary matters, will not be called in question, voluntarily forwarded to the author of this book the following letter, a few days before its publication. An advance copy was sent her for criticism. This letter will speak for itself. Cambridge, March 9th, 1855, Dear Srr: I have just concluded a most agreeable sit- ting of five hours over the advance sheets of your happily- conceived book, the ‘History of the Hen Fever,” the pages of which you so kindly furnished me to criticize, as a, ‘ Jady-reader.” To tell you that I have been immeasurably gratified and amused. by this curious yet remarkable volume of humor, 1 20: REV. F. D. HUNTINGTON'S would be but. faint praise indeed! I wAS DELIGHTED WITH IT; and, to convince you how intensely interested I was by- it, I need only assure you that I did not leave the lounge” on which I was seated, from the moment of commencing with the dedication, until my eye fell upon the finale of . your most laughable and spirited book. Permit me to congratulate you on the CERTAIN success that must attend you with this volume, and to express the hope that you may have thousands of Lavy readers for this charmingly-pleasant and mirth-moving volume, which has afforded me so much gratification. Respectfully yours, CuartotTre T. SUMNER. To George P. Burnuam, Esq., Boston, Mass. Mrs. H. Marion Srepuuys, the gifted and popular authoress, in a letter to one of the leading literary journals. in New York city, thus compliments this book. “Talking of the ‘Hen Fever’ —have you read Burn- ham’s book? Of course you have. Through the courtesy of the author I received an early copy, and I have n’t done crowing over it-yet. My other half had been lying ill for.. some days.when the book came, and I first opened it late in the evening, for the purpose of reading him to sleep. Books, now-a-days, are such splendid soporifics ! Let some M. D. prescribe a dozen pages of any recent novel, and see how it takes the wake out of people’s eyes. Well, as I was saying, I read a few pages, waiting for the accustomed snore - FAST DAY SERMON REVIEWED. 241 — hard breathing, I mean, the precursor of a sound sleep — but no such announcement came! I read on, and on, interrupted occasionally by a quiet smile, until the gas-light in my chamber mingled with the soft beams of the morning —— on and on, until the faint and far-off sounds which herald the waking up of the city came near and more near, finally merging into earnest and active life — until the milk-carts rattled, and the organ-grinders were at their work — in fact, till the Zas¢ word of the last, last page made me wish there were a few more left of the same sort to breakfast upon. That Burnham has achieved a triumph in the way of humorous literature, the rapid sale of his book is ample proof; that he is entitled to the thanks of the multitude, many a reader, who has read his way out of an ocean of ‘blues,’ will readily admit; and that he has my sincere thanks, no less for the courtesy shown me in the presenta- tion copy, than for the amusement its perusal occasioned, he can no more doubt than he can doubt the success of his popular work.” Mitchell’s New York Citizen pita: that, ‘‘ with all their reputation for shrewdness, there is no people, perhaps, on the face of the earth, so easily humbugged as Yankees. Certain it is that in Yankeedom alone is the profession of humbug respectable. The most notorious example of this is Barnum’s Autobiography, in which he describes the various humbugs he had practised on the people of the northern states — tells not only of their gullibility, but of their love of being gulled, provided it is done in a scientific manner. One striking feature that exhibited itself in the midst of this mania was the fact that among the leading 22 REV. F. D. HUNTINGTON’S dealers in fancy poultry constantly appeared the names of. the clergy, who fanned the flame till the fever reached the. crisis, and speculated largely in ‘ Chittagongs,’ ‘ Brahmas,’ and other fancy stock. Our author has selected only one species of humbug, and Mr. Burnham, by concentrating his energies in the cultivation of this species, has therein beaten Barnum, whose genius has spread itself over so many species, and so many varieties of the same species. Mr. Geo. P. Burnham, of Russet House, Melrose, Mass., says he has accumulated, in six years, the sum of thirty thou- sand dollars from the ‘hen fever;’ and, having that amount, safely invested, he laughs to scorn all who despise the means by which he has ascended to uppertendom, just.as the miser, described in Horace, despises the hisses of the mob. ‘ when he looks at his money in his strong box.” ~ The Yarmouth Register says, ‘‘It would be amusing, were it not too serious a matter for mirth, to recount all the bubbles and delusions by which grasping and credulous humanity has, from time to time, been taken in and ‘ done. for,’ and which readily suggest themselves to the mind on taking up this book. * * * The Hen Fever, of which Mr. Burnham is now the historian, raged from 1849 to the middle of 1854. It proved remarkably infectious, and seized upon all classes, from governors to grooms, from statesmen to stable-boys; and the author’s personal reminiscences may be looked upon as the history of the fever in all its stages. The book is exceedingly interesting and amusing, and lets us into the secrets of speculation and the arts of sharpers, in a manner that. ought to prove a warning and example in future time.” FAST DAY SERMON REVIEWED. 23 Such are a few voluntary opinions, in different quarters, taken from among several hundred favorable criticisms of the “History of the Hen Fever,” and which speak for themselves, malgré the charges of the reverend Mr. Hunt- ington. At least, these opinions are vastly at variance with his own. In the volume thus assailed I have given facts as they occurred, in the main, with but slight attempts at sketches of ‘*fancy ;”? and if the statements thus set down surpass what I should have dared to invent (had I been engaged on a work of fiction, merely), the fault is not mine, but rather in the realities that have existed. I have been compelled to take the ‘world as I have found it. Had it been within my power, I. would have painted the enormities of the poultry mania asa delicious dream, or as something quite paradisiacal in its nature and its incidents, with which my reverend critic would have undoubtedly been highly pleased ; or, at least, not so displeased with as to have made my humble “ History” a chief subject for his sermon on that day which is commonly set apart for the consideration of the “ great’’ public sins of the people. It is because I have told the truth, perhaps, at times, in a tone of persiflage, that the worthy clergyman has thus thought proper to arraign me before the public as a most pertinent illustration in his sermon on lying; whereas, had I really lied in this ‘‘ History,” he would very likely have thought of nothing of the kind. The reverend Mr. Hun- tington should deal with human nature,—the reformation of which he is expected to seek,— and not with me, who have only placed before, the world the facts that show, in a 24 REV. F. D. HUNTINGTON'S measure, how that nature displayed itself under certain very peculiar circumstances. In my humble experience, I have found that this human nature exhibits itself in all spheres of life, among all pér- sons and professions, in a similar way. The very ‘“ shrewd- ness” that the reverend gentleman condemns, in wholesale terms, is a part of the system of life, everywhere. The demand, in all markets, regulates both the supply and the price of articles needed or desired. The poor village clergyman, who, for the general service rendered annually to his little flock, receives his stipend of a few hundred dollars per year, cannot compete with his aristocratic brother, who officiates at the silver font, and marble altar, and velvet-cushioned pulpit, in the wealthy city church. The latter has no disposition to exchange places with his humbler brother, however, nor should he do this, in my judgment. And wherefore? Because his talents are really of a higher quality, his services are of a higher value, he ean readily (and deservedly) obtain a higher price for the “marketable commodity ’’ which he has*to dispose of, in his own way; ‘‘the people” desire it, run after it, will enjoy it, are willing to pay for it thus roundly; and he, appro- priately, SELLS It for the most he can get for it. Is there any whit of change in the principle here involved ? Not the slightest. To carry the argument one point further. Do we not occasionally find; even among the most talented and fortu- nately circumstanced of the city clergy, some man of mark who is willing to exchange his pulpit for the chair of a College Professorship, because of the preferment involved FAST DAY SERMON REVIEWED. 25 in the emoluments or position thus offered? My respected and reverend critic will not deny me that such an instance has been heard of, I think; while I will cheerfully grant him the right that I think exists in such a. case. Ail market commodities, I say, are regulated by the bond fide demand for them; and he, or they, who may feel disposed to pay the highest price for goods, chattels, services, talents, birds or beasts, has the most unquestionable right to them. In the second place, if Mr. Huntington’s censure means anything, it means that facts which show the actions of men in a light not altogether agreeable ought never to be published ; particularly if the spirit of exaggeration should have characterized the events narrated. Thus the history of humanity, as he would choose to have it written, would form a very remarkable series of books, truly! Not one thing out of the common order would be permitted to have place in their pages. This arrangement might make very moral reading, but the moralist who should go out to fight the battle of life with only the knowl- edge thus obtainable, would surely find that he was very like the youth who ‘‘ went to sea’’ because he had heen amused by sailing on a fish-pond. Real life is a rough business ; its only play is horse-play ; and I am inclined to the opinion, that though it is an indisputable pity that the good are not competent to be men’s sole guides through it, even the example of the wicked is of some use in it, by way of warning, if in no other way. Judging from the strictures contained in his Fast Day discourse, the reverend Mr. Huntington would have no 3 26 * REV. F. D. HUNTINGTON'S histories of popular delusions laid before tho world, from the fear that the reading of them might chance to teach men how to deceive; forgetting that such works are quite as useful (if not the most useful) in preventing the many being imposed upon as they are by the few crafty deluders. He would evidently have men ignorant; although his co- worker, Mr. Garrison, in commenting upon this same subject, declares that already, ‘‘Morally speaking, the whole nation is rotten; with its four millions of human beings plundered of every right, and registered as so much bona fide property by their plunderers.”’ ‘Still, my friend Mr. Garrison, whose opinion is a valued and valuable one, also asserts that he thinks this book of mine ‘‘may serve to put honest, well-meaning people on their guard in respect to any new delusion that may be started hereafter, for the purpose of picking their pockets.” The reverend critic of my humble ‘“ History” would have all men remain in ignorance of the deception, and fraud, and chicanery, and evils, that attended the Tulip mania, the South Sea bubble, the Mississippi scheme, and a hundred similar delusions, because such knowledge might lead them astray. Just as if men, being informed of the existence of a pit on a road they were compelled to travel, should insist upon walking deliberately into it, instead of turning such information (as they more naturally do) to purposes of safety. The reverend Mr. Huntington is a good man; too good, I fear, but not too wise, for a world in which they make half-dimes and three-cent pieces ! Mr. Huntington alludes to these transactions which I have narrated in my book, as if they were exceptional to FAST DAY SERMON REVIEWED. 27. the general course of the business world; thus showing how exceedingly unfumiliar he is with matters constantly transpiring under every-day observation, In his criticism of the ‘ History of the Hen Fever,” that work of so ‘objectionable’ a character, ‘recently published in this neighborhood,’’ he has uttered nothing that is not equally applicable to any and every form of ordinary business. The peculiarity of that business, of which I have given but a “running account,” J admit ; but, that it was pur- sued in a different way from any other calling or profession, or that its modus operandi were marked by a worse spirit than that which pervades the whole world of action, I deny as forcibly as it is given to me to deny anything. The ‘‘hen mania” was but one of the multitudinous forms in which the spirit of American enterprise manifests itself in the present age; an age preéminent for what may well be termed its material versatility. It originated, as even the Rev. Mr. Huntington will admit (especially if he shall have chanced of late to lunch upon a tough chicken), in a good intention; to wit, the desire to,improve the race of poultry in this country. This very soon came to bea business ; then, as it proved successful, that business degen- erated into speculation; in the midst of which, wrong unquestionably eventuated. Tried by the standard of abstract right, much happened that could not be defended, and which ought, pointedly, to be condemned.. Thus much is‘ cheerfully conceded, as simple. truth; though this con- cession in no way compromises my ‘‘record”’ of the. “* fever.”” Yet, the same remark will safely apply to ad/ the modes - 28 REV. F. D. HUNTINGTON’S of human enterprise, every one of which originated, profess- edly, in benevolent motives, was pursued for a time in legitimate ways, and then became a means of speculation. The reverend gentleman has only to step behind the curtain of the business world to find that in ¢his, at least, I do not exaggerate! There is not one trick, or a single act of folly, that is narrated in the ‘ History of the Hen Fever,’”’ which is not paralleled.in the most sober of those modes of busi- ness by which very many of even Mr. Huntington’s own social circle and congregation obtain their livelihood, or accumulate their wealth. His very salary is paid, to-day, out of moneys obtained by means that it would hardly be palatable or proper to disclose, or describe to him. Yet the céin he thus receives, like that which Vespasian exhibited to his son Titus, does not emit a ‘bad odor”? —it is not offensive to him. Into all kinds of business,— in the buying and selling of sugar, and coffee, and cotton,—in the traffic that attends the purchase and sale of rice, or flour, or rum,— there enters, largely and continuously, the same spirit of exag- geration, of delusion, of speculation, of trickery and deceit, and open_cheatery, in a greater or less degree. ‘‘ Two wrongs do mot make one right,” Iam aware; yet I con- tend, again, that the mode of operations current during the prevalence of the ‘‘ hen'fever’’ is by no means the excep- tion to the rule ; and upon this account do I protest against the reverend gentleman’s singling out this ‘sin,’ and against the animadversions and extraordinarily personal specifications embodied in his Fast Day discourse. The stock-exchange is not generally supposed to bea . FAST DAY SERMON REVIEWED. - 29 half-way house on the road to heaven; and men who derive their incomes from lottery money and usury are suspected by some people of being not altogether -indifferent to the trickery of this world! I am not speaking censoriously, but rather by way of comparison and illustration. I may well leave the work of censure to preachers who are content to compound for their silence on the sins of those from whom they derive their means of liberal support, by at- tempting to lash what they believe to be the sins of strangers ; and who, in-their curious zeal, are prone in this work to display a larger share of ignorance than knowledge of the great world outside of their sphere, and more of un- charitablenesss than of both the other qualities. While “lying lips ave an abomination to the Lord;” while the ‘lie of cowardice,” the “ lie for amusement,”’ the ‘he of malice,’ and the “lie of self-interest,”’ are both dis- graceful and abominable, so, too, the lie that lurks beneath a smiling front, the lie that is often unconsciously secreted behind our pretensions, our motives, our wishes, or our acts, is equally heinous in the sight of the Great Searcher of hearts! ‘his secre¢ lie— the lie given to ourselves, to our professions, to our better nature — this great and fearful innate paradox in man’s composition, is too often forgotten when we descant upon the shortcomings of. others; while it is rarely, if ever, recognized in our own individual making up !- . I have already pointed out that the reverend Mr. Hunt- ington was not justified in citing this book in illustration of his “lie of self-interest,” because what is therein set down 3% 80 REV. F. D. HUNTINGTON’S is the truth,—a narrative of what took place, generally, for the time being,— as thousands well know, to their cost, and as they are likely long to remember. Had I invented a series of lies and fraudulent transactions with which to make out my “record,” and held the picture up as a pic- ture of the age, I admit that the book would have been amenable to pulpit criticism, perhaps; though I should, even then, have done only what has been done by all the ‘‘ sveat masters’ and little mistresses in fictitious literature for centuries, and all of whose works Mr. H. must con- demn, if his censure upon ‘‘ Barnum and Burnham”’ be correct. I write this illustratively,— to show to what the reverend critic’s views would lead if carried to their logical conse- quences; and I insist that a minister of the Gospel is hardly warranted in saying anything in his pulpit which will not bear the most rigid application. For a moment, then, let us compare what Mr. Huntington assumes to say with. what has been said by other persons of equal character for good judgment and piety with himself. He has charac- terized this volume as ‘“‘ weak and vapid,” of an unhealthy tone and immoral influence, and claims that it ‘represents the habit of selling goods under false pretences as no more than a joke,” &c. : Now, we have the voluntarily-expressed opinions of more than thirty religious journals,— publications of the very best character, high-toned family papers,— which are just the reverse of what Mr. H. assumes respecting the “ His- tory of the Hen Fever.” These journals warmly commend it, and, to quote their own words, it “ abounds with prac- FAST DAY SERMON REVIEWED. 31 tical information ;”’ it ‘conveys a valuable lesson ;” it is likely to be ‘“ productive of a deal of good,” é&c. The editor of Hunt's Merchants’ Magazine (who read the book) states that ‘This volume is a history of the hen speculation. It is written in Mr. Burnham’s well- known style of wit and satire, and it will be extensively read, because its facts and fictions are both attractive. This speculation did not involve so serious results as to make a sportive account of it objectionable. Whoever takes up this volume will read it through with a lively interest, and be richly amused.” More than three hundred other secular journals, too,— of all grades of influence, and standing, and character,— have joined voluntarily in pronouncing this ‘a veritable history;‘’ a ‘‘most remarkable volume;’ one of the “most readable books ever published;’’ a work ‘that is truly a humorous and reliable record;” really “‘a most captivating production ;’’ it is “‘running over with spice and genuine mirth throughout ;’’ it will ‘be read by every body ;” there are ‘‘few books to compare with this ex- traordinary volume ;” a ‘‘ pleasanter work has never been issued from the American press;” an ‘‘ admirably well- written ‘history’ of the most ludicrous of manias;” a ‘volume of genuine merit, that everybody should read,” &e. &e. Is it likely that the conductors of these many moral and literary journals should ai/ be so stupid, or so wicked, as thus to praise a book that was of an immoral and objection- able tendency? Does not common charity dictate, rather, that the Rev. Mr. Huntington might be the mistaken per- a 32 REV. F. D. HUNTINGTON’S son’ in this case, and not so many disinterested critics," most, if not all, of whom are in the habit of taking a part in the active affairs of life, who themselves saw much of what is related, and who do not believe that it can injure the morals of community to place before it a concise account of what was seen by thousands, and in which so many were prominent actors? I cannot agree to the assumption that the Press is not quite as likely to prove as good, as con- scientious, and as useful a guardian of public morality, as the Pulpit. . Upon the day that Mr. Huntington delivered this criti- cism it is strange that he should have chosen such subjects upon which to employ his well-known and powerful talents. The present:age abounds with really great themes,— themes to which great minds instinctively recur whenever they undertake to instruct the less gifted, and the discussion of which is especially adapted to express, occasions of public worship and ‘humiliation. I might point the reverend gentleman to the great, the all-absorbing ‘question of Slavery, the solution of which is supposed to involve that of our future national life. There is the kindred subject of the Nebraska abomination, which threatens to convulse the Union, from New York to San Francisco. The Temperance question, too, about which so many legislatures are at this hour concerning themselves with so deep an interest, might well have claimed an hour’s consideration. ‘ne War topic,— the great political move- ments now so intimately connected with Religious Freedom, —the philosophy or the errors of the “spiritual phenom- ena,” which has over three millions of believers in its truth FAST DAY SERMON REVIEWED. 383 N to-day in the United States,—and others, of consequence to the community and to humanity. Where was Mr. H. upon all these important matters? Had he no views on any one or all of these for his expecting hearers on Fast Day, when it was supposed he would with his eloquence encourage the good and cause the wicked to tremble ? No! He passed over all the ‘crying sins” of the age, —all the flagrant acts of the statesmen and the rulers of the country,— all the abuses of our political system,— all the crimes of the nation and the people,—all the errors of the great world at large,—and ‘came down,” with a tremendous force, upon the autobiography of a showman, and the simple history of a hen fever! He suffered my friends President Pierce and Senator Douglas to escape his censure, in order that he might the more completely ‘erush out” Mr. Burnham and Mr. Barnum! The rey- erend speaker had no time to lash the dealers in men and women, because he was bound to exterminate the traffickers in ‘ no-haired horses” and ‘“‘ pure-bred poultry’?! Every- thing was made to give way to the great business of placing under the moral ban men whose sins were of so enormous a character that they amount to telling wnpleasant truths; which was not what the Rev. Mr. Huntington did in his Fast Day Sermon; — for, whatever may have been his in- tentions, it is certain that he made the same sort of blunders that every man must make (no matter what may be his native cleverness) who undertakes to instruct before he has made himself conversant with the details of his subject. . No one will question the reverend gentleman’s scholar- ship, his reading, his eloquence, his goodness of heart, or 34 REV. F. D. HUNTINGTON’S the healthfulness of his motives; but of active life,— of that bustling, pushing, fighting, cheating, crowding, never- sleeping collection of human animals which men call ‘ the world,’ and which has no taste or leisure for the subtleties of the closet and the library,—he is evidently not so well informed ag are some other persons that could be pointed out, and whose experience in contact with that ‘‘ world” has been far more extended than his own. I regret that I cannot but think that Mr. Huntington, in this sermon, displayed a lack of courage, as well as of world-knowledge. He lashed what he deemed the publicans and sinners, but where were his burning words against the scribes and pharisees? It was safe to touch (and that not gently, either), by direct implication, at least, the sins of Barnum and Burnham; but it “ was not profitable” to allude to the sins of certain respectable personages who either then surrounded the eloquent speaker, or, at any rate, who dwelt within hig reach! Had the reverend gen- tleman, after applying the scourge to the immoral author and the noted showman, by way of offset have ‘‘ reasoned of righteousness, temperance, and the judgment to come,” until the Felixes of State, and Kilby, and Milk, and Wash- ington strects should"have trembled before him, and have dreamed of some more ‘“ convenient season ”’ for hearing him, I could not so well have complained of his injustice and uncharitableness. In illustrating his ‘lie of self-interest,’ where was his lash for the banks, whose lies are found on the faces of their notes— those ‘‘ promises” which are so often violated? Where were the anathemas which might have been so right: FAST DAY SERMON REVIEWED. 85 eously hurled at huge and soulless corporations, which ob- tain special privileges by-agreeing to perform what they never do or can perform? Why did he omit to make men- tion, in this connection, of the whole list of other business pursuits, and neglect to show that, from each and all of them, he could cull most forcible illustrations of the “lies of self-interest ”— from the great bankers who loan mil- lions ‘to the best of cut-throats”’ in aid of the destruc- tion of the liberties of nations, down to the pettiest dealer in molasses and codfish, who imposes upon the wretched, poverty-stricken creatures, who have no choice but to buy his semi-poisonous wares, on his own terms? Where was the reverend critic’s scourge for the importers, manufac- turers, and sellers of ardent spirits, who are doing Satan’s work here on earth ? Where was his whip for the men who readily take mortgages on poor, down-trodden southern negroes, selling the mother into one state, the father into another, and the little ones into a third? Why did he not hold up to deserved scorn the adulterators of goods — the men who make of rum itself a far worse poison, and who enhance the powers of arsenic to injure? He had no word for such as ¢hese; but ‘‘liars for self-interest,’”’ like Bar- num and Burnham, were consigned, by the reverend gen- tleman’s conclusions, to a part in “‘ the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone, which is the second death ’’ ! It may be that when, in common even with sinners like our humble self, the talented and able Mr. Huntington shall be called upon to answer for that which has been left wn- done in this life, it will not be held as a justification of his having totally neglected the sins of his ‘“ hearers,’”’ that he 36 REV. F. D. HUNTINGTON’S FAST DAY SERMON. was terribly severe at the expense of Barnum and Burn- ham; with the errors of neither of whom, on this occasion, can I conceive he had any special éall to concern himself, directly. But, ‘God, who is the Judge of all,” will set the mat- ter right between us, both in this and in the life to come. In response to the Rev. Mr. Huntington’s kindly-worded letter to me, I will not omit to add, in conclusion, that so far as his motives were concerned on the occasion to which I have taken exception, I do not now hesitate to acknowl- edge my belief that he judged he was ‘‘ doing God service” in the character of his discourse. But as there are two sides to opinions, usually ; and as J think his course was erroneous (however honestly intended), I have deemed this brief. re- view of that portion of his Fast Day sermon which related to me and my humble book, both necessary and just, to myself and my readers. Gro. P. BurneaM. Russet House, Melrose, April 20th, 1855. (GFNOTE TO SECOND EDITION. <3 I have deemed it proper to publish this Review in connection with the second edition of my book, in order that those who read this may have the opportunity to peruse the ‘‘ History of the Hen Fever,” also, and pass judgment upon the whole matter for themselves. © THE HISTORY THE HEN FEVER. SB Humorous Record, lar | GEO. P. “BURNHAW. Xn one Volume.=-¥llustrated BOSTON: JAMES FRENCH AND COMPANY. NEW YORK: J. C. DERBY. PHILADELPHIA: T. B. PETERSON, Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1866, by GEHORGE P. BURNHAM, In the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the District of Masaa- dusetta, STUNNOTYPRD BT HOBART & ROBBINS, New England Type and Stereotype Foundery, BOSTON. GEO. U. RAND, PRINTER, 8 CORNHILL. TO THE Amateurs, Funciers, and Breeders oF . POULTRY, THE SUCCESSFUL AND UNFORTUNATE DEALERS, THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES 5 AND THE VICTIMS OF MISPLACED CONFIDENCE IN THE HEN TRADE, GENERALLY, I DEDICATE This Volume. PREFACE. In preparing the following pages, I have had the opportunity to inform myself pretty accurately regarding the ramifications of the subject upon which I have written herein; and I have endeavored to avoid setting down “aught in malice” in this “ History of the Hen Frver” in the United States. I have followed this extraordinary mania from its incipient stages to its final death, or its cure, as the reader may elect to term its conclusion. The first symptoms of the fever were exhibited in my own house at Roxbury, Mass., early in the sum- mer of 1849. From that time down to the opening of 1855 (or rather to the winter of 1854), I have been rather intimately con- nected with the movement, if common report speaks correctly ; and I believe I have seen as much of the tricks of this trade as one usually meets with in the course of a single natural life. Now that the most serious effects of this (for six years) alarm- ing epidemic have passed away from among us, and when “ the people” who have been called upon to pay the cost of its support, and for the burial of its victims, can look back upon the scenes 1* VI PREFACE. that have in that period transpired with a disposition cooled by experience, I have thought that a volume like this might prove acceptable to the hundreds and thousands of those who once “took an interest in the hen trade,”-—-who may have been mortally wounded, or haply who have escaped with only a* broken wing; and who will not object to learn how the thing has ‘been done, and “ who threw the bricks’! If my readers shall be edified and amused with the perusal of this work as much as I have been in recalling these past scenes while writing it, I am content that I have not thrown the powder away. I have written it in perfect good-nature, with the design to gratify its readers, and to offend no man living. And trusting that a/Z will be pleased who may devote an hour to its pages, while at the same time I indulge the hope that none will feel aggrieved by its tone, or its text,-I submit this book to the public. Respectfully, Gro. P. Burnaam. Rosset House, Melrose, 1855. ? Baa58 en 23 HM HE GBH CONTENTS. . Premonitory SyMproms oF THE DisEASE, .... . Tae ‘‘ Cocurin-Cuinas.’? Bussite Numprr Onze, .. . Tue First Fown SHow 1n Boston, .......-. How ‘‘ Poutrry-Booxs’’ are Mapk, ....... THREATENING INDICATIONS, «2. + ee ee ee es Tae Errpemic SPREADING, .......4.- igi te Auarmina DEMONSTRATIONS, . 6... +. 2 eee Tae Fever WORKING, ... +. + ee ee ee Tue Sxconp Pouttry Saow 1n Boston, Sh ww Tas Murovat Apmiration Sociery’s Seconp SHow, Proaress OF THE Matapy,. . 1... se eee . My CoRRESPONDENCE, ...-. + see ee eese Tae OTHER SIDE oF THE QUESTION, ....... ** BorHer’EM Poorroums.’? Bussr—E NumBer Two, . ADVERTISING EXTRAORDINARY, » «ss. et oe & . Hereut of THE FEVER, .. 1.1.16 ee ee oe . RUNNING IT INTO THE GROUND,. . 2.2... eae . ONE oF THE Finan Kicks, ......+-+ . . Tae Fourth Fowt Suow 1n Boston, ...... . Present TO Queen VICTORIA, ....+..+. +64. EXPERIMENTS OF AMATEURS, . 6.41 1 5 se eee . True History oF ‘‘ Fanny FERN,”? .. 1... e+) VIII Chapter XXIII. . An Expensive Businuss,.. +. - . Tue Great Pacops Hen, ....-. CONTENTS. CoNVALESOENCE, » . . + + ee ee *‘ Ponicy THE Best Honusty,”’? . . . A Genuinrs Humpva, ....+. . Barnum in tHe Firup, ....-. . Frest ‘¢ Nationa’? Pourrry Saow Bagnoum’s Innate DIFFIDENCE, .. + - A Suprressep SPEECH,. ....- A “ConFIDENCE’?’ Man, .....- . Tue Essence or Humpua, .... A Trump Cagp,. ..- +2 ee ee . © Honp your Horses,” ..... TRICKS OF THE TRADE,....- Fina Deatu-Turors, .....- ere ee ee Tue Porte-Monnarz I Owsz ‘rm Company,. . - . A Sarisractory PepiaREr,... . . Dorina Toe GenTEEL THING, ... . . An Empuatic CLINCHER,. ... . “Sranp From Unper,” ..... . BursTina oF THE BUBBLE, ....... . THe DEap anp Wounpep, ... . . A Mournrun Proomssion, ..... My Smanouar Dinner, ...... ea . Tue Fate or THe ‘‘ Mopen’’? SHANGHAES, .... Page - 155 - 160 - «165 . - 176 . 182 - 190 - 198 - 204 - 218 - 220 » 224 - 229 « 6287 re ee » 248 - 262 « 259 - 268 » 278 . 279 - 288 « 294 - 802 - 807 - 812 - 818 HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. CHAPTER I. PREMONITORY SYMPTOMS OF THE DISEASE. I was sitting, one afternoon, in the summer of 1849, in my little parlor, at Roxbury, conversing with a friend, leisurely, when he sudgenly rose, and passing to the rear window of the room, remarked to me, with considerable enthusiasm, : ‘* What a splendid lot of fowls you have, B ! Upon my word, those are very fine indeed,— do you know it?” I had then been breeding poultry (for my own amuse- ment) many years; and the specimens I chanced at. that time to possess were rather even in color, and of good size; but were only such as any one might have had — bred from the common stock of the country — who had taken the samo pains that I did with mine. There were perhaps a dozen birds, at the time, in the to THE HISTORY OF rear yard, and my friend (then, but who subsequently passed to a competitor, and eventually turned into a sharp but harmless enemy) was greatly delighted with them, as I saw from his enthusiastic conversation, and his laudation of their merits. ' Tam not very fast, perhaps, to appreciate the drift of a man’s motives in casual conversation,— and then, again, it may be that I am ‘not so slow” to comprehend certain matters as I might be! At all events, I have sometimes flattered myself that, on occasions like this, I can “see as far into a millstone as can he who picks it;” and so I listened to my friend, heard all he had to say, and made up my mind accordingly, before he left me. “‘T tell you, B——, those are handsome chickens,” he insisted. ‘I’ve got a fine lot, myself, You keep but one variety, I notice. I’ve got ’em all. mm “ All what?” I inquired. “OQ, all kinds—all kinds. ‘The Chinese, and the Malays, and the Gypsies, and the Chittaprats, and the Wang Hongs, and the Yankee Games, and Bengallers, and Cropple-crowns, and Creepers, and Top-knots, and Gold Pheasants, and Buff Dorkings, and English Games, and Black Spanish and Bantams,—and I’ve several new breeds too, I have made myself, by crossing and mixing, in the last year, which beat the world for beauty and size, and excellence of quality.” THE HEN FEVER. 11 “Indeed!” I exclaimed. ‘So you have made several new breeds during one year’s crossing, eh? ‘That is remarkable, doctor, certainly. I have never been able yet to accomplish so extraordinary a feat, myself,” I added. ‘Well, I have,” said the doctor,—and probably, as he was @ practising physician of several years’ experience, he knew how this reversion of nature’s law could be accom- plished. I didn’t. “Yes,” he continued; ‘‘I have made a breed I call the ‘Plymouth Rocks,’ — superb birds, and great layers. The —a—‘Yankee Games,’ —regular knock-’em-downs,— rather fight than eat, any time; and never flinch from the puncture of steel. Indeed, so plucky are these fowls, that I think they rather dike to be cut up than otherwise,— alive, I mean. Then, I’ve another breed I’ve made — the ‘Bengal Mountain Games.’ These are smashers — never yield, and are magnificent in color. Then I have the ‘Fawn-colored Dorkings,’ too; and several other fancy breeds, that I’ve fixed up; and fancy poultry is going to sell well in the next three years, you may be sure. Come and see my stock, B——, won’t you? AndI’ll send you anything you want from it, with pleasure.” I was then the editor of a weekly paper in Boston. I accepted my friend’s kind invitation, and travelled- forty miles and back to examine his poultry. It looked well — very well; the arrangement of his houses, &c., was good, 12 THE HISTORY OF and I was gratified with the show of stock, and with his politeness. But he was an enthusiast; and I saw this at the outset. And though I heard all he had to say, I could not, for the life of me, comprehend how it was that he could have decided upon the astounding merits of all these differ- ent breeds of fowls in so short a space of time — to wit, by the crossings in a single year! But that was his affair, not mine. He was getting his fancy poultry ready for the market; and he repeated, ‘It will sel/, by and by.” And I believe it did, too! The doctor was right in this particular. He informed me that he intended to exhibit several specimens of his fowls, shortly, in Boston; and soon after- wards I met with, an advertisement in one of the agricultu- ral weeklies, signed by my friend the doctor, the substance of which was as follows : , Noricz. —I will exhibit, at Quincy Market, Boston, ina few days, sample pairs of my fowls, of the following ure breeds; namely, Cochin-China, Yellow Shanghae, lack Spanish, Fawn-colored Dorkings, Plymouth Rocks, White Dorkings, Wild Indian, Malays, Golden Hamburgs, Black Polands, Games, &c. &.; and I shall be happy to see the stock of other fanciers, at the above place, to compare notes, ete. etc. The above was the substance of the “notice” referred to; and the doctor, coming to Boston shortly after, called upon me. I showed him the impropriety of this movement THE HEN FEVER. 13 at once, and suggested that some spot other than Quincy Market should be chosen for the proposed exhibition,— in which I would join, provided an appropriate place should be selected. : After talking the matter over again, application was made to an agricultural warehouse in Ann-street, or Black- stone-street, I believe; the keepers of which saw the advan- tages that must accruo to themselves by such a show (which would necessarily draw together a great many strangers, out of whom they might subsequently make cus- tomers); but, at my suggestion, this very stupid plan was abandoned —even after the advertisements were circulated that such an exhibition would come off there. Upon final consideration, it was determined that the first Exhibition of Fancy Poultry in the United States of America should take place in November, 1849, at the Public Garden, Boston. 2 CHAPTER II. THE ‘“COCHIN-CHINAS.”” BUBBLY NUMBER ONE. A PUBLIC meeting was soon called at the legislative hall of the Statehouse, in Boston, which had the effect of draw- ing together a very goodly company of savans, honest: farm- ers, amateurs, poulterers, doctors, lawyers, flats, fanciers and humbugs of one kind or another. J never attended one of the meetings; and only know, from subsequent public and private “‘reports,” what occurred there. On this first occasion, however, after a great deal of bosh and stuff, from the lips of old men and young men, who possessed not the slightest possible shadow of practical knowledge of the subject proposed to be discussed, it was finally resolved that the name for the (now defunct) associa- tion then and there formed, should be ‘‘ The New England Society for the Improvement of Domestic Poultry” !!! | Now, the only objection I ever raised to this title was that it was not sufficiently Jengthy! When applied to for my own views on the subject, J recommended that it should be called the ‘Mutual Admiration Society.” But, though I THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. 15 was thought a great deal of by its members,— especially when the concern was short of funds,—in this case they thought my proposed title was altogether too applicable ; and the original name, above quoted, was adhered to. I was honored with the office of vice-president of the society, for Massachusetts; to which place I was reélected annually, I believe, until the period of its death. For which honor I was not ungrateful, and in consideration of which, ‘‘as in duty bound, I have ever prayed”? for the association’s prosperity and weal. The first name that was placed upon the list of sub- scribers to the constitution of this society was that of His Excellency Geo. N. Briggs, formerly Governor of this commonwealth. He was followed by a long list of “mourners,’’ most of whom probably ascertained, within five years from the hour when they subscribed to this roll, that causing the cock’s spur to grow between his eyes was not quite so easy a thing to accomplish as one “‘ experienced poultry-breeder ” at this meeting coolly asserted it to be! How many attempted this experiment (as well as numerous others there suggested as feasible), I am not advised. But Tam inclined to think that those who did try it found it to be ‘all in their eye.” While these gentlemen were arranging the details of the new “society,” and were deciding upon what the duties of the officers and committees should be, I quietly wrote out 16 THE HISTORY OF to England for information regarding the somewhat notori- ous “‘Cochin-China”’ fowl, then creating considerable stir among fanciers in Great Britain; and soon learned that I could procure them, in their purity, from a gentleman in Dublin, whose stock had been obtained, through Lord Heytshury (then Lord Lieutenant of Ireland), direct from Queen Victoria’s samples. I ordered six of them,— two cocks and four hens,—and in December, 1849, I received them through Adams & Co.’s Transatlantic Express. At this period there was no telegraph established from Boston to Halifax, I believe. Some of the reporters for the daily city papers usually visited the steamers, upon their arrival here, to obtain their foreign files of exchanges; and here my birds were firstigeen by those gentlemen who have made or broken the prospects of more than one enterprise of far greater consequence than this ‘‘ importation of fancy fowls’’ could seem to be. But on the day succeeding the coming of those birds, several very handsome notices of the arrival of these august Chinamen appeared in the Boston papers, and a vast amount of credit was accorded to the “ enterprising im- porter” of the outlandish brutes, that’ were described in almost celestial language ! : After considerable trouble and swearing (custom-house swearing, I mean), the officers on board permitted my team to take the cage out of the steamer, and it was conveyed to THE HEN FEVER. 17 my residence in Roxbury, where it arrived two hours after dark. T had long been looking for the coming of these Celestial strangers, and the ‘fever,’ which I had originally taken in a very kindly way, had by this time affected me rather seriously. I imagined I had a fortune on board that steamer. I looked forward with excited ideas to beholding something that this part of the world had never yet seen, and which would surely astound “the people,” when I could have the opportunity to show up my rare prize,— all the way from the yards or walks of royalty itself! I waited and watched, with anxious solicitude,— and, at last, © the box arrived at my house. It was a curiously-built box ° — the fashion of it was unique, and substantial, and foreign in its exterior. I supposed, naturally; that its contents must be similar in character. That box contained my ‘¢ Cochin-Chinas,’’— bred from the Queen’s stock,— about which, for many weeks, I had been so seriously disturbed. I am now well satisfied that the ““ Cochin-China”’ variety of fowl is a gross fable. If such a breed exist, in reality, we have never had them in this country. Anything (and everything) has been called by this name among us, in the last five years; but the engraving on the following page, in my estimation (and I have been there !), is the nearest thing possible to a likeness of this long petted bird; and will be recognized, I think, by more than one victim, as an 2* PORTRAIT OF THE ‘' COCHIN-CHINA » row! THE HEN FEVER. 19 accurate and faithful portrait of this lauded “ magnificent ” and ‘superb’? bird ! I was anxious to examine my celestial friends at once. I caused the box to be taken into a shed, at the rear of the house, and I tore from its front a piece of canvas that con- cealed them from view, to behold a porte — they were Cochin-China fowls! But, since God made me, I never beheld six such birds before, or since! They resembled giraffes much more well! 2’tm- nearly than they did any other thing, carnivorous, omniv- orous,— fish, flesh, or fowl. I let them out upon the floor, and one of the cocks seized lustily upon my India-rubber over-shoe, and would have swallowed it (and myself), for aught I know, had not a friend who stood by seized him, and absolutely choked him off! This is truth, strange as it may seem; but I presume they had scarcely been fed at all upon their fortnight’s voyage from Dublin, and I never saw any animals so mis- erably low in flesh, in my life, before. What with their long necks, and longer legs, and their wretchedly starved condition, I never wondered that the friendly reporters spoke of their appearance as being “‘extraordinary, and strikingly peculiar.” These were the original ‘‘ Cochin-China ” fowls of Amer- ica. And they probably never had the first drop of Chinese blood in their veins, any more than had the man 20 THE HISTORY OF THE DEN FEVER. who bred them, and who knew this fact much better than I did — who knew it well enough. I housed my “prize” forthwith, however, and provided them with everything for their convenience and comfort. The six fowls cost me ninety dollars. They were beauties, to be sure! When I informed a neighbor of their cost, he ventured upon the expressive rejoinder that I “‘ was a bigger d——d fool than he had ever taken me for.”’ To which I responded nothing, for I rather agreed with him myself! Nine months afterwards, however, I sold him a cock and three pullets, four months old, raised from those very fowls, for sixty-five dollars; and I didn’t retort upon him even then, but took his money. The chickens I seld him were “‘ dog-cheap,” at that ! CHAPTER III. THE FIRST FOWL-SHOW IN BOSTON. NEVER in the history of modern “bubbles,” probably, did any mania exceed in ridiculousness or ludicrousness, or in the number of its victims surpass this inexplicable humbug, the “hen fever.’’ Kings and queens and nobility, senators and governors, mayors and.councilmen, ministers, doctors and lawyers, merchants and tradesmen, the aristocrat and the humble, farmers and mechanics, gentlemen and commoners, old men and young men, women and children, rich and poor, white, black and gray,— everybody was more or less seriously affected by this curious epidemic. The press of the country, far and near, was alive with accounts of ‘‘extraordinary pullets,” ‘enormous eggs” (laid on the tables of the editors), ‘‘astounding prices” obtained for individual specimens of rare poultry; and all sorts of people, of every trade and profession and calling in life, were on the gui vive, and joined in the hue-and-cry, regarding the suddenly and newly ascertained fact that 22 > THE HISTORY OF hens laid eggs —-— sometimes ; or, that somebody’s crower was heavier, larger, or higher on the legs (and conse- quently higher in value), than somebody else’s crower. And the first exhibition of the society with the long name came off duly, at last, as agreed upon by the people, and myself. “The people’?! By this term is ordinarily meant the body-politic, the multitude, the citizens at large, the voters, the —the-—a—the masses; the well, no matter ! At the period of which I am now writing, the term signi- fied the ‘‘hen-men.’’ This covered the whole ground, at that time. Everybody was included, and thus nobody was left outside ! At this first show, the committee “ flattered themselves ”’ (and who ever heard of, or from, a committee that didn’t do this!) that never, within the memory of the oldest in- habitant,— who, by the way, was then living, bus has aince departed to that bourn from which even defunct hen- men do not return,— never had such a display been wit- neésed; never had the feathered race before appeared in such pristine beauty; never had any such exhibition been seen or read of, since the world begun! And, to say truth, it wasn’t a very bad sight,— that same first hen- show in Boston. Thousands upon thousands visited it, the newspapers appropriated column after column to its laudation, and all THE HEN FEVER. 28 sorts of people flocked to the Public Garden to behold the ‘rare and curious and inexpressibly-beautiful samples”’ of poultry caged up there, every individual specimen of which had, up to that hour, been straggling and starving in the yards of ‘the people” about Boston (they and their progeny) for years and years before, unknown, unhonored and unsung. Gilded complimentary cards, in beautifully-embossed envelopes, were duly forwarded by the ‘‘committee”’ to all “our first men,’’ who came on foot or in carriages, with their lovely wives and pretty children, to see the extraor- dinary sight. The city fathers, the public functionaries, governors, senators, representatives, all responded to the invitation, and everybody was there. The cocks crowed lustily, the hens cackled musically, the ducks quacked sweetly, the geese hissed beautifully, the chickens peeped delightfully, the gentlemen talked gravely, the ladies smiled beneficently, the children laughed joyfully, the uninitiated gaped marvellously, the crowd conversed wisely, the few knowing ones chuckled quietly, — everybody enjoyed the thing immensely,— and sud- denly, prominent among the throng of admirers present, loomed up the stalwart form and noble head of Daniel Webster, who came, like the rest, to see what he had only “read of” for the six months previously. 24 THE HISTORY OF The committee saw him, and they instantly lighted on him for a speech ; but he declined. “Only a few words!” prayed one of them. ‘¢One word, one word!” insisted the chairman. “T can’t !”’ said Daniel. But they were importunate and unyielding, that enthu- siastic committee. ‘¢ Gentlemen ! ’’ said the honorable senator, at last, amid’ the din. ‘Ladies and gentlemen!” he continued; as a monster upon feathered stilts, at his elbow, shrieked out an unearthly crow, that drowned the sound of his voice in- stanter, —“‘ Ladies and gentlemen, really —I—would — but the noise and confusion is so great, that I cannot be heard!”?— and a roar followed this capital hit,: that drowned, for the moment, at least, even the rattling, crash- ing, bellowing, squeaking music of the feathered bipeds around him. The exhibition lasted three days. Unheard-of prices were asked, and readily paid, for all sorts of fowls; most of those sold being mongrels, however. As high as thirteen dollars was paid by one man (who soon afterwards became an in- mate of a lunatic asylum) for a single pair of domestic fowls. It was monstrous, ridiculous, outrageous, exclaimed every one, when this fact— the absolute paying down of thirteen round dollars, then the price of two barrels of good THE HEN FEVER. 25 wheat flour — was announced as having been squandered for a single pair of chickens. I sold some fowls at that show. I didn’t buy any there, I believe. The receipts at the gates paid the expenses of the exhibi- tion, and left a small surplus in the hands of somebody,— I never knew who,— but who took good care of the money, I have not a doubt; as most of the officers at that time were, like myself, ‘‘ poor, but honest.” By the time this fair closed, the pulse of the ‘“ dear people” had come to be rather rapid in its throbs, and the fever was evidently on the increase. Fowls were in de- mand.e Not good ones, because nothing was then said by the anxious would-be purchasers about quality. Nobody had got so far as that, then. They wanted fowls only,— hens and cocks,— to which they themselves gave a name. Some fancied one breed, or variety, and some another ; but anything that sported feathers,— from the diminutive Bantam to the stork-shaped Chinaman,— everything was being sought after by ‘‘amateurs’”’ and “fanciers” with a zest, and a readiness to pay for, that did honor to the zeal of the youthful buyers, and a world of good to the hearts of the quiet breeders and sellers, who began first to get posted up, and inured to the disease. J was an humble and modest member of this latter class, I kept and raised only pure breeds of fowls. 3 CHAPTER IV. How ‘ POULTRY-BOOKS’’? ARE MADE. Soon after this, I learried that one Asa Rugg, of Pern- sylvania (a nom de guerre), was in the possession of a breed of fowls that challenged all comparison for size and weight. They were called the Chittagong fowl, and were thus described in the poultry-books published in 1850: “The fowl thus alluded to has been imported, within the last two or three years, into Pennsylvania, and ranks at the head of the list, in that region, for all the good qual- ities desirable in a domestic bird. The color is a streaked grey, rather than otherwise, and the portraits below” (my birds) ‘‘are fine samples of this great stock. They are designated as the Grey CuITTAaconas.” “Asa Rugg,” in his letter to me, described this stock as being at the head of the races of poultry, having “the largest blood in them of any variety of fowl with which he was acquainted.” The pair he first sent me were light-grey and streaked, and “at less than seven months old weighed over nineteen pounds.” THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. 27 He said, in that insinuating and delicate manner so peculiar to the habits of gentlemen who possess what another wishes to buy of them,—‘I did not intend, my dear Mr. B——, to part with these magnificent specimens at any figure whatever. I assure you I had much rather retain them; for they are very fine, as you would say, could you see them. If, however, you are disposed to pay wy price, I shall let you have them. I really shall regret their absence from my yard, however. Try and make up your mind to be satisfied with something else — won’t you? These fowls I must keep, if possible,’ &c. &c. Now, Asa knew very well, if he had charged me two hundred (instead of twenty) dollars for those grey fowls, I should have taken them from him. Of course I sent for them at once; and, within ten days, they were in my poultry-house, a new wonder for the hundreds who called to see my ‘‘superb ” and “ extraordinary ”’ fowls. A competitor turned up, a few months after this, a noto- rious breeder in P——, who, though a respectable man, otherwise, never knew a hen from a stove-pipe, but who had more money at that time than I had, and who, in the hen- trade, possessed the impudence of the devil, without the accompanying graces to carry out his object. This man chanced, while in Pennsylvania, to hear Asa speak of me, and at once he stepped in to ‘‘ head me”’ in that quarter. He bought all the “‘Girey Chittagongs”’ that 28 THE HISTORY OF Rugg had left (most of which, when they reached P : happened te be dark réd and brown), and forthwith set up an establishment in opposition to me; for what purpose I never knew. I did not know him from a side of sole- leather, I had never spoken to or of him, and I could ‘not comprehend why this person should render himself, as he did, my future ‘“death’s head’’ in the fowl-trade. If he went into the traffic for the purpose of making money out of it, he has found, by this time, I have no doubt, that he would have been, at the very least calcula- tion, five thousand dollars better off had he never thrust himself into a business of which he did not know the first rudiments. If he embarked in it to interfere with or to injure me, personally, he has now ascertained, I imagine, that’ it required a faster horse than he was in the habit of driving to keep in sight of my team. If his purpose was the gratification of his own petty spite or ambition only, he has had to pay for the enjoyment of it,—ay, to his dear cost! —and he is welcome to all he ever made out of his contemptible, niggardly huckstering. Soon after the first exhibition, it was announced by the publishers in Boston that Dr. Bennett’s new. Trea- tise would be immediately issued by them. ‘The doctor had originally applied to the establishment in which I was then a partner, to issue this work; but I recom- THE HEN FEVER. 29 mended him to the others, because our own facilities for getting it out were not so good as I thought were theirs. I furnished a considerable amount of the matter for that book, and had already obtained, at my own individual ex- pense, several of the engravings which appear in the work spoken of. After the original cuts were placed in the pub- lishers’ hands, they were reduced in size, and injured (for my purposes) as I conceived, when they finally appeared in print. The doctor’s book on poultry had been announced again and again; but it did not make its appearance in the mar- ket, in consequence of his tardiness. Week after week, and month after month, passed by, but still no Dr. Bennett’s book could be found. I saw some of the proof-sheets finally, observed the fate of the illustrations of my fowls, and made up my mind what I would do. The book was at last announced positively to appear in three weeks. Timmediately called at a stereotype foundery, and asked how much time it would require to stereotype a work of one hundred and fifty pages for me. I was told that it would occupy three to four weeks to complete it. ‘‘Can’t it be done in one week?” I inquired. The proprietor smiled, and said that this was impossible. I replied, ‘‘ Well, sir, to-day is Tuesday. I have engaged to deliver in New York city, on the morning of a week from next Saturday, three 3* 30 THE HISTORY OF thousand copies of a book which I am about to write. Is there no way that you can help me out?” The gentleman looked at me incredulously. . I added, ‘‘ Mr. , L have been in the newspaper busi- ness a good many years, and I have had the message of the President of the United: States — a document occupying a dozen columns of solid brevier and minion— set up and put to press within forty-two minutes from the time it reached our office. Anything can be accomplished, now-a- days, if we but will it.” ‘“* But, you say you are about. to write it. When will the ‘copy’ be ready ?”’ said the stereotyper. “T have thought of this,” I replied, ‘‘ but a few hours. The ¢itle, even, is not yet decided upon. I will give you fifty pages of manuscript to-morrow morning, the next day IT will add another fifty, and you shall have the whole in hand by Friday morning.” He kindly undertook to aid me. I engaged'three engray- ers, who worked day and night upon the drawings and transfers of the fowls for my illustrations; the paper was wet down on Monday and Tuesday ; I read the final revised proof of my work on Wednesday night; the book went to press on Thursday ; the binders were ready for it as it came up, the covers were put on on Friday morning, and I sent to the New York house (who had bespoken them), by Hlarnden’s Express, on Friday evening, three thousand THE HEN FEVER. 81 five hundred copies of the “‘Nrw Enanuanp Povrtry- Briever,” tlustrated with twenty-five correct engrav- engs of my choice, magnificent, superb, unapproachable, pure-bred fowls. : This book had an extraordinary sale,— far beyond my own calculations, certainly. I got it out for the purpose of “doing justice” to my own stock, and calculated that it would prove a good advertising medium for me,— which it did, by the way. But the demand for the ‘‘ New England Poultry-Breeder”’ was immense. And thirteen different editions (varying from three thousand five hundred to one thousand copies each) were issued within as many weeks, and were sold, every copy of them. This is the true his- tory of the ‘‘ New England Poultry-Breeder.” By and by Dr. Bennett’s book appeared. The market was now glutted with this kind of thing, and this work, though a good one, generally, dragged on the hands of its originators. I doubt if a thousand copies of this book ever found their way into the market, the author being too deeply engrossed with his then thriving trade, to trouble himself about urging the sale of his book, or of thinking about the interests of his publishers. CHAPTER V. THREATENING INDICATIONS. ANoTHER meeting was now called at the Statehouse, which was even more fully attended than the first, and at which much more serious indications of enthusiasm were apparent. Old men, and middle-aged farmers, and florists, and agri- culturists, and live-stock breeders, from all parts of this and the neighboring states, congregated together on this event- ful occasion, and entered into the debate with an earnestness worthy of so important and ‘‘ glorious” a cause. Some of the speakers had by this time got to be so elated and so ardent that they rehearsed all they knew, and some of them told of a great deal more than themselves or any- body else had ever dreamed of, bearing upon the subject of poultry-raising. But, really, the subject was an exciting one, and the talkers were excusable ; they could n’t help it! Shades of morus multicaulis victims! Shadows of defunct tulip-growers! Spirits of departed Merino sheep speculators! Ghosts of dead Berkshire pig fanciers! THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. 83 Where wer? ye all on that eventful night, when six hun- dred sober, ‘respectable’ representatives of ‘the people” were assembled within the walls of our time-honored state edifice upo. Beacon Hill, in serious and animated conclave, to decide the momentous question that ‘hens was hens,” notwithstanding, nevertheless ! ‘Mr. President,”’ exclaimed one of these gentlemen ‘whose speech was not publicly reported, I think), ‘‘ Mr. President, the times is propishus. We’re a-enterin’ on a new ery. The people is a-movin’ in this ’ere great, and wonderful, and extraordinary —I may say, Mr. President, this “ere soul-stirrin’ and ‘lectrefyin — branch of interestin’ rural erconomy.’”’ (Applause, during which the speaker advanced a step or two nearer to the presiding officer’s desk, wiped his nose fiercely upon a fiery-red bandanna handker- chief, and proceeded. ) “The world, Mr. President,” he continued, “ is a-growin’ wiser ev'ry day,—I may say ev’ry hour, Mr. President ! Ay, sir, evry minute.’ (Loud applause, amid which one- old gentleman in a bob-wig was particularly vociferous. ) “T say, Mr. President, the people is a-growin’ wiser con- tinu’lly ; and by that expression, sir, I mean to convey the idee that they are a-gettin’ to know more, sir! Who will gainsay this position? Whar’s the man —whar’s the er—individooal, sir — that ’ll stan’ up ’ere to-night, in this hallowed hall, under the shadder of this doom above our 34 THE HISTORY OF heads, sir in view of the great American eagle yender,— that ‘bird of promise,’ sir, and dispute the assertion that I now make, Mr. President, as an American citizen, with- out fear and without reproach!’’ (Deafening shouts of “‘ Nobody ! nobody can dispute it !’”) “No, sir! I think not, I wot not, I ventur’ not, I cal’k’late not! I say, Mr. President, it is no use for nun of us to contend agin the mighty ingine of progress; ’nless wed like to get our crowns mashed in for our pains, sir. That ’s the way it pears to me; and I’ve no doubt that this ’nlitened ordinance now present, sir, will agree with me on ¢his p’int, and admit the truth that present indica- tions, sir, p’int, with strikin’ force, to the proberble likeli- hood that the deeds begun here to-night must be forever perpetooated hereafter, and that — a — they will — er— go down, sir, to our children, and our children’s children, a posteriori, in the futur, forever!” (Yes, yes!” and thundering applause. ) “¢ But, sir, the p’int at issoo seems to me to be clear as the broad-faced sun on a cloudy day.. I’m no speaker, sir. Tam not the man, sir, that goes about to proclaim on tops of houses! I’m a quiet citizen, and calls myself one o’ ‘the people,’ sir. But w’en the questions comes up of thes natur’,—w’en it ’pears to me to be so clear and so transpa- rent, —w’en the people goes abroad, sir, in their might, and ——er—and can’t stay ter home,—w’en such things occurs, THE HEN FEVER. 35 ar, then J’m round!” (Shouts of ‘‘ Good ! good ! good !”’ the respectable old gentleman in the bob-wig creating a cloud of dust about him with his stamping and excited gestures. ) ‘‘ Mr. President, I have a’most done mm (No, no! Go on, go on!” from all parts of the house.) “No, sir; as I’ve said afore, I’m no speaker, an’ I make no pretenshuns to oraterry. I’m a plain man, sir; but I feel deeply interested in this subject.” (Nobody had yet ascertained what the ‘‘ subject’ was, because the gen- tleman had n’t alluded to any.) ‘‘ And, sir, I feel that I should be unjust to myself and to this ordinance ef I did not say what I have, sir. I go in for the poultry-breedin’, sir, all over! Sir, . I love ’em, I love °em, — an’ who shall dar’ To chide me for lovin’ and praisin’ them ’c7’e ? “T love ’em, sir,— chickens or poultry,— dead or alive. My father afore me loved ’em, sir; and I’m rejoiced to see the feelin’s that ’s exhibited here to-night. -And, ‘less any- body should suspect that I have ventured upon these few remarks with mercenary motives, Mr. President (though perhaps no such suppersishun would animate no man’s bosom), I will state, sir, that I have no fowls to sell, sir,— none whatever. No, sir! not a fowl! I’m a buyer, sir, —I want to buy,” shouted the excited man,— and he sat 36 THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVEK. down amid the deafening plaudits of his associates at this meeting, who fully appreciated his speech and his palpable disinterestedness. (Item.—I found this gentleman the next day, and informed him that I had heard of his destitution. I had understood that he had no poultry, but was in search of pure-blooded stock. Before night I had fully supplied him with genuine samples, at thirty dollars a pair, and no discount for cash.’’) Before this meeting concluded, the prices of fowls, and eggs, and feathers, were duly discussed, the details of which . I will defer to the next chapter. But all the indications at this convention were really of a threatening character; and it would have required’ the strength of several stout men to have held certain of the speakers as they got warmed up, and rattled away, for dear life, upon the advantages that must accrue to the nation, in a thousand ways, from the encouragement of this epidemic, and the certain, inevitable losses that must be sustained by “the people ”’ if they did n’t go into this thing with a rush, Most of these speakers, however, had fowls for sale ! CHAPTER VI. THE EPIDEMIC SPREADING. White all this was transpiring, my “‘ splendid ”” Cochin- China fowls had arrived from England, and I had had a nice house arranged, in which to keep and exhibit them to visitors. The pullets began to lay in January, 1850, and imme- diately afterwards my trade commenced in earnest, which continued, without interruption, up to the close of the year 1854. Among the ‘ monstrosities” presented at the second meeting at the Boston Statehouse were several propositions that were suggested by gentlemen-amateurs and farmers in regard to the price that should be fixed on, by members of the Society with the elongated title, for eggs sold for incu- bation. One man thought that ¢wo dollars a dozen for most of the fancy kinds would pay well. This gentleman (I do not remember who he was) probably calculated to furnish 4 38 THE HISTORY OF fancy egys as a certain agricultural concern had been doing for some months: that is, by first purchasing them at a shilling a dozen from the eastern packets, or in Quincy Mar- ket. The next man thought that ¢hree dollars per dozen would be fair. Another member believed that one dollar was enough for twelve eggs, ‘but he didn’t know much about it,” he acknowledged ; which was pretty evident from his remarks. At any rate, he had never fed a “ laying hen” long enough on good corn to ascertain how much she would devour while she was furnishing him with the said twelve eggs, I imagine! One gentleman, more liberally disposed, probably, ventured to express his willingness to pay five dollars a dozen for what he wanted. I understood he got home safely after the meeting, though it was feared he would be mobbed for his temerity in making. this ridic- ulous offer ! . T had already fixed my price for the eggs that were to be dropped by my “extraordinary and superb”? Cochin-China fowls, which by this time had got to be ‘‘ the admiration of the State” (so the newspapers said). I had the Jest fowls in this world, or in any other; this being conceded by every one who saw them, there was no necessity of ‘‘ talking the subject up” to anybody. I charged twelve dollars a dozen for my eggs — and never winked at it! . And why should n’t I have the highest price? Were not my fowls the ‘choicest specimens’ ever seen in America? THE HEN FEVER. 89 Didn’t everybody so declare? Didn’t the press and the poultry-books concede this, without an exception? Well, they did! And so, for months, I obtained one dollar each for my Cochin-China fowls’ eggs; and I received order after order, and remittance after remittance, for eggs (at this figure), which I could not begin to supply. And I didn’t laugh, either! I-had no leisure to laugh. I filled the orders as they came,— ‘‘ first come, first served,” —and for several months I found my list of promises six or eight weeks in advance of my ability to meet them with genuine eggs. I was not so well informed, then, as I was afterwards. I think all the eggs that were then wanted might have been had. But, as the boy said, when asked where all the stolen peaches he had eaten were gone, “I donno!” Will it be credited that, during the summer of 1850, I had dozens of full-grown men — gentlemen — but enthusi- astic hen-fanciers (who had contracted the fever suddenly), who came to my residence for Cochin-China eggs, at one dollar each. and who, upon being informed that I had n’t one in the house, would quietly sit down in my parlor and wait two, three, or four hours at a time, for the hens to lay them a few, that they might take them away with them? Such is the fact, however it may be doubted. I subsequently sold the eggs at ten dollars a dozen; then at six dollars; and finally, the third and fourth years, at 40 THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. five dollars. This paid me, because I sent off a great many. But they didn’t hatch well after having been transported away and shaken over in the hands of careless and igno- rant or reckless express agents. Thus the buyers came again. Many of the early fanciers tried this experiment over and over again, but with similar ill-success; and when they had expended ten, twenty, or thirty dollars, perhaps, for eggs, they would begin at the beginning aright, and pur- chase a few chickens to rear, from which they could finally procure their own eggs, and go forward more successfully. But all this took time to bring it about. And meanwhile somebody (I don’t say who) was ‘« feathering a certain nest’ as rapidly as a course of high- minded and honorable dealing with his fellow-men would permnit. CHAPTER VII. ALARMING DEMONSTRATIONS. My premises were literally besieged with visitors, and my family attendants were worn out with answering the door-bell summons, from morning till night. “Ts Mr. B at home? Can we see his Cochin-Chinas? Can we look at Mr. B——’s fowls? Might we take a look at the chickens?’’ were the questions from sun to sun again, almost; and I was absolutely compelled, in self-defence, to send the fowls away from home, for a while, for the sake of relief from the continual annoyances to which, in conse- quence of having them in my yard, I was subjected. Fifteen, twenty, often forty callers ina single day, would come to see my ‘‘ magnificent’ Cochin-China fowls. But I sent them off, and then ‘the people’’ cried for them! ““Who’s dead?” queried a stranger, passing my door one day, and observing the carriages and vehicles standing in a line along the front of my garden-fence. ‘Nobody, I guess,” said another; “that’s where the Cochin- Chinas are kept.” 4* ? 42 THE HISTORY OF ‘The what ?” “The Cochin-Chinas.” “ What’s them?” “ Don’t you know?” “No; never heard of ’em, afore.” ‘‘ Never heard of Burnham’s Cochin-O.inas?’®* ‘« Never! What are they?” “Well, I reckon you ha’n’t lived in these ’ere parts long, my friend,” continued the other; ‘‘and you’d better step in and look at ’em.”’ In came the stranger, and after examining the fowls he returned. : “‘How do you like ’em?” asked the man who had already seen them, and was waiting for his friend outside. “They ’re ronchers, that’s a fact!” exclaimed the grat- ified stranger. And this was the universal opinion. Nobody had ever seen such fowls (I had seen a good many better ones!) — nobody had ever beheld any s0 large, so heavy, so fine. And every one whocame to look at them purchased or engaged either eggs or chickens from these “extraordinary” and ‘‘never-to-be-too-much-lauded ”’ royal Cochin-China fowls ! For my first broods of chickens (at three and four months old) I readily obtained twenty-five dollars a pair; and every one of them went off ‘like hot cakes”’ at this figure. It was too low for them, altogether; and I had occasion to THE HEN FEVER. 43 regi >t subsequently, that I did not charge fifty dollars a pair;-—a price which I might just as easily then have obtained as if I had charged but one dollar a pair, as events proved to my satisfaction. But everything connected with this fever could not well be learned at once. I was not a very dull scholar, and I progressed gradually. One year after the receipt of my Cochins, I got my own price for them, ask what I might. I sold a good many pairs at one hundred dollars the couple ; and, oftentimes, I received this sum for a trio of them. Things begun to look up with me. Ihad got a very handsome-looking stock on hand, at last; and when my numerous customers came to see me, they were surprised (and so was I) to meet with such ‘‘noble” samples of domestic fowls. ‘Magnificent!’ ‘ Astonishing!” cried everybody. A splendid open carriage halted before my door, one day, and there alighted from it a fine, portly-looking man, whom Thad never seen before, and whose name I did not then learn ; who, leaving an elegantly-dressed lady behind in the vehicle, called for me. I saw and recognized the carriage, however, as one of Niles’; and I was satisfied that it came from the Tremont House. As soon as the gentleman spoke, I was also satisfied, from his manner of speech, that he was a Southerner. He was polite and frank, apparently. I invited him in, and he 44 THE HISTORY OF went to look at my fowls; that being the object, he said, of his visit. He examined them all, and said, quietly : “T’d like to get halfadozen of these, if they didn’t come too high; but I understand you fanciers have got the price up. I used to buy these chickens for a dollar apiece. Now, they say, you’re asking five dollars each for them.” I showed him my stock,— the ‘‘pzre-bred’’ ones,— and informed him at once that I had not sold any of my chick- ens, latterly, at less than forty dollars a pair. He was astounded. He didn’t want any — much : that is, he wasn’t particular. He could buy them for five dollars; should n’t pay that, nohow; wanted them for his boy; would come again, and see about it, &e. &c. ' A five-year-old stag mounted the low fence at this moment, and sent forth an electrifying crow, such as would (at that period) have taken a novice “right out of his boots ;”’ and a beautiful eight-pound pullet showed herself ‘beside him at the same time. The stranger turned round, and said : “There! What is your price for such a pair as that, for instance? ”? “* Not for sale, sir.” “ But you will sell them, I s’ pose ?”’ “No, sir. Ihave younger ones to dispose of; but that pair are my models. I can’t sell them.” THE HEN FEVER. 45 The gen:lemin’s eye was exactly filled with this pair of chickens. ‘‘ What will you éake for those two fowls?” “One hundred dollars, sir,” I replied. ‘“T guess you will — when you can get it,’’ he added. — “Name your lowest price, now, for those two. I want good ones, if any.” “T prefer to keep them, rather than to part with them at any price,” I insisted. ‘If, however, a gentleman like yourself, who evidently knows what good fowls are, desires to procure the choicest specimens in the country, why, I confess to you that those are the persons into whose hands I prefer that my best stock should fall. But I will show you some at a lower figure,” I continued, driving this pair from the fence. “Don’t you! Don’t drive ’em away !’’ said the gentle- men; — “let ’s see. That’s the cock?” “ Yes, sir.” ‘* And this is the hen?” te Yes.’ “One hundred dollars! You don’t mean this, of course,” he persisted. “No, I mean that I would rather keep them, sir.”’ “ Well —I’ll take them,” said the stranger. “It’s cruel. But, I’ll take them;” and he paid me five twenty-dollar gold pieces down on the spot, for two ten- 46 THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. months-old chickens, from my “ splendid’? Royal Cochin- China fowls. He had a tender spot somewhere, that I had hit, during the conversation, I presyme. He took the two chickens into hig carriage, and I have never seen or heard from him from that day to this. I trust, however, if ‘‘these few lines’? should ever meet his eye, that his poultry turned out well, and that he himself is in good health and spirits ! I called this gallant young cock ‘‘ Frank Pierce,” in honor of my valiant friend now of the White House, at Washington. It will be seen that I thus sold Frank for fifty dollars; a sum which the majority of the people of this country have since most emphatically determined was a good deal more than he ever was worth ! CHAPTER VIII. THE FEVER WORKING. Axovt this time an ex-member of Congress, formerly from Pennsylvania, was invited to deliver the address before one of the county agricultural societies of that state (where the fever had now begun to spread with alarming rapidity), who, in the course of his speech on that occasion, delivered him- self of the following pointed and forcible remark. Speaking of poultry and the rare qualities of certain domestic fowls, he said, ‘‘ Ladies and gentlemen, next to a beautiful woman, and an honest farmer, I deem a Shanghae cock the noblest work of God!” Now, this expression might be looked upon, by some persons, as savoring of demagogism, or, at the least, as an approach to “ running this thing into the ground” (or into the air); but the honorable gentleman no doubt felt just what he said. I have seen many sensible men who felt worse than this —a good deal — on this self-same subject ; and who expressed themselves much more warmly in regard to the characteristics and beauties of domestic poultry ; but, 48 THE HISTORY OF to be sure, it was after they had ‘“ gone through the mill,” and had come out at the smail end of the funnel. In New England, especially, prior to the second show of poultry in Boston, the fever had got well up to “ concert pitch ;”’ and in New York State ‘“‘ the people ’”’ were getting to be very comfortably interested in the subject — where my stock, by this time, had come to be pretty extensively known. The expenses attendant upon this part of the business, to wit, the process of furnishing the requisite amount of informa- tion for “the people ” (on a subject of such manifestly great importance), the quantum sufficit in the way of drawings, pictures, advertisements, puffings, etc., through the medium of the press, can be imagined, not described. The cost of the drawings and engravings which I had executed for the press, from time to time, during the years 1850, ’51, ’52, and ’53, exceeded over eight hundred dol- lars; but this, with the descriptions of my ‘‘rare’’ stock (which I usually furnished’ the papers, accompanying the cuts), was my chosen mode of advertising. And I take this method publicly to acknowledge my indebtedness to the press for the kindness with which I was almost uniformly treated, while I was thus seriously affected by the epidemic which destroyed so many older and graver men than myself; though few who survived the attack ‘suffered’? more seriously than I did, during the course of the fever. For THE HEN FEVER. 49 instance, the large picture of the fowls which I had the pleasure of sending to Her Majesty Queen Victoria (in 1852), and which appeared in Gileason’s Pictorial, the New Yori: Spirit of the Times, New England Cultivator, &c., cost me, for the original drawing, engraving, electrotyping, and duplicating, eighty-three dollars. All these expenses were cheerfully paid, however, because I found my reward in the consciousness that I performed the duty I owed to my fellow-men, by thus aiding (in my humble way) in disseminating the information which “ the people” were at that time so ravenously in search of, name- ly, as to the person of whom they could obtain (without regard to price) the best fowls in the country. This was what “the people”? wanted; and thus the mal- ady extended far and wide, and when the fall of 1850 arrived, buyers had got to be as plenty as blackberries in August, whilst sellers “of reputation ”’ were, like the visits of angels, few and far between. F was, by this time, con- sidered ‘“‘one of ’em.” I strove, however, to carry my honors with Christian meekness and forbearance, and with that becoming consideration for the wants and the wishes of my fellow-men that rendered myself and my “ purely-bred stock ’’ so universally popular. Ah! when I look back on the past,— when I reflect upon the noble generosity and disinterestedness that characterized all my transactions at that flush period,— when I think of 5 50 THE HISTORY OF what I did for “the cause,” and how liberally I was rewarded for my candor, my honesty of purpose, and my disingenuousness,— tears of gratitude and wonder rush to my eyes, and my overcharged heart only finds its solace by turning to my ledger and reading over, again and again, the list of prices that were then paid me by “‘ the people,” week after week, and month after month, for my ‘“ magnificent samples”? of ‘ pure-bred’’ Cochin-China chickens, the original of which I had imported, and which were said to have been bred from the stock of the Queen of Great Britain. But, the Mutual Admiration ——I mean, the ‘“ Soci- ety ” whose name was like ‘« Lengthened sweetness, long drawn out,’’ was about to hold its second annual exhibition; and, as the number of its members had largely increased, and as each and all of those who pulled the wires of this concern (while at the same time they were pulling the wool over the eyes of “the people”) had plans of their own in reference to details, I made up my mind, although I felt big enough to stand up even in this huge hornet’s nest of competition, to have things to suit my “‘ notions.” I now had fowls to sell! I had raised a large quantity of chickens ; winter was approaching, corn was high, they required shelter, the rowp had destroyed scores of fowls for my neighbors, and I didn’t care to winter over three ox THE HEN FEVER. 51 four hundred of these ‘‘splendid”’ and ‘“‘ mammoth” speci- mens of ornithology, each one of which could very cleverly dispose of more grain, in the same number of months, than would serve to keep one of my heifers in tolerable trim. Such restrictions were proposed by the officers of the Society with the lengthened cognomen, that my naturally democratic disposition revolted against the arbitrary meas- ures talked of, and I resolved to get up an exhibition of my own, where this matter could be talked over at leisure, and which I did not doubt would ‘“ turn an honest penny ”’ into my own pocket; where, though I had done well thus far, there was still room, as there was in hungry Oliver T'wist’s belly, for ‘‘ more.” CHAPTER IX. THE SECOND POULTRY-SHOW IN BOSTON. On the 2d, 3d, and 4th days of October, in the year of our Lord 1850, the ‘grand exhibition” (so the Report termed it), for that year, came off at the large hall over the Fitchburg Railroad Dépét, in Boston, ‘‘ which proved a most extensive and inviting one’ (so continued the Re- port), ‘‘ far exceeding, both in nwmbers and in the quality of specimens offered, anything of its kind ever got up in America. ‘The birds looked remarkably fine in every respect, and the undertaking was very successful. A magnificent show of the feathered tribe greeted the thousands of visitors who called at the hall, and all parties expressed their satis-: faction at the proceedings. “The Committee awarded to George P. Burnham, of Melrose, the first premiums for fowls and chickens. The prize birds were the ‘Royal Cochin-Chinas’ and their progeny, which have been bred with care from his imported ~ THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. 58 stock; and which were generally acknowledged at the head of the list of specimens.”’ The prices obtained at this exhibition ranged very high, and ‘ full houses”? were constantly in attendance, day and evening, to examine and select and purchase from the ‘pure-bred ”’ stock there. ‘‘Mr. Burnham, of Melrose ”’ (continued the Report), “declined an offer of $120 for his twelve premium Cochin-China chickens, and subsequently refused $20 for the choice of the pullets.” ‘The show was much larger than the first one, and the character of the birds exhibited was altogether finer, though the old fowls were, for the most part, moulting. A deep interest was manifested in this enterprise, and it went off with satisfaction to all concerned,’”’ added the Report. In order that the details of this experiment (which I projected and carried through, myself) may be appreciated and understood, I extract from the ‘official’? Report the following items regarding this show, the expenses, the prize-takers, &c. The “ Committee of Judges,” consisting of myself, G. P. Burnham, Esq., and a gentleman of Melrose, made the following statements and ‘‘observations,” in the Report above referred to : “‘The Exhibition was visited by full ten thousand per- sons, during the three days mentioned. The amount of money received for tickets was four hundred and seventy- 5* 54 ” THE HISTORY OF three dollars and thirty-eight cents; and the following disbursements were made :~. Cash paid for rent of hall,. . . . . . . $175.00 ue ‘* amount of premiums and gratuities, 135.00 es ‘“¢ for lumber and use of tables, . . 17.60 at “for lighting hall, advertising, ete.,.. 70.40 “¢ tickets, cards and handbills, . . . 18.21 ue “« carpenters and attendants, . . . 27.50 ef ‘¢ police and door-keepers, . . . . 15.00 ee «¢ grain, seed, buckets, pans, etc... . 25.56 fe “ coops, cartage and sundries, . . . 7.87 Total expenses, . $491.64. Amount received, as stated, 473.38 Deficit, $18.26” When the state of the funds was subsequently more par- ticularly inquired into, however, it was found that the amount of money actually received at the door was a little rising nine hundred and seventy dollars, instead of “ four hundred and seventy-three,” as above quoted. But this, was a trifling matter; since the “‘ Committee of Judges” spoken of above accounted for this sum, duly, in the final settlement. , The ‘‘ Committee” aforesaid awarded the following pre- miums at this show, after attending to the examination con- fided to them— namely : THE HEN FEVER. 55 “ Fl-st premium, for the best six fowls contributed, to George P. Burnham, of Melrose, Mass., $10. ‘For the three best Cochin-China Fowls (Royal), to George P. Burnham, Melrose, Mass., $5. For the twelve best chickens, of this year’s growth (Royal Cochin-China), to George P. Burnham, Melrose, $5.” And there were some other premiums awarded, I believe, there, but by which I was not particularly bene- fited ; and so I pass by this matter without further remark, entertaining no doubt whatever that all the gentlemen who were awarded premiums (and who obtained the amount of the awards) exhibited at the Fitchburg Hall Show pure- bred fowls. After making these awards, the ‘‘ Committee of Judges ” (consisting, as aforesaid, of myself, Mr. Burnham, and a fancier from Melrose) state that ‘they find great pleas- ure”— (mark this !) —‘‘they find great pleasure in alluding again to the splendid contributions” of some of the gentle- men who had fowls in this show,— and then the Report continues as follows: “The magnificent samples of Cochin-China fowls, con- tributed by G. P. Burnham, of Melrose, were the theme of much comment and deserved praise. These birds include his imported fowls and their progeny — of which he exhib- ited nineteen splendid specimens. ‘To this stock the Com- 56 THE HISTORY OF mittee unanimously awarded the first premiums for fowls and chickens; and finer samples of domestic birds will rarely be found in this country. They are bred from the Queen’s variety, obtained by Mr. Burnham last winter, at heavy cost, through J. Joseph Nolan, Esq., of Dublin, and are unquestionably, at this time, the finest thorough-bred Cochin-Chinas in America.” My early hen-friend the ‘“‘ Doctor” — alluded to in the opening chapter of this book — exhibited a fowl which the Committee ”’ thus described in their report : “The rare and beautiful imported Wild India Game hen, contributed by Mr. B. F. Griggs, Columbus, Geo., was a curiosity much admired. This fowl (lately sold by Dr. . J. C. Bennett, of Plymouth, to Mr. Griggs, for $120) is thorough game, without doubt; and her. progeny, exhibited by Dr. Bennett, were very beautiful specimens. To this bird, and the ‘ Yankee Games’ of Dr. Bennett, the Com- mittee awarded a gratuity of $5.” So miserable a Aum as this was, I never met with, in all my long Shanghae experience. It out-bothered the Doc- tor’s famous ‘“ Bother’ems,” and really out-Cochined even my noted Cochin-Chinas! But I was content. J was one of the ‘‘ Committee of Judges.” I had forgot ! This Committee’s Report was thus closed : “Tt has been the aim of the Committee to do Justice to all who have taken an ifterest in the late Fowl Exhibition, THE HEN FEVER. 57 and they congratulate the gentlemen who have sustained this enterprise upon its success.” They did ample justice to this Wild Bengal Injun Hen, that is certain. The Cochin-China trade received an impulse (after this show concluded) that astonished even me, and I am not easily disturbed in this traffic. And I have no doubt that the people who paid their money to witness this never-to-be-forgotten (by me) exhibition, were also satisfied. The experiment was perfectly successful, however, throughout. I forwarded to all my patrons and friends copies of this Report, beautifully illustrated ; and the orders for “‘pure-bred chickens from the premium stock” rushed i in upon me, for the next four or five months, with renewed vigor and spirit. 7 This first exhibition at the Fitchburg Dépét Hall proved to me a satisfactorily profitable advertisement, as I carried away all the premiums there that were of any value to any- body. But then it will be observed that the “ Committee of Judges” of this show were my ‘‘friends.” And, at that time, the competition had got to be such that all the dealers acted upon the general democratic principle of going “for the greatest good of the greatest number.” In my case, I considered the “‘ greatest number ’’ Number One / 4 CHAPTER X. THE MUTUAL ADMIRATION SOCIETY’S SECOND SHOW. In the month following, to wit, on the 12th, 13th and 14th of Noyember, 1850, the second annual exhibition of the Simon Pure Society with the extended title was held at the Public Garden, in Boston. No premiums were offered by the society this year, and there was n’t much to labor for. I was a contributor, and I believe I was elected a member of the Committee of Judges that year. How, Idid not know. At any rate, I wrote the published Report upon the exhibition. A Mr. Sanford Howard was chairman of this committee, if I remember rightly ; and though undoubtedly a very respectable and well-meaning man (if he had not been so, he would n’t have been placed on a Committee of Judges with me, I imagine), this Mr. Howard knew positively nothing whatever in regard to the merits or faults of poultry generally. He had acquired some vague notions about what he was pleased to term ‘‘crested”’ fowls, and five-toed, white-legged, white- plumed, white-billed, white-bellied Dorkings,— of which THE HISTORY OF IHE HEN FEVER. 59 he conversed technically and learnedly; but as to his knowledge of the different varieties and breeds of domestic poultry then current, and their characteristics, it was evi- dently warped and very limited. But Mr. Howard had been connected for some months with a small monthly publication in New York State, and, tike myself, I presume, among the board (God knows who they were, but J don’t, and never did!) who originally chose this ‘‘ Committee,” he had ‘‘a friend at court,”’ and was made chairman of the committee too,— how, I never knew, either. In their Report, the Committee observe, again, that “never in this country, if in the world, was there collected together so large a number of domestic fowls and birds as were sent to this exhibition, probably; and, though the most liberal arrangements were made in advance, it was found that the accommodations, calculated for ten thousand specimens, were entirely insufficient. The Committee merely allude to this fact to show the actual extent of this enterprise, and the importance which the undertaking has assumed, in a single year from the birth of the Association. “ According to the records of the Secretary, there were contributed to the Society’s exhibition of 1850 some four hundred and eighty coops and cages. There were in all over three hundred and fifty contributors ; in addition to 60 THE HISTORY OF which about forty coops, containing some six hundred fowls, were sent to the Garden and received on exhibition upon the two last days of the Show; and which could not be recorded agreeably with the regulations made originally. “The palpable improvement in the appearance of the fowls exhibited in 1850, as compared with the samples shown in 1849, offers ample encouragement to breeders for further and more extended efforts ; and your Committee would urge it upon those who have already shown them- selves competent to do so much, fo go on and effect still greater progress in the improvement of the poultry of New England.” This Report (the second of the series) did my stock ample justice, I have not a doubt. I wrote it myself, and in- tended that it should do so. The text was in nowise changed when printed, and a reference to the document (for that year) will convince the skeptical — if any exist — whether I was or was not acquainted with adjectives in the superlative degree ! A very singular occurrence took place about this time, the basis of which I did not then, and have never since, been able to comprehend, upon any principles of philoso- phy, economy, business, benevolence, or even of sanity. But I am not very clear-headed. In the addenda to my Report (above named) there ap- peared the anexed statement, by somebody : THE HEN FEVER. 61 “The Trustees refer to the followi:g with mixed pride and pleasure; the munificence and motive of the gift are most creditable. A voluntary kindness such as that of Mr. Smith is a very gratifying proof that the labors of the Society are not regarded by enlightened men as vain: “ Boston, 12th February, 1851. “GW. Surry, Esa. “‘Srr: A meeting of the Trustees of the ‘ New England Society for the Improvement of Domestic Poultry ’ was held last evening, Col. Samuel Jaques, President of the Society, in the chair, and a full quorum being present, when the Treasurer announced the receipt of your very handsome donation of one hundred and fifty dollars in aid of the Society’s funds ; whereupon it was moved, and unanimously agreed, that the most grateful thanks of the Society were justly due to you for such a munificent testimony of your desire for its prosperity ; that the Secretary communicate to you the assurance of the high appreciation with whith the donation was received; and that its receipt, and also a thankful expression of gratitude towards you, should be placed on the records of the Society. “T can only reiterate the sentiments contained in my in- structions, in which I fully and gratefully concur; and, with best wishes'for your long-continued welfare, “Tam, sir, very truly yours, “Joun C. Moorn, Rec. Secretary.” Now, it will be observed that this was not John Smith who presented this sum, but another gentleman, and a dif- ferent sort of individual altogether. He gave it (one hun- dred and fifty dollars in hard cash) the full value of a nice 6 62 THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. pair of my best “ pure-bred’”? Cochin-Chinas, without flinching, without any fuss, outright, freely, ‘‘in aid of the Society’s funds.” Liberal, generous, benevolent, ‘charitable, kindly Mr’ Smith! ‘You did yourself honor! You were one of the kind of men that I should very much liked to have had for a customer, about those days. But, after due inquiry, I as- certained that you did not keep, or breed, poultry. You were only a “‘ friend”’ to the Society with the elongated name,— the only friend, by the way, it ever had! Heaven will reward you, Mr. Smith, sooner or later, for your disinter- estedness, but the Society never can. Be patient, however, and console yourself with the reflection that he who giveth to the poor, lendeth, &c. &c. The Society with the long- winded title was poor enough, and you cannot have forgot- ten that he who casteth his bread (or money) upon the waters will find it, after many days. You will find yours again, I have no doubt; but it will be emphatically ‘ after many days.” The second show closed, the expenses of which reached the sum of one thousand and twenty-seven dollars eighteen cents, and the receipts at which amounted to one thousand and seventy-nine dollars eighty-four cents, exclusive of the above-named donation. The Society had now a balance of two hundred and two dollars sixty-six cents in hand, and it went on its way rejoicing. THE SHANGHAE REFERRED TO IN LETTER NO. 177— (See page 80.) 64 P THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. Cot. Jaquzs (the first President) now “resigned his commission,” and Moses KimBatt, Esq., was chosen in his stead. I found myself once more among the Vice Presi- dents, John C. Moore was elected Secretary, Dr. Eben Wight was made.Chairman of the Board of Trustees, and H. L. Devereux became Treasurer for the succeeding year. These officers were all ‘ honorable men,” who were thus placed in position to watch each other! The delightful consequences can readily be fancied. What my own duties were (as Vice-President) I never knew. I supposed, how- ever, that, as “one of ’em” thus elevated in official rank, I was expected to do my uttermost to keep the bubble float- ing, and to aid, in my humble way, to maintain the infla-. tion. And I acted accordingly ; performing my duty “as T understood it” ! SOCULTY CHAPTER XI. PROGRESS OF THE MALADY. IMMEDIATELY after this second exhibition, the sales of poultry largely increased. Everybody had now got fairly under weigh in the hen-trade; and in every town, at every corner, the pedestrian tumbled over either a fowl-raiser or some huge specimen of unnameable monster in chicken shape. I had been busy, and had added largely to my “ supe- rior ’’ stock of ‘‘ pure-blooded ” birds, by importations from Calcutta, Hong-Kong, Canton and Shanghae, direct. In two instances I sent out for them expressly, and in two or three other instances I liad obtained them directly from on shipboard, as vessels arrived into Boston and New York harbors. T was then an officer in the Boston Custom-house,— a’ democrat under a whig collector,— otherwise, a live skinned eel in a hot frying-pan. But I found that my business had got to be such that I could not fulfil my duty to Uncle Sam and attend appropriately to what had now got to be 6* a * 66 THE HISTORY OF of very much greater importance to me; and:so I resigned my situation as Permit Clerk at the public stores, very much to the regret of everybody in and out of the Custom- house, and especially those who were applicants for my place ! I had purchased a pretty estate in Melrose, and now I enlarged my premises, added to my stock, and raised (dur- ing the summer and fall of 1851) over a thousand fowls, upon my premises. This did not begin to supply the de- mands of my customers, however, or even approach it. And, to give an idea of my trade at that period, I will here quote a letter from one of my new patrons. It came from the interior of Louisiana, in the fall of 1851. “Gro. P. Burnuam, Ese., Boston. “Tam about to embark in the raising of poultry, and I hear of yourself as an extensive breeder in this line. Do me the favor to inform me, by return mail, what you can send me one hundred pairs of Chinese fowls for, of the yellow, red, white, brown and black varieties; the cocks to be not less than eight to ten months old, and pullets ready to lay ; say twenty pairs of each color. And also state how I shall remit you, in case your price suits me, &c. 6c 0) I informed this gentleman that I had just what he wanted (of course), and that if he would remit me a draft by mail for fifteen hundred dollars — though this price was really too low for them —I would forward him one hun- THE HEN FEVER. 67 dred pairs of fowls ‘‘ that would astonish him and his neigh- bors.” Within three weeks from the date of my reply to him, I received a sight draft from the Bank of Louisiana upon the Merchants’ Bank, Boston, for fifteen hundred. dollars. I sent him such an invoice of fowls as pleased him, and I have no doubt he was (as he seemed to be) per- fectly satisfied that he had thus made the best trade he ever consummated in the whole course of his life. During the next spring I bred largely again, and sup- plied all the best fanciers in New England and New York State with stock, from which they bred continually during that and the succeeding year. In the spring of 1852 the Mutual Admiration Society of hen-men got up their ¢hird show, at the Fitchburg Dépét (in May, I think), where a goodly exhibition came off, and where there were now fowls for sale of every con- ceivable color and description, good, bad, and indifferent. I contributed as usual, and, as usual, carried away the palm for the best samples shown. And here was eyinced some of the shifts to which certain hucksters resorted, to make ‘‘the people” believe that white was black, that they originally brought this subject before the public eye, and that they only possessed the pure stock then in the country. Reverends, and doctors, and deacons, and laymen,— all were there, in force. Every man cried down every other man’s fowls, while he as strenuously cried up his own. Upon 68 THE HISTORY OF one cage appeared a card vouching for the fact that a cer- tain original Shanghae crower within it, all the way from the land of the Celestials, weighed fourteen pounds and three ounces, and that a hen, with him, drew nine pounds six ounces (almost twenty-four pounds). When the birds were weighed, the first drew ten and a half pounds, and the other eight and a quarter only. This memorandum ap- peared upon the box of a clergyman contributor, who had understood that size and great weight only were to be the criterion of merit and value thenceforward. Another con- tributor boldly declared himself to be the original holder of the only good stock in America. A third claimed to be the father of the current movement, and had a gilded vane upon his boxes which he asserted he had had upon his poultry- house for five years previously. Another stated that all my fowls (there shown) were bred from fis stock. And still another proclaimed that the identical birds which I con- tributed were purchased directly of him; he knew every one of them. Finally, one competitor impudently hinted that my birds actually then belonged to him, and had only been loaned to me (for a consideration) for exhibition on this occasion ! When the fair closed, however, the matter was all set right, as may be gathered from the following extract from the official Report of the third show, of the Committee of Judges of which I was not a member : THE HEN FEVER. 69 ‘ At this third Boston Show,” says the Committee, ‘‘ the best and most faultless descriptions of Red and Buff Shang- haes were shown by G. P. Burnham, Esq., and others. And of the Cochin-Chinas, the specimens of Geo. P. Burn- ham, ete., were each and all notable, and worthy of public appreciation.”” This was satisfactory to me, and I made the most of this “‘werry fav’rable opinion” of the august Committee,— who added the following, in their Report, in reference to the action of Southern purchasers : “Tt seems, from reliable information received by mem- bers of the Committee, that fowls raised in New England, and exported South, attain to a much larger size, and are vastly more prolific, than in our colder climate. This is specially so in reference to the produce of stocks recently im- ported from the Hast, namely, the Shanghaes, Cochin-China fowls, and others of larger varieties. So sensible have some of the most eminent Southern breeders become that such is the case, that they are annually in the habit of buying their young stock from the Northern States, and they find the system profitable. In this way, New Eng- land bids fair to become the supply-market, in a great measure, for the South and West.” This was beautiful! ‘‘ Annually in the habit.” I liked that portion of it. And Southern buyers seemed to like it, too, judging from the manner in which orders poured in upon us, after this gentle hint from swch authority! I believe that the Chinese fowls really did better in the South than they did with us, this way. At least, I hope they did! CHAPTER XII. MY CORRESPONDENCE. By this time my correspondence with gentlemen in all parts of America and Great Britain had got to be rather extended. I took from the post-office from ten to twenty-five or thirty letters, daily; and amongst them were some curi- ous samples of orthography, etymology, syntax, and prosody. I offer the annexed specimens — of course without names or dates — merely to show how the young aspirants for fame (in the poultry-trade) felt, about those days; and, also, to give some idea of the progress of the fever among us, as time passed by, etc. ete. No. 1. Siz — Mr. BuRNHAM ; -i red in Nu england poultry breeder that yu kep fouls an aigs for sail. iwant one duzen aigs if tha doant cum tu tu mutch. ime a poor mann an carnt pa a gret THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. 71 pris. wot can yu cend me a duzen of yure best aigs for. ansur by male and direck yure leter tu me tu mi dress. Yr Respec’y, &e. No. 2. My Dear Sir: I am a poor clergyman, and I have some leisure, which I can devote to raising a few good fowls. If your price is not too high for the rather limited contents of my purse, please inform me, by return of mail, what you can furnish me with pure Cochin-China eggs for. I am desirous . to procure a few; and I prefer that you would select for me,— in a half-dozen, say two male and four female eggs. I suggest this, because I am informed that your long expe- rience in this interesting branch of rural economy has enabled you to decide (upon examining them) whether eggs will produce cocks or pullets. Your early answer will con- fer a favor on, Sir, yours, truly, No. 3. Mr. Burman: I close you ten dolls. Cend me a doz. of your Cotchen Chiny eggs rite away — cause I hav a hen thats been a setting on some stones I put under her now most a week. You rote me that you would hav them about this %2 THE HISTORY OF time, you know. Cend them by ’3 Express, and tell the man who fetches them not to turn the box over, at all. I want half and half— that is to say, half cock eggs, and half hen eggs. You know what I mean by this. Them that has the sharp ends on to one side — them’s the cocks, and them that’s round and smooth at both ends — them ’s the hens. Forwud immediately, and mark with care glass this side up — don’t shake this with speed. Yours, &c. No. 4. G. P. Burnuam, Eso. Dear Sir: I saw your beautiful Cochin-China fowls last week, in the paper, and am desirous to obtain a few eggs from them, if possible. Will they hatch under our common hens? Or, must we have the pure bloods to sit upon them? Iam a novice, somewhat, in this business. I enclose you twelve dollars (the price for a dozen, I believe), which please forward, at your early convenience, by express, and oblige Yours, &e. No. 5. Friend BuRNHAM: Enclosed please find ten dollars for another dozen of your pure Cochin-China eggs. The first ones you sent THE HEN FEVER. 78 me (from some cause) did not hatch. I have kept a hen (a very good sitter, too) upon that first lot, constantly, for four weeks, now — and I don’t believe I shall get a chick, you see! So, please forward these now, right away — because my hen will get tired of waiting, you know, if I don’t keep her right along, steady. The $10 you will find within. Yours, resp’y, P. S. Can you inform me what is good for dice on fowls? I find that my hen is covered with a million of them, now. Don’t forget this, please.* No. 6. ‘Sur — wen i cum to boston nex weak i want to see yure poltry iam a ole hand at the bizness myself an I like to see good kinds of poltry every ware. i see yurn in the paper an i like them verry much can yu sel a hen without a cock, i have sevral cocks now of the black dawkin pure bred and fine an i would change one of them with yu for a cochon chiner hen if yu say so. answer by fust male. . Yure in haist Mr. P. G. Barnum, boston. * After a hen had set over four weeks on her nest, I should suppose she : might have been thus affected ! T 74 THE HISTORY OF No. 7. * Dear Sir: Yours duly received. I did not suppose that the price of the ‘‘ Cochins ” was so high — but I must have a trio of them, at any figure. I enclose you fifty dollars for them, agreeably with “your proposal, relying upon your known good taste in selections, and upon your proverbial reputation as regards the keeping only of pure stock. Send them by Adams & Co.’s Express, in a roomy cage. If they are prime, my neighbors will very shortly order from you, I am sure. 4 ’ Yours, resp’y, No. 8. Mr. BaRNnaM : Them two fowls I bought of you, by seeing the pictur in the newspaper, and which I paid you $35 cash down on the nail for, aint what they ’re cracked up to be — not by a long short, sir. Now, what I want you to do is to sen me back my munney, or I’l] prosecute you and put you in prizon for cheating people by false pertences. I was so mad when I took them out of the box that I’d a good mine to kill an eat em both on the spot.* I aint no hen- man, I’d have you to understan, an you can’t come none of this kine of nonsense over me. Sen me back my mun- ney, or I’ll complain of you in tu days before a Justis of * O, the cannibal ! # “Well, take him. He ’s worth twenty dollars; but you shall have him for ten dollars, being an old friend.” The doctor placed the huge crower in his gig immedi- ately, went home, killed off two of the finest Dorking roosters in the county, and put the new comer into his nice poultry-house; congratulating himself upon having at last secured a ‘‘ tip-top breeder,” and nothing else. At the end of the season, however, he complained to his friend the lawyer that he had had but very few eggs lat- terly ; he could raise no chickens from them — not a one ; and he didn’t think much- of the ten-dollar bird he pur- chased of him, any way. “He’sa rouser, Bill, surely,” said the lawyer, with a knowing smirk, repeating the doctor’s exclamation on first beholding the rooster. vai “Well, yes — large, large—but—’.. i44 THE HISTORY OF “And a finer capon I never sold to anybody in my life!” “A what!” screamed the doctor, springing - towards his. horse, which stood near by. ai “ What’s the price of b’iled eggs, Bill?” roared the lawyer, in reply. “Ten dollars a dozen, by thunder!” was the answer, as the doctor drove his rowels into the sides of his nag, and dashed away from his friend’s gate a wiser if not’ a better man. Many amateur poultry-raisers resorted to the most ridiculous and injurious shifts for remedies against the ills that hen-flesh is heir to. I have known certain friends who passed two or three hours every morning in running about their fowl-premises with pill-box and pepper-cup in hand, zealously dosing théir drooping chickens, to their certain’ destruction. And some of the “‘ doctors” went into jalap, in cases of colds, fevers, &o., in their fowls. We should as soon think of using arsenic, or any other poison, under such’ cireumstances. The internal formation of a hen is scarcely’ believed to resemble that of a human being, surely; and why such medicinal applications, pray? This reminds’us of a private joke, by the way, ‘that was ‘Jet out” by a young fancier (out West) a little while ago. He had a bad cold ‘himself, and had mixed “ summat hot” to.swallow, one evening. His servant informed him THE HEN FEVER. 145 that his favorite Cochin-China crower had been ill for a day or two; and he ordered twenty grains of jalap to be pre- pared for his fine bird. By some mistake his toddy was given to the crower, and he swallowed the hen-medicine himself, and retired to bed. - He slept soundly for a time, but was visited with shock- ing dreams. He fancied himself to be a huge rooster— one of the biggest kind; that he had taken all the premiums at all the shows, and that he had finally been set to hatch over a bushel of Shanghae eggs. It was the twentieth day, at last, and the chickens commenced to come forth from their shells beneath him. He dare not move,—his fowl- cure was at work,— and his critical position, for the time being, can be better imagined than portrayed. With a des- perate effort, and a shrieking crow, he at length sprang from his couch, dashed out of doors, and, since the day after- wards, has resolved to eschew the use of jalap among his poultry,— a determination which, in all candor, we recom- mend earnestly to the hen-Galens who imagine that a hen is ‘¢a human.” . It had now become an every-day occurrence to hear of black chickens emerging from what were “warranted ”’ pure white fowls’ eggs; top-knot birds peeped forth from the eggs of pure-bred anti-crested hens; and all colors and e shapes and varieties of chickens, except those that they 18 146 THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. were purchased for, made their appearance about the time of hatching the eggs so bought. All the old-fashioned fowls were utterly discarded. Co- chin-Chinaism, Shanghaeism, Bother’em Pootrumism, was rampant. The fancy egg-trade had ‘begun to fall off sen- sibly ‘The people” had had enough of this part of the enterprise, which was destined to prove so “immensely profitable,” if ‘judiciously and skilfully managed ;” and the price was reduced to the miserable sum of three to five dollars a dozen, only, as customers chanced to turn up. From the commencement of the trade, in 1849, down to the month of August, 1853, I had a continued and certain sale, however, for every egg deposited upon my premises, at my price. But this, though an exception, was not to be wondered at. J kept and raised only the “ genuine’’ article. CHAPTER XXII. TRUE HISTORY OF ‘‘ FANNY FERN.” I was riding through Brookline, Mass., one fine after- noon, on my round-about way home from a fowl-hunting excursion in Norfolk County, when my attention was sud- denly attracted by the appearance and carriage of the most extraordinary-looking bird I ever met with in the whole course of my poultry experience. I drew up my horse, and watched this curiosity for a few minutes, with a fowl-admirer’s wonder. It was evidently a hen, though the variety was new to me, and its deportment was very remarkable. Her plumage was a shiny coal- black, and she loitered upon a bright-green bank in the sunshine, at the southerly side of a pretty house that stood a few yards back from the road. She was rather long- legged, and “‘ spindle-shanked,’”’ but she moved about skip- pingly and briskly, as if she were treading upon thin egg- shells. Her feet were very delicate and very narrow, and her body was thin and trim; but her plumage — that glossy, jet-black, brilliant feathery habit —was ‘‘too much ” for my * 148 THE HISTORY OF then exo ted “‘ fancy ” for beautiful birds ; and I thought I had never seen a tip-top fowl before. As I gazed and wondered, this bird observed me coquet- tishly, and, raising herself slightly a tip-toe, she flapped her bright wings ludicrously, opened her pretty mouth, and sent‘ forth a crow so clear and sharp, and so utterly defiant and plucky, that I laughed outright in her face. I did. I could n’t help it. . She noticed my merriment, and instantly flap went those glittering wings again, and another shout— a very shriek of a crow, a termagant yell of a crow— rang forth pierc- ingly from the lungs of my sable but beautiful inamorata. — This second crow was full of fire, and daring, and chal- lenge, and percussion. It seemed to say, as plainly as words could have uttered it, ‘‘Who are you? What you after? Would n’t you like to cage me up — s-a-y?” I laughed again, wondered more, stared, and shouted “ Bravo! Milady, you are a rum ’un, to be sure!” And again she hopped up and crowed bravely, sharply, mali- ciously, wildly, marvellously. I was puzzled. I had heard of such animals before. I had read in the newspapers about Woman’s Rights con- ventions. I had seen it stated that hens occasionally were found that ‘crowed like a cock.” But I had never seen one before. This was an extraordinary bird, evidently. There it went again! That same shrill, crashing, chal- THE HEN FEVER. lenging crow, from the gullet of the ebon beauty before me. 0, what a crow was that, my countrymen! I re- solved to possess this bird, at any cost. And I was soon in communication with the gentleman who then had her. “Ts this your hen, sir?” I inquired. And I think the gentleman suspected me, instanter. “Yes,” he answered. ‘ That is, I support her.” “Will you sell her?” ~ “* No — no, sir.” “T will give you ten dollars for her.”’ Crack! Crash! Whew! went that crow, again. was electrified. “Tl give you fifteen ——” ‘ “No, sir.” “Twenty dollars, then.’’ (73 No.”’ ; “ What will you take for her?” “Hark!” he replied. ‘‘Isn’t that music? Isn’t that heavenly ?” “What is that? ” I asked, eagerly. «My hen.” * What is she doing?” * Singing,” said the gentleman. “Beautiful!” I responded. ‘‘I will give you forty dol- lars for her.” ; “Take her,” replied her keeper. ‘She is yours.” 18* 150 THE HISTORY OF ‘* What breed is it?” I inquired. ‘ Spanker,”’ said the gentleman, “but rare. It is one of Ellett’s importation — genuine.” ‘‘ Remarkable pullet!” I ventured. “Hen, sir, hen,” insisted the stranger. I paid him forty dollars down, and seized my prize, though she proved hard to catch. ‘‘ She ’s much like the Frenchman’s flea, sir,” said her previous possessor. ‘‘Put your finger on her, and she’s never there. Feed her well, however, keep her in good quarters, let her do as she pleases, and she’ll always crow —always, sir. Hear that? You can’t stop her, unless you stop her breath. She always crows and sings. There it is again! Isn’t that a crow, for a hen — eh?” It was, indeed. “Good-day,”’ said the Brookline gentleman, quietly pocketing his money. ‘‘ Fanny will please you, I’ve no doubt.” “Fanny ?”’ I queried. “Yes; I call her ‘ Fanny Fern,’” said thé stranger to me, as I entered my wagon; and, half an hour afterwards, my forty-dollar cock-hen, ‘Fanny Fern,’ was crowing again furiously, lustily, magnificently, on the bright-green ‘lawn beneath my own parlor-windows. “Fanny” proved a thorough trump. Bantams, Games, Cochins, Dorkings, Shanghaes, Bother’ems, were nowhere THE HEN FEVER. 151 when “Fanny” was round. She could outcrow the lustiest feathered orchestra ever collected together in Christendom. She was a wonder, that redoubtable but frisky, flashy, sprightly, sputtery, spunky ‘‘ Fanny Fern.” And didn’t the boys run after her? Well, they did! And didn’t they want to buy her? Didn’t they bid high for her, at last? Didn’t everybody flock to see her, and to hear ‘‘ Fanny” crow? And didn’t she continue to crow, too? Ah! it was heaven, indeed (and sometimes the other thing), to listen to ‘‘ Fanny’s”’ voice. When “ Fanny” opened her mouth, everybody held their breath and listened. “Fanny” crowed to some purpose, verily! She crowed lustily against oppression, and. vice, and wrong, and injustice; and she crowed aloud (with her best strength) in behalf of injured innocence, and virtue, and merit, exalted or humble. . And, finally, “Fanny” hatched a brace of chickens; and did n’t she crow for and over them? She now cackled “and scratched, and crowed harder and louder and shriller than ever. , The people stopped in the street to listen to her ; old men heard her; young men sought after her; all the women began to ‘‘swear” by her; the children thronged to see her; the newspapers all talked about her; and thou- sands of books were printed about my charming, astonishing, remarkable, crowing ‘“‘ Fanny Fern.” I sent her to the fowl-shows, where she ‘“ took ’em all ‘ 152 THE HISTORY OF down” clean, and invariably carried away the first pre- mium in her class. Never was such a hen seen, before or since. I was offered a hundred, two hundred, five hundred dollars for her. Iwas poor; but didn’t I own this hen ‘“‘Fanny,’’ — the extraordinary, wonderful, magnificent, coal- black, blustering, but inapproachable and world-defying “Fanny” ? “T will give you eight hundred dollars for her,” said a publisher to me, one day. ‘‘I want to put her in a book. She’s a wonder ! a star of the first magnitude! a diamond without blemish ! a God-send to the world in 1854!” At this moment “ Fanny” crowed. “Will you take eight hundred?’ screamed the pub- lisher, jumping nearly to the ceiling. | “No, sir.” “ A thousand ?” “Ne? “ Two thousand ?”” “No, sir.” “« Five thousand ?”’ “No! I will keep her.” And I did. What was five thousand dollarstome? Bah! Thad the hen-cock ‘“ Fanny Fern.” I didn’t want money. ° My pocket-book was full to bursting, and so was my head with the excitement of the hen fever. And “Fanny” crowed again. Ah! what a crow was Fanny’s!” . THE HEN FEVER. 158 “Fanny” couldn’t be bought, and so my competitors clanned together to destroy her. The old fogies did n’t like this breed, and they resolved to annihilate all chance of its perpetuation. I placed her in better quarters, where she would be more secure from intrusion or surprise. I told her of my fears,— and didn’t she crow? She flapped her bright black wings, and crowed all over. ‘‘ Cock-a-doodle- doo —oo—oo!’’ shouted “Fanny,” while her sharp eyes twinkled, her fair throat trembled, and the exhilarating tone of defiance seemed to reach to the very tips of her shining toe-nails. ‘‘ Cock-a-too —roo — oo !”’ she shrieked; ‘let ’em come, too! See what they’lldo—oo! I'll take care of you—oo! Don’t get inastoo—oo! Pooh—pooh — poo — poo!” Maybe “Fanny” didn’t crow! And I learned to crow. It was beautiful! She crowed, and I crowed. We crowed together. She in her way,—Iin mine. The duet was mellifluous, cheering, soul-stirring, life-invigorating, profitable. “Fanny” went into New York State, crowing when she left, crowing as she went, and continuirg to crow until she crowed the community there clear through the next fourth o’ July, out into the fabled millenium. She crowed Messys. Derby & Miller into a handsome fortune, and Mason & Brothers into ditto. She crowed one Hyacinth into the shreds of a cocked hat and battered knee-buckles. She 154 THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. crowed the Hall breed of old hens so far out of sight that the ‘search for Sir John Franklin ’’ would be a fool to the journey requisite to overtake that family. And still she crowed. The more they bade her stop, the more she would n't. ** Cock-a-tootle ~— too!” ‘ I-know-what-J-shall — doo !” ‘¢ What-do-I-care-for — yoo?” ‘‘ This-world-is-all — foo- foo.” “ Leave-me-and-I’ll-leave — you.” ‘Tf-not-I’ll- lamm — you — Too — 00 !”” And “ Fanny ” crowed herself at last into the good graces of two long brothers in Gotham, where she is now crowing with all her might and main. Let her crow! She was a remarkable “ bird,’ that rollicking, joyous, inexplicable, flirting, funny, furious “‘ Fanny Fern.” I hear her now again ! “ Cock—Aa—DooDLE — poo— oo!” “Young ’Un,— you-will-do!!" “ H¢—¢tu— Brute — 0-0-0!!!” CHAPTER XXIII. CONVALESCENCE. One striking feature that exhibited itself in the midst of this mania, was the fact that prominent among the lead- ing dealers in fancy poultry, constantly appeared the names of clergymen, doctors, and other ‘‘liberally-educated’’ gen- tlemen. In Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, and most of the Hast- ern States, this circumstance was especially noticeable; and more particularly in England. Whether this class of the community had the most money to throw away, or whether, their leisure afforded them the better opportunity to indulge in this fancy, I cannot say; but one thing is certain,— among my own patrons and correspondents, for the past five or six years, I find the names of this class of ‘‘ the people” by far the most conspicuous and frequent. There came into my office, one morning late in 1853, a Boston physician (whom I had never seen before), who introduced himself civilly, and invited me to ride a short distance with him up town. I was busy; but he 156 THE HISTORY OF insisted, and his manner was peculiarly urgent and deter- mined. “My carriage is at the door,” he said; ‘and I will bring you back here in twenty minutes. I have some pure- blood stock I desire to dispose of.” “« What zs it, doctor?” I asked. ‘¢ Chickens, chickens !’’ replied the doctor, briefly. I assured the gentleman that I had near a thousand fowls on hand at this time, and had no possible wish to increase the number. ‘They are pure-bred — cost me high,” he continued ; ‘are very fine, but I must part with them — come!” I joined him, and we rode a mile or more, when he halted before a fine, large house; his servant in waiting took his horse, and he ushered me into his well-appointed poultry- house, at the rear of his dwelling. The buildings were glazed in front and upon the roofs; the yards were spacious and cleanly, and appropriately divided; the laying and hatching rooms were roomy and convenient; the roosting-house was airy and pleasant, and everything was, seemingly, in excellent order, and arranged with good taste throughout. “That cock cost me twenty dollars,’ said the doctor, calmly. ‘Those two hens I paid eighteen dollars for. That bird, yonder, twelve dollars. These five pullets stand me in about forty-five dollars. Ihave never yet been able THE HEN FEVER. 157 to hatch but one brood of chickens. The rats carried them off by the third morning after they came into this world. The hens sometimes lay, I believe; at least, my man says so. I have never seen any eggs from them myself, however. I have no doubt this species of fowls (these Changays) do lay eggs, though. There are twenty-two of them. Buy them, ,” continued the doctor, urgently. T said no; I really did not want them. “T had nigh forty of them,” continued the doctor, “‘ two months ago. But they have disappeared. Disease, roup, vermin, night-thieves, sir. Will you buy them? John —— drive them out!” The fowls were driven into the main yard. There were but sixteen in all. “‘ Where are the rest, John?’’ inquired the doctor, anxiously. ‘‘ There were twenty-two here yesterday.” “T dunno, sir,’”’ said John. “ Drive ’em back, and box them up, oo Mr. B—, will you make an offer for the remainder? To-morrow I shall probably have none to sell! Will you give anything for them?” I declined to buy. “Will you permit me to send them to you as a present, sir?” he continued. I did not want them, any way. I had a full supply. “ What will you charge ‘me, Mr. B , to allow them 14 158 THE HISTORY OF to be sent to you?” continued the fancier, desperately. and resolutely, at last. I saw he was determined, and I took his fowls (fifteen of them), and gave him ten dollars. He smiled. ‘“‘J have had the hen feyer,’”’ he added, “ badly — but I am better of it. Iam convalescent, now,” said the doctor. “You see what I have here for houses; cost me over seven hundred dollars; my birds over four hundred more; grain and care for a year, a hundred more. I am satisfied! Your money, here, is the first dollar I ever received in return for my investment. You see what I have: left out of my venture of twelve or thirteen hundred dollars; the manure, and — and — the lice!” Such were the exact facts! His stock was selected from the Marsh and Forbes importations, and the birds were good ; bat, by the time he got ready to believe that it wasn’t all gold that glittered, the sale of ¢his variety of fowl had passed by. A chance purchaser happened to come along soon after, however, who ‘‘hadn’t read the papers’’ so attentively as some of us had, and who wanted these very fowls. I sold them to him, ‘cheap as a broom,” because the fever for this kind of bird was rapidly declining. He - paid me only $150 for this lot; which was a bargain, of a truth. The buyer was satisfied, however, and so was J. These were but isolated instances. Scores and hundreds THE HEN FEVER. 159 of gentlemen and amateur fanciers found themselves in a similar predicament, at the end of one or two or three years Without possessing a single particle of knowledge requisite to the successful accomplishment of their purpose,— utterly ignorant of the first rudiments of the business,— they jumped into it, without reason, forgetting the wholesome advice contained in the musty adage, ‘look before you leap.” And, after sinking tens and hundreds or (in some cases) thousands of dollars in experiments, they woke up to find that they had had the fever badly, but, fortunately, were at last convalescent ! I was busy, all this time, in supplying my friends with “* pure-bred”’ stock, however, and had very little leisure to tarry to sympathize with these ‘poor crecturs.”’ The demand for my stock continued. and the best year’s busi- ness I ever enjoyed, was from the spring of 1853 to May and June, 1854; when it commenced to fall off very sensi- bly, and the prospect became dubious, fdr future operations, even with me. CHAPTER XXIV. AN EXPENSIVE BUSINESS. Durine the past six years I have expended, outright, for breeding stock, and for appropriate buildings for my fowls, over four thousand dollars, in round numbers — without taking into the account the expenses of their care, and the cost of feeding. Few breeders have spent anything like this sum, for this purpose, strictly. In the mean time, the aggregate of my receipts has reached (up to January, 1855) upwards of severity thousand dollars. I have raised thousands upon thousands of the. Chinese varieties.of fowls, and my purchases to fill orders which came to hand during this. term — in addition to what I was able to fill from those I myself raised —have been very large. And, while I have been thus engaged, hundreds and hundreds of amateurs and fanciers have sprung up in various directions, all of whom have had their skare, too, in this trade. To the fanciers — those who purchased, as many did at first, simply for their amusement, or for the mere satisfaction THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. 161 of having good, or, perhaps, the best birds —this fever proved an expensive matter. I have known amateurs who willing- ly paid- twenty, fifty, or a hundred dollars, and even more, for a pair, or a trio, of what were considered very choice Shanghaes. These fowls, after the first few weeks or months of the purchaser’s excitement had passed by, could be bought of him for five or ten dollars a pair! Yet, his next- door neighbor, who would not now take these identical birds for a gift, scarcely, would pay to a stranger a similarly extravagant amount to that which had a hundred times been. paid by others before him, for something, perhaps, inferior in quality, but which chanced to be called by the most pop- ular name current at the moment. Thus, for a time, bubble number one, the Cochin- Chinas, prevailed. The eggs of these fowls sold at a dollar each, for a long period. Then came the Shanghaes, of different colors,— as the yellow, the white, the buff, or the black,— * and took their turn. Many thousands of these were disposed of, at round rates. The smooth-legged birds at first com- manded the best price; then the feathered-legged. And, finally, came the Grey Shanghaes, or ‘‘ Chittagongs,” ox ‘‘ Brahmas,” as they were differently termed; and this proved bubble number two, in earnest. Everybody wanted them, and everybody had to pay for them, too! They were large, heavy fowls, of China blood, plainly, but, with some few exceptions, were indifferent 14* 162 THE HISTORY OF birds. They were leggy, however, and stood up showy and tall, and, to look at, appeared advantageously to the fancy, at this veriod. In the maw of this bubble, thousands of good dollars were thrown; and no race of poultry ever had the run that did these Greys, under various names, both in this country and in England. A most excellent Southern trade had sprung up, and large shipments of fowls went forward to the West, from Massa- chusetts, and to Charleston, Augusta, Mobile, New Orleans, etc., where the fever broke out furiously, and continued, without abatement, for three years or more. No buyers were so liberal, generally, and no men in the world, known to Northern breeders, bought so extensively, as did these fanciers in New Orleans and vicinity. They purchased largely, from the very start; and the trade was kept up with a singular vigor and enterprise, from the be- ginning to the end. Orders, varying in value from $500 to $1200 and $1500, were of almost weekly occurrence from that region; and in one instance, I sent forward to a gentle- man in Louisiana, a single shipment for which he paid me $2230! This occurred in September, 1853. In this same year, I sent, from January to December, to another gentleman (at New Orleans), over ten thousand dollars’ worth of stock. The prices for chickens ranged from $12 @ $15 a pair, to. $25.or $30, and. often $40 to #50, a pair. These rates THE HEN FEVER. 163 were always willingly and freely paid, and the stock was, after a while, disseminated throughout the entire valley of the Mississippi; where the China fowls always did better than in our own climate. It proved an expensive business to some of these gentle- men, most emphatically. But they always paid cheerfully, promptly, and liberally; and knew the Yankees they were dealing with, a good deal better than many of the sharpers supposed they did. For myself, I shall not permit this opportunity to pass without expressing my thanks to my numerous and generous Southern patrons, to whom I sent a great many hundred pairs of what were deemed ‘‘ good birds,” and to whom I am indebted,-largely, for the trade I enjoyed for upwards of five years. I sincerely hope they made more money out of all this than I did; and I trust that their substance, as well as “their shadows, may never be less.’ During this year, and far into 1854, the current of trade turned towards Great Britain; and John Bull was not very slow to appreciate the rare qualities of my ‘‘ magnificent ”’ and ‘‘ extraordinary” birds; ‘the like of which,” said a London ‘journal, when the Queen’s fowls first arrived, ‘‘ was never before seen in England.” For upwards of a year, I had all ¢his trade in my own way. Subsequently, some of the smaller dealers sent out a few pairs to London, but “the people ” there could never 164 THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. be brought to believe those fowls were anything but mon- grels; and, while these mterlopers contrived to murder the trade there, they at the same time “‘ cut off their own noses,” for the future, with those who knew what poultry was, upon the other side of the Atlantic. I had my shy at the Britons, seasonably ! But, a few months afterwards (as I shall show in a future chapter), through the mismanagement of an ambitious dealer in other fancy live-stock, the trade with England, from this side of the water, was completely ruined. Over two hun-' °° dred American fowls were thrown suddenly upon the London market, and were finally sold there, at auction, for a very small sum; and we were subsequently unable (with all our chicken-eloquence) to make John Bull believe that even the Grey Shanghaes were any longer “scarce” with us, here! CHAPTER XXV. ° THE GREAT PAGODA HEN. THE most ‘idiculous and fulsome advertisements now occupied the columns of certain so-called agricultural papers in this country, particularly one or two of these sheets in New York State. Stories were related by correspondents (and endorsed by the nominal editors), regarding the proportions and weights and beauties of certain of the ‘‘ Bother’em ” class of fowls, that rivalled Munchausen, out and out. Fourteen and fif- teen pound cocks, and ten or eleven pound hens, were as common as the liars who told the stories of these impossibil- ities. And one day the following capital hit, by Durivage, appeared in a Boston journal. He called it ‘The Great Pagoda Hen.” There is as much truth in this as there was in many of the more seriously-intended articles of that time. It ran as follows: ‘‘Mr. Sap Green retired from business, and took posses- sion of his country ‘villa,’ just about the time the ‘hen faver’ was at its height ; and he soon gave evidence of hay- 166 THE HISTORY OF ing tkat malignant disorder in its most aggravated form. He tolerated no birds in his yard that weighed less than ten pounds at six months, and he allowed no eggs upon his table that were not of a dark mahogany color,.and of the flavor of pine shavings. He supplied his own table with poultry, and the said poultry consisted of elongated drum- sticks, attached by gutta-percha muscles and catgut sinews to ponderous breast-bones. He frequently purchased a ‘crower ’ . for a figure that could have bought a good Morgan horse ; but then, as the said crower consumed as much grain as a Morgan horse, he could not help being perfectly satisfied with the bargain. His wife complained that he was ‘ mak- ing ducks and drakes ’ of his property ; but, as that involved a high compliment to his ornithological tastes, he attempted no retort. He satisfied himself that it ‘would pay in the end.’ His calculations of profits were ‘clear as mud.’ He would hay3a thousand hens. The improved breeds were warranted to lay five eggs apiece a week; and eggs were worth — that is, he was paying — six dollars a dozen. His thousand hens would lay twenty thousand eight hundred and thirty-three dozen eggs per annum, which, at six dol- lars per dozen, would amount to the sum of one hundred and twenty-four thousand nine hundred and ninety-eight dollars. Even deducting therefrom the original cost of the hens and their keep,— say thirty-six thousand dollars,— the _very pretty trifle of eighty-eight thousand nine hundred and THE HEN FEVER. 167 ninety-eight was the remainder—clear profit. Eggs — even dark mahogany eggs — went down to a shilling a dozen! But we will not anticipate. ‘To facilitate the multiplication of the feathered species, Mr. Green imported a French Eccaleobion, or egg-hatching machine, that worked by steam, and was warranted to throw off a thousand chicks a month. ° ‘One day an ‘ancient mariner’ arrived at the villa, with a small basket on his arm, and inquired for thé ‘master of the house. Sap was just then engaged in important busi- ness,— teaching a young chicken to crow,— but he left his occupation, and received the stranger. ‘«¢ Want to buy an egg ?’ asked the mariner. ‘““*Qne egg? Why, where did it come from?’ asked the hen-fancier. ‘««E Stingies,’ replied the mariner. ‘** Domestic fowl’s egg?’ ‘* « Domestic.’ “¢ Tet ’s see it.’ ‘The sailor produced an enormous egg, weighing about a pound. Sap ‘hefted’ it carefully. ““*Did you ever see the birds that lay such eggs?’ he asked. “¢ Lots on ’em,’ replied the sailor. ‘They ’re big as all put-doors. They calls ’em the Gigantic Pagoda Hen. I’m afeared to tell you how big they are; you won't 168 THE HISTORY OF believe me. But jest’ you hatch out that ’ere, and you'll see wot’ll come of it.’ “But they must eat a great deal?’ said Sap. . ‘«“ Scarcely anything,’ replied the mariner; ‘that’s the beauty on ’em. Don’t eat as much as Bantams.’ ‘*¢ Are they good layers?’ “** You can’t help ’em laying,’ replied the seaman, enthusiastically. ‘They lay one egg every week-day, and two Sundays.’ ““¢ But when do they set?’ queried Green. “*¢ They don’t set at all. They lays their eggs in damp, hot places, and natur’ does the rest. The chicks take keer of themselves as soon as they ’re out of the shell.’ Damp, hot place!’ said Sap. ‘My Eccaleobion is the very thing, and my artificial sheep-skin mother will bring ’em up to a charm. My friend, what will you take for your egg ?’. ‘** Cap'n,’ said the mariner, solemnly, ‘ if I was going to stay ashore, I would n’t take a hundred dollars for it; but, as I’ve shipped ag’in, and sail directly, you shall have it for forty.’ “The forty dollars were instantly paid, and the hen- fancier retired with his prize, his conscience smiting him for haying robbed a poor, hard-working sailor. ‘QO, how he watched the egg-hatching machine while that extraordinary egg was undergoing the steaming pro- THE HEN FEVER. 169 cess! He begrudged the time exacted by eating and sleep- ing; but his vigils were rewarded by the appearance, in due time, of a stout young chick, with the long legs that are a proof of:Hastern blood. The bird grew apace ; indeed, almost as rapidly as Jack’s bean-stalk, or the prophet’s gourd. But the sailor was mistaken in one thing; it ate voraciously. Moreover, as it increased in size and strength, the Pagoda exhibited extraordinary pugnacity. It kicked a dozen comrades to death in one night. It even bit the hand of the feeder. Soon it was necessary to confine it in a separate apartment. Its head soon touched the ceiling. What a pity it had no mate! Sap wrote to a correspond- ent at Calcutta to ship him two pairs of the Great Pagoda birds, without regard to cost. Meanwhile he watched the enormous growth of his single specimen. He kept its ex- istence a profound secret. It was under lock. and key, in a separate apartment, lighted by a large window in the roof. Sap’s man-of-all-work wheeled daily two bushels of corn and a barrel of water to the door of the apartment, and Green fed them out when no one was looking. Even this supply was scanty ; but, out of justice to his family, Sap was compelled.to put the monster bird on allowance. «Poor thing!’ he would say, when he saw the creature devouring ‘broken glass, and even bolting stray nails and gravel-stones, ‘it cuts me to the soul to see it reduced to such extremity. But it’s eating me rut of house and home. 15 170 THE HISTORY OF Decidedly, that sailor-man must have been deceived about their being moderate feeders.’ “When the bird had attained to the enormous altitude of six feet, the proud proprietor sent for the celebrated Dr. Ludwig Hydrarchos, of Cambridge, to inspect him, and furnish him with a scientific description, wherewith he might astonish his brethren of the Poultry Association. The doctor came, and was carefully admitted by Green to the presence of the Great Pagoda Hen. The bird was not accustomed to the sight of strangers, and began to manifest uneasiness and displeasure at seeing the man of science. It lifted first one foot and then the oes as if it were tread- ing on hot plates. a “ All orders for my famous ‘ Bramerpootrers,’ or my imported ‘ Chinese Mandarin Hogs,’ etc., must be put in water-proof condition, post-paid, endorsed by the collector of this port, and sent, by Adams & Co.’s Express, to Nia- gara Falls, until I conclude to remove to Salt Lake, Nebraska, or ‘elsewhere,’ of which due notice will be given (provided I don’t decide to ‘step out’ between two days). Adios ! Yours, “The Youne ’Un. “‘ Boston, Jan., 1854.’ Now, the above letter explains itself fairly, upon its face ; yet — would it be believed? —I actually received four or five sober (I presume the writers were sober) letters of inquiry, relating to the ‘curious and remarkable Chinese Mandarin Hog in my possession,” immediately after the above article appeared in the Spirit! Such are the knowledgé and acquirements of ‘‘the people,’’ in certain quarters, upon the subject of live stock ! @ CHAPTER XXXYV. “HOLD YOUR HORSES.” My competitors in the hen-trade, by this time, had got to be exceedingly active and zealous, though they rarely indulged in personalities towards me, at all. Generous, disinterested, liberal, kind-hearted, valiant men! Provi- dence will reward you all, I have no doubt, some day or other ! The following article, which appeared in a “‘respectable”’ agricultural sheet (which, though I was solicited so to do, E neither subscribed for nor advertised in), I offer here as a sample of the puffs that were extended to me for five years, by the small-fry humbugs whom I rarely condescended to notice. This ‘elegant extract ’’ appeared in a northern Farmer : “We did suppose that the strait-jacket we fitted to this fellow (Burnham) would be worn by him, but it ap- pears that, on reading our article relative to his movements in England in regard to Grey Shanghae fowls, he cast it off, and made an attempt to put us hors du combat, in his usual style. 238 THE HISTORY OF “But we raust say that his pretensions to being an ‘ém- porter’ of these fowls, to having the ‘original’ stock, to being the importer of the fowls he sent to England, is the greatest deception that ever came under our observation. But this is only in character with the general transactions of the man. In his dealings generally he seems to have had no other object in view but to get all he could for his fowls, with no regard to their merits. This is shown by a letter of his, which we have in our possession, written in 1852 to Dr. Bennett, in which he uses the following lan- guage, in regard to fowls: ‘Anything that will sed/,— bah !? “We will take the liberty to digress a moment, to make a few remarks on his penchant for the use of the expression ‘bah!’ which is his common habit in correspondence. When Burnham was a loafer at large, previous to his foul specu- lations, it is said that he was very fond of mutton; and as many a fat lamb was missed in the vicinity where he re- sided, it was more than suspected that he knew what became of them. Whether this be so or not, it seems that ‘bah’ is ever escaping from his lips, a judgment, as it were, for the alleged imiquity of disturbing the nocturnal peace of that uiet animal. * * * * ‘“‘ Now, friend Burnham, do be civil and honest. Your having sold ‘premium’ Cochins all over the country, with the real ‘premium’ fowls in your own yard, will soon be forgotten, and you may yet be considered a clever, honest fellow ; but you must stop pretending to be an ‘importer’ of fowls.” I was thus charged with putting my “friend” hors du combat, with lying generally, with sheep-stealing, with selling “‘ premium” fowls over and over again, as well as with striving to get all I could for my poultry,— this last offence being the most heinous of all! But, as I lived THE HEN FEVER. 239 | (as I supposed I should) to seo this cub and his allies on their knees to me (as I could show, if I desired to do so, now), I did not mind these first-rate notices. They were most decidedly of miner consideration in my esteem, when I thought how “the people” crowded around me to obtain eggs or samples of my famed ‘imported,’ ‘“supe- rior,” ‘‘magnificent’’ and ‘ never-to-be-too-much-lauded ” pure-bred fowls ! In the official Report upon the first New York show, the Committee of Judges there state that, ‘though they have been governed by the nomenclature of the list, they by no means assent to it as a proper classification. Shanghae and Cochin- China are convertible terms, and Brahma Pootra is a name for a sub-variety of Shanghaes, of great size and beauty. White Caleuttas and Hong-Kongs were not on exhibition. Believing them to be inferior specimens of White and Black Shanghaes, it is likely that we would not have awarded them premiums, if found. In lieu thereof, we have assigned several additional second premiums for Brahma Shanghaes. “For the sake of simplicity, we would recommend that all thorough-bred large Asiatic fowls be classed under the name of Shanghae, to be further designated by their color; and, inasmuch as these. shows are intended not solely for the aggrandizement of breeders, but for the purpose of converting ‘Henology’ into a science, we would earnestly 240 THE HISTORY OF suggest that all ridiculous, unmeaning aliases be abandoned, and a simple, intelligible and truthful classification strictly observed.” After quoting. this, the writer above alluded to objects to the recommendation to call all Asiatic fowls Shanghaes, notwithstanding the action of the Committees of the National Society. He insists : ‘‘ This is a rididulous affair, and we call on fowl-breed- ers to veto this nonsense at the outset. Just imagine what a ridiculous figure breeders would cut in calling their fowls ‘Brahma Shanghaes,’ ‘ Chittagong Shanghaes,’ &e. ! Why this desire to overturn established names? It arises from a prejudice against the name ‘ Brahma Pootra,’ and a desire to put down that popular breed. Again: Who are the gentlemen who recommend such a course? Why don’t they give their names? These ‘recommendations’ and ‘ resolutions’ are no more the act of the National Poultry Society than of the Emperor of Russia! Where were the forty MANAGERS when the above ‘resolution’ was passed? We, as one, were not there; and we learn that not over three out of the entire number were present, and that the resolution was passed by outsiders, and, perhaps, influenced to do so by G. P. Burnham, of ‘Grey Shanghae’ noto- riety. This clown even ‘regrets that he did not attend this show ;”’ as if it would have made a difference in the result ! Well, well !— the impudence and ignorance of some people really astound us, at times! He says “some of the best Brahma Pootra fowls were entered ‘ Chittagongs.’ Now, we declare emphatically that the desire on the part of cer- THE MEN FEVER. 941 tain breeders to class the Brahmas as identical with the Chittagong fow] is absurd; and we assert that no man can produce any evidence that the Brahmas are identical with Chittagongs, beyond the fact that many breeders have pro- duced mongrels, by crossing Brahmas with Chittagongs, and now seck to amalgamate the two breeds.” Who ever wished to ‘ produce any evidence” on this subject, pray? ‘The people” wanted fowls ; they never sought for ‘ evidence,” man! The breeder who could ‘* produce’? fowls was the man to succeed in the hen-trade. As you never did this, and only bought and sold wretched mongrels, with long names, you never succeeded. And ‘the people ”’ said, ‘‘ Served you right !”’ This sapient editor then declares that he ‘‘ doubts the ability of any Poultry Society to maintain its existence permanently, for the reason that such societies will, sooner or later, degenerate into mere speculating cliques, and the premiums will become,a matter of darter, or a matter of favor to particular men, like the operations of our govern- e ment.” Is it possible! When did you discover this extraordinary and singular fact, my dear sir? Not until the close of the year 1854! After the cars had long since passed by, and the fun was over, effectually and forever, in this country. Your warning was valuable, indeed! ‘The colt nad left the stable, and you now come to fasten the door! 0, chief of 21 242 THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. prophets in Henology ! how much “the people” :we 7ou for your advice and foresight in this hum ! This writer finally thus wriggles over the action of the “National”? Society at New York, which knocked his “¢ Bother’ems ’’ on the head so effectually, substituting their true name (the “ Grey Shanghaes ”) for this ridiculously assumed cognomen. He continues: : The most absurd thing which came under our observa- tion at the fair was the classification of certain fowls. There were the beautiful white Brahmas, with pencilled neck hackles, placed by the side of fowls of an owl or hawk color, and both classed ‘ Grey Shanghaes!’ How long will a few old fogies thus stultify themselves? Many exhibitors were highly displeased with this absurdity. They who think that the name of Brahma fowls can be changed to ‘Grey Shanghaes’ have entirely mistaken their ability to make such an innovation. What did all the nonsense in the resolutions passed at the National Poultry Show in New bar about the nomenclature of fowls effect? Just nothing at all.’ ; Indeed! Didn’t it? Is it possible? You don’t say so ! My dear friend, you have a great deal to learn yet ; and I here advise you, affectionately and lovingly, and with an ardent desire for your present and future good, to— ** hold your horses ! ”” CHAPTER XXXVIl. TRICKS OF THE TRADE. Povttry exhibitions had been or were now being held all over the country. In the New England States, in New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia, numer- ous fairs had come off, at which the customary competition among breeders of fancy poultry had been duly shown ; and for a time, yet, out of Massachusetts, the fever still raged, though with comparative abatement. It was now a common thing, and certain men were in the habit of visiting the express offices, and examining coops of fowls, and taking the names of the persons to whom they were directed, and then writing them that they would furnish such fowls at a much cheaper rate. This occurred, gener- ally, while the stock was en route to its destination ; but it never disturbed me. Among the Rhode Islanders (who, by the way, generally speaking, have raised the best of all the Chinese varieties of fowls, for five years past) a feeling of desperate rivalry had grown up. At the Providence shows, many of the 244 THE HISTORY OF choicest specimens ever seen among us were exhibited and disposed of at high rates. But the management of the fairs there was not satisfactory to certain breeders, who, unfor- tunately, and naturally, drove rather ‘too slow coaches ”’ to keep pace with a few of the leaders in the traffic there, as will be seen by the following exposé, which I find in the shape of an advertisement in the Woonsocket Patriot : In a report published subsequently. to this State Fair in Rhode Island, the Committee on Poultry at the exhibition held there in the fall of 1854 awarded their first premium to the chairman of the committee. The second premium was awarded to another man, who had just as good fowls, probably, but who was n’t smart enough to ‘‘ keep up”’ with his competitor. The person who came out thus second-best, only, at once charged, through the public prints, that an attempt had been made by the chairman thus “‘ to hoodwink the public” in their future purchases (which was very. likely, because it was a very common matter). The injured party says, in his published ‘“ card,”— **No doubt Mr. © was ready to grasp at the ap- pointment as the committee, and he was progressing in the examination, when I remonstrated, and had two other men added to the committee with him, supposing that justice would then be administered to the parties concerned. But Mr. C was determined to have the sole arrangement of the report, contending with the other two upwards of five hours, aggrandizing to himself the first premium, and THE HEN FEVER. 245 then affixing to the committee’s report the name of Mr. A , instead of his own, to deceive the public, that he was not interested. Mr. C intended that justice should not be done his competitor, by withholding his right as to the first premium; and I challenge him to an impartial exhi- bition of the poultry (although some of his number were borrowed), for the sum of one hundred dollars, to be de- cided by three disinterested men.”’ Another member of this committee then states that, “being one of the Committee on Poultry at the late State Fair, held in Providence, R. I., and having seen the report of the same, I feel it my duty to say that such was noé the decision of the committee. Two were in favor of giving to decided to award a premium of twelve dollars to ; the first premium; as we could not agree, we also the same to Mr. C——, provided each were repre- sented equal in the report.” Now, this was a very trifling affair to trouble the public with, yet it shows ‘“‘ how the thing was done.” Mr. C had a happy way of “laying ’em all out,” when J was not in the field. If the advertisements ‘‘ to the public” were paid for duly (and I presume they were), I have no doubt the public are satisfied; and Mr. must keep his eyes open tight, if he trains in company with , the ified party, experienced hen-men. ‘This is but ‘a part of the system,” man ! Now, as this sort of thing was of very common occur- rence among the hucksters who kept the hen-trade alive, for 21* 246 THE HISTORY OF years, this was in nowise a matter of astonishment to the “hard heads’? in the business. ‘The only wonder was that the man who performed ¢his trifling trick did not carry out the dedge more effectually, and bear away al/ the premiums in a similar manner, as had been done by some of his smarter predecessors ! The editor of 2 New York journal undertook as follows to “inform the public’ (in 1854) of a little performance in kind, which had been common for several years at these fairs where ‘‘ premiums” were awarded, and which proved a very profitable mode of operation, almost from the very beginning of fowl-shows in the United States. In an article upon a recent exhibiuion, under the caption ‘t How the Cards are Played,” he says: “A fowl-breeder, hy extraordinary means, raises a few specimens of fowls of great size, which he takes to the exhibition; and, on the appearance and character of those few specimens, he contracts to furnish fowls and eggs of the ‘same stock.’ He goes home with his pockets full of orders, and with not a single fowl, for sale, in his posses- sion at thditime, and hastens to purchase of A, B and ©, such fowls as he can find, say at $8, $5-to $10 a pair, which he sends to fill his-orders at $20 to $50 a pair, and no nearer in value to the stock that appeared on exhibition than a turkey i is toa turkey buzzard! The same of eggs. Noy. ,, there are exceptions to this aliewaaon but we KNow THE HEN FEVER. QAT that such thirgs are done, and we think that the public should be put on their guard.” Thets is no question about the accuracy of this statement. The writer says he “‘ Avows that such things were done ;”’ and I feel sure that no man in New York State ever knew the details of this dodge so well as he did. It was a yery common thing everywhere, howeyer, among the hucksters. I had no occasion to resort to this plan; for the game we played was a deeper one, altogether. There was a ‘‘live Yankee,’”’ all the way from Rhode Island, who attended the New York show, who took the boys down there after the following style. as appears from another advertisement, which I recently met with, and which “feat is thus described by one of the sufferers. Ina ‘gard ’’ published soon after that exhibition, this victim of misplaced confidence says, with a show of seeming injured innocence : “ Justice to the public, as well as myself, demands a slight explanation of a few facts connected with the recent National Poultry Show, in New York City. “Mr. C , of Woonsocket, R. I, accompanied me to New York for the purpose of attending the fair. On the fourth day of the exhibition it was announced that the judges were about to commence their labors. Mr. C . ‘seeing that his chance for a premium of any kind on Asiatic fowls was very slim, came to me and requested, nay, ven insisted, on grounds of mutual friendship, that I should put my two best hens with a cock of his, for the purpose of taking the first premium. I finally consented, with the ex * 248 THE HISTORY OF press understanding,.and no other, that we should each share the honors and proceeds equally. On Friday it was announced, in the lecture-room, that Ae had taken the first premium on the best pair of Asiatic fowls, of whatever sub- variety. I went to him, at once,.and expressed my dissat- isfaction, and reminded him of his agreement. He then agreed to see the secretary and all the reporters, and pub- lish, or cause to be published, a card, stating that I was equally entitled to the premium with himself, as the hens were raised by me; and he furthermore agreed that his name should not be mentioned or published, in relation to the premium, except in connection with my own. How was that agreement fulfilled? On taking up one of the New York dailies the next morning, I was surprised to see a puff laudatory of Mr. C , while my name was not alluded to,— which puff, report says, was paid for with a rooster. On my return home, a few days afterwards, I found that he had volunteered to make: the following assertions: ‘ Well, T have laid’em all out. I took the first premium on every- thing, best pair and all, and I can beat the world.’ When: asked how it was done, he said, ‘I will tell you, some time, how. Iplayed my card.’ ” But Mr. C——, with that reserve and indifference peculiar to gentlemen in the hen-trade who have accem- plished a ‘‘ neat operation,” did not see fit to explain the process, and hesitated to inform his ‘friend’? how he played his card. And so the aggrieved party resorted to the newspaper, and come the “‘power of the press”’ upon Mr. C , as follows: “Mr. C—— stated that my stock was ‘mongrel,’ and inferior. Whether it beso or not, is for the thousands and THE WEN FEVER. 249 tens of thousands who saw them, while on exhibition, to judge. After selecting two of my best hens for Mr, C——’s especial benefit (as it appears), the committee even then saw fit to award me a premium, while his two coops of ‘ pare, full-blooded Asiatic fowls,’ which he had cracked up so loud and extensively, did not receive, as I can learn, even a passing notice, except the old cock, which was put in the coop with my ‘mongrel hens,’ as he is pleased to call them. Perhaps the public would also be gratified to learn the manner in which he obtained the first premium at the recent Agricultural Fair in Providence, R. L Was it not done by entering several coops of fowls, belonging to another person, in his own name, Without that person’s knowledge and consent, and pointing out those fowls to one or more of the judges, representing them as his own? No doubt the books of the society, and those of the railroad corporation which conveyed Mr. C ’3 poultry to and from the fair, if compared, will throw some light upon the subject. Is not this the manner in which he has frequently played his card; or, in other words, ‘laid ’em all out’? As [have always treated him asa gentleman, a neighbor and friend, to what cause can I impute this low, mean contemptible and underhand manner of exalting himself at my expense? Iwould advise him, in conclusion, to peruse Msop’s moral and instructive fable of the ambitious Jackdaw, and’ learn from that, that however well a course of decep- tion and duplicity may at first prosper, the day of exposure and disgrace will come, and the ungainly Jackdaw, stripped of his ill-gotten plumage, will stand forth in all his native blackness and deformity.” Now, I have no doubt, that this Mr. C——, when he read the above “card” (which must have cost its author considerable time and money), felt very badly about it, the 250 THE HISTORY OF more especially as the show-prizes had been duly announced, and he had the premium-money safely in his own pocket! And it certainly must have been a very gratifying circum- stance, to the man who had been thus duped, to see his ad- vertisement thus in print, too. Had I been similarly situ- ated, however, after losing my premium and the credit that belonged to my having had the best fowls on exhibition, also (only by thus joining issue with another to gull the “dear people ’’), I rather think I should not have published the facts, to show,myself up a fool as well as a knave. But this is merely a matter of taste. Mr. B——-, who signs this ‘‘ card,” will scarcely be caught in this way again. We “live to learn.” Mr. B—— had not become apprised of the fact that, from the very commencement, the hen-trade was a huge gull, possessing an unconscionable maw, and most incon- ceivable powers of digestion. Older heads and wiser men than he had been duped or swallowed by this monster, that stalked about the earth for six long years, seeking whom he might devour. If this is the worst treatment he ever ex- perienced at the hands of those who helped to feed the vampire, Mr. B—— is, indeed, a fortunate man. ‘There be those who would gladly exchange places with this gentle- man, and give him large odds. C was smart. Ihave known him for several years. He is one of the few ‘‘ hen-men” whom I would trust alone THE HEN FEVER. 251 with my purse. And whether he raised them, or purchased them, it matters nothing; he has sold some of the best fowls in America. In all human probability, the author of the “card”? last quoted will live long enough (unless he shall have already stepped out) to know that “‘the people” went into the hen- trade blindfolded, and that the bandages have now dropped from their eyes. He will have ascertained, too, I think, that a resort to the newspapers for redress against such of his “friends”? as may get ahead of his time in this way is precious poor consolation, when he reflects that advertise- ments cost money, and that the anathemas of an over- reached chicken-man have never yet been known to harm anybody — as far as heard from! Selah! CHAPTER XXXVII. FINAL DEATH-THROES. » Tue officers and the fos at the poultry-fairs Ge of whom are self-constituted), as will be seen, usually carried away all the first prizes. Ata late show of the New York State Society, the president thereof received about one third of all the premiums awarded, and yet his fowls were nearly all second and third rate, and not one of them, it was stated, was bred by him. He may have breil a few specimens during last season, but not one on exhibition was bred by him. The people and certain greenhorns were astonished to see the way in which the premiums were awarded to him. One of the judges there seemed deter- mined to award to him every premium. that his influence could secure, right or wrong; and, from what was learned from exhibitors, it did. look very much like an exist- ing understanding between the parties in regard to the premiums. : For the above stitoment we have the authority of a huck- ster.in New York, who did of. obtain any premiums, and THE HISTURY OF THE HEN FEVER. 2538 who says of the management of the state show there, that this sort of partiality shown in favor of the wire-pullers ‘ is the rock on which the ‘New England Poultry Society’ foundered; and our state society is treading in the foot- steps of its ‘illustrious predecessor.’ ” This writer contends that the president of the New York society, who thus received about all the premiums at one of their late shows, was a man of too much discernment not to see that such a farce as some of the judges played would redound to his discredit. They went too far —over- did the matter ; hence the universal indignation of exhibitors. And then concludes that ‘‘poultry-societies generally merge into mere speculating gatherings, a few receiving most of the premiums, while the uninitiated exhibitor is made a tool to swell the income of those who pull the wires. Many breeders exhibit solely for the sake of the notoriety that their fowls will receive, —a sort of gratuitous advertising,” —and it is now got to be ‘‘ notorious that an order sent to one who receives the first premium for fowls is no more likely, in many cases, to be filled with any better fowls than if sent to one who took no premium at all; as the prize fowls are not often for sale, and very inferior specimens are sent when orders are received.” This information would have answered very well, had it been afforded years ago. Now that the fever has disap- peared almost entirely, and now that everybody has been 22 254 THE HISTORY O¥ gulled, and gouged, and gorged, with the fulsome and glow- ing accounts of the asserted reality of this thing, from the pen of this very man among the rest, it comes rather late in the day for such an one to “‘ warn the people,” and in such a manner ! But, soon after the exhibition above referred to had closed, the president of the society issued a most astound- ing “card,” declining to receive the premiums awarded him, and in which appears the following sentence : ‘“‘In connection with the report of the Judges of the late State Poultry Show, allow me to make a statement. _As appears from the report, my birds have been unusually successful in the contest for premiums, sixteen out of twenty distinct varieties exhibited being so honored. This was more than I expected, and more than I honestly think they deserved. And I am strongly of opinion that, had they had more time, they would have come to a different ‘conclusion, in two or three cases.” I was prepared for almost anything in the hen-trade, up to this time ; but this performance really astonished me! The man actually refused to take the premiums awarded him! He even went so far as to show the “judges”? who ought to have had the prizes, rather than himself. And he actually sent back to the committee the money they forwarded to him after the exhibition was over ! ! _..Now, if this were not sufficient to astonish “the THE HEN FEVER. 255 people,’ I am very much in error regarding the ordi- nary strength of their nerves. It was an almost immac- ulate performance; and the ‘New York State Poultry Society’ should positively insist that this extraordinary man (if he can be proved to be sane) should at once accept from them one of the largest-sized leather medals, to be worn next to his gizzard, for this unexampled disinterestedness, and extraordinary sacrifice of self. O, but ¢hat gentleman must be “a brick,” indeed! A journal that alluded to this singular circumstance, at the time, asserted that this procedure on the part of the president ‘‘ was highly commendable in the author, if his statements were made through principle, rather than through fear to encounter public opinion. He stands high in the estimation of the public, and we have ever considered ‘him as strictly honorable in all his business transac- tions; but we cannot help thinking that ‘ascrew was loose’ somewhere in the matter. His statements are not very flattering to the judgment of the judges, and show that some of them, at least, were not competent to dis- charge their duties properly,” etc.; while, in my opin- ion, than this, a more barefaced piece of mush was never yet perpetrated, in the details even of the hen- trade. : This was emphatically among the ‘‘death-throes ”’ of the .mania. And cards like the following found their way- into 256 THE HISTORY OF = the newsyapers, about this time, in further proof that the valye of this huge balloon had slipped oyt. An ambitious Westerp, man says : “T have long been expecting to hear of the swindling operations of a certain dealer, who makes a great display of pretending to haye every breed known or bred’ in this country ; and, to my certain knowledge, buys all, or nearly all, of his fowls, as wanted, and as many on credit as he can, but.does not pay, nor can the law reach him to make him pay. I believe, also, that the papers that advertise for him are doing it for nothing — that is, that they are not, and never will be paid for it. 4 ‘ Such a course, in my opinion, is no better than high- way robbery; and I hereby give said person fair warning to act honestly hereafter, or I will point him out in a way that shall not be misunderstood, as I cannot see such rascality perpetrated, and remain silent. ‘A man who deals in high-priced fowls, in receiving pay in advance, has his customers completely at his mercy, especially when he is not responsible for a copper; and at the rates that fowls sell for—say, from ten dollars to one hundred dollars a pair— purchasers should receive what is promised them,— good specimens of the puze breeds. So far as weight 1s concerned, a pair of fowls will fall off @ few pounds in a journey of a week or less, in a cramped condition, and perhaps without food for a por- tion of the time; ‘but in other respects justice should be done to the confiding purchaser.’ s : Beautiful ! — poetical! — musical!’ This advertiser, 1 have no doubt, keeps only pure stock. I do not know who he.is; but, if I wanted to buy (which I don’t), I should certainly apply to such an honest and justice-loving person, THE HEN FEVER. 257 because I should feel assured, after reading such an adver- tisement, that ¢hat man was a professor of religion; and, even if he had the chance, would never fleece me — over the left ! Other fanciers, in their utter desperation (as the fever 80 positively and now rapidly begun to decline), resorted to the printing of the pedigrees of their stock; and the following advertisements made their appearance late in 1854 : “« By the influence of Mr. Ellibeth Watch (editor of the London Polkem Chronicler, and uncle to the Turkish Bashaw with three long tails), I have just procured a few of Prince Albert’s famous breed of ‘ Windsor fowls.’ In a letter to me of the 32d day of April, Mr. Watch observes : ‘I have positively ordered a trio of Windsor Fowls of Prince Albert, for you. It is THE BEST BREED IN Ene- LAND, and they are much run after, and cannot be., had without giving previous notice; but you are safe to have yours. Ihave engaged a friend to choose yours for you; and I consider it a great thing to get them direct from the Prince, for you must be aware that persons generally can- not exactly pick and choose FROM THE PRINCE’S OWN stock. I shall employ an efficient person to have them shipped, etc.’ ”’ In due time this remarkable stock arrived in America, and their pedigrees were duly published ;' the advertiser being. “‘ thus particular,” because (as he asserted) ‘ there 22* 288 THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. had been so much imposition upon the public by irresponsi- ble persons claiming to have made importations” ! Now I never entertained the slightest objections to this sort of advertisement,— not J, i’faith! On the contrary, [ deem all this kind of thing very excellent, in its way, to be sure. The moré the merrier. ‘‘The people” want it, and let them have it, say I. But, at the same time, though the ‘ Porte-Monnaie I owe ’ems”’ declare that their unrivalled stock comes from Prince Albert’s yards, I feel very well assured that all this is @ mere guy, it being very well known that His Royal Highness is not engaged in the hen-trade particularly, and of course hag something else to do besides supplying even the “‘ Porte-Monnaie Company” with his pigs and chiekeng, It was a rare undertaking, this importing live stock (with any expectation of selling it) in the fall of 1854! But we shall goon see who were the final victims of the “* fever.”? CHAPTER XXXVIII. THE PORTE-MONNAIE I OWE ’EM COMPANY. It has been said, with much of truth, that ‘two of a ” calling rarely agree;” and this applies with force to those engaged in the ‘“‘hen-trade.’’ Messrs. Mormann and Humm, whom I have before spoken of, could n’t long agree together, and their “dissolution”? soon appeared; and, from the ashes of the professional part of this firm, there suddenly arose an entirely new dodge, under the big-sounding title of “HB PORTE-MONNAIE I OWE "EM COMPANY.” The presiding genius of this concern was one Doctor Bangit,— an old friend of mine, who had been through wars enough to have killed a regiment of ghouls, who was among the earliest advocates and supporters of the ‘‘ New England Mutual Admiration Society,” who was one of the very first physicians employed in prescribing for the hen fever in this country, and who, I supposed, had had sufficient experience not to embark (at this late day) in such a ridiculous enter- prise as this so clearly seemed to be. 260 THE HISTORY OF But the doctor saw his victims in prospective, probably ; and, though he had run the hummery of the fowl-fever so far into the ground that, in his case, it would surely never know a day of resurrection, still he was ambitious and hopeful; and he flattered himself (and some others) that the last man who bought live stock had not yet turned up! And so the doctor pushed on, once more. The “‘ Boop Srock” of the “ Porte-Monnaie I owe ‘em Company” * was thus advertised, also: “IN appiTion to the genuine, unadulterated Prince Albert fowls, the ‘ Porte-Monnaie I owe ’ems’ offer pigs, with tails on, of the Winsor, Unproved Essex, Proved Suf- folks, Yorkshire, Wild Indian, Bramerpouter, Siam, Hong- Kongo, Emperor Napoleons, and Shanghae Breeds; most of them of new styles, and warranted to hold their colors in any climate. “ Also, Welsh Rarebits — bred from their Merino buck ‘ Champum,’ of England (that did nt take the first prize at the National Show, because Mr. Burnham’s ‘ Knockum’ did!), whose ears are each thirty-three feet longer than those of our best pure-bred jackasses, and wider than five snow-shovels, by actual measurement. . ‘* Also, A-quack-it fowls; as Swans (Porte-Monnaie *I trust that this association may not be confourded with the “ Fort Des Moines Iowg. Company.”” The difference will plainly be seen, of course. THE HEN FEVER. 261 I owe em strain), Two-lice, Hong-gong, Brumagem and other Geese. Ruin and Ailsburied Ducks, and Pharmigan Pigeons (blue-billed). “ Also, every breed of Gallinaceous fowls,— Games and other bloods already noted,— together with every species of pure and select blood-stock, which has been secured in Ku- rope, Asia, Africa, and the Arctic Ocean, with reference to QUALITY, without regard to price. “> We can furnish pedigrees to all buyers who desire them, which will be endorsed by the faculty of Riply Col- lege, Iowa. ‘CN. B. The ‘Winsor’ breed of pigs imported by us is a great addition to the already fine hog stock of the United States, and is fully equal, if not superior, to any other breed. They are the very choicest of the royal stock which is so much admired in England. We are in possession of the shipping papers of these splendid pigs. The freight and incidental expenses on them, alone, amount to about six hundred dollars. They ought to be fine pigs. Three hun- dred dollars a pair for the pigs from this splendid stock would be dow, taking their great value into consideration. We have often heard of Prince Albert’s stock of pigs, but until G. P. Burnham, Esq., of Russet House, Melrose, first imported this superb stock into this country, no Ameri- can was ever honored with a shy at this extraordinary breed of swine. The company, at great expense and trouble, 262 THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. prevailed upon Mr. Burnham to part with a few of his sec- ond-rate samples; and they have now no doubt that they will be able to ‘beat him all to rags,’ in a few months, since they have been lucky enough to get them from him purely bred (probably !). “P. §. Of these pigs, which gained the first prize and gold and silver medal at London in December, 1863, and the first prize and gold and silver medal in Birmingham, were from Tibby, by Wun-eyed Jack. Old Pulgubbin’s pigs gained a prize at Mutton-head in 1729, and one at London in 1878.” : Still, notwithstanding all this extra flourish of trumpets, the ‘‘ Porte Monnaie I owe ’em Company ’’ is well-nigh defunct. It was started, unfortunately, about five years and eight months ‘‘ too late in the season.”’ Yet, as I honor talent and enterprise, wherever they may be shown, I trust that this association may be galvanized into successful operation — as, perhaps, it will! CHAPTER XXXIX. A SATISFACTORY PEDIGREE. In the course of my live-stock experience, and espe- cially during the excitement that prevailed amidst the routine of the hen-trade, I found myself constantly the recipient of scores and hundreds of the most ridiculously unreasonable and meaningless letters, from the fever-struck (and inno- cent) but uninitiated ‘victims of this epidemic. In England, amongst other nonsense bearing upon this subject, the more cunning poultry-keepers resorted to the farnishing of pedigrees for the birds they sold. This trick worked to admiration in Great Britain fora time, and the highest-sounding names were given to certain favorite fowls the progeny of which (‘‘with pedigree attached”) com- manded the most extravagant and ruinous prices, in the English ‘fancy’ market. . For instance, I noticed in the London papers, in 1852, an account given of the sale of “two splendid cinnamon- colored chickens, out of the famous cock ‘Jerry,’ by the noted hen ‘ Beauty,’ sired by ‘Napoleon,’ upon the well- 264 THE HISTORY OF known ‘Queen Dowager,’ grandsire ‘Prince Albert,’ on ‘ Victoria First,’ ’’ &. &c., which brought the handsome sum of one hundred and sixty pounds (or about eight hundred dollars). And, soon afterwards, the same dodge was adopted on this side of the Atlantic. The ‘‘ Porte-Monnaie T owe ’em Company ” have mow an advertisement in sev- eral New York and Western papers, concluding thus : “To all who desire it, we will furnish authentic pedi- grees of our stock of all descriptions, which may be relied on for their accuracy.”’ This sort of thing was rather too much for my naturally republican turn of mind;. and, though I could endure almost anything in the humbug of this bubble, I could n’t swallow zhis. I received from New York State, one day, the following spicy epistle : “Mr. BURNHAM. “Sir: [have been a live-stock breeder for some years in this and the old country, and I was desirous to obtain only pure-blooded fowls when I ordered the ‘ Cochins’ of you last month. I asked you for their pedigree. You have sent none. What does this mean? I paid you your price seventy-five dollars —for three chickens. What have you sent me? Am I dealing with a gentleman?- Or are you a mere shambles-huckster? What are these fowls THE HEN FEVER. 265 bred from? Perhaps I may find myself called upon to speak more plainly, sir. Ihope not. Whoare you? Isent fora pedigree, and I want it. J must have it, sir. You will comprehend this, I presume. If you do not, I can en- lighten you further. In haste, I smiled at the earnestness of this letter, the more par- ticularly when I reflected that this gentleman always sup- plied to his patrons a thing he called a pedigree, for all the animals he sold — so intricate, conglomerated and lengthy, that no one would ever venture to dispute the authenticity and reliability of the document he sent them. I re-read his sharp communication, and I found the sen- tence again, ‘‘ Who are you? I sent for a pedigree, and I must have it.”” And I sat down, at once, and wrote him as follows : ‘« Melrose, Mass., 1853. “My Dear Sir: “Your peppery favor came duly to hand. You say you ‘want a pedigree,’ and that you ‘must have it;’ and you inquire who J am? I cannot furnish any such history for my fowls, for I haven’t the slightest idea what, they are, except that they are bred from my superb imported ‘ Cochin- Chinas,’ which have so long been pronounced the ‘ admira- tion of the world.’ "28 266 THE HISTORY OF ‘‘ But, since you must have a pedigree, you say, and as you seem anxious to know who J am, I enclose you the fol- lowing, as an accurate account of my own pedigree, which I furnished to a legal gentleman in New York city, some years since,* and which, I presume, will answer your pur- pose as well as any other would; as I observe, by your polite favor now before me, that you ‘want a pedigree.’ Please read this carefully, and then inform me (as you promise to do) if you ‘can enlighten me further’ ! “Very profoundly yours, “G. P. B.” It will be necessary, in order that my readers may the better appreciate the pedigree that follows (and which I enclosed to my correspondent, ag above stated), to inforin them that some fifteen years ago, or more, there was a per- son named Burnham, who died in England, leaving no will behind him; but who was possessed, at the time of his decease, of an immense fortune, said to amount to several millions of pounds sterling in value. ‘As soon as the intel- ligence reached this country, the Burnhams were greatly elated with their prospects, and meetings of the imaginative * This article was originally published in the New York Spirit of the Times, substantially, and was afterwards issued in an edition of my fugitive literary productions, by Getz & Buck, of Philadelphia, in a vol- ume entitled *‘ Stray Subjects.”’ THE HEN FEVER. 267 ¢ ‘theirs’ to this estate were held, who, each and all, believed that a windfall was now in certain prospect before them. The excitement ended as all this sort of thing docs. No one among the Burnhams could identify himself, or substan- tiate the fact of his ever having had a grandfather ; and the bubble was soon exploded. Among the parties who were addressed on the subject of this supposed ‘‘ Burnham for- tune,” was my humble self; the ambitious lawyer who undertook to unravel the mystery, and to recover the money for us, informing me by mail that “it would be of material pecuniary advantage to me to establish my pedigree.” I wrote him as follows: “My Dzar Sir: ‘Your favor, under date 4th instant, came duly to hand, and I improve my earliest moment of leisure (after the un- avoidable delays attendant upon procuring the information you seek) to reply. You are desirous of being made ac- quainted with my ‘pedigree.’ ‘“‘T have to inform you that I have taken some days to examine into this matter, and, after a careful investigation of the ‘records,’ find that I am a descendant, in the direct line, from a gentleman, very well remembered in these parts, by the name of Apam. ‘The old man had two sons. ‘Cain’ and ‘ Abel’ they were called. The latter, by the other’s hands, went dead one day; but as no coroner had 268 THE. HISTORY OF . then been appointed in the county where they resided, ‘ verdict was postponed.’ A third son was born, whom they called ‘Seth.’ Cazm.Adam. had a son named Enoch, who had a son (in the fourth generation) by the name of Malech. Malech had a son whom. he called Noau, from whom. I trace directly my own being. ‘¢ Noah had three sons, ‘Shem,’ ‘ Ham’ and ‘ Japheth. The eldest and youngest — Shem and. Japheth — were a couple of the ‘b’hoys;’ and Ham was a very well-disposed young gentleman, who slept at home o’ nights. But. his two brothers, unfortunately, were not so well inclined. Ham was a sort of ‘ jethro’— the butt of his two brothers, who had done him ‘brown’ so many times, that they. called him ‘burnt.’ For many years he was known, there- fore, as ‘Burnt-Ham.’ Before his death he applied to the Legislature in his diggings for a change of name. He dropped the z, a bill was passed entitling him to the name of Bury-HaM, and hence the surname of your humble servant. So much for the name. ‘Tn several of the newspapers of that period I find al- lusions made to a very severe rain-storm which. occurred ¢ just about this time ;’ andthe public prints (of all parties) agree that ‘this storm was tremendous,’ and that ‘an im- mense amount of damage was done to the shipping and commercial interest.’ As this took place some six thousand years back, however, you will not, I presume, expect me to THE HEN FEVER. 269 quote the particular details of this circumstance, except in so far as refers directly to my own relatives. I may here add, however, that subsequent accounts inform me that everything of any particular value was totally destroyed. A private letter from Ham, dated at the time, declares’ that ‘there wasn’t a peg left to hang his hat on.’ “Qld Noah found it was ‘ gittin’ werry wet under foot’ (to use a familiar expression of his), and he wisely built a canal-boat (of very generous dimensions) for the safety of himself and family. Finding that the rain continued, he enlarged his boat, so that he could carry a very consider- able amount of luggage, in case of accident. This fore- . sight in the old gentleman proved most fortunate, and only confirms the established opinion, that the family is ‘smart ;’ for the ‘ storm continued unabated for forty days and forty nights’ (so say the accounts), until every species of animal and vegetable matter had been ‘used up,’ always excepting the old gentleman’s canal-boat and cargo. “Now, Noah was a great lover of animals. ‘ Of every kind, a male and female,’ did he take into his boat with him, and ‘a nice time’ they must have had of it for six weeks ! Notwithstanding the fact (which I find recorded in one of the journals of the day), that ‘a gentleman, who was swim- ming about, and who requested the old man to let him in, upon being refused, declared that he might go to grass with his old eanoe, for he didn’t think it would be much of 23* 270 THE HISTORY OF a shower, anyhow,’—I say, notwithstanding this opinion of the gentleman, who is represented as having beena ‘ very expert swimmer,’ everything was destroyed. ‘* Ham was one of ’em—/e was! He ‘ knew sufficient t> get out of the rain,’ albeit he wasn’t thought very witty. He took passage with the rest, however, and thus did away with the necessity of a life-preserver. From Ham I trace my pedigree directly down through all the grades, to King Solomon, without any difficulty, who, by the way, was reported to have been a little loose in his habits, and was very fond of the ladies and Manzanilla Sherry. He used to sing songs, too, of which ‘the least said the soonest mended.’ But, on the whole, Sol was a very clever, jolly- good fellow, and on several occasions gave evidence of pos- sessing his share of the cunning natural to our family. Some thought him ‘ wise;’ but, although I have no dispo- sition to abuse any of my ancestors, I think the Queen of Sheba (a very nice young woman she was, too). rather ‘come it’ over the old fellow ! ‘By a continuous chain, I trace my relationship thence through a rather tortuous line, from generation to genera- tion, down to Mr. Matthew,—not the comedian,. but to Matthew, the Collector (of Galilee, I think), who ‘sat at the receipt of customs.’ To ¢his connection I was, un- doubtedly, indebted for an appointment in the Boston Cus- tom-house. Matthew lived in the good old ‘high tariff’ THE HEN FEVER. 271 times, when something in the shape of duties was coming in. But, as nothing is said of his finale, I rather think he absquatulated with the funds of the government. But I will come to the information you desire, without further ado. “You know the ‘Oup ’Un,’ undoubtedly. (If you don’t, there is very little doubt but you will know his namesake hereafter, if you don’t cease to squander your time-in looking after the plunder of the Burnham family !) Well, the ‘Old’Un’ is in the ‘direct line,’ to which I have now endeavored to turn’ your attention; and I have been called, of late years, the ‘Youne ’Un,’ for reasons that will not interest you. To my honored senior (whom I set down in the category as my legitimate ‘ dad’ ) I would refer you for further particulars. He is tenacious of the character of his progeny, and loves me ; I would commend you to him, for it will warm the cockles of his old heart to learn that the ‘Youne ’Uw’ is in luck. “Tf you chance to live long enough to get as far down ‘in my letter as ¢his paragraph, allow me to add that, should you happen to receive any very considerable amount as my share of the ‘property’ for the Burnham family, please not overlook the fact that I am ‘one of ’em,’ and that I have taken pains to tell you ‘ whar I cum from.’ Please forward my dividend by Adams & Co.’s Express (if their crates should be big enough to convoy it), and if 272 THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. it should prove too bulky, turn it into American gold, and charter a steamer to come round for the purpose; I shan’t mind the expense. “Tn conclusion, I can only intimate the high consider- ation [ entertain towards yourself for having prepaid the postage upon your communication ; a very unusual trans- action with legal gentlemen. My sensations, upon closing this hasty scrawl, are, I fancy, very nearly akin to those of the Hibernian who ‘liked to have found a sovereign once,’ —but you will allow me to assure you that it will afford me the greatest pleasure to meet you hereafter, and I shall be happy to give you any further information. in my power touching that ‘ putty’ in prospective. “‘T am, very respectfully, your obedient servant, “Gro. P. Burnuay, alias the ‘Youne ’Un.’” I presume this pedigree was perfectly satisfactory to my correspondent; and I am quite certain that it was of as much account as this kind of thing usually is. At any rate, I heard nothing more from him, in any way; and I made up my mind, therefore, that,.after reading this, he concluded that he could n’t ‘enlighten me further,” as he had so pertly suggested in his communication, quoted in the beginning of this chapter. He is a very nice man, I have no manner of doubt. CHAPTER XL. “DOING THE GENTEEL THING.” ‘Tue xe is one thing you should always bear in mind,” said a nctorious shark to me, one day, while we conversed upon the subject of breeding live-stock successfully — ‘there is one thing you should always remember; and that is, under no circumstances ever permit a fowl or a pig to pass out of your hands to a purchaser, unless you know him to be of pure blood.” This is a pretty theory, and, I have no doubt, such a course would work to admiration, if faithfully carried out (as I always intended to do, by the way); but in this country this was easier to talk about than to accomplish. I have now a letter before me, received some years since, upon this point, and which will give the reader some idea how far this thing extended in certain quarters, and what came of it. ‘Sir: Ihave been informed by my friends, and I have seen it stated in the poultry-books generally, that you are 274 THE HISTORY OF a breeder of fowls who can be relied on. I wish I could Bay as much of some other parties with whom I have dealt, duiing the past year or two. ‘“T have been striving, for a long time, to get possession of some pure-bred domestic fowls, and a strain of thorough- bred Suffolk swine. I am satisfied you have got them. Now, I beg you will understand that I am fortunately pe- cuniarily able to pay for what I seek. I care nothing for prices ; * but I do desire, and stipulate for, purity of blood. Can you supply me? What are your strains? When did you import it, and how has it been bred? “Tf you can send me half a dozen Chinese fowls, all pure bloods, of each of the different varieties, do go, and charge me whatever you please,— only let them be fine, and such as will produce their like. Z “‘T have read much on this subject of poultry, and I want to degin right, you perceive. I have made up my mind that there are not so many varieties of fowls ex- tant as many breeders describe. Iam satisfied that these domestic birds hail originally from China, and that all of them are of one blood. What is your opinion? ‘Write me your views, please, and let me know if you can furnish me what I seek, upon honor; bearing in mind * This was the kind of customer] met with occasionally, and whom. I always took at his word. The gentleman who “ did n’t care about price * was always the man after my own heart. a THE HEN FEVER. 275 that I am ready to pay your price, whatever it may be; but that I want only pure-blooded stock. “Yours, respectfully, 6c ” I immediately forwarded to this customer (as I usually did to my newly-found patrons) copies of the portraits of my ‘“‘genuine Suffolk” pigs, and of my “ pure-bred ” and ‘imported ”’ Chinese fowls. These “pictures,” samples of which appear in this work upon pages 174 and 212, had the desired effect. I rarely forwarded to these beginners one of these nicely-got-up circulars that didn’t ‘‘ knock ’em”’ at first sight. These gentlemen stared at the engravings, exclaimed “Can it be?” thrust their hands to the very bottom of their long purses, and ordered the stock by return of mail. In this last-mentioned case, I informed my correspondent that I agreed with him in the ideas he had advanced pre- cisely (I usually did agree with such gentlemen), and I entertained no doubt that he was entirely correct in his views as to the origin of domestic fowls, of which he evi- dently knew so much. (This helped me, amazingly.) I pointed out to him the distinction that existed (without a difference) between a ‘“‘ Shanghae’”’ and a ‘‘ Cochin-China,” and finally concluded my learned and unselfish appeal by 276 THE HISTORY OF hinting (barely hinting) to him that I felt certain he was the best judge of the facts in the case, and I would only suggest that, so far as my experience went, there were, in reality, but ten varieties of pure-bred fowls known to orni- thologists (I was one of this latter class), and that these ten varieties were the Cochins, the White, Grey, Dominique, Buff, Yellow, Red, Brown, Bronze and Black Shang- Aaes— and these were the only kinds J ever bred. _As to their purity of blood, I could only say, that I im- ported the original stock myself, and “enclosed”? he had ‘their portraits ; to which I referred with pride and confi- dence and pleasure, &c. &c. &c. Of their probable merits I must leave it entirely to his own good judgment to decide: I had this stock for sale, and it did not become me (mind this!) didn’t become me to praise it, of course (O no!). And I would say no more, but simply refer him to the public prints for my character as a breeder of blooded stock, etc. etc. etc. Did this take him down? Well, it did; vide the follow- ing reply from him, two weeks subsequently. ‘*My Dazar Srr: “‘T never entertained a doubt that you were all you had been represented ; and your reputation is, indeed, an envi- able one, in the midst of these times, when so much deceit and trickery is being practised among this community. I THE HEN FEVER. Qt7 am flattered with the tone of your kind letter, just received, and I am greatly pleased that you thus readily coincide with me in regard to my opinions touching the fowl race. ‘*T had come to the conclusion that there were but eight real varieties of genuine fowls; but I observe that, in your last favor, you describe ¢en strains of pure-bloods, that you know to be such. The portraits of your stock are beauti- ful. You allude to the ‘Bronze’ and the ‘ Dominique’ colored Shanghaes. These must be very fine, I have no doubt; and I gladly embrace the opportunity to enclose, you a draft on Merchants’ Bank, Boston, for six hundred dollars, in payment for six of each of your splendid varieties of this pure China stock, the like of which (on paper, at least) I have never yet been so fortunate as to meet with. ‘« Please forward them, as per schedule, in care of Adams & Co.’s Express; whose agents, I am assured, will feed and water them regularly three times a day* on the route, and who are universally proverbial for their attention to the birds thus directed and intrusted to their care. I shall order the ‘Suffolks’ shortly. Yours, truly, “ o I sent this anxious purchaser sixty chickens, at ten dol- * Certainly —of-course. The express agents had nothing else to do but to ‘* feed and water’? fowls “ three times a day ‘’ on the way ! 24 278 THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. lars each (cheap enough, to be sure), in accordance with his directions, and he was delighted with them. I do not now entertain a shadow of doubt that every one of those ten “* different varieties”’ were bred from white hens and a black cock, of the ordinary ‘‘ Shanghae”’ tribe. CHAPTER XLI. THE FATE OF THE ‘MODEL’? SHANGHAES. Napo eon, the great, found himself compelled to suc- cumb to adverse fate, at the end of a long and brilliantly triumphant career. ‘It was destiny,” he said; and he bowed to the fiat, which at last he was unable successfully to dodge. I was the fortunate owner of a pair of fine Shanghae fowls, that were universally acknowledged to be ‘‘at the head of the crowd,’ —so far as there was any beauty or attractive qualities, whatever, in this species of animal,— and I thought they were not bad-looking birds, really. I caused a likeness to be taken of them from life, accu- rately, and it was placed, some years since, at the head of the circulars which I always enclosed back to my corres- pondenis, in reply to their favors and inquiries regarding my views as to what was the best kind of domestic bird for breeding. The cock was very handsomely formed, and when in full feather was exceedingly showy, and graceful, and noble in 280 THE HISTORY OF his carriage. His hen companions were fine, too; but there was one in particular, that, in company with this bird, I showed at several fairs, where they invariably carried away the first premium, without any question or cavil,as to com- parative beauty and merit. I named them ‘“ Napoleon” and the “ Empress.” Their joint weight, when in the best condition, was about twenty-two pounds ; and as the “‘fancy”’ then raged, they were really unexceptionable. I ‘‘donno” how many chick- ens I have sold by means of the pictures of these birds, but I do know that, unfortunately, this particular hen never laid an egg while I owned her, which was some two years. Still, she was very handsome, as was also her husband ; and IT certainly raised a great many fine chickens while they were in my yards. I called them my very best,— and they were, indeed, to look at,—a model pair of Shang- haes, as will be seen by a glance at their portraits on the next page. But they were singled out for a curious fate. At two or three.of our early fairs they had taken the first prizes; and at one of the exhibitions, finally, there chanced to come along a gentleman who fancied them exceedingly, and who was bound to possess himself of the best that could be had. ' ‘He hada long purse (though, at the time he bought, prices were not up to the mark they reached subsequently, by a long margin); and when he offered forty dollars for this THE HEN FEVER. 281 7m HE “MODEL” SHANGHAES, —- (See page 280.) 282 THE HISTORY OF “ model” pair, it was thought, by most of the outsiders, to be a fabulous transaction altogether, made up between us to aid in gulling “the people.’ However, he paid his money for them, sent them off, and the following account of their subsequent fate is thus touchingly furnished by my friend _ “ Acorn,” who chanced to be “in at the death” : “The gentleman who became the fortunate purchaser of these fine fowls had come to the city in the morning for the purpose of posting himself up generally, and to procure a pair of these then very desirable birds, though he did not imagine that he would be called upon to come down so ‘werry han’some’ for a single pair. He saw these, how- ever, and visions of brilliant promise loomed up before him, if he could contrive to obtain them, however high a figure this ‘magnificent’ twain might be held at. As soon as he secured them, he felt that his fortune was made. “He calculated to remain in town until evening, and, sit- ting down, he hastily wrote a note to the keeper of a fash- ionable hotel in T dine with him, and that the bearer would deliver him a pair of uice chickens, which he desired him to take charge of. He also directed the boy (to whom he gave this note and the coop) to say that he would take dinner with his friend at four Pp. M.; and, sending up the fowls, he turned to other matters, for the day. street, informing him that he would THE HEN FEVER. 288 “Arriving at the hotel, the youngster found the landlord, and said, ‘*¢Here ’s a pair of rousing big chickens Mr. M——-s has sent up; and he says he ’ll be here to dine with you at four v’clock.’ “The landlord supposed that his friend knew a hawk from a handsaw, as well as a canvass-back from a broiled owl; and believed that he had ‘sent up’ something a little extra for the proposed dinner. He therefore ordered the two birds to be placed in the hands of the cook, and gave directions also to have these ‘model Shanghaes’ killed and dressed at once, for the proposed dinner, to come off at four o’clock p. M.! ‘This order was promptly obeyed; and at the hour ap- pointed the chicken-fancier made his appearance, in com- pany with a few of the ‘boys,’ and the dinner was served up with due accompaniments. After indulging in sundry wine bitters, as a sharpener to their appetites, the snug party sat down to table, and the liberal owner of the forty- dollar Shanghaes was politely invited to carve. While in the act of dissecting those enormous ‘members of the late hen convention,’ the amateur remarked, ‘“*¢?Pon my word, Major, youve a noble pair of chickens here, to be sure.’ ‘«-Ves, yes,’ responded the Major. ‘I think they are an indifferently good-sized pair of birds. They were sent 284 THE HISTORY OF up to me, to-day; by a mutual friend of ours. I think we shall find them choice.’ “A present, eh?’ said the owner, unwittingly. ‘A very clever fellow our friend must be, Major. Capital,— really!’ And as he finally commenced to enjoy the feast, he added, ‘I declare they are very fine, and of the most delicious flavor I ever tasted. Juicy, too,—juicy as a canvass-back.’ . “Thus continued the victim, praising the rich excellence of the birds, until at last he had bagged a bottle or more of sparkling Schreider. While chatting over their Sherry, at last, and enjoying the rich aroma of their regalias, the now unlucky owner of the model Shanghaes suddenly said, ‘By the way, Major, speaking of fowls, what do you think of my hen-purchase, this morning? Are n’t they good “uns ?’ ‘“*¢ Well, Bill,’ rejoined his friend, ‘I think they were delicious. And I won’t mind if you dine with me every day in the week, provided you can send me up such chick- ens as those !’ ““¢ Such chickens!’ exclaimed Bill, astounded, as the thought for the first time flashed upon him that he might possibly now have been dining upon his ‘model Shanghaes.’ ‘Why, Major, what the deuce do you mean?’ “Mean ?’ replied the Major ; ‘nothing, — only to say — without any intention of disturbing your nerves, — THE HEN FEVER. 285 that we have just finished a most capital dinner upon those nice Shanghaes that you sent up to me, this morning.’ “<¢What!’ yelled Bill, jumping wildly up from the table ; ‘ what do you say, Major?’ “*Those Shanghaes —’ ** Bill groaned, rammed his hands clean up to the elbows into his breeches-pockets, and, after striding fiercely across the room some half a dozen times, without uttering another word, but with his eyes all this time ‘in a fine frenzy rolling,’ he stopped short, and, turning to the Major, he exclaimed, with no little gesticulation, *** Good God, Major, you don’t mean to say you’re seri- ous, now ?’ ““¢ Nothing else, Bill. What’s the matter ?’ “*Why, I paid forty dollars for that puir of chickens, this morning, at the hen-show !’ “You did !* “*Yes, Did n’t that stupid boy give my note, when he left the chickens ?? ““¢Not a note; not even a due-bill,’ said the Major, provokingly. ‘“*¢T mean my letter,’ coutinaed Bill. ‘** No,’ said the Major, ‘he gave me no letter; he sim- . ply delivered the fowls, and informed me that you would dine with me at four p.m I thought, of course, you would like them thus, and so I had ’em roasted.’ 286 THE HISTORY OF “Bill didn’t stop for further explanations, but rushed for his horse and wagon, and wasn’t seen in the city but once afterwards, for a long-time. He was then closely muffied up, and had both his ears stopped up with cotton- batting, lest he might possibly hear some one say Shang- hae! : ** A few weeks afterwards, while passing near his resi- lence, I halted, and dropped in upon him for an hour; and, after a while, I ventured to touch upon the merits and beauties of the different breeds of poultry ; — but I discovered, at once, that there was a wildness about Bill’s eyes, and therefore ceased to allude to this usu- ally interesting ‘ rural’ subject, as Bill exclaimed, implor- ingly, ““¢ Don’t hit me, old boy, now I’m down! That chicken dinner has never yet digested !’”’ Thus “passed away” one of the handsomest pairs of domestic fowls ever seen in this part of the country, and which were well known, by all the fanciers around me, as tip-top specimens of the then lauded race of Shang- haes. This result proved rather an expensive dinner for Mr. M——-s; but, while it served for an excellent lesson to him (as well as to many of his friends who chanced to hear of what the Major called “this capital joke”), he had the THE HEN FEVER. 287 satisfaction, subsequently, of ascertaining that he got off at a remarkably low figure. His hen fever was very quickly, and fortunately, cured. But for this sudden and happy turn in his case, the disease might have cost him far more dearly. The fowls he thus lost were what were then deemed ‘‘tall specimens ;’’ but they did not, in this respect, equal those of a neighbor, who declared that a young Shanghae cock of his grew so high on the leg, that he got to be afraid of him ; and, instead of eating him, one day while the rooster was in a meditative mood, he contrived to place a twenty- feet ladder beside him, and, mounting it, mansged to blow out the monster’s brains, greatly to the owner’s velief. CHAPTER XLII. AN EMPHATIC CLINCHER. Ownx of the last specimen detters that I will offer I re- ceived late in the year of our Lord 1854, which afforded me as much amusement (considering the circumstances of the case) as any one I ever yet received, of the thousands that found their way to ‘‘Geo. P. Burnham, Esq., Boston, Mass.’ Here it is, word for word : ise. “Gzore Burnam : More ’n.a yeer aggo i cent yu twenty six dollers in a leter for 3 coshin chiner Chickns, an yu sed tha wus per- feck pure bludds an yu lade yerseff lyble tu a Sute of pros- ekushn fer letin such dam stuf go intu yure yard or out of it, eether. : “i bred them orl by themselfs an never had no uther cockrill on my plase. an imo yu cheeted me like the devl, an yu no it 2. the fust lot of chickns i gut was awl wite as snobawls. but i didnt sa nothin, cause wy? Wat did I Want tu let fokes no ide bin fuled an suckt in by a THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. 289 Corntemtible yanky, fer! i sed nothin an kep shaidy, an stuk to it that i gut em to breed wite fouls out on — caus i Ment peeple shudent larf at me, no how! ‘“‘ Wel, the nex lot of chickns i gut wus Slack as thun- der! black, Geo Burnam — bred out of yur Patent yaller impoted preemum stock, that yu an the lyin Noospappers ced wus pure bludds. i chocked Every wun on em quick- er ’n scatt-— wen i found um, an ef Yude a bin thare then i guess you Wuddent razed not more’n ten thowsen more fouls to cheet Peeple with after ide a guta holt on yure desaitful gullet. ‘never yu mind now, yuve gut my monny an yu can maik the most of it. aint yu a Pooty kine of mann? dont yu think yu ort tu hav yure Naim put in the nuspapper an jet em say more ’n fifty times a Munth that yu breed onny pure Impoted stock? dont yu feel nice wen Yu heer, about the luck that peeple has with the stuf you impose on em in this shaimfull maner? Yu muss be a Nise kine of a sort of mann, i don think. “i tell yu wot i think on yu. i think if yu Shud taik to sum onnest imploiment, sech as drivin a express Waggin or sorring wood, yude be Considurd a gentle mann Compaired with wat yu now be, everyboddy nose how yu ar cheetin and Gougin and bleadin the publick, an yur naim stinks wuss ’n a ple Hen-cupe enny how. i spose tho ef yu shud taik to enny kine of onness sort of way tu git a livin it ud 25 290 THE HISIGRY OF kill yu dam quik cos yu aint uste tu it, an that wud serv yu rite, yu Cheetin lyin onprinsipled nave. ide orter taikn bennits an Minur’s advise, an then i Shudent bin suckt by yu. tha air Gentle mann to yu, an tha aint no better then tha shud be Neyther — xo how ! - ‘i-dont mine the Eckspence, it aint no cornsidable mat- ter of konsekens Tu me, i ’shure yu. ican stan it, yu need n’t be Afeered of that. ican aford tu be suckt wunce- But ide like yu tu tell me how Blak chickns an wite chickns an sum of em orl Cullers tu, can cum out of pure bludded Aigs, or pure bludded fouls? tha carnt, an yu kno it. an yu kno’de it afore, an yure Welcom tu orl yule evyver maik More out of me, bait yure life on that, georg Burnam ! “go ahed. suc em as long.as Yu can. tha wunt fine yu out fer a wile, an yu can maik sum cornsidable mor Monny out of the flatts, yit. yu thort yude suckt meI spoze. welliownup. yudid. yu gut twenty six dollers of my monny an i spose yu chukled about it, same’s yu did Wen yu stuk them roten aigs onto bill turner. Yude beter cum here, this wa, sum fine da an See the stock here thats bred out of yure preemum fouls. praps Yude git hoam agin without a saw hed. i think yu wood. haddn’t yu _ Better try it on — hay ? * “dont yu wish ide pade the postige on this leter? Yule git a wus wun nex time. ile rite yu agin, wunct a weak, cee ef'idont. ile Meat yu sum day at sum of the fares THE HEN FEVER. 291 an then cee if i dont Rake yu down with a corse comb. i haint harf dun with yu yit, by a dam site. so wate. ‘« Tn haist, “B F L . : ¥, “ Poss Skrip. —P. §. i seen in boston Times yister- day that yu ‘Lade six aigs on The editurs table, 8 inchis long an 4 inchis Round.’ This was pygt in that paper i Spose sose yu cud cell Aigs. yu ma pool wull over thair ies But yu dont fule Me. idoant bleeve yu ever Lade a aig in yur life—yu Hombugg. go tu the devl gorge Burnam !”’ A German friend of mine once temporarily left. the pro- fession to which he had been educated thoroughly, and, with a few hundred dollars in hand, purchased a small place, a dozen miles out from the city, which was called by the seller of it “a farm.” Mynheer went to work lustily at his new vocation, slav- ing and sweating and: puffing away over his lately ac- quired grounds, every moment of time that he could bor- ~ row or steal from his legitimate duties, and expending upon his “ farm” every dollar he could rake and scrape . together. In the fall of his first year as a “practical agriculturist,”” I met him casually, and I said, 292 THE HISTORY OF “ A. how does the farming succeed with you? How have you made it ?”’ ‘By gar,” he replied, ‘‘I ’av try vera hard all de time, I’ay plant potato an quash an corn an all dat, I ’av hire all my neighbors to ’elp, I buy all de manoor in town, I ‘av spent all my monish—an wot you tink, now, Burn- ham— wot you tink I get—eh? Well, I git one dam big watermel’n, dass all; but he never git ripe, by gar!” When I had read the letter which I have just quoted above, I thought of my friend A~—, and I said that my correspondent (like a good many before him), as did Myn- heer A beyond his comprehension. , had undertaken a business which was entirely His letter was complimentary, (!) to say the least of it. But the young man was easily excited, I think. He did pay me some twenty-six dollars for four chickens, and from some cause (unknown to this individual) he got only white or black progeny from the yellow fowls I sent him! Was that any’. business ‘of mine? He should have thanked, rather than have abused me, surely,— for didn’t he thus obtain a variety of “pure” stock, from one and the same source ? Such fortune as this was by no means uncommon. The yellow stock was crossed in China, oftentimes, long before we ever saw it here; and there was only one means of THE HEN FEVER. 298 a redress that I could ever recommend to these unitidky wights, conscientiously, and that was to buy more, and try it again. Sometimes “like would breed its like” in poultry; not often, however, within my humble experience! The ama- teurs were continually trying experiments, and grumbling, and constantly dodging from one ‘fancy ”’ kind of fowl to another, in search of the right thing ; and I endeavored to aid them in their pursuit; though they did not always at- tain the/r object, even when they purchased of me. 25* CHAPTER XLIII. “STAND FROM UNDER!” I wave asserted, in another place, that, in all probability, in no bubble, short of the famous ‘‘ South Sea Expedition,” has there ever been so great an amount of money squan- dered, from first to last, as in the chicken-trade; and, surely, into the meshes of ‘no humbug known to us of the present day have there been so many persons inveigled, as could now be counted among the victims of this inex- plicable mania. . Acopy of the Liverpool Express in January, 1854, now lies before me, from which I ‘notice that the great metro- politan show in London, just then closed, surpassed all its predecessors; and that the excitement in England, at that time, was at its height. The editor asserts that “it was not an easy thing to exhaust the merits of the three thou- sand specimens of the feathered tribe there shown. No one,” continues the writer, ‘ who is at all conversant with natural history, can fail to find abundance of material for an hour’s instruction and amusement. The general charac- THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. 295 ter of the exhibition has been already indicated; but this is oneof those cases in which no description, however elabo- rate, can supply the place of personal inspection.” The British correspondent of the Boston Post, but a short time previously, writes that ‘‘ the fowl fever, which has raged with so much violence in New England during the last three years, has extended to this country. There was a great crowing among the cocks at the late Smithfield cattle-show, and there seems to have been a still louder one at the Birmingham fair. “The mania for the purchase of fine fowls,’ continues this writer, ‘was as furious there as if each of them had been the hen in the fable that found the jewel in the dung- hill. Some pairs brought as high as forty pounds (two hundred dollars). One very fine pair of Cochin-Chinas sold for fifty pounds (two hundred and fifty dollars). In the catalogue some were marked at one hundred pounds, the valuation prices of owners who did not wish to sell. With you, in America, the rage for fowl-raising is simply one of fancy and profit,* but here it is the result —and a very beneficial one, too — of free trade. The price of cggs and poultry, owing to the great demand, does not fall; the price of grain, owing to free importation, does fall; and hence the great profit which is realized from keeping fowls. * We have found it a very comfortable “ rage,”’ thank you ! 296 THE HISTORY OF The Dorkings are great favorites, less difficult to raise than with you; and, though not abundant layers, still command, from the greater whiteness and superior delicacy of their flesh, a high price in the market. But the new Cochin China varieties are in the greatest demand ; the display of them at Birmingham exceeded all others, and they are now much sought after here.” Such accounts as these continually occupied the papers ; and the fever had been kept furiously alive, by this means, until far into the year 1854. The most glowing accounts of the pouliry-shows, at home and abroad, were kept up, too; but, in the mean time, Shanghae chickens multiplied rapidly, and grew up, and filled the barns and yards of “the people,”— and at the same time they did not forget how to eat corn, when they could get it. And, in spite of the best endeavors of interested parties to galvanize the hum into a continued existence, it was now evident to those who watched its progress, as J had done, that the death-rattle was clearly in its throat. At this juncture I was reminded of the details of the mulberry-tree bubble, the tulip fever, and the Merino sheep speculation; and I had taken care not to become involved in the final ruin of the hen-trade (as I knew many had been, and more were destined to be), in the eventual wind- ing-up of this affair, which was now close at hand. A brief account of the famous sheep mania (so like the THE HEN FEVER. 297 hen fever i1 its workings) will not bo uninteresting at this point ; and its record here, perhaps, will have the effect of opening the eyes of some chance reader, haply, who is, even now, half inclined to ¢ry his hand in the chicken-trade. This sheep bubble originated in the year 1815 or 1816, immediately after the treaty of Ghent, and at a period when thousands of the American people were actually ‘ wool- mad” in reference to the huge profits that were then ap- parent, prospectively, in manufacturing enterprises. In the summer of the last-named year (as nearly as can be fixed upon), a gentleman in Boston first imported some half-dozen sheep from one of the southern provinces of Spain, whose fleeces were of the finest texture, as it was said; and such, undoubtedly, was the fact, though the sheep were so thoroughly and completely imbedded in tar, and every other offensive article, upon their arrival in America, that it would have been very difficult to have proved this statement. But the very offensive appearance of the sheep seemed to imbue them with a mysterious value, that ren- dered them doubly attractive. Tt was contended that the introduction of these sheep into the United States would enable our manufactories, then in their infancy, to produce broadcloths, and other woollen fabrics, of a texture that would compete with England and Europe. Even Mr. Clay was consulted in reference to the sheep; and he at once decided that they were exactly the 298 THE HISTORY OF * e animals that were wantel; and some of them subsequently found their way to Ashland. The first Merino sheep sold, if I recollect right, for fifty dollars the head. They cost just one dollar each in Anda- lusia! The speculation was too profitable to stop here ; and, before a long feriod had elapsed, a small fleet sailed on a sheep speculation to the Mediterranean. By the end of the year 1816 there probably were one thousand Merino sheep in the Union, and they had advanced in price to twelve hundred dollars the head. Before the winter of that year had passed away, they sold for fifteen hundred dollars the head; and a lusty and good- looking buck would command two thousand dollars at sight. Of course, the natural Yankee spirit of enterprise, and the love which New Englanders bore to the “ almighty dollar,” were equal to such an emergency as this, and hundreds of Merino sheep soon accumulated in the Eastern States. But, in the course of the year 1817, the speculation, in consequence of the surplus importation, began to decline ; ‘yet it steadily and rapidly advanced throughout the Western country, while Kentucky, in consequence of the influence of Mr. Clay’s opinions, was especially benefited. - In the fall of 1817, what was then deemed a very fine Merino buck and ewe were sold to a gentleman in the West- ern country for the sum of eight thousand dollars; and even that was Jeemed a very small price for the animals! THE HEN FEVER. 299 They were purchased by a Mr. Samuel Long, a house builder and contractor, who fancied he had by the transaction secured an immense fortune. Now, Mr. Long had acquired the sheep fever precisely as thousands of others‘(in later days) have taken the hen fever. And, in this case, the victim was réally: rabid with the Merino mania. In proof of this, the following authentic anecdote will be amply sufficient and convincing. There resided, at this time, in Lexington, Ky., and but a short distance from Mr. Clay’s villa of Ashland, a wealthy gentleman, named Samuel Trotter, who was, in fact, the money-king of Kentucky, and who, to a very great extent, at that time, controlled the branch of the Bank of the United States. He had two sheep,—a buck and an ewe,— and Mr. Long was very anxious to possess them. Mr. Long repeatedly bantered and importuned Mr. Trot- ter to obtain this pair of sheep from him, but without suc- cess; but, one day, the latter said to the former, “ If you will build me such a house, on a certain lot of land, as I shall describe, you shall have the Merinos.”’ “Draw your plans for the buildings,” replied Long, instantly, ‘and let me see them; I will then decide.” The plans were soon after submitted to him, and Long eagerly accepted the proposal, and forthwith engaged in the enterprise. He built for Trotter a four-story brick house, about fifty feet by seventy, on the middle of an acre of 800 THE HISTORY OF land; -he finished it in the most approved modern style, and enclosed it with a costly fence; and, finally, handedit over to Trotter, for the zwo Merino sheep. The establish- ment must have cost, at the very least, fifteen ° aienewad dollars.. : But d alas! ‘A long while before this beautiful and costly estate was fully completed, the price of Merinos' declined gradually ; and six months had not passed away before they would not command twenty dollars each, even in Ken- ne . c ..Mr. Long was aubeoduontly a wiser but a poorer man. He held on to this pair till their price reached the par value only of any other sheep; and then he absolutely killed this buck and ewe, made a princely barbecue, called all his friends to the feast, and whilst, the “goblet went its giddy rounds,” like the ruined Venetian, ‘he thanked God that, at that moment, he was not worth a ducat ! This is absolute, sober fact. Mr. Long was ‘oust and irretrievably ruined in-his pecuniary affairs; and very soon after this ‘‘sumptuous dinner,” he took sick, and actually died: of a broken heart, 7 Along in the summer and fall. of 1854, having watched the course that matters. were taking in the chicken-trade, I became cautious; for I thought I heard in the far-off dis- tance something indefinite, and almost undistinguishable, yet pointed and emphatic in its general tone. I listened; THE HEN FEVER. 801 and, as nearly as I could make the warning out, it sounded like “Take care!” And so I waited for the dénowement that was yet to come. In the mean time, I had a friend who for five long years had been religiously seeking for that incomprehensi- ble and never-yet-come-at-able ignis fatuus, a genuine “ Cochin-China”’ fowl of undoubted purity ! I had not heard of or from him for some weeks; until, one morning, about this time, a near relative of his sent to my house all that remained of this indefatigable searcher after truth ; an accurate drawing of which J instantly caused to be made —and here it is! CHAPTER XLIV. BURSTING OF THE BUBBLE, My friend John Giles, of Woodstock, Conn., has some- where said, of late, ‘I often hear that the ‘fowl’ fever is dying out. If by this is meant the unhealthy excitement which we have had for a few years past, for one, I say the sooner that it dies out the better. But as to the enthusiasm of ¢rue lovers of the feathered tribe dying out, it never will, as long as man exists. It is part of God’s creation. The thinking man loves and admires his Maker’s work ; always did; always will. And I have not the least doubt that any enterprising young man, with a suitable place and fancier’s eye, would find it to his advantage to embark in the enter- prise of fowl-raising for market.” . Now, I don’t know but John is honest in this assertion, — that is, I can imagine that he believes in this theory! But how he can ever have arrived at such a conclusion (with the results of his own experience before him), is more than I can comprehend. Laying aside all badinage, for the moment, I think it may THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. 808 be presumed that I have had some share of experience in this business, practically, and I think I can speak advis- edly on this subject. As far back as during the years 1839, 40 and ’41, I erected, in Roxbury, a poultry estab- lishment on a large scale, upon a good location, where I had the advantages of ample space, twenty separate hen-houses, running water and a fine pond on the premises, glass- houses (cold, and artificially heated, for winter use), and every appurtenance, needful or ornamental, was at my command. I purchased and bred all kinds of domestic fowls there,. and they were attended with care from year’s end to year’s end. But there was no profit whatever resulting from the undertaking, and why ? The very week that a mass of poultry — say three to five hundred fowls —is put together upon one spot, they begin to suffer, and fail, and retrograde, and die. No amount of care, cleanliness or watching, can.evade this result. In a body (over a dozen to twenty together), they cannot thrive; nor can the owner coax or force them to lay eggs, by any known process.* * Since this was written, I find in the Country Gentleman a communica- tion from L. F. Allen, Esq., on this very subject, in which he says that « 4 correspondent desires to know howto build a chicken-house for ‘ about one thousand fowls.’ If my poor opinion is worth anything, he will not build it at ail. Fowls, in any large number, will not thrive. Although I 804 THE HISTORY OF To succeed with the breeding of poultry, the stock must be colonized (if a large number of fowls be kept), or else only a few must find shelter in any one place, about the farm or country residence. And my experience has taught me that five hens together will yield more eggs than fifty- five together will in the same number of months. I honestly assert, to-day, that of all the humbug that exists, or which has been made to exist, on this subject, no part of it is more glaringly deceptive, in my estimation, than that which contends for the profit that is to be gained by breeding poultry— as a business by itself — for market consumption. The idea is preposterous and ridiculous, and no man can accomplish it,—I care not what his facil- ities may be,— to any great extent, upon a single estate. The thing is impossible; and I state this, candidly, after many years of practical experience among poultry, on a liberal scale, and in the possession of rare advantages for repeated experiment. I do not say that certain persons wht have kept a few fowls (from twenty-five to a hundred, perhaps), and who have looked after them carefully, may not have realized a profit upon them, in connection with the farm. But, to have seen it tried, I never knew a large collection of several hundred fowls succeed in a confined place. Ihave known sundry of these enter- prises tried ; but I never knew one permanenily successful. They were ail, in turn, abandoned.’’ The thing is entirely impracticable. THE HEN FEVER. 805 make it a business by itself, I repeat it, a mass of domestic and aquatic fowls cannot be kept together to any advan- tage whatever, their produce to be disposed of at ordinary market value. The fever for the fancy ” stock broke out at a time when money was plenty, and when there was no other speculation rife in which every one, almost, could easily participate. The prices for fowls increased with astonishing rapidity. The whole community rushed into the breeding of poultry, without the slightest consideration, and the mania was by no means confined to any particular class of individuals — though there was not a little shyness among certain circles who were attacked at first; but this feeling soon gave way, and our first men, at home and abroad, were soon deeply and riotously engaged in the subject of henology. Meantime, in England they were doing up the matter somewhat more earnestly than with us on this side of the water. To show how even the nobility never “put their hand to the plough and look back ’’ when anything in this line is to come off, and the better to prove how fully the _ poultry interests were looked after in England, I would point to the names of those who, from 1849 to 1855, patronized the London and Birmingham associations for the improvement of domestic poultry. The Great Annual Show, at Bingley Hall, was got up under the sanction of His Royal Highness Prince Albert, 26% 806 THE HISTORY OF THE ILEN FEVER. the Duchess of Sutherland, Lady Charlotte Gough, the Countess of Bradford, Rt. Hon. Countess of Littlefield, Lady Chetwynd, Hon. Viscountess Hill, Lady Littleton, Hon. Mrs. Percy, Lady Scott, and a host of other noble and royal lords and ladies, whose names are well known among the lines of English aristocracy. But, as time advanced, the star of Shanghae-ism began to wane. The nobility tired of the excitement, and the people of England and of the United States began to ascertain that there was absolutely nothing in this ‘‘ hum,” save what the “importers and breeders ’’ had made, through the influence of the newspapers; and while a few of the last men were examining the thickness of the shéll, cautiously and warily, the long-inflated bubble burst! and, as the fragments descended upon the devoted heads of the unlucky star-gaz- ers, a cry was faintly heard, from beneath the ruins — “ Stand from under !” I had been watching for this climax for several months; and when the explosion occurred, as nearly as I can “ cal- "late, I was n't thar ! * CHAPTER XLV. ‘; THE DEAD AND WOUNDED. I uavn never yet been able to ascertain, authentically, all the exact particulars of the final catastrophe ; but, basing un opinion upon the numerous ‘“ dispatches”? I received from November, 1854, to February, 1855, the number of dead and wounded must have been considerable, if not more. I received scores of letters, during this last period men- tioned, of which the annexed is a fair sample: “G, P. Burngam, Esa. ‘Dear Srr: I’m afraid the jig is up ! There ’s a big hole in the bottom somewhere, or Iam mistaken. I think the dance is concluded; and if it isn’t time to ‘blow out the lights’ and shut down the gate, just let us know,—will you? Where’s Bennett, and Harry Williams, and Dr. Eben, and Childs, and Ad. White, and Brackett, and Johnny Giles, and Uncle Alden, and Buckminster, and Chickering, and Coffin, and Fussell, and Chenery, and Gilman, and Hatch, and Jaques, and Barnum, and Southwick, and Packard, and Balch, and 308 THE HISTORY OF Morton, and Plarsted, and Geo. White, e¢ id omne genus ? Where are they all? Sta a-y! “What has become of Platt, and Miner, and N ewell, and Hudson, and Heffron, and Taggard, and Hill, and Swett, and M’ Clintock, and Dr. Kerr, and Devereux, and Thacher, and Haines, and Hildreth, and Brown, and Smith, and Green, ahd ¢heir allies 2 Are they dead, or only ‘ kilt’? Let me know, if you can, I beseech you ! . “<¢Q, where, tell me where,’ is my bonnie friend John Moore, and mine ancient frére Morse, and my loved chum Howard, and the wily Butters? And where’s Ped- der —the immaculate Pedder ? ‘And Charley Belcher, too, and bragging | Cornish, and Billy Everett, and. our good neighbors Parkinson, and George, and Sol. J: ewett, and Pres- ident Kimball, and know-nothing King, and the reverend Marsh, and Pendletonian Pendleton of Pendleton Hill, and their satellites? Have all departed, and left no wreck behind? I reckon not ! ‘ Seriously, friend B——, what does all this mean? Has the fever passed by? Can’t we offer another single prescription? Has the Jast man been heard from? Has there been found ‘a balm in Gilead’ to heal the wounds of the afflicted sufferers? Is the thing finished? Are they all cured? Did you say all? Dunder and blixen! Is anybody hurt? What are we todo? ‘ Speak, or die !’ “Where are the ‘ Committee,’ and the ‘J udges,’ and the THE HEN FEVER. 809 ‘ Trustees,’ and the ‘Managers’? Where is the ‘ Society ’ whose name, ‘like linked sweetness long drawn out,’ [ have n't time to write? Where is that balance in the Treasurer’ s hands,’—and where is that functionary himself ? Did he ever exist at all? What has become of the premi- ums that were awarded at the last show in Boston?» And when, in the language of the enthusiastic Mr. Snooks (at the Statehouse in 1850), will that Association begin ‘to be forever perpetuated,’— eh? “JT have got on hand three hundred of the Shanghae devils! What can Ido with them? There is a neighbor of mine (a police-officer), who has got stuck with a lot of ‘ Cochin’ chickens, which he swears he won’t support this winter; and he has at last advertised them as stolen prop- erty, in the faint hope, I suppose, that some ‘ green ’un’ will come forward dnd claim them. You can’t get rid of these birds! It is useless to try to sell them; you can’t give them away; nobody will take them. You can’t starve them, for they are fierce and dangerous when aggra- vated, and will kick down the strongest store-closet door ; and you can’t kill them, for they are tough as rhinocer- oses, and tenacious of life as cats. Ah! Burnham, I have never forgiven the man who made me a present of my first lot! Do you want what I’ve got left? Will you take them How much shall I pay you to receive them ? Help me out, if you can. 810° THE HISTORY OF “T am not aware that I ever committed any offence, that this judgment should be thus visited upon. my poor head! I never sold fowls for what they were not; I never cheated anybody, that I know of; Ido not remember ever having done any unjust act that should: bring down upon me ‘this terrible vengeance. Yet I am now the owner of nearly three hundred of these infernal, cursed, miserable ghosts in ‘feathered mail,’ which I cannot get rid of! Tell me what I shall do, and answer promptly. “Yours, in distress, oe ” I have smiled over this document, so full of feeling and earnestness, so lively and touching in its recollections of the days when we went chicken-ing, long time ago! But I have never been able to reply fully to my ardent friend’s ‘numerous inquiries. I don’t want those ‘‘three hundred Shanghae devils,” though. I have now on hand nine of them (only, thank Heaven!) myself; and that is quite enough for one farm, at the present current price of grain. What has become of all the friends about whom my cor- respondent so carefully inquires, I don’t know. Not jive of them are now iv the hen-trade, however ; and there are not ten of, them who got owt of the business with a whole skin, from the commencement. The engine has collapsed its boiler. ‘There was alto- THE HEN FEVER. 311 gether too much steam crowded on, and the managers were not all “up to snuff’ The dead and wounded and dying are now scattered throughout New England and New York State chiefly, and their moans can occasionally be heard, though their groans of repentance come too late to help them. They recklessly invested their twenties, or fifties, or hun- dreds, and, in some instances, their thousands of dollars, in this hum, without any knowledge of the business, and without any consideration whatever, except the single aim to keep the bubble floating aloft until they could realize anticipated fortunes, on a larger or smaller scale, as the case might be. But the ‘cars have gone by,” and they may now wait for another train. Perhaps it will come! Poor fellows! Poor, deluded, crazy, reckless dupes! You have had your fun, many of you, and you will now have the opportunity to reflect over the ruins that are piled up around you; while, for the time being, you may well exclaim, with the sulky and flunkey Moor, ‘© Othello’s occupation ’s GONE!’ CHAPTER XLVI. A MOURNFUL PROCESSION. * I was sitting before my comfortable library fire in mid- winter, 1854, and had been reflecting upon the mutability of human affairs generally, and the uncertainty of Shang- hae-ism more particularly, when I finally dropped into a gentle slumber in my easy-chair, where I dozed away an hour, and dreamed. My thoughts took a very curious turn. I fancied myself sitting before a large window that opened into a broad pub- lic street, in which I suddenly discovered a multitude -of people moving actively about; and I thought it was some gala-day in the city, for the throng appeared to be excited and anxious. ‘ The people ’”’ were evidently abroad; and the crowds finally packed themselves along the diol leaving the wide street open and clear; and I could over- hear the words ‘‘ They ’re coming!” “ ne they are!” I looked out, and beheld an immense gathering of human beings approaching in a line that stretched away as far as the eye could reach,—a dense mass of moving mortality, THE HISTORY OF THE HEN FEVER. 813 that soon arrived, and passed the window, beneath me. I was alone in the room, and could ask no questions. I could only see what occurred before me; and I noted down, as they passed by, this motley PRocussIoN, which moved in the following Order of March. Escort or InpEscRIBABLES. Hatless Aid. [ Chief Marshal in Black. ] Bootless Aid. Police. Two Ex-Mormons 1n Wurre Tonics. Police. Calathumpian Band, Whig The ‘Know Nothing Guards,’’ with guns 2 Democrat Office-holders, enough for all useful purposes. Expectants. ‘Ture “‘ Ins.”? [ Cottecror and Postmaster. ] Tue ‘* Ovrs.”? The ‘* National ’? Democracy, two deep, U.S. Dist. Ate in one section. nea eee BANNER. Motto — ** We know of Burns that Russia Salve can’t cure.”” “ Aids to the Revenue.’? { MarsHat. ] Drawbacks on the Revenue. Kaleb Krushing. [ Tae Man wo Faintep 1n Mexico. ] Jorge ah ! Poll. “ Fanny Fern,”’ : Flanked by a company of disappointed Publishers, twenty-four deep, in twelve sections. BANNER. Motto. — ‘*She’s a brick !”’ Aids. [ MarsHat, ] Aids. President of the “‘ N. E. Mutual Admiration ’? Hen Society. Fat Marshal. [ Tue Great SHow May. J] Lean Marshal. Banp, playing the ‘‘ Rogue’s March.” Marshal. Guost or Jorce Hern. Marshal. Aids, A Fejee Mermaid, astride Aids, of Quaking Shakers. the Woolly Horse. The Happy Family. U.S. Marshal. ; Invited Guests. ror . The Three Historians, “ admirers.” Burnuam, Prescot, and BANncrart. ef Escort in the rear, with charged bayonets. A genuine ‘ Cocuin-Curra ”’ Rooster, } Police. Police. ; succeeded by the man who knew him to be such ! Marshal. § The entire United States American Spa Marshal. Pea Wilder. § Agricultural Society, in a one-horse buggy. ) ¥- ESS king. 27 ids, Their readers 314 THE HISTORY OF [The good this association had accomplished was borne along -y a stout ‘* practical farmer,’ ina small thimble; the records of its doings were inscribed on a huge roll of paper, 16,000 yards long, carried upon a truck drawn by twelve yoke of ‘* pure’? Devon oxen.] Banner. — Motto: “* Ourselves and those who vote for us.”’ Aid, An ex-U. 8. Navy Agent who left that office Aid, Naval Store { without having made money out of his place ! U. 8. Keeper. Banner. — Motto : “* Poor, but honest.’? Sub-Treasurer. The Mass. Hort. Improvement Society, ‘en’ masse, with several full hands of | pwenty-five ig music, on “ seedling’? accompani- | hundred and-one Marshals. ments, etc. gold-medal BANNER. seekers. Motto : ** Cuss thexConcord Grape.”’ No The max who voluntarily gave up his office under the r Aids. National government, solus, on horseback, with Paeeee: Banner. — Motto: ‘* Few die, and none resign.’’ **Tae Youne ’Un,”’ The defunct in his own barouche, drawn by four * superb His New England dapple-grey Shanghaes.’’ barony S Hen Society. | Bannun.— Motto :, Mosro. § Banner.— Motto: | petitors. ** Who's afraid??? $0 ‘Not this child!” J Hen Men wHo HAD MISTAKEN THEIR CALLING, } Police Patice. § twenty-eight deep, in four hundred sections. Aids, in seventy sections, Min a vow otitts 24 Constables. sixty-four deep. Bann, playing ‘* Hope told a flattering tale..’? - The great-grandson of the man who set out an orchard of dwarf Pear-trees | with thum)s Rae ah asim (ina barouche). He was 102 years on their old, and believed he should see fruit on MOBERS those same trees ‘‘ next season ’? ! Palit Bearers. [ HIS COFFIN, BEHIND. ] Heirs to his estate. Grain Men, with their bills, ae ae f BeLravers THAT CooHITuaTs WATER ae Batts Physicians. WHOLESOME (in a chaise). Commissioners. Chicken Fanciers who did n°t buy their eggs of 16 Marshals. me. and who expected they would hatch ! 15 Marshals. (Four thousand strong.) oe A body of Express Agents, who never shook Aids, up the eggs intrusted to them (though Aids, the Conductors. they occasionally shook down their em- f the Brakemen, ployers). Banp. — Air: “O, I never will deceive you !” THE HEN FEVER. 815 “ My friend Tan Presipent,”’ Flankeit by In the carriage presented to him by the Subscribers ‘the people,’? drawn by that incu who ov that ** superd puir of #1500 horses ’? did Wt obtain *& Double Harness,” cae 4 we Ba of in fat offices. - the papers. Motto: Motto : © T°ll see you in the Fall.” ; Teaaren, } “ Save me from my friends !?? Full Band. The Hatch Grey Shanghac Express Co., . Aid, with the latest news from Nantucket Aid, & Brass & Co. and ‘‘ Marm Hackett’s Garden.”? Tax “CoLoneL. Motto: <‘ImporTant, oF TRUE !”? Holders of Second Mortgage R. R. Bonds, Aid, 24 deep, in 2400 sections. Aid, Two Presidents. BANNER. One Treasurer. Motto: ** There ’s a good time coming.’” Aids, The owner of the first ‘* Brahma Pootra ”” Aids, 6 Regular fowls in America, with a map of India _Faculty of Dostors. on the seat of his pantaloons. Ripura College. Ga The original members of the ‘a 2 ‘Women’s Riaurs Convention.’ Ler Lucy Brick. ‘ ® 5 eral Banp. — Air: ‘‘ Why don’t the men propose??? ee : The ‘* wreck of Burnham’s character ”? Aids Aids, caused by the powerful aper The “ Porte- The First Premium vy pow fu newsp' PE e. oF gi Fowls. assaults of one Monnaie Towe’em Tes Bre Minur, A.SS. pene. Banner. — Motto : “Don’t he feel bad !?? ** No - Poultry Fancier who had found out the at af Too far difference between a ‘‘ Cochin-China’’ and a gone ! «¢ Shanghae.’? Unpaid Delinquent subscribers to northern Farmers, 2 Disappointed Compositors. twelve deep, and three miles long ! “ Press Gang.” Marshal. [ The ‘‘ editor,’’ suffering from a severe attack of roup. ] Marshal. Day. ; Dr. Bangit, with the unsold copies of his Poultry-Book, } Gora, in a huge baggage-wagon, drawn by 14 horses. uj A battalion of victims to the Hen Rever, who had Pn 18 ge of bought eggs that “didn’t hatch,’’ and who Ratha Charity. were waiting. patiently to have their money Insane returned! Poor. My legal friend (on a mule) who promised d Marshal and to spend a thousand dollars in prosecuting | Jail Keeper Deputy Sheriff. me for selling him Shanghue eggs for 4 Constables. Cochin-Chinas ! 316 THE HISTORY OF Aid, § Fat Johnny Jiles, with the head of a pure ‘* Black i Aid, Barnam. Spanish ’’ crower on a salver. Burnum. The men who did n’t take the first premiums Marshals. (when I was round) at the Poultry-Shows ¢ Marshals. 4 (in deep mourning). - 2 nt political remains of Frank Pierce, in af Aids, Aids, A “Cabinet” toy wheelbarrow, with Banner, on a His own of Curiosities. @ ** sharp stick.”? Motto: ‘* Veto.” Opinions ¢ 5 Victims who purchased Minor’s Aia, m aise in ‘ «Patent Cross-grained Collat- Gen. Bangir, ftorthum Farmer. eral Beehives,’’? with Motto: of the “Burned child dreads the fire.?? } “ Nauvoo Legion.” : Customers for “‘Ozier Willow,” wes teats a in two sections, one man deep. * (Banner. — Motto: ‘* I rather guess not!’ A huge concourse of “* Copper Stock’? and “ Agewuth Land ”*’ owners, in deep sables. + Foti Banp.— Air: Dead March. Banner. — Motto: “You ’re sure to win —if you don’t lose !’? (&S" A smooth-skinned pure ‘‘ Suffolk’? Pig, imported. Twenty-four Sewing Machines, ‘* warranted.”? Aid, President of the ‘‘Porte-Monnaiz I ows ’EM Aid, Secretary. Company,’’ as Richard ILI. on horseback. Treasurer. Nine ‘‘ Bother’em Pootrums,’’ rampant. Aids, The Victims. Marshals. ; } Marshals. The few ( The identical lot of “* pure-bred ’? fowls that Bangit, The unlucky Plarsterd, Minor, Humm & Co., imported (over esa Buyers. the left) <‘ for the Southern market,” in 1853 ! ‘story ! The Hen that lays two eggs a day ! Treasurer of the ‘‘ Mut. Adm’n Society.”” Defunct Hucksters, in a tip-cart. Four empty Hen-Coops, on wheels. (= Breeders of pure Alderney cattle ! _&}} _ who furnish Pedigrees with long tails. An effigy of the Lasr Man that will buy Shanghae chickens (in a strait-jacket),, Police ( Purchasers of Live Stock who bought of my competitors; ) snerig and » With Banner. and Aids. Motto: ‘* We got more than we bargained for !”? posse The Hen-Men who “‘ pity Poor Burnham.’? My Own Casu Cusromers, 10,000 strong F- CAVALCADE. ‘‘THE PEOPLE,”’ Music, And the rest of Mankind, ete, THE HEN FEVER. 817 The scene was closing! That immense concourse of -humbugs and humbugged had passed on, and I was alone once more. But, a moment afterwards, I saw the head and face of a comical and good-humored looking Yankee (just . beneath the window), who was in the act of puffing into the air a huge budget of bubbles, that danced and floated in the atmosphere for a brief moment, and which, bursting, sud- denly awoke me. Here is a sketch of the finale. \ E i. ce B (one YZ ips. 1g £K Udy ° * AWMERN AEN Co OF FM gel \ cose (aston Sart fy fh ‘| ius) ; howd nn \ Le ae tens NEY i.)