Cornell University THE CALDWELL COLLECTION THE GIFT OF THE FAMILY OF GEORGE CHAPMAN CALDWELL TO THE DEPARTMENT OF CHEMISTRY whose senior Professor he was from 1868 to 1903 4513 Cornell University Libra Ti Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924003016734 THE MICROSCOPE: REVELATIONS. WORKS BY DR. CARPENTER. i PRINCIPLES OF COMPARATIVE PHYSIOLOGY. A New American, FRoM THE FourtH anp Revisep Loxpon Enition. With more than three hundred beautiful illustrations. In one large and hand- some octavo volume of 752 pages. Without pretending to it, it is an Ency- | could have brought to so successful an issue clopzdia of the subject, accurate and com- | as Dr. Carpenter. We feel that this ab- plete in all respects—a truthful reflection | stract can give the reader a very imperfect of the advanced state at which the science | idea of the fulness of this work, and no has now arrived—Dublin Quarterly Jour- | idea of its unity, of the admirable manner nal of Medical Science. in which material has been brought, from A truly magnificent work—in itself a | the most various sources, to conduce to its perfect physiological study.—Ranking’s | completeness, of the lucidity of the reason- Abstract. ing it contains, or of the clearness of lan- This work stands without its fellow. It | guage in which the whole is clothed.— is one, few men in Europe could have | Medical Times. undertaken ; itis one, no man, we believe, Ii. PRINCIPLES OF HUMAN PHYSIOLOGY. WITH THEIR CHIEF APPLICATIONS TO PSYCHOLOGY, PATHOLOGY, THERAPEUTICS, HYGIENE, AND FORENSIC .MEDICINE. A new American, from the last and revised London Edition, with nearly three hundred illustrations. Edited, with additions, by F. Gurney Smith, M.D. In one large and handsome volume of about nine hundred pages. The most complete work on the science A complete cyclopeedia of this branch of in our language.—.4m. Med. Journal. science—NV. Y. Med. Times. The most complete work now extant in The most complete exposition of physio- our language—N. O. Med. Register. logy which any language can at present The best text-book in the language on | give—Brit. and For. Med.-Chirurg. Review. this extensive subject.— London Med. Times. I. ELEMENTS (OR MANUAL) OF PHYSIOLOGY. INCLUDING PHYSIOLOGICAL ANATOMY. Second American, from the last and revised London Edition, with one hundred and ninety illustrations. In one handsome octavo volume of 566 pages. In his former works it would seem that Those who have occasion for an elemen- he had exhausted the subject of Physiology. | tary treatise on Physiology, cannot do bet- In the present, he gives the essence, as it | ter than to possess themselves of the manual were, of the whole.—N. Y. Journal of | of Dr. Carpenter.—Medical Examiner. Medicine. PREPARING PRINCIPLES OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY, including ORGANIC CHEM. ISTRY, and HISTOLOGY. With a general sketch of the Vegetable and Animal Kingdoms. With several hundred illustrations. In one large and handsome octavo volume. In his last edition of the ‘Comparative Physiology” and ‘Human Physiology,” the author found it desirable to omit the chapters connected with “ General Physio- logy.” He has therefore undertaken to prepare a volume devoted exclusively to that subject, forming an introduction to the other works, or, taken in conjunction ihe ee constituting a complete and extended system of Physiology, in all its ranches. THE MICROSCOPE: AND ITS REVELATIONS, BY WILLIAM B. CARPENTER, M.D., F.R.S., F.G.S., dh siece IN PHYSIOLOGY AND COMPARATIVE ANATOMY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON ; PROFESSOR, OF MEDICAL JURISPRUDENCE IN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE ; PRESID OF THE MICROSCOPICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON; ETC. WITH AN APPENDIX CONTAINING THE AfPLications OF THE MICROSCOPE TO CLINICAL MEDICINE, ETC. BY FRANCIS GURNEY SMITH, M.D., PROFESSOR OF THE INSTITUTES OF MEDICINE IN THE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT OF PENNSYLVANIA COLLEGE, ETC. ILLUSTRATED BY FOUR HUNDRED AND THIRTY-FOUR Gngrabings on Wood. PHILADELPHIA: BLANCHARD AND LEA. 1856. ~) Cuno C28] CUlboy Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1856, BY BLANCHARD AND LEA, In the Clerk's Office of the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. C. SHERMAN & SON, PRINTERS, 19 St. James Street. PREFACE TO THE AMERICAN EDITION. Tue American Edition of Dr. Carpenter’s Work has been reprinted with the Author’s sanction, from advance sheets fur- nished by him to.the American publishers. In assuming the supervision of the press, the Editor has been careful to leave the work as it came from the Author’s hands. Such additions as seemed most required by the Students of this country have been made in the form of an Appendix. The reader will find Dr. Carpenter’s reasons for omitting the Clinical Applications of the Microscope, fully detailed in his Preface; but as the various works on this subject are not readily accessible on this side of the Atlantic, it was thought that a selection from them, in a compendious form, might enhance the usefulness of the work. Free use has been made, therefore, of the excellent manuals of Beale and Bennett; and the various kindred treatises and jour- nals have also been drawn upon. All that this portion of the work claims is to present a general view of those subjects which seem to be most required by the student of the Microscope. The growing interest in this important field of inquiry will, it is hoped, afford sufficient apology for its introduction. v1 PREFACE TO THE AMERICAN EDITION. A short account of American Microscopes, their modifications and accessories, has also been added, and the whole Appendix has been fully illustrated, through the liberality of the Pub- lishers, by the addition of upwards of one hundred wood- engravings. Francis Gurney Situ, M.D. 428 Watnout STREET, June, 1856. PREFACE. THE rapid increase which has recently taken place in the use of the Microscope,—both as an instrument of scientific research, and as a means of gratifying a laudable curiosity and of obtain- ing a healthful recreation,—has naturally led to a demand for information, both as to the mode of employing the instrument and its appurtenances, and as to the objects for whose minute examination it is most appropriate. And as none of the existing Treatises, either British or Foreign, on the Microscope and its Uses, have seemed to the Author fully adapted to meet this demand (some of them being almost exclusively concerned with the Microscope itself, and others with some special branch or branches of Microscopic study), he has felt encouraged to carry out a plan which he had formed several years since; by endea- voring to combine, within a moderate compass, that information in regard to the use of his ‘tools’ which is most essential to the working Microscopist, with such an account of the objects best fitted for his study, as might qualify him to comprehend what he observes, and might thus prepare him to benefit science, whilst expanding and refreshing his own mind. In his account of the various forms of Microscopes and Acces- sory Apparatus, the Author has not attempted to describe every- thing which is in use in this country; still less, to go into details respecting the construction of foreign instruments. He is satis- fied that in all which relates both to the mechanical and the optical arrangements of their instruments, the chief English Microscope-makers are decidedly in advance of their Conti- nental rivals; and on this point he speaks not only from his own conviction, but from the authority of a highly accomplished German Microscopist, who has recently visited London for the vill PREFACE. express purpose of making the comparison. Even among the products of English skill, it was necessary for him to make a selection ; and he trusts that he will be found to have done ade- quate justice to all those who have most claim to an honorable mention. The great objection to English Microscopes, especially on the western side of the Atlantic, seems to be their costliness; and as it can be affirmed with truth, that the instruments of Nachet, Oberhauser, and other Continental makers, are adequate for all essential purposes, a general preference is given to the latter (as the Author understands) among the Microscopists of the United States. He feels sure, however, that no one who has ever been accustomed to work with a well-constructed English Microscope will ever give the preference to a foreign instrument; and he is glad to be able to announce that one of the best London firms is now prepared to supply a Microscope of excellent quality at a price very little exceeding that paid for Continental instruments, of far superior capabilities. (See p. 1038, note.) In treating of the Applications of the Microscope, the Author has constantly endeavored to meet the wants of those who come to the study of the minute forms of Animal and Vegetable life with little or no previous scientific preparation, but who desire to gain something more than a mere sight of the objects to which their observation may be directed. Some of these may perhaps object to the general tone of his work as too highly pitched, and may think that he might have rendered his descriptions simpler by employing fewer scientific terms. But he would reply to such, that he has had much opportunity of observing, among the votaries of the Microscope, a desire for such information as he has attempted to convey (of the extent of which desire, the success of the “ Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science” is a very gratifying evidence); and that the use of scientific terms cannot be dispensed with, since there are no others in which the facts can be expressed. As he has made a point of explaining these, in the places where they are first introduced, he cannot think that any of his readers need find much difficulty in appre- hending their meaning. The proportion of space allotted to the various departments, has been determined, not so much by their Physiological im- portance, as by their special interest to the Microscopist; and the remembrance of this consideration will serve to account for PREFACE. ix much that might otherwise appear strange. The Author has thought it particularly needful to restrain himself, in treating of certain very important subjects which are fully discussed in trea- tisey expressly devoted to them (such, for example, as the struc- ture of Insects, and the Primary Tissues of Vertebrata), in order that he might give more space to those on which no such sources of information are readily accessible. For the same reason he has omitted all reference to the applications of the Microscope to Pathological inquiry; a subject which would interest only one division of his readers, and on which it would have been impossible for him to compress, within a sufficiently narrow compass, a really useful summary of what such readers can readily learn elsewhere. So again, the application of the Micro- scope to the detection of Adulterations in Food, &c., is a topic of such a purely special character, and must be so entirely based on detailed descriptions of the substances in question, that he has thought it better to leave this also untouched. It has been the Author's object throughout, to guide the pos- sessor of a Microscope to the intelligent study of any department of Natural History, that his individual tastes may lead him to follow out, and his particular circumstances may give him faci- lities for pursuing. And he has particularly aimed to show, under each head, how small is the amount of reliable knowledge already acquired, compared with that which remains to be attained by the zealous and persevering student. Being satis- fied that there is a large quantity of valuable Microscope “power at present running to waste in this country,—being applied in such desultory observations as are of no service whatever to science, and of very little to the mind of the observer,—he will consider the labor he has bestowed upon the production of this Manual as well repaid, if it should tend to direct this power to more systematic labors, in those fertile fields which only await the cultivator to bear abundant fruit. In all that concerns the working of the Microscope, the Author has mainly drawn upon his own experience, which dates back almost to the time when Achromatic Object-glasses were first constructed in this country. He would be ungrateful, however, if he were not to acknowledge that he has derived many valu- able hints from the Practical Treatises of Mr. Quekett and Dr. Beale, and from the Micrographic Dictionary of Messrs. Griffith and Henfrey. And among the works by which he has been x PREFACE, specially aided in treating of the Applications of the instrument, he would especially name Mr. Quekett’s valuable Lectures on Histology (Vegetable and Animal), Mr. Ralfs’s beautiful Mono- graph on the British Desmidiex, Prof. W. Smith’s on the Diato- mace (which will, when complete, be quite worthy to take rank with the preceding), and the Micrographic Dictionary. All the Illustrations have been drawn by Mr. W. Bagg, and have been engraved under his superintendence; and the Author ventures to affirm, that for fidelity as well as for beauty of execution, they will bear comparison with any Microscopic de- lineations yet executed on wood. A large proportion of the subjects are original ; the sources of all that are not so, are spe- cified in the list (p. xvii). The Author feels that some apology is due for the long delay which has attended the appearance of this work. When it was first announced as forthcoming, his full intention was to apply himself immediately to its production; but the unexpected de- mand for new editions of his two large Treatises on Physiology, required that the whole of his disposable time and attention should be given up during two years to carrying these through the press. When he at last found himself free to apply himself to the “Microscope,” he fully expected that the forward state of his preparations would enable him to complete it by October, 1855. But in this expectation he has been disappointed by the occurrence of two severe attacks of indisposition, which com- pelled him for a time to suspend all mental exertion, and have rendered it necessary for him carefully to abstain from overtask- ing himself; so that he feels assured that those who have kindly waited for the appearance of this volume, will not, when ac- quainted with these circumstances, blame him for a delay, the causes of which have lain so completely beyond his control. University Haut, Lonpon, Feb. 9, 1856. TABLE OF CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION. History of the Microscope and Microscopic Research, ; CHAPTER I. Optical Principles of the Microscope, CHAPTER II. CONSTRUCTION OF THE MICROSCOPE. General Principles, . 5 . . . Simple Microscopes, ‘ ‘ . Ross's, 5 Gairdner’s, . : ‘ ‘ ‘ . Field’s, Quekett’s, Compound Microscopes, Field’s, Highley’s, Nachet’s, . 3 . . Smith and Beck’s Student’s, Do. Dissecting, Warington’s Universal, . : 5 . Ross’s, 5 ‘ Powell and Lealand’s Smith and Beck’s, Nachet’s Binocular, CHAPTER III. ACCESSORY APPARATUS. Draw-Tube, Erector, Micrometer, Goniometer, . : i : Indicator, Camera Lucida, Object-Glass Holder, . PAGE 33 65 xii CONTENTS. Object-Marker, Lever Stage, . ; : : : : Object-Finder, Magnetic Stage, Diaphragm-Plate, Achromatic Condenser, Reflecting Prisms, . White-Cloud Iuminator, Oblique Illuminators, Black-Ground Illuminators, Polarizing Apparatus, Tuminators for Opaque Orjects, Stage-Forceps, . Glass Stage-Plate, . ‘ Aquatic Box, . : 5 ‘ . . E Zoophyte Trough, Compressorium, Dipping-Tubes, Forceps, . . . ‘ ‘ . CHAPTER IV. MANAGEMENT OF THE MICROSCOPE. Support, : ‘ : . : 5 Light, . . ‘ ‘i Position of die: Care of the Eyes, . Care of the Microscope, General Arrangements, : Arrangement for Transparent Objects, Arrangement for Opaque Objects, Errors of Interpretation, Comparative Values of Object- GTassees Test- Objects, Determination of Magnifying Power, : . CHAPTER V. PREPARATION, MOUNTING, AND COLLECTION OF OBJECTS. ‘Microscopic Dissection, Cutting Sections of Soft Sulistanees,, Cutting Sections of Harder Substances, Grinding and Polishing of ee Chemical Actions, Glass Slides, Thin Glass, Varnishes and Cements, . Mousting Objects Dry, ‘ Mounting Objects in Canada Balsam, . ‘i Preservative Fluids, . : , Mounting Objects in Fluid, Cement-Cells, Thin-Glass Cells, PAGE 127 128 129 130 131 131 133 134 135 138 140 143 146 147 148 149 150 152 153 154 154 157 158 159 160 168 175 180 192 199 201 204 205 207 211 214 214 217 221 224 232 234 235 236 CONTENTS. Plate-Glass and Shallow Cells, ‘ i : ‘ : Deep and Built-up Cells, . . F . * ‘ . Mounting Objects in Cells, . . . . . . Importance of Cleanliness, . . : . . . Labelling and Preserving of Objects, : . 7 ; Collection of Objects, . ; : . . : ; CHAPTER VI. MICROSCOPIC FORMS OF VEGETABLE LIFE.—PROTOPHYTES, Boundary between Animal and Vegetable a al Characters of Vegetable Cell, . : . . Life-History of Simplest Protophytes Volvocines, Fi . : d : Desmidiacez, . . : > ‘i Diatomacez, Palmellacez, . . : : . . . Ulvacese, . A ‘ F é : : : . Oscillatoriacez, é : : . 7 Siphonacez, : c : . . Confervacee, Conjugatez, : - . : . . Chatophoracee, Batrachospermez, : . z : . : . Characez, CHAPTER VII. MICROSCOPIC STRUCTURE OF HIGHER CRYPTOGAMIA. Alge, ‘ : : 7 : . Lichens, . Fungi, Hepatic, Mosses, : . ‘ . : . Ferns, . : : 7 Equisetacee, . : ‘ : ‘i . i: CHAPTER VIII. MICROSCOPIC STRUCTURE OF PHANEROGAMIC PLANTS. Elementary Tissues, . Structure of Stem and Root, Structure of Cuticle and Leaves, Structure of Flowers, . A 5 ‘ CHAPTER IX. MICROSCOPIC FORMS OF ANIMAL LIFE:—-PROTOZOA}; ANIMALCULES. Protozoa, , . . Rhizopoda, i : ‘ Infusoria, : : s ‘i . . Rotifera, . 5 fi . 3 Fi : ‘ . xiv CONTENTS. CHAPTER X. FORAMINIFERA, POLYCYSTINA, AND SPONGES. Foraminifera, Polycystina, Sponges, CHAPTER XI. ZOOPHYTES. Hydra, Hydrozoa, Acalepha, Anthozoa, CHAPTER XII. ECHINODERMATA. Structure of Shell and Spines, Echinoderm Larve, CHAPTER XIII. POLYZOA AND COMPOUND TUNICATA. Polyzoa, . Compound Tunicata, CHAPTER XIV. MOLLUSCOUS ANIMALS GENERALLY. Shells of Mollusca, Tongues of Gasteropods, . Development of Gasteropods, Ciliary motion on Gills, Organs of Sense of Mollusks, Chromatophores of Cephalopods, CHAPTER XV. ANNULOSA OR WORMS. Entozoa, Turbellaria, Annelida, CHAPTER XVI. CRUSTACEA. Pycnogonide, Entomostraca, Suctoria, Cirrhipeda, Shell of Decapoda, Metamorphosis of Decapoda, PAGE 436 449 452 457 461 467 472 ATT 486 492 500 506 517 521 526 527 528 527 533 535 539 541 547 548 550 551 CONTENTS. CHAPTER XVII. INSECTS AND ARACHNIDA. Great number and variety of Objects afforded by Insects, Structure of Integument, . ‘ ‘ ‘ Tegumentary Appendages, Parts of the Head, a Circulation of the Blood, Respiratory a al Wings, Feet, Stings and Oripositore, Eggs, : Acarida, : Parts of Spiders, . . CHAPTER XVIII. VERTEBRATED ANIMALS. Primary Tissues, Bone, Teeth, . 2 . . Scales of Fish, = . . Hairs, . . : Feathers, . . . . Hoofs, Horns, &c., £ : ‘i F Blood, : : : White and Yellow Fibres, : Skin, Mucous, and Serous Membranes, Epidermis, . . : Pigment-Cells, : ‘ . Epithelium, Fat, . Cartilage, A 3 2 . Glands, 3 . . . . . Muscle, : Nerve, Circulation of the Blood, Injected Preparations, Vessels of Respiratory Organs, CHAPTER XIX. APPLICATIONS OF THE MICROSCOPE TO GEOLOGY. Fossilized Wood, Coal, Fossil Foraminifera, Chalk, Nummulites, Orbitoides, j Organic materials of Rocks, ‘ Structure of Fossil Bones, Teeth, &c., XV PAGE 554 555 556 561 569 570 574 576 578 579 581 583 584 584 588 591 594 597 598 598 602 604 605 605 606 607 608 609 611 614 616 619 624 625 631 634 637 639 641 Xvi CONTENTS. CHAPTER XX. INORGANIC OR MINERAL KINGDOM.—POLARIZATION. PAGE Mineral objects, ‘ : . : : ‘ F . 644 Crystallization of Salis, . : ; : ; P : 645 Objects suitable for Polariscope, . : F ‘ j . 645 APPENDIX. Microscope as a means of Diagnosis, : . : - 650 Examination of the Nervous System, . Z . : : 653 Muscular System, 2 : ‘ . » 655 Respiratory System, : : . ‘ 657 Morbid Lung, : . ‘ F . 658 Examination of the @lacdatar System, ‘ 4 ‘ ‘ : 662 Liver, : . : : : 3 : . - 662 Kidney, . ‘ é : i F : : : 663 Morbid Kidney, : . : . : . . - 664 Salivary Glands, . ‘ : ; . . . 664 Thymus and Thyroid Glands : , 5 a . . 664 Adipose Tissue, . . : . : : : 664 Fatty Degeneration, . Q 5 : . 665 Examination of Vaséular ae Mose sates : : , 666 Skin, Mucous and Serous Membrane, : j . 667 The Eye, : : : : 671 The Hard eeiee ‘ 7 7 : . - 672 Morbid Growths, F i ‘ : 2 674 Animal Fluids, . 4 F : . - 681 Serous and Dropsical Fluids, - : . : . . 699 Injections, . : ; . : - 700 Microscopes a ineneal Nianpbiekirs: ; : : : , 704 OOIMONRYEN LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS, . Refraction of Parallel Rays by Plano-convex Lens, Ditto by Double-convex Lens, . Refraction of Converging Rays, . Refraction of Diverging Rays, . Formation of Images by Convex Lenses, - Spherical Aberration, . . Chromatic Aberration, . Section of the Achromatic Object. glass, . Effect of Covering-glass, - Action of Simple Microscope, . Simplest form of Compound Microscope, - Complete Compound Microscope, . Huyghenian Eye-piece, . : . Ross’s Simple Microscope, . Gairdner’s Simple Microscope, . . Field’s Simple Microscope, . - Quekett’s Dissecting Microscope, . Field’s Compound Microscope, . Highley’s Hospital Microscope, . Nachet’s Compound Microscope, . Smith and Beck’s Student’s Microscope, Ditto Dissecting Microscope, . Warington’s Universal Microscope, Ditto Ditto, . Ditto Ditto, Ditto Ditto, - Ross’s Large Compound Microscope, . . Powell and Lealand’s Ditto, . . Smith and Beck's Ditto, . Arrangement of Binocular Prisms, . - Nachet’s Binocular Microscope, . . Draw-tube with Erector, 3. Jackson’s Hye-piece Micrometer, . Microscope arranged for Drawing, . 35. Ross’s Achromatic Condenser, . . Smith and Beck’s Ditto, - Powell and Lealand’s Ditto, . . White-Cloud ee . Amici’s Prism, . Parabolic Illuminator, . Fitting of Polarizing Prism, . Fitting of Analyzing Prism, 43. Selenite Object-Carrier, . 44, Bull’s-Kye Condennen . 45. Ordinary Condensing Lens, 46. Side Reflector, 7 . XV LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 52. 53. 54, 55. 56. 57. 58. 59. 60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. . Built-up Cells, . Palmoglea macrococca, after Braun, . Protococcus pluvialis, after Cohn, . Volvox globator, after Ehrenberg, . Development of Volvox, after Williamson, . . Various species of Staurastrum, after Ralfs, . Closterium lunula, after 8S. G. Osborne, . Development of Pediastrum granulatum, after Braun, . Various forms of Pediastrum, after Ralfs, . f . Conjugation of Cosmarium botrytis, after Ralfs, Stage-Forceps, : ‘ - . Aquatic Box, : F : . : é Zoophyte-Trough, Compressorium, ; Dipping-Tubes, . . Forceps, . ‘ Section of Adjusting Object- Glass, Arrangement of Microscope for Transparent Objects, Ditto Ditto Opaque Objects, Spring Scissors, : : : Curved Scissors, 4 ‘ ‘ Valentin’s Knife, Section-Instrument, : : . . Lever of Contact, Slider-Forceps, Spring-Press, Turn-Table, : Plate-glass Cells, ‘ . ‘i : Tube-Cells, . F a ‘ . . Ditto of Closterium, after Ralfs, . Didymoprium Grevillii, after Ralfs, . Portion of Isthmia nervosa, after Smith, . Triceratium favus, after Smith, ‘ . Pleurosigma angulatum, after Wenham, . Biddulphia pulchella, after Smith, . Conjugation of Epithemia, after Thwaites, . 3. Conjugation of Au/acosetra, after Thwaites, . Actinocyclus undulatus, after Smith, . Heliopelta, : . Arachnoidiscus Ehrenbergii, after Smith, . Campylodiscus costatus, after Smith, . Surirella constricta, after Smith, . Gomphonema geminatum, after Smith, . Ditto, more highly magnified, after ‘Smith, . Liemophora flabellata, after Smith, ‘ . Meridion circulare and Bacilluria ‘paradoxa, after Smith, . Achnanthes longipes, after Smith, . Diatoma vulgare, after Smith, . . Grammatophora serpentina, after Smith, ; . Isthmia nervosa, after Smith, . Meloseira subflexilis, after Smith, . Meloseira varians, after Smith, . Mastogloia Smithit, after Smith, . Mastogloia lanceolata, after Smith, . Fossil Diatomacee from Oran, after Ehrenberg, 2. Fossil Diatomacee from Mourne Mountain, after r Bhrenberg, 3. Hematococcus sanguineus, after Hassal, ; . Development of Ulva, after Kiitzing, . Zoospores of Ulva, after Thuret, . Zoospores of Achlya, after Unger, : . Cell-multiplication of Conferva, after Mohl, PAGE 147 148 150 151 152 153 165 169 117 203 204 205 206 216 226 227 236 238 239 240 251 254 259 262 266 267 271 272 274 275 275 280 281 282 283 "285 286 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 296 297 298 298 298 299 299 300 300 302 304 308 309 310 316 318 108. 109. 110. lil. 112. 113. 114. 115. 116. 117, 118, 119, 120. 12). 122. 123. 124. 125. 126. 127, 128, 129. 130. 131. 132. 133. 134, 135. 136, 137. 138. 139. 140. 141, 142. 143. 144, 145. 146. 147. 148. 149, 150. 151, 152. 153. 154, 155. 156, 157. 158. 159. 160. 161, 162. 163. 164. 165. 166, 167. 168. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS, Zygnema quininum, after Kiitzing, : . . Cheetophora elegans, after Thuret, Batrachospermum moniliforme, . Nitella flexilis, after Slack, . : Antheridia of Chara, after Thuret, Mesogloia vermicularis, after Payer, Sphacelaria cirrhosa, Receptacle of Fucus, after Thuret, Antheridia and antherozoids of Fucus, after Thuret, Tetraspores of Carpocaulon, after Kiitzing, Torula Cerevisic, after Mandl, 3 Sarcina ventricult, after Robin, Botrytis bassiana, after Robin, Enterobryus spiralis, after Leidy, Structure of Hnterobryus, after Leidy, Fungoid Vegetation, from Passulus, after Leidy, Stysanus caput-meduse, after Payer Puccinia graminis, . Heidium tussilaginis, after Payer, Clavaria crispula, after Payer, : Fructification of Marchantia, after Payer, Stomata of Marchantia, after Mirbel, Conceptacles of Marchantia, after Mirbel, Archegonia of Marchantia, after Payer, Elater and spores of Marchantia, after Payes Portion of Leaf of Sphagnum, Structure of Mosses, after Jussieu, Antheridia and antherozoids of Polytrichum, after Thuret, . Mouth of Capsule of Funaria, Peristome of Fontinalis, after Payer, Ditto of Bryum, | ditto, Ditto of Cinclidium, ditto, Petiole of Fern, . Sori of Polypodium, after Payer, Ditto of Hemionitis, ditto, Sorus and Indusium of Aspidium, . Ditto of Deparia, after Payer, . Development of Prothallium of Pteris, after Suminski, Antheridia and antherozoids of Preris, after Suminski, Archegonium of Pteris, after Suminski, Spores of Hquisetum, after Payer, Section of leaf of Agave, after Hartig, Section of Aralia (rice-paper), Stellate Parenchyma of Rush, Cubical parenchyma of Nuphar, Circulation in hairs of Tradescantia, after Slack, Testa of Star-Anise, ‘ Section of Cherry-stone, Section of Coquilla-nut, . Spiral cells of Oncidium, Spiral fibres of Collomia, Cells of Paony, filled with starch, Starch-grains, under polarized light, Glandular fibres of Coniferous Wood, : Vascular tissue of Italian Reed, after Schleiden, Transverse Section of stem of Palm, Ditto of Wanghie Cane, Ditto of Clematis, Ditto of Cedar, Ditto of Buckthorn, Ditto Ditto more highly magnified, xix PAGE 820 321 322 323 325 327 329 329 330 332 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 345 346 347 348 349 349 350 351 351 351 B51 352 353 353 354 354 355 356 357 358 361 362 362 362 366 367 368 368 369 369 370 370 373 374 377 377 379 379 380 380 xX 169. 170. tri. 172. 173. 174, 175. 176. *177. 178. 179. 180. 181. 182. 183. 184, 185. 186. 187. 188. 189. 190. 191. 192. 193. 194. 195. 196. 197. 198. 199, 200. 201. 202. 203. 204. 205. 206. 207. 208. 209. 210. #11, 212. 213. 214. 215. 216. 21%, 218. 219. 220. 221, 292. 223. 224, 225. 226. 20%. 228. 229, LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. Transverse Section of Hazel, i Ditto of Fossil Conifer, Vertical section of Fossil Conifer, radial, Ditto Ditto, tangential, Ditto of Mahogany, é Transverse Section of Fossil-wood, . Vertical Section of Ditto, i 7 Transverse Section of Fossil-wood, . Vertical Section Ditto, ‘ Transverse Section of Aristolochia, (?) Ditto of eyeeh Cuticle of Yucca, Ditto of Indian Cor ny Ditto of Apple, after Brongniart, . Ditto of Rochea, Vertical Section of leaf of Rochea, after ‘Bronguiart, Cuticle of Lrés, Ditto, Vertical Section of leaf of Tris, Ditto, Longitudinal Section of ditto, Ditto, Cuticle of Petal of Geranium, ; Pollen-grains of Althea, &c., Seeds of Poppy, &e., Amaba princeps, after Ehrenberg, Actinophrys sol, after Clarapéde, Various forms of Rhizopods, after Ebrenber . Kerona silurus, after Milne-Edwards, Paramecium caudatum, Ditto, . Group of Vorticella, after Ehrenberg, Fissiparous Multiplication of Chilodon, after Ehrenberg, Metamorphoses of Vorticella, after Stein, Ditto of Trichoda, after Haime, Brachionus pala, after Milne-Edwards, Rotifer vulgaris, after Ehrenberg, : Stephanoceros Eichornii, Ditto, ? 7 , Noteus quadricornis, Ditto, . Gromia oviformis, after Schulze, Rosalina ornata, after Schulze, Orbitolites complanatus, Animal of simple type of ditto, Animal of complex type of ditto, Section of Faujusina, after Williamson, Podocyrtis Schomburgkii, after Ehrenberg, Rhopalocanium ornatum, Ditto, Haliomma Humboldtii, Ditto, . Perichlamydium preetextumn, Ditto, Polycystina from Barbadoes, Ditto, : ge te Stylodictya gracilis, Ditto, Astromma Aristotelis, Ditto, Structure of Grantia, after Dobie, Portion of Hulichondri ia, Siliceous spicules of Pachymatisma, Hydra fusca, after Milne-Edwards, Ditto in gemmation, after Trembley, Medusa-buds of Syncoryna, after Sars, Campanularia gelatinosa, after Van Beneden, Sertularia cupressina, after Johnston, Thaumantias pilosella, after E. Forbes, ‘ Development of Medusa-buds, after Dalyell. Development of Meduse, Ditto, . - Cydippe and Beroe, after Milne-Edwards, Noctilucu miliaris, after Quatrefages, 230. 231. 232. 233. 234, 235. 236. 237. 238. 239. 240. 241. 242, 243. 244, 245. 246. 247, 248. 249. 250. 251. 252. 253. 254, 255. 256. 257. 258. 259. 260. 261. 262. 263. 264. 265. 266. 267. 268. 269. 270. 271. 272. 273. 274. 275. 276. 277, 278. 279. 280. 281. 282. 283. 284, 285. 286. 287. 288. 289. 290. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. Spicules of Alcyonium and Gorgonia, . Ditto of Gorgonia guttata, Spicules of Muricea elongata, . Filiferous capsules of Actinia, &c., after Gosse, Section of Shell of Hchinus, Calcareous reticulation of Spine of Echinus, Ambulacral disk of Echinus, Transverse Section of Spine ‘of Acrocladia, . Spines of Spatangus, . : Calcareous skeleton of Astrophyton, Ditto of Holothuria, Ditto of Synapia, Ditto ‘of Chirodota, Bipinnarian larva of Starfish, after Muller, . Pluteus-larva of Echinus, after Miller, . Cells of Lepralie, after Johnston, Laguncula repens, after Van Beneden, . Bird’s-head processes of Cellularia and Bugula, after Johnston and Busk, Amaroucium proliferum, after Milne- Edwards, Botryllus violaceus, Ditto Perophora, after Lister, . Transverse Section of Pinna, Membranous basis of Ditto Vertical Section of Ditto 2 Oblique Section of Ditto i 4 . Section of hinge-tooth of Mya, Nacre of Avicula, Tubular shell- structure of Anomia, . Vertical Section of shell of Unio, Internal surface of shell of Terebratula, External Ditto Ditto Vertical Sections of Ditto . : Horizontal Section of shell of Zerebratula bullata, Ditto Ditto of Megerlia lima, ‘ Ditto Ditto of Spiriferina rostrata, Palate of Helix hortensis, . : é Ditto of Zonites cellarius, Ditto of Trochus zizyphinus, Ditto of Doris tuberculata, Ditto of Buccinwm, under polarized light, . Embryoes of Nudibranchs, after Alder and Hancock, Embryonic development of Purpura, Latter stages of the same, Structure of Polycelis, after Quatrefages, Circulation of Terebella, after Milne-Edwards, . Ammothea pycnogonoides, after Quatrefages, Cyclops quadricornis, after Baird, . Development of Balanus, after Bate, Metamorphoses of Carcinus, after Couch, Scale of Morpho Menelaus, . Battledoor scale of Polyommatus argus, after r Quekett ‘ Scales of Podura plumbea, . . Hairs of Myriapod and Dermestes, . Head and eyes of Bee, Section of Kye of Melolontha, after Strauss- -Durekbeim, Antenna of Cockchafer, Portions of _ ditto more highly magnified Tongue of Fly, F Tongue, &c., of Honey Bee, Proboscis of Vanessa, Tracheal system of Nepa, after Milne- Edwards, Xxi PAGE 472 472 472 475 478 478 478 479 481 482 485 486 486 487 489 492 493 498 501 502 503 507 507 507 508 509 510 512 512 513 513 514 514 514 514 518 518 519 519 521 522 523 525 534 535 540 543 549 551 557 557 558 560 561 562 565 565 566 567 568 571 Xxil LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. PAGE 291. Trachew of Dytiscus, . r A . . . 571 292. Spiracle of Fly, . . : : : - 572 293. Spiracle of Larva of Cockchaffer, ; 2 ‘ . 5 572 294. Foot of Fly, after Hepworth, . . : . . SIT 295. Foot of Dytiscus, . : . . . : 517 296. Eggs of Insects, after Burmeister, : . . : - 580 297. Foot, with combs, of Spider, ; : . . 583 298. Ordinary and glutinous threads of Spider, : i: . - 583 299, Minute Structure of Bone, after Wilson, . 6 < ‘ 585 300. Lacune of Ditto, highly magnified, after Mand], : : - 586 301. Section of Bony scale of Lepidosteus, ‘ . : . 587 302. Vertical Section of Tooth of Lamna, after Owen, , ; - 588 303. Trausverse Ditto of Pristis, ditto, i . : 588 304. Ditto Ditto of Myliobates, F e . 589 305. Vertical Section of Human Tooth, after Mandl, | . : . 590 306. Portion of Skin of Sole, . é . . : . 592 307. Scale of Sole, : ‘ - 2 , j . 592 308. Hair of Musk-Deer, ‘ : i : ‘ ‘ - 595 309. Hair of Sable, . ‘ A . F ‘ 595 310. Hairs of Squirrel and Indian Bat, E : F : - 695 311. Transverse section of Hair of Pecari, 3 . . ‘ 595 312. Structure of Human Huir, after Wilson, 3 ‘ . » 596 313. Transverse section of Horn of Rhinoceros, . 2 : a 598 314. Blood-corpuscles of Frog, after Donne, . 3 ‘ ‘ . 599 315. Ditto of Man, Ditto, : . : 599 316. Fibrous Membrane of Egg-shell, ; A : . - 603 317. White Fibrous Tissue, : ‘ é : 3 1 603 318. Yellow Fibrous Tissue, . : . : . - 603 319. Pigment-cells of Choroid, after Henle, ‘i zi ‘ . 605 320. Pigment- cells of Tadpole, after Schwann, F j . . 606 321. Ciliated Epithelium, after Mandl, . : : : : 607 322. Areolar and Adipose Tissue, after Mandl, i: : i - 608 323. Cartilage of Ear of Mouse, . . : ‘ ‘ 609 324. Cartilage of Tadpole, after Schwann, . : 7 : - 609 325. Striated Muscular F Fibre, . 5 7 . a e 612 326. Ultimate fibrille of Ditto, s . 612 327. Capillary Circulation in Web of Frog og's foot, after Wagner ‘ 618 328. Intestinal villi of Monkey, : ‘ - 622 329. Various forms of Capillary network, after Berres, . : . 623 330. Portion of Gill of Hel, . ‘ ’ ; . 624 331. Interior of Lung of Frog, . z . : F ‘ 624 332. Section of Lung of Fowl, . : F : : . 625 333. Section of Human Lung, ‘ P 3 626 334. Microscopic organisms in Levant Mud, after Williamson, . 630 335. Ditto in Chalk from Gravesend, after Ehrenberg, 631 336. Ditto Ditto from Meudon, Ditto . . 632 337. Vertical section of Nimmutite, i ‘ Z Fi 635 338. Portion of Ditto, more highly magnified, ‘ - : . 636 339. Horizontal section of Ditto, . : . 637 340. Section of Orbitoides Prati parallel to its surface, ‘ : . 637 341. Portions of Ditto, more highly magnified, . - < : 638 342. Vertical section of Ditto, 3 $ 3 a . 638 343. Hye of Trilobite, after Buckland, é . é : 640 344. Section of Tooth of Labyr inthodon, after Owen, : ? . 641 345. Crystallized Silver, . : : 645 346. Oily Matter in Fibres of Brain (Todd and Bowman), ‘ ‘ . 653 347. Corpora Amylacea of Pineal Gland (Sieveking and Jones), A 654 348. Fatty Degeneration of Nerve-Fibre, : 3 ‘ 3 . 6-4 349. Striated Muscular Fibre, . ‘ : ‘ ' 654 350, Elongated Muscle-Cells nae Striated) i ; F . 656 351. Sarcolemma, j . . . : 656 352. 353. 354, 355. 356. 357. 358. 359. 360. 361. 362. 363. 364. 365. 366. 367. 368. 369, 370. 371. 372, 373. 374, 375. 376. 377. \ 378. 379. 380. 381. 382. 383. 384, 385. 386. \ 387, 388. 389. 390. 391. 392. 393, 394, 395. 396. 397. 398. 399. 400. 401. 402. 403, 404, 405, 406. 407. 408, 409, 410, 411, 412. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. Structure of Lung, . : . . Capillaries of Lung, . . . . Tubercle Corpuscles, . . : ‘ Yellow Tubercle (Bennett), Scrofulous Pus (Bennett), . F é . Section of Gray Granulations, Cretaceous and Cheesy Variety of Tubercle (Bennett), Pigmentary Matter mixed with Tubercle (Bennett), Structure of Tubercular Mass from Cerebellum, Tubercle Corpuscle from Lung, Plastic or Pyoid Corpuscle, : Granular Corpuscle from Cerebral Swelling, Corpuscles from Reticulum of Cancer, Lung in first Stage of Pneumonia (Da Costa), Ditto 2d Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto Ditto 3d Ditto Ditto . . Transverse Section of Lobule of Human Liver (Leidy), Hepatic Cells (Leidy), . 4 : ; Urine from tube and Epithelial Cell, Adipose Tissue, Fatty Degeneration of Vessels of Brain, Atheromatous Deposits in Vessels, . . Fibre-Cells passing into Fibres, Fibrous Tissue formed from Fibre-Cell, . Altered Epithelial Cells from Ulcer of Lip, Epithelial and Fibre-Cells from same, : Pus Corpuscles, _.. . i Ditto after Acetic Acid, Free Cancer Nuclei, . Polygonal Cancer-Cells eiscaatiteoss Caudate Cancer-Cells (Donaldson), Fusiform Cells, . - ‘ Concentric Cancer-Cells, Compound, a Mother Cell, . Agglomerated Nuclei (Donaldson), Corpuscles of Blood, Same after exposure to Air, . Colorless Corpuscles, Blood in Leucocythemia, Caudate Blood-Corpuscles, Milk and Colostrum-Granules, Healthy Milk-Globules, . Salivary Corpuscles, Epithelial Scales and Granules, Tubercle-Corpuscles (Bennett), ‘ Sputum of Calcareous Matter, Sputum in Acute Pneumonia, . Pus-Globules, Scrofulous Pus, . Mucous Corpuscles and Epithelium i in Urine, Secreting Canal and Epithelium from Kidney, . Mucus, Pus, Blood, and,Epithelium in Leucorrhea, Fibrinous Casts from Tubuli Uriniferi, . Ditto —_ Ditto Ditto in : Brights Disease Tube containing a Homogeneous Cast, ; Spermatozoa, . Torula from Urine of Diabetes, . XXIV LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. 413. Al4, 415. Al6. 417. 418. 419, 420. 421. 422. 423, 424. 425. 426. 427, 428, 429, 430. 431. 432. 433. 434. Oil-Globules from Urine, Lithic Acid Crystals, Various forms of Lithates, Crystal of Cystine, Oxalate of Lime, Same (various forms), Dumb-Bell Crystals, Urate of Ammonia, Triple Phosphate, Stellar form of Triple Phosphate, Starch Corpuscles after Partial Digestion, . Microscopic Appearance of Cancerous Juice from Urine, Fibres and Corpuscles from Ovarian Fluid,. Spencer’s Trunnion Microscope, Queen’s Student's Microscope, Grunow’s Student’s Microscope, : Ditto Ditto smaller size, Ditto first-class Microscope, . Diagram of Smith’s Inverted Microscope, Dr. J. L. Smith’s Inverted Microscope, . } Dr. J. L. Smith’s Goniometer and Micrometer, THE MICROSCOPE. INTRODUCTION. No one who attentively examines the progress of any depart- ment of Science, save such as are (like Mathematics or Meta- physics) of a purely abstract character, can fail to perceive how much it is dependent upon the perfection of its instruments. There are few instances, in fact, in which the invention of a new instrument, or the improvement of an old one, has not given a fresh stimulus to investigation ; even where it has done no more than afford that degree of precision to the results of inquiries already in progress, which alone could enable them to be made available as data for philosophical reasoning. But there are many cases in which such inventions or improvements have opened out entirely new paths of scientific research, leading to fertile fields of investigation whose very existence had been pre- viously unknown, to rich.mines of discovery whose treasures had lain uncared for because entirely unsuspected. A few examples of this general truth may not be inappropriate, by way of pre- face to the brief notice which it is intended to give in the present Introduction, of the most important epochs in the history, as well of the Microscope itself, as of its application to the purposes of scientific research. Thus in taking a retrospective survey of the history of Astro- nomy, we find that every great advance in our knowledge of the Celestial Universe, has been preceded by improvements, either in those instruments for measuring space and time, by which the places of the Heavenly Bodies are determined, the rate of their movements estimated, and a basis for the computation of their distances ascertained; or, again, in the telescope, by which our power of sight is so wonderfully augmented, that we are enabled, when gazing through it into the unfathomable depths of space, to take cognizance of world beyond world and system beyond system, whose remoteness cannot be expressed by any form of words that shall convey a distinct idea to the mind, and to bring the members of our own group within such visual proximity to 3 34 INTRODUCTION, ourselves, that we can scrutinize their appearance nearly as well] as if they had actually been brought a thousand times nearer to us. For it was the increased precision of celestial observations on the places and movements of the Planets, which furnished the data whereon Kepler was enabled to base his statement of the laws of their motion. It was the application of the pendulum to the measurement of short intervals of time, that enabled Galileo to ascertain the law of Falling Bodies. And it was not until the precise measurement of a degree upon the surface of the Earth had furnished the means of determining both its own diameter and its distance from the Moon, that Newton was enabled to verify and establish his grand conception, of the identity of that force which deflects the planets from a rectilineal course into elliptical orbits, with that which draws a stone to the ground; and thus to establish that Law of Universal Gravitation, which still remains the most comprehensive, as well as the most simple, of all the generalizations, within which the intellect of man has been able to comprehend the phenomena of Nature. So, again, it was only when the elder Herschel had developed new powers in the telescope, that Sidereal Astronomy could be pursued with any view much higher than that of mapping the distribution of the stars in the celestial sphere; and the present state of our knowledge of double, triple, and other combinations of stars, with their mutually adjusted movements, of the multiform clus- ters of luminous points which seem like repetitions of our own firmament in remote depths of space, and of those nebulous films which may be conceived to be new worlds and systems in pro- cess of formation, has only been rendered attainable by the im- provements which have been subsequently made in the construe- tion of that majestic instrument. If we glance at the mode in which the fabric of our existing Chemistry has been upreared, we at once see that it could not have attained its present elevation and stability, but for the in- strumentality of the perfected balance; by whose unerring indi- cations it was that the first decisive blow was given to the old “phlogistic” theory, that the foundation was laid for true ideas of chemical combination, that the Laws of that Combination were determined, and that the Combining Equivalents of different elementary substances were ascertained; and by whose means alone can any of those analytical researches be prosecuted, which are not only daily adding to our knowledge of the composition of the bodies which surround us, and suggesting the most im- portant applications of that knowledge to almost every depart- ment of the Arts of Life, but which are preparing a broad and secure foundation for a loftier and more comprehensive system of Chemical Philosophy. So, again, the balance of torsion, the ingenious invention of Cavendish and Coulomb, enables the Physical philosopher not merely to render sensible, but to subject to precise measurement VALUE OF INSTRUMENTS OF RESEARCH. 35 and subdivision, degrees of force that are far too fecble to affect the nicest balance of the ordinary construction, even if it were possible to bring them to act upon it; and strange as it may seem, it has been in such a balance that the Earth itself has been weighed, and that a basis has been thus afforded for the compu- tation of the weights of the different Planets and even of the Sun; whilst in the opposite direction it is employed to furnish those data in regard to the intensity of the electric and magnetic forces, on which alone can any valid theory of their operation be constructed. The galvanometer, again, in which the minutest Electric dis- turbances are rendered sensible by the deflection of the magnetic needle, has not only brought to light a vast class of most inte- resting electric changes which were previously unsuspected (one of the most remarkable of these being the existence of electric currents in the nerves of living animals, first ascertained by M. du Bois-Reymond), but has enabled those changes to be esti- mated with a marvellous amount of exactness; thus furnishing to observations made by its means, a precision which is quite unattainable in any other mode, and which is absolutely essential to the establishment of any valid theory of electric action. And this same instrument is scarcely less valuable, as serving, by a particular modification of it, for the detection and estimation of changes of Temperature far too minute to be measured by the ordinary thermometer; thus affording the requisite means of ex- actness to observation, in a department of science to which at first sight it appeared to have no relation. ‘What an important influence,” says Sir John Herschel, “may be exercised over the progress of a single branch of science, by the invention of a ready and convenient mode of executing a definite measurement, and the construction and common intro- duction of an instrument adapted for it, cannot be better exem- plified than by the instance of the reflecting goniometer ; this simple, cheap, and portable little instrument has changed the whole face of Mineralogy, and given it all the characters of one of the exact sciences.” Of all the instruments which have been yet applied to scien- tific research, there is perhaps not one which has undergone such important improvements within so brief a space of time, as the Microscope has received during the second quarter of the present century; and there is certainly none whose use under its im- proved form has been more largely or more rapidly productive of most valuable results. As an optical instrument, the Microscope is now at least as perfect as the Telescope; for the 6-feet para- bolic speculum of Lord Rosse’s gigantic instrument, is not more completely adapted to the Astronomical survey of the heavenly bodies, than the achromatic combination of lenses so minute that they can scarcely be themselves discerned by the unaided eye, is to the scrutiny of the Physiologist into the mysteries of life 36 INTRODUCTION. and organization. Nor are the revelations of the one less sur- prising to those who find their greatest charm in novelty, or less interesting to those who apply themselves to the study of their scientific bearings, than are those of the other. The universe which the Microscope brings under our ken, seems as unbounded in its limit as that whose remotest depths the Telescope still vainly attempts to fathom. Wonders as great are disclosed in a speck of whose minuteness the mind can scarcely form any dis- tinct conception, as in the most mysterious of those nebule whose incalculable distance baffles our hopes of attaining a more inti- mate knowledge of their constitution. And the general doctrines to which the labors of Microscopists are manifestly tending, in regard to the laws of Organization and the nature of Vital Action, seem fully deserving to take rank in comprehensiveness and im- portance with the highest principles yet attained in Physical or Chemical Science. As the primary object of this treatise is to promote the use of the Microscope, by explaining its construction, by instructing the learner in the best methods of employing it, and by pointing out the principal directions in which these may be turned to good account, any detailed review of its A¢story would be mis- placed. It will suffice to state, that whilst the s¢mple microscope or magnifying-glass was known at a very remote period, the compound microscope,—the powers of which, like those of the telescope, depend upon the combination of two or more lenses,— was not invented until about the end of the sixteenth century ; the earlier microscopes having been little else than modified tele- scopes, and the essential distinction between the two not having been at first appreciated. Still, even in the very imperfect form which the instrument originally possessed, the attention of scien- tific men was early attracted to the Microscope; for it opened to them a field of research altogether new, and promised to add largely to their information concerning the structure of every kind of organized body. The Transactions of the Royal Society contain the most striking evidence of the interest taken in mi- croscopic investigations two centuries ago. Their early volumes, as Mr. Quekett truly remarks, “literally teem” with improve- ments in the construction of the Microscope, and with discoveries made by its means. The Micrographia of Robert Hooke, pub- lished in 1667, was, for its time, a most wonderful production ; but this was soon surpassed by the researches of Leeuwenhoek, whose name first appears in the Philosophical Transactions, in the year 1678. That with such imperfect instruments at his command, this accurate and pains-taking observer should have seen se much and so well, as to make it dangerous for any one even now to announce a discovery, without having first con- sulted his works, in order to see whether some anticipation of it may not be found there, must ever remain a marvel to the micro- scopist. This is partly to be explained by the fact, that he EARLY REVELATIONS OF THE MICROSCOPE. 37 trusted less to the compound microscope, than to single lenses of high power, the use of which is attended with difficulty, but which are comparatively free from the errors inseparable from the first-named instrument in its original form. The names of Grew and Malpighi, also, appear as frequent contributors to the early volumes of the Philosophical Transactions; the researches of the former having been chiefly directed to the minute struc- ture of Plants, and those of the latter to that of Animals. Both were attended with great success. The former laid the founda- tion of our anatomical knowledge of the Vegetable tissues, and described their disposition in the roots and stems of a great variety of plants and trees; besides making out many important facts in regard to their physiological actions. The latter did the same for the Animal body; and seems to have been the first to witness the marvellous spectacle of the movement of Blood in the capillary vessels of the Frog’s foot,—thus verifying by ocular demonstration that doctrine of the passage of blood from the smallest arteries to the smallest veins, which had been pro- pounded as a rational probability by the sagacious Harvey. Glimpses of the invisible world of Animalcular life were oc- casionally revealed to the earlier Microscopists, by which their curiosity must have been strongly excited; yet they do not ap- pear to have entered on this class of investigations, with any large portion of that persevering zeal which they devoted to the analysis of the higher forms of organic structure. Its won- ders, however, were gradually unfolded; so that in the various treatises on the Microscope published during the eighteenth century, an account of the plants and animals (but especially ot the latter) too minute to be seen by the unaided eye, occupies a conspicuous place. It was towards the middle of that period, that M. Trembley of Geneva first gave to the world his researches on the “Fresh-water Polype”’ or Hydra; the publication of which may be considered to have marked a most important epoch in the history of microscopic inquiry. For it presented to the natu- ralist the first known example of a class of animals (of which the more delicate and flexible Zoophytes are, so to speak, the ske- letons) whose claim to that designation had been previously doubted or even denied, the terms ‘‘sea-mosses,”’ “ sea ferns,” &c., having been applied to them, not merely as appropriately indicat- ing their form and aspect, but as expressive of what even the most eminent Zoologists, as well as Botanists, considered to be their vegetable nature. ‘And it presented to the Physiologist an en- tirely new type of animal life; the wonderful nature of which was fitted not only to excite the liveliest interest, but also to effect a vast extension in the range of the ideas entertained up to that time regarding its nature and capacities. For what animal previously known, could propagate itself by buds like a plant,— could produce afresh any part that might be cut away,—could form any number of new heads by the completion of the halves 38 INTRODUCTION. into which the previous heads had been slit (thus realizing the ancient fable of the Hydra),—could even regenerate the whole from a minute portion, so that when the body of one individual was positively minced into fragments, each of these should grow into a new and complete polype,—could endure being turned inside out, so that what was previously the external surface should become the lining of the stomach, and vice versé,—and could sustain various other kinds of treatment not less strange (such as the grafting of two individuals together, head to head, or tail to tail, or the head of the one to the tail of another), not only without any apparent injury, but with every indication, in the vigor of its life, of being entirely free from suffering or damage? (See Chap. XI).—It was by our own countryman, Ellis, that the discoveries of Trembley were first applied to the elucida- tion of the real animal nature of the so-called Corallines ;? the structure of which was so carefully investigated by him, that subsequent observers added little to our knowledge of it, until a comparatively recent period. The true animaleules were first systematically studied, in the latter part of the last century, by Gleichen, a German micro- scopist, who devised the ingenious plan of feeding them with particles of coloring matter, so as to make apparent the form and position of their digestive cavities; and this study was after- wards zealously pursued by the eminent Danish naturalist, Otho Fred. Miller, to the results of whose labors in this field but little was added by others, until Professor Ehrenberg entered upon the investigation with the advantage of greatly improved instruments. It was at about the same period with Miiller, that Vaucher, a Genevese botanist, systematically applied the Microscope to the investigation of the lower forms of Vegetable life; and made many curious discoveries in regard both to their structure and to the history of their lives. He was the first to notice the ex- traordinary phenomenon of the spontaneous movement of the Zoospores of the humbler aquatic plants, which is known to be the means provided by nature for the dispersion of the race (Chaps. VI, VII); but being possessed with the idea (common to all Natu- ralists of that period and still very generally prevalent) that spon- taneous motion evinces Animal life, he interpreted the facts which he observed, as indicating the existence of a class of beings which are Plants at one phase of their lives, and animals at another,— a doctrine which has since been completely set aside by the ad- vance of physiological knowledge. Notwithstanding this and other errors of interpretation, however, the work of Vaucher on the “‘ Fresh-water Conferve’’ contains such a vast body of accu- rate observation on the growth and reproduction of the Micro- scopic Plants to the study of which he devoted himself, that it is quite worthy to take rank with that of Trembley, as havin g laid ' The structures to which this term is now scientifically restricted, are really vege- table. SUPPOSED FALLACIES OF THE MICROSCOPE. 39 the foundation of all our scientific knowledge of these very inte- resting forms. Although the curious phenomenon of “ conju- gation” had been previously observed by Miiller, yet its con- nection with the function of Reproduction had not been even suspected by him; and it was by Vaucher that its real import was first discerned, and that its occurrence (which had been re- garded by Miiller as an isolated phenomenon, peculiar to a single species) was found to be common to a large number of humble aquatic forms of vegetation. But little advance was made upon the discoveries of Vaucher in regard to these, save by addition to the number of their specific forms, until a fresh stimulus had been given to such investigations by the improvement of the instru- ment itself. At present, they are among the most favorite ob- jects of study among a large number of observers, both in this country and on the Continent ; and are well deserving of the attention which they receive. Less real progress seems to have been made in Microscopic inquiry, during the first quarter of the present century, than during any similar period since the invention of the instrument. The defects inseparable from its original construction, formed a bar to all discovery beyond certain limits ; and although we are now continually meeting with new wonders, which patient and sagacious observation would have detected at any time and with any of the instruments then in use, yet it is not surprising that the impression should have become general, that almost every- thing which it could accomplish had already been done. The instrument fell under a temporary cloud from another cause ; for having been applied by Anatomists and Physiologists to the determination of the elementary structure of the aninal body, their. results were found to be so discordant, as to give rise to a general suspicion of a want of trustworthiness in the Microscope, and in everything announced upon its authority. Thus both the instrument and its advocates were brought into more or less discredit ; and as they continue to lie under this, in the estima- tion of many, to the present day, it will be desirable to pause here for awhile, to inquire into the sources of that discrepancy, to consider whether it is avoidable, and to inquire how far it should lead to a distrust of Microscopic observations, carefully and saga- ciously made, and accurately recorded. It is a tendency common to all: observers, and not by any means peculiar to Microscopists, to describe what they believe and infer, rather than what they actually witness. The older Micro- scopic observers were especially liable to fall into this error; since the want of definiteness in the images presented to their eyes, left a great deal to be completed by the imagination. And when, as frequently happened, Physiologists began with theorizing on the elementary structure of the body, and allowed them- selves to twist their imperfect observations into accordance with their theories, it was not surprising that their accounts of what 40 INTRODUCTION. they professed to have seen should be extremely discordant. But from the moment that the visual image presented by a well-con- structed Microscope, gave almost as perfect an idea of the object, as we could have obtained from the sight of the object itself, if enlarged to the same size and viewed with the unassisted eye, Microscopic observations admitted of nearly the same certainty as observations of any other class; it being only in a comparatively small number of cases, that a doubt can fairly remain about any question of fact, as to which the Microscope can be expected to inform us.! Another fallacy, common like the last to all observations, but with which the Microscopie observations of former times were perhaps especially chargeable, arises from a want of due atten- tion to the conditions under which the observations are made. Thus one observer described the Human Blood-corpuscles as flattened disks resembling pieces of money, another as slightly concave on each surface, a third as slightly convex, a fourth as highly convex, and a fifth as globular; and the former preva- lence of the last opinion, is marked by the habit which still lingers in popular phraseology, of designating these bodies as “pblood-globules.”” Yet all microscopists are now agreed, that their real form, when examined in freshly drawn blood, is that of circular disks, with slightly concave surfaces; and the diversity in previous statements was simply due to the alteration effected in the shape of these disks, by the action of water or other liquids added for the sake of dilution; the effect of this being to render their surfaces first flat, then slightly convex, then more highly convex, at last changing their form to that of perfect spheres. But microscopical inquiries are not in themselves more liable to fallacies of this description, than are any other kinds of scientific investigation; and it will always be found here, as well as elsewhere, that—good instruments and competent observers being presupposed—the accordance in results will be precisely proportional to the accordance of conditions, that is, to the simi- larity of the objects, the similarity of the treatment to which they may be subjected, and the similarity of the mode in which they may be viewed.? The more completely, therefore, the statements of Microscopic observers are kept free from those fallacies, to which observa- tions of any kind are liable, wherein due care has not been taken 1 One of the most remarkable of the questiones verate at present agitated, is the nature of the markings on the siliceous valves of Diatomacee (Chap. VI); some ob- servers affirming those spots of the surface to be elevations, which others consider to be depressions. ‘The difference is here one of interpretation, rather than of direct odserva- tion ; the nature of the case preventing that kind of view of the object, which could leave no doubt as to the fact; and the conclusion formed being one of inference from a variety of appearances, which will differently impress the minds of different individuals. 2 In objects of the most difficult class, such as the Diatomacee, this last point is one of fundamental importance; very different appearances being presented by the same object, according to the mode in which it is illuminated, and the focal adjustment of the object- glass under which it is examined.—See Chap. VI. MODERN REVELATIONS OF THE MICROSCOPE. 41 to guard against them, the more completely will it be found that an essential agreement exists among them all, in regard to the facts which they record. And although the influence of precon- ceived theories still too greatly modifies, in the minds of some, the descriptions they profess to give of the facts actually presented to their visual sense, yet on the whole it is remarkable to what a unity of doctrine the best Microscopists of all countries are con- verging, in regard to all such subjects of this kind of inquiry, as have been studied by them with adequate care and under simi- lar ‘conditions. Hence it is neither fair to charge upon the Microscopists of the present day the errors of their predecessors ; nor is it just to lay to the account of the instrument, what entirely proceeds from the fault of the observer, in recording, not what he sees in it, but what he fancies he can see. It was at the commencement of the second quarter of the present century, that the principle of Achromatic correction, which had long before been applied to the Telescope, was first brought into efficient operation in the construction of the Microscope; for although its theoretical possibility was well known, insupera- ble difficulties were believed to exist in its practical application. The nature of this most important improvement will be explained in its proper place (Chap. I); and at present it will be sufficient to say, that within eight or ten years from the date of its first introduction, the character of the Microscope had been in effect so completely transformed, that it became an altogether new instrument; and from being considered but little better than a scientific toy, it soon acquired the deserved reputation of being one of the most perfect instruments ever devised by Art for the investigation of Nature. To this reputation it has a still greater claim at the present time; and though it would be ha- zardous to deny the possibility of any further improvement, yet the statements of theorists as to what may be accomplished, are so nearly equalled by what has been effected, that little room for improvement can be considered to remain, unless an entirely new theory shall be devised, which shall create a new set of possibilities. Neither Botanists or Zoologists, Anatomists or Physiologists, were slow to avail themselves of the means of perfecting and. ex- tending their knowledge, thus unexpectedly put into their hands ; and the records of Scientific Societies, and the pages of Scientific Journals, have ever since teemed, like the early Transactions of the Royal Society, with discoveries made by its instrumentality. All really philosophic inquirers soon came to feel, how vastly the use of the improved Microscope must add to their insight into every department of Organic Nature; and numbers forth- with applied themselves diligently to the labor of investigation. Old lines of research, which had been abandoned as unlikely to lead to any satisfactory issue, were taken up again with the con- fident expectation of success, which the result has shown to have. 42 INTRODUCTION. been well grounded; and new paths were soon struck out, each of which, leading into some region previously unexplored, soon cleared the way to others which became alike productive; thus laying open an almost unlimited range of inquiry, which the time that has since elapsed has served rather to extend than to contract, and which the labor that has been devoted to it has rather amplified than exhausted. A slight sketch of what has already been accomplished by the assistance of the Microscope, in the investigation of the phenomena of Life, seems an appro- priate Introduction to the more detailed account of the instru- ment and its uses, which the present Treatise is designed to embrace. The comparative simplicity of the structure of Plants, and the relatively large scale of their elementary parts, had allowed the Vegetable Anatomist, as we have seen, to elucidate some of its most important features, without any better assistance than the earlier Microscopes were capable of supplying. And many of those humbler forms of Cryptogamic vegetation, which only manifest themselves to the unaided eye when by their multiplication they aggregate into large masses, had been made the objects of care- ful study, which had yielded some most important results. Hence there seemed comparatively little to be done by the Microscopist in Botanical research; and it was not immediately perceived what was the direction in which his labors were likely to be most productive. Many valuable memoirs had been published, from time to time, on various points of vegetable structure; the increased precision and greater completeness of which, bore testimony to the importance of the aid which had been atforded by the greater efficiency of the instrument employed in such re- searches. But it was when the attention of Vegetable Physiolo- gists first began to be prominently directed to the history of development, as the most important of all the subjects which pre- sented themselves for investigation, that the greatest impulse was given to Scientific Botany; and its subsequent progress has been largely influenced by that impulse, both in the accelerated rate at which it has advanced, and in the direction which it has taken. Although Robert Brown had previously observed and recorded certain phenomena of great importance, yet it is in the Memoir of Prof. Schleiden, first published in 1887, that this new movement may be considered to have had its real origin; so that, whatever may be the errors with which his statements (whether on that occasion, or subsequently) are chargeable, there cannot be any reasonable question as to the essential service he has rendered to science, in pointing out the way to others, on whose results greater reliance may be placed. It was by Schlei- den that the fundamental truth was first broadly enunciated, that as there are as many among the lowest orders of Plants, in which a single cell constitutes the entire individual, cach living for and by itself alone, so each of the cells, by the aggregation of MICROSCOPIC STUDY OF THE CRYPTOGAMIA. 43 which any individual among the higher Plants consists, has an independent life of its own, besides the “incidental” life which it possesses as a part of the organism at large: and that the doctrine was first proclaimed, that the life-history of the indi- vidual cell is therefore the very first and absolutely indispensable basis, not only for Vegetable Physiology, but (as was even then foreseen by his far-reaching mental vision) for Comparative Physiology in general. The first problem, therefore, which he set himself to investigate, was—how does the cell itself originate ? It is unfortunate that he should have had recourse for its solu- tion, to some of those cases in which the investigation is attended with peculiar difficulty, instead of making more use of the means and opportunities which the “single-celled”’ plants afford; and it is doubtless in great part to this cause, that we are to attribute certain fallacies in his results, of which subsequent researches have furnished the correction. In no department of Botany, has recent Microscopy been more fertile in curious and important results, than in that which relates to the humblest forms of Cryptogamia that abound not only in our seas, rivers, and lakes, but even more in our marshes, pools, and ditches. For, in the first place, these present us with a number of most beautiful and most varied forms, such as on that account alone are objects of great interest to the Micro- scopist; this is especially the case with the curious group (ranked among Animalcules by Prof. Ehrenberg), which, from the bipar- tite form of their cells, has received the designation of Desmidiew. In another group, that of Diatomacee (also still regarded as Ani- malcules, not only by Ehrenberg, but by many other Naturalists), not only are the forms of the plants often very remarkable, but their surfaces exhibit markings of extraordinary beauty and symmetry, which are among the best ‘‘test-objects” that can be employed for the higher powers of the instrument (Chap. IV): moreover, the membrane of each cell being coated externally with a film of silica, which not only takes its form, but receives the impress of its minutest markings, the siliceous skeletons remain unchanged after the death of the plants which formed them, sometimes accumulating to such an amount, as to give rise to deposits of considerable thickness at the bottoms of the lakes or pools which they inhabit; and similar deposits, commonly designated as beds of “ fossil animalcules,” are not unfrequently found at a considerable distance from the surface of the ground, on the site of what must have probably once been a lake or estu- ary, occasionally extending over such an area, and reaching to such a depth, as to constitute no insignificant part of the crust of the globe.—It is not only in these particulars, however, that the foregoing and other humble Plants have special attrac- tions for the Microscopist; for the study of their living actions brings to view many phenomena, which are not only well caleu- lated to excite the interest of those who find their chicf pleasure 44 INTRODUCTION. in the act of observing, but are also of the highest value to the Physiologist, who seeks to determine from the study of them what are the acts wherein Vitality may be said essentially to consist, and what are the fundamental distinctions between Ani- mal and Vegetable life. Thus it is among these plants, that we can best study the history of the multiplication of cells by “binary subdivision,” which seems to be the most general mode of growth and increase throughout the Vegetable kingdom ; and it is in these, again, that the process of sexual generation is pre- sented to us under its simplest aspect, in that curious act of “conjugation” to which reference has already been made (p. 39). But further, nearly all these Plants have at some period or other of their lives, a power of spontaneous movement ; which in many instances so much resembles that of Animalcules, as to seem un- mistakably to indicate their animal nature, more especially as this movement is usually accomplished by the agency of visible cilia: and the determination of the conditions under which it occurs, and of the purposes it is intended to fulfil, is only likely to be accomplished after a far more extensive as well as more minute study of their entire history, than has yet been prose- cuted, save in a small number of instances. It is not a little remarkable, that in several of the cases in which the life-history of these plants has been most completely elucidated, they have been found to present a great variety of forms and aspects at different periods of their existence, and also to possess several different methods of reproduction; and hence it can be very little doubted, that numerous forms which are commonly reputed to be distinct and unrelated species, will prove in the end to be nothing else than successive stages of one and the same type. One of the most curious results attained by Microscopie inquiry of late years, has been the successive transfer of one group of reputed Animalcules after another, from the Animal to the Vege- table side of the line of demarcation between the two kingdoms; and although, as to the precise points across which this line should be drawn, there is not yet a unanimous agreement, yet there is now an increasing accordance as to its general situation, which, even a few years since, was energetically canvassed. Those who are acquainted with the well-known Jolvox (com- monly termed the “ globe-animalcule”’) will be surprised to learn that this, with its allies, constituting the family Volvocinee, is now to be considered as on the Vegetable side of the boundary. (On the subjects of this paragraph, see Chap. VI.) Not only this lowest type of Vegetable existence, but the Cryp- togamie series as a whole, has undergone of late years a very close scrutiny, which has yielded results of the highest impor- tance; many new and curious forms having been brought to light (some of them in situations in which their existence might have been least anticipated), and some of the most obscure por- tions of their history having received an unexpectedly clear eluci- MICROSCOPIC STUDY OF THE CRYPTOGAMIA. 45 dation. Thus the discovery was announced by M. Audouin in 1837, that the disease termed muscardine, which annually carried off large numbers of the silkworms bred in the south of France, really consists in the growth of a fungous vegetation in the interior of their bodies, the further propagation of which may be almost entirely prevented by appropriate means; in the succeeding year, the fact was brought forward by several Microscopists, that yeast also is composed of vegetable cells, which grow and multi- ply during the process of fermentation; and subsequent re- searches have shown that the bodies of almost all animals, not even excepting Man himself, are occasionally infested by Vege- table as well as by animal Parasites, many of them remarkable for their beauty of configuration, and others for the variety of the forms they assume. The various parasites which attack our cultivated plants, again,—such as the “blights” of corn, the po- tato fungus, and the vine fungus,—have received a large measure of attention from Microscopists, and much valuable information has been collected in regard to them. It is still a question, how- ever, which has to be decided upon other than microscopic evi- dence, how far the attacks of these fungi are to be considered as the causes of the diseases to which they stand related, or whether their presence (as is undoubtedly the case in many parallel in- stances) is the effect of the previously unhealthy condition of the plants which they infest; the general evidence appears to the author to incline to the latter view. Of all the additions which our knowledge of the structure and life-history of the higher types of Cryptogamic vegetation has received, since the achromatic microscope has been brought to bear upon them, there is none so remarkable as that which re- lates to their Reproductive function. For the existence in that group of anything at all corresponding to the sexual generation of Flowering Plants, was scarcely admitted by any Botanists; and those few who did affirm it were unable to substantiate their views by any satisfactory proof, and were (as the event has shown) quite wrong as to the grounds on which they based them. Various isolated facts, the true meaning of which was quite un- recognized, had been discovered from time to time,—such as the existence of the moving filaments now termed ‘“antherozoids,” in the “ globules” of the Chara (first demonstrated by Mr. Varley in 1834), and in the “antheridia” of Mosses and Liverworts (as shown by Unger and Meyen in 1887), and the presence of “antheridia” upon what had been always previously considered the embryo- frond of the Ferns (first detected by Nageli in 1844); but of the connection of these with the generative function, no valid evi- dence could be produced, and the sexual reproduction of the Cryptogamia was treated by many Botanists of the greatest eminence, as a doctrine not less chimerical, than the doctrine of the sexuality of Flowering Plants had appeared to be to the opponents of Linneus. It was by the admirable researches 46 INTRODUCTION. of Count Suminski upon the development of the Ferns (1848), that the way was first opened to the right comprehension of the reproductive process in that group; and the doctrine of the fertilizing powers of the “antherozoids,” once established in a single case, was soon proved to apply equally well to many others. Not a year has since elapsed, without the pro- duction of new evidence of the like sexuality in the several groups of the Cryptogamic series; this having been especially furnished by Hofmeister in regard to the higher types, by Thuret and Decaisne as to the marine Algw, and by Tulasne with re- spect to Lichens and Fungi; and the doctrine may now be con- sidered as established beyond the reach of cavil from any but those, who, having early committed themselves dogmatically to the negative opinion, have not the candor to allow due weight to the evidence on the affirmative side. With the study of the Reproduction of these plants, that of the history of their Develop- ment has naturally been connected; and some of the facts already brought to light, especially by the study of certain forms of Fun- gous vegetation, demonstrate the extreme importance of this inquiry in settling the foundations of Classification. For whereas the arrangement of Fungi, as of other Plants, has been based upon the characters furnished by their fructification, these charac- ters have been found by Tulasne to be frequently subject to varia- tions so wide, that one and the same individual shall present two or more kinds of fructification, such as had been previously con- sidered to be peculiar to distinct orders. In this department of study, which has been scarcely at all cultivated by Microscopists of our own country, there is a peculiarly wide field for careful’ and painstaking research, and a sure prospect of an ample har- vest of discovery. (On the subjects of the two preceding para- graphs, see Chap. VII.) Although it has been in Cryptogamic Botany, that the zealous pursuit of Microscopic inquiry has been most conducive to scien- tific progress, yet the attention of Vegetable Anatomists and Physiologists has been also largely and productively directed to the minute structure and life-history of Flowering Plants. For although some of the general features of that structure had been made out by the earlier observers, and successive additions had been made to the knowledge of them, previously to the new era to which reference has so often been made, yet all this knowledge required to be completed and made exact, by a more refined ex- amination of the Elementary Tissues than was before possible; and little was certainly known in regard to those processes of growth, development, and reproduction, in which their activity as living organisms consists. All the researches which have been made upon this point, tend most completely to bear out the general doctrine so clearly set forth by Schleiden, as to the independent vitality of each integral part of the fabric; and among the most curious results of the inquiries which have been MICROSCOPIC STUDY OF FLOWERING PLANTS. 47 prosecuted in this direction, may be mentioned the discovery, that the movement of “rotation” of the protoplasma (or the viscid granular fluid at the expense of which the nutritive act seems to take place) within the cells, which was first observed by the Abbé Corti in the Chara in 1776, is by no means a unique or exceptional case; for that it may be detected in so large a num- ber of instances, among Phanerogamia no less than among Cryp- togamia, as apparently to justify the conclusion that it takes place in Vegetable cells generally, at some period or other of their evolution. In studying the phenomena of Vegetable Nu- trition, the Microscope has been most effectually applied, not merely to the determination of changes in the form and arrange- ment of the elementary parts, but also to the detection of such changes in their composition, as ordinary Chemistry would be quite at fault to discover; each individual cell being (so to speak) a laboratory in itself, within which a transformation of organic compounds is continually taking place, not only for its own requirements, but for those of the economy at large; and these changes being at once made apparent by the application of chemical reagents to microscopic specimens whilst actually under observation. Hence the Vegetable Physiologist finds, in this Microscopic Chemistry, one ot his most valuable means of tracing the succession of the changes in which Nutrition consists, as well as of establishing the chemical nature of particles far too minute to be analyzed in the ordinary way; and he derives further assistance in the same kind of investigation, from the application of Polarized Light (§ 68), which immediately enables him to detect the presence of mineral deposits, of starch-granules, and of certain other substances which are peculiarly affected by it. One of the most interesting among the general results of such researches, has been the discovery that the true cell-wall of the Plant (the “ primordial utricle’’ of Mohl) has the same albwmi- nous composition as that of the Animal; the external cellulose envelope, which had been previously considered as the distinc- tive attribute of the Vegetable cell, being in reality but a secre- tion from its surface. Of all the applications of the Microscope, however, to the study of the life-history of the Flowering plant, there is none which has excited so much interest, or given rise to so much discussion, as the nature of the process by which the Ovule is feeundated by the penetration of the pollen-tube. This question, in the opinion of the author, may be considered as now determined ; and the conclusion arrived at is one so strictly in harmony with the general results obtained by the study of the (apparently) very different phenomena presented by the Genera- tive process of the Cryptogamia, that it justifies the Physiologist in advancing a general doctrine as to the nature of the function, which proves to be no less applicable to the Animal kingdom than it is to the Vegetable. (See Chap. VIII.) Among the objects of interest so abundantly offered by the 48 INTRODUCTION. Animal Kingdom to the observation of Microscopists furnished with vastly improved instruments of research, it was natural that those minuter forms of Animal life which teem in almost every stationary collection of water, should engage their early atten- tion; and among those Naturalists who applied themselves to this study, the foremost rank must undoubtedly be assigned to the celebrated German Microscopist, Prof. Ehrenberg. For al- though it is now unquestionable that he has committed numer- ous errors,—many doctrines which at first gained considerable currency on the strength of his high reputation, having now been abandoned by almost every one save their originator,—yet when we look at the vast advances which he unquestionably made in our knowledge of Animalcular life, the untiring industry which he has displayed in the study of it, the impulse which he has given to the investigations of others, and the broad foundation which he has laid for their inquiries in the magnificent works in which his own observations are recorded, we cannot but feel that his services have been almost invaluable, since, but for him, this department of microscopic inquiry would certainly have been in a position far behind that to which it has now advanced. Yet, great as has been the labor bestowed by him and by his followers in the same line of pursuit, it has become increasingly evident of late years that our knowledge of Infusory Animalcules is still in its infancy; that the great fabric erected by Prof. Ehrenberg rests upon a most insecure foundation; and that the Anatomy, Physiology, and systematic arrangement of these beings need to be restudied completely, ab initio. For, in the first place, there can be no doubt whatever, that a considerable section of the so- called Animalcules belongs to the Vegetable kingdom; consist- ing, as already pointed out, of the motile forms of the humbler Plants, of which a very large proportion pass, at some period of their existence, through a stage of activity that serves for their diffusion. Moreover, in another group, whose character has been entirely misconceived by the great German Microscopist, and was first clearly discriminated by M. Dujardin, there is neither mouth nor stomach of any kind; the minute plants and animals which serve it as food, being incorporated, as it were, with the soft animal jelly, which constitutes the almost homogeneous body; and this jelly further extending itself into “ pseudopodial” prolongations, whereby these alimentary particles are laid hold of and drawn in. It was by the same distinguished French Mi- eroscopist, that the important fact was first discovered, that animals of this Rhizopod type are really the fabricators of those minute shells, which, from their Nautilus-like aspect, had been previously regarded as belonging to the highest class of the Mol- luscous Sub-Kingdom; and the whole of this most interesting group, which had received from M. D’Orbigny (who first per- ceived the speciality of its nature, and made a particular study of it) the designation of Foraminifera, has thus had its place in MICROSCOPIC STUDY OF ANIMALCULES. 49 the Animal scale most strangely reversed; being at once de- graded from a’ position but little removed from Vertebrated ani- mals, to a level in some respects even lower than that of the ordinary Animalcules. But even when Prof. Ehrenberg’s class of Polygastrica has been thus reduced, by the removal of those forms which are true Plants, and by the detachment of such as belong to the Rhizopod group, we find that our knowledge of its real nature is almost wholly to be gained; since little else has yet been accomplished than a description of a multitude of forms, of whose history as living beings scarcely anything else is known, than that they take food into the interior of their bodies by means of an oral orifice, that they digest this food and appropriate it to their own growth, and that they multiply themselves by binary subdivision. Now there is a very strong analogical probability, that many even of the most dissimilar forms of these Animalcules will prove to be different states of one and the same; for their multiplication by binary subdivision being nota true generative process, but being merely (so to speak) the growth of the individual, we may be al- most certain that sooner or later a new phase will present itself, consisting in the evolution of proper sexual bodies, which will perform a true generative act, the products of which may be very probably quite different from the forms we are accustomed to regard as peculiar to each species. The attention of several eminent Microscopists at the present time is strongly fixed upon this part of the inquiry ; which can only be efficiently prosecuted, by limiting the range of observation for a time to @ small number of forms, and pursuing these through all the phases of their ex- istence. Among the most important of Prof. Ehrenberg’s unquestioned discoveries, we are undoubtedly to place that of the compara- tively high organization of the Rotifera, or Wheel-Animalcules and their allies ; for which, though previously confounded with a similar Infusoria, he asserted and vindicated a claim to a far more elevated rank. Yor although in this instance, too, some of his descriptions have been shown to be incorrect, and many of his inferences to be erroneous, and although subsequent observ- ers are not agreed among themselves as to many important par- ticulars, yet all assent to the general accuracy of Prof. Ehrenberg’s statements, and recognize the title of the Rotifera to a place not far removed from that of the Vermiform tribes. A parallel dis- covery was made about the same time by MM. Audouin and Milne Edwards, in regard to the Flustre and their allies, which had previously ranked among those flexible Zoophytes popularly known as “ corallines,” andare often scarcely to be distinguished from them in mode of growth or general aspect ;’ but which ' “You go down,” says Mr. Kingsley, “to any shore after a gale of wind, and pick up a few delicate little sea-ferns. You have two in your hand (Sertularia operculata and Gemellaria loriculata), which probably look to you, eyen under a good pocket mag- nifier, identical or nearly so. But you are told, to your surprise, that however like the 50 INTRODUCTION. were separated as a distinct order by these observers, on account of their possession of a second orifice to the alimentary canal, and the general tendency of their plan of organization to that which characterizes the inferior Mollusca. The importance of this distinction was at once recognized ; and the group received the designation of Polyzoa from Mr. J. V. Thompson, and of Bryozoa from Prof. Ehrenberg. The organization of this very interesting group was further elucidated, some years subsequent- ly, by the admirable observations of Dr. Arthur Farre upon a newly-discovered form (named by him Bowerbankia), the trans- parence of whose envelopes allowed its internal structure to be distinctly made out ; and the additional features which he de- tected, were all such asto strengthen the idea already entertained of its essentially Molluscan character. This ideareceived its final and complete confirmation from the admirable researches of M. Milne Edwards on the Compound Ascidians, which are the lowest animals whose Molluscous nature had been previously ac- knowledged ; these having been discovered by him to agree with Zoophytes in their plant-like attribute of extension by “ gemma- tion” or budding, and to present, in all the most important fea- tures of their organization, an extremely close approximation to the Bryozoa. Thus whilst Microscopic research has degraded the Foraminifera from their supposed rank with the Nautilus and Cuttle-fish, to the level of the Sponge, it has raised the Wheel-Animalcules into proximity with the aquatic Worms, and the humble “ Sea-Mat,” formerly supposed to be a Plant, to a position not much below that of the Oyster and Mussel.' Another most curious and most important field of microscopic inquiry has been opened up in the discovery of the Transforma- tions which a large proportion of the lower animals undergo, during the early stages of their existence ; and notwithstanding that it has even yet been very imperfectly cultivated, the unexpect- ed result has been already attained, that the fact of “metamor- phosis,”—previously known only in the cases of Insects and Tad- poles, and commonly considered as an altogether exceptional phe- nomenon,—is almost wnzversal among the inferior tribes ; it being a rare occurrence for the offspring to come forth from the egg in a condition bearing any resemblance to that which characterizes the adult, and the latter being in general attained only after a long series of changes, in the course of which many curious phases are presented. One of the earliest and most remarkable discoveries which was made in this direction,—that of the meta- morphosis of the Cirrhipeds (Barnacles and their allies) by Mr. J. V. Thompson,—proved of most important assistance in the de- termination of the true place of that group, which had previously been a matter of controversy; for although in their outward dead horny polypidoms which you hold may be, the two species of animal which have formed them, are at least as far apart in the scale of creation as a quadruped is from a fish.” sn reference to the subjects of the three preceding paragraphs, see Chaps. IX I y ? MICROSCOPIC STUDY OF LOWER ANIMALS. 51 characters they bear such a resemblance to Mollusks, that the Barnacles which attach themselves to floating timber, and the Acorn-shells which incrust the surfaces of rocks, are unhesitat- ingly ranked by Shell-collectors among their “ multivalves,” yet the close resemblance which exists between their early forms and the little Water-Fleas which swarm in our pools, makes it quite certain that the Barnacles not only belong to the Articulated in- stead of tothe Molluscous series, but that they must be ranked in close proximity to the Entomostracous division of the Crustacea, if not actually asmembers of it. To the same discoverer, moreover, we owe the knowledge that even the common Crab undergoes metamorphoses scarcely less strange, its earliest form being a lit- tle creature of most grotesque shape, which had been previously described as an adult and perfect Entomostracan; so that, al- though scarcely any two creatures can apparently be more uhlike than a Barnacle and a Crab, they have (so to speak) the same starting-point; the difference in their ultimate aspect chiefly arising from the difference in the proportionate development of parts which are common to both. A still more remarkable series of Metamorphoses has recently been shown by Prof. Miiller to exist among the Echinoderms (Star-fish, Sea-urchings, &c.) ; whose development he has studied with great perseverance and sagacity. Thus the larva of the Star-fish is an active free-swimming animal, having a long body with six slender arms on each side, from one end of which the young star-fish is (so to speak) budded off; and when this has attained a certain stage of development, the long twelve-armed body separates from it and dies off, its chief func- tion having apparently been, to carry the young Star-fish to a distance from its fellows, and thus to prevent overcrowding by the accumulation of individuals in particular spots, which would be liable to occur if they never had any more active powers of locomotion than they possess in their adult state. Scarcely less remarkable are the changes which are to be witnessed in the greater number of aquatic Mollusks, almost all of which, however inert in their adult condition, possess active powers of locomotion in their larval state ; some being propelled by the vibratile move- ment of cilia disposed upon the head somewhat after the fashion of those of Wheel-animalcules, and others by the lateral strokes of a sort of tail which afterwards disappears like that of a tadpole. Among the Annelids or marine worms, again, there is found to be an extraordinary dissimilarity, though of a somewhat dif- ferent nature, between the larval and the adult forms: for they commonly come forth from the egg in a condition but little ad- vanced beyond that of Animalcules; and, although they do not undergo any metamorphosis comparable to that of Insects, they pass through a long series of phases of development (chiefly consisting in the successive production of new joints or segments, and of the organs appertaining to these) before they acquire their complete type. In nearly all the foregoing cases it may be re- 52 INTRODUCTION. marked, that the larval forms of different species bear to one another a far stronger resemblance than exists among adults, the distinguishing characters of the latter being only evolved in the course of their development; and every new discovery in this direction only gives fresh confirmation to the great law of development early detected by the sagacity of Von Baer, that the more special forms of structure arise out of the more general, and this by a gradual change. The meaning of this law will become ob- vious hereafter, when some of the principal cases to which it applies shall have been brought in illustration of it (Chap. XII). A still more curious series of discoveries has been made, by means of the Microscope, in regard to the early development of the Mcdusan Acalephs (jelly-fish, &c.), and the relationship that exists between them and the Hydraform Zoophytes ;—two groups of animals, which had been previously ranked in different classes, and had not been supposed to possess anything in common. For it has been clearly made out by the careful observations of Sars, Siebold, Dalyell, and others, that those delicate arborescent Zoophytes, each polype of which is essentially a Hydra, not only grow by extending themselves into new branches, like plants, sometimes also budding off detached gemme, which multiply their kind by developing themselves into Zoophytic forms like those whence they sprang; but also produce peculiar buds hav- ing all the characters of Medusce, which contain the proper gene- rative organs of the Zoophyte, but which, usually detaching themselves from the stock that bore them, swim freely through the ocean as minute jelly-fish, without exhibiting the slightest trace of their originally attached condition. The Meduse in due time produce fertile eggs; and each egg developes itself, not into the form of its immediate progenitor, ‘but into that of the Zoo- phyte from which the Medusa was budded off. And thus a most extraordinary alteration of forms is presented, between the Zoo- phyte, which may be compared to the growing or vegetating stage of a Plant (its polypes representing the leaf-buds), and the Medusa, the development of which marks its flowering stage. So again, from the investigation of the early history of those larger forms of “jelly-fish’’ with which every visitor to the sea- coast is familiar, it has been rendered certain that they too are developed from Polype larvee, usually of very minute size, which give off Medusa buds; so that whilst they are best known to us in their Medusan state, and the Hydraform Zoophytes in their polypoid state, each of these groups is the representative of a certain stage in the life-history of one and the same tribe of these curious beings, which, when complete, includes both states, as will hereafter be shown in more detail (Chap. XI). Changes very similar in kind, and in many respects even more remark- able, have been found by microscopic inquiry to take place among the Hntozoa (intestinal worms); but being interesting only to professed Naturalists and scientific Physiologists, they scarcely call for particular notice in a treatise like the present. MICROSCOPIC STUDY OF LOWER ANIMALS, 53 It has not been among the least important results of the new turn which Zoological inquiry has thus taken, that a far higher spirit has been introduced into the cultivation of this science, than previously pervaded it. Formerly it was thought, both in Zoology and in Botany, that Classification might be adequately based on external characters alone; and the scientific acquire- ments of a Naturalist were estimated rather by the extent of his acquaintance with these, than by any knowledge he might possess of their internal organization. The great system of Cuvier, it is true, professed to rest upon organization as its basis; but the acquaintance with this which was considered requisite for the purpose, was very limited in its amount and superficial in its character; and no Naturalist formerly thought of studying the history of Development as a necessary adjunct to the Science of Classification. How essential a knowledge of it has now become, however, if only as a basis for any truly natural arrangement of Animals, must have become apparent from the preceding sketch; and it has thus come to be felt and admitted amongst all truly philosophic Naturalists, that the com- plete study of any particular group, even for the purposes of classification, involves the acquirement of a knowledge, not only of its intimate structure, but of its entire life-history. And thus Natural History and Physiology,—two departments of the great Science of Life, which the Creator inextricably blended, but which Man has foolishly striven to separate,—are now again being brought into their original and essential harmony; and it is coming to be thought more credible, to give a complete eluci- dation of the history of even a single species, than to describe any number of new forms, about which nothing else is made out save what shows itself on the surface. Thus every Microscopist, however limited may be his oppor- tunities, has a wide range of observation presented to him in the study of the lower forms of Animal life; with the strongest incite- ment to persevering and well-directed inquiry, that the anticipation of novelty, and the expectation of valuable results, can afford. For, notwithstanding the large number of admirable records which have been already publighed (chiefly, we must admit with regret, by Continental Naturalists) upon the developmental history of the lower tribes of Animals, there is no one of the subjects that have been just passed in review, of which the knowledge hith- erto gained can be regarded as more than a sample of that which remains to be acquired. Records like those already referred to, might easily be multiplied a hundred fold, with infinite advan- tage to Science; if those Microscopists who spend their time in desultory observation, and in looking at some favorite objects over and over again, would but concentrate their attention upon some particular species or group, and work out its entire history with patience and determination. And the observer himself would find this great advantage in so doing,—that an inquiry 54 INTRODUCTION. thus pursued gradually becomes to him an object of such attrac- tive interest, that he experiences a zest in its pursuit to which the mere dilettante is an entire stranger,—besides enjoying all the mental profit, which is the almost necessary result of the thorough performance of any task that is not in itself unworthy. And what can be a more worthy occupation, than the attempt to gain an insight, however limited, into the operations of Creative Wisdom ?—these being not less wonderfully displayed among the forms of Animal life which are accounted the simplest and least attractive, than in those which more conspicuously solicit the attention of the Student of Nature, by the beauty of their aspect or the elaborateness of their organization. It has not been, however, in the study of the minuter forms of Animal life alone, that the Microscope has been turned to valu- able account; for the Anatomists and Physiologists who had made the Human fabric the especial object of their study, and who had been led to believe that the knowledge accumulated by their repeated and persevering scrutiny into every portion accessible to their vision, was all which it lay within their power to attain, have found in this new instrument of research, the means of advancing far nearer towards the penetralia of Organ- ization, and of gaining a much deeper insight into the mysteries of Life, than had ever before been conceived possible. For every part of the entire organism has been, so to speak, decom- posed into its elementarg tissues, the structure and actions of each of which have been separately and minutely investigated; and thus a new department of study, which is known as Histology (or Science of the Tissues), has not only been marked out, but has already made great advances towards completeness. In the pursuit of this inquiry, the Microscopists of our day have not limited themselves to the fabric of Man, but have extended their researches through the entire range of the Animal kingdom; and in so doing, have found, as in every other department of Nature, a combination of endless variety in detail, with a mar- vellous simplicity and uniformity of general plan. Thus the bones which constitute the skeleton of the Vertebrated animal,— however different from each other in their external configura- tion, in the arrangement of their compatt and their cancellated portions, and other such particulars as specially adapt them for the purposes they have to perform in each organism,—all consist of a certain kind of tissue, distinguished under the microscope by features of a most peculiar and interesting kind; and these features, whilst presenting (like those of the Human counte- nance) a certain general conformity to a common plan, exhibit (as Prof. Quekett has shown) such distinctive modifications of that plan in the different classes and orders of the Vertebrated series, that it is generally possible by the microscopic examina- tion of the merest fragment of a bone, to pronounce with great probability as to the natural family to which it has belonged. “Still MICROSCOPIC STUDY OF ANIMAL TISSUES. 55 more is this the case in regard to the Teeth, whose organic struc- ture (originally detected by Leeuwenhoek) has been newly and far more completely elucidated by Profrs. Purkinje, Retzius, Owen, and Tomes; for the inquiry into the comparative struc- ture of these organs, which has been prosecuted™by Prof. Owen, in particular, through the entire range of the Vertebrated series, has shown that, with an equally close conformity to a certain general plan of structure, there are at the same time still wider diversities in detail, which are so characteristic of their respective groups, that it is often possible to discriminate, not only families, but even the genera and species, by careful attention to the minute features of their structure. Similar inquiries, with results in many respects analogous, have been carried out by the Author, in regard to the Shells of Mollusks, Crustaceans, and . Echinoderms; his researches having not only demonstrated the regularly-organized structure of these protective envelopes (which had been previously affirmed to be mere inorganic exudations, presenting in many instances a crystalline texture), but having shown that many natural groups are so distinctively character- ized by the microscopic peculiarities they present, that the in- spection of a minute fragment of Shell will often serve to deter- mine, no less surely than in the case of bones and teeth, the position of the animal of which it formed a part. The soft parts of the Animal body, moreover, such as the cartilages which cover the extremities of the bones and the ligaments which hold them together at the joints, the muscles whose contraction deve- lopes motion and the tendons which communicate that motion, the nervous ganglia which generate nervous force and the nerve- fibres which convey it, the skin which clothes the body and the mucous and serous membranes which line its cavities, the asstm7- lating glands which make the blood and the secreting glands which keep it in a state of purity,—these, and many other tissues that might be enumerated, are severally found to present character- istic peculiarities of structure, which are more or less distinctly recognizable throughout the Animal series, and which bear the strongest testimony to the Unity of the Design in which they all originated. As we descend to the lower forms of Animal life, however, we find these distinctions less and less obvious; and we at last come to fabrics of such extreme simplicity and homogene- ousness, that every part seems to resemble every other in struc- ture and action; no provision being made for that “ division of labor” which marks the higher types of organization, and which, being the consequence of the development of separate organs each having its special work to do, can only be effected where there is a “differentiation” of parts, that gives to the entire fabric a character of heterogeneousness. The Microscopic investigation whose nature has thus been sketched, has not only been most fruitful in the discovery of individual facts, but has led to certain general results, of great 56 INTRODUCTION. value in Physiological Science. Among the most important of these, is the complete metamorphosis which has been effected in the ideas previously entertained regarding living action ; such having been essentially based on the Circulation of the blood, as the only vital fhenomenon of which any direct cognizance could be gained through the medium of the senses. For it gradually came to be clearly perceived, that in the Animal as in the Plant, each integral portion of the Organism possesses an independent Life of its own, in virtue of which it performs a series of actions pe- culiar to itself, provided that the conditions requisite for those actions be supplied to it; and that the Life of the body as a whole (like a symphony performed by a full orchestra) consists in the harmonious combination of its separate instrumental acts, —the circulation of the blood, instead of making the tissues, sim- ply affording the supply of prepared nutriment, at the expense of which they evolve themselves from germs previously existing. This general doctrine was first put prominently forwards by Schwann, whose “ Microscopical Researches into the Accordance in the Structure and Growth of Animals and Plants,” published in 1839, marks the commencement of a new era in all that department of Animal Physiology, which comprises the simply vegetative life of the organized fabric. These researches, avow- edly based upon the ideas advanced by Schleiden, were prose- cuted in the same direction as his had been; the object which this admirable observer and philosophic reasoner specially pro- posed to himself, being the study of the development of the ‘Animal tissues. He found that although their evolution cannot be watched while in actual progress, its history may be traced out by the comparison of the successive stages brought to light ‘by Microscopic research; and in so far as this has been accom- plished for each separate part of the organism, the structure and actions of its several components, however diverse in their fully developed condition, are found to resemble each other more and more closely, the more nearly these parts are traced back to their earliest appearance. Thus we arrive in our retrospective survey, at a period in the early history of Man, at which the whole em- bryonic mass is but a congeries of cells, all apparently similar and equal to each other; and going still further back, it is found that all these have had their origin in the subdivision of a single primordial cell, which is the first defined product of the generative act. On this single cell, the Physiologist bases his idea of the most elementary type of Organization ; whilst his actions present him with all that 1s essential to the notion of Life. And in pur- suing the history of the germ, from this, its simplest and most homogeneous form, to the assumption of that completed and per- fected type which is marked by the extreme heterogeneousness of its different parts, he has another illustration of that law of pro- gress from the general to the special, which is one of the highest principles yet attained in the science of Vitality... MICROSCOPIC STUDY OF ANIMAL DEVELOPMENT. 57 But, further, the Physiologist, not confining his inquiries to Man, pursues the like researches into the developmental history of other living beings, and is soon led to the conclusion that the same is true of them also; each Animal, as well as each Plant, having the same starting-point in the single cell; and the dis- tinctive features by which its perfected form is characterized, how striking and important soever these may be, arising in the course of its development towards the condition it is ultimately to present. In the progress of that evolution, those fundamental differences which mark out the great natural divisions of the Animal and the Vegetable kingdoms respectively, are the first to manifest themselves; and the subordinate peculiarities which distinguish classes, orders, families, genera, and species, succes- sively make their appearance, usually (but not by any means constantly) in the order of importance which Systematists have assigned to them. And it is in thus pursuing, by the aid which the Microscope alone can afford to his visual power, the history of the Organic Germ, from that simple and homogeneous form which seems common to every kind of living being, either ‘to that complex and most heterogeneous organism which is the mortal tenement of Man’s immortal spirit, or only to that hum- ble Protophyte or Protozoon, which lives and grows and multi- plies witlout showing any essential advance upon its embryonic type,—that the Physiologist is led to his grandest conception of the Unity and All-Comprehensive nature of that Creative Design, of which the development of every individual Organism, from the lowest to the highest, is a separate exemplification, at once perfect in itself, and harmonious with every other. It has been the purpose of the foregoing sketch, to convey an! idea, not merely of the services which the Microscope has already rendered to the collector of facts in every department of the Sci- ence of Life, but also of the value of these facts as a foundation for philosophical reasoning. For it is when thus utilized, that. observations, whether made with the Microscope or with the Telescope, or by any other instrumentality, acquire their highest value, and excite the strongest interest in the mind. But as it is not every one who is prepared by his previous acquirements to appreciate such researches, according to the scientific estimate of their importance, it may be well now to address ourselves to that large and increasing number, who are disposed to apply themselves to Microscopic research as amateurs, following the pursuit rather as a means of wholesome recreation to their own minds, than with a view to the extension of the boundaries of existing knowledge; and to those in particular who are charged, whether as parents or as instructors, with the direction and train- ing of the youthful mind. All the advantages which have been urged at various times, 58 INTRODUCTION. with so much sense and vigor,! in favor of the study of Natural History, apply with full force to Microscopical inquiry. What better encouragement and direction can possibly be given to the exercise of the observing powers of a child, than to habituate him to the employment of this instrument upon the objects which immediately surround him, and then to teach him to search out novelties among those less immediately accessible? The more we limit the natural exercise of these powers, by the use of those methods of education which are generally considered to be spe- cially advantageous for the development of the Intellect,—the more we take him from fields and woods, from hills and moors, from river-side and sea-shore, and shut him up in close school- rooms and narrow play-grounds, limiting his attention to ab- stractions, and cutting him off even in his hours of sport from those sights and sounds of Nature which seem to be the ap- pointed food of the youthful spirit,—the more does it seem im- portant that he should in some way be brought into contact with her, that he should have his thoughts sometimes turned from the pages of books to those of Creation, from the teachings of Man to those of God. Now if we attempt to give this direction to the thoughts and feelings in a merely dédactie mode, it loses that spontaneousness which is one of its most valuable features. But if we place before the young a set of objects which cam scarcely fail to excite their healthful curiosity, satisfying this only so far as to leave them still inquirers, and stimulating their interest from time to time by the disclosure of such new wonders as arouse new feelings of delight, they come to look upon the pur- suit as an ever-fresh fountain of happiness and enjoyment, and to seek every opportunity of following it for themselves. There are no circumstances or conditions of life, which need be altogether cut off from these sources of interest and improve- ment. Those who are brought up amidst the wholesome influ- ences of a country life, have, it is true, the greatest direct oppor- tunities of thus drawing from the Natural Creation the appropriate nurture for their own spiritual life. But the very familiarity of the objects around them, prevents these from exerting their most wholesome influence, unless they be led to see how much there is beneath the surface even of what they seem to know best; and in rightly training them to look for this, how many educational objects,—physical, intellectual, and moral,—may be answered at the same time! ‘A walk without an object,” says Mr. Kings- ley, “unless in the most lovely and novel scenery, is a poor exercise; and as a recreation utterly nil. If we wish rural walks to do our children any good, we must give them a love for rural sights, an object in every walk; we must teach them—and we can teach them—to find wonder in every insect, sublimity in every hedge-row, the records of past worlds in every pebble, and ' By none more forcibly than by Mr. Kingsley, in his recent little volume entitled “ Glaucus, or the Wonders of the Shore.” EDUCATIONAL VALUE OF THE MICROSCOPE. 59 boundless fertility upon the barren shore; and so, by teaching them to make full use of that limited sphere in which they now are, make them faithful in a few things, that they may be fit hereafter to be rulers over much.” What can be a more effectual). means of turning such opportunities to the best account, than the employment of an aid which not only multiplies almost infinitely the sources of interest presented by the objects with which our eye® are most familiar, but finds inexhaustible life where all seems lifeless, ceaseless activity where all seems motion- less, perpetual change where all seems inert? Turn, on the other hand, to the young who are growing up in our great towns, in the heart of the vast Metropolis, whose range of vision is limited on every side by bricks and mortar, who rarely see a green leaf or a fresh blade of grass, and whose knowledge of animal life is practically limited to the dozen or two of creatures that every- where attach themselves to the companionship of Man, and shape their habits by his. To attempt to inspire a real love of Nature by books and pictures, in those who have never felt her influences, is almost hopeless. A child may be interested by accounts of her wonders, as by any other instructive narrative; but they have little of life or reality in his mind,—far less than has the story of adventure which appeals to his own sympathies, or even than the fairy tale which charms and fixes his imagination. But here the , Microscope may be introduced with all the more advantage, as being almost the only means accessible under such circumstances, for supplying what is needed. A single rural or even suburban walk will afford stores of pleasurable occupation for weeks, in the examination of its collected treasures. A large glass jar may be easily made to teem with life, in almost as many and as varied forms as could be found by the unaided eye in long and toilsome voyages over the wide ocean; and a never-ending source of amusement is afforded by the observation of their growth, their changes, their movements, their habits. The school-boy thus trained, looks forward to the holiday which shall enable him to search afresh in some favorite pool, or to explore the wonders of some stagnant basin, with as much zest as the keenest sportsman longs for a day’s shooting on the moors, or a day’s fishing in the best trout stream; and with this great advantage over him,— that his excursion is only the beginning of a fresh stock of enjoyment, instead of being in itself the whole. This is no imaginary picture, but one which we have constantly “under our eyes; and no argument can be needed to show the value of such a taste, to such, at least, as have set clearly before their minds the objects at which they should aim in the great work of Education. For we have not merely to train the intel- lectual powers and to develope the moral sense ; but to form those tastes—those “likes and dislikes’’—which exercise a more abiding and amore cogent influence on the conduct, than either the reason or the mere knowledge of duty. It is our object to foster 60 INTRODUCTION, all the higher aspirations, to keep in check all that is low and de- grading. But the mind must have recreation and amusement ; and the more closely it is kept by the system of education adopted, to the exercise of any one set of powers, the more potent will be that reaction which will urge it, when restraint is removed, to activity of some other kind; and the more important is it, that this reaction should receive a direction to what is healthful and elevating, instead of to what is weakening and @egrading. It is quite a mistake to imagine that those evil habits which result from a wrong exercise of the natural powers, a wrong direction of the natural tendencies, can be effectually antagonized by the simple effort at repression. The constant exercise either of ex- ternal coercion or of internal restraint, tends to keep the atten- tion directed towards the forbidden object of gratification ; the malady is only held in check, not cured; and it will break out, perhaps with augmented force, whenever the perpetually-present impulses shall derive more than ordinary strength from some casual occurrence, or the restraining power shall have been tem- porarily weakened. The only ettectual mode of keeping in check the wrong, is by making use of these same powers and tendencies in a right mode ; by finding out objects whereon they may be beneficially exercised; and by giving them such a direc- tion and encouragement, as may lead them to expend themselves upon these, instead of fretting and chafing under restraint, ready. to break loose at the first opportunity. There is no object on which the youthful energy can be employed more worthily, than in the pursuit of Knowledge; no kind of knowledge can be made more attractive, than that which is presented by the Works of Creation; no source is more accessible, no fountain more inexhaustible ; and there is none which affords, both in the mode of pursuing it, and in its own nature, so complete and beneficial a diversion from the ordinary scholastic pursuits. If there be one class more than another, which especially needs to have its attention thus awakened to such objects of interest, as, by drawing its better nature into exercise, shall keep it free from the grovelling sensuality in which it too frequently loses itself, it is our Laboring population; the elevation of which is one of the great social problems of the day. On those who are actively concerned in promoting and conducting its education, the claims and advantages of the Study of Nature can scarcely be too strongly urged; since experience has fully proved,—what might have been a priori anticipated,—that where the taste for this pursuit has been early fostered by judicious training, it be- comes so completely a part of the mind, that it rarely leaves the individual, however unfavorable his circumstances may be to its exercise, but continues to exert a refining and elevating in- fluence through his whole subsequent course of life. Now for the reasons already stated, the Microscope is not merely a most valuable adjunct in such instruction, but its assistance is essential EDUCATIONAL USES OF THE MICROSCOPE. 61 in giving to almost every Natural object its highest educational . value ; and whilst the country Schoolmaster has the best oppor- tunities of turning it to useful account, it is to the ety School- master that, in default of other opportunities, its importance as an educational instrument should be the greatest. It was from feeling very strongly how much advantage would accrue from the introduction of a form of Microscope, which should be at once good enough for Educational purposes, and cheap enough to find its way into every well-supported School in town and coun- try, that the Author suggested to the Society of Arts in the summer of 1854, that it should endeavor to carry out an object so strictly in accordance with the enlightened purposes which it is aiming to effect; and this suggestion having been considered worthy ofadoption, a Committee, chiefly consisting of experienced Microscopists, was appointed to carry it into effect. It was de- termined to aim at obtaining two instruments ;—a simple and low-priced microscope for the use of Scholars, to whom it might be appropriately given as a reward for zeal and proficiency in the pursuit of Natural History, not in books, but in the field ;—and a compound Microscope for the use of Teachers, of capacity sufii- cient to afford a good.view of every kind of object most likely to interest the pupil or to be within the reach of the instructor. Notwithstanding the apprehensions generally expressed, that no instruments at all likely to answer the intended purpose could possibly be produced at the prices specified, the result has proved the fallacy; for among several instruments of greater or less efficiency, sent in competition for the award, the Committee was able to select a Simple and a Compound Microscope fully an-° swering their expectations, and henceforth to be supplied to the public at a cost so low as to place these instruments (it may be hoped) within the reach of almost every one to whom they are likely to be of service. An account of these two Microscopes will be given hereafter. (Chap. II, §§ 29, 31.) It is not alone, however, as furnishing an attractive object of pursuit for the young—fitted at once to excite a wholesome taste for novelty, ever growing with what it feeds on, and to call forth the healthful exercise of all those powers, both physical and mental, which can minister to its gratification,—that Natu- ral History studies in general, and Microscopie inquiry in particular, are to be specially commended as a means of intel- lecttal and moral discipline; for there is no capacity, however elevated, to which they do not furnish ample material for the exercise of all its best powers, no period of life which may not draw from them its purest pleasures. Even to observe well is not: so easy a thing as some persons imagine. Some are too hasty, imagining that they can take in everything at a glance, and hence often forming very erroneous or imperfect notions, which may give an entirely wrong direction not only to their own views but to those of others, and may thus render necessary an amount 62 INTRODUCTION. \of labor for the ultimate determination of the truth, many times as great as that which would have sufficed in the first instance, had the original observations been accurately made and faithfully recorded. Others, again, are too slow and hesitating ; and fix their attention too much upon details, to be able to enter into the real significance of what may be presented to the vision. Although ignorance has doubtless much to do in producing both these faults, yet they both have their source in mental tendencies which are not corrected by the mere acquisition of knowledge, and which are very inimical, not merely to its fair reception, but also to the formation of a sound judgment upon any subject whatever. The habit of guarding against them, therefore, once acquired in regard to Microscopic observation, will be of invalu- able service in every walk of life. Not less important is it (as ‘has been already shown), to keep our observations free alike from the bias of preconceived ideas, and from the suggestive influence of superficial resemblances; and here, too, we find the training which Microscopical study affords, especially when it is prosecuted under the direction of an experienced guide, of the highest value in forming judicious habits of thought and action. To set the young observer to examine and investigate for him- self, to tell him merely where to look and (in general terms) what to look for, to require from him a careful account of what he sees, and then to lead him to compare this with the descriptions of similar objects by Microscopists of large experience and un- questionable accuracy, is not only the best training he can receive as a Microscopist, but one of the best means of preparing his mind for the exercise of its powers in any sphere whatever. It cannot be too strongly or too constantly kept in view, that the value of the results of Microscopic inquiry will depend far more upon the sagacity, perseverance, and accuracy of the ob- server, than upon the elaborateness of his instrument. The most perfect Microseope ever made, in the hands of one who knows not how to turn it to account, is valueless; in the hands of a careless, a hasty, or a prejudiced observer, it is worse than value- less, as furnishing new contributions to the already large stock of errors that pass under the guise of scientific truths. On the other hand, the least costly Microscope that has ever been con- ' structed, how limited soever its powers, provided that it gives no false appearances, shall furnish to him who knows what may be done with it, a means of turning to an account, profitable alike to science and to his own immortal spirit, those hours which might otherwise be passed in languid ennu?, or in frivolous or degrading amusements,' and even of immortalizing his name by the discovery of secrets in Nature as yet undreamed of. A very 1 “T have seen,” says Mr. Kingsley, “the cultivated man, craving for travel and suc- cess in life, pent up in the drudgery of London work, and yet keeping his spirit calm, and his morals perhaps all the more righteous, by spending over his Microscope even- ings which would too probably have gradually been wasted at the theatre.” EDUCATIONAL USES OF THE MICROSCOPE. 63 large proportion of the great achievements of Microscopic re- search that have been noticed in the preceding outline, have been made by the instrumentality of microscopes which would be generally condemned in the present days as utterly unfit for any scientific purpose; and it cannot for a moment be supposed, that the field which Nature presents for the prosecution of in- quiries with instruments of comparatively limited capacity, has been in any appreciable degree exhausted. On the contrary,’ what has been done by these ‘and scarcely superior instruments, only shows how much there is to be done. The author may be excused for citing, as an apposite example of his meaning, the curious results he has recently obtained from the study of the development of the Purpura lapillus (rockwhellx), which will be detailed in their appropriate anes (Chap. XII); for these were obtained almost entirely by the aid of single lenses, the Compound Microscope having been only occasionally applied to, for the verification of what had been previously worked out, or for the examination of such minute details as the power employed did not suffice to reveal. But it should be urged upon such as are anxious to do service to science, by the publication of discoveries which they suppose themselves to have made with comparatively imperfect instru- ments, that they will do well to refrain from bringing these for- ward, until they shall have obtained the opportunity of verifying them with better. It is, as already remarked, when an object is least clearly seen, that there is most room for the exercise of the imagination; and there was sound sense in the reply once made by a veteran observer, to one who had been telling him of won-' derful discoveries which another was said to have made “zn spite of the badness of his Microscope,”—“ No, sir, it was in conse- quence of the badness of his Microscope.” If those who observe, with however humble an instrument, will but rigidly observe the rule of recording only what they can elearly see, they can neither go far astray themselves, nor seriously mislead others. Among the erroneous tendencies which Microscopic inquiry seems especially fitted to correct, is that which leads to the esti- mation of things by their merely sensuous or material greatness, instead of by their value in extending our ideas and elevating our aspirations. For we cannot long scrutinize the “world of small” to which we thus find access, without having the convic- tion forced upon us, that all size is but relative, and that mass has nothing to do with real grandeur. There is something in the extreme of minuteness, which is no less wonderful,—might it not almost be said, no less majestic ?—than the extreme of vastness. If the mind loses itself in the contemplation of the immeasurable depths of space, and of the innumerable multi- tudes of stars and systems by which they are peopled, it is equally lost in wonder and admiration, when the eye is turned to those countless multitudes of living beings which a single drop of 64 INTRODUCTION. water may c8ntain, and when the attention is given to the won- drous succession of phenomena which the life-history of every individual among them exhibits, and to the order and constancy ‘which this presents. Still more is this the case, when we direct our scrutiny to the penetration of that universe which may be said to be included in the body of Man, or of any one of the higher forms of organized being, and survey the innumerable assemblage of elementary parts, each having its own independent life, yet each working in perfect harmony with the rest, for the completion of the wondrous aggregate which the life of the whole presents. In the study of the one class of phenomena, no less than in the survey of the other, we are led towards that Infinity, in comparison with which the greatest and the least among the objects of Man’s regard are equally insignificant; and in that Infinity alone can we seek for a Wisdom to design, or a Power to execute, results so vast and so varied, by the orderly co-opera- tion of the most simple means. e CHAPTER I. OPTICAL PRINCIPLES OF THE MICROSCOPE. 1. Att Microscopes in ordinary use, whether simple or com- pound, depend for their magnifying power on that influence exerted by lenses in altering the course of the rays of light pass- ing through them, which is termed refraction. This influence takes place in accordance with the two following laws, which are fully explained and illustrated in every elementary treatise on. optics.? I. A ray of light passing from a rarer into a denser medium, is refracted towards a line drawn perpendicularly to the plane which divides them; and vice versa. II. The sines of the angles of inetdence and refraction (that. is, of the angles which the ray makes with the perpendicular before and after its refraction) bear to one another a constant ratio for each substance, which is known as its index of refraction. It follows from the first of these laws, that a ray of light enter- ing any denser medium perpendicularly, undergoes no refraction, but continues in its straight course; and from the second, that the rays nearest the perpendicular are refracted less than those more distant from it. The “index of refraction” is determined for different substances, by the amount of the refractive influence which they exert upon rays passing into them, not from air, but from a vacuum; and in expressing it, the sine of the angle of refraction is considered as the unzt, to which that of the angle of incidence bears a fixed relation. Thus when we say that the “index of refraction” of Water is 1:336, we mean that the sine of the angle of incidence of a ray passing into water from a -vacuum, is to that of the angle of refraction, as 1:336 to 1, or almost exactly as 14 to 1, or as 4to 3. And thus, the angle of incidence being given, that of the angle of refraction may be found by dividing it by the index of refraction. 2. On the other hand, when a ray emerges from a dense medium into a rare one, it is bent from the perpendicular, accord- ‘It is not considered necessary in the present Treatise, to describe the reflecting Microscope of Amici; since this, although superior to the Microscopes in use previously to its introduction, has been completely superseded by the application of the Achromatic principle to the ordinary Microseope. 2 See especially Dr. Golding Bird's “ Manual of Natural Philosophy,” Chap, XXII. 5 e 66 OPTICAL PRINCIPLES OF THE MICROSCOPE, ing to the same ratio; and to find the course of the emergent ray, the sine of the angle of incidence must be multiplied by the “index of refraction,” which will give the sine of the angle of refraction. Now when an emergent ray falls very obliquely upon the surface, the refraction which it woyld sustain in passing forth, tending as it does to deflect it still farther from the per- pendicular, becomes so great that the ray cannot pass out at all, and is reflected back from the plane which separates the two media, into the one from which it was emerging. This internal reflection will take place, whenever the product of the sine of the angle of incidence, multiplied by the index of refraction, exceeds the sine of 90°, which is the radius of the circle; and therefore the “limiting angle,” beyond which an oblique ray suffers in- ternal reflection, varies for different substances in proportion to their respective indices of refraction. Thus, the index of refrac- tion of water being 1-336, no ray can pass out of it into a vacuum," if its angle of incidence exceed 48° 28’, since the sine of that angle, multiplied by 1-336, equals the radius; and in like manner, the “limiting angle” for flint-glass, its index of refraction being 1:60, is 88° 41’. This fact imposes certain limits upon the performance of microscopic Lenses; whilst at the same time it enables the optician to make most advantageous use of glass Prisms for the purpose of reflection; the proportion of the light which they throw back being much greater than that returned from the best polished metallic surfaces, and the brilliancy of the reflected image being consequently higher. Such prisms are of great value to the Microscopist for particular purposes, as will hereafter appear (§§ 40, 41, 57, 60). 3. The lenses employed in the construction of Microscopes are chiefly convex ; those of the opposite kind, or coneave, being only used to make certain modifications in the course of the rays pass- ing through convex lenses, whereby their performance is rendered more exact (§§ 10, 12). It is easily shown to be in accordance with the laws of refraction already cited, that when a “pencil” of parallel rays, passing through air, impinges upon a conver surface of glass, the rays will be made to converge; for they will be bent towards the centre of the circle, the radius being the perpendicu- lar to each point of curvature. The central or axial ray, as it coincides with the perpendicular, will undergo no refraction; the others will be bent from their original course in an increasing * degree, in proportion as they fall at a distance from the centre of the lens; and the effect upon the whole will be such, that they will be caused to meet at a point, called the focus, some distance beyond the centre of curvature. This effect will not be materi- ‘ The reader may easily make evident to himself the internal reflection of water, by nearly filling a wineglass with water, and holding it at a higher level than his eye, so that he sees the surface of the fluid obliquely from beneath; no object held above the water will then be visible through it, if the eye be placed beyond the limiting angle; whilst the surface itself will appear as if silvered, through its reflecting back to the eye the light which falls upon it from beneath. REFRACTION BY CONVEX LENSES. 67 ally changed by allowing rays to pass into air again through a plane surface of glass, perpendicular to the axial ray (Fig. 1); a lens of this description is called a plano-convex lens; and it will hereafter be shown to possess properties, which render it very useful in the construction of microscopes. But if, instead of passing through a plane surface, the rays re-enter the air through a second convex surface, turned in the opposite direction, as in a double-convex lens, they will be made to converge still more. This will be readily comprehended, when it is borne in mind that the contrary direction of the second surface, and the Fic. 1. Fie. 2. a Parallel rays, falling on a plano-convez lens, Parallel rays, falling on a double-convex lens, brought to a focus at the distance of its diameter; brought to a focus in its centre ; conversely, rays and conversely, rays diverging from that point, diverging from that point, rendered parallel. rendered parallel. . contrary direction of its refraction (this being from the denser me- dium instead of into it), antagonize each other ; so that the second convex surface exerts an influence on the course of the rays pass- ing through it, which is almost exactly equivalent to that of the first. Hence the focus of a double-convex lens will be just half the distance, or (as commonly expressed) will be at half the length, of the focus of a plano-convex lens having the same cur- vature on one side (Fig. 2). 4. The distance of the focus from the lens will depend, not merely upon its degree of curvature, but also upon the refracting power of the substance of which it may be formed; since the lower the index of refraction, the less will the oblique rays be deflected towards the axial ray, and the more remote will be their point of meeting ; and conversely, the greater the refractive index, the more will the oblique rays be deflected towards the axial ray, and the nearer will be their point of convergence. A lens made of any substance whose index of refraction is 1:5, will bring parallel rays to a focus at the distance of its diameter of curva- ture, after they have passed through one convex surface (Fig. 1), and at the distance of its radius of curvature, after they have passed through éwo convex surfaces (Fig. 2); and as this ratio almost exactly expresses the refractive power of ordinary Glass, we may for all practical purposes consider the “principal focus” (as the focus for parallel rays is termed), of a double-convex lens 68 OPTICAL PRINCIPLES OF THE MICROSCOPE, to be at the distance of its radius, that is, in its centre of ctirva- ture, and that of a plano-convex lens to be at the distance of twice its radius, that is, at the other end of the diameter of its sphere of curvature. 5. It is evident from what has preceded, that as a double-con- vex lens brings parallel rays to a focus in its centre of curvature, it will on the other hand cause those rays to assume a parallel direction, which are diverging from that centre before they im- pinge upon it (Fig. 2); so that, if a luminous body be placed in the principal focus of a double-convex lens, its divergent rays, falling on one surface of the lens as a cone, will pass forth from its other side as a cylinder. Again, if rays already converging fall upon a double-convex lens, they will be brought together at a point nearer to it than its centre of curvature (Fig. 3); whilst, if the incident rays be diverging from a distant point, their focus will be more distant from the lens than its principal focus (Fig. 4). Fia. 3. Fia. 4. Rays already converging. brought to- Rays diverging from points more distant than the gether at a point nearer than the principal principal focus on either side, brought to a focus be- focus; and rays diverging from a point yond it; if the point of divergence be within the circle within the principal focus, still diverging, of curvature, the focus of convergence will be beyond though in a diminished degree. it; and vice versa, The further from the point from which they diverge, the more nearly will the rays approach the parallel direction; until, at length, when the object is very distant, its rays in effect become parallel, and are brought together in the principal focus. If the rays which fall upon a double-convex lens, be diverging from the farther extremity of the diameter of its sphere of curvature, they will be brought to a focus at an equal distance on the other side of the lens; but the more the point of divergence is approximated to the centre or principal focus, the further removed on the other side will be the point of convergence, until, the point of diver- gence being at the centre, there is no convergence at all, the rays being merely rendered parallel. If the point of divergence be within the principal focus, they will neither be brought to eon- verge nor be rendered parallel, but will diverge in a diminished degree (Fig. 3). The same principles apply equally to a plano- convex lens; allowance being made for the double distance of its principal focus. They also apply to a lens whose surfaces have REFRACTION BY CONVEX AND CONCAVE LENSES. 69 different curvatures; the principal focus of such a lens is found by multiplying the radius of one surface by the radius of the other, and dividing this product by half the sum of the same radii. The rules by which the foci of convex lenses may be found, for rays of different degrees of convergence and diver- gence, will be found in works on Optics. 6. The refracting influence of concave lenses will evidently be precisely the opposite of that of convex. Rays which fall upon them in a parallel direction, will be made to diverge as if from the principal focus, which is here called the negative focus. This will be, for a plano-concave lens, at the distance of the diameter of the sphere of curvature; and for a double-concave, in the centre of that sphere. In the same manner, rays which are con- verging to such a degree, that, if uninterrupted, they would have met in the principal focus, will be rendered parallel; if con- verging more, they will still meet, but at a greater distance ; and if converging less, they will diverge as from a negative focus at a greater distance than that for parallel rays. If already diverg- ing, they will diverge still more, as from a negative focus nearer than the principal focus; but this will approach the principal focus, in proportion as the distance of the point of divergence is such, that the direction of the rays approaches the parallel. 7. If a lens be convex on one side and concave on the other, forming what is called a meniscus, its effect will depend upon the proportion between the two curvatures. If they are equal, as in a watch glass, no perceptible effect will be produced; if the convex curvature be the greater, the effect will be that of a less powerful conver lens: and if the concave curvature be the more considerable, it will be that of a less powerful concave lens. The focus of convergence for parallel rays in the first case, and of divergence in the second, may be found by dividing the product, of the two radii by half their difference. 8. Hitherto we have considered only the effects of lenses upon a “pencil” of rays issuing from a single luminous point, and that point situated in the line of its axis. Ifthe point be situated above the line of its axis, the focus will be below it, and vice versd. The surface of every luminous body may be regarded as compre- hending an infinite number of such points, from every one of which a pencil of rays proceeds, and is refracted according to the laws already specified; so that a perfect but inverted image or picture of the object is formed upon any surface placed in the focus, and adapted to receive the rays. It will be evident from what has gone before, that if the object be placed at twice the distance of the principal focus, the image, being formed at an equal distance on the other side of the lens (§ 5), will be of the same dimensions with the object: whilst, on the other hand, if the object (Fig. 5, a 6) be nearer the lens, the image 4 B will be farther from it, and of larger dimensions; but if the object a B be farther from the lens, the image ad will be nearer to it, and 70 OPTICAL PRINCIPLES OF THE MICROSCOPE. smaller than itself. Further, it is to be remarked, that the larger the image in proportion to the object, the less bright it Fic. 5. will be, because the same amount of light has to be spread over a greater sur- face ; whilst an image that is smaller than the object, will be more brilliant in the same proportion. 9. The knowledge of these general facts will en- able us readily to under- stand the ordinary opera- tion of the Microscope; but the instrument is subject to cer- tain optical imperfections, the mode of remedying which can- not be comprehended without an acquaintance with their nature. One of these imperfections results from the une- qual refraction of the rays which have passed through lenses, whose curvatures are equal over their whole surfaces. If the course of the rays passing through an ordinary convex lens be carefully laid down (Fig. 6), it will be found that Fic. 6. they do not all meet exactly _in the foci already stated, AWB but that the focus F of the »- ~ rays AB, AB, which have “—ren F passed through the periphe- = F SSS ral portion of the lens, is much closer to it than that B of the rays ad, a5, which are nearer the line of its axis; Diagram illustrating Spherical Aberration. so that, if a sereen be held in the former, the rays which have passed through the central portion of the lens will be stopped by it before they have come to a focus; and if the screen be carried back into the focus of the latter, the rays which were most distant from the axis will have previously met and crossed, so that they will come to it in a state of divergence, and will pass to¢ and d. In either case, there- fore, the image will have a certain degree of indistinctness ; and there is no one point to which all the rays can be brought by a single lens of spherical curvature. The difference between the focal points of the central and of the peripheral rays, is termed the Spherical Aberration. Itis obvious that, to produce the de- sired effect, the curvature requires to be increased around the centre of the lens, so as to bring the rays which pass through it more speedily to a focus; and to be diminished towards the cir- cumference, so as to throw the focus of the rays influenced by it to a greater distance. The requisite conditions may be theoreti- cally fulfilled by a lens, one of whose surfaces, instead of being spherical, should be a portion of an elfipsoid or hyperboloid of Formation of Images by convex lenses. SPHERICAL AND CHROMATIC ABERRATION, 71 certain proportions; but the difficulties in the way of the mecha- nical execution of lenses of this description are such, that, for practical purposes, this plan of construction is altogether un- available. 9 a. Various means have been devised for reducing the Aber- ration of lenses of spherical curvature. It may be considerably diminished, by making the most advantageous use of ordinary lenses. Thus, the aberration of a plano-convex lens, whose con- vex side is turned towards parallel rays, is only jy ths of its thickness; whilst, if its plane side be turned towards them, the aberration is 44 times the thickness of the lens. Hence, in the employment of a plano-convex lens, its convex surface should be turned towards a distant object, when it is used to form an image by bringing to a focus parallel or slightly diverging rays; but it should be turned towards the eye, when it is used to render parallel the rays which are diverging from a very near object. The single lens having the least spherical aberration, is a.double- convex whose radii are as one to six: when its flattest face is turned towards parallel rays, the aberration is nearly 34 times its thickness; but when its most convex side receives or trans- mits them, the aberration is only ;3,ths of its thickness. The aberration is further diminished, by reducing the aperture or working-surface of the lens, so as to employ only the rays that pass through the central part, which, if sufficiently small in pro- portion to the whole sphere, will bring them all to nearly the same focus. The use of this may be particularly noticed in the object-glasses of common (non-achromatic) Microscopes; in which, whatever be the size of the lens itself, the greater portion of its surface is rendered inoperative by a stop, which is a plate with a circular aperture interposed between the lens and the rest of the instrument. If this aperture be gradually enlarged, it will be seen that, although the image becomes more and more illdminated, it is at the same time becoming more and more in- distinct; and that, in order to gain defining power, the aperture must be reduced again. Now this reduction is attended with two great inconveniences ; im the first place, the loss of intensity of light, the degree of which will depend upon the quantity transmitted by the lens, and will vary, therefore, with its aper- ture; and, secondly, the diminution of the “angle of aperture,”’ that is, of the angle (a6, Fig. 8) made by the most diverging of the rays of the pencil issuing from any point of an object, which can enter the lens; on the extent of which angle depend some of the most important qualities of a Microscope (§ 100). 10. The Spherical Aberration may be got rid of altogether, however, by making use of combinations of lenses, so disposed that their opposite aberrations shall correct each other, whilst magnifying power is still.gained. For it is easily seen that, as the aberration of a concave lens is just the opposite of that of a convex lens, the aberration of a convex lens placed in its most ee OPTICAL PRINCIPLES OF THE MICROSCOPE. favorable position may be corrected by a concave lens of much less power in its most unfavorable position; so that, although the power of the convex lens is weakened, all the rays which pass through this combination will be brought to one focus. It is by a method of this kind, that the Optician aims to correct the spherical aberration, in the construction of those combinations of lenses which are now employed as object-glasses, in all Com- pound Microscopes that are of any real value as instruments of observation. But it sometimes happens that this correction is not perfectly made; and the want of it becomes evident, in the fog by which the distinctness of the image of the object, and especially the precision of its outlines, is obscured. 11. But the spherical aberration is not the only imperfection with which the optician has to contend in the construction of microscopes. A difficulty equally serious arises from the unequal refrangibility of the several colored rays, which together make up white or colorless light,' so that they are not all brought to the same focus, even by a lens free from spherical aberration. It is this difference in their refrangibility, which causes their complete separation by the prism into a spectrum; and it mani- fests itself, though in a less degree, in the image formed by a convex lens. For if parallel rays of white light fall upon a con- vex surface, the most refrangible of its component rays, namely, the violet, will be brought to a focus at a point somewhat nearer to the lens than the principal focus, which is the mean of the whole; and the converse will be true of the red rays, which are the least refrangible, and whose foeus will therefore be more dis- tant. Thus in Fig. 7, the rays of white light, az, a B, which fall on the peripheral portion of the lens, are so far de- composed, that the violet FE rays are brought to a focus y == p> at co, and crossing thére, ad = diverge again and pass on el ee = towards FF. On the other * hand, the red rays are not brought to a focus until D, Diagram illustrating Chromatic Aberration. and cross the diverging violet rays atu E. The foci of the intermediate rays of’ the spec- trum (indigo, blue, green, yellow, and orange) are intermediate between these two extremes. If the image be received upon a sereen placed at c, the focus of the violet rays, violet will pre- dominate in its own color, and it will be surrounded by a pris- matic fringe in which blue, green, yellow, orange, and red may be successively distinguished. If, on the other hand, the screen be placed at p, the focus of the red rays, the image will have a Fia, 7. ‘It has been deemed better to adhere to the ordinary phraseology, when speaking of this fact, as more generally intelligible than the language in which it might be more scientifically described, and at the same time leading to no practical error. CHROMATIC ABERRATION. 73 predominantly red tint, and will be surrounded by a series of colored fringes in inverted order, formed by the other rays of the spectrum, which have met and crossed.! The line £ £, which joins the points of intersection between the red and the violet rays, marks the “mean focus,” that is the situation in which the colored fringes will be narrowest, the “‘dispersion’’ of the colored rays being the least; whilst the interval c p, which separates the foci of the extreme rays, is termed the Chromatic Aberration of the lens. As the axial ray a’ B’ undergoes no refraction, neither does it sustain any dispersion; and the nearer the rays are to the axial ray, the less dispersion do they suffer. Again, the more oblique the direction of the rays, whether they pass through the central or the peripheral portion of the lens, the greater will be the refraction they undergo, and the greater also will be their dispersion; and thus it happens that when, by using only the central part of a lens (§ 12), the chromatic aberration is reduced to its minimum, the central part of a picture may be tolerably free from false colors, whilst its marginal portion shall exhibit broad fringes.’ 12. The Chromatic Aberration of a lens, like the Spherical, may be diminished by the contraction of its aperture, so that only its central portion is employed. But the error cannot be got rid of entirely by any such reduction, which, for the reasons already mentioned, is in itself extremely undesirable. Hence it is of the ‘first importance in the construction of a really efficient Microscope, that the chromatic aberration of its “object-glasses” (in which the principal dispersion is liable to occur) should be entirely corrected, so that the largest possible aperture should be given to these lenses, without the production of any false colors. No such correction can be accomplished even theoretically in a single lens; but it may be effected by the combination of two or more, advantage being taken of the different relations which the refractive and the dispersive powers bear to each other in different substances. For if we can unite with a convex lens, whose dis- persive power is dow as compared with its refractive power, a concave of lower curvature, whose dispersive power is relatively high, it is obvious that the dispersion of the rays occasioned by the convex lens may be effectually neutralized by the opposite dispersion of the concave (§ 6); whilst the refracting power of the convex is only lowered by the opposite refraction of the con- cave, in virtue of the longer focus of the latter. No difficulty stands in the way of carrying this theoretical correction into practice. For the “dispersive” power of flint-glass bears so much larger a ratio to its refractive power than does that of ! This experiment is best tried with a lens of Jong focus, of which the central part is eovered with an opaque stop, so that the light passes only through a peripheral ring; since, if its whole aperture be in use, the regular formation of the fringes is interfered with by the spherical aberration, which gives a different focus to the rays passing through each annular zone. 2 2 This is well seen in the large pictures exhibited by Oxy-hydrogen Microscopes. 74 OPTICAL PRINCIPLES OF THE MICROSCOPE. erown-glass, that a convex lens of the former, the focal length of which is 72 inches, will produce the same degree of color as a convex lens of crown-glass, whose focal length is 43 inches. Hence a concave lens of the former material and curvature, will fully correct the dispersion of a convex lens of the latter; whilst it diminishes its refractive power only to such an extent as to make its focus 10 inches. The correction for chromatic aberra- tion in such a lens would be perfect, if it were not that, although the extreme rays, violet and red, are thus brought to the same focus, the dispersion of the rest is not equally compensated; so that what is termed a secondary spectrum is produced, the images of objects seen through such a lens being bordered on one side with a purple fringe, and on the other with a green fringe. Moreover such a lens is not corrected for spherical aberration ; and it must of course be rendered free from this, to be of any real service, however complete may be the freedom of its image from false colors. The double correction may be accomplished theoretically by the combination of three lenses, namely, a double- concave of flint placed between two double-convex of crown, ground to certain curvatures; and this method has long been employed in the construction of the large object-glasses of Tele- scopes, which are, by means of it, rendered Achromatic,—that is, are enabled to exert their refractive power without producing either chromatic or spherical aberration. 13. It has only been of late years, however, that the construc- tion of Achromatic object-glasses for Microscopes has been con- sidered practicable; their extremely minute size having been thought to forbid the attainment of that accuracy which is neces- sary in the adjustment of the several curvatures, in order that the errors of each separate lens which enters into the combina- tion, may be effectually balanced by the opposite errors of the rest. The first successful, attempt was made in this direction, in the year 1823, by M. Selligues of Paris; the plan which he adopted being that of the combination of two or more pairs of lenses, each pair consisting of a double-convex of crown-glass, and a plano-concave of flint. In the next year, Mr. Tulley of London, without any knowledge of what M. Selligues had ac- complished, applied himself (at the suggestion of Dr. Goring) to the construction of achromatic object-glasses for the microscope ; and succeeded in producing a single combination of three lenses (on the telescope plan), the corrections of which were extremely complete. This combination, however, was not of high power, nor of large angular aperture; and it was found that these ad- vantages could not be gained, without the addition of a second combination. Prof. Amici at Modena, also, who attempted the construction of microscopic object-glasses as early as 1812, but, despairing of success, had turned his attention to the application of the reflecting principle to the Microscope, resumed his original labors on hearing of the success of M. Selligues; and, by work- ACHROMATIC OBJECT-GLASS. 75 ing on his plan, he produced, in 1827, an achromatic combination of three pairs of lenses, which surpassed anything of the same kind that had been previously executed. From that time, the superiority of the plan of combining three pairs of lenses (Fig. 8; 1, 2, 3), which should be so adjusted as to correct each other’s errors, to the telescopic combinations adopted by Mr. Tulley, may be considered to have been completely established; and English opticians, working on this method, soon rivalled the best productions of Continental skill. 14. It was in this country that the next im- portant improvements originated; these being the result of the theoretical investigations of Mr. J. J. Lister,’ which led him to the discovery of certain properties in achromatic combinations, that had not been previously detected. Acting upon the rules which he laid down, practical b opticians at once succeeded in producing com- Section of an Achromatic binations far superior to any which had been = M18 previously executed, both in wideness of aperture, flatness of field, and perfectness of correction; and continued progress has been since made in the same direction, by the like combination of theoretical acumen with manipulative skill.2 For the subse- quent investigations of Mr. Lister have led him to suggest new combinations, which have been speedily carried into practical execution; and there is good reason to believe that the limit of perfection has now been nearly reached, since almost everything which seems theoretically possible has been actually accom- plished. The most perfect combinations at present in use for high powers, consist of as many as ezght distinct lenses; namely, in front, a triplet composed of two plano-convex lenses of crown- glass, with a plano-concave of dense flint between them; next, a doublet, composed of a double-convex of crown, and a double- Fig. 8. 1 See his Memoir in the “ Philosophical Transactions,” for 1829. 2 The first British Opticians (after Mr. Tulley) who applied themselves to the con- struction of Achromatic object-glasses for microscopes, were Mr. Ross and Mr. Powell. Mc. James Smith did not enter the field until] some time afterwards; but, having the advantage of Mr. Lister's special superintendence, he soon equalled, in the lower powers at least, the best productions of his predecessors. With Mr. Ross, his son bas been subsequently associated: with Mr. Powell, his brother-in-law, Mr. Lealand ; and with Mr. Smith, Mr. Beck, a nephew of Mr. Lister. These three firms have constantly kept up an honorable rivalry, which has been very advantageous to the perfectionnement of the Microscope; and have maintained a position which is still far in advance of that of all other manufacturing Opticians in this country or the Continent. The lenses pro- duced by each are distinguished by excellencies of their own; and it would be scarcely possible fairly to assign an absolute preference to either above the others. Among the amateurs who have occupied themselves in the construction of microscopic Achromatics, Mr. Wenham has been the most successful. An American rival has recently been announced, in the person of Mr. Spencer; who, taking advantage of all that had been previously accomplished, is said to have produced combinations not only equalling, but, in some important particulars, surpassing those of English makers. Only one of these, however, has found its way (the author believes) 10 this country; and not having had the opportunity of seeing it himself, be can only judge of it by report. (See Appendix.) 76 OPTICAL PRINCIPLES OF THE MICROSCOPE. concave of flint; and at the back, another triplet, consisting of two double-convex lenses of crown, with a double-concave of flint interposed between them. By the use of this combination, an angular aperture of no less than 170° has been obtained with an objective of 1-12th inch focus; and it is obvious that as an increase of divergence of no more than 10° would bring the ex- treme rays into a straight line with each other, they would not enter the lens at all; so that no further enlargement of the aper- ture can be practically useful. 15. The enlargement of the angle of aperture, and the greater ‘completeness of the corrections, first obtained by the adoption of | Mr. Lister’s principles, soon rendered sensible an imperfection in ‘the performance of these lenses under certain circumstances which had previously passed unnoticed ; and the important discovery was made by Mr. Ross, that a very obvious dif: ference existed in the precision of the image, according as the object is viewed with or with- out a covering of tale or thin glass; an object-glass which is perfectly adapted to either of these conditions, being sensi- bly defective under the other. The mode in which this differ ence arises, is explained by Mr. Ross as follows.! Let 0, Fig. 9, be any point of an object; o p the axial ray of the pencil that diverges from it; and o1, 01’, two diverging rays, the one near to, the other remote from, the axialray. Now ife@e@aeé * represent the section of a piece of thin glass, intervening between the object and the object-glass, the rays o T and o 1’ will be re- fracted in their passage through it, in the directions TR, 1’ RB’; and on emerging from it again, they will pass on towards E and BE’, Now if the course of these emergent rays be traced back- wards, as by the dotted lines, the ray ZR will seem to have issued from x, and the ray 8’ R’ from y; and the distance x y is an aberration quite sufficient to disturb the previous balance of the aberrations of the lens composing the object-glass. The requi- site correction may be effected, as Mr. Ross pointed out, by giv- ing to the front pair (Fig. 8,1) of the three of which the objective is composed, an excess of positive aberration (7. e. by under-cor- recting it), and by giving to the other two pairs (2, 3) an excess of negative aberration (¢.e. by over-correcting them), and by making the distance between the former and the latter susceptible of alteration. For when the front pair is approximated most nearly to the other two, and its distance from the object is increased, Fig. 9. ' “ Transactions of the Society of Arts,” vol. li. CORRECTION FOR COVERING OF THE OBJECT. 17 its positive aberration is more strongly exerted upon the other pairs, than it is when the distance between the lenses is increased, and the distance between the front pair and the object is dimi- nished. Consequently, if the lenses be so adjusted that their cor- rection is perfect for an uncovered object, the front pair being removed to a certain distance from the others, its approximation to them will give to the whole combination an excess of positive aberration, which will neutralize the negative aberration occa- sioned by covering the object with a thin plate of glass.1' It is obvious that this correction will be more important to the perfect performance of the combination, the larger is its angle of aper- ture; since, the wider the divergence of the oblique rays from the axial ray, the greater will be the refraction which they will sustain in passing through a plate of glass, and the greater there- fore will be the negative aberration produced, which will, if un- corrected, seriously impair the distinctness of the image. And it is consequently not required for low powers, whose angle of aperture is comparatively small; nor even for the higher, so long as their angle of aperture does not exceed 50°. As a large pro- portion of the lenses made by foreign Opticians do not range beyond this, the adjustment in question may be dispensed with; and even where the angle is much larger, if the corrections be made perfect for a thickness of glass of 1-100th of an inch (which is about an average of that with which objects of the finer kind are usually covered), they will not be much deranged by a dif ference of a few hundredths of an inch, more or less, in that amount. . 16. We are now prepared to enter upon the application of the optical principles which have been explained and illustrated in the foregoing pages, to the construction of microscopes. These are distinguished as simple, and compound ; each kind having its peculiar advantages to the Student of Nature. Their essential difference consists in this ;—that in the former, the rays of light which enter the eye of the observer proceed directly from the object itself, after having been subject only to a change in their course; whilst in the latter, an enlarged image of the object is formed by a lens, which image is viewed by the observer through a simple microscope, as if it were the object itself. The simple * microscope may consist of one lens; but (as will be presently shown) it may be formed of two, or epyen three; these, however, are so disposed as to produce an action upon the rays of light corresponding to that of a single lens. In the compound micro- scope, on the other hand, not less than two lenses must be em- ployed; one to form the enlarged image of the object, and this, being nearest to it, is called the object-glass; whilst the other again magnifies that image, being interposed between it and the eye of the observer, and is hence called the eye-glass. A perfect ! The mode in which this adjustment is effected, will be more fitly described here- after (§ 82). 78 OPTICAL PRINCIPLES OF THE MICROSCOPE. object-glass, as we have seen, must consist of a combination of lenses ; and the eye-glass, as we shall presently see (§ 21), is best constructed by placing two lenses in a certain relative position, forming what is termed an eye-piece. These two kinds of in- strument need to be separately considered in detail. _ 17. Simple Microscope.—In order to gain a clear notion of the mode in which a single lens serves to “magnify” minute objects, it is necessary to revert to the phenomena of ordinary vision. An eye free from any defect has a considerable power of adjust- ing itself, in such a manner as to gain a distinct view of objects placed at extremely varying distances; but the image formed upon the retina will of course vary in size with the distance of the object; and the amount of detail perceptible in it will fol- low the same proportion. To ordinary eyes, however, there is a limit within which no distinct image can be formed, on account of the too great divergence of the rays of the different pencils which then enter the eye ; since the eye is usually adapted to re- ceive, and to bring to a focus, rays which are parallel or but slightly divergent. This limit is variously stated at from five to ten inches; we are inclined to think from our own observations, that the latter estimate is nearest the truth; that is, although a person with an ordinary vision may see an object much nearer to his eye, he will see little if any more of its details, since what is gained in size will be lost in distinctness. Now the utility of a convex lens interposed between a near object and the eye, con- sists in its reducing the divergence of the rays forming the seve- ral pencils which issue from it; so that they enter the eye ina state of moderate divergence, as if they had issued from an ob- ject beyond the nearest limit of distinct vision; and a well-de- fined picture is consequently formed upon the retina. But not only is the course of the several rays in each pencil altered as regards the rest, by this refracting process, but the course of the pencils themselves is changed, so that they enter the eye under an angle corresponding with that at which they would have ar- rived from a larger object situated ata greater distance. The picture formed upon the retina, therefore, by any object (Fig. 10), Fic. 10. corresponds in all respects with one which would have been made by the same ob- ject a 6 increased in its di- mensions to A B, and view- ed at the smallest ordinary distance of distinct vision. A “short-sighted” person, however, who can see ob- jects distinctly at a distance of two or three inches, has the same power in his eye Diagram illustrating the action of the Simple Microscope. alone, by reason ‘of ve greater convexity, as that which the person of ordinary vision SIMPLE MICROSCOPE. 79 gains by the assistance of a convex lens which shall enable him to see at the same distance with equal distinctness. It is evident, therefore, that the magnifying power of a single lens, depending as it does upon the proportion between the distance at which it renders the object visible, and the nearest distance of unaided. distinct vision, must be different to different eyes. ‘It is usually estimated, however, by finding how many times the focal length of the lens is contained in ten inches; since, in order to render the rays from the object nearly parallel, it must be placed nearly in the focus of the lens (Fig. 2); and the picture is referred by the mind to an object at the ordinary distance. Thus, if the focal length of a lens be one inch, its magnifying power for each dimension will be ten times, and consequently a hundred super- ficial ; if its focal distance be only one-tenth of an inch, its mag- nifying power will be a hundred linear, gr ten thousand superti- cial. ‘The use of the convex lens has the further advantage of bringing to the eye a much greater amount of light, than would have entered the pupil from the enlarged object at the ordinary distance, provided its own diameter be greater than that of the pupil; but this can only be the case when its magnifying power is low. 18. It is obviously desirable, especially when lenses of very high magnifying power are being employed, that their aperture should be as large as possible; since the light issuing from a minute object has then té be diffused over a large picture, and will be proportionally diminished in intensity. But the shorter the focus, the less must be the diameter of the sphere of which the lens forms a part ; and unless the aperture be proportionally diminished, the spherical and chromatic aberrations will inter- fere so much with the distinctness of the picture, that the ad- vantages: which might be anticipated from the use of such lenses will be almost negatived. Nevertheless, the Simple Microscope has been an instrument of extreme value in anatomical research, owing to its freedom from those errors to which the Compound Microscope, as originally constructed, was necessarily subject ; the greater certainty of its indications being evident from the fact, that the eye of the observer receives the rays sent forth by the object itself, instead of those which proceed from an image of that object. A detail of the means employed by different individuals,#for procuring lenses of extremely short focus, though possessing much interest in itself, would be misplaced here; since recent improvements, as will presently be shown, have superseded the necessity of all these. It may be stated, how- ever, that Leeuwenhoeck, De la Torre, and others among the older microscopists, made great use of small globules procured by fusion of threads or particles of glass. The most important suggestion for the improvement of the Simple Microscope com- posed of a single lens, proceeded some years ago from Dr. Brewster, who proposed to substitute diamond, sapphire, garnet, 80 OPTICAL PRINCIPLES OF THE MICROSCOPE and other precious stones of high refractive power, for glass, as the material of single lenses. A lens of much longer radius of curvature might thus be employed, to gain an equal magnifying power ; and the aperture would admit of great extension, with- out a proportional increase in the spherical and chromatic aber- rations. This suggestion has been carried into practice with complete success, as regards the performance of lenses executed on this plan; but the difficulties of various kinds in the way of their execution, are such as to render them very expensive; and as they are not superior to the combination now to be described, they have latterly been quite superseded by it. This combina- tion, first proposed by Dr. Wollaston, and known as his doublet, consists of two plano-convex lenses, whose focal lengths are in the proportion of one to three, or nearly so, having their convex sides directed towards the eye, and the lens of shortest focal length nearest the objéct. In Dr. Wollaston’s original combina- tion, no perforated diaphragm (or “ stop’) was interposed; and the distances between the lenses was left to be determined by ex- periment in each case. A great improvement was subsequently made, however, by the introduction of a “stop” between the lenses, and by the division of the power of the smaller lens be- tween two (especially when a very short focus is required) so as to form a triplet, as was first suggested by Mr. Holland.* When combinations of this kind are well constructed, both the spheri- cal and the chromatic aberrations are so much reduced, that the angle of aperture nay be considerably enlarged without much sacrifice of distinctness; and hence for all powers above 1-4th inch focus, doublets and triplets are far superior to single lenses. The performance of even the best of these forms of Simple mi- croscope, however, is so far inferior to that of a good Compound microscope as now constructed upon the achromatic principle, that no one who has the command of the latter form of instru- ment would ever use the higher powers of the former. It is for the prosecution of observations, and for the carrying on of dis- sections, which only require low powers, that the Simple micro- scope is to be preferred; and, consequently, although doublets and triplets afforded the best means of obtaining a high magni- fying power, before Achromatic lenses were brought to their pre- sent perfection, they are now comparatively little used. 19. Another form of simple magnifier, possessing certain ad- vantages over the ordinary double-convex lens, is that commonly known by the name of the “Coddington” lens. The first idea of it was given by Dr. Wollaston, who proposed to cement to- gether two plano-convex, or hemispherical lenses, by their plane sides, with a stop interposed, the central aperture of which should be equal to 1-5th of the focal length. The great advantage of such a lens is, that the oblique pencils pass, like the centre ones, at right angles with the surface ; and that they are consequently but little subject to aberration. The idea was further improved 1 « Transactions of the Society of Arts,” vol. xlix. STANHOPE LENS—COMPOUND MICROSCOPE, 81 upon by Mr. Coddington, who pointed out that the same end would be much better answered by taking a sphere of glass, and grinding a deep groove in its equatorial part, which should. be then filled with opaque matter, so as to limit the central aper- ture. Such a lens gives a large field of view, admits a considera- ble amount of light, and is equally good in all directions ;. but its powers of definition are by no means equal to those of an achromatic lens, or even of a doublet. This form is chiefly use- ful, therefore, as a hand magnifier, in which neither high power nor perfect definition is required; its peculiar qualities rendering it supetior to an ordinary lens of the same power, for the class of objects for which such lenses are applied in this mode. We think it right to state that many of the magnifiers sold as “ Cod- dington”’ lenses are not really (as we have satisfied ourselves) portions of spheres, but are manufactured out of ordinary double- convex lenses, and will be destitute, therefore, of many of the above advantages. It may be desirable to allude to the magni- fier known under the name of the “Stanhope” lens, which some- what resembles the “Coddington” in appearance, but differs from it essentially in properties. It is nothing more than a double-convex lens, having two surfaces’of unequal curvatures, separated from each other by a considerable thickness of glass ; the distance of the two surfaces from each other being so ad- justed, that when the most convex is turned towards the eye, minute objects placed on the other surface shall be in the focus of the lens. This is an easy mode of applying a rather high magnifying power to scales of butterflies’ wings and other similar flat and minute objects, which will readily adhere to the surface of the glass; and it also ‘serves to detect the presence of the larger animalcules, or of crystals in minute drops of fluid, to ex- hibit the “eels” in paste or vinegar, &. &c. ; but it is almost en- tirely destitute of value as an instrument of scientific research, and can scarcely be regarded in any higher light than as an in- genious philosophical toy.! 20. Compound Microscope.—In its most simple form, this instru- ment consists of only two lenses, the “‘object-glass” and the “eye- glass:” the former, ¢ p (Fig. 11), receiving the rays of light direct from the object, 4 B, which is brought into near proximity to it, forms an enlarged and inverted image a’ 8’ at a greater distance on the other side; whilst the latter, L M, receives the rays which are diverging from this image, as if they proceeded from an object actually occupying its position and enlarged to its dimen- sions, and these it brings to the eye at £, so altering their course as to make that image appear far larger to the eye, precisely as in the case of the simple microscope (§ 16). It is obvious that by the use of the very same lenses, a considerable variety of magnifying power may be obtained, simply by altering their 'The principal forms of construction of Simple Microscopes, will be described in the next chapter. ; : 6 82 OPTICAL PRINCIPLES OF THE MICROSCOPE. position in regard to each other and to the object; for if the eye- glass be carried further from the object-glass, whilst the object is approximated nearer to the latter, the image a’ 8B’ will be formed at a greater distance from it, and its dimensions will consequently be augmented. If on the other hand, the eye-glass be brought nearer to the object-glass, whilst the object is removed further from it, the distance of the image will be shortened, and its dimensions proportionably diminished. We shall hereafter see that this mode of varying the magnifying power of compound microscopes may be turned to good account in more than one. fee. a Fie. 1 mode (§§ 43, 44); but there are _ limits to the use which can be advantageously made of it.— The amplification may also be varied by altering the magni- fying power of the eye-glass; but here, too, there are limits to the increase; since defects of the object-glass, which are not perceptible when its image is but moderately enlarged, are brought into injurious promi- nence when the imperfect im- age is amplified to a much greater extent. In practice, it is generally found much better to vary the power, by employ- ing object-glasses of different foci; an object-glass of long focus forming an image, which is not at many times the dis- tance of the object from the other side of the lens, and which, therefore, is not of many times its dimension; whilst an object-glass of short focus requires that the object should be so nearly approxi- mated to it, that the distance of the image is a much higher ae of that of the object, ; and its dimensions are propor- ee ee ee aly liom, Uk ae scope. scope. ever mode additional amplifica- tion be obtained, two things must always result from the change: the portion of the surface of the object, of which an image can be formed, must be diminished; and the quantity of light spread over that image must be proportionably lessened. 21. In addition to the two lenses of which the Compound Microscope essentially consists, another (Fig. 12, r F) is usually CONSTRUCTION OF COMPOUND MICROSCOPE. 83 introduced between the object-glass and the image formed by it. The ordinary purpose of this lens is to'change the course of the rays in such a manner, that the image may be formed of dimen- sions not too great for the whole of it to come within the range of the eye-piece; and as it thus allows more of the object to be seen at once, it is called the field-glass. It is now usually considered, however, as belonging to the ocular end of the instrument,—the eye-glass and the field-glass being together termed the Hye-piece. Various forms of this eye-piece have been proposed by different opticians; and one or another will be preferred, according to the purpose for which it may be required. That which it is most advantageous, to employ with Achromatic object-glasses, to the performance of which it is desired to give the greatest possible effect, is termed the “‘Huyghenian;” having been employed by Huyghens for his telescopes, although without the knowledge of all the advantages which its best construction renders it capable of affording. It consists of two plano-convex lenses (EE and F F, Fig. 12), with their plane sides towards the eye; these are placed at a distance equal to half the sum of their focal lengths; or, to speak with more precision, at half the sum of the focal length of the eye-glass, and of the distance from the field-glass at which an image of the object-glass would be formed by it. A “stop” or diaphragm, B B, must be placed between the two lenses, in the visual focus of the eye-glass, which is, of course, the position wherein the image of the object will be formed, by the rays brought into convergence by their passage through the field-glass. By Huyghens, this arrangement was in- tended merely to diminish the spherical aberration; but it was subsequently shown by Boscovich, that the chromatic dispersion was also in a great part cor- rected by it. Since the introduction of Achromatic object-glasses for Com- pound Microscopes, it has been further shown that all error may be avoided by aslight over-correction of these; so that the blue and red rays may be caused to enter the eye in a parallel direction (though not actually coincident), and thus to produce a colorless image. Thus let p M Nn (Fig. 18), represent the two extreme rays of three pencils, which, without the field-glass, would — gooion or suygnenian Bye-piece form a blue image convex to the eye- adapted to over-corrected Achro- glass, at BB, and a red one at RR; then, ™ate oblectives. by the intervention of the field-glass, a blue image, concave to the eye-glass, is formed at B’ 8’, and a red one at R’ RB’. As the focus of the eye-glass is shorter for blue rays than for red rays, by just the difference in the place of these images, their rays, after refraction by it, enter the eye in a parallel direction, and 84 OPTICAL PRINCIPLES OF THE MICROSCOPE. produce a picture free from false color. If the object-glass had been rendered perfectly achromatic, the blue rays, after passing through the field-glass, would have been brought to a focus at}, and the red at 7; so that an error would be produced, which would have been increased instead of antagonized by the eye-glass. Another advantage of a well-constructed Huyghenian eye-piece is that the image produced by the meeting of the rays after passing through the field-glass, is by it rendered concave towards the eye-glass, instead of convex, so that every part of it may be in focus at the same time, and the field of view thereby rendered flat. 22. Two or more Huyghenian eye-pieces, of different magni- fying powers, known as Nos. 1, 2, 3, &c., are usually supplied with a Compound Microscope.. The utility of the higher powers will mainly depend upon the excellence of the objectives; for when an achromatic combination of small aperture, which is sufficiently well corrected to perform very tolerably with a low eye-piece, is used with an eye-piece of higher magnifying power (commonly spoken of as a ‘deeper’ one), the image may lose more in brightness and in definition, than is gained by its ampli- fication; whilst the image given by an objective of large angular aperture and very perfect corrections, shall sustain so little loss of light or of definition by ‘“‘ deep eye-piecing,” that the increase of magnifying power shall be almost all clear gain. Such an objective, therefore, though of far inferior power in itself, is practically more valuable (as giving a much greater range of power with equal efficiency) than a lens of higher power which can only be used effectively with the shallower eye-pieces. Hence the mode in which different achromatic combinations of the same power, whose performance with shallow eye-pieces is nearly the same, are respectively affected by deep eye-pieces, afford a good test of their respective merits; since any defect in the corrections is sure to be brought out by the higher amplification of the image, whilst a deficiency of aperture is manifested by the want of light. 23, An Hye-piece is sometimes furnished with achromatic microscopes, especially for micrometrie purposes, which, though composed of only two plano-convex lenses, differs essentially in its construction from the Huyghenian; the field-glass having its convex side upwards, and being so much nearer to the eye-glass, that the image is not formed above it (as at BB, Fig. 12), but below it. This eye-piece, which is known as Ramsden’s, gives a very distinct view in the central portion of the field; but, as it does not, like the Huyghenian, correct the convexity of the image formed by the objéct-glass, but rather increases it, the marginal portions of the field of view, when the centre is in focus, are quite indistinct. Hence this eye-piece cannot be recommended for ordinary use; and its chief value to the Microscopist has resulted 'Those who desire to gain more information upon this subject than they can from the above notice of it, may be referred to Mr. Varley’s investigation of the properties of the Huyghenian eye-piece, in the 51st volume of the “ Transactions of the Society of Arts;” and to the article “ Microscope,” by Mr. Ross, in the “ Penny Cyclopedia.” CONSTRUCTION OF EYE-PIECES. 85 from its adaptation to receive a divided glass micrometer, which may be fitted into the exact plane wherein the image is formed by the object-glass, so that its scale and that image are both magnified together by the lenses interposed between them and the eye. We shall hereafter see, however, that the same end may be so readily attained with the Huyghenian eye-piece (§ 46), that no practical advantage is gained by the use of that of Rams- den. It is affirmed by Mr. Ross, that if the Achromatic princi- ple were applied to the construction of Eye-pieces, the latter is the form with which the greatest perfection would be obtained. That such an adaptation might be productive of valuable results, appears from the success with which Mr. Brooke has employed a triplet objective of one-inch focus, as an eye-piece; the defini- tion obtained by it being very superior to that afforded by the ordinary Huyghenian eye-piece. 24. In the Eye-pieces of compound microscopes of older con- struction, it was customary to employ a pair of plano or double- convex lenses of longer focus, for the eye-glass, instead of a single plano-convex of shorter focus; the advantage being, that a larger and flatter field could be thereby obtained. A brighter image, a flatter field, and a greater freedom from aberration, than are afforded by any ordinary eye-piece of this kind, may be ob- tained by the substitution of a combination nearly resembling Herschel’s ‘aplanatic doublet”-—namely, a meniscus, having its concave side next the eye, and a double-convex of the form of least aberration,’ with its flattest side next the object—for the plano-convex eye-glass; and the substitution of a double-con- vex lens of the form of least aberration, with its flattest side next the object, for the plano-convex field-glass. With such an eye-piece, a field of fourteen inches in diameter (measured at the usual distance of ten inches) may be obtained perfectly flat, and equally distinct and well illuminated over every part. When such an eye-piece, however, is used in conjunction with achroma- tic objectives, it impairs the definition of their image to such a degree, that their finest qualities are altogether sacrificed. Still there are certain large transparent objects, such as transverse sections of wood, wings of insects, &c., in viewing which a large and flat field is of more importance than perfect definition; since their structure is so coarse, that there is no minute detail to be brought out. Nothing is so effective for the exhibition of these, as an eye-piece of the kind just alluded to, with an objective of about 8 or 4 inches focus; and this may either be a single lens (which, when of such low power, will perform sufficiently well for objects of this class), or a single pair of lenses forming part of a perfect achromatic combination, having its aperture somewhat contracted by a stop. 1 The “ form of least aberration” is when the radii of the two surfaces are to each other *. nee the lowest French Achromatics answer extremely well for this purpose; and the front pair of the lowest set usually made in this country (that, namely, of 2 inches focus) is sometimes made removable, so that the back pair, which also is very suitable to the class of objects mentioned above, may be employed by itself. CHAPTER II. CONSTRUCTION OF THE MICROSCOPE. 25. THE optical principles whereon the operation of the Micro- scope depends, having now been explained, we have next to consider the mechanical provisions, whereby they are brought to bear upon the different purposes which the instrument is destined to serve. And first it will be desirable to state those general principles, which have received the sanction of universal experience, in regard to the best arrangement of its constituent parts. Every complete Microscope, whether Simple or Compound, must possess, in addition to the lens or combination of lenses which affords its magnifying power, a stage whereon the object may securely rest, a concave mirror for the illumination of trans- parent objects from beneath, and a condensing-lens for the illumi- nation of opaque objects from above. I. Now in whatever mode these may be connected with each other, it is essential that the optical part and the stage should be so disposed, as either to be altogether free from tendency to vibration, or to vibrate together ; since it is obvious that any movement of one, in which the other does not partake, will be augmented to the eye of the observer in proportion to the magnifying power employed. In a badly-constructed instrument, even though placed upon a steady table resting upon the firm floor of a well- built house, when high powers are used, the object is seen to oscillate so rapidly at the slightest tremor, such as that caused by a person walking across the room, or by a carriage rolling by in the street, as to be frequently almost indistinguishable: whereas in a well-constructed microscope, scarcely any perceptible effect will be produced by even greater disturbances. II. The next requisite is a capability of accurate adjustment to every variety of focal distance, without movement of the object. It is now a principle almost universally recognized in the construction of good Microscopes, that the stage whereon the object is placed should be a fixture; the movement by which the focus is to be adjusted, being effected in the lenses or optical portion. Several reasons concur to establish this principle; of which one of the most important is, that, if the stage be made the movable part, MECHANICAL REQUIREMENTS. 87 the adjustment of the illuminating apparatus must be made afresh for every change of magnifying power; whilst if the stage be a fixture, the illumination having been“ once well adjusted, the object may be examined under a great variety of magnifying powers, without its being changed in any respect. Moreover, if the stage be the movable part, it can never have that firmness given to it which it ought to possess; for it is almost impossible to make a movable stage free from some degree of spring, so that, when the hands bear upon it in adjust- ing the position of an object, it yields in a degree, which, how- ever trifling in itself, becomes unpleasantly apparent with high powers. The mode of effecting the focal adjustment should be such as to allow free range from a minute fraction of an inch to three or four inches, with equal power of obtaining a delicate adjustment at any part. It should also be so accurate, that the optical axis of the instrument should not be in the least altered by movement in a vertical direction; so that, if an object be brought into the centre of the field with a low power, and a higher power be then substituted, it should be found in the centre of cts field, notwithstanding the great alteration in the focus. In this way much time may often be saved, by employing a low power as a finder for an object to be examined by a higher one; and when an object is being viewed by a succession of powers, little or no readjustment of its place on the stage should be required. For the Simple Microscope, in which it is seldom advantageous to use lenses of shorter focus than 1-4th inch (save where doublets are employed, § 18), a rack-and-pinion adjustment answers sufficiently well; and this is quite adequate, also, for the focal adjustment of the Compound body, when objectives of low power only are employed. But for any lenses whose focus is less than half an inch, a “fine adjustment,” by means of a screw move- ment operating either on the object-glass alone or on the entire body, is of great value; and for the highest powers it is quite indispensable. In some Microscopes, indeed, which are provided with a “fine adjustment,” the rack-and-pinion movement is dispensed with: the “coarse adjustment” being given by merely sliding the body up and down in the socket which grasps it. But this plan is objectionable, inasmuch as it involves the use of both hands in making the “coarse adjustment,” for which only one should be required ; and even then the adjustment cannot be made with nearly the same facility, as by a smooth well-cut rack. The Author’s experience, therefore, would lead him to recommend, that if one of these adjustments is to be dispensed with, it should be the “screw” or “fine” adjustment, rather than the “rack” or “coarse,” unless the instrument is to be almost exclusively employed for the examination of objects requiring high magnify- ing powers.! 1Jn the Microscopes constructed by Mr. Ladd, a chain-movement is substituted for the rack-and-pinion; and this has the advantage of being smoother and more sensitive, of being less likely to become unequal by wear, and of being easily tightened if it should 88 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MICROSCOPE. II. Scarcely less important than the preceding requisite, in the case of the Compound Microscope, though it does not add much to tle utility of the Simple, is the capability of being placed in either a vertical or a horizontal position, or at any angle with the horizon, without deranging the adjustment of its parts to each other, and without placing the eye-piece in such a position as to be inconvenient to the observer. It is certainly a matter of sur- prise, that Opticians, especially on the Continent, should have so long neglected the very simple means which are at present commonly employed in this country, of giving an inclined posi- tion to microscopes; since it is now universally acknowledged, that the vertical position is, of all that can be adopted, the very worst. An inclination of about 55° to the horizon will generally be found most convenient for unconstrained observation; and the instrument should be so constructed, as, when thus inclined, to give to the stage such an elevation above the table, that when the hands are employed at it, the arms may rest conveniently upon the table. In this manner a degree of support is attained, which gives such free play to the muscles of the hands, that movements of the greatest nicety may be executed by them; and fatigue of long-continued observation is greatly diminished. Such minutie may appear too trivial to deserve mention; but no practised microscopist will be slow to acknowledge their value. The stage must of course be provided with some means of sup- porting the object, when it is itself placed in a position so in- clined that the object would slip down unless sustained. There are some objects, however, which can only be seen in a vertical microscope, as they require to be viewed in a position nearly or entirely horizontal; such are dissections in water, urinary de- posits, saline solutions undergoing crystallization, &c. For other purposes, again, the microscope should be placed horizontally, as when the camera lucida is used for drawing or measuring. It ought, therefore, to be made capable of every such variety of position. IV. The last principle on which we shall here dwell, is simpli- city in the construction and adjustment of every part. Many in- enious mechanical devices have been invented and executed, or the purpose of overcoming difficulties which are in them- selves really trivial. A moderate amount of dexterity in the use of the hands is sufficient to render most of these superfluous; and without such dexterity, no one, even with the most complete mechanical facilities, will ever become a good microscopist. Among the conveniences of simplicity, the practised Microsco- pist will not fail to recognize the saving of time effected by being “Jose time ;” whilst its delicacy and smoothness admit of an exact adjustment being made by its means alone, even when high powers are employed. Still, as will be shown hereafter (§ 81), the use of the “fine adjustment” is by no means restricted to this pur- pose; and it cannot be advantageously dispensed with in a Microscope, which is to be used for any but the most common purposes, MECHANICAL REQUIREMENTS. 89 able quickly to set up and put away his instrument. Where a number of parts are to be screwed together before it can be brought into use, interesting objects (as well as time) dre not un- frequently lost; and the same cause will often occasion the in- strument to be left exposed to the air and dust, to its great detri- ment, because time is required to put it away; so that a slight advantage on the side of simplicity of arrangement, often causes an inferior instrument to be preferred by the working microsco- pist to a superior one. Yet there is, of course, a limit to this simplification; and no arrangement can be objected to on this score, which gives advantages in the examination of difficult ob- jects or the determination of doubtful questions, such as no simpler means can afford. The meaning of this distinction will become apparent, if it be applied to the cases of the “traversing stage” (§ 37) and the “achromatic condenser” (§ 56). For al- though the traversing stage may be considered a valuable aid in observation, as facilitating the finding of a minute object, or the examination éf the entire surface of a large one, yet it adds nothing to the clearness.of our view of either; and its place may in great degree be supplied by the fingers of a good manipulator. On the other hand, the use of the achromatic condenser not only contributes very materially, but is absolutely indispensable, to the formation of a perfect image, in the case of many objects of a difficult class; the want of it cannot be compensated by the most dexterous use of the ordinary appliances ; and consequently, although it may fairly be considered superfluous, as regards a large proportion of the purposes to which the Microscope is di- rected, whether for investigation or for display, yet as regards the particular objects just alluded to, it must be considered as no less necessary a part of the instrument than the achromatic ob- jective itself. Where expense is not an object, the Microscope should doubtless be fitted with both these valuable accessories ; where, on the other hand, the cost is so limited that only one can be afforded, that one should be selected which will make the instrument most useful for the purposes to which it is likely to be applied. (See Introduction, pp. 60, 61.) In the account now to be given, of the principal forms of Microscope readily procurable in this country, it will he the Author’s object, not so much to enumerate and describe the vari- ous patterns which the several makers of the instrument have produced, as, by selecting from among them those examples which it seems to him most desirable to make known, and by specifying the peculiar advantages which each of these presents, to guide his readers in the choice of the kind of Microscope best suited, on the one hand, to the class of investigations they may be desirous of following out, and on the other, to their pe- cuniary ability. He is anxious, however, that he should not be supposed to mark any preference for the particular instruments 90 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MICROSCOPE. he has selected, over those constructed upon the same general plan by other makers; to have enumerated them all, would ob- viously be quite incompatible with the plan of his treatise ; but he has considered it fair (save in one or two special cases) to give the preference to those makers who have worked out their own plans of construction, and have thus furnished (to say the least) the general designs, which have been adopted with more or less of modification by others. Simple Microscope. 26. Under this head, the common hand-magnifier or pocket- lens first claims our attention ; being in reality a Simple Micro- scope, although not commonly accounted as such. Although this little instrument is in every one’s hands, and is indispensable to the Naturalist,—as affording him the means of at once making such preliminary examinations as often afford him most important guidance,—yet there are comparatively few who know how to handle it to the best advantage. The chief difficulty lies in the steady fixation of it at the requisite distance from the object, es- pecially when the lens employed is of such short focus, that the slightest want of exactness in this adjustment produces evident indistinctness of the image. By carefully resting the hand which carries the glass, however, against that which carries the object, so that both, whenever they move, shall move together, the ob- server, after a little practice, will be able to employ even high powers with comparative facility. The lenses most generally serviceable for hand-magnifiers, range in focal length from two inches to half an inch; and a combination of two or three of such in the same handle, with an intervening perforated plate of tortoise-shell (which serves as a diaphragm when they are used together), will be found very useful. When such a mag- nifying power is desired, as would require a lens of a quarter of an inch focus, it is best obtained by the substitution of a “‘ Cod- dington” (§ 19) for the ordinary double-convex lens. The handle of the magnifier may be pierced with a hole at the end most dis- tant from the joint by which the lenses are attached to it; and through this may be passed a wire, which, being fitted vertically into a stand or foot, serves for the support of the magnifying lenses in a horizontal position, at any height at which it may be convenient to fix them. Such a little apparatus is a rudimentary form (so to speak) of what is commonly understood as a Simple Microscope ; the term being usually applied to those instruments in which the magnifying powers are supported otherwise than in the hand, or, in which, if the whole apparatus be supported by the hand, the lenses have a fixed bearing upon the object (§ 28). 27. Ross’s Simple Microscope.—This instrument holds an in- termediate place between the hand-magnifier and the complete Microscope; being, in fact, nothing less than a lens supported in such a manner, as to be capable of being readily fixed ina HAND-MAGNIFIER—ROSS8’S SIMPLE MICROSCOPE. 91 variety of positions suitable for dissecting and for other manipu- lations. It consists of a circular brass foot, wherein is screwed a short tubular pillar (Fig. 14), whichis “sprung” at its upper end, so as to grasp a second tube, also “sprung,” by the drawing out of which the pillar may be elongated to about three inches. This carries at its upper end a jointed socket, through which a square bar about 33 inches long slides rather stiffly ; and one end. of this bar carries another joint, to which is attached a ring for holding the lenses. By lengthening or shortening the pillar, by varying the angle which the square bar makes with its summit, and by sliding that bar through its socket, almost any position and elevation may be given to the lens, that can be required for the purposes to which it may be most usefully applied; care being taken in all in- stances, that the ring which carries the lens should (by means of its joint) be placed horizon- tally. At A is seen the position which adapts it best for picking out mi- nute shells or for other si- milar manipulations; the sand or dredgings to be examined being spread upon a piece of black paper, and raised upon a book, a box, or some other support, to such a height, that when the lens is adjusted thereto, the eye may be applied to it continuously without unnecessary fatigue. It will be found advantage- ous that the foot of the microscope should not stand upon the paper over which the objects are spread, as it is de- sirable to shake this from’ time to time, in order to bring a fresh portion of the matters to be ex- amined into view; and, generally speaking, it will be found convenient ; ; to place iton the opposite Ross’s Simple Microscope. side of the object, rather than on the same side with the ob- Fria. 14, fi ——- 92 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MICROSCOPE. server, At B is shown the positionin which it may be most con- veniently set, for the dissection of objects contained in a plate or trough, the sides of which, being higher than the lens, would prevent the use of any magnifier mounted on a horizontal arm. The powers usually supplied with this instrument, are one lens of an inch focus, and a second of either half or a quarter of an inch. By unscrewing the pillar, the whole is made to pack into a small flat case, the extreme portability of which is a great re- commendation. Although the uses of this little instrument are greatly limited by its want of stage, mirror, &c., yet for the class of purposes to which it 2s suited, it has advantages over perhaps every other form that has been devised. 28. Gairdner’s Simple Microscope.—This little instrument, dis- tinguished like the preceding for its simplicity and portability, is adapted to quite a different class of purposes; namely, the examination of minute transparent objects, especially those con- tained in fluid, such as Animaleules, Desmidiew and Diatomacee, Urinary deposits, &c. It consists (Fig. 15) of a Wollaston’s doublet (§ 18), supported upon a handle, with which is also con- nected an elastic slip of brass, carrying a ring which surrounds the projecting centre of the under side of the doublet; this ring is made to approach nearer to, or to recede further from, the doublet, by means of a milled-headed screw which passes through the stem that supports the latter, and bears upon the slip of brass that carries'the former; and to the side of it which is furthest from the doublet, a disk of very thin glass is cemented. In using this little instrument, a minute drop of the liquid to be examined is to be placed on the under side of the thin | glass disk,—that is, on the side away from i@ the doublet,—and it is to be covered by another disk, which will be drawn to the fixed disk, and supported in its place by the capillary attraction of the fluid for both. The instrument is then to be so held, that the eye, when applied to the doublet, looks at the light through the film of liquid; and when the focal adjustment is made by means of the milled head, any particles this may contain, of a size to be brought into view by the magnifying power employed, will be distinctly discerned. The instrument is usually constructed with but a single power, adapted to the class of objects for which it is to be employed; thus for the pur- poses of the botanical or zoological, collector, a power of from 70 to 100 diameters is sufficient; whilst for the examination of uri- nary deposits, a power of 200 or more is desirable. It would not Fra. 15. Gairdner’s Simple Microscope. GAIRDNER’S AND FIELD’S SIMPLE MICROSCOPES. 93 be difficult so to modify it, however, by making the doublet to screw into a socket, instead of fixing it on the stem, that one power might be substituted for another on the same instrument; and the adjusting screw might then perhaps be dispensed with, since the focal adjustment might probably be made sufficiently well, by turning round the doublet itself in its screwed socket. The object-holder, too, might be so constructed as to receive a greater variety of objects, and even to hold preparations mounted on slips of glass; which would often be a matter of great con- venience for class demonstration. All this, however, would add to the complexity and the cost of the instrument; the simplicity and low price of which at present constitute its chief reeommen- dation. Though not suited for the higher purposes of a Micro- scope (the view of any object afforded by a doublet magnifying 100 or 200 diameters, being far inferior to that presented by only a tolerable achromatic), yet there is a certain class of observations for which it is particularly convenient,—those, namely, which only require a recognition of known forms. Thus, the collector of Diatomacee, Animalcules, &c., may by its means at once test the general value of the sample he has taken up, and may decide whether to throw it away as worthless, or to reserve it for more minute examination. And the Medical practitioner who is familiar with the aspect of Urinary deposits, may, by this little instrument (which he can carry in his waistcoat-pocket), discrimi- nate on the spot the nature of almost any sediment whose charac- ter he may wish to know, without being obliged to have recourse to a more elaborate apparatus.} 29. Field’s Simple Microscope.—The general purposes of a sim- ple Microscope are satisfactorily answered by the instrument, which has recently gained the premium awarded by the Council of the Society of Arts, and which is capable of being very effec- tively used in the examination of most of the objects for which such an instrument is suited. It consists (Fig. 16) of a tubular stem, about five inches high, the lower end of which screws firmly into the lid of the box wherein the instrument is packed when not in use. To the upper end of this stem, the stage is firmly fixed; while the lower ‘end carries a concave murror. Within the tubular stem is a round pillar, having a rack cut into it, against which a pinion works that is turned by a milled head; and the upper part of this pillar carries a horizontal arm which bears the lenses; so that, by turning the milled head, the arm may be raised or lowered, and the requisite focal adjustment ob- tained. Three magnifiers are supplied with this instrument; and by using them either separately or in combination (the lens of shortest focus being placed at the bottom, whenever two, or all three, are used together), a considerable range of powers, ! This Microscope, the invention of Dr. William Gairdner, of Edinburgh, is made by Mr. Bryson, optician, of that city. : 94 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MICROSCOPE. from about five to forty diameters, is obtained. The stage is perforated with a hole at each corner; into any one of which may be fitted a condensing lens for opaque objects (§ 64), or a pair of stage-forceps (§ 66). An aquatic-box for the ex- amination of objects in water (§ 68) is also sup- plied.’ This instrument is peculiarly adapted for educational purposes ;? being fitted in every particular for the ex- amination of botanical specimens, small insects or parts of insects, water flies, the larger animal- cules, and other such objects as young people may readily collect and prepare for themselves; and such as_ have trained themselves in Field’s Simple Microscope. the application of it to the study of Nature, are well prepared for the advantageous use of the Compound Microscope. But it also affords to the scientific inquirer all that is.essential to the pursuit of such investigations, as are best followed out by the concurrent em- ployment of a Simple and a Compound Microscope, the former being most fitted for the preparation, and the latter for the examination, of many kinds of objects;?—and it may be easily adapted to the purposes of dissection, by placing it between arm- rests (§ 104), or blocks of wood, or books piled one on another, so as to give a support for the hand on either side, at or near the level of the stage. 30. Quekett’s Dissecting Mieroscope.—To the scientifie investi- gator, however, it is generally more convenient to have a larger stage than the preceding instrument affords; and in this respect an arrangement devised by Mr. Quekett (Fig. 17) will be found extremely convenient. The stage, which constitutes the princi- pal part of the apparatus, is a plate of brass (bronzed) nearly six inches square, screwed to a piece of mahogany of the same size and about éths of an inch thick; underneath this a folding flap Fia. 16, ' The price of the instrument, with all these appurtenances, packed in a neat ma- hogany box, is only half a guinea ; and the maker, Mr. G. Field, of Birmingham, is bound by his agreement with the Society of Arts to keep it always in stock. See also Say 2 See Introduction, pp. 60, 61. 5 See Introduction, p. 63. QUEKETT’S DISSECTING MICROSCOPE. 95 four inches broad is attached by hinges on each side; and the two flaps are so shaped, that, when closed together, one lies closely upon the other, as shown in Fig. 17,8. These flaps, when opened, and kept asunder by a brass bar, as shown in Fig. 17, 4, give a firm support to the stage at a convenient height; Fig. 17. ear IY —— SS ]]]S== Quekett’s Dissecting Microscope. and the bar also carries a socket, into which the stem of the mirror-frame is inserted. At the back of the stage-plate is a round hole, through which a tubular stem slides vertically, that carries at its summit the horizorital arm for the magnifying pow- ers; this stem may or may not be furnished with a rack-and- pinion movement; but the author’s experience leads him strongly to recommend that it should be provided with this means of making the focal adjustment; since the sliding action, indepen- dently of the greater trouble it always involves, is apt to become uneven and difficult, especially if the surface of the stem should have become roughened by the corrosion of sea-water, or by the action of acids, salines, &., used as reagents. The same frame which carries the mirror, is also made to carry a lens which serves as a condenser for opaque objects; its stem being then fitted into $6 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MICROSCOPE. a hole in the stage, at one side, or in front of, its central perfora- tion. The instrument is usually furnished with three magnifiers, namely, an inch and half-inch ordinary lenses, and a quarter-inch Coddington (§ 19); and these will be found to be the powers most useful for the purposes to which this instrument is specially adapted. The lenses, mirror, condenser, cross-bar, vertical stem, and milled head, all fit into hollows cut for their reception on the under side of the stage, and are then covered and kept in place by the side flaps; so that, when packed together, and the flaps kept down by an elastic band, as shown in Fig. 17, B, the instrument is extremely portable, furnishing (so to speak) a case for itself. It may be easily made to serve as a Compound micro- scope, by means of an additional stem and horizontal arm, car- rying a light “body.” The principal disadvantages of this very ingenious and otherwise most convenient arrangement, are that it must be always used with the light zn front of the observer, or nearly so, since the side-flaps interfere with the access of side- light to the mirror; and that the obstruction of the side-flaps also prevents the hands from having that ready access to the mirror, which is convenient in making its adjustments. These incon- veniences, however, are trifling, when compared with the great facilities afforded for scientific investigation by the size and firm- ness of the stage; and the author can confidently recommend the instrument for all such purposes, from much personal experi- ence of its utility. Compound Microscope. The various forms of Compound Microscope may be grouped with tolerable definiteness into two principal classes; one con- sisting of those instruments, whose size and general plan of con- struction adapt them only for the ordinary methods of observa- tion; whilst the other includes those which are suited to carry the various accessories, whose use enables the observer not only to work with more facility and certainty, but, in some instances, to gain information respecting the object of his examination, which he could not obtain without them. It is true that some of the most important of these accessories may be applied to the smaller and lighter kind of Microscopes; but when it is desired to render the instrument complete by the addition of them, it is far preferable to adopt one of those larger and more substantial patterns, which has been devised with express reference to their most advantageous and most convenient employment. In nearly all the instruments now to be described, the same basis of sup- port is adopted, namely, a triangular “foot,” from which arise two uprights ; and between these the microscope itself is swung, in such a manner that the weight of its different parts may be as nearly as possible balanced above and below the centres of sus- pension, in all the ordinary positions of the instrument. This double support was first introduced by Mr. George Jackson, who FIELD’S EDUCATIONAL MICROSCOPE. 97 substituted two pillars (a form which Messrs. Smith and Beck still retain in their Large Compound Microscope, Fig. 29) for the single pillar connected with the microscope itself by a “‘ cra- dle-joint” (as in Fig. 20) which was previously in use; but in place of pillars screwed into the tripod base, a pair of flattened uprights, cast in one piece with it, is now generally adopted, with a view both to greater solidity and to facility of construc- tion. Messrs. Powell and Lealand, it will be observed, adopt a tripod support of a different kind (Fig. 28), still, however, carry- ing out the same fundamental principle, of swinging the micro- scope itself between two centres. Two different modes of giving support and motion to the “body” will be found to prevail. One consists in its attachment at its base to the transverse “arm,” which is borne on the summit of the movable stem, whose rack is acted on by the pinion of the milled head, as in Figs. 18, 27, 28; whilst in the other, the body is supported along a great part of its length by means of a solid “limb,” to which is attached the pinion that acts on a rack fixed to the body itself, as in Figs. 21, 22, and 29. The former method has the advantage of ena- bling the body to be turned aside by the rotation of the trans- verse arm upon the summit of the stem,—a movement which is often convenient, both as leaving the stage clear for dissection, &e., and as enabling the objectives to be more readily exchanged ; but it is subject to the disadvantage, that unless the transverse arm and the body are constructed with great solidity, the absence of support along the length of the latter leaves it subject to vi- bration, which may become unpleasantly apparent when high powers are used, giving a dancing motion to the objects. With a view of preventing this vibration, Messrs. Powell and Lealand connect the top of the “body” with the back of the transverse arm, by a pair of oblique “stays” (Fig. 28). The second method of support is decidedly superior in steadiness, a perfect freedom from tremor being obtained with less solidity, and therefore with less cumbrousness ; the mode in which the rack is applied, more- over, in the microscopes of Messrs. Smith and Beck (most of which are constructed upon this plan) gives to it a peculiar smoothness and easiness of working; but the traversing move- ment of the body is sacrificed. Although some attach considera- ble importance to this movement, the author’s experience of instruments constructed upon both plans, leads him to give a preference to the second. 31. Field’s Compound Microscope.—The first of the simpler forms which we shall more particularly describe, is that to which the medal of the Society of Arts has been recently awarded, not. as a testimony to the perfection of its construction, but as mark- ing the highest degree of excellence among the instruments sent in competition, that seemed consistent with the cheapness’ which 1 The, price of this instrument, complete, with two eye-pieces and two achromatic objectives giving a range of power from about 25 to 200 diameters, condenser on a 98 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MICROSCOPE. was the fundamental requirement (see Introduction, p. 61). The tripod foot (Fig. 18), with its pair of uprights, is of cast iron; and affords a very firm and steady basis of support. The centres of suspension by which the microscope is swung between these up- Fia. 18. rights, are attached to the hol- low pillar that bears all the other parts. Just above them, when the instrument is in a vertical position, is a milled head on either side, which acts on a rack cut into the stem that rises from the pillar, and carries the body on a transverse arm, thus giving the “coarse” adjustment for focal distance; whilst the “fine” adjustment is given by another milled head (seen edgeways in the figure) in the transverse arm, which turns a screw whose extremity acts upon a lever that produces a slight change in the distance between the object-glass and the object, by elevating or de- pressing a tube that carries BIEIE SOUEMIEE HEESEESP Es the former,—this tube being so fitted to the lower end of the body as to slide freely within it, and being pressed downwards by a spring, whilst it is raised up- wards by the lever-action just named. The additional advantage is gained by this arrangement (which is the one adopted with some modification by most Microscope makers), namely, that if the object-glass should be carelessly forced down so as to press upon the object, the yielding of the spring-tube prevents any serious injury to the one, and to a certain extent protects the other. The stage, which is firmly attached to the pillar, is fur- nished on its upper surface with a movable brass ledge, against which the object rests when the stage is inclined in any degree to the horizon; this ledge should slide smoothly and easily from the back to the front of the stage, but should have at the same time sufficient hold upon it to retain its position and to support ° the object, at whatever point it may be left. At a little distance beneath the stage, there is attached to it a “diaphragm plate,” perforated with holes of various sizes for the regulation of the quantity of light admitted to transparent objects (§ 55), and also affording, in one of its positions, a dark background, which is separate stand, stage-forceps, and live-box, in a mahogany case, is only three guineas; and the maker, Mr. G. Field, of Birmingham, is bound by his agreement with the Society of Arts to keep it always in stock, so as to supply any purchaser at once. HIGHLEY’S HOSPITAL MICROSCOPE. 99 useful when opaque objects are being viewed. The stage is per- forated at one of its front corners with a hole, into which fits a pair of stage-forceps (§ 66). The mirror, which is concave on one side and plane on the other, is attached, not to the pillar, but to a tube which slides upon it, so that its distance from the under side of the stage may be increased or diminished. The con- denser for opaque objects is mounted on a separate stand (§ 64). The simplicity of the constrtiction of this Microscope, and the facility with which all those adjustments may be made that are required for the purposes which it is intended to fulfil, should constitute, with its low price, a great recommendation to those who value a Microscope rather as a means of interesting recrea- tion for themselves, or of cultivating a taste for the study of na- ture and a habit of correct observation in the yeung, than as an instrument of scientific research. It is not, of course, to be ex- pected that it should bear comparison, in regard either to the mechanical finish of its workmanship, or to the perfection of its optical effects, with Micro- scopes of many times its cost; but it is infinitely superior to the best Microscope ever con- structed on the old (non-achro- matic) plan; and it is greatly to be preferred in its mecha- nical arrangements to any of the earlier achromatic micro- scopes, which it at least equals in optical performance. 82. Highley’s Hospital Micro- scope.—The scale of this in- strument is somewhat larger than that of the preceding, and its workmanship more finished and substantial. The tripod stand, the stage and its fittings, and the mirror, al- most exactly resemble those first described; but the body, which is longer, is supported in a different manner. The pillar to which the stage and the mirror are attached, is pro- longed upwards, and then forms a kind of “limb,” to which is affixed a tube slit down in front; and within this tube the “body” slides up and down, with sufficient freedom to allow of being easily moved, yet with sufficient stiffness to remain firm in any position in which it may be left. In the sim- ple form of this instrument here delineated, the sliding action Fig. 19. Highley’s Hospital Microscope. 100 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MICRCGSCOPE. affords the only means of making the “coarse” adjustment (§ 25, II); but a rack-and-pinion movement may be introduced ata trifling additional cost. The “fine” adjustment is made bya milled head in front of the lower end of the body, which acts directly upon a tube sliding within it that carries the objectives, This instrument is particularly adapted, by the roominess of its stage, for the examination of pathological specimens; and, when the body is provided with a rack movement, it forms an unex- ceptionable microscope for general purposes, and may even be fur- nished with a movable stage, achromatic condenser, polarizing apparatus, &c.! 33. Nachet’s Microscope-—Until a comparatively recent period, all save the most elaborate and expensive forms of Compound Microscope constructed by Continental opticians, were adapted for use in the vertical position only. M. Nachet, however, has now so modified his ordinary pattern, that the instrument may be inclined (like the preceding) at any angle; and he has thus rendered it a very convenient, as well asa cheap and portable Mi- croscope. The basis consists of a somewhat oval foot, with a single pillar rising from a little behind its centre; and at the top of this pillar is a “cradle-joint,” which supports the stage and the upright steth that carries the body. The transverse arm, how- ever, is attached, not directly to the summit of this stem, but to a tube which slides over it; and this tube can be raised or lowered by turning the milled head at its summit (which acts upon a screw that enters the stem), whereby a “fine” adjustment is obtained, that acts through the transverse arm upon the body which it carries. The “coarse” adjustment is effected, as in the preceding case, by sliding the body through an outer tube which grasps it; the latter being fixed into the transverse arm. The mode in which the object issupported upon the stage, when this is inclined, is very simple and ingenious, and is in some repects preferable to the sliding-ledge generally used by English makers. Near each side of the stage is seen a somewhat elastic strip or tongue of sheet brass, the front extremity of which is free, but which is attached at its hinder end to a pin that passes through a hole in the stage, in which it works very easily. This pin is prolonged for about #ths inch beneath the stage, and then termi- nates in a broad flat head; and it is surrounded by a slender spiral spring, which, bearing at its two ends against the under side of the stage and the head of the pin, tends to depress the latter, and thus to bring the brass tongue into close apposition with the stage when nothing intervenes, and to bind down any- thing that may be placed between them. In making use of this little apparatus, 1t is most convenient to employ both hands, in such a manner that the thumb and forefinger of each shall ' The cost of this instrument essentially depends npon the number and magnifying power of the objectives supplied with it; it is usually provided, however, with a 1-inch and }-inch; and is then sold (without the rack movement) at £6 10s. This sum, how- ever, does not include either a case or any accessory apparatus. NACHET’S MICROSCOPE. 101 hold one end of the slip of glass whereon is placed the object under examination, whilst one of the other fingers of each hand is used to push up the head at the end of the pin, so as to lift the tongue from the stage; the slip of glass can then be moved from side to side, or up and down, with the most perfect free- dom, and may be firmly se- cured at any point by ceasing to press upon the heads of the pins, which will then be forced down by the springs, so as to bring the tongues to bear on the slip of glass. When the microscope is used in a vertical position, for the examination of urinary de- posits, &c., no means of fix- ing the object being requir- ed, it is convenient to turn the tongues backwards, so as not to occupy any part of the stage. The advantages of this arrangement are the perfect freedom with which the slip of glass can be moved > under the objective, either in a finding a minute object, or Nachet’s Compound Microscope. in examining the surface of a larger one; and the facility and exactness with which it is retained at any point, at which it may be desired to fix it. The disadvantages are, the necessity of using both hands to move the object; and the interference of the tongues with the movement of the object from side to side, when it is large enough to require a considerable range; on which last account the plan is unsuited to the use of an aquatic box. The stage is furnished on its under surface witha diaphragm plate, not mounted as a wheel, but sliding in a straight line, which is a less convenient arrangement ; and to its lower side is also attached a stem that carries the mirror, the distance of which from the stage is not capable of variation. This instrument is distinguished by its simplicity and cheapness, and by its adapta- tion to many of the wants of the scientific inquirer.'. One of its chief disadvantages is the small size (especially the narrowness) of its stage, which cramps the operations of the observer; and hence it will not be found nearly so convenient to the young microscopist, as the equally simple patterns in common use in 1 With three objectives and three eye-pieces, giving a range of magnifying powers from about 50 to about 500 diameters, it is sold in Paris for 190 francs. Fic. 20. 102 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MICROSCOPE. this country. Those, however, who are carrying on researches upon objects too minute to make this objection felt (such, for example, as urinary deposits), and who need high magnifying powers, without requiring these to possess the greatest attainable perfection, will find this Microscope extremely well suited to their wants. Another instrument constructed by M. Nachet upon the same general plan, but upon a larger scale, is capable of being fitted with Achromatic condenser, Polarizing apparatus, Micrometer eye-piece, Stage movements, &c.; in the arrange- ment of which accessories, much skilful contrivance is shown. The Binocular Microscope of the Fig. 21. same ingenious Optician will be described further on (§ 40). 34. Smith and Beck's Stu- dent’s Microscope.—Of the pat- terns yet devised for a micro- scope of simple construction, which shall yet be capable of answering every essential pur- pose whether of display or of investigation, that of Messrs, Smith and Beck appears to the Author to be (to say the least) among the best; and he recommends it with the more confidence, since he has for many years employed one of these Microscopes as his own working instrument. There is nothing distinctive in the tripod support, or in the mode in which the microscope itself is suspended between the up- rights. But the “body” rests for a great part of its length upon a “limb” of solid brass, ploughed into a groove for the reception of the rack which is attached to the body; this groove being of such a form, that the rack is firmly held in it, whilst it slides smoothly through it. The great advan- tage of this method of construction over any other in which the rack-and-pinion movement is made to act directly on the body, is that it renders impossible any of that tevdst which tends to throw the object more or less completely out of the field, and secures that exact centering which is essential to the optical perfection of the instrament. The upper end of the body is furnished with a “draw tube,” by which its length can be increased; and one side Smith and Beck’s Student’s Microscope. SMITH AND BECK’S STUDENT’S MICROSCOPE. 103 of this is graduated to inches and tenths. The advantages of' this arrangement will be explained hereafter (§ 48). The “fine” ad- justment is effected by means of a milled head, situated just be- hind the base of the stem that bears the limb; this acts on a screw, the turning of which (by a contrivance that need not be described in detail) depresses the stem with the limb and body attached to it, so as to bring the objective nearer to .the object ; whilst if the pressure of the screw be withdrawn, by turning the milled head in the opposite direction, the tubular stem (with the limb and body) is carried upwards by a spiral spring in its in- terior, thus increasing the distance of the objective from the ob- ject. This adjustment is remarkable for its sensitiveness, and for its freedom from any displacing action upon theimage. The only other peculiarity that need be noticed in this instrument, is the mode in which the object is borne upon the stage ; for, in- stead of resting against a ledge, it lies upon a kind of fork, which slides in grooves ploughed out of the stage, and which moves with such facility, that the pressure of a single finger upon’ one of the upright pins at the back of the fork 1s sufficient to push it in either direction. At the extremity of one of the prongs of this fork, is a “spring clip” for securing the object by a gentle pressure, which is particularly useful when the micro- scope is placed in a horizontal position for drawing with the camera lucida (§ 49), the stage being then vertical. And at the extremity of the other prong is a hole for the insertion of the pin of the stage-forceps, which thus gains the advantage of the sliding movement of the fork, in addition to its own actions. This in- strument can easily be made to receive the addition of an achro- matic condenser and of a polarizing apparatus; it may also be fitted with a traversing stage, but there is scarcely sufficient room for its working, to render such an addition worth its cost.’ 35. Smithand Beck's Dissecting Microscope.—A modification of the preceding pattern has been made for the special purpose of carrying on dissections under the Compound Microscope, without any interference, however, with the use of the instrument for all ordinary purposes. The general plan of the instrument (Fig. 22), as will be at once apparent, is essentially the same as that of the 1 No working Physiologist or Naturalist can reguire, in the Author’s opinion, a better instrument than the above ; unless he be directing his attention to some particular class of objects, which need the very highest microscopic refinements for their elucidation. The cost of the instrument, fitted with two eye-pieces, condenser for opaque objects, aquatic box, and stage-forceps, is (with case) about £7; the cost of the objectives de- pends upon their magnifying power and upon their angular aperture. Those most serviceable for ordinary purposes are the 14 inch, 3 inch, 4, inch, and 4 inch, whose respective prices are £3, and 3,5, and 6 guineas; the first and third, or the second and fourth, of these may be selected in the first instance, and the others added at any time ; the addition of the 4 inch (which the unpractised microscopist is scarcely likely to employ to advantage, and which is ‘only useful for a very limited set of purposes) may be postponed until it is really needed and can be effectually employed. Morecan be seen of most objects by the proper management of such a } inch as Messrs. 8. and B. now supply, than could have been made out by the $ of a few years back. These opticians are now constructing a new pattern of Student’s Microscope, complete in itself, with two good powers, which will be well adapted to the most important uses of 104 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MICROSCOPE. Student’s Microscope; but the stage is much longer from back to front, so as to give more room; and from the back of it rises a strong curved limb for the support of the body, which is made to slide upon it, as in the previous case, by a rack-and-pinion move- ment. A second milled head is seen above that by which the focal adjustment is made; and this acts by means of a rack upon the draw-tube, which it brings out or shuts in, without the necessity of holding the body with the other hand,—a movement which will be found of very great advantage, when the “erecting Fie. 22. - eye-piece” (§ 44) is employed for varying the magnifying power. The chief use of this erecting eye-piece, which screws into the lower end of the draw-tube (Fig. 32), in the Dissecting Microscope, is to erect the image (as its designa- tion implies), and thus to facili- tate the employment of dissect- ing instruments upon an object under inspection, the selection of minute shells, &e., or other manipulations, which cannot be so conveniently carried on, save after long practice, when the object is inverted. Asthe “fine” adjustment cannot, in this pattern, be applied to the “limb,” it is attached (if re- quired) to the lower end of the body itself, as in Messrs. Smith and Beck’s larger Microscope (Fig. 29); but for the purposes to which such an instrument’ as this is usually applied, the fine adjustment is seldom need- ed, the rack-movement being sufficiently exact and sensitive to furnish all that is needed for low and medium powers. the Physiologist and Medical Practitioner, without exceeding ten pounds in price. To those, however, who, though obliged to limit their first outlay, contemplate making sub- sequent additions, the Author would strongly recommend the choice of the instrument described in the text, as one on which such additional expenditure may be more pro- fitably bestowed. Since the above were written, Messrs. Smith and Beck have brought out the “ Educational Microscope” there alluded to; and after a careful examination of it, the Author can strongly recommend it as admirably adapted to the purposes for which it is intended. It is fitted with two eyepieces and two objectives, giving a range of powers from 55 to 350 diameters; and may also be furnished with an extra low power for large opaque objects, at a small additional cost. For the additional sum of £5, a Lie- berkthn, Parabolic Hluminator, Polarizing Apparatus, Camera Lucida Prism, Aquatic Box, and Zoophyte Trough are supplied; all fitted into the saine very portable case, and rendering the instrament extremely complete. WARINGTON’S UNIVERSAL MICROSCOPE. 105 When this addition is made, however, the instrument is adapted to any kind of work to which the preceding can be applied ; it can receive the same fittings; and in consequence of the larger dimensions of the stage, a traversing movement may be readily added to it. This Microscope may thus be rendered a very com- plete instrument; but it will scarcely be so convenient in use, as the instruments which are specially planned for a greater range of adaptations; and the particular advantage it possesses, is for the purpose indicated by its designation. 36. Warington’s Universal Microscope-—A new set of adapta- tions for special purposes, called for by new requirements, has been recently devised by Mr. Warington ; who, by different com- binations of the same very simple materials, has produced an in- strument which may be used in four different modes, and which may fairly, therefore, be designated a “ universal’ microscope. Mr. Warington’s original object was to provide an arrangement, whereby the Compound Microscope should be brought to bear upon living objects in an Aquarium, when these might be either in contact with one of the glass sides, or be not far removed from it. This he accomplished by making use of the body of a Stu- dent’s microscope (§ 34), with the grooved limb in which it slides, and attaching the latter by a strong cradle-joint to a tubular stem, which could be fixed at any height upon the edge of the table that. supports the Aqua- rium, by means of a clamp with Fra. 28. a binding screw. Subsequently Mr. W. dispensed with the rack ; attaching the cradlejoint at the top of the tubular stem to an outer tube, within which the sliding of the body acts as a “coarse” adjustment; and pro- viding a “fine” adjustment (by ‘an ingenious plan of his own) at the object end of the body itself. To the Author, how- ever, it has seemed far more convenient to retain the rack; and this he has combined with the sliding tube, thus obtaining ‘Warington’s Universal Microscope, as arranged great facility of adjustment with for viewing objects in au Aquarium. no perceptible “twist; and the arrangement of the apparatus, with this modification, is shown in Fig. 23. If the rack be well cut, there will be no oc- casion for a “fine” adjustment; since the purposes to which this arrangement is adapted, only require low or moderate powers. When the instrument is set up in the above position, the body may be moved like a swivel from side to side, and it may be inclined downwards at any degree of obliquity; but its most 106 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MICROSCOPE. suitable position will generally be the horizontal, with its axis Fig. 24, Wartngton’s Universal Microscope, as arranged for Dis- section in a large trough. (N.B.—By drawing the stem a through the elamp, the body may be shifted to sucha dis- tance fromthe wooden hase, that the latter need not interfere with the dissecting trough.) Fig. 25. . Warington’s Universal Microscope, arranged for ordinary use. 3 Sgih tas : LX 8 directed at right angles to the flat side of the Aquarium. It is obvi- ous that the very same instrument, turned from the horizontal into the vertical position, by at- taching the clamp (as in Fig. 24) to the edge ofa wooden strutt rising vertically from a hori- zontal slab, instead of to the edge of a hori- zontal table, becomes extremely well suited for examining objects which are in course of dissection in a trough too large to be con- veniently transferred to the stage of the micro- scope, for looking over minute shells spread out on a sheet of paper, and for other purposes for which a special form of dissecting microscope has been devised by Messrs. Powell and Lea- land. But again, by turning up the L shaped support constructed for the last-named purpose, so that it shall rest (as it were) on two legs like the Greek 2, and then clamping the stem that carries the body to its highest edge, the instru- ment acquires a position very suitable for ordi- nary microscope work ; and nothing is wanted to adapt it to this, save . the addition of a stage and a mirror, each of which may be so con- structed as to fit into a WARINGTON’S UNIVERSAL MICROSCOPE. 107 brass socket let into the wooden support, thus completing the Microscope in the form represented in Fig. 25. This is not the last of the adaptations of which the instrument is capable; for the wooden support remaining at the same inclination, the body may be brought to the perpendicular, by shifting its stem in the clamp and by altering its angle at the cradlejoint; whilst a horizontal po- sition may be given to the stage, by fitting it into another socket (Fig. 26); in this arrangement, Fria 96" moreover, the stage acquires an ree increase of firmness, from the bearing of a plate that projects at right angles from its under surface, upon the inclined face of the wooden support. Thusa dissecting microscope is form- ed, which has many of the ad- vantages of that of Messrs. Smith and Beck; being subject, however, to the important drawback, that the mirror can- not be so placed as to reflect the light upwards through the axis of the microscope. (A means of remedying this, how- ever, might perhaps be con- trived without much difficulty or cost.) On the left side of the slanting support, at a short distance above the stage, is a : hole into which may be fitted Warington’s Universal Microscope, arranged for either the stem of a condens- se ae ing lens for opaque objects, or the stem of the stage-forceps ; either or both of which may also be fitted into holes in the front corners of the stage. The stage is provided with a sliding ledge for the support of objects in an inclined position; and it might also be furnished, if required, with a diaphragm plate. One of the chief merits of the instrument, however, being lightness and portability, it would not be desirable to encumber it with many accessories. or convenience of packing, the shorter portion of the 1 piece may be connected with the longer by strong pins fitted into sockets, instead of being permanently fixed, so that the two can be readily disconnected and one part laid flat upon the other; and the whole apparatus will then lie within a very small compass.. The distinctive peculiarity of this instrument consists in the extreme simplicity of the means by which a variety of useful ends are obtained. It is scarcely one that should be re- commended to the beginner ; since it is in several respects not so well adapted for ordinary work, as the forms already described. But itis a most valuable addition to the Microscopic apparatus of 108 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MICROSCOPE. the Naturalist ; and may be constructed at so trifling an expense, to work with any objectives he already may possess, that a con- siderable’demand may be anticipated for it.! 37. We now pass to an entirely different class of instruments, —those of which the aim is, not simplicity but perfection ; not the production of the best effect with limited means, but the at- tainment of everything that the Microscope can accomplish, with- out regard to cost or complexity. This object has been certainly carried out by the Opticians of our own country, niuch more com- pletely than by those of the Continent; and it seems but fair to- wards the three principal London makers, by whose labors the present admirable results have been attained, that the pattern finally adopted by each should be here delineated and described. Without any invidious preference, the first place may fairly be 7 assigned to the Large Compound Microscope of Mr. Ross; not only as being the one which was first brought (in all essen- tial features at least) to its present form, but also because it is that which contains the greatest number of provisions for investi- gating objects in a variety of different modes. The general plan of Mr. Ross’s Mi- croscope will be seen to be essentially the same with that which has been followed by Mr. Fieldin the simple form of this instru- ment first described ‘(§ 31), as well as by many other makers; but it is carried out with the greatest at- tention to solidity of construction, in those parts especially which are most liable to tremor; and we are informed by Mr. Ross, that every part has been tested by the “inverted pendulum” 4 eM _ Ross’s Large Compound Microscope. 'This instrument has been made for Mr. Warington and for the Author by Mr. Salmon, 100 Fenchurch Street; who supplies it, on either plan, without objectives or case, but with condenser and stage-forceps, for 3 guineas. ROSS’S LARGE COMPOUND MICROSCOPE. 109 (an instrument contrived to indicate otherwise insensible vibra- tions), and either strengthened or reduced as might be found necessary, so as to obtain an equality of vibration between the stage and the optical part, which will prevent any percepti- ble tremor in the image. The “coarse” adjustment 1s made by the large milled head situated just behind the summit of the up- rights, which turns a pinion working into arack cut on the back of a very strong flattened stem, that carries the transverse arm at its summit; a second milled head (which is here concealed by the stage fittings) is attached to the other end of the axis of the pinion (as in Fig. 18), so as to be worked with the left hand. The “‘ fine” adjustment is effected by the milled head on the transverse arm just behind the base of the “body;” this acts upon the “nose” or tube projecting below the arm, wherein the objectives are screwed. The other milled head seen at the summit of the stem, serves to secure the transverse arm to this, and may be tightened or slackened at pleasure, so as to regulate the travers- ing movement of the arm; this movement is only allowed to take place in one direction, namely, towards the right side, being checked in the opposite by a “stop,” which secures the coinci- dence of the axis of the body with the centre of the stage and with the axis of the illuminating apparatus beneath it. It is in the movements of the stage, that the greatest contrivance is shown ; these are three, namely, a traversing movement from side to side, a traversing movement from before backwards, and a rotatory movement. The traversing movements, which allow the platform carrying the object to be shifted about an inch in each direction, are effected by the two milled heads situated at the right of the stage; and these are placed side by side, in such a position that one may be conveniently acted on by the fore- finger, and the other by the middle finger, the thumb being readily passed from one to the other. The traversing portion of the stage carries the platform whereon the object is ]aid, which has a ledge at the back for it to rest against; and this platform has a sliding movement of its own, from before backwards, by which the object is first brought near to the axis of the micro- scope, its perfect adjustment being then obtained by the traversing movement. To this platform, and to the traversing slides which carry it, ‘a rotatory movement is imparted by a milled head, placed underneath the stage on the left hand side ; for this milled head turns a pinion which works against the circular rack (seen in the figure) whereby the whole apparatus above is carried round about a third of a revolution, without in the least disturbing the place of the object,.or removing it from the field of the micro- scope. This rotatory movement is useful for two purposes ; first, in the examination of very delicate objects by oblique lights, in order that, without disturbing the illuminating apparatus, the effect of the light and shadow may be seen in every direction, whereby important additional information is often gained; and, 110 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MICROSCOPE. secondly, in the examination of objects under polarized light, a class of appearances being produced by the rotation of the object between the prisms, which is not developed by the rotation of either of the prisms themselves. Below the stage, and in front of the stem that carries the mirror, is a dovetail sliding bar, which is moved up and down by the milled head shown at its side ; this sliding bar carries what is termed by Mr. Ross the “secondary stage” (omitted in the figure for the sake of simpli- city), which consists of a cylindrical tube for the reception of the achromatic condenser, the polarizing prism, and other fittings; to this secondary stage, also, a rotatory motion is communicated by the turning of a milled head; and a traversing movement of limited extent is likewise given to it by means of two screws, one on the front and the other on the left hand side of the frame which carries it, in order thatits axis may be brought into perfect coincidence with the axis of the “ body.” The special advantages of this instrument consist in its perfect steadiness, in the admirable finish of its workmanship, and in the variety of movements which may be given both to the object and to the fittings of the secondary stage. Its disadvantages consist in the want of porta- bility, necessarily arising from the substantial mode of its con- struction; and in the multiplicity of its movable parts, which presents to the beginner an aspect of great complexity. This complexity, however, is much more apparent than real ; for each of these parts Has an independent action of its own, the nature of which is very soon learned; and the various milled heads are so disposed, that the hand readily (and at last almost instine- tively) finds its way from one to the other, so as to make any re- quired adjustment, whilst the eye is steadily directed to the ob- ject. To the practised observer, therefore, this multiplication of adjustments is a real saving of time and labor, enabling him to do perfectly and readily what might otherwise require much trouble, besides affording him certain capabilities which he would not otherwise possess at all. 38. Powell and Lealand’s Compound Microscope.—This instru- ment, represented in Fig. 28, is far lighter than the preceding in its general “ build,” without being at all deficient in steadi- ness; it has not, however, some of those improvements for which Mr. Ross’s plan of construction is especially adapted. The three-legged stand gives a firm support to the trunnions that carry the tube to which the stage is attached, and from which a triangular stem is raised, by the rack-and-pinion movement set in action by the double milled head, whereby the “coarse” adjustment of the focus is obtained. The triangular stem carries at its summit the transverse arm, which contains (as in Mr. Ross’s Microscope) the lever action of the “fine” adjustment; and this is acted on by the milled head at the back of the arm, whence also pass two oblique stays, which, being attached to the upper part of the body, assist in preventing its POWELL AND LEALAND’S MICROSCOPE. 111 vibration. The stage is provided with a traversing movement in each direction, to the extent of about three-quarters of an inch; this is effected on the plan known as Turrell’s, in which the two milled heads Fra. 28 are placed on the, = same axis, instead of side by side, one of them being also re- peated on the left hand of the stage, so that the movements may be communi- cated either by the right hand alone, or by both hands in com- bination. The plat- form which carries the object is made to slide, asin the preced- ing case, on the sum- mit of the traversing apparatus ; and it has not only a_ ledge whereon the object may rest, but also a “spring clip” for se- curing it whenever the stage may be placed in a vertical position. This plat- form, moreover, is so connected with the traversing apparatus, that it may be turned round in the direction of its plane; but as this rotation takes place above instead of beneath the traversing apparatus, there is no security that the centre of rotation shall coincide with the axis of the optical portion of the instrument; so that, unless this adjustment have been previously made, the object will’ be thrown completely out of the field of view when the platform is made to revolve. Hence, although this movement is of great use in facilitating the full examination of an object, by enabling the observer to bring it into the field of view in every variety of position, it does not serve, like the rotatory movement of Mr. Ross’s stage, to change the position of the object in regard to the illuminating apparatus, without disturb- ing the observer’s view of it. The condenser for transparent objects, the polarizing apparatus, &c., are here fitted to the under Powell and Lealand’s Large Compound Microscope. 112 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MICROSCOPE. side of the principal stage itself, instead of to an independent or secondary stage; an arrangement which, though convenient as regards compactness, admits of less variety of adjustment than is afforded by the latter plan. The mirror, instead of being swung loosely upon two centres, is pivofed to one end of a quadrant of brass, of which the other end is pivoted to a strong pin that projects from the sliding tube; a spring being s0 at- tached to each of these pivots, as to give to the movements of the mirror that suitable degree of stiffness, which shall prevent it from being disturbed by a passing touch. No instrument can be better adapted than this to all the ordinary wants of the Mi- croscopist ; there are very few purposes which it cannot be made to answer; and there are many who will consider that its defi- ciency as to these is counterbalanced (to say the least) by its comparative simplicity and portability, as well as by its lower cost. For the sake, however, of such as may desire the power of obtaining a more oblique illumination, than is permitted by the construction of the stage in the instrument just described, Messrs. P. and L. have recently brought out a new pattern, in which the thickness of the stage is greatly reduced, a sub-stage is provided for the reception of the condenser and other fittings, and the mirror is mounted on a doubly extending arm. 39. Smith and Beck's Large Microscope.—The general plan of this instrument (Fig. 29) nearly resembles that of the “ dissecting microscope” of the same makers, already noticed (§ 35), so far, at least, as regards the mode of supporting the body, and of effecting the focal adjustments; whilst in the construction of the stage, and in the arrangement of the fittings beneath, it differs from all the microscopes hitherto described. The stage is fur- nished with the usual traversing movements; but it is distin- guished by its thinness; and this is of importance in certain cases, as admitting of a more oblique illumination than could otherwise be obtained, and also as allowing the construction of the achromatic condenser (§ 56) to be much simplified. The platform for the object is fitted upon the traversing apparatus, in the same mode asin the microscope last described, and possesses the same kind of rotatory movement. Beneath the stage isa continuation of the gun-metal “limb” which carries the body; and this is ploughed out into a groove for the reception of a sliding-bar, which carries what may be termed the “secondary body,” namely, a short tube (seen beneath the stage), capable of being moved up and down by a milled head, and fitted for the reception of the achromatic condenser, polarizing apparatus, &e. This “secondary body” consequently answers the same purpose as the “secondary stage” of Mr. Ross’s microscope, and its rela- tions to the other parts of the instrument are essentially the same; but it differs in the following particulars :—first, that by being made to work in a groove which is in perfect correspon- dence with that wherein the principal “ body” works (this corre- SMITH AND BECK’S LARGE MICROSCOPE. 113 spondence being secured by the action of the planing machine that ploughs both grooves), the “secondary” body always has its axis so perfectly continuous with that of the first, that no special adjustment is need- Fig. 29. ed to “centre” the greater part of the illuminating apparatus; and, secondly, that the tube will carry the achromatic condenser at its upper end, the polaris- ing prism at its lower, and the selenite plates between the two, a combination that cannot be made in any other instrument (§ 63). Moreover, as all these fittings are received into a tube of which the exact size and position are assured, the makers of this instrument can supply ad- ditional apparatus at any time, with the certainty of its accurate adjustment. This “secondary body,” however, has not the rota- tory movement possessed by Mr. Ross’s “‘ secondary stage ;”’ and to the limited class of purposes, there- fore, which that move- ment is adapted to serve, it cannot be adapted. Smith and Beck’s Large Compound Microscope. The mirror is hung in the usual way between two centres; but the semicircle that carries these, instead of being at once pivoted to the tube which slides upon the cylindrical stem, is attached to an intermediate arm; and by means of this it may be placed in such a position as to reflect light very ob- liquely upon the object,-and thus to bring out a new set of ap- pearances, with which it is very important in certain cases to be acquainted. In regard to weight and complexity, this instrument holds.a position intermediate between the two last described. The mode in which the body is supported, appears to the author decidedly preferable to that adopted by the other makers; and though it has the disadvantage of separating the focal adjust- ments from each other and from the stage motions more widely than is the case in the two preceding instruments, yet the differ- ence is scarcely perceptible in practice. The milled heads acting on the former are both of them in positions in which they are 8 114 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MICROSCOPE. easily reached by the left hand, when the elbow is resting on the table; whilst the right hand finds the milled heads of the travers- ing stage and of the secondary body in close proximity to each other. The imperfection of the means of giving rotation to the object, constitutes in this, as in Powell and Lealand’s microscope, a point of inferiority to Ross’s; the number of cases in which such a movement is important, however, is by no means consi- derable. On the other hand, the arrangement of the illuminating apparatus in Smith and Beck’s Microscope, seems to the author to present some decided advantages over that adopted by either of the other makers; and in point of general excellence of work- manship, this instrument cannot be surpassed. Without any invidious comparisons, it may be safely said that whoever desires to possess a first-class Microscope, cannot do bet- ter than select one of the three instruments last described; the excellence of the optical performance of the lenses supplied by their respective makers, being so nearly on a par, that the choice may be decided chiefly by the preference which the taste of the purchaser, or the nature of the researches on which he may be engaged, may lead him to entertain, for one or other of the plans of construction which has now been brought under notice. 40. Nachet’s Binocular Microscope.—Since that remarkable invention of Prof. Wheatstone, the Stereoscope, has led to a general appreciation of the value of binocular vision, in conveying to the mind a notion of the solid forms of bodies, various attempts have been made to apply the same principle to the Microscope. To any one who understands the principle of the Stereoscope, a little consideration will make it obvious that this end might be theoretically attained, by placing, two microscope-bodies at such an angle of inclination, that their respective object-glasses should point to the same object, whilst their eye-pieces should be at the ordinary distance of the right and left cyes from each other; but this practical difficulty will obviously and necessarily arise, in bringing the two microscopes into the requisite convergence,— that the axes of the instruments cannot be approximated suffi- ciently closely at their lower ends, unless the objectives employed should be of a focus so long, that the value of such an instrument would be extremely limited. It was early seen, therefore, that the only feasible method would be to use but a single objective for both bodies; but to bisect the pencils of rays emerging from this lens, so as to cause all those which have issued from the ob- ject in such a direction as to pass through either half of it, to be refracted into the body situated on that side; so that the two eyes, applied to the two eye-pieces respectively, shall receive through the two halves of the objective, two magnified images of the object differing from each other in perspective projection, as if the object, actually enlarged to the dimensions of its image, had been viewed by both eyes at once at a moderate distance. NACHET’S BINOCULAR MICROSCOPE. 115 ‘That such a method would produce the Stereoscopic effect, might be anticipated from the result of the very simple experiment of covering the right-hand or the left-hand half of an object-glass of low power, during the examination of any object that lies in oblique perspective; for the two views of it thus obtained, will be found to present just the kind and degree of difference which is observable in stereoscopic pictures. The first attempt to put this plan into execution, seems to have been that of Prof. Riddell, of New Orleans; but the results of his method, as followed by opticians on the European side of the Atlantic, were far from answering the expectations excited by his own description of them. The subject was both theoretically and practically inves- tigated by Mr. Wenham, with much ability (Transactions of the Microscopical Society, new series, Vol. I, p. 1); and a Binocular Microscope on a pattern suggested by him, was constructed by Messrs. Smith and Beck. This, too, was far from satisfactory in its performance, having two capital defects; namely, first, that the view which it gave was often pseudoscopic, the projecting por- tions of the object appearing to be depressed, and vice versé ; and second, that the two bodies being united at a fixed angle of con- vergence, the distance between their axes could not be con- veniently adapted to the varying distances of the eyes of different individuals. The construction adopted by M. Nachet, however, is much more successful. His method is to divide the pencil of rays issuing from the objec- Fra. 30. tive, by means of a prism (Fig. 80, p) whose section is an equilateral triangle; for the rays a6 on the right side, . which enter the flattened sur- | face presented to them, are reflected, by impinging very obliquely against one of the | internal faces of the prism, i towards the left, emerging es again from the prism, as they . had entered it, almost at right ‘ angles; and in like manner Ly “Ne the rays a’ 0’ on the left side | are reflected towards the \ 6: wu right. Each of these pencils is received by a similar prism, : which again changes its direc- Arrangement of Prisms in Nachet’s Binocular tion, so as to render it parallel TEEDES EEE to its original course; and thus the two halves a 6 and a’ b! of the original pencil are completely separated from each other to any interval that may be required, this interval being determined by the distance between the central and the lateral prisms. In 116 CONSTRUCTION OF THE MICROSCOPE. Fig. 81 is shown the Binocular Microscope constructed by M. Fic. 31. Nachet upon this plan. The arrangement of the base and stage is that commonly employed in French vertical Microscopes ; and a stem rises from the back of it, with which the double body is connected by a rack-and-pinion movement that gives the focal adjustment. The apparatus of prisms shown in Fig. 30, is placed between the object-glass and the lower ends of the bodies; and by means of a double-threaded screw acted on by a milled head between the two bodies, they may be separated from, or approximated towards, each other; so that the distance between their axes may be brought to coincide with the dis- tance between the axes of the eyes of the individual observer. The author can con- firm by his own experience the statement of M. Nachet, that this instrument is en- tirely free from that tendency to produce pseudoscopic effects, which is the great drawback in Prof. Riddell’s and in Mr. Wenham’s arrangements; and it comes so near the theoretical standard of perfection, when used with low powers of moderate Nachet's Binocular Microscope. anerture, that its performance may be con- sidered highly satisfactory. Its definition, however, when used with higher powers of larger angular aperture, has not yet been rendered sufficiently good, to enable it to afford a satisfactory view of the more difficult class of test-objects; and it may be doubted whether, considering the number of deflections which the rays undergo in their course, such perfect definition is to be anticipated. For although their general course on entering and emerging from each prism may be perpendicular to its surfaces, so that they suffer no refraction, many of them will be slightly oblique, and will therefore undergo not only refraction, but also some amount of chromatic dispersion. And it is moreover to be recollected, that when high powers are being employed, and especially such as are of large angular aperture, the smallest de- parture from exactitude in the focal adjustment gives indistinct- ness to the image. Now the special object of this instrument being to convey to the mind the notion of the solid forms of objects, of which some parts project more than others, it is obvi- ous that the rays proceeding from the projecting parts cannot be so nearly brought to the same focus with those from the receding, as to produce an even tolerably distinct image of both at once. It seems likely to be only with objectives of comparatively low power and small angular aperture, that images suitable for the NACHET’S BINOCULAR MICROSCOPE, 117 production of Stereoscopic effects will be produced; but for cer- tain classes of objects, this mode of exhibition is most admirably adapted, the solid forms of the Polycystina (Chap. X), for example, being brought out by it (especially when they are viewed as opaque, not as transparent objects) with such a reality, as to make them resemble carved ivory balls which the hand feels ready to grasp. 41, The same method of dividing the pencil of rays issuing from the object glass, by a separating prism placed in its course, has been applied by M. Nachet to another purpose,—that of en- abling two or more observers to look at the same object at once, which is often a matter not only of considerable convenience, but also of great importance, especially in the demonstration of dissections. The account given by M. Nachet of the construc- tion of this instrument, as adapted for two persons, will be found in the “Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science,” Vol. II, p. 72; he has subsequently devised another arrangement, by which the form of the separating prism is adapted to divide the pencil into three or even four parts, each of which may be di- rected into a different body, so as to give to several observers at one time a nearly identical image of the same object. Of course, the larger the number of secondary pencils into which the pri- mary pencil is thus divided, the smaller will be the share of light which each observer will receive ; but this reduction does not in- terfere with the distinctness of the image, and may be in some degree compensated by a greater intensity of illumination. (See Appendix for a description of American instruments and mo- difications.) , CHAPTER ILI. ACCESSORY APPARATUS. 42. In describing the various pieces of accessory apparatus with which the Microscope may be furnished, it will be con- venient in the first place to treat of those which form (when in use) part of the instrument itself, being Appendages either to its Body or to its Stage, or serving for the Hlumination of the ob- jects which are under examination ; and secondly to notice such as have for their function to facilitate that examination, by en- abling the microscopist to bring the Objects conveniently under his inspection. Section 1. APPENDAGES TO THE Microscope. 43. Draw-Tube.—It is advantageous for many purposes, that the Eye-piece should be fitted, not at once into the “ body” of the Microscope, but into an intermediate tube ; the drawing out of which, by augmenting the distance between the object-glass and the image which it forms in the focus of the eye-glass, still further augments the size of the image in relation to that of the object (§ 20). For although the magnifying power cannot be thus increased with advantage to any considerable extent, yet, if the corrections of the object-glass have been perfectly adjusted, its performance is not seriously impaired by a moderate lengthen- ing of the body ; and this may be conveniently had recourse to on many occasions, in which some amplification is desired, inter- mediate between the powers furnished by any two objectives. Thus if one object-glass give a power of 80 diameters, and another a power of 120, by using the first and drawing the eye- piece, its power may be increased to 100. Again, itis often very useful to make the object fill up the whole, or nearly the whole, of the field of view: thus if an object that is being viewed by transmitted rays, is so far from transparent as to require a strong light to render its details visible, the distinctness of its details 1s very much interfered with, if, through its not occupying the peripheral part of the field, a glare of light enter the eye around its margin ; and the importance of this adjustment is even greater, if opaque objects mounted on black disks are being viewed by DRAW-TUBE—ERECTOR. 119 the Lieberkthn (§ 65), since if any light be transmitted to the eye direct from the mirror, in consequence of the disk failing to ‘ occupy the centre field, it greatly interferes with the vividness and distinctness of the image of the object. In the use of the Micrometric eye-pieces to be presently described (§§ 45, 46), very great advantage is to be derived from the assistance of the draw- tube; as enabling us to make a precise adjustment between the divisions of the stage micrometer, and those of the eye-piece mi- crometer; and as.admitting the establishment of a more con- venient numerical relation between the two, than could be other- wise secured without far more elaborate contrivances. More- over, if, for the sake of saving room in packing, it be desired to reduce the length of the body, the draw-tube affords a ready means of doing so; since the body may be made to “shut up,” like a telescope, to little more than half its length, without any impairment of the optical performance of the instrument when mounted for use. 44, Hrector.—It is only, however, in the use of the Erector, that the full value of the draw-tube, and the advantage of giving to it a rack-and-pinion movement of its own (§ 35), come to be fully appreciated. This instrument, first applied to the Compound Microscope by Mr. Lister, consists of a tube about three inches long, having a meniscus at one end and a plano-convex lens at the other (the convex sides being upwards in each case), with a diaphragm nearly half way between them; and this is screwed into the lower end of the draw-tube, as shown in Fig. 32. Its effect is (like the corresponding erector of the Telescope), to an- ‘tagonize the reversion of the image formed by the object-glass, by producing a second reversion, so as to make the image presented to the eye correspond in position with the object. The passage of the rays through two additional lenses, of course occasions a certain loss of light by reflection from their surfaces, besides subjecting them to aberrations whereby the distinctness of the image is somewhat impaired; but this need not be an obstacle to its use for the class of purposes for which it is especially adapted in other respects (§ 35), since these seldom require a Pran-tube iltea very high degree of defining power. By the position given to the Erector, it is made subservient to another pur- pose, of great utility; namely, the procuring a very extensive range of magnifying power, without any change in the objective. For when the draw-tube, with the erector fitted to it, is com- pletely pushed in, the acting length of the body (so to speak) is so greatly reduced by the formation of the first image much nearer the objective, that, if a lens of 8-10ths of an inch focus be employed, an object of the diameter of 1 inch can be taken in, Fig. 32, 120 ACCESSORY APPARATUS. and enlarged to no more than 4 diameters; whilst, on the other hand, when the tube is drawn out to its whole length, the ob- ject is enlarged 100 diameters. Of course every intermediate range can be obtained, by drawing out the tube more or less; and the facility with which this can be accomplished, renders such an instrument most useful in various kinds of research, especially those in which it is important, after finding an object with a lower power, to examine it under a higher amplification ; since this may be done, without either a change of objectives, or a transfer of the object to another microscope fitted with a dif: ferent power. It is when the draw-tube is thus made subservient to the use of the Erector, that the value of its rack-and-pinion adjustment is most felt; for by giving motion to the milled head which acts upon this (Fig. 22) with one hand, whilst the other hand is kept upon the milled head which moves the whole body (it being necessary to shorten the distance between the object and the objective, in proportion as the distance of the image from the objective is increased), the observer—after a little prac- tice in the working together of the two adjustments—may al- most instantaneously alter his power to any amount of amplifica- tion which he may find the object to require, without ever losing a tolerably distinct view of it. This can scarcely be accomplished without the rack movement; since, if both hands be required to make the alteration of the draw-tube, the readjustment of the focus must be effected subsequently. 45. Micrometer.—Although some have applied their micro- metric apparatus to the stage of the microscope, yet it is to the Eye-piece that it may be most advantageously adapted.1 The cobweb micrometer, invented by Ramsden for Telescopes, is pro- bably, when well constructed, the most perfect instrument that the Microscopist can employ. It is made by stretching across the field of a “positive” eye-piece (§ 23) two very delicate paral- lel wires or cobwebs, one of which can be separated from the other by the action of a fine-threaded screw, the head of which is divided at its edge into a convenient number of parts, which successively pass by an index as the milled head is turned. A por- tion of the field of view on one side is cut off at right angles to the cobweb threads, by a scale formed of a thin plate of brass having notches at its edge, whose distance corresponds to that of the threads of the screw, every fifth notch being made deeper than the rest for the sake of ready enumeration. The object being brought into such a position that one of its edges seems to touch the stationary thread, the other thread is moved by the micrometer screw, until it appear to lie in contact with the other edge of the object; the number of entire divisions on the scale 1 The Stage-micrometer constructed by Fratinhofer is employed by many continental Microscopists; but it is subject to this disadvantage,—that any error in its performance is augmented by the whole magnifying power employed; whilst a like error in the Eye- piece-micrometer is increased by the magnifying power of the eye-piece alone. MICROMETER EYE-PIECE. 121 shows how many complete turns of the screw must have been made in thus separating the threads ; while the number to which the index points on the milled head, shows what fraction of a turn may have been made in addition. It is usual, by employ- ing a screw of 100 threads to the inch, to give to each division of the scale the value of 1-100th of an inch, and to divide the milled head into 100 parts; but the absolute value of the divi- sions is of little consequence, since their micrometric value de- pends upon the objective with which the instrument may be em- ployed. This must be determined by means of a ruled slip of glass laid upon the stage; and as the distance of the divisions even in the best ruled slip is by no means uniform,’ it is advisa- ble to take an average of several measurements, both upon dif- ferent slips, and upon different parts of the same slip. Here the draw-tube will be of essential use, in enabling the microscopist to bring the value of the divisions of his Micrometer to even num- bers. Thus, suppose that with a 1-4th-inch object-glass, the tube being pushed in, a separation of the lines by one entire turn and 37-100ths of another were needed to take in the space be- tween two lines on the ruled slip, whose actual distance is 1-1000th of an inch; then it is obvious that 137 divisions on the milled head are equivalent with that power to a dimension of 1-1000th of an inch, or the value of each division is 1-137,000th of aninch. But as this is an awkward number for calculation, the magnifying power may be readily increased by means of the draw-tube, until the space of 1-1000th of an inch shall be repre- sented by a separation of the cobweb threads to the extent of 150 divisions; thus giving to each division the much more con- venient value of 1-150,000th of an inch. The Microscopist who applies himself to researches requiring micrometric measure- ment, should determine the value of his Micrometer with each of the objectives he is likely to use for the purpose ; and should keep a table of these determinations, recording in each case the extent to which the tube has been drawn out, as marked by the graduated scale of inches which it should possess. The accuracy with which measurements may be made with this instrument, is not really quite so minute as it appears to be; for itis found practically that when the milled head is so graduated, that, by moving it through a single division, the cobweb threads are se- parated or approximated by no more than 1-10,000th of an inch, it needs to be moved through four divisions, for any change in the position of the threads to be made sensible to the eye. Con- sequently, if three entire turns, or 300 divisions, were found to separate the threads so far as to coincide with a distance of 1-1000th of an inch on the ruled glass under a 1-8th of an inch ' OF the degree of this inequality, some idea may be formed from the statement of Hannover, that the value of the different divisions of a glass ruled by Chevalier to 1-100th of a millimetre, varied between the extreme ratios of 31°36, the mean of all being 34. 122 ACCESSORY APPARATUS. objective, although each division of the milled head, will thus represent 1-300,000th of an inch, yet the smallest measurable space will be four times that amount, or 1-75,000th of an inch. With the 1-12th inch objective, the smallest measurable space may be about 1-100,000th of an inch. ; 46. The expensiveness of the cobweb-micrometer being an im- portant obstacle to its general use, a simpler method is more com- monly adopted, which consists in the insertion of a transparent scale into the focus of the eye-piece, on which the image of the object is seen to be projected. By Mr. Ross, who first devised this method, the “ positive” eye-piece was employed, and a glass plate ruled in squares was attached beneath its field-glass, at such a distance that it and the image of the object should be in focus together ; and the value of these squares having been determined with each of the objectives, in the manner already described, the size of the object was estimated by the proportion of the square that might be occupied by its image. While the use of the posi- tive eye-piece, however, renders the definition of the ruled lines peculiarly distinct, it impairs the definition of the object; and the “ negative” or common Huyghenian eye-piece is now gene- rally preferred. The arrangement devised by Mr. G. Jackson allows the divided glass to be introduced into the ordinary eye- piece (thus dispensing with the necessity for one specially adapted for micrometry), and greatly increases the facility and accuracy with which the eye-piece scale may be used. This scale is ruled like that of an ordinary measure (7. e. with every tenth line long, and every fifth line half its length), on a slip of glass, which is so fitted into a brass frame (Fig. 33, B), as to have a slight motion towards either end; one of its extremities is pressed upon by a small fine milled-head- ed screw which works through the frame, and the other by a spring (concealedin the figure) which antagonizes the screw. The scale thus mounted is introduced through a pair of slits in the eye-piece tube, B immediately above the diaphragm (Fig. 33, 4), so as to oceupy the ¥ centre of the field ; and | it is brought accurately into focus by unscrew- : ing the glass nearest to the eye, until the lines of the scale are clearly seen. The value Fig. 83. Mr, Jackson’s Eye-piece Micrometer. MICROMETER EYE-PIECE. 133 of the divisions of this scale must be determined, as in the for- mer instance, by means of a ruled stage-micrometer, for each objective employed in micrometry (the drawing out of the eye- piece tube enabling the proportions to be adjusted to even and convenient numbers); and this having been accomplished, the scale is brought to bear upon the object to be measured, by moving the latter as nearly as possible into the centre of the field, and then rotating the eye-piece in such a manner, that the scale may lie across that diameter which it is desired to measure. The push- ing-screw at the extremity of the scale being then turned, until one edge of the object is.in exact contact with one of the long lines, the number of divisions which its diameter occupies is at once read off by directing the attention to the other edge,—the operation, as Mr. Quekett justly remarks, being nothing more than laying a rule across the body to be measured. This method of measurement may be made quite exact enough for all ordi- nary purposes, provided, in the first place, that the eye-piece scale be divided with a fair degree of accuracy; and secondly, that the value of its divisions be ascertained (as in the case of the cobweb-micrometer) by several comparisons with the scale laid upon the stage. Thus if; by a mean of numerous observa- tions, we establish the value of each division of the eye-piece scale to be 1-12,500th of an inch, then, if the image of an object be found to measure 33 of those divisions, its real diameter will be 32 x yaéy5 or 1-8571st of an inch... Now as, with an objec- tive of 1-12th inch focus, the value of the divisions of the eye- piece scale may be reduced to 1-25,000th of an inch, and as the eye can estimate a fourth ‘part of one of ‘the divisions with tole- rable accuracy, it follows that a magnitude of as little as 1-100,000th of an inch can be measured with a near approach to exactness, and that this instrument cannot be fairly considered as ranking much below the cobweb-micrometer in minute accuracy. At any rate, it is sufficiently precise (when due care is employed) for all ordinary purposes; and it has the great advantage of cheapness and simplicity. Whatever method be adopted, if the measurement be made in the Eye-piece, and not on the stage, it will be necessary to make allowance for the adjustment of the object-glass to the thickness of the glass that covers the object, since its magnifying power is considerably affected by the separa- tion of the front pair of lenses from those behind it (§ 83). It will be found convenient to compensate for this alteration, by altering the draw-tube in such a manner as to neutralize the effect. produced by the adjustment of the objective; thus giving one uniform value to the divisions of the eye-piece scale, what- 1 The calculation of the dimensions is most simplified by the adoption of a decimal scale ; the value of each division being made, by the use of the draw-tube adjustment, to correspond to some aliquot part of a ten-thousandth or a hundred-thousandth of an inch, and the dimensions of the object being then found by simple multiplication :—Thus (to take the above example) the value of each division in the decimal scale is ‘00008, and the diameter of the object is 00028. 1é4 ACCESSORY APPARATUS. ever may be the thickness of the covering-glass: the amount of the alteration required for each degree must of course be deter- mined by a series of measurements with the stage-micrometer, and should be recorded on the table of the micrometric values of the several objectives. 47. Goniometer—When the Microscope is employed in re- searches on minute crystals, a means of measuring their angles is provided by the adaptation of a goniometer to the eye-piece, The simplest form (contrived by Schmidt and made by Ross) which answers sufficiently well for all ordinary purposes, essen- tially consists merely of a “‘positive’’ eye-piece, with a single cobweb-thread stretched across it diametrically in a circular frame capable of rotation; the edges of this frame are graduated in de- grees, and a vernier is also attached to the index, whereby frac- tional parts of degrees may be read off. By rotating the frame carrying the thread, so that it shall lie successively in the direc- tions of the two sides of the crystal, the angle which they form is at once measured by the difference of the degrees to which the index points on the two occasions. For the cobweb-thread, a glass plate, ruled with parallel lines at about the 1-50th of an inch asunder, may be advantageously substituted; since it is not then necessary to bring the crystal into such a position as to lie along the diametrical thread, but its angle may be measured by means of any one of the lines to which it happens to be nearest. If a higher clegree of precision be required than this instrument is fitted to afford, the Doudble-refracting Goniometer, invented by Dr. Leeson, may be substituted; for a description of which (too long to be introduced here) the reader is referred to Dr. L.’s ac- count in the “ Proceedings of the Chemical Society,” Part xxxiii, and to Mr. Quekett’s ‘“ Practical Treatise on the Microscope.” (See Appendix for a description of a Micrometer and Goniometer, by Prof. J. L. Smith.) 48. Inedicator.—When the Microscope is used for the purpose of demonstrating to others such objects as may not be at once distinguished by the uninitiated eye, it is very useful to introduce into the eye-piece, just over the diaphragm, a small steel hand pointing to nearly the centre of the field; to whose extremity the particular portion of the image which the observer is intended to look at, is to be brought by moving the object. The hand may be so attached, as to be readily turned back when not re- quired; leaving the field of the eye-piece quite free. This little contrivance, which was devised by Mr. J. Quekett, is appropri- ately termed by him the indicator. 49. Camera Lucida.—Various contrivances may be adapted to the eye-piece, in order to enable the observer to see the image projected upon a surface whereon he may trace its outlines. The one most generally employed is the Camera Lucida prism con- trived by Dr. Wollaston for the general purposes of delineation; this being fitted on the front of the eye-piece, in place of the CAMERA LUCIDA. 125 “cap”: by which it is usually surmounted. The Microscope being placed in a horizontal position, as shown in Fig. 34, the rays which pass through the eye-piece into the prism, sustain such a total reflection from its oblique surface, that they come to its upper horizontal —sur- face at right an- gles to their pre- vious direction ; and the eye being so placed over the edge of this surface, that it receives _ these rays from the prism through part of the pupil, whilst it looks beyond the prism, down to a white-paper surface on the table, with the other half, it sees the image so strongly and clearly projected upon that surface, that the only difficulty in tracing it arises from a certain incapacity which seems to exist in some individuals, for seeing the image and the tracing-point at the same time. This difficulty (which is common to all instruments devised for this purpose) is lessened by the interposition of a slightly convex lens in the position shown in the figure, between the eye and the paper, in order that the rays from the paper and tracing-point may diverge at the same angle as those which are received from the prism; and it may be generally got over altogether, by experimentally modi- fying the relative degrees of light received from the object and from the paper. If the image be too bright, the paper, the tracing-point, and the outline it has made, are scarcely seen; and either less light may be allowed to come from the object, or more light (as by a taper held near) may be thrown on the paper and tracing-point. Sometimes, on the other hand, measures of the contrary kind must be taken. Instead of the prism, some microscopists prefer a speculum of polished steel, of smaller size than the ordinary pupil of the eye, fixed at an angle of 45° in front of the eye-piece ; and this answers exactly the same purpose as the precéding, since the rays from the eye-piece are reflected vertically upwards to the central part of the pupil placed above the mirror, whilst, as the eye also receives rays from the paper and tracer, in the same direction, through the peripheral portion of the pupil, the image formed by the microscope is visually pro- jected downwards, as in the preceding case. This disk, the in- Fre, 34, Microscope arranged with Camera Lucida for Drawing or Micrometry. 126 ACCESSORY APPARATUS, vention of the celebrated anatomist Soemmering, is preferred by some microscopic delineators to the caimera lucida. The fact is, however (as the author can testify from his own experience), that there is a sort of “knack” in the use of each instrument, which is commonly acquired by practice alone; and that a person habi- tuated to the use of either of them, does not at first work well with another.