hee
Amaro
PH ieee cen
erent
Gift of Lyman C. Root
Formerly owned ty, Moses
ALBERT R. MANN Quinb
LIBRARY
New York STATE COLLEGES
OF
AGRICULTURE AND HoME ECONOMICS
AT
CORNELL UNIVERSITY
EVERETT FRANKLIN PHILLIPS
BEEKEEPING LIBRARY
kK
iM
af
Cornell University
The original of this book is in
the Cornell University Library.
There are no known copyright restrictions in
the United States on the use of the text.
http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924003214883
Cornell University Library
SF 523.H256
Bees and b
keeping: a plain, practical
UL
3 1924 003 214 883 nama
BEES AND BEE-KEEPING:
A PLAIN, PRACTICAL WORK;
RESULTING FROM YEARS OF EXPERIENCE AND CLOSE OBSERVATION IN EXTENSIVE
APIARIES, BOTH IN PENNSYLVANIA AND CALIFORNIA,
WITH DIRECTIONS
HOW 10 MAKE BEB-KERPING A DESIRABLE AND LUCRATIVE BUSINESS,
AND FOR
SHIPPING BEES TO CALIFORNIA.
BY
W. CO. HARBISON,
PRACTICAL APIARIAN,
NEW YORK:
C. M. SAXTON, BARKER & CO.
AGRICULTURAL BOOK PUBLISHERS, No. 25 PARK ROW.
1860.
BEES AND BEE-KEEPING:
A PLAIN, PRACTICAL WORK;
RESULTING FROM YEARS OF EXPERIENCE AND CLOSE OBSERVATION IN EXTENSIVE
APIARIES, BOTH IN PENNSYLVANIA AND OALIFORNIA.
WITH DIRECTIONS
HOW 10 MAKE BRB-KERPING A DESIRABLE AND LUCRATIVE BUSINESS,
AND FOR
SHIPPING BEES TO CALIFORNIA.
BY
W. 0. HARBISON,
PRACTICAL APIARIAN,
NEW YORK:
C. M. SAXTON, BARKER & CO.
AGRICULTURAL BOOK PUBLISHERS, No. 25 PARK ROW.
1860.
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1860, by
W. C. HARBISON,
In the Clerk’s Office of the District Court of the United States for the Western District
of the State of Pennsylvania.
W. 8. HAVEN, PRINFER AND STEREOTYPER, PITTSBURGH, PA.
@ 946555"
bs
PREFACE.
Tur author of this treatise, having been taught from youth
to work with Bees, ever admiring their great sagacity, industry
and perseverance, and desiring to turn their industry to ac-
count as a matter of profit, directed all his efforts to acquire
a correct knowledge of their habits, wants and requirements
necessary to continued prosperity and profit.
He observed, years ago, that when the seasons were fa-
vorable for producing abundance of honey, bees invariably
flourished and increased rapidly, yielding large returns in the
shape of surplus honey, bidding defiance to worms and all
other enemies, being evidently prosperous and happy; but
when scarcity prevailed, the very reverse of this condition of
things was true; adversity took the place of prosperity—some
would starve, others would fall a prey to their enemies. The
succession of honey-producing flowers has been materially
influenced by the clearing up and bringing under cultivation
of our lands, essentially changing the condition of things,
affecting the prosperity of bees at certain seasons of the
-year, in about the same ratio that it has cattle or other stock
which was permitted to run in the woods, as it was called
(when their pasture grounds were fenced in, then supplies
(iii)
iv PREFACE.
were cut off); with this difference, that for all other stock
provision has been made to suit the change of circumstances,
but for bees no care has been manifested, hence they have been
steadily decreasing in numbers in the older settled parts of
our country, until the fact becomes apparent, that without a
change of policy in this direction they will eventually become
extinct; or at least prevent bee-keeping from assuming any
importance, because of its uncertainty.
This state of facts led me to inquire, what could be done to
render bee-keeping as reliable and certain in its results as
other rural pursuits. Having examined all the works on bee
culture that I could procure (some of which were very valu-
able), all failed to point out a practical plan to feed bees, or
supply them with a uniform succession of flowers, or pasturage,
sufficient to keep them as prosperous as when wild flowers
abounded. We are told, it is true, to feed them a little in the
field to keep them from starving through the winter or early
spring; but they rather discountenance feeding for any other
purpose or providing pasturage with a view to keep them con-
stantly advancing from spring to fall. Being well assured that
it would pay better to keep bees employed from early spring
until fall, than to let them remain idle for want of something
to do, I adopted the plan of either feeding, as directed in the
chapter on feeding, or cultivated such crops as would furnish
them with abundant supplies. This plan I have practiced for
some time past both in Pennsylvania and California, to which
latter State, in connection with J. S. Harbison, of Sacramento,
I made two large and successful shipments of bees.
PREFACE. Vv
The results of my practice, and the success that has invari-
ably crowned my efforts in the management of bees, has been
favorably and extensively noticed by the press, and has
induced persons from various parts of the United States to
write letters of inquiry respecting my mode of managing
bees, leading to such satisfactory results; these letters have
accumulated to such an extent, that it is impossible to answer
each personally and satisfactorily ; hence I concluded to give to
the public a synopsis of my experience, with such hints and
suggestions as may possibly benefit some bee-keepers and ad-
vance the general interest.
It is with pleasure that I acknowledge my indebtedness to
Mr. Quinby, for extracts from his valuable work entitled “The
Mysteries of Bee-Keeping Explained,” and also for other valu-
able matter kindly furnished by him. Although we may differ
upon some minor points in practice, there is but little differ-
ence as regards the general and leading features of bee-keeping.
I am also indebted to Bevan’s work on bees for valuable ex-
tracts.
I would here tender my thanks to the Rev. J. Lewis Shuck,
of Sacramento, California, for an article on bees and bee-keep-
ing in China.
In presenting this work to the public, I disclaim any pre-
tensions to literary attainments; my only object has been to
impart to others a knowledge of my experience.
1*
CONTENTS.
CHAPTER I.
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF THE HONEY BEE,
The queen, - 5 11 Do worker bees accord royal honors to
Description of the queen, - 12 queens, 30
Does the queen govern the colony, 13 Mode of rearing queens, 33
No sovercignty exercised by the queen Impregnation of queens, - 44
over the colony, 15 Langstroth’s theomy, 55
The economy of the colony directed by The worker bee, - ST
workers, + - 19 = Description of the working bee, 58
The only necessity for the queen is to The drone, 61
provideeggs, - - 23 Drone-laying queens, - 63
No eggs are deposited by the queen in Fertile workers, - 04
queen cells, > oe 26
SPRING.
CHAPTER II.
BREEDING OF BEES.
Rearing brood, - - + 6 Young bees reared without water, 71
Mode of commencing, - - - 68 Whenand how brood is reared up and
Mode of laying eggs described, - 69 perfected, 72
Description of the eggs, - + 69 Quantity of eggs laid by a queen, 15
CHAPTER III.
WAX.
Wax, 8 76 Comb, or architecture of Lees, vt)
Analysis of wax, 78 Economy of materials, 81
CHAPTER IV.
BEE-BREAD, OR POLLEN.
Boo bread, or pollen, 86 How pollen is stored, - 90
(vii)
vill CONTENTS.
CHAPTER V.
HONEY.
Different qualities of honey, - 93 Propolis, or bee-glue, - - 95
CHAPTER VI.
THE APIARY.
No danger of bees returning if removed
a mile or more, - 100
Kind of stands, 101
Another method, - 102
Still another plan, - 102
Proper height, - - - - 103
Distance between hives, - 104
Bee houses, - + « - 104
A simple shed preferred, . - 105
Another method of covering, - - 106
Procuring bees to commence an apiary,106
Kind of stocks to buy, - -107
Proper size and kind of hives, 108
Transporting bees short distances, - 109
Best time for transporting bees, - 110
CHAPTER VII.
BEE HIVES.
Improved movable comb hives, > 115 Specifications, Ce 122
Langstroth’s hive, . oe 116 Billoflumber, - - + + +126
Harbison’s improved movable comb Frames, - + + - + 17
hive, - 2 2 2 = 118 Phelps’ movable comb hive, + 128
CHAPTER VIII.
HONEY BOXES.
Glass boxes, - - + + + 129 Thesectional honey box, - + + 130
CHAPTER IX.
BEE PASTURAGE.
Best kind of early pasturage, - +188 | Mustard and mignonette, 138
The next pasturage, - 184 Cephglanthus, or butter-bush, - ~- 140
Early summer flowers, - - +186 Buckwheat, - - - . 141
SUMMER.
CHAPTER X.
MANAGEMENT OF BEES.
How to conquer bees, - 143 How to transfer, 7 5 6 + 146
Protection, - 144
CHAPTER XI.
ARTIFICIAL SWARMS.
To rear queens to supply artificial
swarms, - - 148
Making artificial swarms, 149
Another method, + + 163
Still another plan of dividing and
making artificial swarms, - - 155
How to strengthen artificial swarms, 158
Plan to prevent bees leaving new col-
onies and returning to the old one,160
CONTENTS. ix
CHAPTER XII.
FEEDING.
How to feed bees, - 162 —sEffects of feeding, versus non-feeding, 176
The importance of feeding bees con- A case where bees were not fed, - 177
sidored, - - + 164 How to manage bees in common box
Kind of feed used, + 169 hives, - - 181
Bevan on feeding, 171
CHAPTER XIII.
NATURAL SWARMING.
Time to expect first swarms, - 186
Cause of swarming, 190
Condition of things necessary for swar-
ming - - + 190
Requisites before preparation of queen
cells, - 191
State of queen cells when used, - 192
The state when swarms issue, - 193
Other symptoms immediately preced-
ing the issuing of a swarm, 194
The modus operandi of swarming, - 195
Alighting and hiving swarms, - 198
How to prevent swarms from leaving
their hives, - 201
What bees compose the new swarm, 202
Cultivate fruit trees in or near the
apiary, ce - 204
Swarms clustering, - - 2065
Do swarms send spies to seek a new
home, - - - - 206
Places generally selected by swarms, 207
To prevent more than one swarm
starting at one time, - 209
After-swarms, - 212
CHAPTER XIV.
HOW TO MAKE BEES PROFITABLE.
How to make becs profitable without a rapid increase of colonies, -
- 217
CHAPTER XV.
LOSS OF QUEENS.
Cause of their loss, - 3 2 2B
Indication of the loss, - - + 224
The result, -
CHAPTER XVI.
MANAGEMENT OF HONEY.
Putting on honey boxes, - » 226 How to kill worms in honey boxes, - 230
Taking off surplus honey, - - 226 Packing honey boxes for carrying to
Keeping and marketing honey, 228 market, - . - 231
CHAPTER XVII.
ENEMIES OF BEES.
Enemies of bees, - 232 Irritability of bees, - - = 233
CHAPTER XVIII.
OVERSTOCKING.
Can the country bo overstocked with bees, - 2 2 - +234
x CONTENTS.
CHAPTER XIX.
WATERING BEES.
Watering bees, 240
Mr. Quinby’s letter on watering bees, 243
CHAPTER XX.
SHIPPING BEES TO CALIFORNIA.
Shipping bees to California, - - 246
No bees in California prior to its con-
quest by the Americans, = 249
The first stock of beesin California, 252
Other shipments, - - 252
How our first shipment was prepared, 254
Sevond shipment—how prepared, - 255
Peculiarities of bees in California, 259
AUTUMN.
CHAPTER XXI.
“ROBBING.
Robbing, -~ - - - = - 261
Cause of robbing, - - = 262
How to prevent robbing, - + 262
How to detect robbing, - - - 268
Remedy, - - -
CHAPTER XXII.
UNITING SWARMS.
Uniting weak swarms in the fall, - 265
To unite swarms in box hives,- - 266
WINTER.
CHAPTER XXIII.
WINTERING BEES.
Protection, - oe - 268
‘The invention of winter mats, 278
Another method of making winter
mats, - 275
Mode of applying them, - + + 275
‘Mr. Quinby’s opinion of tho value of
these winter mats, - - - 278
.Patent applied for, - - 278
How bees winter if left to themselves, 279
Best shaped hive for wintering bees in, 231
Wintering bees in dark rooms, = 282
CHAPTER XXIV.
PROFITS OF BEE KEEPING,
CHAPTER XXV.
HONEY BEE IN CHINA, - es
WHERE RIGHTS MAY BE OBTAINED,
: = 288
BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
CHAPTER I.
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF THE HONEY BEE.
THE Bex is considered by naturalists as belonging
to what are called perfect societies of insects, and in
entomological arrangements is placed in the order
of Hymenoptera, genus Apis. Every association or
colony of bees comprises three descriptions of indi-
viduals, and each description is distinguished by an
appearance and cast of character peculiar to itselfi
(Bevan.)
THE QUEEN.
The queen, as she is now generally called (the
mother bee would be a much more appropriate name
to designate the functions which properly belong to
her in the economy of the hive), is without doubt
the most important personage in the association, or
colony; not from any useful labor which she per-
forms in building combs, storing honey, or anything
of this kind, nor yet for enacting laws and dictating
(11)
12 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
to the rest of the colony what they shall and what
they shall not do, with that pomp and dignity sup-
posed to be the prerogative of earthly potentates gen-
erally; but for the humble position and for the sim-
ple purpose of laying eggs from which the young are
reared, and thus becomes the means of extending and
perpetuating her species.
In discussing this part of my subject, my expe-
rience will necessarily lead me to differ, on some
points, from writers whose ipse dixit is generally re-
ceived as orthodox.
DESCRIPTION OF THE QUEEN.
The queen, or mother bee, is easily
distinguished from all other bees in the
colony, by a more measured, sedate
movement; the greater length of her
body, which tapers gradually to a point;
the proportionate shortness of her
tas queen. wings, Which reach but little beyond
her middle, ending about the third ring of her ab-
domen, but are very strong and sinewy; her head is
rounder, her trunk or thorax more slender and but
little more than half the length of that of the com-
mon worker bee; her legs, though longer, have nei-
ther brushes nor baskets for collecting pollen; she
differs in color from all other bees in the colony, as
much as in shape—the upper part of her body is of a
much brighter black, the under surface and the legs
are of a dark orange or copper color, the hind legs
being rather darker than the rest.
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 13
DOES THE QUEEN GOVERN THE COLONY?
My experience upon this point is, that she does
not, or if she does exercise any controlling power, it
is to a very limited extent indeed; but on the con-
trary, I firmly believe her to be a creature of the col-
ony, or worker bees, and subject to their power and
control, from the time the egg is deposited from
which she is reared, up to the perfect queen, and
from that time to the day of her death. It is gen-
erally conceded that the worker bees possess the pow-
er to rear a queen from any egg deposited in a worker
cell, and it is generally supposed that the change is
caused by the quantity and quality of food given them
whilst in the larva state, producing a fully developed
insect instead of one but partially developed, as in
the case of the common workers, and in this opin-
ion I fully concur. Now if food can be varied to
produce such striking results as this, may it not pro-
duce very important results in another direction? (as
I will have occasion to refer to hereafter.) Thus we
find the common bees can rear a queen at pleasure,
when they have eggs. Now suppose the old queen
is removed from a colony when in possession of eggs,
what is the result? Do they scatter off, hither and
thither, having lost their governor or sovereign; or
do they become lazy, indolent or reckless, not caring
now to protect their stores, as would most unques-
tionably be the case were they dependent upon the
queen to direct them in their duty, allotting to each
their task? Nay, every observing apiarian can tes-
tify to the reverse of all this.
2
14 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
When the queen is removed they very soon miss
her, and immediately make a diligent search for her
in and about the hive, apparently manifesting a great
anxiety for her safety. If she is not found in a short
time, they settle down and go to work quietly, as if
nothing unusual had happened. To replace their
lost queen now seems to be their greatest concern.
It would be very difficult for the most skillful and
careful observer to detect any thing different in their
movements from those in possession of a queen; the
only difference, perhaps, is, that if any comb is built
it is pretty certain to be drone cells. Honey and
pollen will be gathered and stored, and every thing
carried on with the same order and precision that it
could be if a queen was present. Now if the queen
rules a colony and directs its movements, laying out
all the plans, &c. as most writers would have us be-
lieve, where is the directing or governing power
vested, in the absence of a queen? Are the various
manipulations of the hive carried on at random? I
think not. Every bee, when it is born into the world,
is most unquestionably endowed by nature with that
instinct which prompts it to enter upon the discharge
of its appropriate duties, and also with the knowledge
and mechanical skill necessary to perform those du-
ties; no apprenticeship under skilled architects is
necessary to enable the young bee to build the most
beautiful comb, complete in all its relations, which
has been a problem to the most profound philoso-
phers and geometricians for centuries (the mode of
testing the truth of this position will be given in
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 15
another place); hence I think facts will justify me in
believing,
First. That no sovereignty is exercised by the
queen over the other bees in the colony.
Second. That the entire economy of the colony is
directed and executed by the worker bees, including,
to a very considerable extent, the actions of the
queen.
Third. The only necessity for the presence of the
qu@en is to supply the colony with eggs.
Fourth. That the time of laying eggs, and the
number required at any given period, is controlled
by the workers, and not by the queen.
Fifth. That no eggs are deposited in the queen
cells by queens.
Sixth. That no homage or filial affection is ren-
dered or manifested for the queen by the workers,
other than from the instinct of self-preservation.
NO SOVEREIGNTY EXERCISED BY THE QUEEN UPON THE
COLONY.
No doubt I will be pronounced heterodox by many,
and especially by cotemporary authors and their ad-
herents, who have made the sovereignty of the
queen and the homage and filial affection rendered
her by her loving subjects, a theme over which they
have become very eloquent, and even romantic.
This course on the part of authors tends, in my opin-
ion, to continue and perpetuate in a modified form
that mystery which has for ages surrounded and ob-
scured bees and bee-keeping, and no doubt in many
16 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
cases prevents persons from engaging in apiarian
pursuits (which are both pleasing and profitable),
from a dread of being unable to understand and
manage properly such a complicated kind of stock,
and one so uncertain and so difficult to comprehend.
Lapprehend that when the facts connected with
this subject are fully known, anda true knowledge of
the internal economy of the society of bees is simpli-
fied and presented truthfully, without being inter-
mixed with the remains of superstition, it will theif be
demonstrated that bees can be understood and man-
aged by the community at large upon the same gen-
eral principles, and with similar assurances of suc-
cess, as any other domestic stock. Any thing which
I may present will be for the purpose of simplifying
and removing objections which have by many been
considered insurmountable to bee-keeping, and not
with any desire to provoke controversy upon the part
of any with whom I may chance to differ.
In connection with my first proposition, that no
sovereignty is exercised by the queen, I have already
given my reasons for this conclusion to a considera-
ble extent, but will give some experiments to show
that each individual bee fully understands its own
duty from instinct, without any instruction. Just as
soon as they were able to commence the performance
thereof, I took a number of frames, (being full of
combs, brood, &ec.) shook the bees down on a sheet
in front of the hive; all the old bees, or nearly so,
would within a few minutes take wing and return to
their hive. I should remark, however, that a hive
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 17
was selected in which a large amount of brood had
been emerging for a day or two previous, and was
still emerging. With a little patience and care, al-
most every bee that is old enough to fly can be re-
moved or separated from those that are yet unable to
fly; in this manner enough of these young bees can
be obtained to make a small swarm, sufficient to
keep two brood combs warm, if other combs are
placed on each side, and the whole covered or closed
around, giving the colony space just in proportion to
its size. Combs were selected from which brood was
rapidly emerging; and an embryo queen was set in
one of the combs, in a central position. This exper-
iment was made in very warm weather; the entrance
was contracted so that robbers were not likely to at-
tack it. Now for the result. The first day, not a
single bee could be seen to enter or depart; the sec-
ond day, a bee might be seen coming out and appa-
rently making very short excursions, and again re-
turning; this only occurred at long intervals. On
examining the interior, the numbers seemed to be
very much increased by those that had emerged from
the comb; many bees could now be observed pretty
well developed, apparently capable of going abroad
to the fields and engaging in their daily avocations.
On the third day a few more could be seen at the
entrance. Fourth day, the number still increased ;
one could be seen occasionally carrying pollen;
young queen emerged evening of this day; colony
quite lively. Fifth day, began to work quite regu-
larly, evidently carrying both honey and _ pollen.
O*
1s BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
Sixth day, still increasing in strength. Seventh day,
working quite briskly, considering the size of the
colony. Eighth and ninth days, working as strong,
apparently, in proportion to their numbers, as any
stock in the apiary. On the evening of the ninth
day (five days from the time the queen emerged from
her cell), a few eggs were observed in one of the
combs. Tenth day, the number of eggs was greatly
increased; the queen was now fertile, and the exper-
iment of making a colony of bees, composed entirely
of young ones, without a single exception, was a
perfect success, the bees continuing to thrive and do
well.
We have instituted similar experiments with the
same result. Can it be supposed, with any degree
of plausibility, that those young bees were governed
by a queen, or other royal dignitary, four days having
elapsed without any queen being in the colony, ex-
cept the one yet sealed up in the cell; nor were there
any old bees to instruct them in the affairs of the
colony. I forgot to mention that three queen cells
were commenced before the queen emerged from her
cell, but of course were then discontinued. In one or
two cases, we have had them to rear and perfect
queens in this manner. ~
But I find, upon examination, that I am not the
first to suppose that the queen exercised no authority
over the other bees. Bonner, an eminent Scotch
writer of the last century, uses the following lan-
guage:
“ But as it is also now unanimously admitted that
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 19
she (the queen) lays every egg im the hive, she
ought rather be called the mother bee, for indeed
from the best observation that ever I could make,
she possesses and exerts no sovereignty over the
other bees; she evidences the greatest anxiety for the
good of the commonwealth with which she is con-
nected, and indeed every member of it shows an
equal regard for her welfare; but I never could ob-
serve that she issues any positive orders to. be punctu-
ally obeyed by the other bees. The truth seems to
be, that she and the other bees are all equally ac-
quainted with their duty by instinct, and have an
equal pleasure in performing it, without waiting for
orders from each other. That there is, nevertheless,
the greatest order and regularity among them, is cer-
tain, for they lay their plans and execute them in the
best possible manner, by the influence of the above
powerful substitute for reason.”
THE ECONOMY OF THE COLONY DIRECTED BY THE WORKERS.
It seems evident that in the creation and organi-
zation of societies or colonies of honey bees, as in
other things, the sexes are, to a certain extent, depend-
ent on each other for the propagation and perpetua-
tion of their species; but here we have the strange
anomaly of the neuter gender, or rather of the unde-
veloped sex (of which the colony is mainly composed),
feeding and nursing the young, and caring for them
with as much parental devotion and solicitude as
though they were actually their own offspring, the
queen simply depositing the eggs in their appro-
20 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
priate place. It seems they also have the knowledge
and ability to rear the brood in such manner as
would seem best for the welfare of the colony, either
by rearing it all as undeveloped females (common
workers), or fully developing a portion thereof and
making queens.
I refer to eggs deposited in worker cells; those in
drone cells are drones, and nothing else. When a
swarm issues from a colony, the workers are the first
to go forth; a considerable portion of the swarm
generally emerges before the queen takes wing.
This rule is deviated from in many instances in after
swarms, but I never knew an instance with first
swarms. The workers are also the first to select a
place to cluster; and in many cases I have carefully
observed to see if the queen was first, or even among
the first, to alight; but as a general thing a consid-
erable portion of the swarm would cluster, when her
ladyship might be seen alighting in their midst.
I have known swarms to cluster, and in some cases
remain until put into the hive, and then return to
the parent stock, when I knew the queen had not
left at all, having seen her running round on the
alighting board and return into the hive, apparently
unable to fly, or unwilling to risk herself on the
wing; the bees evidently having done their part,
expected the queen to do hers. It is true, however,
that in a very few cases I have known the queen to
get down in the weeds or grass, being unable to arise
and fly again; the worker bees after some time
would discover her, and would then cluster upon and
ILISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 21
around her. But this is not their natural way of
doing; it is the exception, and not the rule. Hence
I conclude the worker bees lead off in swarming and
in clustering, the queen following instead of leading.
Her presence is absolutely necessary to the welfare
of the swarm, simply for the purpose of supplying
the means of replenishing the stock; of this they
seem perfectly aware. They prefer returning to the
parent stock to setting up without her.
When a swarm is hived, the workers lay the foun-
dation of the combs, and carry on the work until
finished ; the queen depositing eggs in the cells as
they are progressing, not waiting for their comple-
tion. They also collect the food necessary for the
sustenance of the entire colony. But some one is
ready to say, perhaps the queen directs all this. Just
take her away, and see how quickly a change will
take place. Now let us see what the change will be.
Suppose the queen has laid a few eggs in the first
comb built, and we remove her from the hive en-
tirely; the bees will set to work to rear queens from
those eggs, and the other business of the hive will
go on as if nothing unusual had happened; honey
and pollen will be gathered and stored; whatever
eggs or brood may be in the hive are properly cared
for; and all progress finely so long as they have the
means of supplying themselves with a queen. In-
deed it is next to impossible even for the experienced
apiarian to detect anything wrong from outside ap-
pearances; and yet there is no queen to direct them
or instruct them in their duty ; every member of the
22 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
colony, as has already been remarked, knows its
duty, and discharges that duty with alacrity, not wait-
ing for orders from the queen or from each other.
When the yield of honey abroad is good, an in-
creased amount of brood is reared; but when it is
cut off suddenly by frost, or any other casualty, I
have seen them drag the brood, both worker and
drones, in all stages, from the combs, at the same
time killing and driving out the mature drones, as if
a famine was just at hand. Is it the queen that di-
rects this destruction of her offspring? To test the
matter to the satisfaction of any one, just remove the
queen, when such a case occurs, from some strong
stock, and the only perceptible difference will be, that
the one having no queen will retain a portion of
the drones, for the purpose, doubtless, of impregnat-
ing the young queen, should they be successful in
rearing one from eggs in the combs when the queen
is taken away.
The preparation for swarming is, I believe, made
entirely by the workers. The fact is stated by sev-
eral authors, in which I concur, that a guard of
worker bees are placed over the queen cells during
their progress, to prevent the old queen from de-
stroying them, which she would most certainly do if
left to the freedom of her own will, and effectually
prevent any swarm from going forth in a state of
nature, the result of which would be to bring the
whole race to an end ere long. ,
Here we have positive evidence of the workers
governing the queen, and controlling her actions.
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 23
When a top swarm has gone forth, the old queen
accompanying them, leaving embryo queens in the
hive, the guard is continued to prevent the first one
out from rushing to and destroying all her sister
queens, thereby preventing the possibility of any after
swarms going forth. In some instances the young
queens are imprisoned in their cells for days, being
fed through an opening at the end of the cell, by the
workers, until circumstances change so as to make
it proper to release them.
Experiments can easily be instituted by amateurs,
or any one doubting the truth of this, to test it, by
constructing observatory hives, with glass sides, ex-
posing to view the combs and all the workings of
the colony. Directions will be found on another
page for constructing such hives.
Thus we find the worker bees capable of carrying
_on all the affairs of the hive, rearing a queen when
destitute (providing they have eggs), controlling the
queen, and preventing her from destroying the em-
bryo queens; and I will venture the opinion, that they
(the workers) cause her to leave the old hive with the
top swarm ; if left to herself, she would not emigrate
from her old home. This is but an opinion, the truth
of which time and observation will demonstrate.
THE ONLY NECESSITY FOR THE QUEEN IS TO PROVIDE EGGS
FOR THE COLONY.
That the colony is entirely dependent on the queen
for a supply of eggs, few will doubt; but the idea
has generally prevailed that this is not her only
24 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
duty. Cunosity has prompted me to scrutinize this
matter pretty closely, but I have failed to discover
that she performs any other office in the colony ex-
cept the one just indicated. I never could observe
that she had any care for her offspring, either feed-
ing them or manifesting any parental anxiety what-
ever for their welfare; in fact, the workers, as a gen-
eral thing, supply her ladyship with her food, from
time to time, as she requires it.
Mr. Quinby, in referring to the duties of the
queen, says, “‘the queen is the mother of the entire
family; her duty appears to be only to deposit eggs
in the cells. Iam also led to believe that the time
for the queen to lay eggs, and the requisite quantity,
is in a measure indicated by the workers—the kind
of food which they give her, or the quantity of it, as
the case may be. This, I feel quite sure, promotes
the rapid production and depositing of eggs in the
one case, and in the reverse of that a diminution,
even to the entire cessation thereof.” I have already
noticed that the workers have the faculty or power
of rearing a queen from an egg laid in a worker cell,
by giving them a liberal supply of food of a peculiar
kind, the effect of which seems to be the full devel-
opment of the sex, which, if permitted to have re-
mained in the worker cell, and been fed on the com-
mon or ordinary food, it had been a worker, or a
partially developed female. Here we see the pow-
erful effects of stimulating food, for such it doubtless
is. Would it be unreasonable to suppose that food
of a similar kind, given to the perfect queen, would
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 25
greatly affect the production of eggs, either to in-
crease or diminish the quantity ?
That the food consumed by the queen, as a gen-
eral thing, is given to her in a prepared form by the
workers, I have no doubt. The large amount con-
sumed by her, and no doubt necessary for her support
during the time of her greatest activity in depositing
eggs, has been noticed by authors.
It is well known that in a few days after honey be-
comes plenty in the fields, after a scarcity, the queen
invariably becomes very prolific; a sufficient time
apparently elapsing for an increased amount of food
to effect this change. The effect of an increased
amount of honey abroad is about the same on colo-
nies that have a large surplus of honey in store, as it
is on those that have a small supply. Thus we see
it is not caused by actual scarcity or want of honey,
but simply because the workers, in the exercise of
their instinct (knowing the scarcity of honey abroad),
withhold from the queen the amount of food neces-
sary to stimulate her to greater fertility. A proper
knowledge of this peculiarity will enable the apiarian
to stimulate his bees to breed to their full capacity,
by feeding when it is desirable to increase the num-
‘ber of his stocks, or for the purpose of making those
he may have strong and vigorous.
It is well known to apiarians that the quantity of
eggs is regulated in some way or other; but no one,
to my knowledge, has attempted to give the modus
operand. Mr. Langstroth says, ‘some apiarians be-
lieve that she (the queen) can regulate their develop-
2
26 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
ment (eggs), so that few or many are produced, accord-
ing to the necessities of the colony.” That this is
true to a certain extent, seems highly probable; for
if a queen is taken from a feeble colony, her abdo-
men seldom appears greatly distended; and yet, if
put in a strong one, she speedily becomes prolific.
He continues: “I conceive that she has the power
of regulating or repressing the development of her
eggs, so that gradually she can diminish the number
maturing and finally cease laying, and remain inac-
tive as long as circumstances require.”
The old queen appears to qualify herself for ac-
companying a first swarm, by repressing the devel-
opment of eggs; and as this is done. at the most
genial season of the year, it does not seem to be the
result of atmospheric influence. The only difference
upon this point between Mr. Langstroth and myself
is, that he ascribes entirely to the queen the ability
to produce a greater or less amount of eggs, whilst I
believe this matter is regulated entirely by the com-
mon worker bees, by the quantity or quality of food
they give her; or in other words, she is an instru-
ment which they use as they see fit, to supply them
with eggs from which to replenish the hive with
young workers,
NO EGGS ARE DEPOSITED BY THE QUEEN IN QUEEN CELLS.
This may seem paradoxical to some, yet I think
facts will fully confirm this opinion. The inveterate
hostility that exists between queens is well known by
all observing bee-keepers. So fearful are they of a
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 27
rival in the family, that I have known them fre
quently to rush to the queen cells, and if permitted
by the bees, destroy the contents of every one, from
the larva of a day or two old up to those in an ad-
vanced stage; and they are just as ready to do this,
and will do it, if permitted, as certainly, at the
swarming time, as at any other. This I have tested,
by removing the queen from a strong stock, and im-
prisoning her in a queen cage, keeping her in another
hive for a few days, until several queen cells were
commenced, then placing the cage containing her
back in her own hive, where she remained until the
queen cells were advanced to the desired point. I
once kept a queen in a cage in a hive having a fer-
tile queen, for over three weeks, the bees feeding her
all the time. If any one doubts that they (the work-
ers) feed the queen, try this experiment; then set
her at liberty in the hive, when she will immediately
hunt out every cell and destroy it, thus taking the
workers by surprise, as it were, they supposing, per-
haps, that she is still in her prison, and not being
prepared to guard the embryo queens, which they
doubtless intend in part to use for the purpose of
supplying swarms that might go forth, if circum-
stances are favorable. This is on the supposition that
the experiment is instituted in the swarming season.
Bevan relates a circumstance just in point here.
“Tn July, when the hive (one of Dunbar’s mirror
hives) had become filled with comb and bees and well
stored with honey, and when the queen was very
28 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
fertile, I opened the hive and took her majesty away ;
on the next day I observed that they had founded
five royal cells in the usual way, under such cireum-
stances; and in the course of the afternoon four more
were founded on parts of the comb where there were
eggs only a day or two old. Two of the royal cells
advanced more rapidly than the rest, probably from
the larva being of an egg the fittest for the purpose ;
four came on more slowly, and three made no pro-
gress after the third day. On the seventh, the two
first were sealed, two more were nearly so. On the
morning of the fourteenth day from the old queen’s
removal, a young queen, differing in no respect from
une produced in the natural way, emerged from her
cell, and proceeded toward the other royal cell, evi-
dently with a murderous intent. She was jammed.
ately pulled back by the workers with violence, and
this conduct was repeated on their part as often as
the queen renewed her destructive purpose; at every
repulse she appeared sulky, and cried ‘peep,’ ‘peep;’
the unhatched queen responding, but in a somewhat
hoarser tone, owing to her confined situation. This
parley, as Butler calls it, continued for several hours
together, with intervals of about a minute. In the
evening of the same day the second queen was hatch-
ed, or emerged from her cell. I saw her, says Mr. B.,
come forth in majesty, finely and delicately formed,
but smaller than the other.’
Tn this case it is very evident that they designed
one of these queens to go off with a swarm. I
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 29
should perhaps remark, that this experiment was
made in an observatory hive, glass sides—what Bevan
calls a mirror hive.
Suddenly alarm a colony that has its preparations
for swarming nearly completed, i. e. young queens
in an advanced condition, such as are found previous
to the first swarm going forth, so as to withdraw the
attention of the guard of workers from the royal
cells for a time, as a general thing the old queen will
destroy all the embryo queens; she will most cer-
tainly do so, if not prevented by the workers. Does
not this prove very conclusively that the queen of
a colony does not desire any other queen raised
in her domains, for any purpose, and consequently
does not deposit any eggs in the royal cells ?
The workers, when they find it necessary to rear
queens, either for the purpose of supplying the place
of one just taken from them, or for swarming pur-
poses, remove eggs from the worker cells and place
them in the prepared queen cells. I have known
them to do this frequently, wheu I have removed the
queen. Several cells would be built from three-
eighths to half an inch deep, within twenty-four to
forty hours. I have looked into these very fre-
quently, when no egg was to be seen, and noted such
cells carefully, having examined again and again.
Perhaps in a few hours, or during that day or the
next, an egg could be distinctly seen attached to the
top of the cell, nothing else being in the cell; a few
hours afterward a very small quantity of a whitish
substance could be seen surrounding the egg; this
3x
380 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
was greatly increased after the egg was hatched out
and became larva.
This experiment I have tried time and again, with
the same result. There being no queen in the hive,
how came the egg in the queen cell, unless the work-
ers removed it thither? That they did this, I have
no reason to doubt. If they are capable of doing so
in the absence of a queen, is it not reasonable to
suppose that they can do so when preparing to swarm,
while the queen still remains in the hive; and fur-
ther, that this is the method generally practiced.
Sometimes the partitions between two or three cells
were piereed out and formed into a queen cell.
Where there is young larva two or three days old,
such are not removed. Cells constructed in this way
are generally but a few degrees from a horizontal
position; whilst queens raised from the egg almost
invariably occupy a perpendicular position. Query.
Does not this offer a solution to the mystery of drone
laying queens, they having been but imperfectly de-
veloped ?
DO THE WORKER BEES ACCORD ROYAL HONORS TO THE
QUEEN.
I have failed thus far to discover or observe that
any homage was done the queen, unless feeding her
may be considered as such; this I apprehend has
been mistaken for that fond caressing which some
authors laud so highly. When the true state of the
case is understood, it will strip the queen of much of
rovalty with which she has been invested. ‘The guard
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 81
of honor which some authors have accorded her, is
likely to be reduced to a few menials, whose business
it is to prepare her meals and serve them up to her.
When she is passing over the brood-comb, apparently
searching for the proper cells in which to deposit her
eggs, the workers step aside and give her room to
proceed with her work ; just as a man who was stand-
ing idle would step aside to give room to another to
proceed with his work, no homage being done in
vither case, nor yet any filial affection shown.
When I have observed the queen in any other posi-
tion than on the brood comb, she would pass over or
amongst the workers just as any humble worker
might do; very seldom, indeed, do they get out of
her way. She has her peculiar stately, or rather
ambling motion, which serves to distinguish her from
any other in the hive; this is doubtless caused by the
vast amount of food consumed, and the immense
number of eggs elaborated by her when in her great-
est fertility, and not from a knowledge of royal blood
flowing in her veins.
The motions of the young queen before she becomes
fertile, are but little different from the workers; she
is quite brisk and active, either on foot or on the
wing. No notice apparently is taken of her until
she becomes fertile (by the workers); this. fact has
been related by several authors. When she becomes
fertile, and enters upon her duties—as I have stated,
passing over the brood combs, depositing eggs—the
workers simply stepping out of the way, permitting
her to proceed with her labors without hindrance;
32 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
add to this the fact that a few bees prepare and sup-
ply her with food, in connection with the knowledge
or instinct which teaches the bees the necessity for
the presence of the queen, merely for the purpose of
supplying the hive with eggs—and we have all of
royalty or filial affection for the queen by the work-
ers which I have been able to discover. Whenever
she ceases to perform this duty to the satisfaction of
the workers—when from age or accident she becomes
less prolific, ceasing to furnish sufficient eggs to sup-
ply the wants of the colony—how do the workers
proceed? Are they prompted by their filial affection
for their mother, so to speak, to permit her to remain
mistress of the hive, doing the best service her age
or infirmities would permit her to render? Nay;
when this occurs, they rear one or more young queens
(we might suppose, in opposition to her remon-
strances, or perhaps entreaties). When one is in a
fit condition to take her place, she is ignominiously
sacrificed, apparently for the good of the society for
which she is unable longer to furnish the means of
perpetuation. Just as soon as she fails to perform
her appropriate duties, she is dealt with as remorse-
lessly and as promptly by the workers as the drones
are when they cease to be useful to promote the
welfare of the colony; hence the old adage is true,
that in a hive not a single useless idle bee is permitted
to remain.
My object has been to get at facts; I have no
disposition to attempt to underrate the value and the
well known and absolute necessity of the queen; no
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 383
colony can possibly exist more than a few weeks, or
at most a few months, without her; but I deem it
necessary to explain things as experience has taught
me. ,
MODE OF REARING QUEENS,
It has been hinted already, that the worker bees
could rear a queen at will from any egg laid in a
worker cell; this they do when left to take their own
course, or when in a state of nature, in order to pro-
vide queens for swarms that may issue. They also
do this when their queen is removed from the hive
for the purpose of making artificial swarms, or by
any accident, provided they have or are supplied
with brood-comb, containing eggs, or larva not more
than four days old. These are what, for the sake of
distinction, are called artificial queens, but I never
could discover any difference between them and
those raised naturally (or when they are preparing to
swarm—the other queen still remaining in the hive),
when in both cases they commenced with the un-
hatched egg and not with larva.
When the queen is taken from a colony, instinct or
reason, if I may be permitted so to term it, teaches
the workers the importance of having her place
supplied, at the very earliest possible moment, with
another fertile queen. They are also aware, no doubt,
that this desirable object may be attained a few days
sooner, by taking a larva that has been hatched three
or four days, and fed on food only designed to de-
velope it as a common worker up to that time. The
cell is now greatly enlarged, by cutting out the par-
84 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
titions between that and adjoining cells, and rearing
a cell in proper form. The forcing process, so to
speak, is now commenced, by supplying the larva
with a large quantity of royal jelly, instead of the ple-
beian food on which it fed for the first few days of its
existence. Cells constructed for larva of this kind
differ from those constructed for eggs, in two partic-
ulars; in the first place, they are less in size and
nearly horizontal, while those constructed for eggs
are almost invariably perpendicular, so much so that
the embryo queen stands on her head, whilst in the
other case she lies almost flat on her back, similar to
the workers in the embryo state. When quecns
raised from larva have emerged, which I have known
them to do on the twelfth day from the removal of
the old queen, and indeed in one or two instances on
the eleventh day, they are less in size, shorter in the
body, and of a darker color, being of a greenish
brown, very similar to the worker, but destitute of
that rich copper brown which so distinctly marks
the perfect queen raised direct from the egg. I think
it highly probable that to this cause may be traced
the anomaly that has puzzled apiarians for ages past,
i. e. drone-laying queens and fertile workers, each of
which will be noticed elsewhere; and I have no
doubt this peculiarity has misled Mr. Quinby and
many others in their experiments in rearing artificial
queens, as they are generally called.
Tn all cases where it is desirable to have bees rear
queens other than those they rear of their own ac-
cord, comb should be selected having unhatched eggs
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 35
in, and it should invariably be placed in a central
position in the colony, where the highest degree of
temperature is found; in very full, strong stocks,
almost any well covered position with bees will do.
I have generally found that the most perfect and vig-
orous queens are raised in colonies that were capable
of maintaining a uniform temperature in the hive,
above eighty degrees Fahrenheit. According to Be-
van, it requires the temperature to be seventy degrees
and upward to hatch the egg. The influence of tem-
perature is very great in developing all varieties of
the bee, but particularly so with queens. It is quite
easy to place a comb in any movable comb hive
containing eggs, from which several queen cells are
generally suspended, being about an inch long, and
three-eighths of an inch in diameter. When these
cells are built about one-third of their length, being
similar to the cup of an acorn, the egg is placed in
it (as I believe, by the workers), when it hatches and
becomes a worm; it is supplied with royal jelly, m
very small particles at first, and increased as the
worm or larva seems to require it; there is generally
more given or put into the cell than is consumed.
This kind of food is peculiar to the queen cells, and
is not found in any other place in or about the hive.
Royal larva construct only imperfect cocoons, open
behind, and enveloping only the head, thorax and
first ring of the abdomen. A curious circumstance
occurs with respect to the hatching of the queen
bee. When the pupa, or nymph, is about to change
into the perfect insect, the bees render the cover of
36 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
the cell thinner by gnawing away part of the wax,
scooping it out in waved circles at its edges; and
with so much nicety do they perform this operation,
that the cover at last becomes pellucid, owing to its
extreme thinness, thus facilitating the exit of the
queen.
After the transformation is thus completed, the
young queens would generally immediately emerge
from their cells, as workers and drones do; but the
former frequently keep the royal infants prisoners
for some days, supplying them in the mean time with
food through a small opening in the bottom of the
cell, through which the confined queen thrusts her
proboscis to receive it.
In rearing queens to supply queenless hives, or to
supply artificial swarms, I would recommend the apia-
rian to examine carefully, about the seventh or eighth
day from the time eggs were given to the colony,
and one or two cells will usually be found considera-
bly in advance of all the rest. These should be re-
moved. If there are still others left in the hive, they
may be given to colonies; but I do not regard them
as very reliable, sometimes not being fully developed,
having been reared from larva that were too far
advanced as workers. Those reared directly from
the eggs I regard as being superior in point of devel-
opment, and consequently more reliable as prolific
queens. This will be discussed at greater length in
another place. I should remark, however, that the
young queen goes forth from the hive about the
second or third day after she emerges from the cell,
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 37
to meet the drone or male bee in the air, where
coition takes place.
I have already noticed that queens reared from
larva three or four days old, would emerge from their
cells as early as the eleventh or twelfth day from
the time of removing the old queen; whilst those
reared directly from eggs would lack three or four
days of being sufficiently matured to emerge from
the cell, consequently they would be consigned to
certain destruction by the perhaps immature queen
that came out first, unless it should happen in the
swarming season, and the colony designed to swarm.
If later in the season than this, the result would be
about this: the first queen to emerge from her cell,
whether fully developed or not, would destroy all
those yet in their cells within a few hours, and cer-
tainly before she went abroad to meet the drones to
become fertilized; so that she would be the only
dependence of the colony, there being now no eggs
in the hive from which to rear another queen, whether
sufficiently developed to become a mother or not.
But suppose she is not sufficiently developed, as a
queen or female, to have connection with the drone,
and thus become fertilized, but enough so to attempt
the desired object, what would be the probable re-
sult? She would either repeat her excursions abroad,
to meet the drones, day after day, for a considerable
length of time, until she met with some accident that
would terminate her existence; or after a certain time,
as some think, she would commence laying drone
eggs, being incapable of furnishing any other kind.
A
388 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
In one instance, during the past season, I knew a
queen of this kind; she was quite small, being but
little larger than a common worker, and very nearly
of the same color; she emerged from her cell on the
eleventh day from the removal of the queen, and
consequently must have been reared from larva. I
was careful to watch her, and saw her about one
o’clock on the second day, issue from the hive.
I continued my observations, and saw her go forth
five or six different days; she remained in the hive
until about the sixteenth day from the time she
emerged from her cell. No eggs could be found in
any of the combs, neither drone nor worker cells, and
I could not discover any difference in her size or
appearance, as is always the case when queens be-
come fertile. I then removed her and gave another
queen tothe colony. I feel pretty confident that she
was not sufficiently developed to become a prolific
queen, or even to become a mother at all, unless,
indeed, the theory of an unimpregnated queen pro-
ducing only drones, is true. I think it quite reason-
able to suppose that various points of development
may and are occasionally attained, between the com-
mon worker bee and the perfect queen, arising either
from the fact of the larva being too far advanced,
before feeding royal jelly, to be fully developed, or
from being reared in a cool situation or imperfectly
fed.
It is of great importance to place brood-comb con-
taining eggs from which to rear queens, in a central
position in the colony; if put in a hive that has sent
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 89
off a swarm or two, it will not do to put it near the
lower ends of the combs, as there is not likely to be
a sufficient quantity of bees to keep up the heat to
the proper temperature ; and to put combs on the top
of the hive is nonsense. Whoever expects to rear
queens in either way, will be disappointed.
Mr. Quinby has doubtless fallen into one or all of
these errors, which is common to first experiments.
His mode of managing bees, prior to writing his
work, had been such, I apprehend, as not to make
the rearing of artificial queens of much importance
to him as a matter of profit; hence I conclude he has
not given this subject as much study and careful
experiment as some others, whose object has been to
increase their number of stocks in the most rapid
manner possible.
Mr. Quinby says: . “ Obtain a piece of brood-comb
containing workers’ eggs, or larva very young. You
will generally find it without much trouble, in a
young swarm that is making combs; the lower ends
usually contain eggs; take a piece from one of the
middle sheets, two or three inches long; (you will
probably use smoke by this time, without telling.)
Invert the hive that is to receive it, put the piece
edgewise between the combs, if you can spread them
apart enough for the purpose; they will hold it there,
and then there will be ample room to make the cells.
They will nearly always rear several queens. I have
counted nine several times, which were all they had
room for. But yet I have very little confidence in
such queens, they are almost certain to be lost.”
40 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
Again he says: “I have put such piece of brood-
comb in a small glass box on the top of the hive
instead of the bottom, because it was less trouble;
but in this case the eggs were all removed in a short
time; whether a queen was reared in the hive or
not, [cannot say; but this I know, I never obtained
a prolific queen, after repeated experiments in this
way.” He continues: “It would appear that I have
been more unfortunate with queens reared in this
way than most experimenters. I have no difficulty
to get them formed, to all appearance perfect, but
lose them afterward. Now whether this arose from
some lack of physical development, by taking grubs
too far advanced to make a perfect change, or
whether they were reared so late in the season, that
most of the drones were destroyed, and the queen to
meet one had to repeat her excursions till lost, I am
yet unable to fully determine.” . . . ‘“ Yet occasion-
ally prolific queens have been reared when I could
account for their origin in no other way but from
worker eggs.”
These are just the results I would anticipate from
the manner of conducting these experiments; I
should have expected them to be instituted in a more
workman-like manner, at least more in accordance
with the habits of the bee. Mr. Quinby seems rather
in doubt whether bees can and do raise prolific queens
from worker eggs. However, this question is now so
well understood, having been clearly demonstrated
by such authors as Schirach, Februier, Swammerdam,
Huber, Bonner, Bevan, Langstroth and others, that I
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 41
apprehend no reasonable doubt can exist of the truth
of worker bees raising perfect prolific queens from any
eggs that would have produced workers, or of rear-
ing workers from any eggs that would have produced
a queen; for I am fully satisfied that but two kinds
of eggs are ever found in a hive of bees, moth eggs
excepted. The one may be found in drone cells,
which will produce only drones; the other may be
found in the worker cells, and will produce only
females, either partially or fully developed, as circum-
stances may seem to suggest to the instinct of the
bees.
I have adverted to Mr. Quinby’s experiments, and
his position with reference to the rearing of queens
from eggs laid in worker cells, or artificial queens, if
you please, from no unkind motives, or with a view
to detract from his merits as an author, but to ex-
plain, if possible, the cause of his failure, and thereby
prevent others from falling into the same error.
Bevan says: ‘Bees, when deprived of their queen,
have the power of selecting one or more worker
eggs, or grubs, and converting them into queens;
thus showing that there is no inherent difference in
female ova to effect this. Each of the promoted
eggs or grubs has a royal cell or cradle formed for
it, and it is liberally supplied with royal jelly; this
royal jelly is a pungent food, prepared by the work-
ing bees exclusively for the purpose of feeding such
of the larva as are destined to become candidates for
the honors of royalty, whether it be their lot to assume
them or not; it is more stiz.ulating than the food of
4x
42 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
ordinary bees, has not the same mawkish taste, and
is evidently acescent, or acid. From the first, the
royal larva are supplied with it rather profusely, and
there is always some left in the cell after their trans-
formation. It becomes reddish or brown after re-
maining for a time. Schirach, who was secretary
to the Apiarian Society in Upper Lusatia, and vicar
of Little Bautzen, may be regarded as the discoverer
or rather as the promulgator of this fact; and his
experiments, which were also frequently repeated by
other members of the Lusatian society, have been
amply confirmed by those of Huber, Bonner, Dunbar,
Golding, and myself (Bevan). Keys was a violent
skeptic upon this subject, so likewise was John Hun-
ter. But notwithstanding the criticisms and ridicule
of the former, and the sarcastic strictures of the lat-
ter, the sex of workers is now established beyond all
doubt.
“The fact is said to have been known long before
Schirach wrote. M. Vogel, and Signor Monticelli,
a Neapolitan professor, have both asserted this. The
former states it to have been known upward of fifty
years, the latter a much longer period. He says that
the Greeks and Turks in the Ionian islands, are well
acquainted with it, and that in the little Sicilian island
of Favignana, the art of producing queens has been
known from very remote antiquity; he even thinks
it was no secret to the ancient Greeks and Romans.
“Swammerdam was acquainted with the power of
making artificial swarms. But the result of Schi-
rach’s experiments was, that all workers were origin-
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 43
ally females, but that their organs of generation were
obliterated, merely because the germs of them were
not developed, their being fed and treated in a par-
ticular manner in their infancy, in their worm state,
being necessary, in his opinion, to effect that devel-
opment. Subsequent experiments have shown, how-
ever, that the organs are not entirely obliterated ;
they seem to be merely restrained from unfolding
themselves by the size of their cradle and the quality
of their food.
“The most incomprehensible part of the process
is, that increasing the size and changing the direc-
tion of the cell, and feeding the larva with a more
pungent food, should not only allow the sexual or-
gans of the insect to be fully developed, but should
alter the shape of her tongue, her jaws, and her
sting, deprive her of the power to secrete wax, and
obliterate the baskets which, but for the changes
just referred to, would have been formed upon her
thighs.”
Thus we find that this matter was well understood
many years, if not many centuries ago. Any writer
who doubts that bees can and do raise perfect queens
from eggs laid in worker cells, has certainly failed
to acquaint. himself with the standard writers of the
last century, or the first half of the present, or has
failed to test the matter by properly instituted experi-
ments.
I have dwelt at considerable length on this subject,
as I consider it one of the most important connected
with bee-keeping.
44 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
IMPREGNATION OF QUEENS.
Having traced this wonderful insect from the egg
to the perfectly formed virgin queen, giving an ac-
count of various experiments, and the views of differ-
ent authors in regard to the rearing of queens, &c.
I shall now advert to the more intricate and seem-
ingly mysterious process of the impregnation of the
queen.
This is a subject, (as Bevan remarks,) which was
long involved in obscurity, and which indeed is still
clouded by some uncertainty. Schirach and Bon-
ner denied the necessity of sexual intercourse be-
tween the queen and drones, considering the former
a mother and yet a virgin. Swammerdam held the
same opinion; he ascribes the impregnation to a
vivifying seminal aura, which is exhaled from the
drones and penetrates the body of the queen. Reau-
mur successfully combated this fanciful doctrine, and
Huber refuted it by experiment. Reaumur supposed
that there was a sexual intercourse, though his ex.
periments left that question undecided.
Arthur Dobbs, Esq. has given it as his opinion,
that the queen’s eggs were impregnated by coition
with the drones, and that a renewal of the inter-
course was unnecessary; he, however, thought that
she had intercourse with several, in order that there
might be a sufficient deposition of sperm to impreg-
nate all her eggs.
The experiments of Huber were made upon virgin
queens, with whose history he was acquainted from
the moment they left their cells. In the course of his
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 45
experiments he found that the queens were never im-
pregnated as long as they remained in the hive; but
that impregnation always takes place in the open air,
whilst on the wing, at a time when the heat and
brightness of the day have induced the drones in
large quantities to issue from the hives, on which oc-
casion the queen soars high in the air, love being the
motive for the only distant journey she ever takes.
“The rencontre and copulation of the queen with
the drone takes place exterior to the hive,” says
Lombard, “and whilst they are on the wing. They
are constituted in a similar manner with the family
of flies. The dragon flies copulate as they fly through
the air, in which state they have the appearance of
a double insect.”
Bevan says: “I was myself an eye witness of the
following circumstances of the humble bee. A con-
joined pair descended obliquely and rapidly through
the air, making a loud buzz, and alighted near me. I
placed a tumbler glass over them, and observed their
proceedings for about twenty minutes, when they
became disunited, but with considerable difficulty,
and not without an angry scuffle. Having kept them
together for two days, feeding them occasionally, I
could not perceive any further advances on either
side, but rather aversion. At the end of this time
the drone, or male, died, but the queen, or female,
lived, and appeared lively for many days; when I
finally gave her her liberty, she flew gaily away.”
This occurrence of Bevan’s proves very clearly that
the humble bee is impregnated on the wing. It is
46 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
well known, also, that the nest is begun in the spring
by a single bee, which is fertile and capable of laying
eggs, from which a brood is raised, and ere long
quite a colony is found. The same phenomenon
occurs with hornets, yellow jackets and wasps, all of
which are closely allied to the honey bee. It is quite
evident that the queen, or the female, which starts
the nest and deposits the first eggs, has been im-
pregnated the fall previous, and when once fertile it
serves for life.
But to return to the honey bee. If the queen
should be confined to the hive, even amidst a seraglio
of drones, she would continue barren; but she usually
takes her flight about the second or third day after
leaving the cell, commonly from twelve to two
o’clock, generally preceded by the drones. After
traversing the alighting board for a few moments,
she flies back and forth in front of the hive, until
reaching the top of the covering or shed, when she
describes small circles at first, gradually enlarging ;
after thus surveying her locality, and noting carefully
the surrounding objects (apparently for the purpose
of enabling her to reach home when she would make
her final excursion), she returns to the hive, again
alighting and traversing the alighting board, passing
into the hive and out again in front, when finally she
rises aloft in the air, describing in her flight hori-
zontal circles of considerable and gradually increasing
diameter, and soars at last to such a height as to
render it impossible to follow her movements. She
generally returns from her aerial excursion in about
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 47
half an hour, with the unmistakable marks of her
amours upon her. Excursions are sometimes made
for a shorter period, but she seldom exhibits signs of
being impregnated after these.
According to Huber, one impregnation is sufficient
to fertilize all the eggs that are laid for two years
afterward, and perhaps sufficient to fertilize all that
she lays during her whole life. This may seem in-
credible to many; but need not, when we consider
that in the common spider, according to Audibert,
the fertilizing effects continue for many years.
Impregnation in insects appears to take place
whilst the eggs pass a reservoir containing sperm,
situated near the termination of the oviduct in the
valve., ‘In dissecting the female parts in the silk
moth,” says Mr. Hunter, “I discovered a bag lying
in what may be called the vagina or common oviduct,
whose mouth or opening was external, but it had a
canal of communication between it and the oviduct.
In dissecting these parts before copulation, I found
this bag empty; and when I dissected them after-
ward, I found it full.” By the most decisive ex-
periments, such as covering the ova of the unimpreg-
nated moth after exclusion, with the liquor taken
from this bag, found in those which were known to
have had sexual connection, rendering them fertile,
he demonstrated that this bag was a reservoir for the
spermatic fluid, to impregnate the eggs as they were
ready for exclusion, and that coition apd impreg-
nation were not simultaneous.
Linnezus thought there was a sexual intercourse
48 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
between the queens and the drones; and he even
suspected that it proved fatal to the latter. Swam-
merdam gives, in his “Researches in Entomology,”
during the latter part of the seventeenth century, a
minute drawing of the ovaries of the queen, greatly
magnified, which shows a small bag or sac lying in
the vagina or common oviduct, very similar to that
found by Mr. Hunter in the silk moth. I think it
reasonable to suppose that this sac is the receptacle
for the male sperm, which serves to fertilize all the
eggs which the queen may produce for life.
Thus far, I believe this theory to be correct; but
the process by which this is brought in contact and
incorporated with the rudiments of the eggs as pro-
duced in the ovaries of the queen, is yet, I apprehend,
considerably in the dark.
Before entering upon this point, I will relate what
occurred under my own observation, in regard to the
impregnation of the queen. On the 25th of May,
1859, I observed a young queen (on the third day
after she emerged from her cell,) leave the hive about
half past twelve o’clock; the drones were abroad in
advance of her, buzzing around in every direction
through the air. I watched carefully for her return,
contracting the entrance a little to prevent her pass-
ing directly in. In about twenty-five minutes she
returned, with the unmistakable marks of coition;
her appearance was similar to that presented by a
worker bee when pressed between the thumb and
fingers, until the intestines, or the whitish substance
which surrounds and is connected with the sting, pro-
MWISTORY AND PHYSIOLOUY. 49
trudes a little beyond the surrounding surface, pro-
ducing an enlargement of the parts, giving her the
appearance of being wounded or pressed suflicient to
cause the protrusion. On the second day, about three
o'clock, I examined the combs, and found eggs in
one comb (worker cells), in a circle, the diameter of
which was about four inches; they were on both
sides of the comb. With a little more care I could
have ascertained nearly the exact time that elapsed
between the coition of the queen and depositing of
eggs,
I would suggest this method to my friend, Mr.
Quinby, as a solution of the questions he would like
to ask, on page 251 of his work.
Since that time, I have seen three other queens
return from their excursions, with the same peculiar
appearance, and in every case eggs could be found in
the combs within two or three days. On other occa-
sious, I have seen queens return to the hive as trim
and nice as when they went forth, without any change
in their appearance, being unsuccessful, no doubt, in
their amours; no eggs could be found, as in the for-
mer cases. From these and other observations, I
feel assured that the queen has connection with the
drone on the wing, and that by close observation on
her rettirn to the hive, her success or failure can be
very easily detected, and the time of her laying eggs
predicted with great certainty by the apiarian.
This part of the business can be more readily seen
and comprehended, than how the eggs yet unformed
are affected by this impregnation.
5
50 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
I have already stated that the queen is provided
with a small receptacle to receive and contain the
vivifying sperm obtained from the drone by coition.
The great mystery to be solved is, how does the queen
draw upon this store of fluid, from time to time, to
fertilize the eggs which are generated in her ovaries?
Does this fluid come in contact and become incor-
porated and combined with the juices or fluids pecu-
liar to the queen, and of which doubtless the eggs
are composed in a great measure? Is it in this man-
ner that the future sex of her offspring is deter-
mined? Or is it only necessary for the egg (after it
is complete in all its parts,) to come in contact with
the mouth or opening of this sperm receptacle, and
thereby receive a sufficient portion to cause them to
procreate? And is it true that the female, or queen,
is of herself, without being impregnated by the
drone, capable of depositing eggs that will produce
only drones or males, perfect in all respects, and yet
impregnation is absolutely required to produce the
female?
That this is true, permit me at present to doubt;
its assumptions are too extravagant, and so far from
harmonizing with all animated nature with which I
am in any way conversant, that I am led to believe
further observation and closer investigation will be
necessary to fully demonstrate the true state of facts,
and solve the mystery that yet surrounds this ques-
tion. It is true, there are strong arguments in favor
of this theory as well as against it, and further ex-
periments may prove it to be correet; yet there are
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 51
some serious difficulties in the way, that to me, at
least, seem hard to reconcile.
Langstroth has elucidated this mystery, and no
doubt made it very plain and satisfactory to himself,
at least; but a very few stubborn facts sometimes de-
stroy the most beautifully drawn theories.
Dzierzon asserts that all impregnated eggs produce
females, either workers or queens; and all unim-
pregnated ones, males or drones. He also states,
that in several of his hives he found drone-laying
queens, whose wings were so imperfect that they
were unable to fly, and which on examination, prov-
ed to be unfecundated. (Query. How did he ascer-
tain that fact ?) Hence he concludes that the eggs laid
by the queen bee and fertile worker had from the
previous impregnation of the egg from which they
sprung, sufficient vitality to produce the drone, which
is a less highly organized insect than the queen or
worker.
This argument is far fetched, and not well found-
ed. Impregnation is, I think, essential to produce
either male or female. THe continues: “It had long
been known that the queen deposits drone eggs in
the large or drone cells, and worker eggs in the small
or worker cells, and that she makes no mistakes.”
And he infers, therefore, that there was some way in
which she was able to decide the sex-of the egg be-
fore it was laid, and that she must have such a con-
trol over the mouth of the seminal sac as to be able
to extrude her eggs, allowing them at will to receive
or not a portion of its fertilizing contents. In this
52 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
way he thought she determined their sex according
to the size of the cells in which she laid them.
I think it highly probable that the queen under-
stands quite well, that when she deposits an egg in
a drone cell it will bring forth a drone, and if in a
worker cell it will bring forth a worker. That she
does know when it is proper to deposit eggs in drone
cells preparatory to swarming in the spring, is at-
tested by all observing apiarians. Who ever saw
eggs laid in drone cells in midwinter, or early in the
spring, until nearly the time for swarming? Yet it
is well known that all strong stocks commence to
breed early in January (if, indeed, they ever cease
entirely); and as the cold weather recedes the quan-
tity is increased. In the latter part of March and
through April, a very considerable quantity of brood
may be found in all strong stocks in this latitude,
42 degrees (of course this will vary with different
latitudes); and yet not a single drone can be found
in any condition, from the egg to the perfect insect.
I have cut holes in a worker brood-comb, and in-
serted corresponding pieces of drone-comb, which
they (the workers) would fasten and adjust very
nicely, giving the appearance of drone cells inter-
mixed with worker cells, and had all the worker
cells around these drone cells filled with brood, but
they remained empty; sometimes a little honey
might be seen in them, as if stored there for imme-
diate use. Again I have seen combs that were built
irregular or in detached pieces; of these perhaps a
piece of drone comb would be in a central position,
HISTORY AND PHYSTOLOGY, os
and toward the latter part of April would be sur-
rounded on three sides by young worker brood, yet
not asingle egg or young drone could be found in
the drone cells.
Some of my readers will perhaps say that the
queen laid eggs in all the cells in the comb indis-
criminately, in drone as well as worker cells; but that
the workers would remove them from drone cells. To
those who hold this opinion I would say, try the ex-
periment, by preparing an observatory hive, and
watch the queen when depositing eggs; and if you
see her depositing a single egg in drone cells, al-
though you may have them interspersed all through
and amongst the worker cells, prior to the time of
the general, and I might say simultaneous laying of
drone eggs, preparatory to swarming, I will present:
you with a copy of this work, gratis.
If it is true that the workers remove eggs from
the drone cells and destroy them, as some may sup-
pose, until the proper time arrives for rearing drones,
it is another strong fact in support of the worker
bees controlling the entire economy of the hive. But
when the proper season arrives for the great laying
of drone eggs, as Bevan calls it, which is generally
the last of April or first of May, drone eggs may be
found simultaneously in all strong stocks that are or
have been similarly situated; this will be varied by
the weather and by the yield of honey. That the
queen understands when the proper time arrives for
rearing drones, and that no drone eggs are laid prior
5*
54 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
to that time, I have not the slightest doubt; whether
this is caused by the peculiarity of the food given
her, or from sume other cause, I am yet undecided.
But that she can fully control the producing and the
laying of eggs to generate workers, when it is best.
so to do, withholding for a time, and when the proper
time arrives, laying eggs to produce drones or males,
is quite certain. Hence I conclude that if she can
control the laying of drone eggs in the spring of the
year, she can contro] it in the summer, or at any
season; in short, that the queen knows the sex be-
fore depositing the egg in the cell, and never makes
any mistakes.
If the theory is correct that the sex of the future
bee is decided simply by a mechanical operation,
caused by the pressure upon the abdomen of the
queen, in the act of depositing an egg in a worker
cell, thereby forcing a sufficient portion of the male
sperm out upon the egg during its passage to fertil-
jze it, and cause it to be a female or a worker; and
in depositing an egg in a drone cell, it being so much
larger, no pressure occurs, and sonaquently it will
be a canes the queen having no special knowledge
or will on the subject; how does it happen that no
drone eggs are found prior to a certain time in the
season? If this speculation is correct, then the
queen would deposit eggs at any season of the year
in drone eclls, where, intermixed with worker cells
in the same comb presenting an unbroken surface,
drones would be reared at all seasons, if any brood
IIISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 55
was reared at all; but this not being the case, is
very strong evidence that the theory is at fault, in
fact, that it is not true in any sense.
LANGSTROTH’S THEORY.
Langstroth says: “My friend, Mr. Samuel Wag-
oner, has advanced a highly ingenious theory, which
accounts for all the facts, without admitting that the
queen has any special knowledge or will on the sub-
ject. He supposes that when she deposits her eggs
in the worker cells, her body is slightly compressed
by their size, thus causing the eggs, as they pass the
spermatheca, to receive its vivifying influence. On
the contrary, when she is laying in drone cells, as
this compression cannot take place, the mouth of the
spermatheca is kept closed, and the eggs are neces-
sarily unfecundated, producing only drones, &c.”
This is a very plausible theory, indeed, and in the
absence of positive evidence pro or con, it might as
well be received (for Buncomb). Yet I must say, I
have no faith init. Facts, and further experience and
observation, will, I apprehend, demonstrate its fallacy.
The seminal sac, as shown by the drawing of the
ovaries of the queen, highly magnified, in Lang-
stroth’s work, is near the terminus or outer end of
the oviduct, consequently very near the hinder part
of the queen; now compare the size of this part of
the body of the queen with the size of the worker
cells, and we find that the particular part where this
sac is located could be thrust. to the bottom of the cell
without coming in contact with its sides. No pressure
o
56 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
could occur until about two-thirds of the abdomen,
or the parts behind the thorax, were thrust in ; thus
whatever pressure might occur, would be at a point
some distance from where this sac is located, and
would not necessarily influence it in any respect; in
fact no pressure could occur by this process on the
part where this seminal sac is located, if the anat-
omy of the queen is properly illustrated by Lang-
stroth’s microscopic view.
There is another fact, however, in the practice of
the queen, which, I presume, has been noticed by all
apiarians, and is sufficient to show this theory to be
incorrect. When a top-swarm, that has the old queen
with them, is put in a hive, they immediately com-
mence building combs, generally worker cells; the
queen follows them and deposits eggs in the cells,
when the foundation is laid and the side walls of the
cells are not more than one-sixteenth, and certainly
not more than one-eighth of an inch high. Is it
possible that the abdomen of the queen receives any
pressure from the sides of the cells whilst in the act
of thrusting her ovipositor into the cell to deposit the
egg? Is it probable she would receive any greater
pressure, in any possible contingency, in depositing
eggs in worker cells than in drone cells, when neither
of them is more than one-eighth of an inch deep?
Eggs are frequently thus deposited, both in worker
and drone cells, the bees continuing to rear the cells
until of the proper length. Such a theory is, in my
opinion, simply absurd, but well calculated to amuse
the ignorant and unobserving.
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 57
At present I shall content myself with believing,
that a sufficient portion of the seminal fluid to cause
the egg to generate is incorporated with it in its for-
mation. The eggs to produce drones or males, are
generated in or produced from the one side or branch
of the ovaries, and those producing females from the
other side. We find that the ovaries are separated
into two equal parts (according to Swammerdam,
after whom Langstroth copies), having no connec-
tion whatever, except that the contents of each
branch is discharged through the common oviduct
or passage. Over the outlets of the passages or ovi-
ducts opening from each of these divisions into the
main channel or common oviduct, the queen has full
control, and fully understands that eggs from the one
division will produce drones and from the other,
workers ; and the anomaly of drone-laying queens
arises from the imperfect development of that part
of the ovaries which produce eggs for workers. This
hypothesis may be incorrect, but I trust careful ex-
periment will be instituted by various apiarians, that
the truth may be fully and fairly demonstrated.
THE WORKER BEE,
The working or common bees are so
often seen, and have become so familiar
to almost every one, that a particular de-
scription may almost appear unneces-
sary; yet for the sake of uniformity, I
shall give it, very briefly.
They are less in size than either the queen or
THE WORKER.
53 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
drones, and the name they have so justly obtained,
of working bees, clearly denotes their superior in-
dustry in laboring for the whole colony. It is now
generally admitted that they are females, whose ova-
ries are not sufficiently developed to enable them to
become mothers; yet they most undoubtedly possess
all the maternal affection and care for the young
of the colony, nursing them, so to speak, and sup-
plying all their wants; in time of threatened danger
they will cling to them, and risk their lives to protect
them, as devotedly.as any mother could do for her
own offspring.
I have never ascertained how many bees are re-
quired to constitute what is generally called a good
swarm, but authors estimate the number at from
fifteen to thirty thousand workers; this, of course,
will be varied very much by the season and other cir-
cumstances. This estimate would, perhaps, apply to
top-swarms from good sized hives. Bonner says that
about five thousand workers weigh a pound; if this
estimate is correct, it would be easy, on hiving a
swarm, to ascertain its numbers, by first weighing
the hive and afterward both hive and swarm.
DESCRIPTION OF THE WORKER.
The common worker bee, as well as the other two
varieties of that valuable insect, consists of three
parts. The head, which is attached to the thorax by
a slender kind of neck; there are two eyes placed
in the head, of an oblong figure, dark brown or
nearly black, transparent and immovable; the mouth
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 59
or jaws, like those of some species of fish, open to
the right and left, and serve instead of hands to carry
out of the hive whatever incumbers or offends them ;
they are also provided with a proboscis or trunk, with
which they suck up honey or any other desired sub-
stance, and again deposit it in the combs; it is used
at times as a trowel in building combs, placing with
it the minute scales of wax in their appropriate
places, and giving the desired polish to the cells. The
thorax, or middle part between the head and the ab-
domen, which is nearly separated from the latter by
an insection or division, connected by a very narrow
neck or junction; to this four wings, a pair on each
side, are attached, by which they are not only enabled
to fly with heavy loads, but also to make those well
known sounds by which they doubtless communicate
with each other, serving as a kind of speech. They
have also six legs, three on each side; the foremost
pair of these is the shortest—with these they unload
the little pellets from the baskets on their thighs;
the middle pair is somewhat longer, and the hind-
most pair longest of all; on the outside of the
middle joint of these last there is a small cavity, in
the form of what a Scotchman would call a marrow
spoon, by some it is called a basket, in which they
collect those loads of pollen which are frequently
seen going into the hive, and by many supposed to
be wax. This basket or hollow groove in the thigh
is peculiar to the worker; neither queen nor drone
has any thing of the kind. The belly is composed
of six rings or folds, and contains, besides the intes-
60 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
tines of the insect, the honey sac or bladder, the
poison sac and the sting. The honey sac is a reser-
voir into which is deposited the honey the bee sips
from the flowers, passing it through the proboscis
and the narrow pipes leading directly to the honey
sac; when full it is the size of a small pea, and so
transparent that the color of the honey can be dis-
tinguished through it; this sac is provided with a
set of muscles, by which it is compressed at will.
enabling the bee to empty it into the cells. When
they get honey in large quantities, and are engaged
filling this sac, the rings of the abdomen have a vibra-
tory motion, similar to pumping; the sac is entirely
separate from the stomach.
Every worker is armed and equipped for war, both
offensive and defensive; their sting is a small but
very effective weapon. Many men would flee from
an attack by such weapons, who would scorn to turn
their backs upon the bristling bayonet or the death-
dealing cannon’s mouth. The sting is provided with
minute but very powerful muscles, by means of which
the bee can dart it out with force sufficient to pene-
trate through the thick skin of a man’s hand. In
length it is about the sixth part of an inch, largest at
the root, tapering gradually toward the point, which
is extremely small andsharp. When examined with
a microscope, it appears to be polished extremely
smooth, being composed of a horny substance. It is
hollow within, like a tube, through which the poison
flows when a wound is inflicted. The point of the
sting is barbed, so that it is quite impossible for the
HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 61
~ bee to withdraw it from the wound, but the act of
stinging any animal is generally fatal to itself, tearing
out, as it were, a part of the entrails with the sting.
These workers may be said to compose the whole
community, except in the season of the drones, which
hardly lasts four months; during the rest of the year
there are no others found in the hive than workers
and the queen. The whole labor of the hive is per-
formed by them; they build the combs, collect the
honey, bring it home, and store it up in their waxen
magazines; they take charge of the eggs deposited
by the queen, and rear therefrom queens, worker
bees and drones; they remove all incumbrances from
the hives, and defend the community against the
attack and encroachments of enemies; they also kill
or drive out the drones when their services are no
longer necessary: in short, the workers undertake
and accomplish everything that is necessary to the
welfare of the entire colony, except furnishing eggs
to replenish the hive with a succession of young ones
to take the place of the superannuated.
THE DRONE.
The drones are a species of bees
well known; in fact so distinctive is
the name, that it is frequently applied
to designate a certain class of man-
kind. The drone can easily be dis-
tinguished from the worker bee by
its greater bulk and clumsy, uncouth
appearance; it is both thicker and longer; its head
6
THE DRONE.
62 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
is round, eggs full, and tongue or proboscis short ;
the form of the abdomen or belly is quite different
from both queen and worker, the organs of generation
being located in the drone where the sting is found
in the worker. It makes a much coarser and more
boisterous noise when flying, a peculiarity of itself
sufficient to recognize it.
The drone is now admitted by all writers to be the
male bee. the latitude and circumstances, such as have just
been referred to. In California the swarming season
usually commences early in April; some seasons a
few swarms come off in the latter part of March, but
this is the exception, not the rule. First swarms
frequently fill up their hive and send off one or
more swarms the same season; but even there they
are governed by the yield of honey, kind of weather,
&c. the same as here.
All the principal bee-keepers in California have
adopted artificial swarming, and seem to prefer it
to natural swarming for increasing their stocks, as
being more certain and profitable in its results. It
is to the interest of bee-keepers to investigate the
matter closely, and compare the results of the two
systems, in order to adopt the best. Where bees sell
readily at one hundred dollars per hive (as has been
NATURAL SWARMING. 189
the case ever since bees were introduced into Cali-
fornia), the difference of a hive or two, more or less,
is quite an important item; hence the decision and
the experience of the California apiarians upon this
point is worthy of serious and careful consideration
by all who are or expect to be engaged in bee-keep-
ing. Where dollars and cents in such large quan-
tities are so temptingly arrayed before the skillful
importers, propagators and dealers in bees, it is very
safe to conclude that the shortest road to wealth will
be adopted by the majority; the most certain and
expeditious method of increasing bees, and keeping
them in the most flourishing condition, will be sought
out and practiced; and all prejudice and fanciful
ideas will be laid aside for the purpose of acquiring
the mighty dollar.
I think facts justify me in supposing that greater
advances have been made by the California bee-
keepers, within the last three years, to acquire and
perfect a thoroughly practical and reliable system for
the management of bees, to obtain the greatest in-
crease of stocks and the largest yield of surplus honey
in any given period of time, than has been made in
all the other States of the Union during the last half
century. This may seem somewhat paradoxical; if
so, just reflect for a moment that bees at one hundred
dollars per colony, and honey at one dollar per pound,
is a great temptation to seek for knowledge in bee-
keeping; in fact, it has been sought with greater
assiduity than the world has ever before seen in
apiarian science.
190 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
CAUSE OF SWARMING.
Authors do not agree as to the cause of bees
swarming. Some suppose it to be for want of room,
others think they swarm to avoid the conflicts of
the queen, whilst yet others advocate still different
theories ; but all such theories, I apprehend, are at
fault. I have ever believed swarming to be in strict
accordance with the fiat of the Almighty maker of
the universe, who said, “Go forth and multiply, and
replenish the earth.” Iam far from supposing it to
be the result of any forced or unnatural cause, but as
simply the instinct given them asa means of extend-
ing and perpetuating their species; in fact, in a state
of nature it could not possibly be dispensed with;
without this means of reproduction the species would
soon become extinct.
CONDITION OF THINGS NECESSARY FOR SWARMING.
When stocks are strong, the bees cluster to the
bottom of the combs, and sometimes on the outside.
It is necessary there should be a good supply of honey
abroad in the fields. A top swarm need never be
expected when there is a scarcity of honey. Nature
has taught them the danger and folly of attempting
to emigrate, and set up house-keeping in a new place,
without the assurance of obtaining a fair supply of
provision ; indeed, so generally do they observe this
precautions, that it almost amounts to the power of
reasoning. Warm weather is also necessary for their
coming forth. I have frequently known them to
swarm when the sun was partially obscured by clouds,
NATURAL SWARMING. 191
the atmosphere being warm and fine; in fact, I have
thought that a warm day with occasional showers,
the sun shining brightly at intervals, is a favorite
time for swarms to come off. They seldom attempt
to swarm when it is cool and windy.
Bonner, who isa very reliable author, remarks on
this point: “Some swarms will lie out long before
they swarm, though they will swarm at last; others,
although they lie out equally long, will not swarm at
all; a third class will swarm without the smallest
previous appearance, and a fourth will make a bustle
about their doors for three or four days before they
swarm ; and therefore, from such a variety of chances,
it is scarcely possible to determine the precise time
of swarming, especially by young beginners in bee-
husbandry. A constant attendance is necessary in
swarming time, from eight o’clock in the morning
until about three or four in the afternoon; and this
needs only to be done in fine warm days, as the bees
seldom send out a colony in cold or chilly weather.”’
But this is not all that 1s necessary. Embryo
queens are always in a state of forwardness to supply
the old hive, as the old queen invariably leaves with
the first swarm, and to provide queens for any after-
swarms. I cannot better describe the process than
by quoting from the “ Mysteries of Bee-keeping,” by
Mr. Quinby, who is good authority on this point:
REQUISITES BEFORE PREPARATIONS OF QUEEN CELLS.
“JT have found the process for all regular swarms
something like this: Before they commence, two or
192 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
three things are requisite. The combs must be
crowded with bees; they must contain a numerous
brood advancing from the egg to maturity; the bees
must be obtaining honey, either by being fed or from
flowers. Being crowded with bees in a scarce time
of honey is insufficient to bring out the swarm,
neither is an abundance sufficient, without the bees
and the brood. The period that all these requisites
happen together, and remain long enough, will vary
with different stocks, and many times do not happen
at all through the season, with some.
“These causes then appear to produce a few queen
cells, generally begun before the hive is filled.”
STATE OF QUEEN CELLS WHEN USED. +
“They are about half finished, when they receive
the eggs; as these eggs hatch into larva, others are
begun, and receive eggs at different periods for sey-
eral days later. The number of such cells seem to
be governed by the prosperity of the bees; when the
family is numerous and the yield of honey abundant,
they may amount to twenty, at other times perhaps
not more than two or three; although several such
cells may remain empty. I have already said that a
failure (or even a partial one,) in the yield of honey
at any time from the depositing of the royal eggs till
the sealing of the cells (which is about ten days),
would be likely to bring about their destruction.
Even after being sealed, I have found a few instances
where they were destroyed.”
NATURAL SWARMING. 193
STATE WHEN SWARMS ISSUE.
“ But when there is nothing precarious about the
honey, the sealing of these cclls is the time to expect
the first swarm, which will generally issue the first
fuir day after one or more are finished. I never
missed a prediction for a swarm forty-eight hours,
when I have judged from these sigus, in a prosperous
season. When there is a partial failure of honey,
the swarm sometimes will wait several days after
finishing them.”
The surest plan is to occasionally examine-the con-
dition of the qucen cells, about the time swarms are
expected. This is readily accomplished in our im-
proved movable comb hives, by simply lifting out
the frames containing the combs; but it can be done
in any kind of box hive or gum, by first blowing
smoke under the hive; when the bees are driven
back a little, invert it, repeating the smoking opera-
tion occasionally, to drive the bees from the lower
ends of the combs, where the queen cells are usually
found. These cells are of an oblong circular form,
of considerable thickness, and in appearance rather
clumsy; when half made they are not unlike the
lower part of an acorn turned upside down; they are
gradually lengthened as the royal larva increases in
size, and when finished and sealed up, which, as Mr.
Quinby states, is about ten days from the egg, are
about an inch in length and resemble the end of
one’s little finger, minus the nail, and are generally
suspended in a perpendicular form from the comb.
When queen cells are thus prepared watch your bees
17
194 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
carefully, as without a change of weather a swarm
will issue ere long.
OTHER SYMPTOMS IMMEDIATEAY PRECEDING THE
ISSUING OF A SWARM.
If, when the foregoing preparations are made, in
the morning of a warm, calm day, you observe one
or more strong stocks in the apiary, from which few
bees are going forth to the fields in search of honey,
whilst other colonies are busily at work, it is a pretty
strong symptom of swarming during the day. Ob-
servations I have made lead me to think, that the
cause of this seeming inactivity is, that they are en-
gaged in the interior of the hive taking in provisions,
simply packing their trunks for the voyage ; as most
authors agree that they fill their sacs with honey
before the swarm issues. Here, again, their instinct
amounts almost to the point of reasoning, for in case
of a delay in finding a suitable home to shelter them,
or if a sudden change in the weather should occur
soon after it was safely lodged in its new home, so
as to prevent them from going forth to gather the
needed supplies from the flowers, starvation and the
utter destruction of the swarm would be the result;
hence the importance of taking a supply of provi-
sions before emigrating.
Another indication is the generally excited appear-
ance of the bees about the entrance of the hive,
running to and fro in every direction ; some reeling
around in small circles in front and above the hive,
apparently anxious for the important event to take
NATURAL SWARMING. 195
place, when suddenly the advance guard rushes forth
with hurried steps, immediately taking wing and
mounting into the air, making a sharp, shrill sound,
which can easily be distinguished from those engaged
in their usual labor; when, hark! the joyful cry is
raised by those on watch: The bees are swarming!
which generally produces as much excitement in the
bee-keeper’s family as I have described as occurring
in the bee family.
THE MODUS OPERANDI OF SWARMING.
It has already been remarked, that a column or
stream of bees rushes forth with the utmost precipi-
tation. I have on several occasions carefully observed
during this process, to see if the queen leads the
swarm, or is the first to leave the hive, as many
authors have led us to believe, but am satisfied this
is not correct. At various times I observed her
majesty come out of the hive greatly excited, and run
around on the alighting board, or on the side of the
hive, and again pass into the hive, apparently bewil-
dered, or being fearful of taking wing; in a few
moments she would again make her appearance out-
side of the hive. During all this time the bees were
rushing out and taking wing with the greatest fury,
until the air for a considerable space around and
above the hive was completely filled with bees, cir-
cling around in every direction. This operation was
repeated several times before she took wing, by which
time most of the swarm had left, and instead of the
queen being the first to leave, she was almost the
196 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
last. On one or two occasions I saw her drop down
to the ground, on weeds or grass in front of the hive,
seemingly unable to mount up into the air, where,
if left to herself, she would most likely have perished,
had the returning swarm not discovered her, wlen
they immediately commenced clustering around her.
In the year 1855, one of our stocks sent forth a
swarm, which, after circling around for some time,
returned again to the hive from whence it came. It
repeated this operation the nextday. I happened to
be some distance from the apiary each time the
swarm was rapidly returning. When I arrived, I ex-
amined carefully in front of the hive until I felt
pretty certain the queen had not dropt down on her
first attempt to fly ; hence I concluded she remained
in the hive, and suspected that from some cause she
was unable to fly. To satisfy myself upon this point,
I determined to watch the next day about the time
they were likely to make the third attempt. I had
but a short time to wait until the swarm again began
rushing out. After watching for a few moments, a
large portion of the swarm having gone forth, the
queen came rushing out, first running up the side of
the hive, then down and around on the alighting
board, in front of the hive, to and fro, very much
excited, but made no attempt to fly. I at once
discovered one of her wings was deficient. Mean-
while the bees kept rushing out as though their very
lives depended on their speed, apparently unconscious
of the presence of the queen; in fact, in their hurry
they passed over and around her with the same indif-
NATURAL SWARMING. 197
ference they would if she had been any other object
of a similar size. I now lifted the hive from its
stand, sct it a little to one side, and put the new
hive in which I designed putting the swarm, in its
place, still keeping my eye on the motions of the
queen, who was running around on the alighting
board, where a number of bees remained. In a few
minutes the swarm began to return to their old home,
as they supposed, having discovered, no doubt, that
their queen was not with them; they immediately
commenced entering the new hive, in company with
the queen, rejoicing at finding her and a new home
at the same time. In a few minutes the swarm
had nearly all entered the hive, when I removed
it to a new stand and set the old hive back in its
place again, when all seemed prosperous and happy.
Since that time I have twice had occasion to repeat
this experiment, with similar results. From these
and other facts which will be noticed in their proper
place, I conclude that the queen, although absolutely
necessary to the welfare of the swarm, is very far
from leading and directing it with that pomp and
queenly authority that has been so graphically de-
scribed and dwelt upon by some authors; but on the
contrary, facts justify me in believing that in swarm-
ing, as in many other things, the queen is governed
or prompted to do or not to do certain things, by the
common worker bees. This, I am aware, is assuming
new ground, and contrary to the opinion of all authors
IT have consulted; hence I ask a careful examination
upon this point.
1T*
198 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING.
Bonner, in describing the process of swarming,
says: ‘ Nothing can surely be more delightful to the
bee-master than to behold the young emigrants flying
in the air and darkening the sky with a thousand
varying lines, passing hither and thither in every
direction.” Itis, indeed, surprising to see the young
colony leaving their mother hive, deserting it in the
utmost hurry and precipitation, insomuch that they
can hardly clear the way for each other.
(288)