hee Amaro PH ieee cen erent Gift of Lyman C. Root Formerly owned ty, Moses ALBERT R. MANN Quinb LIBRARY New York STATE COLLEGES OF AGRICULTURE AND HoME ECONOMICS AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY EVERETT FRANKLIN PHILLIPS BEEKEEPING LIBRARY kK iM af Cornell University The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924003214883 Cornell University Library SF 523.H256 Bees and b keeping: a plain, practical UL 3 1924 003 214 883 nama BEES AND BEE-KEEPING: A PLAIN, PRACTICAL WORK; RESULTING FROM YEARS OF EXPERIENCE AND CLOSE OBSERVATION IN EXTENSIVE APIARIES, BOTH IN PENNSYLVANIA AND CALIFORNIA, WITH DIRECTIONS HOW 10 MAKE BEB-KERPING A DESIRABLE AND LUCRATIVE BUSINESS, AND FOR SHIPPING BEES TO CALIFORNIA. BY W. CO. HARBISON, PRACTICAL APIARIAN, NEW YORK: C. M. SAXTON, BARKER & CO. AGRICULTURAL BOOK PUBLISHERS, No. 25 PARK ROW. 1860. BEES AND BEE-KEEPING: A PLAIN, PRACTICAL WORK; RESULTING FROM YEARS OF EXPERIENCE AND CLOSE OBSERVATION IN EXTENSIVE APIARIES, BOTH IN PENNSYLVANIA AND OALIFORNIA. WITH DIRECTIONS HOW 10 MAKE BRB-KERPING A DESIRABLE AND LUCRATIVE BUSINESS, AND FOR SHIPPING BEES TO CALIFORNIA. BY W. 0. HARBISON, PRACTICAL APIARIAN, NEW YORK: C. M. SAXTON, BARKER & CO. AGRICULTURAL BOOK PUBLISHERS, No. 25 PARK ROW. 1860. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1860, by W. C. HARBISON, In the Clerk’s Office of the District Court of the United States for the Western District of the State of Pennsylvania. W. 8. HAVEN, PRINFER AND STEREOTYPER, PITTSBURGH, PA. @ 946555" bs PREFACE. Tur author of this treatise, having been taught from youth to work with Bees, ever admiring their great sagacity, industry and perseverance, and desiring to turn their industry to ac- count as a matter of profit, directed all his efforts to acquire a correct knowledge of their habits, wants and requirements necessary to continued prosperity and profit. He observed, years ago, that when the seasons were fa- vorable for producing abundance of honey, bees invariably flourished and increased rapidly, yielding large returns in the shape of surplus honey, bidding defiance to worms and all other enemies, being evidently prosperous and happy; but when scarcity prevailed, the very reverse of this condition of things was true; adversity took the place of prosperity—some would starve, others would fall a prey to their enemies. The succession of honey-producing flowers has been materially influenced by the clearing up and bringing under cultivation of our lands, essentially changing the condition of things, affecting the prosperity of bees at certain seasons of the -year, in about the same ratio that it has cattle or other stock which was permitted to run in the woods, as it was called (when their pasture grounds were fenced in, then supplies (iii) iv PREFACE. were cut off); with this difference, that for all other stock provision has been made to suit the change of circumstances, but for bees no care has been manifested, hence they have been steadily decreasing in numbers in the older settled parts of our country, until the fact becomes apparent, that without a change of policy in this direction they will eventually become extinct; or at least prevent bee-keeping from assuming any importance, because of its uncertainty. This state of facts led me to inquire, what could be done to render bee-keeping as reliable and certain in its results as other rural pursuits. Having examined all the works on bee culture that I could procure (some of which were very valu- able), all failed to point out a practical plan to feed bees, or supply them with a uniform succession of flowers, or pasturage, sufficient to keep them as prosperous as when wild flowers abounded. We are told, it is true, to feed them a little in the field to keep them from starving through the winter or early spring; but they rather discountenance feeding for any other purpose or providing pasturage with a view to keep them con- stantly advancing from spring to fall. Being well assured that it would pay better to keep bees employed from early spring until fall, than to let them remain idle for want of something to do, I adopted the plan of either feeding, as directed in the chapter on feeding, or cultivated such crops as would furnish them with abundant supplies. This plan I have practiced for some time past both in Pennsylvania and California, to which latter State, in connection with J. S. Harbison, of Sacramento, I made two large and successful shipments of bees. PREFACE. Vv The results of my practice, and the success that has invari- ably crowned my efforts in the management of bees, has been favorably and extensively noticed by the press, and has induced persons from various parts of the United States to write letters of inquiry respecting my mode of managing bees, leading to such satisfactory results; these letters have accumulated to such an extent, that it is impossible to answer each personally and satisfactorily ; hence I concluded to give to the public a synopsis of my experience, with such hints and suggestions as may possibly benefit some bee-keepers and ad- vance the general interest. It is with pleasure that I acknowledge my indebtedness to Mr. Quinby, for extracts from his valuable work entitled “The Mysteries of Bee-Keeping Explained,” and also for other valu- able matter kindly furnished by him. Although we may differ upon some minor points in practice, there is but little differ- ence as regards the general and leading features of bee-keeping. I am also indebted to Bevan’s work on bees for valuable ex- tracts. I would here tender my thanks to the Rev. J. Lewis Shuck, of Sacramento, California, for an article on bees and bee-keep- ing in China. In presenting this work to the public, I disclaim any pre- tensions to literary attainments; my only object has been to impart to others a knowledge of my experience. 1* CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF THE HONEY BEE, The queen, - 5 11 Do worker bees accord royal honors to Description of the queen, - 12 queens, 30 Does the queen govern the colony, 13 Mode of rearing queens, 33 No sovercignty exercised by the queen Impregnation of queens, - 44 over the colony, 15 Langstroth’s theomy, 55 The economy of the colony directed by The worker bee, - ST workers, + - 19 = Description of the working bee, 58 The only necessity for the queen is to The drone, 61 provideeggs, - - 23 Drone-laying queens, - 63 No eggs are deposited by the queen in Fertile workers, - 04 queen cells, > oe 26 SPRING. CHAPTER II. BREEDING OF BEES. Rearing brood, - - + 6 Young bees reared without water, 71 Mode of commencing, - - - 68 Whenand how brood is reared up and Mode of laying eggs described, - 69 perfected, 72 Description of the eggs, - + 69 Quantity of eggs laid by a queen, 15 CHAPTER III. WAX. Wax, 8 76 Comb, or architecture of Lees, vt) Analysis of wax, 78 Economy of materials, 81 CHAPTER IV. BEE-BREAD, OR POLLEN. Boo bread, or pollen, 86 How pollen is stored, - 90 (vii) vill CONTENTS. CHAPTER V. HONEY. Different qualities of honey, - 93 Propolis, or bee-glue, - - 95 CHAPTER VI. THE APIARY. No danger of bees returning if removed a mile or more, - 100 Kind of stands, 101 Another method, - 102 Still another plan, - 102 Proper height, - - - - 103 Distance between hives, - 104 Bee houses, - + « - 104 A simple shed preferred, . - 105 Another method of covering, - - 106 Procuring bees to commence an apiary,106 Kind of stocks to buy, - -107 Proper size and kind of hives, 108 Transporting bees short distances, - 109 Best time for transporting bees, - 110 CHAPTER VII. BEE HIVES. Improved movable comb hives, > 115 Specifications, Ce 122 Langstroth’s hive, . oe 116 Billoflumber, - - + + +126 Harbison’s improved movable comb Frames, - + + - + 17 hive, - 2 2 2 = 118 Phelps’ movable comb hive, + 128 CHAPTER VIII. HONEY BOXES. Glass boxes, - - + + + 129 Thesectional honey box, - + + 130 CHAPTER IX. BEE PASTURAGE. Best kind of early pasturage, - +188 | Mustard and mignonette, 138 The next pasturage, - 184 Cephglanthus, or butter-bush, - ~- 140 Early summer flowers, - - +186 Buckwheat, - - - . 141 SUMMER. CHAPTER X. MANAGEMENT OF BEES. How to conquer bees, - 143 How to transfer, 7 5 6 + 146 Protection, - 144 CHAPTER XI. ARTIFICIAL SWARMS. To rear queens to supply artificial swarms, - - 148 Making artificial swarms, 149 Another method, + + 163 Still another plan of dividing and making artificial swarms, - - 155 How to strengthen artificial swarms, 158 Plan to prevent bees leaving new col- onies and returning to the old one,160 CONTENTS. ix CHAPTER XII. FEEDING. How to feed bees, - 162 —sEffects of feeding, versus non-feeding, 176 The importance of feeding bees con- A case where bees were not fed, - 177 sidored, - - + 164 How to manage bees in common box Kind of feed used, + 169 hives, - - 181 Bevan on feeding, 171 CHAPTER XIII. NATURAL SWARMING. Time to expect first swarms, - 186 Cause of swarming, 190 Condition of things necessary for swar- ming - - + 190 Requisites before preparation of queen cells, - 191 State of queen cells when used, - 192 The state when swarms issue, - 193 Other symptoms immediately preced- ing the issuing of a swarm, 194 The modus operandi of swarming, - 195 Alighting and hiving swarms, - 198 How to prevent swarms from leaving their hives, - 201 What bees compose the new swarm, 202 Cultivate fruit trees in or near the apiary, ce - 204 Swarms clustering, - - 2065 Do swarms send spies to seek a new home, - - - - 206 Places generally selected by swarms, 207 To prevent more than one swarm starting at one time, - 209 After-swarms, - 212 CHAPTER XIV. HOW TO MAKE BEES PROFITABLE. How to make becs profitable without a rapid increase of colonies, - - 217 CHAPTER XV. LOSS OF QUEENS. Cause of their loss, - 3 2 2B Indication of the loss, - - + 224 The result, - CHAPTER XVI. MANAGEMENT OF HONEY. Putting on honey boxes, - » 226 How to kill worms in honey boxes, - 230 Taking off surplus honey, - - 226 Packing honey boxes for carrying to Keeping and marketing honey, 228 market, - . - 231 CHAPTER XVII. ENEMIES OF BEES. Enemies of bees, - 232 Irritability of bees, - - = 233 CHAPTER XVIII. OVERSTOCKING. Can the country bo overstocked with bees, - 2 2 - +234 x CONTENTS. CHAPTER XIX. WATERING BEES. Watering bees, 240 Mr. Quinby’s letter on watering bees, 243 CHAPTER XX. SHIPPING BEES TO CALIFORNIA. Shipping bees to California, - - 246 No bees in California prior to its con- quest by the Americans, = 249 The first stock of beesin California, 252 Other shipments, - - 252 How our first shipment was prepared, 254 Sevond shipment—how prepared, - 255 Peculiarities of bees in California, 259 AUTUMN. CHAPTER XXI. “ROBBING. Robbing, -~ - - - = - 261 Cause of robbing, - - = 262 How to prevent robbing, - + 262 How to detect robbing, - - - 268 Remedy, - - - CHAPTER XXII. UNITING SWARMS. Uniting weak swarms in the fall, - 265 To unite swarms in box hives,- - 266 WINTER. CHAPTER XXIII. WINTERING BEES. Protection, - oe - 268 ‘The invention of winter mats, 278 Another method of making winter mats, - 275 Mode of applying them, - + + 275 ‘Mr. Quinby’s opinion of tho value of these winter mats, - - - 278 .Patent applied for, - - 278 How bees winter if left to themselves, 279 Best shaped hive for wintering bees in, 231 Wintering bees in dark rooms, = 282 CHAPTER XXIV. PROFITS OF BEE KEEPING, CHAPTER XXV. HONEY BEE IN CHINA, - es WHERE RIGHTS MAY BE OBTAINED, : = 288 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. CHAPTER I. HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY OF THE HONEY BEE. THE Bex is considered by naturalists as belonging to what are called perfect societies of insects, and in entomological arrangements is placed in the order of Hymenoptera, genus Apis. Every association or colony of bees comprises three descriptions of indi- viduals, and each description is distinguished by an appearance and cast of character peculiar to itselfi (Bevan.) THE QUEEN. The queen, as she is now generally called (the mother bee would be a much more appropriate name to designate the functions which properly belong to her in the economy of the hive), is without doubt the most important personage in the association, or colony; not from any useful labor which she per- forms in building combs, storing honey, or anything of this kind, nor yet for enacting laws and dictating (11) 12 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. to the rest of the colony what they shall and what they shall not do, with that pomp and dignity sup- posed to be the prerogative of earthly potentates gen- erally; but for the humble position and for the sim- ple purpose of laying eggs from which the young are reared, and thus becomes the means of extending and perpetuating her species. In discussing this part of my subject, my expe- rience will necessarily lead me to differ, on some points, from writers whose ipse dixit is generally re- ceived as orthodox. DESCRIPTION OF THE QUEEN. The queen, or mother bee, is easily distinguished from all other bees in the colony, by a more measured, sedate movement; the greater length of her body, which tapers gradually to a point; the proportionate shortness of her tas queen. wings, Which reach but little beyond her middle, ending about the third ring of her ab- domen, but are very strong and sinewy; her head is rounder, her trunk or thorax more slender and but little more than half the length of that of the com- mon worker bee; her legs, though longer, have nei- ther brushes nor baskets for collecting pollen; she differs in color from all other bees in the colony, as much as in shape—the upper part of her body is of a much brighter black, the under surface and the legs are of a dark orange or copper color, the hind legs being rather darker than the rest. HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 13 DOES THE QUEEN GOVERN THE COLONY? My experience upon this point is, that she does not, or if she does exercise any controlling power, it is to a very limited extent indeed; but on the con- trary, I firmly believe her to be a creature of the col- ony, or worker bees, and subject to their power and control, from the time the egg is deposited from which she is reared, up to the perfect queen, and from that time to the day of her death. It is gen- erally conceded that the worker bees possess the pow- er to rear a queen from any egg deposited in a worker cell, and it is generally supposed that the change is caused by the quantity and quality of food given them whilst in the larva state, producing a fully developed insect instead of one but partially developed, as in the case of the common workers, and in this opin- ion I fully concur. Now if food can be varied to produce such striking results as this, may it not pro- duce very important results in another direction? (as I will have occasion to refer to hereafter.) Thus we find the common bees can rear a queen at pleasure, when they have eggs. Now suppose the old queen is removed from a colony when in possession of eggs, what is the result? Do they scatter off, hither and thither, having lost their governor or sovereign; or do they become lazy, indolent or reckless, not caring now to protect their stores, as would most unques- tionably be the case were they dependent upon the queen to direct them in their duty, allotting to each their task? Nay, every observing apiarian can tes- tify to the reverse of all this. 2 14 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. When the queen is removed they very soon miss her, and immediately make a diligent search for her in and about the hive, apparently manifesting a great anxiety for her safety. If she is not found in a short time, they settle down and go to work quietly, as if nothing unusual had happened. To replace their lost queen now seems to be their greatest concern. It would be very difficult for the most skillful and careful observer to detect any thing different in their movements from those in possession of a queen; the only difference, perhaps, is, that if any comb is built it is pretty certain to be drone cells. Honey and pollen will be gathered and stored, and every thing carried on with the same order and precision that it could be if a queen was present. Now if the queen rules a colony and directs its movements, laying out all the plans, &c. as most writers would have us be- lieve, where is the directing or governing power vested, in the absence of a queen? Are the various manipulations of the hive carried on at random? I think not. Every bee, when it is born into the world, is most unquestionably endowed by nature with that instinct which prompts it to enter upon the discharge of its appropriate duties, and also with the knowledge and mechanical skill necessary to perform those du- ties; no apprenticeship under skilled architects is necessary to enable the young bee to build the most beautiful comb, complete in all its relations, which has been a problem to the most profound philoso- phers and geometricians for centuries (the mode of testing the truth of this position will be given in HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 15 another place); hence I think facts will justify me in believing, First. That no sovereignty is exercised by the queen over the other bees in the colony. Second. That the entire economy of the colony is directed and executed by the worker bees, including, to a very considerable extent, the actions of the queen. Third. The only necessity for the presence of the qu@en is to supply the colony with eggs. Fourth. That the time of laying eggs, and the number required at any given period, is controlled by the workers, and not by the queen. Fifth. That no eggs are deposited in the queen cells by queens. Sixth. That no homage or filial affection is ren- dered or manifested for the queen by the workers, other than from the instinct of self-preservation. NO SOVEREIGNTY EXERCISED BY THE QUEEN UPON THE COLONY. No doubt I will be pronounced heterodox by many, and especially by cotemporary authors and their ad- herents, who have made the sovereignty of the queen and the homage and filial affection rendered her by her loving subjects, a theme over which they have become very eloquent, and even romantic. This course on the part of authors tends, in my opin- ion, to continue and perpetuate in a modified form that mystery which has for ages surrounded and ob- scured bees and bee-keeping, and no doubt in many 16 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. cases prevents persons from engaging in apiarian pursuits (which are both pleasing and profitable), from a dread of being unable to understand and manage properly such a complicated kind of stock, and one so uncertain and so difficult to comprehend. Lapprehend that when the facts connected with this subject are fully known, anda true knowledge of the internal economy of the society of bees is simpli- fied and presented truthfully, without being inter- mixed with the remains of superstition, it will theif be demonstrated that bees can be understood and man- aged by the community at large upon the same gen- eral principles, and with similar assurances of suc- cess, as any other domestic stock. Any thing which I may present will be for the purpose of simplifying and removing objections which have by many been considered insurmountable to bee-keeping, and not with any desire to provoke controversy upon the part of any with whom I may chance to differ. In connection with my first proposition, that no sovereignty is exercised by the queen, I have already given my reasons for this conclusion to a considera- ble extent, but will give some experiments to show that each individual bee fully understands its own duty from instinct, without any instruction. Just as soon as they were able to commence the performance thereof, I took a number of frames, (being full of combs, brood, &ec.) shook the bees down on a sheet in front of the hive; all the old bees, or nearly so, would within a few minutes take wing and return to their hive. I should remark, however, that a hive HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 17 was selected in which a large amount of brood had been emerging for a day or two previous, and was still emerging. With a little patience and care, al- most every bee that is old enough to fly can be re- moved or separated from those that are yet unable to fly; in this manner enough of these young bees can be obtained to make a small swarm, sufficient to keep two brood combs warm, if other combs are placed on each side, and the whole covered or closed around, giving the colony space just in proportion to its size. Combs were selected from which brood was rapidly emerging; and an embryo queen was set in one of the combs, in a central position. This exper- iment was made in very warm weather; the entrance was contracted so that robbers were not likely to at- tack it. Now for the result. The first day, not a single bee could be seen to enter or depart; the sec- ond day, a bee might be seen coming out and appa- rently making very short excursions, and again re- turning; this only occurred at long intervals. On examining the interior, the numbers seemed to be very much increased by those that had emerged from the comb; many bees could now be observed pretty well developed, apparently capable of going abroad to the fields and engaging in their daily avocations. On the third day a few more could be seen at the entrance. Fourth day, the number still increased ; one could be seen occasionally carrying pollen; young queen emerged evening of this day; colony quite lively. Fifth day, began to work quite regu- larly, evidently carrying both honey and _ pollen. O* 1s BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. Sixth day, still increasing in strength. Seventh day, working quite briskly, considering the size of the colony. Eighth and ninth days, working as strong, apparently, in proportion to their numbers, as any stock in the apiary. On the evening of the ninth day (five days from the time the queen emerged from her cell), a few eggs were observed in one of the combs. Tenth day, the number of eggs was greatly increased; the queen was now fertile, and the exper- iment of making a colony of bees, composed entirely of young ones, without a single exception, was a perfect success, the bees continuing to thrive and do well. We have instituted similar experiments with the same result. Can it be supposed, with any degree of plausibility, that those young bees were governed by a queen, or other royal dignitary, four days having elapsed without any queen being in the colony, ex- cept the one yet sealed up in the cell; nor were there any old bees to instruct them in the affairs of the colony. I forgot to mention that three queen cells were commenced before the queen emerged from her cell, but of course were then discontinued. In one or two cases, we have had them to rear and perfect queens in this manner. ~ But I find, upon examination, that I am not the first to suppose that the queen exercised no authority over the other bees. Bonner, an eminent Scotch writer of the last century, uses the following lan- guage: “ But as it is also now unanimously admitted that HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 19 she (the queen) lays every egg im the hive, she ought rather be called the mother bee, for indeed from the best observation that ever I could make, she possesses and exerts no sovereignty over the other bees; she evidences the greatest anxiety for the good of the commonwealth with which she is con- nected, and indeed every member of it shows an equal regard for her welfare; but I never could ob- serve that she issues any positive orders to. be punctu- ally obeyed by the other bees. The truth seems to be, that she and the other bees are all equally ac- quainted with their duty by instinct, and have an equal pleasure in performing it, without waiting for orders from each other. That there is, nevertheless, the greatest order and regularity among them, is cer- tain, for they lay their plans and execute them in the best possible manner, by the influence of the above powerful substitute for reason.” THE ECONOMY OF THE COLONY DIRECTED BY THE WORKERS. It seems evident that in the creation and organi- zation of societies or colonies of honey bees, as in other things, the sexes are, to a certain extent, depend- ent on each other for the propagation and perpetua- tion of their species; but here we have the strange anomaly of the neuter gender, or rather of the unde- veloped sex (of which the colony is mainly composed), feeding and nursing the young, and caring for them with as much parental devotion and solicitude as though they were actually their own offspring, the queen simply depositing the eggs in their appro- 20 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. priate place. It seems they also have the knowledge and ability to rear the brood in such manner as would seem best for the welfare of the colony, either by rearing it all as undeveloped females (common workers), or fully developing a portion thereof and making queens. I refer to eggs deposited in worker cells; those in drone cells are drones, and nothing else. When a swarm issues from a colony, the workers are the first to go forth; a considerable portion of the swarm generally emerges before the queen takes wing. This rule is deviated from in many instances in after swarms, but I never knew an instance with first swarms. The workers are also the first to select a place to cluster; and in many cases I have carefully observed to see if the queen was first, or even among the first, to alight; but as a general thing a consid- erable portion of the swarm would cluster, when her ladyship might be seen alighting in their midst. I have known swarms to cluster, and in some cases remain until put into the hive, and then return to the parent stock, when I knew the queen had not left at all, having seen her running round on the alighting board and return into the hive, apparently unable to fly, or unwilling to risk herself on the wing; the bees evidently having done their part, expected the queen to do hers. It is true, however, that in a very few cases I have known the queen to get down in the weeds or grass, being unable to arise and fly again; the worker bees after some time would discover her, and would then cluster upon and ILISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 21 around her. But this is not their natural way of doing; it is the exception, and not the rule. Hence I conclude the worker bees lead off in swarming and in clustering, the queen following instead of leading. Her presence is absolutely necessary to the welfare of the swarm, simply for the purpose of supplying the means of replenishing the stock; of this they seem perfectly aware. They prefer returning to the parent stock to setting up without her. When a swarm is hived, the workers lay the foun- dation of the combs, and carry on the work until finished ; the queen depositing eggs in the cells as they are progressing, not waiting for their comple- tion. They also collect the food necessary for the sustenance of the entire colony. But some one is ready to say, perhaps the queen directs all this. Just take her away, and see how quickly a change will take place. Now let us see what the change will be. Suppose the queen has laid a few eggs in the first comb built, and we remove her from the hive en- tirely; the bees will set to work to rear queens from those eggs, and the other business of the hive will go on as if nothing unusual had happened; honey and pollen will be gathered and stored; whatever eggs or brood may be in the hive are properly cared for; and all progress finely so long as they have the means of supplying themselves with a queen. In- deed it is next to impossible even for the experienced apiarian to detect anything wrong from outside ap- pearances; and yet there is no queen to direct them or instruct them in their duty ; every member of the 22 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. colony, as has already been remarked, knows its duty, and discharges that duty with alacrity, not wait- ing for orders from the queen or from each other. When the yield of honey abroad is good, an in- creased amount of brood is reared; but when it is cut off suddenly by frost, or any other casualty, I have seen them drag the brood, both worker and drones, in all stages, from the combs, at the same time killing and driving out the mature drones, as if a famine was just at hand. Is it the queen that di- rects this destruction of her offspring? To test the matter to the satisfaction of any one, just remove the queen, when such a case occurs, from some strong stock, and the only perceptible difference will be, that the one having no queen will retain a portion of the drones, for the purpose, doubtless, of impregnat- ing the young queen, should they be successful in rearing one from eggs in the combs when the queen is taken away. The preparation for swarming is, I believe, made entirely by the workers. The fact is stated by sev- eral authors, in which I concur, that a guard of worker bees are placed over the queen cells during their progress, to prevent the old queen from de- stroying them, which she would most certainly do if left to the freedom of her own will, and effectually prevent any swarm from going forth in a state of nature, the result of which would be to bring the whole race to an end ere long. , Here we have positive evidence of the workers governing the queen, and controlling her actions. HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 23 When a top swarm has gone forth, the old queen accompanying them, leaving embryo queens in the hive, the guard is continued to prevent the first one out from rushing to and destroying all her sister queens, thereby preventing the possibility of any after swarms going forth. In some instances the young queens are imprisoned in their cells for days, being fed through an opening at the end of the cell, by the workers, until circumstances change so as to make it proper to release them. Experiments can easily be instituted by amateurs, or any one doubting the truth of this, to test it, by constructing observatory hives, with glass sides, ex- posing to view the combs and all the workings of the colony. Directions will be found on another page for constructing such hives. Thus we find the worker bees capable of carrying _on all the affairs of the hive, rearing a queen when destitute (providing they have eggs), controlling the queen, and preventing her from destroying the em- bryo queens; and I will venture the opinion, that they (the workers) cause her to leave the old hive with the top swarm ; if left to herself, she would not emigrate from her old home. This is but an opinion, the truth of which time and observation will demonstrate. THE ONLY NECESSITY FOR THE QUEEN IS TO PROVIDE EGGS FOR THE COLONY. That the colony is entirely dependent on the queen for a supply of eggs, few will doubt; but the idea has generally prevailed that this is not her only 24 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. duty. Cunosity has prompted me to scrutinize this matter pretty closely, but I have failed to discover that she performs any other office in the colony ex- cept the one just indicated. I never could observe that she had any care for her offspring, either feed- ing them or manifesting any parental anxiety what- ever for their welfare; in fact, the workers, as a gen- eral thing, supply her ladyship with her food, from time to time, as she requires it. Mr. Quinby, in referring to the duties of the queen, says, “‘the queen is the mother of the entire family; her duty appears to be only to deposit eggs in the cells. Iam also led to believe that the time for the queen to lay eggs, and the requisite quantity, is in a measure indicated by the workers—the kind of food which they give her, or the quantity of it, as the case may be. This, I feel quite sure, promotes the rapid production and depositing of eggs in the one case, and in the reverse of that a diminution, even to the entire cessation thereof.” I have already noticed that the workers have the faculty or power of rearing a queen from an egg laid in a worker cell, by giving them a liberal supply of food of a peculiar kind, the effect of which seems to be the full devel- opment of the sex, which, if permitted to have re- mained in the worker cell, and been fed on the com- mon or ordinary food, it had been a worker, or a partially developed female. Here we see the pow- erful effects of stimulating food, for such it doubtless is. Would it be unreasonable to suppose that food of a similar kind, given to the perfect queen, would HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 25 greatly affect the production of eggs, either to in- crease or diminish the quantity ? That the food consumed by the queen, as a gen- eral thing, is given to her in a prepared form by the workers, I have no doubt. The large amount con- sumed by her, and no doubt necessary for her support during the time of her greatest activity in depositing eggs, has been noticed by authors. It is well known that in a few days after honey be- comes plenty in the fields, after a scarcity, the queen invariably becomes very prolific; a sufficient time apparently elapsing for an increased amount of food to effect this change. The effect of an increased amount of honey abroad is about the same on colo- nies that have a large surplus of honey in store, as it is on those that have a small supply. Thus we see it is not caused by actual scarcity or want of honey, but simply because the workers, in the exercise of their instinct (knowing the scarcity of honey abroad), withhold from the queen the amount of food neces- sary to stimulate her to greater fertility. A proper knowledge of this peculiarity will enable the apiarian to stimulate his bees to breed to their full capacity, by feeding when it is desirable to increase the num- ‘ber of his stocks, or for the purpose of making those he may have strong and vigorous. It is well known to apiarians that the quantity of eggs is regulated in some way or other; but no one, to my knowledge, has attempted to give the modus operand. Mr. Langstroth says, ‘some apiarians be- lieve that she (the queen) can regulate their develop- 2 26 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. ment (eggs), so that few or many are produced, accord- ing to the necessities of the colony.” That this is true to a certain extent, seems highly probable; for if a queen is taken from a feeble colony, her abdo- men seldom appears greatly distended; and yet, if put in a strong one, she speedily becomes prolific. He continues: “I conceive that she has the power of regulating or repressing the development of her eggs, so that gradually she can diminish the number maturing and finally cease laying, and remain inac- tive as long as circumstances require.” The old queen appears to qualify herself for ac- companying a first swarm, by repressing the devel- opment of eggs; and as this is done. at the most genial season of the year, it does not seem to be the result of atmospheric influence. The only difference upon this point between Mr. Langstroth and myself is, that he ascribes entirely to the queen the ability to produce a greater or less amount of eggs, whilst I believe this matter is regulated entirely by the com- mon worker bees, by the quantity or quality of food they give her; or in other words, she is an instru- ment which they use as they see fit, to supply them with eggs from which to replenish the hive with young workers, NO EGGS ARE DEPOSITED BY THE QUEEN IN QUEEN CELLS. This may seem paradoxical to some, yet I think facts will fully confirm this opinion. The inveterate hostility that exists between queens is well known by all observing bee-keepers. So fearful are they of a HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 27 rival in the family, that I have known them fre quently to rush to the queen cells, and if permitted by the bees, destroy the contents of every one, from the larva of a day or two old up to those in an ad- vanced stage; and they are just as ready to do this, and will do it, if permitted, as certainly, at the swarming time, as at any other. This I have tested, by removing the queen from a strong stock, and im- prisoning her in a queen cage, keeping her in another hive for a few days, until several queen cells were commenced, then placing the cage containing her back in her own hive, where she remained until the queen cells were advanced to the desired point. I once kept a queen in a cage in a hive having a fer- tile queen, for over three weeks, the bees feeding her all the time. If any one doubts that they (the work- ers) feed the queen, try this experiment; then set her at liberty in the hive, when she will immediately hunt out every cell and destroy it, thus taking the workers by surprise, as it were, they supposing, per- haps, that she is still in her prison, and not being prepared to guard the embryo queens, which they doubtless intend in part to use for the purpose of supplying swarms that might go forth, if circum- stances are favorable. This is on the supposition that the experiment is instituted in the swarming season. Bevan relates a circumstance just in point here. “Tn July, when the hive (one of Dunbar’s mirror hives) had become filled with comb and bees and well stored with honey, and when the queen was very 28 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. fertile, I opened the hive and took her majesty away ; on the next day I observed that they had founded five royal cells in the usual way, under such cireum- stances; and in the course of the afternoon four more were founded on parts of the comb where there were eggs only a day or two old. Two of the royal cells advanced more rapidly than the rest, probably from the larva being of an egg the fittest for the purpose ; four came on more slowly, and three made no pro- gress after the third day. On the seventh, the two first were sealed, two more were nearly so. On the morning of the fourteenth day from the old queen’s removal, a young queen, differing in no respect from une produced in the natural way, emerged from her cell, and proceeded toward the other royal cell, evi- dently with a murderous intent. She was jammed. ately pulled back by the workers with violence, and this conduct was repeated on their part as often as the queen renewed her destructive purpose; at every repulse she appeared sulky, and cried ‘peep,’ ‘peep;’ the unhatched queen responding, but in a somewhat hoarser tone, owing to her confined situation. This parley, as Butler calls it, continued for several hours together, with intervals of about a minute. In the evening of the same day the second queen was hatch- ed, or emerged from her cell. I saw her, says Mr. B., come forth in majesty, finely and delicately formed, but smaller than the other.’ Tn this case it is very evident that they designed one of these queens to go off with a swarm. I HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 29 should perhaps remark, that this experiment was made in an observatory hive, glass sides—what Bevan calls a mirror hive. Suddenly alarm a colony that has its preparations for swarming nearly completed, i. e. young queens in an advanced condition, such as are found previous to the first swarm going forth, so as to withdraw the attention of the guard of workers from the royal cells for a time, as a general thing the old queen will destroy all the embryo queens; she will most cer- tainly do so, if not prevented by the workers. Does not this prove very conclusively that the queen of a colony does not desire any other queen raised in her domains, for any purpose, and consequently does not deposit any eggs in the royal cells ? The workers, when they find it necessary to rear queens, either for the purpose of supplying the place of one just taken from them, or for swarming pur- poses, remove eggs from the worker cells and place them in the prepared queen cells. I have known them to do this frequently, wheu I have removed the queen. Several cells would be built from three- eighths to half an inch deep, within twenty-four to forty hours. I have looked into these very fre- quently, when no egg was to be seen, and noted such cells carefully, having examined again and again. Perhaps in a few hours, or during that day or the next, an egg could be distinctly seen attached to the top of the cell, nothing else being in the cell; a few hours afterward a very small quantity of a whitish substance could be seen surrounding the egg; this 3x 380 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. was greatly increased after the egg was hatched out and became larva. This experiment I have tried time and again, with the same result. There being no queen in the hive, how came the egg in the queen cell, unless the work- ers removed it thither? That they did this, I have no reason to doubt. If they are capable of doing so in the absence of a queen, is it not reasonable to suppose that they can do so when preparing to swarm, while the queen still remains in the hive; and fur- ther, that this is the method generally practiced. Sometimes the partitions between two or three cells were piereed out and formed into a queen cell. Where there is young larva two or three days old, such are not removed. Cells constructed in this way are generally but a few degrees from a horizontal position; whilst queens raised from the egg almost invariably occupy a perpendicular position. Query. Does not this offer a solution to the mystery of drone laying queens, they having been but imperfectly de- veloped ? DO THE WORKER BEES ACCORD ROYAL HONORS TO THE QUEEN. I have failed thus far to discover or observe that any homage was done the queen, unless feeding her may be considered as such; this I apprehend has been mistaken for that fond caressing which some authors laud so highly. When the true state of the case is understood, it will strip the queen of much of rovalty with which she has been invested. ‘The guard HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 81 of honor which some authors have accorded her, is likely to be reduced to a few menials, whose business it is to prepare her meals and serve them up to her. When she is passing over the brood-comb, apparently searching for the proper cells in which to deposit her eggs, the workers step aside and give her room to proceed with her work ; just as a man who was stand- ing idle would step aside to give room to another to proceed with his work, no homage being done in vither case, nor yet any filial affection shown. When I have observed the queen in any other posi- tion than on the brood comb, she would pass over or amongst the workers just as any humble worker might do; very seldom, indeed, do they get out of her way. She has her peculiar stately, or rather ambling motion, which serves to distinguish her from any other in the hive; this is doubtless caused by the vast amount of food consumed, and the immense number of eggs elaborated by her when in her great- est fertility, and not from a knowledge of royal blood flowing in her veins. The motions of the young queen before she becomes fertile, are but little different from the workers; she is quite brisk and active, either on foot or on the wing. No notice apparently is taken of her until she becomes fertile (by the workers); this. fact has been related by several authors. When she becomes fertile, and enters upon her duties—as I have stated, passing over the brood combs, depositing eggs—the workers simply stepping out of the way, permitting her to proceed with her labors without hindrance; 32 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. add to this the fact that a few bees prepare and sup- ply her with food, in connection with the knowledge or instinct which teaches the bees the necessity for the presence of the queen, merely for the purpose of supplying the hive with eggs—and we have all of royalty or filial affection for the queen by the work- ers which I have been able to discover. Whenever she ceases to perform this duty to the satisfaction of the workers—when from age or accident she becomes less prolific, ceasing to furnish sufficient eggs to sup- ply the wants of the colony—how do the workers proceed? Are they prompted by their filial affection for their mother, so to speak, to permit her to remain mistress of the hive, doing the best service her age or infirmities would permit her to render? Nay; when this occurs, they rear one or more young queens (we might suppose, in opposition to her remon- strances, or perhaps entreaties). When one is in a fit condition to take her place, she is ignominiously sacrificed, apparently for the good of the society for which she is unable longer to furnish the means of perpetuation. Just as soon as she fails to perform her appropriate duties, she is dealt with as remorse- lessly and as promptly by the workers as the drones are when they cease to be useful to promote the welfare of the colony; hence the old adage is true, that in a hive not a single useless idle bee is permitted to remain. My object has been to get at facts; I have no disposition to attempt to underrate the value and the well known and absolute necessity of the queen; no HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 383 colony can possibly exist more than a few weeks, or at most a few months, without her; but I deem it necessary to explain things as experience has taught me. , MODE OF REARING QUEENS, It has been hinted already, that the worker bees could rear a queen at will from any egg laid in a worker cell; this they do when left to take their own course, or when in a state of nature, in order to pro- vide queens for swarms that may issue. They also do this when their queen is removed from the hive for the purpose of making artificial swarms, or by any accident, provided they have or are supplied with brood-comb, containing eggs, or larva not more than four days old. These are what, for the sake of distinction, are called artificial queens, but I never could discover any difference between them and those raised naturally (or when they are preparing to swarm—the other queen still remaining in the hive), when in both cases they commenced with the un- hatched egg and not with larva. When the queen is taken from a colony, instinct or reason, if I may be permitted so to term it, teaches the workers the importance of having her place supplied, at the very earliest possible moment, with another fertile queen. They are also aware, no doubt, that this desirable object may be attained a few days sooner, by taking a larva that has been hatched three or four days, and fed on food only designed to de- velope it as a common worker up to that time. The cell is now greatly enlarged, by cutting out the par- 84 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. titions between that and adjoining cells, and rearing a cell in proper form. The forcing process, so to speak, is now commenced, by supplying the larva with a large quantity of royal jelly, instead of the ple- beian food on which it fed for the first few days of its existence. Cells constructed for larva of this kind differ from those constructed for eggs, in two partic- ulars; in the first place, they are less in size and nearly horizontal, while those constructed for eggs are almost invariably perpendicular, so much so that the embryo queen stands on her head, whilst in the other case she lies almost flat on her back, similar to the workers in the embryo state. When quecns raised from larva have emerged, which I have known them to do on the twelfth day from the removal of the old queen, and indeed in one or two instances on the eleventh day, they are less in size, shorter in the body, and of a darker color, being of a greenish brown, very similar to the worker, but destitute of that rich copper brown which so distinctly marks the perfect queen raised direct from the egg. I think it highly probable that to this cause may be traced the anomaly that has puzzled apiarians for ages past, i. e. drone-laying queens and fertile workers, each of which will be noticed elsewhere; and I have no doubt this peculiarity has misled Mr. Quinby and many others in their experiments in rearing artificial queens, as they are generally called. Tn all cases where it is desirable to have bees rear queens other than those they rear of their own ac- cord, comb should be selected having unhatched eggs HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 35 in, and it should invariably be placed in a central position in the colony, where the highest degree of temperature is found; in very full, strong stocks, almost any well covered position with bees will do. I have generally found that the most perfect and vig- orous queens are raised in colonies that were capable of maintaining a uniform temperature in the hive, above eighty degrees Fahrenheit. According to Be- van, it requires the temperature to be seventy degrees and upward to hatch the egg. The influence of tem- perature is very great in developing all varieties of the bee, but particularly so with queens. It is quite easy to place a comb in any movable comb hive containing eggs, from which several queen cells are generally suspended, being about an inch long, and three-eighths of an inch in diameter. When these cells are built about one-third of their length, being similar to the cup of an acorn, the egg is placed in it (as I believe, by the workers), when it hatches and becomes a worm; it is supplied with royal jelly, m very small particles at first, and increased as the worm or larva seems to require it; there is generally more given or put into the cell than is consumed. This kind of food is peculiar to the queen cells, and is not found in any other place in or about the hive. Royal larva construct only imperfect cocoons, open behind, and enveloping only the head, thorax and first ring of the abdomen. A curious circumstance occurs with respect to the hatching of the queen bee. When the pupa, or nymph, is about to change into the perfect insect, the bees render the cover of 36 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. the cell thinner by gnawing away part of the wax, scooping it out in waved circles at its edges; and with so much nicety do they perform this operation, that the cover at last becomes pellucid, owing to its extreme thinness, thus facilitating the exit of the queen. After the transformation is thus completed, the young queens would generally immediately emerge from their cells, as workers and drones do; but the former frequently keep the royal infants prisoners for some days, supplying them in the mean time with food through a small opening in the bottom of the cell, through which the confined queen thrusts her proboscis to receive it. In rearing queens to supply queenless hives, or to supply artificial swarms, I would recommend the apia- rian to examine carefully, about the seventh or eighth day from the time eggs were given to the colony, and one or two cells will usually be found considera- bly in advance of all the rest. These should be re- moved. If there are still others left in the hive, they may be given to colonies; but I do not regard them as very reliable, sometimes not being fully developed, having been reared from larva that were too far advanced as workers. Those reared directly from the eggs I regard as being superior in point of devel- opment, and consequently more reliable as prolific queens. This will be discussed at greater length in another place. I should remark, however, that the young queen goes forth from the hive about the second or third day after she emerges from the cell, HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 37 to meet the drone or male bee in the air, where coition takes place. I have already noticed that queens reared from larva three or four days old, would emerge from their cells as early as the eleventh or twelfth day from the time of removing the old queen; whilst those reared directly from eggs would lack three or four days of being sufficiently matured to emerge from the cell, consequently they would be consigned to certain destruction by the perhaps immature queen that came out first, unless it should happen in the swarming season, and the colony designed to swarm. If later in the season than this, the result would be about this: the first queen to emerge from her cell, whether fully developed or not, would destroy all those yet in their cells within a few hours, and cer- tainly before she went abroad to meet the drones to become fertilized; so that she would be the only dependence of the colony, there being now no eggs in the hive from which to rear another queen, whether sufficiently developed to become a mother or not. But suppose she is not sufficiently developed, as a queen or female, to have connection with the drone, and thus become fertilized, but enough so to attempt the desired object, what would be the probable re- sult? She would either repeat her excursions abroad, to meet the drones, day after day, for a considerable length of time, until she met with some accident that would terminate her existence; or after a certain time, as some think, she would commence laying drone eggs, being incapable of furnishing any other kind. A 388 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. In one instance, during the past season, I knew a queen of this kind; she was quite small, being but little larger than a common worker, and very nearly of the same color; she emerged from her cell on the eleventh day from the removal of the queen, and consequently must have been reared from larva. I was careful to watch her, and saw her about one o’clock on the second day, issue from the hive. I continued my observations, and saw her go forth five or six different days; she remained in the hive until about the sixteenth day from the time she emerged from her cell. No eggs could be found in any of the combs, neither drone nor worker cells, and I could not discover any difference in her size or appearance, as is always the case when queens be- come fertile. I then removed her and gave another queen tothe colony. I feel pretty confident that she was not sufficiently developed to become a prolific queen, or even to become a mother at all, unless, indeed, the theory of an unimpregnated queen pro- ducing only drones, is true. I think it quite reason- able to suppose that various points of development may and are occasionally attained, between the com- mon worker bee and the perfect queen, arising either from the fact of the larva being too far advanced, before feeding royal jelly, to be fully developed, or from being reared in a cool situation or imperfectly fed. It is of great importance to place brood-comb con- taining eggs from which to rear queens, in a central position in the colony; if put in a hive that has sent HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 89 off a swarm or two, it will not do to put it near the lower ends of the combs, as there is not likely to be a sufficient quantity of bees to keep up the heat to the proper temperature ; and to put combs on the top of the hive is nonsense. Whoever expects to rear queens in either way, will be disappointed. Mr. Quinby has doubtless fallen into one or all of these errors, which is common to first experiments. His mode of managing bees, prior to writing his work, had been such, I apprehend, as not to make the rearing of artificial queens of much importance to him as a matter of profit; hence I conclude he has not given this subject as much study and careful experiment as some others, whose object has been to increase their number of stocks in the most rapid manner possible. Mr. Quinby says: . “ Obtain a piece of brood-comb containing workers’ eggs, or larva very young. You will generally find it without much trouble, in a young swarm that is making combs; the lower ends usually contain eggs; take a piece from one of the middle sheets, two or three inches long; (you will probably use smoke by this time, without telling.) Invert the hive that is to receive it, put the piece edgewise between the combs, if you can spread them apart enough for the purpose; they will hold it there, and then there will be ample room to make the cells. They will nearly always rear several queens. I have counted nine several times, which were all they had room for. But yet I have very little confidence in such queens, they are almost certain to be lost.” 40 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. Again he says: “I have put such piece of brood- comb in a small glass box on the top of the hive instead of the bottom, because it was less trouble; but in this case the eggs were all removed in a short time; whether a queen was reared in the hive or not, [cannot say; but this I know, I never obtained a prolific queen, after repeated experiments in this way.” He continues: “It would appear that I have been more unfortunate with queens reared in this way than most experimenters. I have no difficulty to get them formed, to all appearance perfect, but lose them afterward. Now whether this arose from some lack of physical development, by taking grubs too far advanced to make a perfect change, or whether they were reared so late in the season, that most of the drones were destroyed, and the queen to meet one had to repeat her excursions till lost, I am yet unable to fully determine.” . . . ‘“ Yet occasion- ally prolific queens have been reared when I could account for their origin in no other way but from worker eggs.” These are just the results I would anticipate from the manner of conducting these experiments; I should have expected them to be instituted in a more workman-like manner, at least more in accordance with the habits of the bee. Mr. Quinby seems rather in doubt whether bees can and do raise prolific queens from worker eggs. However, this question is now so well understood, having been clearly demonstrated by such authors as Schirach, Februier, Swammerdam, Huber, Bonner, Bevan, Langstroth and others, that I HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 41 apprehend no reasonable doubt can exist of the truth of worker bees raising perfect prolific queens from any eggs that would have produced workers, or of rear- ing workers from any eggs that would have produced a queen; for I am fully satisfied that but two kinds of eggs are ever found in a hive of bees, moth eggs excepted. The one may be found in drone cells, which will produce only drones; the other may be found in the worker cells, and will produce only females, either partially or fully developed, as circum- stances may seem to suggest to the instinct of the bees. I have adverted to Mr. Quinby’s experiments, and his position with reference to the rearing of queens from eggs laid in worker cells, or artificial queens, if you please, from no unkind motives, or with a view to detract from his merits as an author, but to ex- plain, if possible, the cause of his failure, and thereby prevent others from falling into the same error. Bevan says: ‘Bees, when deprived of their queen, have the power of selecting one or more worker eggs, or grubs, and converting them into queens; thus showing that there is no inherent difference in female ova to effect this. Each of the promoted eggs or grubs has a royal cell or cradle formed for it, and it is liberally supplied with royal jelly; this royal jelly is a pungent food, prepared by the work- ing bees exclusively for the purpose of feeding such of the larva as are destined to become candidates for the honors of royalty, whether it be their lot to assume them or not; it is more stiz.ulating than the food of 4x 42 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. ordinary bees, has not the same mawkish taste, and is evidently acescent, or acid. From the first, the royal larva are supplied with it rather profusely, and there is always some left in the cell after their trans- formation. It becomes reddish or brown after re- maining for a time. Schirach, who was secretary to the Apiarian Society in Upper Lusatia, and vicar of Little Bautzen, may be regarded as the discoverer or rather as the promulgator of this fact; and his experiments, which were also frequently repeated by other members of the Lusatian society, have been amply confirmed by those of Huber, Bonner, Dunbar, Golding, and myself (Bevan). Keys was a violent skeptic upon this subject, so likewise was John Hun- ter. But notwithstanding the criticisms and ridicule of the former, and the sarcastic strictures of the lat- ter, the sex of workers is now established beyond all doubt. “The fact is said to have been known long before Schirach wrote. M. Vogel, and Signor Monticelli, a Neapolitan professor, have both asserted this. The former states it to have been known upward of fifty years, the latter a much longer period. He says that the Greeks and Turks in the Ionian islands, are well acquainted with it, and that in the little Sicilian island of Favignana, the art of producing queens has been known from very remote antiquity; he even thinks it was no secret to the ancient Greeks and Romans. “Swammerdam was acquainted with the power of making artificial swarms. But the result of Schi- rach’s experiments was, that all workers were origin- HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 43 ally females, but that their organs of generation were obliterated, merely because the germs of them were not developed, their being fed and treated in a par- ticular manner in their infancy, in their worm state, being necessary, in his opinion, to effect that devel- opment. Subsequent experiments have shown, how- ever, that the organs are not entirely obliterated ; they seem to be merely restrained from unfolding themselves by the size of their cradle and the quality of their food. “The most incomprehensible part of the process is, that increasing the size and changing the direc- tion of the cell, and feeding the larva with a more pungent food, should not only allow the sexual or- gans of the insect to be fully developed, but should alter the shape of her tongue, her jaws, and her sting, deprive her of the power to secrete wax, and obliterate the baskets which, but for the changes just referred to, would have been formed upon her thighs.” Thus we find that this matter was well understood many years, if not many centuries ago. Any writer who doubts that bees can and do raise perfect queens from eggs laid in worker cells, has certainly failed to acquaint. himself with the standard writers of the last century, or the first half of the present, or has failed to test the matter by properly instituted experi- ments. I have dwelt at considerable length on this subject, as I consider it one of the most important connected with bee-keeping. 44 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. IMPREGNATION OF QUEENS. Having traced this wonderful insect from the egg to the perfectly formed virgin queen, giving an ac- count of various experiments, and the views of differ- ent authors in regard to the rearing of queens, &c. I shall now advert to the more intricate and seem- ingly mysterious process of the impregnation of the queen. This is a subject, (as Bevan remarks,) which was long involved in obscurity, and which indeed is still clouded by some uncertainty. Schirach and Bon- ner denied the necessity of sexual intercourse be- tween the queen and drones, considering the former a mother and yet a virgin. Swammerdam held the same opinion; he ascribes the impregnation to a vivifying seminal aura, which is exhaled from the drones and penetrates the body of the queen. Reau- mur successfully combated this fanciful doctrine, and Huber refuted it by experiment. Reaumur supposed that there was a sexual intercourse, though his ex. periments left that question undecided. Arthur Dobbs, Esq. has given it as his opinion, that the queen’s eggs were impregnated by coition with the drones, and that a renewal of the inter- course was unnecessary; he, however, thought that she had intercourse with several, in order that there might be a sufficient deposition of sperm to impreg- nate all her eggs. The experiments of Huber were made upon virgin queens, with whose history he was acquainted from the moment they left their cells. In the course of his HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 45 experiments he found that the queens were never im- pregnated as long as they remained in the hive; but that impregnation always takes place in the open air, whilst on the wing, at a time when the heat and brightness of the day have induced the drones in large quantities to issue from the hives, on which oc- casion the queen soars high in the air, love being the motive for the only distant journey she ever takes. “The rencontre and copulation of the queen with the drone takes place exterior to the hive,” says Lombard, “and whilst they are on the wing. They are constituted in a similar manner with the family of flies. The dragon flies copulate as they fly through the air, in which state they have the appearance of a double insect.” Bevan says: “I was myself an eye witness of the following circumstances of the humble bee. A con- joined pair descended obliquely and rapidly through the air, making a loud buzz, and alighted near me. I placed a tumbler glass over them, and observed their proceedings for about twenty minutes, when they became disunited, but with considerable difficulty, and not without an angry scuffle. Having kept them together for two days, feeding them occasionally, I could not perceive any further advances on either side, but rather aversion. At the end of this time the drone, or male, died, but the queen, or female, lived, and appeared lively for many days; when I finally gave her her liberty, she flew gaily away.” This occurrence of Bevan’s proves very clearly that the humble bee is impregnated on the wing. It is 46 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. well known, also, that the nest is begun in the spring by a single bee, which is fertile and capable of laying eggs, from which a brood is raised, and ere long quite a colony is found. The same phenomenon occurs with hornets, yellow jackets and wasps, all of which are closely allied to the honey bee. It is quite evident that the queen, or the female, which starts the nest and deposits the first eggs, has been im- pregnated the fall previous, and when once fertile it serves for life. But to return to the honey bee. If the queen should be confined to the hive, even amidst a seraglio of drones, she would continue barren; but she usually takes her flight about the second or third day after leaving the cell, commonly from twelve to two o’clock, generally preceded by the drones. After traversing the alighting board for a few moments, she flies back and forth in front of the hive, until reaching the top of the covering or shed, when she describes small circles at first, gradually enlarging ; after thus surveying her locality, and noting carefully the surrounding objects (apparently for the purpose of enabling her to reach home when she would make her final excursion), she returns to the hive, again alighting and traversing the alighting board, passing into the hive and out again in front, when finally she rises aloft in the air, describing in her flight hori- zontal circles of considerable and gradually increasing diameter, and soars at last to such a height as to render it impossible to follow her movements. She generally returns from her aerial excursion in about HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 47 half an hour, with the unmistakable marks of her amours upon her. Excursions are sometimes made for a shorter period, but she seldom exhibits signs of being impregnated after these. According to Huber, one impregnation is sufficient to fertilize all the eggs that are laid for two years afterward, and perhaps sufficient to fertilize all that she lays during her whole life. This may seem in- credible to many; but need not, when we consider that in the common spider, according to Audibert, the fertilizing effects continue for many years. Impregnation in insects appears to take place whilst the eggs pass a reservoir containing sperm, situated near the termination of the oviduct in the valve., ‘In dissecting the female parts in the silk moth,” says Mr. Hunter, “I discovered a bag lying in what may be called the vagina or common oviduct, whose mouth or opening was external, but it had a canal of communication between it and the oviduct. In dissecting these parts before copulation, I found this bag empty; and when I dissected them after- ward, I found it full.” By the most decisive ex- periments, such as covering the ova of the unimpreg- nated moth after exclusion, with the liquor taken from this bag, found in those which were known to have had sexual connection, rendering them fertile, he demonstrated that this bag was a reservoir for the spermatic fluid, to impregnate the eggs as they were ready for exclusion, and that coition apd impreg- nation were not simultaneous. Linnezus thought there was a sexual intercourse 48 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. between the queens and the drones; and he even suspected that it proved fatal to the latter. Swam- merdam gives, in his “Researches in Entomology,” during the latter part of the seventeenth century, a minute drawing of the ovaries of the queen, greatly magnified, which shows a small bag or sac lying in the vagina or common oviduct, very similar to that found by Mr. Hunter in the silk moth. I think it reasonable to suppose that this sac is the receptacle for the male sperm, which serves to fertilize all the eggs which the queen may produce for life. Thus far, I believe this theory to be correct; but the process by which this is brought in contact and incorporated with the rudiments of the eggs as pro- duced in the ovaries of the queen, is yet, I apprehend, considerably in the dark. Before entering upon this point, I will relate what occurred under my own observation, in regard to the impregnation of the queen. On the 25th of May, 1859, I observed a young queen (on the third day after she emerged from her cell,) leave the hive about half past twelve o’clock; the drones were abroad in advance of her, buzzing around in every direction through the air. I watched carefully for her return, contracting the entrance a little to prevent her pass- ing directly in. In about twenty-five minutes she returned, with the unmistakable marks of coition; her appearance was similar to that presented by a worker bee when pressed between the thumb and fingers, until the intestines, or the whitish substance which surrounds and is connected with the sting, pro- MWISTORY AND PHYSIOLOUY. 49 trudes a little beyond the surrounding surface, pro- ducing an enlargement of the parts, giving her the appearance of being wounded or pressed suflicient to cause the protrusion. On the second day, about three o'clock, I examined the combs, and found eggs in one comb (worker cells), in a circle, the diameter of which was about four inches; they were on both sides of the comb. With a little more care I could have ascertained nearly the exact time that elapsed between the coition of the queen and depositing of eggs, I would suggest this method to my friend, Mr. Quinby, as a solution of the questions he would like to ask, on page 251 of his work. Since that time, I have seen three other queens return from their excursions, with the same peculiar appearance, and in every case eggs could be found in the combs within two or three days. On other occa- sious, I have seen queens return to the hive as trim and nice as when they went forth, without any change in their appearance, being unsuccessful, no doubt, in their amours; no eggs could be found, as in the for- mer cases. From these and other observations, I feel assured that the queen has connection with the drone on the wing, and that by close observation on her rettirn to the hive, her success or failure can be very easily detected, and the time of her laying eggs predicted with great certainty by the apiarian. This part of the business can be more readily seen and comprehended, than how the eggs yet unformed are affected by this impregnation. 5 50 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. I have already stated that the queen is provided with a small receptacle to receive and contain the vivifying sperm obtained from the drone by coition. The great mystery to be solved is, how does the queen draw upon this store of fluid, from time to time, to fertilize the eggs which are generated in her ovaries? Does this fluid come in contact and become incor- porated and combined with the juices or fluids pecu- liar to the queen, and of which doubtless the eggs are composed in a great measure? Is it in this man- ner that the future sex of her offspring is deter- mined? Or is it only necessary for the egg (after it is complete in all its parts,) to come in contact with the mouth or opening of this sperm receptacle, and thereby receive a sufficient portion to cause them to procreate? And is it true that the female, or queen, is of herself, without being impregnated by the drone, capable of depositing eggs that will produce only drones or males, perfect in all respects, and yet impregnation is absolutely required to produce the female? That this is true, permit me at present to doubt; its assumptions are too extravagant, and so far from harmonizing with all animated nature with which I am in any way conversant, that I am led to believe further observation and closer investigation will be necessary to fully demonstrate the true state of facts, and solve the mystery that yet surrounds this ques- tion. It is true, there are strong arguments in favor of this theory as well as against it, and further ex- periments may prove it to be correet; yet there are HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 51 some serious difficulties in the way, that to me, at least, seem hard to reconcile. Langstroth has elucidated this mystery, and no doubt made it very plain and satisfactory to himself, at least; but a very few stubborn facts sometimes de- stroy the most beautifully drawn theories. Dzierzon asserts that all impregnated eggs produce females, either workers or queens; and all unim- pregnated ones, males or drones. He also states, that in several of his hives he found drone-laying queens, whose wings were so imperfect that they were unable to fly, and which on examination, prov- ed to be unfecundated. (Query. How did he ascer- tain that fact ?) Hence he concludes that the eggs laid by the queen bee and fertile worker had from the previous impregnation of the egg from which they sprung, sufficient vitality to produce the drone, which is a less highly organized insect than the queen or worker. This argument is far fetched, and not well found- ed. Impregnation is, I think, essential to produce either male or female. THe continues: “It had long been known that the queen deposits drone eggs in the large or drone cells, and worker eggs in the small or worker cells, and that she makes no mistakes.” And he infers, therefore, that there was some way in which she was able to decide the sex-of the egg be- fore it was laid, and that she must have such a con- trol over the mouth of the seminal sac as to be able to extrude her eggs, allowing them at will to receive or not a portion of its fertilizing contents. In this 52 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. way he thought she determined their sex according to the size of the cells in which she laid them. I think it highly probable that the queen under- stands quite well, that when she deposits an egg in a drone cell it will bring forth a drone, and if in a worker cell it will bring forth a worker. That she does know when it is proper to deposit eggs in drone cells preparatory to swarming in the spring, is at- tested by all observing apiarians. Who ever saw eggs laid in drone cells in midwinter, or early in the spring, until nearly the time for swarming? Yet it is well known that all strong stocks commence to breed early in January (if, indeed, they ever cease entirely); and as the cold weather recedes the quan- tity is increased. In the latter part of March and through April, a very considerable quantity of brood may be found in all strong stocks in this latitude, 42 degrees (of course this will vary with different latitudes); and yet not a single drone can be found in any condition, from the egg to the perfect insect. I have cut holes in a worker brood-comb, and in- serted corresponding pieces of drone-comb, which they (the workers) would fasten and adjust very nicely, giving the appearance of drone cells inter- mixed with worker cells, and had all the worker cells around these drone cells filled with brood, but they remained empty; sometimes a little honey might be seen in them, as if stored there for imme- diate use. Again I have seen combs that were built irregular or in detached pieces; of these perhaps a piece of drone comb would be in a central position, HISTORY AND PHYSTOLOGY, os and toward the latter part of April would be sur- rounded on three sides by young worker brood, yet not asingle egg or young drone could be found in the drone cells. Some of my readers will perhaps say that the queen laid eggs in all the cells in the comb indis- criminately, in drone as well as worker cells; but that the workers would remove them from drone cells. To those who hold this opinion I would say, try the ex- periment, by preparing an observatory hive, and watch the queen when depositing eggs; and if you see her depositing a single egg in drone cells, al- though you may have them interspersed all through and amongst the worker cells, prior to the time of the general, and I might say simultaneous laying of drone eggs, preparatory to swarming, I will present: you with a copy of this work, gratis. If it is true that the workers remove eggs from the drone cells and destroy them, as some may sup- pose, until the proper time arrives for rearing drones, it is another strong fact in support of the worker bees controlling the entire economy of the hive. But when the proper season arrives for the great laying of drone eggs, as Bevan calls it, which is generally the last of April or first of May, drone eggs may be found simultaneously in all strong stocks that are or have been similarly situated; this will be varied by the weather and by the yield of honey. That the queen understands when the proper time arrives for rearing drones, and that no drone eggs are laid prior 5* 54 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. to that time, I have not the slightest doubt; whether this is caused by the peculiarity of the food given her, or from sume other cause, I am yet undecided. But that she can fully control the producing and the laying of eggs to generate workers, when it is best. so to do, withholding for a time, and when the proper time arrives, laying eggs to produce drones or males, is quite certain. Hence I conclude that if she can control the laying of drone eggs in the spring of the year, she can contro] it in the summer, or at any season; in short, that the queen knows the sex be- fore depositing the egg in the cell, and never makes any mistakes. If the theory is correct that the sex of the future bee is decided simply by a mechanical operation, caused by the pressure upon the abdomen of the queen, in the act of depositing an egg in a worker cell, thereby forcing a sufficient portion of the male sperm out upon the egg during its passage to fertil- jze it, and cause it to be a female or a worker; and in depositing an egg in a drone cell, it being so much larger, no pressure occurs, and sonaquently it will be a canes the queen having no special knowledge or will on the subject; how does it happen that no drone eggs are found prior to a certain time in the season? If this speculation is correct, then the queen would deposit eggs at any season of the year in drone eclls, where, intermixed with worker cells in the same comb presenting an unbroken surface, drones would be reared at all seasons, if any brood IIISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 55 was reared at all; but this not being the case, is very strong evidence that the theory is at fault, in fact, that it is not true in any sense. LANGSTROTH’S THEORY. Langstroth says: “My friend, Mr. Samuel Wag- oner, has advanced a highly ingenious theory, which accounts for all the facts, without admitting that the queen has any special knowledge or will on the sub- ject. He supposes that when she deposits her eggs in the worker cells, her body is slightly compressed by their size, thus causing the eggs, as they pass the spermatheca, to receive its vivifying influence. On the contrary, when she is laying in drone cells, as this compression cannot take place, the mouth of the spermatheca is kept closed, and the eggs are neces- sarily unfecundated, producing only drones, &c.” This is a very plausible theory, indeed, and in the absence of positive evidence pro or con, it might as well be received (for Buncomb). Yet I must say, I have no faith init. Facts, and further experience and observation, will, I apprehend, demonstrate its fallacy. The seminal sac, as shown by the drawing of the ovaries of the queen, highly magnified, in Lang- stroth’s work, is near the terminus or outer end of the oviduct, consequently very near the hinder part of the queen; now compare the size of this part of the body of the queen with the size of the worker cells, and we find that the particular part where this sac is located could be thrust. to the bottom of the cell without coming in contact with its sides. No pressure o 56 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. could occur until about two-thirds of the abdomen, or the parts behind the thorax, were thrust in ; thus whatever pressure might occur, would be at a point some distance from where this sac is located, and would not necessarily influence it in any respect; in fact no pressure could occur by this process on the part where this seminal sac is located, if the anat- omy of the queen is properly illustrated by Lang- stroth’s microscopic view. There is another fact, however, in the practice of the queen, which, I presume, has been noticed by all apiarians, and is sufficient to show this theory to be incorrect. When a top-swarm, that has the old queen with them, is put in a hive, they immediately com- mence building combs, generally worker cells; the queen follows them and deposits eggs in the cells, when the foundation is laid and the side walls of the cells are not more than one-sixteenth, and certainly not more than one-eighth of an inch high. Is it possible that the abdomen of the queen receives any pressure from the sides of the cells whilst in the act of thrusting her ovipositor into the cell to deposit the egg? Is it probable she would receive any greater pressure, in any possible contingency, in depositing eggs in worker cells than in drone cells, when neither of them is more than one-eighth of an inch deep? Eggs are frequently thus deposited, both in worker and drone cells, the bees continuing to rear the cells until of the proper length. Such a theory is, in my opinion, simply absurd, but well calculated to amuse the ignorant and unobserving. HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 57 At present I shall content myself with believing, that a sufficient portion of the seminal fluid to cause the egg to generate is incorporated with it in its for- mation. The eggs to produce drones or males, are generated in or produced from the one side or branch of the ovaries, and those producing females from the other side. We find that the ovaries are separated into two equal parts (according to Swammerdam, after whom Langstroth copies), having no connec- tion whatever, except that the contents of each branch is discharged through the common oviduct or passage. Over the outlets of the passages or ovi- ducts opening from each of these divisions into the main channel or common oviduct, the queen has full control, and fully understands that eggs from the one division will produce drones and from the other, workers ; and the anomaly of drone-laying queens arises from the imperfect development of that part of the ovaries which produce eggs for workers. This hypothesis may be incorrect, but I trust careful ex- periment will be instituted by various apiarians, that the truth may be fully and fairly demonstrated. THE WORKER BEE, The working or common bees are so often seen, and have become so familiar to almost every one, that a particular de- scription may almost appear unneces- sary; yet for the sake of uniformity, I shall give it, very briefly. They are less in size than either the queen or THE WORKER. 53 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. drones, and the name they have so justly obtained, of working bees, clearly denotes their superior in- dustry in laboring for the whole colony. It is now generally admitted that they are females, whose ova- ries are not sufficiently developed to enable them to become mothers; yet they most undoubtedly possess all the maternal affection and care for the young of the colony, nursing them, so to speak, and sup- plying all their wants; in time of threatened danger they will cling to them, and risk their lives to protect them, as devotedly.as any mother could do for her own offspring. I have never ascertained how many bees are re- quired to constitute what is generally called a good swarm, but authors estimate the number at from fifteen to thirty thousand workers; this, of course, will be varied very much by the season and other cir- cumstances. This estimate would, perhaps, apply to top-swarms from good sized hives. Bonner says that about five thousand workers weigh a pound; if this estimate is correct, it would be easy, on hiving a swarm, to ascertain its numbers, by first weighing the hive and afterward both hive and swarm. DESCRIPTION OF THE WORKER. The common worker bee, as well as the other two varieties of that valuable insect, consists of three parts. The head, which is attached to the thorax by a slender kind of neck; there are two eyes placed in the head, of an oblong figure, dark brown or nearly black, transparent and immovable; the mouth HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 59 or jaws, like those of some species of fish, open to the right and left, and serve instead of hands to carry out of the hive whatever incumbers or offends them ; they are also provided with a proboscis or trunk, with which they suck up honey or any other desired sub- stance, and again deposit it in the combs; it is used at times as a trowel in building combs, placing with it the minute scales of wax in their appropriate places, and giving the desired polish to the cells. The thorax, or middle part between the head and the ab- domen, which is nearly separated from the latter by an insection or division, connected by a very narrow neck or junction; to this four wings, a pair on each side, are attached, by which they are not only enabled to fly with heavy loads, but also to make those well known sounds by which they doubtless communicate with each other, serving as a kind of speech. They have also six legs, three on each side; the foremost pair of these is the shortest—with these they unload the little pellets from the baskets on their thighs; the middle pair is somewhat longer, and the hind- most pair longest of all; on the outside of the middle joint of these last there is a small cavity, in the form of what a Scotchman would call a marrow spoon, by some it is called a basket, in which they collect those loads of pollen which are frequently seen going into the hive, and by many supposed to be wax. This basket or hollow groove in the thigh is peculiar to the worker; neither queen nor drone has any thing of the kind. The belly is composed of six rings or folds, and contains, besides the intes- 60 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. tines of the insect, the honey sac or bladder, the poison sac and the sting. The honey sac is a reser- voir into which is deposited the honey the bee sips from the flowers, passing it through the proboscis and the narrow pipes leading directly to the honey sac; when full it is the size of a small pea, and so transparent that the color of the honey can be dis- tinguished through it; this sac is provided with a set of muscles, by which it is compressed at will. enabling the bee to empty it into the cells. When they get honey in large quantities, and are engaged filling this sac, the rings of the abdomen have a vibra- tory motion, similar to pumping; the sac is entirely separate from the stomach. Every worker is armed and equipped for war, both offensive and defensive; their sting is a small but very effective weapon. Many men would flee from an attack by such weapons, who would scorn to turn their backs upon the bristling bayonet or the death- dealing cannon’s mouth. The sting is provided with minute but very powerful muscles, by means of which the bee can dart it out with force sufficient to pene- trate through the thick skin of a man’s hand. In length it is about the sixth part of an inch, largest at the root, tapering gradually toward the point, which is extremely small andsharp. When examined with a microscope, it appears to be polished extremely smooth, being composed of a horny substance. It is hollow within, like a tube, through which the poison flows when a wound is inflicted. The point of the sting is barbed, so that it is quite impossible for the HISTORY AND PHYSIOLOGY. 61 ~ bee to withdraw it from the wound, but the act of stinging any animal is generally fatal to itself, tearing out, as it were, a part of the entrails with the sting. These workers may be said to compose the whole community, except in the season of the drones, which hardly lasts four months; during the rest of the year there are no others found in the hive than workers and the queen. The whole labor of the hive is per- formed by them; they build the combs, collect the honey, bring it home, and store it up in their waxen magazines; they take charge of the eggs deposited by the queen, and rear therefrom queens, worker bees and drones; they remove all incumbrances from the hives, and defend the community against the attack and encroachments of enemies; they also kill or drive out the drones when their services are no longer necessary: in short, the workers undertake and accomplish everything that is necessary to the welfare of the entire colony, except furnishing eggs to replenish the hive with a succession of young ones to take the place of the superannuated. THE DRONE. The drones are a species of bees well known; in fact so distinctive is the name, that it is frequently applied to designate a certain class of man- kind. The drone can easily be dis- tinguished from the worker bee by its greater bulk and clumsy, uncouth appearance; it is both thicker and longer; its head 6 THE DRONE. 62 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. is round, eggs full, and tongue or proboscis short ; the form of the abdomen or belly is quite different from both queen and worker, the organs of generation being located in the drone where the sting is found in the worker. It makes a much coarser and more boisterous noise when flying, a peculiarity of itself sufficient to recognize it. The drone is now admitted by all writers to be the male bee. the latitude and circumstances, such as have just been referred to. In California the swarming season usually commences early in April; some seasons a few swarms come off in the latter part of March, but this is the exception, not the rule. First swarms frequently fill up their hive and send off one or more swarms the same season; but even there they are governed by the yield of honey, kind of weather, &c. the same as here. All the principal bee-keepers in California have adopted artificial swarming, and seem to prefer it to natural swarming for increasing their stocks, as being more certain and profitable in its results. It is to the interest of bee-keepers to investigate the matter closely, and compare the results of the two systems, in order to adopt the best. Where bees sell readily at one hundred dollars per hive (as has been NATURAL SWARMING. 189 the case ever since bees were introduced into Cali- fornia), the difference of a hive or two, more or less, is quite an important item; hence the decision and the experience of the California apiarians upon this point is worthy of serious and careful consideration by all who are or expect to be engaged in bee-keep- ing. Where dollars and cents in such large quan- tities are so temptingly arrayed before the skillful importers, propagators and dealers in bees, it is very safe to conclude that the shortest road to wealth will be adopted by the majority; the most certain and expeditious method of increasing bees, and keeping them in the most flourishing condition, will be sought out and practiced; and all prejudice and fanciful ideas will be laid aside for the purpose of acquiring the mighty dollar. I think facts justify me in supposing that greater advances have been made by the California bee- keepers, within the last three years, to acquire and perfect a thoroughly practical and reliable system for the management of bees, to obtain the greatest in- crease of stocks and the largest yield of surplus honey in any given period of time, than has been made in all the other States of the Union during the last half century. This may seem somewhat paradoxical; if so, just reflect for a moment that bees at one hundred dollars per colony, and honey at one dollar per pound, is a great temptation to seek for knowledge in bee- keeping; in fact, it has been sought with greater assiduity than the world has ever before seen in apiarian science. 190 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. CAUSE OF SWARMING. Authors do not agree as to the cause of bees swarming. Some suppose it to be for want of room, others think they swarm to avoid the conflicts of the queen, whilst yet others advocate still different theories ; but all such theories, I apprehend, are at fault. I have ever believed swarming to be in strict accordance with the fiat of the Almighty maker of the universe, who said, “Go forth and multiply, and replenish the earth.” Iam far from supposing it to be the result of any forced or unnatural cause, but as simply the instinct given them asa means of extend- ing and perpetuating their species; in fact, in a state of nature it could not possibly be dispensed with; without this means of reproduction the species would soon become extinct. CONDITION OF THINGS NECESSARY FOR SWARMING. When stocks are strong, the bees cluster to the bottom of the combs, and sometimes on the outside. It is necessary there should be a good supply of honey abroad in the fields. A top swarm need never be expected when there is a scarcity of honey. Nature has taught them the danger and folly of attempting to emigrate, and set up house-keeping in a new place, without the assurance of obtaining a fair supply of provision ; indeed, so generally do they observe this precautions, that it almost amounts to the power of reasoning. Warm weather is also necessary for their coming forth. I have frequently known them to swarm when the sun was partially obscured by clouds, NATURAL SWARMING. 191 the atmosphere being warm and fine; in fact, I have thought that a warm day with occasional showers, the sun shining brightly at intervals, is a favorite time for swarms to come off. They seldom attempt to swarm when it is cool and windy. Bonner, who isa very reliable author, remarks on this point: “Some swarms will lie out long before they swarm, though they will swarm at last; others, although they lie out equally long, will not swarm at all; a third class will swarm without the smallest previous appearance, and a fourth will make a bustle about their doors for three or four days before they swarm ; and therefore, from such a variety of chances, it is scarcely possible to determine the precise time of swarming, especially by young beginners in bee- husbandry. A constant attendance is necessary in swarming time, from eight o’clock in the morning until about three or four in the afternoon; and this needs only to be done in fine warm days, as the bees seldom send out a colony in cold or chilly weather.”’ But this is not all that 1s necessary. Embryo queens are always in a state of forwardness to supply the old hive, as the old queen invariably leaves with the first swarm, and to provide queens for any after- swarms. I cannot better describe the process than by quoting from the “ Mysteries of Bee-keeping,” by Mr. Quinby, who is good authority on this point: REQUISITES BEFORE PREPARATIONS OF QUEEN CELLS. “JT have found the process for all regular swarms something like this: Before they commence, two or 192 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. three things are requisite. The combs must be crowded with bees; they must contain a numerous brood advancing from the egg to maturity; the bees must be obtaining honey, either by being fed or from flowers. Being crowded with bees in a scarce time of honey is insufficient to bring out the swarm, neither is an abundance sufficient, without the bees and the brood. The period that all these requisites happen together, and remain long enough, will vary with different stocks, and many times do not happen at all through the season, with some. “These causes then appear to produce a few queen cells, generally begun before the hive is filled.” STATE OF QUEEN CELLS WHEN USED. + “They are about half finished, when they receive the eggs; as these eggs hatch into larva, others are begun, and receive eggs at different periods for sey- eral days later. The number of such cells seem to be governed by the prosperity of the bees; when the family is numerous and the yield of honey abundant, they may amount to twenty, at other times perhaps not more than two or three; although several such cells may remain empty. I have already said that a failure (or even a partial one,) in the yield of honey at any time from the depositing of the royal eggs till the sealing of the cells (which is about ten days), would be likely to bring about their destruction. Even after being sealed, I have found a few instances where they were destroyed.” NATURAL SWARMING. 193 STATE WHEN SWARMS ISSUE. “ But when there is nothing precarious about the honey, the sealing of these cclls is the time to expect the first swarm, which will generally issue the first fuir day after one or more are finished. I never missed a prediction for a swarm forty-eight hours, when I have judged from these sigus, in a prosperous season. When there is a partial failure of honey, the swarm sometimes will wait several days after finishing them.” The surest plan is to occasionally examine-the con- dition of the qucen cells, about the time swarms are expected. This is readily accomplished in our im- proved movable comb hives, by simply lifting out the frames containing the combs; but it can be done in any kind of box hive or gum, by first blowing smoke under the hive; when the bees are driven back a little, invert it, repeating the smoking opera- tion occasionally, to drive the bees from the lower ends of the combs, where the queen cells are usually found. These cells are of an oblong circular form, of considerable thickness, and in appearance rather clumsy; when half made they are not unlike the lower part of an acorn turned upside down; they are gradually lengthened as the royal larva increases in size, and when finished and sealed up, which, as Mr. Quinby states, is about ten days from the egg, are about an inch in length and resemble the end of one’s little finger, minus the nail, and are generally suspended in a perpendicular form from the comb. When queen cells are thus prepared watch your bees 17 194 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. carefully, as without a change of weather a swarm will issue ere long. OTHER SYMPTOMS IMMEDIATEAY PRECEDING THE ISSUING OF A SWARM. If, when the foregoing preparations are made, in the morning of a warm, calm day, you observe one or more strong stocks in the apiary, from which few bees are going forth to the fields in search of honey, whilst other colonies are busily at work, it is a pretty strong symptom of swarming during the day. Ob- servations I have made lead me to think, that the cause of this seeming inactivity is, that they are en- gaged in the interior of the hive taking in provisions, simply packing their trunks for the voyage ; as most authors agree that they fill their sacs with honey before the swarm issues. Here, again, their instinct amounts almost to the point of reasoning, for in case of a delay in finding a suitable home to shelter them, or if a sudden change in the weather should occur soon after it was safely lodged in its new home, so as to prevent them from going forth to gather the needed supplies from the flowers, starvation and the utter destruction of the swarm would be the result; hence the importance of taking a supply of provi- sions before emigrating. Another indication is the generally excited appear- ance of the bees about the entrance of the hive, running to and fro in every direction ; some reeling around in small circles in front and above the hive, apparently anxious for the important event to take NATURAL SWARMING. 195 place, when suddenly the advance guard rushes forth with hurried steps, immediately taking wing and mounting into the air, making a sharp, shrill sound, which can easily be distinguished from those engaged in their usual labor; when, hark! the joyful cry is raised by those on watch: The bees are swarming! which generally produces as much excitement in the bee-keeper’s family as I have described as occurring in the bee family. THE MODUS OPERANDI OF SWARMING. It has already been remarked, that a column or stream of bees rushes forth with the utmost precipi- tation. I have on several occasions carefully observed during this process, to see if the queen leads the swarm, or is the first to leave the hive, as many authors have led us to believe, but am satisfied this is not correct. At various times I observed her majesty come out of the hive greatly excited, and run around on the alighting board, or on the side of the hive, and again pass into the hive, apparently bewil- dered, or being fearful of taking wing; in a few moments she would again make her appearance out- side of the hive. During all this time the bees were rushing out and taking wing with the greatest fury, until the air for a considerable space around and above the hive was completely filled with bees, cir- cling around in every direction. This operation was repeated several times before she took wing, by which time most of the swarm had left, and instead of the queen being the first to leave, she was almost the 196 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. last. On one or two occasions I saw her drop down to the ground, on weeds or grass in front of the hive, seemingly unable to mount up into the air, where, if left to herself, she would most likely have perished, had the returning swarm not discovered her, wlen they immediately commenced clustering around her. In the year 1855, one of our stocks sent forth a swarm, which, after circling around for some time, returned again to the hive from whence it came. It repeated this operation the nextday. I happened to be some distance from the apiary each time the swarm was rapidly returning. When I arrived, I ex- amined carefully in front of the hive until I felt pretty certain the queen had not dropt down on her first attempt to fly ; hence I concluded she remained in the hive, and suspected that from some cause she was unable to fly. To satisfy myself upon this point, I determined to watch the next day about the time they were likely to make the third attempt. I had but a short time to wait until the swarm again began rushing out. After watching for a few moments, a large portion of the swarm having gone forth, the queen came rushing out, first running up the side of the hive, then down and around on the alighting board, in front of the hive, to and fro, very much excited, but made no attempt to fly. I at once discovered one of her wings was deficient. Mean- while the bees kept rushing out as though their very lives depended on their speed, apparently unconscious of the presence of the queen; in fact, in their hurry they passed over and around her with the same indif- NATURAL SWARMING. 197 ference they would if she had been any other object of a similar size. I now lifted the hive from its stand, sct it a little to one side, and put the new hive in which I designed putting the swarm, in its place, still keeping my eye on the motions of the queen, who was running around on the alighting board, where a number of bees remained. In a few minutes the swarm began to return to their old home, as they supposed, having discovered, no doubt, that their queen was not with them; they immediately commenced entering the new hive, in company with the queen, rejoicing at finding her and a new home at the same time. In a few minutes the swarm had nearly all entered the hive, when I removed it to a new stand and set the old hive back in its place again, when all seemed prosperous and happy. Since that time I have twice had occasion to repeat this experiment, with similar results. From these and other facts which will be noticed in their proper place, I conclude that the queen, although absolutely necessary to the welfare of the swarm, is very far from leading and directing it with that pomp and queenly authority that has been so graphically de- scribed and dwelt upon by some authors; but on the contrary, facts justify me in believing that in swarm- ing, as in many other things, the queen is governed or prompted to do or not to do certain things, by the common worker bees. This, I am aware, is assuming new ground, and contrary to the opinion of all authors IT have consulted; hence I ask a careful examination upon this point. 1T* 198 BEES AND BEE-KEEPING. Bonner, in describing the process of swarming, says: ‘ Nothing can surely be more delightful to the bee-master than to behold the young emigrants flying in the air and darkening the sky with a thousand varying lines, passing hither and thither in every direction.” Itis, indeed, surprising to see the young colony leaving their mother hive, deserting it in the utmost hurry and precipitation, insomuch that they can hardly clear the way for each other. (288)