Gornell University Library
Ithaca, Nem York
BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE
THE GIFT OF
HENRY W. SAGE
1891
e date shows when this volume was taken.
To renew this book copy the call No. and give to
the librarian.
HOME USE RULES
All books subject to recall
All borrowers must regis-
ter in the library to borrow
books for home use.
All books must be re-
turned at end of college
year, for inspection and
repairs.
Limited books must be
returned within the four
week limit and not renewed.
Students must return all
books before leaving town.
Officers should arrange for
the return of books wanted
during their absence from
town.
Volumes of periodicals
* and of pamphlets are held
in the library as much as
possible. For special pur-
poses they are given out for
a limited time.
Borrowers should not use
theif library privileges for
the*benefit of other persons.
Books of special value
and gift books, when the
giver wishes it, are not
allowed to circulate.
Readers are asked to re-
port all cases of books
marked or mutilated.
Do not deface books by
marks and writing.
Cornell University Library
Q 115.N86 1898
“wii
3 1924 012
|
281
089
rwegian Arctic ex
|
olin, ovel
Cornell University
Library
The original of this book is in
the Cornell University Library.
There are no known copyright restrictions in
the United States on the use of the text.
http:/Awww.archive.org/details/cu31924012281089
REPORT
OF THE
SECOND NORWEGIAN ARCTIC
EXPEDITION IN THE “FRAM”
| 1898-1902
VOL. III.
PUBLISHED BY
VIDENSKABS-SELSKABET I KRISTIANIA
; KRISTIANIA
IN COMMISSION BY T. 0. BROGGER
PRINTED BY A. W. BROGGER
1911
REPORT
OF THE
SECOND NORWEGIAN ARCTIC
EXPEDITION IN THE “FRAM”
1898—1902
VOL. III.
AT THE EXPENSE OF THE FRIDTJOF NANSEN FUND
FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE
PUBLISHED BY
VIDENSKABS-.SELSKABET I KRISTIANIA
SSS
KRISTIANIA
IN COMMISSION BY T. 0. BROGGER
PRINTED BY A. W. BROGGER
1911
XK
5456
HAA 2%
No. 14.
CONTENTS OF VOL. Ill.
Pau. Buerkan: Ascidien. Mit 1 Tafel. (Gedruckt Méirz, 1908)
Hyatmar Ditrtevsen: Annulata polychaeta. Taf. I—III.
(Gedruckt Miéirz, 1909) .
H. G. Simmons: A Revised List of this Flowering inate atid
Ferns of North Western Greenland, with some short
Notes about the Affinities of the Flora. (With one map in
the text.) (Printed April, 1909) . 2...
Hans Kiar: On the Bottom Deposits fase ‘the Second
Norwegian Arctic Expedition in the “Fram”. (Printed
I WOU kee dy a2 SSP) Ailes dhe dn he os se See 4 I oe
G. O. Sars: Crustacea. (With 12 aati ~plaleay (Printed
Jtines RIO! &. dy aes Ges ee ae a Ga Ak.
H. G, Simmons: Stray (uteintons to the Pointy of Nor th
Devon and some other Islands, Visited in 1900—1902.
With one Map in the text and an alphabetical index to
No. 2. Flora of Ellesmereland, No. 16, Plants of N. W.
Greenland, and this paper. (Printed June, 1909)... . .
James A. Grieg: Brachiopods and Molluscs, with a Suppie-
ment to the Echinoderms. (With a Table.) (Printed
October, 1909).. 2.248 edt nts zo Op ah eat? Ae kc yt
Orro V. Darpisuire: Lichens Collected during the 2nd
Norwegian Polar Expedition in 1898—-1902. With 2
Plates. (Printed October, 1909) .
Cart Buece: Petrographische Resultate der ten Prati
Expedition. (Mitd Tafeln und Karten.) (Gedruckt October, 1910}
Coyrap Fristept: Sponges from the Coast of Ellesmere-
Land. (Printed October, 1909) p fee
Freprik Incvarson: Die Treibhélzer sink dem Hilleswmene:
Land. (Gedruckt June, 1910) . aR
Ap. S. Jensen: Fishes. (Printed December, 1910) .
A. AppeLLér: Pycnogoniden. (Gedruckt November, 1910) . .
H. H. Gran: Phytoplankton. (Gedruckt Februar, 1911)
1— 12
1— 9
1—110
1: 2
1s 47
1— 36
1— 45
i &
1— 38
1S
ey
i+ 5
oe
1— 28
REPORT OF THE SECOND NORWEGIAN ARCTIC EXPEDITION
IN THE “FRAM”, 1898—1902. No. 14.
PAUL BJERKAN:
ASCIDIEN
(MIT 1 TAFEL)
AT THE EXPENCE OF THE FRIDTJOF NANSEN
FUND FOR ‘THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE
PUBLISHED BY
VIDENSKABS-SELSKABET I KRISTIANIA
KRISTIANIA
PRINTED BY A. W. BROGGER
1908
D:: Material ist leider nicht sehr reich an Arten, hat aber in Ver-
bindung mit einer Sammlung nordamerikanischer Ascidien im zoologischen
Museum der Universitat zu Kristiania grosses Interesse, speziell fir die
Ausbreitung vieler Arten. Viele Arten, die im Meere nérdlich von Eu-
ropa ihre Heimat haben oder dort eingedrungen sind, findet man auch
in Grénland und dem arktisch-amerikanischen Archipel oder an der Ost-
-kiste von Nord-Amerika, sogar weit nach Siiden hinein. Wegen der
speziellen Stromverhaltnisse des Eismeeres ist dies ja auch sehr natiir-
lich. Die Eier und Larven der verschiedenen Ascidien lassen sich leicht
mit dem Strome forttreiben, und wenn sie nur die fiir sie geeignete Was-
sertemperatur vorfinden, machen sie ihre Entwicklung durch und wer-
den sesshaft ebensogut weit von der Stelle, wo die Eltern befestigt waren,
als in deren Nahe. Durch die Arbeiten von Travstept (1880) und Hart-
MEYER: (1903) sind viele Arten, die friher vom nérdlichen Europa be-
schrieben worden sind, auch fir Gronland und die benachbarten Meere
nachgewiesen. Viele von diesen sind an den Kisten Nord-Asiens
gefunden, und wenr man sie auch zwischen den Inseln des arktisch-
amerikanischen Archipels findet, hat es keinen Zweck, ihre Zirkumpo-
laritat in Abrede zu stellen.
‘Die Ascidien der 2ten “Fram’-Expedition sind auf 76—79° N. B.
und 75—90° W. L. (Greenwich), in den Sunden und Fyjorden, die von
Smiths Sund gegen Westen und von Jones’ Sund gegen Norden in das
Ellesmere Land eindringen, genommen. Speziell sind durch Dreggen an
den Kusten von Simmons Halbinsel zwischen Gaasefjord und
Helvedesporten viele Ascidien gefunden worden. Im Gaasefjord lag die
“Fram” eingefroren in den zwei Wintern 1900—01 und 1901 --02. Uber
die Meeresfauna dieses Fjords sagt Sverprup!): ,Bay (der Zoologe der
Expedition) erzahlte, dass er niemals an irgend welcher Stelle in den
arktischen Gegenden eine so reiche Fauna gefunden habe. Seine Funde
1 Orro Sverprup, Nyt Land, vy, Il, p. 112.
4 PAUL BJERKAN. [2ND ARC. EXP. FRAM
waren in mehreren Beziehungen itberraschend. Schade nur, dass er
nicht langere Zeit arbeiten konnte.“ Der letzte Passus zeigt, wie schwierig
es ist, in den hocharktischen Gegenden mit der Dregge zu arbeiten. Die
langste Zeit des Jahres deckt das Eis alles, und nur in den Monaten
Juli und August, oder wenn man gliicklich ist, auch einige Tage im Sep-
tember, kann man die See offen finden. Uber die Verhaltnisse der oben
erwahnten Meeresstrasse Helvedesporten kann man in Simmons’ “Rapport’’!)
lesen. Man sieht, wie der Strom hier sehr stark zwischen Jones’ Sund
und der nérdlich hegenden Norskebugt’ zieht, Verhaltnisse, die speziell
fir festsitzende Tiere sehr vorteilhaft sein miissen. Die Schwierigkeiten
beim Dreggen waren aber sehr gross. Eis, Strom und Wind bewirkten,
dass man nur an einzelnen vom Zufall bestimmten Stellen dreggen konnte.
Dass das Material unter diesen Umstanden etwas liickenhaft werden
musste, ist leicht zu verstehen.
Das Material enthalt 6 Arten, die 5 Genera reprasentieren. Alle ge-
héren zu den einfachen Ascidien und trotz sorgfaltiger Untersuchungen
des tibrigen Materials, zum Beispiel der Balaniden, bin ich nicht im
Stande gewesen, irgend eine ,Synascidien“-Kolonie zu finden.
Wenn ich im folgenden die Arten naher bespreche, muss ich bemerken,
dass von Synonymie des Platzes wegen nur das Notwendigste mitgenom-
men ist. Ubrigens verweise ich auf Harrmeyers, »Ascidien der Arktis‘,
wo die Synonymie aller arktischen Ascidien ausfihrlich behandelt ist.
Wenn ich von dem obenerwahnten Verfasser abweiche, wird dies im
Texte ausdricklich bemerkt.
Hinsichtlich der naéheren Angaben der Fundstellen ist auf die Karten
in Isacusen, ,,Astronomical und Geodetical Observations® (No. 5 dieses
»Report“) hinzuweisen*). Um den Gebrauch der Karten zu erleichtern,
schreibe ich wie in diesen Karten die Namen, die von der » Fram “-Expedi-
tion gegeben sind, norwegisch, schicke aber eine Ubersetzung in deutscher
und englischer Sprache voraus:
Gaasefjord = Gansefjord = Geese F jord.
Renbugten = Renntierbucht = Reindeer Bay.
Helvedesporten = Hllenpforte = Hell Gate.
Havnefjord = Hafenfjord = Harbour Fjord.
Norskebugt = Norwegische Bueht = Norwegian Bay.
' Orro Sverprvp, Nyt Land, v. II, p, 374.
? Romer und Scuaupiyy, Fauna Arctica, v. II, 2,
* Dieselben Karten, von Isacusen gezeichnet, sind auch in Orro Svervrup, Nyt
Land, v. III zu finden.
1898—1902, No. 14.] ASCIDIEN. 3)
Fam: Halocynthiidae.
Halocynthia (part.) Verriii, 1879.
Halocynthia arctica (Hartm.)
Syn: Cynthia echinata, Autores.
1879, Halocynthia echinata, Verritt, p. 148.
1903, s arctica, Harrmeyer, p. 190.
Fundstelle:
24 Juli, 1900, Havnefjord, 85 m. (am Winterhafen), 1 Expl.
Diese Art ist von Harrmeyer (1899) von der H. echinata (L) als
spezifisch arktisch ausgeschieden worden. Uber die nahere Synonymie
siehe Hartmeyer (1903, p. 190). Eine dussere Higentiimlichkeit der Art
sind nach dem erwahnten Verfasser die kreisférmig angeordneten Dornen
mit einem langeren, peitschenférmigen Dorn in der Mitte. Ich habe doch
ifters Exemplare vom nérdlichen Norwegen gefunden, die sowohl nach
der Fundstelle als nach der inneren Organisation zu der vorliegenden
Art gehérten, bei denen aber der zentrale Dorn und die regelmissige
Anordnung der Dornen tiberhaupt fehlten. Das einzigste Expl. im Ma-
teriale hatte typische Dornenanordnung, 7 Kiemensackfalten und Dor-
salfalte mit zungenformigen Fortsatzen und ist demnach eine sichere H.
arctica.
Die Art ist friher im arktisch-amerikanischen Archipel, in der Banks-
strasse, von Hartmeyer (1903) nachgewiesen worden, und da sie auch
vom nérdlichen Europa und Asien (Sweperus 1887) bekannt ist, ist sie
somit ganz zirkumpolar.
Halocynthia aurantium (PALt.)
Syn: Cynthia pyriformis (RaruKe), Autores.
1879, Halocynthia ,, Verri.y, p. 147.
1880, Cynthia papillosa, Traustept, p. 407.
1908, Halocynthia aurantium, Harrmeyer, p. 195.
Fundstelle:
24 Juli, 1900, Havnefjord, 85 m. (am Winterhafen), 1 Expl.
Diese arktische Art ist, wie durch zahlreiche Befunde sicher fest-
gestellt worden, zirkumpolar. Die siidlichste Fundstelle ist an der Ost-
kiiste von Nord-Amerika in der Massachusetts Bay (Verrixt, 1871),
wo das kalte Wasser vom Norden eine weite Strecke siidwarts dringt.
6 PAUL BJERKAN. [2nD ARC. EXP. FRAM
An der europiischen Seite des Atlantischen Meeres geht sie nicht siid-
licher als bis Vestfjorden in Norwegen. TRausTEDT (1880) hat sie aber
auch von Island.
Das Exemplar von Havnefjord ist von mittlerer Grosse, durch einen
kurzen Stiel an einem Stein befestigt. Die Dornen sind bei weitem nicht
so regelmissig, weder mit Bezug auf Anzahl noch auf Anordnung, wie
man aus den Beschreibungen herausfinden kann. Nur hie und da wird
man eine Platte finden mit zentralem Dorn, sonst streben die Dornen
nach aussen ohne ausgesprochene Regelmassigkeit. Dasselbe habe ich
bei Exemplaren von den verschiedensten Stellen gefunden. Speziell bei
einigen Expl. von New-Foundland im zoologischen Museum der Universi-
tat zu Kristiania habe ich die Dornen sehr riickgebildet gesehen. Die
Tiere selbst sind gross und wohl ausgebildet, die Dornen aber sind klein
und spéirlich vertreten, in einer Anzahl von 2 auf jeder Platte und
dartiber.
Fam: Styelidae.
Styela Mac Leay, 1824.
Styela rustica (L.)
Syn: 1857, Cynthia rustica, Rink, p. 104.
1871, s monoceros, VERRILL, p. 93.
1879, Halocynthia rustica, Verrity, p. 147.
19038, Styela - Harrmeyer, p. 217.
Fundstellen:
12 Juli, 1901, Bucht bei Landsend, ca. 35 m., 1 Expl.
16 & 30 August, 1901, Gaasefjord, 13 m., 1 Expl. & 8 m., 2 Expl.
Die Synonymie dieser Art ist etwas schwierig, da sie sehr oft mit
anderen verwechselt worden ist. Der erste, der die in Frage kommenden
Arten von Nordwest-Europa klar auseinander gebalten hat, ist J. Krer
(1893). Hartmeyer (1903) hat seine Resultate bestatigt; da aber sein
reiches Material aus den verschiedensten Teilen der nérdlichen Meere
stammte, kamen viele verwandte Arten hinzu, und er fand es notwendig,
die von Krar unter Styela gestellten Arten auf die alten Gattungen
Styela, Dendrodoa und Styelopsis zu verteilen. Letzteres scheint mir
auch sebr berechtigt zu sein, doch ist die Gattung Styelopsis méglicher-
weise elwas schwach fundiert. Mit Riicksicht auf die vorliegende Art
verweise ich auf die Zusaimmenstellung der verwechselten Arten bei
Harrmeyer (1903, p. 222). Packarp’s Styela condylomata (1867, p. 277)
von Labrador mit a square, truncate, corneous projektion between the two
1898 1902, No. 14.| ASCIDIEN. (|
orifices,“ spater von Verrut (1871) als S. monoceres (Moll.) bestimmt wor-
den, ist dieselbe Art. Uberhaupt hat das Horn zwichen den Offnungen den
Verfassern Schwierigkeiten verursacht. Von den vorliegenden Exemplaren
war das eine aus Gaasefjord ohne Horn, hatte aber statt dessen eine
Falte oder Verdickung des Mantels.
Die Art scheint in den Meeresstrassen zwischen Grénland und dem
arktisch-amerikanischen Archipel sehr haufig zu sein, im sibirischen Eis-
meer ist sie auch gefunden worden (HELLER, 1878), wohl aber nicht nérd-
lich von der Beringsstrasse, doch muss sie als zirkumpolar charakterisiert
werden.
Dendrodoa Mac Leay, 1824.
Dendrodoa cylindrica n. sp.
(Fig. 1—6).
Korper: cylindrisch.
Cellulosemantel: vorn gerunzelt, hinten glitter, aber schwach lings-
gestreift.
Tentakel: etwa 16, alternierend von 2 (3) Gréssen.
Flimmerorgan: hufeisenformig.
Kiemensack: alle Falten ausgebildet, aber verschieden stark, 1
intermediares, inneres Liingsgefiiss, die grdssten Felder mit
10—12 Kiemenspalten.
Dorsalfalte: glattrandig, etwas gekraust.
Darm: ziemlich lang, Magen kurz mit Blindsack, gestreift, links etwa
10 Langsstreifen.
Gonade: 4-dstig..
Fundstelle;
12 Juli 1901, Bucht bei Landsend, ca 35 m., 2 Expl.
Die beiden vorliegenden Exemplare. waren an Balanus crenatus
befestigt. Das abgebildete Expl. (Fig. 1) hatte den Mantel in einen Stiel
verlingert, der etwas seitlich vom Korper hinausging. Die Befestigung
geht aber auch etwas auf die rechte Seite, ventral tiber. Das andere Expl.
muss irgendwie im Leben eine Wunde bekommen haben. Auf der linken
Seite war im Mantel ein grosses, rundes Loch mit eingewuchertem Rande,
~ woran der Innenkérper festgewachsen war.
Die Form des Korpers ist kurz cylindrisch, wird jedoch durch den
Stiel etwas schief. Die Runzeln am vordersten Teil sind in der Haupt-
sache peripherisch zu der Ingestionséffnung geordnet, und es ist sehr
wahrscheinlich, dass die meisten durch Kontraktion des Tieres hervor-
8 PAUL BJERKAN. [2ND ARC. EXP. FRAM -
gerufen sind. Das andere Expl. ist auch hinten etwas runzlig. Die Lange
der konservierten Tiere ist etwa 15 mm. Die Farbe ist in Alkohol
weisslichgelb, wahrscheinlich sind sie im Leben etwas rétlich gewesen.
Der Cellulosemantel ist zihe, aber wenig derb.
Die Muskulatur des Innenkérpers ist nur schwach entwickelt,
doch befinden sich in der Nahe der Offnungen deutliche Laings- und Quer-
ziige. In der Muskulatur sind kleine Kalkkérperchen zerstreut (Fig. 5).
Sie reducieren sich mit Salzsiure unter Entwicklung von Kohlensaure (?)
Ob sie Exkretionsprodukte reprasentieren, oder durch Parasiten hervor-
gerufen sind, kann ich nicht entscheiden. Sie sind aber nur in der Mus-
kulatur zu finden. Ich habe dergleichen bei der Familie der Styelidae
friher nicht beobachtet. .
Die Tentakel sind von verschiedener Grédsse. Die Anordnung
scheint an einigen Stellen 2, an anderen 3 Gréssen anzudeuten. -
Das Flimmerorgan hat eingebogene Fligel; die Offnung ist
nach vorn.
Der Kiemensack (Fig. 4) ist wohl entwickelt. Die Ordnung der
Langsgefiisse ist rechts, vorn: .
1, (etwa 10), 1, (7), 1, (8), 1, (4, 1.
In den Falten reduciert sich ihre Anzahl nach hinten derart, dass
zum Beispiel die 4te Falte, wie in Figure zu sehen ist, nur ein Langs-
gefass hat. Die Quergefiasse zeigen 3 Ordnungen: I—II[—II—IN—I
o. s. v. Die Anzahl der Kiemenspalten jedes Feldes ist sehr verschieden,
7—12, hinten am geringsten.
Der Darmkanal (Fig. 2) ist stark gebogen, aber nicht geknickt.
Der Magen ist scharf abgesetzt, der Blindsack und die Falten deutlich
zu sehen. Die 2 obersten Falten gehen langs vom Oesophagus bis zum
Blindsack, die iibrigen gehen mehr schrige. Der After (Fig. 3) mit glat-
tem, ausgebogenem Rande, dorsal eingeschnitten.
Die Gonade ist bei beiden Expl. 4-astig.
Systematisches:
HartMeyer (1903) hat die Arten der arktischen Gattung Dendrodoa
klar auseinander gelegt. Ich finde mit ihm, dass die Berechtigung der
Gattung trotz Herpmans (1883) und J. Kuers (1893) Bedenken nicht
in Abrede zu stellen ist. Erstgenannter unterschatzt tberhaupt den Wert
der Geschlechtsorgane als systematisches Kennzeichen bei der Familie
Styelidae. Dendrodoa bildet unter den arktischen Ascidien einen ausge-
zeichnet gut begrenzten Formenkreis, und die stattliche Anzahl von
8 Arten, die Harrmeyer aufmarschieren lasst, spricht fur sich selbst.
1898—1902. No. 14.] ASCIDIEN. 9
Mit einigem Zweifel stelle ich die neue Art auf nach den 2 mir vor-
legenden Exemplaren. In mehreren Beziehungen sind sie aber von den
bis jetzt beschriebenen Arten der Gattung so verschieden, dass ich bei
dem jetzigen Stand des Wissens iiber Variation und Ausbreitung der
Dendrodoa-Arten sie nicht unter irgend eine andere anbringen kann.
Die alten Arten D. aggregata und D. adolphi sind durch mindestens
2 intermediire Langsgefiisse und viel langeren Magen von der neuen zu
halten. Die 2 Ritterschen Arten haben beide Magen ohne Falten, und
D. uniplicata (Bonnevie, 1896) ist durch fortgeschrittene Rickbildung
der Kiemensackfalten und eigenttimliche Gonade gekennzeichnet. Am
meisten scheint die neue Art mit D. lineata (TRaustept, 1880) und
kiikenthali (HartTMEYER, 1899) gemein zu haben. Von beiden unter-
scheidet sie sich durch die kleine Anzahl der Tentakel, von der ersten
auch durch Mangel an dusseren Langsleisten und durch konstante An-
wesenheit der intermediiiren Lingsgefisse, von der zweiten durch die
Form des Magens und Anzahl Aste der Gonade. Wenn dazu kommt,
dass die beiden Arten bis jetzt nur als Lokalformen fir Spitzbergen und
benachbarte Gegenden bekannt sind, so finde ich es zu bedenklich, die
vorliegenden Tiere mit irgend welcher dieser Arten zu identificieren.
Spatere Befunde werden mdglicherweise die Variationsgrenzen der
in Frage kommenden Arten nach verschiedenen Richtungen hin erweitern.
Zur Zeit ist es aber nicht leicht zu sagen, in welcher Beziehung die
Diagnosen am konstantesten sind.
Styelopsis TRaustepT, 1882.
Styelopsis grossularia (BENEDEN).
Syn: ? 1852, Cynthia gutta, Stimpson, p. 231.
1880, Styela grossularia, Traustept, p. 416.
Fundstelle:
18 Juli 1901, Gaasefjord, ca. 60 m. (an der Miindung) 1. Expl.
Die Art ist friher von Traustepr fiir Grénland nachgewiesen wor-
den. Derselbe Verfasser hat spater (1882), wie mir scheint mit Recht,
sie von Styela ausgeschieden und die neue Gattung Styelopsis gebildet.
Jedenfalls ist sie eher zur Gattung Dendrodoa zu rechnen als zu Styela'.
1 Nachdem dies schon im Druck ist, bin ich durch eine mir von Dr. HarrMeyer
geschickte Arbeit darauf aufmerksam gemacht, dass dieser Autor und Dr.
Micwartsen in ihren jiingsten Arbeiten die vorliegende Art zur Gattung Dendrodoa
rechnen und folglich die Gattung Styelopsis unterdriicken.
10 PAUL BJERKAN. (2ND ARC. EXP. FRAM
Das Exemplar unter dem Materiale der ,Fram“ war an B. crenatus
befestigt, ist sehr klein, nur 3mm. Diameter und wenig abgeflacht, etwa
so hoch wie breit.
Die Art ist mehr subarktisch, als arktisch, ist jedoch wahrscheinlich
zirkumpolar, da sie von beiden Seiten gegen das offene Meer nordlich
der Beringsstrasse vordringt.
Wegen eines alten Exemplares der Cynthia gutta unter dem frither
erwihnten Materiale im Universitatsmuseum zu Kristiania habe ich diese
Art als fragliches Synonym aufgenommen. Ich hoffe durch genaue
Untersuchung die Sache entscheiden zu kénnen. Jedenfalls ist das Exem-
plar der Sammlung ein Styelopsis, und da es, wie es scheint, von Stimpson
selbst nach Kristiania geschickt ist, muss es ein sicheres Kriterium ab-
geben fiir die Stellung der zweifelhaften C. gutta. Hartmeyer (1908)
hat die Stimpsonische Art als unsicheres Synonym fiir D. aggregata (juv.)
aufgenommen, wahrscheinlich auf Grund von Verritts Behauptung
(1871, p. 95), dass es eine junge C. carnea sei.
Fam: Ascidiidae.
Ascidia Linnté 1767.
Ascidia prunum Mutt.
(Fig. 7—8).
Syn: Ascidia complanata, Autores.
1852, i, callosa Stimpson, p. 228.
1872, Ascidiopsis complanata, Verret, p. 289.
1903, Ascidia prunwm, Hartmeyer, p. 285.
Fundstellen:
24 August, 1898, Rice Strait, 1 Expl.
20 September, 1900, Gaasefjord, 6—40 m. (am Winterhafen), Lehm
und Steinchen, 1 Expl.
8 Juli, - 1901, Renbugten, Helvedesporten, 4 Expl.
12 =~, 1901, Bucht bei Landsend, ca. 65 m, mehrere Expl.
| 1901, Gaasefjord, 60 m. (an der Miindung),
30, 1901, Gaasefjord, 8 m., Lehm und Steinchen mit
Braunalgen, Mehrere Expl.
Wie aus einer fritheren Arbeit (1905) hervorgeht, bin ich mit Hart-
MEYER von der Identitét der A. prunum und complanata iberzeugt.
Dass A. callosa Stipes. und Ascidiopsis complanata und complanatus
von VeErRRILL, dieselbe Art ist, habe ich im zoologischen Museum zu Kri-
stiania Gelegenheit gehabt, zu konstatieren. Dort befinden sich nimlich
1898—1902. No. 14.] ASCIDIEN. 11
Stimpsonische Exemplare der A. callosa, nebst Expl. der Ascidiopsis
complanata, die dem Museum durch die U. S. Fish. Commission zuge-
gangen sind, und diese stimmen ganz mit der vorliegenden Art iiberein.
Der spezielle Bau des Kiemensackes, der VeRRILL zur Aufstellung der
neuen Gattung bewogen hat, ist von ihm (1. c. fig. 8) abgebildet worden.
Man kann diesen aber bei jedem erwachsenen Tier finden, wenn man
den Kiemensack von aussen ansieht.
Unter dem Materiale der ,Fram“ befanden sich viele Exemplare der
Art; oft waren sie aggregiert. Die gréssten sind bis 9 cm. lang bei einer
Breite von 6 cm. An B. crenatus waren oft sehr kleine Expl., nur bis
® mm. lang, befestigt. Bemerkenswert ist bei den grésseren Tieren die
enorme Entwicklung des Darmes. Oft war die ganze linke Seite des |
Innenkérpers davon eingenommen. Zwischen dieser Extremit&ét und der —
gewohnlichen Grésse des Darmes waren die schénsten Uberginge zu
finden.
Man findet bei den verschiedenen Verfassern die Anzahl der Kiemen-
spalten jedes Feldes fiir eine und dieselbe Art verschieden angegeben.
So hat Hartmeyer (1903, p. 286) fir A. prunum 5—7 (—12) Spalten
als Norm herausgefunden. Es zeigt sich bei meinem Materiale, dass
man von den verschiedenen Stellen des Kiemensackes sehr verschiedene
Zahlen erhalten kann. Nach der Grésse des Tieres sind auf der rechten
Seite, vorn (Fig. 7) 2—12, auf der linken Seite, hinten (Fig. 8) 5—24
Kiemenspalten in jedem Felde zu finden. Dieselben Verhiltnisse habe
ich auch bei anderen Arten bemerkt. Ist dies konstant, so ist es
bemerkenswert. Man darf behaupten, dass es eine Anpassung ist, um
gleich schnellen Ablauf des Kiemenwassers auf jeder Seite zu bewerk-
stelligen. Speziell, wenn der Darmkanal und die Geschlechtsorgane sehr
entwickelt sind, miissen sie die Peribranchialhéhle der linken Seite be-
deutend verengern und das Durchfliessen des Wassers durch die Kiemen-
spalten in hohem Grade hemmen.
PAUL BJERKAN. ASCIDIEN,
1905,
1893,
1899,
1903,
1878,
1883,
1893,
1867,
1857,
1852,
1887,
1880,
1882,
1871,
1872,
1879,
Liste der citierten Ascidien-Literatur.
Buerkan, P., Ascidien von ,,M. Sars“ 1900—04 gesammelt (Bergens Museums
Aarb. 1905, 5).
Bonnevis, K., Ascidie simplices and Ascidiz composite. (Norske Nordh. Exp.
1876—78, v. VU, 2).
Harrmeyver, R., Monascidien der Bremer-Exp. nach Ostspitzbergen 1889. (Zool.
Jahrb. Syst., v. XII).
- Die Ascidien der Arktis (Fauna arctica, v. III, 2).
Heuer, C. Die Crustaceen, Pycnogoniden und Tunicaten der ést.-ung. Nordpol-
Exp. (Denkschr. Ak.-Wien, v. 35).
Hervman, W. A., Report on the Tunicata of H. M.S. ,,Challenger“ 1873—76, I.
(Rep. Voy. Challenger, v. V1).
Kiar, J, Oversigt over Norges Ascidie simplices. (Forh, Vid-Selsk. Kristiania
1893, 9).
Pacxarp, A. S., On the recent Inverterbrate Fauna of Labrador. (M. Boston
Soc., v. I).
Rin, H., Gronlands sjopunge. (Nat. Tilleeg geogr. og stat. Beskr. Gronland, v. II).
Srimeson, W., Some remarks of Ascidians found in Mass. Bay. (P. Boston
Soce., v. IV).
Swepervus, M. B., Tunicater fran Sibiriens Ishaf och Beringshaf. (Vega Exp.
v. IV). :
Traustept, M P. A., Oversigt over de fra Danmark og nordl. Bilande kjendte
Ascidiew simplices. (Medd. Vid. Foren. 1879—80).
- Vestindiske Ascidie simplices, I. (Medd. Vid. Foren. 1881—82).
Verritt, A. E., Description of some imperfectly known and new Ascidians from
New England. (Am. Journ. Sc. & Arts, ser. III, v. 2).
_ Molluscan Fauna of New England. (Am. Journ. Se. & Arts, ser.
Ill, v. 3).
= Molluscoids. (Bul. U. S. Nat. Mus., 15).
Fig. 1—
Fig. 7—
Dr D PN we wr Hr
Tafelerklarung.
Dendrodoa cylindrica n. sp.
Das ganze Tier von links gesehen (+).
Innenkérper 6 as 8 (3).
After (4).
Teil des Kiemensackes von innen gesehen (3°).
Eigentiimliches Kalkkérperchen von der Muskulatur (335).
Gonade (3).
Ascidia prunum.
Teil des Kiemensackes der rechten Seite, von innen gesehen (5).
Teil des Kiemensackes der linken Seite, von innen gesehen (5°).
Rep.of the 24 Norwe$. Arct.Exped.in the Fram 1898-1902.No. 14. Taf. I.
Paul Bjerkan gez.
REPORT OF THE SECOND NORWEGIAN ARCTIC EXPEDITION
IN THE “FRAM” 1898—1902. No. 15.
HJALMAR DITLEVSEN:
ANNULATA POLYCHAETA
AT THE EXPENCE OF THE FRIDTJOF NANSEN FUND
FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE
PUBLISHED BY
VIDENSKABS-SELSKABETIKRISTIANIA
(THE SOCIETY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES OF KRISTIANIA)
‘-: —
-———- —- 000-——
KRISTIANIA
PRINTED BY A. W. BROGGER
1909
Ba den von ,Fram* eingesammelten polychaeten Chaetopoden
Kkniipft sich das Interesse in erster Reihe an die Formen, von welchen
eine grosse Anzahl erbeutet worden ist, und an die Aufschliisse tiber
deren Variieren und Biologie, die man hierdurch gewinnt. Ich will in
dieser Beziehung die beiden einander nahestehende Species Harmothoé
imbricata (L.) und Harmothoé rarispina Sars nennen, auf deren gegen-
seitige Verwandtschaftsverhaltnisse neues Licht geworfen wird. Nicht
weniger interessant sind einige eigentimliche Individuen von Dasychone
infarcta. Ubrigens ist aber die Zahl der erbeuteten Arten keine geringe,
in allem betragt sie 44. Und selbst wenn unter ihnen keine fir die
Wissenschaft neue Formen sich finden, gibt es doch mehrere seltene
und weniger haufig vorkommende Formen; von solchen will ich hier
nur die grossen, schénen Individuen von Melenis Loveni MaLmcREN —
in dem Gansefjord erbeutet — nennen und ein Exemplar von Anaitis
Wahlbergi Matmeren, welches an Grésse die von MatmGren erwahnten
spitzbergischen Individuen wbertrifft und das auch in Beziehung zur
Form der Borsten etwas von diesen abweicht.
Ss
HJALMAR DITLEVSEN. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
Polynoide.
Nychia cirrosa Pau.
1865. Maumeren: Overs. af Kgl. Vet. Akad. Forh. p. 58.
Lokalitat:
Aug. 4. 1898. Upernivik 20 Mt.
Juli 91. 1899. Der Winterhafen, Havnefjord 16 Mt.
Aug. 4, 1900. Der Tintenfisch-Grund 20—80 Mt.
Aug. 8. 1900. Der Winterhafen c. 30 Mt.
Septbr. 20. 1900. Der Winterhafen, Havnefjord 9—40 Mt. Lehm und
Steinchen.
Juli 12. 1901. Die Bucht bei Landsend.
Ein Teil der vorliegenden Exemplare weicht etwas von der typi-
schen Form ab, dadurch, dass die Skulptur der Oberflache der Elytren
im ganzen mehr robust ist; sie scheinen in der Beziehung mit einigen
nordgrénlandischen Formen, von Moore! erwahnt, tbereinzustimmen.
Moore erwahnt dies Verhaltnis in folgender Weise: ,The elytra are
rougher than those figured by Matmcren and M’InTosn, the numerous
papilla being rough, horny, and spinous of the tip. The specimens
from Cape York are covered with ,ochreous deposit* mentioned by
M’Inrosu, which appears to be derived from the bottom soil*. Ebenso
sind mehrere von ,Fram’s* Exemplare mit einem solchen _,,ochreous
deposit“ bedeckt, welches sich in reichlicher Menge in den verzweigten Aus-
wiichsen hauft, die die Oberflache des Elytrons bei dieser Art charak-
terisieren. Eins der Individuen wurde in einem aus kleinen Steinen
gebauten Rohrchen gefunden, wahrscheinlich einem Telepus circinnatus
oder einer Scione lobata gehérig; es ist scheinbar langlicher und von
schlankerer Form als die wtbrigen; wahrscheinlich hat ihn der enge
Raum in dem Rohrchen gehindert, sich bei der Konservierung so sehr
zusammenzuziehen, wie sonst geschehen wire.
1 Proc. of the Acad. of Nat. Sc. of Philadelphia 1902, p. 259.
1898—1902. No. 15.] ANNULATA POLYCHAETA. a)
Harmothoé nodosa (Sars).
1865. Ennoé Orstedi: Ma.meren 1. c. p. 61.
1865. Ennoé nodosa: Matoren |. c. p. 64.
1879. Polynoé scabra: Twier, K. Sv. Vet. Akad. Hand]. Vol. XVI p.7.
Lokalitat:
Aug. 4. 1900. Landspitze der Seewalzen 30—50 Mt. Steinchen.
Juni 26, 1901. Gegeniiber dem Zeltplatz.
Juli 8. 1901. Renntier-Bucht.
Juli 15. 1902. Dem Havhestefjeld gegeniiber.
Diese Form scheint sehr zu variieren, und es ist versténdlich, dass
sie die Bildung mehrerer Arten veranlasst hat. Unter den von ,,Fram“
mitgebrachten Exemplaren sind — ein kleines [ndividuum ausgenom-
men, welches nur noch wenig entwickelt ist — augenscheinlich drei
verschiedene Typen. Beziiglich der Grésse ubertreffen die Individuen
von der Seewalzenspitze weit die ibrigen; das grdsste davon misst in
der Lange 90 mm., in der Breite (mit den Borsten) 38 mm., und scheint
am nachsten mit dem von WireEn ! erwahnten ersteren Typus tiberein-
zustimmen, welcher mit Polynoé nodosa Sars identisch sein sollte.
Das Exemplar von der Renntier-Bucht entspricht am nichsten dem
Typus 4 von Whrren, wihrend das vor dem Zeltplatze entnommene
Exemplar dem Typus 2 desselben Verfassers ahnlich ist, oder vielleicht
vielmehr einer Zwischenform zwischen Typus 1 und 2.
Harmothoé badia THEEL. |
1878. Kgl. Sv. Vet. Akad. Handl. Vol. XVI. p. 18.
Wahrend H. Sarsi gianzlich fehlt, findet man diese Art in zwei
Exemplaren, beide von dem Giansefjord, eins im September 20, 1900,
das andere ein Jahr nachher, Aug. 8, 1901, erbeutet. Das grésste Expl.
misst in der Lange c. 55 mm., das kleinere c. 45 mm.
Harmothoé rarispina (Sars).
1860. Polynoé rarispina, Sars: Forh. Vidensk. Selsk. Christiania 1860, p. 60.
1865. Lagisca rarispina, Matmeren |. ¢. p. 65.
Lokalitat:
Septbr. 19. 1900. Vor dem Verbannungsthale 4—40 Mt.
Septbr. 20. 1900. Géansefjord 6—40 Mt. Lehm und Steinchen.
Juli 9. 1901. Die Renbucht
Juli 18, 1901. Die Miindung des Génsefjords 2—4 Mt. Lehm und
Steinchen.
Aug. 9, 1901. Ganz hinten in dem Gansefjord.
Aug. 80. 1901. Géansefjord 8 Mt. Lehm und Steinchen.
1 Wintn: Vega-Exp. vetenskapl. iakttagels. II. 1883, p. 388.
6 " HJALMAR DITLEVSEN. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
Wie bekannt machte Matmoren sein Gattung Lagisca u.a. davon
abhangig, dass der hintere Teil des Riickens nicht von den Elytren
bedeckt wird: dorsum totum, segmentis circiter X ultimis exceptis, tegen-
tia“, 1. ¢. p. 65. Spatere Verfasser scheinen doch nicht die Berechti-
gung dieses Gattung anzuerkennen: Wren (1. c. p. 389) und Tuer
(l.c. p. 8) fahren es unter dem Geschlechtsnamen Polynoé ein, andere,
z. B. Levinsen! unter dem Geschlechtsnamen Harmothoé. LEVINSEN,
dessen Systematik ich in dieser Beziehung folge, schreibt |. c. p. 29:
»Um iiber die Verwirrung und Ungewissheit hinauszukommen, die
augenblicklich in der Systematik dieser Formen herrscht, schlage ich
vor, bei der Geschlechtsbegrenzung besonders Gewicht auf die Formen
der Riickenborsten zu legen, die im Gegensatz zu den Bauchborsten eine
sehr geringe oder fast keine Variation darbieten, weder bei dem einzelnen
Individ noch bei Gruppen verwandter Arten. So sind die Riickenborsten
wesentlich vom selben Bau bei allen Formen, die zu den Geschlechtern
Harmothoé, Evarne, Antinoé, Lenilla, Lagisca, Ennoé, Parmenis
und Eucrante gerechnet werden, kurz bei all den Geschlechtern, die
weder durch die Form der Borsten noch das Verhaltnis der Riicken-
platten scharf auseinander zu halten sind. Fir dies so durch eine
Zusammenschmelzung der eben genannten 8 Geschlechtern gebildete
Geschlecht schlage ich vor den Namen Harmothoé zu behalten, da der
Name Polynoé fir Polynoé scolopendrina beizubehalten ist, welcher
mit der Beschreibung Savienys zu slimmen scheint“.2 E
Beziiglich der vorliegenden Art werde ich nun gleich bemerken,
dass ich den Charakter mit den hinteren von den Elytren unbedeckten
Ringen nicht konstant finde, indem unter den von ,Fram“ mitgebrachten
Exemplaren tbrigens typische Individuen sich finden, wo der Ricken
in seiner ganzen Lange bedeckt ist, ganz wie bei der folgenden Art.
Auch in Bezug auf die auf den Elytren sitzenden Kérperchen wechselt
die Art, eine Tatsache, welche auch von Wirkn erortert ist, der
schreibt: lc. p. 389: ,hvilka: afvika fran den vanliga formen derut-
innan, att fjallens taggar fran smal bas blifva betydligt tjockare mot
midten, t. 0. m. aggformiga“. Unter den Exemplaren ,,Frams“ finde
ich einen ganz allmahlichen Ubergang von solchen Kérperchen auf den
Elytren, die fir die Art rarispina typisch sind, zu solchen, die bei der
Art imbricata gewohnlich und fir dieselbe typisch sind. Ich habe
deshalb in meiner Bestimmung der in der »framsammlung“ vorliegen-
1 Levinsen: Systematisk, geografisk Oversigt over de nordiske Annulata, Gephy-
rea, Chetognathi og Balanoglossi, Kobenhavn 1883.
2 Von dem Verfasser dieser Abhandlung in’s Deutsche tibersetzt.
1898—1902. No. 15.] ANNULATA POLYCHAETA. 7
den Exemplare, nur die Formen zu 4H. rarispina hinzugerechnet,
deren Kérperchen auf den Riickenplatten dem Ausdruck Matmcrens:
»spinis, raris brunneis, elongato fusiformibus aut cylindricis“ entsprechen.
Harmothoé imbricata (L.).
1865. Maumeren |. c. p. 66.
Lokalitat:
Aug. 16. 1898, Reindeer Point, Foulke Fjord 4—20 Mt.
Aug. 18. 1898. Camp Clay. Cap Sabine 4—10 Mt.
Aug. 24. 1898. Rice Strait.
Juli 21. 1899. Winterhafen, Havnefjord 16 Mt.
Juli 29. 1899. Winterhafen, Havnefjord 12 Mt.
Juli 22, 1900. Winterhafen, Havnefjord c. 60 Mt.
Juli 28. 1900. Winterhafen, Havnefjord c. 40 Mt.
Juli 25, 1900. Winterhafen, Havnefjord.
Juli 30. 1900. Miindung des Grosstals.
Juli 31. 1900. Gegend von Vestersund.
Aug. 3. 1900. Fosheims Peak und das Tal an der Westseite des
Fjords 4—40 Mt.
Aug. 4. 1900. Tintenfisch-Grund 30—40 Mt.
Septbr. 19. 1900. Vor dem Verbannungstale 4—20 Mt.
Septbr. 20. 1900. Boden des Gansefjords 6—40 Mt.
Juli 12. 1901. Bucht bei Landsend.
Aug. 30. 1901. Géansefjord c. 8 Mt.
Juli 15. 1902. Havhestefjeld gegeniiber.
Juli 17. 1902. Ostlich von dem grossen Gletscher, North Devon
c. 6 Mt.
Aug. 4, 1902. Géansefjord, nérdlich von der Halbinsel 20—40 Mt.
Unter den vielen vorliegenden Exemplaren. dieser Art finden sich
verschiedene Varietéten in Bezug auf Form, Grésse und nicht am
wenigsten in Bezug auf das Verhiltnis der Rickenplatten. Die Bemer-
kungen Moore’s |. c. p. 270 uber einige nordgrénlandische Individuen
gelten in dieser Beziehung auch fir die von ,Fram“ eingesammelten :
»The elytra vary from those without any trace either of horny papille
or soft marginal papillee to very rough ones with numerous hard promi-
nences easily visible under a magnification of five diameters — —“.
Und — wie ich in der Erwahnung der vorhergehenden Art bemerkt
habe — was die grésseren Korper auf den Elytren betrifft, findet man
einen vollstindig allmahlichen Ubergang von den tranenformigen oder
fast kugelférmigen, die fir diese Art charakteristisch sind, zu den
langen, cylindrischen bei H. rarispina. Es gibt in Fram’s Material
Individuen, die man — nach der Form dieser Kérperchen — ebensogut
zu rarispina als zu imbricata rechnen kann (Fig. 4). Die Form
der Korper des in Fig. 1 abgebildeten Elytron muss man wohl am
besten als typisch fir H. imbricata betrachten, wahrend Figg. 2 u. 3
8 HJALMAR DITLEVSEN. [sEc. ARC. EXP. FRAM
dem rarispina entspricht; bei Fig. 2 haben die Kérperchen die Form,
welche Matmcren mit dem Ausdruck fusiforme“ bezeichnet. Wie man
sehen wird, liegen die in Fig. 4 abgebildeten Kérperchen so zu sagen
gerade dazwischen und entsprechen wahrscheinlich denen, die Wtr&En,
(I. c. p. 389) einige sibirische rarispina-Formen betreffend, erwahnt.
Es wird sich also schwierig — wenn nicht etwa unméglich zeigen, die
Form dieser Kérperchen als entscheidendes Artkennzeichen zu benutzen.
Noch mehr tiberzeugt hiervon wird man durch die naéhere Betrachtung
des Aussehens dieser Kérperchen: Untersucht man sie bei starkerer
Vergrésserung, kommt man namlich zu dem Ergebnis, dass die grossen
Korper durch Hypertrophie von den kleinen, mikroskopischen Korperchen
gebildet scheinen. Fig. 5 stellt ein kleines Stiick von einem Elytron
eines H. imbricata dar, 125 mal vergréssert. Man sieht hier die
kleinen mikroskopischen Kérperchen, dornenahnlich, mit einer stumpfen
Spitze, ein wenig schief dreieckig im optischen Durchschnitt, gegen die
Flache des Elytrons schrég gestellt. Zwar sieht man von ihrer Struktur
nicht viel, doch findet man eine deutliche, recht dicke, homogen aus-
sehende Hautschicht — méglicher Weise eine Cuticula um einen inneren
Hohlraum, der mit einer structurlosen und farblosen Masse gefillt
scheint, Zellen werden nicht unterschieden; und eine absolute Entschei-
dung des Baues dieser Korperchen wird kaum zu erlangen sein ausser
durch histologische Untersuchung von Schnittpraéparaten, aber hierzu
wire ein in dieser Hinsicht konserviertes Material nodtig. Betrachten |
wir einen der grésseren Korper, so sehen wir, dass dieser mit der-
selben strukturlosen klaren Hautschicht bedeckt ist, wie die kleinen,
mikroskopischen Korper, aber das innere sehen wir mit einer braun-
lichen Masse gefiillt, die gegen das aussere des Kéorpers mit eigen-
timlichen, schuppenformigen Flecken hervortritt. Diesen Bau sieht man
iiberall bei den grésseren Kérpern, unangesehen welche Form diese im
iibrigen haben. Betrachtet man nun die kleinen Kérper, so sieht man,
dass einzelne von diesen, innerhalb der homogen aussehenden Haut-
schicht, an der Spitze dunkelbraun werden, die dunkle Farbe breitet
sich nach und nach abwarts gegen die Basis, tiber den Inhalt des ganzen
Kérpers aus, wahrend dieser gleichzeitig die obenerwahnte gefleckte Zeich-
nung, die bei den grésseren Kérpern zu sehen ist, zu zeigen anfingt;
jetzt fangt der kleine Kérper zu wachsen an; er wird dick an der Spitze,
nach und nach tranen- oder spindelférmig, oder er entwickelt sich zu
einem langen, cylindrischen Pflock, wie bei H. rarispina. Auf Fig. 5
sind mehrere dieser Stadien zu sehen, und fallt einem erst mal das
Geschilderte auf, so scheint es ganz ohne Zweifel, dass die grossen und
1898-1902. No. 15.] ANNULATA POLYCHAETA. 9
grisseren Knoten durch Hypertrophie von einzelnen kleinen, mikrosko-
pischen Kérpern gebildet sind. Was diese Hypertrophie verursacht, ist
natiirlich nicht leicht zu sagen, der Gedanke, das kénne etwas patolo-
gisches, vielleicht parasitisches sein, hegt ja nahe; das ist darum
interessant, da dann diese Knoten und Pflicke — wenn meine
Auffassung die richtige ist — also wohl ohne systematische Bedeutung
sein werden. Eine weitere Beobachtung, welche bei dieser Auffassung
auch verstandlich wird, ist das ganz launenhafte Auftreten dieser erwahnten
Kérper: Man trifft Individuen, denen sie ganzlich fehlen, man_ trifft
Individuen mit einzelnen oder wenigen Kérpern zerstreut auf der Ober-
fliche des Elytrons, und man trifft einen Teil dieser Oberfliche ganz
dicht mit ihnen bes&et. Sie scheinen immer nahe am Rande des Ely-
trons am dichtesten zu sitzen, und scheinen auf demjenigen Teil des
Elytrons, der von dem vorangehenden gedeckt wird, gar nicht — oder
wenigstens dusserst sparsam zu finden zu sein. Sind es Parasiten,
die durch Invasion in die mikroskopischen Kérper dieselben zur Hyper-
trophie bringen, so kann man sich ja sehr wohl denken, dass die verschie-
dene Form der Geschwiire durch mehrfache Arten von einander nahe-
stehender, parasitischer Formen verursacht ist. Aber deshalb brauchen
die Wirttiere ja nicht von verschiedener Art zu sein. Soweit ich sehen
kann, kénnen die Borsten auch nicht als konstante Artscharaktere
zwischen H. imbricata und H. rarispina benutzt werden. Die Figg.
1a und 1b stellen zwei Bauchborsten desselben Individuums dar, dessen
Elytron von Fig. 1 genommen wird. Wie man sehen wird, hat das
eine (Fig. 1a) einen Zahn unter der Spitze, das andere keinen. Die
etwas verschiedene Form riihrt von dem verschiedenen Platze, den die
zwei Borsten in dem Paropodium gehabt haben, her: Die in Fig. 1b
abgebildete Borste, deren dussere, breite Teil verhaltnismassig kirzer
und scharfer abgesetzt von dem Schafte ist, hat ganz ventral gesessen,
wahrend Fig. 1a eine Borste darstellt, die dem Riickenbund am nachsten
gesessen hat. Die Fig. 2a und 2b entsprechen dem Riickenblatt, wovon
ein Teil in Fig. 2 abgebildet ist, also eine Rarispina-Form mit spindel-
formigen Kérpern. Keine der zwei Borsten ist wesentlich von denen
in Fig. 1a und 1b abgebildeten verschieden; beide haben einen Zahn
unter der Spitze, in Fig. 2a ist er sehr abgeniitzt, doch immer noch
deutlich. Fig. 3a und 3b gehdren demselben Individuum an, welchem
das Elytron, von dem ein Teil in Fig. 3 abgebildet ist, gehért. Auch
diese variieren nicht nennenswert. Fig. 3b hat keinen Zahn unter der
Spitze, aber wie wir gesehen haben, trifft man auch Borsten ohne Zahn
bei typischen H. imbricata-Formen. Endlich stellen Figg. 4a und 4b
10 HJALMAR DITLEVSEN. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
Bauchborsten dar von einem Individuum, welches, wie aus Fig. 4
zu sehen ist, in Bezug auf das Verhaltnis der Kérper, eine Zwischen-
form zwischen den typischen H. rarispina und H. imbricata bildet;
auch diese Borsten zeigen ganz dieselbe Form. — Ich werde noch hinzu-
fiigen, dass Moore (I. c. p. 269) meint, in der Stellung des vorderen
Augenpaares ein fir H. rarispina charakteristisches Artkennzeichen
gefunden zu haben. Er schreibt: ,The anterior pair of eyes is borne
on the anterior face of prominently outstanding lobes, which give to
the head a very characteristic form not shown in any of the published
figures. These ocular lobes are situated slightly posterior to the middle
of the head, which is very much narrower anterior than posterior of
them“. Doch auch diesen Charakter finde ich nicht konstant. Erstens
scheinen die erwahnten ,ocular lobes“ bei den verschiedenen Individuen
an Grésse ziemlich viel zu variieren, ebenso wie die Stellung der Augen
(des vorderen Augenpaares) auch nicht immer ganz dieselbe ist im Ver-
haltmis zu diesen ,lobes“: Sie kénnen ganz dorsal sitzen, aber auch
etwas gegen die Seite des Kopfes hin, ferner kénnen sie der Spitze des
erwahnten Vorsprunges naher oder ferner sitzen, was vielleicht von den
verschiedenen Zusammenziehungsverhaltnissen der verschiedenen Indi-
viduen herriihren mag. Doch zuletzt finde ich ganz ahnliche Vorspriinge
bei H. imbricata. Es wird somit meiner Ansicht nach kaum weiteres
zu tun sein, als zuktinftig die zwei Formen H. rarispina (Sars) und
Hf. imbricata (L.) unter dem Namen H. imbricata (L.) zu vereinen,
indem H. rarispina kaum noch als Varietat zu behaupten sein wird.
Melznis Loveni Mern.
1865. Matmeren, ]. ¢. p. 78.
1883. Wirén, 1. c. p. 391.
Lokalitat:
Septbr. 19. 1900. Vor dem Verbannungstale 4—40 Mt.
Septbr. 20. 1900. Géansefjord 6—40 Mt. Lehm und Steinchen.
Die vorliegenden Individuen sind typische Formen und stimmen
genau mit der Beschreibung Matmeren’s tiberein, jedoch mit derselben
Einschrankung, die Wirtn fir die typischen Exemplare der Vega-
expedition anfihrt, namlich dass die 3 letzten Ringe von den Ricken-
platten unbedeckt sind. Das grdsste Exemplar hat eine Lange von
73 mm., das kleinste von c. 60 mm.
1898—1902. No. 15.] ANNULATA POLYCHAETA. 11
Sigalionide.
Pholoé minuta (Fasr.).
1865. Matmeren, }. c. p. 89.
Es hegt nur ein ganz kleines Individuum von etwa 5 mm. Lange
vor; es ist im Aug. 26, 1898, erbeutet, ist aber mit keiner Lokalitat
bezeichnet. Nach dem Zeitpunkt, wann es genommen ist, stammt es
von einer Stelle in Smiths Sund, wahrscheinlich von Rice Strait oder
da in der Nahe.
Phyllodocide.
Phyllodoce maculata (L.).
1865. Mazmeren, |. c. p. 94—98.
1883, Levinsen, 1. c. p. 48.
Lokalitat:
Aug. 1. 1900. Mindung des Grosstals 4—60 Mt.
Juli 19. 1901. Gansefjord.
Aug. 16. 1901. Gansefjord c. 15 Mt.
Aug. 2. 1902. Ganz hinten im Gansefjord 2—4Mt. Lehm und Steinchen.
Aug. 4. 1902. Gdénsefjord, Nérdlich von der Halbinsel 20—30 Mt.
Die vorliegenden Individuen sind durchgehend klein; das kleinste
misst nur c. 60 mm. in der Lange. Eins davon zeigt recht sonderbare
Verhiltnisse, namlich dasjenige von der Miindung des grossen Tales: es
misst in der Linge 275 mm., und darf also sehr lang genannt werden ;
und es zahlt c. 350 Segmente; der hintere Teil macht den Eindruck
regeneriert zu sein, und die letzten Segmente hier sind schwierig genau
zu zahlen; aber dieser Lange entspricht keine verhaltnissmassige Dicke,
indem die Breite des Thieres nicht mehr als 4mm. misst. Sonst scheint
nichts merkwirdiges an seinen Bau zu sein. Die Papillen des Rissels
sind wie bei den itibrigen Individuen, in Bezug auf Form, Grésse und
Arrangement; die Verhaltnisse des Parapodiums bieten auch nichts
Merkwirdiges.
Eteone cylindrica Orst.
1843. Q@xrsrep: Grénl. Annulata dorsibrandriata, Kgl. Danske Vidensk.
Selsk. p. 35.
Lokalitat:
Juli 8. 1901. Renbucht.
Juli 9. 1901. Renbucht.
12 HJALMAR DITLEVSEN. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
Anaitis Wahlbergi Mary.
1865. Marmeren |. ¢. A. kosteriensis p. 94.
1867. Matmeren! p. 20.
Lokalitat:
Aug. 4 Ginsefjord.
Fir die auf Spitzbergen gefundenen Individuen dieser Art giebt
Matmcren eine Linge von 70 mm,, eine Breite von 6 mm an. Er
schreibt dartiber, dass es ,rarissime ad oras maxime boreales Spetsbergice“
gefunden wird. Wrren nennt eins von der Vegaexpedition aus dem
Sibirischen Eismeere mitgebrachtes Exemplar, wie auch THEEL ein von
dem Karameere mitgebrachtes erwahnt. Die zwei letzteren Verfasser
machen keine Angaben der Grésse. Das Exemplar von dem Gansefjord
ist 90 mm. Jang und 9 mm. breit. Es ist also bedeutend grésser als
die von Spitzbergen, scheint aber im wbrigen nicht wesentlich von denen
MatmGren’s abzuweichen; doch sind die Borsten etwas verschieden:
Wiahrend deren Schaft bei der Figur Matmeren’s utberall fast gleich-
miassig dick ist, zeigt sich bei dem Individuum von dem Gansefjord an
dem oberen Ende eine sehr bedeutende Erweiterung die nach oben in
mehrere, unregelmissige Spitzen ausgezogen ist. Auch scheint das End-
blatt der Borsten verhaltnismissig linger bei dem von ,Fram“ mit-
gebrachten Individuum (Figg. 6a und 6b). Im zoologischen Museum
in Kopenhagen befindet sich ein Individuum aus dem Kattegat. Die Art
scheint somit weit verbreitet zu sein. Das Exemplar aus dem Kattegat
misst nur c. 80 mm. in der Lange.
Nepthyde.
Nepthys ciliata (MULL.).
1865. Mameren |. ¢. p. 104.
Lokalitet:
Aug. 2. 1901. Géansefjord.
Glyceride.
Glycera capitata Orsv.
1843. Orstep |. c. p. 196.
Lokalitat:
Juli 22, 1900. Winterhafen c. 60 Mt.
Aug. 3. 1900. Fosheim’s Peak und das Tal an der Westseite des Fjords
4—40 Mt.
Aug. 4. 1900. Seewalzenspitze 20—50 Mt. Steinchen.
tA. S. Macuoren: Annulata polycheta Spetsbergie, Grénlandia, Islandie et
Scandinavie hactenus congenita, Helsingforsize 1867.
1898— 1902, No. 15.] ANNULATA POLYCHAETA. 13
Lumbrinereidex.
Lumbrinereis fragilis Miu.
1867. Matmeren |. c. p. 63.
Lokalitit:
Juli 21. 1899. Winterhafen c. 16 Mt.
Juli 29. 1899. Winterhafen c. 12 Mt.
Aug. 3. 1900. Fosheim’s Peak und der Tal an der Westseite des
Fjords 4—40 Mt.
Onuphide.
Onuphis conchylega Sars.
1867. Matmeren, 1. c. p. 66.
Lokalitat:
Juli 22. 1900. Winterhafen c. 60 Mt.
Juli 25. 1900. Winterhafen.
Juli 30. 1900. Miindung des grossen Tales.
Aug. 4 1900. Seewalzenspitze 20—25 Mt. Steinchen.
Aug. 7. 1900. Ostkap 20—50 Mt.
Lycoride.
Nereis zonata MautmGRren.
1867. Maxmeren, |. c. p. 46.
Lokalitat:
Aug. 8. 1900. Winterhafen c. 20 Mt.
Septbr. 19. 1900. Vor dem Verbannungstale, 4—40 Mt.
Juli 8. 1901. Renbucht.
Juli 12. 1901. Bucht bei Landsend.
Juli 18. 1901. Miindung des Gansefjords.
Juli 19. 1902. North Devon; dem Zeltplatz gegentiber, 6—15 Mt.
Moglicherweise wird es sich zeigen, dass die zwei nahestehenden
Formen, WN. pelagica L. und N. zonata Matmeren durch Zwischen-
formen allmahlich in einander tibergehen: Hy. Tuten erwihnt (I. c. p. 42)
ein Paar geschlechtlich umgebildete, epitoke Individuen, die mit Heteronereis
assimilis und Heteronereis grandifolia Matmcren iibereinstimmen, und
die nach Matmeren epitoke Formen von JN. pelagica L. sein sollten; da
diese Art indessen an den Stellen, wovon Tuéet’s Individuen stam-
men, ganz zu fehlen scheint, nimmt er an, dass die von ihm erbeuteten
Exemplare epitoke Formen von N. zonata Mery. sind. Es sind unter
den von ,Fram“ mitgebrachten Exemplaren des Geschlechtes Nereis
keine epitoke Individuen, dagegen scheinen zwei von denen die, ich als
14 HJALMAR DITLEVSEN. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
N. zonata Mern. bestimmt habe, sich sehr der Form N. pelagica L.
za nihern. Die hellen Bander der Ringe sind sehr undeutlich und die
Parapodienlappchen sind recht stumpf und abgerundet. Die Verhaltnisse
der Paragnathen zeigen keinen wesentlichen Unterschied von den iibrigen
Individuen, sondern gerade in dieser Hinsich! stehen die zwei Arten
einander sehr nahe. Da all die tbrigen Individuen indessen der Form
NV. zonata Mern. gut genug entsprechen, und WN. pelagica L. in den
Sammlungen ,Fram“s sonst ginzlich fehlt, habe ich auch diese zwei als
N. zonata Mern. bestimmt. — Es scheint tibrigens eine Regel zu sein,
dass die hellen Querbander der Ringe bei den jiingeren Individuen stirker
hervortreten und bei den Alteren schwacher werden. Alle von ,Fram“
gesammelten Exemplare sind klein; dass grésste misst c. 75 mm. Die
gréssten von THEeL erbeuteten Exemplare sind 125 mm. in der Lange.
Hesionide.
Castalia Fabricii Merv.
1867. Matmeren, |. c. 32. C. arctica.
1878. Tuten, 1. ¢. p. 37.
Lokalitat:
Aug. 26. 1898. Rice strait.
Juli 21. 1899. Winterhafen c. 16 Mt.
Juli 29. 1899. Winterhafen c. 12 Mt.
Aug. 3. 1900. Fosheim’s Peak und das Tal an der Westseite des Fjords
4—40 Mt.
Juli 19. 1902. North Devon; vor dem Zeltplatz 6—14 Mt.
Syllidz.
Syllis Fabricii Mern.
1867, Ma.meren, I. c. p. 44.
Lokalitat:
Juli 8 1901. Renbucht.
Syllis fasciata Mern.
1867. Maxmeren, |. ¢. p. 43.
Lokalitat:
Juli 8. 1901. Renbucht.
Syilis monilicornis Merv.
1867. Matmersn, 1. c. p. 41.
Lokalitat:
Juni 28, 1901. Mundung des Walross-Fjord.
1898—1902. No. 15.] ANNULATA POLYCHAETA. 15
Spherodoride.
Ephesia gracilis Ratuxe.
Ratuxe: Beitrage z. Fauna Norwegens (Nova Acta Natur. Curios. XX. 1.)
Lokalitat:
Juli 8. 1901. Renbucht.
Spionidex.
Polydora ciliata Jounst.
1867. Matmeren, 1. c¢. p. 95.
Lokalitat:
Juli 8. 1901. Renbucht.
Crrratulidz.
Cirratalus cirratus Mutu.
1867. Matmeren, I. c. p. 95.
Lokalitat:
Juli 9. 1901. Renbucht.
Juli 12. 1901. Bucht bei-Landsend.
Aug. 30. 1901. Gansefjord, c. 8 Mt. Lehm und Steinchen.
Juli 19. 1902. North Devon; von dem Zeltplatz, 6—14 Mt.
Chetozone setosa Morn.
1867. Matmcren, |. c. p. 96.
1878. Tueet, J. c. p. 54.
Lokalitat:
Juli 22, 1899. Winterhafen. Pelagisch.
Ariciide.
Aricia armiger (MUit1.).
1867. Maxmeren, | c. p. 72.
Lokalitat:
Aug. 26. 1898. Rice strait.
Opheliide.
Ammotrypane aulogaster RaTHKE.
1867. Matmeren, |. ec. p. 73.
Lokalitat:
Juli 8. 1901. Renbucht. é
16 HJALMAR DITLEVSEN. [SEC. ARC, EXP. FRAM
Chloreemide.
Brada granulata Mery.
1867. Macmerey, |. ¢. p. 85.
Lokalitat:
Juli 22. 1900. Winterhafen.
Flabelligera affinis Sars.
1867. Marmeren, I. c. p. 83.
Lokalitat:
Septbr.20. 1900. Giéinsefjord, 4-40 Mt. Lehm und Steinchen.
Juli 9. 1901. Renbucht.
Juli 12. 1901. Bucht bei Landsend.
Aug. 2 1901. Giéinsefjord. Bis 40 Mt.
Fast alle von ,Fram“ mitgebrachten Individuen sind recht gross;
einige haben eine Lange von c. 80 mm. Diese Wiirmer leben oft massen-
haft zusammen, und man kann bisweilen, wo dies der Fall ist, tatsach-
lich das Schabeisen damit gefiillt bekommen. Ich habe etwas dergleichen
an der zool. Station ,,Kristineberg* in Schweden im Sommer 1905
gesehen. — Von den vorliegenden Individuen sind 20 demselben Ort ent-
nommen.
Trophonia plumosa Mutu.
1867. Matmeren, I. c. p. 82.
Lokalitat:
Juli 8 1901. Renbucht.
Amphicthenide.
Pectinaria hyperborea Mern.
1865. Matmersn, l. ec. p. 360.
Lokalitat:
Aug. 1. 1900. Mindung des grossen Tales.
Ampharetide.
Samytha sexcirrata Sars.
1865. Matmeren, |. c. p. 370. 7
Lokalitiat:
Aug. 2. 1901. Giinsefjord.
1898—1902. No. 15.] ANNULATA POLYCHAETA. 17
Terebellidz.
Terebellides Stromi Sars.
1865. Ma.meren, |. c. i 398.
Lokalitat: ‘
Aug. 2, 1901. Ganz hinten in dem Gansefjord. Lehm und Steinchen.
Axionice flexuosa (Gr.).
1865. Ma.meren, I. c. p. 384
Lokalitat:
Aug. 24. 1898. Rice strait.
Juli 21. 1899. Winterhafen c. 16 Mt.
Juli 9. 1901. Renbucht.
Bei dem gréssten Exemplar, dessen Tentakeln aus der Miindung
hervorragen, misst die Réhre c. 53 mm., und die Grisse ist — da die
unterste Spitze der Réhre abgebrochen, und es deshalb nicht zu unter-
scheiden ist, wie viel von dieser fehlt — wohl etwa, wie Matmcren als
Maximalgrésse angibt, 55 mm., vielleicht etwas mehr. Die tbrigen
Exemplare sind etwas kleiner.
Pista cristata (MULL).
1865. Maumersrn, |. ¢. p. 382.
Lokalitat:
Septbr. 19. 1900. Vor dem Verbannungstale, 4—40 Mt.
Scione lobata Meru.
1865. Mazmeren, |. c. p. 383.
Lokalitat:
Juli 92. 1900. Winterhafen c. 60 Mt.
Aug. 4, 1900. Seewalzenspitze, 30—50 Mt. Steinchen.
Septbr. 19. 1900. Vor dem Verbannungstale, 4—40 Mt.
Juli 5. 1901. Der Sund.
Juli 8. 1901. Renbucht.
Juli 9. 1901. Renbucht.
Juli 19. 1901. Géansefjord.
Aug. 2. 1901. Ganz hinten in dem Gansefjord, 2—4 Mt.
Dieser Wurm ist offenbar einer der am haufigsten vorkommenden
Arten in den von ,Fram“ besuchten Gegenden. Es liegen eine Menge
von Exemplaren vor, und mehrere Glaser sind mit dessen Rohrchen
gefullt. Diese bestehen, die kleineren Individuen betreffend, aus For-
aminiferen und Steinchen, die grésseren betreffend, aus etwas gro-
berem Material, mit Schlamm vermischt. Wahrscheinlich richtet sich
2
18 HJALMAR DITLEVSEN. |SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
jedoch der Bau des Rohrehens wesentlich nach der Beschaffenheit des
Bodens. Ein Individuum hat, im Gegensatz zu den dbrigen, sein
Rohrehen aus ziemlich feinem Sand gebaut, und dasselbe fast in seiner
ganzen Linge an einer Laminaria geheftet.
Thelepus circinnatus (FasR.).
1865. Maumcren, 1. c. p. 387.
Lokalitat:
Juni 29. 1901. Vor dem Zeltplatz.
Juli 8. 1901. Die Renbucht.
Juli 9. 1901. Die Renbucht.
Juli 12. 1901. Bucht bei Landsend.
Juli 19, 1902. Vor dem Zeltplatz North Devon, 6—14 Mt.
Diese Art ist ebenso wie die vorhergehende in einer Menge von
Exemplaren erbeutet, und die Réhrchen sind im hohen Grade denen der
Scione ahnlich, vielleicht aus etwas gréberem Material gebaut.
Amphitrite cirrata Mit.
1865. Matmeren, |. c. p. 375.
Lokalitat:
Juli 2. 1899. Winterhafen c. 12 Mt.
Nicolea zostericola (Orst.).
1865. Matmeren, |. ¢. p. 381.
Lokalitat:
Aug. 18. 1898. Camp Clay, Cap Sabine, 4—10 Mt.
Juli 19, 1902. Vor dem Zeltplatz, North Devon, 6—40 Mt.
Leena abranchiata Mern.
1865. Matnenen, |}. c. p. 385.
Lokalita&t:
Juli 7. 1899. Winterhafen c. 12 Mt.
Sahbellidex.
Sabella Fabricii Br.
1865. Marmeren, |. c. p. 899. Sabella Spitsbergensis.
Lokalitat-
Septbr. 19. 1900. Vor dem Verbannungstale, 4—40 Mt.
1898 — 1902. No. 15.] ANNULATA POLYCHAETA, 19
Euchone papillosa Sars.
1865, Macmeren, |, c. p. 407.
Lokalitit:
Juli 21. 1899. Winterhafen c. 12 Mt.
Ein Fragment einer Huchone, auf c. 30 Mt., im Winterhafen 8. 8. 1900
genommen, hat nicht naéher bestimmt werden kénnen.
Chone lufandibuliformis Kr.
1865. Maumeren, |. c. p. 404.
Lokalitat:
Juli 28, 1901. Die Mindung des Walrossfjords.
Juli 18. 1901. Die Mindung des Giinsefjords.
Juli 19. 1901. Der Gansefjord.
’
Dasychone infarcta (Kr).
1865. Maumeren, |. c. p. 403.
Lokalitat:
: Septbr. 20. 1900. Der Gansefjord, 4-40 Mt. Lehm und Steinchen.
Die ersten Worte, die sowohl Sars als auch Maumeren in ihrer
Geschlechtsdiagnose tiber die Dasychone brauchen, namlich: ,,Corpus
crassum“ — Kroyer hat sogar ,crassissima“ — passen nicht auf die vou
»Fram“ mitgebrachten Individuen dieses Geschlechtes. Wenn nicht be-
sonders schlank ist er doch auf der anderen Seite so langgestrecht, dass
das genannte Adjektiv gar nicht bezeichnend ist. Ein aus dem Rohr-
chen herausgenommenes Exp]. misst somit c. 115 mm. in der Lange,
wahrend die Breite nur c. 8mm. ist. Die Linge des Thieres enthilt
also die Breite 14—15 mal, waéhrend Matmcren fiir die von ibm an-
gefihrten Exemplare desselben Geschlechls, D. infarcta und D. argus
das Verhaltnis zwischen Lange und Breite wie 1 zu 4,5 angibt. Da
die vorliegenden Individuen tbrigens in allen Beziehungen typische
Dasychone sind, trage ich keine Bedenken, sie zu diesem Geschlecht
hinzufuhren.
Das Rohrchen (Fig. 7), aus sehr feinem, dunkel chokoladegefarbtem
Schlamm gebildet, ist ein Stick langer als das Tierchen. Derjenige Teil,
der nicht mit diesem ausgefillt ist, ist bei Spiritusexemplaren zusammcn-
gefallen und umgebogen; dieser ist indessen, wie auch der iibrige Teil,
nicht schlaff, sondern — wie man gewohnlich bei den Sabelliden sieht
— von einer recht festen Konsistenz, fast lederartig oder hart mem-
20 HJALMAR DITLEVSEN. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
branés, was durch den, aus der Haut des Tieres ausgeschiedenen
die Lehmpartikeln verbindenden Stoff, verursacht ist. Es scheint mir,
indessen ohne Zweifel, dass das Réhrchen in dieser Beziehung bei den
lebenden Tieren anders gewesen sein muss; es ware absurd anzu-
nehmen, dass das Tier seinem Aufenthaltsort eine solche unbrauch-
bare, zusammengeklappte, unregelmassig umgebogene Partie anbauen
wirde, in welche es kaum mit seiner ganzen Kraft seinen weichen
Kérper wirde hineinpressen kénnen; das ganze Réohrchen muss
weich gewesen sein — jedenfalls bedeutend weicher als jetzt, nach der
Konservierung — und das Tier sich auf und ab oder hin und her in
der ganzen Lange des Rohrchens haben bewegen kénnen, und die
Hartung muss somit nach dem Tode des Tieres eingetreten, und wahr-
scheinlich durch den Alkohol verursacht sein. Ein anderes Verhaltnis
zeigt auch daraufhin: Bei Tieren, die in dem Réhrchen gestorben sind,
und die sich in dasselbe hineingezogen haben, klebt dies so an dem
Kérper des Tieres, dass es ganz unmidglich ist, es von demselben zu
lésen. Wenn man das Rohrchen mit ein Paar Nadeln stiickweise weg-
prapariert, kommt das Tier zum Vorschein, mit einer hellgelben, glatten,
recht harten, firnisartigen Schicht itiberzogen, die nicht auf mechanischem
Wege wegzubringen ist; die Parapodien legen darunter, dem Korper
des Tieres dicht angepresst, die Ringteilung ist nur undeutlich zu unter-
scheiden, und nur die schwarzen Pigmentfleckchen zwischen den Para-
podien treten einigermassen scharf hervor an der Seite des Tieres. So
war das Verhiltnis bei dem Fig. 7a abgebildeten Individuum. Auf
zwei Stellen zeigt es sich deutlich, dass es sich so verhalt, namlich an
dem Hinterteil des Tieres, welcher offenbar nicht an dem Réhrchen
geklebt hat, und an einer grésseren Partie auf der einen Seite des
Tieres, wo eine Hihlung zwischen dem Kérper des Tieres und dem
Réhrchen sich vorfand. Alle 5 Individuen dieser Art sind leider in
dieser Weise in ihren Réhrehen festgeleimt, und ich habe nur eins in
der vorherbeschriebenen Weise herausgenommen. Dass dies Verhaltnis
die genaue Untersuchung des Tieres hindert, ist selbstverstindlich, und es
ware zu wiinschen, dass die Zoologen, die in der Zukumft Gelegenheit
haben werden Sabelliden einzufangen — denn dies gilt wohl den meisten
hierhergehérenden Formen — dafiir sorgen wiirden, wenigstens einige
Individuen aus den Rédhrchen zu nehmen, wahrend die Tiere noch am
Leben sind. Dass sie in solchem Falle sich nicht mit einer solchen
firnisartigen Schicht umgeben, sieht man bei Sabelliden, die frei in dem
Alkohol liegen, und die sich also jedenfalls vor dem Tode selbst aus
dem Réhrchen herausgearbeitet haben.
1898—1902. No. 15.| ANNULATA POLYCHAETA. 91
Wie wir sehen werden, zeigen ,Fram“s Exemplaren sich in keiner
nennenswerten Beziehung von der typischen Dasychone infarcta Kr,
verschieden, die aussere Form ausgenommen, und auf dieser allein kann
ich mit einiger Wahrscheinlichkeit keine neue Art griinden.
Das aus dem Rohrchen herausgenommene Individuum (Fig. 7a) ist
c. 115 mm. lang und c. 8 mm. breit; es ist leicht dorsi-ventral zusammen-
gedriickt mit elliptischem Durchschnitt; das Hinterteil des Tieres ist
dorsal aufgebogen, sodass es mit dem ubrigen Koérper des Tieres fast
einen rechten Winkel bildet. Die Kiemen, die c. 28 mm. in der Linge
messen, sind unten durch eine Haut verbunden, und ihre zusammen-
gewachsene Basis ist von jeder Seite spiralfoérmig eingerollt; man zahit
auf jeder Seite c. 40. Die einzelnen Kiemenstimme haben dunkle rot-
liche Querbainder unter den paarweise gestellten, dorsalen Anhangen;
diese sind linglich elliptisch mit schmaler Basis und stumpf abgerundeter
Spitze (Fig. 7). Die fadenférmigen Kiemenstrahlen reichen ungefahr
bis zur Spitze des Kiemenstammes (Fig. 7b). Der Halskragen hat
einen ventralen und auf jeder Seite einen lateralen Einschnitt. Auf der
Riickenseite geht er abwirts mit einem abgerundeten Lappchen auf
jeder Seite, welches so mit dem Kérper des Tieres zusammengewachsen
ist, dass die rechte und linke Seite des Kragens durch eine breite,
offene Partie getrennt werden. Die beiden Tentakeln, die auf jeder Seite
zwischen den Spiralen der Kiemenkrone versteckt liegen, sind stark
zugespitzt, messerférmig mit scharfer Schneide. Das Tier besteht aus
einer sehr grossen Anzahl von Ringen; der vorderste Teil zahlt 8 haar-
borstentragende Riickenparapodien, 7 hackenborstentragende Bauchpara-
podien, indem der erste Ring nur Riickenborsten trigt. Die Ricken-
borsten, die alle gleichartig sind, haben einseitige, gestreifte Verbramung
und weit ausgezogene feine Spitze (Figg. 7e und 7f). Die Bauch-
borsten, die vogelformig sind (Figg. 7 g und 7h), sind im Vorder- und
Hinterteil des Tieres ein wenig verschieden geformt. Zwischen den
Racken- und Bauchparapodien findet man fast in der ganzen Lange des
Tieres deutliche, schwarze Pigmentflecke. Bei starkerer Lupe-Ver-
grésserung zeigt sich jeder aus einer kleinen Gruppe schwarzer Pinkt-
chen hestehend (Fig. 7 d).
Ausser den von dem Gansefjord erwahnten Individuen, findet sich
das Vorderteil von einem, leider nur mit den fiinf ersten Parapodien;
es ist in der Renbucht genommen. An diesem kleinen Bruchstiick sieht
man indessen, dass das Tier wenigstens mit dem Vorderteile aus dem
Rohrchen herausgekrochen ist, denn die Parapodien stehen hier frei
heraus, und es ist nichts von der glanzenden, gelben, firnisartigen
22 HJALMAR DITLEVSEN. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
Schicht zu entdecken wie sonst bei den tbrigen von dem Gansefjord
stammenden Individuen. An diesem Bruchstiick von der Renbucht sind
die zwei ventralen Lippchen des Halskragens nach unten gebogen, was
nicht der Fall ist bet dem aus dem Réhrchen herausgenommenen Indi-
vid von dem Gansefjord, ein Faktum, welches zeigt, dass dies Verhaltnis
als Geschlechts- oder Artscharakter keinen Wert hat. Wahrscheinlich
kénnen die Tiere die Lappchen ganz nach Belieben umbiegen oder sie
ausbreiten; und wahrscheinlich ist es vielleicht, dass das Tier, wenn es
sich in das Rohrchen hineinzieht, sie ausbreitet. Diese Vorgang der
Ventrallippchen des Kragens ist von Wrren (I. c. p. 422) erwahnt.
Serpulide.
Spirorbis verruca Fasr.
1883, Levinsen, |. c. p. 208, Tab. H, Fig. 8h—j; Tab. HI, Fig. 2—3.
Lokalitat:
Juli 24, 1899, Einige Individuen an der Siidspitze des Pern-Island mit Hand-
Schabeisen genommen.
Spirorbis spirillum L.
1883. Levinsen, |. c. p. 211, Tab. H, Fig. 8k; Tab. IH, Fig 14—16.
Lokalitiat:
Aug. 5. 1898. Upernivik, 20-26 Mt.
Aug. 16. 1898. Foulkefjord, Reindeerpoint, 4-20 Mt.
Aug. 30. 190l. Der Géansefjord.
Juli 15. 1902. Vor dem Meerrossfelsen, North Devon. Boden steinig mit
Laminarien.
1898—1902. No. 15.] ANNULATA POLYCHAETA. 93
Erklarung der Abbildungen.
Fig. 1. Harmothoé imbricata (L.). Elytron. Zeiss a, Oc. 2.
— a. und b. Bauchborsten desselben Tieres. Zeiss C. Oc. 3.
Fig. 2. Harmothoé rarispina Sars. Teil eines Elytrons. Zeiss a, Oc. 2.
= a. und b. Bauchborsten desselben Tieres. Zeiss A. Oc. 3.
Fig. 3. Harmothoé rarispina Sars, Teil eines Elytrons. Zeiss a, Ce. 2.
— a.und b. Bauchborsten desselben Tieres. Zeiss A. Oc. 3.
Fig. 4. Zwischenform zwischen H. imbricata (L.) und H. rarispina Sars. Teil des
Elytrons. Zeiss A. Oc. 2.
a. und b. Bauchborsten desselben Tieres. Zeiss C. Oc. 3.
Fig. 5. Harmothoé imbricata L. Teil eines Elytrons. Zeiss C. Oc. 2.
Fig. 6. a. und b, Anaitis Wahlbergi Mern. Haarborsten
_ a. Zeiss C. Oc. 2.
— b. Zeiss E. Oc 2
Fig 7. Dasychone infarcta (Kr). Tier im Réhrchen eingezogen.
Tier aus dem Rohrchen herausprapariert.
Die Spitze einer Kieme. Zeiss a, Oc 2.
Mittlere Teil einer Kieme, Loupenvergr.
Einige Ringe des hintersten Teils des Tieres, die Pigmentfleckchen zeigend.
Haarborste des achten Parapodiums. Zeiss C. Oc. 2
Haarborste eines der hintersten Parapodien. Zeiss C. Oc. 2.
Hackenborste des zweiten Parapodiums. Zeiss E. Oc. 2.
Hackenborste eines der hintersten Parapodien. Zeiss E. Oc. 2.
| |
FOR me ao re
Gedruckt 19, Marz 1909.
Rep. of the 2"! Norweé.Arct.Exp.in the Fram 1898-1902.No.15.
Taf. I.
7 la Tb
ia
ier
-_
{
& , j
Sa /
Vy y ef
2 ; ?
’ ‘ > ¥ iO)
yo Pon Y )
£6
3
2a
4.
Kart-og Litoyraferingsh. Kroe.
Hjalmar Ditlevsen del.
Rep.of the gyal Norweg.Arct.Exp. in the Fram 1898
“1902.No.45.
Taf. II.
3
3b
ial Ay
ey al
| |
at Y
‘ ) re,
et
p
$ oe
{ ros
\ 1 a +
rd b,
2 val
ay
ad
ST al
4a
6b
rn,
Di
i,
ee
i
t
7
Hjalmar Ditlevsen del.
Kar}-og Litograferingeh.Kra
Rep. ot the gyi Norweg.Aret-Exp.in the Fram 1898-1902 .No.15.
Taf. Il.
She
Ze
7a
1g
v
Kart-og Litograferingsh.Kr.e
Hjalmar Ditlevsen del.
REPORT OF THE SECOND NORWEGIAN ARCTIC EXPEDITION
IN THE “FRAM” 1898—1902. No. 16.
H. G. SIMMONS:
A REVISED LIST
OF THE
FLOWERING PLANTS AND FERNS
OF
NORTH WESTERN GREENLAND
WITH SOME SHORT NOTES ABOUT THE AFFINITIES OF THE FLORA
(WITH ONE MAP IN THE TEXT)
AT THE EXPENSE OF THE FRIDTJOF NANSEN FUND
FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE
PUBLISHED BY
VIDENSKABS-SELSKABETIKRISTIANIA
(THE SOCIETY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES OF KRISTIANIA)
COC:
KRISTIANIA
PRINTED BY A. W. BROGGER
1909
Introduction.
Rou all the arctic lands, Greenland is by far the largest,
extending from Cape Farewell, in lat. 59°46’, to Cape Morris Jesup,
lat. 83° 39’, and Cape Bridgeman, in lat. 83°35’, and from Cape
Alexander, in long. W. fr. Gr. 75° 30’, to the east coast of Shannon
Island, in long. W. 17°30’. Its area may very roughly be reckoned
as 600,000 square miles. From a botanical point of view, however, only
a comparatively small part of its wide expanse is of any interest, the
whole interior being covered up by the inland ice, the widest ice sheet
of the Northern Hemisphere, which sends out numerous arms of different
size to the coast, thus separating the habitable land into many parts,
that may, however, be naturally grouped as follows:
Danish West Greenland, from Cape Farewell up to the southern
side of Melville Bay about lat. 74°. In the south, it is not sharply
defined from the coastland of the east coast, but to the north it is
separated from the land beyond Melville Bay by the many and mighty
glaciers that, except for some coast mountains and nunataks, alone
surround the interior of the bay, forming a very natural and well-
defined demarcation-line between the southern and northern coast districts
with their, in many respects, different floras and types of vegetation.
North Western Greenland, beginning at the north side of Melville
Bay in about lat. 76° and stretching up to the northernmost point,
where it merges into the east coast, may be looked upon as being
formed of two differents parts, the southern or Smith Sound region up
to about lat. 79°, and the northern, from about 80° northwards. The
boundary between them is formed by the enormous Humboldt Glacier,
forming the coast-line for nearly one degree of latitude — a barrier
which is not easily surmounted by any plant migration.
Eastern Greenland is not so easily separated into natural divisions.
A tolerably well defined line, however, may be drawn about lat. 73°30’,
1
4 H. G. SIMMONS. |SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
at Cape Hold with Hope, south of which the great fjord district begins,
stretching to the south side of Scoresby Sound (about lat. 70°) and
showing a climate and other natural conditions that make it little apt
to be drawn into comparison with North-Western Greenland. I shall
not here enter further upon the question about the possibilities of distin-
guishing phyto-geographical subdivions of this coast-land, but will only
mention that when in the following pages, I speak of North-Eastern |
Greenland, I draw the southern boundary at Cape Dalton in 69° 25’,
where the comparatively well-examined area of Scoresby Sound ends
and a coast-strech with many great glaciers begins.
Of these different parts of Greenland, the first mentioned is by far
the best surveyed in botanical as well as in other respects. The Danish
colonization, now of nearly two hundred years’ standing, has made it
more easily accessible, many of the officials of the colonies have
materially contributed to our knowledge about it, and the Danish Govern-
ment has encouraged and supported the scientific exploration of its
colonial districts in many ways, so as to make that district the best
known of all the arctic lands. The other parts of the country have
been explored only by casual expeditions, many of them even lacking
members qualified for careful and reliable scientific work; long stretches
of the coast have never been visited, at least not during the favorable
season and therefore they still form a veritable terra incognita so far
as their natural conditions are concerned.
This also is the case with North-Western Greenland, notwithstand-
ing the many expeditions that have visited at least some parts of it.
I am now going to give a sketch of the nature of this region, so far
as it may be compiled from the works of the different explorers; but
first I will give a historical summary of the expeditions which have
contributed to our present knowledge about Greenland north of Mel-
ville Bay.
The first European who sighted the land north of that wide bay
was WituiaM Barrin', who in 1616 navigated up through the great
inland sea now bearing his name. After passing Melville Bay by the
“middle passage” as the whalers have since termed it, he entered the
“North water” which led him up to Smith Sound. His northernmost
I now leave quite out of consideration the very problematic voyages of the first
scandinavian colonists of Greenland who are thought to have gone beyond
Melville Bay. Some passages in the chronicles of the Greenland colonies point
indeed to their having visited the “North water” but they certainly did not
pass Smith Sound, and their discoveries were at all events lost.
1898—1902. No. 16] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 5)
point was at lat. 77° 45’, from whence he sighted the entrance to Ingle-
field Gulf (Whale Sound) with Hakluyt Island, Smith Sound, the Carey
Islands and some points on the Greenland coast, which were named
by him, as well as Ellesmereland on the west side.
For fully two hundred years after Barrin’s voyage none, except
perhaps some dutch whalers, entered the upper part of Baffin’s Bay
and it was even erased from the maps; but in 1818 the English Govern-
ment sent out an expedition under the command of Joun Ross, who
verified the discoveries of Barrin and sailed up Smith Sound as far as
to within sight of Cape Alexander. Ross also effected the first landing
here, on Bushnan Island and, later, at Cape York and other points.
In 1849—50 the transport ship North Star, under the command of
Saunpers, wintered in North Star Bay in Wolstenholme Sound, where,
however, no exploration of any extent was undertaken.
The next visitor was E. A. INGLEeriIELD, who, in the summer of
1852, made a cruise up to Smith Sound in search of Sir Joun FRanK.in.
He landed at several places; among others he carefully examined
Wolstenholme Sound, entered Granville Bay and, following the shore,
came to a small inlet, evidently Burdin Bay, where an Eskimo village
was visited. Further, he ascertained the position of the islands at the
mouth of what we now call Inglefield Gulf and, passing Cape Alexander,
obtained a view through Smith Sound into what is now termed Kane
Basin, naming several points on both coasts. In lat. 78° 28’ he turned
back because of unfavorable ice-conditions.
Already in the following year, an american expedition came up
through Smith Sound, commanded by ExisHa Kent Kane. He was
able to round Cairn Point at the northern entrance of the Sound and,
proceeding along the coast, he took up his winter quarters in Rensselaer
Bay. From thence he examined not only the shore up to the Hum-
boldt Glacier, but also sent forward sledging expeditions. His mate
Morton and the Greenlander Hans Henprix were thus the first who
visited what Kane called Washington Land, that is to say, the Green-
land coast from the Humboldt Glacier northwards to the southern part
of the Kennedy Channel. Kane’s expedition, which lasted two years,
brougt home some rather valuable information about these regions, be-
sides mapping a long stretch of coast-line.
The next explorer was again an american, J. J. Hayes, who in
1860—61 wintered in Port koulke and examined the adjoining region
besides making journeys to the western side.
6 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Then came in 1871 Cuartes Francis Haut in the “Polaris”, who,
finding the ice conditions unusually good, sailed up to the northern ex-
tremity of the Robson Channel, where the Greenland coast begins to
trend more eastward. A long stretch of coast was made known by
this expedition, which was soon followed by the english government
expedition under the command of G. S. Nares, who, in 1875, went along
the route of the Polaris up to the northern part of Robson Channel.
Indeed, most of the explorations carried out by this expedition fell on
the west side of the channels; but it has also contributed to our know-
ledge of the Greenland coast along them as well as to the north, where
Beaumont reached lat. 82° 25’.
After the lapse of a few years, the northern parts of Greenland
were again visited by an exploring party of an expedition, which had
its principal field of work in Grinnelland. Lieutenant Locxwoop, of the
GrEELY-expedition, then made a sledge journey along the Greenland
coast, from which he was able to state that it extended to lat. 83° 35’,
a little south of which Locxwoop turned in May 1882.
Some other expeditions have contributed to the knowledge of these
parts of Greenland, or have at least visited them on the way to other
fields of work. I may mention among them the english Franklin Search
expedition under Penny in 1850; the swedish expedition in the Sofia in
1883; the ill-fated expedition of Bsérure in 1893 which, after visiting
the Carey Islands and the Greenland coast, proceeded up to Southern
Ellesmereland never to be seen again; the Fram expedition in which |
myself took part, which visited Foulke Fjord in 1898 and 1899; and the
Danish literary expedition under the late Mr. Mytius Ericusen, who has
since succumbed to the hardships of another expedition.
A wide field of work in the northern parts of Greenlands is that —
which has been covered by R. E. Peary in his different voyages be-
tween 1891 and 1906. He has also had an opportunity of stating that
Greenland does not extend as far as, or beyond, the Pole, as has for-
merly been believed, but that it ends at lat. 83° 39’. It is only to be
regretted that so indefatigable an explorer should not have shown more
interest in the different fields of scientific investigation, that could have
yielded so rich a harvest and that would have given a far greater value
to his voyages. Some important work is, however, done both by mem-
bers of his own expeditions and of the auxiliary parties which have been
sent up year after year.
Before I pass on to the special botanic information due to the
different expeditions, I will try to give a summary account of the phys-
1898—1902, No. 16.| FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 7
ical geography of the region in question. A first look at the map of
N. W. Greenland shows that most parts of it are typical fjord-lands.
There are exceptions to this in the shore of Melville Bay, and along the
Kane Basin and Kennedy Channel, all of which are less indented. Most
parts of the coast are high and bold, either forming a tableland falling
abruptly down to the shore, or broken up by deep valleys. Many favo-
rable localities for the development of a thriving vegetation are thus
formed; and in many places the richness of bird-life also helps to make
the soil favorable for plant-life. The rich green of the manured soil in
and below the rookeries of auks and other sea-birds, makes them dis-
cernible from afar. Doubtless, therefore, the arms of the larger fjords
also, — especially Inglefield Gulf — where the climate is less severe than
along the outer coast, where the cliffs form breedingplaces for in-
numerable birds, and where valleys of considerable extent trend
inland are by far the richest in number of species as well as in density
of vegetation, whereas the open coast is comparatively poor. Along the
shore of Melville Bay, where every valley is filled by a glacier, there is
of course space for very little vegetation. Further northwards come the
richest districts, Wolstenholme Sound, Inglefield Gulf and Foulke Fjord
with their adjacent ice-free land. Now, indeed, this ice-free coast land
is continued by a fairly broad stretch along the Kane Basin to the
Humboldt Glacier; and to the north there occurs a still broader expanse
of ice-free land, but very few plants are known from these parts. How-
ever, | am inclined to think that, for instance, the slopes and table-lands
along the Kennedy Channel might be apt to contain a rather well-deve-
loped vegetation. It must, however, be borne in mind, that these regi-
ons are far less accurately investigated than the southern coast parts.
Only one of the expeditions which have been there has had a member
specially acting as botanist; and, apart from the wintering of the Polaris
at Thank God Harbour, only casual visits have been made to the north-
ern parts of the North-Western Greenland coast, mostly during the un-
favorable season. ~
Another point always to be borne in mind is the diversity of the
geological nature of the different parts of the coast-line. About this
there is, however, very little known, as most expeditions have had no
members able either to recognize the rocks belonging to different geolog-
ical systems, or to determine fossils; and, in most cases, no collections
seem to have been made. Yet some indications are to be found,
especially in De Rance and Fempen, Appendix 15, Geology, in Nares,
Narrative. Naruorst, N. W. Gronl., also mentions that at Ivsugigsok the
8 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP.FRAM
rocks were formed of gneiss and micaslate with veins of quarts which,
according to him, forms generally in arctic lands a poor soil for the
development of vegetation. Indeed, my own experience from Ellesmere-
land is quite different; the regions with an underground of primary rock
there being by far the richest in density of vegetation and number of
species. Now this seems principally due to the stability of the rock,
which, as being less easily attacked by the frost, gives a less changing
surface; the débris of other strata may form a richer soil if it is only
preserved long enough to be come clad with vegetation. A soil formed
of débris, for instance of Silurian limestone, but resting on Archaean
rock, is probably the most favorable; and the richness of the Foulke
Fjord flora mentioned in the following, may perhaps be partly due to
such a combination in the geological nature of the place.
From Cape York the Archaean rocks may be followed northwards
at least to Littleton Island, forming the basement of the mountains along
the outer coast and also the upper parts of some of them. According
to De Rance and Fempen, lower Silurian (Cambrian?) strata of grit and
conglomerate appear between Wolstenholme and Whale Sounds, and in
Foulke Fjord there rest upon a basement of gneiss, thick layers of Ter-
tiary, probably Miocene, sandstone and conglomerate overlaid by basalt.
As far as could be judged from a distance, the architecture of Cape
Alexander is the same as in Foulke Fjord, and probably the same geo-
logical structure continues further north as far as to the great gap in the
coast filled by the Humboldt Glacier. North of the great glacier appear
Silurian strata, mostly limestone, through Washington Land to Peter-
mann Fjord, and from Hall Land northwards the coast, according to the
last-mentioned authors, is built up of older, azoic rocks (Algonkian ?).
The loose deposits, resting on the rock basement, are principally of
three kinds: — either débris fallen from the cliffs, or washed down dur-
ing the melting of the snow, or formed under the surface of the sea
and afterwards raised to their present position. This upheaval of the
land has evidently taken place at a rather late period, as may be seen
from the well-preserved organic remains found at various heights above
the present shore-line. Indeed the observations concerning these pheno-
mena, are mostly made on the other side of the Channels, but the same
feature is also prevalent in North-Western Greenland. Raised beaches
and deposits containing marine shells and other remains proving their
origin on the sea bottom, play a very important part in the formation
of the loose soil of these regions,
1898—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 7)
So far as can be gathered from the literature at present available,
there are hardly any deposits of an extent worth noting, that are due
to glacial action in former times. Indeed, there are very few indications
from which an opinion may be formed, especially concerning the north-
ern parts of our area; but I think I may be allowed to conclude from
them, that the same holds true for this region as Scuer says in his
Prel. Rep. Geol., p. 9, about Ellesmereland: “there are no materials lying
on those parts of the country that are not now glaciated that could, with
any probability, be considered to result from the action of glaciers.”
Indeed, the map showing the extent of glaciation in America, which
accompanies chapter XLI in Grrxre, The Great Ice Age, Ed. 3, gives the
north-western part of the land a complete covering of ice. I am at a
loss to understand why the author of that chapter, Professor T. C. CHam-
BERLIN, has presumed that the inland ice has reached so far, the more
so as he has not drawn the entire Arctic Archipelago ice-covered, as it
is in older maps. It would, of course, be of no small interest to know
if such an ice sheet ever existed, as then every species of the present
flora must have immigrated in post-glacial time. I am most inclined
to think, indeed, that hardly any higher plants have lived there during
the maximum of glaciation, but still I look upon the existence of ice-
free land as probable, even if perhaps much larger glaciers have pro-
truded into the fjords. The geological map of Dawson gives no enlight-
enment about the existence of glacial deposits, and no geological explor-
ation has been made north of Smith Sound since the time of the Nares
expedition.
About the present extension of the ice-sheet also, there are different
statements. The new danish map shows in several points the ice-border
further west than, for instance, it is shown in the english Admiralty
Chart and the maps from which that is compiled. In all probability, how-
ever, the ice-free land in most parts of N. W. Greenland is rather broad,
and consequently affords room for the development of vegetation inland
also. As to the approximate extent of the ice-free, habitable land, it is,
of course, impossible to form an opinion at present.
Another factor of great importance is to be found in the climate
of the region and especially in the amount of yearly precipitation. Con-
cerning this, however, there is but little to be found in the existing
literature. The results obtained in the adjacent Ellesmereland by the
expeditions of Nares, GreeLy and ourselves may, however, together
with what is to be found in the publications about the voyages of Kane,
Haves and Hatt, enable us to form the conclusion that the amount of
10 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
precipitation is very small indeed, probably not much above 100 mm.
in most parts, perhaps somewhat greater in the southern part, where
the open “north water’ is always to be found some miles from the
coast, perhaps also locally here and there along the Kennedy and Rob-
son Channels. The same circumstances consequently prevail here as
throughout the Arctic Islands. I shall not enter here upon the influence
of temperature and snow covering.
Historical Review of the Botanical Explorations.
After this short sketch of the physical geography of the region in
question, I have to discuss, in some detail, the material for the know-
ledge of the flora of North-Western Greenland, contained in the jour-
nals and other publications from the above-mentioned expeditions. I very
much regret not to have had the collections of the different american
expeditions for inspection. That those who have determined the plants
have made mistakes on many points cannot be doubted, and in several
cases, most probably, the collections from different localities, or even
from far avay districts in Greenland, have been confounded, either by
the collectors themselves or afterwards, thus causing a confusion which
makes it hardly possible to use the statements at all; for instance, about
the botanical harvest of Kane and Hayes. The collections of the eng-
lish expeditions I have had an opportunity of revising at the Natural
History Museum of London and at the Herbarium of the Royal Gar-
dens, Kew, but still here there is much evidence lacking also, as the
localities are, in many cases, not mentioned in the labels; it is also
impossible to see under what different species the specimen may have
originally been placed. In some cases, not a single specimen bears out
the statements for instance of Hart or Ontver.
The first record of plants from our area, is to be found in the jour-
nal of Joun Ross’s voyage in 1818. The list of plants in his work is
unfortunately of very little value, as not only are no special localities
mentioned, but even the plants, collected in Danish and N. W. Green-
land as well as in Possession Bay in Baffins Land, are not kept sepa-
rate. A few notes, however, are found in the running text of Ross’s
journal, and of these I have tried to make use, as far as possible, in
the following treatment of each species,
The next explorer who collected plants in N. W. Greenland was
Dr. Perer C. SurHertanp who, as a member of the Franklin Search
189S—1902. No.16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 11
expedition under the commando of Penny, visited, on August 10, 1850,
Bushnan Island where Ross had also landed. SuTHertanp, who was
a trained botanist, has given a list of the plants collected during the
expedition, with localities mentioned for every species, most of which are,
however, only collected to the west.
SUTHERLAND again visited N. W. Greenland in 1852 as surgeon of
the search-expedition under INGLEFieLp, where he probably took a large
part in bringing together the collection of plants named in the “Notes of
Flowering Plants and Algae” which forms one of the Appendices to Incue-
FIELD's Summer Search. Some plants were, however, collected by the com-
mander and other members of the expedition. Collections were made
at Wolstenholme Sound and Whale Sound. Detailed information about
the points in the first-mentioned inlet, where plants were collected, is
wanting; but from some details and a small list of plants contained in
the journal, it may be concluded where this collection was made (I. c.,
p. 99—62): “After running twenty-one miles from Cape Parry along the
shore, huts were observed in a bight that proved to be a small deep water
bay”. The place so designed can only be Burdin Bay, and, as no other
landing in Inglefield Gulf is mentioned, I think the Whale Sound plants
were all collected at Burdin Bay.
Dr. E. K. Kane, who spent two years (1853—55) in N. W. Green-
land, has made a good many notes about the flora and vegetation of
the different points visited during the expedition, and a fairly extensive
collection was brought home too, which had been gathered by himself
and others, for instance the Danish interpreter Petersen. Kane had
also made collections and notes when, in 1850, he visited the neighbour-
hood of Cape York in the first Grinett-expedition under De Haven.
His collections were given to Mr. Ertas Duranp who used them for his
memoir “Plantae Kaneanae Groenlandicae”. It is, however, to be re-
gretted that Kane was not more of a trained botanist, for he had an
opportunity of examining parts of the coast never visited by any other
explorer; and he had doubtless as well, a keen eye for detecting even
the more insignificant species, and a greater interest in botany than most
of the travellers in these regions. Now, many of his notes are deci-
dedled based upon wrong identifications. Another unfortunate circum-
stance is, that his collections, made partly in Danish Greenland, partly
to the north, have doubtless in some cases been confounded during the
difficult and hazardous retreat of the expedition after the abandonment
of the ‘Advance’. Much had to be left behind; and even if, through
Kane’s indefatigable exertions, as much was carried along in the boats
12 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
as could be taken besides the indispensable outfit, I think the fact that
many specimens came into the hands of the editor without references
to the special locality, must be accounted for by the circumstances of
the retreat.
That Duranp, who was entrusted with the treatment of these valu-
able collections, was by no means able to do it in a satisfactory man-
ner is clearly shown, both by the many evidently wrong identifications
in his paper — which have since caused many wrong statements to be
made about the distribution and range of different plants, and false
conclusions to be based upon them by later authors — and also by the
curious theoretical speculations which he has inserted in the introduc-
tion to his list. I have tried to make as much use as possible of his
indications about the occurrence of the different plants, as also of the
remarks to be found in Kane’s own journal; but in many cases I have
been obliged to take refuge in more conjecture based upon my know-
ledge about the plants that may be really meant, or the occurrence of
which is probable. Where that has not been possible, for instance where
the record may equally well be referred to one species as to another,
I have preferred to leave it quite out of consideration. Kane's collec-
tions and notes also form the first contribution of the botany of the
region north of the Humboldt Glacier.
The collections brought home by Hayes from his expedition in
1860—61, were also treated by Duranp. His list of the plants, collec-
ted for the greater part in Port Foulke, but some also in other points
of the N. W. Greenland coast or in Ellesmereland, has already been
criticized by other authors, especially MatmGren (Grinnell. FI.) and Nar-
Horst (N. W. Grénl.). Besides the evidently wrong statements based
upon mistakes in identification of species, there are also other more or
less doubtfull points about the Enum. pl. Smith S., especially, that the
dates and localities given there, disagree in several points with the jour:
nal of Hayes. According to Duranp, all the plants were collected in
1861, none during the autumn of 1860, and at the following places in
the following order:
July (15th specially mentioned) and August : Port Foulke
— 12th — Ath: Netlik
— 27th and 29th: Gale Point (Ellesmereland)
— 28th : Cape Isabella —
Sept. 4th : Tessiussak.
1898— 1902. No.16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..W.GREENLAND. 18
According to Haves’s own Journal and his address to the American
Philosophical Society of Philadelphia, Dec. 6, 1861, the expedition visited
the following places enumerated in chronological order:
Proven . . . . . Danish Greenland Aug. 6—12, 1860
Upernivik. . 2... — — » 12-16 ,
Tasiusak (Tessiussak) — — ,» 21-92 ,
Cape York . . . . N.W. — 5 20 3
Cape Alexander . .) — ~- » 30 a
Littleton Island 2. — _ Sept. 3 .
Port Foulke. 2. 2. 2.0 — — 4
”
After wintering there, the following points were visited the next
year (besides those only reached in sledging expeditions during the
winter time):
Port Foulke. . . . . . . N. W. Grenland until July 14 1861
Littleton Island . . . . . — — . 5—7 ,
— — Sy lew its dibs 2 = — » 14? ,
Cairn Point. . . 2... ace — - ? ‘i
Cape Isabella . . . . . . Ellesmereland rs -
Gale Point. . . . ..., — ? Fe
Hakluyt Island . . . . . N.W. Greenland 2 .
Burdin Bay (Netlik) ©. . . — — ? (several days, not July 12)
Itiplik (Ittiblu?) 2. 2. 2. 2. 2 00 = — ?
Upernivik . . . . . . . Danish — Aug. 14—? 1861
Augpalartok (Aukpadlartok) . = — ‘ ? ‘4
Godhavn. ...... — — Sept. 1 e
At the beginning of September, the expedition was already far to
the south, and consequently no plants could then be collected in N. W.
Greenland. There must, therefore, be something wrong about the indi-
cation “‘Tessiussak, Sept. 4th” but it is probably not the date only.
Duranp says: Dr. Hayes’s collections have been confined to the limits
of the 78th and 82nd parallels (Enum. pl. Smith S., p. 93), but no col-
lections are made north of lat. 79° and Hayes (Op. Pol. Sea, p. 55)
speaks explicitly of his “Proven and Upernivik collections”, which al-
ready contained all the plants he saw at ‘“‘Tessiussak”, when he went
botanizing there (Aug. 1860, see above). Those collections from the more
southerly parts of Greenland have, in all probability, formed part of the
material which Duranp has treated as having been collected only north
of Melville Bay, and thus an explanation may be found for the fact,
14 H. G. SIMMONS. |SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
hat he has recorded some species not previously known from these
‘egions. Such are to be found especially among the plants from “Tes-
siussak” which I have also quite excluded from my lists of occurrence;
wo species of Durann’s list thus disappear entirely, viz. Campanula
rotundifolia and Lycopodium annotinum. From Netlik (which was not
visited July 12th), there are some doubtful statements also, especially
Alchemilla vulgaris, which I[ have, however, entered with hesitation.
Some of the Netlik and Port Foulke plants have indeed never been
ound again there by other collectors, but, as they are found in adja-
‘ent regions, they may still grow there. Such are “Armeria vulgaris”
Statice maritima), Betula nana, and Tofieldia palustris.
Cases in which I have not excluded a species doubtless wrongly
letermined, but have only altered the name as I have thought right,
nay be seen in the following, from the special synonymics under each
species.
Still there would be a certain interest in knowing where the plants
rom “Tessiussak, Sept. 4”, are really collected. Now the newer maps
f the region, the English Admiralty Chart of 1896, as well, as the new
xreenland map published by Commissionen for Ledelsen av de geolo-
ogiske og geographiske Undersogelser 1 Gronland, 1906, know no such
lace in the region north of Melville Bay; but in the map accompa-
rying Hayes, Arct. boat journ., there is a place so named at the north
ide of Wolstenholme Sound or in Granville Bay (the map is very
naccurate). This place might have been visited during the journey north-
vard in 1860, even if no visit there is mentioned by Hayes, but cer- —
ainly not in 1861. At all events, such plants as the above-mentioned
lo not appear there. It is more probable indeed, that the species in
juestion and some more, may have been collected at the Danish out-
vost (Udliggersted) of Tasiusak in lat. 73° 21', when Hayes visited it
n 1860.
Opposed to this supposition, on the other hand, is the fact mentio-
ved by Durann, |. c., p. 93, that some plants, among them Lycopodium
tnnotinum, only recorded from the dubious “‘Tessiussak”, were brought
1ome in a living state. ‘These cannot have been taken so early as the
irst year. Most probably they were collected at some of the last points
hat were visited — Upernivik, with its environs, and Godhavn. Ma.m-
‘REN, |. c., p. 174, thinks the latter place the most likely to be the one,
rom which Hayes tried to bring home a living collection of arctic
ants, and I can only agree with him. The name “Netlik” also is ab-
ent from the new maps; but in the same place where it occurs in the
1898-1902. No.16.] FLOW.PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W- GREENLAND. 15
map of Hayes (Arct. boat journ.), there lies an Eskimo village named
Natsilik, which is doubtless the same place. Hayes may have mis-
understood the name, or it may have been altered since, which is often
the case with Eskimo names.
Another discrepancy, which ought to be mentioned, exists between
Duranp’s list and that of Hayes himself (Op. Pol. Sea, p. 398—99),
where some corrections are made; these are, however, of different value,
being only partly based upon more reliable determination.
During the next american expedition, that of Hatt, 1871, evidently
very little was done towards the botanical exploration of the new land
visited. BrsseLs, however, the leader of the expedition after the death
of Hatt, has given a list of twenty-one or twenty-two species found in
Hatt land, probably in the vicinity of Polaris Bay (Amer. Nordpol
Exp., p. 304). One species is here added to the preliminary list of Bessets
(Exp. Pol. Amer., p. 297) and the identifications of the species are said
to have been verified by Asa Gray. Notwithstanding, I think that some
of the records must be based on a mistake; such, for instance, as Erio-
phorum vaginatum and most probably also Carew dioica. This list
is, however, still of considerable interest as being the first contribution
to the flora of the northern parts, with the exception of the few plants
mentioned by Kans from Morton’s spring journey along Kennedy Channel.
The Nares expedition in 1875—76 visited Cape York and Foulke
Fjord in the southern part of our area, and, to the north, the region at
the mouth of Bessels Bay as well as at Polaris Bay; and besides that,
one single note is given about the vegetation at Braumont’s farthest.
As the expedition had scientific investigations for its purpose more di-
rectly than the previous ones, and as it also possessed a member spe-
cially acting as its botanist, its botanical harvest was far greater than
that of its predecessors. Mr. H. C. Hart, the botanist of the expedition, and
several other members—Captain, now Colonel H. W. Fempen, Doctors
Moss and Coprincer, besides others, brought together a rather extensive
collection which is still of great value for the study of the flora. It is,
however, to be regretted as I have already set forth in my Fl. Ellesm.,
that, in many cases, the specimens are labelled with insufficient care.
In some cases also, it seems quite certain that specimens from the places
in Danish Greenland visited by the expedition have got mixed with the
N. W. Greenland and Ellesmereland collections, thus causing some wrong
statements. In other cases, not a single specimen in the London her-
barium confirms a statement that ought surely to be thus supported
16 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
if doubts are not to arise in the mind of one who has had opportunities
of forming a tolerably well-based opinion about the flora of those regions.
The first list of the plants collected during the expedition, is given in
Nares, Narrative, where Oxrver has enumerated the flowering plants
from Ellesmereland, and J. D. Hooker has given some notes about the
relations and peculiarities of the flora, to which I shall have to come
back later on. Afterwards Hart himself gave a detailed record of the
flora, with accounts about the distribution of each separate species
(Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.). He also gives some notes about the vegetation of
the places visited, beginning with some Danish Greenland ports and
further on Cape York and Foulke Fjord which latter is represented as
“this most interesting of all our havens”. I can fully agree with him
in this view, as also in his conjecture that more remains to be found
there, notwithstanding the Foulke Fjord list has now, after my two short
excursions at the place, become by far the largest of any N. W. Green-
land district of the same extent.
Further to the north Hart visited Hannah Island and Bessels Bay.
Among the plants from the latter locality he especially mentions Poa
alpina, whichis, however, doubtless due to a wrong identification of a form of
P. cenisia, as no specimen of the former exists in the London collec-
tions. Polaris Bay was visited by Hart in May, when only few plants
were discernible, and by Coppinger in July and August. This station
is said to be rather poor in plant-life (for instance only two Sasxifragae
and no Cyperaceae), and Harr is inclined to attribute this to the cir-
cumstance that the climate is severer there than on the west side of the
Channel. That may be so, but 1 am more inclined to think that it is
caused by the geological nature ‘of the soil, the hard limestone forming
a very poor ground. The entire list of Polaris Bay contains only
twenty-two species, or in fact only nineteen. when those are exluded
which are either wrongly determined, or cannot be upheld as separate
(Papaver alpinum, Draba rupestris, Dryas octopetala). I am hardly
inclined to think that this list is complete if it is to hold good for a
wider range; but I have indeed seen small districts much further south
in the limestone region of Ellesmereland having an equally poor vege-
tation.
The GreeLy expedilion did not contribute much to our knowledge of
the Greenland flora, as its principal field of work fell to the west; still
we are indebted to Lockwoop and Brarnarp for some plants from the
northern-most points in the world where collections have been made
(what the collections from the latest Danish East Greenland expedition
1898 —1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..W.GREENLAND. 17
contain I do not yet know, but plants from an even still higher latitude
may exist among them). Only a few plants could, however, be discerned
at Lockwood Island in May. —
How much may be done, even in a short excursion, by a trained
botanist, especially one who is well aquainted beforehand with arctic
plants, is shown by the visit of Natsorst to Ivsugigsok near Cape York,
where he went with the “Sofia” in 1883, while-his commander, Norpen-
SKIOLD, was on his inland ice trip from the Aulaitsivik Fjord in Danish
Greenland. Notwithstanding that it is an open coast locality, he was
able, after an excursion of only a few hours’ duration, to make up a
list of fifty-eight species. In comparison it may be mentioned, that the
whole list for the wide district of Inglefield Gulf, contains only seventy-
three species; and that none of the different collectors has there obtained
a greater number than 46. It may, however, be taken for granted, that
the flora at Inglefield Gulf, must be richer than in any other part of
N. W. Greenland, and will yield, in the most favorable spots, even more
than the Foulke Fjord list (see p. 20).
Two lists of plants, collected during expeditions sent as relief parties
to Peary during his work in N. W. Greenland, have been published.
The first of these is based upon specimens collected in 1891 by Dr.
Burk at Cape York and in M’Cormick Bay, Inglefield Gulf, and in 1892
by Mr. Meewan who has treated these collections in a paper in the
Proceed. Acad. Nat. Sc. of Philadelphia, 1893 (Contr. Greenl.). MerHan
enumerates a good many localities where he has botanized, but from
several of them not a single plant is mentioned in his accounts of dis-
tribution which, moreover, are very imperfect. Another weak point of
Meguan’s paper is, that he has been entirely unable to identify his
plants as is shown by Horm, who has given a long list of corrections
(Contr. Fl. Greenl.). Mr. Hotm has, however, only had opportunities of
controlling the determination of some of the plants, represented in the
National Herbarium of Washington; and several more of Mernan’s
statements seem to be in a great need of corroboration or correction.
Another list of plants collected in the Peary auxiliary expedition
of 1894 by Dr. WerHerILL is made up at Harvard University. The
names of those who are answerable for the determinations, seem to imply
that they are reliable, in general at least; and, as the collections seem
to have been made with care and without any intermixture of plants
from different localities, this list is of great value and interest, the more
so as it contains rather a large number of additions to the flora of our
area. The flora of Cape York especially is enriched with several in-
2
18 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT, EXP. FRAM
teresting species, whose occurrence here seems to point to an im-
migration over Melville Bay from Danish Greenland, as they are found
neither to the north, nor in Ellesmereland. WerHerttL also seems to be
the only botanist, who has made collections in the Carey Islands (Bjor-
ling Island).
In 1899—1901, the american geologist R. Stem made some collect-
ions of plants on the west side of Smith Sound as well as at Cape
York, Inglefield Gulf and Foulke Fjord. The specimens have been deter-
mined by Mr. Hot of Brookland D. C., who has kindly sent me a list
for publication. Part of it I have already used in my FI. Ellesm., the
rest is used here. In some instances, I have employed other names
than those in Mr. Hotm’s list, and, in one single case (Salix arctica
for S. glauca and S. groenlandica), I have felt obliged to differ from
his opinion. I am sorry not to have consulted further with him on this
point, but I hope that he will excuse me, as I have not had time to do
so at present.
In 1908, the late Mr. L. Myttus Ericusen made a small collection
at Granville Bay, and, in 1905, the Rev. Knup Bate brought home a
somewhat larger collection from Wolstenholme Sound. Both collections
are determined by Dr. C. H. Ostenre.p of Copenhagen (Fl. pl. Cape
York).
Lastly, I must mention my own material from Foulke Fjord, con-
taining 130 numbers of flowering plants and ferns, and representing 76
species. The whole collection was made during our two short visits to
Foulke Fjord, in the course of three excursions which together were
of hardly 30 hours’ duration. The lower land between Reindeer Point
and Etah was, on both occasions, my field of excursion, that is to say,
I had only an opportunity of walking over a strip of ground about half
a mile in breath and four miles in length. It is much to be regretted,
that I could not reach the interior part of the fjord nor the higher slopes
and plateaus inland; as I cannot but think that they would have yielded
important additions to my list — especially in the matter of bog- and
water-plants, which are almost entirely lacking in my collection. I could
also have wished very much for a trip over to Port Foulke, where I
should perhaps have been able to verify some of the doubtful statements
from Hayes’s time. The leader of the expedition, however, was too anx-
ious to shorten our stay in Foulke Fjord, to allow time for a closer
exploration which might have given valuable results. It was impossible
even to obtain a landing at Cape Alexander, which was very desirable,
and could easily have been effected, as we steamed past it so close as
1898-1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W.GREENLAND. 19
to have the rich, green slopes in full view; but it was deemed more
profitable to spend the time in walrus-hunting.
The table below, which I have compiled in order to show the grad-
ual widening of our knowledge about the flora of the region, I have
thought to be of some interest; the more so, as it also gives some hints
concerning the results to be expected from future exploration and about
the different degrees of accuracy in the observations of different travellers.
It must, however, be kept in mind, that some places are visited only
during times when very little can be found; such, for instance, are Gran-
ville and Lafayette Bays, and Lockwood Island; but, on the other hand
also many places have certainly been very imperfectly explored. Judging
from the brilliant verdure of the slopes of Cape Alexander, I cannot
doubt that I should have been more than repaid, for a few hours’ visit
there, by a list of at least 30—40 species, and a corresponding collection.
The table does not give the numbers of species for each locality in
such a way as they are to be taken directly from the different lists, but
I have tried to make use of as many statements as possible, and have
entered all records that are tolerably reliable, and not too vague as to
the locality. If the somewhat indistinct statements of the older authors
had been used in a larger degree, of course the numbers, for instance,
for Ross, Kane, etc. would have been larger at the expense of the later
collectors, who have given exact records about their specimens. Such
indications as ,,Smith Sound stations“, ,Inglefield Gulf‘, etc., are of
course left out of consideration here, even if sometimes I have mentioned
them in the following statements about the occurrence of each separate
species.
If the 14 species, admitted in the special treatment as doubtful, are
added to the number in the table, we get a total of 122 species. When
Nartuorst (N. W. Grénl.) treated the flora in 1884, he gave a list of 88
species to which, in his Nachtr., 4 more are added. Notwithstanding
the fact that I have excluded 19 (besides some for which I use other
names), the flora now reckons 16 species more or, in other words, 35
species have been added since then. Some of these, however, had al-
ready been found before Natuorst wrote his compilation, but they were
either wrongly determined, or were excluded by him as too doubtful to
insert in the list. Thus the new species are, in fact, only 29, found by
Meenan, WETHERILL, STEIN, and myself.
As I shall have to use the numbers of species for the whole area
and its different parts in the following discussion about the affinity of
the flora, I am sorry that I have not been able to make sure, at least
20 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC, ARCT, EXP. FRAM
Table I.
e|_ls| [a8
2 ZiBl les altiziel ee
Saeiledpeagilll [es
olEls Berets Hic Brelsie s
©|8)s 8/71, S/S) a) FE] /2 a |Si 5 =
TES] SSlclE| SiS i2l ei clBlele s
0 2/8/0)2) Flo) elo /S|5/ 8) 6).2) cox
S/5/m 512/83) 8/8 slSie Elselsis g
0 Ah |S ee (a a Je eran pe ied
Bushnan Island 3, 9 | 10
Cape York Sere) Rk ae ee 12 97) 11 39
Ivsugigsok . . eewhs Urcee Ah yee 58 58
Wolstenholme Soni ee eee j 84
Saunders Island se: a he Wee og i
Umanak ye seriay oo bce 5 13 23)
Granville Bay . . . . 1... eee 6 6
Carey Islands . ........-. | 5 5
Inglefield Gulf. . . . ao he aebsiay o | 23
Northumberland elon ie Aphis an ok 3 5] 1388 389
Burdin Bay (Netiulumi, Netlik). . . {1} 15 10 4 29
Bowdoin Bay ......... 10 10
Cape Acland. . ........ 4 94
Fan Glacier . . ........ 99 92
Verhoef Nunatak . . . 1... . 7 7
M’Cormick Bay. . . ‘ 11 11
Cape Alexander & Sathesland Teland 9) 9 4
Foulke Fjord ‘ 4 G6 1/18) 34 1| |76/23 81
Fog Inlet & Bedevilled ‘Headly he ad nas {6 16
Rensselaer Bay . ........ 93 93
Mary Minturn River 8 8
Lafayette Bay . ; 4 8 8
Bessels Bay & Hanna, Ilana. woe 8 12 12
Polaris.Bay'. 4 6 & & 2 uw wow w 21/18 v3)
Lockwood Island... ...... 4 4
Total number of species . . 3) 9/21/37/33/21/49| 4/58/19169/76/45! 6/23
Additions to the N. W. Greenland flova 3} 7/12)26] 7 2) 9/18) 2]17) 9) 1)—|—]]t08
of the value of all the existing indications; especially as there is another
weak point always to be calculated with, viz., the imperfect exploration
of most parts. In the hope of inducing some competent botanist to make
a revision of the american collections, which may supply some future
worker on the N. W. Greenland flora with material less studded with “?”,
I will point out where those collections seem to be kept.
The specimens of Kans, Hayzs, Bessers, Burk and MEEHAN are
probably all included in the collections of the Academy of Natural Sci-
ences of Philadelphia; at least it is especially mentioned, that some of
them belong to that herbarium. The collections of WeETHERILL were
determined at Harvard University, which probably possesses them. As
to where the “private collection” of GREELY is kept, I am entirely ignor-
1898—1902, No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..W.GREENLAND. 21
ant. A thorough revision—especially of the Kane and Hayes plants—
would be of the greatest value; not only for an exact knowledge of the
N. W. Greenland flora, but also for the settling of several questions
concerning the flora of Danish Greenland, for which a considerable
number of plants is recorded by Duranp alone, most probably because
he has arrived at wrong determinations.
A striking feature in the above table, is the very different number
of species for the stations explored. The small area of Foulke Fjord has
yielded 81 plants—a number greater than that from any other single
locality ; and even the list arrived at in my short stay there, is larger
than that of the entire area of the widely-branching district of Inglefield
Gulf, which, running far inland into a country of similar geological
nature, doubtless affords still better conditions than those of Foulke
Fjord. During my short stay at the iatter place, I found again all the
species previously recorded for it with the exception only of 5 (among
which 2 at least are somewhat doubtful), and I added a considerable
number, including 9 species new to the whole of N. W. Greenland.
I think that several more species might still be found, were a trained
botanist to get an opportunity of surveying more than the small patch
of ground which I was able to reach to investigate.
Next to Foulke Fjord stands Ivsugigsok with a list of 58 species.
A few indeed have been excluded from the list of Natnorst (Dryas
octopetala, Luzula spicata, Glyceria angustata, Taraxacum officinale)
but they have been replaced by others through the revision of his mate-
rial so as to give the original numbers unaltered. It is due principally
to the keen eye of Narxorst, trained in the excellent school of former
swedish arctic expeditions, but partly also to WeTHERILL, that the Cape
York region now shows a list of 75 species. Its relatively close neigh-
bourhood to Danish Greenland may, to a certain degree, have facilitated
an immigration and perhaps affords an explanation of this abundance;
but I think most of those plants will be found further north also, and
will not be confined to the open coast localities of Cape York.
That the figures for Wolstenholme Sound, 34, far from represent
the true number of its flora can hardly be doubted, especially as many
common species are absent from it. Here much is left for future explo-
ration. In Inglefield Gulf, one locality only—Northumberland Island—
has reached as yet a number of 39 species. Of these Srein’s list con-
tains 38. None of the branch fjords, each equalling Foulke Fjord in
size and probably surpassing it in conditions of plant-life, has as yet
yielded as much as 30 species; and the total number of recorded plants
99 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
is not more than 73. As some of these are rare species, not found in
other N. W. Greenland places, it appears that a great many common spe-
cies must have been entirely overlooked here.
From the Carey Islands 5 plants only are noted (Potentilla Vahliana,
Saxifraga oppositifolia, Cerastiwm alpinum, Salix arctica, Catabrosa
algida). In all probability, some more may be found there; but judging
from my own experience in some small islets in Jones Sound, about which
I shall elsewhere give an account, I am inclined to think that the number
of species which have found their way to these small isolated islands,
surrounded for the greater part of the year by open water, may be very
small. Among species which I think are most likely to be found there,
I may mention Cochlaria officinalis and Glyceria distans, growing
generally around the gulls’ nests in the rookeries. It is, however, to be
regretted that WeTHERILL, who alone has contributed to the botanical
knowledge about these islands, has not published any notes about their
vegetation.
The numbers of species for the localities of Kane are small enough
indeed, even Rensselaer Harbor only reaching 23. This may be due
partly to the loss of some parts of the collections, partly perhaps to the
hard climate of the nearly always ice-bound shore of Kane Basin. The
existence of such species as Lesquerella arctica, Hesperis Pallasii,
Ranunculus Sabinei, Pedicularis arctica, some of which are only
found here, rather induces one to think that the broad stretch of ice-free
land here may have allowed the development of a flora, which will at
some future time yield many more species.
Concerning the whole region north of the Humboldt Glacier, there
is hardly anything more to be said, than that it is far too imperfectly
explored as yet for any inferences to be drawn about the real bulk of
its flora. Only 27 species are at present known with certainty from these
parts; whereas the number for Grinnell Land, which lies in the same
latitude and is only separated from N. W. Greenland by the narrow
Kennedy and Robson Channels, has supplied a list of at least 72 vas-
cular plants.
As an appendix to this historical review of the botanical exploration
of N. W. Greenland, and in order to facilitate the identification of the
different localities mentioned, I have compiled the following list of loca-
hities with their approximate place so far as it appears from the maps
to which I have access in the reports and journals of the different expe-
ditions, as well as from the English sea-chart of Smith Sound, the new
Danish map mentioned above, or from lists of determinations of places.
1898 —1902. No.16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W.GREENLAND. 23
The rough sketch-map accompanying the list, will further facilitate the
use of it.
List of N. W. Greenland localities, with their approximate
geographical position:
Cape York region:
Bushnan Island .
Cape York .
Ivsugigsok .
Cape Dudley Digges
Cape Atholl
Wolstenholme Sound:
Wolstenholme Island
Dalrymple Rock .
Saunders Island (Agpa)
Umanak . ......
Granville Bay (Iterdlagsuak)
Carey Islands:
Bjorling Island
Inglefield Gulf:
Burdin Bay
Natsilik (Netlik)
Netiulumi
Whale Sound tk
Northumberland Island (Kujata)
Hakluyt Island (Agpasuak) .
Cape Acland . F
Fan Glacier
Bowdoin Bay .
Redcliffe House .
M’Cormick Bay
Robertson Bay
Verhoef Nunatak.
Cape Robertson .
Glacier Valley .
Foulke Fjord region:
Sutherland Island
Cape Alexander .
Lat. N.
75° 59!
75° 55‘
10> 7
fo” 4
76° 23°
76° 24!
76° 28°
76° 35!
76° 30°
76° 45!
76° 49°
oe
ie
77° 10!
77° 15'
77° 22!
77° 24
?
2
77° 36°
77° 35‘
77° 38
77° 48'
77° 50°
77° 50
78° 9°
78° 10°
Long. W.
65°
651/2°
66°
69°
691/2°
70°
70°
701/.°
69°
69—70°
72°
71°
M14?
72°
69°
70°
691/5°
701/2°
70°
4?
73°
73°
H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Lat. N. Long. W.
Foulke Fjord ... . . « » 78° 18 72°
Port Foulke .
Point Jensen
Reindeer Point .
Etah baste Bs Be ok
Littleton Island (Pikira) . . 78° 23° 721/5°
Shore of Kane Basin:
Fog Inlet
Bedevilled Reach. 2 3
Renselaer Bay (Harbour). . 78° 37’ 71°
Butler Island . . . . . . 78° 87’ 71°
Bancroft Bay. . . . . . 78° 47' 69°
Mary Minturn River . . . 78° 25—47' 68—69°
Washington Land:
Lafayette Bay . . . . . 80° 30 68°
Bessels Bay . . . . . . 80° 45'—81°10' 63°
Cape Bryan . . . . . . 81° 9 64°
Hannah Island . .. . . 81° 10° 64°
Cape Morton . . . . . . 81° 41° 63°
Hall Land:
Polaris Bay <4 « « + « BL” 35? 62°
Peary Land:
Wood Point . . . . . . 82° 95°
Lockwood Island. . . . . 88° 94! 40°
1898—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 95
Cape B "Ce
Vi A
82"
804
“GREENLAND
26 H. G. SIMMONS. (SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Short Notes about the affinities of the Flora.
As far as I have been able to ascertain, the flora of N. W. Green-
land includes a number of 108 flowering plants and ferns, or 7 less than
that of Ellesmereland. There besides are 14 more recorded, which, how-
ever, almost certainly are not really members of the flora of our area.
Table II.
a) 7 Bes 73
2 |Z] 4 | 3/2/58
2/8 | 3 s | $8 | 5
S ge le ele le
3} 5 |) 5 s/o |] 36
g . : q :
Sait 2 |e | a
Blz2z|2 BH | 2a | 2
Compositae 7 6 6 Cruciferae. 13 12 12
Campaniulaceae 1 1 2 Papaveraceae 1 1 1
Scrophulariaceae . 4 6 3 Ranunculaceae . 6 6 6
Borraginaceae 1 Caryophyllaceae 10 10 12
Polemoniaceae . 1 Portulacaceae 1
Gentianaceae . . 1 Polygonaceae 2 2 3
Plumbaginaceae 1 1 1 Betulaceae 1 1
Primulaceae 1 Salicaceae ... 1 Q 2
Diapensiaceae . 1 1 1 Liliaceae . < 1 1
Ericaceae . 2 4 3 Juncaceae. . . .| 8 3 5
Pyrolaceae 1 1 1 Cyperaceae . . .| 15 9 17
Onagraceae . 1 1 1 || Gramineae . . .| 20 17 at
Empetraceae . 1 1 1 Lycopodiaceae . . 1 1 1
Rosaceae . 5 6 7 Eiquisetaceae. . . 2 1 2
Saxifragaceae . 12 9 11 Polypodiaceae . . 4 3 4
Crassulaceae. 1 Species | 115 | 108 | 128
Families | 24 | 927 28
1898—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 27
The 108 species belong to the families included in the above
table, of which each is represented by the number of species mentioned
in the column for N. W. Greenland. The corresponding figures for N. E.
Greenland and Ellesmereland are added to facilitate comparisons.
Already from the above table it appears that there is a consider-
able conformity between the floras of the three districts here compared.
The genera with the greatest number of species, are also nearly the
same in N. W. Greenland as in Ellesmereland; viz. Sawxifraga (11) 9,
Carex (11) and Ranunculus (6) 6, Pedicularis (4), Draba (5) and Poten-
litla (4) 5, Glyceria (4) 4. The figures in () represent the number of
species in Ellesmereland, where also Poa has 5 species (only 3 in
N. W. Greenland). Carew indeed appears to be far less represented in
the flora of N. W. Greenland, than in that of Ellesmereland or of
N. E. Greenland, where it reckons 13 species; but that most probably
is accounted for by the less accurate exploration of the first-mentioned
region, rather than, as Harr thinks, by a more arctic climate (Bot. Br.
Pol. Exp., p. 9).
Before, however, I go into further detail, I think it will be best to
facilitate the survey of the floras of N. W. Greenland and the neigh-
bouring lands by the following tabulated statements of the distribution
of the species (Table IIf). All the species found with certainty, either
in N. W. Greenland, N. E. Greenland, or Ellesmereland, are inserted
here; and further, their appearance in Danish West Greenland, in the ;
Arctic American Archipelago, or in the arctic parts of the American
Continent indicated. In the first column, that of Danish West Green-
land, a“—” before the figur of the approximative degree of limit, signifies
that the species is spread so far south; alter the figure, it signifies the
northern limit of the plant so far as known; the sign ‘““—” by itself, signifies
that it is spread along the whole coast. In the N. E. Greenland
column, the signs are used in the same manner. The distribution, how-
ever, south of Scoresby Sound is left entirely out of consideration as
being of no interest here. An “S” signifies that the species is not found
north of Scoresby Sound. As previously mentioned, I have only taken
up in the list, such E. Greenland species as are found from Cape Hold
with Hope (Broer Ruys) northward if they are not already entered as
N. W. Greenland or Ellesmereland plants.
In the column for N. W. Greenland, “‘S” signifies occurrence south
of the Humboldt Glacier, “N” northward from there. A “1” is used
for species found only in a single place. In the Ellesmereland column,
“S” ig used as the sign for occurrence in the southern, “N” in the
98 H. G. SIMMONS. (SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
northern part of the land, “H” for the Hayes Sound region, “+” for a
single locality.
In the columns for the Arctic American Archipelago, and for the
arclic part of the Continent, I have not been able to give such detailed
indications about the distribution as desirable; but have been reduced
to designating occurrence in some parts of the area in question only by
a “1”. In a few cases, I have had access to records which have made
it possible to give a hint about the probable way of immigration by
indicating different districts from where alone the species is known:
Baffinsland with “B”, the southern islands with “S’, the western with
“W”’, and the eastern part with “E”.
The last column contains references to the place of each species in
table VI.
Table III.
on 3 a | =
i=} | nm] g as
2\/Gul5u} & | 38/22.) Z
G3\/ae/88/ Ss | 32/288) 2
ZBolaeal| ea a ee |) S8e) &
ial o & BS o & | odes
20 oa lag | 6 ie ee 2
ie oe “So g oO ovo
8 ae) 69 = = )
Taraxacum arcticum . —70 E
—- hyparcticum . . S+ — + | + A
— phymatocarpum . |—70 | —70 S) S+ G-A-D
= pumilum... . SN + A—D
_ arctogenum. . . | —68 Ss G
Arnica alpina ...... |—64 _ Ss SN + + | U—A
Antennaria alpina ... . - 72—-| S+} H+) + + U
Erigeron uniflorus. . . . . | —64 — N + + U
— compositus ... . |—70 - S) N + + A
Campanula uniflora... . _ _ S SH + + U
_ rolundifolia . . 70-| .- B + Ss
Pedicularis capitata . . . . S+ =, + + A
= hirsuta... . |—64 - SN _ + + | U-A
- lanata. . . . . |—67 S+ | SN + + | A—D
- flammea.... — - S+ + D
_ arctica. . . . . S+ H W WwW A
1898—1902. No. 16] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W.GREENLAND. 29
= c S = a 5 =
a) ae r= = i & 2 eet 2
aa ae eh pt Bajepueal 2
23 as vo = £ go |*e8| &
ah o& Be 2 tie lon
gO), £35 | 28 g else
=) ang pe ~ ow n 7) oo9o me
o| BS |G | & le 825) 2
2 | Za Zz a | eos 5
= < 3 2
ie
Bartsia alpina... ... — 68— S+ Ss
Mertensia maritima . . . . |—68 S+ + S
Polemonium humile ... . —74 + E
Gentiana tenella . ... . — E
Statice maritima .... . - - S S- | + + U
Androsace septentrionalis . . N+ WwW A
Diapensia lapponica. . . . - S S+ | N+/ B E D
Myrtillus uliginosa. . . . . - 5 iS) SH | + + U
Vaccinium Vitis idaea . . . | —64 S+ + S)
Cassiope tetragona. . . . . |—64 _ 5 _ + + U
Rhododendron lapponicum. . _ _ S+ + + | A—D
Pyrola rotundifolia ... . _ 2B S) H+j| + + U
Chamaenerium latifolium . . _ - S = + + | U-A
Empetrum nigrum... . . - _ S H + + U
Dryas integrifolia .... . - 73'/o—| SN - + + A
— octopetala. ..... _ E
Potentilla pulchella. . . . . | —69 a S - + + | U-A
= rubricaulis. . . . ? |—74 s _ + + A
— nivea. . . . . . | —64 - s s ap U
— Vahliana . .. . |—69 Ss SN. | + + A
— emarginata . . . | —67 - SN _ + + | U-A
— maculata .... 70-| — ? 2 S)
Chrysosplenium alternifolium . S+ > 4+ a A
Saxifraga oppositifolia . . . = - SN |} — + + U
_ flagellaris. . . . —T2 SN | —- + + | A-D
_ aizoides. . ... — 7'Yo—| S+| St+ + + U
_ Hireulus . 1. . -72 S + + | A-E
— tricuspidata . . . | —64 70— S) _ + + A
— hieraciifolia . . . 73\— + + E
_— nivalis... . . _ - S) — + 7 U
_ stellaris. . . . . — -- Ss - + au U
_— groenlandica. . . - - SN _ + a U
= *exaratoides . . . ? S+ A-—D
- cernua .... + - — s _ + ae U
_ rivularis . 2. ef = - s - + + U
Rhodiola rosea . . 1... . = - + a. Ss
Hesperis Pallasii . 1... . SN | — + ly A
Braya purpurascens... . 70 = SN | SN] + + |U-A
Arabis Hookeri . . ... . |—64 S+ + A
— arenicla ..... 70—| 70 HN 25 A
Draba crassifolia . . . . . | 70--64| 73%/2— Ss
— alpina... .... | -69 = SN] - + + U
— fladnizensis. . . . . |-64 | — s — + + U
— subcapitata. .... ? ? ? SH} + | + A
— mnivdlis. ... 2... = - ) = + U
se art, a a a we — = SN - + + U
— imana ...... 70— S+ ? WwW s
30 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP, FRAM
ae oe ee
26 | 22/28) & (82 e5e] Ss
ae 2/38), 2 go jage &
ee | Oc |ee] &S | aa load
£O/| 83 |#3s] & Sle o8| &
Aan; ££ |S) 8 | oS Bes
g) 8S | ES] S | a iks0) 2
= Ai aan e fe | 2
i}
Lesquerella arctica . —69 — SN | — ee + A
Cardamine pratensis . 70—| 72— HN B + U
= bellidifolia - — s - + at U
Eutrema Edwardsii 70 72 S+) SN + + | U-—A
Cochlearia officinalis . - — SN | —- + + U
Papaver radicatum = = SN | —- + + U
Ranunculus glacialis . = E
= affinis . 67 | S+] S+) + + |U-A
= sulphureus —70 _ S _ + + U
_ nivalis . —68 - SN - + he U
= Sabinei. S$ SN + + A
: ec pygmaeus . = — Ss H =P U
= hyperboreus . _ — S+ | SH + + U
Arenaria ciliata —69 = S+) S+ ie U
Honkenya peploides = _ Ss B a U
Alsine Rossii . SN + + A
— verna . : —64 _ Ss - + + U
Sagina intermedia —63 = A+ + U
— nivalis —64 731 /o— D-S
Cerastium alpinum = = SN | — + + U
Stellaria humifusa = = Ss SH | + + U
— longipes _ - Ss — + + U
Melandrium affine —65 — SN | — a U
= triflorum —65 _ Ss ? G
_— apetalum —69 a SN _ + + | U-A
Silene acaulis = = Ss = + + U
Montia lamprosperma - S+ ? S
Polygonum viviparum ae a SN = + + U
Oxyria digyna - _ SN - + + U
Koenigia islandica a = 2 s
Betula nana —63 731,—-| S Ss
Salix arctica . rat = SN = + + |U-A
— herbacea = - ) + + U
Tofieldia palustris . a 7BYo—| S + + | A-D
Juncus castaneus 64—70| — B e s
— biglumis . = = SN = + + U
— triglumis 70-| — + + S)
Inuzula arcuata . ais = SN = + + U
— nivalis —64 _ S _ + + |U-A
Carex membranopacta SH + of A
-- capillaris . — 731/.— s B a U
-- ustulata . 70—73| 74 aa eco eee ee:
— misandra —67 = Ss = + _ U
— rigida . — | 7p-| Ss B|— | U
— salina . 7-| ~— Ss
— pedata . = S SH U
— rupestris . —67 — = U
1898 — 1902. No. 16.
FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND, 31
= 6 = >
S Ee eo 8 o |n g L
gael S32 Sel & feplieee| =
22] @8 | @2) 2 jes lees) o€
€6| $8 |ES| § | 4B leas) -
a ~» bret el 3 & n os zo a a
Z| s© | 82) 2 ea igeso, &
ee a ce ee:
oO
Carex aquatilis . _ = =e 4 A
— lagopina .« = = S
— glareosa . _ - S+ |} H+ B U
— ursina. ..? —69 - SH Ee U
— incurva . a _ S+ = as f. U
— nardina . = = SN = B + |U-A
— scirpoidea = 72— S+ B 2 | A=)
Kobresia bipartita . —64 7831/5 — Ss U
Elyna Bellardi . - = Ss ne + U
Eriphorum Scheuchzeri . _ — SN = + + U
= polystachium - — Ss = + + U
Agropyrum violaceum 70— N+ D
Festuca ovina — = SN _ + + U
— rubra “M-| — ? + Ss
Glyceria Vahliana . 71—70) S ? SH + U
=e tenella . 69—| 73? S+ D
-— angustata . —67 8 Ss SN + ? U
= distans . - B-— Ss — + U
= maritima . _ - Ss SH U
Dupontia Fisheri —69 — N+ | S+ + + |U-A
Poa glauca . —- — SS) - + + U
— abbreviata —70 - Ss - + + |U-A
— evagans . S+ D
— alpina. - _ 2 ? B + S)
— cenisia _ — SN _ + + U
— pratensis . ‘ - 72— ? SH | + WwW U
Pleuropogon Sabinei . 70—72 S+/ 8 + + |A—D
Catabrosa algida - = S oe + + U
Trisetum spicatum . — _ i) SN a + U
Aira caespitosa . — |—73}/2 S+ | SN | + + U
— flecuosa. ..... 69— S+ | H+ D—-S
Calamagrostis arundinacea m-| — )
Arctagrostis latifolia . —170 - Ss - + + U
Alopecurus alpinus . —62 _ SN _ + + U
Hierochloa alpina . - - S) SH + + U
Lycopodium Selago _ = Ss - + + U
Equisetum arvense . - - Ss — + + U
_ variegatum - - N+ | + + U
Aspidium fragrans —67 Ss S+]} H+] + + |U-A
Cystopteris fragilis . = = Ss - + + U
Woodsia ilvensis = _ H + + U
— glabella —67 _ S+ | SH + + U
The records of distribution condensed
in the above table, may, of
course be used in several ways for proving the affinity between the
floras of the regions here in question, N. W. Greenland and Ellesmere-
32 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC, ARCT. EXP. FRAM
land; and also for drawing conclusions about the causes of the simili-
tudes and differences between them, when compared with one another
or with the floras of adjacent lands. Before I enter into any further
discussion, I think it best to insert one more table, which may also be
of use in the following pages. It gives some particulars concerning the
distribution of species within N. W. Greenland.
Each of the districts principally investigated, has here got its column,
marked as follows:
Y = Cape York (including Bushnan Island, Ivsugigsok, and Cape Dudley
Digges).
W = Wolstenholme Sound (including Wolstenholme, Dalrymple and Saun-
ders Islands, and Granville Bay).
C = Carey Islands.
= Inglefield Gulf (Burdin Bay, Whale Sound, Northumberland and
Hakluyt Island, and coast to Cape Robertson).
F = Foulke Fjord.
R = Renselear Bay.
B = Bessels Bay and other localities in Washington Land.
P = Polaris Bay (Hall Land).
N = the northernmost parts.
In this table I have also inserted the doubtful species which are,
however, not taken into consideration in the following.
Table IV.
Y. | W. Cc. I. F, R. B. | P.| N.
Taraxacum hyparcticum . +
— phymatocarpum | +
- arctogenum . + +
Arnica alpina. , ... + + +
Antennaria alpina . 4
Erigeron compositus . . + +
Campanula uniflora . 2.) + +
Pedicularis capitata +
_ hirsuta. . . + +
— lanata. . «J +
- flammea . . +
- arctica. . . +
_ lapponica. . e
Bartsia alpina
Mertensia maritima
Statice maritima .
Diapensia lapponica .
++tt
1898—1902. No. 16] FLOW.PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND.
33
ae
W.
Myrtillus uliginosa .
Vaccinium Vitis idaea.
Cassiope tetragona . .
Loiseleuria procumbens .
Rhododendron lapponi-
Pyrola rotundifolia.
Chamaenerium latifolium
Empetrum nigrum .
Dryas integrifolia
Alchemilla vulgaris .
Potentilla pulchella .
—_ rubricaulis .
_ anserina .
_ nivea . . «
= Vahliana.
= emarginata .
= tridentata
Saxifraga oppositifolia .
— flagellaris .
- aizoides .
_ tricuspidata
_ nivalis —
- stellaris .
- groenlandica .
= cernua
_ rivularis
Hesperis Pallasti
Braya purpurascens
Arabis Hookeri
Draba alpina .
— fladnizensis .
— subcapitata .
— nivalis.
— hirta
-- imeana.
Lesquerella arctica .
Cardamine bellidifolia
Eutrema Edwardsit
Cochlearia officinalis .
Papaver radicatum.
Ranunculus affinis .
- sulphureus .
_ nivalis
— Sabine
- pygmaeus
i hyperboreus ,
Arenaria ciliata .
Honkenya peploides. ..
Alsine groenlandica
— verna
Cerastium alpinum .
++ t+ wttt
He She ge wtte ttt + ++ ++
++
++
t+
++
++tdt+ ++ ett Ft FHEteeettteee F+tt “ot
~~
++
+++
teewtt
$Heetttee +t
ttt
++
t+t+ett+
++
Fett+ +4
+-
++
++
34 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
| Y. W. C I F. R B P.| N
Stellaria humifusa . + + + +
— longipes. . . .| + + + + +
Melandrium affine . + + + + +
- triflorum . + + ti
- apetalum. . + Sa a +
Silene acaulis. . . . «| + + + +
Montia lamprosperma. +
Polygonum viviparum. + + + + +
Oxyria digyna + + + + + +
Betula nana... . 1] + +
Salix arctica + + + + + + + f+] +
— glauca : ?
— herbacea. . ...) + + +
Tofieldia palustris + +
Juncus biglumis . se aE + + +
Luzula arcuata . . . 1) + + + + + +
— nivalis. + + of
— spicata ?
Carex misandra. . . .| + + + ?
— riwida....., + +
— glareosa +
— incurva +
—- nardina.... + + + a
— scirpoidea. ... +
— dioica. ...., ?
Elyna Bellardi : + +
Eriophorum Scheuchzeri .| + + + + f
- polystachium | + + + +
Festuca ovina . ‘ + + + + + +
Glyceria Vahliana . 2
= tenella of
= angustata. . . + +
- distams . . . . + + ais
_ maritima...) + +
Dupontia Fisheri . . ., 4+
Poa glauca. ..... + + ae
— abbreviata .... + +
— alpina . es ?
— cenisia. . . . . wf] + + + + + 4a |
— pratensis . aes ?
Pleuropogon Sabinet . .| + ; 2
Catabrosa algida . . .| + + + + +
Trisetum spicatum . + + +
Aira caespitosa 4 +
— flexuosa. .... +
Agrostis canina . . . . ?
Arctagrostis latifolia . + + +
Alopecurus alpinus. . .| + + + af + 4. | Sb
Hierochloa alpina . . .| + + +
Lycopodium Selago. . .| + +
1898— 1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 35
Y. | W. Cc. I. F. R. B, |p, N.
Equisetum arvense . . .| + + +
Aspidium fragrans. +
Cystopteris fragilis . . . + + +
Woodsia glabella. . . . +
Table III contains 152 species which are members of one or more
of the floras of the three districts here specially in question; viz., N. E.
and N. W. Greenland and Ellesmereland. As for their appearance in
those and the neighbouring districts, they may be grouped as I have
done in Table V, where existence within a district is marked with a
“4”, absence of it with a “—”,
mind that some of the districts are very unsatisfactorily explored; and
that even in the relatively well examined tracts, additions will yet be
made that will very considerably alter the numbers, total as well as
relative. I think, therefore, that it will be better to discuss the
dubious species separately, and afterwards try to get as natural groups
as possible. However, I shall try to point out also, what results may,
in my opinion, be arrived at by using the rough statistics here put
It is, however, always to be kept in
together.
Table V.
=] g a § o Q
| Bs 3 |e6g/ee|a | 3
e a/iz/22| 2 (zalzals | 6
Group eS Feldalea| § l22/aol2 |s
Sjgslesias| gle Bl2slaal as
2 (ES/ES/ES] SB Sal Sa] E83]
Pia |4 |4 Bila |4 ‘le a
i} te) +] eee] ee
| 2 | +) +1 +] +i)]+i}-—-i) 2
I a | +) +/+] +4] —-] + 4
. 4, +/+} —] +] —] + 4
5. + + _ + + + 7
6. +/+] +]o4) -—-] - 3 | 90
a ee ee ge eee ee en
a ee ea meee es ee
IL. | 8.0) See | ae ae) ee eS 4
4 | +) —]| +] -}| -J] 7 2 | 12
1. - - - + + + 4
; | %2)/—-}| —-{| +] +) +4] + 5
Tl. 3. ee ee ee ee g
| 4, - - - + _ + 1
5. —} + f{+4i]+4/) ++ 3 | 15
36 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
5 Ble
te |e_l£_|¢/Selea/e |
a = a ik c=
S/S EGEiSE 2/23 25/3 [6
Group 2 elauite) - =e eee %
5 \aeistia | § |geleziag! -
2 /ES|sS/s5| & | e< e4|/F3| 2
sis ie lz alt |<4 2 eS
|
1} +/ +} —}; —| +] 4+] 5
Oe | ae ee ceo ed eee sae pa
im 3. +) —-] -—] + + 1] 7
1. = _ a pres _ - 2
V. { 2. - — — + + 1/ 8
1] +] +] +] —-{| +] +4] 7
a ee ee ee eee,
BP oe) ae |S ae el Gt
4, + - + _ = + 4
VL Be lee | Re PS see eaetie eee a
@ | ae | ae Peed ee ee
ef ett Albee ices h seer ogee Ml eel
8. _ + _ + + 1 | 2
In Table V., Group I. contains such species as have a rather
ubiquitous distribution in the Arctic Regions, or at least in the parts
here in question. Most of the plants, especially those of Gr. I, 1, are so
widely distributed, that they can hardly be used in comparing the di-
stricts, or for forming any conclusion about the origin of the flora. Some
may, however, be of interest, as will be shown in the following pages.
The following 50 species from Group I, are hardly of any interest
for this discussion:
Antennaria alpina*
Campanula uniflora
Statice maritima*
Myrtillus uliginosa*
Cassiope tetragona
Pyrola rotundifolia*
Empetrum nigrum
Saxifraga oppositifolia
aizoides
nivalis
stellaris
groenlandica
cernua
rivularis
Draba alpina
fladnizensis
hirta
Cardamine bellidifolia
Cochlearia officinalis
Papaver radicatum
Ranunculus sulphureus
nivalis
hyperboreus
Alsine verna
Cerastium alpinum
Stellaria humifusa
longipes
Silene acaulis
Polygonum viviparum
Oxyria digyna
Juncus biglumis
Luzula arcuata
Carex misandra
incurva
1898—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W.GREENLAND. 37
Eriophorum Scheuchzeri Aira caespitosa
— polystachium Arctagrostis latifolia
Festuca ovina Alopecurus alpinus
Glyceria distans* ~~ Hierochloa alpina
Poa glauca Lycopodium Selago
— cenisia Equisetum arvense
Catabrosa algida Cystopteris fragilis
Trisetum spicatum Woodsia glabella.
All these are circumpolar species, even though some of them, those
marked with a “*” are absent from Spitsbergen.
The Group I, 2, Carex glareosa and Glyceria angustata, not known
with certainty from the arctic coast of America, may yet be found there
and belong to the circumpolar, more ‘or less ubiquitous plants; as is
also the case with Group I, 3: Draba nivalis, Ranunculus pygmaeus,
Melandrium affine, Elyna Bellardi*, which are not yet collected in
the Arctic Archipelago but which will certainly be found there. Group
I, 4 contains 4 species, of which 3, Sagina intermedia, Carex ursina
and Glyceria Vahliana, as far as may be concluded from our present
knowledge of their distribution, will certainly yet be found in N. W.
Greenland and the Archipelago. Of the species as yet lacking in the
list of N. W. Greenland (Group I, 5), Erigeron uniflorus, Cardamine
pratensis, Carex capillaris*, Poa pratensis, Equisetum variegatum,
and Woodsia ilvensis*, will certainly be found there; the last species,
Carex ustulata, is, as far as our present knowledge goes, very spora-
dically distributed on the American side and especially in Greenland, but
is also circumpolar.
Lastly we get from Group I, 6, two species, Arenaria ciliata and
Glyceria maritima, not yet reported from any arctic part of America
besides Ellesmereland, which must also go here as having been pro-
bably overlooked in the Archipelago and Arctic Coast as well as in
Asia. Thus we get from Group I, 68 species which are circumpolar
and mostly rather ubiquitous. In the following these will be designed
as Group U.
We have still, however, 22 species of Group I left. Among these
the following 4 species from Gr. I, 1, decidedly have their home in
America: Erigeron compositus, Dryas integrifolia, Saxifraga tri-
cuspidata, Lesquerella arctica. To these may be added Arabis areni-
cola from Gr. I, 4. Alone of them, Dryas, goes over to the north-
eastern extremity of Asia. These species and some more mentioned
below, may form Group A.
38 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT, EXP. FRAM
There is, however, also a number of species so distributed as to
make it rather difficult to form a definitive opinion as to whether they
are to be referred to the american or to the ubiquitous plants.
Such are from Group I, 1: :
1. Arnica alpina, as it seems most widely spread on the Ame-
rican side and absent from Southern Greenland. In Ellesmereland it is
not found in the Hayes Sound region.
2. Pedicularis hirsuta, circumpolar but absent from Southern
Greenland.
3. Chamaenerium latifolium, lacking in Western Siberia, Scan-
dinavia and Spitsbergen, but appearing in Iceland. If this plant is to
be counted as american in Greenland, it should have reached Iceland
from the west. Here, however, as in some other cases also, two diffe-
rent ways of immigration may be possible.
4. Potentilla pulchella, only south to the Disco region, and absent
from Western Siberia and the European Continent.
5. P. emarginata, similarly distributed as the last.
6. Braya purpurascens, circumpolar, but only found about 70°
in Danish West Greenland.
7. Eutrema Edwardsii, circumpolar, bul very sporadic in Green-
land.
8. Ranunculus affinis, circumpolar, but only in a single place in
Danish West Greenland.
9. Melandrium apetalum, circumpolar, but only spread southward
to the Disco region.
10. Salix arctica, absent from Spitsbergen and the European
Continent, and represented in Greenland mostly by the var. Brownii, which
is principally american, and the var. groenlandica.
11. Luzula nivalis, absent from Southern Greenland.
12. Carex nardina, absent from Arctic Asia and Novaja Semlja,
but appearing again in Northern Finland, Scandinavia and Spitsbergen.
13. Dupontia Fisheri, civcumpolar, but only sparingly represented
in Greenland, where it is lacking in the south.
14. Poa abbreviata, most probably an american plant and absent
from Asia, but appearing again in Spitsbergen, Franz Joseph Land, and
Novaja Semlja. In Danish Greenland its southern limit is at the Disco
region, and in East Greenland at Scoresby Sound.
15. Aspidium fragrans, entirely absent from Europe, and with a
northerly distribution in W. Greenland, absent from E. Greenland except
for Scoresby Sound.
1898—1902. No. 16] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND, 39
All these plants are tolerably common and widely-spread in the
northern parts of America; in Greenland, they are in generai princi-
pally distributed in the northernmost parts, that is to say, where the di-
stance to the american area of the species is shortest. All of them,
moreover, have a more or less discontinuous distribution, the inter-
vening gap beginning either east of Greenland, or east of Spitshergen—
Novaja Semlja. If we are to reckon these plants among the american
immigrants, we must presume that those which inhabit, for instance,
Spitsbergen also, have reached there in the same way as the species of
Group II, 1 have come to N. E. Greenland, most probably along a for-
mer land-bridge. I will not now, however, give them any definite place,
but will reckon them alternatively to Group U, or Group A.
Now we have only 2 species from Gr. I, 1, left to discuss. Taraa-
acum phymatocarpum is only known from the northern parts of both
Greenland coasts and from a single locality in Ellesmereland. It may
be a Greenland plant and have reached Ellesmereland from there; but,
as its Ellesmereland locality is in a region where the american feature
is rather pronounced, it will more probably be found to have a wider
distribution in Arctic America. It can be counted either in Group A,
or in a Group G, containing Greenland plants, or also in the Group D,
species of dubious distribution. Diapensia lapponica has so curiously
interrupted a distribution, that one can hardly place it anywhere but in
Group D, even if it has probably reached N. W. Greenland, and per-
haps Ellesmereland, from Danish Greenland where it is common.
The 5 species forming Group II, 1, are doubtless all immigrants
from the east, as they are all found in Spitsbergen, mostly showing
also a wider distribution in Europe and Asia. In Greenland, they are
restricted to the northern parts of the east coast. Among them, Tar-
acacum arcticum, Gentiana tenella, and Ranunculus glacialis are
entirely missing in America, whereas Polemonium humile and Dryas
octopetala are found there, even though there is so wide an expanse
_ between their Ameircan and Greenland areas, as to make it impossible
to think of any connection between them. Those 5 species may form a
separate group E, to which also Sawifraga hieraciifolia (Gr. II, 2) may
be counted, as it shows a similar distribution, even if it is found in the
Arctic Archipelago also.
The 4 species of Group II, 3, show rather a curious distribution.
Melandrium triflorum is one of the few endemic species of Greenland,
and must of course go to Group G, where I have alternatively placed
Taraxacum phymatocarpum. It is, however, reported also for Grin-
40 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
nell Land. Bartsia alpina is found in America only in Labrador, but
it is rather a common plant in Southern Greenland. It must doubtless
have come to N. W. Greenland from the south, and is to be placed in
Group S. Betula nana is distributed in West Greenland from 63°
northwards, and, in the east coast, from the Angmagsalik district north-
wards to 731/,°. To the south it is replaced by B. glandulosa, but it
appears again in N. E. America, not, however, in the arctic parts. It
must also go to Group S, species spread in Danish Greenland, where
they are probably immigrants from Labrador and wandering northwards
from there. How it has reached Eastern Greenland is another question;
it may have come from Iceland, or its area may once have been conti-
nuous in the south. Glyceria tenella has so discontinuous a distri-
bution that it can only be placed in Group D.
Taraxacum arctogenum, in Group II, 4, is an endemic Greenland
species (Gr. G). Montia lamprosperma belongs to Group S, it is spread
to the south in Danish Greenland but seems to be lacking in Arctic
America. It may have reached Greenland from the east, as it is com-
mon in Iceland and the Faeroes: or from Labrador, where it seems to.
grow, if the indications of Brirron & Browy, Ill, Fl., I, p. 4, about
“Montia fontana’” are to be trusted and thus interpreted.
Group III, 1, contains 4 species of which one, Carex membrano-
pacta, is entirely american; two, Chrysosplenium alternifoliwm and
Alsine Rossii, are lacking in Greenland but reach from Asia as far
west as Spitsbergen or (the former) still further in the south. The fourth,
Draba subcapitata, is somewhat doubtful, but its distribution in Elles-
mereland and further to the south-west, shows that it is an american
species within the western parts of our special area at least. It is not
yet known with certainty from Greenland, but has a circumpolar distri-
bution reaching, on the Atlantic side, to Jan Mayen. These 4 species
are to be placed in Group A. Here belong also the species of Group
II, 2, which have reached N. W. Greenland. Taraxacum hyparcticum
and Ranunculus Sabinei are entirely american, Pedicularis capitata
and P. arctica are spread from Eastern Siberia throughout Arctic Ame-
rica. Hesperis Pallasii reaches as far west as Novaja Semlja. They
have doubtless come to Greenland over Smith Sound, as is also the
case wilh Potentilla Vahliana from Group II, 3. Pedicularis lanata
also seems to be an american immigrant in Western Greenland, where
it is common in the northern colonial districts. It is, however, a cir-
cumpolar plant, and appears also in a small area in S. E. Greenland.
1898—1902. No. 16] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..W.GREENLAND. 41
How it has got there is a somewhat more difficult question to solve.
I refer it alternatively to Group A, or Group D.
Androsace septentrionalis, forming Group III, 4, as absent from
Greenland goes to Group A. Group III, 5, contains 3 species, of which
one seems to be decidedly american, viz. Potentilla rubricaulis; the
two others are more dubious, and so give rise to a question as to
whether they should be placed in Group A, or in Group D. Sawifraga
flagellaris is spread round the Arctic Regions lo Spitsbergen, but its uni-
versal appearance throughout Arctic America and the islands, its manner
of distribution in Ellesmereland and in N. W. Greenland, make it most
probable that it is an american immigrant in Greenland. Pleuropogon
Sabinei is spread from Siberia to Novaja Semlja and Franz Joseph
Land; but its absence from Spitsbergen, and its range over the Arctic
Islands to Ellesmereland, make it probable that it has reached even
N. E. Greenland that way.
The 5 species in Group IV, 1, Campanula rotundifolia, Rhodiola
rosea, Juncus castaneus, J. triglumis, Poa alpina, must be reckoned
to Group S. In N. E. Greenland alone they are spread into the area here
in question, and none of them seems to reach its northernmost part. Even”
those of them which have an uninterrupted distribution in the south,
may, perhaps, have immigrated from both sides, as they are spread both
in Europe, inelnding Iceland, and in America. The same is the case
with Festuca rubra, which forms Group IV, 2. Carex aquatilis, Group
IV, 3, is absent from N. E. Greenland, and its distribution in the north-
ern part of Danish Greenland, points to an american origin. I there-
fore place it in Group A, notwithstanding that it is not found as yet in
N. W. Greenland.
In Group V, 1, we have the two new Ellesmereland species, the
distribution of which is as yet unknown; it is possible that Sawifraga
*exaratoides may count as american, Poa evagans must, however, be
left out of consideration at present. Taraxacum pumilum (Gr. V, 2)
most probably may be reckoned as american.
Group VI, 1, contains 7 species, all absent from Ellesmereland but
found in the five neighbouring districts entered in the table. Among
them, Potentilia nivea, Honkenya peploides, and Carex rigida, are
rather ubiquitous species that may yet be found in Ellesmereland.
I refer them to Group U, together with Salix herbacea, absent from
Spitsbergen (but found in Beeren Island and Jan Mayen) and perhaps
from the Bering Sea region. Tofieldia palustris and Carex scirpoidea
are absent from Western Siberia; Rhododendron lapponicum also from
49 H. G. SIMMONS, [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Spitsbergen; but their appearance in Europe makes it doubtful how they
should be reckoned in Greenland, especially as they are not found in
Ellesmereland, nor in the far north of Greenland. The safest way will
be to reckon them alternatively to Group A, and Group D.
Five of the species in Group VI, 2: Potentilla maculata, Koenigia
islandica, Carex salina, C. lagopina, and Calamagrostis arundina-
cea, entering our special area only in N. E. Greenland, may doubtless
be put in Group S, as may also Draba crassifolia, which just reaches
Cape Hold with Hope; perhaps also Sagina nivalis, which, however,
is a plant easily overlocked or confounded whith others, and may, there-
fore, probably be of wider range than is as yet known. Pedicularis
flammea (Gr. VI, 3) I think best to leave in Group D. It might also
be put in Group A, as being most spread in America; but it is not
known from any part of the Archipelago, and has certainly come to
N. W. Greenland from the south of Melville Bay. On the other hand,
it is known from Iceland and the northernmost parts of Europe, and I
think it may still be discovered in Siberia also.
The species of Group VI, 4, have doubtless reached N. W. Green-
land by way of Danish Greenland. One of them Arabis Hookeri, is
found on the arctic shore of America and consequently goes into Group A;
the three others, Mertensia maritima, Vaccinium Vitis idaea, and Draba
tmcana, are more or less circumpolar and ubiquitous species, which may
go to Group S. The 3 species in Group VI, 5, Carex pedata, C. rupe-
stris, and Kobresia bipartita, by their appearance in the most ameri-
can part of Ellesmereland, make it impossible to doubt that they exist
also in other parts of Arctic America, where they may have been
overlooked. If we presume their existence there, they may be put in
Group U.
Aira flexuosa (Gr. VI, 6) is decidedly a southern plant; its single
locality in N. W. Greenland is doubtless an outpost from its Danish
Greenland area, but how it has reached Ellesmereland is doubtful. I
think it best to place it in Group D. Still more difficult is it to form
an opinion as to the way by which Agropyrum violaceum (Gr. VI, 7)
has reached Grinnell Land, as it is not known from any locality in Arctic
America, either in the continent or in the islands; and there is an enter-
vening, space of more than 10° down to its northern limit in Greenland.
I place it in Group D.
Lastly we have Sawifraga Hirculus (Gr. VI, 8), which in Elles-
mereland is doubtless an american plant, but has, perhaps, reached
N. E. Greenland in the same way as have the species of Group E.
1898—1902. No.16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..W. GREENLAND. 43
As, however, this discussion is not easy to retain, I have, alter
stating my reasons for the division of the floras, put together the fol-
lowing table VI. Here the numbers of the plants of each group are
enumerated for each district separately, and for all three together; and,
besides them, accounts of the percentage in each group, reckoned in
relation to the number in the district, and to the total 152 species of the
three districts. As so many species have not been definitively placed,
two different series of figures must necessarily be put up alongside.
The last four columns are made up to show how nearly the figures
derived from the rough statistics of table V agree with those from the
more closely sifted material, at least, as to the relations to each other
of the percentages in the different districts.
Table VI.
* ol = . eis = an) . = =
& |S |£ Wa |e |S |e |e ;B IE
f eel ae | Salen Se | lawl e
ad : a n
6 Bei gg lis an| oh Ho 1S Buen ae!
4 ap | ose | - fo} mol so |e no! wo
my w]e || 3 wll Sa | os Ge od | sepg
Qn\|Oglokllaouni/osgl/og] S65 |an)/°8] 68
B.)3 5) 52) 8-8 lla SS | a8) 81 2
SSISS HSI SS/SSloal awl] soles) oe
a a, a Zz A, oO jaa) val ou a
North-Eastern
Greenland
Ubiquitous Group U...|| 75 | 58) 49] 90] 70/ 59] I 90 | 70| 59
Eastern — &£E 6 5 4 7 5 4
Greenlandic — G 2 1 1 1 1 1 i 10 7
American - A 98} 92) 19 6 5 4] Il 3 2 Q
Dubious =: UD ees 3 2 Q 9 7 6 || IV 6 5 4
Southern —~ SS...) 14] 12 9] 15] 12} 10) VI 19) 15) 12
Absent(oftotal152 species) || (24)) — 16 | (24); - 16 (24); — 16
128 | 100 | 100 || 128 | 100 | 100 128 | 100 | 100
North-Western
Greenland
Ubiquitous Group U... || 62 | 57] 41] 77] 71] 50 I 79 | 73| 52
Greenlandic — G... 2 2 1 3 3 2} Il 6 6 4
American — A.../| 84) 31; 22] 12) 11 8] Il 10 9 7
Dubious = (Dawes 4 4 3 || 10 9 7\| IV a — _
Southern en eee 6 6 4 6 6 4\| VI 13 | 12 8
Absent(oftotal152species) || (44)} — | 29 |} (44)| — | 29 (44); — | 29
108 | 100 | 100 || 108 | 100 | 100 108 | 100 ; 100
44 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT, EXP, FRAM
’ — — . — — P| . — —
ss leelBeis |B2/sel 22 is | Be] se
uw eo} Wo, 2) Wo) SB ie Oo} M5
oO we Ol Bll o te QB | 2 oO tO} AQ
eo Sega ee eel oe ee, * 8) oe
BilHE/SEl FS se lea| ou | Ss ee] 28
zie |j@ jz |e |£ Id lA |2 [2
Ellesmereland
Ubiquitous Group U... 71) 62| 47] 86) 75 | 57 I 90} 78] 59
Greenlandic — G..-j| — _ - 1 1 1 = wy |
American — a...| 40] 385!) 26] 19| 16] 12}/11,V} 18} 16] 19
Dubious = UDGars 4 3 3 8 7 5 || 1V 1 1 1
Southern 2 Sts: — — _ 1 1 1] VI 6 5 4
Absent (oftotal152species) || (87); — | 24 || (87)|_ — |_ 24 (37)| — | 24
115 | 100 | 100 || 115 | 100 | 100 115 | 100 | 100
The three districts
together
Ubiquitous Group U...]) 7 | — | 49) 90) — | 59 I 90 | — | 59
Eastern -— —E 6) - 4 6] — 4 = sel eas
Greenlandic — G 2) — 1 38/ — Q| II 19.) 8
American ee) - || 44 — 29 19 — 12 ||I1I, V| 18 = 12
Dubious — D 6) - 4) 16; —/} J1]) IV Trlr es 5
Southern - § 19; — 18/} 18) — 12 || VI 9) — | 16
152 | — | 100 |} 152} — | 100 152 | — | 100
When we give the group of more or less ubiquitous species the
largest possible range, so as to contain 90 species out of the 152, we
find 73 of them in all the three districts here specially in question; 4 are
absent from Ellesmereland, 13 from N. W. Greenland. The last number
will, however, be considerably reduced by further research. If, on the
other hand, we take the group of american species in its widest com-
prehension, embracing 44 species, we get them thus grouped: in all three
regions 23; in Ellesmereland and N. W. Greenland 7; in Ellesmereland
and N. E. Greenland 2; in Ellesmereland alone 8; moreover 4 species
not yet found in Ellesmereland but in N. W. Greenland (1) and as well
in N. E. Greenland (8).
These figures show clearly a gradual decrease of the number of
american species to the east such as, a priori, we had to look out for;
and the same is the case with the number of plants of decidedly ame-
rican origin. Of these, Androsace septentrionalis, Chrysosplenium al-
ternifolium, Alsine Rossii, and Carex membranopacta have only reached
eastward to Ellesmereland. To these may be added Sawifraga Hir-
culus, which may have reached N. E. Greenland from the east; Draba
subcapitata, not yet known with certainty in Greenland; and Carex
1898 — 1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 45
aquatillis var. stans, which will probably be found in N. W. Greenland
as its distribution in Danish Greenland points to an immigration from
the north. . :
N. W. Greenland is reached by the following american species, all
spread in Ellesmereland: Taraxacum hyparcticum, Pedicularis capi-
tata, P. arctica, Potentilla Vahliana, Hesperis Pallasii, Ranunculus
Sabinei and further by Arabis Hookeri which is not found in Ellesmere-
land. Erigeron compositus, Potentilla rubricaulis, Saxifraga tricus-
pidata, Lesquerella arctica reach to North-eastern Greenland, as also
Arabis arenosa which is found in Ellesmereland but not yet in N. W.
Greenland. Dryas integrifolia shows, so far as present researches have
gone, rather a curious distribution in East Greenland, one small area
north of latitude 65° and another larger one from about 70° to 73}/2°,
but it is not reported from the most northern known part of the coast.
As it is found so far north on the west coast as Lockwood Island,
there seems to be every possibility of its occurrence in the far north of
the east coast also, so as to account for its appearance in the south.
It may, perhaps, still be found to have a continuous area along the
east coast.
The most difficult question, however, is that connected with another
group of plants in N. E. Greenland, the eastern species: Taraxacum
arcticum, Polemonium humile, Gentiana tenella, Dryas octopetala,
Saxifraga hieraciifolia, and Ranunculus glacialis, to which Saxifraga
Hirculus must most probably be added (as far as this territory is con-
cerned). They are all Spitsbergen plants, even though some of them
are very rare in that country. Moreover they are found in Northern
Europe, and some at least, are widely distributed in Northern Asia also.
Four are also Iceland plants. It cannot of course be doubted that this
group of species has reached Greenland from the east; but the great
question is — how has such a migration heen effected? For those in-
vestigators, who are inclined to credit the winds and marine currents
with the capacity of transporting living seeds over almost unlimited di-
stances, and of putting them safely in a convenient spot for germinating,
the question is easily enough put aside, as we have the great polar current
which flows in against the east coast of Greenland. In my opinion,
however, there are some further problems to be solved.
Even if we take for granted, that the seeds of these plants possess
the required resistance to the influence of salt water, and that they can
stand an ice-journey of several years, and afterwards find their way to
convenient growingplaces in a new land, why are they entirely restric-
46 H. G. SIMMONS. _[SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
ted to the northern coast part? Why have they not spread southwards
along the coast when the same mode of conveyance might carry them
thither? And, moreover, why have they not gone over to the west
coast when the american species have reached the eastern shore? If we
assume, that there has been, in post-glacial time, a land-communication
along which they have wandered, we get at least a somewhat better so-
lution of the problem, even though every point may not be settled.
As the way along the Arctic American Archipelago was never glaciated
to any considerable extent, it lay open even in early post-glacial (or late
glacial) time, and thus the american species got under way northwards
very long ago. Some may even have lived in the islands during the
maximum of glaciation. The eastern species had a long way over
which to spread, and few only reached so far as Greenland before the
road of migration was made impracticable by the sinking of the land.
Changes of climate may also have played their part in restricting these
pioneers to their present small area, as well as in breaking up that of
some of the western species in isolated parts. Such a view also agrees
very well with some peculiarities in the distribution of marine algae,
especially the Laminariaceae, which I have pointed out elsewhere
(Stumons, Relations of Floras, p. 166—167).
Now the appearance of these eastern species is, indeed, the princi-
pal difference between the floras of N. E. and N. W. Greenland, but it
must not be overvalued; the number of species common to both, is still
more prominent. Even if we set aside the doubtful and ubiquitous spe- —
cies, we have left at least as many american as eastern species in the
flora of N. E. Greenland; and if we reckon all that have more or less
probably arrived from the american side, we get from four to five times
as many western as eastern plants. Among the three areas here com-
pared, that in N. E. Greenland shows the largest number of species. —
It must, however, be kept in mind, that it begins about three degrees
of latitude south of the two others, and the limit of the known part of
the N. E. coast coincides with the southern part of the western districts.
This may account for the presence here of so many (14—15) southern
species.
North-Western Greenland shows the smallest number of species.
I think, however, that this is in great part due to its very imperfect
exploration; 15 species, found both in Ellesmereland and in N. E. Green-
land, are absent from the N. W. Greenland list, but probably not in fact
from its flora. That this about holds the middle position between those
of the districts on each side, appears from the different tables above;
1898 —1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..W. GREENLAND. 47
but it comes a little nearer to that of Ellesmereland than to that of
N. E. Greenland. On the other hand, it is also connected with that of
Danish West Greenland, and if a border-line between a Greenland and
an american flora is to be drawn, we must let it follow Smith Sound
and its northern continuation and not make such a deflection as to
include Ellesmereland, as Hooker (App. Nares) has done. The almost
entire absence, in the Ellesmereland flora, of species that might have
come from Greenland, entirely prohibits its consideration as greenlandic.
The only species which may be of eastern origin are Taraxacum
phymatocarpum, Aira flexuosa, and further Melandrium triflorum,
if that plant is not erroneously reported from Grinnell Land, as I think
it is, and perhaps also Agropyrum violaceum. All these, however, are
of a far too sporadic appearance to give any greenlandic character to
the flora; whereas, on the other hand, the similarity to the flora of the
other American Islands is strongly marked.
I think it best with this to finish the sketch of the connections of
the North-Western Greenland flora at present. I am fully aware that
it is very incomplete; and I would accentuate the fact that it is by no
means to be considered as a definite treatment, but only as a preliminary
notice to an examination into the relations and history of the whole arctic
american flora, which I hope some time to have an opportunity of
finishing. I have also abstained from quoting here the different works
in which the history of the Greenland flora is discussed. Perhaps in
the mean time also the revision of the american collections may be
made, which, as I have above pointed out, is highly desirable. For
my own part, I must undertake a thorough revision of all the material
from Arctic America in the London collections, so as to be able to
make up lists of distribution for each species, and flora lists for each
island or group islands in the Archipelago as well as for different parts
of the arctic shore, before I feel myself justified in approaching nearer
to the phyto-geographical questions, the solution of which I look upon
as the principal object of my contributions to the knowledge of the
arctic american and Greenland flora and vegetation.
Lund, Sweden, November 1908.
48 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
The Species of Vascular Plants in the Flora of
North-Western Greenland.
In the following treatment of the different species I have followed
the same plan as in my Fl. Ellesm.; and, as by far the larger part of
the plants is common to both districts, I have not thought it necessary
to repeat such items as may easily be found there. Therefore I have
not here given a complete synonymic for species included in the Ellesmere:
land flora, but have only referred to the synonymic given in my previous
work. For species not treated there, I have given a synonymic on the
same plan as in FI. Ellesm. It is, however, impossible in many cases
to give an exact synonymic, for I have not seen all the specimens upon
which the identifications in the different papers concerning North-Western
Greenland are based, and therefore J have thought it best to insert, as
a “special synonymic” in [square brackets] the names used in these
treatises which I have, with more or less certainty, in some cases by
guess only, referred to the species in question.
The list of literature at the end of the book, is only intended to be
an appendix to that of the Fl. Ellesm. where most of the works that
have reference to the vascular plants of Arctic America and Greenland
are enumerated. The abbreviations of the titles used in the text are
also to be found there, as I have not deemed it necessary to repeat the
whole bibliography and as the two floras will always have to be used
together.
The statements about occurrence and distribution are made up in
the same manner as in my Fi. Ellesm., and when no account of the
latter is inserted here, it is to be found in that treatise. In the records
of occurrence I have used a “S” to signify the southern part (76°—79°)
and a “N” for the upper part of N. W. Greenland (from 80° northwards).
1898 — 1902. No. 16.| FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 49
Compositae.
Taraxacum hyparcticum, Dautst.
T. hyparcticum, Smmons, Fl. Ellesm.; 7. phymatocarpum, Hanvet-
Mazetti, Mon. Tarax., ex p.
Already during the expedition, I was in no doubt about the fact that
all the statements in literature about the Taraxacum-forms of N. W.
Greenland and the adjacent countries, must be based entirely upon wrong
determinations ; the plants may be called 7. officinale, T. palustre, T.
Dens Leonis, or any other name. The little I have seen of the collec-
tions made by others from the area here in question, has further con-
firmed my opinion, and I can only regret the impossibility of examining
the collections from most of the american expeditions. When Dr. DaHt-
stepT began his researches in arctic Taraxaca, now published in his
treatises Stud. arkt. Tarax., and Tarax. ceratoph., he also found that
the above names were generally used for plants representing new and
hitherto undescribed species. But it has been impossible for him also
to control the american authors; and it must still be left an open
question what they meant, except in a few cases where specimens have
been accessible, or where at least a guess is possible.
The species here in question has been examined by DAHLSTEDT in
my collection; but about its occurrence in other parts of the area than
that where I found it, only conjectures are possible.
Occurrence. This species is as yet only known with certainty ina
few individuals from a single locality in N. W. Greenland, Etah in Foulke
Fjord (4268, 4269). DanisTept found them mixed in my Taraxacum
collection from that point which, for the most part, represented 7. arcto-
genum Dautst. It is, however, rather probable that the 7. palustre
which Harr (Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.) speaks of as a form of T. Dens Leonis,
occurring in Foulke Fjord, is the same. T. palustre is also mentioned
by Duranp (Enum. Pl. Smith S.) as collected at Netlik by Hayes and
by Kane at Bedevilled Reach (Enum. Pl.); but without seeing the spe-
cimens it is impossible to form any opinion about the plant that is meant.
Taraxacum phymatocarpum, J. VAHL.
T. phymatocarpum, Stumons, Fl. Ellesm.; Hanpet-Mazetti, Mon.
Tarax., ex p. [Z. officinale, Naruorst, N. W. Gronl., ex p.; 7. off:
var. lividum, Fernatp in WeTHERILL, List 1894].
4
50 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
This species, principally greenlandic, has curiously enough, never
been mentioned from N. W. Greenland before I used the name in my
Prel. Rep., although in a wrong sense, as I had not then subjected my
Taraxaca to a closer study. In fact, the real T. phymatocarpum is
not present in my collection from Foulke Fjord, but DantstepT has
found it hiding under other names in collections from our area.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NaTHorstT); Whale Sound, Netiulumi
(WeruHeRILL). Hox, in his list of the Stern collection, has used for a plant
from Northumberland Island the same name (TZ. off. var. lividum) as
FERNALD in WETHERILL, List 1894; perhaps this statement also may be
referable to the species here in question.
Taraxacum arctogenum, DauLst.
T. arctogenum, Dautstept, Tarax. ceratoph., 1906; T. officinale,
Natuorst, N. W. Grénl., ex p.; J. phymatocarpum, Simmons, Prel.
Rep. et Bot. Arb., ex p.
Fig. Dauustept, |. ¢., T. 16.
When I published my first reports of the botany of the expedition,
I confounded this species with the common Ellesmereland plant, i. e. T.
hyparcticum; but later on I found that it came near to 7. ceratophorum,
which was already stated as a Greenland plant, although not mentioned
from the north-western parts. Dr. Dautstept, however, has founded a
new species on my material.
Occurrence. S, [vsugigsok (NatHorst); Foulke Fjord, abundant in
the gravelly and clayish slopes beneath Etah (198, 1473). Perhaps also
the 7. phymatocarpum from Etah in Hoim’s list of the Sretn collec-
tion may be referred here. Mr. Horm hat determined those plants be-
fore Danisrept’s treatises were published.
Distribution. Danish West Greenland (known from a single lo-
cality at 68° 35’).
Arnica alpina, (L.) Ouin.
A. alpina, Smnons, Fl. Ellesm. [A. alpina, Meewan, Contr. Greenl.;
WetseERILL, List 1894].
This species was first brought home from “near Smith’s Sound,
78°” by Kang, but as it was not found by subsequent expeditions,
Nartuorst enters it in his list (N. W. Grénl.) as doubtful. Later expedi-
tions have, however, found it in several places.
1898— 1902, No. 16.| FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..W. GREENLAND. 514
In Foulke Fjord, probably the same locality where Kane had
collected it, it grew in the sward of the slopes beneath the rookeries of
the little auk.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (Stem); Inglefield Gulf: Verhoeff
Nunatak (Meznan), Fan Glacier (WeETHERILL); Foulke Fjord, inside Etah
(225, 1502).
Antennaria alpina, (L.) GAERTN.
A. alpina, Stmmons, Fl. Ellesm. (A. alpina, Natuorst, N. W.
Gronl.].
The specimens from the only locality in N. W. Greenland that I
have seen in the Stockholm herbarium, belong to a form whose leaves
are rather densely woolly-haired on the upper surface also.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NatHorsT).
Erigeron compositus, Pursu.
E. compositus, Stumons, FI. Ellesm. [#. compositus, Harr, Bot.
Br. Pol. Exp.; Mrewan, Contr. Greenl.].
Curiously enough, this handsome plant has been totally overlooked
by most of the previous visitors to Foulke Fjord, where, however, it is
rather abundant in the gravelly slopes, forming large tufts with numerous
heads of flowers. Many were still in flower when I first visited the
place, Aug. 16, 1898. :
Occurrence. S. Inglefield Gulf (MezHan); Foulke Fjord (FEILpEn),
at Etah (215, 1475).
Campanulaceae.
Campanula uniflora, L.
C. uniflora, Stumons, Fl. Ellesm. [C. uniflora, Natuorst, N. W.
Gronl.].
This plant has entirely escaped the american collectors unless the
C. rotundifolia var. linifolia of Duranp, Enum. pl. Smith S., should be
referred to this species. But that plant is recorded from the dubious
locality ““Tessiussak” and therefore must be left out of consideration.
It might, with better reason perhaps, be presumed that the “gentian” of
which Kang, I Grinnell Exp., p. 142, speaks as being seen somewhere
between Cape York and Cape Dudley Digges, is the present species.
52 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Duranp, Enum. Pl., mentions no Gentiana', and it seems very impro-
bable that any species of that genus should have reached so far, as no
Gentiana is found elsewhere north of 69° in Western Greenland.
Occurrence. S.Ivsugigsok (NaTHoRsT); Foulke Fjord, above Etah
(1505).
Scrophulariaceae.
Pedicularis capitata, ApamMs.
P. capitata, Stmmons, Fl. Ellesm. [P. capitata, Harr, Bot. Br.
Pol. Exp.].
This species, first discovered by Hart to be a native of Greenland,
is still found only in the same locality, where it grew rather sparingly
among the grass along small rivulets.
Occurrence. S. Foulke Fjord, Port Foulke (Hart), Point Jensen
(CopPINGER), plateau above Etah (219).
Pedicularis hirsuta, L.
P. hirsuta, Simmons, FI. Ellesm.; OstTenreip, Plantes N. E. Grénl.
[P. hirsuta, Duranp, Pl. Kan. et Enum. Pl. Smith 8.; Harr, Bot. Br.
Pol. Exp., ex p. ?; Natuorst, N. W. Gronl.; Meenan, Contr. Greenl.;
WETHERILL, List 1894; P. Kanei, Hayes, Op. Pol. Seal.
This species is doubtless equally common in our area as it is in
Ellesmereland and in Northern Danish Greenland. I have explained in
Fl. Ellesm. how difficult it is to ascertain what some authors have
understood by their names for the species of Pedicularis, and therefore
I only refer to what is said there. In the following, the localities are
named that can without any doubt be referred to the present plant.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (WetHERILL); Ivsugigsok (NaTHORST);
Wolstenholme Sound (INGLEFIELD); Inglefield Gulf: Northumberland Is- |
land (Stem); M’Cormick Bay (MegHan); Foulke Fjord: Port Foulke
(Hayes) and many other places (226); Fog Inlet (Kane); Rensselaer Bay
(Kang). N. Bessels Bay (Hart). This locality is not certain, as Hart
has also used the name for P. lanatd.
Pedicularis Janata, Cuam. & ScHLECHTEND.
P. lanata, Simmons, FI. Ellesm. [P. Kanei, Duranp, Pl. Kan.; P.
Langsdorffit var. lanata, Wetuerit, List 1894].
1 Indeed in PI. Kan. he makes the supposition that Sawifraga oppositifolia might
be the “gentian” of Kane. Natuorsr (Nachtr.) has already made the same con-
jecture about Campanula uniflora.
1898—1902. No. 16] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W.GREENLAND, 533
As I have previously (1. c¢., p. 29) mentioned, the P. Kanei of
DuranpD! belongs to the present species, while his P. lanata is really
P. hirsuta. Of the later collectors, only Werxeritt records a P.
Langsdorffit var. lanata, which may probably be rightly determined.
As [ did not find it in Foulke Fjord, nor did Naruorst at Ivsugigsok,
it is probably a rare plant in this part of Greenland.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (WetTHeRILL); “Smith Sound Stati-
ons” (KANE).
Pedicularis fammea, L.
P. flammea, Linnarus, Sp. Plant., 1753; Lance, Consp. FI. Greenl.;
Kruusg, List E. Greenl.; Wetuerttt, List 1894; Hooxer, Fl. Bor. Amer.;
Britton & Brown, Ill. Fl.; Lepesour, Fl. Ross.; Hartman, Skand.
Fl.; Grontunp, Isl. FI.
Fig. Linnaeus, Fl. Lapp., T. 4, f. 2; Fl. Dan., T. 1878.
I have seen no specimens of this plant from any locality within the
area, but as it is mentioned by Frernatp, whose identifications are
generally reliable and who has evidently been able to discern the other
species, I do not hesitate to enter it for the area.
Occurrence. S. “Quite abundant in low ground at Cape York”
(WETHERILL).
Distribution. East Greenland, West Greenland, Arctic America,
Labrador, Rocky Mountains, Alaska, Arctic Russia, Northern Scandi-
navia, Iceland.
Pedicularis arctica, R. Br.
P. arctica, Simmons, FI. Ellesm. [P. arctica, Duranp, Pl. Kan.].
I have not myself seen specimens of this plant from our area, but,
as previously stated (I. c., p. 32), there cannot be the slightest doubt that
the P. arctica of Duranp, PI. Kan., is the real one.
Occurrence. S. Rensselaer Harbour (Kang).
.
Pedicularis lapponica, L.
As I have previously (Fl. Ellesm., p. 34) shown, Harr (Bot. Br.
Pol. Exp., p. 35) must somehow have confounded either his specimens
of Pedicularis from different stations, or the characters of the species;
‘ In Enum, pl. Smith Sound, the author does not mention his new species as
having been found by Haves, but in Op. Pol. Sea, the name P. Kanez is substi-
tuted for P. hirsuta probably by mistake.
54 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
for he mentions this plant from places where it certainly does not grow.
This view is confirmed by the absence of specimens from the Nargs
expedition in the London collections. The statement about its occurrence
in Foulke Fjord must be left out of consideration.
Bartsia alpina, L.
B. alpina, Linnagus, Sp. Plant., 1753; Lancs, Consp. Fl. Groenl.;
Krvuse, List E. Greenl.; Wetueritt, List 1894; Hooxer, FI. Bor. Amer.;
Britton & Browy, Ill. Fl.; Lepesour, Fl. Ross.; Hartman, Skand. FI;
Groniunp, Isl. FI.
Fig. Sv. Bot., T. 573; Fl. Dan., T. 43.
There exists an old statement that this plant is found in North-
Western Greenland, but it is one of the doubtful ones from ‘“Tessiussak,
Sept. 4” in Duranp, Enum. pl. Smith S., and, as previously explained,
cannot be taken into consideration. Natsorst, N. W. Grénl., therefore
rightly excludes it, but it has since been found by Werneritt and
consequently belongs notwithstanding to the flora of this region.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (WETHERILL).
Distribution. East and West Greenland, Labrador, Arctic Russia,
Scandinavia, the Alps and Pyrenees, Great Britain, Faeroes, Iceland.
Borraginaceae.
Mertensia maritima, (L.) 5. F. Gray.
Pulmonaria maritima, Linnatus, Sp. Plant., 1753; Steenhammera
maritima, Reicnensacu, Fl. Germ. exc.; Mertensia maritima, Gray,
Nat. Arr. Br. Pl.; Weraeritt, List 1894; Lepesour, FI. Ross.; Sten-
hammaria maritima, Lance, Consp. Fl. Groenl.; Ksettman, in Vega-
exp.; Hartman, Skand. Fl.; Grénzunp, Isl. Fl.; Lithospermum mari-
timum, Hooxer, FI. Bor. Amer.; Pneumaria maritima, Brirton &
Brown, Il. FI. ;
Fig. Fl. Dan., T. 25.
I have not seen this species which is not found elsewhere further
northward than about 72°, but I enter it on the authority of WETHERILL.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (WeTHERILL).
Distribution. West Greenland, Arctic America, Labrador, down to
Newfoundland and Massachusetts, from Oregon to Alaska, islands of the
Bering Sea, Land of the Chukches, down to Kamshatka and the Amur
Territory, Arctic Russia, Scandinavia, Denmark, Great Britain, Faeroes,
Iceland.
1898—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 55
Plumbaginaceae.
Statice maritima, Muu. var. stbirica, (Turez.) Sim.
St. maritima var. sibirica, Stumons, FI. Ellesm. [Armeria vulga-
ris, WETHERILL, List 1894; A. vulg. var. labradorica, Duranp, Enum.
pl. Smith S.].
This plant was excluded from the flora of North-Western Green-
land by Naruorst, N. W. Gronl., because he thought it rather improb-
able that it should grow so far north, and as there was only the
doubtful statement of Duranp, Enum. pl. Smith S., to prove that it had
been found there. But since that time it has been collected by Weru-
ERILL in several places, and moreover I have myself found it in Elles-
mereland. Consequently there seems no cause for the exclusion of the
locality of Duranp, “Netlik”, which lies very near one of the localities
of WETHERILL.
I have not seen the latter’s specimens, but I think it must be taken
for granted that the plant of North-Western Greenland is the same as
that in Ellesmereland, North-Eastern Greenland and the Northern Danish
colonial districts. Consequently I have set the name used by WerHER- —
ILL as a synonym, as well as that of Duranp, which in Hayes’s own
list, Op. Pol. Sea, p. 399, is altered to A. labradorica. But, as I have
discussed it in Fl. Ellesm., the real A. labradorica is not found in
Greenland.
— Occurrence. S. Cape York (WeTHERILL); Whale Sound; Burdin
Bay (Srery), Netiulumi (Weruerity), Netlik (Hayes); Cape Acland and
Fan Glacier in Inglefield Gulf (WeTHERILL).
Diapensiaceae.
Diapensia lapponica, L.
D. lapponica, Simons, Fl. Ellesm.; Werueriy, List 1894.
Here, as in some other cases in the first part of my Fl. Ellesm.,
the localities recorded by Werxermt have been overlooked and his
paper not quoted in the synonymic as it should have been. The north-
ern limit of this species will thus be altered from 74° 18’ to about 76°.
It is for this also that I have given a reference to his work in the
synonymic which as to the rest is to be found in FI. Ellesm.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (WETHERILL).
56 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Ericaceae.
Myrtillus uliginosa, (L.) Dres. var. microphylla, (Lance) Simm.
M. ulig. var. microphylla, Simmons, FI. Ellesm. | Vaccinium uligi-
nosum, Duranp, Pl. Kan. et Enum. pl. Smith S.; Harr, Bot. Br. Pol.
Exp.; V. ulig. var. microphyllum, Naruorst, N. W. Gronl.; V. ulig.
v. mucronatum, WerTHERILL, List 1894).
This plant seems to be rather common within the area, as it is
‘present in most collections. Fernatp (in WETHERILL, |. c.) uses the
name “var. mucronatum, Herper” for it. I have not been able to find
out where that variety is established or how it is characterized; but
probably the name cannot apply to our plant. Moreover V. mucrona-
tum of Linnagus, Sp. Plant., is shown to be a plant belonging to the
Aquifoliaceae, Nemopanthes fascicularis, Rarin.
Here, as in Ellesmereland, the size of the leaves is very variable,
and as WETHERILL mentions, specimens may be found that have quite
as large leaves as those of the type.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NaTHorst); between Cape York and
Cape Dudley Digges (Kane); Inglefield Gulf: Netlik (Hayes), Cape Ac-
land and Fan Glacier (WeTHERILL); Foulke Fjord (Hart), especially in
the grassy slopes above Etah (245).
Vaccinium Vitis idaea, L.
V. Vitis idaea, Linnagus, Sp. Plant., 1753; Lancs, Consp. Fl. Groenl.;
SuTHERLAND, Voyage; Natuorst, N. W. Grénl.; Hooxer, FI. Bor. Amer.;
Britton & Browy, Ill. Fl.; Kerman, in Vegaexp.; Frmopen, Fl. Pl. Nov.
Zeml.; Lepepour, FI]. Ross.; Grontunp, Isl. FI.
Fig. Fl. Dan., T. 40; Sv. Bot., T. 116.
I have entered this species in the list on the authority of Suruzr-
LAND, who has it in his list, notwithstanding that I have seen no speci-
men in the London collections. It is, however, not improbable that it
occurs at the northern coast of Melville Bay, as it is found up to the
northernmost parts of Danish Greenland.
Occurrence. S. Bushnan Island (SurHERLAND).
Distribution. West Greenland, Arctic America, Labrador, down
to the Northern United States, British Columbia, Alaska, islands of the
Bering Sea, Northern and Middle Asia, Europe, Novaja Semlja, Great
Britain, Iceland.
4898—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 57
Cassiope tetragona, (L.) D. Don.
C. tetragona, Simmons, FI. Ellesm.; Ostenretp, Plantes N. E. Gronl.
[C. tetragona, Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Natuorst, N. W. Grénl.; Wetu-
ERILL, List 1894; OsTENFELD, FI. pl. Cape York; Andromeda tetragona,
Duranp, Pl. Kan. et Enum. pl. Smith Sj].
This plant seems to take as prominent a place in the vegetation on
the Greenland side as it does on the western side of Smith Sound.
Occurrence. S. Bushnan Island (SurTHERLAND); Cape York (Hart,
WetueRILL); between there and Cape Dudley Digges (Kane); Ivsugigsok
(Natuorst); Umanak and Agpa in Wolstenholme Sound (Battg); Gran-
ville Bay (My.ius Ericusen); Inglefield Gulf: Northumberland Island
(Stein), Cape Acland, Bowdoin Bay and Robertson Bay (WETHERILL);
Port Foulke (Hayes); Foulke Fjord (Hart), abundant at Reindeer Point
and Etah (Stern, 252); Fog Inlet, Bedevilled Reach and Rensselaer Bay
(Kane).
Loiseleuria procumbens, (L.) Desv.
This plant has been recorded by Kang, I Grinnell Exp., p. 143,
from a place between Cape York and Cape Dudley Digges and later was
entered in Natuorst, Nachtr. Now as the plant is found north of 74°
in Danish Greenland it would seem very probable that it also grew here,
but it is not mentioned in Duranp, Pl. Kan., and Kane himself men-
lions it in such a way, as to make it very doubtful whether he, who
was not much of a botanist, had not perhaps quite another plant in
front of him. The lines in question run thus:— “.... the wild honey-
suckle (Azalea procumbens) of our Pennsylvania woods—I could stick
the entire plant in my button-hole”. Now the name “honeysuckle” is
used not only for the species of Lonicera of which several grow in the
woods of Pennsylvania, but also for Azalea, but hardly 1 think for A.
(Loiseleuria) procumbens, a plant moreover which is not found further
south in the Eastern States than on the summits of the White Moun-
tains of New Hampshire and of course not as a common plant in woods.
Were I to venture a guess at the plant Kane has seen, I should
be most inclined to think of Rhododendron lapponicum, which has
since that time been found in the same neighbourhood; but at all events
the statement of Kane must be left entirely out of consideration.
Rhododendron lapponicum, (L.) WAHLENB.
Azalea lapponica, Linnagus, Sp. Plant., 1753; Rh. lapponicum,
WantenserG, Fl. Lapp.; Lance, Consp. Fl. Groenl.; Kruuse, List E.
58 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Greenl.; Werneritt, List 1894; Hooker, Fl. Bor. Amer.; Britton &
Brown, Ill. Fl; Ksetuman, Fan. Vestesk. land; Lepesour, FI. Ross.
Fig. Linnagus, Fl. Lapp., T. 6, f. 1; Sv. Bot., T. 481; FJ. Dan., T. 966.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (WeETHERILL).
Distribution. East and West Greenland, Arctic American Archi-
pelago, Arctic America, Labrador, mountains of the northern United
States, Rocky Mountains, Alaska, Northern Russia, Northern Scandinavia.
Pyrolaceae.
Pyrola rotundifolia, L. var. grandiffora, (Rav.) DC.
P. rotund. var. grandiflora, Stumons, FI]. Ellesm. [P. rotundifolia
var. grandiflora, OstTenFrELp, Fl. pl. Cape York; P. rot. var. pumila,
Werueri.1, List 1894; P. chlorantha, Duranp, Pl. Kan.].
This plant was first mentioned by Duranp, Pl. Kan., as P. chlo-
rantha, but he afterwards corrected the name in Enum. Pl. Smith 5.
Natuorst, however, has it as doubtful. No specimens were available
and it is only recorded for “Smith Sound Stations” by Duranp; more-
over, the specimens of Hayes, who also has it in his list under the
same name, are from the problematical ‘“Tessiussak”. This induced
Natuorsr to put a “?” for it in his table (N. W. Gronl.). But since
the appearance of the last mentioned paper, the plant has been found
in several places.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (WeTHERILL); between that point and
Cape Dudley Digges (Kang, I Grinnell Exp., p. 143); Umanak and
Saunders Island (Agpa) in Wolstenholme Sound (Baie); Bowdoin Bay
in Inglefield Gulf (WetuertLL); Foulke Fjord, near Etah (216).
Onagraceae.
Chamaenerium Jatifolium, (L.) Sweet.
Ch. latifolium, Simons, FI. Ellesm. [Epilobiwm latifolium, Hart,
Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Wernerity, List 1894).
To judge from the few points within our area from which this spe-
cies is known as yet, one would think it to be rather rare there; but
probably it will in general flower scarcely, as is also the case in Elles-
mereland, and, in its sterile state, it may easily be overlooked by col-
ectors who are not trained botanists. In Foulke Fjord I saw only one
single flower.
1898—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 59)
Occurrence. S, Wolstenholme Sound: Saunders Island (Agpa) and
Umanak (Bate); Cape Acland and Fan Glacier in Inglefield Gulf (Werx-
ERILL); Foulke Fjord (Hart), in gravelly places near Etah (242).
Empetraceae.
Empetrum nigrum, L.
E. nigrum, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm. [E. nigrum, Duranp, Pl. Kan.;
Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Weruerity, List 1894].
As I have previously (I. c., p. 42) gone into details abouth the North-
West Greenland Empetrum-form, it is not necessary to reiterate that
discussion. My specimens from Foulke Fjord decidedly belong to the
variety purpureum, (Rariy.) DC., as doubtless also do those of Hayes,
which Duranp, Enum. pl. Smith S., has called HZ. rubrum. The plant
of Hayes’s collection is reported by Duranp, |. c., p. 95, from the prob-
lematical ‘“Tessiussak”. The fact that the red-fruited form is nowhere
found in Danish Greenland, seems to tell against the supposition of
Matueren, Grinnell Fl., which as I have discussed (p. 14), is for the rest
supported by several circumstances. The Empetrum specimens may,
in fact, belong to another collection. In Foulke Fjord the plant grew
under similar conditions as in Ellesmereland. Ripe fruit was found
August 11, 1899.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (WerTHERILL); “Smith Sound” (Kane);
Foulke Fjord (Harr), near Etah (1500).
Rosaceae.
Dryas integrifolia, VAuL.
D. integrifolia, Simmons, FI. Ellesm. [D. integrifolia, Duranp, Pl.
Kan. et Enum. pl. Smith S.; Natnorst, N. W. Gronl.; Osrenrep, FI.
pl. Cape York; D. octopetala (et var. integrifolia), Duranp, |. ¢.; Hart,
Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Mezuan, Contr. Greenl.; Weruerity, List 1894;
Bessets, Exp. Pol. Amer. et Amer. Nordpol Exp.; NatHorsr, N. W:
- Gronl.].
As I have previously stated (I. c., p. 43—45) all reports about Dryas
forms from the area here in question, are as far as they have been
controlled by examination of specimens to be referred to this species.
No D. octopetala is found there as far as I know, and I feel quite
justified in transferring to this place the statements about D. octopetala
made by Duranp in his treatments of the collections of Kane and of
Haves.
60 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Some specimens indeed belong to the var. intermedia, Natu. [have
it in my Foulke Fjord collection, OsTenFeLp reports it as having been
brought home by My.ius Ericusen, and it has also been seen and
collected before Natuorst (N. W. Grénl.) distinguished it from the typ-
ical form of the species. To this the reports about D. octopetala also
may in general be referred. It is, however, only a local form produced
by certain conditions. Besides I have also found the var. canescens,
Smm., in Foulke Fjord (1888).
D. integrifolia equally as in Ellesmereland seems also to be a
very common and widely distributed plant in the adjacent parts of
Greenland where it reaches even to the most northern part of the
country. Still I think it is best to give a list of the places where it is
noted from.
Occurrence. S.Cape York (Hart, WeTHERILL); Ivsugigsok (Nat-
Horst); Umanak and Agpa (Saunders Island) in Wolstenholme Sound
(Batxe); Granville Bay (Iterdlagssuak) (MyLius Ericusen); Inglefield Gulf:
Northumberland Island (Ste); Netlik (Hayes), Fan Glacier and Cape
Acland (Weruerit), Verhoef Nunatak (MEEHAN), Robertsons Bay (Wetu-
ERILL); Foulke Fjord (Hart, Stein, 199, 1497, 1521, 1883); Bedevilled
Reach, Rensselaer Bay and Mary Minturn River (Kane). N. Bessels Bay
and Hannah Island (Hart); Polaris Bay (Hart); Lockwood Island
(Lockwoop).
Alchemilla vulgaris, L.
Not having seen any specimens I can, of course, form no opinion
about the plant, that Duranp, Enum. pl. Smith S., records under this
name from Netlik. No Alchemilla is found north of Melville Bay by
any other collector, which makes it also doubtful if the plant in question
really was found there and not in Danish Greenland. Consequently the
safest way is to leave it out of consideration until more reliable inform-
ation about it can be produced.
Potentilla pulchella, R. Br.
P. pulchella, Smumons, Fl. Ellesm.
As is already in some measure shown in my FI. Ellesm., there is
much difficulty about using the statements of the older authors about
the arctic Potentillae. As for P. pulchella, this name is to be found
in the lists of different authors, but it is rather difficult to form any
opinion about the plants that they have had in view. As none of them
has been able to discern P. rubricaulis, Lenm., it is always possible or
* 48981902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 61
even probable, that the latter plant may hide under some of the state-
ments about P. pulchella and P. nivea. At all events P. pulchella
seems to be rather a rare plant in N. W. Greenland. Besides my own
specimens which represent a form from rather dry localities and which
somewhat resemble the corresponding form of P. rubricaulis, I have
only seen specimens collected by Narxorst (also nearly approaching
P.rubricaulis) and by Hart. The P. pulchella of Duranp, Enum. pl.,
according to the description must be P. rubricaulis, and the same per-
haps is the case with the Port Foulke plant of Haves.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NaTHorst); Port Foulke (Hayes,?);
Foulke Fjord, on a sandy beach near Reindeer Point (1529).
Potentilla rubricaulis, Len.
P. rubricaulis, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm.; Wotr, Mon. Gatt. Potent.
[P. rubricaulis, OstENFeLp, F'. pl. Cape York; P. nivea var., Natuorst,
N. W. Gronl.; Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp., ex p.?; P. pulchella, Durann,
Pl. Kan. ?].
This species is probably more common in our area than is the
preceding one, but as already mentioned, it has always been overlooked
and confounded with others. At Etah it was not rare in the grassy
and gravelly slopes. I am very much inclined to think that the P. pul-
chella of Duran is really the present species. His description clearly
shows that he has not had the real P. pulchella in front of him for
he says: “Flower rather large, of a deep yellow colour; petals obcord-
ate, longer than the calyx”. '
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NatHorst); Umanak and Agpa in
Wolstenholme Sound (Batxe); Etah in Foulke Fjord (221, 1461, 1882);
Rensselaer Bay and Mary Minturn River ? (KANE).
Potentilla anserina, L.
As previously mentioned (Simmons, Fl. Ellesm., p. 54), there are no
specimens to confirm Hart's statement (Bot. Br. Pol. Exp., p. 29) about
the occurrence of this species at Foulke Fjord, and as it has not been
found so far north by other collectors, it must be excluded from the
flora of our area.
Potentilla nivea, L.
P. nivea, Linnagus, Sp. Plant., 1753; Leymann, Revis. Potent.; Ryp-
BERG, Mon. Amer. Potent.; Wor, Mon. Gatt. Potent.; Lanes, Consp. FI.
62 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Groenl.; Kruuse, List E. Greenl. and List Angmags.; Hart, Bot. Br.
Pol. Exp., ex p.?; Naruorst, N. W. Gronl., ex p.?; Wetueritt, List
1894, ex p.; Hooker, Fl. Bor. Amer.; Brirron & Browy, Ill. Fl.; Lepe-
sour, Fl. Ross.; Fempen, FI. Pl. Nov. Zeml.; Anpersson & HeEsseEt-
MAN, Spetsb. Karly.
Fig. Fl. Dan., T. 1035.
As this species is rather common, or at least widely spread in the
northern parts of Danish Greenland, it would seem probable that it
should also grow in the region to the north-west. Indeed it is recorded
by almost every traveller who has visited our area, yet notwithstanding,
I have no doubt about my right to cancel most of their statements.
As I have discussed in my Fl. Ellesm. and above, most of them are
quite useless on account of the confusion of different species. Hart
(Il. c.), for instance, notes it as “common everywhere”, but all his speci-
mens in the London collections belong to other species, Duranp has
certainly used the name in a wrong sense both in Pl. Kan. and in Enum.
pl. Smith S., and as far as I can see, there is only the record of Wetu-
ERILL from Whale Sound which is most probably right, which may be
used. For my part I have only found it within a small area in Foulke
Fjord. P. nivea also after the removal of the falsely included species,
such as P. Vahliana, P. rubricaulis, and others, is yet a rather vari-
able plant. Even at the Foulke Fjord locality three forms of it can be
distinguished. The rarest of them is the form with rather broad, rounded
leaflets, having short teeth (205, 4270), as the plant generally appears
in Europe. Somewhat less sparingly found was the form that is the
most common in the arctic regions, especially in Greenland, which has
longer and narrower leaflets that are more deeply incised (1460). This
form corresponds to the variety 6 pinnatifida of LeHmann, whose ¢
pentaphylla again includes the most luxuriant forms with 5-digitate
leaves occurring in greater abundance. However, none of my specimens
can be referred to the latter. But in another respect they are somewhat
different. Some of them show the typical dense white woolly clothing
of the lower surface of the leaflets, but others are almost entirely quite
green (or reddish). They do not, however, quite agree with the « swb-
viridis of LenMann, nor are they referable to var. pallidior, Swartz,
Sum. Veg. Scand. The plant in this state indeed shows a rather close
resemblance to the P. Hookeriana, Leum., such as it is figured in Rev.
Potent., T. 55, but that species of which specimens are entirely lacking
in all collections to which I have had access, is said to have the leaves
white-tomentose on bolh sides. Such specimens are distributed under
1898—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..W. GREENLAND, 63
No. 4271, but I have deemed it best not to give them any separate
name.
Occurrence. S. Whale Sound: Netiulumi (Werueritt); Foulke
Fjord: grassy slopes and ledges near Etah (205, 1460, 4270, 4271). All
older statements must be excluded even though it may be probable that
the plant has a wider range within the area here in question.
Distribution: East and West Greenland, southern islands of the
Arctic American Archipelago, Arctic America, Labrador, Canada, New-
foundland, Rocky Mountains down to Utah and Colorado, British Co-
lumbia, Eastern Siberia, down to the Himalayas and the Caucasus, Arc-
tic Russia, Northern and Alpine Scandinavia, the Alps, Novaja Semlja,
Spitsbergen.
Potentilla Vahliana, Lenn.
P. Vahliana, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm.; Wotr, Mon. Gatt. Potent.
[P. Vahliana, Natuorst, N. W. Groénl.; Werueritt, List 1894; Osren-
FELD, Fl. pl. Cape York; P. nivea, Durann, Pl. Kan.].
Owing to the confusion with other species, especially P. nivea, in
the statements of most authors, it is difficult to form any distinct opin-
ion about the range of this plant, as I have already shown (I. c¢., p. 55).
I will, however, try to give a list of the places where it is found as far
as can be judged from the statements in literature or from specimens
seen in the collections.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (WeTHERILL); Ivsugigsok (NaTHoRST);
Umanak and Agpa in Wolstenholme Sound (Baie); Carey Islands:
Bjérling Island (WeTHERILL); Netlik (Hayes); Foulke Fjord: gravel and
clay plains near Etah (210, 1498); Rensselaer Bay (Kane). Probably also
further northward, as it is found in Grinnell Land.
Potentilla emarginata, Pursu.
P. emarginata, Smmons, FI. Ellesm.; Osrenretp, Plantes N. E.
Gronl. [P. emarginata, Mecuan, Contr. Greenl.; WerTseriy, List 1894;
OstenFELD, Fl. pl. Cape York; P. fragiformis, Naruorst, N. W. Gronl.;
P. frigida, Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Wetueritz, 1 c.; Duranp, Pl.
Kan.; P. nivea 8 concolor, Durann, I. c.].
Probably this species is common throughout the area, as most
collectors have brought it home. Most authors seem also to have been
able to distinguish it from others; but still it seems fairly probable that
the P. nivea 8 concolor of Duranp, Pl. Kan., p. 190, belongs to it, as
doubtless does his P. nana.
64 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Occurrence. 8S. Cape York (Stem); Ivsugigsok (NatHorst); Wol-
stenholme Sound: Umanak and Agpa (Bate); Wolstenholme Island
(Meenan); Granville Bay (Iterdlagsuak) (Myurus Ericusen); Inglefield
Gulf: nunatak in Verhoeff Glacier (MeeHAN); Fan Glacier and Bowdoin
Bay (WerueriLt); Northumberland Island (Stern); Foulke Fjord (Hart),
slopes and ledges at Reindeer Point and Etah (Srein, 4216, 4217); Fog
Inlet (Kane); Rensselaer Harbour? (Kane). N. Polaris Bay (Coppincer).
Potentilla tridentata, Sot.
This species is recorded by Duranp, Pl. Kan., p. 191, from Rens.
selaer Harbour, but as it is hardly found north of the Disco region, there
has doubtless been some confusion of specimens and consequently it is
not to be reckoned as a member of the flora of this region any more
than is P. maculata, Pourr., which Natuorst has through some mis-
take entered in his table (N. W. Gronl., p. 31) for Rensselaer Harbour.
Duranp, however, does not record any such plant for that locality
either in Pl. Kan., or in Enum. pl. Indeed he speaks of a “P. nivea
B concolor”, which Lance, Consp. Fl. Groenl., p. 6, has thought to be
P. maculata, but I cannot see any sufficient reason for his conjecture.
Duranb, indeed, speaks of “two flowerless specimens”, but besides this
he also describes the flower and gives three localities for it which shows
that he has had more specimens before him than the sterile ones. Most
probably the plant from Rensselaer Bay has been P. emarginata.
Saxifragaceae.
Saxifraga oppositifolia, L.
S. oppositifolia, Simmons, FI. Ellesm.; Ostenrecp, Plantes N. E.
Gronl. [S. oppositifolia, Duranp, Pl. Kan. et Enum. pl. Smith 5.;
Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Greety, Rep.; Natuorst, N. W. Gronl.;
Meenan, Contr. Greenl.; Werueritt, List 1894; Ostenretp, Fi. pl.
Cape York].
This plant, presumably the most common of all arctic species, seems
to be equally abundant in N. W. Greenland as in Ellesmereland in
nearly every kind of vegetation. Still I will give a list of the places
from whence it is noted.
Occurrence. S.Cape York (Hart, WeTHERILL); Ivsugigsok (Nat-
Horst); Granville Bay (Iterdlagsuak) (Mytius Ericusen); Umanak and
Agpa (Saunders Island) in Wolstenholme Sound (Batts); Carey Islands:
1898—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. — 65
Bjérling Island (WerHERILL); Inglefield Gulf: Redcliffe House (Megan),
Robertson Bay, Cape Acland and Fan Glacier (WetuHERILL), North-
umberland Island (Stein); Foulke Fjord: everywhere (Hart, Hayes, STEIN,
201). N. Lafayette Bay (Kane); Bessels Bay and Polaris Bay (Hart);
Lockwood Island (Loockwoop).
Saxifraga flagellaris, Wii.
S. flagellaris, Simmons, FI. Ellesm. |S. flagellaris, Duranp, PI.
Kan.; Hayes, Op. Pol. Sea; Harr, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Mgenan, Contr.
Greenl.; Ostenretp, Fl. pl. Cape York).
This species is one of the decidedly northern immigrants in Green-
land, where it seem to be most abundant in the northernmost parts.
Jn the western coast, it does not even reach as far down as Melville
Bay (if the certainly mistaken statement of Kane for Disco is excluded).
Occurrence. S. Wolstenholme Sound: Umanak and Agpa (BaLLe);
Inglefield Gulf: Northumberland Island (Stet), M’Cormick Bay (MEEHAN);
Cape Alexander (Hayes, Op. Pol. Sea, p. 80); Foulke Fjord: Point Jen-
sen (CoppincER), Reindeer Point (197), Etah (Stet), at the bottom of the
Fjord at an altitude of 1200—1500 ft. (Harr); Fog Inlet and Rensselaer
Harbour (Kane). N. Lafayette Bay (Kane).
Saxifraga aizoides, L.
S. aizoides, Stmmoys, FI. Ellesm. [S. aizoides, Meenan, Contr.
Greenl.].
Occurrence. S. Wolstenholme Island in Wolstenholme Sound,
and M’Cormick Bay in Inglefield Gulf (Meguay).
Saxifraga tricuspidata, Rotts.
S. tricuspidata, Simmons, FI. Ellesm. [S. tricuspidata, Dick, Not.
fl. pl, in Incterretp, Summer Search; Durann, Pl. Kan. et Enum. pl.
Smith S.; Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Natuorst, N. W. Groénl.; MEEHAN,
Contr. Greenl.; WeTHERILL, List 1894; Osrenrexp, Fl. pl. Cape York].
Occurrence. S. Cape York (WeTHERILL); Ivsugigsok (NaTHoRsT) ;
Wolstenholme Sound: Agpa (Saunders Island) and Umanak (BALLE);
Inglefield Gulf: Burdin Bay (IncLerretp), “Common everywhere, on the
Verhoeff Nunatak” (MeeHan), Bowdoin Bay and Northumberland Island
(WerHeErRILL, Sten); Foulke Fjord: Port Foulke (Hayes), Etah, Reindeer
Point, and other localities (Hart, Stern, 227); Fog Inlet and Rensselaer
Harbour (Kane).
5
66 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT, EXP, FRAM
Saxifraga nivalis, L.
S. nivalis, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm.; Osrenretp, Plantes N. E. Gronl.
[S. nivalis, SurHerLAND, Voyage; Duranp, Pl. Kan. et Enum. pl. Smith
S.; Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Nataorst, N. W. Gronl.; Osrenrexp, Fil.
pl. Cape York].
Only the main form seems to have been found in N. W. Greenland.
Occurrence. S. Bushnan Island (SuTHERLAND); Ivsugigsok (Nat-
Horst); Umanak and Agpa in Wolstenholme Sound (Batts); Inglefield Gulf:
Northumberland Island (Stem); Foulke Fjord: Port Foulke (Hayes), and
different places near Reindeer Point and Etah (Hart, Stem, 207, 1489);
Fog Inlet, Bedevilled Reach, and Rensselaer Harbour (Kang).
Saxifraga stellaris, L.
S. stellaris, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm. [S. stellaris, Naruorst, N. W.
Gronl.; S. foliolosa, Durann, Pl. Kan.].
As I have previously mentioned, this plant usually appears in the
state representing the var. comosa, Retz.; only some of the specimens
from the southernmost locality —Ivsugigsok—have the terminal flower
developed.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NarHorst); Northumberland Island
(Stein); Foulke Fjord: moist mossy places near Reindeer Point (244,
1493); Fog Inlet (Kane).
Saxifraga groenlandica, L.
S. groenlandica, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm.; S. caespitosa, OSTENFELD,
Plantes N. E. Grénl. [S. caespitosa, Duranp, Pl. Kan.; Hart, Bot. Br.
Pol. Exp.; Werueritt, List 1894: OsTenrexp, Fl. pl. Cape York].
All the specimens from our area seem to belong to the variety
uniflora, (R. Br.) Simm., such as I have described it (I. ¢., p. 71—72).
Occurrence. S. Cape York (Hart, Werueritt); Wolstenholme
Sound: Umanak and Agpa (Bate); Inglefield Gulf: Northumberland Island
(Stein); Foulke Fjord at Etah (Stem) and other places (Harv, 251, 1506);
Rensselaer Harbour (Kane). N. Bessels Bay and Polaris Bay (Har).
Probably everywhere.
Saxifraga cernua, L.
S. cernua, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm.; Ostenreitp, Plantes N. E. Gronl.
[S. cernua, Dickie, Not. fl. pl. in Ineerretp, Summer Search; Durano,
Pl. Kan. et Enum. pl. Smith S.; Harr, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; NatHorsr,
1898-1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..W. GREENLAND. 67
N. W. Gronl.; Meeuan, Contr. Greenl.; Werneritt, List 1894; Osten-
FELD, Fl. pl. Cape York}. ;
Very common, but abundant only in manured places such as rook-
eries and old places of habitation. Some individuals may be branched,
but more than a single flower is rarely developed.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (Srery); Ivsugigsok (Natuorst); Wol-
stenholme Sound (InGLerte.p): Umanak and Agpa (Battie), Inglefield
Gulf: Northumberland Island (Srew, Werxerm), Cape Acland (WertH-
ERILL), Verhoeff Nunatak (Mrenan); Foulke F jord: Reindeer Point, Etah,
etc. (202, Srem, Hart), Port Foulke (Hayes); up to 80° (Kang) and
doubtless also to the north.
Saxifraga rivularis, L.
S. rivularis, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm.; Ostenretp, Plantes N. E. Gronl.
[S. rivularis, Duranp, Enum. pl. Smith S.; Harv, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.;
Natuorst, N. W. Grénl.].
Besides the common, taller, and often branched form, I also found
the same small form that I have mentioned from Ellesmereland (I. c.,
p. 76), and according to Mr. Hotm the var. purpurascens, Lance, is
collected by Stern.
Occurrence. S.Cape York (Hart, Stern); Ivsugigsok (NaTHORST);
Inglefield Gulf: Northumberland Island (Stet), Netlik (Hayes); Foulke
Fjord (Hart), in several places near Reindeer Point (238, 248, 1488).
Cruciferae.
Hesperis Pallasii, (Pursu.) Torr. & Gray.
H. Pallasii, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm. [H. Pallasii, Duranp, Enum. pl.
Smith S.; Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Meruan, Contr. Greenl.].
This plant also belongs to the little group of decidedly american
immigrants in N. W. Greenland. It seems to be somewhat more spread
there than was known when Natuorst made his revision of the flora
of that area (N. W. Gronl.). At Etah it grew fairly abundantly in the
gravel ledges, and the plants were for the most part luxuriant, having
several stems. They had ripe pods in abundance when collected about
the midle of August. ,
Occurrence. S. Cape York or M’Cormick Bay in Inglefield Gulf?
(Burk according to Meewan); Netlik (Hayes); Foulke Fjord, at Etah
(Hart, 240, 1474); at Mary Minturn River (Kang). N. Lafayette Bay
in Washington Land (Morton according to Kang).
68 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Braya purpurascens, (B. Br.) Bunce.
B. purpurascens, Simmons, FI. Ellesm. [B. alpina, Hart, Bot. Br.
Pol. Exp.; B. glabella, Meruan, Contr. Greenl.].
As already shown by Gexert (Not. Arct. Pl.) the Braya of N. W.
Greenland is not B. alpina, Sterns. & Hopps, as little as is the Grinnell
Land plant, which Hart (Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.) also has ranged under the
same name. I have myself seen the specimens upon which Harr based
his determination, in the London collections. For my part I did not find
it, nor has any other collector seen it in Foulke Fjord.
Occurrence. S. Inglefield Gulf, M’Cormick Bay (Megnan). N.
Polaris Bay (Coppincer).
Arabis Hookeri, Lance.
A. Hookeri, Lane, Consp. Fl. Groenl., 1880; Simmons, Prel. Rep.
et Bot. Arb.; Turritis mollis, Hooker, Fl. Bor. Amer. 1840; non Ara-
bis mollis, STEVEN.
Fig. Fl. Dan. T. 2296.
Curiously enough, this plant, although occurring in abundance on
the rich clay plain at the old Eskimo settlement Etah, has not been
found, or at least is not mentioned, by any previous collector in these
regions. Neither do specimens from our area exist in the collections;
but still there might be a possibility that Harr brought home frag-
ments of it, which Lance may have seen, for the latter author states
(l. c., p. 48) that Harr has found A. alpina, L., at Foulke Fjord. Harr
himself, however, mentions A. alpina only from the well-known local-
ities at Disco, and Turritis mollis only from Proven (Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.,
p. 24). At all events A. Hookeri is an addition to the flora of N. W.
Greenland.
The species, however, does not appear here in its typical form, with
only one or a few (2—3) erect stems from the rosule. As the Foulke
Fjord plant differs also in some other respects, [ think it best to describe
it as a new variety:
var. multicaulis, n. var.
Perennis, multiceps, ramis floriferis numerosis (saepe 10 vel plur-
ibus) decumbentibus, brevibus (10 cm.). Folia numerosa, dense rosulato-
congesta, pro maxima parte per fructificationem persistentia. Racemi
densi, pedicelli patuli, 0.5 cm. longi. Siliquae quam in forma typica
majores, 2—4 cm. longae, leviter curvatae. Semina flavo-brunnescentia.
1898 —1902. No 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 69
As appears from this diagnosis, the variety differs from the type in
the mode of growth, the taproot carrying a number of branches, with
dense rosules of leaves, and several flowering branches again springing
from each rosule, the number of inflorescences thus often amounting to
a dozen or more. The branches are much shorter than the erect stems
of the type, and lie postrate on the ground, radiating out on all sides.
The seeds are yellow or somewhat brownish, not dark brown as Lance
describes those of the type. They are for the most part placed in two rows.
A few half-withered white flowers were still to be seen in some plants
when I collected the specimens, August 11, 1899; most of the plants had
the greater part of the pods already quite ripe. In 1898, when I visited
the same places a few days later, I saw only rosules of leaves, no flow-
ering or fruiting specimens were then found.
Occurrence. S. Foulke Fjord: at Etah (1466) and in the rookeries.
Distribution (of the main species): Northern Danish West
Greenland, Arctic America (shore of the Polar Sea).
Draba alpina, L.
D. alpina, Simmons, FI. Ellesm.; Ostenretp, Plantes N. E. Gronl.
(D. alpina, Dickie, Not fl. pl. in IncLerreLp, Summer Search; Duranp,
Pl. Kan. et Enum. pl. Smith S.; Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Naruorsr,
N. W. Gronl.; Meenan, Contr. Greenl.; Wetuerity, List 1894; Osren-
FELD, Fl. pl. Cape York; D. glacialis, SutHERLAND, Voyage; Dicxin, |. c.;
Duranp, Pl. Kan.}.
I collected only a few individuals at Foulke Fjord, where the spe-
cies seems to be less common than in Ellesmereland. One of them repre-
sents the var. glacialis, (Apams) Ksetim., which is recorded by previous
authors for several localities, of which I do not, however, think it nes-
sessary to give any specification, as there may be a question as to
what the different authors have understood by the name. Specimens,
belonging probably to var. gracilescens, Stum., I have seen in NaTuorst’s
collections from Ivsugigsok.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NatHorst); Wolstenholme Sound
(IncLerreLp), Umanak and Agpa (Batus); Inglefield Gulf: Burdin Bay
(IncLerreLp), Fan Glacier, Cape Acland (WeTHertt), M’Cormick Bay
(MegHan), Glacier Valley near Cape Robertson (WETHERILL), Northumb-
erland Island (Stzin); Foulke Fjord: Port Foulke (Hayes), Etah (1504) ;
Bedevilled Reach (Kane); Rensselaer Harbour (Kang). N. Lafayette Bay
(Kang); Polaris Bay (Hart).
70 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP, FRAM
Draha fladnizensis, Wutr.
D. fladnizensis, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm.; Ostenretp, Plantes N. E.
Gronl. [D. fladnizensis, WetueRiLt, List 1894; D. Wahlenbergii, Nav-
uorst, N. W. Gronl.; D. rupestris, Duranp et Hart, ex p.?].
Not one single earlier author has mentioned this species, although
it is very probable that some of the localities recorded for D. rupestris
may really belong to it. This, however cannot to be decided and conse-
quently I can give only a few in the southern part of our area.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NarHorst); Inglefield Gulf: North-
umberland Island (Sretn), Fan Glacier, Cape Acland, and Glacier Valley
at Cape Robertson (WeETHERILL); Foulke Fjord, in several places (Srety,
206, 218, 1484, 4181).
Draba subcapitata, Simm.
As I did not myself find this species at Foulke Fjord, and as |
have seen no indisputable specimens of it from the area, I can not assert
that it is to be found there; but I think that some badly preserved
specimens which I have seen belong to it, and, further, some statements
in literature seem to indicate that it has been found by other collectors.
I should be inclined to refer to it the D. Wahlenbergii var. brachycarpa
of Naruorst, found at Ivsugigsok, but the specimen I have seen in the
Stockholm collection is not enough to justify any decided opinion. The
description of the varieties corymbosa and micropetala, which Duranp
(Pl. Kan., p. 187) gives under D. alpina, of plants collected by Kane
at Bedevilled Reach and Rensselaer Harbour also seem to indicate that
hardly any other species can be meant. Most authors, however, have
treated their Drabae in such a manner, that it is impossible, without
having the material at my disposal for inspection, to form any opinion’
about the plants that hide under the different names. There is especi-
ally the name D. corymbosa, which is used to cover the most diverse
things which the authors have not been able to classify. Several state
ments I have necessarily been obliged to leave entirely out of consi-
deration.
Draba nivalis, Livses..
D. nivalis, Stumons, Fl. Ellesm. [D. nivalis, Naruorst, N. W.
Grénl.].
This species seems to be rather rare within the area as it is only
recorded by one of the later authors; it may of course, however.
1398—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..W. GREENLAND. 71
have been previously overlooked or confounded with other species. For
my own part, I found very little of it.
Occurrence. S, Cape York (Stein); [vsugigsok (NatHorst); North-
umberland Island in Inglefield Gulf (Stem); Foulke Fjord (4199).
Draba hirta, L.
D. hirta, Stwmons, Fl. Ellesm. [D. hirta, Drcxis, Not. fl. pl. in
INGLEFIELD, Summer Search; Meeuan, Contr. Greenl.; D. rupestris, Dur-
anp, Pl. Kan. et Enum. pl. Smith S.; Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; D. arc-
tica, Natuorst, N. W. Grénl.].
This species also is so confounded with others by the authors, that
it is very difficult to give any detailed statements about its occurrence
within the area. It may, however, be taken to be fairly common. My
specimens and those of Natuorst belong to the variety arctica, (J.
VauHL) Wats.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NatHorst); Inglefield Gulf: Burdin
Bay (Incuerretp), Nunatak in Verhoeff Glacier (MeeHay), Netlik (Hayes);
Foulke Fjord, Etah (MeeHan, 220, 1496); Rensselaer Harbour (Kane).
N. Polaris Bay (Hart).
Draba incana, L.
D. incana, Linnazus, Sp. Plant. 1753; Gevert, Not. Arct. Pl;
Lance, Consp. Fl. Groenl.; Kruuse, List Angmags. ; Wertuerit, List
1894: Hooker, Fl. Bor. Amer.; Brirron, & Brown, Ill. Fl.; Lepesour,
Fl. Ross.; D. confusa, Enruart, Beitr. Naturk.; Hooker, |. ¢.
Fig. Fl. Dan. T. 130.
Although this plant is not spread north of 70° in Danish Greenland,
there is still not sufficient cause for any doubt of the statement of WerTH-
ERILL, and therefore I enter it on his authority. !
Occurrence. S. Netiulumi in Inglefield Gulf (WerHeritt).
Distribution: East Greenland up to 61°, West Greenland up to
70°, Labrador, Canada, Western Arctic and Temperate America, Rocky
Mountains, Unalaschka, Kamshatka, East Siberia, Altai, Himalayas, Cau-
casus, Ural, Northern Russia, Scandinavia, mountains of Central Europe,
Great Britain, Faeroes, Iceland.
1 When I wrote my FI. Ellesm., 1 was not aware that Werneritt had recorded
D. ineana from N. W. Greenland. Taken together with this statement, the re-
cord of D. borealis from Grinnell Land becomes a little more probable as the
latter name signifies one of the forms of D. incana. It may, however, be that
both records ought to be in fact transferred to D. hirta.
72 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC, ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Lesquerella arctica, (Wormsks.) Wats.
L. arctica, Simmons, FI]. Ellesm. [Z. arctica, WETHERILL, List 1894;
Vesicaria arctica, Duranp, Pl. Kan. et Enum. pl. Smith S.; Harz,
Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Megnan, Contr. Greenl.].
This plant is not common within the area, probably most spread to
the north. I have not seen it there, and it has not previously been
found in Foulke Fjord.
Occurrence. S. Inglefield Gulf (Meenan), Netlik (Hayes), Burdin
Bay (Srem), Fan Glacier (Werueriit); Mary Minturn River (Kang).!
N. Polaris Bay (Hart).
Cardamine bellidifolia, L.
C. bellidifolia, Simmons, FI. Ellesm.; Ostenrexp, Plantes N. E. Grénl.
[C. bellidifolia, Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Natuorst, N. W. Grénl.].
Not observed by any other collectors but Harr, Narnorst, and
myself; but probably overlooked by others because of its small growth.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NatHorst); Foulke Fjord: Reindeer
Point (1483, 1530), at the front of the glacier (Hart).
EHatrema Hdwardsii, R. Br.
E. Edwardsii, Stumons, FI]. Ellesm.
A very rare plant in Greenland, where it is previously found only
in two localities, Umanak in Danish Greenland, and Mackenzie Bay on
the east coast. I found only a few individuals in the dry bed of a little
rivulet on the ledge above Etah.
Occurrence. S. Foulke Fjord, Etah (1508).
Cochlearia officinalis, L. var. groenlandica, (L.) GELERT.
C. officinalis var. groenlandica, Stmmons, Fl. Ellesm. [C. officina-
lis, Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; C. groenlandica, WetTueriu, List 1894;
C. fenestrata, Duranp, Pl. Kan.; Narsorst, N. W. Gronl.; C. oblongi-
folia, Dicxrz, Not. fl. pl., in IncLerretp, Summer Search].
1 When Duranp, PI. Kan., p. 186, gives the locality where Kane's specimens are
found as “junction of Humboldt and Washington Lands, 8ist N. latitude”, and says
that they were collected in August, he must be mistaken in several respects:
Lat. 81° would be about Cape Bryan at the mouth of Bessels Bay, where no
collections were made; and these regions were never visited in August but only
- in the spring by Morton. Kane himself (Arct. Expl. I, p. 99 and note 24) speaks
of the plant in question as found at the mouth of Mary Minturn River.
1898-1902. No. 16.] FLOW.PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND, 73
The scurvy grass was rather common in Foulke Fjord and somewhat
variable in size and manner of growth, according to the different kinds
of localities where it was found, as was also the case in Ellesmereland:
but all specimens were referable to the above-mentioned variety. As the
case has been the same with all specimens that I have seen from North-
ern Greenland and the northern islands of the American Archipelago,
I do not hesitate to refer to it all records of Cochlearia from our area,
even when the author has used another specific or variety name.
Occurrence. Cape York (WereEriLL); Ivsugigsok (NaTHorsT);
between Cape Atholl and Cape Dudley Digges (Kang); Wolstenholme Sound
(IncLerteLp); Inglefield Gulf: Northumberland Island (Hayes, Arct. boat
journ., p. 93, Stem); Burdin Bay (INGLeFreLp); Sutherland Island at Cape
Alexander (Kane); Foulke Fjord: Reindeer Point and Etah (Hart, Stern,
917, 249); Pikira (Littleton Island), Rensselaer Harbour, Mary Minturn
River (Kane). N. Polaris Bay (Coppice).
Papaveraceae.
Papaver radicatum, Rorts.
P. radicatum, Stumons, Fl. Ellesm.; Ostenrevp, Plantes N. E. Gronl.
[P. radicatum, OstenrELp, FI. pl. Cape York; P. nudicaule, SuUTHER-
LAND, Voyage; Dickie, Not. fl. pl. in INGLEFIELD, Summer Search; Dur-
ano, Pl. Kan. et Enum. pl. Smith S.; Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Nar-
norst, N. W. Gronl.; Brssets, Exp. Pol. Amer. et Amer. Nordpol-Exp.;
Meruan, Contr. Greenl.; WeTHerILt, List 1894; GREELY, Rep.; P. alpi-
num, Harv }. c.].
At Foulke Fjord the poppy was extremely abundant, especially around
the old settlements and in the rookeries. In such places it would form
large tufts having twenty, thirty, or more flowering or fruiting stems.
In other situations the plants would be smaller, but I did not there see
any that might by right be referred to the var. Hartianum, Sma. Prob-
ably, however, this is the variety of which Mrgnan speaks as being
found on Wolstenholme Island and at M’Cormick Bay. Perhaps also
the white-flowered form from the tableland at Ivsugigsok, which Navr-
HoRsT mentions, may belong to this variety. The colour of the petals
varied in the usual manner, the sulphureous being the most common,
but saffron and almost pure whithe flowers were also to be found. Forms
with more or less lacerated petals were also met with.
74 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
The poppy seems to be a very common plant throughout the area,
and is found up to the farthest point where any plants have been
collected.
Occurrence. S. Bushnan Island (Ross, SurHeRLAND); Cape York
(Hart, Stein, WETHERILL); Ivsugigsok (NatTHorsT); Wolstenholme Sound
{INGLEFIELD), Agpa (Saunders Island) and Umanak (Battie), Wolsten-
holme Island (MeeHan), Granville Bay (Mytius Ericusen); Inglefield Gulf:
Northumberland Island (Stein), Burdin Bay (INGLEFiEeLp), Cape Acland,
Fan Glacier, Bowdoin Bay, Glacier Valley at Cape Robertson (WetuHeEr-
iLL), M’Cormick Bay (MeeHan); Cape Alexander (Hayes); Foulke Fjord
(Hart, 200, 1885); Rensselaer Harbour and Mary Minturn River (Kang).
N. Lafayette Bay (Kane); Bessels Bay and Hannah Island (Hart); Hall
Land (Bessets); Polaris Bay (Hart); Lockwood Island (Lockwoop).
Ranunculaceae.
Ranunculus affinis, R. Br.
f. affinis, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm.
This species was never found in North-Western Greenland before
my second visit to Foulke Fjord; but as it was known from the north-
eastern coast and also from one single locality! on the west side (Ar-
salik at N. Isortok Fjord, collected by Kornerup), there was good reason
for keeping a lockout for it. The specimens, of which I got only a few,
are somewhat smaller than those from Ellesmereland, but agree with them.
They were, for the most part, in fruit when collected, August 11, 1899.
Occurrence. S, Foulke Fjord, grassy slopes above Etah (1501),
also in the Sretn collection.
Ranunculus sulphureus, Souanp.
fi. sulphureus, Smmuons, Fl. Ellesm. [R. sulphureus. Natuorst,
N. W. Gronl., R. nivalis, Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp., ex p.; Duran, PI.
Kan., ex p.; BR. frigidus, Dickie, Not. fl. pl., in IncLerretp, Summer
Search].
In all probability, this species is a common plant throughout our
area, where it is found by most collectors since the time of SUTHERLAND
and InGLeriELD. Sometimes, however, it may have been overlooked or
1 T have previously pointed out (FI. Ellesm., p. 107) that Harr has made a mis-
take when he stated this species for Disco.
-
1898— 1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..W. GREENLAND. 75
confounded with &. nivalis, for instance by Hayes who has only the
latter in his list. In Foulke Fjord it grew fairly abundantly both in
grassy slopes and in moister places.
Occurrence. 5S. Ivsugigsok (NarHorst); Wolstenholme Sound
(INGLEFIELD); Smith Sound localities (Kane); Foulke Fjord (Hart), at
Reindeer Point and Etah (204, 1503).
Ranunculus nivalts, L.
R. nivalis, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm. [R. nivalis, Dickie, Not. fl. pl.,
in InGLeFreLD, Summer Search; Duranp, Pl. Kan., ex p.; Hart, Pot. Br.
Pol. Exp., ex p.; Natuorst, N. W. Grénl.; Werueriit, List 1894; R.
niv. var. Freiligrathi, BrssEts, Exp. Pol. Amer.].
This species is stated for many more places than the preceding.
Notwithstanding that I did not myself find it at Foulke Fjord, and that
I am rather inclined to think that several of the records should by
rights be transferred to R. sulphureus or should even include both, [
think it best to enumerate the localities as they are given in the differ-
ent lists, as it is impossible to make sure of the identifications of the
specimens of the american collectors.
BesseEts, in Exp. Pol. Amer., gives a list of the vascular plants found
during the expedition of Haux in the district afterwards called Hall Land.
In this list, stands as the first “Ranunculus nivalis (L.) var. Freili-
grathi (Bessets)”. No description, however, of the variety is given, and
when in his later work (Amer. Nordpol-Exp.) BesseLs gives a new list
of the plants (p. 304), which had meanwhile been examined by Asa GRAY,
he there speaks only of “R. nivalis var.” The name Freiligratht, as
far as I know, has never been validly published and consequently must
be left out of consideration.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (Hart); Ivsugigsok (NatHorst); Wol-
stenholme Sound (IncuerreLp); Northumberland Island (WETHERILL, STEIN);
Smith Sound stations! (Kane); Foulke Fjord (Hart), (at Etah (Mee-
HAN)?)2. N. Lafayette Bay (Kane); Bessels Bay and Hannah Island
(Hart); Hall Land (BesseEts).
1 When Kane speaks of “Ranunculus” without further specification, he may
mean either R. nivalis or R. sulphureus. Such vague statements he has for
Mary Minturn River, Rensselaer Bay, between Capes Atholl and Dudley Digges.
2 Most probably Meruan has here confounded R. nivalis and R. sulphureus, the
latter being common and abundant at Etah.
76 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP.FRAM
Ranunculus Sabinei, R. Br.
R. Sabinei, Smmons, Fl. Ellesm. [R. Sabine affinis, Duranp, PI.
Kan.; Kane, Arct. Expl.].
As I have previously discussed (I. c. p. 111) the description of the
plant in Kane’s collection, which Duranp has, with some doubt, refer-
red to this species, is quite enough to make it certain that his identi-
fication was right. It seems, however, to be a rare plant in North-West-
ern Greenland, as it is not found again in the southern parts which
have been more closely investigated in later years. It may, however,
have been confounded with R. nivalis or R. pygmaeus. The locality
mentioned by Duranp seems also to correspond with those of the species
in Ellesmereland, but not the statement of Kane himself for one of his
localities, where it is said to be found among Sphagnum.
Occurrence. S. Inglefield Gulf: Northumberland and Hakluyt
Islands (Kane); Bedevilled Reach (Kane).
Ranunculus pygmaeus, WAHLENB.
R. pygmaeus, Stumons, FI. Ellesm. [&. pygmaeus, Natuorst, N.
W. Gronl.].
This species, which seems to have been totally overlooked by the
earlier collectors, was first found by Natuorst. In Foulke Fjord it grew
abundantly and luxuniantly in a mossy depression among the rocks tog-
ether with Catabrosa algida, Saxifraga rivularis, and others.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (Stern); Ivsugigsok (NatHorst); Ingle-
field Gulf: Northumberland Island (Stem); Foulke Fjord (1469).
fanunculus hyperhoreus, Rorts.
R. hyperboreus, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm.
Occurrence. S. Inglefield Gulf: Northumberland Island (Srey).
Caryophyllaceae.
Arenaria ciliata, L.
A. ciliata, Simmons, FI. Ellesm. [A. ciliata, Wetueritt, List 1894}.
Occurrence. S. Inglefield Gulf: at Fan Glacier (WETHERILL).
1898—1902. No. 16.) FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W.GREENLAND. 77
. Honkenya peploides, (L.) Enru.
Arenaria peploides, Linnarus, Sp. Plant., 1753; Weruerity, List
1894; Hooker, FI. Bor. Amer.; Macoun, Pl. Pribilof; Honkenya pe-
ploides, Exnruart, Beitr. Naturk. 2; Kruuse, List Angmags.; Lrpe-
pour, Fl. Ross.; Ammadenia peploides, Ruprecat, Fl. Samojed. cisural. ;
Britton & Brown, Ill. Fl.; Halianthus peploides, Fries, Fl. Hall. ;
LANGE, Consp. Fl. Groenl.; Kruuse, List E. Greenl.; Ksetuman, in Vega-
exp.; AnpERSSon & HesseLMAN, Spetsb. karlv.; Kruuse, Jan May.;
Hartman, Skand. Fl.; Grontunp, Isl. FI.
. Fig. J. G. Gmeuin, Fl. Sibir. IV, Tab. 64; Fl. Dan., Tab. 624.
My specimens, which were collected on a sandy beach, where the
plant formed a fairly dense vegetation, approach the var. diffusa,
(Hornem.) Kruuse, in certain respects but differ from it in others.
Hornemann, Dansk Oec. Plantel. I, Ed. 3, p. 501, describes his Arenaria
peploides diffusa as having the stems creeping and more spreading,
than in the main form; with thinner narrower leaves and longer inter-
nodes. My specimens, indeed, have thin, rather narrow leaves, but the
plants are somewhat tufted and the stems are short.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (WetHerILL); Foulke Fjord, outside
Reindeer Point (1525).
Distribution: East and West Greenland, Baffin Land, Arctic
America, Northern Atlantic and Pacific shores of America, Islands of
the Bering Sea, Kamshatka, Eastern and Arctic shores of Siberia, North-
ern and Western Europe, Novaja Semlja, Spitsbergen, Jan Mayen, Fae-
roes, Iceland.
Alsine groenlandica, (Retz.) FEL.
Meenan (Contr. Greenl., p. 209) records a species from M’Cormick
Bay in Inglefield Gulf, which he calls “Arenaria groenlandica, SPRENG.”
Tu. Houm (Contr. Fl. Greenl.), indeed, who has corrected a great many
errors in Meswan’s paper, and especially in his identifications of the
species, has not mentioned anything about the plant here in question ;
but this may be accounted for by the fact that he has not seen the
whole collection of MeeHan, and so has been unable to control him in
every case. At all events, I do not feel justified in entering Alsine
groenlandica in the list of the North-Western Greenland flora without
better authority, as the species so far as known, is not at all high-arc-
tic. Its principal area of distribution is in the Eastern States of America,
from the higher parts of the Alleghanies in North Carolina and Virginia,
78 H. G. SIMMONS. |SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
northwards to Labrador. Further, it is found in a number of places in
Greenland, on the east coast only at Ikerasarsuk in the far south, and
on the west coast principally in the southern districts as far as to about
644/,° N. (Baals Revier, leg. Vani). Further north it is recorded from
three stations, Sukkertoppen (about 651/,°, leg. Kang), Egedesminde (about
681/.°, leg. Sorensen) and Upernivik (about 73°, leg. Kane).
The statements of Duranp about Kanr’s plant are, as previously
pointed out by several authors, and as I myself have had an opport-
unity of showing, not to be trusted overmuch; and so we get, even
reckoning from Egedesminde, an extension of about 9° northward of the
area of the species. In the Arctic Archipelago A. groenlandica is not
found; Harvr’s statement of it for Northern Ellesmereland is a mistake,
as I have ascertained at Kew (Simmons, Fl. Ellesm., p. 117), and the
same is almost certainly the case with Greety’s plant under the same
name (Rep. II, p. 18).
It is rather difficult to form any opinion, as to what MegHan’s plant
really is, perhaps Alsine verna, (L.) WaHLens., as this common species
is lacking in his list.
Alsine verna, (L.) WAHLENB.
A. verna, Simmons, F], Ellesm.; [.4. verna. OsTenretp, FI. pl. Cape
York; A. rubella, Duranp, Enum. pl. Smith S.; Natuorst, N. W.
Groénl.; Arenaria verna, Werneritt, List 1894; 4. rubella, Hart, Bot.
Br. Pol. Exp.].
This is doubtless a common species, even though not collected in
all the places visited by the different expeditions or by all collectors.
Generally my specimens represent the variety rubella (WAHLENB.), as is
the case also in Ellesmereland. The Arenaria arctica in the list of
Hayes (Op. Pol. Sea), doubtless belongs here, as Duranp has instead of
it the name A. rubella var. hirta, Vauu.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NatHorst); Wolstenholme Sound:
Umanak and Saunders Island (Batter); Inglefield Gulf: Netlik (Hayes),
Fan Glacier (WeruerILL): Foulke Fjord (Harr), at Reindeer Point (243,
1495).
Cerastium alpinum, L.
C. alpinum, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm.; Osrenreto, Plantes N. E. Grénl.
[C. alpinum, SuTHertanp, Voyage; Dickie, Not. fl. pl., in INGLEFIELD,
Summer Search; Duranp, Pl. Kan. et Enum. pl. Smith S. (incl. var.);
Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Bessets, Amer. Nordpol-Exp.; Natuorst, N.
1898—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND, 79
W. Gronl.; Meeuan, Contr. Greenl.; Werneritt, List 1894: GREELY,
Rep.; Ostenretp, Fl. pl. Cape York; C. vulgatwm, Besses, Exp. Pol.
Amer.]
This common arctic plant has been brought home from, or at least
observed at, almost every place visited. My specimens, collected in the
rich soil of the old Eskimo village of Etah, represent a big, rather
hairy form, probably the same as the var. Fischerianum in Duranp,
Enum. pl. Smith S.
Occurrence. S. Bushnan Island (SurHeRLaND); Cape York (Hart,
WETHERILL, STEIN); between that point and Cape Dudley Digges (Kang);
Ivsugigsok (NatHorst), between Cape Dudley Digges and Cape Atholl
(Kane); Wolstenholme Sound (MeeHan), at Umanak and Saunders Is-
land (Bate); Inglefield Gulf: Burdin Bay (IncLerretp), Netiulumi (WetTH-
ERILL), Glacier Valley, Cape Acland, Fan Glacier (WeTHERILL); Carey
Islands (WeTHERILL); Port Foulke (Hayes); Foulke Fjord (Harr), at
Etah (Sten, 250, 1462); Rensselaer Bay (Kane); Mary Minturn River
(Kang). N. Lafayette Bay (Kane); Bessels Bay, Hannah Island, Cape
Morton (Hart); Hall Land (Bessets); Polaris Bay (Hart); Lockwood
Island (Lockwoop). —
Stellaria humifusa, Rotts.
S. humifusa, Smumons, FI. Ellesm. [S. humifusa, Duranp, Enum.
pl. Smith S.; Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Naruorst, N. W. Grénl.; Wetu-
ERILL, List 1894).
Notwithstanding the fact that Hart records this species from Foulke
Fjord, I did not find it there. I should think it very probable, how-
ever, that it grows in the innermost part of the fjord, in front of the
Brother John’s Glacier, which I could not reach during our short stay. Ac-
cording to Tu. Hot (Contr. FI. Greenl.) the S. longipes var. Edwardsii of
Meenan (Contr. Greenl.), should be the present species. I dare not,
however, refer the locality Verhoeff Nunatak here, as it would be quite
contrary to the nature of S. humifusa to grow in such a_ locality.
Mseuan has probably confounded the two species, and the specimen
seen by Hotm, has been collected in a place not recorded in MegHan’s
list — perhaps in Danish Greenland.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NaTHorst); Wolstenholme Sound:
Dalrymple Island (WeTHERIL); -Inglefield Gulf: Northumberland Island
(Sremn), Netlik (Hayes); Foulke Fjord (Hart).
80 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT, EXP. FRAM
Stellaria longipes, GOLDIE.
S. longipes, Simmons, F]. Ellesm.; Ostenreip, Plantes N. E. Grénl.
[S. longipes, Dickie, Not. fl. pl., in INcLerieLp, Summer Search; Duranp,
Pl. Kan. (incl. varr.); Natnorst, N. W. Gronl.; Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.;
Werueriit, List 1894; Osrenrexp, FI. pl. Cape York; S. stricta, Dur-
anp, Enum. pl. Smith S.].
In Foulke Fjord, where the plant was very common, I found the
var. humilis, Fenzi, the same in which it generally appears in Elles-
mereland, as well as another, less condensed, and glaucous form, which
comes nearest to var. peduncularis, (Bunce) Fenzu (St. peduncularis,
Bunce, in Lepezour, Fl. Alt.). The first-mentioned form grew in open
soil, gravelly places, etc., the latter among grass along brooks in the
slope above Etah (1499).
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (Natuorst); Wolstenholme Sound
(INGLEFIELD); Granville Bay (Mytius Ericusen); Inglefield Gulf: Burdin
Bay (Incterietp), Northumberland Island (WETHERILL, Stern), Netiulumi,
Fan Glacier, (WeTHERILL), Verhoeff Nunatak (MEEHAN, compare above
under S. humifusa), Netlik (Hayes); Foulke Fjord (Hart), at Reindeer
Point and Etah (Srem, 211, 1499); Bedevilled Reach and Rensselaer
Bay (Kane).
Melandrium affine, J. Van.
M. affine, Smmons, F. Ellesm.; M. involucratum 6 affine, OstTeN-
FELD, Plantes N. EK. Gronl. [M. affine, Ostenretp, Fl. pl. Cape York;
Lychnis affinis, Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Wahlbergella affinis, Nat-
Horst, N. W. Gronl.].
In Foulke Fjord I found only one single individual of this species,
the following, which was not found in Ellesmereland, being here the
most abundant. Kane did not bring home either of them, only M.
apetalum; but some of his notes about ‘“Lychnis”, for instance, at the
mouth of Mary Minturn River in Bancroft Bay, and from the shore of
Kennedy Channel, belong most probably here. The “Lychnis pauci-
flora” of Hayes! of which I can form no distinct opinion as the speci-
1 Indeed Duranv, Enum. pl. Smith S., records a “Lychnis pauciflora, Fiscu.” from
Netlik, but as he has also besides L. apetala, he does not use the name inthe same
sense as Fiscuer himself (L. pauciflora, Fiscu. in litt. is a synonym of L. ape-
tala, according to Decanpotts, Prodr. I, p. 386). According to Romrpacs, Syn.
Lychn., the author of L. pauciflora is LepEsour, even though the specimens in
the herbarium of Fiscuer are referred to under Melandrium apetalum. Lepe-
zour himself, in his Fl. Ross. has his L. pauciflora as a synonym of the latter
1898 — 1902. No. 16.| FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..W. GREENLAND. 81
mens are not accessible, belongs more probably to M. triflorum, but
later collectors also have found M. affine. It seems, however, to be
much rarer here than to the west.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NatHorst); Wolstenholme Sound:
Umanak and Saunders Island (Bate); Inglefield Gulf: Northumberland
Island (Stern); Foulke Fjord (Hart, 4272). N. Polaris Bay (Hart).
Melandrium trifforum, (R. Br.) Vaut.
Lychnis triflora, Ros. Brown, List of pl., 1819 (nomen solum);
WETHERILL, List 1894; L. affinis var. triflora, Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.;
Wahlbergella triflora, Fries, Sum. Veg. Scand.; Srumons, Prel. Rep. et
Bot. Arb.; Natuorst, N. W. Groénl.; Melandrium triflorwm, Vauu, in
Lresmann, FI. Dan.; Ronrpacu, Syn. Lychn.; Lance, Consp. FI. Groenl.;
Hartz, Fan. o. Karkr.; Kruuse, List E. Green.
Fig. Fl. Dan., T. 2356.
This species seems to be at least as common as the former, and
occurs in greater abundance at the points where il is found, at all events
by Narsorst and myself. In the rich soil of the old village of Etah,
as well as in the slopes where the little auks had their nests, luxuriant
specimens were found in abundance.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NaTuorst); Inglefield Gulf: Netiu-
umi (Werueri1), Northumberland Island (Stein), Bowdoin Bay (WeTH-
ERILL); Foulke Fjord (Hart), at Etah (Stern, 214, 1470). Not yet rec-
orded from the region north of the Humboldt Glacier, where it must,
however, most probably grow, to judge from the distribution.
Distribution: Northern East and West Greenland. This is one
of the very few endemic species of Greenland. It is indeed recorded
also for Northern Ellesmereland, but almost certainly by mistake as J
have previously pointed out (Fl. Ellesm., p. 126).
Melandrium apetalum, (L.) Fenzu.
M. apetalum, Siumoys, FI. Ellesm. [Lychnis apetala, Dickiz, Not.
fl. pl., in INGLEFIELD, Summer Search: Duranp, Enum. pl. Smith S.;
species. Duranp, who has both in his list of Hayes’ plants, must have made
some mistake, and has probably used the name “pauciflora” either for M. affine
‘or M. triflorum. In his PI. Kan. also, Duranp, has both L. apetala and L.
pauciflora, the latter recorded for “Bedevilled Reach and other stations of
Smith Sound”. 6
82 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Bessers, Exp. Pol. Amer. et Amer. Nordpol-
Exp.; WeTHERILL, List 1894}.
Occurrence. S. Wolstenholme Sound (IncLEFIELpD); Inglefield Gulf:1
Burdin Bay (Incerretp), Netlik (Hayes), Fan Glacier and Cape Acland
(WeTHERILL); Foulke Fjord (Hart), at Reindeer Point (1494, 1524, 1583).2
N. Hall Land (Bessets).
Silene acaulis, L.
S. acaulis, Simmons, FI. Ellesm. [S. acaulis, Duranp, Pl. Kan.,
et Enum. pl. Smith S.; Natuorst, N. W. Grénl.; WeTHERILL, List 1894].
Notwithstanding that this species is not at all rare at Foulke Fjord,
it has been entirely overlooked there by the previous collectors. I found
it in several places—in grassy slopes as well as in gravel plains. Nar-
norst, N. W. Gronl., records it only for Ivsugigsok; but although it is
not noted by Duranp from any of Kane’s North-West Greenland local-
ities, it is mentioned by Kane himself (Arct. Explor. I, p. 266), and it
is also entered in the list of Hayes’s collections.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (WetHERILL); Ivsugigsok (NatHorst);
Inglefield Gulf: Northumberland Island (Stem), Glacier Valley, Cape
Acland, Fan Glacier (WeTHERILL), Netlik (Hayes); Foulke Fjord, Rein-
deer Point (223, 1520); Rensselaer Bay (Kane).
Portulacaceae.
Montia lamprosperma, CHAM.
M. lamprosperma, Cuamisso, Pl. Romanzoff., 1831; M. fontana,
Linnaeus, Sp. Plant., Ed. I, ex p.; Wernermty, List 1894; Brirron &
Browy, Ill. Fl.; Lepesour, Fl. Ross., ex p.; Biryrr, M. N., Norg. Fl,
ex p.; M. fontana *lamprosperma, Linppere, Finl. Montiaf.; M. rivu-
laris, Lance, Consp. Fl. Groenl.; Grontunp, Isl. Fl.; Ostenretp, Phan.
Faer.; M. riv. *lamprosperma, Neuman & AHLFVENGREN, Sv. Fl.; M. riv.
f. lamprosperma, Buytr, A., Norg. Fl.
Fig. Cuamisso, |. ¢., T. 7, fig. 2.
1 Mzrnan, who mentions it from Inglefield Gulf (Contr. Greenl., p. 209), seems to
have been unable to separate the species in question as pointed out by Tu.
_ Houm, Contr. Fl. Green).
> The statement of Duranp, Pl. Kan., “at almost every station of both voyages“,
must of course be left out of consideration.
1898—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 83
Here, as in a good many other cases, the descriptions of species
given by CHamisso and ScHLEcHTENDAL have been overlooked or un-
justly put aside; and it is only recently that they have again been taken
into consideration. This is done for Montia by H. Linpperg, 1. c., who
has pointed out that the M. fontana of Linnarus is not uniform: even
though the differences between its constituents are not greater than to
allow of their being placed as subspecies under it. The two species of
Gueuin, Fl. Bad. M. minor and M. rivularis are, however, too nearly
connected to be held apart. Both are of southerly distribution, and
LinpBeRG places them together as subsp. minor under M. fontana, with
a variety rivularis comprising the form from running water. From —
M. fontana *minor, with its strongly tuberculate seeds, the other subsp.
lamprosperma, (CHam.) Linps. fil., is well distinguished by its smooth,
glossy seeds. A similar division is already made by Fenzx in Lepesovr,
FI. Ross. II, p. 152, even if the two plants are here designed as a chon-
drosperma and 8 lamprosperma. Fernzu also says there that both
show the same variations in mode of growth and in the shape of the
leaves; but besides this he speaks of forms intermediate between the
varieties. Already Cuamisso speaks of his new species as especially
arctic and alpine; its distribution is, however, not easy to give without
an inspection of a considerable quantity of material, as most of the flo-
ras use collective names. The Western Greenland plant, however, ‘is
always M. lamprosperma, which alone seems to enter the arctic region,
and therefore may as well keep the rank its author has given it. I must
take it for granted, that Werueritt’s plant is identical with that of the
southern coast.
Occurrence. S. Inglefield Gulf: Cape Acland (WerHERILL).
Distribution: Danish West Greenland, Arctic America (?, compare
Britton & Brown, l.c.), Alaska, Unalaschka, California (?), Andes of
South America, Eastern Siberia (?), Northern Europe, Faeroes, Iceland.
M. minor is distributed in Europe from the southernmost part of Scan-
dinavia southwards, and it probably has a corresponding distribution in
Asia and perhaps in America.
Polygonaceae.
Polygonum viviparam, L.
P. viviparwm, Smwons, FI. Ellesm.; OstTenreip, Plantes N. E.
Grénl. [P. viviparum, Dickie, Not. fl. pl., in INGLEFIELD, Summer Search;
84 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Duranp, Pl. Kan. et Enum. pl. Smith S.; Bessets, Exp. Pol. Amer. et
Amer. Nordpol-Exp.; Natuorst, N. W. Gronl.; Weruerit, List 1894;
OstTeNFELD, FI. pl. Cape York].
Certainly common all over the area, even though it is noted only
by Bessets from the northern part. Kane and Hayes, according to
Duranp, have found it “in every station” and, for my own part, I found
it abundantly in Foulke Fjord, in all grassy ledges, slopes and plateaus,
etc. I will, however, enumerate the special localities reported in lite-
rature.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NatHorst); Wolstenholme Sound
(INGLEFIELD), Agpa (Saunders Island) and Umanak (Bate); Inglefield
Gulf: Northumberland Island (Stery), Cape Acland (WETHERILL); Foulke
Fjord at Reindeer Point and Etah (Srey, 1463, 1519). N. Hall Land
(BEssELs).
Oxyria digyna, (L.) Hitt.
O. digyna, Simmons, FI. Ellesm.; Ostenretp, Plantes N. E. Grénl.
[O. digyna, Duranp, PI. Kan. et Enum. pl. Smith S.; Bessexs, Exp.
Pol. Amer. et Amer. Nordpol-Exp.; Natuorst, N. W. Groénl.; WerHerit,
List 1894; O. reniformis, Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.].
Occurrence. 8S. Between Cape York (Hart) and Cape Dudley
Digges (Kane); Ivsugigsok (NatHorst); [nglefield Gulf: Netiulumi (Weru-
ERILL), Burdin Bay (INGLEFIELD), Northumberland Island (Hayes, ! WeTH-
ERILL, Kane, Stern), Netlik (Hayes), Glacier Valley, Cape Acland, Fan
Glacier (WeETHERILL); Foulke Fjord (Haves, Hart), at Etah (Sremn, 224,
1523); Rensselaer Bay and Mary Minturn River (Kang). N. Lafayette Bay
(Kanz); Bessels Bay Hannah Island, Cape Morton (Hart); Hall Land
(Bessets), Polaris Bay (Hart).
Betulaceae.
Betula nana, L.
B. nana, Linnagus, Sp. Plant., 1753; Lance, Consp. Fl. Groenl.;
Kruuse, List E. Greenl. et List Angmags.; Hayss, Op. Pol. Sea; Dur-
and, Enum. pl. Smith S.; Naruorsr, Nachtr.; Werueritt, List 1894;
Hooker, Fl. Bor. Amer., ex p-; Brirton & Brown, Ill. Fl.; Houm, Nov.
Zeml. Veg.; ANDERsson & HEssELMAN, Spetsb. karlv.; Lepegour, Fl. Ross.,
ex p.; Harrman, Skand. FI.; Gronunp, Isl. FI.
1 Arct. boat journ., p. 93.
1898—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..W.GREENLAND. 85
Fig. Sv. Bot. T. 379; Fl. Dan., T. 91.
Nartuorst (N. W. Gronl.), at first excluded this species from the list,
notwithstanding the statements about it in the works of Hayes and Dur-
AnD; but afterwards he inserted it, as he found ‘birches” mentioned,
also by Kane (I Grinnell Exp., p. 143). Now indeed both these evid-
ences are of somewhat doubtful value, but later on it has been recorded
from our district by WeTHERILL also, and is consequently to be recko-
ned as a citizen of the area.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (WeTHERILL); between that point and
Cape Dudley Digges (Kane); Port Foulke (Hayes).
Distribution: East and West Greenland, Labrador, Hudson Bay
region, ! Novaja Semlja, Spitsbergen, Russia, Scandinavia, Prussia, moun-
tains of Middle Europe, Scotland, Iceland.
Salicaceae.
Salix arctica, PA...
S. arctica, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm.; Ostenreip, Plantes N. E. Grénl.
Under this name I feel myself fully justified in uniting all the
Salices, reported from Greenland north of Melville Bay, with the sole
exception of S. herbacea. INGLEFIELD, SUTHERLAND, Kane, Hayes, Dur-
AND, Bessets, Hart, and Natuorst have used the name “arctica” with
either Brown or Pattas as author. “S. Brownii’” is mentioned by
Werueri.., “S. glauca” by Kane and Werueriut, “S. lanata” by
Kang, “S. uva ursi” by Kane. Even without having seen the speci-
mens thus determined, I cannot doubt that they all belong to the multi-
form S. arctica. For particulars about the different forms and their
synonymic, I must refer to my FI. Ellesm., p. 180—182, and to the lite-
rature quoted there, especially LunpstR6m, Weid. Nov. Seml.; here, it
may be enough to point out that S. wva ursi, PuRsH, is a species of
far a more southerly distribution, found nowhere in Greenland. The same
is the case with S. lanata, L. (with the exception of some indetermin-
able, sterile specimens in the Copenhagen herbarium, conf. Lance, Consp.
1 Several authors, indeed, for instance Hooker (I. c.) and J. D. Hooker, Outl. of
Distrib, have given it a far wider range in America; but, in the northwest at
least, B. glandulosa, Micux., has certainly been taken for it by the earlier
botanists, who have reported B. nana, which has also been the case in several
parts of Asia. Therefore even the statements about its distribution in LeprBour,
l.c., are not to be indiscriminately used, even though it is not improbable, that
the present species is spread also in Asia.
86 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP, FRAM
Fl. Groenl., p. 111). Even Duranp, Pl. Kan., discards the latter name
as well as S. glauca. S. Brownii, Lunpsrr. (and Bess ?), is only a var-
iety of S. arctica—in fact the most common in these regions (S. arc-
tica, R. Brown). The more hairy lanata- and glauca-like forms belong
presumably to the var. groenlandica, Anperss., which is reported by
OstEeNnFELD, Flow. pl. Cape York. This seems to be far more rare here
than to the south.
It may indeed seem rather rash to criticize the identifications of the
different collectors and authors without examining their specimens, but
still I think it is best to arrange all the statements under S. arctica,
the more so, as none of the authors, who possess a more thorough
knowledge of the arctic, and especially of the Greenland flora—viz.
Lance, Naruorst, and OstenreLp—have been able to discern any other
species in the North-West Greenland material which they have examined.
There are, however, two statements in Mr. Hozm’s list of the Stem
plants, which have given me some trouble. He has identified one speci-
men from Etah with S. groenlandica, (Anperss.) Lunpsrr., and another
from Northumberland Island with S. glauca. Now Mr. Hoim has had
good opportunities of studying the Salices in question, both in Green-
land and in Novaja Semlja, but I think that he has formed a different
opinion about them from that at which I have arrived, for he probably
uses the name “S. arctica’ only for the original plant of Pattas such
as he knows it from Novaja Semlja. He has, therefore, not used it at
all for any specimen in the Sremn collection. As he has not identified
any as the most common form, var. Brownii, I must—even if I cannot
do so without hesitation—conclude that his S. groenlandica is what
I identify with var. Brownii and his S. glauca belongs to the most
glauca-like variety, viz. var. groenlandica. For my part, I have seen
no groenlandica at Etah, although I can assert that I have looked pretty
thoroughly over the neighbourhood of the old village during my two
excursions there. At Foulke Fjord S. arctica was equally common
a plant in different localities, as it was in Ellesmereland, and the state-
ments in literature seem to indicate that the same holds true all over
North-West Greenland.
Occurrence. S. Bushnan Island (SurHeRLann) ; Cape York (Hart,
Weruerni); between there and Cape Dudley Digges (Kang); Ivsu-
gigsok (NatHorst);1 Wolstenholme Sound (IneLeFieLp), Agpa (Saun-
1 Probably, at least partly, var. groenlandica.
1898-1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..W.GREENLAND. 87
ders Island) and Umanak (Bate);! Carey Islands: Bjérling Island (Wern-
ERILL); Inglefield Gulf: Burdin Bay ({neierietp); Netlik (Haves); Netiu-
lumi (WeTHERILL), Northumberland Island (Srey), Fan Glacier,2 Cape
Acland, Glacier Valley, Bowdoin Bay (Werueritt); Foulke Fjord (Hayes,
Hart, Srein, 209, 1507); Rensselaer Bay, Butler Island (Kang). N. Along
the coast of the Kennedy Channel (Morton according to Kang); Bes-
sels Bay, Cape Morton, Hannah Island (Hart); Hall Land (Bessets),
Polaris Bay (Hart); Wood Point (Beaumont according to Hart).
Salix glauca, L.
This species was first reported by Kane, but Duranp has excluded
it from the list in Pl. Kan. It has been recorded later by WeTHERILL,
whose statements I have, however, thought best to refer to S. arctica,
as may be seen above; and lastly there is the statement from North-
umberland Island in Mr. Houm’s list of the Stein plants. Of course it
cannot be denied, that S. glauca, a common plant throughout Danish
Greenland, might very well have found its way to the north-western
parts of the country; but still, I think it safer not to give it a place in
the list as an indisputable citizen of the region as long as I have not
myself seen specimens, especially as I have, as already stated, good
reason to think that Mr. Hotm’s opinion about the different members of
the form-series of S. arctica is not the same as mine.
Salix herbacea, L.
S. herbacea, Linnazus, Sp. Plant., 1753; Lance, Consp. FI. Groenl.;
Kruusg, List E. Greenl. et List Angmags.; Natuorst, *N. W. Gronl.;
Duranp, Pl. Kan. et Enum. pl. Smith S.; Hooxer, F]. Bor. Amer.; Brit-
ton & Brown, Ill. Fl.; Lepesour, FI. Ross.; Hartman, Skand. Fl.; Osren-
FELD, Phan. Faer.; Grontunp, Isl. Fl.; Kruuse, Jan May.
Fig. Linnagus, Fl. Lapp., T. 7, f. 3, 4; Sv. Bot., T. 367; Fl. Dan.,
T. 117.
Kane was the first to report this species from North-Western Green-
land (I Grinnell Exp. I, p. 143), but as he seems not to have collected
it from the single locality whence he mentions it, it did not come into
Duranp’s list in Pl. Kan.; or he may have mistaken small individuals
of S. arctica for it, as may easily be done (cf. Simmons, Fl. Ellesm.,
1 F. typica and var. Brownii.
2 Var. groenlandica.
88 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
p. 131). The species does, however, grow there, as is shown by the
specimens brought home by Naruorst and others, and therefore I deem
it best to enumerate the localities from whence it is reported, even though
I must take exception against eventual mistakes.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NaTHorst); between Cape York and
Cape Dudley Digges (Kane); Inglefield Gulf: Northumberland Island
(Stem); Foulke Fjord: Port Foulke (Hayes).
Distribution: East and West Greenland, Arctic American Archi-
pelago, Arctic America, Labrador, Canada, down to the mountains of
Maine and New Hampshire, (Western America?), (Arctic Siberia?),!
Altai and other mountains, Arctic Russia, Northern Scandinavia, the
Alps and other European mountains, mountains of Great Britain,
Faeroes, Iceland, Jan Mayen.
Liliaceae.
Tofieldia palustris, Huns.
T. palustris, Hupson, Fl. Angl., Ed. If, 1778; Kruuss, List E.
Greenl.; Duranp, Enum. pl. Smith S.; Werneriwy, List 1894; Hooker,
Fl. Bor. Amer.; Brirron & Brown, Ill. Fl.; Lepepour, FI. Ross.; An-
persson & HesseLman, Spetsb. karlv.; 7. borealis, Wauvensere, FI.
Lapp.; Lance, Consp. FI. Groenl.; Kruusz, List Angmags.; Hartman,
Skand. Fl.; Groyzunp, Isl. Fl.; Anthericum calyculatum, Linnaeus, Sp.
Plant., ex p., et A. calyc. 8, Fl. Suec., Ed. II.
Fig. Linnarus, Fl. Lapp., T. 10, fig. 8; Sv. Bot. T. 482, fig. 1;.
Fl. Dan., T. 36.
Durann, |. c., p. 95, reports this plant for Port Foulke, but it is
omitted in Hayes’s own list (Op. Pol. Sea) of his collection; NatHorst
consequently had a good reason for excluding it from his list in N. W.
Grénl., where he says, however, that it might presumably be thought
that it grew there. As it is found later in Inglefield Gulf, it belongs
at all events to the flora of our area, and there is hardly any reason
for excluding the locality of Duranp, if the statements—always doubt-
ful—from the first american expeditions are to be used at all. More-
over, T. palustris is not only a common plant in Danish West Green-
land, but is also spread far northwards on the eastern coast.
1 Some of the older records are doubtful and ought probably to be transferred
to S. polaris, Wan.ens.
1898— 1902. No. 16] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 89
Occurrence. S. Inglefield Gulf: Cape Acland (WerTuHeritt); Port
Foulke (Hayes according to Duranp).
Distribution: East and West Greenland, Arctic American Archi-
pelago, Arctic America, Labrador, Canada, Rocky Mountains, Alaska,
Ural, Arctic Russia, Spitsbergen, Northern Scandinavia, Bavaria, Scot-
land, Iceland.
Juncaceae.
Juncus biglumis, L.
J. biglumis, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm. [J. bigluimis, Bessets, Exp. Pol.
Amer. et Amer. Nordpol-Exp.; Natuorst, N. W. Grénl.].
Curiously enough, this plant has escaped most collectors, although
it can hardly be rare. Only Bessets, besides NaTHorsr and myself,
has it in his list. In Foulke Fjord I saw it in several places; in swamps,
along brooks, etc. as in Ellesmereland.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NatHorst); Inglefield Gulf: Burdin
Bay (Sten); Foulke Fjord, at Etah and elsewhere (1480, 1517). N. Hall
Land (BEssELs).
Luzula arcuata, (Wan.ens.) Sw. var. confusa, (LinpEB.) KJELL.
L. arcuata var. confusa, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm.; Ostenretp, Plantes
N. E. Gronl.
In the case of the Luzulae it is more than usually difficult to make
any arrangement of the statements of the different authors, who have
more or less confounded two or more species. As shown by my previ-
ous revision (I. c., p. 1833—136), first there is the L. hyperborea of Ros.
Brown, including two different and well-defined species; further the
question about the range of L. arcuata, and so on. Moreover, several
authors have believed that they had L. campestris, (L.) DC., also in
their material. For my own part, I cannot doubt, that most of the records
are referable to L. arcuata var. confusa, which is certainly the most
common form here as in Ellesmereland; L. nivalis is undoubtedly a
very much rarer plant. My reasons for this opinion are, partly the com-
parison of my own observations at Foulke Fjord with my knowledge
of the appearance of the two species on the other side of Smith Sound,
partly the inferences that can be drawn from the descriptions and no-
tices given in some of the papers, concerning the N. W. Greenland flora.
I therefore feel justified in referring all records that do not decidedly
90 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
point to ZL. nivalis, to the above-mentioned species. It will, however,
be requisite to treat every author separately, beginning with the first
report.
SUTHERLAND, Voyage, enumerates L. hyperborea. As I have not
seen any specimen, I think it best to refer it to the species here in
question, as Natuorst, N. W. Grénl., has already done.
Dickie, Not. fl. pl., in InGLEFreELD, Summer Search, enumerates L.
campestris var. congesta. Now first of all, that species is absent from
the whole of Greenland, and most probably from the entire arctic region,
as is also the variety. There does indeed exist a corresponding variety
of L. multiflora, (Euru.) Les., but that also, as well as the main species,
is lacking in our area. As the name is generally used for the present
species, I refer his localities to it.
Duranp, Pl. Kan., has both LZ. hyperborea and L. arcuata in his
list; his descriptions clearly show that he has had the present variety
as well as L. nivalis (hyperborea) before him. In Hayes’s collection,
he has perhaps had only the former represented. The plant which is
here called L. campestris var. congesta, must however, be left out of the
list as it is noted for ‘“Tessiussak, Sept. 4”, and was perhaps collected
in Danish Greenland.
Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp., has “Z. campestris (var. congesta)”’, “L.
multiflora” and “L. arcuata (L. hyperborea)’. I have seen his speci-
mens in the London collections and can therefore assert, that the former
name signifies the species here in question as I have already stated
(l. c., p. 133). The locality Polaris Bay is consequently to be referred to
I. arcuata var. confusa, and the border-line of L. multiflora must
accordingly be drawn a long way south of 81° 40’, where Lance has
been induced to draw it, by relying on the statement of Harr. Even
GeLert (in Ostenretp, FI. Arct., p. 31) gives it the same range. If his
“I!” after the indication “West Greenl. 60°—81° 40’” is to signify that he
has seen Hart’s specimens, I cannot agree with him in his identifica-
tion. The ZL. arcuata of Hart includes also DL. nivalis, as I have found
in examining his specimens, that is to say it is identical with Brown's
L. hyperborea.
Natuorst, |. c., has L. arcuata var. confusa from [vsugigsok under
the right name, but among his specimens of Luzula some of L. nivalis
are also to be found. Naruorst, l. c., p. 28, speaks of these as similar
to L. arctica, but has referred them to the other species on the au-
thority of Ksettman. In the Stockholm herbarium the name was altered
1898— 1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..W. GREENLAND. 91
by N.H. Nitsson-Ente to L. arctica, Bu., and I am entirely in accord
with him in transferring the plants to the following species.
In Wertueritt, List 1894, several localities are enumerated for L.
arcuata, which must doubtless go to the present species.
Mr. Tu. Hotm, in his list of the Stern collection, enumerates two
localities for L. multiflora var. congesta, which I feel justified in trans-
ferring to the species here in question.
At Foulke Fjord, ZL. arcuata var. confusa is, according to my own
observations, a common plant in different localities. In my collection
I have also the f. subspicata, Lance.
It may perhaps seem as if I had taken to great liberties with the
statements of the different authors, in referring so many of the plants
to this species, and especially by not including L. multiflora in the list;
but I think that I am justified by the following facts: I have seen no
other species from the area except L.arcuata var. confusa and L. ni-
_ walis, and Naruorst has made the same arrangement (for L. spicata see
below!); several of the authors whom I have criticized have, in many
instances, shown that their identifications are not to be implicitly relied
upon; and lastly L. multiflora is nowhere high-arctic, since the wrong
statements of Harr are excluded. Indeed, Lance gives it a range all
over Danish Greenland, but as he mentions no special localities, it can-
not be seen where its limit really is; and there are some facts which
make a limit within the borderline of Danish Greenland rather probable.
L. multiflora does not go north of Scoresby Sound (70°) on the east
coast, and the variety congesta, which alone is reported from N. W.
Greenland has, according to Lance, a decidedly southern distribution
in Danish Greenland, where it is not found north of Ritenbenk about
70° in the Disco region. Perhaps the main form also hat its limit
thereabouts.
There is still a Luzgula-form left about which a notice must be given.
Naruorst, l.¢., has given a description of a plant which he calls L. spe-
cata var. Kjellmani. He mentions that at first he took it for a small
form of L.arcuata var. confusa, but afterwards KyeLLMan induced him
to transfer it to L. spicata. In examining his specimens in the Stock-
holm herbarium, I soon found that the stunted state of the plant was
owing to infection by a parasitic fungus which had infested every flower.
At my request, Mr. T. WesTerGren of Stockholm, the well-known my-
cologist, kindly undertook to determine the parasite, and he has since
informed me that it was Ustilago hyperborea, Buyrt, a fungus known
previously only from Norway. Mr. WESTERGREN found it afterwards
92 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP, FRAM
also in the flowers of another dwarf-form of Luzula arcuata collected
in Torne Lappmark by Hicerstrém. Var. Kjellmani thus is shown
to be merely a pathological deformation and the name must be with-
drawn. Moreover, the plant in question belongs not to L. spicata but
to L arcuata. The former species must, consequently, be excluded from
the flora of the area.
Occurrence. S. Bushnan Island (SuTHERLAND); Ivsugigsok (Nar-
Horst); Wolstenholme Sound (Ineterietp); Inglefield Gulf: Burdin Bay:
(IncLeFtELD), Northumberland Island (Stet); Glacier Valley at Robertson
Bay, Fan Glacier (WeTHERILL); Foulke Fjord (Hart), at Etah (Stem) and
other places (237, 1481, 4254); Fog Inlet (Kang). N. Polaris Bay (Hart)
Luzula nivalis, (Larst.) BEURL.
L. nivalis, Simmons, FI. Ellesm.; Ostenretp, Plantes N. E. Gronl.
As in Ellesmereland, this species seems to be a rather rare and
sporadic one in North-Western Greenland from whence it is only men-
tioned by Duranp, Pl. Kan. It may, however, have been found in Foulke
Fjord by Hart, even though I have seen no specimens to prove it, and
Naruorst, as previously mentioned, has also brought it home.
Occurrence. S,. Ivsugigsok (NaTHoRST); Foulke Fjord (1514, 1895);
Bedevilled Reach (Kang).
Luzula spicata, (L.) DC.
As mentioned above, the plant of Natuorst referred to this spe-
cies, really belongs to L. arcuata, but still [ cannot unreservedly deny
the possibility that L. spicata may grow in our area. In the Kew her-
barium I saw a specimen, collected at Whale Sound, Aug. 25, 1852,
which I have noted as collected by Taytor! and belonging to L. spi-
cata. It was called L. campestris congesta, but I have noted that the
long, pointed sepals and the hairiness at the mouth of the leaf-sheaths,
place it under spicata. Not having the specimen at hand for another
examination, | am now very doubtful about it. It might be the same
deformed L. arcuata as the plant of Natuorst, the real nature of which
I first found out in 1906, two years after my visit to London; or it may
also be supposed, that Taytor, whose collections were made in different
places—among them Danish Greenland and Baffin Land where L. spi-
1 I know nothing, however, about Taytor having visited these regions, as no plants
from there are included in his Fl. pl. Baffin B.
1898—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 93
cata grows—has perhaps confounded some of them. At all events, |
dare not, without other evidence than this single specimen, give the
species a place in the list of the North-Western Greenland flora.
°
Cyperaceae.
Carex misandra, R. Br.
C. misandra, Simmons, FI. Ellesm. [C. misandra, Natuorst, N.
W. Gronl.; Werueritt, List 1894; C. atrata, Meeuan, Contr. Greenl.,
ex Hom, Contr. FI. Greenl.].
Curiously enough, this species has probably not been found within
our area before NatHorst’s visit to Ivsugigsok; it has been overlooked
even in Foulke Fjord by Hayes and Harr. It is, however, very com-—
mon and abundant there, and in a great measure forms the sward of
many sloopes and rockledges, or appears in large, dense tufts on the
plains of gravel or clay.
It is not reported from the regions north of the Humboldt Glacier
by those collectors who have brought home plants from there, but as,
according to Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp., p. 38, it is very abundant on the
western side of the Channels, even as far north as at Lady Franklin
Bay and in the interior of Grinnell Land, and likewise in N. E. Green-
land (Kruuse, List E. Greenl., p. 194), it can hardly be absent from the
upper part of N. W. Greenland. There also exists a statement which
points to its appearance there. Mrexan, Contr. Greenl., p. 214, speaks
of specimens of “Carex atrata, Boorr” in the herbarium of the Aca-
demy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, collected by Dr. Brssets at
lat. 81—82°. Now Meeuan, as usual, has arrived at a wrong determi-
nation of his own specimens, which belong, according to Hoim, Contr.
FI. Greenl., p. 544, to C. misandra, and thus it seems probable that
Bessets’ plant is the same. But there is yet another difficulty. BEssEzs,
in his list (Exp. Pol. Amer., p. 297, and Amer. Nordpol-Exp., p. 304)
has no other Carex but C. dioica. Now a confusion of two species so
widely different seems quite out of the question, yet how is the state-
ment of Meruan then to be understood? Osrenretp, Fl. Arct., p. 90,
gives the West Greenland range of C. misandra as lat. 67°—82°, but
quotes only Weruerit for the distribution in N. W. Greenland. I think
the occurrence there must, for the present, be left as doubtful.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NaTHoRST); Inglefield Gulf: M’Cor-
mick Bay (MzeHan), Cape Acland (Wernerit); Foulke Fjord at Rein-
deer Point and Etah (Stein, 229, 1516, 1535). (N. Hall Land (BessEts)?).
94 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Carex rigida, Gooo.
C. rigida, Goopenoucu, Obs. Br. Carex, 1794; OsTenrezp, FI.
Arct.; Lanax, Consp. Fl. Groenl.; Kruuse, List E. Greenl. et List Ang-
mags.; Natuorst, N. W.: Grénl.; Hooxer, Fl. Bor. Amer:; Ksetiman, in
Vegaexp.; Horm, Nov. Zeml. Veg.; Fritpen, Fl. Kolguev; AnpErsson
& HesseLman, Spetsb. karlv.; Harrman, Skand. Fl.; C. sawatilis, Waun-
LenBeRG, Fl. Lapp.; Lepesour, Fl. Ross.; non Linnazus, Sp. Plant.
Fig. Fl. Dan., T. 159, 2479, 2480; AnpEersson, Cyp. Scand., T. 5,
fig. 46; OsTENFELD, |. c., fig. 52.
As C. rigida shows a very considerable resemblance to C. aqua-
tilis var. stans, which is a very common plant in Ellesmereland, and
not at all rare in the northern part of Danish Greenland, I was for a
time disposed to look upon all the statements about C. rigida from N.
W. Greenland as by right referable to C. aquatilis var. stans. I have,
however, found that NatHorst’s specimens from Ivsugigsok cannot be
transferred to it, and consequently the other indications may also belong
to the species here in question, and must be discussed in detail.
Duranp, Pl. Kan., p. 199, says about C. rigida, “frequent at al-
most every station”. I think, however, that no heed is to be paid to
his statement, as he has reported no other Carex from N. W. Green-
land, and as Kane cannot have found this species so commonly distri-
buted and have overlooked other common species such for instance as
C. misandra. Furthermore, Duranp has not generally shown himself
very reliable in his identifications.
When the statement of the plant as common in our area is put
aside, we come to the same author’s report of it from Netlik in Enum.
Pl. Smith S., p. 95. What is meant here I am of course not able to
ascertain, not having the specimens at my disposal.
Further, there is Hart's report of it from Foulke Fjord (Bot. Br.
Pol. Exp., p. 39). As far as my notes from my studies in the Lon-
don collections afford evidence, there are no specimens from that locality
either in the Natural History Museum or at Kew. All Hart's speci-
mens from Ellesmereland belong to C. aquatilis var. stans. This indeed
might be an inducement to refer the Foulke Fjord plant (if it is collected
there at all and only noted) to the same, but that again is unknown in
N. W. Grenland.
Besides Natuorst’s Ivsugigsok plant, which I have examined in the
Stockholm Museum, we have Werueri1’s reports in List 1894 left, which
I think we must accept as based on right determination.
1898—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W, GREENLAND. 95
As Hart, |. c., reports the species only from Foulke Fjord, I cannot
understand why Natnorst, N. W. Gronl., p. 83, and Laner, Consp. FI.
Groenl. IJ, p. 291, record it also for Polaris Bay, and Osrenrexp, |. ¢.,
p. 78, gives its West Greenland range as 60—81°.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (Natuorst); Inglefieid Gulf: (Netlik
(Hayzs)?); Cape Acland, Fan Glacier (WetTHERILL).
Distribution: East and West Greenland, Arctic American Archi-
pelago (S. E. part at least), Arctic America, Labrador, Canada, Rocky
Mountains, Andes of Chile, Land of the Chukches, Arctic Siberia, New
Siberian Islands, Central Asia, Himalaya, Ural, Arctic Russia, Novaja
Semlja, Kolguev, Spitsbergen, Northern and Central Europe, Great Bri-
tain, Faeroes, Iceland.
Carex glareosa, WAHLENB.
C. glareosa, Simmons, FI. Ellesm.
This is one of the species that I have mentioned in my Prel. Rep.
as new additions to the flora of N. W. Greenland. It grew rather abund-
antly within a small area among the rocks of Reindeer Point, and had
ripe fruit when collected, Aug. 16, 1898.
Occurrence. S. Foulke Fjord, Reindeer Point (253).
Carex incurva, Licutr.
C. incurva, Simmons, |]. Ellesm.
This sedge also is new for N. W. Greenland. I found the low form
with arched culms in a gravelly beach, together with Honkenya pe-
ploides; and, in another somewhat swampy locality, I found also a form
approaching var. erecta, Lana, (1512).
Occurrence. S. Foulke Fjord, Reindeer Point (228, 1512).
Carex nardina, FRI1&s.
C. nardina, Smmons, FI. Ellesm. [C. nardina, Hart, Bot. Br. Pol.
Exp.; Natuorst, N. W. Grénl.; Werner, List 1894].
In Foulke Fjord this species was rather common in rock-ledges and
dry, gravelly plains, as I am inclined to think it is all over the area.
Its abundant appearance in Ellesmereland, even in the northernmost
‘ Hart, lc, p.9, says about this locality “Cyperaceae appear to be entirely
absent”.
96 H. G. SIMMONS. (SEC. ARCT. EXP, FRAM
parts, makes this most probable. There are, however, only a few state-
ments about it in the papers of the earher authors.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NatHorst); Inglefield Gulf: Glacier
Valley (WETHERILL); Foulke Fjord (Harv, 239, 1490). N. Hannah Is-
land (Hart).
Carex scirpoidea, Micux.
C. scirpoidea, Mrcnavux, FI. Bor. Amer., 1803; Ostenre.p, FI. Arct.;
Lance, Consp. Fl. Groenl.; Kruusz, List E. Greenl. et List Angmags.;
WetuHerRiLL, List 1894; Hooker, FI. Bor. Amer.; Brirron & Brown, Ill.
Fl.; Ksetuman, Fan. Vestesk. land et As. Beringss. Fan.; Hartman,
Skand. Fl.; C. Wormskjoldiana, Hornemany, FI. Dan., 9, 1818, et Dansk
Oec. Plantel. I, Ed. 3.
Fig. Fl. Dan., T. 1528; Ostsnrerp, |. c., fig. 58.
I insert this species in the list entirely on the authority of Wetx-
ERILL, as I have not seen any specimens from North-Western Green-
land. As the species is spread generally all over Danish Greenland and
also in East Greenland, it seems a priori probable that it should grow
also within our area. ,
Occurrence. S. Cape York (WxrTHERILL).
Distribution: East and West Greenland, Baffin Land, Arctic
America, Canada, Mountains of New England, Rocky Mountains down
to Utah and California, Alaska, Chukches Land, Northern Norway |
(Saltdalen).
Carex dioica, L.
This species is reported only by Bsssets from Hall Land. Now if
there was only his own identification of it, I should not in the least
hesitate to exclude it from the flora, as it is highly improbable that it
would grow so far north as 81—82° N. and be lacking to the south;
but we have not got only Besses’ own word for it (Exp. Pol. Amer.,
p. 297), it is also maintained in his second list (Amer. Nordpol-Exp.,
p. 804) where the determinations are said to have been verified by Asa
Gray. Natuorst, who in N. W. Gronl. had excluded it as highly doubt-
ful, has given it, in Nachtr., a place in the list on the authority of Asa
Gray. Indeed Gray’s evidence would seem to be satisfactory, but as
there is yet another doubtlessly wrong identification in the list (Erio-
phorum vaginatum), I think one may be allowed still to doubt the
existence there of Carex dioica. The material may perhaps have been
1898—1902. No.16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..wW. GREENLAND. 97
very imperfect, or Gray may not have had any opportunity of verifying
all the identifications. Moreover there is the statement of MreHan quoted
above under C. misandra, that specimens of GC. atrala were brought
home by Bessexs. As the collector himself has only one species of
Carex in his list, it is hardly possible to reconcile two such different
statements, and hardly possible that even MesHan could have made such
a mistake.
The safest way, I think, will be to leave the plant in question out
of the list, until better evidence is forthcoming. Under such circum-
stances it may seem unprofitable to speculate further upon the real na-
ture of the plant in question; but if it really does belong to the form-
series of C. dioica, it is evidently not the main form, but either C. gy-
nocrates, Wormsks., which is found in Danish Greenland up to lat. 69° 16’,
or C. dioica var. parallela, Larst. (which should be regarded as a
separate species), which is found in Scoresby Sound on the east coast.
OstenFELD, Fl. Arct., p. 61, has referred it to the former.
Elyna Bellardi, (Aut.) Kocu.
EL. Bellardi, Simons, Fl. Ellesm. ([Kobresia scirpina, Mrenan,
Contr. Greenl.].
The great, habitual similarity of this plant to Carex nardina, in
whose company it grows on dry rock-ledges, in gravelly plains, etc.,
probably accounts for its absence from all lists of N. W. Greenland
plants except that of Mernan.
Occurrence. S. Inglefield Gulf: M’Cormick Bay (MEEHAN); Foulke
Fjord: Reindeer Point (231, 1489).
Eriophorum Scheuchzeri, Horre.
E. Scheuchzeri, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm. [£. Scheuchzeri, Natuorst,
N. W. Gronl.; Werner, List 1894; E. capitatum, Duranp, Pl. Kan.;
Harr, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; E. vaginatum, Bessets, Exp. Pol. Amer. et
Amer. Nordpol-Exp.; Hart, 1. ¢.].
As appears from the special synonymic here given, the plant in
question figures not only under the two names of E. Scheuchzeri and
E. capitatum, which are in fact synonymous, but also under the false
name of E. vaginatum. I have previously explained (I. c., p. 149—150) the
probable cause for this mistake. Indeed Harr (I. c., p. 39) has both in
his list, but J have sought in vain for specimens of E. vaginatum in the
7
98 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
London collections. None were there from N. W. Greenland under that
name, all Hart’s specimens being referred to E. Scheuchzeri. As more-
over E. vaginatum is found nowhere in the better known parts of Green-
land (when doubtful or decidedly wrong statements are left out of con-
sideration—cf. Laneg, Consp. Fl. Groenl., p. 129, and Simmons, Dan.
Greenl. pl., p. 478), I feel justified in not hesitating to refer all such state-
ments to EH. Scheuchzeri, even when that species is recorded alongside
of EF. vaginatum.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (Hart); Ivsugigsok (Natuorst);
Inglefield Gulf: Northumberland Island (Stem), Cape Acland and Fan
Glacier (WeETHERILL); Foulke Fjord (Hart), at Reindeer Point and Etah
(241, 1511); Rensselaer Harbour (Kane). N. Hall Land (Brssets).
Eriophorum polystachium, L.
E. polystachium, Simmons, FI. Ellesm. [E. polystachium, Durann,
Pl. Kan.; Werueriti, List 1894; EH. angustifolium, Naruorst, N. W.
Grénl.; Summons, Prel. Rep.].
Notwithstanding that this species is probably quite as common as
the last in all wet localities, it seems to have escaped most collectors,
as appears from the small list of localities.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NarHorst); Inglefield Gulf: Cape
Acland and Fan Glacier (WeTHERILL); Foulke Fjord, at Reindeer Point
and Etah (208, 1492, 1518); Rensselaer Harbour (Kane).
Gramineae.
Festuca ovina, L.
F. ovina, Simmons, FI. Ellesm.; Ostenretp, Plantes N. E. Gronl.
[F. ovina, Duranp, Pl. Kan.; Ostenretp, FI. pl. Cape York; F. ov. var.
violacea, Naruorst, N. W. Gronl.; F. ov. var. brevifolia, Hart, Bot.
Br. Pol. Exp.; Weruerity, List 1894).
Most of the specimens | saw at Foulke Fjord, where this grass was
very common and abundant, especially in drier localities, belonged to
the var. brevifolia, (R. Br.) Hart, which, in my opinion, cannot be
maintained as a species but is continually connected with the common
form from southern localities. This, however, may also be found in
the arctic regions, and I have specimens of it even from Foulke Fjord
(1486). Certainly, however, var. brevifolia is most common wherever
1898-1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W.GREENLAND. 99
F. ovina enters the arctic regions, as it is also in N. W. Greenland.
The specimens from Ivsugiksok, which Natuorst, N. W. Gronl., p. 27,
names as var. violacea, cannot be referred to the real F. violacea,
Gaup., but belong to var. brevifolia.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (Natuorst); Wolstenholme Sound:
Agpa (Saunders Island) and Umanak (Bate); Inglefield Gulf: North-
umberland Island (Stern); Foulke Fjord (Hart), at Etah (Stem) and
Reindeer Point (230, 1485, 1486); Rensselaer Harbour and Mary Minturn
River (Kane). N. Polaris Bay (Hart).
Glyceria Vahliana, (Lies.) Tu. FRIgs.
I cannot of course decide what plant it may be which Durann,
Enum. Pl. Smith S., p. 95, has designed as “Poa Vahliana, Bot. Dan.?
(too young)”, but it may perhaps be the real G. Vahliana, which occurs
sporadically in different arctic lands. The locality is noted as “Port
Foulke etc., July 15”.
Glyceria tenella, LANGE.
G. tenella, Lancer, in Ksettman & Lunpstrém, Fan. Nov. Senl.,
1882; Geert, in Ostenretp, Fl. Arct.; G. Langeana, Berwin, Karly.
sv. exp. Grénl.; Lance, Consp. Fl. Groenl. II; Rosenviner, 2 Till. et
Nye Bidr.
Fig. Ksettman & Lunpstrom, l.c., T. 6; Ostenretp, |. c., fig. 95.
The specific rank of this plant, which seems restricted to Greenland
and Novaja Semlja, is perhaps somewhat doubtful, as is also that of the
following. I think it best, however, for the present to follow Geert,
l.c., in keeping them both distinct from G. distans. I had not yet sub-
jected my Glyceriae to a closer examination when I published my Pre-
liminary Report. G. tenella was found sparingly on clay plains together
with other grasses.
Occurrence. S. Foulke Fjord at Etah (1478).
Distribution: West Greenland (sporadic), East Greenland (speci-
mens of a Glyceria collected in Kjerulf Fjord, Aug. 11 and 13, 1899,
by A. G. Natuorst and P. Dusen, which Kruuss refers to the following
species, seem rather to belong to the present), Waigats and Novaja
Semlja.
Glyceria angustata, (R. Br.) Tu. Fries.
G. angustata, Simmons, FI. Ellesm.
100 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
This seems to be a rare species in N. W. Greenland, as it is only
collected by Batre (Ostenretp, Fl. pl. Cape York) and myself (for the
G. angustata of Naruorst from Ivsugigsok see Simmons, |. c., p. 157,
and under the next species). It grew on the gravelly beach near Rein-
deer Point, rather sparingly.
Occurrence. S,. Wolstenholme Sound: Agpa (Saunders Island)
and Umanak (Batxe); Foulke Fjord near Reindeer Point (1527).
Glyceria distans, (L.) WaAHLENB.
G. distans, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm. [G. distans, Ostenrexp, Fl. pl.
Cape York; G. angustata, Naruorst, N. W. Gronl.}.
Probably this species is quite as common as in Ellesmereland, but
most collectors have left the grasses unnoticed and consequently only a
few statements about them exist in the literature about N. W. Green-
land. At Foulke Fjord it grew abundantly in the rich soil of the old
Eskimo village of Etah. The form I found there was var. arctica, (Hoox.)
GELERT, which is already reported from another point in that neighbour-
hood by Duranp, Enum. pl. Smith S._ I have ascertained in the arctic
herbarium of the Stockholm museum that the G. angustata of Nar-
HorsT, |. c., is the other variety vaginata, (LANGE) GELERT.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NatHorst); Wolstenholme Sound:
Agpa and Umanak (Batue); Foulke Fjord: Port Foulke (Hayes) and
Etah (236).
Glyceria maritima, (Hups.) Wants.
var. reptans, (HartTM.) Sr.
G. marit. var. reptans, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm. [G. vilfoidea, Nat-
Horst, N. W. Gronl.].
As I have previously mentioned (I. c. p. 160) my Foulke Fjord
specimens of this plant are somewhat different from those of Ellesmere-
land. They are considerably stouter, have longer leaves, and not such
long-creeping and densely radicant stolons. This may be accounted for
by the habitat, which was rather different from the usual, somewhat
loamy, beach localities of the plant. Here it grew in fissures and de-
pressions of the rocks, near the beach on Reindeer Point, that is to say
in more sheltered places than on the open shore. That may also, I think,
account for the fact that the plant had here produced a few inflores-
cences, while it was always found sterile in Ellesmereland. These pan-
icles, which on account probably of the dry situation, were already
1898—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W.GREENLAND. 101
withered when the specimens were collected, Aug. 11, 1899, were small
and contracted, with few spikelets on short branches. The number of
flowers in each spikelet does not exceed two, sometimes only one flower
is developed. Here consequently we find the typical features of “G.
vilfoidea”, but the vegetative parts call to mind rather the description
of the var. arenaria, Fries (Mantissa, 2, p. 9). The specimens of Nat-.
HorsT, which I saw in the Stockholm herbarium, represent the common
arctic form of var. reptans.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NatHorst); Foulke Fjord, Reindeer
Point (1479).
Dupontia Fisheri, R. Br.
D. Fisheri, Simmons, FI. Ellesm.; D. psilosantha, Ruprecut, Fl.
Samojed. cisural. [D. psilosantha, Bessers, Amer. Nordpol-Exp.; Nat-
Horst, Nachir.].
This grass has been identified by Asa Gray in Dr. BesseEts’ col-
lection, and thus another locality added to its sporadic distribution in
the arctic regions, [ am, however, inclined to think, that it may often
be sterile and therefore may easily be overlooked.
Occurrence. N. Hall Land (Bessexs).
Distribution. To the statements included in my Fl. Ellesm.,
p. 161, must be added North-Eastern Greenland.
Poa glauca, VaunL.
P. glauca, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm. [P. glauca, Natuorst, N. W.
Grénl.; P. caesia, Dickie, Not. fl. pl., in Increrietp, Summer Search].
I do not hesitate to pronounce this grass to be one of the most
common plants of N. W. Greenland, notwithstanding that it is absent
from the list of most collectors. This must, however, be because they
have confounded it with others, or have totally overlooked it. Neither
Hart nor Haves, for instance, have noted it for Foulke Fjord, where
it is extremely common and appears both in the typical form and in the
varieties elatior, (ANpERsS.) Lance, and tenuior, Simm. Of the latter I
found a few individuals only, in fissures of the rock at Reindeer Point
(1467); the former I found in abundance in large luxuriant tufts on the
manured soil of Etah (235); the main form I found in various local-
ities such as slopes, rookeries, etc.
102 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Occurrence. 3S. Ivsugigsok (NatuHorst); Inglefield Gulf: Burdin
Bay (INGLEFIELD, STEIN); Foulke Fjord at Etah, Reindeer Point, etc.
(Stern, 232, 235, 1467, 1468, 1522).
Poa abbreviata, R. Br.
P. abbreviata, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm.; OSTENFELD, Plantes N. E. Gronl.
[P. abbreviata, WetTuERILL, List 1894].
Seems to be a rare species on this side of Smith Sound, notwith-
standing its general appearance on the american side. I only saw a
few individuals of it in Foulke Fjord in a dry slope.
Occurrence. S. Inglefield Gulf: Netiulumi (WETHERILL); Foulke
Fjord, near Etah (1487).
Poa alpina, L.
Although the species is recorded again and again from different
localities in N. W. Greenland (by Dickie, Duranp, and Hart), as also
from Ellesmereland, I feel justified in excluding it here as I have done
in my Fl. Ellesm., because there is not a single specimen in the Lon-
don collections to support those records. As for the american collec-
tions, I have of course not seen them, but Durann’s identifications are
always subject to doubt and cannot be used when improbable. It is
not easy to say what plant those authors may have had in view: it
may have been both P. glauca and P. cenisia. It seems, however,
most probable that they have identified with P. alpina the same form
of P. cenisia which puzzled me at Harbour Fjord in Ellesmereland and
which is very similar to P. alpina because of the short internodes of
the rhizome, that give it an almost tufted mode of growth. From speci-
mens in the Stockholm herbarium it appears that Natuorst has col-
lected such a form at Ivsugigsok, but he has not allowed himself to be
led astray by its unusual habit. He speaks also, N. W. Gronl., p. 27,
of P. flecuosa, Wautens., forming dense mats below the rookeries.
I think I may refer all the localities mentioned for P. alpina to
P. cenisia without any fear of making a wrong statement, as the latter
common plant is certainly not lacking in any of them.
P. cenisia, Aut.
P. cenisia, Simmons, FI. Ellesm.; Ostenretp, Plantes N. E. Gronl.
[P. cenisia, SutHertanp, Voyage; Werueriiy, List 1894; P. arc-
1898—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 103
tica, Duranp, Enum. pl. Smith S.; Besseis, Exp. Pol. Amer. et Amer.
Nordpol-Exp.; P. flecuosa, Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Natuorst, N. W.
Gronl.; P. pratensis, Meeuan, Contr. Greenl., ex Hom, Contr. Fl. Greenl.;
P. alpina, Duranp, Pl. Kan.; Dicxte, Not. fl. pl., in INcLerreLp, Sum-
mer Search; Harr, |. ¢.]}.
As may be seen in the above special synonymic, this species is
entered in the different lists under quite a series of more or less appro-
priate names. I have already spoken about the P. alpina of several
authors.
Doubtless P. cenisia is quite as common in different kinds of lo-
calities within our present area as in Ellesmereland, at least such was
the case at Foulke Fjord.
Occurrence. S. Bushnan Island (SurHERLAND); Cape York (Hart);
Ivsugigsok (NaTHorst); Wolstenholme Sound (IneterteLp); Inglefield
Gulf: Northumberland Island (Stem), M’Cormick Bay (Meewan), Cape
Acland (Wetueritt); Foulke Fjord (Hart), at Port Foulke (Hayes), Etah
(Stein, 1477) and Reindeer Point (233, 1528); Rensselaer Bay (Kane).
N. Bessels Bay, Hannah Island, Cape Morton (Hart); Hall Land (Bzs-
sELs); Polaris Bay (Hart).
Poa pratensis, L,
Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp., p. 40, records this species also from Foulke
Fjord. Now indeed, as it grows in Ellesmereland even in the Hayes
Sound district, it is not at all impossible that it may be found also in
the neighbouring parts of Greenland; but, on the other hand, I have
not, so far as my notes show, seen any specimens from those regions
in the London collections, and this, together with its great likeness to
P. cenisia, makes it more probable that Harr had the latter in view.
The more so, as no other collector has found it in that comparatively
well-explored place. I therefore think it better not to give it any place
as a member of the N. W. Greenland flora until more reliable evidence
is procured.
Pleuropogon Sabinei, R. Br.
P. Sabinei, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm.
Ivsugigsok, where NatTHorst found it in 1883 (N. W. Grénl.), still
stands as the only locality in N. W. Greenland of this beautiful and
interesting grass. It is not, however, improbable that it was seen in
Foulke Fjord during our second visit there. Mr. Bay, the zoologist of
104 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
the expedition, told me that when he visited some lakelets in a valley
beyond the range above Etah, which I could not reach during our short
stay, he had seen a grass there with long floating leaves. Now of course
that may have been the water-form of Alopecurus alpinus, but it is at
least equally probable that it was Pleuropogon. It is very much to be
regretted, that he did not bring a specimen with him; but, on the other
hand, this note may perhaps induce some botanist who may visit the
fjord in the future, to examine that part of its surroundings where, in
all probality, other additions to the flora might also be made, as water-
plants are very scantily represented in the present list.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NaTHOoRST).
Catabrosa algida, (Souanp.) FR.
C. algida, Simmons, FI. Ellesm.; Ostenretp, Plantes N. E. Gronl.
(CO. algida, Natuorst, N. W. Groénl.; Phippsia algida, Hart, Bot. Br.
Pol. Exp.; Wertuerity, List 1894; Ph, monandra, Dickie, Not. fl. pl.,
in INGLEFIELD, Summer Search].
Occurrence. S.Cape York (Hart, Stein); Ivsugigsok (NaTHoRs‘);
Carey Islands: Bjérling Island (WeETHERILL); Wolstenholme Sound (INc-
LEFIELD); Inglefield Gulf: Burdin Bay (InGLeFreLp), Northumberland
Island (Stein); Foulke Fjord, Reindeer Point (1472).
Trisetum spicatum, (L.) Ricut.
T. spicatum, Simmons, FI. Ellesm. [T7. subspicatum, Duranp, PI.
Kan.; T. sesquiflorum, Meenan, Contr. Greenl., ex Hoxm, Contr. FI.
Greenl.].
It is probable that this species is not common, as it is missing
also from the lists of those collectors who have worked systematically
and thoroughly, such for instance as Natuorst, WETHERILL. It is, how-
ever, not rare at Foulke Fjord, where I found it both on the sandy
beach outside Reindeer Point, and also in the rook-crannies of that point
and in the gravel slope at Etah.
Occurrence. S. Inglefield Gulf: M’Cormick Bay (MeeHan); Foulke
Fjord: at Reindeer Point and Etah (212, 1476, 1526); Bedevilled Reach
(Kane).
Aira caespitosa, L. var. arctica, (TRIN.) Sim.
A. caespitosa var. arctica, Simmons, FI]. Ellesm. [Deschampsia
brevifolia, WrTuHERILL, List 18941.
1898—1902. No. 16.) FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND. 105
It must be taken for granted, I think, that the plant from Ingle-
field Gulf in WeTHERILL’s list is really the same as that found in the
northern, western and southern parts of Ellesmereland as well as in
other parts of the Arctic American Archipelago. It is indeed curious,
that it should be absent from just that part of Ellesmereland which lies
nearest to the Smith Sound region of N. W. Greenland. However, even
if it does not grow in the Hayes Sound district it may perhaps exist in
the little-known region down to Clarence Head; and at all events, there
are other species lacking, or rare, in the Hayes Sound region, which are
common to the south coast of Ellesmereland and the southern part of
N. W. Greenland. Moreover, the plant here in question is also found
in North-Eastern Greenland. I therefore think it best to give it a place
in the list on the authority of WeTHERILL, although I wish very much
that I could first have made an examination of it, the more so as it is
not only in itself critical but there is also the following still somewhat
doubtful species, to which it might be referred.
Occurrence. S. Inglefield Gulf: Cape Acland (WerseriLt).
Aira flexuosa, L.
‘A. flecuosa, Simmons, FI. Ellesm.
The Aira, which Natuorst collected at Ivsugigsok in 1883 and in
N. W. Gronl., p. 27, refers to the same plant that Ros. Brown had
described in Chlor Melv. as Deschampsia brevifolia, has given me a
good deal of trouble, as has also my own plant from Fram Harbour in
Eastern Ellesmereland. They are very like each other, the principal
difference being that my plant has all the leaves flat, NatHorst’s has
them generally convolute. Both differ from the common A. flexuosa
in possessing a short awn, which is not, or at least very little, excerted
beyond the glume. But in other respects they agree with that species
far more than with A. caespitosa, and they call to mind especially the
form which Berun, Karly. sv. exp. Grénl., p. 77, has called A. fleauosa
var. montana {. pallida, which has the same short, straight, included
awn. For the present, until a better material can be procured by some
future collector, I must, even if I cannot do so without some hesitation,
let it stand where I placed it in my Ellesmereland flora.
Natuorst, however, in the same paper, speaks also about another
Aira, which he found on Hare Island in Danish Greenland and referred
to the same variety, although he speaks of differences between them.
As I have previously mentioned (Dan. Greenl. PI., p. 478), this is in fact
106 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
quite another plant, which should be called A. caespitosa var. brevifolia,
(Marscu. v. Bres.) Hartm., of which it represents a small and stunted
form.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NaTHorst).
Agrostis canina, L.
The A. canina 6 melaleuca, Bone., of Duranp, Pl. Kan., which is
said to have been collected at Smith Sound as well as at Sukkertoppen,
is decidedly a very doubtful plant. No other collector has found the
variety in Greenland, and the species is restricted to the southernmost
part of Danish Greenland between lat. 60° and 61°. I feel, therefore,
fully justified in excluding it from the list.
Arctagrostis latifolia, (R. Br.) GrRisEs.
A. latifolia, Simmons, Fl. Ellesm. [A. latifolia, WeETHERILL, List
1894; Colpodium latifolium, Natuorst, N. W. Gronl.].
Often sterile and thus easily overlooked, as I too did during my
first visit to Foulke Fjord. When I went there again in 1899 and
turned my attention to finding it, I saw it in many places along brooks,
in moist depressions, ete. I therefore think that it is far more common
throughout the area than appears from the few records of it.
Occurrence. S. Ivsugigsok (NatHorst); Inglefield Gulf: Cape Ac-
land (WeTHERILL); Foulke Fjord at Reindeer Point and Etah (1464, 1513).
Alopecurus alpinus, SM.
A. alpinus, Simmons, FI. Ellesm.; Ostenreip, Plantes N. E. Gronl.
[A. alpinus, Suruertanp, Voyage; Dicxre, Not. fl. pl., in InGLertecp,
Summer Search; Duranp, Pl. Kan. et Enum. pl. Smith S.; BesseExs,
Exp. Pol. Amer. et Amer. Nordpol-Exp.; Hart, Bot. Br. Pol. Exp.; Nar-
Horst, N. W. Gronl.; Wertuerity, List 1894].
Common everywhere in the most different situations, immediately
catching the eye and so easily identified, that it has got a place in the
list of every collector, always under its right name. I may, however,
give a list of the places from whence it is mentioned in literature.
Occurrence. S. Bushnan Island (SutHERLAND); Cape York (Hart,
WETHERILL, StrIN); Ivsugigsok (NaTHorst); Wolstenholme Sound: Dal-
rymple Rock (WetHERiLL); Inglefield Gulf: Whale Sound, Burdin Bay
(IncLerreLp), Netiulumi (WerHerrtt), Hakluyt Island (Kane), Norhum-
1898 -1902. No. 16} FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W.GREENLAND, 107
berland Island (Kang, Srein); Cape Alexander (Kane); Foulke Fjord,
everywhere (Hayes, Hart, Stein, 234); Bedevilled Reach (Kang). N.
Along the Kennedy Channel (Kane); Bessels Bay, Cape Morton, Hannah
Island (Hart); Hall Land (Bessexs); Polaris Bay (Hart).
Hierochloa alpina, (Litsesu.) Roem & Scuutt.
H. alpina, Simmons, FI. Ellesm. [H. alpina, SUTHERLAND, Voyage;
Natuorst, N. W. Groénl.; Mernan, Contr. Greenl.; WETHERILL, List 1894].
From the doubtful “Tessiussak, Sept. 4”, Duranp, Enum. pl. Smith
S., reports H. borealis, which in Hayes’s own list in Op. Pol. Sea, is cor-
rected to H. alpina. Besides this worthless record there are several
others, which seem to imply that the plant in question is not rare in
the southern part of N. W. Greenland,
Occurrence. S. Bushnan Island (SurHERLAND); Cape York (Stern);
Ivsugigsok (NatHorst); Inglefield Gulf: Northumberland Island (Srzry),
M’Cormick Bay (MgEHAN), Bowdoin Bay (WeETHERILL); Foulke Fjord at
Etah (Stein, 203).
Lycopodiaceae.
Lycopodium Selago, L.
L. Selago, Summons, Fl. Ellesm. [L. Selago, Weruern, List 1894}.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (WeTHERILL); Inglefield Gulf: North-
umberland Island (Stery).
Equisetaceae.
Equisetum arvense, L.
E. arvense, Simmons, FI. Ellesm. [E. arvense, Weruerit, List
1894].
My specimens, which were found in a small, moist depression of
the rock, growing among moss, are of the same small form as those I
found in Ellesmereland, and may best be referred to var. riparium,
(Fr.) Mipz. They are all sterile.
Occurrence. S. Cape York (WeruHermLL); Inglefield Gulf: North-
umberland Island (Stern); Foulke Fjord at Reindeer Point (1515).
108 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Polypodiaceae.
Aspidium fragrans, (L.) Sw.
A. fragrans, Simmons, FI. Ellesm. [A. fragrans, WetueRILL, List
1894].
Occurrence S. Inglefield Gulf: Bowdoin Bay (WetHERILL).!
Cystopteris fragilis, (L.) Bernu.
C. fragilis, Simmons, FI. Ellesm. [C. fragilis, Duranp, Pl. Kan.:
WeTHERILL, List 1894].
Besides the localities, mentioned below, where the species is found,
there is one more in Duranp’s list of Kane’s plants (Pl. Kan., p. 201)
which may perhaps belong to it, even though it seems at least equally
probable that the following one is meant. Duranp says under Cysto-
pteris: “Another state (very young) of propably the same fern was col-
lected at Rensselaer Harbour. It is scarcely more than 4 inches long,
narrower and less divided, without fruit dots.”
In Foulke Fjord it grew here and there in crevisses of the rocks.
Occurrence. S, Wolstenholme Sound (Kane); Inglefield Gulf:
Bowdoin Bay (WETHERILL); Foulke Fjord: Reindeer Point (222, 1465).
Woodsia glabella, R. Br.
W. glabella, Smmons, FI. Ellesm.; W. ilvensis var. glabella, OstTEN-
FELD, Plantes N. E. Gronl. .
Only found in Foulke Fjord, where it grew sparingly in the fissures
of rock above Reindeer Point. Perhaps, however, the above mentioned
statement of Duranp may have reference to this species.
Occurrence. S. Foulke Fjord (1491).
1 Gevert in Osrenretp. FI. Arct., p.5, gives the northern limit in Greenland of this
fern as 78° 30', which must be a mistake as he only quotes Werueritt and his
locality lies about one degree to the south.
1898—1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N..W. GREENLAND. 109
List of literature not quoted in “The Vascular Plants in the
Flora of Ellesmereland’’, and forming an Appendix
to the bibliography given there.
Bessexs, E., L’expedition polaire américaine, sous les ordres du Capitaine Hat.
Bull. de la Soc. de Géographie. Ser. 6, T. 9. Paris 1875. (Hap. Pol. Amer.)
— Die amerikanische Nordpol-Expedition. Leipzig 1879. (Amer. Nordpol-Exp.)
Dautstept, H., Arktiska och alpina arter inom formgruppen Taraxacum cerato-
phorum (Led.) DC. Arkiv f. Bot. 5. Stockholm 1906. (Tarac. ceratoph.)
Dawson, G. M., Notes to accompany a geological map of the Northern portion
of the Dominion of Canada, east of the Rocky Mountains. Geol. a. Nat.
Hist. Survey of Canada, Part R. Ann. Rep. 1886. Montreal 1887. (Geol. Map)
Nickie, G., Notes on Flowering Plants and Algae, collected during the Voyage
of the “Isabel”. In Ineterietp, Summer Search. (Not. fl. pl.)
Fries, E., Flora Hallandica. Lund 1817—18. (Fl. Hail.)
Gein, C. C., Flora badensis, alsatica et confinium regionum. Karlsruhe
1805— 1826. (FL. Bad.)
- Geuin, J. G., Flora Sibirica. Petersburg 1747-1769. (Fl. Sibir.)
Geixir, J., The Great Ice Age and its relation to the antiquity of Man. Ed.3
London 1894. (Great Ice Age)
Goovenoucu, S., Observations on the British Species of Carex. Transact. Lin.
Soc. Il. London 1794. (Obs. Br. Carex)
Hanpet-Mazerti, H. v., Monographie der Gattung Taraxacum. Leipzig & Wien
1907. (Mon. Gatt. Taras.)
Haves, J. J., At Arctic boat-journey in the autumn of 1854. London 1860.
(Arct. boat-journ.)
— Communication to the American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia. Pro-
ceed. Amer. Philos, Soc., 8. Philadelphia 1861 (?), pp. 883—393.
(Communication)
Hunson, W., Flora Anglica. Ed. H. London 1778. (Fl. Angl.)
Incierietp, E. A., A Summer Search for Sir John Franklin; with a peep into
the Polar Basin. London 1853. (Summer Search)
Kane, E. K., The U. S. Grinnell Expedition in Search of Sir John Franklin.
New York 1854. (I Grinnell Exp.)
— Arctic Explorations: The Second Grinnell Expedition in Search of Sir
John Franklin, 1853, 54, 55. Philadelphia & London 1856. (Arct. Explor.)
Krvuse, C., List of Phanerogams and Vascular Cryptogams found in the Ang-
magsalik District on the East coast of Greenland between 65° 30‘ and
66° 20’ lat. N. Medd. om Grénl. 30. Kobenhavn 1906. (List Angmags.)
Linvserc, H., Om de i Finland férekommande Montiaformerna. Medd. Soc.
Fauna et Flora fenn., 27. Helsingfors 1901. (Finl. Montiaf.)
Marcuam, A. H., A whaling cruise to Baffin’s Bay and the Gulf of Boothia.
London 1874. (Whal. Cruise)
Micuavux, A., Flora Boreali-Americana. Paris 1820. (Fl. Bor. Amer.)
110 H. G. SIMMONS. |SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Natuorst, A. G., Nachtrage zu den ‘“Notizen iiber die Phanerogamen-flora Grén-
lands im Norden von Melville Bay (76°—82°)”. Englers Jahrb., Bd. 7.
Leipzig 1886. (Nachtr.)
Ostenretp, C. H., Plantes récoltées a la cote Nord-Est du Grénland. Due d’Or-
Lens, Croisiére Oceanographique accomplie 4 bord de la Belgica dans la
mer du Groénland 1905. Bruxelles 1907. (Plantes N. E. Grénl.}
Reicuensacu, H. G.L., Flora germanica excursoria. Leipzig 1830—833. (Fl. germ. exc.)
Ruprecat, F. J., Flores Samojedorum cisuralensium. Beitr. zu Pflanzenkunde
d. Russ. Reiches, herausg. v. d. Kais. Acad. d. Wissensch., II. Peters-
burg 1845. (Fl. Samojed. cisural.)
Smmons, H. G., Remarks about the relations of the floras of the Northern
Atlantic, the Polar Sea, and the Northern Pacific. Beih. z. Botan. Cen-
tralbl. Bd. 19, Abt. 2. Leipzig 1905. (Relations of floras)
— The Vascular Plants in the Flora of Ellesmereland. Rep. Sec. Norw.
Arct. Exp., No. 2. Kristiania 1906. (Fl. Ellesm.)
Surnertanp, P. C., Journal of a Voyage in’ Baffin’s Bay and Barrow Straits,
in the years 1850—51. London 1852. (Voyage)
Torrey, J., A Flora of the Northern and Middle sections of the United States, I.
New York 1824. (Fl. Unit. States)
Wotr, T., Monographie der Gattung Potentilla. Bibl. Botan. Stuttgart 1908,
(Mon. Gatt Potent.)
Printed 24. april 1909.
1898-1902. No. 16.] FLOW. PLANTS AND FERNS OF N.-W. GREENLAND.
111
Errata.
P. 10, line 17 stands ‘“‘avay”
= oo
- 16, , 2 —
- 18 , 2 —
. 22, ”
- 24, ”
«89, 4 AF
- 3, , 22 =
BAR, Phy
«4%, « 10 =
- 72, note _
- 76, line 3 —
“Journal”
“exluded”
“breath”
“Ameirean”
“aquatillis”
“arenosa”
“Expl.”
for “away”,
» ‘journal’,
» “excluded”,
» “breadth”,
30 “the number for” to be excluded,
10 stands “Renselaer”
for “Rensselaer”,
» “American”,
» “aquatilis”,
» “arenicola”,
“Explor.”,
REPORT OF THE SECOND NORWEGIAN ARCTIC EXPEDITION
IN THE “FRAM” 1898—1902. No. 17.
HANS KIAR:
ON THE BOTTOM DEPOSITS
FROM
THE SECOND NORWEGIAN ARCTIC EXPEDITION IN THE “FRAM”
AT THE EXPENSE OF THE FRIDTJOF NANSEN FUND
FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE
PUBLISHED BY
VIDENSKABS-SELSKABET I KRISTIANIA
(THE SOCIETY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES OF KRISTIANIA)
IES,
KRISTIANIA
PRINTED BY A. W.BROGGER
1909
Introduction.
I, order to give an account of the occurrence of Foraminifera in
the waters explored by the 2nd Fram Expedition, I have investigated
some bottom samples and zoological material collected during this Ex-
pedition at a number of places, more especially in the northern part of
Jones Sound, along Kong Oscars Land, and partly also near North
Devon.
The bottom samples are from the following stations:
1) The Winter harbour, Havne Fjord. Depth 45 fathoms. July
24th, 1900.
2) The west side of the mouth of Stor Valley. Depth 10 fathoms.
July 26th, 1900.
3) Sjopolse Ness. Depth 15—25 fathoms. August 4th, 1900.
4) North of North Devon. West of Kent. Lat. 76° 41.5’ N.,
Long. 92° W. Depth 55 fathoms. August 20th, 1900.
5) Forvisnings Valley. Depth 2—20 fathoms. September 19th, 1900.
6) The upper part of Gaase Fjord. Depth 15 fathoms. September
20th, 1900.
7) The upper part of Gaase Fjord. Depth 3—20 fathoms. Sept-
ember 20th, 1900.
8) The upper part of Gaase Fjord. Depth 1—2 fathoms. August
2nd, 1901.
9) Gaase Fjord. Depth 7 fathoms. August 16th, 1901.
10) Gaase Fjord. August 30th, 1901.
Only six of the bottom samples contained mud, namely Nos. 2, 4,
5, 6, 7 and 8; and of these Nos. 5 and 6 were very small. Only four
of the bottom samples were large enough to be treated by Dr. Mapsen’s
method!. The mud contained sand, pebbles and various animals.
1 V. Mapsen. Istidens Foraminiferer i Danmark og Holsten. Copenhagen, 1899.
4 HANS KIER. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
The remaining samples from the bottom contained stones and vari-
ous specimens of animals, especially Bryozoa and Crustacea.
Dr. V. Mapsen has assisted me in the examination of some of
the Foraminifera, for which ready assistance I would here express my
thanks.
The depths from which the bottom samples have been taken are
generally small, seldom exceeding 25 fathoms, only 2 being taken from
somewhat greater depths, namely 45 and 55 fathoms.
The fact that the bottom samples, even in shallow water from 1 or
2 fathoms down to 25 fathoms and more, consisted of fine mud, seems
to indicate that the waters were land-locked, and with slack currents.
The Bottom Deposits.
July 24th, 1900. The Winter harbour, Havne Fjord. Depth 45 fa-
thoms. Small stones with adherent specimens of Foraminifera:
Truncatulina lobatula (cc)1
— akneriana (cc)
— orbignyana (r).
July 26th, 1900. The west side of the mouth of Stor Valley. Depth
10 fathoms. Grey mud with Ophiura sp. and Mollusca: Arca glaci-
alis (r), Saxicava arctica (r), Modiolaria corrugata (r), Astarte sp. (r).
Numerous specimens of Forminifera:
Haplophragmium canariense (r)
— glomeratum (r)
_ nanum (r)
Verneuilina pygmaea (r)
Valvulina fusca (x)
Spiroplecta biformis (r)
Textularia williamsoni (r)
Nodulina arctica (r)
— gracilis (r)®
Uvigerina pygmaea (r)
Cassidulina crassa (r)
Bolivina punctata (r)
1 cc indicates a great number of specimens, ¢ numerous, ra few or a single one.
2 See Synopsis of the Norwegian Marine Thalamophora. Report on Norwegian
Fishery and Marine Investigations, Vol. 1, No.7. Kristiania, 1900.
1898 — 1902. No. 17.] ON THE BOTTOM DEPOSITS. 5
Virgulina schreibersiana. (c)
Nodosaria, young sp. (r)
Cornuspira foliacea (c)
Quinqueloculina subrotunda (r)
Truncatulina akneriana (c)
Nonionina scapha (c)
— stelligera (c)
Polystomella striatopunctata (r)
Pulvinulina karsteni (r)
Polymorphina compressa (r).
August 4th, 1900. Sjopolse Ness. Depth 15—25 fathoms. Small
stones. Foraminifera:
Truncatulina lobatula (c)
= akneriana (c)
Discorbina globularis (c)
Haplophragmium canariense (c)
August 20th, 1900. Lat. 76° 41.5’ N., Long. 93° W. North of North
Devon. West of North Kent. Depth 55 fathoms. Grey mud with few
Foraminifera :
Spiroplecta biformis (cc)
Haplophragmium glomeratum (vr)
—_ nanum (r)
Astrorhiza arenaria (r)
Rhabdammina sp. (r)
Reophax difflugiiformis (r)
Quinqueloculina seminulum (r)
September 19th, 1900. Forvisnings Valley. Depth 2—20 fathoms.
Clay and pebbles. Foraminifera:
Haplophragmium canariense (c)
Discorbina araucana (c)
Polystomella arctica (c)*
— striatopunctata var. incerta (c)
Nonionina stelligera (c).
1 See Om Kvarteertidens marine avleiringer ved Tromso. Tromso Museums aars
hefter, 25, 1908. Tromso. p. 44. English summary.
6 HANS KLER, [SEC. ARCT, EXP. FRAM
September 20th, 1900. The upper part of Gaase Fjord. Depth 15
fathoms. Soft, brown clay, with numerous animals and plants, as also
pebbles.
Mollusca: Nucula tenuis, Modiolaria, Astarte, Sawicava, Leda,
Margarita.
Ophiura sp., Spirorbis sp. Isopoda. Ostracoda. Diatomacea. Green
algee with adherent Bryozoa and Foraminifera:
Hyperammina nodulosa (c)
Haplophragmium canariense (c)
— cassis (r)
— glomeratum (c)
— nanum (r)
Saccammina socialis (r)
Verneuilina pygmaea (c)
Spiroplecta biformis (cc)
Textularia Williamsonii (cc)
Nodulina arctica (r)
— gracilis (r)
Ammodiscus gordialis (r)
Virgulina schreibersiana (r)
Polymorphina lactea (r)
— acuta (r)
Cassidulina crassa (c)
— laevigata (r)
Nodosaria calomorpha (r)
Lagena striata (r)
Pullenia bulloides (c)
Quinqueloculina seminulum (c)
— subrotunda (r)
a arenacea (r)
Patellina corrugata (c)
Truncatulina lobatula (c)
— akneriana (c)
Pulvinulina punctulata (cc)
= karstenti (r)
Polystomella arctica (c)
= striatopunctata var. incerta (c).
4898—1902. No. 17.] ON THE BOTTOM DEPOSITS. 7
September 20th. 1900. Depth 3—20 fathoms. Clay, pebbles and
shells of Mollusca. Foraminifera:
Tholosina vescicularis (c)
Nodulina scorpiura (r)
Truncatulina akneriana (r)
Discorbina araucana (r)
Polystomella striatopunctata var. incerta (cc).
August 2nd, 1901. The upper part of Gaase Fjord. Depth 1—2 fa-
thoms. Soft, brown clay, with pebbles, sand and Mollusca:
Portlandia arctica (r), Nucula tenuis (r), some small Mollusca.
Annellida. Copepoda. Fishes’ eggs. Ostracoda. A great number of
worms, especially Nematoda, and also numerous fibres of plants. Fora-
minifera:
Haplophragmium canariense (r)
Spiroplecta biformis (r)
Nodulina gracilis (r)
Virgulina schreibersiana (c)
Cassidulina laevigata (r)
— crassa (c)
Polymorphina lactea (c)
Quinqueloculina seminulum (r)
Pulvinulina punctulata (r)
Nonionina depressula (r)
Polystomella striatopunctata var. incerta (cc)
August 16th, 1901. Gaase Fjord. Depth 7 fathoms. Foraminifera:
Truncatulina lobatula (c)
— . akneriana (c)
Discorbina araucana (c)
August 30th, 1901. Gaase Fjord. Ascidia and brown alge with
adherent specimens of Foraminifera:
Polystomella striatopunctata var. incerta (cc)
Truncatulina akneriana (r)
Patellina corrugata (r)
Quinqueloculina subrotunda (r).
8 HANS KIZR. ON THE BOTTOM DEPOSITS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Remarks on some of the Species of Foraminifera.
On looking at the list of the Foraminifera from the stations, it will
be seen that very few of the species appear in any quantity. Among
the characteristic species of more general occurrence may be mentioned
the large and beautiful forms, Hyperammina nodulosa and Haplo-
phragmium canariense, of which vigorous and well developed speci-
mens appear in Gaase Fjord. Spiroplecta biformis, Nodulina arctica
and Teatularia Williamsonii are also species that are found in the
sane localities in comparatively large numbers. Among the adherent
forms occurring are the cosmopolitan Truncatulina sp. and the Poly-
stomella striatopunctata var. incerta.
The arctic nature of the fauna is shown by the occurrence of large
and sometimes well-developed specimens of Polystomella arctica, and
further by the small, but characteristic forms, Cassidulina crassa and
Pulvinulina karsteni. Spiroplecta biformis and Nodulina arctica are
also of arctic origin.
The rare occurrence of the Lagena forms is to be noted. I found,
in fact, only a single specimen of Lagena (L. striata) in these bottom
samples, this being in mud from the upper part of Gaase Fjord, from a
depth of 15 fathoms. The Lagena species are usually well represented
in the arctic and boreal bottom deposits.
Printed 18. May 1909.
REPORT OF THE SECOND NORWEGIAN ARCTIC EXPEDITION
IN THE “FRAM” 1898—1902. No. 18.
G. 0. SARS:
CRUSTACEA
(WITH 12 AUTOGR. PLATES)
AT THE EXPENSE OF THE FRIDTJOF NANSEN FUND
FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE
PUBLISHED BY
VIDENSKABS-SELSKABETIKRISTIANIA
(THE SOCIETY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES OF KRISTIANIA)
KRISTIANIA
PRINTED BY A. W. BROGGER
1909 —
Introduction.
This collections of Crustacea brought home from the 2nd Fram
Expedition are rather extensive, having been made in many different
places and at different times. As a rule, only the larger and more
conspicuous forms were collected, and all these have turned out to
belong to well-known arctic and circumpolar species; but by a careful
examination of the bottom-residue of the large collecting bottles, I have
been enabled also to acquire some information concerning the smaller
forms of Isopoda, Amphipoda and Cumacea, as also the Ostracodu
and Copepoda. Of the last-named order there are some apparently
new species, which will be described and figured in the present Report,
together with a few previously recorded, but still less perfectly known
species. I give below a list of the several places (with dates) in which
Crustacea were collected.
1898.
April 30. Godthaab (fresh water).
July 10.
» 29. Egedes Minde.
» 23i. Disco.
Aug. 4&5. Upernivik, 4—13 fath.
Aug. 16. Faulke Fjord (fresh water).
» 18. Rice Strait. 2—5 fath.
» 19. Cape Sabine, Camp Clay.
» — Bay at Rice Strait.
» 22. Fresh water.
» 24 Rice Strait.
» 26. —
» 29. Cape Rutherford (fresh water).
Oct. 11. Haven in Rice Strait.
G. 0. SARS. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
1899,
June 17, Winter haven (brackish).
» 380. Rice Strait.
July 21. Winter haven.
» 24 Southern end of Penn Island, 6—10 fath.
July 29 & 30. Winter haven, 6 fath.
Sept. 3. The haven.
; 5. The Bay (pelagic).
1900.
March 7. Bay south of Sjopolse Ness, 15—20 fath.
June 22. The skerry, 5 fath.
» 23. Pelagic haul, 55 fath.
July 12. Bay at Last End.
» 22. Winter haven, 6—30 fath.
| 2B do., 6—20 fath.
» 4. do., 45 fath.
» . 26. Western side of the mouth of Stordalen, 6-10 f., clay.
» 28. Outside Gdedalen, 20 fath.
1. Outside the mouth of Stordalen, 10 fath.
3. do, 290 fath.
i 7. Ostcap, 10—25 fath.
7. Sjopelse Ness, 15—25 fath.
8. Winter haven, 15 fath.
Sept. 19. Outside the Forvisnings Valley, 2—20 fath.
» 20. Upper part of Gaase. Fjord, 3—20 fath, clay and
gravels,
1901.
June 28. Mouth of Hvalros Fjord.
» 29. Off the camping-ground.
July 5. The sound.
% 8. Ren Bay, Ellesmere Land.
» 18. Mouth of Gaase Fjord, 60 m.
Aug. 2. Upper part of Gaase Fjord.
» 16. About 7 fath.
» 980. 8 m,, clay and gravel, with alge.
1898-1902. No. 18.] CRUSTACEA. 5
1902.
July 5. Outside Havhest Fjord.
» Ad. do., 3—7 fath.
» 17. East of the great glacier, North Devon, ca. 3 fath.
» 19. North Devon, off the camping-ground, 3—7 fath.
Aug. 4. Gaase Fjord, north of the peninsula, 10—15 fath.
As all these localities lie within the same restricted area, I do not
consider it necessary, as a rule, to enumerate all the places where each
species was actually found.
In addition to the above-mentioned collections, a series of plankton-
samples were taken by the aid of a fine-meshed tow-net during the
voyage up Baffin’s Bay. In some of these samples a number of pelagic
Crustacea were found, and these will be mentioned together with the
other species enumerated below.
6 G. O. SARS. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
Systematic List of Species.
Order Decapoda.
Suborder Carida.
Fam. Crangonide.
1. Sclerocrangon boreas (Pupps).
Numerous specimens of this well-known arctic form, the greater
number of them immature, are in the collection, having been taken in
many different localites within the area investigated.
9. Sabinea septemcarinata (SaB.).
Of this form only 2 specimens were secured, both taken on Sept.
20, 1900, in the upper part of Gaase Fjord, at a depth of 3—25 fathoms.
Fam. Hippolytide.
3. Spirontocaris grénlandica (Fasr.).
Several specimens of this large and distinct arctic species were
taken in 10 different places.
4. Spirontocaris polaris (Sas.).
This form was found in great abundance in most of the localilies
investigated. Though undoubtedly, like the preceding species, of arctic
origin, it extends along the whole Norwegian coast, as far south as the
Christiania Fjord. On the other hand, it has not yet been found off
the British Isles.
5. Spirontocaris Gaimardi (Epw.).
Some specimens of this well-known form were taken in 7 different
places. Like the preceding species, it is distributed along the whole
Norwegian coast, as far south as Egersund.
4998—1902. No. 18.] CRUSTACEA. 7
6. Spirontocaris spinus (Sows.).
Of this form only 3 specimens were secured, 2 of them having
been taken on July 22, 1900, in the Winter haven, 6—20 fath., and the
third on June 28, 1901, at the mouth of Hvalros Fjord.
7. Spirontocaris turgida (Kroyer).
Numerous specimens of this form were taken on July 12, 1900, in the
bay at Last End. It was also found occasionally in 8 other places. Off
the Norwegian coast this form is wholly restricted to the arctic region.
Order Schizopoda.
Suborder Mysidacea.
Fam. Myside.
8. Mysis oculata (Fasr.)
This arctic form was taken in 9 different places, both at the bottom
and near the surface. In the latter case the specimens were chiefly
immature. .
Order Cummacea.
Fam. Leuconide.
9. Eudorella truncatula (Sp. Batt).
A solitary female specimen of this form, not yet recorded from
the arctic region, was found in the bottom-residue of one of the bottles
containing collections taken on July 12, 1909, from the bay at Last End.
Fam, Diastylide.
10. Diastylis scorpioides (Lepecuin).
Two specimens of this genuine arctic form were taken, one on
Aug. 26, 1898, in Rice Strait, the other on July 26, 1900, off the mouth
of Stordalen.
8 G. 0. SARS. [SEC. ARC, EXP. FRAM
Fam. Campylaspide.
11. Campylaspis carinata, Hansen.
A solitary female specimen of this peculiar form, described by Dr.
Hansen from Disco Island, was found on Sept. 19, 1900, outside the
Forvisnings Valley.
Order Isopoda.
Suborder Chelifera.
Fam. Tanaide.
12. Heterotanais limicola (HARGER).
Some specimens of this form, also recorded by Dr. Hansen from
the coast of Greenland, were picked up from the bottom-residue of 3
of the bottles.
13. Leptognathia longiremis (LILLJEB.).
A single specimen, apparently belonging to this species, occurred
in a bottle with collections taken on July 18, 1901, from the mouth
of Gaase Fjord.
14. Cryptocope arctica, Hansen.
Three specimens of this distinct species, first described by Dr.
Hansen from Novaja Sembla, were found in the same bottle as the
preceding species.
Suborder Valvifera.
Fam. Arcturide.
15. Arcturus baffini, Sas.
This characteristic arctic form was taken in no less than 12 dif-
ferent places. Among the specimens there are some in which the
dorsal spines are much reduced in size, thus apparently forming a
transilion to the form recorded by the present author under the name
of A. tuberosus.
1898—1902. No. 18.] CRUSTACEA. 9
Fam. Idotheide.
16. Mesidotea Sabini (Kroyer).
A solitary specimen of this form was taken on Aug. 4, 1902, in Gaase
Fjord, north of the peninsula, from a depth of 10—15 fathoms. Accord-
ing to Miss H. Rictarpson, the 2 arctic species Idothea Sabini and
L entomon cannot be referred either to the genus Chiridoiea or to
Glyptonotus, for which reason the new genus Mesidotea has been
established by that distinguished naturalist.
Suborder Asellota.
Fam. Janiride.
17. Janira tricornis (KRoyER).
Some few, more or less mutilated specimens of this arctic species
were picked up from the bottom-residue of 3 or 4 bottles.
Fam. Munnide.
18. Munna Fabricii, Kroyer.
Several specimens of this form were found in the bottom-residue of
5 of the bottles.
19. Munna Kreyeri, Goopsir.
Found together with the preceding species.
Fam. Munnopside.
20. Munnopsis typica, M. Sars.
A single specimen of this characteristic form was taken on Aug. 2,
1901, in the upper part of Gaase Fjord.
91. Eurycope mutica, G. O. Sars.
A few specimens of a small Eurycope, apparently referable to this
species, were picked up from the bottom- residue of a bottle containing
collections taken on July 30, 1900.
10 G. O. SARS. [SEC. ARC, EXP. FRAM
Suborder Hipicarida.
Fam. Dajide.
22. Dajus mysidis, Kroyer.
Found, as usual, attached to the interior of the marsupial pouch
of Mysis oculata (Fasr.).
Order Amphipoda.
Fam. Hyperiide.
23. Hyperia galba (Mont.).
Several specimens of this form, young and adult, were collected
on Aug. 18, 1898, off Cape Sabine.
24. Huthemisto libellula (Manpt.).
Only immature specimens of this common arctic form are in the
collection, these having been taken, as usual, near the surface of the sea.
Fam. Lysianasside.
25. Socarnes bidentatus (Sp. Bate).
Solitary specimens of this magnificent form were taken in 4 dif-
ferent places.
26. Anonyx nugax (Pumps).
Taken in 6 different places.
27. Hoplonyx cicada (Fasr.).
One specimen only of this common form was taken on June 29,
1901, outside the camping-ground.
28. Tryphosa compressa, G. O. Sars.
A solitary. specimen of this form was taken on July 8, 1901, in
Ren Bay, Ellesmere Land.
29. Onesimus Edwardsi (Kroyer).
This form was found occasionally in 4 different places.
1898—1902. No. 18.] CRUSTACEA. 11
30. Pseudalibrotus littoralis (Kroyer).
Several specimens of this common arctic form are in the collection,
these having been taken both at the bottom and near the surface of
the sea.
Fam. Pontoporetide.
31. Pontoporeia femorata, Kroyer.
Some specimens of this form were taken on two different occasions
in the bay in Rice Strait.
Fam. Ampeliscida.
32. Byblis Gaimardi (Kroyer).
Taken occasionally in 4 different places.
33. Haploops tubicola (Livses.).
Several specimens of this form are in the collection, these having
been taken in 5 different places. In one of these localities, the haven
in Rice Strait, it occurred in great abundance.
Fam. Stegocephalide.
34. Stegocephalus inflatus (KRoyYER).
This form occurred in no less than 11 different places, and in one
of them, the bay at Land’s End, it was found in considerable abundance.
Fam. Stenothoide.
35. Metopa Bruzelii (Goés).
Found in great abundance on Hydroida from Rice Strait, and also
found in the bottom-residue of another bottle.
36. Metopa borealis, G. O. Sars.
A solitary specimen of this form was found in the bottom-residue
of a bottle with collections taken on July 18, 1901, at the mouth of
Gaase Fjord, depth about 60 m.
37. Metopa Boecki, G.O. Sars.
Several specimens of this form, not yet known from the arctic
region, were found in the same bottle as the preceding species.
12 G. 0. SARS. [SEC. ARC, EXP. FRAM
38. Metopa carinata, HANsEN.
Of this peculiar form, first described by Dr. Hansen from the west
coast of Greenland, some few specimens were collected on July 27,
1898, at Egedes Minde. Another specimen was found in a bottle of
specimens taken on July 9, 1902, in Ren Bay, Ellesmere Land.
Fam. Amphilochide.
39. Amphilochus manudens, Sp. Bate.
A solitary, somewhat defective specimen of this form occurred in
a bottle of specimens taken on July 30, 1900.
Fam. Oediceride.
40. Paroedicerus lynceus (M. Sars).
Two specimens of this form are in the collection, one taken on
July 30, 1900, the other on July 17, 1902, east of the great glacier,
North Devon.
41. Acanthostepheia Ma/mgreni (Goés).
This large and conspicuous arctic form was found in 5 different
places, in some of them rather abundantly.
Fam. Paramphithoide.
42. Paramphithoe bicuspis (Kroyer).
Three specimens of this form were found on Hydroida taken
on Aug. 24, 1898, in Rice Strait.
Fam. Epimeride.
43. Acanthozone cuspidata (LEPECHIN).
An immature specimen of this characteristic form was taken
on July 30, 1960.
Fam. [phimediidez.
44, Odius carinatus (Sp. Bate).
Solitary specimens of this small, but easily recognisable form were
picked up from the bottom-residue of 2 of the bottles.
1898—1902. No. 18.] CRUSTACEA. 13
Fam. Husiride.
45. Husirus cuspidatus, Kroyer.
A solitary specimen of this arctic form was taken on July 12, 1900,
in the bay at Last End.
46. Rhachotropis aculeata (Lrpecuin).
Some specimens of this characteristic arctic form are in the col-
lection, these having been taken in 3 different places.
Fam. Callioptide.
47. Calliopius Rathkei (Zavpacu).
Several specimens collected on July 31, 1899, off Disco Island.
48. Pontogeneia inermis, Kroyer.
Found occasionally in 2 different places.
49. Amphithopsis glacialis, Hansen.
Some more or less mutilated specimens of this genuine arctic form
are in the collection, these having been taken in 5 different places, in
some cases near the surface of the sea.
Fam. Atylidee.
50. Atylus carinatus (Fapr.).
This characteristic arctic form was taken in no less than 16 diffe-
rent places, in some of them rather abundantly.
Fam. Gammaride.
51. Gammarus locusta Lin.
Collected in 7 different places, in one of them very abundantly.
52. Amathilla homari (Far.).
Several specimens of this form were secured, having been found
in 5 different places.
14 G. 0. SARS. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
53. Amathilla pingvis (Kroyer).
This genuine arctic form was also taken in several places.
54. Gammaracanthus loricatus (Sas.).
Magnificent specimens of this characteristic form were taken from
5 different places.
Fam. Photide.
55. Protomedeia fasciata, Kroyer.
Only a single specimen of this form was found in a bottle of
specimens taken on Aug. 2, 1901, in the upper part of Gaase Fjord.
Fam. Podoceride.
56. Jschyrocerus angvipes (KRoyYER).
Four specimens of this common arctic form were taken on July 17,
1902, east of the large glacier, North Devon, from a depth of about
3 fathoms.
57. Ischyrocerus minutus (LILLJEs.).
Very common on Hydroida taken on Aug. 24, 1898, in Rice Strait
from a depth of 4—20 fathoms; also found occasionally in 2 other places.
Fam. Corophiide.
58. Neohela monstrosa, Borcx.
A solitary, somewhat mutilated specimen of this peculiar form was
taken on Aug. 2, 1901.
Fam. Caprellide.
59. gina spinosissima (Stmps).
Taken occasionally in 5 different places.
60. Caprella septentrionalis, Kroyer.
Several specimens of this common arctic species were taken on
Aug. 4, 1898, at Upernivik.
4898—1902. No. 18.| CRUSTACEA, 15
Order Branchiopoda.
Suborder Phyllopoda.
Fam. Apodide.
61. Lepidurus arcticus (Pautas).
This arctic form was collected on Aug. 16, 1898, from fresh-water
swamps on Faulke Fjord.
62. Lepidurus apus (Lin).
Two specimens of this species, which has not yet been recorded
from the arctic region, were taken on Aug. 29, 1898, from a fresh-
water swamp at Cape Rutherford.
Fam. Branchipodide.
63. Branchinecta paludosa (Mi.ver).
Found in several places, both in fresh and brackish water.
Suborder Cladocera.
Fam. Daphnide.
64. Daphnia pulex (De GEER).
Numerous dark-coloured specimens of this form, most of them with
ephippia, occurred in a sample taken on Aug. 22, 1898, from a fresh-
water pond (the exact locality not indicated).
Fam. Polyphemide.
65. ELvadne Nordmani, LovEn.
Abundant in a plankton-sample taken on June 29, 1898, in lat.
57°31 N., long. 1° 29’ E.
16 G. 0. SARS. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
Order Copepoda.
Suborder Calanoida.
Fam. Calanide.
66. Calanus finmarchicus (GUNNER.).
This common species occurred abundantly in plankton-samples from
many different places.
67. Calanus hyperboreus, Kroyer.
Found occasionally together with the preceding species.
Fam. Eucheetide.
68. Euchzeta norvegica, Borck.
Some immature specimens of this form occurred in one of the
plankton-samples taken on July 10, 1898.
Fam. Stephide.
69. Stephos arcticus, G. O. Sars, n. sp.
(Pl. 1)
Specific Characters. — Female. Body somewhat more slender
than in the other known species, with the anterior division oblong oval
in form, greatest width not attaining half the length. Last pedigerous
segment not wholly confluent with the preceding one, a slight notch on
each side indicating the limit between the two; lateral lobes rounded
off and slightly unequal, the right one somewhat more prominent than
the left. Urosome slender and narrow, attaining almost half the length
of the anterior division, genital segment slightly asymmetrical, bulging
somewhat on left side. Caudal rami about the length of the last seg-
ment, apical sete rather slender, the innermost but one much the
longest, and attaining about half the length of the body. Anterior an-
tennz shorter than the anterior division of the body, and, as in the
other species, composed of 24 articulations. Posterior antennee, oral
parts and natatory legs of the structure characteristic of the genus.
Last pair of legs extremely small, with the distal joint conical in form
and scarcely denticulated.
Male somewhat smaller than female and of more slender form,
with the urosome narrower and 5-articulate, 2nd segment the largest
1898-1902. No. 18. CRUSTACEA. 17
and produced below to a conical recurved projection. Anterior antennze
of exactly the same structure as in female. Last pair of legs, however,
very different and greatly developed, being built on the type character-
istic of the genus; right leg more slender than left, and consisting of
4 joints, the penultimate one long and slender, sublinear in form, and
produced at the end outside to a conical projection, terminal joint
divided into 3 unequal lappets, the middle one the largest and some-
what spoon-shaped; left leg angularly bent in front of the middle, and
distinctly 5-articulate, penultimate joint large and tumid, oval in form,
and provided at the base inside with a slender spiniform appendage,
outside which another much smaller projection occurs, lower face pro-
vided, in front of the middle, with a rounded projecting tubercle, ter-
minal joint somewhat club-shaped, and provided at the end outside with
about 6 lanceolate, leaf-like appendages, tip rounded off and fringed
with a comb-like series of delicate, somewhat compressed spinules.
Length of adult female 1.20 mm., of male 1.05 mm.
Remarks. — In its external appearance this form somewhat
resembles S. Scotti, G.O. Sars, but is of larger size and more slender
shape. It also differs conspicuously both from this and the other known
species in the structure of the last pair of legs in both sexes.
Occurrence. — One female and 2 male specimens of this form
were found in a bottle containing specimens taken on July 12, 1900, in
the bay at Land’s End.
Fam. Centropagide.
70. Centropages hamatus (LILLEB.).
Found rather abundantly in a plankton-sample taken on June 29,
1898, in lat. 57° 31’ N., long. 1° 29’ E.
Fam. Temoride.
71. Temora Jongicornis (Mit1.).
Found in the same sample in which the preceding species occurred.
Fam. Pontellide.
72. Anomalocera Patersoni (TEMpLt.).
Several specimens of this characteristic Atlantic form occurred in
the same sample as the 2 preceding species.
18
G. O. SARS. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
Fam. Acartiide.
73. Acartia Clausi, GIESBRECHT.
Together with the 3 preceding species.
Suborder Harpacticoida.
Fam. Misophriidex.
74. Misophria pallida, Boxcx.
Several specimens of this peculiar form were picked up from the
bottom-residue of 4 different bottles.
It has also been recorded by Dr.
Tu. Scott from Franz Josef Land.
Fam. Hctinosomide.
75, Ectinosoma neglectum, G. O. Sars.
Not unfrequent in the bottom-residue of several bottles.
76. Ectinosoma melaniceps, Bokcx.
Together with the preceding species, rather common.
77. Bradya typica, Boeck.
Some few specimens of this form were found in 2 of the bottles
78. Microsetella norvegica (Borck).
This form occurred in great abundance in a plankton-sample taken
on July 10, 1898. 2 specimens were also found in a bottle with
collections taken on June 26, 1899, in the Winter haven.
Fam. Harpacticide.
79. Harpacticus chelifer (Miutrr).
A solitary specimen of this species was taken on July 27, 1898,
in the haven of Egedes Minde.
80. Harpacticus uniremis, Kroyer.
Found rather frequently in 5 different bottles.
1898—1902. No. 18.] CRUSTACEA. 19
81. Zaus spinatus, Goopstr.
This form also occurred in 5 different bottles. The specimens
agreed, perfectly, both in size and in their structural details with the
form occurring off the Norwegian coast.
82. Zaus Aurelii, Poppe.
(Pl. Il, figs. 1—6).
Zaus Aurelii, Poppe, Ueber die von Herrn Dr. Arruur and AureL Krause
im nordlichen stillen Ocean und Behringsmeer gesammelten Copepoden.
Arch. f. Naturgesch. 50. Jahrg. 1. Vol. p. 286, Pl. XX, figs. 7—9, Pl. XXI,
figs. 5— 15.
Specific Characters. — Female. Body somewhat less ex-
panded than in the type species, the anterior division being oblong
oval in form, with the cephalic segment evenly rounded in front.
Rostral projection semicircular, deflexed. Urosome, as in the type
species, much narrower than the anterior division, lateral expansions
of the segments not much produced. Anterior anlenne comparatively
shorter than in Z. spinatus, otherwise of a very similar structure.
Posterior antennz and oral parts as in that species. ist pair of legs
with the rami comparatively less robust, and the apical claws less
thickly clothed with cilia. Natatory legs likewise somewhat more
slender in shape. Last pair of legs with the distal joint oblong in
form, more than twice as long as it is broad, and somewhat tapered
at the end, inner expansion of proximal joint triangularly produced.
Ovisac oblong oval in form, with only a limited number of. ova.
Length of adult female 0.72 mm.
Remarks. — This form is closely related to Z. spinatus Goopsir,
but is of considerably larger size, and has the anterior division of the
body somewhat less expanded. The several appendages are on the
whole very similar to those in the type species, though on a closer
comparison, some slight differences may be found to occur. The last
pair of legs especially differ conspicuously in the narrower shape of
the distal joint and the more produced inner expansion of the proxi-
mal joint.
Occurrence. — Some specimens of this form were found together
with the preceding species in 3 of the bottles.
Distribution. — The Pacific in lat. 55°56’ N, long. 154° 7’ W,
on Laminaria and Macrocystis floating at the surface (Poppe); Novaja
Semlja (Scort).
20 G. 0. SARS. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
83. Zaus abbreviatus, G. O. Sars.
This form, as yet only known from the Norwegian coast, was
found occasionally together with the preceding species.
84. Zaus Goodsiri, Brapy.
Two specimens only of this large and distinct species were found.
Fam. Porcellidiide.
85. Porcellidium fimbriatum, Cuaus.
A solitary specimen of this easily recognisable form was found in
a bottle of specimens taken on July 9, 1901.
Fam. Idyide.
86. Psamathe Arthuri (Poppe).
(Pl. Ul, figs. 7—11).
Stutellidium Arthuri, Porpz, |. c. p. 291, Pl. XXI, figs. 1-4, Pl. XXU,
figs. 1-12.
Specific Characters. — Female. Anterior division of body
broad and depressed, with the lateral parts of the segments lamellarly
expanded and angular behind. Cephalic segment about the length of
the 4 succeeding segments combined, rostral projection broad and
lamellar, obtusely truncated at the end. Penultimate segment of meta-
some scarcely narrower than the preceding ones, and having the hind
edge almost straight. Last pedigerous segment, as in the type species,
very small and firmly connected with the 1st caudal segment. Uro-
some comparatively shorter than in the type species, being scarcely
more than 1/3; as long as the anterior division, genital segment some-
what dilated and much larger than the others. Caudal sete slender
and elongated, the innermost but one almost as long as the whole body.
Anterior antenne resembling in structure those in P. longicauda, the
terminal part tapering abruptly, with the last 2 joints narrow linear
in form. Posterior antenne and oral parts exhibiting the structure
characteristic of the genus. 1st pair of legs almost exactly as in the
type species. Natatory legs likewise very similar. Last pair of legs,
however, differing more conspicuously, the distal joint being compara-
tively shorter and less densely setous on the edge, tip obliquely
truncated.
Length of adult female 1.32 mm.
1898—1902. No. 18.] CRUSTACEA. at
Remarks. — This form is very nearly related to P. longicauda
Puiuipe1 (= Scutellidium thisboides Claus), but is of rather larger size
and differs slightly in the general shape of the body, as also in the
structure of the last pair of legs. The form recorded by Tu. Scott
from Franz Josef Land as Scutelldium thisboides Cus. is in all pro-
babilily the present species and not that of Craus.
Occurrence. — A single fully adult female specimen and some
immature ones of this form were found in a bottle of specimens taken
on July 12, 1908, in the bay at Land’s End.
Distribution. — Northern part of the Pacific together with Zaus
Aurelii (Poppe); Franz Josef Land (Scott).
87. Machairopus minutus, G. O. Sars.
Some specimens of this form, described by the present author from
the Norwegian coast, were found in 3 of the bottles.
88. Jdyxa furcata (Bairp).
Found rather abundantly in several of the bottles.
89. Idy#a ensifera (FIscHER).
Several specimens of this form were also found in the bottles.
90. Idy#a gracilis, Scott.
Only a few specimens of this form were found in one of the bottles
containing specimens taken on July 12, 1900, in the bay at Land’s End.
91. Idyea finmarchica, G. O. Sars.
Of this species, described by the present author from the Finmark
coast, a solitary female specimen was found in the same bottle as
the preceding species.
92. Idyea inflata, G. O. Sars, n. sp.
(Pl. III).
Specific Characters. — Female. Body comparatively short
and stout, sub-pyriform in outline, with the anterior division greatly in-
flated in its anterior part. Cephalic segment large and broad, obtusely
rounded in front, with the rostral projection very slight. Epimeral parts
1 By this slight change (the interposition of an c) I think that the Philippian
genus may be retained. The name Idya had been previously given by
Buainvitte to a genus of Acalephe. :
22 G. 0. SARS. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
of the 8 succeeding segments rounded and sub-contiguous; penultimate
segment deeply emarginated behind. Last pedigerous segment very
small. Urosome much narrower than the anterior division and scarcely
attaining half its length, genital segment, as usual, much the largest;
last segment very short. Caudal rami likewise short, broader than they
are long. and transversely truncated at the end; apical sete unusually
short and less unequal than in the other species, the inner medial seta
but little longer than the outer, and scarcely exceeding the urosome in
length, being remarkably dilated for the greater part of its length; inner-
most seta longer than the outermost, both very thin. Anterior antenne
comparatively short, with the 2nd joint much the largest, the 2 suc-
ceeding joints gradually smaller, terminal part about twice the length of
the preceding joint. Posterior antenne rather small, but otherwise of
normal structure. Mandibular palp with the inner ramus shorter and
stouter than the outer. Anterior maxillipeds with the terminal claw
very strong and abruptly bent at the tip, appendicular lobe extremely
small with only a single minute bristle at the tip. Posterior maxillipeds
comparatively more powerful than in the other species. ist pair of
legs exhibiting the structure characteristic of the genus, outer ramus
exceeding half the length of the inner, and having the penicillate spines
comparatively thin, inner ramus with the 1st joint rather dilated, 2nd
joint not much narrowed and scarcely longer than the 1st, last joint
very small, with 2 unequal claws at the tip, the inner one much the
larger and distinctly penicillate. Natatory legs very fully developed,
with the rami, especially those of the anterior pairs, rather broad and
subequal in length; those of 4th pair, however, rather more slender. Last
pair of legs not much produced, distal joint lamellar, oblong oval in
form, and provided at the end with 4 comparatively short sete, inner
expansion of proximal joint short, triangular, and tipped with 2 unequal
sete. Ovisac oblong in form, and extending considerably beyond the
tip of the caudal rami. .
Male, as usual, much smaller and more slender than female, and
having the anterior antenne slightly transformed, subprehensile. Last
pair of legs very small, with the inner expansion of the proximal joint
quite obsolete. Genital lobes each with a strong spine and two small
hair-like bristles.
Length of adult female about 1 mm.
Remarks. — This is a very distinct and easily recognisable species,
being especially distinguished by the greatly inflated anterior division of
the body and the unusually short caudal sete.
1898— 1902. No. 18.] CRUSTACEA. 93
Occurrence. — Several specimens of this form were found in
the bottom-residue of 4 different bottles. In one of them, containing
specimens taken on July 30, 1900, it occurred rather plentifully.
93. Idyanthe! dilatata, G. O. Sars.
One or two specimens of this peculiar form occurred in a bottle
of specimens taken on July 12, 1900, in the bay at Land’s End.
Fam. Thalestridez.
94. Thalestris gibba (Kroyer).
This form occurred occasionally in a bottle of specimens taken
on July 17, 1902, east of the great glacier, North Devon, from a depth
of about 3 fathoms.
95. Phyllothalestris frigida (Scott).
(Pl. 1V).
Thalestris frigida, Tu. Scotr, Marine and fresh water Crustacea from
Franz Josef Land. Linn. Soc. Journ. Zoology. Vol. XXVIII, p. 108, Pl. 7,
figs. 1728, Pl. 8, figs. 1, 2.
Specific Characters. — Female. Body comparatively strongly
built, with the integuments highly chitinized. Cephalic segment large
and deep, somewhat narrowed in its anterior part, and produced in
front to a strong falciform deflexed rostrum terminating in a very acute
point. Epimeral parts of the 3 succeeding segments less deep than in
the type species, but terminating behind in a sharp angle. Last pedige-
rous segment short, but rather broad, with the lateral parts somewhat
produced. Urosome not much narrower than the anterior division and
somewhat exceeding half its length, genital segment broader than it is
long, and somewhat depressed, exhibiting on each side, like the 2
succeeding segments, an obliquely transverse row of small denticles.
Last segment well developed, though a little shorter than the preceding
one. Caudal rami short, being scarcely longer than they are broad,
and somewhat obliquely truncated at the tip, middle apical sete rather
slender, the inner one being, as usual, the longer. Anterior antenne
1 The name Idyopsis having been previously given by Prof. A. Acassiz to a
genus of Acalephz, I propose the above change of the generic name.
24 G. 0. SARS. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
scarcely exceeding half the length of the cephalic segment and rather
densely setiferous, 1st joint much the largest, 2nd joint nearly as long |
as the 2 succeeding joints combined, terminal part rather narrow and
about half the length of the proximal one. Posterior antenne and
oral parts of the structure characteristic of the genus. Posterior maxilli-
peds, as in the type species much less robust than in the genus Tha-
lestris, the hand being narrow fusiform in shape, with the palmar
edge nearly straight. 1st pair of legs with both rami rather slender
and distinctly prehensile, the outer one a little longer than the inner,
and having the 2nd joint long and slender, last joint small and armed
with 2 strong subequal claws accompanied by a slender seta, outer
edge of the joint moreover carrying 2 comparatively small spines; inner
ramus with the outer 2 joints very short, the last one armed with a
long slightly curved claw, outside which is a much thinner setiform
spine. Natatory legs of normal structure. Last pair of legs very largely
developed, though scarcely to such an extent as in the type species,
extending about to the end of the 2nd caudal segment, both joints pro-
nouncedly foliaceous, the distal one oblong oval in form and provided
with 4 thickish, coarsely ciliated seta, 3 of which are attached to the
outer edge, the 4th to the inner edge near the end, the tip itself carry-
ing 2 unequal very thin, hair-like bristles; inner expansion of proximal
joint extending as far as the distal joint and broadly rounded at the
end, marginal sete 5 in number, the innermost not far remote from
the others.
Male considerably smaller than female and exhibiting the usual
sexual differences. 1st pair of legs with the spine attached to the inner
corner of the 2nd basal joint falciform, incurved. Inner ramus of 2nd
pair of legs transformed in a similar manner to that in the type
species. Last pair of legs much smaller than in female, with the inner
expansion of proximal joint quite short, and provided with only 3 sete.
Length of adult female 1.30 mm.
Remarks. — This form has been described and figured, though
somewhat imperfectly, by Tx. Scorr in the above-quoted paper as a
species of the genus Thalestris. According to the general form of the
body, the shape of the rostrum, the structure of the posterior maxilli-
peds and the great development of the last pair of legs, it is undoubt-
edly referable to the genus Phyllothalestris, as defined by the present
author in his account of the Norwegian Harpacticoida. It is distinguished
from the type species, P. mysis CLaus, by a number of well-marked
characters pointed out in the above diagnosis.
1898—1902. No. 18.] CRUSTACEA. 95
Occurrence. — One female and 2 male specimens of this pretty
form were found in a bottle of specimens taken on July 10, 1901, at the
mouth of Gaase Fjord from a depth of about 60 m.
Distribution. — Franz Josef Land (Scort).
96. Rhynchothalestris helgolandica (Cavs).
Found occasionally in 2 of the bottles.
97. Microthalestris forficula (Cuavs).
This form occurred not unfrequently in 7 different bottles.
98. Dactylopusia vulgaris, G. O. Sars.
Not uncommon in several places.
99. Dactylopusia glacialis, G. O. Sars, n. sp.
(Pl. V).
Specific Characters. — Female. Body moderately slender
and slightly tapering behind, with the anterior division oval in form and
not much dilated anteriorly. Cephalic segment exceeding in length the
4 succeeding segments combined; rostral projection slightly prominent
and obtuse at the tip. Urosome about 2/; as long as the anterior
division, and having the segments rather sharply defined. Caudal rami
very short, being twice as broad as they are long, and transversely
truncated at the end; middle apical sete rather slender. Anterior an-
tenn comparatively short, though distinctly 9-articulate, terminal part
about the length of the 3 preceding joints combined. Posterior antenne
and oral parts of normal structure. ist pair of legs rather strongly
built, with both rami distinctly prehensile, the outer one nearly as long
as the 1st joint of the inner, last joint short, spatulate in form, with
all 4 claws well-developed and gradually increasing in length distally,
inner ramus with the 2 outer joints, as usual, very short and abruptly
incurved, the last one armed with 2 very strong claws of unequal
length, seta of ist joint attached about in the middle. Natatory legs
of the usual structure. Last pair of legs comparatively large and pro-
nouncedly foliaceous, distal joint very broad, rounded in shape, and
scarcely exserted at the tip; inner expansion of proximal joint almost
extending as far as the distal joint, 2 of the sete on each joint very
slender and elongated.
Male, as usual, smaller than female, and having the anterior an-
tenne distinctly hinged. Inner ramus of 2nd pair of legs with the
26 G. 0. SARS. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
distal joint considerably narrowed in its outer part, spine of outer edge
unusually short and attached beyond the middle, tip provided with a
small spine and a long flexuous seta. Last pair of legs with the distal
joint rather small, inner expansion of proximal joint well developed,
but provided with only 3 short sete.
Length of adult female about 1 mm.
Remarks. — This form is nearly allied to D. vulgaris, but is of
considerably larger size, in which respect it about equals D. thisboides
Ciaus. From both these species it is distinguished by the very broad
rounded form of the distal joint of the last pair of legs in the female,
as also by the more strongly built 1st pair of legs. From D. thisboides
it moreover differs by the distinctly 9-articulate anterior antenne. The
structure of the inner ramus of the 2nd pair of legs in the male differs
also conspicuously from that in the 2 species mentioned.
Occurrence. — This form was found rather abundantly in a
bottle of specimens taken on July 30, 1900 (the exact locality not indi-
cated). It also occurred occasionally in some of the other bottles.
100. Dactylopusia brevicornis, Cts.
Some specimens of this distinct species occurred in a bottle of
specimens taken on July 12, 1900, in the bay at Land’s End.
101. Zdomene coronata (Scott).
(Pl. VI).
Dactylopus coronatus, Tu. Scort, Additions to the Fauna of the Firth of
Forth. 12th. Ann. Rep. of Fish. Board for Scotland, Part ILI, p. 255,
Pl. IX, figs. 12—90.
Specific Characters. — Female. Body short and stout, pro-
nouncedly depressed, with the anterior division broad and expanded,
oval in outline. Cephalic segment large and evenly rounded in front,
rostral projection somewhat deflexed, lamellar, obtusely rounded at the
tip. Epimeral plates of the 3 succeeding segments sub-imbricate and
acutely produced at the hind corner. Last pedigerous segment much
narrower than the preceding ones, and without distinct epimeral plates.
Urosome short, scarcely more than 1/3 as long as the anterior division,
and much narrower, genital segment, as usual, the largest and, like
the 2 succeeding segments, finely spinulose at the hind edge laterally.
Caudal rami scarcely longer than they are broad, and spinulose at
the inner corner, innermost apical seta not spiniform and shorter than
the outermost, the 2 middle sete slender and elongated. Anterior
antenne short and stout, 7-articulate, and densely clothed with sete,
1898-1902. No. 18.| CRUSTACEA. 97
some of which are rather coarse and spinulose at the edges, terminal
part 3-articulate and scarcely longer than the 2 preceding joints com-
bined. Posterior antenne of a similar structure to that in the type species.
Mandibular palp, however, less fully developed, with the rami shorter,
none of the sete of the outer ramus spiniform. Posterior maxillipeds
rather strong, with an oblique series of small spinules crossing the base
of the hand. 1st pair of legs built on the same type as in L. forficata
Puiuirrl, though having the 1st joint of the inner ramus less dilated
and the outer 2 joints more produced, exceeding, when combined, half
the length of the 1st. Natatory legs scarcely different in structure from
those in the type species. Last pair of legs, however, rather unlike,
distal joint confluent at the base with the proximal one and broadly
rounded at the end, marginal sete 5 in number, the 2 outermost re-
markably strong and curved, spiniform, and edged outside with coarse
cilia, the other 3 sete long and slender; inner expansion of proximal
joint extending as far as the distal joint and obtusely truncated at the
end, carrying 5 rather unequal sete, the outermost but one very long
and slender, the innermost but one quite short. Ovisac comparatively
large, extending far beyond the tip of the caudal rami, and oval in form.
Length of adult female 0.66 mm.
Remarks. — This is certainly not a Dactylopusia, as believed by
Tu. Scorr, but seems to me more properly to be referable to the genus
Idomene of Putuiprt, though differing from the type species, L. forficata
rather conspicuously in some points, especially as regards the structure
of the mandibular palp, the last pair of legs and the caudal sete.
Occurrence. — A solitary female specimen of this form was
found in a bottle of specimens taken on July 18, 1901, at the mouth
of Gaase Fjord from a depth of about 60 m.
Distribution. — Scottish coast (Scor7).
102. Amenophia peltata, Borcx.
Some few specimens of this easily recognizable form occurred in 3
of the bottles examined.
103. Westwoodia assimilis, G. O. Sars.
A solitary specimen of a moderately large Westwoodia, which
according to the distinctly bi-articulate outer ramus of the ist pair of
legs, must be referred to the above species described by the present
author from the Norwegian coast, was found in a bottle of specimens
taken on July 12, 1900, in the bay at Land’s End.
28 G. 0. SARS. [SEC. ARC, EXP, FRAM
Fam. Diosaccide.
104. Amphiascus nasutus, Boeck.
This form occurred rather abundantly in several of the bottles.
105. Amphiascus latifolius, G. O. Sars, n. sp.
(Pl. VIL).
Specific Characters. — Female. Body moderately slender
and slightly tapering behind, with the anterior division oblong oval in
form. Cephalic segment, excluding the rostrum, about the length of
the 3 succeeding segments combined; rostrum well developed, lanceolate.
Urosome somewhat shorter than the anterior division, last segment
comparatively short, scarcely half as long as the preceding one. Caudal
rami broader than they are long, and transversely truncated at the tip,
inner medial seta conspicuously dilated for some part of its length,
and about as long as the urosome. Anterior antennz of moderate
length and consisting of 9 well-defined articulations, the first four gra-
dually diminishing in size, terminal part about half the length of the
proximal one. Posterior antenne and oral parts of the usual structure.
1st pair of legs with both rami pronouncedly prehensile and rather
slender, the outer one fully as long as the 1st joint of the inner, last
joint very short, spatulate in form, and armed with 3 strong claws gra-
dually increasing in length distally and accompanied outside by a thin
bristle, inside by a slender geniculate seta; inner ramus with the 1st
joint linear in form and having inside, at a short distance from the end,
a comparatively short seta, outer 2 joints very short and subequal in
size, the last one armed with 2 slender claws of unequal length. Nata-
tory legs well developed, with the full number of sete. Last pair of
legs comparatively large and pronouncedly foliaceous, distal joint of
unusual size, rounded quadrangular in form, and provided with 6 rather
slender sete, one of them, issuing from the tip, very thin, hair-like;
inner expansion of proximal joint triangular and extending about to the
middle of the distal joint, marginal sete 5 in number, the 2 outermost
closely juxtaposed. Ovisacs of moderate size and oblong oval in form.
Male with the anterior antenne hinged in the usual manner.
Inner ramus of 2nd pair of legs conspicuously transformed, but rather
unlike that in the other known species, middle joint faintly defined from
the last, and without any spiniform appendage outside, last joint pro-
vided at the tip with a short spine and a slender seta, having more-
over inside an ordinary seta, and outside near the end a short, peculiarly
~ 4908—1902. No. 18.] CRUSTACEA. 99
formed spine originating with a broad lamellar base. Last pair of legs,
as usual, much smaller than in female, distal joint oval in form and
somewhat narrowed towards the end; inner expansion of proximal joint
rounded off at the end, and provided with only 2 unequal sete.
Length of adult female 0.92 mm.
Remarks. — This species belongs to the section of the genus in
which both rami of the 1st pair of legs are distinctly prehensile and
built upon a type somewhat similar to that in the genus Dactylopusia.
It is, however, quite distinct from any of the known species. In only
one of these, A. nasutus, Borcx, are the anterior antenne composed,
as in the present species, of 9 articulations; but from this species
it differs conspicuously both in the greater length of the outer ramus
of the ist pair of legs, and in the shape of the distal joint of the last
pair of legs in the female. .
Occurrence. — This well-marked species was found not unfre-
quently in 3 of the bottles examined.
106. Amphiascus minutus (Cavs).
Some few specimens of a small Amphiascus, apparently belonging
to this species, were found together with the preceding one.
107. Amphiascus congener, G. O. Sars, n. sp.
(Pl. VIII, figs. 1—4).
Specific Characters. — Female. Body rather slender, almost
cylindrical in form, or only very slightly attenuated behind. Rostrum of
moderate size and somewhat obtusely pointed at the tip. Urosome
nearly attaining the length of the anterior division, last segment a little
shorter than the preceding one. Caudal rami of a similar form to that
in A. latifolius, inner medial seta somewhat obliquely dilated at the
base and scarcely longer than the urosome. Anterior antenne of mode-
rate length and, as usual, composed of 8 articulations, 4th joint longer
than 38rd, terminal part not attaining half the length of the proximal
one. ist pair of legs with the rami less pronouncedly prehensile than
in A. latifolius and very unequal, the outer one being scarcely more
than half as long as the inner, last joint nearly as long as the middle
one and armed with 3 claw-like spines, and inside these with 2 genicu-
lated setee; inner ramus with the 1st joint long and slender, carrying
inside near the end a short seta, the 2 outer joints somewhat unequal
in size, the last one being about twice as long as the preceding one and
30 G. O. SARS. [SEC. ARC, EXP, FRAM
armed at the tip with a slender claw and a still longer seta accom-
panied by a small bristle. Natatory legs normal. Last pair of legs of
moderate size, distal joint obovate in form, with 6 not very long mar-
ginal sete; inner expansion of proximal joint triangular, and scarcely
extending to the middle of the distal joint, marginal sete 5 in number.
Length of adult female 0.87 mm.
Remarks. — In its general form this species somewhat resembles
A. similis (CLaus). It is, however, of smaller size and moreover differs
conspicuously in the structure of the first and last pairs of legs.
Occurrence. — Some few specimens of this form occurred in a
bottle of specimens taken on July 30, 1900 (the exact locality not indicated).
108. Amphiascus polaris, G. O. Sars, n. sp.
(PI. VII, figs. 5—10).
Specific Characters. — Female. Body less slender than
in the preceding species and of nearly uniform width throughout.
Rostrum considerably prominent and exserted to a very acute point.
Urosome not attaining the length of the anterior division, last segment
searcely shorter than the preceding one, and deeply incised behind.
Caudal rami short and rather distant, inner medial seta slightly dilated
at the base and nearly twice as long as the urosome. Anterior an-
tenn rather slender, 8-articulate, with the 4th joint much longer than
3rd, terminal part about equalling in length those joints combined.
1st pair of legs with the rami very unequal, the outer one scarcely
exceeding half the length of the inner, and having all 3 joints of about
equal size, the last one, as in A: congener, armed with 3 spines and
2 geniculated sete; inner ramus with the 1st joint very slender and
slightly curved, seta attached inside its end unusually long, outer 2
joints very unequal, the last one being almost 3 times as long as the
other and linear in form, carrying on the tip a slender, evenly curved
claw and a still longer seta accompanied by a small bristle. Natatory
legs with the rami more slender than in the preceding species, other-
wise of normal structure. Last pair of legs somewhat resembling those
in A. congener, distal joint, however, less dilated, and oblong in form;
inner expansion of proximal joint extending to about the middle of the
distal joint, and having the 2 innermost setae comparatively short and
spiniform. Ovisacs oblong oval in form, and containing only a limited
number of ova.
Male with the inner ramus of 2nd pair of legs transformed in the
usual manner, the 2 outer joints, being wholly coalesced, outer edge
1898—1902. No. 18. CRUSTACEA. 31
carrying at some distance from the tip a strong deflexed spiniform
appendage accompanied by another much thinner appendage. Last pair
of legs very small, distal joint quite short, with only 5 sete, 2 of them
attached to the inner edge; inner expansion of proximal joint tipped
with 2 unequal sete.
Length of adult female 0.77 mm.
Remarks. — The present form is easily distinguishable from
the preceding species and also different from any other species known
to me. In the shape of the rostrum and the ist pair of legs it some-
what resembles A. imus (Brapy); but the body is far less slender, and
the structure of the last pair of legs is also very different.
Occurrence. — Several specimens of this form occurred in a
bottle of specimens taken on July 12, 1900, in the bay at Land’s End.
109. Amphiascus brevis, G. O. Sars, n. sp.
(Pl. VIII, figs. 11-15).
Specific Characters. — Female. Body unusually short and
stout, with the anterior division slightly dilated in the middle and some-
what narrowed both in front and behind. Rostrum of moderate size
and obtusely pointed at the tip. Urosome considerably shorter than
the anterior division, with the last segment about the length of the pre-
ceding one. Caudal rami broader than they are long, inner medial
seta conspicuously dilated at the base and not quite twice as long as
the urosome. Anterior antenne rather slender, 8-articulate, with the
Ath joint longer than the 3rd, terminal part about half the length of the
proximal one. 1st pair of legs with the outer ramus exceeding half
the length of the inner, and having the last joint about as long as the
middle one, its armature as in the 2 preceding species; inner ramus
with the 1st joint long and slender, seta of inner edge comparatively
short, outer 2 joints less unequal than in A. polaris, the last one being
only slightly longer than the other, and armed at the tip with a mode-
rately slender, almost straight claw and a long seta accompanied by a
small bristle. Natatory legs normal. Last pair of legs comparatively
smaller than in the preceding species, distal joint narrow oval in form
and somewhat exserted at the end, marginal sete 7 in number, 2 of
them being attached to the inner edge; inner expansion of proximal
joint extending to about the middle of the distal joint and carrying
5 sete. Ovisacs about as in A. polaris.
Length of adult female 0.52 mm.
32 G. O. SARS. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
Remarks. — This form is chiefly distinguished by its unusually
short and stout body, as also by the increased number of sete on the
distal joint of the last pair of legs. It belongs to the smaller species
of the present genus.
Occurrence. — Some specimens of this form were found in
bottles from 3 different places.
110. Amphiascus hispidus (Norman).
Found occasionally in 2 of the bottles examined.
111. Amphiascus affinis, G. O. Sars.
This form occurred, though only sparingly, in no less than 4 diffe-
rent places.
112. Amphiascus intermedius (Scott).
A solitary specimen of this form, easily recognizable by the un-
usually short and thick caudal sete, was found in a bottle of speci-
mens taken on July 9, 1901, in Ren Bay, Ellesmere Land.
118. Amphiascus typhlops, G. O. Sars.
Of this peculiar form, also only a single specimen was found. It
occurred in the same bottle as the preceding species.
114. Stenhelia gibba, Borck.
Found occasionally in 2 of the bottles.
115. Stenhelia palustris (Brapy).
A solitary female specimen of this form occurred in a bottle of
specimens taken on July 12, 1900, in the bay at Land’s End.
Fam. Canthocamptide.
116. Cantocamptus Nordenskjéldi, Lu.ses.
(PI. IX).
Canthocamptus Nordenskjéldi, Litusesorc, Three species nove generis
Canthocampti: Appendix to K. Svenska Vetensk. Akad. Handl. Vol. 28,
No. 9, p. 8, Pl. I, fig. 7, Pl. II, figs. 1—7.
Specific Characters. — Female. Body rather slender, sub-
cylindrical in form, with the anterior division only slightly wider than
the posterior. Cephalic segment about the length of the 3 succeeding
1898-1902. No. 18.] CRUSTACEA. 33
ones combined and evenly rounded in front, rostral projection very
slight, almost obsolete. Urosome nearly as long as the anterior
division, segments finely spinulose at the hind edge ventrally and late-
rally, last segment almost as long as the preceding one, but somewhat
narrower, anal opercle perfectly smooth. Caudal rami comparatively
short and obliquely oval in form, with the outer edge very convex,
almost angular in the middle, the inner nearly straight, tip obtusely
rounded, dorsal face with a slight carina running along the proximal
part as far as the small dorsal seta, and followed by a row of 4 rather
strong denticles extending to the inner corner; outermost apical seta
attached at some distance from the other three, apparently to the
outer edge, seta of this edge attached considerably in front of the
middle; outer medial seta somewhat bent outwards at the base, and
about half as long as the inner, which about equals in length the uro-
some and last pedigerous segment combined. Anterior antenne rather
slender, though not attaining the length of the cephalic segment, 8-arti-
culate, and only sparingly setiferous, terminal part about the length of
the proximal one. Posterior antenne and oral parts exhibiting the
structure characteristic of the genus. ist pair of legs moderately slender,
outer ramus a little longer than the Ist joint of the inner, its last joint
exceeding in length the middle one, and carrying on the tip 2 slender
spines and 2 geniculate sete; inner ramus with the 1st joint a little
longer than the outer 2 combined, and having inside, at a short distance
from the end, a comparatively short seta, last joint more than twice as
long as the preceding one, sub-linear in form, and carrying on the tip
a slender claw and a long seta. Natatory legs with the rami less
slender than in the type species, but otherwise of a very similar struc-
ture. Last pair of legs with the distal joint comparatively small, oval
in form, and armed with 5 marginal sete, one of which, issuing from
the tip, is very thin, hair-like, the others rather coarse and spinulose at
the edges; inner expansion of proximal joint rather large, lamellar, ex-
tending almost as far as the distal joint, and broadly rounded at the end,
which carries 6 coarse spinulose sete of somewhat unequal length.
Male with the anterior antennz hinged in the usual manner. Inner
ramus of 2nd pair of legs with the 2 outer joints wholly coalesced; that
of 3rd pair very conspicuously transformed, 3-articulate, 1st joint short,
projecting outside in an acute corner and carrying inside a small bristle;
2nd joint likewise short, but produced inside to a long deflexed process
terminating in a thin setiform point; last joint oblong fusiform in shape,
and carrying on the tip 2 slender sete of unequal length. oe pair of
34 G. O. SARS. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
legs smaller than in female, with the inner expansion of proximal joint
much shorter and provided with only 3 spiniform sete.
Length of adult female 1.08 mm.
Remarks. — The above-described form is unquestionably iden-
tical with the species recorded by Prof. Litusepore under the above
name from Siberia. It is about the same size as the type species,
C. staphylinus (Jurine), which it also resembles in the general form of
the body, though at once distinguished from it by the very different shape
of the caudal rami and by the perfectly smooth anal opercle. Like all
true Canthocampti, it is a genuine fresh-water form.
Occurrence. — Some specimens of this form occurred in a
sample taken on June 26, 1899, from some fresh-water pools (the exact
locality not indicated).
Distribution. — Northern part of Siberia, at Sopotschaja Korga
near the mouth of the Jenisei, and on the peninsula Jalmal (LitiseBore).
117. Ametira longipes, Borck.
Found rather abundantly in 6 different bottles.
118. Ameira tau (GIESBRECHT).
Some few specimen of this small species occurred together with the
preceding form in one of the bottles.
119. Parameira elongata, G. O. Sars, n. sp.
(PI. X).
Specific Characters. — Female. Body very slender and
elongated, sub-cylindric in form, with the anterior division scarcely
broader than the posterior. Cephalic segment about the length of the
3 succeeding segments combined; rostral projection almost obsolete.
Urosome fully as long as the anterior division, and having the segments
apparently perfectly smooth; last segment larger than the preceding one,
and deeply incised behind. Caudal rami rather far apart and somewhat
produced, being almost twice as long as they are broad; middle apical
setee rather slender and elongated. Anterior antenne of moderate length
and densely clothed with slender sete, 8-articulate, terminal part exceed-
ing half the length of the proximal one, and having the penultimate
joint imperfectly divided in the middle. Posterior antenne and oral
parts exhibiting the structure characteristic of the genus. 1st pair of
legs with the rami very unequal, the outer one extending to about the
1898—1902. No. 18.] CRUSTACEA. 35
end of the 1st joint of the inner, its last joint somewhat longer and
narrower than the other 2, and armed with 3 spines and 2 geniculate
sete; inner ramus rather slender, with each of the joints carrying inside,
near the end, a slender curved seta, 1st joint considerably longer than
the other 2 combined, last joint armed at the tip with a slender claw
and a curved seta. Natatory legs rather fully developed and resembling
in structure those in the other species of the genus. Last pair of legs
with the distal joint very narrow, sub-linear in form and finely ciliated
on both edges, marginal sete 5 in number and all issuing from the
outermost part of the joint, one of them very thin, hair-like, innermost
one the longest; inner expansion of proximal joint broadly triangular
in form and scarcely extending to the middle of the distal joint, mar-
ginal sete 5 in number, 2 of them attached to the inner edge.
Length of adult female 1.05 mm.
Remarks. — According to the structure of the posterior antenne,
the oral parts, and the anterior pairs of legs, this form should evidently be
referred to the genus Parameira, as defined by the present author in
his account of the Norwegian Harpacticoida. It differs conspicuously
from the other known species of this genus, however, in the very
slender form of the body, the greater length of the inner ramus of the
ist pair of legs, and finally in the shape of the last pair of legs, which
more resembles that in the~ genus Ameiropsis, G.O.Sars. Also in
size this form considerably exceeds any known species of the present
genus.
Occurrence. — Two female specimens of this form were found
in a bottle of specimens taken on July 7, 1900, off Sjépélse Ness from a
depth of 15—25 fathoms.
120. Mesochra pygmea, Borck.
This dwarf form occurred occasionally in 2 of the bottles exa-
mined.
Fam. Laophontide.
121. Laophonte depressa, Scott.
Some few specimens of this species, exactly agreeing with the form
described by the present author from the Norwegian coast, were found
in 2 of the bottles. Dr. Tx. Scorr records this species also from Franz
Josef Land.
36 G. 0. SARS. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
122. Laophonte applanata, G. O. Sars, n. sp.
(Pl. XI).
Specific Characters, — Female. Body very broad and flat-
tened, with all the segments, except the last, lamellarly expanded late-
rally. Cephalic segment large and broad, exhibiting on each side, at ©
about the middle, a distincl notch, edge of the segment finely ciliated;
rostral projection horizontally produced, and of a rather peculiar appea-
rance, being spatulate in form and terminating in 2 broadly rounded
lobes densely clothed with fine hairs. Epimeral parts of the 3 suc-
ceeding segments rounded off and fringed with a dense row of spinules.
Last pedigerous segment somewhat less broad than the 3 preceding
segments. Urosome much shorter than the anterior division, lateral
expansions of the anterior segments linguiform and slightly recurved,
being, like those of the anterior division, densely fringed with spinules;
last segment sub-quadrangular in shape, with the anal opercle smooth.
Caudal rami somewhat far apart and scarcely twice as long as they are
broad, both edges minutely spinulose, tip transversely truncated, with
the inner medial seta rather slender and elongated, outer comparatively
short. Anterior antenne of moderate length and composed of 7 articu-
lations, 2nd joint without any projection behind and much shorter than
the 3rd, 4th joint still shorter, terminal part about the length of the 3rd
joint. Posterior antenne rather strongly built, with the spines of the
distal joint very coarse, claw-like, outer ramus uniarticulate, with 4 rather
thick sete. Oral parts exhibiting the structure characteristic of the
genus. Posterior maxillipeds large and powerful. st pair of legs like-
wise greatly developed, with the inner ramus very strong, biarticulate,
last joint tipped with a powerful claw; outer ramus, as usual, very
narrow, triarticulate, and extending somewhat beyond the middle of the
proximal joint of the inner. Natatory legs with the rami ‘slender and
built upon the type characteristic of the genus. Last pair of legs resem-
bling in structure those in L. depressa, the distal joint being conside-
rably produced, and tapering to a conical point carrying a very slender
hair-like bristle, marginal sete 5 in number, one of them issuing
from the inner edge near the tip; inner expansion ‘of proximal joint
very small and narrow, with only 3 sete. Ovisac of moderate size,
rounded oval in form.
Male, as usual, smaller than female, and having the anterior an-
tenn strongly hinged, sub-cheliform. Inner ramus of 3rd pair of legs
transformed in the usual manner, being distinctly triarticulate, with the
1898—1902. No. 18] CRUSTACEA. 37
middle joint produced at the end to a slender sigmoid spine. Last pair
of legs with the distal joint oblong quadrangular in form, and provided
with 5 spiniform sete, 3 of them issuing from the end; inner expansion
of proximal joint still smaller than in female, and tipped with 2
slender sete.
Length of adult female 0.80 mm.
Remarks. — The present form is easily distinguishable from any
of the other known species of this genus by its broad and flattened
body and the peculiar form of the rostral projection. In its structural
details, however, it exhibits a close relationship to L. depressa Scott.
Occurrence. — Some specimens of this form were found in 4 of
the bottles examined.
128. Laophonte horrida, Norman.
This characteristic form occurred occasionally in 5 of the bottles.
124. Laophonte macera, G. O. Sars.
Found in no less than 9 of the bottles.
125. Laophonte perplexa, Scott. :
Some few specimens of this form occurred in one of the bottles
containing specimens taken on July 30, 1900.
126. Laophonte hyperborea, G. O. Sars, n. sp.
(PI. XID).
Specific Characters. — Female. Body rather slender and
tapering gradually behind, with the segments sharply marked off from
each other and somewhat raised dorsally. Integuments coarse and
exhibiting a pitted sculpture. Cephalic segment large and tumid, seen
dorsally almost quadrangular in form; rostral projection broadly trian-
gular, with the tip minutely bilobular. Epimeral parts of the 3 suc-
ceeding segments not expanded laterally. Last pedigerous segment
slightly produced on each side. Urosome about the length of the an-
terior division, and having the lateral parts of the anterior segments
slightly produced at the hind corners. Last segment fully as long as
the preceding one, but rather narrower, anal opercle smooth. Caudal
rami considerably produced, exceeding in length the anal segment, and
tapering gradually distally, tip narrowly truncated, with the inner medial
seta about as long as the urosome. Anterior antenne comparatively
38 G. 0. SARS. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
short, 7-articulate, 2nd joint the largest and without any projection
behind; terminal part about the length of the 2 preceding joints com-
bined. Posterior antenne and oral parts of the usual structure. 1st
pair of legs less robust than in LZ. applanata, outer ramus very small,
not even attaining half the length of the proximal joint of the inner,
and composed of only 2 joints, the distal one much the longer; inner
ramus rather slender, with the apical claw long and only slightly curved.
Natatory legs of a structure similar to that in L. perplewa Scorr. Last
pair of legs likewise rather similar, though differing somewhat in the
shape of the distal joint, which is not, as in the latter species, trun-
cated at the end, but is obliquely produced.
Male with the anterior antenne very strongly hinged, the last joint
of the proximal part being almost globularly dilated. 2nd pair of legs
scarcely larger than in female, but with one of the sete of the inner
ramus, as in ZL. brevirostris Ciaus, peculiarly transformed. Inner
ramus of 3rd pair of legs transformed in quite a normal manner, being
d-articulate, with the middle joint produced outside to a comparatively
short spiniform projection, outer ramus, on the other hand, scarcely
different from that in female. 4th pair of legs with the outer ramus
somewhat stronger than in female, and having all the spines of the
outer edge coarsely denticulate. Last pair of legs very small, with the
inner expansion of proximal joint quite obsolete.
Length of adult female 0.95 mm.
Remarks. — This form is closely allied to L. perplexa, Scort,
but is of considerably larger size, and moreover differs conspicuously
in the more produced caudal rami, the comparatively shorter anterior
antenna, and the shape of the distal joint of the last pair of legs.
Finally, the male exhibits in its sexual characters several well-marked
differences, as pointed out in the above diagnosis.
Occurrence. — Several specimens of this form occurred in 2 of
the bottles examined.
Fam. Cletodids.
127. Cletodes similis, Scorv.
A solitary female specimen of this form was found in a bottle
containing specimens taken on July 12, 1900, in the bay at Land’s End.
Fam. Tachidiidz.
128. Danielssenia typica, Borcx.
This form occurred occasionally in 3 of the bottles examined.
1898— 1902. No. 18.] CRUSTACEA. 39
Suborder Cyclopoida.
Gnathostoma.
Fam. Oithonide.
129. Oithona similis, Cuavs.
From plankton taken on June 29, 1898, in lat. 57° 31’ N., long. 1° 29’ E.
Fam. Cyclopide.
130. Cyclops agilis, Kocu.
Rather abundant in a sample taken on Aug. 22, 1898, from a fresh-
water pond (the exact locality not indicated).
131. EZuryte longicauda, Purr.
Found in 4 of the bottles examined.
132. Cyclopina gracilis, Cuaus.
A solitary female specimen of this form occurred in a bottle of
specimens taken on July 5, 1901, in the Sound at Hell Gate. -
133. Cyclopina littoralis, Brapy.
2 females of this form were found in a bottle containing specimens
taken on July 12, 1900, in the bay at Land’s End.
Siphonostoma.
Fam. Asterocheride.
134. Dermatomyzon nigripes (BRaDy).
Found occasionally in 3 of the bottles examined.
Fam. Artotrogide.
135. Bradypontius magniceps (Bravy).
An adult female and 2 immature specimens of this form occurred
in a bottle of specimens taken on Sept. 19, 1900, outside Forvisnings
Valley, from a depth of 9—920 fathoms.
40 G. O. SARS. [SEC. ARC. EXP. FRAM
Suborder Caligoida.
Fam. Caligidz.
136. Lepeophtheirus sp.
Three specimens of a Caligoid in the metanauplius stage, appa-
rently belonging to a species of the above genus, were found in a
bottle of specimens taken on July 12, 1900, in the bay at Land’s End.
Order Ostracoda.
Suborder Myodocopa.
Fam. Cypridinide.
137. Philomedes brenda (BatrD).
Female specimens of this form occurred not unfrequently in 3 of
the bottles examined.
Suborder Cladocopa.
Fam. Polycopide.
138. Polycope orbicularis, G. O. Sars.
A solitary specimen of this peculiar form was found in a bottle
of specimens taken on July 12, 1900, in the bay at Land’s End.
Suborder Podocopa.
Fam. Cytheride.
139. Cythereis concinna, Brapy.
Found not unfrequently in 4 of the bottles examined.
140. Cythereis emarginata, G. O. Sars.
Together with the preceding species, but less frequent.
141. Cythereis angulata, G. O. Sars.
Only 2 specimens found.
1898-1902. No. 18.] CRUSTACEA. AL
142. Cytherura atra, G. O. Sars.
A male specimen, apparently of this species, occurred in a bottle
of specimens taken on July 18, 1901, at the mouth of Gaase Fjord
from a depth of about 60 m.
143. Xestoleberis depressa, G. O. Sars.
Found not unfrequently in 3 of the bottles examined.
144. Sclerochilus contortus (Norman).
Several specimens of this form were found in 4 different bottles.
145. Cytheropteron subcircinatum, G. O. Sars.
Only 2 specimens found.
146. Paradoxostoma variabile (Baird).
Rather abundant in some of the bottles.
147. Paradoxostoma obliqvum, G. O. Sars.
Two specimens of this distinct species, which, in the shape of the
shell, somewhat resembles a barnacle-larva in the pupa stage, were
found in a bottle of specimens taken on July 13, 1900, in the bay at
Land’s End.
Order Cirripedia.
Suborder Thoracica.
Fam. Balanide.
148. Balanus balanoides, Lin.
On small stones on the beach, from 2 different places.
149. Balanus porcatus, Costa.
Large clusters of this characteristic form were taken up in the
dredge from moderate depths in many different places.
150. Verruca Strémi (MULL.).
On old shells taken on July 26, 1900, off the western shore, at the
mouth of the Stordal.
42 G. O. SARS. [SEC. ARC, EXP. FRAM
Subclass
Pycnogonidea.
Fam. Pallenids.
151. Pseudopallene circularis (Goopsir),
A single specimen of this form was taken on July 12, 1900, in the
bay at Land’s End.
Fam. Nymphonide.
152. Nymphon grossipes, Kroyer.
Two adult and a young specimen of this form were taken on Aug.
16, 1901, from about 7 fathoms.
153. Chetonymphon hirtipes (BEtt).
Two specimens of this common arctic form are in the collection,
the one from Gaase Fjord, the other from Ren Bay, Ellesmere Land.
Fam. Aurycydide.
154. Hurycyde hispida (Kroyer).
One specimen taken on Aug. 7, 1900, at Ostkap.
1898— 1902, No. 18.| CRUSTACEA. 43
Explanation of the Plates.
PLL
Stephos arcticus, G. O. Sars.
Fig. 1. Adult female, dorsal view, magnified 80 diameters.
» 2 A male specimen, viewed from left side; same amplification.
» 38 Posterior antenna.
» 4& Masticatory part of mandible.
» 9 Mandibular palp.
» 6. Anterior maxilliped.
» 7. Posterior maxilliped.
» 8. Leg of 1st pair.
» 9 Leg of Qnd pair.
» 10. Leg of 8rd pair.
» 11. Leg of last pair in female.
» 12. Last pair of legs in male, viewed from the posterior face.
» 13. Terminal joint of left leg of same, more highly magnified and
viewed from the outer side.
Pi. I,
Zaus Aurelii, Porre.
1. Adult ovigerous female, dorsal view, magnified 104 diameters.
2. Rostral plate, with right anterior antenna.
3. Posterior maxilliped.
» 4 Leg of ist pair.
5. Leg of 3rd pair.
6. Leg of last pair.
Psamathe Arthuri (Poppe).
Fig. 7. Adult female, dorsal view, magnified 68 diameters.
» 8. Anterior antenna.
» 9 Mandible with palp.
» 10. Leg of ist pair.
» 11. Leg of last pair. .
44
G. O. SARS. [SEC. ARC, EXP. FRAM
12.
CHONAPKNEwwr
_
2 DSS Or me Se bo
Pl. I.
Idyea inflata, G. O. Sars.
Adult ovigerous female, dorsal view, magnified 104 diameters.
Anterior antenna.
Posterior antenna.
Mandible with palp.
Maxilla.
Anterior maxilliped.
Posterior maxilliped.
Leg of 1st pair.
Leg of 2nd pair.
Leg of 4th pair.
Leg of last pair.
Left caudal ramus with adjoining part of urosome, exhibiting
the peculiar structure of the caudal sete.
Anterior antenna of male.
Leg of last pair in same.
Genital lobe of same.
PL. IV.
Phyllothalestris frigida (Scott).
Adult female, dorsal view, magnified 86 diameters.
Same viewed from left side.
Anterior antenna.
Posterior antenna.
Posterior maxilliped.
Leg of 1st pair in male.
Inner ramus of 2nd pair of legs in same.
Leg of last pair in female.
Same leg in male.
Pl. V.
Dactylopusia glacialis, G. O. Sars.
Adult female. dorsal view, magnified 104 diameters.
Rostral projection.
Anterior antenna.
Posterior antenna.
Mandible with palp.
Maxilla.
Anterior maxilliped.
Posterior maxilliped.
Leg of 1st pair.
Leg of last pair.
Left caudal ramus.
Leg of 2nd pair in male.
Leg of last pair in male.
1898—1902. No. 18.]
CRUSTACEA. 45
Fig. 1.
got Bi
ys
yn 4
yO
» 6
ane
a 8
a: De
» 10.
eo I,
Fig. 1.
» 2
» 3.
” 4.
” 5.
” 6.
” 7.
5 8:
» 9
» 10.
ye Thi
, 12.
Fig. 1.
» 2
» 3.
» 4
Fig. 5.
” 6.
ds
9 8:
si. 9
» 10.
Fig. 11.
a AD
» 13.
a 14
15.
Pl. VI.
Idomene coronata (Scott).
Adult ovigerous female, dorsal view. magnified 104 diameters.
Rostral plate with left anterior antenna.
Posterior antenna.
Mandible with palp.
Maxilla.
Anterior maxilliped.
Posterior maxilliped.
Leg of ist pair.
Leg of 2nd pair.
Leg of 4th pair.
Leg of last pair.
Pl. VII.
Amphiascus latifolius, G. O. Sars.
Adult ovigerous female, dorsal view, magnified 124 diameters.
Rostrum with left anterior antenna.
Posterior antenna.
Mandible with palp.
Maxilla.
Anterior maxilliped.
Posterior maxilliped.
Leg of ist pair.
Leg of 3rd pair.
Leg of last pair.
Left caudal ramus, with adjoining part of urosome.
Inner ramus of 2nd pair of legs in male.
Pl. VI.
Amphiascus congener, G. O. Sars.
Adult female, dorsal view, magnified 124 diameters.
Rostrum with right anterior antenna.
Leg of 1st pair.
Leg of last pair.
Amphiascus polaris, G. O. Sars.
Adult ovigerous female, dorsal view, magnified 124 diameters.
Rostrum with left anterior antenna.
Leg of 1st pair.
Leg of last pair.
Inner ramus of 2nd pair of legs in male.
Leg of last pair of same.
Amphiascus brevis, G. 0. Sars.
Adult ovigerous female, dorsal view, magnified 124 diameters.
Rostrum.
Anterior antenna.
Leg of 1st pair.
Leg of last pair.
46
G. 0. SARS. [SEC. ARC. EXP, FRAM
Fig.
Pl. IX.
Canthocamptus Nordenskjéldi, Li.ses.
PHONON wP re
CONT wrNp
Adult female, dorsal view, magnified 104 diameters.
Anterior antenna.
Posterior antenna.
Mandible with palp.
Maxilla.
Anterior maxilliped.
Posterior maxilliped.
Leg of 1st pair.
Leg of 2nd pair.
Leg of 3rd pair.
Leg of 4th pair.
Leg of last pair.
Left caudal ramus.
Inner ramus of 3rd pair of legs in mule.
Leg of last pair of same.
Pl. X.
Parameira elongata, G. O. Sars.
Adult female, dorsal view, magnified 104 diameters.
Anterior antenna.
Posterior antenna.
Mandible with palp.
Maxilla.
Anterior maxilliped.
Posterior maxilliped.
Leg of 1st pair.
Leg of 2nd pair.
Leg of 8rd pair.
Leg of 4th pair.
Leg of last pair.
Left caudal ramus with adjoining part of the anal segment.
Pl. XI.
Laophonte applanata, G. O. Sars.
Adult ovigerous female, dorsal view, magnified 124 diameters.
Rostral projection with right anterior antenna.
Posterior antenna.
Posterior maxilliped.
Leg of 1st pair.
Leg of 2nd pair.
Inner ramus of a leg of 8rd pair.
Inner ramus of a leg of 4th pair.
Leg of last pair.
Left caudal ramus.
Inner ramus of a leg of 3rd pair in male.
Leg of last pair in same.
1898—1902. No. 18.] CRUSTACEA. 47
Pl. XII.
Laophonte hyperborea, G. O. Sars.
Adult female, dorsal view, magnified 124 diameters.
Same viewed from left side.
Rostral projection with left anterior antenna.
Posterior antenna.
Posterior maxilliped.
Leg of 1st pair.
Leg of 2nd pair.
Leg of last pair.
8 Inner ramus of a leg of 2nd pair in male.
» 10. Male, inner ramus of a leg of 3rd pair.
» 11. Same, leg of 4th pair.
» 12. Same, leg of last pair.
3
WOMAN WLS >
Printed 1st June, 1909.
ellie
Rep. of the2°° Norweg.Arct.Exped.in the Fram 1898-1902 N°18.
brad
4! eee Ve
: : AiG
Stephos arcticus, G.0.Sars. Norsk Lithgr0 ficin
G.0.Sars,autogr
PLIL.
Rep.of the2°2 Norweg.Arct.Exped.in the Fram 1898-1902 N216.
| a ued — =
a
G.0.Sars,autogr: 1-6 Zaus Aurelit, Poppe Norsk Lithgr: Officin
7-11 Psamathe Arthuri, (Poppe)
cao
PLE
Se Sr ee
—— SS
: Yk 2
, : AWY:
Z
a ONY \\ Be
\ toi
. Co Be NX Sok
LL
MO? —J \
es OE
2 Sa Ze ee
“7 i Le o ss
Sr” GPE
Rep.of the2 °° Norweg.Arct. Exped.in the Fram 1898-1902 N
i ee
Z
SL fib fe
PKA Ae
Ye 3s
A\\ \
: Ws
ge iJ
Idyeea inflata, G.0.Sars.
\
Norsk Lithgr Officin
G.0.Sars,autogr
PLIV.
Rep.of the2 2% Norweg.Arct.Exped.in the Fram 1898-1902 N°18.
a A a in
ba ‘< 7 : | \/ ay x }
i AT? AS ‘ f as \y tg 7,
Norsk Lithgr Officin
: 8.0Sars.aulogr Phyllothalestris frigida(Scott)
PLY.
xped.in the Fram 1898-1902 N°18.
A a
RS
S 3 ‘i ae
: SOX, Ss MANO Y a ee
Sey TS = tT * ge
‘ote aCe een < = A ‘
—= = K a a ‘
Ba = oh Nee ;
= = : S = x 4
#. a c Sif)
= SS —S L
> =— ee 4
T vA é es . i . ffi f
80Sars.autogr — Dactylopusia glacialis,6.0.Sars. Hones ENE
PLYE
Norweg.Arct.Exped.in the Fram 1898-1902 N?18.
nd
Norsk Lithgr: Officin
Idomene coronata (Scott)
Rep.of the 2
6.0.Sars,autogr
of the2% i
Repo e2 Norweg.Arct.Exped.in the Fram 1898-1902 or
—
Norsk Lithgr Officin
T
6.0.Sars,autogr : : :
Amphiascus latifelius, G.O.Sars.
PLVI
ibs Norweg. Aret.Exped.in the Fram 1898-1902 N°18.
[aN
®
= - See We “yobs 2 255
: ia aes es me ee
uu Se — Z —— ===t she
be: x a — — AQ GA REN fe4, ;
a =a RA SSSER
o ve ; is -_
congener, G.0.Sars .Norsk Tithge Officin
-4, Amphiascus
5-10
: 6.0.Sars,autogr: |
G.OSars.
_6.05ars
polaris ,
brevis
PL.IX.
~1902 N
18;
uu
om
Norweg.Arct. Exped.in the Fram 1898
Rep.ot thez “
6.0. ‘ : eeepoie yp BaAae Norsk Lithan Officin
OSars,autogr Canthocamptus Nordenskjdldi Lilljeb. ee |
PX.
Norsk Lithgr Officin
I
Rep.of the2 °? Norweg.Arct.Exped.in the Fram 1898-1902 N°18.
ye
~ G0. j
Sars,autogr Parameira. elongata, G.0.Sars.
Pix
G.0.Sars,autogr ei a
utogr Laophonte applanata,G.0.Sars. Norsk Lithgr Officin
PLT
Laophonte hyperborea COSars. 9 thr Officin’
G.0.Sars,autogr
Rep.of the2 “* Norweg.Arct.Exped.in the Fram 1898-1902 N218.
REPORT OF THE SECOND NORWEGIAN ARCTIC EXPEDITION
IN THE “FRAM” 1898—1902. No. 19.
H. G. SIMMONS:
STRAY CONTRIBUTIONS
TO THE
BOTANY OF NORTH DEVON
AND SOME OTHER ISLANDS, VISITED IN 1900—1902
WITH ONE MAP IN THE TEXT
AND AN
ALPHABETICAL INDEX
TO No.2, FLORA OF ELLESMERELAND, No. 16, PLANTS OF N. W. GREENLAND,
AND THIS PAPER
AT THE EXPENSE OF THE FRIDTJOF NANSEN FUND
FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE
PUBLISHED BY
VIDENSKABS-SELSKABETIKRISTIANIA
(THE SOCIETY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES OF KRISTIANIA)
KRISTIANIA
PRINTED BY A. W.BROGGER
1909
As the Expedition’s principal field of work lay in Ellesmereland,
and as only in a few instances had I any opportunity of visiting other
parts of the Arctic American Archipelago, the contributions to the botani-
cal exploration of that region which I have been able to make have, for
the most part, reference to the Ellesmereland flora and vegetation. The
former is treated in my FI. Ellesm., about the latter I hope soon to get
an opportunity of publishing a paper. From our three quarters, in the
south coast, however, some expeditions were made which brought home
some small materials of plants and observations from the south-west and
west also. For my own part, I visited in 1900 and 1902 a few points on
the coast of N. Devon; in 1901 and 1902 different points in the island
of N. Kent; and in 1902 the two small islets Castle Island and Devils
Isle off the coast of N. Devon. As these short visits were made in the
favorable season, I think I can give a tolerably adequate idea of the
botanical features of these places. Still worse is the case with the con-
tributions to the botany of some other places where I have not myself
been and which were only visited in the spring sledging expeditions by
other members of the expedition. Mr. Scuer especially has thus contri-
buted to the botanical exploration; his collections and notes were made
on Graham Island, in Heiberg Land, and in N. Devon.
The places where collections are made are shown in the sketch-map
on the next page where they are marked by their names or by numbers
corresponding with those in the text.
2 H. G. SIMMONS. (SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
110° 105° (00 95 30°
Hl
; a8
80)
‘ 4,
ES
a
= Bl
Qa u
79 = Ces Islan
z 2
o
z ag
: 780)
if rT)
w
oe Ce eo 3 Q
eos Lowy 2
B i Ca
78 g ae q
za ly 4
ae 2 ¢B
fue = i) ¢ = ia 'G/ oP 79
= ~;
ie 7
oO
7
77] Wig Ww
78
>g
uu
|
\ a
76) WW
77]
; a B78, Wess Bond ® Vera UY
v ) oat Can
5 CORNWALLIS E
LAND
I. NORTH DEVON
95
90 a5
1898-1902. No. 19.] STRAY CONTRIBUT. TO THE BOTANY OF N.DEVON. 5
I. North Devon.
Certain parts of the large island of North Devon were visited during
the Franxuin Search expeditions and some plants brought home by
members of them. These collections, however, are made quite casually
by officers not specially entrusted with botanical work, and in most cases
only a few specimens have been brought home from each place. The
only station for which perhaps a somewhat more comprehensive list
might be compiled from the specimens in the London collections, is
Beechey Island—the first winter-quarter of the ill-fated Frankuin Expe-
dition and afterwards the rendez-vous for the different parties engaged
in the search for the missing expedition. Further, some collections were
made at other points of the same neighbourhood, and along the shore
of the Wellington Channel Dr. M’Cormick and others observed or col-
lected a few plants. The north coast, however, was in great part not
even mapped out in 1900, and, when we first visited it, not a single note
about its flora existed.
The contributions to the botany of N. Devon were brought home
from the following points: —
1. Boat Cape lat. 75° 58’ long. 90° 25°
2. Point in Viks Fjord 75° 52° 90° 45/
3. Bottom of Viks Fjord 75° 57 91° 40°
4, Lownessin WestFjord 76° 8° 90° 10’
5. Cape Vera 76° 13° 89° 25‘
6. Near large glacier 76° 17’ 89° 40°
7. Mount Belcher 76° 29° 90° 54‘
1. Boat Cape.
This locality was visited by a party on July 26, 1901, and Mr. ScHEI
noted here Dryas integrifolia in flower and plenty of Salix arctica.
He also brought home a little collection which contained: Papaver
6 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
radicatum (3841), Alsine verna (3837), Festuca ovina (3839), Poa ab-
breviata (3840), Catabrosa algida (3838), and two mosses (3842): Camp-
tothecitum nitens and Brachythecium salebrosum (cf. Bryan!, Bryo-
phyta, p. 245).
2. Point in Viks Fjord.
The place was visited by the same party on July 27, 1901, and
Mr. Scuei here noted Saxifraga nivalis, S. Hirculus, Polygonum vivi-
parum, Dryas integrifolia, Cassiope tetragona, and some grasses.
Vegetation scarce.
3. Bottom of Viks Fjord.
Visited by the same party, July 29, 1901. Mr. Scuer noted about
the vegetation here that it was very scanty. Around some lakelets in
the low land there was a vegetation of grasses (Carices or Eriophora ?)
and on the dry ledges a few flowering dicotyledoneous plants, the species
of which were, however, not noted. Mr. Scuer found the cause of this
poverty in the geological nature of the soil which is formed only of the
débris of the same heavy, brownish limestone which in Ellesmereland
also formed the poorest of all soils. At the last mentioned locality this
limestone was interlaid with argillaceous slate and marlslate and there-
fore had made possible the development of a somewhat richer vegetation.
4. Low ness in the outer part of West Fjord.
After leaving our winter-quarters in Harbour Fjord we anchored at
this place, August 11, 1900. Our stay was, however, too short to allow
me time for more than a very brief trip over the nearest part of the
low ness, which was formed solely of limestone of the same poor quality
as that which generally builds up both those parts of N. Devon and the
outher parts of the Ellesmereland coast opposite. As usual, this soil of
the limestone ledges and débris of the same material proved utterly. poor,
and I could not manage to visit the cliffs at the point where the rooke-
ries of gulls and guillemots doubtless formed a somewhat richer field.
The area I traversed certainly, even had there been better time for
its inspection, would have yielded little more than is shown by the
1 N. Bryan, Bryophyta in itinere polari norvagorum secundo collecta. Rep. sec.
norw. arct. exp., I, No. 11, Kristiania 1906, (quoted: “Bryxn, Bryophyta”).
1898—1902. No. 19.] STRAY CONTRIBUT. TO THE BOTANY OF N. DEVON, 7
scanty list which follows below. The densest vegetation was found along
some small brooks and around some shallow ponds near the shore where,
however, mosses decidedly formed the most prominent constituent of the
verdure. The flowering plants obtained were:— Sawifraga cernua (2629),
S. groenlandica (2632), S. nivalis, S. oppositifolia, Potentilla pulchella,
Dryas integrifolia, Draba alpina (2630), D. subcapitata (2627), Coch-
learia officinalis var. groenlandica (2628), Papaver radicatum (2626),
Cerastium alpinum, Stellaria longipes, Alsine verna (2623), A. Rossii
(2631), Salix arctica, Glyceria Vahliana (2657), G. distans var. vagi-
nata (2625), Catabrosa algida (2624), Juncus biglumis. Mr. Scuer
found besides Saaxifraga stellaris var. comosa and S. rivularis. No
Carices or Eriophora wore found in the ponds.
The list of mosses (BryHN, Bryophyta, p. 204—205) contains 33 spe-
cies. The most prominent among them were Tortula ruralis and the large
Hypna, such as H. uncinatum, H. turgescens, H. Bambergeri. The
lichens and algae are not yet determined, but I may mention that blue-
green algae were found in great masses in the ponds and also form-
ing layers on moist stones and clay. Along the margin of one of the
ponds lay, on a long stretch, a layer of organic remains, principally
blue-green algae and diatoms, in a halfdried condition and from 10 to
15 cm. thick. In one of the rivulets I also found, growing on stones
and lying loose, an Enteromorpha which I have previously found in
several places in Ellesmereland. It belongs, as far as I have as yet
had any opportunity of ascertaining, to an undescribed species.
5. Cape Vera.
This place was first visited by Mr. Scuet, July 22, 1901 and after-
wards by myself, July 14—15, 1902. Cape Vera forms the end of a
long, pointed naze between the West Fjord and the narrow western part
of Jones Sound. Even as we steamed past it in August, 1900, I had
observed a rather dense verdure in some parts of the low foreland in
front of the high wall of limestone cliffs which forms the interior of the
ness. This mountain, the Fulmar Petrel Cliff, reaches a height of per-
haps 1500 feet and descends in a rather abrupt wall towards the
low land, intersected by numerous narrow ravines and flanked by high
pyramids and obelisks of limestone. On the top of the cliffs there is a
fairly wide névé, feeding a good-sized glacier which flows down some-
what further west on the north side. The cliffs are built up of the
same hard limestone as those to the east, and would consequently be
8 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP, FRAM
rather poor in plant life were it not that their ledges are apt to be used
as a rookery where millions of fulmar petrels breed. Thus the slopes
below become abundantly manured, and both the slopes of limestone
débris and the inner parts of the foreland are covered with a dense ver-
dure formed, for the greater parl, of mosses but also of flowering plants.
On the southern side the foreland consists mostly of limestone débris,
on the northern, to a considerable extent of clay also. Here the vege-
tation is, as usually in the clay-plains, rather open, and consists chiefly
of flowering plants. In the foreland there are also some shallow ponds,
encircled by the usual rim of mosses with a few higher plants strewn in.
On the surface of the snowdrifts lying in the ravines, and in the
upper part of the slopes, “red snow” appeared in greater abundance than
I have seen anywhere else; and in the rivulets, on inundated ground
and in the ponds many algae, especieally blue-green ones, were growing
Dr. Bryun has given an account of the mosses (Bryophyta, pp. 245,
249—9251), and it may therefore be enough to point out that he has found
not less than 50 species in my collection from this locality.
The flowering plants noted or collected at Cape Vera are:— Dryas
integrifolia, Saxifraga oppositifolia (3843), S. flagellaris, S. nivalis
3830), S. cernua, S. groenlandica (3846), Draba alpina (8836, 3841),
D. alpina var. glacialis (3826), D. subcapitata (3829), Cochlearia offi-
cinalis var. groenlandica (3841), Papaver radicatum with f. Hartia-
num (3828), Ranunculus sulphureus, Cerastium alpinum (3824), Stel-
laria longipes (8850), Alsina verna (3837), Oxyria digyna, Salix arc-
tica, Juncus biglumis, Festuca ovina var. supina (3839), Poa abbre-
viata (3840), P. cenisia (and f. prolifera), Glyceria distans (4016).
Catabrosa algida (3838), Alopecurus alpinus (3825). I may, of course,
have overlooked some species or other, but I was especially struck by
the absence of such common plants as f. inst. Pedicularis hirsuta, and
I also sought in vain for Eriophora and Carices.
6. East of the large glacier west of Cape Hawes.
During our stay here, July 17, 1902, I was chiefly occupied in dred-
ging, but I could easily see that this place would not yield in any case
more than a few of the most common species such as Sawifraga op-
positifolia, Papaver radicatum, Draba alpina, Cerastium alpinum,
etc., which were growing in an open clay-field below the cliffs.
1898 -1902. No. 19.] STRAY CONTRIBUT. TO THE BOTANY OF N. DEVON. 9
7. Mount Belcher.
I use this name for the mountain opposite Devil’s Isle, were a cairn
was found with a record from the English Franxiw Search expedition
under BELCHER, as a sign how far east his parties had proceeded. We
visited the place, July 25, 1902, in our boat expedition, and I went over
the low land below the mountain and along a small river some way
inland. It was very poor ground, clay and gravel plains with scanty
vegetation. The following plants were noted:— Dryas integrifolia,
Saxifraga oppositifolia, S. flagellaris, S. cernua, S. groenlandica,
Draba alpina, D. subcapitata, Papaver radicatum, Cerastium alp-
inum, Stellaria longipes, Alsine verna, A. Rossii, Salix arctica,
Juncus biglumis, Glyceria distans, Catabrosa algida, Alopecurus
alpinus.
With this I have to finish my notes about the flora of Nort Devon.
Even were some one or other of the species found in the south-western
parts by the earlier visitors to be added, the whole list would not amount
to more than about 30 plants. This, of course, cannot represent the real
bulk of the flora, but must only be regarded as the result of some short
trips, made chiefly in places which are not apt to give rise to a thriving
vegetation. Further west towards Arthur Fjord there are, as Captain
Baumann told me when returning from a trip in August 1900, wide
stretches of bogs and grass-grown plains; and, in all probability, the east-
ern parts of the island will, some time, turn out to be still richer, as
they are built up of primary rocks, and will doubtless present a greater
likeness to South-Eastern Ellesmereland with its richer flora. It would
be of great interest to get some knowledge of this region, as it forms
the natural way of migration from Baffin’s Land northward over primary
rock uninterrupted by less favorable soil. From this point of view, it is
also very much to be regretted that the leader of the expedition did not
allow any time for an exploration of Coburg Island, which in other re-
spects also would have been of considerable interest. It is to be hoped
that these fairly accessible regions will be examined in a not too distant
future.
10 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
II. Castle Island and Devil’s Isle.
1. Castle Island.
For the little island lying off Cape Vera in about lat. 76°10’ and
long. 89° 20’ I use this name which, after conferring with Captain
Sverprup, I had already used in my Prel. Rep.1 instead of the name
“St. Helena” which we had jestingly given it, without any thought of
retaining it later. The name used above is rather appropriate on account
of the ruin-like forms which the withered limestone cliffs of the islet
have assumed.
The island was first visited by a party in 1901, and Mr. Scuer
made some collections and notes there, July 21. In 1902 I myself had
an opportunity of visiting it; and as we were obliged to stay there from
July 9 to 14, I had leisure for a very thorough examination of its flora.
Castle Island is entirely built up of Silurian limestone of the same
hard, siliciferous kind as that which forms the adjacent part of N. Devon
and also the outer coast of S. W. Ellesmereland. The highest part of
the island rises about 200 feet, sloping to the east, and surrounded by
low cliffs, some of very curious shapes, sbowing that the lower parts of
the island have emerged rather recently from the sea. Terraces of
limestone débris, also formed below the sea-level, surround some parts
of the rocks; in some places there is a talus of débris fallen down from
the highest part; and lastly there are some small patches of clay. Now
this is indeed a very poor soil, and would allow the existence of only
a very few plants had not numerous birds chosen the little islet for
their breeding place. On several of the higher rocks were nests of the
large gulls, Larus glaucus and L. argentatus, the black guillemot nested
everywhere in the cracks of the rocks, there was a colony of terns in
the low gravel plain, and lastly numerous eiderducks bred everywhere
around the base of the cliffs. The reason why so many birds seek
refuge here is, as may easily be discovered, that the strong current of
1 An explanation of the abridged titles is to be found in my Ellesmereland Flora.
1898—1902. No.19.] STRAY CONTRIBUT. TO THE BOTANYOFN.DEVON. 11
western Jones Sound always keeps the ice in motion around the island,
and thus produces open water early in the summer, so as to keep away
the fox from the island during de breeding-season. This bird life has,
of course, considerably enriched the meagre soil of the island; still the
central ridge and its talus are almost void of vegetation, except for some
lichens and small patches of moss, or some scanty tufts of grass, etc.
around the gulls’ nests. The terraces of limestone gravel also are very
poor. Indeed, most of the pebbles are covered with lichens, among
which Xantoria elegans as usual catches the eye; but only at wide
intervals is to be found a little tuft of moss or a small individual of
a flowering plant.
The mosses, which form the most prominent part of the vegetation,
apart from the not yet determined lichens, are mostly found near the
base of the cliff where some water trickles down, and in some moist
depressions or patches of clay. The flowering plants, which are very
few both in number of species and of individuals, grow mostly among
moss. The following flowering plants were found: — Sawifraga cernua
(the most common species), S. oppositifolia (surprisingly scarce),
S. groenlandica, Draba hirta (4017), D. subcapitata (4017), Cochlearia
officinalis var. groenlandica, Papaver radicatum, Cerastium alpinum,
Glyceria distans var. vaginata (4017), Catabrosa algida (4017, chiefly
around the gulls’ nests), Alopecurus alpinus.
The moss collection I brought home contained 31 species (BrYHN,
Bryophyta, p. 254—255) of which 9 are not present in the collection
from Cape Vera, but of these, two were found again on Devil’s Isle.
9. Devil’s Isle.
This little rock, lying off the coast of North Devon north of the
entrance to Norfolk Inlet in lat. 76° 29’, long. 90° 40’, was only visited
during our last boat journey; but as we lay ice-bound there from July
19 to 30, 1902, with the exception of two days, when we were able
to take a trip over to the vicinity of Mount Belcher (see above, p. 9),
I had more than sufficient time for a very accurate examination of its
vegetation. The whole island is small enough to be walked round in
half an hour. It has the shape of an obliquely cut cone, about 200 feet
high. The highest point lies at the eastern end and is accessible only
from the west where there is a gentle slope; all the other sides are
almost vertical, but there is a narrow strip of ground running round
helow the steep wall. The material of the rock here also is limestone,
12 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
but of a somewhat less hard kind than in Castle Island, with less sili-
cate and more clay.
However it would form still a very poor soil were it not inhabited
by rather many birds. There are more gulls than in Castle Island,
quite a colony of terns and also some eider-ducks. Some of the gulls’
nests are very old, forming small hillocks, built up of a mixture of
pebbles, bones of different animals, feathers, moss, dung of the birds ete.
Some of them are clothed with a dense vegetation of Cochlearia,
Catabrosa, Glyceria distans, and somewhere also Sawxifraga groen-
landica. In the lower parts of the island the rock is covered with a
layer of pebbles, or here and there with clay. The débris, and partly
also the rocks, are more or less covered with lichens in places where
water trickles down from some small snowdrifts with green and blue-
green algae also, as for instance Phormidium sp. At the western end
there was a large snowdrift stretching inland from the ice foot, and as
a little rivulet that carried organic material from the breeding-places
flowed over it, there was developed a vegetation of different algae on
the snow, which appeared partly red, partly green. I have not yet had
time to examine the algae collected here.
The number of species contained in the collection of mosses which
I brought together from the rocks, from among the pebbles, and espe-
cially from the moist depressions and irrigated places as well as from
the gulls’ rookery, reaches 35 (Bryan, Bryophyta, p. 251—253). Of
these, 3 are found neither in Castle Island nor at Cape Vera; 2 in the
former locality but not in the latter. The list of flowering plants
embraces the following species: — Sawxifraga oppositifolia (somewhat
more abundant than in Castle Island), S. cernua, S. groenlandica with
f. flavescens (4010), Draba subcapitata, Cochlearia officinalis var.
groenlandica (the most abundant species), Papaver radicatum (chiefly
near the top), Glyceria distans var. vaginata (4011), G. angustata
(4012), Catabrosa algida (4009), Alopecurus alpinus.
I think that the vegetation of the two small islands, Devil’s Isle
and Castle Island, may prove to be of a certain interest. They show
a great recemblance one to the other, both being built up of the same
material, which also forms the adjacent coast of North Devon, and which
is little fitted for the development of vegetation; both of them, for the
greater part, have risen above the surface of the sea at a rather late
period; both are inhabited by numerous birds, as they are separated
1898-1902. No.19.] STRAY CONTRIBUT. TO THE BOTANY OFN.DEVON. 13
from the mainland by a strait in which the strong current keeps the water
open most of the year, or at least before the beginning of the breeding-
season. The distance from the mainland of North Devon to Castle
Island is somewhat less than two miles, to Devil’s Island less than one
mile. Such short distances can, of course, be easily surmounted by
plant-migration, if, for the transporting of plant species, we should
attribute any greater importance to those means of conveyance which
are generally reckoned with for the stocking of islands, viz., wind, birds
and currents (including floating ice).
We shall now see what inferences may be drawn from a comparison
of the plant life of these islands with that of some neighbouring points
of the larger islands. Firstly it is to be observed that the number of
flowering plants is nearly the same in both islands, viz., 11 on Castle
Island and 10 on Devil’s Isle. Two are found in the former alone
(Draba hirta, Cerastium alpinum), one in the latter alone (Glyceria
angustata), nine are common. If now the vegetation of the nearest
points in North Devon is drawn into comparison, we will see that all
these species are found there except Glyceria angustata, which may
easily have been overlooked. The flora of Mount Belcher, as far as
known, reckons 17 species, that of Cape Vera 24, and that of the dry
limestone ness to the south-west 21. The nearest points in Ellesmere-
land — Gull Cove and Falcon Cliff — which have the same geological
nature, affording similar conditions of life as being breeding-places for
gulls and other birds, show at least 30 and 40 to 50 species respectively .
The list of higher plants found in North Kent reaches 33.
Thus it appears that the two islands which are isolated by open
water, show a considerably poorer flora than that of the mainland
localities under similar conditions, notwithstanding the short distance
that separates them from the nearest land (the distance over to Gull
Cove also is small enough, about 11 miles). The relation of the flora
of either of these islands to that of Falcon Cliff will be about 1:4 or
5, to that of Gull Cove 1:3, to that of Cape Vera 2:5 or, more
probably, about 1:3, as without doubt several species have been over-
_looked during the short visit to Cape Vera; whereas the flora of the islands
must be looked upon as thoroughly known, at least as far as flowering
plants are concerned. If we take the mosses for comparison we will
get similar figures. Of course it may have happened that I did not get
some species or other in my collections, notwithstanding that I carefully
tried to make my moss collections as complete as possible; but I think
we may look upon the numbers 31 for Castle Island and 385 for Devil’s
14 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
Isle a very nearly representing the true flora. Now we find for Cape
Vera 50 species, which to probably not a few might be added by a
closer survey than that which I could make during my short visit. For
Gull Cove the number is 34 and for Falcon Cliff 62, both perhaps some-
what too small. From North Kent I have brought home 50 species of
mosses.
Now the question is to be approached: how have the plants of the
two small islands reached thither over the open strait? It is especially
to be noted that there are none of them that have fruits or seeds adapted
for spreading by means of wind, if we except the grasses. Even Dryas
integrifolia, which is so commonly distributed along both coasts of
Jones Sound (also at Cape Vera) and which has so well-developed a
flying apparatus, is absent from both islands. This does not speak in
favour of attributing too great influence to the wind in transporting seeds.
The grasses, indeed, especially Alopecurus alpinus, might have come
over by aid of the wind, but they may also have used another mode
of conveyance. Most of the plants have small, light seeds (Sawifraga
oppositifolia and S. groenlandica, Papaver, the Drabae, Cochlearia,
Cerastium) and may, perhaps, be transported by the wind, but for
Saxifraga cernua this mode of conveyance becomes less acceptable,
as generally it does not fruit but is vegetatively propagated. The
bulbillae of this plant cannot be transported through the air. It appears
at the first glance that the flowering plants of the islands are nearly
all such as commonly grow around the gulls’ nests in the rookeries of
the mainland.
The spores of mosses are, of course, easily transported by wind
over even far greater distances than those here in question, and thus
we might easily find an explanation of the migration of those plants to
the islands, if all mosses were commonly found in fruit in the adjacent
lands. But now the case in fact is, that most mosses in arctic lands
are always, or nearly always, found sterile. Bryn, Bryophyta, p. 1,
also mentions that relatively few mosses fruit in Ellesmereland and
elsewhere in our field, the acrocarpic musci foliosi principally; whereas
capsules are found only exceptionally in the pleurocarpic species. Out
of the 45 species found in one or both of the two islands, 23 are such
as are specially mentioned by Brynn as found fruiting in my collec-
tions from Ellesmereland or other adjacent regions, and concerning 4
more, he-gives no special notice as to fruiting or sterile state, but as
they belong to the acrocarpic species, in part to such as are generally
found fruiting, we may perhaps reckon 27. Among those explicitly
1898-1902. No. 19.) STRAY CONTRIBUT. TO THE BOTANY OF N.DEVON. 15
mentioned as sterile in all my collections are 7 acrocarp ones, which
perhaps fruit somewhere in the neighbourhood. At all events, the per-
centage of species that are found fruiting in the collections as a whole,
is unsually large among the mosses from the islands, which decidedly
speaks in favour of the supposition that only spores can be carried so
far by wind, not fragments of moss plants.
There are, however, also 11 species of pleurocarpic mosses found
in the islands, which are entirely sterile throughout my collections and
which are generally found so in the Arctic Regions. If we would find
the means of migration which these have used for reaching the small
islands, I think we must look to the birds. Even if we leave out the
snow-bunting, which probably breeds on Castle Island, and certainly
pays visits to both, as well as the ptarmigans which may casually fly
over the strait, we have the gulls left which fly backwards and forwards
between their rookeries and the mainland, especially to some lakes near
Mount Belcher, the only locality where we found trout. Now I do not
think that the birds often carry seeds or other parts of plants with them
casually, even though it cannot be denied that they might do so, but |
cannot but think, that they have at some time, when the islands were
smaller than they are now and consisted of more isolated, bare rocks,
carried nestbuilding material thither from the mainland. And _ that
material, most probably, consisted of mosses, especially of the larger
kinds, that is to say the pleurocarpic ones, for instance the Hypna.
But among the moss, might easily be carried seeds and fragments of
such plants as are generally found growing among moss, viz. the species
really growing here. Thus I think the islands got their first flora, some
of the mosses and the flowering plants. Afterwards, when these first
immigrants had spreed in the island, the gulls had no further occasion
for procuring the material for their nests (which, moreover, are used
year after year) from afar, and now immigration by means of
the wind only could take place. But the wind carries only very small
bodies such as spores, and therefore the flora, which is still in the act
of receiving new species of fruiting mosses, has become comparatively
richer in such species than in other plants; and the percentage of mosses
in the flora as a whole, is larger here than in that of the adjacent points
in the mainland which in other respects offer the same conditions of life.
Of course the immigration of these plants which have used the wind
as a means of conveyance, fruiting mosses, freshwater algae, and lichens,
also dates from far back, the last-mentioned having probably been the
very first colonists. One mode of conveyance I have entirely left out
16 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
of this discussion, viz., marine currents and floating ice. The cause for
excluding this as a factor in the stocking of the islands here in question,
les partly in the existence of a high ice-foot round most parts of their
shores. Castle Island was entirely encircled by an icefoot which appeared
never to disappear, and, even had some part of the ice-foot along the
shore of Devil’s Isle been washed away at the time of our visit, I
think that no single species has reached thither with the help of the
water. The influence of marine currents in the dispersal of plants has
certainly been often much over-valued, and I can only agree with Ernst!
who writes: ,[t has long been known that only a comparatively small
proportion of plants are capable of extending the area of their distri-
bution by this means. A comparison of island floras has shown that it
is exclusively strand plants. .... which have seeds and fruits posses-
sing the necessary adaptations for this method of dispersal by ocean-
currents, that is which are capable of floating for weeks or months on
sea-water, without losing the power of germination“ (1. ¢., p. 5).
But here we have not a single strand plant, and, as a rule, the
arctic lands are rather poor in halophytic plants which might stand a
journey in salt water, The floating ice, of course, may sometimes carry ~
seeds and fragments of plants — I have occasionally seen blocks of ice
from the tidal crack, laden with masses of vegetable matter — but this
does not prove that plants can in fact immigrate by that means of
conveyance; for a short drift within a fjord or over a strait, it may
perhaps sometimes be of use, if the ice-block takes the shore again
before the plant fragments are blown into the water or wetted through;
but as a transport over wide distances it is certainly not serviceable, as
the vegetable matter will be imbedded in the ice and will be unable to
come farther inland before being immersed in salt water.
It may also be mentioned that both islands were formerly visited
by man. I am not, indeed, inclined to attribute any influence for the
transporting of plants to these visits, but where people have been, one
has always the possibility of human influence to reckon with. The
indication of human visitors to these islands consisted especially in a
sort of shelters, built for the eider-ducks to place their nests in. Now
such shelters are built in countries where the eider-duck is protected
for the collecting of down; but it is not known that the Eskimo have
done any such thing anywhere else, and this region has certainly never
had any other human inhabitants. Perhaps the shelters may be attri-
1) Ernst, A., The New Flora of the Voleanic Island of Krakatau. Cambridge 1908.
1898-1902. No. 19.] STRAY CONTRIBUT. TO THE BOTANY OFN.DEVON, 17
buted to whalers who may have heen here during the time of the whale-
fishery in Baffin Bay. It seems strange, however, that they should
have undertaken any such work.
The book of Ernst, quoted above, contains moreover several other
points of interest in connection with the problem of immigration here
in question. It gives accounts of the three botanical investigations under-
taken in the island of Krakatau after the great catastrophe which annihi-
lated the old vegetation of the island, August 26—27, 1883. The flora
of the island consisted, at the first visit, three years after the eruption,
principally of plants carried by wind: 6 species of blue-green algae,
2 mosses, and 11 ferns‘. Treus found, besides, seedlings of 9 species
of phanerogams and seeds of some more plants on the shore. During
the following years, members of every division of the plant kingdom
have immigrated, and Ernst, |. ¢., p. 38—45, gives a list of 137 species.
Of these, 45 are cryptogamous plants which almost certainly have immi-
erated by aid of the wind. Among the 92 phanerogams, 67 (73 °/o)
are halophytes which Ernst thinks have been carried to the shore by
sea currents; 9 species (10 °/o) he reckons as certainly imported by birds;
15 species (16 °/.) as having been carried by the winds. He also gives
alternately the latter figures as 18 and 28, when more doubtful species
are included.
Now, indeed, it may seem that I have chosen for comparison, a
district of to dissimilar a nature; but I think it may be of some interest
to put together these two instances of plant migration. Krakatau lies
twenty-two miles from the nearest point of the mainland, and twelve
from the nearest island which, however, suffered so greatly from the
catastrophe that, for a long time, it was not able to supply much. Still,
we have here got 137 immigrated species in less than twenty-five years.
But this has taken place in a tropical region containing thousands of
species in the flora of the mainlands. If now we exclude all those
species which are halophytes and which have most probably been con-
veyed by the aid of sea-water, we shall have only 15 (28) species of
phanerogams carried by the winds, and 9 (18) transported by birds.
Only these and the cryptogams are of interest here as, for various
reasons, transport by sea currents is excluded in the Jones Sound islands.
We thus see that, even in the tropics, migration by aid of the wind is
restricted to spores of cryptogams and to a very small number of seeds
1) Treus, M., Notice sur la nouvelle flore de Krakatau. Ann. du Jard. botan. de
Buitenzorg, Vol. VII, 1888.
2
18 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM
of higher plants. Neither does immigration by means of birds play any
prominent part, and I think it is only to the circumstance that Castle
and Devil’s Islands serve as rookeries, that they owe their comparatively
large stock of plants which have been brought over as nest-building
material.
Had they been encircled by a less strong current, so that the sea
might have been icebound for the greater part of the year the flora
would probably have been somewhat different. There would have been no
rookeries, the birds would not have contributed much to the immigration
of plants, but, on the other hand, there would have been another means
of migration — the wind-transport over the snow-covered ice in winter.
I have more than once seen that plant fragments are whirled away for
long distances over the hard-blown snow, and I do not doubt. that this
means of transport plays a prominent part in the migration of arctic
plants, many of which are ,,winter-standers*. 1 also think that the
island of North Kent in part has to thank the fast-bound ice at its
northern parts, for the relatively rich flora it possesses. The ice here
forms a bridge which may facilitate immigration both from Ellesmere-
land, N. Devon, and other islands to the west. However, the geological
nature of the northern parts of the island also is different and more
favorable than that in Castle and Devil’s Islands.
Ill. North Kent.
Separated from Ellesmereland by the Hell Gate, and from North
Devon by Cardigan Strait, the island of North Kent extends between lat.
76° 27’ and 51°, and long. 89° 45’ and 90° 35’. The northern part of
it has been known since the time of Betcuer’s expedition. It was
visited by Mr. Scuer in 1900, but he brought home neither notes nor
collections. In 1901 I visited the northern part (July 13), and in 1902
some points on the south coast.
The southern part of the island is built up of Silurian limestone of
the better, less siliciferous kind; further north, comes the same series of
limestones and sandstones as in Goose Fjord. Loose deposits are present
to a large extent, forming a far better soil than that in the last-mentioned
small islands. The coast of N. Kent is, for the greater part, formed of
high, more or less abrupt cliffs rising to a height of perhaps 1000 feet.
In some places, there is a narrow, low beach below and a few valleys
trending inland, but rising rather precipitously towards the undulating,
18981902. No. 19.] STRAY CONTRIBUT.TO THE BOTANY OF N.DEVON. 19
higher land of the interior which, in the more elevated southern portion,
is covered with a large snow field and sends out a glacier down to Cardigan
Strait and some small hanging-glaciers into some of the ravines.
During my first visit to North Kent, when I had not yet seen Castle
Island, I thought it very poor land, and I have specially noted that it
was far poorer than the neighbouring part of Ellesmereland which shows
the same geological character. The fact that it is more difficult for
plants to reach the convenient growing-places here than on the mainland,
seems to accounl for the relative scarcity of species of higher plants.
The vegetation was, however, dense enough in favorable spots.
The place (1.) which I visited, July 13, 1901, lies about halfway
between De Lacy Head and the easternmost point of the island. From
the narrow strip of foreland, a small valley or broad ravine trended
steeply upwards to the interior plateau. The loose strata, for the greater
part, consisted of gravel with numerous stones of all sizes, with, in some
places, also a considerable admixture of clayish material, and locally
pure clay, especially along the broad shallow brooks which flowed down
from the interior. In the high land of the interior also, there was the
same gradual transition from shingle fields to clay plains strewn with
stones, or wet clay plains with open an vegetation. In some places, the
rock was uncovered or only overlaid with heaps of stones of different
sizes, somewhat resembling the talus below the steeper cliffs.
Among the plants of the lower land, Saxifraga oppositifolia was
absolutely predominant, and it was abundant even in the interior, appe-
aring with flowers of very different size, shape, and colour in different
individuals. Another species, very common in all moist localities, was
Saxifraga flagellaris, and the genus was further represented by 4 more
species, S. nivalis, S. stellaris var. comosa, S. groenlandica, and S.
cernua. Other plants found here were: — Dryas integrifolia, Poten-
tilla pulchella, P. emarginata, Draba alpina with its var. gracilescens,
D. subcapitata, Cochlearia officinalis var. groenlandica, Papaver radt-
catum, Ranunculus nivalis, R. Sabinei, Cerastium alpinum, Stellaria
longipes, Alsine verna, Oxyria digyna, Salix arctica, Luzula arcuata
var. confusa, L. nivalis, Festuca ovina, Poa abbreviata, Glyceria
distans, Catabrosa algida, Aira caespitosa var. arctica, Alopecurus
alpinus. Cerastium alpinum showed the same transition, from large,
hairy forms to the extreme f. pulvinatwm, as found in some loca-
lities in Ellesmereland. Most of the 28 species enumerated above are
included in a little collection in alcohol, which was all I could bring
home of flowering plants (2832).
20 H. G. SIMMONS. [SEC. ARCT. EXP.FRAM
In general, the flowering plants appeared in single tufts or indi-
viduals in the open, bare ground; only
— 31 Messungen — Larix sibirica, Picea obovata (wahrscheinlich auch Picea eaxcelsa, norwegischen Ursprungs) — Stamm- holz — 1,17 mm. In allen bisher untersuchten Treibhélzersammlungen hat es sich er- wiesen, dass die Nadelhélzerproben der Anzahl nach den Laubhdlzer- proben weit tiberlegen gewesen sind. Dieser Umstand diirfte wohl ausserst davon abhangen, dass die Treibhélzer aus waldigen Gegenden mit einer tberwiegenden Anzahl von Nadelhélzern stammen, aber es dirfte auch — und zwar nicht zum geringsten Teile — durch die ungleiche Trans- portdienlichkeit der beiden Holzarten in Wasser erklart werden kénnen. Das Nadelholz durfte dank seiner Harte, Starke und seinem grossen Reichtum an Harz, welches alle befindlichen Porositaéten impragniert und zustopft, weit mehr zu einem langwierigen Wassertransport geeignet sein, als zahlreiche Laubhiélzer, wie die Sahlweide, die Pappel u. a., deren Holz bedeutend mehr pords und harzarm ist, und denen es darum so zu sagen an Harzpropfen fir alle die zahlreichen und grossen Kanile mangelt. die das Innere des Holzes durchziehen. Infolgedessen dirfte dieses Holz leichter als Nadelholz von Wasser durchtrinkt werden und sinken. 1F, R. Kserumay, Fanerogamfloran pa Novaja Semlja, och Wateatscu, Vega- expeditionens vetenskapliga iakttagelser, I bd., sid. 351, Stockholm 1882. 2 F. Inevarson |. c. p. 82. 3 Linpman, I. ¢. p. 27. 4 Orrensiap, |. ¢. p. 7. 5 Inevarson, |. c. p. ‘60. 8 FREDRIK INGVARSON. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM Einige Ziffern, welche die Proportion zwischen Nadelhélzern und Laubhdlzern in verschiedenen Treibhélzersammlungen beleuchten, werden im nachstehenden Schema angefihrt. , Gréss der ° Nadel- Laub- Fundort. Saminlunies hélzer. | hélzer. 933 175 58 Nordéstliches Grénland. (Vom Verf. untersucht.) 172 150 22 Spitzbergen mit umliegenden Inseln. (Verf.) 429 96 95 Siidliches Gronland. (Orrensxap.) 39 31 8 Jan Mayen. (Verf.) %5 22 3 Ostliches Gronland. (Kravs.) 18 18 0 Spitzbergen. (Acarpu.) Die Treibhélzer auf dem Ellesmere-Land. Fundorte. Diese sind in aller Kirze die bisher gekannten Sachverhialtnisse betreffend die Transportbahnen, den Ursprung, die Zusammensetzung der arktischen Treibhélzer. Ein weiterer Beitrag zu diesen Fragen wird von den Treibhélzern geliefert, welche von der SveRpRup’schen Polar- expedition am Ellesmere-Land 1898—1902 eingesammelt worden sind. Die Einsammlung dieser Proben ist zum aller gréssten Teile von Smmmons - gemacht. An 8 verschiedenen Orten wurden Treibhélzerproben ange- troffen. Hier unten wird ein Bericht der Namen und der Lage dieser Fundorte geliefert, nebst den’ Nummern der Treibhélzerproben, welche da eingesammelt worden sind. No. 2986. Die Gansebucht. (,Gaasefjorden“.) » 2840. do. » 2985. do. » 3239. do. » 3802. do. » 2987, do. » 2763. do. oberhalb der Flutlinie. ~ 2661. do. » 2984. do. » 2014. do. » 2015. do. oberhalb der Flutlinie. » 2417. Ostlich von der Miindung der Bootsbucht (,Baads- fjorden“) auf einer Kiesterrasse ein paar Meter oberhalb der Flutlinie. » 2115. do. do. 1898—1902. No. 24.] DIE TREIBHOLZER AUF DEM ELLESMERE-LAND. 9 No. 1247. Die Alexandrabucht. » 2041. Die Siidkapsbucht ca. 5 Meter oberhalb der Flutlinie. » 2839. Die dussere Walrossbucht (,Hvalrosfjorden“) ober- halb der Flutlinie. » 2116. Die Moskusbucht. » 3966. N. Devon, der Belcherberg am Cardigan-Sund. » 689. Siidlich von der Bays Bucht, an der Westkiiste vom Ellesmere-Land, auf einer Kiesterrasse in einer Héhe - von 200—300 Fuss tiber dem Meere. Nur 1 Probe ist von der Westkiiste des Ellesmere-Lands mit- genommen worden, naimlich die Probe No. 689, vom Rittmeister IsacHseN stidich von der Bays-Bucht gefunden, Sie lag, wie oben erwahnt, auf einer Kiesterrasse, deren Hihe tiber dem Meere man von 200 bis 300 Fuss schatzt, und zwar nicht isoliert, sondern einer grésseren Treib- hélzersammlung angehérend. Leider hatte IsacHsen keine Gelegenheit mehr als diese einzige Probe mitzunehmen. Von der Ostkiste des Ellesmere-Landes hat man auch nur 1 Probe erhalten. Sie wurde von Simmons in der Alexandrabucht gefunden. Eine Probe hat man von N. Devon, vom Belcher-Berge am Cardigan-Sund erhalten. Alle ubrigen Proben sind in Buchten im westlichen Teile des Jones- Sundes genommen. Die zusammengebrachte Treibhélzersammlung besteht aus etwa zwanzig Nummern mit ca. 40 verschiedenen Proben. Wenn eine Num- mer mehrere verschiedene Proben umfasst, sind diese vom Verf. mit Buchstaben bezeichinet. Ausser drei unter der Nummer 2116 in der Moskus-Bucht einge- sammelten Proben, die an der Aussenseite Spuren von menschlicher Be- arbeitung zeigten, und somit aus der Treibhdlzersammlung forteliminiert werden mussten, erwiesen sich alle als typische Treibhélzerproben. Sie bestanden teils aus kirzeren Stammsticken, welche an beiden Enden unebene Bruchflachen zeigten und deren Aste nahe am Stamme abgenutzt waren, teils aus grésseren oder kleineren, aus einem grésseren Stocke tangentiell abgesprengten Holzsplittern, teils aus Stamm- und Wurzel- asten. Das Aussere des Holzes war glatt, bisweilen glinzend und von graulichem Farbentone, welcher bei einigen Proben in reines Silberweiss hintitberging, ein Kennzeichen, welches darauf deutet, dass die Treib- hélzer lange im Wasser gelegen haben. Samtliche Proben, mit Ausnahme von zwei, erwiesen sich als Nadelhdlzer. Die Laubhélzerproben wurden beide in der Gansebucht (,, Gaasefjorden“) angetroffen. 10 FREDRIK INGVARSON. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM Die Treibhélzersammlung von Ellesmere-Land scheint also hin- sichtlich der Proportion zwischen Nadelhélzern und Laubhdélzern den- selben Gesetzen wie die ibrigen. Treibhélzersammlungen zu folgen. (Siehe p. 8.) Breite der Jahrringe. Auch in anderen Beziehungen als in den oben erwihnten herrscht Ahnlichkeit zwischen dieser und anderen Treibhélzersammlungen. Der Mittelwert der Jahrringe im Stammholz der Nadelbiume ist also ausser- ordentlich gering und deutet darauf, dass die Mutterbaiume in einem arktischen Klima gewachsen sind. Im beigefiigten Schema wird eine Totaliibersicht iber die Mittelbreite der Jahrringe in Wurzel und Stamm der Nadelhélzer geliefert. Alle Masse sind in mm. angegeben. Tabelle iiber die Mittelbreite der Jahrringe: Stamm- u. Wurzelholz. é| 55 lg sslS| fe | oe eee ale Ga | Se | es leas Ey ¢ Anmerkungen. z SE Pe SSE Els ah ae Lee ie 23) 2 lS ze | 43 |Sc s5\n|5 mm. mm. 7 2640 B 45 15 | 0383) 1) - | Stammfragment, centrale Jahrringe fehlen. 1949 ea.s0| 29 | 030/11 - ee mit centralen Jahrringen (Alexandra Bucht). 2640C |) 35 15 | 042; 1 - | Stammfragment, centrale Jahrringe fehlen. 2640E | 26 12 | 046 1) - +3 7 | Radius der 50 centralen Jahrringe = 20 mm. 9640A |.115 | 55 047) 1) - | {Radius der 50 folgenden Jahrringe = 25 mm. Radius der 15 dussersten Jahrringe = 10 mm. 2640 D 83 42 | 0,51 1) - | Stammfragment, centrale Jahrringe fehlen. 2840B | 26 20 | 0,76) 1! - 4 5 2115 47 | 8 | 0,74] 1 | - 7 " 2763 36 29 | 0,81 | 1 é am 9640 F 50 40 08 | 1) - | Stammfragment mit centralen Jahrringen. 689B |e:a.25 | 35 | 14 | 4) - " » Bays: Bach Holz sehr vermodert. 2117 19 40 | 210) 1) - | Stammfragm. mit wahrsch, intermediaren Jahrringen. 2984 17 40 | 235 1) - Stammstock noch im Besitze des Marks; Holz weiss. 2985B | 28 56 | 2438 1 | - ‘ * ‘ 2839 =} era. 75 | 40 | 0,53 | - | 1) Der langste Radius 40mm.; der kiirzeste Radius 17 mm. 9840 4 31 | og2|- 1/4 4 » 984mm.; - P 10 mm. \Holz intensiv rotgefiirbt. Q0I5A (ea. 86} 46 | 1,27) -/1 Holz rétlich. 2987A 380 | 60 | 2 - | 1] Holz intensiv rotgefirbt. Bose & es |120 | 2.08 1 . _ ; der langste Radius 130 mm. : Der kiirzeste Radius 20 mm. 1898—1902. No.24.] DIE TREIBHOLZER AUF DEM ELLESMERE-LAND. 11 Wie die Tabelle zeigt, ist die Mittelbreite der Jahrringe fur die resp. Stammholzproben im allgemeinen sehr gering. Die Grenzwerte sind 0,33 mm. und 2,43 mm. Die meisten Proben sind indessen nur Frag- mente, entweder von den dusseren periferen oder den inneren centralen Teilen des Stammes, und enthalten nur eine geringe Anzahl von den Jahrringen des Mutterbaumes. Eine solehe Probe kann also kaum den korrekten Wert fiir die Mittelbreite samtlicher Jahrringe des betreffenden Mutterbaumes geben. Werden namlich nur die periferen und somit die schmilsten Jahrringe eines Baumes der Berechnung vom Mittelwert der simtlichen Jahrringe des Mutterbaumes zu Grunde gelegt, so wird dieser Wert wahrscheinlich zu gering, wie anderseits ein Wert zu hoch wird, der nur auf der Berechnung von den breiteren, also den inter- mediiren Jahrringen eines Baumes basiert wird. Man dirfte daher einem wirklichen Normalmittelwert am néchsten kommen, indem man das aritmetische Medium von den respektiven Mittelwerten siémtlicher Proben berechnet. Der Normalmittelwert zeigte sich dann 0,99 mm. zu sein. (Nach 14 Proben berechnet.) Denselben Mittelwert erhielt OrTensLap bei seinen Messungen an Treibhélzern aus dem siidwestlichen Grénland. Fir das Stammholz be- rechnet dirfte doch dieser Wert zu hoch sein, weil ORTENBLAD zwischen Stamm- und Wurzelholz keinen Unterschied gemacht hat, was aller Wahrscheinlichkeit nach fiir das Stammholz ein noch geringeres Resultat gegeben hitte. Nach der Tabelle des Verf.1, welche sich auf die Treibhélzer aus Spitzbergen, Jan Mayen und dem nordéstlichen Grénland (die Nar- Horst’ sche Treibhélzersammlung) bezieht, waren die Grenzwerte fir Stamm- holz 0,45 mm. und 2,6 mm., der Mittelwert 1,17 mm. (nach 31 Proben berechnet). Auch dieser Wert dirfte als Normalmittelwert betrachtet zu hoch sein, weil die Messungen nur an solchen Proben gemacht worden sind, welche den stirksten Zuwachs anzeigten. Zablreiche Proben miissen ausser Berechnung gelassen werden, weil die Jahrringe so schmal waren, dass ihre Anzahl nicht mit Loupe geschatzt werden konnte. Fur die Jahrringe des Wurzelholzes waren die Grenzwerte 0,53 mm., 203 mm.; der Mittelwert 1,33 mm. (nach 5 Proben berechnet). In der Tabelle des Verf. tber Wurzelholz in der Treibhélzersammlung Nat- Horst?’s waren die Grenzwerte 0,31 mm., 5,2 mm.; der Mittelwert 1,38 mm. (nach 17 Proben berechnet). In beiden diesen Treibhilzersammlungen (in der Sverprur’schen und der NarHorst’schen) sowohl als in den tbrigen, wo man zwischen 1 Inevarson 1. e. p. 60. 12 FREDRIK INGVARSON. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM Wurzelholz und Stammbholz einen Unterschied gemacht hat (LinpMan, Kraus), hat es sich erwiesen, dass der Wert fir die Mittelbreite der Jahrringe grésser im Wurzelholz als im Stammbholz ist. Diese Berech- nungen beziehen sich besonders auf die Lirchen. Systematische Bestimmung der Treibhélzerproben. I. Nadelh6lzer. Mit Ausnahme von zwei Proben waren, wie oben erwihnt, simtliche Treibhélzerproben Nadelhélzer. Bei der mikroskopischen Untersuchung hat es sich erwiesen, dass alle diese Nadelhélzer zu demselben anato- mischen Typus, namlich zum Laria-Picea-Typus, gerechnet werden konnten. Dieser Typus wird bekanntlich von folgenden histologischen Charakteren gekennzeichnet: Harzkanile von zwei Arten, teils vertikal zwischen den Holzzellen, teils horizontal innerhalb der spulférmigen Mark- strahlen. Markstrahlen tangentiell, teils einreihig, teils mehrreihig (spul- formig). Markstrahl teils aus: tracheidalen, teils aus parenchymatischen Elementen bestehend. Die parenchymatischen Elemente mit kleinen elliptischen oder runden Tipfeln versehen, gewohnlich 4—6 auf der vier- eckigen Wandfliche, welche entsteht, wo ein Markstrahl einen Tracheid kreuzt. Der Larix-Picea-Typus enthalt bekanntlich zwei Gattungen: Larix, Picea. Das Holz dieser beiden Gattungen durch eine vollig zuverlassige histologische Diagnose zu unterscheiden ist in Betracht des grossen Unterschieds, welcher zwischen diesen in morphologischer Hinsicht herrscht, seit langer Zeit ein ersehntes Ziel gewesen, auf dessen Ver- wirklichung eine grosse Arbeit verwendet worden ist. In meiner friiher citierten Arbeit liegt ein ausfihrlicher Bericht tiber diese Untersuchungen vor. Die eigenen Untersuchungen des Verfassers in dieser Sache be- ziehen sich auf die Struktur der Hoftiipfel in den Wassermarkstrahl- zellen des Stammholzes. Nur Stammholz — weder Ast- noch Wurzel- holz — wurde untersucht. Untersuchte Arten waren Larix europea DC., L. americana Micux., L. sibirica Lepes., Picea excelsa Linx. Ich unterschied zwei Tiipfelformen, namlich den Lariav-Tipfel und den Picea-Tiipfel, von welchem der erstere die Lirche, der letztere die Fichte charakterisiert. Die Struktur dieser Tipfelformen habe ich an Radialschnitten des Holzes, aber nur an typischem Frihholz, wahrge- 1898—1902. No. 24.) DIE TREIBHOLZER AUF DEM ELLESMERE-LAND. 13 nommen, und an solchen Durchschnittsbildern, welche den Tiipfel in seiner Mittelachse, d. h. diametral, durchgeschnitten zeigten!. War der Schnitt nicht diametral, sondern neben dem Durchmesser des Tiipfels angebracht, erschien die Tiipfelmiindung kleiner und enger. Da ich in meiner friher citierten Arbeit? die Tupfelformen be- schrieben habe, will ich hier unten ihre Struktur nur in aller Kirze rekapitulieren : Im Larix-Tipfel ist die Tipfel-Miindung weit mit relativ dinner und feiner Tipfelnaht; der Picea-Tiipfel aber besitzt enge Tupfelmiin- _dung mit relativ dicker und grober Tiipfelnaht. In dem Lariax-Tiipfel habe ich gefunden, dass die Mittelproportion zwischen den Durchmessern der Schliesshaut und der Tiipfelmiindung oder, mit andern Worten, dass die Mittelproportion zwischen den Durchmessern des ausseren und des inneren Tipfelkreises 2,65: 1 ist, fiir den Picea-Tiipfel aber 8,62 : 1, wobei der Durchmesser des inneren Tupfelkreises, das heisst der Tiipfel- miindung, als Einer gesetzt worden ist. — Mit diesen Messungen habe ich meine Auffassung angeben wollen, dass im Lariv-Tipfel der Durch- messer des dusseren Tupfelkreises im Verhiltnis zu dem des inneren kleiner als im Picea-Tiipfel ist. Gegen die Aufstellung von diesen Tiipfelformen sind von 0. G. Perersen? Einwendungen gemacht worden. Er hat zwar die eine so- wohl als die andere Tupfelform wahrnehmen kinnen, aber er hat sie nicht konstant gefunden, sondern in einander tbergehend. An den Text- figuren, die seiner Arbeit (p. 67) beigefiigt sind, hat er also den Laria- Tiipfel des Verfassers an den Bildern [a., Ib. konstatiert (,,Tager vi f. Eks. Lariwv-Billederne a. och b., vil den angivne karakter treede ret tydeligt frem ved Sammenligning med flere av Picea-Billederne“) und den Picea-Tiipfel an den Bildern ILb., If f. (,Av Picea-Billederne er vel b. og £. de mest karakteristiske; de ovrige forekommer mig egentlig ikke videre egnede til at anskueliggjore den nevnte Forskel*.) Gegen diese Ausserung Perersen’s will ich betonen, dass ich diesen Formen selbst absolute Konstanz nicht guerkannt habe, was aus fol- gendem Citat aus meiner Arbeit p. 26 hervorgehen dirfte: ,Dessa por- former aro tamligen‘ konstanta, atminstone betraffande Pécea-poren; 1 In einem diametralen Durchschnittsbild tritt der Torus deutlich hervor, in einem Umfang grosser als der Durchmesser der Tipfelmiindung. In Fig. 1, p. 9 in meiner frither citierten Arbeit ist der Torus durch Ubersehen nicht gezeichnet. 2 Inevarson |. c. pp. 25, 26. 27. 3 Perersen, Den diagnostiske adskillelse av rodgranens og lerkens ved. (Forst- botaniske Undersogelser 1906, S. 64.) 4 Das Wort ist erst in vorliegender Arbeit gesperrt. 14 FREDRIK INGVARSON. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM Larix-porens struktur ater synes 1 viss man betingas av cellvaiggarnas tjocklek“. Zwar habe ich mit diesen Worten zuerst hervorheben wollen, dass der Charakter des Larix-Tipfels, als Typus betrachtet, in den Wassermarkstrahlzellen des Spatholzes, welche gribere Zellwande als die des Frihholzes haben, ausgewischt wird, aber anderseits ist es ziemlich gewiss, dass der Typus in der intermediaéren Zone, welche in wohl entwickeltem Stammholz zwischen dem eigentlichen Frih- und Spatholz oft vorhanden ist, wenn nicht direkt ausgewischt, so doch wenigstens geschwacht wird. Unzweifelhaft giebt es, wie es aus einigen der Bilder Perersen’s hervorgeht, auch im typischen Frithholz Ubergangsformen zwischen den Twpfeltypen. Mit anderen Worten, inter- mediare, fiir die Gattungsdiagnose vollstindig indifferente Tupfelformen giebt es bei sowohl Fichten als Larchen. Diese intermediaren Tiipfel- formen werden dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die EKigenschaften, welche die Weite der Tiipfelmiindung, die Dicke der Tiipfelnaht und die Pro- portion zwischen den beiden Durchmessern der Tiipfelkreise bestimmen, nicht in derselben Weise wie bei den Extrem-Tupfeln kombiniert sind. Ein extremer Picea-Tiipfel hat also eine enge Tiipfelmiindung, eine dicke, grobe Tiipfelnaht und die Proportion zwischen den Durchmes- sern der Tiipfelkreise (5—13,9) : 14. Kin Ewtrem-Larixv-Tipfel hat eine weite Tiipfelmtindung, eine etwas zugespitzte Tiipfelnaht und die Proportion zwischen den Durchmessern der Tiipfelkreise (1,7—4) : 1. Intermediaére Formen aber haben entweder 1) enge Tiipfel- miindung (Picea-Charakter) und etwas zugespitzte Tiipfelnaht (Laria- Charakter) oder 2) weite Tiipfelmiindung (Lariw-Charakter) und dicke, grobe Tiipfelnaht (Picea-Charakter). Ich will gern einréumen, dass es wiinschenswert gewesen ware, wenn diese intermediaren Ttpfelformen in meiner friheren Arbeit ausdriick- licher hervorgehoben und genauer angegeben worden waren. Dass dies nicht geschehen ist, beruht darauf, dass der Verf. diese Tiipfelformen bei der Gattungsdiagnose nicht mit in Betracht genommen, sondern diese ausschliesslich auf den Extrem-Tiipfeln basiert hat. Unter den Figuren Perersen’s gibt es nur eine, welche nach der Ansicht des Verf. die Struktur des Laria-Tiipfels deutlich angiebt, namlich Fig. 1b (besonders der mittlere Tiipfel), und unter den Picea-Twipfeln ebenfalls nur einen Typus, namlich der mittlere Tupfel in Fig. II f£. — Fig. Il b méchte wohl zunachst einem Picea-Tiipfel entsprechen, ob- gleich sie uns das Bild eines typischen Picea-Tiipfels nicht giebt. Vor 1 Vgl. die Angaben in meiner friiher angef. Arbeit, pp. 26, 27! 1898— 1902. No, 24.) DIE TREIBHOLZER AUF DEM ELLESMERE-LAND. 15 allen Dingen ist die Tupfelmiindung an der linken Seite der Figur etwas zu weit, ausserdem ist die betreffende Figur assymetrisch, insofern dass die rechte Tupfelhalfte der anderen nicht ganz ahnlich ist. Von allen den Figuren, die uns p. 67 in der Arbeit Perersen’s gegeben werden, hatte der Verf. also nur auf zwei die Gattungsdiagnose zu basieren gewagt, namlich auf Fig. Ib (Larix-Tipfel) und auf dem mittleren Tiipfel in Fig. II £. (Picea-Tipfel). Vergleichen wir diese beiden Figuren, von welchen ja nach der Ansicht des Verf. jede ihr Extrem reprisentiert, so sehen wir sogleich, dass sie einander sehr unadholich sind, dass eine Verwechselung zwischen ihnen kaum méglich ist. Aus dem Gesichtspunkte der Ahnlichkeit giebt es also wohl schwerlich ein Hindernis fir die Verwendung der resp. Extreme als ,,Gattungstipfel*. — Kine andere und zwar sehr bedenkliche Sache ware es, wenn von den beiden Tipfelformen nicht jede fi ihre Baumart typisch wire, sondern wenn sie vollstindig unregelmassig durcheinandergemischt vorkéimen. Nach der Ansicht des Verf. verhalt es sich doch nicht so. Wenigstens ist der Laria-Tupfel Fig. Ib fir Larix ganz besonders charakteristisch. Wie ich es von der Figurenkarte p. 67 verstanden habe, ist PETERSEN derselben Ansicht. Wenn wir namlich diese Karte etwas genauer unter- suchen, so finden wir bald, dass unter den Figuren der Gruppe II (Picea- Tupfel) keine vorkommt, welche mit Fig. Ib (= extremer Lari«-Tupfel) verwechselt werden kénnte. — Etwas bedenklicher stellt sich vielleicht die Sache hinsichtlich dem Picea-Tiipfel. Dieser diirfte vielleicht in seinem extremen Typus oder wenigstens in einer intermediaren Form, welche demselben sehr ahnelt, auch bei Larix vorkommen. Unzweifel- haft ist doch der Picea-Tiipfel fiir Picea charakteristisch, auch wenn er bei Larix sporadisch angetroffen werden kénnte. Diese Tiipfelform diirfte uns indessen keine so vollstindig sichere Diagnose der Picea wie der Laria-Tipfel der Larix geben kinnen. Der Verf. hat sich bei der Gattungsbestimmung dieser Methode bedient: Wenn Laria- Tupfel in grésserer Menge angetroffen wurden, dann wurde die Gattung als Laria festgestellt; wenn Larix-Tipfel vollstandig fehlten, Picea- Tupfel aber in reichlicher Menge vorkamen, wurde die Diagnose auf Picea festgestellt. Durch meine Messungen habe ich, wie oben erwahnt, beweisen wollen, dass im Laria-Tipfel der Durchmesser des ausseren Tupfel- kreises im Verhaltnis zu dem des inneren Tiipfelkreises kleiner als im Picea-Tiipfel ist. (Laria-Tipfel 2,65:1; Picea-Tiipfel 8,62: 1, wobet der Durchmesser des inneren Tuipfelkreises, das heisst der Tiipfelmindung, als Einer gesetzt worden ist). Durch seine Messungen hat PETERSEN 16 FREDRIK INGVARSON. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM diese meine Auffassung gewissermassen bestitigt. So hat er fir den Laria-Tipfel den Wert 7,68: 1, fir den Picea-Tipfel aber 8,61: 1 er- halten. Obwohl Persrsen also fiir den Lariax-Tipfel einen weit hoheren Wert als der Verf., und also einen weit geringeren Unterschied zwischen den beiden Galtungen in diesem Falle erhalten hat, so stimmen doch unsere resp. Messungen in der Hinsicht tberein, welche hier als das wesentliche betrachtet werden muss, nimlich darin, dass wir beide fir den Durchmesser des dusseren Tipfelkreises geringeren Wert bei Laria als bei Picea erhalten haben. Wie man sieht, existiert hinsichtlich des Larix-Tipfels ein bedeu- tender Unterschied in unseren Angaben. Médglicherweise beruht dies darauf, dass die Messungen PETERSEN’s, wie er selbst vermutet, nicht so zahlreich wie die des Verf. gewesen sind: ,[NGvarsons Maalinger er ganske vist paa dette specielle Punkt betydeligt talrigere end mine, men det har dog forekommet mig at vere nogen Grund til at navne disse“ © (p. 68), oder auch darauf, dass Perersen wahrscheinlich seine Messungen hauptséchlich auf die Mittelformen, der Verf. aber auf die Extreme basiert hat. Ware diese letztere Annahme die richtige, so miisste natirlich der Picea-Tiipfel in oben erwahnter Hinsicht viel weniger als der Lariax-Tipfel variieren. Wir hatten namlich fiir den Picea-Tipfel beinahe denselben Wert, fir den Larix-Tupfel aber verschiedene Werte erhalten. Vorausgesetzt, dass wir unsere Zellenmessungen auf verschiedene Tiipfelformen basiert haben: PrTersen auf die intermediiren, der Verf. auf die extremen — was meiner Ansicht nach héchst wahrscheinlich ist —, so dirfte wohl eine vergleichende Untersuchung ‘von unseren resp. Messungsresultaten eher zum Bestairken als zum Widerlegen meiner Auffassung hinsichtlich der Konstanz der Tipfelformen geeignet sein, wie diese in meiner friher citrerten Arbeit (p. 26) formuliert worden ist: ,Dessa porformer fro timligen konstanta, Atminstone hetraffande Picea-poren, Larix-porens struktur ater synes mig i viss man betingas av cellvaggarnas tjocklek“. Es sind keine neuen Untersuchungen, welche der Antwort auf die Kritik Perersen’s zu Grunde liegen, auch ist es keineswegs ein Versuch den Wert derselben zu vermindern. Der Verf. hat mit diesen Zeilen nur die Punkte seiner friheren Darstellung, die undeutlich waren oder missverstanden werden konnten, verdeutlichen und erkliren wollen, zum Beispiel die Fragen von der Konstanz der Tiipfelformen, von den Tipfel- formen, auf welche der Verf. die Gattungsdiagnose basiert hat. 1898—1902. No.24.] DIE TREIBHOLZER AUF DEM ELLESMERE.-LAND. 17 Der Verf. hat die Frage zu erneuerter Untersuchung nicht aufnehmen wollen, weil ihm Zeit und Gelegenheit dazu fehlten und vor allem, weil die erwahnten Tipfelformen, nach dem was schon in meiner friiheren Arbeit betont wurde, sich nur auf Stammholz, méglicherweise auch auf Wurzelholz, aber nicht auf Astholz beziehen. Die Tupfelformen werden also immer nur einen relativen Wert haben, auch wenn ihre Giiltigkeit hinsichtlich des Stammholzes noch so bestimmt festgestellt wurde. _ Whe die Sache jetzt steht, dirfte die Diagnose zwischen Larche und Fichte nicht nur auf einem Charakter basiert werden kénnen, der fir sowohl Stammholz und Wurzelholz als Astholz gilt. Es ist méglich, dass ein solcher nie aufgewiesen werden kann. Es scheint mir eher, als waren alle holzanatomischen Differenzen zwischen den in morpho- logischer Hinsicht so verschiedenen Holzarten nur graduell, zahlreiche Zwischenformen vermittelnd. Hiermit ist aber nicht gesagt, dass man in keinem Falle das Larchenholz vom Fichtenholz unterscheiden kénnte. Abgesehen von den obenerwahnten extremen Tiipfelformen giebt es in den Dimensions- und Formenverhaltnissen der Zellen gewisse Méglichkeiten, die beiden Baumarten zu unterscheiden. Das Holz von einem kréaftigen und tppigen Larchenstamme kann in der Regel unter dem Mikroskop vom Fichtenholz ohne Schwierigkeit unterschieden werden, Dank den kihnen und kraftigen Dimensionen, die seine histologischen Elemente auszeichnen. Von BurcersTeIn ! liegt eine monographische Arbeit in dieser Frage vor, in welcher er auf der Grundlage von Zellenmessungen Larchen von Fichten zu unterscheiden versucht. Er ist bei seinen Untersuchungen zu dem Resullat gekommen, dass eine histologische Diagnose nicht nur auf ein einzelnes Kennzeichen, wohl aber auf eine Kombination von mehreren Kennzeichen basiert werden kann. Diese Kennzeichen be- ziehen sich auf den radialen Querdurchmesser des Lumens der Frih- tracheiden auf die Verteilung der Hoftipfel an den Radialwanden der Frihtracheiden, auf die Mittelhéhe der parenchymatischen Markstrahl- zellen, auf die Mittelhohe der Markstrahlen (parenchymatische Elemente incl. Quertracheiden). Seine Beobachtungen hat er in eine analytische Bestimmungstabelle fir Fichten und Larchen zusammengefasst. Diese Tabelle wird hier unten zum Vergleiche mit den Messungen, die der Verf. auf arktischem Material angestellt hat, in extenso wiedergegeben. Mit Riicksicht auf meine Aufgabe, den Wachsort dieser Treibhélzer festzustellen, war es fir mich von grésster Bedeutung, wie ich spiter 1 Burcersrein, Vergleichende anatomische Untersuchungen des. Fichten- und Larchenholzes (Denkschriften der Wiener Akademie, 60 Bd., 1893). 9 18 FREDRIK INGVARSON. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM zeigen werde, diese beiden Baumarten unterscheiden zu kénnen. Oben- erwihnte Tiipfelformen (extreme Lari«-, resp. Picea-Tiipfel) hat der Verf. der Gattungsdiagnose nicht zu Grunde legen wollen, weil sie, wie schon gesagt, nur fiir Stammbholz gelten und ein nicht geringes Prozent dieser Treibhélzerproben aus Wurzelholz und Astholz bestehen, und auch weil der Wert der Tipfelformen als histologische Diagnose bestritten ist. Statt dessen hat der Verf. auf Grundlage von Zellenmessungen nach der analytischen Tabelle Burcerstein’s diese Baumarten von einander zu unterscheiden versucht. Da indessen diese Tabelle nur auf Material aus stidlicheren Breitengraden (Kroatien, Slavonien u. a. Orten)! Beziehung hat, so musste natiirlich ihre Giiltigkeit zuerst an arktischem Material geprobt werden, bevor sie dem Unterscheiden zwischen arktischen Fichten und Larchen zu Grunde gelegt werden konnte. Eine solche Priifung ist dadurch erméglicht, dass eine Sammlung Praparate von arktischen Treibhélzern, die in der Miindung des Jenissei’s eingesammelt sind, sich im Besitze des Verf. befindet. Unter diesen wurden solche zum Lari«-Picea-Typus gehérenden Praparate gewahlt, die nebst Holz auch Rinde enthielten. Da es bekanntlich in der Rinde von Larchen und Fichten sichere Kennzeichen giebt, konnte man also durch die Struktur der Rinde entscheiden, welche Proben zur einen oder anderen Baumart gehérten. An diesen so festgestellten Larchen- und Fichtenholzproben habe ich nach dem Burcerstemn’schen Schema Zellenmessungen bewerk- stelligt. Dabei hat es sich erwiesen, dass simtliche Proben, welche der Rinde nach als Fichten und Liarchen bestimmt wurden, auch nach dem Schema Fichten, resp. Lairchen waren. Dem Resultat dieser Prifung gemiss glaubte der Verf. diese Tabelle auch fiir die Bestimmung von den zum Lariaw-Picea-Typus hoérenden Treibhélzern vom Ellesmere-Land gebrauchen zu kénnen. Messungen sind daher vom Verf. an diesen Treibhélzern nach demselben Prinzip wie die obenerwahnten Kontrollmessungen an den sibirischen Treibhélzern angestellt worden. Hier unten giebt der Verf. eine Serie von Tabellen. Tabelle A. Die Tabelle BurcGerstein’s? in extenso. B. Kontrollmessungen an sibirischen Treibhélzern mit Rinde und Einrangierung der Proben in die Tabelle BurGEersTEtn’s. C. Messungen an den Treibhélzern von Ellesmere-Land und Einrangierung der Proben in die Tabelle Burcerstew’s. ” 1 Ich will erwihnen, dass ich keine Gelegenheit hatte, die Messungen Burcer- srmin’s an Fichten und Larchen aus siidlichen Breitengraden zu kontrollieren, da ich aber seine Angaben nicht bestritten gesehen, habe ich mich im vor- liegenden Falle derselben bedient. 2 Burcerstew, |. c, p. 482. 1898— 1902. No.24.] DIE TREIBHOLZER AUF DEM ELLESMERE.LAND. 19 A. Analytische Bestimmungstabelle des Fichten- und Larchenholzes. I Zwillingstipfel nicht vorhanden. A. Frihtracheiden 0,020—0,040 mm. Mittlere Markstrahlh6he 7—11 Zellen. a) Markstrahlzellhohe 0,017—0,020 mm.; einrethige, mehr als 10 Zellen hohe Markstrahlen bilden circa 20 Prozent aller Mark- strahlen. Markstrahlen selten verharzt. Stammholz Fichte. b) Markstrahlzellhdhe 0,020—0,024 mm. a) Querdurchmesser des ausseren Tupfelhofes meist 0,021— 0,026 mm.; maximale Markstrahlhéhe 30 Zellen; Markstrahlen meist nicht verharzt. Wurzelholz Fichte. 8) Querdurchmesser des dusseren Twpfelhofes meist 0,014— 0,022 mm. (Markstrahlen meist verharzt.) Stammholz Lirche (innerste Jahrringe). B. Frihtracheiden 0,015—0,030 mm. Mittlere Markstrahlhéhe. 45—7 Zellen; maximale Markstrahlhéhe 20 Zellen. a) Frihtracheiden 0,015—0,020 mm.; Querdurchmesser der Tiupfel 0,014—0,017 mm., nmiemals tiber 0,018 mm., Spittracheiden ge- streift. Astholz Fichte. b) Frihtracheiden 0,020—0,030 mm.; Querdurchmesser der Tupfel 0,016—0,024 mm. Spattracheiden gestreift oder nicht gestreift. Astholz Larche. Il. Zwillingstipfel vorhanden. A. Frihtracheiden 0,030—0,040 mm. (Markstrahlen selten verharzt.) a) Markstrahlzellhéhe 0,017—0,020 mm. Querdurchmesser der Tipfel auch unter 0,019 mm. Zwillingstiipfel meist einzeln zwischen einfachen Tupfeln zerstreut, seltener in mehreren tibereinander liegenden Reihen. Stammholz Fichte. b) Markstrahlzellhdhe 0,020—0,026 mm. Die Markstrahl-Leitzellen oft Starke fiihrend. Querdurchmesser der Tiipfel nicht unter 0,019 mm. Doppeltiipfel einzeln oder in mehreren Reihen tiber einander oder die Frihtracheiden ganz bedeckend. Spattracheiden ausnahmsweise gestreift. Wurzelholz Fichte. 20 FREDRIK INGVARSON. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM B. Frihtracheiden 0,040—0,060 mm. Markstrahlen sehr haufig ver- harzt. a) Markstrahlzellhshe 0,020—0,023 mm. Mittlere Markstrahlhohe 9—13 Zellen; maximale Héhe 40—50 Zellen. Die einreihigen, mehr als 10 Zellen hohen Markstrahlen bilden circa 38 Prozent aller Markstrahlen. Querdurchmesser der Tipfel auch unter 0,020 mm. Stammholz Lirche. b) Markstrahlzellhohe 0,024—0,030 mm. Mittlere Markstrahlhéhe 7—9 Zellen; maximale Héhe 30 Zellen. Spattracheiden ausnahms- weise gestreift. Querdurchmesser der Tiipfel nicht unter 0,020 mm. Wurzelholz Larche. ! Tabelle B. a| bl « | ad | e. f. | g. h | i je | ko = i : ia] . = . a Sie jseg#) 3 | 2 elec I alee! Se || ee Sf Se8bs 2 | Bas eng (ESS .88eS8) SEe | Cas Go |tg)e85| 3 oF esti | SO ES stacks) g24 nee <-eran-e| = £ BS o ro hiae Spiaes |S wo as & oa & OBS Eeisaltxe| + 225 Sod | 2a (2s sac 8 ae 8 Fie phen mtrecit nal sg aS es HoK tO ee oy | oe pe ies ae ESE E/E RS) 2 aes Ci 83 (Se gi. 5.25 ee 25 8 NEN FATE & aon ane Ss 2sblaccm Am Ass mm. | mm. | yom | — | + | 0,020 0,038; 6,9 Zellen| 18 Zellen' 0,024; — ITAb | Wurzelholz| Fichte. | Fichte — | + | 0,025. 0,065| 7,8, 30.)—C, 0,027; + IIBb | Wurzelholz| Larche. Larche — | + | 0,024) 0,059) 82 ,, 98 Y 0,025) + IEBb | Wurzelholz| Lirche. | Larche —|+ 0,025 | 0,063 | 7,5 ,, 20 = 0,025; + IIBb | Weiecliale Larche. | | Larche — | + eel 0,063| 7,4 , 380°C, | 0,025; + IIBb ee Wurzelholz Lirche. Larche In dieser Tabelle sowohl als in der folgenden Tabelle C. sind die- selben diagnostischen Charaktere wie in der Tabelle Burcerstetn’s auf- genommen worden, obgleich sie auf eine andere Weise gruppiert sind. Der Ubersichtlicheit wegen sind namlich die resp. Charaktere in Gruppen geordnet und solche Gruppen, die mit einander verwandt sind, zusammen- gefiihrt worden. Also stehen alle Kennzeichen, die sich auf die Tupfel beziehen, in einer Reihenfolge, namlich in den Gruppen a, 0, ¢; alle 1 In der vorstehenden Bestimmungstabelle ist unter dem Ausdruck ,,Friihtracheiden“ der radiale Durchmesser der Friihlingsholzzellen verstanden. Die Angaben be- treffs der Tiipfel beziehen sich auf die an den Radialwinden der Frithtracheiden ausgebildeten Tipfel. Die Markstrahlzellhdhe bezieht sich auf die leitenden (mit einfachen Tiipfeln versehenen) Zellen des Markstrahles. Die Markstrahlhéhe umfasst Leitzellen und Quertracheiden. 1898—1902. No.24.] DIE TREIBHOLZER AUF DEM ELLESMERE-LAND. 91 die Kennzeichen, die sich auf die Markstrahlen beziehen, in einer Folge: e, f, g, h. Gruppe 7 giebt an, welchen Platz die Proben auf Grundlage der Angaben in den friiheren Gruppen in der Tabelle Burcerstemn’s einnehmen; Gruppe j giebt die Diagnose nach der Tabelle Burcerstetn’s an; Gruppe k die Diagnose nach der Untersuchung des Verf. von der Struktur der Rinde. — Jeder Zifferwert ist eine Durchschnittszahl von 20 Messungen, mit Aus- nahme von denen, die in den Gruppen e und f enthalten sind. Die Werte in Gruppe e (mittlere Héhe des Markstrahles) sind Durchschnittszahlen von circa 80 Messungen. Die Hihe der Markstrahlen scheint weit mehr als die tbrigen in der Tabelle angegebenen Charaktere zu variieren, weshalb die mittlere Héhe durch eine gréssere Anzahl von Messungen berechnet werden muss. Die maximale Héhe des Markstrahles ist nach 80 Markstrahlen berechnet. — Dieselben Prinzipien hinsichtlich der Auf- stellung und Berechnung der resp. Durchschnittswerte, die der Tabelle B zu Grunde gelegt worden, gelten auch fir die nachstehende Tabelle C. Was nun die Tabelle B betrifft, so enthalt sie, wie oben erwahnt, Kontrollmessungen an sibirischen, mit Rinde versehenen Treibhélzern. Nur 5 Praparate sind auf diese Weise untersucht worden, weil sie die einzigen waren, welche Rinde enthielten. Aus Gruppe & (Struktur der Rinde) geht hervor, dass ein Praparat Fichtenholz, die tibrigen Liarchen- holz waren. Nach Gruppe j erweist es sich, dass, wenn man die Ziffer- werte der resp. Gruppen fiir jede einzelne Probe nach den Prinzipien der analytischen Methode Burcerstein’s zusammenstellt, auch eine Probe Fichtenholz, die 4 tbrigen Larchenholz sind. Und wenn man schliess- lich die Resultate fur die resp. Proben in den Gruppen j und k ver- gleicht, erweist es sich, dass sie einander entsprechen. Leider sind nur Wurzelholzproben in der Tabelle aufgenommen worden, und dies zwar aus dem Grunde, dass nur vorliegende Wurzel- holzpraparate Rinde enthielten. [SEC. ARCT. EXP. FRAM FREDRIK INGVARSSON. “qorpagds poydnyssary[IaZ, “Syleyy sop aZyIsaq WI 9IO}SWLUILYS ataR'y - \ ‘uapunjad 9j1Q Waapue ue [Yomgo “~GEse eqoig PUY —- LAST. | Mors eq + | BOO “ 9 “HO sHO'O TOO + — “ZpoyyNay | pun -yeds UdYISIMZ VZUAIN) ajlVyos ‘qye3 ZIBET ‘ques ayiey | “yous epupmual[ezZ “pueyoteaqe y eddnin cya | zoymmeg |egy : + | 00; “ og) “ 9BF | Le0'0/ 920'0 | + | — ayoINTyT ‘pusqoraaqe yeddnig gege zpouenm | dan | + | eso) “ 08) “ L | es0'0 e200) + | “yotjands Jaydmssuyyn7, “yasouL Iyas aye] OH “qpeSjor “aeP_ UIEAY-G[aSqons epupanayez| ese | oquuMg | grea, + 100) “ st “ G9 | LOO ec'0 + — “yyleayso3 yreys usplayvely, ‘pusypolamqe J : addniy *yorjayUuNnp apupMUs|[e7 ‘yorpayunp ZLB AL | ayoIeyT ‘(o-[ AVANT) “,uRISpoy* opsiddy ‘zjoyuaqaryy se}oy | V eges 7OUPZMM | dal + soo, “ 9 “LB | G90 GeO'O + — yon] \ pusyoromqe yaddnin) g 078s = Zpoywueys | bq IT | + | goo) “ so) “ BF Sg0'0, t0';0, + “yoljayanp OPURMUIT[OT ‘youpayunp zie ‘Z[0OH ayolny ; P mayqiyjaSjor atsueynr yrur Braazjezin yy soypstddy,) V OFSS |Z1OUPZIMM Ta + een,“ 08 * SB | F900 GOOF ‘pueyotamge y oddnixy ayoiR'y] . “ ; . | ylonsed yes vaproysenyory sje Teds [yomos FT ones ouwMMIS | CATT | + | O00 66 IT | 9400 9600 | + | — ayoINy] ‘pueyoromqe yadduin) q On9s | oquaMs eal ' + lgsroo) “ us| “ at | oso'o|ezoo | + | — ‘puasyoremqe yaddnixy (‘usdsunssay OT youu [yezs}yruyosyoing) ‘wu ¢Zo‘Q = juueT] uea[[PZ uapuedall Japueuls ueqou snipey sap Buny i “any Ul WeMzZ ayo[am ‘pueAA ayeddop vq ‘expC Jayot[JUapsOJassne uOA zjoyyeds ur opuRMUa [eZ ayoIe’y | ‘zjoyyniy pun -yedg ueyostmz alurpzueryy eteyoS | J OPIS Gans Pall | + | 0800 FN°Z 08 | nouez rat \se80'0 £200 | + | = { asegeed “tau “wut cael) we. aoe Ss 5 a m |aedieN ry Bere | EOS [Berserk 2a) eos | FEE | F [SESE S|? S fons | BES |ReSR\Ses|S5 | Fee | PRS | B lrg elon) ow ete Be Bee [Bees FE) Bee | Fa | F EBB Ss) “Gee | gee [ge .die el =| g = | & /88s) s| 3 we f ow Pag = : * | 3 " = f ne | f mn ee ae ee See Se ee ‘OD PTP4deL 23 1898—1902. No. 24.] DIE TREIBHOLZER AUF DEM ELLESMERE-LAND. “UdpIOAL Jlaisuviuta vy f dajun Vv 0496 aqord ata epuniny Ueqjaswep sne Jeqe jst ‘uapiam yaaiBuer | ayyory “ula ‘ompIRT zZjoyjsy = q gq] JejUN yone ajuuey, g e966 «| ZjoywuRyS 0G 920'0 | 610'0 o1ld : : A 0G — Zjoyuruteys aI 180'0 610° : ayy : "V OFS UOA ojuoMSeIT YorulayosaqeAA “YW OF9S =| D OF9G ZpoymWMeyS or 620'0 | 610'0 ‘pusyotamqe y pun ‘a ueddnig ‘UapiaM JesuRiMIe ‘ayaIeyT zjoyysy = q gq] aezuN Yone PywWeRU ajuUgy eqolg sq, }Satpj10a zpoyysy yoru pun zjoymuyys ssep yneiep uajnap aSunaiyep rep | aqyorg | SunpyIMJUy eyasiqjuas pun eqoig Jap uauoisuauq, VY OF9S zZjoywueys ral 1£0‘0 | 610'0 ‘pusyqoteamqe yoddniry yyonspesuamures ayoiey] “NZ INU “FAIpI9A ZY UsploypesysqiayyT Jap apuRM | C GE8S | Z[oypezin A, 0G +400 | 130'0 ‘pusyotamqe y addnig ‘yorayunp z1ey “-yypnap -asuaMUIesNZ INU YYVIpPIas yyotu usprayovsyysqiepy ayrIey ‘(OT NvWaNry) *,UBIS poy" ayosidAy ‘zjoyuaypayy sojoy | -y IOS | Z1049z.1N AW 91 620'0 B60'0 “q[ad epupaualez ‘qies ziepy ‘pplipeszuewmumesnz ina ‘yyIpiea yYyU Gapreyovsy -\SqiaH{ ‘ue STIVHTAZyA AA 4qIS eqo1g 1ap alassny seq! 1) 6E83 é LG 040°0 | 0z0'0 ‘pusyotamqe yoaddniy ‘uayessyrepy eStwigy -juds yone os ‘yoripds ayes ojpueyziepy ‘uneiq ‘]eyUNp epuymualez ‘uneiqjayunp zip] ‘Wyleajsed -[eatds uapleyoery, ‘uunp Ueprayoesyysqiay Jap spur Ad aypIR'y ‘(2 "[ ‘NvWaNrT) *,UeISpoy" oyostdAy ‘zjoyuoqoryy so}0yy 1996 | Zfoyjazin AA or S¢0°0 | ¢60'0 ‘puseyotiamqge y eddnixyy “yoiqjes epugmuarjez ‘yorqiod zp] ‘yleajsesyesids ‘uunp uapleyseiqysqiay] Jap spur AA aypie'y] : ‘(O°[‘NVWGNIT) *,,UeISpoy “ oyosid4y ‘zjoyuatporeT sojoy THOS | ZpOyTazan AA + U2T[°Z, 8S 8c0'0 | ezo‘o | + “wut TOUT | D Ew Qaomss N yo AW iyop< NIPN PEE GSE gepeeeh BF) FE | Eee = bed PEPE SG =-0 ZES 2eon|S#s, 59 | Pap neo B ros eel & ‘uaSunqouuy eeen| geo |Besaiess| FE) SRe | “e. | & gees) 2 aoe Bos ise oust Se Si = & S: '@ sei S| “tt a ce a 5 oa =} on a g |? la > >