CORNELL
LAB of ORNITHOLOGY
LIBRARY
at Sapsucker Woods
Illustration of Bank Swallow by Louis Agassiz Fuertes
MYRTICE A. BLATCHLEY
Yt. (Go blbot Pacer,
| Jill Get wether at fend
papel?
Bet a6,0PaF.
Cornell University
Library
The original of this book is in
the Cornell University Library.
There are no known copyright restrictions in
the United States on the use of the text.
http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924022548337
NOILVYVNIWNHSLX2 40 YUSONVAG NI (so6t) MON
Yona GOOM 5
soiang zisseBy sinoy Aq ‘eogt 4usta{dop
USEFUL BIRDS
AND THEIR PROTECTION.
CONTAINING
BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS OF THE MORE COMMON AND USEFUL SPECIES OF
MASSACHUSETTS, WITH ACCOUNTS OF THEIR FOOD HABITS,
AND A CHAPTER ON THE MEANS OF ATTRACT-
ING AND PROTECTING BIRDS.
BY
EDWARD HOWE FORBUSH,
ORNITHOLOGIST TO THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BOARD OF
AGRICULTURE.
*
ILLUSTRATED BY THE AUTHOR,
C. ALLAN LYFORD, CHESTER A. REED, AND OTHERS.
Second Edition.
PUBLISHED UNDER DIRECTION OF
THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE BOARD OF AGRICULTURE,
BY AUTHORITY OF THE LEGISLATURE.
1907.
orp
CVE RTES
=
G95
7
Ab7
BLII7OT
APPROVED BY
THE STATE BOARD OF PUBLICATION,
PRINTED BY
WRIGHT & POTTER PRINTING COMPANY, STATE PRINTERS,
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
Resolves of 1905, Chapter 51.
A RESOLVE TO PROVIDE FOR PREPARING AND PRINTING A SPECIAL
REPORT ON THE BIRDS OF TILE COMMONWEALTH.
Resolved, That there be allowed and paid out of the treasury of the
Commonwealth a sum not exceeding three thousand dollars for prepar-
ing and printing, under the direction of. the state board of agriculture, in
an edition of five thousand copies, a special report on the birds of the
Commonwealth, economically considered, to include the facts relating
to the usefulness of birds and the necessity for their protection already
ascertained by the ornithologist of the state board of agriculture, to be
distributed as follows : — Two copies to each free public library in the
Commonwealth ; two copies to each high school, and two copies to such
schools in towns which have no high school as the school comniittee
may designate; one copy to the library of congress, and one copy to
each state or territorial library in the United States ; twenty-five copies
to the state library ; five copies to the governor; two copies to the lieu-
tenant governor and each member of the council; two copies to the
secretary of the Commonwealth; two copies to the treasurer and re-
ceiver general; two copies to the auditor of accounts ; two copies to the
attorney-general, and one copy to each member of the present general
court applying for the same; the remainder to be distributed under the
direction of the state board of agriculture. [Approved April 14, 1905.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
Resolves of 1907, Chapter 77.
RESOLVE TO PROVIDE FOR PRINTING} ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THE
REPORT ON THE BIRDS OF THE COMMONWEALTH.
Resolved, That there be allowed and paid out of the treasury of the
Commonwealth, a sum not exceeding twenty-five hundred dellars for
printing five thousand additional copies of the report on the birds of
the Commonwealth. From the copies so printed each member and
each elective officer of the general court for the year nineteen hundred
and seven shall receive ten copies, and each assistant clerk of the
general court, the doorkcepers, messengers and pages shall receive
one copy. Copies may be sold by the secretary of the state board of
agriculture at a price not less than the cost thereof, and additional
copies may be printed for sale at the discretion of the secretary, the
expense thereof to be paid from the receipts from such sales. Any
amount received from sales shall be paid into the treasury of the
Commonwealth. [Approved May 8, 1907.
PREFACE.
In preparing and submitting this report the fact has been
kept in mind that the material prosperity of the state and
nation depends very largely on agricultural pursuits. An
attempt has been made, therefore, to make the volume ser-
viceable to both agriculturist and horticulturist. The author
of this report believes, with Townend Glover, that an ac-
quaintance with the useful birds of the farm is as important
to the farmer as is a knowledge of the insect pests which
attack his crops. Those who open this volume expecting
to find within its covers a guide to the birds, a manual
for the collector, or a systematic account of the birds of
Massachusetts, will be disappointed, for its scope is chiefly
economic.
The plan of the report as outlined before the legislative
committees has been followed to the letter.
In undertaking the work, the author has attempted to
counteract in some measure the effects of some phases of
modern civilization and intensive farming which operate to
destroy or drive out the birds; and it is hoped that the book
will be of some service as a source of useful information for
the bird protectionist. As no report prepared with such a
purpose can exert much influence unless widely read, it has
been written in a popular style, with little scientific verbiage.
A part of the material was prepared between the years
1891 and 1900, during the author’s experience as field di-
rector for the State Board of Agriculture in the work of
destroying the gipsy moth. Chapters I. and II. are partly
composed of revised and rewritten portions of papers pub-
lished during that time. Chapter III. is based largely on
observations made during that period by two faithful, capable
workers, — Messrs. C. E. Bailey and F. H. Mosher. Owing
vi PREFACE.
to Mr. Bailey’s untimely death and Mr. Mosher’s occupation
in a new field, it was deemed best to publish some of the
field notes of these observers with little editing, in order to
avoid any possible distortion of their evidence.
In presenting in Chapter I. some of the evidence, given by
the earlier writers, regarding the utility of birds as protectors
of crops and trees, it has been necessary to use such material
as was obtainable. No carefully guarded experiments or
observations in this direction were made until the latter part
of the nineteenth century, and it is only recently that scien-
tific investigators have been employed in this little-known
field. It is not an alluring task for the scientist, in which
his work brings him neither material reward, credit, nor
honor.
That portion of the final chapter which treats of the means
of attracting birds is drawn mainly from six years’ experience
at the author’s home at Wareham, Mass. The first three
chapters were mainly written there. Most authors quoted
or cited in these chapters are given full credit.
The remaining chapters, which are largely based on the
author’s own investigations and observations, were written
and the proof was read while he was away from home, in the
woods, or travelling from place to place, often at a distance
from any ornithological library. Under such circumstances
it was impossible to quote verbatim, but in most cases authors
are named when facts have been gathered from their writings.
The averages of the components of the food of each species
are taken mainly from the publications of the Bureau of Bio-
logical Survey of the United States Department of Agricul-
ture, except where credit is otherwise given.
Thanks are due to Dr. L. O. Howard, who has read
critically that part of the introduction devoted to insects,
and the author is greatly indebted to him for information ;
also, more than he can tell, to Mr. William Brewster for
counsel and suggestions ; and especially to Mr. J. A. Farley,
" who read a large part of the manuscript.
The limited time at the author’s disposal has prevented
such painstaking revision and abridgment of the manuscript
PREFACE. vii
as would be required to attain the highest literary excellence ;
but both manuscript and proof were critically read by Mrs.
A. Drew, whose work has added much to the appearance of
the volume, and whose suggestions have been very valuable.
Mr. F. H. Fowler has placed the author under great obli-
gations by doing a large amount of clerical work, and giv-
ing much assistance in his official position as first clerk and
librarian of the State Board of Agriculture.
The scientific ornithological nomenclature is that of the
American Ornithologists Union. The grouping of birds
according to their habitats (as birds of woodland, etc.) is
based more on their food habits than on their choice of
nesting sites. This classification is of necessity arbitrary,
and not always consistent, for it is sometimes influenced by
other considerations, such as are evident in the inclusion of
the Whip-poor-will among birds of the air.
The nomenclature of plants is mainly that used by Britton
and Brown in their Flora of the Northern United States,
Canada, and the British Possessions, except in some cases
where Dr. Judd or other authors are quoted. That of insects
has been derived from various sources at different times,
and for this reason some of the scientific names are not the
latest.
In the original plan of the report no descriptions of species
were included; but the suggestion was made by Mr. J. A.
Farley that it would be useless to descant to a man on the
usefulness of the Chickadee if he did not know the bird.
The brief, untechnical descriptions of bird, nest, eggs, and
bird notes, and the illustrations of the species, are all in-
tended as helps to identification. The descriptions of birds
are calculated merely to call attention to the principal colors
and marks that serve to identify birds afield. Brief descrip-
tions of haunts, habits, and manners are also given, as guides
to identity.
A species that is found throughout the year within the
limits of the State is denominated a resident. No attempts
have been made to give fixed dates of arrival and departure,
for these vary somewhat in different parts of the State, as
viii PREFACE.
well as in different seasons; but the months in which each
species is most commonly seen are given. For example,
the season for the Tree Swallow is given as April to Septem-
ber; but no mention is made of the fact that it sometimes
appears in small numbers in March; neither is it stated that
this bird has been seen in flocks in southeastern Massachu-
setts in late October and even in November, for such occur-
rences are unusual. It may be taken for granted that most
of the insect-eating birds that arrive in March or April come
in the latter part of those months, while most of those that
depart for the south in September or October leave in the
earlier weeks of their respective months.
Our attempts to represent the songs of birds in printed
syllables are not often of much assistance to the beginner,
for they lack the variation, quality, and expression of bird
songs, and birds do not sing in syllables. Also, the imagi-
nation of the writer often greatly affects these syllabic rendi-
tions, as may be seen by comparing the various sentences
attributed by different people to the White-throated Sparrow.
Nevertheless, some such imitations of bird songs which are
now accepted and are quite generally considered helpful are
given in this report; in other cases the author’s own inter-
pretations of well-marked bird notes are given.
The line cuts of birds, nesting boxes, appliances, etc., are
mainly reproductions of the author’s pen and ink sketches
and drawings. The attitudes have been caught by sketch-
ing the living birds afield ; but as most of the drawings were
necessarily made in winter, the measurements and the details
of markings were taken mainly from bird skins. While this
method does not give so good results as does the use of the
dead bird, it obviates the necessity of killing birds for the pur-
pose. The sketches for Figs. 19, 22, 23, and 25 were sug-
gested by half-tone plates in American Ornithology. Figs.
1, 27, 53, 71, 73, 79, 109, 113-117, 142, and 143 were made
from pen drawings by Lewis E. Forbush. The wood-cuts
of insects were taken chiefly from Harris’s Insects Injurious
to Vegetation, Flint’s Manual of Agriculture, and various
papers published by Dr. A. S. Packard while serving as ento-
nologist to the Massachusetts State Board of Agriculture.
PREFACE. ix
Mr. C. Allan Lyford has given valuable assistance in taking
photographs illustrating bird feeding, nesting boxes, etc.
The author is also greatly indebted to Messrs. C. A. and
C. K. Reed for the use of half-tone plates from American
Ornithology ; to Mr. Frank M. Chapman, the Massachusetts
Commission on Fisheries and Game, Mr. A. C. Dike, and
others, to whom credit is given in the text or captions, for
the use of photographs, half-tone plates, or cuts; and to
Messrs. William Brewster and Ralph Holman for the use of
bird skins. Plates VI. and VII. are from E. A. Samuels.
The credit for the publication of this volume rightly be-
longs to the State Board of Agriculture, which, through its
secretary, introduced and advocated the resolve providing
for preparing and printing; to the Massachusetts Audubon
Society, which supported the resolve before the Legislature ;
to the various associations, officials, and friends who upheld
the resolve; and to those members of the House and Senate
who were instrumental in securing the appropriation which
made possible the production of the report. For its many
shortcomings the author alone is responsible.
CONTENTS.
PAGE
IntRopuctory.— THE UTILITY oF Birps In NATURE, . i ‘ F 1
Carter I.—TuHE VaLvur or Birds To MAN, . , ; $ A » 23
Primitive Man's Relations to Nature, ‘ 23
Changed Relations produced by Agriculture, . 5 2 7 . 2
Man at War with Nature in the New World, . ‘ 4 a a 25
The Increase of Insect Pests, . ‘ ‘ ‘ P ‘ ‘ ¥ « OF
The Number of Insects, . ‘ x ¥ * i ‘ 4 ~ 28
The Reproductive Capacity of seuss: ‘ . . ‘ ‘ 2 . 28
The Voracity of Insects, . x % F é , ‘ ~ . . 380
The Great Loss to American Agriculture by Insect Ravages, . 5 . 31
Losses by Insect Ravages in Massachusetts, 36
The Capacity of Birds for destroying Pests, 40
The Digestion of Birds, é : i . : : . 40
The Growth of Young Birds, . . : : : - 42
The Amount of Food required by Young Birds, z x ‘ . 4
The Time required for Assimilation of Food, . . . . 49
The Number of Insects eaten by Young Birds in the Nest, é . 81
The Amount of Food eaten by Adult Birds, . ‘ 4 , « ff
Birds save Trees and Crops from Destruction, , . ‘ ‘ » 68
The Increase of Injurious Insects following the Destruction of Birds, . 72
The Destruction of Injurious Mammals by Birds, . ‘ * a . 76
The Value of Water-birds and Shore Birds, . ‘ ‘ ‘ “i . 80
The Commercial Value of Birds, . ‘ ; 7 . 81
The Atsthetic, Sentimental, and Educational 1 Value of Birds, a . 8
Cuapter II.— Tue UTiLity or Birps In WOODLANDS, . 5 : - 90
The Relations of the Bird to the Tree, . . fi i 7 F . 91
The Forest Planters, : A ri : i ‘ a s ‘82
The Influence exerted by] Birds and Squirrels on the Succession of
Forest Trees, . . ‘ 7 . 7 "i 4 Hi . 96
The Tree Pruners, . F i i ‘ . ‘ ‘ ‘ { . 99
The Guardians of the Trees, . : ‘ - ‘ a 4 ; . 100
CuapTeR III.—Birps as DEesTRoYERS oF Hairy CATERPILLARS AND
Puiant LIcE, é é é i i z 5 y Uh
CHAPTER IV.— THE Economic Sone oF Birps IN THE ORCHARD, . 149
CHAPTER V.— Sone Birps oF ORCHARD AND WOODLAND, ‘ ‘ 155
Woodland Thrushes, r $ 3 ; ? ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ « 155
Kinglets, . é - : : ; 2 : t z . 160
Nuthatches and Tits, Fi ; ‘ i . 5 ° é ‘ . 163
xii CONTENTS.
CHAPTER V.—SonG Birps or ORCHARD AND WOODLAND — Con.
Creepers, 7
Thrashers and Mockingbirde, ‘ ‘ 5
Warblers, . 4 ‘ 3 2 * * :
Vireos, . é . i ‘
Waxwings,
Tanagers, . " 5 . y
Finches, Grogbeaks, and Towhees, .
Blackbirds, Grackles, Orioles, etc., .
CHAPTER VI.—SonGLEss BIRDS OF ORCHARD AND WOODLAND,
Flycatchers, ;
Hummingbirds, F ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ : , é
Woodpeckers, . . . . " - . .
Cuckoos, Kingfishers, etc.,
Grouse, Partridges, etc., .
CuarTeR VII.—THE Utivtity oF Birps IN FIELD AND GARDEN, .
CHAPTER VIII.— Birps or FIELD AND GARDEN,
Thrushes and their Allies,
Wrens, . F Z ‘ 2 7
Sparrows, . “
Blackbirds, Aeties etc., ‘ a
Pigeons and Doves, . x . ‘ , . .
Grouse, Partridges, etc., . z és e j ‘ <
Pheasants, : c i : r . .
Snipe, Sandpipers, Woodcock, etc., F F
CHAPTER IX.—Brirps or THE AIR,
Swifts, . x * x , ‘ r P
Nighthawks, Nii saae nk etc.,
Swallows, . 7 ‘ F : ‘ i ‘ : 5
CHAPTER X.— BIRDS OF MARSH AND WATERSIDE,
Perching Birds,
Rails,
Herons,
1 Water-fowl, . ; ‘1 P
CHAPTER XI.— CHECKS UPON THE INCREASE OF aan Birps,
The Destruction of Birds by Man, . : ‘ i ‘ P
The Natural Enemies of Birds,
Introduced Four-footed Enemies,
Cats, . ‘ r & i 2 . . . <
Native Four-footed Enemies, .
Squirrels, . * 2 * . ‘
Rats and Mice, . c é
Feathered Enemies,
Hawks,
Owls, . ‘ ; 4 4 é 3
Crows and Jays, . i a * ‘ é ‘
. 349
. 3850
. 351
» 3853
. 354
. 856
. 361
- 862
. 362
. 364
. 864
« 366
. 366
. 366
. 867
. 3868
CONTENTS.
xill
CuarTeR XI.— CHECKS UPON THE INCREASE OF UsreFuL Birps — Con. PAGE
Feathered Enemies— Con.
The House Sparrow, . . 370
Shrikes, : ‘ . 370
Other Bird Enemies, . : . ‘ . . 371
Reptilian Enemies, . P ‘ 2 : x “ « < atl
Fish, ‘ ‘ ‘ E : ‘ : . d . 371
CHAPTER XII.— THE PROTECTION oF BIRDs, . 372
Methods of attracting Birds, . 373
Feeding and Assembling the Winter ‘Birds, . 377
Attracting the Summer Birds, . . . 384
Providing Nesting Places about Buildings, . . 886
Bird Houses and Nesting Boxes, . . . ° . . 388
Furnishing Nesting Material, . « 893
Feeding the Summer Birds, . 899
Attracting Water-fowl, . ; : ‘ 7 . 402
The Protection of Birds against their Natural niente, 4 - 403
The Protection of Farm Products from Birds, . . 410
To protect Grain from Crows and Other Birds, . » 411
To protect Small Fruits, . . 412
To protect Chickens from Hawks and ‘tiek . 412
General Protective Measures, . . 413
Game Protection, i ‘ F . 414
Measures and Legislation necessary for the Protection of Game and
Birds, é . 4 . » 415
Artificial Paecaeiea of Game Birds, . 417
The Movement for Bird Protection, . * 418
Papers on Ornithology, published by the sehauauba sees) es Board of
Agriculture, ‘ : . . . . 421
INDEX, . ¥ . . 423
FigurRE
FIcurE
FIGURE
FIGURE
FIGURE
FicuRE
FIcurE
Figure
FIGURE
Figure
FIGURE
Figure
FIGURE
FIGuRE
FIGURE
FIiguRE
FIGURE
Figure
FIGURE
FIcuRE
FIGurRE
FIGURE
FigurRE
FIGURE
FIcurE
FicurE
FIGURE
FIGuRE
FIGURE
FicurE
FIGURE
FIGURE
FicguRE
FIGURE
FIgurRE
FIGURE
FIGURE
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
1.—The Archeopteryx, . . f . Fi ‘
2.— Ground Beetle, .
3.—Cutworm, .
4.— Noctuid Moth,
5.—F ly and its Larva, 4 . . .
6.— Chestnut Beetle or Weevil, . . . ‘
7.— Caterpillars, the Larve of Butterflies, . ‘
8. — Pup or Chrysalids, . 3 ‘i
9.— Predaceous Beetle, the Lion Beetle or Once Hiilen:
10. — Predaceous Beetle, a Tiger among Insects, .
11. —Hymenopterous Parasite,
12. — Host Caterpillar with Cocoons of a Parasite upon its Back,
13.— Tiger Beetle, .
14.— Chinch Bug,
15. — Colorado Potato Beetle,
16. — Hessian Fly,
17. — Alimentary Canal of Bluebird,
18. — Young Cedar Bird on its First Day, "
19. — Young Cedar Birds less than Three Weeks old,
20.— Young Grouse, ‘
21. — Young Woodcock,
22. — Young Robins,
23.— Young Crows, . :
24. Passenger Pigeon feeding - mi sgeieAiilion:
25.— Chipping Sparrow feeding Young, .
26. — Yellow-throat catching Birch Aphids,
27. — Western Cricket, .
28. — Gulls saving Crops by killing cuits F
29. Warblers destroying Plant Lice,
30. — The Winged Seed of White Pine,
31.—A Forest Planter, . ‘ , é
32. —Ruffed Grouse, ‘‘ budding,” q : 7
33.— The Diligent Titmouse, . : j : : f
34. — Winter Tree Guards, ‘ * P . .
35. — Destructive Bark Beetle, ¥ ; F x
36. — Woodpecker hunting Borers, - a ‘ F
87.— Larva of the Cecropia Moth, . . . ‘ é
Xvi LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
2 PAGE
Figure 38.— Woolly Bear Caterpillar, 4 3 3 : % , . 120
Figure 39.— Yellow Bear Caterpillar, . ‘ : . « . 120
Ficure 40.— Caterpillar of the White-marked Tussock Moth, . . . 121
Ficure 41.— Web of the Brown-tail Moth Caterpillar, P ‘ . . 10
Ficurer 42.— Nashville Warbler, . A ; A é ‘ ‘ . 133
FicureE 43.— Caterpillar of the Brown-tail Moth, 7 : + 133
FicurE 44.— Warblers feeding on Young Caterpillars of the Giney Moth, » 185
Ficure 45.— Egg Cluster of the Gipsy Moth, ‘ . . . 7 . 148
Ficure 46.— Wilson’s Thrush, . ‘ é 5 4 ‘ é 4 « 157
Ficure 47.— Wood Thrush, . P = x a * ‘ ‘ . 158
FicureE 48.— Golden-crowned Kinglet, ‘ ‘ . . . . » 161
Ficure 49.—Chickadee, . . . i 7 f ‘ . 164
Ficure 50.— Eggs of the Tent Guungiin Moth, - : r ¥ . 167
Ficure 51.—Codling Moth, Parent ofthe Apple Worm, . ‘ “ . 168
Ficure 52.— Fall Cankerworm Moth, : 7 ‘ F i . 169
Ficure 53.— Apple Twig with Eggs of the a een Moth, . "i . 169
Ficure 54.— White-breasted Nuthatch, a a ‘ i. Fi ‘ . 172
Ficure 55.—Nuthatches, . c , g , . : 7 : . 173
Ficure 56.— Wood-boring Beetle, : a . . . . i - 175
Figure 57.— Red-breasted Nuthatch, . ‘ ‘ 4 . : . . 176
Ficurs 58.— Brown Creeper, 7 . : . : . . . . 177
Figure 59.— Brown Thrasher, |. 7 7 ‘ ; . . . 180
Figure 60.—Catbird, . ‘ é ‘ : 5 ‘: i é « 182
Figure 61.— Northern Yellow-throat, . ‘ sce ‘ ‘ f . 187
Ficurer 62.— Oven-bird and Nest, a é ‘ : Fi 3 c . 189
Ficure 63.— Black and White Warbler, . ‘ a é ‘ ‘ . 191
Ficure 64.— Chestnut-sided Warbler, . 4 . ‘ f i é - 193
Figure 65.— Yellow Warbler, . F é ‘ ‘ i P . « 196
Figure 66.— American Redstart, . ‘ ‘ * . ‘ « 197
Figure 67.— Black-throated Green Warbler, é x é é » 199
Figure 68.— Pine Warbler, . : Fi i ‘ ‘ ‘ Fi c - 201
Ficure 69.— Myrtle Warbler, . > . ‘ : ‘ : P . 202
Ficure 70.— Woolly Apple Tree Aphis, . . é é ‘ r . 202
Ficurg 71.—Red-eyed Vireo, . 2... we 204
Ficure 72.— Warbling Vireo, P ‘ ‘ « ¥ : » 206
Ficure 73.— Yellow-throated Vireo, . é . ‘ ‘ : . 208
Figure 74.—Cedar Bird, . ‘ r Z é é ‘ r . . 209
Ficurr 75.— Passing the Cherry, . . ha 0 . . 5 a + 210
Ficure 76.— Good Work in the Orchard, . i é . » 211
Figure 77.— Scarlet Tanagers and Gipsy Moth Gaisiniiaen ‘ . 212
Ficure 78.— Rose-breasted Grosbeak, Male, : ‘a ‘ : ‘i . 216
Ficure 79.— Rose-breasted Grosbeak, Female, . a ‘ . F . 217
FicureE 80.— Towhee, . ‘ : A , c ¥ é fs 27, 219
Figure 81.— Purple Finch, . " 3 : . . 7 . : + 221
Ficure 82.— American Goldfinch, r ‘ . a 4 ri ‘ « 222
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. xvii
PAGE
FicureE 83.— Baltimore Oriole, . * ‘é P 5 ‘ ‘ é » 225
Figure 84.— Pea Weevil, . P : 7 : : ‘ . 226
Ficure 85. — Tent Caterpillars, Fags, a and Caen . - : F - 226
Figure 86.—Click Beetle, . é i a 4 ‘ ‘ é . 227
Ficure 87.— Cucumber Beetle and Curculios, . : ‘ r é - 227
Figure 88.— Gipsy Moth, Male, . . . . e ‘ i 7 . 230
Ficurer 89.— Cankerworm, . " ‘ ‘ i " i ‘ ‘ » 231
Figure 90.— Wood Pewee, . s 2 3 “ ‘ s ‘ . . 232
Figure 91.—Tortricid Moth, «6. eee 882
Ficure 92.— Tussock Moth, F é ‘ , ‘ é ‘ ‘ - 232
Figure 93.— Phoebe, . C é a 3 q . , . 233
Figure 94.— Moth of Spring Cankerworm, . ‘ f . . ‘ . 234
Figure 95.— Wood-boring Click Beetle, . 6 5 6 : - 2384
Fiaure 96.—Brown-tail Moth, . é ‘ : ‘i - : . 234
Ficure 97.— Kingbird, . . . . . . . . 7 . 236
Ficure 98.— Cetonia Beetle, : a é a ; : ; F » 238
Ficurs 99.— May Beetle, . ‘ m * ‘ ‘ . 238
Ficure 100.— Hummingbirds about Two Weeks old, ‘ ‘ . . 242
FicureE 101.— Hummingbird feeding Young, . F : » 243
Ficure 102.— Young Hummingbirds nearly fledged, . 5 : i . 244
FieurE 103.— Skull and Tongue of Woodpecker, . . . . 246
Ficure 104.—Spearlike Tongue-tip of Downy Woodpecker, ‘ e . 246
Figure 105.— Pine Borer, . ‘ a ‘ . : . * . 247
Figure 106.— Pales Weevil, ‘ $ . E . 248
Figure 107.— Cocoon of Codling Moth sional by Woodpecker, , é . 251
Figure 108.— Apple Tree Borer, . ‘ « : . 251
Figure 109.— Section of Young Tree saved i Depiiy eee: rl . 253
Figure 110.— Downy Woodpecker and his Work, - ‘ 7 - . 253
Figure 111.— Bark pierced by Downy Woodpecker, . P . 254
Ficure 112.— The Same, showing the Channels made by Bark Pexeed: . 254
Ficure 113.— Pine Top killed by Pine Weevil, . . . 7 : « 255
Fiacure 114.— Tree ruined for Timber by Pine Weevil, y ‘ . 255
Ficure 115.—Section of Red Maple tapped for Sap, . ‘ é ri . 257
Ficure 116.— A Similar Section, a x 4 ‘ ‘ a * « 267
Ficure 117.— Hairy Woodpecker, . ‘ : . r A ‘ . 258
Ficure 118.—Flicker,. . a ee ee ee 7
Freurer 119, — Black-billed paskan : : ‘ ‘ a é . 264
Figure 120.—Caterpillar of the Io Moth, . _ é ‘ i ‘ . 264
Figure 121.—Spiny Elm Caterpillar, . : ‘ . . ‘ % . 264
Figure 122.— Fall Web Worm, . . o x ‘ ‘ 5 ‘ 265
FicurE 123.— Red-humped Caterpillar, fi . . r : ‘ . 272
Figure 124.— Tree Hoppers, é P zi ‘ # ‘ . ‘ ~ 2738
Ficure 125.— American Robin, . 4 ‘ : ‘ 4 ¥ P . 282
FicurE 126.— White Grub, . ‘ i 4 é ‘ : ; * . 288
Ficure 127.— Bluebird, % : ¥ ‘ F 4 ‘ 4 ‘ . 291
xvill
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
PAGE
FicurE 128.— The Bluebird’s Bread, . 292
Ficurr 129.— Indigo Bunting, Male, « 298
Ficure 130.—Indigo Bunting, Female, . 298
Figure 131.—Song Sparrow, - 299
FicureE 132.—Slate-colored Junco, . 301
Ficure 133.— Field Sparrow, F . 802
Ficure 134.— Chipping Sparrow, 7 7 « 3803
Figure 135.— Moth of the Tent Caterpillar, . 804
Ficure 136.— Chipping Sparrows hunting Beet Worms, - 304
Ficure 137.— Tree Sparrow, ‘ : ‘ é . 306
Figure 138.— White-throated ease . 807
Figure 139.— Vesper Sparrow, . 311
Ficure 140.— Crow Blackbird, . 314
Ficure 141.— Meadowlark, a BIT
Ficure 142.— Red-winged Blackbird, Male, » B19
Ficure 143.— Red-winged Blackbird, Female, . 320
Ficure 144.— Bobolink, Male, and Army Worm, 822
Ficure 145.— Bobolink, Female, . x s » 823
FicureE 146.— Bob-white, . 825
Ficure 147.— The Morning Call, . » 827
Ficure 148. — Ring-necked Pheasant, » 832
Figure 149.— Purple Martin, Male, . 847
Ficure 150.—Purple Martin, Female, . 348
Ficure 151.—Salt-marsh Caterpillar, . 349
Figure 152.— Army Worm, . 349
Ficurr 153.— Swamp Sparrow, . 350
Ficure 154. —Italian Sportsman and his eee Owl, . 359
Ficure 155.— Blue Jay, ‘ “ ‘ i ‘ . 869
Ficurer 156.— Northern Shrike, : . 370
Ficure 157.— Seed Catkins of Gray Birch, . 2 374
Ficure 158.— Fruit of Virginia Juniper or Red Cedar, . 377
Ficure 159.— Downy Woodpecker feeding on Suet, . 380
Ficure 160.— The Birds’ Christmas Tree, » 881
Figure 161.— The Birds’ Tepee, . 382
Fieure 162.— Design for a Sparrow-proof Shelf, « 883
Ficure 163.— Mr. Chapman’s Bird Bath, . 3886
Ficurse 164.— Phosbe’s Nest in Box, . 888
Ficure 165.—Sparrow-proof Box, . 3889
Ficure 166.— Birch-bark Nesting Box for Ohigkaaves, . 891
Ficure 167.— Shingle Box for Bluebirds, F . 892
Figure 168.— Chickadees feeding Young in Observation ee « 895
Figure 169.—A Martin Box, . 396
Figure 170.— A Martin Barrel, : . . ; . 897
Ficure 171.— Zinc Bands to prevent Cats or Squirrels from staan Trees
or Poles, . ‘ : $ . é
. 410
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
Xix
Woop Duck (Colored Plate),
Puate I.— The American Silkworm Moth,
Puate II.—The Destructiveness of the Gipsy Moth,
Puare III.— Expensive Work of destroying the Eggs of the
Gipsy Moth in Woodland Parks,
Puate IV.— Red-eyed Vireo feeding Young,
PLaTE V.— Chickadee, with Insects in its Beak,
PuLatE VI.— Field or Meadow Mouse,
PLATE VII.— White-footed or Deer Mouse,
PLaTE VIII. —A Useful Mouse-eating Owl,
PLaTE IX.—Regurgitated Ow] Pellets,
PLATE X.— The Same Pellets, dissected, . , P
PuiaTE XI.— Albatrosses on Laysan Island, H. I.,
PLatE XII.—The Cecropia Moth, .
PuateE XIII.— Web of Tent Caterpillar,
attacked by Birds, .
PLatTE XIV.— Various Stages of the Brown-tail Moth,
PLaTtE XV.— Various Stages of the Gipsy Moth,
PLATE XVI.— General View of Georgetown Woodland,
PLATE XVII.— Pines, Oaks, and Other Trees, stripped by the
Omnivorous Caterpillars of the Gipsy Moth,
PuatTE XVIII. — Luna Moth,
PLATE XIX.— Least Flycatcher on Nest,
PLATE XX.— Downy Woodpecker at Nest Hole,
PLATE XXI.—Ruffed Grouse on Nest,
PLATE XXII.—Ruffed Grouse, One Day old,
PuatTeE XXIII. — Ruffed Grouse, Four Months old,
PLATE XXIV.—Ruffed Grouse, strutting,
XXV.— Robin’s Nest in Hollow Tree,
XXVI.— Robin on Nest, .
XXVII.— Wren at Nest Hole, ‘
XXVIII.— Chipping Sparrows feeding their vous,
XXIX.— American Woodcock,
XXX.— Nighthawk, . é
XXXI. — Whip-poor-will, ‘i < 7 ‘
PLaTE XXXII.— A Swallow Roost,
PLatE XXXIII.— Nest Robbers, -
PuatE XXXIV.— Work which drives out the Birds,
PLateE XXXV.—Cat with Young Robin, . .
PLatE XXXVI.— Barred Owl, . i
Puate XXXVII.— Blue Jay’s Nest in ee 8 ioe: :
Pirate XXXVIII. — Fruits that are valuable as Bird Food,
Puate XXXIX.—A Bountiful Repast, Z ‘ Fi
Pirate XL.— A Scratching Shed, F é : . ‘
Puatre XLI.—Chickadee seen through Window, at erie s
Home,
which had been
PLatTEe
PLATE
PLATE
PLATE
PLATE
PLATE
PLATE
Frontispiece
faces page 31
between pages 38 and 39
between pages 38 and 39
faces page 51
faces page 54
faces page 76
faces page 76
faces page 78
faces page 80
faces page 80
faces page 82
faces page 109
faces page 118
faces page 137
faces page 142
faces page 144
faces page 144
faces page 214
faces page 229
faces page 249
faces page 267
faces page 268
faces page 268
faces page 270
faces page 283
faces page 289
faces page 293
faces page 304
faces page 336
faces page 341
faces page 341
faces page 343
faces page 359
faces page 360
faces page 362
faces page 367
faces page 369
faces page 375
faces page 378
faces page 378
faces page 380
¢
XX LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.
Puate XLII. — Chickadees on Pork Rind, é é . faces page 380
PLATE XLIII.— Ernest Harold Baynes taming a Ohicteaiads . faces page 381
PLATE XLIV. — Chickadee feeding from the Hand, . ‘ . faces page 381
PLatE XLV.—Chickadees seen on a Frosty Morning, through
Author’s Window, a . faces page 382
Puate XLVI.— A Red-breasted Nuthatch at the ‘e Window, . faces page 382
PuaTE XLVII.— Bird Houses and Nesting Boxes, . 3 . faces page 391
PLATE XLVIII.— Inexpensive Nesting Boxes, ‘ faces page 392
PuiaTE XLIX.—Chickadee about to enter its Nest, in an Old
Varnish Can, . . ‘ i 5 A e . faces page 392
Puate L.— Owl Box, at Sian s Home, . P between pages 394 and 395
Piate LI.— Owl on Nest, . s ‘ : 5 between pages 394 and 395
Piate LII.—Chickadee’s Nest, made of Cotton, in Box on
Author’s Window, é ‘ ‘ ‘ between pages 400 and 401
PuatTE LIII.— Chickadee on Nest, . é . between pages 400 and 401
Puate LIV. — Mother Chickadee bringing Food to Young,
between pages 400 and 401
PiLatE LV.— Mother Chickadee cleaning Nest, between pages 400 and 401
Piatse LVI.— Domesticated Canada Goose on Nest, r . faces page 417
USEFUL BIRDS AND THEIR PROTECTION.
INTRODUCTORY.
THE UTILITY OF BIRDS IN NATURE,
There is no subject in the field of natural science that is
of greater interest than the important position that the living
bird occupies in the great plan of organic nature.
The food relations of birds are so complicated and have
such a far-reaching effect upon other forms of life that the
mind of man may never be able fully to trace and grasp them.
The migrations of birds are so vast and widespread that the
movements of many species are still more or less shrouded
in mystery. We do not yet know, for instance, just where
certain common birds pass some of the winter months. Some
species sweep in their annual flights from Arctic America
to the plains of Patagonia, coursing the entire length of the
habitable portion of a hemisphere. Many of the birds that
summer in northern or temperate America winter in or near
the tropics. Some species remain in the colder or temperate
regions only long enough to mate, nest, and rear their young,
and then start on their long journey toward the equator.
The annual earth-wide sweep of the tide of bird life from
zone to zone renders the study of the relations of birds to
other living forms throughout their range a task of the
utmost magnitude. This vast migration at once suggests
the question, Of what use in nature is this host of winged
creatures that with the changing seasons sweeps over land
and sea?
Our first concern in answering this question is to deter-
mine what particular office or function in the economy of
nature birds alone are fitted to perform. The relations
2 USEFUL BIRDS.
they may bear to the unnatural and semi-artificial conditions
produced by the agriculturist may then be better under-
stood. The position occupied by birds among the forces of
nature is unique in one respect at least; their structure fits
them to perform the office of a swiftly moving force of
police, large bodies of which can be assembled at once to
correct disturbances caused by abnormal outbreaks of plant
or animal life. This function is well performed. A swarm
of locusts appears, and birds of many species congregate to
feed upon locusts. An irruption of field mice, lemmings, or
gophers occurs, and birds of prey gather to the feast from
far and near.
This habit of birds is also serviceable in clearing the earth
of decaying materials, which otherwise might pollute both
air and water. A great slaughter of animals takes place,
and Eagles, Vultures, Crows, and other scavengers hasten to
tear the flesh from the carcasses. A dead sea monster is
cast upon the shore, and sea birds promptly assemble to
devour its wasting tissues. The gathering of birds to feed
is commonly observed in the flocking of Crows in meadows
where grasshoppers or grubs abound, the assembling of
Crows and Blackbirds in cornfields, and in the massing of
shore birds on flats or marshes where the receding tide
exposes their food. :
A study of the structure and habits of birds shows how
well fitted they are to check excessive multiplication of
injurious creatures or to remove offensive material. Birds
are distinguished from all other animals by their complex,
feathered wings, —the organs of perfect flight.
The tremendous muscular power exhibited by birds is only
such as might be expected in creatures provided with such
perfect respiratory, circulatory, and assimilative organs. The
strength of birds as compared with that of man is enormously
out of proportion to their size ; but it is largely concentrated
in the muscles that move the wings, for it is by flight that
the bird is enabled to live. No other animals have such
sustained power of flight or such perfect command over
themselves while in the air. Even the bat, which is a most
skillful flyer, being remarkably quick in aerial evolutions,
UTILITY OF BIRDS IN NATURE. 3
cannot at its best equal the bird. I once saw a bat make
seven attempts to catch a moth fluttering along the still sur-
face of a moonlit river. A Swallow could have seized it at
once with no perceptible effort. No creature can equal the
soaring of the Eagle or Vulture, or that of the Man-o’-War
Bird as it sails on high above the storm; while the speed
that the Hummingbird attains is such that the eye can
scarcely follow its most rapid flight.
Birds are provided with wings to enable them (1) to pro-
cure food, (2) to escape their enemies, (3) to migrate.
All birds have wings, though a few, like the Apteryx, have
them only in arudimentary form. Others, like the Penguin
and the Ostrich, have small wings, but cannot raise them- |
selves in the air.
All birds that cannot tly, however, are reminders of a past
age, and are not fitted to live on the same earth with man.
Such birds are either already extinct or in a fair way to
become so, either at the hands of man-or at the teeth or
claws of the dogs, cats, or other animals that man introduces.
Flight alone might save the few that remain. The Great
Auk, using its wings only in pursuing its prey under water,
disappeared before the onslaught of the white man; while
the Loon, flying both under water and above it, still sur-
vives.
Birds are pursued by many enemies. Water-fowl fly to
the water and dive to escape the Hawk or Eagle, and fly to
the land to escape the shark, alligator, or pike. Sparrows
fly to the thicket to elude the Hawk, and to the trees to
avoid the cat. Evidently this great power of flight was given
to birds to enable them not only to concentrate their forces
rapidly at a given point, but also to pursue other flying
creatures. Birds can pursue bats, flying squirrels, flying
fish, and insects through the air. Bats and insects are their
only competitors in flight. Comparatively few insects can
escape birds by flight, and this they do mainly by quick
dodging and turning. The speed at which birds can fly on
occasion has seldom been accurately measured. The maxi-
mum flight velocity of certain wild-fowl is said to be ninety
miles an hour. Passenger Pigeons killed in the neighbor-
4 ‘USEFUL BIRDS.
hood of New York have had in their crops rice probably
taken from the fields of the Carolinas or Georgia, which
indicates that within six hours they had flown the three or
four hundred miles intervening, at about the rate of a mile
a minute.? :
The rate of flight of a species must be sufficiently rapid
to enable it to exist, and so perform its part in the economy
of nature.
Birds find distant food by the senses of sight and hearing
mainly. The sense of smell is not highly developed, but
the other perceptive powers are remarkable. The perfection
of sight in birds is almost incomprehensible to those who
have not studied the organs of vision. The keen eye of the
Hawk has become proverbial. The bird’s eye is much larger
in proportion to the size of its owner than are the eyes of
other vertebrates. It is provided with an organ called the
pecten, by which, so naturalists believe, the focus can be
changed in an instant, so that the bird becomes nearsighted
or farsighted at need. Such provision for changing the focus
of the eye is indispensable to certain birds in their quick rush
upon their prey. Thus the Osprey or Fish Hawk, flying
over an arm of the sea, marks its quarry down in the dark
water. As the bird plunges swiftly through the air its eye
is kept constantly focussed upon the fish, and when within
striking distance it can still see clearly its panic-stricken
prey. Were a man to descend so suddenly from such a
height he would lose sight of the fish before he reached the
water. The Flycatcher, sitting erect upon its perch, watch-
ing passing insects that are often invisible to the human eye,
in like manner utilizes the pecten in the perception, pursuit,
and capture of its prey. Most of the smaller birds will see
a Hawk in the sky before it becomes visible to the human
eye. The Vulture, floating on wide wings in upper air,
discerns his chosen food in the valley far below, and as he
descends toward it he is seen by others wheeling in the dis-
tant sky. As they turn to follow him they also are seen by
others soaring at greater distances, who, following, are pur-
* American Ornithology, Wilson and Bonaparte, Vol. IV, pp. 319, 320. Evi-
dently a quotation from Audubon's Ornithological Biography.
UTILITY OF BIRDS IN NATURE. 5
sued from afar by others still, until a feathered host con-
centers from the sky upon the carrion feast.
Birds are lower in the organic scale than the class of
mammals which includes man, the four-footed animals, and
even the seal and the whale. Birds are closely allied in
structure to reptiles. The earliest bird known, the Archee-
opteryx, had teeth,
two fingers on each
wing, anda long rep-
tilian tail adorned
with feathers. Still,
notwithstanding the
comparatively low
place which is given
by the systematists
to birds, their
physical organiza-
tion excels in some
respects that of all
otheranimals. They
surpass all other
vertebrate animals
in breathing power
or lung capacity, as
well as in muscular
strength and activ-
ity . The tempera- Fig. 1.—The Archeopteryx, a bird with teeth. Re-
ture of the blood is stored from the Jurassic epoch. About one-fifth natural
size; after Chapman.
higher in birds than
in other animals, and the circulation is more rapid. To
maintain this high temperature, rapid circulation, and great
activity, a large amount of food is absolutely necessary.
Food is the fuel without which the brightly burning fires
of life must grow dim and die away. Birds are, therefore,
fitted for their function of aerial police not only by their
powers of flight and perception, but also by their enormous
capacity for assimilating food. When food is plentiful,
birds gorge themselves, accumulating fat in quantities.
Shore birds frequently become so fat during the fall migra-
6 USEFUL BIRDS.
tions that, when shot, their distended skins burst open
when their bodies strike the ground. This accumulation of
fatty tissue may aid to tide the birds over a season of
scarcity, but the moment they need food they must seek
-it far and wide, if need be, as they cannot live long with-
outit. Birds are not always the ethereal, care-free creatures
of the poet’s dream. In time of plenty, the joys of flight,
of sunshine, of singing, of riding swinging boughs, or toss-
ing to and fro on flashing waves, are theirs to the full;
but in times of scarcity, or when rearing their helpless
young, their daily lives are often one continued strenuous
hunt for food. Food, therefore, is the mainspring of the
bird’s existence. Love and fear alone are at times stronger
than the food craving. The amount of food that birds are
capable of consuming renders them doubly useful in case of
an emergency.
The utility of birds in suppressing outbreaks of other an-
imals by massing at threatened points is of no greater value
in the plan of nature than is the perennial regulative influ-
ence exerted by them individually everywhere as a check on
the undue increase of other forms of life.
He who studies living birds, other animals, or plants, and
the relations which these living organisms bear to one
another, will soon learn that the main effort of each plant
or animal is to preserve its own life and produce seed or
young, and so multiply its kind. He will see, also, that the
similar efforts of other organisms by which it is surrounded
tend to hold its increase in check.
The oak produces many hundreds of acorns; and were
each acorn to develop into a tree, the earth eventually would
be full of oaks, for all other trees would be crowded out.
But many animals feed on the acorns or the young seedlings ;
other trees crowd out the young oaks; caterpillars feed on
the foliage; other insects feed on the wood and bark, de-
stroying many trees; so, on the average, each oak barely
succeeds in producing another to occupy its place.
Certain moths deposit hundreds of eggs in a season; and
were each egg to hatch and each insect to come to maturity
and go on producing young at the same rate, the entire earth
UTILITY OF BIRDS IN NATURE. 7
in a few years would be carpeted with crawling caterpillars,
and the moths in flight would cover the earth like a blanket
of fog. But under natural conditions the caterpillars that
hatch from the eggs of the moth are destroyed by birds,
mammals, insects, or other animals, by disease or the action
of the elements, so that in the end only one pair of moths
succeeds another. If every Robin should produce five young
each yéar, and each Robin should live fifteen years, in time
every square foot of land on this continent would be packed
with Robins; but the surplus Robins are killed and eaten
by various other birds or by mammals, each striving to
maintain itself; so that, eventually, the number of Robins
remains about the same.
Thus we see that, while birds, insects, other animals, and
plants are constantly striving to increase their numbers, the
creatures that feed upon them operate continually to check
this undue multiplication. The Hawk preys upon the smaller
birds and mammals. The smaller birds and mammals feed
on insects, grass, seeds, leaves, and other animal and vege-
table food, each virtually endeavoring to gain strength and
increase the numbers of its race at the expense of other
living organisms.
There is a competition among various dissimilar organisms,
also, in seeking certain kinds of food. Grazing mammals,
such as cattle, sheep, and deer, eat grass. Grass is eaten
also by birds, mice, and insects. If any one kind of these
creatures should be left without check, and become too
numerous, it might consume the food supply of all.
In the great struggle for existence, each perpetuating
form of life that we call a species is really an expansive
force, that can be restrained and kept in its proper place
only by the similar expansive forces (other species) by
which it is surrounded. It is as if the whole field of ani-
mal and vegetable life consisted of a series of springs, cach
exerting a pressure in all directions, and each held in place
only by the similar expansion of the springs surrounding it.
This action and reaction of natural forces constitute what is
known as the balance of nature. Any serious disturbance
of this balance is always fraught with serious consequences.
8 USEFUL BIRDS.
All animals and plants are sustained and nourished by
air, water, and food. Food supplies the material for growth
and development. Its abundance increases the energy and
fertility of a species, —its ability to produce young abun-
dantly. The study of the food and food habits of birds and
other animals is of the utmost importance, for by this study
alone we are enabled to trace their life relations to each.
other, to plants, and to man. Some progress has ‘already
been made in this study. We know in a general way the
character of the food of some of the common birds of the
United States ; but we know so little as yet of the food of
the smaller mammals, the reptiles, batrachians, many insects
and other lower animals, that it is impossible to tell what
may be the ultimate effect of the destruction of any one of
these animals by birds.
On the other hand, no one can tell what grave and far-
reaching results might follow the extermination of a single
species of bird; for it is probable that the food preferences
of each species are so distinctive that no other could fill its
place.
Birds are guided by their natural tastes in selecting their
food, unless driven by necessity. Of the food which suits
their tastes, that which is most easily taken is usually first
selected. In the main, species of similar structure and
habits often choose similar food, but each species usually
differs from its allies in the selection of some certain favorite
insects. Were a species exterminated, however, its place
might be taken eventually by the combined action of many
species, for nature always operates to restore her disturbed
balances.
The complexity of the food relations existing between
birds and other organisms may be indicated hypothetically
by a brief illustration. The Eagles, larger Hawks, and Owls
feed to some extent on Crows, and probably the nocturnal,
tree-climbing, nest-haunting raccoon also robs them of eges
and young; otherwise, they seem to have very few natural
enemies to check their increase. Crows feed on so many
different forms of animal and vegetable life that they are
nearly always able to find suitable food; therefore they
are common and widely distributed.
UTILITY OF BIRDS IN NATURE. 9
The general fitness of the Crow is admitted by all. Un-
doubtedly it has a useful work to perform in the world ; but
a careful study of its food habits shows so many apparently
harmful traits that it may well leave the investigator in some
doubt as to the Crow’s value in the general plan. Crows
rob the nests of Robins, eating very many eggs and young
birds ; they therefore constitute a serious check on the in-
crease of this species. Robins feed largely on common black
beetles, called ground beetles (Carabide), which run about
on the ground, hiding under stones and other rubbish. As
these beetles are not quick to fly by day, \
and are easily caught, they form a consid-
erable part of the food of many ground-
frequenting birds. But ground beetles
feed, to a greater or less extent, on other
insects. The question then arises, Is not
the Robin doing harm in killing ground
beetles, and does it not merit the destruc-
tion of its eggs and young by the Crow? pig 9 Ground
If the Robin’s habit of eating these beetles beetle.
is harmful, is not the Crow rendering a service by destroy-
ing a bird so apparently destructive as the Robin? Perhaps,
if there were too many Robins, they might eat too many
ground beetles, and thus become the indirect cause of the
destruction of much vegetation, by saving the lives of the
caterpillars and other harmful insects that the ground beetles,
had they been left to themselves, might have destroyed.!
Many ground beetles that are eaten by the Robin feed
much on vegetable matter.?- This makes these beetles doubly
useful in one respect, for they can maintain their numbers
1 These questions can be answered only by one having a thorough knowledge
of the food of our ground beetles, —a knowledge which no living man yet pos-
sesses; but enough has been learned to throw some light on their food habits.
Insects that feed promiscuously on other insects are generally classed as bene-
ficial in so far as they take insect food, even though they may destroy some
so-called useful insects; for, as the so-called injurious insects far outnumber the
useful ones, it is considered safe to regard the habit of feeding on insects a bene-
ficial one. :
2 The ground beetles of the genus Calosoma and those of some closely allied
genera are believed to feed entirely on animal food, as their structure fits them
for that alone. They feed ravenously upon both beneficial and injurious insects,
and when too numerous they devour one another. These are not the beetles that
are generally eaten by the Robin, however, but rather by the Crow.
10 USEFUL BIRDS.
when insect food is not plentiful, and so be ready to check
any increase of insects which may occur. On the other
hand, if they become too numerous, they may create serious
disturbances by destroying grass, grain, or fruit. I have
witnessed attacks made by certain of these beetles on grain
and strawberries; and were they not held in check by
birds, it is probable that they would soon become serious
pests. Their destruction by Robins and other birds tends
to keep these beetles within those normal bounds where
they will do most good and least harm; while the check
kept by the Crow on the increase of the Robin may pre-
vent the latter from destroying too many ground beetles.
If certain low-feeding caterpillars became so numerous as to
be injurious, ground beetles and Robins would feed largely
on them. The caterpillars would then largely take the place
of the beetles in the Robin’s food. The beetles, therefore,
would increase in numbers, and the force of both bird and
beetle would be exerted to reduce the caterpillars to their
normal limit. This accomplished, the Robin would again
attack the ground beetles, and thus tend to reduce them
‘to normal numbers.
Let us now go back to the beginning of our chain of
destruction. The Eagles, Hawks, Owls, and raccoons may.
indirectly allow an increase in the number of Robins by
preventing too great an increase of the Crow. But Hawks
and Owls also prey on the Robin, and, by dividing their
attention between Robin and Crow, assist in keeping both
birds to their normal numbers. Whenever Crows became
rare, Robins as a consequence would become very numerous,
were it not that the Hawks also eat Robins. (Hawks and
Owls eat also some species of insects that are eaten by both
Robin and Crow.)
There are compensations in the apparently destructive
career of the Crow. An omnivorous bird, it seems inclined
to turn its attention to any food which is plentiful and readily
obtained. It is a great feeder on May beetles (miscalled
“June bugs”), the larvee of which, known as white grubs,
burrowing in the ground, sometimes devastate grass lands
and also injure the roots of many plants, including trees.
UTILITY OF BIRDS IN NATURE. 11
The Crow is also a destroyer of cutworms. These are
the young or larve of such noctuid moths or “ millers”
as are commonly seen fluttering from the grass by any one
who disturbs them by walking in the
fields. Robins also feed largely on
cutworms, as well as on the white Fig. 3.—Cutworm.
grub of the May beetle. When these insects are few in
number, a part of the usual food supply of both Robin
and Crow is cut off. This being the case, the hungry
Crows are likely to destroy more young
mw, Robins and other young birds than
usual, in order to make up the supply
of animal food for themselves and their
ravenous nestlings. Ina few years this
would decrease perceptibly the number
of Robins and other small birds, and would be likely in
turn to allow an increase of May beetles and cutworms.
As these insects became more plentiful, the Crows would
naturally turn again to them, paying less attention to the
young of Robins and other birds for the time, and allowing
them to increase once more, until their multiplication put
a check on the insects, when the Crows would of necessity
again raid the Robins.
The Blue Jay may be taken as another instance of this
means of preserving the balance of nature. Hawks and
Owls kill Blue Jays, Crows destroy their eggs and young ;
thus the Jays are kept in check. Jays are omnivorous
feeders. They eat the eggs and young of other birds, par-
ticularly those of Warblers, Titmice, and Vireos, — birds
which are active caterpillar hunters. But Jays are also
extremely efficient caterpillar hunters. Thus the Jays
compensate in some measure for their destruction of cat-
erpillar-eating birds, by themselves destroying the cater-
pillars which they unconsciously have allowed to increase
in numbers by destroying these birds. Like the Crow,
they virtually kill the young of the smaller birds, and eat
them, that they (the Jays) may eventually have more in-
sect food for their own young. When this object has been
attained, the Jays may again, perhaps, allow an increase of
Fig. 4.—Noctuid moth.
12 USEFUL BIRDS.
the smaller birds, the survivors of which they have unwit-
tingly furnished with more insect food, thus making con-
ditions favorable for the increase of the smaller birds.
These oscillations or alternate expansions and contractions
in the numbers of birds or insects are usually so slight as
to escape common observation. It is only in those cases
where they are carried to extremes that they result disas-
trously. Under nature the checks on the increase of birds
are essential, else they would increase in numbers until
their food supply had become exhausted, when they would
starve, and other consequences even more grave and much
more complex would then follow.
While these examples of the way in which the balance of
nature is preserved may be regarded as somewhat hypothet-
ical, they probably approximate what actually takes place,
although the feeding habits of birds undoubtedly produce
far more complicated results than are here outlined.
It is a law of nature that the destroyer is also the protector.
Birds of prey save the species on which they prey from
overproduction and consequent starvation. They also serve
such species in at least two other ways: (1) the more
powerful bird enemies of a certain bird usually prey upon
some of its weaker enemies; (2) these powerful birds also
check the propagation of weakness, disease, or unfitness, by
killing off the weaker or most unfit individuals among the
species on which they prey, for these are most easily captured
and killed.
We have seen already that Jays, which are enemies of
the smaller birds, are preyed upon by the more powerful
Crows, Hawks, and Owls. These latter also destroy skunks,
weasels, squirrels, mice, and snakes, all of which are also
enemies of the smaller birds. No doubt these animals would
be much more injurious to the smaller birds were they with-
out these wholesome feathered checks on their increase.
In a state of nature, albino birds or those that are rendered
conspicuous to their enemies by any unusual mark or color
are soon captured by some bird of prey, and seldom live to
perpetuate their unfitness.
UTILITY OF BIRDS IN NATURE. 13
An experience with domestic Pigeons, related to me by
Mr. William Brewster, will serve as proof of this state-
ment. He had kept a flock of twenty-five or thirty Pigeons
in confinement at Cambridge for many years. Under such
protective domestication the individuals of the flock had
assumed a variety of shades and colors. There were blue
Doves, white Doves, and many pied individuals varying
between the two extremes. He removed the flock to. his
farm in Concord, where they were at liberty to roam at will
during the day. Here they were attacked by Hawks, and
in five years’ time the white and pied birds were practically
all weeded out, and the flock consisted of blue rock Doves
alone.
The preservation of birds by the weeding out of sickly
or wounded individuals did not escape the notice of Prof.
Spencer F. Baird, who wrote : —
It has now been conclusively shown, I think, that Hawks perform an
important function in maintaining in good condition the stock of game
birds, by capturing the weak and sickly, and thus preventing reproduc-
tion from unhealthy parents. One of the most plausible hypotheses
explanatory of the occasional outbreaks of disease amongst the grouse
of Scotland has been the extermination of these correctives, the disease
being most virulent where the game keepers were most active in de-
stroying what they considered vermin.!
It appears, then, that under natural conditions the birds of
prey destroy merely the unfit and surplus individuals of the
species on which they prey, and do not, on the whole, reduce
their numbers below what the land will support.
The relations of birds to insects merit the most profound
thought and study. No one can study intelligently the effect
produced by birds upon insect life unless he first acquires
some knowledge of the habits and transformations of insects,
and is able to distinguish the so-called injurious and -benefi-
cial groups. A brief explanation here of the transformations
of insects will better enable the reader to understand the
terns used later in describing them as food for birds.
1 Letter from Prof. Spencer F. Baird to Mr. J. W. Shorton, published in the
Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History, 1882, Vol. V, pp. 69, 70.
14 USEFUL BIRDS.
Most insects emerge from eggs, which ordinarily are de-
posited and fixed by the female parent in positions where
the young will find suitable food in readiness
for them when the eggs hatch. Some insects
bring forth their young alive, but this is an
Fig. 5.—Fly ana exception to the general rule. The young
itslarva. —_ insect that emerges from the egg is called the
larva (plural, larve). Some larvee are provided with short
legs or feet, others have none that can be seen ; but all are
without wings, and move about mainly by crawling. Their
principal occupation is to feed. Some species, such as the
Fig. 6.— Chestnut beetle or weevil, enlarged. wu, larva or grub, enlarged;
b, young larva in chestnut, natural size.
leaf-eating caterpillars, rest during certain parts of the day;
others, like the larve of fiesh-feeding flies, apparently feed
constantly. As all eat enormously and grow rapidly, they
are capable, when in great numbers, of doing much harm or
good, as the case may be. The larve of flies are commonly
called maggots or slugs, those of beetles are called grubs,
and those of butterflies and moths are called caterpillars.
Much of the injury
done by insect pests
is attributable to the
Jarvee 3; a lthou g h Fig. '7.— Caterpillars, the larvee of butterflies.
some, like certain leaf-eating beetles, are injurious in the per-
fect form. During the rapid growth of a larva the skin is
shed several times, until full size is reached, when the next
transformation is effected, and the larva becomes a pupa or
chrysalis. -Among the butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera)
the insect often spins from within itself a thread, which it
weaves into a case or cocoon which encloses it while in the
UTILITY OF BIRDS IN NATURE. 15
pupal form. This stage it passes without food and while
fixed to some object. The pup or nymphs of some other
insects, however, move about freely, as is the case with
locusts, grasshoppers, and like insects (Orthoptera).?
The pupa finally throws
off its outer shell, and
emerges a fully developed
or perfect insect or imago
with wings; although some
insects which, like some
birds, have lost the use
of their wings, never fly.?
After the union of the sexes
the female insect eventually
deposits the eggs for the Fig. 8.—Pupe or chrysalids.
next generation. Thus we have four forms which insects
assume: (1) the egg, (2) the larva, (3) the pupa or nymph,
(4) the imago or perfect winged insect.
Practically all living animals of appreciable size, as well
as most plants that are visible to the unaided eye, furnish
food for certain insects. Other insects feed on dead animals,
dead trees, or other decaying animal or vegetable matter.
A certain larva has been known even to tunnel into marble.
Those insects which feed on live vegetation or living animals
are capable of doing great harm if they increase unduly;
while those that feed only on dead animals or dead and
decaying vegetation can do only good in nature, although
they may be injurious to man by destroying hides, furs, pre-
served meats, or clothing.
It is difficult to perceive the usefulness of those so-called
injurious species which feed on the different parts of plants ;
still, the larvee that eat the buds, the caterpillars that feed
1 In the Orthoptera the transformations are imperfect; the larvz of grass-
hoppers, for example, are provided with well-developed legs, and much resemble
the imago or perfect iisect, but are without wings. In this stage they are usually
called nymphs. As they approach maturity they enter what is virtually an im-
perfect pupal stage, but retain their shape, limbs, and activity. They now show
rudimentary wings, but it is only at maturity that they are capable of flight.
2 The Thysanura, or lowest order of insects, including ‘‘ bristle tails,”’ “‘ spring
tails,” ‘‘ fish moths,’’ and the like, never become winged or develop any trace of
wings.
16 USEFUL BIRDS.
on the leaves, the borers that attack the twigs, and the insects
that destroy the blossom or the fruit, all probably, when in
normal numbers, exert a useful influence by a healthful and
necessary pruning, which at least does no injury to the tree.
It is only when these insects increase abnormally in numbers
that they seriously injure or destroy many vigorous plants
and trees. During such outbreaks birds often come to the
rescue of the trees. Birds feed very largely on such insects,
and by keeping down their excessive multiplication perform
a great service in the economy of nature.
Here the keen senses and remarkable flight powers pos-
sessed by birds aid them in concentrating their forces imme-
diately when and where they are most needed. The rule
will bear repetition here that, other things being equal, birds
will take such suitable food as is most plentiful and most
easily obtained. This is especially true of the feeding of
birds on insects, although there are some insects that are so
protected by prickly spines or acrid secretions that few birds
will eat them. Such are the caterpillars of the mourning-
cloak butterfly (Huvanessa antiopa) and the imagoes of the
Colorado potato beetle (Doryphora decemlineata) .
Birds are quick to assemble wherever in the woods the
disappearing foliage denotes the presence of great numbers
of destructive caterpillars, or where patches of dead and.
dying grasses indicate that grubs are destroying the grass
roots on meadow or prairie. Birds flock to such places to
feed on the easily procured insects, and so take a prominent
part in repressing such insect outbreaks. This is so well
known as to be worthy of only passing mention here, were it
not to inquire whether the birds that assemble in such locali-
ties do not neglect their normal and special work of hold-
ing in check certain species elsewhere. If the Robin, for
example, which feeds normally on such ground-frequenting
insects as white grubs, cutworms, grasshoppers, March flies,
and ground beetles, goes to the woods to féed on caterpillars,
as is sometimes the case, does it neglect to devour any one
of the insects on which it usually feeds, and so give this
insect a chance to increase? If so, it would be merely sup-
pressing one outbreak and permitting another. But birds
UTILITY OF BIRDS IN NATURE. 17
do not neglect any one element of their ordinary food in
such cases. They neglect them all, both animal and vegetal,
for the time being, and turn to the npw abundant insect food
that is more readily accessible. This I have observed in
studying outbreaks of cankerworms, and Professor Forbes
records a similar experience with birds feeding on canker-
worms.!
This apparently agrees with the experience of the forest
authorities in Bavaria during the great and destructive out-
break of the nun moth (Liparis monacha) which occurred
there from 1889 to 1891. The flight of Starlings collected
in one locality alone was credibly estimated at ten thousand,
all busily feeding on the caterpillars, pupz, and moths.
Enormous flights of Titmice and Finches were similarly
engaged. The attraction of Starlings to such centers be-
came so great that market gardeners at a distance felt their
absence seriously.”
Evidently in such cases the birds, changing their usual
fare entirely for the time being, remove their restraining
influence from both useful and injurious insects, leaving one
to exert its full force as a check on the other, until the urgent
business of the serious outbreak of grasshoppers, caterpillars,
or some other pest has been attended to; then the birds
return to their usual haunts and food, and exert the same
repressive influence as before.
Although the insects which are potentially injurious are
greatly in the majority, there are many species which per-
form a very.apparent useful function in nature. Such are
the bees and some of their allies of the order Hymenop-
tera, — insects which travel from flower to flower in search
of sweets, and, becoming loaded with pollen, fertilize the
blossoms, rendering the trees fruitful. Other insects seem
especially adapted to hold the potentially injurious species
in check. Some which are called predaceous insects attack
other insects and devour them, as do the ground beetles
1 The Regulative Action of Birds upon Insect Oscillations, by 8. A. Forbes.
Bulletin No. 6, Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History, 1883, p. 21.
2? Protection of Woodlands, by Herman Fiirst. English edition, translated by
John Nisbet, 1893, p. 126.
18 USEFUL BIRDS.
(Carabide) already mentioned, the tiger beetles (Cicinde-_
lide), the ladybirds (Coccinellide), and many of the true
bugs. Such insects are often miscalled parasites, but they
do not merit this misnomer.
The predaceous beetles are
the wolves, lions, and tigers of
the insect world. They hunt
down their prey, pouncing
upon it and killing it when
found. Often these insects
are so ravenous that they con-
tent themselves with drawing
' the life blood and other juices
from their quarry, leaving the
$ rest to be devoured by ants
Fig. 9.—Predaceous beetle; the lion OF other scavengers. While
pice riieie penis the larger predaceous beetles
attack many of the larger insects, smaller species, such as
ladybirds, assail other minute insects, such as the aphids
or plant lice.
The bugs are the vampires of the insect world. Armed
with a strong proboscis, the bug pursues its
prey, pierces it and sucks its juices, leaving it
drained and lifeless ; but the so-called parasitic
insects feed in a manner entirely different.
Certain families of the Hymenoptera’ and
Diptera contain parasitic genera and species.
These insects range in size from that of a large
wasp down to that of a small midge. Most of Fig. 10.—Pre.
‘ oye * daceous beetle;
them have the habit of depositing their eggs a tiger among
on, or in, the bodies of other living insects. IBA:
Each ichneumon fly is armed with a long
—k ovipositor, which operates somewhat like a
hollow sting, by means of which it is en-
abled to pierce the skin of the larve of
other insects and pass its eggs through the
gh sca ream die ad puncture, depositing them in the body tis-
Imago, natural size Sues beneath the skin. These eggs soon
oud enlarged, hatch, and the young larve, emerging from
UTILITY OF BIRDS IN NATURE. 19
them, feed first upon the fatty portions of the caterpillar
in which they find themselves. The caterpillar thus unwill-
ingly becomes their host, furnishing them with food and
lodging from and within its own substance. When they
have made their growth, and it is nearly time for them to
pupate, they attack the vitals of their host, killing it, and
then pupating either within or upon its body. Soon they
emerge as perfect flies, the females
again seeking other caterpillars as
hosts for their progeny. Often
these parasites do not kill their
oe oy Fig. 12.— Host caterpillar, with
host until it has sought some place cocoons of the parasite upon its
back.
of safety and pupated. Every cat-
erpillar or pupa thus destroyed nourishes one or many of
these parasites, to emerge and attack surviving caterpillars.
The parasites themselves, however, are often attacked in the
same manner by a secondary parasite, which destroys them
precisely as they destroyed the caterpillar. The larger pri-
mary parasites may deposit a single egg or only a few in
each caterpillar, while the smaller ones may deposit the
entire brood in the body of a single caterpillar.
Birds eat both predaceous and parasitic insects. We have
seen that they eat ground beetles, many of which are pro-
vided with acrid secretions that are supposed to render them
disagreeable and offensive to the taste, and so
give them a certain immunity from their ene-
mies. Evidently, however, it takes a very
strong flavor to take the edge off a bird’s
appetite, for birds eat bugs; and any child
who has ever eaten berries from the bushes,
and inadvertently put one of the berry-eating
bugs in his mouth, knows how disgusting their
Fig.13.—Tiger flavor is. There are some useful insects that
beetle; auseful are seldom eaten by birds. The very smallest
by very few are beneath the notice of most birds. The
si ad tiger beetles and some of the useful flies
are so quick that birds find it difficult to catch them.
Wasps and bees, though eaten by some birds, can protect
themselves very well with their stings. Probably, however,
20 USEFUL BIRDS.
birds eat a great many caterpillars containing parasites,
though birds will reject any caterpillars that show signs of
weakness or disease. The question then arises, Is the bird
doing harm by eating caterpillars or other larve containing
parasites? The bird certainly ends the destructive career
of the larva at once. The parasites would have ended it
eventually ; but had it been left to them, it might have gone
on for some time in its destructive career, doing as much
injury as if not parasitized; the parasite merely destroys it
in time to prevent it from propagating its kind. So far the
evidence is in favor of the bird. The question remains,
however, whether the bird and its young would eventually
destroy more caterpillars than would the progeny of the
parasites had they not been eaten by the bird. This question
evidently is unanswerable. Birds act as the primary check
on the increase of destructive insects ; parasitic insects are
the secondary check provided by nature to operate in con-
junction with the birds, or to supplement the regulative
action of birds where the number of birds is insufficient to
check the increase of insects.
Birds sometimes kill many of the imagoes of parasitic
insects in flight, where such insects are numerous. At first
sight, this would seem to condemn the birds; on further
study, it seems probable that this is often a harmless habit.
Where parasitic insects are found in great numbers, it is
probable that the birds destroy mainly the surplus flies,
which otherwise, failing to find hosts for their young, would
merely live out their time and die without issue were they
not killed by the birds. Such harm as birds do in killing
primary parasites may be offset by the killing of secondary
parasites by birds, for this acts as a protection to the pri-
mary parasites.
Certain predaceous bugs feed not only on insects but also
on vegetable food. They also attack other predaceous or
useful insects. Birds, by preventing their undue increase,
may prevent excessive injury to both useful plants and
insects.
All reasoning from known premises leads to one conclusion
UTILITY OF BIRDS IN NATURE. 21
regarding the utility of birds in nature. It may be stated
confidently, as a general rule (not without exceptions, how-
ever), that, in the natural order of things, the species that
is kept within normal numbers without great fluctuations,
whether beast, bird, reptile, batrachian, or insect, will serve
a useful purpose; while the species that increases unduly
will devour too much animal or vegetable food, and, by dis-
turbing the balance of nature, become a pest. It is the
abnormal increase of the gipsy and brown-tail moths and
the “English” Sparrow in this Commonwealth that has
been responsible for the injury they have done. If birds
do well their part in holding in check native insects, small
mammals, reptiles, batrachians, and other forms of life on
which they feed, they have fulfilled their mission, even if
in doing this they destroy some individuals of some species
that are classed as useful.
This, then, is the chief mission of the birds in organic
nature: to fill their peculiar place in preserving the balance
of nature’s forces, —a place that cannot be filled by any
other class of animals.
In much of the foregoing it appears that the birds are
engaged in checking the increase of insects and other ani-
mals, exerting that check constantly when and where it is
most, needed. The vegetable food of birds is perhaps of
less importance, but here also they exercise a restraining
influence by destroying seed as wellas in other ways. They
also exert a beneficial influence by planting seed.
Birds also play a great part in the distribution of plants,
the upbuilding and fertilizing of barren islands, and a minor
part in the distribution of insects. Wild-fowl and Herons
may sometimes carry small seeds for many miles embedded
in particles of mud which adhere to their feet. Where this
mud drops from their feet, the seeds may sprout and grow.
The fruit-eating birds are among the most valuable of tree
planters, distributing the seeds farand wide. Certain insects
which cling to the feet or feathers of birds are sometimes
distributed in this way. The part taken by birds in forest
planting and fertilizing barren lands will be taken up far-
22 USEFUL BIRDS.
ther on, in connection with their relations to forestry and
agriculture.
Taken all in all, the relations of birds to the natural world
are beneficent. Evidently birds are an essential part of
nature’s great plan. This being the case, they must be
serviceable to man also, for man, the animal, is a mere inte-
gral part of nature.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 23
CHAPTER I.
THE VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN.
Birds are classed as useful or injurious only as they affect
man or his property. In an uninhabited country birds can-
not be ranked as beneficial or harmful, good or bad, for there
is noagriculture. There the earth, untroubled by man, brings
forth vegetation, and animals after their kind. Nature’s laws,
working in harmony, need none of man’s assistance. The
condition of the earth before man appeared is typified in the
Biblical account of the garden of Eden.
PRIMITIVE MAN’S RELATIONS TO NATURE.
We have seen that under such natural conditions all birds
are essential to the general welfare, each filling well its
appointed place. But trouble and discord come to Eden.
Man appears, and becomes the dominant power on the earth.
He sets up artificial standards of his own, and bids nature
conform to them. He is constantly at war with nature. He
classes wild creatures as injurious, provided they either in-
jure his person, or cause him loss by destroying or harming
any of his property or any of the wild animals or plants
which he regards as useful. He considers all wild creatures
beneficial that contribute directly or indirectly to his own
welfare, or to the increase in value of his property.
He is often in error, even from his own standpoint, in
thus classifying animals, owing to an insufficient knowledge
of their food habits ; but the principle holds good, and stand-
ards change with the acquisition of knowledge.
Man in a savage state lived, like other animals, in harmony
with nature. At first he practised no agriculture and domes-
ticated no animals. He made war mainly upon his fellows
and the larger beasts of prey, killing them in self-defence
or for food. (It seems prebable that primitive man was
a cannibal.) Otherwise, he fed altogether upon the wild
24 USEFUL BIRDS.
products of forest, meadow, sea, lake, or river. The only
creatures that he then could regard as injurious were those
that attacked his own person or the persons of his family.
Any irruption of animals, such as vast herds of deer, bison,
or antelopes, hordes of monkeys or rats, flights of birds or
locusts, outbreaks of caterpillars or other creatures, was
about as likely to benefit as to injure him. For instance,
when locusts became so numerous as to destroy a part or all
of his vegetable food, he followed the example of other
creatures, and, by feeding for the time on the superabundant
locusts, exerted an influence toward restoring the balance
of nature. (There are still savage tribes in various parts
of the earth that eat monkeys, rats, locusts, grubs, or
caterpillars. )
In times of plenty primitive man feasted, as did other
animals ; and in times of want, like them, he starved. But
usually he was indifferent to any ordinary injury done to the
animal or vegetable life around him, .as he owned no prop-
erty, and could readily move his camp from a region of
want to one of plenty.
CHANGED RELATIONS PRODUCED BY AGRICULTURE.
With the beginning of agricultural practice, however, all
this was changed. When man began to domesticate animals,
he faced immediately a host of enemies. Wild animals and
birds attacked his cattle, horses, sheep, goats, and hogs, or
devoured their young. Tormenting insects stampeded his
herds, or carried disease and death among them. His poul-
try were decimated by scores of rapacious animals. When
he began to plant seed and raise grain, both his growing
and his garnered crops were attacked by a host of ene-
mies; for now he had begun to disturb nature’s balance,
and nature asserted herself in the effort to resume her inter-
rupted sway. This was the beginning of a war with nature
which will never cease so long as man inhabits the earth ;
for the agriculturist does not work altogether with nature,
but largely against her. Most of the animal and vegetable
forms that he produces are at variance with those produced
by nature, and must be continually fostered and protected
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 25
if they are to maintain their artificial characters and excel-
lences. Left to themselves, the various breeds of domesti-
cated Pigeons would all disappear, merging into the original
Dove from whence they sprang. All artificial varieties of
animals, plants, and fruits would, under nature, become, in
time, like the wild stock from which they originated. Hence
man must wage war continually against organic nature, in
order to maintain his artificial standards against her inex-
orable laws.
The beginning of agriculture was the first step toward
civilization as well, for the necessity of remaining near his
crops to guard them from their enemies compelled the prim-
itive farmer to erect a permanent habitation. This took his
attention from war and the chase, for much of his time was
now occupied in tilling the soil and caring for his crops and
animals.
- The slow growth of primitive agriculture in the older
civilized countries gave time for a gradual adjustment of the
forces of nature to the new conditions established and main-
tained by man. The gradual or partial clearing away of the
forests occupied centuries. The planting of crops merely
kept pace with the natural increase of population, while
the destruction of wild animals and their replacement with
domesticated species were similarly gradual and progressive.
So, although in the older countries agriculture suffered much
from the pests to which its operations must always give rise,
it remained for the peopling of newer lands to develop the
greatest difficulties in the path of the farmer.
Agriculture produces an increased food supply. The
population increases correspondingly, and the overflow seeks
new fields. In these new lands, of which America is the
most prominent example, the conditions of civilization and
agriculture have replaced with marked rapidity those of
savagery and primeval nature.
MAN AT WAR WITH NATURE IN THE NEW WORLD.
All the greater changes that were effected gradually by
man in Europe, where, in the course of centuries, civiliza-
tion was slowly evolved from savagery, —all these stupen-
26 USEFUL BIRDS.
dous changes, — were wrought here in a few years by the
tide of immigration from the eastern world.
In many communities only a score of years elapsed be-
tween the subjugation of the unbroken wilderness and the
building of a farming town or growing city. In Massachu-
setts the settlers cut down the forest; killed off most of the
larger mammals and birds ; imported and bred horses, cattle,
and poultry ; cleared and planted much of the arable land ;
introduced many new plants; and rapidly changed the ap-
pearance of the country from that of a wilderness to that of
an agricultural colony. Thirty years after the landing of
the Pilgrim Fathers at Plymouth, eastern Massachusetts was
well colonized; with several growing seaport towns; with
prosperous farms, fertile fields and green pastures; with
flocks and herds grazing on many a hill, where the wild
Indian and the red deer formerly roamed.
All these changes, taking place so rapidly, produced great
disturbances in the economy of nature. As the wolf, lynx,
puma, and bear were killed or driven away, the smaller
animals on which they had formerly preyed increased in
numbers and attacked the crops. Crows, Blackbirds, and
many insects, finding in the grain crops new sources of food
supply, swarmed upon them and multiplied exceedingly.
Birds and insects attacked the cultivated fruit. Thousands
of acres of cleared meadow land were producing crops of
grass. Given this increased food supply, locusts and other
grass-eating insects increased in numbers. The settlers,
meantime, were destroying the Heath Hen, Quail, Plover,
Blackbirds, Hawks, and Crows, the natural enemies of the
locusts. As time went on, many new plants were introduced
from Europe, and in some cases insect pests unwittingly
were brought with them. The two succeeding centuries
brought about a tremendous immigration from Europe. As
settlement extended into the western States, great fields of
wheat and other grains were established, covering the plains
in some instances as far as the eye could see. Hundreds of
thousands of acres were planted to orchards and vineyards;
great areas near the cities were devoted to garden vegetables ;
north and south, corn, wheat, and cotton clothed the land.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 27
THE INCREASE OF INSECT PESTS.
Insects introduced from foreign lands found here a para-
dise, in which to multiply, in the great areas planted year
after year to the same crops. Having escaped their native
enemies, they had come to an abundance of food in a land
where many of the insect-eating birds and other insectivo-
rous animals had been much reduced in number by the unwise
policy of the settlers. Hence the rate of increase of im-
ported insect pests in America has far exceeded that of the
same insects in their native lands.
Certain native American insects, finding their food plants
destroyed by the cutting down of the forests or thé break-
ing up of the prairie, turned their attention to the crops
of the farmer, and became important pests.
Such are the cutworms (Noctuide) ; : their
name is legion. Others, having been reached
in their desert or mountain homes by the
advance of civilization, left their natural food
for the more succulent plants raised by man,
and so spread over the country from farm pig. 14.—chinch
to farm. Such are the chinch bug and the an a en-
Colorado potato beetle, which, as civilization
advanced westward, met it and spread toward the east.
The enormous losses which have occurred in the United
States from the destruction of growing crops by insects must
seem incredible to those who do not realize how vast are the
numbers of insects, how stupendous their power of multi-
plication, how insatiable their voracity.
When we fully appreciate the consuming powers of insects,
they assume an economic importance greater than can be
accorded to the ravening beast of prey. Let us consider
briefly, then, the potency for evil that lies hidden in the tiny
but innumerable eggs of injurious insects, which require only
the warmth of the summer sun to release from confinement
their destructive energies.
28 USEFUL BIRDS.
THE NUMBER OF INSECTS.
The number of insect species is greater by far than that
of the species of all other living creatures combined. More
than three hundred thousand have been described. There
are many thousands of undescribed species in museums.
Dr. Lintner, the late distinguished State entomologist of
New York, considered it not improbable that there were a
million species of insects. The number of individual insects
is beyond human comprehension or computation.
Dr. Lintner says that he saw at a glance, in a small extent
of roadway near Albany, more individuals of a single species
of snow flea, as computed by him, than there are human
beings on the entire face of the earth. A small cherry tree
ten feet in height was found by Dr. Fitch to be infested with
an aphid or plant louse. He estimated (first counting the
number of these insects on a leaf, the number of leaves on a
branch and the number of branches on the tree) that there
were twelve million plant lice on the tree; and this was only
one tree of a row similarly infested. To give the reader an
approximate idea of the number of insects on the tree, it
was stated that, were a man to count them singly and as
rapidly as he could speak, it would require eleven months’
labor at ten hours a day to complete the enumeration.!
In the days of their abundance the Rocky Mountain locusts
in flight filled the air and hid the sun. From the high peaks
of the Sierra Nevada they were seen filling the valleys below
and the air above as far as a powerful field glass could bring
the insects within focus. The chinch bug in countless mil-
lions infests the grain fields over towns, counties, and States.
The army worm moves at times in solid masses, destroying
the crops in its path.
THE REPRODUCTIVE CAPACITY OF INSECTS.
Insects are enormously productive, and, were the progeny
of one pair allowed to reproduce without check, they would
cover, in time, the entire habitable earth.
" Our Insect Enemies, by J. A. Lintner. Sixteenth Annual Report, New
Jersey State Board of Agriculture, 1888-89, pp. 293, 294.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 29
The rapidity of propagation shown by some insects is per-
haps without a parallel in the animal world.
In order to give some idea of the powers of multiplication
of the Colorado potato beetle, the Canadian
Entomologist states that all its transformations
are effected in fifty days; so that the result of
a single pair, if allowed to increase without
molestation, would in one season amount to eee ais
over sixty millions.} beetle.
Speaking of the great power of multiplication shown by
plant lice or aphids, Dr. Lintner says that Professor Riley,
in his studies of the hop vine aphis (Phorodon humuli),
has observed thirteen generations of the species in the
year. Now, if we assume the average number of young
produced by each female to be one hundred, and that every
individual attains maturity and produces its full complement
of young (which, however, never occurs in nature), the
number of the twelfth brood alone (not counting those of
all of the preceding broods of the same year) would be
10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 (ten sextillions) of indi-
viduals. Where, as in this instance, figures fail to convey
any adequate conception of numbers, let us take space and
the velocity of light as measures. Were this brood mar-
shalled in line with ten individuals to a linear inch touching
one another, the procession would extend to the sun (a space
which light traverses in eight minutes), and beyond it to the
nearest fixed star (traversed by light only in six years), and
still onward in space beyond the most distant star that the
strongest telescope may bring to our view, — to a point so
inconceivably remote that light could only reach us from it
in twenty-five hundred years.
The remotest approach to such unchecked multiplication
on the part of this insect might paralyze the hop-growing
industry in one season. While the aphids may represent
the extreme of fecundity, there are thousands of insect
species the unchecked increase of any one of which would
soon overrun a continent. Mr. A. H. Kirkland has com-
1 Report of Townend Glover, entomologist, in Annual Report of the United
States Commissioner of Agriculture, 1871, p. 74.
30 USEFUL BIRDS.
puted that the unrestricted increase of the gipsy moth would
be so great that the progeny of one pair would be numerous
enough in eight years to devour all the foliage in the United
States.
THE VORACITY OF INSECTS.
Many insects are remarkably destructive because of the
enormous amount of food which they must consume to grow
rapidly to maturity. Many caterpillars daily eat twice their
weight of leaves; which is as if an ox were to devour, every
twenty-four hours, three-quarters of a ton of grass.1
This voracity and rapid growth may be shown by the
statement of a few facts. A certain flesh-feeding larva will
consume in twenty-four hours two hundred times its original
weight ; a parallel to which, in the human race, would be an
infant consuming, in the first day of its existence, fifteen
hundred pounds of food. There are vegetable feeders,
caterpillars, which during their progress to maturity, within
thirty days, increase in size ten thousand times. To equal
this remarkable growth, a man at his maturity would have
to weigh forty tons. In view of such statements, need we
wonder that the insect world is so destructive and so potent
a power for harm ??
Mr. Leopold Trouvelot, who introduced the gipsy moth
into this country, was occupied for some time in raising
silkworms in Medford, Mass. He made a special study of
the American silkworm ( Telea polyphemus). Regarding its
food and growth he says :—
It is astonishing how rapidly the larva grows, and one who has had
no experience in the matter could hardly believe what an amount of
food is devoured by these little creatures. One experiment which I
made can give some idea of it. When the young worm hatches out, it
1 A probable cause for this voracity in the case of herbivorous larve is that the
stomachs do not have the power of dissolving the vegetable matter received into
them, but merely of extracting from it a juice. This is proved both by their
excrement, which consists of coiled-up and hardened particles of leaf, which,
when put into water, expand like tea, and by the great proportion which the
excrement bears to the quantity of food consumed (Kirby and Spence’s Ento-
mology, p. 259).
? Our Insect Enemies, by J. A. Lintner. Sixteenth Annual Report, New
Jersey State Board of Agriculture, 1888-89, p. 295,
PLATE I.--The American Silkworm Moth (Telea polyphemus).
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 31
weighs one-twentieth of a grain; when ten days old, it weighs one-half
a grain, or ten times the original weight; when twenty days old, it
weighs three grains, or sixty times the original weight ; when thirty days
old, it weighs thirty-one grains, or six hundred and twenty times the
original weight; when forty days old, it weighs ninety grains, or eight-
een hundred times the original weight; and when fifty-six days old, it
weighs two hundred and seven grains, or forty-one hundred and forty
times the original weight.
When a worm is thirty days old, it will have consumed about ninety
grains of food; but when fifty-six days old it is fully grown, and has
consumed not less than one hundred and twenty*oak leaves, weighing
three-fourths of a pound; besides this, it has drunk not less than one-
half an ounce of water. So the food taken by a single silkworm in
fifty-six days equals in weight eighty-six thousand times the primitive
weight of the worm. Of this, about one-fourth of a pound becomes
excrementitious matter, two hundred and seven grains are assimilated,
and over five ounces have evaporated. What a destruction of leaves
this single species of insect could make, if only a one-hundredth part
of the eggs laid came to maturity! A few years would be sufficient for
the propagation of a number large enough to devour all the leaves of
our forests.!
When we consider the dangers arising from the immense
numbers, fecundity and voracity of insects, the fact that
insects new to cultivated crops are continually appearing
becomes a source of grave apprehension.
THE GREAT LOSS TO AMERICAN AGRICULTURE BY
INSECT RAVAGES.
Economic entomologists, who are constantly increasing
our knowledge regarding insect pests, discover every year
new species attacking important crops or trees. Dr. Lintner
made a list of the insects injuring apple trees in the United
States, which was published in the appendix to his first
report as entomologist of New York State. It contained
one hundred and seventy-six species, while large though
lesser numbers have been found on the plum, pear, peach,
and cherry.
The study of the insect enemies of the forest trees of the
United States has not yet progressed far enough to deter-
1 The American Silkworm, by L. Trouvelot. American Naturalist, Vol. I,
p. 85.
32 USEFUL BIRDS.
mine with approximate accuracy the numbers of insects that
infest our forest trees. The forest insects of some sections
of Europe have been studied longer, and the numbers of in-
sects found injuring the principal trees are surprising. Kal-
tenbach enumerates five hundred and thirty-seven species
of insects, from central Europe, injurious to the oak; to the
elm he ascribes one hundred and seven. The poplars feed
two hundred and sixty-four species; the willows harbor
three hundred and ninety-six ; the birches, two hundred and
seventy; the alder, one hundred and nineteen; the beech,
one hundred and fifty-four; the hazel, ninety-seven; and
the hornbeam, eighty-eight. Among the coniferous trees,
the pines, larch, spruce, and fir, collectively, are attacked
by two hundred and ninety-nine species of insects.?
Dr. Packard enumerated over four hundred species which
prey upon our oaks, and believed it not improbable that
ultimately the number of species found on the oaks of the
United States would be from six hundred to eight hundred
or even one thousand.?
The list of insects which feed on grasses, cereals, field and
garden crops is very large and constantly growing, for it is
continually receiving accessions from both native and foreign
sources. The destructiveness of some of these insects is so
enormous and widespread that the financial loss resulting
therefrom amounts to a heavy annual tax on the people of
the United States. Hence since the first settlement of the
country the amount of this annual tax has been increasing.
In 1854 the loss in New York State alone from the ravages |
of the insignificant wheat midge (Diéplosis tritic’), as esti-
mated by the secretary of the New York State Agricultural
Society, was fifteen million dollars. Whole fields of wheat
were left ungarnered. So destructive was this insect in the
following years as to stop the raising of white wheat, and
reduce the value of all wheat lands forty per cent.®
1 Die Pflanzenfeinde aus der Klasse der Insekten.
? Insects Injurious to Forest and Shade Trees, by A. S. Packard. Fifth Report
of the United States Entomological Commission, 1886-90, p. 48.
3 Report on the Rocky Mountain Locust, by A. S. Packard. Ninth Annual
Report of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territo-
ries, 1875, p. 709.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 33
In 1856, in Livingston County, New York, two thousand
acres on flats which would have yielded thirty bushels of
wheat per acre were not harvested because of the destruc-
tive work of this insect.1
Dr. C. L. Marlatt, of the Bureau of Entomology of the
United States Department of Agriculture, who has made
careful calculations of the loss. still
occasioned by the Hessian fly (Cecido-
myta destructor) in the wheat-growing
States, says that in comparatively few
years does it cause a loss of less than
ten per cent. of the crop. On the val-
uation of the crop of 1904 this would
amount to over fifty million dollars.
Dr. Marlatt states that in the year 1900
the loss in the wheat-growing States Figs 16. “iaadinn ay,
from this tiny midge undoubtedly ap- ee
proached one hundred million dollars.?
The chinch bug (Blissus leucopterus) attacks many staple
crops, and has been a seriously destructive pest in the
Mississippi valley States for many years, where it injures
chiefly wheat and corn. Dr. Shimer in his notes on this
insect estimates the loss caused by it in the Mississippi
valley in 1864 at one hundred million dollars,? while Dr..
Riley gives the loss in that year as seventy-three million
dollars in Illinois alone.t These are only a few of the
extreme losses. Year after year the injuries from the
depredations of this bug have amounted to many millions
of dollars.
The cotton worm (Alabama argillacea) has been known
as a serious pest to the cotton crop for more than a century.
The average loss in the cotton States from this caterpillar
' First Annual Report on the Injurious and Other Insects of the State of New
York, by J. A. Lintner, 1882, p. 6.
2? The Annual Loss occasioned by Destructive Insects in the United States, by
C. L. Marlatt. Yearbook, United States Department of Agriculture, 1904, p. 467.
3 Report on the Rocky Mountain Locust, by A. S. Packard. Ninth Annual
Report of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Territories,
1875, p. 697.
4 First Annual Report on the Injurious and Other Insects of the State of New
York, by J. A. Lintner, 1882, p. 7.
34 USEFUL BIRDS.
for fourteen years following the civil war was estimated at
fifteen million dollars per year.
In 1873 the injury to the cotton crop reached twenty-five
million dollars, and later averaged from twenty-five million
to fifty million dollars annually.2- Now a new enemy, the
Mexican cotton boll weevil (Anthonomus grandis), threatens
equal destruction.
The Rocky Mountain locust (Melanoplus spretus) began
to destroy crops as soon as the country it inhabits was set-
tled, and is still injurious. From time to time its enormous
flights have traversed a great part of the Mississippi valley.
It reached a maximum of destructiveness from 1874 to 1877,
when the total loss from its ravages in Kansas, Nebraska,
Iowa, Missouri, and neighboring States, including injury by
depression of business and general ruin, was estimated at
two hundred million dollars.?
In those years this devastating insect swept over the Missis-
sippi valley. Wherever its vast flights alighted or its young
developed, they destroyed nearly all vegetation, ruining
great numbers of farmers, causing a famine in the land, and
driving many people to emigration. This was an extreme
calamity, such as is not likely to occur again.
A still larger but more widely distributed loss from insect
pests, however, is still borne annually by the American
people. Dr. Lintner states his belief that the annual and
periodical injury caused by cutworms in the United States
is greater than that caused by the Rocky Mountain locust.
In September, 1868, Prof. D. B. Walsh, editor of the
American Entomologist, estimated that the country then
suffered to the amount of three hundred million dollars
annually from the depredations of noxious insects. By the
census of 1875 the agricultural products of this country were
valued at two billion, five hundred million dollars. Of this
* Fourth Report of the United States Entomological Commission, by C. V.
Riley, 1885, p. 3.
? Report on the Rocky Mountain Locust, by A. S. Packard. Ninth Annual
Report of the United States Geological and Geographical Survey of the Terri-
tories, 1875, p. 591.
8 Report on the Rocky Mountain Locust, by Riley, Packard, and Thomas.
First Report of the United States Entomological Commission, 1877, pp. 115~122.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 35
amount, Dr. Packard says that in all probability we annually
lose over two hundred million dollars from the attacks of
injurious insects. In the report of the Department of Agri-
culture for 1884 (p. 324) the losses occasioned by insects
injurious to agriculture in the United States, it is said, are
variously estimated at from three hundred million to four
hundred million dollars annually.
Prof. C. V. Riley, in response to a letter of inquiry, in
1890, stated that no very recent estimate of the injury done
by insects had been made; but that he had estimated, some
time previously, that the injury done to crops in the United
States by insects exceeded three hundred million dollars
annually.
Dr. James Fletcher, in his annual address as president of
the Society of Economic Entomologists, in Washington, in
1891, stated that the agricultural products of the United
States were then estimated at about three billion, eight hun-
dred million dollars. It was believed that a sum equal to
about one-tenth of this amount, or three hundred and eighty
million dollars, was lost annually through the ravages of
injurious insects.
It is evident that, in spite of the improved methods of
fighting insects, the aggregate loss from this source increases
in proportion as the land under cultivation increases.
The most recent estimate of the loss occasioned by insect
injury in the United States which has come to my notice is
that of Dr. C. L. Marlatt, who by careful estimates approxi-
mates the percentage of loss to cereal products, hay, cotton,
tobacco, truck crops, sugars, fruits, forests, miscellaneous
crops, animal products, and products in storage.
Dr. Marlatt attributes an annual loss of eighty million
dollars to the corn crop alone, and approximates the loss to
the wheat crop at one hundred million dollars each year.
The injury to the hay crop is estimated at five hundred and
thirty thousand dollars, while the codling moth alone is be-
lieved to injure fruit crops to the amount of twenty million
dollars annually.
This statement, based on the value of farm products as
given in the reports of the Bureau of Statistics of the United
36 USEFUL BIRDS.
States Department of Agriculture for 1904, gives the loss
from insect depredations for that year as seven hundred and
ninety-five million, one hundred thousand dollars; and this
is believed to be a conservative estimate of the tax now im-
posed by injurious insects on the people of the United States,
without reckoning the millions of dollars that are expended
annually in labor and insecticides in the fight against insects.+
LOSSES BY INSECT RAVAGES IN MASSACHUSETTS.
The proportion of this loss that Massachusetts is called
upon to bear has not received the attention that it deserves.
Some figures, however, may be given. In 1861 the army
worm (probably Heliophila unipuncta) swept eastern Mas-
sachusetts. The damage done to crops, according to Dr.
Packard, exceeded five hundred thousand dollars.22 We have
no estimates of the loss occasioned by more recent invasions
of thisinsect. Prof. C. H. Fernald ® estimates that an amount
of cranberries equal to one-third the possible crop of the Cape
Cod region is annually destroyed by insects. Thus a sum
not less than five hundred thousand dollars is yearly lost to
the people of that region.
In 1890 Dr. Henry H. Goodell, president of the Massa-
chusetts Agricultural College, stated that it was costing the
farmers of the United States two million dollars, and the
farmers of Massachusetts eighty thousand dollars, each year,
to hold the Colorado potato beetle in check by the use of
Paris green.+*
In 1901 Hon. J. W. Stockwell, then secretary of the
Massachusetts State Board of Agriculture, asked me to esti-
mate the annual loss to the Commonwealth through the rav-
ages of insect pests. My estimate, which seemed to me at
* The Annual Loss occasioned by Destructive Insects in the United States, by
C. L. Marlatt. Yearbook, United States Department of Agriculture, 1904, p. 464.
* First Report on Injurious and Beneficial Insects of Massachusetts, by A. S.
Packard. Annual Report of the Massachusetts State Board of Agriculture, 1870,
Part I, p. 353.
5 In Bulletin No. 19 of the Hatch Experiment Station of the Massachusetts
Agricultural College, Professor Fernald gives statistics of the cranberry crop,
and evidence from which his estimate is made.
* Agricultural Education, by H. H. Goodell. Sixth Annual Report of the
Rhode Island State Board of Agriculture, 1891, p. 186.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 37
the time a most safe and conservative one, was three million,
one hundred thousand dollars. Mr. Stockwell also asked
Dr. H. T. Fernald and Mr. A. H. Kirkland, both expert
economic entomologists, to make, independently, a similar
estimate. Their replies follow, showing how they made up
their figures. These gentlemen had every facility for obtain-
ing knowledge of insect injury in the Commonwealth. It
will be seen that their approximations considerably exceeded
my own. Dr. H. T. Fernald says :1—
Years ago a number of experts, figuring independently, came to the
conclusion that for farm, market-garden and orchard crops the loss by
the attacks of insects in an average year would represent one-tenth of
the value of the crop, or about two million, six hundred thousand dollars
for Massachusetts. Recently, however, prominent entomologists have
expressed the opinion that this per cent. istoolow. Three factors have
caused this change: first, the concentration of crops of the same kind
into large contiguous acreage; second, the introduction of over one
hundred pests from foreign countries, which have been here long enough
to make their presence seriously felt; and third, the great reduction in
the number of insectivorous birds. ~
I believe it will be entirely safe to take fifteen per cent. of the crop
valuation of Massachusetts, and that you will be sufficiently conserva-
tive in using that amount as representing part of the damage. I have
never scen a cherry tree killed by plant lice, yet I have often seen lice
so abundant on cherry trees as to much reduce the crop, which is true
of a large proportion of our crops; and it is loss of this kind which is
covered by the fifteen per cent. estimate, . . . but how are we to place
a money value on the defoliation of an elm tree unless it be repeated
year after year until the tree dies? I would be inclined to add, to the
fifteen per cent. estimate already given, two hundred and fifty thousand
dollars for labor, apparatus, poison, etc., used in the fight against
insects, and another two hundred and fifty thousand dollars to cover
damage actually done, but which cannot be reduced to figures, making
a total yearly damage of four million, four hundred thousand dollars for
Massachusetts.
Mr. Kirkland says : ! —
The best figures available for estimating the loss caused by pests in
this State are those of the 1895 census. From the report of this census
T have taken figures giving the value of certain crops notably attacked
‘ Report of Secretary J. W. Stockwell, Annual Report of the Massachusetts
State Board of Agriculture, 1901, pp. xiii, xiv.
38 USEFUL BIRDS.
by insects, and have estimated in each case the probable average yearly
reduction in value caused by these pests. The data used are given be-
low. Ihave tried to make a conservative estimate in the case of each
product, since, to have any value, such an estimate should fall below
rather than above the actual amount. Even then the figures afford
material for serious reflection on the part of agriculturists.
Percentage
Value Amount
Baoouets of Product. conde: of Damage.
Greenhouse products, 2 i $1,749,070 10 $174,907 00
Hothouse and hotbed products, oa) 8 97,227 5 4,861 35
Nursery products, . o> Gal 182,906 15 27,435 90
Wood products,. . . Sy ad os 2,780,314 20 556,062 80
Cereal products, i ca Gs 1,104,578 5 55,228 90
Fruits, berries, and nuts, ib ot os 2,850,585 25 712,646 25
Hay and fodder de B. sah Ss 8 12,491,090 10 1,249,109 00
Vegetables,. . ee ee oe 6,389,533 20 1,277,906 60
Tobacco, me ee Aa 5 Ran oe 544,968 10 54,496 80
Property : —
Fruit trees, vines, etc... . . . 7,924,878 10 792,487 80
Totals, . © & a & $36,115,149 $4,905,142 40
Assuming the accuracy of these data, and exclusive of the damage
wrought by insects to our woodlands, street trees, parks, ete., we have
in round figures five million dollars as the average annual damage from
insects to agricultural products and property in this Commonwealth.
While the cost of insect injury is enormous, the expense
of fighting injurious insects in the attempt to protect crops
and trees from their ravages is proportionately great. In
recent years Massachusetts has had, and is still having, a
costly experience in attempting to control or suppress an
imported insect.
The gipsy moth (Porthetria dispar), a well-known pest
of European countries, was introduced into Medford, Mass.,
by Mr. Leopold Trouvelot, in 1868 or 1869. Twenty years
later the moths had increased in numbers to such an extent
that they were destroying the trees and shrubbery in that
section of Medford where they were first liberated.
They swarmed over the houses of the inhabitants, invaded
their gardens, and became such a public nuisance that in
1890 the Legislature appropriated fifty thousand dollars for
their extermination. It was learned within the next two years
that the moths had spread over thirty towns. The State
CPUBLLNS JaIsy) ‘eo0¢eT ‘eune ‘sxeqTd1a3e0
Aq payeysvaop ‘uojsurry ‘yteg syooy AtmojoueW, ‘qo Asdig sy} jo ssouaatjonissq euL—‘I] ALWId
CS68T ‘AMIS VY JO pIvog 93819 syasnToessB 94 JO yoder
Tenuue st} WOL,) “syteq puelpoo~, ut yo Asdiy ayy jo s33q ayy sutfoysap jo yo“, sAtsusdxq — ‘TIT | LW1d
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 39
Board of Agriculture was given charge of the work in 1891,
and over one million dollars were expended within the next
ten years in the attempt to exterminate the insect. As at
the expiration of that time all the larger moth colonies had
been destroyed, the Legislature, deeming further expendi-
ture unwise, gave up the work, despite the protest of the
Board of Agriculture, and its prediction that a speedy rise
of the moth would follow the cessation of concerted effort
against it. This prediction has been abundantly fulfilled,
and the policy of the Board has been fully justified.
Dr. Marlatt, who in 1904 visited the region infested by the
moth, reported to the Bureau of Entomology at Washington
that the people of the infested district were then fighting the
insect at a greater annual cost than that formerly assumed
by the State. Since the State gave up the work, a single
citizen, Gen. Samuel C. Lawrence of Medford, has expended
over seventy-five thousand dollars to protect the trees and
plants on his estate.
Finally, in 1905 the Legislature was obliged to renew the
fight, and appropriate the sum of three hundred thousand
dollars for work against both this insect and another im-
ported pest, —the brown-tail moth (Huproctis chrysorrhea) ,
which had been introduced into Somerville some time in the
latter part of the nineteenth century.
The State has also been obliged to call on municipalities
and individuals to assist in the work of suppressing these
moths, at an annual expense to those concerned which ex-
ceeds all previous yearly expenditures for this purpose.
These insects have gained a much larger territory than
ever before, and thousands of acres of woodland have been
attacked by them during the present year (1905), and many
pine and other trees have been killed.
The gipsy moth has been found in Rhode Island, Connect-
icut, and New Hampshire, and the brown-tail moth is also
spreading into other States.
The prospect now seems to be that our protective expenses
against these two insects, as well as the injury done by them,
will increase constantly ; and that other States also will be
put to similar expense, with no prospect of permanent relief
40 USEFUL BIRDS.
save by such checks as may come, in time, through natural
causes.
In view of the dangers threatened by insect increase and
voracity, how fortunate it is for the human race that so many
counter-checks are provided against the multiplication of
these destructive creatures. If we could increase by so much
as one percent. the efficiency of the natural enemies of
insects, a large proportion of the loss occasioned by insect
injury might be saved. Hence the importance of the study
of these natural enemies, among which birds hold a high
place.
THE CAPACITY OF BIRDS FOR DESTROYING PESTS.
When we realize the losses that insects are capable of in-
flicting, we see at once that birds, in their capacity of insect
destroyers, continually operate to prevent the destruction of
some of our most important industries. If birds are present
in sufficient numbers, they will prevent the excessive increase
of any kind of a pest which they will eat.
The number of birds required: to accomplish this highly
desirable end need not be very large in comparison with the
number of insects; for each bird can devour an incredible
number of insects, and the young birds in the nests require
more of this food, in proportion to their size, than do their
parents.
The Digestion of Birds.
The digestive organs of birds are so constructed and
equipped that they can both contain and dispose of a very
large quantity of food. The stomachs of many species
quickly separate the indigestible portions of the food from
the digestible parts, and the former are thrown out of the
mouth, thus relieving the stomach of much worthless mate-
rial, and enabling the bird immediately to consume more
food. The alimentary canal (including the crop, gullet or
cesophagus, the first division of the stomach or proventricu-
lus, the gizzard, gigerium or second division of the stomach,
the intestine and the cloaca) consists of a tube reaching from
mouth to anus, conveying the food. The nutritious qualities
of the food are drawn off by the lacteals as it passes; the
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 41
refuse is voided. Thisis digestion. The food is often manip-
ulated, crushed, or divided by the beak. It then receives
saliva from the mouth, and passes through the pharynx into
either the gullet (a muscular and membranous tube) or crop
(a pouch), as the case may be, organs capable
of great distention, and connecting with the
first division of the stomach. Here, then,
is the first receptacle of the food. Birds
of prey, Herons and some other large birds
sometimes fill the gullet to the very mouth,
while awaiting the digestion of the food in
a stomach already full. The Pelicans have
also another great receptacle or pouch, ex-
ternal and beneath the beak, where a store
of food can be carried. Many of the smaller
birds also are able, after filling the stomach,
to stow away a still larger supply of food
in the gullet. The stomach is large, and
usually capable, by distention, of contain-
ing a considerable quantity of food. The 2-92
food passes from the gullet or the crop to pig, on ‘Alimen-
the proventriculus or glandular portion of — tary canal of Bluc-
bird, reduced; after
the stomach. This is where the process auduvon. a,,gu!-
of digestion begins. Mixed with salivary, Ce
ingluvial, and proventricular secretions, the — sizzard; ef, h, in-
7 testine; i, cloaca.
food next passes to the gizzard or muscular
division of the stomach, where the food grist is ground fine.
Among seed-eating birds the heavy, powerful muscles of
this portion of the stomach are, with the rough, calloused
stomach lining, assisted in their work by sand and gravel
which are swallowed. This mineral matter takes the place
of teeth in grinding the food.
In vegetable-feeding birds the intestine is very long and
much coiled, while the digestive tract is generally shorter
and simpler in the flesh-eating and fish-eating species. All
the processes of digestion are remarkably rapid. The sali-
vary glands, the liver and the pancreas all quickly pour their
copious secretions into the alimentary canal; the food is
chylified after impregnation with the biliary and pancreatic
Sy)
rN
S
42 USEFUL BIRDS.
fluids ; the chyle is drawn off by the lacteals, and the residue
is excreted. The vigor, perfection, and rapidity of these
processes in insect-eating birds are such as might be expected
among animals of such high temperature, perfect respiration,
and rapid circulation. :
The various dilations of the digestive tract serve well their
purpose of enabling the bird to consume the large amount
of food necessary for its maintenance. Digestion is partic-
ularly rapid in the growing young of most birds, for they
require not only food sufficient to sustain life, but an extra
supply as well to enable them to increase daily in size, and
to grow, in a few days, those wonderful appendages that we
call feathers.
The Growth of Young Birds.
The growth of many birds from the egg to the hour of-
flight requires less time than is needed by some insects to
reach the flight stage. It is most significant that young birds
can develop as rapidly as can many in-
sects on which they feed, for it shows how
readily, under favorable conditions, the
increase of birds might keep proportion-
f ate pace with that of insects. Weed and
= = Dearborn, in their interesting manual, en-
Fig. 18-— Young Cedar titled “Birds in their Relations to Man,”
ys
naked, blind,andhelp- state that they watched four young Song
less, with mouth open
for food. Reduced; SParrows that were out of the nest on the
nee Tiere eighth day. Mr. Owen records another
instance where a brood of young Song Sparrows were
fledged and left the nest within the same period.! Probably
this is exceptional ; but many of the smaller birds rear their
young from the egg to the first flight within two or three
weeks. Mr. Owen found that on one particular day this
family of five young Song Sparrows increased in average
weight forty-eight per cent., while the smallest bird gained
fifty-five per cent. in a single day.
The young of perching birds (Insessores) come into the
world tiny creatures, either naked or covered with down,
' A Family of Nestlings, by D. E. Owen. The Auk, Vol. XVI, No. 3, July,
1899, pp. 221-225.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 43
blind, and helpless; yet in a few days, or at most a few
weeks, they havé grown to nearly the size of their parents,
and produced a perfect
suit of feathers, including
the strong quills of wings
and tail. In a few weeks
more they are able to
begin a journey of hun-
dreds or thousands of
miles over land and sea,
in their first migration.
The young of precocial
birds, such as Grouse,
Snipe and Plover, are
able to run about soon
after they are hatched. i
Young Grouse learn to fly Fig. 19.— Young Cedar Birds, less than three
when quite small, but they Bee
develop more slowly than do the young of the smaller
altricial birds. It is difficult, therefore, to determine the
amount of food they
require, as they leave
the nest at once and
wander from place to
place, picking up
their own food.
The young of the
altricial perching
birds, however, re-
main quite helpless in
the nest until nearly
fledged, affording an
Fig. 20.— Young Grouse, just from the egg, but able excellent opportunity
rN: for the investigator
to determine the amount and character of their food, and
to watch the progress of their development. We can learn
how much food such young birds require by feeding them
in confinement.
44 USEFUL BIRDS.
The Amount of Food required by Young Birds.
It seems necessary to the health and comfort of the nest-
ling bird that its stomach be filled with food during most
of the day. Nearly half a century ago Prof. D. Treadwell
called attention to the great
food requirements of the
young Robin. Two young’
birds from the nest were
selected for his experiment.
. a, One soon died of starvation,
c- as the supply of food given
Sey 7 them at first was much too
Dp small. The food of the re-
SS ee maining bird was gradually
Fig. 21.— A young Woodcock, ready to jncreased from day to day,
leave the nest. $ :
until on the seventh day it
was given thirty-one angleworms; but there was no increase
in its weight until, on the fourteenth day, it received sixty-
eight worms, weighing, all told, thirty-four pennyweights.!
Later the same bird ate
nearly one-half its own
weight of beef in a day.
A young man eating at
this rate would consume
about seventy pounds of
beefsteak daily. The
Robin even when full
grown required one-third
of its weight of beef
daily.
Mr. Charles W. Nash fed a young Robin from fifty to
seventy cutworms and earthworms a day for fifteen days.
While experimenting to see how many cutworms the bird
would eat in a day, he fed it five and one-half ounces of this
food, or one hundred and sixty-five cutworms. As the
Robin weighed but three ounces in the morning, it must
We ae,
Fig. 22.— Young Robins, in the nest.
* The Food of Young Robins, by D. Treadwell. Proceedings of the Boston
Society of Natural History, Vol. VI, pp. 396-399.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 45
have eaten, during the day, a quantity one and five-sixths
times its own weight.!
Three young Robins, about ten days old, fed by their
parents, were watched by Weed and Dearborn. By an in-
genious method of weighing and calculating, the observers
arrived at the conclusion that apparently there was eaten a
daily amount equal to more than half the birds’ own weight.?
Mr. Daniel E. Owen kept a young Hermit Thrush, which
ate regularly half its weight of raw steak daily, and would,
he says, probably have eaten as much more had it been fed
oftener.?
In 1895 two young Crows were kept and fed by Messrs.
A. H. Kirkland and H. A. Ballou, then my assistants, from
August 7 to September 2, when one bird was killed by
accident. The survivor was kept until September 14, when
it was killed to determine some points regarding digestion.
These birds were confined in a large cage or enclosure in an
insectary, and were also allowed access during the day to
an enclosed yard, which they reached through the window.
This gave them considerable exercise.
A careful record was kept of most of their food. Never-
theless, they occasionally picked up some sprouted grain in
the yard, and probably a few insects that could not be re-
corded or weighed. For this reason the quantity of the daily
food supply recorded is probably, on the average, too low,
or, in other words, on the safe side. Some of the smaller
animals fed to the birds (toads, frogs, and salamanders) were
not always weighed, but they were measured and could be
compared with others of known weight, so that the weight
was approximated closely.
The birds were well grown when they were first received ;
but the amount of food at first given them probably was not
sufficient for their needs, as their weight did not increase,
although they were fed a variety of both vegetal and animal
1 Birds of Ontario in their Relation to Agriculture, by Charles W. Nash.
Toronto, Department of Agriculture, 1898, p. 22.
? Birds in their Relations to Man, by Clarence M. Weed and Ned Dearborn,
1903, p. 65.
3 Notes on a Captive Hermit Thrush, by Daniel E. Owen. The Auk, Vol.
XIV, No. 1, January, 1897, pp. 1-8.
46 USEFUL BIRDS.
food. They were designated by number. On August 20
No. 1 weighed seventeen ounces and No. 2 fourteen ounces.
That day the two birds had two ounces of tomato, five ounces
of sweet corn, fifty grasshoppers (about three-fourths of an
ounce), —in all, nearly eight ounces, —and they also had free
access to some grain in the yard. As their weight remained
the same, they were fed the next day one-half ounce of
tomato, one ounce of corn, one ounce of muskmelon, five
ounces of meat, one ounce of beets, and fifty grasshoppers,
—in all, fully nine ounces. An apple also was eaten to
some extent, and there was still some grain in the yard.
Nevertheless, each bird lost about an ounce in weight that
day.
They were fed at about the same rate the following day,
and, as they were losing weight, they were given on the
23d two ounces of melon, all the grasshoppers that could be
collected near their place of confinement, four frogs, a sala-
mander, two ounces of tomato, and five ounces of corn. On
this diet the Crows regained some of the weight they had
lost, weighing the next morning sixteen and one-half and
thirteen and one-half ounces respectively. On the 24th they
were fed more than twelve ounces, and the larger bird lost
half an ounce and the smaller gained about the same weight.
On the 25th they received over seventeen ounces of food,
the smaller bird gaining another half ounce and the larger
bird remaining the same. No. 1 now weighed sixteen ounces
and No. 2 fourteen and one-half ounces. The next day,
with twelve ounces of food, the smaller bird lost one-half
ounce and the larger bird made no gain. Evidently where
any gain was made by one bird on this amount of food the
bird either got more than its share, or found some food in
the yard.
On August 28 nearly twenty-seven ounces of food were
given. This was all vegetal matter except thirty grass-
hoppers (one-third of an ounce). J¢ was all eaten, and
apparently all needed, for neither bird increased in weight,
No. 1 losing half an ounce. It seemed evident throughout
the experiment that the birds required much animal food,
and when vegetal food alone was given, a larger amount
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 47
than usual was needed. The next day about twenty ounces
of food, containing a large proportion of animal matter, were
given; and on August 30 the larger bird had again regained
its weight of seventeen ounces, while the other held its own.
So far the experiment seemed to show that when they were
fed from twenty to twenty-five ounces of a ration containing
both animal and vegetable food the birds held their own or
gained slightly ; but if fed less than twenty ounces of this
ration, one or both of the birds fell off in weight.
After the death of one bird the other and all its food were
weighed daily. All opportunity to secure scattered grain or
other food than that weighed was denied. The greatest
weight reached by this bird was eighteen and one-half ounces
on September 13, on which date it was fed as much corn,
cucumber, and tomato as it cared to eat, also a frog, two
toads, twenty-seven grasshoppers, thirty-one borers, eight
beetles, and eighteen crickets. The record of the twelve
days during which this bird was alone seems to show that
less than eight ounces of food daily was hardly sufficient for
its needs, as on a less amount it tended to lose in weight,
while when the amount was increased to ten ounces or more
the tendency toward a daily gain in weight was marked.
When the quantity of food given these birds was largely
reduced in any one day, there was a corresponding reduction
in their weight. On September 13 the larger Crow was given
only two ounces of tomato, fifty-six grasshoppers, twelve
crickets, and a little grain,—in all, not much over three
ounces of food. The next morning it had lost one and
one-half ounces in weight. The fact that a bird, while in
confinement and without a great amount of exercise, could
lose nearly ten per cent. of its weight in a single day, even
when fed a quantity of food equal to about one-sixth its
weight, shows how dependent birds are upon their supply
of food.
If this single experiment can be regarded as conclusive,
we may assume that young Crows, when fledged, absolutely
require a daily amount of food equal to about one-half their
own weight; and it is evident that they will consume much
more than this to their own advantage if they can get it. It
48 USEFUL BIRDS.
seems quite probable that a young bird at liberty, depend-
ing largely on its own exertions to procure food, and thus
exercising more than in confinement, would require still
more food to repair the consequent extra waste of the
tissues.
Others have made similar experiments with Crows in con-
finement. Samuels says that he has kept specimens in cap-
tivity, and has proved by observation that at least eight
ounces of such food as frogs, fish, etc.; are eaten daily by
our common Crow. He says that a Crow can live on a very
limited allowance, but believes eight ounces to be a reasonable
amount. He leaves us to infer that he is speaking of adult
Crows, which undoubtedly require less food than their grow-
ing young.!
Weed and Dearborn kept a wounded adult Crow in a small
box, twelve by thirteen by twenty inches. In these cramped
quarters, where the bird could hardly stretch its wings, it
ate fish for three days in succession at the rate of four and
eighty-three hundredths ounces per day,—more than a
quarter of its own weight, or about half what our young
Crows ordinarily required.”
Probably the amount of food eaten by this captive bears
about the same proportion to the quantity eaten by a vigor-
ous Crow at liberty that the food taken by a prisoner in
solitary confinement, or that consumed by a sedentary clerk,
bears to the amount required by a strong man at hard labor,
or by a prize-fighter in training.
The amount of food taken by young birds could not be
disposed of by such limited powers of digestion as are given
to other animals. What a wonderful contrast is presented
between the quantity of food required by the hot-blooded,
quick-pulsing, active bird, and that needed by the cold-
blooded vertebrates. Many reptiles can live for months
without food. Even some of the mammals do not eat at
all during their hibernation.
1 Birds of New England, by Edward A. Samuels, 1870, p. 359.
2 Birds in their Relations to Man, by Clarence M. Weed and Ned Dearborn,
1903, p. 61.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 49
The Time required for Assimilation of Food.
If we assume that the stomach and cesophagus of a young
Crow can contain but an ounce of food, then the bird would
be required to digest from eight to twelve meals a day,
according to its appetite and opportunity. The question at
once arises, How can any digestive system complete such a
task? Experiments were made with our young Crows to
determine the time required for
digestion. The birds were kept
without food until the stomach
and intestines were empty.
They were then fed insects’ eggs,
in the belief that some parts of
the shells would escape the grind-
ing processes of the stomach and
be voided in the excreta. Sub-
sequent occurrences justified this
belief. Ten experiments of this
kind were made with the two
birds. Fig. 23.— Young Crows, well
From the time when the birds nee
began to feed until the time when the first eggshells were
dropped in the excreta there elapsed, on the average, one
hour, twenty-nine minutes and forty-five seconds. The
shortest time was forty-eight minutes, and the longest one
hour and fifty-four minutes. This, it should be noted, was
not merely the time that the food remained in the stomach,
but the full interval occupied in digesting and assimilating
it, for within this period at least a part of the food had
passed the entire digestive tract.
In most cases all evidence of the food used in the experi-
ment had disappeared from the excreta in from tio to two
and one-half hours. If we contrast this with the slower
digestion of man, we shall see how birds readily dispose of
more meals each day than a man is capable of digesting. To
learn how long food remains in a Crow’s stomach, it would be
necessary to kill a large number of Crows, each being killed
at a longer or shorter interval after it had filled its empty
50 USEFUL BIRDS.
stomach. I am not aware that this has ever been done, but
have no doubt that the majority of the farmers of Massachu-
setts would not object to the destruction of a considerable
number of young Crows for this purpose, or any other.
The Crow which was accidentally killed had fed freely
upon grasshoppers for twenty minutes, and died ten minutes
after the close of the feeding period. An examination of
the alimentary canal showed the stomach to be quite full,
but less than fifty per cent. of its contents, consisting mainly
of the hard parts of wings, thoraces, and legs, was in a con-
dition to be recognized. The strongly chitinized pronota
and hind femora of the grasshoppers offered the most resist-
ance to the digestive processes. The other fifty per cent.
of the stomach contents had been so finely divided, in the
very brief time that it had been in that receptacle, that one
would hardly have cared to express a positive opinion as
to its identity. This condition of stomach contents is not
unusual. In examining the contents of birds’ stomachs we
often find more than fifty per cent. of the food so finely
comminuted and mixed as to be practically unrecognizable.
The presence of insects in a bird’s stomach is sometimes made
known by a mere mandible or some other recognizable por-
tion, which has resisted for a time the grinding of this remark-
able digestive organ. It is significant, however, that, in the
thirty minutes intervening between the beginning of a feeding
period and death, the stomach had thoroughly pulverized
half the food eaten.
This experiment was carried further with the second Crow.
On September 14 the only food materials given the bird were
six crickets and eleven grasshoppers. These it ate within
four minutes, and thirty minutes later it was killed.
Only about twenty-five per cent. of the stomach contents
was recognizable, but this is not all. The alimentary canal
was thirty-six inches in length, and in the intestine at a
distance of from twelve to fifteen inches from the stomach,
and again at twenty-five to twenty-eight inches from that
organ, were found a few small pieces of the fore wings of the
grasshoppers. As the bird had not been fed since 4 o’clock
in the afternoon of the previous day, these remains probably
(Photograph by
eyed Vireo feeding Young.
PLATE IV.— Red-
A. Reed.)
C
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 51
came from the insects fed to it not more than thirty-three
minutes before it was killed.
In summing up the results, Mr. Kirkland says: “I think,
from what we have seen, that we might expect to find the
gizzard empty in from one to one and one-half hours.”
Such an experiment should be carried further, but enough
was learned to show that the stomach of a young Crow prob-
ably can be filled with food and emptied of the digested
material from eight to twelve times a day during the long
days of midsummer, when their appetites are at their best.
Digestion in some of the smaller birds is doubtless even
more rapid, for they are enabled to dispose of a still larger
amount of food in proportion to their size. Mr. Owen in-
forms us that the time required for a blueberry to traverse
the digestive tract of his Hermit Thrush was practically an
hour and a half. Mr. C. J. Maynard once told me that in
a similar experiment a Cedar Bird passed the residue of food
within thirty minutes after the food was taken. Weed and
Dearborn found that a blackberry was digested by a young
Cedar Bird in half an hour.
The Number of Insects eaten by Young Birds in the Nest.
The remarkable appetites of young birds keep their de-
voted parents very busy supplying food most of the time
from morning till night. The mother bird spends practically
all her time either in searching for food, brooding, protect-
ing, and feeding the young, or cleaning the nest (for all the
smaller birds that nest openly are obliged to dispose of the
excreta of their young, that it may neither befoul the nest
nor betray its location to their enemies). Most of the visits
made by the old birds to the nest during the day are for the
dual purpose of feeding the young and keeping the nest
clean. Records kept of the number of these visits show
the industry of the parent birds and the food capacity of
the young.
My assistant, Mr. F. H. Mosher, watched a pair of Red-
eyed Vireos feeding their young on June 13, 1899. There
were three nestlings, about one day old. At this early age
the young of most small birds are fed mainly by regur-
52 USEFUL BIRDS.
gitation. The parent birds swallow the food, and probably
soften or partly digest it, ejecting it afterwards through their
own mouths into the open mouths of the young. No attempt
was made, therefore, in this case, to determine the character
or amount of the food, for fear of disturbing the parents and
interrupting the regularity of the feeding. The birds were
fed between 7 and 8 a.m. four-
teen times; between 8 and 9,
nine times; between 9 and 10,
twelve times; between 10 and
11, seven times; between 11
and 12, sixteen times; between
12 and 1, nine times; between 1
and 2, twelve times; between
2 and 3, fifteen times; between
3 and 4, thirteen times ; and be-
tween 4 and 5, eighteen times.
It will be seen that one or
the other parent came to the
nest with food one hundred and
Fig. 24.— Passenger Pigeon feeding twenty-five times in ten hours,
by regurgitation. From Samuels. even when the observer was
watching near by; but this leaves four hours unaccounted
for, to fill out the long June day, from dawn to evening.
The feeding periods averaged less than six minutes apart dur-
ing the time the birds were watched; so it seems probable
that, had the entire record for the day been kept, at least
one hundred and fifty visits to the young would have been
recorded. Young birds are fed oftenest at morning and even-
ing, or during the hours when these Vireos were not watched.
Mr. Mosher watched a pair of Rose-breasted Grosbeaks
feeding their young on June 12, 1899. The young were
nearly ready to leave the nest, as one of them stood on a
branch near its edge. The nest was situated about fifteen
feet from the ground, in the top of a slender white birch in
the woods. The ground was well covered with hazel bushes
about three and one-half feet high, which nearly concealed
the observer. During the first half hour he made no record,
as the birds were alarmed by his presence. As they com-
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 53
menced bringing food regularly, he began the record at 6
A.M. Between 6 and 7 they came to the nest fifty-two times ;
between 7 and 8, forty-seven times ; between 8 and 9, forty-
three times; between 9 and 10, thirty times; between 10
and 11, thirty-six times; between 11 and 12, twenty-seven
times ; between 12 and 1, thirty-two times; between 1 and
2, thirty-eight times; between 2 and 3, forty-one times;
between 3 and 4, twenty-two times; between 4 and 5, fifty-
eight times. The majority of the larve seemed to be leaf
rollers from the oak trees. The female came on the average
about three times to each two visits of the male; he was
occupied much of the time in keeping other birds away from
the vicinity of the nest.
When the young of most insect-eating birds are well grown,
the parents feed them whole insects just as they are picked
up. With a glass, therefore, the insects brought by these
Grosbeaks could be seen in the birds’ beaks. Their lusty
youngsters were fed almost entirely on insect larve or cater-
pillars taken from the forest trees. On only four visits did
either parent bird bring less than.two larve each. In eleven
hours, then, they made four hundred and twenty-six trips,
and must have fed their nestlings at least eight hundred and
forty-eight larvee or caterpillars, and possibly more, as a bird
has been observed to carry as many as eleven small cater-
pillars on one visit to its young.
In comparing the records of the two nests as given above,
it is noticeable that the Grosbeaks fed the young much oftener
than did the Vireos. This difference is due mainly to the
fact that about the time the young birds are ready to fly,
as were these Grosbeaks, they require much more food than
when first hatched, as was the case with the Vireos. This,
of course, is mainly owing to their increased size. The dif-
ference in the number, age, and size of the young probably
accounts largely for the great variation in the number of
visits made to them by the parent birds, as recorded by dif-
ferent observers.
I have published some notes on the feeding of young
Chickadees by the parent birds. Six visits were made to
these young within thirteen minutes. In each case the bills
4 USEFUL BIRDS.
of the parent birds were filled with a mass of small insects,
mainly ants and plant lice, to which were added a few spiders.
These young were also fully fledged.?
The number of young in the nests of the smaller perch-
ing birds is usually from three to five. In the case of the
Chickadees mentioned above there were seven, and in another
case that I have recently observed there were nine. Chick-
adees and Wrens, because of their insectivorous habits and
the large broods they rear, probably reach the maximum in
the number of insects brought to their young.
Dr. Judd gives an account of the feeding of some young
House Wrens by the mother bird alone. These young Wrens
were about three-fourths grown, and were visited one hun-
dred and ten times in four hours and thirty-seven minutes.
They were fed, during this time, one hundred and eleven
insects and spiders. Among these were identified one white
grub, one soldier bug, three millers (Noctuide), nine spiders,
nine grasshoppers, fifteen May flies, and thirty-four cater-
pillars. On the following day, in three hours and five min-
utes, the young were fed sixty-seven times.?
Professor Aughey states that during a locust year in
Nebraska he saw a pair of Long-billed Marsh Wrens take
thirty-one small locusts to their nest inan hour. It is inter-
esting to note that a pair of Rock Wrens that he watched
took just thirty-two locusts to their nest in another hour.’
Another observer is reported by Dr. Barton to have seen
a pair of Wrens coming from their box and returning with
insects from forty to sixty times an hour. In an exceptional
hour they carried food seventy-one times. He estimates
that at that time they took from the garden six hundred
insects per day.4 *
Few people, unfortunately, who are qualified for the task,
1 Two Years with the Birds on a Farm. Annual report of the Massachusetts
State Board of Agriculture, 1902, p. 129.
2 The Birds of a Maryland Farm, by Sylvester D. Judd. Bulletin No. 17,
United States Department of Agriculture, Division of Biological Survey,
pp. 45, 46.
3 Notes on the Nature of the Food of Nebraska Birds, by S. A. Aughey. First
Report of the United States Entomological Commission, 1877, Appendix, p. 18.
4 Fragments of the Natural History of Pennsylvania, by Dr. B. 8S. Barton,
Part I, 1799, p. 22.
j eT
Big
PLATE V.—Chickadee. Female, with mass of insects in her
beak, entering nesting box at author’s window. (From Ameri-
can Ornithology.) :
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 55
have both the time and patience to watch the feeding of young
birds for an entire day. Dr. C. M. Weed and Mr. W. F.
Fiske, however, have accomplished this feat. They watched
the nest of a Chipping Sparrow from 3.40 a.m. to 7.49 P.M.
on June 22,1898. The valuable record of these observations
Fig. 25.—Chipping Sparrow feeding young.
shows that these two birds, having only three young in the
nest, visited it at least one hundred and eighty-two times
during that day; and Dr. Weed says that they made almost
two hundred trips, although some of the trips evidently were
made to furnish grit for grinding the food. The birds were
busy from daylight to dark, with no long intermission. The
food, so far as identified, consisted largely of caterpillars.
Crickets and crane flies were seen, and it was believed that
a great variety of insect food was brought. !
A committee on useful birds, selected from the Pennsyl-
vania State Board of Agriculture, reported that an observer
had watched the nest of a pair of Martins for sixteen hours,
from 4 a.m. until 8 p.m., to see how many visits the parent
birds made to the young. One hundred and nineteen visits
were made by the male and one hundred and ninety-three by
the female.? _
1 The Feeding Habits of the Chipping Sparrow, by C.M. Weed. Bulletin
No. 55, New Hampshire College Agricultural Experiment Station, 1898.
2 C. C. Musselman, in Agriculture of Pennsylvania, 1887, p. 105.
Or
cor)
USEFUL BIRDS.
The number of insects consumed daily by young birds in
their nests is difficult of estimation, because of the variation
in size among insects and the great difference in size between
the mature insect and the newly hatched larva. Five hun-
dred of the young larve of a moth might occupy less space
in the stomach of a bird than would the moth itself; while a
thousand aphids might take no more room than a full-grown
caterpillar. Nevertheless, many estimates have been made,
based on known data, as to the number of insects fed to
young birds.
The introduced House Sparrow (Passer domesticus), com-
monly called the English Sparrow, undoubtedly eats fewer
insects, here, in proportion to the rest of its food than any of
our smaller native birds. The young are fed very largely on
grain and other non-insectivorous food. Still, a Sparrow’s |
nest in the city of Paris is said to have contained seven hun-
dred pairs of chafer wing-cases.1
Mons. P. Pélicot gives a table of the estimates, made by
several foreign authors, of the numbers of insects eaten by
Sparrows in a given time. These approximations vary from
that of Blatin, who estimates that two Sparrows will destroy
twelve hundred chafers in twelve days, to that of Tschudi,
who believes that a single Sparrow will destroy fifteen hun-
dred larvee within twenty-four hours.?
Bradley mentions watching a bird’s nest and discovering
that five hundred caterpillars were consumed in one day.®
He says (according to Samuels) that a pair of Sparrows
will destroy thirty-three hundred and sixty caterpillars for
a week’s family supplies. A single pair of Sparrows is
reported to have carried to the nest five hundred insects in
an hour.
These statements may be exaggerated, but if they approx-
imate the facts, what immense numbers of insects must be
1 Notes on Recent Progress of Agricultural Science, by David A. Wells. Re-
port (on Agriculture) of the United States Commissioner of Patents, 1861, p. 323.
2 A Favorable View of the English Sparrow, a Review of ‘“‘Un Passereau
a Protéger,”’ Insect Life, Riley and Howard, Vol. IV, 1891, p. 153, published by
the United States Department of Agriculture.
5 Birds and Bird Laws, by J. R. Dodge. Annual Report of the United States
Commissioner of Agriculture, 1864, pp. 436, 437.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. a7
consumed by the young of native Massachusetts birds that
are fed almost entirely upon insect food.
Weed and Dearborn watched three young Cedar Birds in
the nest for the fifteen days they remained there, and found
that they each devoured not less than ten ounces of food in
that time, or more than ten times their weight on the day
they left the nest. .
The Amount of Food eaten by Adult Birds.
There is no way of determining how much food is required
daily by the adult bird, except it be kept in confinement ; in
that case, the food taken can be weighed or measured. This
has been done. Dr. Stanley mentions sixteen Canaries which
ate one hundred grains of food per day, or an amount equal
to about one-sixth of their weight, which is probably much
less than wild birds of the same species would eat.1 Seed-
eating birds, like the Canary, however, require less food
than the insectivorous species, as their food is more con-
centrated. Mr. Robert Ridgway, the distinguished ornithol-
ogist of the Smithsonian Institution, makes the statement in
the American Naturalist for August, 1869, that a Western
Kingbird (Tyrannus verticalis), which he kept in a cage,
devoured one hundred and twenty locusts in a single day.
Compared with the wild bird, the specimen that is caged
or confined is a poor, weak thing at best, short of breath,
low in vitality, and lacking the vigorous assimilative powers
of the free bird. Keepers of cage birds, who know well
the capacity of their pets, find it difficult to believe that
wild birds can possibly consume the amount of food that
actually has been found in their stomachs by economic
ornithologists.
When the reader is told that thirty grasshoppers were found
in the stomach of a single Catbird, he conjures up a mental
photograph of the full-grown grasshopper (the imago) that
he sees in the field in late summer, and fails to remember,
perhaps, that grasshoppers come from eggs, and in their
growth to maturity may be found of all sizes, between that
of the newly hatched insect and the full-winged hopper.
’ History of Birds, p. 225.
58 USEFUL BIRDS. e
While the Catbird’s stomach might not be large enough to
contain thirty full-grown locusts, it would easily contain more
than thirty small ones. The statement that thirty grasshop-
pers were found in the Catbird’s stomach might also need
modification in another way. The least fragment of an in-
sect found in a bird’s stomach is usually considered good
proof that the bird has eaten that insect. There might be
found in the stomach of a bird a mass of unrecognizable
material, from which the expert would be able to sort out
and recognize enough of the harder parts of different grass-
hoppers to prove that thirty of these insects, of consider-
able size, had been eaten within a certain time, even though
a greater part of those first swallowed had already disap-
peared from the stomach.
Prof. F. E. L. Beal writes me as follows regarding the
methods used at the United States Department of Agri-
culture in counting the insects*found in the stomachs of
birds : —
In the case of grasshoppers and caterpillars it is the jaws (mandi-
bles) that are counted. Birds when not sleeping appear to eat all the
time when not occupied in other duties, such as nest-making or feeding
their young. The process of digestion is continuous. The more easily
digested parts pass out of the stomach very quickly, but the hard parts
remain somewhat longer. In this way when a bird is feeding upon
grasshoppers the jaws of those first eaten remain after the rest of
the body has passed on. When the stomach is opened the jaws are
counted, and for every two we estimate at least one grasshopper killed.
In cases where only a few insects were involved I have taken the pains
to pair the jaws, and in this way have often found that the number that
had been eaten was more than half the number of jaws. In this work
each head that appears to be whole is carefully examined, to see that it
has not lost one or more of its jaws; were it not for this precaution,
the insect might be counted twice. Caterpillars, like grasshoppers,
are easily broken up, and so the heads are counted when whole; other-
wise the jaws are counted.
The variation in size of different species of insects should
also be considered. While the caterpillars of some species
of moths reach three or four inches in length, others never
grow to be half an inch long.
These and other similar considerations, well known to
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 59
the economic ornithologist, lead him to accept as facts the
extreme statements made by competent investigators.
It will be seen from the foregoing explanations that, while
a large number of injurious insects found in a bird’s stom-
ach may indicate its usefulness, it may not always mean that
it has eaten a great bulk or quantity of such food.
The question which most interests the farmer, however,
is, not so much what birds require to sustain life, as how
much they will eat if they can get their fill. If in times of
plenty birds will eat more than they really need, then they
become more useful or injurious, as the case may be, than
they would be if they ate only, enough to live. The amount
of food that has been found in birds’ gizzards indicates that
they will eat until surfeited.
Professor Beal, who has examined the contents of over
twenty thousand stomachs, says, regarding this habit :—
The majority of people have no idea of how much these insects can
be compressed in the stomach of a bird. -It is often the case that when
a stomach has been opened, and the contents placed in a pile, the heap
is two or three times as large as the original stomach with the food all
in it. Moreover, in the cases where remarkable numbers of insects
have been found, the crops or gullets usually have been full, as well as
the stomach itself. It is a fact, perhaps not generally known, that with
birds that have no special enlargement of the gullet in the nature of a
crop, the whole gullet is used for the purpose; and when favorite food
is abundant, the bird will fill itself to the throat. I have seen a Snow-
bird so full of seeds that they were plainly in sight when the beak was
opened, and from the bill to the stomach was a solid mass of seed.
The stomachs of birds are often packed so hard and tight with food
that it is a wonder how the process of digestion can go on; but it does,
nevertheless.
In giving the maximum amounts of food found in birds’
stomachs, I shall be obliged to refer to the publications of
the Bureau of Biological Survey of the United States De-
partment of Agriculture; and it is but just to say here
that the world owes much to Dr. Merriam, chief of the
Bureau, for his indefatigable labors in behalf of science and
agriculture.
In connection with the work of the survey, the contents
of more than thirty-five thousand bird stomachs have been
60 USEFUL BIRDS.
examined, and much has been done in observing the feed-
ing habits of birds in the field. The work in economic orni-
thology performed by Merriam, Fisher, Barrows, Beal, and
Judd is of great value. Its results rank above those of
all other similar investigations, and must be considered as
authoritative.
Professor Beal found in the stomach of a Yellow-billed
Cuckoo two hundred and seventeen fall webworms, and in
another two hundred and fifty American tent caterpillars.
Two Flickers were found to have eaten respectively three
thousand and five thousand ants. Sixty grasshoppers were
found in the stomach of a Nighthawk.
Professor Harvey found five hundred mosquitoes in a
Nighthawk’s stomach. In this case the insects must have
been fully grown, as the larve of the mosquito are found
mainly in water, and the Nighthawk takes its food on the
wing. The stomach of this useful bird is much larger in pro-
portion to its size than that of most other birds; but sev-
enty-five hundred seeds of the yellow wood sorrel had been
eaten by a Mourning Dove, sixty-four hundred by another,
and ninety-two hundred seeds, chiefly of weeds, were found
in another. Here we have twenty-three thousand one hun-
dred seeds, mostly those of weeds, eaten at a meal by three
birds. Probably where these Jarge numbers are given, the
result is approximate, and is arrived at by counting a part
of the contents for a measure, and from this estimating the
rest in bulk.
Dr. Judd says that the stomachs of four Bank Swallows
contained, all together, just two hundred ants, and that a
Nighthawk has been known to eat one thousand at a single
meal. He speaks of seventeen hundred seeds of weeds hav-
ing been taken at one feeding by a Bob-white; three thou-
sand leguminous seeds were found in the stomach of another,
and no less than five thousand seeds of pigeon grass were
taken from a third. Dr. Warren has taken twenty-eight
cutworms from the stomach of a Red-winged Blackbird.
Stomachs of Snowflakes have each contained from five
hundred to fifteen hundred seeds of amaranth. Professor
Forbes found in the stomachs of seven Cedar Birds a number
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 61
of cankerworms varying from seventy to one hundred and
one each, the number found in most cases averaging nearly
one hundred for each bird.
A Ruffed Grouse, killed in winter, had in its crop twelve
leaves of sheep laurel and four hundred and thirty-five buds
and bits of branches, all taken for its morning meal. The
crop of another contained over five hundred buds and twigs.
As these birds eat such food both at morning and at night, it
would seem that they must require daily, for these two meals
alone, between eight hundred and one thousand buds and
twigs.
The following notes, received from Professor Beal since
the above was written, are of great interest : —
,
From the stomach of a Franklin's Gull (Larus franklinit) there were
taken seventy entire grasshoppers and the jaws of fifty-six more; from
another, ninety grasshoppers and one hundred and two additional jaws ;
from another, forty-eight grasshoppers and seventy more jaws ; and still
another contained sixty-seven grasshoppers. Another stomach of this
species contained sixty-eight crickets. These grasshoppers and crickets
were each more than one inch in length. We examined the stomach
of a Franklin’s Gull which contained three hundred and twenty-seven
entire nymphs of dragon flies, each three-fourths of an inch in length.
In the stomach of a Cliff Swallow were found one hundred entire
beetles (Aphodius inquinatus), with remains of others. These insects
are a little more than three-eighths of an inch in length. We are now
examining birds’ stomachs from Texas, and from the stomach of a Yel-
low-billed Cuckoo were taken the remains of eighty-two caterpillars
that originally were from one to one and a half inches in length. From
another stomach were taken eighty-six, and from forty to sixty from
several others.
All evidence acquired by observation as to the amount of
food eaten by wild birds at liberty must perforce be frag-
mentary, for such observation is necessarily limited to brief
periods. The difficulties attending such work make its re-
sults somewhat uncertain and unsatisfactory ; nevertheless,
some information as to the quantity of food eaten by wild
birds may be obtained in this way. Vultures are said to so
gorge themselves that they are unable to fly. Ihave known
+ Birds in their Relation to Man, ly Clarence M. Weed and Ned Dearborn,
1903, p. 62.
62 USEFUL BIRDS.
a Goshawk in winter to kill a domestic Cock of more than
its own weight, and devour the greater part at two meals.
T have learned, by following certain Warblers and Titmice
through the woods, that their search for and consumption of
insects are almost continuous during most of the forenoon.
As the noon hour approaches they become less active, and
on warm days devote some tine to resting and bathing. In
the afternoon their activity increases, until toward night
their quest for food is almost as strenuous as in the early
morning. They are, therefore, actually engaged for the
larger part of the day in capturing and eating insects. In
feeding wild birds in winter I have noticed that Chickadees
come to the food supplied for them about three times an hour
all day long, and that in the intervals they are mainly occu-
pied in finding their natural food. On May 28, 1898, Mr.
Mosher watched a pair of Northern Yellow-throats eating
_plant lice from the birches in the Middlesex Fells Reserva-
tion, where these insects swarmed. He was equipped with
a good glass, and concealed close to the spot where the birds
were feeding, and so was able to count in turn the number
of times each bird picked up an insect. One of these War-
blers apparently swallowed eighty-nine of these tiny insects
in one minute. The pair continued eating at this rate for
forty minutes. Mr. Mosher states that they must have eaten
considerably over seven thousand plant lice in that time. It
would seem impossible for the birds to crowd that number
of insects into their stomachs ; but we must remember that
the insects were infinitesimal in size, soft-bodied, easily com-
pressed in the stomach, and quickly digested, so that by the
time a part were eaten those first taken would be well dis-
posed of, leaving room for more. Mr. Mosher is a very
careful, painstaking, and trustworthy observer ; undoubtedly
his statement is accurate; but, to eliminate any possibility
of error, we will assume for purposes of calculation that
they ate only thirty-five hundred in an hour.
A pair of Yellow-throats (presumably the same) were seen
to come daily and many times each day to the birch trees
which were infested with these aphids. Probably they spent
at least three hours each day feeding on these insects. If
VALUE OF BIRDS VO MAN. 63
the two birds ate only thirty-five hundred an hour for three
hours a day, they would consume ten thousand five hundred
aphids each day, or seventy-three thousand five hundred in
a week. It requires no
draft on the imagination
to see how such appe-
tites may become useful
to the farmer if they are
satiated on his insect
enemies.
Two Scarlet Tanagers
were seen eating very
small caterpillars of the
gipsy moth for eighteen minutes, at the rate of thirty-five
a minute. These birds spent much time in that way. If
we assume that they ate caterpillars at this rate for only an
hour each day, they must have consumed daily twenty-one
hundred caterpillars, or fourteen thousand seven hundred
in a week. Such a number of caterpillars would be suffi-
cient to defoliate two average apple trees, and so prevent
fruitage. The removal of these caterpillars might enable the
trees to bear a full crop. It is easily possible, therefore,
for a single pair of these birds in a week’s time to save the
fruit of two average apple trees, —a crop worth from two
to five dollars or more, according to the productiveness of
the trees and the price paid for apples.
Fig. 26.— Yellow-throat catching birch aphids.
BIRDS SAVE TREES AND CROPS FROM DESTRUCTION.
Since birds evidently operate to check insect outbreaks, it
follows that in their capacity of insect destroyers they must
in many instances have saved trees and crops from destruc-
tion by insect pests. If, however, we turn to the literature
of agriculture, entomology, and ornithology, we shall not find
it replete with such instances. Still, there are enough on
record to show that conspicuous services of birds have been
noted occasionally ; and I am convinced by my own experi-
ence that such checks to insect increase occur commonly, but
escape both observation and record.
Some brief but striking accounts of this class of occur-
64 USEFUL BIRDS.
rences may be gleaned from European records. Samuels
writes that in Pomerania in 1847 an immense forest that was
in danger of being utterly ruined by caterpillars was very
unexpectedly saved by Cuckoos, which, though on the point
of migrating, established themselves there for some weeks,
and so thoroughly cleared the trees that the next year “neither
depredators nor.depredations were to be seen.”! He also
speaks of a European outbreak of the gipsy moth (Bombyx
dispar) in 1848, saying that the hand of man was powerless
to work off the infliction, but that on the approach of winter
Titmice and Wrens paid daily visits to the infested trees,
and before spring had arrived the eggs of dispar were en-
tirely destroyed. This account agrees with the following
translation from Altum : —
In the year 1848 endless numbers of the larve of Bombyx dispar had
eaten every leaf from the trees of Count Wodzicki, so that they were
perfectly bare. In the fall all the branches and limbs were covered
with the egg clusters. After he had recognized the impracticability of
it, he gave up all endeavor to remove them by hand, and prepared to
see his beautiful trees die. Towards winter numerous flocks of Titmice
and Wrens came daily to the trees. The egg clusters disappeared. In
the spring twenty pairs of Titmice nested in the garden, and the larva
plagtie was noticeably reduced. In the year 1850 the small feathered
garden police had cleaned his trees, so that he saw them during the
entire summer in their most beautiful verdure.?
According to Reaumur, these larve were so extremely
numerous on the limes of the Alle verte at Brussels in 1826
that many of the great trees‘of that noble avenue were nearly.
defoliated. The moths swarmed like bees in the summer.
They were also very numerous in the park, and if one-half
the eggs had hatched in the following spring, probably scarce
a leaf would have remained in these favorite places of public
resort. Two months later, however, he could scarcely dis-
cover a single egg cluster. This happy result was attributed
to the Titmice and Creepers, which were seen busily running
up and down the tree trunks.?
1 Agricultural Value of Birds, by E. A. Samuels. Annual Report of the
Massachusetts State Board of Agriculture, 1865-66, pp. 116, 117.
* Translated from Forstzoologie, II, 1880, p. 324.
® Reau. i387. Cited by Kirby and Spence in their Introduction to Entomology,
1857, pp. 117, 118.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 65
The value of birds has already been recognized at the
antipodes. Australian farmers have suffered greatly from
inroads of locusts upon their crops and pastures.
The Australian correspondence of the Mark Lane Express
of March 7, 1892, had a paragraph relating to the value of
the Ibis to farmers during the locust incursions of that year
and the year previous. In the Glen Thompson district
several largé flocks, one said to number fully five hundred
birds, were seen eating the young locusts in a wholesale
manner. Other insectivorous birds were flourishing upon
the same diet. Near Ballarat, Victoria, a swarm of locusts
was noted in a paddock; and just as it was feared that all
the sheep would have to be sold for want of grass, flocks of
Starlings, Spoonbills, and Cranes made their appearance, and
in a few days made so complete a destruction of the locusts
that only about forty acres of grass were lost.1
American farmers have had many similar experiences.
When the Mormons first settled in Utah their crops were
almost utterly destroyed by myriads of crickets that came
Fig. 2'7.—The western cricket that destroyed the settlers’ crops at Salt Lake,
Natural size; after Glover.
down from the mountains. Hon. Geo. Q. Cannon, as tem-
porary chairman of the third irrigation congress, told how it
happened. The first year’s crop having been destroyed, the
Mormons had sowed seed the second year. The crop prom-
ised well, but when again the crickets appeared, the people
were in danger of starvation. In describing the conditions
in 1848 Mr. Cannon says : —
1 Insect Life, Riley and Howard, 1891-92, Vol. IV, p. 409.
66 USEFUL BIRDS.
Black crickets came down by millions and destroyed our grain
crops; promising fields of wheat in the morning were by evening
as smooth as a man’s hand, —devoured by the crickets. .. At this
juncture sea Gulls came by hundreds and thousands, and before the
crops were entirely destroyed these Gulls devoured the insects, so that
our fields were entirely freed from them... ‘The settlers at Salt
Lake regarded the advent of the birds as a heayen-sent miracle. .
I have been along the ditches in the morning and have seen lumps of
these crickets vomited up by the Gulls, so that they could again begin
killing. «
These “lumps of crickets” were probably pellets com-
posed of indigestible portions of the insects, regurgitated
by the birds. These crickets (Anabrus purpurascens) tray-
Fig. 28.— Gulls saving crops by killing crickets.
elled in enormous hordes, stopping at no obstacle, even
crossing rivers. Several times afterward the crops of the
Mormons were attacked by them, and were saved by the
Gulls.!| Dr. A. K. Fisher is authority for the statement
1 This account of the deliverance of the Mormons by the Gulls is vouched for
by many witnesses. See Irrigation Age, 1894, p. 188; also, Insect Life, Vol. VII,
p. 275; Annual Report of the Massachusetts State Board of Agriculture, 1871, p.
76; Annual Report of the United States Commissioner of Agriculture, 1871, p. 79;
and Second Annual Report of the United States Entomological Commission,
1878-79, p. 166.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 67
that the bird referred to is undoubtedly Franklin’s Gull
(Larus franklinti), which occurs in enormous flocks about
the small fresh-water lakes of the northwest, and feeds in
great companies on Orthoptera of all sorts. The Gulls were
practically canonized by the grateful Mormons, and protected
by both law and public sentiment, as a recognition of their
worth.
Similar services were performed by birds during the great
locust ravages which followed the settlement of the Missis-
sippi valley. When large swarms of locusts appeared, nearly
all birds, from the tiny Kinglet to the great Whooping Crane,
fed on them. Fish-eating birds, like the Great Blue Heron,
flesh-eating birds, like the Hawks and Owls, shore birds,
Ducks, Geese, Gulls, —all joined with the smaller land birds
in the general feast. Prof. Samuel Aughey learned this
by dissecting birds and observing their feeding habits in
Nebraska. In a paper published by him in 1877, but not
often quoted, he gives some of the practical results of the
work done by birds in protecting crops from the mighty
swarms of locusts which were devastating most of that
region. He says: —
In the spring of 1865 the locusts hatched out in countless numbers in
northeastern Nebraska. Very few fields of corn and the cereal grains
escaped some damage. Some fields were entirely destroyed, while
others were hurt to the amount of from ten to,seventy-five per cent.
One field of corn northwest of Dakota City was almost literally covered
with locusts, and there the indications were that not a stalk would
escape. After, and about the time the corn was up, the Yellow-headed
Blackbirds in large numbers made this field their feeding ground.
Visiting the field frequently, I could see a gradual diminution of the
number of the locusts. Other birds, especially the Plovers, helped the
Yellow-heads ; and, although some of the corn had to be replanted once,
yet it was the birds that made the crop that was raised possible at all.
During the same season I visited Pigeon Creek valley, in this county,
and I found among the eaten-up wheat fields one where the damage
done was not over five per cent. ‘The Irishman who pointed it out to me
ascribed it to the work of the birds, chief among which were the Black-
bird and Plover, with a few Quail and Prairie Chickens.
Professor, Aughey speaks of a locality where, on several
old fields, locusts hatched to the number of about three hun-
68 USEFUL BIRDS.
dred to the square foot. Birds soon found them, and the
ground was frequented by Blackbirds, Plover, Curlews,
Prairie Chickens and small land birds. Long before the
middle of June most of the locusts had disappeared. In
1886 locusts, he says, invaded Cedar and Dixon counties in
swarms that darkened the sun. Nevertheless, at one point
under observation the great number of birds that attacked
these insects very materially lessened their numbers. In
1869 more than ninety per cent. of the locusts in one
neighborhood were destroyed, apparently by birds, in one
week. Other experiences are given, and several interesting
letters from farmers are published, one of which follows : —
Dear Sir:—In answer to your question about the birds and the -
locusts, I must say this: every farmer that shoots birds must be a fool.
I had wheat this last spring on new breaking. The grasshoppers came
out apparently as thick as the wheat itself, and indeed much thicker. I
gave up that field for lost. Just then great numbers of Plover came,
and flocks of Blackbirds and some Quail, and commenced feeding on
this field. They cleaned out the locusts so well that I had at least
three-fourths of a crop, and I know that without the birds I would not
have had any. I know other farmers whose wheat was saved in the
same way. S. E. GoopMorE.
FREMONT, NEB.
’ Another farmer wrote that the locusts hatched in immense
numbers in his corn fields, but flocks of Blackbirds came and
destroyed the insects, so that he raised a good crop. In an-
other case, related by State Senator Crawford, a wheat field
was swept clean by the locusts when the wheat was about
two inches high; but flocks of Blackbirds came and de-
voured the locusts, and the wheat sprang up again and made
a-good crop. The members of the United States Entomo-
logical Commission were much impressed with the value of
birds as locust destroyers. They said that the ocular dem-
onstration of the usefulness of birds as insect destroyers was
“so full and complete that it was impossible to entertain any
doubt on this point.” In one instance a farmer took one
of the members of the commission out into the field, to
show him how numerously the young locusts were hatching.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 69
When they arrived, the insects had disappeared from the
place where they had been so abundant in the morning.
The statement by the family that a flock of Blackbirds had
been there during the farmer’s absence solved the mystery.
In another instance a garden was attacked by an innumer-
able host of little locusts. The owner battled bravely with
them for awhile, but at last, giving up in despair, sat down
to watch the destruction of his vegetables and flowers, when
suddenly a flock of Blackbirds alighted on the young cot-
tonwoods he had planted in his yard. Having chirped a
song, as if to cheer him, they flew into the garden; when
they left, an hour or so later, the dreaded “hoppers” were
gone, and his garden was saved.}
A severe outbreak of the forest tent caterpillar (Malaco-
soma disstria) occurred in New York and some of the New
England States in 1897-98. Thousands of acres of wood-
land were devastated, great damage was done to the sugar-
maple orchards of New York and Vermont, and the injury
extended into Massachusetts. Birds and other natural ene-
mies attacked the caterpillars vigorously in many localities,
and by the year 1900 the plague had been reduced so that
the injury was no longer seen. Miss Mary B. Sherman of
Ogdensburg, N. Y., wrote on May 18 of that year that the
town was then full of birds which were feeding on the cater-
pillars. There had been numerous Warblers in the maples,
and the Orioles, Sparrows, Robins, Cedar Birds, several
species of Warblers, and probably the House Wren, were
killing caterpillars. Birds were reported in large numbers
in the county. On May 26 she wrote again, stating that
there were practically no caterpillars left, cold weather hay-
ing killed many, and the birds apparently having destroyed
the remainder.”
The good accomplished by birds in quelling great insect in-
vasions should be patent to all, but very few people realize
what the birds are doing. Many Nebraskans failed to notice
1 First Report of the United States Entomological Commission. Riley, Pack-
ard, and Thomas. 1877, pp. 335, 336, 338-344.
2 Report on the Injurious and Other Insects of the State of New York, by
E, P. Felt, 1900, p. 1019.
70 USEFUL BIRDS.
that birds were feeding on the locusts until Professor Aughey
called their attention to this fact by articles published in the
press.
Birds are doing the same kind of work in Massachusetts
to-day, in repressing smaller outbreaks of common insects.
Had we more observing people to record such services, their
amount and variety probably would astound us. Professor
Beal saw a family of Rose-breasted Grosbeaks clear the potato
beetles from a potato patch of about one-fourth of an acre.
Mr. E. W. Wood of West Newton, a well-known horticultur-
ist, informed me that during one season, when the spring can-
kerworms (Paleacrita vernata) became quite numerous in his
orchard, a pair of Baltimore Orioles appeared, built a nest
near by, and fed daily upon the cankerworms. This they
continued to do assiduously; by the time the young birds
were hatched, the numbers of the worms were considerably
reduced. The birds then redoubled their diligence, carry-
ing ten or eleven worms to the nest at once. Soon the
cankerworms had disappeared, and there has been no trouble
from them for many years.
Instances were recorded during the first State campaign
against the gipsy moth, from 1890 to 1895, where small
isolated moth colonies appeared to have been suppressed
and even annihilated by birds. A serious outbreak was
discovered in Georgetown, Mass., in 1899. It had been in
existence for a long time, but its spread had evidently been
limited by the great number of birds that were feeding there
on all forms of the moth. Several months later the State
abandoned the work against the moth, and little hope was
entertained that anything more than a severe check had been
given the insect in Georgetown. Nevertheless, in the six
years that have since elapsed comparatively few moths have
been found in that locality. The most feasible explanation
of this seems to be that up to 1906 the birds have kept the
numbers of the moths below the point where they can do
appreciable injury.
I have had several opportunities, within the last fifteen
years, to watch the checking of insect uprisings by birds.
One morning in the fall of 1904 I noticed in some poplar
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 71
trees near the shore of the Musketaquid a small flock of
Myrtle and Black-poll Warblers, busily feeding on a swarm
of plant lice. There were not more than fifteen birds. The
insects were mainly imagoes, and some of them were flying.
The birds were pursuing these through the air, but were also
seeking those that remained on the trunks and branches. I
watched these birds
for some time, noted
their activity, and 3
then passed on, but AY ran’
returned and ob- , eof MES) if
served their move- , ¥
ments quite closely
at intervals all day.
Toward night some
of the insects had
scattered to neigh-
boring trees, and a
few of the birds
were pursuing them
there; but most of
the latter remained
at or about the place
where the aphis
swarm was first seen, and they were still there at sundown.
The swarm decreased rapidly all day, unti] just before sunset
it was difficult to find even a few specimens of the insect.
The birds remained until it was nearly dark, for they were
still finding a few insects on the higher branches. The plant
lice I had secured for identification were destroyed or lib-
erated during the night, probably by a deer mouse which
frequented the camp ; so the next morning at sunrise I went -
to the trees to look for more specimens. The birds, how-
ever, were there before mc, and I was unable to find a single
aphis on the trees. The last bird to linger was more suc-
cessful than I, for it was still finding a few ; but it soon gave
up the effort, and left for more fruitful fields. Probably a
few insects escaped by flight; but in examining the locality
in 1905 I could not find one. The apparently complete
Ate
A ei ae
: a Sen Ny
Fig. 29.— Warblers destroying a swarm of plant lice.
72 USEFUL BIRDS.
destruction of these insects may have been due in part to
the hard winter that ensued, but the effect produced by the
birds was most obvious.
Such instances of the quelling of insect outbreaks by birds
are noticeable, but the regulative influence steadily and
perennially exerted by them, which tends to keep hundreds
of species of injurious insects below the point where their
injury to trees and plants would become apparent, is very
seldom appreciated.
THE INCREASE OF INJURIOUS INSECTS FOLLOWING
THE DESTRUCTION OF BIRDS.
Many cases have been noted where the destruction of birds
has been followed by an immediate increase in the numbers
of injurious insects. Frederick the Great, king of Prussia,
being particularly fond of cherries, was annoyed to see that
the Sparrows were destroying his favorite fruit. An edict
was issued ordering Sparrow extermination. All the re-
sources of the fowler were brought to bear, and the cam-
paign was so successful that not only were the Sparrows
destroyed, but many other birds were either killed or driven
away by the extraordinary measures taken against the Spar-
rows. Within two years cherries and most other fruits were
wanting. The trees were defoliated by caterpillars and other
insects, and the great Frederick, seeing his error, imported
Sparrows at considerable expense to take the place of the
birds that had been killed.?
In the year 1798 the forests in Saxony and Brandenburg
were attacked by a general mortality. The greater part of
the trees, especially the firs and pines, died as if struck at
the roots by some secret malady. The foliage was not de-
voured by caterpillars; the trees perished without showing
any signs of external disease. This calamity became so gen-
eral that the regency of Saxony sent naturalists and skillful
foresters to find out the cause. They soon found it in the
multiplication of one of the lepidopterous insects, which in
its larval state fed within the tree upon the wood. When-
1 Agricultural Value of Birds, by E. A, Samuels. Annual Report of the Mas-
sachusetts State Board of Agriculture, 1865-66, pp. 116, 117.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 73
ever any bough of the fir or the pine was broken this insect
was found within it, and had often hollowed it out even to the
bark. The naturalists reported that apparently the extraor-
dinary increase of the insect was owing to the entire dis-
appearance of several species of Woodpecker and Titmouse,
which had not been seen in the forest for some years.!
In 1858 Kearly wrote to the Entomclogists’ Intelligencer
that a friend who had been spending a short time in Belgium
informed him that in the previous year Sparrows and other
birds had appeared in the park at Brussels in unusual num-
bers. These birds probably were attracted by an unusual
supply of insect food; but complaint was made of the
Sparrows as a nuisance, and their destruction was ordered.
“But,” says Kearly, “it now turns out that in exterminat-
ing the birds the park goers have got rid of one evil only
to entail upon themselves a greater. Throughout the past
summer the place has swarmed with insect pests.” He says
also that the larva of the gipsy moth stripped nearly all of
the trees of their foliage, and was one of the chief offenders.
He adds that, had the authorities known what Kirby and
Spence say on this subject (regarding the destruction of
this insect by birds in Brussels in 1826), they would have
remained guiltless of killing their feathered protectors.
During the year 1861 the harvests of France gave an un-
usually poor return, and a commission to investigate the
cause of the deficiency was appointed at the instance of the
Minister of Agriculture.22 The commission took counsel
of experienced naturalists, St. Hilaire, Prevost, and others.
By this commission the deficiency was attributed in a great
degree to the ravages of insects which it is the function of
certain birds to check.
It seems that the French people had been killing and
eating not merely the game birds, but the smaller birds
as well. Insect-eating birds had been shot, snared, and
trapped throughout the country. Fruit-eating and grain-
eating species especially had been persecuted. Birds’ eggs
1 Utility of Birds, by Wilson Flagg. Annual Report of the Massachusetts
State Board of Agriculture, 1861, pp. 66, 67.
2 Notes on the Progress of Agricultural Science, by David A. Wells. Report
of the United States Commissioner of Patents, 1861, pp. 322, 323.
74 USEFUL BIRDS.
had been taken in immense numbers. A single child had
been known to come in at night with a hundred eggs, and
the number of birds’ eggs destroyed in the country each year
was estimated at eighty to one hundred millions. Before
such persecution the birds were actually dying out. Some
species had already disappeared, and others were rapidly
diminishing. As an apparent result of the destruction of
birds, the vines, the fruit trees, the forest trees, and the
grain in the fields, had suffered much from the attacks of
destructive insects, that had increased as a result of the dis-
turbance of nature’s balance caused by the decrease of birds.
In one department of the east of France the value of the wheat
destroyed by insects in a single season was estimated at five
million francs. It was concluded that by no agency save that
of little birds could the ravages of insects be kept down.
The commission called for prompt and energetic remedies,
and suggested that the teachers and clergy should endeavor
to put the matter in its proper light before the people.
In 1895 I received a letter from Mons. J. O. Clercy,
secretary of the Society of Natural Sciences, Ekaterinburg,
Russian Siberia, in which he stated that the ravages of two
species of cutworms and some ten species of locusts had con-
tributed (together with the want of rain) to produce a famine
in that region. One of the evident causes which permitted
such a numerous propagation of insect pests was, he said,
the almost complete destruction of birds, most of which had
been killed and sent abroad by wagonloads for ladies’ hats.
A law for the protection of birds was then enacted, and, said
M. Clercy, “The poor little creatures are doing their best
to reoccupy their old places in the woods and gardens.” The
reoccupation, however, did not go on as rapidly as did the
destruction.
Mr. R. E. Turner, in an important paper upon insects,
read before an agricultural conference at Mackay, Quecns-
land, stated that he considered that the decrease of insectiv-
orous birds, owing to their indiscriminate shooting by the
Kanakas on the plantations, had a great deal to do with the
1 The Gipsy Moth, by E. H. Forbush and C. H. Femald, p. 206. Published
by the Massachusetts State Board of Agriculture, 1896.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 75
increase of the sugar-cane insects, particularly white grubs,
which were then so abundant.!__A similar effect was observed
by the early settlers of America to follow the shooting of
the birds which attacked their crops. Kalm states, in his
Travels in America, that in 1749, after a great destruction
among the Crows and Blackbirds for a legal reward of three
pence per dozen, the northern States experienced a complete
loss of their grass and grain crops. The colonists were
obliged to import hay from England to feed their cattle.
The greatest losses from the ravages of the Rocky Mountain
locust were coincident with, or followed soon after, the de-
struction by the people of countless thousands of Blackbirds,
Prairie Chickens, Quail, Upland Plover, Curlew, and other
birds. This coincidence seems significant, at least.
Professor Aughey tells how this slaughter was accom-
plished. He says that the Blackbirds and many other birds
decreased greatly in Nebraska in the twelve years previous
to 1877. He first went to the State in 1864. He never saw
the Blackbirds so abundant as they were during 1865 over
eastern Nebraska. Vast numbers of them were poisoned
around the corn fields in spring and fall during the twelve
years, so that often they were gathered and thrown into
piles. This was done in the belief that the Blackbirds were
damaging the crops, especially the corn. Great numbers of
birds of other species were destroyed at the same time. A
single grain of corn soaked with strychnine would suffice to
kill a bird. In one autumn, in Dakota County alone, not
less than thirty thousand birds must have been destroyed in
this way. Regarding this slaughter he wrote : —
Supposing that each of these birds averaged eating one hundred and
fifty insects each day, we then have the enormous number of onc hun-
dred and thirty-five million insects saved in this one county in one
month that ought to have been destroyed through the influence of birds.
When we reflect, further, that many of these birds were migratory, and
that they helped to keep down the increase of insects in distant regions,
the harm that their destruction did is beyond calculation. The killing
of such birds is no local loss; it is a national, a continental loss.?
1 Insect Life, by Riley and Howard. 1894, Vol. VI, No. 4, p. 333.
2 First Report of the United States Entomological Commission. Riley, Pack-
ard, and Thomas. 1877, pp. 348, 344.
76 USEFUL BIRDS.
Professor Aughey gathered statistics regarding the killing
of Quail and Prairie Chickens for the market during this
period, and concluded that in thirty counties the average
yearly slaughter of these birds must have been at least five
thousand Quail and ten thousand Prairie Chickens for each
county, or four hundred and fifty thousand birds in all. We
can only conjecture as to how great was the destruction of
other game birds.
The poisoning of birds in the west permitted an increase
of many other insects besides the locusts. A farmer from
Wisconsin informed me that, the Blackbirds in his vicinity
having been killed off, the white grubs increased in number
and destroyed the grass roots, so that he lost four hundred
dollars in one year from this cause.
THE DESTRUCTION OF INJURIOUS MAMMALS BY BIRDS.
The injury to trees and crops by insects is not the only
evil that has followed the destruction of birds and other
animals by man. Rapacious birds hold a chief place among
the forces which are appointed to hold in check the gnawing
mammals or rodents, which breed rapidly, and, unless kept
within bounds, are very destructive to grass fields, crops, and
trees. The great swarms of lemmings which have appeared
from time to time upon the Scandinavian peninsula are his-
torical. Their migrations, during which they destroy the
grass or grain in their path, until finally they reach the sea
and perish in a vain attempt to cross it, have been recorded
often. A similar increase of rodents may take place any-
where whenever their natural enemies are unduly reduced in
numbers. Such cases are on record in England and Scot-
land. In Stowe’s Chronicle, in 1581, it is stated : —
About Hallontide last past (1580) in the marshes of Danessey Hun-
dred, in a place called South Minster, in the county of Essex, there
sodainlie appeared an infinite number of mice, which overwhelming the
whole earth in the said marshes, did sheare and gnaw the grass by the
rootes, spoyling and tainting the same with their venimous teeth in such
sort, that the cattell which grazed thereon were smitten with a murraine
and died thereof; which vermine by policie of man could not be de-
stroyed, till at the last it came to pass that there flocked together such
PLATE VI.— Field or Meadow Mouse. A prolific and destructive
species, held in check by Hawks and Owls.
PLATE VII.— White-footed or Deer Mouse. &>
en a
i a ole
bw mr =
? Ns
td
. 4 w cies
-_ ee
e¢ 7 @ ™
x
PLATE X.— The Same Pellets, dissected. The fur is shown in a
pile on the right, and, on the left, portions of skulls and other
bones of mice, shrews, and moles, eaten by the Owls.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 81
Navigators approaching their home port during seasons
of bird migration welcome the appearance of familiar land
birds which are seen while land is still far out of sight. Mr.
Frank M. Chapman has shown, in an interesting paper on
the ornithology of the first voyage of Columbus, that we
possibly owe the discovery of America by Columbus to the
fact that he happened to approach the land at the right time
and place to cross the line of the fall flight of land birds that
were going from the Bermudas to the Bahamas and Antilles.
The discouraged seainen were on the verge of mutiny, and
might have compelled Columbus to return to Spain, had not
small land birds come aboard unwearied and singing. The
course of the vessel was changed to correspond with the
direction of their flight, and the voyage was thus shortened
two hundred miles and pursued to its end.!
The well-known services of Vultures, which destroy gar-
bage and carrion in the tropics, have no real counterpart in
the north. Crows are of some use, but Gulls and other
water-birds are most valuable to man in this respect, in that
they devour the garbage and refuse that are cast into harbors
and arms of the sea, thus undoubtedly preventing the pollu-
tion of many bays and beaches by floating filth and refuse
from great cities.
Sea birds must be reckoned among the chief agencies which
have rendered many rocky or sandy islands fit for human
habitation. The service performed by birds in fertilizing,
soil-building, and seed-sowing on many barren islands has
entitled our feathered friends to the gratitude of many a
shipwrecked sailor, who must else have perished miserably
on barren, storm-beaten shores.
THE COMMERCIAL VALUE OF BIRDS.
In all the foregoing we have considered mainly “the good
offices that birds voluntarily take upon themselves in our
service.” We have yet to take into account the tax which
we impose upon them for our own revenue of profit or
pleasure, — a tax which we collect unsparingly, and with the
strong hand of force.
1 Papers presented at the World's Congress on Ornithology, 1896, pp. 181-185,
82 USEFUL BIRDS.
This tribute of flesh, blood, and feather is levied largely
upon those orders of birds which in domestication become
poultry, and in the wild state are known as game birds; but
many small land birds have become victims of man’s greed,
and the sea birds have been forced to contribute to his food
supply.
The eggs of certain Gulls, Terns, Herons, Murres, and
Ducks that breed in large colonies find a ready sale in the
market, or furnish a part of the food supply of the people
who live near these breeding places. Wholesale egging was
carried on along the coast of Massachusetts and other New
England States, until the Gulls and Terns were in most cases
driven away from their breeding places. The inhabitants
along the shores of the southern States, as well as those
“on the Pacific coast, gathered the eggs of the sea birds by
boatloads for many years. For nearly fifty years Murres’
eggs were collected on the Farallone Islands and shipped
to the San Francisco market. It is said that in 1854 more
than five hundred thousand eggs were sold there in less than
two months. This must have been an important item in the
food supply of the young and growing city. Mr. H. W.
Elliot mentions that on the occasion of his first visit to
Walrus Island in the Behring Sea six men loaded a badarrah,
carrying four tons, to the water’s edge with Murres’ eggs.
On Laysan, one of the Hawaiian Islands, there is a great
breeding place of an Albatross (Diomedea immutabilis).
Such immense quantities of their eggs have been gathered
that cars have been loaded with them.' All this egg collect-
ing, however, should be stopped, for it tends to exterminate
the birds, and all the eggs needed for human consumption
can be produced by poultry.
Sea birds which breed on isolated islands or barren shores
feed mainly on animal food, which they get from the sea.
Guano consists of the excreta and ejecta of sea birds, mixed
with the remains of birds, fish, and other animals. It is found
on the gathering places of these birds. In the rainless lati-
1 A Review of Economic Ornithology in the United States, by Dr. T. S.
Palmer. Yearbook, United States Department of Agriculture, 1899, pp. 271, 272.
See this paper also for an account of the guano trade.
Cuqnjouoy ‘sure “ff Aq ydersoyoyg) ‘S839 TAL popvo] Weoq 9ABT[ SIBd
aIoIpM ‘spaq vas Jo sov[d Surpsatq Y “] ‘HW ‘pue[s] ueskeT wo sassoneqiy —‘IX ALV Id
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 83
tudes of the Pacific, near the equator, guano once accumulated
in tremendous deposits. It dried quickly, and where there
were no rains to wash it away it was preserved with most of its
fertilizing constituents intact. The guano found on islands
outside the dry latitudes is of less value, as its nitrogen is
quickly washed out or dissipated. The importance of guano
as a fertilizer was recognized in Peru by the Indians more
than three centuries ago. Under the Incas the birds on the
Chincha Islands were carefully protected, and the deposits
of guano jealously guarded. It is said that the penalty of
death was inflicted on any one who killed birds near these
rocks in the breeding season.
Humboldt, returning from his travels in tropical America
in 1804, carried some samples of guano to Europe, and first
called attention to the value of the deposits of this substance
on the Chincha Islands; but it was nearly forty years later
that guano became a stimulus to intensive agriculture, and
furnished a source of revenue to civilized nations. The vast
deposits on these three islands covered the rocks in some
places to a depth of ninety or one hundred feet. The amount
still undisturbed in 1853 was estimated by the official sur-
veyors of the Peruvian government as twelve million, three
hundred and seventy-six thousand, one hundred tons. Its
use was first attempted in England in 1840; at that time the
beds seemed inexhaustible. The guano trade soon became
so important as to be a source of diplomatic correspondence
between nations. It is said to have brought Peru and Chile
to the verge of war. By 1850 the price of Peruvian guano
had advanced in the United States to fifty dollars a ton, and
American enterprise began to seek guano elsewhere.
Americans have since filed with the government claims
to bout seventy-five guano islands in the South Pacific or
in the Caribbean Sea. The vast deposits on the Chinchas
are nearly exhausted, and fertilizers are now manufactured to
supply the demand. Undoubtedly, however, the discovery
and use of guano marked the beginning of the present enor-
mous trade in commercial fertilizers. The manurial value
of the phosphoric acid and nitrogen contained in fish has
now become quite generally recognized, and fleets of small
84 USEFUL BIRDS.
vessels are employed in seining menhaden and other fish for
use in the manufacture of fertilizers.
Notwithstanding the value of birds to man as destroyers
of insects and vermin, they are killed and utilized by him
in various ways.
The destruction of game birds has been so great in Mas-
sachusetts, and the demand so much in excess of the supply,
that birds are now imported from other States and from
other countries. It is becoming a serious question, with
those most interested, how we shall so regulate the shooting
of game birds that the supply may be kept up. The game
birds of America have a great intrinsic value as game. The
flesh of many is considered to rank high among delicacies.
The pursuit of these birds has formed a large part of the
occupation of many members of the rural population during
the shooting seasons, and a vast business has grown out of
the traffic in birds’ flesh. Anenormous game business has
been carried on by provision dealers in this country, and the
demand for game is continually increasing. Few accurate
statistics of the amount of game sold are obtainable; but
Mr. D. G. Elliot, writing in 1864, states that one dealer in
New York was known to receive twenty tons of Prairie
Chickens in one consignment, and that some of the larger
poultry dealers were estimated to have sold from one hun-
dred and fifty thousand to two hundred thousand game birds
in the course of six months.!
The killing of birds for sport has a certain economic affin-
ity with market hunting, in that it supports a large trade in
guns, ammunition, boats, dogs, and all the tools, appliances,
and impedimenta of the sportsman. It furnishes employment
to guides, dog breakers, and boatmen, and helps support
many country hostelries and seaside hotels. The manufac-
ture of firearms and ammunition for sportsmen has become
a great industry. Altogether, many thousands of men are
dependent for a part of their livelihood on the killing of
game for sport or food, while a still larger army finds its
chief outdoor recreation in the pursuit of game birds. The
+ Report of the United States Commissioner of Agriculture, 1864, pp. 383, 384.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 85
value of game birds to the farmer, epicure, marketman, and
sportsman should insure them the most stringent protection.
Nevertheless, some of the migratory species, through lack
of effectual protection, have already been so reduced in num-
bers that they are no longer of any commercial importance.
The domestication of birds probably was coincident with
that of animals, and grew from the desire of the primitive
agriculturist to have always at hand a fresh supply of deli-
cate and nutritious animal food. No other animals can ever
be so adapted to the environments of civilization as to fur-
nish us with a similarly valuable supply of both meat and
eggs.
The poultry business of this country has grown to such
importance that the total value of the annual poultry prod-
uct has reached nearly three hundred million dollars. Mas-
sachusetts imported probably about eighteen million dollars’
worth of poultry products in 1903. When we consider that
in all the centuries the work of domestication has included
but a few species, it is evident that the possibilities in this
direction have not been exhausted.
Within the last half-century fashion has been responsible
for the killing of millions of birds for the millinery trade.
This trade is now limited by laws making it illegal to kill or
use most native birds, except game birds, for this purpose.
Instances of the destruction of birds for millinery purposes
will be given in another chapter. The American demand
for feathers for ornamental uses is now largely met by
articles manufactured from the feathers of domestic fowls
and game birds. The demand for Ostrich plumes has re-
sulted in the establishment of a new industry in America, —
the raising of Ostriches.
There has been a growing demand for American song birds
for cage purposes ; but this traffic is now prohibited by law.
THE ZSTHETIC, SENTIMENTAL, AND EDUCATIONAL
VALUE OF BIRDS.
Thus far I have written solely from the standpoint of
“enlightened selfishness,” entertaining no consideration of
the esthetic, humane, sentimental, or educational. I have
86 USEFUL BIRDS.
attempted to look at birds solely from the utilitarian point
of view, and to demonstrate the fact that their contributions
to man’s welfare have at least a material value. Now let us
turn for a moment from the contemplation of such utility
of birds as money can measure to “some of the higher and
nobler uses which birds subserve to man.” In so doing we
step at once from the beaten path of economic ornithology
into a boundless realm, sacred to art, letters, sentiment,
and poetry on the one hand, while on the other lie the fair
fields in which we may take up, if we will, the fascinating
study of birds, which may end merely in delightful experi-
ences, or lead to the class room, the museum, the laboratory,
or the closet of the systematist. Wherever it may lead us,
this phase of our subject is of the highest importance, and
demands the most serious consideration. Although presented
last, its benefactions should perhaps come first among the
items which go to make up the sum of our indebtedness to
birds.
The beauty of birds, the music of their songs, the weird
wildness of their calls, the majesty of their soaring flight,
the mystery of their migrations, have ever been subjects of
absorbing interest to poets, artists, and nature lovers every-
where. Prominent among the undying memories of men
are mental pictures of the birds of childhood, their coming
in the spring, their nesting, and their chosen haunts. Many
an exiled emigrant longs in vain to hear again the outpour-
ing melody of the Skylark, as it soars above the fields of
England. Many a New England boy, shut in by western
mountains, yearns for the bubbling, joyous song of the Bob-
olink in the June meadows. The characters and traits of
birds, their loves and battles, their skill in home building,
their devotion to their young, their habits and ways, —all
are of human interest. Birds have become symbolic of cer-
tain human characteristics ; and so the common species have
come to be so interwoven with our art and literature that
their names are household words. What biblical scholar is
not familiar with the birds of the Bible? Shakespeare makes
over six hundred references to birds or bird life. Much of
the best literature would lose half its charm were it shorn of
poetic allusions to birds.
VALUE OF BIRDS TO MAN. 87
Birds often have inspired the poets. Bryant's lines ” To
a Water-fowl,” and Shelley’s “Skylark,” each exhibit a phase
of such inspiration. These are but instances of the stimu-
lating power exerted on the mind of man by the bird and
its associations. Some of the grandest poems ever written
have been dependent on their authors’ observation of birds
for some touch of nature which has helped to render them
immortal. Thus Gray, in his famed “Elegy written in a
Country Churchyard” : —
The breezy call of incense-breathing morn,
The Swallow twittering from the straw-built shed,
The Cock’s shrill clarion, or the echoing horn,
No more shall rouse them from their lowly bed.
Who, reared in a country home, can fail, as he reads
these lines, to recall the twittering of the Swallows under
the spreading rafters in the cool of early morning? The
mental contemplation of that peaceful pastoral scene, the
train of tender recollections of the time of youth and inno-
cence, all tending toward better impulses and higher aspira-
tions, are largely due to the mention of the familiar bird in
its association with the home of childhood. Is not literature
the richer for the following lines of Longfellow in his “Birds
of Passage ”?
Above, in the light
Of the star-lit night,
Swift birds of passage wing their flight
Through the dewy atmosphere.
I hear the beat
Of their pinions fleet,
As from the land of snow and sleet
They seek a southern lea.
How much of life and color the presence of birds adds to
the landscape! ‘The artist appreciates this. What marine
view is complete without its Gulls in flight? How much a
flock of wild-fowl adds to a lake or river scene!
Birds are a special boon to child life, and a never-ending
“source of entertainment to many children who live upon
isolated farms, where the observation of birds’ habits adds
greatly to the rational enjoyment of existence.
It is not a far ery from the poet to the philosopher, and
88 USEFUL BIRDS.
he also sees a value in birds for the opportunity they afford
for the culture of the intellect. Every page of the book of
nature is educational. But, as Dr. Coues says, there is no
fairer or more fascinating page than that devoted to the life
history of a bird. The systematic study of birds develops
both the observational faculties and the analytical qualities
of the mind. The study of the living bird afield is rejuve-
nating to both mind and body. The outdoor use of eye, ear,
and limb, necessitated by field work, tends to fit both the
body and mind of the student for the practical work of life,
for it develops both members and faculties. It brings one
into contact with nature, — out into the sunlight, where balmy
airs stir the whispering pines, or fresh breezes ripple the blue
water. There is no purer joy in life than that which may
come to all who, rising in the dusk of early morning, wel-
come the approach of day with all its bird voices. The nature
lover who listens to the song of the Wood Thrush at dawn
—an anthem of calm, serene, spiritual joy, sounding through
the dim woods —hears it with feelings akin to those of the
devotee whose being is thrilled by the grand and sacred music
of the sanctuary. And he who, in the still forest at even-
ing, harkens to the exquisite notes of the Hermit, — that
voice of nature, expressing in sweet cadences her pathos and
her ineffable mystery, — experiences amid the falling shades
of night emotions which must humble, chasten, and purify
even the most upright and virtuous of men.
The uplifting influence that birds may thus exert upon the
lives of men constitutes to many their greatest value and
charm. Gaon
BIRDS, CATERPILLARS, AND PLANT LICE. 137
caterpillars from the web and ate them. There were two Crows in the
brown-tail moth tree when I came in sight of it. I saw one of them
peck twice at the branch, and swallow something. In attempting to get
nearer to them I made a noise, and frightened them away. Could find
nothing on the branch they were on except brown-tail moths, which
they were eating. The next visitor was an Oriole, who came to the
tree and ate thirty-four larve in six minutes, then flew away. He
hammered each larva once or twice before swallowing it. The next
visitor was a Wilson’s Thrush. He first perched on a small oak on the
top of the ledge, then hopped to the dry leaves, and seemed to be
searching among them for food for about five minutes. Then he flew
to the tree and took a larva while in sight and swallowed it. He
probably took more while in the tree. He was in the tree four minutes.
He then flew down and began searching in the grass. A Red-eyed
Vireo perched in the oaks and searched for about nine minutes. I saw
him take over fifty larvae of various kinds from the leaves, some of
which were leaf-rollers. I could see him picking insects from the under
sides of the leaves. ‘Io accomplish this he would grasp the petiole with
his feet, and hang, back down, and pick the larvee off. He then went
to the apple tree and took twenty-nine larvee (brown-tail) before flying
across the boulevard. He was in the apple tree about six minutes. He
beat nearly every one on the branch before eating it.
From this and later experiences it seems that many birds
have learned to eat the larve of the brown-tail moth even
when the caterpillars reach an age when the detachable hairs
are dangerous. Probably by shaking off these hairs the birds
render the larve eatable, and even fit to feed to their young.
May 25.—A Golden-winged Warbler came to the oak trees next
the boulevard, and sang for nearly five minutes in a low, wiry voice.
He then began searching for food. Frequently I would see him take
some small green larve from the leaves, but could. not tell what kind
it was. He then flew to the apple tree and picked eleven brown-tail
larvee from the leaves and swallowed them, after hammering them on
the limbs. He probably took more while feeding in the tree, about
eight minutes. He then flew over the ledge. A pair of Orioles were
back and forth over the ledge, and would occasionally stop and eat the
brown-tail larvee for a moment or two, but did not make a long stay
while I was there. They had probably got their fill earlier in the day.
An Indigo Bird lit in the top of one of the oak trees for a moment, then
flew to the apple tree and ate six of the brown-tail larve, and was then
chased out by the English Sparrows. Three of the Sparrows perched
in the tree and picked off two or three brown-tail larve apiece, then
flew to the boulevard. A pair of Scarlet Tanagers perched for about
138 USEFUL BIRDS.
twelve minutes in the apple tree, and were busy all the time eating
brown-tail larve. I could see but one distinctly, and he ate forty-three
brown-tails that I saw, and probably a few more, but not many.
May 26.—I watched a Maryland Yellow-throat on the low willow
sprouts, and saw him pick off fifty-two gipsy moth larve before flying
away. Isaw Warblers flying in and out among the trees, taking one
here and another there all the time I was there, but could not watch
any one individual for any length of time. The Yellow Warblers were
taking them from the trunks as well as the sprouts, and also in the tops
of the tall trees. A pair came to a bunch of sprouts near me, and I
counted thirty-five gipsy larve that they took in the two minutes they
were there. A pair of English Sparrows have a nest in a hollow tree in
the grove, and they are almost continually chasing the Warblers and
other birds that come near them ; but I did not see them feed any in the
grove, —they go out to the streets and dooryards. The Redstarts were
also eating large numbers of the larve. One that I got near enough
to observe ate thirty-one gipsy larvee before he left the clump of willows.
At the brown-tail moth tree a Black-billed Cuckoo came, and, going
to a branch where the larva were very numerous, began eating them
greedily. Te had taken four mouthfuls when a Robin, that has a nest
in a pine tree near, chased him out. A Yellow-throated Vireo came to
the tree and ate fourteen brown-tails in less than five minutes. He
probably ate many more, as he could not be distinctly seen nearly all
of the time. A Red-eyed Vireo came to the opposite side of the tree
and ate several larve, but his doings could not be clearly seen. A
male Indigo Bird perched on the topmost branch of the apple tree and
sang for several minutes, then hopped down a branch or two and
picked the larvee from the branch. I saw him eat sixteen of them
(brown-tails) after he had hammered them on the branch.
May 27.—A Yellow-billed Cuckoo came to a willow tree near me
and ate forty-seven forest tent caterpillars in six minutes, then flew
to a small maple tree and sat on a branch for nearly ten minutes and
plumed his feathers, then returned to the willow and ate sixteen more,
and flew away. He would take the caterpillar and hammer it once
or twice, then swallow it. A Blue Jay came, and took two of the
forest tent caterpillars and flew away with them. A male Redstart ate
three forest tent caterpillars. He would take one, fly to a neighboring
branch, hammer it well, swallow it, then go back for another. A male
Oriole came to the tree three times during the forenoon, and fed on the
forest tent caterpillars. The first time he came he stayed four minutes,
and took eighteen caterpillars ; the second time he stayed seven minutes,
and took twenty-six larvee; and the last time he stayed about ten min-
utes, and ate fourteen larve. At the brown-tail moth tree there were
quite a number of birds feeding in the surrounding trees, but not nearly
all the species visited the apple tree. A Red-eyed Vireo came to the
tree and would take the brown-tail moth larvee and hammer them a
BIRDS, CATERPILLARS, AND PLANT LICE. 139
few minutes, then pull the larger ones to pieces, and swallow them ;
the smaller ones she would swallow whole. I saw her eat fifteen in the
eight minutes she was in the tree. A Catbird came to the tree, picked
four brown-tail larvee from the branch, and ate them, and would prob-
ably have eaten more, but a Robin chased her out of the grove toward
the boulevard. She would give the larve a knock or two, then swal-
low them.
May 29. A pair of Blue Jays were very busy carrying food to their
young. They came twenty-four times to a willow tree, with forest tent
caterpillars on it, during the three hours I was there, and took at least
two or three larvee each time. Once they went to some hazel bushes
near by, where a Chestnut-sided Warbler was sitting, and would prob-
ably have taken the eggs, if I had not interfered. A White-breasted
Nuthatch came to a willow and climbed around the trunk for a time,
when she found two forest tent caterpillars. She ate one after hammer-
ing it for a moment, but passed over the other. I saw her pass over
two others in the same way, apparently preferring to pick the smaller
insects from the bark. These were so small that I could not see what
they were. A Wood Thrush took two of the forest tent caterpillars and
ate them, and later in the day I saw a Wood Thrush go to the apple
tree and eat five of the brown-tail larve, and then fly away. Isawa
Flicker alight on an ant hill and make a hole in the hill with her bill,
and pick up the ants. She was busy in this way for nearly fifteen min-
utes, and must have eaten large numbers of them. I found in the thick
woods a few oak trees that were badly infested with forest tent cater-
pillars, and there were quite a number of them on the low bushes on
the ground. A Chewink came to the brush, scratched in the leaves and
pulled out large grubs, but I could not make sure what they were. , She
then hopped about and took six of the forest tent caterpillars, beat them
on the ground, and atethem, An unwise move on my part frightened
her away. A Black-billed Cuckoo came and gorged himself. He ate
twenty-nine forest tent caterpillars at first, then rested between ten and
fifteen minutes, then ate fourteen more. He would shake and hammer
one on the branch, then swallow it, and pick up another. A Nashville
Warbler came to the apple tree, picked a brown-tail larva from the
leaves, beat and shook it for about thirty seconds, and swallowed it;
then took another, hammered it in the same way, and swallowed it.
He then flew to the low shrubs. A Robin was passing to and fro, but
I did not see her eat any of the brown-tails; she seemed to eat nothing
but what she took from the ground. The anglewornis were plentiful
that day, and she had no appetite for anything else.
May 81.— An Indigo Bird came to the brown-tail moth tree, took a
brown-tail larva from the leaves, and flew to a low branch, shook and
hammered the larva, and ate it. He then went back, took another, and
flew with it to a neighboring oak, ate the larva, and flew away. A
Warbling Vireo sung and fed in the oak trees for nearly thirty minutes.
140 USEFUL BIRDS.
Te then went to the apple tree and took a brown-tail moth larva, picked
it to pieces, and swallowed it. He then took another, and was proceed-
ing in the same way, when he was driven out by the English Sparrow,
and flew up over the ledge out of sight. A pair of Red-eyed Vireos were
in the oaks near the apple tree for a long time, foraging. They would
hold on to the petiole of the leaf, hang with their heads down, and take
insects from the under sides of the leaves. One of them went to the
apple tree, took a brown-tail larva from the leaves, beat it on the branch,
and swallowed it. His mate then flew across the street, and he followed.
A Yellow-throated Vireo went to a small oak tree and took three gipsy
moth larve that were resting ona burlap band. She scarcely stopped
to shake them at all, but swallowed them at once. A pair of Chestnut-
sided Warblers were busy taking cankerworms to their young. They
averaged one each, every three minutes for nearly thirty minutes. In
the mean time they themselves ate quite a number. The young could
not have been more than a day old. A Yellow Warbler came to an oak
tree on the edge of the orchard and took two forest tent caterpillars, then
flew to the thick apple trees and fed on cankerworms. Four Waxwings
visited the orchard for a few minutes and ate a few cankerworms, but
they seemed to be picking into the blossoms of the young fruit more than
anything else. A Redstart took a forest tent caterpillar from a branch,
hammered it, and ate it. He then flew out and caught a small moth,
then flew into the thick woods. A female Black and White Warbler
took a forest tent caterpillar from the trunk of an oak, flew with it to
the ground, hammered it until she broke it in pieces, and then swal-
lowed the pieces.
JuNE 1.— An English Sparrow came to the apple tree, took a brown-
tail moth larva, and, after hammering it for a moment, flew away with
it to her young. A Field Sparrow came to the open space around the
apple tree, foraged among the bushes for a few moments,
then perched in a small oak and sang. He then flew to the
apple tree, took a brown-tail larva, flew to the ground with it,
and ate it. He then flew to the open fields across Highland
Avenue. A pair of Orioles came to the tree, and the mule
ate sixteen and the female twenty-five brown-tails. They
were in the tree seven minutes. A Yellow-billed Cuckoo came to the
tree and stayed about eighteen minutes, including a rest he took. He
ate thirty-four brown-tails, then rested seven minutes, and
ate twelve more. He would give them a couple of shakes,
and swallow them. The Robin coming in spied him, and
chased him out. A Rose-breasted Grosbeak visited a tree
for a moment and took at least five brown-tail larva.
He probably took more, as he was not in sight all the time. A pair
of Chickadees also visited the tree; they stayed about five minutes.
One ate nineteen brown-tail larves, and the other ate eight that I saw ;
he probably ate many more, as I could not watch him all the time,
.
BIRDS, CATERPILLARS, AND PLANT LICE. 141
being occupied with the other bird. A Yellow-throated Vireo came
through the place, visited the tree for a moment, and took two larvee,
then passed on. A male Golden-winged Warbler ate two forest tent
caterpillars, after hammering them a long time until he got them in
pieces. A female Black and White Warbler took a forest tent cater-
pillar from the trunk of a tree near me, flew to the ground and beat it
until she got it in pieces, when she took the inside parts and flew away
to her young, leaving the other parts on the ground; she did not come
back for them. A Red-eyed Vireo took a forest tent caterpillar from
a branch and hammered it, then he pulled it to pieces and ate it all.
The next one he treated in the same way, except that he ate only the
inside, and dropped the skin and head to the ground.
strong barbs, which make of it a Wigs 104, —Spastine waruetp
weapon more effective in its way | of Downy Woodpecker, much
than a fish spear. The machinery See
for thrusting it forth is most perfect. The bone of the
tongue, called the hyoid, has two branches which pass down-
ward and backward from the lower jaw, up and around the
back of the head, and over the top of the skull, where they
I!
SONGLESS BIRDS OF ORCHARD AND WOODLAND. 247
either pass into the nostrils and so on in channels down
toward the end of the upper mandible of the beak, or, turn-
ing to one side, coil themselves about the bony part of the
eyeball. These branches of the hyoid are enclosed in
sheaths which fit into a groove on the top of the skull. By
means of this apparatus the tongue may be extended so
that, in the Hairy Woodpecker, it may reach an inch and
a half beyond the end of the bill. The tongue is propelled
forward at need by powerful muscles, so that when the bird
has drilled to the burrow of a boring beetle it can open the
beak slightly, protrude the tongue, spear the insect and
draw it out and into the mouth. Birds which possess such
implements for the destruction of boring insects must be
immensely serviceable to man, for borers are difficult for
man to control.
The utility of Woodpeckers is now quite generally recog-
nized by foresters, and by entomologists who study forest in-
sects. Dr. A. D. Hopkins, the most active and experienced
forest entomologist in the United States, is quoted by Dr.
E. P. Felt as asserting that Woodpeckers are the most im-
portant enemies of spruce bark beetles, and appear to be of
inestimable value to the spruce timber interests of the north-
east. Dr. Hopkins also states that Woodpeckers are the
principal enemies of the destructive sap-wood borers.
It is sometimes argued that Woodpeckers are of little use
as protectors of trees, since they never dig into living wood.
This reasoning is based on an error, due to
lack of careful observation. Nuttall speaks
of a Flicker that dug a nest hole eighteen
inches deep in a green sassafras. Dr. Hop-
kins figures a section of a living tree in which
a hole four inches long, two wide, and five
deep had been made by Woodpeckers in their
search for boring larve. According to the Fig.105.—a pine
annual wood rings around the entrance of the sis
cavity, the tree recovered and lived at least fifteen years after
the bird captured the borers. The work of Woodpeckers on
living trees does not ordinarily attract much notice. They
seldom need to dig far into live trees for borers, for most
248 USEFUL BIRDS.
species that infest live trees are found during a part or all of
their lives just under the bark or in the sap-wood not very
far from the surface; and the Woodpecker can drill a small
hole into the burrow, insert its open beak, and
with its tongue spear and extract the insect.
The wound soon heals, leaving no noticeable
trace. A Woodpecker may thus reach insects
at a depth of from one to four inches, accord-
ing to the size of the bird. Dead trees, how-
ever, are riddled with borers in all their parts,
Fig. 106.—Pates 20d the birds are obliged to delve deeply to
weevil,adestruc- find them; therefore, the work of the birds
tive pine insect, , a :
eaten by Wood. in dead trees is most noticeable.
packers. The chief value of the Woodpeckers con-
sists in the fact that when they find a tree infested with bor-
ers they are likely to keep at work upon it until no more
larvee can be found. Thus they often save the tree, and
check an incipient outbreak of borers. Woodpeckers so en-
gaged sometimes destroy parasites of boring insects. Such
destruction of useful insects by these birds is of little conse-
quence; for when the birds destroy the grubs, the parasites
are not needed. When the birds are too few in numbers to
prevent an increase of boring insects, the parasites also have
‘a similar immunity from the attacks of birds, and so are free
to exert their influence in restraining the borers. If Wood-
peckers should eat an undue number of parasites, they might
then be doing harm; but such cases probably seldom occur.
The Woodpeckers are also useful in providing homes for
other birds. Most Woodpeckers each year hollow out from
the wood a home for their young, and rarely, if ever, use it
more than one season. Some species, of which the Downy
and the Hairy Woodpeckers are familiar examples, also
excavate holes to which they retire for shelter during winter
nights. The larger Woodpeckers often make deep holes in
dead trees while digging out large borers or colonies of ants.
When the carpenter birds are through with these cavities
they are sometimes used as nesting places by other birds
that are unable to excavate for themselves. The deserted
nests of the Downy Woodpecker are used by the Wren, the
PLATE XX.— Downy Woodpecker at Nest Hole. (Photograph,
from life, by C. A. Reed.) (From American Ornithology.)
SONGLESS BIRDS OF ORCHARD AND WOODLAND. 249
Chickadee, or even the Tree Swallow; those of the Hairy
Woodpecker may be used by Bluebirds, Martins, or Swal-
lows ; those of the Flicker by the Screech Owl and the Wood
Duck. The excavations made by Woodpeckers in securing
insects are often used by the Chickadee or the Wren.
Notwithstanding their usefulness, however, the Wood-
peckers have been subject to the most senseless and unjust
persecution for many years, merely because a single species,
which rarely breeds in Massachusetts, feeds largely on the
sap and cambium layer of both fruit trees and forest trees.
This species (the Yellow-bellied Sapsucker) has not the
strong, barbed tongue of the typical Woodpeckers.
Eight species of Woodpecker occur in Massachusetts, but
only two, the Downy Woodpecker and the Flicker, are com-
mon residents throughout the State. The Hairy Wood-
pecker is also common, though less so than the others, and
more local. All other species are usually rare migrants,
except the Sapsucker, which is seen regularly in spring and
fall, and the Pileated Woodpecker, which is local.
It is a popular error to speak of all Woodpeckers as either
Sapsuckers or Red-headed Woodpeckers. ‘The males of all
our Woodpeckers have red on the back of the head or nape ;
but the Red-headed Woodpecker has the head, throat, and
neck red all round. Although once common locally in Mas-
sachusetts, it is now rare ordinarily, and seldom breeds in
the State. The birds now generally known in Massachu-
setts as “Red-headed Woodpeckers ” are the species herein~
after described under their proper names.
Downy Woodpecker.
Dryobates pubescens medianus.
Length. — About six and one-half inches.
Adult Male.—- Upper parts black, striped, and barred with white; a small scarlet
patch at the back of the head. ‘
Adult Female. — Similar, but without the scarlet on head.
Young. — The scarlet patch in the male gives place to reddish-brown.
Nest.—In a hole made by the birds in a dead stump or limb.
Eggs. — White.
Season. — Resident.
This sprightly little bird, the smallest of the Woodpeckers,
is also the most useful. It is found commonly throughout
250 USEFUL BIRDS.
most of the State wherever trees grow. Its sharp, clear, in-
cisive notes are aptly compared by Chapman to the ring of
a marble quarrier’s chisel. Its only approach to a musical
performance is its resonant drumming on a sounding hollow
‘limb or bird box. This habit, which it has in common with
other Woodpeckers, seems to be resorted to out of pure
exuberance of joy and vigorous life ; it is, with this carpenter
bird, a fitting substitute for song.
The nesting cavity is wrought out with happy labor in some
dead limb. The entrance is just large enough to admit the
owner by tight squeezing, and the interior is trimmed into
graceful curves, rounding at the bottom into a receptacle for
the snowy eggs. The birds sometimes carry the chips away,
but are often careless of concealment, and let them fall about
the foot of the tree.
Downy is a bird of the old orchard in summer. He prefers
to inhabit trees that are neglected by their owners, and
assumes the self-appointed guardianship of such trees in the
happiest frame of mind imaginable. He does this for the
reason that these neglected orchards harbor a host of insects
and vermin, in the destruction of which he revels. Under
those scales of bark there lurk in early spring the larve of
the codling moth, which pass the winter in their loosely spun
cocoons. Downy knows just where to findthem. He circles
the trunk and limbs, climbs up or comes down backward,
and ever and anon he taps and sounds the bark, until the
tell-tale vibration given back by the scale above the cocoon
corroborates the evidence of his eyes. Every stroke with
which he knocks on the door of an insect’s retreat sounds
the crack of doom. He pierces the bark with his beak,
then with his barbed tongue drags forth the insect, and
moves on to tap the last summons on the dvor of the next
in line. Now and then an intelligent bird carries the warfare
against the apple worm still farther, and pecks the fruit upon
the tree; but, so far as my experience goes, he attacks only
wormy fruit, and when he has the worm he leaves the apple.
Dr. Trimble, in his book entitled “Insects Injurious to
Fruits,” asserts that he found numerous instances where the
bird had penetrated the cocoons of the codling moth.
SONGLESS BIRDS OF ORCHARD AND WOODLAND. 251
Dr. Rufus H. Petit, entomologist of the Michigan Experi-
ment Station, says that in almost every case where cocoons
of this insect were concealed under flakes of bark the birds
had found them. “Such pierced cocoons,” he says, “are the
common thing in our orchards, especially where they have
been above the snow line.” Fig. 107,
which is drawn from a reproduction of
his photograph, shows the inner surface
of a flake of bark, the remains of a
cocoon attached, and the hole made by
the bill of the bird.
A large part of the food of this Wood-
pecker, while in the orchard, consists
of wood-boring beetles, their larve, pig, 107.—cocoonot cod-
and various bark beetles and weevils. ling moth, pierced by
Hardly another bird, excepting the suc- oer
ceeding species, can compete with this in destroying borers,
such as the round-headed apple borer, that infest fruit trees.
In securing these insects it never does the trees any percep-
tible harm. In many cases it perforates the bark of apple
trees with small, roundish holes, less than an inch apart,
~ disposed in parallel horizontal rings. Nuttall says that these
holes are made for the purpose of drink-
ing sap from the trees. But this work is
not done for the sake of the sap, if, as
Fig. 108.—Apple tree Wilson says, it is always performed in
oe the fall, at a time when the sap is not flow-
ing; possibly the bird takes out bits of the cambium layer ;
Wilson believed it was delving for insects ; but whatever the
reason, the trees so perforated seem to be invigorated rather
than injured by the process, which is not the case with trees
similarly attacked by the true Sapsucker. The Holes made
by the Sapsucker are different in shape, being square rather
than round.
Townend Glover, formerly entomologist to the United
States Department of Agriculture, stated that he observed
the Downy making a number of small, rough-edged perfora-
tions in the bark of an ash tree, and found that wherever the
bark had been thus injured the young larva of a wood-eating
252 , USEFUL BIRDS.
beetle had been snugly coiled underneath, and had been de-
stroyed by the bird, thus proving conclusively to his mind
that these holes are made for the purpose of finding insect
food.
But Downy does not confine his attacks to the hidden
enemies of trees; he takes caterpillars and weevils from
twigs, buds, and branches. His young are largely fed on
caterpillars of various sorts. Ants and plant lice — those
ill-assorted masters and servants—are slaughtered in im-
mense numbers.
The following, from Mr. Kirkland’s notes, exhibits this
bird as a destroyer of the woolly aphis : —
While in Amherst, Oct. 20, 1895, I was able to approach to within
six to eight feet of a Downy Woodpecker which was feeding on a small
apple tree. The bird was busy hunting the twigs overfor food. Isaw
it eat a number of leaf miners’ (Tineid) cocoons, which were attached
to the smalltwigs. Some of these were undoubtedly Bucculatriz pomi-
foliella. Other cocoons were not oblong, but elliptical; nearly all
cocoons contained a small green larva. A subsequent examination of
twigs which the bird had searched showed that the cocoons it had left
were parasitized. On the tree were many bark lice (Mytilaspis pomo-
rum), but I did not see the bird feed on them. The fact of greatest in-
terest to me was that the bird apparently sought out the small cavities
(made by pruning) on the branches, and fed upon the woolly aphis
(Schizoneura lanigera), which had clustered in masses in the cavities.
This apbis sometimes does considerable damage to apple trees. Mr.
Frost*is of the opinion that the aphis also prevents the healing over of
wounds made by pruning. It is a well-known fact that clusters of this
aphis commonly occur on the callus which develops around wounds,
apparently making it their feeding ground.
The imagoes of nocturnal moths that rest on trees during
the day are taken by this bird, and he eats the eggs of many
insects. He may well be regarded as one of the best of the
feathered friends of the orchardist. But it is in the woods
and among the shade trees that the good qualities of the
Downy come out strongest.
When the Metropolitan Park Commission first began to
set out young trees along the parkways near Boston, some
species of trees were attacked by numerous borers; but the
Downy Woodpeckers found them out and extracted the grubs,
SONGLESS BIRDS OF ORCHARD AND WOODLAND. 253
saving most of the trees. The cut (Fig. 109) shows a por-
tion of the top of one of these trees, riddled by the borer.
The knife-cut at the bottom exposes their galleries. The
small perforations along the stem were made by
the Woodpecker in extracting the grubs.
The untiring industry of this bird and the per-
fection of its perceptive powers may be shown
by the experience of Mr. Bailey. On March 28,
1899, a Downy Woodpecker that he watched
climbed over and inspected one hundred and
eighty-one woodland trees between 9.40 a.m.
and 12.15 p.m., and made twenty-six excava-
tions for food. Most of these holes exposed gal-
leries in the trunks or in high branches where
wood-boring ants were hiding. The openings
that the bird drilled in piercing one of these
tunnels in a branch some thirty-five feet from
the ground are shown in Fig. 110. It had un-
covered dormant black ants, and in each case had
pierced their
burrow at
the exact spot
where they were
gathered. These
wood-boring ants
often gain an entrance
at some unprotected
spot on a living tree, and
so excavate the wood of the
trunk that the tree is blown
down by the wind. This Wood- :
pecker acts as a continual check Fie. 109.
on the increase of such ants.
ae Ge ee The delicacy of that sense of touch or
Woodpecker and audition by which the bird was enabled to
eae locate those motionless insects in their hid-
den burrow must ever command our admiration, unendowed
as we are with such delicate perceptive powers.
Another Downy Woodpecker was seen on March 31 taking
254 USEFUL BIRDS.
the larve of boring beetles from beneath the bark of oak trees.
The bird seemed to know the exact spot at which to drill for
each larva, for it always cut a small hole directly over the
insect. The cut (Fig. 111) gives a view of the outer surface
of a section of bark taken froma small oak. From this small
piece of bark the
bird probably se-
cured at least six
of the larve that
were found in its
stomach. The
holes at a, 0, ¢,
d, e, f, indicate
those from which
the larve were
taken. Fig. 112
gives a view of
the inner surface
of the same piece
of bark, showing
how true was the
stroke of the
bird, for its beak,
piercing from the
outside, went di-
rectly to the cen-
ter of the burrow
where the dormant insects lay, entirely hidden from view.
The letters a, 6, c, d, e, f, indicate the holes where the
bird’s beak came through to the inner surface. Twelve
ants and seventeen larve of boring beetles were found in
its stomach.
The Downy Woodpecker is one of the most useful of all
birds to the lumberman, for it feeds on such destructive
insects as the bronze birch borer, the maple borer, and the
pine weevil, —an insect of such importance that its habits
merit some description here. This little insect (Pissodes
strobi) deposits its eggs on the topmost shoots of the finest
and most vigorous young white pines, and the young larve
Fig. 111. Pig. 112.
SONGLESS BIRDS OF ORCHARD AND WOODLAND. 255
eat away the wood, and thus destroy the leading shoot or
main stem of the tree. As the side shoots grow upward
they also are attacked, and the tree is ruined for timber.
Instead of growing a tall, straight trunk, it grows straggling
branches. Quite often the leading shoot of a tree is attacked
Fig. 118.— Pine top killed by pine Fig. 114.— Tree crooked and ruined for
weevil. timber by pine weevil.
in this way year after year. Each attack results in a crook
in the trunk, and the tree when grown is fit only for kindling
wood. Perhaps no insect isa greater pest to the lumberman
than this. While examining the work of this insect in a
fine grove of young white pines I saw that many of the bur-
rows had been perforated by birds, and the grubs extracted.
It appears that Dr. Fitch also noticed this, for he says that
small birds are very efficient in ferreting out and devouring
256 USEFUL BIRDS.
the larve and pupe of this weevil. He does not, however,
name the birds.!
I have seen many shoots from which this insect had been
removed by birds, and most of them showed the character-
istic work of this Woodpecker. Some other Woodpeckers
and the Chickadee are probably useful in this respect. The
Downy Woodpecker hunts borers to the very twigs. Mr.
Kirkland saw a mother bird pecking away at twigs infested
by the oak pruner, taking out the larve and feeding them
to her young.
There is some reason for calling the Downy a sapsucker.
Occasionally he is accused of tapping the smaller limbs and
twigs of maples and other trees for their sap. Nuttall says
he has seen the bird drinking sap from the trees, and that it
bores into the wax myrtle for that purpose. I have never
been able to observe this, and ornithologists generally deny
‘that it is a fact. But Mr. Bailey’s observations seem to
prove that the farmer is not altogether wrong in his appella-
tion of the bird. The habit, however, seems to be not a
common one. Mr. Bailey’s experience has been spoken of
in a paper read before the American Ornithologists’ Union,
and in another published in the annual report of the secretary
of the Massachusetts State Board of Agriculture for 1900 ;
but I am now able to present cuts from drawings of two
stems tapped by the Downy, which show the ingenious
method employed by the bird, also how its perforations
differ from those made by the Sapsucker. The quotation
from Mr. Bailey’s field notes follows : —
At 12.30 I found a Downy Woodpecker, and watched him till 2.45;
he took three larvee from a maple stub, just under the bark. He next
tapped two small swamp maples, four and six feet from the ground,
and spent most of the time taking sap. He tapped the tree by pecking
it a few times very lightly; it looked like a slight cut, slanting a little.
The bird would sit and peck the sap out of the lower part of the cut.
The cut was so small the sap did not collect very fast. The bird would
go and sit for a long time in a large tree, then it would come back and
take more sap. It did this three times while I was watching it. It did
1 Insects Injurious to Forest and Shade Trees, by A. S. Packard. Fifth
Report of the United States Entomological Commission, quotation from Fitch,
p. 740.
SONGLESS BIRDS OF ORUHARD AND WOODLAND. 257
not care to take any food but the sap. I could get within six feet of
the bird without any trouble while it was taking sap. It then left and
went into a large tree, and I lost it; but if I had stayed by the tree I
think it would have come back before night, as it had done when I was
watching it, for it was gone half an hour at one time.
The two young trees that were tapped were red maples
(Acer rubrum). The incisions in each case were similar,
and from their appearance we may as-
sume that the bird first struck its bill
into the bark from the right upward,
and then from
the left down-
ward, leaving a
small bridge of
bark to cover
the opening.
It then took
the sap by in-
serting its bill
at the lower
orifice, a, the
upper one, 8,
allowing the
free entrance of
air to facilitate
the flow of the
sap out of the
lower at a.
The vegetable
food of this
Woodpecker
is varied and
rather small in
quantity. In
spring it eats a
few buds and petals of flowers; some berries, such as June-
berries and wild strawberries, in summer; and in fall and
winter it eats pokeberries, poison ivy, sumac, mullein, and
other seeds. Frozen apples are eaten in winter. According
Fig. 115. Fig 116.
258 USEFUL BIRDS.
to Professor Beal, Dr. Merriam found the stomachs of four
birds filled with beechnuts, and has seen this species eat the
berries of the mountain ash. It eats bayberries also.
Hairy Woodpecker.
Dryobates villosus.
Length. — About nine and one-half inches,
Adult. — Quite similar to the Downy Woodpecker, but much larger; the bill pro-
portionately longer.
Nest.— A hole cut in a tree by the bird.
Eggs. — White.
Season. — Resident.
The Hairy Woodpecker, like the preceding species, lives
to such an extent on the grubs of boring beetles and on
wood-boring ants that it can find food at all times of the
year. In very cold winters,
however, when the trees are
solidly frozen for months, both
these species find it difficult to
dig out borers from living trees.
In the winter of 1903-04, which
was exceedingly cold, the
Woodpeckers were compelled
to work on dry limbs and fence
rails, wood piles, and any dry
Fig. 117.—Hairy Woodpecker, male, timber they could find. They
about one-half natural size. da seh isda ke help theme
selves to waste meat, fat, or suet in winter.
The Hairy Woodpecker is less common than the Downy,
but individually is about as useful. Its sharp, clicking notes
much resemble those of its smaller congener, but they are
stronger, and have a wilder sound. The bird may be easily
recognized by its large size and its vigorous, rapid move-
ments. Like all Woodpeckers, its flight is rather undulat-
ing, as though, by reason of its excess of vigor, it could not
help leaping and bounding through the air.” It is usually
shyer than the Downy, and is found more in timber lands
than in orchards ; but becomes tamer where it is not molested
by man, and sometimes breeds in the orchard.
Maurice Thompson says that this bird strikes its bill into
SONGLESS BIRDS OF -ORCHARD AND WOODLAND. 259
the wood and then for an instant holds the point of one
mandible in the dent thus made, while it listens for the
movements of the borer. He contends that the vibrations
produced by the insect in the wood are conveyed through
the bill of the bird to its brain.
This bird eats less animal food in proportion to its vege-
table food than does the Downy Woodpecker ; and accord-
ing to Professor Beal it eats more beetles, more caterpillars,
and less ants, than does its smaller relative. Beetles and
their larve form fully one-third of its insect food, and a large
part of these consists of the larger wood-boring insects. Its
special usefulness inheres in its large size, its long beak and
tongue, and its power of drilling deep into the trees and
extracting from trunks and branches the larger pernicious
borers. In this respect the bird is more nearly indispensa-
ble to the forester and orchardist than any other bird of the
State, except perhaps the Pileated Woodpecker, which is so
local as to be of much less value generally. Mr. J. M.
Baskett tells of some Siberian crab trees in his yard that were
attacked by borers. One of the trees died; but a Hairy
Woodpecker came, worked diligently, and cleaned out all the
grubs, thus saving the remaining trees.
This Woodpecker is often quite destructive to hairy cat-
erpillars, and feeds its young on noxious larve of many
species. It also attacks the pupe or chrysalids of many in-
jurious moths, among them those of the gipsy moth. Moths
that hibernate in cocoons during the winter are particularly
exposed to the attacks of this Woodpecker. Dr. F. M.
Webster states that he saw one of these birds peck through
the cocoon of the cecropia moth, and devour the contents.
On examining more than a score of these cocoons, he found
only two uninjured by the bird. Ants, grasshoppers, and
spiders are eaten.
Its vegetable food is much like that of the Downy, but is
consumed in much larger quantity. It sometimes takes a
little corn; in summer it feeds much on wild cherries, and
in the fall on wild grapes to some extent. Like the Downy,
it eats a little of the inner bark or cambium from the tree
trunks, and possibly may take some sap.
260 USEFUL BIRDS.
~
While this bird often excavates a hole for a winter shelter,
it sometimes sleeps exposed on a tree trunk. Mr. Bailey
and I once watched one that slept for many winter nights on
the north side of a tree trunk in a thick grove. It attached
its claws to the bark and went to sleep in much the same
position in which it ordinarily climbed the tree. It inva-
riably went to the same tree at night, and was found in the
same place at daylight each morning.
Northern Flicker. Golden-winged Woodpecker. Pigeon Woodpecker.
Yellow Hammer. Partridge Woodpecker. Wake-up. Gaffer Wood-
pecker, High-hole, High-holder, etc.
Colaptes auratus luteus.
Length. — About twelve inches.
Adult Male.— Brown above; a scarlet crescent across the nape of the neck; top
and back of head gray; back and wings barred with black; rump white;
quill feathers of wings and tail black above, golden-yellow below; shafts
of both wing and tail feathers yellow; throat pinkish-brown, running to
buff on the breast, sides, and belly, which are marked with round black
dots; a black crescent on breast, and a black patch on each side of head
just below gape.
Adult Female.— Similar, but without the black ‘‘ mustache.”
Nest.— A hole in a tree, from four to forty feet from the ground.
Eggs. — Glossy white. ;
Season. — Resident; not very common in winter except in southeastern Massa-
chusetts.
The Flicker, our largest and most common Woodpecker, is
well known, in some one or more of its various forms, over
the greater part of temperate America. It has over thirty
vernacular names, a few of the most common of which are
given above. A loud wick, wick, is the Flicker’s announce-
ment that spring has come. Its amorous wick!-er, wick’-er,
wick/-er, sounds from the orchards in early spring, as the male
birds play about in curious antics, each trying in friendly
rivalry to outdo the other in the display of his golden beauty,
that he may thus attract and hold the admiration of the
female. There is no fighting, but in its place an exhibition
of all the airs and graces that the rival dandies can muster.
Their extravagant, comical gestures, rapidly changing atti-
tudes, and exuberant cries, all seem laughable to the onlooker,
but evidently give pleasure to the birds. Their notes on
such occasions have considerable variety, and are all pleasing.
SONGLESS BIRDS OF ORCHARD AND WOODLAND. 261
This bird often beats a long roll on a resonant branch.
When flying away it is easily identified by the showy white
patch on the rump, and when it flies overhead its golden
wings and tail are plainly shown.
It is rather a shy bird, and it has reason to be, for, in
spite of the law protecting it, the Flicker is hunted in most
parts of its range. It is not a typical Woodpecker. Its
bill is slightly curved,
and its tongue has fewer
terminal barbs than any
other North American
species. But the tongue
is one of the longest, it
is studded on the upper
surface with fine points
directed backward, and
the salivary glands are
large; in fact, this bird
is more of an ant-eater
than a Woodpecker. It Fig. 118.— Flicker, male, about one-half natural
frequents fields, or- ios
chards, and open spaces in the woods, where it strikes its
long bill into anthills, and then thrusts out its still longer
tongue, coated with sticky saliva, and licks up the out-
rushing ants by the dozen. Ants constitute about forty-five
per cent. of its food. Though useful in some ways, ants are
often great pests. Many kinds are decidedly harmful, as
they attend, protect, and help to spread many aphids that
are known as plant, root, or bark lice, which are among
the greatest enemies of certain garden plants, shrubs, and
trees. Ants infest houses, destroy timber, and have other
harmful habits. They are eaten by many birds, of which
the Flicker heads the list. It also takes beetles, grasshop-
pers, crickets, caterpillars, and other harmful insects. It is
fond of wild cherries and wild berries, but takes very little
cultivated fruit. Grass seed and weed seed are eaten to
some extent. Occasionally it has been known to eat a little
corn on the ear. Its most harmful habit is exhibited in
southeastern Massachusetts, where, especially on Cape Cod,
262 USEFUL BIRDS.
it winters in considerable numbers, and there bores holes
into the summer cottages and finds winter shelter in the
rooms, where it sometimes does some damage by pecking
at the window sashes and curtains and in other ways. If
the owners of these cottages had put up a few cheap bird-
boxes on their buildings or trees, with entrances large
enough for the Flicker, the birds might have used the
boxes, and never have contracted the criminal habit of
breaking and entering.
Yellow-bellied Sapsucker.
Sphyrapicus varius.
Length. — About eight and one-half inches.
Adult Male.— Above, brownish or yellowish, marked with black and white;
below, yellowish ; sides black-streaked ; a broad white stripe from shoulder
along the black wing; crown and throat patch crimson; border of both
patches and line through eye black; a black breast patch ; belly yellowish.
Adult Female.— Similar, except that the throat patch is whitish, instead of
scarlet.
Nest and Eggs.— Much like those of other Woodpeckers.
Season. — Migrates north through the State in April, and south in September and
October; breeds rarely in Berkshire County.
There would be no justification for including this hand-
somely marked bird among the useful species of Massachu-
setts, except for the fact that in thirty years no instance
has come to my knowledge of its doing any appreciable
harm here. There can be no doubt that it has killed trees
in northern New England, where it breeds; but, as it does
some good while here by destroying insects, citizens of the
State can have no shadow of an excuse for destroying any
Woodpecker, for all the other species that visit this State
are more useful than this. The red crown and throat, and
the broad white stripe or patch on the black wing, will dis-
tinguish it from more useful species.
CUCKOOS, KINGFISHERS, ETC.
Kingfishers feed mainly on fish, but occasionally subsist
very largely on such insects as grasshoppers: These birds
are no doubt necessary to help maintain the balance of
nature whenever animals on which they feed tend to in-
crease beyond normal numbers. They are not of sufficient
SONGLESS BIRDS OF ORCHARD AND WOODLAND. 263
economic importance, however, to receive more than this
brief mention here. The Cuckoos, on the other hand, are
particularly useful. They have the reputation of laying their
eggs in other birds’ nests. This is true of the European
Cuckoo, which seems to be unable to complete her clutch
of eggs rapidly enough to incubate them in one batch;
therefore she leaves them to be hatched in the nests of other
birds. This is rarely true, however, of the American spe-
cies, which ordinarily build their own nests and hatch their
own eggs. Audubon and Nuttall accused Cuckoos of rob-
bing the nests of other birds, but there is little recent evi-
dence of this habit. Like Woodpeckers, Cuckoos have the
fourth toe reversed; but apparently the reversion of this toe
does not now assist them in climbing, even if it ever did,
for they do not climb like the Woodpeckers. They are
long, slender, rather shy, modestly colored, and sedentary
birds, which sit secluded among the leaves, and are heard
more than they are seen.
Black-billed Cuckoo. Rain Crow.
Coccyzus erythrophthalmus.
Length. — Nearly twelve inches.
Adult. — Above, olive-brown and gray, with lustrous bronzy reflections; below,
white; bill black ; small white tips to all but the two central tail feathers.
Nest. — Sticks loosely put together in a bush, vine, or low tree.
Eggs. — Greenish-blue.
Season. — May to September.
The Black-billed Cuckoo is common throughout most of
the State. It seeks the bushy borders of streams, ponds,
low woodlands, and swamps. It inhabits the glades of de-
ciduous woods, and sometimes nests in thickets, but often
visits orchards and fruit gardens. It isa bird of the trees
and shrubbery, rarely leaving the leafy shades except to feed
where caterpillars have defoliated the trees. Although some-
what sedentary, it flies rapidly and gracefully, but usually
at no great height. Upon alighting in a bush or a tree it
generally chooses a sheltered or hidden position, and, relying
perhaps upon its close resemblance to the color of the foliage,
it often may be closely approached.
Its notes vary much, but consist commonly of the syllable
264 USEFUL BIRDS.
cow, cow, repeated monotonously many times, and sometimes
preceded by a short chuckle. The bird often calls at night,
and toward autumn its notes may sometimes be heard in the
air as it passes overhead, probably in migration. Usually
when the bird is heard at
night in the spring and early
summer it appears to be
stationary. There is some
mystery in the wakefulness and
night flight of Cuckoos, for they are
certainly as wide-awake at times as the
: Owl or Whip-poor-will at night, and often
Fig. 119.—Black-
billed Cuckoo, one. Seem slow and sleepy by day.
eee The Cuckoos are of the greatest service
to the farmer, by reason of their well-known fondness for
caterpillars, particularly the hairy species. No caterpillars
are safe from the Cuckoo. It does not matter how hairy or
spiny they are, or how well they
may be protected by webs. Often
the stomach of the Cuckoo will be
found lined with a felted mass of
caterpillar hairs, and sometimes Fig. 120.—Caterpillar of the Io
its intestines are pierced by the aul
spines of the noxious caterpillars that it has swallowed.
Wherever caterpillar outbreaks occur we hear the calls of
the Cuckoos. There they stay; there they bring their
newly fledged young; and the number of caterpillars they
eat is incredible. Professor Beal states that two thousand,
seven hundred and seventy-one
caterpillars were found in the
stomachs of one hundred and
twenty-one Cuckoos, —an aver-
Fig. 121.—Spiny elm caterpillar. aoe of more than twenty-one each.
Dr. Otto Lugger found several hundred small hairy cater-
pillars in the stomach of a single bird. The poisonous,
spined caterpillars of the Io moth, the almost equally dis-
agreeable caterpillars of the brown-tail moth, and the spiny
elm caterpillar, are eaten with avidity.
While the above statements may apply to either of our
SONGLESS BIRDS OF ORCHARD AND WOODLAND. 265
Cuckoos, the Black-billed Cuckoo is the more common in
Massachusetts, and is therefore probably the more useful.
Grasshoppers, locusts, and other insects are often eaten, but
practically no cultivated fruit and no grain.
Yellow-billed Cuckoo.
Coceyzus americanus.
Length. — About twelve inches.
Adult.— Bill black above, yellow beneath; upper parts olive-brown, with gray
tints and metallic lusters; under parts white; a bright cinnamon tint on
wings; two inner tail feathers olive; outer tail feathers blackish, two with
white outer edge; all but two inner tail feathers broadly tipped with white.
Nest. — A loose mass of sticks, in a bush or tree.
Eggs.— Usually larger and lighter colored than those of the preceding species.
Season. — May to September.
This bird is long and slender, but it is a little larger and
more robust in appearance than the Black-billed Cuckoo. A
near view will show the yellow of the under mandible and
Fig. 122.—The fall web worm, The caterpillars (a, b, c) are eaten by Cuckoos.
the characteristic markings of the tail, which serve to distin-
guish the bird in the field. Moreover, the notes of this
species are heavier and coarser than those of the Black-billed
Cuckoo. Schuyler Mathews well describes a characteristic
ery of this bird as Gr-r-r-olp, cowlp, cowlp-olp-olp. All this
is delivered with little if any variation in tone, and ina voice
seemingly as deep as that of a Heron.
266 USEFUL BIRDS.
The Yellow-billed Cuckoo is common in eastern Massa-
chusetts, although it is rather more local than the preced-
ing species; but it is rare in the highlands of the northern
and western counties. Mrs. Mabel Osgood Wright states
that this bird “seemed to follow an epidemic of tent worms”
into Connecticut, and that it was abundant for two years in
orchards and gardens containing fruit trees. She asserts that
it did its work so thoroughly that orchards which were cov-
ered with caterpillar webs yielded a good crop later. She says
also that the Cuckoos destroy many more than they can eat,
by tearing the webs apart and squeezing the worms with
their beaks. This is corroborated by the statements of
gentlemen from Medford, who have told me that they have
often observed this habit of the Cuckoo as practised on cater-
pillars of the gipsy moth and the brown-tail moth. It is
said that these Cuckoos, which were formerly decreasing in
numbers around Boston, are now increasing. They are no
doubt attracted by the abundant caterpillars. This species
is apparently the greatest enemy to these pests.
GROUSE, PARTRIDGES, ETC.
This family of gallinaceous birds is represented in Mas-
sachusetts by four species. Of these, the Spruce Grouse
is merely an accidental visitor; the Heath Hen is nearing
extermination ; and the Bob-white, now rare or wanting in
many parts of the State, is more a bird of the field and
garden than of the orchard or woodland. It is described on
p- 325. This leaves only one species, the Ruffed Grouse,
to be considered here, as the other species, introduced from
time to time from other parts of the country, soon die out
or are killed off by our arms-bearing population. This is
particularly unfortunate, for Massachusetts, with her rocky,
wooded hills, sandy plains, and fertile valleys, her stunted
shrubby growths on Cape Cod and Martha’s Vineyard, and
her many fertile fields, is naturally a paradise for Grouse in
summer, and produces an abundant winter food supply for
these hardy birds.
PLATE XXI.— Ruffed Grouse on Nest. (Photograph from life.)
(From American Ornithology.)
SONGLESS BIRDS UF ORCHARD AND WUODLAND. 267
Ruffed Grouse. Partridge.
Bonasa umbellus.
Length. — Sixteen to eighteen inches.
Adult Male.— Upper parts reddish or yellowish brown, varying to gray; many
markings; head crested; large ruffs of glossy black feathers on the
sides of the neck; tail long and broad, varying from reddish-brown to
gray, mottled and barred with lighter and darker shades; a broad black-
ish band near the tip; under parts tinged with buff, strongest on throat,
barred and otherwise marked with darker shades, particularly on breast
and sides.
Adult Female.— Similar, but smaller; ruffs also smaller.
Nest.— Lined with leaves, on ground in woods.
Eggs. — Buffy or yellowish white, sometimes speckled with a darker color.
This common bird, the “king of American game birds,”
was abundant in all our woods and was often seen in fields
and orchards until its numbers were decimated by the gunner
and the survivors driven to the cover of the pines. The
characteristic startling roar of its wings, with which it starts
away when flushed from the ground, and its habit of drum-
ming on a log, have been often described. The speed with
which the wings are beaten in drumming makes it impossible
for the human eye to. follow them, and make sure whether
they strike anything or not. Naturalists, after long discus-
sion, had come to believe that the so-called drumming of the
Ruffed Grouse was caused by the bird beating the air with
its wings, as described by Mr. William Brewster; but now
comes Dr. C. F. Hodge, and reopens the controversy by
exhibiting a series of photographs which seem to show that
the bird in drumming strikes the contour feathers of the
body. Strange as it may seem, there are many people who
often take outings in the country, yet have never heard the
drumming of this bird. This tattoo is most common in late
winter and early spring, but may be heard occasionally in
summer and not uncommonly in fall. While sounded oftenest
during the day, it may fall on the ear at any hour of the
night. In making it the bird usually stands very erect on a
hollow log or stump, with head held high and ruffs erected
and spread, and, raising its wings, strikes downward and
forward. The sound produced is a muffled boom or thump.
It begins with a few slow beats, growing gradually quicker,
268 USEFUL BIRDS.
and ends in a rolling, accelerated tattoo. It has a ventrilo-
quial property. Sometimes when one is very close to the
bird the drumming seems almost soundless; at other times
it seems much louder at a distance, as if through some prin-
ciple of acoustics it were most distinctly audible at a certain
radius from the bird. It is the bird’s best expression of its
abounding vigor and virility, and signifies that the drummer
is ready for love or war.
The female alone undertakes the task of incubation and
the care of the young. Once, however, when I came upon
a young brood, the agonized cry of the distressed mother
attracted a fine cock bird. He raised all his feathers, and,
with ruffs and tail spread, strutted up to within a rod of
my position, seemingly almost as much concerned as the
female, but not coming quite so near. The hen sometimes
struts toward the intruder in a similar manner when sur-
prised while with her young. She can raise her ruffs and
strut exactly like the cock.
The Grouse has so many enemies that it seems remarkable
how it can escape them, nesting, as it does, on the ground.
Instances are on record, however, where birds that probably
have been much persecuted have learned to deposit their
eggs in old nests of Hawks or Crows, in tall trees. When-
ever the mother bird leaves the nest the eggs are easily seen,
and while she sits it would seem impossible for her where-
abouts to remain a secret to the keen-scented prowlers of the
woods. But her colors blend so perfectly with those of the
dead leaves on the forest floor, and she sits so closely and
remains so motionless among the shadows, that she escapes
the sharp-eyed Hawk. She gives out so little scent that the
dog, skunk, or fox often passes quite near, unnoticing.
The Grouse does not naturally fear man ; more than once
in the wilderness of the northwest a single bird has walked
up to within a few feet of me. They will sit on limbs
just above one’s head, almost within reach, and regard one
curiously, but without much alarm. Usually in Massachu-
setts when a human being comes near the nest. the mother
bird whirs loudly away. She has well learned the fear of
man ; but ina place where no shooting was permitted, a large
PLATE XXII.— Ruffed Grouse, One Day old. (Photograph,
from life, by C. F. Hodge.) (From the annual report of the
Massachusetts Commissioners on Fisheries and Game, 1905.)
<<
PLATE XXIII:— Ruffed Grouse, Four Months old. (Photograph,
from life, by C. F. Hodge.) (From the annual report of the Massa-
chusetts Commissioners on Fisheries and Game, 1905.)
SONGLESS BIRDS OF ORCHARD AND WOODLAND. 269
gang of men were cutting underbrush, while a Partridge
sitting there remained quietly on her nest as the men worked
noisily all about her. Another bird that nested beside a
woods road, along which I walked daily, at first would fly
before I had come within a rod of her; but later she became
confiding enough to sit on her nest while six persons passed
close beside her. Evidently the bird’s facility in concealing
her nest consists in sitting close and keeping her eggs well
covered. Her apparent faith in her invisibility is overcome
only by her fear of man or her dread of the fox. When the
fox is seen approaching directly toward her she bristles up
and flies at him, in the attempt to frighten him with the
sudden roar of her wings and the impetuosity of her attack ;
but Reynard, although at first taken aback, cannot always
be deceived by such tricks ; and the poor bird, in her anxiety
to defend her nest, only betrays its whereabouts. Probably,
however, the fox rarely finds her nest unless he happens to
blunder directly into it.
Dr. C. F. Hodge made some interesting experiments with
two trained bird dogs, a pointer and a setter, neither of
which could find a Partridge as she sat quietly on her nest.
The theory often used to explain this is, that the bird, being
frightened, sits with her feathers drawn close to her body,
and so “holds her scent.” This is a matter, however, that
should be investigated with scientific accuracy ; for, in spite
of all theories, the manner in which the bird escapes dis-
covery still remains a mystery. The protection, whatever
it is, is not always infallible, for occasionally a fox or dog
discovers the sitting bird apparently by scent. Mr. William
Brewster tells me that one of his dogs once found a Wood-
cock on her nest. All the young Grouse in a nest hatch at
nearly the same instant, their feathers dry very rapidly, and
they are soon ready to run about. When able to travel,
they leave the nest, and from that moment they become wan-
derers on the face of the earth. It is often asserted that the
Partridge leads her brood about after the manner of a Hen
with her Chickens. This may be true in some cases; but
I think the young birds usually scatter and forage mainly
for themselves. They run about, stealing noiselessly along
270 USEFUL BIRDS.
among the dead leaves, under the foliage of ferns and shrub-
bery, continually taking insects from leaf, stem, and frond,
or picking them from the ground. Meanwhile, the mother
marches slowly in their rear, perhaps to guard them against
surprise from any keen-scented animal that may follow on
the trail. She seems to be almost always on the alert, and
a single warning note from her will cause the young birds to
flatten themselves on the ground or to hide under leaves,
where they will often remain motionless until they are
trodden upon, rather than run the risk of betraying them-
selves by attempting to escape. For this reason any one
who disturbs a Partridge with her brood should be very care-
ful not to approach too closely, lest he tread on the young
birds. When, as sometimes happens, the intruder has taken
the mother unawares, and approached close to her tender
brood, she seems nearly distracted in her anxiety, and, scream-
ing, flies directly at her enemy. The sound she makes at
such times has been likened to the whine of a young puppy ;
but to my mind her first cry more nearly resembles the
squeal a rabbit gives when startled in the moonlit woods.
When thus surprised the young may be seen for a brief
moment as they run or fly, seeking a safe hiding-place,
while the mother attempts to lead their pursuer away by
feigning lameness and fluttering along the ground. Should
this transparent ruse succeed, she then flies off as well as
ever, and remains away until she believes all danger has
passed, when she quietly returns and calls her brood. Evi-
dently even the sharp-nosed fox finds it hard to detect the
little birds so long as they lie quiet, and they seem to leave
little or no scent as they run rapidly over the dry leaves.
Some keen-eyed Hawk occasionally gets one, and they some-
times succumb to a disease aggravated by exposure to heavy,
continuous rains. Woodticks and lice together are said to
be fatal to them, and a species of botfly is said to attack
them; but under ordinary conditions about half of each
brood comes to maturity.
The wing quills grow very fast, and before many days
have passed the little chicks can fly short distances. Audu-
bon says he has seen them fly a few feet when but six or
CO6T ‘OUIBE) PUB SOLIOYSIY WO SIOTOISSTUIMOD SyosSNYEssBIY VY} FO
qlodar yenuus oy} Worg) (CoespoH A ‘O Aq ‘ost Woaz ‘ydeiSoj0yg) -Suninns ‘osnoip payny—‘AIXX WLW Id
SONGLESS BIRDS OF ORCHARD AND WOODLAND. 271
seven days old. I saw a single bird about three weeks old
start from a hilltop with its mother, and, ascending among
the tree tops, fly into a hollow more than a hundred yards
away. Prof. C. F. Hodge told me that a three-weeks chick
which he was rearing became frightened one day, and dis-
appeared over the trees; an hour later it flew back.
During the fall, the Grouse keep together in small flocks.
Sometimes a dozen birds may be found around some favorite
grape vine or apple tree, but they are usually so harried and
scattered by gunners that toward winter the old birds may
sometimes be found alone.
As winter approaches, this hardy bird puts on its “ snow-
shoes,” which consist of a fringe of horny processes or pecti-
nations that grow out along each toe, and help to distribute
the weight of the bird over a larger surface, and so allow it
to walk over snows into which a bird not so provided would
sink deeply. Its digestion must resemble that of the famous
Ostrich, as broken twigs and dry leaves are ground up in its
mill. It is a hard winter that will starve the Grouse. A
pair spent many winter nights in a little cave in the rocky
wall of an old quarry. Sumacs grew there, and many rank
weeds. The birds lived well on sumac berries, weed seeds,
and buds.
‘Sometimes, but perhaps rarely, these birds are imprisoned
under the snow by the icy crust which forms in cold weather
following a rain, but usually they are vigorous enough to
find a way out somewhere. The Grouse is perfectly at home
beneath the snow ; it will dive into it to escape a Hawk, and
can move rapidly about beneath the surface and burst out
again in rapid flight at some unexpected place.
The Ruffed Grouse is a bird of the woodland, and, though
useful in the woods, it sometimes does some injury in the
orchard by removing too many buds from a single tree. In
winter and early spring, when other food is buried by the
snow and hard to obtain, the Grouse lives largely on the buds
and green twigs of trees; but as spring advances, insects
form a considerable part of the food. The young feed very
largely on insects, including many very destructive species.
While I have often observed the young birds feeding on
272 USEFUL BIRDS.
insects, it was usually impossible to make out just what those
insects were; but in confinement the young are very fond
of flies, maggots, beetles, slugs, thrips, plant lice of various
kinds, and spiders. Professor Forbes found mostly insects
in the stomachs of three birds about three days old. They
had eaten cutworms, grasshoppers, Lampyrid beetles, ants,
parasitic wasps, buffalo tree hoppers, and spiders. Professor
King found that a Grouse about a week out of the shell had
eaten a white grub, seven spiders, and thirteen caterpillars.
I found in July the remains of a young bird that had been
killed by a Hawk; it must have been at least six weeks old.
Its stomach contained beetles and the seeds of weeds. The
young are often found in grassy fields and pastures near
woods. I have seen them apparently catching grasshoppers,
crickets, and other grass-eating insects in such localities, and
they seem as fond of such food as are young Chickens.
Whenever such insects are plentiful, they form a part of the
summer food of the birds. Young Grouse evidently are very
useful as insect eaters, but as they grow older they depend
more upon vegetable food. Dr. Judd, who has given the
best account of the food of the Grouse, says that at Chocorua,
N. H., in September, 1898, they were feeding very largely
on the red-legged grasshopper or locust (Melanoplus femur-
rubrum), avery destructive insect. Seven adult birds, killed
in the breeding season, had eaten insects to the amount of
thirty per cent. of their food.
The Ruffed Grouse at times eats many caterpillars, par-
ticularly those species which, like the cutworms and army
worms, live largely upon the ground.
It seems probable also that it takes
caterpillars from the trees, as num-
Fig. 123.—Red-humped bers of red-humped apple caterpillars
caterpillar. 5 . .
(Schizura concinna) and oak caterpil-
lars (Symmerista albifrons) have been found in its stomach.
Dr. Judd says that the Grouse prefers beetles to other insects.
This seems to be true of the young also, although when first
hatched they appear to relish softer-bodied insects more.
The old birds are persistent scratchers, and unearth many
ground beetles, which they eat greedily. They sometimes
SONGLESS BIRDS OF ORCHARD AND WOODLAND. 273
feed on the potato beetle and otlier very injurious leaf-eating
beetles, including flea beetles, grape-vine beetles, and May
beetles: Also, they take wood-boring beetles, which they
find mainly about stumps and fallen trees.
Ants are eaten, and bugs, including leaf
hoppers and tree hoppers. Many birds eat af
gall insects, but the Grouse eats them galls
and all. Besides the insects taken, it eats Fig. 124.—‘Tree
a few spiders and small snails. i
Although Grouse eat largely of insects during spring and
summer, this habit has not been much noticed, chiefly be-
cause most of the birds whose stomachs have been examined
were shot in the late fall or in the winter months, when the
food is almost entirely vegetable. “The Ruffed Grouse,”
says Dr. Judd, “spends most of its feeding time in browsing
and berry picking.” In the fall, winter, and early spring,
seeds, berries, buds, leaves, and even twigs, form its prin-
cipal food. A great deal of this material is eaten through-
out the year wherever it can be obtained. Dr. Judd gives
the percentage of “browse” eaten as forty-eight and eleven
hundredths of its entire food for the season, and the per-
centage of berries as twenty-eight and thirty-two hundredths.
Buds form twenty per cent. of its food for the year. The
seeds eaten are mainly tree seed, and those of such weeds
as grow in clearings, along walls and fences, or on the
borders of woods. Grain is very rarely taken. A partial
list of the vegetable food of the Grouse is given below.
It is largely compiled from the bulletin by Dr. Judd on the
Grouse and Wild Turkeys of the United States, which is
the most complete list yet published.
Nuts or Seeds.
Hazelnuts, beechnuts, chestnuts, acorns. Seeds of tick trefoil, horn-
beam, vetch, hemlock, pitch pine, maple, blackberry lily, beggar’s
ticks, chickweed, sheep sorrel, sedges, violet, witch-hazel, beech drops,
avens, persicaria, frost weed, jewel weed.
Buds, Blossoms, or Foliage.
Of poplar, birch, willow, apple, pear, peach, alder, hazel, beech,
ironwood, hornbeam, blackberry, blueberry, spruce, arbor vite, May-
flower, laurel, maple, spicebush, partridge berry, sheep sorrel, aster,
274 USEFUL BIRDS.
green ovary of bloodroot, clover, purslane, wood sorrel, yellow sorrel,
heuchera, chickweed, catnip, cinquefoil, buttercup, speedwell, saxi-
frage, live-forever, meadow rue, smilax, horsetail rush, azalea, false
goat’s beard, dandelion, cudweed.
Fruit.
Rose hips, grapes, smooth sumac, dwarf sumac, staghorn sumac,
scarlet sumac, poison ivy, partridge berry, thorn apple, cockspur
thorn, scarlet thorn, mountain ash, wintergreen, bayberry, blackberry,
huckleberry, blueberry, cranberry, sarsaparilla berries, greenbrier,
hairy Solomon’s seal, smooth Solomon’s seal, black raspberry, rasp-
berry, domestic cherry, cultivated plum, wild black cherry, wild red
cherry, elder, red. elder, black haw, nannyberry, withe rod, maple-
leaved arrow wood, high-bush cranberry, mountain cranberry, snow-
berry, feverwort, black huckleberry, black alder, flowering dogwood,
bunchberry, cornel, silky cornel, pepperidge, mulberry, bittersweet,
manzanita, barberry, Virginia creeper.
By saving or propagating the plants in this list, some-
thing may be done toward increasing the numbers of this
persecuted game bird.
UTILITY OF BIRDS IN FIELD AND GARDEN. 275
CHAPTER VII.
THE UTILITY OF BIRDS IN FIELD AND GARDEN,
In the grass field or meadow, as in the wood lot, natural
conditions are simulated. Each year until haying time the
grass offers cover and shelter for the nests of such birds
as breed on the ground in natural meadows, savannas, or
prairies. The grass and other plants of the field also pro-
vide food for birds, and for insects on which birds feed. As
in woodlands, there is established a natural interdependence
between the bird and its food and shelter, — the insects and
the grass.
The habits of birds that live in fields have become ad-
justed to those of the native insects which also live there,
so that the abundance of these insects is largely controlled
by these birds, while the abundance of the birds is regulated
chiefly by the rise and fall of the insects on which they feed.
Some of the most useful birds of the farm live and breed in
the fields; others breed along walls and fences. Early cut-
ting of the grass on fields and meadows reduces the num-
ber of birds that breed there, for it destroys their nests or
takes away the shelter of the grass from their young; but
it also checks the grass insects, and exposes them to attacks
from Robins, Crows, and other birds that nest in woodland
or orchard, but prefer to feed in the field.
When, for any reason, the numbers of birds in the field
are insufficient, insects increase ; but in such cases the field
birds are assisted in their work by birds of shore, swamp,
orchard, and woodland. A similar service is often recipro-
cated to orchard or woodland by the birds of the fields,
many of which flock to the trees to quell outbreaks of cat-
erpillars or other tree pests.
Grasshoppers, army worms, cutworms, and the grubs of
May beetles are among the most destructive insect enemies
of the grasses of this State. Nearly all field birds feed upon
276 USEFUL BIRDS.
such insects. Without birds it is doubtful if crops of grass
could be raised; for the grub of a single species of beetle,
if unchecked, could readily destroy all the grass roots of
our meadows; and any one of several species of cutworms
or army worms might be sufficient to destroy all the crops
above ground. As it is, however, where the birds of the
field are undisturbed they tend to hold the grass insects in
check, so that the farmers are able to get good crops of
grass without using any insecticides whatever. Therefore,
we are largely indebted to birds for our grass crop.
Wherever the numbers of birds are much reduced, there
is danger of a corresponding reduction in the grass yield.
Prof. J. Y. P. Jenks: once told of an experience related to
him regarding an occurrence many years ago in Bridgewater,
Mass. A great hunt was held by the townspeople in the
spring of the year, and so many birds were killed that their
bodies were used to fertilize the soil. The following sum-
mer the trees in that town were stripped of their leaves, and
great patches of grass withered away and died. Such results
must be expected wherever the number of birds in a region
is suddenly and greatly reduced, and the pressure exerted by
them upon the hosts of insects is as suddenly released.
In preparing the garden or cultivated field, natural condi-
tions are overturned. If in making a garden we desire to
use a piece of land covered with trees, we must first clear it.
By cutting trees and uprooting and burning stumps and
underbrush we remove the natural shelter and nesting places
for birds, and to a great extent destroy their food. Some
woodland insects may persist, and later attack the growing
crops; but the birds which formerly lived in the woods are
driven away.
If the land intended for our garden be natural meadow or
prairie, we must dispose of the grass, and so the sod is turned
under. As in the woodland, both the shelter and nesting
places of the birds are destroyed, together with most of
their food. Such insects as pass part of their lives in the
ground, like the white grubs and cutworms, may survive and
eventually come to live on the fruits of our labors; but the
birds are driven out.
UTILITY OF BIRDS IN FIELD AND GARDEN. 277
Usually there is no nesting place in the garden for tree-
breeding birds, and the operations of tillage and weeding
make nesting unsafe and impracticable for the ground birds.
Where tillage is not very frequent or strenuous, a few birds
may nest in the garden. There was a time when Sparrows
frequently built their nests in potato hills, and Sandpipers
reared their young in cornfields ; but more intensive cultiva-
tion has driven them out. Birds now rarely breed in culti-
vated fields or gardens, except where trees, bushes, or vines
furnish them nesting places ; but the farmer prefers to have
no trees in the garden, as they interfere with the cultivation
of other plants, and so the birds are kept out. We have,
therefore, practically no garden birds, and the service that
we get from birds in the garden must be rendered by those
which come there from woodland, orchard, swamp, field, or
meadow, or those which, like the Swallows and Swifts, fly
over the garden and take insects in the air.
But if a bird comes into the garden, it is often regarded
with suspicion; and if it takes a few peas, strawberries, or
a little corn, it is fortunate to escape with its life. All
services the bird has rendered or may render are lost sight
of in view of the fact that it has taken some of the fruits of
man’s toil. We can feed our cattle, our hogs, a vagabond
homeless cat, a stray dog, or a tramp; but if a bird claims
any of our bounty, capital punishment is not too severe
for it.
The garden has become a paradise for insects. Here they
find the most succulent food plants, finely developed, and
grown in patches or masses, — often by the acre. Abundant
opportunity is thus offered for the increase and spread of
insects which confine themselves to a few food plants. In-
sects leave the wild plants on which they formerly fed, and
gather to the feast in the garden. They increase in numbers ;
they multiply a thousand fold. The few birds that now ven-
ture into the garden select such insects as they like best, and
the rest run riot among the crops.
Partly for the foregoing reasons, and partly because some
of the most important garden pests have nauseous or poison-
ous secretions and are eaten by few birds, we get much less
A
278 USEFUL BIRDS.
assistance from birds in our gardens than in our woodlands
or tields. Nevertheless, the few species that follow the
plow and glean among the various vegetables are of the ut-
most value to the farmer, who in the ordinary course must
depend largely on them to protect his crops from certain
insects that are difficult of control. Cutworms, army worms,
and cabbage worms are a few of the garden pests which are
eaten by birds, and which birds might control if sufficiently
numerous. The squash bug and the Colorado potato beetle
are two insects which are seldom eaten, or by but few birds.
Many of the birds of garden and field may be brought to
assist the farmer in his battle against weeds. A weed is a
useful plant in nature, and fulfils its purpose by filling bar-
ren or unoccupied soil with roots, preventing a waste of that
most valuable fertilizing constituent, nitrogen, and adding,
by its decay, to the amount of humus and plant food in the
soil. In the garden and field, however, these wild plants
are out of place, for the farmer wishes to cultivate the
corn, the bean, the potato, or other useful plants and various
grasses, all of which, if left to themselves, may be dwarfed,
stifled, or replaced by a vigorous growth of weeds, which
spring up unbidden from the soil.
Dr. Judd tells us that a single plant of one species of
weed may mature as many as a hundred thousand seeds in
a season; and if these were unchecked, they might in the
third year produce ten million plants. In competition with
this bewildering multiplication, the corn or the bean, the
wheat or the rye, with their comparatively few seeds, must
soon succumb.
Constant use of the cultivator and hoe will do much to
eradicate weeds from cultivated land, but they are always
present in the grass field; and, as most of the grass is cut
after the seeds have ripened, and fed to farm animals, there
are always weed seeds present in the manure which is used
in garden and field. Thus the farmer annually sows weed
seed in his cultivated land.
Even when the garden is kept clear of weeds, there are
still weeds around the edges of fields and gardens, and along
roadsides, ditches, and hedgerows, which continually seed
UTILITY OF BIRDS IN FIELD AND GARDEN. 279
down the near-by land. Most land is full of weed seed,
which retains its vitality for from five to seven years, so that
weeds always spring up at once and spread rapidly in lands
that are uncared for. The life of the gardener is a perpetual
warfare against weeds. In this fight many birds of the field
may be of some assistance against the weeds which annually
spring up, flourish, and die, and therefore are dependent on
seed alone to perpetuate their species. A goodly number of
the birds of the field feed largely on the seeds of such weeds,
and many of them subsist almost entirely on weed seeds
during the fall, winter, and early spring. The quantity of
such seeds annually eaten by birds in Massachusetts is be-
yond computation. Where seed-eating birds are numerous,
they get nearly all the seeds of certain weeds; and if the
farmer takes pains to attract and protect them, they may be
of great assistance to him in the problem of weed destruc-
tion. Their benefits are greatest among hoed crops, for in
such fields the largest number of weeds find opportunity for
growth.
Dr. Judd says that the principal weeds which birds prevent
from seeding are ragweed, pigeon grass, smartweed, bind-
weed, crab grass, lamb’s quarters, and pigweed; but these
are only a few of the seeds eaten by birds, as will be seen
later. During cold weather many of the birds about the
farm gorge themselves with the seeds of weeds, filling stom-
ach and gullet almost to the throat. Some species feed
in weedy gardens and fields; others are found more along
the roadsides and the edges of thickets or woodlands ; while
still others, like the Snowflake and the Meadow Lark, seek
open fields by preference. As a single Snowflake can eat
a thousand seeds of pigweed at a meal, the effect produced
upon a weedy field by a flock of one hundred or two hundred
birds is very marked. They alight among the weeds, and as
fast as each bird exhausts its part of the supply it rises and
flies over the flock to the untouched weeds beyond; and so
the flock rolls along, until perchance the birds have stripped
the seed from practically all the exposed weeds in the field.
The various species of birds have different feeding habits.
Goldfinches, Pine Finches, and Crossbills, for instance, cling
280 USEFUL BIRDS.
to the weeds and take the seeds from the stalks; while Song
Sparrows and Chipping Sparrows subsist largely on such
seeds as they can find on, or reach from, the ground. Song
Sparrows, Fox Sparrows, and Tree Sparrows are persistent
scratchers, and dig out seed that -has already fallen, and is
buried by dead leaves, straw, earth, or other litter. Meadow
Larks and Quail are useful in digging out seed from the
ground, which, already buried, would otherwise spring up
and grow. When the snow is deep, a large proportion of
the seed-eaters must of necessity go south; but as soon as
the ground is bare, they return to scratch and dig for their
favorite food. Thus, as various species of differing habits
and different haunts frequent the fields and their borders, and
as the work of one supplements that of another, they exert
together a constant repressive influence against the undue
multiplication of weeds. The birds most actively employed
in consuming weed seed in field and garden are Sparrows
and Finches, Blackbirds, Cowbirds, Meadowlarks, Doves,
and Quail.
Dr. Judd found about five hundred and twenty-five birds
eating weed seed from a single acre of truck land on a Mary-
land farm, and estimated that they destroyed forty-six thou-
sand seeds for their breakfast. About the last of April he
attempted to learn what proportion of the weed seed on the
place had been destroyed by birds during the fall and winter.
In a wheat: field where ragweed was plentiful it was difficult
to find half a dozen seeds in a fifteen-minute search. Ina
growth of pigeon grass the examination of an area where
there had been hundreds of seeds the year before would
sometimes fail to disclose one ; and in some crab grass in the
same field not one seed out of a thousand was left.
The following list of seeds eaten by birds, taken from Dr.
Judd’s interesting account of the “Birds of a Maryland
Farm,” will serve to indicate the habits of the same birds in
Massachusetts. It will be noted that most of the weeds in
this list are common here, and some of them are very abun-
dant, widespread, and troublesome. Chickweed seeds ma-
ture very quickly, and purslane has to be dug up and carried
out of the field, else it will persist in spite of the gardener.
UTILITY OF BIRDS IN FIELD AND GARDEN.
281
Noxious Seeds eaten by Birds.
Bull thistle (Carduus lanceolatus).
Beggar’s ticks (Bidens frondosa).
Sneezeweed (Helenium autum-
nale).
Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisie-
folia).
Giant ragweed (Ambrosia trijida).
Sow thistle (Sonchus oleraceus).
Dandelion (Taraxacum taraxa-
cum).
Wild lettuce (Lactuca spicata).
Black bindweed (Polygonum con-
volvulus).
Pennsylvania persicaria (Polygo-
num pennsylvanicum) .
Knotweed (Polygonum aviculare).
Climbing false buckwheat (Polyg-
onum scandens).
Bitter dock (Rumex obtusifolius) .
Curled dock (Rumezx crispus).
Sheep sorrel (Rumex acetosella).
Crab grass (Panicum sanguinale) .
Pigeon grass (Chelochloa glauca).
Green foxtail grass (Chetochloa
viridis) .
Broom-sedge (Andropogon virgin-
icus).
Sheathed rush-grass (Sporobulus
vagine-florus).
Poverty grass (Aristida sp.).
Yard grass (Hleusine indica).
Bermuda grass (Capriola dacty-
lon).
Paspalum (Paspalum sp.).
Sedge (Cyperus).
Sassafras (Sassafras sassafras).
Blackberry (Rubus villosus).
Pokeberry (Phytolacca decandra).
Partridge pea (Cassia chame-
crisia).
Sweet clover (Melilotus alba).
Tick-trefoil (Meibomia nudiflora).
Snowdrops (Kneiffia fruiticosa).
Chickweed (Alsine media).
Amaranth (Amaranthus
Jlexus).
Trumpet creeper (Tecoma radi-
cans).
Yellow sorrel (Oxalis stricta).
Rib-grass (Planiago lanceolata).
Spurge (Huphorbia maculata).
Lamb’s quarters (Chenopodium
album) .
Purslane (Portulaca oleracea).
Jewel weed (Impatiens).
retro-
282 USEFUL BIRDS.
CHAPTER VIIL
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN.
THRUSHES AND THEIR ALLIES.
The food of Thrushes is alluded to on p. 155, and the
woodland Thrushes are described on the pages following it.
American Robin.
Merula migratoria.
Length. — Nine to ten inches.
Adult Male.— Above, dark gray, olive tinged, browner on wings; head and tail
blackish, with white marks; breast ruddy, varying to bay; chin and lower
tail coverts white; throat white, with black spots.
Adult Female. — Similar, but duller; head and breast paler.
Young.— Breast spotted with blackish.
Nest.— Of grass and mud, on tree, wall, building, or bank.
Eggs.— Greenish-blue ; rarely spotted.
Season. — Resident, but rarest in late December and early January.
This large Thrush was named the Robin by the early
settlers of Massachusetts, because it resembled somewhat in
color the little Red-breasted Robin of England. Ornithol-
ogists since then have called it
the Migratory Thrush and the Red-
breasted Thrush, but in vain; thus
custom perpetuates error.
The American Robin, as it is
now called, is the most generally
common bird in Massachusetts. Its
Fig. 125.— American Robin, habit of foraging on the ground in
About one-half natural size. wardens and fields, its fondness for
fruit, its custom of seeking the vicinity of human dwellings,
lawns, gardens, and cultivated fields, all have resulted in its
increasing in numbers. As the forests were cleared away,
the planting of fruit trees furnished it food and nesting
places ; and so the Robin became part and parcel of our rural
civilization. It nests by preference in an apple tree near
farm buildings, but almost any nesting site will do, from a
PLATE XXV.— Robin’s Nest in Hollow Tree.
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 283
pine tree in the woods to a wall overgrown with ivy, an over-
hanging sand bank, or a shelf over a cottage door. The nest
is usually strengthened with mud, but not always. Last sum-
mer I found in a sand bank a nest that had no mud in its com-
position. It needed none, for it was sunk in the sand and
sheltered overhead by the overhanging turf. Apparently the
birds were wise enough to see that in this case the mud was
unnecessary. The Robin sometimes utilizes a hollow trunk
for its nesting place, as may be seen by the accompanying
cut, made from a photograph furnished by Mr. J. A. Farley.
The Robin prefers to have a roof over its nest; therefore
it usually places the nest in such a situation that the growing
leaves will shade it from the sun and shelter it from the rain 3
but it often takes refuge under some roof built by human
hands. Last summer I saw a Robin’s nest built under the
projecting roof of a small, open railway station. There the
birds reared young, undisturbed by passengers or trains.
The economic position of the Robin has been discussed
almost as freely as that of the English Sparrow or the Crow.
Many fruit growers have long looked upon the Robin as an
inveterate enemy, and it cannot be denied that this bird is
sometimes a serious pest to the grower of small fruits. It
is often asserted that the Robin and Catbird select the very
choicest fruits. Professor Beal, however, believes that this
is an error, and that the birds rather prefer wild fruit that is
insipid or disagreeable to man.
My experience with birds in the strawberry bed con-
vinced me, nevertheless, that Robin and Catbird picked out
the reddest, ripest, and sweetest varieties in preference to all
others. To test this preference, I set out here and there a
plant of one of these varieties among the beds of more com-
mon fruit. In every case the birds found these plants and
took about all the fruit. But I am led to believe, from what
is known of their habits, that they selected this fruit by its
color rather than by its taste or quality. When the early
cherries are ripening, the birds attack the first point where a
cherry turns red. The choice early fruit is taken because
there is no ripe wild fruit, and at this season the birds have
had no juicy berries for months, and are “ fruit hungry.”
284 USEFUL BIRDS.
The destruction of small fruits by Robins usually bears
hardest on small growers, or on families who raise only a
little fruit for their own use. Large strawberry growers have
told me that the birds do them no noticeable harm, nor have
I known of any very serious and widespread destruction of
cultivated fruit by Robins in this State. Much harm is said
to have been done by them in other States, however, notably
in New Jersey and California.
Notwithstanding the fact that the Robin is sometimes in-
jurious to the interests of the small-fruit grower, it is one
of the most useful of all birds to the farmer and orchardist,
being probably as indispensable to the farm as any bird that
could be named. The problem that must be solved by the
fruit grower is how to prevent the Robin from destroying
small fruits, for the farmer and orchardist are interested in
seeing the numbers of this bird increased rather than dimin-
ished. The value of the bird to the farmer consists in the
following facts. It remains in Massachusetts a large part
of the year, and during the spring and early summer it lives
almost entirely on insects and worms, while insects form a
considerable portion of its food for the rest of the season. It
forages on fields, lawns, and cultivated grounds for many of
the insects that the farmer finds most difficult to control. It
also destroys many caterpillars, including hairy species, of
orchard, woodland, and shade trees.
Professors Jenks in Massachusetts, King in Wisconsin,
Forbes in IIlinois, and Beal at Washington, and Mr. Wilcox
in Ohio, have each studied the food of this bird. All these
gentlemen regard the Robin as beneficial except Mr. Wilcox,
who, while giving it due credit for a certain amount of the
good that it does, believes that the small-fruit grower should
be allowed to protect his crops by killing Robins where it
seems necessary. It should be noted, however, that a large
proportion of the Robins that Mr. Wilcox examined were
shot about the fruit garden on the experiment station
grounds when the fruit was ripe; and their food for the
time being would not fairly represent the average aliment
of the Robin, any more than would the food of the Robins
shot about Mr. Trouvelot’s insectary correctly represent the
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 285
ordinary food of the bird in that region. In the one case
much fruit and few insects were found in the birds’ stom-
achs ; in the other case the birds’ stomachs were filled with
the caterpillars of the American silkworm which Mr. Trou-
velot was breeding, and contained no fruit, although wild
berries were plentiful all about. The Robin might be a pest
in Ohio and a blessing in Massachusetts. It is a great fruit
eater, but it takes none of man’s products except fruit, and
in Massachusetts small fruits alone suffer materially from its
attacks.
Professor Beal, who probably has examined more stomachs
of Robins from different regions than any other investigator,
states that vegetable food formed nearly fifty-eight per cent.
of the contents of three hundred and thirty stomachs ; forty-
seven per cent. of the vegetable matter consisted of wild
fruits, and only a little more than four per cent. of varieties
that were possibly cultivated. This seems to sustain the
contention that, where wild fruit is plentiful, as it is in many
parts of the country, it is preferred by the Robin to culti-
vated fruit. The greatest quantity of cultivated fruit is
eaten in late June and in early July, when early cherries
and strawberries ripen, and before there is much ripe wild
fruit. Thus in Illinois Professor Forbes found that in June
fifty-five per cent. of the food of the Robin consisted of
cherries and raspberries, and fourteen birds that he exam-
ined, killed in July, had revelled in the fruit garden. Rasp-
berries, blackberries, and currants formed seventy-nine per
cent. of their food. Cherries made forty-four parts of the
food eaten in August by fourteen birds, but two-thirds of
these cherries were wild.
Where early wild fruits are plentiful the Robins do far
less injury to cultivated fruits. A list of the wild fruits eaten
by birds is given in another chapter. The Robin eats nearly
all of them; therefore it is unnecessary here to speak fur-
ther of the vegetable food of this bird, except to mention
a few of its favorite fruits. Among these are: wild cher-
ries, wild grapes of several species, the berries of the sour
gum or tupelo, smilax, greenbrier, holly, all species of
sumac, poison ivy, elder, huckleberries, blueberries, black-
286 USEFUL BIRDS.
berries, cranberries, and Juneberries. The methods of
protecting cultivated fruit against the Robin are given
elsewhere.
The Robin is the “early bird that catches the worm.”
Who has not seen it hopping over the field or lawn, with
head erect, looking and perhaps listening for
worms and grubs? All know the skill with
which it finds them and drags them forth
to daylight. Robins destroy numbers of
earthworms every spring, and throughout the season they
get as many as they can readily find. Earthworms have been
considered useful creatures since Darwin’s studies showed us
how they help to cultivate the soil; therefore at first sight
we might regard the Robin’s habit of eating them as injurious ;
but worms are remarkably prolific, and were they to increase
without check they might cultivate the fields and lawns so
assiduously as to interfere with the growth of plants. Some
city lawns where birds are not plentiful have been rendered
brown and unsightly by the numerous heaps of castings
thrown up by the too plentiful worms. We may safely set
down the earthworm habit of the Robin to its credit, so long
as it merely assists in destroying the surplus crawlers. Earth-
worms, however, form only a small part of the Robin’s food
for the year. Worms are not found much at the surface in
early spring, and during the dry weather of summer they are
too far down for the Robin to find them; nevertheless, he
is seen apparently “hunting worms” in the meadows and
fields at any time from March to July, and in fact all through
the season. If the ground is-bare in January or February,
Robins may be found now and then searching the fields for
insects ; if January and February are snowy, they begin the
search in March or early April. They find dormant cut-
worms and other caterpillars in some numbers even in Feb-
ruary. A very large per cent. of their food in February and
March consists of the larve of March flies (Bibio albipennis).
Every investigator who has studied the food of Robins has
found quantities of these insects in their stomachs. These
larvee live in colonies, and feed mainly on decaying vegetable
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 287
matter. They are usually harmless, but sometimes eat living
roots, and are believed to be capable of doing serious injury
to grass lands. The fact that Robins feed almost constantly
on March fly larve, thus keeping them under control, may
account for the little injury that these insects ordinarily do.
Professor Forbes took one hundred and seventy-five from the
stomach of a single bird. Our bird is very destructive to
caterpillars, especially the species that live on or near the
ground.
The cutworm is the early worm that the Robin gets. These
cutworms (the larvee of Noctuid moths) are dull-colored, hair-
less caterpillars, that are most often seen on the ground.
They usually hide during the day about the roots of plants,
under matted grass, or under the loose soil along rows of
plants in the garden. They come out of their hiding places
_ at dusk, and feed. Their destructiveness consists in their
manner of feeding. They often eat away the stems of young
plants near the ground, thus destroying many plants for the
sake of a few mouthfuls of food. Young cabbages, tomatoes,
beans, etc., fall victims to these pests. Where cutworms are
numerous, nothing can be successfully grown until they are
killed off. Probably the various species are individually and
collectively the most destructive of all caterpillars.
The Robin is abroad at the first break of day and until the
dusk of evening. He finds the cutworms in the morning
before they have crawled into their holes, and at night when
they first venture out; and he digs them out of the earth at
all hours of the day. Perhaps no other bird is so destructive
to these caterpillars in gardens. Professor Forbes found that
cutworms and other caterpillars formed thirty-seven per cent.
of the food of nine Robins taken in March. Wilson Flagg
watched the Robins about his house during a drought in July,
when earthworms were not to be had. He asserted that the
female bird carried off a cutworm as often as once in five
minutes, and that he saw her take two and even three at a
time. Professor Forbes found that nine May Robins had
eaten cutworms to the extent of twenty per cent. of their
food. These birds were taken in an orchard where canker-
x
288 USEFUL BIRDS.
worms and other insects were plentiful. This shows what
an extraordinary number of cutworms Robins will eat, even
when other insect food may easily be had.
They are not at all particular regarding the kind of cater-
pillars they secure, but feed eagerly on most common species ;
even the woolly bear (Jsta isabella) falls a victim. Wher-
ever the gipsy moth, the brown-tail moth, or
the forest tent moth swarm, the Robin eats
their caterpillars. All the spanworms seem
to be favorite morsels. The Robin takes can-
kerworms, tent caterpillars, curculios, leaf-
eating and wood-boring beetles, and ground
beetles. Many wireworms are taken, but
i the Robin renders no greater service on the
Robins. farm than the destruction of the white grubs
of May beetles and so-called “June bugs” of the genus
Lachnosterna. These white grubs, if unchecked, destroy
the roots of grasses to such-an extent that they ruin the
sod of meadows and fields, killing all the grass. In such
cases the top of the dead turf may be peeled off, a mere
worthless mass of dead, straw-like vegetation. The grubs
cut off strawberry plants just below the ground, killing the
plants and sometimes ruining whole beds. Corn and other
grains are destroyed. Potatoes, turnips, carrots, and root
crops of all kinds are eaten and ruined. Where the grubs
are plentiful, hardly a plant is safe from their ravages.
By reason of their subterranean habits, they are so difficult
of control that were they not checked by their natural ene-
mies it might be impossible for the farmer to raise hay, grain,
or vegetables. Careful observation during three years on a
farm convinced me that the Robin ranks first among the
natural enemies of the white grub.. In 1901 my garden was
seriously infested with white grubs ; there was some fear that
it would be difficult to raise either strawberries or roots; but
it was soon seen that something was digging funnel-shaped
holes along the rows, and taking out the grubs. A close
watch was kept, to discover the author of this good work,
and it was invariably found to be the Robin. The birds
seemed to locate the grubs either by sight or hearing, and
PLATE XXVI.— Robin on Nest. (Photograph from life.) (Copy-
right by C. A. Reed.) (From the annual report of the Massachu-
setts State Board of Agriculture, 1902.)
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 289.
dug down to them. The hole was often two to three inches
deep, and they found the grubs unerringly. They might
not have been able to do this had the surface not been kept
well fined and mellow.
The Robin revels in a well-cultivated garden. If he is not
molested, he will follow behind plow, hoe, or cultivator, and
pick up the grubs that are turned up, before they are able to
bury themselves in the soil. The Robins about our place
soon learned to pick up grubs and worms that were thrown
to them. The number that they find in a season is beyond
computation. They were so diligent in our gardens and
fields that the white grubs did no material injury. One
mother bird that was following me one morning picked up
three large grubs, one after another. She laid the first two
down on hard ground, secured the third, and then after two
or three futile attempts gathered them all in her beak and
flew away to her nest near by, where she fed them to her
eager young. The whole proceeding did not occupy over
five minutes.
Wherever these grubs appear in such numbers as to de-
stroy the turf on lawns, the Robin is always the most effi-
cient agency for their destruction. Robins flock to such
places, and find more grubs than does any other bird. In
meadows remote from houses Crows may be equally efficient,
but usually they are too shy to approach very near occupied
dwellings. The efficiency of the Robin lies in its skill in
finding and digging out the grubs (an accomplishment in
which it appears to excel all other birds), and in its num-
bers; for, except in villages and cities, where Sparrows are
more numerous, Robins are the most abundant birds. As
the season advances, Robins are often very destructive to
grasshoppers ; all orders of insects suffer from their attacks.
Even in June and July, when the Robin eats cultivated fruit,
insects comprise over forty per cent. of its*food.
The character of the food of nestling Robins is very im-
portant, for the Robin normally rears two or three broods
each year. Weed and Dearborn found that the largest
single element consumed by the young consisted of cut-
worms and related caterpillars, which formed twenty-seven
290 USEFUL BIRDS.
per cent. of their food. In my experience, caterpillars and
grubs form a very large percentage of their food, particu-
larly cutworms. A goodly number of earthworms are fed
in spring, when they are to be had in abundance ; but cut-
worms seem to be a favorite food at all times. Beetles
(including curculios, snap beetles, and wireworms), grass-
hoppers, crickets, Noctuid moths, spiders, snails, katydids,
grass blades (probably picked up with insects), and a few
seeds, are all found in the stomachs of the young.
Mrs. Irene G. Wheelock watched the nest of a pair of
Robins, and in three hours sixty-one earthworms, sixteen
yellow grubs, thirty-eight other insects, four grasshoppers,
and a few dragon flies and moths were carried to the nest-
lings. The last few days that they were in the nest, food
was brought to them every three minutes.
The earliest broods reared get practically no fruit, but the
late broods are fed some fruit while in the nest, and after they
leave the nest they live more largely on fruit than do the par-
ent birds, probably because it is easier to find than insects,
which the young birds are at first not skillful in capturing.
The Robin thrives wherever there are gardens and orchards.
In the prairie States, where there is little native fruit, it has
become very destructive to cultivated small fruits, and even
to apples; but in Massachusetts, where wild fruit is plenti-
ful, its principal depredations may be mostly obviated by
planting early mulberries or shadberries. The Robin de-
serves the protection it now receives from the law.
Bluebird.
Sialia sialis.
Length. — Six and one-half to seven inches.
Adult Male.— Above, bright azure blue; breast and under parts bright chestnut,
except the belly, which is white, or bluish-white.
Adult Female. — Similar, but much duller or paler.
Young.— Mostly brown, with blue on wings and tail; breast speckled with
brownish and white.
Nest.—In a hole in a tree, post, or in a bird house.
Eggs.— Pale blue, rarely white.
Season. — March to November; seen rarely in winter months.
The Bluebird is perhaps first of all birds in the affections
of the rural population of New England. Its gentle note, at
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 291
first a mere wandering voice in the skies, comes down to us
a sure augury of returning spring. The Robin, Song Spar-
row, and Blackbird renew the vernal prophecy; but when
the Bluebird warbles gently from the leafiess trees, and flits
from fence to house top, we feel that
the very spirit of the spring has come.
The Bluebird is usually common,
locally at least, in Massachusetts by
the middle of March, and flights may
be seen going south in September and
October. The bird is seldom seen
later than November; but it is quite
possible that occasionally a few winter Fig. 12'7.— Bluebird, about
in southeastern Massachusetts, as they Ses
have been reported there in December and January, and a
few are said to winter in the same latitude in Connecticut.
Wherever dense red cedar and sumac thickets are numerous
and fruitful, there is food enough to carry through the winter
such Bluebirds as may venture to stay. It is quite probable
that some of the early birds which come from the south in
February are starved and frozen during the extreme cold
weather and snowstorms which sometimes follow their ap-
pearance ; most of them, however, contrive to exist until
warm weather appears.
This bird often rears two or three broods. The male bird
takes care of the young after they have learned to fly, while
the female prepares a nest for the next brood.
The Bluebird needs no defence; it has long been regarded
as a harmless species, for it takes practically none of man’s
products, and boards itself. Nevertheless, it is probably not
as useful as the Robin, —a bird which has been widely reviled
asa pest. However, the utility of the Bluebird must be ac-
knowledged, although it perhaps eats more beneficial insects
in proportion to the harmful ones than does the Robin. The
Bluebird comes close to the Robin as a cutworm destroyer,
and at times it is an efficient caterpillar hunter. It is valu-
able in the orchard in repressing outbreaks of cankerworms.
As it eats the furry caterpillars of Arctians and other hairy
species, it is of especial value in Massachusetts. It is a
292 USEFUL BIRDS.
persistent foe of the Orthoptera. Grasshoppers constitute
nearly twenty-two per cent. of its food for the year, and in
August and September more than sixty per cent. Alto-
gether, seventy-six per cent. of its food for the season con-
sists of insects or allied forms, and the other twenty-four
per cent. is made up of wild fruit
and other vegetable substances, taken
mainly in winter. In selecting its
food, the Bluebird, like the Robin, is
governed as much by abundance as
by choice. The vegetable food of the
Fig. 128.—The Bluebira’s Bluebird proves its harmlessness to
lea crops. It consists almost entirely of
wild berries ; a few blackberries are eaten, and a little grass
and asparagus. Undoubtedly the Bluebird well deserves
the welcome annually accorded it.
WRENS.
Five species of Wren are found in Massachusetts, but only
one, the House Wren, was ever of much economic impor-
tance in garden or field.
The Winter Wren is ordinarily seen in woodlands and
thickets. It comes here chiefly in migration, and is not
common enough to be of much service to man.
The Carolina Wren is rare, and the two Marsh Wrens are
seldom if ever seen except in wet lowlands.
House Wren.
Troglodytes aédon.
Length. — About five inches.
Adult.— Upper parts brown; lower parts grayish-brown, sometimes grayish-
white; wings, tail, and flanks faintly barred with blackish ; tail often held
erect.
Nest. — Composed of sticks and rootlets, in a hollow tree or any accessible cavity.
Eggs.— Six to eight; white, thickly speckled with reddish-brown.
A once common and familiar species, but now no longer a
regular summer resident in the greater part of Massachusetts,
the Wren is apparently doomed to give way before the ad-
vance of the House (or “ English”) Sparrow. Attention is
called, however, to the desirable qualities of the Wren, in
S
PLATE XXVII.— Wren at Nest Hole. (Photograph, from
life, by C. A. Reed.) (From American Ornithology.)
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 293
the hope that wherever it still remains people may be induced
to provide tenements for it and protect it from the Sparrow,
and so assist it to increase in numbers.
This sprightly little bird seeks the homes of man partly
because of the nesting places afforded by the hollow trees
of the orchard, and partly because of the number of insects
it finds about house, barn, orchard, and garden. Its pert
appearance, as it dashes about with short, upraised tail;
its bubbling, ecstatic song; its sharp, scolding notes, as it
creeps about the wood pile or berates the family cat, —
were once familiar sights and sounds, not only about the
farmhouse, but even in city yards and gardens, for, until the
Sparrow came, the Wren was in many localities a common
village and city bird. A valiant little warrior, it is well
able to protect its young against the intrusion of other small
native birds, and has even been known to defend its home
successfully against the dreaded cat; but it has given ground
before the Sparrow mob, and is now rarely seen in the
cities. The few individuals now left nest mainly in remote
orchards.
Its alarm note is a sharp chirp, but its song is an inde-
seribable burst of melody. It bubbles forth as if the bird
were too full of joyous music to express it properly, for the
sweet and pent-up notes seem to crowd each other in the
attempt to escape from longer confinement. In this respect
the music is much like that of the Bobolink, but it is entirely
different in quality. In spring the males sing a large part
of the time.
The Wren is one of the most active of birds, and when its
large and growing family is in the nest it is almost continu-
ally occupied in searching the shrubbery, orchard, wood pile,
fence, or wall, as well as the vegetables in the garden, for
insects. Nest building gives scope to its feverish industry,
and a single pair will sometimes build two or three nests at
almost the same time, if they can find convenient receptacles
for them.
It is almost entirely beneficial in its food habits. Pro-
fessor Beal finds that ninety-eight per cent. of its sustenance
consists of animal matter, composed of insects and their allies,
294 USEFUL BIRDS.
and two per cent. of vegetable matter, which is made up of
bits of plants taken accidentally with the insects. Half of
the animal food is grasshoppers and beetles ; the remainder
mostly caterpillars, bugs, and spiders.
The Wren does not range far from its nest, and when that
.is near the garden it gets a large part of its food there. In
Medford we succeeded in getting two families of Wrens to
nest in boxes, one on the house, the other in an apple tree.
The entrances to these boxes were round holes a little less
than an inch in diameter. The Sparrows could not get in,
and so the Wrens were unmolested.
The only injurious habit of the Wrens seems to be their
mischievous conduct in breaking and even eating the eggs
in the nests of other birds. This habit seems to be common
to individuals of this and other species of Wren, but it has
been recorded so seldom in Massachusetts that no one need
hesitate to put up boxes for them. Unless something can
be done to provide for their increase, they are likely to
disappear from the State.
SPARROWS.
Some members of this group, particularly the Finches and
Grosbeaks, have been included in previous pages, among the
birds of orchard and woodland (see p. 215); the remaining
common species are mainly birds of the field that nest on
or near the ground, and get most of their food in fields,
gardens, or pastures.
Although they are all seed-eating birds, they live largely
on insects during spring and early summer, and their young
are fed mainly on such food. In fall and winter Sparrows feed
on the seeds of grains, grasses, and weeds, although they
are not then averse to insect food when they can find it.
Dr. Judd, in his important paper, “The Relation of Spar-
rows to Agriculture,” states that the value of these birds to
the agriculturist is greater “than that of any other group
whose economic status has thus far been investigated.” He
says, nevertheless, that the native Sparrows contrast markedly
in this respect with the introduced “ English” Sparrow, which
isa pest. The great bulk 2 the food of Sparrows consists
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 295
of seed, fruit, and insects. The native Sparrows destroy
very little grain, great quantities of weed seeds and insects,
and hardly any cultivated fruit ; they are, therefore, almost
entirely harmless. They frequent grass fields, cultivated
fields, and gardens, and in some cases orchards; thus their
good work is done where it is of great benefit to the farmer.
Dr. Judd tells us that the food of Sparrows consists of
from twenty-five to thirty-five per cent. animal matter, and
from sixty-five to seventy-five per cent. veyetable matter ;
this is exclusive of the mineral matter, which is mostly
swallowed as an aid to digestion. Beneficial insects sel-
dom amount to more than two per cent. of the food; this
is a very low average. The Flycatchers and Swallows take a
very much larger per cent. of useful insects. Sparrows may
do some slight harm in distributing the seeds of weeds; but,
as their stomachs grind the food most thoroughly, it is proba-
ble that very few seeds pass through the alimentary canal in
a condition to germinate. ,
On the other side of the account we find that insect pests
make up from ten.to twenty per cent. of the year’s food;
these are mainly grasshoppers and cutworms, army worms
and their allies, and beetles, such as click beetles and weevils.
Bugs are eaten in small quantities. While nearly all the
native Sparrows eat Geometrid caterpillars, like the canker-
worms, only a few have been known to eat the hairy species.
Such weevils as injure clover and strawberries are destroyed
in large numbers; also some flea beetles and leaf-eating
beetles are eaten.
The young of Sparrows are almost entirely insectivorous
until they leave the nest ; and, as many of these birds usually
rear at least two broods in a season, they do great good in
the gardens and fields while rearing their young.
When the good work of destroying insect pests is practi-
cally over for the season, the Sparrows turn at once to the
ripening seeds of weeds. The number of such seeds that a
single bird will eat in a day has never been ascertained ; but
a Tree Sparrow was found to have in its stomach seven hun-
dred seeds of pigeon grass, and a Snowflake had taken at
one meal a thousand seeds of pigweed. The Japanese mil-
296 USEFUL BIRDS.
let (Panicum crus-galli), a wild barnyard grass or weed
improved by cultivation, is much sought by birds. The
seed is larger than that of most weeds, and yet a single
Sparrow will eat a large number in a day. During the hard
winter of 1903-04 about thirty Sparrows came to our window
to feed on this seed, which was there supplied to them. Sev-
eral hours of each morning and afternoon were thus spent.
As they were constantly moving and changing positions, it
was difficult to follow any one bird more than a few minutes
at a time; nevertheless, some accurate figures were obtained
regarding the number of seeds eaten in a given time by cer-
tain birds. A Fox Sparrow ate one hundred and three seeds
in two minutes and forty-seven seconds. There were five
Juncos eating at about the same rate all this time. A Song
Sparrow ate thirty-four seeds in one minute, ten seconds ;
a Junco ate twenty-eight in forty-eight seconds; another,
sixty-six in one minute, eleven seconds; another, one hun-
dred and ten in three minutes, forty-five seconds; while a
Song Sparrow ate one hundred and fifty-four in the same
length of time. This Song Sparrow had been eating for about
half an hour before the count began, and continued for some
time after it was finished. A Junco ate ninety-three seeds in
two minutes, fifteen seconds; and another ate seventy-nine
in two minutes, twenty seconds. It is readily seen that
thirty seeds a minute was below the average for these birds ;
and if each bird ate at that rate for but a single hour each
day, he would destroy eighteen hundred seeds each day, or
twelve thousand, six hundred a week. There were many
days, when the ground was covered with snow, that certain
birds spent several hours each day eating seeds at my win-
dow. This we know, for there were but two Fox Sparrows
and two Song Sparrows in the neighborhood, and all four
were often at the window at the same time. Most of the
day the birds, when not at the window, were picking up such
seeds as they could get elsewhere from the weeds about the
place or from the chaff and hayseed provided. They ate
more than a bushel of seed at the window, besides all the weed
seeds they found elsewhere. Moreover, they ate hayseed that
they picked up in the barn and sheds, and fine particles of
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 297
grain and small seeds that they found in the poultry yards
and scratching-sheds. When Professor Beal states his belief
that the Tree Sparrows in the State of Iowa eat eight hundred
and seventy-five tons of weed seeds in a winter, it seems, in
view of our experience, a low estimate.
Not far from the house was a patch of Japanese millet about
ten rods long by one wide. This was allowed to stand until
fully ripe, and then reaped and threshed out for the seed.
As it stood a little too long, much seed fell and was left on
the ground for the birds, — probably two bushels or more.
During the winter they cleaned this up so thoroughly that
only about a dozen stalks sprang up the next spring at one
end of the patch.
When Sparrows flock normally about a weed patch, they
gather up nearly ninety per cent. of the seed during a winter ;
but when more are attracted by extra food, they often get
nearly all the seeds, as they did that year about our garden.
Dr. Judd examined a rectangular space of eighteen inches
where Sparrows had been feeding in a smartweed thicket.
He found eleven hundred and thirty mutilated seeds, and
only two whole ones. No smartweed grew there the follow-
ing year. Sparrows were still feeding on these and similar
seeds on May 13, and a diligent search showed only half a
dozen whole seeds in the field. Weed seeds form more than
half the food of mature Sparrows for the year.
This great group of birds comprises species of such varied
habits that it is represented everywhere. Sparrows, Finches,
Grosbeaks, or Buntings are found not only in the woods,
fields, and city streets, but in swamps and marshes, and
among the desert sand hills of Cape Cod and Ipswich. They
range from the mountain top to the sea level, and from the
shores of the sea to the farthest western boundary of the
State; even at sea migrating Sparrows are sometimes seen,
.for they not only cross wide bays and estuaries, but they
visit remote islands, and are sometimes blown out to sea.
In the following pages some of the more common and
useful species will be considered. The “English” Sparrow
will be treated among the enemies of birds.
298 USEFUL BIRDS.
Indigo Bunting. Indigo Bird.
Cyanospiza cyanea.
Length. — About five and one-half inches.
Adult Male.— Bright, lustrous indigo-blue, deepest on head, and often with a
greenish tinge; wings and tail dark brown, with blue marks and tints.
Adult Female and Young. —Upper parts light brown, sometimes faintly, but
never prominently, streaked; under parts brownish-gray ; breast and sides
faintly streaked.
Nest. —In low bush.
Eggs.— White.
Season. — May to September.
This bright blue Bunting is one of the most brilliant of
northern birds. The color of the male is so dark that at
a distance it seems almost black. The
male requires three years to attain full
plumage. It frequents bushy pastures,
sprout lands, and old fruit gardens
grown up to weeds. In late August
and September it is seen in sweet-corn
a aoa ae patches or cornfields.
natural eize. Its song is a rather rich and _pleas-
ing refrain, with a metallic ring or jingle. A few notes
seem to exhaust its vocabulary and its breath at the same
time, but it is soon ready to try again. Perseverance is its
unfailing virtue, for it sings, intermittently, all through the
long, hot summer day. Its alarm note is a sharp chip.
It feeds more on the caterpillars that infest trees and
bushes than do most Sparrows, and takes many such larve to
its young. It is fond of grasshoppers,
and takes some insects from the garden.
It eats the birch plant louse with avidity.
A few flies, mosquitoes, or gnats are
taken; cankerworms and other measur-
ing worms, the larvee of several species of ig. 130 —Inaigo Bunt.
butterflies, and the imagoes of nocturnal ing, female.
and Tineid moths, with small beetles of different species, con-
stitute a portion of its insect food. The larger part of its food
consists of seeds, many of which are those of weeds. During
its short stay with us it is one of the few useful species seen
much about the garden, and is of some service in the orchard.
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 299
Song Sparrow. Ground Sparrow. Ground Bird.
Melospiza cinerea melodia.
Length. — About six and one-half inches.
Adult Male.— Above, brown; the back streaked with a darker shade; top of
head reddish-brown, mottled with blackish streaks; a streak of light gray
through center of crown and one over the eye; a dark line through eye
and two on the lower jaw; breast and sides whitish, spotted with dark
brown, the spots usually massed in the center of breast, where they form a
large spot or cluster; tail rounded and rather long.
Nest. — Usually on ground or in bush, rarely in tree.
Eggs.— Whitish, endlessly varied with browns.
Season. — Resident, but not common in winter. +
Few birds are better known than the Song Sparrow, and
few are better friends to man. Those who do not know the
bird will recognize it as the sweet singer of March and
April, witha large blotch in the middle
of its spotted breast. It prefers moist
land near water, and may be found
along the banks of brooks and the
shores of ponds or rivers. The nest
is often sunk in the sloping bank of
some brook or ditch. According to
Thoreau, its song, as expressed by the
country people, runs thus: “Maids!
3 : Fig. 131.—Song Sparrow,
maids! maids! hang on your tea- about two-thirds natural
kettle-ettle-ettle.” It has a charac- %”*
teristic chenk, evidently an alarm note, and several other
notes.
The Song Sparrow is at home in rich, moist gardens, and
feeds among crops like cabbage and celery, which are often
raised on lowlands. It is destructive to cabbage plant lice
and cutworms. It eats some caterpillars of the gipsy moth,
the brown-tail moth, and several of the hairless pests among
the Geometrids. Leaf hoppers and spittle insects, grasshop-
pers, locusts, crickets, and click beetles are among the pests
that it destroys. It picks up a few snails and aquatic in-
sects around the water. Flies and their larve are relished.
Earthworms and spiders are frequently taken. Only two
per cent. of the food consists of useful insects; injurious
species make up eighteen per cent. The vegetable food
300 USEFUL BIRDS.
consists of small fruit, mostly wild, four per cent. of grain,
mostly waste, picked up in the fields, while fifty per cent.
of the entire food of the year is composed of the seeds of
weeds. Dr. Judd remarks that the chief value of this bird
as a seed-eater lies in its habit of eating the seeds of polyg-
onum; these seeds are not so much eaten by other birds.
But the Song Sparrow eats the seed of chickweed, purslane,
sorrel, dandelion, and dock, all of which are common in
Massachusetts gardens. More than half the grass seed eaten
belongs to such troublesome species as crab grass and pigeon
grass. Witch grass and barnyard grass are among the seeds
that are often freely eaten by this useful bird.
The Song Sparrow sometimes learns to come about the
door for crumbs. A pair built a nest on the ground in our
garden ; buta cat found it. Thena nest was built in a bush ;
this suffered a fate like the first. Then the birds went up
high among the thick sprouts on the trunk of an elm, built
another nest, and reared their young in safety. They were
wiser in their way than men, who, in spite of their superior
intelligence, continue to build their homes on the shores of
rivers which periodically overflow their banks, or on the
slopes of volcanoes that occasionally burn or bury cities. |
The Song Sparrow is a bird to cultivate. Friendly,
cheery, musical, harmless, gentle, useful, — what more can
be desired ?
Slate-colored Junco. Black Snowbird.
Junco hyemalis.
Length. — About six and one-fourth inches,
Adult Male.—In winter, all upper parts, and lower parts from chin -to breast,
dark slaty-gray; lower breast and belly white; two outer tail feathers and
part of third white; bill pinkish-white, blackish at tip.
Adult Female.— Similar, but lighter, and usually more rusty.
Young. — Browner, and slightly streaked ; throat and breast paler.
Nest.— On ground.
Eggs.— White, spotted with brown.
Season. — Resident, but most common in spring and fall.
The Snowbird does not often breed in Massachusetts, ex-
cepting on the higher lands of the north-central and western
parts of the State. Pairs are said to nest occasionally in
ice houges, which are certainly cool, if not suitable situa-
tions. It is a bird of the Canadian fauna, and it winters
in Massachusetts wherever conditions are favorable. In the
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 301
southeastern portion of the State, where the ground is bare
in sheltered places through much of the winter, or where
weed seed, chaff, and other food can be secured, this bird is
common in the colder months. Its notes at this season are
chiefly Sparrow-like chirps.
It is useful here mainly because of its consumption of
weed seeds in spring, fall, and winter. Juncos come from
the north with the
first hard frost,
and are among the
most abundant of
our fall migrants.
They feed very
largely on the
seeds of amaranth,
lamb’s quarters,
sorrel, wild sun-
flower, and other
pernicious weeds.
A flock of these
dark birds on the
new-fallen snow is an interesting sight on a cold winter's
day, as they come familiarly about the house or barnyard.
Audubon says that in winter they burrow in stacks of corn
or hay for shelter at night during the continuance of inclem-
ent weather. As spring comes they begin to sing much
like the Chipping Sparrow. They: now converse together
with a musical twittering, and about the first of May they
leave for their northern breeding ground.
Fig. 132.—Slate-colored Junco, one-half natural size.
Field Sparrow. Bush Sparrow.
Spizella pusilla.
Length. — About five and one-half inches.
Adult. — Crown and back reddish-brown; back feathers showing pale edgings
and lightly streaked with blackish; whitish wing bars; cheeks and sides
of head, to crown, gray; a reddish-brown streak behind the eye; below,
gray; breast washed with pale buff; bill pale reddish.
Nest. — On ground or in low bush.
Eggs.— Small, white, with rather fine brown spots.
Season. — April to October.
The Field Sparrow is a common summer resident of Mas-
sachusetts. It arrives in southeastern Massachusetts some-
302 USEFUL BIRDS.
times as early as the latter part of March, but usually delays
its coming until April. It frequents bushy pastures and
worn-out fields, or dry, sandy sprout lands. On its first
appearance it seeks the shelter afforded by a wooded or bushy
southerly slope, and for-
ages from the underbrush
out into the fields.
The song of the Field
Sparrow is one of the
sweetest sounds in na-
ture. It is a fine, clear
strain, opening with a
few modulated notes, and
ending in a pensive di-
minuendo trill, as clear as
the sound of a bell. It
is a characteristic sound
of the dry upland, when
the still, warm June day
sleeps upon the hills, and
shimmering heat waves
rise from the warm turf.
The bird has also a series
Fig. 183.—Field Sparrow, one-half natural of Sparrow-like chirps
ia and twitters, but nothing
to compare with its song, which, though varied, is usually
the same in character in all parts of Massachusetts. Dr.
J. A. Allen says that the song of the males in Florida is
very different from that of the northern birds.
The Field Sparrow is generally shyer than the Song Spar-
row or the Chipping Sparrow, and is usually found more
away from the farm buildings, and in the open field, pastures,
or “scrub.” It quite often alights on trees to sing or feed.
I have found it feeding on cankerworms, tent caterpillars,
and the caterpillars of the brown-tail moth. It is therefore
of some value in woodland and orchard. It is seldom seen in
the garden except when ripe weeds are to be found; but it is
more often found in cornfields and potato fields, and Gentry
says that it eats cabbage worms. It is useful in the fields,
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 303
as it destroys May beetles, leaf hoppers, and sawflies. It
eats more useful insects than some other Sparrows, and takes
a good many spiders, some ants, and some earthworms. It
also eats the seeds of many weeds, but feeds largely on the
seeds of grasses and a little grain, mostly oats. A dozen of
these Sparrows collected in a wheat field had eaten no wheat,
but were feeding on weed seed.
The Field Sparrow, though less valuable to the farmer than
some other species, is useful, and fills a place of its own.
Chipping Sparrow. Chippy. Chipper. Chip Bird. Hair Bird.
Spizella socialis.
Length.— Five to five and one-half inches.
Adult. — Crown bright reddish-brown ; back brown, dark-streaked ; a light-gray
line over the eye, a blackish line through it; cheeks and under parts light
gray or pale ash; tail slightly notched.
Young. — Breast, sides, and top of head streaked.
Nest.— Lined with hair; in a bush, vine, or tree.
Eggs.— Light bluish, with a ring of dark spots around the larger end.
Season. — April to October.
This is the little dooryard bird that nests in the apple trees
about the house, and picks up crumbs on the old stone door-
step. It is common in village dooryards,
along the roads, in orchards, pastures,
and particularly in gardens and plowed
lands. It holds the distinction of being
the most familiar and useful of all Spar-
rows in the yard and garden. Unlike
some other Sparrows, it is often found ere nn
far from bushy coverts, in the very cen- Sparrow, about one-half
ter of plowed fields. a a
The song of the Chipping Sparrow is a mere string of dry
chips, sometimes repeated very rapidly and almost running
into a trill, sometimes more slowly. On a spring morning
the sound of the distant birds answering one another in dif-
ferent keys gives an impression like the rising and falling
of the breath of a sleeper in the fields. Occasionally some
talented bird modulates its usual song, giving a somewhat
more musical, varied rendition, which suggests some of the
songs of Warblers. The ordinary notes are a variety of
304 USEFUL BIRDS.
chips, a sort of squeak, and a series of querulous twitters,
uttered when the bird is angry. The males are sometimes
pugnacious, and have been known to fight to the death.
The Chippy feeds very largely in spring and early summer
on small caterpillars, and is therefore very useful in the
orchard, Mr. Kirkland saw
a single bird eat fifty-four
cankerworms at one sitting.
The Chippy is destructive to
hairy caterpillars. It was
Fig. 135.—Moth of the tent caterpitlar, the Chipping Sparrow that
BRET frequently interfered with
experiments upon gipsy caterpillars, by breaking through
the net that enclosed them and stealing the hairy worms.
This bird is a persistent enemy of the caterpillar of the
brown-tail moth, the tent caterpillar, and that of the tus-
sock moth. Nocturnal moths; particularly Arctians, and
Tineid moths are caught in the air. Currant worms do not
come amiss. It is destructive to the codling moth and the
moths of the tent caterpillar and the forest tent caterpillar.
In all, thirty-eight per cent. of the food of the Chipping
Sparrow consists of animal matter, three-fourths of which is
made up of noxious insects.
In June ninety-three per
cent. of the food consists of
insects, of which thirty-six
per cent. is grasshoppers,
caterpillars form twenty-five
per cent., and leaf-eating
beetles six per cent.
I have been much im-
pressed with the value of this
bird in the garden during the
spring and summer months.
It destroys at least three Fig. 136.—Chipping Sparrows hunting
species of caterpillar on the BERtSOnnes
cabbage. It is the mgst destructive of all birds to the
injurious pea louse (Mectarophora destructor), which caused
a loss of three million dollars to the pea crop of a single
PLATE XXVIII. — Chipping Sparrows feeding their Young.
(Photograph, from life, by C. A. Reed.) (From the annual
report of the Massachusetts State Board of Agriculture, 1902.)
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 305
State in one year. It is a persistent destroyer of the grubs
that mine the leaves of beets. I watched one bird secure
eleven of these grubs in a few minutes. It feeds on the eggs
of the parsley butterfly (Papilio polyxenes), and also takes
young larve of this species and other insects from the leaves
of celery, lettuce, and other small truck. I have no doubt
that an investigation of the food of this bird in the garden
would show it to be of great value to the market gardener.
It likes to feed on cultivated ground, in the shade of the
green leaves of vegetables. It creeps about noiselessly up
and down the rows, an unseen and unnoticed influence for
good. Injurious beetles, bugs, leaf hoppers, grasshoppers,
and ants are taken freely.
Its vegetable food is of less importance than its animal food.
It eats wild cherries, and Professor Beal says that he has
seen it take a few cultivated cherries. Only four per cent.
of the seeds eaten are grain, principally oats. Chickweed
seed is commonly eaten, and some seeds of clover, ragweed,
amaranth, wood sorrel, lamb’s quarters, purslane, knotweed,
and black bindweed ; forty-eight per cent. of the seed eaten
is grass seed, of which twenty-six per cent. is crab grass
and pigeon grass, —two common weeds. ‘The seeds of crab
grass form the most important part of the vegetable diet
whenever they can be obtained, for then the birds fill them-
selves with those only. Many Sparrows eat seeds whenever
they are obtainable, even in summer, when“insects are plenti-
ful. The seeds of the dandelion are among the earliest that
the Chipping Sparrow finds in summer. It frequently seeks
the seeds of this plant on lawns. It takes them one by one
from the opening heads, and spends so much time in this
manner that it must consume a great deal of this seed. In
August it sometimes visits oat stubble, where it picks up
fallen grain.
Dr. Judd found that, on the one side, only one per cent.
of the food eaten was composed of useful insects, while more
than twenty-five per cent. consisted of insect pests; and, on
the other side, grain composed four per cent. and weed seeds
forty per cent. of the food. These figures clearly show the
good service rendered to man by the Chipping Sparrow.
306 USEFUL BIRDS.
Tree Sparrow. Winter Chippy.
Spizella monticola.
Length. — About six inches.
Adult. — Crown chestnut; line over eye dull white; line through eye dark (not
black) ; back bay, black-streaked; tail dusky, with light edgings; two
prominent white wing bars; below, whitish; side of head, throat, and
upper breast tinted with ash ; breast with a central dusky spot ; lower breast
and sides tinged with pale brownish.
Season. — October to April.
The Tree Sparrow is a common winter resident of most
parts of the State. The species is almost as regular in ap-
pearance as the Junco, but not so plentiful. Though called
the Tree Sparrow, it is largely a
ground Sparrow while in Massa-
chusetts. Wherever it can find a
plentiful supply of food and good
shelter it remains throughout the
winter, unless driven south by
snows so deep as to cover its food
supply. It frequents thickets on
Fig. 137.—TreeSparrow,about the sheltered side of hills, near
one-half natural size. swamps, meadows, or weedy fields.
In such fields it often feeds far from bushy cover, but flies
quickly to the thicket upon the approach of danger.
This species usually goes in flocks, and individuals are not
commonly seen alone; although a single bird may some-
times be found with a flock of Juncos. It feeds mainly on
the ground, and picks up the seeds of weeds as they fall.
A snowfall merely brings the birds nearer the tops of the
weeds, and so long as there is plenty of seed they are as
happy as the Snowbirds. They can climb about among
the stronger weed stalks, clinging like a Goldfinch. Often
two birds may be seen feeding from a single weed, while
another hops about on the snow below, gleaning the seeds
that fall. This species ‘follows the Juncos into weedy vege-
table gardens, and flocks about farms and haystacks to pick
up seeds. The Tree Sparrows are among the few birds
that can “look our winters in the face and sing.” They
are occasionally heard singing in November and December
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 307
and late in February, when deep snow covers the ground.
The song is among the sweetest of Sparrow notes, but not
very strong. It slightly resembles that of the Fox Sparrow.
Like other Sparrows, they chirp and twitter from time to
time, but the full chorus of a flock in winter is a sound worth
going far to hear.
Seeds form ninety-eight per cent. of the Tree Sparrow’s
food while it remains in the United States. It feeds very
largely on pigeon grass, crab grass, and other grasses, and
on the seeds of ragweed, amaranth, lamb’s quarters, and
other weeds. Only one per cent. of the food consists of
grain, while fifty per cent. is weed seed. It therefore ren-
ders some service, and does no harm.
White-throated Sparrow. Peabody Bird.
Zonotrichia albicollis.
Length. — About six and three-fourths inches.
Adult Male. — Above, brown, black-streaked ; crown black, with a central white
stripe; a white stripe above the eye, changing to yellow from eye to bill;
below this another black stripe extends along the sides of head behind the
eye; sides of head gray, a paler shade on breast; large throat patch and
belly white; sides brownish ; wings with two inconspicuous white bars.
Adult Female. — Similar, but duller.
Young.— Crown dark brown; line over eye buffy; throat patch dirty white.
Nest.— On ground or in a low bush.
Eggs.— Pale, and heavily spotted,
Season. — Spring and fall; local in summer; very rare in winter.
This large and handsome Sparrow is a migrant through the
State in spring and fall; many breed in the north-central
and western parts of the State, some in northern Worcester
County, and many others in the Berkshire
hills. Occasionally one remains through
the winter in the southeastern portion of
the State; but most of the White-throats
that are seen here are passing south in Sep-
tember and October, or going north late
in April or during the first part of May. * ea ey ee
The great body of the White-throats usually one-half natural
passes through the State within three weeks kasi
in spring and fall. They find shelter in brush piles, thickets,
or shrubbery, where they scratch about among dry leaves on
the ground.
308 USEFUL BIRDS.
The alarm note is a metallic chip; and the song, which is
often heard in May, is a sweet whistled strain, which has
been rendered “Old Sam Peabody, Peabody, Peabody,” and
from this fancied resemblance to these words it is called the
Peabody Bird.
In May, when the White-throat passes north, it is.of some
service in the destruction of beetles. In the fall it feeds to
some extent on berries and berry seeds, but its main useful-
ness at this season lies in the destruction of weed seeds.
It is very fond of the seeds of ragweed and polygonum.
Dr. Judd says that in October (when these birds are com-
mon in Massachusetts) ragweed seed constitutes forty-five
per cent. of their food.
Grasshopper Sparrow. Yellow-winged Sparrow.
Coturniculus savannarum passerinus.
Length. — About five inches.
Adult. — Upper parts generally brown, streaked with black on back, much varie-
gated, quail-like, and mixed with gray on rump; crown very dark, with a
buffy line through it; a buffy-yellow stripe over eye; under parts buff,
fading to whitish on the belly; no noticeable breast streaks; wings below
the bend edged with bright yellow, ordinarily concealed from view ; tail
short.
Young. — Similar, but breast streaked with blackish.
Nest.-——On ground.
Eggs.— White, brown-spotted.
Season. — May to September.
The Grasshopper Sparrow is common locally in eastern
Massachusetts, but rare or wanting in many localities. In the
southeastern part of the State it is hardly locally common,
except in Nantucket. It is found through middle and south-
ern Worcester County and in the Connecticut valley, and is
probably much more common than is generally believed, as
it is never conspicuous, and is largely confinéd to the open
fields, where it readily hides in the grass. Minot says “they
frequent almost exclusively dry fields, particularly such as do
not contain a luxuriant vegetation.” While this appears to
be true of eastern Massachusetts, where many neglected fields
are of that character, it is not altogether true of Worcester
County. Although this Sparrow is never found in swamps,
it is seen occasionally in meadows, and often inhabits fertile
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 309
grass lands and cultivated fields. Many years ago, in West-
borough, I found two nests of this species while hoeing in
potato fields, and the birds were then common in a stretch
of fertile rolling fields and meadows east of Worcester.
It is never found habitually in meadows, however, like that
closely related species, Henslow’s Sparrow; for, while the
latter, so far as I have observed, always breeds in wet land,
the Grasshopper Sparrow breeds on the slopes near by. I
have never seen Henslow’s Sparrow on the drier land ex-
cept near Amherst; and the Grasshopper Sparrow is rarely
seen in wet spots, even where the two species occupy the
same fields. While these two Sparrows are locally common,
neither of them is generally so. They resemble each other
so closely that it is rather difficult to distinguish them in the
field except by their notes and their habitat. The streaks
on the breast of the Henslow’s Sparrow will identify it when
they can be seen. The notes, however, are quite different.
The common note of the Henslow’s Sparrow somewhat re-
sembles the syllable kee’ chick. When its nest is approached,
the bird will allow the observer to get within a few feet, as
it moves through the grass like a mouse, reiterating this note.
The ordinary notes of the Grasshopper Sparrow are a chirr,
like the note of an insect, and a sharp chick. The song,
which is often uttered from the top of a wall, a fence, or a
stone in the field, much resembles the stridulation of a long-
horned grasshopper, and gives the bird its name. The lay is
very weak, and often passes unnoticed, or is mistaken for the
song of some insect. Minot gives it as chic’-chic’-a-seé, with
the chief accent on the last and highest syllable, —a very
good description.
The food of this bird while in Massachusetts is probably
about seventy-five per cent. animal matter, largely insects.
This Sparrow is very destructive to cutworms, army worms,
wireworms, click beetles, weevils, and grasshoppers ; spiders,
myriapods, snails, and earthworms are eaten in small quanti-
ties. It eats no cultivated fruit, very little grain, and some
seeds of grasses and weeds. It takes fully forty times as
many injurious as beneficial insects, and is one of the most
useful birds of the fields.
310 USEFUL BIRDS.
Savanna Sparrow.
Passerculus sandwichensis savanna.
Length. — About five and one-half inches.
Aduit. — Brown above ; feathers generally pale (or gray) edged, and dark-streaked ;
a narrow whitish stripe through crown, and a yellow line above the eye;
white or buffy below, thickly streaked with dusky; a cluster of streaks
on the breast is sometimes gathered into a blotch, as in the Song Sparrow,
but the tail is short and notched, rather than long and rounded, as in the
Song Sparrow, and not noticeably marked.
Young. — Similar; colors more suffused ; no yellow over eye.
Vest. — On ground.
Eggs.— Bluish-white, marked thickly with brown.
Season. — April to November.
The Savanna Sparrow is a common summer resident along
portions of the seacoast, and through the central and western
parts of the State. It is found along river valleys, in upland
meadows, fertile fields, and pastures. In eastern and south-
ern Massachusetts it breeds only locally or near the coast,
but in Worcester County and through the central and western
parts of the State it is common in favorable localities.
Although a bird of the meadow or savanna, it is common
in many open fields and pastures of the hill country. It hasa
Sparrow-like chirp, but its notes and song otherwise much re-
semble those of insects, particularly the chirping of crickets,
although the song is perhaps a trifle more musical than that
of the Grasshopper Sparrow. Myr. Hoffman describes it well
as two or three preliminary chirps, followed by two long,
insect-like trills, the second a little lower in key than the
first, thus: ¢s7p, tsip, tsip, tseeeeeeeee, tse-ee-ee-ee. The song
is often given from a stone, post, or fence. This bird is
rarely seen off the ground, an occasional perch on a stone
heap or fence being usually the only deviation from this rule ;
but it sometimes perches fifteen to twenty-five feet up in a
tree, or flies from tree to tree along the edge of afield. Al-
though it often lives and breeds in the hill country, it may
be seen in fresh-water marshes during migrations, and fre-
quents such spots as are dear to Rails and Swamp Sparrows.
In the south it is an inhabitant of wet fresh-water meadows
or savannas.
Nearly half the food of the Savanna Sparrow while in
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 311
Massachusetts consists of insects, mainly injurious species,
such as are eaten by other Sparrows. It is particularly fond
of beetles. It eats more ants than do most Sparrows, many
cutworms, a few spiders, and some snails. The vegetable
food consists largely of the seeds of pigeon grass, panic
grass, wild rice, and marsh grasses. —
Vesper Sparrow. Grass Finch. Bay-winged Bunting.
Powcetes gramineus.
Length. — About six inches.
Adult. — Above, grayish-brown, finely streaked with dusky; crown finely
streaked, but with no dividing line; cheeks buffy, with a dark patch;
a narrow white eye ring; below, whitish (buffy where streaked), narrowly
streaked with brown or black on breast and sides; a bay patch near the
bend of the wing; tail dark, moderately long; outer tail feathers white.
Nest. — On ground.
Eggs.— Dull white or buffy, with many spots, usually overlaid by large dark
marks and scrawls.
Season. — April to October.
The Vesper Sparrow is, next to the Song Sparrow, the
most abundant ground Sparrow in Massachusetts. It is gen-
Fig. 139.— Vesper Sparrow, one-half natural size.
erally distributed wherever there are open fields and upland
pastures, but it is not a bird of the meadows, and is not as
common in some parts of southeastern Massachusetts as else-
312 USEFUL BIRDS.
where. It is not a dooryard bird, like the Chipping Spar-
row or Song Sparrow, but prefers upland fields, hill pastures,
and plowed lands, at some distance from the farm buildings.
It is sometinies seen in vegetable gardens.
It is not so closely confined to the ground as some other
ground Sparrows, but perches on ridgepoles, wires, and
trees. It frequently runs along the ground in pastures or
potato fields, keeping just ahead of the observer as he walks.
When the female is startled from her nest of young, she uses
all her arts to entice the intruder away, fluttering along the
ground with white-bordered tail spread conspicuously, and
dragging her wings as if sorely wounded, —a tempting bait
to lead the disturber away. The white outer feathers in the
tail are not often clearly visible when the bird is standing,
but usually may be seen when it flies.
The song of this bird, while perhaps less cheery than that
of the Song Sparrow, is sweeter, and seems to carry farther
as it floats down from the hills after sunset. The bird some-
times sings to greet the rising moon, and even flutters into
the air, like the Skylark, with an exquisite burst of song.
Mr. Burroughs has well named it the Vesper Sparrow. The
ordinary notes are the usual Sparrow-like chips and calls.
In summer most of the food of this bird consists of in-
sects, of which beetles and grasshoppers form the bulk.
Since it frequents pastures, it picks up many dung beetles ;
weevils, click beetles, ground beetles, and leaf beetles seem
otherwise to be preferred to other kinds. Grasshoppers
form the principal food in midsummer ; cutworms are also
eaten, and the bird does good work as an insect eater in
field and garden. It is also useful as a destroyer of weed
seeds, eating less grass seed than some other Sparrows, but
a great variety of the seeds of weeds which it finds in corn-
fields and other fields, and in gardens.
BLACKBIRDS, GRACKLES, ETC.
This family has been mentioned on p. 224, and one of its
members, the Baltimore Oriole, has been described among
the birds of orchard and woodland (see pp. 224—228).
The Rusty Grackle is a mere migrant through the State
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 313
in spring and fall, and is not of much economic value here ;
therefore, its description is omitted. The other species of
the family will be considered here, for they all frequent
meadows, grass fields, or cultivated lands.
The Bronzed Grackle and the Purple Grackle are both
found in the State, but, as they are alike in form, notes, and
habits, they are both known as Crow Blackbirds, and will
not be treated separately.
Purple Grackle. Crow Blackbird.
Quiscalus quiscula.
Length. — Twelve to thirteen and one-half inches.
Adult Male.— Variously purple, green, blue, violet, and bronzy; wings and tail
mainly purplish; dark purplish or steel-blue on neck and breast; back
greenish or bronzy ; iris straw-yellow.
Adult Female. — Similar, but browner.
Nest. — A bulky structure, often built in tall coniferous trees.
Eggs.— Greenish, spotted and streaked with black and brown.
Season.— March to November. (This form intermingles with the succeeding
one.)
Bronzed Grackle. Western Crow Blackbird.
Quiscalus quiscula eneus.
Adult Male. — Similar to above, but body brassy or bronzy; head, neck, and
upper breast mainly steel-blue; wings and tail violet and steel-blue.
Adult Female.— Similar to that of the Purple Grackle. Both the above forms
look black at a distance, and then are not distinguishable from one an-
other; both forms have the tail long.
Nest, Eggs, and Season. — Like those of the Purple Grackle; winters rarely.
These birds, the largest of the family in Massachusetts, find
their normal habitat about meadows or marshes; but they
have taken kindly to civilization, and, where they are not
much persecuted, are common about lawns, fields, and gar-
dens. They may often be seen walking about on Boston
Common or in the Public Garden. They build their nests
in tall shade trees near suburban and city residences or about
cemeteries, and they frequent well-kept lawns. They are
so large and powerful that not even the Sparrow can drive
them out; and if the Sparrows attack their eggs or ydung,
the Blackbirds are not slow to retaliate with effect.
These birds are conspicuous, and when close at hand are
unmistakable. The tail is often held with its outer feathers
upturned like the sides of a boat, particularly when they fly,
314 USEFUL BIRDS.
which they do usually at some height, in rather a labored
manner, keeping about the same level. The ordinary note
is a sort of hoarse, loud chuck, and the song sounds much
like the rather musical creaking of arusty hinge. They have
also a metallic, jangling note, and when a number perch ona
favorite tree and sing in chorus,
the clanging and creaking they
produce are indescribable.
When not disturbed, they
breed in companies, often in
groves of white pine ; but where
they are much shot at, they
separate, and each pair finds a
secluded place for its nest. As
Fig. 140.—Crow Blackbird, male, soon as the young are reared,
erases wee the birds gather in flocks of
hundreds or even thousands, and forage together. In mi-
gration they sometimes travel in immense armies. A great
flight of these birds passed over Concord on Oct. 28, 1904.
From my post of observation, on a hilltop,.an army of birds
could be seen extending across the sky from one horizon to
the other. As one of my companions remarked, it was a
great “rainbow of birds;” as they passed overhead, the line
appeared to be about three rods wide and about one hundred
feet above the hilltop. This column of birds appeared as
perfect in form as a platoon. The individual birds were
not flying in the direction in which the column extended, but
diagonally across it ; and when one considers the difficulty of
keeping a platoon of men in line when marching shoulder
to shoulder, the precision with which this host of birds
kept their line across the sky seems marvellous. As the
line passed overhead, it extended nearly east and west. The
birds seemed to be flying in a course considerably west of
south, and thus the whole column was gradually drifting
southwest. As the left of the line passed over the Concord
meadows, its end was seen in the distance, but the other end
of this mighty army extended beyond the western horizon.
The flight was watched until it was nearly out of sight, and
then followed with a glass until it disappeared in the distance.
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 315
It never faltered, broke, or wavered, but kept straight on into
the gathering gloom of night. The whole array presented
no such appearance as the unformed flocks ordinarily seen
earlier in the season, but was a finer formation than I have
ever seen elsewhere, among either land birds or water-fowl.
It seemed to be a migration of all the Crow Blackbirds in
the region, and there appeared.to be a few Rusty Blackbirds
with them. After that date I saw but one Crow Blackbird.
It was impossible to estimate the number of birds in this
flight. My companions believed there were “millions.”
The character of the food of the Crow Blackbirds is very
wellknown. The large flocks in which they gather in autumn
are very destructive to ripening corn, and some individuals
destroy birds’ eggs or young birds ; otherwise, in Massachu-
setts the birds are largely beneficial. They sometimes pull
up a little sprouting corn, but are not nearly so destructive
in this respect as the Crows. Dr. Warren tells of the dis-
section of thirty-one birds that were shot in a Pennsylvania
cornfield : nineteen showed only cutworms in their stomachs ;
seven had taken some corn, but a very large excess of in-
sects, mainly beetles and cutworms, with earthworms; the
remaining five had eaten chiefly beetles. The Crow Black-
bird industriously follows the plow, and picks up many
beetles, grubs, cutworms, and some earthworms. In spring
and summer its food in Massachusetts is mainly insects.
Nearly twenty-five hundred stomachs of the species have
been examined in Washington. The food for the year was
composed of over thirty per cent. animal and almost seventy
per cent. vegetable matter, which shows that the birds are al-
most as omnivorous as the Crow. Insect food forms twenty-
seven per cent. of the whole. The greater part is taken in
sunmer. Beetles, particularly Scarabeids like the “June
bug” or “rose bug,” Carabids or ground beetles, curculios
or weevils, form a large part of the food. The Grackles
seem to be fond of white grubs, and the stomach is often
packed with these insects. Grackles are not so skillful in
digging them out as is the Robin, but they are sly enough
to snatch the grub away from the Robin when he has secured
one. They are very destructive to grasshoppers and locusts,
/
316 USEFUL BIRDS.
which in August make over twenty-three per cent. of their
food, and are found and eaten by them in nearly every month
of the year. A good many caterpillars are eaten, mainly
those species that are found on the ground, such as cutworms
and army worms ; but the birds flock to caterpillar outbreaks,
eating both hairy and hairless species. Crow Blackbirds de-
stroy both gipsy moth and brown-tail moth; bugs, ants, and
spiders are eaten also. Mice, birds and eggs, frogs, lizards,
salamanders, snakes, fish, crustaceans, mollusks, and snails
form a portion of the Grackles’ food. The vegetable food,
beside corn and other grains, consists of rather a small quan-
tity of fruit, mainly wild seeds, nuts, acorns, and weed seed.
Seventy per cent. of the food of the young birds consists
of insects similar to those eaten at the same season by their
parents.
To sum up: the Crow Blackbirds, though destructive to
corn and to a less extent to other grain, are indispensable
because of the vast amount of insects they destroy. In the
west they are so numerous that the farmer often must defend
himself against them; but in Massachusetts their destruc-
tion is not often necessary, and they are seldom shot by
husbandmen except when gathered in flocks among the corn.
Meadowlark. Old-field Lark. Marsh Quail.
Sturnella magna.
Length. — Ten to eleven inches.
Adult.— Upper parts brown, with many dark-streaked, pale-edged feathers; tail
short; outer tail feathers largely white; a light line through middle of
crown; a light line over eye, yellow from eye to bill, and dark streak
behind eye; below, chiefly yellow, with a large black crescent on breast.
Adult in Winter. — Redder above; lower parts duller.
Young. — Under parts paler; crescent replaced by a few black markings.
Nest. — On the ground in a field; usually arched over.
Eggs.— White, with brown spots.
Season. — Resident.
This handsome and well-known bird is a common summer
resident of Massachusetts, and often remains all winter in
seasons when there is little snow, or in favored localities.
In the southeastern part of the State, especially in Barnsta-
ble County, it may usually be seen in winter in sheltered
situations on marshes or meadows. During and after snow-
‘
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 317
storms it becomes quite domesticated, and seeks food along
roads and about dooryards and poultry houses; but ordinarily
the Lark is a shy bird, and keeps well out of gunshot in the
open fields. This species has learned caution in the north
because of continual persecution by gunners; but I have
seen Meadowlarks as tame as Sparrows in the pine barrens
of southern Florida.
The Lark is a bird of the meadows, as its name implies;
but it also frequents dry fields, and sometimes may be seen
perched high in a tree on some
hilltop, from which it sings its
clear refrain. Old fields are
favorite nesting places, probably in
part because the dead and uncut
grass offers concealment for the nest,
and in part because in such fields the
nest is undisturbed by the mower.
This bird is an adept at concealing
its nest, which sometimes has a cov-
ered approach. It resorts to strata-
gem to puzzle the searcher. When Fig. 141.—Meadowlark,
the female comes from or goes to aaah cans
the nest she often runs through the grass for some distance,
and seldom flies to it directly. Mrs. Irene G. Wheelock,
in recording her attempts to find a nest, states that the male
carried butterflies and dragon flies time after time to a point
one hundred yards from the nest, in an apparent attempt to
befool the searcher.
Its flight is an alternation of fluttering and slow sailing,
and it usually shows its white tail feathers often, especially
on rising and alighting. When on the ground it does not
hop like the Robin, but walks more like the Crow, occasion-
ally opening and closing its tail, showing the white feathers
conspicuously. :
Its common alarm note is a rather sharp chatter, not loud,
but shrill, which often follows or precedes a long, pierc-
ing call. The ordinary song is a rather plaintive but pleas-
ing whistle of a few notes, the last usually held for several
seconds. This song is uttered either from the ground, from
318 USEFUL BIRDS.
a perch, or while the bird is on the wing. Rarely a talented
individual soars aloft, uttering an ecstatic flight song, which
compares favorably with that of the most celebrated song-
sters. J have heard this in full volume but once, and then
found it difficult to believe that it came from the throat of a
common Meadowlark. It was not at all suggestive of that
bird’s ordinary song, except in some of the last notes, nor
did it in the least resemble that of the Western Meadow-
lark ; it more resembled the music of the Bobolink, but was
louder and not so hurriedly given.
The Meadowlark is now quite generally protected by law
at all times, and no bird more fully deserves such protection.
It is practically harmless, and takes nothing that is of any
use to man except a few small grains and seeds. On the
other hand, it is one of the most useful birds of the fields,
perhaps the most valuable. In summer almost ninety-nine
per cent. of its food consists of insects and allied forms. It
eats about all the principal pests of the fields, and is particu-
larly destructive to cutworms, hairy ground caterpillars, and
grasshoppers. In summer it gets but few seeds, but in fall
and winter it takes many weed seeds. It visits weedy corn-
fields and gardens in search of ragweed and other seeds, of
which it devours enormous quantities, which make up about
one-third of the food for the year. Even in winter it pre-
fers insects when it can get them. Mr. C. W. Nash says,
in his “Birds of Ontario,” that several specimens shot in
winter contained only insects, taken about market gardens.
Professor Beal says that even in December and January the
insect components of the food are thirty-nine and twenty-
four per cent., respectively ; and in March, when insects are
still hard to obtain, the quantity rises to seventy-three per
cent. Professor Beal makes an ingenious and very moderate
estimate, from which he concludes that twenty-five dollars’
worth of hay is saved annually in an ordinary township
by Meadowlarks, through their destruction of grasshoppers,
and he values hay at only ten dollars per ton. When we
consider that grasshoppers, green grasshoppers, locusts, and
crickets all together form twenty-nine per cent. of the food
of this bird for the year, and that it is almost entirely in-
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 519
sectivorous by preference, and when we consider also the
additional injury that must occur were the insects and their
progeny allowed to increase through a lack of Meadowlarks,
the value of the bird becomes evident.
Red-winged Blackbird. Marsh Blackbird.
Agelaius pheniceus.
Length.— About nine and one-half inches.
Adult Male. — Black, with a light-edged scarlet patch at bend of wing; often
only the light edges of this patch show when the wings are closed.
Adult Female.— Smaller; grayish-brown, streaked heavily with dark brown or
blackish. :
Young. — Similar to female.
Nest. —In grass or bush; rarely in a tree?
Eggs.— Pale bluish, with spots and scrawls of darker colors and black.
Season. — March to August.
Few birds are better known than the Red-winged Black-
bird. Almost every small bog hole or swamp about the farm
harbors a pair or more of these birds. They are common
about ponds and meadows. The
males arrive in flocks, usually in
March, and sometimes may be
heard singing gaily while the ground
is still deeply covered with snow.
Their song is as characteristic a sign
of spring as is that of the early wood
frog, and their notes have something
of the same quality. They carry ;
. Fig. 142. — Red-winged Black.
a suggestion of boggy 00ze. The bird, male, one-half natural
common note is a single chuck, and = 5!
the ordinary song resembles the syllables guong-ka-rece’, the
first two uttered quickly. Some individuals have a more
musical song, ending with a jingle akin to that of the
Bobolink.
Although the Red-wings almost invariably breed in the
swamp or marsh, they have a partiality for open fields and
plowed lands; and most of the Blackbirds that nest in the
smaller swamps adjacent to farm lands get a large share of
their. food from the farmer’s fields. They forage about the
fields and meadows when they first come north in spring.
Later, they follow the plow, picking up grubs, worms, and
320 USEFUL BIRDS.
caterpillars; and should there be an outbreak of canker-
worms in the orchard, the Blackbirds will fly at least half a
mile to get cankerworms for their young. Wilson estimated
that the Red-wings of the United States would in four months
destroy sixteen thousand, two hundred million larve.
They eat the caterpillars of the gipsy
moth, the forest tent caterpillar, and
other hairy larve. They are among the
most destructive birds to weevils, click
beetles, and wireworms. Grasshoppers,
ants, bugs, and flies form a portion of
Fig. 143.—Red-wingea the Red*wings’ food. They eat com-
Blackbird, female, about paratively little grain in Massachusetts,
although they get some from newly sown
fields in spring, as well as from the autumn harvest; but
they feed very largely on the seeds of weeds and wild rice
in the fall. In the south they join with the Bobolink in
devastating the rice fields, and in the west they are often so
numerous as to destroy the grain in the fields; but here the
good they do far outweighs the injury, and for this reason
they are protected by law.
Cowbird. Cow Blackbird. Cow Bunting.
Molothrus ater.
Length. — Seven and one-half to about eight inches.
Adult Male. — Lustrous black, with a rich, lustrous brown head and neck.
Adult Female. — Brownish-gray, slightly darker on wings and tail.
Nest. — That of some other bird.
Eyggs.— White, speckled all over with brown.
Season. — April to October.
This much-maligned bird, which builds no home of its
own, and depends on others to hatch and rear its young, is,
nevertheless, an essential part of nature’s plan. Birds that
rear their own young are confined by necessity to a certain
radius about their nests; but the scattered bands of Cowbirds
form a wandering, unattached light squadron of insect de-
stroyers, which all summer long can go wherever their pres-
ence is most needed. In the warmer months of the year they
feed almost entirely on insects, but during the colder months
they live on seeds.
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 321
Throughout the season the sexes intermingle promiscu-
ously, from the time the females arrive in the spring. As
usual with other species, the males come first, and may be
seen singly, in small flocks, or with other species of Black-
birds. They perch in the tops of tall trees, and their only
song is a long, thin whistle, high keyed and little varied.
The common note is a chuck.
The females soon arrive from the south, and then flocks
may be seen in which they usually predominate. The eggs
are deposited from April to June, in the nests of other and
usually smaller birds. An egg is dropped slyly when the
owner of the nest_is absent, and generally after she has laid
some of her own. Sometimes the little foster mother refuses
to adopt the offspring of another, and abandons the nest,
or builds another nest above the first one; but usually she
good-naturedly settles down upon her nest to incubate.
The Cowbird’s egg is larger than those of the foster mother,
and is commonly deposited in the center of the nest. Per-
haps it gets more heat than the other eggs, for it hatches first.
The young Cowbird grows faster than the other chicks, and
gets about all the food. It is soon able to dislodge its smaller
and weaker foster brothers and sisters, who perish ; then the
young Cowbird monopolizes the entire time and care of its
foster parents. It is no uncommon thing to see a small War-
bler or a Chipping Sparrow feeding a young Cowbird twice
its own size; but as soon as the stranger is well able to
shift for itself, it joins a flock of its own species.
Grasshoppers seem to be its favorite animal food, but leaf
hoppers, also very destructive to grass, are freely taken.
Undoubtedly. the Cowbird is of great benefit to pastures,
where it follows the cattle about, picking up insects that
start up around them. Weevils and curculios are commonly
eaten ; also caterpillars, but to a less extent than other Black-
birds eat them. Cowbirds take wasps, ants, and flies in small
quantity, and a number of spiders. Vegetable food, however,
forms the main part of the Cowbird’s subsistence in spring
and fall, and, according to Professor Beal, it constitutes
nearly seventy per cent. of all the food for the year. A
large part of this, however, is weed seed, of which the seed
322 USEFUL BIRDS.
of ragweed, barn grass, and panic grass form probably the
greatest portion ; but the Cowbird eats more grain than the
Red-winged Blackbird. Undoubtedly its food habits are on
the whole beneficial ; but, as every Cowbird is reared at the
expense of the lives of at least two other birds, the reputa-
tion of the species suffers accordingly, and its social habits
are certainly not exemplary, if judged by human standards.
Bobolink. Skunk Blackbird. Reed Bird. Rice Bird.
Dolichonyx oryzivorus.
Length. — About seven and one-fourth inches.
Adult Male.—In spring and early summer, mainly black; nape creamy buff;
streaks on upper back grayish-white ; shoulders and lower back ashy-white ;
in August and September the plumage resembles that of the female.
Adult Female and Young. — Upper parts brown, dark-streaked; lower parts
yellowish-brown, unstreaked.
Vest. —On ground, in grass.
Eggs.— Gray, spotted with brown and overlaid with dusky streaks, blotches,
and scrawls.
Season. — May to September.
The Bobolink is the harlequin of the spring meadows. He
is a happy-go-lucky fellow, with his suit on wrong side up,
the black below and the white above ; a reckless, rollicking
sort of a fowl, throwing care
to the winds, and always
bent on a lark. His spirits
are of the effervescent kind,
and his music bubbles irre-
pressibly forth at such a rate
that half a dozen notes seem
to be crowding upon the
Fig. 144.— Bobolink, male, and army heels of every one uttered.
worm, one-half natural size. Indee d, this is about the onl y
bird that completely baftles the latter-day “interpreters” of
bird music. His notes tumble out with such headlong rapid-
ity, in an apparent effort to jump over each other, that it is
next to impossible for the scribe to set them down in the
proper sequence of musical notation. Nevertheless, this
harum-scarum expression of irrepressible joy is of the most
pleasing character, and ranks among the finest music of the
fields.
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 323
The males chase each other madly, and swiftly pursue the
females over the grass tops; or, sailing with down-bent
wings, pour forth their torrent of music. The alarm note is
a metallic chenk. When the young have been reared, the
males begin to lose their striking dress, the song ceases,
and early in August the Bobolinks are seen flying about
in small flocks, uttering mellow
chinks, as they prepare for their
southern journey.
In May, June, and July insects
form about eighty-five per cent.
of the Bobolink’s food. The bird
is very destructive to grasshop-
pers and caterpillars, particularly to the army worm. It eats
some parasitic Hymenoptera, and this may be looked upon
as a bad habit; but otherwise little fault can be found with
the Bobolink while it remains in the meadows of the north.
In the south, however, the Bobolinks, together with the
Blackbirds, cause an annual loss of fully two million dollars
to the rice growers, and would destroy the whole crop were
not all the hands on every plantation engaged during the
“rice bird” season in shooting or frightening the birds. This
continued shooting undoubtedly has had some effect on the
number of birds breeding in the north, and Bobolinks are
not now so generally common in Massachusetts as they were
forty years ago. They have been reduced some by early
mowing in the nesting fields, but their diminution from year
to year is hardly perceptible.
Fig. 145. — Bobolink, female.
PIGEONS AND DOVES.
This group of birds is now represented in Massachusetts
by but one species, the Mourning Dove, as the Passenger
Pigeon appears to have disappeared, and may now be ex-
tinct. The Mourning Dove, which is often mistaken for it,
is now protected by law at all times, and probably will be
saved from the fate of the Pigeon. Presumably al] the sup-
posed “wild Pigeons” now reported by different observers
in Massachusetts are Mourning Doves.
324 USEFUL BIRDS.
Mourning Dove. Carolina Dove. Turtle Dove.
Zenardura macroura.
Length. — Nearly twelve inches.
Adult Male.— Upper parts mainly grayish-blue, shaded with olive-brown; head
and neck brown, with a bluish overcast; sides of neck iridescent, with red-
dish and golden reflections; a black spot below the ear; outer tail feathers
and wing feathers show bluish when spread; all outer tail feathers have
a black bar and « white tip; tail rather elongated and pointed; lower
parts purplish, changing to yellowish on belly, bluish on sides, and whitish
on chin.
Adult Female. — Similar, but duller.
Young.— Grayer than female; many feathers have whitish edgings.
Nest.— A mere platform of sticks, at a moderate height in a tree, near trunk.
Eggs.— Two; white. ‘
Season. — April to October.
The Mourning Dove was never so abundant in this State
as the Passenger Pigeon, for Massachusetts is near the north-
ern border of its range; still, it was once common where
it is now rare, particularly in western Massachusetts, but it
is now so uncommon generally as to be of little economic
importance. In some parts of Middlesex, Plymouth, and
Barnstable counties it is still common locally in spring
and summer, and its mournful cooing is heard almost daily.
A variety of notes has been attributed to this species,
but I can recall only the “coo,” and a twittering sound that
appears to be made by the wings when it first rises in flight.
This Dove is of no great value as an insect eater, for it
feeds largely on seeds. Wheat, oats, rye, corn, and barley
are all eaten, forming about thirty-two per cent. of the food,
but perhaps three-fourths of this is waste grain picked up
in the fields. Buckwheat is a favorite food. Some grain is
taken from newly sown fields, but the greater part of the
food consists of weed seeds. Nash says that the crops of
these birds are often so full of seeds that, if a bird is shot,
the crop bursts open when it strikes the ground. He says
that bindweed is a favorite food. A Dove that was exam-
ined at the Department of Agriculture was found to contain
ninety-two hundred seeds, mostly those of noxious weeds,
and none of useful plants. This was rather an unusual -num-
ber, but it shows what the bird is capable of doing as a
helper on the farm. .
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 325
GROUSE, PARTRIDGES, ETC.
The Grouse are treated among the birds of orchard and
woodland, on pp. 266-274.
Bob-white. Quail.
Colinus virginianus.
Length. — About ten inches.
Adult Male.—Upper parts mainly reddish-brown, with dark streaks and light
edgings; forehead and broad line over eye white; throat patch white, bor-
dered with black; tail short, gray; crown, upper breast, and neck all round
brownish-red ; breast and belly whitish, narrowly barred and marked with
crescent-shaped black marks; sides reddish-brown.
Adult Female.— Similar, but duller; without the black on the head, and the
white mainly replaced by buff.
Nest.— On ground, among bushes, grass, or grain.
Eygs. — White, often stained with brown.
Season. — Resident.
No bird is more typical of the southern New England farm
than the Quail.! Its clear and mellow call is still a char-
acteristic sound of spring and early summer. The plowman
hears it as he drives his team afield,
and it mingles with the ringing sound
of the whetstone on the scythe.
The Quail is an inhabitant of the
transition zone, and cannot maintain
itself much farther north than Massa-
chusetts except along the coast, where
the winters are less severe than in
the interior. It gets its sustenance
mainly from the ground ; hence, when Fig. 146.—Bob-white, one-
the earth is deeply covered with snow paneer
its food is hard to obtain, and many Quail are starved or
frozen under the snow during hard winters, as was the case
during the winter of 1903-04. Such winter killings occur
many times during a century, and the birds have always
partially recovered their lost ground; but unless they can
receive absolute protection for a series of years after such
seasons their recovery will be rendered increasingly difficult,
1 The name Quail is a misnomer, for the bird is not a Quail, but more nearly a
Partridge, as it iscalled in the south. It resembles the Quail of Europe, hence
the New England name, which will undoubtedly “stick.”
326 USEFUL BIRDS.
on account of the great accession to the number of gunners.
The Quail is not easily extirpated, for, unlike the Wood-
cock, it waits until the weather is mild before beginning its
nest; and it is very prolific, and sometimes rears more than
one brood in aseason. From twenty-four to forty-two eggs
are said to have been found in a single nest, but these were
probably the product of more than one bird.
The pure strain of the old race of Massachusetts Quail is
believed to have been practically eliminated by shooting and
winter killing, and most of the birds now existing in the
State are supposed to represent a mongrel race, — an admix-
ture of the blood of Massachusetts birds and those of the
south and west. Some naturalists assert, however, that no
introduced southern birds survive their first winter in Massa-
chusetts ; but Mr. H. H. Kimball, secretary of the Massachu-
setts Fish and Game Protective Association, who has been
instrumental in introducing and “planting” many of these
birds, has trustworthy evidence that in some cases at least
they have wintered well and become established.
The breeding season of the Bob-white extends through May,
June, and July, and the males may be heard calling occasion-
ally as late as the first of October. According to Dr. Judd,
Mr. Robert Ridgway found a clutch of freshly deposited
eggs in a nest in southern Illinois on October 16, and H.C.
Munger found another set in Missouri in January. The
parent bird was found, later, frozen on the nest. This seems
to indicate a latent tendency, like that of the domestic fowl,
to lay eggs at any season of the year, —a trait which might
give added value to the species in domestication. The nest
is usually made in grass land, in some old field, or in a
bushy thicket along its border, and is often well concealed.
Young Quail are said to run about the moment they are
hatched. While this may be an exaggeration, probably all
the eggs in a litter are hatched at about the same time, and
the young birds are able to leave the nest very soon after-
ward. The first downy chicks are usually seen in July.
They are very small, and are streaked somewhat like Bantam
or Brown Leghorn chicks. Their protective coloring is such
as to render them invisible when motionless on the ground,
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 327
where they squat with closed eyes at the first danger signal.
The driver of my heavy farm wagon saw a mother bird one
day in the road before him. He stopped the slow team at
once, but too late to save three of the young that, hidden in
the rut, had been run over by the wheels. He found and
picked up a live one squatted there.
All through the breeding season the common call of the
male, “ Bob-white,” or “ Bob-Bob-White,” may be heard,
particularly just before a rain, and the farmers translate the
cry as “ More-wet,” or “Some-more-wet.” At a distance
this call is a clear whistle. Dr. Judd says that when uttered
within ten feet of the hearer it loses its melody and becomes
a mere nasal shriek. At the approach of danger the bird
can reduce the volume of sound at will, so that when it
stands within twenty or twenty-five feet of the listener its
whistle seems to come from a point many rods away, — an
accomplishment which I have heretofore noted as possessed
by other birds. The call when thus subdued is of exactly
the same tone and pitch as usual, quite as clear, and deliv-
ered in exactly the same way. So far as my observations
go, the bird when calling sits or stands
in its usual position, throwing up its
head slightly in enunciating “Bob,”
and then throwing it well back and
pointing the bill skyward when utter-
ing the “white,” as is shown in the
. “Bob,” “ white.”
accompanying figures, after sketches pig. 14°7.—The morning
from the wild bird. call.
Dr. Judd watched a Quail that called in a somewhat simi-
lar manner, except that when three notes were given it de-
pressed its bill almost to its breast in uttering the second.
He thus describes the calls of the mated birds : —
Then followed ‘a series of queer, responsive “ caterwaulings,” more
unbirdlike than those of the Yellow-breasted Chat, suggesting now the
call of a cat-to her kittens, now the scolding of a caged gray squirrel,
now the alarm notes of a mother Grouse, blended with the strident cry
of the Guinea Hen. As a finale, sometimes came a loud, rasping noise,
not unlike the effort of a broken-voiced Whip-poor-will.
328 USEFUL BIRDS.
When the broods are scattered by the gunner, they are
reassembled again by a whistled call of the old bird, which
has been given, “ka-loi-kee, ka-loi-kee,” and is answered by
the whistled, repeated response, “whodl kee.” The syllables
are almost run together. The first call is uttered with a
rising and the other with a falling inflection. It is plainly
the rallying call and answering cry. When the scattered
covey gets together, musical twitterings are often heard.
At night they repair to some favorite locality, where they
sleep on the ground in a ring, heads out and shoulder to
shoulder. In this formation there are always some birds to
face and discover danger, upon whichever side it approaches.
One spring into the air gives each bird wing room, and off
they fly in all directions, an animated “feathered bombshell,”
exploding in the darkness with a roar of pinions sufficient to
startle and possibly baffle an enemy, as the belated traveller
who has happened to disturb them at night will attest. They
sometimes gather into the same formation in the daytime.
In Massachusetts the birds usually roost in thickets, black-
berry tangles, or woods, and often use the same roosting
place for several nights in succession. They feed largely in
fields, gardens, and cultivated land ; but when pursued they
often take to the swamps or woods, where they perch in trees,
usually on the side farthest from the pursuer, sitting upright
on the branches or crouching close to the trunk. Their
habits during the shooting season are well known. A great
deal of ink has been used in discussing the question whether
the Quail is able to “hold its scent,” as it is a well-known
fact that dogs are frequently at fault in trailing this bird.
When the dog is alone, the bird, even in open ground,
apparently gives itself little uneasiness, but simply settles
quietly down where it stands until it lies flat on its breast,
with head drawn down so close to the shoulders that it
might well pass for a brown clod. It remains thus, allows
the dog to pass within a few yards or even a few feet, and
keeps quiet until all danger is past. But let a human being
appear, and much greater precautions are taken. I have
seen a bird in open ground run and hide in a slight hol-
low, or conceal itself by crouching between two sections of
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 329
a stump. If there are trees near by, it runs quickly and
squats upon the ground behind a tree or close to its trunk.
Its resemblance to its surroundings is so close that it seems
to disappear, effacing itself before one’s eyes like a witch in
a fairy tale, as it flattens itself on the ground... Bob-white
naturally “lies to a dog,” for it seems to have a supreme
contempt for the blundering animal. This apparent con-
fidence in its own invisibility is often fatal, however, where
trained bird dogs are entered against it.
There is some reason to believe that the Quail is migratory
at times. Some people relate that Quail have been seen
flying south in large flocks at the approach of winter ; others
aver that many have been drowned while crossing large
bodies of water; still others tell us that the birds migrate
long distances by running; but every covey that I have been
able to watch has passed the winter not far from the place
where it was reared. These observations have often been
interrupted by the destruction of the entire brood by farmers,
gunners, or sportsmen. A great many broods “migrate” in
this manner, never to return. Still, probably Grouse and
Quail sometimes become restless in the fall, and move about
the country; but it is extremely doubtful if there are any
general movements of either species that can be designated
as autumnal or vernal migrations in the ordinary sense in
which these terms are applied.
The feeding habits of the Bob-white are such that it must
be ranked by the farmer as one of the most useful birds of
field and garden. It is very nearly harmless, as it takes
little grain or fruit. Occasionally in the cornfield it pecks
at a broken-down ear of corn, and it picks up a good deal of
waste grain in the stubble of oats and wheat. It sometimes
eats a few strawberries, but these are evidently not a favorite
food, for birds in captivity have refused them when hungry.
On the other hand, Bob-white, during spring and summer,
feeds on many of the most destructive pests of garden and
field, and in fall and winter eats great numbers of the seeds
of many noxious weeds. Dr. Judd makes some interesting
calculations regarding the quantity of insects and weed seeds
consumed by the Bob-white in Virginia and North Carolina.
330 USEFUL BIRDS.
Estimating that there are four birds to each square mile in
these States, and that each bird consumes half an ounce of
weed seed daily from September 1 to April 1, he concludes
that one thousand, three hundred and forty-one tons are eaten
by Quail annually in the two States; and, as insects form
about one-third of the birds’ food from June 1 to August 1,
he estimates that Quail consume three hundred and forty tons
of insects in these States within those two months.
It is somewhat remarkable that the Quail feeds on most of
the superlatively destructive crop and garden pests of North
America, among them the Rocky Mountain locust, chinch
bug, cotton worm, Mexican cotton boll weevil, army worm,
Colorado potato beetle, striped cucumber beetle, May beetle,
bean leaf beetle, and several species of grasshoppers. More
than one-third of its food for August consists of insects, of
which very few are useful species. The Quail eats many
ground beetles, but mainly those species which feed to some
extent on vegetation, and which become destructive if allowed
to increase unduly. It is probably the most effective enemy
of the Colorado potato beetle. A correspondent wrote me
that he had watched the Quail feeding on potato beetles and
other insects on his farm, and believed that each bird raised
on his place was worth five dollars to him as an insect killer.
He declines to allow any more Quail to be killed on his
farm. Dr. Judd says that Mr. C. E. Romaine of Crockett,
Tex., wrote that Quail were nesting about his fences and
even in his garden, and had kept his potato patch entirely
free from the “Colorado potato bug.” From seventy-five
to over one hundred potato beetles have been found in
Quails’ stomachs. Clover-leaf beetles, corn-hill bugs, wire-
worms, and many other beetles and larve are eaten. Pro-
fessor Aughey found five hundred and thirty-nine locusts in
the stomachs of twenty-one birds, or an average of twenty-
five apiece. The Bob-white not only finds many cutworms,
but picks up the parent moths, as well as ants, flies, and
spiders.
The young are at first fed, almost entirely on insect food.
Mr. Nash says they eat their own weight of insects daily.
As an insect eater the Quail is worth its weight in gold to
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 331
the farmer and gardener. If it could be protected and in-
creased in numbers, and if it could be allowed to come con-
fidently about the farmstead, perhaps it would become the
most useful bird of the garden.
In late spring and early summer its vegetable food is
largely confined to such seeds as it can pick up, and to
green grass, chickweed, sorrel, clover and other succulent
leaves, and some buds. In the perennial problem of weed
destruction there is no greater ally of the farmer than this
bird. It eats the seeds of over sixty species of weeds.
Seeds form over one-half its food, and among them the rag-
weed seems to be the favorite. As many as two hundred to
three hundred seeds of smartweed, five hundred of the red
sorrel, seven hundred of the three-seeded mercury, and one
thousand of ragweed have been eaten at a meal. According
to Dr. Judd, five thousand seeds of green foxtail and ten
thousand of pigweed have been found in a single bird. As
the fall advances, Quail find acorns and pine seed in the
woods, and in the thickets they seek wild fruit that nature
provides for winter bird-fare. Although the Quail feed by
preference on the ground in winter, when the snow is deep
they seek shelter in tangles and thickets, where wintering
berries grow. Wherever the ground is swept bare of snow
by the wind the Quail wander about, feeding on dried leaves
of plantain and other plants, with such weed seeds and dried
grasses as they can find. Mr. William Brewster tells me that
the native Quail of New England eked out an existence on
the berries of the red cedar when the snow lay deep on the
ground, but that the introduced Quail apparently have not
acquired the habit, and so succumb more readily to the New
England winter. From all the studies made regarding the
food of the bird, it is clear that the farmer should never
shoot it, or allow it to be shot on his land. If the Massa-
chusetts market must be supplied with Quail, they must be
reared artificially, for the time is coming when no Quail can
be obtained from other States. The laws of most States
now prohibit their shipment to’ other States, and there are
not birds enough here to supply a tenth of the demand.
D
332 USEFUL BIRDS.
PHEASANTS.
Pheasants are closely related to the Pea Fowl and the
Domestic Cock. They are natives of Asia, but several
species have been introduced into England and America.
Ring-necked Pheasant.
Phasianus lorquatus.
Length. — Varying according to length of tail, but reaching three feet.
Adult Male. — Head and neck dark, burnished blue, with reflections of other
shades; a white ring around neck; back orange-brown to reddish, with
black and other variegations; breast coppery-chestnut, with purplish
edgings and some greenish gloss; tail olive-brown, with red-purplish
edgings, and crossed with blackish bars; bare skin of head scarlet.
Adult Female. — Smaller ; tail shorter, and general plumage brown, marked with
blackish.
Young. — Similar to female.
Nest.— On ground.
Eggs.— Similar to those of a small domestic fowl.
Season. — Resident.
The Ring-neck was first imported into Oregon from China,
and was introduced into Massachusetts from the Pacific coast
in 1894 by the Massachusetts Commissioners on Fisheries and
Game, who have since propa-
gated the birds and liberated
them in various parts of the
State. It was brought to
this country under the name
of Mongolian Pheasant, but
is quite distinct from that
species, to which it has only a general likeness. When its
acclimatization here was proposed, I wrote the late John
Fannin, then curator of the Provincial Museum of British
Columbia, inquiring whether the Pheasants which had been
introduced there had proved injurious to native birds or
farm crops. He replied that on Vancouver Island, where
Pheasants were then numerous, they had driven the Grouse
to the woods; but that this did little harm, as Grouse were
naturally wood birds, while the Pheasants were birds of the
open country. They were doing some damage to crops,
but this had not caused any cry for their abatement, and
the people generally considered them a valuable acquisition.
Fig. 148.— Ring-necked Pheasant.
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 333
In 1897 Mr. F. H. Mosher confined two adult birds at
Malden. They were given some choice of food, and were
fond of grain, weed seeds, vegetables, fruit, and insects.
They ate seventy full-grown gipsy.moth caterpillars in half
a day. Within another half day they ate one hundred and
eight ege-bearing female gipsy moths. No young birds
could be secured for experiment.
In 1903 complaints began to come in that Pheasants were
injuring crops and killing game birds. Circulars sent out
to three hundred correspondents in different parts of the
State brought replies regarding these birds from over two
hundred people. A considerable number of correspondents
had never heard of the species in their vicinity. Forty-two
stated that the bird was not then present in their sections.
Thirty asserted either that it was very rare in their vicinity
or had disappeared. Pheasants were reported as numer-
ous only near Winchester, where the State pheasantry was
located, in a few other places where they were being bred,
and in portions of Essex County, where they had an oppor-
tunity to breed on large estates on which no gunning was
allowed. Forty-five persons stated that Pheasants were
doing no injury to crops or game birds. Three persons com-
plained that Pheasants were killing Bob-whites and Ruffed
Grouse; and nine asserted that Pheasants were injuring
crops, principally corn, tomatoes, peas, beans, cabbages, and
potatoes. Practically all these complaints came from those
few sections where the birds were becoming numerous.
Pheasants have taken more of my sprouting corn than have
either Crows or squirrels. They do not pull it up, as the
Crows do, but dig it up with the beak. In other localities
they are said to “pull more corn than the Crows.” In the
fall they eat what corn they can reach from the ground, and
in Wareham they are said to dig “bushels” of potatoes.
The evidence regarding the killing of game birds was
merely circumstantial. Several reputable persons asserted
that since Pheasants had become common they had found
“both Partridges and Quail with their heads pecked open.”
Other birds of these species were said to have borne evi-
dence of having been slain in combat with a larger bird.
334 USEFUL BIRDS. ~
One man is reported to have seen a Pheasant kill a Par-
tridge. J watched the Quail and Pheasant feeding together
at Wareham, and one day saw a Pheasant strike a Quail
on the head with its beak, exactly as a hen will sometimes
strike and kill a strange chicken. In this case, however, the
Quail escaped, but gave the Pheasant a “wide berth” there-
after. One observer reports that a lady was feeding Quail
in winter, and that a cock Pheasant habitually drove the
Quail away and ate the grain.
Pheasants do much good by destroying insects, and there
need be no fear that these birds will ever become numerous
enough throughout the State to do great harm. Generally
they appear to be unable to hold their own. The common
report is that “Pheasants have been turned loose here, but
have all disappeared.” No eatable bird of the size of a
Pheasant can ever increase much in numbers in Massachusetts
except on land where it can be protected from all shooters.
SNIPE, SANDPIPERS, WOODCOCK, ETC.
Most of the birds of this order, which includes the Plover,
are known as shore birds or marsh birds, and are seen mainly
in migration on the shores of the sea or large bodies of fresh
water. Three species either are, or once were, common
summer residents of this State, and all three go to fields
or cultivated land for a large part of their food. One,
the Spotted Sandpiper, is still quite common; and another,
the well-known Woodcock, may again become so if it can
be protected from excessive shooting. Another still, the
Bartramian Sandpiper or Upland Plover, which was once a
common summer resident of upland fields, has long been on
the road to extermination, and can now be saved only by
enacting and enforcing stringent laws for its protection in
those States where it breeds, as well as in the more southern
States, where the birds find neither rest nor mercy. Most
of the other species of this order, which once migrated along
the coast in countless numbers, are of economic importance
principally as food; but, with few exceptions, the larger
species are so reduced in numbers that they are at present
of little account in any econoniic sense.
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 335
Spotted Sandpiper. Tip-up. Teeter.
Actitis macularia.
Length. — About seven and one-half inches. :
Adult.— Above, olive-brown, ash-tinged; below, white, spotted with rounded
blackish marks; a row of white spots on the wing; outer tail feathers
white-barred.
Young.— Breast unspotted, with a slight grayish cast on white of breast.
Nest.— On ground, on the shore of a pond or river, or in a field or pasture.
Eggs. — Buffy, thickly speckled with dark brown and black; very large for the
size of the bird, and quite pointed at small end.
Season. — April to September.
The Spotted Sandpiper, once a common and familiar bird
along all our ponds and streams, is still fairly common in
suitable localities throughout the State. It is not a gre-
garious species, nor does it travel much along the seashore,
and so it has largely escaped the decimation that many
other Sandpipers have suffered at the hands of the gunner.
It is the only Sandpiper commonly found about inland
waters in June and early July. As it walks it repeatedly
raises and lowers the hinder part of its body with a teeter-
ing motion. This is particularly noticeable when the bird
is alarmed, and uttering its cry of peet-weet, peet-weet. This
note is often repeated when the bird is startled, and may be
heard along the sandy margin of ponds or rivers in the dusk
of evening. Here it wades in, at times up to its belly.
On occasion it can swim well, and sometimes when wounded
and hard pressed it will dive deeply, using its wings and
flying swiftly under water, like a Loon. It often builds its
nest and rears its young in or near cultivated lands, at a con-
siderable distance from any water. The young are able to
run about soon after they are hatched, and they wander away
from the nest, brooded and cared for at need by the mother,
who is very solicitous for their welfare. Their safety lies
in their protective coloring. They are fed largely on insects,
and the parents in summer seem to be very fond of similar
food, which they pick up about cultivated fields. Like all
other birds of the field, this Sandpiper catches grasshop-
pers and locusts. Six of these birds dissected by Professor
Aughey in Nebraska contained ninety-one locusts and one
hundred and forty-two other insects.
336 USEFUL BIRDS.
Bartramian Sandpiper. Upland Plover.
Bartramia longicauda.
Length. — Nearly twelve inches.
Adult.— Upper parts generally light tawny-brown, with dark or blackish mark-
ings; outer tail feathers barred with black and brown, and tipped with
white; inner webs of larger wing feathers barred with black and white;
breast and sides buffy or tawny, marked lightly with blackish; belly
whitish.
Nest.— A mere hollow in the ground.
Eggs.— Buffy or whitish, speckled with dark brown.
Season. — May to September.
This fine, large Sandpiper, commonly called the Upland
Plover, is a bird of the grass-field and pasture. It is not
often seen near the shore, except as it feeds in migration
on the grassy hills of Ipswich and other coast towns, or on
Nantucket, where it breeds. It is a bird of the uplands,
often found breeding in the interior, at long distances from
rivers or ponds, and usually in upland mowing fields. Forty
years ago it bred commonly in considerable areas of the
State, but now it is rare or wanting everywhere in the
breeding season except in a few localities in some counties.
Its note is a melodious, long, rolling whistle, uttered much in
flight. Just after the bird alights it raises its wings high
over its back, stretches them, and then folds them in place.
As the law now protects this bird at all times, it is to be
hoped that its numbers will increase, as it is one of the most
valuable birds of the field. It is an indefatigable insect
hunter, living very largely on such insects as grass-eating
caterpillars and grasshoppers.
American Woodcock.
Philohela minor.
Length. — Ten to twelve inches; bill nearly three inches.
Adult. — Upper parts brown and russet or buff, mixed with gray and marked with
blackish ; back of head black, barred with yellowish; dark line from eye to
bill; under parts pale, warm brown, varying in intensity ; tail black, tipped
with white; eye large, well back and high up.
Nest.— On ground in moist land.
Eygs.— Large, buff-colored, with chocolate and stone-gray spots and markings.
Season. — March to November; rare in winter.
This favorite game bird was once a common summer resi-
dent of this State, but is now becoming rare in the breeding
PLATE XXIX.— American Woodcock. (Photograph from life.) (From American Ornithology.)
BIRDS OF FIELD AND GARDEN. 337
season. It feeds in low, swampy woodland, boring in the
mud for worms, and also in low pastures, where it destroys
many insects. In late summer it often goes to the uplands,
where it feeds in cornfields, asparagus fields, fruit gardens,
and pastures. At such times the bird may be seen among
the currant bushes or vegetables, where in early morning it
feeds with the Robins. When suddenly flushed it sometimes
rises with a tremulous whistling sound, similar to that made
by the wings of the Mourning Dove. Although in summer
it frequents fields, gardens, and pastures, it sometimes for-
sakes them in very dry weather for the wooded shores of
ponds or rivers. The Woodcock evidently feeds much at
night or during the dusk of morning and evening, when
it is almost always active. When startled in the daytime
it is normally sluggish, and rises just over the tops of the
bushes or undergrowth, flutters a short distance, and alights ;
but late in the fall a strong bird that has been hunted and
shot at will start up like a flash and fly wild high and far,
sometimes fanning,the air so rapidly with its wings that they
appear as a mere nebulous haze, like those of the Humming-
bird in flight. Its curious flight song is uttered in the
breeding season, when it rises high in the dusk of evening,
sending back a series of twittering and whistling sounds.
The Woodcock is hunted throughout its range. As it
grows rarer in the north, gunners and sportsmen follow it
south in winter. Great numbers of Woodcock are slaugh-
tered there when all the birds of the species are massed
in a limited area.
Wilson’s Snipe.
Gallinago delicata.
Length. —'Ten and one-half to eleven and one-half inches; bill about two and
one-half inches.
Aduilt.— Upper parts brownish-black, varied with bay and tawny; crown black,
with a light central stripe; upper tail coverts tawny, with dark bars; tail
feathers above bright chestnut, with a black bar near the tip, which is
whitish; beneath, white, but breast and sides tinted with brown, speckled
and barred with dusky.
Season. — Spring and fall.
The Snipe is a not uncommon migrant, and may be found
in favorable localities in late March and April, and again in
338 USEFUL BIRDS.
September and October. It is not an upland bird, but
is seen chiefly in fresh-water meadows and lowlands along
streams. It is sometimes met with in low, moist gardens.
Mr. William Brewster says, in his “ Birds of the Cambridge
Region,” that during exceptionally wet autumns great num-
bers of Snipe occasionally visit the truck farms of Arlington
and Belmont, to feed in the water-soaked fields of corn, pota-
toes, and other crops. As they do ‘not injure the crops, but
probe the ground with their long bills, in search of worms
and larve, it is probable that they do considerable good
at such times. The Snipe when started from the ground
usually goes off in a rather low, erratic course, but when well
up in the air it sometimes makes a long and steady flight.
It may be identified by its long bill. It seems to be some-
what nocturnal, particularly on moonlit nights, when its note
may be heard as it flies about the meadows or runs over
them. Its alarm note is a harsh sca¢pe, and it utters also a
muffled “bleat.” It feeds mainly on worms, grasshoppers,
and other small forms of animal life. This bird’s chief
economic value lies in the delicacy of its flesh, and as an
object of sport it has few superiors.
BIRDS OF THE AIR. 339
CHAPTER IX.
BIRDS OF THE AIR.
There are no birds that so well deserve the designation
“fowls of the air” as those that get their subsistence by pur-
suing flying insects. Eagles and Vultures, Frigate Birds,
Albatrosses, and some other sea birds, are endowed with
great powers of flight, but all must descend to earth or
water for their food ; but Swallows, Swifts, and Nighthawks
win their sustenance from the air. They may be said to
live in the air, as, with few exceptions, they seldom alight
except to rest or to attend to their domestic affairs.
Unfortunately, the precise character of the food that many
of these insect-eating birds procure high in air is not well
known. We see the Swifts and Swallows darting about at
great heights on clear summer days. We know that they
must be catching flying insects ; but what insects are flying
at such a height, and why? They must be winged imagoes.
Have they finished the business of life, and are they then
sporting for a few brief hours in sunlight before death over-
takes them? Are they migrating on the wings of the wind
to fresh fields? Are they useful, or injurious, insects? No
one knows.
When Swallows or Swifts are flying low their food can be
studied, and we have some definite information regarding its
character at such times. They are known to take many
‘parasitic Hymenoptera, but whether these insects are taken
before or after they have propagated, whether most of them
are mainly beneficial, or injurious, parasites, we have little
information. Therefore, the effect produced by this habit
of these birds is not well understood. We know, however,
that many injurious insects, such as flies, gnats, mosquitoes,
moths, beetles, and plant lice, when about to reproduce their
kind, are captured by these feathered skimmers of the air.
We know that the Swallows pursue insects all day, until the
340 USEFUL BIRDS.
twilight Bats come out; that Nighthawks “sweep the sky”
through the later hours of daylight; and that Whip-poor-
wills and Swifts are sometimes a-wing throughout the night.
So that whenever insects are flying there are birds to pursue
them. These birds of tireless pinion cover a wide territory,
and form a most potent check on insect life.
SWIFTS.
The spine-tail Swifts are Swallow-like birds that rarely if
ever alight, except upon their nests or on the perpendicular
sides of chimneys, rocks, hollow trees, or buildings.
Chimney Swift.
Chetura pelagica.
Length. — About five and one-fourth inches.
Adult. —Sooty-brown, paling to gray on throat and breast; tail rather short,
spiny, and somewhat cigar-shaped, fan-shaped when spread; wings black-
ish, long, narrow, and slightly curved.
Nest.— Of sticks, glued to the wall of a chimney, hollow tree, or barn.
Eggs. — White.
Season. — April to September.
The Chimney Swallow, as it is commonly called in the
country, is one of the common sights of the summer twilight
as it flies twittering above trees and house tops. When
building its nest it breaks off twigs from the trees as it flies,
and glues them to the chimney with its own saliva. It is a
most expert insect catcher, and while hawking about for food
for its young fills up its mouth and cheeks with insects,
carrying them much as a chipmunk carries corn. It appears
to be of a playful disposition. I saw a Swift one day in
Concord apparently amusing itself by chasing Cedar Birds,
that were fly-catching, over the river. When a Cedar Bird.
flew out over the water the Swift turned and chased it back
into the trees again, often following so closely as to seem
about to attempt to swallow the frightened and fleeing bird.
Swifts catch flies, small beetles of. various kinds, flying
ants, bugs, grasshoppers, and other insects, and spiders.
A notion exists that these birds introduce bedbugs into
houses ; but so far as I know it has never been proven that
there is any parasite common to both human beings and
birds, with perhaps a single exception, — the woodticks.
, ’ PLATE XXX.— Nighthawk.
PLATE XXXI.— Whip-poor-will.
BIRDS OF THE AIR. 341
NIGHTHAWKS, WHIP-POOR-WILLS, ETC.
Birds of this family are especially fitted for the cap-
ture of flying insects. Their beaks are small and weak, but
their mouths are very capacious, their gullets are large, and
their stomachs,enormous. Some species fly high over open
country ; others live mainly in the woods. Together with
the Owls and Bats they form a night police for the control
of nocturnal insects.
Our two common species, the Nighthawk and the Whip-,
poor-will, are frequently confounded; but in appearance,
habits, and color of eggs they are so different that this mistake
could not be made except by the most superficial observer.
Nighthawk. Bull Bat.
Chardetles virginianus.
Length. — Nine to ten inches. ~
Adult Male.— Above, black, gray, and tawny, mixed and mottled; wings long
and narrow, crossed by a broad white bar which shows best in flight; tail
slightly forked or notched, all except the two middle tail feathers crossed
‘near tip with a white band; throat with a broad band of white; breast
blackish, marked -with gray; other under parts gray (sometimes tinged
with buffy), barred with blackish.
Adult Female. — Similar, but duller; throat band buff; no white on tail.
Eggs.— Laid on bare ledge, rocky ground, or a gravel roof.
Season. — May to September.
The Nighthawk is neither a night bird nor a Hawk, un-
less it may be called a mosquito Hawk. It flies chiefly at
evening, but is seldom heard to cry after dark, and often
may be seen flying about during the greater part of the
day, sometimes at great heights. It has deposited its eggs
on gravel roofs in cities for at least forty years, and prob-
ably longer. It may be seen on summer afternoons hawk-
ing for insects high over the city streets. The usual note
is a s-k-i-r-k or s-c-a-t-p-e, a little like the call of Wilson’s
Snipe, —rather a startling squeak when heard close at hand.
This is the only loud note I have ever heard uttered by
this bird, except the boom which accompanies its sudden de-
scent through the air, and which is supposed to be made by
the wings. The Nighthawk is very devoted to its young,
which, like its eggs, are so protectively colored that they are
342 USEFUL BIRDS.
almost invisible when seen from above as they squat on their
natal rock. The mother either tries to drive an intruder away
by approaching him with open mouth, or feigns lameness and
so attempts to entice him into pursuit.
It is probable that the Nighthawk is one of the most useful
of all birds. It ranks next to the Flicker in the destruction
of ants, and it takes them when they are flying and about to
propagate. Professor Beal estimated that the stomachs of
eighty-seven Nighthawks which he examined “contained not
less than twenty thousand ants, and these were not half of
the insect contents.” One Nighthawk’s stomach held remains
of thirty-four May beetles. Great numbers of grasshoppers
are caught by these birds. Potato beetles, cucumber beetles,
leaf hoppers, bugs, and enormous quantities of gnats and mos-
quitoes have been found in their stomachs. Nighthawks are
absolutely harmless, as they never take fruit or grain, grass
or vegetables. They are protected by law at all times, and
should never be shot or molested. Unfortunately, they are
now rare in parts of this Commonwealth where they were
common years ago.
Whip-poor-will.
Antrostomus vociferus.
Length.— About ten inches.
Adult Male. — Above, finely mottled and barred with black, gray, and yellowish-
brown; wings barred with black and brown, in general browner and not so
dark as the Nighthawk; throat and upper breast blackish; other under
parts buff, marked with blackish; a narrow white band just below throat,
and terminal portion of three outer tail feathers white.
Adult Female. — Similar, but band below throat buff, and tail feathers narrowly
tipped with yellowish-white.
Eggs.— On ground in woods; a creamy white, beautifully marked with shades
of purple or lavender.
Season. — May to September.
In moonlit woods, through dark and shady dells, over
wide pastures, and by the lone farmhouse door the Whip-
poor-will flits softly through the silent night. Its flight
is not as noiseless as that of an Owl; but the bird is even
more mysterious than the Owls themselves. Its night
flight and weird but melodious call have aroused supersti-
tious fancies, until the Whip-poor-will has been accredited
with all sorts of uncanny attributes; nevertheless, it is, like
A Swallow Roost.
PLATE XXXII. —
Tree Swallow.
Barn Swallow.
Cliff Swallow.
Bank Swallow.
BIRDS OF THE AIR. 343
the Nighthawk, one of the most friendly and useful of birds.
Its supposedly ill-omened cry is sometimes heard from the
ridgepole or from the orchard trees. Mr. James Buckham,
in an interesting article in “Zion’s Herald,” calls attention
to the fact that the Whip-poor-will is often a doorstep singer.
It sometimes sits on the broad stone step before the farm-
house door and calls whipogill repeatedly. When close at
hand a soft cluck may be heard after each phrase. The bird
may be distinguished from the Nighthawk by its shorter
wings and long, rounded tail. .
The Whip-poor-will is an animated insect trap. Its
enormous mouth is surrounded by long bristles which form
a wide fringe about the yawning cavity, and the bird flies
rather low among the trees and over the undergrowth,
snapping up nocturnal insects in flight. It is perhaps the
greatest enemy of night moths, but is quite as destructive
to May beetles and other leaf-eating beetles. Hairy cater-
pillars, like the tent and tussock caterpillars, as well as span-
worms, grasshoppers, and ants, are sometimes eaten in large
numbers.
SWALLOWS.
This family of daylight air-coursers has four common
representatives in this Commonwealth. The Purple Martin,
common until within a few years, is now generally rare
except in migration. The illustration of the Swallow roost,
although taken from a sketch made on the Musketaquid, was
nevertheless suggested by Ernest Thompson Seton’s beauti-
ful drawing, now reproduced in Chapman’s “ Bird-Life.” It
shows the four common Swallows, and exhibits their habit
of roosting in reeds. Swallows collect in flocks throughout
the season of migration. In July, as soon as the young are
reared, they begin to flock at night near bodies of water, and
prepare to migrate. Swallows gather in winter in the great
swamps of southern Florida in enormous flights, which, after
uniting in one, discharge into the reeds at dusk. The de-
scent of such a multitude resembles in appearance a great
waterspout topped by an enormous black cloud. In the
morning they scatter out over the country to feed.
344 USEFUL BIRDS.
Bank Swallow.
Riparia riparia.
Length. — A little over five inches.
Adult.— Dull mouse-brown above; white below; a broad brownish band across
the breast; tail slightly forked.
Nest.—In a hole made by the bird in a sand bank.
Eggs.— White. e
Season. — April to August or September.
This bird nests naturally in communities in sand banks
along rivers, where the insects which form its food are plen-
tiful. It early took advantage of man’s habit of digging into
the sand, and probably increased in numbers as roads and
railroads were cut through the country and sandpits opened.
In this State its numbers have now decreased much, owing
partly to the digging away of many banks in which it formerly
bred, but more to incessant persecution by egg collectors, cats,
“English” Sparrows, and other predatory animals. There are
many sand banks in eastern Massachusetts formerly occu-
pied by these birds which now know them no more.
The note is a rather harsh twitter. This bird is almost
entirely insectivorous, feeding on gnats, flies, grasshoppers,
Tortricid moths, and many insects that are injurious to field
and meadow grasses. Plant lice and spiders also form a
portion of its food.
Tree Swallow. White-bellied Swallow. White-breasted Swallow.
House Swallow.
Iridoproene bicolor.
Length. — Nearly six inches.
Adult Male.— Dark irridescent blue-green above; white below; tail slightly
notched.
Adult Female. — Upper parts usually duller.
Young.— Upper parts brown; a faint dusky collar across the upper breast.
Nest. —In hollow tree or bird house.
Eggs. — White.
Season. — April to October.
When the Tree Swallows left their natural homes in hollow
trees to nest in bird houses they probably increased some-
what in numbers; but since the advent of the “English”
Sparrow the Tree Swallows have been driven away from
many of the bird houses in villages and cities where they
BIRDS OF THE AIR. 345
formerly dwelt, and some have gone back to hollow trees.
This bird is still common wherever it can nest unmolested
by the Sparrows, and sometimes, though rarely, it nests in
the same bird house with these impudent foreigners.
Its note is a rather sharp but sometimes musical twitter.
It is probably more useful than the Bank Swallow, for it is
oftener seen about houses and gardens, where it catches flies,
mosquitoes, and gardeninsects. Leaf-eating beetles, canker-
worms, cabbage butterflies, small moths, click beetles, rove
beetles and other beetles, winged ants, and many other flying
insects form part of its food. It usually leaves for the south
in August or September, but sometimes stays much later
where bayberries or sumac berries, upon which it feeds, are
plentiful.
Barn Swallow.
Hirundo erythrogaster.
Length. — Six to seven inches, or a little more.
Adult.— Above, very dark blue; tail deeply forked, showing white markings
when spread; forehead, throat, and upper breast chestnut; lower breast
and belly buff. ;
Nest. — Built of mud, straw, and feathers; usually plastered to a rafter in a barn
or shed.
Eggs.— White, covered with brown spots.
Season. — April to September.
The note of the Barn Swallow brings to mind visions of
fields of waving grass, wide barns, and well-filled mows, for
this Swallow follows the cattle. It is a bird of the pastoral
country, the farm, and the hayfield. Originally it nested
in-caves or on rocky cliffs. The rude barns of the early
settlers offered it abundant safe nesting places, while the
clearing of the land and the increase of cattle augmented the
numbers of its insect prey. Swallows must have multiplied
wonderfully with the settlement of the country, but they
have rather decreased of late years.
The twitter of this Swallow is musical; its flight is the
poetry and grace of motion; its plumage is attractive to the
eye; and its life is largely spent in destroying the insect
foes of the farmer and his cattle. It is particularly servicea-
ble about grass fields. The moths of the smaller cutworms,
those of Arctians and Crambids, are among the injurious in-
sects that it gleans when flying low over the grass. Every
346 USEFUL BIRDS.
one who walks among the tall grass in the fields may
notice how Swallows capture the moths that fly up about
the foot passenger. Prof. C. H. Fernald states that while
he and his friends were walking through the grass at his
home at Mt. Desert several Swallows invariably attended
them and fed on different species of Crambus in abundance.
These observations were continued during several years.
Codling moths, cankerworm moths, and Tortricid or leaf-
rolling moths are gathered from the orchard by the Swallows.
Horseflies, house flies, mosquitoes, gnats, and crane flies are
commonly caught. The only apparently harmful habit that
I have observed is that of picking up parasitic insects in
flight over fields infested with army worms or cutworms.
Cliff Swallow. Eaves Swallow.
Petrochelidon lunifrons.
Length. — About six inches.
Aduilt.— Dark bluish above; forehead cream white and rump light chestnut;
throat chestnut; other under parts whitish ; tail ends squarely.
Nest. — Built mainly of mud, under the eaves of barns or out-buildings.
Eggs.— White, spotted with reddish-brown.
Season. — April to August.
When the first explorers reached the Yellowstone and
other western rivers, Swallows were found breeding on the
precipitous banks. As settlers gradually worked their way
westward the Swallows found nesting places under the eaves
of their rough buildings. In these new breeding places they
were better protected from the elements and their enemies
than on their native cliffs, and so the Cliff Swallow became
the “Eaves Swallow,” and, following the settlements, rapidly
increased in numbers and worked eastward. Audubon saw
them first on the Ohio in 1815. They were seen near Lake
Champlain in 1817, at the White Mountains of New Hamp-
shire in 1818, at Cincinnati in 1819, and in 1830 they had
reached Winthrop and Gardiner, Me. They increased and
spread rapidly over the eastern States, and probably reached
their maximum in numbers from 1840 to 1860. They were
1 Professor Fernald states that the Crambids feed at the roots of grasses, and
that they undoubtedly destroy a large amount of grass without being discovered.
Professor Webster wrote him that in Ohio hundreds of acres of grass had been
destroyed by these moths.
BIRDS OF THE AIR. 347
very numerous in Massachusetts up to about 1865, but since
the introduction of the Sparrow their numbers have been
slowly decreasing here, and now there are large areas where
they do not breed. Apparently they are now more plentiful
than ever in some parts of Maine, and possibly some of the
Massachusetts birds may have migrated there.
Their ordinary note is a rather harsh chirp. Their food
is very similar to that of the Barn Swallow, as they frequent
similar situations. Wherever a colony of these birds is
located they must have a considerable effect on insect life.
They fly much over bogs and meadows, and with the Barn
Swallows are useful in destroying the pests of the grass lands
and cranberry bogs.
Purple Martin. Black Martin.
Progne subis.
Length. — About eight inches.
Adult Male. — Deep, lustrous steel-blue ; wings and tail dark brown; tail slightly
forked.
Adult Female.— Brown above, glossed on head and back with blue or purplish ;
forehead and throat mottled with gray; breast brownish; belly whitish.
Nest. — In a hollow tree or bird house.
Eggs. — White.
Season. — April to August.
Many years ago Dr. Brewer wrote Audubon that an un-
usually cold season had destroyed all the Purple Martins in
the neighborhood of Boston. Since then other occurrences
of this kind have been re-
ported, but there was no per-
manent widespread diminution
in their numbers until the
“English” Sparrows became
numerous. Then the Martins
were gradually driven away,
until they bred only locally, Fig. 149.—Purple Martin, male, about
and had disappeared from a aaa aaa
large part of the State. The June storms of 1903-04
nearly completed their extirpation from the State as breed-
ers, and except in a few favored localities their boxes are
now (1906) all taken by the Sparrows.
The Martin is a southern bird, and caanot long withstand
348 USEFUL BIRDS.
cold storms in the breeding season. It is also one of the
most purely insectivorous of all birds, and feeds almost en-
tirely on winged insects. Therefore, when the air is cleared
of flying insects by long, cold rains or hard frosts, it must
starve. Its note is a full-toned chirruping carol, musical
and clear, beginning peuo-peuo-
peuo. It feeds largely on some of
the greatest pests of the farm.
Rose beetles and May beetles are
caught in large numbers. John S.
Russell writes that a quart of the
wing cases and other rejecta of that
Fig. 150,—Purple Martin, | Common pest, the striped cucumber
ee ‘beetle, were taken from a hole in a
Martin box; and Dr. Packard makes a similar statement.
House flies and flies that trouble horses and cattle are taken
in considerable numbers from the sides of houses and barns.
Mr. Otto Widmann states, in “Forest and Stream,” that
thirty-two parent Martins made three thousand, two hun-
dred and seventy-seven visits to their young in one day,
—June 27, 1884.
Every effort should be made to induce these birds to again
take up their abode throughout the State.
BIRDS OF MARSH AND WATERSIDE.
349
CHAPTER X.
BIRDS OF MARSH AND WATERSIDE.
The birds of wet, waste lands, fresh-water meadows,
marshes, swamps, and the shores of ponds and rivers seem
at first sight to be of no importance from an economic point
of view. Still, most of
QO NW Sy WY mi Pp the Marsh Wrens, Spar-
rows, Herons,
and water-fowl
that live in
Fig. 151.—Salt-marsh caterpillar. This species such localities
is eaten by marsh birds.
i ay
AN
NS
undoubtedly
help to prevent uprisings of such field pests as the
army worms, the green grasshoppers, and the salt-
marsh caterpillars, that sometimes multiply so in
lowlands as to overrun and devastate the upland
crops. The Herons are of some further service
to man, for, besides eating insects, they help to
prevent the undue increase of meadow mice, rep-
tiles, and frogs. Space will not permit detailed
descriptions of the marsh birds and water birds,
but a brief mention may be made of some of the
most important species.
PERCHING BIRDS.
Song Sparrows, Savanna Sparrows, Blackbirds,
Grackles, and Bobolinks, all of which spend more
or less time in wet meadows and marshes, have
already been described. Swifts and Swallows
hawk over meadows, marshes, streams, and ponds,
but the Swamp Song Sparrow or Swamp Sparrow
(Melospiza georgiana) is rarely seen far away from
its favorite marshes or swamps. It is a dark spe-
cies, with a chestnut cap, a whitish throat, and a
Fig. 152.—
_Army
worm,
350 USEFUL BIRDS.
breast unstreaked ; and it sings all summer long about the
bushy margins of grassy swamps and marshes and in the
reeds or bush clumps of river meadows. Its song slightly
resembles that of the Chipping Sparrow, but is more varied
and pretentious. Its sharp chink and busy chirping as it
fusses about its lowly nest greet
the ears of the canoeist as he floats
down the placid stream.
Another bird whose song is
commonly heard along the shores
of marshy rivers is the Long-
DM billed Marsh Wren ( Telmatodytes
Fig. 153.—Swamp Sparrow, about P@lustris). It is found com-
SECURE. monly near streams along the
coast, and up the river valleys of eastern Massachusetts, but
is not so common in the central or western counties except
along the Connecticut River. It sings among the reeds, cat-
tails, and marsh grasses, a voluble, joyous, typical Wren
song, which is kept up all day and may often be heard at
night. It is an unmistakable Wren, with cocked tail and
rapid, nervous motions. The Short-billed Marsh Wren
( Cistothorus stellaris) is one of the smallest of birds. It is
not as common as the other species, and frequents sedgy
meadows and wet lands along brooks. Its song more nearly
resembles that of a Sparrow than that of the typical Wren.
Marsh Wrens build the little globular nests, each with an
opening in the side, that are found among the cat-tails or the
meadow grass.
RAILS.
Rails are confined to the shores of ponds and rivers or to
marshes and wet meadows, where they skulk amid the rushes,
cat-tails, grasses, and water plants, and are more often heard
than seen. The old saying, “As thin as a rail,” might have
originally been applied to these birds, for their bodies are so
thin that they readily slip between the stems of the grasses.
Although no longer as plentiful as in the past, they still
breed here, and many pass through the State in migration.
The two common species are the Virginia Rail (Zallus
virginianus) and the Carolina or Sora Rail (Porzana caro-
BIRDS OF MARSH AND WATERSIDE. 351
lina). The Sora is a dark, handsome bird, nearly as large
as a Quail. It has the forehead, chin, and throat black, an
ashy breast, and a short, yellow bill. The Virginia Rail is
about an inch longer, having a long, curved bill and a light-
colored throat. Many strange notes that are heard on the
marsh at morning or evening or during the night may be
attributed to Rails. Both species nest close to the ground
in marsh or meadow. Thin as the Rails are ordinarily, they
become very fat in autumn, when they are shot in great
numbers for food.
HERONS.
Every pond or stream with shallow waters has its resident
or visiting Herons, and as all species of Herons are now
protected by law, it is hoped that the decrease of the larger
species may be arrested.
Near the seashore and the larger bodies of water a bird
is sometimes seen to rise from the marsh, uttering as it flies
a loud, explosive guock. It is larger than a Crow, has a
blackish back and crown, a short tail, light under parts, and
grayish wings. It folds its long neck, tucks its long legs
up behind, and flies off slowly, its wing tips bending well
downward at every stroke. This is the Black-crowned
Night Heron (Nycticorax nycticorax nevius), which flies
chiefly at evening, but may often be seen abroad in the day-
time, particularly on cloudy days. Young birds are brown
above, streaked and dotted with white, but all have the same
note. They usually nest in communities on trees in swamps.
There is hardly a shallow pond or large stream in the
State, remote from cities, from which one may not flush a
smaller, dark-green bird, with dark, bluish wings, which
rises either silently or with a sharp peok, takes a reef in its
neck, stows its legs, and flies away steadily, keeping at
about the same level. The downward bend to its wing tips
as it flies seems to be even more pronounced than in the
Night Heron. This is the Green Heron (Butorides vires-
cens). It has several peculiar, startling notes, and an ex-
plosive, weird wowoogh, given as if in a stage whisper, that is
sometimes uttered when it is perched onatree. This species
nests in trees, often singly, but sometimes in companies.
352 USEFUL BIRDS.
In early spring, or in August or September, a tall, dark,
lone bird may be seen stalking by some pond, along the sea-
shore, or on tidal flats. It is far larger than other common
Herons, and when it flies sometimes gives utterance to harsh,
loud croaks, and spreads a pair of great wings that seem as
large as those of the Eagle. This unmistakable bird is the
Great Blue Heron or Blue “Crane” (as it is sometimes
wrongly called) (Ardea herodias), which lives largely on
fish, frogs, and meadow mice.
Another species is sometimes started from the grassy
meadow or the marshy fen. This is a large brown bird,
about the size of the Night Heron. The under part of its
neck is distinctly streaked with brown and white, and there
is a black streak on the side of the neck. It is a skulker,
seeking concealment by preference, and flying only when
hard pressed. Its flight is slow and awkward, and it usually
does not fly high or far, but alights again among the grass
or reeds of the marsh. Sometimes on rising it utters sev-
eral harsh, rattling croaks. This is the American Bittern
(Botaurus lentiginosus),—a bird that lives in the bog and |
nests there. It seldom, if ever, alights in trees. Its most
common spring note consists of a series of choking, gurgling
sounds, that resemble the noise made by an old-fashioned
wooden pump, and may be represented by the syllables unk-
a-chunk, repeated several times. This has given the bird
the vernacular name of “plum pud’n.” Sometimes at a
distance only a single note can be heard, which sounds like
the stroke of a mallet on a stake. Hence the name Stake
Driver ; but how it came by the name of Indian Hen I am
unable to say. The Bittern is perhaps the most useful of all
the Herons, for it frequently goes to low fields and pastures,
where it industriously hunts grasshoppers and other Orthop-
tera. A small species, the Least Bittern (Ardetta exilis),
may sometimes be heard cooing in the marshes, but is
seldom seen. The top of the head, back, and tail are black ;
elsewhere the bird is mainly brown, lighter below. It often
sits erect, facing the observer, its bill pointing upward, and
so it is unnoticed among the reeds or flags. Its habits are
little known.
BIRDS OF MARSH AND WATERSIDE. 353
WATER-FOWL.,
We have no means of knowing how many species of
water-fowl once bred about the ponds and rivers of the
State, but there are now but two important species that
breed here in any numbers, and one of these, the Wood
Duck (Aix sponsa) (see frontispiece), is now rapidly grow-
ing rare in most of the State. This bird, of exquisite loveli-
ness, was once the most common wild-fow] that nested along
the shores of our wooded streams and ponds. It is now
protected by statute at all times; but only the most rigid
enforcement of the law can save this, the most beautiful of
American wild ducks, from extermination. It is not as shy
as the Black Duck, and it frequents small ponds and wooded
streams that afford cover to the gunner and can be easily shot
across. The young are hatched in a nest in some hollow
tree or stump, and are often carried to the water by the
mother bird. They are fortunate if they are not all killed
by some gunner as soon as they are big enough for the table.
The bird is harmless, and is at times a great insect eater.
It should be saved from the fate of the Passenger Pigeon,
Heath Hen, and Wild Turkey.
The Black Duck (Anas obscura) is more common, and has
of late somewhat increased in numbers, owing, probably, to
improved and better-enforced laws for its protection. It is
not, as its name implies, a black bird, but is dusky, with a
lighter neck and throat. The under sides of its wings are
also lighter in color. It breeds on the ground, mainly in
marshes and bogs, or on islands in ponds, and is well dis-
tributed in suitable localities throughout the State. It is
normally very destructive to grasshoppers, but in this State
it seldom ventures far from its fastnesses in the bog, except
as it goes to the sea or large bodies of water, which give it a
good outlook and some chance of safety.
The other pond and river Ducks and the Geese are mere
migrants through Massachusetts. The sea Ducks are not
known to be of much value to man except through the
recreation their pursuit affords. The service rendered to
man by sea birds is referred to on p. 80.
354 USEFUL BIRDS.
CHAPTER XI.
CHECKS UPON THE INCREASE OF USEFUL BIRDS.
He who has any doubt about the former abundance of the
larger birds in Massachusetts should read the accounts pub-
lished by some of the earlier voyagers and settlers regarding
the great numbers of water birds, shore birds, game birds,
Hawks and Eagles, Great Auks, Cranes, Herons, wild Swans,
Canada Geese, Snow Geese, Brant Geese, and Turkeys, that
were found in the early years of the colony. We read of
a thousand wild Turkeys reported as seen in a day, of forty
Partridges seen in one tree and sixty Quail in another, of
forty or fifty Ducks killed at a shot, of twelve score shore
birds killed at two discharges of a fowling piece, of flocks of
Passenger Pigeons that obscured the sky to the horizon in
all directions, and of nesting places where for miles the
trees were loaded with Pigeons’ nests.
It is now well known that the Great Auk and the Labrador
Duck have become extinct; that wild Turkeys, Swans, Pas-
senger Pigeons, Cranes, and Snow Geese have practically
disappeared from the State; and that the shore birds, game
birds, and fresh-water Ducks have decreased tremendously
in numbers. No records regarding the increase or decrease
of the smaller birds have been made until within recent
years, and we know only in a general way that certain spe-
cies, like Swallows, Sparrows, and Robins, increased with
and after the clearing and settling of the country, and that
within the last half century there has been a considerable
local decrease of these and other native birds, particularly
about the centers of population.! Also, it is evident that
small birds are not nearly as plentiful here as they are in
1 Director William T. Hornaday of the New York Zodlogical Park estimated,
from reports received by him, that birds had decreased twenty-seven per cent. in
Massachusetts during the fifteen years previous to 1898. The result of my own
inquiries regarding the decrease of birds in Massachusetts was embodied in «
report of one hundred and three pages made to the State Board of Agriculture in
CHECKS UPON INCREASE OF USEFUL BIRDS. 3955
some States farther west, and that they are not numerous
enough to fully control the insects on which they feed.
It is certainly desirable, then, to take measures to increase
the number of useful birds, and any inexpensive means of
accomplishing this end is worthy the most careful consider-
ation of thoughtful people.
When one is asked what controls the numbers of birds,
he finds himself at a loss for a ready answer. There are
many well-understood checks upon their increase ; others
are more obscure. We can understand, for example, why
the larger game birds and shore birds have decreased in
numbers; but it is difficult to see why the Dickcissel or
Black-throated Bunting has disappeared from the Atlantic
seaboard and is now seldom found east of the Alleghanies,
why the Red-headed Woodpecker has so nearly disappeared
from Massachusetts, or why certain resident species as well
as certain migratory species are common one season and
uncommon the next.
To effectually protect birds we must first understand the
chief causes of mortality. among them. Comparatively few
wild birds die from disease or old age. Most of them per-
ish from lack of food, the severity of the elements, or the at-
tacks of their enemies. The destruction of birds by storms,
great and widespread as it is, probably never occurs over
regions extensive enough to utterly exterminate any species.
Their destruction by starvation and cold is usually coextensive
only with the area of severest storm. Under normal condi-
tions the decimated species usually repopulate the country in
a few years. Many young birds are killed by storms in the
nesting season. Many migrating birds are blown into the
sea and drowned. Fortunately for the birds, they are ordi-
narily enabled by migration to avoid the severity of winter ;
but they are unable in this way to escape the destructive
agencies set at work by man along their lines of migration.
In annual, perennial, widespread, and complete bird destruc-
tion, man takes the lead among all other forces of nature.
1905; and as copies of this report—The Decrease of Certain Birds and its
Causes; with Suggestions for Bird Protection — can be obtained of the secretary
of the Board at the State House, its conclusions will not be reiterated here.
356 USEFUL BIRDS.
THE DESTRUCTION OF BIRDS BY MAN.
Man is responsible for the extinction of species or for
their disappearance from great tracts of country. He cuts
down the forest and drives out the larger wood birds. He
destroys the birds that injure his crops or flocks. He intro-
duces animals which destroy birds, and he shoots birds for
food, money, or sport. It is only since civilized man reached
this country that the Great Auk has become extinct, and that
the Passenger Pigeon, which roamed in countless millions
over a continent, has been swept away. It is since then that
the Prairie Chicken, once found in the east, and so plentiful
in Kentucky that it was considered fit food for slaves and
swine only, has been pushed toward the far west. The wild
Turkey has been nearly driven out of the Atlantic States by
man. The White Egret and the Carolina Parrot have almost
disappeared. The Bartramian Sandpiper or Upland Plover,
the Wood Duck, and the Woodcock must follow if not fully
protected. Man exterminates birds for money, little recking
that he is killing the “goose that lays the golden egg.”
The greatest enemies of game birds, and, therefore, the
greatest factors in their extermination, are the epicures, —
the people who buy birds to eat. The marketmen merely
supply the existing demand. The call for game birds has
been so insistent and the price paid for them so remunerative
that marketmen have often organized to defeat legislation for
the protection of game. Observing people who have fre-
quented the markets have read from the butcher’s stall the
story of the decrease of game birds. Within thirty years,
tons of Passenger Pigeons have stood in barrels inthe Bos-
ton market, and men now living can remember when the east-
ern markets were glutted with Quail and Prairie Chickens.
The war of extermination waged on game birds is a blot on
the history of American civilization. It is paralleled only
by the destruction of birds for millinery purposes, which has
some shockingly cruel aspects.
Here again the dealers — the milliners — are not so much
to blame as the public, for the former cater to the wants
of women only as fashion dictates. In civilization we still
CHECKS UPON INCREASE OF USEFUL BIRDS. 357
cling to our rings, beads, and feathers, —the ornaments of
the savage. Within thirty-five years the skins of Bluebirds,
Scarlet Tanagers, and Baltimore Orioles have been in good
demand in Massachusetts for hat ornaments. The brutal
savagery which is characteristic of this phase of bird destruc-
tion has been well illustrated in the extermination of the
Egrets of the United States. Twenty-five years ago these
beautiful birds were abundant in some southern States ;
stragglers occasionally came north as far as New England.
They are shy birds during most of the year, feeding chiefly
in deep swamps and along lonely water courses. In the
breeding season they gather into heronries, commonly called
“rookeries,” where they build their nests. Then much of
their shyness disappears under the stress of providing for
and protecting their young. Unfortunately for them, their
nuptial plumes are perfect in the breeding season. Fashion
demanded the plumes. Nesting time was the plume hunter's
opportunity. There was little difficulty, then, in securing the
birds by shooting them when they were sitting on the nests or
hovering over their helpless young. So the old birds were
shot, the plumes stripped from their backs, and the young
left to starve in the nests or become the prey of Hawks,
Crows, or Vultures. When I was in Florida, in.1878, great
. flights of these birds were seen along the lakes and rivers of
the southern counties. One heronry was estimated to con-
tain three million birds. Ten years later they were rare
everywhere, and now they are practically extirpated. They
have been pursued along the coasts of Mexico and into
Central and South America. The search is extending into
all countries where they may be found. Half-savage Indians
and negroes are enlisted in the slaughter, supplied with guns
and ammunition, and sent wherever they can find the birds.
The misery and suffering entailed can be imagined. Thus
are the “stub” plumes, “aigrettes,” and “ospreys” procured.
They are not manufactured, and, whatever their color when
sold, they were originally stripped from the back, head, or
neck of some white Heron or Egret. The absolute extinc-
tion of these plume-bearing species is assured unless women
will stop wearing the plumes. A similar slaughter took place
358 USEFUL BIRDS.
among the sea birds along the Atlantic coasts. The birds
were shot down on their breeding grounds and their wings
cut off. Many human lives have been lost by reason of
this nefarious business. In 1905 a warden employed by the
National Association of Audubon Societies to protect the
birds was murdered by plume hunters. The reader may be
spared further details of this barbarous trade.
The number of birds killed in the United States each year
before the business was checked by law and public sentiment
cannot: be even estimated, but some figures can be given.
A single local taxidermist handled thirty thousand bird skins
in one year. Og as
. | eae
may readily teach | 4) | %
them to eat from Ear ES BO v4
the hand. Sev- [cabeseuuksuie L SEA
eral other species Fig. 160.—The birds’ Christmas tree at the author’s farm.
may be enticed to house. (From Bird-Lore.)
our windows, where their habits and manners may be studied
in comfort even in the most blustering winter weather. We
accomplished this as follows: small shrubs or branches of
trees were fastened upright on each window sill, extending
over the entire window, and fastened at each side to the
window frame, as shown in Fig. 159. To these branches
pieces of meat were attached, about a foot apart. The suet
382 USEFUL BIRDS.
should be wound on firmly with string or wrapped in wire
netting, so that it cannot be carried off bodily. At first the
birds would come only one at a time, but when they became
accustomed to this method of feeding, four or five birds would
feed together at a window. ~ Chickadees usually came first,
Nuthatches and Downy Woodpeckers next, and Blue Jays
last. .
While these birds were being enticed to the windows, the
Sparrows were fed with seeds and crumbs thrown out upon
the snow. Next, a
shelf or table four and
one-half feet long and
two feet wide was made .
of rough box boards.
This was bound round
with a narrow cleat and
covered with burlap,
to prevent seeds and
crumbs from blowing
off. A little pine tree
was next set up in the
centre of the food table,
the table or shelf was
fastened under a win-
dow sill on the south
| side of the house, vari-
ous food materials were
attached to the tree and
spread upon the table, and the “ birds’ Christmas tree” was
ready.
The Chickadees came to it at once, and the first snow-
storm brought the native Sparrows. At first there was quar-
reling among them, as all wanted to feed at once, and both
tree and table were small ; but necessity finally brought about
more amicable relations, and at last many birds of different
species would feed together. At first the Sparrows were
shy, and flew off at the first movement made by any one
inside. Later, one could sit by the window and see perhaps
eight or ten birds of three or four species busily feeding, a
un)
Fig. 161.—The birds’ tepee. (From Bird-Lore.)
PLATE XLV.—Chickadees seen on a Frosty Morning, through Author’s
Window.
PLATE XLVI.—A Red-breasted Nuthatch at the
Window. (Photograph, from life, by C. Allan
Lyford.)
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 383
few feet away. Quick motions on the part of the observer
should be avoided. If the birds are shy, a lace sash curtain
may be put up. They cannot see through this, and may be
watched at leisure.
We have fed the birds in this way for years. A flock of
Juncos and Tree Sparrows and two Fox Sparrows remained
about our house through the hard winter of 1903-04. Many
Jays came to the trees near by, and some to the windows.
Crows came within twenty yards of the house. Myrtle
Warblers occasionally came to the windows. Downy Wood-
peckers, two species of Nuthatches, Flickers, Creepers,
Kinglets, Crossbills,
Robins, Grouse, Quail, [
and Pheasants were seen
about the house from time
to time. A large dry
goods box in which grain
and chaff were scattered window’
was set out on the north a
side of the house. This
box was open only on the
south side. The Quail -
and Pheasants soon found
it. Then it was moved
daily a little nearer the
house, until the birds had 7#103-—- Pane
learned to feed about the
door-yard.1_ The presence of so many birds gave a healthy
stimulus to observation, and served to break the monotony
of winter isolation on the farm. While in the bleaker por-
tions of the State it may not be possible to assemble so
many, some may be attracted anywhere.
Even our city friends who try this plan need not despair
of seeing, now and then, besides the ubiquitous Sparrow,
some of the wild birds of field and woodland. In many lo-
sLight spring
iat
=
\ B cs 6's aft
Hilge .
ve Board 10"long by 6° high
1 It is of the utmost importance to provide food and shelter for Quail in winter.
An old box or barrel, a shelter of rails in a fence corner, or a “‘ birds’ tepee” of
bean poles, any one of which is kept supplied with a little grain, may carry
through a severe winter Quail enough to stock a whole township by their increase.
384 USEFUL BIRDS.
calities the swarming House Sparrows will come to the feast
and drive the native birdsaway. A hinged shelf (Fig. 162)
supported by a light spring, which has been designed by a
contributor to Bird-Lore, is believed to be Sparrow-proof.
This method of feeding gives an opportunity to see what
foods are selected by wild birds when given their choice.
It is interesting to note that the birds at our windows have
not learned to eat bread except in the shape of fine crumbs.
When birds learn that bread is good, they will eat it from
the loaf. Many kinds of food may be utilized; doughnuts,
frozen milk, pork rind, nuts, and seeds all find favor with
the birds. Jays prefer chestnuts and corn. Sand and coal
cinders give birds the wherewithal to grind their food when
snow covers the usual supply of material on the ground.
Every family living in the country in winter needs the
pleasure and community of interest to be had in thus cater-
ing to the wants of the birds. Each farmhouse should have
at least one window shelf for them. We should teach the
children to feed them and watch for them. Thus we may
benefit both child and bird, and gain pleasure and profit for
ourselves.
Attracting the Summer Birds.
The term “summer birds” may be defined as including
all summer residents, or those birds which remain through
the summer to breed. In winter we have only to offer food
to the birds to attract them; shelter and protection will
retain them; but in summer birds must have food, water,
protection, and a home. Food in quantities they always
need, especially when engaged in rearing their young.
Nature provides this in summer, but we may help them
even then by putting out favorite foods. The supply of
suet should be kept up until hot weather, and it is better
to continue it all summer, for its presence may decide some
of the resident birds to remain and nest near the house or
in the orchard. The male Chickadee will take suet to feed
to his sitting mate, and the parent birds will take it for a
part of their own food while feeding their young mainly on
insects.
If we wish to attract useful birds to the garden, it is well
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 385
to begin to feed birds when they are migrating in April,
by scattering a little cracked corn, oats, wheat, barley, or
millet seed in the yard near the garden or along the garden
paths. This may attract Sparrows, Thrashers, and Black-
birds, some of which may decide to remain in the vicinity
for the summer. These birds and the Robins and Catbirds
will make themselves useful by feeding on insects at plowing
time.
Birds will drink and bathe even in winter, when they can
find water; but in summer they must have water for both
purposes. When the streams are frozen, snow takes the
place of water; but in summer, if water is not at hand,
birds must get it by drinking dew and by eating fruits or
succulent green vegetation. Where there is running water
about the house or garden, they may do very well without
further provision for their needs; but it is best in any case
to arrange a place where they can drink and bathe without
being exposed to the attacks of cats and Hawks. A shallow
pan set on the window shelf or on the top of a post on the
shady side of the house, some four or five feet from the
ground, will answer every purpose. A shelving stone may
be put in, to give a varying depth of water in different parts
of the pan. The water should not be more than two inches
deep anywhere, and not more than half an inch deep on one
side of the pan. If this is put out in the spring, and the
birds become accustomed to visiting it, they will require less
fruit than usual. The’ water should be changed every day.
This pan will be a source of enjoyment to the household
during the noontime, when all may watch the birds bathe
and splash the water about. Where there is running water
a drinking fountain may easily be arranged. This may be
placed on the lawn, slightly elevated, and supplied from a
drip; such a fountain should need little attention. Orna-
mental fountains and watering troughs are often so deep
that there is no chance for birds to drink or bathe. There
should always be shallow water somewhere. Most orna-
mental ponds have no provision for birds. The water is too
deep or the coping too high. In such cases a large stone
with a surface shelving into and just beneath the water, or
386 USEFUL BIRDS.
a shallow floating basin, provided with a wide wooden rim
to keep it afloat, may be used.
There are usually springs or brooks about the farm, where
birds can drink or bathe; but too often the long grass or
low bushes about these
drinking places conceal
the crafty cat, which lies
in wait to catch birds
when their feathers are
wet from bathing. A
fountain on the closely
cropped lawn, like the
one designed by Mr.
Chapman, is admirable
if cats can be kept from
it.
When the cherry
trees are in blossom
the Hummingbirds
come. There should
be a succession of
nectar-bearing flowers
Fig. 163.—Mr. Chapman’s bird bath. (From in the garden, to at-
tiaentiie tract them. The gla-
diolus, honeysuckle, and bee balm are favorite flowers, but
many others lure the Hummingbirds.
Providing Nesting Places about Buildings.
When the tide of bird life begins to turn northward in the
spring, and before farm work becomes pressing, we should
see that plenty of suitable nesting places are provided about
our buildings for the birds, and that there is an abundant
supply of nesting material with which they can construct
their homes.
Birds, like men, are largely controlled by circumstances.
The presence or absence of a nesting place may decide a pair
of birds for or against the acceptance of a certain locality as
a place of residence.
In the rough buildings of our grandfathers there were
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 387
always openings left for the birds to enter. The rafters
were round or rough-hewn timbers, on which they could
find points of attachment for their nests. Most barns now
built are closely boarded and battened, clapboarded or
shingled to the ground. No entrance hole is left for the
birds. The timbers are sawn so smoothly that the birds,
if they get in, can find no safe attachment for their nests.
Even where the eaves project so as to give sufficient shelter
for Swallows, the mud with which they build their nests
will not stick to the planed and painted boards.
Let every farmer having such a barn cut an ornamental
opening at least a foot wide in each gable, leaving it open
all summer, so that the Swallows may fly in; or; better still,
cut an opening three or four feet long over the barn door,
through which Swallows can go at will. Let him nail rough
cleats horizontally on some of the rafters, or put up little
bracket shelves thereon; and let each farmer having a barn
with wide, projecting eaves put up a long shelf, cleat, or
joist on the side of the barn within a foot of the eaves, for
the Eaves Swallows; and we may in time have more Swal-
lows than ever before, provided care is taken to shoot ma-
rauding English Sparrows. If we had more Swallows and
Phcebes we should have fewer flies, mosquitoes, and garden
pests.
The Chimney Swifts have been driven away by the con-
struction of modern chimneys, and destroyed by unseason-
able storms. They still nest in the large chimneys of the
older houses. A box made of boards planed on the out-
side may be built of the size and shape of an old-fashioned
chimney, with similar divisions, and firmly fastened upon
the roof of a building, to attract the Swifts. It is not nec-
essary that it be high, or even that it be upon the top of a
building ; but it should be out of reach of cats. Possibly a
few thin, wooden cleats nailed horizontally inside will assist
the birds. By means of a door in such a structure, and an
arrangement of mirrors, the habits of these interesting birds
may be studied.
The Pheebe prefers a roof over its head, such as is some-
times furnished by the upturned roots of a large tree, a
388 USEFUL BIRDS.
bridge, barn, shed, or unoccupied house. It will occupy
almost any shed, barn, or barn cellar near a pond or stream,
but its nest is sometimes broken down for lack of a proper
support. A box like that in Fig. 164 will be acceptable to
the Pheebe if nailed up to the plate or rafters of a low shed.
If the shed is closed, an opening
gunk Xe. NSA | should always be left for the birds.
ee > a2 An open window, with a few bars
= across it to keep out cats and human
intruders, is all that is necessary.
Pheebes sometimes build on a shelf
under projecting eaves. They par-
ticularly like a rough stone build-
ing. Robins will often build in rough boxes or trays, or on
shelves put up under eaves or piazzas, in arbors or even in
buildings. ‘
Having provided nesting places for all the birds that may
be induced to nest within our buildings, we may next turn
our attention to making nesting boxes. .
Fig. 164.— Phebe’s nest in box.
Bird Houses and Nesting Boxes.
Since the use of the axe and saw in woodland and orchard
has deprived many birds of their natural nesting places in
hollow trees or limbs, there is no better way of providing for
an increase of the numbers of such birds than by furnishing
them with artificial building sites. Bluebirds found drowned
in cisterns, Owls, Flickers, and Wood Ducks found dead in
the stove pipes of unoccupied buildings, all show the straits
to which birds are now driven in the search for a nesting site.
All apertures that lead to such death-traps should be closed,
and a plentiful supply of artificial breeding places should be
provided.
What more interesting occupation can there be for the
children on the farm than that of preparing nesting boxes
for the birds? This is the surest way of increasing the
summer bird population, for birds do not lack food in sum-
mer so much as safe nesting places in which to rear their
young.
Unfortunately, however, a great obstacle to success with
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 389
native birds is found in all cities and most villages of the
State. The introduced House or “English” Sparrow comes
first, and occupies the boxes. The Sparrow will nest in all
boxes except those that are suspended by a wire or rope.
Bluebirds and Tree Swallows will sometimes occupy such
Sparrow-proof boxes; but the farmer
need not use them, for he can keep
his place clear of Sparrows by a
vigorous use of the shotgun, and
by putting up nesting boxes he may
bring back the native birds. There
are many localities where the Spar-
row has never been very troublesome,
and where native birds have contin-
ued to breed practically unmolested.
In such places we may put up fixed
bird houses, with the confident ex-
pectation that Tree Swallows or
Bluebirds will nest in them, which is
more than can be said of the swinging
boxes. Nevertheless, where Spar-
rows are very troublesome, the only Fig. 165.—Sparrow-proot box,
bird box that is practical is one that imei ila
is hung by wire. Sparrows seem to be afraid of any box or
perch that is not firmly fastened. :
Wrens are not generally common, and the Purple Martins
were so decimated by the storms of June, 1903, that people
who can establish Martin colonies will be fortunate indeed ;
but the Flicker, the Chickadee, and the Screech Owl are
among the possibilities, while we may by chance attract the
White-breasted Nuthatch, Crested Flycatcher, or little Saw-
whet Owl.
Let no one neglect to put up bird houses because of the
expense. No money need be expended. Birds are not very
fastidious about their quarters. Old, weather-beaten lumber
seems to be more attractive to them than that which is newly
planed or painted, probably because it resembles in appear-
ance the weathered stumps or limbs in which they naturally
find their homes. Very acceptable nesting boxes may be
390 USEFUL BIRDS.
made from a hollow limb sawed in sections, with tops and
bottoms made of an old board, and a hole bored in each
section for an entrance.
Artistic imitations of hollow limbs may be made of papier-
maché, but this involves some expense. The best imitations
of a hollow log that I have seen were constructed of the
bark and wood of a sound tree. In Bird-Lore for January—
February, 1905, and in the Youth’s Companion of April 13,
1905, I described the method of making these boxes, but
at that time they were untried. They have since had two
seasons’ trial, with very satisfactory results. To Mr. William
Brewster belongs the credit of their invention, and I have
made a considerable number after his design. White birch
and chestnut were used, as it was believed that the bark of
these trees would be most durable, but Mr. Brewster now
suggests that elm bark is probably best of all. Those por-
tions of the trunks used were from four to eight inches in
diameter. The boxes were made in summer, as the bark
will not usually peel well before about June 20, and then
only for a short time. When the tree had been cut down, the
trunk was sawed into sections from ten to eighteen inches
long, according to the size of the boxes desired. Only straight
sections, free from knots or branches, were used. A branch
of the right size, however, may, when cut off, leave a hole
in the bark that can be utilized as an entrance for the birds.
These domiciles may be made as follows: an incision is
made on the side intended for the back of the box, through
both outer and inner bark, from the top to the bottom of each
section ; then, on the opposite side, some two or three inches
from the top, bore through the bark, with an auger or ex-
tension-bit, a hole of the size desired for the entrance. If
such tools are not at hand, the aperture may be cut with a
gouge, a chisel, or even a knife. Next insert a wedge-shaped
stick into the incision at the back and under the inner bark,
to start it off, and with this implement peel it very carefully.
In peeling birch, be careful not to separate the inner and
outer layers of the bark. Be particularly cautious when
working about knots or rough places. The bark will make
the sides of the box, and two sections, each an inch thick,
as Wat yell th 1,
hid ata Ui
Fig. 8 Fig. 9.
PLATE XLVII.— Bird Houses and Nesting Boxes. Fig. 1, hollow limb nest-
ing box; Fig. 2, birch bark bird house; Fig. 8, slab bird box; Fig. 4, cat-proof
box; Fig.5,a use for an old funnel; Fig. 6, chestnut-bark nesting box; Figs. 7
and 9, boxes with slide fronts; Fig. 8, house for Tree Swallow.
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 391
sawed from the ends of the stick, will make the top and bot-
tom. These must be reduced in size by a shave until the
bark can be lapped fully half an inch at the incision on the
back. Now tack the bark to the bottom and top. Such a
box may be put up by nailing or screwing a short stick or
pole over the Jap on the back, which stick can
in turn be nailed or screwed to the support.
To make the roof watertight, a piece of thin,
green bark from a young pine may be put on
and tacked down over the edges. It will fit
like soft leather, and make a neat appearance ;
but experience has shown that it will not long
resist the effect of sun and rain. A more per-
manent covering may be made by using a piece
- of tin or zinc, as shown in the figure of the
chestnut bark box (Plate XLVI, Fig. 6); or
a roof may be made of birch bark, as shown in
Plate XLVI, Fig. 2. To make the expected 5... eee
nest accessible to examination, the top of the _ barknesting pox,
bark sides might be fastened to a hoop, and Seger
the whole capped by a tin or wooden cover, like that of a
lard pail or a berry box. The best support is a slim pole.
Serviceable dwellings for birds may be made of the shells
of gourds. Seedsmen advertise the seed, and any one can
grow gourds. Squashes, even, may be utilized. The hard-
shelled, old-fashioned winter,crook-neck would make a stout
castle for a Bluebird or a Martin.
Four old shingles and two pieces of old board will make
a box like that shown in Fig. 167. This may be nailed up
in a tall tree near the house, or on a building. It must be
out of reach of cats, or the young are likely to be clawed out
of the hole by these stealthy marauders. To checkmate the
cat, a much deeper box may be made, with a small, high-
placed round hole for the entrance, and a sloping, overhang-
ing roof, which helps to keep out both water and cats. (See
Plate XLVI, Fig. 4.) There is another advantage in a
box of this pattern. The young birds find it rather hard to
get out of such a box at first. They have to make many
attempts, and when they finally escape they are quite strong
392 USEFUL BIRDS.
and less likely to be caught by cats, Crows, or snakes than
they would be if reared in a box from which they could get
out before they were fully fledged.
For practical utility a nesting box should not only provide
the birds with an acceptable nesting site, but it should also
furnish them perfect protection from the elements and their
larger enemies, and should be so made
that the interior can be quickly examined
and the contents removed, if necessary.
The roof or cover should be hinged or
made to take off, so that if any young
bird fails to get out it may be liber-
ated ; while if undesirable tenants, such
as mice, Sparrows, or squirrels, get in,
they may be ousted. The box is much
more satisfactory as a protective device
if made so strong that neither Wood-
peckers nor squirrels can easily enlarge
the entrance sufficiently to allow ene-
mies of the occupants to get in. All
these essentials may be secured without
expense by using worn-out or discarded
utensils or receptacles.
An empty tomato can may in a few
Fig. 167.—Shingle box, minutes be made into a nesting box by
ae eneer slitting the tin of the opened end twice
and turning down the piece between the slits, thereby mak-
ing a hole not over an inch wide and high. It can be put up
very quickly by placing the bottom of the can against a tree
trunk and nailing it there with two wire nails driven diago-
nally through the edge, or by fastening it to a piece of board
or a pole, which can be attached to a tree or building. The
cover may be kept in place by pinching the mouth of the can
a little. The tomato can box is shown in Plate XLVIII.
This is a practical box for Wrens, and it may be used by
Bluebirds if the entrance is made larger.
When holes are cut through tin, the sharp edges round the
opening should be turned over with a pair of pliers, that the
birds may not injure themselves in going in or out. Rusty
PLATE XLVIII.— Inexpensive Nesting Boxes. Tomato can, Bluebird box,
old teakettle, peach can, Owl box, and kerosene can.
sad
e665. Xe 2 ee ae a ee _ ae
as
PLATE XLIX.— Chickadee about to enter its Nest, in an Old Varnish Can.
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 393
or painted tin is best, for birds seem suspicious of bright
surfaces. There should be a few nail holes in the lower side,
to allow the escape of any water that may drive in.
A large funnel may be nailed to a piece of board, and the
board fastened on the side of the barn; or the funnel itself
may be fastened to the building. This may be used by a
Wren or a Chickadee. (See Plate XLVII, Fig.5.) Anold
coffee pot may be set upon a post, or fastened to a bracket
which may be set against the side of a building. Milk cans,
lard pails, flower pots, teakettles, and many other utensils
may be utilized, and fastened up in various ways to trees or
buildings; and, although they may not be ornate, the birds
will find them useful. There should be no projection or limb
immediately beneath a nesting box, to give cat or Crow a
foothold from which to reach into the nest ; but it is always
better to have a small limb or stick, as a perch, within a few
feet, to serve as a rest for the parent birds. Small wooden
boxes, such as may be found at the stores, if not over six by
eight by fifteen inches, may be used. Those who have time
and lumber to spare may make bird houses of any shape to
suit their tastes; but a few suggestions as to construction
and situation will not be out of place.
If one wishes to accommodate only a certain species of
bird, the entrance to the nesting box should be made so small
that no larger bird can enter. Boxes made on this principle
for small birds will protect the eggs and young from Crows
and Jays. A round hole one and one-fourth inches in di-
ameter will do for either Wrens or Chickadees ; but a Wren
can use a smaller opening, just the size of a silver twenty-five-
cent piece, and such a doorway is small enough to keep out
“English” Sparrows. The Chickadee can use a one and one-
eighth inch hole, but some will not be content with one less
than one and one-fourth inches in diameter. Bluebirds and
Tree Swallows can pass through a one and one-half inch aper-
ture. This is usually large enough, and will keep out Jays.
The two-inch hole usually recommended is too large, for it
will admit both Martins and squirrels. These entrances may
be round, square, or oblong. If made oblong, the measure-
ments given should be used horizontally, the vertical diame-
394 USEFUL BIRDS.
ter being made a little larger. The Flicker will sometimes
enter a knothole, only two and one-half inches in diameter,
in an old apple tree; but if so small an opening is made in
a box put up for this bird, it may not use it. For a Flicker
or a Screech Owl the entrance should be made at least three
or three and one-half inches in diameter.
In making boxes of the form illustrated as the cat-proof
box (Plate XLVI, Fig. 4), the following inside dimensions
are sufficient. Boxes for Wrens or Chickadees may be made
twelve by four by five inches, with the entrance hole close
to the top. They may be placed from six to twenty-five
feet from the ground.! A perch is not necessary. Boxes for
Flickers are best if made from hollow limbs or covered with
bark. These birds do not need perches. If limbs with the
bark on are used, they should be cut in late summer, autumn,
or early winter, when the bark will adhere. A box for a
Flicker may be eight by ten by fifteen inches, and should be
placed from six to twenty-five feet up. A similar box twelve
inches square and fifteen high would be ample for a family
of Sereech Owls.2 A box twelve by five by six inches is
ample for Swallows or Bluebirds, and should be placed from
twelve to thirty feet from the ground. Swallows and Blue-
birds like perches. The long diameter of the box should
be from front to back. The sitting bird will then face the
entrance, —a good position for defence. A single tene-
ment will accommodate a family of Martins, but a colony
of these birds should be secured, if possible.
Some writers have recommended putting up boxes with
the entrance facing the east or north. This may be right in
1 The distances from the ground as given here are not arbitrary. I have known
the Chickadee, for instance, to nest at different heights, from two to fifty-five
feet from the ground.
2 This size of box is probably none too large for the Screech Owl, as three or
four young birds soon render the edges of the nest very filthy, and on this ac-
count probably requireextraroom. Nevertheless, a pair of Screech Owls at our
home in Wareham reared a brood of four young in the grocery box shown in the
upper figure on Plate XLVIII. Allowing the birds to be the best judges of what
they want, the dimensions of this box, seven by eleven by fifteen inches, and the
size of the entrance, three by four inches, may be useful to those who wish to at-
tract this bird. It was noted that during the daytime, at least, the mother Ow] in
this box always sat with her head away from the entrance, and in the darkest
corner, —an incubating position sometimes assumed by the day birds that nest
in boxes.
tae
PLATE L.— Owl Box, at Author’s Home. The front has been removed,
and the mother lifted to show the downy young. (Photograph, from
life, by C. Allan Lyford.)
PLATE LI.— Owl on Nest. This view, taken later, shows growth of young,
and also feathers of Blue Jays killed by Owl. (Photograph, from life, by
C. Allan Lyford.) .
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 395
Europe or west of the Rocky Mountains, but it is unsafe
here, where our severest rainstorms come from the north-
east. The entrance should face the south or west, wherever
possible. It is also best to have boxes, especially tin ones,
so situated that they will be shaded by trees or buildings
Fig. 168.—Chickadees feeding their young in an observation box at the author’s
window. (From Reed’s American Ornithology.)
during the hotter part of the day. By these precautions
we may guard against the danger of having the young birds
wet and chilled by cold storms or overheated by the sun.
In very hot weather young birds in unshaded boxes some-
times die from excessive heat.
Those who wish to study the domestic affairs of birds may
construct an observation box with a door on one side, back
of which a pane of glass is set. Such a bird house may be
set up on a window sill, so that by opening the door the feed-
ing and care of the young birds may be watched through the
’
396 USEFUL BIRDS.
glass. I have often thus watched Bluebirds and Chickadees
feeding their young.
Thus far it has been my intention to show how expense may
be avoided in the construction of nesting boxes. Neverthe-
less, expensive ornamental bird houses add to the attractive-
ness of a country home, and may be displayed where old tin
cans and cheap boxes
would be out of place.
In building such bird
houses the best plan is
to imitate the design
of some dwelling. A
pretty cottage ora
country villa may be
constructed in minia-
ture. The large bird
houses sometimes made
are highly ornamental ;
but most of our native
species are not social in
their nesting habits, and
when a large house is put up it is likely to be occupied either
by a single pair of birds or by Purple Martins or House
Sparrows. Such houses are sometimes occupied by both
Martins and Sparrows, but in such cases the Sparrows usu-
ally in the end drive out the Martins. Ifthe Sparrows can be
driven away, there is no bird that can be so readily increased
in numbers by putting up nesting boxes as can the Purple
Martin. When once a colony of Martins becomes estab-
lished, it will in a few years fill several large bird houses
with its increase. The experience of Mr. J. Warren Jaccbs,
who established a large colony, illustrates this.! A few Mar-
tins are returning to some of their old homes in this State ;
they should be encouraged. The houses should be either
taken down in fall and not put up until the Martins return
in spring, or the entrances to the rooms should be closed up
until spring, that the Sparrows may have no opportunity to
get in before the Martins return. Were the Sparrows de-
Fig. 169.— A Martin box.
1 The Story of a Martin Colony, by J. Warren Jacobs, Waynesburg, Pa.
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 397
stroyed and more Martin boxes put up, we might have, in
time, more Martins than ever. A house for a large Martin
colony ordinarily involves the expenditure of a considerable
sum; but a very good house, that will accommodate a colony
of ordinary size, may be made from a flour barrel. The roof
is of zinc,. or of wood covered with painted canvas. The
Martin house should be placed on a pole at least fifteen to
twenty feet high. It should have sev-
eral large rooms, with entrances two to
three inches in diameter, that it may
provide room enough for several pairs
of birds, and that each tenement may be
readily inspected and cleaned when nec-
essary, and the whole house should be
painted in light colors, that: the young
birds may not suffer too much from the
rays of the hot sun. It should be so
constructed that the young birds may
not be readily crowded out of the nest,
and so become the prey of cats. Sucha Fig. 170.—A Martin
catastrophe may be guarded against by pa:
having a shelf or piazza extending round the house beneath
each tier of doorways, and constructing a railing at least
three inches high round the platform. Each of these plat-
forms should have a‘slight downward pitch, to carry off the
rain and prevent it from driving into the doorways below.
There should be no brackets beneath the box, for they afford
the cat a foothold. Many other designs will suggest them-
selves. A barrel might be covered and roofed with bark and
the railings made of twigs. In fitting up the roonis, a square
box should first be made, to go up the center of the barrel.
+ An attempt might be made to establish the Martins by bringing here in the
night from other States bird houses occupied by Martins, young and old, and
setting them up on poles prepared for them in suitable localities here. There is
reason to believe that such introductions would succeed if carefully conducted
when the young had made about half their growth. One successful attempt is
on record. There is a plentiful supply of food here for Swallows and Martins.
The increase of mosquitoes and flies in many localities since the summer of 1903,
when so many of these birds were destroyed, has attracted wide attention. The
reinstatement of the Martins is an important matter, which should engage the
attention of the State Board of Agriculture.
398 USEFUL BIRDS.
All the rooms will be backed by this, and the pole will go
into it. The pole may be made to go into a socket in the
ground, and then both pole and house may be taken down
in the fall and kept under shelter until the Martins return in
the spring; or, if the pole is hinged near the bottom, the
box may be still more readily taken indoors. This will
prevent the Sparrows from intrenching themselves within.
If a cedar pole is used, the bottom should be well tarred
wherever it comes in contact with the ground. It should
be set deep in the ground to give it the requisite firmness.
If the nests of Martins are dusted occasionally with fresh
insect powder, it will relieve them of the vermin which
always congregate in large, occupied bird houses.
Furnishing Nesting Material.
An abundance of suitable and easily accessible nesting
material may chiefly influence some birds in choosing a site
for a home.
It is now believed that the Parula Warbler breeds only
where the usnea moss grows luxuriantly, for in this moss she.
usually secretes her nest, constructing it largely of the same
material. Robins, Swallows, and Phcebes must have mud for
nest building. The Chipping Sparrow lines her nest with
hair, usually that of the horse, cow, or deer. Vireos and
Orioles must have hair or strands of some kind to construct
the pendent fabrics which they skillfully weave. If we hang
nesting materials on bushes, trees, or fences, or place them
on the ground in the open, where birds will be in no danger
from cats while securing them, this may prove to be the final
“straw” which will decide several pairs of birds to nest on
our premises. Such supplies, when watched, furnish ready
means of tracing the nest builders to their nests. We can
then take means to protect the nests from marauders. Root-
lets, fibers of birch, cedar or grape vine bark, straw, fine
hay, hair, feathers, thread, twine, rope yarn, jute, sphag-
num moss, —all will serve a purpose. It is important to
furnish twine, hemp, yarn, or some similar material for the
Orioles; otherwise they may get it by tearing to pieces the
nests of other birds which have used such materials.. In
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 399
dry weather we may provide mud for Robins, Swallows, and
Pheebes to use. At such a time a Robin has been seen to
wet its feathers and then trail them in the dust to make mud
for its nest. Put a pan of mud or clay on the window shelf,
and see if the birds do not find it. All other nesting mate-
rial should be exposed constantly from April to August.
Feeding the Summer Birds.
The food table or window shelf should be supplied with
food all summer. It may help out some bird when in times
of storm or temporary scarcity it can hardly find sufficient
food for its young. We can make feeding experiments with
grains and seeds, nuts and fruits, cooked foods, cereals, bread,
and cake. There should be some food at hand for insect-
‘eating birds and their young, that we may teach them to
trust us. Taming an old bird in summer is usually up-hill
work; but now and then a Catbird or Robin, more confid-
ing than the rest, may learn to come to be fed or even take
food from the hand. Practically all birds will eat hairless
caterpillars, such as the cankerworms; most of them are
fond of grasshoppers and meal worms. We may now and
then find it necessary to feed some young birds, when cold
storms cut short the natural food supply.
Occasionally a young bird jumps or falls from the nest be-
fore it is full-fledged and strong. Such birds are likely to fall
a prey to cats, snakes, or Crows ; but we may be able to save
them by a little care or a few days’ feeding. It will not do
to return the young fledgeling to the nest, as usually it will
not stay there. If the weather is warm and the parents are
at hand, the youngster may now be put in a cage with an oil
cloth cover over its top, and the cage hung on the branch of
a tree near the nest, where the parents sometimes will feed
the fledgeling through the bars. It can be watched a little,
taken in, and kept very warm for a few nights, when it may
be allowed to go with the rest of the brood. If the parent
birds are dead or have deserted the helpless young, it will be
something of a task to supply by hand the wants of the
young birds, as they need feeding often during daylight,
and should be fed about all they will eat. Grasshoppers and
400 USEFUL BIRDS.
hairless caterpillars, with chopped lean meat and a few earth-
worms cut up, will make a good substitute for the natural
food. Those who wish to experiment in this way should
read the chapter on taming and feeding birds in Nature Study
and Life, by Prof. C. F. Hodge. They may thereby avoid
mistakes, save much trouble, and preveut a useless sacrifice
of bird life.
Our experience in attracting Bluebirds, Wrens, and
Chickadees about the house by means of food and nesting
boxes proves conclusively that we may easily domesticate
these birds. Our experiments with the Chickadee will serve
to illustrate how a species may be induced to leave its nest-
ing places in the woods to nest and live about dwellings
and under man’s protection. We first cut down all the de-
caying trees near the house, leaving the birds neither dead
wood in which to make holes, nor natural hollows in which
to find shelter, — but not before we had put up artificial nest-
ing boxes on the house and on the near-by trees. This was
done in the fall, that the birds might become accustomed to
the change before another nesting season, and that they might
find shelter in the boxes during the cold winter nights. It
seems remarkable that Chickadees which naturally breed in
decayed stumps or hollow trees should come to seek the
shelter of old tin cans in winter; but eventually they did so,
going early to these shelters, and nestling together there in
company for mutual protection from the cold.
In the mean time, food was put out near the house win-
dows, where nesting boxes had been ptt up. In the spring
a single pair of Chickadees nested and reared seven young
in a wooden box fastened to a window sill. The next year
two pairs reared young in boxes within two rods of each
other ; one was on the house, the other in an apple tree near
by. The present year (1906) three pairs have reared young,
and two of them have successfully brought off two broods
each. In 1905 a pair accepted a wad of cotton placed in a
box, dug out a hollow in it, and reared young there. This
nesting box is situated upon a window frame three feet from
an outside kitchen door. The illustration (Plate LIII) shows
the bird and her nest.
PLATE LII. — Chickadee’s Nest, made of Cotton, in
Box on Author’s Window.
PLATE LIII.— Chickadee on Nest.
PLATE LIV.— Mother Chickadee bringing Food to Young.
ickadee cleaning Nest.
Mother Ch
PLATE LV
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 401
An incident occurred in connection with this box which
shows how easily birds may be induced to occupy a nest-
ing site, and what influence an ample food supply may have
in deciding them. Two Chickadees came to the box in the
spring of 1906, and went in and out of it for several days,
but finally seemed to be dissatisfied, and went away. A few
days later.a piece of suet was fastened to the window sill.
Within twenty-four hours the birds found it. They visited
it frequently, and at once began carrying nesting material
into the box. A supply of suet was kept there, and two
broods were reared in that box. The old birds fed on the
suet often when hard pressed to fill the nine hungry mouths
in the nest ; but even then the young were fed on insects.
The Chickadees did not utilize a tin can for nesting pur-
poses until 1904, when, during a call on a neighbor, I saw
two Chickadees looking his house over in search of a nest-
ing place. I called his attention to them, and he expressed
a wish for a bird house. I took an old two-quart can from
the dump, made a wooden stopper for it, cut a small hole in
the stopper, and nailed the can up in the nearest tree. The
Chickadees examined it, and within twenty minutes began
building. Here they safely reared a brood. Evidently they
preferred a wooden doorway to their castle, but since then
they have learned to dispense with the wood.
The next summer my neighbor, Mr. Lewis E. Carr, wired
up in a pine near his house an old varnish can that the boys
had somewhat distended during their annual Fourth of July
celebration. The Chickadees took up their: quarters in it
at once, and also nested in it in 1906. This can and its
bird occupant are shown in Plate XLIX. Chickadees now
occupy at least three cans of various sizes and descriptions.
They seem to prefer those that are put up on or near houses.
There is every reason to believe that, were it not for the in-
troduction of the House Sparrow, several useful native birds
might easily be induced to breed about our houses, and even
in the cities, as familiarly as the Sparrow now does.
402 USEFUL BIRDS.
Attracting Water-fowl.
The water-fowl have been hunted until they have become so
wild that attracting them seems at first sight an utterly hope-
less task. Nevertheless, it can be accomplished if only a place
can be found where they may rest and feed unmolested. Wild
Ducks soon learn where they are safe. Along the water front
at Titusville, Fla., no shooting is allowed, but out on the river
gunning is not prohibited. About the wharves and along
the beach at the hotel wild Scaup Ducks swim, dive, and
dress their plumage as unconcernedly as if there were not a
man in sight. They sometimes come ashore and walk about
on the grass near the hotel. They swim at ease among the
small craft at the wharves, and act much like domesticated
Ducks; but when the same birds get out on the river beyond
the dead line, they can hardly be approached within gunshot
by a fast-sailing boat. Wild-fowl, if undisturbed, will settle
in the most unlikely places. A pair of Wood Ducks came
regularly to a small pool in the grove not far from our house,
until disturbed by workmen passing by. Those who have
large estates containing ponds, where Ducks can be protected,
may attract them by scattering grain in the water and on the
shores. This has been successfully tried. A few “ gray call
Ducks” will prove an additional attraction. If the pond or
stream has wooded shores, an attempt should be made to
induce the Wood Ducks to breed. This may be done by put-
ting up nesting boxes. One reason for the present scarcity
of Wood Ducks in this portion of New England is, that sum-
mer camps are now established on many of the ponds where
these birds formerly bred. Another reason is, that there are
few hollow trees in which they can breed. People having
suitably located woodlands should put up nesting boxes made
in imitation of hollow logs, for the Wood Ducks. A box for
these birds should be at least two feet long. It may be
placed either perpendicularly or at an acute angle, and fastened
not far from the ground ona tree near the water. It should
have an opening at least four inches in diameter. Everything
possible should be done to prevent the extermination of this
beautiful bird, and to secure an increase in its numbers.
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 403
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS AGAINST THEIR NATURAL
ENEMIES,
Those who are successful in assembling birds about their
homes are likely soon to find that they have also inadvert-
ently attracted creatures to prey upon them. When our
winter colony of birds was at the height of its numbers, in
January, 1903, it was noticed that the birds were growing
nervous and easily frightened. Soon one was seen to be
minus a tail. Then their numbers began to decrease. An
investigation revealed the cause, — two cats and a Sharp-
shinned Hawk. One day during my absence the Hawk
struck a Blue Jay within twenty feet of the window. If we
expect to conserve our small native land birds and increase
their numbers, something more becomes necessary than
protection from the gunner, the small boy, or the milliner’s
agent; for in woods where all shooting is prohibited the
enemies of birds, particularly Hawks, squirrels, Crows, and
Jays, are likely to increase in numbers, while the smaller
birds decrease. This was the case in the Middlesex Fells
Reservation, soon after the Metropolitan Park Commission
took it. Four years’ experience on my own place in protect-
ing birds from gunners resulted in a very decided increase
in the numbers of squirrels, Crows, and Jays, and a corre-
sponding decrease among the smaller birds. Apparently less
than ten per cent. of the smaller birds raised any young in
1902. During a long stay on the estate of Mr. William
Brewster, at Concord, Mass., in the. breeding season of 1903,
it became evident to me that the numbers of the smaller birds
breeding in his woods had decreased much in the previous
six years. No shooting had been allowed for several years
on this estate of nearly three hundred acres. The owner had
protected the game and birds from destruction by man ; but
the results, so far as some of the smaller wood birds were con-
cerned, were disappointing. The Wood Thrushes nearly all
disappeared. Where there had been five pairs of Redstarts
breeding a few years before, only one pair was seen in 1903,
and they disappeared later. Comparatively few birds were
able to rear their broods that year, except the Robins and
404 USEFUL BIRDS.
other birds that nested near the house, the ground-nesting
birds, and those that bred in nesting boxes or hollow trees.
Crows and Jays were common, though not increasing rapidly,
and both Cooper’s and Sharp-shinned Hawks were present
(probably only one pair of each). Squirrels of three species
were more numerous than I have ever seen them elsewhere.
Since that year the number of birds about the house seems
to have increased. This may be due in part to the fact that
the Cooper’s Hawk no longer breeds on the place ; also, that
the squirrels about the house do not molest the birds much,
while many birds have been attracted by food plants and
nesting boxes.
When it is found, on prohibiting shooting within certain
limits, that the smaller birds are decreasing, we may infer
that they are preyed upon by creatures that were formerly
held in check by gunners. If this be true, then neither the
gunners nor the sportsmen need be looked upon as the un-
mixed evil that some of us have been inclined to consider
them ; and the farmer who has no time to protect birds may
safely allow honorable men to shoot on his land. Evidently
the bird protectionist may be forced to the conclusion that,
in order to protect birds, he must sometimes destroy some
of their natural enemies, even if among these he is obliged
to kill some birds. Hawks, Crows, Jays, and squirrels have
become so accustomed to the persecutions of the gunner
that they are able in a sense to persist in nearly normal
numbers in spite of him; and when we eliminate shooting,
they may increase, to the detriment of the species on which
they prey. In a biographical notice of the late Henry D.
Minot the following appears: “On the home grounds from
seventy-five to a hundred nests were built every spring, and
the broods therein successfully reared, for the birds were
carefully protected. Cats, Hawks, gray squirrels, Crows,
Jays, and snakes were summarily dealt with; every note of
alarm was promptly answered with an efficient rescue, and
all the spring and early summer the air was filled with the
melody of happy birds.” !
1 The Land and Game Birds of New England, by Henry D. Minot. Second
edition, edited by William Brewster.
LHE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 405
What a great number of young birds must have gone out
into the world from that place. The policy pursued by Mr.
Minot may serve as a model for the protection of a colony
of small birds, and, if followed faithfully elsewhere, it ought
to have the same gratifying results. Having undertaken a
portion of the management of creation by introducing and cul-
tivating strange plants and trees, and destroying the larger
wild animals and the Eagles, Hawks, and Owls which for-
merly helped to keep Crows, Jays, snakes, squirrels, and
other predatory creatures in check, we must not now shirk
the responsibility that rests upon us to protect the timid and
defenceless birds which we have left exposed to their increas-
ing enemies. But, if we accept the burden of protecting
birds, we must exercise our power with wise discretion. It
should not be inferred, for instance, if a gray squirrel de-
stroys the young of a pair of Robins, that this is a habit with
all gray squirrels. Those who have large estates, on which
they can protect birds and game, are particularly fortunate
if they have in their employ keepers who can intelligently
discriminate in such matters; otherwise, serious mistakes
may be made. Millais, in his magnificent work on British
surface-feeding Ducks, relates that in 1884 Brown-headed
Gulls began to increase in the bog at Murthly. The keeper
said that the Gulls were killing young Teal. Another ex-
perienced keeper suggested that this was probably the work
of a single Gull. The Gulls were watched, a pair of birds
were seen together, one of which began to kill ducklings.
Both birds were shot, and no more ducklings were killed that
year. In 1890 another pair of Gulls began killing young
Teal; sixteen were found dead. The two culprits were shot,
and no more young Teal were killed that season. Millais
considers that individual Gulls are as dangerous to young
Ducks as any of their numerous enemies ; and yet probably
only two, or at the most four, of the large number at the bog
were actually doing the killing.’ Had not the gamekeeper
been an intelligent observer, a hundred innocent Gulls might
have been shot, and the guilty birds might have escaped to
1 Nevertheless, observers agree that the habits of bird-killing and egg-eating
are quite general among certain species of Gulls.
406 USEFUL BIRDS.
continue their nefarious work elsewhere. Millais confidently
advances the theory that a few individual birds do the mis-
chief for which perhaps the whole race is blamed. He be-
lieves that the individual criminal among birds does his work
stealthily, and so is seldom observed; that his family is fed
on the results of his rapacity ; and that the young acquire
similar tastes and habits, which in time may spread from
family to family and from one community to another. He
states that years ago the Rooks of southern England were
practically innocent of stealing eggs or young birds, though
their cousins in the north were nest-robbers even then. He
says that now there is hardly a community of Rooks in the
south of England that does not contain individuals with the
nest-robbing habit. The view that certain depraved indi-
viduals among birds and mammals are responsible for most
of the unusual depredations on other birds and mammals is
held by many observers. The Marsh Hawk and the Red-
shouldered Hawk are among the most useful of all Hawks ;
but I have known individuals of both these species to be
destructive to birds or young poultry. If such individuals
can be shot, it will be a decided benefit to all concerned.
Where Cooper’s and Sharp- shinned Hawks cannot be shot,
they may be caught by setting steel traps in their nests.
It is quite probable that some Crows do not habitually
steal the eggs and young of other birds. In fall, winter,
and early spring we may welcome Crows about our farm
buildings: They may do much good in the fields in summer,
but, as a measure of safety, they should be kept as far away
from small breeding birds as possible. Poison will kill some
and drive the rest away; but exposing poison in this way is
illegal, and there is great danger of poisoning useful birds.
Egg-eating Crows may be trapped by exposing an egg on
the ground in such a way that the Crow must step into a
concealed trap to get the egg. After two or three have
been caught in this way, the others will avoid the place.
Our laws which deny protection to the Crow are wise, for
it is one of those species which, though at times most useful,
may become a pest if not held severely in check.
Watch the Jays, and shoot every one that is found dis-
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 407
turbing the nests of other birds. The actions of the birds
and their manner toward the Jay are usually sufficient indica-
tion of its character. It is not very difficult to surprise the
Jay in its raids on birds’ nests. It may possibly be neces-
sary now and then to kill a Crow Blackbird that has the
nest-robbing habit.
No native bird should be exterminated, for they all serve
some useful purpose ; but if the introduced House (or “ Eng-
lish” ) Sparrow could be exterminated, one of the chief ob-
stacles to the increase of native birds about villages and cities
would be removed. This is now a hopeless task ; but much
has been effected in some localities by feeding the birds on
poisoned wheat. Such work, however, should never be at-
tempted except by skillful and experienced persons, as other-
wise there is much danger of poisoning poultry, Pigeons, and
native birds. A persistent shooting of the birds, together
with the continual removing of their eggs from all nesting
boxes, will eventually drive them out of a locality.
All who desire to harbor and protect birds must eliminate
the bird-killing cat. The cat is of some service in prevent-
ing the increase of rats and mice in dwellings, as well as that
of other small rodents of the fields and woods; but the ver-
min of the house may be controlled by traps and poison,
while those of the field may be restrained by Hawks and
Owls. A ferret will in a short time drive all the rats from
a building. A smart fox terrier or a good “ratter” will
practically exterminate the rats about a farmhouse. As the
cat is not an absolute necessity, and as it is a potent carrier
of contagious diseases, which it spreads, particularly among
children, it would be far better for the community if most of
the bird-killing cats now roaming at large could be painlessly
disposed of. The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to
Animals has added another to its long list of good works by
chloroforming many thousands of homeless vagrant cats in
the cities. The Animal Rescue League is not far behind in
this good work, which ought to be extended farther into the
country districts. Where the cat is deemed necessary in
farm or village, no family should keep more than one good
mouser, which should never be allowed to have its liberty
408 USEFUL BIRDS.
during the breeding season of the birds, unless it has been
taught not to kill them. Cats can be confined during the
day in outdoor cages, as readily as rabbits, and given the
run of the house at night. Massachusetts law does not
give the cat protection, and all cats found running at large
may be treated as wild animals. All wild or “woods” cats
should be shot at sight. Marauding cats may be trapped
by box traps baited with catnip, and held for the owner, or
killed if no owner appears.
Farmers know well how to deal with foxes, weasels, minks,
skunks, and raccoons. They regard squirrels as pests; but
it.is extremely probable that it is only the individual squir-
rel that robs birds’ nests. Mr. A. C. Dike writes me that
one season when he was carefully watching the birds about
his place he saw the eggs and young in eight birds’ nests
destroyed by the red squirrel; but that in each case the
saine squirrel was the culprit, for he was able to identify it,
because it had lost a part of its tail in escaping from the
cat. Squirrels often nest in hollow trees in which birds have
already established themselves, thus driving out the birds.
It is quite possible that in some localities many of the squir-
rels may have acquired the habit of killing birds. When this
is evident the squirrels should be killed. Unfortunately, the
law protects gray squirrels at the only time when this habit
can be observed. Where birds show no alarm when squir-
rels approach their nests, the presumption is that the squir-
rels are innocent. The beauty and grace exhibited in the
forms and motions of squirrels have made them favorites
with many people, who will not wish to kill them. Others
will wish to avoid killing Crows, Jays, Hawks, or even cats.
But all should regard it a duty to protect the nests of birds
from these marauders. Some experiments in this direction
have been made. It is a simple matter, as has been described,
to protect such birds as will build in nesting boxes ; but those
that nest on the ground are peculiarly liable to the attacks
of their enemies, and other means of protecting them may
possibly be devised.
Years ago I secured a translation of a paper published in
France by Xavier Raspail, entitled “The Protection of Use-
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 409
ful Birds,” in which he gives a method of protecting their
nests from their enemies. Of sixty-seven nests observed
from April to August, only twenty-six prospered. Of the
forty-one destroyed, fifteen were known to have been robbed
by cats, eight by the garden dormouse, three by Jays, and
two by Magpies. He protected twenty nests either by fur-
nishing the birds vermin-proof bird boxes to build in, or
by surrounding the nests with wire netting. Only two of
these were robbed of eggs or young, and they were pillaged
by animals that got through or under the netting. These
simple methods of protection assured the rearing of one hun-
dred and two young birds from nineteen nests. Comparing
these figures with those from the unprotected nests, we find
that, proportionately, only seven pairs of parents out of the
twenty would have succeeded in rearing their young had
their homes been unprotected. The paper lacks a complete
description of the method of putting up the wire nest pro-
tectors. There is nothing to show whether the enclosure was
without a cover, or whether an opening was left in the top
just large enough to admit the parent birds; but the mesh
used was, in some cases at least, small enough to keep out
mice, or about one-fifth to one-sixth of an inch in diameter.
The language used seems to indicate that the nests on the
ground were merely enclosed by a circular fence of wire
netting. Mons. Raspail says that nests so protected are not
attacked by weasels or mice. There seems to be nothing
to prevent these animals from climbing over the wire, except
that they may stupidly strive to get at the nest from below,
and so walk around the cage without seeking an entrance
above. The sly fox, perceiving the smell of iron, might sus-
pect a trap. Probably Crows and Jays, being also suspicious
of a trap, would not enter these enclosures. The surround-
ing of the nests with netting in no case caused the birds to
desert their home, even when it was done as soon as the nest
was completed and before the eggs were laid. This method
might be worth a trial.
Where nesting trees are isolated, cats and squirrels may
be kept out of them by the use of either of the devices shown
in the cut (Fig. 171), for these animals cannot climb up a per-
410 USEFUL BIRDS.
fectly smooth surface. Nesting boxes mounted on poles may
be guarded in this way. Zinc is the best material. A wide
piece of wire netting, shaped like a hat brim, and fastened
around a tree, will prevent cats and squirrels from climb-
ing it. A smooth,
tall, slim pole, made
of a peeled sapling
pine set in the open,
is rarely climbed by
cats or squirrels.
Thick thorn bushes
often serve as safe
nesting places for
birds. Bundles of
thorny sticks tied
around tree trunks
will keep cats out of
the trees. An island
in a small artificial
Fig. 171.— Zinc bands to prevent cats or squirrels pond is also a refuge
from climbing trees or poles.
from cats. The best
cat-proof fence for a city garden is that used by Mr. William
Brewster at Cambridge. It is made of wire netting some
six feet in height, surmounted by a fish seine of heavy twine,
which is fastened to the top of the wire. The top of the net is
then looped to the ends of long, flexible garden stakes. This
fabric gives beneath any weight, and offers so unstable a foot-
ing that no cat ever succeeds in scaling it. Mr. Brewster's
garden has become famous for the numbers of birds that breed
there, and the migrants that visit it year by year.
THE PROTECTION OF FARM PRODUCTS FROM BIRDS.
Serious losses sometimes occur from injury inflicted on
crops or poultry by birds. It is well to remember, how-
ever, that, while the harm done by birds is conspicuous,
the compensating good that they do is usually unnoticed.
In most cases it is best not to kill them, but to protect both
birds and crops; for by killing too many birds we may dis-
turb the biological equilibrium, and bring about a greater
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 411
injury than the one we attempt to prevent. The destruction
of too many corn-pulling Crows, for example, might be fol-
lowed by such an increase of grubs and mest ipoaks that no
grass could be grown; or the extermination of Hawks and
Owls might be succeeded by the destruction of all the young
fruit trees by hordes of mice. Moreover, other evils, far less
simple and easily traceable, might result, for the widening
ripples that man creates by disturbing the balance of nature
are likely to be felt in the most tnexpected places.
Most birds earn more of our bounty than they receive,
and that portion of our products which they ordinarily eat
may be justly looked upon as but partial payment for their
services. Nevertheless, the farmer. must protect his prop-
erty from excessive injury, such as sometimes occurs when
the natural food supply of birds is cut short, or when too
many are gathered upon a small area.
To protect Grain from Crows and Other Birds.
The following spring measures are recommended : —
1. Tar the seed corn, as follows: “Put one-fourth to one-
half bushel of corn in a half-barrel tub; pour on a pailful of
hot water, or as much as is necessary to well cover the corn ;
dip a stick in gas tar, and stir this briskly.in the corn; re-
peat until the corn is entirely black ; pour off onto burlap
(bran sacks are excellent) ; spread in the sun and stir two
or three times during the day. If this work is done in the
morning, and the day is sunny, the corn will be ready for
the planter the next day without any other care. The hot
water softens the tar so that just enough will adhere to the
corn, and the corn is completely glazed by the sun. This
is by far the quicker way of tarring corn, is harmless and
effectual, and I have for years planted with a machine corn
treated in this way.”?
2. Scatter soaked corn often about the borders of the field.
3. Plant the seed three or four inches deep. This is said
to prevent corn-pulling by Crows, and must be effectual on
heavy soil. ‘
1 Ethan Brooks, in Annual Report of the Massachusetts State Board of Agri-
culture, 1896, p. 294.
412 USEFUL BIRDS.
4, Surround the field with a line of twine, strung on
upright poles, and suspend rags, streamers, pieces of bright
tin, etc., from the twine.
5. A frequent change in scarecrows is advisable. A
barrel hung on a leaning pole puzzles the Crow.
To drive Blackbirds from a cornfield in autumn, a charge
of fine shot fired from a long distance, so as to rattle among
them, will be effectual without injuring them.
To protect grain from the House (or “ English”) Sparrow
a liberal use of the shotgun is usually successful. Poisoned
wheat has been used in extreme cases.
To protect Small Fruits.
It is not usually good biology to shoot birds for eating
fruit. It is better to provide fruit enough for both birds
and man, especially wild fruit, which birds prefer. The fol-
lowing protective measures are recommended : —
1. To protect strawberries and cherries (May and June),
plant Russian mulberry and June berry or shadberry, or plant
several trees of the soft early cherries, to furnish food for
the birds. The Governor Wood is a type of the kind they
prefer. (G. T. Powell.)
2. To protect. raspberries and blackberries (July and
August), plant mulberry, buckthorn, elder, and chokeberry.
(Florence Merriam [Bailey].) Also, plant some early sweet
berries, and let the fruit remain until dead ripe, to attract
the birds from the others. Strawberries may be thus pro-
tected. (Prof. H. A. Surface.) The larger fruits, such as
apples, pears, and peaches, are not much injured by birds in
Massachusetts.
3. Where it is found impossible to protect small early
cherry trees in any other way, it will pay to cover them
with fine fish net while the fruit is ripening.
4. If Kingbirds nest near cherry trees, they will keep
other birds away. Bees, particularly drones, attract King-
birds,
° To protect Poultry from Hawks and Crows.
1. Rear the young chicks or ducklings on grassland, in
portable brooders or coops to which movable runs are
attached. Poultry reared in this way is much finer for the
THLE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 413
table than if allowed to run. The stock intended for laying
may be given free range when four months of age, or when
too large to be attacked by Crows or most Hawks.
2, Kingbirds, Martins, or our largest Hawk, the Osprey
or Fish Hawk (Pandion haliaétus carolinensis), if allowed
to nest near the coops, will protect all poultry from Hawks.
All these birds are confiding wherever they are unmolested.
Where the Osprey is protected it will build its nest in a tree
near the farmyard. It never troubles poultry or small birds,
and should be protected by law at all times.
3. Hawks may be frightened away from the poultry yard
if a general shout is raised whenever one appears.
4, When a Hawk has flown off with a chicken it should
be followed quickly but cautiously, and may be shot while
absorbed in eating its prey.
GENERAL PROTECTIVE MEASURES.
The first and most important step in protecting birds
from their human enemies is to create a public sentiment
in favor of birds, by teaching their value and the necessity
for conserving them. This is a legitimate work for State
boards of agriculture and State boards of education. Free
lectures on this subject, illustrated by stereopticon, should
be given at teachers’ institutes and State normal schools,
at gatherings of school children held for the purpose, at
farmers’ institutes, and before farmers’ clubs and grange
meetings. Some work of this nature has been done by the
Massachusetts State Board of Education and by the orni-
thologist of the State Board of Agriculture, but much more
should be done.
There are ample reasons for introducing economic nature
study in the schools. The utility of birds and the means of
attracting and protecting them should be taught in home
and school as the most important bird study. A feeding
shelf for birds should be put up at a window of every coun-
try school-house, or upon the flag pole. Children should be
induced to plant trees, vines, and shrubs that furnish food
for birds. The making of nesting boxes should be taught
in the schools. This is a good subject for manual training
classes. The boy who learns to feed birds and to furnish
414 USEFUL BIRDS.
them with houses will always be their friend. Boys should
be taught to exchange the gun for the camera, the sketch
book, or the note book. Children should be cautioned not
to disturb the nests of birds during the breeding season ; but
the nest census, taken after the leaves have fallen, is instruct-
ive and harmless.
An educational propaganda should be carried on in those
States in which the birds that breed in Massachusetts or
pass through it are killed in their migrations. Every State
should have an official economic ornithologist, among whose
duties should be investigation of the relations of birds to
insect and other pests, and the production of popular leaflets
and newspaper articles on birds and their conservation.
When public sentiment in favor of bird protection is thor-
oughly aroused, then, and not till then, will effective laws
be enacted, respected, and enforced.
Game Protection,
The conservation of fish and game is a vital preliminary
step in bird protection.
It is plain that, having necessarily destroyed the larger
predatory animals, man must hold in check the creatures
on which they formerly fed. This is the task of the angler
and the sportsman, and it is a legitimate one, in so far as
it disposes of only the surplus fish, mammals, and birds ;
but the tendency to go farther than this must be sharply
curbed, for wherever the larger game mammals and game
birds are exterminated, people begin to shoot the smaller
species. So long as the supply of game is kept up, just so
long are the song birds comparatively safe.
A mere glance at the history of game legislation in
Massachusetts or any other eastern State is enough to make
one wonder that any native game now exists. From the
settlement of Massachusetts until the year 1817 there was
practically no limit to the amount of bird shooting that any
one might legally do at any season of the year. Until
that year the only legislation enacted regarding birds pro-
vided bounties for their destruction. Among other species,
the Ruffed Grouse or Partridge was the victim of local
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 415
bounty laws. By 1817 most of the larger game mammals
and game birds were nearing extermination, and people
were beginning to shoot Robins, Larks, Snipe, and Wood-
cock, in place of larger birds. A law was then passed pro-
tecting these birds from March 1 to July 4, and Partridges
and Quail were protected from March 1 to September 1;
but this law was nullified locally by town option, for any
town meeting could annually suspend its operation.
«» The most stringent game legislation of the middle nine-
teenth century period was a series of acts, not for the
protection of the birds, but for the benefit of people en-
gaged in netting Wild Pigeons. The penalties for disturb-
ing Pigeons about net beds were heavier than those for
merely killing game out of season. They even included a
term in jail.
It would be ludicrous, were it not pathetic, that we with-
hold adequate statutory protection from game birds until
they are practically exterminated. Protective statutes come
too late. It is only within recent years, when the Passenger
Pigeon and Heath Hen have become nearly extinct, that
statutes protecting them at all times have been enacted and
retained on the statute books. We have only just succeeded
(1906) in getting enactments protecting the Wood Duck
and the Bartramian Sandpiper or Upland Plover at all sea-
sons. Unless stringent laws can be passed and enforced in
other States, as well as in Massachusetts, the extinction of
these birds is even now imminent.
The game laws of Massachusetts for 1906 protect all “song
and insectivorous birds,” Doves, Pigeons, Heath Hens, Pin-
nated Grouse, Pheasants, Bartramian Sandpiper or Upland
Plover, Herons, Bitterns, Wood Duck, and most Gulls and
Terns throughout the year. Other game birds and wild-
fowl are protected, but inadequately. Eventually the shoot-
ing season must be shortened.
Measures and Legislation necessary for the Protection of Game and
Birds.
To provide against the extermination of game, there must
be established throughout the country a series of State res-
ervations, maintained as places of refuge for game, where
416 USEFUL BIRDS.
it can be absolutely protected at all seasons. Large for-
est reservations have already been acquired by the United
States government and by several States. In January,
1906, New York had reserved nearly a million and a half
acres, and Pennsylvania had purchased, or contracted for,
seven hundred and fifty thousand acres. Connecticut, New
Jersey, and other States have adopted reservation policies;
and, as Alfred Akerman, late State Forester of Massachu-
setts, well says, this Commonwealth ought to extend its”
policy of park reservation to include genuine State forests.
There are about three million acres in Massachusetts that
are of little value except for forestry. Under rational forest
management we might, in time, grow most of the lumber
used here, instead of buying it in the north, west, and south.
This land is the natural stronghold of the Ruffed Grouse,
the red deer, and many other game mammals and birds. A
goodly portion of it should be devoted to the preservation
of the forests and the game.'
Some of the great ponds of the State should be set off
as reservations for water-fowl; marshes and sandy shores
should be taken as refuges for sea fowl and shore birds;
and islands should be reserved as breeding places for sea
birds. Undoubtedly the profits from the forest reserves
would, in time, pay the cost of maintaining the entire system.
Prussia owns six million acres of forest land, from which
the government derives a net annual revenue of $9,000,000 ;
and France receives a net yearly income of $1.91 per acre
from its large government forest.
While this policy is being inaugurated, other legislation
is imperative. Laws must be enacted, whenever it becomes
necessary, protecting certain birds at all times for a series
of years, and those laws must be enforced with a strong hand.
Spring shooting destroys the naturally selected breeding stock
which has survived the dangers of fall and winter; it should
be absolutely prohibited. More and more stringent regula-
1 A large part of the forested land of the State will probably always remain
in the hands of private owners or corporations. Farmers on adjoining farms may
band together, and, by posting notices on their lands, they may protect the game of
considerable tracts. Farmers in some towns are now trying this plan. Wealthy
owners of large tracts have a still better opportunity to work for the public good.
PLATE LVI.— Domesticated Canada Goose ori Nest. - (Photograph, from
life, by I. Chester Horton.)
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 417
tions will become necessary regarding the marketing and ship-
ment of game. The hunting license, which is now finding
favor in many States, must sooner or later be adopted here.
It is doubtful, however, if all these measures will result in
replenishing our woods with game in its former abundance.
The restocking of covers with birds from other States —
an excellent method, which has long been practised by game
protective associations —is likely to come to an end, for
already most States do not allow shipments of birds to points
outside the State boundaries.
Artificial Propagation of Game Birds.
The greatly increased demand for game birds must be met
by a new source of supply. The only promising method
available for restocking is artificial propagation and feeding.
Pheasants, Quail, Wood Ducks, Mallards, Teal, and other
wild-fowl may be reared in great numbers if the work is
scientifically done. It was interesting to observe the large
number of Pheasants and Mallards successfully reared in
1905 by Mr. Bayard Thayer at Lancaster. This is the work
in which commissioners on fisheries and game, game pro-
tective associations, and wealthy land owners must engage
if we are to have game in its former abundance. A begin-
ning may be made by importing experienced gamekeepers
from England and Scotland, where, notwithstanding the
long settlement of the country and the density of the popu-
lation, people have game for their own use, and export a
great deal to this country to supply our depleted markets.
Artificial propagation is the most important work of the
century concerning game birds. Many thousands must be
reared and liberated annually in every Atlantic coast State,
until the covers are well stocked and the marshes again
swarm with game birds and wild-fowl.
Attempts should be made to domesticate game birds. In
more than three centuries since the discovery of the Ameri-
can continent only one American bird, the Turkey, has
become widely distributed through domestication. There
is no doubt that Quail, Grouse, and Wood Ducks may be
readily tamed, and the Canada Goose has been long known
418 USEFUL BIRDS.
to be capable of domestication. More attention to this sub-
ject might add largely to the quantity of our food supply,
and provide a source from which the stock of game could be
replenished. The restocking of the State with a plentiful
supply of game would keep within her borders a part at
least of the more than two million dollars which is annually
spent in other States by her sportsmen, and it would pro-
vide recreation at home for those who cannot afford the
expense of travel.
THE MOVEMENT FOR BIRD PROTECTION.
In setting forth the measures necessary for the protection
of birds, one cannot ignore the fact that a great movement for
bird protection is under way and has already accomplished
great good. The Audubon societies of the country have so
influenced public sentiment as to practically stop the wear-
ing of the feathers of useful American birds. The American
Ornithologists Union was enabled, through moneys raised by
the efforts of Mr. Abbott H. Thayer, to protect the sea birds
on many islands along the coast of the United States for
several years.!_ This work and the general one of protecting
native birds and other animals have been taken up by the
National Association of Audubon Societies, under the leader-
ship of Mr. William Dutcher of New York. The untiring
devotion of his time and means to this cause is bringing forth
fruits in the shape of improved legislation and aroused public
sentiment in many States. Through his earnest efforts this
movement is receiving deserved endowment, which will un-
doubtedly result in its perpetuation. Gaime protection has
been taken up by the Biological Survey of the United States
Department of Agriculture, and a very efficient officer, Dr.
T. S. Palmer, has been placed in charge of the enforcement
of the Lacey act. State governments have been assisted by
the strong hand of the United States in enforcing advanced
legislation. The central government has co-operated with
the Audubon societies and game protective associations of
1 The Massachusetts colony of Terns and Gulls at Muskeget Island was saved
from extermination first through the efforts of Mr. William Brewster and others
and later by the continuous work of Mr. George H. Mackay.
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 419
different States. This co-operation has resulted in a great
general improvement in State laws and their enforcement.
This movement, now so well under way, gives promise of
preserving a large part at least of the wealth of our fauna,
which we may be said to hold as trustees for posterity.
For the benefit of those persons who are interested in
caring for and protecting birds, a list of some officials and
associations who will help to further the work is appended : —
Bureau of Biological Survey, United States Department
of Agriculture, Washington, D. C., Dr. C. Hart Merriam,
chief, Henry W. Henshaw, administrative assistant. The
Survey distributes a large number of authoritative publi-
cations on the food habits and utility of birds. Dr. T. S.
Palmer of the Survey, assistant in charge of game preserva-
tion, has literature on that subject for distribution, and is
prepared to furnish information that will aid in the enforce-
ment of the game and bird laws.
The National Association of Audubon Societies (offices,
141 Broadway, New York), William Dutcher, president,
T. Gilbert Pearson, secretary, is helping the cause of bird
protection everywhere by every means in its power. It
sends out excellent illustrated leaflets to teachers, and
directly influences legislation.
The Massachusetts Commission on Fisheries and Game
(Room 158, State House, Boston), Dr. George W. Field,
chairman, is the legally constituted authority for the enforce-
ment of the fish, game, and bird laws of Massachusetts. The
commission furnishes, on request, a poster containing an
abstract of these statutes. A copy of this is posted annually
in each post-office in the State. The officers of the com-
mission attend to all complaints of infractions of these laws.
The commission is also engaged in propagating Pheasants,
Quail, and Grouse.
The State Board of Agriculture (room 136, State House,
Boston), J. Lewis Ellsworth, secretary, distributes bulle-
tins, reports, and nature leaflets on birds and bird protection ;
also cloth posters, on which are printed extracts from the
trespass laws.
The Massachusetts Fish and Game Protective Association
420 USEFUL BIRDS.
(216 Washington Street, Boston), William Brewster, presi-
dent, Henry H. Kimball, secretary-treasurer, is the most
influential and effective game protective organization now
actively at work in the State. It furnishes game birds to
restock depleted covers, grain for game birds in winter, and
posters containing abstracts of the game laws. Its officers
also assist in the enforcement of the statutes. Practically
all the game protective associations of Massachusetts are
affiliated with this organization.
The Massachusetts Audubon Society (234 Berkeley Street,
Boston), William Brewster, president, Miss Jessie E. Kim-
ball, secretary, is one of the most powerful forces for bird
protection in the State. Its local secretaries are numerous,
and its influence is widely felt. This association takes no
direct action to enforce the law; its chief function is to
influence public sentiment, and secure protective legislation.
The secretary has literature for distribution, and the associa-
tion publishes charts and provides lectures on birds.
The Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty
to Animals (19 Milk Street, Boston), George T. Angell,
president, Hon. Henry B. Hill, vice-president, furnishes
cards for posting in public places, offering rewards for the
conviction of persons killing birds or taking their nests or
eggs. This society, whose good work is well known, also
furnishes free literature advocating kindness to birds and
other animals.
There are other associations that take an interest in the
protection of birds. The Animal Rescue League, the League
of American Sportsmen, the Agassiz Association, and many
minor societies and sportsmen’s organizations, lend their in-
fluence to strengthen this movement. Sportsmen’s periodi-
cals have done much for the protection of birds and game.
The Forest and Stream Company of New York, under the
direction of Mr. J. Bird Grinnel, supported the first Audu-
bon Society for years, both editorially and financially.
Writers like Herbert K. Job, Ernest Harold Baynes, and
A. C. Dike are penning helpful articles for newspapers
or periodicals. Nature books are teaching altruistic ideas
regarding birds.
THE PROTECTION OF BIRDS. 421
All these agencies must help to hasten the day when our
woods shall teem with game and birds; when our lakes and
rivers shall be populous with wild-fowl; and when our
people, young and old, shall welcome, protect, and cherish
our feathered friends of orchard, garden, and field. If this
volume shall help in any degree to bring about this con-
summation, it will not have been written in vain.
Papers ON ORNITHOLOGY, PUBLISHED BY THE MASSACHUSETTS STATE
BoarpD OF AGRICULTURE.
Essays and Lectures.
Utility of Birds. Wilson Flagg. Annual report of the Massachusetts
State Board of Agriculture, 1861 (Part II.), pp. 50-78.
Agricultural Value of Birds. E. A. Samuels. Jbid., 1865 (Part I.),
pp. 94-117.
The Utility of Birds to Agriculture. Frank H. Palmer. Jbid., 1871
(Part II.), pp. 107-120.
Insect-eating Birds. Frank H. Palmer. Jbdid., 1872 (Part II.),
pp. 194-210.
Birds of Massachusetts. Dr. B. H. Warren. Jbid., 1890, pp. 34-57.
The Regulative Influence exerted by Birds on the Increase of Insect
Pests. E.H. Forbush. Massachusetts Crop Report, September,
1894.
Birds as Protectors of Orchards. E. H. Forbush. Annual report of
the Massachusetts State Board of Agriculture, 1895, pp. 347-362.
The Crow in Massachusetts. E. H. Forbush. Jbid., 1896, pp. 275-
296.
Nature’s Foresters. KE. H. Forbush. Jd7d., 1898, pp. 279-294.
Birds as Destroyers of Hairy Caterpillars. KE. H. Forbush. J0id.,
1899, pp. 316-337.
Birds Useful to Agriculture. E.H. Forbush. Jbid., 1900, pp. 36-61.
Birds as Protectors of Woodlands. E. H. Forbush. Jd7d., 1900,
pp. 800-321.
Two Years with the Birds on a Farm. E.H. Forbush. for@., 1902,
pp. 111-161.
Special Reports.
Ornithology of Massachusetts, List of Species. E.A. Samuels. Annual
report of the Massachusetts State Board of Agriculture, 1863
(Part I.), Appendix, pp. xviii—xxix.
Report on the Birds of Massachusetts, by the State Board of Agricul-
ture to the House of Representatives, under the resolution of May
28, 1890. Ibid., 1890, pp. 267-273. .
422 USEFUL BIRDS.
The Destruction of Birds by the Elements in 1903-04. E. H. Forbush.
Ibid., 1903, pp. 457-503.
The Decrease of Certain Birds, and its Causes, with Suggestions for
Bird Protection. E.H. Forbush. Jdid., 1904, pp. 429-548.
Nature Leaflets.
No. 12. Winter Birds at the Farm. E.H. Forbush. 1902.
No. 14. Owl Friends. E. H. Forbush. 1903.
No. 15. Bird Houses. E.H. Forbush. 1903.
No. 16. Our Friend the Chickadee. E.H. Forbush. 1903.
No. 22. Hints for Out-door Bird Study. E.H. Forbush. I. How to
identify Birds. 1904.
No. 23. Ilid. II. How to find Birds. 1904.
No. 24. Jbid. III. How to approach Birds. 1904.
No. 25. Ibid. IV. How to attract Birds. 1904.
INDEX.
INDEX.
{Heavy-faced type indicates the principal reference to a species. In most instances a
brief description of the bird referred to may be found on the page thus indicated. ]
PAGE
Accipiter atricapillus, . : F < 5 : 5 : , : . 366
cooperii, . * ; ‘ . , . P j ¥ ; . 366
velox, . , * P ¥ x Pi ‘ ¥ F r . 366
Actias luna, . ‘ ‘i ds . i ‘ . " . , . 108
Agelaius aaa ‘ : je ‘ ‘ 4 é é ‘ » 319
Aix sponsa, . . r F ‘ ri a i ‘ . . 353
Akerman, Alfred, ‘ . ‘ & . ‘ : Z r : . 416
Alabama ar; gillaeea, r . 7 : : : . . . » 33
Allen, J. A., . . § é‘ i ‘i ‘ . . “ ° * . 302
Altum, Bernhard, . ; F 7 7 ‘ é a a 5 . 64
Anabrus purpurascens, . é ‘ F ‘ F ‘ @ a ql 66
Anas obscura, . : ‘ ‘ . “ 7 . . A ‘ ‘ 353
Angell, George T., . 0 : 5 j ‘i ‘ ‘ ‘ . 420
Anthonomus grandis, . ‘ . : ‘ . . ri a fi . 234
Antrostomus vociferus, . : % i 3 r P ‘ ‘ x . 342
Aphid, birch, eggs of, . é 4 ‘ . . ‘ : . 223
Aphis, hop vine, . % ‘ “ ‘ é , ‘ ¥ « 29
woolly apple, & 5 - ‘i ‘ i é F i . 208, 252
Aphodius inquinatus, . é : é : ¢ Z : Z Fi - 61
Ardea herodius, fs ‘ , ‘ : ‘ 7 7 . 852
Army worm, . . 3 ; 5 : : . 36, 218, 295, 316, 323, 330, 349
Asio accipitrinus, . F . F 5 ‘ ‘ ‘ 5 < . 367
wilsonianus, . ; é ‘ ‘ ‘ 7 , 3 . 368
Audubon, John J.,. ‘ 6 3 ‘ 3 a ‘ 3 194, 263, 346, 347
Aughey, Samuel, . ‘ . F ‘ a P Z i 54, 184, 200, 335
Auk, Great, . F F i : ‘ ‘ Fi i é 5 3, 354, 356
Bailey, Charles E.,. . 124, 142, 166, 169, 170, 175, 178, 214, 240, 241, 253, 256
S. Waldo, . A F . a q ‘ . . és . 370
Baird, Spencer F., . é ‘ é a « F ‘ a ‘ é . BB
Ballou, H. A., . * . A : r ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ . » 45
Bangs, Outten, . ‘i ri : ‘1 ; 7 2 . . . 238
Bark louse, oystersel. 5 ‘ ‘ ‘i : ‘ , ~ «168, 175
Barton, B. S., . - ‘i 7 ‘i k ‘ f 4 ‘ . . 54
Baskett, J. M., . . F : ‘ : y c z ‘ 3 . 259
Baynes, Ernest Harold, . . . 420
Beal, F. E. L., + 88, 59, 61, 162, 211, 226, “g07, 234, 236, 239, 259, 264, 283, 285,
293, 305, 318, 321, 342
Beetles, Colorado potato, ¥ P F * . 16, 27, 29, 216, 218, 330, 342
elm-leaf, . : 4 ‘i - * « 207, 211, 234
May, . is ‘ 7 a ‘6 § 10, 11, ‘183, 220, 227, 234, 238, 348
rose, . ‘ * P * ‘ 2 ‘ ‘ . 160, 348
striped cucumber, . 7 ‘ i ; » 227, 234, 342, 348
Bendire, Charles, . i x . ‘ r . i Fe ‘ » 232, 255
426 INDEX.
Bibio albipennis, . : * ; ; . x 7 * * ; . 286
Bird, Myrtle, . 3 P P ¥i a 4 é ‘ i ‘ . « 201
Planting, : ‘ r : . . 7 : . . . - 179
Teacher, H ‘i ‘ . . ‘ d . 7 . a . 188
Birds as tree planters, . . : c . . : fi F . . 98
pruners, . ‘ 7 : Fi E é i . ‘ » 99
flight of, ‘ ‘ é Z ‘ ‘ 2 ‘ ¥ , « 2
Bittern, American, ‘ < < : é : i . a i . 352
Least, a i pi , ‘ 5 . ‘ ‘i A . . 352
Blackbird, Cow, . é i ‘ ‘ ‘ F , i . 320
Crow, . : F ‘ ‘ j 7 114, 130, 135, 313, 371
food of, ‘ 5 F r i . é . 815
Marsh, . R ‘ ‘ ‘ a * . 319
Red-winged, : 3 F . 60, ‘14, 122, 125, 198, 180, 131, 319
food of, . . . 7 . 820
Rusty, . . . . F a e 5 a ; - 122, 312
Skunk, . qi 5 a ‘ 4 a 3 é : * « 322
Western Crow, . ‘ ‘ ‘ 5 “ i : ‘ . 313
Yellow-headed, . ‘ ‘ r c c 0 a ‘ . 67
Blackbirds, . i i A F : : . ‘ i - 2, 69, 75, 76
Blissus leucopterus, Z ‘ ‘ é : . . : ‘ . 83
Bluebird, ‘ . . ‘ : . ‘i 6 . 115, 290, 389
food of, . F 7 A : 4 ; . ji is . 291
Bobolink, . , ‘ ‘ s é i ‘ . : ‘ 125, 127, 322
food of, . 4 : ‘ ‘ . . . . i ‘ « 323
Bob-white, ‘ * ‘ Fi : : 5 e i 7 . + 60, 325
food of, . i i S fs ‘ ‘ ‘i F éj _ . 831
Bombyx dispar, % i 7 7 : ‘ ‘ F ‘ . . 64
Borer, bronze birch, . : i fi Fi a‘ ‘ * ‘i F . 254
maple, . ri F ei Fi 4 a F . : . f . 254
Brewer, Thomas M., ‘ i . 847
Brewster, William, 13, 218, 243, 267, 269, 331, '338, 390, 404, 410, 418, 420
estate of, C : . P * + 403
Bruchus hibisci, . : ‘ F ‘ . ‘ i ‘ x x a 178
Bruner, Lawrence, . z i j : . * . * ‘ z - 109
Bubo virginianus, . 4 ‘ x é x ‘ é i ® ‘ . 367
Bucculatrix pomifoliella, ‘ ‘ * F ‘ * : ‘ ¥ » 252
Buckham, James, . ; ‘ . é ws ‘ i F a 7 . 343
Bull bat, é F : . a ‘ ‘ . ¥ 4 ‘ . 341
Bunting, Bapaiieed; . . . . . . a ‘ F F . 311
Black-throated, ; ‘ é r é P ‘ r ‘ . O06
Cow, ‘ j F ‘ r ‘ Ps ‘ P . . 320
Indigo, . ‘ A Fi r a ‘ , . 115, 122, 298
Burroughs, John, . . H é ‘ é 189, ‘190, 199, 226, 312, 363, 371
Butterfly, mourning-cloak, . : : r é 3 ‘ ‘ 16
caterpillar of, 6 ‘ . *% 2 é « (227
parsley, eggs of, . ‘ ‘ i ‘ ‘ 4 ‘ P - 305
Cabbage worms, . ‘ - ‘ ‘ . : ‘ ‘ : : . 3802
Canary, Wild, ‘ : Pi e F é F ‘ . ‘ . 194, 222
Cankerworm, fall, . : 7 : i i 2 ‘ . 5 . . 169
spring, + 70, 170
Cankerworms, Fi 125, 127-129, 131-135, 140, 41, 115, 181, 188, 191, 195, 210,
221, 231, 295, 302, 304
Carpocapsa pomonella, . . ‘ . ‘ ‘ . ‘ ‘ . . 151
INDEX. 427
PAGE
Carpodacus purpureus, . F P . 220
Catbird, . : < : 57, 58, 108, 109, 115, "122, 125-128, 139, 181, 283, 371
food of, . ; i . 182
Caterpillars, American tent, . 117, 118, 123, 126, 127, 130-136, 195, 208, 226, 302,
304, 343
brown-tail moth, : : : . 130-140, 184, 302, 304, 370
forest tent, . i 5 » 69, 120, 125, 127, 138-140, 175
gipsy moth, . 63, 125, 126, 128, 129, 133-136, 138, 141, 144, 145,
157, 160, 175, 181, 184, 188, 195, 205, 208, 218, 226,
333, 369
oak, . a é a . . ci $ Fi i A . 272
red-humped, r ‘ ‘ F . Fl - ‘ P 272
tussock moth, . é P i a r x r 7 . 120
Cecidomyia destructor, - 8 7 ‘ Fi A ‘ : i ; . 33
Cedar Bird, . ‘ ‘: - s . 3 2 . 51, 57, 60, 69, 209
Certhia familiaris annerioane, . ‘ , . a j 3 . 177
Chetura pelagica, . . . . i : F F d . 340
Chapman, Frank M., . ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ rl : ‘81, 91, 197, 250, 386
Chebec, . * : r ‘ . ‘ é é re é i . 229
Chermes lenetfetia,« f : 4 : fi . f é A . A . 223
Cherry Bird, . ‘ * . ’ * ‘ F r " . 209
Chewink, . . bank 126, 101, 139, 218
Chickadee, . : + B8, 115, 122, 124, 129, 130, 136, 140, 143, 145, 146, 163, 400
food of, . i , ; 167-171
Chinch bug, . ‘ F Fi : i a ‘ . 27, 28, 33
Chip Bird, Chiat, Chippy, ‘ ri , ‘ : . 4 . ‘ . 803
Chordeiles virginianus, ‘ ‘ ‘ F : : . ‘i . 341
Circus hudsonicus, . F z F : ‘ : . F P ‘ . 367
Cistothorus stellaris, a . i : . ei . 7 ‘ ‘ . 350
Clercy, J. O., ‘ : i ” ¥ P . a 2 : : . 74
Coccyzus americanus, . : 2 7 : . 7 . 2 . 265
erythropthalmus, . ¥ ‘ F : ; ‘ é F . 263
Colaptes auratus luteus, ; . . . . F F 3 ; - 260
Coleman, Robert H., . ; ; é : : “ ‘ j 3 . 186
Colinus virginianus, 3 r . . . . . . . p - 325
CoWWaG.g ee % = -) & & @& 6 «© w 6100
Contopus virens, . ‘ F ® , ‘ r ‘ i i : . 231
Corydalus cornutus, 2 : ‘ i F : F : ‘ ‘ . 214
Cotton worm, . r : ; é ‘ é P é ~ B88
Coturniculus savannarum spies eintc 4 - ri - 4 i ‘ . 308
Cowbird, ‘ a 7 f . : ‘ i ‘ ‘ : - . 320
Crane, Whooping, . i : é é _ : ‘ 2 ‘ a . 67
Creeper, American Brown, . . . . : : : ‘ : 177
food of, H E : . z : ‘ . 178
Black and White, . 3 ; 4 ‘ ‘ F . . 144, 191
Crickets, western, . ‘ 65, 66
Crow, . 2, 8-11, 26, 45-50, ts, 97, 114, 15, 125, 126, 129, 137, 145, 146, 333, 369
trapping the, . . . 406
Cuckoo, Black-billed, . . 114, 115, 125, ‘128, 136, 138, 139, 142, 144, 263
food of, : . 264
Yellow-billed, . j ‘ 60, 61, 114, ‘is, 126, 128, 138, 140, 146, 265
food of, . ’ P 266
Curlews, . ‘ ‘ 68, 75
Cutworms, . 11, a1, 34, 44, 157, 160, 181, 183, "987, 291, 295, 316, 316, 318, 330
Cyanospiza cyanea, - a : 7 . 298
428 INDEX.
PAGE
Dearborn, Ned, . " 3 . 45, 48, 61
Dendroica estiva, . 4 ‘ . r . 194
coronata, « 201
pensylvanica, « 192
vigorsii, . . 200
virens, . 198
Diacrisia virginica, . 120
Dickcissel, ‘ . 855
Dike, A. C., ‘ 362, 408, 420
Diomedea immutabilis, . 82
Diplosis tritici, , 22
Dobson, , f 4 » 214
Doryphora decemlineata, . 16
Dove, 3 13, 25
Carolina, . 324
Mourning, 60, 324
Turtle, . 324
Duck, Black, . ‘ : : : . : . 353
Wood, . ‘ < 6 = c 5 f - . 353
Dutcher, William, . : ‘ ‘ . 3863, 418, 419
Eagle, Bald, . 866
Egrets, destruction of, . 3857
Elaphidion villosum, 99
Elliot, D. G., . 5 A 84
H. W., a ‘6 7 . 82
Ellsworth, J. Lewis, . 419
Euproctis chrysorrhea, 39
Euvanessa antiopa, 16
Falco columbarius, . 3866
peregrinus anatum, . 3866
sparverius, . 3866
Fannin, J., . 332
Farley, J. A., : . 283
Felt, E. P., ; . 69, 120, 247
Fernald, C. H., . 7 142, 240, 346
H. T., 37
Field, G. W., 419
Finch, Crimson, 220
Grass, . 311
Purple, 122, 125, 220
food of, - 221
Fire Hang Bird, . 3 . 224
Fisher, A. K., 3 : ¢ ; . 66, 79, 80, 206
Fiske, W. F., 2 : < ‘ é é ‘i a ‘ . 55
Fitch, Asa, . . r 7 28, 255
Flagg, Wilson, 73, 204, 287
Fletcher, James, é ‘ ‘ » 85
Flicker, ° ‘ 60, 126, 139, 146, 249
Northern, . ‘ F A . 122, 260
food of, : ; . 261
tongue of, . » 261
Flies, crane, . i ‘ 207, 211
house, . z .
208, 235
INDEX. 429
PAGE
Flies, March, . : ' ; P ‘ P Z Z ‘ . 286
May, « ‘ : x ‘ ‘4 ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ F ‘ « 130
robber, . é : 2 3 , . i . ; 239
Flycatcher, Great-crested, . ‘ ? é ‘ 114, 115, 141, 144
Least, . é x ; 7 | 114, 115, 122, 180, 133, 141, 143, 229
food of, . P : « 231
Forbes, S. A., eV Ach ty Gs. et win 60, 155, 160, 181, 183, 210, 272, 285
First, Herman, . , * . ‘ 4 . ‘ a x Ut
Galeoscoptes carolinensis, ‘ ‘ ‘ 4 ‘ “ ‘ # * « 28h
Galerucella luteola, i i ‘ é : 3 : ‘ ‘ » 207
Gallinago delicata, . : é F ‘ + . : 5 : . 337
Game birds, destruction of, . ‘5 P a ‘ ‘ ‘i ‘ 76, 84, 356
Gentry,T.G., . oo. ew eee 192, 213, 234, 302
Geolplypis inchs Drachidactya, * “ % e , : z ‘ . 186
Glover, Townend, . ‘ ‘ x x a é ‘ ‘ . 29, 251
Goldfinch, American, . 4 3 F 6 ‘ ‘ 5 . 122, 153, 222
food of, S i * z é R ‘ * - 223
Goodell, Henry H., . a . ‘ ‘ F ‘ ; . i » 36
Goodmore, 8.E., . é z r . . é é é » 68
Gophers, i z é ‘ ‘< . : 4 ‘ i ‘ » 8
Goshawk, * ‘ 2 é i ’ é ‘ é 2 é . 62, 366
Grackle, Bronzed, . F , ‘ . ‘ ‘ . 3 a . 114, 313
Purple, . x r , 4 5 ‘ ‘ % ‘ . 114, 313
Rusty, . é . 312
Grosbeak, Biae bressted, ‘52, 115, 122, 125- 128, 131, ‘133, 140, 142, 144, 145, 216
food of, . i F , ; . 218
Ground Bird, . ¥ ‘ P P ‘ “ a é P ‘ ‘ » 299
Grouse, . ‘ . : 2 i ‘. i 5 4 ‘ 4 z 13, 43
Ruffed, § . é 3 5 3 : i E ‘ 61, 99, 267
food of, . : r a ‘ i ‘ ‘ a . 271
food plants, list of, ‘ 7 é : 4 . 273
Grub, white, . . . 4 . ¥ . . ‘ . “40, 76, 181, 289
Guano, . ‘ A é ‘ ‘ ‘i . ‘ ‘ ‘ 82
Gull, Tkowiheaded, “ * r ‘i ‘ “ ‘ ‘ “ ; « 405
Franklin’s, . r ‘ ‘ ‘ < ® P . : . 61, 67
Gulls, utility of, . ‘ F ‘ . ‘ ‘“ ‘ ‘ i ‘ 80, 81
Hair Bird, . : i r F < ‘ ; F ; ‘ ‘ . 303
Hang Nest, . é . 7 ‘ : . é : F ‘ 7 . 224
Hares, . : a F . c ‘ a 7 . ‘ . ‘ . 78
Harris, T. W., 3 5 : i . ‘ : F é ‘ F . 226
Harvey, F. L., ‘i : i ‘ t . ‘ ‘i ; ‘i , . 60
Hawk, . : ‘i - P ‘ P r . 2 F ‘: é « 6
Bog, . é ‘ é 5 F 3 - : 3 P . . 867
Chicken, . ‘ 2 ‘ . é r é , Z . 366
Coopers, . 7 Fi c . 7 : . . $ ri . 866
Duck, . ‘ ‘ ‘ j . . 3 2 : : . 866
Tidlip-» Goa c© “& e. Le Se (> oe: Ge aa
Marsh, . é ‘ 4 . : ; ‘ . ei . 867, 406
Pigeon, é ‘ 7 . . . . . . . . - 366
Red-shouldered, . : : ’ ‘ é “ Fi ‘ ‘ . 366
Sharp-shinned, . 5 é . . 7 A . Fi : . 366
Sparrow, . ‘ . . . . . . . . : . 366
Hawks, trapping, . . . : - . . . . $ ‘ . 406
430 INDEX.
PAGE
Heath Hen, . % F ‘ . 26, 266
Heliophila unipuncta, . . 36
Hellgramite, . 4 . . 214
Helops acreus, " , . 178
Henshaw, Henry W., . . 419
Hemerocampa leucostigma, . + 120
Heron, Black-crowned Night, ’ . 351
Great Blue, r . 67, 352
Green, a . 351
High-hole, Hichtrolder, 260
Hill, Henry B., , . ‘ 420
Hirundo erythrogaster, 3 % ‘ : a 7 ‘ . 345
Hodge, C. F., . 5 . . sj é . 267, 269, ort, 373
Hoffman, Ralph, . 7 191, 199, 310
Hopkins, A. D., . 247
Hornaday, William T., ‘ . 354
Howard, L. O., § 153, 154, 162
Hummingbird, Biwhy-throated; ‘ , . . : : . 122, 240
food of, . ‘ ‘ . 3 » 242, 244
Hylocichla fuscescens, . . 156
mustelina, . 158
Indian Hen, é ‘ . i . . q F . 852
Indigo Bird, ; i i 7 F 137,139, 298
Insects, parasitic, ‘ « x F P a ; 18-20, 240
predaceous, . 17
transformations of, 13-15
To caterpillar, 264
Iridoprocne bicolor, ‘ 344
Isia Isabella, . 120
Jay, ‘ ‘ , 3 : 12, 94, 404, 409
Blue, : . 7 i, 114, 115, 126, 129, "139, ‘136, 138, 139, 144-146, 369
Jenks, J. Y. P., . 276, 284
Job, Herbert K., . < i 3 8 ; ij F ‘ . A . 420
Judd, Sylvester D., . 121, 178, 181-183, 186, 272, 273, 278-280, 294, 300, 305,
826, 327, 329-331
Junco hyemailis, . 300
Junco, Slate-colored, P 122, 296, 300
food of, . ‘ » 3801
Kaltenbach, J. H., ag : . § P ‘ « B2
Keyser, Leander S., ‘ a : ‘ : 3 . 178, 185
Kimball, H. H., 3 ‘ é 4 . 326
King, F. H., 5 5 175, 206, 272
Kingbird, a : . ‘114, “15, 127, 136, 141, 143, 145, 235
food of, . . ; ‘ « 238
‘Western, is ji i ‘ » 57
Kingfisher, ‘ . . . ‘ - 262
Kinglet, Goidenerawned, 4 ‘ : : . 161
sis cesar, - . 3 4 ; 4 : ‘ . 161
Kinglets, fi 7 F é 7 f . : . 160
Kirby and Spence, . a " 30, 64, 73
Kirkland, A. H., .
. 29, 37, 45, 51, 136, ‘ys, 208, 237, 252, 256, 304
INDEX.
431
PAGE
Lachnus strobi, 4 ‘ ‘ P me . 162
Lanius borealis, J . 870
Lark, Old-field, > “ . a & . 316
Larus franklinii, ‘ ‘ P P P 61, 67
-Lawrence, Samuel C., . : ‘ ‘ , . 39
Leopard moth, 4 5 . ‘ . 107
Leucarctia acrea, » 12
Lilford, Lord, é ~
Linnet, Gray, ’ “ ‘ . 220
Rea, . 220
Lintner, J. A., 28-31, 33, 34
Liparis monacha, a ; ‘ 7 4 17
Locust, Rocky mountain, ‘ ‘ 4 28, 34
ravages of, * . 67-69, 74
Lyford, C. Allan, . 118
Mackay, George H., P * . 418
Malacosoma disstria, . 69
Marlatt, C. L., ‘ “ ‘ ‘ 33, 55, 36, 39
Martin, Bee, * ; r 2 . 235
Black, . . : 5 ; . 347
Purple, a ‘ . 347
food of, . . 348
Martins, . 7 . 55
Mathews, Semuslor, é + 265
Mavis, Red, . ‘ . . . . 179
Maynard, C. J., . 51
Meadowlark, F ‘ . 316
food of, . “ . 318
Megascops asio, . 368
Melanoplus fois Grappa) 3 a ‘ « 272
Spretus, . ‘ . . 384
Melospiza cineria melodia, : : ‘ + 299
georgiana, * . ‘ . 349
Merriam, C. Hart, 7 é 59, 419
Florence, - é . » 236, 241
Merula migratoria, . . 282
Mice, field, . 17, 78, 80
meadow, . 367
Midge, wheat, . 32
Millais, J. G., sng . 405
Millinery trade, . 85, 357
Minot, H. D., ‘ ‘164, 205, 218, 308, 309, 404
Mniotilta varia, 5 « 291
Mosher, F. H., . 51, ‘59, 62, 124, 144, 184, ‘193, 195, 295, 230, 241, 333
Moth, brown-tail, . 89, 124, 180, 147, 148, 205, 234
cecropia, . 109
codling, 35, 151, 231, 250
fall cankerworm, eeue ot ‘ . 175
gipsy, . 88, 39, 128, 149-144, 147, 148, ‘192, 205, 214, 231, 232, 234, 238,
259, 333
leopard, 4 4 . 107
luna, . i , 214
nun, . : n . (17
polyphemus, é 109
432 INDEX.
PAGE
Moth, tent caterpillar, eggs os . . . . . 167, 369
tussock, Z x . é . . a « 232
Munger, H. C., . : is : . . . . 326
Musselman, C. C., é ‘ ‘ i : . 55
Nash, C. W.,.
. 44, 45, 297, 318, 330
Nectarophora destructor, é ‘ i . ‘ . 804
Nighthawk, 60, 341
food of, $ . 342
Nuthatch, Canada, a F , . 176
Red-breasted, ‘i d . 115, 176
food of, r . 176
White-breasted, . 115, 122, 171
food of, . 174
Nuthatches, . P ’ a . 163
Nuttall, Thomas, 296, 231, 251, 263
Nyctala acadica, . 368
Nyctea nivea, ‘ . 367
Nycticorax nycticorax ies, . 351
Oak pruner, ¥ » 99, 256
Oriole, Baltimore, . 70, “14, 115, 122, 125-128, 131-133, 136, 137, 140, 143, 224, 230
food of, 226
Orchard, 224
Orioles, 69, 108
Osborn, Herbert, ‘ ‘ 187
Osprey, American, ‘ 413
Otus brachyotus, . e . < . . ‘ 7 . ‘ .
Oven-bird, , » 115, 122, 124, 127, 134, 141, 144, 146, 188
food of, . . . F ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ . 190
Owen, Daniel E., ¥ « x F i : . 42, 45, 51
Owl, Acadian, ‘ F : . ‘ ‘ ‘ . 368
American Hawk, ‘ ° é . : F . 367
American Long-eared, ‘ 7 Fi _ ‘ a A . 368
Barn, . A 2 7 F : . « 79, 368
Barred, . , a ‘ ‘ ‘ 7 , . 367
Great Horned, . 367
Hoot, . 367
. Saw-whet, . 368
Screech, . 368
Short-eared, 78, 367
Snowy, . : . 867
Owls, . 7 F i 77
Packard, A.S., : 5 32-36, 111, 112, 256, 348
Paleacrita vernata, . . ; ‘ ‘ 70
Palmer, T. §., F : i : c 5 - 418, 419
Pandion hilizetus carolinensis, i . A i a ri . « 413
Papilio polyxenes, . ‘ “ P é . r . 305
Partridge, * x ‘ 3 ‘ e § . 267
Parusatricapillus, ‘ ‘ . 163
Pea louse, . x . 304
Peabody Bird, : - 307
Pear tree psylla, . 158, 377
Pélicot, P.,
’ . . 56
INDEX. 433
PAGE
Pewee, . . e r : : r ‘ ‘ a e ‘ ki . 233
Bridge, . ‘ . a . . p + 233
Wood, * * ‘ ‘i ' ‘ “114, 115, 122, 196, 141, 143, 231
food of, . ‘ ‘ - ‘ < . 232
Phasianus torquatus, . ‘ . : . . ‘ ‘ ‘ i . 332
Pheasant, Ring-necked, . ‘ r " r x ‘ ‘ ‘ r + 332
food of, . i i - ‘ i ‘ i » 333
Philohela minor, . . . ‘ F 4 F z . 336
Pheebe, . f F j C 3 e a 5 3 114, 115, 145, 233, 388
Pheebe Bird, . ¥ ‘ g ° ; F P : « 233
food of, . ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ 3 : : ‘ F » 234
Phorodon humuli, . ¥ ‘ ‘ ‘ - 2 x . a » 2
Piesma cinerea, . : F i . A . i ‘ 3 . . 174
Pigeon, Passenger, . ‘ ‘ F . é F r F 3, 328, 354, 356
Pigeons, domestic, . ¥ ‘ ‘ ‘ : 4 F y P : 13, 25
Piranger erythromelas, . F : i . : ‘ s P - . 212
Pissodes strobi, x i ‘ s 168, 254
Plant lice, 7 ‘ . 28, 62, 11, 122, 124-128, 175, 196, 208, 221, 223, 339, 344
eggs of, . ‘ £ ‘ nl + 162, 223
Platysamia cecropia, . ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ s - P ‘ » 108,.259
Plover, . 5 é é . . F : . 5 : . 26, 43, 67, 68
Upland, . 5 ¥ i ‘ F ‘ ; ; . 75, 334, 336
Pooecetes gramineus, . ‘ F ‘ “ ‘ : : a BLL
Porthetria dispar, . . j ; : . : f é . ‘ . 38
Porzana carolina, . ¥ a * 2 a " “ a r . 350
Poultry, . ¥ " F ‘ é F “ : é » 85
Prairie Chickens, . : ‘ ‘ i F é ‘i j 67, 68, 75, 76, 84
Proctor, ThomasM., . P F ‘* ‘ E s « i 93
Psylla pyri, - . ¢ - : : é 7 ‘ ‘ ‘ - 153
Quail, . 4 4 . . . ‘ ‘ . . 26, 67, 68, 75, 76, 325
Marsh, . 4 5 A ‘ B é ‘ F ‘ 316
Rail, Sora, . - - ‘ : E . : i ‘ , a . 350
Virginia, : . . A z F . . s : . 350
Railroad worm, ‘ ‘ ri . 7 . r k A : r . 231
Rallus virginianus, z é : 7 ‘ . A p A . 350
Raspail, Xavier, . ‘ x ¥ 4 . ‘ ‘ x a r . 408
Redstart, American, * : - . 115, 122, 129, 131, 135, 138, 140, 143, 196
food of, . ‘ r r F ‘ . ‘ - x ASF
Reed Bird, . : x < ¢ ‘ . . ‘ , ‘ ‘ . 822
Reed, C.A., . ‘ ‘ : ‘ ; ‘ ‘ é a ‘ . 199
Regulus satrapa, . F e ‘ a ‘ : ‘i . i i . 161
Rice Bird, ‘ P ‘ “ * > * * . ; : i . 322
Ridgway, Robert, . ‘ 2 P - F ‘ wz ‘i i 57, 157, 326
Riley,C.V-,5 002 06 8 8 8 eee 89, 84, BE
Riley and Howard, i ° ‘ . , ‘i . . . : 65, 75
Riley, Packard, and Thomas, * “ r x x ‘ . . 34, 69, 75
Riparia riparia, ‘ F . C ‘ . i i - , . 344
Robin, . . A a i . 9, 10, 16, 44, 45, 115
American, . a “ 115, 122, 129, 131-133, 136, 138-140, 147, 282, 315
food of, . r ‘ ¥ ‘ . 285
Golden, r ‘ : . . ; : ‘ : F - . 224
Ground, z - . i 5 j : : : : , . 218
Wood, . . . - . . . ; . . : - 158
434 INDEX.
PAGE
Romaine, C.E., . % ‘ 330
Russell, John S., P * : 348
Sanderson, E. D., é ‘ ’ ‘ ‘ : . 174
Sandpiper, Bartramian, . 334, 336
Spotted, z . 335
Sapsucker, Yellow-bellied, 114, 115, 262
Sayornis Phoebe, i ; q c . 233
Scale, San José, ‘ ‘ . ‘ - 151
Schizoneura lanigera, . 203, 252
Schizura concinna, . 272
Seeds eaten by birds, 281, 296
Seton, Ernest Thompson, . 343
Setophaga ruticilla, . 196
Shaw, Henry, . . 142
Shrike, Northern, 370
Shrubs, fruit-bearing, : 374
Sialia sialis, 290
Silkworm, American, ‘ 30, 108
Sitta canadensis, 176
carolinensis, . ee
Smith, John B., 107
Snipe, r 43
Wilson’s, i 337
Snowbird, 59
Black, . 300
Spanworm, currant, 112
Sparrow, Chipping, 55, 114, 115, 122, 126, 136, 143, 303, 398
food of, . . 304
English, . 21, 56, 114, 134, 136-138, 140, 141, ‘292, 294, 344, 310, 389, 407
Field, 3 114, 122, 127, 131, 140, 301
food of, op ‘ . 302
Fox, . 296
Grasshopper, . 308
food of, . 809
Ground, . 299
Henslow’s, ‘ ‘ f . 3809
House, 56, 206, 225, 292, 370
Savanna, . x ‘ . 310
food of, . 311
Song, ‘42, 14, 128, 134, 141, 296, 299
Swamp, é 7 . 349
Tree, ‘ F . 306
Vesper, “i . 311
food of, » 312
White-throated, A 5 ‘ 5 . 114, 122, 131, 307
food of, . . . ‘ ‘i ‘ - 3808
Yellow-winged, i ‘ ‘ : . . 308
Sparrows, food of, . 295
Sphyrapicus varius, ‘ 262
Spizella monticola, ‘ ‘ 306
pusilla, . 301
socialis, hs 303
Spoonbills, ‘ - . . ‘ 65
Squirrels, : i . i ‘ 94, 364, 408
INDEX.
435
Stake-driver, . ‘
Starlings,
Stockwell, J. W.,
Sturnella magna, .
Swallow, Bank,
food of, .
Barn,
food of,
Chimney,
Cliff,
food of,
Eaves,
House,
Tree, .
food of,
White-bellied,
White-breasted,
Swift, Chimney, ‘
food of,
Tanager, Scarlet, 7
food of,
es
Teeter,
Tegetmeier, w. B.,
Telea polyphemus,
Telematodytes palustris,
Terns, :
eggs of,
Thayer, Abbott H.,
Bayard,
Theronia melanocephala,
Thistle Bird,
Thompson, Maurice,
Thoreau, Henry D.,
Thrasher, Brown, .
food of,
Thrush, Brown,
Golden-beawaied,
Hermit,
Song,
Tawny,
Wilson’s, .
food of,
Wood, : .
food of, .
Thrushes,
food of,
Tip-up,
Titmice, .
Titmouse, Hisckrenpail,
Torrey, Bradford, . .
Towhee, . . 7 ‘
food of,
Toxostoma rufum,
68, 115, 122, 125,
93, 115,
PAGE
ow oe oe BBD
a ee fs
oR Cee ee. 786,87
Sw oe ee BIG
. oe ee 60, 844
a ee oe oh le Be
. 845
tes a . 345
rr, (0)
es ne 61, 346
we ue Shs fe uleag
. eee 846, 387
oe ee 844
. we B44, 389
te ew BAB
. 344
. 344
128, 340, 387
. 340
127, 135, 137, 144, 146, 212
oe ee IB
Go oe i, SG, EL
. 335
. 79
30, 108
. 229°
246, 258
96, 299
115, 134, 179
180
126, 127, 131, 179
eK. on . 188
Lo. 45, 156
. 158
. 156
115, 136, 137, 156
By . 187
126, 127, 133, 134, 139, 158
. 159
. 108
Se oe. ogi: oe EBB:
a ee ee ees)
Bt, pt hg cig: cease
we oe ae 8 168
tee ee 199
114, 115, 122, 143, 218
~ & Ge 20 58390
. 179
436 INDEX.
PAGE
Treadwell, D., ‘ . ‘ * ‘ : ‘ 44
Treat, Mary, . : ‘ S ‘ : i. A < « 2A
Tree hoppers, buffalo, . i a a P 4 ‘i ” » 212
Trees, fruit-bearing, . a < . . ‘ . 5 . 374
Troglodytes aédon, e ‘ : 2 3 5 3 . 292
Trouvelot, Leopold, » 30, 31, 38, 108
Turner, R. E., . . ‘74
Tyrannus tyrannus, . + 235
verticalis, 57
Veery, . 156
Vines, fndit-bearing, . 374
Vireo, Red-eyed, . 3 51, 115, 122, 125, 127, 129, ‘136-138, 140-142, 146, 204
food of, . ‘ i ‘ ‘ : : $ . 205
Solitary, : . 203
Warbling, ‘ ‘ e ‘ . ‘ . 115, 206
food of, a ‘ ‘ ‘i * 207
White-eyed, é é * 115, 203
Yellow-throated, . ri ° 115, “100, 125, 134, 138, 140-142, 207
food of, ‘ ‘ ‘ 3 . 208
Vireo flavifrons, . . ‘ ‘ ‘ . 207
gilvus, . . . 206
olivaceus, . 204
Vulture, . : ‘ F is ‘ ‘ . 84
Wake-up, i ‘ * * * » F . P ‘ , » 260
Walsh, D. B., ‘ 4 34
Warbler, Black and White, F 115, 123, 124, 125, "197, 130, 132, 135, 140, 141, 191
food of, a é « 192
Blackburnian, .« 102
Black-poll, Gly doo
Black-throated Blue, ‘ ‘ : . 122
Green, . F ‘ : 5 ‘ . 115, 122, 198
food of, i ‘ . 200
Blue-eyed Yellow, . 194
Chestnut-sided, ‘ 115, 122, 126, 127, 132, 134, 136, 139-141, 192
food of, . : » 194
Golden-winged, a H . : ; ‘a5, 131, 132, 134, 187, 141
Hooded, : F ‘ ki ‘i . 185
Magnolia, « 122
Myrtle, 11, 122, 153, 201
food of, . 202
Nashville, 115, 131-133, 139
Palm, F ‘ : . ‘ é 5 : ‘ é . 186
Parula, . . : é : ; ‘ . 115, 122, 126, 132, 398
Pine, é “ * F i - 200
food of, « 201
Pine-creeping, ‘ ‘ ‘ P F r : a i . 200
Yellow, . 5 ki . . 115, 122, 127, 132-136, 140, 141, 143, 194
food of, < ;: P : ; . . ~ Ans
Yellow-rumped, . . . 201
Warblers,
. 185
Warren,B.H., . 7. wee GO, 191, 206, 218, 245, BIB
437
PAGE
Waxwing, Bohemian, ‘ z ‘ . 209
Cedar, . : . 115, 131, 140, 209
food of, . 210
Webster, F. M., 259, 346
Weed, Clarence M., 45, 48, 55, 168, 183, 202
Weed and Dearborn, A 51, 57, 289
Weevil, Mexican cotton boll, 34, 330
pea, ‘ . 226
white ‘pine. 168, 254
Wells, D. A., 5 56,78
Wheelock, Irene G., . 290
Whip-poor-will, é - 342
food of, . 3843
Widmann, Otto, . 348
Wilson, Alexander, 244, 320
Wilson and Bonaparte, . 4
Wood, E. W., , . : , . ‘ 70
Woodpecker, Downy, , . 114, 115, 122, 129, 144, 146, 248, 249
: food of, s 3 : F ‘ . 250
Gaffer, é . 260
Golden-winged, . 260
Hairy, . . 114, 115, 146, 247, 248, 258
food of, . . 7 ; ‘ . 259
Partridge, * . 260
Pigeon, . 260
Red-headed, 249, 355
Wren, House, . 54, 115, 292
food of, . 293
Long-billed Marsh, 54, 350
Rock, . . 54
Short-billed een . 350
Wright, Mabel Osgood, . 223, 242
Yellow Bird, C . 194, 222
Summer, ‘ ‘ . 194
Yellow-hammer, . 260
Yellow-throat, Maryled,
Northern,
~ food of,
Zamelodia ludoviciana, .
Zonotrichia albicollis,
. : ‘ 121, 135, 188, 186
62, 115, 122, 186
. 187
ji . . 216
. . . . . 307
<]
Es
tt
ce
-
no
z
Ww
a
o
|