aml plary . 0 ete ALBERT R. MANN LIBRARY New YorK STATE COLLEGES OF AGRICULTURE AND Home ECONOMICS AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY EVERETT FRANKLIN PHILLIPS BEEKEEPING LIBRARY CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924051999724 THE Bee-Keeper’s Guide. Ra MANUAL OF THE APIARY, —BY= A, J, COOK, Late Prof of Ent logy in the Michigan State Agricultural College, Prof of Zoology P. College, Claremont, California, AUTHOR OF hee. "Injurious Insects of Michigan,” " Maple Sugar and the Sugar Bush," and " Silo and Silage.” ¥ r) EIGHTEENTH EDITION. Revised, Enlarged, Re-Written and Beautifully Ilustrated. TWENTIETH THOUSAND. CHICAGO, ILL. GEORGE W. YORK & COMPANY, PUBLISHERS. 1904 Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1883, by ALBERT J. COOK, In the Office of the Librarian of Congress, at Washington, D. C. TO THE REVEREND L. L. LANGSTROTH, THE INVENTOR OF THE MOVABLE-FRAME HIVE, THE HUBER OF AMERICA, AND ONE OF THE GREATEST MASTERS OF PURE AND APPLIED SCIENCE, AS RELATING TO APICULTURE, IN THE WORLD, THIS MANUAL IS GRATEFULLY DEDICATED BY THE AUTHOR. PREFACH. In 1876, in response to a desire frequently expressed by my aplarian friends, principally my students, I published an edition of 3000 copies of the little, unpretending ‘‘Manual of the Apiary.”” This was little more than the course of lectures which I gave annually at the Michigan Agri- cultural College. In less than two years this was exhausted, and the second edition, enlarged, revised, and much more fully illustrated, was issued. So great was the sale that in less than a year this was followed by the third and fourth editions, and, in less than two years, the fifth edition (seventh thousand) was issued. In each of the two following years, another edition was demanded. In each of these editions the book has been enlarged, changes made, and illustrations added, that the book might keep pace with our rapidly advancing art. So great has been the demand for this work, not only at home and in Europe, but even in more distant lands, and so great has been the prog- ress of apiculture—so changed the views and methods of our best bee- keepers—that the author feels warranted in thoroughly revising and entirely recasting this eighth edition (tenth thousand). Not only is the work re-written, but much new matter, and many new and costly illus- trations, are added. The above I quote directly from the preface of the eighth edition, published in 1888. Since then four editions have appeared, each reyised as the progress of the art required. In electrotyping the eighth edition, through an accident very poor work was done, so that the impressions of the last three editions have been far from satisfactory. This has led me wholly to revise the present, or thirteenth edition. In doing this I have thoughtit wise to add largely, especially to the scientific portion, as the intelligence of our bee-keepers demands the fullest information. I have thus added one hundred and fifty pages and more than thirty illustrations. All this has involved so PREFACE. much expense that Iam forced, though very reluctantly, to increase the price of the work. As our bee-keepers know, I have permitted wide use of the illustra- tions prepared expressly for this work, believing heartily in the motto, ‘* greatest good to the greatest number;’’ sol have drawn widely from others. I am greatly indebted to all these, and have given credit with the illustration. Since the above was penned three editions haye appeared, the last, sixteenth, in 1899. Each has been revised. Both the science and prag- tice have so advanced that I now recast entirely this, the seventeenvh edition. I wish again to express my thanks and gratitude to our wide-awaie American apiarista, without whose aid it would have peen impossibie to have written this work. Iam under special obligation to Messrs. Cowan, York and Root, and to my students who have aided me, both in the apiary and laboratory. As I stated in the preface tothe eighth edition, it is mysdesi.e and determination that this work shall continue to be the exponent of the most improved apiculture; and no pains will be spared, that each suc- ceeding edition may embody the latest improvements and discoveries wrought out by the practical man and the scientist, as gleaned from the excellent home and foreign apiarian and scientific periodicals. The above was prefaced to the Eighteenth one thousand published in 1900. This Nineteenth one thousand has been wholly revised, about 80 pages and 75 engravings added. We believe it is now at the frontin bee-keeping science and practice. A. J. COOK. Pomona College, Claremont, California, 1902. CONTENTS. Introduction.—p. 13. Who May Keep Bees. Specialists, Amateurs, Who Should Not Keep Bees, Inducements to Bee-Keeping, Recreation, Profits, Excellence as an Amateur Pursuit, Adaptation to Women, Improves the Mind, the Observation and Heart, Yields Delicious Food, Brings the Second Blade of Grass, Adds to the Nation’s Wealth, What Successful Bee-Keeping Re- quires, Mental Effort, Experience Necessary, Learn from Others, Aid from Conventions, Aid from Bee- Journals, Amerioan Bee Journal, Gleanings in Bee-Culture, Bee- Keepers’ Review, Canadian Bee Journal, American Bee-Keeper, Progressive Bee-Keeper, Lone Star Apiarist, Books for the Apiarist, Langstroth on the Honey-Bee, A B C of Bee-Culture, Bees and Honey, Scientific Queen-Rearing, Advanced Bee-Culture, Bee-Keeping for Be- ginners, Foreign _ Publications, British Bee Journal, Foreign Books, _Promptitude, Enthusiasm. Part I. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE HONEY- BEE. CHAPTER I.—p. 31. The Bee’s Place in the Animal King- dom. Branch of the Honey-Bee, The Class of the Honey-Bee, Order of the Honey-Bee, Family of the Honey-Bee, The Genus of the Honey-Bee, Species of Our Honey- Bees, Races of the Honey-Bee, Ger- man or Black Bee, Ligurian or Ital- ian, The Syrian and Cyprian Races, Other Races, Bibliography, Val- uable Books for the Student of Entomology. CHAPTER II.—p. 64. Anatomy and Physiology. Anatomy of Insects, Organs of the Head, Appendages of the Thorax, Internal Anatomy of In- sects, Secretory Organs of Insects, Sex-Organs of Insects, Transforma- tion of Insects, The Egg,The Larva of Insects, The Pupa of Insects, The Imago Stage, Incomplete Trans- formation, Anatomy and Physiology of the Honey-Bee, Three Kinds of Bees in each Family, The Queen- Bee, Structure and Natural His- tory, The Drones, The Neuters or Workers, Glandular Organs. CHAPTER III.—p. 165. Swarming, or Natural Methods of Increase, CHAPTER IV.—p. 171. Products of Bees, their Origin and Function. Honey, Wax, Pollen,or Bee-Bread, Propolis, Bibliography. x CONTENTS. Part IL. THE APIARY, ITS CARE AND MAN- AGEMENT. INTRODUCTION.—>p. 201. Starting an Apiary. Preparation, Read a Good Man- ual, Visit Some Apiarist, Take a College Course, Decide on a Plan, How to Procure First Colonies, Kind of Bees to Purchase, In What Kind of Hives, When to Purchase, How Much to Pay, Where to Locate CHAPTER V-—p. 207, Hives und Sections. Box-Hives, Movable-Comb Hives, Early Frame Hives, The Langstroth Hive, Character of the Hive, What Style to Adopt, The Heddon Sur- plus-Case, The Cover, Division- Board, Cloth Covers, The New Heddon Hive, The Frames, A Block for Making Frames, Cover for Frames, the Huber Hive, Observa- tory Hive, Apparatus for Procuring Comb Honey, Surplus Comb Honey io Sections, How to Place Sections in Position, Sections in Frames, Crates or Racks, Fences, Separa- tors, Foot-Power Saw. CHAPTER VI.—p. 253. Positionaud Arrangement of Apiary Position, Arrangement of Grounds, Preparation for Each Colony. CHAPTER VII.-—p. 258. To Transfer Bees, The Old Method, Hunting Bee- Trees. CHAPTER VIII.—p. 264. Heeding and Feeders. What to Feed, How to Feed, Smith Feeder. CHAPTER IX.—p. 273. Queen-Rearing. How to Rear Queens, Nuclei, Queen Lamp-Nursery, Shall We Clip the Queen’s Wing? Laying Workers, Queen Register, or Api- ary Register. CHAPTER X.—p. 293. Increase of Colonies. Swarming, Hiving Swarms, To Prevent Second Swarms, To Pre- vent Swarming, Artificial Increase, How to Divide, Capturing Abscond- ing Swarms. CHAPTER XI.—p. 306. Italians and Itulianizing. The New Races of Bees, What Bees Shall We Keep ? How to Ital- janize, How to Introduce a Queen, Valentine’s Comb Stand, To Get Our Italian Queens, To Ship Queens, The ‘Good’ Candy, Prep- arations to Ship, To Move Colonies. CHAPTER XII.—p. 321. Ertracting, and the Bxtractor, Honey-Extractor, Desirable Points in un Extractor, Use of Extractor, When to Use the Extractor, To Keep Extracted Honey. CHAPTER XIII.—p. 335. Working Jor Comb Honey. Points to Consider, To Secure Strong Colonies, To Avoid the Swarming Fever, Adjustment of Sections, Getting Bees into Sec- tions, Removal of Sections. CONTEN'S. xi CHAPTER XIV.—p. 343. Handling Bees. The Best Bee-Veil, To Quiet Bees, Bellows Smoker, The Quinby Smoker, To Smoke Bees, Chloro- form, To Cure Stings, The Sweat Theory, The Bee-Tent. CHAPTER XV.—p. 353. Comb Foundation, History, American Foundation, The Press for Foundation, How Foundation is Made, To Secure the Wax-Sheets, Use of Foundation, Wired Frames, Save the Wax, Methods, Wax-Press. CHAPTER XVI.—p. 373. * Marketing Honey. How to Invigorate the Market, Preparation for Market, Extracted Honey, How to Tempt the Con- sumer, Comb Honey, Rules to be Observed, Marketing Bees, Selling Queens, Selling Bees by the Pound, Vinegar from Honey, Fairs and the Market, What Should We Have ? Effects of Such Exhibits, CHAPTER XVII.—p. 389. Honey-Plants. Real Honey-Dew, Sweet Sap and Juices, What are the Valuable Honey-Plants ? Description With Practical Remarks, March Plants, April Plants, May Plants, June Plants, July Plants, August and September Plants, Books on Botany, Practical Conclusions. CHAPTER XVIII.—p. 454. Wintering Bees. The Causes of Disastrous Win- tering, The Requisite to Safe Win- tering—Good Food, Secure Late Breeding, To Secure and Maintain the Proper Temperature, Box for Packing, Chaff Hives, Rules for their Use, Wintering in Bee-House, Wintering in Cellar, Burying Bees or Clamps, Spring Dwindling. CHAPTER XIX.—p. 468. The Howse-Apiary and Bee-House, Bee-Houses. CHAPTER XX.—p. 473. Evils that Confront the Apiarist. Robbing, Disease, Foul Brood, Remedies, To Cure Bee-Paralysis, To Cure New Bee-Diseases, Ene- mies of Bees, The Bee-Moth, His- tory, Remedies, The Wee Bee-Moth, Remedies, Two Destructive Beetles, Robber-Flies, The Stinging Bug, The Bee-Stabber, Bee-Hawk,. Tach- ina-Fly, Bee-Louse, Ants, Florida Ant, The Cow-Killer, The Praying Mantis, Blister-Beetles, Wasps, A Bee-Mite, Remedies, California Bee- Killer, Spiders, The King-Bird, The Toads, Mice, Shrews, Skunks. CHAPTER XXI.—p. 512. Calendar and Axioms, Work for Different Months, Jan- uary, February, March, April, May, June,’ July, August, September, October, November, December, Axioms, Glossary. 2 INTRODUCTION. WHO MAY KEEP BEES. SPECIALISTS. Any person who is cautious, observing and prompt, will succeed in bee-keeping. He must expect to work with full energy through the busy season, and persist though discour- agement and misfortune both confront him. I need not men- tion capital or location, for men of true metal—men whose energy of body and mind bespeak success in advance—will solve these questions long before their experience and knowl- edge warrant their assuming the charge of large apiaries. AMATHURS. Bee-keeping is specially to be recommended as an avoca- tion. Bees are of great value in fertilizing fruits, grains and vegetables; they also save millions of pounds of most whole- some food which would otherwise go to waste ; and experience amply proves that they may be kept in city, village and coun- try at a good profit, and so any person, possessed of the proper ability, tact and energy, may adopt bee-keeping, and thus do good, gain pleasure, and often receive profit, as experience has shown, more than is derived from the regular occupation. The late Mr. C. F. Muth, of Cincinnati, long kept bees very profit- ably on his store, in the very heart of the city. Hundreds of our most successful bee-keepers live in small towns and vil- lages, and add bee-culture to their work in shop, office, or study, and receive health, pleasure, and money asa reward. Ladies all over our country are finding in this pursuit pleasure, and oppor- tunity to exercise in the pure air, which means health, and money. Farmers are adding bee-keeping to their farms, to find not infrequently that the bees are their most profitable property. Orchardists, especially, need and must have bees to pollinate the fruit-blossoms, and insure a crop. The time required willof course depend upon the number of colonies kept; but with wise management, this time may be given at 14 THE BEE-KEEPER'S GUIDE 3 any time of the day or week, and thus not interfere with the regular business. Thus residents of country, village or city, male or female, who enjoy the society and study of natural objects, and wish to add to their income and pleasure, will find here an ever waiting opportunity. WHO SHOULD NOT KEEP BEES. There are occasionally persons to whom the venom of the bee isa serious poison. If such persons are stung anywhere their eyes swell so they can not see, the skin blotches, and serious irritation is felt over the entire body. Such persons are often overcome with fever for several days. and, though very rarely, the sting sometimes proves fatal. It goes without saying that such persons should not keep bees. It is a well known fact that the sting of the honey-bee becomes less and less poisonous the more one is stung. The system becomes inoculated against the poison. My own ex- perience proves this most conclusively. Every bee-keeper will receive occasional stings, but these become more and more rare, and soon occasion neither fear nor anxiety. INDUCEMENTS TO BEE-KEEPING. RECREATION. I name this first, as it was the pleasure in store that led me to the art of keeping bees, though I was terribly afraid of bees at the beginning. Thereis a rare fascination in the study of nature. Insect life is ever presenting the most pleasurable surprises to those who study it. Bees, from their wonderful instincts, curious structure and habits, and the interesting relations which they sustain to vegetable life, are most fasci- nating objects of study. The observant and appreciative bee- keeper is ever the witness of exhibitions that incite wonder and admiration. This is why bee-keepers are always enthusi- asts. I know of no class of laborers who dwell more fondly on their work and business than do bee-keepers. A thorough study of the marvelous economy of the honey-bee must, from its very nature, bring delight and admiration. A farmer once said to me, ‘‘ Were it not for the generous profits of the busi- ness, I would still keep bees for the real pleasure I receive in OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 15 the business.’? I once asked a hard worked teacher why he kept bees. I felt like saying amen to hisanswer: ‘‘ For the restful pleasure which the work gives.”” I have often gone to the bees tired and nervous, and after an hour's labor, felt re- freshed, as by sound sleep. I have been deeply gratified many times by the letters thanking me for having turned the writers’ attention towards bee-keeping. I often think that if a person does embark in bee-keeping, commencing in a small way—and no person Should begin in any other way—the knowledge gained and consequent pleasure received will prove ample remunera- tion, even should no practical results follow. The man is broadened by the study, and better fitted to enjoy life. Some years since my old friend and college classmate, O. Clute, visited me. Of course, I must show him the bees. He was delighted, took this ‘‘ Manual’’ home with him, purchased some bees at once, and became enraptured with the work, and the result of all this was another first-class bee-keeper and that most fascinating work of fiction, ‘‘ Blessed Bees.”’ PROFITS. The profits in bee-keeping offer strong inducements towards its adoption asa pursuit. I believe few manual-labor occupa- tions offer so large returns, if we consider the capital invested. True, bee-keeping requires hard work, but this is only fora portion of the year, and in winter there is almost no work, especially if the bee-keeper buys all his hives, sections, etc., which is usually wiser than to make them. The cautious, prompt and skillful bee-keeper will often be able to secure an annual average of seventy-five pounds per colony, besides doubling the number of his colonies. This will give $10.00 per colony at least, which is almost as much as the colony, with required apparatus, is worth. Of course, poor years will con- front the bee-keeper. Winter losses will be experienced by the beginner. Some will fail entirely. The fickle, careless, indo- lent man will as surely fail in bee-keeping as in any other calling. Yetif onestudies the science and art, and commences bee-keeping in a small way, as all should, he will be no great loser, even if he find that he is not suited to the business. He knows more and is a broader man for this study and experi- ence. My brother, whoisa good farmer, with a fertile and 16 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; well-stocked farm, commenced bee-keeping more to interest his boys than aught else. He has met very little loss in win- tering—for years together none at all. For three successive years his sixty colonies of bees gave him more profits than all the balance of his farm. As he saidat one of the Michigan State Conventions: ‘‘I find my bees the pleasantest and most profitable part of my farm.’’ He added the surprising remark, ‘‘Nothing on my farm bears neglect better than my bees.’’ I might add that neglect is rarely seen on his farm. Adam Grimm, James Heddon, G. M. Doolittle, E. J. Oat- man,and many others, have made much money in this pursuit. Mr. Hetherington keeps thousands of colonies of bees, and has received over $10,000 cash receipts in a single year. Mr. Clute, an able clergyman, has often received more money from his bees than from his salary as a preacher. All over our country men are gaining a livelihood in this industry, and often earn- ing as much more in other pursuits. The opportunity to make money, even with hardships and privations, is attractive and seldom disregarded. What shall we say then of this oppor- tunity, if the labor which it involves, brings in itself healthful recreation and constant delight? Dr. C.C. Miller gave upa $2500 salary to engage in bee-keeping. ‘Though a specialist, and though his profits some years, owing to the drouth, are nothing, yet he is contented with the business, and has no idea of changing for any other. EXCELLENCE AS AN AMATEUR PURSUIT. After twenty years of experience, Iam persuaded that no business offers more as an avocation. Indeed, I think bee- keeping may ofttimes best serve asa second business. We have already seen that bees are a blessing, and I would have every person, whatever his leading business, keep a few colo- nies of bees, unless by taste, nature or temperament, he be unfitted for the work. Bee-keeping offers additional funds to the poorly paid; outdoor air to clerk and office-hand ; healthful exercise to the person of sedentary habits, opportunity for the poor to reap what would otherwise go to waste, and superior recreation to the student, teacher and professional man, espe- cially to him whose life-work is of that dull, hum-drum, rou- tine order that seems to rob life of all zest. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 17 The labor required in bee-keeping, especially if but few colonies are kept, can, with thought and management, be so arranged as not to infringe upon the time demanded by the regular occupation. Even the farmer, by wise foresight, can arrange so that his bees will not interfere greatly with his regular farm work. I have never received more hearty thanks than from persons whom I had influenced to add the care of bees to their other duties. ADAPTATION TO WOMEN. Apiculture may also bring succor to those whom society has not been over-ready to favor—our women. Widowed mothers, dependent girls, the weak and the feeble, all may find a blessing in the easy, pleasant and profitable labors of the apiary. Ofcourse, women who lack vigor and health can care for but very few colonies, and must have sufficient strength to bend over and lift the small-sized frames of comb when loaded with honey, and to carry empty hives. With the proper thought and management, full colonies need never be lifted, nor work done in tie hot sunshine. Yet, right here let me add, and emphasize the truth, ¢hat only those who will let ener- getic thought and skillful plan, and above all promptitude and persistence, make up for physical weakness, should enlist as apiarists. Usually a stronger body and improved health, the result of pure air, sunshine and exercise, will make each suc- cessive day’s labor more easy, and will permit a corresponding growth in the sizeof the apiary for each successive season. One of the most uoted apiarists, not only in America, but in the world, sought in bee-keeping her health, and found not only health, but reputation andinfluence. Some of the most successful apiarists in our country are women. Of these, many were led to adopt the pursuit because of waning health, grasping at this as the last and successful weapon with which to vanquish the grim monster. That able apiarist, and terse writer on apiculture, Mrs. L. Harrison, states that the physicians told her that she could not live; but apiculture did for her what the physicians could not do—restored her to health, and gave her such vigor that she has been able to work a large apiary for years. Said “Cyula Linswik ’’—whose excellent and beautifully 18 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; written articles have so often charmed the readers of the bee- journals, and who has had many years of successful experi- ence as an apiarist—in a paper read before the Michigan con- vention in March, 1887: ‘‘I would gladly purchase exemption from indoor work, on washing-day, by two days’ labor among the bees, and I find two hours’ labor at the ironing-table more fatiguing than two hours of the severest toil the apiary can exact.”’ I repeat, that apiculture offers to many women not only pleasure but profit Mrs. Ll. B. Baker, of Lansing, Mich., who had kept bees very successfully for four years, read an admirable paper be- fore the same convention, in which she said: ‘‘ ButIcan say, having tried both (keeping boarding-house and apiculture), I give bee-keeping the preference, as more profitable, healthful, independent andenjoyable. * * * TJ find the labors of the apiary more endurable than working over a cook-stove indoors, and more pleasant and conducive to health. * * * I be- lieve that many of our delicate and invalid ladies would find renewed vigor of body and mind in the labors and recreations of the apiary. * * * By beginning in the early spring, when the weather was cool and the work light, I became grad- ually accustomed to outdoor labor, and by midsummer found myself as well able to endure the heat of the sun as my hus- band, who has been accustomed to it all his life. Previously, to attend an open-air picnic was to return with a headache. , * * My own experience in the apiary has been a source of interest and enjoyment far exceeding my anticipations.” Although Mrs. Baker commenced with but two colonies of bees, her net profits the first season were over $100 ; the second year but a few cents less than $300 ; and the third year about $250. ‘‘ The proof of the pudding is in the eating;’’ and such words as those above show that apiculture offers special in- ducements to our sisters to become either amateur or profes- sional apiarists. Atthe present time almost every State has women bee-keepers, whose success has won attention. True it is, that in neatness and delicacy of manipulation, the women far surpass the men. The nicest honey producedin Michigan, year after year, comes from the apiary of two ladies who 1 believe are peers of any bee-keepers in our country. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 19 IMPROVES THE MIND, THE OBSERVATION, AND THE HEART. Successful apiculture demands close and accurate obser- vation, and hard, continuous thought and study, and this, too, in the wondrous realm of nature. In all this, the apiarist re- ceives manifold and substantial advantages. In the cultiva- tion of the habit of observation a person becomes constantly more able, useful and susceptible to pleasure—results which also follow as surely on the habit of thought and study. Itis hardly conceivable that the wide-awake apiarist who is so frequently busy with his wonder-working comrades of the hive, can ever be lonely, or feel time hanging heavily on his hands. The mind is occupied, and there is no chance for ennut. The whole tendency of such thought and study, where nature is the subject, is to refine the taste, elevate the desires, and ennoble manhood. Once get our youth, with their sus- ceptible natures, engaged in such wholesome study, and we shall have less reason to fear the vicious tendencies of the street, or the luring vices and damning influences of the saloon. Thus apiculture spreads an intellectual feast that even the old philosophers would have coveted; furnishes the rarest food for the observing faculties, and, best of all, by keeping its votaries face to face with the matchless creations of the All Father, must draw them toward Him ‘‘ who went about doing good,’’ and ‘‘in whom there was no guile.” YIELDS DELICIOUS FOOD. A last inducement of apiculture, certainly not unworthy of mention, is the offering it brings to our tables. Health, yea our very lives, demands that we eat sweets. It isa truth that our sugars, and especially our commercial syrups, are so adul- terated as to be often poisonous. The apiary in lieu of these, gives us one of the most delicious and wholesome of sweets, which has received merited praise, as food fit for the gods, from the most ancient time to the present day. Ever to have within reach the beautiful, immaculate comb, or the equally grateful nectar, right from the extractor, is certainly a bless- ing of no mean order. We may thus supply our families and friends with a food element, with no cloud of fear from vile, poisonous adulterations. We now know that if we eat cane, 20 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; sugar—the common sugar of our tables—it is converted by the digestive fluids into a glucose-like sugar, which is probably nearly or quite identical with honey-sugar. The bees do the same with the nectar, which is dilute cane-sugar, of flowers. Thus we may reason that honey is our most wholesome sugar, for here the bees have in part digested our food for us. BRINGS THE SECOND BLADE OF GRASS. We now know that bees do most valuable work in pollina- ting the fruit-blossoms. No orchard will give full fruitage without the visits of nectar-loving insects. Of these valued friends, no other is at all comparable to the honey-bee, in the value of its service. I know of California orchards whose productiveness has been immensely increased by the introduc- tion of an apiary. Every orchard should have an apiary in its near vicinity. ADDS TO THE NATION’S WEALTH. An excellent authority placed the number of colonies of bees in the United States, in 1881, at 3,000,000, and the honey- production for that year at more than 20,000,000 pounds. The production for that year was not up to the average, and yet the cash value of the year’s honey crop ex:eeded $30;000,000. We may safely add as much more as the value of the increase of colonies, and we havea grand total of $60,000,000—nearly enough to pay the interest on the national debt, were the bonds all refunded. Mr. Root, in his excellent ‘‘A BCof Bee-Cul- ture,’ estimates, from sections sold, that 125 million pounds of honey are produced annually and sold for $10,000,000. And yet all this is but gathered nectar, which would go to waste were it not for the apiarist and his bees. We thus save tothe country that which would otherwise bea total loss. Apicul- ture, then, in adding so immensely to the productive capital of the country, is worthy, as an art, to receive the encouragement and fostering care of the State. And the thought that he is performing substantial service to the State, may well add to the pleasureof the apiarist, as he performs his daily round of labor. When we add to this the vastly greater indirect benefit which comes through the agency of bees in fertilizing flowers —a benefit which can hardiy be computed—we then understand OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 21 the immense value which comes from bees. Truly, the bee- keeper may feel proud of the grand part which his bees per- form in the economy of that part of nature which most con- cerns man and most generously ministers to man’s wants. WHAT SUCCESSFUL BEE-KEEPING REQUIRES. MENTAL EFFORT. No one should commence this business who is not willing to read, think, and study. To be sure, the ignorant and un- thinking may stumble on success for a time, but sooner or later failure will set her seal upon their efforts. ‘Those of our apiarists who have studied the hardest, observed the closest, and thought the deepest, have even passed the late terrible winter with but slight loss. Those who fail, often fail because of just this lack of mental preparation. Of course the novice will ask, ‘‘How and what shall I study ?”’ EXPERIENCE NECESSARY. Nothing will take the place of real experience. Commence with a few colonies, even one or two is best, and make the bees your companions at every possible opportunity. Note every change, whether of the bees, their development, or work, and then by earnest thought strive to divine the cause. LEARN FROM OTHERS. Great good will also come from visiting and even working for a time with other bee-keepers. Note their methods, hives, sections, etc. Strive by conversation to gain new and valuable ideas, and gratefully adopt whatever is found, by comparison, to be an improvementupon your own past system and practice. AID FROM CONVENTIONS. Attend conventions whenever distance and means render this possible. Here you will not only be made better by social intercourse with those whose occupation and study make them sympathetic and congenial, but you will find a real conserva- tory of scientific truths, valuable hints, and improved instru- ments and methods. And the apt attention—rendered possi- 22 THE BEE KEEHPER’S GUIDE; ble by your own experience—which you wil! give to essays, discussions, and private conversations, will so enrich your mind that you will return to your home encouraged and able to do better work, and to achieve higher success. I have attended nearly all the meetings of the Michigan Bee-Keepers’ Association, many of those of California, and several of the meetings of the National Bee-Keepers’ Association, and never yet when I was not well paid for all trouble and expense by the many, often very valuable, suggestions which I received. AID FROM BEE-PERIODICALS. Every apiarist should take and read at least one of the many excellent bee-periodicals that are issued in our country. It has been suggested that Francis Huber’s blindness was an advantage to him, as he thus had the assistance of two pairs of eyes, his wife’s and servant’s, instead of one. So, too, of the apiarist who reads the bee-publications. Fle has the aid of the eyes, and the brains, of hundreds of intelligent and observ- ing bee-keepers. Who is it that squanders his money on worse than useless patents and fixtures? He who ‘‘can not afford” to take a bee-paper. It would be invidious and uncalled for to recommend any one of these valuable papers to the exclusion of the others. Each has its peculiar excellencies, and all who can may well call to his aid two or more of them. AMERICAN BEER JoURNAL.—This is the oldest American bee-paper, and the only weekly journal devoted exclusively to bee-keeping in the United States. It was founded in 1861, by the late Samuel Wagner, whose breadth of culture, strength of judgment, and practical and historical knowledge of bee- keeping, were remarkable. Even to-day those early volumes of this paper are very valuable parts of any bee-keeper’s library. Under the able- management of Mr. Thomas G. Newman, the late editor, the paper made great and continuous advancement. The contributors to the ‘‘American Bee Journal’’ are the suc- cessful bee-keepers of America, and so it has a wide influ- ence. It is now edited by George W. York, whose skill, enter- prise, and ability, are no whit behind those who founded and raised this journal to its present proud place. The publishers OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 23 are George W. York & Co., 334 Dearborn St., Chicago, Ill. Subscription price, $1.00 a year. GLEANINGS IN BEE-CULTURE.—This semi-monthly journal, which has just completed its 28th volume, has shown great vigor and energy from its very birth. Its editor is an active apiarist, who is constantly experimenting ; a terse, able writer, and brimful of good-nature and enthusiasm. Iam free to say that in practical apiculture Iam more indebted to Mr. A. I. Root than to any other one person, except Rev. L. L. Lang- stroth. I also think that, with few exceptions, he has done more for the recent advancement of practical apiculture than any other person in our country or the world. This sprightly and beautifully illustrated journal is edited by E. R. Root, Me- dina, Ohio. Price, $1.00 a year. CaNnapDiAN BEE JOURNAL.— This excellent periodical, though published across the line, is worthy of high praise and patronage. Mr. D. A. Jones wasits founder, and his ability, enterprise, and long and successful experience gave this paper great prestige. Perhaps no bee-keeper in the world has sacri- ficed more in the way of time and money, and received less for it, than has Mr. Jones, This is a monthly journal, and is pub- lished by the Goold, Shapley & Muir Co., Ltd., Brantford, Ont., at $1.00 a year. W.J. Craig is its editor. BEE-KEEPERS’ REVIEW.—Although the Bee-Keepers’ Re- view has less of years, it is already away up to the front, and an indispensable adjunct to every live apiarist. Its success has been quite phenomenal. The ability, energy, and success- ful experience of the editor, both as a writer and as a bee- keeper, fit him most admirably for his work. Not only has he won success in all departments of bee-keeping, but he has long been esteemed as one of the most able of our American apicul- tural writers. Published by W. Z. Hutchinson, Flint, Mich., at $1.00 a year. AMERICAN BEE-KEEPER.—The ability, enterprise and long and successful experience of Harry E. Hill, editor of this paper, are all well-known. It is a 20-page monthly magazine, neatly edited and wellillustrated. It is published by W. T. Falconer Mfg. Co., Jamestown, N. Y., at 50 cents a year. 24 BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; PROGRESSIVE BEE-KEEPER.—This is one of the later bee- papers, but it shows wonderful progress and great promise of usefulness. Its present editor, R. B. Leahy, is noted for his ability, enterprise, and pushing business ways. It is published monthly by Leahy Mfg. Co., Higginsville,Mo. Price, 50 cents a year. Rocky Mountain BEE JoURNAL.—This latest journal is edited by H. C. Morehouse, and is published monthly by him at Boulder, Colo. It shows vigor, and gives promise of long life and great usefulness. Its locality is very fortunate. Price, $1.00 a year. BOOKS FOR THE APIARIST. Having read many of the books treating of apiculture, American and foreign, Ican freely recommend such a course to others. Each book has peculiar excellencies, and may be read with interest and profit. LANGSTROTH ON THE HoNEY-BEE.—This treatise will ever remain a classic in bee-literature. I can not over-estimate the benefits which I have received from a study of its pages. The style of this work is so admirable, the subject-matter so replete with interest, and the entire book so entertaining, that itis a desirable addition to any library, and no thoughtful, studiois apiarist can well be without it. Itis especially happy in detail- ing the work of experimentation, and in showing with what caution the true scientist establishes principles or deduces con- clusions. The work is wonderfully free from errors, and had the science and practice of apiculture remained stationary, there would have been little need of another work. Weare happy to state, however, that this work is now revised by no less able authorities than Chas. Dadant & Son, which places it high among our bee-books of to-day. Price, $1.20. ABC or BE#-CULTURE.—This work is by the editors of “‘ Gleanings in Bee-Cuiture.” Itis arranged in the convenient form of our cyclopedias, is printed in fine style, on beautiful paper, and is very fully illustrated. I need hardly say that the style is pleasing and vigorous. The subject matter is fresh, and embodies the most recent discoveries and inventions per- taining to bee-keeping. Price, $1.20. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 25 Forty YEARS AMONG THE BRES.—This book is written by Dr. C. C. Miller, of Marengo, Ill., who is an authority on practical bee-keeping. It contains 328 pages, with 112 beauti- ful, original illustrations, taken by the author himself. It shows in minutest detail just how Dr. Miller does things with bees and makes a great success with them. Price, $1 00. SCIENTIFIC QUEEN-REARING.—This work is by that well- known and thoroughly practical bee-keeper, G. M. Doolittle. It is invaluable, treating, as it does, of a method by which the very best queen-bees are reared in accord with nature’s way. Price, $1.00. ADVANCED BRE-CULTURE.—This is a full and plain expla- nation of the successful methods practiced by the author, W. Z. Hutchinson. Price, 50 cents. FOREIGN PUBLICATIONS. The British BEE JOURNAL, as the exponent of British methods and practices, is interesting and valuable to Ameri- can bee-keepers. It shows that in many things, as in the method of organizing and conducting conventions, so as to make them highly conducive to apicultural progress, we have much to learn from our brothers in Britain. The editor is one of the best informed bee-keepers of the world. The best way for Americans so secure this journal is through the editors of our ‘American bee-papers. FOREIGN BOOKS. The best of these, indeed one of the best ever published, is THE HoNEY-BEE, by Thomas W. Cowan, of London, Eng- land. It is the recognized authority in Europe, as it may well be. Itis not only beantiful, but full, accurate, and scientific. Asa history of scientific discovery in relation to bees, it is of special interest. It deserves a place in every bee-keeper’s library. Price, $1.00. A more pretentious book is BEES AND BEE-KEEPING, by Frank Cheshire. In workmanship and illustration it is most admirable, It is a compilation from Schiemenz, Girard, Wollf, 26 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; and others. Many of the pages and many of the finest illus- trations are taken bodily, and, we are pained to say, with no credit. As we should expect, the work is not as reliable as the smaller work of Mr. Cowan. Price, $5.50. As practical guides, I do not think the foreign works supe- rior to our own. Indeed, I think the beginner would profit most by studying our American books. The advanced bee- keeper will gain much in discipline and knowledge by a care- ful reading of the foreign works on bee-keeping. Foreign sci- entists, especially the Germans, are at the head, but no nation is quicker to discern the practical bearing and utilize the facts and discoveries in science than are Americans. ‘The Germans had hardly shown how centrifugal force could be used to sepa- rate honey from the comb before the Americans had given us our beautiful extractors. The same is true of comb-foundation machines. The Germans pointed out the true nature of ‘‘ foul brood,’”’ and discovered the germicides forits cure, yet I believe ten times as many Americans as foreigners profit by this knowledge. PROMPTITUDE. Another absolute requirement of successful bee-keeping is prompt attention to all its varied duties. Neglect is the rock on which many bee-keepers, especially farmers, find too often they have wrecked their success. I have no doubt that more coionies die from starvation than from all the bee-maladies known to the bee-keeper. And why is this? Neglect is the apicide. I feel sure that the loss each season by absconding colonies is almost incalculable, and what must we blame? Neglect. The loss every summer by enforced idleness of queen and workers, just because room is denied them, is very great. Who is the guilty party? Plainly, Neglect. If we would be successful, Promptitude must be our motto. Each colony of bees requires but very little care and attention. Our every interest requires that this be not denied, nor even granted grudgingly. The very fact that this attention is slight, renders it more liable to be neglected; but this neglect always involves loss—often disaster. True, with thought and management the time for this carecan be arranged at pleasure and the amount greatly lessened, but the care must never be neglected. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 27 ENTHUSIASM. Enthusiasm, or an ardent love of its duties, is a very desir- akle, if not an absolute, requisite to successful apiculture. To be sure, this is a quality whose growth, with only slight oppor- tunity, is almost sure. It only demands perseverance. The beginner, without either experience or knowledge, may meet with discouragements—unquestionably will. Swarms will be lost, colonies will fail to winter, and the young apiarist will become nervous, which fact will be noted by the bees with great disfavor, and, if opportunity permits, will meet reproof more sharp than pleasant. Yet, with PERSISTENCE, all these difficulties quickly vanish. Every contingency will be fore- seen and provided against, and the myriad of little workers will become as manageable and may be fondled as safely asa pet dog or cat, and the apiarist will minister to their needs with the same fearlessness and self-possession that he does to his gentlest cow or favorite horse. Persistence, in the face of all these discouragements which are so sure to confront inex- perience, will surely triumph. In sooth, he who appreciates the beautiful and marvelous, will soon grow to love his com- panions of the hive, and the labor attendant upon their care andmanagement. Nor will this love abate until it has been kindled into enthusiasm. True, there may be successful apiarists who are impelled vy no warmth of feeling, whose superior intelligence, system and promptitude, stand in lieu of, and make amends for, ab- sence of enthusiasm. Yet I believe such are rare, and cer- tainly they work at great disadvantage. PART FIRST. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE HONEY- BEE. Natural History of the Honey-Bee, CHAPTER L THE BEE’S PLACE IN THE ANIMAL KINGDOM. It is estimated by eminent naturalists that there are more than 1,000,000 species of living animals. It will be both inter- esting and profitable to look in upon this vast host, that we may know the position and relationship of the bee to allthis mighty concourse of life. BRANCH OF THE HONEY-BEE. The great French naturalist, Cuvier, a cotemporary of Napoleon I, grouped all animals which exhibit a ring struc- ture into one branch, appropriately named Articulates, as this term indicates the jointed or articulated structure which so obviously characterizes most of the members of this group. The terms ‘‘joint’’ and ‘‘articulation,’’ as used here, have atechnical meaning. They refer not to the hinge or place of union of two parts, but to the parts themselves. Thus, the parts of an insect’s legs are styled ‘‘ joints ’’ or ‘‘ articulations.” All apiarists who have examined carefully the structure of a bee, will at once pronounce it an Articulate. Not only is its body, even from head to sting, composed of joints, but by close inspection we find the legs, the antennez, and even the mouth- parts, likewise jointed. The worms, too, are Articulates, though in some of these, as the leech, the joints are very obscure. The bee, then, which gives us food, is distantly related to the dreaded tape-worm, with its hundreds of joints, which, mayhaps, robs us of the same food after we have eaten it; and to the terrible pork- worm, or trichina, which may consume the very muscles we have developed in caring for our pets of the apiary. In classifying animals, the zoologist has regard not only to the morphology—the gross anatomy—but also to the em- 32 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; bryology, or style of development before birth or hatching. On both embryological and morphological grounds, Huxley and other recent authors are more than warranted in separa- ting the Vermes, or worms, from the Articulates of Cuvier asa separate phylum. The remaining classes are now included in the branch Arthropoda. This term, which means jointed feet, is most appropriate, as all of the insects and their allies have jointed feet, while the worms are without such members. The body-rings of these animals form a skeleton, firm, as in the bee and lobster, or more or less soft, as in most larve. The hardness of the crust is due to the deposit within it of a hard substance called chitine, and the firmness of the in- sect’s body varies simply with the amount of this chitine. This skeleton, unlike that of Vertebrates, or back-bone ani- mals, to which man belongs, is outside, and thus serves to pro- tect the inner. softer parts, as wellas to give them attach- ment, and to give strength and solidity to the animal. This ring structure, so beautifully marked in our golden- banded Italians, usually makes it easy to separate, at sight, animals of this branch from the Vertebrates, with their usually bony skeleton ; from the less active Molluscan branch, with their soft, sack-like bodies, familiar to us in the snail, the clam, the oyster, and the wonderful cuttle-fish—the devil-fish of Victor Hugo—with its long, clammy arms, strange ink-bag, and often prodigious size; from the branch Echinodermata, with its graceful star-fish and sea-stars, and elegant sea-lilies ; from the Coelenterata with its delicate but gaudy jelly-fish, and coral animals, the tiny architects of islands and even conti- nents; from the lowly Porifera or sponges which seem so little like an animal; and from the lowest, simplest, Protozoan branch, which includes animals often so minute that we often owe our very knowledge of them to the microscope, and so simple that they have been regarded as the bond which unites plants with animals. CLASS OF THE HONEY-BEE. The honey-bee belongs to the class Hexapoda, or true in- sects. The first term is appropriate, as all have in the imago, or last stage, six legs. Nor isthe second term less applicable, OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 33 as the word ‘‘insect’’ comes from the Latin, and means to cut in, andin no other Arthropod does the ring-structure ap- pear so marked upon merely a superficial examination. More than this, the true insects when fully developed have, unlike all other Arthropods, -three well-marked divisions of the body, Fic. 1. Respiratory Apparatus of Bee, magnified—After Duncan. a Head, b Thorax, ¢ Abdomen, ¢ Antenne, e Compound Eyes, f Air-sacs, gg’ 9’ Legs, f’ Trachee. (Fig. 1), namely: the head (Fig. 1, a), which contains the an- tenne (Fig. 1, d), the horn-like appendages common to all insects; eyes (Fig. 1, ¢), and mouth organs; the thorax (Fig. 1,b), which bears the legs (Fig. 1, zg), and wings, when they are present; and lastly, the abdomen (Fig. 1, c), which, though 34 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; usually without appendages, contains the ovipositor, and, when present, the sting. Insects undergo a more striking metamorphosis than do most other animals. When first hatched they are worm-like, and called “‘larve’’ (Fig. 39, /), which means masked; afterward they are frequently quies- cent, and would hardly be supposed to be animals at all. They are then known as pupe (Fig. 39, g). At last therecomes forth the mature insect or imago (Fig. 1), with compound eyes, antennzand wings. In some insects the transformations are said to be incomplete, that is, thelarva, pupa, and imago differ little except in size, and that the latter possesses wings. The larvae and pupe of suchinsects are knownasnymphs. We see in our bugs, lice, locusts and grasshoppers, illustrations of insects with incomplete transformations. In such cases there is a marked resemblance from the newly-hatched larva to the adult. The other classes of the phylum Arthropoda, are the Crus- tacea, Myriapoda, and Arachnoidea. The Crustaceans include the jolly cray-fish and the lobster, so indifferent as to whether they move forward, backward or sidewise ; the shorter crab, the sow-bug, lively and plump, even in its dark, damp home under old boards ; and the barnacles, which fasten to the bottom of ships, so that vessels are often freighted with life, without, as well as within. The myropods are the so-called ‘“Thousand-Legged Worms.” These are wormlike in form. The body is hardly differentiated at all. The name comes from the numerous legs, which though never a thousand may reach one-fourth that number. Myriapods have only simple eyes, and all have antenne. Of the Myriapoda the Millipeds have numerous segments, often as many as sixty, have four legs to each joint, are cylindrical, and are often pests in the garden, as they are vegetable eaters. The Centipeds have fewer joints, may be no more than thirty, only one pair of legs to each segment, and feed on insects, etc. Their bite is venomous, and the bite of the larger ones may prove harmful even to man himself. The Class Arachnida includes the spider group. These animals all have, when mature, eight legs. They never have but two parts to the body, the head-thorax and abdomen. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 35 Their eyes are simple, and they are without antenne. The wee mites belong here. They have hardly any divisions to the body. The mouth-parts form a mere portico. When first hatched they have only six legs. The so-called red spider (red mite), so destructive in the orchard, belongs here, as do also the sugar, cheese, flour, and chicken mites. The ticks are but colossal mites. Of these, the Texas Cattle Tick (Boophilus bovis) causes the Texas fever in cattle. The cause of the fever is a protozoan animal, Pyrosoma bigeminum. Thisis in the blood of Texas cattle, but is harmless. Carried by the tick to other cattle, it brings disease and death. The scorpions are also Arachnids. One of these stings as does the bee, and the sting is often quite venomous. The whip scorpion of Florida is named from its caudal appendages. It is entirely harmless. The Datames, which I call the ‘‘ California bee- killer’? (Fig. 292), and which is described among the bee- enemies, belongs here. Grandfather Graybeard also belongs inthe scorpion order. It is only useful in pointing the way to lost cows, etc. Its legs point every way. ‘The spiders are the highest Arachnids. They differ from mites in possessing two well-marked divisions of the body, and in always having eight legs, and from the scorpions in never having the abdo- men jointed. Thespiders have a poisonous bite, but rarely inflict injury to man. Their silk and spinning habits are exceedingly interesting. Spiders are almost as marvelous in their life history as are the bees. Like the Datames, to be spoken of asa bee-enemy, spiders often kill our pets of the hive. : ORDER OF THE HONEY-BEE. The honey-bee belongs to the order Hymenoptera (from two Greek words meaning membrane and wing), which also in- cludes the wasps, ants, ichneumon-flies, gall-flies, and saw- flies. This group contains insects which possess a tongue by which they may suck (Figs. 16 and 54), and strong jaws (Fig. 65) for biting. Thus, the bees can sip the honeyed sweets of flowers, and also gnaw away mutilated comb. They have, besides, four wings, and undergo complete transformations. There are among insects strange resemblances. Insects of one order will show a marked likeness to those of another. 36 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE}; This is known as mimicry, and sometimes is wonderfully striking between very distant groups. Darwin and Wallace have shown this to be a developed peculiarity, not always pos- sessed by the ancestors of the animal, and that it comes through the laws of variation and natural selection to serve the purpose of protection. Right here we havea fine illustra- tion of this mimicry. Just the other day I received, through Mr. A. I. Root, an insect which he and the person sending it to him supposed to be a bee, and he desired to know whether it was a malformed honey-bee, or some other species. This insect, though looking in a general way much like a bee, had only two wings, had no jaws, and its antennz were close to- gether in front, and mere stubs. In fact, it was no bee at all, but belonged to the order Diptera, or two-winged flies. I have received several similar insects, with like inquiries. Among Diptera there are several families, as the Gistride, or bot-flies, some of the Asilida, or robber-flies (Fig. 268), which are often fierce enemies of our bees, the Syrphidz—a very useful fam- ily, as the larve or maggots often live on plant-lice—whose members are often seen sipping sweets from flowers, or trying to rob the honey from other bees—the one referred to above belonged to this family—and the Bombyliidz, which in color, form, and hairy covering, are strikingly like wild and domes- ticated bees. The maggots of some of these feed on the larvz of various of our wild bees, and of course the mother fly must steal into the nests of the latter to lay her eggs. Soin these cases there is seeming evidence that the mimicry may serve to protect these fly-tramps as they stealin to pilfer the coveted sweets, or lay the fatal eggs. Possibly, too, they may havea protective scent, as they have been seen to enter a hive in safety, though a bumble-bee essaying todothe same found the way barricaded with myriad simitars, each with a poisoned tip. Some authors have placed Coleoptera, or beetles, as the highest of insects, others claim for Lepidoptera, or butter-flies and moths, a first place, while others, and with the best of reasons, claim for Hymenoptera the highest position. The larger brain, wondrous habits, and marvelous differentiation of mouth-organs, legs, etc., more than warrant placing them OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 37 at the head. The moth is admired for the glory of its coloring andelegance of its form, and the beetle for the luster and brilliancy of its elytra, or wing-covers; but these insects only revel in Nature’s wealth, and live and die without labor or pur- pose. Hymenoptera, usually less gaudy, often quite plain and unattractive in color, are yet the most highly endowed among insects. They live with a purpose in view, and are the best models of industry to be found among animals. Our’ bees practice a division of labor; the ants are still better political economists, as they have a specially endowed class in the com- munity which are the soldiers, and thus are the defenders of each ant-kingdom. Ants also conquer other communities, take their inhabitants captive, and reduce them to abject slavery— requiring them to perform a large portion, and sometimes the whole, of the labor of the community. Ants tunnel under streams, and in the tropics some leaf-eating species have been observed to show no mean order of intelligence, as some ascend trees to cut off the leafy twigs, while others remain below and carry these branches through their tunnels to their under- ground homes. Indeed, the Agricultural ant, of Texas, actually clears land and grows a special kind of plant on which it feeds. (See McCook’s Ants.) The parasitic Hymenoptera are so-called because they lay their eggs in other insects, that their offspring may have fresh meat not only at birth, but so long as they need food, as the insect fed upon generally lives till the young parasite, which is working to disembowel it, is full-grown ; thus this steak is ever fresh as life itself. These parasitic insects show won- drous intelligence, or sense-development, in discovering their © prey. I have caught ichneumon-flies—a family of these para- sites—boring through the bark and a thin layer of solid beech or maple wood, and upon examination I found the prospective victim further on in direct line with the insect auger, which was to intrude the fatal egg. I have also watched ichneumon- flies depositing eggs in leaf-rolling caterpillars, so surrounded with tough hickory leaves that the fly had to pierce several thicknesses to place the egg in its snugly-ensconced victim, Upon putting these leaf-rolling caterpillars in a box, I reared, of course, the ichneumon-fly and not the moth. Is it instinct 38 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; or reason that enables these flies to gauge the number of their eggs to the size of the larva which is to receive them, so that there may be no danger of famine and starvation? For true itis that while small caterpillars will receive but few eggs, large ones may receive several. Even the honey-bee some- times falls victim to such parasites, as I shall show in speak- ing of enemies of bees. How strange the habits of the saw- fly, with its wondrous instruments, more perfect than any saws of human workmanship, and the gall-flies, whose poison- ous stings, as they fasten their eggs to the oak, rose, or other leaves, cause the abnormal growth of food for the still un- hatched young. In the South it is reported that bees often obtain no small amount of nectar from species of oak-galls. The providing and caring for their young, which are at first helpless, is peculiar among insects, with slight exception, to the Hymenoptera, and among all animals is considereda mark of high rank. Such marvels of instinct, if we may not call it intelligence, such acumen of sense perception, such wonderful habits, all these, no less than the compact structure, small size and specialized organs of nicest finish, more than warrant that grand trio of American naturalists—A gassiz, Dana, and Packard—in placing Hymenoptera first in rank among insects. As we shall detail the structure and habits of the highest of the high—the bees—in the following pages, Iam sure no one will think to degrade the rank of these wonders of the animal kingdom. FAMILY OF THE HONEY-BEHE. The honey-bee belongs to the family Apidz, of Leach, which includes not only the hive-bee, but all insects which feed their helpless larvae on pollen, pollen or honey, or food digested by the adult bees. Many authors separate the lower bees, principally because of their shorter tongues, from the others, under the family name, Andrenide. In this case all the bees are grouped as Mellifera or Anthophila Latr. I shall group all beesin the one family Apide, and regard the Andrenz and their near relatives as asub-family. The insects of this family all have branched or plumose hairs on some portion of the body, broad OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 39 heads, elbowed antenna (Fig. 1, ¢d), which are thirteen jointed in the males, and only twelve jointed in the females. The jaws or mandibles (Fig. 65) are strong and usually toothed. The tongue or ligula is very long and slim in the higher genera, but short and flattened in the lower ones. The second jaws or maxille (Fig. 54, mx) are long and prominent, and ensheath the tongue, with. which they are folded back when not in use, once or more under the head. All the insects of this family have, on the four anterior legs, a stiff spine on the end of the tibia (Fig. 69), the fourth joint of the leg from the body—called the tibial spur, and all except the genus Apis, which includes the honey-bee, in which the posterior legs are without tibial spurs, have two tibial spurs on the posterior legs. Nearly all bees (the parasitic genera are exceptions) have the first joint of the tarsus of the posterior legs much broadened (Fig. 71), and this, together with the broad tibia, is hollowed out (Fig. 70), forming quite a basin or basket—the corbicula—on the outer side, in the species of Apis and Bom- bus, which basket is deepened by long, stiff hairs, These re- ceptacles, or pollen-baskets, are found only in such bees as gather much pollen. Fa N & qowmoys-Aauoyy s y ‘snsvqdosay 2 “XRIONIB AT vpare “XBIOYIBSa]Y Ysare “XBIOTIOI p0ud ‘SPUBLS [BIDIY 7 “OUNSOJUT [[BUIG 2 ¢ ‘SPURS ORIOL, COAT ‘spurs pray gaddq ¢ ‘ONT “Spuvls Peey Jao ] ‘oAr ‘JIBIY JO syusuiAag aa “WABI IO TOSSAA [BSING ap ‘sada punodwiag a “BITINR]T x we ‘Tdyed [erqey, c 2 OR, MANUAL OF THER APIARY. 141 sealed up, is fed to them. The chyle and larval food he finds to contain blood corpuscles, and he thinks them identical with the same in the blood of the bee. Schonfeld fed indigestible material like iron particles to starving bees that had brood. The chyle, the larval food, but not the blood of the nurse-bees contained thisiron. This food of the larvae then must be chyle and nota secretion. I confirmed this by feeding bees sugar syrup in which I mixed finely pulverized charcoal. The char- coal appeared in the royal jelly in the queen-cells. As the charcoal is utterly non-osmotic, it could not pass to the blood, and so could not appear in any secretion, but could and would be in any regurgitated food. This secretion then appears to answer to the gastric juice in our own digestion. Again, the fact that it is acid, makes this conclusion more than war- ranted. This experiment certainly settles the matter. Again, these same lower head-glands are foundin some insects that do not feed their larve at all, as species of Eris- talis—wasp-colored two-winged flies—and of Nepa, a genus of water-bugs. Dr. Planta and others have shown that the chyle fed to queen-larve is not the same as that fed to drone-larve, nor yet like that fed to worker-larve. If this is chyle the difference could be explained, as it would arise from variation of food. If a secretion, it could not be easily explained. ‘This view is adopted by Mr. Cowan, the ablest and most learned British authority on bees. Bordas has found two other pairs of glands in both worker and drone bees, which he terms, from their position, the internal mandibular and sublingual. It would be interesting but difficult to determine what secretion, if not all the secretions, aided in kneading the wax. As in our own development, so in the embryo bee, the mid- intestine arises from the endoderm or inner layer of the initial animal. As the ectoderm or outer layer is around this, not only the mouth and vent, but the fore and hind intestine—all but the true stomach—arise by absorption at these points, or from invagination (a turning in) of the outerlayer. Infants are not infrequently born with an imperforate anus. In such cases there is an arrest, the absorption does not take place, and the surgeon’s knife comes to Nature’s relief. Strangely 142 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; enough in the bee—this is also true of ants and some wasps— this condition persists all through the larval period. Thus bee-larve have no anus or vent, and so void noexcreta. But as known both to Swammerdam and Newport, when the last larval skin is moulted the whole canal, with its contents, is Fic. 62. HS. Section showing s'ructure of Honey-stomach, Stomach-mouth and Stomach, after Schiemenz. HIT S Honey-stomach, EF Epithelial cells. S Stomach. V Stomach valve. m Muscles. h Hairs to hold pollen, S m Stomach-mouth, moulted with the skin. As already stated, the spinning glands in the larva become the thoracic, or glands of Ramdohr, in the adult bee. The cesophagus or gullet, the fine thread which is pulled out as we behead a bee, passes from the mouth through the muscular thorax (Figs. 25 and 27) to the honey-stomach, which is situated in theabdomen. Often,as every bee-keeper knows, this honey-stomach (Fig. 36, 4s, 61 4s) comes along with the OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 143 cesophagusas we pull the bee’s head from the body. The cesophagus (Fig. 61, @) is about .20f an inch long and .02 of an inchindiameter. In form and function the cesophagus is not different from the same organin other animals. It is simply a passageway for the food (Fig. 27, 61 oe). The honey-stomach (Fig. 62, 2, s) or honey-sac is a sort of a crop or proventriculus. This sac is oval about .1 of an inch in diameter. While this organ is lined with a cellular layer (Fig. 62, HS, £), the cells are not large and numerous asin Fic. 63. Four pieces forming Stomach-Mouth, after Schiemenz. ce Cells, T m Transverse muscles. Hs Longitudinal muscles. the true stomach (Fig. 62, S, #). The muscular layers of this sac are quite pronounced (Fig. 62, m), as we should expect, as the honey has to be régurgitated fromit to the honey-cells. This is truly a digestive chamber, as the nectar—cane-sugar— is here changed to honey—glucose-like sugar—but this is prob- ably through the ferment received from the glands of Meckel and Ramdohr, and not from any secretion from the organ itself. The pollen is also very slightly digested here, as Schon- feld has shown, through the action of the saliva from the glands of Siebold, or lower head-glands. At the posterior end of this honey-stomach is the stomach-mouth (Fig. 36, 62, s, m, and 61, #) of Burmeister, which is admirably described by Schiemenz. It is really a stomach-mouth. Spherical in form, .02 of an inch in diameter, and, as Schonfeld well says, re- minds one of a flower-bud. It (Fig. 61) can be seen by the 144 THE BEE-KEREPER’S GUIDE; unaided eye, and as Schonfeld suggests, is easily studied with a low-power microscope. There are four jaw-like plates which guard this stomach-mouth (Fig. 63),and as Schimenz shows, open to let food pass to the true stomach. This same author tells us how by pressing with a needle, while viewing the stomach-mouth under a microscope, we can see the jaws open and shut. These plates have fine hairs, pointing down (Fig. 62, 4), which would, if a portion of the honey-containing pollen were taken by this very muscular stomach-mouth, retain the pollen-grains, while the honey could be passed back into the honey-stomach. Hence, Schiemenz very naturally concludes that this is a sort of strainer, constantly separating the pollen and honey as the bee is sipping nectar from flower to flower. Fic. 64. a a o fom ell “4 e Stomach-mouth in Honey-Stomach, after Cowan. A Normal. a Hsophagus. d Vales. B Raised in regurgitation. b Honey-stomach, e True stomach, As will be seen, this stomach-mouth has not only great longi- tudinal muscles (Fig. 62, +), but also circular muscles as well (Fig. 62, #). If Schiemenz is correct, then this stomach-mouth is to separate the honey and pollen. Even with this interest- ing apparatus, much of our honey has not a few pollen-grains, as every observing bee-keeper knows. The fact that nectar has much more pollen in it than does honey, makes Schie- menz’s view all the more probable. There is also a long prolongation (Fig. 62, v) from the stomach-mouth into the true stomach. This is .04 of an inch long, and is rich in cells, which are held by a very delicate OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 145 membrane which extends on still further. Schiemenz believes that this is a valve, and certainly unless drawn by the strong muscles in the walls out of the stomach as Schonfeld believes, it would act as a most efficient valve. If this does act as a perfect valve, then of course the nurse-bees can never feed the larve or queen any digested food from the true stomach. This is Schiemenz’s view. Pastor Schonfeld, however, still holds, and seems to have proved, that while this may serve as a valve it is under the control of the bee, and may be so drawn up by the very muscular honey-stomach as to permit regurgi- tation (Fig. 64). In this regurgitation of chyle, the stomach- mouth closely approximates the stomach end of the cesopha- gus (Fig. 64, 82); and so the chyle does not pass into the honey-stomach. This prolongation then isa valve under the control of the bee, and is another wonderful structure in this highly organized insect. The true stomach (Fig. 61, c, s) is curved upon itself, and is .4of aninch long and .1 of an inch in diameter. It is rugose, and the circular wrinkles or constrictions are quite regular. It is richly covered within by secreting cells (Fig. 62, s,c). The mucous membrane is folded, and hence there are very numerous gastric cells. Undoubtedly the function of the gastric juice is the same as in our own stomachs, it aids to liquify or render osmotic—capable of being absorbed—the albuminous food, in this case the pollen. This view is con- firmed by the fact that we almost always find pollenin all stages of digestion in the true stomach of the bee. We may not wonder at the varied source of this digestive secretion ; these gastric cells, the lower head-glands, and possibly Wolff’s glands. Where among animals is such thorough digestive work accomplished ? Emptying into the pyloric or posterior end of the stomach (Fig. 61, 6¢) are numerous tubules, the Malpighian tubules. These are the urinary organs, and re- move waste elements from the blood. They are really the bee’s kidneys. Like our own kidneys, they are nothing more than tubules lined with excreting cells. The small intestine is often called ileum (Fig. 61,72). This portion of the diges- tive tube is lined with very minute, sharp chitinous teeth, which Schiemenz believes are used to further masticate the 146 THE BEH-KEEPER’S GUIDE} pollen-grains, that have not yielded to the digestive action of the stomach. This opinion is sustained by the strongly mus- cular nature of the tube (Fig. 36, 4). The diameter of the ileum is hardly .02 of aninch. The rectum, or last portion of the intestine (Fig. 61, 77), is much larger than the ileum, and carries on its mucous or inner surface six glands (Fig. 36, , g), which Schiemenz calls rectal glands. It is quite likely that these may be excretory in function. Their position would make this view seem probable at the least. Minot claims that these are not glands nor absorbant organs. Fernald thinks them valvular, and believes they restrain the injesta. Before leaving the subject it seems well to remark that it now seems certain that the old view of Dufour, so ably adyo- cated by Pastor Schonfeld is, despite the arguments and researches of Schiemenz, the correct one. Our experiments with charcoal prove this absolutely. The queen, drone and larve do not get their food asa secretion—a sort of milk—but it is rather the digested pollen modified, as the bees desire by varying their own food. In addition to this albuminous food a Jaw of Drone. b Jaw of Queen. c Jaw of Worker. (Original.) the queen and dronesalso take much honey. Thus they need the glands which furnish the ferment that changes cane to reducible sugar, and they have them. If all honey were fully digested, then the drones and queen would not need any glands atall. The fact that the pollen that the larve do get is par- tially digested is further proof that this is chyme, or partially digested pollen. The jaws (Fig. 65, c) are very strong, without the rudimen- tary tooth, while the cutting edge is semi-conical, so that when OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 147 the jaws are closed they form an imperfect cone. Thus these organs are well formed to cut comb, knead wax, and perform their various functions. As we should expect, the muscles of the jaw are very large and powerful (Fig. 60). Wolff’s glands empty at the base of these, and are doubtless excited by their action—a proof that their secretion is gastric in nature. The worker’s eyes (Fig. 4) are like those of the queen, while their wings, like those of the drones (Fig. 46), attain the end of the body. These organs (Fig. 2), as in all insects with rapid flight, are slim and strong, and, by their more or less rapid vibrations, give the variety of tone which characterizes their hum. Thus we have the rapid movements and high pitch of anger, and the slow motion and mellow noteof content and joy. Landois proved many years since, that aside from the noise made by the wings, bees have a true voice. Thus he showed that a bumble-bee without wings, or with wings glued fast, would still hum. This voice is produced in the spiracles. Who has not noticed that a bumble-bee imprisoned closely in a flower still hums? Ihave also heard a carpenter-bee ina tunnel hardly larger than its body, hum. loudly. Landois found this hum ceased when the spiracles were closed with wax. Hedescribes quite an intricate voice-box, with a com- plex folded membrane, the tension of which is controlled through the action of a muscle and tendon. Thus we see that bees have a vocal organization not very unlike our own in the method of its action. The piping of the queen is probably this true voice. Landois also states that bees and other insects also make noise by the movement of the abdominal segments, the one on the other. From the enornious muscles in the thorax (Fig. 25) we should expect rapid flight in bees. Marked bees have been known to fly one-half mile, unload and return in six minutes, and double that distance in eleven minutes. In thirty minutes they went two and one-half miles, unloaded and returned. Thus they fly slower when foraging at a dis- tance. These experiments were tried by my students, and the time was in the afternoon. I think they are reliable. Pos- sibly, early in the day the rapidity would be greater. Some- times swarms goso slowly that one can keep up with them. At other times they fly so rapidly that one needs a good horse 148 THE BEK-KEEPER’S GUIDE; to follow them closely. Here the rate doubtless depends upon the queen. The legs of worker-bees are very strangely modified. As they are exceedingly useful in the bee economy, this is not strange. We findin the progressive development of all ani- mals, that such organs as are most used are most modified, and thus we see why the legs and mouth organs of the worker-bees are so wonderfully developed. The abundant compound hairs on the first joints of all the legs are very marked in the worker-bees. These are the pol- len-gathering hairs, and from their branching, fluffy nature are well suited to gather the pollen-grains. On the anterior legs the antenna cleaner (Fig. 66) is well marked, as it is in all Hymenoptera except the lowest families where it is nearly or quite absent. In the honey-bee, this is found in the queen and drone as well as in the worker. It is situated at the base of the first tarsus, and consists of a nearly semi-cylindrical concavity (Fig. 66, c), armed on the outer side with from seventy-eight to ninety projecting hairs. These teeth-like hairs projecting as fringe form a very delicate brush. Extending from the tibia is a blade-like organ—really Antenna-Cleaner of Worker-Bee.—Original. C Cavity. S Spur the modified tibial spur (Fig. 66, S)—which when the leg is bent at this joint, comes squarely over the notch in the tarsus. Near the base on the inside a projecting knob is seen which perhaps acts asa strengthener. The part of this blade or spur OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 149 that opposes the notch when in use consists of a delicate mem- brane. In other Hymenoptera this spur is greatly varied. Often, as in the ants and mud-wasps, it is also delicately fringed. Sometimes it has a long projecting point, and is thickly set with spinous hairs. That this organ is an antenna-cleaner is quickly seen by watching a bee—preferably a bumble-bee—come from a tubu- Fic. 67. Anterior Leg of Worker-Bee.—Original. C Coxa, T Trochanter. F Femur, Ti Tibia. 12345 Tarsal joints in order. Cl Claws. lar flower, like that of the malva, or by placing a honey-bee, bumble-bee or wasp on the inside of a window-pane and dust- ing its antenne with flour or pulverized chalk. The insect at once draws its antennez, one and then the other, through these admirable dusters, till the organs are entirely free from the dust. The bee in turn cleans its antenna-cleaners by scraping them between the inner brush-like faces of the basal tarsi of its middle legs, which is done each time after they are used to clean an antenna. The paper-making wasps, and ] 150 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; presume all wasps clean these organs by passing them between their jaws, much as a child cleans his fingers after eating candy, except here lips take the place of jaws. Wecan hardly conceive of a better arrangement for this purpose, a delicate brush and a soft membrane; even better than the housewife armed with soft brush anda silk kerchief, for this antenna cleaner just fits the organs to be dusted. We have seen the important function of the antennz, as most delicate touch- Fic. 69. Tin of Foot of Bee.—Original. A Pulvilli in use. B Claws in use. c.c, Claws. Ah. Hairs. p.p. Pulvyilli. t.t, Last joint of Tarsus. End of Middle Leg of Worker-Bee.—Original. organs, and as organs of smell, two senses of marvelous devel- opment in the bee. It is as imperative that the bee keeps its antenne dust-free as that the microscopist keeps his glasses immaculate. A delicate brush (Figs. 66 and 67) on the end of the tibia opposite the spur and also the brush of rather spinous hairs on the tarsus (Fig. 66) are of use to brush the hairs, eyes and face, as may be seen by careful observation. The claws and pulvilli—the delicate gland between the claws—are well marked on all the feet of bees. The claws (Fig. 67, cl) are toothed, and are very useful in walking up wooden or other rough surfaces (Fig. 68, 2), as they are used just as a squirrel uses its claws in climbing a tree. These OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY, EL claws are also used in holding the bees to some object, or together while clustering. What a grip they must have. It is as if we were to graspa limb or branch and then hold hundreds, yes thousands, of other persons as heavy as ourselves who had in turn grasped hold of us. When walking up a vertical wall of glass or other smooth metal, the claws are of no use, and so are turned back (Fig. 68, 4), and the pulvilli—glandular organs—are spread out and serve to hold the bee. These secrete a viscid or adhesive substance which so sticks that the bee can even walk up a window-pane. This is why bees soon cloud or befoul glass over which they constantly walk. We thus understand why a bee finds it laborious and difficult to walk up a moist or dust-covered glass or metal surface. The middle legs of the worker-bee are only peculiar in the prominent tibial spur (Fig. 69), and the brushes or pollen- combs on the inside of the first tarsus. It has been said that the spur is useful in prying off the pollen-masses from the posterior legs, as the bee enters the hive to deposit the pollen in the cells. This is doubtless an error. Thequeen and drone have this spur even longer than does the worker; the pollen comes off easily, and needs nocrow-bar to loosen it. It is com- mon among insects, and there are often two. The coarse, projecting hairs on all the feet are doubtless the agents that push off the loads of pollen. We have already seen how the brushes or combs on the inner face of the first tarsus of the middle legs serve to remove the dust from the antenna cleaner. Thesealso serve ascombs, like similar but more perfect organs on the posterior legs, to remove the pollen from the pollen-hairs, and pack it in the pollen-baskets on the hind legs. Mr. Root speaks of the tongue as the organ for collecting pollen. Are not these hairs really the important agents in this important work ? ' But the posterior legs are the most interesting, as it is rare to find organs more varied in their uses, andso as we should expect, these are strangely modified. The branching or pollen-gathering hairs (Fig. 71) are very abundant on the coxa trochanter and femur, and not absent, though much fewer (Fig. 70) on the broad triangular tibia. The basal tarsus (Fig. 70) is quadurate, and it and the tibia on the outside (Fig. 70) 152 THH BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; Fic. 70. Outside of Tibia and Tarsi of Posterior Leg of Worker-Bee, showing Corbicula,— Original, OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 153 Fic. 71. Inside Posterior Leg of Worker-Bee.— Original. 154 THE BEEK-KEEPER’S GUIDE; are smooth and concave, especially on the posterior portion, which shallow cavity forms the corbicula or “ pollen-basket.” This is deepened by stiff marginal hairs, which stand up like stakes ina sled. These spinous hairs not only hold the pollen- mass, as do stakes, but often pierce it, and so bind the soft pollen to the leg. Opposite the pollen cavity of the first tarsus, or on the inside (Fig. 71), are about eleven rows of stiff hairs. They are of golden color, and very beautiful. These may be called the pollen-combs, for it is they that gather, for the most part, the pollen from the pollen-gathering hairs of legs and body, and convey it to and packitin the pollen-baskets. As we have seen (Fig. 69), there are less perfect combs—similar in character, position and function—on the middle legs. The contiguous ends of the tibia and first tarsus or planta are most curiously modified to form the wax-jaws. The back part of this joint (Figs. 70, 71) reminds one of a steel trap with teeth, or of the jaws of an animal, the teeth in this case consisting of spinous hairs. The teeth onthe tibia, the pecten or comb, are strong and prominent. These shut against the upper ear- like auricle of the planta, and thus the function of these wax- jaws is doubtless to grasp and remove the wax-scales from the wax-pockets, and carry them to the jawsof the bees. These wax-jaws are not found in queens or drones, nor in other than wax-producing bees. They are well developed in Trigona and Melipona, and less, though plainly marked, in bombus. Girard gives this explanation in his admirable work Les Abeilles ; and as he is no plagiarist, as he gives fullest credit to others, he may be the discoverer of these wax-jaws. If he is not, I know not whois. The genus Apis is peculiar among our bees, and really exceptional among insects in having no posterior tibial spurs. They would, of course, be in the way of action of the wax-jaws. As before stated, there are six seg- ments to the abdomen, in the queen and worker-bee (Fig.9), and seven in the male. Each of these abdominal rings consists of a dorsal piece or plate—tergite or notum and pleurites united— which bears the spiracle, and which overlaps the ventral plate or sternite. These plates are strengthened with chitine. These rings are connected with a membrane, so that they can OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 155 push in and out, something as the sections of a spy-glass are worked. The ventral or sternal abdominal plates of the second, third, fourth and fifth segments of the worker (Fig. 72) are Fic. 72. Underside of Abdomen of Worker-Bee.—Original. w Wax Scales. w.w. Wax Scales. modified to form the ‘‘ wax-pockets ;’”’ though wax-plate would be a more appropriate name. These wax-plates (Fig. 73) are smooth, and form the anterior portion of each of these ventral plates. Each is margined with arim of chitine, which gives it strength, and makes “pocket ’? a more appropriate name, wp Wax-Plates. ch Compound Hairs. especially as the preceding segment shuts over these wax- plates. The posterior portion—less than half the sternite (Fig. 73)—bears compound hairs, and shuts over the succeed- 156 THE BEH-KEEPER’S GUIDE}; ing wax-pocket. These wax-pockets are absent, of course, in queen and drones. Inside the wax-plates are the glands that secrete the wax. When the wax leaves these glands it is liquid, and passes by osmosis through the wax-plate and is molded on its outer face. The worker-bees possess at the end of the abdomen an organ of defense, which they are quick to use if occasion demands. Female wasps, the females of the family Mutillide, and worker and queen ants, also possessa sting. In all other Hymenoptera, like Chalcid and Ichneumon flies, gall-flies, saw- flies, horn-tails, etc., while there is no sting, the females have a long, exserted ovipositor, which, in these families, replaces the sting, and is useful, not as an organ of defense, but as an auger or saw, to prepare for egg-laying, or else, asin case of the gall-flies, to wound and poison the vegetable tissue, and thus by irritation to cause the galls. This organ in the worker-bee is straight, and not curved as is the sting of the queen. The poison which is emitted in stinging, and which causes the severe pain, is bothan acid and an alkaline liquid, which Carlet shows are both necessary for maximum results. These are secreted by a double tubular gland (Fig. 38, Pg.) and stored in a sac (Fig. 74, c, and 38, Pd.) which is about the size of a flax-seed. This sac is connected by a tube (Fig. 74, J7) with the reservoir of the sting. The sting is a triple organ consisting of three sharp hollow spears, which are very smoothand of exquisite polish. If we magnify the most beautifully wrought steel instrument, it looks rough and unfinished; while the parts of the sting, however highly magnified, are smooth and perfect. The true relation of the ‘three parts of the sting was accurately described by Mr. J. R. Bledsoe, in the American Bee Journal, Vol. VI, page 29. The action in stinging, and the method of extruding the poison, are well described in a beautifully illustrated article by Mr. J. D. Hyatt, in Vol. I, No. 1, of American Quarterly Microscopical Journal. The larger of the three awls (Fig. 74, 4) usually, though incorrectly, styled a sheath, has a large cylindrical reservoir at its base (Fig. 74, S), which is‘entirely shut off from the hollow (Fig. 74, H) in the more slender part of the awl, which latter serves no purpose whatever, except to give OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 157 strength and lightness. Three pairs of minute barbs (Fig. 74) project like the barbs on a fish-hook, from the end of this awl. The reservoir connects at its base with the poison-sac and below, by a slit, with the opening (Fig. 74, V) made by the Fic. 74. Sting with Lancets drawn one side, cross-section of Sting, and a tanta, much magnified.—Original. C Poison sac. M Tube from sac to S Reservoir. A Awl. reservoir. E,E Valves. 0, U Barbs. B,B Lancets. "HT Hollow in awl. rf Hollows in lancets. 0, 0 Openings from hollow 7,7 Ridges in awl. ” Groove in lancet. in lancets. approximation of the three awls. The other two awls (Fig. 74, B, B), which we call lancets, are also hollow (Fig. 74, J, /). They are barbed (Fig. 74, U, UV) much like a fish-hook, except 158 THE BEH-KEEPER’S GUIDE; that there are eight or ten barbs instead of one. Five of the barbs are large and strong. These barbs catch hold and cause the extraction of the sting when the organ is used. Near the base of each lancet is a beautiful valvular organ (Fig. 74, Z, £). Mr. Hyatt thought these acted like a hydraulic ram, and by suddenly stopping the current forced the poison through the hollow lancets. It seems more probable that the view of Mr. T.G. Bryant (Hardwick’s Science Gossip, 1875) is the more correct one. He suggests that these are really suction-valves— pistons, so to speak—which, as the piston-rods—the lancets— push out, suck the poison from the sacs. Carlet shows that the poison-sac is not muscular, so the pumping is necessary. The hollow inside each lancet (Fig. 74, 7, 7), unlike that of the awl, is useful. It opens anteriorly in front of the first six barbs (Fig. 74, 0, 0), as shown by Mr. Hyatt, and posteriorly just back of the valves into the central tube (Fig. 74, 4), and through it into the reservoir (Fig. 74, S). The poison then can pass either through the hollow lancets (Fig. 74, 7, 7) or through the central tubes (Fig. 74, VV), between the three spears. The lancets are held to the central piece by projections (Fig. 74, 7, 7) from the latter, which fit into corresponding grooves (Fig. 74, 7) of the lancets. In the figure the lancets are moved one side to show the barbs and valves; normally they are held close together, and thus form the tube (Fig. 74, N, Fig. 44, St.) At the base of the central awl two flexible arms (Fig. 75, 5,0) run out and up, where they articulate with strong levers (Fig. 75, D,D). The two lancets are singularly curved and closely joined to the flexible arms by the same kind of dovetailed groove and projection already described. These lancets con- nect at their ends (Fig. 75, c, c) with heavy triangular levers (Fig. 75, B, B), and these in turn with both Cand Datjands. All of these levers, which also serve as fulcra (Fig. 75, B, C and J), are very broad, and so give great space for muscular attachment (Fig. 75, m). These muscles, by action, serve to compress the poison-sac, also cause the lever (Fig. 75, B) to rotate about S as a center, and thus the whole sting is thrown out something as a knee-joint works, and later the lancets are pushed alternately further into the wound, till stopped by the OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 159 valves striking against the farther end of the reservoir, in the central awl (Fig. 74, S). As Hyatt correctly states in his excellent article, the so-called sheath first cuts or pierces, then the lancets deepen the wound. Beside the sting are two feeler- like organs (Fig. 75, £, £), which doubtless determine where best to insert the sting, though usually there would seem little time for consideration. Leuckart discovered a second smaller gland (Fig. 38, Sy,) mentioned also by Girard and Vogel, which also has a sac or reservoir where its secretion is stored. This secretion, as first suggested by Leuckart, is supposed to act asa lubricant to keep the sting in good condition. The fact that muscles connect the various parts (Fig. 75) explains Fie. 75. Sting of Worker-Bee, modified from Hyatt and Bryant. -how a sting may act, even after the bee is apparently lifeless, or, what is even more wonderful, after it has been extracted from the bee. Dr. Miller thinks a sting extracted months before may still act. The barbs hold one lancet as a fulcrum for the other, and so long as the muscles are excitable, so long is a thrust possible. Thus I have known a bee, dead for hours, to sting. A wasp, dead more than a day, with the abdomen cut off, made a painful thrust, and stings extracted for several 160 THE BER-KEEPER’S GUIDE} minutes could still bring tears by their entering the flesh. In stinging, the awl first pierces, then the lancets follow. As the lancets push in, the valves force the poison already crowded into the reservoir forward, close the central tube, when the poison is driven through the lancets themselves, and comes out by the openings near the barbs (Fig. 74, 0, 0). The drop of poison which we see on the sting when the bee is slightly irritated, as by jarring the hive on acold day, is pushed through the central opening by muscular contraction attend- ant upon the elevation of the abdomen and extrusion of the sting. The young microscopists will find it difficult to see the barbs, especially of the central awl, as it is not easy to turn the parts so that they will show. Patience and persistence, however, will bring success. Owing tothe barbs the sting is often sacrificed by use. As the sting is pulled out, the body is so lacerated that the bee dies. Sometimes it will live several hours, and even days, but the loss of the sting is surely fatal, as my students have often shown by careful experiment. It is hardly necessary to say that there is no truth in the statement that the sting is used to polish the comb; nor doI think there is any shadow of foundation for the statement that poison from the sting is dropped into the honey-cells to preserve the honey. The formic acid of honey doubtless comes from the honey- stomach. Each is an animal secretion. The workers hatch from impregnated eggs, which can only come from a queen that has met a drone, and are always laid in the small, horizontal cells (Fig. 78, c). It is true that workers are very rarely reared in drone-cells when the rim is constricted. Mr. Root found that larger cells of foundation were likewise narrowed. These eggs are in no wise different, so far as we can see, from those which are laid in the drone or queen cells. All are cylindrical and slightly curved (Fig. 39, a, 6), and are fastened by one end to the bottom of the cell, and a little to one side of the center. The eggs will not hatch unless a little food is added. Is thisabsorbed, or does it soften the shell so as to make exit possible? Girard says that the egg on the first day stands oblique to the bottom of the cell, is more inclined the second day, and is horizontal the third day. As in other animals, the eggs from different queens vary per- OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 161 ceptibly in size. As already shown, these are voluntarily fer- tilized by the queen as she extrudes them, preparatory to fastening them in the cells. These eggs, though small—one- sixteenth of an inch long—may be easily seen by holding the comb so that the light will shine into the cells. With experi- ence they are detected almost at once, but I have often found it quite difficult to make the novice see them, though very plainly visible to my experienced eye. The egg hatches in threedays. The larva (Fig. 39, d, e, /), incorrectly called grub, maggot—and even caterpillar, by Hun- ter—is white, footless, and lies coiled upin the cell till near maturity. It is fed a whitish fluid, the chyle already described, though this seems to be given grudgingly, as the larva never seems to have more than it wishes toeat, so itis fed quite frequently by the mature workers. It would seem that the workers fear an excessive development, which, as we have seen, is most mischievous and ruinous, and work to prevent the same by a mean and meager diet. Not only do the worker- larve receive the chyle grudgingly, but just at the last, before the cellis sealed, a different diet is given. There are more albuminoids and fats, and less carbohydrates, as shown by Dr. de Planta. Itis probable that honey is also given them, and so Dufour was wholly right in urging that digested food was fed to the larve, for honey is digested nectar. This added honey is what probably changes the food. He was also correct in supposing the food of the larva to beasort of chyle. M. Quinby, Doolittle, and others, say water is also an element of this food. But bees often breed very rapidly when they do not leave the hive at all, and so water, other than that contained in the honey, etc.,can not be added. The time when bees seem to need water, and so repair to the rill and the pond, is during the heat of spring and summer, when they are the most busy. May this not be quaffed for the most part to slake their own thirst? If wateris carried to the hives it is doubtless given to the nurse-bees. They may need water when the weather is hot and brood-rearing at its very heigtit. There is no reason to doubt that bees, like all other active animals, need water as they do salt, to aid the physiological processes. They cool by evaporation, and need water to promote the process. 162 THE BEE-KEERPER’S GUIDE}; When they smother, is not the moisture about themin part the water of respiration rather than exclusive honey ? At first the larve lie at the bottom of the cells, in the cream-like ‘‘ bee-milk.’? Later they curl up, and, when fully grown, are straight (Fig. 39, 7). They now turn head down and cast their skin and digestive canal, then turn with their heads towards the mouth of the cell (Fig. 39, /). Before this, however, the cell has been capped. In eight days (Root says nine or ten) from the laying of the egg, the worker-cell, like the queen-cell, is capped over by the worker-bees. This cap is composed of pollen and old wax, so it is darker, more porous, and more easily broken than the caps of the honey-cells; it is also more convex (Fig. 39, &). The larva, now full grown, having lapped up all the food placed before it, spins its silken cocoon, so excessively thin that it requires a great number to appreciably reduce the size of the cell. The silken part of the cocoon extends down from the cap but a short distance, but like moths and many other insects, the larval bee, just before it pupates, spreads a thin glue or varnish over the entire inner part of the cell. These cocoons, partly of silk and partly of glue, are well seen when we reduce combs to wax withthe solar wax- extractor. These always remain inthe cells after the bees escape, and give to old comb its dark color and great strength. Yet they aresothin that.cells used even fora dozen years, seem to serve as well for brood as when first used. Indeed, I have good combs which have been in constant use niheteen years. As before stated, the larva sheds its skin, and at the last moults the alimentary canal or digestive tube with its con- tents as well. These, as stated by Vogel, are pushed to the bottom of the cell. In three days the insect assumes the pupa state (Fig. 39, g). In allinsects the spinning of the cocoon seems an exhaustive process, for so faras I have observed, and that is quite at length, this act is succeeded by a variable period of repose. By cutting open cells it is easy to determine just the date of forming the cocoon, and of changing to the pupa state. The pupa looks like the mature bee with all its appendages bound close about it, though the color is still whitish. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 163 In twenty-one days, it may be twenty with the best condi- tions, the bees emerge from thecells. Every bee-keeper should hold in memory these dates: Three days for the egg, six for the larva, and twelve days after the larva is sealed over. Of course, there may be slight variations, as the temperature of the colony is not always just the same. The old writers were quite mistaken in thinking that the advent of these was an occasion of joy and excitement among the bees. All apiarists have noticed how utterly unmoved the bees are, as they push over and crowd by these new-comers in the most heedless and discourteous manner imaginable. Wildman tells of seeing the workers gathering pollen and honey the same day that they came forth from the cells. This idea is quickly disproved if we Italianize black bees. We know that for some days—usually about two weeks if the col- ony isin a normal condition, though if all the bees are very young it may be only one week—these young bees do not leave the hive at all, except in case of swarming, when bees even too” young to fly will attempt to go with the crowd. However, the young bees do fly out for a sort of ‘‘ play spell’’ before they commence regularly to work in the field. They doubtless wish to try their wings. These young bees, like young drones and queens, are much lighter colored when they first leave the cell. The worker-bees never attain a greatage. Those reared in autumn may live for eight or nine months, and if in queen- less colonies, where little labor is performed, even longer; while those reared in spring will wear out in three months, and when most busy will often die in from thirty to forty-five days. None of these bees survive the year through, so there isa limit tothe number which may existin a colony. Asa good queen will lay, when in her best estate, three thousand eggs daily, and as the workers live from one to three months, it might seem that forty thousand was too small a figure for the number of workers. Without doubt a greater number is possible. That it is rare is not surprising, when we remember the numerous accidents and vicissitudes that must ever attend the individuals of these populous communities. The function of the worker-bees is to do all the manual labor of the hives. ‘They secrete the wax, which, as already 164 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; stated, forms in small scales (Fig. 72, w) under the over-lap- ping rings under the abdomen. I have found these wax- scales on both old and young. According to Fritz Muller, the admirable German observer, so long a traveler in South America, the bees of the genus Melipona secrete the wax on the back. The young bees commence work ina day from the cells. They build the comb, ventilate the hive, feed the larva, queen and drones, and cap the cells. The older bees—for, as readily seen in Italianizing, the young bees do not usually go forth for the first two weeks—gather the honey, collect the pollen, or bee-bread as itis generally called, bring in the propolis or bee-glue, which is used to close openings and as a cement, supply the hive with water (?), defend the hive from all im- proper intrusion, destroy drones when their day of grace is past, kill and arrange for replacing worthless queens, destroy inchoate queens, drones, or even workers, if circumstances demand it, and lead forth a portion of the bees when the con- ditions impel them to swarm. When there are no young bees, the old bees will act as housekeepers and nurses, which they otherwise refuse to do. The young bees, on the other hand, will not go forth to glean, at less than six days of age, even though there are no old bees to do this necessary part of bee-duties. An indirect function of all the bees is to supply animal heat, as the very life of the bees requires that the temperature inside the hive be main- tained at a rate considerably above freezing. In the chemical processes attendant upon nutrition, much heat is generated, which, as first shown by Newport, may be considerably aug- mented at the pleasure of the bees, by forced respiration. The bees, by a rapid vibration of their wings, have the power to ventilate their hives and reduce the temperature when the weather is hot. Thus they are able to moderate the heat of summer, and temper the cold of winter. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 165 CHAPTER IIL SWARMING, OR THE NATURAL METHODS OF INCREASE. The natural method by which an increase of colonies among bees is secured, is of great interest, and though it has been closely observed, and assiduously studied for a long period, and has given rise to theories as often absurd as sound, yet even now it is a fertile field for investigation, and will repay any who may come with the true spirit of inquiry, for there is much concerning it whichis involved in mystery. Why do bees swarm at unseemly times? Why is the swarm- ing spirit so excessive at times and so restrained at other sea- sons? ‘These and other questions we are to apt to refer to _erratic tendencies of the bees, when there is no question but that they follow naturally upon certain conditions, perhaps intricate and obscure, which it is the province of the investi- gator to discover. Who shall be first to unfold the principles which gévern these, as all other actions of the bees ? In the spring or early summer, when the hive has become very populous, the queen, asif conscious that a home could be overcrowded, and foreseeing such danger, commences to deposit drone-eggs in drone-cells, which the worker-bees, perhaps moved by like consideration, begin to construct, if they are not ‘already in existence. Drone-comb is almost sure of construc- tion at such times. In truth, if possible the workers will always build drone-comb. No sooneris the drone-brood well under way, than the large, awkward queen-cells are com- menced, often to the number of ten or fifteen, though there may be not more than three or four. The Cyprian and Syrian bees often start from fifty to one hundred queen-cells. In these, eggs are placed, and the rich royal jelly added, and soon, often before the cells are even capped, and very rarely 166 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; before a cellis built—Mr. Doolittle says the first swarms of the season never leave until there are capped cells—if the bees are crowded, the hives unshaded, and the ventilation insuffi- cient, some bright day, usually about eleven o’clock, after an unusual disquiet both inside and outside the hive, a large part of the worker-bees—being off duty for the day, and having previously loaded their honey-sacs—rush forth from the hive as if alarmed by the cry of fire. Crowded, unshaded and illy ventilated hives hasten swarming. Swarming rarely takes place except on bright, pleasant days, and is most common from eleven to two o’clock. The bees seem off duty for the day. They load their honey-stomachs, and amid a great com- motion inside the hive and out, they push forth with the queen, though she is never leader, and is frequently late in her exit. Dr. Miller once had a swarm from a colony from which he had taken a queen an hour before. Of course, the swarm returned to the hive. It is often asserted that beesdo no gathering on the day they swarm, previous to leaving the hive. Thisis not true. Mr. Doolittle thinks they are just as active as on other days. The queen, however, is off duty for some time before the swarm leaves. She even lays scantily for two or three days prior to this event. This makes the queen lighter, and prepares her for her long, wearying flight. In her new home she does no laying for several hours. The assertion that bees always cluster on the outside preliminary to swarming, is not true. The crowded hive makes this common, though in a well-man- aged apiary it is very infrequent. The bees, once started on their quest for a new home, after many gyrations about the old one, dart forth to alight upon some bush (Fig. 76), limb, or fence, though in one case J knew the first swarm of bees to leave at once for parts unknown, without even waiting to cluster. After thus meditating for the space of from one to three hours, upon a future course, they again take wing and leave for their new home, which they have probably already sought out, and fixed up. Some suppose the bees look up a home before leaving the hive, while others claim that scouts are in search of one while the bees are clustered. The fact that bees take a right-line to Fic. 76. Hiving a Swarm.—From Department of Agriculture. 168 THE BERE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; their new home, and fly too rapidly to look as they go, would argue that a home is pre-empted, at least, before the cluster is dissolved. The fact that the cluster remains sometimes for hours—even over night—and at other times for a brief period, hardly more than fifteen minutes, would lead us to infer that the bees cluster while waiting for anew home to be found. Yet, why do bees sometimes alight after flying a long distance, as did a first swarm one season upon our College grounds? Was their journey long, so that they must needs stop to rest, or were they flying at random, not knowing whither they were going? This matter is no longer a matter of question. I now know of several cases where bees have been seen to clean out their new home the day previous to swarming. In each case the swarm came and took possession of the new home the day after the house-cleaning. ‘Thereason of clustering is no doubt to give the queen a rest before her long flight. Her muscles of flight are all ‘‘soft,’? as the horsemen would say. She must find this a severe ordeal, even after the rest. If for any reason the queen should fail to join the bees, and rarely when she is among them, possibly because she finds she is unfit for the journey, they will, after having clustered, return to their old home. They may unite with another swarm, and enter another hive. Many writers speak of clustering as rare unless the queen is with the swarm. A large experience convinces me that the reverse is quite the case. The youngest bees will remain in the old hive, to which those bees which are abroad in quest of stores will return. Most of these, however, may be in time to join the emigrants. The presence of young bees on the ground immediately after a swarm has issued—those with flight too feeble to join the rovers—will often mark the previous home of the swarm. Mr. Doolittle confines a teacupful, or less, of the bees when he hives the swarm, and after the colony is hived he throws the confined bees up in the air, when he says they will at once go to the hive from which the swarm issued. Soon, in seven days, often later if Italians—Mr. E. E. Hasty says in from six to seventeen days—the first queen will come forth from her cell, and in two or three days she will, or may, lead a new swarm forth; but before she does this, the peculiar note, known as the piping of the queen, may be heard. OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 169 This piping sounds like “ peep,” ‘‘ peep,” is shrill and clear, and can be plainly heard by placing the ear to the hive, nor would it be mistaken. This sound is Landois’ true voice, as it is made even in the cell, and also by a queen whose wings are cut off. Cheshire thinks this sound is made by friction of the segments, one upon the other, as the queen moves them. The newly hatched queen pipes in seven or eight hours after com- ing from the cell. She always pipes if a swarm is to issue, and if she pipes a second swarm will go unless weather or man interferes. The second swarm usually goes in from thirty-five to forty-five hours after the piping is heard. This piping of the liberated queen is followed by a lower, hoarser note, made by a queen still within the cell. The queen outside makes a longer note followed by several shorter ones; the enclosed queens repeat tones of equallength. This piping is best heard by placing the ear to the hive in the evening or early morning. If heard, we may surely expect a swarm the next day but one following, unless the weather be too unpleasant. Some have supposed that the cry of the liberated queen was that of hate, while that by the queen still imprisoned was either enmity or fear. Never will anafter-swarm leave, unless preceded by this peculiar note. Queens occasionally pipe at other times, even in acage. This is probably a note of alarm, as the attendant bees are always aroused by it. At successive periods of one or two days, though the third swarm usually goes two days after the second, one, two, or even three more swarms may issue from the old home. Mr. Langstroth knew five after-swarms to issue, and others have reported eight andten. Thecells are usually guarded by the workers in all such cases against the destruction of the queen. These last swarms, all after the first, will each be heralded by the piping of the queen. ‘They will be less particular as to the time of day when they issue, as they have been known to leave before sunrise, and even after sunset. The well-known api- arist, Mr. A. F. Moon, once knew a second swarm to issue by moonlight. They will, asa rule, cluster further from the hive. The after-swarms are accompanied by the queen, and in case swarming is delayed, may be attended by a plurality of queens. I have counted five queens in a second swarm. Berlepsch and 170 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; Langstroth each saw eight queens issue witha swarm, while others report even more. Mr. Doolittle says the guards leave the cells when the queen goes out, and then other queens, which have been fed for days in the cells, rush out and go with the swarm. He says he had known twenty to go with third swarms. I have seen several young queens liberated in a colony. How does Mr. Doolittle explain that? Mr. Root thinks that a plurality of queens only attends the last after- swarm, when the bees decide to swarm no more. These virgin queens fly very rapidly, so the swarm will seem more active and definite in its course than will first swarms, and are quite likely to cluster high upif tall trees are near by. When the swarming is delayed it is likely that the queens are often fed by the workers while yet imprisoned in the cells. The view is generally held that these queens are kept in the cells that the queen which has already come from the cell may not kill them. The cutting short of swarming preparations before the sec- ond, third, or even the first swarm issues, is by no meansa rare occurrence. This is effected by the bees destroying the queen-cells, and sometimes by a general extermination of the drones, and is generally to be explained by a cessation of the honey-yield. Cells thus destroyed are easily recognized, as they are torn open from the side (Fig. 45, Z) and not cut back from the end. It is commonly observed that while a moderate yield of honey is very provocative of swarming, a heavy flow seems frequently to absorb the entire attention of the bees, and so destroy the swarming impulse entirely. Swarming-out at other times, especially in late winter and spring, is sometimes noticed by apiarists. This is doubtless due to famine, mice, ants, or some other disturbing circum- stance which makes the hive intolerable to the bees. In such cases the swarm is quite likely to join with some other colony of the apiary. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 171 CHAPTER IV. PRODUCTS OF BEES; THEIR ORIGIN AND FUNCTION. Among all insects, bees stand first in the variety of the useful products which they give us, and, next to the silk-moths, in the importance of these products. They seem the more remarkable and important in that so few insects yield articles of commercial value. True, the cochineal insect, a species of bark-louse, gives us an important coloring material; the lac insect, of the same family, gives us the important element of our best glue—shellac; another scale insect forms the Chi- nese wax of commerce; the blister-beetles afford an article prized by the physician, while we are indebted to one of the gall-flies for a valuable element of ink; but the honey-bee affords not only a delicious article of food, but also another article of no mean commercial rank, namely, wax. We will proceed to examine the various products which come from bees. HONEY. Of course, the first product of bees, not only to attract attention, but also in importance,.is honey. And what is honey? It is digested nectar, a sweet, neutral substance gathered from the flowers. This nectar contains much water, though the amount is very variable, a mixture of several kinds _of sugar and a small amount of nitrogenous matter in the form of pollen. Nectar is peculiar in the large amount of sucrose or cane-sugar which itcontains. Often there is nearly or quite as much of this as of all the other sugars. We can not, therefore, give the composition of honey. It will be as various as the flowers from which it is gathered. Again, the thoroughness of the digestion will affect the composition of honey. This digestion is doubtless accomplished through the aid of the saliva—that from the racemose glands of the head and thorax (Fig. 59, /hg, lg, and Fig. 61, No, 2 and No. 3). 172 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; The composition of honey is of course very varied. Thus analyses give water all the way from 15 to 30 percent. The first would be fully ripe, the last hardly the product we should like to market. , The reducing sugars—so called because they can reduce the sulphate of copper when made strongly alkaline by the addition of caustic potash or soda—include all vegetable sugars but sucrose of cane-sugar; and consist mainly of dextrose, which turns the ray of polarization to the right, and levulose, which turns the ray to the left. Dextrose and levulose are both pro- ducts of various fruits, as wellas honey. Dextrose and levu- lose are also called invert sugars ; because, when cane-sugar is heated with a mineral acid, like hydrochloric acid, it changes from cane-sugar, which revolves the polarized ray to the right, to dextrose and levulose; but the latter is most effective, so now the ray turns to the left, hence the terms inversion, or invert sugar. Glucose is a term which refers to both dextrose and levulose, and is synonymous with grape-sugar. The amount of reducing sugars varies largely, as shown by numerous analyses, usually from 65 to 75 percent ; though a few analyses of what it would seem must have been pure honeys, have shown less than 60 percent. Butin such cases there was an excess of cane-sugar. It seems not improbable that in such cases honey was gathered very rapidly, and the bees not having far to fly did not fully digest the cane-sugar of the nectar. Dr. J. Campbell Brown, in a paper before the British Association, gave as an average of several analyses 73 percent of invert or reducing sugars ; 36 and 45-100 percent was levulose, and 36 and 57-100 percent was dextrose. Almost always pure honey gives a left rotation of from two to twelve degrees. This wide variation is suggestive. Does it not show that very likely the honey from certain flowers, though pure honey, may give a right-handed rotation with a large angle because of a large amount of dextrose and little levulose? It occurs to me that these two uncertain factors, incomplete digestion and the possible variation in nectar, make determi- nation by the analyst either by use of the polariscope or chemi- cal reagents a matter of doubt. I speak with more confidence, as our National Chemist pronounced several specimens of OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 173 what I feel sure were pure honey, to be probably adulterated. Ithink that now he has perfected his methods so that such mistakes would rarely occur. While nearly or quite half of the nectar of flowers is cane- sugar, there is very little of such sugar in honey. While from one to three percent is most common it not infrequently runs to five or six percent, and occasionally to twelve or sixteen per- cent. Quite likely in this last case, imperfect digestion was the cause. The nectar was not long enough in the stomach to be changed ; or else for some reason there was too little of the digestive ferment present. Of course, twelve to fifteen percent of sucrose would almost surely rotate the plane to the right. There is a very interesting field for study here. What flowers yield nectar so rich in cane-sugar that even the honey is rich in the same element? Honey often contains, we are told, as much as four percent of dextrine. This, of course, tends to make it rotate the ray to the right, and further complicates the matter. Again, it is easy to see that in case flowers secrete nectar in large quantities the bees would load quickly, and so proportionately less saliva would be mixed with it, and digestion would be less thorough. We see now why drones and queens need salivary glands to yield the ferment to digest honey. Often the worker-bees do not thoroughly digest it. We see, too, why honey is such an excellent food. We have to digest all our cane-sugar. The honey we eat has been largely digested for us. Albuminoids—evidently from the pollen—vary from five to seventy-five hundredths of one percent. These vary largely according to the flowers. It is quite likely that in case of bloom like basswood where the honey comes very rapidly— fifteen pounds per day sometimes for each colony—the stomach- mouth can not remove all the pollen. Here is an opportunity for close observation. If we know we have honey that was vathered very rapidly, we should have a test made for albumi- nous material to see if its quantity increases with the rapidity with which the honey is gathered. While there may be quite an amount of this pollen in honey, usually there will be but little. Besides the above substances, there is a little mineral mat- 174 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; ter—fifteen hundredths of one percent—which I suppose to be mainly malate of lime; a little of the essential oils which pos- sibly give the characteristic flavor of the different kinds of honey, and more or less coloring matter, more in buckwheat honey, less in basswood. Thereis also a little acid—formic acid—which probabiy aids to digest the nectar, and possibly with the saliva, may, like the acid gastric juice of our own stomachs, resist putrefaction, or any kind of fermentation. It has been urged that this is added to the honey by the bees dropping poison from the sting. I muchdoubt thistheory. It is more reasonable, however, than the absurd view that the bee uses its sting to polish its cells. If the poison-glands can secrete formic acid, why can not the glands of the stomach? Analogy, no less than common sense, favors this view. The acid of honey is often recognizable to the taste, as every lover of honey knows. The acid isalso shown by use of blue litmus. The specific gravity varies greatly of course, as we should expect from the great variation in the amount of water. I have found very thick honey to have a specific gravity of 1.40 to150. The fact that honey is digested nectar or sucrose, shows that in eating honey our food is partially digested for us, the cane-sugar is changed to a sugar that can be readily absorbed and assimilated. I have fed bees pure cane-sugar, and, when stored, the late Prof. R. F. Kedzie found that nearly all of this sugar was transformed in much the same way that the nectar is changed which is taken from the flowers. It is probable that the large compound racemose glands in the head and thorax of the bees (Fig. 59, dag, lg, and Fig. 61) secrete an abundant ferment which hastens these transfor- mations which the sugars undergo while in the honey-stomach of the bee. I once fed several pounds of cane-sugar syrup at night to the bees. I extracted some of this the next morning, and more after it was capped. Bothsamples were analyzed by three able chemists—Profs. Kedzie, Scovell, and Wiley—and the sample from the capped honey was found to be much bet- ter digested. This shows that the digestion continues in the comb. Much of the water escapes after the honey is stored. The method of collecting honey has already been described. OR, MANUAL OF THER APIARY. 175 The principles of lapping and suction are both involved in the operation. When the stomach is full the bee repairs to the hive and regurgitates its precious load, either giving it to the bees or storing itin the cells. This honey remains for some time uncapped that it may ripen, in which process the water is partially evaporated; and the honey rendered thicker. If the honey remains uncapped, or is removed from the cells, it will generally granulate, if the temperature be reduced below 70 degrees. Like many other substances, most honey, if heated and sealed while hot, will not crystallize till it is unsealed. In case of granulation the sucrose and glucose crystallize in the mellose. Some honey, as that from the South, and some from California, seems to remain liquid indefinitely. Some kinds of our own honey crystallize much more readily than others. I have frequently observed that thick, ripe honey granulates more slowly than thin honey. The only sure (?) test of the purity of honey, if there be any, is that of the polariscope. This, even if decisive, is not practical except in the hands of the scientist. The most practical test is that of granulation, though this is not wholly reliable. Granulated honey is almost certainly pure. Occasionally genuine honey, and of superior excellence, refuses, even in a zero atmosphere, to crystallize. When there are no flowers, or when the flowers yield no sweets, the bees, ever desirous to-add to their stores, frequently essay to rob other colonies, and often visit the refuse of cider- mills, or suck up the oozing sweets of various plant or bark lice, thus adding, may be, unwholesome food to their usually delicious and refined stores. It is a curious fact that the queen never lays her maximum number of eggs except when storing is going on. In fact, in the interims of honey-gathering, egg- laying not infrequently ceases altogether. The queen seems discreet, gauging the size of her family by the probable means of support. Oritis quite possible that the workers control affairs by withholding the chyle, and thus the queen stops per- force. Syrian bees are much more likely to continue brood- rearing when no honey is being collected than are either Ger- man or Italian bees. Again, in times of extraordinary yields of honey the stor- 176 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; ing is very rapid, and the hive becomes so filled that the queen is unable to lay her full quota of eggs; in fact, I have seen the brood very much reduced in this way, which, of course, greatly depletes the colony. ‘This might be called ruinous prosperity. The natural use of the honey is to furnish, in part, the drones and imago worker-bees with food, and also to supply, in part at least, the queen, especially when she is not laying. WAX. The product of the bees second in importance is wax. The older scientists thought this was a product formed from pollen. Girard says it was discovered by a peasant of Lusace. Lang- stroth states that Herman C. Hornbostel discovered the true source of wax in 1745. Thorley in 1774, and Wildman in 1778, understood the true source of wax. This is a solid, unctuous substance, and is, as shown by its chemical composition, a fat- like material, though not, as some authors assert, the fat of bees. This is lighter than water, as its specific gravity is .965. The melting point is never less than 144 degrees F. Thus, it is easy to detect adulteration, as mineral wax, both paraffine and ceresin, have a less specific gravity. Paraffine also hasa much lower melting point. It is impossible to adulterate wax with these mineral products for use as foundation. They so destroy the ductility and tenacity that the combs are almost sure to break down. Ceresin might be used, but it is distaste- ful to the bees, and foundation made from wax in which ceresin is mixed would have novalue. Only pure beeswax is used in manufacturing foundation in the United States. I have this on the authority of Mr. A. I. Root, whose dictum in such matters is conclusive. As already observed, wax is a secretion from the glands just within the wax-plates, and is formed in scales, the shape of an irregular pentagon (Fig. 72, w) underneath the abdomen. These scales are light-colored, very thin and. fragile, and are secreted by the wax-gland as a liquid, which passes through the wax-plate by osmosis, and solidifies as thin wax-scales on the outside of the plates opposite the glands. Neighbour speaks of wax oozing through pores from the stomach. This is not the case, but, like the synovial fluid about our own OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 177 joints, it is formed by the secreting membrane, and does not pass through holes, as water througha sieve. There are, as already stated, four of these wax-pockets on each side (Fig. 72), and thus there may be eight wax-scales on a bee ata time. This wax can be secreted by the bees when fed on pure sugar, as shown by Huber, whose experiment I have verified. I removed all honey and comb froma strong colony, left the bees for twenty-four hours to digest all food which might be in their stomachs, and then fed pure sugar, which was better than honey, as Prof. R. F. Kedzie has shown by analysis that not only filtered honey, but even the nectar which he collected right from the flowers themselves, contains nitrogen. The bees commenced at once to build comb, and continued for sev- eral days, so long as I kept them confined. This is as we should suppose; sugar contains hydrogen and oxygen in pro- portion to form water, while the third element, carbon, is in the same, or about the same, proportion as the oxygen. Now, the fats usually contain little oxygen and a good deal of car- bon and hydrogen. Thus the sugar, by losing some of its oxygen, would contain the requisite elements for fat. It was found true in the days of slavery in the South that the negroes of Louisiana, during the gathering of the cane, would become very fat. They ate much sugar; they gained much fat. Now, wax is a fat-like substance, not that it is the animal fat of bees, as often asserted—in fact, it contains much less hydro- gen, as will be seen by the following formula from Hess: ORY Bet i.5 iG cuerades wlageeeiaa See taecnainie: eine W ba same IAS 7.50 CAE DOM ie fecetodiacia ticivactes dccecd fologeses acatssueis pbsde iisonnsaiajeundounainrass 79.30 FAY Arogett isisisins sicicnes ace eeasaureee ne ana ce ee eens sees 13.20 —but itis a special secretion fora special purpose, and from its composition we should conclude that it might be secreted from a purely saccharine diet, and experiment confirms the conclusion. Dr. Planta has found that there is a trace of nitrogen in wax-scales, a little less than .6 of one percent, while he findsin newly made comb, nearly .9 of one percent. It has been found that bees require about twenty pounds of honey to secrete one of wax. The experiments of Mr. P. L. Viallon show this estimate of Huber to betoo great. Berlepsch says sixteen to nineteen pounds when fed on sugar without 178 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE}; pollen, and ten pounds when fed both. My own experiments would sustain Huber’s statement. In these experiments the bees are confined, and so the conclusions are to be received with caution. We can not know how much the results are changed by the abnormal condition in which the bees are placed. For a time nitrogenous food is not necessary to the secre- tion of wax. Probably the small amount of nitrogen in the scales and in the saliva may be furnished by the blood. This, of course, could not continue long; indeed, the general nutri- tion would be interfered with, and ill health can never do maximum work. It is asserted that to secrete wax, bees need to hang in compact clusters or festoons in absolute repose. Such quiet would certainly seem conducive to most active secretion. The food could not go to form wax, and at the same time supply the waste of tissue which ever follows upon muscular activity. The cow, put to hard toil, could not give so much milk. But I find, upon examination, that the bees, even the oldest ones, while gathering in the honey season, yield up the wax-scales the same as those within the hive. During the active storing of the past season, especially when comb-building was in rapid progress, I found that nearly every bee taken from the flowers contained the wax-scales of varying sizes in the wax- pockets. By the activity of the bees, these are not infre- quently loosened from their position and fall to the bottom of the hive, sometimes in astonishing quantities. This explains why wax is often mentioned as an elementof honey. Its pres- ence, however, in honey is wholly accidental. It is probable that wax-secretion is not forced upon the bees, but only takes place as required. So the bees, unless wax is demanded, may perform other duties. When we fill the sections and brood- chamber wholly with foundation, it is often difficult to find any bees bearing wax-scales. In such cases I have often looked long, but in vain, to find such scales in situ to show to my students. A newly-hived colony, with no combs or foun- dation, will show these wax-scales on nearly every bee. Whether this secretion is a matter of the bee’s will, or whether it is excited by the surrounding conditions without any OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 179 thought, are questions yet to be settled. No comb necessitates quiet. With us and all other higher animals, quiet and heavy food-taking favors fat deposits. May not the same in bees conduce to wax-production ? These wax-scales are loosened by the wax-jaws of the pos- terior legs, carried to their anterior claws, which in turn bear them to the mouth, where they are mixed with saliva probably from Wolff’s glands (Fig. 60), or mixed saliva. After the proper kneading by the jaws, these wax-scales are fashioned into that wonderful and exquisite structure, the comb. In this transformation to comb, the wax may become colored. This is due to aslight admixture of pollen or old wax. Itis almost sure to be colored if the new comb is formed adjacent to old, dark-colored comb. In such cases chippings from the old soiled comb are used. Honey-comb is wonderfully delicate, the base of a new cell being, according to Prof. C. P. Gillette, in worker-comb, be- tween .0032 and .0064 of an inch, and the drone between .0048 and .008. The walls are even thinner, varying, he says, from -0018 to .0028 of an inch. ‘Thecells are so formed as to com- bine the greatest strength and maximum capacity with the least expense of material. It need hardly be said that queen- cells are much thicker, and contain, as before stated, much that is not wax. In the arch-like pits in queen-cells, we farther see how strength is conserved and material economized. Honey-comb has been an object of admiration since the earliest time. Some claim that the form is a matter of neces- sity—the result of pressure or reciprocal resistance and not of bee-skill. The fact that the hexagonal form is sometimes assumed just as the cell is started, when pressure or resistance could not aid, has led me to doubt this view; especially as wasps form their paper nests of soft pulp, and the hexagonal cells extend to the edge, where no pressure or resistance could affect the form of the cells. Yet I am notcertain that the mutual resistance of the cells, as they are fashioned from the soft wax, may not determine the form. Mullenhoff seems to have proved that mutual resistance of the cells causes the hexagonal form. The bees certainly carve out the triangular pyramid at the base. They would need to be no better geome- 180 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; tricians to form the hexagonal cells. The assertion that the cells of honey-comb are absolutely uniform and perfect is untrue, as a little inspection will convince any one. The late Prof. J. Wyman demonstrated that an exact hexagonal cell does not exist. He alsoshowed that the size varies, so that in a distance of ten worker-cells there may bea variation of one cell in diameter, and this in natural, not distorted, cells. Any one who doubts can easily prove, by a little careful examina- tion, that Prof. Wyman was correct. This variation of one- fifth of an inch in ten cells is extreme, but variation of one- Fic 77. Irregular Cells, (modified) from Cowan. tenth of aninchis common. The sides, as also the angles, are notconstant. ‘The rhombic faces forming the bases of the cells alsovary. The idea which has come down from the past that mathematics and measurement exactly, agreed upon the angles of the rhombs, that the two opposite obtuse angles were each 109° 28’ 16’”’ and the acute 70° 31’ and 44’ is without foun- dation infact. Mr. Cowan figures (Fig. 77) triangular, quad- rangular, and even cells with seven sides. Of course, such deformity is very rare. OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 181 The bees change from worker (Fig. 78, c) to drone cells (Fig. 78, a), which are one-fifth larger, and vice versa, not by any system (Fig. 78, 4), but simply by enlarging or contract- ing. It usually takes about four rows to complete the transfor- Fic, 78. Lhombs, Pyramidal Bases and cross-sections of cells. —ITilustrated, Honey-Comb.— after Duncan. a Drone-cells. ¢ Worker-cells. bd Deformed cells. dd Queen-cells. mation, though the number of deformed cells varies from two, very rarely one, to eight. The perfect drone-cells may be, often are, contiguous to perfect worker-cells, the irregular cells being used to fill out the necessary irregularities. An English 182. THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; writer criticises Langstroth’s representation of these irregular cells, and adds that the angles can never be less than 100 degrees. This is far from the truth, as I have found many cells where an angle was considerably less than this. Mr. Cowan, in his excellent ‘‘ Honey-Bee,’’ describes and figures cells where the angle is even acute. The structure of each cell is quite complex, yet full of interest. The base is a triangular pyramid (Fig. 78, ¢), whose three faces are rhombs (Mr. Cowan has found and photo- graphed cells with four faces), and whose apex forms the very center of the floor of the cell. From the six free or non- adjacent edges of the three rhombs extend the lateral walls or faces of the cell. The apex of this basal pyramid is a point where the contiguous faces of the three cells on the opposite side meet, and form the angles of the bases of three cells on the opposite side of the comb. ‘Thus the base of each cell forms one-third of the base of three opposite cells. One side thus braces the other, and adds much to the strength of the comb. Each cell, then, is in the form of a hexagonal prism, terminating in a flattened triangular pyramid. The bees usually build several combs at once, and carry forward several cells on each side of each comb, constantly adding to the number, by additions to the edge. The bees, in constructing comb, make the base or so-called mid-rib, the “‘fish-bone ’’ in honey where foundation is used, thick at first, and thin this as they add to the cells in lengthening them. Prof. C. P. Gillette demonstrated this by coloring foundation black. The color reached nearly tothe end of the cell, and extended an inch below the foundation. Thus we understand why bees take so kindly to foundation. To work this out is not contrary to their instincts, and gives them a lift. Huber first observed the process of comb-building, noticing the bees abstract the wax-scales, carry them to the mouth, add the frothy saliva, and then knead and draw out the yellow ribbons which were fastened to the top of the hive, or added to the comb already commenced. The diameter of the worker-cells (Fig. 78, c) averages little more than one-fifth of an inch—Reaumur says two and three- fifths lines, or twelfths of an inch—while the drone-cells (Fig. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 183 78, a) area little more than one-fourth of an inch, or, according to Reaumur, three and one-third lines. But this distinguished author was quite wrong when he said: ‘‘ These are the in- variable dimensions of all cells that ever were or ever will be made.’’ A recent English author, after stating the diameter of cells, adds: ‘The statement many times made that twenty-five and sixteen of these, respectively, cover a square inch, is erroneous, as they are not square.’’ He says there are 28 13-15 and 18 178-375. I find the worker-cells per square inch vary from 25 to 29, and the drone-cells from 16 to 19 per square inch. The drone-cells, I think, vary more in size than do the worker-cells. The depth of the worker-cells is a little less than half aninch; the drone-cells are slightly extended, so as to be a little more than half an inch deep. Thus worker- comb is seven-eighths and drone-comb one and one-fourth inches thick. This depth, even of brood-cells, varies, so we can not give exact figures. Thecellsare often drawn out so as to be an inch long, when used solely as honey receptacles. Such cells are often very irregular at the end, and sometimes two are joined. The number of cells in a pound of comb will vary much, of course, as the thickness of the comb is not uni- form. This number will vary from thirty to fifty thousand. In capping the honey the bees commence at the outside of each cell and finish at the center. The capping of the brood- cells is white and convex. The capping of honey-cells is made thicker by black bees than by the other races, and so their comb honey is more beautiful. Another reason for the whiter color comes from a small air-chamber just beneath the capping. The inner surface of the capping is, therefore, usually free from honey. This chamberis usually a little larger in the honey-comb of black bees. The cappings are strengthened by tiny braces of wax, which, as we should expect, are most pronounced in drone-comb. The strength of comb is something marvelous. I have known a frame of comb honey eleven inches square to weigh eleven pounds, and yet to be unsupported at the bottom, and for not more than one-third of the distance from the top on the sides, and yet it held securely. The danger in cold weather, from breaking, is greater,as then the comb is very brittle. 184 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; Prof. Gillette has found that comb one inch thick will weigh only from one-twentieth to one twenty-fifth the weight of the honey which it may hold. ‘The character of the cells, as to size, that is, whether they are drone or worker, seems to be determined by the relative abundance of bees and honey. If the bees are abundant and honey needed, or if there is no queen to lay eggs, drone-comb (Fig. 78, a) is invariably built, while if there are few bees, and of course little honey needed, then worker-comb (Fig. 78, c) is Fic. 79. Foney-Comb Coral.—Original. almost invariably formed. It is also a curious fact that if the queen keeps along with the comb-builders in the brood-cham- ber, then no drone-comb is built; but let her fail to keep cells occupied, and drone-comb is at once formed. It would seem that the workers reasoned thus: We are going to have comb for storing, for such we better fashion the large celled or drone-comb. All comb, when first formed, is clear and translucent. The fact that it is often dark and opaque implies that it has been long used as brood-comb, and the opacity is due to the innu- merable thin glue-like cocoons which line the cells. This may OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 185 be separated by dissolving the wax; which may be done by putting it in boiling alcohol, or, better still, by use of the solar wax-extractor. Such comb need not be discarded, for if com- posed of worker-cells it is still very valuable for breeding pur- poses, and should not be destroyed till the cells are too small for long service, which will not occur till after many years of use. The function, then, of the wax, is to make comb and Fic. 80. Honey-Comb Coral,—Original, caps for the honey-cells, and, combined with pollen, to form queen-cells (Fig. 78, d) and caps for the brood-cells. A very common fossil found in many parts of the Eastern and Northern United States is, from its appearance, often called petrified honey-comb. We have many such specimens in our museum. In some cases the cells are hardly larger than a pin-head; in others a quarter of an inch in diameter. These (Figs. 79, 80) are not fossil honey-comb as many are led to believe, though the resemblance is so striking that no won- 186 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; der the public generally are deceived. These specimens are fossil coral, which the paleontologist places in the genus Favosites; favosus being a common species in the Northern United States. They are very abundantin the lime rockin northern Michigan, and are very properly denominated honey- combcoral. The animals of which these were once the skele- tons, so to speak, are not insects at all, though often called so by men of considerable information. The species of the genus Favosites first appeared in the Upper Silurian rocks, culminated in the Devonian, and dis- appeared in the early Carboniferous. No insects appeared till the Devonian age, and no Hymenoptera—bees, wasps, etc.— till after the Carboniferous. So the old-time Favositid reared its limestone columns and helped to build islands and conti- nents untold ages—millions upon millions of years—before any flower bloomed, or any bee sipped the precious nectar. In some specimens of this honey-comb coral (Fig. 80) there are to be seen banks of cells, much resembiing the paper-nests of some of our wasps. This might be called wasp-comb coral, except that both styles were wrought by the self-same animals. POLLEN OR BEE-BREAD. An ancient Greek author states that in Hymettus the bees tied little pebbles to their legs to hold them down. This fan- ciful conjecture probably arose from seeing the pollen-balls on the bees’ legs. Even such scientists as Reaumur, Bonnet, Swammerdam, and many apiarists of the last century, thought they saw in these pollen-balls the sourceof wax. But Huber, John Hunter, Duchet, Wildman, and others already referred to, noticed the presence and function of the wax-scales already described, and were aware that the pollen served a different purpose. This substance, like nectar, is not secreted nor manufac- tured by the bees, only collected. The pollen-grains form the male elementin plants. They are in plants what the sperma- tozoa or sperm-cells are in animals; and as the sperm-cells are much more numerous than theeggs or germ-cells, so pollen- grains are far more numerousin plants than are the ovules or OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY, 187 seeds, In Chinese wistaria, Wistaria sinensis, there are, says Goodale, about 7,000 pollen-grains to each ovule. The color of pollen is usually yellow; but we often find it orange, reddish, nearly white, andin several Giliasin California it is bright blue. Pollen-grains are really single cells, and have two coats; the outer is the extine, which may be smooth, variously soulptured, or even thickly set with spines (Fig. 81). These spines, as also the color, often enable us to tell the species of plant from which the pollen came. Usually the extine is per- Fic. 81, Pollen-Grains, from A. I. Root Co. forated, though the inner wall—intine—is not. These perfora- tions are also definite in number within the species. These holes give opportunity for the pollen-tubes (Fig. 252, 7) to push out after the pollen-grain reaches the stigma of the flower. Where there are no perforations of the extine, the wall breaks. In some cases like orchids, pollen-grains are held together by an adhesive substance. In our milkweeds we notice a similar grouping of pollen-grains (Fig. 227) which often are very dis- turbing to bees and other insects. The composition of pollen, says Goodale, is protoplasmic 188 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE} matter, granular food materials, such as starch and oil and dissolved food matters, sugar and dextrine. Dr. A. de Planta gives the following analysis of pollen of the hazel (B. B. Journal, Vol. XIV, p. 269). He finds proto- plasm, oils and starch—the important food elements. Before drying he found : Water ESD seri cotceiy iets’ ols 6i8 Aiba lowe ado esos ATE Oe BabonT Ga After drying thoroughly he found : Nitrogenous Matter Non-nitrogenous...... ...... sae a AIS Hy cayse-on ahr. ie ealelselatns, wee here ea ine wnat a He found no reducing sugar, but did find 14.70 percent of cane-sugar. As will be seen, pollen, like our grains, is rich in the albuminoids. Like our grains, or even different specimens of the same grain, the composition of pollen will doubtless vary to quite an extent. As we note that pollen contains besides an ash, albuminoids, sugar, starch, and oils, we understand its excellence as a food; it contains within itself all the impor- tant food elements. The bees usually obtain it from the stamens of flowers; but if they gain access to flour when there is no bloom, they will take this in lieu of pollen, in which case the former term used above becomes a misnomer, though usually the bee-bread consists wholly of pollen. I have also known bees to gather extensively for bee-bread from the com- mon raspberry rust. Very likely the spores of others of these fungi or low vegetables help to supply this nutritious sub- stance. Occasionally there is a drouth of bee-bread alike in hive and flowers, then bees will seek this kind of food in meal or flour box or bin. Hence, the wisdom of feeding rye-flour which the bees will readily take if it is needed. Flour may be added to candy and fed to bees. As already intimated, the pollen is conveyed in the pollen- baskets (Fig. 70) of the posterior legs, to which it is conveyed by the other legs, as already described, page 154, and com- pressed into little oval masses. The motionsin this convey- ance are exceedingly rapid, and are largely performed while OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 189 the bee ison the wing. The bees not infrequently come to the hives not only with replete pollen-baskets, but with their whole under-surface thoroughly dusted. Dissection will also show that the same bee may have her sucking stomach dis- tended with honey, though this is rare. Thus the bees make the most of their opportunities. It isa curious fact, noticed even by Aristotle, that the bees, during any trip, almost always gather only a single kind of pollen, or gather only from one species of bloom. Hence, while different bees may have different colors of pollen, the pellets of bee-bread on any single bee will be uniform in color throughout. It is possible that the material is more easily collected and compacted when homogeneous. It seems more probable that they prefer the pollen of certain plants, and work on such species so long as they yield the desired food, though it may be a matter of sim- ple convenience. From this fact we see why bees cause no intercrossing of species of plants; they only intermix the pollen of different plants of the same species. The pollen is usually deposited in the small or worker cells, and is unloaded bya scraping motion of the posterior legs, the pollen-baskets being first lowered into the cells. The bee thus freed, leaves the wheat-like masses to be packed by other bees, which is packed by pushing with the head. The cells, which may or may not have the samecolor of pollen throughout, are never filled quite to the top, and not infre- quently the same cell may contain both pollen and honey. .. Such a condition is easily ascertained by holding the comb between the eye andthe sun. Ifthereis no pollen it will be wholly translucent ; otherwise there will be opaque patches. A little experience will make this determination easy, even if the comb is old. Combs in small sections, especially if sep- arators are used, are not likely to receive pollen or be used for breeding. It is often stated that queenless colonies gather no pollen, but itis not true, though they gather less than they otherwise would. It is probable that pollen, at least when honey is added, contains all the essential elements of animal food. It certainly contains the very important principle which is not found in pure nectar or honey—nitrogenous material. I do not think the bee-moth larva will destroy 190 THE BEH-KEEPER’S GUIDE; combs that are entirely destitute of pollen, surely not unless they have been long used as brood-combs. The intruder must have proteid food. The function of bee-bread is to furnish albuminous food to all the bees, adults no less than larve. As already stated, brood-rearing is impossible without it. And though it is cer- tainly not essential to the nourishment of the adult bees when in repose, it still may be so, and unquestionably is, in time of activelabor. This point is clearly proved from the fact that pollen-husks are almost always found in the intestines of bees. We may say it feeds the tissues of the imago bees, and is necessary that the workers may form the food for the queen, drones and larve. Schonfeld thinks the bees must have it in winter, and in case no bee-bread is in the combs, he thinks the bees scrape it from thecells and old combs. I believe bees often winter better when there is no pollen in the hive. PROPOLIS OR BEE-GLUE. This substance, also called bee-glue, is collected as the bees collect pollen, and is not made or secreted. It is the pro- duct of various resinous buds,and may be seen to glisten on the opening buds of the hickory and horse-chestnut, where it frequently serves the entomologist by capturing small insects. From such sources, from the oozing gum of various trees, from varnished furniture, and from old propolis about unused hives that have previously seen service, do the bees secure their glue. Probably the gathering of bees about coffins to collect the gluefrom the varnish, led to the custom of rap- ping on the hives to inform the bees, in case of a death in the family, that they might join as mourners. This custom still prevails, as I understand, in some parts of the South. Propolis has great adhesive force, and though soft and pliable when warm becomes very hard and unyielding when cold. The use of bee-glue is to cement the combs to their sup- ports, to fill up allrough places inside the hive, to seal up all crevices except the place of exit, which the bees often contract by aidof propolis, and even to cover any foreign substance that can not be removed. Intruding snails have thus been imprisoned inside the hive. Reaumur found a snail thus in- cased; Maraldi a slug similarly entombed ; while I have myself OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 191 observed a Bombus, which had been stripped by the bees of wings, hair, etc.,in their vain attempts at removal, also en- cased in this unique style of a sarcophagus, fashioned by the bees. Alcohol, benzine, gasoline, ether, and chloroform are all ready solvents of bee-glue, and will quickly remove it from the hands, clothing, etc. Boiling in water with concentrated lye will remove propolis completely. Even steam and hot water used as a spray have been found to do the same. PARTIAL BIBLIOGRAPHY. For very full lists of books, etc., see Packard’s Text-Book of Entomology. Alley, Henry—Thirty Years Among the Bees, 1880, and Queen- Rearing, 1883. Adair, D. L.—Annals of Bee-Keeping, 1872. Amans, Dr.—Essai sur le vol des Insectes, 1883. Ballantine, Rev Wm.—Bee-Culture, 1884. ‘* Bee-Master,’”’—The Times Bee-Keeping, 1864. Benton, Frank—The Honey-Bee, 1899. Berger, E.—Untersuchungen uber den Bau des Gehirnes und der Retina der Arthropoden, 1873. Berlepsch, A. Baron von—Die Biene und ihre Zucht, 1873. Bevan, Dr. E.—The Honey-Bee, 1838. Blanchard, E.—Recherches anatomique sur le systeme nerveux les Insectes, 1846. . De la circulation dans les Insectes, 1848. Du grand sympathique chez les Animaux articules, 1858. Bonnet, C.—Cjuvres d@’histoire naturelle, 1779-1783. Bonnier, G.—Les Nectaires, 1879. Bordas, L.—Glandes salivaries des Apides, Apis mellifica, (Comptes rendus Acad. Sci. Paris,) 1894. Appareil glandu- laire des Hymenopteres (Ann. Soc Nat. Zool. Paris,) 1894. Brandt, E.—Comparative Anatomy of the Nerve System of Insects (in Russian,) 1878. Briant, T. J.—Notes on the Antenne of the Honey-Bee (Jour. Linn. Soc.,) 1883. On the Anatomy and Functions of the Tongue of the Honey-Bee (Jour. Linn. Soc.,) 1884. Antennz of Honey-Bee (Jour. Linn. Soc.,) 1885. British Bee Journal—1873 to 1889. Present Editor, T. W. Cowan, F.L.S., etc. Brougham, Lord H.—Observations, Demonstrations, and Ex- periments upon the Structure of the Cells of Bees (Natural Theology,) 1856. Buchner, L,.—Mind in Animals, 1880. Burmeister, H.—Handbuch der Entomologie, 1832. 192 THE BEEK-KHEPER’S GUIDE; Butschli, O.—Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Biene, 1870. Cameron, P.—On Parthenogenesis in the Hymenoptera (Trans. Nat. Hist. Soc. of Glasgow,) 1888. Chambers, V. T.—On the Tongue of some Hymenoptera (Jor. Nat. Hist. Soc. Cincin.,) 1874. Cheshire—Bees and Bee-Keeping, two volumes, 1886. Claparede, E.—Morphologie des,zusammengesetzten Anges bei den Arthropoden (Zeit. fur Wiss. Zool. ») 1860. Clute, Dr. O.—Blessed Bees, 1878. Collin, Abbe—Guide du proprietaire d’Abeilles, 1878. Comstock, H. J.—Manual for the Study of Insects, 1895. Re- cent and authoritative. Cowan, T. W.—The Honey-Bee, 1890. Very accurate and full. Bee-Keeper’s Guide Book, 1881. Dadant, Chas. and Son—Langstroth on the Honey-Bee, 1899, Dahl, F.—Archiv. £. Naturg., 1884, pp. 146-193. Darwin, C.—Origin of Species, 1859, 1872, 1878. Debeauvoys, M.—L’Apiculteur, 1853. Dewitz, H.—Vergleichende Untersuchungen uber Bau und Ent- wickelung des Stachels der Honigbiene, 1874. Doolittle, G. M.—Scientific Queen-Rearing, 1889. Donhoff, Dr.—Bienenzeitung, 1851-1854. Dufour, Leon—Memo. pres. par divers savants a l’Acad. des Sci. de 1’Inst. de France. Tome VII. Dujardin, F.—Memoire sur le systeme nerveux des Insectes, 1851. Observations sur les Abeilles, 1852. Dumas et Milne Edwards—Sur la production de la cire des Abeilles, 1843-1844, Duthiers, L.—Recherches sur Parmure genitale des Insectes (Ann des Scien. Nat.,) 1848-1852. Dzierzon, Dr.—Bienenzeitung, 1845-1854. ‘Theorie und Praxis des neuen Bienenfreundes, 1849-1852. Rational Bee-Keeping. English translation by Dieck and Stutterd, 1882. Erichson—De fabrica et usu antennarum in Insectis, 1847. Exner, S.—Ueber das Sehen von Bewegungen und die Theorie des zusammengesetzten Auges, 1875. Die Frage der Functionsweise der Facettenaugen (Biol. Centralblatt,) 1880, 1882. Figuier, L.—The Insect World, translated by P. Martin Dun- can, 1872. Fischer, G.—Bienenzeitung, 1871. Geddes, Prof. Patrick and J. A. Thomson—The Evolution of Sex, 1889. Girard, M.—Sur la chaleur libre degagee par les animaux in- vertebres et specialement les Insectes, 1869. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 193 Traite elementaire d’Entomologie, 1873. Les Abeilles, organes et fonctions, 1878. Girdwoyn, M.—Anatomie et physiologie de l’Abeille, 1876. Gottsche, C. M.—Beitrag zur Anat. und Physiol. des Auges der Fliegen, etc. (Mull. Arch. fur Anat.,) 1852, Graber, Dr. V.—Ueber die Blutkorperchen der Insekten, 1871. Ueber den propulsatorischen Apparat der Insekten, 1872. Verlaufiger Bericht uber den propulsatorischen Appa- rat der Insekten, 1872. a neue otocystenartige Sinnesorgane der Insekten, 1878. ; Die Chordotonalen Sinnesorgane und das Gehor der In- sekten (Arch. fur. Mic. Anat.,) 1882. Grassi, Dr. B.—Intorno allo sviluppo delle Api nell’ uovo, 1883, 1884, 1886. Grenacher, H.—Untersuchungen uber das Sehorgan der Arth- ropoden, 1879. Abhandlungen zur vergleichenden Anatomie des Auges, 1886. Grimshaw, R. A. H.—Heredity in Bees (British Bee Journal,) 1889, Gundelach, F. W.—Die Naturgeschichte der Honigbiene, 1842. Hauser, G.—Physiologische und histologische Untersuchungen uber das Geruchsorgan der Insekten, 1880. Haviland, J. D.—The Social Instincts of Bees, their Origin and Natural Selection, 1882. Heddon, James—Success in Bee-Culture, 1886. Helmholz—Sensations of Tone. Hicks, Dr. J. Braxton—On a new structure in the Antenne of Insects (Jour. Linn. Soc.,) 1857. On certain Sensory Organs in Insects, hitherto unde- scribed, 1860. : The Honey-Bee (Samuelson and Hicks,) 1860. Hickson, Dr. S. J.—The Eye and Optic Tract of Insects (Quart. Jour. Mic. Science,) 1885. Hopkins, Isaac—Australasian Bee-Manual, 1886. Huber, F.—Nouvelles observations sur les Abeilles, 1814, (and other editions.) Hunter, J.—On Bees (Philosophical Trans.,) 1792. Manual of Bee-Keeping, 18— Hutchinson, W. Z.—Advanced Bee-Culture, 1883. Comb Honey, 1897. . Hyatt, J. D.—The Structure of the Tongue of the Honey-Bee (Amer. Quart. Mic Jour.,) 1878, p. 287. The Sting of the Honey-Bee (ibid,) 1878, p. 3. The Sting of the Honey-Bee (Pop. Sc. Mon.,) 1879. Janscha, I. A.—Hinterlassene vollstandige Lehre von der Bien- enzucht, 1775. 194 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; John, Dr. Martin—Ein neu Bienen-Buchel, 1691. Jurine, Mademoiselle—Huber’s Nouvelles observations sur les Abeilles, 1792-1814. King, H.—Bee-Keepers’ Text-Book, 1883. Kirby, W.—Monographia Apum Angliae, 1802. Kirby and Spence—Introduction to Entomology. Klein, Dr. E.—Handbook for the Physiological Laboratory, 1873. Elements of Histology, 1884. Kowalevsky—Embryologische Studien an Wurmern und Arth- ropoden, 1871. Kraepelin, Dr. K.—Phys. und Hist. uber die Geruchsorgane der Insekten (Zeit. f. Wiss. Zool.,) 1880. Ueber die Mundwerkzeuge der saugenden Insekten (zbzd,) 1882. Ueber die Geruchsorgane der Gliederthiere, 1883. Krancher, Dr. O.—Der Bau der Stigmen bei der Insekten, 1881. Die dreierlei Bienenwesen, 1884. Lacordaire—Iutroduction a l’Entomologie, 1861. Landois, Dr. H.—Beitrage zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Schmetterlingsflugels in der Raupe und Puppe, 1871. Die ton und Stimmapparate der Insekten, 1867. Langstroth, L. L.—The Honey-Bee, 1859-1873. Latreille, P. A.—Eclaircissemens relatifs a l’opinion de M. Huber fils, sur l’origine et Vissue exterieure de la Cire (Acad. Roy. des Sciences,) 1821. Cours d’entomulogie, 1831. Leeuwenhoek, A.—Select works, translated by H. Hoole. Lefebvre, A.—Note sur le sentiment olfactif des Insectes (Ann. Soc. entom. de France,) 1838. Leuckart, Dr.—Zur Kentniss des Generationswechsels und der Parthenogenesis bei der Insekten, 1858. Leuckart, R.—Ueber Metamorphose, ungeschlechtliche Ver- mehrung, Generationswechsel, 1851. Leydig, F.—Das Auge der Gliederthiere, 1864. Zur Anatomie der Insekten (Mull. Archiv. f. Anat.,) 1859. Lhuilier, S. A. J.—Memoire sur le minimum de cire des alveoles des Abeilles, et en particulier sur un minimum minimorum relatif a cette matiere, 1781. Lowe, J.—Trans. Ent. Soc. Vol. V. pp. 547-560, 1867. Lowne, B. T.—On the Simple and Compound Eyes of Insects (Phil. Trans.,) 1879. On the Compound Vision and the Morphol. of the Eye in Insects (Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond.,) 1884. Lubbock, Sir J.—Ants, Bees and Wasps, 1882. The Senses, Instincts and Intelligence of Animals, 1889. Lucas, I. G.—Entwurf eines wissenschaftlichen Systems fur- Bienenzucht, 1808. Lucas, M. H.—Cas de cyclopie observe chez un insecte Hymen- optere (Apis mellifica,) 1868. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 195 Lyonet, Pieter—Traite anatomique de la chenille qui ronge Le bois de saule, etc., 1762. , Macloskie, G.—The Endocranium and Maxillary Suspensorium of the Bee (Amer. Natural, pp. 567-573,) 1884. Maraldi, G. F.—Observations sur les Abeilles (Mem. Acad. des Sciences,) 1712. Marey, E. J.—Animal Mechanism: A Treatise on Terrestrial and Aerial Locomotion, 1883. Mayer, Dr. Paolo—Sopra certi Organi di Senso nelle Antenne dei Ditteri, 1878-79. Meckel, H.—Muller’s Archiv. fur Anatomie, 1846. Miller, Dr. C. C.—A Year Among the Bees, 1888. Milne-Edwards—Manual of Zoology, 1863. Moufet,T.—Insectorum sine minimorum animalium Theatrum, 1634, Mullenhoff, Dr. K.—Formation of Honey-Comb (Pfluger’s Archiv f. gesammt. Physiol., XXXII, pp. 589-618,) 1883. Structure of the Honey-Bee’s Cell (Arch. f. Anat. und Physiol., pp. 371-375,) 1886. Muller, J.—Zur vergleichenden Physiologie des Gesichtsinnes, 1826. Fortgesetzte anatomische Untersuchungen uber den Bau der Augen bei den Insekten und Crustaceen, 1829, Munn, N. A.—Beyan on the Honey-Bee, 1870. Neighbour, ‘Alfred —The Apiary, 1878. Newman, Thomas G.—Bees and Honey, 1892. Newport, G.—On the Respiration of Insects, 1836. Insects (Todd’s Cyclopedia, Anat. and Phys.,) 1839. Article ‘Insecta,’ in Todd’s Cyclopedia of Anat. and Physiol., Vol. II, p. 980, 1839. On the Uses of the Antennz of Insects (Trans. Ent. Soc.,) 1837-40. On the Structure and Development of Blood (An. of Nat. Hist., XV., pp. 281-284,) 1845. On the Temperature of Insects, and its Connection with the Functions of Respiration and Circulation, 1837. Extracts from Essay in Martin Duncan’s Transforma- tion of Insects. Packard, Dr. A. S.—A Text-Book of Entomology, 1898. Very full and excellent. Guide to the Study of Insects, 1869. Pancritius, Paul.—Beitrage zur Kentniss der Flugelentwick- lung bei den Insekten, 1884. Parker & Haswell—Text-Book of Zoology, 1897. Perez, J.—Bulletin de la Soc.d’ Apicul. de la Gironde, 1878-1880 Les Abeilles, 1889. Perris, Ed—Memoire sur le siege de 1’odorat dans les Articules, 1850. 196 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; Pettigrew, J. Bell—On the Mechanical Appliances by which Flight is attained in the Animal Kingdom (Trans. Linn. Soc.,) 1870. Plateau, F.—Palpes des Insectes broyeurs (Bul. de 1a Soc. Zool. de France,) 1885. Recherches exp. sur la vision chez les Arthropodes (Comptes Rendus de la Soc. Ent. de Belg.,) 1887, (Bull. de VAcad. Roy. de Belgique,) 1888. Planta, Dr. A. von—Die Brutdeckel der Bienen (Schweitz. Bienenzeitung and Bul. d’Apic. de la Suisse Romande,) 1884. Coloration de la ciredes Abeilles (Revue Internationale,) 1885. Ueber die zugammensetzung einiger Nektar Arten (Brit. Bee Jour., Nectar and Honey,) 1886. Ueber den Futtersaft der Bienen, 1888. Nochmals uber den Futtersaft der Bienen (Schweitz. Bienenzeitung,) 1889. Pollmann, Dr. A.—Die Biene und ihre Zucht, 1875. Porter, C. J.—American Naturalist, XVII., p. 1238, 1883. Quinby, M.—Mysteries of Bee-Keeping, 1885. Ramdohr, T. C.—Kleine Abhandlungen aus der Anatom. und Physiol. der Insecten, 1811, 1813. Ranvier—Lecons sur l’histologie du systeme nerveux, 1878, Ratzeburg, Dr. J. T. C.—Untersuchung des Geschlechtszus- tandes bei den sogenannten Neutris der Bienen, 1833. Reaumur, R. A. F.—Memoires pour servir a l’histoire des In- sectes, 1734-1742. English Translation, 1744. Reid, Dr.—The Honey-Bee, by E. Bevan, p. 388, 1838. Rehberg, A.—Ueber die Entwicklung des Insectenflugels, 1886. Rendu, V.—L’ intelligence des Betes, 1864. Rombouts, Dr. J. E.—Locomotion of Insects on smooth Sur- faces (Amer. Mon. Mic. Jour.,) 1884. Root, A. I.—A B C of Bee-Culture, 1890. Root, L. C.—Quinby’s Mvsteries of Bee-Keeping, 1884. Schiemenz, P.—Uber das Herkommen des Futtersaftes und die Speicheldrusen der Biene, nebst einem Anhange uber das Riechorgan, 1883. Schindler, E.—Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Malpighi’schen Gefasse der Insekten, 1878. Schirach, A. G.—Physikalische Untersuchung der bisher un- bekannten aber nachher entdeckten Erzeugung d. Bienen- mutter, 1767. Schonfeld, Pastor—Bienenzeitung, 1854-1883. Illustrierte Bienenzeitung, 1885-1890. % The Mouth of the Stomach in the Bee (British Bee Journ.,) 1883. Schultze, M.—Untersuch. uber die zusammengesetzten Augen der Krebsen und Insekten, 1868. -. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 197 Sedgwick-Minot—Recherches histologique sur les trachees de ’Hydrophilus piceus (Arch. de Physiol. Paris,) 1876. Shuckard, W. E.—British Bees, 1866. Siebold, Dr. C. T. E. von—On a True Parthenogenesis in Moths and Bees, 1857. Bienenzeitung, 1872. Ueber die Stimm und Gehororgane der Krebse und In- sekten (Arch. fur Mic. Anat.,) 1860. Simmermacher, G.—Untersuchungen uber Haftapparate an ‘Tarsalgliedern von Insekten, 1884. Smith, Dr. J. B.—Economic Entomology, 1896. Straus-Durckheim, H.—L,’Anatomie comparee des animaux articules, 1828. Swammerdam, J.—Biblia Naturae, (in Dutch, German and English,) 1737-1752. Tegetmeier, W. B.—On the Formation of Cells (Rep. Brit. As- soc., pp. 132, 133,) 1858. On the Cells of the Honey-Bee (Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond., p. 34,) 1859. Thorley, J.—Melissologia ; or the Female Monarchy, 1744-1765. a ae oc of the Silkworm. (In Russian) 1879. Tinker, G. L.—Bee-Keeping for Profit, 1880. Treviranus, G. R.—Vermischte Schriften, 1817, and Zeitsch. fur Physiol., 1829. Treviranus, L. Ch.—Medizinische Zoologie, 1833. Viallanes, H.—Recherches sur les terminaisons nerveuses mot- rices dans les muscles stries des Insectes, 1881. Vogel, F. W.—Die Honigbiene und die Vermehrung der Bien- envolker, 1880. Waterhouse, G. R.—On the Formation of the Cells of Bees and Wasps, 1864. Weismann, A.—Zeitschrift f. Wissenschaft. Zool., 1863. Westwood’s Introduction to the Study of Insects, 1840. Wolff, Dr. O..J. B.—Das Riechorgan der Biene (Nova acta der K.L,. Arch. Deutsch. Akad. d. Naturf.,) 1875. Wyman, Dr. J.—Notes on the Cells of the Bee, 1866. Zoubareff, A.—Concerning an Organ of the Bee not yet de- scribed, (Brit. Bee Jour.,) 1883. PART SECOND. THE APLAR Y: ITS CARE AND MANAGEMENT. MOTTO :—" Keep all colonies strong.” Serr INTRODUCTION TO PART II. : : STARTING AN APIARY. In apiculture, as in all other pursuits, it is all-important to makea good beginning. This demands preparation on the part of the apiarist, the procuring of bees, and location of the apiary. PREPARATION. Before starting in the business, the prospective bee-keeper should inform himself in the art. READ A GOOD MANUAL. To do this, he should procure some good manual, and thoroughly study, especially that portion which treats of the practical part of the business. If accustomed to read, think and study, he should carefully read the whole work, but other- wise he will avoid confusion by only studying the methods of practice, leaving the principles and science to strengthen, and be strengthened by, his experience. Unless a student, he would better not take a journal tillhe begins the actual work, as so much unclassified information, without any experience to correct, arrange and select, will but mystify. For the same reason he may well be content with reading a single work till experience, anda thorough study of this one, make him more able to discriminate ; and the same reasoning will preclude his taking more than one bee-journal until he has hadat leasta year’s actual experience. VISIT SOME APIARIST. In this work of self-preparation, he will find great aid in visiting the nearest successful andintelligentapiarist. If suc- cessful, such a one will have a reputation; if intelligent, he will take the journals, and will show by his conversation that 202 THE BRE-KEEPER’S GUIDE ; he knows the methods and views of his brother apiarists, and, above all, he will not think he knows it all, and that his is the only way to success. If possible he should spend some weeks during the active season with such a bee-keeper, and should learn all he could of such a one, but always let judgment and common sense sit as umpire, that no plans or decisions may be made that judgment does not fully sustain. TAKE A COLLEGE COURSE. It will be most wise to take a course in some college, if age makes this practicable, where apiculture is thoroughly discussed. Here one will not only get the best training in his chosen business, as he will study, see and handle, and thus will have the very best aids to decide as to methods, system and apparatus, but will also receive that general culture which will greatly enhance life’s pleasures and usefulness, and which ever proves the best capitalin any vocation. At the Michigan Agricultural College there is a fully equipped apiary, and the opportunities for special study in bee-keeping and entomology are peculiarly good. Michigan is not ex- ceptional. DECIDE ON A PLAN. After such a course as suggested above, it will be easy to decide as to location, hives, style of honey to produce, and general system of management. But here, asin all the arts, all our work should be preceded by a well-digested plan of operations. As with the farmer and the gardener, only he who works to a plan can hope for the best success. Of course, such plans will vary as we grow in wisdom and experience. A good maxim to govern all plans is, ‘‘Go slow.’’ A good rule which will insure the above, ‘‘Pay as you go.’’? Make the api- ary pay for allimprovements in advance. Demand that each year’s credits exceed its debits; and that you may surely accomplish this keep an accurate account of all your receipts and expenses. This willbe a great aid in arranging the plans for each successive year’s operations. Above all, avoid hobbies, and be slow to adopt sweeping changes. ‘‘ Prove all things, hold fast that which is good.” ' OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. ” 203 HOW 10 PROCURE FIRST COLONIES. To procure colonies from which to form an apiary, as is in almost all kindred cases, itis always best to get them near at hand. We thus avoid the shock of transportation, can see the bees before we purchase, and in case there is any seeming mistake can easily gain a personal explanation and securea speedy adjustment of any real wrong. KIND OF BEES TO PURCHASE. Atthe same price always take Italians or Carniolans, as they are certainly best for the beginner. If common black bees can be secured for three, or even for two dollars less per colony, by all means take them, as they can be Italianized at a profit for the difference in cost, and, in the operation, the young apiarist will gain valuable experience. Our motto will demand that we purchase only strong colo- nies. If, as recommended, the ‘purchaser sees the colonies before the bargain isclosed, it will be easy to know that the colonies are strong. If the bees, as they come rushing out, remind you of Vesuvius at her best, or bring to mind the gush and rush at the nozzle of the fireman’s hose, then buy. In the hives of such colonies all combs will be covered by the middle of May with bees, and in the honey season brood will be abun- dant. Itisalways wisest to begin ina small way. He will generally succeed best who commences with not more than four or five colonies. IN WHAT KIND OF HIVES. As plans are already made, of course it is settled as to the style of hive to be used. If bees can be procured in such hives they will be worth just as much more than though in any other hive, as it costs to make the hive and transfer the bees. This will certainly be as muchas two or three dollars. No apiarist will tolerate, unless for experiment, two styles of hives in his apiary. Therefore, unless you find bees in such hives as you are to use, it will be best to buy them in box-hives if possible and transfer (see Chapter VII) to your own hives, as bees in box-hives can always be bought at reduced rates. In case the person from whom you purchase will take the hives 204 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; back at a fair rate, after you have transferred the bees to your own hives, then purchase in any style of movable-comb hive, as it is easier to transfer from a movable-comb hive than from a box-hive. Some bee-keepers, who were willing to wait, have purchased a queen and bees by the pound, and thus secured colonies at very slight expense. A single pound of bees with a queen will develop into a good colony in a single year. WHEN TO PURCHASE. It is safe to purchase any time in the summer. In April or May (of course you purchase only strong colonies) if in the latitude of New York or Chicago—it will be earlier further south—you can afford to pay more, as you will secure the increase both of honey and bees. If you desire to purchase in autumn, that you may gain bythe experience of wintering, either demand that the one of whom you purchase insure the safe wintering of the bees, or else that he reduce the selling price, at least one-third, from his rates the next April. Other- wise the novice would better wait and purchase in the spring. If you are to transfer at once, it is desirable that you buyin spring, as it is vexatious, especially for the riovice, to transfer when the hives are crowded with brood and honey. HOW MUCH TO PAY. Of course the market, which will ever be governed by sup- ply and demand, must guide you. But to aid you,I will append what at ‘present would be a reasonable schedule of spring prices almost anywhere in the United States: For box-hives, crowded with black bees—Italians would rarely be found in such hives—three dollars per colony isa fair price. For black bees in hives such as you desire to use, five dollars would be reasonable. For pure Italiansin such hives, seven dollars is not too much. If the person of whom you purchase will take the movable- comb hives after you transfer the bees, you can afford to pay three dollars for black bees, and five dollars for pure Italians. If you purchase in the fall, require 33% percent discount on these rates. The above is, of course, only suggestive, OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 205 WHERE TO LOCATH. If apiculture is an avocation, then your location will be fixed by your principal business or profession. And here I may state that, if we may judge from reports which come from nearly every section of the United States, from Maine to Texas, and from Florida to Oregon, you can hardly go amiss anywhere in our goodly land. If you are to engage as a specialist, then you can select first with reference to society and climate, after which it will be well to secure a succession of natural honey-plants (Chap- ter XVII), by virtue of your locality. This suggestion is im- portant, even in California, though it has far less weight than in other sections. If our location is along a river we shall find our honey harvest much prolonged, as the bloom on the upland will be early, while along the river flats it will be later. Who knows how much the many successful bee-keepers along the Mohawk Valley owe to their excellent location? The same holds true of the mouth of the canyons in California. The flowers of both mountain and valley: will then contribute of their sweets. Wealso gain in the prolonged honey-flow, as the mountain bloom is much the later. It will also be well to look for reasonable prospects of a good home market, as good home markets are, and must ever be, the most desirable. It will be important, also, that your neighborhood is not over- stocked with bees. Itis a well-established fact, that apiarists with few colonies receive relatively larger profits, especially in rather poor seasons, than those with large apiaries. While this may be owing in part to better care, much doubtless depends upon the fact that there is not an undue proportion of bees to the number of honey-plants, and consequent secretion of nectar. To have the undisputed monopoly of an area reach- ing at least two and one-half miles in every direction from your apiary, is unquestionably a great advantage. If you desire to begin two kinds of business, so that your dangers from possible misfortune may be lessened, then a small farm—especially a fruit-farm—in some locality where fruit-raising is successfully practiced, will be very desirable. You thus add others of the luxuries of life to the products of 206 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; your business, and at the same time may create additional pasturage for your bees by simply attending to your other business. In this case, your location becomes a more complex matter, and will demand still greater thought and attention. Some of America’s most successful apiarists are also noted as successful pomologists. A dairy farm, especially where win- ter dairying is carried on, would combine well with bee-keep- ing. The alsike clover would please alike the cattle and the bees. This is equally true in sections of California and Arizona, etc., only alfalfa takes the place of alsike clover. Bees are often taken ‘‘on shares.’”’ It is usual for one party to furnish the bees, the other to perform all the labor. The expenses are shared equally, as are the proceeds, both of bees and honey. Where one has more colonies of bees than will do well in one place—more than 100° East, more than 250 in California—then ‘‘out-apiaries’”’ are often desirable. Such men as Dr. Miller, Messrs. Manum, France, Dadant, Elwood, Mendleson, and Hetherington, find these very profitable. Of course, this is like running a railroad, and success will only mate with brains, gumption and pluck. The out-apiaries should be as convenient as bee-forage, roads and location will permit. If possible, it is wise to locateon some farm, and arrange so the farmer will have an interest that will insure some oversight when the apiarist is away. A fruit-grower may be wise enough to covet the presence of the bees, and so give service to secure it. Of course, convenient hives for moving, and a wagon arranged with suitable rack, are very desirable. Great pains must be taken that the bees are all secure.. Horses stung may mean great loss and harm. Mr. Manum makes assurance doubly sure by covering his horses entirely with cotton blan- kets. One enterprising and energetic enough to found out- apiaries will have the gumption to success, and fully meet every emergency. For position and arrangement of apiary see Chapter VI. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 207 CHAPTER V, HIVES AND SECTIONS. An early choice among the innumerable hives is of course demanded ; and here let me state with emphasis, that none of the standard hives are now covered by patents, so let no one buy rights. Itis in nearly all sections of our country, happily, unnecessary to decry patent hives. Our excellent bee-periodi- cals have driven from among us, forthe most part, that excres- cence—the patent-hive man. His wares were usually worth- less, and his life too often a lie, as his representations were not infrequently false to the letter. As our bee-men so gen- erally read the bee-papers, the patent-hive vendor will grow less and less, and will soon exist only in the past. It will be a blessed riddance. Success by the skillful apiarist with almost any hive, is possible. Yet, without question, some hives are far superior to others, and for certain uses, and with certain persons, some hives are far preferable to others, though all may be meritori- ous. Asachange in hives, after one is once engaged in api- culture, involves much time, labor and expense, this becomes an important question, and one worthy of earnest considera- tion by the prospective apiarist. I shall give it a first place, and a thorough consideration, in this discussion of practical apiculture. BOX-HIVES. I feel free to say that no person who reads, thinks and studies—and sticcess in apiculture can be promised to no other —will ever be content to use the old box-hives. In fact, thought and intelligence, which imply an eagerness to investi- gate, are essential elements in the apiarist’s character, and to such a one a box-hive would be valued just in proportion to the amount of kindling-wood it contained. I shall entirely ignore box-hives in the following discussions, for I believe no sensi- ble, intelligent apiarists, such as read books, will tolerate them, and that, supposing they should, it would be an expen- ‘ 208 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; sive mistake which I have no right to encourage, in fact, am bound to discourage, not only for the benefit of individuals, but also for the art itself. To be sure of success, the apiarist must be able to inspect the whole interior of the hive at his pleasure, must be able to Fic. 82. The Munn Hive, after Munn. exchange combs from one hive to another, and to regulate the movements of the bees—by destroying queen-cells, by giving or withholding drone-comb, by extracting the honey, by intro- ducing queens, and by many other manipulations to be ex- plained, which are only practicable with a movable-comb hive. MOVABLH-COMB HIVES. ‘There are, at present, two types of the movable-comb hive in use among us, each of which is unquestionably valuable, as each has advocates among our most intelligent, successful, and extensive apiarists. Each, too, has been superseded by the other, to the satisfaction of the person making the change. OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY,. 209 The kind most used consists of a box, in which hang the frames which hold the combs. ‘The adjacent frames are so far separated that the combs, which just fill them, shall be the proper distance apart. In the other kind, the ends of the frames are wider than the comb,and when in position are close together, and of themselves form two sides of a box. When in use these frames are surrounded bya second box, without a bottom, which, with them, rests on a bottom-board. Each of these kinds is represented by various forms, sizes, Fic. 83. Munn’s Improved Hive, after Munn. etc., where the details are varied to suit the apiarist’s notion. Yet, I believe thatall hives in present use, worthy of recom- mendation, fall within one or the other of the above-named types. HARLY FRAME HIVES. In 1843, Mr. Augustus Munn, of England, invented a mov- able-comb hive (Fig. 82), which I need hardly say was not the Langstroth hive, nora practical one. In 1851 this hive (Fig. 83) 210 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; was improved (?). Well does Neighbour say in his valu- able hand-book, ‘‘ This invention was of no avail to apiarists.”’ M. DeBeauvoys, of France, in 1847, and Schmidt, of Ger- many, in 1851, invented movable-comb hives. The frames were tight-fitting, and, of course, not practical. Dzierzon adopted the bar hive in 1838. In this hive each comb had to be cut loose as it was removed. It is strange that Mr. Cheshire speaks of Dzierzon’s hive in connection with the Langstroth. It was a different type of hive entirely. THE LANGSTROTH HIVE. In 1851 our own Langstroth, without any knowledge of what foreign apiarian inventors had done, save what he could find in Huber, and edition 1838 of Bevan, invented the hive (Fig. 84) now in common use among the advanced apiarists of Fic. 84. iN = 7a | I Att rh ——" Two-story Langstroth Hive-—From A. I. Root Co, America. It is this hive, the greatest apiarian invention evel made, that has placed American apiculture in advance or that of all other countries. What practical bee-keeper of America could agree with H. Hamet, edition 1861, p. 166, who, in speak- ing of the DeBeauvoys’ hive, says that the improved hives were without value except to the amateur, and inferior for practical purposes? Our apiarists not native to our shores, like the late Adam Grimm, Mr. C. F. Muth and Mr. Charles Dadant, always conceded that Mr. Langstroth was the inven- OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 211 tor of this hive, and always proclaimed its usefulness. Well did the late Mr. S. Wagner, the honest, fearless, scholarly, truth-loving editor of the early volumes of the American Bee “Journal, himself of German origin, say: ‘‘ When Mr. Lang- stroth took up this subject, he well knew what Huber had done, and saw wherein he had failed—failing, possibly, only because he aimed at nothing more than constructing an observatory hive suitable for his purposes. Mr. Langstroth’s object was other and higher. He aimed at making frames movable, inter- changeable, and practically serviceable in bee-culture.”” And how true what follows: ‘‘ Nobody before Mr. Langstroth ever succeeded in devising a mode of making and using a movable frame that was of any practical value in bee-culture.’’ No man in the world, besides Mr. Langstroth, was so conversant with this whole subject as was Mr. Wagner. His extensive library and thorough knowledge made hima competent judge. Mr. Langstroth, though he knew of no previous invention of frames contained in a case, when he made his invention, in 1851, does not profess to have been the first to have invented them. Every page of his book shows his transparent honesty, and his desire to give all due credit to other writers and inven- tors. He does claim, and very justly, to have invented the first practical frame hive, the one described in his patent, applied for in January, 1851, and in all three editions of his book. For this great invention, as wellas his able researches in apiculture, as given in his invaluable book, ‘‘ The Honey-Bee,”’ he has conferred a benefit upon our art which can not be over- estimated, and for which we, asapiarists, can not be too grate- ful. It was his book—one of my old teachers, for which I have no word of chiding—that led me to some of the most delightful investigations of my life. It was his invention—the Lang- stroth hive—that enabled me to make those investigations. For one, I shall always revere the name of Langstroth, as a great leader in scientific apiculture, both in America and throughout the world. His name must ever stand beside those of Dzierzon and the elder Huber. Surely this hive, which left the hands of the great master in so perfect a form that even the details remain practically unchanged by many, I think 212 THE BEEH-KEEPER’S GUIDE; most, of our first bee-keepers, should ever bear his name. Thus, though many use square frames like the Gallup, or deep frames, yet all are Langstroth hives. CHARACTER OF THE HIVE. ‘The main feature of the hive should be simplicity, thereby excluding drawers and traps of all kinds. The hive should be made of good pine or whitewood lumber, thoroughly seasoned, ~~ Se or] Ss = ONS LL 2 Principle of Warping.—From A. I. Root Co. planed on both sides, and painted white on the outside. In making the hive nail the heart side of the board out, so as to prevent warping. To understand why see Fig.85. Figure 84 ss o ll FECL itl One-story Langstroth Hive-—From A, I, Root Co. represents a two-story Langstroth hive. As will be seen, this has a portico, and a bottom-board firmly nailed to the hive. Although Mr. Langstroth desired both these features, and many now are like-minded, many others omit both features. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 213 This hive holds eight frames, which are as many as such bee- keepers as Messrs. Heddon, Taylor and Hutchinson desire. Figure 86 represents the Simplicity one-story Langstroth hive as made by A. I. Root. This contains 10 frames, which, unfortunately, were slightly modified so that they are 175% instead of 173g inches long. Thus, this is not the Langstroth Fic. 87. Two-story Langstroth Hive (Gallup Frame.)—Original. a Cover hinged to hive. b Upper story. e Brood-chamber. d@ Bottom-board. e Alighting-board. i Wide section-frames. Brood-frames. h, h Frames outside hive, 214 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE ; frame, but the Simplicity-Langstroth. This style, one-story, is designed for securing comb honey, while the two-story (Fig. 84) is intended for use in obtaining extracted honey. Figure 87 represents a two-story Simplicity-Langstroth hive with Gallup frame; which is 11!{ inches square. This hive is pre- ferred by G. M. Doolittle. I have used it more than any other, and it has much to recommend it. The Simplicity feature invented by A. I. Root, I think, consists of a bevel union of hive with cover and bottom-board (Fig. 87). I think Mr. Root prefers this style no longer. Any Langstroth hive, with what- Fic. 88. = —_—— ae _ a 'S il: mn) TT i a_i TT : an : eR si ce INTE He qo KONO IN Hl Ta i COC a UT NA il ne | ANC = a Ht ba ~ il S| Jones’ Chaff-Hive, Frame, Frame for Beets, Division-Board and eye ated-Zine Division-Board.—From D, A, Jones. ever frame, with these bevel connections is a Simplicity hive. ‘This hive can be used to secure either comb or extracted honey. The bottom-board, d, and the alighting-board, ¢, may be separate from each other and from the hive; the opening may be made by cutting a V-shaped space in the bottom-board, while the cover, a, may or may not be hinged to the upper story. Mr. Root, in the original Simplicity, used the cover as a bottom-board, and formed an entrance by pushing the hive a little toone side. Many prefer to have the cover with a gable (Fig. 88), so madeas to join the hive with a rabbet (Fig. 86 and 88), or to shut over the hive and rest on shoulders formed by OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 215 nailing cleats about the hive near the top. These are heavy and costly. I much prefer a flat cover, and, if necessary to keep out water, we can follow Mr. Doolittle’s plan and sheet with tin or zinc, though I think this unnecessary. Figure 88 represents the Jones chaff hive. This takesa deep frame, and has double walls for chaff packing. ‘These chaff hives are expensive, hard to handle and awkward to man- age. After years of experience I discarded the chaff hives as no better in summer than the single-walled hives, and not so safe in winter asa good cellar. I have disposed of all of mine except three, which I keep for examples. Many, however, prefer such hives, and in some sections, and with some bee- keepers, they may be desirable. WHAT STYLE TO ADOPT, For many yearsI have used the Heddon-Langstroth, and like it so much that I recommend it above all others that I have tried. It is not only the simplest hive I have ever seen, but possesses many substantial advantages that are not possessed by any other hive so farasI know. It can be used with any size frame desired. I have it in use both with Langstroth and Gallup frames. I am free to express my preference for the Langstroth hive, with Langstroth frames. Its excellence warrants me in doing so, and the fact that it is by far the most used of any hive in the country, gives great advantage when one wishes to buy or sell bees. No beginner can make a mis- take in adopting this hive. I will describe the hive for Lang- stroth frame, but would advise any one to geta good hive asa pattern, if he is to adopt them, as much depends upon perfect exactness. : The bottom-board and alighting-board (Fig. 87) may be separateif preferred, or not nailed tothe hive. Mr. Heddon nails the bottom-board fast, and lets it project at one end, as seen in the figure (Fig. 89). A hive-stand is made by taking two boards (Fig. 89, F) six inches wide, and nearly as long as the bottom-board. Connect these at one end by a board 4% inches wide, and as long as the hive is wide, nailed firmly at the bottom, and into the ends, and at the other end by a like board nailed the same way. We see (Fig. 94) this end-piece at the 216 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; front of the hive nailed at the bottom so it rests on the ground. At the opposite end a like piece is nailed in the same way, so that all is even on the bottom. Figure 89 explains this better. The bottom of the hive (Fig. 89, 4) is 13x19% inches, outside measure, the sides made of six-eighths inch, bottom and cover of five-eighths, and ends of seven-eighths inch lumber. The height of this piain box is just 10 inches; that is, it is made of Fre. 89 = — — ———— = | “or ——— Heddon-Langstroth Hive-—From James Heddon. F Bottom-board. A Brood-chamber. C Honey-board. D Case with sections. E Cover. boards 10 inches wide. The side boards are 19% inches long, so that they nail to the ends of the end-boards. If the corners are rabbeted, or, better, dovetailed (Fig. 90), they will be stronger, and less apt to separate with age and use. When used with the Gallup frame the ends of the hive project, and are nailed into the ends of the side-boards. The end-boards are rabbeted on top. This rabbet is cut three-eighths of an inch deeper than the thickness of the top-bar of the frame. With the Gallup frame (Fig. 96) we rabbet the side-boards. If the top-bar is three-eighths of an inch thick this rabbet should OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 217 be six-eighths precisely. This is very important, as we must have a three-eighths space exactly between the top-bar and the top of the hive. If we make the hive ten and one-eighth (10%) inches high we give a space of half-inch between the bottom of the frame and bottom of hive. I like this wide space, and there is no objection to it. Near the top of the hive we will nail narrow cleats entirely around it; these strengthen the hive, and are convenient supports by which to lift the hive. Hand grooves (Fig. 90) can also be cut in end and side-boards for convenience in handling, if desired. Mr. Root favors these hand-holes always. They are easily cut, and are surely a convenience. The entrance is cut in the end of the hive (Fig. 89), and the size is easily regulated by use of the Langstroth triangular Fic. 90. i Hors as f Betis Hi ive.—From A, I. Root Co blocks (Fig. 89, 8, &). Thus we may gauge the size to our liking. I would have the entrance the whole width of the hive, and seven-eighths of an inch high. This may aid to prevent the bees hanging out of the hive, and likewise may restrain the swarming impulse. The opening in the bottom- board (Fig. 87) is preferred by many. This is enlarged or restricted by simply pushing the hive forward or back, and, of 218 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE 3 course, can only be used with loose bottom-boards. ‘The fact that most bee-keepers nail the bottom-board firmly and cut the opening from the hive, argues that this on the whole is the better style. For shipping and moving bees, which, with ‘‘out-apiaries ’’ and change of location to secure better pastur- age, promises to be more and more the practice, the nailed Fic. 91. Queen-Excluding Honey-Board.—From D, A. Jones. bottom-boards are very desirable; for quick cleaning of the hives when spring opens, the movable bottoms are preferable. There should never be but this one opening. Auger-holes above, and openings opposite the entrance, are worse than useless, Except in very damp locations the hive should not rest more than five or six inches from the ground. Tired and heavily laden bees, especially on windy days, may fail to gain the hive, if it is high up, as they return from the field. For extracted honey, we use a second story precisely like the body of the hive, exceptit is a half-inch lessin depth; that is, the sides are 9% instead of 10 inches wide. Mr. Dadant prefers half-story hives for the extracting frames, but he uses the large Quinby frame (Fig. 95). If we wish we can follow Da- dant, and use two or more of these upper stories, and tier up, in OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 219 which case we would not need to extract until the close of the harvest, when the honey would be ripened in the hive. Upon the body of the hive rests the slatted honey-board (Fig. 91). It is seen in place (Figs. 89 and 93). This is also 13 by 19% inches. The outer rim of this valuable invention and the slats are in one plane on the under surface, and the slats are three-eighths of an inch apart, leaving passages that width for the bees to pass through. On the upper surface the rim projects three-eighths of an inch above the slats, so that if a board be laid on the honey-board its lower surface will be three-eighths of an inch above the slats. When the honey- board is placed on the hive, the spaces between the slats must rest exactly over the center of the top-bars of the brood-frames below. In using hives with the Gallup or American frames the slats of course will run crosswise of ‘the honey-board, and as before must break joints with the top-bars of the frames. i ivision-Board. Perforated-Zine Division-Board. pen —From D. A. Jones. The use of this prevents the bees from building brace-combs above the brood-frames, and keeps the sections very neat. No one after using this will do without it, Iamsure. By tacking a piece of perforated-zinc (Fig. 92) on the under side of this honey-board it also becomes a queen-excluder. The grooves in the zinc must be very exact. They are .165 of an inch wide. It is cheaper, and so better, simply to place a narrow strip of the perforated-zinc between the slats of the honey-board (Fig. 220 THE BRE-KREPER’S GUIDE; 91). By grooving the edges of the slats it is easy to insert the zinc strips when making the honey-board. ‘The honey-board may be wholly of zinc with a wooden rim. The objection to this is the fact that the zinc is likely to sag and bend. Mr. Heddon suggests that a V-shaped piece of tin be soldered across the middle to strengthen the zinc and prevent sagging. The tin should be so placed as not to touch the frames below, but come between them. Mr. Heddon also suggests that the wooden rim be replaced by a narrow margin of the zinc itself, bent at right angles to the plane of the metal. THE HEDDON SURPLUS-CASEH. As this admirable case is also a part of this hive, I will describe it right here, though it properly belongs to the sub- ject of case for surplus honey. This caseis just as long and broad as the hive, and three-eighths of an inch deeper than the height of the section to be used. (See Fig. 89, D.) Thus, on the hive described it will be 13 by 19% inches, andif we use common 1-pound sections, which are 4% inches square, it will be 456 inches deep. Partitions are fastened in by use of screws or nails just far enough apart to receive the sections; thus, in the 1-pound sections, 414 inches apart. These parti- tions are as wide as the crate or caseis deep. Narrow strips of tin are nailed to the bottom of these partitions and to the bottom of the ends of the case, projecting enough to sustain the sections when they are placed in the case. It will be seen that when in place the sections reach to within three-eighths of an inch of the top of the case. This must be just three-eighths of an inch. It keeps the sections all clean, but will not if not Just this bee-space. . THE COVER. The cover of the hive (Fig. 89, £) isa plain board, a little wider and longer than the hive. The ends of this are fitted into a grooved cross-piece about twice as thick as the board, and firmly nailed. These cross-pieces prevent the top from warping and splitting. If preferred, the cover need be no longer or wider than the hive. In this case cross-pieces should be firmly nailed on the upper side to prevent warping or split- ting. It will be seen that we have here no telescoping, and no OR, MANUAL, OF THER APIARY. 221 beveling—simply one board rests upon another. At first I was much prejudiced against this simple arrangement. After giving it a thorough trial I wish nothing else. The only criti- cism I have for this hive after several years’ experience is, that if the board cover is used in spring, the protection is in- sufficient. We break the propolis or glue in examining the bees, and then as the bees can not glue all close at this early season, the brood is apt to chill, and the bees to suffer, espe- cially if the sides of the hives have shrunken, or the cover warped. By use of a quilt or warm woolen cloth just the size of the hive placed above, and a crate filled with dry sawdust above this, allis made snug and comfortable, and even this objection disappears. To adopt this style of hiveis not ex- pensive. Wecan use the same frames as before, and can make all new hives of this simple, plain pattern, and in time we will have only these hives. To shade the hive nothing is so good as a shade-board made considerably wider than the hive, and nailed to two cleats five inches wide. Thus, when resting on the hive this shade-board will be five inches above the top of the hive. This has never blown off of my hives. Should it do so a brick could easily be fastened to the under side, out of sight, and thus make it entirely safe against winds. Thus I have described the Heddon-Langstroth hive minutely, as with W. Z. Hutchinson, R. Ll. Taylor, and many others of our most able and intelligent apiarists, I find it, upon trial, as excellent as it is simple. Surely, when we can har- ness excellence and simplicity together we have a most desir- able team. The simple union of parts by mere plain contact of the edges, or the cover simply lying on the hive, while it is just as acceptable to the bees, makes the hive far more simple of construction, and easy of manipulation. The honey-board and bee-spaces keep all so neat, that as one bee-keeper well says, their extra expense is very soon savedin the saving of time which their use insures. Any who may think of trying this hive better do as I did, try two or three at first, and see if in their judgment the ‘‘ game is worth the candle.” All hives should be well painted with white paint. This. color makes the heat less trying to the combs and bees, While 222 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; it may not be profitable to paint, yet when neatness and dura- bility are both considered, surely painting pays well. For paint I would use white lead, zinc and oil—avout one-third as much zinc as lead. Mr. Doolittle, whose opinion justly ranks very high among American bee-keepers, thinks that white paint makes shade unnecessary. DIVISION-BOARD. A close-fitting division-board (Fig. 92) is very important, and no Langstroth hive is complete without it. Mr. Heddon, in his excellent book, follows the English, and calls this a dummy. Itis especially useful in autumn, winter and spring in contracting the hive, and thus economizing heat, and at the harvest seasons in contracting the brood-chamber, so as to secure the honey in the sections where it is desired. It is made the same formas the frames, but is alittle larger so that it is close-fitting in the hive. It iseasily made by nailing a top-bar of the usual frame on top of a board that will just fit in the hive, and reach to the top of the rabbet. If desired the board may be beveled at the edges. When the division-board is inserted in the hive it separates the brood-chamber into two parts by a close partition. Many bee-keepers make them like a close-fitting frame and cover with cloth, which is stuffed with chaff. Others groove the edges and insert a strip of cloth orrubber. Thechaff board is for greater warmth, the rubber to make the board fit closely, and yet give enough to make it easy to withdraw the division-board when it swells from dampness. Mr. Jones prefers that the division-board should not reach quite to the bottom of the hive (Fig. 88). This en- ables the bees to pass under, and as heat rises there is very little objection to this bee-space under the division-board. We use the division-board to contract the chamber in winter, to vary it so as tokeep all combs covered with bees in spring, to contract the brood-chamber when we wish to securea full force of bees in the sections, to convert our hives into nucleus hives for queen-rearing, and in case we secure comb honey in two-story hives, which, however, we do not practice now, to contract the upper chamber when the season first opens. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 223 CLOTH COVERS. After the season is over, and the weather becomes cold, about the 20th of September, it is well to remove the honey- board, and to cover above the bees with a piece of heavy factory cloth, which thus forms the immediate cover for the beesin winter. The section-case full of dry, fine sawdust has now this cloth for its bottom, while the cover of the hive rests on the section-case. It will be noted that I have made no mention in the above of metal rabbets, or, more correctly, metal supports. I have tried these for some years, and have usually recommended them, but for the past several yearsI have omitted them, and think I shall have no further use for them in my hives. If we wish them we have only to cut the rabbeta little deeper and tack inside the hive, just below the rabbet, a narrow strip of heavy tin, which shall projecta little above the wooden rabbet, just enough to raise the top of the frame to within three- eighths of an inch of the top of the hive. Theadvantages of these are that they make a very narrow rest or support for the frames, and so the latter are more easily loosened, and in care- less hands are less apt to kill bees when put into the hives. It is always easy, however, by meansof a chisel to loosen frames, and if we are often manipulating our bees, as when extracting in summer, the frames are easily loosened without the metal supports. Some apiarists make hives without rabbets, making the frames to rest on the topof the hive. I have tried such hives thoroughly, and wish no more of them. Of course, with such hives the valuable honey-board and bee-spaces are im- possible. THH NEW HEDDON HIVE. Mr. Heddon has patented and offered to the public a new hive which combines in principle the Langstroth and the Huber. Ihave tried this hive only for a short time, and so, guided by the rule I have always adopted, I do not recommend it. Yet the experienced bee-keeper can often judge correctly of what he has never tried, and I will add that I fully believe this hive and the method Mr. Heddon gives of manipulation in his valuable book, are well worth our attention. Mr. Heddon 224 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; is so able that he rarely recommends what is not valuable. Several others have tried this hive, and speak in the highest terms of its value. Among these are no less authorities than R. L. Taylor and W. Z. Hutchinson. At the beginning of this chapter I caution all against patent hives. This is necessary, as so many frauds have been committed under this guise; but if Mr. Heddon has given us something as valuable as it is unique and original, he well deserves a patent, which should be thoroughly respected, as should all worthy inventive effort. From my brief experience I fear the hive is too complicated for the average bee-keeper. With a much longer experience (1900) Ican not recommend it. It works admirably if every- thing is perfectly exact; otherwise it isa vexation. Absolute exactness is rare in our day and world. I shall describe the hive only in brief, advising all who. wish to investigate this newcomer, to procure Mr. Heddon’s work, ‘‘ Success in Bee-Culture,’’ as this will bean excellent investment aside from the matter of the hive. This hive (Fig. 93) has close-fitting frames fastened in a case by use of wooden thumb-screws. The end-bars of the frames are wide like those of the Huber hives, and rest on tin supports. The top and bottom bars of the hives are only as wide as the natural comb, seven-eighths of an inch. The frames are only five and three-eighths (534) inches deep, and this with the wide spaces between them makes it possible to do much withont removing the frames. There is a three-eighths inch space above the frames, and a honey-board as in the Heddon-Langstroth hive. Thus, one or two shallow hives can be used, and to con- tract the brood-chamber at any time we have only to remove one of them. Figure 93 shows the hive, which, with two brood-chambers, gives about the capacity of a 10-frame Lang- stroth hive. As all frames are securely held by the screws, any brood-chamber can be reversed, or any two can change places at the pleasure of the bee-keeper. I have found the screws to swell and work with extreme difficulty. I think Mr. Taylor excludes the screws, and wedgesthe frames instead. As the combs will all be firmly attached on all sides to the frames, there is no space for hiding, and the queen can gen- OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 225 erally be found without removing the frames. I haveseen Mr. Taylor find several queens with these hives in a few minutes time. Fic. 93. i ins ih SO The New Heddon Hive.—From James Heddon. d Stand. D E S8ection-cases. H Thumb-screw. B C Two sections, M Slatted honey-board. F Cover. 226 THE BHE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; The bottom-board (Fig, 94) has a raised rim. Thus the frames are one-half inch from the bottom. Of course, the bottom-board is loose. Mr. Heddon recommends single-story wide-frames with separators for the sections. These are alsc secured by the screws, and so any frame or the whole case can be reversed at will. Of course, the old Heddon case without separators could be used, but could not be reversed. The points of excellence claimed for this hive,and I know from my experience that they are real, are easy contraction of brood-chamber, quick inversion of the brood-chamber or section-case, ease and quick- Fic. 94. Heddon Bottom-Board.—From James Heddon. ness Of manipulation, and the interchangeableness of the brood-chambers forming the hive,and the power we have by quick and easy contraction of the brood-chamber to get all light-colored honey in the sections if we so desire. Mr. J. M. Shuck has also patenteda hive for which he claims the same advantages gained in the new Heddon hive. I have not worked with it enough to recommend it. I fear the hives are too complex for the general bee-keeper. The fact, too, that perfection of work and measurements despite our best care are very rare, urges against this hive, as it must be very accurate or itis asore vexation. I advise all to go slowin adopting them, as we know the old, tried ones are excellent. 7 OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 227 fear that in the hands of the general bee-keepers these new hives will not prove satisfactory. THE FRAMES. The form and size of frames, though not quite as various as the persons whouse them, are still very different (Fig. 95). Some prefer large frames. I first tried the Quinby frame, and afterward the Langstroth (Fig. 95). The advantage claimed Fic. 95. 12 18% re by l= AMERICAN. QUINBY. x ny 175% £g GALLUP. LANGSTROTH. ® od 13% n 19% ADAIR. X CLOSED END QUINBY. [2 Brood- Frames.—From A. I. Root Co. for large frames is that there are less to handle, and time is saved; yet may not smaller frames be handled so much more dextrously, especially if they are to be handled through all the long day, as to compensate, in partat least, for the number ? The advantage of the shallow frame is, as claimed, that the bees will gointo boxes more readily; yet they are not consid- ered by some bee-keepers as safe for out-door wintering. This is the style recommended and used by Mr. Langstroth, which fact may account for its popularity in the United States. 228 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; Another frame in common use, is one about one foot square. I have long used one 11)4 inches square, and still think that this frame has much to commend it. It is light, easily handled, convenient for nucleus hives, and perhaps the best form for forming a compact winter cluster; and yet upon mature re- flection I have decided to use in future, as already stated, the Langstroth frame, and advise all others to do so. It is very desirable to have beesin hives such as others will wish in case we sell bees, as every bee-keeper is almost Fic. 96. Gallup Frame.—Original. a Top-bar. ec Comb-guide. b, b Side-bars or uprights. d Bottom-bar. sure to do more or less each year. The Langstroth hive is used much more generally than any other, and thatit is excellent is shown in the fact that most of our successful bee-keepers, from Canada to the Gulf, use it, and I am free to say that, taking the whole country through, it is doubtful if a better style or form exists than the regular Langstroth. The chief objection urged against its use, that it is not the best form to secure safe wintering, lacks force in view of the fact that many who have been most successful use this frame. Indeed, with thorough protection this frame is as good as any, and most bee-keepers are learning that in our Northern States pro- tection is absolutely essential to success. That we shall ever have a uniform frame used by all api- arists, though exceedingly desirable, is too much to be hoped. Ido not think there is sufficient advantage in any form to war- rant us in holding to it, if by yielding we could secure this uniformity. Nor doIthink the form and size so material as OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 229 to make it generally desirable for the apiarist tochange all his hives, to secure a different style of frame. To make a Langstroth frame I would use a top-bar (Fig. 96)—the figure illustrates a Gallup frame which is square, and will serve to make this explanation clearer, eighteen and seven- eighths (187%) inches long, seven-eighths (7%) of an inch wide, and one-fourth (4%) of an inch thick. The end-bars (Fig. 96, 6, 6) should be eight and five-eighths (854) inches long, and as wideand thick as the top-bar. The top-bar is fastened to the end-bars, as shown in the figure, by nailing through it into Fic. 97. Reversible Frame, Upper one hung in the Hive, Lower one partly reversed. —From James Heddon. the ends of the end-bars, soas to leave the top-bar projecting three-fourths (34) of an inch. The bottom-bar is seventeen and three-eighths (1734) inches long, and as wide arid thick as the other parts—though it may be only one-half as thick if pre- ferred. It is also nailed to the ends of the end-bars, so that it isaslong asthe frame. The parts when made at the factory are often dovetailed so as to be more securely united. For some years I have used the reversible frame (Fig. 97), which has valuable features which would warrant its use were 230 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE}; it not for its complexity. With this frame there is no danger of the top-bar sagging, which is sure to enlarge the bee-space above and create mischief, and by inverting we secure the firm attachment of the comb to the frame along all its edges, and it helps to force our bees into the sections, simply by inverting the combs. This may not always succeed with the unskillful—some bee-keepers report failure—and it re- quires some time and attention. Figure 97 shows the charac- ter of the reversible frame as made by Mr. Heddon, and which I have found to work the best of any that I have used. As will be seen, the reversible partis a rectangle, pivoted in the center to the bottom of the short end-bars. These short end- bars at the top come within one-fourth (4%) inch of the side of the hive, and thin a little as they run down, so that the lower end is three-eighths (3s) of an inch from the side of the hive. The bottom of the frame, indeed all below the short end-bar, is three-fourths (34) of an inch from the side of the hive. This makes it easy to put in the frames without crushing the bees. It might be supposed that the bees would build combs between the lower end of the frame and the hive, but I have never seen acase of the kind, andI have used such. frames now quite extensively for several years. These frames reverse very easily, and I do not know a single person who has thoroughly tried them, who does not value them highly. Here again let me suggest that in making changes, a few be tried first, and not all till we know we wish them. As the use of comb foundatiow secures straight combs, with no drone-cells, it isvery desirable. When this is fastened by merely pressing or sticking it to the top-bar, it is apt to sag and warp, hence it is becoming quite the custom to wire the frames (Fig.97). This insures perfect safety if we wish to ship our bees, and secures against sagging or bulging of the foundation. If the foundation is put on with the Given press as the foundation is made, No. 36 wire is used; if pressed on by hand No. 30 wire is better. The timber for frame should be thoroughly seasoned, and of the best pine or white wood. Care should be taken that the frame be made so as to hang vertically, when suspended on OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 231 the rabbets of the hive. To secure this very important point— true frames that will always hang true—they should always be made around a guide. A BLOCK FOR MAKING FRAMKES. This may be made as follows: Take a rectangular board (Fig. 98) eleven and one-eighth by thirteen and a quarter inches. On both ends of one face of this, nail hard-wood pieces (Fig. 98, ¢, e) one inch square and ten and three-fourths inches long, so that one end (Fig. 98, g, g) shall lack three- eighths inch of reaching the edge of the board. On the other face of the board, nail a strip (Fig. 98, c) four inches wide and eleven and three-eighths inches long, at right angles to it, and in such position that the ends shall just reach to the edges of Block for making Gallup Frames.—Original. the board. Midway between the one-inch-square pieces, screw on another hard-wood strip (Fig. 98, d) one inch square and four inches long, parallel with and three-fourths of an inch from the edge. To the bottom of this, screw a semi-oval piece of hoop-steel (Fig. 98, 6, 5), which shall bend around and press against the square strips. The ends of this should not reach quite to the bottom of the board. Near the ends of this spring fasten, by rivets, a leather strap an inch wide (Fig. 98, a), 232 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE} which shall be straight when thusriveted. These dimensions are for frames eleven and one-fourth inches square, outside measure, and must be varied for other sizes. Instead of the iron and strap, some use two pieces of wood with a central pivot. The upper ends of these levers are united by a strong elastic cord, so that the lower ends are constantly pressed against the side-pieces of the block. Recently we have used in such blocks, both for frame and section-making, a single hard-wood strip, a little shorter than the distance between the strips¢ande. Thisis pivoted at the center to the center of the block. This isa very simple way to hold the side-pieces firmly against the strips ¢, e. We have only to turn this lever. To use this block, we crowd the end-bars of our frames between the steel springs (Fig. 98, 6, 5) and the square strips (Fig. 98, e, e); then lay on our top-barand nail, after which we invert the block and nail the bottom-bar, as we did the top-bar. Now press down on the strap (Fig. 98, a), which will loosen the frame, when it may be removed all complete and true. Such a gauge not only insures perfect frames, but demands that every piece shall be cut with great accuracy, and some such arrangement should always be used in making the frames. The above description and Fig. 98 are for Gallup frames. For Langstroth frames the hard-wood strips would be eight and five-eighths (85g) inches long, and the distance between them would be sixteen and seven-eighths (16%) inches, that is, if the frames are made of pieces one-fourth of an inch thick. To make reversible frames we use two such guides. Wire nails are very excellent for making frames, and just the thing for the pivots in reversible frames. When the frames are in the hive there should be at least a one-fourth or three-eighths inch space between the end of the frame and side of the hive. As before stated, the space below the frame may be one-half inch. A much wider space on the sides than that given above is likely to be filled with comb, and so prove vexatious. The wide space below gives no such trouble,and in winter it is desirable, as also in case the hive shrinks. It is very undesirable to have the frames reach to the bottom of the hive. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 233 The distance between the frames may be one-half of an inch, or best one and three-eighths inches from center to cen- ter of the frames. This is better than one and one-half, as the brood is kept warmer, and worker-brood is more likely to be reared. A slight variation either way does noharm. Some men, of very precise habits, prefer nails or wire staples in the side and bottom of the frames. Mr. Cheshire calls these his suggestions, though Mr. Langstroth used them over twenty years ago, which, if I am correctly informed, was before Mr. Cheshire kept bees at all. These are to insure equal spacing of the frames. Mr. Jones prolongs the sides and bottom of the frame (Fig. 88) for the same purpose. These projections extend just a quarter of aninch, so as to maintain this un- varying distance. Some bee-keepers use frames with wide, close-fitting end-bars, or with top-bars wide and close-fitting Fic. 99. Hoffman Frames,—From A. I. Root Co, attheends. Mr. Root now favors the Hoffman frame (Fig. 99), as he calls it, which has the top-bar and upper ends of the end-bars wide and close-fitting. He claims more rapid hand- ling, as the frames, he says, can be handled in groups. I have tried all these styles, and do not like them. It is easy for any bee-keeper to try them. ‘‘Prove all things; hold fast that which is good,” or that which pleases you. COVER FOR FRAMES. As before stated, a board covers the hive all through the honey season. This rests upon the upper story of the hive, or upon the upper section-case. From September to June, in the 234 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE}; cold Northern climate, a piece of thick factory cloth should rest on the frames as before stated. This is just the size of the hive, and when properly adjusted no beecan pass above it. By cutting on three sides of an inch square, we form a flap in this cloth which may be turned back to permit the bees to enter the feeder, when feeding isdesired. In fall, winterandspring, a section-case left on the hive and filled with fine sawdust or chaff is a most desirable substitute for a heavy, awkward chaff hive. Dr. Miller covers the year through with a cloth cover. THE HUBER HIVE. The other type of hives originated when Huber hinged several of hig leaf or unicomb hives together so that the frames would open like the leaves of a book. In August, 1779, Huber wrote to Bonnet as follows: ‘I took several small fir-boxes, a foot square and fifteen lines wide, and joined them togther by hiuges, so that they could be opened and shut like the leaves of a book. When using a hive of this description, we took care to fix a comb in each frame, and then introduced all the bees.”’ (Edinburgh edition of Huber, p. 4.) Although Morlot and others attempted to improve the hive, it never gained favor with practical apiarists. In 1866, Mr. T. F. Bingham, then of New York, improved upon the Huber hive, securing a patent on his triangular-frame hive. This, sofaras Ican judge, was the Huber hive made practical. Mr. Bingham now uses a modification of this hive (Fig. 101). In 1868, Mr. M. S. Snow, then of New York, now of Minne- sota, procured a patent on his hive, which was essentially the same asthe hives now known as the Quinby and Bingham hives. Soon after, the late Mr. Quinby brought forth his hive, which is essentially the same as the above, only differing in details. No patent was obtained by Mr. Quinby, whose great heart and boundless generosity endeared him to all acquaint- ances. Those who knew him best never tire of praising the unselfish acts and life of this noble man. If we except Mr. Langstroth, no other man, especially in the early days, did so much to promote the interest and growth of improved apicul- OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 235 ture in the United States. His hive, his book, his views of win- tering, and foul brood, hisintroduction of the bellows-smoker— a gift to apiarists—all speak his praise asa man andan api- arist. The facts that the Bingham hive, as now made, is a great favorite with those that have used it, that Mr. Quinby pre- ferred this style or type of hive, that the Quinby form is used by the Hetherington brothers—Capt. J. E., the prince of Ameri- can apiarists, with his thousands of colonies, and O. J., whose neatness, precision, and mechanical skill are enough to awaken envy—are surely sufficient to excite curiosity and be- speak a description. The Quinby hive (Fig. 100) as used by the Hetherington brothers, consists of a series of rectangular frames (Fig. 100) Fic. 100. Frame, Bottom-Board and Frame-Support, of Quinby Hive.—Original. twelve by seventeen inches, outside measure. The end-bars of these frames are one and one-half inches wide, and half an inch thick. The top and bottom one inch wide and half an inch thick. The outer halves of the end-bar project one-fourth of an inch beyond the top and bottom bars. This projection is lined on the inside with sheet-iron, which is inserted in a groove which runs one inch into eachend of the end-pieces, and is tacked by the same nails that fasten the end-bars to the top and bottom bars. ‘This iron at the end of the bar bends in at right-angles (Fig. 100, 2), and extends one-fourth of an inch parallel with the top and bottom bars, Thus, when these 236 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; frames stand side: by side, the ends are close, while half-inch openings extend between the top and bottom bars of adjacent frames. The bottom-bars, too, are one-fourth of an inch from the bottom-board. Tacked to the bottom-board, in line with the position of the back end-bars of the frames, is an inch strip of sheet-iron (Fig. 100, 4, 6) sixteen inches in length. One-third of this strip, from the front edge back, is bent over so it lies not quite in contact with the second third, while the posterior third receives the tacks which hold it to the bottom- board. Now, when in use, this iron flange receives the hooks on the corners of the frames, so that the frames are held firmly, and can be moved only back and sidewise. In looking at the bees we can separate the combs at once, at any place. The chamber can be enlarged or diminished simply by adding or withdrawing frames. As the hooks are on all four corners of the frames, the frames can be either end back, or either side up. This arrangement, which permits the inversion of the frames, is greatly praised by those who have triedit. It was claimed by the Hetheringtons years ago that by turning these frames bottom up the comb would be fastened above and below, and the bees, in their haste to carry the honey from the bottom of the frames, would rush at once into the sections. Boards with iron hooks close the side of the brood cavity, while a cloth covers the frames. The entrance (Fig. 100, e) is cut in the bottom-board, as already explained, except that the lateral edges are kept parallel. A strip of sheet-iron (Fig. 100, d) is tacked across this, on which rest the ends of the front end-bars of the frames which stand above, and underneath which pass the bees as they come to and go fromthe hive. A box, without bottom and with movable top, covers all, leaving a space from four to six inches above and on all sides between it and the frames. This gives chance to pack with chaff in winter, and for side and top storing in sections in summer. The Bingham hive (Fig. 101) is not only remarkably sim- ple, but is as remarkable for its shallow depth, the frames being only five inches high. ‘These have no bottom-bar. The end-bars are one and a half inches wide, and the top-bar square. The nails that hold the end-bars pass into the end of OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 237 the top-bar, which is usually placed diagonally, so that an edge, not a face, is below; though some are made with a face below (Fig. 101, £), to be used when comb is transferred. The frames are held together by two wires, one at each end. Each wire (Fig. 101, a) is a little longer than twice the width of the hive when the maximum number of frames are used. The ends of each wire are united and placed about nails (Fig. 101, 6,6) in the ends of the boards (Fig. 101 c,c) which form the sides of the brood-chamber. A small stick (Fig. 101, a) spreads Fic. 101. IS Frames and Bottom-Board of the Bingham Hive—From A. I. Root Co. these wires, and brings the frames close together. A box without bottom and with movable cover, is placed about the frames. Thisislarge and high enough to permit of chaff packing in winter and spring. The bottom-board may be made like the one already described. Mr. Bingham does not bevel the bottom-board, but places lath under three sides of the brood-chamber, the lath being nailed to the bottom-board. He uses the Langstroth blocks to contract the entrance (Fig. 101, g). The advantages of this hive are simplicity, great space above for surplus frames or boxes, capability of being placed one hive above another to any height desired, while the frames may be reversed, end for end, or bottom for top, or the whole brood-chamber turned upside down. Thus, by doubling, we may have a depth of ten inches for winter. It will be seen at once that this hive possesses all the advantages claimed for the new Heddon and Shuck hives, except the frames are not held so securely. Yetitis far more simple, which is greatly in its favor. 238 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; The objections which I have found in the use of such hives are the fact that so few usethem, and danger of killing bees in rapid handling. They can be manipulated with rapidity if we care not how many bees we crush. It hurts meto killa bee, and soI find the Langstroth style more quickly manipu- lated. Mr. Snow, too, who was the first to make the above style of hive, has discarded it in favor of the Langstroth. His objection to the above, is the fact that the various combs are not sure to be so built as tobe interchangeable. Yet that such apiarists as those above named prefer these Huber hives, after long use of the other style, is certainly not without significance. OBSERVATORY HIVE. To study bees while they are at work, requires a hive so constructed that we can look in upon all the bees of the hive Fic. 102. Observatory Hive.—Original. at pleasure. For this purpose I haveused a small Langstroth hive (Fig. 102) containing one frame. Glass is used each side of ‘the frame, and this is shaded by doors hung on hinges. We are able to look at the bees or make all dark inside at pleasure. To prevent the hive from becoming too crowded, we must every twenty-three or twenty-four days shake the bees from the OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 239 frame, and replace the latter with another frame, which shall contain no brood. From sucha hive, in my study window, I have received much pleasure and information. APPARATUS FOR PROCURING COMB HONEY. Although I feel sure that extracted honey will grow more and more in favor, yet it will never supersede the beautiful comb, which, from its exquisite flavor and attractive appear- ance, has always been, and always will be, admired and desired. So, nohive is complete without its arrangement of section frames and cases, all constructed with the view of securing this delectable comb honey in the form that will be most tempting to the eye and palate. SURPLUS COMB HONEY IN SECTIONS. Honey in several-pound boxes is no longer marketable, and is now almost wholly replaced by comb honey in sections. In fact, there is no apparatus for securing comb honey that promises so well as these sections. That they are just the thing to enable us to tickle the market is shown by their rapid growth in popular favor. Some years ago I predicted, at one of our State conventions, that they would soon replace boxes, and was laughed at. Nearly all who then laughed, now use these sections. They are cheap, and with their use we can get more honey, and in a form that will make it irresistible. The wood should be white, the size small—two-pound sec- tions are as large as the market wlll tolerate. One-pound sections are more salable, andin some markets even one-half pound sections are best of all. Of late, Mr. W. Harmer, of Manistee, Mich., is making and using successfully a two- ounce section. Thisis very neatandcheap. It is madeofa shaving, andis glued. Such sections would be the thing to sellat fairs. ‘The size of the sections has nothing to do with the amount of honey secured, and so the market and extra cost should guide the apiarist in this matter. As early as 1877 I used veneer sections, which were essen- tially the same as the one-piece sections now so popular. After this I used nailed sections. At present only the very neatest sections can catch the market, and so we must buy our 240 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; sections of those who can make them by machinery neater and cheaper than we possibly can by hand. Dr. C. C. Miller, James Heddon, and many others, prefer sections made as are children’s toy blocks—the sides fastened by a sort of mortise and tenon arrangement (Fig. 103). These are preferred, as they do not have the shoulder of the one- Fic. 103. Dovetailed Section.—From A. I. Root Co. piece section. They are objected to from the longer time re- quired to put the pieces together, and their lack of rigidity when together, so that they are likely to get out of shape. The Wheeler section—invented and patented by Mr. Geo. T. Wheeler, of Mexico, N. Y., in 1870—is remarkable for being Fic. 104. One-Pound Section.—From A. I. Root Co. Fic. 105. es —— a Prize Section.—From A. I. Root Co. the first to be used with tinseparators. Instead of making the bottoms narrower for a passage, Mr. Wheeler made an open- ing in the bottom. Another style of section, termed the one-piece section (Fig. 104), is, as its name implies, made of a single piece of wood, OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 241 with three cross cuts so that it can be easily bent into a square. The fourth angle unites by notches and projections, as before described. ‘These one-piece sections are now, I think, the favorites among bee-keepers. I prefer these to the dovetailed. They are quickly and safely bent, if dampened slightly before bending, and are firm when in shape foruse. Dr. Miller wets these quickly by pouring hot water at the to be corners while they are yetin the package. They must be even in the pack. If, as argued by Messrs. Dadant, Foster and Tinker, the sec- tions open on all sides are superior, then we must perforce use these one-piece sections, rather than the dovetailed. This last desirable feature is best secured in the plain section (Fig. 106), so-called in distinction from the bee-space Fic. 106. Plain Sections in Super, Showing Frame-Holders and Fence. —From A, I, Root Co. or bee-way sections just described. These are like the ends of the one-piece section all around (Fig. 106); that is, the bottom and top are not cut out to form bee-spaces. These plain sec- tions give free communication, and thus are more readily filled, andas the honey projects to the very edge they look neater (Fig. 108). Of course, there is less wood thanin the bee-space sections, and all edges are even. They are more easily and quickly scraped to remove propolis, etc. They are 242 THE BEK-KEEPER’S GUIDE; rapidly growing in favor. These are used with ‘‘fences,’’ to be described, and in the ordinary supers (Fig. 106). Heretofore there have been two prevailing sizes of sec- tions in use in the United States—the prize section (Fig. 105), which is five and one-fourth by six and one-fourth inches, and the one-pound section (Fig. 104), which is four and one-fourth inches square. The latter is coming rapidly to the front, as Fic. 107. Plain Sections in Super; Showing Fence.—From A. I. Root Co. honey in it sells more readily than if in a larger section. Even half-pound sections have taken the lead in the Boston and Chicago markets. It is barely possible that these small sections will rule generally in the markets of the future. They would often sell more readily, and are far better to ship, as the combs will seldom if ever break from the sections. If, in arranging our sections, we desire to have them oblong, we would better ' make them so that they will be longestup and down. Mr. D. A. Jones finds that if so made they are filled and capped much sooner (Fig. 108). Captain J. E. Hetherington prefers the oblong section, being one which is three and seven-eighths by fiveinches. Mr. Danzenbaker uses one which is four by five inches. He thinks honey in such sections (Fig. 108) sells fora higher price. In the depth of the section, which fixes the thickness of the comb, a change from the common style seems to be desirable. Heretofore they have been generally made two inches deep. With such sections we must use separators to secure perfect combs. Dr. Miller uses separators, and pre- fers a depth of one and five-sevenths, or two inches. By reducing the depth to from one and three-eighths to one and CX, MANUAL OF THH APIARY. 243 three-fourths inches, the expense of separators is found by some to be unnecessary. In feeding back to have sections completed, or where each section is removed as soon as capped, separators are indispensable. While I have never succeeded satisfactorily without separators—as the sections of comb would not be regular enough to ship well—yet I prefer the depth of my sections to be one and five-sevenths inches, or seven to the foot. These hold about three-fourths of a pound. I now believe that the best section for to-day is one four and one-quarter inches square and one and five-sevenths inches in Fic. 108. Aa X 4/4 Oblong and Square Sections.—From A. I. Root Co. depth. We secure nicer comb forthe table, with the thinner combs, and more bees are ableto work on a super or frame of sections, so that the foundation is more speedily drawn out. While a little more honey might be secured in two-pound sec- tions, the market would, I think, make their use undesirable. Of course, any decided change in the form and size of our sec- tions involves no stnall expense, as it requires that the supers 244 THE BER-KERPER’S GUIDE; or frames for holding the sections should also be changed. Often, however, by a little planning we can vary the form so as to reduce the size, without necessitating this expense. HOW TO PLACK SECTIONS IN POSITION. There are two methods, each of which is excellent, and has, as it well may, earnest advocates—one by use of frames, the other by supers. © SECTIONS IN FRAMES. Frames for holding sections (Fig. 109) are made the same size as the frames in the brood-chamber. The depth of the Fic. 109. Gallup Section-Frame.—Original. frame, however, is the same as the depth of the sections. The bottom-bar is three-eighths of an inch narrower than the remainder of the frame, so that when two frames are side by side, ‘there is three-eighths of an inch space between the bot- tom-bars, though the top and side pieces are close together. In case sections are used that are open on all sides, then the ends of the section-frames must also be narrow. I should fear such an arrangement would be objectionable from the amount of propolis that would be used by the bees to make all secure. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 245 The sections are of such a size (Fig. 110) that four, six or nine, etc., will just fill one of the large frames. Nailed to one side of each large frame are two tin, or thin wooden, strips (Fig. 110, ¢, 2) in case separators are to be used, as long as the frame, and as wide into one inch as are the sections. These are tacked half aninch from the top and the bottom of the Fic. 110. Gallup Frame with Sections, —Original. large frames, and so are opposite the sections, thus permitting the bees to pass readily from one tier of sections to another, as do the narrower top and bottom bars of the sections, from those below to those above. Captain Hetherington tells me that Mr. Quinby used these many years ago. It is more trouble to make these frames if we have the tins set in so as just to come flush with the edge of the end-bars of the frames, but then the frames would hang close together, and would not be so stuck together with propolis. These may be hung in the second story of a two-story hive, and just enough to fill the same—my hives will take nine—or they can be put below, beside the brood-combs. Mr. Doolittle, in case he hangs these below, inserts a perforated division-board, so that the queen will not enter the sections and lay eggs. 246 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; The perforated-zinc division-board (Fig. 92) would serve admirably for this purpose. A honey-board (Fig. 91) of the same material keeps sections, either in supers or frames, that are above the hive, neat, and also keeps the queen from enter- ing them. ‘The workers enter just as freely. In long hives, the ‘‘ New Idea’’—which, though I would not use, nor advise any one else to use, I have found quite sat- isfactory, after several years’ trial, especially for extracted honey—I have used these frames of sections, and with good success. The Italians enter them at once, and fill them even more quickly than other bees fill the sectionsin the upper story. In fact, one great advantage of these sections in the frames is the obvious and ample passageways, inviting the Fic. 111. Langstroth Frame with One-Pound Sections.—From A. I. Root Co. bees to enter them. But in our desire to make ample and invit- ing openings, caution is required that wedo not overdo the matter, and invite the queen to injurious intrusion. So we have Charybdis and Scylla, and must, by study, learn so to steer between as to avoid both dangers. Mr. Jones finds that by using the division-board made of perforated-zinc (Fig 92), the queen is kept from the sections, and they can be safely placed in one end of the body of the hive. Figure 111 shows a Langstroth frame full of one-pound sections. As already stated, Mr. Heddon recommends the use of one-story wide-frames, with separators, and so madeas to admit of inversion (Fig. 93). At first I used these deep frames exclusively. The great objection to them is the daubing with propolis, and difficulty of removing the sections from the wide OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 247 frames. This has led me to replace the wide frames by the more convenient and desirable section-case or crate. CRATES OR, RACKS. These (Fig. 112) are to be usedin lieu of large frames, to hold sections, and are very convenient, as we can use one tier Fic. 112. Crate for Sections.—Original. at first, and asthe harvest advances tier up, or “‘ storify,”’ as our British friends would say, until we may use three, or even 7 Fic. 113. L Super.—From A. I. Root Co. four, tiers of sections on a single hive. I think this far the best arrangement for securing comb honey. Southard and Ranney, of Kalamazoo, have long used a very neat rack, as seen in Fig. 112. 248 THE BEH-KEEPER’S GUIDE; It will be seen that the Heddon case (Fig. 93), already described (page 225) as a part of the Heddon-Langstroth hive, is only a modification of the Southard crate. This crate does not permit the use of separators. The case or super preferred and used by Dr. C. C. Miller (Fig. 113) is one with | shaped tin supports, on which rest the sections. This is just like the Heddon case, except the parti- tions are omitted. Projecting tin strips are tacked on the bot- tom of the sides as wellas ends. These strips on the ends help hold the end rows of sections, while those on the sides hold the | shaped tins, which in turn support the sections. As the vertical part of the | supports the separator, it should not be more than one-half inch high. As most of us use—must use—separators, this is probably one of the best section-honey Fic. 114. Hilton T Super.—From A, I. Root Co. cases for us, and so one of the best arrangements for securing comb honey. Mr. Hilton (Fig. 114), of Michigan, does not like the movable | supports, and so he omits the projecting tin pieces, and tacks the 4 tins at the endsto the bottom of the side of the case. Mr. Heddon has a case (Fig. 93) which permits inversion, through the use of wide frames and thumb-screws. Still another method to support sections (Fig. 115) has many advo- cates. The case is like the one used with the | tins, but has ‘ projecting tin supports tacked to the ends only. On these rest OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 249 plain frames with no top-bar (Fig. 115), which in turn support the sections. If bee-space sections are used, then the bottom- bar of these frame-supports must have bee-ways or spaces cut Fic. 115. SE == Dovetailed Super with Frames and Section-holders.—From A. I. Root Co. D Wooden Separator. £ Sections with Foundation Starters. in them. These are also used to hold the plain sections (Fig. 106), in which case, as the fence (Fig. 116) always used with these sections furnishes a bee-way, the frames, like the sec- tions, are entirely plain. Of course, separators can be used with these supports, in case we use the bee-space sections. Fic. 116. Fence for Plain Sections.—From A, I. Root Co. FENCES. The fence is simply a slatted separator made by nailing three boards (Fig. 116) three-sixteenths of an inch apart to end posts, which project three-eighths of an inch below the lowest , 250 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; board; cross-pieces of the same thickness as the corner posts, three-sixteenths of an inch, are like the corner posts nailed on each side connecting the boards of the fence. They do not reach below the lowest board. Thus, these fences permit very free communication (Figs. 106, 107). The whole distance at the bottom of the sections has a wide bee-way which also reaches part way up the ends. Of course, the cross-pieces are exactly opposite the ends of the sections which they separate. As these separators have spaces, they give ample connection between sections, and favor rapid comb-building and honey- storing. Fences are also placed outside the last row of sec- tions. They secure added warmth by the double wall of bees, and so better filled sections. No wonder that these plain sec- tions and fences are rapidly coming into use. ‘Their use, of course, necessitates the use of cases with frames having no top-bars to hold the sections and fences (Fig. 106). If we discard separators the old Heddon case is excellent; if we must use separators then the case with | shaped tin supports is perhaps the best in the market. Theplain sections are so admirable that they will be largely used; then the frame supports must be used. In any casea follower (Fig. 115, D) should be used to crowd the sections with separators close together. This may be pushed by use of a thumb-screw (Fig. 114), wedge, or steel spring. Mr. Adam Grimm once wrote that boxes above the hive should not be closely covered. As already stated, Mr. Heddon puts no close cover over his sections. Mr. Hasty is pleased with simply a cloth, cheap muslin, above his sections, and a board cover to protect from rains. Such ventilation of the sections is scientific as well as practical. All apiarists who desire to work for comb honey that will sell, will certainly use the sections, and adjust them by use of either frames or cases. Each method has its friends, though I think cases or supers are justly taking the lead. SEPARATORS. These may be of woodor tin. While the tin were first used, and do work well, the wood seem to be growing in favor, and seem likely wholly to replace the tin. The wood are poorer OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 251 conductors of heat, and also give a foothold for the bees, both of which are desirable qualities. FOOT-POWER SAW. Every apiarist, who keeps only a few bees, will find, if he makes his own hives. a foot-power saw very valuable. I have used, with great satisfaction, the admirably combined foot- power saw of W. F. & John BarnesCo. It permits rapid work, Fic. 117. i ; Wy tt Mi) ee ; ue Horse-Power.—From A. I. Root Co, insures uniformity, and enables the apiarist to give a finish to his work that would rival that of the cabinet-maker. Those who procure such a machine should learn to file and set the saw,and should ever run the machine when not in perfect order. When just beginning the business it will generally be wise to secure a fully equipped hive of some bee-keeper or dealer in supplies. If there is a hive factory near at hand, it may pay to buy all hives ready made ; otherwise high freights may make thisunprofitable, If a person wishes to manufacture 252 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; hives by the score, either for himself or others, even the foot- power saw willsoon become tooslow and wearying. In this case some use wind-power, which is too uncertain to give full satisfaction ; others use horse-power, and still others procure a small steam-engine. Mr. M. H. Hunt, a very thoughtful apiarist, uses a very con- venient horse-power (Fig. 117). The large wheel is fifteen feet in diameter, the horse is inside the rim, and the band consists Fic. 118. Saw-Table.—From A. I, Root Co. of a chain, that it may not slip. To get the horse in position, the wheel is simply lowered. I have used a tread-power which pleases me much. It is safe, can be used under shelter, and if one has colts or young horses it serves well to quiet them. As gasoline engines are now so cheap, and convenient; and as crude oil for steam en- gines is so cheap, such engines will generally be preferred when one’s business is at all extensive. In case we use other than foot or hand power, our saw-table must be firm and heavy. The one illustrated here (Fig. 118) is recommended by Mr. A. I. Root. OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 253 CHAPTER VIL POSITION AND ARRANGEMENT OF APIARY. As it is desirable to have our apiary grounds so fixed as to give the best results, and as this costs some money and more labor, it should be done once for all. As plan and execution in this direction must needs precede even the purchase of bees, this subject deserves an early consideration. Hence, we will proceed to consider position, arrangement of grounds, and preparation for each individual colony. POSITION. Of course, it is of the first importance that the apiary be near at hand. In city or village this is imperative. In the country, or at suburban homes, we have more choice, but close proximity to the house is of much importance. In a city it may be necessary to follow Mr. Muth’s example, and locate on the house-tops, where, despite the inconvenience, we may achieve success. The lay of the ground is not important, though, if a hill, it should not be very steep. It may slope in any direction, but better any way than toward the north. Of course, each hive should stand perfectly level. ARRANGEMENT OF GROUNDS. Unless sandy, these should be well drained. If a grove offers inviting shade, accept it, but trim high to avoid damp. Such a grove could soon be formed of basswood and tulip trees, which, as we shall see, are very desirable, as their bloom offers plenteous and most delicious honey. Even Virgil urged shade of palm and olive, also that. we screen the bees from winds. Wind-screens are very desirable, especially on the windward side. Such ascreen may be formed of a tall board fence, which, if it surrounds the grounds, will also serve to protect against thieves. Yet theseare gloomy and forbidding, 254 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; and will be eschewed by the apiarist who has an eye to esthetics. Evergreen screens, either of Norway spruce, Austrian or other pine, or arbor vite, each or all are not only very effective, but are quickly grown, inexpensive, and add greatly to the beauty of the grounds. In California eucalyp- tus is very desirable shade. The species grow vigorously, stand drouth, and if wisely selected afford much honey. Such a fence or hedge is also very desirable if the bees are neara street or highway. It not only shuts the bees away, as it were, but it so directs their flight upward that they will not trouble passers-by. If the apiary is large, a small, neat, inex- pensive house in the center of the apiary grounds is indispen- sable. This will serve in winter as a shop for making hives, frames, etc., and as a store-house for honey, while in summer it will be used for extracting, transferring, storing, bottling, etc. In building this, it will be well to construct a frost-proof, thoroughly drained, dark and well-ventilated cellar. (See Chapters XVIII and XIX.) PREPARATION FOR EACH COLONY. Virgil was right in recommending shade for each colony. Bees are forced to cluster outside the hive, if the bees are sub- jected to the full force of the sun’s rays. By the intense heat the temperature inside becomes like that of an oven, and the wonder is that they do not desert entirely. I have known hives, thus unprotected, to be covered with bees, idling outside, when, by simply shading the hives, all would go merrily to work. The combs, too, and foundation especially, are liable, in unshaded hives, to melt and fall down, which is very dam- aging to the bees, and very vexatious to the apiarist. The remedy for all this is always to have the hives so situated that they will be entirely shaded all through the heat of the day. This might be done, as in the olden time, by constructing a shed or house, but these are expensive and very inconvenient, and, therefore, to be discarded. If the aiarist has a convenient grove this may be trimmed high, so as not to be damp, and will fulfill every requirement. So arrange the hives that while they are shaded through all the heat of the day, they will receive the sun’s rays early and OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 255 late, and thus the bees will work more hours. I always face my hives tothe east. Sucha grove is also very agreeable to the apiarist who often must work all the day in the hottest Fic. 119, 5 ap — Nucleus and Simplicity Hive Shaded by Grape-vine.—From A. I. Root Co. sunshine. If no grove is at command, the hives may be placed on the north of a Concord grape-vine (Fig. 119), or other vig- orous variety, as the apiarist may prefer. This should be 256 THE BEE-KEHPER’S GUIDE; trained to a trellis, which may be made by setting two posts, either of cedar or oak. Let these extend four or five feet above the ground, and be three or four feet apart. Two or three supporting arms of narrow boards can be nailed at right angles to a single post on which to train the vines, or we may connect them at intervals of eighteen inches with three gal- vanized wires, the last one being at thetop of the posts. Thus we can have shade and grapes, and can see for ourselves that bees do not injure grapes. These should be at least six feet apart. A. I. Root’s idea of having the vine of each succeeding row divide the spaces of the previous row, in quincunx order (Fig. 120), is very good ; thoughI should prefer the rows in this case to be four instead of three feet apart. I have tried grape- vines and evergreens to shade hives, and do not like them. They are too much in the way. UnlessI can have a grove trimmed high up I much prefer a simple shade-board as already suggested. This is simply a wide board nailed to the edge of two cross-boards, which are about fourinches wide. I make these eighteen inches wide by two feet long. I have some even larger. If one cross-board is a little narrower it gives a slant that insures a rapid removal of the waterin arain. I have never known these shade-boards to blow off. Should they do so a second board parallel to the shade-board could be nailed to the cross-boards. A brick placed on this would make all secure. This shade-board is inexpensive, always out of the way, and ready for service. Many apiarists economize by using fruit-trees for shade, which, from their spreading tops, serve well, though often from their low branches they are not pleasant to work under. Mr. Doolittle thinks if hives are painted white shade is unneces- sary. Mr. A. I. Root’s idea of having sawdust under and about the hives has much to recommendit. The objection to sawdust is the danger from fire. I have used sawdust, cement, asphalt, etc. I think on the whole a fine grass lawn kept closely and smoothly mown is as convenient as any plan, and it certainly has taste and beauty to recommendit. If closely mown, one will rarely lose a queen. While ashes or sawdust make a queen walking upon them more conspicuous, I much prefer the beautiful grass plat. OR, MANDUAT, OF THE APTARY. 257 Peake iso ime | te re ee — SS Fia. 120. Grape-Vine Aptary.—From A. I. Root Co. 258 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE} CHAPTER VIL TO TRANSFER BEES. As the-prospective bee-keeper may have purchased his bees in box-hives, barrels, or hollow logs, and so, of course, will desire to transfer them immediately into movable-frame hives, or, asalready suggested, may wish to transfer from one movable-frame to another, I will now proceed to describe the process. : Among the many valuable methods which Mr. Heddon has given to the bee-keeping public, not the least valuable is that of transferring. This method should be used only at or just before the swarming season—the best time to transfer. After blow- ing a little smoke into the hive, sufficient to alarm the bees, we set it a little aside, and put in its place the new hive full of wired foundation. We now turn the old hive, whatever it may be, bottom side up, and place a ‘box over it. If the bees are sufficiently smoked, it will make no difference even if the box is not close-fitting to the old hive. Yet the beginner will feel safer to have it so; and in this case no stinging can take place. We then with a stick or hammer rap onthe hive for from ten to twenty minutes. The bees will fill with honey and go with the queen into the upper box and cluster. If towards the last we carefully set the box off once or twice, and vigorously shake the hive, and then replace the box, we will hasten the emigration of the bees, and make it more complete. I got this last suggestion from Mr. Baldridge. A few young bees will still remain in the old hive, but these will do no harm. We next take the box, which contains the queen and nearly all the bees, and shake the bees all out in front of the hive already placed on the old stand. The bees willat once take possession, draw out, or better, build out, the foundation ina surprisingly short time, and will give us a set of combs which will surpass in beauty those procured in any other way. Should the bees be unable to gather any honey for some days, OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 259 which at this season is not likely to occur, of course we must feed them. We set the old hive aside for twenty-one days, when the young bees will all come from the cells. Should the weather be cold, it might be well to put thisin a warm room, so the brood will not chill. At the time of swarming this will rarely be necessary. We now drum out these bees as before, kill the queen, which has been reared, and unite the bees with the others, or form a separate colony as before, as the number of bees determines. We can now split out the corners of the old hive, split the gum, or separate the staves of the barrel, so as not to break the comb. This should be carefully cut loose, and the honey extracted by use of the wire comb-holder (Fig. 150), and the comb melted into wax for foundation. The only loss in this method is the time which the bees require to build out the foundation, and this is far more than made upin the superior combs which are secured. I think the time expended in melting up the combs, etc., is more than made up by the time saved in transferring. THE OLD METHOD. If one has no foundation, or desires to give the bees the comb and honey at once, even at the cost of less shapely combs, he then should drum the bees out as before, on a warm day when they are busy at work, and put the box containing the bees on the old stand, leaving the edge raised so that the bees which are out may enter, and so all the bees can get air. This method is difficult, except in early spring, and is best done about noon, when the bees are busy on the fruit-bloom. It is not safe to transfer on a hot day, when the bees are idle, as the risks from robbing are too great. If other bees do not trouble, as they usually will not if busily gathering, we can proceed in the open air. If they do, we must go into some room. I have frequently transferred the comb in my kitchen, and often in a barn. Now knock the old hive apart, as already described, cut the combs from the sides, and get the combs out of the old hive with just as little breakage as possible. Mr. Baldridge, if transferring in spring, saws the combs and cross-sticks 260 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; loose from the sides, turns the hive into the natural position, then strikes against the top of the hive with a hammer till the fastenings are broken loose, when he lifts the hive, and the combs are all free and in convenient shape for rapid work. We now need a barrel, seton end, on which we placea board fifteen to twenty inches square, covered with severai thicknesses of cloth. Some apiarists think the cioth useless, but it serves, I think, to prevent injury to comb, brood or honey. We now place a comb on this cloth, and seta frame on the comb, and cut out a piece of the comb the size of the inside of the frame, taking pains to save all the worker-brood. Now crowd the frame over the comb, so that the latter will be in the same position that it was when in the old hive ; that is, so the honey will be above—the position is not very important —then fasten the comb in the frame, by winding about all one or two small wires, or pieces of wrapping-twine. ‘To raise the frame and comb before fastening, raise the board beneath till Fic. 121. Fic, 122. Transferring-Clasp.— From American Bee Journal, Transferred Comb.—From American Bee Journal. the frame is vertical. Set this frame in the new hive, and proceed with the others in the same way till we have all the worker-comb—that with small cells—fastened in. To secure the pieces, which we shall find abundant at the end, take thin pieces of wood, one-half inch wide, and a trifle longer than the frame is deep, place these in pairs either side the comb, extending up and down, and enough to hold the pieces secure till the bees shall fasten them (Fig. 121), and secure the strips by winding with small wire, just below the frame (Fig. 122), or by use of small rubber bands, or else tack them to the frame OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 261 with small tacks. Some bee-keepers use U-shaped pieces of wire or tin to hold the comb in the frame. Captain Hetherington has invented and practices a very neat method of fastening comb into frames. In constructing his frames, he bores small holes through the top, side and bottom bars of his frames, about two inches apart ; these holes are just large enough to permit the passage of the long spines of the hawthorn. Now, in transferring comb, he has but to stick these thorns through into the comb to hold it securely. He can also use all the pieces, and still make a neat and secure frame of comb. He finds this arrangement convenient, too, in strengthening insecure combs. In answer to my inquiry, this gentleman said it paid well to bore such holesin all his frames, which are eleven by sixteen inches, inside measure. I discarded such frames because of the liability of the comb to fall out. Having fastened all the nice worker-comb into the frames —of course, all other comb will be melted into wax—we place all the frames containing brood together in the center of our new hive, especially if the colony is weak, or the weather cool, and confine the space by use of the division-board, adding the other frames as the bees may need them. We now place the new hive on the stand, opening the entrance wide, so that the bees can enter anywhere along the alighting-board. We then shake all the bees from the box, and any young bees that may have clustered on any part of the old hive, or on the flooror ground, where we transferred the comb, immediately in front of the hive. They will enter at once and soon be at work, all the busier for having passed ‘‘from the old house into the new.”? Intwo or three days remove the wires, or strings or sticks, when we shall find the combs all fastened and smoothed off, and the bees as busily engaged as though their present home had always been the seat of their labors. In practicing this method, many proceed at once to trans- fer without drumming out the bees. Inthis case the bees should be well smoked, should be driven, by the use of the smoker, away from the side of the old hive where the combs are being cut loose, and may be brushed direct from the old combs into the new hive. This method will only be preferred 262 * HE BEE-KEEPER'S GUIDE; by the experienced. The beginner will find it more easy and pleasant first to drum out all the bees before he commences to cut out the combs. Of course, in transferring from one frame to another, the matter is much simplified. In this case, after thoroughly smoking the bees, we have but to lift the frames and shake or brush the bees into the new hive. Fora brush, a chicken or turkey wing, a large wing or tail feather from a turkey, goose or peacock, or atwig of pine or bunch of asparagus twigs serves admirably. Cheap and excellent brushes (Fig. 154) are now for sale by all supply-dealers. Now cut out the comb in the best form to accommodate the new frames, and fasten as already suggested. After the combs are alltransferred, shake all remaining bees in front of the new hive, which has already been placed on the stand previously occupied by the old hive. Sometimes bees from trees in the forest are transferred to hives and the apiary. HUNTING BEE-TREES. Except for recreation, this is seldom profitable. It is slow and uncertain work. The tree, when found, is not our own, and though the owner may consent to our cutting it, he may dislike to do so. The bees, when found, are difficult to get alive; itis even more difficult to get the honey in good condition, and, when secured, the honey and bees are often almost worthless. The principle upon which bees are ‘‘lined’”’ is this: That after filling with honey, a bee always takes a direct course— ‘a bee-line ’’—to its hive. To hunt the bee-trees we need a bottle of sweetened water, a little honey-comb, unless the bees are gathering freely from forest flowers, and a small bottom- less box with a sliding glass cover, and a small shelf attached to the middle of one side on the inside of the box. A shallow tray, or piece of honey-comb, is to be fastened to this shelf. If the bees are not found on flowers, we can attract them by burning a piece of honey-comb. If on a flower, set the box over them after turning a little of the sweetened water in the comb or tray on the shelf. It is easy to get them to sipping this sweet. Then slide the glass, and, when they fly, watch OR, MANUAL, OF THE APIARY. 263 closely and see the direction they take. By following this line we come to the bee-tree, or more likely to some neighbor’s apiary. By getting two lines, if the bees are from the same tree, the tree will be where thelines meet. We should be care- ful not to be led to neighboring apiaries, and should look very closely when the bees fly, to be sure of the line. Experience makes a person quite skillful. It need hardly be said that in warm days in winter, when there is snow on the ground, we may often find bee-trees by noting dead bees on the snow, as also the spotting of the snow, as the bees void their feces. When a tree is found, we must use all possible ingenuity to get the combs whole if we wish to transfer the bees. We may cut in and remove the comb; may cut out the section of tree containing the bees and lower this by use of a rope; or we may fellthe tree. In this last case we may make the destruc- tion less complete if we fall the tree on other smaller trees to lessen the jar. 264 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; CHAPTER VII FEEDING AND FEEDERS. As already stated, it is only when the worker-bees are storing that the queen deposits to the full extent of her capa- bility, and that brood-rearing is at its height. In fact, when storing ceases, general indolence characterizes the hive. This is peculiarly true of the German and Italian races of bees. Hence, if we would achieve the best success, we must keep the workers active, even before gathering commences, as also in- the interims of honey-secretion by the flowers; and to do this we must feed sparingly before the advent of bloomin the spring, and whenever the workersare forced to idleness during any part of the season, by the absence of honey-producing flowers. For a number of years I have tried experiments in this direction by feeding a portion of my colonies early in the season, and in the intervals of honey-gathering, and always with marked results in favor of the practice. Ofcourse it is not well to feed unless we expect a honey harvest the same season. Thus, I would not feed after clover or basswood bloom unless I expected a fall harvest. The fact that honey seasons are uncertain, makes the policy of feeding merely to stimulate questionable. Mr. D. A. Jones has truly said that if feeeding in the autumn be deferred too long, till the queen ceases laying, it often takes much time to get her to resume, and not infre- quently we fail entirely. Every apiarist, whether novice or veteran, will often receive ample reward by practicing stimulative feeding early in the season; then his hive at the dawn of the white clover era will be redundant with bees, well filled with brood, and in just the trim to receive a bountiful harvest of this most delicious nectar. pa Feeding is often necessary to secure sufficient stores for OR, MANUAL OF THE APIARY. 265 winter—for no apiarist, worthy of the name, will suffer his faithful, willing subjects to starve, when so little care and expense will prevent it. This is peculiarly true in Southern California, where severe drouths often prevent any harvest, and these may occur on two successive years. If we only wish to stimulate, the amount fed need not be great. Ahalf pounda day, or even less, will be all that is necessary to encourage the bees to active preparation for the good time coming. For information in regard to supplying stores for winter, see Chapter XVIII. Bees, when very active, especially in very warm weather, like most higher animals, need water. ‘This very likely is to. permit evaporation in respiration, and the necessary cooling of the body. At such times bees repair to pool, stream or watering-trough. As with other animals, the addition of salt makes the water more appetizing, and doubtless more valuable. Unless water is near, it always ought to be furnished to bees. Any vessel containing chipsor small pieces of boards to secure against drowning will serve for giving water. In case bees trouble about watering-troughs, a little carbolic acid or kero- sene-oil on the edge of the trough will often send them away. WHAT TO FEED. For this purpose I would feed granulated sugar, reduced to the consistency of honey, or else extracted honey kept over from the previous year. If we use two-thirds syrup and one- third good honey we save all danger of crystallization or granulation. We add the honey when the syrup is hot, and stir. The price of the honey will decide which is the more profitable. The careful experiments of R. L. Taylor show that nearly three times as much honey as syrup will be con- sumed. This argues strongly for the syrup. Dark, inferior honey often serves well for stimulative feeding, and as it is not salable, may well be used in this way. To make the syrup, I use one quart of water to twoof sugar, and heat till the sugar is dissolved. Mr. R. lL. Taylor first boils the water, hen stirs in the sugar till all boils, when l:2 says it will not granulate even with no acid added. This also removes all danger of burning the syrup, which must never be done. By 266 THE BEE-KEEPER’S GUIDE; stirring till all the sugar is dissolved we may make the syrup without any heat. We use equal parts of sugar and water, and may easily stir by using the honey extractor. We putin the water and add the sugar as weturn the machine. A little tartaric acid—an even teaspoonful to fifteen pounds of syrup— or evena little extracted honey, will also prevent crystalliza- tion. If fed warm in early spring it is all the better. Many advise feedin the poorer grades of sugar in spring. My own experience makes me question the policy of ever using such feed for bees. The feeding of glucose or grape sugar is even worse policy. It is bad food for the bees, and its use is dangerous to the bee-keeper’s reputation, and injurious to our brother bee-keepers. Glucose is so coupled with fraud and adulteration that he who would ‘‘avoid the appearance of evil”? must let it severely alone. In all feeding, unless extracted honey is what we are using, we can not exercise too great care that such feed is not carried to the surplus boxes. Only let our customers once taste sugar in their comb honey, and not only is our own repu- tation gone, but the whole fraternity is injured. In case we wish to have our combs in the sections filled or capped, we must feed extracted honey, which may often be done with great advantage. I have often fed extracted honey back to the bees, after the honey-flow ceased, when it would be quickly stored in the sections. More frequently, however, I have utterly failed of success. HOW TO FEED. The requisites of a good feeder are: Cheapness, a form to” admit quick feeding, to permit no loss of heat, and so arranged that we can feed at all seasons without in any way disturbing the bees. The feeder (Fig. 123), which I haye used with good satisfaction, isa modified division-board, the top-bar of which (Fig. 123, 6) is two inches wide. From the upper central por- tion, beneath the top-bar, a rectangular piece the size of an oyster-can is replaced with an oyster-can (Fig. 123, g), after the top of the latter has been removed.