ALBERT R. MANN LIBRARY AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924073898920 Production Note Cornell University Library produced this volume to replace the irreparably deteriorated original. It was scanned at 600 dots per inch resolution and compressed prior to storage using CCITT/ITU Group 4 compression. The digital data were used to create Cornell's replacement volume on paper that meets the ANSI Standard Z39.48- 1992. The production of this volume was supported by the United States Department of Education, Higher Education Act, Title II-C. Scanned as part of the A. R. Mann Library ‘project to preserve and enhance access to the Core Historical Literature of the Agricultural Sciences. Titles included in this collection are listed in the volumes published by the Cornell University Press in the series The Literature of the Agricultural Sciences, 1991-1996, Wallace C. Olsen, series editor. AMERICAN POMOLOGY. APPLES. BY DOCT. JOHN A. WARDER, PRESIDENT OHIO POMOLOGICAL SOCIETY; VICE-PRESIDENT AMERICAN POMOLOGJCAL SOCIETY, ETC, 290 ILLUSTRATIONS. NEW YORK: ORANGE JUDD AND COMPANY. 245 BROADWAY. “CORNELL UNIVERSITY \ LIBRARY » Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year 1867, by ORANGE JUDD & CO., A‘ the Clerk’s Office of the District. Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Lovrsoy & Son, Electrotypers and Stereotypers, 45 Vandewater St., N.Y. PREFACH. ee All patriots may realize a sense of pride, when they consider the capabilities of the glorious country in which we are favored to live; and while fostering no sectional feelings, nor pleading any local interests, yet, as Americans and as men, we may be allowed to love our own homes, our own neighborhoods, our States and regions; and we may be permitted to think them the brightest and best portions of the great Republic to which we all belong. Therefore the writer asks to be excused for expressing a preference for his own favored Northwest, and while claim- ing all praise for this noble expanse, he wishes still to be acknowledged as most devotedly an American CiT1IzEN, who feels the deepest interest in the prosperity of the whole country. His fellow-laborers in the extensive field of Horticul- ture, who are scattered over the great Northwest, having called upon him for a work on fruits which should be adapted to their wants, the author has for several years devoted himself to the task of collecting materials from which he is preparing a work upon AmzRican Pomotocy, of which this is to be the first volume. The title has been adopted as the most appropriate, be- cause the book is intended to be truly American in its character, and, though it may be especially adapted to the wants of the Western States, great pains have been taken Iv PREFACE. to make it a useful companion to the orchardists of all portions of our country. When examining this volume, his friends are asked to look gently upon the many faults they may find, and they are requested also to observe the peculiarities by which this fruit book is characterized. Much to his regret, the author found that it was considered necessary to the com- pleteness of the volume, that the general subject of fruit- growing should be treated in detail, and, therefore, intro- ductory chapters were prepared; whereas, he had set out simply to describe the fruits of our country. To this necessity, as it was considered by his friends, the author yielded reluctantly, because he felt that this labor had al- ready been thoroughly done by his predecessors, whose volumes were to be seen in the houses of all intelligent fruit-growers. From them he did not wish to borrow other men’s ideas and language, and therefore undertook to write the whole anew, without any reference to printed books. But, of course, it is impossible to be original in treating such familiar and hackneyed topics as those which are discussed at every meeting of horticulturists all over the country, and which form the subject of the familiar discourse of the green-house and nursery, the potting-shed and the grafting-room, the garden and the orchard. After the introductory chapters upon the general or leading topics connected with frvit-culture and orcharding, the reader will find that especial attention has been paid to the classification of the fruits under consideration in this volume. Classification is the great need of our po- mology, and, indeed, it is almost a new idea to many American readers, The author has fully realized the dif- PREFACE, Vv ficulties attendant upon the undertaking, but its impor- tance, and its growing necessity, were considered sufficient to warrant the attempted innovation. It is hoped that American students of pomolovy will appreciate the efforts which have been made in their behalf. The formul which have been adopted may not prove to be the best, but it is believed that they will render great assistance to those who desire to identify fruits; and that, at least, they may lead to a more perfect classification in the future. On the contrary, with these simple formule, under which the fruits are arranged, the student has only to de- cide as to which of the sub-divisions his specimen must be referred, and then seek among a limited number for the description that shall correspond to his fruit, and the iflen- tification is made out. In the systematic descriptions of fruits, the alphabetical succession of the names is used in each sub-division. An earnest endeavor has been made to be minute in the de- tails without becoming prolix. A regular order is adopt- ed for considering the several parts, and some new or un- usual characters are brought into requisition to aid in the identification. Some of these characters appear to have\ been strangely overlooked by previous pomologists, though they are believed to be permanent and of consid- erable value in the diagnosis. In deciding upon the selection of the names of fruits, the generally received rules of our Pomological Societies have been departed from in a few instances, where good reasons were thought to justify differing from the authorities. Thus, when a given name has been generally adopted over © a large extent of country, though different from that used VI PREFACE, by a previous writer, it has been selected as the title of the fruit in this work. To avoid incumbering the pages, authorities for the nomenclature have not been cited, except in a few in- stances, nor have numerous synonyms been introduced. Such only as are in common use have been given, and those of foreign origin have been dropped. The attention of the reader is particularly directed to the catalogue of fruits near the close of the volume, which also answers as the index to those which are described in detail. This portion of the work has cost an immense amount of labor and time, and, though making little dis- play, will, it is hoped, prove very useful to the orchardist. In it the names of fruits are presented in their alphabeti- cal order, followed by information as to the average size, the origin of the variety, its classification, from which are deduced its shape, flavor and modes of coloring; next is noted its season, and then its quality. This last character 18, of course, but the result of private judgment, and the estimate may differ widely from that of others; the qual- ity, too, it should be remembered, is here intended to be the result of a consideration of many properties besides that of mere flavor. This catalogue will furnish a great deal of information respecting the fruits it embraces. Unfortunately, it is not so full nor so complete as it should be, but it is offered as the result of many years’ observations, and is submitted for what it is worth. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.—It is but an act of common jus- tice for an author to acknowledge his indebtedness to those who havo~ad_him i in his, labors, especially where, from PREFACE, vn the nature of the investigations, so much material -has to be drawn from extrinsic sources. Upon the present occa- sion, instead of an extended parade of references to the productions of other writers, which might-be looked upon as rather pedantic, it is preferred to make a general acknowledgment of the important assistance derived from many pomological authors of our own country and of Europe. Quotations are credited on the pages where they occur. But the writer is also under great obligations to a host of co-laborers for the assistance they have kindly rendered him in the collecting, and in the examination and identifi- cation of fruits.. Such friends he has happily found wher- ever he has turned in the pursuit of these investigations, and there are others whom it has never been his good for- tune to meet face to face. To name them all would be impossible. The contemplation of their favors sadly re- calls memories of the departed, but it also revives pleasant associations of the bright spirits that are still usefully en- gaged in the numerous pomological and horticultural asso- ciations of our country, which have become important agencies in the diffusion of valuable information in this branch of study. To all of his kind friends the author returns his sincere thanks. With a feeling of hesitation in coming before the pub- lic, but satisfied that he has made a contribution to the fund of human knowledge, this volume is presented to the Horticulturists of our country, for whom it was prepared by their friend and fellow-laborer, Aston, January 1, 1867. JNO. A. WARDER. INTRODUCTION. IMPORTANCE OF ORCHARD PRODUCTS—GOVERNMENT SsTATISTICS ~ GREAT VALUE OF ORCHARD AND GARDEN PRODUCTS — DELIGHTS OF FRUIT CULTURE — TEMPERATE REGIONS THE PROPER FIELD FOR FRUIT CULTURE, AS FOR MENTAL DEVELOPMENT — PLANTS OF CUL- TURE, PLANTS OF NATURE— NOMADIC CONDITION UNFAVORABLE FOR TERRA-CULTURE — NECESSITIES OF AN INCREASING POPULA- TION A SPUR—HIGH CIVILIZATION DEMANDS HIGH CULTURE — HORTICULTURE A FINE ART, THE POETRY OF THE FARMER’S LIFE — MORAL INFLUENOES OF FRUIT-CULTURE — SINGULAR LEGISLATION RESPECTING PROPERTY IN FRUIT—INFLUENOE UPON HEALTH — APPLES IN BREAD-MAKING; AS FOOD FOR STOCK — SOURQES AND ROUTES OF INTRODUCTION — AGENCY OF NURSERYMEN — INDIAN ORCHARDS — FRENOH SETTLERS — JOHNNY APPLE-SEED — VARIETIES OF FRUITS, LIKE MAN, FOLLOW PARALLELS OF LATITUDE — LOCAL VARIETIES OF MERIT TO BE CHERISHED— OHIO PURCHASE — SILAS WHARTON Ss THE PUTNAM LIST. Few persons have any idea of the great value and im- portance of the products of our orchards and fruit-gardens. These are generally considered the small things of agri- culture, and are overlooked by all but the statist, whose business it is to deal with these minutiz, to hunt them up, to collocate them, and when he combines these various de- tails and produces the sum total, we are all astonished at the result. 1* 10 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. Our government wisely provides for the gathering of statistics at intervals of ten years, and some of the States also take an account of stock and production at interme- diate periods, some of them, like Ohio, have a permanent statician who reports annually to the Governor of the State. Our Boards of Trade publish the amounts of the lead- ing articles that arrive at and depart from the principal cities, and thus they furnish us much additional informa- tion of value. Besides this, the county assessors are sometimes directed to collect statistics upon certain points of interest, and now that we all contribute toward the ex- tinction of the national debt, the United States Assessors in the several districts:are put in possession of data, which should be very correct, in regard to certain productions that are specified by act of Congress as liable to taxation. By these several means we may have an opportunity of learning from time to time what are the productions of the country, and their aggregate amounts are surprising to most of us. When they relate to our special interests, they are often very encouraging. This is particularly the case with those persons who have yielded to the popular prejudice that cotton was the main agricultural production of the United States; to such it will be satisfactory to learn that the crop of corn, as reported in the last census, is of nearly equal value, at the usual market prices of each article. Fruit-growers will be encouraged to find that the value of orchard products, according to the same returns, was nearly twenty millions, that of Ohio being nearly one million; of New York, nearly three and three-quarters millions; that the wine crop of the United States, an in- INTRODUCTION. ll terest that is still in its infancy, amounted to nearly three and one-quarter millions; and that the valuation of mar- ket-garden products sums up to more than sixteen millions of dollars’ worth. It is to be regretted that for our present purpose, the data are not sufficiently distinct to enable us to ascertain the relative value of the productions of our orchards of apples, pears, peaches, quinces, and the amount and value of the small fruits, as they are termed, since these are variously grouped in the returns of the census takers, and cannot now be separated. Of their great value, however, we may draw our conclusions from sep- arate records that have been kept and reported by indi- viduals, who assert the products of vineyards in some cases to have been as high as three thousand dollars per acre; of strawberries, at one thousand dollars; of pears, at one hundred dollars per tree, which would be four thousand dollars per acre; of apples, at twenty-five bush- els per tree, or one thousand bushels per acre, which, at fifty cents per bushel, would produce five hundred dollars. But, leaving this matter of dollars and cents, who will portray for us the delights incident to fruit-culture? They are of a quiet nature, though solid and enduring. They carry us back to the early days of the history of our race, when “the Lord God planted a garden eastward in Eden ..-... and out of the ground made the Lord God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food...... and the Lord God took the man and put him into the garden of Eden, to dress it and to keep it.” We are left to infer that this dressing and keeping of the gar- den was but a light and pleasant occupation, unattended with toil and trouble, and that in their natural condition 12 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. the trees and plants, unaided by culture, yielded food for man. Those were paradisean times, the days of early in- nocence, when man, created in the image of his Maker, was still obedient to the divine commands; but, after the great transgression, everything was altered, the very ground was cursed, “thorns and thistles shall it bring forth to thee, and thou shalt eat of the herb of the field. In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread.” that day to the present hour it has been the lot of man to struggle with difficulties in the cultivation of the soil, and he has been driven to the necessity of constant watchful- From ness and care to preserve and to improve the various fruits of the earth upon which he subsists. In the tropics, it is true, there are many vegetable productions which are adapted for human food, even in a state of nature, and there we find less necessity for the effort of ingenuity and the application of thought and labor to produce a subsist- ence. Amid these productive plants of nature, the na- tives of such regions lead an idle life, and selddém rise above a low scale of advancement; but in the temperate regions of the globe, where the unceasing effort of the inhabitants is required to procure their daily food, we find the greatest development of human energies and ingenui- ty—there man thinks, and works; there, indeed, he is forced to improve the natural productions of the earth— and there we shall find him progressing. As with every- thing else, so it is with fruits, some of which were natur- ally indifferent or even inedible, until subjected to the meliorating influences of high culture, of selection, and of improvement. Here we find our plants of culture, which so well repay the labor and skill bestowed upon them. INTRODUCTION. 13 In the early periods of the history of our race, while men were nomadic and wandered from place to place, little attention was paid to any department of agricultural improvement, and still less care was bestowed upon hor- ticulture. Indeed, it can scarcely be supposed that, un- der such conditions, either branch of the art could have existed, any more than they are now found among the wandering hordes of Tartars on the steppes of Asia. So soon, however, as men began to take possession of the soil by a more permanent tenure, agriculture and horticul- ture also, attracted their chief attention, and were soon developed into arts of life. With advancing civilization, this has been successively more and more the case; the producing art being obliged to keep pace with the in- creased number of consumers, greater ingenuity was re- quired and was applied to the production of food for the teeming millions of human beings that covered the earth, and, as we find, in China, at the present time, the greatest pains were taken to make the earth yield her increase. High civilization demands high culture of the soil, and agriculture becomes an honored pursuit, with every de- partment of art and science coming to its assistance. At the same time, and impelled by the same necessities, sup- ported and aided by the same co-adjutors, horticulture also advances in a similar ratio, and, from its very nature, assumes the rank of a fine art, being less essential than pure agriculture, and in some of its branches being rather an ornamental than simply a useful art. It is not admit- ted, however, that any department of horticulture is to be considered useless, and many of its applications are emi- nently practical, and result in the production of vast quan- 14 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. tities of human food of the most valuable kind. This pursuit always marks the advancement of a community. —As our western pioneers progress in their improvements from the primitive log cabins to the more elegant and sub- stantial dwelling houses, we ever find the garden and the orchard, the vine-arbor and the berry-patch taking their piaces beside the other evidences of progress. These constitute to them the poetry of common life, of the farmer’s life. The culture of fruits, and gardens also, contributes in no small degree to the improvement of a people by the excellent moral influence it exercises upon them. Every- thing that makes home attractive must contribute to this desirable end. Beyond the sacred confines of the happy hearthstone, with its dear familiar circle, there can be no more pleasant associations than those of the garden, where, in our tender years, we have aided loved parents, from them taking the first lessuns in plant-culture, gather- ing the luscious fruits of their planting or of our own; nor of the rustic arbor, in whose refreshing shade we have reclined to rest and meditate amid its sheltering canopy of verdure, and where we have gathered the purple ber- ries of the noble vine at a later period of the rolling year; nor of the orchard, with its bounteous supplies of golden and ruddy apples, blushing peaches, and melting pears. With such attractions about our homes, with such ties to be sundered, it is wonderful, and scarcely credible, that youth should ever be induced to wander from them, and to stray into paths of evil. Such happy influences must have a good moral effect upon the young. If it be argued that such luxuries will tend to degrade our morals by making INTRODUCTION. 15 us effeminate and sybaritic, or that such enjoyments may become causes of envy and consequent crime on the part of those who are less highly favored, it may be safely assert- ed that there is no better cure for fruit-stealing, than to give presents of fruit, and especially of fruit-trees, to your neighbors, particularly to the boys—encourage each to plant and to cherish his own tree, and he will soon learn the meaning of meum and tuum, and will appreciate the beauties of the moral code, which he will be all the more likely to respect in every other particular. Some of the legislation of our country is a very curious relic of barbarism. According to common law, that which is attached to the soil, may be removed without a breach of propriety, by one who is not an owner of the fee simple; thus, such removal of a vegetable product does not constitute theft or larceny, but simply amounts. to a trespass: whereas the taking of fruit from the ground beneath the tree, even though it be defective or decaying, is considered a theft. An unwelcome intruder, or an un- bidden guest, may enter our orchard, garden, or vineyard, and help himself at his pleasure to any of our fruits, which we have been most carefully watching and nursing for months upon trees, for the fruitage of which we may have been laboring and waiting for years, and, forsooth, our only recourse is to sue him at the law, and our only satisfaction, after all the attendant-annoyance and expense, is a paltry fine for trespass upon our freehold, which, of course, is not commensurate with our estimate of the value of the articles taken: fruits often possess, in the eyes of the devoted orchardist, a real value much beyond their market price. 16 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. Were I asked to describe the location of the fabled fountain of Hygeia, I should decide that it was certainly situated in an orchard; it must have come bubbling from earth that sustained the roots of tree and vine; it must have been shaded by the umbrageons branches of tbe wide-spreading apple and pear, and it was doubtless ap- proached by alleys that were lined by peach trees laden with their downy fruit, and over-arched by vines bearing rich clusters of the luscious grape, and they were gar- nished at their sides by the crimson strawberry. Such at least would have been an appropriate setting for so valued a jewel as the fountain of health, and it is certain that the pursuit of fruit-growing is itself conducive to the posses- sion of that priceless blessing. The physical as well as the moral qualities of our nature are wonderfully pro- -moted by these cares. The vigorous exercise they afford us in the open air, the pleasant excitement, the expecta- tion of the results of the first fruits of our plants, tend- ing, training and cultivating them the while, are all so many elements conducive to the highest enjoyment of full health. The very character of the food furnished by our or- chards should be taken into the account, in making up our estimate of their contributions to the health of a commv- nity. From them we procure aliment of the most refined character, and it has been urged that the elements of which they are composed are perfected or refined to the highest degree of organization that is possible to occur in vegetable tissues. Such pabulum is not only gratefully refreshing, but it is satisfying—without being gross, it is nutritious. The antiscorbutic effects of ripe fruits, espe- INTRODUCTION. 17 cially those that are acid, are proverbial, and every fever patient has appreciated the relief derived from those that are acidulous. Then as a preventive of the febrile affec- tions peculiar to a miasmatic region, the free use of acid fruits, or even of good sound vinegar made from grapes or apples, is an established fact in medical practice—of which, by the by, prevention is always the better part. Apples were esteemed an important and valuable ar- ticle of food in the days of the Romans, for all school boys have read in the ore rotundo of his own flowing measures, what Virgil has said, so much better than his tame translator : “ New cheese and chestnuts are our country fare, With mellow apples for your welcome cheer.” But in more modern times, beside their wonted use as des- sert fruit, or evening feast, or cooked in various modes, a French economist “has invented and practiced with great success a method of making bread with common apples, which is said to be very far superior to potato-bread. After having boiled one-third part of peeled apples, he bruised them while quite warm into two-thirds parts of flour, including the proper quantity of yeast, and kneaded the whole without water, the juice of the fruit being quite sufficient; he put the mass into a vessel in which he al- lowed it to rise for about twelve hours. By this process he obtained a very excellent bread, full of eyes, and ex- tremely light and palatable.” * Nor is this class of food desirable for man alone. Fruits of all kinds, but particularly what may be called * Companion for the Orchard. —Phillips. 18 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. the large fruits, such as are grown in our orchards, may be profitably cultivated for feeding our domestic animals. Sweet apples have been especially recommended for fat- tening swine, and when fed to cows they increase the flow of milk, or produce fat according to the condition of these animals. Think of the luxury of eating apple-fed pork ! Why, even the strict Rabbi might overcome his preju- dices against such swine flesh! And then dream of enjoy- ing the luxury of fresh rich milk, yellow cream, and golden butter, from your winter dairy, instead of the sky-blue fluid, and the pallid, or anotto-tinted, but insipid butter, resulting from the meager supplies of nutriment contained in dry hay and fibrous, woody cornstalks. Now this is not unreasonable nor ridiculous. Orchards have been planted with a succession of sweet apples that will sus- tain swine in a state of most perfect health, growing and fattening simultaneously from June to November; and the later varieties may be cheaply preserved for feeding stock of all kinds during the winter, when they Will be best prepared by steaming, and may be fed with the great- est advantage. Our farmers do not appreciate the benefits of having green food for their animals during the winter season. Being blessed with that royal grain, the Indian corn, they do not realize the importance of the provision of roots which is so great a feature in British husbandry ; but they have yet to learn, and they will learn, that for us, and under our conditions of labor and climate, they can do still better, and produce still greater results with a combination of hay or straw, corn meal and apple, all properly prepared by means of steam or hot water. Be- sides, such orchards may be advantageously planted in INTRODUCTION. 19 many places where the soil is not adapted to the produc- tion of grain.—The reader is referred to the chapter on select lists in another part of this volume, in which an at- tempt will be made to present the reader with the opinions of the best pomologists of various parts of the country. It were an interesting and not unprofitable study to’ trace the various sources and routes by which fruits have been introduced into different parts of our extended coun- try. In some cases we should find that we were indebted ° for these luxuries to the efforts of very humble individu- als, while in other regions the high character of the or- chards is owing to the forethought, knowledge, enterprise, and liberality of some prominent citizen of the infant com- munity, who has freely spent his means and bestowed his cares in providing for others as well as for his own neces- sities or pleasures. But it is to the intelligent nurserymen of our country that we are especially indebted for the uni- versal diffusion of fruits, and for the selection of the best varieties in each different section. While acting separate- ly, these men were laboring under great disadvantages, and frequently cultivated certain varieties under a diver- sity of names, as they had received them from various sources. This was a difficulty incident to their isolation, but the organization of Pomological Societies in various parts of the country, has enabled them in a great measure to unravel the confusion of an extended synonymy, and also by comparison and consultation with the most ivtel- ligent fruit-growers, they bave been prepared to advise the planter as to the best and most profitable varieties to be set out in different soils and situations. Most of our first orchards were planted with imported 20 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. trees. The colonists brought plants and seeds. Even now, in many parts of the country, we hear many good fruits designated as English, to indicate that they are con- sidered superior to the native; and we are still importing ckoice varieties from Europe and other quarters of the globe. The roving tribes of Indians who inhabited this coun- try when discovered and settled by the whites, had no or- chards—they lived by the chase, and only gathered such ' fruits as were native to the soil. Among the earliest at- tempts to civilize them, however, those that exerted the greatest influence, were efforts to make them an agricul- tural people, and of these the planting of fruit-trees was one of the most successful. In many parts of the coun- try we find relics of these old Indian orchards still remairi- ing, and it is probable that from the apple seeds sent by the general government for distribution among the Cher- okees in Georgia, we are now reaping some of the most valuable fruits of this species. The early French settlers were famous tree-planters, and we find their traces across the continent, from the St. Lawrence to the Gulf of Mex- ico. These consist in noble pear and apple trees, grown from seeds planted by them, at their early and scattered posts or settlements. These were made far in advance of the pioneers, who have, at a later period, formed the van of civilization, that soon spread into a solid phalanx in its march throughout the great interior valley of the continent. On the borders of civilization we sometimes mect with a singular being, more savage than polished, and yet use- ful in his way. Such an one in the early settlement of the northwestern territory was Johnny Apple-seed—a sim- INTRODUCTION. 21 ple-hearted being, who loved to roam through the forests in advance of his fellows, consorting, now with the red man, now with the white, a sort of connecting link—by his white brethren he was, no doubt, considered rather a vagabond, for we do not learn that he had the industry to open farms in the wilderness, the energy to be a great hunter, nor the knowledge and devotion to have made him a useful missionary among the red men. But Johnny had his use in the world. It was his universal custom, when among the whites, to save the seeds of all the best apples he met with. These he carefully preserved and carried with him, and when far away from his white friends, he would select an open spot of ground, prepare the soil, and plant these seeds, upon the principle of the old Spanish custom, that he owed so much to posterity, so that some day, the future traveler or inhabitant of those fertile valleys, might enjoy the fruits of his early efforts. Such was Johuny Apple-seed—did he not erect for himself monuments more worthy, if not more endur- ing, than piles of marble or statues of brass? : In tracing the progress of fruits through different por- tions of our country, we should very naturally expect to find the law that governs the movements of men, apply- ing with equal force to the fruits they carry with them. The former have been observed to migrate very nearly on parallels of latitude, so have, in a great degree, the latter; and whenever we find a departure from this order, we may expect to discover a change, and sometimes a deteri- oration in the characters of the fruits thus removed to a new locality. It is true, much of this alteration, whether im- provement or otherwise, may be owing to the difference of 22 AMERICAN POMOLOGY soil. Western New York received her early fruits from Connecticut, and Massachusetts; Michigan, Northern Illi- nois, and later, Wisconsin and Iowa received theirs in a great degree from New York. Ohio and Indiana received their fruits mainly from New Jersy, and Pennsylvania, and we may yet trace this in the prevalence of certain leading varieties that are scarcely known, and very little grown on different parallels. The early settlement at the mouth of the Muskingum river, was made by New England-men, and into the “ Ohio-purchase,” they introduced the lead- ing varieties of the apples of Massachusetts. Among these, the Boston or Roxbury Russet was a prominent favorite, but it was so changed in its appearance as scarcely to be recognized by its old admirers, and it was christened with a new name, the Putnam Russet, under the impression that it was a different variety. Most of the original Putnam varieties have disappeared from the orchards, Kentucky received her fruits in great measure from Virginia ; Tennessee trom the same source apd from North Carolina, and these younger States sent them for- ward on the great western march with their hardy sons to southern Indiana, southern Illinois, to Missouri, and to Arkansas, in all which regions we find evident traces in the orchards, of the origin of the people who planted them. Of course, we shall find many deflections from the pre- cise parellel of latitude, some inclining to the south, and many turning to the northward. To the latter we of the West are looking with the greatest interest, since we so often find that the northern fruits do not maintain their high characters in their southern or southwestern migra- tions, and all winter kinds are apt to become autumnal in INTRODUCTION. 293 their period of ripening, which makes them less valuable; and because, among those from a southern origin, we have discovered many of high merit as to beauty, flavor, and productiveness—and, especially where they are able to mature sufficiently, they prove to be long keepers, thus supplying a want which was not filled by fraits of a north- ern origin. There may be limits beyond which we can- not transport some sorts to advantage in either direction, but this too will depend very much upon the adaptability of our soils to particular varieties. In every region where fruit has been cultivated we find local varieties grown from seed, many of these are of suf- ficient merit to warrant their propagation, and it behooves us to be constantly on the look out for them; for though our lists are already sufficiently large to puzzle the young orchardist in making his selections, we may well reduce the number by weeding out more of the indifferent fruit, at the same time that we are introducing those of a supe- rior character. It has been estimated that there may be as many as one in ten of our seedling orchard trees that would be ranked as “good,” but not one in a hundred that could be styled “best.”* Certain individuals have devoted themselves to the troublesome though thankless office of collecting these sunttered varieties of decided merit, and from their collections our pomological societies will, from time to time, select and recommend the best for more extended cultivation. Such devoted men as H. N. Gillett, Lewis Jones, Reuben Ragan, A.H. Ernst, who have been industriously engaged in this good work for a quarter of a century, are entitled to the highest com- * Elliott—Western Fruits. 24 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. mendation; but there are many others who have con- tributed their full share of benefits by their labors in the same field, to whom also we owe a debt of gratitude. Two of the chief foci in the Ohio valley from which valuable fruits have been distributed most largely, were the settle- ment at the mouth of the Muskingum, with its Putnam list given below; and a later, but very important intro- duction of choice fruits, brought into the Miami country by Silas Wharton, a nurseryman from Pennsylvania, who settled among a large body of the religious Society of Friends, in Warren Co., Ohio. The impress of this im- portation is very manifest in all the country, within a radius of one hundred miles, and some of his fruits are found doing well in the northwestern part of the State of Ohio, in northern Indiana, and in an extended region westward. There are, no doubt, many other local foci, whence good fruits have radiated to bless regions more or less ex- tensive, and in every neighborhood we find the name of some early pomologist attached to the good fruits that he had introduced, thus adding another synonym to the nu- merous list of those belonging to so many of our good varieties, A. W. Putnam commenced an apple nursery in 1794, 9 few years after the first white settlement at Marietta, Ohio, the first grafts were set in the spring of 1796; they were obtained from Connecticut by Israel Putnam, and were the first set in the State, and grafted by W. Rufus Putnam. Most of the early orchards of the region were planted from this nursery. These grafts were taken from the or- INTRODUCTION. 25 chard of Israel Putnam (of wolf-killing memory) in Pom- fret, Connecticut. In the Ohio Cultivator for August 1st, 1846, may be found the following authentic list of the va- rieties propagated : — “4, Putnam Russet, (Roxbury). . Seek-no-further, (‘Westtield.) 2. 3. Early Chandler. 4. Gilliflower. 5. Pound Royal, (Lowell). 6. Natural, (a seedling). 7. Rbode Island Greening. 8. Yellow Greening. 9, Golden Pippin. 16. Long Island Pippin. j1. Tallman Sweeting. . Striped Sweeting. . Honey Greening. . Kent Pippin. . Cooper. . Striped Gilliflower. . Black, do. . Prolific Beanty. . Queening, (Summer Queen ?) . English Pearmain. . Green Pippin. . Spitzenberg, (Esopus ?) Many of these have disappeared from the orchards and from the nurserymen’s catalogues.” 2 CHAPTER II. HISTORY OF THE APPLE. DIFFICULTIES IN THE OUTSET—-APPLE A GENERIC TERM, AS CORN IS FOR DIFFERENT GRAINS; BIBLE AND HISTORIC USE OF THE WORD THERBFORE UNCERTAIN — ETYMOLOGY OF THE WORD — BOTANICAL CHARACTERS —IMPROVABILITY OF TIE APPLE-—NATIVE COUNTRY —CRUDE NOTIONS OF EARLY VARIETIES—PLINY’S ACCOUNT EX- PLAINED —CHARLATAN GRAFTING — INTRODUCTION INTO BRITAIN — ORIGINAL SORTS THERE—GERARD’S LIST OF SEVEN—HE URGES ORCHARD PLANTING — RECIPE FOR POMATUM — DERIVATION OF THE WORD —VIRGIL’S ADVICE AS TO GRAFTING—PLINY’S EULOGY OF THE APPLE; WILL OURS SURVIVE AS LONG ?-— PLINY’S LIST OF 29— ACCIDENTAL ORIGIN OF OUR FRUITS — CROSSING — LORD Ba- CON’S GUESS— BRADLEY'S ACCOUNT — SUCCESS IN THE NETIER- LANDS — MR. KNIGUT'S EXPERIMENTS — UYBRIDS INFERTILE — LIMITS, NONE NATURAL— LIMITS OF SPECIES — HERBERT'S VIEWS — DIFFICULTIES ATTEND CROSSING ALSO — NO MULES — KIRTLAND'S EXPERIMENTS AND RESULTS OF— VAN MONS’ THEORY — ILLINOIS RESULTS— RUNNING OUT OF VARIETIES. In attempting to trace out the history of any plant that has long been subjected to the dominion of man, we are beset with difficulties growing out of the uncertainty of language, and arising also from the absence of precise terms of’ science in the descriptions or allusions which we meet 26 HISTORY OF THE APPLE. 27 respecting them. As he who would investigate the history of our great national grain crop, the noble Indian maize, which, in our language, claims the generic term corn, will at once meet with terms apt to mislead him in the English translation of the Bible, and in the writings of Europeans, who use the word corn in a generic sense, as applying to all the edible grains, and especiaily to wheat—so in this investigation we may easily be misled by meeting the word apple in the Bible and in the translations of Latin and Greek authors, and we may be permitted to question whether the original words translated apple may not have been applicd to quite different fruits, or perhaps we may ask whether our word may not originally have had a more general sense, meaning as it docs, according to its deriva- tion, any round body. The etymology of the word apple is referred by the lexicographers to abhall, Celtic; avall, Welch; afall or avall, Armoric; aval or avel, Cornish; and these are all traceable to the Celtic word ball, meaning simply a round body. Worcester traces the origin of apple directly to the German apfel, which he derives from cepl, apel, or appel. Webster cites the Saxon appl or appel ; Dutch, appel ; German, apfel ; Danish, ble; Swedish, aple ; Welsh, aval; Irish, abhal or ubhal; Armoric, aval ; Russian, yabloko. Its meaning being fruit in general, with a round form. Thus the Persian word wdhud means Juniper berries, and in Welsh the word used means other fruits, and needs a qualifying term to specify the variety or kind. 28 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. Hogg, in his British Pomology, quoting Owen, says, the ancient Glastonbury was called by the Britons Ynys availac or avallon, meaning an apple orchard, and from this came the Roman word avallonia, from this he infers that the apple was known to the Britons before the ad- vent of the Romans. We are told, that in 973, King Edgar, when fatigued with the labors of the chase, laid himself down under a wild apple tree, so that, it becomes a question whether this plant was not a native of England as of other parts of Europe, where in many places it is found growing wild and apparently indigenous. Thorn- ton informs us in his history of Turkey, that apples are common in Wallachia, and he cites among the varieties one, the domniasca, “‘ which is perhaps the finest in Eu- rope, both for its size, color, and flavor.” It were hard to say what variety this is, and whether it be known to us. The introduction of this word apple in the Bible is at- tributable to the translators, and some commentators sug- gest that they have used it in its general sense, and that in the following passages where it occurs, it refer’ to the citron, orange, or some other subtropical fruit. “Stay me with flagons, comfort me with apples.” — Songs of Solomon ii, 5. “As the apple-tree (citron) among the trees of the wood, * * * I sat me down under his shadow with great delight, and his fruit was sweet to my taste.”—Sol. ii, 2. * * * “T raised thee up under the apple-tree.”—Solo- mon viii, 5. “ A word fitly spoken, is like apples of gold in pictures of silver.”—Prov. xxv, 11. WISTORY OF THE APPLE, 29 The botanical position of the cultivated apple may be stated as follows: — Order, Rosacew ; sub-order, Pomee ; or the apple family and genus, Pyrus. The species under our consideration is the Pyrus Malus, or apple. It has been introduced into this country from Europe, and is now found in a half-wild state, springing up in old fields, hedge-rows, and roadsides; but, even in such situations, by their eatable fruit and broad foliage, and by the ab- sence of spiny or thorny twigs, the trees generally give evidence of a civilized origin. It is not that the plant has changed any of its true specific characters, but that it has been affected by the meliorating influences of cul- ture, which it has not been able entirely to shake off in its neglected condition. Sometimes, indeed, trees are found in these neglected and out-of-the-way situations, which produce fruits of superior quality—and the sorts have been gladly introduced into our nurseries and orchards. Very early in the history of horticulture the apple at- tracted attention by its improvability, showing that it belonged to the class of culture-plants. Indeed & is a very remarkable fact in the study of botany, and the pivot upon which the science and art of horticulture turns, that while there are plants which show no tendency to change : from their normal type, even when brought under the high- est culture, and subjected to every treatment which human ingenuity can suggest, there are others which are prone to variations or sports, even in their natural condition, but more so when they are carefully nursed by the prudent firmer or gardener. These may be called respectively the plants of nature and the plants of culture. Some of the former furnish human food, and are otherwise uscful to 30 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. man; but the latter class embraces by far the larger num- ber of food-plants, and we are indebted to this pliancy, aided by human skill, for our vari-ties of fruits, our escu- lent vegetables, and the floral ort, ments of our gardens. The native country of the apple, though not definitively settled, is generally conceded to be Europe, particularly its southern portions, and perhaps Western Asia: that is, the plant known and designated by botanists as Pyrus Malus, for there are other and distinct species in America and Asia which have no claims to having been the source of our favorite orchard fruits. Our own native crab is the Pyrus coronaria, which, though showing some slight tendency to variation, has never departed from the strongly marked normal type. The P. baccata, or Siberi- an crab, is so distinctly marked as to be admitted as a species. It has wonderfully improved under culture, and has produced some quite distinct varieties; it has even been hybridized by Mr. Knight, with the cultivated sorts of the common Wilding or Crab of Europe, the P. Malus. Pallas, who found it wild near Lake Baikal and in Daouria, says, it grows only 3 or 4 feet high, with a trunk of as many inches diameter, and yields pear-shaped berries as large as peas. The P. rivularis, according to Nuttall, is common in the maritime portions of Oregon, in alluvial forests. The tree attains a height of 15 to 25 fect. It resembles the Siberian Crab, to which it has a close affinity. The fruit grows in clusters, is purple, scarcely the size of a cherry, and of an agreeable flavor; swectish and sub-acid when ripe, not at all acid and acerb as the 2. coronaria.* * North American Sylva, Nuttall [f, p. 25. HISTORY OF THE APPLE. 31 Among the early writers upon the subject of pomology, we find some very crude notions, particularly in regard to the wonderful powers of the grafter, for this art of im- proving the Wilding by inserting buds or scions of better sorts, and thus multiplying trees of good kinds, was a very ancient invention. Pliny, the naturalist, certainly deserves our praise for his wonderful and comprehensive industry in all branches of natural history... In regard to grafting, which seems to have been well understood in his day, he says, that he had seen near Thulie a tree bearing all manner of fruits, nuts and berries, figs and grapes, pears and pomegranates ; no kind of apple or other fruit that was not to be found on this tree. It is quaintly noted, however, that “this tree did not live long,”—is it to be wondered that such should have been the case ? Now some persons may object to the testimony of this remark- able man, and feel disposed to discredit the statement of what appears so incredible to those who are at all ac- quainted with the well-known necessity for a congenial stock into which the graft should be inserted. But a more extended knowledge of the subject, would explain what Pliny has recorded as a marvel of the art. The same thing has been done in our own times, it is a trick, and one which would very soon be detected now-a-days by the merest tyro in horticulture, though it may have escaped the scrutiny of Pliny, whose business it was to note and record the results of his observations, rather than to examine the modus of the experiment. By the French, the method is called Charlatan grafting, and is done by taking a stock of suitable size, hollowing it out, and introducing through its cavity several stocks of dif- 82 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. ferent kinds, upon each of which may be produced a dif- ferent sort of fruit, as reported by Pliny. The needed affinity of the scion and stock, and the possible range that may be successfully taken in this mode of propagation, with the whole consideration of the influence of the stock upon the graft, will be more fully discussed in another chapter. Though it be claimed and even admitted that the wild apple or crab was originally a native of Britain, and though it be well known that many varieties have origi- nated from seed in that country, still it appears from their own historians that the people introduced valuable vari- eties from abroad. Thus we find in Fuller’s account, that in the 16th year of the reign of Henry VIII, Pippins were introduced into England by Lord Maschal, who planted them at Plumstead, in Sussex. After this, the celebrated Golden Pippin ws . originated at Perham Park, in Sussex, and this variety has attained a high meed of praise in that country and in Europe, though it has never been considered so fine in this coun- try as some of our own seedlings. Evelyn says, in 1685, at Lord Clarendon’s seat, at Swallowfield, Berks, there is an orchard of one thousand golden and other cider Pippins.* The Ribston Pippin, which every Englishman will tell you is the best apple in the world, was a native of Rib- ston Park, Yorkshire. Hargrave says: “ This place is re- markable for the produce of a delicious apple, called the Ribston Park Pippin. The original tree was raised from a Pippin brought from France.{ This apple is well-known in this country, but not a favorite. * Diary. t History of Knaresborough, p. 216.—Companion of the Orchard, p. 34. HISTORY OF THE APPLE, 33 At a later period, 1597, John Gerard issued in an ex- uusive folio his History of Plants, in which he mentions seven kinds of Pippins. The following is given asa sam- ple of the pomology of that day : — “The fruit of apples do differ in greatnesse, forme, colour, and taste, some covered with red skin, others yel- low or greene, varying infinitely according to soil and climate; some very greate, some very little, and many of middle sort; some are sweet of taste, or something soure, most be of middle taste between sweet and soure; the which to distinguish, I think it impossible, notwithstand- ing I heare of one who intendeth to write a peculiar vol- ume of apples and the use of them.” He further says: “The tame and grafted apple trees are planted and set in gardens and orchards made for that purpose; they delight to growe in good fertile grounds. Kent doth abounde with apples of most sortes; but I have seen pastures and hedge-rows about the grounds of a worshipful gentleman dwelling two miles from Hereford, so many trees of all sortes, that the seruantes drinke for the.moste parte no other drinke but that which is made of apples. * * * Like as there be divers manured apples, so is there sundry wilde apples or crabs, not husbanded, that is, not graft- ed.” He also speaks of the Paradise, which is probably the same we now use as a dwarfing stock. Dr. Gerard fully appreciated the value of fruits, and thus vehemently urges his countrymen to plant orchards: “ Gentlemen, that have land and living, put forward, * * * * * oraft, set, plant, and nourish up trees in every cor- ner of your grounds; the labor is small, the cost is noth- ing, the commoditie is great, yourselves shall have plentie, 9x 34 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. the poor shall have somewhat in time of want to relieve their necessitie, and God shall reward your good minde and diligence.” The same author gives us a peculiar use of the apple which may be interesting to some who never before associated pomatum with the products of the or- chard. He recommends apples as a cosmetic. ‘ There is made an ointment with the pulp of apples, and swinc’s grease and rose water, which is used to beautify the face and to take away the roughness of the skin; it is called in shops pomatum, of the apples whereof it is made.” * When speaking of the importance of grafting to increase the number of trees of any good variety, Virgil advises to *« Graft the tender shoot, Thy children’s children shall enjoy the fruit.” So high an estimate did Pliny have of this fruit, that he asserted that “there are apples that have ennobled the countries from whence they came, and many apples have immortalized their first founders and inventors. Our best apples will immortalize their first grafters forever; such as took their names from Manlius, Cestius, Matius, and Claudius.”—Of the Quince apple, he says, that came of a quince being grafted upon the apple stock, which “smell like the quince, and were called Appiana, after Appius, who was the first that practiced this mode of grafting. Some are so red that they resemble blood, which is caused by their being grafted upon the mulberry stock. Of all the apples, the one which took its name from Petisius, was the most excellent for cating, both on account of its * Our lexicographers give it a similar origin, but refer it to the shape in which it was put up. Others derive it from poma, Spanish, a box of perfume. HISTORY OF THE APPLE. 35 swectness and its agreeable flavor.” Pliny mentions twenty-nine kinds of apples cultivated in Italy, about the commencement of the Chistian Era. Alas! for human vanity and apple glory! Where are now these boasted sorts, upon whose merits the immortal- ity of their inventors and first grafters was to depend? They have disappeared from our lists to give place to new favorites, to some of which, perhaps, we are disposed to award an equally high meed of praise, that will again be ignored in a few fleeting years, when higher skill and more scientific applications of knowledge shall have pro- duced superior fruit to any of those we now prize so high- ly; and this is a consummation to which we may all look forward with pleasure. In this country the large majority of our favorite fruits, of whatever species or kind, seem to have originated by accident, that is, they have been discovered in seedling or- chards, or even in hedge-rows. These have no doubt, however, been produced by accidental crosses of good kinds, and this may occur through the intervention of in- sects in any orchard of good fruit, where there may chance to be some varieties that have the tendency to progress. The discoveries of Linnzus, and his doctrine of the sexual characters of plants, created quite a revolu- tion in botany, and no doubt attracted the attention of Lord Bacon, who was a close observer of nature, for he ventured to guess that there might be such a thing as crossing the breeds of plants, when he says: — The com- pounding or mixture of kinds in plants is not found out, * Phillips’ Companion, p. 32. 36 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. which, nevertheless, if it be possible, is more at command: than that of living creatures; wherefore it were one of the most noteable experiments touching plants to find it out, for so you may have great variety of new fruits and flowers yet unknown. Grafting does it not, that mendeth the fruit or doubleth the flowers, ctc., but hath not the power to make a new kind, for the scion ever overruleth the stock.” In which last observation he shows more knowledge and a deeper insight into the hidden mysteries of plant-life than many a man in our day, whose special business it is to watch, nurse, and care for these humble forms of existence. Bradley, about a century later, in 1718, is believed to have been the first author who speaks of the accomplish- ment of cross-breeding, which he describes as having been effected by bringing together the branches of different trees when in blossom. But the gardeners ot Holland and the Netherlands were the first to put it into practice.* The following extract is given to explain the manner in which Mr. Knight conducted his celebrated experiments on fruits, which rewarded him with some varietics that were highly esteemed:—“ Many varieties of the apple were collected which had been proved to afford, in mixtures with each other, the finest cider. -A tree of each was then obtained by grafting upon a Paradise stock, and these trees were trained to a south wall, or if grafted on Siberian crab, to a west wall, till they afforded blossoms, and the soil in which they were planted was made of the most rich and favorable kind. Each blos- * Phillips’ Companion, p. 41. HISTORY OF THE APPLE, 37 som of this species of fruit contains about twenty chives or males (stamens,) and generally five pointals or fe- males (pistils,) which spring from the center of the cup or cavity of the blossom. The males stand in a circle just within the bases of the petals, and are forined of slender threads, cach of which terminates in an anther. It is necessary in these experiments that both the fruit and seed should attain as large a size and as much perfection as pos- sible, and therefore a few blossoms only were suffered to remain on each tree. As soon as the blossoms were nearly full-grown, every male in each was carefully extracted, proper care being taken not to injure the pointals; and the blossoms, thus prepared, were closed again, and suf- fered to remain till they opened spontaneously. The blossoms of the tree which it was proposed to make the male parent of the future variety, were accelerated by be- ing brought into contact with the wall, or retarded by be- ing detached from it, so that they were made to unfold at the required period; and a portion of their pollen, when ready to fall from the mature anthers, was during three or four successive mornings deposited upon the pointals of the blossoms, which consequently afforded seeds. It is necessary in this experiment that one varicty of apple only should bear unmutilated blossoms; for, where other varieties are in flower at the same time, the pollen of these will often be conveyed by bees to the prepared blossoms, and the result of the experiment will in consequence be uncertain and unsatisfactory.” * * * In his Pomona Herefordiensis, he says: — “It is neces- sary to contrive that the two trees from which you intend to raise the new kind, shall blossom at the same time; 38 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. therefore, if one is an earlier sort than the other, it must be retarded by shading or brought into a cooler situation, and the latest forwarded by a warm wall or a sunny posi- tion, so as to procure the desired result.” We must distinguish between hybrids proper and crosses, as it were between races or between what may have been erroneously designated species, for there has been a great deal of looseness in the manner of using these terms by some.xwriters. A true hybrid * is produced only when the pollen of one species has been used to fertilize the ovules of another, and as a general rule these can only be pro- duced between plants which are very nearly allied, as be- tween species of the same genus. Even such as these, however, cannot always be hybridized, for we have never found a mule or hybrid between the apple and pear, the currant and gooseberry, nor between the raspberry and blackberry, though each of these, respectively, appear to be very nearly related, and they are all of the order Rosacee. . In hybrids there appears to be a mixture of the ele- ments of each, and the characters of the mule or cross will depend upon one or the other, which it will more nearly resemble. True hybrids are mules or infertile, and cannot be continued by seed, but must be propagated by cuttings, or layers, or grafting. If not absolutely sterile at first, they become so in the course of the second or third generation. This is proved by several of our flow- ering plants that have been wonderfully varied by ingeni- ous crossing of different species. But it has been found * Balfour’s Manual. HISTORY OF THE APPLE, 39 that the hybrid may be fertilized by pollen taken from one of its parents, and that then the offspring assumes the characters of that parent.* Natural hybrids do not often occur, though in diecious plants, this seems to have been the case with willows that present such an intricate puzzle to botanists in their classification, so that it has become almost impossible to say what are the limits and bounds of some of the species. Ilybrids are, however, very frequently produced by art, and particularly among our flowering plants, under the hands of ingenious gardeners. Herbert thinks, from his observations, “that the flowers and organs of reproduc- tion partake of the characters of the female parent, while the foliage and habit, or the organs of vegetation, re- semble the male.” Simply crossing different members of the same species, like the crossing of races in animal life, is not always easily accomplished ; but we here find much less difficulty, and we do not produce a mule progeny. In these experi- ments the same precautions must be taken to avon the interference of natural agents in the transportation of pollen from flower to flower; but this process is now so familiar to horticulturists, that it scarcely needs a mention. In our efforts with the strawberry, some very curious re- sults have occurred, and we have learned that some of the recognized species appear under this severe test to be- well founded, as the results have been infertile. Where the perfection of the fruit depends upon the development of the seed, this is a very important matter to the fruit- grower; but fortunately this is not always the case, for * Balfour’s Manual. 40 . AMERICAN POMOLOGY. -certain fruits swell and ripen perfectly, though containing not a single well developed seed. It would be an interest- ing study to trace out those plants which do furnish a well developed fleshy substance or sarcocarp, without the true sceds. Such may be found occasionally in the native per- simmon, in certain grapes, and in many apples; but in the strawberry, blackberry, and raspberry, the berry which constitutes our desirable fruit, never swel!s unless the germs have been impregnated and the seeds perfect. In the stone-fruits the stone or pit is always developed, but the enclosed seed is often imperfect from want of impreg- nation or other cause—and yet the fleshy covering will ‘sometimes swell and ripen. Onc of the most successful experimenters in this coun- try is Doctor J. P. Kirtland, near Cleveland, Ohie, whose efforts at crossing certain favorite cherries, were crowned with the most happy results, and all are familiar with the fruits that have been derived from his crosses. The details of his applying the pollen of one flower to the pistils of another are familiar to all intelligent readers, and have been so often set forth, that they need not be repeated in this case—great care is necessary to secure the desired object, and to guard against interference from causes that would endanger or impair the value of the results. Van Mons’ theory was based upon certain assumptions and observations, some of which are well founded, others are not so firmly established. He claimed correctly that all our best fruits were artificial products, because the essential elements for the preservation of the species in their natural condition, are vigor of the plant and perfect seeds for the perpetuation of the race. It has been the HISTORY OF THE APPLE. " 41 object of culture to diminish the extreme vigor of the tree so as to produce early fruitage, and at the same time to enlarge and to refine the pulpy portion of the fruit. He claimed, as a principle, that our plants of culture had always a tendency to run back toward the original or wild type, when they were grown from seeds. This tendency is admitted to exist in many cases, but it is also claimed, that when a break is once made from the normal type, the tendency to improve may be established. Van Mons asserted that the sceds from old trees would be stifl more apt to run back toward the original type, and that “the older the tree, the nearer will the seedlings raised from it approach the wild state,” though he says they will not quite reach it. But the seeds from a young tree, having itself the tendency to melioration, are more likely to pro- duce improved sorts. He thinks there is a limit to perfection, and that, when this is reached, the next gencration will more probably produce bad fruit than those grown from an inferior sort, which is on the upward road of progression. IIe chims that the seeds of the oldest varieties of good fruit yield inferior kinds, whereas those taken from new varicties of bad fruit, and reproduced for several generations, will cer- tainly give satisfactory results in good fruit. He began with secds from a young seedling tree, not grafted upon another stock; he cared nothing for the quality of the fruit, but preferred that the variety was showing a tendency to improvement or variation. These were sowed, and from the plants produced, he selected such as appeared to him to have evidence of improvement, (it is supposed by their less wild appearance), and trans- 42 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. planted them to stations where they could develop them- selves. When they fruited, even if indifferent, if they continued to give evidence of variation, the first seeds were saved and planted and treated in the same way. These came earlier into fruit than the first, and showed a greater promise. Successive generations were thus produced to the fourth and fifth, each came into bearing earlier than its predecessor, and produced a greater number of good varieties, and he says that in the fifth generation they were nearly all of great excellence. He found pears re- quired the longest time, five generations; while the apple was perfected in four, and stone fruits in three. Starting upon the theory that we must subdue the vigor of the wilding to produce the best fruits, he cut off the tap roots when transplanting and shortened the leaders, and crowded the plants in the orchard or fruiting grounds, so as to stand but a few feet apart. He urged the “regen- erating in a direct line of descent as rapidly as possible an improving variety, taking caré that there be no in- terval between the generations. To sow, re-sow, to sow again, to sow perpetually, in shért to do nothing but sow, is the practice to be pursued, and which cannot be de- parted from; and, in short, this is the whole secret of the art I have employed.” (Arbres Fruitiers.) Who else would have the needed patience and persever- ance to pursue such a course? Very few, indeed—es- pecially if they were not very fully convinced of the cor- rectness of the premises upon which this theory is found- ed. Mr. Downing thinks that the great numbers of fine varieties of apples that have been produced in this coun- try, go to sustain the Van Mons doctrine, because, as he HISTORY OF THE APPLE - 43 assumes, the first apples that were produced from seeds brought over by the early emigrants, yielded inferior fruit, which had run back toward the wild state, and the people were forced to begin again with them, and that they most naturally pursued this very plan, taking sceds from the improving varieties for the next generations and soon. This may have been so, but it is mere assumption —we have no proof, and, on the contrary, our choice va- rieties have so generally been conceded to have been chance seedlings, that there appears little evidence to support it—on the contrary, some very fine varieties have been produced by selecting the seeds of good sorts pro- miscuously, and without regarding the age of the trees from which the fruit was taken, Mr. Downing himself, after telling us that we have much encouragement to ex- periment upon this plan of perfecting fruits, by taking seeds from such as are not quite ripe, gathered from a seedling of promising quality, from a healthy young tree (quite young,) on its own rvot, not grafted, and that we “must avoid Ist, the seeds of old trees; 2d, those of grafted trees; 3d, that we must have the best grounds for good results ”’—still admits what we all know, that “in this country, new varictics of rare excellence are some- times obtained at once by planting the seeds of old grafted varieties ; thus the Lawrence Favorite and the Columbia Plums were raised from secds of the Green Gage, one of the oldest European varicties.” Let us now look at an absolute experiment conducted avowedly upon the Van Mons plan in our own country, upon the feriile soil of the State of Illinois, aud sce to what results it led :-- 44 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. The following facts have been elicited from correspond- ence with H. P. Brayshaw, of Du Quoin, Illinois. The experiments were instituted by his father many years ago, to test the truth of the Van Mons’ theory of the improve- ment of fruits by using only the first seeds. Thirty-five years ago, in 1827, his father procured twen- ty-five seedling trees from a nursery, which may be sup- posed to have been an average lot, grown from promiscu- ous seed. These were planted, and when they came into bearing, six of thera furnished fruit that might be called “good,” and of these, “ four were considered fine.” One of the six is still in cultivation, and known as the Zdlinois Greening. Of the remainder of the trees, some of the fruits were fair, and the rest were worthless, and have disappeared. Second Generation. — The first fruits of these trees were selected, and the seeds were sown. Of the resulting crop, some furnished fruit that was “good,” but they do not appear to have merited much attention. Third Generation.—From first seeds of the Above, one hundred trees were produced, some of which were good fruit, and some “ even fine,” while some were very poor, “four or five only merited attention.” So that we see a retrogression from the random seedlings, furnishing twen- ty-five per cent. of good fruit, to only four or five per cent. in the third generation, that were worthy of note. Fourth Generation.—A crop of the first seed was again sown, producing a fourth generation; of these many were “good culinary fruits,” none, or very few being of the “ poorest class of seedlings,” none of them, however, were fine enough “ for the dessert.” HISTORY OF THE APPLE. 5 ’ Fifth Generation.— This crop of seedlings was de- stroyed by the cut-worms, so that only one tree now re- mains, but has not yet fruited. But Mr. Brayshaw ap- pears to feel hopeful of the results, and promises to continue the experiment. Crops have also been sown from some of these trees,. but a smaller proportion of the seedlings thus produced were good fruits, than when the first seeds were nsed— this Mr. Brayshaw considers confirmatory evidence of the theory, though he appears to feel confidence in the va- rictics already in use, most of which had almost an ac- cidental origin. He thinks the result would have been more successful had the blossoms been protected from impregnation by other trees, and recommends that those to be experi- mented with should be planted at a distance from orchards, so as to avoid this cross-breeding, and to allow of what is called breeding in-and-in. If this were done, he feels confident that “the seedlings would more nearly resemble the parent, and to a certain extent would manifest the ten- dency to improvement, and that from the earliest ripened fruits, some earlier varietics would be produced, from those latest ripening, later varieties, from those that were inferior and insipid, poor sorts would spring, and that from the very best and most perfect fruits we might expect one in one thousand, or one-tenth of one per cent., to be better than the parent. This diminishes the chance fur improvement to a beatifully fine point upon which to hang our hopes of the result of many generations of seed- lings occupying more than a lifetime of experiments. Mr, Brayshaw, citing some of the generally adopted 46 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. axioms of breeders of animals, assumes that crosses, as of ' distinct races, will not be so likely to produce good results, as a system of breeding in-and-in, persistently carried out. This plan he recommends, and alludes to the quince and mulberry as suitable species to operate upon, because in them there are fewer varictics, and therefore less liability to cross-breeding, and a better opportunity for breeding in-and-in. IIe also reminds us of the happy results which follow the careful selection of the best specimens in gar- den flowers and vegetables, combined with the rejection of all inferior plants, when we desire to improve the char- acter of our garden products, and he adopts the views of certain physiologists, which, however, are questioned by other authorities, to the effect that violent or decided crosses are always followed by depreciation and deteriora- tion of the offspring. The whole communication referring to these experiments, which are almost the only ones, so far as I know, which have been conducted in this country to any extent, to verify or controvert the Van Mons’ theory, is very inter- esting, but it is easy to perecive that the experimenter, though apparently very fair, and entirely honest, has been fully imbued with the truth and correctness of the propo- sition of Van Mons, that the first ripened seed of a nat- ural plant was more likely to produce an improved va- riety, and that this tendency to improvement would ever increase, and be most prominent in the first ripened seeds of successive generations grown Trom it. The theory of Van Mons I shall not attempt in this place to controvert, but will simply say that nothing which has yet come under my observation has had a ten- HWISTORY OF THE APPLE. 47 dency to make me a convert to the avowed views of that great Belgian Pomologist, while, on the contrary, the rumors of his opponents, that he was really attempting to produce crosses from some of the best fruits, as our gar- deners have most successfully done in numerous instances, in the beautiful flowers and delicious vegetables of modern horticulture, have always impressed me with a color of probability, and if he were not actually and intentionally impregnating the blossoms with pollen of the better vari- cties, nataral causes, such as the moving currents of air, and the ever active insects, whose special function in many instances appears to be the conveyance of pollen, would necessarily cause an admixture, which, in a promiscuous and crowded collection, like the “school of Van Mons,” would at. least have an equal chance of producing an im- prevement in some of the resulting seeds, The whole subject of variation in species, the existence of varieties, and also of those partial sports, which may perhaps be considered as still more temporary variations from the originals, than those which come through the seeds, is one of deep interest, well worthy of our study, but. concerning which we must confess ourselves as yet quite ignorant, and our best botanists do not agree even us to the specific distinctions that have been set up as rharacters of some of our familiar plants, for the most eminent differ with regard to the species of some of our romminon trees and plants. RUNNING OUT OF VALIETIES. It has been a very generally received opinion among in- tellixent fruit-growers, that any given variety of fruit can 48 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. have but a limited period of existence, be that longer or shorter. Reasoning from the analogies of animal life this. would appear very probable, for it is well known that in- dividuals of different species all have a definite period of life, some quite brief, others quite extended, beyond which they do not survive. But with our modern views of vege- tation, though we know that all perennial plants do even- tually die and molder away to the dust from whence they were created, and that many trees of our own planting come to an untimely end, while we yet survive to observe their decay, still, we can see no reason why a tree or parts of a tree taken from it, and placed under circumstances favorable to its growth from time to time, may not be sem- piternal. Harvey has placed this matter in a correct light, by showing that the true life and history of a tree is in the buds, which are annual, while the tree itself is the connecting link between them and the ground. Any portion of such a compound existence, grafted upon an- other stock, or planted immediately in the ground itself and established upon its own roots, will produce a new tree like the first, being furnished with supplies of nour- ishment it may grow indefinitely while retaining all the qualities of the parent stock—if that be healthy and vig- orous so will this—indeed new life and vigor often seem to be imparted by a congenial thrifty stock, and a fertile soil, 0) that there does not appear to be any reason why the variety should ever run out and disappear. The distinguished Thomas Andrew Knight, President of the London H-e .+*-{tural Society, was one of the lead- ing advocates of the theory that varieties would neces- sarily run out and disappear as it were by exhaustion. HISTORY OF THE APPLE, 49 In his Pomona IIcretordiensis, he tells us that “those ap- ples, which have been long in cultivation, are on the de- cay. The Redstreak and Golden Pippin can no longer he propagated with advantage. The fruit, like the parent tree, is xflected by the debilitated old age of the variety.” And in his treatise on the culture of the apple and pear, he says: “The Moil and its successful rival, the Red- streak, with the Must and Golden Pippin, are in the last stage of decay, and the Stire and Foxwhelp are hasten- ing rapidly after them.” In noticing the decay of apple trees, Pliny probably refers to particular trees, rather than the whole of any variety, when he says that “apples be- come old sooner than any other tree, and the fruit be- comes smaller and is subject to be cankered and worm- eaten, even while on the trees.’—Lib. XVI, Chap. 27. Speechly combated the views of Mr. Knight, and says : “It is much to be regretted that this apparently visionary notion of the extinction of certain kinds of apples should have been promulgated by authors of respectability, since the mistake will, for a time at least, be productive of sev- eral ill consequences.” Some of the old English varieties that were supposed to he worn out or exhausted, appear to have taken a new lease of life in this country, but we have not yet had a long enough experience to decide this question. Many of the earlier native favorites of the orchard have, for some reason, disappeared from cultivation—whether they have run out, were orisinatly deficient in vigor, or have merely heen superseded ly more acceptable varieties, does not appear Mr. Phillips, in his Companion, states “that in 1819, he eo 50 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. observed a great quantity of the Golden Pippin in Covent Garden Market, which were in perfect condition, and was induced to make inquiries respecting the health of the variety, which resulted in satisfactory replies from all quarters, that the trees were recovering from disease, which he thought had been induced by a succession of un- propitious seasons. He cites Mr. Ronald’s opinion, that there was then no fear of losing this variety ; and Mr. Lee, who thought that the apparent decay of some trees was owing to unfavorable seasons. Mr. Harrison in- formed him that this variety was very successfully grown on the mountains of the island of Madeira, at an elevation of 3000 feet, and produced abundantly. Also that the va- riety was quite satisfactory in many parts of England, and concludes that the Golden Pippin only requires the most genial situation, to render it as prolific 1s formerly.” It is quite probable, as Phillips suggests, that Mr. Knight had watched the trees during unfavorable seasons which prevailed at that period, and as he found the disease increase, he referred it to the old age of the variety, and hased his theory to that effect upon partial data. Mr. Knight’s views, though they have taken a strong hold upon the popular mind, have not been confirmed by physiologists. For though the seed would appear to be the proper source whence to“dcrive our new plants, and certainly our new varieties of fruits, many plants have, for an indefinite period, been propagated by layers, shoots or scious, buds, tubers, etc., and that the variety has thus been extended much beyond the period of the life of the parent or original seedling, Strawberries are propagated and multiplied by the runners, potatoes by tubers, the IUSTORY OF THE APPLE. 51 Tiger Lily by bulblets, some onions by proliferous bulbs, sugar cane by planting pieces of the stalk, many grapes by horizontal stems, and many plants by cuttings, for a very great length of time. The grape vine has been continued in this way from the days of the Romans. A slip taken from a willow iu Mr. Knight’s garden pronounced by him to be dying from old age, was planted in the Edinburgh Botanic Garden many years ago, and is now a vigorous tree, though the original stock has long since gone to de- cay.* ® Balfour's Manual, p. 284. CHAPTER. III. PROPAGATION.—SECTION I. ALL GROWTH IS DEPENDANT UPON THE DEVELOPMENT OF CEILS — IHE SEED AND THE BUD; THEIR RESEMBLANCE— THE INDIVIPUALI- TY OF BUDS — THE BASIS OF ALL PROPAGATION — BUDS ARE DEVEL- OPED INTO TWIGS ; HAVE POWER OF EMITTING ROOTS — IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY OF CELL-GROWTH —— BY CUTTINGS: PREPARATION AND SELECTION — HEEL-CUTTINGS — SOFT WOOD— HARD WOOD — SEASONS FOR EACH — FALL PLANTING — THE CALLUS, OR DEVELOP- MENT OF CELL-GROWTH — BOTTOM HE/™; WHY BENEFICIAL — WHY SPRING CUTTINGS FAIL —STIMULUS OF LIGHT UPON THE BUDS, CAUSES THEM TO EXPAND, AND THE LEAVES EVAPORATE TOO FREE- LY— ROOT CUTTINGS ; DIFFERENT drorrs THUS PROPAGATED —— BY SUCKERS: OBJECTIONS TO ANSWERED— SUCKER ORCIIARDS ; BEAR EARLY — SUCKER TREES APT TO SUCKER AGAIN ——BY LAY- ERS: A NATURAL METHOD — HOW PERFORMED — THE RASPBERRY AND THE GRAPE— ILLUSTRATIONS OF NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL METHODS — QUINCE STOCKS — ADJUVANTS TO LAYERING, NOTCHING, ETC-——BY SEEDS: HOW IT DIFFERS FROM THE OTHERS — APPLE SEEDLINGS — THEIR TREATMENT, SEPARATING, AND PREPARING THE SEED — APPARATUS — SPROUTING — SOWING — CULTIVATION — SEED- LINGS — TREATMENT — SORTING — PACKING. All propagation of plants must depend upon the devel- opment of sceds or of buds, and all will arise from the growth and extension of cells. The seed and the bud are much more nearly related than a casual observer would at PROPAGATION. 53 first sight suppose. The early phylologists thought they discovered that in the seed was enwrapped the image of the future tree—a dissection of the seed would appear to demonstrate this. It is composed of separate parts which are capable of being developed into the root, stem, and appendages, but they have yet to be so developed; the several parts that we find in the seed are merely the repre- sentative parts. But the seed has the future of the tree within itself, it has certain qualities of the future tree im- pressed upon it in its primary organization, within the cap- sule of the fruit of the parent plant, so that in a higher sense the image of the future tree does exist within the seed. Within the bud, still more plainly and more dis- tinctly visible, is the future tree manifest, and we may pro- duce a tree from a bud as certainly as we do from a seed. Subjected to circumstances favorable for growth, the bud, as well as the seed, will emit roots, will form its stem, branches and appendages, and will become a tree; differing from the product of the seed only in this, that in thé lat- ter the resulting organism constitutes a new individual which may vary somewhat from its parent, in the former it is only a new development of a part of a previously ex- isting organization. The similarity existing between the two is exceedingly close, and is a matter of great impor- tance in horticultural operations. Dr. Lindley, in the Gardener’s Chronicle, says very truly, that “every bud ‘of a tree is an individual vegetable, and a tree, therefore, is a family or swarm of individual plants, like the polype with its young growing out of its sides, or like the branch- ing cells of the coral insect.” Similar opinions, more or less modified, have been expressed by subsequent physiol- 54 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. ogists, and are familiar to men of science in every country and, we may add, are also universally accepted as true by all who claim a right to express an opinion upon the sub- ject.—Men of science recognize the individuality of buds. —Nobody doubts the individuality of buds.—In a garden- ing aspect, the individuality of buds is the cardinal point upon which some of our most important operations turn ; such, for example, as all modes of propagation whatever, except by seed. If this be not fully understood, there is no possible explanation of the reasons why certain results are sure to follow the attachment of a bud, or the insertion of a graft, or the planting of a cutting, or the bending of a layer, or the approach of a scion, or the setting of an eye—our six great forms of artificial multiplication.” In his Elements of Botany, the same writer says; “An em- bryo is a young plant produced by the agency of the sex- es, and developed within a seed—a leaf bud is a young plant, produced without the agency of the sexes, enclosed within the rudimentary leaves called scales, and devel- oped on a stem.” “An embryo propagates the species, leaf-buds propagate the individual.” He shows each to be “a young plant developing itself upwards, downwards and horizontally, into stem, root, and medullary system.” Dr. Schleiden thus beautifully expresses his views of their individuality: ‘‘ Now the bud essentially is nothing more than a repetition of the plant on which it is formed. The foundation of a new plant consists equally of a stem and leaves, and the sole distinction is that the stem becomes intimately blended at its base with the mother plant in its growth, and has no free radical extremity like that exhib- ited by a plant developed from a seed. However, this PROPAGATION. 55 distinction is not so great as at the first glance it appears. Every plant of high organization possesses the power of shooting out adventitious roots from its stem, under the favoring influences of moisture; and very frequently, even plants that have been raised from seed, are forced to con- tent themselves with such adventitious roots, since it is the nature of many plants, for instance the grasses, never to develop their proper root, although the radicle is actually present. We are, it is true, accustomed to look upon the matter as though the buds must always be developed into twigs and branches, on and in connection with the plant itself; and thus in common life, we regard them as parts of a plant, and not as independent individuals, which they are in fact, although they, like children who remain in their paternal home, retain the closest connection with the plant on which they were produced. That they are at least capable of becoming independent plants, is shown by an experiment frequently successful when the neces- sary care is taken, namely the breaking off and sowing of the buds of our forest trees. The well-known garden operations of grafting and budding are also examples of this, and layering only differs from the sowing of the buds, in that the buds on the layers are allowed to acquire a certain degree of maturity before they are separated from the parent plant. All here depends upon the facility with which these bud plants root as it is called, that is develop adventitious roots, when they are brought in contact with moist earth, * * * Nature herself very often makes use of this method to multiply certain plants in incalculable numbers. In a few cases, the process resembles the arti- ficial sowing of buds, as when the plant spontaneously 56 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. throws off the perfect buds at a certain period; an in stance of this is afforded by some of our garden Lilies, which throw off the little bulb-like buds which appear in the axils of the lower leaves. The more common mode of proceeding is as follows: Those buds which have been formed near the surface of the soil, grow up into shoots provided with leaves; but the shoots are long, slender and delicate, the leaves too are stunted into little scales; in their axils, however, they develop strong buds, which either in the same or in the following year take root, and the slender shoot connecting them with the parent plant, dying and decaying, they become free independent plants. In this manner the strawberry soon covers a neglected garden.” * Upon the development of a cell in any living tissue, and its power of reproducing other cells, and upon its function of communicating by endosmosis and exosmosis with other like cells, depend all our success in propagating vegeta- bles, whether from seeds or buds, and parts containing these. We must study the circumstances that favor the development of cells, if we would be successful in prop- agating plants. Each bud being considered an individu- al, and capable, under favorable circumstances, of taking on a separate existence, we can multiply any individual variety indefinitely, and be sure of having the same quali- ties of foliage and fruit that we admire in the original, and that we may desire to propagate. This applies equally to a group of buds, as in cnttings, grafts and layers, etc.; but, more wonderful still, there are cells capable of developing buds where none existed before, and * The Plant, a Riography: M. J. Schleiden, p. 68. PROPAGATION. 57 even in tissues or parts of a plant where we do not usually find buds—hence we have a mode of propagation of many woody plants, by root cuttings, and by leaves, and even parts of leaves. Propacation By Cutrines.— Many fruits are multi- plied by this means. Healthy shoots of the previous year’s growth are usually selected and taken when the parent is in a dormant state, or still better, when it is ap- proaching this condition. Sometimes a small portion of the previous year’s growth is left with the cutting, making a sort of heel ; when this is not to be had, or not prefer- red, the slip is to be prepared for planting by cutting it smoothly just below a bud, as this seems to be the most favorable point in many plants for the emission of roots. Some plants will throw out radicles at any point indif- ferently along the internodes or merithalls. The prefer- ence for heel-cuttings depends upon the fact, that near the base of the annual shoot there are always a great num- ber of buds, many of which, however, being imperfectly developed, are inconspicuous, but though dormant, they seem to favor the emission of rootlets. Cuttings may be made to grow if taken at any period of their develop- ment, but when green and soft, they require particular conditions of heat and moisture in the soil, and atmosphere, that are only under the control of the professional gardener. They are usually taken in the dormant state, because they are then susceptible of being made to grow under the or- dinary conditions of out-door gardening. If cut early in the season, on the approach of autumn, after the wood- growth has been perfected, they may be planted at once with good prospect of success, or they may be put into the 3* 58 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. soil, out of doors, in the cellar, or in a cold frame or pit, and a very important step in the progress of their growth will commence at once. The leafless sticks are not dead, and whenever the temperature will admit of the quiet in- terchange of fluids among their cells, this curious function will go on, and will be accompanied by the development or generation of new cells that soon cover the cut surfaces, constituting what the gardeners call the callus, This is the first step toward growth, and it most readily occurs when the earth is warmer than the air; hence the value of fall planting, whether of trees or of cuttings, if done be fore the earth has been chilled, and hence also, the impor- tance of bottom heat in artificial propagation. If on the contrary the air be warm and the ground cold, the buds are often stimulated to burst forth, before the rootlets can have started. The expanding foliage which so delights the tyro in propagation, offers an extended surface for evaporation, the contained juices of the cutting itself are soon exhausted, no adequate supply is furnished, and the hopeful plant soon withers, or damps off, and dies.* The cutting, like the seed, must have “first the root, then the blade.” The length of time that is allowed for cuttings to prepare for rooting, if they are designed for spring plant- ing, should be as great as possible, and the circumstances under which they are kept should be such as to favor the development of the cells, so that roots may form frecly with the breaking of the buds, if not before. ._ Root-cuttings should be made in the spring, just before the usual period of the bursting of the buds in the plant to be propagated. The tendency to develop buds appears * Because it had no root, it withered away. Mat. 13, 6. \ PROPAGATION, 59 to be then most active. Gentle bottom heat, though not ‘essential, is still very desirable, and will conduce to the success of the operation. Some plants are best prop- agated by this means, and those too, which never. natur- ally produce suckers, may often be successfully grown by sections of the roots. All plants do not equally admit of propagation by division as cuttings, some woody tissues refusing to emit roots under almost any circum. stances. Nobody thinks of propagating the stone fruits, such as the cherry, plum, peach, or apricot, by attempting to plant cuttings, and yet some of these will emit roots very free- ly, as we may often observe when the shoots or trimmings are used as supports for plants in the green-house. The plum free is exceedingly apt to form new roots when planted too deeply, and upon this fact depends the success or failure of the finer varieties when worked upon certain varieties of the wild stock. Ifthe young trees are earthed up in the nursery, and set rather deeply in the orchard, they will soon establish a good set of roots of their own, emitted above the junction of the scion and stock, which is very preferable to the imperfect union and consequent enlargement that often results from using uncongenial stocks. The raspberry and blackberry do not grow so well from cuttings of the wood, which is always biennial in this genus, as they do from root-cuttings. In some parts of the country, peaches are mainly pro- duced, or,the favorite varieties are multiplied, by planting the sprouts that come from the base of the trunk of the trees; these have little or no roots when taken off with the mattock, but they soon establish themselves and make 60 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. good trees, bearing fruit like their parents, in soils and climate that are well adapted to this fruit. Refined and scientific horticulture has been extensively applied to the multiplication of the grape, which is now produced in immense numbers, from single eyes, or buds. Formerly our vineyards were formed by planting long cuttings at once in the field in the stations to be occupied by the vines, or by setting them first in a nursery, whence they were transplanted to the vineyard, when one or two years old. Only the most refractory kinds, which would not grow readily in the field, or such as were yet rare, were propagated from cuttings, by using the single eye and artificial bottom heat. Now, however, the appliances of our propagators are called upon for the production of grape-vines by the million, and they find it advisable to multiply all the varieties in this manner. The propagation of the grape by using single eyes affords the most beanti- ful illustration of the subject of the individuality of buds, and though denounced by some as an unnatural; steam- forcing process, it is really an evidence of the advance of horticulture, since every step is supported by a philosoph- ical reason, and the whole process, to be successful, is de- pendent upon the application to practice of well established scientific truths. It has already been stated that the first effect of cell- growth upon a cutting, is the production of a callus. This callus may form upon any cut surface, or even where the bark has been abraded. It is the first effort of nature to repair an injury by the reproduction of new parts; it is most generally found at the base of the cutting, but un- der favorable circumstances, it will be seen also at the up- PROPAGATION. 61 per end of the shoot if this has been placed in contact with the earth. Cuttings will sometimes be set up-side down, when we find the callus upon the smaller end, and roots will be emitted from that portion whence we should have expected to see the branches issue. Upon this fact, and to multiply the chances of living, has becn based the French method, as it is called, or that of inserting both ends of the cuttings. The common mode, (fig. 1), is to. - _ 77 Fe Y jj Wil) Vi Fig. 1.—FRENCH AND COMMON MODES OF SETTING CUTTINGS. set the cuttings in a slanting direction in the ground, so placed that the upper eye or bud only shall reach the sur- face. Formerly there was a preference for long cuttings, and these were often made eighteen inches or more in length. The practice with most of our cultivators has been modified in this particular, and they have reduced the length of the slips to six and eight inches, so as to have in grape wood about three or four cyes. Some have gone still further, and use but two, even for out-door planting of the grape, and some have been very success- ful when using but a single joint. The Germans have ad- vocated longer cuttings, upon the theory that there was a retroaction in the pith of the internodes and in all the buds of the cutting, upon the lower point, enabling it to push roots more strongly from a long than from a short 62 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. cutting. This theory has for its support the fact, that there is in such a cutting a larger Amount of organizable matter to be developed into the new parts to be produced, and certainly, if neglected, short cuttings will be very apt to suffer from drought, but in practice, it is found that the short cutting plants have better roots, which are near the surface, and even those plants, grown from single eyes, are better furnished than long cuttings produced upon the old plan, which placed the roots deep in the soil. Fig. 2.—ONE-EYE CUTTINGS OF THE GRAPE. There are various methods of preparing the single-eye cuttings, some of which are represented in fig. 2. Among our cultivated fruits there is but a limited num- ber that need to be propagated by cuttings, though, where it becomes necessary, many of them may be grown in this manner, to which procedure there are no serious objec- tions, though there are some of a theoretical nature. The currant and the gooseberry are increased almost exclusively PROPAGATION. 63 from cuttings, they strike root very readily, and are multi- plied to any extent; their seeds are sown only to produce new varieties. The grape is propagated very extensively by cuttings; the slips are often planted in the field and in the stations where the vines are wanted for the vine- yard; but some varieties are so unsatisfactory in their re- sults, that other more elaborate and scientific means must be taken for their propagation. Among the larger fruits, those constituting our trees, we do not depend upon cut- tings, except in the quince, which is not only grown for its fruit, but is also largely produced as a stock for the dwarfed pear, and is extensively propagated from cuttings. The Paradise apple, a dwarf stock, is multiplied in the same way. Pears and apples may be grown from cuttings, . but this plan is not pursued with them to any extent. Those that are root-grafted, or budded very low, especi- ally the pear on quince stocks, will often produce roots if favorably situated, but there is a great difference in var rieties, some rarely produce a root, while others are very prone to do it; from observations of this fact, a new phase of dwarf:pear culture has been inaugurated. SuckEers.—One of the simplest methods of multiplying varieties consists of increasing and encouraging the suck- ers thrown up by the roots; these are separated and set out for trees. We have been told by some physiologists that there was an absolute difference in structure between the root and the stem, that they could not be substituted the one for the other; and yet the oft quoted marvel of the tree which was planted upside down, and which produced flowers and leaves from its roots, while its branches emit- ted fibres, and became true roots, is familiar to every one. 64 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. Here, as in other cases, our teachers have led us into er- ror by attempting to trace analogy with animal anatomy and physiology, and by directing our attention to the cir- culation of plants, as though they, like the higher animals, possessed true arterial and venous currents of circulating fluids. The cell circulation is quite a different affair, and can be conducted in either direction, as every gardener knows who has ever layered a plant, or set a cutting upside down. So with the roots—they are but downward ex- tensions of the stem; under ordinary circumstances they have no need for buds, but these may be, and often are developed, when the necessity for their presence arises. Buds do exist on roots, especially upon those that are horizontal and near the surface, and from them freely spring suckers, which are as much parts of the parent tree as ‘its branches, and may be planted with entire certainty of obtaining the same fruit, just as the twigs when used as cuttings, or scions, when grafted,-will produce similar results. “ Whole orchards are planted, in some sections of the country, with the suckers from old trees; apples, pears, plums, and even peaches, as well as raspberries and black- berries, are multiplied in this primitive way. There are some varieties of apples that have been so propagated for half a century, and extended for hundreds of miles in this way by the pioneer emigrants, without ever having been grafted, until their merits have at length accidentally be- come known to the Pomological Societies and nurserymen, when the propagation of them by grafting soon super- cedes the more primitive method. Sucker trees are ob- jected to upon the grounds that they are not healthy and PROPAGATION. 65 thrifty, that they do not have good roots. Inherent dis- ease of the parent tree will of course be transmitted with its other peculiarities, but I cannot imagine that this would be any more likely to occur in a sucker than in a layer, or cutting, or graft. As to the roots, they may be more de- veloped upon one side than another in the young tree, and this state of things may continue in the adult; we often observe the same condition in the stumps of the monarchs of our forests, which were never suspected in the day of their glory and pride of having such a fault. But such a condition of roots is not essential to the sucker, which may be made to have as fine a system of lateral roots, and as evenly and regularly distributed as those of a seedling tree. Another objection to this mode of propagation has much truth and some force; that is, that suckers are very apt to produce suckers again. This is particularly the case with the Morello cherry, which is a favorite stock, upon which to work many of the choice va- rieties. As an offset to this it may be urged, that the small fibrous roots, which are supposed to conduce to early fruitfulness, abound in trees propagated by this means, and this may be the reason why the fruit trees that have been thus multiplied, are very generally re- markable for their precocious fruiting. Some of the apples that have been long increased in this manner, bear so early, and so bountifully, as to prevent them from ever forming very large trees; they often have a stunted ap- pearance, and not infrequently present a peculiar inequal- ity upon the bark, portions being swollen or enlarged like warts—from which, in some cases, it is easy to force out shoots or sprouts; they are indeed true gemmules like 66 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. those of the old olive trees, and like them might be used for the propagation of the variety; a similar condition, no doubt, exists in the roots, whence the tendency to sucker. The common Morello cherry; the Damson; the Chickasas, and other varieties of plum; the blackberry, and many raspberries, are multiplied almost exclusively in a similar manner. Layers are portions of the branches of a plant that have been induced to throw out roots, and which can thus set up an independent existence if removed from the parent tree. This mode of propagation is a very natural one, and was probably an accidental discovery. In its traits, it is the reverse of the mode we have just been consider- ing. Here the branch emits roots, instead of the root emitting branches, as in the case of the sucker. Layering is frequently resorted to as a mode of propagation, it ise very simple, easily performed, and, with some species, very certain in its results. Some plants will root readily if merely placed in contact with the ground, or very slightly covered with soil; others require some artificial interfer- ence, such as ringing, or twisting, or slitting. “The rasp- berry, known as the Rubus occidentalis, or Black-cap, be- longs to the first class, and it even places itself in contact with the soil by recurving its branches so as to bring the tips to the earth, where they strike root, and make new plants. The grape comes under the second category, needing only a little assistance, and it is multiplied to a considerable extent in this manner. In the spring, the vines are laid out in a little shallow trench, and pegged down closely; as the buds burst, they throw up shoots which are trained vertically by tying them to sticks, and PROPAGATION. 67 as soon as these shoots have acquired a certain degree of maturity and firmness, the mellow earth is drawn up to them and they emit a beautiful system of roots, and by the fall they form very fine plants, (fig. 3). The layered Fig. 3.—PROPAGATING THE GRAPE BY LAYERING. branch is then taken up and the several plants are separat- ed, when it will be found that the best roots are chiefly from the lower joints of the new wood, rather than from the old canes that were laid down in the spring. Fig. 4.—LAYERING THE QUINCE, Quinces are considerably increased by a sort of layer- ing, as the twigs emit roots very freely ; they are often bent down, slightly twisted, or not, as the case may be, and covered with mellow soil, when they readily emit roots, 68 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. become firmly established, and may be set out by them- selves, (fig. 4). There is, however, another method of lJay- ering, much practiced in the multiplication of the quince; that called propagation by stools. The plants are set in open rows, four feet wide, and three or four feet apart in the rows; they should be so planted as to stand be- low the general surface, that is in trenches. When cut off at the ground in the spring, they throw up a great number of shoots, and the earth is gradually worked up to these to en- Fig. 5.—STOOL LAYERING THE QUINCE. courage their rooting, (see figure 5), which is often sufficient for removal the first season ; if, on inspection, the roots are not found to be sufficiently large or abundant, the earthing is continued until the autumn of the next year, when they arevremov- ed, the stools trimmed of their lower roots, and reset in new trenches. The plants, thus raised from stools, are cut back severely, and are then ready to set out in nursery rows for budding. With the quince, cultivated in this manner, nothing is required but to accumulate the mel- low earth about the shoots; but in many plants it is necessary to notch the wood by splitting, or cutting it for an inch or two, (as in fig. 6), making a tongue that sepa- rates from the lower portion of the shoot, and from which the roots are emitted. This slit should be commenced just below a bud, and the knife is drawn upward, cutting half. way through the wood. If commenced at one side instead PROPAGATION. 69 of at the depending portion, the tongue is more sure to be separated from the stock, to which it might otherwise reunite. To insure rooting, some persons insert a little stick or chip between the separated portions, to prevent a re-union of the parts. The shoot, after being notched, is fastened down, and fine soil or compost is brought about it to encourage the development of roots. Few of the hard wooded fruit trees have been extensively prop- St oe ie - “4 Cae NN Fig. 6.—MANNER OF CUTTING AND PEGGING DOWN A LAYER agated by means of layers; they might be so produced, but it has not been found profitable nor necessary. A very common opinion prevails that layering exhausts the mother plant, or vine, which is used in this mode of prepagating. If properly conducted, there is no reason why this should be; but if the whole top of any plant is bent down and made to take root, and to form independent roots, there can be little or no return from the branches to the original stock to strengthen it. A certain amount of healthy growing wood should always be left in its natural position, and no danger to the plant need be apprehended. The wood growth of the strawberry, when allowed to 70 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. take its natural bent, is directed into the stolons or run- ners, which form natural layers. Their production de tracts from the central wood-growth of the plant, and exhausts its strength to such a degree, that it often dies, whereas, by a constant removal of the runners, as fast as they appear, we practice a sort of summer pruning or pinching, which results in the production of a large.branch- ing stool, with many points or centers for the production of foliage and flowers, and thus insure the greatest abun- dance of fruit. The strawberry, like one species of the raspberry, and many other of our native plants, offers il- lustrations of natural layering. Sreps.—The most common as well as the most natural mode of multiplying the individual plants of most of our fruit trees, is by sowing the seed; from this source we procure stocks upon which are worked, by budding or grafting, the several varieties we may desire to propagate. As an illustration of this process, I propose to speak of apple seedlings. . The almost universal means of increasing the number of apple trees, is by sowing the seed. This is generally selected and separated from the fresh pomace left on the press in cider-making. The old and slow process of hand- washing has given way, in this age of labor-saving ma- chinery, to more economical methods. The most approved Apparatus is constructed upon the principle of separating the seeds from the pulp by means of their greater specific gravity; it is, indeed, much like a gold washer, being a series of boxes or troughs through which a current of wa- ter is made to flow; this carries the lighter portions away from the seeds, the contents of the boxes being agitated PROPAGATION, 71 from time to time. At the close of the process, the clean seed is found in the bottoms of the boxes, whence it is re- moved and carefully dried, by putting it in an airy place, and stirring it frequently to prevent mildew and fermen- tation. Well prepared seed is plump and bright, and should feel col to the hand. When the pips are broken, they should be white and clear within ; but the best test of their quality, is to sprout a portion, and count the-plants produced by a given number of seeds. Sowrne.—The seeds may be put into the ground, either in the fall, or spring. The soil having been well prepared, and deeply pulverized, is thrown up in beds a few feet wide, and the seed sown in close drills across; or without the beds, it may be sown in broad drills, by hand, or with a machine, the rows at such a distance as to allow of cul- ture by horse-power. It is desirable, in either case, to get an early start and a good stand; the weeds must be kept under from the very first, and not allowed to have the mastery for a single day. Thorough culture during the season, upon a deeply tilled soil, of such a character as to retain moisture, will be found highly advantageous in the production of this crop, and will insure immunity from leaf-blight and other adversities. Some recommend sprouting the seed a little before planting. If it have been kept during the winter mixed with its bulk of sand, which is a good plan, the whole may be subjected toa gentle heat as in a hot-bed, for a few days, just before planting. During this time the mass must be stirred and turned every day, to prevent fermentation and to secure ~ an even start. Whenever the germ makes its appearance at the points of the seeds, which is called pipping, the 72 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. sowing must begin, and should be done as quickly as pos- sible; the covering is to be slight, and the earth should be friable and not disposed to bake. The depth at which the apple seed is to be covered will depend upon the pres- ent and prospective state of the weather, lighter if moist, heavier if dry, for a continued drouth might be fatal to sprouted seed, if it were planted too near the surface; but when.the weather is not dry, it is advised that the shallower the seed is sown, the better. The objection.has been made to sprouting, that if the process have advanced too far, the seedlings will be apt to have a crook at or near the collar, instead of the straight fusiform appear- ance they should possess when presented to the grafter. These seedlings furnish the stocks upon which to work the finer varieties of the apple. They are taken up in the autumn with their long clean roots, which are often longer than their tops, the leaves are stripped off, and they are assorted; the larger are packed away in earth or saw-dust in the grafting department, or heeled-in out of daors, and covered in such a way as to be accessible at any time they may be needed during the winter. The smaller stocks are heeled-jn for spring planting in nursery rows for bud- ding, or they may be left in the original rows for another year’s growth as seedlings. If the plants have been well grown and not too thick, so that the majority are of suffi- cient size, it will be better to take them all up at once and assort them as just indicated, otnerwise the largest only may be drawn separately when the ground is soft with autumnal rains, leaving the smaller seedlings for another year’s growth. In assorting and selling the stocks, nurs-- erymen make about three classes. The very largest, as PROPAGATION. 3 thick as a lead-pencil, are called extra, or two-year old, and command a higher price. The next size, called 1st class stocks, are large enough for co-aptation to the aver- age scions, and long enough to make two cuts each for grafting ; and those that fall below this requisition are considered second class, and are either thrown aside or set out for budding, and for stock or collar-grafting in the rows. 4 PROPAGATION.—SECTION II.—GRAFTING. A MODIFICATION OF CUTTINGS— SUCCESS DEPENDANT UPON CELL- GROWTH — FORMING A UNION WITH THE STOCK-— LIMITS TO GRAFT- ING DEPENDANT UPON THE ANATOMY OF THE PLANT — PHYSIOLOGI- CAL BOUNDS - SUCCESS IS IN PROPORTION TO THE AFFINITY — SEVERAL SPECIES AS STOCKS — DISTINCT GENERA -— NARROW LIMITS — REQUISITES — EFFECTS OF UNCONGENIAL STOCKS — NATURAL GRAFTING 18 INARCHING—GRAFTING BY APPROACH — VARIOUS METHODS OF GRAFTING — WHIP, CLEFT, SADDLE, SIDE, ETC — ILLUS- TRATIONS — TYING, WAXING, ETC — RE-GRAFTING OLD ORCHARDS — RENEW SUCCESSIVE PORTIONS OF THE TREE; TOP FIRST — GRAFTING MACHINES — ROOT-GRAFTING — PREPARATION OF THE SCIONS — OF THE ROOTS — PRESERVATION OF THE GRAFTS — DiVISION QF LABOR —DIFFEKENT PORTIONS OR SECTIONS OF TIE ROOTS — STOCK- GRAFTING — GRAFTING-WAX — SEASONS FOR — PRULONGED — SELEC- TION OF SCIONS— TIME FOR CUTTING— MODE OF PRESERVING — TREATMENT OF GRAFTS. GraFtine is but a modification of propagation by cut- tings. The scion is a cutting of the variety we wish to propagate, which, instead of being committed to the ground to emit its own roots, is placed in contact with tissres of a nature similar to its own, through which it is to forma connection with the roots and the soil. The success of the operation depends upon the formative cell in this instance also, as in the cutting; new cells arc PROPAGATION. . formed upon the cut surface, and the intercommunication takes place through them. Hence we have anatomical limits to grafting; there are physiological bounds beyond which we cannot pass, in our combinations of scion and stock, Our success is in the direct ratio of the affinity that exists between them ; thus apple grows best on apple, and even among these we find the closest union and the best results, where there is a similiarity between the style of growth, and probably in the character of the cells. We say, as a general rule, that stone fruits must be grafted upon stone fruits, those bearing seeds, upon seed fruit ; but there are limits even here which confine us up- on one hand, and give us more latitude upon the other. Thus the cherry may be worked upon the wild cherry (Prunus Virginiana,) but it forms a very poor union; the pear will grow upon the thorn, which has a very different seed, but the union is very imperfect and the tree is short- lived; the apple would appear to be much nearer of kin, since it belongs to the same genus, but though the pear will grow vigorously upon this stock, it is no more per- manent than upon the thorn: either of them will answer when graftéd low, or in the root, to start the cutting, as the scion may then be considered, and to sustain it until it shall have supplied itself with roots. In top-grafting the pear upon a tree of either species, it is found essential to success, and it conduces to the greater durability of the tree, for some branches of the original stock to be left in- tact to secure the circulation of the trunk, as the union of the dissimilar cells is so imperfect that it does not furnish sufficient vent for the sap. In the case of the cherry we find that the varieties appear to have a greater affinity 76 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. for those of their own race; thus the Dukes and Morellos do well when grafted upon the Morello stocks, whereas the Hearts and Biggarrean sorts do not make a good union’ upon these stocks, but prefer the Mazzard, which has a freer growth more like their own. Most varieties will do well upon the Mahaleb stock, which is used as a means of dwarfing this fruit, though not a dwarf. Upon the wild cherry, which belongs to quite a different section of the genus, the cultivated varieties will grow, but they form a very imperfect union. The peach may be worked upon the plum stock, and is claimed to be somewhat dwarfed by it, and to produce superior fruit. This stock is more congenial to the apricot, which is frequently propagated upon it. Both plums and apricots may be worked upon the peach stock, and they will grow very vigorously, as they will upon the wild plum, but they soon over-grow, and are very apt to break off. When either of these species is used as a stock for the plum or apricot, they should be considered merely as a nursing mother, like the apple or thorn to the pear, which may be wanted to help the cut- ting until it shall be prepared to stand alone, and feed it- self from its own roots. In other words, they should be grafted, not budded, into these uncongenial stocks, and the operation should be performed in the collar or below it, in the root, so that the growing scion may be earthed up, and enaouraged to furnish itself with a good system of roots of its own. The success will then depend upon the ability of the scion to emit roots freely. We must never forget that in grafting, we are confined to very narrow limits. Our scion must be of a similar PROPAGATION. att nature with the stock, each must have cells of a similar character, capable of transmitting their nutritious fluids from one to the other. We must recollect likewise, that the parts must be so co-apted that the cells of wood growth shall be brought into as close connection as pos- sible, in both scion and stock; these cells are found in the layer, called the cambium, which is between the wood and the bark. The crude sap from below will often pass from cell to cell, when the elaborated sap of the cells in the scion is wholly unfitted for the formation of wood cells in the stock below it; of course the union in such a case must be very imperfect, and the product of such a graft- ing will be subject to accident, and will be short-lived, though the result in fruit, while the union continues, may be very precocious, abundant, and of superior flavor. Natural grafting may often be observed by the student of nature when wandering among his favorites of the sylvan shades. There can be no doubt that the first hint was thus communicated to the early gardeners. Innature we always find the grafting to be inarching, or grafting by approach; two limbs or even two trees approximating closely, have abraded one another, and have afterward united their tissues most firmly together. This is gener- ally a union of two trees of the same variety or species ; but such is not always the case; sometimes trees of very dissimilar natures unite in this manner, but when we ex- amine them we find only a dove-tailing, only a mechanical union, but no vital action subsists between them. The ancients give us some fancy sketches of the unions by grafting of very dissimilar trees, and some moderns who have no higher claim tv poetry than their romancing, tell vis) AMERICAN POMOLOGY. us that we may graft the peach upon the Willow and But- tonwood, and form other equally impossible unions. The different methods of performing the operation of grafting vary with the character and size, and condition of the stocks to be worked; thus we have splice grafting, whip, cleft, saddle, and side grafting with modifications, and also grafting by approach, which is generally called inarching —though sometimes also practiced where we desire to renew the roots of a tree that are un- healthy, or to restore those sat that have been removed by § accident or by the erosion fH of some rodent animals. | Seuice Grarrine is the \@ simplest process, and is appli- M] cable only where the size of ] the stock and of the scion cor- respond pretty nearly; the two are cut with a sloping curve, each of which being made at the same angle, will cvincide with the other when they are applied together, as represented in the engraving, fig. 7. Wuir Grartine is a modification of Fig. eee crarr- the above. Each portion is cut in a slop- ING. ing manner as in the splice grafting, but each is also split with a thin-bladed knife, as represented in fig. 8. The object in this is to give a firmer union to the two portions, and also to present a more extended surface for the effusion of the new cell tissue that is to PROPAGATION. 9 form the bond of union in cementing them together. In both these methods, byt especially in the first, the parts must be held together in co-aptation by some kind of bandage; this is generally composed of grafting wax, spread upon cloth or paper, or even, as now extensively practiced, upon fine thread. Cotton yarn No. 3 is drawn through melted grafting wax, and as it cools, it is wound Fig. 9.—DIFFERENT STEPS IN CLEFT GRAFTING. A, SCION PREPARED FOR SETTING. B, THE CLEFT OPENED BY A WEDGE. C, THE SCION IN- SERTED. D, SECTION OF STOCK AND SCION TO SHOW THE CO-APTA- TION OF THE PARTS OF THE TWO. upon a reel at the other side of the room, whence it is drawn as wanted by the grafter or tyer. Tying or wrap- ping is always a good precaution, and when the splice or cleft. graft is not very close, it becomes necessary; but thousands of grafts will unite equally well where the parts are covered with earth, without any such appliance. Cierr GraFtine is generally done when the stock is larger than the scion, and also where the operation is per- 80 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. formed at a point above the ground. The stock is split downward, after having been cut oft at the point where the grafting is to be done. The knife should be sharp, and the bark should be cut through first, to avoid its being torn, and so that the sides of the cleft shall be smooth. A wedge is inserted to keep the cleft open for the inser- tion of the scion, which is cut on each side like a fine wedge; but the two planes not being parallel, the bark will be left on one side to the very point of the wedge, while on the other it will be removed a part of the way, making a feather edge, A, fig. 9. The object of this is to have the pressure of the cleft greatest upon the outer side, where the union is to be effected. It is well to have a bud on the strip of bark left between the two cuts used in forming the graft, this should be near the top of the cleft. One or two grafts may be inserted into a cleft, or more clefts may be made, in Fig. 10.—cLEFT Jarge stocks, or in re-grafting the large GRAFTING WITH potu gcrons 1x- limbs of an old tree, but usually one is CLINED INWARD. sufficient to leave growing; and in the young tree, only one should ever be allowed to remain. When the scion is nicely set into the cleft, so that the in- ner bark of the stock and graft shall coincide, or rather cross a very little, (sée fig. 10,) the wedge, whether of hard wood, or of iron, should be gently withdrawn, and then the elasticity of the stock will hold the scion firmly to its place; this pressure should not be too severe. In PROPAGATION. 81 this kind of grafting, if the pressure be sufficiently firm, and if the operation have been performed below the sur- face of the ground, it may not be nec- essary to make any other application than to press the moist earth about the parts, and cover all but the top of the graft with soil, and place a stick to in- dicate the plant and protect it from in- jury. If, on the contrary, the pressure of the cleft be not sufficient to hold the scion firmly, as in small stocks, the graft must be tied. For this a piece of bass matting, or cotton twine, may be used; and if the operation chas been performed above ground, the whole must be covered Fig. 11.—s1DE GRAFT- with grafting "ING. wax, applied, ei- ther hot with a brush, or cold, after having been worked with the hands, or by wrapping with strips of mus- lin or paper previously spread with the wax. In old times grafting clay was used, and applied with the . hands as a lump around the june- tion; but this disagreeable and clumsy appliance has given way to more elegant and convenient arrangements. Fig, 12.—srpe GRAFTING— THE STOCK NOT CUT BACK. Swe Grartine is performed in two ways. In one it is a modification of cleft grafting in which there is no cleft, 4* 82 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. but the bark is started from the wood, and the scion, cut as shown in figure 11, is pressed down between the wood and bark. This can only be done late in the spring, after the sap has begun to flow in the stock, so that the bark will run; it is indeed more like budding than grafting. The other modification is done without cutting off the stock. The knife is applied to the side of a stock of me- dium size, and a cut is made downward and extending to Fig. 18. — Two FoRMS OF SIDE GRAFTING. — A, B, THE SCION AND STOCK FOR THE RICHARD SIDE GRAFT. 0, STOCK FOR THE GIRARDIN SIDE GRAFT. .D, SCION, AND Z, FRUIT BUD FOR THE SAME. one-third the diameter, fig. 12; the scion is cut as for cleft grafting, and inserted so as to have the parts well co-apted, and then secured as usual. This plan is useful where there is danger of too free a flow of sap from the roots. Two other kinds of side graft are shown in fig. 13 The left-hand figures show the Richard side graft, in which PROPAGATION. 83 an arched branch, A, is used. This is inserted under the bark of the stock, B ; above the graft an incision is made in the stock down to the wood, to arrest the flow of sap. After the insertion, the wound is covered with grafting wax. The Girardin side graft is illustrated at the three right-hand figures. A fruit bud, Z, or a graft with a terminal fruit bud, D, is inserted under the bark of the stock, C, in August, or whenever suitable buds can be obtained and the bark will run. The wound is tied and covered with wax, as be- fore. The object of this grafting is to secure immediate fruitage. Another kind of side grafting con- sists in plunging a dirk-shaped knife directly through the tree, in- clining the point downward, into this opening the graft is insgrted; the object being to establish a limb on a naked portion of the trunk. SappLeE GRaFTine is used only with stocks of small size; it is per- a gs ae oe formed by making a double slope upon the stock, and by opening a corresponding space in the graft, by cutting two slopes in the scion, from below upwards, so that they shall meet in the centre, as seen in fig. 14. Some merely split the scion. GraFtine BY APPROACH, or as it is generally termed, inarching, is often practiced where there is difficulty in making the scion unite with the stock; it is not often needed in the culture of our orchard fruits, but may be 84 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. here described. The stock upon which we wish to graft the scion, must be planted near the variety or species to be increased. A small twig of the latter, which can be brought close to the stock, is selected for the operation ; a slice of bark and wood is then removed from the twig, and another of equal size from the stock, so managed, that these cut surfaces can be brought together and secured in that position until they have united, after which the twig, that has been used as a scion, is cut from its parent tree, and the top of the stock is carefully reduced until the scion has sufficiently developed itself to act as the top of the ingrafted tree, which may afterward be transplanted to its proper station. A modification of this grafting by approach, is, howev- er, sometimes of great service, where we have a valuable tree that has suffered from disease in the roots, or from in- jury to them. It consists in planting some thrifty young stocks, with good roots, about the base of the tree, after having prepared the ground by thorough digging, und by the addition of good soil if necessary. These stocks are then inserted upwards into the healthy portion of the trunk, by the process of side grafting reversed or invert- ed, or by the usual method of inarching. Rine Grarrine of Bark GRAFTING is not much used, and in small stocks it is rather a kind of budding, for then aring of bark is removed at the proper season of year, generally about midsummer, and it is replaced by a similar ring of bark from a shoot of the same size, taken from a tree of the variety to be propagated; this ring of bark must be furnished with a healthy bud. This method has little to recommend it, and can only be applied when both PROPAGATION, 85 the stock and the scion are in a growing condition, so that the bark will run freely; care also must be exercised to avoid injuring the eye of the bud, in peeling off the ring. A modification of bark grafting may be applied with great advantage, however, to an old tree, that has met with an injury to a portion of its bark. The injured part, should be pared smoothly to the sound bark and wood., This may be done with a sloping cut, or. the edge may be made abrupt and, square with a chisel and mallet; a piece of fresh wood and bark is then to be cut from a healthy tree and fitted pre- cisely to the fresh wound, and secured in its place with bandages, and graft- ing clay or wax is then applied, thus making what the surgeons would call a sort of taliacotian operation. Instead of a single piece of wood and bark, a number of young shoots may be used “to make the communication coniplete; vy. these are set close together and secured si 6 Ai ~ in the uswal manner; see fig. 15. vase Fie 13 aoe GR Re-crarmne OLrp Orcuarps. — Old ine, TO REParn an OFchards of inferior fruit may be entire- INJURED TREE. ly re-made and re-formed by graft- ing the limbs with such varieties as we may desire. A new life is by this process often infused into the trees, which is due to the very severe pruning which the trees then receive; they are consequently soon covered with a vigorous growth of young healthy wood, which replaces the decrepid and often decaying spray that accumulates in an old orchard, and the fruit produced for several 86 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. years by the new growth is not only more valuable in kind, according to the judgment used in the selection of grafts, but itis more fair, smooth and healthy, and of bet- ter size than that which was previously furnished by the trees. Certain varieties are brought at once into bearing when thus top-grafted, which would have been long in de- veloping their fruitful condition if planted as nursery trees. Others are always better and finer when so worked, than on young trees. Some of the finest specimens of the Northern Spy apple, exhibited at the fairs, have been pro- duced by grafts inserted into the terminal branches of old bearing trees. There is a theory held by some orchard- ists, that the further the junction of the graft with the stock is removed from the root, the better will be the fruit. This, however, is not well supported, and the cir cumstance, when observed, is probably dependent upon other causes. In renewing an old orchard by grafting its head, it will not be a good plan to attempt the whole tree at once; the pruning would be too severe, and would be followed by a profusion of succulent shoots breaking out from the large branches, such as are called water-sprouts. Those who have practiced most, prefer at first, to remove about one- third of the limbs for grafting, and those should be selected at the top of the tree. The new growth thus has an open field for its development, and the lower limbs will be invigorated, while they tend also to preserve the equilibrium of the tree in a double sense, physically and physiologically. The next year anotffer third of the limbs may be grafted, and the remainder the year following, as practiced by Mr. Geo. Olmstead, of Connecticut, who, on PROPAGATION. 87 the sixth year from the first grafting, harvested 284 bush- els of choice apples from a single tree that was 75 years old, and which before only produced inferior fruit. J. J. . Thomas recommends, “to give a well-shaped head to such newly formed trees, and to prevent the branches from shooting upward in a close body near the centre of the tree; that the old horizontal boughs should be allowed to extend to a distance in each direction, while the upright Saee sat, CEN, tas Fig. 16.—RENEWAL OF THE TOP OF AN OLD TREE. ones should be lopped ;” see fig. 16. The same writer also advises, “instead of cutting off large branches and graft- ing them at once, it is better to prune the top in part, which will cause an emission of vigorous shoots. These are then. budded, or grafted. * * * And as the grafts gradually:extend by growth, the remainder of the top may, by successive.excisions, be entirely removed.” GRaFTInG IN THE NoursEry is either done at or near the collar of the stock, or it is performed in-doors upon the 88 AMERICAN POMOLOG roots or sections of roots of young stocks. The latter may be first described, as it constitutes the most extensive means of multiplying fruit trees. It is a sort of ma- chinery, with division of labor, and appliances, that enable the operators to turn out immense numbers. Machinery has indeed been applied to the business; we have grafting apparatus to facilitate the work. The Minkler machine consists of a frame or guage which regulates the angle of the slope, which is cut with a broad chisel that reduces the roots and scions to a condition for putting them to gether; by its use an immense number of grafts can be cut, and another hand binds them together with the waxed thread, without any tie. Mr. Robey’s machine consists of a complicated shears to cut the slope and tongue at one operation, preparing the pieces for whip grafting. Mr. S. 8S. Jackson, of Cincinnati, has also invented an apparatus for this purpose, which proves to be very useful. Roor Grarrme.—The methods of performing the opera- tion vary somewhat, but all agree in the object to be attain- ed: the co-aptation of the scion with a piece of root. Some grafters use only the upper portion of the root, thinking the original collar of the seedling stock the only point at which the most perfect and successful union between the aérial and terrestrial portions of trees should or can be effected — theoretically this may be very well, but the practice constantly pursued, in myriads of cases, abun- dantly proves that the grafting need not be restricted to this part, and that a perfect union may be effected at any point of the root, and that this may even be inverted. The very common practice has been to take two or more cuts from the root, when it is of sufficient size and length; PROPAGATION, 89. and though some of our best propagators restrict them- selves to two cuts from each, others, who have experi- mented carefully, insist that the third section will average as well as the others. : | Broadwell, Golden Sweet, Paradise Winter, Ramedell Sweet, Sweet June, Sweet Nonesuch. Sweet apples arranged in succession for stock. Those marked 7 are also fine for the dessert ; those marked B. are superior for baking: Hightop, B. Bough, 7. Golden Sweeting, B. Victuals and Drink, B. 7. Jersey Sweet. Lyman’s Pumpkin, B. Bailey Sweet, B. 7. Ramsdell’s, B. Mote’s Sweet, B. 7. Stillwater Sweeting, B. Higby Sweet, B. Dr. Watson, 7. Molasses, Fall Queen, B. 7. Buckingham, Baltimore, Fallawater, Michael Henry, *My friends write that they would have preferred more of these sorta, and that they planted such trees a8 were at hand at that time. ‘ t Ohio Cultivator, vol. v1, page 269. 710 AMERICAN POMOLOGY. Broadwell, 7. B. Sweet Bellflower, Sweet Janet, B. London Sweet, B. Winter Sweet Paradise, 7. B. Jersey Black, Ladies’ Sweeting, 7. B. Tallman’s, B. Holton’s, Moore’s Sweeting, Gilpin, Campfield, Sweet Vandervere, Red Winter Pearmain, Swaar, Black Gilliflower, In giving selections of Cider Apples I will begin with the veteran Coze’s list: American Pippin, Campfield, 7 Cooper’s Russeting, Gloucester White, Golden Reinette, Hagloe Crab, Harrison, Hewes’ Crab, House, or Gray-House, Red Streak, Roane’s White Crab, Ruckman’s Pearmain, Styre, Winesap. Aselect list of Cider Apples that may be found in many collections, all good bearers : Campfield. Gilpin. Harrison, Hewes’ Crab, Newtown Pippin, Priestley, Rawle’s Janet, ‘Waugh’s Crab Winesap. > CATALOGUE AND INDEX OF APPLES, 0 EXPLANATION. The first column presents the name of the apple, next its size, then its origin; or, if in brackets, the place where the variety is cultivated and was found. The Roman numerals indicate the Class and Order to which it is referred, and the Arabics, the Section and Sub-section, according to the classification adopted in this work. After this comes the season of maturity, Summer, Autumn, Winter, Spring, and the estimate of qual- ity, from very best, best, very good, good; good? meaning almost good; poor? meaning rather so, and last plainly poor, when considered decid- edly inferior. The names of varieties described in this volume are given in full faced type, with reference to the pages, while synonyms are printed in Ztalics. Abbreviations will explain themselves. Name. Size. Season. | Quality akon 8 Winter Sweet salen Alabama Winter....... well stereccyate Allen’s Pippin.. Allen’s Sweeting. All Summer......... | ues ee All Summer SWASHDE: ANum ........ceeceeee iilimed. Amber Crab. . small American Beauty. large American Black..... . .. smal American Black.............- med. Am. Golden Pippin.... med. Am. Golden Russet.... med. American Marygold.......... M ateie a American Pippin....... small Am, Sum, Pearmain.. med. Angle Sweet............ med. Angju-American.............. med. Annette....... .. small Apple Butter. .. Small Aromatic ... .. med. Aromatic... . large Ashland.... . large Ashmore.. : med Ashmore Striped. med. Auguset,....... W ravanive Augustine........... saan or ... large |Am T11 Coneteen tien cte ant VPN NYHNYPNYNNPNPYOPYPENE Eye PE YyPyNn === ere =| — | = ete =|] == ARSE PPPPNE Vr MVP PHY NYNNNNENE NYY falplataintalalaistatatalalalnlntalaletatala natal alatal a ye = _ Winter 'good ; Spring good L. Wint. good utumn good L.Wint. good Winter good Summ’r g5od Autumn good Autumn good Winter good rere woe Winter good Wint'r? good ‘Winter good E.Wint. bes: Spring poor ‘Summ'r best ‘Winter leood Autumn goo Summ’ Sitzood’ ‘Winter ‘good Autumn good Autumn good ‘Summ’ r good !Summ'r poor Winter |........ Winter |........ 419 1510 Autumn ........ Automn'y, good| ‘Winter ly. ‘00d| Winter v. good/636 521 476 712 CATALOGUE AND INDEX OF APPLES. Name. Size. | Orig. Class | Season. | Quality. P. August Stripe................ med. 2 II. 1.2.2. |Summ'rj|good ? August ‘Tart. - {med TI. 1.2.1. |Summ’rjgood [504 ‘Ausust Vandervere.. large |(Ind.) If. 1.2.2. |Summ’r|poor ‘Aunt Anna...... .|med. |Ohio I. 1.2.2. |Autumn|good? Aunt Hannah large |Mass.| I. 1.2.1. |Winter |gzood? Aunt’s A) large I. 1.2.2. |E.Wint.]good? Autumnal ugh -med, |Am. Di. 1.1.1. {|Autumnj|good ‘Autnmmal Paradise...........|.....-l....-- I. 1.1.1. [Autumnlgood Autumn Seek-noSurther, Synonym of Dr. Watson. Autumn Swaar, see Fall Swaar of the West Autumnal Sweet............. large I. 1.1.1. |Autumn]good Autumnal Sw. Swaar large ) 1.1.1.1. jAutumn z00d 41 Autumn Pearmain............ med. ? IV. 1.2.2. {Winter 00d Autumn Sweet. , I. J.1.1. jAutumn good Averill. ......... .| II. 0.2.2. [Spring good Baccalinus.. {TY EST t|L-Wint|gooa —|sss Bachelor is Equineteley. Bachelor's Blush.......... ...(large [N. J. I. 1.2.1. |Summ’r good Badger’s Bellflower.. large (Ohio?}/ IV. 1.2.2. |Winter j igood Baer cise sti atcawa atin cdeeuned small |Penn.| Il. 1.2.2. |Spring |“v. gd.” Bagby Russet, Synonym of Egyptian Russet. Bailey’s Golden......... large Raine IV. 1.2.1. |L.Wint.'good 665 Bailey’s Spice Il. 1.2.1. |Autumn good Bailey’s Sweet..........jlarge |N. y. UL tt i: z ‘Winter ‘good 633 Bake Apple.... 2... ccoecess I. 122 [Autumn good? Baker......... : JIE, To 222. essex, cveeese Baker's Sweet. TI. 1.1.1. 4E.Wint. good Baldwin..... adiaie'eraieiaralsp as -jlarge |Mass. {or 7 = Be ‘Winter 'gooa 421 Baldwin, N. C.............08. Narge |N. C. I. 1.2.2. /Winter ‘good Baldwin Sweet............... large |...... I. 11.2. |Winter ‘good Baltimore, Synonym of Mammoth Pippin. Baltimore, (Elliott)...... med. ! ? a iS - eS | |winter | good = 891 Baltzley Hidleatde aig | eshaisies bay > Eee eae Sees -| meteareie nie Barbour. .jmed. [Penn.| I. I 2.2. - geod Barrett med. ,Conn.| IT. 12.2. {Winter ‘good Ts... -llarge 1R. 1. I. 1.2.2. |Summ’r good Bartlet Barton. aie Basom Sw I. 1.1.1. Bassett Swe: T. 1.1.1. Bastard Geneton, Wright's Janet. Battlefield......... i sanevoims [seaisizs are South Tr. 1.1.1, Beard’s Seedling med. |Ohio | TL. II. 2. 2. Beanfin Norfolk. med. |Engl. I. 1.2.2. Beauty of Ken . large ‘Engl. Td. 1.2.2. |Autumn only gd.|584 Beauty of the West. . large ‘Ani. 1. 1.1.2. Wint. [poor Bedfordshire Foundling. -jlarge |Engl.| IV. II. 2. 1. Winter \good ? Beefsteak ............. .{med, |Mass. I. 1.2.2. [Winter |poor Beeler’s Russet.. .|med. |—Ind.)| ID. 1.2.3. |Winter |best 621 Belle et Bonne...... -jlarge |Conn.| IV. I. 2.1. |E.Wint.|good? Belden Sweet.. small |Conn?} If. 11.1.1. [Winter |good [526 Bellflower Pippin........... ./large |Ind. Tl. 1.2.1. |Autumn'good Belmont........ seein eseiee large |Va. { me it e : E. Wint.|best 529 Ben or Hustis.......... -o.-...(large |Mass.| IV. 1.2.2. |E.Wint.jgood ? Ben Davis................ large |Ky. {i - : ‘Winter |good [585 Ben Harris...... a Serotatedes aailewewne South I. 1.2.2. |Winter |........ Benonil....... ovccescoeeee- (Small |Mags. {Wy a 4 4 Summ’r|best 650 CATALOGUE AND INDEX OF APPLES. 713 Name. Size. | Orig. | Class. | Season. Quality.| P. | , : Bentley Sweet........... large Va. ? ue es Spring |good = [558 Berkely: REQ: cso «'s:esecoysieie:d:s:e:0 [rttene tee South Fe Bete Mees Suse lieca sieteveiase Berry - large evan? I. IL. E.Wint. good” 486 Bethlemite.. -med. Obio {oq [ ‘Winter |v. good/493 Betsey’s Fancy.. med. | 9 ! I. 1. ‘Winter ‘good Better tha med. Penn.) J. 1 \E.Wint. good 400 Bevan’s Favori J I 1 inane good Beverle af Red.. siell | Cajsitens aiecosaistiay Watreeete wis linia Bieceialae Big Hi Synonym Red. Rambo, Synonym of Western Beanty. Big Red Swect.. + ponte Il. 1.1.2. Bigger’ 3 Late Red............|..... South Birmingham..... med. |Penn? Black, Synonym of Jerse; ck, Black’s Annette......... med. (Ky.) 1.2.1 pore ib good Blackburn.. slarge Ky.? Mi 3 ‘Autumn! good ?° (586 Black Canada. $ lmea Can. ? 1.2.1. |E.Wint. 'good 2 Black Coal. . --llarge — ? 1.2.2. [Winter good ? Black Detroit................ large Can. ? 0.2.1. Autumn poor Black Eyes, Synonym of Cheese. Black Gilliflower...... large i 1.1.2. |Spring |poor {662 Black Jack............ -}small |Ohio 1.1. 2 inter |poor Black Lady A ‘ ../small |Eur. 1.2.1 ‘Winter |/poor Black of Michigan. med. |Can. ? L 2.1 ‘Winter |poor Blackshear. ........ all arearsiass South Tey Be | ancsesteiete petenecse js Black's Late Sweet. 5 sisrabiecetars South] .... ....... Winter |...... oi Black Tom..... med. |M I. I.2.1. |Autumn)poor Blakeley} .ciesivs.si,seews oereciess 4 large |Vt. I. 1.2.1. |Winter |good Bledsoe.................... med. |Ky. { i Lt = - \ ‘Winter |good ? 568 Blenheim Orange,............/large Eng. | TTI. 1.1.2. |Autumnjgood Blockley. ................ large |Penn. Son ae s ne \ ‘Winter |v. good/478 Blockley Pippin, Synonym of Blockley. Blondin................... large jInd. |1 yy 1 $$ {[E-Wint.|gooa 424 Blooming Orange...... large |Eng. tor 7 a Ey { Autumn|y. good|424 Bloomington........ ........ med. |Ils. IV. 1.1.2. |Winter |good Blue Bloom.................. med. Il. 12.2. |Autumn Zood ? Blue Pearmain............... large ? TIL. 1.2.2. |Autumn|good ? Bluff Sweet.............. med. |Ind. Ill. 1.1.1. [Winter lgood 548 Boalsburgh.............. large |Penn.| IV. 1.2.2. [Autumn good 675 Boas or Kelter..............--)e--eee Penn. Ti EeBide |accawcsclfescccmwa Bohanon..... cide tavafalenaess med. |Va. I. 1.2.1. |Autumniy. good|400 Bonum.................... med. I12.2 |A iv. good|424 Boravitski...............---05 med. }Russ.} D1. 0.2.2. |Summ’rjpoor Borsdorffer.............00.005 small |Germ. 1.0.2.1. [Winter |good Boston Russet, Synonym of Roxbury. Bough................ ..-..llarge |Am. { ut . i - ‘Summ'riv. good/491 Bourrassa................ large [Eur. ?|} IV. IL. 2. 3. | Winter poor 697 Bowback Sweet...............[..-05 OHIO |) ists csnsasices unin sine e|eaaeue one BOWKER i esiis onus vesvcciee cane med. |...... I. I. 2. 1. ‘Autumn ‘good Bowling Sweet...... med. !Va. Ul. 1.1.2. ‘Winter (good [559 Brabant Bellflower........... Jarge ‘Holl. ' I. 11.2.2. E. Wint.'good ? Brace’s ia aie Synonym at White Seek-no-further. Bracken................... mall .Ky. 1.1.2.1. |Summ’rjv. good/478 Bradford's Best.. wares. |eibaia-sisfissamuanalll so 22 ae = siaistoctinsis Braudywine.. sods eenioes ;med. |Del { Or. - - | Winter good? |425 Brennaman.............. large ‘Penn. III. 11.2.2. ‘Autumn. good,651 714 CATALOGUE AND INDEX OF APPLES. Name. | Size. | Orig. Class. Season. | Quadety. P. Brige’s Auburn............... med. Me. I 12.1. {Antumn'v. good Brittle Sweet............ med, ? TH. 11.1.2. |Autumn v. good/634 Broadwell............ ... large Ohio | III. 2.1.1. © [Winter :best 549 Brooke's Pippin........ large Va. Ti, I. 2.1. {Winter iv. good|637 Brown’s Superior............. large Ohio?, TIL. IL 2.2. {Winter ‘good - Bruce ‘g ? Il. 1.1.2. |Summ’r good ? Buchanan’s I. 1.2.2. |Spring ‘good? (426 Bucking TL. 11.2.2. {Autumn v. good 53 Buck Meadow Tl. 1.2.2. |/Winter good eee County. I. I. 2.1. ? good L11.2.2. |E.Wint. peor 2 \486 Aatincion’ s Eariy L11.2.1. |Summ’r . Bush. TI. 1.2.1. |Autumny. “good 568 Bush's Beauty ed. IL. I. 2.2. {Autumn poor Bullock's Pippin, Synonym of Aleut ‘Golden Russet. mal) enle oF 1.1.2. |Autumn'good [3892 Ill. J.1.2. |Winter !zood TM. 1.1.1. ‘Autumn good Iv. 1.2.1. |Autumn:good ? m2 Byers, Synonym of Equinetel Cabashea........ Canada Keinette.. Cane Creek Sweeting... .... CRIM iis) srasasninses. calalauereiein's Sait ioreisia Canon Pearmain.. Capital Capron’s Pleasant............ pase Sictonisore iwictnte iaie evel ndinve arey’s Pippin............... Carmel Sweet ofa Flaredeia tel igias. Stale . Carolina Greening........... ‘ Carolina Horse............... Carolina Pippin......... Wied Carolina Red June.... Carolina Russet.............. Carolina Striped June Caroline.. .. Caroline Watson... . Carpenter’s No. 1... large BARA BoSRe BAB Ass Bee B. — slalalaipialnletalslatalalalataletalnteteleletetetststetetetellelel= (aia mer PNY PHN NPNHYNE Hp Pr mm ppr rp wpwy POOP OOO MO MOMVF MOE rome pt 'L. Wint.|good ‘Summ’r|good { Sursimn’ r goed pent, Vv. good ‘Summ'r/good ;Winter |good Winter ig ‘Winter [poor (Winter |poor Winter |good ? ‘Winter ‘Winter |good aeuaend Eped \ ‘Winter |good Sv inter enka 581 B82 676 ‘Summ’r good CATALOGUE AND INDEX OF APPLES. Name. , Season. | Quality. Pan Oheese............. ..-./med. Cheese....... Cheeseboro.. Cheltenham... Cherokee Red. Cherry Crab... -|sinall QUE StAtC ES 5, iciscccsisia sissaicinicts: Geiciaill wsjecaease Chester...... med. Chester Red... ........228 foeeeee Chillicothe.. large Chillicothe Redstreak. - «large Christiana........... ... -../med. Chronicle.......... .../med. Churchhill Greening......... large CIA’ Seco secias satceaicicacieme ae hae Clark's Greening.............]...... Clark’s Pearmain...... med Claybank....... .....-.20-0- med Clayton........... ........ large Climb Sweet........ 0... .cceeefeeeeee Close Set, lindeleg) hiss ssaleestarese med. Cloth of Gold................ large Clouds: sssisac sesciccseceneeces ee os Cluster isjccssccee ses seek cea small Cluster Pearmain...... med. Clyde Beauty............ large eee Keswick, Synonym of Keswick. OG sccechuseaaieraisiarsiass walwispess eters» sek [wieracaie’s Coggswell................. large Suaaystedl iaeyaces gemnrede en LARC Cole’s Quince. . sesoeeeeee/Mmed. Columbia.................68 a Columbian Russet... .|small Columbus Red............. .-. (Med. Colvert....... esac seayaieyla eta large Companion................200[-eeeee Conant’s Red............ med. CONPTOSS iaie:c:e:e cis vies deep eines | oieciean Connett Sweet........... med, Conrad's Eating..............)....6+ CONWAY satis. 5 saves. Meersionss med. Cook’s Favorite... .......... med Cook’s Greening......... .... large Cook’s Red. [.. Gooper.....00.000ITn large 9" small Md. large 2. 1. 1. a= |=| Renee: Bey |r ? E. . Wint.'good ? ~e Bar ppwpw per | H = a He PNY PPNPNPPWN! wow Pret ~wr: ae ae a * REAR: Ae Slaleleiainlalelate Mae! Bebe a= ferel=|=| Setotatelais] Paine hn ele le RRA pw~p~ bt nal aol sal oad Preppy Pale) slel stelle Prpreyr~r oper large” Cooper’s Early White....... small ere] =\~lorere) eae poor Autumn poor 'E.Wint.igood ‘Autumn good ? ‘Autumn good ‘Autumn good Spring igood ? Autumn Dest Autumn.v. good Autumn'good Winter |v. good ‘Winter ‘good E. Wint. paar ‘Winter igood Winter peed utaniny rmg |goo Winter er a” Winter |good Autumn'v. goed ‘Winter |good Autumnigood ‘Autumn'good « Winter good 522 Autumn)y. good [Autumnigood ‘Winter |v. good IL. Wint.|goo Autumn|good ? Winter good Summ’r good ‘Winter good? Autumn best. ‘Summ’r good 1510 530 472 637 427 716 CATALOGUE AND INDEX OF APPI Name. | Size. | Orig. Class. | Season. | Quality.| P. Cooper's Market........ med. it {it PS bs ie | Winter ‘good 518 Cooper's Redling, Synonym of eoarer, 's Market. Cooper’s Russcting. . -. small IN. ¥Y.| IV. 1.2.3. |Winter (good Cope’s Red Sweet. smal] |jOhio | IV. L1.2. |Winter jgood Cope'’s Sweet... small |Ohio | TH. 1.1.2. |Winter lgood ? Cornell’s Fane: med. |Penn.! IV. 1.2.2. |Autumn good CORNEA sogig cnpistsgreroraie-nieiciartsosaieil loses. South I, 12.1 Winter |........ Cornfiel med. |Ohio | IV. 1.2.2. {Winter |good? |401 Cornish Aroma med. |Engl.| TI. 1.2.1. [Winter |v. good!569 ornish Gilliflower. med. jEngl IL. II. 2.2. {Winter good Corse’s Favoritescccce5 ecsceeslescawalen ova Ts. DQ. Te. |preau esas leseeests COS voce weak aseneR 3 .-ilarge [N. Y.| TID. II. 2.2. |Winter |good Court of Wyck.......... small |Engl. {ir 4 au Winter |good? 623 Court Pendu Plat............. med. |Eur. I. 1.2.1. |Winter |‘ gd.” Cracking........... ...... large |Ohio { ur _ ie ; Autumn|good |401 9 Cranberry Pippin...... large \N. Y. { 4 2 - f Winter |good? |402 Cranberry Russet...... med. ‘Ohio LILI. 2. 3. ‘Winter !good ? |491 Crawford’s Keeper.....{med. Sou. ?} IV. 1.2.1. |Winter |" gd.” 667 Creighton . {small ‘Ohio I 12.2. Summ’ r]good CH Dives evectithsuanaesanens small ‘Ohio | III. I. 2.2. |Winter |poor? Crooked Limb, gees of Watson’s Dumpling. Cropsey’s Favorite..... med. |Ills. { it. i 2 : ‘Winter |good [590 Crow's Egg.........0.--.065 . |Ind. IV. II. 1.2. |Winter [poor ? Crow's Egg... SOU) nen encee wens ead eet te eee Crownest large {Ohio | III. I. 2, Winter jgood {624 Cullasaga..... —...... med. |S. C. Ti. 11. Winter |good 559 Cullawhee............ aadisnerouese(llaieisiners South} III. II. 2. el aitieiat. aeaeere in Tale pesetatn [eenledaicin South; I. 1.2. ? Mespienitia Gs ge wanarenarenie' ... {large [Ohio | IIL. II. 2. EB. Wint. good ? 7 Guecerigua Spice...... large |N. J. | IV. 1.2. Winter |good = |668 Curtis Greening......... med. Ills. Iv. 1.2. Winter jgood = |668 Curtis Pippin................. med, |Tle. Iv. 1.2. ‘Winter |good Curtis Sweet................. large 2 IV. II. 1. Autumn|gzood Dahlonega. i ieee coessers|oeecee South] TV. 1.2.2 |esacsvestssesaves Dalton: 25 sisscsee 000 oe <] eoewe Ga. TT. 2515. |evcwresealleesazens 402 Dana.................-.0065 small; ? I, I. 2. ‘Summ’r|good _|487 Dauiel........ .. .....-... med. ? Til. I. 2. Autumn]y. good|591 Dan. Pearmain......... med. |Ind. Tit. I. 2. Winter good 591 Danvers Wint. Sweetllarge [Mass.| III. I. 1. Winter |good? {550 Darby Pippin................ larg .| IV. 12. Winter parunete ssa tsagoere aiustoustea fies’ sean Penn?| Ii. I. 2. é aoe DAVIS) siesse-cjcaersjeuaireerneitie austen ich.| IV. I. ‘Winter |good Davis’ Ortley es good Davis . see Daw: IV. 4 good Day. Il. I. 2. Winter |good? {591 Deacon TIL. II. 2. Winter |good Deal’s Red.. I. 2. Winter !good f Dean’s Sweeting TI. I. 2. Winter |good Defiance.........-..++ { a 2 ; Summ’r|good Perrmchys sega wey sae |lNisieseate ws eediatetsy dete elasure DY. Ts Qsdy- fecssccays fewsats ‘ Delight. wieors I,II.1.1. {Winter good 473 Demoerat................. i Tl. 12.1. |E.Wint.lgood [505 Demurry.......... 2.0. ee cece ee 5 see [POWEN] wicca icawiyeice Ife arsismeere|len aoasie's Derry Nonsuch............ ++ . HY IV... 2.2. (L.Wint. good Detroit Black.......... large |Can. ?{ II. II.2.1. |Autumnigood? |582 Detroit Red............. +. [large |Can. ?} II. 1.2.1. |Autumn|good ? Devonshire Quarrenden...... small 'Engl. I, 1.2.2, 'Autumn good ? CATALOGUE AND INDEX OF APPLES. vewi | Season. Quality. P. iVume. | Size. | Orig. | DOWD sa tee cds. wpenn onesies Imed. Dewit{, Synonym of Doctor Dewitt. Dick’s Seedling............-.|...... Dillaways ........ Dillingham.............. 3H Disharoon,...............0065 Doctor Dewitt....... asicciaquisade large Doct. Fulcher............ A Doct. Watson............ Dodge's Crim :on, Synonym of Ashinore ? Dodge's Early....... 0.2... ‘med. Dole’s Red... 6... eee ‘med. BRomime................ large Downing’s Paragor large Downton Pippin Diogo insane Duchess of Oldenburg large Duckett........... large Duffield Pipp llarge Duling Sweet. Dumcelow...........--.-s. 0.5: large ‘lEnel. Durable Keeper...... Durham Winter Pearma jarge large Early Joe....... oi .. med. N.Y. Early Longstem.. small ; Early Nonauch.. -. small Early Pe ince: a Early Greening... an med. Penn. Early Red Margaret.......... ‘med. Engl. Synonym of perc Redstreal Earl Redstreak, ynonym of Red large med. 13 HN WHS Late coca ciscwsaciana|sacoes Emersine Swe Emperor, see Ale wp ‘small BER S.8s Rize: ABest Ae ee Paes _ IE. Wint.'good ? f LE. Wint.|good LE, Wint.|z00d. Winter Bood E. Wint.|v. good|4s Summ’'r.good Winter lgood ? Winter ly. good ‘Winter good Autumn \good ; Autumn v. good Summ’'r good Autumn ‘good Popp: premem~p~p ppp jarge Summ’r good Zane HY SRRRR: = l= eleleleliclel a ate aleta ll ero Se re PPPYYPNPPYNE Yep: BENE PPVPPVPYNNY NVYVpwh; pPNMNYNYpD!: PNMYYPPRpD! Pens lal nlalalaielalalatatat al wn _ Summ’r,good... Summ’r best a learn babs Summ’r good ? Summ’'r good asa Tr good ? 1 =" Summ’ T good Summ’r|........ Summ'riv. good Summ’r]..... Spring good? inter 'good [E.Wint. poor ? Summ’r good ? Winter good f Winter |v. good ‘Winter ie good 5 Winter good ? 1638 514 523 718 CATALOGUE AND INDEX OF APPLES. Fall Winesap Farley Red. Farrer’s Summer. Father Abraham.............- Favorite... -|small { Til. +A AWBSRRn RAPER 45 Autumn|good ? Autumniy. good) Name. Size. Orig. Class. | Season. Quality. EMO PCTO Piss iaisioniiasiedisrect Heard suse lar; ML. L II. 2.2. Winter good Emperor. (Dickson’s)......... eae ge ou i AN OR. acpsisyene aut aoe Winter Sweet... med. Ky Be dade Be ,Winter good mule PATNT Ss “Tid, “hasaesseae- sieves a Enfield Pearmain.. > , WI L112 Winter good English Codling... - large Engl. i TY. 1.2.1. ‘Autumn good English Golden. PIPPUMsis ces cance Engl. ' WI 12.1 Winter good Enel. Golden Russet... med. Engl? Ill. 1.2.3. ‘Winter v. good English Pearmain............ large Pf I. 1.2.2. “Autumn good English Redstreak. . large (Ind. eae a See Winter v. good Eaglish Redstreak.. large Engl.: IIT. 1.2.2. ‘Winter good? English Red Sweeting w/anetets Engl. | DWE Th 2e: tasics sae site: eva English Husset.. -med. Engl? IIL. 1.2.3. ‘Winter poor English Sweeting............ ..... Bygi? YE EAB. lccswsane nciaians oy Ense Sweeting, Synonym of Danvers. MODSY: F Slalaie Winter good Winter good Winter good : | Winter. good ? E.Wint. good? Winter good Winter v. good Winter good Winter ‘good Autumn good E.Wint. good Winter poor ? Autnmn good Summ’r ........ Winter good Summ’r good ot =, : i Summ’r good ay rt Winter good? Winter v. zone. ‘Autumn gor Winter good? Winter good ; ¢ Summ’r good * ¢ Spring loo Autumn good Suamm’r poor ‘Winter i........ » ; Autumn'good ‘Winter 'poor ? E.Wint.'good ¢ j Summ’r'good ; ‘Winter |good Autumn/best Autumn'good ‘Winter Sraiataceisls ‘Winter \poor Winter |poor L.Wint.|good CATALOGUE AND INDEX OF APPLES, 735 Name. Size. | Orig. Class. Season. | Quality. Twitchell Sweet............ -..fmed. |N. H.) IL 111.2. /E.Wint.|good Union....... a 2 i I. 1.2.2. |Summ’r/poor Uri Manly. -)} Tl. 1.2.1. {Winter |v. good Van Buren : Ill. J.2.1. |Winter |good? Vance’s Harvest e I. 1.2.2. |Summ’'riy. : good Vandervere, Synonym of N ewiown Spitzenberg. Vandervere—August.. ....... large |(Ind.) I. I. 2.2. |Summ’r|poor Vandervere—Fail........ eRe med. |(O.) IH. 1.2.2. |Autumn|good Vandervere—Penneylvania..../med. |Del. I. 1.2.2. |Winter good Vandervere Pippin....jlarge |Penn. I. 1.2.2. {Winter good Vandlyne ....... 0... cece eee large 2 DI. 1.2.1. |Autumn good Vaughn’s Winter...... |med. |Ky. - ns : Winter |good Veineal Russet............... small (fls.)| Ol. 1.2.3. {Autumijpoor Vestal, Synonym of Maiden’s Blush. Victualsand Drink.... Jarze N. J. If. 1.1.1. |Autumn|good Vincent Sweet...... .... --(med. 40.) TH. 1.1.1. |Autumnjpoor Virginia Greening large |Va. I. 1.2.1. [L.Wint.|/poor Virginia June.......... med. |Va.? Il. 1.1.1. |Autumn|good Virginia June.. med. tnd) Til. 1.2.2. |Summ’r|........ Virginia May................. small |Va. I. 1.2.1. |E. Sum. good Virginia Quaker........ small |Va. III. 1.2.1. |Summ’r}good? Voss’? Wimter............ large \(Va.) | III. 1.2.1. |Winter |good Waddell Hall........ .......-]...05 outh| EV. F8.2. ewes ces [sacecees Wagoner.................. large |N. Y. I. Il. 2.2. /Winter |good Walker's Greening............|...... South I. 1.21. /Winter |........ Walker’s Pippin..............|...... South} III. I.2.1. |Winter |..... Walker's Yellow............ large |Ga. Tl. 1.2.1. [Winter good Wall, Synonym of Berry. Wallace's Green Pippin......)...... Beye |e sissresceersanie |Winter Agape on Walpole... ;