ALBERT R. MANN LIBRARY:- AT | CORNELL UNIVERSITY 3 1924 073 912 598 Cornell University Library The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924073912598 Production Note Cornell University Library produced this volume to replace the irreparably deteriorated original. It was scanned using Xerox software and equipment at 600 dots per inch resolution and compressed prior to storage using ITU Group 4 compression. The digital data were used to create Cornell's replacement volume on paper that meets the ANSI Standard Z39.48-1992. The production of this volume was supported by the National Endowment for the Humanities. Digital file copyright by Cornell University Library 1995. Scanned as part of the A. R. Mann Library project to preserve and enhance access to the Core Historical Literature of the Agricultural Sciences. Titles included in this collection are listed in the volumes published by the Cornell University Press in the series THE LITERATURE OF THE AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 1991-1996, Wallace C. Olsen, series editor. ALBERT R. MANN LIBRARY NEW YorK STATE COLLEGES OF AGRICULTURE AND HOME ECONOMICS AT CORNELL UNIVERSITY SMELL, TASTE, AND ALLIED SENSES IN THE VERTEBRATES MONOGRAPHS ON EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY PUBLISHED FORCED MOVEMENTS, TROPISMS, AND ANIMAL CONDUCT By JACQUES LOEB, Rockefeller Institute THE ELEMENTARY NERVOUS SYSTEM By G. H. PARKER, Harvard University THE PHYSICAL BASIS OF HEREDITY By T. H. MORGAN, Columbia University INBREEDING AND OUTBREEDING: THEIR GENETIC AND SOCIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE By E. M. EAST and D. F. JONES, Bussey Institution, Harvard University THE NATURE OF ANIMAL LIGHT By E. N. HARVEY, Princeton University SMELL, TASTE AND ALLIED SENSES IN THE VERTEBRATES By G. H. PARKER, Harvard University BIOLOGY OF DEATH By R. PEARL, Johns Hopkins University IN PREPARATION PURE LINE INHERITANCE By H.S. JENNINGS, Johns Hopkins University LOCALIZATION OF Pee ae els SUBSTANCES By E. G. CONKLIN, Princeton University TISSUE CULTURE By R. G. HARRISON, Yale University INJURY, RECOVERY AND DEATH IN RELATION TO CONDUCTIVITY AND PERMEABILITY By W. J. V. OSTERHOUT, Harvard University THE EQUILIBRIUM BETWEEN ACIDS AND BASES IN ORGANISM AND ENVIRONMENT By L. J. HENDERSON, Harvard University CHEMICAL BASIS OF GROWTH By T. B. ROBERTSON, University of Toronto COORDINATION IN LOCOMOTION By A. R. MOORE, Rutgers College OTHERS WILL FOLLOW MONOGRAPHS ON EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY SMELL, TASTE, AND ALLIED SENSES IN THE VERTEBRATES BY G. H. PARKER, Sc.D. PROFESSOR OF ZOOLOGY, HARVARD UNIVERSITY 87 ILLUSTRATIONS PHILADELPHIA AND LONDON J. B. LIPPINCOTT COMPANY COPYRIGHT, 1922, BY J. B. LIPPINCOTT COMPANY Electrotyped and Printed by J. B. Lippincott Company The Washington Square Press, Philadelphia, U. S. A. EDITORS’ ANNOUNCEMENT THE rapid increase of specialization makes it im- possible for one author to cover satisfactorily the whole field of modern Biology. This situation, which exists in all the sciences, has induced English authors to issue series of monographs in Biochemistry, Physiology, and Physics. A number of American biologists have decided to provide the same opportunity for the study of Experimental Biology. Biology, which not long ago was purely descriptive and speculative, has begun to adopt the methods of the exact sciences, recognizing that for permanent progress not only experiments are required but quantitative experi- ments. It will be the purpose of this series of monographs to emphasize and further as much as possible this develop- ment of Biology. Experimental Biology and General Physiology are one and the same science, in method as well as content, since both aim at explaining life from the physico-chemical constitution of living matter. The series of monographs on Experimental Biology will therefore include the field of traditional General Physiology. Jacquss Lorn, T. H. Morgan, W. J. V. OsTerHovrt. 5 AUTHOR’S PREFACE SEnsE organs have always excited general interest, for they are the means of approach to the human mind. Without them our intellectual life would be a blank. The deaf and the blind show how serious is the loss of even a single set of these organs. Although the ear and the eye have commonly received most attention, the other sense organs, such as those of smell and of taste, are in reality equally worthy of con- sideration. These organs are of first significance in warning us of untoward conditions that may exist about us particularly in relation to our food. But they not only serve us in this protective way, they are also of the utmost importance in initiating that chain of events which cul- minates in successful nutrition. Through their action the secretion of the digestive juices and other like operations, so essential to the proper treatment of the food, are started and furthered in the alimentary canal. Thus their activities, though less associated with our mental states than are those of the ear and of the eye, are never- theless so essential to our organic well-being that they are in reality quite as necessary to us as the so-called higher senses. Smell and taste, together with certain other senses not so well known, form a more or less natural group in which there is a certain amount of functional interrelation and genetic connection, and it is from this standpoint that these senses will be considered in the following pages. They will thus illustrate in a way principles common to 7 8 AUTHOR’S PREFACE other groups of sense organs, and these principles will be found to be of an essentially dynamic character as con- trasted with the older conceptions in which function has been brought into relation less intimately with structure. The author is greatly indebted to the editors of this series of monographs for many suggestions that have led to improvements in the text. He is also under obligations to his wife for a careful revision of the manuscript. He wishes to extend his thanks to numerous persons who have permitted him to copy and use figures contained in their publications. In all such instances the sources of such figures are acknowledged in the text. Where a figure is given without reference, it is an original. The drawings for all figures were made by Mr. E. N. Fisher. GH. BP, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. January, 1922. CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I. Nature or SENSE ORGANS ........ 000 cece eee eee eee eens 13 II. ANatomy oF THE OLFACTORY ORGAN..........02 0.00 cee eee 23 III. PxystotoGy OF OLFACTION......... 000000000 cece eee eee 42 IV. VoMERO-NASAL ORGAN OR ORGAN OF JACOBSON.............-. 92 V. Tae Common CHEMICAL SENSE............00..0 00sec ee eees 102 VI. ANaAToMY OF THE GUSTATORY ORGAN.........-...0000000005 110 VII. PHysloLoGy OF GUSTATION........00 00. c cece eee fees 132 VIII. InTEeRRELATION OF THE CHEMICAL SENSES.................5: 167 TINDEEX sisal vatacase sca tndaane eae Ae b ck atasia do tiles a Seovenel aes brateean ats avotoaate 187 ILLUSTRATIONS FIG. PAGE 1. Diagram of the Lateral Wall of the Right Nasal Cavity of Man.. 24 2. Diagram of a Transverse Section of the Right Nasal Cavity of Man 25 3. Respiratory Epithelium from the Nasal Cavity of a Young Pig.... 27 4, Olfactory Cleft of Man......... 0... cece eee eee nen e eee 28 5. Olfactory Epithelium from a Pig Embryo.............-...-00.005 29 6. Olfactory Epithelium from a Young Mouse.................+++5. 30 7. Isolated Olfactory Cells and Sustentacular Cells from Man...... 31 8. Isolated Olfactory Cell and Sustentacular Cell from a Frog....... 32 9. Olfactory Cell of a Pike Showing Flagellum..................... 33 10. Olfactory Epithelium from a Chick Embryo................-+505 36 11. Ventral View of the Head of a Shark (Scyllium) ................ 38 12. Diagram of the Right Nasal Cavity of Man Showing the Direction of the Inspired Air Currents. ............. cece eee eee eens 46 13. Simple Rubber Olfactometer............ 00.00 ccc eee cece eee eee 50 14. Double Olfactometer ........0.0.. 0. cc cece cece cent eee eee eees 51 15. Ventral View of the Head of a Hammer-head Shark................ 66 16. Curves of Olfactory Exhaustion. ..............-eecceeeeeee renee 71 V2 Olfactory: Prism 20.52 dois ad's ace aes wae dae CER Sree 75 18. Generalized Diagrams of the Molecular Structure of Classes of Aromatic Bodies (Olfactory Stimuli)...................--00. 80 19. Head of Human Embryo showing Vomero-nasal Pore.............. 93 20. Diagram of the Median Face of the Left Nasal Cavity of Man...... 94 21. Transverse Section of the Snout of a Young Frog................ 95 22. Transverse Section of the Head of a Snake Embryo............... 96 23. Transverse Section of the Nasal Septum of a Young Cat........... 97 24. Epithelium from the Vomero-nasal Organ of the Sheep............. 98 12 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. 37. ILLUSTRATIONS Dorsal View of the Human Tongue..............-..-0000 000+ 112 Vertical Section of a Fungiform Papilla..................-..-0055 113 Vertical Section of a Vallate Papilla..................2.-0020 055 114 Lateral View of a Catfish Showing Gustatory Branches of the Facial N@ryeiicc caine occ cers eon MRR Es eae es sais eae MY 116 A. Simple “Laste-buds oiivntcceaaacins ieee atagae Die eek NS eee es 117 A Compound Taste-bud.......... 0.00 eee ee 118 Taste-buds of the Rabbit.............. 0.0... c cee eee 121 Taste-buds'of the Gatscecscausi add wae doe kama keeee aed a setae Y 122 Taste buds of the European Barbel..................02.00.00000 124 Diagram of the Human Tongue Showing Innervation.............. 125 Diagram of the Possible Paths of the Gustatory Nerves in Man.... 126 Diagrams of the Human Tongue Showing the Distribution of the FOU Tastes ines. ca cece ca seein wabad aqunecken anced aaa dy ea 149 Diagrams of the Receptor Systems of the Vertebrate Chemoreceptors 181 SMELL, TASTE, AND ALLIED SENSES IN THE VERTEBRATES CHAPTER I. NATURE OF SENSE ORGANS. Contents.—1. Older Conception of Sense Organs. 2. Modified View due to Theory of Reflex Action. 3. The Genesis of Receptors. 4. Bibliography. 1. OutpeR Conception of Sense Organs. In the con- ventional text-book, sense organs are commonly looked upon as structures that supply the brain with those nerv- ous impressions from which the mental life of the indi- vidual is built. During normal activity these organs are incessantly in operation and flood the central apparatus with a stream of impulses by which are carried to us evi- dences of the multitudinous alterations of the environ- ment. Through the ear and the eye pass continuous streams of change by which we adjust ourselves not only to the immediate material world about us but to the world of ideas whose elements are spoken and writ- ten words. Sense organs from a structural standpoint are organs whose cells are so specialized that they are subject to stim- ulation by only a particular category of external changes. As Keith Lucas has expressed it, sense cells approximate ~ aunifunctional state. The changes by which they are brought into action form rather homogeneous groups of 13 14 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES environmental alterations. Thus the chemical changes of the surroundings affect the organs of smell and of taste, the pressure changes those of touch and hearing, and al- terations in the radiant energy those of sight. These natural groups of environmental changes have been des- ignated as homologous, or, better, adequate stimuli for the sense organ that they activate. Such organs are ordi- narily arranged under five heads each with an adequate stimulus and productive of a special sensation; they are the organs of smell, taste, touch, hearing, and sight. Experience has also shown that when in a given per- son a sense organ exhibits complete congenital incapacity, such an individual lacks certain mental elements that can never in reality be made good to him by the activity of the remaining parts. A state of this kind implies a certain mental deficiency in the given individual. If a person has been blind from birth, no amount of description can supply to him the sensations of the wealth of color that the external world holds for the normal man. Where blind- ness is an acquired defect, the rememberance of the former color sensations as compared with the present deprivation, makes the state of deficiency still more pro- nounced. And in those rare cases where there is a unilateral defect in color vision with sight otherwise unim- paired, the subject can contrast most vividly the state of deficiency with that of normal completeness. Such con- ditions, which are known to occur not only in sight but in the other senses as well, have had a most profound influ- ence on the interpretations that naturalists have placed upon the states presented by the lower animals. It has been commonly assumed, and with no small show of reason, that where an animal is found to possess NATURE OF SENSE ORGANS 15 an eye or an ear, for instance, it should be accredited with all the central nervous activities, sensations and the like, that accompany such an organ in man, qualified only by the degree of development to which the particular organ in the given animal has arrived. Conclusions based upon such a course of reasoning were commonly ad- mitted as valid by the workers of a few decades ago (Lubbock, 1882; Graber, 1884) and the text-books of that period in dealing with the sense organs of the lower animals discuss these parts ordinarily under the conven- tional five heads of the older human physiology (Jourdan, 1889). From this standpoint one of the lower animals is like a defective human being in that its full sensory ac- tivity falls short of that of the normal man. Or it may be compared to a person whose sensory development is un- symmetrical and whose relations with the surroundings have come to be predominant through a limited number of sensory channels rather than through all. It is likewise perfectly clear that a given animal, whose organization in general may be simpler than that of man, may nevertheless excede him in a particular sensory capacity and in this respect at least stand above him. It is commonly admitted that the dog far outruns man in the keeness of his sense of smell and it has long been known that cats hear tones of a pitch much toohigh for the human ear. These and other like examples show that though the senses of the lower animals are in general less efficient than those of man, the reverse is occasionally true. Moreover among some of the lower forms, sense or- gans have been discovered that are not represented in man. Thus fishes possess, in addition to the five classes of human sense organs, the so-called lateral-line organs. 16 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES Here then must be a wholly novel set of sensory relations. As to the sensations arising from these organs man can form no direct conception, for they are entirely outside the range of his experience. Hence Leydig, the discoverer of the sensory nature of these parts, wrote of them as organs of a sixth sense. Thus to the older workers the senses of the lower animals were like those of a human being that had suffered either curtailment or expansion even to the extent of excluding or including whole categories of stimuli. But quite aside from the question of the number and variety of these parts, is the opinion held by most of the early workers that the sense organs of the lower ani- mals are primarily concerned with providing the brain or corresponding structure of the given creature with that body of sensation which was supposed to represent all the significant changes in the effective environment. 2. Modified View due to Theory of Reflex Action. The belief that sense organs were chiefly coricerned with providing the brain with the elements of which the mental life is composed suffered an important limitation from the work of the physiologist. This limitation arose from the development of the idea of reflex action. Originating about the time of Descartes in the seventeenth century, the conception of the reflex action grew in time into a most important principle for the interpretation of nervous operations. It was at first applied to that form of nervous activity whose outcome is fairly constant and in a way mechanical in that it is unassociated with conscious- ness, but it was gradually extended to include those per- formances in which consciousness is involved and at -asent it commonly refers to any chain of nervous ‘ivity in which a sensory stimulation produces an im- NATURE OF SENSE ORGANS 17 pulse that, after passage through the central nervous organs, results in action. From the beginning many reflexes were believed to be unassociated with consciousness and though this view was subsequently combated and the idea of the reflex extended to nervous operations that included an obvious sensa- tional element, it nevertheless remained true that a host of reflex operations could be pointed out that were with- out representation in consciousness. Thus the impulses that flow from the vestibular portion of the human ear and that are of the utmost importance in maintaining equilibrium provoke no obvious sensations and the vast flux of afferent nerve action that moves from the mus- cle to the spinal cord and that is so essential to the coordination of bodily movements, runs its course without exciting sensation. These and many like instances have made it clear that the reflex, even in the most special ap- plication of the term may as often be unassociated with sensation as associated with it. As the first step in every reflex is the excitation of a sense organ and as many reflexes are unassociated with consciousness, it must be admitted that sense organs, not- withstanding the name, are not always necessarily con- cerned with sensations. Many certainly have nothing whatever to do with such central nervous states. Thus itis doubtful if the normal activity of the sensory endings in our muscles and tendons is ever productive of sensation. In consequence of this condition a reasonable objection was raised to the term sense organ and it was proposed by Bethe (1897) to use in place of it the word receptor. Although the theoretic force of this objection has not always carried conviction, the term receptor has come into 2 18 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES common use and the emphasis that it places on the organs to which it is applied as receivers of environmental change rather than as originators of impulses to sensation is certainly a step in the right direction. Human receptors belong to one or other of two classes. Hither they are concerned purely and simply with the excitation of reflex acts and take no part in the pro- duction of sensations, in which case they may be called activators, or they are at the same time effective in arousing sensations, the elements of the intellectual life and hence may be appropriately termed sense organs. All receptors belong to either one or the other of these classes though in some instances a certain degree of temporary vacillation occurs. Hence it may be that these classes exemplify in a way two receptive functions, one of which predominates in one class and the other in the other. How these functions are related can best be gathered from the genetic history of receptors. 3. The Genesis of Receptors. Receptors such as the eye and the ear, the organs of smell and taste, and the more diffuse sensory equipment of the skin, are found in all the more complex animals. They abound in the verte- brates, the mollusks, the arthropods, and to a less extent in the worms. They may be said to occur even in the ce- lenterates, as, for instance, among the jelly fishes, though in the majority of these animals the receptors present a diffuse condition more like that seen in the vertebrate skin than in the vertebrate eye or ear. This diffuse state seems to be characteristic of the receptors in the simpler sessile invertebrates. The more complex animals such as are capable of active locomotion exhibit almost invari- ably specialized types of organs. NATURE OF SENSE ORGANS 19 So far as the neuromuscular system of the inverte- brates is concerned, forms as lowin the scale as the annelid worms appear to possess all the elements of the corre- sponding system in the vertebrates. Such worms may have specialized receptors, eyes and the like, often of a highly complex structure. They possess a well-differ- entiated central nervous system as represented in their so-called brain and ventral ganglionic chain. Finally, they have an abundant variety of specialized effectors in their various muscles, glands, and luminous organs. Their receptors, central nervous organs, and muscles are so related that reflexes can be demonstrated on them as readily as on vertebrate preparations. In other words, they possess in completeness, though in simple form, a working neuromuscular mechanism essentially like that of the higher animals. When, however, an examination of such forms as the celenterates is made, it is found that the coral animals, the sea-anemones, the hydroids, and the like, possess scarcely any trace of a central nervous apparatus. In these animals fairly well specialized sensory surfaces occur, whose nervous prolongations connect either imme- diately with the subjacent musculature or give rise to a nerve-net which in turn connects with the contractile ele- ments. Thus the receptor is applied to the muscle very directly and without the intervention of a central organ. Such an arrangement allows of simple reflexes, for, when the receptive surface is stimulated, the animal responds at once by an appropriate muscular movement. Thus if meat juice is discharged on the tentacles of a sea-anemone, these organs carry out vermiculate movements and the gullet opens;or if the pedal edge of the column is touched, 20 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES the whole animal contracts. The fact that meat juice will not excite the pedal edge of the column and that a touch applied to the tentacles is seldom followed by more than a slight local activity shows that the external surface of the sea-anemone, though generally receptive, is locally specialized. As amatter of fact this surface in degree of differentiation stands between a diffuse receptive surface, such as the vertebrate skin, and a specialized organ like the eye or the ear. In the literal sense of the word the outer surface of a sea-anemone is not sensory though abundantly receptive. There is no reason to suppose that the receptive areas of these animals are concerned with initiating impulses to sensation. They connect very directly with muscles and serve quite obviously as trigger-like organs by which the muscle is set in action. A careful examination of the activities of sea-anemones has failed to reveal any evi- dence, such as can be produced from the more complex animals, to show that these simple creatures possess central nervous functions. Such functions apparently have no part in their organized performances. Hence their receptors have nothing whatever to do with initia- ting impulses to sensation, but are limited in their action to the excitation of the muscles after the type of the most mechanical reflex. The presence in celentrates of eye spots, olfactory pits, statocysts and other such special receptors is, therefore, no indication that these animals are endowed with corresponding sensations, as many of the older workers believed, but this condition merely shows that their possessors are especially open to a particular stimulus. An eye spot does not mean that the animal pos- sesses sight, but that it is readily excited to action by light. NATURE OF SENSE ORGANS 21 Thus of the two functions that have been attributed to receptors, the capacity to excite action and the ability to initiate impulses for sensation, the former is much the more widely distributed of the two and is without question the more primitive. Since sponges are known to possess muscles but are devoid of nervous tissue, it is probable that they represent a type of organization which in point of time preceded that in which the nervous elements arose. So far as can be judged these elements originated in connection with the previously differentiated muscle and as a special means of exciting it to contraction. This earliest nervous mate- rial must have been, therefore, essentially receptive in character and must have served as the source of the more obvious receptors of specialized types. Thus receptors must be regarded as the original form of nervous struc- ture, concerned in the beginning with the simple excita- tion of muscle (activators) and subsequently involved, after the development of the central organs, with that supply of impulses which yields the elements of the intel- lectual life (sense organs). The extent to which a natural group of receptors may undergo differentiation and yet maintain a striking degree of mutual interdependence can nowhere be better illus- trated than with the chemical receptors, the organs of smell and of taste. It is from this standpoint that the structure and function of these receptors will be con- sidered in the following chapters. 4, BIBLIOGRAPHY. Beer, T., A. BerHE, und J. von UExKULL. 1899. Vorschliige zu einer objektivierenden Nomenklatur in der Physiologie des Nervensystems. Biol. Centralbl., Bd. 19, pp. 517-521. 22 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES BetHe, A. 1897. Das Nervensystem von Carcinus mznas. Arch. mik. Anat., Bd. 50, pp. 460-546. GraBer. V. 1884. Grundlinien zur Erforschung des Helligkeits- und Farbensinnes der Tiere. Prag & Leipzig, 322 pp. Jourpan, E. 1889. Les sens chez les animaux inférieurs. Paris, 314 pp. Lussock, J. 1882. Ants, Bees, and Wasps. New York, 448 pp. Parker, G. H. 1910. The Reactions of Sponges, with a Consideration of the Origin of the Nervous System. Jour. Exp. Zodél., vol., 8, pp. 1-41, Parker, G. R. 1917, The Sources of Nervous Activity. Science, vol. 45, pp. 619-626. Parker, G. H. 1919. The Elementary Nervous System. Philadelphia, 229 pp. CHAPTER II. ANATOMY OF THE OLFACTORY ORGAN. Contents.—1. Nasal Cavities in Man. 2. Nasal Mem- branes. 3. Olfactory Epithelium. 4. Intermediate Zone. 5. Polymorphic Cells. 6. Sense Buds. 7. Free-nerve Endings. 8. Development of Olfactory Nerve. 9. Com- parative Anatomy of Olfactory Organs. 10. Bibliography. 1. Nasat Cavities in Man. In man the olfactory organs are paired and are situated one in each nasal cavity. Each of these cavities possesses an external opening, the anterior naris, and an internal one, the posterior naris or choana, which communicates with the pharynx. (Fig.1). The two nasal cavities are separated by the nasal septum, a partly bony, partly cartilaginous wall, which forms a smooth median partition between them. The lateral walls of these cavities are thrown into a series of more or less horizontal folds, the nasal conche. These are commonly three in number for each cavity though in some instances only two are present and in others a fourth, fifth or even a sixth can be discerned. Of the three conche usually present the most ventral one, the inferior concha, is the largest and extends through much of the length of the cavity in a direction approxi- mately parallel to its floor. Immediately above the inferior concha is the somewhat smaller middle concha which is followed by the still smaller superior concha. When only two conche are present, they are the inferior and the 23 24 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES middle, the superior being absent. When a fourth concha is to be seen, it is found above and behind the superior. It has been designated the first supreme concha and it Yj Yj Fic. 1.—Diagram of the lateral wall of the right nasal cavity of man. 1, Inferior concha; 2, middle concha; 3, superior concha; 4, first supreme concha; 5, second supreme concha; the apertures numbered 6 to 10 are covered from sight by the concha, but their positions are indicated by vertical lining; 6, aperture of the nasolacrimal duct opening into the inferior meatus; 7, opening of the maxillary sinus (middle meatus); 8, opening of the frontal sinus (middle meatus); 9, and 10, openings of the ethmoid cells, 9, into the middle meatus, 10, into the superior meatus; 11, opening of the Eustachian tube; 12, vesibule; 13, atrium; 14, choana; 15, fronta! sinus; 16, sphenoidal sinus whose opening is indicated by an arrow; 17, olfactory region whose limits are marked by the dotted line. The vertical dotted line shows the plane of section from which Fig. 2 was drawn. may be followed by a second or even a third supreme concha. According to Schaeffer (1920), the first supreme concha is to be observed in about 60 per cent of all adult human beings. The three conche ordinarily present project from ANATOMY OF THE OLFACTORY ORGAN 25 the lateral wall of each nasal chamber into its cavity and partly divide that cavity into three approximately hori- zontal passages: the inferior meatus under the inferior concha, the middle meatus under the middle concha and the superior meatus under the superior concha. (Fig. 2). The external naris leads at once to the first chamber of the nose, the vestibule, which connects almost directly with the inferior meatus, less directly with the su- perior meatus and through the so-called atrium with the middle meatus. Between the median sep- tum of the nose and the laterally situated conche is a considerable space known as the common meatus. Dorsally this space is continuous with a narrow slit lying between the superior concha ee ee ee es and the septum and called the vere section of the right nasal olfactory cleft. All these pas- jaucated By’ the verucal asted sages and spaces communicate charge soncns: 3 superior con more or less directly and freely superios ‘neatuss “8.” tommon fc 7 meatus; 9, olfactory cleft (left through the posterior naris or side); 10, ethmoid cells; “11, choana with the pharynx. In the bones about the nose in man are large paired air- spaces or sinuses that communicate with the exterior through the nasal cavity. These spaces, which have been very fully described by Schaeffer (1916), are of consid- erable size and are lined with a mucous epithelium con- tinuous with that of the nose. They are somewhat variable in number and connections and yet they fall more or less 26 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES naturally into four sets, the maxillary, frontal, and sphe- noidal sinuses and the ethmoidal cells. Each maxillary sinus is a large space in the maxillary bone above the teeth. It opens by a considerable slit into the anterior part of the middle meatus. (Figs. 1 and 2). The frontal sinus,in the frontal bone also opens into the middle meatus at a point above and anterior to the opening of the maxillary sinus. Each sphenoidal sinus opens into the posterior end of the appropriate olfactory cleft in a region known as the spheno-ethmoidal recess. The remaining accessory nasal spaces, the ethmoid cells, are more or less variable; some of them open into the middle meatus by several apertures well above the slit for the maxillary sinus. Others open, more commonly by a single aperture, into the superior meatus. In addition to these various openings, the naso- lacrimal duct, by which the lacrimal secretions from the eye are carried to the nasal cavity, opens between a pair of lips on the lateral wall of the inferior meatus near its anterior extremity, 2. Nasal Membranes. The nasal vestibule is lined with a delicate continuation of the outer skin. The walls of the deeper part of the nasal cavity are covered with a mucous membrane which is divisible into two regions, the restricted olfactory region in the dorsal part of the cavity and the much more extended respiratory region embrac- ing the remainder of the cavity. The mucous membrane of the respiratory region is reddish in color and consists of a pseudo-stratified epi- thelium containing ciliated cells and basal cells backed up by a well developed tunica propria. (Fig. 3.) The cilia of this region lash towards the choana. The secretion covering the surface of the epithelium comes from numer- ANATOMY OF THE OLFACTORY ORGAN Q7 ous branched alveolo-tubular glands which contain both mucous and serous cells. The conche of the respiratory region have long been known to be extremely vascular and to be possessed of a structure like that of erectile tissue. This is especially true of their edges. They can be excited through reflex channels to considerable enlargement and the swelling thus produced may be suffi- cient to close completely the respir- atory passages. It is believed that this high vascularity of the respira- tory region is concerned with the moistening and warming of the current of respiratory air. The secretions of this portion of the nose — theiealirean eee eR are also believed to be inimical to ¢ dusted Bi’ Ritoe tlevck: pathogenic germs and thus to afford ety are a protection to the deeper parts against the invasion of disease. The olfactory region in man is yellowish in color as it is in the calf and in the sheep. In the dog and the rabbit it is of a more brownish hue. According to the older anatomists it was supposed to extend in man over the dorsal half or even more of the nasal cavity. Von Brunn (1892), however, claimed by a reconstruction from sections that the olfactory epithelium was much more restricted than had been originally supposed. According to this author only a small portion of the superior concha and a correspondingly small part of the nasal septum represent the unilateral area of distribution of the olfactory nerve. This area in one subject measured 257 sq. mm. and in an- 28 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES other 238 sq. mm. The more recent results of Read (1908), however, show that in man the olfactory fibers spread from the dorsal portion of the olfactory cleft ven- trally over the superior concha almost to its free edge and correspondingly over the septum to about one third its ex- tent. (Fig. 4). The antero-posterior spread of the nerve, according to this author, is about twice that of its ventral distribution on either the concha or the septum; hence the whole area innervated by each olfactory nerve, if spread out flat, would be approximately square in outline and not far from 25 mm. Fro. 4.—Olfactory cleft tO a side, somewhat over twice the fhe agesi septum () une ~eXtent ascribed to it by von Brunn. ward; the blackened area shows the distribution of 3. Olfactory Epithelium. The olfac- the olfactory nerve. After i g : Read, 1908, Plate 11, tory epithelium has been an object of interest to histologists for a long time. As early as 1855 Kekhard stated that in the frog it was composed of two classes of elements, long epithelial cells and nucleated fibers. Which of these served as the endings of the olfactory nerve he was unable to say. In the same year Ecker discovered on the deep face of the olfactory epithelium a third class of cells subsequently called by Krause (1876) basal cells. (Fig. 5.) These three classes of elements were identified in a number of vertebrates and described by Schultze (1856, 1862) who expressed the belief that the nucleated fibers were sense cells and represented the true endings of the olfactory nerve though he was unable to demonstrate a connection between these cells and the nerve. It is probable that the connection of the so-called NATURE OF SENSE ORGANS 29 olfactory cell with the olfactory nerve-fiber was first seen by Babuchin in 1872 who showed that in a gold-chloride preparation, fibers could be traced from the nerve to the cells that were suspected by Schultze to be sense cells. In 1886 this connection was demonstrated with much greater certainty in methylen-blue preparations by Ehrlich whose results were con- firmed the following year by Arnstein. Because of the transitoriness of methylen-blue preparations, the results of Ehrlich and of Arnstein were looked on with some suspicion till they were reproduced in Golgi preparations by a number of workers, such as Grassi and Castronovo (1889) on the dog, Ramon y Cajal (1890) on mammal embryos, Van Gehuchten (1890) on rabbits, von Brunn (1892) on man, Retzius (1892a, 1892b, 1894) on fishes, amphibians, reptiles, and mam- mals, and by many other later pO cc ee Se aa workers on various vertebrates. elm fem spleens 6% inches long; b, basal (Fig.6). The results of allrecent sy opto i aes students in this field of histology “1c 1920 Fit 1° support the statement that the olfactory epithelium of vertebrates is composed of at least three classes of cells: basal cells, ordinary epithelial or substentacular cells, and sense cells from which the olfactory fibers take their origin. Thus the opinion of 30 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES Schultze on this subject has been unquestionably and abundantly confirmed. The sustentacular cells are the chief supporting ele- ments of the olfactory epithelium. Hach of these cells has a distal cylindrical portion that contains the yellowish or light brownish pigment so characteristic of the olfac- Fia. 6.—Olfactory epithelium of a young mouse showing the olfactory cells and, to t i two sustentacular cells. Golgi preparation. After Retzius, 1892a, Plate 10, teen tory region. The nuclei of these cells are oval and con- stitute the outermost zone of nuclei in the epithelium. Their proximal portions are more or less irregularly compressed and branched, hence the outlines of these parts are commonly jagged. The basal cells form a single row of block-like elements on the proximal face of the olfactory epithelium. Their short branching processes extend distally among the other cells of the epithelium. The olfactory cells are the most numerous of the three classes of cells in the epithelium. Their nuclei are roundish with well marked nucleoli and form the extensive nucle- ated band between the distal zone of sustentacular nuclei ANATOMY OF THE OLFACTORY ORGAN 31 and the less distinct proximal zone of basal nuclei. Hach of the olfactory nuclei is lodged in an oval cell-body. Proximally this tapers rapidly into a fine olfactory nerve- fiber which eventually enters the olfactory bulb of the brain. Distally the body of the cell extends as a somewhat coarser rod-like structure to the outer surface of the olfac- tory epithelium where it ter- minates in a small enlargement. This enlargement has been called the olfactory vesicle by Van der Stricht (1909) who ascribed to it a centrosomal origin and believed it to play a significant part in olfactory reception. The olfactory vesi- ele carries a cluster of proto- plasmic filaments, the olfactory hairs. (Fig. 7). These hairs are apparently extremely deli- sie Aiea tees risen Sale cate and are easily destroyed; 476, systenjacuar coo, Bint "a0, hence they have escaped obser- ™* * vation by many workers. They were probably seen in the frog as early as 1855 by Eckhard, but they were first gen- erally identified and thoroughly studied by Schultze (1856, 1862) in a number of vertebrates. Apparently they are never very numerous; Schultze (1862) found that in the frog there were five to six hairs on each olfactory cell (Fig. 8), and von Brunn (1892) and Kallius (1905) re- corded six to eight in man. Retzius (1894) noted two to five hairs on each cell in the snake Tropidonotus. Ballo- witz (1904) found ten to twelve or more in Petromyzon, and Alcock (1910) states that in the pig the number varies 32 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES from five to eight. Because of their great delicacy the ol- factory hairs are probably seldom observed to their full length. Schultze (1856) described those of the frog as i Fia. 8.—Isolated olfactory cell and sustentacular cell from a frog. After Schultze, 1862, Plate 1, Fig. 4. long, but Jagodowski (1901) has shown that in the pike the hair may be twice as long as the olfactory cell itself, (Fig. 9) and may reach from the distal end of the cell through the whole thickness of the superimposed slime. So delicate are the distal portions of these hairs that Jagodowski has proposed for them the name of olfactory flagella or lashes. In the opinion of this author the so-called olfactory hairs are only the proximal ends of these lashes, the distal part having disappeared in the course of preparation. The lashes can be demonstrated by means of the Golgi method or by osmic acid. These lashes are without doubt the true receptive elements of the olfactory cells. The secretion in which they are suspended and whose thickness they probably penetrate is produced by the numerous olfactory or Bowman glands whose ducts open out abundantly through the olfac- tory epithelium. 4. Intermediate Zone. In the majority of vertebrates there seems to be a fairly sharp boundary between the respiratory epithelium and the olfactory epithelium. In some mammals, however, these two regions are separated by a considerable intervening area, known as the intermediate zone. This was first described by ANATOMY OF THE OLFACTORY ORGAN 33 Grassi and Castronovo (1889) in the dog,and subsequently was identified by Alcock (1910) in the pig. In this mammal the epithelium of the intermediate zone is thicker than that of the respiratory region and thinner than that of the olfactory region. Besides basal cells it possesses two types of epithelial cells, ciliated cells like those of the respiratory epithelium and \ non-ciliated sustentacular cells like those of the olfactory region. It also contains many olfactory cells, but these cells are not as numerous in the intermediate zone as they are in the olfactory region where they are said to make up about seventy per cent of the cells present. It is plain from the accounts given that the intermediate zone is a region of transition between the two chief nasal _ Fic.9—A Golgi preparation of an regions, the olfactory and the respiratory. ¢lfctory cell from a pike (Esox) in 5. Polymorphic Cells. In most verte- Wipayy only the “a basal - fib brates the olfactory cells exhibit great process are. well shown, but also the uniformity of structure. In the fishes, long peripheral ol- factory flagellum. however, Dogiel (1887) has called attention After Jagodowski, to a polymorphism among these elements, and he has described in addition to the ordinary type of spindle-shaped olfactory cell, cylindrical olfactory cells and conical olfactory cells. These three types have been identified by Morrill (1898) and by Asai (1913) in a selachian (Mustelus) and by Jagodowski (1901) in the pike (Esox). To what extent this polymorphism occurs in other vertebrates and how important it is for a right understanding of the action of the olfactory organ has not yet been determined. 8 34 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES 6. Sense Buds. In 1884 Blaue described what he be- lieved to be sense buds in the olfactory epithelium of certain fishes and amphibians. This observation was not confirmed by later workers and it appears, as Retzius (1892b) has remarked, that the so-called sense buds are not true buds but folds or bands of olfactory epithelium seen in transverse section. The buds subsequently de- scribed by Disse (1896b) in the nose of the calf and shown by him to be supplied by free-nerve terminations are be- lieved by this author to be concerned with taste rather than with smell. These structures, however, are claimed by Kamon (1904) not to be true buds but bud-like appearances produced by the mouths of the Bowman glands. If this is so, no sense buds of any kind are known in the olfactory epithelium of vertebrates. 7. Free-nerve Endings. In 1889 Grassi and Castronovo with some uncertainty described from the epithelium of the intermediate zone of the dog what they regarded as free-nerve endings. Whether these were end-organs of the olfactory nerve-fibers or not, they were unable to determine. In 1892 similar endings were observed by von Brunn at the border of the respiratory region in man. Von Brunn believed these endings to be terminals of the trigeminal nerve and, apparently by mistake, mentioned Ramén y Cajal as their discoverer. Free-nerve endings in the olfactory region were subsequently recorded by Retzius (1892b) in the mouse and frog, by von Lenhossék (1892) in the rabbit, by Morrill (1898) in Mustelus, by Jagodowski (1901) in Esox, by Kallius (1905) in the calf, and by Read (1908) in the kitten. Morrill’s obser- vation for Mustelus has recently been confirmed by Asai (1913). Hence there seems to be no doubt that in addition ANATOMY OF THE OLFACTORY ORGAN 35 to the olfactory cells, free-nerve endings occur in the ol- factory epithelium of vertebrates. The source of the nerve-fibers from which the free- endings of the olfactory epithelium arise is not definitely settled. The fact that these endings may be very near the outer surface of the olfactory epithelium shows that they are not due to the incomplete impregnation of fibers from the olfactory cells as was suggested by Van Gehuchten (1890). Free-endings like those in the olfactory region also occur in the respiratory region and here the only pos- sible source for them is the trigeminal nerve; hence it is probable that this nerve is also the source of the free- nerve endings of the olfactory region. This opinion is sup- ported by the observations of Rubaschkin (1903) who has shown that in certain portions of the olfactory epithelium of the developing chick the two sets of fibers, those from the olfactory nerve and those from the trigeminal nerve, take somewhat different courses and that the trigeminal fibers are the fibers that give rise to the free-endings. (Fig. 10). Thus such evidence as there is favors the opinion first expressed by von Brunn and subsequently reiterated by a number of investigators, that the free- nerve endings of the olfactory region are from the tri- geminal fibers. The vertebrate olfactory epithelium, therefore, has two types of nerve terminations, olfactory cells as the exclusive receptors for the olfactory nerve and free-nerve endings as the probably exclusive endings for the trigeminal nerve. 8. Development of Olfactory Nerve. Since the fibers from the olfactory cells pass as olfactory nerve-fibers to the olfactory bulb and terminate there without direct connections with any other cells, the olfactory cells in the 36 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES nasal epithelium must be their cells of origin, as in fact was shown to be the case for the chick by Disse (1896a, 1897). Here the olfactory nerve-fibers have been demon- strated to grow from certain olfactory epithelial cells into the olfactory bulb, the epithelial cells acting in all respects like neuroblasts Bedford (1904). The trigeminal fibers Fra. 10.—Olfactory epithelium of an embryo chick (ninth day) showing olfactory cells, sustentacular cells, and free-nerve endings of fibers from ganglion cells of the trigeminal nerve. After Rubaschkin, 1903, Fig. 3. must on the other hand grow from trigeminal ganglion cells into the olfactory epithelium there to terminate as free-nerve endings, but of this there is at present no di- rect evidence. 9. Comparative Anatomy of Olfactory Organs. The nasal organs in the lower vertebrates are very different from those in man. In Amphioxus a single sensory pit slightly to the left of the median dorsal line of the head and connected with the anterior end of the nerve-tube is assumed to be an olfactory organ. If this is so, it is prob- able that this pit corresponds to the single median olfac- ANATOMY OF THE OLFACTORY ORGAN 37 tory sac in the cyclostomes notwithstanding the fact that this sac shows evidence in its deeper parts of being a double organ. In consequence of single nasal openings Amphioxus and the cyclostomes are commonly contrasted with other fishes, and in fact with all other vertebrates, and are called monorhine. Those in which the olfactory organs are obviously paired have been designated as amphirhine. In the sharks and rays the paired olfactory pits are situated usually on the ventral side of the snout. (Fig. 11). The single opening of each pit is more or less divided by a fold of skin into an anterior inlet and a posterior outlet the latter sometimes leading into the mouth. As the fish swims through the water and particularly as it takes water into its mouth in breathing, a current of water is passed through each of its olfactory sacs. In this way the olfactory organs become associated with the respiratory current, a condition that is more pronounced in the lung- fishes than in the sharks and rays, for in the lung-fishes the anterior apertures are external and form true anterior nares, and the posterior openings lie within the mouth and correspond to the choane of higher vertebrates. In the highly specialized bony fishes, the paired olfactory pits are almost always on the dorsal aspect of the head and quite distant from the mouth. Each pit has two entirely separate openings, an anterior inlet and a posterior outlet. By means of these two openings a current of water enters and leaves each pit. This current is produced either by ciliary action within the pit (Amiurus) or by the action of the muscles associated with the jaws and gills (Fundulus). In bony fishes, then, the olfactory pits are purely recep- tive and are in no direct way connected with the respira- 38 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES tory current as they are in the sharks and rays, and in the lung-fishes. In the air-inhabiting vertebrates each olfactory sac possesses, as in man, an external inlet, the anterior naris, and a posterior outlet, the choana, opening into the mouth or the pharynx. The olfactory sacs are relatively simple in amphibians, but become progressively more compli- ’ Fia. 11.—Ventral view of the head of a shark (Scyllium) showing the olfactory pits in rela- tion to the mouth. cated in reptiles and birds, and vastly more so in mam- mals. Here the surface of the sac is enormously extended through the development of lateral folds or conche which may be further complicated by the production of second- ary folds. In mammals the more ventral of these conchae, those attached to the maxillary bone, are apparently not concerned with olfaction, but lie in the purely respiratory region of the nasal chamber. The more dorsal conche those from the ethmoid bone, serve as olfactory surfaces. It has been shown that in some mammals, as for instance in Orycteropus, there may be upwards of ten olfactory ANATOMY OF THE OLFACTORY ORGAN 39 conche. Forms that possess these larger numbers of conche are known to be keen-scented and are termed mac- rosmatic. Those in which the number of olfactory conche is small, four or fewer, such as the seals, some whales, monkeys, and man, are known to be less acute of smell and are called microsmatic. Others again, such as the toothed whales, porpoises and the like, in which the olfac- tory organ has almost completely degenerated, are sup- posed to be devoid of olfaction and are called anosmatic. In such forms the nasal cavities have lost their original sensory function and have come to be of importance only in connection with respiration, a purely secondary relation. 10. BrBLioGRAPHY. ALcocK, N. 1910. The Histology of the Nasal Mucous Membrane of the Pig. Anat. Rec., vol. 4, pp. 123-138. ARNSTEIN, C. 1887. Die Methylenblaufarbung als histologische Methode. Anat. Anz., Bd. 2, pp. 125-135. Asal, T. 1913. Untersuchungen iiber die Structur der Riechorgane bei Mustelus levis. Anat. Hefte, Arb., Bd. 49, pp. 441-521. ~ Basucuin, A. 1872. Das Geruchsorgan. Stricker, Handb. Lehre den Genweben, Bd. 2, pp. 964-976. BaLLowiTz, E. 1904. Die Riechzellen des Flussneunauges. Arch. mik. Anat., Bd. 65, pp. 78-95. Bowpen, H. H. 1901. A Bibliography of the Literature on the Organ and Sense of Smell. Jour. Comp. Neurol., vol. 11, pp. i-xl. ¥ Beprorp, E. A. 1904. The Early History of the Olfactory Nerve in Swine. Jour. Comp, Neurol., vol. 14, pp. 390-410. BLavE, J. 1884. Untersuchungen iiber’ den Bau der Nasenchleimhaut bei Fischen und Amphibien. Arch. Anat. Physiol., anat. Abt., 1884, pp. 231-309. V von Brunn, A, 1892. Beitrige zur mikroskopischen Anatomie der men- schlichen Nasenhthle. Arch. mikr. Anat., Bd. 39, pp. 632-651. f DissE, J. 1896a. Ueber die erste Entwickelung des Riechnerven. Sitzb. Gesel. Naturwiss. Marburg, 1896, pp. 77-91. Diss, J. 1896b. Ueber Epithelknospen in der Regio olfactoria der Siuger, Anat, Heft, Abt. 1, Bd. 6, pp. 21-58. 40 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES Disse, J. 1897. Die erste Entwickelung des Riechnerven. Anat. Hefte, Abt. 1, Bd. 9, pp. 255-300. Disse, J. 1901. Riechschleimhaut und Riechnerv bei den Wirbeltieren. Ergeb. Anat. Entwick., Bd. 10, pp. 487-523. Dissg, J. 1902. Riechschleimhaut und Riechnery bei den Wirbeltieren. Ergeb. Anat. Entwick., Bd. 11, pp. 407-436. DocieL, A. 8. 1887. Ueber den Bau des Geruchsorganes bei Ganoiden, Knochen-fischen und Amphibien. Arch. mikr. Anat. Bd. 29, pp. 74-139. Ecxer, A. 1855. Ueber das Epithelium der Riechschleimhaut und die wahrscheinliche Endigung des Geruchnerven. Ber. Gesell. Beford Naturwiss., Freiburg, (Zeit. wiss. Zool., Bd. 8, pp. 303-306.) Eckuarn, C. 1855. Ueber die Endigungsweise des Geruchsnerven. Beitrage Anat. Physiol., Bd. 1, pp. 77-84. Enruicu, P. 1886. Ueber die Methylenblaureaction der lebenden Nerven- substanz. Deutsche med. Wochenschr., Bd. 12, pp. 49-52. GrassI, V. und A. CasTRoNovo. 1889, Beitrag zur Kenntniss des Geruch- sorgans des Hundes. Arch. mikr, Anat., Bd. 34, pp. 385-390. JAcopowskI, K. P, 1901. Zur Frage nach der Endigung der Geruchsnerven bei den Knochenfischen. Anat. Anz., Bd. 19, pp. 257-267. Katuius, E. 1905. Geruchsorgan. Bardeleben, Handb. Anat, Menschen, Bd. 5, Abt. I, Teil 2, pp. 115-242. Kanon, K. 1904. Ueber die “Geruchsknospen”. Arch. mik. Anat., Bd.64, pp. 653-664. Krauser, W. 1876. Allgemeine und microscopische Anatomie, Hannover, 581 pp. von LENHOSSEK, M. 1892. Die Nervemurspriinge und Endigungen im Jacob- son’schen Organj des Kaninchens. Anat. Anz. Bd. 7, pp. 628-635. Morr, A. D. 1898. Innervation of the Olfactory Epithelium. Jour. Comp. Neurol., vol. 8, pp. 180-182. Peter, K. 1901. Die Entwickelung des Geruclsorgans und Jacobsonschen Organs in der Reihe der: Wirbeltiere. Hertwig, Handb. Entwick. Wir- beltiere, Bd. 2, Teil. 2, pp. 1-82. Peter, K. 1911. Entwickelung des Geruchsorgans. Ergeb. Anat. Entwick., Bd. 20, pp. 43-95. Ramon y Casa, 8. 1890. Origen y terminacién de las fibras nerviosas olfactorias. Gaceta sanitaria, Barcelona. Reap, E. A. 1908. A contribution to the knowledge of the Olfactory Appa- ratus in Dog, Cat, and Man. Amer. Jour. Anat., vol. 8, pp. 17-47. . s Rerzius, G. 1892a. Die Endigungsweise des Riechnerven. Biol. Unters., N. F., Bd. 3, pp. 25-28. ANATOMY OF THE OLFACTORY ORGAN 41 Rerzius, G. 1892b. Zur Kenntniss der Nervenendigungen in der Riech- schleimhaut., Biol. Unters., N. F., Bd. 4, pp. 62-64. Retzius, G. 1894. Die Riechzellen der Ophidier. Biol. Unters., N. F., Bd. 6, pp. 48-51. RUBASCHKIN, W. 1903. Ueber die Beziehungen des Nervus trigeminus zur Riechschleimhaut. Anat. Anz., Bd. 22, pp. 407-415. ScHaerrer, J. P. 1916. The Genesis, Development, and Adult Anatomy of the Nasofrontal Region in Man. Amer. Jour. Anat., vol. 20, pp. 125-146. ScuaerFrer, J. P. 1920. The Nose, Paranasal Sinuses, Nasolacrimal Pas- sageways, and Olfactory in Man. Philadelphia, 370 pp. SCHULTZE, M. 1856. Ueber die Endigungsweise des Geruchsnerven. Mon- atsber. Akad. Wissen. Berlin, 1856, pp. 504-514. Scuuttrze, M. 1862. Untersuchungen iiber den Bau der Nasenschleimhaut. Abh. naturf. Gesell. Halle, Bd. 7, pp. 1-100. Van der Srricut, O. 1909. Le Neuro-épithélium olfactif et sa membrane limitante interne. dfém. Acad. Roy. Méd. de Belgique, tome, 20, 45 pp. Van GEHUCHTEN, A. 1890. Contributions a étude de la Muqucuse olfac- tive chez les Mammiféres. La Cellule, tome, 6, pp. 393-407. CHAPTER III. PHYSIOLOGY OF OLFACTION. Contents.—1. Nerves of Olfaction. 2. Passage of Air through the Nasal Cavity. 3. Minimum Stimulus. 4. Physical Condition of Stimulus, Gas or Solution? 5. Olfaction in Fishes. 6. Fatigue and Exhaustion. 7. Quali- ties of Odors. 8. Chemical Relations of Odors. 9. Inade- quate and Adequate Stimuli. 10. Olfactory Reflexes. 11. Bibliography. 1. Nerves of Olfaction. The olfactory region of verte- brates has been shown to possess olfactory cells as ter- minations of the olfactory nerve and free-nerve endings representing in all probability the trigeminal nerve. It has long been the opinion of investigators that the olfac- tory sense is mediated by the endings of the olfactory nerve, but this opinion has not been without its opponents. Thus Magendie, in a series of publications beginning in 1824, came to the conclusion that the trigeminal nerve was the nerve of olfaction and that the so-called olfactory nerve was one whose function was wholly unknown. His opinion was based in part upon experiments on the dog. After the olfactory nerves of this animal had been cut, it was found still to respond to acetic ether and to ammonia. Even when blindfolded a dog with severed olfactory nerves would seize cheese or meat but it would not eat meat sprinkled with tobacco. It was pointed out by Magendie’s critics that many of the stimulating sub- stances used by him, such as ammonia and the like, not 42 PHYSIOLOGY OF OLFACTION 43 only possessed odor but were irritants for mucous sur- faces generally and thus without reference to olfaction could call forth vigorous responses. Magendie, however, claimed that his results were not dependent upon these substances, but could be demonstrated by the use of non- irritants, such as lavender oil. Magendie’s opinion that the trigeminal nerve was the nerve of olfaction was opposed almost from the beginning. Hschricht in 1825 pointed to numerous cases of persons who were anosmic in consequence of the absence of the olfactory nerve or of its degeneration. Bishop in 1833 described a case of paralysis of the trigeminal nerve in which there was, however, full retention of olfaction. Picht (1829) and Dugés (1838), both of whom were incap- able of olfaction in the ordinary sense of the word, were nevertheless easily stimulated through their nasal mem- branes by the vapor of acetic ether, or of ammonia. Val- entin (1839) found that a normal rabbit would sniff the body of a dead one, but that a rabbit whose olfactory nerves had been cut would not thus respond. Schiff (1859) experimented on five pups, in four of which the olfactories were severed, the fifth being retained in a nor- mal condition as a control. After recovery from the op- eration, the four pups in which the nerves had been cut were unable to find the mother’s nipples, and did not dis- tinguish between a man and the mother though they turned their heads away and sneezed when ammonia or ether was administered. Acetic acid stimulated them only when its vapor was very concentrated. These and many other similar results completely overthrew Magendie’s contention and showed that, though the trigeminal endings were concerned with the reception of what may be 44 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES called irritants, true olfaction was accomplished only through the olfactory terminals, which have to do with delicate perfumes, aromas, and the like, many of which were associated with food. The recognition in nasal stimulation of the two classes of substances, irritants acting on trigeminal terminals, and true odors affecting the olfactory endings, is of funda- mental importance, and the failure to appreciate this distinction is responsible in part at least for much of the confusion that exists in what has been written on the olfactory stimulus. As early as 1851 Frohlich pointed out this distinction and called attention to the fact that irri- tants or stimuli for the fifth nerve ordinarily induce vigorous reflexes, respiratory and the like, whereas true odors are in nature much milder and seldom call forth strong responses. It is quite possible that some materials are stimuli for both classes of end-organs; thus tobacco smoke not only carries with it an aroma or true odor but also acts as anirritant. These two actions, however, may depend upon different chemical substances in the smoke. Other stimuli such as oil of mustard or possibly ammonia, that are chemically much more homogeneous than tobacco smoke, may affect, nevertheless, both sets of receptors and thus exhibit the characteristics of both irritants and true odors. A revision of the so-called olfactory stimuli from this standpoint is much to be desired. 2. Passage of Air through the Nasal Cavity. In ordi- nary respiration in man the passage of air through the nasal cavity does not necessarily excite olfaction at once. Sooner or later, however the odor may be slightly sensed after which a few deep breaths or sniffing movements are usually made, whereupon full stimulation ensues. PHYSIOLOGY OF OLFACTION 45 The course that the current of air takes through the nasal chamber during quiet respiration has been studied in several ways. Paulsen in 1882 published the results of ex- periments on the human cadaver. He opened the nasal cavity by sawing through the head of a cadaver close to the median plane. Pieces of red litmus-paper were then placed on different parts of the nasal surface and the two halves of the head were brought together again. By means of a bellows attached to the trachea of the cadaver, the current of air that in life passes through the nasal chambers was imitated. This artificial current was charged with ammonia and thus a means was given of in- dicating the spread of the current by the location of the pieces of litmus-paper that changed from red to blue. As a result of this test it was found that the inspired air took a curved course from the naris to the choana. (Fig. 12). The highest part of this curve was near the middle of the nasal cavity, but this never reached a point as high as the olfactory cleft. When the current was reversed by causing it to enter at the choana and emerge at the external naris, as in expiration, the direction of the current was found to be much the same as in inspiration except that a somewhat lower course was followed. Thus in both inspiration and expiration the current of air is limited to what is more generally regarded as the respira- tory region of the nasal cavity, the olfactory region being essentially undisturbed. Paulsen’s results were confirmed in all essential par- ticulars by a number of later investigators including Franke, Zwaardemaker, Danziger, and Rethi, who worked on dead animals and human cadavers by methods not un- like those used by Paulsen. Franke (1893) sawed open 46 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES the head of a human cadaver in the median plane, replaced the nasal septum with glass and by means of an artificially produced respiratory current showed that smoke in its passage through the nasal cavity remained in the so-called respiratory region. He observed, however, that both in- spiration and expiration were accompanied by strong eceneier Tpiie ied caveatil a over Mhecuel apnurciant nara ae oe oe the lateral wall (left half of figure). After Paulsen, 1882. eddies in the moving air. Kayser (1890) aspirated very light magnesia powder into the respiratory current of a quietly breathing normal subject and then inspected the nasal surfaces by means of a rhinoscope. The magnesia particles accumulated on the moist surfaces of the respir- atory portions of the nose and not on those of the olfac- tory region, thus confirming Paulsen’s results but by a method that was by no means so artificial as that employed by other workers. It may, therefore, ‘be regarded as PHYSIOLOGY OF OLFACTION 47 fairly well established that the current of air that sweeps through the nasal cavity in quiet respiration is limited chiefly to the non-olfactory portion of that cavity. Ac cording to Paulsen and to Zwaardemaker this current even in its eddying effect does not rise above the lower edge of the middle concha or at most, according to Franke, the lower edge of the superior concha. This limitation is probably more pronounced in expiration than in inspiration. Although the experimental evidence does not show that the respiratory current spreads to the olfactory surface of the nose, odorous particles must in some way reach this situation. Zwaardemaker (1895) was led to believe that the diffusion of these particles played an important part in this process, but diffusion is a relatively slow operation and itis very doubtful if it is a significant factor in carry- ing the odorous material to the olfactory receptor. It seems more probable that the shifting pressures that accompany respiration and the slight eddies that are formed in the general current are responsible for a grad- ual change of air in the olfactory cleft. The change thus produced is probably too slight to be detected easily by the means heretofore employed in tracing the current and yet it may be sufficient to initiate such olfaction as occurs in quiet respiration. Olfaction thus once begun would naturally excite sniffing and this process seems to be entirely sufficient to account for a rapid change of air in the olfactory cleft whereby olfaction would be brought to full height. Thus air currents are certainly the chief if not the sole factors concerned with transporting the odorous particles to the olfactory membranes. The accumulation of odorous materials on the olfac- 48 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES tory surfaces may be much intensified by the condensa- tion of moisture within the nasal cavity. Zwaardemaker (1917) has called attention to the fact that a fog formed from a vaporized salt solution is very much less stable when it includes odorous substances than when it does not. This condition is believed to depend upon the elec- tric charges carried by the particles concerned, and Durand (1918a, 1918b) recently claimed that olfaction is more or less dependent upon an appropriate hygro- metric state in the olfactory atmosphere and that what- ever facilitates the condensation of watery vapor there facilitates olfaction. Among the older physiologists Bidder (1844) main- tained that olfaction was possible on inspiration and that expired air could not stimulate the organ of smell. Paul- sen’s observations show that this opinion is improbable and the direct test of breathing odorous air in through the mouth and out through the nasal cavity has de- monstrated that it is quite erroneous. The olfactory sensations produced on expiration are noticeably less than on inspiration and this is probably due partly to the lower course maintained in the nasal cavity by the ex- pired air and partly to the previous elimination of much of the odorous material by attachment to the moist sur- faces of the mouth, pharynx, and other parts over which the air passes on its way to the nasal chamber. Never- theless, as Nagel (1904) has pointed out, the odors of our food during mastication are the results of stimulating material that reaches the olfactory surfaces through the choane rather than through the external nares. The importance of these odors in promoting the various kinds PHYSIOLOGY OF OLFACTION 49 fe of digestive reflexes, muscular, secretory, and so forth, has long been recognized. 3. Minimum Stimulus. The common belief that the olfactory stimulus consists of minute material particles suspended in the air current of the olfactory organ is supported by the observation that odors may be carried on the wind in a definite direction many miles. Odors do not emanate from a given center and disperse in all directions as sound and light do. Moreover many sub- stances, such as arsenic, that are odorless under ordinary circumstances, give out an odor after they have been heated sufficiently to volatilize. The fact, discovered in 1917 by Woodrow and Karpman, that the adaptation time for olfaction—the time needed for an olfactory sensation to wane completely—is directly proportional to the vapor tension of the odorous material shows that olfactory stimulation is due to the activity of gaseous particles. These and other like observations have led to the conclu- sion, now generally accepted, that the olfactory organs are normally stimulated by material particles, and not by disturbances of a non-material character. Some odorous bodies such as musk are well known to give out these material particlesfora very considerable time without appreciably changing weight. From the standpoint of the receptor this indicates that olfaction is called forth by an infinitesimally small amount of sub- stance, and measurements directed toward testing this question justify the conclusion. These measurements have been made in a variety of ways. One method of procedure is that of evaporating a given weight of odorous material in a known volume of air and then testing the air by sniffing it. This method lends 4 50 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES itself readily to the determination of absolute measure- ments but it is not so easily applied to questions involv- ing the comparison of odors. For the measurement of olfactory acuity, but especially for the comparison of odors, Zwaardemaker invented an ingenious piece of ap- paratus called an olfactometer. (Fig. 13). This consists of two tubes that slide one within the other and so shaped that one end of the inner tube may be applied to the nostril. The odorous material is carried on the inner surface of the outer tube. When the inner tube, which is graduated, is slipped into the outer one so as to cover Pereeeren J) | Olfacties Fic. 13.—Simple rubber olfactometer. After Zwaardemaker, 1895, Fig. 14. completely its inner face and air is drawn into the nostril through the tube, the odorous surface being covered gives out no particles and no odor is perceived. If, now, the inner tube is withdrawn a certain distance so that a given surface of odorous material is exposed to the cur- rent of air, odorous particles escape into the current and these may be sufficient in amount to call forth olfaction. By adjusting the inner tube in relation to the outer one whereby more or less of the odorous surface is exposed, a point can be found where minimum stimulation occurs. The amount of odorous substance delivered under these circumstances to the air current has been designated by Zwaardemaker as an olfactie, the unit of olfactory stimu- lation. Having determined for a given substance the area necessary for the delivery of one olfactie, doubling PHYSIOLOGY OF OLFACTION 51 that surface by an appropriate movement of the inner tube will produce a stimulus of two olfacties and so forth. Thus a graded series of measured olfactory stim- uli can easily be obtained. Further, by using outer tubes carrying different odorous substances, various com- parisons can be instituted as measured in olfacties. Moreover, a double olfactometer (Fig. 14) may be easily oe S| da 14.—Double olfactometer. After Zwaardemaker, 1895, Fig. 15. devised in that two single olfactometers may be combined so that one current carrying an odorous material of a given concentration may be introduced into one nostril and another carrying a second odorous substance of known concentration can be introduced into the other nostril, or both currents may be united and the odorous mixture thus produced can be let into one nostril. Thus a variety of comparisons may be easily made. Van Dam (1917b) has modified Zwaardemaker’s ap- paratus by applying the odorous material in the form of 52 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES a rod instead of a coating to the inside of a tube. The rod is made of paraffin mixed in a definite proportion with the odorous substance and the extent to which the rod is exposed in the olfactometer tube is a measure of the concentration of the odorous particles in the air current. Rods of metal, platinum, gold, or zinc, have also been used; these have been charged by immersing them in an atmosphere of odorous material for a given length of time and then tested. The odorous particles gather on their surfaces and are subsequently freed. The success of this method makes it clear that in the original evapora- tion method more or less of the odorous material must become ineffective in that it adheres to the walls of the container in which the evaporation is carried out. As a means of avoiding these and other difficulties Allison and Katz (1919) have recently employed in the testing of stenches a type of odiometer that for accuracy of work bids fair to replace most of the other devices. It consists of a number of Venturi-type flow-meters so arranged that a measured volume of air can be passed at a uniform rate through or over the chemical, and this air is then mixed with another measured volume of pure air also flowing at a uniform rate. The concentration of the chemical is measured by determining its loss in weight after a measured volume of air has passed through or over it. From this loss of weight and the to- tal volume of air with which the chemical has been mixed, the concentration in milligrams per liter of air is deter- mined. The mixture of air and chemical passes finally through a tube with a glass funnel at the open end. The funnel is placed over the nose of the person who by a sin- gle inhalation tests the mixture. The odors are rated ar- bitrarily as detectable, faint, quite noticeable, strong or PHYSIOLOGY OF OLFACTION 58 very strong. By this means extremely accurate quanti- tative results can be obtained. In testing olfactory acuity the majority of workers have used the method of evaporating a known weight of substance in a given volume of air. By this method Val- entin (1848) found that 1/2,000,000 of a milligram of oil of rose per cubic centimeter of air was odorous. Assum- ing that 100 cubic centimeters of this mixture were nec- essary for olfaction, he concluded that the total weight of oil of rose used in this operation was the very small amount of 1/20,000 of a milligram. Valentin also found that water containing 1/2,000,000,000 of its weight of tincture of musk had a perceptible odor whereas water containing only 1/3,300,000,000 of this tincture could not be distinguished from ordinary water. One gram of the odorous mixture called forth the characteristic smell and contained only 1/2,000,000 of a milligram of tincture of musk. More significant measurements were made by Fischer and Penzoldt (1886) on chlorphenol and mereaptan. One milligram of chlorphenol was evaporated in a room of 230 cubic meters capacity and was thoroughly mixed with the air. This dilution called forth an unquestionable ol- factory sensation. It contained 1/230,000,000 of a milli- gram of chlorphenol per cubic centimeter of air or, if it is assumed that 50 cubic centimeters of air are the mini- mum needful for olfaction, the total amount of chlor- phenol necessary was found to be 1/4,600,000 of a milligram. By a similar method it was shown that mercaptan, a liquid with a penetrating garlic odor, could be recognized at a concentration of 1/23,000,000,000 of a milligram per cubic centimeter, a concentration that would yield 1/460,000,000 of a milligram for every 50 54 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES cubic centimeters of air. Notwithstanding this infinites- imally small amount of mercaptan, the quantity, just designated was estimated by von Frey (1904) to contain some 200,000,000,000 molecules of mercaptan. Passy (1892a, 1892b) has made similar minimum de- terminations for a number of substances and has shown that artificial musk, probably the most powerful of all known odorous materials, is about a thousand times stronger than natural musk. In his other determinations he found that olfactory acuity ranged in thousandths of a milligram per liter of air from camphor at 5 to vanillin at from 0.005 to 0.0005. The last determination may be expressed as equivalent to 1/2,000,000,000 of a milligram of vanillin in a cubic centimeter of air, a high dilution but still not so extreme as that already recorded by Fischer and Penzoldt for mercaptan. The details of the more important of Passy’s deter- minations are given in the following table in which ol- factory acuity, as measured by the minimum amount of substance that was stimulating to the several persons tested, is expressed in thousandths of a milligram per liter of air. Table I. Minimum concentrations for olfaction in thousandths of a milligram of substance per liter of air (Passy, 1892b). Substances Thousandths of a milligram Camphor’ si..08 vice guesses selves ame ve Be 5. Ether’ diveds hanien & flowery fruity ee ee |= burnt, -~ ae ~ ‘N . TeEsStnous Spicy Fia. 17.—Olfactory prism. After Henning, 1916, Fig. 4. at each corner of a three-sided prism which he calls the olfactory prism (Fig. 17). From each corner of this prism lines may be imagined to pass out to the other corners ; these lines traverse either the edges of the prism or pass over its faces and mark the positions of all in- termediate odors. Thus all odors, be they fundamental or intermediate, find places on the surface of the prism. Relations indicated by lines within the prism and con- necting any two points on its surface indicate only mixed odors. Thus by means of a figure of three dimen- sions Henning brings into clear view the relations he conceives to exist between the six fundamental odors, 76 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES their intermediates and mixtures. So far as an arrange- ment of odors is concerned the clarity of Henning’s scheme is at once its most attractive and most suspi- cious feature. 8. Chemical Relations of Odors. The scientific value of any classification of odors will depend upon the success with which such a classification brings the odor- ous substances as stimuli into relation with the receptor. A satisfactory classification ought to make evident the number of elements or components concerned in olfac- tion. That olfaction is made up of a number of compo- nents is far from established, but what may be called the component theory of olfacton is generally assumed by the majority of writers on this subject Zwaardemaker (1895). That the classification outlined by Zwaarde- maker shows very little of this feature is readily admit- ted even by this author himself. Quite aside from the fact that it may include irritants as well as true odorous substances, its classes do not stand up well under experi- mental test. Nagel (1897) tested this question in an investigation of the odors of vanillin and cumarin. These two substances, according to Zwaardemaker’s classification, belong not only to, the same class of bal- samic odors but to the same subdivision, the vanilla odor. They ought, therefore, to show considerable olfactory similarity. Nagel attempted to test this relationship by ascertaining whether the temporary exhaustion of the ol- factory organ by one of these substances would influence its receptive capacity for the other. To carry out this he prepared an aqueous solution of the two substances in such proportions that the smell of only vanillin could be recognized. He then exhausted the olfactory organ PHYSIOLOGY OF OLFACTION 77 for vanillin by smelling for a long time a pure solution of this material. On testing now the solution containing the mixture of substances, it was found to smell only of cumarin. Thus the exhaustion of the olfactory sur- face for vanillin did not prevent stimulation by cumarin. The placing of these two substances in the same subdi- vison is, therefore, obviously artificial. Similar evidence as to the artificiality of Zwaarde- maker’s classifications had also been obtained from the study of persons suffering from partial anosmia and from neither this line of investigation nor from that dealing with partial exhaustion has there come any special jus- tification of the conventional olfactory groupings. Yet it is admitted on all sides that olfaction is essen- tially a chemical process. And, as a matter of fact, some progress has been made in discovering relations between chemical structure and olfactory sensation. This is' not necessarily of a general nature, but seems! usually to be limited to narrow ranges. Thus among the aleohols Passy (1892c) has discovered that the olfactory potency increases progressively in passing over this se- ries from methyl to amyl as shown in Table V. Backman (1917c) has likewise determined that im the methylbenzene series olfactory acuity for benzene, toluene, xylene, cumene, and durene increases as the sub- stitute methyl group increases. Changes in the quality of odors also follow some natu- ral series of organic compounds as has been pointed out by Haycraft (1900) in the following etherial salts. Ethyl acetate with acetic etherial odor. Propyl acetate with acetic odor and slight flavor. Butyl acetate with slight acetic odor and pineapple flavor. 78 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES Amy] acetate with no acetic odor but well marked pine- apple flavor. Ethyl acetate and amyl acetate have entirely distinct odors, but when propyl acetate and butyl acetate are taken into consideration the four compounds form a se- ries in which there is a transition in odors corresponding Table V. Estimated potencies of alcohols, Passy (1892c). Alcohol Estimated Potency Methylia scarce cig sans sieeve ene es + Mth yl. wscssdogsdaast sees ccsad seses 4 PHOPY lisse eascn dca ince eB. Gea Bea coo ee aes 100 Butyl wie ch icine da see o Gites ase Bah eo 1000 AMMA wisi s cqdivinn iwe MWe ee Wale ead Bie 10000 to the changes in chemical structure. Other series of homologues, however, such as the one tested by Huyer (1917), analine, o-, m-, and p-toluidine, xylidine, and cu- mioline, show no such relations. Not a few investigators have suggested that the odors of many substances depend upon the number and ar- rangement of certain chemical radicals contained within the odorous molecule. Such radicals are commonly called osmophoric groups. Perhaps one of the most considerable studies of this kind was that carried out by Cohn (1904), but without commensurate results. The most recent and ambitious of these attempts is by Hen- ning (1916) whose classification of odors has already been referred to. Henning’s studies on the relations of odors to chemical constitution have to do almost entirely with the aromatic compounds, though there is no reason to believe that his generalizations, if true, may not be extended eventually PHYSIOLOGY OF OLFACTION 79 to the aliphatic series. He abandons the idea that spe- cial odors are to be associated with particular osmopho- ric groups. In odors these groups are significant, not because of the structure they themselves possess, but because of the positions they may occupy on the benzene ring. Osmophoric groups are such as the hydroxyl, al- dehyde, keton, ester, nitro, and nitril groups. None of these, however, is associated with a particular odor, but any one may be the occasion of odor, if it occupies an appropriate place on a benzene ring. The position on the ring not the particular radical, according to Henning, is the determining factor so far as odor is concerned. Henning is further convinced that in a general way types of chemical constitution can be indicated for the six groups of odors that he was able to distinguish (Fig. 18). Thus the class of spicy odors is represented by compounds in which the osmophoric groups are in para-position (Fig. 18a), as in anisaldehyde. In the flowery odors the osmophoric groups are in the meta- or the ortho-positions (Fig. 18b), as in tuberon. In the fruity odors the groups are forked (Fig. 18c) as in cit- ral. In the resinous odors the groups are within the ring (Fig. 18d) as in pinene. In the burnt odors the ring is smooth (Fig. 18e) as in pyridin, and in the foul odors the ring is fragmentary (Fig. 18f) as in cacodyl. In this way each class of odors is associated with a spe- cial feature in the constitution of the molecule though not necessarily with a particular osmophoric group. In- termediate odors are due to combinations of groupings which partake of the nature of the two classes between which the intermediate lies. Thus vanillin has an odor between spicy and flowery and its three osmophoric 80 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES groups (Fig. 18g) are attached so as to represent both the para-position (spicy) and the ortho-position (flow- ery). By this ingenious system Henning has attempted to connect odor with chemical constitution and though : -<< >= a ae a ax sz . i ad e f Pa Fig. 18.—Generalized diagrams of the molecular structure of the six classes of aromatic bodies that serve as olfactory stimuli according to Henning (1916); a, for spicy odors; b, for flowery odors; c, for fruity odors; d, for resinous odors; e, for burnt odors; f, for foul odors; and g, for an intermediate odor between spicy and flowery. the attempt is avowedly fragmentary and may be open to much subsequent modification, it gives promise of the solution of a problem that heretofore has been most baffling. 9. Inadequate and Adequate Stimuli. Inadequate olfactory stimuli are apparently very few in number and not well known. Thermal stimuli when applied to the PHYSIOLOGY OF OLFACTION 81 olfactory organs are said to call forth no sensations of smell, and Valentin’s statement that mechanical stimuli will produce unpleasant olfactory sensations has not been confirmed. Aronsohn (1884b), after filling the nasal eavity with warm physiological salt solution led a direct electric current through this cavity with the result that certain obscure sensations were produced depending upon whether the anode or the cathode was within the nose. With the anode in the nose a sensation was called forth on opening the circuit; with the cathode in the nose on closing it. There was, however, no evidence to show that these effects were not due to a stimuation of tri- geminal endings instead of olfactory endings. Althaus in 1869 recorded as the outcome of electrical stimulation a phosphorous-like smell in a patient suffering from double trigeminal paralysis. Apparently the electric current is a true inadequate stimulus for the olfactory organ, but its peculiarities are very incompletely under- stood. Aside from this and the effects from solutions as described by Veress, inadequate olfactory stimulation seems not to exist. 7 The adequate olfactory stimulus for both water-in- habiting and air-inhabiting vertebrates is a solution in contact with the olfactory hairs and perhaps formed in part within these bodies. The solvent is probably first the olfactory mucous which receives the solute from the current of water or of air that passes over its outer sur- face. This watery solvent, which from its nature must be almost universal in its dissolving power, passes the solute on to the olfactory hairs whose capacity as receptors is probably limited by their lipoid composition. Only those substances that are soluble in lipoids can be taken up by 6 82 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES the hairs, a process that must precede the initiation of the olfactory nerve-impulse. The solute may be any one of an immense variety of substances whose primary char- acteristics are that they are not only soluble in water but also in oil. The amount of these substances necessary for olfaction even in the case of the least odorous of them is very small and in that of the most odorous in- credibly small. The amounts that are usually estimated for olfaction are those contained in what is believed to be the minimum volume of water or of air necessary for stimulation, but of the very minute amount of odor- ous substance contained in this volume only a very small fraction of it can reach the olfactory hairs. Much must be carried away in the general current or left stranded on non-olfactory portions of the nasal surfaces. Whether the olfactory hairs can concentrate this material or not remains to be ascertained, but even assuming that they can, the effective concentration must be of an extremely low order. The substances thus brought in solution into the ol- factory hairs must initiate those nervous changes that eventually produce the olfactory sensations. There ought, therefore, to be some relation between these sub- stances and the resulting sensations. It is generally assumed that the substances that act as olfactory stimuli fall into classes associated with corresponding classes of sensations. As already indicated this conception may be called the component theory of olfaction, and if we assume, for instance, that the six classes of odors dis- tinguished by Henning are separate classes, a view that Henning, however, opposes, then these classes would PHYSIOLOGY OF OLFACTION 83 represent the olfactory components that physiologists have sought for so long. The very existence of partial anosmia implies olfac- tory components the inactivity of one of which is ac- countable for the partial defect. But such cases are too little known to admit of clear interpretation. Thus Aronsohn’s observation (1886) that partial anosmia pro- duced by the exhaustion of the nose through ammonium sulphide leaves that organ sensitive to etherial oils but insensitive to hydrogen sulphide, hydrochloric acid and bromine, may be a differential effect between true odors (olfactory endings) and irritants (trigeminal endings), and not between groups of true odors. Nevertheless it must be in this direction that an experimental analysis of the general problem of olfaction will eventually proceed. From this standpoint the condition presented by mixed odors is of significance. At least two classes of odor mixtures are to be distinguished, one spurious and the other real. Spurious mixed odors are those in which the gases or vapors act chemically on each other and thus produce a third substance which may or may not have an odor of its own. Thus ammonia and acetic acid both stimulate the nose, but when mixed they possess no odor for they combine to form odorless ammonium acetate. Obviously such instances are not, accurately speaking, instances of mixed odors. On the other hand there are many pairs of odorous substances in which one member does not act upon the other chemically and consequently in which the two are left to act independently on the ol- factory receptors. Such double stimuli, from the stand- point of the component theory might be expected to excite two sensations, but apparently this is not always the 84 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES case. If in a pair of such odors one is much stronger than the other, its smell dominates completely. If, how- ever, the two odors are closely balanced a true odor may result which in quality is said to be unlike that of either component. Novel odors of this kind may be produced, according to Aronsohn (1886), by such combinations as cologne water and oil of orange, cologne water aud oil of lemon, oil of bergamot and oil of orange, and so forth. The condition that thus produces a noval odor is one of considerable delicacy and may be easily upset by the greater exhausting effect of one or other of the components thus allowing the less exhausted member to assert itself and to call forth its own peculiar sensation. The presence of a sensation different from those of the pair of stimuli producing that sensation, might seem to be a condition adverse to the component theory, but it must be remem- bered that in vision, in which the component conception is fundamental, an exact parallel occurs. Thus when a pure orange light is mixed with a pure green light, there may result a sensation of yellow that is wholly unlike that appropriate to either member of the combination, and that, as a matter of fact, may be indistinguishable from a sensation of yellow produced by a pure yellow light. Thus in accepting the component theory of sensory activity it must be admitted that two stimuli together may excite a receptor in precisely the same way as a third and entirely different stimulus may do. The exist- ence of a novel olfactory sensation due to the simultane- ous activity of two independent stimuli is therefore, no serious obstacle to this theory. The condition of double olfactory stimulation that has just been described must not be confused with a kind PHYSIOLOGY OF OLFACTION 85 of double stimulation that has been much studied. Val- entin observed that when ether and balsam of Peru were smelled at the same time one by one nostril and the other by the other nostril, the odors are perceived not together but alternately and Valentin believed that there was a sensory conflict here as in vision, when one eye is directed to a field of one color and the other eye to one of another color. Aronsohn (1886) noted a similar con- flict between the smell of camphor and that of oil of lemon. He also discovered that under similar circum- Table VI. Pairs of neutralizing odors (Zwaardemaker, 1895, p. 168). Pairs of odorous bodies Neutralizing Strength in olfacties Cedarwood and rubber....................., 2.75:14 Benzoin and rubber...............-. 000 eens 3.5 :10 Paraffin and rubber..............-..0.020065 8.5 :14 Rubber and Waki... nocns asc ee aan ons ane 14:28 Rubber and balsam of Tolu.................. 14:70 Wax and balsam of Tolu.................... 40 :90 Paraffin and wax........ 0.0.0. cece eee eee 10:20 stances one smell could overcome another. Thus the smell of camphor was neutralized by the smell of pe- troleum, cologne water, oil of juniper and so forth. This question was investigated much more fully by Zwaardemaker (1895) who employed for this purpose his double olfactometor. By this means it was compara- tively easy to balance odors and then lead one into one nasal cavity and the other into the other cavity. In this way complete neutralization could be attained with great accuracy. Table VI gives a list of neutralizing pairs of odors and the intensity in olfacties at which Zwaarde- maker found neutralization to occur. 86 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES It is needless to say that since in this form of double stimulation one stimulus is applied to one olfactory organ and the other to the other organ, the phenomenon of neu- tralization cannot depend upon the chemical action of one odor upon the other, for the odorous materials are not allowed to mingle. The fact that they are separately applied to different receptors shows that this type of conflict and of neutralization must have a central origin. 10. Olfactory Reflexes. In discussing the relations of the two categories of nasal stimuli, irritants and true odors, Fréhlich attributed reflex action to the first but not to the second, and it is true that nasal irritants almost invariably call forth vigorous respiratory re- sponses, such as sneezing, whereas true odors are seldom followed by reactions of a marked kind. Pawlow, how- ever, has pointed out the great importance of true odors in exciting and, in a way, in controlling the whole chain of digestive secretions, a process just as significantly reflex as sneezing but not so easily observed. Both classes of stimuli, then, are followed by abundant and important reflexes, but in one class these are of a kind easily noticed, in the other they are more hidden. Although the olfactory organs in man are unques- tionably concerned with the odors of the food that is being masticated, they are much more concerned with the odors of the environment. From this standpoint the olfactory organs are properly classed as distance-recep- tors or receptors affected by stimuli that emanate from more remote points in the surroundings. In consequence our olfactory sensations are in a way projected into the exterior and we seek, avoid, or recognize the distant body by its odor. The smell of a skunk is unquestionably a PHYSIOLOGY OF OLFACTION 87 protective odor in that it implies that it can be sensed by other animals that will thereupon avoid its source. The great delicacy of olfaction among the higher animals by which they can scent the hunter is well known. Other odors have much to do with sexual activities whereby one sex is led to find the other or is otherwise excited to ac- tivity. But the prime service of olfaction is in the quest of food. From the fishes to the mammals olfaction serves as a means of discovering hidden or remote food and in this respect it is a highly significant sense for the direction of locomotion. In man and other microsmatic forms much of the keenness of olfaction has disappeared and yet the high development of this sense in our an- cestry has left such a profound impression on the organization of our central nervous apparatus that we are often surprised by the power of our olfactory associations. BIBLIOGRAPHY A. MonocGraPus. Brpper, F. 1844. Riechen. Wagner, Handwérterbuch Physiol., Bd. 2, ipp. 916-926. Haycrart, J. B. 1900 The Sense of Smell. Schafer, Textbook of Physiology, vol. 2, pp. 1246-1258. Hennine, H. 1915-1916. Der Geruch. Zeitschr. Psych., Bd. 73, pp. 161-257, Bd. 74, pp. 305-434, Bd. 75, pp. 177-230, Bd. 76, pp. 1-127. Hennine, H. 1916, Der Geruch. Leipzig, 533 pp. LaRGUIER DES BANCELS, J. 1912, Le Gott et VOdorat. Paris, 94, pp. Lucrani, L. 1917. Human Physiology, vol. 4. London, 667 pp. Nace, W. 1904. Der Geruchssinn. Nagel, Handb. Physiol. Menschen, Bd. 3, pp. 589-620. Srernzere, W. 1906. Geschmack und Geruch. Berlin, 149 pp. Von Vintscueau, M. 1880. Physiologie des Geruchssinnes Hermann, Handb. Physiol., Bd. 3, Teil 2, pp. 225-286. ZWAARDEMAKER, H. 1895. Die Physiologie des Geruchs. Leipzig, 324 pp. 88 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES B. SPECIAL CONTRIBUTIONS Auuison, V. C., and 8. H. Karz. 1919. An investigation of Stenches and Odors for Industrial Purposes, Jour. Industr. Engineer. Chemistry, vol. 11, pp. 336-338, AtTuaus, J. 1869. On Certain Points in the Physiology and Pathology of the Fifth Pair of Cranial Nerves. Med. Chir. Trans., vol. 52, pp. 27-42, Aronsoun, E, 1884a. Beitriige zur Physiologie des Geruchs. Arch. Anat. Physiol., physiol, Abt., 1884, pp. 163-167. Aronsoun, E, 1884b, Ueber elecktrische Geruchsempfindung. Arch. Anat. Physiol., physiol. Abt., 1884, pp. 460-465. AronsouNn, E. 1886. Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Physiologie des Geruchs. Arch. Anat. Physiol., physiol. Abt., 1886, pp. 320-357. Backman, E. L. 1917a. Note sur la puissance des odeurs et leur solubi- lité dans l’eau et dans Vhuile. Jour. Physiol. Pathol. Gen., tome 17, pp. 1-4. BackMaNn, E. L. 1917b. Ueber die Verstaubungselektricitiit. Arch. ges. Physiol., Bd. 168, pp. 351-371. BackMaN, E. L. 1917c. Olfactology of the Methyl-benzene Series. Proc. Akad. Wetensch., Amsterdam, vol. 19. pp. 943-956. Baciion1, S. 1909. Contributions expérimentales 4 la physiologie du sens olfactif et du sens tactile des animaux marins. Arch. Ital. Biol., tome 52, pp. 225-230. Bacviont, S. 1913. Die niederen Sinne. Wainterstcin, Handb. vergl. Phys- iol., Bd. 4, pp. 520-554. Bisuop, J. 1833. Observations on the physiology of the nerves of sensation, illustrated by a case of paralysis of the fifth pair. Proc. Roy. Soo., London, vol. 3, pp. 205-206. BLAKESLEE, A. F, 1918. Unlike Reactions of Different Individuals to Fragrance in Verbena Flowers. Science, vol. 48, pp. 298-299. Conn, G. 1904. Die Riechstoffe. Braunschweig, 219 pp. CopELAND, M. 1912. The Olfactory Reactions of the Puffer or Swellfish. Jour. Exp. Zool., vol. 12, pp. 363-368. CopeLanD, M. 1913. The Olfactory Reactions of the Spotted Newt, Die- myctylus viridescens (Rafinesque). Jour. An, Behavior, vol. 3, pp. 260-273. Ducts, A. 1838. Traité de physiologie. Tome 1, Montpellier, 526 pp. Duranp, A. 1918a. Sur Polfacion. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci., Paris, tome 166, pp. 129-130. Duranp, A. 1918b. Corrélation entre les phénoménes de condensation. Compt. rendu Acad. Sci. Paris, tome 166, pp. 532-535. Durrans, T. H. 1919. Odor and Chemical Constitution. Perf. Ess. Oil Rec., vol. 10, pp. 104-136. PHYSIOLOGY OF OLFACTION 89 Escuricut, D. F. 1825. De functionis nervorum faciei et olfactus organi. Hafnie, 82 pp. FISCHER, E. unp F, PENzoLpT. 1886. Ueber die Empfindlichkeit des Geruchs- sinnes. Sitzb. phys.-med. Soc.Erlangen, Bd. 18, pp. 7-10. FRANKE, G. 1893. Experimentelle Untersuchungen ueber Luftdruck, Luftbe- wegung und Luftwechsel in der Nase und ihren Nebenhéhlen. Arch. Laryny. Rhinol., Bd. 1, pp. 230-249. von Frey, M. 1904, Vorlesungen iiber Physiologie. Berlin, 392 pp. FROHLICH, R. 1851. Ueber einige Modificationen des Geruchssinnes. Sitzb. Akad. Wiss. Wien, math.-nat. Cl., Bd. 6, pp. 322-338. GaRMAN, 8S. 1913. The Plagiostomia. Mem, Mus. Comp. Zodl., vol. 36, pp. 1-515. GuLaseEr, QO. 1918. Hereditary Deficiencies in the Sense of Smell. Science, vol. 48, pp. 647-648. Huyenr, C. 1917. De Olfactologie van aniline en homologen (Thesis, Utrecht). Jacopowskl, K. P. 1901. Zur Frage nach der Endigung des Geruchsnerven bei den Knochenfischen. Anat. Anz., Bd. 19, pp. 257-267. Kayser R. 1890. Ueber den Weg der Athmungsluft durch die Nase. Zeitschr. Ohrenheilk., Bd. 20, pp. 96-109. Kremer, J. H. 1917. Adsorption de matiéres odorantes et de narcotiques odorants par les lipoides. Arch, néerl. physiol., tome 1, pp. 715-725, Loes, J, 1920. Chemical character and physiological action of the potassium ion Jour. gen. Physiol., vol. 3, pp. 237-245. Logs, R. F. 1920. Radioactivity and physiological action of potassium. Jour. gen. Physiol., vol. 3, pp. 229-236. MaceEnpIE, F. 1824. Le nerf olfactif est-il Vorgane de loderat. Jour. physiol. expér. pathol., tome 4, pp. 169-176. NacEL, W. 1894. Vergleichend physiologische und anatomische Unter- suchungen tiber den Geruchs- und Geschmachssinn. Bibl. Zool., Bd. 7, Heft 18, 207 pp. NaGEL, W. 1897. Ueber Mischgeriiche und die Komponentengliederung des Geruchssinnes. Zeit. Psych. Physiol. Sinnesorg., Bd, 15, pp. 82-101. OumsteD, J. M. D. 1918. Experiments on the Nature of the Sense of Smell in the Common Catfish, Amiurus. Amer. Jour. Physiol., vol. 46, pp. 443-458. Parker, G.H. 1910. The Olfactory Reactions in Fishes. Jour. Exp. Zodl., vol. 8, pp. 535-542. Parker, G. H. 1911. The Olfactory Reactions of the Common Killifish. Jour. Exp. Zoél., vol. 10, pp. 1-5. Parker, G. H. 1914. The Directive Influence of the Sense of Smell in the Dogfish. Bull. U. 8S. Bureau Fisheries, vol. 33, pp. 61-68. 90 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES Parker, G. H., and R. E. Suetpon, 1913. The Sense of Smell in Fishes. Bull. U. S. Bureau Fisheries, vol. 32, pp. 33-46. Parxer, G. H., and E. M. Sraprer. 1913, On certain Distinctions between Taste and Smell. Amer. Jour. Physiol., vol. 32, pp. 230-240. Passy, J. 1892a. Note sur les minimums perceptibles de quelques odeurs. Compt. rend. Soc. Biol., Paris, tome 44, pp. 84-88. Passy, J. 1892b. Sur la perception des odeurs. Compt. rend. Soc. Biol., Paris, tome 44, pp. 239-243. Passy, J. 1892c. Les propriétés odorantes des alcools de la série grasse. Compt. rend. Acad. Sci., Paris, tome 114, pp. 1140-1143. PauLsen, E. 1882. Experimentelle Untersuchungen iiber die Stromung der Luft in der Nasenhihle. Siteb. Akad. Wiss., Wien, math.-nat. Cl., Bd. 85, Abt. 3, pp. 352-373. Picut, F. 1829. De Gustus et olfactus nexu, praesertim argumentis pathologicis et experimentis illustrato. Berolini, 31 pp. Prins, H. J. 1917. Relation between Odor and Constitution. Perf. Essent. Oil Record, vol. 8, pp. 222-223. Reuter, C. 1900. Onderzoekingen gedaan in het physiol. labor. Utrechtsche hocheschool. Quoted from Luciani, Human Physiology, vol. 4, p. 190. Risser, J. 1914. Olfactory Reactions in Amphibians. Jour. Exp. Zodl., vol. 16, pp. 617-652. RotteTtT, A. 1899. Beitriige zur Physiologie des Geruchs, des Geschmacks, der Hantsinne und der Sinne in Allgemeinen. Arch. ges. Physiol., Bd. 74, pp. 383-465. Scuirr, M. 1859. Der erste Hirnnerv ist der Geruchsnerv. Moleschott, Untersuch., Bd. 6. ScHULTzZE, M. 1862. Untersuchungen iiber den Ban der Nasenschleim- haut. Abh. naturf. Gesel. Halle, Bd. 7 pp. 1-100. SHELpon, R. E. 1909. The Reactions of Dogfish to Chemical Stimuli. Jour, Comp. Neurol., vol. 19, pp. 273-311. SHELDON, |R. E. 1911. The Sense of Smell in Selachians. Jour. Exp. Zo6l., vol. 10, pp. 51-62. Srerner, J. 1888. Die Functionen des Centralnervensystems und ihre Phylogenese. Braunschweig, 127 pp. TourtuaL, C. T. 1827. Die Sinne des Menschen in den wechselseitigen Beziehungen ihres psychischen und organischen Lebens. Miinster. Von UEXKULL, J. 1895. Vergleichend-sinnesphysiologische Untersuchungen. Zeitschr. Biol., Bd. 32, pp. 549-566. VALENTIN, G. 1839. De functionibus nervorum cerebralium et nervi sympathici. Bernae et Sangalli Helvetiorum, 161 pp. PHYSIOLOGY OF OLFACTION 91 VALENTIN, G. 1848, Lehrbuch der Physiologie des Menchen, Bd. 2, Abt. 2, 731 pp. Van Dam, C. 1917a. Adsorption de matiéres odorantes. Arch. néerl. Physiol., tome 1, pp. 666-677. Van Dam, C. 1917b. Un nouvel olfactométre. Arch. néerl. Physiol., tome 1, pp. 660-665. VascHIpE, N. 1901. L’expérience de Weber et Volfaction en milieu li- quide. Compt. rend. Soc. Biol., Paris, tome 53, pp. 165-167. VeERESS, E. 1903. Ueber die Reizung des Riechorgans durch directe Ein- wirkung riechende Flussigkeiten. Arch. ges. Physiol., Bd. 95, pp. 368-408. Wenger, E. H. 1847. Ueber den Einfluss der Erwiirmung und Erkialtung der Nerven auf ihr Leitungsvermégen. Arch. Anat. Physiol., 1847, pp. 342-356. Wins tow, C.-E. A. and D, GREENBERG, 1918. The Effect of the Respiration of Putrid Gases upon the Growth of Guinea Pigs. Proc. Soc., Exp. Biol, Med., vol. 15, pp. 123-124. Woopvrow, H. and B. Karpman. 1917. A New Olfactometric Technique and some Results. Jour. Exp. Psych., vol. 2, pp. 431-447. ZWAARDEMAKER, H. 1917. Le :phénoméne de la charge des brouillards de substances odorantes. Arch. néerl. Physiol., tome 1, pp. 347-373. ZWAARDEMAKER, H. 1918a. Aequiradio-activity. Amer. Jour. Physiol., vol. 45, pp. 147-156. ZWAARDEMAKER, H. 1918b. Le sens de l’adsorption des substances vola- tiles. Acta Otolaryngologica, tome 1, pp. 54-73. ZWAARDEMAKER, H. 1920. On Physiological Radio-activity. Jour, Physiol., vol. 53, pp. 273-289. CHAPTER IV. VOMERO-NASAL ORGAN OR ORGAN OF JACOBSON. Contents.—l. Vomero-nasal Organ in Man. 2. Com- parative Anatony. 3. Histology. 4. Adjacent Parts. 5. Function. 6. Bibliography. Vomero-nasaL Organ in Man. In early infancy all human beings show traces of a pair of organs that are without doubt homologues of the vomero-nasal organs of the lower vertebrates. Each vomero-nasal organ in the new-born babe is a short tubular structure from a half to two and a half millimeters long and lodged in the lower anterior portion of the nasal septum. The organ opens into the nasal cavity by a minute pore on the free sur- face of the septum not far from its ventral border and only a short distance inward from the external naris. The tubular part of the organ extends posteriorly from this minute pore and ends blindly at a point somewhat higher than the level of the pore itself. In early human embryos the pore of the vomero-nasal organ can be easily identified on the median face of the nasal chamber just within the anterior naris (Fig. 19). In adults the organ, though commonly present, may disap- pear completely. When present it occurs near the ven- tral margin of the nasal septum (Fig. 20). Kolliker (1877) states that it may vary in length from two to seven millimeters and Anton (1895) gives as the extremes 2.2 millimeters and 8.4 millimeters. As seen in trans- verse section it has the appearance of a tube flattened in the plane of the nasal septum. Its lateral wall is eov- 92 VOMERO-NASAL ORGAN 93 ered with an epithelium that resembles histologically the respiratory epithelium of the nasal cavity. This lateral epithelium may even be ciliated. The median wall is cov- ered with an epithelium much like the olfactory epithelium of the nose except that differentiated olfactory cells are apparently not present. The cavity of the organ is sometimes obliterated by excessive epithelial growth and calcareous con- cretions may occur in its walls. As it appears to be without nervous con-, nections, the vomero-nasal organ in man is probably entirely rudimentary. 2. Comparative Anatomy. A vo- mero-nasal organ has been recog- nized for some time past in all classes of vertebrates except the fishes, but, according to Gawrilenko (1910), this group too must be admitted to have at least the foreshadowings of such an Fre. 19. —Lateral view organ. Even in such primitive forms embryo showing fhe pore as the sharks and rays each olfactory organ, ‘After His, 188 sac is divided into two compartments with separate innervation and these two compartments may be supposed to correspond one to the vomero-nasal organ and the other to the olfactory organ proper. This double character of the olfactory apparatus is also seen in other fishes. Thus in the development of the olfactory sac of the salmon Gawrilenko has shown that this organ includes two sensory thickenings or placodes, a median one and a lateral one. These two placodes can be traced into the adult where they are said to give rise to a median olfactory area and a lateral area. The median 94 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES area is believed to correspond to the vomero-nasal organ of the higher vertebrates and the lateral area to the true olfactory receptor of these forms. In some amphibians the distinction between a lateral and a median organ is much more evident than in fishes (Fig. 21). The lateral organ is the one that conducts the aaa sit aap ieee tae me ota 1s a newly established air current from the external naris to the choana and hence corresponds to the olfactory organ proper. The median cavity is less involved in this cur- rent and is believed to represent the vomero-nasal organ. In certain sauropsida such as the alligators and tur- tles the vomero-nasal organ has been said to be at best only poorly developed, though so far as turtles are con- cerned this opinion is not shared by one of the most recent workers, McCotter (1917). In birds the organ is claimed to be entirely absent, but in lizards and in snakes it is highly differentiated (Fig. 22). Here the olfactory apparatus consists of a well-developed organ VOMERO-NASAL ORGAN 95 of smell located in the respiratory passage and an entirely independent vomero-nasal organ. The latter, in the form of a blind sae, opens into the cavity of the mouth. This peculiarity is probably dependent upon the growth of the hard palate in reptiles whereby a new adjustment between the nasal cavity and the mouth is brought about. In mammals the vomero-nasal organ also shows much diversity. It is apparently best developed in the lower Fig." 21.—Transverse section of the snout of a young frog snowing the partial division of the nasal cavity into a lateral or olfactory portion (0) and a median or vomero-nasal portion (v). forms, such as the Australian duckbill Ornithorhynchus, and it is rudimentary in such groups as the primates including man. In general it has the form of a blind sac that opens usually by means of the naso-palatine duct (Stenson’s duct) into the mouth, a relation that is prob- ably reminiscent of its original connection with the primitive choana of which the naso-palatine duct may be regarded as a trace. Less commonly it opens directly by its own duct into the nasal cavity. This condition obtains in certain rodents such as the rabbit, guinea pig, rat, and mouse, and in certain primates including man. 96 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES In all these higher vertebrates the olfactory organ proper corresponds to the lateral component of the pair of organs in the lower forms and the vomero-nasal organ to the median member of this group (Fig. 23). 3. Histology. The vomero-nasal organ of the dog and the cat, as described by Read (1908), is a tubular organ whose transverse section is circular in out- line near its opening and crescentic or kidney- shaped throughout its ereater extent. Its median wall may be two to three times as thick as its lateral wall. This thickened por- tion, which has been observed by numerous workers in a variety of mammals, is similar in Fra. 22.—Transverse section of the head Cellular composition to the of a snake embryo (Agkistrodon) showing . a the ‘nasal canal proper (n) and the large olfactory epithelium of roof of the mouth. Preparation by Mr, the nose and is in strong contrast with the lateral thin wall which resembles respiratory nasal epithelium. Read has shown that the vomero-nasal organ of the cat and the dog is like the olfactory region of the nose in that it receives nerve fibers from two sources, the olfactory nerve and the trigeminal nerve. As early as 1892 von Brunn showed that the sense cells of the vomero-nasal organ of the sheep were con- nected with nerve fibers in exactly the way they were in the olfactory region proper and he assumed, probably VOMERO-NASAL ORGAN 97 with correctness, that these fibers belonged to the olfac- tory nerve (Fig. 24). These observations were confirmed by all subsequent workers including von Lenhossék (1892) in the rabbit, Retzius (1894) in the snake, Ramon y Cajal (1895) in the rat, and Read (1908) in the kitten. Retzius showed that in the snake those nerve-fibers that were connected with the sense cells in the vomero- nasal organ mingled with the bundle of fibers from the olfactory region of : ‘the nose and thus con- firmed von Brunn’s suspicion that vo- mero-nasal fibers were true olfactory fibers. Von Lenhossék pointed out that at least in the rabbit the sense cells were not limited to the thick- ‘ened face of the vo- sich Coat cae ae yom : nasal organ (v), its,cartilage (c), and the nasal mero-nasal organ, as ___eavity (a). had been maintained heretofore, but were found upon the opposite thin face of the organ as well This observation was confirmed on the rat a few years later by Ramon y Cajal. Hairlike terminations on the vomero-nasal sense cells, such as those that had been found in the olfactory cells, were sought for by a number of investigators but only traces of these structures could be found (von Brunn, Retzius, Read), probably because of the ease with which they are destroyed in the preparation of the tissue. Von Lenhossék in 1892 not only confirmed von vi 98 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES Brunn’s observation that the vomero-nasal sense cells were directly connected with nerve fibers, but he also pointed out that in the Jacobson organ of the foetal rab- bit free-nerve terminations occurred. These free termi- nals in some instances reached the receptive surface of the epithelium where they ended in slight knobs. Similar endings were recorded for the rat by Ramén y Cajal (1895). Von Lenhossék was unable to decide definitely whether these terminals belonged to the olfac- tory or to the trigeminal nerve. Nor is this question definitely settled now, though, judging vomere‘nesal creas of the sheep from the conditions met with shied by the Gates. Sliea Mies in the olfactory organ of von Brunn, 1892, Plate 30, Fig. 12. < = is the nose, it is highly prob- able, as Read concludes, that they belong to the trigem- inal nerve. Admitting this to be the case, the innervation of the vomero-nasal organ would agree in all particulars with that of the olfactory organ proper. It is quite clear from the studies of Brookover (1917) on the ner- vus terminalis as well as from those of Larsell (1918) that the relations of this nerve to the vomero-nasal organ are merely incidental; the terminal nerve is in no sense especially connected with the organ of Jacobson. 4. Adjacent Parts. In many of the higher verte- brates the vomero-nasal organ is contained within a more or less complete capsule of cartilage, the Jacobson car- tilage (See Fig. 23). In the cat this capsule, according to Read, is complete anteriorly and incomplete posteri- orly; in the dog it is incomplete throughout its whole VOMERO-NASAL ORGAN 99 length. The vomero-nasal organ of these forms has com- monly associated with it a considerable amount of caver- nous tissue. This tissue, which was long ago identified in nasal organs by Klein (1881a, 1881b), is so disposed that in connection with the surrounding cartillage and other parts, it may serve as a means of changing in no small degree the volume of the organ. 5. Function. Concerning the function of the vomero-~ nasal organ almost nothing is known. Von Mihalkovies (1898) found that after burning out the naso-palatine duct and more or less of the vomero-nasal organ in the cat and in the rabbit, the appropriation of food by these animals was not interfered with, but it is hardly to be expected that so crude an experiment as this would yield significant results. Kolliker emphasized the fact that, at least in mammals, the connection between the vomero-nasal organ and the exterior is so narrow and indirect that it seems almost impossible that there should be any transfer of material from the exterior to the inte- rior of the organ as, for instance, is implied in olfaction. He, therefore, suggested that the vomero-nasal organ was concerned with testing the animal’s own juices as rep- resented by the secretions from this organ. But the vomero-nasal organ, particularly in mammals, is inti- mately associated with much cavernous tissue whose change in volume may be concerned with its filling and emptying. Thus it is quite possible that oral or nasal juices may be sucked into the vomero-nasal organ and discharged from it as has recently been maintained by Broman (1918). Henning (1916) has suggested that the organ is concerned with water olfaction as contrasted with air olfaction, but according to an unpublished obser- 100 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES vation of Mr. H. E. Hamlin air is often found in the vomero-nasal organs of freshly killed mammals, and this observation when taken in connection with the work of Broman supports the hypothesis already advanced by many investigators (P. and F. Sarasin, 1890; Seydel, 1895; Gaupp, 1900) that these organs are subsidiary olfactory receptors, an opinion that, while it lacks com- plete experimental proof, is abundantly supported by the finer structure of the parts concerned. 6. BIBLIOGRAPIIY. Anton, W. 1895. Beitrige zur Kenntnis des Jacobson’schen Organes bei Erwachsenen. Zeitschr. Heilk., Bd. 16, pp. 355-372. Broman, I. 1918. Om Jacobsonska Organets konstruktion om funktion. Lunds Univ. Arsskrift, N. F., Avd. 2, vol. 14, No. 4, 40 pp. Brookover, C. 1917. The Peripheral Distribution of the Nervus termin- alis in an infant. Jour. Comp. Neurol., vol. 28, pp. 349-360. Von Bruny, A. 1892. Die Endigung der Olfactoriusfasern im Jacob- son’schen Organe des Schafes. Arch mik. Anat., Bd. 39, pp. 651-652. Gaupp, E. 1900. Das Chondrocranium von Lacerta agilis. Anat. Hefte, Arb., Bd. 15, pp. 433-595. GAWRILENKO, A. 1910. Die Entwickelung des Geruchsorgan bei Salmo salar. Anat. Anz., Bd. 36, pp. 411-427. His, W. 1885. Anatomie menschlicher Embryonen. III Zur Geschichte der Organe. Leipzig, 260 pp. Hennine, H. 1916. Der Geruch. Leipzig, 533 pp. Katuius, E. 1905. Geruchsorgan. Bardeleben, Handb. Anat. Menschen, Bd. 5, Abt. 1, Teil 2, pp. 115-242. Kuen, E. 188la. Contribution to the Minute Anatomy of the Nasal Mucous Membrane. Quart. Jour, Mic. Sci., vol. 21, pp. 98-113. Kern, E. 1881b. A Further Contribution to the Minute Anatomy of the Organ of Jacobson in the Guinea-pig. Quart. Jour. Mic. Sci., vol. 21, pp. 219-230. Kouiixer, A. 1877. Ueber des Jacobsonsche Organ des Menschen. Grat. Schrift. Rinecker. Von LENHossEK, M. 1892. Die Nervenurspriinge und -Endigungen im Jacobson’schen Organ des Kaninchens. Anat. Anv., Bd. 7, pp. 628-635. LarseELL, O. 1918.' Studies on the Nervus terminalis: Mammals. Jour. Comp. Neurol., vol. 30, pp. 1-68. VOMERO-NASAL ORGAN 101 McCorter, R. E. 1917. The Vomero-nasal apparatus in Chrysemys pune- tata and Rana catesbiana. Anat. Rec., vol. 13, pp. 51-67. Von MiHaLxovics, V. 1898. Nasenhéhle und Jacobsonches Organ. Anat. Hefte. Arb., Bd. 11, pp. 1-107. Ramon y Cagax, S. 1895. Les nouvelles Idées sur la Structure du Systéme Nerveux. Paris, '201 pp. Reap, E. A. 1908. A Contribution to the Knowledge of the Olfactory Apparatus in the Dog, Cat, and Man. Amer. Jour. Anat., vol, 8, pp. 17-47. Rerzius, G. 1894. Die Riechzellen der Ophidier in der Riechschleim- haut und im Jacobson’schen Organ. Biol. Unters. N. F., Bd. 6, pp. 48-51. Sarasin, P. und F. Sarasin. 1890. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte und Anatomie der ceylonesischen Blindwiihle Ichthyophis glutinosus L. Ergeb. naturw, Forsch. Ceylon, Bd. 2, pp. 1-263. SEYDEL, O. 1895. Ueber die Nasenhthle und das Jacobsonsche Organ Der Amphibien. Morph. Jahrb., Bd. 23, pp. 453-543. Symineton, J. 1891. On the Nose, the Organ of Jacobson, and the Dumb-bell shaped Bone in Ornithorhynchus. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 1891, pp. 575-584, ZUCKERKANDL, E. 1910. Das Jacobsonsche Organ. Ergeb. Anat. Ent- wick., Bd. 18, pp. 801-843. CHAPTER V. THE COMMON CHEMICAL SENSE. Contents.—1. Common Chemical Sense in Man. 2. In Lower Vertebrates. 3. Nerve Terminals. 4. Relation to Other Senses. 5. Bibliography. 1. Common Chemical Sense in Man. It was long ago made clear by Frohlich that on the nasal surfaces of man there were two systems of receptors that could be stimulated by gaseous or vaporous materials: olfac- tory cells representing the olfactory nerve, whose stim- uli, delicate perfumes and odors, call forth few observable responses, and free-nerve terminals probably represent- ing the trigeminal nerve, whose stimuli, irritants for the most part, are usually followed by vigorous reactions such as sneezing. This distinction has been generally accepted among physiologists, but it has not been so clearly seen that the receptors for irritants are found in other parts of the body than the nose and that they rep- resent a fairly well defined category of sense organs which, if not so sharply marked off as those of taste and of smell, are fairly comparable in distinctness with the receptors for heat, cold, or pain. The extent of their occurrence is easily recognized. Thus the vapor of ammonia not only irritates the nose, but also the eye, causing watering, as well as the mouth and the upper respiratory region whence arise impulses that lead to coughing and choking. Irritants of this kind also stim- ulate the anus and the genital apertures and in fact any 102 THE COMMON CHEMICAL SENSE 103 part of the body where a mucous surface is in contact more or less with the exterior. In man, then, the recep- tors for irritants have a much wider distribution over the body than the olfactory receptors have in that they are found on almost every exposed or partly exposed mucous surface. 2. In Lower Vertebrates. In other mammals than man, in birds, and in reptiles the receptors for irritating substances are probably distributed in much the same way as in man and are confined to the exposed or semi- exposed mucous surfaces. In the amphibians and the fishes, however, this system of receptors shows a pro- digious expansion in that in these animals it is found covering their whole exteriors. The well known experi- ment of stimulating the frog’s foot with ‘solutions of acids and other such substances is based upon this peculi- arity and the sensitiveness of the skin of this and other amphibians and of fishes as worked out by Nagel (1894), Parker (1908a, 1908b, 1912), Sheldon (1909), Cole (1910), Crozier (1915, 1916), and others show quite clearly that sensitiveness to solutions of chemicals is a common property of the skin in all these aquatic vertebrates. As early as 1894 Nagel discovered that the integument of the dogfish Scyllium was extremely sensitive to a great variety of chemical substances. He likewise found that the skin of the goosefish Lophius and of the lancetfish Amphi- oxus were also generally open to chemical stimulation. Nagel’s observations on Amphioxus were confirmed in 1908 when it was shown that the skin of this fish was sensitive to solutions of acids, alkalis, alcohol, ether, chloroform, turpentine, oil of bergamot and oil of rose- mary but not to solutions of sugar. It was also demon- 104 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES strated that the skin of the catfish Amiurus was sensitive to sour, saline, and alkaline solutions, a condition that was subsequently found to be true for the young of the lamprey eel Ammocoetes Parker (1908b, 1912). In 1909 Sheldon published an account of the chemical stimulation of the skin of the dogfish Mustelus, the most extensive study of this kind thus far made. Sheldon found that the whole outer surface of this fish was very sensitive to acids and alkalis, less so to salts and bitter substances and not at all to sugar solutions, a condition that in gen- eral confirmed the results of earlier workers. Crozier (1915) studied the mutual relations of salts of sodium, potassium, and calcium as applied to the frog’s skin and was able to demonstrate ionic antagonism which led him to conclude that in normal stimulation the surface of the receptor must be penetrated by the stimulant. These observations warrant the general conclusion that the outer surfaces of most fishes and amphibians are open to stimulation by chemical substances of a mildly irritating kind. It is probable that this capacity has been retained by the air-inhabiting vertebrates in only a very circumscribed and local way, namely on those exposed or partly exposed mucous surfaces that reproduce in their delicacy and moistness the characteristics of the general outer surface of aquatic forms. From this standpoint the restriction of the chemical sensibility of the air-inhabiting vertebrates is the result of the drying of their skins in consequence of an ancestral migration from an environment of water to one of air. 3. Nerve Terminals. The form of nerve terminal that is concerned with the reception of chemical irritants in the skin of vertebrates is well indicated in the catfish THE COMMON CHEMICAL SENSE 105 Amiurus. If a bait in the form of a piece of meat or the like is held close to the flank of one of these fishes, the animal is very likely to turn suddenly and snap it up. This is not a surprising response, for the sides of these ani- mals are well provided with taste-buds. They are also supplied with lateral-line organs. Both these sets of receptors may be eliminated by cutting on the one hand, the branch of the facial nerve that is supplied to the taste- buds of the side of the body and, on the other, the lateral- line nerve that is distributed to the lateral-line organs of the same region. After the fish has recovered from such an operation, it will no longer respond to a bait held near its flank, but the skin of this region is still per- fectly open to stimulation by sour, saline and alkaline solutions. As the only receptors left after the operation just described are the free-nerve terminals of the spinal nerves, these terminals must be the receptors for chem- ical irritants. This conclusion is in accord with the fact that this type of ending is the only one that occurs in many portions of the skin of the dogfish, of the foot of the frog, and of the partly exposed mucous surfaces of the higher vertebrates such as those of the mouth and the nose. Moreover when these endings are rendered inoperative by cutting their nerve trunks, as Sheldon did on the dogfish and as has often been done on the nasal cavities of mammals, irritating substances are no longer effective. Free-nerve endings of spinal or cranial nerves are, therefore, quite certainly the type of nerve-terminal concerned with the reception of chemical irritants. 4. Relation to Other Senses. In discussing the relation of the receptors for chemical irritants to other sense organs some of the earlier workers suggested a compari- 106 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES son of these receptors with those for taste Parker (1908a) ; Herrick (1908). More recently Coghill (1914) has declared that since tactile and chemical irritability develop simultaneously in certain amphibian larve, chemical irritability is in reality tactile in nature. It must also be perfectly evident that the receptors under consideration have striking resemblances to those con- cerned with pain. The fact that organs of taste always involve special- ized end-organs, such as taste-buds, whereas receptive surfaces for chemical irritants may contain only free- nerve endings, shows that the relation of these two classes of receptors is at best only distant. This con- clusion is supported by an observation by Parker and Stabler (1913) that the minimum concentration of ethyl aleohol necessary for the stimulation of the irritant receptors in man, 5 to 10 molar, is decidedly stronger than that which will stimulate the human gustatory organs, 3 molar. The relation of the receptors for irritants to those for touch and for pain seems to be clearly indicated in the results of experiments in which exhaustion and nar- cotics have been used. If the tail of an amphioxus is subjected to about twenty applications of weak nitric acid, 0.025 molar, in fairly rapid succession, the fish will cease to respond to this kind of stimulus. After the exhaustion of the mechanism for this type of reception, the tail of the fish will be found fully sensitive to the touch of a camel’s hair brush. If, now, the tail of a fresh individual is vigorously stroked some thirty times in succession, the fish will cease to respond to this form of mechanical stimulation but it will still be found very THE COMMON CHEMICAL SENSE 107 sensitive in the exhausted part of the skin to weak acid. Thus mechanical stimulation and chemical stimulation seem to apply to different sets of terminals and the exhaustion of one set does not involve that of the other. On treating a portion of the surface of a dogfish with 2 per cent cocaine, Sheldon found that tactile stimulation ceased in from ten to twenty minutes whereas chemical stimulation was effective for a somewhat longer period. By continuing the treatment with cocaine receptivity for chemical irritants was also eventually abolished. In a similar way Cole (1910) found that if the hind foot of a spinal frog was treated with 1 per cent cocaine till the animal no longer responded to pricking or scratching with a needle or to pinching with forceps, it would never- theless respond vigorously to a salt solution. These results were confirmed by Crozier in 1916 who used a half per cent solution of cocaine hydrochloride on a frog’s foot. After about 20 minutes’ immersion in this solution, the reaction time of the cocained foot to formic acid 0.05 molar, was about twice that of the normal foot. After about an hour to an hour and a half of this treat- ment the cocained foot no longer reacted to pinching but gave good responses to acid with reaction times of from ten to fifteen seconds, about twice that of the non-cocained foot. These observations show beyond a doubt that the effect of chemical irritants on the naturally moist skin of vertebrates is not to be ascribed to the stimulation of organs of touch or of pain but to some other form of receptor, the terminals of what has been called the com- mon chemical sense. As Crozier has pointed out, there can be no question of the distinctness of the human sensations attributed 108 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES to the common chemical sense as contrasted with our sensations of smell, taste, touch, or pain. The curious feeling that comes from vapors that irritate the eyes, nose, or even the mouth has not the remotest relation to touch, smell, or taste and is only distantly suggestive of pain. Pain, however, is easily separated from the common chemical sense by the use of cocaine, and we are, therefore, entirely justified in concluding that the common chemical sense is a true sense with an indepen- dent set of receptors and a sensation quality entirely its own. In the fishes and amphibians it pervades the whole integument but in the reptiles, birds and mammals it is restricted to the partly exposed mucous membranes of the natural apertures, a restriction that doubtless arose as the vertebrate changed from an aquatic to an air-inhabit- ing form. 5. BIBLIOGRAPHY Brarunine, H. 1904. Zur Kenntniss der Wirkung chemischer Reize. Arch. ges. Physiol., Bd. 102, pp. 163-184. Coeur, G. E. 1914. Correlated Anatomical and Physiological Studies of the Growth of the Nervous System of Amphibia, I. The Afferent System of the trunk of Amblystoma. Jour. Comp. Neurol., vol. 24, pp. 161-233. 1919. II. The Afferent System of the head of Ambly- stoma. Jour. Comp. Neurol., vol. 26, pp. 247-340. Cote, L. W. 1910. Reactions of Frogs to Chlorides of Ammonium, Potas- sium, Sodium, and Lithium. Jour. Comp. Neurol. Psychol., vol. 20, pp. 601-614. Crozier, W. J. 1915. Ionic Antagonism in sensory Stimulation. Amer. Jour. Physiol., vol. 39, pp. 297-302. Crozier, W. J. 1916. Regarding! the Existence of the “Common Chemical Sense” in Vertebrates. Jour. Comp. Neurol., vol. 26, pp. 1-8. Herrick, C. J. 1908. On the phylogenetic Differentiation of the Organs of Smell and Taste. Jour. Comp. Neurol. Psychol, vol. 18, pp. 159-166. Logs, J. 1905. On the Production and Suppression of Muscular Twitch- ings and Hypersensitiveness of the skin by Electrolytes. Studies in Gemeral Physiology, vol. 2, pp. 748-765. THE COMMON CHEMICAL SENSE 109 NaGeEL, W. 1894. Vergleichend physiologische und anatomische Unter- suchungen tiber den Geruchs- und Geschmackssinn und ihre Organe. Bibl. Zool., Heft 18. Parker, G. H. 1908a. The Sense of Taste in Fishes. Sciemce, vol. 27, p. 453. Parker, G. H. 1908b. The Sensory Reactions of Amphioxus. Proc. Amer. Acad. Arts. Sci., vol. 53, pp. 415-455. Parker, G. H. 1912. The Relation of Smell, Taste, and the Common Chemical Sense in Vertebrates. Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, vol. 15, pp. 221-234. Parker, G. H. and E. M. Stasrer. 1913. On Certain Distinctions be- tween Taste and Smell. Amer. Jour. Physiol., vol. 32, pp. 230-240. SuELpon, R. E. 1909. The Reactions of the Dogfish to Chemical Stimuli. Jour. Comp. Neurol. Physchol., vol. 19, pp. 273-311. CHAPTER VI. ANATOMY OF THE GUSTATORY ORGAN. Contents.—1. Distribution of Taste-buds in the Oral Cavity of Man. 2. Comparative Distribution of Taste- buds. 3. General Form of Taste-buds. 4. Cellular Com- position of Taste-buds. 5. Intragemmal and Other Spaces. 6. Innervation of Taste-buds. 7. Gustatory Nerves. 8. Relation of Gustatory Nerve Fibers and Taste-buds. 9. Bibliography. 1. Duistrisution of Taste-buds in the Oral Cavity of Man. In man the organs of taste are located in the mouth. These are the so-called taste-buds discovered independently by Lovén (1867) and by Schwalbe (1867). In the adult human being they have been identified on the dorsal surface of the tongue except the mid-dorsal region, on both the anterior and posterior surfaces of the epiglottis, on the inner surface of the arytenoid process of the larynx, on the soft palate above the uvula, on the anterior pillars of the fauces, and on the posterior wall of the pharynx. All other oral surface in the adult, such as the lips, the gums, the cheeks, the inferior surface of the tongue, the hard palate, the uvula, and the tonsils are devoid of these organs. In young individuals, babes, and human embryos taste-buds are more widely distributed than they are in the adult. According to Tuckerman (1890a, 1890b) and Graberg (1898) taste-buds appear in man at about the beginning of the third month of foetal life. Stahr (1902) found them in human embryos in the middle of the dor- 110 ANATOMY OF THE GUSTATORY ORGAN 111 sum of the tongue and Ponzo (1905) identified them on the palatine tonsils, the hard palate, and the cervical part of the esophagus, regions from which they are absent in the adult. As early as 1875 Hoffmann called attention to the fact that in human embryos and newly born babes taste-buds were commonly found on the free surfaces of the vallate papille, situations from which they disappear in later life. This observation was con- firmed by Tuckerman (1889) as well as by Hermann (1885), who, however, worked upon the rabbit. Thus the gustatory apparatus of man and of other mammals is by no means constant, but suffers reduction from the late embryonic period to the adult state. On the tongue of man the reduction is chiefly in the middle region of the distal two-thirds so that, as Stahr (1902) has pointed out, the center of taste in this organ shifts with growth from a position near the tip of the tongue to one in the neighborhood of the vallate papille. This opinion is in agreement with the observation of Heiderich (1906) that after birth the taste-buds of the vallate papille show almost no change. Wherever taste-buds occur in man, except on the tongue, they are found simply imbedded in the epithe- lium of the mucous membrane of the region concerned. On the tongue, however, they are almost invariably asso- ciated with certain kinds of papille. The human tongue possesses several classes of these structures, which from their forms have been designated as conical, filiform, fungiform, foliate, and vallate. The plush surface of the dorsum of the tongue is produced by innumerable fine conical and filiform papille. These, however, almost never have taste-buds associated with them. The other 112 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES types of papille, the fungiform, foliate, and vallate, very generally carry taste-buds (Fig. 25). The fungiform papille are relatively large knob-like elevations scattered over the dorsum of the tongue. They can be easily seen with the unaided eye and may be readily located and identified. They commonly carry a few taste-buds embed- ded in the epithelium of their free outer sur- faces. In sections of the crowns of these papille parallel to the surface of the tongue three or four or more, rarely six to eight, taste-buds may be identified. In verti- cal section it can be seen that the taste-buds are not indiscriminately scattered over the free surface of the papilla, Fia. 25.—Dorsal view of the human tongue but are perched on the showing foliate papille ({) and vallate papille (v). secondary dermal pa- pille contained within the papilla proper and that they always reach through the full thickness of the epidermis from the dermal core of the secondary papilla to the free outer surface of the primary papilla itself (Fig. 26). This extension through the whole thickness of the epi- dermis seems to be a common characteristic of taste- buds, for it is to be noted in them from fishes to man. It is an easy means of distinguishing them from other bud-like receptors such as the lateral-line organs whose ANATOMY OF THE GUSTATORY ORGAN 113 cells extend only part way through the epithelium in which they are imbedded. The foliate papille lie on either side of the edge of the human tongue and close to its root. They form a series of from three to eight vertical parallel ridges. Each ridge is abundantly supplied with taste-buds which, Fia. 26.—Vertical section of a fungiform papilla showing two taste-buds. however, do not occur on its free outer surface but on its sides. Here the buds open into the ditch between the ridge on which they are located and the next one. In sections transverse to the axis of the ridge the numbers of taste-buds seen on the two sides of a given ditch may vary from three to twenty. In the rabbit the foliate pa- pille are especially well developed and are abundantly supplied with taste-buds. These have been very fully studied recently by Heidenhain (1914) who has shown that the buds are arranged in more or less vertical rows on each papillar fold and that they probably increase in numbers by a process of fission. The vallate papilla, which in man are usually six to twelve in number, form on the posterior part of the 8 114 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES tongue a V-shaped row whose angle points toward the esophagus (See Fig. 25). Each papilla is a low circu- lar elevation surrounded by a relatively deep, narrow ditch. The taste-buds are located on the walls of this ditch and chiefly on that wall which forms part of the papilla. In a vertical section through a vallate papilla, it is usual to see on the side of the ditch formed by the Fia. 27.—Vertical section of a vallate papilla showing taste-buds. papilla from ten to a dozen taste-buds and on the side away from that structure four to six such bodies (Fig. 27). However, as Schwalbe (1868) long ago pointed out, much individual variation occurs and it is, therefore, very difficult even to estimate with any degree of accuracy the total number of taste-buds on a single papilla. W. Krause (1876) believed the number for a single papilla in man to be as high as 2500, but von Wyss (1870) placed it much lower, namely, at about 400. Even these figures seemed too high to Graberg (1899) who gave the maximum at 100 to 150 and the minimum at 40 to 50. Heiderich (1906) made a close count on 92 papille from human beings ranging in age from the first to the twen- tieth year and found the extreme numbers of buds to a ANATOMY OF THE GUSTATORY ORGAN 115 papilla to be 508 and 33 with an average not far from 250. 2. Comparative Distribution ‘of Taste-buds. Taste- buds, like the olfactory receptors, require a moist sur- face. It is, therefore, not surprising to find that in all air-inhabiting vertebrates they are limited to the oral cavity. Their distribution in mammals has been very fully studied by Tuckerman (1892), Miinch (1896), and Haller (1909). Taste-buds also appear to be limited to the oral region in amphibians notwithstanding the fact that many of these animals possess a permanently moist skin. In fishes they were apparently first seen by Leydig in 1851 and were subsequently described by Schulze (1863). In these forms they are not restricted to the oral region. According to Johnston (1906) they are present on the heads of cyclostomes as well as on those of ganoids where they were studied by Dogiel (1897). Herrick (1918) states that in some bony fishes, such as the catfishes, the carps, and the suckers they are to be found over the entire outer surface of the body and this investigator (1903) has further shown that in the catfish Amiurus the taste-buds on the flank of the fish are as significant in the detection of bait as are those about the mouth (Fig. 28). 3. General Form of Taste-buds. Taste-buds vary in form from that of a flask to that of a spindle. Commonly they are single bud-shaped bodies opening to the exte- rior by a small pore (Fig. 29). Compound buds in which the body of the bud appears double and two pores are present have long been known and Heidenhain (1914) has recently shown that this condition may reach an extreme degree of complexity in the foliate papille of the rabbit 116 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES where compound buds with as many as six pores have been identified. The frequency with which types of buds with different numbers of pores occur may be gathered from the enumeration by Heidenhain who found that in 509 taste-buds from the foliate papille of the rabbit 368 had one pore, 100 two pores, 29 three pores, 7 four TS Fic. 28.—Lateral view of the catfish, Amiurus melas, showing in black the gustatory branches of the facial nerve. After Herrick, 1903, Fig. 3. pores, 1 five pores, and 4 six pores. In the compound buds the pores usually form a more or less linear series and as each pore represents a single element in the com- plex the whole gives the impression of a row of fused buds (Fig. 30.) These compound buds are believed to result from a process of imperfect division. Some taste-buds open directly on the oral surface where they are located; others are marked by a pore, the outer taste-pore, which leads into a short canal and this in turn ends at the inner taste-pore formed by the distal end of the bud itself. Won Ebner (1897) noted that in some instances the canal expanded into a small chamber or ampulla over the tip of the bud and, though Graberg (1899) could not confirm this statement for man, the condition has been observed anew by Kallius (1905) in ANATOMY OF THE GUSTATORY ORGAN 117 human material and by Heidenhain (1914) in the rabbit. d. Cellular Composition of Taste-buds. The cells composing the taste-buds are so arranged as to give each bud somewhat the appearance of a flower bud or of a leaf bud not yet unfolded. As has been stated already, these end-organs were described in the skin of fishes as early as 1851 by Leydig and were subsequently simultaneously and independently discovered in the mouths of the higher vertebrates ‘by Lovén (1867) and by Schwalbe (1867). The older workers usually distinguished in the taste- ‘buds two classes of cells, taste- cells, which were supposed to be Fic. 29.—A simple taste-bud chiefly central in position, and Faobit” Alter Hetdenbain, 1918 supporting cells mainly on the vet exterior of the bud. Each taste-cell is an attenuated delicate structure whose elongate nucleus forms a slight enlargement near the middle of the cell-body (See Fig. 31a). Distal to it narrows to a delicate process, the taste hair. This hair either projects out of the pore into the exterior or into the canal when that is present. Proximal to the nucleus the taste-cell extends into the deeper part of the bud there to terminate usually in a small rounded knob. The number of taste-cells in a bud varies from two or three to as many as the contained supporting cells, per- haps ten or more. Beside the taste-cells proper Schwalbe (1867) de- seribed what he believed to be a second form of receptive 118 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES cell to which he gave the name of ‘‘Stabzelle”’ or rod cell. This type of cell was said to differ from the ordinary taste cell in that it was without a taste hair. It has not been identified with certainty by subsequent investigators. The supporting cells of the taste-buds have been the occasion of much difference of opinion. The older workers believed that these cells were limited to the exte- rior of the buds, but Merkel (1880) showed that they also occurred in the interior and Ranvier (1888) . definitely described both inner and outer Fic, 30.—A compound]?taste. Supporting cells. Hermann rabbit, After Heidenbsin 1914, Plate (1889) concluded that these 23, Fig. 27. c two classes of supporting cells differed not only in position but also in structure. The outer cells, which he called pier cells (Pfeilerzellen), were relatively large pyramidal elements whose nuclei were proximal in location and whose distal ends terminated in a zone marked with fine vertical stripings. For the inner supporting cells Hermann used Schwalbe’s term of rod cells (Stabzellen) without, how- ever, wishing thereby to imply that they were of a sensory nature. They were said to differ from the pier cells in that they were devoid of the peripheral striped zone. Hermann also described basal supporting cells which to the number of two to four were found in the proximal part of the taste-buds. Von Lenhossék (1893b) doubted the existence of basal cells and described four not very sharply separate types of supporting cells. Graberg (1899) reidentified in human material the basal cells dis- ANATOMY OF THE GUSTATORY ORGAN 119 covered by Hermann. The other supporting cells were described by this author as either central or peripheral and were to be distinguished from each other rather by location than by differences of structure. The indefiniteness and uncertainty that surrounded the question of the classes of supporting cells in taste- buds has been dissipated in large part by the declaration of Kolmer (1910) that between the taste-cells on one hand and the so-called supporting cells on the other there are all possible transitions and that it is, therefore, a mistake to attempt to draw distinctions not only between various kinds of supporting cells but between supporting cells and taste-cells. Kolmer believed that all the elon- gated cells in taste-buds are really taste-cells and that their differences are due to the stage of growth at which they are for the moment. This opinion, which is sup- ported by what is known of the innervation of the taste- buds, has gained the acceptance of the more important recent workers in this field, such as Retzius (1912) and Heidenhain (1914). If true, it shows the taste-bud to be a much more unified structure than has heretofore been supposed and it does away at once with the confusion over the classes of cells that were believed to enter into its composition. The basal cells apparently do not fall into this general category of more or less differentiated receptor cells, but, according to Heidenhain at least, they are elements that only under certain conditions are regularly present and are concerned with the division of the buds. The epidermal cells immediately next the taste-bud are often flattened against this structure and conform more or less to its outline. These cells have been called 120 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES by Graberg (1899) extrabulbar cells and though they are not to be classed as part of the bulb proper they are nevertheless sufficiently related to that structure to be appropriately mentioned in this connection. As Hermann (1889) long ago pointed out, the cells of the taste-buds are probably undergoing continual change. Old cells are degenerating and disappearing and new ones are forming to take the places of those that have broken down. The degenerating process is indicated by the presence in the taste-buds of cells in all stages of growth and of considerable numbers of leucocytes, as pointed out by Ranvier (1888), von Lenhossék (1893b), and others. The regenerative process is shown in the occasional occurrence of mitotic figures in the base of the bud thus giving evidence of cell division in that region Hermann (1889). 5. Intragemmal and other Spaces. Graberg (1899) has ealled attention to the fact that taste-buds are not solid structures but that their cells are separated one from another by considerable intervening space, and that much free space occurs in the tissue immediately around the buds. This intra-, peri-, and subgemmal space is be- lieved by Graberg not to be an artifact, for it can be identified by almost all methods of preparation. Accord- ing to this investigator these various spaces communicate with one another and connect with the exterior through the taste pore. They may be the means of irrigating and thereby cleaning the taste-bud, for it is possible that fluid may flow slowly through them from the interior to the exterior. 6. Innervation of Taste-buds. Among the older in- vestigators the innervation of the taste-buds was a ques- ANATOMY OF THE GUSTATORY ORGAN 121 tion of much uncertainty. Some claimed that the gustatory nerve-fibers connected directly with the cells of the taste-buds; others that they did not so connect. The first to employ special neurological methods for the solution of this question were Fusari and Panasci (1890). These workers claimed that by means of Golgi prep- a 6 Fic. 31.—Golgi preparations of the taste-buds of the rabbit, a showing cells (after wen pote 1893a, Fig. 1a) and b showing nerve-terminations (after Retzius, 1892a, late ig. 4 arations it could be shown that the gustatory cells were directly connected with nerve-fibers. Two years later Retzius (1892a) published an account of the innervation of the taste-buds of mammals and of amphibians in which he showed in preparations stained by methylenblue as well as by the Golgi process that the nerve-fibers were not directly connected with the taste-cells but ended in close proximity to them (Fig. 31). These results were confirmedin 1893 by von Lenhossék, Arnstein, and Jacques as well as by the subsequent work of Retzius himself (1893) and there seems to be no ground for doubting the correctness of the general conclusion arrived at more or less independently by these four investigators. The anatomical relations shown by these workers are relatively simple. From the subepithelial nerve plexus in the neighborhood of taste-buds fibers pass out- ward into the epidermis. These fibers either form sys- 122 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES tems of branches ending in free terminations around a taste-bud, in which case they are called perigemmal or Fig. 32.—Golgi preparations of the taste-buds of the cat, a, in longitudinal section fihowing nerve terminations, and 6, in transverse section showing intragemmal nerve’ sbers. After Retzius, 1892a, Plate 7, Figs. 1 and 4. peribulbar fibers, or they enter the bud and end freely among its cells being designated then as intragemmal or intrabulbar fibers (Fig. 32). As the figures given by Retzius, Arnstein, and others show, the nerve-fibers in ANATOMY OF THE GUSTATORY ORGAN 123 the buds are as intimately applied to the so-called sup- porting cells as to the taste-cells, showing, as has al- ready been stated, that: the distinction between what has been assumed to be two classes of cells is probably quite erroneous. In addition to intergemmal and perigemmal fibers, which in consequence of their close relations with the taste-buds may be designated as gemmal or bulbar fibers, there are also fibers that pass into the undifferentiated epithelium between the buds and end close to the external surface as free-nerve terminations. These have been called intergemmal fibers, but it is doubtful whether they have anything to do with taste and it is not improb- able that they are concerned with other sensory functions such as the common chemical sense, pain, and the like, in which case a designation implying relations to a taste-bud is in no sense appropriate. Taste-buds such as have already been described have been found in a wide range of vertebrates. They not only occur in mammals, where their relation with the nerve-fibers was first correctly described by Retzius (1892a), but also in fishes as seen by Retzius (1892a, 1893), von Lenhossék (1893a),Dogiel (1897) and others (Fig. 33). It is, therefore, probable that so far as essentials are con- cerned the innervation of the taste-buds of all vertebrates presents a relatively uniform plan. 7. Gustatory Nerves. There are no separate gusta- tory nerves in the vertebrates as there are olfactory nerves or optic nerves. Gustatory fibers occur in several crani- al nerves and it is by means of these that the taste-buds of various regions are provided with those nervous con- nections that have been described in the preceding section. 124 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES In the fishes the nerves chiefly concerned are the vagus, the glossopharyngeal and the facial. The taste-buds of the gill region are supplied by the vagus and the glosso- pharyngeal. Those that are in the mouth proper or are on the exterior of the body are innervated by the facial nerve. Consequently in the catfish (See Fig. 28), in which the whole outer skin is provided with taste-buds, this nerve is enormously developed and sends large branches to the barbels and an exten- sive recurrent branch to the flanks of the body (Herrick, 1903). In mammals, includ- Fic. 33.—Golgi preparations of the taste- . G . Pine ianpe cher (yervonteammel, ee the mmmervaion 1893 a, Fig. 2. of the taste-buds is not upon so simple a plan as in fishes. In these higher vertebrates gustatory fibers may possibly be contained in four of the cranial nerves, the vagus, the glosso- pharyngeal, the facial, and the trigeminal. The distribution of these nerves in the human tongue has been worked out by Zander (1897). Certain, parts of the vagus are distributed to the larynx and to the epiglottis as well as to the most posterior part of the tongue itself and innervate very probably the taste-buds of these re- gions (Fig. 34). The glossopharyngeal supplies the pos- terior third of the tongue including the foliate and vallate papillz, for, as was first shown by von Vintschgau and Honigschmied (1876), when the ninth nerve is cut the taste-buds of these parts soon degenerate and disappear. Although the correctness of this observation was denied ANATOMY OF THE GUSTATORY ORGAN 125 by Baginsky (1894), it has been confirmed by such a number of observers, including Drasch (1887), Ranvier (1888), Sandmeyer (1895), Meyer (1897) and others, that it is now generally accepted. Both the right and the left branches of this nerve innervate the median vallate papilla in mammals and form at the base of this organ, as Vastarini-Cresi (1915) has shown, more or less of a gusta- tory chiasma. The anterior two- thirds of the tongue in man are innervated by the lingual nerve which is made up of a union of the lingual branch of the trigem- inal nerve with the chorda tympani of the facial. It has been an open question whether the gustatory fibers for this part of the tongue belong to the ae trigeminal, to the facial, or human tongue showin the parts innervate Vv e lingual nerve possibly even to the glosso- (horizontal lines), by the glosso pharyngeal nerve (oblique lines), pharyngeal, for all these nerves ana. by tie Sapte Bere mal intercommunicate through a plexus of fine branches near their roots. F. Krause (1895) noted the effect on taste of the complete extirpation of the ganglion of the trigeminal nerve, and found that in some instances taste was entirely obliterated from the appro- priate part of the tongue, but that in others it was only somewhat reduced. These differences do not appear in the later and more conclusive work of Cushing (1903) who found that, when time enough was given, all subjects from whom the ganglion of the trigeminal nerve had been removed, recovered taste completely. He attributed 126 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES the temporary disturbance in taste, a condition that was supposed to be permanent by Krause, to the effect of the degenerating trigeminal fibers on the adjacent gusta- tory fibers, an effect that disappeared when the degenera- tion was complete. Consequently Cushing concluded that the gustatory fibers from the anterior part of the tongue Fia. 35.—Diagram to illustrate the possible paths of the gustatory nerve-fibers from the tongue to the brain in man. The distal part of the tongue (1) is innervated by the lingual nerve (2) whose gustatory fibers pass to the brain by way of the chorda tympani (3), a branch of the facial nerve (VII). The proximal part of the tongue is innervated by the glossopharyngeal nerve (4). The undoubted gustatory paths over the facial nerve (VII) and the glossopharyngeal nerve (IX) are indicated by dotted lines. The commonly assumed paths by way of the trigeminal nerve (V) are shown in heavy black lines with arrows. Modi- fied from Cushing, 1903. are not part of the trigeminal nerve. If this is so, they must belong to the facial or possibly to the glossopharyn- geal nerve (Fig. 35). That they are abundantly present in the chorda tympani of the facial nerve is well known from the fact that direct stimulation of the chorda in the neighborhood of the ear drum is commonly accom- panied by sensations of taste, but whether these gusta- tory fibers on reaching the facial nerve pass into the brain through its root or make their way to the root of the glos- sopharyngeal is not yet definitely settled. It is, therefore, probable that in mammals the trigeminal nerve, though ANATOMY OF THE GUSTATORY ORGAN 127 suspected of including gustatory fibers, is really devoid of them. These fibers at most occur in the facial, glos- sopharyngeal and vagus nerves, but none of these nerves is exclusively gustatory. 8. Relation of Gustatory Nerve-fibers to Taste-buds. It is an interesting and significant fact that on the de- generation of the gustatory nerve-fibers the taste-buds associated with them should disappear. This state of affairs, long ago demonstrated for mammals, has recently been shown by Olmsted (1920a, 1920b) to occur also in fishes. Meyer (1897) showed that thirty hours after cut- ting the glossopharyngeal nerve in the rabbit the taste- buds began to show a change and that by the end of seven days most of them had disappeared. In the catfish Ami- urus, according to Olmsted, the taste-buds on the oral barbels begin to degenerate in a little over ten days after the nerve to these organs has been cut and they com- pletely disappear by the end of the thirteenth day. Ranvier (1888) believed that in mammals the taste-buds were destroyed by wandering cells, but Sandmeyer (1895) and Meyer (1897) held the view that the gustatory cells suffered dedifferentiation and changed into ordinary epi- thelial cells. In Amiurus Olmsted has found strong evidence in favor of the destruction of the cells of the taste-buds by phagocytes thus supporting Ranvier’s original opinion. Olmsted has shown, further, that on the regeneration of a nerve in a denervated Amiurus barbel from which all the taste-buds had disappeared, new buds reappear coincident with the arrival of the nerve. With the de- generation of the nerve and the loss of the taste-buds the barbels lose their receptivity for sapid materials, nor 128 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES does this return till the buds regenerate. Since the taste- buds disintegrate with the loss of the nerve and new ones form only with the regeneration of this structure, it is clear that the bud is dependent upon the nerve. As Olmsted has suggested, it is probable that when a twig of the nerve reaches a given spot in the epidermis, it gives out a substance, hormone-like in character, that excites the epithelial cells of that spot to form a bud much as the embryonic eye cup of the vertebrate excites in the super- imposed ectoderm the formation of alens. In this way at least the intimate dependence of the taste-bud on the re- generating nerve-fiber can be explained and, judging from the account given by Landacre (1907) of the ontoge- ny of these organs, a similar explanation may also apply in development. 9. BrBLiocRAPHY, ARNSTEIN, C, 1893. Die Nervenendigungen in den Schmeckbechern der Siiuger. Arch. mik. Anat., Bd. 41, pp, 195-218. Bacinsky, B. 1894, Ueber das Verhalten von Nervenendorganen nach Durchschneidung der zugehérigen Nerven. Arch. path. Anat. Physiol., kl. Med., Bd. 137, pp. 389-404. CusHine, H. 1903. The Taste Fibers and their Independence of the N. trigeminus, Johns Hopkins Hosp. Bull., vol. 14, pp. 71-78. Docret. 1897. Ueber die Nervenendigungen in den Geschmacks-Endknos- pen der Ganoideen. Arch. mik. Anat., Bd. 49, pp. 769-790. Drascu, 0. 1887. Untersuchungen ueber die Papille folliate et circum- vallate des Kaninchen und Feldhasen. Abh. math.-phys. C3. Séch. Gesell. Wiss., Bd. 14, pp. 229-266. Von Expyer, V. 1897. Ueber die Spitzen, der Geschmacksknospen. Sitzb. Akad. Wiss. Wien, math.-nat. Cl., Bd. 106, (3), pp. 73-83. Fusari, R., et A. Panascr. 1890. Les terminasions des nerfs dans la muqueuse et dans les glandes séreuses de la langue des mammifeéres. Arch, Ital, Biol., tome 14, pp. 240-246, Graperc, J. 1898. Beitriige zur Genese des Geschmacksorgans des Men- schen. Morph. Arb., Bd. 8, pp. 117-134. ANATOMY OF THE GUSTATORY ORGAN 129 GRABERG, J. 1899. Zur Kenntnis des celluliren Baues der Geschmacks- knospen beim Menschen. Anat, Hefte, Ard., Bd. 12, pp, 339-368. Hatter, B. 1909. Die phyletische Entfaltung der Sinnesorgane der Siiug- etierzunge. Arch. mik. Anat., Bd. 74, pp. 368-466. HEIDENHAIN, M. 1914. Ueber die Sinnesfelder und die Geschmacksknos- pen der Papilla foliata des Kaninchens. Arch. mik. Anat., Bd. 85, pp. 365-479. HeEmericyH, F, 1906. Die Zahl und die Dimension der Geschmacksknospen der Papilla vallata des Menschen in den verschiedenen Lebensaltern. Nachr. Gesel. Wiss. Gottingen, math. phys. Cl. 1906, pp. 54-64, HERMANN F. 1885. Beitrag zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Geschmacks- organs beim Kaninchen. Arch. mik. Anat., Bd. 24, pp. 216-229. HERMANN, F. 1889, Studien ueber den feineren Bau des Geschmacksor- gans. Sitzb. math.-nat. Cl. Akad. Wiss. Miinchen, Bd. 18, pp. 277-318. Herrick, C. J, 1903. The Organ and Sense of Taste in Fishes. Bull. United States Fish Comm., vol. 22, pp. 237-272. Herrick, C. J. 1918. Am Introduction to Neurology. Philadelphia and London. 394 pp. HorrmMann, A. 1875, Ueber die Verbreitung der Geschmacksknospen beim Menschen. Arch. path. Anat. Physiol. klin. Med., Bd. 62, pp. 516-530 Jacques, P. 1893. Terminasions nerveuses dans l’organe de la gusta- tion. Bibliog, Anat., tome 1, pp. 200-202. Jounston, J. B. 1906. The Nervous System of Vertebrates. Philadel- phia, 370 pp. Katiius, E. 1905. Geschmacksorgan. Bardeleben, Handb, Anat. Mensch., Bd. 5, Abt. 1, Teil 2, pp. 243-270. Koitmer, W. 1910. Ueber Strukturen im Epithel des Sinnesorgane, Anat. Anz., Bd. 36, pp. 281-299. Krause, F. 1895. Die Physiologie des Trigeminus nach Untersuchungen an Menschen bei denen das Ganglion Gasseri entfernt worden ist. Miinchner med. Wochenschr., Bd. 42, pp. 577-581, 602-604, 628-631. Krause, W, 1876. Allgemeine und microscopische Anatomie. Hannover, 581 pp. Lanpacre, F. L. 1907, On the Place of Origin and Method of Distribution of Taste-buds in Ameiurus melas. Jour. Comp, Neurol., vol. 17, pp. 1-66. Von Lennossfx, M. 1893a. Der feinere Bau und die Nervenendigungen der Geschmacksknospen. Anat. Anz., Bd. 8, pp. 121-127. 9 130 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES Von Lennossf&K, M. 1893b. Die Geschmacksknospen in den blattformigen Papillen des Kaninchenzunge. Verh phys.-med. Gesell. Wiirzburg, N. F. Bd. 27, pp. 191-266. Leypic, F, 1851. Ueber die Haut einiger Siisswasserfische. Zeitschr. wisa. Zool. Bd. 3. pp. 1-12. Lovén, C. 1867. Bidrag till Kannedomen om tungans smakpapiller. Lovén, C. 1868. Beitrige zur Kenntniss vom Bau der Geschmackswiirzchen der Zunge. Arch. mik, Anat., Bd. 4, pp. 96-110. MERKEL, F. 1880. Ueber die Endigungen der sensiblen Nerven in der Haut der Wirbeltiere. Rostock, 214 pp. Meyer, S. 1897, Durchschneidungsversuche am Nervus Glassopharyngeus Arch. mik, Anat. Bd. 48, pp. 143-145. Miuncu, F. 1896. Die Topographie der Papillen der Zunge des Menschen und der Siiugethiere. Morph, Arb., Bd. 6, pp. 605-690. OLMSTED, J. M. D. 1920a. The Nerve as a Formative Influence in the Develop- ment of Taste-buds.. Jour, Comp. Neurol., vol. 31, pp. 465-468. OtmsTED, J. M. D. 1920b. The Results of Cutting the Seventh Cranial Nerve in Amiurus nebulosus (Lesueur), Jour. Exp. Zoél., vol. 31, pp. 369-401. Ponzo, M. 1905. Sur la présence de bourgeons gustatifs dans quelques parties de l’arriére-bouche et dans la partie nasale du pharynx du foetus humain. Arch. Ital. Biol. tome 43, pp. 280-286. Ranvier, L. 1888. Traité technique d’Histologie. Paris, 1109 pp. Rerzrus, G. 1892a. Die Nervenendigungen in dem Geschmacksorgan der Siiugetiere und Amphibien, Biol, Unters., N. F. Bd. 4, pp. 19-32, Retzius, G. 1892b. Die Nervenendigungen in den Endknospen resp. Ner- venhiigeln der Fische und Amphibien. Biol, Unters., N, F., Bd. 4, pp. 33-44. Rerzius, G. 1893, Ueber Geschmacksknospen bei Petromyzon. Biol. Unters., N. F., Bd. 5, pp. 69-70, Rerzius, G. 1912, Zur Kenntniss des Geschmacksorgans beim Kaninchen, Biol. Unters., N. F., Bd. 17, pp. 72-80. SaNDMEYER, W. 1895. Ueber das Verhalten der Geschmacksknospen nach Durchschneidung dea N. glassopharyngeus. Arch. Anat. Physiol., physiol. Abt., 1895, pp. 269-276. ScuHuLze, F. E, 1863. Ueber Die becherférmigen Organe der Fische. Zeitschr. wiss Zool., Bd. 12, pp. 218-222. Scuwa.sE, G. 1867. Das Epithel der Papillae vallatae. Arch. mik. Anat., Bd. 3, pp. 504-508. ScuwaLse, G. 1868. Ueber die Geschmacksorgane der Siiugethiere und des Menschen. Arch. mik. Anat., Bd, 4, pp. 154-187, ANATOMY OF THE GUSTATORY ORGAN 131 Sraur, H. 1902. Ueber die Papillae fungiformes der Kinderzunge und ihre Bedeutung als Geschmacksorgan. Zeitschr. Morph. Anthrop., Bd. 4, pp. 199-260. TUCKERMAN, F. 1889. On the Development of the Taste-organs of Man. Jour, Anat. Physiol., vol. 23, pp. 559-582. TUCKERMAN, F. 1890a,. Further Observations on the Development of the Taste-organs of Man. Jour. Anat. Physiol.. Vol. 24, pp. 130-131. TUCKERMAN, F. 1890b, On the Gustatory Organs of the Mammalia. Proceed. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist., vol. 24, pp. 470-482. TUCKERMAN, F. 1892, Further Observations on the Gustatory Organs of the Mammalia. Jour. Morph., vol. 7, pp. 69-94. VASTARINI-CRESI, G. 1915. Chiasma gustativo (periferico) nella lingua dell’uomo e di alcuni mammiferi. Intern. Monatschr. Anat. Physiol., Bd. 31, pp. 380-410. Von VintTscueau, M. 1880. Beobachtungen ueber die Verinderungen der Schmeckbecher nach Durchschneidung des N. Glossopharyngeus. Arch. ges. Physiol., Bd. 23, pp. 1-13. Von VintscHeau, M. unp J. HoniescuMiEp, 1876. Nervus glossopharyngeus und Schmeckbecker. Arch. ges, Physiol., Bd. 14, pp. 443-448. Von Wyss, H. 1870. Die beckerférmigen Organe der Zunge. Arch. mik. Anat., Bd. 6, pp. 237-260. ZANDER, R. 1897. Ueber des Verbreitungsgebiet Gefiihla-und Geschmacks- nerven in der Zungenschleimhaut. Anat. Anz., Bd. 14, pp. 131-145. CHAPTER VII. PHYSIOLOGY OF GUSTATION. Contents.—1. Location of Taste. 2. Gustatory stimulus. 3. Qualities of Taste. 4. The Sour Taste. 5. The Saline Taste. 6. The Bitter Taste. 7. The Sweet Taste. 8. Inadequate Stimuli. 9. Distribution of Tastes on the Tongue. 10. Action of Drugs on Taste. 11. Substances with two Tastes. 12. Latency of Taste Sensations. 13. Taste Alterations; After-tastes. 14. Gustatory Contrasts. 15. Taste Compensations and Mixtures. 16. The Gusta- tory Senses. 17. Comparative. 18. Bibliography. 1. Location of Taste. Although in man taste is not strictly limited to the mouth, for it spreads into some of the adjacent cavities, it is primarily located in the buccal space and is especially a function of the tongue. When the mouth of a normal adult is explored with solu- tions of sapid substances, many parts such as the lips, the gums, the floor, the lower surface of the tongue, the inner surfaces of the cheeks, and the hard palate are found to be insensitive to taste. Even the uvula which, according to many of the older workers, was regarded as having a gustatory function, has been shown by Kiesow and Hahn (1901) not to be concerned with taste. All these regions are well known to be devoid of taste-buds. Whether the pillars of the fauces and the tonsils have to do with taste is a matter of dispute. Hanig (1901) believed that these parts have a gustatory function, but Kiesow and Hahn (1901) regarded them as usually in- sensitive. The mucous membranes of the following parts 132 PHYSIOLOGY OF GUSTATION 133 are concerned with taste; the beginning of the gullet, the region of the arytenoid cartilages within the larynx, the epiglottis, the soft palate, and particularly the tongue. In all these regions taste-buds have been identified. On the tongue of adult human beings taste is limited to the tip, the lateral margins and the dorsal surface of the root, the large central area on the upper surface of this organ being devoid of taste. In children, as contrasted with adults, the whole upper surface of the tongue in- cluding the central area is said to be sensitive to taste as is also the inner surfaces of the cheeks. 2. Gustatory stimuli. The stimulus for taste is an aqueous solution of a great variety of substances. Mate- rials insolublein water are tasteless, but not all substances that form aqueous solutions have taste. Thus oxygen, hydrogen, and nitrogen, though freely soluble in water, are without taste. Piutti (1886) long ago showed that levo-asparagine is tasteless, although its stereoisomer dextro-asparagine is sweet. Other organic compounds, such as the carbohydrates raffinose and alpha-galaoctite are said to be almost, if not quite, tasteless. When solids or semi-solids are chewed in the mouth, they not only become mixed with the saliva whereby many of their components become dissolved, but they are spread over the surface of the tongue and are thus brought into intimate contact with its taste-buds. In fact it is not improbable that the movement of the tongue fa- cilitates the entrance of these solutions into the pores of the taste-buds. At least solutions placed upon the tongue, particularly near its root, are tasted with greater certainty, when this organ is moved about than when it is held still. 134 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES 3. Qualities of Taste. Tastes, unlike odors, fall into a limited number of well-circumscribed groups, which have received distinctive names such as sour, saline, bit- ter, sweet, and the like. The multitude of flavors and other sensations associated with our food are undoubt- edly mixed in character and include touch, heat, cold, the common chemical sensation, and especially odor. By ap- plying materials in weak solution, at the temperature of the mouth and with the nostrils closed, extraneous sen- sations may be eliminated and there remains a certain irreducible residue, the tastes. Zenneck (1839), Valentin (1848), Duval (1872) and later Sternberg (1898) admit- ted only two classes of tastes, sweet and bitter. Stich (1857), however, long ago showed that sour was a sensa- tion produced by stimulating only a limited part of the buccal surface, and Schiff (1867) made the important observation that a solution of acid too weak to stimulate the general mucous surface would nevertheless call forth a sour sensation when it was applied to the gustatory region. Von Vintschgau (1880) made similar observa- tions concerning the saline taste; solutions of sodium chloride, potassium iodide, and ammonium chloride, if sufficiently weak, will stimulate the organs of taste, but if strong they will stimulate not only these organs but the nerve endings of the general buccal cavity also. In consequence of such observations sour and saline are now universally included with bitter and sweet as true tastes. In addition to these four tastes there are a number of questionable ones such as metallic and alkaline, tastes that were originally accepted by Wundt (1887) among others. The so-called metallic taste is excited by solu- tions of salts of the heavy metals, silver, mercury, and PHYSIOLOGY OF GUSTATION 135 the like (Kahlenberg, 1898). The metallic taste of a 0.0005 molar solution of silver nitrate is very pronounced and is discernible even at the greater dilution, 0.0002. Since the nitrate ions are incapable of exciting taste at such slight concentrations, it follows that stimulation must depend upon the silver ions. In asimilar way mer- cury ions in normal solutions of 0.001 to 0.0005 of mercu- ric chloride have been shown to excite the so-called metallic taste. This taste, however, has been declared to be a complex of other tastes such as sour and sweet, and Herlitzka (1808) has gone so far as to maintain that it is not a true taste but an olfactory phenomenon. The alkaline tastes so-called are excited by the appli- cation to the tongue of dilute solutions of such caustic alkalis as sodium or potassium hydrate. Kahlenberg (1898) has shown that the stimulating material in such mixtures is the hydroxylion which is effective in solutions as weak as 0.0025 molar. In the alkaline taste, as in the metallic taste, the results have been variously explained. Oehrwall (1891) regarded the so-called alkaline taste as a mixture of sensations due to a simultaneous combina- tion of several tastes and touch. Hober and Kiesow (1898) pointed out that weak alkalis produce a sweetish taste, but von Frey (1910) showed that these reagents act on the tongue in such a way as to produce odorous materials that he believed to be the occasion of the so- called alkaline taste. He, therefore, relegated these as- sumed tastes to olfaction. Insipidity, such as is characteristic of distilled water, is probably real tastelessness. Oehrwall (1891) attributed it to the absence of small amounts of carbon dioxide from such waters and this is probably true, for tastelessness 136 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES disappears on the addition of some of this gas to insipid water. Henle (1880) showed that insipidity was char- acteristic of fluids that contained less salt than the saliva. Insipidity is probably a deficiency phenomenon and may be produced by the absence of several classes of sub- stances. Nevertheless it must not be forgotten that a condition of staleness or flatness in water, practically indistinguishable from insipidity, can be produced by introducing into the water very small amounts of caustic alkali whereby hydroxyl ions are liberated (Kiesow, 1894-1896). 4. The Sour Taste. Sour taste has long been asso- ciated with acid substances. In fact it seems very prob- able that the sour taste is excited only by acids, acid salts, or materials that produce acids. All these sub- stances on going into aqueous solution give rise to hydro- gen ions by the dissociation of acid molecules. If the solutions are strong they will also contain a certain number of undissociated acid molecules. It was pointed out by Richards (1898) that, since all such solutions have the sour taste and since the one component that they all have in common is the hydrogen ion, this ion must be the occasion of their common taste. This conclusion was independently arrived at in another way by Kahlenberg (1898). A 0.0025 molar solution of hydrochloric acid has a pronounced sour taste and its dissociation into hydro- gen and chlorine ions is practically complete. A corres- ponding solution of sodium chloride is also about completely dissociated into sodium and chlorine ions but is without taste. It follows, therefore, since there are as many chlorine ions in the salt solution as in the acid solution per unit volume and the salt solution is without PHYSIOLOGY OF GUSTATION 137 taste, that the sour taste of the acid solution cannot be due to its chlorine ions but must be occasioned by its only other constituent, the hydrogen ions. Kahlenberg, there- fore, concluded that these ions are accountable for the sour taste. This view is supported by the fact that the sourness of all acid solutions is the same, for instance, it is impos- sible to distinguish by taste hydrochloric acid from nitric or sulphuric acid. So far as the sensations are concerned all these reagents produce identical results, the one qual- ity of sourness. There has been some tendency to sepa- rate astringency from sourness, but it is generally conceded that astringency is merely sourness near the vanishing point.‘ With hydrochloric and other mineral acids this occurs in molar solutions at about 0.00125 to 0.001 below which the acid solutions cannot be distin- guished from pure water. From this standpoint sour taste might be regarded as due directly to hydrogen ions and the intensity of this taste to depend upon the concentration of such ions. But the question is not so simple as this. Although solu- tions of most mineral acids agree well among themselves so far as sourness and hydrogen ion concentration are concerned, organic acids are not necessarily so related. Most organic acids are much less dissociated in aqueous solution than are inorganic acids and contain, therefore, in normal solution, fewer hydrogen ions per unit volume, than inorganic acids do. Nevertheless Richards (1898) found that tartaric, citric, and especially acetic acids were more sour than would have been expected from the hydro- gen ion concentration of their solutions. According to Richards acetic acid is about as sour as a solution of 138 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES hydrochloric acid one-third as concentrated. Nevertheless the acetic acid is dissociated only about one-fourteenth as much as the hydrochloric. Hence ion for ion the acetic acid solution is the more sour of the two. This result was also arrived at by Kahlenberg (1898) who estimated the sourness of acetic acid at a concentration of 0.005 molar to be about four times what should be expected from its hydrogen ion content. These differences were sub- sequently reaffirmed by Becker and Hertzog (1907). It is by no means easy to explain the excess of sour- ness on the part of acetic and other like acids. Richards has suggested, without putting great stress on the idea, that the additional sourness of acetic acid may be due to the undissociated molecules, which, serving as a reserve, producing additional hydrogen ions as those present are used up in the reaction between the acid solution and the surface of the receptor, an opinion supported by the recent work of Harvey (1920). Crozier (1916, 1918a, 1918b), on the other hand, has pointed out the probability that the question is double, one part having to do with penetration and the other with the production of the sour taste. By taking advantage of natural indica- tors, such as the blue pigment in the integument of Chromodoris, it can be easily shown that acids pene- trate living cells. This may be assumed to be the first step in sour gustation. But penetration observed in this way is a much slower process than gustation, hence the penetration concerned with taste can have to do only with the most superficial layer of the taste cells. It is the ease of combination with this layer that may make the difference between acetic acid and other acids. Different acids having penetrated the sur- PHYSIOLOGY OF GUSTATION 139 faces of gustatory cells at different rates, their uniform sour taste may then be ascribed to their common dissocia- tion product, the hydrogen ion. How this is accomplished is, according to Crozier, the second problem in gustation. That the sour taste is in some way dependent upon hydro- gen ions seems true beyond reasonable doubt. How these ions become effective is still a problem. 5. The Saline Taste. The saline taste is typified by that of common salt. Sodium chloride, however, is not the only substance that possesses this taste, for there is a whole range of compounds that have the same property. The chlorides of potassium, lithium, ammonium, and mag- nesium, the hydrochlorides of monomethylamine and of diethylamine, the bromides and iodides of sodium and of potassium ag well as their sulphates and nitrates are all more or less saline in taste. Aqueous solutions of most of these salts show a high degree of dissociation so that, beside undissociated mole- cules, cations and anions are present in these solutions as possible stimuli for the saline taste. Héber and Kiesow (1898) have worked on this question and have declared in favor of ions as the stimulating agents in contrast with undissociated molecules. Kahlenberg (1898) arrived at the same conclusion. He found that a solution of sodium chloride, 0.02 molar, was scarcely to be distinguished by taste from pure water. At 0.04 molar it was a trifle saline. Corresponding solutions of sodium acetate were almost tasteless and certainly not in the least saline. Hence it is evident that the salty taste of sodium chloride is due to chlorine ions and not to sodium ions. This con- clusion is supported by the fact that 0.04 molar solutions of potassium chloride and of lithium chloride are also 140 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES salty. Other chlorides, such as those of ammonium and magnesium, have a saline taste. This taste, however, is not due exclusively to chlorine ions. Sodium bromide at 0.02 molar has a faint saline taste and is unquestionably salty at 0.04. Hence the bromine ion must also be a stimulus for the salty taste. Kahlenberg (1898) reported it as not quite so effective in this respect as the chlorine ion. Although solutions of sodium iodide at 0.04 or even at 0.02 molar could be distinguished from water, they did not give an unques- tionable taste till a concentration of 0.16 was reached. At this concentration the taste was markedly saline. A corresponding solution of potassium iodide was found also to be salty though in this instance the taste was ac- companied by a slightly bitter flavor. From these con- siderations it is evident that iodine ions are saline stimuli though they are not so effective in this respect as chlorine or bromine ions are. The sulphates of sodium and of potassium as well as their nitrates also have a saltiness in their tastes and it has been shown in these instances that the sulphate and nitrate ions are the effective agents. Thus all saline tastes depend upon ionic stimuli, and, as Kahlenberg (1898) and Hober and Kiesow (1898) have maintained, these ions are always anions, a conclusion supported by the more recent work of Herlitzka (1908). 6. The Bitter Taste. The bitter taste is character- istic of almost all alkaloids, and of certain unrelated sub- stances such as dextro-mannose, the glucosides, picric acid, ether, and certain inorganic salts such as magnesium sulphate or Epsom salt. Magnesium salts when sufficiently concentrated have a bitter taste and this taste is due to the magnesium ion. This is in strong contrast with the ions of sodium and PHYSIOLOGY OF GUSTATION 141 of lithium, which are apparently almost tasteless. Am- monium and calcium ions are also bitter in taste. In picric acid the sour taste of the hydrogen ion is probably completely masked by the bitter taste of the picric anion though the taste of this substance as well as that of ether, dextro-mannose, the glucosides and other such substances appears never to have been fully investigated. But the substances that are especially characterized by bitter tastes are the alkaloids. These include such compounds as morphine, cocaine, pilocarpine, quinine, nicotine, and strychnine, the bitterest of all substances. In aqueous solution these substances are the most effec- tive agents in exciting the bitter taste. Gley and Richet (1885) determined that strychnine monochloride could be tasted at 0.0006 gram per liter of water. Of such a solution 5 cubic centimeters, which was the volume used by these investigators in their individual tests, contains only 0.000005 gram of the bitter material and yet this very small amount produces a pronounced taste. Quinine hydrochloride can be tasted in a solution as dilute as 0.00004 molar (Parker and Stabler, 1913). Thus bitter substances far exceed hydrogen ions in their capacity to stimulate at high dilution. What peculiar chemical feature is characteristic of bitter organic substances whereby they excite this taste is at best, poorly understood. Henry (1895) pointed out that the bitter compounds often included the group / CH.0OH NO,—C— a. and this was confirmed by Cohn (1914) whose extensive study of the sapid organic compounds led him to the con- clusion that there were several such groups, the presence 142 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES of any one of which in a given compound would give it a bitter taste. In dyes color-radicals have long been called chromophores; by analogy radicals concerned with taste have been designated saprophores. Among these are hydroxyl and the amine group. The nitro group NO, is often associated, especially in aromatic compounds, with a bitter taste. When three NO, groups are included in a given compound, it always has a bitter taste; when two are at hand, the taste is commonly bitter but not invariably so; when only one such group is present, the taste is not bitter. Thus the number of NO, groups ap- pears to be significant in the production of a bitter taste. The bitter taste, then, is excited by several classes of substances; by ions that, with the possible exception of the anion of picric acid, are apparently always cations Herlitzka (1908), magnesium, ammonium, and calcium; and by organic substances, especially the alkaloids, which may act either through their molecules or through certain atomic groups, the so-called saprophores. 7. The Sweet Taste. The sweet taste is excited by the diatomic and polyatomic alcohols of the aliphatic series, by the aldehydes and ketons derived from these alcohols, and especially by the hexoses whose polymeriza- tion products, the disaccharides and polysaccharides, are in this respect particularly important. Besides these carbohydrates other organic compounds, such as chloro- form, dextro-asparagine, and saccharine, have sweet tastes. Among inorganic substances neutral acetate of lead, often called sugar of lead, and the salts of glucinum are known to be sweet. Solutions of the alkalis, if they are of appropriate dilution, are said likewise to excite this taste. PHYSIOLOGY OF GUSTATION 143 What occasions the sweet taste of lead acetate seems never to have been ascertained. On the other hand glu- cinum chloride and glucinum sulphate, both of which break into ions in water, have been shown by Hober and Kiesow (1898) to owe their sweet taste to their common constituent, the glucinum ion. Thus ions are one means of exciting this taste. But the sweet taste, like the bitter one, is primarily associated with organic compounds. It centers about the alcohols and especially the sugars in much the same way that the bitter taste does about the alkaloids. Although the halogenated hydrocarbon chloroform and the aromatic compound saccharine are both sweet, the latter about 500 times as much so as cane sugar, the great majority of sweet substances are aliphatic alcohols and their derivatives. Ethyl alcohol is sweetish in taste as well as the trihydric alcohol glycerol, but the type of sweet substances is cane sugar or sucrose. This can be tasted in aqueous solution to about 0.02 molar; in weaker concentrations it is diffi- cult to distinguish it from pure water. Ethyl alcohol cannot be tasted in solutions much weaker than 3 molar, a relatively high concentration (Parker and Stabler, 1913). What determines the sweet taste in carbohydrates is by no means settled. It apparently turns upon very slight differences. These are sometimes sterioisomeric in character. Thus, as already stated, dextro-asparagine is sweet and levo-asparagine is tasteless. Dextro-man- nose is sweet and its stereoisomer dextro-glucose is bitter. Other such examples are known. In some instances slight changes in composition are accompanied by con- siderable changes in taste. Thus, according to Thoms and Nettesheim (1920), dulcin loses its sweetening power 144 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES when acidic or basic substitutes are introduced into its benzene nucleus. The introduction into a sweet molecule of any considerable radical, especially an aromatic one, is very likely to be followed by a change from sweet to bitter. Cohn (1914) made an elaborate comparison of the constitution of the sweet substances, as he did that of the bitter compounds, and came to the conclusion that these substances like the bitter ones contained particular groups of atoms that determined their taste and that he designated as glucogenes. Thus among alcohols one hy- droxyl is accompanied with slight sweetness and four or five with intense sweetness. But notwithstanding the extent of Cohn’s comparisons, Oertly and Myers (1919) found his generalizations inadequate, and pro- posed in place of his hypothesis one in which two groups were assumed to be present in every sweet molecule. Fol- lowing by analogy the terminology used for dyes, one of these groups was called a glucophore and the other an auxogluc. By a close comparison of the sugars, amino acids, and halogen derivatives of the hydrocarbons, they believed they could identify at least six glucophores and nine auxoglucs. The glucophores are (1) CH,OH-CHOH., (2) -CO-CHOH-(H), (3) CO,H-CHNH.,, (4) -CH,ONO,, (5) oa and (6) CHit-CHP’-- The auxoglues are (1) H-, (2) CH;-, (8) CH,CH,-, (4) CH,-CH,-CH,-, (5) (CH;),CH-, (6) CH,OH-, (7) CH.CHOH-, (8) CH,OH- CH,-, and (9) radicals C,H»,.,0, of normal polyhe- dric alcohols. An illustration of the way in which Oertly and Myers’ theory may be made to apply to sweet substances is given PHYSIOLOGY OF GUSTATION 145 in the following table in which the resolution of a number of sweet compounds into glucophores and auxoglues is indicated. Table VII. A table of sweet organic compounds (aliphatic series) showing the constitution of the compound and its resolution into a glucophore and an auxogluc, from Oertly and Myers (1919) Name of Compound Constitution Glucophore Auxogluc Glycol CH,OH-CH.OH CH,OH-CHOH H- Glycerol CH,OH-CHOH-CH,OH CH,OH-CHOH CH.OH- Fructose CH.OHCO (CHOH),CH.OH -COCHOH-(H ) CnHoen+0n- Glycine CH.NH.-COOH -CHNH.-COOH H- Ethyl nitrate C.H,ONO, -CH,ONO, CH,- Notwithstanding the elaborate attempts of Cohn and of Oertly and Myers to elucidate the chemoreception of sweet substances, the subject must be admitted to be one that is far from settled. What may be said with cer- tainty is that the sweet taste, like the bitter taste, is ex- cited both by ions and by organic molecules the details of whose activity, however, are by no means fully worked out. 8. Inadequate Stimuli. Taste is somewhat remark- able for its paucity of inadequate stimuli. Although the tongue is very sensitive to temperature differences, these changes do not seem to excite the gustatory receptors. It is questionable whether mechanical stimulation, such as tapping the tongue as practised by the older physiolo- gists, will call forth sensations of taste. The only really effective form of inadequate stimulus for the gustatory organs seems to be the electric current. As early as 1752 Sulzer noted the peculiar sensations when two dif- 10 146 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES ferent metals are placed simultaneously on the tongue. This observation was independently made by Volta in 1792 who believed these sensations to be produced by the electrical stimulation of the organs of taste, for he ob- tained the same effects by passing an electric current through the tongue. Five years later, however, Humboldt pointed out that the real stimulating agent in the so-called electric taste might be the substances produced by electrolysis at the region where the current passes from the electrode into the tongue rather than the electric current itself. Thus was established the two opposing views concerning electrical taste. If an electric current is passed through the human body in such a way that the anode is applied to the tongue and the cathode to some other part, a sour taste develops around the anode. If the electrodes are reversed in posi- tion, an alkaline taste appears at the cathode. This con- forms with what takes place when an electric current is passed through an alkaline solution, such as the saliva; hydrogen ions appear at the anode and hydroxyl ions at the cathode. Why then are not these two substances, the hydrogen and the hydroxyl, the stimuli for the char- acteristic tastes? But Rosenthal (1860) and, before him, Volta, found that if the anode is a weak alkaline solution into which the tip of the tongue is dipped, a sour taste nevertheless arises, though the hydrogen ions under such a combination might be expected to be neutralized immediately by the hydroxy] present. Rosenthal also showed that if an elec- tric current is passed through the bodies of two persons and is completed by bringing the tip of the tongue of one of these individuals into contact with that of the other, PHYSIOLOGY OF GUSTATION 147 the two persons experience different sensations, one sour and the other alkaline. These and other like experi- ments led Rosenthal to conclude that the electric current itself was the stimulating agent and not the materials produced by electrolysis. But it must not be forgotten that the electrical stimu- lation of organs of taste is productive of a variety of sensations. Thus in 1798 Ritter showed that after a cur- rent had been passing for some time through the tongue the sour taste of the anode changed first to bitter and then to alkaline while the cathodic alkaline taste changed to sour. Hofmann and Bunzel (1897) demonstrated that during the passage of a current there is at the cathode a burning bitter sensation which changes to a sour metal- lic taste on breaking the current. The initial taste they believed to be due to the products of electrolysis. Von Zeynek (1898) also accepted this explanation for the elec- tric taste. Gertz (1919), however, pointed out that the alternating current is really more effective in exciting taste than the direct current and that hence the electric taste may be aroused by other means than the products of electrolysis. It is not at all impossible that the gusta- tory organs may be excited in both ways: by the materials of electrolytic decomposition and directly by the electric current. But how an electric current can stimulate gus- tation without in some way bringing about a chemical change, at least within the gustatory cell, is difficult to imagine. The extreme sensitiveness of the organs of taste to electrical stimulation is not only characteristic of man, but is probably found throughout the vertebrates. Among fishes the catfish or horned pout, Amiurus, is ap- 148 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES parently easily stimulated in this way. The head and especially the eight barbels about the mouth of Amiurus are richly supplied with taste-buds. These organs, like those on the human tongue, are apparently extremely sensitive to metals probably because of the slight electric currents produced by these bodies, for, the fishes respond with great readiness to a weak constant current from a dry cell. If such a current is led into an aquarium through a water-filled glass tube and out again by a sim- ilar tube, the water acting as a conductor, catfishes can be readily stimulated by bringing such tubes close to them. If the current is sufficiently reduced (a little less than a microampere) the fishes will approach the open ends of the tubes and nibble at the current as though it were a bait, thus giving evidence that the organs stimu- lated are the gustatory receptors (Parker and Van Heusen, 1917). Hence the electric stimulus seems in every way to duplicate the stimulus normal for the organ of taste, a solution of a sapid substance. 9. Distribution of Tastes on the Tongue. The four well-recognized tastes, as the preceding sections show, are normally excited by very different stimuli. The sour taste is dependent upon the cation, hydrogen. The saline taste is called forth by a number of anions: chlorine, bromine, iodine, and the sulphate and nitrate ions. The bitter taste has as stimuli the alkaloids, such cations as magnesium, ammonium, and calcium, and possibly the anion of picric acid. The sweet taste depends upon such organic compounds as the sugars and alcohols, and on saccharine, on lead acetate, and on hydroxyl and gluci- num ions. The four tastes, therefore, are excited by entirely independent groups of stimuli and it is a matter PHYSIOLOGY OF GUSTATION 149 of importance to ascertain in what other respects they are independent. This question can be well approached from the standpoint of their distribution on the tongue. As already mentioned, the tongue of the normal adult human being is only in part gustatory, its lower surface and the central portion of its upper surface being A B Cc D Fia. 36.—Diagrams of the right half of the human tongue illustrating the distribution of the four tastes; the dots represent the area and concentration of a giventaste: A, the sour taste, concentrated on the edge; B, the saline taste, concentrated at the tip and on the edge; C, the bitter taste, concentrated at the base; D, the sweet taste, concentrated at the tip. Modified from Hanig, 1901. devoid of taste. This sense is resident only on the tip, the edges and the dorsal part of the root of the tongue. The distribution of the several tastes over the gustatory portion of the tongue has been a matter of investigation for physiologists during more than a cen- tury, and the results, particularly among the recent workers, have been remarkably consistent and harmoni- ous. Shore (1892), Kiesow (1894-1896), and Hanig (1901) have been the most important recent contributors 150 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES to this subject. Their work shows that the four tastes have decidedly individual distributions on the tongue. The sour taste is best developed on the lateral edges of the tongue and diminishes from these regions toward the tip, the base, and the central anesthetic area (Fig. 36, A). The saline taste is most pronounced at the tip and on the lateral margins of the tongue and diminishes at the base; toward the central area it ends rather abruptly (Fig. 36, B). The bitter taste is most characteristic of the base of the tongue especially in the region of the vallate pa- pille whence it diminishes rapidly toward the central area and over the lateral edges to the tip (Fig. 36,C). The sweet taste is at its maximum at the tip of the tongue and di- minishes thence along the lateral margins to the base (Fig. 36, D). Thus sour is represented by two marginal re- gions, saline by a horse-shoe shaped area at the tip, bit- ter by a single center at the base, and sweet by one at the tip. It is difficult to explain these differences in the distribution of the tastes except on the assumption of an independent sensory mechanism for each taste. This interpretation of taste is strengthened by what has been learned from the local stimulation of the tongue. Oehrwall (1891) mapped out a group of fungiform papille near the tip of the tongue in such a way that the individual papille could be reidentified and studied. Each papilla was stimulated by applying to it the point of a very fine brush loaded with a strong solution of a given substance. The substances used were tartaric acid 2 per cent, common salt 20 per cent, quinine hydro- chloride 2 per cent, and sugar 40 per cent. The salt was finally abandoned because of the indistinctness of the sensation. In all 125 easily identifiable papille were PHYSIOLOGY OF GUSTATION 151 tested. All of these were found to be sensitive to touch, warmth, and cold, but only 98 were stimulated by the solutions used. The results of these tests so far as they relate to taste are given in the following tabulation. Test Substances Acid Quinine Sugar Number of papille sensitive.......... 91 7 79 Number exclusively sensitive........... 12 0 3 The fact that 12 papille were stimulated by tartaric acid but not by quinine or sugar and that 3 were stimu- lated by sugar but not by tartaric acid or quinine is strong evidence in favor of the independence of at least the sour and sweet tastes. Oehrwall also discovered by his method of local stimulation that the surface of the tongue between the papille was insensitive to taste. This result confirmed the earlier work of Goldscheider and Schmidt (1890) who had also shown that when pa- pille were tested with a mixed solution of sugar and quinine sometimes a sweet taste was evoked and at other times a bitter one. This whole subject was thoroughly re-investigated by Kiesow (1898), who used as stimuli solutions of hydro- chloric acid, of sodium chloride, of quinine sulphate and of sugar. Of the 39 papille tested 4 were found to be insensitive. The conditions presented by the remaining 35 are summarized in the following tabulation. Test Substances Acid Salt Quinine Sugar Number of papille sensitive........-. 18 18 13 26 Number exclusively sensitive........ 3 3 0 7 Failed of stimulation................ 17 17 22 9 These results confirm and extend the original findings of Oehrwall in that they show the independence of the sour, saline, and sweet tastes. The fact that the region 152 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES tested was near the tip of the tongue is probably the occasion of the absence in the records of any papille stimulated exclusively by quinine, for this region is one in which the bitter taste is least developed. Kiesow also observed that the papilla presented a great variety of combinations in taste; some were open to stimulation by two of the four reagents used, others by three and still others by all four. It is known that each gustatory papilla carries a number of taste-buds but whether in those papille that are open to stimulation by two or more sapid solutions there is a corresponding number of kinds of buds, one for acid, another for salt reception and so forth, cannot be stated, for it is possible that this dif- ferentiation may reach to the gustatory cells of each bud. What can be affirmed, however, is that in those papille that respond exclusively to one taste all taste- buds with their contained cells must be so constituted as to be open to stimulation by one class of sapid substances and to be closed to all other classes. Thus in a papilla that is stimulated exclusively by acid the protoplasm of the receptive cells in all its taste-buds must be organized to receive acid stimuli and not to react to those for the saline, bitter and sweet tastes. This conclusion amounts to a very complete confirmation of Miiller’s theory of the specific energy of sensory nerves as it is interpreted in modern physiology and to the component theory as ap- plied to taste. --10. Action of Drugs on Taste. Certain drugs have the remarkable property of temporarily diminishing or even obliterating taste. Edgeworth discovered that af- ter a person had masticated the leaves of the Indian asclepiad Gymnema sylvestre, he was unable to taste PHYSIOLOGY OF GUSTATION 153 sugar. Hooper (1887) extracted from the leaves of this plant a compound that he named gymnemic acid and that he showed to be the substance that affected taste. Ac- cording to him gymnemic acid tends to obliterate the sweet and bitter tastes but has no effect on the saline and sour tastes. Shore (1892) studied the influence of gym- nema decoctions on the tongue and found that they oblit- erated the sweet taste of glycerine very easily and the bitter taste of quinine almost as readily. They had very little effect on the taste of sulphuric acid or of common salt. These results were confirmed in the main by Kiesow (1894). Thus gymnemic acid divides the tastes into at least two distinct classes, one including sweet and bitter, and the other sour and saline. Stovaine is also known to abolish sweet and bitter without obliterating saline and sour (Ponzo, 1909) and eucaine-B especially reduces bitter (Fontana, 1902). Saline and sweet tastes and in less degree bitter are reduced by a 0.02 normal solution of chromium nitrate (Herlitzka, 1909). The effect of cocaine on taste is very profound. Von Anrep (1880) and Knapp (1884) observed that this nar- cotic was capable of abolishing completely all taste. Aducco and Mosso (1886) showed, however, that it acted more energetically on the bitter taste than on the others. Shore (1892) found that on treatment with cocaine the buccal sensations were extinguished in a definite order as follows: pain, bitter, sweet, saline, sour, and touch, a sequence confirmed by Kiesow (1894). Thus cocaine is more selective in its effect on taste than gymnemic acid and leads to a separation of all four tastes. 11. Substances with two Tastes. A number of sub- 154 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES stances are known that possess different tastes depend- ing upon the part of the tongue to which they are applied. Many salts have this peculiarity Herlitzka (1908). Potassium nitrate and magnesium sulphate are both said to be saline in taste when applied at the tip of the tongue and bitter at its base. This action, however, is proba- bly due not to the molecules of the salts but to their ions. At the tip of the tongue the anions stimulate the organs of the saline taste, which in this location are in the ascen- dency, and at the base of the tongue the cations stimulate the organs of the bitter taste which is here better devel- oped. There is thus a kind of competition between the two sets of ions, as Herlitzka has expressed it, and in one locality the anions win out, in the other the cations. Such an explanation, however, does not apply to sub- stances like parabrombenzoic sulphinide. This material, according to Howell and Kastle (1887) has a distinctly sweet taste when applied to the tip of the tongue and an intensely bitter one at the back. Duleamarin, the gluco- side from bittersweet, is another case of the same kind; a list of these is given by Sternberg (1898). In these in- stances ions are probably not involved, but each substance is a stimulus for both the organs of the sweet taste and of the bitter taste. It seems impossible to explain double tastes such as those just mentioned except on the assump- tion of independent receptor systems for the tastes con- cerned. Thus far no substance is known that excites three categories of tastes though I know of no reason why such a substance might not exist. 12. Latency of Taste Sensations. Von Wittich (1868) appears to have been the first to attempt to meas- ure the interval of time between the application of a PHYSIOLOGY OF GUSTATION 155 stimulus to a gustatory portion of the tongue and the response of the subject. He used an electric current as a stimulus and found the average time to be 0.167 seconds. Von Vintschgau and Honigschmied (1875-1877), who used solutions of various substances as stimuli, found that the times were different for the different tastes, being short- est for saline, longer for sweet, still longer for sour and longest for bitter. They also discovered that the times were different for the tip of the tongue and its base. Their results were confirmed in general by the later in- vestigations of Beaunis (1884), of Henry (1895) and of Kiesow (1903) who recorded the following periods for the tip of the tongue: Sodium chloride.................0 eee ee 0.308 second Supar. cscaues shaders ea kegdgaieds one's 0.446 second Hydrochloric acid............--- eee eee 0.536 second QU igs ceknw cand ds5 aap ERS aa AER 1.082 second These records agree with Schirmer’s observation (1859) that when a solution containing all four sapid sub- stances is placed on the tongue, the subject experiences the sensations in the order saline, sweet, sour, and bitter. They also confirm the opinion that the four tastes are separate entities. One aspect of the problem of gustatory latency turns on temperature. If the stimulation of a taste receptor is a chemical operation, this process should exhibit a con- siderable temperature co-efficient that might make itself felt in a change in the latent period. But so far as Tam aware no studies with this point in view have been car- ried out. 13. Taste Alterations; After-tastes. A number of 156 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES substances are known whose solutions so affect the tongue that its powers of taste become temporarily changed. Thus these substances give rise to what have been called after-tastes. In almost every instance the taste that suffers change is the sweet taste and this is increased in efficiency. Thus Aducco and Mosso (1886) found that after the tongue had been held in dilute sulphuric acid for five to ten minutes, distilled water was then capable of exciting a very sweet taste. A solution of quinine was also sweet to the taste at the tip of the tongue, but it remained normally bitter at the base. This change was not brought about by other acids such as acetic, citric, and formic. Frentzel (1896) also noticed that after washing out the mouth with a weak solution of copper sulphate, smoking a cigar was accompanied by a sweet taste. ; NS i S ; ; ne =r 2 _— ey : NX Fie. 37.—Diagrams illustrating the receptor systems of the following verte- brate chemoreceptors: a, olfactory organ and vomero-nasal organ; b, organ of the common chemical sense; c, gustatory organ. After Parker, 1912. If the structure of the several vertebrate chemore- ceptors is compared, it will be found that they present three types of organization (Fig.37). These types can be best appreciated from the standpoint of their constit- uent neurones. In the olfactory and vomero-nasal organs the neurones have cell bodies in the receptive epithelium and their axons extend as nerve-fibers from these bodies into the central organ. In the common chem- ical organs the receptors are free-nerve terminations in the mucous epithelium of the mouth, the nose, the eye and other such apertures, from which axons provided with 182 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES deep-seated cell-bodies extend into the central organs. Finally, in the gustatory organs the taste-buds are com- posed of receptive epithelial cells that are in synaptic relations with nerve terminals essentially like free end- ings from which axons with deep-seated cell-bodies pass into the central organs. These three types of structure include, so far as is known, all the vertebrate chemorecep- tors. To a common stimulus, like ethyl alcohol, the ol- factory type has been shown to have by far the lowest threshold followed in order by the gustatory and the com- mon chemical types both of which are near together in this respect. When these three types are compared with the recep- tors of other animals, it is seen that the olfactory type reproduces almost exactly that found in the skins of many invertebrates, and that the other two types are character- istically vertebrates. The integument of animals even as simply organized as sea-anemones is rich in receptive cells that reproduce in almost every detail the conditions of the vertebrate olfactory neurones. Not only do these lowly organized forms show this structural similarity in their integumentary cells, but they are known to be so responsive to minute amounts of material wafted from distant food through the water to them that they have been for a long time past credited with olfaction (Pollock, 1883). Thus the vertebrates olfactory epithelium and the integument of aquatic invertebrates are strikingly alike. It is more than probable that the vertebrates have descended from ancestors whose skin was an epithelium like that on the exterior of a sea-anemone and that, as this skin thickened over most of the body to give the necessary protection to the slowly metamorphosing ani- INTERRELATION OF THE CHEMICAL SENSES 183 mal, the future olfactory region remained unchanged and thus retained its original invertebrate character. This region became the olfactory epithelium of the developing vertebrate, the most primitive chemoreceptor in this group of animals. The organs next in this series were the common chem- ical receptors. The neurones for these organs were differentiated from the neurones of the primitive inverte- brate skin by a central migration of their cell-bodies till they became part of the spinal ganglia and thus left in the integument free-nerve terminations as receptors. This type of chemoreceptor is found generally in the skin of fishes and amphibians and in the mouths, nasal chambers and other moist cavities of the air-inhabiting vertebrates. The third and last type of the vertebrate chemorecep- tor is the gustatory organ. In this type the conducting neurone presents exactly the condition met with in the common chemical receptor excepting that its nerve ter- minals, instead of being free in the integument, are asso- ciated with epithelial taste-buds. This type of receptor was probably derived from the second type by the appro- priation of taste-cells from the integumentary epithelium. Thus the three types of vertebrate chemoreceptors appear to be genetically related in that the olfactory organs represent what may be called the first generation, the common chemical the second, and the gustatory the third (Parker, 1912). But within each type much detailed differentiation has taken place. It seems to be quite impossible to ex- plain the variety of olfactory sensations without assum- ing a differentiation among the receptors of the olfactory field. In the common chemical sense the receptors on 184 SMELL, TASTE, ALLIED SENSES the moist surfaces of the eye, judged by the sensations they give rise to, are distinguishable from those in the epithelium of the mouth and of the nose. But this special differentiation is best seen in the gustatory organs. Here three and probably four well defined senses can be dis- tinguished, namely, sour, saline, sweet, and bitter. And though separate receptors for these four senses have not as yet been distinguished structurally, their functional separation is beyond doubt. It is because of the repeated differentiations that characterize the evolution not only of the chemoreceptors but of the other groups of like organs that a classification of them or even a simple enumeration proves to be so unsatisfactory. For they are not unitary elements that can be counted like the fingers on the hand nor are they sufficiently co-ordinated to make classifications easy and natural. They are like the whole organism itself in that they exibit that kind of diversity that characterizes evo- lutionary flux. 6. BIBLIOGRAPHY Burx, M. 1884-1885. Experimentelle Beitriige zur Lésung der Frage tiber die specifische Energie der Hautnerven. Zeitschr. Biol., Bd. 20, pp. 141-156, Bd. 21, pp. 145-160. Cannon, W. B, 1918. The Physiological Basis of Thirst. Proc. Roy. Soc., London, B, vol. 90, pp. 283-301. Cannon, W. B., anp A. L. WasHpurn. 1912. An Explanation of Hunger. Amer. Jour. Physiol., vol 29, pp. 441-454. Cartson, A. J. 1916. The Control of Hunger in Health and Disease. Chicago, 319 pp. Fiscuer, E., unp F, PENZoLpT. 1886. Ueber die Empfindlichkeit des Geruch- sinnes. Sitzb. phys.-med. Soc., Erlangen., Heft 18, pp. 7-10. FLourens, M. P. 1828. Expériences sur les canaux semi-circulaires de Voreille chez les oiseaux. Ann. Sci. Nat., tome 15, pp. 113-124. INTERRELATION OF THE CHEMICAL SENSES 185 Von Frey, M. 1896. Untersuchungen iiber die Sinnesfunctionen der menschlichen Haut. Abh. Sdchs. Gesell. Wissensch., math.-phys., Cl. Leipzig, Bd. 23, pp. 169-266. Gury, E., er C. Ricuer. 1885. De la sensibilité gustative pour les alcaloides. Compt. rend. Soc. Biol., Paris, tome 37, pp. 237-239. Herrick, C. J. 1918. An Introduction to Neurology. Philadelphia and London, 394 pp. Von Krigs, J. 1904. Die Gesichtsempfindungen. Nagel, Handb. Physiol. Afenschen, Bd. 3, pp. 109-282. LARGUIER DES Bancets, J. 1912. Le Gofit et l’Odorat, Paris, 94 pp. Mutter, L. R. 1920. Ueber den Durst und ueber die Durstempfindung. Deutsch. med. Wochenschr., Bd. 46, pp. 113-116. OEHRWALL, H, 1901, Die Modalitiils- und Qualitiitsbegriffe in der: Sinnes- physiologie und deren Bedeutung. Skandinavisches Archiv, Physiol., Bd. 11, pp. 245-272. Parker, G. H. 1912. The Relation of Smell, Taste, and the Common Chem- ical Sense in Vertebrates. Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., Philadelphia, vol. 15, pp. 221-234. ParkKER, G. H., 1914. The Directive Influence of the Sense of Smell in the Dogfish. Bull. United States Bur. Fish., vol. 33, pp. 63-68. ParkER, G. H., anp E. M. StaBrer. 1913. On Certain Distinctions between Taste and Smell. Amer. Jour. Physiol., vol. 32, pp. 230-240. Pottock, W. H. 1883. On Indications of a Sense of Smell in Actinia. Jour, Linn, Soc., Zool., vol. 16, pp. 474-476 Rrpot, T. 1920. Le Gotit et ’Odorat. Jour. Psych., ann. 17, pp. 5-15. ScHULTZE, M. 1866. Zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Retina. Arch. mik, Anat., Bd. 2, pp. 165-286. SHERRINGTON, C. S. 1906. The Integrative Action of the Nervous System. New York, 411 pp. , INDEX Acetic acid, 137 Activators, 18, 21 Adequate olfactory stimuli, 80 Aducco, V., et U. Mosso, 153, 156, 162 Ageusia, 156 Aleock, N., 33, 39 Aleohol, 171 Alkaline taste, 134, 135 Alkaloids, 141 Allison, V. C., and S. H. Katz, 52, 55, 56, 88 Althaus, J., 81, 88 Amiurus, 116, 160, 173 Ammocoetes, 104 Amphioxus. 103 Anosmia, 71, 72, 83 Von Anrep, B., 153, 162 Anton, W., 92, 100 Appetite, 179 Arnstein, C., 29, 39, 121, 122, 128 Aronsohn, E., 57, 58, 60, 63, 70, 81, 83, 85, 88 Asai, T., 33, 34, 39 Auxogluec, 144 Babuchin, A., 29, 39 Backman, E. L., 60, 61, 77, 88 Baginsky, B., 125, 128 Baglioni, 8., 64, 68, 88 Ballowitz, E., 31, 39 Barbus, 64 Barral, F., et A. Ranc, 162 Basal cells, 29, 30, 119 Beaunis, H., 155, 162 Becker, C. T., und R. O. Hertzog, 138, 162 Bedford, E. A., 39 Beer, T., A. Bethe, und J. von Uexkiill, 21 Benzoin, 70 Bethe, A., 17, 21, 22 Bidder, F., 48, 87 Bishop, J., 43, 88 Bitter taste, 140, 150 Blakeslee, A. F., 72, 88 Blaue, J., 34, 39 Blix, M., 175, 184 Bowden, H. H., 39 Braeuning, H., 108 Broman, I., 99, 100 Brookover, C., 98, 100 Von Brunn, A., 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 39, 96, 97, 98, 100 Bulbar fibers, 123 Bunzel, R., 147, 164 Cannon, W. B., 179, 184 Cannon, W. B., and A. L. Washburn, 179, 184 Carlson, A. J., 179, 184 Castronovo, A., 29, 33, 34, 40 Catfish, 65 Chemical relations of odors, 76 Chemoreceptors, 169, 175, 176, 179 Chorda tympani, 126 Chumming, 68 Circus movements, 67 Classification of receptors, 176 Cloquet, 173 Cocaine, 153 Coelenterates, 19 Coghill, G. E., 106, 108 Cohn, G., 78, 88, 141, 144, 162 Cold ‘organs, 179 Cole, L. W., 103, 107, 108 Common chemical organs, 181 Common chemical sense, 102 Comparative distribution of taste- buds, 115 Comparative physiology of taste, 160 Component theory of taste, 152, 158 187 188 Conche, 23, 27, 38 Copeland, M., 66, 68, 88 Crozier, W. J., 103, 104, 107, 108, 138, 139, 158, 162, 163 Cushing, H., 125, 126, 128 Diemyctylus, 68 Disse, J., 34, 36, 39, 40 Distribution of taste, 148 Dogfish, 64, 173 Dogiel, A. S., 33, 40, 115, 123, 128 Drasch, O., 125, 128 Drugs and taste, 152 Dugés, A., 43, 88 Durand, A., 48, 60, 68, 88 Durrans, T. H., 88 Duval, 134, 163 Von Ebner, V., 116, 128 Ecker, A., 28, 40 Eckhard, C., 28, 31, 40 Edgeworth, 152 Ehrlich, P., 29, 40 Electrical stimulation of taste, 147 Eschricht, D. F., 43, 89 Ethmoid cells, 26 Extrabulbar cells, 120 Eye, 179 Fischer, E., und F. Penzoldt, 53, 54, 56, 89, 184 Flourens, M. P., 174, 184 Foliate papille, 113 Fontana, A., 153, 163 Franke, G., 45, 47, 89 Free-nerve endings in olfactory re- gion, 34 Frentzel, J.. 156, 163 Von Frey, M., 54, 89, 135, 163, 175, 185 Frélich, R., 44, 86, 89 Frontal sinus, 26 Fungiform papills, 112, 150 Fusari, R., et A. Panasci, 121, 128 Garman, S., 89 Gaupp, E., 100 INDEX Gawrilenko, A., 93, 100 Gemmal fibers, 123 Genetic relations of chemoreceptors, 181 Gertz, H., 147, Glaser, O., 71, 89 Gley, E., 162 Gley, E., et C. Richet, 141, 163, 170, 185 Glucophore, 144 Goldfish, 63 Golgi, 32 Goldscheider, A., und H. Schmidt, 151, 163 Graber, V., 15, 22 Graberg, J., 110, 114, 116, 118, 120, 128, 129 Grassi, V., und A. Castronovo, 29, 33, 34, 40 Greenberg, D., 69, 91 Group of chemical receptors, 174 Gustatory chiasma, 125 Gustatory contrasts, 156 Gustatory nerves, 123 Gustatory nerve fibers, 127 Gustatory organs, 110, 182 Gustatory senses, 158 Gustatory stimuli, 133 Gymnema, 152 Gymnemic acid, 153 163 Hahn, R., 132, 164 Haller, B., 73, 115, 129 Hamlin, H. E., 100 Hammerhead shark, 67 Hiinig, D. P., 132, 149, 163 Harvey, R. B., 138, 163 Haycraft, J. B., 57, 77, 87, 157, 162 Hearing, 176 Heat organs, 179 Heidenhain, M., 113, 115, 116, 117, 119, 129 Heiderich, F., 111, 114, 129 Henle, J., 136, 163 Henning, H., 60, 68, 69, 74, 75, 76, 78, 79, 80, 82, 87, 99, 100, 158, 163 Henry, C., 163 INDEX Henry, L., 141, 155, 163 Herlitzka, A., 135, 140, 142, 153, 154, 163 Hermann, F., 111, 118, 119, 120, 129 Herrick, C. J., 106, 108, 115, 124, 129, 160, 161, 163, 172, 175, 180, 185 Hertzog, R. O., 138, 162 Heymans, G., 156, 163 His, W., 100 Histology of vomero-nasal organ, 96 Hober, R., und F. Kiesow, 135, 139, 140, 143, 163 Hoffmann, A., 111, 129 Hofmann, F., und R. Bunzel, 147, 164 Hollingsworth, H. L., and A. T. Poffenberger, 162 Hoénigschmied, J., 124, 131, 155 Hooper, D., 153, 164 Howell, W. H., and J. H. Kastle, 154, 164 Humboldt, 146 Hunger, 179 Huyer, C., 78, 89 Inadequate gustatory stimuli, 145 Inadequate olfactory stimuli., 80 Innervation of taste-buds, 120 Insipidity, 135 Inspiration, 48 Integumentary sense, 175 Intermediate zone, 32 Interrelation of the chemical senses, 167 Intrabulbar fibers, 122 Intragemmal fibers, 122 Intragemmal spaces, 120 Irritants, 44 Jacques, P., 121, 129 Jacobson cartilage, 98 Jagodowski, K. P., 32, 33, 34, 40, 62, 89 Johnston, J. B., 115, 129 Jourdan, E., 15, 22 189 Kahlenberg, L., 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 164 Kallius, E., 31, 34, 40, 100, 116, 129 Kamon, K., 34, 40 Karpman, B., 49, 91 Kastle, J. H., 154, 164 Katz, S. H., 52, 55, 56, 88 Kayser, R., 46, 89 Kiesow, F., 132, 135, 136, 139, 140, 143, 149, 152, 153, 155, 157, 158, 163, 164 Kiesow, F., und R. Hahn, 164 Killifish, 66 Klein, E., 99, 100 Knapp, H., 153, 164 Kdlliker, A., 92, 99, 100 Kolmer, W., 119, 129 Krause, F., 125, 129 Krause, W., 28, 40, 114, 126, 129 Kremer, J. H., 62, 89, 157, 164 Von Kries, J., 175, 185 Landacre, F. L., 128, 129 Larguier des Bancels, J., 61, 87, 162, 173, 185 Larsell, O., 100 Latency of taste, 154 Lateral-line organs, 15, 179 Von Lenhossék, M., 34, 40, 97, 98, 100, 118, 120, 121, 123, 129, 130 Leydig, F., 16, 115, 117, 130 Lingual nerve, 125 Linneus, 73 Location of taste, 132 Loeb, J., 62, 89, 108 Loeb, R. F., 62, 89 Lovén, C., 110, 117, 130 Lubbock, J., 15, 22 Lucas, K., 13 Luciani, L., 68, 87, 158, 162 McCotter, R. E., 94, 101 Magendie, F., 43, 89 Marchand, L., 162 Maxillary sinus, 26 190 Mechanicoreceptors, 179 Merkel, F., 118, 130 Metallic taste, 134 Meyer, S., 125, 127, 130 Von Mihalkovies, V., 99, 101 Minimum olfactory stimulus, 49 Morrill, A. D., 33, 34, 40 Mosso, U., 153, 156, 162 Miiller, Johannes, 68, 152, 178 Miller, L. R., 179, 185 Miinch, F., 115, 130 Myers, R. G., 144, 145, 164 Nagel, W., 48, 63, 64, 67, 76, 87, 89, 103, 109, 156, 158, 162, 164 Nasal cavities, 23 Nasal membranes, 26 Nasolacrimal duct, 26 Nerves of olfaction, 42 Nerve terminals of common chem- ical sense, 104 Nettesheim, K., 143, 165 Neurones, 181 Neutralizing odors, 85 Newt, 68 Odiometer, 52 Odor mixtures, 83 Oehrwall, H., 135, 150, 151, 158, 160, 164, 176, 185 Oertly, E., and R. G. Myers, 144, 145, 164 Olfaction and radiation, 62 Olfaction in fishes, 63 Olfaction and solvents, 60 Olfactometer, 50 Olfactory acuity, 53, 77 Olfactory cell, 30 Olfactory cleft, 25 Olfactory epithelium, 27, 28 Olfactory fatigue, 69 Olfactory flagella, 32 Olfactory hairs, 31 Olfactory nerve, 35, 42 Olfactory nerve fibers, 29 Olfactory organ, 23, 36, 181 Olfactory organ of fishes, 37 157, INDEX Olfactory potency, 77 Olfactory prism, 75 Olfactory reflexes, 86 Olfactory sense buds, 34 Olfactory stimulus, 57 Olfactory vesicle, 31 Olmsted, J. M. D., 68, 89, 127, 130 Organ of Jacobson, 92 Osmophoric groups, 78 Pain, 179 Panasci, A., 121, 128 Papille of tongue, 111 Parabrombenzoic sulphinide, 154 Parker, G. H., 22, 66, 89, 90, 103, 104, 106, 109, 161, 164, 173 183, 185 Parker, G. H., and E. M. Stabler, 55, 141, 143, 165, 171 Parker, G. H., and A. P. Van Heu- sen, 148, 165 Passage of air through nasal cavity, 44 Passy, J., 54, 55, 77, 90 Paulsen, E., 45, 46, 47, 48, 90 Pawlow, J. P., 86 Penzoldt, F., 53, 54, 56, 89 Peribulbar fibers, 122 Perigemmal fibers, 122 Peter, K., 40 Physiology of gustation, 132 Physiology of olfaction, 42 Picht, F., 43, 90 Pier cells, 118 Piutti, A., 133, 165 Pollock, W. H., 182, 185 Polymorphic cells, 33 Ponzo, M., 111, 130, 165 Potassium chlorate, 156 Prins, H. J., 90 Qualities of odors, 72 Qualities of tastes, 134 Radioreceptors, 179 Ramén y Cajal, S., 29, 34, 40, 97, 98, 101, INDEX Ranvier, L., 118, 120, 125, 127, 130 Read, E. A., 40, 97, 98, 101, Recept, 177 Receptors, 18 Reflex action, 16 Retzius, G., 29, 31, 34, 40, 41, 97, 101, 119, 121, 122, 123, 130 Reuter, C., 72, 90 Ribot, T., 185 Richards, T. W., 136, 137, 165 Richet, C., 141, 163, 170 Risser, J., 68, 90 Ritter, 147 Rod cells, 118 Rollett, A., 72, 90 Rosenthal, J., 146, 147, 165 Rubaschkin, W., 35, 41 Saccharine, 142 Saline taste, 139, 150 Sandmeyer, W., 125, 127, 130 Sarasin, P., und F. Sarasin, 100, 101 Schaeffer, J. P., 24, 25, 41 Schiff, M., 43, 90, 134, 165 Schirmer, R., 155, 165 Schmidt, 151 Schultze, M., 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 41, 58, 90, 175, 185 Schulze, F. E., 115, 130 Schwalbe, G., 110, 114, 117, 118, 130 Sense organs, 13, 18, 21 Seydel, O., 100, 101 Sheldon, R. E., 64, 66, 90, 103, 104, 105, 109 Sherrington, C. S., 172, 185 Shore, L. E., 149, 153, 165 Sinuses, 25 Smell and taste, 173 Sour taste, 136, 150 Specific energy of nerves, 152, 178 Sphenoidal sinus, 26 Sponges, 21 Stabler, E. M., 55, 106, 141, 143, 165, 171 Stahr, H., 110, 111, 131 Steiner, J., 64, 90 191 Sternberg, W., 87, 184, 154, 162, 165 Stich, A., 134, 165 Stimulation of chemoreceptors, 167 Stovaine, 153 Substances with two tastes, 153 Sugar, 143 Sulzer, 145 Supporting cells, 117 Sustentacular cells, 29, 30 Sweet taste, 142, 150 Symington, J., 101 Systems of odors, 73 Tadpole, 68 Taste alteration, 155 Taste compensations, 157 Taste-bud, 110, 115 Taste cells, 117 Taste mixtures, 157 Thirst, 179 Thoms, H., and K. Nettesheim, 148, 165 Touch, 176 Tourtual, C. T., 57, 90 Trigeminal nerve, 42 True odors, 44 Tuckerman, F., 110, 111, 115, 131 Von Uexkiill, J., 64, 90 Urbantschitsch, V., 165 Valentin, G., 43, 53, 81, 85, 90, 91, 134, 165 Van Dan, C., 51, 91 Van der Stricht, 0., 31, 41 Van Gehuchten, A., 35, 41 Van Heusen, A. P., 148, 165 Vaschide, N., 58, 60, 91, 162 Vastarini-Cresi, G., 125, 131 Vomero-nasal organs, 92, 181 Veress, E., 58, 59, 60, 81, 91 Von Vintschgau, M., 87, 131, 134, 162, 165 Von Vintschgau, M., und J. Hénig- schmied, 124, 131, 155, 165 Volta, 146 Washburn, A. L., 179, 184 Weber, E. H., 57, 58, 59, 91 192 INDEX Winslow, C.-E. A., and D. Green- Zenneck, 134, 166 oe ne ee Von Zeynek, R., 147, 166 on Wittich, W., 154, ‘ Woodrow, H., and B. Karpman, 49, Zuckerkandl, E., 101 91 Zuntz, N., 156, 166 Wundt, W., 134, 166 Zwaardemaker, H., 45, 47, 48, 50, Von Wyss, H., 114, 131 51, 57, 58, 59, 62, 70, 72, 73, 76, Zander, R., 124, 131 77, 85, 87, 91, 162