y bre, Palas? a irae CaM ecg ce eee vik itcaaaal i ~~ Ss. ail x . shamat 2 ~ it + UCT ar $ ALBERT R. MANN LIBRARY Gift of William E. Davis, Jr. Cornell University The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924089421006 CORNELL UNIVERS LIBRARY TT 3 1924 089 421 006 UNIFORM WITH THIS VOLUME. New ENGLAND BIRD LIFE: BEING A MANUAL OF NEW ENGLAND ORNITHOLOGY. Revised and edited from the manuscript of Winfrid A. Stearns, Member of the Nuttall Ornithological Club, etc. By Dr. ELLIOTT COUES, U.S.A., Member of the Academy, etc. —es Part I. Oscines (Singing Birds). Illustrated, $2.50. ee , See Recommendations at end of this volume. LEE AND SHEPARD, PUBLISHERS, BOSTON. NEW ENGLAND BIRD LIFE BEING A MANUAL OF NEW ENGLAND ORNITHOLOGY REVISED AND EDITED FROM THE MANUSCRIPT OF WINFRID A. STEARNS MEMBER OF THE NUTTALL OKNITHOLOGICAL CLUB ETC. BY ELLIOTT COUES MEMBER OF THE ACADEMY ETC, PART /1. NON-OSCINE PASSERES, BIRDS OF PREY, GAME AND WATER BIRDS. BOSTON LEE AND SHEPARD PUBLISHERS NEW YORK CHARLES T. DILLINGHAM 1883 PUBLISHERS’ NOTE. As circumstances within the control of the editor have enabled him to complete the revision of the work, that portion embracing the Non-oscine Passeres and other remaining Land Birds, together with all the Water Birds, is now issued as Part II., concluding the treatise. COPYRIGHT, 1883. By LEE AND SHEPARD. All Rights Reserved. Boston STEREOTYPE FOUNDRY, No. 4 PEARL STREET. Presswork by John Wilson & Son, Cambridge. CONTENTS. PAGE EDITOR’s PREFACE ‘ Fs . : . . 3 5 5 BIRDS OF NEW ENGLAND ‘ : II Family 7yrannide : Flycatchers. 5 : ae OAT Caprinmulgide : Whippoorwills and Night-hawks, 50 Cypselide : Swifts : : ‘i : - 56 Trochilide : Humming-birds ‘ : - 59 Alcedinide: Kingfishers : : - 62 Cuculide : Cuckoos . . : : - 65 Picide + Woodpeckers . : . - 69 Strigid@ : Owls . F : - 86 Falconide: Hawks. : ; : - Or Cathartide : American Vultures . : “a 135 Columbide : Pigeons . me bs f - 139 Meleagridide : Turkeys . : : , - 145 Tetraonide : Grouse, Partridge . , - 145 Charadritde : Plovers . ij ‘ F - 163 Hematopodide: Oyster-catchers . - r v) Wg7 Recurvirostride: Avocets, Stilts . ‘ A . 180 Phalaropodide: _ Phalaropes wee ee STB Scolopacide : Snipe, &c. a rane (°) CONTENTS, Family Jb:dide : Ardeide: Gruide: Rallide : Anatide: Sulide : Pelecanide: Phalacrocoratide : Tachypetide : Laride: Procellariide : Colymbide : Podicipedide : Alcde: Ibises ‘ ‘ : is Herons Cranes 4 - Rails and their Allies Swans, Geese, and Ducks Gannets . é Pelicans . |. Cormorants : Frigates. , F Jaegers, Gulls, Terns, Skimmers, Petrels Loons . 5 Grebes. Fe F : Auks . ; . ‘ EDITOR’S PREFACE. Apotocy is due that portion of the public which may . be interested in ‘‘New England Bird Life” for the de- lay which has occurred in the preparation and publica- tion of the concluding volume of this treatise. In November, 1880, when, the revision of Mr. Stearns’ manuscript having been made through Oscdnes, the first volume had gone to press, the editor was directed by the War Department to repair to Arizona and take up the routine duties of a medical officer of the army; and it was several months before he could free himself from this annoyance by resigning his commission. It being clearly impracticable to do any literary or scientific work under such circumstances, preparation of the manuscript for the press was necessarily suspended at the point it had then reached. Proofs of the portion already in the printer’s hands having been read by the editor in Ari- zona, Part IJ., embracing Oscines, was published upon his return to Washington in September, 1881. 6 EDITOR’S PREFACE. To the same outrage is mainly to be ascribed that im- perfection of the present volume, of which no one can be more fully aware than the editor. Resuming his avo- cations with nearly a year’s arrested work of various kinds upon his hands, it was found impossible to give the present treatise all the attention he would other- wise have been able to bestow upon it. He was also cramped for room to adequately treat the many remain- ing Birds of New England in one volume which should approximately equal the first in enforced number of pages. He may therefore with propriety deprecate criti- cism of Part II., in so far as his responsibility for it is concerned ; and refer, in evidence of the embarrassment to which he alludes, to some of the matters which divided his attention during the period of which he speaks. The “Coues Check List,” etc., which was sent to press in September, 1880, revision for its second edi- tion having been completed in July of the same year, was practically suspended until his return, and further delayed in publication until June, 1882. The second edition of the “Key,” etc., long contemplated both by publisher and author, could not be put to press until some months after his return, entire rewriting of the work, with addition of much new matter, being required to bring it up to date. Each of these works being in press while the present treatise was in the same state, all of them far behindhand, the three together made unusually urgent demands upon time and patience ; and EDITOR’S PREFACE. 7 in the case of the “Key” the unavoidable delay has not yet been overcome. The “ Bibliography of Ornithology,” the third instalment of which protracted labor hap- pily appeared in November, 1880, and the “ Birds of the Colorado Valley,” Part II., having both been suspended during publication by the same ill-timed interruption, need not be considered in the present connection. But a more serious difficulty, because one involving an offi- cial obligation, occurred in the case of the “ History of North American Quadrupeds,” ordered by Congress in 1880 to be prepared and published as Vol. XIV. of the Reports of the U. S. Geological and Geographical Sur- vey of the Territories, the elaboration of the text and the superintendence of the drawing and engraving of the necessary illustrations having continuously required his attention, before, during and after the long indignity to which he was subjected. The editor takes great pleasure in recognizing the timely and valued assistance rendered in the preparation of this work by his friend, Mr. H. A. Purdie, of Boston. As in the case of Part I, Mr. Purdie has very kindly gone over the scattered published records of the species to be treated, furnishing extended memoranda, which have proved an invaluable saving of time and labor ; for which, as well as for important suggestions and criticisms made by the same well-known ornithologist in reading the proof-sheets, both author and editor are greatly indebted. 8 EDITOR'S PREFACE, In no other part of the United States have the Birds of our country been so closely and successfully studied as in New England, where a host of zealous and watchful field-naturalists, stimulated and to a great extent led by the Nuttall Ornithological Club, have brought our knowledge of bird-life in all its details near that degree of perfection which is witnessed in the writings of British authors upon the Birds of their own islands. The material for an exhaustive treatise upon New England Ornithology —if it be desired to have a com- . plete special History of New England Birds apart from those of North America at large —is ample and invit- ing. Much of it, hitherto widely scattered and in the raw, has been brought together and to a degree system- atized in the present treatise, numberless sources of information having been utilized as well as the untoward circumstances permitted; but, so far from having ex- — hausted the readily accessible data upon the subject is the editor, that he can only look upon the result of his labors as a convenient means to an end not yet accom- plished. Such remains the case, more particularly, with the Water Birds ; in respect of which the very richness of the material of which he has been unable to fully avail himself has been rather an embarrassment than otherwise. While inaccuracies of statement may pos- sibly prove to be few and not serious, very much has been left unsaid through sheer stress of time and space. A volume larger than either part of this treatise might EDITOR’S PREFACE. 9 easily and most acceptably be devoted to the Water Birds alone of New England. Much is to be expected from the concluding volumes of Baird, Brewer, and Ridgway’s “History of North American Birds ;” but these are still unpublished ; and meanwhile, with the exception of what may be found upon the Waders and Swimmers in the “Birds of the Northwest,” now already nine years old, no systematic work upon that extensive and attractive series of Birds has appeared since the Audubonian period. The growing suspicion of fatality, so to speak, which attaches to this matter, might lead an author contemplating the next systematic treatise upon Birds to consider the expediency of be- ginning at the other end of the current list, and working up from Alcid@ towards the Turdide. In the present volume some of the Water-Bird biog- raphies have been pretty fairly elaborated, and special pains have been taken to collate and sift the New Eng- land records of the rarer species, whether of the land or of the water, —those casual visitors which, while leaving no decided impress upon our Avifauna, are nevertheless a kind of beings which the ardent collector least delights to entertain unawares. In the cases of these visits, few and far between, the editor regrets still to find himself so frequently at variance with statements of fact and expressions of opinion of late authority upon the sub- ject. Yet, in the end, the fairest reciprocity of author- ship — whether regarding one whose hand has left the 10 EDITOR’S PREFACE. pen, or one whose hand still knows the weapon mightier than the sword —proves to be that sense of justice which tries the amenities of the golden rule by the best touchstone — nz/ nist verum. It is scarcely necessary to say, that, as in the case of the former volume, the author of “New England Bird Life” has in the present instance had full per- mission to make such use as he might see fit of any of the editor’s previous publications ; and it has not been necessary, under the circumstances, to always preserve the appearance of quotation. With some exceptions, the illustrations are derived from the same sources. The classification and nomenclature are of course those of the second edition of the editor’s “Check List of North American Birds ’”—that published the past year in Boston by Estes and Lauriat; this selection being made in the interest of a standard and uniform system of nomenclature, conformity with which seems to be the best means of avoiding that incessant “shuffling of names” which serves chiefly to confuse the student, and by so much to interfere with his progress in the delightful study of ornithology. E. C. SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION, WASHINGTON, D. C., Jan. 1, 1883. BIRDS OF NEW ENGLAND. FAMILY TYRANNID: FLYCATCHERS. Tue First Part of our work has been devoted to the Singing Birds, technically known as Osczne (or melodious) Passeres, which are so numerously and variously repre- sented in New England that a volume has scarcely sufficed to exhibit their habits and characteristics. But having finished our pen-portraiture of that great group, including nearly one-half of the birds of New England, we turn our attention to other aspects of bird-life, which offer us much greater variety and certainly not less interest. Part Second continues directly with the C/a- matorial (or non-melodious) Passeres, represented in New England, as they are elsewhere in North America, by the single family Zyrannide. Flycatchers abound in the warmer parts of America, where the genera and species, no less than individuals, are most numerous. Only twelve kinds, however, are found in New England ; three of which are merely strag- glers from the West and South, having each been observed but once over our border, while a fourth has only recently been ascertained to occur at all. But the remaining eight species are more or less familiar and abundant birds of our country during the migrations and in the breeding season. 12 TYRANNID# : FLYCATCHERS. SWALLOW-TAILED FLYCATCHER. MILVULUS FORFICATUS (Gm.) Sw, Chars. Tail much longer than the body, deeply forficate. First primary emarginate. Crown with a flame-colored patch. Gen- eral color hoary-ash, paler or white below, with patches of scarlet or bloody-red on the sides, and other parts of the body tinged with the same or a paler shade of red. ‘Tail black, several of the feathers extensively white or rosy. Wing about 4.50; tail nearly a foot long when fully developed. a SA & 6 SS ec ad Fic. 1.—Emargination of primaries in Tyrannide, a, Milvulus forficatus ; b, Tyrannus carolinensis; «, T. verticalis ; d. T. vociferans, This very elegant and grace- ful bird of the southwestern United States, abundant and conspicuous in Texas, is one of the three Flycatchers which have accidentally occurred in New England, each in a single instance. A specimen was taken by Mr. Carpenter, at Wauregan, Conn., about April 27, 1876 (Purdie, Bull. Nutt. Club, ii, 1877, p. 21; Merriam, B. Conn., 1877, p. 50). An- other equally exceptional case is that recorded by Dr. C. C. Abbott (Am. Nat., vi, 1872, p. 367), a specimen having been secured at Trenton, N. J., April 15, 1872. Drs. Coues and Prentiss include the spe- cies in their list of the birds of the District of Columbia; but that record being prop- erly open to doubt, the above TYRANNUS VERTICALIS: ARKANSAS FLYCATCHER. 13 remain the only authentic instances of the occurrence of the species so far beyond its usual range. ARKANSAS FLYCATCHER. TYRANNUS VERTICALIS Say, Chars. Several outer primaries gradually attenuate for a long dis- tance. Coloration olivaceous and yellow. Belly and under tail- coverts clear yellow, the back ashy-olive, changing to clear ash on the head, throat, and breast, the chin whitening ; lores and auriculars dusky ; wings dark brown with whitish edging ; tail blackish, the outer web of the outer feather white. Bill and feet black. Length, 8.00-9.00 ; extent, 16. 50; wing, nearly 5.00; tail, about 4.00 ; bill, 0.65-0.75. Another straggler to New England, this time from the West instead of the South, the Arkansas Flycatcher being chiefly a trans-Mississippian bird, extremely abun- dant in its proper habitat. It has occurred in New Eng- land in only one known instance. The late Dr. Henry Bryant recorded a specimen said to have been taken at Plympton, Maine (Pr. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., x, 1865, p. 96). There being no such place, Dr. Brewer presumed Pembroke, Maine, was meant, and so amended the record (Pr. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xvii, 1875, p. 443). Mr. Purdie later gave the correct reference, the specimen having been taken at Elliot, Maine, by Mr. George E. Brown (Bull. Nutt. Club, i, 1876, p. 73). Dr. W. P. Turnbull has instanced the occurrence of the Arkansas Flycatcher at Moorestown, New Jersey (B. E. Pa., 1869, p. 41). Mr. E. P. Bicknell notes the capture of a specimen in Riverdale, N. Y., Oct. 9, 1875 (Bull. Nutt. Club, iv, 1879, p. 60). A fourth instance . 14 TYRANNIDZ? FLYCATCHERS. of the appearance of this western bird beyond its usual range is cited by Prof. Baird in the Smithsonian Report for 1874, p. 32, where notice is given of a specimen taken in Maryland, near Washington, D. C., and found in market in that city, Sept. 30, 1874, by Mr. P. L. Jouy. These are all the cases of the kind which have come to our notice. GRAY KING-BIRD. TYRANNUS DOMINICENSIS (Gm.) Rich. Chars. Similar to 7. carolinensis. Larger; length about 9.00; extent, 16.00; wing, 5.50; tail, nearly 5.00, emarginate ; bill an inch long, very stout and turgid. Five or six primaries usually emarginate. Upper parts grayish-plumbeous, rather darker on the head, the auriculars dusky. Under parts white, shaded with ashy on the breast and sides, the under wing-coverts faintly yel- lowish. Wings and tail dusky, edged with whitish or yellowish, the tail-feathers merely indistinctly lighter at their tips, not broadly tipped with white. The proper habitat of the Gray King-bird is the West Indies and Florida, whence it occasionally strays north- ward. It has once occurred in New England, having been taken at Lynn, Mass., Oct. 23, 1869, by Mr. Charles Goodale, as recorded by Allen, Am. Nat., iii, 1870, p. 645; Maynard, Nat. Guide, 1870, p. 124; Brewer, Pr. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xvii, 1875, p. 144; Allen, Bull. Essex Inst., x, 1878, p. 19; Minot, B. N. E., 1877, p. 273, —all these records referring to the same instance. The bird is said to have also occurred on Long Island (Forest and Stream, July 23, 1874, p. 373). TYRANNUS CAROLINENSIS : KING-BIRD. 15 KING-BIRD; BEE-MARTIN. TYRANNUS CAROLINENSIS (L.) Bd. Chars. Subcrested ; crown with a flame-colored patch ; two outer primaries emarginate. Above blackish-ash, blackening on the head ; below pure white ; breast shaded with ashy ; tail broadly tipped with white ; bill and feet black. Length, about 8.00; ex- tent, 14.50; wing, 4.25-4.50; tail, 3.50; bill, less than 1.00. No one of the Flycatch- ers is more abundant in New England than this tyrant, nor is any one of them so conspicuous a figure on the highways and in the by-ways alike. The spirited creature is dis- persed over all our country, and therefore characteristic of no faunal area; but, in its local distribution, it is Fic. 2. — KING-BIRD. most numerous in cultivated and populous regions, so that the greater number of individuals in New England is constantly under the eye of man, whose regard is re- turned with cool audacity and entire self-reliance. The vehement twittering, with which the King-bird expresses the turbulent passions it feels, is one of the common sounds of the orchard, old field, and road-side, wherever the bold bird perches with martial bearing in wait for its prey, or nervously dashes in the air on quivering pinion to capture the passing insect, or put an enemy to rout. The notes have been likened to those of Swallows, but they are harsher, and pitched in a higher key. During the 16 TYRANNIDE } FLYCATCHERS. mating season few birds, if any, make more noise than the King-bird, and none are more restless, —some un- easy spirit seeming to urge this valiant knight to inces- sant deeds of daring, till one might fancy it ready to tilt against a windmill if nothing else offered. After the animated contests of the pairing season, when several ambitious males, with questionable judgment, quarrel for the privilege of securing a vixenish partner, — after these tournaments are over, one would think that peace might reign; but the King-bird’s life is mostly passed in guerilla warfare with every bird that ventures too near, even if it be a Crow, Hawk or Owl, many times its superior in all things excepting audacity. Brooking no intrusion or division of kingdom, the courageous bird deserves its title, and by right of conquest wears the insignia of royalty,—tyrant by name and nature, and literally crowned with fire, kindled in the alembic of an ardent heart. Being exclusively insectivorous, like all of its tribe, the King-bird must enter and leave New England with the appearance and disappearance of the winged hosts upon which it preys. Occasionally, an avant-courier is seen in April, and even by the middle of that month; but it is usually the first or second week in May when the dashing bird begins to sound shrill challenge and display its flaming crest, with defiant shaking of its feathery lance. Great numbers press after; the quota is soon filled; and no sooner is the migration finished than pairing and nest- ing commence with all the pomp and circumstance I have described. The fabric is generally completed by the first of June; and the situations chosen for the nest are such that few specimens of bird-architecture are more exposed to public view. It is usually placed in an’ TYRANNUS CAROLINENSIS: KING-BIRD. 17 orchard or garden, or by the wayside, on a horizontal bough or fork at a moderate distance from the ground, and being bulky as well as openly situated, is as easily found as that of a Robin. It is ragged and loose exteriorly, but well cupped and brimmed, and may consist of twigs, weedstalks, grasses, rootlets, leaves, moss and plant down, with or without hair-lining,—the soft, fluffy substance being matted or felted together in an ingenious manner. The eggs are usually four or five in number, and very handsomely colored, being rich creamy-white, artistically spotted and blotched with dark brown, light reddish- brown, and lilac, chiefly in large bold pattern, the mark- ings themselves sharp-edged and distinct, as well as so heavy in color. The eggs are consequently not likely to be mistaken for those of any other bird. They measure about 1.00X0.75, being thus quite rotund: but there is the usual variation in size and shape. If one would realize the courage and pug- nacity of this redoubtable bird, he has only to offer to molest the freighted nest, and see with what vigor and persistence—with what outcry and at what risk of danger the threatened invasion will be resisted, even if ineffectually, by the devoted and determined parents. But if no such misfortune happens, the brood is safely hatched and reared; and then one of the most pleasing aspects of the King-bird’s life is witnessed in the zealous assiduity with which the young are encouraged to leave the nest and taught to use their tremulous wings. These duties and pleasures continue through the greater part of the summer, and then there is a little period of com- parative quiet in the camp before young and old alike, with the failure of their supply of insect food, make off for the South during the latter part of September. 18 TYRANNIDH: FLYCATCHERS. GREAT CRESTED FLYCATCHER. Myrarcuus crinitus (L.) Cad. Chars. Head crested, but no colored crown-patch; no primaries emarginate. Upper parts olivaceous ; throat and fore-breast pure ash; other under parts bright yellow; primaries conspicuously edged with chestnut; tail feathers dusky, with nearly the whole inner webs chestnut; bill blackish; feet black. Length 8.50- g.00 ; extent, 13.00-13.50; wing and tail, each, about 4.00; bill and tarsus, each, about 0.75. It is not easy to outline the dis- tribution of this bird in New Eng- land with a firm hand, or in few words to indicate clearly the man- ner of its occur- rence. Though the records are numerous, they are far from coin- cident, and often conflicting. The species belongs to a thoroughly tropical genus, Fic. 3.— Generic details of smaller Flycatchers: a, having numerous Myiarchus ; b, Sayiornis; ce, Contopus; a, Empido- species in Central mare and South Amer- ica, but only one which occurs in the United States at large. If, therefore, it were a bird of migration MYIARCHUS CRINITUS : CRESTED FLYCATCHER. 19 and distribution so regular as to characterize certain faunal areas, we should expect it to be represented equally and numerously in southern New England, and sparingly or irregularly further north. As a fact, how- ever, it appears to be nowhere very abundant, and yet to be dispersed with what may be called “regular irreg- ularity” in.all the six New England States—its dis- tribution being according to locality without special reference to latitude. Again, there is something capri- cious as well as fortuitous in its movements—for its numbers seem to increase or diminish in particular localities in different years, and it may even disappear entirely from places where it had formerly been observed, or be seen some years in other regions where there had been no previous records of its appearance. To sum the case in few words, we may say that this Flycatcher is locally distributed in nearly all New England, but by no means throughout that country; and that in most places where found at all it is rather a rare bird. It is of course only a summer visitor; it arrives early in May, and de- parts usually before the end of September. Though Nuttall spoke of the Crested Flycatcher as nearly unknown in New England, and Linsley men- tioned the only individual he ever saw in Connecticut, Mr. Merriam says that now it is certainly a really com- mon bird in the southern part of that State at least; adding that we must remember that Nuttall and Linsley were probably not familiar with its characteristic— almost diagnostic—note. “My experience with the bird,” he states, “has been, that it is rarely seen, unless, guided by its note, it is persistently followed up; and even then, one is almost at his wit’s end to get a shot, so well does the bird keep concealed amongst the foliage.” In fur- 20 TYRANNIDZ : FLYCATCHERS. ther evidence of the manner of the bird’s presence in Connecticut, I will quote again from Mr. Merriam: “ Mr. W. W. Coe, who early became familiar with the note of this species, tells me it has been a common bird in the vicinity of Portland, Conn., for at least fifteen years — ever since he commenced collecting birds. Prof. William D. Whitney, of New Haven, informs me that he has known the bird for at least thirty years, and that he has always regarded it as common. His observations extend over portions of Massachusetts (about Northampton), as well as Connecticut. Mr. J: N. Clark, of Saybrook, Conn., says that it was not rare, about the mouth of the Connecticut, twenty-five years ago; and Dr. Wm. Wood, of East Windsor Hill, Conn., tells me that it has bred regularly, and has not been uncommon in that vicinity for the last twenty-five or thirty years.” (B. Conn, 1877, p. 52.) In Dr. Coues’ List of the Birds of New England, the species is noted as a “summer visitant; rather rare” (Pr. Essex Inst., v, 1868, p. 264). Dr. Brewer’s Cata- logue says, “rare summer resident” (Pr. Bost. Soc., xvii, 1875, p. 443). Mr. Allen’s Massachusetts list mentions the bird in identical terms (Bull. Essex Inst., x, 1878, p. 19). “The birds reach Massachusetts,” says Mr. Minot, “about the middle of May, and ordinarily remain there four months” (B. N. E., 1877, p. 275). In Maine, both Mr. Verrill and Mr. Boardman give the species as rare, the one at Norway, the other at Calais. Mr. Brewster has latterly found it a regular summer visitor to the Um- bagog Lake region, where it was not ascertained to occur in 1871. In Vermont, Mr. C. S. Paine has found it about Randolph. In the region about Hamilton, Canada West, it is noted by Mr. T. MclIlwraith to be a MYIARCHUS CRINITUS?: CRESTED FLYCATCHER. 21 common summer resident. An extension of the bird’s range of late years has been observed by Mr. Merriam, who, referring to some remarks by Mr. T. M. Trippe on the irregular migrations of birds (Am. Nat., vii, 1873, p. 390), records a parallel case, in the instance of this very species occurring in Lewis County, northern New- York. “There, prior to the year 1870, they were un- known, at least so far as I can ascertain, and it is safe to say that they were extremely rare. In 1870, my cousin, Mr. C. L. Bagg, shot one specimen, the first we had ever seen. During the next season I shot a pair. I was away from home in 1872, but Mr. Bagg informs me that he took several Great Crested Flycatchers that year, and that they were quite common. In August, 1873, I shot eight in about an hour’s time, and since then they have been one of our commonest species, breeding abundantly in the tall maple and birch forests, where their characteristic, but rather harsh cry, may be heard at any hour of the day throughout the entire season.” (B. Conn., 1877, p. 51.) While it is scarcely needful to multiply citations in the case of so generally if irregularly distributed a species, the reader may be referred to the results of Mr. H. A. Purdie’s observations, in Am. Nat., vii, 1873, p. 692; and Bull. Nutt. Club, i, 1876, p. 73; ii, 1877, p. 16; as well as to those of Mr. R. T. Morris, in Forest and Stream of May 14, 1874, p. 213; of Mr. F. W. Hall, in the same paper, of Dec. 3, 1874, p. 261; and of “G. G. H. Jr.,” also in the same paper, Aug. 23, 1877, p. 44. Comparatively few persons are familiar with the habits of this bird, as it is not one which courts the society of man, but prefers to keep aloof in the depths of the forest, where it leads a wild, shy, and solitary life. It may be 22 TYRANNIDZ : FLYCATCHERS. recognized by its singular notes—one a harsh, explosive outcry of one syllable, pitched in a high key, and others sounded in guttural tone two or three times — all sug- gestive of the bird’s irritable and impulsive nature. It keeps for the most part high up among the trees, where it may be observed perched on the end of a dead branch in the attitude so characteristic of its tribe — with drooping or swaying tail and listless air—to be ex- changed in an instant, however, for quick and spirited action, should anything excite its attention, or provoke its anger. It is an extremely pugnacious bird, and the combats of the males in the breeding season are almost incessant. Its forays for passing insects are executed with great verve and adroitness, and at other times the bird may be seen dashing at a high rate of speed through the tree-tops. Under any excitement the crest is erected, and the wings are held quivering in readiness for instant action. Our Flycatchers are without exception distinguished by some peculiarity of nidification, and the nesting of the present species is in a manner quite its own. It builds in the hollows of trees, and the cast skins of snakes are almost invariably found among the materials which com- pose the nest. Post-holes, and even artificial retreats, such as Blue-bird or Martin boxes, are sometimes occu- pied. The eggs, four or five in number, measuring about 0.85 by 0.62, are unique in pattern of coloration, of which it is difficult to give an adequate description. Upona buff or rich clay-colored ground are drawn lengthwise numberless markings of dark purplish-chestnut, or pur- plish-chocolate, mixed with others of a paler and more lilaceous tint —these markings being mostly of a peculiar sharp, scratchy character, as if done with a fine pen. At SAYIORNIS FUSCA: PEWEE; PHCEBE-BIRD. 23 the greater end of the egg the tracery becomes more expansive and somewhat confluent, but the scratches, which cover the whole surface, are for the most part distinct; they mostly preserve their longitudinal char- acter, but in some specimens they run in every direction. This remarkable style of egg obtains in all the North American species of the genus, and may be as truly a generic character as is any one of those derived from the birds themselves. It would not be surprising to learn that it is related to some peculiarity of the minute anatomy of the oviduct. PEWEE; PEWIT; PHC:BE-BIRD. SAYIORNIS FUSCA (Gi.) Bd. Chars. Head sub-crested, without colored crown-patch, and no primaries emarginate. Above, dull olive-brown, becoming quite blackish on the head ; below, soiled whitish or very pale yellow, brightest on the belly and under tail coverts, shaded on the breast and sides with grayish-brown. Wings and tail dusky ; the outer tail feathers and inner secondaries edged with whitish ; a whitish eye-ring; bill, eyes and feet, black. Late summer specimens, in worn plumage, are quite dull and dingy. Autumnal birds are brighter-colored than in spring. Very young birds have rusty edgings of the feathers, especially those of the wings and tail. Length, 6.75-7.25; extent, 11.00-11.75; wing, 3.25- 3.50; tail, about the same, emarginate; bill, 0.50-0.55, little depressed, not so broad for its length, or so much flattened, as in Contopus and Empidonax, its lateral outlines straight ; tarsus equalling or exceeding the middle toe and claw, these together, about 1.33; point of wing formed by the second-fifth quill, third and fourth usually a little the longest ; first shorter than sixth. Having left the larger Flycatchers, we enter with this species upon the “little tyrants” —Tyrannulas, as they 24 TYRANNIDA: FLYCATCHERS, used to be called: small olivaceous Flycatchers, without very strong distinctive coloration, or any bright tints whatever. The present, though the only one of its genus in New England, and well marked in the char- acters above given, requires careful discrimination, in the hands of the novice, from any of the species of Contopus or Empidonax. Closely related, however, as it is to these in physical characters, it differs so much in habits, in notes, in nesting, and almost every particular of its life-history, as to-make in our bird-life quite a figure of its own. It is a summer visitor to New England, like all the family; but it comes earlier and lingers later than any other, being found in seasons so unpropitious that one wonders where it finds the necessary supply of insect food; and in fact at some seasons berries form a part of its food. It is one of the very first birds to presage the opening year,—the very harbinger of spring. Before that season is crowned, the bird is on the alert, and its sharp, querulous “‘pewst—fewzt”’ seems to complain impatiently of the tardy march of nature forth from bondage into freedom. An occasional Phoebe-bird may appear even in February; some come by the middle of March; by the end of that month there are plenty, and it is well through October before the loitering hosts have disappeared. For the greater part of the year, therefore, Pewits make their homes in New England; they are common, in most places abundant, and not restricted by latitude in their distribution ; and being also very famil- iar birds, are among those best known to all classes. Civilization has effected in this case the same change in the nest-building of a bird that has resulted in the more conspicuous instance of the Swallows, by affording SAYIORNIS FUSCA: PEWEE; PHCEBE-BIRD. 25 artificial nesting sites so convenient that the bird habitu- ally avails itself of these facilities. The original “typical” situation is the side of an upright rock, usually over water, and often itself dripping; the nest being affixed either to the open face of the stone, or beneath a projecting shelf, or in a cranny or retiring angle. Other sites frequently selected are the sides of earthen embank- ments or cuts, such as a Bank Swallow or Kingfisher might burrow in; or the roots of upturned trees, with plenty of earth clinging to them. The eaves and rafters of buildings now furnish the usual substitutes. The nest resembles a fourth of a sphere, applied by a vertical flat surface to the support, with another surface horizontal and hollowed out—the curved contour being somewhat elongated downward. The nest is built, like that of the Barn Swallow, of mixed mud and vegetable substances, but is much neater and more compact; moss usually enters largely into its composition, and those nests which are placed on wet rocks near the water, in the cool, moist, shady nooks the bird loves so well, are often composed chiefly of moss and mud, which may be artistically stuccoed with lichens. Two and even three broods may be reared under favorable conditions in one season. The first set of eggs is usually completed early in May, and another some time in June. The eggs are ordinarily four or five in number, measuring about 0.70 X 0.52; they are normally pure white and unmarked, though in some cases sprinkled with a few dots. The attachment of the Pewit to particular places is a marked trait. A pair will return year,after year to re-occupy the same home in preference to any other equally eligible nesting site ; and their perseverance in building under the most discouraging circumstances is no less remarkable. 26 TYRANNIDA : FLYCATCHERS. OLIVE-SIDED FLYCATCHER. CoONTOPUS BOREALIS (Sw.) Bd. Chars. Head sub-crested; feet extremely small; tarsus shorter than middle toe and claw; pointed wings much longer than the emarginate tail. Length, 7.00-8.00; wing, 3.90-4.30; tail about 3.00; tarsus, middle toe and claw, together, only about 1.25; bill, 0.66-0.75. Dark olive-brown, usually darkest on the crown, and palest on the sides; chin, throat, belly, under tail-coverts, and middle line of breast, white, or whitish ; wings and tail black- ish, with whitish edging of the inner quills ; upper mandible and feet black. The olive-brown of the under parts has a peculiar streaky appearance; there is a tuft of fluffy white feathers on the flank. This is much the largest of the olivaceous Flycatchers, nearly equalling a AZyzarchus in dimensions; but its form is strictly that of the Wood Pewee. Though not charac- teristic of any faunal area, it is more abundant in the Canadian than in the Alleghanian, and in the breeding season quite rare in the Carolinian; that is to say, it grows more and more numerous in summer as we pro- ceed northward in New England. Thus, for Connecticut, Mr. Merriam furnished in 1877 the first record subsequent to the doubtful one made in 1843 by Linsley: “ Rare; probably a few breed in the more northern and _ hilly parts of the state, as they are known to do in Massa- chusetts. On the 18th of October, 1875, attracted by its characteristic note, which is a short whistle, resem- bling the syllables o-wheo, o-wheo, o-wheo, uttered several times in succession, with the voice falling on the last a, I caught a momentary glimpse of one, perched on the top of a tall tree; but the bird was very shy, and I did not succeed in getting a shot. Mr. Erwin I. Shores CONTOPUS BOREALIS: OLIVE-SIDED FLYCATCHER. 27 writes me that he took a male at Suffield, Conn., Aug. 8, 1874. This is strong evidence of their breed- ing in the hills about that portion of the state, for mi- grants would hardly appear in Connecticut during the Jjirst of August.” (B. Conn., 1877, p. 53. See also his notes in Am. Nat., vii, 1873, p. 750, and viii, 1874, p. 309; also R. Deane’s, 2é2d@, p. 308.) The Connecticut record being thus so meagre, the time of the entry of this migratory bird into New England cannot be given with precision. It is one of the later arrivals, however, ap- parently not reaching Massachusetts before the second week in May, and leaving its summer resorts rather early in September. In that state, different observers have called it a “rare summer resident,” a ‘“‘ rather uncommon summer resident,” “neither rare nor common,” and “quite common,” according to different localities and circumstances of observation. It is marked as “quite common and breeding” at Umbagog Lake, in Maine, by Messrs. Maynard and Brewster, and Mr. G. A. Boardman speaks of its “abundance” some seasons in the vicinity of Calais, in the latter state. We also have records to cor- responding effect from Vermont and New Hampshire. The Olive-sided Flycatcher is confined to no particu- lar kind of ground, but may be observed in orchards and gardens, or groves of evergreen trees, as well as in the depths of pine forests. In Massachusetts, it is partial to pitch pine groves, especially during the breeding season. Wherever found it is likely to become a con- spicuous object from its habit of perching in exposed situations upon the ends of dead limbs, or blasted tree- tops, whence it utters its loud characteristic notes and makes its spirited sallies after passing insects, return- ing to the same post of observation. Nesting is essen- 28 TYRANNIDA : FLYCATCHERS. tially similar to that of the Wood Pewee, the structure being saddled on a horizontal limb, or fixed in a fork, often at a great height from the ground. The nest isa shallow, saucer-like fabric of twigs, rootlets, weed-stalks, bark-strips and other similar material, rather loosely put together. The very handsome eggs are of a pure creamy white, speckled with brown or reddish and lilaceous shades ; they are four or three in number, measuring about 0.85 x0.65, and are laid from the last week in May, as in Massachusetts, to middle of June in Maine. WOOD PEWEE. ConToPUS VIRENS (L.) Cad. Chars. With the form and proportions of the last species, but much smaller. Length, 6.00-6.50; wing, 3.25-3.50; tail, 2.75- 3.00; tarsus, middle toe and claw, together, scarcely or not 1.00; tarsus alone, about 0.50, thus no longer than the bill; no evident white tuft on the flank; head sub-crested, with erectile feathers. Olive-brown, rather darker on the head; sides with a paler shade of the same, reaching nearly or quite across the breast; the throat and belly whitish, more or less tinged with yellowish ; under tail-coverts the same, usually streaked with dusky; tail and wings blackish, the secondaries and coverts edged and tipped with whitish ; feet and upper mandible black ; under mandible usually yellow, sometimes dusky. In numbers according to latitudinal distribution the well-known Wood Pewee presents the reverse state of the case just outlined for the Olive-sided Flycatcher, being most abundant in southern New England, and gradually becoming less numerous as we proceed northward. Nevertheless, it is one of New England’s very com- CONTOPUS VIRENS: WOOD PEWEE. 29 mon birds, and inhabits all of the country. As its name indicates, it is partial to forests, and on the whole is of a retiring and unfamiliar disposition, though far from shy, and often surrendering the pleasures of solitude for those of society in the orchard or garden. Wherever it may fix its home, whether in the seclusion of sylvan retreats or in the vicinity of man’s abode, its presence is soon made known by its oft-repeated melancholy notes, seem- ing to speak some settled sorrow that time can never heal. The sighing of the pines is not more express- ive of mournful fancies than the sobbing of the little sombre-colored bird, flitting apparently inconsolable through their shades. But we need not be moved to pity by the anatomical configuration of a bird’s wind- pipe. Let us stick to science, and leave the sham of things to poets. The Pewee is a very practical and doubtless happy bird, brimful of active energy, con- stantly exhibited in the forays it makes after winged in- sects that venture too near its perch, and in the nervous way the wings flutter before and after these spirited ex- cursions, while the lengthened feathers of the crown are alternately erected and depressed: with the changing mood of the irritable creature. Quite the opposite of its relative the Phcebe-bird, the Wood Pewee is a loiterer by the way in spring; though it seems in no particular haste to depart with the waning season. It is in fact one of the latest arrivals among our summer guests— very fashionable in this respect. It scarcely enters Connecticut before the middle of May, and is not generally dispersed over the country before June. The return movement may begin early in Sep- tember, in more northerly sections, but is not completed till the end of that month. Nesting is correspondingly 30 TYRANNIDZ : FLYCATCHERS. delayed, the average time being not before the middle of June. The nest is very pretty —a flat, compact, circular structure, with thick walls and well-turned brim, but very thin flooring, closely saddled on a horizontal bough, or set in a forked twig. It is neatly finished on the outside with lichens, like that of the Blue-gray Gnatcatcher or Humming-bird, so as to be effectually concealed from casual search by its resemblance to a natural excrescence of the limb. The principal materials are fine grasses, slender bark-strips and rootlets, circularly disposed, and often fastened with silky or cottony threads. The pre- cise structure of its nest will vary, of course, according to the site selected: the saddled nests being scarcely more than walls of which the bough itself furnishes the basement; while nests in forks are furnished with more substantial flooring. The elevation above the ground is another variable element, being sometimes only ten or twelve feet, while in other (and more usual) cases the birds build high up in tall trees. Under any circum- stances, however, the nest may be recognized by its shallowness, with its thick, compact, lichen-stuccoed walls, and its spotted, creamy eggs. The eggs, to the usual number of four or three, measuring about 0.70x 0.55, are creamy white, blotched with the usual shades of reddish and darker and more lilaceous brown, the markings being often wreathed about the larger end. Notwithstanding the procrastination of the bird in build- ing, more than one brood may be reared under favorable circumstances. EMPIDONAX ACADICUS: ACADIAN FLYCATCHER. 31 ACADIAN FLYCATCHER. EMPIDONAX ACADICUS (Gm.) Bad. Chars. Above, clear continuous olive-green, rather darker on the crown, where the feathers have dusky centres ; below, whitish, shaded with olive on sides and nearly across breast, washed with yellowish on belly, flanks, and under wing- and tail-coverts; wings dusky, the coverts tipped, and the secondaries edged with tawny yellow; tail dusky, glossed with olive; a yellowish eye-ring ; feet and upper mandible brown; under mandible pale. The largest of this genus. Length, 5.75-6.25; extent about 9.50; wing, 2.75-3.00; tail, 2.50-2.75; bill, nearly or quite 0.50; tarsus, 0.66; middle toe and claw, 0.50; point of wing reaching nearly 1.00 beyond the secondaries ; 1st quill much longer than 6th. Notwithstanding the suggestive name, the “ Acadian” Flycatcher is scarcely a bird of New England, and much misunderstanding has resulted from reliance upon erro- neous records of its supposed occurrence in New Eng- land. It should be remembered that it is now scarcely more than twenty years since Prof. Baird first accurately distinguished the four eastern species of Lmpidonax, concerning which the greatest confusion and uncertainty had before obtained. Passing over all the earlier records which, whether having any basis of fact or not, are too indeterminate for use, we may note the steps by which we have reached the true state of the case. In the first general list of New England birds, Dr. Coues speaks of the Acadian Flycatcher in the following terms :— “Summer resident. Not abundant. This species seems to be more restricted in its northern range than the others of the genus, apparently not proceeding much farther than Massachusetts. It is not, I believe, recorded 32 TYRANNID# : FLYCATCHERS, from Maine. But Mr. Samuels erroneously omits it from his Massachusetts list. Earlier authors speak of it as being very common, but so far as I can learn it is quite rare. At Washington, D.C., it is by far the most abun- dant species of the genus.” (Pr. Essex Inst., v, 1868, p. 264). This is an inkling of the truth, in recognizing the re- stricted southerly habitat of the bird in comparison with its congeners, and would appear to be well-founded, view- ing the many New England records upon which it was based; among them that of so careful and reliable an observer as Mr. Allen, who had confidently attributed the species to Massachusetts (Pr. Essex Inst., iv, 1864, p. 54). The uncertainty of the case was soon after remarked by Dr. Brewer (Am. Nat., i, 1867, p. 119), who later communicated to Dr. Coues a note on the subject, which was published in the Birds of the North- west. “J do not think the bird occurs in New England, even in the Connecticut Valley, and believe that Mr. Allen has mixed it up with ¢raz//z. T have myself no evidence of its breeding northeast of Philadelphia; but it is shy and retiring in its habits, and would readily escape notice, so that its presence in New Jersey, New York, and New England may not be uncommon, and yet we not know it.” (B. N. W., 1874, p. 251.) In the same work (p. 250) it is stated that the bird “remains to be detected in New England.” Dr. Brewer, therefore, very properly expunged the species from his catalogue of 1875, with the following statement: “Mr. Allen in- forms me that the species found in western Massachu- setts, and included by him in the list as the Acadian Flycatcher, is really Emp. Trazllit. This leaves us without any evidence of the occurrence of the species, EMPIDONAX ACADICUS: ACADIAN FLYCATCHER. 33 and I have therefore taken it from the list” (Pr. Bost. Soc., xvii, 1875, p. 452). In 1876, in a paper “on two Empidonaces, traillii and acadicus”’ (Bull. Nutt. Club, i, 1876, pp. 14-17), the sub- ject was well handled by Mr. Henshaw, with special reference to the differences between the species named in geographical distribution, nesting, and eggs. Then, after it had been made out to every one’s satisfaction that the bird had never been known to occur in New England, the claim of this characteristic com- ponent of the Carolinian fauna to a place among the birds of New England was immediately proven by Mr. C. H. Merriam, who marked it in his list as “a rare summer visitant from the middle states,” add- ing that “it may breed in the Connecticut Valley” as is doubtless the case. ‘It affords me great pleas- ure,” he continues, “to be able, through the kind- ness of Mr. Erwin I. Shores, to replace this species among the birds of New England. As is well known, it was formerly included in [nearly] all New England lists, but, as shown by Dr. Coues, Mr. H. W. Henshaw, and others, the records were founded on erroneous iden- tifications — the bird having been mistaken for Z. mznz- mus or Trailliz, generally the former. . . . Hence it was with a peculiar sense of gratification that I received, a few days since, an unmistakable example of the species, from Mr. Shores, who relates that he shot it in ‘ Suffield, Conn., June 24th, 1874, in a piece of woods known as Beech Swamp.’ For the benefit of those who may not be disposed to accept my identification in so important a matter, and to avoid all possibility of mistake, I at once sent the bird to my friend, Mr. Robert Ridgway, of the Smithsonian Institute, and he pronounces it to be a 34 TYRANNIDA : FLYCATCHERS. typical £. acadicus.” (B. Conn., 1877, p. 58.) This species was soon after restored to its rightful place by Dr. Brewer (Pr. Bost. Soc., xix, 1878, p. 306). Dr. Brewer states that the nest of the Acadian Fly- catcher “is generally placed on a drooping limb of a beech or dogwood tree, at a height of from six to ten feet from the ground. It is never saddled ona limb like that of a Wood Pewee, neither is it pensile like that of the Vireos, but is built in the fork of a small limb, and _ securely fastened thereto by a strip of bark. The nest itself is mostly made of fine strips of bark or weed stalks, woven together without much care as to neatness or strength, and so slight is the structure that you may often count the eggs in the nest from below. Occasion- ally the bird constructs its nest of the blossoms of the hickory-tree, and when thus made, it is very neat and pretty.” (Hist. N. A. Birds, ii, 1874, p. 376.) Mr. Henshaw’s article compares the nest with that of E. trailld: to find a very striking difference. “It isa slight structure made of fine grasses, interspersed more or less with the blossoms of trees, the whole disposed in a cir- cular form and fitted between two twigs ; a firm support is derived from a binding of spiders’ webs, which are interwoven with the sides of the nest, and then carried over the twigs on either side, encircling them with strong bands. The entire base of the nest is without support, and so thin is the slight structure that the eggs might almost be seen from below. It was built in a small tree, perhaps twenty feet from the ground. In this respect the two species vary but little, both preferring to select the lower branches of tree or shrub for their domicile, and only rarely departing from the rule.” (Bull. Nutt. Club, i, 1876, p. 16.) EMPIDONAX ACADICUS: ACADIAN FLYCATCHER. 35 This account of the decided peculiarity of the nest is endorsed by Dr. Coues, upon examination of specimens sent to him from Missouri. “Two nests of this species are strikingly different from those of ¢vaz// in structure, in materials, and in position. They appear to have been taken from long, slender horizontal branchlets, in the horizontal forks of which they rest. They are shallow nests,—in fact, rather saucer-like than cupped-shape, some three and a half inches across outside by less than two inches in depth, the cavity over two inches across the brim, by scarcely one inch in depth. They are very light, ‘ open-work’ structures, so thinly floored that the eggs may have been visible to one looking up from below; and the walls, though more compact, still let daylight through on all sides. These nests, in short, may be compared to light hammocks swung between forks. Each is composed almost entirely of long walnut aments, which, drooping in slender sprays from all sides, give a tasteful, airy effect to these pretty structures. There is a slight lining in each case of slender grass- stems and still finer rootlets, loosely interlaid in every direction on the bottom, rather circularly disposed around the brim. These specimens were taken June 13 and 18, 1879, in hickory woods, at altitudes of ten and fifteen feet.” (Bull. Nutt. Club, v, 1880, p. 23.) According to the same authority the eggs of acadicus are so similar to those of ¢raz//z that no one should pre- sume to tell them apart with any show of confidence. They are said to be only three in number. Dr. Coues also gives the following rules for distinguishing the four eastern species of the genus, when site and structure of nests and character of eggs are together taken into con- sideration :— 36 TYRANNIDA } FLYCATCHERS. £. acadicus. Nest in trees, in horizontal forks, thin, saucer-shaped, open-worked; eggs creamy white, boldly spotted. E. trailli, Nest in trees, in upright crotch, thick, deeply cupped, more or less compact walled; eggs creamy white, boldly spotted. £. minimus. Nest in trees, in upright crotch, deeply cupped, compact walled; eggs immaculate white. £. flaviventris. Nest on ground or near it, deeply cupped, thick and bulky; eggs white, spotted. TRAILL’S FLYCATCHER. EMPIDONAX TRAILLI (Aud.) Bad. Chars. Above, olive-brown, lighter and duller brownish posteriorly, darker on the head; below, nearly as in acadicus, but darker, the olive-gray shading quite across the breast; wing-markings gray- ish-white, with slightly yellowish or tawny shade; under mandible pale; upper mandible and feet black. Rather smaller than aca- dicus. Length, 5.50-6.00; extent, 8.50-9.50; wing, 2.65-2.80; its tip only reaching abont 0.66 beyond the secondaries ; tail, 2.50; tarsus, 0.66; middle toe and claw, 0.60. Traill’s Flycatcher is a common bird of Southern New England, in suitable localities, during the migrations, which take place in May and September. It is found chiefly in thickets, copses, and low wet woodland, where it may be recognized by one having a good ear for such things by its peculiar note, likened by Mr. May- nard to the syllables ewzzk', not so quickly uttered, and therefore quite different from the abrupt chebec', or sewzc', of the more abundant and more generally diffused Least Flycatcher. Others syllabify the note by EMPIDONAX TRAILLI: TRAILL’S FLYCATCHER. 37 pretty-dear, with accent on the de. The bird appears to be quite rare in some sections, particularly Eastern Mas- sachusetts, where £. mznzmus is the chief representative of the genus. According to Mr. Merriam, it is in Con- necticut a common summer resident, arriving early in May and frequenting swampy localities, where it breeds (B. Conn., 1877, p. 58). This may be so; but the diffi- culty of distinguishing the little Flycatchers is well- known, and Mr. Purdie writes me that he thinks there must be some mistake about the bird’s breeding in Connecticut. For even though Flycatcher nests “like those of the Indigo-bird’’ have been found in north- western Massachusetts, the distribution of Traill’s Fly- catcher in the breeding season is no less characteristic of the Canadian Fauna than is that of several species which have been used to indicate the difference between that Fauna and the Alleghanian. According to Mr. Henshaw (Bull. Nutt. Club, i, 1874, p. 15), the nest of Traill’s Flycatcher may be compared fairly with the usual style of the Summer Warbler, so well known to every one, “but lacks something of the compactness and neatness shown by this species in weaving together the materials that make up its home. Hempen fibres compose the exterior, or the bulk of the nest, while internally it is lined in true Flycatcher style with fine grasses, and a slight admixture of down from thistles ; the main point of all, however, is its position with regard to the branches. It is built into an upright fork, the small twigs that surround it being made available to secure it more firmly in its place by being encircled with the stringy fibres. In this particular of position correspond all the nests of this bird I have seen, as well as those of pusillus in the West.” As Mr. Widmann has observed, 38 TYRANNIDA : FLYCATCHERS, “upright fork” in this case does not necessarily mean an upright branch, for the limb itself may be horizontal, or even drooping ; when the nest will be found fastened to twigs which spring up and form a perfect crotch. Several nests, sent from Missouri by Mr. Widmann to Dr. Coues, are thus described by the latter: ‘The situation, materials, and whole style of architecture of these three nests are different from those of acadicus, and are identical with those of £. minimus (eggs of which latter are pure white, unmarked), They are built in each case on a stouter bough, in the upright crotch formed by two or several twigs springing up from the main stem ; very compact, thick-walled and deeply- cupped structures, let firmly down into the crotch, —the twigs either grooving the walls, as in one instance, or embedded into the substance of the nest, as in the other two cases. The outside diameter is nearly or about three inches, while the depth in one case is quite as much, but in the other two about half an inch less. The cavity is scarcely or about two inches, with a depth of fully one and a half inches, so deeply cupped are these structures. These nests are stoutly built of slender grasses, rootlets, and a variety of bleached vegetable substances disintegrated beyond recognition. Two are lined with very fine grass-stems or rootlets; a third, with these and horse-hairs ; one has some bits of twine worked into the walls, and in another some large feathers, apparently from the poultry-yard, have been similarly used.” These nests were taken from an oak, an elm, and an ailanthus, at heights from six to eight feet, on June 14, 17 and 21; one contained three, another four eggs (Bull. Nutt. Club, v, 1880, p. 24). On the subject of these ¢raz//z nests from Missouri, Mr. Allen writes to Dr. EMPIDONAX TRAILLI: TRAILL’S FLYCATCHER. 39 Coues as follows: “I could not understand your com- parative diagnoses of nests of &. ¢vazlli and acadicus until Mr. Brewster showed me a series of nests of £. trailli from Ohio ; for in New England £. ¢vaz/éz builds an entirely different nest from what it does in Ohio and Missouri. The New England nests (Maine, New Hamp- shire and Vermont specimens) are scarcely distinguish- able from the ordinary nest of Cyanospiza cyanea, and consequently suggest no comparison with the nest of E. minimus, being bulky structures of coarse materials, which no one would think could belong to the species building the small, compact nests of soft materials that come to us from Ohio through Dr. J. M. Wheaton, or from Missouri through Mr. Widmann, such as you de- scribe. It seems to me also noteworthy that Z. ¢razllz breeds in the interior so much further south than it does in the Atlantic States; though noted as breeding spar- ingly as far south as Long Island, it rarely nests in New England south of the Canadian Fauna, or south of central or northern Maine, and corresponding points in Vermont and New Hampshire” (loc. cit., p. 25).* A similar account of the nesting of ¢rvaz//z in Maine is given by Mr. Purdie, who remarks upon the differences observed in the structure of the nest and its situation from such as Mr. Henshaw’s description indicates. “The nest,” he says, “is built between the upright shoots of low bushes, from one to five feet from the ground, and is loosely constructed of grasses throughout, including the lining. It is a much less compact nest * Consult also Pearsall and Bailey, “ The Country,” i, Apr. 20, 1878, p. 371; Purdie, ibid., ii, Apr. 27, 1878, p. 9, and May 4, p. 25; Forest and Stream, x, Apr. 25, 1878, p. 216 ; May 9, 1878, p. 255. 40 TYRANNIDZ: FLYCATCHERS. even than that of the Indigo Bird, though perhaps smaller in the average” (Bull. Nutt. Club, i, 1876, p. 75). But with whatever variation in degree of compactness and in materials, the structure is still always a deep cup placed in an upright fork, thus essentially like that of mintmus, and quite different from that either of aca- dicus or of a Wood Pewee. The eggs, however, resem- ble those of the Pewee, and especially of the Acadian Flycatcher, in being creamy white and in being boldly spotted. The markings are of different shades of brown, chiefly at or about the larger end of theeggs. The eggs are three or four in number, measuring about 0.64 X0.55. The tendency in New England seems to be for the bird to build quite low down in bushes, rather than in trees, and in watery situations, such as alder thick- ets or their vicinity. Mr. C. S. Paine, who seems to have found many nests in Vermont, speaks of them as placed in low alder bushes, three or four feet from the ground, near running streams. According to Mr. Brewster’s observations in New Hampshire and Maine, the bird’s “favorite haunts were the dense alder thickets along the rivers and small streams, over those dark retreats, perched on some tall dead branch, full in the rays of the noonday sun. The male sang vigorously, occasionally darting out after some insect, and returning to the same perch. His song consisted of a single dis- syllabic refrain, %e’-zwéng, uttered in a harsh, peevish tone, at an interval of about thirty seconds, varied occasionally to ke'-wink or ke'-winch. At each utterance his head is thrown upwards with a sudden jerk. They were retiring, but not shy ; were easily approached, and were apparently not so restless as most Flycatchers””’ (Hist. N. A. Birds, ii, 1874, p. 371). EMPIDONAX MINIMUS: LEAST FLYCATCHER, 41 LEAST FLYCATCHER. EMPIDONAX MINIMUS &d. Chars. Colors almost exactly as in ¢vazl/7,; usually olive-gray rather than olive-brown; whole anterior parts often slightly ashy ; wing-markings, eye-ring, and loral feathers plain grayish- white ; feet black ; under mandible usually dusky. Smaller than traillz, and not so stoutly built. Length, 4.80-5.50; extent, 7.40-8.30; wing, 2.60 or less; tail about 2.25; bill less than 0.50; point of wing reaching only about 0.50 beyond the sec- ondaries. In New England at large this little Flycatcher is the most abundant of all the species, characteristic of no special faunal area, but commonly and almost universally distributed. On the whole, however, it is more numer- ous in southern than in northern New England, and may be entirely wanting in some sections of the latter, where Traill’s and the Yellow-bellied are the princi- pal representatives. Compared with the other three, it is next to the most southerly—the Acadian scarcely reaching our boundaries, then the Least, so plentiful to Massachusetts and decreasing in num- bers northward—then Traill’s, reversing the regions of relative abundance —then the Yellow-bellied, not yet found breeding except in Maine. The Least Flycatcher enters Connecticut about the first of May, and soon be- comes abundant and generally dispersed in orchards, gardens, parks, and even in the heart of large cities, as well as in woodland anywhere else, thus not particularly affecting the swampy bushy places to which Traill’s habitually resorts. It may be known by circumstances of its local distribution, and by its readily recognized 42 TYRANNIDA : FLYCATCHERS. note, the peculiar chebec', cadet’, or sewick', of which the various New England writers speak. Remaining through the summer to breed, the little bird migrates southward in September, not entirely withdrawing until about the end of that month. The nests and eggs of the Least Flycatcher have been described with particularity’ by Dr. Coues, whose account (Birds Northwest, p. 255) is transcribed in sub- stance. The bird generally nests in a sapling or shrub, ten or twelve feet from the ground,—but sometimes scarcely more than a man’s height, and in other in- stances up to forty feet. The nest is placed in an up- right crotch formed by two or several twigs generally no thicker than one’s finger. In one case it was on the bending trunk of an elm, but rested, as usual, among a set of upright twigs. It is very deeply let down into the crotch, and usually bears their deep impressions. The female is so close a sitter, that sometimes she may almost be taken in hand before she deserts her charge ; and then she only flutters to a little distance and moves uneasily about, uttering a low mournful note. The nest is a neat little structure, with a basis of fine fibrous inner bark and decomposed substance of various weeds, matted with plant-down into a soft, warm, yet firm struct- ure, finished internally with a special lining of plant down, confined with a slight layer of horse-hair or the finest possible grass-tops. The frame of the nest is well finished and even, with circular disposition of the fibres composing it, while the lining material is inter- laced in all directions. These elegant structures vary in size from two and a half inches across outside and less than two in depth, to nearly three inches in both these dimensions. The cavity is large for the bulk of EMPIDONAX MINIMUS: LEAST FLYCATCHER. 43 the nest. The eggs are generally four in number, some- times only three; five were not found in any one of six nests examined. The average size of twenty specimens was 0.65 X0.50, with 0.68 X0.52 and 0.59X0.50 as the extremes of size and shape. They are pure white, and normally without any markings whatever ; but, as in the similar case of the Pewit Flycatcher, occasional eggs are found to be dotted. A case of this kind has been in- stanced by Mr. R. Hayward, who found a nest in an apple tree at Milton, Mass., containing three normal eggs, and one minutely dotted with reddish-brown, meas- uring 0.63Xo0.50. The identity of this nest is vouched for by Mr. Brewster: it was “like others of this species, and the bird had the well-known note of chebec.” (Bull. Nutt. Club, iv, 1879, p. 124.) The gradual influence of civilization, which may in time become as marked in the case of this species as it has in that of the Pewit, has been noted by Dr. Brewer with reference to the materials composing the nests. “ Those made on the edge of woodlands or in remote orchards are wrought almost entirely of fine deciduous bark, hempen fibres of vegetables, feathers, dried fragments of insect cocoons, and other miscellaneous materials felted or impacted together; within this is a lining of fine strips of vegetable bark, woody fibres, fine lichens and soft downy feathers. In some the lining is ex- clusively of fine pine leaves, in others with the seeds or pappus of compositaceous plants. Those made in the vicinity of dwellings indicate their neighborhood by the variety of miscellaneous and convenient materials, such as bits of paper, rags, cotton, wool, and the larger and more conspicuous feathers of the poultry-yard. Where taw cotton was abundantly provided, I have known this 44 TYRANNIDA: FLYCATCHERS. material, strengthened with a few straws and woody fibres, with a lining of feathers, constitute the whole substance of the nest.” And again, as to the increasing sociability of the birds themselves: “They are much addicted to particular localities, and return to the same spot year after year, if undisturbed. A pair that had established their hunting-grounds in an open area north of a dwelling in Roxbury returned to the same spot for several successive years, and would come regularly to the piazza of the house, where bits of cotton were ex- posed for the benefit of such of the whole feathered tribe as chose to avail themselves of it. Each year they drew nearer and nearer to the house, until at last the nest was made in a clump of honeysuckles on a corner of the piazza, whence they would sally forth in quest of insects, entirely unmindful of the presence of the family.” (Hist. N. A. Birds., ii, 1874, p. 373.) YELLOW-BELLIED FLYCATCHER. EMPIDONAX FLAVIVENTRIS &d. Chars. Above olive-green, clear, continuous and uniform, as in acadicus ; below decidedly yellow, bright and pure on the belly, shaded with olive on the breast and sides. Eye-ring, wing-markings, and under mandible yellow; feet black. Size of ¢railli or rather less ; feet proportioned as in acadicus ; bill shaped nearly as in szénzmus, but rather larger ; first quill usually equal to sixth. The Yellow-bellied is not so well-known in New Eng- land as either of the two foregoing, though the character implied in the name is very distinctive on comparison of E. FLAVIVENTRIS : YELLOW-BELLIED FLYCATCHER. 45 specimens. It appears to be rather uncommon, is chiefly seen during the migrations, and thus far is only known to breed in Maine. Reaching Connecticut about the middle of May, and to be found there till June, it passes on to its breeding grounds and returns in September. It doubtless withdraws entirely, as a rule, during that month, notwithstanding that specimens have been taken at dates so irregular as November 29 and December 1 (Bull. Nutt. Club, iii, 1878, p. ror). Mr. C. J. Maynard has apparently had more experience with the species than most observers have enjoyed. In his catalogue of Massachusetts birds he speaks of taking a dozen from May 31 to June 10, 1869, eight of them in a few hours on June r. “I do not doubt,” he says, “that it has oc- curred in previous seasons, but, being unaccustomed to its low note, — which is like the syllable fea, very plain- tively and prolongedly given, —and its retiring habits, I had not detected it before. The specimens captured were all,— with the exception of the first, which was shot in a tall oak,—taken in low swampy thickets.” In another place he adds that he found the bird in dark swamps at Upton, in Maine, where for the first time he heard any other note than the low fea, it was like the syllables £2//cc, very gravely given, with a long interval between each utterance, and much less energetic than the corresponding note of £. ¢vaz//z. Mr. Purdie endorses the fact that this £¢/-c note is not at all like the sound of Traill’s voice, but nearer that of the Least Flycatcher. “The pea,” he continues, in a letter to the editor, “which I consider to be the song of the species, is given in the style of the Wood Pewee, but is much fainter, and in one syllable instead of two or three, and repeated several times.” Although during the 46 TYRANNIDA : FLYCATCHERS. migration the birds may be dispersed in high or mixed woods, their preference for swamps becomes evident when we know their breeding habits, which may now engage our particular attention. It has proved no easy task to disentangle the history of this species from that of its two nearest relatives, con- sidering the conflicting or erroneous accounts which have crept into the books, resulting from wrong identification of nests or other mistakes. Thanks to several active and successful New England observers, the doubt has been dispelled, and the nest and eggs of flaviventris should be as recognizable as those of any other species. One of the most satisfactory accounts, which may be transcribed in part, is that given by Mr. Purdie in the Nuttall Bulletin for October, 1878, p. 166. Remarking that Dr. Brewer, and, following him, Dr. Coues, had described the eggs as white, unmarked, he notes his experiences with the bird at Houlton, Me. “Mr. Bradbury informed us that he had found, on June 15, a nest unknown to him, with one egg. On the 18th he conducted us to the edge of a wooded swamp, and pointing to the roots of an upturned tree, said the nest was there. We ap- proached cautiously and soon saw the structure, and then the sitting bird, which appeared to be sunken in a ball of green moss. Our eager eyes were within two feet of her, thus easily identifying the species, when she darted off; but, to make doubly sure, Mr. Deane shot her. There was no mistake; we at last had a genuine nest and eggs of the Yellow-bellied Flycatcher. A large dwelling it was for so small and trima bird. Built in and on to the black mud clinging to the roots, but two feet from the ground, the bulk of the nest was composed of dry moss, while the outside was faced with beautiful E, FLAVIVENTRIS : YELLOW-BELLIED FLYCATCHER. 47 fresh green mosses, thickest around the rim or parapet. The home of the Bridge Pewee (Sayornis fuscus) was at once suggested. But no mud entered into the actual composition of the nest, though at first we thought so, so much was clinging to it when removed. The lining was mainly of fine black rootlets, with a few pine-needies and grass-stems. The nest gives the following measure- ments: depth inside one and a half inches ; depth outside fouranda quarter inches ; circumference, inside, seven and a quarter inches. The eggs, four in number, were per- fectly fresh, rounded oval in shape, and of a beautiful rosy-white tint, well spotted with a light reddish shade of brown.” Mr. S. D. Osborne soon supplemented this excellent account (ibid., p. 187): “On Monday, June 10, 1878, while collecting in company with Mr. R. F. Pearsall, on the island of Grand Menan, I flushed a Yellow-bellied Flycatcher, which seemed to come from directly under my feet. The locality was a good-sized hummock of moss, in swampy ground at the edge of some low woods. For some time I was unable to find any signs of a nest, but finally I discovered a small hole one anda half inches in diameter in the side of the hummock, and on enlarg- ing this opening the nest, with four eggs, lay before me. The bird, which had all the time been hopping around within a few feet of our heads, was at once shot. The cavity extended in about two inches, was about four inches in depth, and was lined with a very few grasses, black hair-like roots, and skins of berries. The eggs, four in number, are white, with a very delicate creamy tint, which differed in its intensity in different specimens, and are spotted, mostly at the larger end, with a few dots and blotches of a light reddish shade.” About a year 48 TYRANNIDA: FLYCATCHERS., later Mr. Osborne discovered another nest in Oxford County, Me., in a similar situation, with four eggs well advanced in incubation on the 18th of June. “The nest was built in the side of a hummock of moss, under the roots of a small tree, and was only about half covered over, the eggs being clearly visible from the outside.” The eggs were also spotted. (Bull. Nutt. Club, iv., Oct. 1870, p. 240.) To place this matter of the lowly nesting and spotted eggs of the Yellow-bellied Flycatcher, by which it differs somewhat from all its eastern congeners, beyond all doubt for the future, I will sum the observations of a third independent observer who himself took two nests, making five in all here described. Mr. C. F. Batchelder’s first nest was taken June 14th, 1879, at Fort Fairfield, Me., in wet mixed woods. It was placed on the edge of a bank formed by a decayed tree trunk, over a pool, protected from view by some green moss growing upon a projecting root, and partly sunken in the surrounding moss. The materials were fine brown roots, bits of rotten wood, the scaly coverings of buds, apparently of the arbor vitz, together with a few sticks and withered leaves, and one or two bits of arbor vite and green moss; with fine black rootlets and withered grasses for lining. The outer diameter was four inches, the inner two and three eighths, with an outer depth of two anda quarter, and cavity one and a quarter deep. The four eggs were white, with a slight creamy tinge, spotted and blotched with two shades of light reddish-brown, mostly about the larger end; two of the eggs also having a few fine dashes and specks of black over the other markings. These four measured 0.68X0.52; 0.68X0.52; 066xX 0.51; 0660.51. The other nest, found June 27, E, FLAVIVENTRIS: YELLOW-BELLIED FLYCATCHER. 49 among a tangle of fallen trees, was situated about two feet from the ground on the side of a moss-covered stump, deeply sunken in the soft green moss, which covered it above, though the eggs were visible from the outside. It wasa bulky, compact mass of the same moss, with a few bits of arbor vite: and one or two sticks, thinly lined with grass-stems and rootlets; its outer diameter four and a quarter, depth four; inner diameter two, depth one and a half. The four nearly fresh eggs were precisely like those just described in ground-color and markings, but ran a trifle larger, the extremes being 0.67X0.51 to 0.70X0.54. (Bull. Nutt. Club, iv, 1870, p. 241.) It may be added that a sixth nest, taken by Mr. N. A. Eddy on an island in Penobscot Bay, June 13, 1880 was similarly circumstanced, and the eggs were not dif- ferent from those described above, though ranging a little less in size—not over 0.65X0.51. (Bull. Nutt. Club, v, 1880, p. 241.) 50 CAPRIMULGIDA : WHIPPOORWILLS ; NIGHT-HAWKS. FAMILY CAPRIMULGIDA. WHIPPOOR- WILLS AND NIGHT-HAWKS. WHIPPOORWILL. ANTROSTOMUS VOCIFERUS (Wils.) Bp. Chars. Mouth cleft to below the eyes, with minute horny part of the bill, and long bristles on each side. Feet very short and weak, unfitted for perching in the usual way. Inner edge of the middle claw dilated and comb-like. Wings little longer than the broad rounded tail ; plumage very soft and lax, like an owl’s, with blended and varied coloration: prevailing tone gray, varie- gated with black, white and tawny, in small streaky pattern or delicate marbling; lateral tail feathers tipped with white or tawny; a white or tawny collar on the throat. Length about 9.50; extent, 18.50; wing, 5.50; tail, 4.50; hind toe short, in- serted above the level of the rest, not directly posterior; front toes with movable webbing at base; outer toe with only four joints, instead of five, as usual in birds. The Whippoorwill, belonging to a family peculiar in many important respects, and of such singular habits and general appearance that superstitions no less dismal than ridiculous have attached to its mysterious manners, is a common summer resident throughout New England, arriving early in May, and becoming dispersed in suitable situations in the course of that month. The bird is noc- turnal in habits, and keeps so closely concealed in the day time that it is much oftener heard than seen, as par- ticularly when, the twilight deepening and lengthening shadows merging in the growing gloom, its strange cry rings out with startling effect from no one knows where. ANTROSTOMUS VOCIFERUS: WHIPPOORWILL. 51 The bird may be in the brush where it has hidden during the hours of light, or, on pinion as noiseless as that of an owl, it may have stolen close to the house —so close that the queer clicking sound which precedes its lugubrious salute may be distinctly heard. It may even drop unperceived upon the house-top, and cry out with sudden vehemence in the middle of the night, perhaps sending a shiver through those persons whose nervous organization is susceptible of impressions ominous or superstitious. Though wrong conclusions may be cor- rected by observation and experience — those unanswer- able pleaders in es ture to which all cases of the kind must be finally referred without possible appeal — it should not © lessen our interest in the birds capable of such weird effects; but rather awaken new and more intelligent cognitions of the beauty and harmony which nature’s every handiwork displays. No bird is more perfectly adapted to the part sustained in animated nature than the Whippoorwill, and not one can be presumed to more thoroughly enjoy life. It has a number of amiable and admirable traits, among which are its parental affection and devotion, and its conjugal fidelity. Though the young birds hatch covered with down, and thus like chickens or sandpipers, which are able to run about and feed themselves at birth, they are nevertheless as weak and helpless as the naked occupants of a spar- row’s nest, requiring assiduous attention on the part of Fic. 4. — WHIPPOORWILL. 52 CAPRIMULGIDZ : WHIPPOORWILLS ; NIGHT-HAWKS. the parents. We cannot endorse Mr. Minot’s statement that they “run about much like young partridges.” Only an apology for a nest is constructed—a slight hollow in the mould of a fallen log or stump, or on the ground among fallen leaves. The eggs are only two, this being the usual number laid by birds of this family. They are elliptical, and of delicately marbled and clouded coloration, like the plumage of the birds themselves. They measure about 1.25 X 0.85 of an inch, and are usually laid early in June, when the birds are in full cry. The clamor continues during the breeding season proper, after which the cry is seldom if ever heard; and this being the princi- pal indication of the birds’ presence, it is difficult to say at what precise time they depart, so silently and furtively do they slip away from our midst. The migration, how- ever, is probably accomplished in September. Like the rest of this family, the Whippoorwill is insectivorous ; and numberless are the crepuscular and nocturnal insects which fall into its capacious mouth, as into the wide open jaws of a trap beset with stiff bristles to control the struggles of the bird’s unhappy victims. NIGHT-HAWK OR BULL-BAT. CHORDEDILES POPETUE (V1) Bd. Chars. Similar in general to a Whippoorwill; no long bristles about mouth. Wings long and pointed, much exceeding the forked tail; plumage more smooth and compact. Upper parts blackish, mottled with brown, gray and tawny; under parts from the breast white, barred crosswise with blackish and tawny. Throat with a crescentic bar, white in the male, tawny in the CHORDEDILES POPETUE: NIGHT-HAWK OR BULL-BAT. 53 female. Tail blackish, marbled with several pale cross-bars, and in the male with large white spaces near the ends of the feathers. Long quills of the wing blackish, with a great white spot on five outer primaries midway between their bases and tips; in the female this mark smaller or not pure white. Length about 9.00 ; extent, 22.00; wing, 8.00; tail, 5.00; bill about 0.25 in its hard part, but with immense gape reaching below the eyes. This remarkable bird is a common summer resident in New England, arriving early in May, and departing in September. It is confined to no section, but may be observed anywhere in the twilight and also at any time during the day, especially in cloudy weather, coursing with splendid powers of flight overhead like a winged greyhound in endless evolu- tions. Sometimes it soars till it becomes but a speck to the view, and again skims swiftly low over the ground—now dashing impetuously forward, now sailing with easy bold sweeps of the pointed pinions, Fic. 5.—NIcHT-HAWK. arresting its course for a moment and then twist- ing and glancing with almost inconceivable velocity in its seemingly random race. But all this while the way- ward bird is providently gleaning its food from the air; these forays are made with an eye strictly to business, for the purpose of capturing the tiny gauzy creatures which swim in the rays of the departing sun; and in contemplating such adaptation of perfect grace to utili- tarlan purposes, we are taught the lesson that nature 54 CAPRIMULGIDZ : WHIPPOORWILLS ; NIGHT-HAWKS. bends the most diverse means to her useful ends. In the spring-time, during the period de xoces, the Night- hawk repeatedly plunges head foremost downward with fearful velocity, accompanying this startling cour de force with a strange booming sound, likened by some to the distant bellowing of a bull, by others to the noise made by blowing in the bung-hole of an empty barrel. About the first of June, the singular incidents of the courtship over, the Night-hawk deposits her two eggs upon the cold bare ground, scarcely a trace of a nest being formed to receive her treasured charge. The eggs are also frequently laid on bare rocks, and even the flat concreted roofs of houses in large cities, where the heat of the’ sun helps to incubate them, as it does those of terns and sandpipers, while the birds are flying about in broad daylight. The eggs are elliptical in contour, averaging in size 1.25 0.85, and are curiously fretted, veined and marbled with lavender, stone-gray and neu- tral tints. She is a faithful and courageous mother, who, when danger threatens, will at risk of life feign to be crippled, and endeavor to divert attention from her eggs to herself by fluttering and tumbling about as long as such pious fraud seems likely to suc- ceed —then quartering anxiously back and forth within a few feet of one who may be bending over the frail orbic bodies that encase her hopes. ‘‘ The nest- lings are hatched downy. This is a singular circum- stance, in which the Caprimulgide resemble the lower orders of birds, and not the higher groups with which they are associated. The chicks are not, however, hatched entirely clothed ; for the first two or three days they are only densely flocculent on the under parts, the upper being but sparsely downy; soon, however, they CHORDEDILES POPETUE: NIGHT-HAWK OR BULL-BAT. 55 are uniformly covered with down, variegated above, plain below. The design of this provision is evidently pro- tection from the damp ground on which the young rest. In the several instances of nesting I have found, there was nothing whatever between the birds and the earth; but occasionally, it is said, a few leaves or straws lie underneath them. A favorite nesting-place, in the West, is the little mounds of loose soil thrown up by the gophers, either in open fields, or by the edge of woods. The birds are also said to lay on the mould of stumps and logs, but I have never found eggs in such situations. One of the two eggs may be hatched sooner than the other ; in one instance I found an interval of three days to elapse, during which I frequently visited a nesting place. The female, on each occasion, remained near her charge until nearly trodden upon, and then fluttered off, making believe she was crippled, as perfectly as I ever saw the pious fraud performed in my life. Not having much, if any, legs to be lame in, she simulated a broken wing, fluttering and pitching about in the grass, at no time more than a few feet off. The statement that the bird will remove her young, if disturbed, is true. The bird I am alluding to carried them to another hillock, after my second visit, but only a couple of yards away.” Late in the summer, when all the birds are on wing, great troops of Night-hawks collect together, and may be seen coursing in the manner above described, crossing and recrossing each other’s path in the air, until it be- comes too dark to trace their flight any longer. As soon as the gnats and midgets disappear with the cool weather of September, their insatiable pursuers bend strong wings to the southward journey. 56 CYPSELID# : SWIFTS. FAMILY CYPSELIDA: SWIFTS. CHIMNEY SWIFT. Cua@tTuRA PELASGICA (L.) Steph. Chars. General color sooty-brown, with a faint greenish gloss above; grayish-brown below, becoming paler on the throat; wings black. Length, 5.00-5.25 ; extent, 12.50; wing, 4.75-5.00; tail, 2.00 or less, with spine-like tips of the feathers. One of the most interesting modifications of bird- structure is that by which the Swifts, belonging to an order of birds entirely different from Swallows in es- sential points of structure, are moulded to an exterior shape so closely simulating the form of a Swallow, that most persons believe them to be of that kind of bird: and “swallows” they are almost universally called. The resemblance is indeed striking; but it only illustrates how cunningly nature, in some sportive mood, furnishes similitudes in her endless diversity — no less easily than she fashions a wealth of diversity from essential unity. Humor has been defined as a perception of grotesque resemblance between incongruous things, and Swifts are amongst numberless conundrums which nature pro- pounds through her feathered creations. ‘Why is a Swift like a Swallow?” J give it up —and I doubt that any one can answer the question. The most remarkable thing about the exterior con- formation of the Swift is the spines which project from the ends of the tail-feathers, and serve as props to stay the bird while clinging with its sharp claws to the verti- CHAETURA PELASGICA: CHIMNEY SWIFT. 57 cal walls of a chimney or hollow tree. In former times, before the country was settled, the birds roosted and builded in hollows of trees, to which they resorted in thousands sometimes —a steady stream of the creatures pouring in at dusk to pass the night. Some such trees have become historic as “‘swallow-trees,” frequented year after year by countless numbers, till the bottom became filled with a mass of debris. Now, like Swallows, they have modified their primitive way, and almost always choose to make their nests in chimneys, — whence their name, — though too often exposed in such situations to disaster by fire and flood ; as when a soaking rain loosens the mucilaginous fastening of the nest, and the whole comes tumbling down. The “frying-pan” out of which the little birds sometimes fall ‘into the fire,’ is one of the Fic. 6.— CHIMNEY SWIFT, with most curious of all speci- mucronate rectrix, mens of bird architecture. It consists of a basket-work of bits of twigs, glued together and to the side of the chimney with the sticky saliva of the birds—the same substance that in other cases, as those of thé species of the East Indian genus Co//ocalia, forms the famous “edible bird’s-nests” used for making soup by the celes- tial heathens. The twigs are gathered in the most skil- ful manner by the birds, who dash past the ends of branches and snap off bits with the beak as quick as thought. The completed basket has a semicircular brim, and shallow cavity, in which are laid four or five pure white, narrowly elliptical eggs, about 0.70 in length by 58 CYPSELID : SWIFTS. 0.50 in breadth. In the North woods the nests are still often constructed in hollow trees, as well as in barns and sheds in the sparsely settled districts. The Swifts reach New England betimes in spring, some seasons by the middle of April, and again not till May, remaining through the greater part of September. Were it not that, being so abundant and so universally distributed, they lack the charm of novelty, they could not but excite wonder and admiration, so splendid are the powers of wing of these sombre-hued little creatures, so graceful and varied are their aerial excursions, so joy- ous and spontaneous their ceaseless twittering. They have a rare genius for flying, and do well to trust them- selves utterly to its promptings — the keen-bladed, sharp- pointed wing never fails of its stroke, though cutting a substance far more tenuous than the silken fabric which tested the temper of Damascus’ steel — not even when a pair, sailing for many rods in close convoy, suddenly meet with “the touch of the body electric,” as Whitman says in one of his realistic poems, and as speedily part again, recovering their way with marvellous dexterity. It is a pretty sight, again, to see the Swift hover fora moment over the chimney, then set the wings at an up- ward angle and drop lightly as a parachute down upon the nest within the smoky orifice. Sothe summer passes with these most airy of birds, in never ending cycles and epicycles, spirals, scrolls and nameless gyrations round the chosen nesting-place, till the coils are loosened, the circles widen like the waves of a pool disturbed by the falling stone, and the last curve straightens into southward line. T. COLUBRIS: RUBY-THROATED HUMMING-BIRD. 59 FAMILY TROCHILID; HUMMING-BIRDS. RUBY-THROATED HUMMING-BIRD. TROCHILUS COLUBRIS L. Chars. Upper parts golden-green; below white, with green sides ; a metallic gorget on the throat, reflecting rich ruby-red; wings and tail dusky-purplish, the latter forked, with narrow, pointed feathers. Female similar, lacking the gorget; tail black-barred, with some feathers white-tipped. Length of male, 3.25; wing, 1.66; tail, 1.25; bill 0.66. Female smaller. These jewelled feathers are so precious that with all the boundless wealth of nature economy must be prac- tised in the use of such materials; which is one reason why the Humming-bird is so diminutive a creature. It is found throughout New England in summer; for, al- though so delicate in physique that a cobweb may en- snare the tiny creature and even cause its death, the Hummer is full of spirit and fire, and goes well, like a lady’s watch, unless some touch too rude should interfere with the movements of so exquisite a mechanism. The adjustment of its vital forces is delicate in the extreme, and so subtile is the play of parts, that even emotion, such as terror, or dismay, or anger, may destroy life; yet, so long as the creature has its freedom to act, and its right to happiness, no braver bird flies. Fancy a Humming-bird attacking a man in defence of its nest! Yet it never hesitates to engage the giant like a very king of Lilliput, buzzing about as mad as a hornet, and making furious if futile thrusts with its rapier-like bill. 60 TROCHILID : HUMMING-BIRDS. Then again, many and long are the tournaments between rival males inflamed with jealousy and passion, while the little bodies for whom the war is waged amuse them- selves demurely with sunbeams and flowers. Though New England is far from the lands where Trochilide are assembled in endless variety and beauty, the single species which visits us is so common, that it is no remarkable thing to see a perfect galaxy “starring” on some flowery stage, attracted by the sweets which the nectaries of the blossoms distil, the same that make myriads of minute insects flock to a dainty feast. Poised on wings so rapidly whirred that they leave to the eye but a filmy outline, and make the bird seem suspended in the air by invisible spirit-power, the Hummer explores the heart of the flower; now spearing his insect prey with his sharp slender beak; now sucking the sweets through his tubular tongue, curiously fashioned into a sort of syphon. Darting from one flower to another too rapidly for the eye to follow the movements, — and with the humming sound which has given the whole tribe a name, — Colubris repeats the probing process till his hunger is satisfied, and then repairs to some favorite perch, near which probably the nest is placed. This, as many writers have remarked of late with less originality than appreciation, is one of the most beautiful objects in nature. ‘“ What enlightened person,” indeed, “can gaze upon this nest without regretting that man should in the progress of civilization so often forget Nature, fail to appreciate her, or even wrong her?” The fabric is placed upon a bough large enough for it to rest securely, or in the forking of a twig—oftenest upon some such horizontal support, but sometimes fastened to the side of more upright growths. The cavity only about T. COLUBRIS : RUBY-THROATED HUMMING-BIRD. 61 admits the end of one’s thumb, but the walls are thick, so that the entire structure is about as large as one of the cups of a child’s play “tea-set.’’ The fabric is felted with a mass of exquisitely soft cottony, silky, or woolly substances, such as plant-down and the like, but with very little coarser fibrous material, if any. Outside the finish is simply perfect, being a fresco of lichens. The eggs are never more than two in number; they are pure white in color, with a pink blush when fresh. The shape is rather elliptical than oval, and the size scarcely half an inch in the long axis by about one-third in the conju- gate diameter. Some may have thoughtlessly believed the charac- teristic sound emitted by the Humming-bird, from which the name is derived, to be the voice of the bird. But it is never heard when the creature is at rest, and is not vocal, but mechanical, resulting from the rapid vibrations of the wings, like the buzzing of bees and many other insects. The sharp squeaky voice is very different, and not ordinarily emitted; but is uttered with great vehemence and volubility in moments of ex- citement, as when the nest is threatened, when the courtship grows animated, or when the battle-cry is sounded to a hated rival. 62 ALCEDINID : KINGFISHERS. FAMILY ALCEDINIDA: KINGFISHERS. BELTED KINGFISHER. CERYLE aLcyon (L.) Boze. Chars. Head witha long, thin, pointed crest ; plumage compact and oily; feet extremely small, with syndactyle toes; tibiae naked below. Male: upper parts, a broad bar across the breast, and sides under the wings, dull blue with black shaft lines ; two spots around eye, and under parts, except breast and sides, white. Female: with a band of chestnut across the lower breast, ex- tending along the sides. In both sexes the quills and tail-feath- ers black, marked with white on the inner webs; outer webs of secondaries and tail-feathers like the back ; wing-coverts usually spotted with white; bill black, pale at base below. Length, 12.00-13.00; extent, 22.00; wing, about 6.00; tail, 3.50; bill, about 2.00, The “King’s fisher,” who takes his tribute from the’ streams, be they never so well guarded from ordinary poachers, is a common bird of New England, and resi- dent, or only forced southward by the freezing of the waters upon which his resources depend. But the bird partakes the character of a migrant and summer visitor, as many pairs enter the country in March from the south, and remain until the following November. Being strong of wing, it may be observed at times flying high over terra firma and far away from the liquid element ; but its permanent abode is seldom at any distance from its feeding grounds. The mill-pond where the running stream has been dammed to stillness—the running stream that cuts its way through gravelly banks, are CERYLE ALCYON: BELTED KINGFISHER. 63 favorite resorts, almost sure to be tenanted by a pair of these industrious birds, whose vehement cries are not less familar to the miller than the noise of his own ma- chinery. The birds are really far less numerous than many others less conspicuous and familiar, and usually a sheet or stretch of water is fished by only a single pair; but they are large, noisy, assertive creatures, im- possible to overlook, and therefore giving an impression of being more abundant than they really are in comparison with less notorious examples of birdlife. They may be seen either swiftly winging along the water-course, or hover- ing and’ plunging into the stream to rise suc- cessful with a fish in the beak, or perched upon some isolated outpost like aquatic Shrikes. The harsh cry has been aptly likened to the Fic. 7.— KINGFISHER. sound made by springing a watchman’s rattle, and it is no less startling in effect when breaking suddenly upon an unexpecting ear. The Kingfisher is a hole-breeder, like all of its tribe. Some of the many exotic species, which are less aquatic and feed rather upon insects and reptiles than upon fish, nest in hollows of trees; but all the true piscivorous Alcedinide burrow in the ground. A tunnel several — four, six or eight—feet in length, either straight or 64 ALCEDINIDZ : KINGFISHERS, elbowed, is dug by the bird with its spear-like beak; and in the chambered extremity of this excavation the nest is made, —if a few fish-bones can be called a nest. The sites selected are such as the Bank Swallow chooses ; and not seldom a gravel-pit, pepper-boxed with Swallow’s holes, shows one larger orifice than the rest, out of which, if one watch long enough, a Kingfisher will be seen to dart with amazing celerity and exultant cry. The eggs are laid late in May and in June. They average seven in number, are pure ‘white (like those of most Lole-breed- ers), and measure about 1.35 X 1.00. The Kingfisher nests are usually “handy” to the water, but not necessarily so ; for when no eligible site offers by the margin of the stream or pond, it is a matter of a few moments for the sturdy, sinewy bird to go a mile or more from his fishing- waters and find himself suited. As regards his relations with man, the bird has none that it cares to cultivate; is a thoroughly solitary, self-possessing creature, neither courting nor shunning observation, but simply indiffer- ent; and one who minds his own business so well as to be a perpetual rebuke to the busy-bodies who make so much mischief in the society of featherless “forked radishes.” C. ERYTHROPHTHALMUS: BLACK-BILLED CUCKOO. 65 FAMILY CUCULID: CuckKoos. BLACK-BILLED CUCKOO. CoccyGus ERYTHROPHTHALMUS (Wils.) Bd. Chars. Upper parts uniform satiny olive-green, or “ Quaker-color,” with bronzy reflections. Below pure white, or with a slight rusty tinge ; little if any rufous on wings ; lateral tail-feathers not contrasted in color with the middle pair, bldckish for a little dis- tance toward the end, then obscurely tipped with whitish ; such coloration of the tail-feathers always sufficing to distinguish the species from C. Americanus, without reference to other char- acters. A bare livid skin around eye; edges of eyelids red; bill blackish with little if any trace of yellow. Length, about 11.50; extent, 15.50; wing, 5.00-5.50; tail, 6.00-6.50; bill, under 1.00. Of the two Cuckoos which inhabit New England, the Black-billed is a much more numerous and characteristic bird than its rather southerly cousin of the yellow beak. It is an abundant summer resident in the woodland of all sections, arriving about the middle of May, and re- maining through September. But somewhat like C. americanus, it is toward the end of its migratory tether in New England, and therefore less common in the Canadian than in the other two Faunz represented in New England. Excepting for its hard dry voice, sound- ing so strangely that, however often heard, one scarcely becomes accustomed to the wild outcry, it would not be very frequently noticed, with so sly and furtive a man- ner does it wing its swift arrowy course through the foliage, or study concealment in the umbrage. Its habits 66 CUCULID: CUCKOOS. are specially secretive during the nesting season, when it has much of the sneaking, skulking ways of the para- sitic Cuckoos of the old world, which have set a stigma upon the family name. At other seasons it is more likely to come under observation, when its lithe form enlarges by the spreading of wings and tail as the agile creature turns and twists in active pursuit of its prey. Nor is there any reason why the Cuckoo should hide its head ; it is an orderly member of a disreputable family, rarely practising the vice which disgraces so many of its relatives, only lapsing occasionally into what the Evolu- tionists call “atavism,’ when it drops an egg in some other bird’s nest by sheer force of hereditary habit. The Cuckoo might reasonably apologize for such misdemeanor by urging a weight of family cares which few birds have to bear; being unable, through some defect of its egging- apparatus, to lay in rapid succession, and so incubate and raise a brood at one effort. The eggs follow at such long intervals, that some hatch before the rest are dropped ; and what with gaping throats to be satisfied, eggs to be covered and more to come, the birds have a hard time of it. The wonder is not that they are sometimes remiss or amiss in their duties, but that they do not seek a watery grave in the nearest Kingfisher’s premises. The nest will usually be found in a low tree or bush, sometimes even on a briar patch close to the ground. It is a slight loose structure of twigs, often a mere plat- form, but sometimes better finished with leaves, catkins and bark-strips. The eggs are numerous, as already hinted, but it is not easy to say exactly how many ; prob- ably seldom over five. They are elliptical in shape, greenish in color, of the tint prevailing in the eggs of our herons, and measure about 1.15 X0.90. COCCYGUS AMERICANUS : YELLOW-BILLED CUCKOO. 67 YELLOW-BILLED CUCKOO. Coccyeus americanus (ZL.) Ba. Chars. Upper parts as in foregoing species ; under parts milk- white ; middle tail-feathers like the back in color, the rest black, with large white tips ; wings extensively rufous ; under mandible and edge of upper mandible yellow. Size of the last, or slightly larger. The traits and habits of the Yellow-billed Cuckoo are those of the species just described, a the bird is much less numerous in New Eng- land, and decid- edly more south- ern. It really belongs to the Carolinian Fau- na, though over- lapping the next one, and even appearing at times in the Fic. 8.— YELLow-BILLED Cuckoo. Canadian. It is rather more of a woodland bird, keep- ing more in higher forests, and usually nesting at a greater altitude. Out of the immediate valley of the Connecticut it is somewhat irregular in its appear- ance, quite common some years in particular localities, and again hardly to be found. Mr. Merriam calls it a common summer resident in Connecticut. Mr. Minot says that it has evidently become less numerous near Boston than it once was, and is now considered rare in many if not all parts of New England. Mr. Allen speaks 68 CUCULIDE : CUCKOOS. of it as a rather frequent summer resident of Massachu- setts, somewhat irregularly dispersed, and very variable in respect to numbers in different years. At Amherst, where I have found it breeding, it is more or less numer- ous every year. According to Mr. Brewster it was not seen by him at Upton, Franconia or Gorham, and was rare at Norway, in Maine. - The nests and eggs cannot always be distinguished from those of the Black-billed Cuckoo, with that cer- tainty requisite for the value of oological material ; the eggs are, however, on an average more oval, larger and paler greenish. The same irregularity and delay in ovi- position that we have noted in the case of the Black- billed is witnessed in the present instance, it being the rule to find in the nest eggs in various stages of incuba- tion, with or without young birds also; and this species shows the same lingering tendency to drop eggs in alien nests. It has recently been established that the Ground Cuckoo of the Southwest, Geococcyx californianus, has the same habit ; and various irregularities of the kind are probably more prevalent among American Cuckoos than many are aware. The species of Crotophaga, for example, offer the curious case, that a flock clubs to- gether to build an enormous nest, in which several indi- viduals lay their eggs and hatch their young in a singular sort of communism. Thus it appears that our Cowbirds (Molothrus) are far from being alone among American birds in undesirable domestic traits. HYLOTOMUS PILEATUS: PILEATED WOODPECKER. 69 FAMILY PICIDA®: WOODPECKERS. PILEATED WOODPECKER. HyLotomus PILEATuS (L.) Bd. Chars. General color black ; head, neck and wings variegated with white or pale yellowish; bill dark horn color. Male, with a scarlet crest, and scarlet cheek-patches. Female, with crest only half scarlet, and no cheek-patches. Length, from 15.00 to 19.00; extent, about 28.00; wing, 8.50-9.50; tail, 6.00-7.00. Another of the many chapters for which the non- oscine and non-passerine land birds of New England fur- nish us occasion opens with the largest and finest rep- resentative of the Woodpecker family, many members of which will be seen to enter into the composition of our feathered fauna. The Pileated Woodpecker, or Logcock, or Black Woodcock, as the bird is called sometimes, is a species of wide and general distribution in North America; but a wild and solitary bird, delighting in the recesses of forests deepest and hoarest with age. It is one which retreats instinctively at the crack of the axe and the shriek of steam, and is therefore almost exterminated in the cleared and settled portions of New England. Some years hereafter, the faithful compiler of the records will present interesting items of the occurrence of this “ rare species” here and there; but for the present it may be spoken of in more general terms, as all of the “forest primeval” still harbors the great, black, scarlet-crested woodman, chips of whose powerful chiselling are still scattered at the feet of many a decrepit monarch. In 7O PICIDAE : WOODPECKERS. the nature of the case as stated, the Pileated Woodpecker is more numerous in northern than in southern New England, not in the least as a matter of geographical distribution, but simply because the heavy-timbered, swampy backwoods are best suited to its nature. Wher- ever the bird makes its abode, its presence is likely to be indicated by the noise of its hammering, audible at much greater distances than the tapping of the weaker Woodpeckers can be heard. It is also capable of much more extensive operations in denuding trees of their bark, often laying them bare in ‘ great areas. In Fic. 9.—Foot oF PILEATED WoopPECKER. thickly wooded swamp land, it may sometimes be seen working upon fallen logs; but it generally keeps high up among the tree-tops, especially such as are blasted by lightning or began their natural decay by “dying at the head.” From such elevated posts of observation it surveys a wide ground; watchful of every suspicious movement, and wary to the last degree, it makes off at the first alarm, and easily escapes pursuit. The eggs of all the Woodpeckers are of a crystalline texture, rounded form, and pure white color. They can- not be distinguished from each other, not even by size. For instance, the egg of the Pileated is remarkably small in comparison with the linear dimensions of the bird ; showing that the result depends largely upon the con- figuration of the parent. The eggs average about 1.25 X 1.00, being thus not greatly larger than Flicker eggs. PICUS VILLOSUS: HAIRY WOODPECKER. 71 HAIRY WOODPECKER. Picus vittosus ZL. Chars. Back black, with a long white stripe; quills and wing- coverts black, profusely spotted with white; four middle tail- feathers black ; next pair black and white; next two pairs white ; Under parts white ; crown and side of head black, with a white stripe above and below the eye. Male with a scarlet band on nape, which is wanting in the female; in young birds the crown is mostly red or bronzy. Varies greatly in size. Length, usually 9.00-9.50; extent, 16.00-17.00 ; wing, about 5.00; tail, 3.00; bill, 1.00; tarsus, middle toe and claw, 1.66. A resident bird throughout New England in wooded regions, but not so abundant as its “little brother,” the Fic. 10.— Harry WooprPEcKErR. Downy Woodpecker. There may be some shifting of locality with season, though hardly a migration in the strict sense of the term: for most observers agree that the Hairy is more numerous in the winter than in sum- 72 PICID/ : WOODPECKERS. mer, at any rate in southern New England. Such relative numbers may perhaps be accounted for by the fact that it is a rather shy and solitary bird, especially during the breeding season, — one which resorts to secluded places to nest, and is therefore less likely to come under obser- vation. The clearing away of the forests affects this bird as it does the Pileated, though to less extent, as the Hairy will often visit orchards, gardens and parks, to which the greater bird is a total stranger. The nesting is in no wise peculiar; the eggs are four to six in num- ber, measuring about 0.85 X0.65, laid in May and some- times early in June. The young birds differ from the adults in having the top of the head bronzy red or- even yellow, but may always be recognized by the characters given above, being much larger than the Downy Woodpecker, which they so much resemble in coloration. DOWNY WOODPECKER. Picus PUBESCENS L. Chars. Coloration exactly as in P. villosus, excepting that all the lateral tail-feathers are barred with black and white. Size much less. Length, 6.00-7.00; extent, I1.00-12.00; wing, 3.50; tail, less than 3.00; bill, about 0.66; whole foot, 1.25. The numberless holes you have so often seen drilled with regularity in rows around the trunk and large branches of the apple-tree are the work of this indus- trious and indefatigable little bird, whose tappings you may often have heard, or whose speckled body has so often put the tree-trunk in your line of vision when you sought to watch the hammering and chiselling process. PICUS PUBESCENS : DOWNY WOODPECKER. 73 The holes do not injure the tree, and the active carpzn- tero is one of the best friends of the fruit-grower, by de- stroying the insidious creatures which lurk beneath the bark and work destruction of his hopes in the end, unless their mischief is stayed by the friendly bird. Few of our feathered friends, indeed, are more directly bene- ficial to the husbandman than Woodpeckers, whose nat- ural food is the eggs and larvee of insects that prey upon the living objects of his concern; and among them all the Downy holds a leading place, through its great abundance, its familiarity and its industry. Its work of boring into the bark, par- ticularly of the dryer, older and more grub-in- fested trees must not be mistaken for the bark- stripping operations of the Sphyropicus, of which more anon, though both are too often confounded by the careless observer under whose ban they come to- gether with the name of “ sapsuckers.” Open the mouth of one of these borers whose work is beneficial, seize the tongue, and you may draw that curious organ far out beyond the end of the beak: it is a slender, cylindrical, sinewy spear, of a delicate flesh-color, arrow-headed and barbed. By a wonderful muscular mechanism the bird poises the quivering weapon and launches it forth with unerring aim to secure the hapless grub, which is then as adroitly withdrawn all writhing into the captor’s horny beak. The tongue of a Yellow-bellied Woodpecker is so constructed as to be scarcely extensible, and there- fore fails of any such office as I have described. Fic. 11.— Downy WoopPEcKER. 74 PICID : WOODPECKERS. Like the Hairy Woodpecker, the Downy is rather more frequently observed in fall and winter than in the breeding season; it is often prompted to seek safety in seclusion, but with the fearlessness of innocence, and that confidence in humanity which one’s own clear con- science so often establishes, to be so often abused, it not seldom nests in the orchard and garden. With almost incredible labor do the hopeful and expectant pair chisel a hole for the nest, relieving and cheering each other until the excavation, to them more important than the exhumation of a buried Ilium, is completed to their satisfaction ; when, about the middle of May, upon the bare chips and mould at the bottom of the cavity, the mother bird finds her crystal spheres, to the number of five or six, in size about three-fourths by three-fifths of an inch. BLACK-BACKED THREE-TOED WOOD- PECKER. PICOIDES ARCTICUS (Sw.) Gr. Chars. Only three toes; back uniform black; under parts white, barred on sides with black ; sides of head striped with black and white; quills spotted with white; middle tail-feathers black, lateral white, none barred. Crown of male with a square yellow patch. Length, 8.00-9.00; wing, 4.50-5.00 ; tail, 3.50-4.00. The whole range of ornithological science furnishes scarcely another instance than the genus Picozdes of the reduction of the digits of a bird to three, of which only two point forward, and of which the hind one is really the outer toe reversed to take the place of a missing hal- lux ; for in the three-toed genera of Alcedinide (Alcyone PICOIDES ARCTICUS: BLACK-BACKED WOODPECKER. 75 and Ceyx), for example, one of the anterior toes is aborted, and the proper hind toe remains in place. In one of the genera of Pzcumunide, however, there are like- wise only three toes. How the peculiarity originated, or what useful purpose in the bird’s economy is subserved by this unique anomaly, we are ignorant. It may be gravely doubted that a special creative fiat was required to remove the inner hind toe of a Woodpecker; and more reasonably presumed that supreme intelligence was equal to the establishment of laws by the orderly operation of which the modification in question was from the beginning a foregone necessity. However this may be, the loss of a digit does not appreciably interfere with the bird’s pursuit of happiness, nor affect in any marked degree its methods of attaining that end, which are the same as those employed by all its four-toed relations. As implied in the name, the Black-backed Wood- pecker is a boreal bird, finding the limit of its breeding range, as well as of its permanent abode, in the forests of northern New England, in the Canadian Fauna, and being for the rest only a winter visitor, of more or less rarity according to the weather or other extrinsic condi- tions of its movements. In Connecticut, according to Mr. Merriam, it is a rare winter visitor (B. Conn., 1877, . p. 64). The Massachusetts records are more numerous: for instance, see Allen, Pr. Essex Inst., iv, 1864, p. 523 Coues, zd7d., v, 1868, p. 262; Allen, Am. Nat., ili, 1870, p. §72; Purdie, 2dzd., vii, 1873, p. 693; Allen, Bull. Essex Inst., x, 1878, p. 20; Deane, Bull. Nutt. Club, v, 1880, p. 56; Brewster, zbzd@., vi, 1881, p. 182. The general habits and mode of nesting are in no wise peculiar. The eggs measure about 1.00 X0.80. 76 PICIDAS ; WOODPECKERS. WHITE-BACKED THREE-TOED WOOD- PECKER. PICOIDES AMERICANUS Brehm. Chars. With only three toes like the last, and quite the same coloration, excepting a white lengthwise stripe down the back, which is interrupted by black bars. Size of the last. This is a second species of the mutilate Woodpeckers —one whose range is intrinsically the same as that of its amputated congener, but whose winter wandering, as far as known, is not as extensive as the Black-back’s. There is no record for the Carolinian Fauna that I am aware of, and there are very few for the Alleghanian, though the bird is now and then seen in Massachusetts as a winter visitor from the north. Even in the forests where it resides it is a rarer bird than P. arcticus. The principal authority for its occurrence in Massachusetts is Mr. Allen, who mentions a pair taken near Lynn by Mr. George O. Welch (Am. Nat., iii, 1870, p. 572). YELLOW-BELLIED WOODPECKER. SPHYROPICUS VARIUS (L.) Ba. Chars. Male: crown crimson enclosed in black; chin, throat and breast black, enclosing a crimson patch on the former (which is white in the female); sides of head with two white stripes, one curving from the eye around the nape, the other running from the bill down the side of the neck, these stripes separated by black, and sometimes decidedly yellowish, instead of white ; belly yellowish ; sides with dusky arrow-heads ; back variegated with black and yellowish ; wings black, the quills profusely spotted SPHYROPICUS VARIUS: YELLOW-BELLIED WOODPECKER. 77 with white, the coverts with a large oblique white bar; tail black, most of the feathers edged with white, and the upper coverts mostly white. ‘“ Young birds lack the black areas of the head and breast, and the crimson throat patch, these parts being mottled gray. But in any plumage the bird is recognized by its yellowness, different from what is seen in any other eastern species, and a broad white wing-bar.” The tongue is scarcely extensible. Length, about 8.50; extent, 15.00-15.50; wing, 4.50- 5.00; tail, 3.50. A slight variety (zzchalds), with a band of red on the nape in addition to that above described, is sometimes seen in New England. This is a very different kind of Woodpecker from any of the foregoing—one remarkable not only for the varied beauty of its coloration, but also for certain ana- tomical peculiarities in which it stands alone among all the New England species, and as the cause or result of which, it is unlike the rest in its vital economy. The tongue cannot be thrust far out of the mouth, nor is it fashioned like a spear, being brushy at the end with little of the acuteness and hardness seen in the same organ of other Woodpeckers. It feeds upon insects, but only derives a portion of its sustenance from such sources, and takes the winged imagos readily by pursuing them in the air and returning after such exploits to its perch, almost in the manner of a Kingbird or Pewee. Nuts, berries and other fruits vary its fare; and to procure these it may often be seen creeping and hanging in the strangest attitudes among the terminal twigs of trees, so slender that they bend with the weight of the bird. The traces of its carpenter work on trees are quite pe- culiar; for it has a way of operating on sound healthy wood when the sap is flowing, by which patches of bark some inches in diameter are removed. The object of the bird is apparently to get at thé soft succulent inner 78 PICIDA : WOODPECKERS. bark in which the circulation of the wood is most active, and we cannot suppose that trees girdled and bled in such fashion are not injured by the operation. To some extent therefore the bird merits the name of “Sap- sucker,” and deserves the disfavor with which its ap- pearance in the orchard is usually regarded. Woodpeckers as a rule are stationary or nearly so, Fic. 12.— YELLOW-BELLIED WOODPECKER. shifting their quarters rather according to fortuitous cir- cumstances than in obedience to the strict law of north- south migratory impulse. If any one of our species comes fully within the letter of the law, it is the Yellow- bellied, as indeed might be inferred from what has been said of the nature of its food. In southern New Eng- land, the bird is chiefly observed in spring and fall ; in other sections it is a common summer resident, breeding in large numbers. No one should be sur- prised to hear of the bird in mid-winter, though I have overlooked the records to this effect, if any, in- deed, exist. The mode of nesting is in no wise pecul- CENTURUS CAROLINUS : RED-BELLIED WOODPECKER. 79 iar, nor are the eggs to be recognized by any infallible characters. They are four to six in number, and meas- ure about 0.90X0.75, but vary much in size as well as in degree of sphericity. RED-BELLIED WOODPECKER. CENTURUS CAROLINUS (L.) BA. Chars. Upper parts closely banded crosswise with black and white ; under parts whitish, reddening on the belly, with black arrow- heads on flanks; tail black, the outer feathers barred with white, the central feathers with black and white spaces ; rump mostly white ; primaries with large white blotches near the base, and other smaller spots. Male with the whole crown and nape scarlet. Female with less of this color. Length, 9.50-10.00 ; extent, 16.50-17.50; wing, about 5.00; tail, about 3.50. The Red-bellied is the rarest of all the New England Woodpeckers, being in fact only a casual summer visitor to the limit of the Carolinian Fauna, or slightly beyond. There is at least one early record of its occurrence in Connecticut, being that given by Linsley in 1843 (Am. Journ. Sci., xliv, p. 263); and other instances of like > nature have latterly been added by Mr. Merriam (Hart- ford and Suffield ; B. Conn., 1877, p. 65). Prof. Emmons gave it as breeding in western Massachusetts many years ago, and Mr. Allen has recently witnessed its occurrence in May at Springfield (Pr. Essex Inst., iv, 1864, p. 533 Bull. Essex Inst., x, 1878, p. 20. See also Plummer, Bull. Nutt. Club, vi, 1881, p. 120; Brewster and Allen, ibid., p. 183). It has been said to breed regularly though rarely in Long Island, and has often been seen in New York and Canada West. 80 PICIDH ! WOODPECKERS. RED-HEADED WOODPECKER. MELANERPES ERYTHROCEPHALUS (L.) Sw. Chars. Glossy blue-black ; whole head, neck, and forebreast crim- son; under parts from the breast, rump, and secondaries pure white ; primaries and tail feathers black. Sexes alike: Young, with the head plain gray, and the white secondaries barred with black. Length, 9.00-9.50; extent, 16.50-17.50; wing, 5.25- 5.50; tail, 3.50. The “red, white and blue” of this brilliant bird makes by far the most artistic display of color-contrast to be seen in the green woods of our country — not even the Scarlet Tanager or the Rose-breasted Gros- beak can compare with such flashing hues. Besides being arrayed in the handsomest of attire, this Wood- pecker is inexhaustible in fertility of inventions for pleasure or profit, and so versatile in the exhibition of resources for those ends as to partake of the character of genius. Its habits are therefore not easy to describe in a few words —its traits cannot be labelled in con- ventional phrase, and filed away with those of other woodpeckers — they require a pigeon-hole of their own, 2 which might be filled with anecdotes illustrating what has been said, did not the limits of our work forbid us that indulgence. The appearance of the bird in New England is irreg- ular, like most of its habits. Comparisons of the older with most recent authorities on the subject indicate that the species is now much less numerous than for- merly, This can hardly be owing to the progress of civilization, for the bird is as much at home in the garden and park as in the depths of the woods. The M. ERYTHROCEPHALUS : RED-HEADED WOODPECKER. 81 persecution which so conspicuous an apparition invites may have something to do with decreasing the numbers of the species; for certainly all persons with gun in hand, on their collecting tours, cannot resist the temp- tation of a shot at the beautiful creature, and the bird itself is one which never seems to profit by the lesson of danger notoriety teaches. It really belongs to more southern and western regions, its numbers in summer being greater in the Middle and even the Southern States than they are in New England ; and though it has been seen in each of our six States, it does not ordinarily proceed beyond Massachusetts. It was formerly not uncommon around Amherst, where I found several pairs nesting, and heard of others, and Mr. Purdie narrates that of late years numbers have occurred in Eastern Massachusetts (Bull. Nutt. Club, vii, 1882, p. 57). Even in Connecticut it is not so numerous that Mr. Merriam did not consider it worth while to specify various instances of its observation or capture in that State, where there appear to have happened various irruptions of the bird in considerable numbers, but at irregular intervals. Notwithstanding such scar- city on the confines of its distribution, and in spite of the fact that this species is one of the most decidedly migratory members of its tribe, it has been found within our limits in winter, on more than one occasion —as, for instance, about Boston during December, Jan- uary and February. It cannot be considered exclusively a visitor from the South, knowing, as we now do, its range in New York State, as recently indicated by Dr. Merriam (Bull. Nutt. Club, vii, 1882, pp. 57, 63). Wherever occurring at all in summer, it is not likely to be found alone, but in pairs, and often in companies ; 82 PICIDAE : WOODPECKERS. and its breeding in New England is one of the most orderly events of its desultory existence. The mode of nesting is not peculiar, a hole being excavated by the joint labor of the pair, generally in decayed wood so soft as to be readily chiselled out. A favorite situation is the blasted top of a tree, at a considerable elevation ; but its choice wavers with its whim, like all the rest of its actions, and it will often nest in a stub or evena fence-post. The eggs are usually four, five, or six in number, of characteristic whiteness and smoothness, measuring about 1.00 by 0.80, but too variable in this respect to be identified either by size or shape. The diet of the bird is by no means confined to grubs dug out of the bark; it catches insects on the wing with some address; and is fond of acorns, beech-nuts, and other small fruits, hard or soft, often laying the pro- ducts of the orchard and garden under contribution by way of variety. GOLDEN-WINGED WOODPECKER ; FLICKER. CoOLAPTES AURATUS (L.) Sw. Chars. Back, wing-coverts and inner quills olive-brown, closely barred with black: quills and tail-feathers black, with golden- yellow shafts and under surfaces. Rump, snowy white; crown and nape, ash, with a scarlet band; chin and throat, lilac- brown; a large black shield on the breast; under parts with numberless circular black spots; tinged on the belly with yel- low, on the sides with creamy-brown. Male, with black max- illary patches, wanting in the female. Length, 12.00-13.00; extent, 18.00-20.00 ; wing, 5.75-6.25 ; tail, 4.50. Last but not least of its interesting tribe comes this beautiful Woodpecker, so well known in New England Cc. AURATUS : GOLDEN-WINGED WOODPECKER. 83 as to have received half a dozen popular names besides those by which it is usually designated, as above. It isa resident, but less common in winter than at other times, as scarcity of food or other causes sends most individuals southward during the most inclement part of the year. It is a bird of wood-land, and nests after the manner of others of its family by excavating a hole in trees: but it is far from being con- fined to the depths of the forests, displaying its gilded plumes and emi- nent musical inability in parks, orchards, and even in fields, and by the way- side remote from forests, Its slightly curved bill is less sharp and chisel-like than most woodpeckers’, and its boring for insects in wood is less habitual. Much of its food consists of fruits, and it is partic- ularly fond of ants. To procure these insects it visits their hills, and finds no difficulty in capturing them by means of its very extensible, lumbriciform tongue, cov- ered with tenacious saliva, and capable of being thrust out several inches beyond the point of the beak. Its body sometimes acquires a smell of formic acid from such diet. This is one reason why the Flicker is so often seen away from trees, and foraging on the ground. Even when in the woods, it is often observed perched upon a bough in the fashion of ordinary birds, rather than Fic. 13. — FLICKER. 84 PICIDZ : WOODPECKERS. clinging to the upright trunks. Although so numerous and ubiquitous, the Flicker is a shy and watchful bird, easily alarmed by any unwonted approach, and quick to change its base of operations when disturbed, unless it has already made its nest. In this labor, shared by the two sexes with equal assiduity, the birds are untiring until the hole is exca- Fic. 14. —HEAD OF COLAPTES AURATUS. Natural size. vated to the proper depth, and repeated annoyances seldom suffice to drive the devoted pair from their chosen abode. If the nest is robbed, the female will bravely go on laying eggs—in some instances to the number of nearly two dozen before her resources are exhausted. If undisturbed, the usual number of eggs is six or seven, in shape not so nearly spheroidal as those of more typical Woodpeckers. They measure on an average about 1.15 in length by 0.90 in breadth, but are very variable in size and shape. As soon as the Cc. AURATUS : GOLDEN-WINGED WOODPECKER. 85 young are strong enough to use their feet, they scramble to the entrance of the burrow, and may soon after be seen clinging to the bark near the nest, while the anxious, but delighted parents, proud of their prom- ising beauties, encourage them to take short flights, till by degrees they become confident on the wing, and able to take care of themselves. Such duties and pleasures over, the birds display more strongly than in spring their sociable and almost gregarious nature, being generally seen trooping in considerable numbers until late in the fall, when all but the most hardy individuals make their way southward. 86 STRIGIDZ : OWLS, FAMILY STRIGIDA:: OWLS. BARN OWL. ALUCO FLAMMEUS PRATINCOLA (&p.) Coues. Chars. Facial disc highly developed. No tufts on head. Ex- ternal ear very large, operculate. Plumage very downy. Colors above, tawny, clouded with ashy and whitish, speckled with black- ish. Below, varying from whitish to fulvous, with sparse, sharp blackish spots; face white or fulvous, dark about the eyes, and bordered with dark brown. Wings and tail barred with brown, and mottled like the back. Feet bristly, but not densely feathered. Length, 16.00-17.00; wing, 12.00-13.00; tail, 5.50; bill whitish ; toes yellowish. Of the thirteen species of Owls found in New Eng- Fic. 15.— Foor or Barn Ow. Natural size. land, the present is the rarest, excepting the Burrowing Owl, which only occurs accidentally. The Barn Owl is little more than a straggler to southern New England; and the recorded instances of its occurrence are very few. Many years ago, a specimen was taken by the BUBO VIRGINIANUS: GREAT HORNED OWL. 87 Rev. J. H. Linsley at Stratford, Conn. (Am. Jour. Sci., xliv, 1843, p. 253). According to Mr. Merriam, one was found by Dr. Wm. O. Ayres at Hartford, Conn., about the year 1841; and another was killed at Madison, Conn., some years ago (B. Conn., 1877, p. 67). The fourth record for the State is given by Mr. J. A. Allen, who states that Dr. William Wood has a specimen in his cabinet shot at Sachem’s Head, Conn., Oct. 28, 1865 - (Am. Nat., ili, 1870, p. 570). There are two Massa- chusetts records: the first, given by Dr. Coues on Mr. Allen’s authority, of a specimen killed near Springfield, in May, 1868 (Pr. Essex Inst., v, 1868, p. 312); the other of one shot in Lynn, about 1864, as given by Mr. Allen (Am. Nat., iii, 1870, p. 646). The alleged Maine in- stance (Brown, Bull. Nutt. Club), ii, 1877, p. 28) has proven erroneous. See Brown, Bull. Nutt. Club, vii, 1882, p. 58. GREAT HORNED OWL. Buso VIRGINIANUS (Gm.) Bp, Chars. Of great size, with conspicuous ear-tufts, and facial disc complete ; feet entirely feathered. Length about 2 feet; extent, 4 feet; wing, 16.00 inches; tail, 10.00. Plumage intimately varied with blackish, whitish, light and dark brown, and tawny: a white collar on the throat. The sexes are alike, but the female is larger than the male. This large and powerful Owl, yielding only to the Great Gray Owl in size, and to none of its tribe in spirit and vigor, is a resident bird throughout New England, and one of the commonest of the nocturnal birds of prey. It chiefly inhabits the forests, but not seldom is 88 STRIGIDA : OWLS. its dismal hooting heard from some tree about the farm-house in places where the woods have been cleared away; while its occasional raids upon the poultry yard are only too well known. No nest is usually con- structed: the eggs are laid in the hollow of a tree, or in the cleft of rocks, often in the deserted nest of a hawk, which is patched up to suit, and very early in the season — in February or March, seldom if ever later than April. State- ments of authors are greatly at variance re- specting the nidifica- tion, as well as the number of eggs. So widely distributed a bird doubtless changes its habits to some ex- ¢ tent according to cir- * cumstances; but in New England, at any rate, the rule is that no nest is built, and only two eggs are laid. The probability is, also, that the eggs produce a male and female, as usual among pigeons. They are white in color, and measure about 2.25 by 1.90. These fine large Owls are sometimes taken alive in traps, and may easily be reared from the nest; they stand confinement well, and make interesting pets for those who are fond of studying the traits of rapacious birds in captivity. Fic. 16. GREAT HorRNED OwL, SCOPS ASIO;: SCREECH OWL; RED OR MOTTLED OWL. 89 SCREECH OWL: RED OR MOTTLED OWL. Scops asio (L.) Bp. Chars. A miniature Budo in form, with equally conspicuous ear- tufts, feathered legs and bristly toes. The plumage differs so remarkably (and not according to age, sex, or season), that the “red,” and “gray ” or ‘‘mottled ” Owl were long supposed to be two distinct species. In the gray plumage, the bird is gray, paler or whitish below, speckled with blackish above, and below blotched with the same. In the other condition, the general tone is bright brownish-red above, with sharp black streaks ; below, whitish or fulvous, much variegated. In either state, the wings and tail are barred with light and dark colors. Length, 8.00- 10.00 inches; extent, about 20.00; wing, 6.50~7.00; tail, 3.00-3.50. Fic. 17.—SCREECH OWL, 90 STRIGIDE : OWLS, A very common New England species, like the last, but strictly nocturnal, seeming dazed by the light when- ever it is forced to fly from the dark nooks where it loves to pass the day. The Great Horned Owl, on the other hand, flies well by day, seeming little incommoded in the sunshine. The nest of this little species is in a hollow tree, with sticks, leaves or feathers to receive the eggs: these are four to six in number, measuring about 1.40 by 1.25, and are laid usually in April. The bird is one of those that comes the most familiarly about houses, sometimes even taking up its residence in an out- building. Its tremulous, screeching notes, very different from the deep-mouthed hooting of the larger Owls, are familiar to all who have any experience with rural sounds. Like other Owls, the whole tribe of which are more notable in such respect than the diurnal birds of prey, the present species is very beneficial to the farmer by destroying field-mice. It is indeed to be regretted that the good offices of Owls are not more fully recog- nized. Though “the mousing Owl” is proverbial, few appear to have learned the full truth of the expression. LONG-EARED OWL. Asio witsonranus (Less.) Coues. Chars. A medium-sized species, with conspicuous ear-tufts, facial disc complete, immense external ears, and feathered feet. Plu- mage above intimately variegated with dark brown, fulvous, and whitish ; breast more fulvous, sharply striped; belly whiter, striped and barred with blackish ; wings and tail mottled, and closely barred with fulvous and dark brown. Face pale tawny, with black spots and eye-patches; bill and claws blackish. Length, 14.00-15.00; extent, 36.00; wing, I1.00-12.00; tail, 5.00-6.00 ; ear-tufts about 2 inches long, of 8 to 12 feathers. ASIO ACCIPITRINUS : SHORT-EARED OWL. QI Resident, and not uncommon throughout New Eng- land. It inhabits woods and thickets, and is seldom seen abroad in daylight, unless startled accidentally from its retreat. Though so similar in form to the Short-eared Owl, and often found in marshy and bushy places with the latter, it has ways of its own, and neither nests on the ground nor is partial to swampy localities. The nest is usually in some thick evergreen tree, and built by the bird itself, though a deserted crow’s or hawk’s nest is sometimes utilized for the purpose. The eggs are laid in April, numbering from four to six ; they are of the usual shape and color, but quite variable in size, varying from 1.41 to 1.65 in length, by about 1.25 in diameter. SHORT-EARED OWL. Asio aAccipITrinus (Pall) Newt. Chars. Above, completely variegated, chiefly in streaks, with fulvous or tawny and dark brown; breast much the same; other under parts paler, usually bleaching on the belly, which is sparsely and sharply streaked (never barred) with dark brown ; feet and crissum usually immaculate whitish or pale tawny ; under surface of wings uninterruptedly white. Quills of the wings varied, mostly in large pattern, and tail pretty regularly barred, with the two colors of the upper parts. Facial area white or nearly so, but with large black eye-patch ; ruff minutely speckled with fulvous and blackish, white-bordered internally, and usually with a blackish patch be- hind the ear; radiating feathers of the ear-flap streaked with blackish and fulvous. Iris bright yellow ; bill and claws dusky- bluish. Feet feathered to the claws; soles perfectly naked, granular, yellowish. External ear-parts extremely large, 2 inches or more across the longest way; ear-tufts small, inconspicuous, few-feathered. Length of male, 14.50; extent, 41.00; wing, 11.75; tail, 6.00; foot, to end of middle claw, 3.50; chord of culmen, 1.10. Female somewhat larger. g2 STRIGIDZ : OWLS. The Short-eared Owl is one of the commonest species, rather more so than the last, and seems to be especially numerous in marshy places along the coast. It is some- thing of a ground Owl, oftener seen in low thickets and brakes than in high woods, and is frequently abroad in the daytime. It sometimes gathers in considerable companies, being one of the few species ever observed “in flocks.” This is one of the most patient and persistent hunters of the shrews and field-mice, which, when nu- merous, are a serious annoyance to the farmer; and on this account deserves to be protected and encouraged, though it is also destructive to various small birds. It may sometimes be observed during the day quartering low over marshy ground, on the lookout for its game; but is oftener startled from its retreat in some thick bush, when it rises as if confused, and hurries off for a few yards to pitch down again out of sight. The nest is usually built on the ground, in a loose, slovenly man- ner, consisting of a few twigs, grasses, and feathers. The eggs are commonly four to six in number, laid in April ; they are chalky white, subspherical, and measure about 1.55 by 1.25. GREAT GRAY OWL. STRIX CINEREA Gm. Chars. Of largest size ; length about 24 feet ; extent, 44 ; wing, 14; tail, 1 or more. Head smooth, without ear-tufts ; facial discs complete, and of great extent ; ear-parts moderate, operculate ; eyes rather small. Tarsi and toes fully feathered. Above, ashy- brown, mottled in waves with ashy-white; below, similar but paler, the markings disposed in streaks on the breast, elsewhere in bars; the great face discs marked in concentric rings of lighter and darker colors ; wings and tail with five or six bars. STRIX CINEREA: GREAT GRAY OWL. 93 This is an Arctic species, decidedly more so than the Snowy Owl even, of infrequent occurrence in northern New England, and rarely straggling as far as Connecticut in winter only. The great size of the bird renders it conspicuous on the rare occasions when it favors us with a flying visit, and perhaps most of its occurrences become known. There is but one Connecticut record, that given by Linsley, of a capture at Stratford, Jan. 6, 1843 (Am. Journ. Sci., xliv, 1843, p. 253). Mr. Merriam (Rev. B. Conn., 1877, p. 70) adduces a Massa- chusetts record from the History of Lynn, 1865, in which is narrated the capture of a specimen near Bos- ton in the winter of 1852. Dr. Coues catalogues two Massachusetts specimens in the Museum of the Essex Institute, both taken in Essex County, one in the win- ter of 1866-67, the other in February, 1859 (Pr. Essex Inst., v, 1868, p. 260), Mr. Allen adduces several Massachusetts instances (Pr. Essex Inst., iv., 1864, p. 81; and Am. Nat., ili, 1870, p. 570). Mr. N. C. Brown speaks of a specimen in the collection of the Portland Society of Natural History, found dead some years before on one of the islands in Casco Bay; adding that the specimen remained unique for that locality, though he had also examined one taken at Brunswick (Pr. Portl. Society, Apr. 1882). Mr. Babcock of Sherborne informs me that an individual was shot many years ago in a large pine swamp near his residence. Mr. Minot speaks of one which he observed in some pine woods near Milton, Mass., early in 1875, toward the end of an exceptionally severe winter (B. N. E,, 1877, p. 331). The great bird may be resident in Northern New England, but we have no advices of its presence there in summer. 94 STRIGIDZ : OWLS. BARRED OWL. STRIX NEBULOSA Forst. Chars. Resembling the last in form, but much smaller, and other- wise easily distinguished. Length, about 18.00; extent, 40.00; wing, 14.00; tail, 9.00. Upper parts ashy-brown, barred with white and tinged with fulvous ; under parts similar, but lighter, the markings in cross-bars on the breast, elsewhere in streaks ; the wings and tail barred with brown and white, ashy, or tawny. A rather common resident species in New England, generally inhabiting thick woods, and not so frequently coming under observation as some of the others. It may easily be recognized by its similarity in form to the Gray Owl, having the same large smooth head and im- mense facial discs ringed with light and dark colors, in connection with its much smaller size and barred breast. The hooting outcry is also characteristic. The numbers of the birds appear to decrease with the clearing off of the forests to which they are so much attached, but these Owls are still numerous. The nest will be found in the hollow of a tree, or high up in a crotch; the eggs, to the number of three or four, are white and spheroidal, measuring about two inches in length by one and two- thirds in breadth; they are usually laid in April. The food of the species, as of others of the family, consists of small quadrupeds, birds, and insects. SNOWY OWL. NycTea scanpiaca (L.) Newt. Chars. Of large size; nearly 2 feet long; wing, 17 inches ; tail, 9 or1o. The head is apparently smooth, but there are really small NYCTEA SCANDIACA: SNOWY OWL. 95 ear-tufts, generally overlooked. Facial discs large and complete. Feet densely clothed with feathers. Color white, with more or fewer dark markings, according to age, sex, or other circum- stances ; some individuals are nearly white, but the majority are fully spotted with dusky, especially on the upper parts. The general appearance, however, is unmistakable. Though an Arctic species, this is a very frequent winter visitor in New England, whose ap- pearance is too com- mon and too nearly regular to require any citation of spe- cial instances. In some seasons there is a sort of irruption of these birds from the north, and we hear of their capture in all quarters, they being too conspicu- ous both in size and color to escape atten- tion. Such a case occurred in the win- ter of 1877, as re- Fic. 18.—Snowy Owt. corded by Mr. Ruthven Deane (Bull. Nutt. Club, ii, Jan., 1877, p. 9), and many other observers. The great white bird not seldom extends its winter wanderings to the Middle States. The summer home is beyond our limits, and extends to very high latitudes; but, as suggested by Mr. Boardman, the Snowy Owl may yet be found breeding in the woods of Maine. 96 STRIGIDZE : OWLS. HAWK OWL; DAY OWL. SURNIA FUNEREA (L.) Rich. and Sw. Chars. Dark brown above, more or less thickly speckled with white ; below, closely barred with brown and whitish, the throat alone streaked; quills and tail with numerous white bars ; face ashy, margined with black. Length about 16.00; extent, 32.00 ; wing, 9.00; tail, 7.00, graduated, the lateral feathers 2 inches shorter than the central. Except in the length of its tail, which produces linear measurements unusual for a bird of its bulk in this family, its general form is that of the Snowy Owl. Like that species, it is a bird of Arctic regions, coming southward in winter, but its range is more restricted, rarely extending to the Middle States. It is the most diurnal bird of the family, ranging abroad at all times, and approaches a hawk more nearly than any other. The Hawk Owl doubtless inhabits the woods of Northern New England as a permanent resident, and has actually been observed in Maine during the breed- ing season; but I am not aware of authentic advices, as yet, of its nesting within our limits. It is recorded from each of the other States, excepting Rhode Island. In Connecticut, it was unknown until 1869, when Dr. F. W. Hall procured a specimen in November (Merriam, B. Conn., 1877, p. 73). In Massachusetts it is a rare and irregular winter visitor, but has been on the books since 1833 at least; Mr. Allen gives several instances (Am. Nat., iii, 1869, p. 569); I have a specimen taken near Amherst, and Mr. Maynard mentions two examples (Birds E. N. A., 1881, p. 278). Further north, the bird becomes one of regular occurrence in winter. The nest is usually placed in trees; it is composed of sticks, lined with hay, grass and feathers; the eggs are four to six in number, 1.50 to 1.62 long X 1.20 to 1.30 in breadth. N. TENGMALMI RICHARDSONI: RICHARDSON’S OWL. 97 RICHARDSON’S OWL. NYCTALA TENGMALMI RICHARDSONI (Bp.) Ridg. Chars. Above, olivaceous chocolate brown, spotted with white; beneath white, spotted and streaked with a brown similar to the back, but a little darker; disc, white ; a white spot between bill and eye ; wings and tail with white spots on both webs, the latter with from 8 to Io pairs. Bill, light yellow ; iris, yellow ; tarsus feathered ; disc complete. Cere not tumid, the nostrils pre- senting laterally and obliquely oval. Length, 10.00; extent, 21.00 to 23.00; wing, 7.25; tail, 4.50. Still another of these rare and shadowy night-callers from hyperborean regions — this time a little fellow, much smaller than any of the foregoing excepting Scops, though exceeding the common “ Saw-whet”’ considerably. It is more common in Northern New England, where it is prod- ably resident, like the Snowy and Hawk Owls, and whence it makes its silent and irregular way southward in winter. The Connecticut record is single to date: that of a speci- men captured many years ago in midwinter at East Wind- sor Hill, as recorded by Dr. William Wood in the Hart- ford Times of Aug. 24, 1861 (Allen, Pr. Essex Inst., iv, 1864, p. 52; Merriam, B. Conn., 1877, p. 73). The Massachusetts instances are several: see, for instance, Allen, as just quoted, and in Am. Nat., iii, 1870, p. 646; Maynard, Nat. Guide, 1870, p. 133; and Brewer, Pr. Bost. Soc., xx, 1879, p. 271. The last named author says: “Mr. Harry Merrill, writing Feb. 14, 1879, in- formed me that he had recently procured an example of this species in the neighborhood of Bangor. It was kept alive for some time, and Mr. Merrill was interested to learn that Mr. Audubon procured the only living 98 STRIGIDA : OWLS. specimen he had ever seen of this species, in Bangor, in 1832. And Feb. 26, 1879, Mr. Outram Bangs procured a female example near Newton, Mass.” In Rhode Island, the bird appeared near Providence in the winter of 1881, as stated by F. T. Jencks (Bull. Nutt. Club, vi, 1881, p. 123). The eggs are described as measuring 1.28 X 1,06, SAW-WHET OR ACADIAN OWL. NycTata AcADICcA (Gm.) Bp. Chars. A small Owl, with the head untufted, the facial discs com- plete, the ears operculate, the tarsus longer than the middle toe, the tail nearly even, the third quill longest, the first five emargin- ate. Less than the last: length, under 8.00; extent, 17.00; wing, 5.50; tail, 2.67, thus not more than half as long as the wing. Color above chocolate-brown, spotted with white, the tail with transverse white bars ; the adu/¢ with the facial area and forehead variegated with white, the face and superciliary line grayish-white, the lower parts white, with spots or streaks of the color of the back; the young with the facial area and forehead dark brown, the face dusky, the eyebrows pure white, the lower parts brown, paler on the belly, unmarked. Thus similar to WV. vichardsonz in color, but the bill is black, with tumid cere, and the nostrils open interiorly. Unlike the three last, this diminutive Owl, the smallest of any to be found in the Eastern States, is a resident inhabitant of our country, and not so uncommon as its infrequent capture or observation might lead one to suppose. Being completely nocturnal, and of such slight personal presence, it is less likely to be seen than are its queer scraping notes, which have been likened to the sharpening of saw teeth with a file, to be heard S. CUNICULARIA HYPOGAEA : BURROWING OWL, 99 in the depths of the woods the curious little creature inhabits. The nest is usually in the hollow of a tree, where are laid, in April, eggs to the number of four, five, or six, white in color, and of the usual shape for this family, measuring only one inch in length by seven- eighths in diameter. While it is scarcely necessary to enlarge upon the numerous cases of the occurrence of so common a bird, the reader in search of particular instances may be referred to the following late records, attesting its con- stant presence and breeding in various parts of New England: Coues, Pr. Ess. Inst., v, 1868, p. 260; Brewer, Pr. Bost. Soc., xvii, 1875, p. 444; Purdie, Bull. Nutt. Club, i, 1876, p. 72; ti, 1877, p. 14; Deane, ibid., ii, 1877, p. 84; Allen, Bull. Essex Inst., x, 1878, p. 21; Merriam, B. Conn., 1877, p. 74; Minot, B. N. E., 1877, p. 334; Brewster, Bull. Nutt. Club, vi, 1881, p. 143; vii, 1882, p. 23. BURROWING OWL. SPEOTYTO CUNICULARIA HYPOGEHA (Bp.) Coues. Chars. Above, grayish-brown, with white, black-edged spots; below, tawny white, variegated with reddish-brown, chiefly disposed in bars; face and throat whitish; crissum and legs mostly un- marked; quills with numerous paired tawny white spots, and tail-feathers barred with the same; bill, grayish-yellow; claws, black. Length, 9.10 long ; wings, 6.50-7.50 ; tail, 3.50-4.00. No tufts ; facial disc imperfect ; tarsi very long, extensively denuded, bristly like the toes. Prairies and open portions of the United States west of the Mississippi; Florida. Though we trust our outline of the New England Owls is not a “chapter of accidents,” the occurrence of 100 STRIGIDZ : OWLS. the Burrowing Owl in our midst, with note of which we finish consideration of the night-birds of prey, certainly belongs to such a category. One individual of this singular species made its appearance at Newburyport, in Massachusetts, May 4, 1875, at which time and place it was done to death by Messrs. H. Joyce and J. K. Fic. 19.— BILLS AND FEET OF BuRROWING OWLS. Clifford, as originally stated by Mr. Ruthven Deane in the “Rod and Gun” newspaper, vol. vi, May 15, 1875 —as duly repeated by Dr. T. M. Brewer, Pr. Bost. Soc., xvii, 1875, p. 444; by Mr. H. D. Minot, B. N. E., 1877, p. 343; by Mr. J. A. Allen, Bull. Essex Inst., 1878, p. 21 —and as here again said. Burrowing Owls occur in Florida, and are very common on the Western plains where they live in prairiedog towns as well as in com- munities by themselves. Varieties of the same species inhabit portions of the West Indies and South America, C. CYANEUS HUDSONIUS : MARSH HAWK, OR HARRIER,. IOI FAMILY FALCONID4: HAWKS. MARSH HAWK, OR HARRIER. CIRCUS CYANEUS HuUDSONIUS (L.) Schd. Chars. Face with an imperfect disc, somewhat as in the Owls, to which this genus is related. Bill weak, with a lobe on the cut- ting edge of the upper mandible, but no tooth. Wings, tail, and feet long for the bulk of the bird; the tarsi are scutellate before and behind, and twice as long as the middle toe; nostrils oval. Plumage of the old male remarkably different from that of the female and young. Above, pale ashy blue, nearly unvaried ; below nearly white; the quills blackish toward the end. Upper tail coverts conspicuously white on both sexes, at all ages, female and young, above, dark brown streaked with reddish- brown, below, the reverse of this ; tail banded with these colors. Length of male, 16.00-18.00 ; extent, 40.00; wing, 14.00-15.00 ; tail, $.00-9.00 ; female about 2 inches longer, and other dimen- sions correspondingly greater. The Diurnal Birds of Prey, including all kinds of Hawks, Harriers, Kites, Falcons, Eagles, and Buzzards (not the Turkey Buzzard), are well represented in New England, where no fewer than seventeen species or varieties are found —three of them of rare or excep- tional occurrence, the remaining fourteen more or less abundant and generally distributed. The first species we present is one of the “ignoble” hawks, of com- paratively little spirit and ambition, and altogether little above the level of a ‘‘ mousing owl.” The Harrier flies at the most humble game, feeding chiefly upon field- mice, shrews, frogs, toads, and insects, and may usually 102 FALCONIDZ : HAWKS, be seen quartering low over the ground in search of such quarry. Though it has great sweep of wing, in proportion to its bulk of body, it seems to lack the address, if not also the courage, to cope with creatures possessing good resources for self-preservation or self- defence. It is particularly attached to low, watery places, where mice and reptiles most abound; and in further evidence of humility, the nest is placed on the ground,—an exceptional manner of nidification Fic, 20. = Mars Hawk. among Hawks. The nest is about a foot in diameter, and three inches in depth, consisting of twigs and grasses, usually without special lining. The eggs, which are laid in May, are four or five in number, measuring (on an average, for they vary much) about 1.85 x 1.45. They are pale greenish-white, without bold marking, usually almost uniform, but sometimes with dull obscure spots and blotches of very pale brown, with still paler neutral tint or lavender shell-spots. The Harrier is one of the common New England Hawks, present during the greater part of the year if ELANOIDES FORFICATUS : SWALLOW-TAILED KITE. 103 not the whole, but oftenest seen in spring, summer, and fall, as it moves off when the waters close, and the frogs and mice are in their winter quarters. The opposite sexes are often mistaken for different species, but even our brief description should suffice to correct such error. SWALLOW-TAILED KITE. ELANOIDES FoRFIcATUS (L.) Cones. Chars. Head, neck, and underparts, white; back, wings, and tail, lustrous black. Tail a foot or more long, deeply forficate ; wing, 15-18, pointed; feet small, greenish-blue; claws pale; tarsi reticulate and feathered half-way down in front; toes hardly webbed; nostrils broadly oval. A beautiful bird, common in the South Atlantic and Gulf States, where it is a marked feature of the scenery in regions where the sunbeams are redolent of the orange and magnolia, and where the air reeks with the pestilent miasm of the moss-shrouded swamps that sleep in perpetual gloom. But, imbued with a spirit of adventure, and possessing unequalled powers of flight, it often wanders far from its southern home — to the bleak and windy fields of Dakota, the tamarack fastnesses of Minnesota, the green slopes and gray crags of our own beloved New England. Its occurrence in this portion of the United States is, however, rare and casual. It was ascribed to Vermont, no doubt correctly, by a writer of the last century, and has been shot on Long Island. Coming to later dates we find Mr. Allen speaking of its appearance at Whately, Mass., about 1868 (Am. Nat., iii, 1870, p. 645); and Mr. Merriam cites two Connecticut instances (B. Conn., 1877, p. 76). One of these occurrences was at Lyme, New London Co., July 2, 1877; the other in the vicinity of Portland, in the summer of 1861. Although the bird 104 FALCONID : HAWKS. was shot in neither of these cases, we presume there could be no mistake in identifying an individual of so remarkable a species. SHARP-SHINNED HAWK. ACCIPITER Fuscus (Gm.) Bp. Chars. Bill short, stout, very high at base for its length, without tooth. Legs extremely slender. Tarsus feathered but a little way down in front, the bare portion longer than the middle toe; tarsal scutella frequently fused. Toe, long, slender, much webbed at base, and padded underneath. Fourth quill longest, second shorter than sixth, first very short. The ordinary plumage is dark brown above (deepest on the head, the occipital feathers showing white when disturbed) with an ashy or plumbeous shade which increases with age, till the general cast is quite bluish-ash ; below, white or whitish, variously streaked with dark brown and rusty, finally changing to brownish-red (palest behind and slightly ashy across the breast) with the white then only showing in nar- row cross-bars; chin, throat, and crissum mostly white with blackish pencilling ; wings and tail barred with ashy and brown or blackish, the quills white-barred basally, the tail whitish- tipped. Bill dark; claws black ; cere and feet yellow. Length of male, 10.00-12.00; extent, 22.00; wing, 6.00-7.00 ; tail, 5.00- 6.00 square ; female an inch or two longer, and correspond- ingly larger in other dimensions. This spirited and dashing little Hawk is one of New England’s common species, especially in the breeding season ; for it chiefly withdraws from our limits during the colder months, probably not passing the winter except in our southern districts. It is commonly known as the “Pigeon Hawk;” but that name belongs prop- erly to the small species of Falco (not Accipiter) de- ACCIPITER COOPERI: COOPER’S HAWK. 105 scribed beyond as F. columbarius, and local naturalists should be careful to make the proper discrimination, especially when they speak of the nest and eggs. The present is much more abundant than the true Pigeon Hawk, and in most sections one of our best known birds of prey. It preys chiefly upon small birds and quadrupeds, captured in the dashing manner of all the species of this group, and, like its small allies, feeds to some extent upon insects; the size of its quarry is some- times not inferior to that of the bold hunter itself, and nothing can surpass the impetuosity with which this Hawk makes its attacks. It nests in trees, or on rocks, preferably the former, laying four or five eggs. They are difficult of concise description, because so variable. The white ground-color has often a livid or even purplish tint, and is marked, often so thickly as to be obscured, with large, irregular splashes of various shades of brown, interminably changeable in number, size, and pattern, sometimes inclining to form masses or a wreath, some- times more evenly distributed. The egg is of nearly equal size at both ends, and measures about 1.45 by 1.15. The bird isa late breeder, laying commonly the latter part of May, and early in June. The nest is usually placed high in a tree, preferably an evergreen, and built of sticks or twigs, in the crotch of a limb, but sometimes the deserted nest of a squirrel is selected and repaired to suit. COOPER’S HAWK; CHICKEN HAWK. ACCIPITER COOPERI Bf, Chars. Coloration and changes of plumage the same as those of A. fuscus. Form stouter, and size much greater. Feet moder- 106 FALCONIDA : HAWKS. ately stout; bare portion of tarsus shorter than middle toe; the tarsal scutella always distinct. Tail a little rounded. Length of male, 16.00-18.00 ; extent, about 30; wing, 9.00-10.00; tail, 7.00-8.00 ; female averaging about 2 inches longer than the male, the wing and tail an inch longer. In this species the whole foot, though relatively shorter than that of A. fuscus, is four inches or more in length ; in /zsczs the same part is only 3.50, or less. Cooper’s Hawk is one of our most abundant species, particularly in the lower tier of States; it is chiefly a Fic, 21.— BiLt anp Foot or Coorer’s Hawk, nat. size. summer resident, but many individuals remain through the winter. For audacity and address in capturing birds and quadrupeds of considerable size, it is surpassed by few of its tribe, while its physique is sufficiently power- ful to enable it to play havoc with domestic poultry. Its common name of Chicken Hawk is earned by its exploits in the barn-yard, where its raids are no less frequent than successful. It not seldom strikes down birds bulkier than itself, and in fact too heavy for it to fly away with. Numbers additional to those that winter with us make their appearance in March, and it is not till the following ACCIPITER COOPERI: COOPER’S HAWK. 107 November that the visitants move southward. The birds pair in April, and lay the latter part of this month or early in May. The nest is usually high in a tree, preferably an evergreen, resembling that of a Crow; the birds usually build for themselves, but sometimes fit up a Crow’s nest, or the nest of some other Hawk, to suit their purposes. They appear to be devoted and assidu- ous progenitors, if the way they persist in their efforts, under discouraging circumstances, be taken as any criterion. More than one instance has been recorded of their laying at least thrice, when their nest has been repeatedly robbed. Three, four or five eggs may be found in the nest. They measure from 1.80 by 1.55 to 2.10 by 1.60—figures showing the variation both in size and shape—they average about 1.90 by 1.50. They resemble those of the Marsh Hawk so closely as to be not certainly distinguishable, but they are usually more globular, and with a more granulated shell. The great- est diameter is at or very near the middle ; difference in shape of the two ends is rarely appreciable. They are usually more uniform in color than those of most hawks, normally resembling the pale, scarcely-marked examples occasionally laid by most species. The ground-color is a white, faintly tinted with pale bluish or greenish- gray; if marked, it is with faint, sometimes almost obsolete, blotches of drab, liable to be overlooked with- out close inspection; only an occasional specimen is found with decided, though still dull and sparse, mark- ings of pale brown. 108 FALCONIDA : HAWKS. AMERICAN GOSHAWK. ASTUR ATRICAPILLUS (Wils.) Bp. Chars. Adult, dark bluish-slate blackening on the head, with a white superciliary stripe ; tail with four broad dark bars; below, closely barred with white and pale slate, and sharply streaked with blackish. Young, dark brown above, the feathers with pale edges, streaked with tawny-brown on the head and cervix; below fulvous-white with oblong brown markings. Female 2 feet long ; wing, 14 inches; tail, 11; male smaller. A large, power- ful, and, in perfect plumage, a very handsome hawk, inhabiting northern North America; the northern half of the United States chiefly in winter. This noble hawk, one of the handsomest birds of the family when in perfect plumage, is a decidedly boreal species, entirely wanting in the southern portions of the United States, appearing only in winter, and in small numbers, in the middle districts, but common along our northern frontier. According to the records examined, it is, as a rule, rare in Southern New England, where, however, it appears some winters in considerable num- bers. Mr. Allen remarks that it was common in Massachusetts in the winter of 1859-60; and Mr. Samuels states that the same season he received a dozen or fifteen specimens from the vicinity of Boston. The only region in the United States where it is reported as regularly resident is Northern New England, where, both Mr. Boardman and Prof. Verrill state, it is of common occurrence, and breeds. But it has been seen in summer in Massachusetts, and doubtless breeds in that State. Mr. Maynard describes the eggs as three or four in number, rather spherical in shape, of a FALCO GYRFALCO: GYRFALCONS OR JERFALCONS. 109 bluish-white color, either immaculate or finely mottled with pale reddish-brown ; the size, 2.30 by 1.82 to 2.32 by 1.92. According to Dr. Brewer, the egg of the Goshawk is 2, long by 14% broad, nearly spherical, roughly granulated, soiled white, with a faint bluish shade, ‘marked irregularly with large but quite faint blotches of drab and yellowish-brown.” It thus closely resembles that of Cooper’s Hawk, differing chiefly in its larger size; and the nidification is represented as being the same in essential particulars. In the nature of its prey, its mode of securing it, its general habits and nature, we find it also much the same, the only differ- ence resulting from its superior prowess, if not more ferocious nature. GYRFALCONS OR JERFALCONS. FALco GYRFALCO LZ. Chars. Tarsus feathered fully half-way down in front, with only a narrow bare strip behind, irregularly reticulate on the bare parts ; longer than the middle toe. First quill shorter than the third; second quill longest; first alone decidedly emarginate on the inner web. Upwardof 24.00 long; wing, about 16.00; tail, 10.00. Bill with a sharp tooth on cutting edge of upper mandible ; the end of the under mandible notched or truncate. Nostrils with a centric tubercle. Color white, with dark markings, much as in the Snowy Owl; or, ash-colored with numerous lighter bars ; or, quite blackish. Young, longitudinally striped on under parts. An arctic Falcon of circumpolar distribution, in this country reaching the Northern States. It is split into several varieties, which, however, do not seem to be strictly geographical, and concerning which ornithologists are singularly agreed to dis- agree — inter negotia talia, cuigue suum. In var. candicans, which is the best marked form, inhabiting North Greenland and 110 FALCONID : HAWKS. other high latitudes, the white predominates over the dark mark- ings; the bill andfeet are whitish. This form is probably never seen in the United States. In var. zslandicus, dark markings predominate ; the bill and claws are dark; the crown is lighter than the back, and the dark moustaches are slight. This form occurs in New England, as a rare winter apparition. The var. sacer, the North American representative of /. gyrfalco of Northern Europe, is like the last, but with the crown darker than the back, and the moustaches heavy; it is believed to have been seen in New England. Var. odsoletus is still darker, quite blackish ; this form even breeds in New England. Dark-colored Gyrfalcons are of occasional occurrence in New England, notes to which effect run many years back in the history of the subject. Of late, one form, the darkest of all, has been ascertained to reside in Northern New England. Specimens supposed to repre- sent two other varieties have also been taken at various times. The form caxdicans has apparently never oc- curred, though the name has been repeatedly attached to New England examples of Gyrfalcon. Mr. Purdie has obligingly looked up the later records with the following result : F. gyrfalco obsoletus. Massachusetts, two instances: Breed’s Island, Boston Harbor, Oct., 1876, Cory, Nuttall Bull, ii, 1877, p. 27; Essex County, Purdie, ibid., iv, 1879, p. 189. Dumerston, Vermont, a rare resident, Brewer, Pr. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xvii, 1875, p. 444. Calais, Me., Brewer, ibid., xix, 1878, p. 306; Boardman, Pr. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., ix, 1862, p. 122, under name of “ &. candicans.” F. gyvfalco sacer (Forst.) Maine, Piscataquis Co., one instance, believed to be its first recognized occurrence in Eastern U. S., certainly the first in New England: Purdie, Nutt. Bull, iv, 1879, p. 188. (Does the “F FALCO PEREGRINUS: DUCK HAWK. II! gyrfalco” of Allen, Bull. Essex Inst. x, 1878, p. 21, No. 164, belong here or to the next form ?) F. gyvfalco islandicus. Rhode Island, one specimen, near Providence, winter of 1864-5: Allen, Am. Nat. iii, 1869, p. 513; this specimen, given by Allen as & sacer, has since been identified with zs/andicus; see Hist. N. A. Birds, iii, 1874, pp. 114, 115. Here may belong also the following records: F. tslandicus, Putnam, Pr. Essex Inst., i, 1856, p. 226, Seekonk Plains, Mass. (same record as quoted by Allen, Pr. Essex Inst. iv, 1864, p. 81, under name of F. candicans, and in part the same as quoted by Coues, Pr. Essex Inst., v, 1868, p. 254, under nameof / sacer). F. candt- cans, Verrill, Pr. Essex Inst., iii, 1862, p. 139; “not un- common” at Norway, Me. F. sacer, Maynard, Nat. Guide, 1870, p. 134, and Pr. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xiv, 1872, p. 382. HMzerofalco gyrfalco islandicus, Brown, Pr. Portland Soc. Nat. Hist., Apr. 1882; Portland, Me. DUCK HAWK: PEREGRINE FALCON. FALCO PEREGRINUS 7unstall. Chars. Tarsus feathered but a little way above in front, not longer than middle toe. First quill not shorter than third; second longest; first alone decidedly emarginate on inner web. Nostril with a central tubercle; bill toothed as in all the true Falcons. Length about 18 inches; wing, 13.00-14.00 ; tail, 7.00- 8.00. Above, blackish-ash, with more or less evident pale edg- ing of the feathers. Forehead and under parts white with more or less fulvous tinge, and blackish transverse bars; conspicuous black cheek patches. Young with the upper parts browner, the tawny shade below stronger, the under parts striped lengthwise. 112 FALCONIDZ : HAWKS, The Peregrine occurs at intervals in all suitable places in North America, and it is not a little remarkable that its extensive breeding range should have only lately been ascertained. Mr. Allen, with the assistance of Mr. C. W. Bennett and Dr. W. Wood, of East Windsor Hill, Connecticut, have been conspicuous in elaborating the history of the species, and especially in establishing the fact that it regularly breeds on several of the mountains in and near the Connecticut River Valley. Mr. Board- man reports the same item from Grand Menan, where, he says, the bird is resident, and regularly breeds on the cliffs. Dr. Wood, in the Hartford Times of June 20, 1861, states that four nearly fledged young were taken from a nest on Talcott Mountain, near Hartford, June 1, 1861, the female parent being shot. Writing in 1864 (Pr. Essex Inst., iv, 1864, p. 50), Mr, Allen states that Mr. Bennett took young birds, “a few years since,” on Mount Tom, near Springfield, Massachusetts. Shortly afterward, Mr. Allen announced the discovery of the eggs by Mr. Bennett, on Mount Tom, April 19, 1864; these were the first known to have been procured in New England, or, indeed, in the United States. The unusual interest attaching to his article induces us to quote at some length: FALCO PEREGRINUS : DUCK HAWK. 113 “ Although the Duck Hawk has been long known to breed at the localities in Massachusetts mentioned above [Mounts Tom and Holyoke], those conversant with the fact were not aware that any special interest was attached to it, or that its eggs and breeding-habits were very little known to ornithologists ; and so, until very recently, no particular efforts have been made to procure the eggs. Mr. Bennett, becoming aware of this, resolved to pro- cure the eggs. He accordingly visited Mount Tom for this purpose, April 6th of the present year [1864], when he searched the whole ridge of the mountain, dis- covered the old birds and the particular part they most frequented, and also the site of a nest, where the young had been raised. The old birds were continually near this spot, and manifested much solicitude when it was ap- proached, often flying within six or eight rods, and once the female came within three, screaming and thrusting out her talons, with an expression of great rage and fierceness. The birds did not appear at all shy, being easily approached quite nearly, though, in walking, the cracking of sticks and the clinking of splinters of trap- rock made no little noise. One ofthe birds appeared to keep close to the eyrie, and both would approach when- ever it was visited, screaming at and menacing the in- truder, notwithstanding that at that time there were no eggs. Mr. Bennett, suspecting that incubation had com- menced, visited the locality again on the 9th, but only saw the old nest, the birds behaving as before. Ten days later he made another visit, and, creeping carefully to the summit of the cliff, at a point near the eyrie already spoken of, he saw the female, on looking over the cliff, sitting on the nest, and but five or six yards distant. She eyed him fiercely for an instant, and then, scrambling II4 FALCONIDZ : HAWKS. from the nest to the edge of the narrow shelf supporting it, launched into the air. Ina twinkling Mr. Bennett’s unerring aim sent her tumbling dead at the foot of the precipice, several hundred feet below. The nest con- tained four eggs, which were soon safely secured, and the body of the female was obtained from the foot of the cliff. The male soon coming about was shot at, but he was too shy to come within range, excepting once, when the gun was being reloaded. The eggs were all laid after April 9, and their contents showed, April 19, that they had been incubated but a day or two. Incubation seems, in this case, to have commenced several weeks later than usual, which may have been owing to the late snows and unusual coldness of the weather this year dur- ing the first half of April. “ The situation of the eyrie was near the highest part of the mountain, about one-third of the length of the mountain from its south end, on a narrow shelf in the rock, eight or ten feet from the top of a nearly perpen- dicular cliff, 150 or 200 feet in height, and was inacces- ible except to a bold climber, and at one particular point. The nest was merely a slight excavation, sufficient to contain the eggs ; noaccessory material had been added. The site had been previously occupied, and probably for several years; and for weeks before the eggs were laid was carefully guarded by the bold and watchful birds.” These four eggs averaged 2.22 long by 1.68 broad, with 2.22 by 1.71, and 2.16 by 1.65 as maxima and minima, re- spectively. The smallest was larger than the one meas- ured by Dr. Brewer (2.00 by 1.56), which he obtained in Labrador. They also varied considerably in contour, and in heaviness and extent of coloration they showed a series from the darkest and most nearly uniform to the lightest FALCO PEREGRINUS: DUCK HAWK. IIs and most sparsely marked, in which latter the contrast between the white ground and the blotches was strik- ing. Of the darkest egg the writer says: ‘The gen- eral color is chocolate-brown, darker and more dense and uniform about the ends, the part about the middle being lighter, varied with small irregular blotches and specks of adarker tint than the ground color. The color of the smaller end isa nearly uniform dull red ochre. There is also an irregular belt of scattered and apparently very superficial blotches of very dark brown or nearly black.” Two other eggs, as already mentioned, graded toward the lightest, which isthusdescribed: ‘The greater end of the egg, which in the egg of most birds is the end most subject to markings and to the greatest depth of color, is white, sprinkled sparingly with reddish specks ; while the smaller end is deep bright brick-red, here andthere re- lieved by small specks and patches of white ground color. About the middle of the egg the colors are in more equal proportions, the white patches becoming larger on the smaller end toward the middle, and the red patches on the larger end increase toward the same point, where the colors meet and become mixed in irregular patches of various sizes, from mere dots to blotches.” Mr. Allen continues the subject in his latter communi- cation to the American Naturalist (iii, 1869, p. 514). “One or more pairs of these birds have been seen about Mounts Tom and Holyoke every season since the first discovery of their eggs at the former locality, in 1864. Mr. Bennett has since carefully watched them, and his frequent laborious searches for their nests have been well rewarded. In 1866 he took a second set of eggs, three in number, from the eyrie previously occupied. In 1867 the male bird was killed late in April, and this 116 FALCONID : HAWKS. apparently prevented their breeding there that year, as they probably otherwise would have done; at least no nest was that year discovered. In 1868 Hawks of this species were seen about the mountains, and, although they reared their young there, all effort to discover their nest was ineffectual. The present year (1869) they commenced to lay in the old nesting-place, but as they were robbed when but one egg had been deposited, they deserted it, and chose a site still more inaccessible. Here they were equally unfortunate ; for, during a visit to the mountain in company with Mr. Bennett, April 28, we had the pleasure of discovering their second eyrie, and from which, with considerable difficulty, three freshly- laid eggs were obtained. Not discouraged by this second misfortune, they nested again, this time de- positing their eggs in the old eyrie, from which all, excepting the last set of eggs, have been obtained. Again they were unfortunate, Mr. Bennett remov- ing their second set of eggs, three in number, May 23, at which time incubation had just commenced. The birds remained about the mountain all the summer, and, from the anxiety they manifested in August, it appears not improbable that they laid a third time, and at this late period had unfledged young. See also the interesting article by Dr. Wood in the American Naturalist, v, 1871, p. 82. Our latest accounts of the nidification are given by Mr. F. H. Knowlton in the Nuttall Bulletin, v, 1880, p. 57, from observations made at Brandon, Vermont, where a pair of Duck Hawks are known to have bred for more than twenty years. As to the distribution of the Duck Hawk in New England there is little to note, the bird being of general though infrequent or irregular occurrence, excepting in FALCO COLUMBARIUS : PIGEON HAWK. II7 the particular localities to which it happens to resort to breed. Mr. Allen cites it for Massachusetts as a “rare resident ; more common in winter than in sum- mer, and along the coast than in the interior.’ Its breeding in Connecticut, where, however, it is not a common bird, has already been noted. Mr. N. C. Brown has lately instanced the only case of its occur- rence near Portland, which has come to his knowledge. PIGEON FALCON: PIGEON HAWK. FaLco COLUMBARIUS L, Chars. Tarsus scarcely feathered above, with the plates in front enlarged, appearing like a double row of alternating scutella (and often with a few true scutellaat base) ; 1st and 2d quills emargi- nate on inner web. Adult male above ashy-blue, sometimes al- most blackish, sometimes much paler; below pale fulvous, or ochraceous, whitish on the throat, the breast and sides with large oblong dark brown spots with black shaft lines ; the tibia reddish, streaked with brown; inner webs of primaries with about eight transverse white or whitish spots; tail tipped with white, and with the outer feather whitening; with a broad subterminal black zone and 3-4 black bands alternating with whitish ; cere greenish-yellow, feet yellow. Female with the upper parts ashy- brown ; the tail with 4-5 indistinct whitish bands. Length, about 13.00; wing, 8.00; tail, 5.00; male smaller. Observe that Accz- piter fuscus is also called “ pigeon hawk.” According to Dr. Brewer, this spirited little falcon is a migratory visitant in Southern, and a summer resident in Northern New England. Dr. Coues says: ‘“ Gener- ally distributed, not abundant; resident; breeds at least as farsouth as Massachusetts. Individuals are of general occurrence throughout New England.” Mr. J. N. Clark 118 FALCONIDA : HAWKS. records it from Saybrook, Ct. “as very common in the migrations.” Mr. Allen says for Massachusetts : “rather rare, chiefly occurring in spring, fall, and win- ter;” and Mr. Merriam says: “that in Connecticut, it is not uncommon in spring and fall, and has been ob- served in May, June, and July, with the inference of its breeding in that state.” There has been so much doubt and uncertainty regard- ing the eggs of this Falcon, that we are the more pleased to offer an unquestionable description, derived from ex- amination of specimens in the Smithsonian. The size varies from 1.50 by 1.30 to 1.80 by 1.30—figures also indicating the range of variation in shape, some being subspherical, others elongate-oval. Coloration ranges from a nearly uniform deep rich brown (chestnut or burnt sienna), to whitish or white only, marked with a few indistinct dots of dull grayishor drab. Such ex- tremes are connected by every degree ; a yellowish-brown ground-color, irregularly splashed with rich ruddy brown, is the usual style. The markings may be very evenly distributed, or mostly gathered in a wreath around one or the other end, or even both ends. RUSTY-CROWNED FALCON: SPARROW HAWK. FALco SPARVERIUS L. Chars. Crown ashy-blue, with a chestnut patch, sometimes small or altogether wanting, sometimes occupying nearly all the crown ; conspicuous black maxillary and auricular patches, which with three others around the nape make seven black places in all, but a part of them often obscure or wanting; back cinnamon brown, in the male with a few black spots or none, in the female FALCO SPARVERIUS: SPARROW HAWK. 12 fe) with numerous black bars ; wing coverts in the male ashy-blue, with or without black spots, in the female like the back ; quills in both sexes blackish with numerous pale or white bars on the inner webs; tail chestnut, in the male with one broad black subterminal bar, white tip, and outer feather mostly white with several black bars ; in the male the whole tail with numerous im- perfect black bars; below white, variously tinged with buff, or tawny, in the male with a few black spots or none, in the fe- male with many brown streaks ; throat and vent nearly white and immaculate in both sexes; bill dark horn, cere and feet yellow to bright orange. Length, 10.00-11.00; wing, 7.00 ; tail, 5.00, more or less. This elegant little Hawk will be immediately recog- nized by its small size, and entirely peculiar coloration, although the plumage varies almost interminably. It isa common New England bird, 7” and resident, though less numerous in winter than at other seasons. It is also somewhat locally distributed. Thus, I have found it to be quite abundant in the vicinity of Amherst, where nests are found nearly every year, and specimens are frequently procured. As far as I can ascertain, it builds no nest, but lays its eggs in the hollow of a tree, usually twenty or thirty feet from the ground, or even more. Dr. Wood has described a novel site chosen by a pair at Granby, Connecticut, who attacked and killed a pair of doves, took possession of the dove-house, which was inside a barn with holes leading outward, and made themselves quite at home; they laid foureggs, and began to incu- bate, with the evident intention of feeding on the farmer's _ Fic. 23.—Sparrow Hawk. 120 FALCONIDE : HAWKS. chickens: so they died the death. Five or six eggs ap- pear to be the usual nest-full; seven are stated to have been found in one clutch. They are nearly spheroidal, measuring about 1.33 in length by 1.12 in breadth. The ground-color is usually buffy, or pale yellowish-brown ; this is blotched all over with dark brown, the splashes of which are usually largest and most numerous toward the greater end, at or around which they may run into a crown or wreath. Some eggs are pale brown, minutely dotted all over with dark brown; some are white, with pale brown spots; and a few are whitish, without any markings. It isa known fact that this Hawk will lay again in the same nest if robbed of its eggs. An instance is recorded of two sets of five eggs being taken in succession from one nest. I have successfully reared the young, which exhibited affectionate docility, refusing to leave when set at liberty and returning at intervals to be replaced in its cage. Dr. Coues narrates that while he was at Columbia, in South Carolina, a neighbor had three Sparrow Hawks for some time. As they had been taken from the nest when quite young, they became in a measure reconciled to captivity. They ate any kind of meat freely, and as they grew up, began to display much of their natural spirit. When tormented in the various ingenious ways people have of “stirring up” caged birds, they would resent the indig- nity by snapping the bill, beating with the wings, and clutching with their talons at the offending cane or um- brella tip. One of them was a cripple, having a broken leg very badly set, and the other two used to bully him dreadfully. One night, whether from not having been fed sufficiently, or being in unusual bad humor, they set » upon him, killed him outright, and almost devoured him. BUTEO BOREALIS: RED-TAILED BUZZARD. 121 RED-TAILED BUZZARD: HEN HAWK. BUTEO BOREALIS Gm. Chars. Adult dark brown above, many feathers with pale or tawny margins, and upper tail-coverts showing much whitish; below white or reddish-white, with various spots and streaks of different shades of brown, generally forming an irregular zone on the abdo- men ; ¢adl above bright chestnut red, with subterminal black zone and narrow whitish tip, below pearly gray ; wing-coverts dark. Young with the tail grayish-brown closely barred with darker, the upper parts with tawny streaking, the under parts white with dark markings, usually wanting on the breast. The young are a long time in acquiring the full plumage. They are long full grown before the red of the tail appears, and this is usually in advance of the fulvous of the under parts that the old birds display. I have seen specimens with nearly perfect red tail, yet showing pure white on the breast and the same elsewhere underneath, though marked with the usual dark-brown spots and streaks. A large stoutly- built hawk ; female 23.00; wing, 15.50; extent, 50.00 or more ; tail 8.50 ; male 20.00 ; wing, 14.00 ; tail 7.00. Hour outer primaries emarginate on inner webs; tarsus short, stout, extensively feathered above. This is the largest and most powerful of the Buzzard Hawks, and only exceeded in these respects by the Gyrfalcons. It is a permanent resident, and one gener- ally distributed. You may see the great bird perched erect and watchful, on some lone tree that gives command of a wide horizon, no less mistrustful of the approach of man than confident of its own ability to capture the quarry its keen eye is so eager to descry; or you may notice it again, single or two together, circling high over head in graceful gyration with motionless wings, ever and again sending forth its shrill note of defiance. Still it is on the whole of sluggish and heavy disposition, 122 FALCONIDZ: HAWKS. and is unfitted as well by physical organization for the deeds of daring address, for which the Fadcones and Astures are so famous. It is not quick enough to strike \ Fic. 24. —ReEp-TaiLep Buzzarp, birds on the wing, and perforce contents itself with humbler, less active and more defenceless game. These Buzzards mate early, constructing a large and bulky, though shallow, nest in‘a high tree, of sticks and BUTEO LINEATUS : RED-SHOULDERED BUZZARD. 123 smaller twigs, mixed toward the centre with grass, moss, or other soft material, and often a few feathers. The same nest is often used during successive years. The eggs are generally three in number, sometimes two or four, about 2.40 long by rather less than 2.00 broad. They are dull whitish in color, sometimes with only a few markings of dull brownish-gray, but oftener extensively blotched with several shades of rich brown. They may be looked for in April, the young usually being out by the end of that month. RED-SHOULDERED BUZZARD; WINTER HAWK. BuTeo LinEatus (Gm.) Jard. Chars. General plumage of the adult of a rich fw/vous cast; above, reddish-brown, the feathers with dark brown centres; below a lighter shade of the same, with narrow dark streaks and white bars ; quills and tail blackish, conspicuously banded with pure white, che bend of the wing orange-brown. Young plain dark “brown above, below white with dark streaks; quills and tail barred with whitish. Nearly as Jong as B. borealis, but not nearly so heavy; tarsi more naked; female 22.00; extent, 48.00 ; wing, 14.00; tail, 9.00; male 19.00; wing, 13.00; tail, 8.00. This is the most abundant of all our large hawks, resident throughout the year, and in fact the usual representative of its tribe in winter. Its habits are in all respects similar to those of the Red-tail, though it is inferior in size and strength. The nest is much the same in character, but smaller, more likely to be farther from the main stem of a tree; it is said to be not so long reoccupied. The eggs, as usual, have a wide range of 124 FALCONIDA : HAWKS. variability in size and color, but they are usually more highly-colored than those of the Red-tail, just as the general plumage of the bird is, the pale or nearly white varieties being rare. In size they range from 2.00 to 2.25 in length by about 1.75 in breadth; the usual number is three or four, sometimes five, and even six have been found in the nest in one instance. SWAINSON’S BUZZARD. BuTEeo swainsoni Bp. Chars. Three outer quills emarginate on outer web. Extremely variable in color, but usually showing a broad dark pectoral band contrasted with light surroundings and numerous (8-12) narrow dark tail bars. A smaller bird than the foregoing; female about 20.00; wing, 16.00; tail, 8.50; male less; not so stoutly built; wings and tail relatively longer ; chiefly Western North America, also Canada and Massachusetts. A western species, of casual occur- rence in our country, thus far in two known instances. Mr. Wm. Brewster sums up the evidence of this rare visitor as follows: “The claim of the above-named species to be regarded as a bird of New England has hitherto rested solely upon a specimen in melanistic plumage (formerly specifically separated as B. zusignatus) shot a few years since at Salem, Mass., and now in the Museum of the Peabody Academy (as recorded by Allen, Bull. Essex Inst., x, 1878, p. 22). It is with pleasure that I can now announce the capture of a second indi- vidual at Wayland, Mass., on or about September 12, 1876, Through the kindness of Mr. Arthur Smith, of Brookline, to whom it was originally sent in the flesh, this bird has recently come into my possession. It isa BUTEO PENNSYLVANICUS : BROAD-WINGED BUZZARD, 125 young male in nearly perfect autumnal dress, and though not typically melanistic, it still inclines strongly towards that condition.” (Bull. Nutt. Club, iii, 1878, p. 39.) BROAD-WINGED BUZZARD. BuTEO PENNSYLVANICUS (Wils.) Bp. Chars. Above, umber-brown, the feathers with paler, or even with fulvous or ashy-white, edging, those of the hind head and nape cottony-white at base ; quills blackish, most of the inner webs white, barred with dusky; tail with about three broad dark zones alternating with narrow white ones, and white-tipped; conspicu- ous dusky maxillary patches ; under parts white, or tawny, variously streaked, spotted or barred with rusty or rufous, this color usually predominating in adult birds, when the white chiefly appears as oval or circular spots on each feather ; throat gener- ally whiter than elsewhere, narrowly dark-lined. In the young, the upper parts are duller brown, varied with white, the under parts tawny-whitish with linear and oblong dark spots, the tail grayish-brown with numerous dark bars. Female 18.00; extent, 40.00; wing, 11.00; tail, 7.00; male less. A rather small but stout species, with short broad wings, very different from any of the foregoing ; the maxillary patches are a strong feature. A resident species in New England, but less common than the Red-tail or Red-shoulder, and seldom to be seen in winter, when probably only in southern portions. The general habits are not peculiar in comparison with those of its allies, and the nidification is similar. Mr. Samuels states that a nest he visited the 2oth of May, 1864, in West Roxbury, Massachusetts, was built in the fork of a tall pine-tree, near the top, and composed of coarse sticks and twigs, lined with red cedar bark, leaves, and feathers. It contained four eggs, measuring 126 FALCONID : HAWKS. from 2.00 to 2.15 long, by 1.70 to 1.72 broad; dirty yellowish-white, covered more or less thickly in the different specimens with spots and blotches of reddish- brown. Other specimens had fainter markings, while in others, again, the spots were finer and darker. The nest, of which little was learned until of late years, has been found frequently in Massachusetts, near Boston, Springfield, Williamstown, Newton, West Roxbury, and Leverett; in the latter place, on Mount Toby, the bird is apparently a regular breeder, both on the Leverett and on the Sunderland side. In Connecticut, Mr. Merriam says: It breeds sparingly about New Haven, and Mr. W. W. Coe has taken quite a number of their nests, together with several of the finest birds that I have ever seen in the vicinity of Portland, Conn. (B. Conn. 1877, p. 87.) ROUGH-LEGGED BUZZARD. ARCHIBUTEO LAGOPUS SANCT-JOHANNIS (Gm.) Ridg. Chars. Large hawks with the tarsi feathered in front to the toes; about 2 feet long; wing 16.00-18.00 ; tail 8.00-10.00. Four outer primaries emarginate on inner web. Below, white, variously dark-marked, and often with a broad black abdominal zone; but generally no ferruginous. North America; abundant. The so-called “black hawk” is a melanotic state, in which the whole plumage is nearly uniform blackish. This large Hawk, in black or the other plumage easily recognized by the feathered shank, is a north- erner ; seldom, if ever, found in summer in our country; though the black variety is given by Dr. Brewer as resident in Maine. It is a bird of very irregular distri- bution ; being particularly attached to low wet meadows, PANDION HALIAETUS: OSPREY; FISH HAWK. 127 such as are affected by the Harriers and Short-eared Owls, it is almost necessarily local and scattering. Though of great size, its prey is very humble, consisting chiefly of mice, reptiles, and insects. The nest is placed indifferently on trees or cliffs. The eggs, three or four in number, and measuring about 2} by 1 inches, run through the usual variations, from dull whitish, scarcely or not at all marked, to drab or creamy, largely blotched with different shades of brown, sometimes mixed with purplish slate markings. Although belonging to a group technically said to be “ruling” Buzzards (“ Avchibuteo”’), it is difficult to see where the claim to royal purple lies in this species and others of the same genus, for they certainly lack the qualities that go to make hawks famous. Viewing their splendid presence, we wonder, as a late writer says, “that the object of such an admirable organization is nothing more important than the destruction df the smallest and most defenceless of quadrupeds or of reptiles. Yet such is apparently the case. Many of the birds of this group, though powerful in structure, and furnished with the usual apparatus of strong and sharp bill and claws, and other accompaniments of predatory habits, rarely attack any animal more formidable than a mouse or ground squirrel, or in some cases a frog or other of the weaker species of reptiles.” OSPREY; FISH HAWK. PANDION HALIAETUS (ZL.) Sav. Chars. Plumage lacking aftershafts, compact, imbricated, oily, to resist water; that of the legs short and close, not forming the 128 FALCONID !: HAWKS, flowing tufts seen in most other genera, that of the head length- ened, acuminate; primary coverts stiff and acuminate. Feet immensely large and strong, the tarsus entirely naked, granular- reticulate, the toes all of the same length, unwebbed at base, very scabrous underneath, the outer versatile; claws very large, rounded underneath. Hook of the bill long ; nostrils touching edge of the cere. Above, dark brown; most of the head and neck, and the under parts white, latter sometimes with a tawny shade, and streaked with brown. 2 feet long ; wing, 18.00-20.00 inches; tail, 8.00-10.00. A summer resident along the coast, common in South- ern and less so in Northern New England. This large hawk, so peculiar in form and aspect, differing so widely from others in technical characters, and so remarkable in the nature of its food and manner of procuring it, is one of the most regularly migratory of its tribe, coming over our limits late in March and remaining until November. Its movements, in spring at least, are related to some extent to the migrations of the fish which form its exclusive diet. The manner of procuring these animals is the same as the Kingfisher’s, by plung- ing down from on high, but the quarry is seized with the talons, of course, not with the beak. The piscatorial habits of this bird restrict its residence to the coast and the larger inland waters. Its numbers are uncertain in different localities to all appearance equally eligible, and in some places appear to have diminished of late years from some unassignable cause. Speaking of Massachu- setts, Mr. Allen has lately said that the Fish Hawk formerly bred in the State, but now probably nests there very rarely if at all; and Mr. Minot’s remarks on the subject are to like effect. Our advices from Con- necticut are the most explicit and interesting of any we possess. “Mr. W. W. Coe informs me,” writes Mr. PANDION HALIAETUS: OSPREY; FISH HAWK. 129 Merriam, “that Fish Hawks do not breed so far up the Connecticut River as Middletown and Portland, but are common at its mouth (about Saybrook), and that he has taken their nests, along the Sound, all the way from Fic. 25.—Fish Hawk. Saybrook to New London. Immense numbers of them breed regularly at Plumb Island, Conn., where I saw, last Spring, at least five hundred nests, and over a thousand birds. There is only one small piece of timber on the island, and every tree contains a Fish-Hawk’s nest, or from eight to ten Night Herons’ nests. There 130 FALCONID : HAWKS, is quite a colony of Night Herons there. There being not trees enough for the Hawks to nest in, many of them build on the ground, and some lay their eggs in the sand. They occupy the same nest for years, adding a little to it each season, till some of them, that were originally placed flat on the ground, had become so large that I could not look into them; they were seven feet high and measured six or eight feet across the top! On the 4th of June I found both young birds and fresh eggs in some of the nests. The Crow Blackbirds had built their nests in among the large sticks of the Fish Hawk’s nests, there being often four or five of the former placed about the sides of one of the latter.” (B. Conn., 1877, p. 89.) The eggs of the Fish Hawk run through all the varieties of coloration usual in this family, from white to creamy, tawny, and reddish ground color, with a few pale brown markings or very boldly blotched with the richest shades of sienna, burnt umber, bistre and sepia. There is usually a great deal of reddish in the spotting as well as the ground color, and the “mahogany” samples make very handsome objects. The size is very variable : a specimen before us measures an inch and a half in the conjugate by two and three-quarters through the major axis, GOLDEN EAGLE. AQUILA CHRYSAETUS (L.) Cuv, Chars. Tarsus completely feathered. Dark brown with a purplish gloss; lanceolate feathers of head and neck, golden-brown; quills blackish; in the young, tail white, with a broad terminal black zone. About 3 feet long; wing upwards of 2 feet; tail a AQUILA CHRYSAETUS : GOLDEN EAGLE. 131 foot or more. North America, rather northerly, in winter south ordinarily to about 35°. This great bird is celebrated on a principle well eluci- dated by Mr. Minot, who says: “Size has always a fascination for the world. The young collector prizes a hawk’s egg more than that of the rarest warbler. The egg is big, the bird that lays it is big, the nest in which it was laid is big, the tree in which the nest was built is big, and the wood in which the tree grows is big.” And so were the exploits of Jack with the bean-stalk. But the Golden Eagle is simply a hawk of unusual dimen- sions, little distinguished from the Rough-legged Buzzard except in size. It is of infrequent and irregular occur- rence throughout New England, nesting anywhere that offers suitable crags for the location of its eyrie, and for the rest roaming about for food like any other bird of prey. In Mr. Allen’s report of 1878, the cases recorded from Massachusetts are Monson, November, 1864; Deerfield, December 14, 1865; Westfield, three speci- mens, 1866; and Fairhaven, November 21, 1873. “Dr. Wm. Wood has seen them near Hartford, Connecticut ; while in that same State specimens have been taken by Mr. J. N. Clark, Saybrook; and by Mr. Henry Flint, at Deep River. Mr. Hiram Cutting informs us that it is not a scarce bird in Vermont, where he has found its nest, and several times secured the young. Dr. Coues has given the following description of the eggs :— “ Dr. Brewer gives it as breeding in the mountainous portions of Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, and New York, particularly instancing a nest at Franconia, New Hamp- shire, which was resorted to for several successive years. But its nidification is usually in such inaccessible situations, even when not in the most remote and unin- 132 FALCONIDZ : HAWKS, habitable regions, that its eggs were for a long time special desiderata. Even in 1857, Dr. Brewer had no American specimens for description. I have, therefore, more pleasure in describing them, from no less than a dozen examples now in the Smithsonian, where, through the liberality marking the attitude of that institution toward students of science, I have been able to examine them. The eggs are almost spherical, the degree of prolation being slight, and there being usually no appreciable difference in the shape of the opposite ends. Four selected specimens measure, respectively, 2.65 by 2.15 ; 2.90 by 2.40; 3.00 by 2.35; 3.10 by 2.25 — figures illustrating both the difference in absolute size and the variation in shape. None are so large as the one said by Audubon to have been 3.50 by 2.50; but I can readily believe that such dimensions are sometimes reached. Among the twelve, only one is white and unmarked; this closely resembles a Bald Eagle’s. The rest are whitish (white, shaded just perceptibly with neutral tint), variously spotted and splashed, without the slightest approach to uniformity in the size, number, or pattern of the markings. The color ranges from “bloody-brown ” or rich sienna, to bistre and umber. There are many other spots, more or less obscure, and all apparently below the surface, showing grayish, drab, purplish, and neutral tint, by overlaying of the whitish calcareous matter in different thicknesses. Most of the markings are sharp-edged and distinct, but others shade off gradually, while many are confluent, making irregular patches. Asa rule they are pretty evenly distributed, but in some specimens are chiefly gathered about one or the other end, where the coloration consequently becomes confluent.” HALIAETUS LEUCOCEPHALUS: BALD EAGLE, 133 Fic. 26.— BaLp EaGue. BALD EAGLE. HALIAETUS LEUCOCEPHALUS (Z.) Sav. Chars. Tarsus naked. Dark brown; head and tail white after the third year; before this, these parts like the rest of the plumage. About the size of the last species. Immature birds average larger than the adults ; the famous “ Bird of Washington” is a 134 FALCONIDZ : HAWKS. case in point. North America, common ; piscivorous; a pirati- cal parasite of the osprey ; otherwise notorious as the emblem of the Republic. From the circumstance that several years (at least three) are required for the gaining of the perfect plumage, when the head and tail are entirely white, it follows that “Gray Eagles” and “Birds of Washington” are the more frequently met with. Those who, unpractised in ornithology, may be puzzled by accounts of numerous different kinds of Eagles, may be relieved to know that only two species have ever been found in the United States. In any plumage they may instantly be recognized by the legs — feathered to the toes in Aguila chry- saétus, naked on the whole shank in Haliagtus leucocephalus. The Bald Eagle appears to have decreased in numbers of late years, to judge by comparison of earlier with more recent notices of its occurrence. Still it is to be called no uncommon bird, of general dispersion along the coast and the larger water courses, nesting wherever a convenient site for its eyrie can be found in places sufficiently secluded to give the bird a sense of security. The nest is commonly built in a tree—a huge affair, doubtless the largest structure of the kind to be found high in trees in our country, unless some of the augmented fabrics of the Fish Hawk should exceed it in bulk. The eggs are easily recognized by their size, and lack of the spotting usually observed on those of diurnal Raptores. They are commonly two in number, about three inches in length, by a scant two-and-a-half inches in breadth, and of a dull soiled white color. CATHARTES AURA: TURKEY BUZZARD. 135 FAMILY CATHARTIDA®*: AMERICAN VULTURES. TURKEY BUZZARD. CATHARTES AURA (L.) LU. Chars. Blackish brown ; quills ashy gray on their under surface ; head red; feet flesh-colored ; bill white. Skin of head corru- gated, sparsely beset with bristle-like feathers ; plumage com- mencing in a circle on the neck ; nostrils very large and open; tail rounded. Length, about 2 feet; extent, 6.00; wing, 2.00; tail, 1.00. This well-known bird is entered on Dr. Coues’ list of 1868 as a rare or occasional visitor, chiefly in more southern portions of New England, with note of one Maine occurrence, and of its regular presence in summer near Chatham, and along the shores of Lake Sinclair, in Canada West. Mr. Merriam has later given an excel- lent résumé of occurrences, which we transcribe : “ A rare visitor from the south, at present, although once ‘not uncommon,’ according to Linsley, who further states: ‘I have known it in Connecticut from a child, having at that period counted twenty in a flock in * The American genera Sarcorhamphus, Pseudogryphus, Ca- thartes, and Catharista form a group of superfamily value, which may be termed CATHARTIDES, constituting one of the primary divisions of the Aapzores or Birds of Prey, the others being Gyfo- gerant, Accipitres proper (incl. Vulturide) and Striges, though more different from the others collectively than these are from one another.— C, 136 CATHARTID#A : AMERICAN VULTURES. Northford in the month of August.’ Mr. Grinnell tells me that one was shot at the mouth of the Housatonic River, Conn., in June, 1875, by C. Merwin, of Milford Fic. 27.— CALIFORNIAN VULTURE, to illustrate Cathartide. Point. Turkey Buzzards have been observed at Say- brook, Conn., by Mr. J. N. Clark, as recorded by Purdie (Am. Nat., vii, 1873, p. 693); two were taken in Massa- chusetts (Samuels, Cat. B. Mass., 1864, p. 3); and one CATHARISTA ATRATA: CARRION CROW. 137 even strayed as far to the north as Calais, Maine, where it was captured by Mr. G. A. Boardman (recorded by Prof. A. E. Verrill, Pr. Bost. Soc., ix, 1862, p. 122): Dr. Wood tells me one was seen, feeding on carrion, near East Windsor, Conn., only three years ago (1874). The Rev. J. Howard Hand writes me as follows, concerning the occurrence of Turkey Buzzards in Connecticut: ‘I took one specimen at Cromwell, Conn., Sept. 23d, 1874; also one at Westbrook, Conn., Oct. 16th, 1875, and again, eight specimens on Oct. 18th (two days after- wards). They are not common.’ Dr. Wm. O. Ayres writes me that he took one at New Haven in 1853.” (B. Conn. 1877, p. 91.) The columns of Forest and Stream contain several notices of New England occurrences. Mr. Everett Smith notes the capture of a specimen in a steel trap at Cumberland, Maine (iii, No. 21, p. 324). One was shot where Eutaw, Greene County, Vt., now stands (iv, No. 1, p. 5). Three were seen on the island of Grand Menan, in April, 1875, and one of them was shot (J. T. C. Moses, v, No. 3, p. 36). Mr. Maynard speaks of one seen at Waltham, Mass., in August, 1867 (Nat. Guide, 1870, p. 137); and Mr. Purdie’s manuscript makes us aware of two later Massa- chusetts instances. CARRION CROW. CATHARISTA ATRATA (Bartr.) Less. Chars. Blackish ; quills very pale, almost whitish, on the under surface ; head dusky ; bill and feet grayish-yellow. Skin of head as in the last species, but plumage running up the back of neck 138 CATHARTID : AMERICAN VULTURES. to a point on the hind head; nostrils as before ; tail square. Smaller than avzra in linear dimensions, but a heavier bird ; length about 2 feet; wing, 1.33; tail, 0.66. This species is of still less frequent occurrence than the last, its normal range in the United States not extending beyond the Carolinas. One was taken in Swampscott, Mass., November, 1850, by Mr. S. Jillson, as given by Mr. F. W. Putnam (Pr. Essex Inst., i, 1856, p. 223). Another at Gloucester, Mass., Sept. 28, 1863, which Mr. J. A. Allen cites (zdzd. iv, 1864, p. 81), as he does the capture of one and the observation of several others at Hudson (Am. Nat., iii, 1870, p. 646). Mr. G. A. Boardman speaks of one killed at Calais, Maine (Am. Nat., iii, 1869, p. 498); and Mr. Ruthven Deane gives another Maine record (Campobello, about August, 1879, Bull. Nutt. Club, v, 1880, p. 63). These are the authen- tic cases which have come to our knowledge: for a du- bious Connecticut record, see Merriam, B. Conn., 1877, P. 93. ECTOPISTUS MIGRATORIUS : PASSENGER PIGEON. 139 FAMILY COLUMBID&: PIGEONS. PASSENGER PIGEON: WILD PIGEON. ECTOPISTES MIGRATORIUS (L.) Sw. Chars. Tail, 12-feathered, long and wedge-shaped; outer tail- feathers black, white and chestnut. Neck with metallic irides- cence. Wing-coverts spotted with black. Male with the under parts pale purplish-red, fading behind, the sides grayish-blue like the upper parts. Female and young lacking the rich color of the breast, which is grayish, more like the upper parts. Bill, black. Eyes and feet, red. Length, about 16.00; wing, 8.00-9.00; tail little less. Comparatively few of the descendants of myriads which in former generations of passenger pigeons dark- ened the air in New England are left to us now, though thousands still appear among us during the migrations, and some of them still construct the open- work platforms of twigs, through the interstices of which you may from below observe the snowy white egg or pair of eggs entrusted to these frail receptacles. Civili- zation has pushed the Pigeons before it, by depriving them to a great extent of the formerly inexhaustible store of mast they enjoyed, for which the fields of buck- wheat or other cultivated grains are no adequate substi- tute. The greatest flights and roosts of Pigeons we now hear of are in the Northwestern States, — say the upper Mississippi Valley at large—where the numbers of the birds are still prodigious, furnishing no incon- siderable commercial item, as well as the usual substi- 140 COLUMBID : PIGEONS. tutes for domestic pigeons in those contests of skill between sportsmen which our most prominently mis- guided misanthrope, Mr. Henry Bergh, has so long vainly essayed to suppress. The works of sundry authors who treat of Pigeons contain a large store of eligible reading matter on the subject of this Pigeon, which the limitations of our own treatise forbid us to transcribe, or even reproduce in substance ; and we have no new information to offer in its stead. Fic. 28.—Witp PIGEON. The eggs are one or two in number, pure white in color, of elliptical shape, measuring about 1.50 by 1.10, and are laid from April to June. WILD DOVE: MOURNING DOVE. ZENAIDURA CAROLINENSIS (L.) Bg. Chars. Tail, 14-feathered, long and wedge-shaped, colored much like that of the Wild Pigeon, but lacking chestnut on the outer ZENAIDURA CAROLINENSIS: WILD DOVE. I4I quills. | General coloration and sexual differences much the same as in the Wild Pigeon. A velvety-black spot on the side of the head, and others on the wings, the former wanting in the Pigeon. Much smaller. Length, about 12.00; extent, 17.00; wing, 5.50—6.00 ; tail about the same. This is a common summer resident with us, occasion- ally remaining through the winter, as the Wild Pigeon also sometimes does. Though often seen in companies of some extent, it is not particularly gregarious, and is generally dispersed in pairs or singly through the woods Fic. 29. — Hap anD Foot or Mourninc Dove, Natural size. and fields. In the autumn, however, similarity of tastes and needs generally brings many individuals together at eligible feeding grounds. It is naturally a gentle and confiding bird, but is subject to such persecution from the gunners that it is usually considered wild and shy. In portions of the country where it is seldom molested, few birds are less timid in the presence of man. Dur- ing the breeding season, generally May in New Eng- land, the woods resound with the cooing of the ardent and affectionate creatures; but at other seasons the Dove is a remarkably silent bird. The eggs are usually two in number, pure white, elliptical, measuring 1.10 by 0.85. The nest is placed indifferently upon a tree or bush, 142 COLUMBID : PIGEONS. stump or log, or even on the ground — oftenest in the fork of some branch at no great elevation; it is always slight and frail, open-worked of twigs, with little or no softer material. The arrivals are mostly during the latter part of April, and the pairing and cooing begin as soon as a residence is selected. The greater number depart in October, only hardy loiterers remaining during the inclement season. The migrations are thus more orderly and regular than the movements of the Wild Pigeon, which wanders with such wayward and irresist- ible impulse in search of food. At the same time, it cannot be denied that in New England the distribution of the species is quite local, the birds being not uncom- mon in places where the food they prefer is most plen- tiful and accessible, yet scarcely known in neighboring localities. They are extremely fond of buckwheat ; and regions where the grain is cultivated always furnish Doves in season. The same restriction and partial dis- tribution occurs in the arid regions of the southwestern territories, but for a different reason — the scarcity of water. In Arizona, for example, there is no water-hole in all that parched land without its Doves, though the birds will scarcely be seen in the intervening desert reaches. Most of the Arizona “rivers” have no water in them; and in that extraordinary country, where everything goes by contraries, the sight of a Dove is a surer sign of water than the site of a stream. The Dove there shows the opposite character it acquired in the days of Noah, as a herald of dry land. NOTE ON THE WILD TURKEY. 143 FAMILY MELEAGRIDID&@: TURKEYS. NOTE ON THE WILD TURKEY. There is no longer a doubt of the extirpation of this noble bird in New England. I have been at some pains to examine the records, and am satisfied of its entire extinction. A few words will, however, be pertinent to the history of the case. The bird was formerly abundant in southern New England, as attested by all the earlier writings which touch upon the case. Their number must have been so much thinned out during the last century that the period of their plenty ceased about the beginning of the present, if not somewhat earlier. The Rev. Mr. Linsley’s record is especially notewor- thy. Writing in 1843, he says: “The last Wild Turkey that I have known in New England was taken by a re- lative of mine, about thirty years since, on Totoket Mountain, in Northford. It was overtaken in a deep snow, and thereby outrun.” (Am. Jour. Sci., xliv, 1843, p. 264.) About the same time Zadock Thompson represented that Turkeys continued to visit and breed upon the mountains in southern parts of Vermont. (Hist. Ver- mont, 1842, p. IOT.) The Turkey appears to have lingered longest in the mountainous parts of Massachusetts. Though Prof. Emmons considered it nearly extinct in that State in 1833, it was said by Prof. Hitchcock to be at that time “frequently” found on Mt. Holyoke (Rep. Geol. etc., Mass., 1833, Pp. 549). 144 MELEAGRIDIDA : TURKEYS, Mr. Merriam’s model paper gives us in this, as in so many other cases, very valuable information. “ Profes- sor W. D. Whitney once mounted a fine specimen of the Wild Turkey, killed on Mt. Tom, Mass., Nov. Ist, 1847. It may now be seen in the beautiful case of birds given by Prof. Whitney to the Peabody Museum of Yale College, and is of particular value as being, in all pro- bability, the last of its race seen in that State.” (Rev. B. Conn., 1877, p. 99.) Dr. Brewer retains it in his list of 1875, with the re- mar! : “resident, probably extinct.” (Pr. Bost. Soc. Nat. Hist., xvii, 1875, p. 445.) The highest authority now writing upon the Birds of New England —I mean Mr. Allen, of course — agrees to the substance of the statements here given, in the latest note he has left upon the subject. ‘Well known,” he says, ‘to have been a common species in southern New England for a long time subsequent to the first settlement of this part of the country (see Bull. Nutt. Orn. Club, i, Sept., 1876, p. 55), but long since ceased to exist here in a wild state.” (Bull. Essex Inst., x, 1878, p. 31.) LAGOPUS ALBUS: WILLOW PTARMIGAN. 145 FAMILY TETRAONIDA:: GROUSE. WILLOW PTARMIGAN. Lacopus ALBus (Gm.) Aud. Chars. Legs feathered to the claws. In winter, pure white, tail black, two middle feathers excepted; bill black. Summer, the foreparts rich chestnut or orange-brown, variegated with black- ish, the upper parts and sides barred with blackish, tawny and white; most other parts white. Length, 15.00; extent, 24.00; wing, 7.75 ; tail, 5.10. The New England record of the Ptarmigan is not free from suspicion, and we allow the species a place with some misgiving. It doubtless occurs, however, in Northern Maine, as it certainly does in Lewis County, N.Y. Prof. Verrill says: ‘‘ Northern Maine, in winter, rare” (Pr. Essex Inst., iii, 1862, p. 157). The Massa- chusetts (Manchester, Essex Co., May, 1859) specimen, recorded by Dr. Coues (ibid., v, 1868, p. 289) as extant in the Museum of the Essex Institute, was supposed to have been brought alive from Labrador and escaped, as stated in that connection. Mr. G. A. Boardman, of Calais, Me., to whom we wrote for information, assures us that he has been unable to satisfy himself that the Ptarmigan has ever been known to occur in New Eng- land. With this explanation, which we trust will not leave us liable to the charge of improperly augmenting our list of New England birds, and calling special atten- tion to the insufficiency of the accredited records, we introduce the species hypothetically. 146 TETRAONID# : GROUSE, PRAIRIE HEN. Cupiponia cupipo (L.) Ba. Char. Larger than the Ruffed Grouse. Tail very short. Legs feathered to the toes. A tuft of long pointed feathers on each side of the neck, beneath which is a naked space capable of great inflation. Plumage of the under parts barred transversely. Writing in 1868, Dr. Coues speaks of the Prairie Fowl in the following terms: ‘“ This species is still known to reside in certain localities in New England, though much less numerous than formerly, and doubtless destined shortly to become extinct.” He cites Martha’s Vineyard and Naushon, as well as Long Island, upon the testimony of previous writers (Pr. Essex Inst., v, 1868, p. 287). Mr. Allen had before stated it to be “nearly extinct in Massachusetts.” A few, he said, still occasionally visit the southeastern part of the State from Long Island, where the bird still lived at that date (Pr. Essex Inst., iv, 1864, p. 85). In 1839, ac- cording to the Rev. W. B. O. Peabody, the only place where it was still found was Martha’s Vineyard and one small island near it, though once very common in Massa- chusetts (Rep. B. Mass., 1839, p. 355). Mr. Merriam’s advices are as follows :— “ The Prairie Chicken, or Pinnated Grouse, Cupidonia cupido (Linné) B., was formerly a resident of New Eng- land, but, like the Wild Turkey, was exterminated many years ago —at least so far as the mainland is concerned, for it is said that a few still exist on some of the islands south of Cape Cod (Naushon, for example, and perhaps Martha’s Vineyard). However, it is pretty certain that many years have elapsed since the last ‘wild chicken’ CUPIDONIA CUPIDO: PRAIRIE HEN. 147 was seen in Connecticut, for even Linsley, in 1842, gave it asa bird of the past. Nuttall, ten years earlier (in 1832), said that they were still met with ‘on the brushy FIGs, 30, 31.—HrEap AND Foot oF Prairig£ HEN, Natural size. plains of Long Island, and in similar shrubby barrens in Westford, Connecticut’” (Rev. B. Conn, 1877, p. 101). In Mr. Allen’s List of 1878 (Bull. Essex Inst., x, p. 22) the statement is made of the former commonness of the 148 TETRAONIDZ : GROUSE. bird in Massachusetts, and of its extirpation long since from all portions except Martha’s Vineyard, where a few “are said’”’ still to exist. At p. 37 of the same admirable catalogue, under head of “Introduced undomesticated species,” the writer speaks of their introduction at dif- ferent times in Barnstable County, adding that “ none of them or their descendants are certainly known to still exist there.” Viewing the “ perhaps” and “‘it is said” of the later records, it is gratifying to be able to pronounce without reserve of the preservation of this fine game bird in our country up to the present time. According to Mr. Purdie, quite a little colony still lives on Martha’s Vine- yard, Mass., the last New England stronghold of the species. (See Maynard’s Birds of Eastern North Amer- ica, part xiv, July, 1880, p. 351.) It would seem perfectly feasible to stock suitable localities with Prairie Hens, which, if protected by stringent law for a period of years, might then resume the rdle of the fine game bird which the species formerly took in New England. CANADA GROUSE, OR SPRUCE PARTRIDGE. CANACE CANADENSIS (L.) Reich. Chars. Male: Tail of sixteen feathers, rounded, black, with a broad orange-brown terminal bar. No obviously peculiar feath- ers on the side of the neck. Legs feathered to between the toes. The usual naked, colored strip of skin over the eye. Prevailing color black, with numerous sharp white bars and spots on the under parts, and on the upper parts finely waved with gray or tawny. Length, about 16.00; wing, 7.00; tail, CANACE CANADENSIS : CANADA GROUSE. 149 5.50. Female: nowhere continuously black, but much varie- gated with brown, tawny and white ; the same orange colored tail-bar, not so well defined. In size, rather less than the male. The normal limit of dispersion of the Canada Grouse southward divides the Canadian from the Alleghanian Fauna, enabling us to draw the line between the two with greater exactitude, perhaps, than that afforded by the distribution of any other of our birds. The fine creature resides in all the evergreen wood- ed, and especially in the swampy, parts of North- ern New England, and is not a migra- tory species. It is said to be common at Umbagog, in =e 2 7 Maine, and to be ee ordinarily limited southward by the White Mountain range. The few in- stances in which this Grouse has been shown to occur beyond the region indicated must be regarded as irregu- lar, if not wholly accidental. Mr. Allen, very properly, it seems to us, considers the two reported Massachusetts captures as accidental. One of these was in the hem- lock woods of Gloucester, in September, 1851; the other in Roxbury, about 1865 (Am. Nat., iii, 1870, p. 636; and Bull. Essex Inst., x, 1878, p. 22). Farther south, the Spruce Grouse is unknown, even as a straggler. Like others of its family, this Grouse nests on the ground, usually in swampy, secluded localities. The eggs are laid in the latter part of May, and young may 150 TETRAONID : GROUSE. be found by the middle of June. When surprised with her brood, the parent bird is very courageous in their defence, even attacking the intruder who threatens the peace. The nest is made of twigs, leaves, grasses, and moss, and much art is often displayed to conceal it. The eggs, to the number of a dozen or more, are less elongate than those of some Grouse, broader at the butt, and more pointed at the other end; thus approaching the shape characteristic of Partridge eggs, and being like those of Ptarmigan in size and form. The follow- ing measurements of selected examples from a large series show the size, shape and range of variation: 1.70 by 1.25; 1.70 by 1.20; 1.65 by 1.25; 1.65 by 1.15. High in the oviduct the egg is creamy-white. This color is washed over to a varying degree of intensity with rich chestnut-brown — generally a pale “creamy”’ brown —and is further dotted, spotted, sometimes even splashed and blotched, with a very dark, heavy shade of the same color, the markings being numerous, strong and bold, of no determinate shape, and very irregularly dis- tributed. These markings are only an intensification, in spots, of the ground color, but are very heavy, and show a decided approach to the peculiarly dark and heavy pattern of Ptarmigan eggs. RUFFED GROUSE, OR PARTRIDGE. BoNnaSA UMBELLA (L.) Steph. Chars. Tarsi incompletely feathered. Head crested. Tail large and fan-shaped, usually of 18 broad obtuse feathers. A con- spicuous ruffle of lengthened feathers on each side of the neck. Tail gray or brown, with broad subterminal black zone, and BONASA UMBELLA: RUFFED GROUSE. I51 finely barred or vermiculated with black. Feathers of the ruff glossy dark brown or black. Primaries fuscous, marked with whitish on the outer webs. Under parts whitish or pale tawny, variously marked with brown, chiefly in bars, the throat chiefly immaculate ; upper parts intimately blended olive, brown, gray black and white, the general effect being black and white or tawny spots on a reddish-brown ground. Varies interminably in the precise tone and pattern of the markings. Female resembling the male: the ruff less developed and not so intensely colored. Length, 16.00-18.00; extent, about 22.00; wing and tail, each 6.00-7.00; tarsus, about 1.75; middle toe and claw, about 2.00. This fine bird is the most abundant and generously distributed kind of Grouse in New England, inhabiting wooded and swampy portions of our country, without regard to special geographical distribution. In fact, Grouse of this species, in one or another of its several varieties, occur in nearly all the woodland of North America, and are very closely related to the Hazel Grouse of Europe, Bovasa betulina. The characters of any Bonasa, or “ruffled” Grouse, are so strongly marked that there should be no difficulty in recognizing it, and no confusion with species of Cazace, still less with any of the Partridges proper. Whatever the special tone and pattern of coloration of these birds, the soft, silky black frill on the neck, and the amply fan-shaped tail. should be distinctive at a glance. Yet great uncertainty does find its way into the minds of many who have ample means of judging, as to the character of this bird. Much of this is traceable to the vague use of the name “ Partridge” to designate birds not only specifically but also generally distinct from one another. Both the Canace canadensis and Bonasa umbella are true Grouse, as witnesscd by the feathering of the shank and nos- trils; but in New England they are both often called 152 TETRAONIDE : GROUSE. “ Partridges,” the real Partridge of the United States being termed a Quail. In the Southern States the case is still further complicated by calling Bonasa a “ Pheas- ant.” This confusion in nomenclature is an inheritance from the earliest English settlers of our country, who naturally called any bird newtothem by a name suggested by its real or fancied resemblance to some European species with which they were familiar. Most of the error resulting from such practice ceases in the course Fic. 33.— Heap oF Rurrep Grousz. Natural size. of time to be mischievous, or even disappears, as in the case of our Robin, 7urdus migratorius, which familiar bird no one confounds with the European “ Robin Red- breast,” the very existence of which is little more than a memory of nursery tales with most persons in this country. The matter stands very differently, however, with our game birds of the gallinaceous tribe, the con- fusion of nomenclature being so hopeless that natural- ists, after repeatedly returning to the charge, generally give up in dispair of doing away with it. The most remarkable trait in the disposition of the Ruffed Grouse is that which confirms the bird in the BONASA UMBELLA: RUFFED GROUSE. 153 habit of making the noise called “drumming.” Here again not only sportsmen but the best naturalists are singularly discordant in the explanation they give of the curious feat. Mounted upon a fallen log or stump, the Grouse puffs out its feathers, spreads its tail, raises its crest, and opens its “umbrellas ;” and then, with its head drawn close to the body, struts stiffly and consequen- tially about. So far, the performance tallies with what every one has seen when a Turkey-cock displays what a superb masculine creature it takes itself to be, and probably all of our Grouse exploit in a similar manner, though each one after a fashion of its own, when inflated with erotic vanity. Just as the Turkey-cock “ gobbles” at such times, so do other Gadling give vent to the most uncouth sounds, the volume of which is so vastly in- creased, in the cases of many of the Grouse, by the great air-sacs which are developed beneath the skin of the neck, that the hollow reveberations may be heard at a great distance. The noise which proceeds from the Ruffed Grouse, however, is not vocal but instrumental, and that it results from amazingly rapid vibration of the wings is certain. For one who is near enough during the performance may see that the wings move so rap- idly that the strokes dissolve to the eye in a haze on each side of the creature, like that perceived when a Humming-bird is hovering before a flower. But just how the noise is made is a question which has been confi- dently answered in at least four different and irrecon- cilable ways. First, say some, the bird beats its wings against the log or stump upon which it stands. Sec- ondly, it strikes the outside of the wings together over its back. Thirdly, it claps its wings against the sides of its body, like a rooster about to crow. Fourthly, it 154 TETRAONID : GROUSE. beats the air. Those who are interested to follow up the subject may refer to Dr. Coues’ Birds of the North- west, where the views of many writers are collated and compared, the author coming to the conclusion that the last explanation here given is the correct one. No one who has heard the whirring of the tiny Humming-bird, or the “booming ” of the night-hawk, and witnessed the extraordinary aérial antics of the latter bird at the moment the sound is produced, can doubt that the rapid movement of feathers in the air may make so much noise that there is no difficulty in explaining the rum- bling sounds that come from the Ruffed Grouse in the same way, contrary as it is to the familiar clapping of the wings of the barn-yard fowl. The bird’s “ music ” would, therefore, appear to be literally that of a wind instrument — unlike the vocalization of most Grouse, and also different from the playing upon a stringed in- strument which results in the stridulation of many in- sects, which literally fiddle upon themselves by scraping together different parts of the body. As to the reason why the Grouse indulges in such performances, it may be said that it is primarily a manifestation of sexual vigor and desire, universally admired by the fair of the opposite sex, like all other masculine demonstrations, fram the most delicately suggestive to the most effec- tually operative. But the Grouse drums both in and out of love; so that it seems to be done often for his own amusement, or to work off his animal spirits. The excessive muscular motility induced when the bird has his spasms may be imagined when we reflect that the great stiff wings move up and down too rapidly to be perceived by the human eye, and that millions of cubic yards of air are set in vibration audible to our dull ears. BONASA UMBELLA: RUFFED GROUSE. 155 In the greater part of May, and early in June, you may find the nest in the woods, oftenest in low swampy places or tangled undergrowth, at the foot of a bush or stump, or alongside of a prostrate log. It is a rude domicile, — merely a slight hollow in the ground, lined with some leaves or a little grass or moss. The eggs are characteristic of the species, differing both in form and color from those of most Grouse; they approach the pyriform contour — very broad and blunt at one end, and sharp at the other—usually seen in Partridge eggs, and also lack the heaviness of coloring common to most Grouse’s eggs, and at a maximum in those of Ptar- migan. The eggs are creamy-colored, varying from pale, creamy white to rich creamy-brown; they may be im- maculate, or scarcely dotted in fine points only, though they sometimes have small round spots of pale chocolate- brown set inamongst countless minute dots. In number they range from 8 or 10 toa dozen or more, according to the age and vigor of the parents or other circumstances ; and in size they measure about one-and two-thirds by one and a fourth inches. They are said to be deposited *at intervals of twenty-four hours till the set is completed, and to hatch in about eighteen days from the beginning of incubation. The young begin to ramble about as soon as they are hatched, like little chickens, and in fact like all the “ precocial” Galline and Grallatores ; the mother leads them in paths of peace and pleasantness, as well as she can judge, where food is most abundant, and shelter from enemies is most likely to be secured — the thickest cover of tangle, where the ground is springy, being the favorite resort. She is motherly in the extremé; her maternal devotion is not seldom proven by the vigilance and address she displays to get 156 TETRAONID : GROUSE. her little ones hidden from threatened danger before she thinks of her own safety, and her courage in such an emergency will even lead her to risk her own life in their defence. In our country, as well as generally in northern portions of the range of this Grouse, one brood seems to be all that the birds can successfully produce and rear as arule; for the chicks grow tardily, and are not off their parents’ hands till well toward the waning summer; so that the broods of callow young found un- usually late in the season are probably to be accounted for by some accident to the happy course of domestic affairs early in the season. The flesh of this bird is white, and good for the table. The Grouse ranks high as a game bird in the estimation of some sportsmen, but its pursuit is attended witH great uncertainty and difficulty, except in localities where the birds are very abundant. It is very fatiguing to follow them in their fastnesses of swamp and tangle; they behave before a dog with more regard to their own ideas than to the wishes of their would-be destroyers ; they get up with startling suddenness, and fly off with amaz- ing celerity; altogether their instinct of self-preserva- tion is “functionally developed” to a high rate of efficiency, as a physiologist might say, and they would be still more numerous did not these very qualities stimulate the ardor of the sportsman to their ceaseless persecution. Being robust, hardy birds, much more so than Partridges, they stand our hard winters well, prob- ably very seldom freezing to death or getting snowed up to their destruction, accidents to which the smaller and more delicate Partridges are frequently exposed in our latitudes. Having an extensive and varied bill of fare, in numerous small fruits, both hard and soft, in season, ORTYX VIRGINIANA: THE QUAIL, OR BOB WHITE. 157 in numberless insects during a part of the year, and in various leaves and buds at another, life may be quite worth living for these brave, self-reliant and judicious creatures. Let us imagine them to be resigned to the inevitable having to live, even though they be neither contented nor happy; and as finding in that necessity the logical refuge from the doubt raised by many half- fledged philosophers whether life be worth living. THE AMERICAN PARTRIDGE, QUAIL, OR BOB-WHITE. OrTYx VIRGINIANA (L.) Bp. Chars. Tarsi and nasal fossa naked. A small erectable crest on the head. No peculiar feathers on side of neck. Throat of male white, of female tawny. Upper parts blended brownish- red and gray ; lower parts whitish, with many sharp dark marks, especially on the breast and about the white on the throat. Length about 9.00; extent, 14.50; wing, 4.50: tail, 2.75. The well-known and abundant Bob-white, called “Quail,” in New England, where the Ruffed Grouse is called “ Par- tridge,” and named “ Partridge ” further south, wherever the Ruffed Grouse is called “‘ Pheasant,’ — this paragon of good qualities, from the sportsman’s standpoint, has been ascribed in general terms to all New England, as by Dr. Brewer for example, but certainly upon hasty conclusions. Though, owing to its habit of colonizing particular spots beyond its general range, and to some extent to its habit of moving back and forth from caprice or according to vicissitudes of the weather, it is diffi- cult to trace the exact limit of its northward dispersion, 158 TETRAONID : GROUSE, the bird may be said to inhabit at present only the three southern New England States. That it overlaps at times, or in particular localities, into the other three, is doubtless a fact. It is a true component of the Alle- ghanian and other more southern Faune, its range being complementary to that of the Spruce Grouse, Canace canadensis : and the scattering coveys in south- ern Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont are rather evidence of this fact than of the assumption that the bird should be considered native to New England at large. The range appears, moreover, to have been arti- Fic. 34.— Biri anp Foor or Qual. ficially restricted of late years as a consequence of the persecution to which the birds are always subjected. In fine, Massachusetts is practically the limit of the Bob- white, and it is not found to be numerously or evenly distributed throughout that State. A contributor to Minot’s “Birds of New England” has prepared the following agreeable sketch: “The Quail are abundant in the three Southern States of New England, except in the colder and more hilly portions. They are not found much to the east or north of Bos- ton, in the neighborhood of which, however, they are resident throughout the year. Our observations on ORTYX VIRGINIANA: THE QUAIL, OR BOB-WHITE. 159 them naturally begin at that season of the year when they relinquish the habits of extreme cunning and vigi- lance for that of confidence in man’s respect tor domes- tic life, that is in the early part of summer. Though among the har- diest and most active of feath- ered creatures, they are prudent in spring, and do not commit them- selves to the risks of incuba- tion until they have received full assurance of fit- ting weather. In this respect they differ from the peculiar but more venturesome Woodcock, whose premature endea- vors, founded up- on the first de- ceptive smile of spring, to raise a family, are often defeated by an unexpected snow-storm. The Quail do not begin until May, when they announce the fact to all their neighbors within half a mile by their loud, frank and cheery whistle, which is generally trans- Fic. 35.—Cock AND HEN QuaiL. Natural size. 160 TETRAONIDE : GROUSE. lated into our uncouth language as ‘ Bob-white.’ The male is not now constrained by fear, and instead of any false pride, he has a proper sense of his own comely appearance. He knows that he is attending adequately to his own department in the great business of nature, and is entirely willing that any one sHould see him. He has no fear of man, but keeps an eye to the hawks, cats, and those other predatory enemies, who respect neither time, place nor season. He is willing to take any amount of family responsibility ; nature cannot ask too much of him; he will whistle to two or three wives if necessary ; and he will even accept the law of Moses, and assume the part of husband toward his brother’s widow. Should his wife propose a family of fifteen in- stead of nine, he does not complain; and moreover, having escorted his young family about for some time, he is ready to go through with this once or even twice more. In fact, he carries his amiability and industry so far as often to introduce a half-grown family to the rigors of winter, so that it is not uncommon to find a covey of these little ‘cheepers,’ when hardly able to fly, even in November. A successful pair of Quail will often turn out twenty-five young in a season. During the period of incubation, the Quail often appear on our lawns, or ‘on the walls and fences by the roadside. Though their bills are especially adapted to crushing, and their crops to dissolving small grains and seeds, they are also fond of grubs, worms and other insects, and are thus useful in destroying the farmer’s pests.” The eggs of the American Partridges differ much among themselves, those of some species, as the beauti- ful crested creatures of the southwest, being as heavily colored as those of Grouse, while others are pure white, ORTYX VIRGINIANA: THE QUAIL, OR BOB-WHITE. 161 without any markings. Bob-white’s are of the latter character. They are broad and blunt at one end and sharp at the other, and measure about 1.25 by 1.00. The nest is a mere depression in the ground, lined with a little grass or a few leaves, and usually hidden beneath the friendly shelter of overgrowing grass weeds or bushes — not seldom a heap of brushwood. The num- ber of eggs laid is wholly indeterminate. A female may be found incubating eight or ten only; while in other cases, in which very likely more than one parent con- tributes some of the number, as many as two dozen have been found together. Among the perennial conundrums propounded by persons short-sighted in respect to the laws of nature is one which touches the present bird. Quite a literature sprang up recently in the sporting papers in answer to the question, “Can Quail withhold their scent?” No one doubts that under some circumstances the best dog is unable to find a Quail by following his nose, or to detect its presence by the sense of smell. Some sup- pose this due to causes outside the bird, and wholly in- dependent of the bird’s intentions or actions, such as the state of the atmosphere. Others maintain that the bird can consciously, that is, intentionally and design- edly, prevent the escape of its effluvium, and thus secure immunity from pursuit. The former explanation seems to be quite beside the point, and the latter to be absurd. No act of conscious volition —that is, the operation of will-power, could effect such a result, even supposing a Quail to know when it would be of advantage to retain its effluvium, and to try to do so— which supposition is itself unreasonable. The true explanation would seem to be that certain actions of the bird, instinctively ac- 162 TETRAONID : GROUSE, complished in the face of danger, result in the reten- tion of the scent; the retention being, furthermore, favored or hindered by certain circumstances, such as the state of the atmosphere. NoTE ON THE INTRODUCTION OF THE MESSINA OR MIGRATORY QUAIL OF EuROPE, Coturnix dactylisonans, in New England. Of late years, hundreds of these birds, quite different generically as well as specifically from any American representatives of the Partridge family, have been imported and turned out in various parts of New England. Though they are known in some instances to have paired and bred, the result of the experiment is still doubtful, and their naturalization in New England does not appear to be an accomplished fact. Lack of space forbids us to enter into the details of the experiment. Mr. Allen has given a summary notice (Bull. Essex Inst., x, 1878, p. 36); and the fol- lowing records may also be consulted: Forest and Stream, issues of June 28, Aug. 2, 9, 23, Sept. 6, Nov. 15, 22, 29, Dec. 6, 27, 1877; June 20, Aug. 8, 22, 1878; Jan. 1, Feb. 20, Mar. 13, 20, June 19, 26, Aug. 14, 28, Oct. 16, Dec. 11, 25, 1870. WATER BIRDS. FAMILY CHARADRIIDA: PLOVERS. BLACK-BELLIED PLOVER. SQUATAROLA HELVETICA (Z.) Cuv. Chars. Distinguished from all other Plovers by having a small hind toe, no trace of which is seen in the rest of the species. Plumage speckled, like that of the Golden Plover, without any of the rings and bands of color which characterize the species of 4 gialites. Adult breeding plumage (rarely seen in the U. S.): Face and entire under parts, black; upper parts, variegated with black and white or ashy ; tail, barred with black and white ; wing quills, dusky, with large white patches. Adult winter plumage, and young: Under parts, white, more or less shaded with gray; the throat and breast speckled with dusky; upper parts speckled with blackish, white and yellowish ; rump, white, with dark bars; legs, dull bluish. Old birds changing show every gradation between the plumages given. Length, I1.00- 12.00; extent about 23.50; wing, 7.25; tail, 3.00; bill, 1.00- 1.25 ; tarsus, 2.00; middle toe, 1.20. Passing from the Land Birds, we enter now upon the no less varied and scarcely less extensive series of those feathered creatures which are seldom found except by the water’s edge, or which are as much at home in the limpid element as upon its fixed shores; which, when not on the water itself, do not as a rule live in trees and 163 164 CHARADRIIDZ : PLOVERS, bushes above the ground, but alight upon the earth it- self. This series is collectively called “‘ Water Birds ;” the members of which, representing many families and even orders, fall in the two extensive categories of wad- ing or grallatorial birds, and of swimming or xatatorial birds, according as their organization fits them more es- pecially for one or the other of these modes of life. The former are usually small-bodied, long-legged, and long- necked birds; the Snipes and Plovers, and the Herons and Cranes, respectively exemplify some of the leading Fic. 36. — Heap AND Foot oF SQUATAROLA. Natural size, families ; while the thick-set, short-limbed, web-footed birds of all kinds illustrate the great variety of ways in which the natatorial plan of structure is carried out. In round numbers about two-fifths of the Bird Fauna of New England consists of water birds. The Plovers, as a group, like the members of the closely related Snipe family, are noted for the extent and regularity of their migrations. Many species pro- tract their mysterious journey to very high latitudes in the spring time; in the fall, when the bird-tide ebbs, they visit us again for a few weeks, and pass on south- SQUATAROLA HELVETICA: BLACK-BELLIED PLOVER. 165 ward. The majority of such birds are, therefore, vernal and autumnal migrants with us, neither nesting within our limits, nor enduring the rigors of our inhospitable season. The Black-bellied Plover, called ‘Bull-head” or “ Beetle-head”” by the gunners, is a good illustration of these remarks. It is common during the migration, particularly coastwise, but never seen at other seasons, It arrives late in April, and remains but a short time, seeming anxious to be on its way, as if it knew what a long journey must be accomplished in order that the sudden and fleeting Arctic summer may see its brood safely on wing. Returning in the fall from these dreary hyperborean regions, it greets us early in September, and then seems in no hurry to seek other feeding grounds. For several weeks it lingers with us in flocks, both along the coast and on the uplands, before pro- ceeding further on its long and devious pathway towards the tropics. Eggs of. this species, collected on the Arctic coast, east of Anderson River, July 4, 1864, afford the follow- ing description: Size 2.10 by 1.40, to I.90 by 1.40, ina set of four. Color, brownish-drab, or rather dark brownish-clay color, very thickly marked at and around the larger end, for nearly half the length of the egg, with irregularly sized and shaped spots and blotches of brownish-black, and over the rest of the surface thinly spotted with smaller marks of the same color. The larger markings around the butt are to a great extent confluent, producing an imperfect wreath.