76 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA., West of North Iceland: 65° 00'N.L., 28° 10'W. L., young-fish trawl, 1000 m. wire out, depth of the sea 1240 m.; 2 spec. South of Iceland: 61° 34'N.L., 19°05’ W.L., young-fish trawl, 1800 m. wire out, depth of the sea 2160 m.; 4 spec. South of Iceland: 61°30’N. L., 17°08'W.L,., young-fish trawl, 1800 m. wire out, depth of the sea ? m.; 8 small spec. South of Iceland: 62°47'N.L., 15°03’ W.L., young-fish trawl, 1500 m. wire out, depth of the sea 1950 m.; I spec. Distribution. On the European side of the Atlantic, this species has been taken in the Bay of Gascony, 425 fm. (Caullery), off Portugal, 1378 fm. (A. Milne-Edwards), south-west of the Azores, 1675 fm., and at the Canary Isles, 1675 fm. (Sp. Bate), also south of the Cape Verde Isles at 2128 fm. and in the vertical net from o to 213 fm. (Ortmann). In the Mediterranean it has been taken at Mes- sina (Riggio) and near Monaco, at the last place in a large net sunk to a little over 1000 fm. (Lo Bianco). It has also been taken northwest of the Bermudas, 2675 fm. (Sp. Bate) and at a number of places off the east coast of America between 31°41'N.L. and 42°2'N.L,, the depths varying from 105 to 2949 fm. (S. I. Smith). But Smith writes further (Rep. Comm. Fish... for 1885, p. 63), that a single specimen was taken “at the surface in a dip-net, and was kept alive for half an hour”. This and another reason given induced Smith to write: “These facts lead me to suppose that this species is not a habitual inhabitant of the bottom at great depths, but more probably a truly free-swimming inhabitant of some part of the vast region intermediate between the surface and the bottom, such a one as might occasionally stray to the surface or to considerable depths”. The observations mentioned by Ortmann and Lo Bianco of specimens taken in the vertical net agree with this. To judge from the structure of the animal and from the 4 catches made by the “Thor” in 1904, Smith’s supposition seems quite justified. Whether the specimens referred by Faxon (Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. XVIII, p. 161) with a query to A. Agassizit really belong to this species, I am unable to determine; they came from the Pacific in the Gulf of Panama and somewhat further south. Remarks. It is perhaps right to add that the specimens investigated by me certainly belong to the A. Agassizii so well described and figured by Smith; in referring it as synonym to A. purpurea I have only followed the authors. — At the time of capture of the specimens taken by the “Ingolf” at St. 11 and St. 12 it was noted: “animals clear, blood-red all over, eyes black”. 72. Acanthephyra gracilis S. I. Smith. ! 1882. Miersia gracilis S.I. Smith, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Vol. X, p. 70, Pl. XI, figs. 4—4d; Pl. XII, fig. ro. 1886. — — §.L Smith, Rep. Comm. Fish and Fisher. for 1885, p. 672. Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has not taken this species but it was brought home in 1904 by the “Thor” from the following locality. South of Iceland: 62° 47'N.L,., 15°03’ W. L., 1950 m., young-fish trawl, 1500 m. wire out; 1 spec. Distribution. The species was founded on a specimen taken off the east coast of America CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 77 at 34° 28’ 25" N.L., 75° 22'50” W.L., 1632 fm.; later, a specimen was taken somewhat more to the north, namely, 36°05'5'N.L., of the same coast at 2512 fm. In 1905 a number of specimens were captured by the “Thor” in the young-fish trawl at two stations respectively west of the Channel and west of Brittany. The species is a bottom form certainly just as little as A. purpurea. The length of the wire out was in five catches respectively 1800, 900, 300, 300 and 200 m.; with 200 m. out only quite small specimens were taken, while the two largest specimens were taken with 1800 and goo m. and with g00 m. both large and rather small specimens were taken. Remarks. In his above mentioned paper Stanley Kemp refers 4. gracilis Smith as a synonym to A. debilis A. M-~Edw. Not having seen the French author’s figure I have no opinion on the question. My specimens agree well with the description and figure given by Smith, but not so well with Kemp’s description and figures of A. dedilis. The lateral plates of the fifth abdominal segment have their posterior margin less convex than in Kemp’s fig. 4 and possess nearly always the marginal tooth pointed out by Smith. Further, the telson has several dorsal pairs of spines in front of the large pair, and the terminal part beyond the last pair of spines is considerably longer than shown by Kemp. Finally, I cannot see any vestige of the luminous organs described by Kemp. For these reasons I must leave the question of synonymy to future investigators. 73. Acanthephyra Batei Faxon. Pl. IV, fig. 2a (named A, brevirostris). 1888. Acanthephyra brevirostris Sp. Bate, Rep. Challenger, Vol. XXIV, p. 751, Pl. CXXVI, figs. 5—6. 1897. _ batei, Faxon, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool., Vol. XVIII, p. 167. Occurrence, The “Ingolf’ has not found this species but it was brought home in 1904 by the “Thor” from the following locality. South of Iceland: 61° 30'N.L,, 17°08’ W.L., young-fish trawl, 1800 m. wire out; I spec. Distribution. The species was founded on two specimens taken in the Atlantic at 1° 22'N.L,, 26° 36' W. L., 1500 fm. No other specimens are mentioned in the literature. The species is certainly not a bottom form; the specimen examined by me can scarcely have been in greater depths than ca. 400 fm., so that it was living pelagically in the intermediate layers. Remarks. The “Thor” specimen is 60 mm. long. The carapace is greenish, lighter or darker chiefly according to the colour of the tissues underneath. The dorsal aspect of the first three ab- dominal segments is gray-green, the lateral surfaces much lighter. The carapace is furnished with a high, sharp keel along the whole length of the median line; the front part of this keel and the rostrum together with 10 dorsal spines, the rostrum which is somewhat bent upwards with 1 spine, at the middle of the lower margin; the rostrum is more strongly bent upwards that Bate’s fig. 5 shows. The lateral keel of the carapace begins a little behind the orbital margin, continues right to the posterior margin and is very obvious. The first and second abdominal segments have no dorsal keel, the four following have a sharp dorsal ridge along their whole length and on the 4* to the 6" the ridge runs out into a fairly small spine. The telson has 3 small spines on the sharp distal section of each of the two ridges; the truncated end has 5 spines, of which the lateral pair are long, the three others = . a ee ha aa == _ : Ps ee a 3 ye a THE DANISH [ee OLEF-EVPEDITION. VOL. iI,, PART 2. CONTENTS: ° H. J. HANSEN: CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. (L.) PUBLISHED AT THE COST OF THE GOVERNMENT BY THE DIRECTION OF THE ZOOLOGICAL MUSEUM OF THE UNIVERSITY. NAY HE DY-2-- $$ Roo UNIVERSITY COPENHAGEN. H. HAGERUP. PRINTED BY BIANCO LUNO. 1908. Battcect THE DANISH INGOLF-EXPEDITION. VOLUME IIL. he CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. | BY H. J. HANSEN. WITH 5 PLATES AND 4 FIGURES IN THE TEXT, 1 CHART, AND A LIST OF THE STATIONS. TRANSLATED BY DR. H. M. KYLE. .% COPENHAGEN. PRINTED BY BIANCO LUNO. 1908. CONTENTS. Crustacea Malacostraca. Page Page RERUEOMCOOTY, \IRMINP Ree Sob, ees Ts 35. Nephropsis atlantica Norm.................... 43- Eerie Order Wetsgoga tn. fice tie ie eS Pe 6. aoe. Nepnzops norvegicus ‘L. .) 22) 6 6c 43- YR ns SIE ARCS a dR i aL Io. muon wicoimides’ f.)veri. 8 ae 44. 1. Stenorhynchus longirostris Fabr. ............. 10. 37. — Bromoaus: Nepales Or cs poeta 45. 2. Lispognathus Thompsoni Norm............... Il. Bor eranwon Auman Kite eos... . cdeee ees. 46. 3. Scyramathia Carpenteri Norm............ ..., 12. 39. Cheraphilus neglectus G. O. Sars.............. 47. 4. Chionoecetes Opilio O. Fabr................... 12. 40. Sclerocrangon boreas Phipps................. 47. MraEMVORPOTaNeUN Ess ly ws eles oll eee cod 13. 41. _ RENO GU OES RIB cei a's: sn ei aeeaiale 49. Gr— - .cGoarctatne Leach eee kk 15. aa, Nectoctangon lar’ Owen! 200. eee cue. 49. Pa Rorunns hosatis Mabros i ess 8 eS 16. 43. Sabinea hystrix A. M.-Edw.................... 51. Pancarcinus: Mesnas Tere ir ces ey I. at 17. 44. = Snkaise etal cers Se 51. g. Geryon affinis A. M.-Edw. & Bouv. ........... 18. 45. _ septemcarinata Sab................... 52. Io. fae ths 1 or AE he a Un A 19. 46. Pontophilus norvegicus M.Sars.............. 53- 11. Cymonomus Normani Lankester.............. 20. 47. — epinosus, Leah 86. AS Bak 55- Bish MNT vi aio PG yk CUR TAS s Co hs wid vag a neues 21. 48. Glyphocrangon sculptus Smith ............... 55- 12. Neolithodes Grimaldii A. M.-Edw. & Bouv. .... 21. 49. Hippolyte varians Leach ..................... 55- TS) A PACROURS MAIS ip ocdi7 34 Wot ope i eae ee 22. 50. Spirontocaris Fabricii Kr. .................... 56. 14. Paralomis spectabilis n. sp... .. RDA She ein oe aR 22. 51. — Gaimardii H. M.-Edw............ 56. 15. — Botiviert, S08 phere es 24. 52. = PPINS SOW ta pa bie ek. jes ewes ps 58. 16. Eupagurus Bernhardus L..................... 25. 53. _— Lilljeborgii Danielssen........... 59- 17. —_ pithesceis Kae) et ees 27. 54. _ SMBOROH Ud Mle. ws Sec ees eens 60. 18. — tricarinatus Nott 0 Gesoens 28. 55. -- PUSRIA Toe es ees ee teks 61. 19. Anapagurus levis Thomps.................... 29. 56. _ PUG nie oo ites et Vedi 62. 20. Parapagurus pilosimanus Smith .............. 29. 57. —_ POMP MAN. Clete co Hele wis 63. 21. Galathea intermedia Lilljb..................... 30. 58. — groenlandica J.C. Fabr. ......... 64. en. — PURE LUMENS Gti iiats cco ials cae sled a 31. 59. — MICTOCETOS KTS ioc. eek eke 65. aa Mania Damitnca Penn. oo. oes ca eo ce 32. 60. Bythocaris leucopis G. O. Sars................. 66. 24. - Penmimeta CeO Sate) oes SN cw ane 34. 61. — PAV EEI- PACU 2s iS sina Ses a cas mete © 67. 25. — microphthalma A. M.-Edw............ 35. 62. _ grencilie Gol. Sinith sso. hve secs 68. 26. Galacantha rostrata A, M.-Edw................ 35- 63. — simplicirostris G.O. Sars........... 69. 27. Munidopsis curvirostra Whiteaves............. 36. 642 Caridion, Gordoni ‘Bate... i. cee eo 70. 28. — Antonii A. M.-Edw................ 38. GGoranasing borealis Kr io)... os aoe ood. ves 70. 29. _ CATT E EA CUT 1 i ee es SES os 38. 66. — Montagui Leach............... Salat pan 30. Uroptychus nitidus A. M.-Edw. var. concolor 67. _ propinquus G. O. Sars..............- 72. DEP SEMRME She Gise fig Sc SMe aces e's be we 39- 68. — Mouser: Caulk sise. cet ciie eacas 73. 31. Uroptychus rubro-vittatus A. M.-Edw.......... 40. 69. Pandalina brevirostris Rathke ................ 74. Cy Mirra tered BO aac ce ak Seabee 41. 70. Nematocarcinus exilis Bate................... 74. 32. Calocaris Macandree Bell .................... 4I. 71. Acanthephyra purpurea A. M.-Edw............ 75- 33. Polycheles sculptus Smith.................... 41. 72: -- Gracuwss. J Smith =. 26% ore 76. 34. _ OTTO RS is a cg Um 42. 73: — Stes) BASOM ios ina; cece ee en roe Page 74. Pasipnae tarda eee oo ies sa sk dete) ass tn 78. 75. Parapasiphaé sulcatifrons S$. I. Smith......... 79. 76. Hymenodora glacialis Buchh................. 79. 77. Gennadas elegans S.I. Smith................ 81. 78. Sergestes arcticus Kroyer............. ..... 82. 79. — robustus:S, JeSonte 25. es 83. Tl. - Order: Buphansincea sere isnt Se ae 84. 1. Thysanopoda acutifrons Holt & Tatt......... 84. 2. Meganyctiphanes norvegica M.Sars.......... 85. 3. Rhode anernis Krpyerin cing cased ees 86. 4. Pe ORT A SARE Corie 68 fel SU ae Py EES bs 87. 5. Thysanoéssa longicaudata Kroyer............ 88. 6. — peglecta Kraversi ee ciiis.. ge. 89. 7. Nematoscelis megalops G. O.Sars............ go. 8. Nematobrachion boopis Calm. ............. 2098 g. Stylocheiron maximum n.sp................ 92. 10. — longicorne G. O. Sars ........... 92. Til. Order: Miyswibseane swearede ne ksae ot iavieie cites + 93: A. Suborder Lophogastrida.... 22.0.0. 00.0.0. ecco. 93- 1. Gnathophausia Zoéa Will.-Suhm ............. 93: 2. Eucopia unguiculata Will-Suhm............. 95: 3 — sculpticauda Faxon................. 95: B.. Sub@rdes Miypide 2 Osa imei y oie ce ae 96. 4. Hansemysis Fylle H.J.H.................... 96. 5. Boreomysis scyphops G. O. Sars.............. 99. ( = distinguenda n.sp.).............. roo. 6. — Pidetia GO. Sarg 6 ies sis: 100. ve —_ HORiNia Ga Oats eRe. IOI. 8. — BYCUOA MEMOVER. Rp aicidlicsisese eps: 102. Page g. Boreomysis microps G. O. Sars............... 103. 10. Longithorax fuscus n.sp.............600eae ee 103. 11. Erythrops serrata G. O. Sars................. 105. 12. — abyssorum G. O. Sars...... ....... 105. 13. == erythrophthalma Goés............. 106. 14. _ glacialis G. O. Sars................ 106. 15. Meterythrops robusta S.I.Smith.. .......... 106. 16, _— picta Holt-& Tatt. 552 eae 107. 17. Parerythrops obesa G. O. Sars................ 107. 18. _ spectabilis G. O. Sars............ 108, 19. Amblyops abbreviata M. Sars................ 108. 20. -- n.sp. = Crozetii Ohlin not Sars... 108. 21. Paramblyops rostrata Holt & Tatt. .......... 108. 22. Pseudomma roseum G. O. Sars............... 109. 23. — frigidui a. SPs eee 109. 24. ~ APNG Men Ooets suis ee. 110. 25. _ truncatum S.I.Smith........... pi 26. _ AMCCRONEN inl dec kcls 5252548. IIL. 27. — parvum Vanh6ffen.............. BI, 28. Mysidopsis didelphys Norm.................. 112. 29. Pseudomysis abyssi G. O. Sars................ 112. 30. Mysideis insignis G. O. Sars,................. 113. 31. Stilomysis grandis G. O. Sars................. 113. 32. Mysis (Praunus) inermis Rathke............. 114. 33. — (Schistomysis) ornata G.O.Sars....... II4. 34: —) oenlate:O. Fabsieccie nha ees 114. 35.0 =) mixta: Lillebis. is ieee ae eee II5. Additions and Corrections Explanation of the Plates... 2. 3.cco Miwa eels eee ee 117. Crustacea Malacostraca. By H. J. Hansen. Introductory Remarks. t will be useful to introduce the treatment of this sub-class with a discussion of various points of | importance. The investigations of the «Ingolf» extended over the eastern part of the seas along the west coast of Greenland from a point a little north of the polar circle to about 58° N. L., two degrees south of Cape Farewell, from there in a north-easterly direction towards Iceland, the waters round this island and between Iceland and the Feeroes, lastly eastwards to a line drawn almost due north from the Feeroes to Jan Mayen. It goes without saying that all the material brought home by the «Ingolf» is included in the following pages, but I have also thought it right to include all the material which other Danish expeditions, special zoologists or others not experts (officers of the navy or officials in our northern dependency) have collected at Greenland, Iceland and the Feeroes, and which is preserved in the Copenhagen Museum; further, I have included the species given in the literature as having been taken within the region mentioned and which are not represented in our Museum, at least from those areas. The waters included are thus the Davis Straits, Baffins Bay and the narrower seas north of this to as near the pole as the «Alert» and «Discovery» reached, the seas south of Greenland to ca. 58° N.L., those along the east coast of Greenland to ca. 75° N.L., the waters west of a line from the Feeroes northwards to 68° N. L., 62/,° W.L. and from there to Jan Mayen (at ca. 71° N.L,, 8° W.L,), the waters south and south-west of Iceland to ca.60° and the sea south and south-west of the Fzroes likewise to about 60° N.L. This work contains all that is known concerning the Malacostraca in the region thus circumscribed, both what our Museum and the literature can show. Our Museum is rich in Crustacea — especially Malacostraca — from the Feeroes, Iceland and especially Greenland, and it may be permitted to mention here the principal sources (apart from the «Ingolf»). At the Feroes, Dr. phil. Th. Mortensen has made a very considerable number of dred- gings from low water out to ca. 100 fm.; a number of forms has also been received from Dr. med. F. Jorgensen. At Iceland, collections have been made especially by Dr. phil. A.C. Johansen and Mag. sc. R. Horring both of whom have also made collections at the Feroes during short sojourns there; Mag. sc. W. Lundbeck has also collected a by no means small material in the Icelandic fjords, and Vice-Admiral C. Wandel has brought home a number of forms from the deep water round Iceland (and from Davis Straits); several others, as Mag. sc.A. Ditlevsen, Cand. mag.B.Semundsson, The Ingolf-Expedition. III. 2. I 2 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. Mag. sc. H. Jonsson, First Lieutenant in the navy E. Jensen have made smaller contributions. In 1903 and following years Dr. J.Schmidt the leader on the investigation-steamer «Thor» collected a large material of Crustacea, both pelagic and bottom forms, in the waters round the Feeroes and Iceland, especially south of Iceland. Dr. Schmidt has brought home a number of Euphausiacea and Mysidacea, as also some Decapoda, which have not previously been taken within the region mentioned. In my earlier work on the Malacostraca from West Greenland, I have given a complete list of the Danish and Swedish sources from which the material then described was derived; I may there- fore merely refer here to that report, published in 1887. Since then, Prof. D. Bergendal (of Lund) and Mag. sc. M. P.A.Traustedt have made a number of dredgings at several places along the west coast of Greenland and have each brought home forms of interest; smaller contributions are due to Captain in the navy C. Ryder, Pastor H.Sorensen and others. Further, considerable tracts along the east of Greenland from ca. 651/, N.L. to ca. 74'/, N.L. have been investigated by three Danish expeditions, conducted respectively by Capt.in the navy C. Ryder in 1891—92 and by Capt. in the navy G. Amdrupin 1898—99 and 1900. On the first of these expeditions the collections were made by Cand. E. Bay and Cand. med. H. Deichmann, on the last two by respectively Cand. med. K. Poulsen and Mag. sc. Soren Jensen. Lastly, Mag. sc. C. Kruuse has brought home a number of forms from the region about Angmagsalik. In addition to the mentioned sources of the material dealt with here there is still another, but it must be mentioned by itself. In 1902 Dr. J. Hjort carried out investigations with his steamer «Michael Sars» in the waters between the Feroes and Shetland, also east, south and south-west of the Feroes and to a small extent north-west of these islands. Cand. mag. Ad. Jensen was one of the accompanying naturalists and brought home numerous Crustacea — especially the smaller forms living on hydroids ete. — but the great majority of the class mentioned were collected by Dr. A. Appelldéf and taken to the Bergen Museum. A part of this material, which came from the warm area, was at my request kindly handed over to me for investigation and is included in the follow- ing pages. It is a relatively moderate number of species of Malacostraca which have been collected by one or several of the Danish or foreign expeditions which have not likewise been taken by the «Ingolf». On the other hand the «Ingolf» has taken hundreds of species which have not been found by any other within the waters in question, and a large number of these species are also new to science. This with the foregoing explanation is the reason why I have included and endeavoured to collect in one place all that could be found in the Copenhagen Museum and in the literature, in order to throw light on the Crustacean fauna of the waters round our northern dependencies. — My paper on the Malacostraca of West Greenland, published in 1887, was based almost to an equal extent on material belonging to the Copenhagen Museum and to the Riks- museum in Stockholm; our Museum’s part of that material has again been examined along with the material from the «Ingolf». Where many localities are noted in the work mentioned for any species only a summary of these is given here, but if very few localities are mentioned these are again noted; errors in determination are, it need hardly be said, distinctly pointed out. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 3 Under «occurrence» are given the discoveries within the region definitely defined above for the purpose of this investigation; under «distribution» the localities outside this region. Both and especially the distribution have caused the author considerable practical difficulties and some remarks on this subject will for several reasons be of service. All the «Ingolf» localities are mentioned under each species. On the other hand, it would take up far too much space to give all the localities for a number of common species living in shallow water, especially for a no small number of Decapoda; in such cases I have contented myself with summaries for each main section of the coasts. In many cases, however, it is a matter of opinion how much might be usefully included and the correctness of the view adopted may indeed always be combated; some will undoubtedly think that I give too many details, others perhaps that I give too few. While it is difficult enough sometimes to find a suitable mean with regard to how many details based on our own investigations should be given, it becomes still more difficult to determine how much should be noted of the data of other authors concerning the occurrence of any species within the region mentioned. Sometimes the inclusion of such data is superfluous as I myself have seen the species from the same and quite adjacent localities, yet the exclusion of a citation may sometimes be considered as due to lack of knowledge or a slight. In other cases these older data are of doubtful quality — sometimes even the supposed data prove incorrect when the authors specimens are examined — so that the question of their inclusion or omission becomes even more difficult. If I were to indicate all the earlier notices and in every little case of doubt give a criticism, I should certainly succeed in securing myself against the complaint mentioned, but it is very doubtful whether I should advance science by being so unnecessarily prolix. What I include of the literature therefore depends upon personal opinion, but I have endeavoured to give a correct and complete picture for each species. The distribution both geographical and bathymetric is given for each species. We often meet with a kind of list of the distribution of each species in the literature, but such a list’s contents are too often defective, inexact or uncritical. It is defective when the author has passed over older and probably correct data of localities of real interest, it is inexact when the author for example mentions Greenland without distinguishing whether a form is known from one of the two so diverse seas as those at West Greenland and North-East Greenland (from the more southerly East Greenland only a little is known from Angmagsalik). And it is not rarely tangibly uncritical, which is the worst, when one finds in a list statements of occurrence or distribution which depend upon incorrect determinations on the part of the author or his predecessors. In the Decapoda, Mysidacea and two other smaller orders there is fortunately slight possibility of difficulties of this kind, but it is very common in the Tana- idacea for example and especially the Amphipoda. These shortcomings have obliged me, especially for the Decapoda, to undertake a work which I found very great, possibly greater than the matter was worth from the present standpoint of our knowledge, in order to give a somewhat complete and at the same time as far as possible critical report on. the geographical distribution of many species —so far as this is known at present. But it has to be added, that there are very few species of which it may be said that our knowledge is complete, the boundaries either in America, or north of Asia, or in the south of Europe or west of Africa being very imperfectly known. It is also the case, at least for a number of species, that the depth at which a given form occurs in one sea is much less than D had 4 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. that at which the same form occurs at least as a rule and often exclusively in another sea. Certain species which are found in the Kara Sea at less depths than 100 fm. are only met with in the cold area of the northern Ocean at several hundred fathoms; thus Zusirvus Holmit H. J. H. was founded on specimens from g1 and 93!/, fm. in the Kara Sea; in the waters N.W. of Spitsbergen the Nor- wegian North-Atlantic Expedition took it in 260 fm.; in the waters between Jan Mayen, Iceland and Norway the same expedition found it at two stations, the «Ingolf» at seven, and these nine stations were at depths from 293 to 780 fm. In the Kattegat some species occur in shallower water than anywhere round our northern dependencies. It may thus be of importance to know, not only the least and greatest depth at which a species occurs within its territory taken as a whole, but also the limits of depth for its occurrence in different parts of the same territory. Unfortunately gaps probably occur in my account of some species with regard to their occurrence on the Atlantic coast of the Spanish peninsula and at the Canary Isles, the reason. being that the necessary literature is not avail- able in Copenhagen. Some remarks may perhaps be added here on faunistic catalogues. The literature on the Malacostraca is rich in such lists, but unfortunately several and sometimes indeed not a few of the determinations in the most of these works are not to be depended upon and sometimes even demon- strably incorrect. This is just the great danger in using faunistic catalogues, namely, that one cannot be sure in numerous cases that the determination is correct; by carefully using several systematic papers or a single large paper of an author, one gets to know the extent of his carefulness and of his observing and critical abilities, and from this knowledge one may judge of the trustworthiness of his determinations of species, when he has not included in these any remarks on structural features from which one can to a certain extent or with certainty conclude for oneself, whether the determina- tions are correct. But even the most careful and keen-sighted author does not escape on occasion from making an error in determination, which often cannot be detected at all in a faunistic list. The best list known to me with numerous descriptions of new species are those in the excellent papers of S. I. Smith on the Decapoda of the east coast of North America. Even the list prepared by G.O.Sars on the Crustacea of the Norwegian North-Atlantic Expedition contains several errors, at least as regards the Isopoda and Amphipoda, which he has corrected later in his splendid work, «An Account of the Crustacea of Norway». But when a author so prominent and with such detailed knowledge of Norwegian Crustacea could make several such errors of determinations in a large work like that on the forms of this class taken by the expedition mentioned, confidence in the trustworthiness of faun- istic catalogues must decline to a great degree. There are also various lists in which I can place no confidence for a number of species, even though such lists may display many citations and thus show knowledge of the literature, for the reason that this learning is not necessarily accompanied by exact investigation or by critical judgment etc. My confidence in catalogues of species is constantly growing less and less as the years go on, the more so as various journeys have given me the opportunity of finding out very remarkable errors of determination in earlier works on examining the original speci- mens. It is almost desirable that authors would be less industrious in publishing faunistic lists, especially those on difficult groups and on the fauna of a small stretch of coast, or frequent small additions to older lists. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 5 Nevertheless, I am myself guilty here of publishing a faunistic list. It would, however, be meaningless to give new descriptions of the species (with figures) of all the northern-arctic Decapoda, most of which have been described several or even many times, and for example to describe and figure the Cumacea, Isopoda and Amphipoda which have been so excellently dealt with in Sars’ standard work mentioned above. But wherever on going through my large material I have met with a note- worthy difference between my specimens and the work noted by me as the chief publication regarding the species in question, I have displayed the differences discovered by notes and often likewise by figures, so that a possible error of determination may be controlled by a successor, who in one or other regard has better material or more critical ability. With this object in view I have marked with ! the work or the two works for each species which contain the best description of the form; also, under «remarks» I have sometimes briefly mentioned one or several of the principal specific characteristics. I have thus done what I could to give the users of this work the greatest possible control as regards my own determinations, and hope further that these measures of circumspection may be a good example to others who in future wish to publish faunistic catalogues of Crustacea. With regard to species which have been described several or many times it has seldom been my intention to refer to all the previous descriptions and figures in the synonymy list. I only give a greater or less selection which always contains the first description and the one or two best (marked as mentioned above). In the synonymy list no reference is ever given to mere lists of names, and reference is only made to a work if it contains either a description or a figure or at least remarks of importance for the recognition of the species. I may add, that I have always used the works cited under each species, except in the cases where these were not available and then I mention the source of my citation. It is very common to find that authors give citations of descriptions of a species and of localities, where these are only mentioned in the same way, so that one cannot see whether there is in the work cited only a name and some localities or likewise a description; in this way the synonymy list swells up to an unreasonable extent and at the same time becomes not nearly so reliable or so useful as a list much shorter but carefully chosen. Another and not very rare bad habit is that an author, in a synonymy list for example, cites a treatise he either does not know or has not looked at in the case in question, but has copied it from another’s list; it happens that such slackness can be detected, when the author in his citation includes the written or printed error found. in the citation of his predecessor by a third person. Under «occurrence» and «distribution» I have generally given for each locality or small group of localities the author or the authors as the source of information but not mentioned the works; and except where the contrary is stated I have everywhere examined the source myself. It is only when I have studied specimens from the same coast that I omit frequently any reference to earlier notices; where therefore no author is named for a locality or for several localities mentioned immediately after one another, that means that our Museum owns the species in question from these localities. For a large number of the earlier described species I have given the length — sometimes also other measurements — of the largest specimen seen by me, as also the place where it was taken; in several cases these sizes are greater than those hitherto known for the species in question. For some 6 . CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA, forms there has been occasion to describe changes in the size of the species according to the localities with a little more detail. It is not possible at this place to give the more general results which may be deduced from the following account of the data. When the Malacostraca (and in the end all Crustacea) are com- pletely worked out, it will be possible to give a summary such as that mentioned and to base it securely on references. A few introductory remarks will be given for the separate orders, but on the other hand it has been considered unnecessary to give lists of the literature. Lastly, the author wishes it to be distinctly understood that his beginning with the Decapoda does not mean that he considers them higher than the other orders. ‘The arrangement of the orders has nothing to do with this question, as it has been chosen out of regard for considerations which have nothing to do with the systematic arrangement of the Crustacea, namely, such as were imposed by the work itself and which tended only to make a convenient subdivision of the work for the author and for publication. I. The Order Decapoda. Although the order Decapoda could very naturally in my opinion embrace the Euphausiacea the distance between ELuphausia and Sergestes and Peneus not being greater than that between Peneus and Homarus or between Homarus and Dromia, yet I have placed the Euphausiacea here as an order by themselves. It seems to be an insoluble task to divide this order in a perfectly natural manner into sub- orders. Some authors hold to the old division of Brachyura, Anomura and Macrura (to which the Euphausiacea might thus be added as a fourth suborder); the division is very practical but not of great scientific value. Other authors accept the division made by J. E. V. Boas in 1880 into Reptantia and Natantia. That these two names are in themselves badly chosen is naturally of minor importance if the division otherwise were good. It should be noted, however, that the great majority of the Natantia are bottom-animals, some even live in holes in coral blocks or in sponges; it is also inter- esting to notice that the few genera, whose representatives really swim in the upper or deeper water- layers, always so to speak possess peculiar characteristics; thus the two posterior pairs of thoracic legs in Sergestes are modified to true swimmerets while Pasiphaé, Hymenodora and Acanthephyra have retained in use the outer branches of the thoracic legs; lastly, Polybius Henslowi which belongs to the Reptantia and lives a true pelagic life has all four pairs of its walking legs transformed to swimmerets. But, for the rest, I may spare myself the trouble of giving further proof of the bad quality of the two diagnoses, each with ca. 30 characters, which Boas sets up for his two suborders mentioned. In «Germanisering af Dansk Videnskab”, Copenhagen, 1895, I have reviewed each of the characters in question one by one and showed that of all the 30 characters there is only one (or per- haps 1!/,) which really holds good — and in the same year the quality of the character left was criticised by Th. List. In my opinion it will prove impossible to divide the order Decapoda into 2, 3 or 4 suborders CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 7 in a completely satisfactory manner, but on the other hand one can set up a long series of excellent groups with one to several families in each group. Meanwhile, for the sake of a general view, the old division into Brachyura, Anomura and Macrura is retained. The “Ingolf’s catch of Decapoda was relatively not large; the northerly seas, as is well-known, are tolerably poor in species of this order. Nevertheless, the following account will give an important addition to the geographical distribution towards the north of a number of the deep-water forms known from somewhat more southerly regions of the Atlantic. Especially interesting in this regard is a comparison with the fauna known, as the result of the American deep-water investigations and S. I. Smith’s excellent descriptions, from the tract between ca. 35° and 45° N. L. off the east coast of America. It appears that most of the deep-water species collected by the “Ingolf” outside of the cold area are noted by Smith from the region mentioned, but this author has certainly three to four times as many species as the “Ingolf’. The Danish ship has not made nearly so many hauls in deep water on bottom with positive temperatures as the Americans; if we had had several times more dredgings from the waters south of southerly Greenland, we should quite certainly have obtained many more of the species known from about 40° N. L., but I doubt whether we should have got much more than the half of Smith’s species. Although the investigations are thus far from sufficient to show the true extent of the decapod deep-water fauna of the most northerly parts of the Atlantic in comparison with that of more southerly latitudes, yet the following account will give very interesting and new information regarding the distribution of a number of more southerly species far to the north in deep-water areas, the coastal fauna of which has a somewhat arctic character. On the other hand, it can be said that of the Decapoda living from the beach down to ca. 200fm. in the waters round Greenland and Iceland as also on the north and west sides of the Fzroes extremely few species will be discovered in future which are not dealt with in this work. More exact knowledge however may naturally be gradually obtained of the geographical and bathymetric distribution of the various species within the region mentioned, and especially a much more complete knowledge than the present concerning’ the tempera- ture occurring at the coldest and in the warmest periods of the year in the depths in which the species live at their different localities. After these remarks this may perhaps be a suitable place to insert some critical notes on an apparently somewhat variable yet very wide-spread view regarding what is meant by arctic and boreal or subarctic, that is, on the zoogeographical question concerning the fauna, both coastal and deep-water fauna, in the more northerly seas of the globe. It is in other words the marine Arthropoda in the great, as yet incomplete, work Fauna Arctica published by F. R6mer and F. Schau- dinn — which requires a closer investigation. Most of the contributions published hitherto (1906) are almost entirely compilations, as the material the various contributors have had from the “Helgoland” Ex- pedition is comparatively speaking extremely small. One of the carcinological papers in this work is almost quite useless, and of others it may be said that their plan and execution are so unfortunate that they will certainly contribute more to confuse than to clear up the ideas on arctic and boreal fauna in the minds of the majority of the Zoologists who may -use them. I was led into this literary investigation by becoming acquainted with Dr. F. Doflein’s treatment of the Decapoda in “Fauna Arc- 8 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. tica” (B. I, p. 313—62), and it will not be denied that I have the most valid reasons possible fot making a very detailed reference to this work, which deals with all the Decapoda taken north of 60° N. L. and likewise includes a number of forms only taken much farther south. Further, in an extensive foot-note I shall make some remarks on one of the other papers so far published on the Arthropoda in “Fauna Arctica”, namely, the work on the Pantopoda; this latter work is in one way excellently suited to serve as a type and there are also special reasons for mentioning it more parti- cularly, as the work on the “Ingolf’s Pantopoda is referred to in it. As an introduction to my remarks on the part of “Fauna Arctica” which concerns me most, the following may be mentioned. A destructive criticism of the principle underlying the choice of the boundary between arctic and boreal fauna, which is followed by H. Ludwig in his treatment of the Holothurida (and Asterida) in the work mentioned, has come from Dr. Hj. Ostergren (Bergens Mu- seums Aarbog 1902, No.9). Ostergren states, that Ludwig has simply taken the polar circle (i. e. 667/;° N. L.) as this boundary-line, whereas it has long been known, that on the American coast Cape Cod at 42° N. L. forms the boundary between the arctic and the boreal coastal fauna, and on the other hand the west coast of Norway and its fjords right up to the North Cape, 71° 10' N. L., has an essentially boreal fauna both as regards even the more littoral (o—5o0 fm.) and especially the areas in deeper water (100—400 to 500 fm.). He does not enter into details regarding the more littoral fauna from the North Cape to Nova Zembla. The geographical boundaries for the true deep-water fauna are entirely different, as the cold area of the Northern Ocean with bottom-temperatures under o° C. extends between the ridge off Norway on the one side and Iceland and the Feeroes on the other, then in between the Feeroes and Scotland almost to 60° N. L. (the boundaries of the cold area can be seen in the work on the Norwegian North-Atlantic Expedition), and with Ostergren one may suitably choose 0° C. as the boundary for the arctic deep-water fauna. It may be recalled here that we find positive bottom-temperatures to the west of the cold area, and the deep water of the Atlantic with a part of its fauna pushes up into Denmark Straits and Davis Straits. Ludwig’s work is chiefly a compilation, and Ostergren shows a number of errors of different kinds and origin. But Ludwig in the opinion of Zoologists expert in his subject has published ex- tremely valuable systematic papers on Holothurida etc, whilst several of the other contributors to “Fauna Arctica” have certainly known comparatively little of the groups on which they wrote, a fact which now and then is not without some influence on the compilation. We may turn now to the consideration of Doflein’s work on the Decapoda. On p. 316 the author writes: “Ich habe mich -- — — zu einem Kompromiss entschlossen, indem ich diejenigen de- kapoden Krebse auffiihre, welche die Meere nérdlich von 60° n. Br. regelmassig beherbergen; dabei habe ich aber die Angehérigen arktischer Familien, welche sich infolge von besonderen Verhaltnissen weiter nach Siideri ausbreiten, mitberiicksichtigt, so besonders die Bewohner der Kaltwassergebiete an der Ost- und Westkiiste von Nordamerika. Haben doch die Erfahrungen der letzten Jahrzehnte be- wiesen, dass Tiefseeformen siidlicher Gebiete nicht selten das Flachwasser der kalten Zonen bewoh- nen; — — —”. If the “siidliche Gebiete” mean the Gulf of Gascogue or the region explored by the “Travailleur” and “Talisman”, it will be extremely difficult and probably impossible, to show a single CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 9 species of Malacostraca which occurs as a deep-water form within these parts of the Atlantic and at the same time in “das Flachwasser der kalten Zonen”. Using the statement cited as basis Doflein has included a number of species of Lithodinz, even two which are only known from San Francisco in California. It is thus unfortunate for him that no species of the group Lithodine is arctic, not even Lithodes maa, which is not littoral, nor so far as I know found anywhere in negative bottom- temperatures. It is a typically boreal species which extends into the Murman Sea and has been taken west of Bear Island, in nearly 100 fm. and at West Spitzbergen. This being the case, Doflein’s long list of Lithodinz can only serve to confuse the view. His “Uebersicht der horizontalen und verti- kalen Verbreitung der arktischen Decapoden” (p. 359) in which there should only be “die sicheren und im arktischen Gebiet nachgewiesenen Arten” contains for example several typical Atlantic forms, which are neither arctic nor taken in arctic waters, as will be shown later in dealing with the sep- arate: species. We read on p. 360: “Die Schriften von Hansen waren mir leider unzuginglich”; at the same place however he gives the titles of the two largest of my (3) papers, which are of special importance here, namely, the paper in the “Djimphna” Expedition and that on the Malacostraca of West Green- land. These two papers are however sometimes found to be on sale in German second-hand book- sellers’ shops (according to their catalogues) and in any case they are still the principal works on all the Malacostraca from the waters along West Greenland (60°—73° N. L.) and the Kara Sea, which two seas ought to have had some interest for the author. Had he obtained these papers he would have been able to escape for example so patent an error as is contained in almost all his statements on Sclerocrangon salebrosus. He has also been unfortunate however with a fourth of my papers. He has, namely, two species of Sergestes and refers in the synonymy list under S. A/eyeri Metzg. to my work in the Proc. Zool. Soc. 1896, but, as he does not mention what I have stated about .S. A/eyeri nor the page, he has obviously not seen my paper, and I must suppose that the Proceedings Zoolog. Society of London have also not been available to him. His lack of knowledge of my paper has however brought misfortune to him, as I show in it that the two species he constantly gives as distinct are identical and should have the name of the second, .S. avcticus Kr. Again, in 1858 M. Sars wrote concerning Stenorhynchus rostratus I, that “in the north it does not reach to Greenland”, and con- cerning Carcinus menas that it “is lacking at Greenland”. Under both species Doflein (p. 351 and 355) cites this very work of M. Sars (“Oversigt over de i den norsk-arctiske Region forekommende Krebsdyr”, Videnskabsselsk. Forhandl. for 1858) as the source for the statement that they were taken at Greenland. One might here indeed blame M. Sars for causing a future eager compilator in his haste to read wrongly, because the word “Greenland” was named under these species. Dr. Doflein says in his “Kinleitung” concerning the literature: “Wenn ich trotzdem keine absolute Vollstandigkeit er- reichen konnte, wovon ich iiberzeugt bin — — —”, this his conviction has been in great degree cor- rect — but one is then tempted to wonder whether, when such an extremely voluminous work of compilation is found in place after place to be uncritical, inaccurate or defective, there is not a great probability of its doing more harm than good. In the following pages it will be necessary for me to show various other inaccuracies in Doflein’s work so as to contribute to their eradication. His remarks on Sabinea septemcarinata Sab. and S. Sarsii Smith (p. 328), on Hippolyte spinus Sow. H. Phippsit Kr. The Ingolf-Expedition. III. 2. ’ = Io CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. and Hf. macilenta Kr, show that his investigation of nature is not any deeper or more trustworthy than of the literature?. , A. Brachyura. 1. Stenorhynchus longirostris Fabr. 1775. Cancer longirostris J. C. Fabricius, Syst. Entom. p. 408. ! 1863. Stenorhynchus longirostris Heller, Crust. stidl. Eur. p. 23, Taf. I, Fig. 1-2. 1900. _ a A. M.-Edwards & E. L. Bouvier, Exped. Scient. du Travailleur et du Talisman, Crust. Dec. I, p. 156, Pl. XXII, fig. 6. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” has not taken this species, but it is to hand from two other sources. Feroe Bank (Dr. Jorgensen); 1 specimen. — — 60°55'N.L., 8° 56' W. L., 69 fm., temp. 9°3° (“Michael Sars”, 1902); 1 spec. The first-named bank is most probably the same as the second; it lies south-west of the Feeroes. Distribution. The locality just mentioned is the most northerly hitherto observed for the distribution of this somewhat southerly species. It was known previously however from 59° 12’ N. L., 5° 57'E.L. (Norman), from the Shetland Isles (Norman), the Hebrides (Norman), further south in the Irish Sea (Walker), Cornwall and Devon (Norman), and places on the east coast of England, North- t In “Fauna Arctica” B. 11 (p. 35—94) is found “Arktische und subarktische Pantopoden. Zusammengestellt von K, Mobius”. In the “Allgemeiner Teil” (p. 38) we read: “— — — Michael Sars und G. Ossian Sars, sowie nach ihnen viele andere Faunisten des nordéstlichen Atlantischen Oceans betrachten den nérdlichen Polarkreis als Grenzlinie zwischen dem Wohngebiet der arktischen und subarktischen Seetiere’; the number after G. O. Sars’ name refers to a footnote which gives the title of Mollusca Reg. arct. Norveg. 1878. But in the cited work of Sars of 1878 this excellent author does nothing of the kind; on the contrary, he states (p. 2) that “the whole of the deep region along our southern and northern coast to North Cape thus belongs undoubtedly to the warm area, and the ice-cold water which fills the great basin below 300 fm. in the ocean lying beyond right to the level of Stadt (ca. 62° N. L.) is everywhere marked off from the coast by the long ex- tended barrier — — —”. This citation alone is surely sufficient to prove that Sars in 1878 already did not set the boundary “gwischen dem Wohngebiet” of the arctic and boreal maritie animals at the Polar Circle. Sars did something quite different; he investigated the character of the fauna at the different places and then determined where it was arctic and where not. He brought into his work the forms found on the Norwegian coast north of the Polar Circle, but he showed that the fauna in deeper water along the west coast of Norway right to the North Cape was indeed not arctic. It is possible — though cer- tainly extremely doubtful — that “viele andere Faunisten des nordéstlichen Atlantischen Oceans” have in the period from 1878 to 1900 considered the northern Polar Circle as the boundary between “dem Wohngebiet” of the arctic and boreal marine forms; if so, then these “Faunisten” have shown almost as little acquaintance with what they were writing about as a number of the authors in ‘Fauna Arctica’. — Even if G. O. Sars had written in 1878 what K. Mobius ascribes to him, it would still never be permitted to retain such a view in our time after the publication of the Norwegian North-Atlantic Ex- pedition Report and of the Hydrography in the ‘Ingolf’ Expedition Report. In spite of some speculation I have not succeeded in understanding how any one could formulate the principle which the author employs in the elaboration of the lists given p. 41, on “rein arktische Pantopoden” and on those that are “Arktisch und subarktisch”. The species which the ‘“Ingolf’ has taken in deep to very deep water with positive bottom-temperatures round the southern part of Greenland are noted as “arktische”, if they are not known from more southern regions, otherwise as “arktische und subarktische’ — and in both cases the procedure is perfectly incorrect. Thus, for example, Padlene acus Mein., Padlene hastata Mein. and Pallenopsis plumipes Mein, are made “rein arktische”, but Paranymphon spinosum Caull., Colossendeis colossea Wils. and C. macerrima Wils. arctic and subarctic — in both cases quite incorrectly, as all 6 species are deep-water species in the Atlantic. Some of them were taken earlier much more to the south than by the “Ingolf’, and all 6 might be expected to be distributed in the greater part of the Atlantic, a few even perhaps in the Pacific, but such species could not easily be considered either arctic or subarctic, just as little as the deep-water Decapoda taken at South Greenland mentioned in this work, for example, the two species of Polycheles, Galacantha rostrata, etc. That Mébius should make such references is all the more strange as, following Meinert, he gives both depth and bottom-temperature for the 6 species named. Such references can only do harm. — For the rest the work seems to be a careful summary of the literature and localities; the original contributions — in the form of remarks on some species — are, in agreement with the title of the treatise, extremely few; the whole might best be consid- ered as almost superfluous literature of rather less use than the reverse. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. II umberland (Norman), S. E. from Yarmouth (Metzger), Belgium (v. Beneden), on the English-Normandy Islands (Koehler), Concarneau (Bonnier), Gulf of Gascogne and further south to the Canary and Cape Verde Islands to 17° N. L. (A. M.-Edwards and Bouvier). It also occurs in the Mediterranean (Heller, Gourret, Adensamer etc.) and is said to occur in the Black Sea (Czerniavsky, teste Ortmann). Concerning its bathymetric distribution the following may be said. Bonnier states that it occurs in depths from ca. 5 to 30 fm. on the coast of Britany; Heller gives 25 to 4o fm. for the Mediterranean, Gourret ca. 10 to 33 for Marseilles Bay, Adensamer 54 to 62 fm. for the Adriatic Sea, Caullery 96 to 212 im. for the Gulf of Gascogne, A. M-Edwards & Bouvier 41 to 223 fm. for several places in the Atlantic (Cadiz to Cape Verde Islands), lastly 870 fm. for a single specimen taken off Morocco. The last I consider as improbable until further information is forthcoming, and believe that it has arisen from some error or another (e. g. that the specimen has been in the trawl from an earlier station). Apart from this it appears that the species occurs uniformly at all depths from ca. 5 fm. to a little over 200 fm. but that it is more rarely found in shallower water than 10 to 20 fm. 2. Lispognathus Thomsoni Norm. 1873. Dorynchus Thomsoni Norman, in Wyv. Thomson, Depths of the Sea, p. 174, fig. 34. 1886. Lispognathus — Miers, Challenger Brachyura, p. 28, Pl. V, fig. 2. = —- — S. I. Smith, Rep. Comm. Fish and Fisher. f. 1885, p. 18, Pl. I, figs. r—ra. ! 1900. — _ A. M.-Edwards & E. L. Bouvier, Exped. Scient. du Travailleur et du Talis- man, Crust. Dec., I, p. 146, Pl. III, figs. 8, Pl. XXI, fig. 8—14. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” has taken this species at the following ro stations. West of Iceland: St.97: 65° 28’N. L., 27° 39’ W. L., 450 fm., temp. 5°5°; 4 spec. Uae’ eee "GG. Od AS a OO SOS EG is eae - 89: 64° 45° — 27°20 — 310 — — 84°93 I — eas ao - 9g: 64°18 — 27°00°' — 295 — — 58°; 2 — South-West ofIceland: - 81: 61°44’ — 27°00! — 485 — — 61°; 12 — = a - 84: 62°58’ — 25°24 — 633 — — 48; 3 — ay a ge 93: 62° Ss eee GS 55°34 — South of Iceland: - 7: 63°13' — 15°4r' — 600 — — 45°; 1 — Brad — - 54: 63°08’ — 15°40 — 691 —- — 39°; 2 — pe - 57: 63°37, — 13°02) — 350 — — 34°95 2 — It has also been taken at: 64° 42’ N. L., 27° 43' W. L., 426 fm., temp. 6°, 2 spec. (Wandel); 62° 57’ N. L., 19° 58’ W.L,., ca. 500 fm., “Thor” 1903. Distribution. All the localities of the “Ingolf’, Wandel and “Thor” lie west and south of Iceland; the depth is between 265 and 691 fm., the temperature from 3:4° to 84°. The species was originally taken in the warm area in the Feroe Channel (Wyv. Thomson), later S. W. of Ireland, 250 fm. (Pocock), in the Gulf of Gascogne, 346—750 fm. (Caullery), also in the Atlantic from the Bay of Biscay, Portugal, Morocco, the Azores, the Canary and Cape Verde Islands in 120 to 1106 fm. (A. M-Edw. & Bouvier); in the Mediterranean at the level of Marseilles (A. M-~Edwards) and a number of places in the Adriatic 2* I2 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. in 330—670 fm, (Adensamer). It has been taken off the east coast of America at a little below 40° N. L,, 225—318 fm. (Smith), if Smith’s determination is correct; A. M.~Edwards & E. L. Bouvier (op. cit. p. 151) namely considered a form taken by the “Blake” at Grenada as belonging to an independent species, L. furcillatus A. M.-E., and the specimens mentioned by Smith belong to Z. furcillatus A. M.-E., so that the question arises whether Z. furciliatus is only a variety or an independent species. In the “Chal- lenger” Z. Zhomsoni is given from the Agulhas Bank, South Africa, 35° 4’ S. L., 18° 37' E. L., 150 fm. Doflein states that it has been taken several times in the waters off Cape Colony in so small depths, as 56, 82 and 168 fm. further in the Indian Ocean at St. Paul, Sumatra and East Africa in depths from 357 to 459 fm. Miers did not venture to separate a specimen taken near Sydney in 410 fm. as specifically distinct from Z. Thomson, but this statement of its occurrence at New Holland requires further confirmation. If it should be confirmed by the investigations of a Zoologist who is an excellent judge of species that the determinations from all the localities mentioned are correct, this species must have an extremely wide distribution. It occurs as a rule in depths between ca. 250 and 700 fm., though met with at a little less than 60 fm. and down to ca. 1130 fm. 3. Scyramathia Carpenteri Norm. 1873. Amathia Carpenteri Norman, in Wyv. Thomson, The Depths of the Sea, p. 175, fig. 35. ! 1885. Scyramathia — G. O. Sars, Norske Nordhavs Exped., Crust. I, p.6, Pl. I, figs. 1—7. 1894. _ a A. M.-Edwards & Bouvier, Rés. des Camp. sc. de l’Hirondelle, fase. VII, p. 13. ! Ig00. a _ A. M-Edwards & Bouvier, Exped. Scient. du Travailleur et du Talisman, Crust. Dec. I, p. 133, Pl. XX, figs. 1—10. Occurrence. The species has not been taken by the “Ingolf”, but by later expeditions: South of Iceland: 62°57’ N. L., 19° 58’ W. L., 500 fm., (“Thor” 1903); 1 spec. South-West of the Feeroes: 61° 15’ N. L., 9° 35’ W. L., 500 fm., (“Thor” 1904); 2 spec. . a 61° 7" 9° 33 — 425—460 fm., (“Michael Sars” 1902); 1 spec. _ - - 61° 08! — 9°28’ — 450 fim. (“Thor” 1903); 1 spec. — - _ 59° 28’ — 8° 1' — 580—687 fm., (“Michael Sars” 1902); 8 spec. Distribution. This species was originally taken on the so-called “Holtenia ground” in the warm part of the Fzeroe Channel (Wyv. Thomson). Later it was taken between Norway and the Shet- lands at 61° 41'N. L,, 3° 19 E. L., 220 fm. (G.O. Sars); S. W. of Ireland in 110—250 fm. (Pocock); the Gulf of Gascogne in 345 and 511 fm. (Caullery); at the Azores in 450 to 620 fm. (A. M.Edwards & Bouvier); at various places along the south-west coast of Europe and the north-west coast of Africa, from the Gulf of Gascogne to the Canary Isles and even more southerly to 25° 39’ N. L., 18° 22’ E. L., in depths from 186 to 724 fm. (A. M.-Edwards & Bouvier). 4. Chionoecetes Opilio O. Fabr. 1780. Cancer Phalangium O. Fabricius, Fauna Groenlandica, no. 214, p. 234. 1788. — Opilio O. Fabricius, Nye Saml. af Kgl. D. Vid. Selsk. Skr., 3. Deel, p. 181, med 1 Tavle. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 13 1838. Chionoecetes Opilio Kroyer, Nat. Tidsskr., B. II, p. 249. 1849. _ — _ Voy. en Scand. etc., Crust. Pl. I. 1856. Peloplastus Pallasii Gerstaecker, Arch. f. Naturgesch., 22. Jahrg., B.I, p. 105, PII, fig. 1. 1893. Chionoecetes Opilio M. Rathbun, Proc. US, Nat. Mus, Vol. XVI, p. 74, PL IV, figs. 5—7 (gives the synonymy, but incompletely). 1894. — — A.M.-Edwards & Bouvier, Res. des Camp. sc. de l'Hirondelle, fase. VII, p. 16. Occurrence. This species has been taken by the “Ingolf” at the following locality. Davis Straits: St. 31: 66° 35’ N. L., 55° 54' W. L., 88 fm., temp. 16°; 1 spec. In Malac. Groenl. (p. 28) I have enumerated some localities on the west coast of Greenland; since then I have seen specimens from Ritenbenk, Jakobshavn, Godhavn, Akudlek 30—60 fm. and Holsteenborg. A summary of our knowledge of its occurrence at West Greenland would read: it is known between 66° 56’ N. L. and 70° 42' N. L. from the beach to 350 fm. (the last-mentioned depth, which is very unusual, according to information from Dr. Forsstrand). Distribution. This species hat not been found east of Cape Farewell. It is thus not known from East Greenland nor from the seas north of Europe and Asia; it is only on the north-eastern part of Asia near Behring Straits that it begins at ca. 173° 24' W. L. (Stuxberg). Off the east coast of America it is common at Newfoundland (A. M..-Edw. & Bouvier) and goes down to Nova Scotia and further to Casco Bay, Maine (S. I. Smith). Miss M. Rathbun gives a large number of localities for it from the waters on the north-western part of North America and summarises its occurrence there as follows: “from the Arctic coast of Alaska southward through Bering Strait and along the eastern and western shores of Bering Sea to the Aleutian Islands, where it is found in abundance, and thence east- ward and southward along the Alaskan coast to British Columbia”. Further: “It ranges in depth from shallow water to 206 fathoms on the Atlantic coast and 121 fathoms on the Pacific.” It may not be useless to point out distinctly here, that when A. M-Edwards & Bouvier (1. c. p. 17) begin a summary of the distribution of this species with “Cette espéce n’est pas rare dans les mers froides de l’Europe...”, this statement is quite incorrect. Remarks. The largest specimen I have seen is from Jakobshavn; the carapace is 138'5 mm. long and 141'5 mm. broad, the second leg from the margin of the carapace to the tip 338 mm. 5. Hyas araneus L. 1758. Cancer araneus Linné, Syst. Nat. Ed. X,I, p. 628. 1780, — — O. Fabricius, Fauna Groenl. n. 213, p. 233. 1838. Hyas araneus Kroyer, Kgl. D. Vid. Selsk. naturv. math. Afh. Syvende Deel, p. 314. 11851. — — Brandt, Krebse, in Middendorffs Sibir. Reise, B. II, 1, p. 79—8o. ! — — — coarctatus Hoek, Crust. “Willem Barents”, Nied. Arch. f. Zool. Supplb. I, p. 3, Taf. I, Fig. 1. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” has taken this species at the following localities. : Baffins Bay: St. 33: 67° 57’N. L., 55° 30’ W. L., 35 fm., temp. 08°; 1 spec. Davis Straits: Holsteenborg Havn, in fishing net; 1 spec. =_ St. 31: 66° 35'N. L., 55° 54’ W. L., 88 fm., temp. 16°; 1 spec. 14 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. Davis Straits: St. 29: 65° 34’ N. L., 54° 31’ W. L., 68 fm., temp. 02°; 1 spec. Dyre Fjord, Iceland; many spec. North-West of Iceland: St. 129: 66° 35° N. L., 23° 47’ W. L., 117 fm., temp. 6°5°; 1 spec. North of Iceland: St. 127: 66° 33'N. L., 20° 05’ W. L., 44 fm., temp. 5°6°; 1 spec. Reykjavik, in the harbour; 3 large spec. North-West of the Feeroes: St. 1: 62° 30’ N. L., 8° 21’ W. L., 132 fm., temp. 7:2°; 1 spec. In Malacostr. Groenl. (p.30) I have brought together a number of localities from the west coast of Greenland, and the most northerly of these is Godhavn, at 69'/,° N. L., the most southerly is Godt- haab, at 64° 11’N.L.; the species was taken in 5 to 100 fm. Later investigations have not brought any new data of interest so far as West Greenland is concerned; at East Greenland and Jan Mayen it has not been found. I have seen a large number of specimens from numerous places on the western, northern, eastern and south-eastern coasts of Iceland; the species is there extremely common, as a rule at ca. 5 to 4o fm.; it is likewise common at the Feeroes. Distribution. From the Feroes the species extends southwards to the Shetlands (Norman) and the coasts of Scotland, England and Ireland (Bell, Walker, etc.); it does not seem to have been observed on the west coast of France, but on the other hand it occurs at the Channel Islands (Koehler) and as it is given by H. Milne-Edwards from France it must certainly occur on its north coast; further at Belgium (v. Beneden), Heligoland and several other places in the southern half of the North Sea (Metzger, Meinert), in the Kattegat and northern part of the Sound (Meinert), along the coasts of Norway (M. Sars), at Bear Island and Spitzbergen (G. O. Sars, Doflein, Birula), in the White Sea, along the whole north coast of Europe, in the northern part of the Murman Sea (Knipowitsch); at the eastern end of Jugor Schar (Hansen), at the east coast of Nova Zembla (Stux- berg) and even in the Kara Sea at ca. 60°E.L. Beyond the last-named locality and along the north coast of Asia as far as 177°41'E.L., that is, a distance of -over 100 degrees of longitude, it is not known. On the other hand it occurs along the most easterly part of the north coast of Asia from 1777/;° E. L. to East Cape (Stuxberg)' and in the Sea of Ochotsk (Brandt); but again it is not known from the north-west coast of America. On the north-eastern side of America it has been taken at Labrador, Newfoundland, Gulf of St. Lawrence, Nova Scotia and in the Gulf of Maine south to Cape Cod (Smith, M. Rathbun), and the greatest known depth here is 137 fm., while at Spitzbergen it has been taken once in nearly 170 fm. The species is not known from East Greenland or Jan Mayen; nor according to the above account is it known from the roo degrees of longitude along the north coast of Asia nor from the northern or western coasts of America. Much is wanting therefore to prove it circumpolar; it may be so but there is just as much probability at least for its not being so. The fact, that it has not been taken north of 691/,°N.L. at West Greenland, is not known from arctic America north or north-west of Labrador, nor from East Greenland, is rare in the Kara Sea, while on the other side it goes down to the Channel, shows that the species is not typically arctic but that in its occurrence it has just as much the appearance of being boreal as arctic. Of its bathymetric distribution may be said, that it occurs as a rule in depths of 15 to 70 fm., 1 In 1907 A. Birula casts doubt on Stuxberg’s determination of the specimens from these localities. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 15 but that it is sometimes met with in quite shallow water, while nearly 170 fm. is the greatest depth I have found ascribed to it. Remarks. The largest specimens I have seen were taken in Breidals Vig on the east coast of Iceland in 9—14 fm. (A. C. Johansen), The»largest of these is a male which has the following dimensions: length of cephalothorax 110 mm., breadth of this 86 mm., length of the first pair of legs 152 mm., distance between the tips of the second pair of legs 392 mm. 6. Hyas coarctatus Leach. 1815. Hyas coarctatus Leach, Transact. Linn. Soc. Lond., Vol. XI, p. 329. ? — — Cuvier, Le Régne animal, Edit. ace. de Planches grav., Pl. 32, fig. 3. !1851. — — Brandt, Krebse, in Middendorffs Sibir. Rejse, B. II, 1, p. 81. 1893. — - M. Rathbun, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., Vol. XVI, p. 60. Occurrence. This species has been taken by the “Ingolf” at the following stations. Davis Straits: St. 31: 66° 35’ N. L., 55° 54’ W. L., 88 fm., temp. 1°6°; 9 spec. Be Bel sh Aes due AY ca. ne ae ore — - 26: 63°57) — 52a°4r — 34 — — o6 5 1 — — Mouth of Ameralik Fjord by Godthaab, 5—70 fm, 1 — West of Iceland: St. 98: 65° 38’ N. L., 26° 27' W. L., 138 fm., temp. 5°9°; 1 spec. North-West of Iceland: St. 129: 66° 35’N. L., 23° 47’ W.L., 117 tm., temp. 6'5°; 3 spec. North of Iceland: St. 127: 66° 33'N. L., 20° 5’ W. L., 44 fm., temp. 5°6°; 7 spec. West of Iceland in Brede Fjord: St. 87; 65° 2'N. L., 23° 56’ W. L., 110 fm., temp. ?; 36 spec. o sai eee et ee og 48 76 Qs South South-East of Iceland: St. 6: 63° 43'N. L., 14° 34’ W. L., 90 fm., temp. 7; 4 spec. In Malac. Groenl. I have mentioned a number of localities for this species between 70° 25’ N. L. and 60° 43'N.L. along the west coast of Greenland, depths from 5 to 100 fm.; later discoveries have not extended our knowledge. It has also been taken on all four coasts of Iceland at numerous localities; it is common at the Feroes and it has twice been taken in 150 fm. It has not been found at East Greenland or Jan Mayen. Distribution. From the Feeroes it extends southwards over the Shetlands and the Hebrides to the east and west coasts of Scotland and England (Norman, etc.); it has been taken on the south coast of England (Bell), in the Irish Sea (Walker), S. W. of Ireland in 250 fm. (Pocock), at the Channel Islands in 1o—20 meters (Koehler) and at Roscoff on the north coast of France (Delage); also at Belgium (v. Beneden), eastern part of the North Sea andSkager Rak (Metzger), Kattegatand northern part of theSound (Meinert), from the last-named northwards along the whole of the west coast of Scandinavia and at East Finmark (M. Sars), Magdalene Bay on the west side of Spitzbergen (G. O. Sars) and along the north coast of Europe in the Murman Sea to 49° E. L. (Birula), but not in the White Sea (Birula); further east, it is not known with certainty and neither on the west or east coast of Nova Zembla nor in the Kara Sea. (I think that Stuxberg’s statement in 1886 of its occurrence in the Kara Sea is incorrect, undoubtedly due to the example of Hoek (see synonymy list to H. avaneus), as Stuxberg in 16 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. his first work of 1882 had also stated that it was H. arvaneus which occurred in the Kara Sea and he does not mention 7. coarctatus at that place). It is also very common in Bering Straits to 71° 02‘ N. L. (M. Rathbun); on the east coast of Asia it ‘has been taken at East Cape and Plover Bay (M. Rathbun), on the Corean coast at 37° 2'N. L., 129° 31’ E. L. (Suenson, in Copenhagen Museum), and a small specimen in the Copenhagen Museum is stated by the collector (Capt. Suenson) to have been taken 15 miles off Amoy, but this locality which lies at 241/.°N.L. seems to me for this reason uncertain and perhaps comes from some error. Lastly, on the east coast of America, it has been taken at La- brador, Newfoundland, Gulf of St. Lawrence, Nova Scotia, along the coast of the United States to New Yersey at ca. 40° N. L.; and somewhat out from the coast even to 36° 41’ N.L., 74° 39’ W. L. (M. Rath- bun and S. I. Smith). The literature contains a very large number of single notices as to the depths at which. this species has been taken, and the great majority of these give between 10 and 100 fm, seldom 5 to 10 fm. and sometimes 100o—200 fm. I have found only three statements of greater depths, namely, S.W. of Ireland in 250 fm. (Pocock), 36° 41' N.L., 74° 39’ W. L. in 373 fm. (Smith, 1884) and 41°13'N.L., 66° 1’ W. L. in 906 fm. (Smith, 1884). All these and especially the last are extremely surprising, as the species thus appears to be a true deep-sea form in the Atlantic, but it should be remarked that there is also a further remarkable anomaly, namely, that a little further south at four stations from 41° 10' N. L. to 40° 20'N. off the east coast of America it has been taken in depths of only 41 to 62fm. S. I. Smith is so trustworthy an observer that we cannot doubt his determinations, but so long as there is only this one notice one is inclined until further information is forthcoming to fear greatly that it has arisen through some error or another. According to this distribution, yas coarctatus is essentially a boreal form, which extends to a certain extent into arctic waters but is absent at such purely arctic localities as East Greenland (north of 66° N. B. at least), Jan Mayen, East Spitzbergen and the Kara Sea. It is thus more typically boreal than 4. avaneus, which is also in agreement with the fact that on the east coast of North America it goes much further south than the latter and considerably to the south of Cape Cod; some- times it goes down into greater depths than A araneus. It is very probably not circumpolar; that its circumpolarity is far from being proved needs scarcely be stated. That the “Fauna Arctica” here as so often is defective and misleading may likewise just be mentioned. Remarks. WH. coarctatus is much smaller than the previous species. The largest specimen is a male from West Greenland, locality unknown; the carapace is 99 mm. long, 74 mm. broad, the first pair of legs 156 mm. from the lateral margin of the carapace to the tip (on the underside 171 mm. to the sternum), the second leg 174 mm. from the lateral margin of the carapace to the tip. 7. Portunus holsatus Fabr. 1798. Portunus holsatus J. C. Fabricius, Suppl. Entom. Syst., p. 366. 1844. — — Bell, Brit. Crustacea, p. 109, with fig. 1861. _ — A. Milne-Edwards, Archives du Museum, T. X, 1, p. 393. ! 1863. — — Heller, Crust. siidl. Europa, p. 85. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 17 Occurrence. The “Ingolf? has not taken this species, but it is to hand from other sources. West coast of Iceland: Reykjavik, 1 specimen (taken by Hallgrimsson), and it has been secured a number of times at the Vestmanna Islands and from there eastwards along the south coast of Iceland to ca. 15!/.°W.L. in depths from ro to ca. 60 fm. (A. C. Johansen, “Thor” 1903 and 1904, and “Beskyt- teren”). At the Feeroes it has hitherto been taken only three times, namely, in Kalbaks Fjord, 16—40 fm. (Th. Mortensen); 4 miles east from Naalso, 80 fm. (Th. Mortensen), and 61° 56’ N. L., 7° 04’ W.L., 30 fm. (“Thor” 1903). Distribution. This species is known from the Shetlands and the Hebrides (Norman), further south from the east and west coasts of England and east coasts of Ireland (various authors), north and west coasts of France (Bonnier). It is said also to have been taken in the Mediterranean (Costa, test. Heller) and in the Black Sea (Czerniavsky, test. Ortmann). To this it may be added, that Heller wrote concerning P. marmoreus Yeach: “ist vielleicht bloss eine Varietat” of P. holsatus; A. Milne-Edwards & E. L. Bouvier wrote in 1899: “Si, comme il y a lieu de le croire, le P. marmoreus doit étre identifié avec le P. holsatus Fabricius”, and they show that P. marmoreus is taken at the Azores and state that it “habite depuis le voisinage du littoral jusqu’a 60 m.—1oo m. profondeur”. I am unable to settle the question whether P. marmoreus Leach is only a variety of P. kolsatus Fabr., but mention the statements cited so as to show so far as possible the present state of our knowledge, with special regard to the distri- bution of this species to the south. P. holsatus has also been taken at the coasts of Belgium (v. Beneden), Holland (Herklots, test. Ortmann), off and at the west coast of Jutland (Meinert, Metzger), in the Skager Rak and “northern part of the Kattegat as far as Varberg” (Meinert), at the south coast of Norway (G. O. ‘Sars), lastly Vesteraalen in Lofoten (Nordgaard). The greatest depth I have found given is 70 fm, stated by Meinert (1890). The most northerly place from which the species was formerly taken was the Shetland Isles, between 60 and 61°N.L,.; the statements given above of its occurrence not only at the Feroes but also at the southern coast and the south part of the western coast of Iceland to ca. 64° 10' N. L. mean a not unimportant increase to its distribution, and we have at the same time a new example of how southern forms reach up to these places at Iceland. Remarks. The largest of the above-mentioned specimens came from the south coast of Iceland; its carapace is 34 mm. long and 44'/, mm. broad, which shows that it is indeed adult but not a specially large specimen, as A. Milne-Edwards (1861) gives respectively 40 and 53 mm. as the two dimensions of the carapace. 8. Carcinus Menas L. 1758. Cancer Maenas Linné, Syst. Nature, Ed. X, p. 627. 1844. Carcinus — _ Bell, Brit. Crust, p. 76, with fig. ! 1861. -- — A, Milne-Edwards, Archives du Museum, T. X, p. 391. 1866. — — Heller, Crust. siidl. Europa, p.g1, Taf. II, Fig. 14, 15. Occurrence. This species, which was not taken by the “Ingolf’, is present from the following localities. The Ingolf-Expedition. III. 2. S 18 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. West coast of Iceland: Reykjavik, the shore at ebb-tide; 4 spec. (A. C. Johansen). = - — 2 miles S. E. of Reykjavik, 6 fm. sand and stone; 2 very large spec. (A. C. Johansen). South of Iceland: Vestmanna Islands, in sandeel-net; 1 spec. (A. C. Johansen). Feeroes: two old specimens identified by Kroyer (taken by Nees). — Aadna Fjord, o—r15 fm., (R. Horring). _ Head of Trangisvaag Fjord, o—1 fm.; 1 good-sized spec. (Otterstrom). Distribution. The species is known from the Shetlands and Norman writes that it is “remarkably large” there. A. Milne-Edwards writes in his Monograph (1. c, p. 392): “Cette espéce vit en grand nombre sur les cétes de France et d’Angleterre. On la rencontre sur tout le littoral de la Méditerranée, peut-étre méme jusque dans la mer Rouge. Les Carcins Ménades se trouvent sur les cétes des Etats-Unis d’Amerique. Au nord, ils remontent jusqu’éa la mer Glaciale’. The last two statements however require correction, but I have thought it right to cite what stands in the Mono- graph. According to Gourret’s “Tableaux comparatifs” (p. 44) the species is also found in the Black Sea, at the coast of Portugal and at the Canary Isles, but I do not know the sources from which he takes these data, of which especially the last is of interest. On the east coast of North America the species according to Smith and M. Rathbun is distributed from ca. 43?/,°N.L. to 39'/.° N.L. It occurs on all coasts of the North Sea, goes through the Sound and the Belts into the western Baltic (Meinert, Mobius); on the west coast of Norway it goes to the North Cape (M. Sars, Appelléf), but statements on its occurrence at East Finmark and in the Murman Sea seem to be erroneous (Appelldf). Kingsley (1878) writes: “This species is almost cosmopolitan in its range. It is found on the Eastern Coast of the U. S., from Cape Cod to New Jersey (in 1879 he gives a still more southerly locality, namely, Northampton Co. in Virginia), at Panama, in the Hawaiian Islands, France and Eng- land, in the Baltic and Mediterranean, the Red Sea, Brazil, and, doubtfully, in Australia”. In his work on the Indian Crustacea Alcock states that he has seen a specimen from Ceylon; in 1902 it is noted from Port Phillip, Victoria (teste Calman). This distribution of a coastal form such as Carcinus Menas is extremely interesting; we know indeed some few species of crabs and Stomatopoda which have just as great a distribution in the tropical belts, but none that go so far north. Remarks. In the largest of the above-mentioned specimens from Iceland the carapace is 79 mm. broad and 62 mm. long; the distance between the tips of the second pair of legs is 234 mm. g. Geryon affinis A. M-Edw. & Bouv. Pl. I, figs. ra—1b. 1894. Geryon affinis A. Milne-Edwards & E. L. Bouvier, Rés. des Camp. sc. de I’Hirondelle, fase. VII, p. 41, Pl. I, fig. x. 1904. — — F. Doflein, Brachyura, in Wiss. Ergebn. Deutschen Tiefsee-Exp., B. 6, p. 106, Taf. III, IV, XXXIII, XXXIV, Taf. XXXVIII, Fig. 1-6, Taf XLI, Fig. 3—7, Taf. XLII, Fig. 2 & 8. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 19 Occurrence. The “Ingolf” took this species at the following two stations. S. of Iceland: St. 67: 61° 30’ N. L., 22° 30’ W. L., 975 fm., temp. 3°; 1 female. — — - 65: 61°33’ — 19° of — 1089 — — 3°; 1 male. Distribution. This species was first. taken by the Prince of Monaco at ten stations near the Azores and in depths from 330 to 733fm. These islands lie between 37° and a little below 40°N. L.; the occurrence of G. affinis at 61'/,°N.L. and at much greater depths as indicated above has there- fore considerable interest. Further, it has been taken in the South Atlantic at ca. 25!/,S.L. in a vertical net at 1064 fm. and 498 fm. (Doflein), at the coast of East Africa a little below 3°N.L. in 724 fm. (Doflein) and in the Indian Ocean off the Travancore coast (Alcock). Remarks. A. Milne-Edwards and Bouvier have given a detailed and careful description of this species and remarked on the differences between it and the nearly allied G. guinguedens Smith. The “Ingolf” specimens certainly belong to G. affinis, which is evident amongst other things from the form of the last joint of the walking legs, a character specially noted by the French authors with good reason. These authors have only figured an extremely large specimen; my specimens are rather small, the carapace in the male being only 40 mm., in the female 42 mm. in length, and I have thought it useful to give the outline of the carapace of both specimens so as to show the variation in form and number of processes between these two specimens and between these and the specimen figured by M.-Ed- wards & Bouvier. The female bears thousands of very small eggs, the diameter of which is o5—o6 mm. The Zoéz of a number of eggs were just breaking out or had just broken out. This is of interest as it shows that there is here a normal swimming stage in this deep-water form. to. Geryon tridens Kr. ! 1837. Geryon tridens Kroyer, Naturh. Tidsskr. B.I, p. 10, Tab. 1. 1881. — _ longipes A. Milne-Edwards, Compt. Rend. Acad. Sc. Paris, T. XCIII, p. 879 (teste A. M.-Edw. & Bouvier). !1900., — _ A. Milne-Edwards & E. L. Bouvier, Exp. Scient. du Travailleur et du Talisman, Crust. Déc. I, p. 103, Pl. I, Pl. XVII, figs. 13—21. 1903, — _ Senna, Bull. d. Soc. Entom. Ital, Anno XXXIV, 1902, p. 354. Occurrence. Between the Feroes and Scotland: 59° 28’ N. L., 8° 1’ W. L., 687—580 fm.; 1 spec. (72/3 1902, “Michael Sars”). Distribution. The species was originally founded on a specimen from the south-eastern part of the Kattegat; later, it has been taken in the Skager Rak near the Skaw (Joh. Petersen). In Norway it is not rare in the inner part of Christiania Fjord and has also been taken in one of the fjords at Bergen (G. O. Sars). It is noted from 48° 31’ N. L,, 10° 3'W. L., 690 fm. (Norman), near Valentia, Ireland, in dredging from “85 to 808 fathoms”, lastly from 59° 37'N.L., 7° 19’ W. L., 530 fm., temp. 8°. As G. longipfes has been included as a synonym, the distribution of the species is extended to the following regions: Gulf of Gascogne, at a number of localities with depths from 346 to 617 fm. (Caullery, A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier), the western Mediterranean near the south coast of France, at Sardinia, 3* 20 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. Naples, between Stromboli and Messina, the Adriatic, from 266—372 fm. to 800 fm. (several authors). — We may summarise the data on its bathymetric distribution by saying, that it occurs in depths between 250 and 800 fm.; in the Danish waters isolated specimens are met with at intervals of many years in much smaller depths, certainly even as low as between 20 and 30 fm. Remarks. The specimen taken by the “Michael Sars” is a small female, with carapace 25 mm. long. Comparing this with a female (and a male) of the same size of G. dongifes A. M-Edw. from the Gulf of Gascogne, I have come to the conclusion that there is absolutely no difference between the specimens; then I compared all three with a specimen of G. ¢ridens Kr. from Norway: a male with carapace 53 mm. long, and found that the differences noted by Milne-Edwards & Bouvier between G. tridens and G. longifes do not hold good. Senna came to a somewhat similar result, but the differences in the mouth-parts mentioned by him are also not maintainable and quite worthless as specific characters. I consider it quite certain that G. longipes A. M.-Edw. is only a synonym of the old species of Kroyer. uz. Cymonomus Normani Lankester. Pl. I, figs. 2a—2i. 1904. Cymonomus Normani E. Ray Lankester, Quart. Journ. Micr. Sc. Vol. 47, New. Ser. p. 456, Pl. 33, fig. 1, Pl. 34, figs. 8, 10, 11. Occurrence, There is only one specimen from the “Ingolf” expedition, but later the “Thor” has twice taken this remarkable form. South-West of Iceland: St. 73: 62° 58’ N. L., 23° 28’ W. L., 486 fm., temp. 5°5°; I spec. South of Iceland: 62° 57'N. L., 19° 58’ W. L., 509 fm., “Thor” 14. VII. 1903; 1 spec. South-West of the Feeroes: 61° 15’ N. L., 9° 35’ W. L., 516 fm., “Thor” 22. V. 1904; 1 spec. Distribution. The species was only known previously from two places south-west of the last-named locality, namely, in the warm area south of the “Wyville Thomson Ridge” at ca. 59'/,°N. L. in 542 and 705 fm. Remarks. The species has been described and richly illustrated in the paper mentioned of Lankester. Before this was prepared I had drawn some figures of the single and very defective specimen of the “Ingolf”; a copy, in outline, of one of these figures is introduced in Lankester’s paper (fig. 12 on p. 459) with some remarks. I have thought it of no use to give a detailed de- scription of the species, as the differences between it and the C. granulatus Norm. fully described by A. Milne-Edwards & E. L. Bouvier have been indicated by Lankester. I have however drawn the anterior margin of the carapace and the eye-stalks of all my three specimens in order to show, that there is some variation between them in the reduction of the rostrum, in the form of the eye-stalks and in the size of the lateral corner-processes. In all my specimens the eye-stalks diverge a little from one another at the anterior margin of the head — they are not, as Lankester states, “ammovably united to the margin of the carapace”, as the anterior margin of the carapace is quite free above the skeleton of the head; figs. ro and 11 on Pl. 34 of Lankester’s paper likewise show that there is some distance between the roots of the two eye-stalks, and fig.8 (Pl. 34) must undoubtedly be incorrect in CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 21 this regard. My figures show the slight variation in the curvature, thickness etc. of the eye-stalks, which are all of course without any trace of a cornea; they further show the granular structure correctly, as I have given the granule according to the right number and relative size. The differences in these regards between Lankester’s figures and, mine I ascribe unhesitatively to imperfections in the former, as there is not the least doubt that Lankester’s specimens of C. Normani and mine belong to the same species. On the other hand, Doflein is quite wrong in considering C. Normanz a sub-species of C. granulatus. B. Anomura. 12. Neolithodes Grimaldii A. M.-Edw. & Bouv. ! 1894. Lithodes Grimaldii A. Milne-Edwards & E. L. Bouvier, Rés. Campagnes sc. Hirondelle, fasc. VII, p. 62, Pl. III, figs. 1—6. 1894. _ Goodei Benedict, Proc. U.S. Nat. Museum, Vol. XVII, p. 479. 1896. Neolithodes Grimaldii Bouvier, Ann. Sc. Nat. Zool. Sér. 8, T. I, p. 22 (with complete synonymy). Occurrence. The “Ingolf” has taken this species at 3 stations. : Davis Straits: St. 25: 63° 30’ N. L., 54° 25’ W. L., 582 fm., temp. 3°3°; I gigantic specimen. South of West Iceland: St. 68: 62° 06’ N.L., 22° 30’ W. L., 843 fm., temp. 34°; 1 very small spec. - - _ - 40: 62°00" — 21°36 — 845 — — 33°51 eters tl Distribution. The type specimens of the French authors were taken near Newfoundland in 674 fm. The species has several times been found off the east coast of America, but being con- fused by Smith with Z. Agassizit I am unable to see everywhere which species he had from any given locality, and will therefore restrict myself to saying, that it was taken at any rate at 39'/.° N. L., 411/,° N.L. and at intermediate places off the east coast mentioned in depths from 410 to 1230 fm. Remarks. In the largest specimen from St.25 the carapace, excluding the spine- or process- like rostrum, is 104 mm. long and 91 mm. broad; the fourth thoracic leg 308 mm. from the base of the coxa to the tip. The spines on the thorax must have been for the most part extremely long, but the long ones are all broken; the longest fragment is however 26 mm.; the number and position of the spines agree with the figures in the literature by S. I. Smith and A. Milne-Edwards & E. L. Bouvier, but it should be remarked that there are several short, conical tubercles or small processes more or less close to the margin of the carapace and on the upper surface some low tubercles which must be regarded as rudimentary spines. — In the two small specimens the carapace is respectively ca. 7 and 8 mm., apart from the long process of the rostrum; they are typically developed specimens of NV. Grimaldii, but it should be remarked that in the larger specimen, the carapace has some fairly short to quite short spines chiefly on its posterior half between the long spines and at the margin (almost as Smith’s fig. 2 in Rep. U.S.Comm. Fish and Fisheries for 1885, Pl. III), while in the smaller specimen only the posterior margin and a small part of the lateral margin of the carapace — but not the upper surface — have some short spines between the long. 22 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 13. Lithodes Maja L. 1758. Cancer Maja Linné, Systema Nature, Ed. X,I, p. 629. ! 1853. Lithodes Maja Bell, Brit. Stalk-eyed Crust. p. 165, with fig. ! 1894. — arctica E. L. Bouvier, Ann. Sc. Nat. Zool., Sér. 7, T. XVIII, p. 181, Pl X, fig. 7, Pl. XII, figs. 5a—5b. 1896. _— Maja E. L. Bouvier, Ann. Sc. Nat. Zool., Sér. 8, T. I, p. 24. Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has not brought home this species, but it is to hand from several other sources. Davis Straits: 65° 30’ N. L., 55° 26’ W. L., 289 fm., sand and stones, Wandel 1889; 1 spec. Denmark Straits: off Angmagsalik, at ca. 65° N. L., 140 fm., stones, 2"? Amdrup Exp. 1900; 1 spec. South of Iceland: Vestmanna Islands, District-physician Thorstein Jénsson; 1 large spec. Feeroes: Agent Miiller; 1 spec. Distribution. The species extends from the Shetlands (Norman) and the Orkneys (Bell) southwards, on the west side of Great Britain to the Isle of Man (Bell), in the North Sea to the coasts of Belgium (v. Beneden) and Holland (Hoek). At Denmark it is only found in the more northerly half of the Sound and has been noted by the fishermen from Anholt (Meinert); it is also known from Bohuslan (Goés), along the Norwegian coast to Vadso at Varanger Fjord (M. Sars), lastly on the most western part of the south coast of the Murman Sea, but not in the White Sea (Birula). A single specimen is recorded from 74° 25’ N. L., 17° 36’ E. L., nearly 1oo fm. (Hartlaub, teste Birula); another from West Spitzbergen (Doflein). On the east coast of America it has been taken at Nova Scotia, in the Gulf of Maine and southward to 40°3' N.L. (S. I. Smith); the depths are given as “52 to go” and down to 291 fm. — The species is thus boreal and not arctic (as Doflein states); it has not been taken at any place with temperature below zero. 14. Paralomis spectabilis n. sp. Pl. I, figs 3a—3d; Pl II, figs. ra—1b. Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has taken this large new species at four stations. Between South Greenland and Iceland: St. 92: 64° 44'N. L., 32° 52°W.L., 976fm., temp.1°4°; 2small spec. — — - — - 95:65°14’ — 30°39' — 752 — — 21°;1 good-sized J. -- = - = - 96:65°24' — 29°00! — 735 — — 12°52 — dé and 9. South of Iceland: St. 64: 62° 06’ N. L., 19° oo’ W. L., 1041 fm., temp. 31°; 1 small c Description. In appearance this species shows considerable resemblance to JVeolithodes Agassizii Smith as figured in Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Vol. X, Pl. I, but it is easily distinguished by the development of the antennal squama and the abdomen. Within the genus Paralomis the new species belongs to the division which lacks the protuberance on the under side of the rostrum (see Bouvier’s classification). The carapace, excluding the rostrum, is almost as long as broad; its posterior margin is con- siderably incised in the centre, and an obvious curve is seen on each lateral margin at a distance from the anterior corner of a little less than one-third of its length; the carapace is further provided with ca. 30 long to fairly long spines (including the marginal spines), some smaller spines and numerous CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 23 small tubercles. The rostrum is short and has the usual three smooth processes, the form and direction of which offer nothing of interest. The gastric area is greatly arched, marked posteriorly by a deep cervical furrow from the cardiac area; on the gastric area are 7 very apparent spines, namely, one unpaired long and strong spine in front of the central portion and 3 pairs somewhat shorter but yet good-sized spines out towards the lateral margins, and also some small spines and a number of very small tubercles. Each hepatic region has two long marginal spines, the first of which is on the an- terior corner, as also some small tubercles; the considerably arched cardiac area has 4 good-sized spines. The lateral margin has 4 to 5 good-sized and several smaller spines behind the cervical furrow; along the posterior margin are 4 to 6 somewhat low and also some minute spines. The eye-stalks touch one another at the base; they bear some small tubercles or spines on the upper side. The stalk of the antennz reaches almost to the middle of the last joint of the peduncle of the antennula; its first joint (fig. 3 b) has a short spine on its outer anterior corner; the spine on the front corner of the second joint reaches forward in front of the middle of the squama and at its base the outer margin sometimes has a tubercle. The squama (figs. 3 b, 3c, 3d) has as a rule two processes on the proximal 2/,-ths of its outer margin, the distal one being as a rule fairly long, much longer than the proximal which is short usually but may also at times be longer than the distal or lacking altogether; above on the inner margin, the squama has as a rule a tubercle or short spine near its base and in one of the specimens further a rather long distal spine on the left squama. The flagellum is as long as or even a little longer than the distance from the tip of the longest process of the rostrum to the posterior margin of the cephalothorax. Between the last pair of maxillipeds the sternum has two tufts of bristles but no spines. The first leg on the right is a little longer and considerably thicker than that on the left, the chela especially is much heavier; the meropodite has a single, very long spine on the inner side at the anterior end; the carpus has a similar very long spine on the inner side and on the upper side out towards the lateral margin several fairly long and some shorter spines. The three pairs of walking legs are long with the larger spines placed in rows; the front upper margin of the carpus has 3 long and 3 short or very short spines. The second segment of the abdomen (figs. 1a and rb) has only short or even fairly short, setigerous spines and several small spines or protuberances. No row of protuberances between the median plates of the 3"1—6'* segments. In the large male (fig. 1a) the right lateral plate of the 34 segment has a single, lateral, movable plate, the left none at all; in the small male the right lateral plate of the same segment has two movable lateral plates, the left lateral plate one; in the females (fig. 1 b), there is no movable lateral plate on the right lateral plate of either the third or fourth segment. Measurements. The largest specimen, a female with 1 pair of legs broken off, has the following dimensions. Length of cephalothorax to tip of longest process of rostrum.... 54°5 mm. =_ - _ ~ base :Of, roStruiiinisiuaes “4o5 = = 6; 7 — ~ 120: 07° a9 E038) mo OO ee Be ee - 111: 67° 14'.— 8°48) —. 80 —,. — 005.3 —- - 102: 66°23' — 10°26 — 750 — —=-+00°; 2 — = 103: 66° ag! — BP ga! iH) Sa a eee) eer - 104: 66°23) — 7°25 — 957 — — +1I°; 36 — ~ TOSS O57 3g ate 72 Be nr i Set eee Res - 140: 63°29 — 69577 — 70 — — +099; 2 — CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 67 Further, two specimens were taken by the “Michael Sars” at 63° 3' N. L., 6° 32’ W. L., 975 fm., temp. ++ O°51°. Distribution. The species was founded on specimens from a station between Jan Mayen and Finmark, 1110 fm., temp. + 13°; it was also taken in the stomach of Rhodichthys regina in the same waters in 1280 fm. (G. O. Sars). Ohlin gives it from three localities, one being between Green- land and Jan Mayen, depth 1064 fm., the second near the west coast of Spitzbergen: 76°36’ N.L., 12° 10! E. L., 930 fm., temp. + 13°, the third almost midway between Spitzbergen and East Greenland: 77° 52’ N.L,, 3° 5’ W. L., 1462 fm., temp. + 14°. Birula mentions a single specimen from 79° 41' N.L., 4°58'E. L., 1560 fm., temp.+ 11°. The species has thus been taken at depths from 495 fm. to about 1560 fm. with bottom-temperatures between + 06° and + 14° in the waters between the Feeroes, Iceland, Norway, Spitzbergen and East Greenland with negative bottom-temperature at considerable depths. Remarks. The largest specimens I have are females with eggs from St. 104, 117 and 118, and they measure 87—87°5 mm. From St. 119 there is a female with eggs 81 mm. long, from St. 105 a similar female 735 mm., from St. 125 and 140 two females with eggs 75 mm. long and from the last station a female with eggs only 69 mm. long. Sars gives the length “up to 95 mm.”; I must suppose that he has measured from the tip of the rostrum (not, as suggested by Ohlin, from the end of the antennal scale) to the end of the telson. — The antennal scale varies a little in form with the size of the animal: its terminal margin is less oblique and scarcely so curved in the large speci- mens as in the small, and distally it is a trifle broader in the large than in the small specimens. 61. Bythocaris Payeri Hell. 1875. Hippolyte Payeri Heller', Denksch. d. K Akad. d. Wiss., Math.-naturv. Classe, B. 35, p. 26, Taf. I, Fig. 1—4. 1882. Bythocaris payeri Hoek, Nied. Arch. f. Zool., Supplb. I, Crust. p. 19, Fig. 8—9. ! 1885. _ Payeri G. O. Sars, Den norske Nordhavs-Exp., Crust. I, p. 33, Pl. III, Fig. 27. Occurrence. The “Ingolf? has taken this species at 8 stations. Just as for the previous species, the stations lie in the Northern Ocean, within an area which to the east is bounded by a line from Jan Mayen to the Feeroes and also extends so far to the west as to pass to the north round the north-eastern end of Iceland and southward round East Iceland down to the Feroes. The stations are as follows: St. 116: 70° 05'N.L., 8° 26'W.L., 371 fm., temp. + 04°; great quantity of spec. eg OF BES? gOS, 49S oe ET, 23 “spec. rere if 75? sat agg: SAE eye TE oe = ‘ror: 66°23" — 12° os) 537 i OF: 9g — = '703: 66° 23" — 8°52" — 579 — + 069; g — - 59: 65°00 — 11°16) — 310 — — +O; 1 — eee 730 Oo ee eee Sahn: eg lames Bl Mime Yb ss t The same year the author had published a brief preliminary description without figures in Sitzb. K. Akad. Wissensch. 1. Abth., April-Heft, Jahrg. 1875, 9* 68 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. Further, the species has been taken at 66° 2'N.L,, 11° 5’ W.L., 552—478 fm. (*Thor” 1903). It has never been found at West Greenland; at East Greenland the species has been taken five times between 74° 52'N. L. and 72° 28’N.L,, depths from 95 to 185 fm. (Ohlin). At Jan Mayen it has been taken in 678 fm. (Ohlin). South of the Feroes it has been found at 61° 23' N. L., 4° 21' W. L., 505 fm, temp. ++ 0'4°, 5 specimens (Wandel), and it is given from 60° 3'N. L,, 5°51'W.L., 540 fm. (Norman). Distribution. The species was first taken at Franz Joseph Land, 97 fm. (Heller). It was taken by the Norwegian North-Atlantic Expedition at 9 stations with negative bottom- temperatures and all lying in the waters west of Norway and from there up to the west of Spitz- bergen from 63° 17'N.L. to 79° 59' N. L. (G. O. Sars). The depths varied between 350 fm. and 108x fm. It is also given from 78° 2'N.L,, 9° 25'E.L., 416 fm. with a bottom-temperature of 08° (G. O. Sars), likewise from 79° 58'N.B., 9° 30'E. L., 224 fm. with a bottom-temperature of 1°5° (Ohlin), but both stations lie on the border of the cold area. Lastly, the species has been taken in the eastern part of Barents Sea: 75° 16'N. L., 45° 19' E. L., 160 fm. (Hoek). It appears from the above that the species is found only at depths from ca. 100 fm. to 1080 fm. in the cold area from the Feroe Channel northwards to the northern part of East Greenland, Spitz- bergen, Franz Joseph’s Land and the Barents Sea; it has twice been taken in the neighbourhood of Spitzbergen near the boundary to the area mentioned, in temperatures a little above o°. Remarks. The species stands extremely near to B. gracilis Smith, as is mentioned below, where the differences between the two forms are also dealt with. 62. Bythocaris gracilis S. I Smith. 1885. Bythocaris gracilis S, I. Smith, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., Vol. VII, p. 497. 1886. — — $1 Smith, Rep. Comm. Fish and Fisheries for 1885, p. 658, Pl. XII, figs. 3, 4. Occurrence, This species was taken by the “Ingolf” at three stations: Davis Straits: St. 28: 65° 14’ N. L., 55° 42’ W. L., 420 fm. temp. 3°5°; 3 spec. mi Pee RT OF SA... S51 er BOS ers ae South of West Iceland: St. 67: 61° 30’ N. L., 22° 30' W. L., 975 fm., temp. 3°; 1 spec. Distribution. Previously, only two specimens in all were known from two localities east of North America, namely, about 39'/,°N.L. and 353/,°N.L. in 1043 fm. and 888 fm. temp. 38° and 39° Fahr. Remarks. My specimens must be referred to 2B. gracilis Smith; but the following remarks have to be made. The median dorsal spine on the gastric region occurs in all specimens; in one of them it is certainly very small and it occurs in some specimens of B. Payeri from St. 116, so that its presence in B. gracilis is not a valuable character. The eyes in B. gracilis are but little larger than in B. Payeri; it is necessary however to carefully choose equally large specimens of both species for comparison. The best character between the two seems to be, that the antennal scale is somewhat narrower and a little longer in B. gracilis, but the difference is much smaller than is given in Smith’s description, and in B. Payer’ the scale becomes relatively a little broader with age. Smith’s figure of B. Payert was drawn from a specimen larger than the one which formed the subject for his figure CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 69 of B. gracilis, and it is therefore to a certain extent misleading. Further, there is also some difference in the form of the scale in my specimens of 2. gracilis: in the specimen from St. 67 the part beyond the spine on the outer margin is more prolonged, the scale itself relatively longer and with almost parallel margins; the specimen thus differs in the form of the scale more from 2. Payert than is the case with the specimens from the Davis Straits, in which the margins of the scale diverge forwards. — The differences between B. Payert and B. gracilis are thus very small, but as the differences exist the species should be maintained, at any rate until further knowledge of the variation and geographical distribution has been obtained. 63. Bythocaris simplicirostris G. O. Sars. 1870. Bythocaris simplicirostris G. O. Sars, Vid. Selsk. Forh. Christiania, f. 1869, p. 149. ! 1874. Hippolyte Panschii Buchholz, Zweite Deutsche Nordpolarfahrt, B. II, p. 277, Taf. I, Fig. 1. 1894. Bythocaris simplicirostris Norman, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 6, Vol. XIII, p. 270, Pl. XII, fig. 1. 1897. — — Birula, L’Annuaire du Mus. Zool. de Acad. Imp. de St.-Pétersbourg, 1897, p- 427, Tab. XX, Fig. 3. IgOl. — -- Ohlin, Bih. till K. Svenska Vet.-Akad. Handl., B. 27, Afd. IX, no. 8, p. 39, Fig. 1. Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has only taken this species at one station. South-East of Iceland: St. 4: 64°7'N.L., 11° 12’ W. L., 237 fm., temp. 2°5°; 1 spec. The species is described under the name Aippolyte Panschit by Buchholz from a specimen taken in 30 fm. at Nordshannon, which lies in ca. 75°N.L. on East Greenland; I have seen an East Greenland specimen from ca. 74'/,°N.L., near Pendulum Islands, 110 fm. (24 Amdrup Exped.), and a specimen was taken in 133 fm. a little more to the south, namely, off Kaiser Franz Joseph Fjord (Ohlin). Lastly, I have seen a specimen taken a little east of the south end of the Feeroes: 61°23'N.L,, 5° 04’ W. L., 255 fm., temp. 0° (Wandel). Distribution. Sars founded &. stmplicirostris (see Remarks) on a specimen taken at Skraaven (Lofoten) in 250 fm.; later, it was taken by the same author at 72° 27'N.L,, 20° 51'E.L., 191 fm.. temp. 35° and at 78°2'N.L., 9° 25'E.L., 416 fm., temp. 08°; Metzger notes it from Mandal, 60 fm., Norman from Trondhjem Fjord, 250—300 fm., Nordgaard from Trano Deep, 322—340 fm., and from Malangen (ca. 69'/,° N. L,.), ca. 50—100 fm. Lastly, it is given from the western part of the Murman Sea (Birula). Remarks. I have referred my specimens to 2B. stmplicirostris and included B. Panschii as a synonym. If the former is incorrect, I venture to think with a considerable degree of certainty, that Ohlin’s specimen from East Greenland and G. O. Sars’ specimens from ca. 72'/,° and 78°N.L. have also been incorrectly determined, as all these have undoubtedly belonged to 2. Panschit. The question is therefore, whether this species is identical with 2B. stmplicirostris or not. It cannot be settled with certainty from the available descriptions, but both the distribution and Sars’ own reference of his specimens from the Norwegian North-Atlantic Expedition to the species from Lofoten speak strongly in favour of it. Sars certainly writes: “Oculi minimi subcylindrici, pigmento pallide fulvescente”, and this seems to tell strongly against my determination (unfortunately, neither Sars nor Ohlin refer later 70 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA, to the point), but Norman — who captured two specimens in the Trondhjem Fjord, says: “Eyes well developed, on long peduncles, when laterally projected extending beyond the sides of the carapace”, and my three specimens show extremely peculiar differences with regard to the eyes. In the “Ingolf” specimen the one eye preserved is grey-brown, but it is black in the two other specimens; the speci- meu from East Greenland is a female with eggs, the eye-stalks are cylindrical in almost their whole length and scarcely thinner than the diameter of the eye; the latter in this specimen is not only relatively considerably smaller but almost absolutely smaller than in the two other considerably smaller specimens, but in both of these the eye itself is obviously broader than the stalk and the latter is strongly conical in the specimen from the Feroes. Whether all this variation indicates anything or not, in other words, whether there should be two (or three) species extremely closely related or only a single species, variable with respect to the eyes, neither my small and far from perfect material nor the literature can give any final decision. But I am greatly inclined to consider, that not only my own specimens but also those mentioned by earlier authors of B. simplicirostris and B. Panschit belong to the same species. 64. Caridion Gordoni Bate. ? Hippolyte Gordoni Bate, Nat-Hist. Review, V, p. 51 [test. Norman]. 1861. Doryphorus — Norman, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 3, Vol. VIII, p. 277, Pl. XIII, figs. 6 & 7. 1863. Caridion — Goés, Ofv. K. Svenska Vet-Akad. Férhandl., 20 Arg., p. 170. Occurrence. This species has not been taken by the “Ingolf’. It has only been found twice by the “Thor” within the area dealt with in this work. South-West of Iceland: West of Geirfugleskeer, many small spec. and larvee. South of West Iceland: 63° 15’ N. L., 22° 23' W. L., 114—173 fm.; many spec. Distribution. The species is known from the Shetlands and the Hebrides (Norman), Scot- land (Norman), the Irish Sea (Walker), North Sea: 48 miles W. of Blaavandshuk, 22 fm. (Metzger); also from Bohuslén on the west coast of Sweden, ro—15 fm. (Goés); lastly, from several places on the south and west coast of Norway, especially in the region of the deep-sea corals, and Varanger Fjord on the east coast of Finmark (G. O. Sars). When Sars writes on the basis of the last find: “it seems from this that the present form must be regarded as a northerly, perhaps even an arctic form”, it must be said that its distribution shows that it is certainly not arctic. Further, it has also been taken at a number of places on the east coast of the United States from Fundy Bay to Cape Cod, in depths between 27 and 110 fm., but not in the Gulf of St. Lawrence (S. I. Smith). 65. Pandalus borealis Kr. 1838. Pandalus borealis Kroyer, Naturh. Tidsskr. 2. B., p. 254. 1845. _ — Naturh. Tidsskr, Ny R., 1. B, p. 461. 1846. — — — Voy. en Scand., Crust. Pl. 6, figs. 2, a—o. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” has taken this species at 10 localities. Davis Straits: St. 31: 66° 35’ N. L., 55° 54’ W. L., 88 fm., temp. 1°6°; 5 spec. — — - 29: 65°34 — 54°31' — 68 — — 02°38 — CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 71 Davis Straits: Ameragdla, head of Ameralik Fjord at Godthaab; 1 spec. East of South Greenland: St. 94: 64°56’ N.L., 36° 19' W.L., 204 fm., temp. 41°; 1 spec. North-West of Iceland: St. 129: 66°35’ — 23°47) — 117 — — 65°; 12 — North of Iceland: St. 128: 66° 50’ N. L., 20° 02’ W. L., 194 fm., temp. 06°; 12 spec. —_- - os - 126: 67°19' — 15°52) — 293 — — -+0'5°; 14 spec. — - - - 124: 67°40! — 15°40° — 495 —' — +069; 1 — East of Iceland: St. 59: 65° 00’ N. L,, 11° 16’ W. L., 310 fm., temp. + 01°; 2 spec. North-West of the Feeroes: St. 2: 63° 04’ N. L, 9° 22' W. L., 262 fm., temp. 5°3°; 1 spec. According to the Malac. Groenl. the species is very abundant from Umanak, ca. 70° 42’ N. L,, southwards along the west coast of Greenland, in depths from 75 to 265 fm.; two of a number of later finds in the same waters were in shallower water, but it has also twice been taken near 651/, N. L. in depths such as 289 fm. and 349 fm., temp. 4°5° and 3'2° respectively. It has been taken further in the fjords along the north-west, north and east coasts of Iceland (Dyre Fjord, Patrik Fjord, Arnar Fjord, Skagestrand Bay, Skdlfandi, Mid Fjord, Seydis Fjord, Rode Fjord, Faskrud Fjord) and is common more or less to sea off the same coastal regions in depths from 18—1g fm. to 287 fm.; on the other hand I know it from only two localities off the west or south coast of Iceland, namely, 63° 46'N. L., 22° 56’ W. L., 79 fm. (“Thor” 1903) and 63!/,N.L., 17°31'W.L., 92 fm. temp. 7° (Wandel); it has not been taken at the Feroes. At East Greenland it has only been taken off Angmagsalik (65° 37'N. L.), 140 fm. (2"4 Amdrup Exped.), thus far to the south-west of the ridge across the Denmark Straits. Distribution. The species occurs in the Skager Rak (Joh. Petersen), at Bohuslan (Goés) and up in the Christiania Fjord, sometimes in great depths on the west and south coasts of Norway (G. O. Sars), in the fjords of Finmark (G. O. Sars), from there to Bear Island and Spitzbergen, where it occurs nearly everywhere with exception of north and east of the most northern island, and goes northward to 81° 14’ N. L. in depths from ca. 50 to 260 fm. and in temperatures “most frequently above o° (G. O. Sars, Ohlin, Doflein, Birula); lastly, a little south of Franz Joseph Land, 140 fm. (Heller). It is also found in the western and northern parts of the Murman Sea (Birula) and in the Barents Sea (Hoek); two specimens brought home by the “Dijmphna” were taken in the Kara Sea in 49 and 100 fm. (Hansen). — On the east coast of America it has been taken from Massachusetts Bay to Nova Scotia, 40 to 160 fm. (S. I. Smith, M. Rathbun). It is noted from the Sea of Ochotsk and Unaljaschka (Wosnesenski); and on the west coast of North America it is found in the Bering Sea and in the Pacific southward to 46° N. L., 29'/,—350 fm. (Mary Rathbun). _ The species is never littoral, it is met with in fjords in depths from scarcely 20 to 60 fm., but outside these usually in 80 to 300 fm.; it has been taken a single time in 495 fm. It is usually found in positive bottom-temperatures, but it appears especially from the “Ingolf’s” results and Birula’s statements (1907) that it can also occur in cold water, down to +1°8°. It is obviously rare in the Kara Sea, though I believe that the two localities from this sea are correctly given by me (they occurred thus in the collection); that it has not been taken at northern East Greenland shows how- ever, that it is scarcely so marked an arctic form as various other decapods (Ohlin expresses the opinion that it probably “ought not to be regarded as a true Arctic form, but rather as a North Atlantic (and North Pacific) species”, but this view is somewhat exaggerated). 72 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 66. Pandalus Montagui Leach. 1814. Pandalus Montagui Leach, Edinburgh Encyclopzedia, VII, p. 432 [teste Calman]. 1845. — annulicornis Kroyer, Naturh. Tidsskr., Ny R., 1. B,, p. 469. 1846. — — Kroyer, Voy. en Scand., Crust. Pl. 6, figs. 3 a—e. ! 1899. -- Montagui Calman, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 7, Vol. III, p. 30, Pls. I—IV, fig. 1. g 7 p-'3 Occurrence. The “Ingolf” has taken this species at four stations. Baffin Bay: St. 33: 67° 57’N. L., 55° 30’ W. L., 35 fm., temp. 08°; 19 spec. North-West of Iceland: St. 129: 66° 35’ N. L., 23° 47' W. L., 117 fm., temp. 6°5°; 1 spec. North of Iceland: St. 127: 66° 33’ N. L., 20° 05’ W. L., 44 fm., temp. 5°6°; 13 spec. South of East Iceland: St. 51: 64° 15’ N. L., 14° 22’ W. L., 68 fm., temp. 7°3°; I spec. According to the data in Malac. Groenl., later finds and a statement by Ohlin, the species is not rare along the west coast of Greenland in the region from Godhavn at 69° 14’ N. L. to Godthaab, 64° 11'N.L., in depths from 4 to 40 fm.; it has never been found on the east coast of Greenland nor at Jan Mayen. The species is common all round the coasts of Iceland (for example, it has been taken at Skagi, Stykkisholm, in Patrik Fjord, Dyre Fjord, @nundar Fjord, Ofjord, Seydis Fjord, Faskrud Fjord etc.) in depths from 3—4 fm. to 80 fm.; it is likewise very common at the Feroes from 1—3 fm. to 60 fm. Distribution. The species is common along the whole coast of Great Britain (Calman), and has been taken at the Channel Islands (Norman), in Holland (Hoek), on the eastern side of the North Sea, in the Skager Rak and Kattegat, from there some distance into the Sound, within the Belts (Meinert) and in the most western part of the Baltic, in Kiel Bay and Eckernférde Bay (Mébius); also, along the whole coast of Norway (M. Sars); (Nordgaard notes it from a number of Norwegian fjords and from depths of ca. ro to 160 fm.), on the coast of the western part of the Murman Sea and in the White Sea (Birula). On the east coast of America the species is found at Labrador, in the St. Lawrence, at Nova Scotia and goes further south past Cape Cod to 41° 25'N.L., usually in depths between ro and 70 fm. (S. I. Smith). A form or variety, P. Montagui tridens M. Rathbun, is common along the west side of North America from the Bering Sea to 39°N. L., 3—351 fm. (Mary Rathbun). This species is common in England in “tide-pools” and the greatest certain depths for it are 116 fm. (“Ingolf” St. 129) and 121 fm.(Rathbun), Smith’s statement (Trans. Conn. Acad. Vol. V) of a single occurrence in 430 fm. having to be regarded with some doubt until a trustworthy, new, similar ob- servation has been made in the Atlantic. Remarks. The largest specimen I have seen measures 105 mm. from the tip of the rostrum to the end of the telson; it was taken at 65° 18’ N. L., 53° 21’W. L., 65 fm., temp. 1° (Wandel). 67. Pandalus propinquus G. O. Sars. 1870. Pandalus propinquus G. O. Sars, Forh. Vid. Selsk. Christiania f. 1869, p. 148. 1886, = — S. I. Smith, Rep. U.S. Comm. Fish and Fisheries for 1885, Pl. XIII, fig. 1. ! 1899. — _ Calman, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 7, Vol. III, p. 32, Pls. I—IV, fig. 2. Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has taken this species at 18 stations. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 73 Davis Straits: St. 32: 66° 35'N. L., 56° 38’ W. L., 318 fm., temp. 3°9°; I spec. — — - 35: 65°16) — 55°05) — 362 — — 36°31 — te eg Ok BA GS Re em ae ot SSS oe arncen ees Oy aS o>: Sera et 39 8 West of Iceland: St. go: 64° 45'N. L., 29° 06’ W. L., 568 fm., temp. 4-4°; 2 spec. - - _ - 89: 64° 455 — 27°20' — 310 — — 84°; 2 — ee eet Gray 1S 2s: arene ae oe S83 South-West of Iceland: St. 85: 63° 21'N. L., 25° 21’ W. L., 170 fm., temp. ? ; 1 spec. ~ - — - 83: 62°25) — 28°30 — 912 — — 35°51 — — - — - 81: 61°44" — 27°00! — 485 — — 61°31 — _ - — - 78: 60°37, — 27°52’ — 799 — — 4'5°; numerous spec. South of Iceland: St. 64: 62° 06’ N. L., 19° 00’ W. L., 1041 fm., temp. 3°1°; 3 spec. oe — - 65: 61° 33, — 19°00' — 1089 — — 30°; 1 — ese! GES OR ae TRE Ae aa een ek 310° ee ee SROs Eg IS ss ey ee ee Oe 38st ee eS 49 G7 Oa 97 ot 1g eee ee 34°53 West of the Feeroes: St. 47: 61° 32'N. L., 13° 40’ W. L., 950 fm., temp. 3:2°; I spec. a ES ae - 46: 61° 32" — 11°36’ — 720 — — 24°32 — Within the region where it was. taken by the “Ingolf” it has also been found several times by Wandel and the “Thor”. Distribution. It has been taken twice in the lochs on the west coast of Scotland, at one of these places in 4o fm. (Calman), at several places on the west coast of Norway in 80 to 300 fm. (G. O. Sars), and it goes up to Malangen, ca. 69'/, N.L. (Nordgaard); lastly, it has been taken a number of times on the east coast of New England, as far south as 39'/;N.L,., in 116 to 640 fm. (Smith, M. Rathbun). According to the data above it goes with the warm Atlantic water up into Davis Straits at least to 66°35’N.L., and is common in the deep water down to 1089 fm. in the waters west and south of Iceland. The bottom-temperature is usually over 3°, a single time 2°4°. Remarks. For this as for the foregoing and the two following species reference may be made to Calman’s careful descriptions. I shall only remark on a single point. Calman says that the carpus of the second right leg is divided by 4 articulations, that is, into 5 joints; Sars gives 6. Cal- man’s number is by far the most common, but it may still be somewhat higher; on an extremely characteristic specimen from St. 54 I found 7 distinct articulations; the proximal joint further was divided into two weak articulations only seen in a certain light, so that the carpus in this case had really ro joints. — None of my specimens attain the length given by Sars and Smith. 68. Pandalus Bonnieri Caull. 1882. Pandalus leptorhynchus G. O. Sars, Vid.Selsk. Forh. Christiania for 1882, No. 18, p. 47, Tab. I, Fig.8—ro. 1896. Dichelopandalus Bonnieri Caullery, Ann. Univ. Lyon, 1896, p. 379, Pl. XV, Fig. 7—15. ! 1899. Pandalus Bonnieri Calman, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. Sec. 7, Vol. III, p. 34, Pls. I—IV, fig. 3. The Ingolf-Expedition. III. 2. Io 74. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. Occurrence. The “Ingolf”? has not found this species, but in 1903 it was twice taken by the “Thor” a little to the south of Iceland: namely: 63° 15’ N. L., 22° 23' W.L., 114—173 fm. and 63° 16’ N.L,, 19° 57'W. L., 137—207 fm. Distribution. Calman gives the species from two lochs on the west coast of Scotland, from Rockall and off the south-west coast of Ireland. The depths were from 4o to 214 fm. Caullery gives it from the Bay of Gascony in depths from 95 to 638 fm. Sars and Appelléf notes it from Drobak in Christiania Fjord, from Bergen, Sogne Fjord and Aalesund, thus up to ca.62'/, N. L., depths 60—230 fm.; further, it is given from Salten Fjord ca. 67'/, N.L., 170—200 fm. (Nordgaard); I have seen one specimen taken to the west of the most southern part of Norway: 58° 32'N.L,, 4° 18’ E. L, 149 fm. (Joh. Schmidt), 69. Pandalina brevirostris Rathke. 1843. Pandalus brevirostris Rathke, Nova Acta Ac. Cees. Leop.-Car., Tab. XX, p. 17. 1863. _ _ Heller, Crust. siidl. Eur. p. 247, Taf. VIII, Fig. 9. 19828 — — Hoek, Nied. Arch. fiir Zool., Supplb. I, Crust. p. 22, Taf. I, Fig. ro. ! 1899. Pandalina oe Calman, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist. Sec. 7, Vol. III, p. 37, Pls. I—IV, fig. 4. Occurrence. It has not been taken by the “Ingolf’. I have only seen a single specimen, taken at Trangisvaag in the most southern part of the Feeroes, 8—9g'/, fm. (Dr. F. Jorgensen). Distribution. The species is common at Shetland (Norman), is met with all round the coasts of Great Britain (Calman), and is found on the northern and north-western coasts of France (Bonnier). It has several times been taken in the Mediterranean, thus at the Cyclades (Adensamer), in the Adriatic Sea at several places (Heller, Adensamer), on the east coast of Sardinia (Senna), the depth varying from 16 to 235 fm.; according to Senna the “Travailleur” has taken it (in the Mediterranean ?) at 566 fm. In northern seas it has been taken at the coast of Holland, 10 fm. (Hoek), also in the Kattegat and in the northernmost part of the Sound in depths from 1o'/, to 26 fm. (Meinert), at Bohuslan (Goés), along the coast of Norway to Malangen, 69° 33'N. L. (Nordgaard); it has not been mentioned from East Finmark by Norman nor by Birula from the Murman Sea. Nordgaard gives numerous localities on the west coast of Norway, but most of the depths are from 100 to 200 fm., in a single case even over 300 fm., which makes me think that the species has perhaps not come into the fishing apparatus at the very bottom. Hoek (l.c.) gives it from 74° 16'N.L., 29° 47’ E.L., 192 fm.; this find is extremely interesting and may be considered correct, it seems to me, as the possibility of an error in determination appears excluded, and we can hardly have doubts as to the locality; according to the chart in the “Norwegian North-Atlantic Expedition” this locality lies within the area with bottom-temperatures over 0°. 7o. Nematocarcinus exilis Bate. 1888. Stochasmus exilis Bate, Rep. Challenger Vol. XXIV, p. 823, Pl. CXXXII, fig. 14. ! 1896. Nematocarcinus exilis Calman, Trans. Roy. Irish Acad. Vol. XXXI, Part I, p. 6. Occurrence. The “Ingolf”’ has taken this species at 7 stations. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 75 South-West of Iceland: St. 74: 62° 17'N. L., 24° 36’ W. L., 695 fm., temp. 4°2°; 1 spec. South of Iceland: St. 68: 62° 06'N. L., 22° 30’ W. L., 843 fm., temp. 34°; 2 spec. — - _ - 67: 61°30' — 22°30' — 975 — — _ 3°0°; fragments. — s = - 40: 62°00 — 21°36' — 845 — — _ 3°3°; IO spec. a - 66: 61° 33’ — 20°43) — 1128 — — 33°35 1 — Sri — = 63: 62° 40° = 19°05 — 800°— — 40°; I — ee res AYP OL Jal s HAIMA Ps Geet 38°) Distribution. Sp. Bate’s single specimen was taken in the neighbourhood of the Canary Isles. Many specimens were taken south-west of Ireland, 750 fm. (Calman). According to the above it is a purely deep-water form from the Atlantic; it has without doubt a much greater geographical distribution than as yet known. Remarks. My specimens agree with Calman’s remarks; further, before I read this author, I had considered them to belong to Bate’s species. It differs from MV. exsiferus Bate in the shorter rostrum, the length of which is between that in WV. ensiferus and N. cursor A. M.-Edw.; it also differs from NV. ensiferus in that the eyes seem a little larger; further, the posterior corner of the fifth abdominal segment is less drawn out though it ends in a very small or rudimentary spine; lastly, the third abdominal segment is dorsally less produced than in NM. ensiferus. 71. Acanthephyra purpurea A. Milne-Edw.' 1881. Acanthephyra purpurea A. Milne-Edwards, Comp. Rend. Ac. Se. Paris, T. XCIII, p. 933. ! 1882. Miersia Agassizii S. I. Smith, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. X, p. 67, Pl. XI, figs. 5—7, Pl. XII, figs. 1—4. 1884. Acanthephyra Agassizii S. I. Smith, Rep. U.S. Comm. Fish & Fishery for 1882, p. 372, Pl. VIII, fig. 1. 1886, - os S. I. Smith, Rep. U. S. Comm. Fish & Fishery for 1885, p. 667, Pl. XV, ; figs. 1, 6, 6a. 7; Pl. XIV, fig. 2. 1888. — purpurea Sp. Bate, Rep. Challenger, Vol. XXIV, p. 733, Pl. CXXIV, fig. 3. Occurrence. The species has been taken by the “Ingolf” at 6 stations. Davis Straits: St. 25: 63° 30'N. L., 54° 25’ W. L., 582 fm., temp. 3°3°; 1 spec. West of Iceland: St. 12: 64° 38’ N. L., 32° 37’ W. L., 1040 fm., temp. 0°3°; I spec. —-- = - 11: 64°34" — 31°12’ — 1300 — — 1651 — = Jeena - ot: 64°44’ — 31 South-West of Iceland: St. 17: 62° 49' N. L., 26° 58’ W. L., 745 fm., temp. 3°4°; I spec. South of Iceland: St. 69: 62° go’ N. L., 22° 17' W. L., 589 fm., temp. 39°; I spec. Further, it has been taken at 62° 11'N. L., 19° 36’W. L., 1o0oo—1100 fm. (“Thor”) and south-west of the Feroes at 59° 28'N.L., 8° 1'W.L., 687 fm. (Bergen Museum). In 1904 it was taken by the “Thor” at the following places: ° es o — 1236 — — 31°51 — t After the text on this species was written I received Stanley W. Kemp’s very elaborate study on Acanthephyra in “Fisheries, Ireland, Sci. Invest. 1905, I., [1906]’. The author spends more than twelve pages on A. purpurea, giving the dreadful synonymy and numerous new details on its characters, variation, distribution, etc. Instead of adding to my own text, I have preferred to refer readers to Mr. Kemp’s paper. to* 76 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. West of North Iceland: 65° 00’N.L,, 28° 10’ W. L., young-fish trawl, 1000 m. wire out, depth of the sea 1240 m.}; 2 spec. South of Iceland: 61° 34'N.L,, 19°05’ W.L., young-fish trawl, 1800 m. wire out, depth of the sea 2160 m.; 4 spec. South of Iceland: 61°30'N. L., 17°08’ W.L,., young-fish trawl, 1800 m. wire out, depth of the sea ? m.; 8 small spec. South of Iceland: 62° 47'N.L., 15°03’ W.L., young-fish trawl, 1500 m. wire out, depth of the sea 1950 m.; I spec. Distribution. On the European side of the Atlantic, this species has been taken in the Bay of Gascony, 425 fm. (Caullery), off Portugal, 1378 fm. (A. Milne-Edwards), south-west of the Azores, 1675 fm. and at the Canary Isles, 1675 fm. (Sp. Bate), also south of the Cape Verde Isles at 2128 fm. and in the vertical net from o to 213 fm. (Ortmann). In the Mediterranean it has been taken at Mes- sina (Riggio) and near Monaco, at the last place in a large net sunk to a little over 1000 fm. (Lo Bianco). It has also been taken northwest of the Bermudas, 2675 fm. (Sp. Bate) and at a number of places off the east coast of America between 31°41‘N.L. and 42°2'N.L,, the depths varying from 105 to 2949 fm. (S. I. Smith), But Smith writes further (Rep. Comm. Fish... for 1885, p. 63), that a single specimen was taken “at the surface in a dip-net, and was kept alive for half an hour”. This and another reason given induced Smith to write: “These facts lead me to suppose that this species is not a habitual inhabitant of the bottom at great depths, but more probably a truly free-swimming inhabitant of some part of the vast region intermediate between the surface and the bottom, such a one as might occasionally stray to the surface or to considerable depths”. The observations mentioned by Ortmann and Lo Bianco of specimens taken in the vertical net agree with this. To judge from the structure of the animal and from the 4 catches made by the “Thor” in 1904, Smith’s supposition seems quite justified. Whether the specimens referred by Faxon (Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool. XVIII, p. 161) with a query to A. Agassizii really belong to this species, I am unable to determine; they came from the Pacific in the Gulf of Panama and somewhat further south. Remarks. It is perhaps right to add that the specimens investigated by me certainly belong to the A. Agassizii so well described and figured by Smith; in referring it as synonym to A. purpurea I have only followed the authors. — At the time of capture of the specimens taken by the “Ingolf” at St. 11 and St. 12 it was noted: “animals clear, blood-red all over, eyes black”. 72. Acanthephyra gracilis S. I. Smith. ! 1882. Miersia gracilis S.I. Smith, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Vol. X, p. 70, Pl. XI, figs. 4—4d; Pl. XII, fig. ro. 1886. — — §.L Smith, Rep. Comm. Fish and Fisher. for 1885, p. 672. Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has not taken this species but it was brought home in 1904 by the “Thor” from the following locality. South of Iceland: 62° 47'N.L,., 15°03'W. L., 1950 m., young-fish trawl, 1500 m. wire out; I spec. Distribution. The species was founded on a specimen taken off the east coast of America CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 77 at 34° 28’ 25” N.L., 75° 22'50” W.L., 1632 fm.; later, a specimen was taken somewhat more to the north, namely, 36°05'5'N.1L,., of the same coast at 2512 fm. In 1905 a number of specimens were captured by the “Thor” in the young-fish trawl at two stations respectively west of the Channel and west of Brittany. The species is a bottom form certainly just as little as A. purpurea. The length of the wire out was in five catches respectively 1800, goo, 300, 300 and 200 m.; with 200 m. out only quite small specimens were taken, while the two largest specimens were taken with 1800 and goo m., and with 900 m. both large and rather small specimens were taken. Remarks. In his above mentioned paper Stanley Kemp refers A. gracilis Smith as a synonym to A. debilis A. M-~Edw. Not having seen the French author’s figure I have no opinion on the question. My specimens agree well with the description and figure given by Smith, but not so well with Kemp’s description and figures of A. dedilis. The lateral plates of the fifth abdominal segment have their posterior margin less convex than in Kemp’s fig. 4 and possess nearly always the marginal tooth pointed out by Smith. Further, the telson has several dorsal pairs of spines in front of the large pair, and the terminal part beyond the last pair of spines is considerably longer than shown by Kemp. Finally, I cannot see any vestige of the luminous organs described by Kemp. For these reasons I must leave the question of synonymy to future investigators. 73. Acanthephyra Batei Faxon. Pl. IV, fig. 2a (named A. brevirostris). 1888. Acanthephyra brevirostris Sp. Bate, Rep. Challenger, Vol. XXIV, p. 751, Pl. CXXVI, figs. 5—6. 1897. _ batei, Faxon, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool., Vol. XVIII, p. 167. Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has not found this species but it was brought home in 1904 by the “Thor” from the following locality. South of Iceland: 61° 30’ N.L., 17°08’ W.L., young-fish trawl, 1800 m. wire out; I spec. Distribution. The species was founded on two specimens taken in the Atlantic at 1° 22’N.L,, 26° 36' W. L., 1500 fm. No other specimens are mentioned in the literature. The species is certainly not a bottom form; the specimen examined by me can scarcely have been in greater depths than ca. 400 fm., so that it was living pelagically in the intermediate layers. Remarks. The “Thor” specimen is 60 mm. long. The carapace is greenish, lighter or darker chiefly according to the colour of the tissues underneath. The dorsal aspect of the first three ab- dominal segments is gray-green, the lateral surfaces much lighter. The carapace is furnished with a high, sharp keel along the whole length of the median line; the front part of this keel and the rostrum together with 10 dorsal spines, the rostrum which is somewhat bent upwards with 1 spine, at the middle of the lower margin; the rostrum is more strongly bent upwards that Bate’s fig. 5 shows. The lateral keel of the carapace begins a little behind the orbital margin, continues right to the posterior margin and is very obvious. The first and second abdominal segments have no dorsal keel, the four following have a sharp dorsal ridge along their whole length and on the 4" to the 6 the ridge runs out into a fairly small spine. The telson has 3 small spines on the sharp distal section of each of the two ridges; the truncated end has 5 spines, of which the lateral pair are long, the three others 78 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. fairly short. — There is no doubt that the specimen belongs to A. brevirostris; there was no reason for Bate to consider the one of his two specimens as a variety. 74. Pasiphaé tarda Kr. ! 1845. Pasiphaé tarda Kroyer, Naturhist. Tidsskr. Ny R., 1.B, p. 434. 1846. — — Kroyer, Voy. en Scand., Crust, Pl. I, A. B.a—o. ! 1868. — norvegica M. Sars, Nyt Mag. for Naturv. B. 15, p.282, Pl. I-—V, Fig.65—86; P1.V, Fig.81,87—9o. Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has taken this species at 5 stations. Davis Straits: St. 28: 65° 14'N.L., 55°42'W.L., 420 fm., temp. 3°5°; fragments of 3 spec. West of Iceland: St. 97: 65° 28 N. L., 27° 39'W. L., 450 fm., temp. 5°5°; I spec. South-West of Iceland: St. 81: 61° 44'N.L., 27°00’ W.L., 485 fm., temp. 61°; I spec. North of East Iceland: - 126: 67°19 — 15°52' — 293 — — -+0'5°; I spec. South of Jan Mayen: - 116: 70°05) — 8°26'5 — 371 — ~— +0493 4 — Kroyer founded the species on two specimens from the southernmost part of West Greenland. In 1904 it was taken by the “Thor” at no fewer than 9 localities, namely, at 3 places west of Iceland from 65° to ca. 65'/,°N.L., 27° 10' to 28° 10'W.L,., young-fish trawl, 740, 763 and 1240 meters wire out; north of east Iceland at 67°19'N.L., 17°55’W.L., young-fish trawl, 800 meters wire out; at 3 places south of Iceland, young-fish trawl, 100, 800 and 1800 meters wire out; lastly, twice south-west of the Feeroes, young-fish trawl, 820 and 900 meters wire out; a number of specimens were taken south-west of the Feeroes, at 61° 7'N. L., 9° 33' W. L., 425—460 fm., by the “Michael Sars”. Ortmann mentions one specimen taken in the vertical net, o—600 meters, not far from the “Ingolf” station 81. Distribution. In the North Sea one specimen has been taken off northern Jutland on the surface (Meinert); in the Skager Rak it is fairly common pelagically in deeper layers (“Thor”); it occurs along the south and west coasts of Norway from Christiania Fjord “at any rate to Lofoten” (G. O. Sars), it has later been taken even at Malangen, 69° 33' N. L. (Nordgaard). It has also been taken in the Norwegian Sea far to the west of Norway at 3 stations with very great depths and bottom-temperatures from - 11° to + 13° (G. O. Sars), lastly in the vertical net at 3 places from 73° to 73'/.°N.L., 2° to 2° 50'W. L. (Ohlin). S. I. Smith has seen specimens from places off the east coast of America, Massachusetts, where it goes no further south than Cape Cod. Lo Bianco states that he has seen specimens from a number of localities in the Mediterranean off the west coast of Italy, but some of his determinations of Crustacea are not trustworthy. The species is pelagic as supposed by Sars; it lives often, perhaps as a rule, in depths from 150 to 300 fm. but can also swim much nearer the surface and apparently goes still deeper down sometimes. I think however that it always keeps to water-layers with temperature above 0°; this agrees with the “Ingolf” stations 28, 97 and 81, with almost all the “Thor” localities and a number of the others. In the Norwegian Sea it goes in my opinion with the warm surface-current towards the north and north-west, but does not go down into the lower layers with temperatures below o°. Remarks. The largest of the specimens taken by the “Ingolf’, from St. 116, is 96 mm. long; a female with eggs came from 61° 7’ N. L., 9° 33’ W. L. (Bergen Museum) and measured 143 mm. from tip of rostrum to end of telson. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 79 75. Parapasiphaé sulcatifrons S. I. Smith. 1884. Parapasiphaé sulcatifrons S. I. Smith, Rep. Comm. Fish and Fisher. for 1882, p. 384, Pl. V, fig. 4; Pl. VI, figs. 1—7. Occurrence. The “Ingolf? has once taken this beautiful form. West of Iceland: St. 91: 64° 44'N.L,, 31°00’ W. L., 1236 fm., temp. 3°1°; I spec. The locality lies midway between Greenland and the west coast of Iceland. In 1904, the species was twice taken by the “Thor”, namely, South of Iceland: 61°34'N.L,, 19°05’ W.L,., 2160 m., young-fish trawl, 1800 m. wire out; 9 spec. — - — 61°30’ — 17°08 — mm. — — 1800 m. a I5 — Distribution. The species was previously known only from the east coast of America from 35° 12'N.L. to 41°53'N.L.; the depths varied from 515 to 2949 fm. It is extremely probable however that this form is never a bottom-animal, but that the larger specimens live pelagically in deep water, the smaller often in less depths; the specimens taken by the “Thor” were not in greater depths than at most 400 fm., that is, nearer the surface than the bottom. Remarks. The “Ingolf” specimen is 75 mm. long; the largest of the other specimens is only 45 mm. and the other 23 smaller to quite small; some of them are really only larve with rudimentary abdominal limbs. 76. Hymenodora glacialis Buchh. 1874. Pasiphaé glacialis Buchholz, Zweite Deutsche Nordpolarfahrt, B. II, p. 279, Taf. I, Fig. 2. ! 1885. Hymenodora glacialis G. O. Sars, Norske Nordhavs-Exped., Crust. I, p. 35, Pl. IV. Occurrence. It has been taken by the “Ingolf’ at 16 stations. North of East Iceland: St. 125: 68° 08’ N. L., 16° 02’ W. L., 729 fm., temp. + 08°; I spec. South of Jan Mayen: - 113: 69°31' — 7°06' — 1309 — — +10°; 6 — — - _ - 117: 69°13, — 8°23’ — 1003 — — +10°; 12 — — - _ - 118: 88°27' — 8°20 — 1060 — — +10°; 2 — —- - _ - 112: 67°57’) — 6°44" — 1267 — — +11°; 8 — North-East of Iceland: - 119: 67°53' — 10°19' — i010 — — + 10°; 6 — — - = - 120: 67°29) — 11°32’ — 885 — — +10°3 9 — - o - rrr: 67°14" — 8°48 — 860 — ~— +099; 3 — — - = - 110; 66°44" — 11°23) — 781 — — +089; 1 — East of Iceland: St. 101: 66° 23'N. L., 12° 05’ W. L., 537 fm., temp. + 07°; I spec. — - — - 102: 66° 23' — 10°26' — 750 — — +099; 9 —- — - _ - 103: 66°23) — 852) — 579 — — +069; 3 — — - — - 104: 66°23) — 7°25 — 957 — —-— YI; 11 — =i — - 105: 65°34" — 7°31 — 762 — — +089; 11 — North of the Feeroes: St. 139: 63° 36’ N. L., 7° 30' W. L., 702 fm., temp. + 06°; 1 spec. sad ae - # 140) 63° 29) one OT GF ee gee es Ot 7 He This species has never been taken at West Greenland. On the other hand, I have seen a specimen from the south of Iceland: 62° 11'N. L., 19° 36’ W. L., roro—1145 fm., temp. (in toro fm.) 2°75° 80 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. (“Thor”). Norman gives it from the Feroe Channel: 60°3'N.L,, 5°51’ W.L., 540 fm. temp. + 1°4° It was taken three times by the 2* Amdrup Expedition: several half-digested specimens in the stomach of Procellaria glacialis from 69° 51'N. L., 11° 18’ W. L., thus between Iceland and Jan Mayen; also in the stomach of the same species of bird from 741/,° N. L., 9?/,° W. L., thus far to the north of Jan Mayen and just as far from East Greenland; and at 74° 12'N.L,, 12° W. L. one specimen “in ice hemmed in between ice-blocks”. The species was founded on a specimen taken at the surface of the sea at ca. 74°N.L. “in betrachtlicher Entfernung von der Grenze des Packeises”; it has also been taken at 72°42’N.L. between Greenland and Jan Mayen, 1064 fm. and off Kaiser Franz Joseph Fjord (a little north of 73° N.L.), 133 fm. (Ohlin). Distribution. The species was taken by the Norwegian North-Atlantic Expedition at 14 stations, all belonging to the cold area of the Norwegian Sea; the most southerly of these stations was at 63°5'N.L,., the most northerly west of Spitzbergen at 79° 59’ N. L., the depths varied from 452 to 1861 fm. A specimen was also taken in the stomach of a bottom-fish, Lycodes frigidus Coll, at a station west of Spitzbergen in 1333 fm. depth and another in the stomach of another deep-water fish, Raa hyperborea Coll. It is noted by Ohlin and Birula from several stations in the same area, at three of these it was taken in the vertical net in depths from o—2000, o—2700 and o—3000 meters. On the east coast of America it has been taken four times between 37°12'N.L. and 42° 48'N.L,, depths from 826 to 2949 im. (Smith, M. Rathbun). It is also given from the Bering Sea south of the Pribiloff Islands, 1401 fm., and from a place east of Prince of Wales Island, Alaska, 1569 fm. (M. Rath- bun). According to Faxon and M. Rathbun it has been taken three times in the Gulf of California, 857, 905 and 1208 fm.; lastly, according to Faxon in the Gulf of Panama, 1832 fm., and off Ecuador, 1740 fm. G. O. Sars 1. & writes concerning 1. glacialis: “According to its whole organisation this form must seemingly be considered to lead a kind of half pelagic life, in other words, I have reason to believe that it is not... very much bound to the bottom, but swims free up in the water. Yet the rudimentary condition of the eyes indicate with certainty that its habitat is chiefly in the deeper water-layers, which also is fully confirmed by the observations made on our expedition”. According to all available information the species must be pelagic and its central region of distribution the cold area of the Norwegian Sea; as it was twice taken in the stomach of bottom fish from great depths it can thus go down to over 1300 fm.; as it was twice taken in the stomach of birds and once on the surface it is obviously sometimes up in the surface-layers between o and 1o fm. But its geographical distribution is so remarkable that I am quite unable to give any reasonable explanation of it. Miss M. Rathbun, who is known often to set up a number of species very near to one another, has informed me that she has seen specimens from Ecuador, Gulf of California, Bering Sea, Alaska and Feeroe Channel and considers them all of the same species, so that an error in determination is scarcely probable. Remarks. I have endeavoured in vain to find some difference between my large material from the Norwegian Sea and the specimen taken south of Iceland, which might countenance the view that the last-mentioned belonged to another species. — My largest specimen (from “Ingolf” St. 103) is only 68 mm. long; Sars gives 83 mm. as the greatest length, but perhaps he measured his specimens from the tip of the antennal squama instead of from the tip of the rostrum. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 8r 77. Gennadas elegans S. I. Smith. ! 1882. Amalopeneus elegans S. I. Smith, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., Vol. X, No. 1, p. 87, Pl. XIV, figs. 8—14, Pl. XV, figs. r—15. 1903. — — Calman, Ann. & Mag. Nat. Hist, Ser. 7, Vol. XI, p. 416. 1906. Gennadas elegans Bouvier, Bull. Musée Océan. Monaco, No. 80. Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has brought home this species from 8 stations. Davis Straits: St. 25: 63° 30’ N. L., 54° 25’ W. L., 582 fm., temp. 3°3°; 2 spec. West of Iceland: St. 12: 64° 38'N. L., 32° 37'W. L., 1040 fm., temp. 03°; 2 spec. — - — - 11: 64°34’ — 31°12’ — 1300 — — 16°51 — South-West of Iceland: St. 83: 62° 25’ N.L., 28° 30’ W. L., 912 fm., temp. 3°5°; I spec. South of Iceland: St. 67: 61° 30' N. L., 22° 30' W. L., 975 fm., temp. 3:0°; 1 spec. soho ae ae - 69: 62°40’ — 22°17) — 589 — — 39°31 — Cee. tee - 40: 62°00 — 21°36) — 8&5 — — 33°31 — East of Iceland: - 105: 65°34. — 7°3r' — 762 — — o8; 1 — In Malac. Groenl. it is mentioned that a specimen was taken in a fish at Sukkertoppen, a colony in West Greenland at 65° 25'N.L. In 1903 and 1904 it was taken five times by the “Thor”. Four of these stations are in the deep water south of Iceland, from 62° 47'N.L. to 61° 30'N. L., 19° 36’ W.L. to 15°03'W.1.; at three of these stations at least it was taken pelagically in the young-fish trawl with 1800 to 1950 meters wire out; the fifth station lies “West of Iceland: 65° 00’ N. L., 28° 10’ W. L., young-fish trawl, 1000 meters wire out (depth of sea 1240 meters)”. Concerning St. 105 see under distribution. Distribution. This species has been taken off the east coast of North America at localities lying between 41°13’N.L. and 31° 41’N.L.; the depths were from 372 to 2369 fm. (Smith), One specimen was taken at 52°18’ N. L., 15°53’ W. L. with the pelagic net sunk to 1410 fm. (Calman). Ort- mann states that it was taken in the Sargasso Sea with a closing net from 690—800 fm., and also south of Cape Verde Islands in a vertical haul from o—213 fm. but whether his specimens really be- longed to G. elegans or at least some of them to any of the species later established by Bouvier it is impossible to say. Bouvier says on the distribution: Atlantique, Méditerranée. This species is not a bottom-form but lives pelagically, as a rule certainly in the deeper layers, sometimes in higher layers. Bate has already expressed the same opinion regarding the genera Gennadas and Benthesicymus. It is probably distributed throughout the deeper parts of the Atlantic, but it is lacking in the sea between Norway and Greenland—Iceland--the Feroes. As mentioned above a specimen has indeed been taken in that sea at St. 105, and though this is in all probability correct, it does not show in my opinion that the species lives in the cold area; the specimen must have been carried there by the Gulf Stream. Remarks. The genus Gennadas greatly needs revision, and it is to be hoped that Prof. Bouvier will examine the “Challenger” specimens and more fresh material from the Indian Ocean and the Pacific. Ortmann and especially Calman have remarked on the lack of agreement and the diffi- culties in connection with the descriptions of the gills in Smith, Bate and Alcock. It may be added The Ingolf-Expedition. III. 2. II 82 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. that I have examined the gills in many of my specimens and found them agreeing with the formula given by Smith (lc, p. 86). 78, Sergestes arcticus Kroyer. 1856. Sergestes arcticus Kroyer, Overs. Kgl. Danske Vid. Selsk. Forh. i 1855, p. 27. ! 18509. — — Kroyer, Kgl. Danske Vid. Selsk. Skrifter, 5. R., Naturv. og mathem. Afd., B. 4, 1859, p. 240; Tab. III, Fig. 7a—g, Tab. V, Fig. 16. 1875. -— Meyeri Metzger, Jahresber. Comm. zur wiss. Untersuch. der Deutschen Meere in Kiel fiir die Jahre 1872, 1873, p. 302, Tab. VI, Fig. 7. 1882. a= arcticus S. I. Smith, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., Vol. X, No. 1, p. 96, Pl. XVI, fig. 4. 1886. _ — §.I. Smith, Rep. Comm. Fish and Fisher. f. 1885, p. 696, Pl. XX, figs. 1, 2. 1888. — magnificus Chun, Bibliotheca Zool., B. 1, p. 33, Taf. IV, Fig. 4 & 5. ! 1897. — arcticus H. J. Hansen, Proc. Zool. Soc. London f. 1896, p. 949, 954—56. 1903. _— — H. J. Hansen, Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. f. 1903, p. 60, Pl. XII, figs. 1a—tre. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” has taken this species four times. West of Iceland: St. 12: 64° 38’ N. L., 32° 37’ W. L., 1040 fm., temp. 03°; 2 spec. ee Ot Og? 18 87° 00 ERS GS ee) ae ene ne South- — - 67: 61°30 — 22°30' — 975 — — 30°31 — North of the Feroes: St. 140: 63° 29' N. L., 6° 57’ W. L., 780 fm., temp. + 0'9°; 1 spec. Kroyer’s original specimen was taken at West Greenland at “60° odd N.L,.”, from which it may be concluded that it was taken in the Davis Straits. In 1903 and especially in 1904 the “Thor” has frequently taken this species, at 15 stations in all, in at least almost all cases with the young-fish trawl fat above the bottom. A short account of these catches may be given here. To the west of Iceland it was taken at 65° 20'N.L,., 27° 12'/,) W.L., young-fish trawl, 870 meters wire out, and at 65° 00’ N. L., 28° 10' W. L., to00 meters wire out. South of Iceland it was taken a number of times at places between 22° 23’W.L. and 17°08’ W.L,., the latitude varying between 63°15’ and 61'/,°; the length of wire out was in two cases only 100 meters, in other cases 750—800 and 1800 meters. Two of the “Thor’s” stations lie north of the Feroes (length of wire out, 1200 and 1500 meters), two of them were south-west of these islands (wire out in the one case, 820 meters). . Distribution. The species is noted from two places in the Irminger Sea at 60° N. L,, to the south-west and west of West Iceland, likewise from two places west of the Orkney Isles, being taken all four times in a vertical net (Ortmann). On the west coast of Norway it goes north at least as far as Trondhjem Fjord (G. O. Sars). Further, it is common offjthe east coast of America between 41°35) N. L. and 33° 42'N.L,. in depths from 139 to 2516 fm. It is known from the western half of the Mediter- ranean; in the Atlantic it goes south to Montevideo and to 38°5'S.B. 12° E.L. (Hansen), lastly 3 of the specimens taken by the “Challenger” south of Australia, at 47° 25'S. L., 130° 22'E.L., 2150 fm., belong to this species (Hansen). At a number of the “Thor’s” stations, namely, where 800 meters wire at least were used and where consequently the young-fish trawl was in a depth of at least 150—200 fm., specimens were taken which were adult or of considerable size; the largest was taken where 1500 to 1800 meters wire CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 83 were used, whereas those taken with 100 meters wire out are but small and far from mature. The structure of S. arcticus, the good state of preservation of the specimens taken by the “Ingolf’ and the observations mentioned of the “Thor” show clearly that the species is not a bottom-form, but lives pelagically; large to very large specimens are however never taken near the surface, and the largest are not met with, at least as a rule, above a depth of about 250 fm. and they descend probably a good deal lower. — The specimen taken by the “Ingolf” at St. 140 has certainly been carried by the Gulf Stream into the Norwegian Sea and has been taken in the warmer layers, as the species un- doubtedly does not live at the great depths with temperatures below o° in the cold area. Remarks. In my two papers on Sergestes mentioned above, I have dealt with the characteristics of this species, its distribution, the list of synonyms and likewise some of its larval stages, of which one has been described as Sergestes Rinkit Kr. The largest “Ingolf’ specimen came from St. 9 and measures 55 mim. 79. Sergestes robustus S. I. Smith. ! 1882. Sergestes robustus S. I. Smith, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Vol. X, No.1, p.g7, Pl. XVI, figs. 5—8 b. 1886. — - S. I. Smith, Rep. Comm. Fish & Fisher. for 1885, p. 697, Pl. XX, fig. 6. 1903. —_ -— H. J. Hansen, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 7, Vol. XI, p. 480, figs. 6 & 7. _ - inermis H. J. Hansen, Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., Ser. 7, Vol. XI, p. 479, figs. 1—5 (barely ‘ half-grown specimen). Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has not taken this species, but I have seen specimens from the following place. South-West of the Feeroes: 61° 08’ N. L., 9° 46'W. L., 450 fm., 3 specimens taken by the “Michael Sars” ('4/s 1902) and belonging to the Bergen Museum. Distribution. It has been taken at 59°49’ N.L., 9°46'W. L. by the “Thor”, at 52°4"/,' N. L., 12°27’ W.L. (Hansen), in the Mediterranean (Hansen) and at a number of places off the east coast of North America between 41'/;° and 34° 28'N.L,., in depths from 372 to 2574 fm. In the “Summary of the Deep-Sea Zoological Work of the Royal Indian Marine Survey Ship “Investigator” from 1884 to 1897”, 1899, p- 30, Alcock writes concerning this species: “Off coasts of South-India and Ceylon 200—go02 fathoms (common); but it is somewhat remarkable that he does not include it in his “Descriptive Catalogue of the Indian Deep-Sea Crust. Dec., Mac. and Anomura, rgo1”. Remarks. The largest specimen from the locality mentioned was 60 mm. long when scarcely fully extended. The specimens agree very well with a specimen determined by Smith received from the U.S. Nat. Museum. The specimen from the “Thor” is 90 mm. long. It appears from the list of synonyms, that I now consider the S. zzermzs founded by me in 1903 on a single not quite half-grown specimen as a young stage of S. vodustus shortly after the larval period. I have come to this result from a study of a considerable material from the Monaco Museum, from E. Holt, and from the “Travailleur” and “Talisman”. The reasons for my considering in 1903 the differences between an adult specimen of S. vodustus and the specimen described as S. inermis to be specific differences, arose in the first place from the complete lack of transitional stages, and in the second from the fact that our Museum possesses some plump specimens, some of $a 84 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. which are in the M/astigopus-stages, others a little more advanced in development, and these I had taken to be the developmental stages of .S. vobustus, but according to my later observations these must belong to a species which is not known at any rate from the Atlantic. In 1896 I founded S. mediterraneus on several specimens, in the largest of which the eyes were not yet black, while the others were MJastigopus-forms. In 1903 I included S. mediterraneus as a synonym under .S. déssimilis Bate. It appears now that .S. dissimilis is the Mastigopus-stage of S. vobustus, so that intermediate stages have been described as S. dzcertus H. J. H. and as “the sub- adult stage” of S. mediterraneus H. J. H. II. Order: Euphausiacea.’ Within the region, the fauna of which is dealt with here, only 10 species in all have been taken of this Order?. As nearly all have been so well described and figured that they can be recognised with certainty, my notes are made relatively fairly short, the more so as I intend in the near future to publish a monograph of the whole Order based on an extremely large material. Analytical figures etc. will be much more suited to such a monograph and of more use there than if they were given here. Y 1. Thysanopoda acutifrons Holt & Tatt. 1905. Thysanopoda pectinata H. J. Hansen, Bull. Mus. Océan., Monaco, No. 30, p. 16, Fig. 12 (nec T. pectinata Ortmann). 1905. _ acutifrons Holt & Tattersall, Rep. Sea and Inland Fisheries of Ireland, 1902—1903, Part II, App. No. IV, p. 102 and 134 (immature specimens). 1905. a — H. J. Hansen, Bull. Mus. Océan. Monaco, No. 42, p. 22. ! 1906. -- _ Holt & Tattersall, Fisheries, Ireland, Sc. Invest. 1904, V, p. 8, Pl. I. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” took this large species in the trawl at 4 stations: West of Iceland: St. 12: 64° 38’ N. L., 32° 37' W. L., 1040 fm.; 1 spec. — - — - 9: 64°18’ — 27°00° — 295 —;1 — South-West of Iceland: St. 17: 62° 49’ N. L., 26° 55’ W. L., 745 fm.; 2 spec. — -_ = - 83: 62°25) — |. 28°30' — 912 —3;2 — 1 I see no reason for following Stebbing and call this order Thysanopodacea because the oldest of the genera has the corresponding name. If an author (in casu J. Boas) has set up a group as order — or family — given it a name and for that purpose used one of the genera of the group as basis, this name chosen by the author of the order or family has priority and should be maintained — unless the name of the genus in question must be dropped. Just as it is necessary (so far as it is possible within reasonable limits) to maintain the oldest names for species and genera, we must also go upon the same principle in retaining the oldest name for a family or order irrespective of how it was formed; in this way we have more stability than on any other method of procedure. It is another matter, that in forming a family it would be best to use immediately the oldest generic name as family name. 2 Ortmann in his work on the Schizopoda of the Plankton-Expedition has stated that 7hysanopoda microphthalma G. O. S. is present from the Irminger Sea (at 60° N. L.). According to the form and equipment of the antenne as shown in the author's figure his determination is incorrect, and I think he has had small specimens of 7. acutifrons Holt & Tatt. which is not rare in these waters, CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 85 It was also taken by the “Thor” in 1903 and 1904 at the following stations: West of Iceland: 65° 20' N. L., 27° 12'/,' W. L., Young-fish trawl with 810 m. wire out (actual depth 720 m,). — - — 65°00’ — 28° 10! —, _ — — 1000m. —- (— — 1240m.). South of Iceland: 62° 10’ N. L., 19° 36' W. L., (depth 1900—2150 m.). — - — 61°34’ — 19°05) — , — — — 1800m. — (actual depth 2160 m.). —- - _ 61°30 — 17°08 — , — — — 1800m. South-West of the Feeroes: 61° 15’N. L., 9° 35’ W. L.; (depth 900 m.). Distribution. The species was founded in 1905 on specimens taken off the west coast of Ireland. It is mentioned above (footnote p. 84) that Zhysanopoda microphthalma Ortm. (nec G. O. Sars) from the Irminger Sea at 60° N. L. is probably the young of this species. It was taken by the “Thor” in 1905 at three places: far to the south-west of the Feroes, west of the Hebrides and south-west of Ireland, each time in the young-fish trawl with respectively 1200, 1500 and 1000 meters wire out. The Prince of Monaco has taken several specimens at two stations to the west of France, the most southerly being at 46'/,°N.L.; the apparatus was sunk to 1490 and 3000 meters. It was never taken on any of the numerous occasions, when the vertical net was used from 100 fm. to the surface or the young- fish trawl in similar small depths within the area mentioned under occurrence and distribution. To judge from the “Thor’s” results it is clearly not rare in intermediate layers in depths from about 200 down to 400 or 450 fm. Remarks. In the synonymy list it will be seen, that (in April 1905) I first gave a preliminary description of this species under an erroneous determination, but that this error was corrected later (in July), and at the latter place I then gave a detailed description of adult and half-grown specimens, and also indicated the differences between it and the nearly related 7. distinguenda H.J.H. An elaborate description with fine figures was published in 1906 by Holt & Tattersall. The largest speci- men comes from St. 83 “Ingolf’? and measures 43 mm. 2. Meganyctiphanes norvegica M. Sars. 1857. Thysanopoda norvegica M. Sars, Forh. Skand. Naturf. syvende Mode i Christiania 1856, p. 169. 1886. Nyctiphanes -- Koelbel, Die oesterr. Polarst. Jan Mayen, p. 48, Taf. III, Fig. 7—10. !1g05. Meganyctiphanes norvegica Holt & Tattersall, Rep. Sea and Inland Fisheries of Ireland, 1902— 1903, Part II, No. IV, p. 105 and 135, Pl. XVI. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” took this species at numerous stations, most times in the trawl. West of Iceland: St. 12: 64° 38’ N.L., 32° 37’ W. L.; 1 spec. — - — - g: 64°18! — 27°00 — 3 — North of East Iceland: St. 126: 67° 19’ N. L., 15° 52’W. L.; 1 spec. South of Jan Mayen: - 116: 70°05) — 8°265 — Ir — pene ui _ - 112: 67°57, — 6°44 — 2 — — _ - rr: 67°14 — 8°48 — I — North-East of Iceland: - 120: 67°290' — 11°32) — 3 — East of Iceland: St. tor: 66° 23’ N. L., 12° 05’ W. L.; 5 spec. 86 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. East of Iceland: St. 104: 66° 23' N. L., 7° 25’ W. L.; 1 spec. Sp Ras AVEO TORT SA He 27" BEd Be — - — - 106: 65°34 — 854’ — IT — North-West of the Feeroes: St. 3: 63° 35’ N. L., 10° 24’ W. L.; 1 spec. North of the Feeroes: St. 140: 63° 29' N. L., 6° 57’ W. L.; 1 spec. = — - 138: 63°26 — 7°56° — 4 — — - -— - 141: 63°22' — 6°58 — 3 — This species has never been taken in Baffin Bay, Davis Straits or waters south of Cape Fare- well, nor to the north-west or north of Iceland except at the St. 126 mentioned: north of East Ice- land. To the west, south-west and south of Iceland it was taken a number of times by the “Thor”, which also found it in Rode Fjord on the east coast of Iceland; it has been taken by several in- vestigators over the ridge between the Feeroes and Iceland, and it is also common round the Feeroes. It was taken by Ryder’s expedition near Jan Mayen, from which it is also noted by Koelbel. Ohlin mentions it from two places at East Greenland, namely, 72° 42’ N. L., 14° 49’ W. L. and from a place a little further north off Kaiser Franz Joseph Fjord; Buchholz mentions it from Cape Wynn in 74° 30'N. L,, 19° W. L. Distribution. From the Feeroes this species extends southwards along the British Isles (several observers), it also occurs in the Atlantic off France (Norman, Hansen, Holt & Tattersall), off Portugal (Norman), near the Gorringe Bank oft Gibraltar (Hansen) and in the western part of the Mediterranean at least to Messina (Lo Bianco, Hansen). It was next taken in the Kattegat (Intern. Explor.), Skager Rak (Metzger, Meinert), at Bohuslan (Goés), along the whole coast of Norway from Christiania Fjord to Vadso in East Finmark (G. O. Sars), in the White Sea (Jarzynsky), in the Barents Sea (Breitfuss), at 75° N. L., 12° E. L. (Goés), lastly in the North Polar Sea by the “Fram” at ca. 81° N. L,, 124°E.L. On the east coast of North America it has been found in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, at Nova Scotia, in Massachusetts Bay and as far to the south as ca. 4o°N.L. Richters gives it with a query from the Bering Sea, but this determination is certainly extremely doubtful. Holt & Tattersall in 1905 and 1906 contribute to our knowledge of the distribution of the species in bathymetric regard; extremely important information on the same theme is given by S. L Smith (1879) and G. H. Fowler (1905). I am not able to add to our knowledge in this regard, but may note, however, that the species was twice taken (only 1 spec. each time) in the so-called cylinder-net, an apparatus often towed near the surface by the “Ingolf? when steaming at its usual rate. Remarks. I have arrived at the result that Holt & Tattersall’s genus Meganyctiphanes ought to be accepted. The two authors pointed out an excellent generic difference in the female sex between this new genus and Wyctiphanes G. O. Sars; I can add that in the male the clasping organs of the first pair of pleopoda differ exceedingly from each other in the two genera. 3. Rhoda inermis Kroyer. 1846. Thysanopoda inermis Kroyer, Voy. en Scand., Crust, Pl. 7, figs. 2,a—t. ! 1882. Euphausia inermis G. O. Sars, Forh. Vid. Selsk. Christiania for 1882, Nr. 18, p.51, Tab. I, Fig. 15. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 87 Occurrence. The “Ingolf? has taken this species at 10 localities. West Greenland: Godthaab Fjord, a small ebb pool; 1 specimen. West of Iceland: St. 9: 64°18'N.L., 27° 00' W. L., Trawl, 295 fm.; 1 spec. North-East of Iceland: St. 121: 66° 59’ N.L., 13° 11'W. L., Vertical net, roo—o fm.; 3 spec. East of Iceland: St. 103: 66° 23'N.L., 8° 52'W.L,., Vertical net, 1oo-—o fm.; 2 spec. — = - - 105: 65°34’ — 7°31' — ‘Trawl, 762 fm.; 1 spec. — - - - 58: 64°25’ — 12°09! — _ Plankton net, roo—o fm; 3 spec. South-East of Iceland: St. 57: 63° 37'N. L., 13° 02' W. L., Trawl, 350 fm.; 1 spec. — - —_ - 3: 63°35' — 10°24 — .— 272 —3;2 — North of the Feeroes: St. 140: 63°29’ — 6°57) — — 7o—;1 — — - _ - 141: 63°22) — 6°58 — — 679 —3;1I — In Malac. Groenl. this species is mentioned from West Greenland as taken at “Egedesminde and Ritenbenk” as also Godhavn; later it has been found at Jakobshavn (Traustedt); it thus goes northwards here at least to 69° 13’ N. L., perhaps to 69° 44’N.L. A specimen is present from 59° N. L,, 51° W. L., south-west from Cape Farewell. It was taken by the “Thor” and other investigators a number of times on the west, south and east of Iceland, and it appears likewise in the fjords, being taken in Skjalfandi on the north coast, in Mid Fjord, Seydis Fjord, Rode Fjord and Beru Fjord on the east coast. It was taken by the “Ingolf”, as noted above, somewhat to the north of the Feeroes, but has hitherto not been found to the west, east or south of these islands. It was taken by the 2"4 Amdrup Expedition at Jan Mayen, from which it was already noted by Koelbel, also at ca. 731/.°N.L,, 4° W.L. and ca. 741/, N. L., 8/2 W.L,.; Ohlin gives it for several places along East Greenland between ca. 71'/,° and 731/,°N. L., at the last-mentioned latitude in Kaiser Franz Joseph Fjord. Distribution. The species has been taken at Shetland and twice at Scotland (Norman) going southward to ca.55'/,N.L. Further, it has been taken at several places in the North Sea and twice in the Channel’s western end off the Scilly Islands and still more to the south towards the French coast (Gough). In the northern Kattegat it has been taken once (Meinert); it is extremely frequent “off the northern shores of Norway” (G. O. Sars), has been taken in the Kara Sea (Hansen), round about Spitz- bergen both west and east side (Ohlin, Zimmer), as also at Franz Joseph Land (Stebbing). On the east coast of America it is known from the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Bay of Fundy and from there southward to Vineyard Sound (ca. 41!/, N. L.) (S. I. Smith). It is this species which according to G. O. Sars appears at Finmark in such masses, that it forms the chief food of the blue whale and sometimes the food of the green cod. It was twice taken by the “Thor” in the young-fish trawl with respectively 15 and 4o meters line out; it was taken 3 times by the “Ingolf” in the vertical net from roo to o fm. It appears from these 5 catches and from the literature, that the species often lives in the upper water-layers, but it is impossible at present to say whether it lives as a rule or always in the open sea at a distance of less than 100 fm. from the surface. 4. Rhoda Raschii M. Sars. 1864. Thysanopoda Raschii M. Sars, Forh. i Vid. Selsk. Christiania for 1863, p. 83. ! 1882. Euphausia Raschii G. O. Sars, Forh. i Vid. Selsk. Christiania for 1882, No. 18, p. 51. 88 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has only twice taken this species. Davis Straits: St. 29: 65° 34’ N. L., 54° 31’ W. L., Trawl, 68 fm.; 2 spec. — -- - 28: 65° 144 —. 55°42’ — _ Vertical net, roo—o fm.; 1 spec. On the west coast of Greenland it is known from Karajok Fjord, ca. 70° 20'N. L. (Vanhéffen) . and in Malac. Groenl. I have mentioned various localities in the region from ca. 70° to 64?/;'N.L. It was taken by the “Thor” a number of times at Iceland, namely, from the north-west coast in Patrik Fjord, from the north coast in @fjord and Skjalfandi, from the east coast in Rode Fjord; it is present also from Seydis Fjord on the same coast, taken with the previous species by Hallas; Ostenfeld has it from a spot south-west of Iceland. In the East Greenland waters it has only once been taken, at ca. 74° 20'N. L., 15° W. L. (Buchholz). Distribution. This species is further known from localities along both sides of Scotland (Norman). It was taken by the “Thor” several miles west of St. Kilda and twice in the Skagerak due south of Norway at 57°52'N.L. It was founded on specimens from the Christiania Fjord, and Sars states that he has taken it “now and then” on the west coast of Norway, but does not give the northern limits. We know at present no more of the distribution of this species, which is probably much greater. We may believe that the gaps are partly due to its having been sometimes confused with or not separated from the previous species. 5. Thysanoéssa longicaudata Kroyer. 1846. Thysanopoda longicaudata Kroyer, Voy. en Scand., Crust. Pl. 8, figs. 1, a—f. 1882. Thysanoéssa tenera G. O. Sars, Forh. Vid. Selsk., Christiania, p. 53, No. 18, Tab. I, Fig. 1g—20. ! 1905. —_ longicaudata Holt & Tattersall, Rep. Sea and Inland fisheries of Ireland, 1902—1903, Part II, App. no. II, p. 107 & 138, Pl. XV. Occurrence, The “Ingolf’ has taken this species at numerous places: Davis Straits: St. 28: 65° 14'N. L., 55° 42’ W. L., Vertical net, 10o—o fm.; 5 spec. _ _ - 37: 60°17) — 54°05’ — Surface; 4 spec. South-West of Greenland: St. 22: 58° 10’ N. L., 48° 25’ W.L., Vertical net, 200—o fm.; 14 spec. West of Iceland: St. 91: 64° 44'N. L., 31° 00' W. L., Plankton net, roo—o fm.; 1 spec. South-West of Iceland: St. 78: 60° 37’ N. L., 27° 52' W. L., Plankton net, 10oo—o fm.; 1 spec. — - = - 39: 62°00' — 22°38) — _ 100o—O —; I — - - = - 68: 62°06! — 22°30’ — Vertical net, 1oo—o —; 12 — South of Iceland: St. 63: 62° 4o' N. L., 19° 05’ W.L., Vertical net, 1oo—o fm.; 11 spec. —- - _ - 54: 63°08’ — 15°40 — — 100-0 —;1I0 — South-East of Iceland: St. 57: 63° 17'N. L,, 13° 02'W. L., Vertical net, roo—o fm.; 15 spec. — - - - 47: 61° 32) — 13°40 — -- I0oo—O —3; 2 ~ South of Jan Mayen: St.117: 69°13 — 8°23) — _ 10oo—O —; I — North-East of Iceland: - 120: 67°29’ — 11°32" — _ 100-0 —; 9 — — - = - 121: 66°59 — 13°11) — _ I00O—O —; 5 — CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 89 East of Iceland: St. 101: 66° 23' N. L., 12°05 W.L., Vertical net, 1oo—o fm.; 1 spec. — - _ - 103: 66°23) — 8°52) — — 100—O —; 13 — — - — - 58: 64°25’ — 12°09! — Planktonnet,r0oo—o —; 1 — North of the Feeroes: St. 138: 63° 26’ N. L., 7° 56’ W. L., Trawl, 471 fm.; 1 spec. West of the Feeroes: 63° 26'N.L., 10°47’ W. i. Surface; 2 spec. The species is recorded from Karajok Fjord, ca. 70° 20'N. L., on the west coast of Greenland (Vanh6ffen), from Davis Straits at 62° 06'N. L., 55° 56’ W. L. (Norman) and from the waters south-west of Greenland at 59° N. L. 51° W. L. (Hansen). It has many times been taken by various expeditions, especially by the “Thor” in 1904, in the waters round Iceland as also to the west and south of the Feeroes. It was taken at Jan Mayen by the 2"? Amdrup Expedition and at 73'/,.°N. L., 4° W. L.; finally by the Ryder Expedition at East Greenland at 70° 22'N. L. Distribution. The species is known from the Feroe Channel (Norman), Scotland (Norman), northern part of North Sea and west coast of Ireland (Holt & Tattersall). It is even noted from the Skager Rak (Intern. Explor.). G. O. Sars gives it from the west coast of Norway without indicating the southern limit, from Varanger Fjord and from 4 stations between Norway and Jan Mayen. It is also noted from Bear Island, from North-East Spitzbergen and north of Spitzbergen at 81° 20'N. L. (Zimmer); it was taken by the “Fram” much further to the north of Spitzbergen at 84—841/.°N. L,; further, north-east of Franz Joseph Land at ca. 84'/.°N.L., 72° E.L,, lastly at ca. 80° N.L,, 124° EK. L. (G. O. Sars). It was taken on the German Plankton-Expedition not only in the direct line from the north point of Scotland to Cape Farewell, but also several times on the line from 60°N.L,, 42° W. L. to near the southernmost corner of Newfoundland (Ortmann). It was taken three times by the Plankton-Expedition in the cylinder net, thus near the sur- face, by the “Ingolf” twice near the surface and 15 times in depths between 1oo and o fm. Asa result of these numerous catches we are justified in concluding that the species is found as a rule in the upper water layers, either near the surface or at any rate not deeper than 100 fm. under this. According to Holt & Tattersall the specimens from the west coast of Ireland differ in various small details from the Norwegian specimens, but the differences are so small that the authors do not even set up the Irish form — which they think resembles greatly the Faroe specimens — as a variety. Their observations with regard to the bathymetric occurrence of the Irish specimens do not agree, however, with the conclusions I have considered myself justified in drawing above. 6. Thysanoéssa neglecta Kroyer. 1846. Thysanopoda neglecta Kroyer, Voy. en Scand., Crust. Pl. 7, figs. 3 a—d. ! 1882. Thysanoéssa borealis G. O. Sars, Forh. Vid. Selsk. Christiania for 1882, p. 52, No. 18, Tab. I, Fig. 16—18. Occurrence, This species was not taken by the “Ingolf’, but the Copenhagen Museum possesses some specimens from 4 places lying within our area. South-West Iceland: Skagi, 20 fm., “Thor” 1903; 1 spec. —- — : West of Geirfugleskjzr, Young-fish trawl, with 100 m. wire out, “Thor” 1904; ; great quantity of specimens. The Ingolf-Expedition. III. 2. ~ go CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. South-West Iceland: 63° 46’ N. L., 22° 56' W. L., 80 fm., “Thor” 1904; some spec. East Iceland: Mid Fjord, 40'/,—50 fm., “Diana”; I spec. It is noted from West Greenland, Karajok Fjord in ca. 70° 20’ N. L. (VanhGffen), but the specimen I have mentioned in Malac. Groenl. as coming from 59°N.L., 51° W.L. has proved on renewed examination to be a young Rhoda inermis, in which the eyes were to a certain degree divided into two portions. Distribution. The species is also known from the Feroe Channel, Shetland, northern part of the North Sea and East Scotland (several observers), Skager Rak (Internat. Explor.), also from the west coast of Ireland (Holt & Tattersall), but Caullery’s statement that it occurs in the Bay of Biscay is probably due to an erroneous determination. It is further known from the Norwegian west coast and Varanger Fjord (G. O. Sars), from Horn Sound at Spitzbergen (Zimmer) and finally has been found on the north-east coast of North America at Eastport, Maine (Norman). — Norman and Ort- mann bring in as synonymous 7: dongipfes Brandt from the Sea of Ochotsk and Zimmer follows them hesitatingly. But judging from Brandt’s observation that spines are present on the upper posterior margin of some of the abdominal segments this reference is quite incorrect; through the kindness of Dr. A. Birula I have been able to examine a couple of Brandt’s (extremely mutilated) type-specimens, which show, as stated by him, well-developed dorsal processes. Remarks. A renewed examination of the very old and badly preserved specimens investigated by Kroyer has shown, that most of these in which the eyes are preserved belong to this species (which was, however, first well described by Sars under the name 7: doreals), whilst some specimens, to judge from the eyes, belong to Rhoda imermis. Kroyer’s figure is poor, and he has never given a description, but as most of the specimens seen by him belong to 7: dorealis I still keep Kroyer’s name for the species. If Kroyer’s name has to be scored out, the species according to Norman’s synonymy list must be called 7: aberdonensis Sim. 7. Nematoscelis megalops G. O. Sars. 1883. Nematoscelis megalops G. O. Sars, Forh. Vid. Selsk. Christiania for 1883, no. 7, p. 27. ! 1885. _ ts G. O. Sars, Challenger Rep., Zoology, Vol. XIII, p. 127, Pl. XXIII, figs. 5—ro, Pl. XXIV. 1905. -- ~ H. J. Hansen, Bull. Mus. Océan. Monaco, No. 30, p. 27. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” did not find this species but it has been taken by the “Thor” in 1904 at 4 localities: South-West Iceland: West of Geirfugleskjzr, Young-fish trawl with 100 m. wire out; I spec. West of the Feeroes: 61°40’N.L., 14°11' W.L,, — — — 800 m. — I — South-West of the Fzeroes: 61°21'N.L., 10°59'W.L., — —- — 8m — 7 — (42,3¢). — - _ :61°1s’ — 9°35) — — — — 9g0o m. _ 6 — (5%10). Distribution, This oceanic species is known from the North Sea (Intern. Explor.), from the east coasts of Scotland and North England (Norman), Irish Sea and west of Ireland (Holt & Tatter- sall); in 1905 the “Thor” found it several times to the west and north-west of the Hebrides. It has a CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. gi wide distribution in the Atlantic and western Mediterranean (several observers and Copenhagen Mu- seum). The Plankton-Expedition has taken it in the Irminger Sea at 60°N.L. and east of New- foundland; it was also taken off Nova Scotia, off France, at the Azores as also between Buenos Ayres, Tristan d’Acunha and Cape of Good Hope, whilst it is still unrecorded from the part of the Atlantic lying between ca. 28°N.L. and 37°S.L. The Copenhagen Museum also has it from two places in the southern part of the Indian Ocean: 40° 8'S. L., 52° E. L. and 40° 41'S. L., 85° 22’ E.L. On the other hand I cannot accept Ortmann’s note of its occurrence in the eastern Pacific as correct until further information is forthcoming. The fact that the Copenhagen Museum has older material from no less than 12 widely separated places shows that the species comes up to the surface at any rate sometimes in the night, as the material has been collected for us by the captains of trading ships by means of a net towed after the ship. — G. H. Fowler (1905) gives a detailed report on the bathymetric distribution of the species in the Bay of Biscay; it was partly taken with an open vertical net, partly with a closing net and the results are “that the centre of distribution lay about 50 and 75 fathoms”, that the species was also taken in 12 per cent. of the hauls near the surface and in the closing net as deep down as 750—500 fm. and in several intervening depths up to a haul in r50—50 fm. Remarks. Males are much more rare than females. Sars has only seen females and neither Ortmann nor Holt & Tattersall say anything of males, which indicates that they have not taken specimens of this sex. As I have shown in the paper mentioned in the synonymy list, males differ in the most distinct manner from the females by lacking the very long and thin rostrum present in the latter. These males were taken by the “Thor”, and neither in the older material of the Museum nor amongst over 20 specimens taken in 1904 by the Prince of Monaco are there any males. 8. Nematobrachion boopis Calm. ! 1896. Nematodactylus boopis Calman, Trans. Roy. Irish. Acad., Vol. XXXI, p. 17, figs. 19g—28. 1905. Nematobrachion -— Calman, Rep. Sea and Inland Fisheries of Ireland, 1902—1903, Part IJ, App. 4, p. 153, Pl. XXVI. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” did not take this beautiful form, but it was found by the “Thor” at the following 6 stations. West of Iceland: 65° oo' N. L., 28° 10’ W. L., Young-fish trawl with 1000 m. wire out; 5 spec. (depth 1240 m.). South- — 61°34’ — 19°05) — — — — 1800m. — 2— ( — 2160m.). — - a 62° 490° — 18°46 — aa — — 100m. —- I- West of the Feroes: 61° 49' N. L., 14° 11’ W. L., Young-fish trawl with 800 m. wire out; 3 spec. South-West of the Feeroes: 61° 15 N. L., 9° 35’ W. L., Young-fish trawl with goo m. wire out; 2 spec. _— - — 61°08’ — 9° 28 — — — — 820 m. - I — Distribution. In 1905 the “Thor” took this species 3 times west and north-west of the Hebrides, further, south-west of Ireland and west of North France: 6 times in all and only with the young-fish trawl, but the length of line out varied from 300 to 1500 meters. It was known earlier from the waters west and south-west of Ireland (Calman, Holt & Tattersall), also from a place west of France and from a number of stations within the triangular area: Gorringe Bank, the Azores and 12* 92 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. the Canary Isles (Hansen). Ortmann enumerates it from the waters near Hawaii, but to judge from a preliminary examination of material from the Pacific I am inclined to think that the animals from this ocean must be referred to a hitherto unnamed species. As it is not present in the older though very large material in the Copenhagen Museum, which was all taken practically near the surface in the Atlantic etc, I believe we may conclude that it as a rule does not approach the surface, but according to the “Thor’s” catches it must sometimes occur in depths between ca. 75 and 25 fm. g. Stylocheiron maximum n. sp. Description. While studying a rich material of “Stylocheiron abbreviatum G. O. Sars” from the Atlantic, the Indian Ocean and the Pacific, I discovered that it comprised two allied but very distinct species, one of which was S. chelifer Chun, while the other was either S. abdreviatum G. O. Sars or a species hitherto undescribed. S. abéveviatum has been established on “Challenger” specimens much less than half-grown; by the aid of Sars’ figures and a couple of sketches kindly drawn by Dr. Calman for me from Sars’ type I arrived at the opinion that S. abdreviatum is synonymous with S. chelifer; consequently it became necessary to give the new species a name, and S. maximum was chosen as appropriate. The discovery was made after the plates to this paper were finished; I will therefore only point out the two most conspicuous differences between S. maximum n. sp. and .S. abdre- viatum G. O. Sars (= S. chelifer Chun), postponing a more detailed account with figures to a subse- quent occasion. In adult and subadult specimens of .S. maximum the eyes have the upper section slightly or at most a little smaller than the lower; besides, the fourth and fifth abdominal segments have no median dorsal tooth. In adult and subadult specimens of S. abéreviatum the eyes have their upper section much smaller than the lower, and the fourth and fifth abdominal segments each a conspicuous dorsal median tooth from the hind margin. In half-grown or still somewhat smaller specimens of S. abére- viatum the abdominal armature mentioned is feebly developed, and the upper section of the eyes is pro- portionately still smaller than in larger specimens; in small specimens of S. maximum the eyes have their upper section somewhat smaller as compared with the lower than in large specimens, but that section is yet conspicuously larger than in the other species. S. maximum is even larger than S. abbreviatum; the specimen secured by the “Thor” is an adult male, measuring 23°5 mm. from the end of rostrum to the tip of telson. Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has not taken this fine species, but it was brought home by the “Thor” in 1904. West of the Feeroes: 61° 49’ N. L., 14° 11’ W. L., Young-fish trawl with 800 m. wire out; I spec. Distribution. Here it may be briefly stated that I have seen specimens of S. maximum both from the Atlantic and from the Indian Ocean. I am inclined to think that at least some of my predecessors (for instance Ortmann) have mixed up S. maximum with the other species. Io. Stylocheiron longicorne G. O. Sars. 1883. Stylocheiron longicorne G. O. Sars, Forh. Vid. Selsk. Christiania for 1883, no. 7, p. 32. ! 1885. — — G. O, Sars, Challenger Rep., Zool. Vol. XIII. p. 144, Pl. XXVII, fig. 5. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 93 Occurrence, The “Ingolf” has not taken this species but it was twice found by the “Thor” in 1904. South of Iceland: 63° 08’ N. L., 21° 30’ W. L., Young-fish trawl with 250 m. wire out; I spec. South-West of the Feeroes: 61° 15'N.L,, 9° 35’ W. L., Young-fish trawl with rooo m. wire out; 2 spec. Distribution. The species was twice taken to the west of the Hebrides by the “Thor”; it is frequent to the west and south-west of Ireland and in the Bay of Biscay (Holt & Tattersall), at the Azores and Canary Isles (Hansen), and in the Atlantic between 42° N. L. and 8°S. L. (Ortmann); it is not rare in the western Mediterranean (several observers) and was founded on a specimen taken south of the Cape of Good Hope. — As the species is quite lacking in the older material of the Copenhagen Museum it must occur rarely near the surface, though it has been taken there (Ortmann, Holt & Tattersall, etc.). Fowler (1905) gives a detailed account of its bathymetric occurrence in the Bay of Biscay; reference for details may be made to his paper. Remarks. In the Monaco Bulletin No. 30 I have brought in S. dongicorne as synonym to S. Suhmit, which last I thought was founded on not fully developed specimens. Later investigation of an immense material from various seas has shown me, that there are four nearly related species with long antennular peduncles, and therefore I must restore the name .S. dongicorne, but an account (with figures) of the four species is postponed to a paper in preparation. Ill. Order: Mysidacea. Within the region the fauna of which is treated here 35 species of this Order have hitherto been found. But, whilst I have seen specimens from this region of all the species of Decapoda and Euphausiacea (with exception of a single doubtful form), there are no fewer than 4 species of the Mysidacea noted in the following pages which are mentioned exclusively on other authorities. The limits of the region dealt with, sources of the material, synonymy etc. have been mentioned in the introduction to the Malacostraca, to which reference may be made. A. Suborder Lophogastrida. 1. Gnathophausia zoéa Will.-Suhm. Pl, IV, figs. 3 a—3 e. 1875. Gnathophausia zoéa Willemoés-Suhm, Trans. Linn. Soc. Ser. 2, Vol. I, p. 32, Pl. IX, figs. 2—15. ! 1885. _ — G.O.Sars, Challenger Rep. Zool., Vol. XIII, p. 44, Pl. VI, figs. 6—10. = — willemoesii G. O. Sars, Challenger Rep., Zool., Vol. XIII, p. 38, Pl. V, figs. 1—6. Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has taken this species 9 times. Davis Straits: St. 25: 63° 30'N. L., 54° 25’ W. L., 582 fm.; 1 spec. West of Iceland: St. 12: 64° 38’ N. L., 32° 37’ W. L., 1040 fm.; 1 spec. — ee - It: 64°34 — 31°12’ — 1300 — I — 94. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. West of Iceland: St. go: 64° 45’ N. L., 29° 06' W. L., 568 fm.; 1 spec. South-West of Iceland: St.17: 62° 49’ N. L., 26° 55’ W. L., 745 fm.; 1 spec. — : - 83: 62°25' — 28°30' — 912 —; 1 carapace. = - -- - 18: 61°44" — 30°29’ — 1135 —; 1 spec. South of Iceland: St. 41: 61° 39’ N. L., 17° 10° W. L., 1245 fm.; 1 spec. West of the Feroes: St. 42: 61° 41’ N. L,, 10° 17'W. L., 625 fm.; 1 spec. Further, it has been taken four times within our region by the “Thor”, three of the times in the waters south of Iceland, whilst the fourth place was at 65° 00' N.L., 28° 10'W. L,, i.e. in the Irminger Sea west of Iceland, yet a little more northerly than St. go “Ingolf’. It was taken all four times in the young-fish trawl and the amount of wire out varied between 1000 to 1800 meters, so that the real depth in which the specimens were taken varied from ca. 200 to at most 450 fm., whilst the depth of water at the stations varies from ca. 750 to over 1000 fm. Distribution. The “Thor” has taken the species to the west of the Hebrides and west of Brittany (both times in the young-fish trawl and length of wire out respectively 1500 and 500 meters). It is noted from several places in the northern temperate and tropical Atlantic (Sars, Caullery, Holt & Tattersall, Hansen, Ortmann), from several places in the Indian Ocean (Alcock), south of Amboina, in the Banda Sea (G. O. Sars’ locality for G. Willemoésit), lastly from some places in the Pacific Ocean (G. O. Sars, Faxon, Ortmann). To judge from the “Thor’s” catches the species does not live at the bottom but in intermediate layers. A specimen taken with 500 meters wire out, thus in a depth of at most ca. 125 fm. is quite small and this is also the case with a specimen taken with 1000 meters wire out, whilst among the specimens taken with 1500 meters wire out there is one somewhat more than half-grown, and among those taken with 1800 meters wire out there is a large specimen. It seems to be the same here as with Sergestes arcticus and S. robustus, that small specimens are often at least found nearer the sur- face than the larger and that the wholly developed specimens are always only met with in deeper layers. Remarks. The largest specimen is a female with marsupium (from “Ingolf” Stat. 17) measuring go mm. from tip of rostrum to end of telson, whilst a male (taken by the “Thor”) is 86 mm. long; Sars’ largest specimen was only 70 mm. The spine at the distal extremity of the squama of the an- tennz usually reaches a little beyond this, but in the large female scarcely to the extreme end of the squama; the outer edge of the spine is smooth without crenulations, and I have not seen such an equipment of small teeth as is shown by Sars’ fig.9. The rostrum and especially the posterior process of the carapace are relatively longer in small than in large specimens, which last form a transition to G. Willemoéstt G.O.S. as figured 1. c. Pl. V, figs. 1--2. I believe that Ortmann is right in cancelling G, Willemoésti as founded on large specimens of G. zoéa; I have examined Sars’ specimens of his G, Willemoéstt in the British Museum (Natural History) but notes on these specimens are postponed to a future publication. On Pl. IV I have represented (figs. 3b and 3c) the distal portion of both mandibles seen from above and (fig.3.a) the same portion of the left mandible seen from below, also the left maxillula (fig. 3d) and maxilla (fig. 3 e). The two last figures especially I believe to be of some interest, as they show the segmental structure of these appendages and from which joints the various lobes arise, CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 95 whilst the figures given by G. O. Sars and Coutiére are either defective or incorrect. The description to the plate furnishes sufficient explanation for the understanding of these figures. 2. Eucopia unguiculata Will.-Suhm. 1875. Chalaraspis unguiculata Willemoés-Suhm, Trans. Linn. Soc., Ser. 2, Vol. I, p. 37—40, Pl. VIII. 1885. Eucopia australis G. O. Sars, Challenger Rep., Zool., Vol. XIII, p. 55, Pls. IX—X. Only in part, whilst #. australis Dana is another species. !1g05. — unguiculata H. J. Hansen, Bull. Mus. Océan. Monaco, No..42, p. 3. Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has taken this species at 8 localities: Davis Straits: St. 36: 61° 50’ N. L., 56° 21’ W. L., 1435 fm; 1 spec. South of Greenland: St. 21: 58° or’ N. L., 44° 45’ W. L., 1330 fm; 2"/, spec. West of Iceland: St. 12: 64° 38’ N. L., 32° 37’ W. L., 1040 fm.; ca. 20 spec. See TT: G40 4 — . Ba ta eo —; 7/2 Spec. South-West of Iceland: St. 17: 62° 49’ N. L., 26° 55’ W. L., 745 fm.; 3 spec. _ - _ - 83: 62°25° — 28°30 — 9g12 —3;5 — South of Iceland: St. 40: 62° 00’ N. L., 21° 36’ W. L., 835 fm.; 3 spec. —-— - = - 49: 62°07, — 15°07’ — 1120 —; 1/, spec. The species has been taken by the “Thor” three times to the south of Iceland and once south- west of the Feeroes; for two of these the apparatus used was the young-fish trawl with 1800 meters wire out. Distribution. AsSars has mixed together 3 species (Z. australis Dana, Z. unguiculata Will.-Suhm, and £. sculpticauda Faxon) in his description of Z. australis and as later authors have not described the specimens examined by them I shall not follow the literature in speaking of the distribution but base my statements on my own observations. In 1905 it was twice taken by the “Thor” west of the Hebrides with 1500 meters wire out; I have seen numerous specimens from the western Mediterranean, from the Atlantic round the Azores and Canary Islands, from various places in the Indian Archipelago and from parts of the Pacific Ocean. To judge from the catches of the “Thor” and of G. H. Fowler (1905) this species is always pelagic in intermediate layers; it never comes near the surface. Remarks. In the paper cited above I have indicated the characteristics of this species which distinguish it from the real &. australis Dana and from another large form as yet unnamed, and also discussed the synonymy. — Adult specimens are as a rule only ca. 27—30 mm. in length, but two specimens of quite unusual size, viz. a female with marsupium 37 mm. long and a male 38 mm., occur amongst the considerable material from the “Ingolf” St. 12. 3. Eucopia sculpticauda Faxon. 1893. Eucopia sculpticauda Faxon, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., Vol. XXIV, p. 218. 11895. — — Faxon, Mem. Mus. Comp. Zool., Vol. XVIII, p. 219, Pl. K, figs. 2, 2d, Pl. LIII, figs. r—1 d. 1905. — — H. J. Hansen, Bull. Mus. Océan. Monaco, no. 30, p. 7, fig. 4. 96 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” has only once taken this species. South-West of Iceland: St. 83: 62° 25’ N. L., 28° 30’ W. L., 912 fm.; 1 spec. Distribution. The “Thor” took a specimen west of the Hebrides: 57° 46'N.L., 9°55’ W. L., young-fish trawl with 1500 meters wire out, thus at a depth of at most 350 to 4oo fm. The species was next known according to the literature from the triangular area between Gibraltar, the Azores and the Canary Islands (Hansen), from the Indian Ocean (Alcock), the Fiji Islands (Ortmann), lastly the Galapagos Islands in the tropical Pacific, the Gulf of Panama and off Central America (Faxon). — It has thus an extensive distribution and must be referred to the mesoplankton like the previous species. B. Suborder Mysida. 4. Hansenomysis Fylle H. J. H. Pl. IV, figs. 4a—4k. 1887. Arctomysis Fylle H. J. Hansen, Vid. Medd. Naturh. Foren. Kjobenhavn, for 1887, p. 210, Tab. VII, Fig. 5—5 1. 1893. Hansenomysis Fylle Stebbing, Intern. Scient. Series, Vol. 74, p. 268. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” has twice taken this species. Davis Straits: St. 35: 65° 16’ N. L., 55° 05’ W. L., 362 fm., temp. 36°; 2 spec. ae et ay Ok BE oe SSP RO! * Se SON eee ee eee eee Further, the “Fylla” has taken it in the Davis Straits, Admiral Wandel and the “Thor” near the Feeroes; the localities are as follows: Davis Straits: 65° 35’ N. L., 54° 50’W. L., 80 fm., stones with Balani; 1 spec. (my type spec.). South-West of the Fzeroes: 61° 15’ N. L., 9° 35’ W. L., 450—500 fm.; 10 spec. — - — 61° 23, — 5°04’ — 255 fm., temp. 0°; 1 spec. Distribution. This form is only known as yet from the localities mentioned. Characteristics of the Species. The genus and species were founded on a single, adult, damaged female; as I now possess fairly good material, additional details to my previous description may be given here. In well-preserved specimens the carapace shows a certain and sometimes very considerable solidity with characteristic, well-marked furrows as represented in fig. 4a. The central two-thirds of the anterior margin seen from above (fig. 4c) is flatly convex, seen from the side considerably bent upwards; each lateral portion forms a tolerably short wing, the anterior lateral margin of which is somewhat oblique, considerably convex above and reaching further forward than the central part of the carapace. Posteriorly the carapace is somewhat emarginate so that the hind upper part of the fifth thoracic segment is uncovered; the sixth and seventh thoracic segments (fig. 4a; VI, VII) are completely uncovered and firmly chitinised. The head projects very considerably forwards in front of the carapace; seen from the side its upper profile is very concave, so that the front end projects strongly forwards and upwards (fig. 4a); seen from above the front end is considerably convex (fig. 4 ¢). CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 97 The eyes (0) are seen along the hinder portion of the lateral margins of the projecting part of the head. Each eye is a short plate, ca. 3 times as broad as long with the concave terminal margin looking obliquely forwards and outwards, and its posterior corner especially is much produced out- wards (fig. 4a); any trace of visual elements is quite lacking. — The peduncle of the antennule is a little shorter and distally a trifle thicker in the males than in the females; in the female (fig. 4c) the three joints decrease slightly in length from behind forwards whilst in the male (fig.4b) the two distal joints are of equal length. In both sexes the outer flagellum seems but slightly longer than the inner one (I have not seen adult specimens with both flagella quite unbroken), and both are fairly short; in the female both flagella are almost of equal thickness, whilst in the male (fig.4b) the 13 proximal joints of the upper, outer flagellum form an extremely thickened portion the distal third of which, however, tapers evenly towards the end. — The squama is between 5 and 6 times as long as broad, tapering outwards with rounded apex, with sete along both margins and further 5 to 6 obvious strong spines distributed along the outer margin. — The telson (fig. 41) reaches very little beyond the inner ramus of the uropods; its lateral margins are almost parallel for barely two-thirds of the length and then the breadth narrows abruptly, each margin being divided into 4 sections of about equal length by 3 small notches each of which has a thick and very long spine; the end which is thus short is flatly rounded and provided with a pair of thick long spines separated by a shorter spine. In front of the second of the very long lateral spines there is a short spine, between the second and third long spines 4—6 smaller spines increasing gradually in length backwards, between the third long lateral spine and the long terminal spine 6 shorter spines increasing gradually in length backwards (fig. 4k)". — The pleopods in the female are as usual unbranched, but they increase greatly in length from before backwards, so that the fourth pair is a little longer than the fifth seg- ment, the fifth pair however but little longer than the sixth segment, which is not much shorter than the two previous segments taken together. In the male all the pleopoda are of about equal length (figs. 4d-—4h), but a little shorter than usual in forms of this suborder and they differ considerably in several points from the usual type. The peduncle increases a little in length from before backwards; the outer ramus is almost similar in all pairs, consisting of a long joint divided obliquely at a little distance from its base and ca. 8 (on the fifth pair) short joints; this portion has two longitudinal rows of fairly short but strong, non-plumose sete. The inner ramus consists on the first pair (fig. 4d) of only a single oblong joint. On the second to the fourth pairs the inner ramus is well-developed and increases a little in length backwards, being on the second pair (fig. 4) a little shorter, on the fourth pair (fig. 4g) a little longer, than the outer ramus; in all three pairs the inner ramus consists of a long, unjointed basal portion and a distal portion divided into 7 or 8 short joints with similar sete as on the outer ramus, but the proximal unjointed portion increases in length from before backwards and on the second pair is a little shorter, on the fourth pair somewhat longer, than the jointed distal portion. On the fifth pair (fig. 4h) the unjointed portion is, however, a little longer than the whole outer ramus and a jointed portion is lacking. Further, the setigerous equipment on the unjointed portion of the inner ramus offers some interest, as almost all the sete are tolerably transparent and t This description of the telson has been based on the males as the telson in all my adult females was greatly mutilated. There is however scarcely any sexual difference in this organ. The Ingo}f-Expedition. III. 2. 13 98 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. comparatively speaking not thin, and are divided into several joints; also the very long sete on the outer margins of the first to the fourth pair and the apical and subapical setee on the fifth pair are placed on protuberances as on a kind of basal support. The characteristic distribution of the setee and the relative position of the setigerous groups on the inner branches can be seen from the figures. The females with marsupium measure 16—17 mm., the males 13 mm. in length. Family Petalophthalmide. — In 1887 I founded this species under the name Arctomysis Fylle n. gen., n. sp. and wrote: “I believe that my new genus should be placed near the genus Petaloph- thalmus Will.Suhm and that these two genera should form together a family by themselves within the order of the Mysidz”. In 1893 Stebbing gave it the name Hansenomysis, as the generic name used by me had been applied by Czerniavsky to a genus which was, however, quite unmaintainable (see below p. 102). In 1895 Faxon described in detail two genera founded by him in 1893 and thus writes: “Petalophthalmus, Scolophthalmus, Hansenomysts, and Ceratomysis, form a natural group of genera characterized by the development of seven pairs of incubatory lamelle in the female (the anterior pair sometimes rudimentary), the absence of an exopod from the maxillipeds, the outgrowth of a large, porrect lobe from the inner margin of the merus of the gnathopods, and the imperfect development of the carapace, which leaves the last two segments of the cephalo-thorax free”. Seven pairs of marsupial lamelle are also found, as Faxon also remarks, in Boreomysis, but in no other genus of this suborder, where only three or fewer pairs of lamellae are met with; on the other hand, the other characters summed up by Faxon are exclusively peculiar to the genera named, which I therefore unite into one family with the title as above". This family further differs from all other genera of the suborder by the great difference existing between the terminal portion of the second to the fourth pair of thoracic legs and that of the fifth to the seven pair, the last three pairs having the seventh joint and the claw fused together to form a long claw, whilst the same parts in the second to the fourth pair are very short and concealed in sete. — The genera of the family further show great agreement with one another in several respects, such as, the carapace has well-marked furrows on it, the outer ramus of the uropods has a very distinct articulation at a little distance from the tip, ete. Of the four genera Petalophthalmus and Ceratomysis have a long, good-sized process from the fourth articulation of the maxillipeds and this process is lacking in the other two genera. Pefaloph- thalmus differs greatly also from the other three genera by the mandibular palp being very much elongated and by the unusually reduced and characteristic pleopoda in the male. I mention this last character as I am acquainted with the hitherto undescribed male of Ceratomysts, and Scolophthalmus is so nearly related to Hansenomysis that the pleopods are probably almost the same in these two genera. Further, the outer branch of the antennules in the male is not thickened in Petalophthalmus, whereas it is greatly thickened in Ceratomysis and as in Hansenomysis and presumably in Scoloph- t In the above-named paper (Fisheries, Ireland, Sci. Invest. 1904, V., [1906]) Holt & Tattersall established this family. and their diagnosis comprises the major part of the features mentioned here by me. But when I received their paper this portion of my manuscript was already translated; for that and other reasons I prefer to alter nothing in my own text, only referring the reader to their paper. I will add, that the family must, of course, bear the name of the authors, as their paper has been published years before mine, and that their diagnosis contains a correct character not pointed out by me, viz. “Inner uropods without otocyst”. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 99 thalmus. Scolophthalmus stands near to Hansenomyszs and seems essentially only to differ from this in that the stalk of the antennules is considerably elongated and the carapace produced into a relatively large rostrum. 5. Boreomysis scyphops G. O. Sars. 1879. Boreomysis scyphops G. O. Sars, Archiv f. Math. og Naturvid., B.IV, p. 429. ! 1885. — G. O. Sars, Norske Nordh.-Exp., Crust. I, p. 56, Pl. VI. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” has taken this species at 13 stations. South of Jan Mayen: St. 113: 69° 31’N. L., 7° 06’ W. L., 1309 fm., temp. + 10°; 17 spec. — - _ - 117: 69° 13' — 8°23) — 1003 — — +10°; 33 — — - — - 118: 68°27 — 8°20' — 1060 — — +10°; 6 — North of East Iceland: St. 125: 68° 08’ — 16°02! — 729 — — +089; 1 — North-East of Iceland: - 112: 67°57' — 6°44’ — 1267 — — +11°3 35 — - - _ - I19: 67°53’ — 10°19) — 1010 — — +1093 5 — — -_ = - 120: 67°29) — 11°32’ — 885 — — +109; 15 — — - — - 111: 67°14 — _ 8° 48" — 80 —- — +099; 9 — — - = - 110: 66°44" — 11°23) — 781 — — +089; 1 — East of North Iceland: - 102: 66°23’ — 10°26 — 750 — — +099; I — — - — - 104: 66°23) — 7°25' — 957 — — +11°; 60 — — - — - 105: 65°34, — 7°3r) — 762 — — +089; 3 — North of the Feroes: - 140: 63°290' — 6°57) — 78 — — +09°; 5 — One specimen was taken by the “Thor” east of Iceland: 66° 19'N.L,, 10° 45’ W.L., 760 fm. Ohlin notes it from a place between East Greenland and Jan Mayen: 72° 42’ N. L., 14° 49' W. L., 1053 fm. — It is easily seen that all the localities lie in the cold area north of the Feroes to the east and north- east of Iceland, also as far north as Jan Mayen and between this island and East Greenland; the depth varied between ca. 760 to 1309 fm., the bottom-temperature between + 08° and + 11°. Distribution. G. O. Sars founded the species on some specimens taken in the waters N. W. of Finmark: 71° 59' N. L., 11° 14' E. L., rr10 fm., temp. + 1°3°. Ohlin gives it from two places considerably further north, namely, 77° 52’ N. L., 3° 5’ W. L., 1455 fm., temp. + 14° and 78° 190! N. L, 8° 41' E. L., 1430 fm., temp. + 14°. In his work on the Schizopods of the “Challenger”, Sars refers a number of specimens taken at 3 stations in the southern Ocean to this species; the stations lie between 46°16’ and 53°55) S.L., the depth varied from 1600 to 1950 fm. and the bottom-temperature was over o°. Being no be- liever in bipolarity I have always supposed that the last-named specimens belong to a different species; besides B. seyphops is not known from any place between the Northern Ocean and the Antarctic Sea, and the bottom-temperature is below zero at all arctic stations, above zero in the antarctic localities. In June 1907 I went to London taking with me some specimens of my B. scyphops for comparison with the antarctic specimens, and the result arrived at will be given presently. Remarks. The largest of my numerous specimens, a female with marsupium, is 60mm. from the tip of the rostrum to the end of the telson. Sars gives 70 mm., but does not state how the measurement was taken; the largest “Challenger” specimens from the Antarctic Sea is given by him 13* 100 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. as 85 mm. measured from the end of the antennal squama to the tip of the telson — not a fortunately chosen measurement. In the British Museum (Natural History) three antarctic specimens determined by Sars are found; the specimen marked “type”, a female with the marsupium scarcely fully developed, measures 54 mm. from the front end of the rostrum to the tip of the telson; the largest of the two other specimens, a female with the marsupium only half developed, measures 58 mm.; the third speci- men is 49 mm. These southern specimens belong to a species very closely allied to, but not identical with, 2B. scyphops, because there is a constant and very pronounced difference in the shape of the eye-cups between the two forms. In the antarctic form, for which I propose the name ZB. distinguenda n. sp. the eye-cup (fig. 2a) is rather oblong, the proportion between height and length (the eye-stalk omitted) being about as 17:25, and the protruding rim is broad, especially at the limit between the Lb Fig. 1. Boreomysis scyphops G. O. Sars, Fig. 2. Boreomysis distinguenda n. sp. I a, right eye, <7; 1 b. right antennal 2a. right eye, < 7; 2b. right antennal squama, slightly more than > 6. squama, >< 62/3, upper and the posterior margin. In ZB. scyphops the eye-cup is relatively flatter and {higher (fig. 1 a) the proportion between height and length being about as 21:26, the protruding rim is narrow, fre- quently even narrower than shown in the figure, and the distal upper lobe at the front margin is often rudimentary. A comparison between fig.1a and fig. 2a will convey a good idea of the difference in outline and excavation of the eye-cups in the two species. Finally the antennal squama is slightly narrower in proportion to length in B. scyphops than in B. distinguenda. It may be added that I have a proportionately large material of Borcomysis from the Arctic Seas, the Atlantic, the Indian Ocean and the Pacific; the material comprises nearly all hitherto established and several undescribed species. Some species are closely allied, and a thorough study is needed in order to avoid mistakes. 6. Boreomysis tridens G. O. Sars. 1870. Boreomysis tridens G. O. Sars, Christiania Vid. Selsk. Forhandl. for 1869, ‘p. 153. ! 1879. — —- Monogr. Norges Mysider, III, p.17, Tab. XIV. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. IOI Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has taken this species at 5 stations. Davis Straits: St. 35: 65° 16’ N. L., 55° 05’ W. L., 362 fm., temp. 36°; 18 spec. ag CoP AG ORS GAS Seo SP TO scetoh | Saas ee eh GBP TT! — * SATE SBR OS" QO! sme A GANS: ne ORR Tae mes Begs Ge West of Iceland: St. 97: 65° 28’ N. L., 27° 39' W. L., 450 fm., temp. 5°5°; I spec. South-West of Iceland: St. 81: 61° 44’ N. L., 27° 00' W. L., 485 fm., temp. 61°; 4 spec. Further, the “Thor” has taken it twice. South-West of the Feroes: 61° 15’ N. L., 9° 35’ W. L., 450—500 fm.; 1 spec. — - _ 61° 08' — 9° 28' — 434 fm.; 15 spec. It appears that the depth was from 362 to 582 fm. and the bottom-temperature considerably over 0°. The species seems to live near the bottom. Distribution. Sars has taken the species at several stations in the West Fjord at Lofoten in depths from 300—400 fm. According to Sars, Norman and Nordgaard it has been taken in several Norwegian fjords from 632/,° to 69?/,° N. L.; the lowest depth was 200 fm. Finally it was three times taken off the west coast of Ireland in 382, 454 and 500 fm. (Holt & Tattersall). Remarks. Sars has only described the female. Amongst the considerable material in my possession are several males; one of the largest (from “Ingolf’ St. 35) measures 31 mm. from tip of rostrum to end of telson. The abdominal legs in the male are essentially as in the same sex of the two following species. 7. Boreomysis nobilis G. O. Sars. 1879. Boreomysis nobilis G. O. Sars, Arch. Math. og Naturv., B. IV, p. 428. ! 1885. — — G.O. Sars, Norske Nordhavs-Exp., Crust. p. 54, Pl. V, figs. 22—28. 1gol. — — A. Ohlin, Bih. K. Sv. Vet-Akad. Handl, B. 27, Afd. IV, No. 8, p. 70, Fig. 3. Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ took this species at the following 6 stations. South of Jan Mayen: St. 116: 70°05’ N. L., 8° 26’ W. L., 371 fm., temp. + 04°; I spec. East of North Iceland: - tor: 66°23 — 12°055 — 537 — — +07°93;1 — —- - - 102: 66°23’ — 10°265 — 750 — — +09°931 — North of the Feeroes: - 139: 63°36’ — 7°30! — 7o2 — — +0693; 1 — — eS - 138: 63°26'5 — 7°56' — 471 — — -+06°; ca. 50 spec. —- - = - I41: 63°22'.— 6°58 — 679 — — -+06°; I spec. Further, it has been taken at the following localities, two of which are on Ohlin’s authority, a third on Vanh6ffen’s. Baffin Bay: 75° 26'N. L., 67° 27’ W. L., 260 fm.; 2 spec. (See Malac. Groenl.). — —: Lille Karajok Fjord, ca. 70° 20’N. L., too fm. (test. Vanh6ffen). — —: 69° 15'N.L., 52°55’ W.L., 265 fm.; 5 spec. (See Malac. Groenl.). — —: Jakobshavn, Traustedt; many specimens. North-West of Iceland: 65° 57’ N. L., 27° oo’ W. L.., 336 fm., temp.o°, Wandel; 1 spec. North of Iceland: 67° 19’ N. L., 17° 55' W. L., 436 fm. Young-fish trawl with 800 met. wire out “Thor” 1904; 2 spec. 102 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. East Greenland: Cape Brewster: 70° 09' N. L., 22° 02’ W. L., 250 fm., 2. Amdrup Exp.; 1 spec. -- a Off Kaiser Franz Joseph Fjord, 132 fm.; several spec. (test. Ohlin). — Entrance of — — 106—158 fm.; 3 spec. (test. Ohlin). North of the Feeroes: 63° 10’ N. L., 7° 31' W. L., 532 fm., Young-fish trawl with 800 met. wire out, “Thor” 1904; I spec. South-East of the Fzeroes: 61° 23’ N. L., 4° 21’ W. L., 505 fm., temp. + 04°, Wandel; 1 spec. We see that wherever the bottom-temperature was given, it was 0° or as a rule under 0°; the probability is that the 4 localities in Baffin Bay had the same temperature and for all the others it is certain that the bottom-temperature was negative. But the “Thor” has twice taken it in the young- fish trawl at a depth scarcely over 200 fm., whilst the waters at both places were more than twice this depth; whether these specimens were taken in water under or yet very near 0° cannot be deter- mined. Future investigations must settle, however, whether the species belongs as a rule to the mesoplankton or lives near the bottom. Distribution. Outside the area specially dealt with here, only the full-grown male on which Sars founded the species has hitherto been taken and came from 79° 59’ N.L., 5° 40’ E. L., 459 fm., temp. + 1°. Remarks. The largest specimen, an adult male from “Ingolf’ Stat. 116, is 51 mm. from tip of rostrum to end of telson; the female is somewhat smaller, one of my largest specimens (from “Ingolf” Stat. 138) being only 42°5 mm. long; Ohlin gives the length of his largest female from East Greenland as 49 mm. 8. Boreomysis arctica Kroyer. 1861. Mysis arctica Kroyer, Naturh. Tidsskr. 3. R., B. I, p. 34, Tab. I, Fig. 5a—f. ! 1879. Boreomysis arctica G. O. Sars, Monogr. Norg. Mysider, III, p. 10, Tab. XI—XIII. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” has not taken this species, but it is present from other sources. Kroyer founded it on a specimen from West Greenland, but the locality is unknown; it was taken later on the same coast in Lille Karajok Fjord, ca. 70° 20’ N. L., 100 fm. by Dr. E. Vanhdffen. In 1904 the “Thor” took a number of specimens south-west of the Feeroes: 61°15! N. L., 9° 35’ W. L., 450—500 fm. Distribution. The species is also known from Norway, where it was taken by G. O. Sars in Christiania Fjord, Hardanger Fjord and at Lofoten; concerning its bathymetric occurrence he writes that he had never met it “before at a depth of 200 fm. whereas in Hardanger Fjord it goes down right to 400 fm.” Nordgaard notes it from West Finmark and says: “There can, however, hardly be any room for doubt that it has planktonic habits, as it has several times been taken by townetting”. It has also been taken in the Skager Rak (Internat. Explor.) and west of Ireland at depths of 181 to 382 fm. (Holt & Tattersall), at the east coast of America at ca. 40° N. L., 500 fm. (S. I. Smith), lastly in the western Mediterranean near Capri (Lo Bianco). Remarks. Czerniavsky is doubly incorrect in basing a new genus, Arcfomysis, on this species of Kroyer and in considering it as different from Sars’ form. ‘The thoracic “tarsi” have in reality, as Sars states, only 3 joints, but there are further more or less distinct traces of other two similar “false” articulations, and it is these which Kroyer indicated as really existing articulations, The generic CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 103 character of Arcfomysis thus falls to the ground; the species of Kroyer and Sars are identical, which has also been accepted by Sars himself and by several other observers. 9. Boreomysis microps G. O. Sars. 1883. Boreomysis microps G. O. Sars, Forh. Vid. Selsk. Christiania for 1883, No. 7, p. 35. 1885. — — G.O. Sars, Challenger Rep., Zool., Vol. XIII, p. 185, Pl. XX XIII, figs. 7—10. ! 1905. ~~ subpellucida H. J. Hansen, Bull. Mus. Océan. Monaco, No. 30, p. 8, figs. 5—8. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” has not found this species but it was taken by the “Thor” in 1904 at the following localities. West of Iceland: 65° 00' N. L., 28° 10’ W. L., 1240 m., Young-fish trawl, 1000 m. wire out; many spec. — - — 65°20' — 27° 121/,'— 740m, _ — 810m. — 6 spec. — - + 65°27' — 27°10'/,'— 763m, — — 800m. —- 2 South of — 61°34’ — 19°05) — 2160m., — — 1800m. —- FJ — - — 61°30' — 17°08 — ee. — — 1800m. — many spec. — - — 62°47) — 15°03' — I950m., - — 1000m. — __ I spec. South-West of the Fzeroes: 61° 08’ N. L,, 9° 28’ W. L., 820 m., Young-fish trawl, at bottom; 1 spec. Distribution. The species was founded on a specimen taken south of Nova Scotia: 62°8'N. L., 63° 390 W. L., 1250 fm. The “Thor” has taken it 3 times in the waters west of the Hebrides with the young-fish trawl, 1500 meters wire out. It was next taken to the west of Ireland in townets from 1150 to o fm. (Holt & Tattersall), also at several places south of the Azores in the vertical net sunk to 1640—1770 fm., once to 820 fm. (Hansen). The species thus belongs to the mesoplankton and as a rule is scarcely met with before ca. 200 fm. down, but how deep it penetrates is naturally unknown. Remarks. In my paper cited, I founded a new species B. subpellucida, as the numerous specimens I had differed considerably from Sars’ descriptions and figures in some characteristics. Thus Sars has neither mentioned nor figured the very distinct process on the upper side of the eye-stalks close behind the cornea, also the proximal part of the telson is considerably narrower in relation to its length than in my specimens. Later Mr. Holt examined Sars’ type preserved in the British Museum and writes (in 1906): “The fact is that in so far as the diagnosis of B. microps differs from that of 2B. subpellucida, the former is erroneous”; consequently he withdraws &. swbpelluctda as a synonym to B. microps. My own examination of Sars’ type in 1906 gave the same result. A large female with marsupium (from 65° N. L.) measures 20 mm. from tip of rostrum to end of telson; a male from 61'/, N. L. is 195 mm. long. 10. Longithorax fuscus n. sp. Pl. V. figs. 1a—tro. Description of the Genus. As the description of the genus is founded on a single somewhat damaged female, in which the marsupium is not fully developed, this diagnosis is not quite complete’. t I had established a new genus on the present form before Dr. G., Illig’s preliminary note on the “Valdivia” Mysi- dacea was published. Consequently I accepted the generic name Longithorax proposed by him for an allied species, but I did not alter anything in the descriptions of the genus or the species. 104 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA, The genus is obviously different from all other hitherto known Mysidacea in having the last thoracic segment (at least in the female) very elongated; dorsally it is not much shorter than the two first abdominal segments taken together whilst ventrally it is even considerably longer than dorsally; the seventh pair of thoracic legs are inserted at its front margin. The carapace is tolerably short, deeply incised posteriorly, so that the central portion of the penultimate thoracic segment is uncovered; its lateral wings reach a little beyond the front margin of the last segment. The left mandible (fig. 1 f) has the pars incisiva well developed, its /acinza mobilis has a large and strong cusps incised at the end, whilst behind this there is only a pair of weaker setee; the Jars modaris is slightly marked, small and weakly developed; the whole margin from the base of the casfzs to the posterior end of the Jars molaris is furnished with fine hairs. The lobe of the second joint of the maxille (fig. 1h) is rounded, with no protuberance, that on the third joint is cleft, the last joint of the palp unusually long, and the greater part of the under side of this joint and of the lobes are densely covered with hairs. The second joint of the maxillipeds (fig.1i) is long with a small but distinct lobe, the third very short with a similar lobe, the 4 following joints with inconsiderable difference in length but decreasing out- wards in breadth, so that the two last are fairly narrow. The first thoracic leg (fig. 1k) has the second joint in the form of a large plate as broad as long; the rest of the leg is slender, the sixth joint somewhat shorter than the fifth, the claw well-developed. The other thoracic legs, which increase somewhat in length from before backwards, are very slender (fig. 1m) except as regards the second joint, which is a large and broad plate; the sixth joint is considerably longer than the fifth without oblique articulation, but its shorter distal part is separated as a distinct joint by a well-developed, vertical articulation; the seventh joint and the claw are well-developed. The exopodite on the thoracic legs (fig. 11) has the subbasal joint large and unusually broad, plate-like (the exopod of the maxilli- peds was broken off), Antennze and tail-fan almost as in Meterythrops. It will be seen from these characteristics, that the genus must be placed in the Avrythrops- group, showing in a number of characters considerable agreement with J/eferythrops, but there are differences more or less in all the appendages described above in detail. Description of the Species. As there is only the mentioned incompletely developed speci- men to hand, only the carapace, eyes, antennal scale and caudal process will be described here, the other characters can be learnt from the description of the genus and the figures. The front end of the carapace, seen from above (fig.1c), is triangular, with median angle a little over go°, but the very tip is produced in a very small process which is somewhat smaller than the process on the eye-stalks. The eyes are yellowish and moderately small; seen from the side (fig. 1 b) they look downwards a little and occupy the end of the eye-stalks in a flattened arch; seen from above (fig.1c) they appear as a narrow band at the end of the stalk and are no broader than this; above and close behind the eye at its centre the stalk has a protruding, distally rounded process which projects forward over the eye. The squama (fig. 1d) is moderately small, three times as long as broad; its smooth outer margin is but little more than twice as long as the breadth, whilst the setigerous terminal margin is very oblique and the distal outer corner has a short tooth. The outer ramus of the uropoda (fig. rn) is defective, but nevertheless much longer than the inner branch, and to judge from the serrulation the margins have undoubtedly been covered with sete over along CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. I05 almost their whole length; the sense organ in the inner ramus is moderately small, but distinct. The telson has almost the same form as in Parerythrops abyssicola G.O.S.; it is moderately short, reaching scarcely behind the centre of the inner ramus. The lateral margins are convex along the proximal third of their length, distinctly concave and converging considerably backwards in their distal two- thirds; the transverse terminal margin (fig. 10) is very short with 4 very long spines, the outer pair of which is shorter and a little thinner than the inner (one spine of the inner pair is lost and the other also for a smaller or greater part broken off); the distal part of the lateral margin has 5 small spines. (The hindmost pair of marsupial lamellz are fairly small, evidently not fully developed; the lamellz of the sixth pair of thoracic legs are very small, and there are none from the fifth pair). — Length from rostrum to end of telson 17°5 mm. The specimen preserved in formalin was of a dark greyish brown colour when received. Locality. The specimen described was taken by the “Thor” on July 11 1904 at the fol- lowing place: South of Iceland: 61° 30' N. L., 17° 08’ W. L., Young-fish trawl with 1800 meters wire out. Distribution. According to a kind letter from W. M. Tattersall a specimen measuring 25 mm. in length was captured near the middle of June 1906 at 49° 27'N. L., 13° 33'W.L. in the young- fish trawl with 2800 m. of wire out; the depth of sea was 2600 m. u. Erythrops serrata G. O. Sars. 1863. Nematopus serratus G. O. Sars, Nyt Mag. for Naturv., B. XII, p. 235. ! 1870. Erythrops serrata G. O. Sars, Mon. Norges Mysider, I, p. 27, Tab. II, Fig. 1—12. 1892. — — Norman, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Ser. 6, Vol. X, p. 162, Pl. X, figs. rz. Occurrence. This species was only taken by the “Thor”, which found it at the following places. South of Iceland: 63° 46' N. L., 22° 56’ W. L., 70 fm.; large number of specimens. — - — 63°15’ — 22°23' — 114—172 fm.; 8 spec. — - — 63° 18) — 21°30 — 94 fm.; 15 spec. Distribution. The “Thor” has taken it north-east of the Shetlands, 85 fm. and in the North Sea east of Scotland, 47 fm. It is noted from Shetland, 40—60 fm. (Norman), Fair Island, 60—80 fm. (Th. Scott), from several places on the east coast of Scotland (Norman, Th. Scott), from the Irish Sea (Holt & Tattersall) and west coast of Ireland, 80—293 fm. (Norman, Holt & Tattersall). Further, it has twice been taken in the Skager Rak at some distance from Jutland in 49 and 70 fm. (Metzger, Meinert). In Norway it is distributed from Christiania Fjord to West Finmark, usually in depths from 80 to 200 fm., but in 30—4o fm. in the inner parts of Christiania Fjord. 12. Erythrops abyssorum G. O. Sars. 1869. Erythrops abyssorum G. O. Sars, Nyt Mag. for Naturv., B. XVI, p. 326. ! 1870. -- — G. O. Sars, Mon. Norges Mysider, I, p. 36, Tab. V, Fig. 1—12. Occurrence, The “Ingolf’ has not taken this species and it has not been brought home by any. Dane from the region in question here, so that it is only included from the literature. The Ingolf-Expedition. III. 2. 14 106 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. It was taken at West Greenland in Karajok Fjord, ca. 70° 20'N.L., 100 fm. (Vanhéffen). At East Greenland it has been taken at 72° 28’ N.L., 21° 48’ W.L., 95 fm. (Ohlin) and somewhat further from the same coast at 72°25'N.L,., 17°56’ W.L., 158 fm. (Ohlin). Finally, it was taken near Jan Mayen, 195 fm. (G. O. Sars). Distribution. The species is known from Christiania Fjord and from a number of fjords along the northern half of Norway from Lofoten to Varanger Fjord (Sars, Norman, Nordgaard); the depths varied from ca. 106 to 300 fm. Lastly, it was taken in the Kara Sea at depths from 51 to 67 fm. (Hansen). 13. Erythrops erythrophthalma Goés. 1864. Mysis erythrophthalma Goés, Ofv. Kgl. Sv. Vet-Akad. Férh,, Arg. 20, p. 178. ! 1870. Erythrops Goésii G. O. Sars, Mon. Norges Mysider, I, p. 24, Tab. I. 1870. — — Norman, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist, Ser. 6, Vol. X, p. 160. Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has not taken this species. It is mentioned from Karajok Fjord, ca. 70° 20'N. L. on the west coast of Greenland, 26 fm. (Vanh6ffen). At Jan Mayen 2 specimens were taken by the 24 Amdrup Expedition in 50—6o fm. Distribution. It has been taken on the east coast of Scotland in the Firth of Forth (Norman), in the North Sea at least as far south as 55° 8’ N.L. (Ehrenbaum), in the Skager Rak (Metzger), at a number of places along the whole coast of Norway from Christiania Fjord to Varanger Fjord (Lovén, G. O. Sars, Norman), at Spitzbergen (Goés, Ohlin), the White Sea and Murman Sea (Jarzynsky), Ma- totschkin Skar and Kara Sea (Stuxberg — it should be added, however, that I am not sure of the correctness of the last two authors’ determinations). Lastly, it has also been taken in Cape Cod Bay on the east coast of North America (S. I. Smith). It is found as a rule at depths from 30 to 125 fm. Lo Bianco gives it as having been taken at some places in the Mediterranean in quite 500—600 fm., but I think the specimens have been wrongly determined. 14. Erythrops glacialis G. O. Sars. 1877. Erythrops glacialis G. O. Sars, Arch. Math. og Naturv., B. II, p. 342. ! 1885. — — G,O. Sars, Norske Nordhavs-Exp., Crust. I, p. 45, Pl. V, Fig. 1-4. Occurrence. This species, which I have never seen, is taken from Ohlin, who notes it from East Greenland, off Kaiser Franz Joseph Land, 132 fm. Distribution. The species is further only known from two places west of the middle of Norway in the cold area; the depths were 350 and 408 fm. (G. O. Sars). 15. Meterythrops robusta S. I. Smith. 1879. Meterythrops robusta S. I. Smith, Transact. Conn. Acad., Vol. V., p. 93, Pl. XII, figs. 1—2. ! — Parerythrops — G.O.Sars, Mon. Norges Mysider, III, p. 98, Tab. XXXIX. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” has twice taken this species. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 107 Davis Straits: St. 31: 66° 35’ N. L., 55° 54’ W. L., 88 fm., temp. 16°; 1 spec. = _ - 29: 65°34, — 54°3r' — 68 — — O2%;1 — Ohlin gives it from East Greenland: 74° 35’ N. L., 18° 15’ W. L., 79 fm. Distribution. The species, which was founded on specimens from Massachusetts Bay and Gulf of St. Lawrence in depths of 33 and 50—7o fm. has according to the literature an extensive distribution. It has been taken on the west coast of Norway at ca. 67!/,N.L. and at several places on its north coast (Bodo, Porsanger Fjord, Varanger Fjord) in 60—150 fm. (G. O. Sars). Further, it was met with near the southern end of Spitzbergen in 146 fm., temp. + 11° (G. O. Sars); finally, in the Kara Sea, 64 fm. (Hansen). The bottom-temperature everywhere has been either negative or very low positive. — Holt and Tattersall’s determination of it from the west coast of Ireland rests, according to information kindly sent by the authors, on a confusion of names with Parerythrops obesa G. O. Sars. 16. Meterythrops picta Holt & Tatt. 1905. Meterythrops picta, Holt & Tattersall, Rep. Sea and Inland Fisheries of Ireland, 1902—03, Pt. II, App. no. IV, p. 116 & 143, Pl. XIX, figs. 5—7, Pl. XXV, figs. 8—9. Occurrence. This species was only taken by the “Thor”, which found it at the 5 following localities within our area. West of Iceland: 65° 08’ N. L., 28° 10’ W. L., 1240 m., Young-fish trawl, 800 m. wire out; 1 spec. — - _ 65°10! — 27° 12!/,.' — peter 01 — — 740 m. — I — South- — 61°34’ — 19°05’ — 2160 m,, — — 1800 m. -- I — —- — 61°30 — 17°08’ — ? m, — — 1800 m. —- 4- South-West of the Fzeroes: 60°00! N. L,, 10°35’ W. L., 1015 m., Young-fish trawl, rooo m. wire out; I spec. Distribution. The “Thor” has also taken this species twice west of the Hebrides in the young-fish trawl with 1500 meters wire out. It was founded on a single specimen taken west of Ire- land in a net sunk to the bottom, 382 fm. — All the 7 localities of the “Thor” show, that the species belongs to the mesoplankton, the young-fish trawl fishing in 180 to 450 fm. Remarks. This beautiful species is extremely easily recognised. An adult male measures 124 mm. 17. Parerythrops obesa G. O. Sars. 1864. Nematopus obesus G. O. Sars, Nyt Mag. for Naturv., B. XV, p. 258. : ! 1870. Parerythrops obesa G. O. Sars, Mon. Norges Mysider, I, p. 41, Tab. II. Occurrence. The species has only once been taken by the “Thor” at the following locality. South of Iceland: 63° 5' N. L., 20° 7’ W. L., 295 fm.; several specimens. Distribution. The species occurs along the Norwegian coast from Christiania Fjord to West Finmark, 50—300 fm. (G. O. Sars; Nordgaard). Further, it was taken west and south-west of Ireland (Holt & Tattersall, who discuss its bathymetric occurrence in 1905). Lo Bianco gives it from some places in the Mediterranean in depths of quite 500 to over 600 fm., but this determination until further information is forthcoming must be regarded as uncertain. 14* 108 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 18. Parerythrops spectabilis G. O. Sars. 1877. Parerythrops spectabilis G. O. Sars, Arch. for Math. og Naturv., B. II, p. 343. ! 1885. a — G. O. Sars, Norske Nordhavs-Exp., Crust. I, p. 47, Pl. V, Fig. 5—12. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” has once taken this species. North-West of the Feeroes: St. 138: 63° 26'N. L., 7°56’ W. L., 471 fm., temp. + 06°; 1 spec. It is given from West Greenland: Karajok Fjord, ca. 70° 20'N.L. (Vanhdéffen). It was taken by the North-Atlantic Expedition south-west of Jan Mayen: 70° 41'N.L,., 10° 10’ W. L,., 263 fm. temp. + 03°. Ohlin gives it from East Greenland, north of Kaiser Franz Joseph Fjord, 132 fm.; and from 74° 52'N. L., 17° 16' W. L., 185 fm. Distribution. The species is otherwise known only from a place in the cold area, namely, off Norway at 63° 10'N.L,, 417 {m., temp. + 10° (G. O. Sars). It has thus been taken at only 6 localities in all, probably all with negative bottom-temperature. 19. Amblyops abbreviata M. Sars. 1869. Pseudomma abbreviatum M. Sars, Forh. Vid. Selsk. Christiania f. 1868, p. 262 (without description). 1869. Amblyopsis abbreviata G. O. Sars, Nyt Mag. for Naturv., B. XVI, p. 328. ! 1872. Amblyops abbreviata G. O. Sars, Mon. Norges Mysider, II, p. 5, Tab. VI. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” has taken this species once. Davis Straits: St. 35: 65° 16’ N. L., 55°05’ W. L., 362 fm., temp. 3°6°; 3 spec. According to the Malac. Groenl. it was taken by the “Fylla” in the Davis Straits: 65° 35’ N. L,, 54° 50’ W. L., 80 fm. It was found by the “Thor” south of Iceland; 63° 46' N. L., 22° 56’ W. L., 79 fm.; 2 spec. Distribution. Otherwise it is known from Norway, where it has been taken at a number of localities from Christiania Fjord to Vardo in depths from 1oo to 300 fm. (G.O. Sars). Besides it has been taken three times west of Ireland, in depths from 337 to 454 fm. (Holt & Tattersall). 20. Amblyops n. sp. = A. Crozetii Ohlin not Sars. Occurrence. According to Ohlin it was taken between East Greenland and Jan Mayen: 72° 42'N.L,, 14° 49' W. L., 1058 fm., 5 specimens. Remarks. QOhlin (l.c, p.74) does not describe the 5 specimens mentioned, which he refers to the A. Crozetit G.O.S. taken at 46° 16'N.L,. in the Southern Ocean; he says he is only able to find “very slight differences in a few respects” between Sars’ description and figures of this southern species and his own arctic specimens. As I believe, at any rate until further information is forthcoming, that the form taken off East Greenland must be specifically distinct from A. Crozetit, I have preferred to give the arctic form as a new species without however giving it any name. 21. Paramblyops rostrata Holt & Tatt. 1905. Paramblyops rostrata Holt & Tattersall, Rep. Sea and Inland Fisheries of Ireland, 1902—1903, Pt. II, App. no. IV, p. 125 and 144, Pl. XXI. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 109 Occurrence. Hitherto this species has only once been taken by the “Thor”. South-West of the Feroes: 61° 15’ N. L., 9° 35’ W. L., 450—500 fm.; 4 spec. Distribution. Hitherto only known from localities. west of Ireland where it was taken several times in depths from 180 to 382 fm. (Holt & Tattersall). 22. Pseudomma roseum G. O. Sars. PL V, fig. 2a—2b. 1870. Pseudomma roseum G. O. Sars, Forh. Vid. Selsk. Christiania £ Aar 1869, p. 154. ! 1870. _ — G.O. Sars, Mon. Norges Mysider, I, p. 54, Tab. IV. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” has twice taken this species. Davis Straits: St. 35: 65° 16’ N. L., 55° 05’ W. L., 362 fm., temp. 36°; I spec. ~ mee erage Ga 540 GRP BOY ea ge mm 874 It has also been obtained at other localities; at the first named it was taken by Admiral Wandel, at the others by the “Thor”. Davis Straits: 66° 49' N. L., 56° 28’ W. L., 235 fm., temp. 4°4°; I spec. South of Iceland: 63° 05’ N. L., 20° 07' W. L., 300 fm.; 5 spec. South-West of the Feroes: 61° 15’ N. L., 9° 35’ W. L., 450—500 fm.; 9 spec. — - o 61°08’ — 9°28 — 434 fm.; 3 spec. Distribution. As P frigidum n. sp. has to be separated as a distinct species from P. roseum, the distribution offers some difficulties, as Sars has mixed the two species and it is not always possible to determine with certainty to which of them the specimens from certain of the localities mentioned in the literature have belonged. It is certainly this species, which Sars has had before him from localities on southern and western Norway up to West Finmark, roo—450 fm. The specimens mentioned by S. I. Smith as taken at New England, at ca. 40° N.L., 500 fm. and in the Gulf of Maine, 105 fm., probably belong to this species likewise, and it is not unlikely that his specimens taken in the Gulf ' of St. Lawrence in r10 and 210 fm. also belong here. Specimens given from distinctly arctic localities all belong probably to P. /rigidum and are mentioned under that species. Holt & Tattersall’s state- ment in 1905 of the occurrence of P. vosewm in localities west of Ireland has arisen from an error which the authors corrected in their subsequent paper published in 1906. 23. Pseudomma frigidum un. sp. Pl. V, fig. 3 a—3 b. Description. Stands extremely near to P. voseum, but is much larger, the adult female of the latter species being only ca. 15 mm. long whilst two females of P. frigidwm (from “Ingolf” St. 138) measure 25:2 mm. from the anterior edge of the eye-plate to the end of the telson; the single male I have is 23 mm. But the species may be even larget, as Ohlin gives 28 mm. for the female, 24 mm. for the male. The eye-plate (fig. 3a) is almost as in P. roseum, but the serrulation is a little less developed. The antennal squama (fig. 3b) offers a prominent characteristic: the smooth part of the 110 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. outer edge to the tip of the marginal spine is but little less than twice as long as the oblique setigerous distal edge measured to the base of the marginal spine, whereas in P. vosewm the smooth outer edge is only 3/, times longer than the setigerous distal edge. The telson almost as in P. roseum., Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has once taken the species. North-West of the Feeroes: St. 138: 63° 26’ N. L., 7° 56’ W. L., 471 fm., temp. + 06°; 8 specimens. The Ryder expedition has also taken a single specimen, a male, south of Jan Mayen: 70° 32'N.L., 8° 10. W.L., 470 fm. Ohlin gives P. roseum from 3 localities at East Greenland, namely, in Franz Joseph Fjord, off the same fjord, and at 74° 30'N.L., 18° 4o'W.L., depths from 42—53 fm. and down to 132 fm.; as the localities are distinctly arctic and his specimens, as mentioned above, agree with P. frigidum in size, it is undoubtedly this species and not P. vosewm which he has had in his hands. Distribution. G. O. Sars in the Norwegian North-Atlantic Expedition mentions his having had unusually large specimens of P. rosewm from two localities in the cold area: the one of these at 63° 10'N. L. off Norway, depth 417 fm., temp. + 10°, the other is given as from “the tract of Ocean south-west of Jan Mayen (Stat. 251)” — but some error must have crept in here as Stat. 251 lies off Lofoten (depth 634 fm., temp. + 13°). The specimens from these two localities have certainly been P. frigidum. Further, I am inclined to believe that Stuxberg’s determination, Matotschkin Shar, 60—70 fm., should also be relegated to this species. 24. Pseudomma affine G. O. Sars. 1870. Pseudomma affine G. O. Sars, Forh. Vid. Selsk., Christiania, Aar 1869, p. 156. ! 1872. — — G.O. Sars, Mon. Norges Mysider, II, p. 57, Tab. V, Fig. 13—22. ! 1906. — — Holt & Tattersall, Fisheries, Ireland, Sci. Invest., 1904, V. p. 27, Pl. III, figs. 1-6. Occurrence. The species has only been taken by the “Thor”, at the following locality. South-West of the Feeroes: 61° 08’ N. L.., 9° 28’ W. L., 434 fm.; many specimens. Distribution. It has been taken in the north of western Norway up to Lofoten, 100—200 fim. (G. O. Sars). Has further been trawled by the “Thor” in the North Sea at 58° 32'N.L., 4°18 E.L., 148 fm., and several times west of Ireland in depths from 120 to 500 fm. (Holt & Tattersall). Lo Bianco states that he has seen specimens taken at 3 places in depths of over 500 and 600 fm. in the Mediter- ranean, but I greatly doubt the correctness of his determination. Remarks. As shown by Sars, the eye-plate in the females is produced forwards in a cleft process, by means of which they are easily known from P. voseum, but on the other hand the extent of the marginal serrulation does not agree with Sars’ description, as in my specimens the posterior part of the lateral margin is smooth, so that the serrulated part is not much longer than in P. roseum, whereas according to Sars the serrulation in P. affine reaches to behind the lateral corner. The telson in my specimens shows an intermediate stage between Sars’ figures of P. roseum and P. affine, its posterior margin being less broad than in the latter and with 3, at most 4, pairs of spines. Never- theless I consider that my specimens, especially on account of the form of the eye-plate at the centre of its anterior margin, must be referred to P. affine G. O. 5S. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. III 25. Pseudomma truncatum S. I. Smith. 1879. Pseudomma truncatum S$. I. Smith, Trans. Conn. Acad. Vol. V, p. 99, Pl. XI, figs. 3, 4. ! 1870. - — G. O. Sars, Mon. Norges Mysider, III, p. 102, Pl. XL. Occurrence. Was once taken by the “Ingolf”. North of Iceland: St. 128: 66° 50'N. L., 20° 02' W. L., 194 fm., temp. 06°; 1 spec. It is also noted from Karajok Fjord, West Greenland, at 70° 20'N.L., 102 fm. (Vanh6ffen). Distribution. The species was founded on specimens taken in the Gulf of St. Lawrence in depths from 45 to 70 fm.; Sars gives it from Varanger Fjord, 150 fm. from a point south of Spitz- bergen, 267 fm., temp. + 11° and from another west of Spitzbergen, 125 fm., temp. 19°. It is further known from the Kara Sea, 51 fm. (Hansen), and is noted from Behring Sea (Richters), but though the last-named locality is not improbable, the correctness ought to be confirmed. 26. Pseudomma Théeli Ohlin. 1go1. Pseudomma Théeli A. Ohlin, Bih. Kgl. Sv. Vet-Akad. Handl. B. 27, Afd. IV, no. 8, p. 78, Fig. 5. Occurrence. This species is as yet only known from the two type-specimens taken at “East Greenland, Franz Joseph Fjord, entrance of Musk-ox Fjord, depth 220 m.” (116 fm.). 27. Pseudomma parvum VanhoOffen. PL. V, fig. 4a—4h. 1897. Pseudomma parvum E. Vanhoffen, Drygalski’s Grénland-Expedition, p. 199. ! 1907. — — Zool. Jahrb. Abth. fiir Systematik, B. XXV, p. 508, Taf. 20, Fig. 1—3. Description. This description! is founded on 2 specimens, a fine, egg-carrying female and a somewhat mutilated male, both most kindly placed at my disposal by the founder of the species. Anterior margin of eye-plate taken as a whole (fig. 4a) is somewhat strongly convex, but in the centre there is a fairly slight inbending, angular at its base though a median narrow cleft is absent; further, the margin is somewhat concave for a considerable distance about half way between the median line and the lateral corner, whilst its lateral portion is very convex. The upper surface and anterior margin of the eye-plate under a magnification of quite 100 times show a number of small, conical protuberances and a quantity of fine hairs of the same length, further a somewhat larger tubercle directed forwards and upwards near the anterior margin a little distance from the median line. The front margin of the carapace under the lateral corner of the eye-plate is regularly and moderately strongly serrulated for a part of its length. — The antennal squama (fig. 4 b) is almost as in P. Théeli, a little over five times as long as broad; almost two-thirds of the terminal margin is somewhat convex whilst the remaining third is the base for the process at the outer margin, which is specially large, both broad and thick at the root and extending far out over the distal edge; the setee along the inner margin are extremely long, the longest indeed being but little shorter than the t My description and drawings had been made a long time before Dr. Vanhéffen published his more detailed account of this species. I12 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. squama. The last joint of the mandibular palp (fig. 4c) is comparatively much broader and somewhat shorter than in P. roseum, and distinctly triangular. In the maxillipeds (fig.4d) the 5‘ to 7 joints especially are somewhat broader than in P. rosewm, the 5 besides obviously shorter than in this species. The 2™4 joint of the first pair of legs has on its underside distally a distinct, thick, rounded protuberance and proximally a smaller one; the whole leg (fig. 4) is somewhat thicker and shorter than in P. roseum, the 5 and 6 joints especially being shorter; the proximal part of the exopod is very broad. In the female the 4" and 5 pair of abdominal appendages (fig. 4f) especially are obviously longer than in P. roseum, the 4" pair being a little longer than the 5" segment, the 5‘ pair even a little longer than the long 6 segment. The inner branch of the uropods (fig. 4g) reaches quite as far backwards as the outer branch, whereas in P. vosewm it is considerably shorter than the latter. The telson (fig. 4h) is somewhat longer and narrower than in P. rvosewm; its end in my single specimen with the tail-fan well preserved is broad and somewhat flatly rounded with 3 pairs of long spines of equal length, whilst ciliated setae could not be detected; on each lateral margin are 5 to 6 spines. — Length of an ovigerous female 13 mm. Remarks. This species is widely separated by the structural characters mentioned from all the foregoing except P. 7héeli to which it stands near especially in the form of the squama, the last joint of the mandibular palps and the comparatively plump maxillipeds and first pair of legs. But P. Théeli according to Ohlin is 20 mm. long, thus much larger, its eye-plate shows quite a different form and its telson is somewhat longer in relation to its breadth. Occurrence. West Greenland: Karajok Fjord, ca. 70° 20’ N. L., 100 fm., Vanhdffen. 28. Mysidopsis didelphys Norm. 1863. Mysidopsis didelphys Norman, Trans. Tyneside Natur. Field Club, Vol. V, p. 270, Pl. XII, figs. g—11 (teste Norman). ! 1872. Mysidopsis didelphys G. O. Sars, Mon. Norges Mysider, II, p. 20, Tab. VII. Occurrence. Only twice taken by the “Thor”. South of Iceland: 63° 46'N. L., 22° 56’ W. L., 80 fm.; ca. 15 spec. —- - — 63°18’ — 21°30' — 94 —; 2 spec. Distribution. It is known from the Shetlands, both coasts of Scotland and north-east Eng- land, 40—70 fm. (Norman, Th. Scott), west of Ireland in depths from a little over 50 to 199 fm. (Holt & Tattersall), also Skager Rak N. E. from the north point of Jutland, 110 fm. (Meinert) and Norway from Christiania Fjord to Lofoten, 30—150 fm. (G. O. Sars). 29. Pseudomysis abyssi G. O. Sars. PL V, fig. 5a—5 d. 1879. Pseudomysis abyssi G. O. Sars, Arch. Math. og Naturv., IV, p. 430. ! 1885. — — G.O. Sars, Norske Nordhavs-Exp., Crust. I, p. 50, Pl. V, Fig. 13—21, Pl. XX, Fig. 18—20. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 113 Occurrence. Taken three times by the “Ingolf”. South of Jan Mayen: St. 113: 69° 31'N.L,, 7° 06' W. L., 1309 fm., temp. + 10°; 3 spec. wa Ge a ». 3272 69% 43) = — RR ag 00g I OC T0!S North-East of Iceland: - rio: 66° 44' — 11°33’) — FOE ae 6 ei OBST Distribution. Sars had 2 specimens, both taken between North Cape and Jan Mayen, the one at 72° N. L,, in 1110 fm., temp. + 1°3°, the other in the stomach of Rhodichthys regina from 72° 36' N. L,, 1280 fm., temp. + 1°4°. Ohlin had a fragment from 78° 19’ N. L., 8° 41' E. L., 1428 fm., temp. + 14°. The species thus dwells in considerable depths with low to very low temperatures, always negative, in the Northern Ocean between Iceland, East Greenland, Spitzbergen and Norway. 'Remarks. A small addition to Sars’ (and Ohlin’s supplementary) description may be given here. My best specimens are from St. 117; the one of these is a female with marsupium measuring ca. 45 mm. from the tip of the rostrum to the end of the telson, whilst a male is 42 mm. long. The eye-stalks differ a little in form; the most distal part is sometimes more developed than Sars gives it, in form like a conical process pointing forwards (fig. 5a). — The female has 3 pairs of marsupial lamellee, the first pair small. — The pleopods of the male resemble in most features those in AZyszdezs insignis G. O.S.; on the first pair (fig. 5b) the outer branch is but little longer than that of the fourth pair, whilst the inner branch (fig. 5c) is very short (yet by comparison considerably larger than in JZ. imsignis), oblong-eggshaped, distally broadly rounded, with the usual basal side-process on the outer margin. The II"*—IV" pairs are almost the same both in form and length of rami; in the IV" (fig. 5d) the exopod is but little longer than the endopod, but the penultimate joint half as long again as the antepenultimate, and there are no thick terminal setee with hairs covering the one side as in WZ. insignis. 30. Mysideis insignis G. O. Sars. 1864. Mysis insignis G. O. Sars, Nyt Mag. for Naturv., B. XIII, p. 245. ! 1879. Mysideis insignis G. O. Sars, Mon. Norges Mysider, III, p. 2, Tab. IX—X. Occurrence. Only once taken by the “Thor”. ; South of Iceland: 63° 15'N. L., 22° 23’ W. L., 114—172 fm.; ca. Io spec. Distribution. The species has been taken in Christiania Fjord and along the west coast of Norway at least to Malangen, ca. 69?/,°N. L., in 50 to 300 fm. (G. O. Sars, Nordgaard). It was next taken west and south-west of Ireland in depths from a little over 50 to 372 fm. (Norman, Holt & Tattersall). gi. Stilomysis grandis G. O. Sars. 1864. Mysis grandis A. Goés, Ofv. Kgl. Sv. Vet. Akad. Férh., Arg. 20, 1863, p. 176. ! 1879. Mysideis grandis G. O. Sars, Mon. Norges Mysider, III, p. 106, Tab. XLI—XULII. Occurrence. Once taken by the “Ingolf”. Baffin Bay: St. 33: 67° 57'N. L., 55° 30’ W. L., 35 fm., temp. 08°; 4 spec. In Malac. Groenl. it is noted from an adjacent place in Baffin Bay: 67° 4'N.L., 54° 28’ W. L., 32 fm., 2 specimens; later, some specimens were taken at Jakobshavn, 69° 13'N.L., by Traustedt. The Ingolf-Expedition. IIL 2. 15 II4 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. According to Ohlin it has twice been taken at East Greenland, namely, in Franz Joseph Fjord in 55 fm. and at 74° 35'N.L., 18° 15’ W. L., 79 fm. Distribution. It is known from West and East Finmark, 30—100 fm. (G. O. Sars). At Spitz- bergen it has been taken not a few times (Goés, Ohlin, Zimmer) up to 80°N.L,.; in a single case the depth was only 5—16 fm. Lastly it was found at 70° 51'N.L., 53° E.L., 29 fm. (Stebbing). Richters gives it from the Bering Sea, 70 fm., but this determination, in itself not improbable, needs confirmation. 32. Mysis (Praunus) inermis Rathke. 1843. Mysis inermis Rathke, Nova Acta Acad. Cees. Leop.-Car., Tab. XX, p. 20. 1861. — cornuta Kroyer, Nat. Tidsskr., 3. Rekke, B. I, p. 26, Tab. I, Fig. 3 a—g. !1879. — inermis G. O. Sars, Mon. Norges Mysider, III, p. 54, Tab. XXVII. Occurrence. The “Ingolf” has not taken this species. But to judge from the material in the Copenhagen Museum it must be common at the Feroes, as it has been taken a number of times at various localities: Thorshavn, Kvalbo, Kolle Fjord, Tveraa, Sandvaag, Trangisvaag. The depths were quite small, greatest 9'/, fm. Distribution. The species occurs at Shetland, on both coasts of Scotland, north-east Eng- land, Plymouth and Guernsey (Norman); further, in the Zuidersee (Metzger), south-east of Yarmouth (Metzger) and at Heligoland (several observers). It is found at Denmark (Meinert), west coast of Sweden (Goés) and deep in the Baltic (Lindstrom), further it has been taken at Bohuslan (Goés) and is common along the whole coast of Norway (G. O. Sars). Lastly, it has been taken in the White Sea and in the Murman Sea (Czerniavsky and Jarzynsky), a single specimen is noted from Spitzbergen (Kroyer) It is distinctly a shallow water species, usually in depths from 2 out to 10 fathoms. 33. Mysis (Schistomysis) ornata G. O. Sars. 1864. Mysis ornata G. O. Sars, Nyt Mag. for Naturv., B. XIII, p. 264. 11879. — —. G.O. Sars, Mon. Norges Mysider, III, p. 62, Tab. XXIX. Occurrence. The species was taken 6 times by the “Thor” off the south coast of Iceland between 22°56’ and 16° 32’ W.L,. in depths from ca. 25 to 80 fathoms. Distribution. The species is known at Shetland and from several places along the east coast of Great Britain (Norman, Metzger), at Liverpool (Walker), south-west coast of Ireland (Norman), Channel (Internat. Explor.), Holland (Hoek), mouth of the Seine (de Kerville, teste Norman) and Concarneau on the south-west coast of Brittany (Bonnier). It has been taken at two places in the Baltic about the Danish Islands as also round the Kattegat in depths from 4 to 17!/, fm. (Meinert), further repeatedly in the Skager Rak and various parts of the North Sea (several observers). At Norway it goes from Christiania Fjord to Lofoten in depths from 15—20 fm. down to at least 50 fm. (G. O. Sars). 34. Mysis oculata O. Fabr. 1780 (?). Cancer oculatus O. Fabricius, Fauna Groenl., p. 245. 1781 (?). — — O. Fabricius, Kgl. D. Vid. Selsk. Skrifter, Ny Samling, I, p. 565, Fig. 2, A and B. CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 115 1846. Mysis oculata H. Kroyer, Voy. en Scand., Crust. Pl. VIII, figs. 2, a—r and figs. 3, a—f. 1861. — — H. Kroyer, Nat. Tidsskr., 3. Reekke, B. I, p. 13, 11879. — — G.O. Sars, Mon. Norges Mysider, III, p. 69, Tab. XXXI. Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has not taken this species. It is given from 79° 38'N.L. at Grinnell Land (Miers). According to Ortmann (rgor), Ohlin (1895) and myself in Malac. Groenl. the species is common through Smith Sound, on both sides of Baffin Bay and along the east coast of Davis Straits; the numerous depths noted all lie between 2—3 im. to 30—40 fm., but it is doubtful as yet whether depths a little greater are correct, as the specimens, which certainly at times live pelagically, might be taken in the apparatus on hauling in. At East Greenland it is likewise common; it was repeatedly taken at Tasiusak and a little north of this to 66° 15’ N. L.. (1** Amdrup Exped.), further in enormous numbers in the eel-seine in 7—o fm. at 70° 50’ N. L., 22°31’ W.1L,, and two specimens at Sabine Islands: 741/,° N. L., 182/,° W. L. (2°? Amdrup Exped.); Buchholz had already noted it from the last-named locality and from Cape Philip Brooke (74° 56’'N. L., 17° 36’ W.L,.); Ohlin gives it from 4 East Greenland localities, lying respectively in Scoresby Sound and north of Kaiser Franz Joseph Fjord. It was also taken by the 2°¢ Amdrup Ex- pedition at Jan Mayen, where it had been observed previously in quite enormous quantities (G. O. Sars). Further, according to material in the Copenhagen Museum, it has often been taken at Iceland, both on its west coast (Reykjavik and Faxe Fjord), north coast (Onundar Fjord, Ofjord) and east coast (Seydis Fjord and Rede Fjord), but has not been met with on its south coast and seems to be absent at the Feeroes. Distribution. The species is arctic. It is known from West Finmark (Sp. Schneider), East Finmark (G. O. Sars), Murman Sea, Sea of Kara and Siberian Arctic Ocean to the east as far as 85° E. L. (Stuxberg); further, it is common round Spitzbergen (several observers). According to Packard it is “abundant along the whole coast” of Labrador, but Stimpson’s statement of its occurrence on the north-east coast of the States is extremely doubtful according to Smith. Lastly, it is given from the Bering Sea (Richters). It is usually found in 2 to 20 fm. and there are several notes of its occurrence in 30—7o0 fm., but these last I think are not so reliable, as I believe it possible as already mentioned that the specimens on the occasions were taken in the apparatus on hauling in. — The variety JZ relicta found in brackish and fresh water is omitted here. Remarks. The largest female (from East Greenland at 70° 50'N.L.) is 2977 mm. long from front end of rostrum to tip of telson; a large male is 264 mm. long. Ohlin reports that his largest specimen from Smith Sound was 33 mm. long. 35. Mysis mixta Lilljeb. 1853. Mysis mixta W. Lilljeborg, Ofv. Kgl. Sv. Vet. Akad. Férhandl. 9. Arg. 1852, p. 6. 1861. -- latitans Kroyer, Nat. Tidsskr., 3. Reekke, B. I, p. 30, Tab. I, Fig. 4a—b. 11879. — mixta G. O. Sars, Mon. Norges Mysider, III, p. 76, Tab. XX XIII. Occurrence. The “Ingolf’ has not taken this species. At West Greenland it has sometimes been taken, thus in Disco Bay, at Godhavn, Jakobshavn, 15* 116 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. Christianshaab and Holsteensborg, that is from ca. 69'/;N.L. to 66°56'N.L., and the depths varied from 5 to 15 fm. At East Greenland it was twice taken by the 2"4 Amdrup Expedition, namely, along with the previous species in the eel-seine in 7—o fm. at 70° 30'N.L., 22°31’ W. L., and at 72° 28'N.L,, 25° 23' W. L., 3—14 fm.; Ohlin mentions some specimens from the same coast north of Kaiser Franz Joseph Fjord at similar depths. According to material in our Museum it has been taken very frequently at Iceland, namely, on the west coast (Skagi, Reykjavik at the latter locality according to G. O. Sars), north-west coast (Patrik Fjord and @nundar Fjord), north coast (Skdlfandi) and east coast (Seydis Fjord, Rode Fjord and Beru Fjord); the depths were usually from 10 to 35 fm., sometimes possibly less, whilst 74 -fm. is once noted. On the other hand, it is not known from the south coast of Iceland nor from the Feeroes. Distribution. The species has often been taken on the east coast of North America from Fundy Bay to Massachusetts Bay, 20 to 90 fm. (Smith). In Europe its distribution is characteristic: it is given from the Baltic, penetrating right up into the Gulfs of Bothnia and Finland (Internat. Explor.), has been several times taken near the Danish Islands (Meinert), has been found at Kullen on the west coast of Sweden (Lilljeborg), in the inner parts of Christiania Fjord and in Trondhjem Fjord, is also common from Lofoten northwards along the coast and at East Finmark (G. O. Sars). Lastly, it is given from the White Sea and Murman Sea (Czerniavsky and Jarzynsky). At Denmark it has been taken in 6 fm., whilst Sars gives 20—100 fm. for its occurrence at Norway. Remarks. The largest specimens are, as was to be expected, from East Greenland. The largest specimen, a female with half-developed marsupium, measures 31:2 mm. from tip of rostrum to end of telson; the males are not nearly so large and one of the largest from the same locality (70° 50 N. L.) is only 226 mm. long. ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS. Inachus leptochirus Teach is to be added to the list of Decapoda from the region defined for investigation, as A. Appelléf states (Die Dekapoden Crustaceen, 1906, p. 187) that the “Michael Sars” took this species “auf dem Feeré-Plateau (Tiefe 125 Met.)’; he adds that he is unable to decide whether some very small specimens of the genus /nachus from the same locality belong to Z dorynchus Leach. In the lists of synonymy the following dates of publication are to be corrected. In the lists on p. 16, p. 17 and p. 25 Bell, Brit. Crust. is given as published in 1844 instead of 1853. In the lists belonging to Galacantha rostrata (p. 35) and Muni- dopsis curvirostra (p. 36) Smith’s paper is stated as published in 1884 instead of 1882; in the list belonging to Mumnidopsis similis (p. 38) 1887 is given instead of 1886, CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. 117 EXPLANATION OF THE PLATES. Plate I. Fig. 1. Geryon affinis A. Milne-Edwards & Bouvier. Carapace of the male; natural size. Carapace of the ovigerous female; natural size. Fig. 2. Cymonomus Normani Lankester. Body of the female from the “Ingolf’; = scarcely 5. Outline of the front part of the carapace with the eye-stalks of the “Ingolf” specimen; >< ?5/,. Outline of the front part of the carapace with the eye-stalks of a female from the “Thor”; x 25/,. Outline of the front part of the carapace with the eye-stalks of a male from the “Thor”; x 25/,. . Left maxilliped of the “Ingolf” specimen, from below; x ”2/;. Right first leg of the same specimen; x 72/;. Right fourth leg of the same specimen; x 7?/;. Right fifth leg of the same specimen; >< */,. Distal part of right fifth leg; >< 25. Fig. 3. Paralomis spectabilis n. sp. Large male, from Stat. 96; natural size. . Front right part with the peduncle of the antenna of the large male shown in fig. 3a, from above; >< scarcely 3. Left and right antennal squamze of the small male (from stat. 92), both from above and a little obliquely from the outer side; >< "/,. . Left and right antennal squamz of a large female (from stat. 96), both vertically from above; > a little more than 5/,. Plate II. Fig. 1. Paralomis spectabilis n. sp. (continued). Abdomen of the male from Stat. 96; > 1/o. Abdomen of the female from Stat. 96; natural size. Fig. 2. Paralomis Bouvieri n. sp. The female; natural size. Front end of cephalothorax and eyes of the male; x 5. Front right angle of cephalothorax with the proximal part of the antenna of the female, from above; x 5. Front right angle of cephalothorax with the proximal part of the antenna of the male, from above; > 5. Front left angle of cephalothorax with the proximal part of the antenna of the male, from above; & 5. Abdomen of the male; x 5/2. Abdomen of the female; > 3/,. 118 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA, Fig. 3 a. Fig. 4a. Fig. 3. Munida bamffica Pennant. Thoracic sternum with the basal joint of the appendages of the right side of a male from 61° 9' N. L., 7° 34’ W. L., 180 fm.; x 3. Fig. 4. Munida tenuimana G. O. Sars. Thoracic sternum with the basal joint of the appendages of the right side of a large male from the “Ingolf” Stat. 9; < 3. Plate II. Fig. 1. Munida tenuimana G. O. Sars (continued). Body of a large male from the “Ingolf” Stat. 9; x 2. Fig. 2. Munidopsis curvirostra Whiteaves (on the plate curvirostris). . Largest male from the “Ingolf’ Stat. 9; > 2. Cephalothorax of the same male, from the right side; x nearly 2. Cephalothorax of a female from the “Ingolf? Stat. 35; > 9/s. Cephalothorax of another female from the same Station; >< 9/.. Cephalothorax of a male from the “Ingolf? Stat. 28; >< 9/.. Fig. 3. Munidopsis Antonii A. Milne-Edw. & Bouv. Male; >< 3/2. Cephalothorax of the same specimen from the side; x 3/,. Fig. 4. Munidopsis similis S. I. Smith. . Ovigerous female; natural size. . Cephalothorax of the same female, from the right side; natural size. Fig.5. Spongicoloides profundus n. gen., n. sp. . Front part of an ovigerous female, from the left side; x "™/,. . Rostrum of the same specimen; >< II. Rostrum of another ovigerous female; >< 11. . Rostrum of a scarcely full-grown specimen; x 11. . Left antennula (the flagella mutilated), from below; > 19/,. Left antenna (most of the flagellum omitted), from below; >< 19/,. . Left mandible, from below; x 15. . Distal half of the same mandible, from above; >< 22. Left maxillula, from below; > 15. Left maxilla, from below; x15. 7. basal joint; 2. second very short joint produced laterally into the very long, distally cleft lobe, /?; 3. third joint bearing the exopod and produced laterally into the very long distally cleft lobe, 23. Plate IV. Fig. 1. Spongicoloides profundus n. gen., nu. sp. (continued). . Left first maxilliped, from below; x "9/, 22. lobe from second joint; 73. lobe from the third joint; ex. exopod; ef. epipod; 47. rudimentary branchia (arthrobranchia). Left second maxilliped, from below; x '9/,. ef. epipod; arbr. atthrobranchia; podr. podobranchia. Left third maxilliped, from below; x 19/, ef. epipod; arér. arthrobranchia; A/ér. pleurobranchia. Right first trunk-leg, from in front; > 14/;. CRUSTACEA: MALACOSTRACA. 119 tb. Ec, Same leg; x Io. Right third trunk-leg, from in front; > 4/3. . Fifth left trunk-leg, from in front; x ™/;. Distal part of fifth leg; > 20. Pleurobranchia of third trunk-leg; > 21. Second left pleopod, from in front; > 5. Telson and left uropod, from above; x 5. (All marginal setz are plumose, but it could not be shown in the figure). Fig. 2. Acanthephyra Batei Faxon (on the plate the synonym A. brevirostris Bate). . Front half of the animal; » 3/,. Fig. 3. Gnathophausia Zoéa Will.-Suhm. . Terminal part of the left mandible, from below, = 18. c¢. cutting edge; /m. lacinia mobilis; m. pars molaris. Same part. from above; x18. ¢@ lacinia mobilis. Terminal part of the right mandible; from above; x 18. Left maxillula, from below; x '5/,. 7. first joint, from which the long lobe, /', proceeds; 2. second joint; 3. third joint produced into a long lobe; 4. fourth joint; 5. fifth joint. The uniformly greyish portions are membranous. Left maxilla, from below; x '5/, 7. first joint, without any lobe; 2. second joint, from which the very long lobe, /?, proceeds; 3. third joint, produced into the long, distally cleft lobe, 73, and bearing the exopod, ex.; 4. fourth, and 5. fifth joint, both without any lobe. The uniformly greyish areas are membranous skin. Fig. 4. Hansenomysis Fylle H. J. H. Cephalothorax with the basal parts of the antennula and the antenna of an adult female, from the left side; x 7°/;, VZ. and V/ZZ. sixth and seventh entirely free thoracic segments. o. ocular plate. Front part of cephalothorax with antennule and antennz of an adult male, from above; x 8. Front part of the carapace with the basal parts of the right antennula and antenna of the female shown in fig.4a; x 8 o. ocular plate. First right pleopod in the male, from behind; x 109. . Second right pleopod in the male, from behind; > ro. Third right pleopod in the male, from behind; > 19. Fourth right pleopod in the male, from behind; x 109. . Fifth right pleopod in the male, from behind; x 19. Posterior part of abdomen in the male, from above; >< II. Terminal part of the telson shown in fig. 4i, from above; > 29. Plate V. Fig. 1. Longithorax fuscus n. sp. Female with the marsupium half developed; >< scarcely 5. Most of the legs broken off. Head of the same specimen, from the left side; >< 8 Of the antennula only the two proximal peduncular joints present. Same head, from above; x 8. Right antennal squama, from above; >< 23. 120 CRUSTACEA MALACOSTRACA. Fig. re. Left mandible, from below; x 23. — If. Distal part of left mandible, from below; x 75. — 1g. Left maxillula, from below; x 44. — th. Left maxilla, from below; x 44. — ti. Left maxilliped, from below; x 23. — 1k. Left first thoracic leg, from below; x 23. The exopod broken off. — 11 Exopod of fourth thoracic leg; x 12. — 1m. Right sixth thoracic leg, from below; < 23. The exopod broken off. — «In. Telson and uropods, from above; < 11. Distal part of both exopods broken off. — 10. Distal part of the telson, from above; x 22. Some of the terminal and marginal spines broken or broken off. Fig. 2. Pseudomma roseum G. O. Sars. Fig.2a. Right antennal squama of an adult female from the “Ingolf” Stat. 27, from above; x scarcely rr. — 2b. Right antennal squama of an adult male taken by the “Thor”, from above; x scarcely Ir. Fig. 3. Pseudomma frigidum un. sp. Fig.3a. Ocular plate of a female with marsupium; > 11. — 3b. Right antennal squama of an adult female from the “Ingolf” Stat. 138, from above; >< scarcely 11. Fig. 4. Pseudomma parvum Vanhoffen. Fig.4a. Ocular plate of an ovigerous female, from above; x 35. . Antennal squama of a male; x 26. Left mandible of the adult female, from below; > 28. . Left maxilliped of the same female, from below; x 28. Left first thoracic leg of the same female, from below; > 28. Major part of the abdomen of the ovigerous female, seen from the left side especially in order to show the length of the pleopoda; x 12. . Telson and right uropod of the adult female, from above; > 21. . Telson of the same female; >< 35. Fig. 5. Pseudomysis abyssi G. O. Sars. . Left eye-stalk of a male, from above; x Io. . Right first pleopod of a male, from behind; x "/,. Inner ramus and basal part of the pleopod shown in fig. 5 b; >< 12. . Right fourth pleopod of the same male, from behind; x '/,. Among the figures, figs.1 a and 1b on Pl. I, and fig.2a on Pl. IV have been drawn by Mr. E. Bang; fig.3a on PII, figs.1a, rb, 2a, 2f, 2g, 3a and 4a on PLII, figs.1a, 3a, 3b, 4a and 4b on Pl. IIT have been drawn by Mr. Th. Bloch, but all have been corrected and frequently con- siderably altered by the author. All the remaining figures on the Plates have been drawn by the author. LJ. Hansen: Crustacea Matacostraca LZ, Fl. I Lhe ligell Eupedition Ml. 2. 2. Cymonomus Norman Lank. Edw. & Bouv. 1. Geryor attincs A. Milne’ Paratomis spectabilis ww. sv. 3. Lhe lngolt Kupediteon Il, 2. LAS. Hanser: Crustacea Malacostraca 1 PlI NG A "aA Hi / SS \ 2. Paratomis spectabilis nw. pr. 2. P fGouviert nw. mp. 3. Munida barmftica Penn. 4 M tenuimane 408. LN Miller se. The Ingolf Bupedition Ul. 2. HT Hansen’: Crustacea Malacostraca I. Pl. ll. Se Ll Munida tenuimana 6.08. 2. Munidopsis curvirostris Whit. 3M. Antonit M-Fdo. « Bowe. 4. M.simitis Smith. 3. Spongtcolotdes proviundus n. gen. re sp. 4S. Hansen: Crustacea Malacostraca T. Pt. WW. L. Spongicoloides profundus m gen.n.sp. 2. Acanthenhyra brevirostris Sn. Bate 3. Gnathophausia Zoéa W-S. A 4. Hansenomysis hylle HTH. The Ingolt Kupedition IL. 2. . MS Hanser: Crustacea Malacostraca I Pi. V- =| eo s 2 rh | th t i i Hii) ! 4. Longttherax fuscus n.sp. 2. Pseudomma roseum G4.0S8S. 3. P. frigétdum mn. sp. eae sia aes 4 2 parvum Vanh. 5 Pseudomysis abysst C08. LW Melier se. Beit INGOLP-EXPEDITION 1895—1896. THE LOCALITIES, DEPTHS, AND BOTTOMTEMPERATURES OF THE STATIONS. Depth Depth Depth sition | rat [Eone | [Pccam| sem | nae x, rong. wl, fame | GM TaN (Lone Wc fathoms fathoms | fathoms I 62° 30° 8° 21’ 132 7°2 24 63° 06° | 56° 00’ 1199 2°4 45 61° 32° 9° 43° 643 4°17 2 63° 04" 9° 22’ 262 5°3 25 63° 30 | 54°25 582 aoe 46 642 \39' |) Ter eh: 720 2°40 3 63° 35° | 10° 24" 272 0°5 63° 51’ | 53°03 136 47 61° 32’ | 13° 40° 950 3°23 4 64° 07’ erga" 237 2°5 26 63° 57° | 52°41’ 34 0°6 48 61° 32’ 15° 11’ 1150 3°27 5 64° 40’ | 12° 09! 155 64° 37° | 54° 24° 109 49 62°07’ | 15°07’ | 1120 2°91 6 63° 43° | 14°34 go 7°0 27 64° 54° | 55° 10’ 393 3°8 50 62° 43° | 15°07’ | 1020 3°13 7 642:23") 157 ar 600 4°5 28 65° 14 | 55° 42’ 420 305 51 64° 15° | TAS oe 68 9°22 8 63° 56’ | 24°40 136 6°o0 29 65° 34° | 54°31’ 68 0°2 52 639.57": |} aa 420 7°87 9 64° 18’ | 27° 00° 295 5°8 30 66° 50° | 54° 28° 22 1°05 53 64075 15° 07’ 795 3°08 10 64° 24’ 28° 50° 788 3°5 31 66° 35° | 55°54 88 1% 54 63° 08’ 15° 40° 691 3°9 II 64° 34° | 31°12’ | 1300 1°6 32 66° 35° | 56° 38" 318 3°9 55 63° 33° | 15°02 316 5°9 12 64° 38’ | 32°37’ | 1040 0°3, 33 67° 577 | 55°30 35 | 088 56 64° 00’ | 15° 09 68 7°57 13 64° 47 | 34°33 622 3°0 34 65°27 | 54°17 55 57 632 -37' |: tah eae | “i350 3°4 14 64° 45° | 35° 05° 176 4°4 35 65° 16° | 55°05 362 3°6 58 64° 25° | 12°09 211 0°8 15 66° 18’ | 25°59’ 330. | —0°75 36 61° 50° | 56°21’ 1435 1°5 59 65° 00° | 11° 16 310 | —o°r 16 65° 43 | 26° 58’ 250 6°r 37 60° 17° | 54°05" 1715 1°4 60 65°09) | 12°27’ 124 0°9 17 62° 49° | 26° 55’ 745 3°4 38 59° 12" | 51°05 | 1870 Bas 61 65° 03° | 13° 06 55 0°4 18 61° 44’ | 30° 29 1135 3°0 39 62° 00° | 22° 38’ 865 2°9 62 63° 18 | 19° 12" 72 7°92 19 60° 29’ | 34° 14° 1566 2°4 40 62° 00° | 21° 36 845 eae} 63 62° 40’ 19° 05° 800 4°o 20 58° 20° | 40° 48’ 1695 1°5 41 61° 39 17° 10° 1245 2°o 64 62° 06’ 19° 00" 1041 as 21 58° or’ | 44°45 1330 2°4 42 61° AF | AOE, 625 0°4 65 61° 33° | 19° 00° 1089 3°0 22 58° 10° | 48° 25° 1845 1°4 43 61° 42 SOR Es, 645 0°05 66 6° 33"5 |° 207-45. 1128 3°3 23 | 60°43' | 56°00! Punkion Se 44 | 61°42’ | 9°36 | 545 | 4°8 67 | 61°30° | 22°30 | 975 | 3° Depth Depth Depth OND re is cease ee oe one, | Ae [tone grey [enn | Ht: [Long w. Dai me : ‘ fathoms fathoms fathoms 68 62° 06’ | 22° 30° 843 3°4 92 64° 44° | 32°52’ 976 1°4 118 68° 27’ 8° 20° 1060 | —1°o 69 62° 40° =| 22°17’ 589 3°9 93 64° 24’ | 35° 14 767 : : 1°46 IIg 67° 53° | 10° 19 Iolo | —1°o 70 63° 09’ =| 22°05’ 134 7°0 94 64° 56’ | 36° 19’ 204 4°r 120 67529 =| r1° 32’ 885 | —1°o 71 63° 46’ | 22°03’ 46 65° 31 | 30°45 213 121 66° 59° | 13°11’ 529 | —0°7 72 | 63°12 | 23° 04 197 6°7 95 65° 14° | 30° 39° 752 227 122 | 66°42’ | 14° 44’ 115 1°8 73 62° 58’ | 23° 28’ 486 5°5 96 65° 24’ | 29° 00° 735 12 123 66° 52° | 15° 40’ 145 2°o 74 62°17 | 24°36 695 4°2 97 65° 28’ | 27° 39° 450 5°5 124 67° 40’ | 15° 40 495 | —0°6 61° 57° | 25° 35° 761 98 65° 38’ | 26° 27’ 138 5°9 125 68° 08’ 16° 02’ 729 —o°8 61° 28’ | 25° 06’ 829 99 66° 13° | 25°53 187 6°r 126 1g | 15° Sa 293 | —0°5 75 61°28: || 26° 25° 780 4°3 100 66° 23’ | 14°02’ 59 0°4 127 66° 33° | 20°05’ 44 5°6 76 60° 50° | 26° 50° 806 4°1 IOI O67: 22°} 12°05 537 | —0°7 128 66° 50’ | 20° 02’ 194. 0°6 77 60° Io’ | 26° 59' 951 3°6 102 66° 23° | 10° 26 750 | —0o°9 129 CO a5 St -23° 47° 117 6°5 78 60° 37’ | 27° 52’ 799 4°5 103, 66° 23° 8° 52’ 579 | —0°%6 130 63°00’ | 20° 40’ 338 6°55 79 | 60°52” | 28° 58’ 653 4°4 104 | 66°23° | 7°25’ O87 | Eek 131 | 63° 00° | 19° 09 698 4°7 80 61° 02’ | 29° 32’ 935 4°o am, 65° 34’ We ar 762 | —o°8 132 63° 00° | 17° 04’ 747 4°6 81 61° 44’ =| 27° 00° 485 6°r 106 65° 34 8° 54 447 | —0%6 133 63° 14’ | 11° 24’ aie 2 82 61° 55’ 27° 28' 824 4°1 65° 29° 8° 40° 466 134 62° 34’ 10°-26' 299 4°r 83 62° 25’ | 28° 30° gI2 3°5 107 65° 33° | 10° 28’ 492 | —0°3 135 62° 48’ 9° 48" 270 0°4 62° 36’ | 26° or’ 472 108 65° 30° | 12°00 97 a 136 63° or’ g° rr’ 256 4°8 62° 36 | 25° 30° 401 109 65°29’ | 13° 25 38 1°5 137 63° 14 8° 31’ 297 | —0°6 84 62°58" ||. 25° aa" 633 4°8 IIo 66° 44’ | 11° 33 781 | —o°8 138 63° 26’ 7° 56 471 | —0°6 85 63%ar". | 25° ax’ 170 III 67° 14° 8° 48" 860 | —o°g 139 63° 36° 7° 30° jo2 | —0% 86 65° 03'6 | 23° 47'6 76 112 67° 57’ 6° 44° 1267 | —1°1 140 63° 29° 6° 57’ 780 | —0°9 87 65° 02’; | 23° 56'2 110 113 69° 31’ 7° 06 1309 | —1°o 141 63° 22’ 6° 58" 679 | —0%6 88. | 64° 58° | 24° 25° 76 6°9 114 | 70°36’ | 7°29! 773 | —1°0 142 | 63°07’ | 7°05 587 | —0°6 89 64° 45° | 27° 20° 310 8°4 115 70° 50° 8° 29 86 O° 143 62° 58° 7° 09° 388 | —0%4 go 64° 45° | 29° 06’ 568 4°4 116 70° 05" 8° 26’ 371 | —0%4 144 62° 49’ «dae © 276 1°6 gI 64° 44° 31° 00 1236 ahh 117 69° 13° 8° 23' 1003 | —1°o nee cere Prone tight apts Ss Batt tate ae as igh BOE RELES euEiG