DECOMPOSITION, FUNCTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF ORGANIC MATTER IN A SANDY NURSERY SOIL By KENNETH RICHARD MUNSON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 1982 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to thank Dr. E. L. Stone for his guidance as my com- mittee chairman, and for sharing with me his scholarship, enthusiasm, and keen sense for reason. I also wish to thank Dr. W. L. Pritchett, Dr. E. L. Barnard, Dr. R. F. Fisher, Dr. C. A. Hollis, and Dr. D. H. Marx for their advice during the course of this investigation. I appreciate the laboratory support provided by Mary McLeod, and the statistical advice of John Shelton. I gratefully acknowledge Container Corporation of America for allowing me to conduct this research at the company nursery. I particularly wish to thank Mr. Dale Rye for his conscientious co- operation and practical perspective. Finally, I thank the Cooperative Research in Forest Fertilization program for providing financial support. TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS u LIST OF TABLES v LIST OF FIGURES *** ABSTRACT viii GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 LITERATURE REVIEW 4 CHAPTER I. FIELD MACROPLOT STUDY WITH PEAT 1 fl Introduction Materials and Methods ....... 11 Study Area ]] Experimental Design and Conduct H Sampling Scheme • ■ - * Laboratory and Chemical Analyses ,...., 15 Statistical Analysis , 16 Results and Discussion 18 Peat Decomposition 18 Effects on Soil Chemical Properties , 22 Effects on Seedling Development 27 Effects on Mycorrhizae and Incidence of Charcoal Root Rot ............. 37 CHAPTER II. FIELD MICROPLOT STUDY WITH VARIOUS ORGANIC MATERIALS Introduction 40 Materials and Methods - - 41 Study Area 41 Experimental Design and Conduct 41 Sampling Scheme * - - 44 Analyses ■ • ■ 45 Results and Discussion 47 Decomposition . - • 47 Effects on Soil Chemical Properties 54 Effects on Seedling Development . . 63 ui Effects on Mycorrhizae and Incidence of Charcoal Root Rot 70 Utility of the Microplot Method 72 General Conclusions 74 CHAPTER III. LABORATORY INCUBATION OF VARIOUS ORGANIC MATERIALS Introduction 76 Materials and Methods 77 Experimental Design and Conduct 77 Chemical Analyses 79 Statistical Analyses 79 Results and Discussion 81 CO2 Evolution as Influenced by Amendment 81 CO2 Evolution as Influenced by Amendment Rate 88 Utility of the Method for Predictive Purposes 91 LITERATURE CITED „ 92 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH , 96 LIST OF TABLES 1-1. Analysis of variance designs used for treatment compar- isons 17 1-2. Soil reaction as influenced by peat amendment 23 1-3. Soil nutrient status as influenced by peat application and time of sampling 24 1-4. Soil nutrient status after 21 months as influenced by peat application averaged across fumigation, and by fumigation averaged across all peat rates 26 1-5. Physical parameters of two successive crops of slash pine seedlings as influenced by peat amendment averaged across fumigation treatment 28 1-6. Physical parameters of two successive crops of slash pine seedlings as influenced by fumigation averaged across all peat treatments 29 1-7 Element concentrations of slash pine seedling shoots grown in 1981 as influenced by peat amendment averaged across fumigation treatment 31 1-8. Elemental contents of slash pine seedling shoots grown in 1981 as influenced by peat amendment averaged across fumigation treatment 35 1-9. Elemental contents of slash pine seedling shoots grown in 1981 as influenced by fumigation averaged across all peat treatments 36 1-10 Ectomycorrhizal infection as influenced by peat addition and fumigation 38 2-1. Chemical characteristics and particle size distribution of four organic materials used as nursery soil amendments.. 43 2-2. Analysis of variance designs used for comparisons among treatments 46 2-3 Soil nutrient and OM status as influenced by four organic amendments at 3 and 18 months after application ........ 58 2-4. Double-acid extractable concentrations of Mn and Zn in soil- amendment mixtures 3 and 18 months after appli- cation 62 2-5. Physical parameters of slash pine seedlings as influenced by four organic amendments averaged across application rates in 1980 and 1981 64 2-6. Element concentrations (% dry weight) and contents (mg/ seedling) of slash pine seedling shoots as influenced by four organic amendments averaged across application rates ... 66 2-7. Microelement concentrations (ppm dry weight) of 1981 slash pine seedling shoots as influenced by four organic amend- ments averaged across application rates 67 2-8. Approximate percentages of short roots colonized by ectomycorrhizal fungi as influenced by treatments 71 3-1. Chemical characteristics of organic materials and unamended soil 78 3-2. Analysis of variance designs used for comparisons of C02 evolution among materials and rates 82 3-3. Monthly (4 week) CO 2 evolution from 100 g nursery soil incubated with 2 g (ash free) organic material from several sources , 83 3-4. Monthly (4 week) CO 2 evolution from 100 g nursery soil incubated with 1, 2, and 3 g (ash free) peat or pulp mill waste 89 LIST OF FIGURES 1-1. Field plot arrangement showing random locations of treat- ment, fumigation subplots, and 0.1 m2 sample quadrats .. 13 1-2. Organic matter decomposition in an unfumigated nursery- soil amended with peat at three rates 19 1-3. Nitrogen and Mn concentrations in slash pine seedlings shoots grown in 1981 as influenced by peat amendment averaged across fumigation treatment 32 1-4. Elemental concentrations of slash pine seedling shoots grown in 1981 as influenced by fumigation averaged across peat treatment 33 1-5. Nitrogen and P contents of slash pine seedling shoots grown in 1981 as influenced by peat amendment averaged across fumigation treatment 34 2-1. Bucket microplot location, microplot with soil + organic mixture , and the cross section of nursery bed with micro- plots in place 42 2-2. Organic matter decomposition in a nursery soil amended with four organic materials at three rates 49 2-3. Soil reaction as influenced by four organic amendments applied at three rates 56 3-1. Schematic of laboratory incubation apparatus showing incubation vessel and CO„ trap for 1 of 36 units 80 3-2. Cumulative CO2 evolution from 100 g of nursery soil amended with 2 g ash-free OM from several sources 86 3-3. Cumulative CO 2 evolution from 100 g of nursery soil amended with three rates of pulp mill waste and peat ... 90 Vll Abstract of Dissertation presented to the Graduate Council of the University of Florida in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy DECOMPOSITION, FUNCTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF ORGANIC MATTER IN A SANDY NURSERY SOIL By Kenneth Richard Munson December 1982 Chairman: Earl L. Stone Major Department: Soil Science Decomposition of organic soil amendments (OM) and their effects on soil properties and seedling growth were examined in a Florida forest nursery. Peat was applied at 22.4, 44.8, and 67.2 mt/ha to field macroplots, with and without fumigation. Peat, sewage sludge, shredded pine cones, and old pine sawdust applied at 22.4, 44.8, and 89.6 mt/ha were tested in field microplots. Two slash pine {Pinus elliottii var. elliottii Engelm.) crops were grown in the macro- and microplots. In a third study, CO„ evolution was monitored during laboratory incubation of the foregoing materials, plus pine bark and pulp mill waste, in nursery soil. About 20% of the peat applied at the higher rates in the macroplots had decomposed after 21 months. Soil reaction was lowered below the control by 0.3 pH unit/1% peat. vm Seedlings from peat-treated plots were heavier, and had greater N and P concentrations than control seedlings. Seedlings from fumigated subplots had greater dry matter, but lower concentrations of most nu- trients, than those from unfumigated soil. After 18 months the loss rates of OM in the microplots at, respec- tively, the 22.4, 44.8, and 89.6 mt/ha additions were as follows: Peat, 62, 51, 51%; sludge, 51, 54, 44%; cones, 51, 68, 68%; sawdust, 73, 53, 50%. Peat decomposed 2-2^ times more rapidly in the microplots than in the macroplots . As in the macroplots, peat lowered soil reaction. Cones and sawdust lowered pH slightly after 12 months. Sludge increased pH from 5.7 to 6.5 initially, then reduced it to 4.8 after 3 months. Peat decomposed without appreciable changes in N/OM ratios. The high N concentration (5.6%) in sludge resulted in leaching of N03 and bases. Seedlings from peat-amended soil had greater shoot-N contents, and those from sludge-treated plots had greater concentrations of most elements than control seedlings. Cones or sawdust did not reduce growth or N-uptake below the control. Under laboratory conditions for 7 months, < 5% of the sawdust, cones, and bark had decomposed. Sludge, mill waste, and peat lost 10, 11, and 1%, respectively, of the added carbon. GENERAL INTRODUCTION Increasing demands for wood products and a decreasing area of productive forest land emphasize the need for efficient reforestation procedures. In the United States over 2 million acres were artificially reforested in 1980, principally by planting seedlings grown in specialized forest nurseries. Most of this planting stock, 1.4 billion, was grown as "bare root" seedlings. Thus, reforestation programs begin in the nursery with production of quality stock that will meet the objective of survival and growth after outplanting. Nursery management practices such as cultivation, fumigation and entire seedling removal place intense demands on the soil resource. With- out preventative measures the resource can be rapidly depleted, resulting in a loss of productivity (Thompson and Smith 1947) . This loss may be manifested by seedlings of low quality with a low potential to survive once outplanted. One such preventative measure is organic matter (OM) maintenance. Such maintenance, however, is the most common problem associated with nursery soil management (Abbott and Fitch 1977) . Nurseries are normally established on sites characterized by well-drained, sandy soils. These properties facilitate seedbed formation, fumigation when necessary, soil moisture control and seedling lifting. The frequent additions of in- organic nutrients and water, however, coupled with well-aerated soils produce conditions conducive to rapid OM decomposition. This process is accelerated by the climatic conditions of the southeastern United States. Organic materials used in OM maintenance programs include (a) those grown on-site (cover crops) and (b) those brought to the site. Although the use of cover crops is the conventional method of OM maintenance, rapid decomposition of green crops after incor- poration into the soil has led to questioning of their actual value (Davey and Krause 1980) . Exogenous sources of OM have been used for many years, and currently are receiving considerable attention. A large variety of materials have been used, including peat and sawdust. Several studies have examined the influence of OM additions on seedling growth and, to a lesser extent, on soil properties (Wilde and Hull 1937, Davey 1953, Brown and Myland 1979). Relatively little emphasis has been placed on quantifying the decomposition of any organic materials applied to nursery soils. Therefore, a series of three studies were conducted to examine the influence of several organic materials on OM levels, selected soil properties and seedling development. Peat was emphasized due to the occurrence of peat deposits in Florida. The first study consisted of operational- scale field plots testing addition of peat at three rates with or without fumigation, over a 21-month period. The second study consisted of field microplots comparing peat, sawdust, shredded cones, and sewage sludge at three rates over an 18-month period. The third study, under laboratory conditions, compared the decomposi- tion of the foregoing materials plus two others—bark and pulp mill waste — over a 7-month period. The overall thrust of the investigation was to provide quanti- tative information on the decomposition of organic materials, especially peat, and on their effects on seedling development when applied to sandy nursery soils in Florida. LITERATURE REVIEW The history of the plant and soil sciences reveals that the impor- tance of organic matter (OM) with regard to plant growth was one of the major revelations of early investigators. A chronological sequence of investigators, including Bacon, Van Helmont, Boyle, Glauber, Mayow, Woodward, deSaussure, Liebig, and Lawes and Gilbert, conducted a progressive series of trials, errors, and observations which eventually demonstrated the great influence of OM on plant growth and development (Russell 1973) . The more precise description of the role of OM in plant functions has come about in the past century largely by virtue of tech- nological advances which have improved the separation, detection, and characterization of OM components at the compound and ionic levels. Subsequent research on the formation, composition, function and fate of soil OM has been reviewed by several authors (Waksman 1938; Kononova 1961; Schnitzer and Khan 1972, 1978; Allison 1973). Ever since OM was shown to have such decided effects on plant growth, its maintenance has carried a position of prominence in soil management. Because decomposition is a degenerative process, the task of maintaining a given level of OM is never accomplished. Several studies have demonstrated the rapid decomposition rates of agronomic crop residues and green manures. For example, Parker (1962) showed a 65% loss of cornstalk residue when buried in the soil for 20 weeks. Brown and Dickey (1970) reported losses of 50% in 3 months and 93% in 18 months for wheat straw buried in soil. Sain and Broadbent (1977) showed a 40% loss of buried wheat straw between November and April. More substantive reviews of the rapid decomposition of agronomic crop residues have been provided by Russell (1973) and Allison (1973). The problems associated with OM maintenance are nowhere more appreciated than in soil-based nursery systems which produce orna- mental or forest tree seedlings. The moist but well-aerated soils and frequent nutrient additions in most nurseries produce ideal conditions for microbial oxidation of organic residues. The problem is further accentuated by complete crop removal, as opposed to most agricultural crops where much of the plant remains in the field after harvest. A contemporary review of the function and maintenance of OM in forest nursery soils is presented by Davey and Krause (1980). They sub- divide OM into two general fractions: (a) stable, and (b) dynamic. They point out that the stable fraction has an equilibrium level which varies with geographic location. The cooler temperatures and often the presence of finer-textured soils in the more northern nurseries result in OM equilibrium levels of 3 to 5%. In the lower coastal plain of the southeastern United States this level is often near 1%. Such geographic variation in OM equilibrium levels is discussed further by Brady (1974). Since little can be done to significantly increase the stable OM fraction, OM maintenance programs must be directed at manipulating the dynamic fraction. For practical purposes, this fraction consists of organic materials which have not been re-synthesized into humic substances. Methods to maintain or increase this dynamic fraction have included growing materials on-site in the form of cover crops or bringing materials to the site. The use of cover crops has been the conventional method of OM maintenance, being practiced by 92 of 99 nurseries surveyed by Abbott and Fitch (1977). A study by Sumner and Bouton (1981) in a Georgia nursery compared several spring and fall sown cover crops. Summer crops of sorghum and pearl millet yielded 13.2 and 12.1 mt/ha, while a winter crop of crimson clover + ryegrass yielded 8.3 mt/ha. Soil organic matter content was initially 1.1% which led them to conclude that it was not possible to increase the OM content above a level of 1.4 to 1.6%, even if a rotation involving 2 years of cover cropping were practiced. Such an increase is not an unreasonable expectation, however, as suggested by Pritchett (1979). An addition of 10 mt/ha (dry weight) of cover crop is equivalent to an initial increase of 0.5% OM in the surface layer. Much of this will decompose in the first few months after incorporation. Moreover, some studies have shown that incorporation of green manures will accelerate the loss of carbon and nitrogen from the native OM (Broadbent 1948, Lohnis 1926). A general conclusion of this brief review is that substantial increases in OM may be achieved only by addition of exogenous materials. The. historical use of exogenous materials for OM maintenance was discussed by Allison (1973) and Davey and Krause (1980). The survey by Abbott and Fitch (1977) showed the most commonly used organic materials and the numbers of nurseries reporting their use as follows: sawdust, 35; peat, 14; manure, 7; rotted bark, 5; wood chips, 3; mushroom compost, 3. Investigations on the use of sawdust have demonstrated that fresh materials may create nutritional or phytotoxic problems, but that composting renders them more useful for plant growth (Turk 1943, Allison and Anderson 1951, Davey 1953, Iyer and Morby 1979) . Peat has been used extensively in northern nur- series with generally good results on plant growth (Burd 1918, Wilde and Hull 1937, Lunt 1961, Brown and Myland 1979), Manure, rotted bark and mushroom compost have been used successfully but are only locally available. Wood chips have been used to some extent but generally have been too coarse to be of immediate value as OM (Lunt 1955). The recent emphasis on land application of municipal sewage sludge has resulted in some nurseries using the digested material directly from the treatment f acuity, or as a packaged product, such as "Milorganite," sold by the city of Milwaukee , Wisconsin . Several studies have examined the organic matter and nutritive value of various sludges (Gouin 1977, Sommers 1977, Magdoff and Amadon 1980). The general concern in ap- plying sludge is the possibility of high contents of heavy metals and calcium. The latter may result in increasing pH well above that con- sidered to be optimum for pine seedlings (5.0 to 6.0, Armson and Sadreika 1979). Additionally, since most sewage sludges have high nitrogen contents (2 to 7%), even moderate application rates may result in large leaching losses of nitrates. This can accelerate the leaching 8 losses of Ca, Mg and K (Raney 1960). Ultimately, application of any organic amendment should be preceded by adequate knowledge of its in- fluences on plant growth. Once a material has been determined to be a suitable amendment in terms of plant growth, the question of availability at a reasonable cost arises. Diminishing supplies of waste wood in recent years and competing demands have reduced availability of low cost chips and saw- dust. This, coupled with their limitations as amendments, has made nursery managers search for other materials. The availability of alternate materials, however, depends on each individual nursery's situation . An examination of organic materials available to forest nurseries in Florida reveals that peat has attractive possibilities. Peat has been used successfully in northern nurseries, as cited earlier, and has been shown to have low to moderate decomposition rates as well as having ben- eficial effects on plant growth (Feustel and Byers 1933) . An account of the distribution and utilization of the peat resources in Florida is provided by Davis (1946). Although the major peat resource is in south Florida, a significant number of deposits occur in the northeast and north central portion of the state. Furthermore, the majority of north Florida peats are acidic in reaction. Since most of the forest nurseries in Florida are located in the northern portion of the state, the potential for using peat in these nurseries appears promising., The ability to exploit such deposits, however, rests on combinations of ownership, managerial and logistical considerations unique to each nursery. The benefits derived from OM additions appear to be well docu- mented. Questions of how much to apply and to what degree seedling quality will increase, however, remain largely unanswered. Until the criteria indicative of seedling quality are clearly established, the latter question cannot be answered. An answer to the first question is attainable assuming that a given level of OM is set as an objective. Optimum application rates for various materials are functions of (a) their effect on seedling growth, and (b) the rate of decomposition. Although several of the aforementioned studies evaluated the effects of organic additions on seedling growth and on decomposition under labor- atory conditions (Feustel and Byers 1933, Allison 1965, Agbim et al. , 1977) , there is little quantitative information on decomposition rates under field conditions. Such information is required for knowledgeable decisions in formulating OM maintenance programs. CHAPTER I FIELD MACROPLOT STUDY WITH PEAT Introduction Woody materials such as sawdust, chips and bark have been used as soil amendments during the past several decades, but recently have become less available at a low cost due to more complete use in manu- facturing processes, such as fuel, or for other purposes. Nursery managers are therefore searching for new alternative sources and re- evaluating the old. One such alternative is peat. Peat has been used extensively in nurseries in the Lake States, primarily because peat deposits were fairly abundant and within reasonable trucking distance to the nursery. Far less emphasis has been placed on peat as an or- ganic amendment for nurseries in the Southeast. Several nurseries in Florida are fairly close to peat deposits making use of peat a potential alternative . The overall hypothesis of this investigation is that pine nursery- seedlings can be grown continuously in the same ground without need for alternate-year cover cropping and regular soil fumigation, provided that soil organic matter is maintained at or above its current level by appropriate additions. This study examined the utility of peat for this purpose, including its rate of decomposition, its effect on selected soil properties, and its influence — with and without soil fumigation — on seedling growth, mycorrhizal status and incidence of charcoal root rot. 10 11 Materials and Methods Study Area The study was conducted at the Container Corporation of America forest tree nursery near Archer, Florida. The soil in the study com- partment is classified as Millhopper sand (loamy, siliceous, hyperthermic Grossarenic Paleudult) . This series consists of moderately well drained, moderately permeable soils that formed in thick beds of sandy and loamy marine sediments. Prior to clearing and grading as a nursery in 1970, the area had been successively cultivated, abandoned, and planted to slash pine (Pinus elliottii var . elliottii Engelm.). The first seedling crop was grown in 1971. Mean July and January monthly temperatures are 27° and 14° C, respectively. Annual precipitation averages 1240 mm, most of which occurs in summer and winter. Experimental Design and Conduct The shredded peat applied as a soil amendment was obtained from a commercial peat mine, 45 km distant. It would be classified as a medisaprist, apparently derived from grasses and sedges. It is acid, pH 4.5 (in water). Its dry weight composition is ash, 14%; C, 53.7%; N, 2.85% (3.3% ash-free basis); C/N, 18.8; CEC, 100 to 200 meq/100 g. Total elemental concentrations (ppm) are as follows: P, 160; K, 90; Ca, 1250; Mg, 415; Cu , 3; Fe , 950; Mn , 5; Zn, 3. 12 The experiment was established in a compartment that had been under a 1:1 or 1:2 cover crop : pine rotation for 8 years. The primary cover crop used had been pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Brown]. The crop immediately preceding the experiment was slash pine established after fumigation. Following experimental treatment, two additional crops of slash pine were grown successively in 1980 and 1981. Contrary to routine procedure, the experimental beds were not fumigated except as a designed treatment. With ex- ception of this and the peat application, almost all other cultural practices — sowing, weed control, fungicide sprays, irrigation and fertilization — were identical, with routine treatment of operational slash pine beds in this compartment. The only further exception was that seedlings in the experimental area were not top-mowed late in the season . Four rates of peat (0, 22.4, 44.8, and 67.2 dry mt/ha) with three replicates were applied to 6 x 18-m plots covering a total area of 18 x 72 m (Fig. 1-1). The intent of the additions [P., P 2> Pg, res- pectively) was to raise soil organic matter (OM) levels by approximately 1, 2, and 3% above the native level of 1%. The treatments were arranged in a completely randomized design. Each plot was three standard nur- sery beds in width, but measurements were confined to a 4 x 16-m area in each plot. The 1-m wide border around the sample area served as a buffer against soil mixing during nursery operations. A subplot, 6-m long, in each central bed (per plot) was fumigated with MC-2 13 C\J ro O \ \ \ ro O CVJN \ \ \ - CVJ - E CO O rO -« ! 1 t- W8l 14 (98% methyl bromide, 2% chloropycrin) (Fig. 1-1) after peat application (1980) or tillage (1981), and 1 week prior to sowing. The fumigated plots were in the same location in both years. Peat was applied with a front-end loader in April 1980, spread uniformly by hand, and incorporated to 20 cm using a mould-board plow and repeated discing. Seed was sown in May 1980 and 1981 to achieve a postemergent density of 28 stems/Q.l m . The fertilizer regime consisted of pre-plant applications of 672 kg /ha 5-10-20 in 1980 and 0-10-20 in 1981, followed by four maintenance applications of 168 kg /ha 10-10-10 in 1980 and only two in 1981. The postemergence fertilizers were broadcast as granular and liquid in 1980 and 1981, res- pectively. AU fertilizer materials had a micronutrient mix of Mn (.2%), Fe (.1%), Zn (.05%), B (.05%), and Mg (.06%). The lower amounts of fertilizer nutrients supplied in 1981 apparently account for the smaUer total dry matter production in that year. Sampling Scheme Soil samples were taken before and after peat application, then subsequently at 3-month intervals for 21 months. At each sample period, three composite samples, each consisting of 15 cores, 2.5-cm diameter x 20-cm deep, were taken randomly from each replicate plot. Soil from the fumigated subplots and the interbed area was not included in the samples. Seedling samples were taken on three 0.1 m2 quadrats in each fumigated and unfumigated subplot (Fig. 1-1) at the end of the 1980 and 1981 growing seasons. Samples were taken by pressing a steel 15 2 frame (0.1 m x 15-cm deep) into the soil and hand lifting all seed- lings within the frame. An additional 10 seedlings were randomly- sampled from each fumigated and unfumigated subplot for a quali- tative evaluation of charcoal root rot infection. Laboratory and Chemical Analyses Soil samples were air-dried and sieved to pass a 2-mm mesh. Organic matter was determined by loss-on-ignition after combustion of a 25- to 30-gram sample at 550° C for 8 hours. Ash content of the peat was determined similarly. Organic C was determined on the peat by the Walkley-Black wet oxidation technique (Jackson 1958). Soil pH was measured in a 2 : 1 distilled water-to-soil ratio using a standard glass electrode. Total soil N was determined by the micro-Kjeldahl method (Bremner 1965) . Soil samples were extracted with a double acid solution (0.05 N HCL + 0.025 N H2S04, Page et al. , 1965) ; K, Ca, Mg, Cu, Mn and Zn in the extract were determined by atomic absorption spec- trophotometry, and P by a Technicon Autoanalyzer II (Technicon Indus- trial Systems 1978) . Peat and tissue samples were dry ashed and digested in 6 N HCL; K, Ca, Mg, Cu, Mn , and Zn were determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Nitrogen and P in these materials were determined colorimetrically on a Technicon Autoanalyzer II following block digestion (Technicon Industrial Systems 1978) . Seedlings were measured individually for height and stem diameter , and collectively (by 0.1 m quadrats) for oven dry weights. The 16 percentage of mycorrhizal short roots on five seedlings was estimated after a visual scan of the root systems at 7 x magnification. A short root was considered mycorrhizal if it had a hyphal mantle. Incidence of charcoal root rot was determined by a visual analysis of external 2 infection symptoms on the 10 seedlings sampled for this purpose. Statistical Analysis Data analyses were conducted using general linear model pro- cedures in the Statistical Analysis System (Barr et al. , 1979) . The change in soil organic matter over time was characterized by equations generated from individual plot means. Mean soil pH values within sample periods and mean values for the seedling physical and chemical variables were compared using Duncan's multiple range test at a = . 05 (Snedecor and Cochran 1967) . The analysis of variance designs used for com- parisons among treatments are presented in Table 1-1. The technique and sample number were suggested by Dr. D.H. Marx, Director, Institute for Mycorrhizal Research and Development, USD A Forest Service, Athens, GA. This procedure was conducted under the guidance of Dr.. E.L. Barnard, Forest Pathologist, Florida Division of Forestry, Gainesville, FL. 17 Table 1-1. Analysis of variance designs used for treatment comparisons. Variable Source of variation d.f. Variable Source of variation d.f. OM treatment rep (treatment) time time x treatment Seedling J data treatment 8 -error a- rep (treatment) 8 7 fumigation 1 21 fumigation x treatment 3 time x rep (treatment) 56 -error b- fumigation x rep (treatment) 8 residual 480 residual 48 total 575 total 71 pH treatment rep (treatment) time time x treatment Soil 3 data treatment 8 -error a- rep (treatment) 7 time 21 time x treatment time x rep (treatment) 56 -error b- time x rep (treatment residual 192 total total 287 18 Results and Discussion Peat Decomposition Statistical analyses showed that the decline in OM over a 21-month period did not follow a common pattern for the four levels of peat application treatment, thus requiring each treatment to be evaluated separately. The data were examined by generating equations that de- scribed the mean course of decomposition (Fig. 1-2). Analyses showed that the control and Peat 1 (22.4 mt/ha) data were neither linear nor quadratic, and are thus best described by horizontal lines. Both the Peat 2 (44.8 mt/ha) and Peat 3 (67.2 mt/ha) levels showed only linear trends. OM percentages measured immediately following peat application were lower than expected from the amounts applied. The expected and observed percentages were 1.64 and 1.43, 2.29 and 1.95, and 2.94 and 2.48 for Peat 1, 2, and 3, respectively, or about a 15% reduction. Two possible causes of this discrepancy are (a) the peat application may have been less than estimated, or (b) the plow-down process placed some peat below the 20-cm sample zone. In any case, the discrepancy does not affect the hypothesis or results of the study. The last consequential organic addition to the study site had been the cover crop plowed down 14 months previously. Hence, the indigenous soil organic matter at the beginning of the study was as- sumed to be relatively stable. It proved remarkably so, with the 19 ro CM - O Q. Q.Q. Q. • • • I • h i fe lO O if) o cO cvj -: - U311VIAI OINVOdO % 0) a; 5 k H GO o a) o E u o — K ro"D — c o < r~» o (A 5k« LD C c CN lO _l (U = II a. a. < T3 oj ro 2-Q 4-> CVJ CE m*- a) — UJ 01 o I W a. K ,1" U. c.° rs < ro ai s O CO x •- oi o H c o • •j in in 3 o — o z 1 CO o o 2 |m CM 8? a; 2? II ' £ >- ro *J2 rs •f o -w ro ro E a. a. U CO o 'E w m ~ cn = O a. «- m CD . !- rN 3 20 control treatment showing no measurable decrease in OM over the 21-month period (Fig. 1-2). Likewise, the higher total OM content of the Peat 1 treatment appeared constant, presumably because cumu- lative decomposition of the added peat was too small to be detected against background variability of both soil and intermixed peat. In contrast, the Peat 2 and 3 treatments display the expected cumulative decrease despite high variability (Fig. 1-2). The slopes appear linear, with the higher rate having the steeper slope. This indicates that decomposition rate is proportional to application rate. Thus, optimizing residence time of peat in soil may be best achieved by smaller applications at frequent intervals rather than by less frequent large additions. The latter is consistent with the findings of Lund and Doss (1980). They observed that organic matter content of plots treated with 90, 180 or 270 mt/ha (wet weight) of dairy manure all reached a common level in approximately 70 months. Such a time requirement obviously must vary with both the soil environment and composition of the added organic material. Perhaps by coincidence, however, the projected slopes of the Peat 2 and 3 treatments would indicate return to the level of the control in 64 and 74 months, respectively. The latter extrapolation is highly speculative but emphasizes the moderate loss rate. In contrast, a hypothetical curve used as an illus- tration by Davey and Krause (1980) proposed that two-thirds of a 20 mt/ha addition of peat would be lost in the first year. A further comparison is with the loss rates revealed by subsidence studies in cultivated peat land in south Florida (Knipling et al.r 1970). 21 Carbon dioxide evolution from each 1% OM (ash free amounted to -1 1.58 mt/ha • yr . Calculated loss rate from the Peat 2 treatment in _i the present study is roughly similar, 1.65 mt/ha . yr for each 1% OM initially added as peat (i.e., exclusive of native soil OM). In the present study, as with most field studies, variability limits precise determination , as is illustrated by the scatter of observed OM values around the generated lines in Figure 1-2. Spatial variability was reduced by intensive soil sampling. The influence of other sources of soil variability, however, including seedling lifting, discing, bed reestablishment and seasonal differences in decomposition rates can neither be eliminated nor accounted for. Although decomposition of the peat used in this study is relatively slow, its high N content (3.31% on an ash -free basis) and narrow C/N ratio nevertheless make it a major source of N for plant growth. More- over, this N becomes available gradually, i.e., it is a "slow release" N, which accords well with the year long growth period of pine seedlings. Thus, assuming net N mineralization to have been proportional to de- composition, i.e., no further reduction in C/N ratio, the Peat 2 and 3 treatments released approximately 179 and 257 kg /ha N, respectively, over the 21-month period. These amounts compare with 141 kg /ha inorganic N added by routine fertilization practice to the two seedling crops grown in this period. Actual rates of N mineralization from added peat are yet to be determined by specific studies. It is clear, however, that any comparison of peat with other organic materials must consider N supply as well as contribution to soil OM . 22 Effects on Soil Chemical Properties Soil reaction. The mean pH values at the various sample periods are presented in Table 1-2. Because rainfall, intermittent fertilizer additions and irrigation with high Ca water affect soil reaction, the most meaningful analysis is comparison among treatments at the same sample date. The immediate effect of peat application on soil pH re- flects its own low pH, 4.5, and the very low exchange capacity of the mineral soil. At the time of application, each 1% increase in OM de- creased pH by .3 unit. Twenty-one months after application, the buffering effect was even more pronounced, with pH decreasing .6 unit for each 1% OM. A range in pH values from 5 to 6 is considered satisfactory for most coniferous species (Armson and Sadreika 1979). In this study, pH values in the unamended plots showed relatively high seasonal fluc- tuations (5.5 - 6.1) with an overall mean pH near 6. In contrast, the Peat 1, 2 and 3 treatments showed slightly less fluctuation and main- tained overall pH values of 5.5, 5.3 and 5.1, respectively. Additional measurements of soil pH in the study plots will determine the persistence of the peat treatment effects. Soil nutrient status. Statistical analyses of chemical data from samples of unfumigated soil taken initially and at the end of the first and second growing seasons show significant effects due to treatment and sample time, with no interaction (Table 1-3). Peat treatments in- creased N and Mn levels; the N was obviously from the peat itself , and the Mn increase was probably due to increased Mn solubility at the lower pH levels after peat additions. The changes in nutrient status over time 23 Table 1-2. Soil reaction as influenced by peat amendment. Months after application Treatment Initial 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 -pH- Control y 5.9 1/ Peat 1 6.0 Peat 2 6.0 Peat 3 6.0 5.6 a- 5.5a 5.7a 5.5a 5.6 a 6.1a 5.8a 5.8a 5.5a 5.3b 5.7a 5.5a 5.4b 5.8ab 5.7a 5.5b 5.3b 5.2b 5.3b 5.0b 5.3b 5.7b 5.5b 5.3b 5.2b 4.9c 5.1b 4.9b 5.2c 5.4c 5.4b 5.1c - Peat 1, 2, 3 refer to application rates. 2/ - Two probable causes of the lower pH in the control plots after peat application are slight contamination with peat from adjacent treated plots during the incorporation process and the pre-plant fertilizer application. A slight increase in OM was also observed in the control plots after peat incorporation. 3/ Values in each column which have the same letter are not significantly different (Duncan's, a = .05 ). 24 Table 1-3. Soil nutrient status as influenced by peat application and time of sampling. Nutrient- N P K Ca Mg Mn Zn ppm 2/ Treatment- Control 209 a.-1 48 24 149 8 4.7a .44 Peat 1 367 ab 43 22 194 11 5.2 ab .43 Peat 2 518 be 44 24 192 10 5.6b .44 Peat 3 695 c 40 24 180 11 5.6 b .45 Months after application- 0 441 40 a 32 a 192 ab 12 a 5.0 a .36 a 9 480 40 a 20 b 140 a 7b 5.0 a .38 a 21 421 51b 18 b 205 b 11 a 5.8b .60b - N = total. Other elements extractable by .025 N H2SC>4 + .05 N HCI. - Averaged over samples taken initially, and 9 and 12 months after peat application. - Values in subcolumns with the same letter or no letter are not signi- ficantly different (Duncan's, a = .05). - Averaged over peat treatments in unfumigated soil. 25 reflect management practices. Accumulations of P, Mn and Zn are from inorganic fertilizer additions. Losses of K and Ca in the first year may- be due in part to crop uptake, but most likely are due to leaching with nitrates mineralized from the peat. A comparison of nutrient status in fumigated and unfumigated soil 21 months after peat application showed significant effects of both peat and fumigation without significant interaction (Table 1-4) . The difference in peat treatments follows a similar pattern as discussed previ- ously (Table 1-3) . The unfumigated plots had lower P and Zn values and higher Mn values than the fumigated plots. The latter may be explained by greater uptake of Mn by seedlings grown in the fumigated plots as compared to seedlings grown in the unfumigated plots (Table 1-9) The differences in P and Zn values cannot be accounted for. The lowering of pH by peat addition would have some influence on nutrient availability. Additionally, peat influences soil nutrient status by its own elemental contribution and by absorption of fertilizer nutrients. Krause has shown the latter effect to be of little consequence. Likewise, with the exception of nitrogen, this peat contained low amounts of most nutrients. These facts are consistent with the small differences among the peat rates in Tables 1-3 and 1-4. Comparison of seedling nutrient contents, however, as discussed in a later section, shows that seedlings from the peat-amended plots contained significantly greater amounts of most nutrients than those in control plots. The apparent stability of soil nutrient levels coupled with greater nutrient removal 1 Krause, unpublished data in Davey and Krause (1980). 26 Table 1-4. Soil nutrient status after 21 months as influenced by peat application averaged across fumigation, and by fumigation1./ averaged across all peat rates. 2/ Nutrient— Treatment N P K Ca Mg Mn Zn ppm Control 192 a.-' 54 a 19 171 9 4.5a .57 Peat 1 379 ab 49 ab 19 208 14 5.1 ab .67 Peat 2 487 be 46 b 19 227 11 5.8b .65 Peat 3 656 c 44 b 18 206 12 6.0b .67 Fumigated 436 51 a 19 202 12 4.9 a .69 a Unf unrig ate d 420 46 b 18 205 11 5.8b .60 b - Second fumigation with 448 kg/ha MC-2 9 months previously. -1 N = total. Other elements extractable by . 025 N H^O^ + .05N HCt. - Values in subcolumns with the same letter or no letter are not signi- ficantly different (Duncan's, a = .05). 27 from the peat-amended plots is circumstantial evidence that peat improved the soil fertility status with respect to meeting crop needs. These results further demonstrate that additions of OM , in this case acid peat, in these sandy, poorly -buffered soils can have a signif- icant effect on conditions for plant growth. Effects on Seedling Development Physical parameters. Seedling development was significantly influ- enced by both peat and fumigation, but without an interaction effect. Shoot height was the only physical parameter that consistently increased in response to peat application (Table 1-5) . This is of little practical interest since operational seedlings often must be mowed during the latter part of the season to avoid excess height. More notable are the stem diameter and dry matter values, which, in both years tended to increase with peat application, although the differences were not statistically significant. The difference in total dry matter between the crops is due largely to lower amounts of fertilizer applied in the second year (see Experimental Design and Conduct) . The effects of fumigation were more apparent, with all physical parameters being greater for seedlings grown in fumigated soil in both years (Table 1-6) . Seeds sown in the fumigated plots germinated slightly sooner and had more rapid cotyledonary growth than seedlings in unfumigated soil, possibly due to nutrient release and pathogen control. Presumably this early advantage in development was carried throughout the growing season. 28 Table 1-5. Physical parameters of two successive crops of slash pine seedlings as influenced by peat amendment averaged across fumigation treatment. Treatment Seedling Height Stem Oven-dry weight Dry Shoot /root reatment numbers d la< ipj5orr Foot matter ratio . 2 no/m cm mm , 2 - g im 1980 Crop Control 210 1/ 23.5 a- 5.6 910 280 1190 3.3 Peat 1 220 23.9 a 5.4 890 250 1150 3.6 Peat 2 190 25.9 b 6.3 1060 300 1360 3.6 Peat 3 200 26.4 b 6.0 1070 300 1370 3.6 1981 Crop Control 320 21.1a 4.0 630-' 180 810 3.5 Peat 1 270 22.7b 4.4 700 180 890 3.9 Peat 2 270 24.0b 4.6 720 190 910 3.8 Peat 3 260 23.3 b 4.6 710 190 900 3.7 -1 Values in columns (within crop year) with the same letter or no letter are not significantly different (Duncan's, a - .05). 29 Table 1-6. Physical parameters of two successive crops of slash pine seedlings as influenced by fumigation 1/ averaged across all peat treatments. Treatment Seedling Height Stem Oven-dry weight Dry Shoot /root number dia. shoot root matter ratio ? / 2— no/m cm mm 9 lm 1980 Crop Fumigated 200 26.0 a- 6.2 a 1070 a 310 a 1380 a 3.5 Unfumigated 210 23.8 b 5.4 b 890 b 260 b 1150 b 3.5 1981 Crop Fumigated 300 a 24.2 a 4.6 a 770 a 210 a 980 a 3.6 Unfumigated 260 a 21.4 b 4.2 b 610 b 160 b 770 b 3.8 1^ Fumigation with 448 kg /ha MC-2. - Values in subcolumns with the same letter or no letter are not signi- ficantly different (Duncan's, a = .05). 30 Chemical parameters, Chemical analyses of the 1981 crop show that peat treatment had no effect on concentrations of P , K, Ca, Mg, Cu and Zn (Table 1-7), but that concentrations of N and Mn were greater in seedlings grown in peat-amended soil (Fig. 1-3). The increased N levels may be due to greater retention of NH.-N by the higher CEC , and certainly by additional N mineralized from the peat during decomposition. The increased Mn levels are associated with increased Mn solubility at the lower soil reaction in the peat treatments (Table 1-2) . The effects of fumigation were evident, with N, P, K, Ca, Cu, and Zn concentrations being greater in seedlings grown in unfumigated soil (Fig. 1-4). Total elemental contents of N , P (Fig, 1-5), Mg, Mn, and Zn (Table 1-8) , as calculated from concentration and shoot weight/ unit area, were greater in seedlings grown in peat-amended soil. Coupled with the fact that neither dry matter production nor extractable soil nutrient concentrations were generally affected by peat treatments, this indicates that peat enhanced nutrient uptake by the seedlings. The larger seedlings grown in fumigated soil had significantly higher total contents of K, Mg, Cu, and Mn (Table 1-9), although concentra- tions were generally lower than those from the unfumigated treatments (Fig. 1-4). In contrast, the N content was greater in seedlings grown in unfumigated soil (Table 1-9) , despite the fact that seedlings from the fumigated soil were heavier (Table 1-6) . 31 Table 1-7. Element concentrations of slash pine seedling shoots grown in 1981 as influenced by peat amendment averaged across fumigation treatment. Treatment T issue concentration P K Ca Mg Cu Zn o o ppm Control .is!' .76 .51 .10 5.1 38 Peat 1 .16 .76 .48 .11 5.2 45 Peat 2 .17 .77 .50 .10 5.4 43 Peat 3 .17 .72 .49 .10 4.9 41 - Values in columns are not significantly different (Duncan's, a = .05). 32 (ujdd) uoi;bj;u90uoo u^j ro I Q. <\J I O I Q. (%) U0^Bj;U90U00 N >- ■° s ro O m U »2£ o s. +- 2 ^ c to « si 01.« "+- ■— ."■5 "~£ c .y £ C Ol S 2 « J2 S (0 ro c E E (U 3 D 0) O 12 T5 T3 £ ro Gi- ro C i- « U) i»E 01 > ro O ro ui i- a, J- |i 33 # D Q I- < to (0 § CO CO fO CM C\J CD O UJ I- < .2 c 01 Ol IS *- o >•> c ^2 O c r - 5 c C 3 Ol O -S! .J2 to g>£ c c to +-1 T3 Ol . LT) — u » LU ^ W ~C a- 2 (tj i -C u Ol 3 LU —2 34 (2UJ/6) 1U91U00 d 00 h- (2uj/6) CO «o ;u9;uoo n RJ — .2 r CO ro — c u V, ._ a; ro C o 0 W 1 ro -jj 0. CD o «J +■' ro c/l V, ? +-1 - ^^ £ f t; in +-' c 1 0L ro 4- ■M 4= o r c in O ,01 ■M C/l C ro 0) Ol a — i_ c F ro o 1 o u <£ u 1 !■ ■ »« o o o o o o o o o o 0 o o o E 00 o o o o o o o o o o o o « o o E CD o — « o »8 <.E *— ' i/i It ~ i S * I* -* !w u 43 jOO i in o "0 c m in 1-1 u c '_ a; ■M (J S ■a OJ c S. - .90) indicated that the overall course of decomposition is linear despite seasonal variations in soil temperature and the dis- turbance incident to seedling harvest and reestablishment. After 18 months, the peat treatments had lost 62, 51 and 51% of the amounts applied at the 1, 2, and 4% rates, respectively ("loss" in this discussion refers only to organic substance) . Thus, the decom- position rate was much more rapid than in the field macroplot study (Ch. 1) where the 1, 2, and 3% treatments lost 0, 21, and 19% of the amounts applied. Possible reasons for the difference between the two studies are discussed later. The respective similarity in loss rate from the two higher applications within both studies, however, confirms that decomposition rate is roughly proportional to the amount added when this exceeds 1%. Linear extrapolation of the regressions in Figure 2-2 indi- cates that OM levels of the 1, 2, and 4% peat treatments would reach that of the control (1.3%) in 29, 35, and 35 months, respectively. In actuality, accumulation of a resistant fraction of OM likely would render the approach to the control level asymptotic. At the end of 18 months, the sludge treatments had lost 51, 54, and 44%, respectively, of the organic content added at the 1, 2, and 4% rates. These values would suggest that the sludge was more resistant ,2«= 1-8 » o n <2 P| O -M £ 8" £.1 T3 *a i- M- o 1& <" §■> 5 ECo O 0) — U l/> .O "0 3 c 5 to o u (0 I- I- = 1-1- t 4-> c c ■- o n s°- II II 01 _ro r- =r (/) \_ 4-1 in 0 4-< 3 T3 3 3 c C £ O *- E r- c c a) a> > E a 6 mm) also produced a clumped distribution of sludge in the soil-sludge mixture. This is probably the major reason why initial OM levels were considerably lower than calculated. Apparently, this affected only the accuracy of the OM levels in the samples taken since the precision of the samples taken over the 18-month period appears good. Laboratory incubation and field studies have shown that decom- position of other sludges is generally more rapid than observed here (Terry et al., 1979; Varanka et al. , 1976; Miller 1974). Thus, sludge decomposition rates observed in the present study may be underestimates. Linear extrapolation of the equations (Fig. 2-2) shows that the OM levels in the 1, 2, and 4% rates would reach that of the control (1.3%) in 35, 33, and 40 months, respectively. Thus, decomposition appears to be somewhat proportional to application rate. Decomposition of the shredded cones proceeded rapidly: 51, 68, and 68% for the 1, 2, and 4% rates, respectively, after 18 months. The 68% loss is the largest of any material applied at 2 or 4%. No explanation can be offered for the lower loss rate at the 1% addition, a reversal con- trary to results with the other three materials. Despite the coarse size 51 (Table 2-1) and outward woodiness of the cone fragments, their internal structure seems susceptible to microbial attack . Extrapolation of the regressions (Fig. 2-2) shows return of OM levels to that of the control in 36, 27, and 27, months, respectively. Losses after 18 months from the 1, 2, and 4% sawdust treatments amounted to 73, 53, and 50%, respectively. The 73% loss was the great- est of those for all materials and rates. Loss from the 2% treatment may be compared with results from a laboratory incubation study (Allison and Murphy 1963) in which 2% fresh slash pine sawdust mixed with soil lost 28% of its carbon in 12 months. This would extrapolate to 42% in 18 months, less than 53% observed in the present study. Extrapolation of the regressions in Figure 2-2 indicates that OM levels in the 1, 2, and 4% treatments would return to that of the control (1.3%) in 25, 34, and 36 months, respectively. If the sludge is excluded from comparison because of the particle characteristics discussed earlier, as well as its very different chemical properties (Table 2-1), then the other three materials rank as follows in respect to decomposition after 18 months (actual percentages in parentheses) : Application Ranking Calculated time rate for 100% decomposition 1% sawdust (73) > peat (62) > cones (51) 25-36 months 2% cones (68) > sawdust (53) ~ peat (51) 27-35 months 4% cones (68) > sawdust (50) ~ peat (51) 27-35 months Only the 1% cone treatment deviates from an overall decomposition rank- ing of 1% > 2% = 4%, within materials, and cones > sawdust > peat, with- in rates. 52 As already mentioned, reasons for the lower decomposition of the 1% cone treatment are lacking. A speculative explanation, however, is that the generally coarse particle size limited the area of soil-particle contact and hence opportunity for initial colonization by higher fungi, which expedite decomposition of lignaceous materials, especially when nitrogen availability is low. Sawdust and the higher rates of cones might have provided more numerous opportunities for such colonization. The somewhat more rapid decomposition of cones, generally, may be attributed to the previous decomposition history of peat and (old) saw- dust. The similarity of the latter two is surprising, however, in view of their very different histories and the great differences between them in nitrogen contents (3.31 vs. 0.198%, ash-free; Table 2-1). As indicated later (Table 2-3), the nitrogen contents of total OM increased (C/N de- creased) as the soil-cone and soil-sawdust mixture decomposed, but never approached that of the soil-peat treatments. Although decomposition at 18 months varied somewhat with material and rate of application, the linear extrapolations for Figure 2-2 suggest that all treatment effects upon soil OM content would disappear by 36 months. Only the 4% sludge treatment would exceed this time and, as noted, the potential decomposition rate of this material may have been underestimated. In general, the results of this study would suggest that where maximizing residence time of applied organic materials is an objective, this may best be achieved by frequent applications at the lowest rate rather than applications of the same total quantity in larger but less frequent additions. Such conclusions, however, must be modified, as indicated below. 53 The question of how well the microplot method predicts relative decomposition of various materials under actual field conditions cannot be answered. Direct comparison is possible only for peat, used in both the field macroplot study (Ch. 1) and the microplots. As noted, de- composition in the macroplots was about 20% after 18 months for the 2 and 3% additions as compared with about 50% for the 2 and 4% rates of the present study . Several factors may have contributed to ac- celerated decomposition in the latter. First among these was the intimate mixing of soil and peat, which could not be duplicated even by repeated field tillage. Additionally, harvest of the first crop and screening to remove roots fragmented the remaining peat particles and thoroughly remixed the soil. It is possible that the bucket framework (40% of the surface area) , or air gaps and interfaces between the microplot mixtures and surrounding soil retarded moisture movement and so led to longer retention after rain or irrigation. Finally, soil samples were taken from 0-30 cm -depth for the microplots versus 0-15 cm for the macroplots. The 15- 30 -cm layer obviously is less subject to severe and rapid drying and may have been more favorable for the higher fungi mentioned earlier. If decomposition of the other organic materials was similarly ac- celerated, then the calculated 25- to 36-month residence time indicated above should be extended 2 to 2\ times, to 5 - 1\ years, to represent field performance. Such duration would allow maintenance of OM levels 2 or 3 times greater than that of the control (1.3%), for example, by heavy additions (45-90 mt/ha) at intervals of 4 to 6 years. 54 Effects on Soil Properties Soil reaction. Soil reactions between pH 5 and 6 are generally regarded as optimum for pine seedling production (Armson and Sadrieka 1979) . The seasonal course of nursery soil pH is affected by nutrient uptake and leaching, by the effects of applied fertilizers and by the cumulative additions of bases in irrigation water. In consequence, statis- tical comparisons were limited to those between materials and rates within each sampling date. Reaction of the unamended control soil increased irregularly from about pH 5.7 to 6.0 at 18 months (Fig, 2-3), presumably reflecting the excess of calcium in the irrigation water over that lost by leaching of unutilized fertilizer nitrogen (as N03 ) and also CI . A total of 141 kg /ha each of N and K-O, as KC 1 , was applied at intervals to the two success- ive pine crops grown in the microplots as described earlier in Chapter 1. Addition of acid peat lowered the pH 0.3 unit for each 1% increase in OM (Fig. 2-3). This effect persisted throughout both seasons with reaction more or less paralleling changes in the unamended control, but at levels reflecting higher CEC. As expected, the high base content and reaction of the sludge initially increased pH of the soil-sludge mixture. This response was abruptly reversed, with the two higher treatments falling from pH 6.6-6.7 to 4.5 at 3 months. Decreases during the first 9 to 12 months can be ascribed to nitrification and rapid leaching of NO~ from a material with a narrow C/N ratio (Table 2-1). The subsequent slow increase is generally similar, although steeper, to that of comparable peat treatments. X « 2 5 8- (0 Q. S- to 0) L (1) +- i- (0 o .2 a, <0 * V) l/l §3 ll a> to o 'E "3 ro w . If* C I/) "g£ « c ,- t <0 "J -I . s_ M O ~s 00 0) °* s- *~ ' 3 a, u- 1- . OS c a> i_ a) 4- 4- T3 >« OJ •*-• Q C u E (0 in 4- c 01 C !/> O E o = C O a; " i- s. r. o +- c i at/) a^ E 2 a ° id * r » ■w ._, _w (0 c (0 56 \ rr - V • • y.-3 - 1- < 1 I i [\\ CL \ \\ 1 ^ 1 1 \ 1 1/ •vr \\ /// ' // ,L /a < o ro _j CL • Se CC Ld H U. 2 < CO ? X N Q i jjLiJ « CH• -Q *- -c £c .2 o £s 3 oo C i- — T3 O c i/) re — +■> 13 C re CM CM CM *J< CO as CM «-H as as m CO i-t CO en cm co cm r» r-» co o en o co CO W C^ i-l I** cm r* p* cm r-* CO O CM CM CO «T m m co CM CM CM m ** en OCT CM fH CM i-H CM CO O CM CM ~* i-t CM CO «* CM CM CO ^< O CO CO en m m as as r»* r-t CO CM CD O CM *T C"^ ,H en cm 300. The relative inertness to rapid decomposition, coupled with low contents of N, P, K, Ca, and Mg, resulted in the sawdust having less chemical influence on the soil and subsequent plant growth than the other materials tested. None of the amendments significantly increased shoot Cu concen- tration (Table 2-7), despite the wide differences in concentration between the sludge (450 ppm) and other materials (3 ppm) . Shoot Mn concen- trations were roughly 2 times greater for the peat, cone, and sawdust 70 treatments, and 5 times greater for the sludge, as compared to the unamended control (Table 2-7) . This difference was roughly pro- portional to the Mn composition of sludge and cones, while not so for peat and sawdust (Table 2-1) , Tissue concentrations of zinc were only 3 times greater in the seedlings from the sludge treatment than from the controls, while the other treatments had no apparent effect. This is despite the fact that sludge contained nearly 100 times more Zn than the cones, which had 3 to 7 times more than peat or sawdust (Table 2-1). Additional Zn was added to the system from fertilizer materials and from the galvanized hardware cloth used to screen out roots when the seedlings were harvested in 1980. The latter contributed zinc to the soil (Table 2-4) and subsequently to the seedlings in 1981. Seedlings from the peat- treated microplots had Zn concentrations 20 to 30% greater than seedlings from the field macroplot study (Ch. 1, Table 1-7). Additionally, soil samples taken at the end of each study from plots which had received the lowest rate of peat showed 4 times more Zn in the microplots (2.4 ppm; Table 2-4) than in the field macroplots (0.67 ppm; Table 1-4). Effects of Mycorrhizae and Incidence of Charcoal Root Rot No visible evidence of charcoal root rot infection was found in any treatment. The influence of treatment on percentage of short roots colonized by ectomycorrhizal fungi is presented in Table 2-8. Peat treatments markedly increased colonization in both years, as compared to the un- amended control. In 1980, the lower rates of sludge treatments had no influence, whereas the higher rate increased colonization, despite the 71 Table 2-8. Approximate percentage of short roots colonized by ectomycorrhizal fungi as influenced by treatments. Material Rate % Short roots colonized 1980 1981 Control 0 37 Peat 1 58 2 70 4 43 Sludge 1 35 2 35 4 62- Cones 1 39 2 37 4 27 Sawdust 1 31 2 27 4 21 1/ 18 44 46 57 38 19 26 43 37 47 36 21 26 1/ Only 12 seedlings were alive at harvest. 72 poor seedling survival. Contrastingly, in 1981 colonization in the low rate treatment was twice as great as for the controls, while the two higher rates showed only slight increases. Colonization at the highest rate of cone addition was lower than the controls in 1980, but in 1981 all rates were superior to the controls. Similarly, all rates of sawdust addition resulted in a smaller percentage of mycorrhizal short roots in 1980, but an increase in 1981. The reduction in colonization by the wide C/N ratio materials (cones and sawdust) may be due to early effects on seedling nutrition. Utility of the Microplot Method The microplot method developed in this study proved to be a satis- factory means of comparing decomposition of various materials at several rates. The significance of such information awaits further comparisons of decomposition in microplots vs. field plots for cones, sludge and sawdust, as was done for peat. A comparison of selected features from the control and peat 2 treatments follows: Decomposition Correlation 1981 seedling development dry weight shoot N Micro Macro Micro Macro Micro Macro Micro Macro % r2 - — g/m2 — % Control 0 0 364 729 1.2 1.1 Peat 2 51 21 .95 .21 504 941 1.3 1.3 Field macroplot data are from unfumigated plots (Ch. 1) 73 This comparison indicates that decomposition was more rapid and measured with greater precision in the microplots than in the large-scale field plots. Reasons for this were discussed earlier. Extrapolating the residence time of peat in the microplots to performance under actual field conditions requires multiplying by a factor of 2 - 2i times. Dry weight of seedlings from the microplots was roughly half that of seedlings from the macroplots. The weight ratio of the control and peat 2 treatment seedlings is roughly proportional in both studies (i.e., microplot, .72; macroplot, .77). Shoot N concentrations in both studies seem to correlate almost directly. Thus, it appears that the microplot method predicts relative differences in seedlings grown in amended and unamended soil. Modifications of the methodology that may improve precision are (a) additional replications, and (b) maintenance of uniform seedling num- ber in each microplot. The latter may be achieved by sowing a 10 to 20% excess of seeds, then thinning to the desired density several weeks after germination. Also, pre-plant fertilizer mixtures could be incor- porated into the soil-OM mixtures to more closely parallel field conditions. The method was inexpensive in terms of materials and was labor intensive for only a few 2 to 3-day periods when the plots were installed and lifted at the beginning and end of the growing season. Because the microplot containers were made of sturdy plastic they can be used in subsequent years. 74 With some modifications as described, the microplot method appears to be a useful means of testing a variety of organic materials, combin- ations, and application rates with respect to OM decomposition, effects on soil chemical properties, and seedling responses. General Conclusion Half or more of the added OM decomposed in the 18-month period of study, regardless of material or rate. The exception was a 44% loss from the 4% sewage sludge application, and here decomposition probably was retarded by coarse particle size and drastic changes in the soil chemical environment. Losses from shredded cones, the only material not subjected to prior decomposition, were greater than from the other three materials, which in turn were roughly comparable. Within each material and rate, decomposition was a linear function of time. In contrast, OM content of the control soil (1.3%) did not change perceptibly. Peat-amended soils maintained a lower reaction throughout the study period. Cones and sawdust had little influence except in the last 3 to 6 months. Reaction in the sludge-treated plots at first increased to above pH 6, then lowered below pH 5 as nitrification occurred. The most notable effects on soil concerned nitrogen transformations. Peat decomposed without appreciable changes in N/OM ratios, and thus served as a source of "slow release" N for seedling uptake over the growing season. The high content of readily mineralized N in sludge resulted in leaching of excess NO~ and concurrent losses of cations, especially calcium. 75 In terms of seedling growth, the most notable effects were first year mortality and high tissue concentrations of Mn and Zn in the sludge treatments. Surprisingly, cones and sawdust did not reduce growth or nitrogen uptake below that of the control despite high C/N ratios in the soil. The microplot method used to test the materials proved satisfactory but could be improved with some modifications. Overall, the response of seedlings, soil chemical properties, and OM residence time varied with organic material and rate of application. Ideally, the nature of these responses should be determined prior to the full-scale operational use of any exogenous organic material. CHAPTER III LABORATORY INCUBATION OF VARIOUS ORGANIC MATERIALS Introduction For many years exogenous sources of organic materials have been used as supplements to cover crops in attempts to maintain the organic matter content of forest nursery soils. Many studies have evaluated the effects of organic matter additions on plant growth and, to a lesser ex- tent, on soil properties (Brown and Myland 1979, Davey 1953, Wilde and Hull 1937). In contrast, with the exception of the notable work by Allison and Murphy (1963), Allison and Klein (1961), Pinck et al. (1950), and Allison et al. (1949), little attention has been given to characterizing the decomposition of various types and application rates of organic mater- ials. Allison and Murphy (1963) concluded that rates of decomposition of sawdust and bark differ markedly with tree species. Since the variety of organic materials available for application to nursery soil differs greatly in physical and chemical properties, field testing of the actual effects on soil and seedlings is eventually necessary. Full-scale field testing, even in small plots, however, requires time and effort, and is subject to variability induced by weather and manage- ment. Such effort and variability would be reduced if laboratory incu- bation of organic materials could serve as a screening test for rates of decomposition. Such a test might also provide more exact information on the course of decomposition than is possible to obtain under field conditions. Accordingly, a laboratory incubation study was designed 76 77 to examine the same materials used in the field microplots (Ch. 2), thus allowing a comparison of the methods. Two additional materials, pulp mill waste and fresh pine bark, were included. Materials and Methods Experimental Design and Conduct The decomposition of peat, old slash pine sawdust, fresh slash pine bark, shredded cones, sewage sludge, and pulp mill waste was evaluated by measuring C0? evolution from mixtures of these materials with a nur- sery soil incubated at 22° C. The soil used was from bulk samples taken prior to peat application in the field macroplot study (Ch. 1). The pine bark and pulp mill waste were obtained from industrial mills, and other materials were the same as used in the prior studies (Ch. 1,2). The mill waste consists largely of short cellulose fibers and wood residues not used in paper manufacturing. All materials were ground to pass a 20 mesh sieve prior to mixing with soil. Table 3-1 presents the chemical character- istics of materials and nursery soil. Erlynmeyer flasks (125 ml) were prepared with 100 g of nursery soil mixed with the equivalent of 2 g ash-free organic material (equi- valent to 44.8 mt/ha) and 0.25 g NH^NOg. The mixtures were then wetted to field capacity. Peat and mill waste were also added at rates of 1 and 3 g of ash-free material/ 100 g of soil. Controls were prepared identically but without organic addition. Three replicates of each treatment, includ- ing controls and blanks (empty flasks) resulted in a total of 36 flasks. These were arranged in a completely randomized fashion. 78 Table 3-1. Chemical characteristics of organic materials and un- amended soil pH 1/ Ash Material C N C/N P K Ca Mg Cu Mn Zn -— - % — ppm Unamended soil 5.3 39 0.7 0.02 35 44 35 149 9 u 5 0.4 Peat 4.5 14 53.7 2.85 19 160 90 1250 415 3 5 2 Sludge 6.7 24 42.7 5.69 3 23900 2750 15500 4690 450 84 1249 Cones 6.2 1 56.5 0.30 188 215 3400 225 405 3 28 14 Sawdust 4.5 4 61.6 0.19 324 25 55 325 70 3 9 4 Bark 4.0 1 53.4 0.17 314 100 410 1575 . 215 2 12 13 Mill waste 3.1 30 39.0 0.19 205 621 __3/ ~ - P, K. Ca, Mg, Cu, Mn, Zn are expressed as extractable (.05 N HC1 + . 025 N H2SO^ for soil and total for organic amendments. - Not determined. - These elements were not determined due to lack of a suitable ashing procedure for this material. 79 The incubation system followed the basic procedure described by Stotzky et al. (1958). Each incubation flask was connected by plastic tubing to two 2.5 cm x 20 cm glass test tubes (Fig. 3-1). The first tube was a precaution against the possible back-flow. The second con- tained 20 ml 0.1 N NaOH to absorb C02. Air supplied to the incubation flasks was scrubbed of G02 and humidified by passing through flasks containing 0.3 N NaOH and water, respectively. The possible influences of moisture and available N and C on limiting microbial respiration in the flasks were examined near the end of the study. Each flask received 1.5 ml H2 (/> i/i 0) > c o *J (0 12 3 U V c 0 <4- TO c r 03 r * 0 0) -C c w o 1/1 F J 0 <.. (U s_ (0 L. 0 a IU 03 TJ c o > a) 01 u .0 3 01 u c >- 03 L. 4- o 03 < 0 J3 03 (/> +■> <4- o L 3 u to 03 m E 4- 0) O r u *~ l/l !^ 0 1 no a o: <_ L. +■' 3 r 0) o LL U 31 summed by month. The monthly means were compared using Duncan's multiple range test (Snedecor and Cochran 1967). The analysis of variance designs used for comparisons are presented in Table 3-2. Results and Discussion CO, Evolution as Influenced by Amendment Mean monthly C02 evolution varied considerably among materials (Table 3-3) . All treatments showed an initial flush of microbial activity due in part to re-wetting the air-dried soil. After 1 month, sludge and mill waste had evolved six times, and the other materials two times more CO? than the control. Thus, the soil itself was responsible for only part of the total CC- output, with the remainder due to the material, presumably from the most easily decomposed fraction. The mill waste and sludge evidently had larger fractions of easily oxidized C than the other materials. Although not measured, the sludge and mill waste must have increased pH of the mixtures (Table 3-1), and unlike the nursery environment, there was no leaching of NOg . Hence, the several mixtures created very different chemical environments. It is probable that the high pH mixtures favored high bacterial populations. Differences during the second and third months were more pro- nounced, with CO„ evolution rates following the order: mill waste > sludge > bark ~ cones ~ sawdust > peat > control. This pattern remained fairly stable for the remainder of the incubation time (Table 3-3) but the magnitude of the differences became smaller. This, coupled 32 Table 3-2. Analysis of variance designs used for comparisons of CO. evol- ution among materials and rates. One month is the sum of 4 weeks. Material comparison Rate comparison Source d.f. Source d.f. Treatment 6 Rate 2 Rep (treatment) 14 — error a — Rep (rate) 6 Month 6 Month 6 Month x treatment 36 Month x rate 12 Month x rep (treatment) 34 --error b-- Month x rep (rate) 36 Total 146 Total 62 83 Table 3-3. Monthly (4 week) CO evolution from 100 g of nursery soil incubated with 2 g (ash free) organic material from several sources. Month Control OM source Peat Sludge Cones bawdust bark Mill waste 1 24.9 d- 41. 7cd 176.7 a 63.5 c 59.6 c 58.7 c 134.4 b 2 2.7 a 6.2 e 64. 3 b 18. 5 cd 13.4 d 22.3 c 156.5 a 3 2.2 e 4,7 e 31.6 b 13.2 c 9.6 d 13.1c 141.0 a 4 1.3 d 7.6 cd 20.2b 7.8 cd 12.0 c 7.6 cd 73.2 a 5 ** 3.7b 8.5b 12. S b 10.7 b 9.7b 3.2b 31.7 a 6 10.4 b 15.2 ab 18.4ab 20 . 4 ab 19.8 ab 9.3b 37.3 a 7 4.3b 3.0 ab 16.8 ab 8.6 ab 9.9 ab 8.5 ab 20.2 a 3 47.7 53.4 48.0 39.0 41.0 56.1 45.9 I 1-7 49.5 91.9 341.1 142.8 134.0 123.2 594.3 - Values in rows with the same letter are not significantly different (Duncan's, a = .05) . * 1.5 ml HO added at week 17. ** 0.1 g NH NO, in 2 ml HO added at week 19. *** 135 mg glucose in 1 ml HO added at week 27. 84 with greater variability among replicates for unknown reasons, resulted in greater error and hence less precision in identifying differences in the later months of incubation. Bark, cones, sawdust and peat reached an approximate steady state of CO„ evolution in 1 month, the sludge in 2\ months, and the mill waste not until 4 months. At the beginning of the fifth month the series of additions described in the Methods section were made to determine what factor was limiting microbial respiration. There was no response to the water addition at 17 weeks, indicating that moisture was not limiting respiration. Additional N at week 19 increased C02 evolution by 18% in mill waste, and up to 190% in bark (Table 3-3, months 5 and 6). Al- though the relative increases between the fifth and sixth month were large, the absolute amounts of C02 evolved were small with respect to the initial carbon addition. The immediate, and more or less uniform increase in CO production in all treatments upon addition of glucose in week 27, demonstrates that available carbon had been a limiting factor (Table 3-3, month 8). Examination of cumulative C02 evolution (Fig. 3-2) shows that after 7 months the percentage of added carbon remaining was as follows: mill waste, 89.7; sludge, 93.0; sawdust, 98,2; cones, 97.8; bark, 98.2; peat, 99.1. Although the amount of carbon oxidized appears low, given the length of the incubation period, the results parallel those of Allison and Klein (1961) for wood and bark particles of several conifer species. They found that less than 7% of the added carbon was oxidized during a 2-month period. They suggested two explanations: (a) salt concen- tration from nitrates, and (b) acidity resulting from nitrification. >< - t: o u r~- 0) (1) D) m <■**_ L. 3 I h (T3 mm r— 01 ™ F 0 ■~ C fc LO ra II ,J ( ) • V a; ai c 7) » •~ o F 7, -* +■> o a> (1) J a a) o n- n S > 2 +j rs ° CL o u X '_ .a T3 V > 1 -C T3 II O 3 rn Jtf I F CQ 3 E U JZ 4-* in (N -J (N $ ■a c 1 ■a 0) T3 C 3 03 in II (V O z OT 01 F ■a I LL tD LO -d 86 2 CO OC0CO Q. O (^ CD 10 ^j- ro C6uj) ^00 3A!i^|nujno u| 87 The same factors may have reduced C02 evolution in the current study given the liberal amount of N supplied as NH4NO„. An additional factor may have been a reduction in gas exchange due to fine organic particles accumulating on the soil surface and reducing the pore sizes at the soil- air interface. For example, the CO„ evolved from the sludge treatment was roughly half of that measured by Agbim et al. (1977) when incubating various mixtures of spruce sawdust and sewage sludge in soil. In that study, sludge alone (22.4 mt/ha) + soil lost 28% of the added carbon in 1 year, whereas in the current study the 44.8 mt/ha rate lost 7% in 7 months. The percentages of added carbon lost are equivalent to the percent OM lost, which for the materials are as follows: mill waste, 10.3; sludge, 7.0; sawdust, 1.8; cones, 2.2; bark, 1.8; peat, 0.9. The considerably lower decomposition rates in this study as compared with those of Fig- ure 2-2, indicate that the incubation procedure underestimates the decomposability of the materials when subjected to field conditions. Comparison of materials, moreover, shows that sludge decomposed more rapidly than cones, sawdust, and peat, whereas in the microplot study (Ch. 2) sludge was more resistant than cones, and roughly equivalent to sawdust and peat. Considering that the materials in the incubation study were finely ground, the above results add support to the sug- gestion that sludge decomposition in the microplot study was reduced by coarse aggregate size of the sludge particles which limited contact with the soil. Differences between the two studies are presumably due to the very differrent environmental conditions under which decomposition occurred. These conditions include temperature, moisture and chemical regimes, as well as more variable microbial populations in the field study , in- cluding rhizosphere populations. Since the incubated materials were not subject to leaching, mineralized ions, NO~ , and H+ accumulated. This may have resulted in concentrations unfavorable for higher fungi. C0„ Evolution as Influenced by Amendment Rate Comparisons of CO„ evolution among the three rates of peat or mill waste show only a few differences which occurred between 2 and 5 months (Table 3-4). Subsequently, unexplained experimental variability pre- vented large mean differences among rates from being declared significant (Table 3-4, months 6 and 7). Examination of cumulative C02 evolution (Fig, 3-3) shows the per- centages of added carbon lost as follows: peat 1, 0.2; peat 2, 0.9; peat 3, 1.0; mill waste 1, 11.4; mill waste 2, 10.3; mill waste 3, 7.5. Thus, as application rate increased, peat decomposition rate increased while that of mill waste decreased. Losses from the corresponding ap- plication rates in the field microplot study (Ch. 2, 4% rather than 3%) after 7 months are as follows: peat 1, 24.1; peat 2, 19.8; peat 4, 19.8. The corresponding application rates in the full-scale field study (Ch. 1) show decomposition rates after 7 months as follows: peat 1, 0; peat 2, 7.0; peat 3, 6.3. The magnitude of the losses are very different among 89 Table 3-4. Monthly (4 week) CO, evolution from 100 g of nursery soil incubated with 1, 2, and 3 g (ash free) peat or pulp mill waste. Month Material Rate Peat Mill waste 2\ 3% 1% 2% 3% 1 1/ 36. 4±' 41.7 48.7 100 134 121 2 4.3 b 6.2a 6.5a 68 b 156 a 141 a 3 3.1b 4.7a 4.7 a 43 c 141 a 133 b 4 1.1b 7.6 a 4.9 ab 40 b 73 a 87 a 5 ** 0.0b 8.5 a 8.8 a 35 32 63 6 2.3 15.2 22.6 41 37 61 7 4.6 8.0 18.9 27 20 40 *** 8 48.0 53.4 51.5 49 46 54 Z 1-7 51.8 91.9 115.1 354 593 646 I1 Within rows and within materials, values with the same letter or no letter are not significantly different (Duncan's a - .05). 1.5 ml HO added at week 17. ** 0.1 g NH NO in 2 ml H20 added at week 19. *** 135 mg glucose in 1 ml H20 added at week 27. 90 rOcvJ — rOOJ — = q.0. a. O 01 Is- CO in 0 > C o (0 3 a. % <-i (0 03 V-X c 0) 0, l/l <_ "> 3 L m O £ "0 0) r\i ~ i/> o E u 0 7i <1> 03 > J 0. OJ +■> \- 0) m 3 s o a 3 0) ^ u 03 z ro <1) T 1 (1) -1- r 01 +■« "0 3 r 0> rn J ■~ 0 91 the studies, and decomposition in the microplot study (Ch. 2) was great- est at the 1% application rate but conversely in the other two studies. Nevertheless, the studies agree in showing similar rates of loss from the two higher rates, respectively. Utility of the Method for Predictive Purposes A simple, easily maintained incubation system such as the one used in this study may be useful for initial characterization of organic materials being considered as prospective nursery soil amendments. Although an extrapolation to field conditions is limited, the results nonetheless provide comparative data on amounts of easily oxidized C and effects of application rates on decomposition. The results of this study indicate that unaltered tree components, such as bark, sawdust and cones, have similar decomposition rates. In contrast, sludge and mill waste, although subjected to previous chemical and biological degredation, have considerably greater carbon oxidation rates. Relative to the other materials, peat oxidizes slowly — which is consistent with the results of the field microplot study (Ch. 2). The present study also shows that the residence time of added C varies with the source and rate of application as demonstrated in Chapter 2. The laboratory incubation procedures as used in this study did not provide reliable estimates of the decomposition rates of the same organic amendments tested under field conditions. A suggested modification of the procedure would be to reduce the nitrogen applied and to inter- mittently mix the soil + OM mixtures to increase surface area and facilitate gas exchange. LITERATURE CITED Abbott, H. G., and S. D. Fitch. 1977. Forest nursery practices in the United States. J. For. 75:141-145. Agbim, N. N., B. R. Sabey, and D. C. Markstrom. 1977. Land ap- plication of sewage sludge: V. carbon dioxide production as influenced by sewage sludge and wood waste mixtures. J. Env. Qual. 6:446-450. Allison, F. E. 1965. Decomposition of wood and bark sawdusts in soil, nitrogen requirements, and effects on plants. USD A Ag. Res. Serv. Tech. Bull. 1332. 58 p. Allison, F. E. 1973. Soil organic matter and its role in crop production. Elsevier Scientific Publ. Co., Amsterdam. 637 p. Allison, F. E., and M. S. Anderson. 1951. The use of sawdust for mulches and soil improvement. USDA Ag. Res. Admin. Bur. Pit. Indus., Sis. 5 Ag. Eng. Div. Soil Mgmt. 5 Irrig. 18 p. Allison, F. E., and C. J. Klein. 1961. Comparative rates of decomposition in soil of wood and bark particles of several softwood species. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 25:193-196. Allison, F. E., and R. M. Murphy. 1963. Comparative rates of decomposition in soil of wood and bark particles of several species of pines. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 27:309-312. Allison, F. E., M. S. Sherman, and L. A. Pinck. 1949. Maintenance of soil organic matter: I. Inorganic soil colloid as a factor in retention of carbon during formation of humus. Soil Sci. 68:463-478. Armson, K. A., and V. Sadreika. 1979. Forest tree nursery soil manage- ment and related practices (metric edition) . Ontario Ministry of Nat- ural Resources, Toronto. 179 p. Barr, A. J., J. H. Goodnight, J. P. Sail, W. H. Blair, and D. M. Chilko. 1979. SAS user's guide. 1979 ed. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina. 494 p. Brady, N. C. 1974. The nature and properties of soils. Eighth ed. Macmillan Publ. Co., New York. 639 p. Bremner, J. M. 1965. Total nitrogen. P. 1149-1179 in C. A. Black (ed.) Methods of soil analysis. Amer. Soc. Agron. , Madison, Wisconsin. 92 93 Broadbent, F. E. 1948,, Nitrogen release and carbon loss from soil organic matter during decomposition of added plant residues. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 12:246-249. Brown, G., and T. Myland. 1979. Addition of organic matter to nursery soil. Tree Planters' Notes 30(1) : 14-15. Brown, P. L., and D. D. Dickey. 1970. Losses of wheat straw under simulated field conditions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34:118-121. Burd, J. S. 1918. Peat as a manure substitute. Calif. Agr. Exp. Stn. Circ. 203. 10 p. Davey, C. B. 1953. Sawdust composts: Their preparation and effect on plant growth. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 17:59-60. Davey, C. B., and H. H. Krause. 1980. Functions and maintenance of organic matter in forestry nursery soils. P. 130-165 in Proc. North Am. For. Tree Nursery Soils Workshop, July 28- August 1, 1980, Syracuse, New York. Davis, J. H. 1946. The peat deposits of Florida: Their occurrence, development and uses. Florida Geol. Bull. No. 30. 247 p. Feustel, I. C, and H. G. Byers. 1933. The decomposition of hydro- lytic peat products including ammoniated peat. USD A Tech. Bull. No. 389. 32 p. Gouin, F. E. 1977. Conifer tree seedling response to nursery soil amended with composted sewage sludge. Hort. Science 12:341-342. Iyer, J. G., and F. E. Morby. 1979. Correction of humus deficiency in nursery soils by direct application of alder sawdust. Tree Planters' Notes 30(3): 30-33. Jackson, M. L. 1958. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Engle- wood Cliffs, New Jersey. 498 p. Kalisz, P. J., and E. L. Stone. 1980. Cation exchange capacity of acid forest humus layers. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44:407-413. Knipling, E. B., V. N. Schroder, and W. G. Duncan. 1970. C02 evolution from Florida organic soils. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Fla. Proc. 30:320-326. Kononova, M. M. 1961. Soil organic matter. Pergamon Press, Oxford, New York. 450 p. 94 Lee, Y. S., and R. J. Bartlett. 1976. Stimulation of plant growth by humic substances. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 40:876-879. Lohnis, F. 1926. Nitrogen availability of green manures. Soil Sci. 22: 253-290. Lunt, H. A. 1955. The use of woodchips and other wood fragments as soil amendments. Conn, Ag . Exp. Stn. Bull. 593. 46 p. Lunt, H. A. 1961. Improving nursery soil by addition of organic matter. Conn. Ag. Exp. Stn. Circ. 219. 8 p. Lund, Z. F., and B. D. Doss. 1980. Residual effects of dairy cattle manure on plant growth and soil properties. Agron. J. 72:123-130. Magdoff, F. R., and J. F. Amadon. 1980. Nitrogen availability from sew- age sludge. J. Env. Qual. 9:451-454. Miller, R. H. 1974. Factors affecting the decomposition of an anaero- bically digested sewage sludge in soil. J. Env. Qual. 3:376-380. Page, N. R., G. W. Thomas, H. F. Perkins, and R. D. Rouse. 1965. Procedures used by state soil testing laboratories in the southern region of the United States. South. Coop. Ser. Bull. 102. 49 p, Parker, D. T. 1962. Decomposition in the field of buried and surface applied corn stalk residue. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc, 26:559-565. Pinck, L. A., F. E. Allison, and M. W. Sherman. 1950. Maintenance of soil organic matter, II. Losses of carobon and nitrogen from young and mature plant materials during decomposition in soil. Soil Sci. 69:391-401. Pritchett, W. L. 1979. Properties and management of forest soils. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 500 p. Raney, W. A. 1960. The dominant role of nitrogen in leaching losses from soils of humid regions. Agron. J. 52:563-566. Russell, E. W. 1973. Soil conditions and plant growth. Tenth Ed. Long- mans Green Co., Ltd., London. 849 p. Sain, P., and F. E. Broadbent. 1977. Decomposition of rice straw in soils as affected by some management factors. J. Env. Qual. 6: 96-100. Schnitzer, M., and S. U. Khan. 1972. Humic substances in the environ- ment. Marcel Dekker , Inc., New York. 327 p. 95 Schnitzer, M . , and S. U. Khan. 1978. Soil organic matter. Elsevier Publ. Co., Amsterdam. Developments in Soil Science 8. Seymour, C. P., and C. E. Cordell. 1979. Control of charcoal root rot with methyl bromide in forest nurseries. So. J. Appl. For. 3:104-108, Snedecor, G. W., and W. G. Cochran. 1967. Statistical methods. Sixth ed. Iowa St. Univ. Press, Ames. 593 p. Sommers, L. E. 1977. Chemical composition of sewage sludges and analysis of their potential use as fertilizers. J. Env. Qual, 6:225-232. Stotzky, G., T. M. Ryan, and J. L. Mortensen. 1958. Apparatus for studying biochemical transformations in incubated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 22:270-271. Sumner, M. E., and J. H. Bouton. 1981. Organic matter maintenance in forest nurseries. Georgia For. Res. Pap. 24. 6 p. Technicon Industrial Systems. 1978. Individual /simultaneous determination of nitrogen and/or phosphorus in BD acid digests (1978 rev.). Ind. Meth. 329-74 W/B. Technicon Industrial Systems, Tarrytown, New York. 9 p. Terry, R. E., D. W. Nelson, and L. E. Sommers. 1979. Carbon cycling during sewage sludge decomposition in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43: 494-499. Thompson, L. G., and F. B. Smith. 1947. Organic matter in Florida soils. Univ. Florida Ag . Exp. Stn. Bull. 433, Gainesville. 15 p. Turk, L. M. 1943. The effect of sawdust on plant growth. Mich. Ag . Exp. Stn. Bull. 26(1): 23. Varanka, M. W., Z. M. Zablocki, and T. D. Hinesly. 1976. The effect of digestion sludge on soil biological activity. J. Water Pollut. Contr. Fed. 48:1728-1740. Waksman, S. A. 1938. Humus-origin, chemical composition, and importance in nature. Second ed. The Williams and Wilkins Company, Balti- more. 526 p . Wilde, S. A., and H. H. Hull. 1937. Use and function of peat in forest nurseries. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 29:299-313. BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Kenneth Richard Munson was born to Floyd Richard and Mary- Louise Munson on September 16, 1952, in San Jose, California. His schooling through the ninth grade was in San Jose, and thereafter in Medford, Oregon. Following graduation from high school there in 1970, he entered Oregon State University and received the Bachelor of Science degree in wildlife science in 1974. Subsequently, he was employed by the U.S. Forest Service as a biological technician, and then employed by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management as a wildlife biologist. In 1977, he returned to Oregon State University and entered graduate school, and earned the Master of Science degree in soil science, empha- sizing forest soils, in 1979. In the same year he continued graduate study at the University of Florida and received the Doctor of Philosophy degree in soil science in December 1982. 96 I certify that I have read this study and that in my opinion it conforms to acceptable standards of scholarly presentation and is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Dr. Earl L. Stone, Chairman Professor of Soil Science I certify that I have read this study and that in my opinion it conforms to acceptable standards of scholarly presentation and is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. 4UJ^ Dr. William L. Pritchett Professor of Soil Science I certify that I have read this study and that in my opinion it conforms to acceptable standards of scholarly presentation and is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Dr. Edward L. Barnard Assistant Professor of Plant Pathology This dissertation was submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the College of Agriculture and to the Graduate Council, and was accepted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy. December 1982 Dean for Graduate Studies and Research UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 3 1262 08553 1936