THE IRISH WOLF-DOG-. " The greyhound ! the great hound ! the graceful of lirnb ! Rough fellow ! tall fellow ! swift fellow, and slim ! Let them sound through the earth, let them sail o'er the sea, They will light on none other more ancient than thee !" OLD MS. DOGS: THEIR ORIGIN AND VARIETIES DIRECTIONS AS TO THEIR GENERAL MANAGEMENT, AND SIMPLE INSTRUCTIONS AS TO THEIR TREATMENT UNDER DISEASE H. D. RICHARDSON, AUTHOR OF " THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THE IRISH FOSSIL DEER," " DOMESTIC FOWL," «TC ETC WITH NUMEROUS ILLUSTRATIONS ON WOOD. NEW YORK: ORANGE JUDD & COMPACT, AGRICULTURAL BOOK PUBLISHERS, 245 BROADWAY. -* SF A. W. BAKER, ESQ., JUNIOR, OP BALLYTOBIN, CO. KILKENNY. MY DEAR SIR, Permit me to inscribe to you the following pages, with the hope that you will not deem them altogether unworthy of your acceptance. I know that you are, like myself, a warm friend and admirer of the noble animal whose history and habits they are designed to illustrate ; and trust that you will receive, in the spirit in which it is tendered, this, the only tribute in my power to offer, in return for the very kjs-d and valuable assistance you extended to me in the prepara- tion of the work. Believe me, my dear Sir, Your grateful Friend, H. D. RICHARDSON CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. PAO« ORIGIN or THB Doo • 11 CHAPTER II. EARLY HISTORY OF THE Doo 23 CHAPTER III. VARIETIES OF THE Doo — WILD Does. The Dingo of Australia 28 The Kirarahe of New Zealand . 30 The Dhole of India 30 Jungle Koola 3J Wild Dog of China . 38 Aguara of South America. . S> Deeh of Egypt 5i Wild Dog of South America 33 CHAPTER IV. CLASS I.— GREYHOUNDS.— SUBDIVISION A.— ROUGH GREYHOUNDS. Irish Wolf-Dog 36 Highland Deerhound 51 Scottish Greyhound 54 Russian Greyhound 55 Persian Greyhound, two sub-varie- ties 56 Greek Greyhound il Arabian Greyhound 57 V CHAPTER V. GREYHOUNDS.— SUBDIVISION B.— SMOOTH GREYHOUNDS. Common British Greyhound 57 I Turkish Greyhound 61 Italian Greyhound 60 | Tiger-hound of South America 61 CHAPTER VI. SECOND CLASS — GROUP I. Great Danish Dog 62 Spanish Bloodhound 65 African Bloodhound 67 French Matin 68 Feral Dog of St. Domingo 68 Cattle Dog of Cuba 69 Pariah of India....'. 70 Mexican Taygote 70 Florida Wolf-Dog 70 CHAPTER VII. HOUNDS PROPERLY SO CALLED. TheTalbot 71 The Bloodhound 72 The Staghound 74 The Oriental Hound 75 The Foxhound 76 The Harrier. The Otter-hound 78 The Spanish Pointer 78 The Portuguese Pointer 79 The French Pointer 79 The Italian Pointer 79 The English Pointer 80 TheBeaglo 77 i The Dalmatian 81 The Kerry Beagle 77 | The Russian Pointer 8J 10 CONTENTS. TERRIERS. PAGE The Russian Terrier 82 The Scottish, two varieties 83 The Isle of Syke Terrier 83 English Terrier 84 Maltese Terrier 84 PAG 5 South American Terrier 84 Mexican Prairie Dog 85 Turnspit -••• 85 Harlequin Terrier 85 CHAPTER VIII. Newfoundland Dog....' 87 Labrador Dog 89 Italian or Pyrenean Wolf-Dog 91 Pomeranian Dog 92 Hare Indian Dog 92 The Mailed Dog 93 Esquimaux Dog 93 Siberian Dog 93 KanitschatkaDog 93 NEWFOUNDLAND, OR WOLF-DOQ GROUP. Iceland Dog s)4 Greenland Dog 94 Lapland Dog 94 Shepherd's Dog of Scotland, or Colley 94 Shepherd's Dog of England 95 Shepherd's Dog of France 96 Drover's Dog 96 Cur Dog 9C CHAPTER IX. THE SPANIELS. Setter or Land-Spaniel, three varie- I Springer ties 97 | Blenheim.--. Water Spaniel 98 King Charles. Cocker 100 100 100 100 WATER-DOGS. Great Rough Water-Dog ........... 103 Poodle ............................ 103 Little Barbet ...................... 104 LionDog .......................... 10f> CHAPTER X. THIRD GREAT CLASS.— MASTIFFS. Dog of Thibet 105 Dog of St. Bernard, or Alpine Mastiff 106 Spanish or Cuba Mastiff 109 Bulldog 110 Pug-dog Ill British Mastiff. Ill CHAPTER XI. MONGRELS. Lurcher 113 Ban Dog 113 Dropper 113 Bull-terrier 113 Alicant Dog 113 Shock Dog 114 Artois Dog ] 14 Griffin Dog 114 Kangaroo Dog 114 CHAPTER XII. GENERAL MANAGEMENT OF THE DOG, INCLUDING CROPPING, AND THE REMO- " VAL OF DEWCLAWS • 114 CHAPTER XIII. DISEASES OF THE DOG. Rabies 121 Dumb Madness 122 Canker in the Ear 122 Jaundice 123 Worms 123 Mange 125 Distemper 126 Diarrhoea , 126 Costiveness 127 How to bleed 127 Warts 127 DOGS: THEIR NATURAL HISTORY, ETC. CHAPTER I. .INTRODUCTION ORIGIN OF THE DOG. IT is in far remote ages of " The Earth and Animated Nature" that we have to seek for traces of the origin of this noble and generous animal, which, while some have placed the lion, and some the horse, as the first of quadrupeds, has enjoyed the especial privilege and well-merited honor of being, par excellence, the FRIEND OF MAN. This has adhered to him in adversity, since the fall, and through all vicissi- tudes. I should be disposed to award to this animal the next successive place to man in the scale of, at all events, moral being. True that, in physical formation, the various tribes of Simiae and Orans would appear to approximate the most closely to humanity ; but in intellectual development I think they will be generally conceded to be inferior to our noble friend, THE DOG. So nearly akin is the intelligence of the dog to reason, that we are sometimes puzzled to account for the actions which result from it. As Pope says, when apostrophizing the elephant — " 'Twixt that and reason, what a nice barrier ! Forever separate, yet forever near." Essay on Man. But Pope, among the many poets, has also furnished a very remarkable illustration, from its beauty, its celebrity, and, above all, the wideness of its scope, of these high pre- rogatives of the dog, of their universality, and also of their repute — I allude to that far-famed passage in the " Essay on Man" — 12 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. " Lo ! the poor Indian, whose untutor'd mind Sees God in storms, and hears him in the wind, ****** And thinks, admitted to that equal sky, His FAITHFUL DOG shall bear him company." The " many poets" have been alluded to : yes, from the days of Homer, who hymned the fidelity of Argus, the old dog of Ulysses, in the Odyssey, to our own times, when Lord Byron, in his youth, penned the epitaph upon his faith- ful favorite at Newstead ; and the late Thomas Campbell sang, in one of his celebrated ballads, of the old harper by the Shannon and his dog — when the simple tale of Colin and his " poor dog Tray" (the old shepherd and the old shep- herd's dog) was adorned with plaintive verse. The poets of various ages and of various lands would seem to have delighted in commemorating the virtues of this favorite animal, perhaps, in part, as though they recognised with poetic force of perception in their devotion to man, something of the primal love with which man once looked up to his heavenly Father and almighty Friend. If I be not mistaken, this impressive comparison forms the subject of one of Lord Bacon's famous "ESSAYS." Should it be deemed that this prefatory " character and eulogium" of the dog partakes too much of " favor and af- fection," is not, perhaps, scientific enough for a treatise of this nature, I still trust that so much may be conceded to a very zealous author in the commencement of his work, and as such eulogistic notices are not, though rarely, indeed, so richly merited, unusual in history,* they may, perhaps, be allowed in natural history also. Though here, from the nature of the subject, these remarks are necessarily placed first, as prefatory, instead of being introduced in the body of the work, yet may I not be excused, as the moral amiable qualities of the dog are so remarkable and notorious, that they form, in themselves a kind of description of the species, a sort of special grade' of chivalry, giving dogs a rank of honor among animals from the chivalrous character of their many virtues — virtues so numerous and so generally known and experienced, that were they to receive a full degree of tribute, these remarks would extend to the entire limits of my volume ? I therefore humbly crave indulgence for * See Rolliii, for instance, and many others. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 18 mus lingering a little upon this pleasing portion of my theme. ^ It would appear that for some, time, I know not why, (un. less it be explained on the same principle that caused the ostracizing of Aristides, for being called " The Just,") there has been a strange infatuation among natural historians foi withholding from the dog his claims to originality of creation, — for, in short, an "attainder of his lineage;" nearly all who of late have written upon this subject, having zealously endeavored to trace his descent to the treacherous, cowardly, and rapacious wolf, that skulking, scavenger-like marauder, the jackal, or the crafty and plotting fox ; some even referring for his primitive type to the surly hyaena, with that animal's unsocial and indomitable congeners. Some writers, on the other hand, go so far as to admit, that a true and genuine dog was, indeed, originally created among the other tribes of animals ; but they, at the same time, maintain him to have been formed with a wild, un- social, and savage disposition ; and to owe his present posi- tion as the faithful and valued friend of man, to the reclaim- ing power of " human reason," and to a train of adventitious circumstances long subsequent to the creation of the animal world, and consequently to the era of his primitive existence. These are the persons who love to descant upon, as they are pleased to call it, the " glorious, never-to-be-forgotten con- quest of reason over instinct." Cuvier has said, speaking of the dog and his supposed sub- jugation, " C'est la conquete la plus complete, la plus singu- liere, et la plus utile que 1'homme a faite;" and his translator, or rather commentator, Mr. Griffith,* has re-echoed, apparently without attempt at inquiry, " This is the most complete, sin- gular, and useful conquest man has made."f Alas! to this absurd system of blindly following in the wake of the great, we owe much of the ignorance which at present envelopes the study of zoology. Let but a man, by rendering in some one or more instances service to science, obtain a certain position in the world of letters — a certain name — and, be- hold ! we have succeeding writers crouching to his dicta as though they were oracular, and, without taking the trouble of investigating their correctness, adopting his opinions, nay, * Griffith's Cuvier. t Buffon has made a remark almost identical, even in expression, in h« Introduction to the Natural History of the HORSE." 2 14 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. his very errors, with a blind and superstitious reverence. Cuvier was undoubtedly a great, a very great naturalist ; his writings are to be read with reverence and respect, and if we feel disposed to differ from his theories, the feeling should only be given way to after the most careful examina- tion and research. If facts present an equal balance, let us by all means abandon our own skepticism, and yield to the authority of his master genius ; but if facts decidedly pre- ponderate in favor of our doubt, even his great name must not deter us from taking an independent course, and adopting our own views. Cuvier has shown himself a partaker of human fallibility — " Indignor si quando bonus dormitat Homerus." In the case of the fossil deer of Ireland, for instance, he for a long time almost deprived us of our claim to the ex- clusive possession of that stupendous relic of olden time, by describing remains of what he conceived to be the same animal as having been exhumed in France. These remains have since been recognised as belonging to quite a different tribe of animals ; and in this instance also I cannot but ob- serve, that the very obvious difference subsisting between the osseous remains of the animals in question, is sufficient to in- duce caution towards an author who could thus strangely confound them with each other. It was left to Colonel Hamilton Smith to expose Cuvier's mistake — he alone hav- ing the spirit to examine this subject when so great a man had once treated of it, and to remark upon the errors which he found. / To resume, however : so then man boasts of a mysterious control over natural instinct, and that he is able to subdue, reclaim, and conquer for himself what animals he wishes ; and that he further possesses a power of rendering those ani- mals, naturally fierce and estranged from his society, his faithful, willing, and unchangeable servants ! Truly it is a pity that if such a power ever existed, it should be now so utterly lost. I, for one, would be glad, indeed, were it still capable of being exercised. I have spent years in striving to reclaim the wild creatures of the forest ; I have expended upon them my attention and my care ; I have given them much of my time, my affection, and my means ; and yet I have, after all, but succeeded in the partial familiarization of a few individuals, whose offspring have invariably returned to the intractable, ferocious, and feral habits of their race. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 15 And have other experimentalists fared better? How else does it happen that the grim wolf still prowls amidst the gloomy glades of his native forests, that crafty Reynard still preserves his wild and marauding instincts, and that the stealthy jackal is still but the prowling scavenger of the eastern hamlet 1 Why does not the beautiful zebra habitu- ally grace the equipages of our cities ? — why does not the graceful gazelle become the happy and contented ornament of our parks ? Why does the furious bison still roam, in un- shackled grandeur, the wilds of his native plains, while his kinsmen, the patient ox, drew the baggage of the primeval patriarchs, and the Brahminee bull walks in majestic tran- quillity among the topes and lawns of Hindostan, and the placid Indian cow furnishes her nutritious milk to thousands of Gentoos ? I need, I think, hardly observe — as all who read must be already aware of the fact — that far more pains have been bestowed upon endeavoring to reclaim these naturally feral creatures, than we have the slightest proof were ever bestowed upon the imaginary reclamation of those which are asserted to be their descendants. "If," says an eloquent writer in Lardner's Cyclopaedia — " if this power really had been given to us in the sense the assertion evi- dently implies, the instinct of animals would be under the control of man, instead of being immutably fixed by the ALMIGHTY — that power to whom man himself is indebted for his faculty of reason : not, indeed, that it might be made, a.& in this instance, an idle and arrogant boast, but that it should be used to give honor and reverence to his Maker. The more the wondrous works of the Creator are studied, the more will this truth become incontestable — that it is He only who has given to certain animals, or to certain tribes, an innate propensity to live, by free choice, near the haunts of man, or to submit themselves cheerfully and willingly to his domestication." Why should we seek to set limits to the power of HIM who framed the universe ? Why should we seek to affix bounds to the power of that BEING whose power is infinite ? What positive, tangible, or even analogical evidence exists that the dog was not originally formed at the creation ; or that if form- ed then, it was under a feral type, from which it was left, by the Supreme, to the inventive powers of man to reclaim him ? Is it riot far more reasonable to suppose, that a benevolent Deity should have formed the dog for the express purpose of becoming the ever faithful, constant friend and companion of 16 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. man, and one who would remain his friend after the unhappy FALL should have deprived him of the services or society of other animals ? This, however, is too much like mere decla. mation ; let us proceed to something more like proof of my positions. In discussing subjects such as the origin of the dog, it will be evident that direct proof is unattainable ; I must, therefore, be satisfied if I confute the arguments on which my opponents base their theories ; and then it will be more easy to deduce, first, the greater probability, and secondly, the greater plausi bility, of my own views. With the supposed Lupine or Vulpine origin of this animal may be classed the theory which derives him from a feral or wild, yet apparently genuine dog. ' Mr. Hodgson,* for in- stance, thinks that he has discovered a wild dog — the buansu — to have been the primitive type of the whole canine race. Professor Kreischner describes a sort of jackal, preserved in the Frankfort museum, and puts it forward as the type of the dogs of ancient Egypt ; with many other theorists and savants, to all of whom the reasoning which I hope to adduce will, I think, apply, as well as to those who uphold the theory of the Lupine or Vulpine origin. Perhaps the most concise view of the side of the question from which I dissent, is given by Mr. Bell in his " British Quadrupeds." He says : — " It is necessary to ascertain to what type the animal approaches most nearly, after having, for many generations, existed in a wild state, removed from the influence of domestication and association with mankind. Now, we find there are several instances of the existence of dogs in such a state of wildness as to have lost even that common character of domestication, variety of color and marking. Of these, two very remarkable ones are the dhole of India, and the dingo of Australia. There is, besides, a half-reclaimed race among the Indians of North America, and another partially tamed in South America, which deserve pe- culiar attention • and it is found that these races in different degrees, and in a greater degree as they are more wild, ex- hibit the lank and gaunt form, the lengthened limbs, the long and slender muzzle, and the great comparative strength, which characterize the wolf; and that the tail of the Austra- lian dog, which may be considered as the most remote from a state of domestication, assumes the slightly bushy form of * Letters from Africa NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 17 that animal. We have here, then, a considerable approxima- tion to a well-known wild animal of the same genus, in races which, though doubtless descended from domesticated an- cestors, have gradually assumed the wild condition ; and it is worthy of especial remark, that the anatomy of the wolf, and its osteology in particular, does not differ from that of dogs in general, more than the different kinds of dogs do from each other. The cranium is absolutely similar, and so are all, or nearly all, the other essential parts ; and to strengthen still further the probability of their identity, the dog and wolf will readily breed together, and their progeny is fertile. The obliquity of the position of the eyes in the wolf is one of the characters in which it differs from the dog ; and although it . is very desirable not to rest too much upon the effects of habit or structure, it is not, perhaps, straining the point, to attribute the forward direction of the eyes in the dog to the constant habit, for many succeeding generations, of looking forward to its master, and obeying his voice." In my opinion this mode of accounting for the direction of the eye is, to say the least, rather imaginative than philosophical.* But to continue. " Another criterion," says Mr. Bell, " and a sound one, is the identity of gestation. Sixty-three days form the period during which the bitch goes with young ; precisely the same elapses before the wolf gives birth to her offspring. Upon Buffon's instance of seventy-three days — or rather the possibil- ity of such a duration in the gestation of a particular she- wolf — we do not lay much stress, when opposed to the strong evi- dence of the usual period being sixty-three days. The young of both wolf and dog are born blind ; and at the same, or about the same time, viz., about the expiration of the tenth or twelfth day, they begin to see. Hunter's important experiments proved, without doubt, that the wolf and the jackal would breed with the dog ; but he had not sufficient data for coming to the conclusion that all three were identical as species. In the course of these experiments, he ascertained that the jackal went fifty-nine days with young, while tne wolf went six- ty-three ; nor does he record that the progeny and the dog would breed together ; and he knew too well the value of the argument to be drawn from a fertile progeny, not to have dwelt upon the fact if he had proved it — not to have mention- ed it at least, even if he had heard of it." * It is too like an adaptation of Lord Monboddo's Theory, viz. — thai mankind had originally toils, and wore them away by conttant fitting. 2* 18 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOCK Mr. Bell concludes his observations as follows : — :" Upon the whole, the argument in favor of the view which I have taken, that the wolf is probably the original of all the canine races, may be thus stated. The structure of the animal is identical, or so nearly as to afford the strongest a priori evi- dence in its favor. The dog must have been derived from an animal susceptible of the highest degree of domestication, and capable of great affection for mankind, which has been abun- dantly proved of the wolf. Dogs having returned to a wild state, and continued in that condition through many genera- tions, exhibit characters which approximate more and more to those of the wolf, in proportion as tne influence of civiliza- tion ceases to act. The two animals will breed together, and produce fertile young. The period of gestation is the same." To this brief and intelligible summary of the points on which Mr. Bell bases his opinion, I reply in few words : — I. — The expression nearly identical is too vague for phi- losophical discussion, and I consider that I need not therefore reply to this first position at all. To avoid misconstruction, however, I shall assume that Mr. Bell positively asserts identi- ty of structure. I positively deny it. The intestines of the wolf are considerably shorter than those of the dog, evidently marking him as an animal of more strictly carnivorous habits. The orbits are placed higher and more forward in the skull. The proportion between the bones of the hind legs differs — so does the number of toes. The structure of the teeth is differ- ent, these being in the wolf much larger, and the molar teeth of the upper and under jaws being adapted to each other, in the wolf, in a peculiar scissors-like manner, rendering them infinitely more serviceable for breaking bodies — a structure not found in the dog. II. — I deny that the wolf is " susceptiA of the highest degree of domestication, and capable of g*j&|t affection for mankind, which has been abundantly aBved." When has it been proved ? I have seen many 1jp-called " tame wolves," but never one that might be trusted, or that did not, when opportunity offered, return to his fierce nature and wild habits. The whelps, too, produced by these partially domes- ticated wolves, are not in the smallest degree influenced by the domestication of their parents. The Royal Zoological Society of Ireland had, some years ago, in their garutns, Phoenix Park, a pair of very tame wolves. These produced young, which became tame likewise, and in their turn produced cubs. The society very kindly presented me with one of the last NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 19 mentioned cubs, which, though only five we'eks old when I took l.im from his dam, was as fierce and violent in his own little way as the most savage denizen of the forest. I brought up this animal among my dogs ; for them he conceived a con- siderable degree of affection, or respect perhaps, for submission was the most striking feature of his conduct towards them ; and was doubtless induced by the frequent and substantial castigations he received from " Bevis," a noble dog of the true breed of bloodhound ; but beyond this he was any thing but tame. He never, it is true, exactly dared to attack me in front, but he once showed a disposition to do so, when I pulled him down by the tail as he was endeavoring to get over my garden wall. He, however, on several occasions, charged at me from behind, when he thought my attention was otherwise engaged. I was, however, invariably on my guard, ever carried a good stick, and on these occasions the wolf always got the worst of it. He once only succeeded in inflicting a severe bite ; and as by this time I had utterly despaired of making any thing of him — he was about eighteen months old — I sent him about his business. He subsequently fell into the hands of a showman, and assumed his proper position — • the caravan. As to dogs, when accident drives them to subsist on their own resources, thus rendering them wild, I grant the fact of their assuming feral characters ; but as to their thus acquiring, in the course of a few generations, the habit and aspect, or the general similitude of wolves, I humbly conceive it to be an as- sertion only, and one that has yet to be proved. Even such dogs as have been thus driven into feral and independent life, will be found ever ready to acknowledge the control of man, and may, with comparatively little trouble, be induced to re- turn to their allegiance to him. Nor will the whelps of such redomesticated dogs be born wild, as is the case with the cubs of the tamest wolves. It is, in the case of these dogs, circum- stances, and not natural instinct, that have driven them wild ; and, these circumstances ceasing to operate, domestication returns. I would ask another question. How does it happen that the dog is to be met with in every quarter of the globe to which man has penetrated, while the true wolf has never yet been met with south of the equator ? Further, are not several dis- tinct species of wolf admitted to exist ? Is there not more than one distinct species of wolf admitted by naturalists to exist in North America alone ? It has not even been attempted to be 20 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. proved that these species are identical ; their distinctness has been more than tacitly admitted. Yet they resemble each other far more closely than any wolf does the dog. Has the dog, then, been derived from each and all of these wolves, or has the original wolf, origin alike of wolf and dog, been yet prop- erly indicated ? Should not this fact be duly ascertained pri- or to that in question ? Again, are there not numbers of wild dogs — are there not wild canines in South America, Austra- lia, Arabia, India ? — admitted on all hands to be essentially distinct, which no naturalist has as yet attempted to deduce from a common origin; yet are not these far more nearly allied to the dog than to the wolf? Are there not likewise several admitted species of fox ? Why not first clear up these doubtful points, ere proceeding to such as are more remote from the point at issue ? I likewise deny that the wolf and the dog will breed to- gether in a stale of nature. In their native forests they clear- ly will not, or the wild dog would not still remain distinct from the wolf, whose lair is in the immediate neighborhood of his own. Man's efforts and skill, combined with partial domestication, may, indeed, induce a union between them, but naturally they shun each other, and mutually exhibit a strong natural antipathy. Nor will these animals — the wolf and the dog — breed together, unless one of them, at least, be thoroughly domesticated. How else have all attempts to pro- duce a breed between the wolf and Australian dingo so sig- nally failed ? Neither is the simple breeding together of animals, and the fertility of'their offspring, a sufficient proof of identity of spe- cies. Some of our uninquiring naturalists, who are satisfied to follow quietly in the footsteps of their predecessors, may, doubt- less, start at my assertion ; but I am not the less prepared to maintain its truth. Mr. Hodgson (Proceedings of Zoological Society, 1834) has shown that the capra tharal — the goat of Nepaul — and the domestic goat breed together. The hunch- backed zebu of India will breed with our common cattle, and the offspring is prolific. Pallas has stated that in various parts of Russia the sheep and the goat have bred together. The Chinese and the European pigs, differing, according to Mr. Eyton, in important osteological particulars, will do so like- wise ; and in the " Proceedings of the Zoological Society, 1831," page 66, we find the same related of the hare and rabbit. To this I may add, that the mule, the offspring of the horse and ass, haar also produced foals. Now, as to fer. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 21 tility of offspring, I would beg my zoological readers to ob. serve, that it will not prove identity of species, but merely a dose alliance, unless, indeed, when that fertility exists, inter se, between the hybrids themselves ; that the wolf and dog, jackal and dog, fox and dog, will, if proper pains be taken, breed together, I know, for I have proved it ; but I also know that, unless in the case of the wolf and fox, the progeny are sterile ; and also that even in those cases, although capable of reproducing with either dog, fox, or wolf, they are not ca- pable of doing so inter se; this is ai. important fact, and one that I have not yet seen noticed. I might adduce further facts in support of my objections to this Lupine or Vulpine theory, but I feel that I have refuted it sufficiently ; and in the language of the bar, I say, " Our case rests here." I now come to another theory, which has been embraced and supported with equal, if not greater ardor, viz. — that all the known varieties of dog have taken their origin from one originally created variety, and that one the shepherd's dog. Many naturalists, and these natives of different countries, have advanced this theory, and still they have all employed the one designation in indicating their favorite type, viz.-— the shepherd's dog. I must here first take the liberty of in- quiring, what shepherd's dog ? — for shepherds' dogs differ most materially from each other. Bjiffon— as any gallant French- man would — stood up for the originality of the matin, or shep- herd's dog of his own country. Later writers, all copying more or less from him, have adhered to the theory of the sheep-dog origin, while they have forgotten the difference which exists between their own national sheep-dogs, and those indicated by Buffbn. Truly there exists but little similitude between the tailless, woolly-looking animal, the sheep-dog of England ; the fox-like colley of Scotland ; the gaunt and short-haired cur of Ireland ; the matin of Buffon ; the noble, stately, and powerful sheep-dog of the Pyrenees, the guardian of the flocks of the Abruzzi ; the gigantic mastiffs, the herd- dogs of the Himalaya mountains ; and, in short, between va- rious other sorts of sheep-dog, used foi tending flocks in as various portions of the known world. Shall we assume the original type to have been the sheep-dog or matin of France, or the more graceful colley of Scotland ? Are we to believe that a brace of either of these dogs were the progenitors of the entire canine race ? Did the gigantic boar-dog — the noble Newfoundland — the courageous and powerful mastiff— the £2 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. slender and rapid greyhound — the stunted yet formidable bull-dog — the diminutive and sensitive Blenheim spaniel — and the still more diminutive, and now almost extinct, lapdog of Malta — all arise from a brace of curs ? If they did, to what are we to attribute the varieties now existing? We are told, to climate and breeding. As to breeding, how could it operate when there was but a single pair to breed from ? How, if the varieties of dog proceeded but from one original type, could development thus be produced extending beyond the limits of the faculties and powers proper to that type ? Will change of climate ever convert a greyhound into a bull- dog ? Will it truncate the muzzle, raise the frontal bones, enlarge the frontal sinuses, or effect a positive alteration of the posterior branches of the lower maxillary bones ? Or will change of climate, on the other hand, operate to convert a bull-dog into a greyhound, produce a high and slender form, diminish the frontal sinuses, deprive the animal of the sense of smell, at least comparatively, together with courage and other moral qualities depending on organization ? I say noth- ing ; I only ask my intelligent readers, do they believe this possible ? Thus far a very eminent naturalist, Colonel Ham- ilton Smith, goes with me, hand in hand ; all that I have ad- duced he admits, but here we unfortunately part company. Colonel Smith seeks to account for these differences, by call- ing in the intervention of a supposed admixture of wolf, fox, or hyaena, &c. He admits an originally formed dog, and one variety only ; and refers for the alterations that have taken place in him to crossing with these wild animals. Now, I con- sider this theory as even less tenable than that of the wolfish or Vulpine origin of the dog, as the colonel is obliged to bring several races of wild dogs to his aid ; and, may I venture to inquire, where is their origin ? Besides this, we have to refer to the decided antipathy subsisting between these animals in a state of nature, and thus effectually precluding intermixture, unless through human intervention and agency, which clearly was never exerted in that condition for this purpose. For my own part, I am content that the false theories which have been advanced should be overthrown and confuted ; and I am satisfied to admit that an impenetrable veil of mystery appears to hang over the subject, and the suggestions that I am about to advance are submitted to my readers with extreme diffi- dence and reluctance. Whether more than one variety of any species of animals was formed at the Creation is, perhaps, still a question, though NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 23 most naturalists, I must admit, have peremptorily decided to the contrary. I would, for my own part, venture so far as to say that, let it be once granted that the dog was formed prophetically by the Creator in order that he might be the friend and assistant of man, after the fall should have de- prived him of the allegiance of other animals, it is scarcely too much to suppose that two varieties were then formed. One would scarcely seem sufficient for the purpose, while two might have been so ; and by their intermixture and subse- quent breeding, we can readily imagine how the other races might have been produced. I may add that this view is in strict accordance with the divisions into which osteological investigation, and more particularly examination of their skulls, resolve the many varieties of dog with which we are now ac- quainted. I do not, however, see any necessity for insisting on this point — I merely throw out the suggestion. No one can contradict it, neither have we any means of satisfactorily establishing it. An impenetrable veil of mystery hangs over the origin of the dog, that I much fear will never be removed until time itself shall be no more, and we shall become ac- quainted with this amongst other, and, for the present abstruse and dark, mysteries of nature. CHAPTER II. » EARLY HISTORY OF THE DOG. THAT the dog was one of those animals that did not, at the " fall," swerve from their allegiance, but maintained their fidelity to man, can scarcely be questioned. The earlier portions of the sacred writings make frequent mention of him, but ever as a settled, domestic animal, as one that had ever been so from the beginning, and never once hint at his having been reclaimed from a wild state. Had he been so reclaimed, I have no doubt but it would have been noticed, for a far less important event is actually recorded — viz., the discovery of the mode of breeding the mule ; it is only fair, at the same time, to acknowledge that some translators read this word " warm springs," and not mules. We are told that this was that " Anah that found the mules in the wilder- 24 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. ness, while he was herding his father's asses." While herding his father's asses, if my. reading be correct, they were, doubtless, visited by a drove of wild coursers ; inter- course was the consequence, and mules the ultimate result, — a valuable acquisition, doubtless, to the ass, but still not half so valuable as the domestication of so useful an animal as the dog would have been. In the latter part of the Book of Genesis, we find Jacob, when blessing his sons, employing the ferocity of the wolf as a familiar simile. In the account of the departure of the Israelites from Egypt — an event which occurred about two hundred years afterwards — we find the dog familiarly men- tioned, and his watchful powers and barking clearly re- cognised as things of course. " Nor shall a dog open his mouth." I am aware that some may deduce from this very circumstance the opinion that the dog was only a reclaimed wolf, unknown to the world until the period of the Jews' sojourn in Egypt ; and that the Egyptians, eminent as they were for art and invention, had, among other acquisitions, achieved that of the domestication of the wolf, and his con- version into a dog ; I shall not admit any such induction, however. After the flood, and at the dispersion of the pro- jectors of the tower of Babel, the world lost many arts and other acquisitions that they before possessed : the Egyptians were, as far as history can inform us, the first to form them- selves into a nation, after that event, and to cultivate the arts and sciences, or rather, perhaps, to revive former known, but long-neglected studies, It is to the Egyptians, contrary indeed to popular opinion, but no less certainly, that we owe the possession of the horse, and it is likely to them also that we owe that of the dog ; this, however, does not prove that these animals were not previously in a domesticated state, before the flood and the subsequent confusion of tongues at Babel had produced so many striking changes, and thrown so many valuable branches of knowledge into the gulf of oblivion. The few graphic touches with which Solomon, in Proverbs xxx. 31, by a compound epithet, like those in Homer, has described a renowned and noble animal, translated " a grey- hound," invite special notice, in addition to their appropriate- ness, from the recollection of that celebrated monarch's fame for knowledge of God's works, as has been record- ed in 1 Kings, iv. 33 — " And he spake of trees, from the cedar-tree that is in Lebanon, even to the hyssop that spring. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 25 eth out of the wall ; he spake also of beasts, and of fowl, and of creeping things, and of fishes" — from which has been taken the beautiful description of him in " Heber'p Palestine"— " He, the sage, whose restless mind Through Nature's mazes wander'd unconfined ; Who every bird, and beast, and insect knew, And spake of every plant that quaffeth dew." T think that, from the above passage of Proverbs, we may infer that the dog had, by Solomon's time, arrived at many varieties ; and are not the familiar uses of the dog likewise shown forth in Isaiah, Ivi. 10, 11, and in the account of Tobit's dog in the Apocrypha ? From sacred we may, however, turn to profane history. The Egyptians have, from the very earliest ages, held the dog in particular estimation ; and a French writer of much ingenuity furnishes us with a very plausible reason for their predilection. " The Egyptians," says M. Elzear Blaze, " seeing in the horizon a superb star, which appeared al- ways at the precise time when the overflowing of the Nile commenced, gave to it the name of Sirius, [the Barker,] be- cause it appeared to show itself expressly in order to warn the laborer against the inundation. ' This Sirius is a god,' said they — ' the dog renders us service ; it is a god !' Its appearance corresponding with the periodical overflow of the Nile, the dog soon became regarded as the genius of the river, and the people represented this genius, or god, with the body of a man and the head of a dog. It had also a genealogy ; it took the name of Anubis, son of Osiris ; its image was placed at the entrance of the temple of Isis and Osiris, and subsequently at the gate of all the temples of Egypt. The dog being the symbol of vigilance, it was thus intended to warn princes of their constant duty to watch over the welfare of their people. The dog was worshipped principally at Hermopolis the Great, [Chemnis or Ouchmon- nein in modern Arabic,] and soon afterwards in all the towns of Egypt. Juvenal writes : — ' Oppida tota canem (Anubim) venerantur ; nomo Dianam.' [* Whole cities worship the dog, (Anubis ;) no one Diana.'] At a subsequent period, Cynopolis, the < City of the dog,' [now Samallout,] was built in its honor, and there the priests celebrated its festivals in great splendor." 3 26 NATURAL HISTORY OP THE DOG. Other writers say that Anubis was represented as bearing a dog's head, because when Osiris proceeded upon his Indian expedition, Anubis accompanied him, clothed in the skin of that animal. This, however, is at most very dubious, as many writers assert Anubis to have been clothed, on this oc- casion, with the skin of a sheep, and not that of a dog. Be this as it may, the worship of the dog-god rapidly travelled westward, and soon became intermingled with the religious rites of other nations. Lucan says — " Nos in templa tuam Romana acccpirnus lain, semicaneaque decs." (" We have received into our Roman temples thine Isia, and divinities The fire-worshippers of Persia also paid divine honors to the dog, by representing, under his form, the good principle, by whose aid they were enabled to repel the assaults of the powers of evil ; and he is still held in deep veneration by the modern Parsees. The ancient Britons would likewise appear to have held the doe in high respect, for when desirous of framing for themselves titles of honor or distinction, they assumed his name. CM. in the language of the ancient British, signifies a dog; and do we not recollect the noble names of Cunolx -lin, Cynobelin, and Canute ?* According to an eminent author,f the word Khan, a title of dignity in the East, is identical . with Can, and is likewise derived from the idea of a dog. In the Erse, or native Irish, the word Cu signifies at once a dog and a champion. Even the awful gates of Hades were furnished by the ancient poets with a faithful and formidable guardian in the shape of a dog ; but as the task of watching those dreadful precincts was, doubtless, regarded as no ordinary one, Cer- berus, the watch-dog of the Avernian portals, was awunU-rl three heads instead of one, to ensure a triple degree of watch- fulness. Seldom has the dog brought down obloquy upon his name ; but even he, with all his noble qualities, has had his mo- ments of frailty. Cerberus himself .listened to the promptings of sordid appetite, and, like many another sentinel, accepted * Canute was a Dane, and this appellative, therefore, dhows the pounectuoL' between the Celtic and Teutonic or Sclavonic. t Hamilton Smith. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 27 of a bribe, and betrayed his trust. The watch-dogs, too, of the Roman capitol once slept upon their post, — thus, but for the alarm given by the wakeful and clamorous geese, surrendering devoted Rome to the ruthless arm of invading Gaul. A similar failure of- duty is noticed in Scripture, as occurring among the Jewish dogs : — " His watchmen are blind ; they are all ignorant ; they are all dumb dogs ; they cannot bark — sleeping, lying down, loving to slumber. Yea, they are greedy dogs, which can never have enough." — Isaiah, Ivi. 10, 11. According to De La Vega, the Peruvians likewise former- ly worshipped the dog, while, singularly enough, they also ate his flesh at their festivals ; and, according to a modern authority,* this animal is even yet worshipped by the Ja- panese, under a form similar to that of the Egyptian Anubis, and under the name of Amida. Nor are we to forget Virgil, who notices this noble animal in many passages, among which I cannot omit the following : — " Nee tibi cura canum fucrit postrema : sed unft. Veloccs Spartce Catulos acremque Molossum Pasce aero Pingui: nunquarn custodibus illis Nocturnum Stabulis furem, incursusque luporum, Ant impacatos a tergo horrebis Iberos. Snepe etiam cursu timidos agitabis onagros ; Et canibus leporem, canibus venabere damas. Ssepe voiutubris pulsos silvestribus apros Latratu turbabis age us ; montesquo per altos Ingentem clumore premes ad retia cervum." Georgic. Lib. III., Line 404. From the earliest periods the dog has commanded atten- tion and respect — in many instances, as I have shown, even worship ; and in no instance do we find his name confounded with that of the wolf, jackal, or fox : such has not only been the result of my own inquiry, but I am happy to be able to adduce the very high authority of Colonel Hamilton Smith, who writes : — " A thorough philological inquiry would most assuredly show, that in no language and at no period did man positively confound the wolf, the jackal, or the fox, with a real dog." Further particulars relative to the early history of the dog, will be elicited in the course of our description of the several varieties. Kvmpfor. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOO. CHAPTER III. VARIETIES OF DOG. I MAY premise that I shall first treat of the wild dogs ; and that I shall do so as a separate class, which I believe th« n t : be — namely, not domestic dogs run wild, nor yet as the wil.l type of our domestic dog ; but as a separate species, only entitled to consideration in this place, as constituting a linK b« -tween dog and wolf, and as being a species still more nearly allied to the common dog than that animal, althougn by no means specifically identical ; as the cheetah, or hunt- ing leopard — the " felis jubata" — is said to do betut •< -n the f -lines and the canines, resembling the greyhound in general form, and differing from the true felines in not poss retractile claws, &c. The most remarkable of the wild dogs aro — the Dingo of Australia; the Kararahe; the Dhole and Jungle koola of India ; the wild dog of China ; the bush-dog, or Aguara, of South America ; the Deeb of Egypt. Of the so-called wild dogs of Southern Africa, the " canis pictus" of I &c., I shall say nothing in the present volume, as !: N not at all to be considered as dogs, being far more nearly allied to the hyaena. THE DINGO. The Dingo, called by the natives of Australia, "War- ragal," is about the size of a middling foxhound, or from twenty-three to twenty-four inches in height at the shoulder. In form he partakes of many of the characteristics of both dog and wolf, and is not very unlike the cross produced by the intermixture of these two animals. Flis ears are his muzzle pointed, his tail bushy, his coat of moderate length, and his color usually a buff or bay. Many authors assert that the Dingo never erects his tail, but always carries it in a pendent position : it is not so. The Dingo ordinarily carries his tail curled over his back ; it is only when irn- tated or alarmed that he lowers it. I had many opportunities 9f observing a very fine specimen lately in the gard&ns of NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. the Royal Zoological Society of Ireland, Phoenix Park, and I found that a lowering of the tail invariably denoted mis- chief— that member being usually carried over the back.* The Dingo seldom growls, and never barks ; although I must say, that I have known captive specimens chained near do- mestic dogs, to acquire a sort of half howl or yelp, which, apparently a little tuition would have converted into a genuine " bow wow." The Dingo is easily rendered tolera- bly tame ; but is never to be trusted ; if he escape from confinement, he will forget in a moment the lessons of years, and slaughter and rapine will follow in his mad career. This animal is a great scourge in his native country, and is carefully exterminated whenever he approaches a settlement. He is most remarkably tenacious of life, and is a very obsti- nate fighter ; instances are related of the Dingo sustaining a combat with, and ultimately getting away from four or five stout hounds ; and very few dogs can kill a Dingo single- handed : they fight, like the wolf, in silence ; they utter no cry of pain, but, like that grim felon, die as hard as they have lived. Of their power of endurance I may give the following instances, related by Mr. George Bennett, in his " Wanderings in New South Wales." "One had been beaten so severely that it was supposed all the bones were broken, and it was left for dead ; after the person had walked some distance, upon accidentally looking back, his surprise was much excited by seeing the Dingo rise, shake himself, and march into the bush, evading all pursuit. One supposed dead was brought into a hut, for the purpose of undergoing * I can also adduce the authority of Mr. Drewett, of Portobello Cfcr- dens, a person of undoubted experience. 3* 30 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE TOG. decortication : at the commencement of the skinning process upon the face, the only perceptible movement was a slight quivering of the lips, which was regarded, at the time, as merely muscular irritability. The man, after skinning a very small portion, left the hut to sharpen his knife, and re- turning found the animal sitting up, with the flayed integu- ment hanging over on one side of the face." Another traveller* relates anecdotes illustrative of the tenacity of life exhibited by this animal ; but the details are so revolting that I refrain from quoting them. Frequent experiments have been instituted, with a view to procure a hybrid race between the Dingo and the common dog, but without success. Mr. Cunningham notices a hybrid race of this description, as established in New Holland ; but as he has given no specific description, I am dispo^ question the accuracy of his report. Even, how< Mr. Cunningham's suppositions really confirmed, the fact of the Dingo and domestic dog breeding together would not militate in any degree against the truth of my positions — as I have no hesitation in admitting that groups of animals may l>c, though specifically distinct, yet so nearly allied, as to intermix and even produce reproductive offspring. The question as to fertility existing in the offspring of such unions inter *c, must, of necessity, be satisfactorily settled ere identity can b<- suggested. He may have been imposed upon by the nat or may have confounded with such a supposed mongrel race a breed of Dingos of a black and tan color, which ;i more easily tamed than the common variety. Of th- s- tln-n* was a fine pair, about six years ago, in the gardens of the Irish Zoological Society, and they were remarkably gentle. In New Zealand there has been found an apparently feral dog, called by the natives •' KARARAH£," respecting which a tradition exists that he was given to them some centuri. by certain divinities who visited their shores. In aspect, this log very closely resembles the Dingo, but he appears to have been partially domesticated. THE DHOLE. f The Dhole is a native of India, over which peninsula it ex- tends in great numbers, and bears different names in different * Clarke. tThe Dhole a agreeably described in - Williamson's Oriental Field Sports." NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 31 parts. It was originally described by Mr. Hodgson as the Buansu, and by him given the title of Canis PrimcEVus,* as, in his opinion, it was the origin of the domestic dog, (Zool. Pro- ceed., 1833 ;) and in the same volume of proceedings we read a communication addressed to the secretary, and describing a wild dog by the name of dhole, as found in the Presidency of Bombay. The locality of Mr. Hodgson's dog was Nepal, the eastern and western limits of its range being the Sutlctj and Burhampootra. In 1831, Colonel Sykes described a wild dog from the Mah- rattas, which he calls the wild dog of the Deccan. Colonel 9 subsequently compared specimens of his wild dog with that deseribi-d by Mr, Hodgson, and found them to correspond in the most minute particulars, even to the circumstance of wanting the hinder tubercular toothf of the lower jaw, and varying only in quantity and quality of coat — a variation depending clearly on individual peculiarity and on climate. The Dhole, Buansu, or Kolsun — for these names are synony- mous— is about the. size of a small wolf, but is much more powerfully built, its limbs, in particular, being remarkably large-boned, and muscular, in proportion to its size ; its ears are large, and rounded at the tips ; the muzzle is moderately pointed, somewhat like that of the greyhound ; the tail very bushy ; its color is a sandy red, or buff. In habits, these dogs present all the characteristics of fero- cious beasts of prey. They prowl by night and by day in- discriminately, and hunt in packs of from ten to sixty. While in pursuit, they utter a peculiar yelp, and it is on scent, and not on sight, that they mainly depend for success. Their speed is, however, considerable, and their savage courage and endurance render them a terror to the most formidable rangers of the wild. The panther, the wild hull, the tiger, the elephant, fall an easy prey before a pack of dholes. On they swrcp, coming upon their game with the force of an avalanche, and overwhelming their victim in a living torrent. The hunted animal may, indeed, kill many of his enemies ; but he has little time afforded him for exertion, or display of prowess, * Original or primeval dog. t Has any one of my zoological readers ever found the hinder tubercular tooth of the lower jaw absent? If so, I would be thankful for the in- formation. The connection of deficiency of hairy covering with deficiency of teeth, has been already pointed out by that eminent naturalist, Col II. Smith ; but I have met with more instances in opposition to than con- firmatory of his opinion in this resprct. 32 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. for the dead or wounded are hardly missed ere others hava rushed into their places. Colonel Baber says, (Trans. Asiat. Soc.) — " As often as I have met with them, they have been invariably in packs of from thirty to perhaps sixty. They must be very formidable, as all animals aie very much afraid of them. Frequently remains of hogs and deer have been brought to me which have been taken overnight by these wild dogs. The natives as- sert that they kill tigers and cheetahs, and there is no doubt of the fact." It would appear that the Dhole is susceptible of being tamed, if taken young; adults are not to be made any thing of, (Hodgson.) In Ceylon, there is a variety of Dhole of a bay color, very fierce, but more solitary in its habits. In Sumatra, there is a wild dog of smaller size, very like a fox, of an ashy gray color, with sharp muzzle and black whiskers. In Java there exists a wild dog about the size of a wolf, of a brownish color. Colonel Sykes brought a Dhole to England some years ago, and presented him to the Zoological Society of London — the first specimen, I believe, ever brought living to Europe. THE WILD DOG OP CHINA. This dog is very like the Dhole, but is usually less in size, and its ears are smaller and more pointed ; its color is a bright bay. Of its habits in its native country we know little, further than that they are, like those of its Indian congener, at once predatory and gregarious. I saw one that had been brought over to this country, and which appeared exceedingly tame and playful. I found, however, that it was very treacherous, for although it had suffered me to caress it with my hand, and had even taken bread from me, the moment I turned to depart, it plunged after me and snapped at my legs ; fortunately, however, nothing suffered but the cloth of my trousers. I have been told that this wild dog is identical with that of Ceylon, but I want data on whioh to found an opinion. THE AGUARA OP SOUTH AMERICA. When the new world was first discovered, the natives were found in possession of domesticated dogs, very different in ap- pearance from any of the European races ;* and besides these were found several wild canines, called Aguaras. The • la this fact to be lost sight of? NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 83 natives call them bush-dogs, or dogs of the woods, and assert that they are only tame dogs run wild. The wild dog most common in South America is a small, short-legged, stout, fox-like animal, but somewhat larger than the fox. It is often hunted for its skin, and such of its bn-thren as may have been partially reclaimed by the natives, make no scruple of joining in the chase. These dogs are very silent, and are great rogues. They appear, indeed, to thieve from a pure and innate propensity to thievery, for they will steal and hide articles for which they can have no possible use. THE DEEB OF EGYPT. Principally inhabiting Nubia and Abyssinia — the Thous Anthusof H. Smith — ears erect, muzzle not sharpened at the point, lips semi-pendulous, tail short and hairy, color, a mix- ture of dirty white, black, and buff, producing a series of small black spots, caused by the union of the tips of the longer hairs. This dog has likewise been, by some naturalists, re- garded as the origin of our domestic dogs ; and it is certainly of very ancient origin, as has been proved by heads of dogs taken from the catacombs, which evidently belong to a similar variety. Of the habits of the Deeb I have not been able to obtain any very satisfactory information, excepting that it appears more cowardly than wild dogs usually are, and that it is easily tamed, when it becomes very affectionate. Its height is about eighteen inches. We now arrive at the main subject of this volume — THE DOMESTIC DOG. Even when taken in detail, the anatomy of the domestic dog can, perhaps, scarcely be said to differ materially from that of the wolf or the wild dogs, the points in which any dis- crepancy exists not being sufficiently striking to catch any but an experienced eye. Such discrepancies, however, do exist, and when combined with other and important physio- logical facts, are sufficient to establish the non-identity of the canine and lupine families. I have, however, noticed some of these discrepancies already, and it is unnecessary to re- capitulate them here. The dog belongs to the MAMMALIA, or animals possessing teats for the nourishment of their young ; to the CARNIVOBA, «*4 NATURAL HISTORY OP THE DOG. or flesh-eaters — for flesh forms the chief article of his diet, He is digitigrade, for in walking he supports himself on the extremities of his toes, or digits. He is usually grouped with the wolf, fox, jackal, dec., under the generic appella- tion of canis, and is more particularly separated from these animals by the term cards familiaris — the familiar or do- tnestic dog. The dentition of toe dog is as follows : — .n the upper jaw, six incisors, or cutting-teeth ; two canine teeth, or tusks ; six molars, or grinders, on each side. In the lower jaw, six incisors ; two canines ; seven molars on each side. Of the upper molar teeth, three are foist molars, two are tubercular, and one is carnassier, or formed rather for rending than grinding. Of the lower molars, four are false, two tubercular, and one carnassier. In some wild canines, the second tubercular molar-tooth of the lower jaw is constantly wanting, as in the Dholes, &c. ; and in one (Mcgalotis, H. Smith) there exists a redundancy — there being, in the upper jaw, seven molars on each side, and in the lower, eight. The true dog has five toes on the fore feet, and four toes on the hind ; but occasionally a fifth toe occurs on the hind feet — sometimes on one, and sometimes on both. This toe is called the dew-claw, and is usually removed by the sportsman while the animal is young, as its presence is calculated to impede its movements. Some writers speak of this claw as peculiar to certain breeds. I have had much experience in dogs, and regard it as an unquestionable evidence of im- purity of breed, wherever existing.* Various attempts have been made by modern writers to classify the varieties of the domestic dog into groups. A very recent author (Mr. Martin) has adopted the form ana size of the ear as a criterion. Colonel Smith appears to have depended, in a great measure, upon color. These ideas are both very good, when taken as adjuncts to another system of a more philosophical foundation, but are of themselves false and deceptive. • Mongreliam, or impure breeding, will often manifest itself many gen- * cration* after the crott ha* taken place, and when all other appearance of such has been lost NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 35 1 ain disposed to take the lamented Frederick Cimer as ny guide, and to form the varieties of dog into groups, in- Jicaicd by the least variable portion of their oncological structure — craniological development. This arrangement may be formed with great ease and simplicity. All the varieties of the domestic dog are readily divisible into three great classes, as follow : — I. Such dogs as present a convergence of their parietal oones, (the side-walls of the skull, as it were,) and the condyles of whose lower jaw are somewhat below the level of the molar or cheek-teeth of the upper. These present an elongated muzzle, a high and somewhat slender frame, and are far more remarkable for their powers of sight and swift- ness, than for a very high development of the sense of smell. II. The second group consists of dogs which present parietal bones parallel, or at least neither apparently con- vcrgent nor divergent, and the condyles of the lower jaw on a level with the upper molar teeth. These are usually dogs of great sagacity, and generally pdsscss the sense of smell- ing in a very high degree. It is, however, somewhat pre- mature to speak of them, previous to a description of the third group. III. Parietal bones sensibly divergent, and the condyles of the lower jaw much above the line of the upper molar teeth- This group presents a strongly marked contrast to the first, and the varieties of which it is constituted are generally characterized by great bulk of body, by powerful strength, indomitable courage, pugnacity of disposition, and not any very great development of mental powers. Although the varieties constituting this group appear to possess a large development of forehead, the appearance is chiefly owing rather to a thickening of bone in those regions than to such a development of brain as would predicate a high degree of in- tellectual power. The first and third groups present, more especially the former, strong marks of originality ; the second looks very much as if it owed its origin to the intermixture of the first and third. Of the origin of the dog I have, however, said enough ; and I have now only to enumerate and describe his varieties. Under a fourth head I shall describe mongrels, and among them such few cross-breeds as have been found judicious an? | rofitable, and have now, consequently, become almost set- tled varieties. 36 NATURAL HISTOR* OF THE DOO. The first group is represented by the greyhound ; and may appropriately be divided into two sub. varieties, depend it. their distinction chiefly on the length and texture of tli.ir hair. These sub-varieties are the rough, or long-haired— and the smooth, or short-haired. I may enumerate them a.« follows : — Rough Irish wolf-dog, Highland deerhound, Russian greyhound, Scottish greyhound, Persian greyhound, (two sub-varieties,) Greek greyhound, Arabian greyhound. (Common British greyhound, Italian greyhound, Turkish greyhound, Tiger-hound of South America. Although I have here separated the Irish wolf-dog from the Highland deerhound, and from the Scottish greyhound, I have only done so, partly in conformity with g« opinion that I have yet to correct, and partly because these three dogs, though originally identical, are now unquestiona bly distinct in many particulars. That is to say, the modern Highland deerhound, though the descendant of the Irish wolf-dog, yet in some respects differs from what that noble animal was ; and the Scottish greyhound, again, is just as different from his prototype the deerhound. CHAPTER IV. CLASS I. THE GREYHOUNDS. •UBDITmON A. — TUB EOUGH GREYHOUND* Tht Irith Wolf-dog,— Canit Grain* Hibernicut. THIS renowned and redoubted animal, from age to age, in tradition and in song, one of the glories of " The Sacred Isle," and with his kindred unrivalled race, the Irish giant. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 87 deer — her recognised emblem, from among her animated tribes, celebrated and extolled by all authors and lovers of natural history, native and foreign, and of universal i'amc in his own country — has been long ranked in peerless dignity, " facile princeps," at the head of the whole dog family. When the noble dogs of Greece and of India were at the height of their renown among the ancients, those of Erin were not as yet known, though they soon afterwards obtained celebrity. The dogs of Greece appear to have had a strange and mysterious affinity with those of the West. Those ot India have disappeared from our knowledge, and baffled our research, though they, too, probably shared in this affinity, through, perhaps, the often-proposed medium of the Phoeni- cians, or through that of the* Phocsean colony from Asia Minor, (see Herodotus.) Marsilia, in Gaul, the modern Marseilles, (see Moore.) Many derivations of the name greyhound have been suggested, and among others great hound — grey-hound, (from color.) My own impression is, that the true one is Greek hound, grains, and we have rea- son to believe that to that country we are indebted for the race. The great pint at issue relative to the natural history of the Irish wolf-dog, may be stated as being whether he be- longed to the greyhound race, or was of more robust form, approaching that of the mastilf. There are, indeed, indi- viduals who, without a shadow of ground on which to base their opinions, deem him to have been a mongrel, bred be- tween mastitr and greyhound, &c. Of this last-mentioned theory, as it has no fact or authority of any sort to support it, I shall, of course, say nothing — more especially as no such proof is attempted by the advocates of this very singular opinion. In support of the mastiff* doctrine, we have one single modern authority — if, indeed, authority it can be called. About fifty years ago, the late Aylmer Burke Lambert, Esq., read a paper before the Linnoean Society, subsequently pub- lished in the third volume of that Society's Transactions, de- scriptive of some dogs in possession of Lord Altamont, son of the Marquis of Sligo, and stated to have been the old Irish wolf-dog. The dog described and figured by Mr. Lambert is a middling-sized and apparently not very well-bred speci- * I employ the term mastiff only for brevity, and for the sake of direct antagonism to the greyhound doctrine. 58 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. men of a comparatively common breed of dog, called the GREAT DANE, an animal that shall be treated of in this vol- ume in his proper place. Had this been the Irish wolf-dog, re absurd to speak of his scarcity, far less of his KXTIM-. TION ! That Lord Altamont thought his dogs were wolf-dogs, I do not doubt ; and it is very possible that, some g'»n< r back, they might have had a strain of the true breed in them, subsequently lost by crossing ; and I likewise make no doubt but that the' Great Dane, introduced into this country by our Danish invaders, was often used in olden time as an auxiliary in the chase of the savage animals, the wolf in pnrtirular, with which our woods abounded ; but is it not most abs find writers adopting Mr. Lambert's description and figure of his Danish mastiff, and yet adhering to the aneient nomencla- ture of " Canis Grains Hibernicus" — the Irish greyhound ! Nor would these mastiff-like dogs have, alone, proved equal to the task of wolf-hunting. They might, indeed, if fine specimens — but not such as Lord Altamont's — have sufficiently powerful to grapple with their grisly foe ; hut that foe was very swift of foot, and he had first to be caught — a feat that dogs of their heavy make would find it impossible to perform. Wanting the fleetness necessary to run into so swift an animal, they would equally have failed in attempting to run him down by scent. These dogs are of a very lethargic-, sluggish temperament, qualities greatly in tin ir t'i\or as boar- hounds, the purpose to which they are applied in their native country, for if they were too eager or too swift in pursuit of the boar, there would very soon be but few of the pack left alive ; but such qualities would be most unsuitable, in in the chase of an animal characterized by " The long gallop which can tire The hound's deep hate, and huntsman's fire.** It is evident, then, that the desideratum in a wolf-dog was a combination of extreme swiftness, to enable him to overtake his rapid and formidable quarry, and vast strength to seize, secure, and slay him when overtaken. I may here observe that, about five or six years ago, I pub- lished an article on this subject in the «' Irish Penny Journal,"* which every writer on dogs who has published since that time has done me the honor of appropriating, some with full and fair acknowledgment, others with only such a partial ac- • May, 1841. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 39 xnowledgment as was calculated to mislead the reader. I now lay claim to my own property, and finally embody it in .he following pages, with many additions, the result of subse- quent investigation.* Pliny relates a combat in which the dogs of Epirus bore a part. He describes them as much taller than mastiffs, and of greyhound form ; detailing an account of their contests with a lion and an elephant. This, I should think, suffices to establish the identity of the Irish wolf-dog with the far- famed dogs of Epirus. Strabo describes a gigantic greyhound as having been in use among the Celtic and Pictish nations ; and as being held in such high esteem, as to have been imported into Gaul for the purposes of the chase. Silius describes a large and powerful greyhound as having imported into Ireland by the Belgae ; thus identifying the Irish wolf-dog with the celebrated Belgic dog of antiquity, which we read of in so many places as having been brought to Rome for the combats of the amphitheatre. Hollinshed says of tho Irish — " They are not without wolves, and greyhounds to hunt them, bigger of bone and lirnb than a colt." Campion also speaks of him as a "greyhound of great bone and limb." Evelyn, describing the savage sports of the bear-garden, says — " The bull-dogs did exceeding well, but the Irish wolf- dog exceeded, which was a tall greylwund, a stately creature, and did beat a cruel mastiff." Here we have an actual com- parison of powers, which marks the dojr to have been a grey- hound, and quite distinct from a mastiff In the second edition of Smith's " History of Waterford," the Irish wolf-dog is described as much taller than a mastiff, and as being of the greyhound form, unequalled in size and strength. Mr. Smith writes: — "Roderick, King of Con- naught, was obliged to furnish hawks and greyhounds to Hen- ry II. Sir Thomas Rue obtained great favor from the Great Mogul, in 1615, for a brace of Irish greyhounds presented by him. Henry VIII. presented the Marquis of Dessarages, a Spanish grandee, with two goshawks, and four Irish grey- hounds." In the reign of Richard II., lands were still held under the crown, and amongst other families, by that of Eugaine, on * In justice, I must here state that the account in question was only subscribed with my initials, H. D. R. 40 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. condition of the holders keeping a certain number of wolf-dega fitted for the chase. (H. Smith.) Sir James Ware has, in his " Antiquities of Ireland," col- lected much information relative to this dog, from which I give the following extract : — " I must here take notice of those hounds, which, from their hunting of wolves, are commonly called wolf-dogs, being creatures of great strength and size, and of a fine shape. I cannot but think that these are the dogs which Symmachus mentions in an epistle to his brother Flavianus. 'I thank you,' says he, 'for the present you made me of some canes Scotici, which were shown at the Cir- censian games, to the great astonishment of the people, who could not judge it possible to bring them to Rome otherwise than in iron cages.' I am sensible Mr. Burton, (Itinerary of Anton, 220,) treading the footsteps of Justus Lipsius, (Epist. ad Belg. Cent, i., p. 44,) makes no scruple to say, that the dogs intended by Symmachus were British mastives. But, with submission to such great names, how could the British mastive get the appellation of Scoticus. in the ago Symmachus lived ? For he was Consul of Rome in the latter end of the fourth century ; at which time, and for some time heiore, and for many centuries after, Ireland was well known by the name of Scotia, as I have shown before, (Chap. I.) Besides, the English mastive was no way comparable to the Irish wolf- dog in size or elegant shape ; nor would it make an astonish- ing figure in the spectacles exhibited in the circus. On the other hand, the Irish wolf-dog has been thought a valuable present to the greatest monarch, and is sought after, and is sent abroad to all quarters of the world ; and this has been one cause why that noble creature has grown so scarce among us, as another is the neglect of the species since the extinc- tion of wolves in Ireland ; and, even of what remain, the size seems to have dwindled from its ancient stateliness. When Sir Thomas Rowe was ambassador at the court of the Great Mogul, in the year 1615, that emperor desired him to send for some Irish greyhounds, as the most welcome present he could make him, which being done, the Mogul showed the greatest respect to Sir Thomas, nnd presented him with his picture, and several things of value. We see in the public records an earlier instance of the desire foreigners have- had for hawks and wolf-dogs of Irish growth. In a privy seal from King Henry VIII. to the Lord Deputy and Council of Ireland, wherein 'his majesty takes notice, « that at the instant suit of the Duke of Alberkyrke of Spain, (of the Privy Coun. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 41 cil to Henry VIII.,) on the behalf of the Marquis of Desarrya, and his son, that it might please his majesty to grant to the said marquis, and his son, and the longer liver of ti. em, year- ly out of Ireland, two goshawks and four greyhounds; and forasmuch as the said duke hath done the king acceptable service in his wars, and that the king is informed that the said marquis bearethto him especial good-will, he, therefore, grants the said suit, and commands that the deputy for the time being shall take order for the delivery of the said hawks and grey- hounds, unto the order of the said marquis and his son, and the longer liver of them, yearly ; and that the treasurer shaK take the charges of buying the said hawks and hounds.' It is true that British hounds and beagles were in reputation among the Romans, for their speed and quick scent. Thus, Nemesian, in his Cunegcticks : — * - Divisa Britannia mittit Veloces, nostrique orbis venatibus aptos.' ' Great Britain sends swift hounds, Fittest to hunt upon our grounds.' And Appian calls the British hound, \a.% «^vsu7^ocr, a dog that scents the track of the game. But this character does not hit the Irish wolf-dog, which is not remarkable for any great sagacity in hunting by the nose. Ulysses Aldrovandus, and Gesner, have given descriptions of the Cant's Scoticus, and two prints of them very little different from the common hunt- ing-hound. ' They are,' says Gesner, ' something larger than the common hunting-hound, of a brown or sandy spotted col- or, quick of smelling, and are employed on the borders be- tween England and Scotland to follow thieves. They are called sleut-hound.' In the Regiam Majestatem of Scotland is this passage — ' Nullus perturbet aut impediat Canem tras- santem aut homines trassantes cum ipso ad sequendum latro- nes, aut ad capiendum latrones :' ' Nobody shall give any disturbance or hinderance to tracing-dogs, or men employed with them to trace or apprehend thieves or malefactors.' This character no way agrees with the Irish wolf-dog ; and the reader must observe, that when Gesner and Aldrovandus wrote, in the sixteenth century, modern Scotland was well known by the name of Scotia, which it was not in the fourth century, when Symmachus wrote the aforesaid epistle ; and. therefore, the Canis Scoticus described by Aldrovandus and Gesner, were dogs of different species." Thus far we have proved the Irish wolf-dog to have been a 4* 42 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. large1- greyhound, of size and strength far superior to ordinary dogs. The original greyhound was unquestionably a long-haired dog, and the modern smooth-coated and thin animal, now known by that name, is comparatively of recent date. Of this we nave sufficient evidence in the ancient monuments of Egypt, where, as well as in Persia and India, rough greyhounds of great size and power still exist. A dog of the same kind has been described by H. Smith, as well known in Arabia ; and a gigantic rough greyhound was found by Doctor Clarke, on the confines of Circassia, and by him described as identical with our old Irish greyhound. (Clarke's Travels in Russia, Tartar y, and Turkey.) We find that the smooth greyhound was, on its first intro- duction, known as "gaze-hound," being remarkable solely for sight and speed, (H. Smith ;) and in process of time the new appellation became forgotten, and merged in the original and well-known one of greyhound, up to that period given exclusively to the long-haired variety, (H. Smith.) We may then infer, that not only was the Irish wolf-dog a greyhound, but also long-haired. Whence he originally came would, perhaps, be difficult to determine with any precision ; but if I might be permitted to hazard a conjecture, I should refer his origin to Western Asia, where we find a di>tim-t representa- tive of him still existing. From thence he was brought by the Scythij the progenitors of the Scoli, or ancient Irish. Per- haos the best mode of defining the true character of the an- cient wolf-dog, will be to point to his modern representative ; and this can, I conceive, be done without difficulty. I may here quote a writer in the "Penny Cyclopaedia," (Art. Ire- land,*)— " The Scoti, who were in possession of the island at the time of the introduction of Christianity, appear to have been, to a great extent, the successors of a people whose name and monuments indicate a close affinity with the Belgae (a » My friend, George Petrie, the celebrated Irish antiquarian, who haa published an interesting account of Cyclopean architectural remains as found in Ireland, is disposed to connect these remains with the mysterious *f\a in every respect resembled his own, but was superior in size. Mr. Rowan subsequently presented this wolf-dog to Lord Nugent. I suppose this is the dog that Mr. Jesse mentions as having possessed so wondrous a power of detecting, by the scent, the presence of the Irish blood royal !* The Irish wolf-dog forms the subject of several tradit The following, relating to '• Bran," the favorite hound of Fingal, the hero of Macpherson's Ossian, may not prove un- interesting. There are two accounts of this transaction, one given by Mr. Grant, in his work on the Gael, and the other by Mr. Scrope, in his delightful volume on Deer-stalking. They differ in the result of the encounter. I shall adopt .Mr. Sc rone's, deeming it the most authentic. " Fingal agreed to hunt in the forest of Sledale, in company with the Sutherland chief, his cotemporary, for the purpose of trying the comparative merits of their dogs. Fingal brought his celebrated dog Bran to Sutherland, in order to • S<» " Punch/' vol. x., P. 230. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 49 compete with an equally famous dog belonging to the Suther- land chief, and the only one in the country supposed to be any match for him. The approaching contest between these fine animals created great interest ; White-breasted Bran was superior to the whole of Fingal 's other dogs, even to the * surly strength of Luah ;' but the Sutherland dog, known by the full-sounding name of Phorp, was incomparably the best and most powerful dog that ever eyed a deer in his master's forests. " When Fingal arrived in the forest with his retinue and dogs, he was saluted with a welcome that may be translated thus — " « With your nine great dogs, With your uine smaller game -starting dogs, With your nine spears, Unwieldy weapons ! And with your nin« gray, sharp-edged swords, Famous were you in the foremost fight* "The Sutherland chief also made a conspicuous figure, with his followers, and his dogs and weapons for the chase. Of the two rival dogs, Bran and Phorp, the following descrip- tions have still survived amongst some of the oldest people in Sutherland. Bran is thus represented : — 44 « The hind leg like a hook or bent bow, The breast like that of a garron,* The ear like a leaf.' " Such w*ould Fingal, the chief of heroes, select from amongst the youth of his hunting-dogs. Phorp was black in color, and his points are thus described : — " « Two yellow feet such as Bran had; Two black eyes ; And a white breast ; A back narrow and fair, As required for hunting ; And two erect ears of a dark brown red.' " Towards the close of the day, after some severe runs, which, however, still left the comparative merits of the two dogs a subject of hot dispute, Bran and Phorp were brought front to front, to prove their courage ; and they were no sooner untied, than they sprang at each other, and fought desperately. Phorp seemed about to overcome Bran, when his master, the * A stout gelding. 5 £0 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. Sutherland chief, unwilling that either of them should be killed called out, ' Let each of us take away his dog.' Fingal objected to this; whereupon the Sutherland chief said, with a taunt, that ' it was now evident that the Fingalians did not possess a dog that could match with Phorp.' " Angered and mortified, Fingal immediately extended his * venomous paw/ as it is called, (for the tradition represents him as possessing supernatural power,) and with one hand he seized Phorp by the neck, and with the other, which a charmed and destructive one, he tore out the brave animal's heart. This adventure occurred at a place near the Marc h, between the parishes of Clyne and Kildonan, still called 'Leek na Con,' 'The stone of the dogs,' there having l><><-n placed a large stone on the spot where they fought. The ground over which Fingal and the Sutherland chief hunt' First, Lord Eglinton's Major is the only dog he meets which makes Gilbertfield look not singularly fast up to his Second, the race with Dusty Miller, on the last day of the gold cup running, put an end to all skepticism as to Gilbertfield's bottom. The performances of his ancestors, Oscar, Capilly, and Charles James Pox, in the Lanarkshire and Renfrewshire Club, and of Orlando Purioso, Burr, and GiralFe, in East Lo- thian— his own success, during four seasons, in every club to which he belongs, viz., the Ardrossan, Biggar, Clydesdale, Dirleton, and the Lanarkshire and Renfrewshire, (being rough, he is excluded from running at Winchburg,) and his triumph at Eaglesham — and the commenced career of his oflspring, viz., Ocean, Goth, Vandal, Capilly, Harp, Guitar, and Lilly, (one litter,) supply the best of all evidence, that Gilbertfield not only inherits, but can transmit winning blood — the great aim, it is to be presumed, of every sagaciom bitadcr of grey- hounds." — KUmarnock Journal, 1938. TIIE ITALIAN GREYHOUND. The Italian greyhound is, as might be supposed, t native of the country whence it derives its name ; it is a very small, delicate creature, being a miniature portrait of a high-bred greyhound of the very first class ; and it has been occasionally resorted to as a cross, to give greater fineness of form and coat to a coarse stock of the ordinary greyhound. The Italian greyhound is very fleet, but is, of course, too feeble to be of any service in coursing, as he could not hold a hare, if even he succeeded in overtaxing her. I have known some, however, less diminutive than usual, employed successfully in coursing rabbits. They are ex. tremely eager and vivacious, full of life and spirit, and make most engaging p-rts. The Italian greyhound, from beinj? in such esteem wit' the fair sex, fetches a high price — from live to ten guineas being regarded as by no means unusual, if the animal be a highly bred and handsome specimen. Mr. Nolan, of Bachelor's- walk, Dublin, has some of the finest I have ever seen, and also, I think, the smallest grey- hound in the world — a dog, now very old, not exceeding nine NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 6i inches in height. This diminutive creature is beginning to exhibit the moral, as well as the physical infirmities of age ; ne is very testy and irritable, and appears to think himself as well entitled to respect from his canine comrades, and as well able to command it when necessary, as the largest amongst them ; his seems, indeed, " a vast soul in a little carcass." THE TURKISH GREYHOUND. There are two varieties of this dog, both equally destitute of hair, but one being more decidedly a greyhound, and of superior stature to the other. Color, usually a leaden or dusky purple ; stature of the former breed, about twenty, and the latter about twelve inches. Colonel Smith considers this to be the same with the naked dog of Mexico, and the God-dog, formerly worshipped as a deity by the Xauxa and Huanca Indians. This dog is very apt to want the posterior molar teeth, or grinders, at the back of the lower jaw, and sometimes the upper. Colonel Smith suggests, that the absence of hair may be caused by chronic mange. I think this very improbable, and that it is far more likely to be the result of a burning sun, in a very dry atmosphere. THE TIGER HOUND OF SOUTH AMERICA. This is a tall, showy dog, resembling the greyhound close- ly, but somewhat more robustly formed. Color usually a slaty-blue ground, with tan and brown clouds, resembling the markings of the Great Dane. It is, of course, improperly styled " Tiger" hound, as there is no tiger in America — that name being given by the natives to the Jaguar, an animal almost equally dangerous and powerful with his Asiatic congener. The Tiger hound is not courageous, activity being more called for than courage — the latter quality, indeed, being calculated to lead the dogs into unnecessary danger. He usually reaches twenty-eight or twenty-nine inches in height at the shoulder. This dog has not unfrequently been brought to Britain, and passed off as the Spanish bloodhound — a dog which he closely resembles in form, s#ve tha the is more like a greyhound. 6 62 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. CHAPTER VI. 1 us SECOND CLASS of domestic dogs may be most aptly represented by the HOUNDS ; but, from what I have already said in my introductory remarks, it will readily be perceived that not only does this class present less appearance of origin- ality than either of the others, but also that its members will require greater subdivision, in proportion as they, in thrir characters, approach more or less to the first or third classes, viz., to those of greyhounds or mastiffs. Hounds, projx- called, and more properly the true type of this class, must be treated of separately. Among the most striking members of the first doubtful por- tion of this second class of dogs, or those that approx most nearly to the greyhound family — while they are, at tho same time, by no means true greyhounds — I may enumerate The Great Danish Dog, type of this group ; The Spanish Bloodhom, i ; The African Bloodhound ; The French Matin ; The Feral Dog of St. Domingo ; The Cattle Dog of Cuba ; The Pariah, or Indian Street Dog ; The Mexican Dog, or Taygote ; The Wolf.Dog of Florida. THE GREAT DANE.* This is a dog of gigantic stature ; he is, indeed, perhaps, one of the very largest dogs with which we are at presen* acquainted, standing from thirty to thirty-two inches in height at the shoulder, or even more. In form, the Dane is very powerful, but yet graceful ; his head is elongated, but the muzzle does not taper to a point — it is, on the contrary, somewhat truncated, looking as if it had been originally in- tended to be longer, but had been abruptly cut short within an inch of what should have been the muzzle. The coat of the Dane is close and short, and its color, although oc- * I may remind ray readers that this dog has also been set forward ac the Irish Wolf-dog. NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 63 casionally fulvous or yellow, is more frequently a bluish, slaty white, marked with spots, or rather blotches, of brown and black. The ears of the Dane are short, and droop, but very slightly. I never yet saw an imported specimen that had not the ears cropped off* close to the skull. In its native country the Dane is employed chiefly in boar-hunting ; it was also formerly used in the chase of the elk. It is not im- probable that the Danes brought this dog with them to Ireland when they invaded that country, and that it was employed as an auxiliary in wolf-hunting. Once the matter came to a regular grapple, few dogs could have proved more servicea- ble ; and few could have afforded a better cross with our own ancient wolf-dog. That such crossing did actually take place, is more than probable ; and hence the many miscon- ceptions that have since arisen relative to the real characters of our genuine Irish wolf-dog. Hamilton Rowan had some very fair specimens ; so had Lord Altamont — also Lord O'Neil ; but by far the finest I ever had the good fortune to see, was " Hector," the property of his Grace the Duke of Buccleuch, still living, about ten years ago, at Dalkeith palace.* Hector stood a trifle more than thirty-two inches in height at the shoulder ; notwithstanding that when I * Since dead, and preserved by Mr. Carfrae of Edinburgh. 64 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. measured him he was close upon his twentieth year, and consequently much drooped. I had the honor of receiving an interesting communication from the duke respecting him, in which his grace stated, that Hector had been purchased by his brother, Lord John Scott, from a student at Dresden, and that the breed were called, in Germany and Saxony, " boar-dogs." His grace also informed me that Hector waa the tallest dog he had ever seen. Hector was very good-natured, and far from being quarrel. some. He frequently took a walk into the little town of Dal- keith, on which occasions he was often followed by the >• dogs, and they would sometimes even venture upon an at- tack. Until an absolute aggression was made, however, Hector contented himself with proceeding on his way in dignified contempt ; but if a Newfoundland, mastiff, or other dog at all approaching to his own size, dared to meddle with him, he would "turn him up" in a twinkling, and, raising his hind leg, treat him with the strongest mark of canine contumely. I had a son of Hector's, not, however, true bred, but pro- duced from a South American dam, of the so-called tiger- hound breed. "Lincoln" was his name. This was, with- out exception, the best dog I ever knew. In attachment and sagacity he more than equalled the spaniel, and his courage was of the most indomitable kind. Often have I seen him fn.m my window engaged in conflict with two or three large Newfoundland dogs resident in the neighborhood, and have rushed to the rescue, but have as often found him victorious ere I could interfere. Lincoln's only fault was a propensity to kill cats ; and of this he was eventually cured, by one of those animals, at whom he rushed with open mouth, mis- taking his fury for play, and rubbing herself, purring, against the very jaws that were open to crush her. I must here record an instance of this noble dog's sagacity. I was in the habit of bathing every morning at the extremity of the chain pier of Newhaven, about the distance of a mile from where I dwelt. At this time I was a student of medi- cine, and, during the summer months, attended the Botanical lectures of Dr. Graham, delivered in the Botanic Garden, Inverleith-row, on my way home from the sea, and very near the house of my respected and kind stepfather, Dr. Cheyne. I used to take Lincoln with mo on those occasions, and, on my return, used to dismiss him at the garden gate, and go in to lecture. On one occasion I recollected, wheD NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. 65 about half way home, that I had forgotten my towel, in the shed appropriated to the accommodation of bathers at the pier end. More in jest than earnest, I turned to the dog, and said, showing my empty hands, " Lincoln, I have lost my towel, go and seek it." To my surprise, the sagacious creature, after looking for an instant, first at my empty hands, and then at the towel of my companion, turned and set off at a rapid pace back towards Newhaven. At the moment I thought but little of the matter ; for I concluded that the dog would retrace his steps for a short distance, and then re- turn ; but he had not reappeared when I reached the gate of the Botanic Garden : so I entered, and, as usual, heard lecture ; but what was my astonishment when, lecture being over, I left the gardens, and found the faithful and intelligent animal waiting for me, with my missing towel in his mouth. Colonel H. Smith (Nat. Lib. Mam., vol. x.) describes the boar-dog as an allied breed to the Dane, yet not altogether identical with him, and speaks of one that stood " little less than four feet high at the shoulder." It was doubtless so re- puted ; but Colonel Smith did not himself either see or measure the dog in question. I doubt not but that the ani- mal was very tall, but I most strenuously deny any dog being as large as a horse. I am also disposed to the belief that the smooth Dane is the true dog, and his rough brother a cross. Colonel Smith also styles the boar-dog the " Suliot dog." Now Suli is a very limited district of Albania, oc- cupying scarcely six hundred square miles in extent, and lying south, whereas these dogs are natives chiefly of the regions north of the Balkan. I think that Colonel Smith has been led into this misnomer from a hasty view of Gmelin's Latin designation of the great Dane, Cants Suillus, derived evidently from the employment to which the dogs were de- voted, viz., hunting the sus or hog, and not from the locality where they were bred. In the older paintings, the boar-dogs are evidently of the great Danish stock, with a dash of the great rough greyhound ; and probably such were many of our later Irish wolf-hounds, after the original breed had grown somewhat scarce. THE SPANISH BLOODHOUND. This is the dog rendered so infamous by its employment in the chase of runaway negro slaves in South America and the Spanish West Indian Islands. 6* 60 NATURAL HISTORY OF THE DOG. In form it is intermediate between the mastiff and the gieyhound, but approximates more closely to the latter than to the former. Its color is usually tan or liver color ; when pied, the purity of the breed is susceptible of doubt ; the coat is extremely fine ; the ears are semi-erect ; when the animal is excited, they are pricked somewhat forward ; the muzzle and tips of the ears are dark ; the tail is fine as a rush. The Spanish bloodhound stands from twenty-six to twenty- eight inches in height at the shoulder — seldom more, and often less. Columbus, when he invaded America, numbered a staff of twenty bloodhounds as part of his army. More tly, in 1795, a hundred of these fierce dogs were sent to Jamaica from the Havana, to be employed in the Maroon war. Dallas, in his «* History of the Maroons," tells us that General Wai pole ordered a review of these dogs and their chasseurs, or k- • j» MJ principally colored Spaniards, that he rui" nere are two varieties of the common Scotch Terrier. One which stands rather high on his legs, is usually of a sandy-red color, and very strongly made — he stands about eighteen or twenty inches in height, and is commonly called the " Highland terrier." The other is lower, long-backed, and short-legged ; hair more wiry, but not so long as in the former ; mouth also not so broad, and muzzle longer. This latter variety is the dog celebrated by Sir W. Scott as the Pepper and Mustard, or Dandie Dinmont breed. Francis Car- ter, Esq., the same gentleman of whom I have already spo- ken as possessing the deerhouncls, has a pair of beautiful lit- tle Dinmont terriers — about the best, the dog especially, that I have ever seen. THE SKYE TERRIER, So called from its being found in greatest perfection in the Western Isles of Scotland, and the Isle of Skye in par- ticular, somewhat resembles the preceding, but is even longer in the body, lower on the legs, and is covered with very long, but not coarse hair ; its ears are erect, and tufted at the extremities. All the Scotch terriers are "varmint" in the extreme, and are on this account great favorites with young gentlemen when home for the holidays, being equalled by no other breed of dog in the ardor with which they hunt