vOSv c0EV0 LOLI € WONT ~~ a i ‘ . i i " =i) oe j - * > \ - Wr 5 ; f ‘ \ i ont eo, Ps ’ are we! ris i . x (GLISH MEN OF CIENCKH. anal > ao tall “iy @ 68! —). ot Ps i 2 i : INGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE: THEIR NATURE AND NURTURE BY FRANCIS GALTON, F.R.S., AUTHOR OF ‘f HEREDITARY GENIUS,” ETC. London : MACMILLAN & CO. 1874. . CLAY, SONS, PREFACE, I unpEeRTOoK the inquiry of which this volume is the result, after reading the recent work of M. de Candolle,t in which he analyses the salient events in the history of 200 scientific men who have lived during the two past centuries, deducing therefrom many curious conclusions which well repay the attention of thoughtful readers. It so happened that I myself had been leisurely engaged on a parallel but more ex- tended investigation—namely, as regards men of ability of all descriptions, with the view of supplementing at some future time my work on Hereditary Genius. The object of that book 1“ Histoire des Sciences et des Savants depuis deux Siteles.” Par Alphonse de Candolle. Corr. Inst. Acad. Se. de Paris, &e. Gentve, 1873. vi PREFACE. ‘ —" was to assert the claims of one of what may be called the “ pre-efficients” *yof eminent men, the importance of which had been previously over- looked; and I had yet to work out more fully its relative efficacy, as compared with those of education, tradition, fortune, opportunity, and much else. It was therefore with no ordinary interest that I studied M. de Candolle’s work, finding in it many new ideas and much con- firmation of my own opinions; also not a little criticism (supported, as I conceive, by very im- perfect biographical evidence,)* of my published views on heredity. I thought it best to test the value of this dissent at once, by limiting my first publication to the same field as that on which M. de Candolle had worked—namely, to the history of men of science, and to investigate their sociology from wholly new, ample, and trustworthy materials. This I have done in the present volume; and I am confident that * Or, “all that has gone to the making of.” The word was suggested to me. ? Reference may be made to a short review by me of M. de Candolle’s work, in the Fortnightly Review, March 1873. q PREFACE. : vil one effect of the evidence here collected will be to strengthen the utmost claims I ever made for the recognition of the importance of here- ditary influence. A few of my results, and some of the evi- dence on which they were based, were given by me at a Friday evening lecture, Febru- ary, 1874, before the Royal Institution. | have incorporated parts of that lecture into this volume, with emendations and large additions. It had been my wish to work up the ma- terials [I possess with much minuteness; but some months of careful labour made it clear to me that they were not sufficient to bear a more strict or elaborate treatment than I have now given to them. The pleasant duty remains of acknowledging a debt to my friend, Mr. Herbert Spencer, for many helpful suggestions, and for his encour- - agement when I[ was planning this work ; and to reiterate my deep sense of gratitude to numerous correspondents, which I have expressed else- where in the following pages. viii PREFACE. I may add that four of the scientific men who replied to my question’ have passed away since I began to write. Of these, two had sent me complete returns, namely, Professor Phillips, the geologist, and Sir William Fairbairn, the engineer. As regards the other two—Sir Henry Holland, the physician, had published his auto- biography, but he gave me much help collo- quially, and promised more; and Sir Edmund, ~ better known as Count Strzelecki, the Australian traveller and meteorologist, furnished me with | very suggestive information, but too incomplete for statistical use. FRANCIS GALTON. 42. Ruttanp Gats, Vovember, 1874. P.S.—I have to apologise for some faults of style in the earlier pages, due to my not having had as full an opportunity as I had counted upon of correcting that portion of the press. After I had sent the above to the printer, a friend happened to point out to me the fol- PREFACE. ix lowing passage in the “Sartor Resartus” of Carlyle (Bk. i, ch. 2). It expresses sentiments so nearly akin to those which induced me to write this book, that I am glad to quote it :— “ Tt is maintained by Helvetius and his set, that an infant of genius is quite the same as any other infant, only that certain surprisingly favourable influences accompany him through life, especially through child- hood, and expand him, while others lie close folded and continue dunces..... With which opinion, cries Teufelsdréckh, ‘I should as soon agree as with this other—that an acorn might, by favourable or un- favourable influences of soil and climate, be nursed into a cabbage, or the cabbage-seed into an oak. Nevertheless, continues he, ‘I too acknowledge the all-but omnipotence of early culture and nurture: hereby we have either a doddered dwarf bush, or a high-towering, wide-shadowing tree; either a sick yellow cabbage or an edible luxuriant green one. Of a truth, it is the duty of all men, especially of all philosophers, to note down with accuracy the characteristic circumstances of their Education, what furthered, what hindered, what in any way modified ae CONTENTS. CHAPTERL - ANTECEDENTS. Object of book, 1 ; Definition of “‘ Man of Science,” 2; Data, 10; . Nature and nurture, 12 ; Race and birth-place, 16 ; Occupation of parents and position in life, 21; Physical peculiarities of parents, 27 ; Primogeniture, &c., 33; Fertility, 36; Heredity, 39. Pedigrees, viz :—Alderson, 41 ; Bentham, 43 ; Carpenter, 43 ; Darwin, 45 ; Dawson Turner, 48 ; Harcourt, 50 ; Hill, 51 ; Latrobe, 54 ; Playfair, 55 ; Roscoe, 57; Strachey, 58 ; Taylors of Ongar, 60 ; Wedgewood, 62. Statistical results, 64; grand- fathers and uncles of scientific men, 65; brothers and male cousins, 67 ; Family characteristics, 69 ; Distribution of ability in gifted families, 70; Relative influence of paternal and maternal lines, 72. CHAPTER II, QUALITIES, Preliminary, 74; Energy, 75, viz :—much above average, 78 ; below average, 97. Size of head, 98 ; Health, 99 ; of parents, 101; Perseverance, 103 ; Impulsiveness, 104 ; Practical business xil | CONTENTS. habits, 104 ; Memory, 107 ; viz.—good verbal, 109; good for facts and figures, 111 ; for form, 113 ; good, but no particulars given, 117; bad, 120. Independence of character, 121 ; ditto of ‘ the parents, 122 ; small religious sects, 123 ; Mechanical apti- — tudes, 124; Religious bias, 126; definition of religion, 127 ; religious sentiment weak, accompanied with scepticism, 130; _ intellectual interest in religious topics, 130 ; dogmatic interest, 131; religious bias, 131; ditto with intellectual scepticism, 134. Effect of creed on research, 135, viz.—no deterrent effect, 135 ; no dread of inquiry, 136; religion and science have different spheres, 136 ; liberality of early teaching, 137; have early abandoned creeds, 138; creed has had good effect on research, 139; has had some deterrent effect, 140. Truth- fulness, 141. CHAPTER III. ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. Preliminary, 144; Extracts at length, viz :—physics, 149 ; mathe- matics, 155; chemistry, 158; geology, 161; zoology, 165; botany, 176; medicine, 180 ; statistics,.182; mechanics, 184. Analysis of replies, viz. :—tastes strongly innate, 186 ; decidedly _ hot innate, 191; tastes bearing remotely on science, 194 ; innate tastes not very hereditary, 196; fortunate accidents, 198; indirect motives or opportunities, 199 ; professional duties, 202 ; encouragement at home, 205; influence and encouragement of friends, 211 ; ditto of tutors, 215 ; Scotch and English system | of tuition, 215 ; travel in distant parts, 218 ; unclassed resi- duum, 221; Summary, 222; Deep movements in national life, 227; Waste of powers, 228; Partial failures, 230; Genius, 233. oe = CONTENTS. xiii CHAPTER IV. EDUCATION. Preliminary, 235 ; Merits in education, viz.:—generally praised, 238 ; variety of subjects, 242 ; a little science at school, 243 ; simple things well tanght, 248; liberty and leisure, 244 ; home teaching and encouragement, 244 ; Merits and demerits balanced, 245; Demerits in education, viz.:—narrow edu- eation, 246 ; want of system and bad teaching, 251 ; unclassed, 252; Summary, 253; Interpretation of educational needs, 255 ; Conclusion, 258, APPENDIX. List of questions sent to scientific men, 261. ERRATA, : Page 87, line 12, for “30” read “ 50.” Page 78, line 4, in the heading, for “forty cases” read “ two cases.” = ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. CHAPTER I. ANTECEDENTS. Object of Book—Definition of Man of Science—Data— Nature and Nurture—Race and Birthplace—Occupation of Parents and Position in Life—Physical Peculiarities of Parents—Primogeniture, &c.—Fertility—Heredity— Pedigrees—Statistical Results. THE intent of this book is to supply what may be termed a Natural History of the. English Men of Science of the present day. It will de- scribe their earliest antecedents, including the hereditary influences, the inborn qualities of their mind and body, the causes that first in- duced them to pursue science, the education they received and their opinions on its merits. The advantages are great of confining the 7 x iv 2 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [CHAP. investigation to men of our own period and nation. Our knowledge of them is more com- plete, and where deficient, it may be supple-— mented by further inquiry. They are subject _ to_a moderate range of those influences which — have the langest_disturbing power, and_are therefore well fitted for statistical investigation ; lastly, the results we. may obtain are of direct practical interest. The inquiry is a complicated one at the best ; it is advantageous not to com- plicate it further by dealing with notabilities whose histories are seldom autobiographical, never complete and not always -very accurate ; and who lived under the varied and imperfectly appreciated conditions of European life, in several countries, at numerous periods during many different centuries. Definition of “Man of Science.”—I do not 7 attempt to define a “scientific man,’ because no frontier line or definition exists, which sepa- rates any group of individuals from the rest — of their species. Natural groups have nuclei but no outlines ; they blend on every side with | other systems whose nuclei have alien characters. a 1] Nae NTECEDENTS. a et A naturalist must construct his picture /of na- - ture on the same principle that an engraver in mezzotint proceeds on his plate, beginning with the principal lights as so many different points of departure, and working outwards from each of them until the intervening spaces are covered. Some definition of an ideal scientific man might possibly be given and accepted, but who is to decide in each case whether particular indivi- duals fall within the definition? It seems to me the best way to take the verdict of the scientific world as expressed in definite language. It may be over lenient in some cases, in others it may never have been uttered, but on the whole it appears more satisfactory than any other verdict which exists or is attainable. ‘To have been elected a Fellow of the Royal Society since the reform in the mode of election, intro- duced by Mr. Justice Grove nearly thirty years ago, is a real assay of scientific merit. Owing to various reasons, many excellent men of science of mature ages, may~ not be Fellows, but those who bear that title cannot but be considered in some degree as entitled to the B 2 4 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHAP. epithet of “scientific.” I therefore look upon this fellowship as a “pass examination,” so to speak, and from among the Fellows of the Royal Society I select those who have yet further qualifications. One of these is the fact of having earned a medal for scientific work ; another, of having presided over a learned Society, or a section of the British Association ; another, of having been elected on the council of the Royal Society ; another, of being professor at some important college or university. These and a few other similar signs of being appreci- ated by contemporary men of science, are the qualifications for which I have looked in select- ing my list of typical scientific men. I have only deviated from these technical rules in two or three cases, where there appeared good reason for their relaxation and where the returns ap- peared likely to be of peculiar interest. On these principles I drew up a lst of 180 men; most of them were qualified on more than one count, and many on several counts. Also, the list appeared nearly exhaustive in respect to those men of mature age who live in or near London, since = 1.] ANTECEDENTS. 5 other private tests suggested few additions. _ As two of these tests have been proposed by several correspondents, it may be well to describe them. The one is the election of individuals, on account of their scientific eminence, to a certain well-known literary and scientific club, the name of which it is unnecessary to mention. The committee of this club have the power of electing annually, out of their regular turn, ‘nine persons eminent for science, literature, art, or public services. The two or three men who have in each .year received this coveted privilege on the ground of science now amount to a considerable number, and they are all on my list. Again, there are certain dining clubs in connection with the Royal Society, the one meeting on the afternoon of every evening that it meets, and the other more rarely, and there are about fifty members to each of these clubs, the same persons being in many instances members of both. The election to either of the clubs is a testimony of some value to the estimation of the scientific status of a man by his contemporaries ; almost all their members 6 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cuar. are on my list. No doubt, many persons of — considerable position living in Edinburgh, Dub- : lin, and elsewhere at a distance from London, are not among those with whose experiences I am about to deal. But that is no objection ; I do not profess or care to be exhaustive in my data, only desiring to have a sufficiency of — material, and to be satisfied that it is good so far as it goes, and a perfectly fair sample. I do not particularly want a list that shall include every man of science in England, but seek for one that is sufficiently extended for my purposes, and that contains none but truly scientific men, in the usual acceptation of that word. However, I have made some further estimates, and conclude that an exhaustive list of men of the British Isles, of the same mature ages and general scientific status as those of whom I have been speaking, would amount to 300, but not to more. Some of my readers may feel surprise that so many as 300 persons are to be found in the United Kingdom who deserve the title of LJ ANTECEDENTS. 7 scientific men; probably they have been accus- tomed to concentrate their attention upon a few notabilities, and to ignore their colleagues. It must, however, be recollected that all biogra- phies, even of the greatest men, reveal numerous associates and competitors whose merit and influence were far greater than had been sus- pected by the outside world. Great discoveries have often been made simultaneously by workers ignorant of each other’s labours. This shows that they had derived their inspiration from a common but hidden’ source, as no mere chance would account for simultaneous discovery. In illustration of this view it will suffice to mention a few of the great discoveries in this generation. That of photography is most intimately asso- ciated with the names of Niépce, Daguerre and Talbot, who were successful in 1839 along dif- ferent lines of research, but Thomas Wedge- wood was a photographer in 1802, though he could not fix his pictures. As to the origin of species, Wallace is well known to have had an independent share in its discovery, side by side with the far more comprehensive investiga- 8 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENOL. [cmap. tions of Darwin. In spectrum analysis the re- marks of Stokes were anterior to and independ- ent of the works of Kirclihoff and Bunsen. Elec- tric telegraphy has numerous parents, German, English and American. The idea of conserva- tion of energy has unnumbered roots. The sim- ultaneous discovery of the planet Neptune on theoretical erounds by Leverrier and Adams is a very curious instance of what we are con- sidering. In patent inventions the fact of simultaneous discovery is notoriously -frequent. It would therefore appear that few discoveries are wholly due to a single man, but rather that vague and imperfect ideas, which float in conversation and literature, must grow, gather, and develop, until some more perspi- cacious and prompt mind than the rest clearly sees them. Thus, Laplace is understood to have seized on Kant’s nebular hypothesis and Bentham on Priestley’s phrase, “the greatest happiness of the greatest number,” and each of them elaborated the idea he had so seized, into a system. The first discoverers beat their contemporaries — OE —————— — a3, ANTECEDENTS. 9 in point of time and by doing so they become leaders of thought. They direct the intellectual energy of the day into the channels they opened; it would have run in other channels but for their labour. It is therefore due to them, not that science progresses, but that her progress is as rapid as it is, and in the direction towards which they themselves have striven. ~ We must neither underrate nor overrate their achievements. I would compare the small band of men who have achieved a conspicuous scientific position, to islands, which are not the detached objects they appear to the vulgar eye, but only the uppermost portions of hills, whose bulk is unseen. To pursue this meta- phor; the range of my inquiry dips a few fathoms below the level at which popular reputation begins. , It is of interest to know the ratio which the numbers of the leading scientific men bear to the population of England generally. I obtain it in this way. Although 180 persons only were on my list, I reckon, as already mentioned, that it would have been possible to have in- 10 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. __[cmarv. cluded 300 of the ane ages, without descending in the scale of scientific position ; also it appears that the ages of half of the number on my list lie between 50 and 65, and that about — three-quarters of these may be considered, for census comparisons, as English. I combine © these numbers, and compare them with that of the male population of England and Wales, between the same limits of age, and find the required ratio to be about one in 10,000. What then are the conditions of nature, and the various circumstances and conditions of life,— whieh I include under the general name of nurture,—which have selected that one and left the remainder? The object of this book is to answer this question. DATA. My data are the autobiographical replies to a very long series of printed questions ad- dressed severally to the 180 men whose names were in the list I have described, and they fill two large portfolios. I cannot sufficiently 1.] ANTECEDENTS. : 11 thank my correspondents for the courteousness with which they replied to my very trouble- some queries, the great pains they have taken to be precise and truthful in their statements, and the confidence reposed in my discretion. Those of the answers which are selected for statistical treatment somewhat exceed 100 in number. In addition to these, I have utilized several others which were too incomplete for statistical purposes, or which arrived late, but these also have been of real service to me; sometimes in corroborating, at others in ques- tioning previous provisional conclusions. I wish emphatically to add that the foremost members of the scientific world have contributed in full proportion to their numbers. It must not for a moment be supposed that mediocrity 1s unduly represented in my data. Natural history is an impersonal result; I am therefore able to treat my subject anony- mously, with the exception of one chapter in which the pedigrees of certain families are given. 12 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [emar. | NATURE AND NURTURE. > The phrase “nature and nurture” is a con- venient jingle of words, for it separates under two distinct heads the innumerable elements of which personality is composed. Nature is all that a man brings with himself into the world ; nurture is every influence from without that affects him after his birth. The distinction is clear: the one produces the infant such as it actually is, including its latent faculties of growth of body and mind ; the other affords the environ- ment amid which the growth takes place, by which natural tendencies may be strengthened or thwarted, or wholly new ones implanted. Neither of the terms implies any theory ; natural oifts may or may not be hereditary ; nurture does not especially consist of food, clothing, education or tradition, but it includes all these and similar influences whether known or unknown. When nature and nurture compete for supre- macy on equal terms in the sense to be ex- plamed, the former proves the stronger. It is needless to insist that neither is self-sufficient ; 1] , ANTECEDENTS. 13 | _ the highest natural endowments may be starved } by defective nurture, while no carefulness of nurture can overcome the evil tendencies of an intrinsically bad physique, weak brain, or brutal disposition. Differences of nurture stamp un- mistakable marks on the disposition of the soldier, clergyman, or scholar, but are wholly in- sufficient to efface the deeper marks of individual character. ‘The impress of class distinctions is superficial, and may be compared to those which give a general resemblance to a family of daughters at a provincial ball, all dressed alike, and so similar in voice and address as to puzzle a recently-introduced partner in his endeavours to recollect with which of them he is engaged to dance; but an intimate friend forgets their general resemblance in the presence of the far greater dissimilarity which he has learned to appreciate. There are twins of the same sex so alike in body and mind that not even their own mothers can distinguish them. Their features, voice, and expressions are similar; they see things in the same light, and their ideas follow the same laws of association. This close 14 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. __ [cuar. — resemblance necessarily gives way under the © gradually accumulated influences of difference © of nurture, but it often lasts till manhood. I have been told of a case in which two twin brothers, both married, the one a medical man, the other a clergyman, were staying at the same ~ house. One morning, for a joke, they changed their neckties, and each personated the other, sitting by his wife through the whole of the breakfast without discovery. Shakespeare was a | close observer of nature ; it is, therefore, worth recollecting that he recognizes in his thirty-six plays three pairs of family likeness so deceptive as to create absurd confusion. Two of these pairs are in the “ Comedy of Errors,” and the other in “Twelfth Night” (v. 1.) I heard of a case not many years back in which a young English- man had travelled to St. Petersburg, then much less accessible than now, with no letters of introduction, and who lost his pocket-book, and was penniless. He was walking along the quay in some despair at his prospects, when he was startled by the cheery voice of a stranger who accosted him, saying he required no intro- 1.] ANTECEDENTS. ; 15 duction because his family likeness proclaimed him to be the son of an old friend. The English- man did not conceal his difficulties, and the stranger actually lent him the sum he needed on the cuarantee of his family likeness, con- firmed, no doubt, by some conversation. In this and similar instances how small has been the influence of nurture; the child had developed into manhood, along a predestined course laid out in his nature. It would be impossible to find a converse instance in which two persons, unlike at their birth, had been moulded by simi- larity of nurture into so close a resemblance that their nearest relations failed to distinguish them. Let us quote Shakespeare again as an illustra- tion ; in “ A Midsummer-Night’s Dream” (iii. 2), Helena and Hermia, who had been inseparable in childhood and girlhood, and had identical nurture— “So we grew together, Like to a double cherry, seeming parted, But yet a union in partition,”— were physically quite unlike: the one was short and dark, the other tall and fair; therefore, the 16 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE, [cmar, similarity of their nurture did not affect thei : features. The moral likeness was superficial, because a sore trial of temper, which produced a violent quarrel between them, brought out great dissimilarity of character. In the compe- j tition bet ween nature and nurture, when the ; differences in either case do not exceed those which distinguish individuals of the same race living in the same country under no very ex- ; -ceptional conditions, nature certainly proves the 1 stronger of the two. RACE AND BIRTHPLACE. As regards the race of the scientific men on my list, it has already been mentioned that for 3 the purposes of a census enumeration three-— fourths may be considered English, but their precise origin is as follows. Omitting a few — Germans, out of every 10 scientific men, 5 are | pure English; 1 is Anglo-Welsh; 1 is Anglo- © Irish ; 1 is pure Scotch; 1 includes Anglo-Scotch, ~ Scotch-Irish, pure Irish, Welsh, Manx and Channel a Islands ; finally, 1 is “unclassed.” These un- ae .—C Se ANTECEDENTS. 17 classed are of extremely mixed origin. One is in about equal degrees English, Irish, French, and German ; another is English, Scotch-Creole, and Dutch; another English, Dutch, Creole, and Swedish ; and so on. (I trust the reader knows what “‘creoles”” are—namely, the descendants of white families long settled in a tropical colony ; and that he does not confound the term with “mulattoes.”) I give this information: without being able to make much present use of it. It is chiefly intended to serve as a standard with which other natural groups may hereafter be compared, such as groups of artists or of literary men. One would desire to know whether persons in England generally show so great a diver- sity of origin; but it is somewhat difficult to answer the question owing to a want of precision in the word “generally.” If we were to go to rural districts, or small stag- nant towns, we should find much less variety of origin; but I think there would be quite as much in the more energetic classes of the metropolis, who have immigrated from all C 18 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. — [cHaP. quarters. Some haphazard selecting which i tried: confirmed this view, Then comes the 7 important question, Is this a sign that. a mixture of one or more of the various civi- lized races is conducive to form an able off- spring? No doubt the varied “nurture” due to separate streams of tradition has oreat influence in awakening original thought, but ; we are not speaking of this now; the ques-— tion is about “nature.” On an analysis of the scientific status of the men on my list, it appeared to me that their ability is higher in» proportion to their numbers among those of pure race. ‘The Border men and lowland” Scotch come out exceedingly well; the Anglo- Irish and Anglo-Welsh, notwithstanding emi-— nent individual exceptions, would as a whole rank last. Owing to my list not being ex- j haustive, I hardly like to attempt conclusions — as to the precise productiveness of scien-— tific ability of the Scotch, English, and Irish severally, but there cannot be a shadow of doubt that its degrees are in the order I have named. Bil ANTECEDENTS. 19 The birthplaces of scientific men and of their _ parents are usually in towns, away from the sea coast. Out of every 5 birthplaces I find that 1 _ lies in London or its suburbs; 1 in an important ; town, such as Edinburgh, Glasgow, Dublin, Bir- mingham, Liverpool, or Manchester ; 1 is in a small town ; and 2 either in a village or actually in the country. These returns are given with more detail in the foot-note.t The branch of science pursued is often in curious disaccord with the surrounding influence of the birthplace. Mecha- nicians are usually hardy lads born in the country, biologists are frequently pure townsfolk. Partly in consequence of the prevalence of their urban distribution I find that an irregular plot may be marked on the map of England which includes much less than one-half of its area, but more than 92 per cent. of the birthplaces of the English scientific men or of their parents. The accom- panying diagram shows its position; one thin * London, 16 ; suburbs, 5; = 21. Edinburgh and Glasgow, 7; Cork, Belfast, and Dublin, 6; Birmingham, Liverpool, and Manchester, 5; total— 18. Smaller towns, 21; else- where, 40. General total, 100. CeZ 20 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. _. [onar, arm abuts on the sea between Hastings and — Folkestone, and runs northwards over London and Birmingham, where it is joined by another His | l ( | | li if thin arm proceeding from Cornwall and Devon- shire, crossing the Bristol Channel to Swansea, and thence to Worcester. The two arms are 4 ANTECEDENTS. 21 now combined into one of double breadth ; it ~ covers Nottingham, Shrewsbury, Liverpool, and Manchester. Above these latitudes it again nar- rows, and after sending a small branch to Hull, proceeds northwards to Newcastle, Edinburgh, and Glasgow. Thus there are large areas in England and Wales outside this irregular plot which are very deficient in aboriginal science. One comprises the whole of the Eastern Counties, another includes the huge triangle at whose angles Hastings, Worcester, and Lxeter, or rather Exmouth, are situated. OCCUPATION OF PARENTS AND POSITION IN LIFE. My list contaims men who have been born in every social grade, from the highest order in the peerage down to the factory hand and simple peasant, but the returns which I shall discuss do not range quite so widely. These are 96 in number, and may be classified as follows—but the same name appears in two 22 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. (crap. classes on eleven occcasions, so that the total entries are raised to 107» Noblemen and private gentlemen _..... ath Army and navy, 6; civil service, 9 ; dione nate officers, 3 oe . , ELS Law, 11; medical, 9; clergy ai saiNdetans: 6: Sarees 6; architect, 1; secretary to an insurance office, pee a a3 Ope Bankers, 7 ; merchants, 21 ; . aiamnehastareras Lb 43 Farmers ; aS ooh ae ae 2 Others ... ae - a is ea 1 107 The terms used in the third and fourth groups must be understood in a very general sense ; thus, there are some “merchants” on a very small scale indeed, and others on a very large one. | | It is by no means the case that those who have raised themselves by their abilities are found to be abler than their contemporaries who began their careers with advantages of fortune and social position. They are not more distin-— guished as original investigators, neither are they more discerning in those numerous ques- tions, not strictly scientific, which happen to — 51.) ANTECEDENTS. 23 be brought before the councils of scientific societies. There can be no doubt but that the upper classes of a nation like our own, which are largely and continually recruited by selec- tions from below, are by far the most productive of natural ability. The lower classes are, in truth, the “ residuum.” Of the 6 clergymen or ministers who were fathers of scientific men, no less than 4 ap- pear in a second category, viz., (1) clereyman and schoolmaster; (2) physician, afterwards clergyman; (3) Unitarian minister and school- master; (4) professor of classics, afterwards an Independent minister. Among the successful graduates of Oxford and Cambridge, and among purely literary men, we find a much larger proportion of sons of clergymen. There is at Cambridge a well-known university scholarship, called the “ Bell,” which is open only to ‘sons of elereymen of the Church of England. As it has been chiefly given for classical proficiency, we may be almost sure that the senior classic of his year, if he were the son of a clergyman, would also be a Bell scholar. I looked through 24 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHar. the lists, and found that out of 45 senior classics (1824-68 inclusive) 10 had. gained the scholar- ship, whence I conclude that at least 1 out of every 4 or 5 Cambridge graduates is the son of a clergyman. At this rate, out of 100 Cam- 4 bridge graduates, 22 would have had clergy- — men of the Church of England for their fathers, — whereas out of 100 scientific men only 3 or 4 © were sO circumstanced. It is therefore a fact, — that in proportion to the pains bestowed on — their education generally, the sons of clergymen rarely take a lead in science. The pursuit of — science is uncongenial to the priestly character. — It has fallen to my lot to serve for many years on the councils of many scientific societies, and, excepting a very few astronomers and mathe- maticians, about whom I will speak directly, I can only recall 3 colleagues who were clergy- — men; curiously enough, 2 of these, the Revs. — Baden Powell and Dunbar Heath, have been — prosecuted for unorthodoxy; the third was Bishop Wilberforce, who can hardly be said to have loved science ; he rarely attended the meet- ings, but delighted in administration, and sought 2] ANTECEDENTS. 25 openings for indirect influence. The reason for the. abstinence of clergymen from scientific work cannot be that they are too busy, too much home - tied, or cramped in pecuniary means, because other professional men, more busy, more at the call of others, and having less assured revenues, are abundantly represented on all the council lists. Not caring to trust my unaided recollections, I have examined the council lists of ten scientific societies at or near the three periods, 1850, 1860, 1870. There have been changes in some of the societies, and there are many trifling peculiarities of detail, tedious and un- necessary here to deal with, but the following statement is substantially correct. The ordinary members of council are on a rough general average 20 in number to each of the following societies: (1) Royal; (2) British Association ; (3) Astronomical ; (4) Chemical ; (5) Geological ; (6) Linnean ; (7) Zoological; (8) Geographical ; (9 and 10) the two predecessors of the recently- established Anthropological Institute, viz. Eth- nological and Anthropological ; (11) Statistical. 26 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. (cmap, Therefore as we are dealing with 3 distinct periods, 11 societies, and 20 members of council to each, there have been about (3 x 11 x 20 =) 660 separate appointments. Clergymen have held only 16 of these, or 1 in 40; and they have in nearly every case been attached to those subdivisions of science which have fewest salient points to scratch or jar against dogma. ‘Thus Prof. Challis, Dr. Lloyd, Dr. Robinson, Dr. Whewell, Rev. J. Fisher, Rev. W. Webb, Rev. Vernon Harcourt, Prof. Pritchard, Prof. Price, Rev. J. Barlow, and Prof. Willis are all chiefly connected with astronomy, physics, and mathematics; the five — remaining names are those of the Rey. G. C. Renouard, the geographer ; Bishop Wilberforce, — and the Rev. Dunbar Heath, of whom I have already spoken; the Rev. Dr. Nicholson, and — the Rev. Canon Greenwell: there is not a single biologist among them. ANTECEDENTS. 27 PHYSICAL PECULIARITIES OF PARENTS. It has been frequently asserted that certain ‘ physical peculiarities in the parents clash, and < that others combine happily in the offspring. I therefore thought it well to make inquiries as to the figure, complexion, colour of hair, height, and other physical peculiarities of the fathers and mothers of the scientific men. I also -asked about the temperaments, if they were marked, but the answers to these were few. Tables showing the number of cases in which there has been harniony, indifference, or contrast, between various physical peculiarities of the two parents TEMPERAMENTS OF PARENTS. (h = harmony, ¢ = contrast). FATHERS. MOTHERS. Nervous. | Sanguine.| Bilious. |Lymphatic. re h. 6 5 _— c. 0 Sanguine 1 h. 3 an c. 0 Bilious A Ad ee Po 4 — h. 1 —_ Dymphatic .-.-. ... ce. 0 ec. 2 — h. 0 Summary—Harmony, 10 cases ; contrast, 2 ; indifferent, 10. Total, 22. 28 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cr COLOUR OF HAIR OF PARENTS. (h = harmony, ¢ =§eontrast). FATHERS. MOTHERS. Black. | Dark. Feud Brown. — Ligh t. Black h2|h2| hi 1| 0] e1 Dark 02 h2}h 5] hl 2 2|/ ¢1 Dark Brown Oj h2/h4/] hs 8 0 Brown’ s.3.0 4 3 4) bh 21hoi4}) ht 0 Light Brown . |} ¢. 9 2 2/h1|hO/} h.O | Light. : ec. 3] ¢c. 0 0 27 hn, Oh Fair . ce. 01640] ¢ 0 Oo; hil] ho Summary—Harmony, 44 cases; contrast, 6 ; indifferent, 22. Total, 72. C I have, in addition, 11 cases of coloured hair—yellowish, sandy, — red, light auburn, dark auburn, chestnut—but not one case * strict harmony among them. 2 - FIGURE OF PARENTS OF SCIENTIFIC MEN. (h = harmony, c = contrast), FATHERS. MOTHERS. : Corpulent,| Muscular,| Compact, | Spare, stout, or | robust, |symmetrel,| neat, Medium. plump. strong. stately. small. Corpulent, stout, or plump 3 h. 3 h. 5 0 c7 c. 1 Muscular, robust. strong . h. 0 h. 2 1 e.1 0 Compact, symme- trical, stately. 3 2 h. 2 eS 0 Spare, neat, small c. 9 ce. 5 4 hy .32 | Medium ° 0 ‘ § 1 5 h. 0 Summary—Harmony, 24 cases; contrast, 23 ; indifferent, 24. Total, 71. ' oe :) ANTECEDENTS. 29 The foregoing tables show results bearing on the question whether harmony or contrast pre- vails in the physical characteristics of the parents. 1 think they must be accepted as decidedly in favour of harmony. The grand totals which they give are 78 cases of harmony, 31 of contrast, and 56 of indifference. In short, there is more purity of breed in scientific men than would have resulted from haphazard marriages. In the temperaments of their parents, harmony strongly prevails over contrast, the proportion being 5 to 1 in favour of the former. In colour of hair, harmony is twice as frequent as contrast. In figure it is equally common, because “ corpulent, stout, or plump” persons of one sex seem to have a peculiar and reciprocated liking for “spare, neat, or small” persons of the other. This is literally the only case in these tables where a love of contrast equals that of harmony. I came to much the same conclusions by giving appro- priate marks for harmony, contrast, and indif- ference to each quality in each case, thus obtaining aggregate marks for every pair, which I treated on much the same principle that the 30 sx BNGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. (crap. > separate qualities are treated in the table. As regards height, there is a stricter method of in- vestigation, which statisticians will appreciate. It is well known, by repeated experience, that the heights of men and of women in any large group are distributed according to the “law of frequency of error.” In other words, the propor-— tionate number of people of different heights” corresponds to what would have been the case supposing stature to be due to the aggregate action of many small and independent variable : causes. The probability is inconceivably small that all the independent causes should in any given case co-operate to produce an excess of | height; if they did so, the result would be a Brobdignagian giant; or that they should all co-operate to produce a deficiency in height, in — which case the result would be a Lilliputian dwarf. On the other hand, the probability is great that the number and effects of the causes in excess and those in deficiency of their several — average values will be pretty equal. As for these and all other intermediate cases, their relative frequency is determined by the above law, which i ee aR ANTECEDENTS. a 3 is based on that by which the relative frequency Sear different “runs of luck ” is calculated: _ I now proceed to apply this law. I have 62 eases in which the heights of both parents are given numerically, whence it appears that—(1) the average height of the fathers is between 5 ft. 9in. and 5 ft. 94im., and that their distribution conforms closely to the law of frequency of error, the “probable error” of the series being 1°7 in. (2) The average height of the mothers is 5 ft. 42 in., and the distribution of their heights con- forms fairly to the above-mentioned law, the “probable error” of the series being 1:9 in. It follows from the well-known properties of the law in question, that if there had been no sexual selec- tion in respect of height, the sum of the heights of the two parents would also conform to the law of frequency of error, and that the probable error of the series would be V(1°7)?+(1°9)? = 2°5 in. (3) 1 find that the heights in question do con- form pretty closely to the law in question, and that the probable error of the series is 2°3 in., which differs so slightly from the value obtained by calculation, on the supposition of there having 32 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [omar. been no sexual preference for contrast in height, that we may safely affirm inthis case also, that the love of contrast does not prevail over that of harmony.’ i It is a question of high importance to gpecu-* lations on the future of our race, whether the — instincts of sexual selection are or are not re-— pugnant to an improvement in the human breed. We know perfectly well that they are re- pugnant to unions where the resemblance is very close ; thus near intermarriages shock our feel-— ings, and the maintenance of high-bred artificial — varieties in their purity is always effected with difficulty among animals. On the other hand, they are equally repugnant to unions in which there is great contrast ; thus, the intermarriage — of white and black races rarely takes place, and animals of different species refuse to cross. Where, then, and how wide, is the belt that lies ' The series of facts in (1), (2), and (3), and the correspond- ing figures given by the theory with which they are supposed — to conform, are as follows :— (1) FaTuer. (2) Moruzr. = (3) Born PARENTS. Fact . . 315 29 801832 | 5 1482291168 4261351 Theory . 5 15 27 291851 8 18 25 26 15 6 2 1291321 a ANTECEDENTS. 33 between close harmony and wide contrast, in - which sexual instinct acts most powerfully? It appears from the facts in this chapter, that the marriages of parents of the scientific men on my list actually tended to produce differentiation and purity of race. My data concerning the parents of men of other groups are insufficient to enable me yet to give comparative results showing how far the selective sexual instincts of the population generally would thwart, be indifferent to, or co-operate with the influences of future social restrictions on unsuitable mar- riages, or encouragement of suitable ones. PRIMOGENITURE, &XC. The following statement shows, in percentages, the position of the scientific men in respect to age among their brothers and sisters :— Only sons, 22 cases; eldest sons, 26 cases; — youngest sons, 15 cases. Of those who are neither eldest nor youngest, 13 come in the elder half of the family ; 12 in the younger half ; and 11 are exactly in the middle. Total, 99. It further appears that, at the time of the D Ba Be ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. (crap, birth of the scientific men, the ages of their fathers average 36 years,"and those of their mothers 30. The details are shown in the table below :— AGE OF PARENTS AT BIRTH OF SCIENTIFIC MEN. |} No. of Total | Cases. = ie Cases. | nder ) and | if 99 | 20- | 25- | 80- | 35- | 40- | 45= |i ove Fathers 0 1 16.|-84:) 92.) a7 7 4 100 Mothers 2 20 26 | 34 | 12 5 1 — .| 100% Putting these facts together, viz.—(1) that elder sons appear nearly twice as often as younge sons ; (2) that, as regards intermediate children, the elder and younger halves of the family contri bute equally ; and (3) that only sons are as comme n as eldest sons, we must conclude that the age of the parents, within the limits with which we chiefly have to deal, has little influence on the nature of the child ; secondly, that the elder sons have, on the whole, decided advantages of nur ture over the younger sons. They are mo e likely to become possessed of independent means, and therefore able to follow the pursuits that have most attraction to their tastes; they e x:] ANTECEDENTS. 35 treated more as companions by their parents, and have earlier responsibility, both of which would ‘develop independence of character; probably, also, the first-born child of families not well-to-do in the world would generally have more atten- tion in his infancy, more breathing ‘space, and better nourishment, than his younger brothers and sisters in their several turns. The opposing disadvantage of primogeniture, in producing less healthy children and half as many idiots again as the average of the rest of the family, has not been sensibly felt, partly because the latter risk is very small, and partly because the mothers of the scientific men are somewhat less youthful than those from whom the above statistical results were calculated. (See Duncan “On F ertility,” &c., second edition, pp. 293, 4, for tabulations of Dr. A. Mitchell’s results.) An unusual number of the mothers of the scientific men were between 30—34 at the time of their birth; this is a very suitable age, according to the views of Aristotle, but undoubtedly older than what Dr. Duncan’s statistics (pp. 387, 390) recommend. According to these, the most favour- D 2 a ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. (cma able period for the survival of mother and child and therefore probably the best in every sense, | [ when she is 20—25 at the time of giving bi th ~The important question of the effect of the age o the parent on the wellbeing of the offspring see 0 never yet to have been treated as strictly and ai copiously as it deserves. Dr. Duncan, in th chapter of his work above referred to, has ¢ is: cussed the materials at his disposal with gie 1 ingenuity and industry ; but adequate statistics sorted according to the various classes of society are still wanting. FERTILITY. The families are usually large to which scien tific men belong. I have two sets of returns—the one of brothers and sisters, excluding, for th most part, those who died in infancy ; and th other of brothers and sisters who attained 30 years | In these several cases I have included the scien: tific man himself, and find, on an average 0 about 100 cases, that the total number of brother and sisters is 6°30 in the first case, and 4°80 i Fi.) ANTECEDENTS. 37 the second. It is a matter of great interest to compare with these figures the number of the children of the scientific men themselves. It is easy to do so with fairness, because the time of marriage proves to be nearly the same in both cases; if anything, the scientific men marry i eee earlier than their parents. It remains to eliminate all cases of absolutely sterile marriages on the part of the scientific men, and those in which there might yet be other children born. Having attended to these precautions, I find the number of their living children (say, of ages between 5 and 30) to be 4°7. This implies a diminution of fertility as compared with that of their own parents, and confirms the common belief in the tendency to an extinction of the families of men who work hard with the brain. On the other hand, I shall show that the health and energy of the scientific men are remarkably high ; it therefore seems strange that there should be a falling off in their offspring. 1 have tried in many ways to find characteristics common to those scientific men whose families were the smallest, but have only lighted upon one general result, which I give provisionally, 38 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. (cHar namely, that a relative deficiency of health an energy, in respect to that of their own parents, is very common among them, Their absolute heal h and energy may be high, far exceeding those of people generally ; but I speak of a noticeable - falling off from the yet more robust’ condition of the previous generation : it is this which appears to be dangerous to the continuance of the race. My figures give the remarkable result that there are no children at all in one out of every three of these cases. I think that ordinary observation corroborates this conclusion, and that those of my readers who happen to have mixed much in what is called intellectual society will be able to recall numerous instances of persons of both sexes, but especially of women, possessed of high gifts of every kind, including health and energy, but of less solid vigour than their parents, and who have no children. I do not overlook the fact that the ‘scientific men are an urban population, bei 1g mindful of results I have published elsewhe . (Statistical Journal, 1873), which show a simila: diminution in the average fertility of townsmel as compared with country folk ; but this would ey) ANTECEDENTS. 39 not account for their being less prolific than their parents who were also townsmen, nor for the large number of wholly sterile marriages. HEREDITY. The effects of education and circumstances are so interwoven with those of natural character in determining a man’s position among his contem- poraries, that I find it impossible to treat them wholly apart. Still less is it possible completely to separate the evidences relating to that por- tion of a man’s nature which is due to here- dity, from all the rest. Heredity and many _ other co-operating causes must therefore be con- sidered in connection ; but I feel sure that as the reader proceeds, and becomes familiar with the variety of the evidence, he will insensibly effect for himself much of the required separation. Also, from time to time, as opportunity may offer, I shall attempt to draw distinctions. ‘The study of hereditary form and features in combination with character promises to be of much interest, but it proves disappointing on 40 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE, [eu ‘ . trial, owing to the impossibility of obtaining g 006 historical portraits. The value of these is further diminished by the passion of distinguished indi- viduals to be portrayed in uniforms, wigs, robes, or whatever voluminous drapery seems most appropriate to their high office, forgetting that all this conceals the man. The practice might t well become common of photographing the features from different points of view, and at different periods of life, in such a way as would be most advantageous to a careful ‘study of the lineaments of the man and his family. “ interest that would attach to collections of thes in after-times might be extremely great. PEDIGREES. Thirteen families have been selected, out of those to which about 120 of the scientific men on my list belong, as appearing noteworthy for thei . richness in ability during two, three, or more generations, or for any other peculiarity ; in 60 me cases they are also remarkable for purity of t De, The facts may for the most part be verified by re- e 1] ANTECEDENTS. . 41 ference to the publications of which the titles are given ; and the whole could have been obtained by any one who cared to search other more or less public sources of information. Five of these families (Bentham, Darwin, Dawson-Turner, Ros- coe, and Taylor of Ongar) have already been alluded to in my previous work (‘‘ Hereditary Genius ”), whence I have extracted what appeared to the point, adding what was necessary. In estimating the number of individuals in each generation, the practice has been usually adopted of not counting those who died young, or have not yet attained their 30th year. Auperson.—Many members of this family have been intellectually gifted. There has been an unusual number of cases of mathematical achievement among them. First generation—5 males and 2 females, chil- | dren of the Rey. J. Alderson and his wife (the latter lived to 94). Of these, 3 males deserve notice :—(1) James Alderson, M.D., of Norwich ; (2) Robert Alderson, Recorder of Norwich, Ips- wich, and Yarmouth : (3) John Alderson, founder 42 _ ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. __ [ouar, and president of all the literary and scientific institutions of the time in ‘Kingston-upon-Hull All these were men of considerable local repute. — Second generation.—15 males and 12 females, of whom 5 males and 1 female deserve especial mention: —(1) Sir Edward Hall Alderson, Baron of the Exchequer, who was the first man of his year at Cambridge, both in mathematics and classics, being senior wrangler and senior classical : medallist, a- distinction barely equalled in them long annals of university achievement > (2a Robert Woodhouse, also a senior wrangler, Luca-_ sian and Plumian Professor of Astronomy at Cambridge; (3) the Rev. Samuel H. Alderson, third wrangler, and tutor of Caius College ; (4) : | Sir James Alderson, M.D., F.R.S. (sixth wrangler), — | for four years President of the Royal College of Physicians ; (5) Colonel Ralph Alderson, R.E., a distinguished officer, and one of the first govern- ment commissioners of railways; (1) Mrs. Amelia Opie, the novelist. , Third generation.—I have not sufficient infor- , | mation, although I know that it includes many persons of ability, among whom is Major H. . | tJ ANTECEDENTS. 43 Alderson, R.A., a distinguished officer; also a married lady of high artistic powers. BentHam.—A family consisting of only 3 male — representatives, all eminent, and one illustrious. First generation—2 brothers:—(1) Jeremy Bentham, jurist of the highest rank (life by Sir J. Bowring, prefixed to the collected works edited by him) ; (2) General Sir Samuel Bentham, whose early manhood was spent in the Russian service ; distinguished for his numerous administrative re- forms and singular inventive power. Afterwards inspector-general of naval works in England (life by his widow, 1862). : Second generation.—1 male only :—George Bentham, F.R.S., systematic botanist of the highest rank ; in early life, writer on logic ; for many years President of the Linnzan Society. CARPENTER.—Among the characteristics of this family are literary and scientific enterprise, _ philanthropic effort, mapecmaoreaity, and aptitude for oral exposition, First generation.—Rey. Lant Carpenter, LL.D., 44 _ ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cu a Unitarian minister; descended from a non-sub- scribing Presbyterian family, and married to a wife of similar descent ; a leading member of - ne. Liberal party in Exeter and Bristol ; extremel a active in the promotion of philanthropic objects ; both literary and scientific in his studies, and 7 -man of local celebrity (memoirs by his son, 1842). | | a Second generation. —2 males and 3 females, — of whom both the males and 1 female require notice :—(1) William B, Carpenter, ERS, Re- gistrar of the London University, © physio- | logist, and frequent writer and speaker on scientific subjects, in many cases connected with — social amelioration ; (2) Dr. P. P. Carpenter (of 7 Montreal), conchologist ; actively engaged in phil-_ anthropic work ; (7) Mary Carpenter, actively 4 engaged in the foundation and organization of ’ philanthropic institutions, especially juvenile re- — formatories, and promoter of female education 4 in India. 4 Third generation (too young for special notice) 4 includes an influential dissenting minister and a very successful student. 1] ANTECEDENTS. . 45 Darwin.—There are many instances in this family of a love for natural history and theory, and of an aptitude for collecting facts in business- like but peculiar ways. Speaking from private sources of knowledge, | am sure that these cha- racteristics are hereditary rather than traditional : there is also a strong element of individuality in the race which is adverse to traditional influence. - First generation.—(1) Erasmus Darwin, M.D., F.RS., physician, physiologist and poet. His “ Botanic Garden” had an immense reputation at the time it was written; for, besides its intrinsic merits, it chimed in with the sentiments and mode of expression of his day. The ingenuity of Dr. Darwin’s numerous writings and theories is truly remarkable. He was held in very hich esteem by his scientific friends, including such cele- brities as Priestley and James Watt, and it is by a man’s position among his contemporaries and competitors that his worth may most justly be appraised. Unfortunately for his memory, he has had no good biographer. He was a man of great vigour, humour and geniality (Miss Seward’s life of him, and latterly a pamphlet by Dr. Richardson ; 46 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cua sce also Meteyard’s “ Life of Wedgewood 5 ee (2 his brother, Robert Waring Darwin, wrote “ Prin. cipia Botanica,” which reached its third edition in 1810. It is said (Meteyard’s “ Life of Wedge- wood ”) that the Darwins “ sprang from a letter od and intellectual race, as his (Dr. Darwin’s) fath or was one among the earliest members of the Spalding Club.” a Second generation.—7 males, 8 females, of whom 3 males deserve notice -—(1) Charles Dar- win, who died at the age of only 21, poisoned by. | a dissection wound, but who had already achieved | such distinction that his name has been fre- quently mentioned in biographical dictionaries. His thesis, on obtaining the gold medal of the | Edinburgh University, was on the distinction be-— tween ‘‘ pus” and “ mucus.” It was a real step for- ; ward in those early days of exact medical science, 4 and was thought highly of at the time; (2) Robert Waring Darwin, M.D., F.R.S., a physician, | and shrewd observer, of great provincial celebrity, on many grounds, who lived at Shrewsbury. He - married a daughter of Wedgewood’s, and was father of Charles Darwin (see below); (3) Sir ‘— 1] ANTECEDENTS. 47 Francis Darwin, originally a physician, but for many years living in a then secluded part of Derbyshire, surrounded by animal oddities ; half- wild pigs ran about the woods, tamed snakes frequented the house, and the like. Third generation.—8 males, 14 females, of whom 3 males may be mentioned ; but illustriously among them—(1) Charles Darwin, F.R.S., “the Aristotle of our days,’ whom all scientific men reverence and love; the simple grandeur of whose conclusions is as remarkable as the magnitude and multifariousness of their foundation. There is much ability in many individuals in this gene- ration who bear the name of Darwin, and it has been strongly directed to natural history in the case of (2) a son of Sir Francis Darwin, a fre- quent writer, under a well-known nom de plume, on sporting matters. Among. those who do not bear that name (being children of the daughters of Dr. Erasmus Darwin), I mention (3) myself,’ 1 Captain Douglas Galton, F.R.S., distinguished for official activity in many high posts, and now Director of Public Works, is descended maternally, not from the Darwin, but from the Strutt family, which has produced noted mechanicians, 48 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. with all humility, as falling technically withi the limits of the group Sf scientific men w der discussion, on the ground of former gec graphical work, and having had much to do i the administration of various scientific societies, Fourth generation.— Includes very few indi viduals who have reached mature manho od among these are (1) George Darwin, sece ‘ wrangler at Cambridge, author of an imports an article on “ Restrictions to Liberty of Maningll : (2) Captain Leonard Darwin, R.A., who wai second in the competition of his year for Wool wich, and now engaged on the Transit of Ven 1 Expedition; (3) Henry Parker, fellow of Universi , College, Oxford, classical scholar and chemist. 4 Dawson-TURNER.—This family is characterisec by great intellectual activity and much artis it taste. First generation.—Dawson Turner, E.R. botanist, scholar, antiquary; a man of unwea ried activity in collecting and compiling, an¢ an encourager of work in others. One of his tw uncles was the Rey. Joseph Turner, senior wrangle ANTECEDENTS. 49 in 1768, and much distinguished by the personal | friendship of Mr. Pitt. Among his 10 male first cousins on the paternal side were the late Lord Justice Turner and his accomplished brothers. Second generation.—2 males and 6 females. ; The latter were all remarkable for their energy, | accomplishments, and the large share they took _ in the literary labour of their father and hus- bands, which was not confined to transcribing. Three were accomplished artists, one a musician, another well versed in Greek, | Third generation.—Of those above the age of 1 30 there are 5 males and 3 females, of whom 4 : | males deserve mention :—(1) Dr. Joseph Hooker, president of the Royal Society, very eminent | botanist, director of Kew Gardens, and formerly | Thibetan traveller, and naturalist to an antarctic _ expedition ; his father was Sir William Hooker, | F.R.S., also one of the first botanists of his day, : and director of Kew Gardens; (2) Francis Pal- grave, editor of the ‘ Golden Treasury,” scholar ‘and art critic ; (3) Gifford Palgrave, orientalist, Arabian explorer, and author of one of the most remarkable works of travel ever written ; (4) R. H. E a “a 50 _ ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. (cr Inglis Palgrave, statistician. (The father of | three last was Sir Francis*Palgrave, historian.) ; Harcourt.—Scholastie success, with mu love for science. a j= ae -¢ First generation.—The Rev. Vernon court, archbishop of York; a man of polish intellect and social gifts. a Second generation.—10 males and 3 fem ale of whom 4 males deserve notice :—(1) The Re W. Vernon Harcourt, F.R.S., chemist, the il president and one of the founders of ¢ British Association at a time when science w partly ridiculed and partly. denounced. i was the chief framer of its elaborate constitu ‘io which is, I believe, a solitary instance of the i vention of a complex administrative machi ne which worked perfectly from the first, and ‘ continued working, almost unchanged, for near half a century. It has served as a model uf which many other societies have organi themselves. (2) Egerton; and (3) Edw Vernon Harcourt, both double-firsts at Oxf 01 and (4) Granville Vernon Harcourt, who di 1] ANTECEDENTS. b1 when an undergraduate at Oxford, having gained the Latin university prize. Third generation.—-10 males and 13 females, of whom 2 males deserve mention:—(1) Sir William Vernon Harcourt, M.P., lately solicitor- general, professor of international law at Cam- bridge, well known as a political writer under the name “ Historicus” ; (2) Augustus G. Vernon Harcourt, F.R.S., a distinguished chemist, Lee’s reader in chemistry at Oxford. | : Hitt.—The characteristics of this family are, active interest in social improvement, | power of organization, mechanical aptitude, and | general sterling worth. Its type in the second | generation seems to have been unusually pure. _ First generation.—Thomas Wright Hill, de- | scended from stanch Independents, and married to a wife of equal vigour and fortitude, who came from a family noted for mechanical apti- | tude, which she transmitted to her descendants. He rose by his own exertions, and (zt. 40) estab- ‘lished a school, much spoken of at the time, on /an entirely new principle of management at Hazel- E 2 52 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [car wood, near Birmingham. The boys were taken into administrative co-operation ; they regulate their own discipline, and the things they learnt were of the most varied kind. Some men of high note were educated there, and, among these at least one of the scientific men on my list. He ~ gave much attention to mental calculation, and — even on his deathbed (et. 88) invented and successfully applied a new method for determin- | ing for any year the date of Laster. Also” known for his analysis of articulate sounds and phonography. (Short biographical notice in- Annual Report R. Astronomical Society, Feb. 13, - 1852.) Second generation consisted of 5 males and 2 females—All 5 males had strong points of resemblance and deserve notice. (1) Sir Row-— land Hill, K.C.B. and F.R.S., originator and_ organizer of the system of penny postage, which is an influence of the first order of magnitude in modern civilization. He was noted in youth for powers of mental calculation, and in some points was superior even to Zerah Colburn and George Bidder ; thus he could mentally extract 4 ; ‘ 1) ANTECEDENTS. 53 to the nearest integer the cube root of any number not exceeding two thousand millions. First inventor (1835) of rotatory printing, the method which, with slight changes of detail, is still in use for newspapers. Rewarded by three separate grants, viz., in 1846 by a public testimonial of the value of 13,360/., in 1864 by the award from the Treasury of his full salary of 2,000/. a year on his retirement, and in the same year by a parliamentary grant of 20,0007. (2) Matthew Davenport Hill, Q.C., late recorder of Birmingham ; law reformer of note, especially in reference to dealings with the criminal class, substituting promptitude, certainty and strictness for delay, uncertainty and severity (see Law Magazine, July 1872); (8) Edwin Hill, superintendent of the stamp department; first inventor of the envelope folding-machine, since improved by Mr. De la Rue. He completely remodelled the stamping machinery at Somerset House; was most highly commended for these improvements in each of the first three reports of the commissioners of Inland Revenue, and again by a minute on 54 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [CHAP. his retirement, referring to his “eminent and_ exceptional service.” He, Tike his brother, was a standard writer on dealings with criminals ; also on currency. (4) Arthur, head-master of © Bruce Castle school, where he fully developed — the principles first laid down by his father ; (5) Frederick Hill, formerly inspector of prisons, then assistant-secretary of the Post-office. A great and thorough reformer of the prisons un- der his observation, aiming to fit prisoners for honest life on their release. Concurrently, he contributed numerous memoirs on social improve- ments generally. _ Third generation.—14 males and 17 females, among many of whom the family characteristics — continue well marked. Thus (1) Dr. Berkeley Hill, and (2) Miss Emily Clark of Adelaide, Australia, are both actively engaged in work connected with pauper children. Latrope.—A family characterzied by its re- ligious bent and musical and literary tastes, joied to a love of enterprise. First generation.—Benjamin Latrobe, a con-— £ 1.] ANTECEDENTS. 55 vert to the Moravians, of which estimable sect he was a patriarch and a mainstay (Aikin’s “ History of Manchester ”). Second generation.—3 males, 0 females; 2 at least of whom deserve notice :—(1) Christian Ignatius Latrobe, author of the well known col- lection of sacred music; (2) Benjamin Latrobe, architect and engineer in America. Third generation.—7 males, 2 females, of whom 2 deserve especial notice :—(1) Charles Joseph Latrobe, governor of Victoria at the time of the gold discoveries; author of a once extremely popular book on Switzerland, called the “ Alpenstock,’ which was the precursor of Murray’s handbooks and more generally diffused knowledge. Many others of this generation, who bear the Latrobe name, are gifted with the family - characteristics. (2) John Frederick Bateman, ‘F.RS., distinguished engineer. Fourth generation—(still young)—includes Colonel Osman Latrobe, who was chief of General Lee’s staff in America at an early age. Puayrair.—Among the characteristics of this 56 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHAP, family is an interest in various branches of science joined to a capacity for official work and public action. First generation.—Rev. Dr. Playfair, nrinelail ; of the university of St. Andrews, author of a work on geography. Second generation.—4 males and 3 females, © of whom 3 males deserve notice :—(1) George Playfair, M.D., chief inspector-general of hospi- — tals in Bengal; he was the head of his pro- fession in India, and author of various medical memoirs; (2) Colonel Sir Hugh Lyon Playfair, who on his retirement from service pursued life of incessant activity in public improvement (numerous biographical notices were written of him soon after his death); (3) Colonel William Playfair, whose memory still lives in India as one of the most accomplished ama- teur actors. There were two cousins in this generation, the one a very distinguished man, Professor Playfair, the celebrated mathematician, and author of the ‘‘ Huttonian Theory,” the other was Mr. Playfair, an architect of much eminence, a 1.] ANTECEDENTS. 57 to whom many of the principal public buildings in Edinburgh are due. Third generation.—21 males and 20 females, of whom 2 males deserve especial notice :—(1) The Right Hon. Lyon Playfair, M.P., F.R.S., formerly professor of chemistry, long engaged in scientific administration of various kinds, and postmaster-general at the close of the late administration ; (2) Colonel R. L. Playfair, R.A., the well-known consul-general of Algiers, and naturalist. A third brother is a professor at Kino’s College. Roscozr.—The type of this family is strongly marked; it has been characterized by much cul- tivation, refinement, and poetical taste. First generation.—William Roscoe, author of “Lorenzo di Medici,” “ Leo X.” &. The above mentioned characteristics were strongly marked in him. (Life by his son, Memoirs by Hartley Coleridge in “Northern Worthies,” and “Sketches” by Washington Irving.) Second generation.—7 males and 3 females, of whom 4 males and 2 females deserve notice :— 58 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [omar, (1) Thomas Roscoe, editor | of Lanzi’s ‘ History | of Painting,” and author of many other works; (2) Henry Roscoe, author of a standard book on the “Law of Evidence,” of “British Lawyers,” and of the Life of his father; (3) and (4), both decidedly gifted, and authors of poems of merit; (1) Jane Elizabeth Roscoe, a woman of superior mind, intensely in- terested in public affairs, writer of some poems; (2) Mary Anne Roscoe, authoress of poems of merit. Third generation.—17 males, 16 females, of whom 3 males and 1 female deserve notice :— (1) William Caldwell Roscoe, poet and. critic (memoirs and collected works by R. H. Hutton) ; (2) Henry Enfield Roscoe, F.R.8., professor, eminent chemist; (3) William Stanley Jevons, F.R.S., professor, author of the “Coal Question,” and of various works on logic and_ political economy : (1) Margaret Roscoe, afterwards Mrs. Sandbach, novelist. 3 STRACHEY.—An old family, small in num- bers, but of a marked and persistent type. 1] ANTECEDENTS. 59 Among its characteristics are an active interest in public matters, and an administrative aptitude. There have been men of eminence in genera- tions previous to those mentioned below. First generation.—Sir Henry Strachey, under- secretary of state, and otherwise employed in high official posts in India, America, and England ; real negotiator of Peace of Versailles (Stanhope’s “History of England”); received medal of Society of Arts for having introduced indigo into Florida. | Second generation.—3 males, 1 female, of whom 2 males deserve notice :—(1) Sir Henry Strachey, Indian judge, called by James Mill, in his “History of India,” “the wisest of the Company’s servants ;” aided much in the organi- zation of the Indian judicial administration ; (2) Edward Strachey, author of reports of acknowledged weight on Indian judicial subjects (Vth Report). Third generation.—6 males and 1 female, of whom 3 males deserve notice -—(1) Sir John Strachey, eminent in all branches of civil 60 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. _[cuar. administration in India; (2) Henry Strachey, Thibetan explorer, gold medallist of the Royal Geographical Society; (8) Major-General — Richard Strachey, R.E., F.R.S., active adminis- trator of Indian engineering work; physical geographer. TAYLoRs or OncAR.—Numerous members of this family have shown a curious combination of restless literary talent, artistic taste, evangelical disposition, and mechanical aptitudes. There is an interesting work published upon it, called “The Family Pen,” by the Rev. Isaac Taylor, 1867 (see below in the “fourth generation”), which contains a list of 90 publications by 10 different members of the family, up to that time ; and there have been more publications, and at least one new writer, since. First generation—lIsaac Taylor came to London with an artist’s ambition, and ended by being a reputable engraver. He acted for many years as secretary to the Incorporated Society of Artists of Great Britain, which was the forerunner of the Royal Academy. All the 1] ANTECEDENTS. 61 family characteristics were strongly marked in him. | Second generation consisted of 3 males, all of whom deserve notice :—(1) Charles Taylor, a learned recluse, editor of Calmet’s Bible; (2) Rev. Isaac Taylor, author of “ Scenes in Europe,” &c., educated as an engraver, and far surpassing his father in ability. He married Ann Martyn, a woman of reputed genius, authoress of the “Family Mansion,’ and the numerous able members of the Taylor family for the two next generations sprung, with one exception, from this fortunate union; (3) Josiah Taylor, eminent publisher of architectural works; he made a large fortune. Third generation. — Descendants of Isaac Taylor and Ann Martyn, 3° males and 3 females, of whom 2 males and 2 females deserve notice :—(1) Isaac Taylor, author of “ Natural History of Enthusiasm;” (2) Jeffreys Taylor, author of “ Ralph Richards,” “ Young Islanders,” &e.; (7) and (2), Ann and Jane Taylor, joint authors of “ Original Poems” (Ann married the Rey. Joseph Gilbert). In this same generation 62 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. : [cHA . is ranked the Rev. Howard Hinton, a leading Baptist’ minister, who was % son of one of t 16 sisters in the previous generation, and is father of a well-known aurist. : - — Fourth generation.—6 males and 9 female 4 now living, and some few others who are de | ceased ; of these, 5 males and 1 female deserve special notice :—(1) Rev. Isaac Taylor, author of “Words and Places,” of “The Family Pen,” and of “Etruscan Researches;” (2) Josiah Gilbert, author of “The Dolomite Mountains ;” (3) Joseph Gilbert, F.R.S., eminent for his chemical and physiological researches ‘in their relation to ‘ong culture (the paternal race of Gilbert had also’ a marked type); (4) Thomas Martyn Ferber q Independent minister, scholar, and writer ; (5). Edward Gilbert Herbert, of the Chancery bar, who died young of diphtheria; (1) Helen le authoress of “Sabbath Bells.” WepcEwoop.—This family is curious for th 2 sporadic character of its ability, as shown by the number of its members in rather distant relationships who have become distinguished. 1] ANTECEDENTS. 63 The Wedgewoods must originally have been of a pure type, because the name was prevalent in the village where the great potter was born, and the bearers of it were largely inter-related, and followed the same craft. He himself married a Wedgewood, who was a third cousin, and both his father and grandfather were potters. (Mete- yard’s “ Life.”) 3 First generation.—Josiah Wedgewood, F.R.S., “Father of British Pottery,” whose once abund- ant works now fetch fabulous prices. Second generation.—8 sous and 4 daughters ; 1 son deserves notice, viz.: Thomas Wedgewood, who died young. His abilities were great; he was an ardent experimentalist, and has some claim to rank as the first person who ever made a photograph. (See p. 7.) Third generation, including descendants from the sisters of Josiah Wedgewood, contains :—(1) Hensleigh Wedgewood (English Dictionary and “Origin of Language”); (2) Charles Darwin, F.R.S. (see under Darwin); (3) Sir Henry Hol- | land, Bart., M.D., F.R.S., who died subsequently to my having begun this inquiry; (4) 8.. H. [ouar Parkes, M.D., F-.R.S., professor of hygiGne ti the Army Medical School. 2 Fourth generation.—(See Gade Darwin.) — 64 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. STATISTICAL RESULTS, Let us now look at the near relations of che scientific men from a purely statistical poi it of view, combining those already quoted wi h the rest, and calculate the proportion of them who have achieved distinction. It appears fre m my returns, which are rather troublesome to deal with, owing to incompleteness of informa tion, that 120 scientific men have certainly not more than 250 brothers, 460 uncles, and 1,2 00 male cousins who reach adult life. They ha ve somewhat Jess than 120 fathers and 240 grand: fathers, because the list contains brothers nd cousins. I will take two groups :—(1) gran¢ fathers and uncles, both paternal and mater nal say about 660 persons; (2) brothers and m il cousins on both sides, 1,450 persons. On he supposition, which is somewhat in excess of the fact, that I am dealing with complete info na os ANTECEDENTS. 65 tion concerning the families of 120 scientific men :— I find in the first group-of 660 persons :— (1) Jeremy Bentham, a great leader of thought and founder of a school of philosophy; (2) Wedge- wood, the founder of a national industry and art; (3) Compton, the inventor of a machine for cotton manufacture, which gave a timely impetus to that great national industry; (4) Maskelyne, an astronomer-royal ; (5) Playfair, the scientific head of a Scotch university ; (6) William Smith, founder of British geology; (7) Harcourt, the lawgiver and first president of the British As- sociation ; (8) Pemberton Milnes, who refused both a secretaryship of state and a peerage ; (9) Latrobe, who was to the very worthy sect of the Moravians much what Barclay was to the Quakers, that is to say, not its founder, but a great support to it; (10 and 11) two archbishops, Harcourt of York and Brodrick of Cashel ; (12) Erasmus Darwin, poet and philosopher of high repute in his day; (13) Isaac Taylor, author of “ Natural History of Enthusiasm,” &e, 1. will stop here, though it would be F 66 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [car easy to extend the list considerably, if I took a slightly lower level of celebrity for my ? limit. Every one of these 13 men when he died, — was, or would have been, if he had not pre- viously outlived his reputation, the subject of numerous obituary notices, and his death an — event of sufficient public interest to warrant his being reckoned as an “eminent man.” I formerly calculated, and have since seen no reason to doubt my conclusions, that the annual obituary of the United Kingdom does not include more than 50 men who are eminent in that sense. Therefore this small band of 660 individuals, contains almost one-fourth as much eminence as is annually produced by the United Kingdom. A different criterion of ‘eminence may be found in the number of celebrated men reared in the universities, whither a large proportion of the brightest youths of the nation find their way. I examined the list of honours at Cambridge in the ten years 1820-9 inclusive, and also the four years 1842-5, of which I happen to have some personal knowledge, whence it appeared P 1.] ANTECEDENTS. 67 to me that on the average, 660 Cambridge students do not produce more than 3 men whose general eminence is of equal rank to that of the 13 men in the 660 grandfathers and uncles under consideration. A more exact test, and the best of which I can think, is to examine into the fate of the boys at large schools. It is not difficult to learn the productiveness of each school as regards eminence, because there are annual gatherings, to which former school- boys who have won distinction are generally invited and not unfrequently come. As men begin to distinguish themselves at 35, and may be supposed willing to attend on such occasions till 70, the notabilities invited to be present at school gatherings represent the product of, say, 35 years. I feel sure that 660 middle-class boys do not turn out more than a fraction of one eminent man, though they may turn out many who do well in life and earn fortunes and local repute. The second of the groups consists .as already mentioned, of brothers and male cousins, making a total of about 1,450 men. I will examine F 2 Fe 68 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. _[onar. the achievements of these,,solely -in respect to high university success, partly because seve al of the cousins are too young to have had ti me fully to distinguish themselves otherwise. — us limit ourselves to the following names (the list would be lengthened if we took a lower level) :—Cambridge : (1) Alderson, both first classic and senior wrangler, that is, first. ma- thematician of his year at Cambridge; (2) Woodhouse, senior wrangler; (3) Main, senior wrangler; (4) Humphrey, senior classic; (5) Scott, joint senior classic. Oxford: here ne method of examination affords no means — of ascertaining who is absolutely the first of his year, since the men are grouped alphabetically in classes, and not according to their order o: ; merit in those classes, The names I will select are those of men who were in the first class and r have subsequently distinguished themselves, viz.: (6) Moberly, head master of | Winchester, now Bishop of Salisbury ; (7) Francis Palgrave, critic ; (8) Hon. George Brodrick, first class both F 1 classics and history, well known as an influen ial though anonymous writer. It is a remarkable " . y i” 3 i ANTECEDENTS. 69 fact or coincidence, that 5 men out of a group of 1,450, or say 1 out of every 300, should be first of his year in the single university of Cambridge, either in mathematics or in classics. This is about the proportion that exists among the men who actually go to Cambridge, and these, as before mentioned, are no chance selec- tions, but include a large part of the annual pick of the intellectual flower of the whole nation. Moreover, these distinguished brothers and cousins of scientific mea are themselves inter-related ; the two senior wranglers, Alderson and Woodhouse, being first cousins, and the two classics, Scott and Brodrick, being first cousins also ; both families being, in other respects, rich in ability. We may otherwise appreciate the influence of heredity, as distinguished from that of tradi- tion and education, by observing the similarity of disposition that sometimes prevails among numerous scattered branches of the same family. The two following extracts from the replies I have received, are illustrations of what I mean :— 70 | ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHAP. (1) “My numerous relatiyes, though unknown ~ to fame, are mostly characterised by great breadth of thought and rare independence of action.” [These characteristics seem clearly traced by the writer to a great grandparent who immigrated from Germany]; (2) ‘‘ Counting third cousins, I have scores and scores of relatives, and scarcely an wnsteady person among them.” I have numerous returns, in which the writer analyzes his own nature, and confidently ascribes different parts of it to different ancestors. One correspondent has ingeniously written out his natural characteristics in red, blue, and black inks, according to their origin—a method by which its anatomy is displayed at a glance. My data afford an approximate estimate of the ratio, according to which effective ability (hereditary gifts plus education plus opportunity) is distributed throughout the different degrees of kinship. They state—(1) the number of kinsmen in the several near degrees; (2) the number of those among them who were in any 1.] ANTECEDENTS. 71 sense public men; and (3) the number of those who, not being publicly known, had _never- theless considerable reputation among their friends. It is therefore only requisite (after some previous revision) to add the returns together, and to compare the number of dis- tinguished kinsmen in the various degrees with the total number of kinsmen in those degrees, to obtain results whose ratio to one another is the one we are in search of. These conclusions are not materially vitiated by the fact that different correspondents may have different esti- mates of what constitutes distinction, so long as each writer is consistent to his own scale. I have tried the figures in many ways—without any revision at all, with moderate revision, and with careful sifting, and I find the proportions to come out much the same in every case. In comparing these with previous results, obtained from an analysis of men of much higher general eminence (‘Hereditary Genius,” p. 317), :4 find the falling off in ability from the central figure, the hero of the family, to be less rapid as the distance of the kinship increases. There 72 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHaP is however one group in that book, consisting of divines, whose general eminence is not so great as the rest, and which also resembles the scientific men in the family distribution of ability. My former figures for 100 divines gave 22 notable fathers, 42 brothers, 28 grand- fathers, and 42 uncles; my present results for 100 scientific men are 28, 36, 20, and 40 respectively. As regards the relative influence of the paternal and maternal lines, I find close equality. My method of comparison is by setting off paternal grandfathers and paternal uncles against maternal grandfathers and maternal uncles, no other near degree of kinship being available for the purpose. My results for 100 scientific men are :—paternal grandfathers, public characters, 10; of high private reputation, 3; paternal uncles, 13 and 8 ; _ making a total on the paternal side of 34. On the other hand, the maternal grandfathers are 11 and 4; maternal uncles, 15 and 7; making a total on the maternal side of 37.1 ‘In “Hereditary Genius,’ p. 196, having fewer cases of scientific men to deal with, I extended my inquiries to ANTECEDENTS. 73 I leave to another chapter some remarks about the relative value of maternal and paternal edu- cational influences on scientific men. ; nephews and grandsons, and in a second table even to great- grandparents, great-grandsons, and other equally remote de- _ grees, but this latter was cunfessedly of little value. CHAPTER IL. QUALITIES. Energy—Size of’ Head—Health—Perseverance — Practical Business Habits—Memory—Independence of Character -—Mechanical Aptitude— Religious Bias—Truthfulness. In this chapter I will speak of the qualities which the returns specify as most conspicuous in scientific men, and I shall endeavour to make them tell their own tale by quoting anonymous extracts from their communications. Some of these qualities are common to all men who suc- ceed in life, others—such as the love for science— are more or less special to scientific men. We will begin with the general qualities, with the view of obtaining as exact an idea as may be of the degree in which they are present in the leaders of 1] QUALITIES. 75 science of the present day, neither exaggerating nor under-estimating. ENERGY. When energy, or the secretion of nervous force, is small, the powers of the man are overtasked by his daily duties, his health gives way, and he is soon weeded out of existence by the process of natural selection ; when moderate, it just suffices for the duties and ordinary amuse- ments of his life: he lives, as it were, up to his income, and has nothing to spare. When it is large, he has a surplus to get rid of, or direct, according to his tastes. It may break out in some illegitimate way, or he may utilise it, perhaps in the pursuit of science. It will be seen that the leading scientific men are generally endowed with great energy; many of the most successful among them have laboured as earnest amateurs in extra-professional hours, working far into the night. They have climbed the long and steep ascent from the lower to the upper ranks of life ; they have learnt where the opportunities of 76 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHar. learning were few; they have built up fortunes by perseverance and intelligence, and at the same time have distinguished themselves as original investigators im non-remunerative branches of science. ‘There are other scientific men who possess what is sometimes called quiet energy ; their vital engine is powerful, but the steam is rarely turned fully on. Again, there are others who have fine intellects, without much energy; but these latter classes are quite in the minority. The typical man of science has been at full work from boyhood to old age, and has exuberant spirits and love of adventure in his short holidays, when the engine of his life runs free—temporarily detached from its laborious tasks. We must be on our guard against estimating a man’s energy too strictly by the work he accom- plishes, because it makes great difference whether he loves his work or not. A man with no interest is rapidly fagged. Prisoners are well nourished and cared for, but they cannot perform the task of an ill-fed and ill-housed labourer. Whenever they are forced to do more than their usual small 11.] QUALITIES. 77 amount they show all the symptoms of being overtasked, and sicken. An army in retreat suffers in every way, while one in the advance, being full of hope, may perform prodigious feats. In the following extracts I insert everything that seems deserving of mention as regards the energy of either parent. It will be observed how strong is the tendency for this primary quality | to be transmitted hereditarily. Speaking generally of these and all other extracts printed in this book, I should give the following explanation :— Whenever anything is interpolated by me it is put in square brackets[{ |. All proper names are replaced by dots, because I do not wish to administer to the love of gossip. It is indeed impossible to prevent intimate friends from some- times guessing the name of the author, but I have taken care that nothing is inserted which can cause annoyance. I have taken some trifling editorial liberties, such as occasionally working the words of the question into the answer, when the latter was too curt to explain itself; and 78 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHAP, in a few cases the third person has been turned into the first, for the sake of uniformity. Extracts from Returns. ENERGY MUCH ABOVE THE AVERAGE—-FORTY CASES. 1. “ Travelling almost continually from 1846 up to the present time. Restless. All life ac- customed to extremely rough travel; often months without house or tent. Of mind— restless. “ Father—Very energetic; restless. In old age travelled considerably. Mentally restless. Mother—Quiet and delicate.” 2. “When young, and to et. thirty or more, worked habitually till two and three A.m., often all night. Travelled much in various climates. Much endurance of fatigue and hard living—[an excellent mountaineer]. Of mind—|has risen to the highest position in his branch of science and conducts an enormous correspondence on a variety of technical and scientific subjects |. a 11] QUALITIES. 79 “ Fauther—Very considerable energy both in body and mind. Mother—bBelow the average in bodily energy, but remarkably active mentally.” 3. “ When fishing or shooting (my only occu- pation during the holidays) I am the whole day on my legs. Of mind—lIn thirteen years | examined and named some 40,000 examples, de- scribed about 7,000 species, wrote some 6,000 pages of printed matter, carrying on at the same time a great deal of correspondence. “ Father—I cannot say. Mother—lIs active the whole day. At the age of sixty-three she took sole charge of my child, then but a few weeks old, nursing it for three years, night and day. Energy of mind equal to that of her body.” 4. “Remarkable energy and activity of body, and Power of enduring fatigue and going without food. Extremely fond of and an adept at all field sports. Abstemious. Of mind—Vigorous pursuit of scientific experiments and investiga- tions, of investment and management of money, business transactions, &c. 80 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cuar. “ Father—Active in field sports; has ridde n sixty miles before dinner. Abstemious. Ener- getic in mind. Mother—Much energy, as shown by activity and power of enduring fatigue. Great physical courage and presence of mind in danger.” 5. “ Remarkable for athletic exercises when at Cambridge. In early life encountered great fatigue with the army, as... . during the . war. | “ Father—Great activity and immense energy in the practice of his profession. A man of most powerful intellect.” 6. “I have been and still am a strong walker, both mountaineering and deer-stalking. I never knew what it was to be tired, but, after the hardest day, was ready to start again with six hours’sleep. Although in my sixty-seventh year, I am still an indefatigable deer-stalker.” 7. “Strong when young—walked many a time fifty miles a day without fatigue, and kept up five miles an hour for three or four hours. an] QUALITIES. 81 “Father—Remarkable energy of body up to _ the age of thirty,as shown..... Of mind— Remarkable energy from early youth to his death (brought on by accident at seventy-three), when he was as actively engaged as ever in preparing _ for experiments [ official and of a very multifarious kind]. Mother—Remarkable energy of mind in assisting her father in the preparation of his lec- tures, and afterwards her husband in his official correspondence and writings. After his death she wrote largely in magazines, and eet. eighty-five published “Suggestions for . . . . [certain improvements in administration ].” 8. “ When under twenty, have walked twenty miles before breakfast; when about thirty-two, _ walked forty-five miles ; dined and danced till two in the morning without fatigue. At the age of twenty-six, during fourteen days, was only three hours per night in bed, and on two of the nights was up all night preparing for. . . [certain scientific work.] Fond of mountaineering.” 9. “Considerable energy and power of en- during fatigue; rough travelling on small means G 82 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cmar, in . . . [partly-civilized countries.] Have rowed myself in a skiff 105 miles in twenty-one hours whilst undergraduate at . . .; rowed in eve y race during my stay at the saaigeees ; rowe i two years in the university crew [Oxford an 1 Cambridge races. | “ Father—| Many examples of his energy in his . life.] Of mind—eonsiderable, compilin o and writing on a great variety of subjects, whilst at the same time carrying on-a system of . . . observations, and for years together. Mother—Energy of mind very similar to that. of my father; joining nightly in... obser- vations, daily in writing or drawing . 10. ‘ Very active in business, preferring walk- ing to the compulsory driving ; occupied fourteen or fifteen hours a day without distress ; restless- ness kept under conscious restraint ; longing for adventurous travel, but hindered. Of mince I doubt whether anyone in my profession has done more work, if I may reckon the total work done in... &¢, &¢; and I worked’ nearly as hare while a student. QUALITIES. 83 “ Father—As a young man, an active cricketer and volunteer officer. A very earnest, active man in business, heavily engaged in it from the age of eighteen. Besides, he took an active part in town affairs and the management of many asso- ciations. Mother—A good walker, very active in the management of her house. Although she had a very large family, and took most diligent eare of them, she was always at work, collecting all manner of things, arranging, describing, cor- responding, painting, copying; she was never idle.” 11. “I seem to possess the same unweariedness as my father, and find myself trotting in the streets as my father used to do. ; “ Father—Was very untiring ; he tells me he has ridden 100 miles in a day. He could walk up one of the North Wales hills when nearly seventy, and used to go long distances in London, passing } ) i] | often from a walk into a run.’ 12. “In early life, occasionally working the night through. Great adroitness at games; fast Tunner ; got the prize for fencing at... On G 2 84 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cuar. board a man-of-war in 18 . did feats of agility, such as going up a rope hand over hand, which none of the midshipmen would attempt. “ Father—Great amount of quiet energy. In mind, great energy and perseverance, which lasted to the end of his life. Thus he had known little — Greek, but studied it when an old man for the sake of his. . . researches ; also Aramaic. Mother —Active housemother.” 13. “ Habitually travel by night without inter- fering with work of any kind carried on during the day. Active habits and great power of en- — during fatigue.” 14, “I was in youth and early manhood bodily active, a good runner and leaper, excelling almost all my schoolfellows [the school was a large one | in both points, and a persistent walker. Jn mind—During the best fifty years of my life l went through a large amount of brain-work, and — vigorously pursued the several interests indicated in the enumeration of my several occupations. “ Father—In bodily activity much like my- self, with the addition that he was a good ; E q u] | QUALITIES. 85 swimmer. Jn mind—Capable of great occasional exertion rather than of sustained effort. Mother —In mind, very energetic within a limited range. Always showed great courage, fortitude, and equanimity. In her nursing duties, whether of young or old, was active, persevering, and re- markably successful.” 15. “ At the age of sixty made a tour, chiefly pedestrian, of four weeks in the Alps ; ascended Cima di Jazi ; crossed St. Théodule Pass, walking sometimes thirty miles a day; et. 67, grouse- shooting and deer-stalking. Walk six miles daily to present date. Of mind—See list and dates of works and papers [an enormous amount of work]. “ Father — Active disposition; he let his family estate, entered largely into mercantile pursuits, and died [abroad ].” 16. ““When young, a very quick runner and jumper; good shot with a bow and arrow. In middle age, walked to extent of twenty-five miles a day for many months, forty miles in one day, 86 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHar, rarely tired. Of mind—Im carly life, any 4 amount, provided the subject was interesting.” 17. “At times, great fatigue has been gone through in connection with my profession. Jn mind—A. good deal of continued power of brain- work ; mental fatigue is a sensation not known. “‘ Father—Very energetic. In mind, remark- ably so. Having been ruined in early life, he 4 articled himself to a solicitor when he was thirty- five years of age; procured good practice, and wrote [a small technical book] on law. Mother— Loved to go through much fatigue. In mind very energetic ; added greatly to the- income of her family by her writings.” 18. “ Active bodily work an absolute necessity of my being; without it my epigastrium would gnaw itself into fiddle-strings. Jn mind—My — scientific works must answer this question | they — are very considerable |. “ Father—Decidedly active and energetic a used to go out fossil-hunting when it was too ; late to follow his occupation [which involved u.] QUALITIES. 87 out-of-door work, lasting all day and fatiguing to the muscles}. Mother—Very industrious.” 19.—* Excelled at school and college in athletic sports, especially in long jumping (18 feet). In mind—Almost incapable of fatigue up to the age of thirty-eight. Usually engaged in literary work until long after midnight. “ Father—Remarkably active habits ; a great reader when not engaged in drawing and writing.” 20. “Excellent walker; great endurance of fatigue [facts are given.| Jn mind—aActive mental effort all my life; have had abundance of active employment ; am now doing duty as . ... [numerous honorary offices of the first rank in importance and labour. | “ Father—Energetic, with considerable endur- ance; good swimmer. Jn mind, he had much the same active employment as myself; he took an active share in science, politics, and in religion, Mother—Active habits ; she had great power of doing work and carrying on business.” 88 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHAP, 21. “When a boy of thirteem I walked forty- eight miles in one day, fifty the next, and about — twenty the third; when grown up, my powers were ordinary, certainly not above the average. In mind—Naturally indolent ; disinclined to work unless with a large object. [N.B. I insert this moderate statement because my correspon- dent adheres to it verbally, and gives facts and reasons which I cannot controvert ; nevertheless, if energy is to be measured by work actually accomplished, and if my correspondent’s work be compared with that of other men, the estimate of - his energy would be prodigiously increased. | “ Father—When a young man he and two brothers walked sixty miles in one day. Much mental energy ; ready for all purposes. When old he was astonished at the amount of work in ... + hedid when young. Mother—Ordinary, both bodily and mental.” 22. “Has done his chief brain-work between ten p.m. and two a.m., besides all the day 4 labour; rests perfectly during a night railway journey. .] QUALITIES. 89 “ Father—Great energy, and very active ; capable of enduring great fatigue.” 23. “Active and energetic from infancy to eighty-four years of age. In mind—lI must leave my works to answer this question ; but I believe I have been a hard worker during the whole period of my existence. [N.B. No doubt of it.] “ Father—Energetic, both in body and mind 5 muscular; agreat reader. Mother—Delicate, but active and intelligent.” 24, “A strong walker and oarsman ; can write more rapidly than any man I ever met (thirty folios of seventy-two words, equal to 2160 words an hour.) Jn mind—Have always worked long hours and very fast. “ Father—Remarkable energy and endurance, notwithstanding asthma : very hardworking as a Mother—Physically weak, but has had a large family ; has done a great deal of original as well as of steady work.” 25. “lama hard rider with hounds, fond of mountaineering, and not easily tired. 90°: ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [CHAP. “ Father—An active man all his life, riding every day, and always about, although over eighty.” 26. “Energy shown by much activity, and, whilst I had health, power of resisting fatigue. I and one other man were alone able to fetch water for a large party of officers and men utterly prostrated [other facts given in illus- tration of undoubted energy.| In mind— Shown by vigorous and long-continued work on same subject, as twenty years on. . and nine years on . “ Kather—Great power of endurance, although feeling much fatigue, as after consultations after long journeys; very active; not restless. Jn mind—Habitually very active, as shown in con- versation with a succession of people during the whole day.” 27. “Considerable enduring power in fulfilling any given task or duty; have dissected con- tinually for three or four weeks eight or nine hours a day, devoting some sixteen hours to the work at critical times. Jn mind—Considerable. a ae SE te» PRE i, SE _— ee eee - a e : r 1] QUALITIES. 91 Wrote and superintended first edition of .... , giving instructions to artists regarding from 200 to 8300 woodcuts, correcting press, &c., without assistance, in about seven months |[all this in addition to professional work]; hard work for mind as well as body.” 28. “Energetic. Jn mind—T( extraordinarily so, both in administrative and in original work. “Father—Hnergetic. Author of, I think, more than seventy scientific memoirs.” 29. [Formerly great power of railway travel without fatigue. In mind— hh se — al 11.] _ QUALITIES. 107 herited. First, independence of judgment which prompted me to learn for myself what I wanted to know. Secondly, earnestness, determination, and perseverance in acquiring such knowledge, often under difficulties, and in the face of routine business occupation; and thirdly, a business- like, practical, logical way of looking at things, which enabled me to direct attention to the important and relevant, neglecting the unim- portant and irrelevant points in what I had to study and do.” MEMORY. Memory is very variable in power and char- acter, perhaps no other quality is more so. It is an important ingredient in that aggregate of faculties which form general scientific ability, as is shown by the fact that about one quarter of the men on my list possess it in a high degree, but it is not an essential one, because it is defective in about one case in fourteen. A good memory is of greater importance to the young student who has much to learn, than 108 ) ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [ CHAP, | to the advanced philosophers who has chiefly to reflect, and who knows where to refer for information. Memory is usually defective in persons of small ability, but not invariably so; even among idiots it may be sharp. There are two cases of this recorded in the autobiography of the late Mrs. Somerville (p. 92.) One cannot but suspect some ex- aggeration in the statements, and feel regret that the cases were not fully inquired into, both as regards the precise power of memory, and the degree of development of the other faculties. She says of the first idiot, “ He never failed to go to kirk, and on return- ing home could repeat the sermon word for word, saying, ‘‘ Here the minister coughed, here he stopped to blow his nose.” She then speaks of “another idiot who knew the Bible so per- fectly, that if you asked him where such a verse was to be found, he could tell without hesitation and repeat the chapter.” I have sorted such of the replies as are of interest, into the following groups. (1) Good verbal memory, as for prose and poetry, 6 cases ; il lent eats 11. | QUALITIES, 109 (2) good memory for facts and figures, 9 cases ; (3) good memory for form, 6 cases; (4) good memory for names in natural history, 4 — cases; (5) good memory, no details, 5 cases ; (6) fitful and peculiar memory, 6 cases; (7) bad memory, 7 cases. ‘Total number of note- worthy cases, 43. I have not included in the above, a few instances in which the scientific man has described his own memory, simply as “good,” nor others in which he has made no remark, except that one of his parents had very good memory. The hereditary character of this quality is abundantly illustrated. Good verbal memory, as for prose and poetry. 1. “ Very great, both for facts and words; I could in my earlier days often retain poetry after two perusals, and once learned, it was seldom forgotten. I have seldom met a quicker or more retentive memory in any one.” 2. “After reading over a lecture or speech of an hour’s duration, three times, can recollect nearly the words as written for 8 or 10 days.” 110 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cuar. [I am informed verbally by this correspondent, — that he is obliged to abstain from ‘writing out q his addresses, &c., beforehand, otherwise he } has found the memory of what he wrote to be so strong and exacting as to make it difficult — to him to deviate from it and accommodate his a language to the current temper of his audience.] _ “* Mother—KExcellent memory.” 3. “Considerable, both verbal and objective ; — great facility in quotations; familiarity with — large collections of coins and specimens. | “ Father and Mother—both good memories.” 4. “In childhood, all the Psalms, old ver- sion ; much old English poetry ; - afterwards, — nearly the whole Latin grammar (Eton), Virgil, - Ovid, Lucan; still later, considerable parts of the Iliad, Odyssey, &c., could be, and partly can [still] be, repeated ex memorid; zoological, — botanical, mineralogical and paleontological names in abundance.” 5. “ My memory was very good. I remember as a boy, to have read Schiller’s ‘Thirty Years’ 1. | QUALITIES. 111 War;’ I could afterwards without effort, say pages of the work by heart.” 6. “At school I used to learn in a single evening 100 lines of Virgil, and repeat them correctly in the morning. a “ Father—very good.” f é Good memory for facts and figures. % 1. “Next to no verbal memory, but good for ___ facts small or great which will fit into any chain of reasoning.” 2. “Of moderate verbal memory, ‘but strongly retentive of facts and figures so far as they are related to any subject on or in which [| was engaged. “ Hather—Memory very retentive, but not systematic. He had a great amount of in- formation, but had not great acquirements ; his familiarity with Scripture was, however, re- markable. Mother—Very retentive for small facts and figures.” 112 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [otc 3. “ My memory of things learnt early in life (as dates, rules, examples of grammar, &c.) very retentive, but of all isolated facts of subsequent occurrence, as the birthdays of my children, and the dates of events of my own life, I am singularly destitute of retentive power. On the other hand, of whatever is linked by rational association with any subject in which I take an — interest, my memory is very good. ’ — “ Kather—The power of his memory was shown by the great range of his acquirements ; ‘ he had greater power of remembering isolated q | facts than I have.” 4. “T should say far above the average. I can now refer to note-books of 30 years past — and select a special observation. In other words, — it is a capital working memory. I never tried — to learn pages of poetry, &c.; in this I should : probably have failed.” : _ 5. “ Memory exceedingly strong and retentive, especially of dates, figures and events. “Father and Mother—both had good memo-— ries,” QUALITIES, 88 ee ‘ : : 6. Great memory for figures; can get up pages for examination before committees, and dismiss them from memory afterwards. Strong recollection of scenery.” 7. “Very retentive memory, especially of SF * . Ba. ty ; acts, circumstances, and individuals.” _ 8. “Never kept a diary ; clear remembrance ‘of events in childhood with their dates in every year from the age of six onwards. Solve prob- lems better out of doors than in the study, an forget useless knowledge such as formule, Y les, gossip, &c., very fast.” _ 9. “Bad memory for names and dates, but good as regards facts or circumstances ; princi- _ ples in physical science are clearly retained. 4 “ Father—Excellent memory for historical ,- events, including dates and names in ancient and modern history. Mother — Moderately -. good,” Z Good memory for form. x. ‘ , ‘ vespects. Vivid and generally very accurate as we. : I. “Memory most treacherous except in certain I ‘ ial ~~ id s . “= - * 114 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cuar. to places and visual images. As to thousands — and perhaps tens of thousands of specimens and plants, can remember the exact spot where each was gathered. As to a multitude of facts that should have interested me,’ my memory is a_ blank and the original impression revived with difficulty if at all... . Very retentive and accurate as to the sequence of impressions from early childhood onwards. “ Father — Remarkably Poteitive ~memory ; quoted long passages from classical authors not seen for a very long time previous. Shortly before his death, at 73, recited a long passage from ‘Gibbon,’ not read for fifty years before. Mother—Memory not reliable generally, but— clinging strongly to special scenes and events.” 2. “I recognize most of the animal forms which I have previously examined, but I forget easily the details of their structure, also thei . systematic names (specific, not generic). Like , wise I have a good memory for faces, but not for names of persons; could never remember historical dates.” u. |. QUALITIES. | 115 3. “Great power of remembering forms and points of objective interest; none of numbers or abstract arguments. Languages, poetry, &c., soon lost if not kept up.” 4. “Strong local memory especially of scenery.” 5. “ Very good memory for ideas and general notions, also of persons and places seen ; verbal memory not at all good. Mother— Good memory. ” 6. “Great memory for faces and objects once seen.” 7. “A good memory for faces, for locality, for things, for events, for scientific facts; but not particularly good for figures or quantities, except in all necessary routine, as in prescribing and in subjects of lecture. Never failed to recall what I desired, in my lectures. “ Father—An excellent memory ; was a very first-rate whist player. Mother—An excellent memory ; played a capital game at whist.” 1 ) = 116 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. — The power of recollecting a multitude of grotesque and barbarou s names, which all naturalists must possess to a considerable degree, and which seems so extraordinary to persons who are not naturalists, is hardly — alluded to in these returns. It would appear that our most eminent naturalists are not very specially gifted among their fellow-workers in this respect. Here are a few cases of a rather good memory of the kind :— 1. “Memory strong up to the age of 38 : still good and capable of recognizing and naming probably between two and three thousand species’ of animals and plants, including fossil forms. ’ “* Father—Remarkable ; capable of accurately repeating from memory the substance of speeches” delivered at clerical and other meetings.” E rather deficient in other respects, especially as to 2. “Retentive of botanical names ; persons, » u.] QUALITIES, 117 3. “ Retentive for nomenclature, but not for numbers or history.” 4, “. . . . during practitional life I have gone over the foraminiferze and remember all their names.” Good memory, no particulars given. 1. “Very remarkable retentiveness of memory. “ Father-—Good. Mother—Very good, full of anecdote.” 2. “Very good memory as far as my 85th | birthday.” 3. “ Very good. “ Father—Good.” 4, “Very retentive, but not exactly accurate.” 5. “Retentive memory for what was of in- terest, and very accurate. “ Father—Retentive.” 6. “Very good as a boy and young man.” 118 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE, [omar | ni Fitful and peculiar memory. 1. “Occasionally remarkable, but very fitful. I have occasionally been able to repeat pages after once or twice reading; at other times it is below the average. A power of eliminating — retaining the salient points of what I read, it interests me, but very bad memory for sal . and details.” q “Although I can speak for an hour or two from a few notes, I could not repeat correctly a few sentences from memory. , “Father—Remarkable for good verbal memory; could repeat pages of poetry and speeches, without mistake, a striking contrast to my own memory.” 3. “My father and myself have memories of the same character; treacherous in matters of business and very retentive of scraps of verse read over and learnt long ago. When my father was to have met me, a little boy returning from school at the end of the half, he would forget A u.] , QUALITIES. 119 all about it. My engagements sometimes suffer ... [from similar forgetfulness].” 4. “Memory very retentive in regard to in- cidents and events, but could never learn by rote except with great effort. Often surprise my patients by recollection of their symptoms, but am often at a loss to connect the names with their faces. “ Father—Memory remarkably retentive, espe- elally as to the various events of his life and time.” 5. “Memory very bad for dates and for learning by rote, but [extraordinarily] good in retaining a general or vague recollection of many facts. “ Father—Wonderful memory for dates; in old age he told a person, reading aloud to him a book only once read in youth, the passages which were coming; he knew the birthdays and those of the deaths, &c., of all his friends and acquaintances,” 6. ““A peculiar memory; bad for names of 120 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [CHAP. persons, plants, places, &c. #good for subjects comnected with others; not bad for numbers. “ Father—A most marvellously retentive memory ; he could relate minute details of his- torical occurrences, names of actors in politics, almost all he had ever read (he was a great reader), and was in consequence a most lively companion. Mother—Not very good.” Bad memory. t. [A physicist informs me that his memory is unable to retain even the commonest constants in habitual use, and that the selection of his special line of investigation was governed by his sense of this disability. ] 2. “Bad memory ; from boyhood incapable of learning school tasks by heart, though retain- ing a knowledge of principles and methods.” 3. “I have a very poor memory; I was once a whole fortnight in recovering the name of .... , but I got it at last. I consider that all attempts at making me learn poetry, and in 2 ? 1 i1. | QUALITIES. 121 particular Latin poetry [at school] were eros mistakes; IJ was never benefited in the least. Reasoning was my forte, and I could never do anything by rote.” 4. “A bad memory, especially for names.” 5. “Not possessed of a retentive memory either in small matters or large ones, except in those in which I take a special interest.” 6. “I was always slow at learning.” 7. “Memory not retentive; very much under the influence of association and suggestion. ‘* Father—Memory very retentive as to prin- ciples, facts, and incidents; not much so as to names of persons and objects. Mother—Not retentive.” INDEPENDENCE OF CHARACTER. We now come to the qualities that are of especial service to scientific men; those al- ready mentioned, of energy, health, steadi- ness of pursuit, business habits and memory, being of general utility. The first of these is 122 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [CHAP. independence of character. Wifty of my corre- spondents show that they possess it in excess, and in only two is it below par. Here are a few examples :— 1. “ Left, et. 12 [that is, ran away from], a school where I had received injustice from the master.” 2. “Opinions in almost all respects opposed to those in which I was educated.” 3. “TI have always taken my own independent line. My heresy prevented my advancement.” 4. “Preference tor whatever is not the fashion, not popular, not rich, not very able to help itself, yet with qualities unworthily overlooked or unjustly oppressed.” The home atmosphere which the scientific men. breathed in their youth was generally saturated _ with the spirit of independence. Examples :— 1. “ My father was extremely independent, in some respects more so than I am. He never altered the fashion of his dress ; he never took off ’ his hat to anyone in his life, and never addressed anyone as Esq.” 2. “My father was a Liberal when Liberalism (then styled Jacobinism) was highly obnoxious, an early denouncer of slavery nate gl oe rey == $ i] QUALITIES. 123 and advocate of religious liberty, a free-trader when the world was protectionist, and an op- ponent of unrighteous war when war was most popular. He was for mitigating our criminal code when hanging was regarded as the sheet- anchor, and, in a word, was politically and socially a very independent spirit.” 3. “My father [an exceedingly humane and courayeous “man, who was a master in the Royal Navy] would never, unless compelled, attend the flog- ging of seamen, a punishment mercilessly and unsparingly administered in. his days (1800- 1815).” 4. “It was marked in my father; he held Jacobite opinions, when it was not very safe to hold them.” 5. “ Maintenance by my father of religious and political creeds at a time when these creeds were unpopular and often disqualifying.” In confirmation of the assertion that the scien- tific men were usually brought up in families characterized by independence of disposition, I would refer to the strange variety of small and unfashionable religious sects to which they or their parents belonged. We all know that 124 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [CHAP. Dalton, the discoverer of thé*atomic theory, and Dr. Young, of the undulatory theory of light, were both Quakers, and that Faraday was a Sandemanian. So I find in these returns numerous cases of Quaker pedigree ; and I know of one man, not as yet technically on my list, who was born a Sandemanian. There are also representatives of several other small sects, as -Moravians and Bible Christians, and the Uni- - tarians are numerous. It will be understood that the object of saying this is not to throw light on. the religious tendencies of the scientific men (concerning which | shall have almost imme- diately to speak), because so off-hand a statement would mislead, but to prove that they and their parents had the habit of doimg what they preferred, without considering the fashion of the day. The man of science is thoroughly inde- pendent in character. MECHANICAL APTITUDE. There is a prevalent taste for mechanics amone scientific men, whose peculiarity it is 11. ] QUALITIES. ‘| ObS6 to be interested in things more than in persons. One would have expected. to find it developed among physicists; and, as a fact, eight of them possess it in a high degree, and similarly among mechanicians and engineers, all of whom must possess it, and four of whom testify to it, but it seems just as strong among the rest. Here are instances and extracts :— Chemistry.—1. ‘Constructed a _ reflecting telescope, with 12-inch aperture.” 2. ‘Ground, polished, and silvered a 7-ineh glass speculum, and mounted it equatorially.” Geology.—3. “Considerable mechanical skill.” Brology.—4. “ Always fond of constructing ; school nickname, ‘Archimedes.’ If I had followed my profession should probably have been-[very successful as | an engineer.” 5. “Very fond of mechanical contrivances. Invented and made my own toys as a child. Mechanical tastes are still largely indulged in intervals of leisure.” 6. ‘Special love of mechanics; a good amateur cabinet- maker and blacksmith. Made lithotrites,” 7. “Talent for mechanics.” 8. [Was extremely ingenious in devising modes of preserving and 126 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [onap, exhibiting objects of natural history]. 9. _“ Strong natural inclination towards mechanism.” [His present profession was accidental and against the grain]. 10 and 11. “ Aptitude for mechanism.” 12. “A decided turn for j mechanical pursuits, both in arrangement and~ construction.” Statistics.—13. “Fond of and quick in understanding machinery.” 14. “I always took great interest in mechanical im- — provement.” 15. “I often feel a positive pain — in passing an object of which I do not compre-— hend the meaning and construction.” RELIGIOUS BIAS. It appears that out of every ten scientific men, seven call themselves members of the established Churches of England, Scotland, or of the now disestablished Church of Ireland, and three belong to one or more of the following sects, which I name in the order in which they are i most numerously represented :— F 1. None whatever; 2. established Church _ with qualification; 3. Unitarian; 4. Noncon- 11. | QUALITIES. 127 formist; 5. Wesleyan; 6. Catholic; 7. Bible Christian. There is much Quaker, and even some Moravian blood, but there are none who eS a ee “se have sent me returns who still profess those ereeds. ‘The creeds of the parents are somewhat more varied than the above, and the Unitarian element is stronger. The religious feeling of men of science is necessarily of a peculiar character. Being thoughtful men, they are probably more occu- pied with religious ideas than the generality of people ; but, being exacting of evidence and questioners of authority, they sturdily object to much that others accept easily. But what is “religion?” Itis one of the vaguest of words. Let us try to express ourselves more clearly. I think we may assume that the general ten- dency of scientific men is to take a “ philosophic ” view of life; that is, to show some disregard of the petty, transient events which chiefly absorb the attention of mean minds, and to feel most at peace when their thoughts are reposing on the larger and more enduring aspects of the moral and material world. Also, it would be easy to 128 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [ec IAP show that no class in the e¢ommunity are more active as philanthropists than scientific men. Be 1 these tendencies do not cover the meaning of : the phrase, “religious bias ” in its technical sense, So far as I understand that sense, it comprises three elements :— | | 1. Great prevalence of the intuitive séntiments ; so much so, that conflicting matters of observa- tion are apt to be laid aside, out of sight an 1 mind. The intuitive sense of a supreme God, = ~ who communes with our hearts and directs Us. 2, A sense of extreme sin and weakness, as ex pressed by the liturgical phrases, “ No power of ourselves to help ourselves,” “ Through the weak- ness of our mortal nature we can do no good thing without Thee,” &c. 3. Revelation of a future life and of other matters variously in- terpreted by different sects, which, more or less, satisfy the intuitive sentiments. { I did not enter into these details in framing” my questions, but simply asked in general terms whether or no my correspondents had a strong religious bias. The interpretation I put on the answers which are subjoined, is that religion, in” om] QUALITIES. 129 ‘the sense of the third paragraph, is not actively accepted by many of those who describe them- ‘selves as religiously inclined: they seem “singularly careless of dogma, and exempt from ‘mysterious terror. Also, considering the inde- "pendence of their disposition, their energetic temperament and healthful physique, I should think that religion, in the sense of the second “paragraph—that of feeling sinful and weak— would not express the views of many of them. "Therefore I look on the intuitive sentiments, “as described in the first paragraph, connected with a philosophic frame of mind and a ten- Biency to active philanthropy, as the most likely “meaning of the phrase “ religious bias,” when it is used without any qualification by my corre- _ Spondents, especially by those who are Unitarians. In this sense, at least, there appear to be about eighteen instances of scientific men who have a decided religious bias ; being, I should estimate, at the rate of two or more, in every ten; but Tam not able to state with certainty how many of these are religious in the sense of all the three paragraphs. 130 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. Religious sentiments weak, accompanied with more or less Scepticism.—1. [Being compelled to attend frequent chapels at college, he, f or ten years afterwards, refused to enter eith or church or chapel]. 2. “The negative te a z dencies of my family may be absence of piety ” 3. “ Religious feeling not great.” ; “Sceptical.” 5. “Not much religious bias ex- cept in a boundless admiration of nature.” 6. ‘‘T gave up common religious belief, alm ost | independently from my own reflection.” 13 “Bias towards freedom of thought in religiot is matters.” Intellectual interest in religious topics.—l. “ Entertained at an early age independent views regarding the resurrection and salvation of the heathen, which led to frequent disputes.” 2. ‘At school I became a sceptic, and even worked out in my own somewhat (at that time) reserved mind, a kind of idealism. I afterwards had Q phase of religious fervour, but worked thro ah it.” 3. “Given to theological ideas, and not reticent about them.” 4 “Instinctive (6 m1) QUALITIES, 131 ¢ riginal) religious bias, though this may be in part due to early training.... I take con- ‘siderable pains in the investigation of religious 1 matters, one of my amusements being the collec- tion of a considerable theological library, with ‘the books of which I am familiar.” Dogmatic interest—* fession was not necessary to a useful life. (a, ¢, f) | (17) “My taste for mathematics appears in- nate. As a boy, I delighted in sums. I trace the origin of my interest im general science to my acquaintance with...., which dates from the time when I was about 15 years of age. I taught myself in mathematics and chemistry during my apprenticeship to a civil engineer and land surveyor, and subsequently studied .... [abroad]. My scientific tastes were largely developed through my first going [to the con- tinent| with... .” (a, f) | (18) “An early taste for arithmetic, and in particular for long division sums.” (a) ul. ] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 157 (19) [The following is an extract from bio- graphical notes kindly communicated to me of the late Archibald Smith.| “Yachting would give an interest to all nautical matters, and the intimacy of his father with .... gave a bias towards magnetism. In a letter to one of his sisters (no date, ? about 1838), he says:—‘..... told me he was going to write directions for ships, finding and allowing for the error caused by the local attraction of ships. So, for my own amusement and partly to help him, I wrote a set of instructions and gave them to him.’ His mind was thus turned to the subject. I think it was natural to him to inquire into the reason of things. Fond of figures when a_ boy.” (a, b, ¢, f) (20) “My interest in mathematics began at .... [university], and was mainly due to the energy and encouragement of my tutor... . ; but Professor... . first inspired me with the sense of the magnificence of mathematics.” (g) 158 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE, _[cwar. ; ~ . CHEMISTRY. (1) “Thoroughly innate. My first taste for 3 chemistry dates from the possession of a che- — mical box, when I was a little boy. Whenever I had a chance of turning from other studies to natural science, I always turned. I liked ; play better than all other work, and chemistry better than play.” (a, b) | (2) “Perhaps wholly innate. My first no- tions, of chemistry were picked up from. books, and I got the nickname of ‘ experimentalizer ” at school. My taste for zoology arose through friendship with .... My tastes were largely determined by three years’ voluntary work at chemistry, under Dr... . . ’ (a, f) (3) “I was always observing and inquiring, and this disposition was never checked nor ridi- culed in my childhood. My taste for chemistry ° dates from the lectures I attended as a boy, and to the permission to carry on little experiments — at home in a room set apart for the purpose. 7 I was encouraged in my tastes at home. Sub- ae. nt] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 159 sequent determining events were my residing abroad, and my mother making a home for me there.” (a, 0, e) (4) “They-date from a very early period, and there was little to produce them in my early surroundings. As a small boy I was fond of reading books bearing on natural science. I was taught at home with my brothers, and was partially self-taught also. We had always the example of industry, and were encouraged to think for ourselves. I first studied chemistry at . . . '. College.” (a, e) (5) “From an early age I had an innate taste for all branches of natural science. As a boy, I made large collections of dried plants, minerals, beetles, butterflies, stuffed birds, &. At.... I studied without regard to future profession for two years, and only took up chemistry as a special study on my third year’s residence there.” (a, c) (6) “I cannot trace the origin. I began to study chemistry et. 18, and pursued it at such 160 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHaP. times as my duties in. . ™. gave me leisure, — and without any instructor. The obtaining of correct and accurate results in chemical analysis — gave me great satisfaction.” (c) (7) “Scareely innate. I ascribe the origin of my scientific interests chiefly to being sent as a pupil to an eminent man of science, Professor Bey na, & Subsequently I was a good deal abstracted from scientific pursuits by an early and lasting friendship with ...., who directed my thoughts | to public work.” (g) — | (8) “I watched, at school, the building of a steam engine at a factory, and completely got up the whole engine. This gave my mind a start. .... My father gave me ‘ Henry’s Chemistry ; ’ that, and afterwards ‘Turner's Chemistry,’ were more interesting to me than any books of fiction. ....I believe at one time I read little else but ‘Turner’s Chemistry’ and books of poetry ‘in whatever holiday I had... . I owe to my — mother a child’s curiosity and afterwards a man’s — reverence for scientific truth. I cannot tell if — my scientific tastes were innate. The university, al eal Cte RR Ro It. ] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 161 inviting me to fill the... . chair, gave my work its bent... .. ” (d, e) (9) “I can trace my interest in chemistry to reading by accident a book upon it.” (0) (10) “I did nothing, even quwasi-scientific, till after leaving college; nothing serious till et. 23. My pursuit of chemistry is entirely due to circumstances occurring after manhood, and ‘in direct opposition to family influences.” (z) pri) * To the opportunity afforded for study of science at... My tastes received no en- couragement whatever from relations, my mother ; excepted.” (e, 2) GEOLOGY. | (1) “ Decidedly innate as regards coins and fossils. My father and an aunt collected coins and geological specimens, and I have both coins and specimens which have been in my _ pos- session since I was 9 years old. Subsequently my pursuits were influenced to some extent by the discoveries in... . , but at that M 162 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [omar. time I had already a considerable collection.” — (a, ¢, e) (2) “A natural taste for observing and | generalizing, developed by noticing the fossili- — ferous rocks which happened to occur in the — neighbourhood of the school where I was. Afterwards the surgeon to whom I was articled, 3 who had an observant mind, fostered my ; tastes.” (a, b, f) | (3) “ A natural taste. My interest in science 7 began very early, originating in a love of experi- — ment, at first in chemistry... . . The ultimate 4 direction of my scientific tastes dates after the q completion of my regular education.” (a, ¢) (4) “I believe I may say, innate, to a very q considerable extent, not remembering that any — definite steps were taken to inculcate science. I was indebted in a high degree to collections” made by my father and mother, in...., and to early familiarity with charts of those seas and conversations on matters pertaining thereto. Afterwards, to going to Germany and finding in Si.) ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 163 the mining officers a body of men receiving a regular scientific education. Lastly, to a great extent by going for a winter to... . [in Ger- many|, and by conversations with .... and . .” (a, ef) (5) “I was always fond of natural history ; collected plants, insects, and birds, at [school] and fossils at [college], where ... . ’s lectures attracted me to geology, and subsequently, by the acquaintance of Professor ...., to the particular branch [of it which I have pursued |.” (a,f, 9) (6) “As well as I can recollect, they were in- nate. JI remember, as a boy of 6, seeing a spring in Lavender Hill; not being satisfied at the explanation, and determining to work it out for myself. I believe that I should have devoted | myself to chemistry and physics, but that I was started, as a youth of 19, to travel 10 months out of the twelve on business, and so continued for 20 years. This led to my visiting all Great Britain, and to great opportunities for geolo- gising and determined me to that study. I M 2 164 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. _[omar, worked hard at business all day (a very anxi U 8 business), and at evening and night would wo k hard at chemistry and geology. I found a won- A . derful relief in science.” (a, c) (7) “I believe the desire for information and . habits of observation to be in a great measure q innate. They were first developed by a little | elementary teaching in physics and chemistry, at 4 school, et. 7-13. I worked alone at science at — home, from the age of 11 years, where I was. 7 encouraged by the example of an elder brother, — Subsequently, my pursuits were much influenced 4 by being thrown, at an early age, et. 19, on my ‘ own judgment and resources. I founded a mining colony in the backwoods of ...., and — had to carry it out with several thousand people, q quite alone.” (a, e, h) (8) “ . .. . I was always apt to observe | stones closely with regard to their qualities . [but the scientific taste for geology was not developed till after manhood |. (z) Peri] - firmed and directed by the voyage in the . a ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 165 BIOLOGY. Zoological Subsection. (1) [ Yes. | “‘ Inherited from my father’s family, who have generally been attached to natural history [especially botany—most remarkable ex- amples are given]. My scientific tastes were mS). largely determined by being appointed .... . | (a, d, e) (2) “Certainly innate..... Strongly con- (a, h) (3) “Love of observation and natural history innate ; [I had them] as early as I can remember. My grandfather was very fond of natural history, and a [more distant | relative has written an excellent fauna of .... The helpofMr..... has aided me immensely, but not, I think, altered ‘my tendency.” (a, e, f) ieee? (4) “Homology innate, and derived from my - mother. I trace the origin of my interest in science decidedly to my mother’s observations in 166 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [omar our childhood rambles, on ‘the plants and ani-— mals we saw. She told me that crabs were ‘ sea-spiders,’ and periwinkles (Zittorine) ‘sea-— snails.’ I feel sure she had never read ‘De mraiet ts. ek AG e) | (5) “I believe I inherited my general taste for q scientific pursuits from my grandmother; but . my choosing... . for special investigation re- q sulted from a positive fascination which the very — obscurity of the subject exerted upon my mind. — It was perhaps a mere desire to unravel the q marvellous. My scientific tastes were largely | promoted by the attractive teaching of [| .... various professors|.” (a, ¢, €, 9) (6) “Thoroughly innate. I had no regular — instruction, and can think of no event which especially helped to develop it. Bones and shells : were attractive to me before I could consider them with any apparent profit, and books of natural history were my delight. I had a fair” zoological collection by the time I was 15. My father had no scientific knowledge ; nevertheless, he encouraged me in all my tastes, giving me 111.] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 167 money freely for books and specimens, against the advice of friends; but he was indulgent generally, and not in the scientific direction only.” (a, e) (7) “Innate, as far as a love of nature and of the observation of natural phenomena. I trace the origin of my interest in science to the love of truth and of mental cultivation in my father, and his encouragement of this love in his chil- dren. I do not think it was largely determined by events after manhood.” (a, e) (8) “I should say innate. I caught at all scraps of lessons for self-improvement. My soon-developed enthusiasm must have been de- rived from my mother’s family. As to whether they were largely developed by events occurring after manhood, I think not. All I can gay is, that neither profession nor marriage nor sickness has been able to affect them.” (a, e) (9) “I cannot recollect the time when I was not fond of animals, and of knowing all I could learn about them. Living in the country, I had 168 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE, [cHaP, abundant opportunities for indulging my taste, though, of course, I was not allowed to keep half _ the number of ‘pets’ I should have liked. The 4 example of my father and elder brothers, who 4 were all pretty firm to field sports, was also followed by me, and from field sports to field 4 natural history is but a step. I obtained, by a — piece of sheer good luck, the travelling fellow- — ship of . . . ; it was tenable for nine years, and — its income was sufficient to keep me during that time without being obliged to enter any pro- — fession. Though circumstances subsequently — interfered with my using this assistance to the most advantage, in gratifying my taste for natural history, it was enormously furthered — thereby.” (a, 0, c, e) (10) “My partiality for the natural history sciences was initiated partly by my selection of ~ medicine as a profession, and perhaps even more that, during the period of my apprenticeship, I was much under the influence of a remarkable man... ,a most accomplished naturalist and of singularly independent judgment... For” Sr ‘. 4 & OU ‘ ul. ] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 169 three years I spent every Sunday morning with him. During this time he was constantly stimu- lating me (a willing follower) to work in his department of natural science, and at the same time, ever inculcating a spirit of scientific scepticism.” (d, f) (11) “To love of birds, their study, their dissection. [remember trying to find out in the structure of the oviduct the cause of colour and markings in the different eggs. I discovered hairs sticking in the cuckoo’s stomach, arranged in a spiral manner, before I knew that John Hunter had described the same. Then I took to drawing skulls and skeletons, and my fate was sealed. That I inherited a strong love of nature is certain, from my father, who was devoted to horticulture and very fond of birds and of land- scape scenery; but I cannot trace any direct tendencies or work on the part of any member of my family, except my brother. I feel that I must have had a taste for science, independently of external circumstances. At the age of 17 or 18, I had dissected every new kind of bird that I : 170 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cuar. met with. Later opporturities were entirely — made by myself, or.perhaps, rather, taken advan_ 5. tage of by myself.” (a, e) (12) “My love of natural history (so common in boys) showed itself in collecting insects, shells, ! and birds’ eggs, and delighting in reading such books as Stanley on Birds, White’s Selborne, — Waterton, &c., at a very early age (8 years or 4 before), and being rather encouraged than checked, continued to grow till it developed into a fondness for anatomical pursuits generally, which was never abandoned. My taste [for 4 science | was entirely innate ; no [other] member of the family nor early friend or acquaintance had any special taste for any of the natural history sciences. Two brothers, of nearly the same age, and with precisely the same surround- ings, though joining occasionally in some of the above-mentioned boyish pursuits, never pursued — them with real interest, and soon entirely gave them up.” (a, e) (13) “As a boy, I had no taste for natural history, but a passion for mechanical contri- I11.] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 171 vances, physics, and chemistry. I earnestly desired to be an engineer, but the fact that I had a... . [near relative] a medical man, led to my being apprenticed to him, and I took to physiology and anatomy, as the engineering side of my profession. |The inclinations above mentioned were] altogether innate, and, so far as I know, not hereditary; neither of my parents nor any of the family showing any trace of the like tendencies. My appoint- ment to the surveying ship.... made me a comparative anatomist, by affording opportu- nities for the investigation of the structure of the lower animals. My appointment to.... forced me to paleontology.” (a, c, d, h) (14) “My school nickname was ‘ Archimedes ;’ I was always fond of construction. If I had followed my own bent, I should probably have been [successful as|an engineer. My turn for scientific inquiry led me in early life to sys- tematise and generalise the knowledge of others. Latterly I have felt more interest in original investigations.” (a, ¢) 172 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [omar. ~ (15) “I was in a general &tmosphere of scien- tific thinking and discipline. My taste for | biology began with keeping insects; for che- mistry and physics, by being led to try experi- ments. Largely inherited from my father. I have made my circumstances more than they have made me.” (a, ¢, é) (16) “My father’s example influenced me so — early that I have no means of judging, but I~ doubt much their innate. character. Their origin — was’ due primarily, beyond all probability of — doubt, to my father’s influence and example. ~ They were not influenced by subsequent events, but the tastes once planted rather determined the — events. My medical profession caused me to q suspend my scientific pursuits for some years; but the accidental perusal of .... brought me — back again to the study of the... ., and am ; the rest followed in due time.” (6, e) (17) “They appear to have been inherited. — My interest in science arose from the example of my father, and the fact of my being for a year the assistant and close companion of Pro- — > 111.) to one branch et. 21, when appointed... . (a, d, e, 9) ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 173 Be of sis at whose side I visited the poor in the lanes of .... , day and night. First began to work and concentrate energies 7) (18) “They have been, I believe, nearly in an equal degree the mixed result of a natural bias and education, and were determined by profes- sional study, when a love of scientific knowledge for its own sake first took possession of my mind.” (a, d) (19) “How far innate, and how far acquired and developed from my early youth, I cannot say. My love for animals of all kinds was very strong, and to gratify it I overcame every ob- stacle put in my way at home, when I. was a boy. I trace the origin of my interest in science to the earliest impressions of my childhood, all of which, so far as I recollect them, are con- nected with my father, and the various ani- mals he brought me as pets. They were not largely determined by events after manhood. I should have been an observer of animal life 174 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cuar. under any conditions under Which I might have 4 lived.” (a, e) (20) “I cannot trace the origin of my interest 4 in geology. I believe it to have been innate. q I began collecting birds and studying them be- j fore I went to school, and without any induce- — ment. I was always told by my relations that ; my scientific pursuits would stand in my way, but adhered to them notwithstanding. . They 9 were not at all determined by events occurring 9 after I reached manhood ; they simply increased 4g as I grew older.” (a) (21) ‘I perceive no evidence of their being innate [? hereditary], unless I derived any ten- dency from my mother, who was at one time E - much with her ereat-uncle [. ... the founder of one of our great industries] and greatly in- terested in his pursuits. She worked a good ~ deal at chemistry, and was well acquainted with : many of the processes in pottery. I belonged 3 : to an industrious family and saw everyone work- — ing. The attraction I have for chemistry (which & is a strong one, only my profession has never 111. ] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 175 allowed me to follow it very closely) arose from being sent to work, zt. 15, in a chemical laboratory.” (e) (22) “I do not consider them innate, but induced by the following circumstances :—When I was at school, et, 13-15,.a, lady, an old friend of my mother, gave me a few British shells, with their names, and a copy of ‘Turton’s Concho- logical Dictionary.’ I thenceforth diligently collected British shells, and afterwards extended my researches.” (0) (23) “To my father’s example (in science) ; to the profession of medicine (in physiology, ana- tomy, and .... ). It was my interest- in my profession to work at scientific subjects, while young and while waiting for practice. The example of many men whom I knew when young proved a great stimulus and _incen- tive.” (e, d, f) (24) “Not at all innate. I can trace it dis- tinctly to my intercourse with certain professors . ; Subsequently to my desire to. investigate — oe Sh A Se he nt OR EE nee en ee teas oe | SESE et ae ee eae me 176 _ ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE, _[onas. certain scientific questions béaring on medicine, and later to my intercourse with... . and . Poe. d, f, g) BIOLOGY. Botanical Subsection. (1) “My scientific tastes were inborn ” (onal strongly hereditary]. (a) . pe - 6 bm | (2) “As far as the word applies in any case, = I should say decidedly innate. Excepting such influence as a little encouragement at home, I am — unable to trace any external stimulus. At eet. 6, 1 I was given Joyce's ‘ Scientific Dialogues,’ which — I soon mastered, then other books; before et. 8, { ; I commenced making star maps ; eet. 12-13, I 4 made some geological sections with tolerable 4 correctness; and so on. It [then] seemed as if any accident and the love of new vistas 4 were enough to lead me from one branch of — science to another.” (a) (3) “ Always fond of plants.” (a) (4) “ Was always fond of objective and experi- mental knowledge. I date my first efforts of any — TY SS ee ii < un] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 177 consequence from an early intimacy with Pro- fessor . . . , whose pupil and assistant I was. I | had a fondness for science before, but the ne- . cessity for accurate and rigid observation then first dawned upon me. Subsequent events were going to. . . . [abroad], and appointments in .. . [a foreign country, where I was much detained indoors that | compelled me to take to the microscope and study of the lower orders of plants and animals, many of which I could grow in my own room.” (a, ¢, g) (5) “As a youth, I followed, of my own free will, mineralogy, chemistry, anatomy, and me- chanics, but chiefly chemistry. My tastes were certainly not hereditary. ‘They were directed to botany purely through accidental circumstances [which led to a prolonged residence in an imper- fectly civilized country]. I examined its plants, then wholly unknown to Europeans, but was at that time wholly ignorant of the very elements of botany. Was subsequently encouraged by... (eminent botanists of the day|; went to and from England and made extensive collections, N 178 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cmap, My wife actively assisted me in my botanical and other scientific pursuits, and to her advice and assistance I owe much of my success in life.” (a, f; h) (6) “The love for botany was instilled into me — in very early youth by my father. We lived in | the house of .... [a very eminent geologist], in — the vicinity of .. .. , and L often took walks to : those hills and collected plants. I also culti- vated plants in our garden. A taste for natural science, especially botany, seems to have been innate. The companionship of . . . . incited me 7 to prosecute botany with vigour. I was one of F his best pupils, and travelled over a great part q of... . with him.” (e, g) | (7) [A posthumous account.] “He appears to — have been attached to natural history all his life — through, but never took up botany to any extent till the professorship was vacant. [There is” some conflict of testimony here.] I think his” scientific tastes were innate. I have excellent drawings of insects made by him as a schoolboy 5 also, he made a model of a caterpillar ; tried a ia III. | ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 179 little chemistry; made lace with bobbins of his own contriving. .... It was said, ‘ Nothing escapes that boy’s eyes.’” (a, d) (8) “To my father’s encouragement of a natural inclination.” (a, é) (9) “I cannot trace the origin of my interest in any particular branch of science further than that as far as regards . . « . botany, I was thrown into the society of a gentleman who took much interest in it. My scientific tastes originated, as a matter of fact, after leaving .... [the uni- versity |.” (/) (10) “Not innate. I trace the origin of my botanical tastes to leisure; to the accidental receipt of De Candolle’s ‘ Flore frangaise,’ whilst resident in that country; and to encouragement from my mother. They were determined after- wards by independence (considering my absence of ambition to rise in the world) and by friend- ship and encouragement from... . , the four oreatest British botanists of the day.” (b, e, f) N 2 180 _ ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHar. - | - BIOLOGY. Medical Subsection. (1) “Innate in a great degree. I trace the — origin of my interest in science (1) to my mother’s mental activity and love of collecting — and arranging, and my father’s constant en- — couragement of my pursuits; (2) to the friend- — ship of [three eminent. botanists|, by whom I 7 was chiefly induced to study botany; (3) to — my profession, the choice of which was in some 4 measure determined by my taste for collecting ¢ and studying.” (a, d, e, f) (2) “I selected the medical profession because _ it was that of my father. This choice led me to ; scientific pursuits, for which I had no previous 3 predilection, as I had no opportunities that way. I conclude the tastes were innate, as they cer- — tainly showed themselves the moment the — opportunity for developing them occurred, ; namely, at the commencement of my professional — studies, et. 17.” (a, d) 111. ] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 181 (3) “Not at all especially innate. I could have taken to any other subject quite as well, so far as I know. I trace the origin of my interest in science to the knowledge that I must do my best in it to earn a livelihood and to please my parents. I did not follow my own branch from any special likingo—indeed, I disliked it; but it was necessary to follow some branch. The connection with an hospital and medical school in... . have been inducements to continue work, and all my life I have worked pretty steadily.” (d) (4) “I cannot perceive that they were innate. Possibly my tastes were due to retentiveness of memory as to objects and facts, and a strong impression that good surgery is a great fact. Subsequently, by the approval of teachers, when between set. 18 and 20, having been selected chief assistant to the most popular teacher of anatomy of his day, and also to a professor of surgery.” (c, g) (5) “ Had an interest excited in philosophical 182 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cnar, ; x , 5 Ag ° “sm F E inquiries by my father’s acute observations in all — such topics.” (e) (6) “I cannot say that I had naturally a turn q for any pursuit in particular. My addiction to 4 medicine was purely the result of accident. I ] never gave a thought to physic as a subject of study until I was 27 years old.” (d) 4 (7) “ Accidentally [directed] to medicine by associating with a medical friend in a superficial study of botany.” (c, d) STATISTICS. (1) * Certainly my scientific tastes appear to me to have been, so to say, innate.” (a) _ (2) “My interest in science was due to my — having been officially employed in the early part j of [my career, in a very important statistical inquiry],” (d) (3) “ Innate, I think. I inherit many mental — peculiarities and talents from my paternal grand- — father, amongst which is a love of figures and — u1.] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 183 tabulation; none from my father. I cannot [otherwise] trace the origin of my interest in science, nor were my tastes largely determined by events after manhood.” (a) (4) “I should be much inclined to think there was an innate tendency, but that the tastes were developed by a good and for the most part suitable education. When at my first school, set. 103-12, the head-master gave very - clear occasional lessons in moral and economical subjects. I can remember vividly to the present day the impression which those lessons made upon me. As I am not aware that the other boys in the class were equally impressed, | think I must have had an innate interest in those subjects ; but the lessons probably increased the interest very much.” (a, b, g) (5) “I cannot distinguish between what I may have derived from nature and what I may have acquired from intercourse with my father and certain of his friends. When I was 11 years old, my father gave a series of lectures on electricity, mechanics, astronomy, and pneuma- 184 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cILaP. ties, to all of which, but especially to the last, I paid delighted attention. I presently began to construct apparatus for myself. Subsequently practice in teaching led me to seek for know- ledge. Intercourse with men of higher attain- ments became a great spur; my turn for... . was favoured by my opportunities as an early member of the. . . . Society.” (a, ¢, /) (6) “ Professor... . ’s lectures on geology were the origin.of my interest in that science ; the work of the . . . . statistical society in educa- tional inquiries influenced my taste for statistical ‘science; frequent attendance at meetings of the British Association encouraged my scientific tastes.” (d, g) MECHANICAL SCIENCE. (1) “Ifany tastes be innate, mine were; they date from beyond my recollection. They were not determined by events after manhood, but, I think the reverse; they were discouraged in every way.” (a) 111. | ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 185 (2) “Decidedly innate. The scienceof.... was well taught at the university of .. . . , where I studied, et. 16-18, and accidentally this be- came serviceable to me when employed as an engineerby .. .. Thefriendshipof .... ma- terially affected my career. My tastes were not largely developed by events occurring after manhood.” (a, b, d, f) (3) “Family tradition derived through my mother’s side. My profession fell in with my natural tastes, such as sketching.” (c, d, e) _ (4) “Innate, I think, as regards certain quali- ties of mind, which led me, under the pressure of circumstances, to direct my attention to certain ’ things in a certain way, namely, (1) independence of judgment; (2) earnestness of purpose ; (3) a practical, clear-headed, common sense, logical way of viewing things.” (c, d) (5) “I cannot say whether they were innate. I was always brought up in a half-scientific, half- literary atmosphere, and was a fair mathema- tician as a boy, as well as a fair classic and 186 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHAP, linguist. My tastes were not determined by after events, but my avocations were rather determined by my scientific habits.” (e) ANALYSIS OF REPLIES. Having given the replies in gross, it now becomes our business to sort their contents under different heads. It would be useless and even ~ embarrassing to make lengthy extracts from them; short abstracts will therefore be given, which the reader may verify whenever he pleases by the help of the reference number, printed in parentheses ( ), which is the same both here and in the original. § A. INNATE TASTES. Instances of a strong taste for science being decidedly innate. I have not included among these the whole of the cases to which an a has been affixed :— Physics and Mathematics.—12 cases out of 20 replies. (1) My tastes are entirely innate ; ee - ae pes ee GH UL | ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 187 they date from childhood. (2) As far back as I can remember, I loved Nature and desired to learn her secrets. (3) Always attracted by men of ability. (4) From an early age | was addicted to mechanical pursuits; then to chemistry. (5) Naturally fond of mechanics and physical science. (6) My tastes were partly natural, partly encouraged. (7) I remember [in- cidents which proved an innate taste| before I could write. (8) I had an innate wish for mis- cellaneous information. (11) Primarily derived [both by inheritance and education] from my father. (16) I always regarded mathematics as the method of obtaining both the most useful and the most harmonious, &c. (17) My taste for mathematics appears innate; as a boy I delighted in sums. (18) An early taste for arithmetic, and in particular for long division sums. Chemistry.—5 cases out of 11. (1) Thoroughly innate. (2) Perhaps wholly innate. (3) I was always observing and inquiring. (4) They date from a very early period, and there was little to 188 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cuar. > = produce them in my early surroundings. (5) — From an early age I had an innate taste for all E branches of science. Geology.—At least 7 out of 8 cases. (1) De-— cidedly innate. (2) A natural taste for observ- — ing and generalizing, developed. (3) A natural taste ; my interest in science began very early. (4) I believe I may say innate to a very con- q siderable extent. (5) I was always fond of natural history. (6) As well asI can recollect, they were innate. (7) I believe the desire for information and habits of observation to be in great measure innate. Zoology.—18 cases out of 24. (1) [Yes] Inherited from my father’s family. (2) Cer- tainly innate. (3) Love of observation and natural history innate. (4) Homology innate. (5) I believe I inherited my general taste for scientific pursuits. (6) Thoroughly innate. bones and shells were attractive to me before 1 ~ could consider them with any apparent profit. (7) Innate love of nature and observation of | natural phenomena. (8) I should say innate; 111. | ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 189 I caught at all scraps of lessons for self-improve- ment. (9) I cannot recollect the time when I was not fond of animals and of knowing all I could learn about them. (11) Love of birds and their study ... I feel that I must have had a taste for science independently of external circumstances. (12) My taste [for science| was entirely innate. (13) As a boy I had a passion for mechanical contrivances ; [my scientific tastes are| altogether innate. (14) I was always fond of construction; my turn for scientific inquiry led me in early life to syste- matise the knowledge of others. (15) Largely inherited from my father. (17) They appear to have been inherited. (18) Nearly in an equal degree the mixed result of a natural bias and education. (19) I should have been an ob- server of animal life under whatever conditions I might have lived. (20) I believe my interest in zoology to have been innate. Botany.—8 cases out of 10. (1) My scien- tific tastes were inborn. (2) As far as the word applies in any case, I should say decidedly in- 190 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [omar. nate. (3) Always fond of* plants. (4) Was always fond of objective and experimental knowledge. (5) As a youth I followed of my 4 own free will chemistry and other sciences. (6) A taste for natural science, especially botany, 4 seems to have been innate. (7) [Scientific 4 tastes apparently innate.] (8) A natural ine { clination. Medical Scvence.—Only 2 cases out of 7. (1) E . Innate in a great degree. (2) I conclude the z tastes were innate, as they showed themselves ; the moment the opportunity for developing them — occurred. Statistics.—8 cases out of 6. (1) Certainly — my scientific tastes appear to me to have been, so to say, innate. (3) Innate, I think. (4) Much inclined to think there was an innate — tendency. Mechanical Science.—At least 2 cases out of ~ 5. (1) If any tastes be innate, mine were; — they date from beyond my recollection. (2) — Decidedly innate. SEQ 2 mores 111.] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 191 INSTANCES OF TASTES BEING DECIDEDLY NOT INNATE. Physics and Mathematics.-—1 case out of 20. (15) I am not aware of any innate taste for . science. Chemistry.—1 case out of 11. (10) I did nothing serious till et. 23. My pursuit of chemistry is entirely due to circumstances occur- ring after manhood. Zoology.—3 cases out of 24. (16) I doubt much their innate character. (22) I do not con- sider them innate, but induced. (24) Not at all innate. Botany.—1 case out of 10. (10) Not innate. Medical_—4 cases out of 7. (3) Not at all especially innate. (4) I cannot perceive that they were innate. (6) I cannot say that I had naturally a turn for any pursuit in particular. (7) Accidentally [directed] to medicine. Rte e i nts ees 2 . ee he * >. ee res ae eres ar og ‘ eh aos as ~ - eo ; ae Skee < 192 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [ar Statistics.—1 at most out of 6. (2) interest in science was due to my having b officially employed in a statistical inquiry. — (It is with much hesitation that I consent to e nter this as a case of “not innate.” | 23 SUMMARY OF RESULTS AS TO INNATE TASTES. Total Deci Decidedly an . A; cases. | innate,” | , Dt |Doubéfal. | Physics and Mathematics . 20 12 1 7 an Chemistry and Mparaleey 11 5 1 5g Geol . : 8 7 0 1 2 Biolo, y—Zoology . Tiree 24 a 3 4a Botany . ’ 10 8 1 1. Medical Science . 7 2 4 1a Geography (not discussed 0 0 0 o8 tus separately) . . . . > . a. Statistical Science. . . . 6 3 1 2 i Mechanical Science : 5 2 0 3 S| 91 56 11 24 | & thes r A mere glance at the table and at the foregoing extracts will probably be enough to convince the reader that a strong and innate taste for science is a prevailing characterist | among scientific men; also that the taste is enduring. This latter peculiarity is by means a necessary consequence of the former; ut. | ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 193 on the contrary, the ruling motives in the disposition of a man usually change as he grows older, the love of inquiry in childhood being superseded by the fierce passions of youth, and these by the ambitions of more mature life. But a special taste for science seems frequently to be so ingrained in the constitution of scientific men, that it asserts itself throughout their whole existence. Ob- viously it must have had great influence im directing their early studies and in ensuring their successful prosecution of them in after years. It would be a curious inquiry to seek the limits of a special taste, that is, the diversity of the objects, any one of which would satisfy it. I think the imdications are clear that the tastes of some of my correspondents are far more special than those of others, and that the latter have checked a tendency to desul- toriness by their strength of will, or have had it checked by the necessities of their position as professors or professional men; or, most of all, by the possession of that strange quality 0 194 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cnar. which the phrenologists call adhesiveness, but which seems to defy analysis. It exists in very different strength in different persons, and i know not where to find a better illustration of its power than in the ordinary case of a man falling in love for the first time, Few lookers- on will doubt that almost any young man is capable of falling in love with any one of at least one-third of the presentable young women — of his race and social position, if they happen ‘ to,see much of one another under favourable ; circumstances and without other distraction ; yet, although the innate taste is of so general — a character, it becomes specialised at once by — the mere act of falling in love. Then the image of one woman takes complete possession — of his thoughts; she is for a considerable period } the only female who has attractions for him, — although he might previously have been equally — attracted by any one of tens of thousands of — her sex. A strong taste bearing remotely on science ; may prove very helpful. The love of collecting, which is a trifling tendency in itself, common to - = ee ee a ee ee SP em ill. | ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 195 children, idiots, and magpies, often leads to the study of the things collected, and is of immense use to a man who wishes to study objects that must be collected in large numbers. I have been told of an astronomer whose primary taste was a love of polished brass instruments and smooth mechanical movements, that nothing sat- isfied this taste so fully as work with telescopes, and from loving the instruments he soon learnt to love the work for which they were used. A taste for careful drawing works well into en- gineering and into systematic botany or zoology. A love of adventure and field sports may be an extremely useful element in the character of a man who follows geology or zoology. As a rough numerical estimate, it seems that 6 out of every 10 men of science were gifted by nature with a strong taste for it; certainly not 1 person in 10, taken at haphazard, possesses such an instinct; therefore I contend that its presence adds five-fold at least, to the chance of seientific success. ‘The converse way of looking at the question gives a similarly large estimate. Certainly one-half of the population have no Oo 2 196 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHaP, care for science, and an extremely small propor- — tion of that half succeed in it. Nay, further, it — appears (though I cannot publish facts in evi- — dence, without violating my rule of avoiding — personal allusions) that of the men who have no natural taste for science and yet succeed in it, many belong to gifted families, and may therefore be accredited with sufficient general abilities to leave their mark on whatever sub- ject it becomes their business to undertake. We may therefore rest assured that the pos- session of a strong special taste is a precious | capital, and that it is a wicked waste of national power to thwart it ruthlessly by a false system of education. But I can give no test which shall distinguish in boyhood between a taste that is destined to endure ee ee a ee ee ee and a passing fancy, further than by remark- — ing that whenever the aptitudes seem heredi-— tary, they deserve peculiar consideration. | Instinctive tastes for science are, generally speaking, not so strongly hereditary as the more : elementary qualities of the body and mind, I have tabulated the replies, and find the propor- ~ I1,] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE, ~ 197 tion to be 1 case of inheritance to 4 that are not inherited from either parent. There is no case in which the correspondent speaks of having inherited a love of science from his mother, though, of course, she may, and probably has, often transmitted it from a grand-parent. I have a curious case among the returns sent to me of a passion for heraldry characterising a ereat-nephew and a great-uncle, the latter of whom had died before the former was born. I have another of an eminent statistician, in whom a love of figures and tabulation was highly characteristic of his grand-parent and is very strongly marked in himself, but was wholly absent in his parent and all other known mem- bers of his small family. There have been numerous and most curious cases of a love of figures and tabulation in my own family, which richly deserve a full description. It was carried to so strange an extravagance by one of its members, a lady now deceased, that | can do no sufficient justice to her peculiarities by speaking in general terms; I ought to give pages of anecdote. oP, —o, 198 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. _[enap. e 4 § B, FORTUNATE ACCIDENTS. We next come to a group of cases which | imply a latent. taste for science, namely, where | a lifelong pursuit of it was first determined by some small accident. The previous ‘indifference or equilibrium of the mind was unstable, a push , was accidentally given, its position was wholly { changed, and it rested in one of stable equili- brium. These ‘cases are not numerous—only ; 10 ‘altogether—but I put them in the second J place on account of their affinity to those in | the first. Physics and Mathematics.—(1 9). [Refer to this. | | | Chemistry.—(1) Possession of a chemical box — when I was a little boy. (3) From lectures I : attended when a boy. (9) To reading by acci- dent a book on chemistry. Geology.—(2) Fossiliferous. rocks near the school where I was. um] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 199 Zoology.—(9) A travelling fellowship. (16) Accidentally reading a book brought me back to scientific studies, previously suspended owing to my profession. (22) Gift, when a boy, of a box of British shells with a book to explain them. Botany.—(10) Accidental receipt of De Can- dolle’s “ Flore frangaise,” when residing in France. Medical Scrence.—None. ; Statistics.—(4) Very clear occasional lectures when a boy. Mechanics.—(2) A particular study at a university, which accidentally became of pro- fessional importance. § C. INDIRECT MOTIVES OR OPPORTUNITIES. This group has also considerable affinity to group (A) and has been alluded to in the re- marks appended to the extracts referring to it. It includes those cases in which the mind was partly, but not largely, deflected from its natural 200 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHaP, > bent; that portion of the innate tendency — j which admitted of being “resolved in the direc- tion” of the scientific pursuit, being satisfied, the — remainder being wasted. These cases are not numerous—only 16 altogether—but I give them the third place for the same reason that I gave group (B) the second. ; Physics and Mathematics.—(5) Possession of — special instruments. (8) Choosing engineering as a profession, but not following it. (19) Love q of yachting (leading to researches on magnetism j of ships). Chemistry.—(6) The obtaining of correct and — accurate results in chemical analysis gave me : great satisfaction. Geology.—(1) Interest in discoveries made in of eee (3) A very early love of experiment — and chemistry. (6) Should have followed che- ; mistry and physics, but circumstances... . gave opportunities for geology. Zoology.—(5) My choosing... . for special investigation was due to a positive fascination — m1. ] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 201 from the obscurity of the subject. (9) My father’s and brother’s pursuit of field sports, and thence indirectly to natural history. (13) An early passion for mechanism, which led me to take to physiology and anatomy, as the engineering side of my profession. (15) My taste for biology began with keeping insects. (24)... . subsequently to the desire to in- vestigate certain questions bearing on medicine. Botany.—None. Medical Science.—(3) Connection of hospital and medical school with the place of his resi- dence. (4) Love of facts and the impression that good surgery is a great fact. Statistics —None. Mechanics—(3) Profession fell in with natural tastes, such as sketching. (4) Innate faculties, serviceable to profession under the pressure of circumstances, 202 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [CHAP. ” § D. PROFESSIONAL DUTIES. _ The fourth group comprises instances in which professional duty was a principal cause of the interest first felt in scientific pursuits, or else of the energies being concentrated upon some branch of science towards which no special in- clination had previously been exhibited. Two or three, of the 21 cases which I shall quote, may perhaps be thought doubtful examples and more appropriate to the preceding eroup; but after all possible deductions ‘have been made, there will remain ample evidence of the magnitude of the influence we are considering. A wise adminis- trator, desirous, even at some cost, of promoting original investigation, would establish many professional offices of a scientific character, having responsible duties of a prominent kind attached to them. They would create much new interest in science, and would compel those who held them, to work steadily and to a purpose in scientific harness. Physics and Mathematics.—(4) Had never > i —————————EEEee mu.) | ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. —__.203 attended specially to physics till appointed pro- fessor of natural philosophy. This induced me to give up chemistry, and to devote myself definitively to physics. (9) Solitary observing for years [as director of an observatory]. (13) Professional duties and civil engineering. . . . ; official exploration of .... (14) Largely deter- mined by service in north polar and equatorial expeditions. (15) My interest in astronomy was very small indeed, until I was appointed [to the directorship of an observatory |. Chemistry.—(8) The university inviting me to fill the chair of ... , gave my work its bent. Geology.—None. Zoology.—(1) Largely determined by being appointed .... (10) Partly by my selection of medicine as a profession, (13) My appoint- ment to a surveying ship made me a comparative anatomist ...., that to... . forced me to paleontology. (17) First began to concentrate energies to one branch, when appointed... . (18) [My scientific tastes] were determined by 204 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHapP. professional study. (23) To ths profession of medicine [in physiology, anatomy and... .]| (24) Subsequently to my desire to investigate certain subjects bearing on [my profession of } medicine. Botany.—(7) Never took up botany to any extent till the professorship was vacant. [There is some conflict of testimony here. | Medical Science.—(1) Partly to my profession. (2) I selected the medical profession because it was that of my father; this choice led me to scientific pursuits. (8) I did not follow my own branch from any special liking—indeed, I rather disliked it, but it was necessary to earn a livelihood and to follow some branch. (6) My addiction to medicine was purely the result of accident: I never gave a thought to physic as a subject of study, until I was 27 years old. (7) Accidental to medicine. Statistics—(2) Due to official employment when young, in a very important statistical inquiry. u1.] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 205 Mechanics.—(2) The science of .... , which I had learnt accidentally, became serviceable to me when employed as an engineer. (3) My bal rs ~ i c profession fell in with my natural tastes. (4) Pressure of circumstances. § E. ENCOURAGEMENT AT HOME. Nearly one-third ‘of the scientific men have expressed themselves indebted to encouragement ; at home. They received it in various ways ; sometimes the influence of the parent was strong and direct, as “their origin was due beyond ? all doubt to my father’s influence ;” sometimes it was strong but general, as “1 was in a general atmosphere of scientific thinking and discus- ) sion ;” sometimes it went no further than indulgence, as “permission to carry on little experiments at home in a room set apart for the purpose.” Under each and all of these shapes it was truly welcome, and its effective- ness may be in some measure estimated by the vastly smaller number of cases in which success 206 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. _{cuar. was obtained in direct spmsiian to family influences. | Scientific studies in boyhood are apt to meet with scant favour at home ; they deal too much in abstractions on the one hand, and sensible messes and mischief to furniture and clothes on the other. They lead to no clearly lucrative purpose, and occupy time which might be apparently better bestowed. These hindrances were far more seriously felt when the men on my list were young, when apparatus was hardly to be procured, and when scientific work was exceptional. I ascribe many of the cases of encouragement to the existence of an hereditary link; that is to say, the son had inherited scientific tastes, and was encouraged by the ) parent from whom he had inherited them, and who naturally sympathized with him. Attention should be given to the relatively small encouragement received from the mother. I have sorted the extracts so as to permit the comparison to be easily made. The female mind has special excellencies of a high order, and the value of its influence in various ways ; 111. | ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 207 is one that I can never consent to underrate ; but that influence is towards enthusiasm and love (as distinguished from philanthropy), not towards calm judgment, nor, inclusively, towards science. In many respects the character of scientific men is strongly anti-feminine ; their mind is directed to facts and abstract theories, and not to persons or human interests. The man of science is deficient in the purely emo- tional element, and in the desire to influence the beliefs of others. Thus I find that 2 out of every 10 do not care for politics at all; they are devoid of partisanship. They school a naturally equable and independent mind to a still more complete subordination to their judgment. In many respects they have little sympathy with female ways of thought. It is a curious proof of this, that in the very numerous answers which have reference to parental influence, that of the father is quoted three times as often as that of the mother. It would not have been the case, judging from inquiries I elsewhere made, if I had been discussing the antecedents of literary 208 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. (crap. 7 men, commanders, or statesmen, or, still more, of divines. Physics and Mathematics.—(10) The origin of my interest in .... is mainly due to my father’s knowledge of geology, navigation, and engineering. (11) Primarily derived [both by education and inheritance] from my father. Chemistry.—(8) Permission to carry on little experiments at home, in a room set apart for the purpose. .... Subsequently residing abroad and my mother making a home for me there. (4) I was taught at home with my brothers; we had always the example of industry, and were encouraged to think for ourselves. (8) My father gave me [some books on chemistry, and| J owe to my mother a child’s curiosity and afterward a man’s reverence for scientific truth. (11) My tastes ‘received no encourage- t ment whatever from relations, my mother 3 excepted. Geology.—(1) My father and an aunt collected specimens. (4) I was indebted in a high degree ee ee 111. ] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 209 to collections made by my father and mother. (7) I was encouraged by the example of an elder brother. Zoology.—(9) (The example of my father and elder brothers, who were all pretty firm to field sports, was also followed by me, and from field sports to field natural history is but a step). (15) Largely inherited from my father. I was in a general atmosphere of scientific thinking and discussion. (21) I may have derived | ? in- herited| the tendency from my mother; I belonged to an industrious family, and saw every one working. (1) | Traditionally derived, and| inherited from my father’s family [7.e. from father, grandfather, &c.| (6) My father had no scientific knowledge, nevertheless he encouraged me. (7) I trace it to the love of truth and of mental cultivation in my father, and to his encouragement of this love in his children. (11) That I inherited a strong love of nature from my father is certain, who was devoted to horticulture and very fond of birds. (16) Their origin was due, beyond all doubt, to my P 210 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. — [CHAP, a father’s influence. (17) My “interest in science | arose from the example of my father, and — . &. (19) I trace it to the earliest im- pressions of my childhood, all of which are q connected. with my father and the animals — he brought me as pets, (23) To my father's — example (in science). (4) Decidedly to my — mother’s observations in our childhood rambles. (8) My soon-developed enthusiasm must have — been derived from my mother’s family. Botany.—(2) A little encouragement at home. — (6) The love of botany was instilled into me 7 in very early youth by my father. (8) To my ~ father’s encouragement of a natural inclination. (10) And to encouragement from my mother. Medical Science.—(1) [Partly] to my mother’s — mental activity and love of collecting and — arranging, and to my father’s constant en- — couragement of my pursuit. Statistics.— (5) [Partly] acquired from inter- 7 course with my father and.... a Mechanics.—(5) I was always brought up all Ut] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 211 in a half scientific, half literary atmosphere. (3) Family tradition derived through my mother’s side. T'wo cases are mentioned in which the origin of the scientific tastes was partly due to the active assistance of the wife.. One of these is Botany (5), and the other I have ventured to suppress, as it did not appear to me sufficiently decided. § F. THE INFLUENCE AND ENCOURAGEMENT OF FRIENDS. This group has much in common with that of the indirect influences already classed under sroup ¢; it includes cases where a fortuitous acquaintance has been the means of deciding a eareer, probably by revealing a latent taste, or showing how some obstacle in the way of in- dulging it could easily be removed. There is a wide interval, often very difficult to get over, between the study of a subject out of books and P 2 212 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHAP, — . the practical investigation of it for oneself. At this point of a man’s mental progress the help of a friend may be of immense assistance ; he | may give elementary hints which will remove formidable difficulties to a beginner, who is utterly unused to experiment. It is told, I think, of a scholar, that he laboured for succes- : | sive days to make with his own hands in his own chambers a plum-pudding according to a time-honoured family recipe, but he produced — nothing except thick pastes or stirabouts of — different degrees of lumpiness, revolting to the . sight. At length he confided his difficulties to — a lady, who explained that in making plum- — puddings it was a matter of course, and therefore not spoken of in the recipe, to put the ingre- dients into a bag before beginning to boil them. — The example of a friend encourages a young — man to overcome his diffidence and to firmly occupy any position that he knows by his own — judgment to be true. Perhaps the greatest help j of all is the consciousness of strength which is : given by co-operation on not very unequal terms : with a veteran in performance and reputation, , i Ul. ] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 213 Out of the 91 cases, 18 speak gratefully of the influence and encouragement of friends. Physics and Mathematics—(3) .... I was both his young friend and assistant for 3 aR Dye mae ONE years. He imbued me with his respect for science,. . . . , earnestness, and accuracy. (6) Partly encouraged by an eminent friend. (138) Picked up an unsystematic education [in science] in the company of .... (16) I was taken to see... . [which was the origin of my experi- mentalising |. (17) I trace it to my acquaintance GR A with. ... and to going abroad with him. (19) The intimacy of his father with. . .. gave a bias towards magnetism. Chemistry.—(2) My taste for zoology arose through friendship with... . Geology—(2) The surgeon to whom I was articled -fostered my tastes. (4) To mining officers in Germany ; to conversations with’. ... and ...., and acquaintance of .... (5) Through the acquaintance of. . . . , to the par- ticular branch [of geology, that I have pursued ]. 214 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cmap, Zoology.—(3) The help of .... has aided me immensely, (10) I was much under the in- fluence of a remarkable man, a most accomplished — naturalist. (23) The example of many men E whom I knew when I was young, proved a great stimulus and incentive. (24) I can trace it dis- tinctly to my intercourse with certain professors. 4 - Botany.—(5) . . . . was subsequently en-— couraged by [eminent botanists]. (9) I was — thrown into the society of a gentleman who took j much interest in botany. (10) They were de- — termined afterwards by .... and the friend- ship and encouragement of the four greatest — British botanists of the day. Medical Science.—(1) [Partly] to the friend- 9 ship of three eminent botanists. (7) Accidentally [directed] to medicine by associating with a medical friend in a superficial study of botany. Statistics.—(5) [Partly] from intercourse with | my father and certain of his friends. Mechanical. Science.—(2) The friendship of ) . materially influenced my career. ; ut] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 215 § G. INFLUENCE AND ENCOURAGEMENT OF TUTORS, This group of 13 cases refers to the influence and encouragement of masters, tutors and pro- fessors. It is a small one; not because persons in those positions are incapable of exerting much salutary influence, but because the scientific men on my list seldom had the advantage of receiving congenial instruction. This is clearly proved by a comparison of the replies referring to Scotch and to English tuition. In Scotland the uni- versity programme and the general method of teaching is much more suited to men of a scien- tific bent of mind than those in England ; consequently the influence of tutors has been testified to far more abundantly by those men on my list who have been educated in Scotland than by the rest. The proportions are striking and instructive, I find that about one-sixth of those from whom I have received returns have studied in Scotland; hence, if professorial in- fluences had been equally efficacious on both 216 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE, [cHar. . | sides of the Tweed, there would have been 5 — times as many expressions of gratitude to En- glish teachers as to Scotch. But the facts show that no less than 8 out of the 13 cases refer to teachers in Scotland, 1 to a Scotch teacher settled in England, and only 4 to English professors. It would have been (8 x 5 =) 40 and not 4, if the English education had been as profitable to science as the Scotch. I willingly admit that the smallness of the numbers, namely, only 13 cases, renders precise figures open to question; however, the superiority of the Scotch system is supported by other evidence which I shall speak of in the chapter on education. Physics and Mathematics.—(7) I believe the origin was when I attended the natural philosophy classes at... . (10) Tastes con- firmed _by lectures, and especially by the encouragement’ of [certain professors]. (20) Interest in mathematics due to the encourage- ment of ...., and influence of [professors at a university |. Se 1 eee -.,lhltC eee ee are wth tps aici ee — " = = 111. ] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 217 Chemistry.—(7) Chiefly to being sent as a pupil to an eminent man of science. Geology—(5) Lectures by .... Zoology—(5) My scientific tastes were largely promoted by the attractive teaching of . . +» [various professors]. (17) And to being the assistant and close companion of .... (24) I can trace it [in part] distinctly to my intercourse with certain professors. . Botany.—(4) I date my first efforts of any consequence from an early intimacy with. ..., whose pupil and assistant I] was; the necessity of accurate work then dawned upon me. (6) The companionship of . . . . incited me to pro- secute botany with vigour; I was one of his best pupils, and travelled with him. Medical Science.—(4) Subsequently by the approval of teachers, having been selected chief- assistant. Statistics.—(4) Very clear occasional lectures, when a boy, on moral and economical subjects ; 218 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHar, : the tastes were afterwards developed by a good education. (6) Professor... .’s lectures were the origin of my interest in geology [It was the earliest: scientific pursuit of this correspondent]. Mechanical Scrence.—None. § H. TRAVEL IN DISTANT PARTS. ————— a ee There are only 8 cases in this group, namely, ——“ = those in which the aspects of nature under new conditions have developed a love for science. Few men of scientific training have had op- portunities of distant travel, but on those few their action has been very strong, especially as regards biologists and physicists. I say nothing here in respect to mere geographers, and quote none of their replies, because its importance to them requires neither proof nor comment. Men isa Ml mamaia 4 are too apt to accept as an axiomatic law, not capable of further explanation, whatever they see recurring day after day without fail. So the dog in the back yard looks on the daily arrival of the postman, butcher, and baker as so many 111. | ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 219 elementary phenomena, not: to-be barked at or wondered about. Travel in distant countries, by unsettling these quasi-axiomatic ideas, restores to the educated man the freshness of childhood in observing new things and in seeking reasons for all he sees. I believe that a handsome endowment of travelling fellowships, thoroughly well paid, with extra allowance for any special work allotted to their holders, given only to young men of high qualifications, and lasting for at least 5 years, would be money well bestowed in the furtherance of science. Physics and Mathematics.—(3) To some ex- tent my tastes were determined by events after manhood, because for 10 years I held positions of great responsibility [in distant parts of the world], but I consider they were formed in my youth. (9) Ocean voyaging in the beginning of life ; solitary observing for years in a country verging on a desert, under southern skies. (13) The distinct origin... . was the wonderful effect produced on me by the aspects of nature, 220 _ ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. _ [cuar. as seen in the...., tay with what I - may call the accident of having been allowed to explore part of it in an official capacity. (14) Largely determined by my service in north polar and equatorial expeditions. Chemistry.—None. Geology.—(7) Subsequently much influenced by being thrown, at set. 19, on my own judg- ment and resources in founding a mining colony in the backwoods of . . . . and carrying it out quite alone. Zoology.—(2) Strongly confirmed and directed by the voyage in the.... (13) My appoint- ment to the surveying ship.... made me a comparative anatomist, by affording opportuni- ties for the investigation of the structure of the lower animals. Botany.—(5) They were directed to botany purely through accidental circumstances | which led to a prolonged residence in an imperfectly civilized country |. a . } é Ms . ul. ] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 221 § Z. UNCLASSED RESIDUUM. We now come to the final group, namely, those influences which cannot be sorted into any of the 8 groups with definite titles, which we have already examined. At the outset I spoke of these unclassed conditions as forming a class by themselves, of no great importance, and which might be indefinitely reduced in pro- portion as we chose to pursue our analysis, | estimate that the 91 replies which I have re- ceived and analysed assign a total of 191 causes. It now appears that no less than 188 of these fall into one or other of 8 definite groups, and that there remain only 3 on our hands for the unclassed residuum. Even these are apparently due to aggregates of conditions, the more im- portant of which would probably find their place among the 8 groups, leaving a still minuter residue. We may lightly dismiss them as of inappreciably small importance in our present inquiry. Chemistry. — (10) Entirely due to circum- 222 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [omar. ~ stances after manhood, and in direct opposition to family influences. (11) To opportunity at [a foreign university |. Geology.—(8) The tastes developed oradually after manhood. SUMMARY. If we take a general survey of our national stock, of capabilities and their produce, we see that the larger part is directed to gain daily bread and necessary luxuries, and to keep the great social machine in steady work. The sur- plus is considerable, and may be disposed of in various ways. Let us now put ourselves in the ‘position of advocates of science solely, and con- sider from that point of view how the surplus capabilities of the nation might be diverted to its furtherance. How can the tastes of men be most powerfully acted upon, to affect them towards science ? | The large category (A) of innate tastes is practically beyond our immediate influence; but ut. ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 223 though we cannot increase the national store, we need not waste it, as we do now. Every in- stance in which a man having an aptitude to succeed in science, is tempted by circumstances which might be controlled, to occupy himself with subjects of less national value, is a public calamity. Aptitudes and tastes for occupations which enrich the thoughts and productive powers of man are as much articles of national wealth as coal and iron, and their waste is as repre- hensible. Educational monopolies which offer numerous and great prizes for work of other descriptions, have caused enormous waste of scientific ability, by imducing those who might have succeeded in science, to spend their energies with small effect on uncongenial occupations. When a pursuit is instinctive and the will is untaxed, an immense amount of work may be accomplished with ease, Witness, to take an extreme case, the sustained action of the wholly involuntary muscles. The heart does its work unceasingly, from birth to death; and it is no light work, but such as the arm, working a pump-handle, would soon weary of maintaining ; 224 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cHAP, or again, think of the migratory flight of birds, in obedience to an instinct; or of the muscular force, astonishing both in magnitude and en- durance, exhibited by lunatics, who have some real though morbid passion which goads them to exercise it. We must therefore learn to re- spect innate tastes, which directly, as in A, or indirectly, as in C, serve the cause of science. As regards B, the fortunate accidents, we can multiply opportunities. There is oreat hope in respect to D, the professional influences. It is clear to all who have knowledge of the scope of modern science, that there exists an immense deal of national work which has to be performed, and which none but men of scientific culture are qualified to undertake. Scientific superintendence is required for all kinds of technical education, for statistical investigations of innumerable kinds, and deductions from them ; for sanitary administration in the broadest sense ; for agriculture, mining, industrial occupations, war, engineering. There is everywhere a de- mand for scientific assessors, who shall discover how to economise effort and find out new pro- ete Re ; _.* i 3 TI. ] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 225 cesses and fruitful principles. Professional duties generally, ought to be more closely bound up with strictly scientific work than they are at present; and this requirement would tend to foster scientific tastes in minds which had little inborn tendency that way. In respect to @, the influence and encouragement of tutors, seeing how far Scotland has surpassed England in the attractiveness of her mode of teaching, which is by professorial lectures rather than by class- work, it is clear that the English system admits of being greatly improved, and the in- fluence of her teachers proportionately increased, in turning the minds of youths to science. Lastly, as regards u, travel in distant lands, its indirect value deserves far more than the moderate sums assigned to its prosecution, in the way of starved travelling fellowships and rare voyages of surveying ships. To sum up in a few words: it seems to me that the interpretation to be put on the replies we have now been considering, is that a love of science might be largely extended by fostering, and not thwarting, innate tendencies, by the Q 226 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. — [ CHAP. n extension of scientific professional appointments and professorships, by assimilating in some cases the English system of teaching to that of the Scotch, and by creating travelling and other fellowships which shall enable their holders to view nature in various aspects, and to work with foreigners whose habits of thought are fruitful in: themselves, but of a different kind to our own. I will take this opportunity of drawing at- tention to what appears to me one of the greatest of desiderata of this kind in the pre- sent day, namely, the establishment of medical fellowships amply sufficient to enable the best youths, who intend to follow medicine as a profession, to spend their early manhood in prosecuting independent medical researches. I appeal to capitalists, who know not what use, free from abuse, to make of their surplus wealth, to consider this want. They might greatly im- prove the practical skill of the English medical profession by affording opportunities of pro- longed study. They might perhaps themselves, reap some part of the benefit of it. A young Meet) \ ingenious man may not be found who has ideas and much shrewdness, but is crotchety and im- practicable. He wants energy and business habits, so he never rises. Many of these men brood over subjects like perpetual motion: their peculiarities are well illustrated in De Morgan’s Book of Paradoxes. Again we frequently meet persons of a stamp that justifies the old- fashioned caricature of scientific men, who are absorbed in some petty investigation, utterly deficient in business habits, and noted for ab- sence of mind. Even idiots have often strongly quasi-scientific tastes, as love for simple me- chanism, or objects of natural history ; and they have, as already remarked, a pleasure in collect- ing. Madmen have often persistency, as is shown by their brooding on a single topic. We all of us must have met with curious cases of failures, where a mind and disposition that pro- mise much for success, never achieve it. It may be that some’ mental screw is loose, or there is some irreparable weakness of judgment, or some untimely irresolution or rashness; any fault of this kind is sufficient to mar a man’s —— a 111.] ORIGIN OF TASTE FOR SCIENCE. 233 chances when competition is keen. To obtain the highest order of success, two things are wanted ; first, the qualities of the man must — elther be good all round, or else he must be so circumstanced as to be able, when the need arises, to supplement his deficiencies by ex- traneous help; secondly, he must have some very useful qualities highly developed. It is said that “‘ genius” is required for high success, and there is much talk about what genius is, and on the failures of men of genius, while some persons go so far as to doubt the existence of genius as a separate quality. It appears to me, that what is generally meant by genius, when the word is used in a special sense, is the automatic activity of the mind, as distin- guished from the effort of the will. In a man of genius, the ideas come as by inspiration ; in other words, his character is enthusiastic, his mental associations are rapid, numerous and firm, his imagination is vivid, and he is driven rather than drives himself. All men have some genius; they are all apt, under excitement, to show flashes of unusual enthusiasm, and to ex- 234 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cH. 113, > perience swift and strange associations of ideas ; in dreams, all men commonly exhibit more vivid powers of imagination than are possessed by the greatest artists when awake. Sober, plodding will is quite another quality, and its over-exercise exhausts the more sprightly func- tions of the mind, as is expressed in the proverb, “too much work makes a dull boy.” But no man is likely to achieve very high success in whom the automatic power of the mind, or genius in its special sense, and a sober will, are not well developed and fairly balanced. el ie he Ee ee i a CHAPTER IV. EDUCATION, Preliminary—Education praised throughout or nearly so— Merits in Education—Merits and demerits balanced— Demerits—Summary—Conclusion. I now pass on to the education which the scientific men had in their youth, in the hope that my results may give assistance to those who are endeavouring to frame systems of education suitable to the wants of the day. What I have to say is very partial; it refers solely to the opinions the scientifie men entertain of the merits and faults of their own several educa- tions in bygone days. Their views are remark- ably unanimous, considering the very different branches of inquiry they are interested in, and the great dissimilarities in their education. 236 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [CHAP, 7. One-third of those who sent replies have been educated at Oxford or Cambridge, one-third at Scotch, Irish, or London universities, and the remaining third at no university at all. I am totally unable to decide which of the three groups occupies the highest scientific position : they seem to me very much alike in this respect. The questions to which the following -replies were given, were as follows :—“ Was your edu- cation especially conducive to, or restrictive of, habits of observation?” “Was your education eminently conducive to health or the reverse ?” “What do you consider to have been peculiar merits in your education?” “What were the chief omissions in it, and what faults of com- mission can you indicate?” I also asked for information concerning the places of education, — both schools and colleges, and as regards home and self-instruction. The answers were, in some cases, very interesting from their minute elabo- ration, but I am, of course, restricted on this occasion to a simple treatment of them. I cannot now paint with delicate tints, but must A “ ——— ae | v.] EDUCATION. , 237 content myself with broad lights and shades, The following answers are extracts, and, in some few cases, abstracts; they convey the general © tone of the several replies as nearly as possible. The groups under which I have sorted them are these :— Merits :— ,, Education praised throughout, or nearly so. . 10 replies - Variety of subjects .10 ,, a A little science at school 3 __,, a Simple things well taught 3 __,, 2 Liberty and leisure behest ta . Home teaching and en- couragement . Sg » scr Merits and demerits balanced NES Demerits :— » Narrow education : PSS » Want of system and bad teaching . , : EO disk » Unclassed $ . Stet Pk Total . , : Be 238 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [CHAP. - There are a few cases in which an answer, already given in combination, has been extracted and repeated. MERITS : EDUCATION PRAISED THROUGHOUT, OR NEARLY SO—TEN CASES. (1) “ Was admirably taught, zt. 13-164, to reason, use my own mind, and depend on myself. Was taught to acquire large masses of informa- tion by reading. There was a little tendency to a vagrant style of reading, but this was pro- bably neutralised by other influences.” (2) “Well taught in classics and mathematics. If possible my education should have afforded facilities for the study of the science of observa- tion, but I doubt the practicability of this at school. While a schoolboy I taught myself botany, chemistry, &c, under great dis- advantages.” (3) “Careful and good early education at home by my mother and father; then rather strict training by my father and by my first Iv.] EDUCATION. 239 _ schoolmaster. Being carefully looked after by my father and expected to do my best.” (4) “My education was well balanced; it was general and of a very complete kind, in- cluding chemistry, botany, logic and _ political economy; but 3 years (et. 12-15) spent in learning the Latin and Greek grammars were a blank waste of time.” (5) “Education included French, German, logic, natural philosophy, chemistry, besides mathematics. J lived in a house where I saw many people whose interests were of various kinds, and I went to a day-school where I mixed with the boys only when they were fresh and active. Thus I had two outer worlds to balance against each other. On the whole, I had, I think, the greatest degree of freedom possible to a boy.” (6) “Was at school till set. 16, and with a tutor in Germany for 6 months; after then, technical training and teaching. The education was conducive both to observation and health. 240 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [cnar. _ - © Variety of subjects and attention to details. A combination of home and school education, my father having been head master of the school.” (7) “ My father being a schoolmaster, I was at some sort of school work nearly all my life, but from the age of 12 I was occupied more in teaching than in learning. My education in- cluded the various subjects usually taught in English schools, with something of astronomy, pneumatics, electricity, and mechanics. I learnt much in conversation with my father, which chiefly took an instructive form. Was led to think and speak freely, also to engage frequently in domestic discussions on questions of general policy. I had also early access to tools and materials.” : (8) “I was fortunate in obtaining at school (zt. 8-16) an insight into the phenomena of nature, a subject entirely ignored at that time in almost all schools. My peculiar bent for experiment was encouraged at home by my mother, and there were peculiar merits in my ‘ q Iv.] : EDUCATION. 241 training under Professors. ... at...., and 33 especially in Germany, under... . (9) “The steadiness with which I was taught by one eccentric schoolmaster reading and ac- curate spelling, clear, neat, and intelligible writing, and quick and accurate computation by all the primary rules of arithmetic. Faults in these several branches were never overlooked, and all competition was for excellence in each ; Latin and French were evidently thrown in to please parents. Going to sea, at the age of 13, I really think I started with the best education I could have had. Compared with my youthful messmates, some of whom had passed through public schools, I was far their superior in writing (I soon acquired chart-drawing and sketching from nature), and in calculation of the day’s work, and in astronomical observa- tions,” 242 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. [omar, — — ( MERITS IN. EDUCATION: VARIETY OF SUBJECTS —NINE REPLIES. (1) “Not tied down to old courses of classics and mathematies.” (2) “My master (et. 15-17) was a man of 4 scientific and generally liberal turn of mind.” (3) “ Sufficient groundwork in many subjects — q to avoid error.” (4) “Early introduced to many subjects of interest.” (5) “A well-balanced education [including chemistry, botany, logic, and political economy|].” (6) “A variety of subjects and attention to details. Coming in contact with persons of q every rank [in Scotland], and sitting on the same form with the sons of tradesmen and — ploughmen, as well as of gentlemen.” (7 & 8) Two cases; both [being Bnglshmen) praise Scotch system of education. SY PO ak ee Se 1v.] EDUCATION. 243 (9) “Living in a house where there were many interests, and going thence to a day-school, where there were other and different ones.” MERITS IN EDUCATION: A LITTLE SCIENCE AT SCHOOL—-THREE REPLIES. (1) “Only one good thing; that was object lessons, though given badly and only for a short time.” (2) “All the merits [of my schooling] I attribute to a _ little elementary physics and chemistry, taught me between the ages of 7 and 13.” (3) “Science taught me at school between the ages of 11 and 16.” MERITS IN EDUCATION: SIMPLE THINGS WELL TAUGHT—THREE REPLIES. (1) “Clear, neat, and intelligible writing, ac- curate spelling, and simple computation.” (2) “Was very well grounded in arithmetic at school.” ENGLISH MEN OF SOzRNCE. | ee, ts ele Forced accuracy of delineation at hol ni eet. 14-16.” MERITS IN EDUCATION : LIBERTY AND LEIS vn _——-THREE REPLIES. | os 3 (1) “Unusual ayaree of freedom.” © 4 (2) “Freedom to follow my own inclinations and choose my own se aisinn of study, or the | 4 reverse,’ 4g : CM (3) “The great proportion of time left free to _ do as I liked, unwatched and uncontrolled.” = (3 “ .T > MERITS IN EDUCATION: HOME TEACHING AND HOME ENCOURAGEMENT—EIGHT REPLIES. _ (1) “Encouragement by my mother.” (2) ‘ Encouragement by my father.” (3) “Carefully looked after by my father andl expected to do my best.” ; 4 (4) (See (7), in “ Education praised through- out or nearly so.”) _ Iv.] EDUCATION. 245 (5) “During 1 year (et. 17) I resided and studied with my uncle [by marriage] and learnt there more of the dead languages than in all my school time.” _ (6) “My private education at home was much the more valuable.” (7) ‘Home and self-education developed my observing faculties,” (8) ‘Pretty much self-taught, but encouraged to use my eyes, wits, and independent thought.” MERITS AND DEMERITS IN EDUCATION BALANCED —FOUR REPLIES. (1) “ Left to myself, and I pursued a discur- sive line. As compared with ordinary schools, I think self-teaching has many advantages for boys of active minds; but intelligent teaching and insisting on accuracy and completeness would have produced a much more efficient 22 man. (2) ‘The merits of my education consisted in the great number of studies connected with 246 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. — [onar nature; but there was a want of system and of | 1 consecutive study.” an (3) “The demerit of my education was thes . want of being thoroughly grounded; this gave ; q me great trouble, but made me think for myself; often an advantage to me.” (4) “No sound instruction; the education was too general and desultory, but it gave wide interest.” DEMERITS: NARROW £EDOCATION—THIRTY-TWO CASES. (1) “No mathematics nor modern languages, nor any habits of observation or reasoning.” (2) “Enormous time devoted to Latin and Greek, with which languages I am _ not conversant.” (3) “Omission of almost everything useful and good, except being taught to read. Latin! — Latin! Latin!” | (4) “Latin through Latin—nonsense verses.” ee ee : ’ . y J 1v.] EDUCATION. 247 (5) “ Limitation of subjects “practically to classics,” (6) “ Absence of any scientific training; too much confined to classics.” (7) “Omission of mathematics, German, and drawing.” (8) “Latin and Greek were more insisted on than modern languages.” (9) “In an otherwise well-balanced education, 3 years, zt. 12-15, at a private school were spent on Latin and Greek grammar—a_ blank waste of time.” (10) “‘ School work directed to the cultivation of literary tastes only, and therefore not adapted to a variety of intellects.” (11) “Elements of natural science omitted ; nothing taught of the nature of the world around us.” (12) “Not taught mathematics, nor any na- tural science, to which I could have taken con amore.” ct 3) is « Absence of instraction in ‘the a C coisas act (14) “Want of the modern a and of chemistry.” (15) “Want of ioeat dae mathemati cal. training.” (16) “Want of training in the habits of observation.” | (17) “Neglect of mathematics; too much reliance on mere work of memory. Mental — training overlooked in the mere acquisition of routine.” (18) “I could now wish that I had om 7 through at the university a good course of che- | mistry and physics, as a preparation for the other | branches; but the main obstacle was lack of time.” Si ihe (19) “Want of education of faculties of ob- 4 servation ; want of mathematics, and of modern languages.” : | Pas 4 1v.] EDUCATION. 219 ~ (20) “Not allowing my mind to follow its natural bias.” (21) “Neglect of many subjects for the at- tainment of one or two; not pushing mathe- matics to a useful end.” (22) * Not enough liberty; put back by too much grounding at Cambridge.” (23) “At school the classical education, viz., construing, parsing and learning grammatical rules, was not to my taste. At Oxford I wasted much time, having little sympathy with the university pursuits and habits.” (24) ‘‘ Having so exclusively devoted myself to mathematics at Cambridge.” (25) “The classical teaching was said to be good, but I did not assimilate it. Perhaps my mental peculiarities and my ‘special inaptitude to commit words to memory would have ren- dered most education, such as it was when I was a boy, ineffectual for much good. The main defect for me certainly was that precise verbal 250 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIEN: CE. (CHAP, memory was the test of all knowledge. No doubt, in some things, such as languages, pre- cise knowledge of words is essential, and there- fore I refer to my own special defect in saymg this.” . (26) ‘* My school work was too predominantly classical, and nearly everything was taught on authority.’ (27) “ Persistence in giving me no holiday, and overstraining my memory when I was very young.” (28) “My principal regret is that I was un- able to pursue the study of mathematics.” (29) “ Mathematies were not pushed far enough ; natural science was left to the boys themselves.” (30) “My boyhood was utterly wasted, and the efforts of my manhood have not sufficed, and never will suffice, to repair the loss.” (31) “Omission of all subjects excepting the classics, but particularly [faulty] in the want of “intellectual training.” “Iv, ] EDUCATION. 251 (32) [A military man.] “The authority of a military education is prejudicial to the develop- ment of thought and education in matters of opinion.” DEMERITS IN EDUCATION: WANT OF SYSTEM AND BAD TEACHING—-TEN CASES. (1) “ Want of system.” (2) “Want of system.” (3) “ Want of system.” (4) “ Want of system; absence of necessary control,” (5) “Bad early masters; neglect at public school.” (6) “ Essentially defective; no competition nor supervision.” (7) “The very mistaken way in which lan-. guages, as it now seems to me, especially Latin and Greek, were taught.” ENGLISH MEN OF ScEENCE, (8) “Too much for memory ; nothing sac ean pes scott at (9) “Want of thoroughness in teaching.” 3 (10) “Careless and superficial reading.” a . DEMERITS IN EDUCATION: CASES. (1) “Brought up in an idle class, and never 4 realised the necessity of labour i in aequirement.” ae ‘ fer j ~ (2) “Too much cramming for examinations. — : Too much isolated, being the es son and educated at home.” | 4 (3) “Too great changes in system, having — | been educated at 5 universities (3 of which were Scotch, 1 esha and 1 in Germany).” a (4) “Being brought up at home; was per- haps too much shut out from the company of other boys.” 1v.] EDUCATION. | 253 SUMMARY. — The scientific men on my list have very generally ascribed high merits to a varied edu- cation. They say, as we have just seen :— “Not tied down to old courses of classics and mathematics.’—“ Sufficient groundwork in many subjects to avoid error.’—“ A well-balanced education, including chemistry, botany, logic, and political economy.”— Coming in contact with persons of every rank, and sitting in the same form [in a Scotch school] with the sons of tradesmen and ploughmen, as well as gentle- men.” In contrast to this, others who speak of the faults of their education, say :—‘“! No mathe- matics, nor modern languages, nor any habits of observation or reasoning.”—‘“‘ Enormous time devoted to Latin and Greek, with which lan- guages I am not conversant.”—‘“ In an other- wise well-balanced education, three years were spent on Latin and Greek grammar—a blank waste of time.”—‘ Neglect of many subjects for. the attainment of one or two; not pushing 254 ENGLISH MEN OF OCR CE, (crap. mathematics to a useful end.” Evidence such as this, fully establishes the advantage of a variety of study. One group of men speak grate- fully because they had it, and another speak reoretfully because they had it not. I find none who had a reasonable variety who disapproved of it, none who had a purely old-fashioned edu- cation who were satisfied with it. The scientific men who came from the large public schools usually did nothing when there; they could not assimilate the subjects taught, and have abused the old system heartily. There are several serious complaints about superficial and bad teaching which I need not quote afresh. Overteaching is thoroughly objected to; thus, in speaking of merits of education, I find :— ‘Freedom to follow my own inclinations, and to choose my own subjects of study, or the reverse.” —“The great proportion of time left free to do as I liked, unwatched and uncontrolled.”— “Unusual degree of freedom.” There is much scattered evidence throughout the replies to my questions generally, in addition to what I have extracted, which implies that this feel- bd i = a pave} EDUCATION. 255 ing is a very common one. There are many touching evidences of the strong effect of home encouragement and teaching; of this I have already spoken, and need not dwell upon afresh. In corroboration of the conclusions stated in p. 216, on the favourable influence of the Seotch system in developing a taste for science, I re- mark that in these replies, a large proportion of the scientific men who have mentioned any merits in their education, were educated in Scotland. As regards the subjects specially asked for, even by biologists, mathematics take a prominent place. Two of my correspondents speak strongly of the advantages derived from logic, and the weighty judgment of the late John 8. Mill powerfully corroborates their opinions. Accu- racy of delineation is also spoken of, and, owing to the extraordinary prevalence of mechanical aptitudes, | believe that the teaching of me- chanical drawing and manipulation would be ereatly prized. The interpretation that I put on the answers 256 ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE. -[orap. as a whole is as follows: To teach a few congenial and useful things very thoroughly, to encourage curiosity concerning as wide a range of subjects as possible, and not to over- teach. As regards the precise subjects for rigorous instruction, the following seem to me in strict accordance with what would have best pleased those of the scientific men who have sent me returns :—l. Mathematics pushed as far as the capacity of the learner admits, and its pro- cesses utilized as far as possible for interesting ends and practical application. 2. Logie (on the grounds already stated, but on those only). 3. Observation, theory, and experiment, in at least one branch of science ; some boys taking one branch and some another, to ensure variety of interests in the school. 4, Accurate drawing of objects connected with the branch of science pursued. 5. Mechanical manipulation, for the reasons already given, and also because mechani- cal skill is oceasionally of great use to nearly all scientific men in their investigations. These five subjects should be rigorously taught. They are anything but an excessive programme, and v.] 7 EDUCATION. 257 there would remain plenty of time for that variety of work which is so highly prized, as— ready access to books ; much reading of interest- ing literature, history and poetry; languages learnt, probably best during the vacations, in the easiest and swiftest manner, with the sole object of enabling the learners to read ordinary books in them. ‘This seems sufficient, because my returns show that men of science are not made by much teaching, but rather by awakening their interests, encouraging their pursuits when at home, and leaving them to teach themselves continuously throughout life. Much teaching fills a youth with knowledge, but tends pre- maturely to satiate his appetite for more. I am surprised at the mediocre degrees which the leading scientific men who were at the univer- sities have usually taken, always excepting the mathematicians. Being original, they are na- turally less receptive ; they prefer to fix of their own accord on certain subjects, and seem averse to learn what is put before them as a task. Their independence of spirit and coldness of dis- position are not conducive to success in com- S ENGLISH MEN OF SCIENCE, omar, > Ea ¢ petition : they doggedly go their own way, and ; refuse to run races, | . As — CONCLUSION. Science has hitherto been at a disndvantage, compared with other competing pursuits, in en-— listing the attention of the best intellects of the nation, for reasons that are partly inherent out partly artificial. To these I will briefly refer in conclusion, with especial reference to the very 7. important question as to how far the progress” 3 ‘ of events tends to counterbalance or remove y them. | a | If we class energy, intellect, and the like, 4 under the general name of ability, it follows that, other circumstances being the same, those able 4 men who have vigour to spare for extra pro- 4 fessional pursuits, will be mainly governed in the choice of them by the instinctive tastes of their a manhood. The majority will address themselves — to topics nearly connected with human interests 5 4 — a few only will turn to science. This tendency — to abandon the colder attractions of science for 1v.] EDUCATION, 259 those of political and social life, must always be powerfully reinforced by the very general incli- nation of women to exert their influence in the latter direction. Again, those who select some branch of science as a profession, must do so in spite of the fact that it is more unremunerative than any other pursuit. A great and salutary change has undoubtedly come over the feel- ing of the nation since the time when the present leading men of science were boys, for education was at that time conducted in the interests of the clergy, and was strongly opposed to ‘science. It crushed the inquiring spirit, the love of observation, the pursuit of inductive studies, the habit of imdependent thought, and it protected classics and mathe- matics by giving them the monopoly of all prizes for intellectual work, such as scholarships, fellowships, church livings, canonries, bishoprics, and the rest. This gigantic monopoly is yield- ing, but obstinately and slowly, and it is unlikely that the friends of science will be able, for many years to come, to relax their efforts in educa- tional reform. As regards the future provision S 2 for sivelechil followers of science, it is to hoped that, in addition to the smany new open ings in industrial pursuits, the gradual but s , development of sanitary administration and sta tistical inquiry may in time afford the needed , profession. These and adequately paid pol ; | sorships may, as I sincerely hope they will, even in our days, give rise to the establishment of 4 4 a sort of scientific priesthood throughout the — ae whose high duties would have re-— ference to the health and well-being of the nation in its broadest sense, and whose emolu- 4 ments and social position would be made — 4 commensurate with the importance and variety — q of their fancies ) APPENDIX, My schedule of printed questions, together with the ample spaces left for replies, filled, Iam half ashamed to acknowledge, seven huge quarto pages. Jt would be a cumbrous addition to a publication like the present to reproduce these in the same form in which they _ were framed ; and as the following extracts (with trifling variations rendered necessary by the chdnge of form) cover precisely the same ground, and are sufficient for explanation, I abstain from doing so. A circular letter, in which I explained briefly the object of the inquiry, accompanied the schedule, and I 1 [ also omit the description of a notation I proposed to replace in- definite words such as “‘ large,” ‘‘ considerable,” because I have made no use of it in this volume. It is a modification of the class notation used by me in my ‘‘ Hereditary Genius,’’ and was alluded to and illus- trated in my lecture before the Royal Institution, 1874. I have by no means abandoned its advocacy, but have learnt the necessity of explaining and exemplifying it in considerable detail before its merits and convenience are likely to become as generally recognised as I believe they deserve to be. 262 APPENDIX. ‘ i appended to it a reprint of a short article which © he ad written in the Fortnightly Review early inv 187: partly to show the interest with which I had pusueall cognate inquiries, and partly as a guarantee of the tone 4 ~ and spirit in which the inserted communications would a be treated. Also I presumed, and, as it has por not without reason, that being more or less perconallaaay acquainted with a large majority of the scientific men - on my list, they would be inclined to put greater faith — in my discretion than if I had been a stranger: Sub- a ject to these preparatory explanations, the following are. the questions that I circulated :— INQUIRY INTO THE ANTECEDENTS OF SCIENTIFIC MEN, Please return this schedule at your earliest conse q ~S “7 EB. venience, with answers to as many of the questions as _ you consider to be unobjectionable, and send on a sepa- . rate paper any further information that you may think ~ a germane to the inquiry. Entries marked “ Private ” will x $ be dealt with in strict confidence; they will be used a only as data for general statistical conclusions. ; ; ; -Notr—Whenever you consider the grade of the quality about which a question is asked, to fall near — : mediocrity, do not make any entry at all. Christian names of yourself, your father, and your ‘ wee ? e APPENDIX, 263 mother, also her maiden name? Designation and prin- cipal titles of yourself, your father, and the father of your mother? Your father and mother, are they respectively English, Welsh, Scotch, Irish, Jewish, or foreign? If foreign, of what country? Wholly or in what degree ? Was either your father or your mother descended from persons persecuted for political or religious opinions, or from political or religious refugees? If so, state the precise relationship. Mention whether their political or religious opinions became traditional in the family. Occupation of yourself, your father, and the father of your mother? Specify any interests that have been _ very actively pursued by them, in addition to their regular occupation or profession. All the questions in the following paragraph are asked concerning yourself, your father, and your mother respectively :-— Date of the birth of? Place of the birth of (if you do not remember that of either your father or mother, state where he or she resided in early | life)? Mention if it was in a large or small town, a suburb, a village, or a house in the country, To what religious bodies have you (self, father and mother) respectively belonged? To what political parties? Health at the various periods of life? In early adult life, what was your height (to be estimated, where not accurately remembered)? Was there anything dis- 264 | APPENDIX. - tinctive in the figure, &e. (spare, symmetrical, mus- cular, &c.)? Colour of hair ry Complexion (if remark- a ably fair, dark, ruddy, pale, sallow, &c.)? Tempera- * ment, if distinctly nervous, sanguine, bilious, or . “ | lymphatic? Measurement round inside of rim of your al hat? Energy of body, if remarkable; as shown by a power of activity, power of enduring fatigue, restless- ; ness, requiring but little sleep (state how much), early rising, adventures, travel, mountaineering, &c. | (give a few facts)? Energy of mind, if remarkable; c as shown by power of accomplishing a large amount | 4 of brain work, by the vigorous pursuit of interests, . whatever they may be, &c. (give a few facts)? Re- tentiveness of memory (give facts)? Studiousness of disposition and mental receptivity, as shown by large acquirements ? Independence of judgment in social political, or religious matters (give illustrations) ? Originality or ‘eccentricity of character (give illus- trations) ? Special talents, as for mechanism, practi- cal business habits, music, mathematics, &c.? Strongly marked mental peculiarities, bearing on _ scientific success, and not specified above: the following list 4 may serve to suggest—impulsiveness, steadiness, strong 3 feelings and partisanship, social affections, religious bias of thought, love of the new and marvellous, — 4 curiosity about facts, love of pursuit, constructiveness — 4 of imagination, foresight, public spirit, disinterestedness. APPENDIX. 265 Are any peculiarities either very uniformly de- veloped, or also very irregularly developed among yourself, your brothers and sisters, or in the family of your father, or in that of your mother ? State the number of males and that of the females in each of the following degrees of relationship who have attained 30 years of age, or thereabouts :—Grand- parents, both sides; parents, uncles and aunts, both sides; brothers and sisters; first-cousins of all four descriptions ; nephews and nieces. In each of these several degrees of relationship, state the names of » those who have occupied prominent positions or written well-known works, or who from any other cause may be considered as public characters. State their principal achievements, mention the best bio- eraphies, and the most useful among the scattered biographical notices that may exist of them; terms of award of medals, &c. Also, in each of the above degrees of relationship, give the number (with initials or names) of those whose ability in any respect was considerable, but who did not become public characters (fuller information to be sent on a separate paper). Similar information is acceptable concerning other more remote degrees of relation- ship. Brief notes concerning hereditary peculiari- ties of any kind in your family, bodily or mental, would be acceptable. How many brothers and 266 APPENDIX. sisters had you older than yourself, and how many — younger ? = How long were you at small schools, large schools, — universities, and at what ages? Name or placeof school __ or university, and chief subjects taught there. Mention any honours of importance gained by you at schools or universities. To what extent were you educated else- where, taught at home, or self-taught? Was your education especially conducive to, or restrictive of habits of observation? Was it eminently conducive to health or the reverse? What do you consider to have been peculiar merits in it? What were the chief omissions in it, and what faults of commission can you indicate? Has the religion taught in your youth had any deterrent effect on the freedom of your researches ? Can you trace the origin of your interest in science in general and in your particular branch of it? How far do your scientific tastes appear to have been innate ? Were they largely determined by events occurring after you reached manhood, and by what events ? Have you been married? Year in which you were mairied? Maiden name of your wife? Number of living sons and daughters (of all ages) ? State any facts of peculiar interest in your wife’s family. INDEX, Asitity of different races, 19 ; ranks, 23; distribution of, in families, 72. Adams, 8. Adhesiveness, 194. Ages of scientific men, 10; of their parents, 34. Alderson, 41, 68. Amusements, 230. ANTECEDENTS, 1, Aristotle, 35, Axioms, 218, BArcLaAyY, 65. Bateman, 55, Bell scholarship, 23. Bentham, 8, 41, 43, 65. Bidder, 52. Birthplaces of scientific men, 19. Brodrick, 65, 68, 69. Bunsen, 8. . Business habits, 104. CAMBRIDGE honour lists, 66, 69, 257. Carpenter, 43. Catholics, 127. Charity, 228. Clark, Miss, 54. ' Clergymen, 23, 208, 259. Clubs, 5. Colburn, Zerah, 52. Collections, tastes for, 194. Colour of hair of parents, 28, Compton, 65. Councils of scientific societies, 24, Creeds, diversity of, 123, 126; effect of, on research, 135, DAGUERRE, 7. Dalton, 124. Darwin, 41, 45, 63, 65. Data, 10. Dawson Turner, 41, 48. Definition of “Man of Science,” 2 De la Rue, 53. De Morgan, 232. a (see race and birthplace, 16). Discovery, 7. Divines (see clergymen, creeds, and religious bias), Dreams, 234. Duncan, 35, 36. Epvucation, 235; merits in, gen- erally praised, 238 ; variety of subjects, 242; a little science at school, 243; simple things well taught, 243 ; liberty and leisure, 244 ; home teaching and encouragement, 244 (see also 205, 216, 225); merits and demerits balanced, 245; 268 demerits, viz.: narrow edu- cation, 246; want of system and bad teaching, 251; bad, unclassed, 252; summary, 253 ; interpretation of educational needs, 255; educational mono- polies, 223, 259. Encouragement at home, 205 (see also 197, 206, 259) ; of friends, 211 ; of tutors, 215. Energy, 38, 75; above average, 78; below average, 97 ; wasted on trifles, 229. FAILURES, 230. Family characteristics, 69. Faraday, 124. Features inherited, study of, 40. Fellowship, of Royal Society, 3 ; medical, 226; travelling, 219. Female influence, 206, 211, 259 ; hereditarily, 72. Fertility, 36 (see 102). Figure of parents, 28. Figures and tabulation, instinct for, 194. Friends, influence of, 211. Ga.tTon, D., 47, 145; F., 47, 197. Genius, 233. Gilbert, 61, 62. Grove, 3. Harr, colour of, 29. Harcourt, 50, 65. Head, size of, 98. _ Health, 37, 99; of parents, 101. Heath, 24. Height of parents, 30; of scien- tific men, 102. Helena, 15. Heraldry, 197. Herbert, 62; Spencer (see Pre- face). Heredity, 39. Hermia, 15. Hill, 51. Hinton, 61. Holland, Sir H., 63, 100. Home encouragement (see En- courayement), INDEX. Memory, 107 ; good verbal, 109 ; > Hooker, 49. Humphrey, 68. Ipiots, 108, 195, 232; among elder sons, 35. Impulsiveness, 104, Independence of character, 121, 231; of parents, 122. Innate tastes, 186; special, 193 ; not strongly hereditary, 196. JEVons, 58. Kant, 8. Kirchhoff, 8. LAPLACE, 8. Latrobe, 54, 65. Lee, General, 55. : Leverrier, 8. List of scientific men, 4, 6. Logic, 255. Love, 194, Mary, 6. Map of birthplaces, 20. Marriage, best age for, 36. Maskelyne, 65. Mechanical aptitudes, 124 ; draw- ing, 255 ; manipulation, 256. Mechanicians, birthplace of, 19. Medical fellowships, 226. facts and figures, 111; form, 113 ; good, but no particulars, 117 ; bad, 120. Miller, Hugh, 135. Mill, J. S., 139, 148, 255. Milnes, 65. Ministers (see clergymen). Mitchell, Dr. A., 35, Moberly, 68. Moravians, 65, 124, 127. NATIONAL activity, 227, Natural ability, 227, (see also 18). 2 Natural groups, 2. Nature and nurture, 12. Nonconformists, 126. Nurture, 12. INDEX. OccupPATION of parents, 21. Opie, 42. Origin of taste for science, 144 ; extracts at length, 149°; analysis of them, viz.: strongly innate, 186; not innate, 191; tastes bearing on science, 194 ; tastes not very hereditary, 196 ; fortu- nate accidents, 198; indirect motives, 199 ; professional, 202 ; encouragement at home, 205 ; by friends, 211 , by tutors, 215; travel, 218 ; unclassed, 221. PALGRAVE, 49, 68. Paradoxes, book of, 232. Parents of scientific men, their occupation, 21 ; physical pecu- liarities, 27; health of, 201 ; independence of character, 122; relative influence of paternal and maternal lines, 72, 197, 206. Parker, 48. Parkes, 63. Pedigrees, 40. Perseverance, 103. Phillips, 100. Physical peculiarities of parents, 27. Photography, early, 7, 63. Photographic studies of features, 40. Playfair, 55, 65. Plum-pudding, 212. Politics, 207. Population, rates of scientific men to, 10. Portraits, 40. Powell, B., 24. Practical business habits, 104. Priestly, 8, 45. Primogeniture, &c., 33. Prisoners, 76. Professions, influence of, 193, 202. Purity of type, 18, 32, 40. QUAKERS, 65, 124, 127. Qualities, 74. Questions, see Appendix. 269 Race, 16 ; ability of different, 18. Railway statistics, 145. Rank of scientific men, 21; as regards ability, 22. Relatives, number of, 64, Religious bias, 126; sects, 123, 126 ; creed, effect of, on research, 135. Replies, 10; are 100 in number 11 Residuum, the, 23; unclassed of motives, 221. Rome, 229. Roscoe, 41, 57. SANDEMANIANS, 124. Sanitary administration, 260. Scientific men, list of, 4, 6 ; ratio to population, 9 School productiveness of eminent men, 67. Scotch system of education, 215, 225, 255. Scott, 68. Sexual selection, 32, Shakespeare, 14. Smith, W., 65; Arch., 157. Social duties, 228. Societies, scientific and clergymen, 25 224, Somerville, Mrs., 108. Sons, elder and younger, 34. Speciality of taste, 193. Statistics, 147; of heredity, 64. Sterility, 37. Stokes, 8. Strachey, 58. TABULATION, instinct for, 197. Taste for science, innate, 186; not innate, 191, (see Origin of taste). Taylors of Ongar, 41, 60, 65. Temperaments of parents, 27. Travel, 218. Truthfulness, 141, 148. Tutors, influence of, 211. Turner (see Dawson Turner, 48). Twins, 13. # Usoxassa, resid of “infos : ces, 221. Wet cane 124, 126, University education, 236, 257. Urban distribution, 19; ‘popula- tion, 38, —s- Wanrry, 128, e THE END. e LONDON; R, CLAY, SONS, AND TAYLOR, PRINTERS, BREAD STREET BILE, WORKS PUBLISHED BY MACMILLAN & CO, THE BEGINNINGS OF LIFE: Being some Account of the Nature, Modes of Origin, and Transformations of Lower Organisms. By H. CHAruron BAstIAN, M.D., F.R.S., Professor of Pathological Anatomy in University College, London, &c. In Two Vols. With upwards of 100 Illustrations. Crown 8vo. 28s. THE CHILDHOOD OF THE WORLD: a Simple Account of Man in Early Times. By Epwarp Cuiopp, F.R.A.S. Third Edition. Globe 8vo. 3s. Special Edition for Schools. 18mo. 1s. Works by FrANcis GALTON, F.R.S. METEOROGRAPHICA, or Methods of Mapping the Weather, Illustrated by upwards of 600 Printed Lithographic Diagrams. 4to, 9s. *‘Tf the various governments and scientific ‘bodies would perform for the whole world for two or three years what, at a great cost and labour, Mr. Galton has done for a part of Europe for one month, Meteorology would soon cease to be made a joke of.” — Spectator. HEREDITARY GENIUS: An Inquiry into its Laws and Consequences. Demy 8vo. 12s. “T propose,” the author says, ‘“‘to show in this book that a man’s natural abilities are derived by inheritance, under exactly the same limitations as are the form and physical features of the whole organic world.” The Times calls it ‘a most able and most interesting book ;” and Mr. Darwin, in his ‘* Descent of Man” eo i. p. 111), says, “‘ We know, through the admirable labours of Mr. Galton, that enius tends to be inherited.” THE FORCES OF NATURE: A Popular Introduction to the Study of Physical Phenomena. By AM&DE&E GUILLEMIN. Translated from the French by Mrs. NorMANn Lockyer ; and Edited, with Additions and Notes, by J. Norman LOCKYER, F.R.S. Illustrated by 11 Coloured Plates and 455 Woodcuts. Second Edition. Imperial 8vo. cloth extra gilt, 31s. 6d, THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION OF. LIVING THINGS, and Application of the Principles of Evolution to Religion considered as Illustrative of the Wisdom and Beneficence of the Almighty. By the Rev. Gzorce Henstow, M.A., F.L.S. Crown 8vo. 6s. LAY SERMONS, ADDRESSES, AND REVIEWS. By By T. H. HUXLEY, LL.D., F.R.S. New and Cheaper Edition. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. Fourteen Discourses on the following subjects :—1. On the Ad- visableness of Improving Natural Knowledge. 2. Emancipation, Black and White. 38. A Liberal Education, and where to find it. 4, Scientific Education. 5. On the Educational Value of the Natural History Sciences. 6. On the Study of Zoology. 7. On the Physical Basis of Life. 8. The Scientific Aspects of Positivism. 9. On a Piece of Chalk. 10. Geological Contemporaneity and Persistent Types of Life. 11. Geological Reform. 12. The Origin of Species, 13. Criticisms on the ‘Origin of Species.” 14. On Descartes « Discourse, touching the Method of using One’s Reason rightly and of seeking Scientific Truth.” MACMILLAN & CO, LONDON. WORKS PUBLISHED BY MAGMILLAN & 00. CRITIQUES AND ADDRESSES. 8vo. 10s. 6d.. The following is the list of Contents :—1. Administrative Nihilism., 2. The School Boards: what they can do, and what they may do. 3. On Medical Education. 4. Yeast. 5. On the Formation of Coal. 6. On Coral and Coral Reefs. 7. On the Methods and Results of Ethnology. 8 On some Fixed Points in British Ethnology. 9. Paleontology and the Doctrine of Evolution. 10. Biogenesis and Abiogenesis. 11. Mr. Darwin’s Critics. 12. The Genealogy of Animals. 13. Bishop Berkeley on the Metaphysics of Sensation. LESSONS IN ELEMENTARY PHYSIOLOGY. With numerous Illustrations. New Edition. 18mo. cloth. 4s. 6d. ON THE GENESIS OF SPECIES. By Sr. Gzorcr Mivart, F.R.S., &c., Lecturer in Comparative Anatomy at St. Mary’s Hospital. Crown 8vo. Second Edition, to which Notes have been added in reference and reply to Darwin’s ‘* Descent of Man.” With numerous Illustrations. Pp. xv. 296. 9s. Works by JosrrH Jonn Murpny. HABIT AND INTELLIGENCE, in Connection with the Laws of Matter and Force: A Series of Scientific Essays. Two Vols. 8vo. 16s. THE SCIENTIFIC BASES OF FAITH. 8yo. 14s.. THE DEPTHS OF THE SEA: an Account of the General Results of the Dredging Cruises of H.M.SS. ‘‘ Porcupine” and ** Lightning”’ during the Summers of 1868-69 and 70, under the scientific direction of Dr. Carpenter, F.R.S., J. Gwyn Jeffreys, F.R.S., and Dr. Wyville Thomson, F.R.S. By Dr. WyviLLz THomson, Director of the Scientific Staff of the ‘‘ Challenger” Expedition. With nearly 100 Illustrations and 8 coloured Maps and Plans. Second Edition. Royal 8vo. cloth, gilt. 31s. 6d. OLD-FASHIONED ETHICS, AND COMMON-SENSE METAPHYSICS, with some of their Applications. By WitL1AM THomMAS THORNTON, Author of ‘‘ A Treatise on Labour.” 8vo. 10s. 6d. The following are the Contents :—l. Anti-Utilitarianism. II. His- tory’s Scientific Pretensions. III. David Hume asa Metaphysician. IV. Huxleyism. V. Recent Phase of Scientific Atheism. VI. Limits of Demonstrable Theism. CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE THEORY OF NATURAL SELECTION. A Series of Essays. By ALFRED RvuSsSEL Wattace, Author of ‘‘The Malay Archipelago,” &c. Second Edition, with Corrections and Additions. Crown 8vo. 8s. 6d. CALIBAN: THE MISSING LINK. By Daniet Witson, LL.D., Professor of History and English Literature in University College, Toronto. 8vo. 10s. 6d. MACMILLAN & CO. LONDON. / ti ae ie ; ‘ew fee i dibs Be ae 3 eh) ie ee . ; pnt Ita Me or peewee F “rome BiInwING SECT. JUL ee 2 \ : 44 \ / 4 I . i “y he —_ 3 » Vy Ae my f f. ; ata 19 /\ | u ees “ ‘ p r 4 L- | PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE CARDS OR SLIPS FROM THIS POCKET ie OF TORONTO LIBRARY Galton, (Sir) Francis (1822-1911) English men of science 30