THE ENTOMOLOGIST'S ti MONTHLY MAGAZINE: CONDUCTED BY C. G. BARRETT, F.E.S. W. W. FOWLER, M.A., F.L.S. G. C. CHAMPION, F.Z.S. R. McLACHLAN, F.R.S. J. W. DOUGLAS, F.E.S. E. SAUNDERS, F.R.S. LORD WALSINGHAM, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S., &c. SECOND SEEIES-VOL. XIII. [VOL. XXXVIII.] Try to learn something about everything, and everything about something. Huxley. LONDON : GURNET & JACKSON (Mr. Van Voorst's Successors), 1, PATERNOSTER ROW. 1902. mht:-o LONDON : NAPIER, PRINTER, SEYMOUR STREET, EUSTON SQUARE, N.W. MDCCCCII. «»» XvU>< Ent.Month.Mag.,1902,Pl.l. \ Acletoxenus Syrphoides. Edwii V. a bridqe. THE ENTOMOLOGIST'S MONTHLY MAGAZINE SECOND SERIES-VOL. XIII. [VOLUME XXXVIIL] NOTE ON ACLETOXENUS SYRPHOIDES, Feauenfeld. BY J. E. COLLIN, F.E.S. (Plate I.) The genus Acletoxenus belongs to the subfamily DrosopliilincB (as defined by Schiner) of the Aealyptrate Muscidce, and because of the absence of the nervure separating the second basal from the discal cell, and its bare arista, it approaches Aulacigaster and Qitona* In Aulacigaster, however, the middle cross-vein is considerably nearer the base of the wing, being opposite a point in the costa about midway between the humeral cross-vein and the end of the subcostal (first longitudinal) vein, and the head is differently shaped with a produced mouth-edge and only two pairs of fronto-orbital bristles ; A. ruftfarsis has two pairs of the outer dorsal row of bristles on the thorax, the front pair being about halfway down, no presutural bristle and only one sternopleural bristle. The absence of ocellar bristles and the continuation of the costa to the end of the discal (fourth longitudinal) vein, are characters common to both Aulacigaster and Acletoxenus. In Gitona the middle cross-vein is opposite the end of the sub- costal vein, and only separated from the outer cross-vein by a little more than the length of that cross-vein ; it has strongly developed ocellar bristles and rather smaller eyes and consequently larger jowls. Acletoxenus syrpiioides, Frauenf., Verh. z.-b. Ges. Wien (1868), 152, 897. ca sylvata, Dr. Riding.] Xanthorllje limitata (mcnsuraria) , common. X. pZumbaria (pnlumbaria), not common. X. didtjmata, abundant. X. spadiccaria fferrugaria). H. fer- rugata (uvidcntaria). X. montancda. X. fluctuata, common, especially in the garden.— (X. olivata, I have taken this species several times in North Devon many years ago, but cannot remember seeing it in Mortehoe.) X. viridaria (pectinitaria, miaria). Stekrhid^;. Eois aversata, Dr. Dixey. E. dimidiata (scutulata).- E. bisetata, abundant. Leptomeris remutaria. MONOCTENIAD^:. Baptria atrata (diairophyllata) , several. Selibosemid^;. Opisthographis luteolata, (crotagata), common ; also larva?. Diastictis wauaria (u,avaria)i in the garden. Ectropis biundularia (crepuscularia, loricaria). Cleora lichimaria, larvae on lichen on sycamore. Selidosema repandata, common ; very common in 1898. Abraxas grossulariala, common (Dr. Dixey noted it on Lundy Island).— — A. warginaia. Pseudo-panthera punctata (lemerata) , larvae common. Ps. macularia, common. Ps. obscuraria (pullata), not uncommon, both forms. Ps. petraria. Crocota ochrearia (citraria), common. Dr. Riding, in reference to this species, says, "no plants of Daucus carota were to be found." Presumably this refers to the particular spots where he saw the moths. The plant is common enough in Mortehoe. February, 1002]. 25 Hybemia marginaria (progcmmaria), two. Deilinia pusaria, one. D. exanthemata, common. [Metiocampa margarita-ria, Dr. Riding.] M. dolobraria, one specimen. Euchlwna apiciaria, several. Selenia bilunaria (illunaria), several. Gonodontis elinguaria, a few. Poltplocid^:. Habrosyne derasa, a wing in a cob- web ; also larva. Thyatira batis, one in sugar-trap. Sphingid^:. Macroglossa stellatarum, a few most years ; very common 1899. Sphinx ligustri, occasionally on the wing ; also larva). S. convolvuli, at flowers of oarnation, Phlox, Hyacinthui candicans, and Gladiolus, but especially of white tobacco ; repeatedly came to a flower hold in the hand. Quite common in 1898 and 1901 ; also seen in 1885, 1887, and 1899. \_Acherontia Atropos, Dr. Dixey got a larva at Croyde, 1885.] Smerinthus populi. Notodontid.e. Odontosia camelina, larvae. Cerura vinula, larva). [0. furcula, Dr. Riding found larvae at Ilfracombe.] Phalera bucephala, larva? common. LASIOCAMPINA. LASIOCAMPID.3E. Lasiocampa quercus (callunce), larva) common ; the imago seen occasionally ; several males came to a newly-emerged female (also found at Lundy Island by Dr. Dixey). Eriogaster rubi, larva) common. [Also at Lundy Island.] Clisiocampa neustria, larva; sometimes abundant ; the imago occasionally at light. Odonestis potatoria, common ; also larvae. NYMPnALiD*. PAPILIONINA. Argynnis Paphia, common. — —A. Aglaia, common ; one year very common (? 1885). A. selene, abundant locally. Vanessa urtica;, usually common ; abundant in 1895 (also at Lundy Island). IV. polychloros, reported at Lee, Ilfracombe, 1900.] V. io, common ; abundant in 1900. [_V. Antiopa, a specimen seen by the writer's mother (who described the insect accurately) at flowers of Centranthus ruber at Hele, near Ilfracombe, in 1866.]- V. Atalanta, very common; in 1897 abundant (also at Lundy Island). V. cardui, seen nearly every year, but sometimes scarce ; very abundant 1879 ; hibernated specimens in swarms, May, 1884 ; fresh specimens first seen, July 27th of the same year, were very common in August, but less so than in 1879 ; it was common in 1892, but not seen at all in 1901. SATYRIDiE. [Mclanargia galathea, a specimen seen on the wing in 1899 by Mr. D. A. Onslow ; another in the same year seen by both Mr. A. L. Onslow and Mr. P. R- D. Onslow.] 26 ( February, Pararge cegeria, occasionally in lanes ; first seen 1886 ; quite common near the house in recent years, apparently in consequence of the growth of plantations. P. megwra, abundant. Satyrus semele, common ; locally abundant. Epinephele tithonus, one of the commonest butterflies ; very abundant most years, but in 1897 females were scarce, and in 1898 both sexes were only fairly common (Dr. Dixey). E. janira, very abundant ; swarming in 1899 (Dr. Dixey noted it on Lundy Island). E. hyperanthus, common but local. Canonympha parrvphilus, abundant. TjYCMSibm. Tltpcla rubi, several in 1889. T. quercus, two specimens. [Dr. Biding found it " towards Braunton."] Chrysophanus astrarche (medon, agestis, artaxerxes), common. [C circe (dorilis). " At a meeting of the Entomological Society of London on August 6th, 1890, Professor Meldola exhibited a male specimen which had been captured at Ilfracombe in August, 1887. The captor (Mr. O. H. Latter) had supposed it to be a hybrid between C. plilcvas and one of the ' blues,' and had only recently identified it." — Barrett's Lepidoptera of the British Islands, vol. i, p. 62.] C. p/i?ceas> common. Lycmna argiolus, August, 1900. L. icarus (alexis), very abundant, especially 1899. PlERIDiE. [Colias Hyale? or Ednsa var. Helice?, one seen flying by Mr. A. L. Onslow, 1899, near Saunton Court, in Braunton parish.] C. Edusa, in 1892 common, in 1897 one, in 1899 one, in 1900 common. Gonepteryx rhamni, not common. Euchloe cardamines, common. Pieris napi, very abundant.- P. rapae, abundant. P. brassicw, very abund- ant ; swarming in 1899. I do not remember to have ever seen butterflies in suck numbers as this insect and E. janira in that summer. Hespeeiad^:. Hesperia tages, common. Pamphila thaumas (linea), common. P. sylvanus, the commonest of the skippers. PYBALIDINA. GALLERIAD.E. Aphomia sociclla (colonella). Crambidje. Omnibus culmellus, extremely abundant. C. pinellus (pinetellus), two speci- mens. [C. perlcllus (warringtonellus), abundant on Lundy Island, 1898, Dr. Dixey.] C. genicnlcus, very abundant on Morte Point. C. tristellus, abundant. PYRAtJSTID.E. Notarcha ruralis (verticalis). Phlyctainia lutealis, common. P. ferrugalis, rather common. P. prunalis. P. sojnbucalis, one, 1900. Nomophila hybridalis, abundant ; swarming, 1899. 1902.] 27 Pyrausta purpuraUs (ostrinalis) , both forms. [_P. cespitalis,Dv. Riding.] [Scopana resinea, Dr. Riding.] [S. murana, Dr. Riding.] I believe this is the species that is common in my garden. 8. cembrw, three specimens [Also Dr. Riding.] [S. ambigualis, Dr. Riding.] Mesographe forficalis. PTEKOrnouiD^:. Platyptilia acanthodactyla, also larvae found by Mr. F. R. D. Onslow. Pterophorvs pentadactylus. Alucita monodactyla (pterodactyla), common. [A. llthodactyla, Dr. Riding.] [Stenoptilia bipunctidactyla, Dr. Riding.] Omeodes hoxadactyla (polydactyla) , abundant, especially in and about the house, on which honeysuckle grows. PSYCHINA. Zygcena JlUpendulce, very abundant; larva? were moved from the shore to Twitchen, and after a couple of years it was abundant there (also at Lundy Island, near the church, where Mr. Dixey found it abundant). TORTRICINA. EPIBLEMID.E. [O/irosis Uttoralis, Dr. Riding.] Bactra lanceolana, common. Eucosma betuletana, one specimen. E. lacunana, common. Enarmonia wasberiano,, one specimen. Cydia ramella (paykulliana) , two specimens. Notocelia uddmanniana. Epiblcma penkleriana. E. immundana, common. E. Mraquetrana. E. solandriana. Hemimene simpliciana (caUginosana) ?. H. acuminutana ?, one in 1900. Laspeyresia ulicetana. Carpocapsa splendana, one, 1901. TORTRICID^!. Rhacodia caudana, common. [Acalla hastiana, Dr. Riding.] A. sponsana (favillaceana), common among beeches.- — -A. literana, two specimens ; this beautiful species has a habit of drop- ping to the ground when disturbed, and my small experience of it here, and at Ashtead Common, in Surrey, leads me to believe that it may be commoner than it appears. [4. logiana (tristana), Dr. Riding.] A. variegana, very common. A. schalleriana (comparand), both forms rather common. A. contaminana, scarcely abundant ; once taken at sugar. Cacoicia unifasciana, common in the garden. Pandemis corylana, ?. P. heparana. Tortrix forskaleana, one specimen, 1901. [T. conwayana, at Braunton.] [T. chrysanthemana (altcrnella), Dr. Dixey.]- T. incertana (subjectana). PnALONIAD.3E. Euxanthis straminea, at sugar. E. alternana (gigantana). E. zcegana, common. E. hamana. C 2 2g [February, 2EGBMAM*. TINEINA. Trochilium chrysidiforme ?, a single specimen, which I can only attribute to this*-" species, seen on the cliff at Woolacombe, when that place was little but a farm- stead, September 7th, 1888. GrELECHIAD.ffi. Gelechia notatella. Recurvaria cinerella ?, one specimen. Chelaria huebnerella (conscriptella). (Ecophorid^:. Depressaria costosa. D. umbellana, common at sugar. D. arenella, at sugar. D. subpropinquella (rhodochrella) , in thatch. D. oceliana. D. al- strmmeriana, in thatch. -D. applaud, common in thatch ; also taken at sugar. [D. badiella (libanotidella) , Dr. Dixey, 1889].- [D. albipunctella, Dr. Dixey, 1889.] D. heracliana, both imago and larvae abundant. (D. nervosa, a speci- men at Warcombe, Ilfracombe parish, 1890). Acnmpsia pseudosprciella , common in houses. ELACniSTID.ffi. Endrosis lacteella (fenestrella), not common. Plutellidje. Cerostoma xylostella. C. radiatella, common. Plutella cruciferarum, common. Simaethis fabriciana, common. Tinehxe:. Argyresthia andereggiella, this very local species swarms in my orchard. A. nitidella, common. Adela viridella. MICROPTERYGTNA. HEPIALID.E. Hepiahis sylvimis. 77. humuli, abundant. Twitchen, Mortehoe : October 6th, 1901. REVISION OF THE NOMENCLATURE OF MICRO-LEPIDOPTERA. BY THE RIGHT HON. LORD WALSINGHAM, M.A., LL.D., F.R.S., &C, AND JOHN HARTLEY' DURRANT, F.E.S., Memb. Soc. Ent. de France. {Continued from Vol. xxxvii, page 190). GELECHIA, Hb. n. a}'n. = Pseudochelaria, Dietz. [PsEUDoenELARiA, Wlsm. MS. Type, Pseudochelaria pennsylvanica, Wlsm. M.S.]. Pseudochelaria, Dietz, Ent. News., XI, 352-3, PI. I, 3 a, b (1900). 1 {Type), walsinghami, Dietz. 2 pennsylvanica (Wlsm. MS.), Dietz. 1902.] 29 The tentative MS. genus Pseudochelaria, Wlsm., was founded on the unpublished species pennsylvanica^N Ism. MS. Dietz (I. c.) figured the neuratiou of walsinghami, Dietz, and sufficiently described the genus in his description of the species to establish the generic name. Although he remarks that the type of the genus is pennsylvanica, Wlsm., this observation can only apply to Pseudochelaria, Wlsm. MS., the type of Pseudochelaria, Dietz, being obviously walsinghami, Dietz. Mr. A. Busck (i. e., 11.111.1901) informs us that walsinghami, Dietz, must be referred to Gelechia, lib., it therefore follows that Pseudochelaria, Dietz (nee Wlsm. MS.), must sink as a synonym of that genus, while Pseudochelaria, Wlsm. MS. (nee Dietz), being invalid through homonymy, will require a new name. (To be continued). ON THE SYSTEMATIC POSITION OF TIIAUMATONEURA INOPINATA, McLachlan ("ORDER ODONATAJ, WITH SOME REMARKS ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE SUBORDER ZYGOPTERA. BY PHILIP P. CALVERT, Ph.D., Instructor in Zoology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa., U.S.A. In this Magazine for June, 1897, pages 130-1, Mr. McLachlan described a remarkable Odonate under the name Thaumatoneura inopinata, gen. et sp. nov., referring it to the subfamily Calopteryginee and to the legion Amphipteryx, Selys. The region of the earth whence the unique type came was unknown, but this lack of information was supplied by a second note from Mr. McLachlan, also published in this Magazine, August, 1900, p. 189, to the effect that M. Eene Martin possessed a specimen from Chiriqui, in Panama. This note attracted my attention more especially because I have been studying the Odonata brought together for Messrs. Godman and Salvin's " Biologia Centrali-Amencana," and it became necessary to analyse the species. As M. Martin's specimen was much more com- plete than the original type, I asked M. Martin for a photograph of it. This he has lately sent me, together with a drawing of the appendages which terminate the abdomen of the male.* Thanks to his kindness, 1 am able to more intelligently study the questions of classification which the discovery of this insect involves. * Mr. McLachlan's type specimen has been figured in Biol. Centrali-Amcricana, Nev.roplera, PI. 3, together with some details from M. Martin's example. gO [February, As stated above, Mr. MeLachlan considers Thaumatoneura a C alopter ygine. While I hesitate to differ from such a high and excellent authority, I have come to the conclusion that this genus is more closely related to certain members of the subfamily Agrionince. The evidence on either side of this question appears to be as follows : — In favour of Us Calopteuygine affinities. 1. — The number of ante nodal cross-veins, 3 — 5. 2. — The density of the reticulation, shown not only by the presence of supple- mentary sectors between all the principal ones, but also by the presence of cross- veins in the post-costal area beginning at, or in front of, the level of the arculus. In favour of its Agrionine affinities. 3. — The point of separation of the median sector from the principal sector, which is distinctly nearer (f — f) to the nodus than to the arculus. 4. — The position of the nodus, at about one-fifth the length of the wing. Passing now to discuss these features, character (1) is unquestionably that commonly employed as the chief diagnostic of the Calopierygince, since the Agrionince, with but few exceptions, possess but two antenodal (or antecubital) cross-veins. However, at least two Agrionine genera are now known, Neurolestes, Selys,* and Neuragrion, Karsch,f in which three antenodals normally exist. The lowest number of antenodals hitherto known for the Calopterygince is five in the genus Micromerus. Since the number of antenodals in Thaumatoneura varies from three to five, we have a complete transition from the Calopterygince to the Agrionince in this particular respect. (2). I am not aware that any Agrionince show a density of reticulation equal to that possessed by Thaumatoneura, but Megaloprepus approaches it quite closely in the number of supplementary sectors, and in having the cross-veins of the post- costal area beginning often in front of the level of the apex of the quadrilateral. But since many Caloptergginai (legion Libel/ago, Dicterias, etc.) possess a quite simple reticulation, density of reticulation cannot be accepted as a chief Calop* ierygine feature. (3). The Calopterygince have the point of separation of the median and principal sectors much nearer to the arculus than to the nodus, the reverse being the case in the Agrionince, with the exception of the legion Lestes, Selys, in which latter the condition is the same as in the Calopterygince. The nearest approaches among the Calopterygince to the condition found in the Agrionince (exclusive of Lestes) seem to be in Heliocharis, where the median sector separates at one-third the distance from the arculus to the nodus, and the Japanese Palaophlebia, Selys, * A West African form, of the legion Podagrion, Selys, having three antenodals on all the wings, the third one placed between the other two of most Agrioniact. Mem. Couron. Acad. Sc. Belg., xxxviii, p. 70, 1886. + Also of the legion Podagrion, from Ecuador, having three antenodals on the hind-wings only, the third being likewise median and confined to the subcostal space. Soc. Ent., vi. p. 100, 1891.' 1902.] 31 where the median sector arises at one-half that distance: As regards the number of antenodals, Heliocharis and Palceophlebia are typical Calopterygince. (4). The position of the nodus varies in both the Calopterygince and the Agrionina, but in general it is farther from the base of the wing in the former than in the latter. Among the first-named it is probably nearest the base (one-third the wing-length) in Amphipteryx and in Chalcupteryx, among the second group it is farthest from the base (more than one-third the wing-length) in Archilestes. No Calopterygince have the nodus as near to the base as one-fifth the wing-length, but many Agrionince have it in that position. On the whole, therefore, I believe that Thaumatoneura is rather Agrioninc than Galopterygine in its affinities. The question next arises, to what Agrionince is it most closely related ? The existence of a " true " pterostigma, of supplementary- sectors, of forcipated superior appendages in the male, as well as the shape of the quadrilateral, place Thaumatoneura in the legion Podagrion, Selys. The nearest ally therein is Paraphlebia, Selys, of Mexico and Central America, which of all others of this legion has the most complicated reticulation, and which, like Thaumatoneura , has two submedian cross-veins (two nervules in the lower basal cell), the nodus at one-fifth the length of the wing, the post-stigmatical area densely reticulated, the arculus at the second antenodal, the nodal sector arising at ahout the middle of the length of the wing, the subnodal at about the nodal point, the median before the nodus [in P. hyalina, teste Brauer], and very short inferior appendages in the male. Differences between Thaumatoneura and Paraphlebia exist in the number of antenodals, the length of the quadrilateral, the shape of the pterostigma, the exact relative positions of the sub- median cross-veins, and the point where the wings cease to be petioled. None of these differences, however — after what has been said on the number of antenodals— seem to me to be of greater than generic value. But Thaumatoneura raises other questions more difficult of solution. Any one who accepts my conclusion that this genus is more Agrionine than Calopteryrjine must also abandon the old distinction between these two subfamilies based on the number of antenodals. Failing this, the next available character is that offered by the point of origin of the median sector, and this gives us the following result: — Median sector separating from the principal nearer to the arculus than to the nodus (half-way in Palceophlebia). Antenodals five or more, cross-veins in the postcostal area beginning before the level of the apex of the quadrilateral (except in some Diphlebia). CALOPTEBYGIN-E. 32 [ February, Antenodals two, cross-veins in the postcostal area beginning at the level ol t lu" apex of the quadrilateral. Legion Lestes, Selys, of the Agrionin.i:. Median sector separating from the principal much nearer to the nodus than to the arculus. Antenodals two to five, but- usually two. A.GRIONIN.3E exclusive of the legion Lestes. We must consequently determine what position to assign to Lestes. Many courses are open, but only two seem to me worth considering at the present time. 1. To regard all the Zygoptera as but a single group, in which case the various 'legions" of the Galopteryginw and the Agrionincc (both terms sensu Selysii) , as well as the legion Lestes, might rank as equal and co-ordinate sub-groups, and it would make little difference whether these sub-groups were termed " legions " or " sub-families." 2. The legion Lestes might be con- sidered as co-ordinate with the Selysian Calopterygince and Agrionince (excl. Lestes), in which case they would be properly termed Lestince. This course seems to me to be the better until some future, thorough- going revision of the structure, of both the nymphs and the adults, of all the groups of Zygoptera, of all parts of the world, shall give us a fuller knowledge of relationships. Pertinent to the present topic is the recent suggestion of Mr. Kirby that a new genus from the island of Hainan, which be has described as Pseudolestes (Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist., June, 1900, p. 537), "should certainly form the type of a new sub-family " {I.e., p. 538). I am quite unable to agree with Mr. Kirby in this conclusion, for colour and general shape, to which he appeals, do not constitute subfamily characters. The straightness of the wing-sectors is paralleled in Ortholestes, Calvert, and perhaps also in Orolestes, McLachlan, and the pterostigma is not sufficiently different (to judge from the figure) from that of various Lestine genera. Only iD two features does Pseudolestes differ from all other Lestina;, and these are that the hind-wings are one-third shorter than the front wings, and that the quadrilateral is oblong, not oblique on the apical end. In this latter feature we have an approach to various Calopterygine and Agrionine genera, but on the other hand Ortholestes again furnishes a connecting link with Archilestes, Merjalestes and Lestes. Without hesitation, therefore, I place Pseudolestes in the legion Lestes, of Selys, or, to use the proposed new term, in the subfamily Lestince. Philadelphia, U. S. A.: 1901. 1902. j 33 TEICHOPTEBA, PLANIPENNIA, AND ODONATA COLLECTED BY LORD WALSINGHAM IX THE VICINITY OF GRANADA (STAIN; IN 1901. 8\" ROBERT McLACHLAN, F.R.8., &c. During his recent visit to Spain (so pleasantly narrated in our No. for October, 1901) Lord Walsiugham was good enough to collect a few " Xeuroptera " for me near Granada, and I have found thenj very useful. The district had previously been worked by Rambur and Edouard Pictet, so much of the materials is only confirmatory of their reports, but several species will be found in the list given below that were not noticed by them. TRICHOPTERA. Micrupttrus testacea, G-mel. — May 3ist, 1 $ . Oligoplectrum maculatum, Oliv., also noticed by Rambur.— 4 examples, May 21st and June 4th. PLANIPENNIA. MYEMELEONIDi. Palpares hispanus. Hag. — 2 & and 2 $ , middle of June. Creagris plumbens, Oliv. — 3 5 , May 27th and middle of June. A^calaphidj:. Bubopsis agriuides, Ramb. — 1 var. aurantiaca of Ischnura elegans from the New Forest. Mr. Ashdown, extreme variations in size of the following Coleoptera : — Clytus arietis, C. my sticus, Motor chus minor, and Pachyta cerambyciformis. Mr. West, a species of Homoptera, Stictocoris flaveolus, new to the British list, and taken by himself at Blackheath in August and September, 1901. JVIr. Thornthwaite, a dark Hybernia defoliaria, taken by him on his way to the meeting. Mr. W. J. Kaye, a beautiful series of Ambulyx rostralis, a S. and Central American Sphingid, with specimens of var. ganascus, which some consider a species ; also a single specimen of a new species of Ambulyx, which he had taken during the past summer while on an expedition to the interior of British Guiana. Messrs. Harrison and Main, varied series of (1) Triphcena comes from several localities, including the Isle of Lewis ; (2) Agrotis tritici, from the Isle of Lewis and Wallasey; (3) Odontopera bidentata ; (4) Camptogramma bitineata ; (5) Melanippe sociata, all from the Isle of Lewis. Mr. R. Adkin, several of the same species from the Isle of Lewis, with Noctua xanthographa, particularly fine and varied Boarmia repandata, Coremia ferrugata, and Xylophasia monoglypha ; he also showed an example of Pieris Daplidice, with Colias Hyale and C. Edusa taken at Eastbourne, 1901. Mr. Montgomery, a very fine bred series of Pieris napi, including a number of fine examples of var. bryonice, from ova laid by a female D 2 44 [February, taken by Mr. Harrison at Meyringen, July 9th, 1900 ; a scries of bred Leucophasia sinapis, consisting of four broods from ? s scut alive to him ; and bred series of Argynnis Paphia, and var. Valezina from New Forest ova. Mr. Porritt, black forms of Pharetra menyanthidis from Selby ; Mania typica, with a large, pale, pinkish, V'shaped mark across each wing ; Cqsmia trapezina, with central band dark olive-green: black Larentia mullistrigaria ; a yellow Anchocelis rufina; and a black Qdonlopera bidentata; all from Yorkshire. Mr. Garrett, Sphinx convolvuli, from Wilts, September, 1901 ; Miselia oxyacanthce, and var. capucina, from Wimbledon ; Epunda lutulenta, taken off ripe blackberries at Reading; Dasycampa rubiginea from Berkshire; and Treniocampa populeti from Wimbledon Common. Mr. Chittenden, Lithosia sericea ; var. conjiuens of Anthro- ceratrifolii; black Nyssia hispidaria ; Zonosoma pendularia, blue from Lancashire, light from Kent ; Cymatophora duplaris, black, bred from Kent; dark Pachetra leucophcea ; dark Hybernia marginaria, Kent ; &c. Mr. Gr. B. Brown, a specimen of Euvanessa Antiopa, taken by his little boy at Lee, together with a Sphinx con- volvuli taken at Lycld, the former on August 24th, and the latter on September 1 1th. Major Ficklin, two very pale Dianthaecia luteago, var. Fick/ini, and one with suffused marking; together with an example of Brenthis Selene with very dork under wings. Mr. Stanley Edwards, several species of the "Leaf" butterflies, Kallima, and a box of exotic Papilios. Dr. Chapman, Pterin brassicce, with blank marginal line in hind-wing ; Argynnis Adippe, var. cklorodippe, with black suffu- sion ; and a dark variety of Mefitaa Athalia, from Spain. Mr. Rowland-Brown, series of Lyccena Dolus, var. vittata, from Cannes, and L. Admetus, var. Ripperhi, for comparison ; a var. of Melitaa Cinxia, with the black spots on the under-side almost absent ; and Argynnis Lathonia, with the left lower wing abnormally small. Mr. Sich, small dark var. of Aglais urticce ; two varieties of Xy/ojihasia po/yodon, one having a dark median band, the other with confluent stigmata ; a Plusia gamma having the Y mark reduced to a pale spot. December 12th, 1901.— Mr. W. J. Lucas, B.A., F.E.S., Vice-President, m the Chair. Mr. Newnharn, llersham, Surrey, was elected a Member. Mr. McArthur exhibited a J specimen of Lasiocampa quercus taken at Brighton, and having the female coloration. Mr. Kirkaldy, a specimen of the Heteropteron, Eeduviolusjerus ?, having the wings on one side brachypterous, and on the other macropterous. Mr. F. M. B. Carr, bred series of Selenia illunaria, compared with the ? parents, and showing considerable variation ; series of Enno- mos angularia from several localities for comparison ; Dicycla oo from Chingford ; varied series of Bryophila muralis from Hythe ; and series of Acidalia margine- punctata from llythe and Rorlock, the latter being much the darker. Dr. Chapman read a paper, entitled, " A few weeks in Central Spain," and exhibited long and varied series of the Spanish forms of British Lepidoptera, and of species very closely allied to British ones. — Ht. J. Tuknkb, Hon. Secretary. Entomological Society of London : December dth, 1901. — The Rev. Canon W. W. Fowler, M.A., F.L.S., President, in the Chair. Mr. Frederick E. S. Adair, Flixton Hall, Bungay ; Mr. William Aiming, Box 1902.] 45 Hill, Surrey, and 39, Lime Street, London, E.G. ; Mr. Edward Connold, 7, Magdalen Terrace, St. Leonards-on-Sea ; Mr. Frederick Muir, 86, Christchureh Street, Ipswich ; Mr. R. Shelford, The Museum, Sarawak, Borneo ; and Mr. John Wad- dington, 38, Leicester Grove, Blackmail Lane, Leeds ; were elected Fellows of the Society. Mr. J. II. Carpenter exhibited a number of Colias Hyale bred from ova laid by the parent butterfly taken at Sheerness, August 18th, 1900. Mr. J. W. Tutt said that twelve months ago there was no reliable evidence as to the stage in which Hyale passed the winter, but that Mr. Carpenter had proved that it hibernates in the larval state, and pupates and emerges in the spring. No one has yet successfully bred C. Edusa through the winter, as they do not and cannot feed up these in this country. Hyale, on the other hand, is perfectly quiescent during the winter months (October 20th to February 3rd, according to Mr. Carpenter's observations). Mr. R. S. Standen, specimens of Lyccena dolus, the type from Bordighera, and also Pieris brassica with greenish urider-wings, a common form in the neighbourhood of Florence. Mr. C. P. Pickett, pupa-cases of Saturnia pavonia, one with two openings, one with no opening, and a third containing three pupa?, from one only of which the imago had emerged. Mr. J. W. Tutt said that this phenomenon was probably due to overcrowding. The Rev. A. E. Eaton, some adult Psychodida of morphological interest, preserved in cork tubes with 2°/0 Formic Aldehyde in dis- tilled water. (1) Pericoma notabilin, Etn., as a sample of male flies retaining prothoraeic air-nipples, such as Curtis figured (Brit. Ent., xvi, 7-45 [1839]), and are possessed by pupa? of both sexes, illustrated both by Miall and Walker and by Fritz Muller in the volume of the Transactions of this Society for 1895 ; also by Kellog, Ent. News, xii, 48, figs. A, B (February, 1901). Pericoma soleata, Hal. MS., has similar small claviform air-nipples on the prothorax ; and so have some undescribed species more nearly related to P. notabilis, natives of middle Europe or of Algeria. (2) Male flies possessing erectile sacs, or else protrusible tentacles arising one on each side of the mesothorax near the spiracle, and receiving a strong branch from the main trachea of each side. In the state of contraction these sacs or tentacles resemble a tuft of hair, which is very dense in some flies: by their distension, the tufts are either spread open, or the tuft is resolved into scattered hairs distributed over at least the whole of the upper surface of the tentacle. These organs are pro- bably subservient to sexual attraction, and, perhaps, secrete scent. A few males possess them, in addition to the pair of prothuracic air-nipples, for instance. P.fusca and the species figured by Curtis, P. auriculata (both exhibited) ; but more species are possessors of the mesopleural pair of appendages alone. The two species last named differ in the shape of their thoracic appendages now under consideration : the male P.fusca has short, chitinous, slightly curved, prothoraeic air-nipples, and short nipple-like mesopleural appendages that spread a dense epaulet-like tuft of hair ; while P. auriculata has slender, club-shaped, whitish, prothoraeic air-nipples, and mesopleural tentacles that are clad with silky hair, and are capable of great extension. But in the majority of species furnished with this kind of tracheate appendages issuing from the mesothorax, those of the prothorax are absent ; and some have appendages of the sac form, others of the tentacular form. Among the exhibits, Ulomyia fuliginosa, Pericoma nubila and trivialis are exponents of the short, nipple-like, erectile, sac-shaped mesopleural type of appendage seen in P. 46 [February, fusca ; while Pericoma palustris, mutua, and the nameless species from the Sehwarzwald, together with P. cognata, which was not exhibited, have the tentacular type of mcsopleural appendage seen in P. auriculata. Mr. H. St. J. Donisthorpe read a paper, entitled, " The Life History of Clythra ^-punctata ;" and Mr. G-. W. Kirkaldy communicated " A Memoir upon the Rliynchotal Family Capsidce." — II. Rowxand-Bkown, Hon. Sec. ON TIIE SPECIFIC VALUE OF BYBLIA GOTZIUS, Heebst. BT GUY A.. K. MARSHALL, F.Z.S. Some years ago I recorded the statement of Mr. J. M. Hutchin- son, of Esteourt, Natal, that he had bred a specimen of the wet season form of Byblia ilithyia, v. acheloia, Wallg., from an egg laid by typical ilithyia, Drury (A. and M. Nat. Hist. (G), xviii, p. 338, 1896), as a result of which 1 followed Mr. Trimen in regarding i?. Gotzius, Hbst., and its local race acheloia, as merely varieties of Drury's insect. This view was afterwards opposed by Dr. Dixey in his interesting review of the genus (Proe. Zool. Soc, 1898, p. 376) ; and later also by Prof. Chr. Aurivillius (lihop. Aeth., pp. 158, 159). During the past season I determined to obtain further evidence on the point by breeding these insects from the egg; Salisbury being a specially suitable locality for such an experiment, owing to the fact that both forms occur here in about equal numbers, which 1 do not remember to have observed in any other part of South Africa. My attempts to induce the $ s to lay in captivity were futile, but with the expenditure of a considerable amount of time, I succeeded in obtaining from twelve to fifteen authenticated eggs of each form in the field. The food-plant and the general habits of the two insects appear to be identical, and they both possess the curious habit, which occurs among a good many of our butterflies, of laying most of their eggs indiscriminately at some little distance from the food plant : an instinct probably developed to evade the attacks of various egg- destroyers, which would principally frequent the food-plants of their victims. From these eggs I obtained fourteen butterflies in all, and in every case these bred true to their respective parents. This evi- dence would not be very cogent in itself, were it not supported by certain differences exhibited by the two forms in their larval and pupal instars. In the case of the larvae it seemed at first as though there might be a reliable distinction in the structure of the spines, but with the examination of further material it became evident that there was a certain amount of individual variation in this direction which rendered the character useless. 1902.] 47 Finally it proved that the only trustworthy distinction was a small, but stable, difference in colour ; for whereas in Uitln/ia the broad central yellow stripe is divided by a narrow longitudinal black line ; in nchelo'ia there is no such division, the stripe being unicolorous throughout. This character is based on the breeding results obtained from about thirty specimens, which will probably be sufficient to establish its validity. It applies, however, only to the dark form of the larva, which predominates so much in this locality, that I have succeeded in finding only two examples of the green form. All those bred from the egg being dark. Unfortunately both of these green larvse proved to be acheloia, so that T can only compare them with a description of the green form of ilithyia, which I made in Natal. The points of difference are as follows : - The Natal ilithyia is entirely dull green, with a narrow, duplicated, pale yellow, central line ; each segment has on its anterior edge three black spots, one in the middle of the central line, and the others on each side of it. On the other hand, the Salisbury aclteloia is dull green, with a broad central greenish-white stripe, containing a slightly darker, narrow, single, central line in one example, but uniform in the other ; segments with- out any black spots. Owing, however, to the paucity of specimens, these distinctions cannot be regarded as reliable. The differences which exist between the pupa1 of the two insects, though com- paratively slight, are of more importance owing to their being differences of struc- ture, and not merely of coloration. In the first place the vertical cephalic projections are very slightly, but yet appreciably, more prominent in ackelo'ia ; and, further, in this insect the dorsal hump on the mesothorax is more distinctly carinate on its anterior declivity. But the most noticeable feature is the difference in the contour of the two pupre as seen from above. The dorsal, or posterior, margin of the pupal wing after leaving the prominent shoulder bends strongly inwards as far as the first abdominal segment, and from there it curves outwards in a bold sweep, which attains its greatest width on the third segment. This outward curve is much more strongly marked in ackelo'ia than in ilithyia, as the following measurements show : — Ilithyia. Achelo'ia. Length of pupa 185 mm 18-5 mm. Width at shoulders 60 „ 6"0 „ ,, at 1st abdominal segment ... 4'5 „ 4"5 „ „ at 3rd „ „ ... 55 „ 60 „ There seems to be no difference in colour between the two pupre beyond a con- siderable range of individual variation. In the long series of ilithyia bred by Mr. Hutchinson in Natal the green type of pupa vastly predominated, there being only about 5 per cent, of the brown form. My own experience was just the reverse, the green form being entirely absent, though the surroundings were often such as would tend to produce that colour in a fully sensitive pupa. 48 [February 1902. Observation of the conditions under which the larvae of Bi/hlia exist in this locality tend to throw some light on the probable cause of their marked dimorphism. In the short herbage of the open veldt round Estcourt the nettle upon which these insects feed stools out into a low clump-like growth, amidst which the green larva is well concealed, but the dark fortn is decidedly conspicuous To any one who has only observed the latter under these circumstances the explanation of its distinctive colouring must present a decided difficulty. But widely distributed species such as these must en- counter varying conditions throughout their range, and to these they must be able to adapt themselves. Such is doubtless the case in the present instance. For in the rank growth of this country this particular nettle assumes a somewhat creeping habit with more widely distant leaves, and is especially fond of twining itself among the close woody stems of several small shrubs. When a dark Byhlio larva is seen upon the plant under these conditions the protective value of its dark and light stripes at once becomes obvious, and this probably accounts for the much greater prevalence here of the dark form in both the larva and the pupa. It would be of much interest to ascertain the larval colours assumed by these two species in various parts of their extended range, and especially in relation to the habits of their food plant. The differentiation of the larvae into two forms is probably of considerable antiquity, as may be judged partly from the marked character of the dimorphism, all tendency to intermediate variation having been eliminated ; but principally from the fact that the two types may be readily distinguished from the first moult. The larva of acheloia cannot be distinguished for certain from that of ilithyia until its fourth stage. And since in its third stage it exhibits distinct traces of the dark central line characteristic of the latter insect, this fact, in conjunction with its smaller range, points to the conclusion that it is a later development from the typical species. It is probable that India was the original home of the genus, and it possibly took part in that great influx of animal life from Asia into Africa, which, according to the suggestion originally made by Huxley, took place in later Miocene times. The new conditions under which it then found itself would thus lead to the preservation of suitable varieties, resulting in the establishment of B. Gotzius and its various local forms. Following out this supposition the Madagascar sub- species B. Gutzius-anvatara would have arisen subsequent to the isolation of that island, owing its origin to the occasional immigration of examples of Gotzius from the mainland And this view is supported March, 1902.] 4,9 by the fact that along the East African littoral Gotzius is the dominant species almost to the exclusion of ilitkyia, which prefers the cooler uplands and plateaux of the interior. In comparing the wet season forms of these two species the most striking difference which presents itself is the absence in ackeloia of the broad white bauds on the under-side of the hind-wings. There is, I believe, an important significance in this deviation from the colouring of the typical species ; for achcloia, when at rest, presents thereby a notable remsemblance to the wide-spread and distasteful Acrcea Terpsichore L. (A. serena, auctt.), and its various subspecies. This fact will probably throw some light ou the peculiar distribution of the two species of Byblia. For certainly, so far as South Africa is concerned, the ranges of ackeloia and A. Terpsickore-Rougeti, Boisd. {A. Buxtoni, Butl.), are practically coincident ; whereas in the strong- holds of ilitkyia this Acrcea is of rare occurrence, or, more frequently, entirely absent. In the warmer and more luxuriant lowlands the development of bird and butterfly life is at its maximum, and the struggle for existence is consequently keenest. And it is precisely in such localities that ackeloia has ousted ilithyia, which we cau readily understand as soon as we realise the higher protective value of its incipient mimetic colouring. The persistence of the broad white stripes on the under-side (in conjunction with the uniform dark background) in the dry season forms of both species is doubtless due to their procryptic value upon the same principle as the tiger's stripes. The following is a detailed description of the larva of B. Gotzius- ackeloia : Full-grown larva : — Length, exclusive of cephalic horns, 25 to 30 nun. ; head black, except a broad band of dull green extending from the back of horns to the anterior margin of 2nd segment. The lateral portions of lobes are fairly closely set with short stout white spines of varying lengths, and there are also a few on the vertex ; these spines arc sparsely scattered with very short white hairs. The vertex of each lobe is gradually produced into a very long cephalic horn, measuring about 4.5 mm. This horn is only very slightly narrowed to apex, where it is distinctly clubbed, the club bearing a vertical spine surrounded by a whorl of five short thick spines, with usually either one or two additional thinner ones. The main stem of the horn bears nine or ten irregularly placed short spines, much thinner than those on the club, and is also studded with minute setigerous tubercles. The colour of the horn is dark-greenish black and the stem spines black, usually with white bases. TJie horns are placed much more vertically than in Precis, and are thus more nearly in a line with the front of the face ; when at rest the head is bent in sharply so that they project straight out in front. Body cylindrical, set with series of stout branched spines. The spines have a short thick base (1 mm. in the largest), on the E 50 [March, summit of which is a thin vertical spike, distinctly longer than the basal part, surrounded by a whorl of similar but shorter spikes of varying number. In the two dorsal rows, which are the largest, the whorl contains four spikes, except on 3rd and 4th segments, in which it has Qve and sometimes six, and on 11th and 12th, where it has five, but sometimes only four. The subdorsal and lateral rows of spines have only three spikes in the whorl, except on segments 3, 4, 5 and 6, where there are four and rarely five. In the sublateral row the base of the spine is reduced to a mere tubercle, and the whorl contains either three or four spikes. The colour of the body spines is black with a dark blue metallic reflection, but the summit of the dorsal spines from which the whorl springs is greenish-white, and the whorl spikes in the lateral and sublateral rows are white. Second segment with a group of three short simple black spines on either side of central line, and below them a white whorled lateral spine, and a similar sublateral one just above the leg. Third and fourth segments with a dorsal, lateral and sublateral whorled spine on either side. Abdominal segments similar, but with an additional subdorsal spine. The 11th and 12th segments differ, however, from all the rest in having an additional spine on the median line ; these spines have a whorl of five spikes, but differ from the others in having no central spike. The segmental incisions are not very deep, and the abdominal segments are broken into four rings ; the anterior one comprises rather more than half the segment and carries the spines ; the remaining three are narrow and subequal. General colour velvety black or very dark brown, with a broad pale yellow, or dirty white, central stripe between the dorsal spines. A lateral ochreous-red or yellow stripe, lying between and including the subdorsal and lateral spines, well defined on thoracic, very ill-defined and broken up on abdominal, segments ; being encroached upon by two diagonal blackish lines, starling from the same point at apex of segment and sloping downwards and forwards ; the upper longer one passes between the spines and through the spiracle, the lower runs only to the base of the sublateral spine. The entire upper surface of the larva is sparsely scattered with minute white shagreen dots, often irregularly arranged in transverse rows. First stage. — Length, at termination, about 4 mm. Head dark brown, witli about a dozen scattered black hairs, the lower ones short, those on vertex moderately long ; no cephalic horn. Colour of body greenish-white, with three large irregular lateral patches of dark brown ; the anterior one extending from behind middle of 3rd to middle of 5th segment; the middle one on 7th and slightly encroaching on 8th; the posterior one on 10th and 11th segments. Body glabrous. The segments have the following arrangement of tubercles from either side of central line downwards. Second segment : a large composite dorsal tubercle bearing four seta;, a single subdorsal tubercle bearing one seta, two lateral tubercles placed longitudinally, the anterior bearing two setae, the posterior none ; lastly, a tubercle above leg with two seta\ Third and fourth segments : a regular transverse row of five tubercles, the dorsal, subdorsal, and that above leg with a single seta each, remainder with two. Abdominal segments with six tubercles on either side, bearing one seta each ; 1st and 3rd placed near anterior edge, 2nd much further back, 4th and 5th placed longitudinally close together in the segments with claspers, but transversely in the others. Second stage. — Greatest length, (5 mm. Head entirely black, shiny, with scat- 1302.] 51 tered small black tubercles bearing long black seta; (no sign of white tubercles) ; vertex of each lobe produced into a short, thick, cephalic horn, about two-thirds as long as the face, of a transparent testaceous-yellow colour, and irregularly set with comparatively largo setigerous tubercles. Second segment has on cither side of central lino a collection of four small pale conical tubercles, each bearing a long seta, and around their bases are six or seven short setae ; a much larger, white, conical, subdorsal tubercle, with one apical and three lateral black setae ; two minute uni- setigerous tubercles placed below and in front of spiracle ; above leg a conical tubercle, with an apical and three lateral setse. On the third and fourth segments the dorsal tubercles are very stout, and their apices are produced into a short central projection, bearing a long black seta, surrounded by a whorl of five or six similar projections ; the subdorsal tubercle is similar but smaller, and below it is one above the leg like that on second segment. The abdominal segments have similar dorsal, subdorsal, lateral tubercles, the irregularly placed second tubercle of the first stage having disappeared ; and the eleventh and twelfth have the additional central tubercle as in the mature larva. The colouring is very similar to that of the first stage, being greenish- or yellowish-white, with the small, ill-defined, lateral patches, but these are now joined by a narrow broken brown line running just above the subdorsal tubercles. The white shagreen tubercles are absent, but short black setse are very sparsely distributed over the surface, more particularly round the bases of the tubercles. The dorsal tubercles on segments 4, 7, and 11 are brownish, the remainder whitish. Third stage. — The structure of the body spines and cephalic horns is practically identical with that in the mature larva, the latter being much longer than in the second stage, viz., one and half times the length of the face. The head is still entirely black, but a few white tubercles make their appearance, and the cephalic horns are entirely black. The ground colour of the body is of a much more pro- nounced greenish or yellowish tinge, thus showing up the paler central stripe, which is divided by a narrow, slightly darker, line. The dark lateral patches of the earlier stages are here scarcely distinguishable, the pigment apparently having concentrated in the dorsal and subdorsal spine stems, which are almost black on all the segments, except 6, 9, 10, and 13, on which they are whitish, but with the greater part of their apical spikes black. The remaining are so similar to the full-grown larva as to need no detailed description. Salisbury, Mashoualand : October, 1901. EYMENOPTERA COLLECTED BY COL. YERBURY IN S.-W. IRELAND IN 1901. ACULEATA BY EDWARD SAUNDERS, F.L.S.,; CURYSlDIDJi AND TENTHREDINW.K. BY REV. P. D. MORICE, M.A., F.E.S. ; ICHNEUMONID.E (INCLUDING A SPECIES NEW TO OUR FAUNA) BY CLAUDE MORLEY, F.E.S. ACULEATA. Colonel Yerbury, during his recent visit to Ireland, was good enough to collect Hijmcnoptera on my behalf, and amongst the Acu- 52 [March, leates of the collection are many species of considerable interest, although there is none actually new to our lists. All, however, are interesting, on account of the localities, and some on account of their very unusual coloration. Amongst the latter may be mentioned speci- mens of Crabro dimidiatus which have almost entirely lost their yellow markings ; a small black $ of C. 4s-maculatus belonging to the var. geniculatus which, except for the sharp teeth uuder the cheeks, would have passed as a curious species of the subgenus Coelocrabro, for which I took it at first and tried hard to make a new species of it, but at last discovered what it really was. The melanic variety of MegacMle Willughbiella mentioned in the following list is most striking, and all the examples taken were similarly coloured ; the collection also contains a very dark Bomb us Smithianus £ of quite different coloration to any I have seen before. Perhaps the rarest species taken was Golletes montanus, which hitherto has only been recorded from Irvine, in Scotland. Formica fusca, Linn., Parknasilla, nest, 3.8.01 ; Valentia I., nest with winged sexes, 2.8.01. Lasius niger, Linn., Waterville, nest witli winged sexes, 2.8.01, Parknasilla, nest under stones with winged sexes, 2.7-01, Kenmare, nest under stones with winged sexes, 5.7.01 ; Jiavus, De G., Waterville, nest with winged sexes, 3.8.01, Parknasilla, nest under stones with winged sexes, 13.7.01. Myrmica rubra (race ruginodis), Linn., Waterville, nest under stones with winged sexes, 3.8.01, Parknasilla, nest under stones with winged sexes, 13.7.01. Fompilus plumbeus, Fab., Waterville, Caragh Lake, Glonbeigh, 5.7 — 17.8.01. Fassalcecus monilicornis, Dhlb., 1 $ ,(var. black labrum), Caragh Lake, 20.8.01* Oorytes mystaceus, Linn., 1 Parknasilla, Cloonee, Glengariff, Ken- mare, 19.6 — 24.7.01; trimarginatus, Zett., 3 $ , 6 $, Parknasilla, Loo Bridge, Glengariff, Kenmare, Caragh Lake, Valentia, Ardgowan, 18.6 — 20.8.01 ; parietinus, Linn., 2 £ , 1 9 , Kenmare and Glengariff, 19.6-7.7.01 ; sinuatus, Fab., 1 $ , 2 ? , Kenmare, Loo Bridge, Glengariff, 24.6 — 6.7.01. Colletes succinctus, Linn., 11 $ , 1 ? , Valentia, Dooks, Glenbeigh, Waterville, Caragh Lake, Loo Bridge, 27.7—20.8.01 ; montanus, Mor., 9 Glengariff, Kenmare, Parknasilla, Cloonee, Waterville, Loo Bridge, Caragh Lake, 15.6 — 1.9.01 ; " Bombylius hovering over holes," Kenmare, 10.7.01 ; cylindricus, Fab., 1 £ , Caragh Lake, 14.8.01 ; albipes, Kirb., 1 $ , 12 9 > Glengariff, Loo Bridge, Kenmare, Caragh Lake, Cloonee, Waterville, 10.6—14.8.01 ; villosulus, Kirb., Glengariff, Kenmare, 13—27.6.01 ; punctatissinius, Schk., 1 £ , 2 £ , Glengariff, Kenmare, 15.6 — 26.8.01 ; nitidiusculus, Kirb., 2 (J, 5 9 , Kenmare, Valentia, 27.6 — 10.8.01; "Bombylius hovering over holes, apparently throwing off eggs with a jerk," Kenmare, 27.6.01 ; temulorum, Linn., 1 9 , Kenmare, 27.6.01 ; Jeucopus, Kirb., 1 9 > Kenmare, 30.6.01. Andrena albicans, Kirb., 1 9 , Glengariff, 19.6.01 ; f neat a, Smith, 4 $ , 6 ? , Glengariff, Kenmare, Loo Bridge, Parknasilla, 16.6 — 15.7.01 ; Gwynana, Kirb., 1 Kenmare, 27.6.01 ; minutula, Kirb., 4 9 i Kenmare, Glengariff, Cloonee, 16.6 — 3.7.01 . Nomada alternate, Kirb., 9 , Glengariff, 16.6.01 ; Roberjeotiana, Pz., 2 9 . Waterville, 27.7.01; solidaginis, Pz., 3 Kenmare, Glengariff 18.6—1.9.01, 1 Kenmare Glengariff, Parknasilla, 12.6—10.8.01. Cheysidid^;. Chrysis ignita, L., Darrynane, Valentia, 31.7 — 3.8.01. Tentiiredinid.&:. Abia sericea, L., 3 <$ , 3 9 > Kenmare, Glencar, Parknasilla, Caragh Lake, 4.7 — 26.8.01 ; candens, Konow, 1 9 > Darrynane, 31.7.01. Trichiosoma Latreillei, Leach, 1 9 > Parknasilla, 13.7.' '1. Tenthredopsis Coqueberti, Kl., 1 9 > Kenmare, 30.6.01. Tenthredo atra, L., Glengariff, 16.6.01. Allantus arcnatus, Forst., Waterville, 27.7.01. ICHNETJMONID^:. Ccelichneumon derasus, Wesrn., 9 > Loo Bridge, 29.6.01 ; deliratorius, Linn, S , Glengariff, 13.6.01 ; sarcitorius, Linn., Kenmare, 9 > 4.7.01. Melanichneumon monostagon, Grav., Bui. Ac Brux., 1853, p. 303 ; Berth. Ann. Soc. Ft., 1896, p. 306 ; ? , Parknasilla, 14.7.01 ; Obs. Ab P. alticola, Grav., differt : corpore nitidiore, metathorace paulo breviore et minus scabro, abdominis seqmento primo, sicut et sequentibus, nitido et vel ruguloso vet saepius eonfertim punctata, hujus postpetiolo paulo latiore. Scutellum interdum album purum. New to our Fauna. Trogus lutorius, Fab., 9 > Caragh Lake, 20.8.01. Platylabus dimidiatus, Grav., 9 > Caragh Lake, 14.8.01; nigricollis, Wesm. 9, Kenmare, 2.7.01. Colpognathus celerator, Grav., 9 > Kenmare, 7.7.01. Spilocryptus ornattis, Grav., 2 9," bred from Zygcena filipendulce ?. Puparium 1902.] 55 found Parknasilla loth July ; emerged 4th and 7th August." Obs. : the accom- panying cocoons arc bright flavous, and, I think, those of Z. trifolii, Esp. Ptectooryptus citrous, Sohr., = rufipes, Grav, $ .Parknasilla, 22.7.01 ; arrogans, Qrr&y., >*" S. eximia, 6 , wing. 58 [March, gebogen ;" but his description is far too vague, as he does not even state if the seutellum is denticulate. Rondani's Sph. curvina must also be very closely allied, or it may even have been a dwarfed and immature specimen of S. eximia. Neither of these species has been recognised since the descriptions were published, and as I considered it necessary to have this very distinct species in the British List for the benefit of future collectors, I describe it as new, and point out the possible synonymy. Limosina Halidayi, n. sp., $ ? . Like L. lutosa, but of a lighter colour ; the face, pleura? and legs being of a light soft, almost silvery, grey. Male with the first three joints of the hind tarsi gradually decreasing in length and size, the third joint being very small, fourth slender and nearly as long as the first three together, and the fifth about half the length of the fourth. Genitalia very distinct from that of L. lutosa. Female with the hind tarsi simple, and with only soft hairs on the hind trochanters. Head of the same shape as that of L. lutosa ; face, cheeks and jowls light grey, the face with a yellowish tinge. Thorax light greyish-brown, with bristles as in L. lutosa; acrostichal bristles very inconspicuous : seutellum eight bristled. Abdomen with a decided glaucous tinge, bristly at. the sides and round the remarkable genitalia of the male. Legs with the posterior coxa) and trochanters (more or less), the knees and the tarsi (particularly the whole of the middle and the basal joint of the front tarsi), pale ; bristles as in L. lutosa ; the rela- tive lengths of the joints of the hind tarsi in the male are, however, very different (fig. 3), and there are also more of the stubby bristles (and these are longer behind) on the hind trochanters of the male. Wings (fig. 4) as in L. lutosa. Halteres pale yellow. This species is very distinct in the male by its remarkable hind tarsi; it is difficult to separate the female from that of L. Intosa, but the lighter colour and the absence of any stubby bristles on the hind trochanters in my species suffice to iden- tify it. Length, 2£ — 2| mm. This is a mud loving species, of which I have taken about twenty Fig. 3. L. Halidayi, 6 ■ Left hind leg. Fig. 4. L. Halidayi. l».,,1.r,,.r,iif"'fl" knob Fig- 6. L.mirubilis. 6. Wing. Length, 1 — 1£ mm. This species was taken by Mr. Verrall on his stable window, here, "*%»•*, 60 [March, in April, 1S96, and he noticed the extraordinary spine on the hind tibia?, and placed the species in his collection under the MS. name mirnbilis. I have also taken it here, and at Kirtling, in April, May, June and July, but it seems to be commonest in April. I know of no described species with the above characters, and it seems hardly possible that any student of this group could have overlooked the peculiar spine on the hind tibia?. Sussex Lodge, Newmarket : January, 1902. AN AUSTRALIAN SPECIES OF MICBOPTERYGIDJE. BY E. METRTCK, B.A., F.Z.S. No species of the Family Micropten/gidce, so interesting from its highly primitive character, has hitherto been recorded from Australia, nor have I ever previously obtained one, though I now possess over 2000 species of Tineina from that region. On the other hand from New Zealand, with 230 Tineina, I know of nine species of Micro- pteri/qidce ; and as these latter are, from their invisibility in flight, especially likely to be overlooked, no doubt more remain to be dis- covered. The present species is nearly allied to a New Zealand one ; and as there is a sufficiency of biological evidence to indicate a former land connection between Queensland and the northern extremity of New Zealand by way of New Caledonia, it seems refisonable to con- clude that the close relationship of Palceomicra calliplaca from Queensland and P. zonodoxa from the north of New Zealand points in the same direction, and (from the figures quoted above) that their place of origin is properly New Zealand. PALiEOMICRA CALLIPLACA, n. Sf. g 9 • 7 — 8 mm. Neuration as in P. zonodoxa, but vein seven of fore-wings to apex. Head ferruginous. Palpi pale oehreous. Antennno dark grey, with basal pale ferruginous band. Thorax whitish-yellow. Abdomen dark grey. Anterior and middle legs whitish-oehreous, apex of joints black ; posterior legs dark grey, apex of joints whitish-oehreous. Fore-wings suboblong, costa bent near base, thence gently arched, apex acute, ternien extremely obliquely rounded ; bright deep purple ; an elongate pale brassy-yellow median basal spot, extending to one-fifth ; a rather narrow, straight, pale brassy-yellow fascia before middle ; apical third strewn with pale brassy-yellow scales, sometimes forming a defined costal dot at two-thirds ; cilia dark grey, round apex oehreous-white except at base. Hind-wings rather dark grey, lighter anteriorly, sometimes purplish-tinged ; cilia grey. Eight specimens received from Dr. A. J. Turner, who took the 19033 61 species in plenty on Mount Tambourine, 20 miles south of Brisbaue, Queensland, in November and December. The bill is covered with luxuriant tropical forest, and amongst this be found P. calliplqca in great numbers resting on the flowers or a small shrub (Claoxylon oust rale, one of the Euphorbia cece) ; it seemed strictly confined to this plant, but considering the known habits of the group, the moths were probably feeding on the flowers, and the food- plant of the larva' would be something quite different. Elmswood, Marlborough : January, 1902. DESCRIPTIONS OF ORIENTAL LIMNICRINI (COLEOPTERA, F AM. B YR R RLDM) . BY D. SHARP, M.A., M.B., F.li.S. When studying the Central American Limnichini for the Biologia Centrali Americana, I found that 1 must establish several new genera, and 1 was very much surprised, on comparing the Oriental forms in my collection with those from the New World, to find that there was an extreme similarity. Nevertheless, on investigating the structural characters it seems that most of the Oriental forms will be placed in genera different from those of the New World, and I here establish two new genera for the eastern forms. One of the eastern species I cannot, however, distinguish from Gyphonichus, a Central American genus. Although the Limnichini are amongst the most neglected of the Goleoptera, they prove to be of considerable interest. The arrange- ments of minor structural [joints so as to facilitate the perfect packing together of the limbs when " feigning death " are really remarkable. Extremely few exotics forms have yet been described, though it is now evident that the subfamily is rather richly represented in tropical regions. The Munich Catalogue of Coleoptera enumerates only two species as occurring outside Europe and North America. I have re- cently described some twenty or thirty Central American forms, and the descriptions 1 now make of some Oriental allies will prevent its being supposed that the subfamily is absent from the eastern tropics. The two exotic species listed in the Munich Catalogue are from Tasmania and the Cape Verde Islands. The genus Ersachus, placed by Erichson in Limnichini, and since quite lost sight of, must be removed to the family Parnidce. 62 [March, Mandersia, n. g. Antenna ad basin rigidee; articulis quatuor ultimis fl-agellum fragil- issimum facientibus. Tibice intermedia et posteriores subtus et intus longius el latins dcpfanatcE. Presternum haud sulcatum. Although the number of joints in the antennae is somewhat uncertain, this genus is nevertheless readily distinguished by the structure of these organs, the basal joints forming a closely compacted mass, while the four terminal joints are so loosely connected that the slightest touch disconnects them. These terminal four joints are similar in size one to the other, each almost spherical but the last one with an acuminate tip ; they are setose. Next to these four joints are three others closely connected, and in one aspect looking as though they were only one, the first of these three joints is short, not lunger than broad, while the last of them is longer than broad ; nearer to the base is a very long joint, which perhaps consists of two joints soldered together ; the basal joint is very short and thick, and almost com- pletely concealed by the epistome. Supposing the tlagelhun in my examples to be perfect, and the elongate joint to be really two-jointed, this makes the antenna; to be ten-jointed. They are not drawn into the thorax with the head when this is retracted. The application of the head to the prosternum is very perfect, and the deplanation of the tibiae to permit of perfect adaptation to the femora, when re- tracted, is greater than im any other form. The eyes are laterally placed, and of the peculiar Limnichus form. The other characters that I can see are such as are characteristic of the group. I have named this curious genus iu houour of Surgeon-Major .Neville Mauders, who twelve or fifteen years ago discovered it in the Shan States, as well as a number of other interesting insects. The genus may at present be placed near Physemus Lee, from which it differs totally in the loosely articulated flagellum of the antenna). MaNOKKSIA SOYMNOIOES, il. Sp. Ovalis, nigra, (/riseu-pubesvens, anteuuis pedib usque rufis ; subtiliter, minus dense punctata. Long., 3 mm. Thorax strongly transverse ; the anterior angles much depressed, so as to clasp the retracted head ; the anterior margin sinuate on each side so as to allow the antenna} to be directed upwards when the head is retracted; base very closely applied to the elytra, a little lobed in the middle ; finely punctate, pubescent. Eyes concealed when the head is retracted, behind obliquely truncate and straight, in front rounded, not emarginate. Scutellum moderately large, forming an equilateral triangle. Elytra rather finely and sparingly punctate, shining, except that the copious pubescence much conceals the surface ; towards the sides with distant larger punctures serially placed. Under-surface piceous, pubescent, finely punctate. Legs sordid red. Hab, : Shan States {Mauders). Two specimens only were met with of this interesting little insect. 1902.] 63 Caccothryptus, n. gen. Corpus ovale, compete turn, setosum. Antenna; fragile*, haud clavata, ll-articulata, articulis secundo tertioque elongatis subeequalibus, secundo pendulum deplanato, parum discrete curvato. Caput ad retractionem in thoraecm satis adaptation. This genus lias an extreme resemblance in appearance and in most of its cha- racters to the Central American Enthryptus, but it differs in the eyes being largely visible from above, in the elongate third joint of the antenna?, and in the greater width of the ligula and maxillary palpi. Although the exposure of the eyes, and the fact that the head is only imperfectly retractile, differentiate the genus from the normal Lhnnichini, yet I think there can be no doubt that it belongs lo that subfamily. The mode of packing the legs and the structure of the hind femora are those characteristic of, if not absolutely peculiar to, the Limnichini. The pro- sternum is large, somewhat pendant in the middle in front, and its broad process fits very accurately into the mesosternal cavity. The middle cox® are widely se- parated. The first ventral segment is rather short, so that the trochanters are but little distant from its hind margin. The hind coxae are flattened and dilated in front, so that the portion received into the coxal groove is very different in plane, in sculpture, as well as in clothing, from the part that remains exposed when the limb is contracted. Caccothrtptus compactus, n. sp. Ovalis, sat eonvexus, niger, via- subanescens, pube Jlavo-grisescente macu- latim vestitus ; elylris fortitev irregulariter punctatis ; antennis pedihusque fuscis, sub/la veseentibus, tarsis rufis. Long., 4g mm. Antennae slender, rather long, very loosely articulated and fragile, second joint long and slender, slightly longer than the third, terminal joint just perceptibly broader than the preceding one. Head densely and finely punctured, setose. Thorax strongly transverse, continuous in outline with the elytra, closely and finely but somewhat irregularly punctured, pubescent. Elytra with very numerous large and deep punctures, not arranged in regular series, though an imperfect seriation exists ; rather densely pubescent, the pubescence arranged and coloured so as to give rise to a faint spotted appearance. Rob. : S. E. Borneo, Martapura (Doherty). This is the largest and most remarkable of the Limnichini. Ctphonichus orientalis, n. sp. Ovalis, eonvexus, nigerrhnus,pube erecta fusco-griseseente vestitus, par ee punctatus, nitidus, pedibus rufis; antennis fusco-rufis . Long., 3 mm. Antennae very slender and fragile, each joint longer than broad ; the terminal joint a little longer than the preceding one. Thorax much narrowed in front, bi- sinuate at the base on each side in adaptation to the form of the elytra, finely, rather sparingly punctate, shining, although rather densely pubescent. Elytra shining, sparingly punctate, the punctures very fine, but on the basal part with larger punctures subseriately arranged. The pubescence is rather abundant, sub- erect, dark in colour though not black, and not at all maculate. Q4s [March, Hab. : 8. E. Borneo, Martapura (Doherty). This species is so extremely like the Central American C. vestitus that the two might readily pass for one and the same. C. orientalis is, however, more convex and shining, the punctuation is more definite and easily appreciated, and the sinuatiou of the base of the thorax is deeper. Cambridge : February, 1902. NOTES ON SOME COLEOPTERA OF THE BRENT VALLEY, 190L BY W. E. SHARP. The season which has just closed lias been the reverse of a favourable one for the (Joleopterist A year witliout a spring, and in which winter carried well into April, was succeeded by a hot and exceptionally dry summer, concluded by a cold short autumn, has presented a succession of conditions singularly adverse to the abundant distribution and increase of beetle life. Still, to the working Coleopterist, no season or locality is quite unproductive, and during last April I was able to take for the first time a number of species of llydradephaga and Palpicornia from some ponds close to the course of the river Brent. As Prof. T. Hudson Beare^ in a recent number of this Magazine (Ent. Mo. Mag., vol. xxxvii, p. 280), has noted most of these, it will be unnecessary here to recapitulate them. To his list, however, should be added as denizens of these waters, Anaccena bipuslulata, Berosus luridus, and B. signaticoUis. These ponds, in which such species as Copelatus agilis, Hydroporus granularis, and all the common Pkilhydri, were unusually abundant in May, had become completely dry by the end of June, and remained absolutely waterless till quite the end of October. I shall note with some curiosity what effect a drought so prolonged will have on the beetle population in the ensuing spring. Near the Brent river are many orchards and market gardens ; here heaps of vegetable refuse accumulate towards the close of summer. These heaps during autumn and on mild winter days swarm with the commoner, and maintain a scattered population of some of the less frequent, Coleoptera. From such heaps I took last year Celia silphoides, Medon melanocephalus, Stilicus fragilis, Copro- philus striatulus, Hapalaraa pygmaa, lleterothops dissimilis, Philonthus quit- quiliarius, Ulster 12-striatus, and Carpophilus hemipterus, the last an unexpected resident in such a nidus. Anthicus antherinus was abundant in the late autumn, while Tachinus subterraneus, Negarthrus depressus, and hosts of common Staphy- linidce, were in immense abundance under the bark of elder near the ground. In this orchard in November Prognatha quadricornis was common. A little marsh of an acre or two in extent close to the river has provided me with a few species worth noting. At grass-roots in the winter, Pterostichus minor was abundant, and tStenolophus vespertinus, rare j here I also took Bryaxis im- pressa, Calodera alhiops, Stenus melanopus, Evcesthelus laviusculus, and 3Jyllcena intermedia (?), and in June swept Corymbites tessellatus from the reeds, and Strophosomus faber, Telephones thoracicus, and on one occasion Atomaria linearis in immense multitudes, from the surrounding herbage. 1902.] 65 Near this marsh is a row of pollard willows, many partially or wholly rotten. In one of these I was fortunate in faking, in June, three specimens of Opi/o mollis, as well as Dorcatoma chrysomelina ; Melanotus rujipes and Leiopus nebulosus also occurred here during the summer. From a decayed oak post hard by I was very pleased to extract the rare Lyctus brunneus. In this district, but nearer Southall. are many deserted brickfields. Here, on heaps of loose rubbish, grows the yellow melilot (Melilotus officinalis), and the ground is carpeted with Matricaria inodora. From the former I swept Tyckius meliloti in abundance, and at its roots found the variable Sitones meliloti not rarely, but searched in vain for the Apion attached to that plant, while, from the Matricaria, Pseudostyphlus pilumnus was to be swept without difficulty. A few years ago the Brent river for some miles of its course must have been a pretty enough stream " with many a silvery water break above the golden gravel," but it had an ugly trick of sudden flood after winter rains, and since the drowning of a wayfarer in one of these risings, its banks have been annually straightened, the bed deepened, and the bars of sand and gravel all cleared away. Such operations are of course much to the detriment of its riparian Coleoptera, and I can only note a few of the common Bembidia as at all abundant there. I took, however, one specimen of B. obliquum on a little patch of shingle, and on the mud more commonly Tachyusa jlavitarsis, T. concolor, and Trogophlceus elongatulus. Alliaria officinalis still grows abundantly on its banks, and from its flowers in April were swept Ceuthorrhynchus alliaria, C. constrictus, C. rugulosus, and C. melanostictus. If you follow the upward course of the stream for a few miles you arrive at its source, the artificial lake of Hendon. Here, in a little swampy meadow beneath the great south wall of the reservoir, I'oophagus sisymbrii was common in June, and I also took Ceuthorrhynchus cochlearice, Telephorus lateralis, and Litodactylus leucogaster. The banks of this lake are a well-known locality for several local Coleoptera, but they are difficult to work when the water is low, as it was all last summer. On the single occasion on which I visited them with my friend, Mr. E. C. Bcdwell, we took only one specimen of Chlwnius nigricornis, but found Bembidium Jlavo- maculatum, B. lampros, var. velox, B. bipunctatum, and Stenolophus vespertinus fairly common, Heterocerus Icevigatus abundant, and took a few specimens each of Philonthus atratus and Actobius procerulus. " Ledsham," Hanwell, W. : January, 1902. Tachys paroulus, Dej., in the New Forest. — A specimen of this rarity was taken last June by my friend Mr. H. Heasler on some sphagnum, on the edge of a wet low-lying piece of land just beyond Emery Down, Lyndhurst. It occurred in company with Cryptobium and other common bog insects. This is an interesting capture, as the insect has hitherto only been taken on the coast in this country (i. e., at Wallasey, Ent. Mo. Mag., xxii, 43, and at Fortscatho, Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxiii, 213). The species is, however, by no means confined to the coast on the F QQ [March, continent, since Bedel says (Col. Bassin de la Seine, 151) that it is found on the margins of ponds under refuse, and in the earth at the roots of heather, banks of rivers, and in sandpits. — E. A. Newbeey, 12, Churchill Road, N.W. Lasiosomus enervis, ZT.-6'., near Doddington, Kent. — Mr. Saunders has detected this rare bug amongst some insects taken by me last summer near here. I regret to say I did not know it at first sight (see Saunders' Hemiptera-Heteroptera, p. 92), or possibly I might have taken more, and I cannot say exactly when or how I came across it. — Arthuk J. Chitty, Huntingfield, Faversham Kent : Dec. '60th, 1901. Pentatoma fuscispina on the North, Essex Coast. — On August 19th last 1 was fortunate enough to capture a specimen of this rare species on the North Essex Coast. Mr. Saunders, in his "British Hemiptera-Heteroptera," says that only six British examples are known to him, all of which were taken in Devonshire. — Bernard S. Harwood, 94, Station Road, Colchester : February, 19U2. Nomada armata at Colchester. — In June, 1901, I captured five or six examples of the rare Nomada armata near Colchester, together with both sexes of Andrena Hattorjiana. One $ of the latter was a fine specimen of the red banded variety. N. armata had not previously been taken in Essex, and the red form of A. Hattor- jiana had not been seen since 1887. — Id. Papilio Machaon at Chippenham Fen. — Mr. Dale, in his " Historical Notes on Papilio Machaon " (pp. 37 and 38 ante) says, " it is still common in Wicken Fen, Cambridgeshire, but not in Chippenham Fen, only a few miles away." Although I have never seen the perfect insect in Chippenham Fen it must occur there, as the larvas have been taken feeding on Angelica sylvestris. The milk parsley (Peuceda- num palustre), the ordinary food plant of Machaon in Wicken Fen and in the Norfolk Fens, does not occur at Chippenham. — H. Goss, Surbiton : February, 1902. Abundance of Dasypolia templi near Halifax. — When I first began to take an interest in Entomology forty years ago this insect was apparently scarce, and very difficult to obtain in any condition, and a perfect specimen was a great rarity. At that time its food plant was unknown, and its only known haunt was at the bottom of stone heaps on the sides of the high roads, which were placed there pending the repair of the road. Mr. Porritt, in his List of Yorkshire Lepidoptera, writes, " Our County has always been considered head-quarters for this moth, and by far the majority of cabinets in the country have been supplied with specimens from the South-West Riding, in some parts of which it is very common." A man who was a good and ardent entomologist, James Varley, and who lived at Almondbury Bank, near Huddersfield, spent much time in the winter months in turning over stone heaps, and was often successful in getting the imago during its hibernation. Some years ago the Halifax Town Council extended the radius of their Borough boundary, and consequently the lighting of their roads, and I soon found that these lights had at- tractions for the insect, and I could take a dozen or so during the months of Octo- 1902.] G7 bor and November, but it was only by walking a long distance in very cold weather. About six years ago, however, I happened to walk that way during the daylight, and I naturally looked about as I went, and found one on a lamp post, and more on the ground near to it, and I was not long in coming to the conclusion that it waa not necessary to travel the road at night to get specimens, and that there were more of them and much easier to take in broad daylight. During the last two months I have taken upwards of 50 specimens in this way. On two occasions I have come across such numbers about one lamp (10 to 12) as to lead me to think they had been " assembling." Can it be that occasionally odd ones hibernate before pairing ? — Edward Halliday, Akroydon, Halifax, Yorks: December 12th, 1901. Larvee of Sphinx conrolvuli in Northumberland. — Will you allow me to chronicle what I believe to be an absolutely unprecedented occurrence. Mr. John Proudlock, a young collector, though not a very young man, residing near Morpeth, Northumberland, had some strange larvre sent him from a place called Boiling Well, near Seaton Sluice, in the same county. Much interested in them for their size and beauty, he went down himself to search for more. They had been taken on a garden hedge, and he soon found there were plenty of them. Counting two or three that had been crushed by the servant girl, as " nasty crawly things," the total capture was between 50 and 60. A specimen, and a spray of the food plant (which proved to be Convolvulus sepium) were sent to me for identification. The larva sent me was unfortunately crushed in the post, but was easily identified. All the others fed well and all went to earth, but unfortunately did not produce the perfect insects. At my request he has dug up the pupae. All are dead, and some decayed and broken up, but sufficient remains were found, including one complete pupa, and the loop-like trunk-case of another, to render certain the identification. Each had formed a large smooth cavity in the earth, some seven inches deep, others deepor, to one foot. — JonN E. Eobson, Hartlepool : January, 1002. Note on the egg laying of Nonagria sparganii. — Though quite young larva? of this species were long ago described and figured by the late William Buckler, nothing, T believe, was then known of the eggs, or where they were laid. It may, therefore be worth while to record that a batch of eggs came under my observation in September, 1899. These were laid — much as those of N. typhee are — all glued down firmly (in single file), in a groove formed by the involute edge of a leaf blade of Iris pseud-acoru.i. The cement was visible, shining like gum arabic, and so stuck down the margin, that as it withered and turned brown, the eggs were almost con- cealed. They were very small for the size of the moth — of a spherical shape, with much flattened poles, and even a slight hollow at the top, very finely striated, the colour being of a very light brown, thus assimilating wonderfully to the brown leaf during the winter. They did not hatch till the 11th and 12th of May, 1900, when the young larva? very soon commenced mining the leaves of the Iris, which had been provided for them. From their manner of feeding, but little could be seen of them. Some, however, reached the stage of the smallest figured by Mr. Buckler, and two or three others became nearly full-grown larva?. Probably it will not sur- P 2 68 [March, prise those who have experienced the difficulty of dealing with the larvse of N. sparganii, that none of them reached maturity.— William R. Jeffrey, Ashford : February 12th, 1902. Habits of Lipoptena cervi. — This parasitic Dipteron, attached to deer, was taken here two years ago by W. H. Somerset, flying in plenty, and sometimes set- tling on human beings, on a calm sunny day towards the end of November, on the outskirts of Savernake Forest, which is stocked witli both red and fallow deer, but no deer were very near at the time. The lateness of the season and probably ex- ceptional abundance of the insect seem worthy of record. — E. Meyrick, Elmswood, Marlborough : January 16th, 1902. The efficacy of glacial carbolic acid as a preventive of mildew — a severe test. — On opening the current number of the Magazine, I was much shocked at seeing the announcement of the death of my correspondent, Mr. Lionel de Nieeville. Ii seems but " the other day " that I received a particularly kind and interesting letter from him. Seven years ago he wrote to me in great distress as to his collection of Rhopalocera, in the Indian Museum, Calcutta, which were being ruined by mildew, and asking if I could suggest a remedy for the evil. Amongst other measures, I advised him to try carbolic acid, either in the manner suggested by Dr. Sharp, viz. : " Calvert No. 2." on sponge ; or wool saturated in the glacial acid (melted by heat), and wound round the head of a large pin, until a ball the size of a marble was formed. I do not know who originally suggested this method, but it was the one adopted by Mr. de Nice'ville, who thus wrote about it last summer. " For the three last rainy seasons (15th June to 15th September) I have used the glacial carbolic acid on wool, pinned into the bottom corners of my three hundred boxes, and found that no fresh mould has shown itself, I have applied it only once a year, at the beginning of the rains. Perhaps once again, in the middle, would be a greater security, but in this hot country, and on such work one cannot use a punkah, and as the perspiration literally runs off one's nose and chin into the boxes, the labour and discomfort is so abominable that I have only gone through my boxes once. It has been quite successful." If this treatment is so effective under the trying conditions of an Indian mon- soon it surely ought to suffice to protect our collections in the dampest situations in this country. It may not be so destructive to micro-organisms as Formol, but it has one great advantage over the latter, namely, that green tints are unaffected by it. — H. Q. Knagqs, Folkestone: February \?dh. 1902. A List of British Diptera, 2nd Edition : by G-. H. Verrall, ex-President of the Entomological Society of London. Pp. 47, small 4to. Published by the Author, Sussex Lodge, Newmarket. 1901. The author is to be congratulated in being able to say that the first edition of this List, published in 1888, is exhausted, and also that a new edition is necessary, because since then about 300 species have been added, and moreover there have been some 500 changes in synonymy, &c. He deplores the fact that no young 1902.] 69 worker will take up the Cecidomyidte, but states that the Mycetophilid(F are much improved, though still in a most unfinished condition : the S(ratio)»j/ida> to Cyrtidce are included in the proposed second vol. of " British Flies," and the Chironomida he hopes will form the third. In 1888 only 13 British Fleas were known ; now (due principally to the Hon. N. Rothschild) there are thirty. This new List does not entirely supersede the old one, inasmuch as Pfc. iii (Reputed British species) must still be consulted, Ft. iii of the new List being only a supplement to that of the old one. In get-up the two Lists are practically precisely similar, the only difference being the use of a blacker type for the families in the new List ; the small 4to form (objectionable to some of us) is still retained. We echo the words with which the author concludes his preface. " Let this List quickly give place to another."— R. McL. Insects injurious to Staple Crops : by E. Dwight Sanderson, B.S.Agr., Entomologist to the Delaware Agricultural Experimental Station. Pp. 5 and 295 8vo. New York : John Wiley and Sons; London : Chapman and Hall. 1902. This is a very useful, very cheap, and profusely illustrated book on Economic Entomology, in part a reprint of letters to agricultural journals, &c. A few of the illustrations are original, but the majority are time-honoured reproductions from the pencils of others, Riley and Howard standing out prominently. That they are hard to beat is acknowledged by the fact of their frequent reproduction. The first four chapters are occupied by generalities; then follow grains and grasses, wheat, Indian corn, weevils in grain, clover, cotton, tobacco, potato, sugar-beet, hop-plant, concluding with a very useful summary of insecticides. We recommend this work as a useful addition to the already large library of books on Economic Entomology. Die Phoriden : by Tn. Becker. (Abh. k. k. zool.-bot. G-es. Wien, i, pp. I — 100, pis. I— V). 1901. This work, which forms a Monograph of the European species of Phoridce, is undoubtedly one of considerable merit. Its value is enhanced by the fact that the author has been able to examine and compare the type species in the collections of Meigen, Winthem, v. Roser, Strobl, Zetterstedt, Schiner and Egger ; on pages 69 — 75 he gives a list of these type specimens with notes. The author divides the genus Phora into two groups, and gives most useful tables for the determination of the species. He considers that there are 74 Euro- pean species in the Family, 23 of which he describes as new or re-names. The first three plates mainly represent the differences in venation ; but in the last two E. W Rubsaamen is responsible for some excellent drawings of the geni- talia, including those of what would appear to represent a fourth species of Trineura, but as no other characters could be found to separate it from T. aterrima the author wisely refrains from giving it a name. In the list of species at the end I fail to find P. Carpentieri, Gob. (1877), and P. posticata, Strobl (1898), or P. sanguitiea, Lw., 1870 (Turkestan), and P. setigera, «Lw., 1874 (Sarepta) ; while among the foreign Phoridre I miss the names of P. albidihalteris, Felt, agarici, Lintn. (1895), camariana, Coquerel (1848), Cleg- horni, Big. (1890), navigans, Frauenf. (1867), omnivora, Huds. (1892), and Hiero- nymus pygmceus, Weyenb. (1886). 70 [March, The author is to be congratulated upon the production of a most useful mono- graph, which marks a distinct advance in our knowledge of what was hitherto a somewhat neglected Family of the Diptera.—J. E. Collin. Birmingham Entomological Society: January 20th, 1902. — Mr. If. Willoughby Ellis, Vice-President, in the Chair. Mr. R. C. Bradley exhibited a scries of Hyetodesia vagans. Fall., a species which is not included in Mr. G. II. Vcrrall's recent list of British Diptera, but which is common and well known in Sutton Park ; also a specimen of Sphex plani- pennis taken by Mr. J. T. Fountain in Jersey last year: it is a large and handsome fossor, which is unknown in Britain. Mr. C. J. Wainwright, Rhyssa persuasoria, L., one of our largest, handsomest, and rarest Ichneumonidce taken by Mr. J. T. Fountain in Derbyshire last year ; also a fine series of the Syrphid Tropidia sat a, Harris (milesiforniis, Fall.), taken near Paignton, S. Devon, in a damp meadow by the sea ; it is a species which is common in the fens, but was not known before from the West of England, it is, however, in abundance at this one spot. Mr. H. Wil- loughby Ellis, the following Coleoptera : — Nebria GylJenhali from Matlock ; Pterustichus olJongo-punctatus from Buxton, and Llosoma ovatuhim, var. eollaris, from Knowle. The last named was a form which he said some Coleopterists believed to be only an immaturity, but he had taken it at all times of the year, and many specimens were undoubtedly mature. Mr. Aug. D. Imms, two extreme forms of Satyrus Semele, L., from Wales : one, a very dark and strongly marked indi- vidual, was taken on the slate near Barmouth ; the other, a light bleached-looking but apparently perfect specimen, was taken on limestone near Llandudno. Mr. Imms read a paper upon " The Structure and Distribution of the Collembola," in which he gave a thorough account of the external and internal anatomy, with some account of the embryology ; it was well illustrated with blackboard drawings, and with microscope preparations. — Colbran J. Wainwright, Hon. Sec. Lancashire and Cheshire Entomological Society : The Annual Meeting was held at the Royal Institution, Liverpool, on January 13th, 1902. Mr. R. Wilding, Vice-President, in the Chair. Mr. Fredk. Birch, Joint Secretary, in presenting the Council's Report, gave a short resume of the work of the past session. The Treasurer then read his state- ment, which showed an increased and satisfactory balance to be carried forward. On the motion of Mr. Oulton Harrison, it was resolved that the Report of the Council and Treasurer's Balance Sheet be printed and circulated. The following Officers were then elected to serve during 1902: — President, Mr. S. J. Capper, F.L.S., F.E.S. ; Vice-Presidents, Rev. R. Freeman, M.A., and Dr. H. Dobie ; Secretaries, Messrs. Frederick Birch, and E. J. B. Sopp, F.R.Met. Soc., F.E.S. ; Treasurer, Dr. J. Cotton, F.E.S. ; Librarian, Mr. F. C. Thompson ; Council, Messrs. R. Wilding, F. N. Pierce, F.E.S., A. Tippins, H. Tonkin, and W. A. Tyremau. In the absence of the President, the retiring Vice-President, Mr. R. Wilding, delivered a most interesting Address, reviewing in an exhaustive manner the general 1002.] 71 entomological work of the first year of the century, with special reference to many matters of local importance. The Kev. K. Freeman proposed, and Mr. F. N. Fierce seconded, a vote of thanks to Mr. Wilding, both for his able address and for his valuable services in the chair during the past year, which was heartily accorded, and in response to the unanimously expressed wish of the members present it was resolved that the address be printed and bound in the Annual Report. On the motion of Mr. Sopp, a cordial vote of thanks was also tendered to Mr. Fredk. Birch for his indefatigable labours as Secretary during the past three Sessions. The following exhibits were made during the evening:— Cwlioxys mandibular is, a Hymenopteron new to the British list captured at Wallasey by Mr. Fredk. Birch, who also exhibited on behalf of the Kev. T. B. Fddrup various species of Lepido- ptera sent for distribution among students of the group ; Vanessa c-album taken in the Liverpool district by Mr. G. A. Dunlap ; and Corydia Petiveriana, an attract- ively decorated cockroach from Madras by Mr. Sopp. Monthly Meeting, February 10th, 1902. — Mr. R. Wilding in the Chair. Letters were read from Messrs. B. H. Crabtree and H. Massey with reference to their arrangements in connection with the Society's forthcoming visit to Man- chester. A valuable paper was then read by Mr. Willoughby Gardner, F.L.S., F.R.G.S., F.E.S., on the Life Habits of the Hymenoptera-Aculeata, dealing in a full and complete manner with all that is at present known of the life history of these most useful hexapods. After describing the characteric features of the Order as a whole, he exhaustively reviewed the various families constituting the section Aculeata, the females of which are armed with a retractile sting. Dealing first with the Heterogyna, or social ants, he gave many facts of interest connected with the instinct and economy of these remarkable insects, and mentioned that most of our indigenous species belonged to the family Formicida, or mining ants. He also described the methods pursued by the Fossores in the capture and preservation of their prey. Of the Diploptera, or true wasps, two families are native to Britain, their value on account of their wholesale destruction of Lepidopterous and other injurious larva? being fully discussed. After enumerating the Coleopterous and other inmates of the nests of lespa vulgaris and /'. germanica, the lecturer passed to a consideration of the Anthopkila, or bees, alluding to the great part played in nature by these pollen loving insects in the fertilization of clover and other plants. Having referred to Colletes cunicularia, our " Wallasey Bee," and Cvelioxys man- dibularis, a recent local addition to the British list, the concluding portion of the address was devoted to the life history of Apis mellifica, the common honey bee, in which many interesting, historical, economic, and other matters were ably dealt with. At the close of his paper Mr. Gardner presented his recent monograph on the Hymenoptera-Aculeata of Lancashire and Cheshire to the Library of the Society. A hearty vote of thanks was tendered Mr. Gardner for his interesting paper, and also for his welcome gift ; after which the following exhibits were made : — Bembidium saxatile from Garston, by Mr. F. Birch ; Bembidium stomoides from the River Hodder, by Mr. C. E. Stott ; Tropiphorus tomentosus (Heswall), Berosus ajffinis (Moreton), Heptaulacus villosus and jEgialia rufa (Wallasey), Carcinops 14- striata, &c, by Mr. R. Wilding ; and a pair of the earwig, Pyragra brasiliensis from Espirito Santo, by Mr. E. J. B. Sopp. Mr. G. O. Day, some rare Dutch 72 [March, 1902. books by Sepp, the life-like coloured figures in which were greatly admired. Mr. Oultou Harrison, some excellent life-size photos of Lepidopterous larva- taken direct from nature.— E. J. Burgess Sopp, Hon. Secretary. The South London Entomological and Natural History Society : Jan.. 0th, 1902.— Mr. W. J. Lucas, B.A., F.E.S., Vice-President, in the Chair. Mr. Tonge, Redhill, Surrey, was elected a Member. Mr. Hewitt exhibited a specimen of the rare Homopteron, Cicadetta montana, taken flying in Stubby Copse, New Forest, on July 7th. Mr. R. Adkin, five speci- mens of Melanippe galiata, which emerged on December 8th last, in a cage out- doors, and protected only from rain and direct sunshine ; the ova were laid towards the end of August. Mr. Mac Arthur, specimens of Triphrena comes, bred on Dec- ember 26th and 27th from ova laid in July bj an Isle of Lewis female. Mr. Lucas, slides of particular natural objects in the S.W. district, including the corner of the Black Pond, frequented by the lesser dragon-flies. Mr. Main, slides made by him- self of the larva; of Samia Cecropia, and of Amphidasys betularia ; of the imago of Pieris napi drying its wings after emergence from the adjoining chrysalis case ; and of a batch of ova of Macrothylacia rubi on a sprig of heather. — Hy. J. Turner, lion. Sec. Entomological Society of London : Sixty-Ninth Annual Meeting, Wednesday, January 15th, 1902.— The Rev. Canon W. W. Fowler, M.A., F.L.S., President, in the Chair. After an abstract of the Treasurer's Accounts, showing a large balance in the Society's favour, had been read by Colonel Yerbury, R.A., one of the Auditors, Mr. H. Gross, one of the Secretaries, read the Report of the Council. It was then announced that the following had been elected Officers and Council for the Session 1902—1903. President, The Rev. Canon Fowler, M.A., F.L.S. ; Treasurer, Mr. Robert MeLachlan, F.R.S. ; Secretaries, Mr. Herbert Goss, F.L.S. , and Mr. Henry Rowland-Brown, M.A. ; Librarian, Mr. George C. Champion, F.Z.S. ; and as other members of Council, Mr. R. Adkin, Professor T. Hudson Beare, F.R.S.E., Mr. Arthur J. Chitty, M.A., Mr. W. L. Distant, Mr. F. DuCane Godman, D.C.L., F.R.S., the Rev. Francis D. Morice, M.A., Professor E. B. Poulton, D.Sc, F.R.S. , Mr. Edward Saunders, F.L.S., Dr. David Sharp, M.A., F.R.S., and Colonel C. Swinhoe, M.A., F.L.S. The President announced that he should appoint Dr. F. DuCane Godman, F.R.S., Professor E. B. Poulton, F.R.S., and Dr. D. Sharp, F.R.S., as Vice-Presidents for the Session 1902—1903. The President referred to the losses the Society had sustained during the past Session by the deaths of Mr. C. E. Collins, The Rev. Professor W. P. Dickson, D.D., Dr. H. W. Livett, M.D., Mr. Lionel de Niceville, F.L.S., Miss Eleanor Ormerod, LL.D., and Mr. II. Vivian, M.A. He then delivered an Addi'ess in which he dealt chiefly with the question of Protective Resemblance and Mimicry in the case of the Coleoptera. At the conclusion of the Address, a vote of thanks to the President was proposed by Professor Poulton, seconded by Professor Meldola, and carried. A vote of thanks to the other officers was then proposed by Colonel Swinhoe, seconded by Mr. Distant, and carried. Canon Fowler, Mr. Goss, and Mr. Rowland-Brown replied, and the Proceedings terminated. — H. Goss and H. Rowland-Brown, Hon. Secretaries. April, 1002.1 73 COLEOPTERA AND ACULEATE HYMENOPTERA IN EAST KENT IN 1901. RY ARTHUR J. OIITTTY, M.A., F.E.S. Insects have been by no means abundant during the past spring and summer in the part of East Kent about five miles inland from Faversham and Sittingbourne, and elsewhere around Eaversham, in which T have been able to collect ; but as I have always found to be the case, a few good things not previously noticed in the locality have turned up singly. It is difficult to account for these solitary speci- mens. I have at times thought that the ground where I mostly collect (which I may say is very confined) must be an outlying portion of some district where interesting species abound, but inasmuch as the further afield I go the less I get, I think on the whole that these insects must come from a considerable distance, being carried by winds or otherwise on to the high ground, which runs roughly from Maid- stone to Ashford, and being then unable, owing to too great dryness, to maintain a footing. I had hoped that a wet March like that we had during 1901 would be suitable to Coleoptera, but low temperature prevented this, and the subsequent prolonged drought was very un- favourable, except to beetle pests like Phyllotreta, which of late years have been very troublesome alike to farmers and gardeners, and have this year prevented there being any turnips at all in the county until towards the end of September. I made several spring visits to the Blean Woods for ants' nest beetles, and on one of these I had the good fortune to be accompanied by Mr. Donisthorpe, who has done so much good work in this con- nection ; but I discovered no beetles beyond those already recorded by Mr. J. J. Walker in this Magazine (vol. ix, 2nd series, p. 208), and I was distinctly disappointed in finding neither of the Histerids mentioned by him. Dinarda also was rare, and only secured singly, requiring a great deal of searching. I found it somewhat away from that part of the nest where the ants were thickest. Myrmedonia humeralis, Gr., was abundant on one occasion only. My visit on May llth produced a female of the rare ant, Formi- coocenus nitidulus, Nyl. ; it was taken in a part of a nest of Formica rufa, consisting of old stuff and almost devoid of ants. I have been closely looking out for the insect for some time, and it must I think be rare, but the nests of F. rufa in the Blean Woods are so large and so numerous that it may be overlooked. Except for ants and for those species which either live at peace with them (if there are any G 74 [April, such), or arc protected against their attacks, hardly an insect was to be found in the woods, and I particularly noticed the complete absence of the early spring bees, tbe sallows being absolutely deserted on all occasions. Amongst the ants and ants' nest beetles Mr. Donisthorpe and myself on one occasion were most successful in finding Homceusa acuminata, Mart. I took two specimens of this beetle in the spring of 1894, near Dodington, in cart ruts full of water. Tbis spring, on May 12th, another example turned up in tbe same cart ruts, and search on a bank close by in nests of Lasins niqer and formica fusca, in which I have searched in vain at intervals since 1S94, produced six more individuals curled up in tbe nests. Tbe beetles were lying under stones which covered part of tbe nests, and I think had we been but little later we should have found they bad flown away. Later in the day, when we returned to the spot, the bank was dried up, and beetles and ants had disappeared, and I have seen no signs of ants' nest beetles there since. Mr. Donisthorpe also captured one specimen of Ponera contracta, Latr., of which T bad previously an unnoticed ex- ample from Dodington, and one of Myrmecina Latreillei, Curt., a species I bad taken there before, and I have since found Tetramorium ccespitum, Linn., at no distance from the same place. Clav/ger foveolatus, Mull., occurred in some numbers in a F.flava nest, as well as on another bank half a mile off, near Wychling, the last mentioned locality also producing Atemelcs evnarginatus, Pk., in a nest of Myrmica rufa. These two banks are the only localities in the district which I know for beetles living in the nests of the ground ants. Passing from ants to beetles. Ccenocara bovista*, Hoff., last seen in 1894, has again turned up, one specimen having been swept by me near Greet on May 28th, and on the evening of June 9th I captured a dozen more in a hayfield close by Huntingfield ; they were confined to a very few yards. What I believe to be Mordella aculeata, L., was found on the same day sitting on the white cloth of the luncheon table, probably brought in with guelder-rose flowers. The allied species, Jf. fasciata, F., occurred commonly in August, 1900, on Umbellifers, about a bop field (does the larvae feed on the poles?), and this year was noticed from early in June to the beginning of September. Cryptocephalus 6-punotatus, L. (one on Juno 1st, close to a nest of F. rufa), C. aureolus, Suff. (one on June 9th), and C. bilineatus, L. (one on July 21st, on a bank), were taken, and are the only specimens of these in- sects ever found by me here. A single specimen of Homalo/a elegantula, Bris., was swept on May 18th out of grass, at the point where a path 1902. 75 through a wood joins the road, and a male of Homalota scapularisfi&hlb., occurred at the end of May in a grass field close by, along with a pair of the red variety of Amphicyllis c/Jobus, F. (var. ferrugineus, Sturm). SracTiytarsusfasciatus, "Forst., one specimen beaten out of an Urn- hellifer beneath an elm, this species being new to me. Phytcecia cylindrica, L., occurred in some numbers in long grass by the corner of a copse, and one subsequently by the road side, but I refrained from really searching for this scarce Longicorn. Hedobia impcrialis, L., four specimens beaten or swept singly at some distance from one another, is also new to me here. T failed this year to take either Clytits mysticus, L., of which one specimen occurred last year, or CaUidium alni, L., of which I then took several. Bruclnm cisti, F., and Rhynchites conicus, Illig., occurred in 1900, but were not to be found in 190]. Other beetles to be mentioned are —the variety of Bruchus ato- marius with black legs ; Malachius rnarginellus, 01., two specimens in July, which I think must have been blown or driven by the drought from the Whitstable district, from which it has previously been re- corded ; Conopalpus testaceus, 01., one swept in July in a field which had been allowed to go out of cultivation ; Sister bimaculatus, L., near Eastling Mill, in May ; Silpha littoralis,~L. ; Tropiphorus carinatus, llorbst ; Mordellistena hrwinea,T?.,&\\ taken singly in July ; M. abdo- minalis, F., common in 1900, occurred sparingly ; Metoecus paradoxus, L., one on the windowsill inside my bedroom on September 1st ; Liei- nus depressns, Payk., one running on a path on May 12th. I took a specimen of L. silphoides,\r\ October, 7iear Chatham. Quedius brevis, Er., in the Blean Woods, in ants' nests, always in logs of wood in the nests, September 7th, common. Dytiscus circiimflexus, F. (12), and Hi/drophilus picrus, L. (one <^), September 8th, in a pond in Sheppey, just across Elmley Ferry. In the autumn fungus on decayed ash produced Miicctopliagus piceun, F. HypopTiloeus bicoJor, 01., occurred under bark of dead ash, having evidently bred on fungus growing there. In Sharsted Wood Gis micans, Herbst, turned up in fungus on a fallen birch ; Homalota marcida, Er., occurred in all the localities in which I searched, including Oobham Park ; and Triphyllus puncfatus, F., was widely distributed, but scarce. Passing to Hymcnoptera, bees were scarce here in 1901, but my list of Antliopltila for this district now includes above 100 species. Among the wasps, Calici/rqus hyalinatus, F., and Odt/nerus trimargi- natus, Zett., three specimens on August 26th, on wild mignonette, and G 2 76 [April, O. melanocephalus, Gmel., may be mentioned. The year 1900 was particularly good for the Antliophila, and the following I think have not been recorded by me before. Prosopis cornuta, Sm , dilatata, Kirby, hyalinata, Sm., confusa, Nyl., and brevicornis, Nyl., SpJiecodes rubicundus, V. Hag., pilifrons. Thorns., puncticeps. Thorns., Halictus pauxillus, Schk., Andrena anqustior, Kirby, fucata, Sm., coitana, Kirby, fulvago, Chr. , labial is, Kirby, niveata, Friese, and pi'oxima, Kirby, Megachile Wilhu/libiella, Kirby, and versicolor, Sm., Chelostoma flori- somne, L., Osmia fuhniientris, Panz., leucomelana, Kirby, Bombus Latrei- llellns, Kirby, Nomada fucata, Panz., Ccelioxys rufescens, Lep., and acuminata, Nyl. Mr. Norton has taken Andrena ferox, Smith, ? , at Wyehling, this is practically the same locality whence a £ was recorded by me in 189G. T have looked in vain ever since for the ? . It seems to me to occur at a time when the bees get their honey from trees, such as sycamore and chestnut, and accordingly to be very difficult to take. I believe, however, that hawthorn is the recorded food. In concluding I may mention that I had three very successful Saturdays in August at St. Margaret's Bay, and then, thanks to Mr. F. W. Sladen, captured the three British Cilissce and several other specialities. Apion limonii, Kirby, occurred at the roots of its food plant beneath the cliff, and insects generally were more abundant than here. Huntingfield, Faversham, Kent : January 12th, 1902. HISTORICAL NOTES ON LYC.FNA ACIS IN BRITAIN. BY C. W. DALE, F.E.S. This is the rarest and most valuable of our native butterflies, next to Chrysophanus dispar. Like it, it is an extinct British species, as none have been taken in our island for over twenty years, and genuine British specimens are now few and far between. The first account we have of its occurrence is in Ray's Historia Insectorum, 1710, as follows: — " Ala> supina? ad exortuin cceleru- lescunt ; inferius e fusco albicant. Ocelli sex septemve in singulis alis. A. D. Dale, capta nobisque ostensa est." Both Lewiu, in 1795, and Haworth, in 1803, record it as being a very rare British species. But in 1833 the Rev. W. T. Bree wrote, " Acts was at one time considered to be an insect of very great rarity. In 1803 Haworth spoke of it as the rarest, perhaps, of our 1002.] 77 British ' Blues.' Since that period the species has turned up in a variety of situations. Though by no means common, it appears to be widely distributed ; nor is it peculiar tu chalk districts, but seems to delight in woody situations abounding in grass. Probably it may be overlooked on the wing, and passed by for the common Blue." (Loudon's Magazine). In 1862 Mr. E. Newman, in his preface to the Zoologist for that year, wrote, " How shall we account for the disap- pearance of Acis, which at Leominster in 1832 was certainly the most common of all the Blues? I am not aware that a single specimen has been seen in that locality for thirty years. Its food-plant cannot have failed ; its pupa? cannot have been drowned, as water never rests on the hill sides where the insect once abounded ; no fens have been drained ; no common lands enclosed ; no alteration has taken place in the temperature." In 1871 Mr. Hudd wrote in the Ent. Mo. Mag., vol. viii, p. 113, "It is extremely local. The cause of its rarity in the county is, 1 have no doubt, to be found in the fact that the ova and young larva? are destroyed by the haymakers." This certainly is not the reason why acis became extinct at Glanvilles Wootton, as the grass in the meadows which it frequented was cut and the hay carried in exactly the same fashion all through my father's life. In 1864 Mr. Hudson, in the Zoologist, p. 8985, states that, " the meadows at Epworth are of such large extent, and the insect appearing just before the grass is ready for the mower, a proper search for the larva is thus prevented." The extinction is certainly not due to over collecting, and the larva? and pupa? have never been seen in our country. The only reason that occurs to me for it is that, for some unexplainable reason, too great an abundance of their natural enemies, the Hymenopterous parasites, took place, probably of the genus Apanteles. Acis has occurred in the following counties : — Yorkshire. — Taken by T. W. Watson (Haworth's Lep. Brit., 1803). Lincolnshire. — In meadows near Epworth. I have always found it between July 10th and 25th, S. Hudson, 1864 (Zoologist, vol. xxii, p. 8985). Cambridgeshire. — One specimen by J. C. Dale at Gamlingay on July 16th, 1819. In plenty on the Gogniagog Hills by II. Denny in 1833. In Madingley Wood, but not common, by J. F. Stephens (Ent. Mag., vol. i, p. 528). Cherry Hinton, Lawston, and chalk pits near Cambridge, many years ago, F. Bond. Formerly common in the county, but has not been taken for the last ten years, T. Brown (Newman's Butterflies, 1871). Papworth Everard, a bad one, early in August, 1857, and a very good one on June 20th, 1858, C. A. Beadan (Intelligencer, vol. iv, p. 141). Norfolk. — By J. Burrell (Haworth's Lep. Brit., 1808). 78 [April, Essex.— In Young England for 1860 is a notice that one had been taken in Epping Forest, but of tliis capture Mr. lluckett states that he lias very grave doubts (Zoologist, vol. xxi, p. 8601). Kent. — Cuxton, twenty-live years ago (1871), Tutt (Brit. Butterflies, p. 166). Sussex. — Lewes, II. T. Stainton (Ent. Trans., 1858—61, vol. v, p. 231). Surrey.— Windlesham Heath, Rev. Dr. Abbott, on July 16th, 1878. Suffolk. — Foxhall Heath, one specimen, on June 24th, 1861. G-. Garrett (Bloomfield's Lepidoptera of Suffolk). HAMPSHIBE. — Brockenhurst, Mr. G. Samouelle. Near Ringwood, T. Vine, in 1830. Dorsetshire.— Parley Copse, T. Vine, on May 28tb, 1833. Hazlebury Bryan Lodcr. Powerstock, J. C. Dale, on June 27th, 1816. It was. common at Glan- villes Wootton in 1808, onco recorded in 1811, one in 1812, common in 1813, 1814, 1815 (one being taken as late as August 1st), and 1816, scarce in 1817 and 1818, common in 1819, 1820, and 1821, scarce in 1822 and 1823, common in 1825 (twenty specimens on June 13th), scarce in 1828, 1829, 1830, and 1831, common in 1834 and 1835, one only seen in 1836, a few in 1837, none recorded in 1S38, scarce in 1839 and 1840, in 1841 a pair on Juno 19th, which were the last ever seen in Dorsetshire. I found them both on clialky places or on one hill called Dungeon, and also amongst long grass in meadows, especially in a field called Millett's Long Ground (J. 0. Dale's Ent. Journal). Somersetshire. — Lewin, in his Insects of Great Britain, states, " that in the last week of August, 1793, he took two or three flying in a pasture field at the bottom of a hill near Bath, that they were much wasted, and appeared to have been long on the wing. Wiltshire. — Amesbury, Mr. Edwards, prior to 1840. Warwickshire. — The Rev. W. T. Brec writes, in Loudon's Magazine, vol. vi, p. 191 : " On June 28th, 1804, I took a single female in an open plantation by the side of Coleshill Park. I have an example also of the same sex captured by a village shoemaker in another part of Warwickshire, I believe in the vicinity of Birmingham, and a collector at Coventry lias several which he took some years ago in the neighbourhood of that city." Leicestershire. — One near Hinckley, on July 15th, 1812, Rev. W. T. Bree (Loudon's Magazine, vol. vi, p. 191). Worcestershire. — One by a friend near Dudley, in 1802 (Loudon's Mag., vol. vi, p. 191). Gloucestershire. — Two at Lower Guiting, on the Cotswolds, by the Rev. J. Greene, in the beginning of July, 1849 (Zoologist, vol. x, p. 3494) ; has been met with at Stinchcombe and on the Breakheart Hills near Woofton-under-Edge, V. R. Perkins (Newman's Butterflies, 1871). Herefordshire.— " I took five specimens in one of my father's meadows, called the ' Horse Leasow,' at Olden Barn, four miles from Leominster, on June 20th 1832 ; four of them were females, and only one a male. I have repeatedly seen it since, and my nephew has taken two specimens, but many years ago " (E. Newman, in his British Butterflies, 1871). In the preface to the Zoologist for 1862 i9o2.] 79 he says, " that at Leominster in 1832 acis was certainly the most common of all the Blues ; and that he is not aware of a single specimen being seen in that locality for thirty years. Monmouthshire. — " I have taken one specimen at St. Julian's," G. Loch (Newman's Butterflies). Glamorganshire.— " In 1835, 1836, and 1837, 1 could take acis in plenty, but have never taken it since," T. Parry, of Merthyr (Entomologists' Weekly Intelli- gencer, 18E9, vol. vi, p. 28). Croegid, near Llantrissant, rare, Evan John. " I have seen but not taken Glamorganshire specimens," J. T. Llewelyn (Newman's Butler- flies). " Of this rare species, in June, 1871, 1 was fortunate in capturing six speci- mens, four of which were in first-rate condition," A. E. Hudd (Ent. Mo. Mag., vol. viii, p. 113). " On June 4th I had the pleasure of taking one male specimen of Lycrena Acis at Penarth, near Cardiff. Last year I captured eight males and tw0 females, A. F. Langley, June 10th, 1875 (Entomologist, vol. viii, p. 161). From Cardiff comes the welcome news that this scarce butterfly was taken in 1874, again in 1875, and twelve specimens in 1876 ; twenty-eight specimens in all" (Entomo- logist, vol. x, p. 5). Six specimens were taken at the same place in 1877 (Entomologist, vol. xi, p. 104). These are the last that have been recorded from there. Pembrokeshire. — " In company with the Rev.C. T. Cruttwell 1 was fortunate in capturing a specimen of this rare butterfly, flying over thyme, at Tenby," W. Edwards (Entomologist, vol. xvi, p. 210 [1883]). This capture is doubted by Mr. Barrett in his recent work on British Butterflies. Addendum. — " Lyccena Acis in Sussex. I have in my collection a specimen caught, by my friend, Mr. T. C. Hedley in the White Fields, Abbott's Wood, in July, 1881. I saw the insect caught, so that I am sure of its authenticity," J. A. Dynes, Eastbourne, 1883 (Entomologist, vol. xvi, p. 135). Glanvilles Wootton : December, 1901. COLEOPEORA MILVIPENNIS, Zeller, NEW TO BRITAIN. BY C. O. BAKRETT, F.E.S. I have been tnuch interested lately in examining a lovely littde Coleophora reared by my old friend Mr. W. C. Boyd. He was shooting near Danbury, Essex, in October, 1900, when his attention was claimed by very white blotched mines in leaves of blackthorn (Prunus spinosa). After some search two cases were secured, and were afterwards sleeved out in his garden, upon plum, for the winter. They were then not full grown, but fed up in the following spring, and produced one moth in 1901. This moth agrees in size, and in part in colour, so nearly with C. badiipennella, that it remained without further ex- amination until now. In the collection of the late Professor Frey, at South Kensington, I find three specimens of C. milvipennis, Zell., which agree in all respects with this example with the utmost accu- racy. The case also agrees, but with this one discrepancy. Prof. Prey's cases are from birch, and birch is given as the food plant by 80 [April, Zeller, and by Sorhagen, A. Schtnid, and Hofmann, though Frey himself says, in 1856, that it feuds on deciduous trees, and in 1880 mentions birch only. H is a remarkably straight, slender and pointed case; and I feel no doubt whatever that those found by Mr. Boyd are of the same species. This little moth is of the size of G. badiipennella, expanse about 4 lines (8 mm.), antennae rather long, beautifully annulated with browu and clear white ; fore-wings pale yellow at the base, the colour regularly and softly shading darker outward until it becomes of a rich ochreous, or pale golden-fulvous, in the hinder area ; without markings, and having the costa of the colour of the rest of the wing ; cilia similar. Hind-wings glossy, pale grey, with long silvery-white cilia ; abdomen dark brown ; legs long, pale brown. This is an interesting addition to the British fauna. Tremont, Peckhani Rye, S.E. : March lith, 1902. PSEUDOPHLCEUS WALTLII., B.S., A SPECIES NEW TO THE BRITISH FAUNA, &c., BY 11 . J . IIIOULKSS. On August 5th last, at West Walton, Norfolk, while searching at the roots of grass in a very dry place, I obtained a Coreid Bug, which did not exactly answer the description of any of our species. I therefore sent it to Mr. Edward Saunders, and he has been kind enough to name it for me as Pseudophloeus Waltlii, H.-S., a well-known Continental species, but not previously recorded from Britain. He points out that the difference in the third antennal joint, which widens and is black at the apex, will at once distinguish it from P. Fallcnii, also that the scutellum is carinated only at the apex, and the autennary tubercles are pointed instead of obtuse as in Fallcnii. The patch of dry grass mentioned above produced, in addition to the Pseudophloeus Waltlii, the following bugs, which may be worth recording : a dead and broken specimen of Coreus denticulatus, a species only once before recorded from Norfolk, Berytus crassipes and B. minor, Aphanus lynceus, Coranus subapterus and Nabis boops. The following species also, have recently occurred in my garden at Norwich, Podops inuncta, Heteroy aster urticce and Therapha hyoscyami. This last is a very interesting capture, as it was taken in Norfolk by Paget many years ago, but has since been recorded in this country from the South Western counties only. " Corfe," College Road, Norwich : March 5th, 1902. 1802.] gl NEW CORSICAN AND FRENCH MICRO-LEPIDOPTEBA. BY THE RT. HON. LOUD WALSINGHAM, M.A., LL.D., P.R.S., Ac. {Continued from Vol XXXVII, p. 184). 335. HOLCOPOGON, Stgr. n. syn. = Cyrnia, Wlsm. Holcopogon, Stgr., Hur. Soc. Ent. Ross., XV, 330-1 (1879); Stgr.and Rbl., Cat. Lp. Pal., 11, 160, No. 335 (1901). Cyrnia, Wlsm , Ent. Mo. .Mag., XXXVI, 218-9 (1900); Stgr. and Rbl., Cat. Ip. Pal., II, 201, No. 3Mbis (1901). 2979. Holcopocon bubulcellus, Stgr. n. syn. =3011bia barbata, Wlsin. Hypsolophus bubulcellus, Stgr., Stett. Ent. Ztg., XX, 215, No. 96 (1859). Ypsolvphus pulverellus, Cnst., Ann. Soc. Ent. Er., XXXI V (4 s., V: 1805), 191—2, PI. II, 5 (1865). Uolcopoyon bubulcella, Stgr., lior. Soc. Ent. Ross., XV, 330 -1 (1879) ; H. bubulcellus, Stgr. and Rbl, Cat, Lp. Pal., II, 160, No. 2979 (1901). Cyrnia barbata, Wlsm., Ent. Mo. Mag., XXXVI, 219, No. 2177 (2) (1900) ; Stgr. and Rbl., Cat. Lp. Pal., II, 264, No. 301tbis (1901). I regret to find that by an unfortunate error the description of Cyrnia barbata, Wlsm., MS., has appeared in print. These descrip- tions were intended to be suppressed, but having slipped in among those of other Corsican species sent for publication, my attention was not called to the oversight until my return from abroad. The genus was not regarded as sufficiently distinct from iLolcopoijon, Stgr., differing only in my two specimens having veins 3 and 4 of the hind- wings connate, whereas they are normally separate in Holcopogon heloeolellus, Stgr. The suspicion that barbata was identical with bubulcdlus, Stgr., which I had not then recognised, is now confirmed. (To be continued). NOTE ON OSMIA MANIC ATA, Morice, WITH DESCRIPTION OF THE FEMALE. BY THE REV. F. B. MORICE, M.A., F. E.S. The Osmia, whose £ 1 described in Trans. Ent. Soc, London, 1901, Part 11, under the name of manicata appears to be widely dis- tributed over the Mediterranean regions. 1 have now taken its £ <§ in Algeria and South Italy (Taranto), both sexes in Corfu, Zante, West and East Greece (Oly mpia, Attica), and $ ? apparently belonging to the same species at Smyrna. 82 LAprfi, I am sure as to the ? V from Greece, one of them having been taken actually in copula. Those from Smyrna, so far as I can see, are exactly similar. In all, I have eight specimens, which 1 should call manicata ? . They are most vexatiously like adunca, lJz. — in fact, after a prolonged and minute comparison of the two species, the only distinguishing ? characters I can find are the following — Manicata is larger (14 — 17 mill, long, and at least 4 mill, wide) ; its hind calcaria are completely red ; there is a more clearly defined rugose triangle at the extreme base of the propodeum ; its general style of puncturation is a little stronger than that of adunca — not so shallow, and in some places closer ; especially it may be noticed that on the mesonotum near the teguhe the punctures in adunca become almost remote, and the surface in consequence shines a little, whereas in manicata the whole mesonotum is covered with close reticulate punctures, making it look quite dull : also in manicata the tegulae themselves show pretty distinct fine punc- tures almost all over, while in adunca the greater part of their surface is impunctate. Neither in the clypeus, the antenna', the legs, the wings, nor even in the last ventral segment (usually so helpful in discriminating ? 9 of this group) can 1 find any substantial difference between adunca and manicata. The pilosity, fimbriation of the abdominal segments, etc., seems quite identical, and both species have the shining, comparatively naked abdominal surface, by which adunca is so easily dis- tinguished from ctBmentaria, Lepelletieri, etc. The characters given above are, it must be owned, not altogether satisfactory, and if the g $ differed no more than the ? ? , one might well hesitate as to separating the two as distinct species. But the 6th ventral segment in manicata g is so utterly unlike that in adunca, that it is really impossible to unite them. I find its peculiarities abso- lutely constant in the numerous specimens which 1 have now- examined, and have nothing to add to or subtract from the account I gave of them in the Transactions (I. c). There can be little doubt that many specimens of manicata occur in South-European collections under the name of adunca. It is curious that in 1901 Dr. Schmiedeknecht and myself, while collecting in Greece and the Ionian Islands, found no specimens of adunca at all ! — all the Osmice of that group that we obtained were either manicata or pallicornis, Friese (= difformis, Duck e, nee Perez). But as soon as I crossed to South Italy, I found adunca everywhere, while manicata only re-appeared at Tarauto, and pallicornis was nowhere to be found. Urunswick, Woking : February, 1902. t0o2.] 83 Macropis labiata, Pz., and fulvipes, F. — In Friese's new volume (VI) of " Apidaa Europsjce," the above insects are separated by differences of colour, punc- turafion, etc., but the author expresses some doubt whether they ought really to be considered as distinct species. Having examined their J genitalia with this question in view, 1 find a difference which seems to me quite strong enough to be specific. In both, the stipes has a long bilobed apical process or '; lacinia," but the outer of the two lobes of this process is shaped very differently in the two species. In fulvipes it lias a simple subtriangular form, with nearly straight, gently converging sides and a rounded apex. But in labiata it is so strongly and abruptly dilated inwards at the apex as to be almost Unciform. The difference is quite apparent with a hand-lens of low power ; as viewed under the compound microscope it is more than apparent — striking ! (The inner lobes differ also somewhat — that in labiata being wider. But this character is by no means so noticeable as that given above, so I do not dwell upon it). The species are undoubtedly very closely allied ; but I think we cannot do wrong to keep them apart, according to our present ideas as to what constitutes a species. My specimens of Macropis are mostly English or Swiss. The English ones are all labiata ; the Swiss comprise both species — labiata from Sierre, and fulvipes from the Bois des Freres, near Geneva. Both occurred on Lysimachia, and I never thought I had more than one species in my collection, till I tested it by Friese's synoptic tables in the new volume. — E. 1). Mouice, Brunswick, Woking : February, 1902. Hedychrum rutilans, Dhb.,and Hedychrum fervidum, Smith, nee F. — Professor Poulton has lately been good enough to send me for examination the whole of the British Chrysids in the "Hope" (Oxford) Collection. I was rather disappointed to find that it contained nothing new to our British List ; but there was one insect which, had I seen it a few months earlier, would have been so. This was a $ of Hedychrum rutilans, Dhb., tbe species of which I recorded the first British capture known to me (at Lyndhurst, by Miss Ethel Chawner), in the Eut. Mo. Mag. of last October (1901). The insect bore two old labels, one naming it " Hedychrum fervidum," the other giving as locality and captor " Wandsworth, W. S. (sic) Saunders." This was probably due to a slip of the pen, W. W. Saunders being no doubt intended. The label was not in Mr. Saunders's handwriting, and his son (Mr. E. Saunders) who has seen the specimen thinks that the pin was not one likely to have been used by his father — still, of course it may have been re-pinned. If it was really received from Mr. Wilson Saunders a curious result follows. So far as I know, four British collections only (the British Museum, the Hope, Dr. Mason's, and my own) contain each a single specimen professing to represent the insect described by Shuckard, Smith, &c, under the name " Hedychrum fervi- dum." Of these, three arc really varieties (all different) of Holopyga gloriosa, ¥., while the fourth is a Hedychrum rutilans. Not one of them is the true " fervidum," or rather, "fervida," viz., Holopyga fervida, E., which apparently does not occur in this country at all. All four specimens can be traced probably, and my own, cer- tainly, to Mr. Wilson Saunders's collection, and he alone is recorded (vide Shuckard) as having captured " Hedychrum fervidum" in this country. 84 APril. Mr. Marshall's Catalogue gives "rutilans" as a synonym for Smith's "fervidum," as I mentioned in my first paper in the Ent. Mo. Mag. on British Chrysids. I then supposed this to be a simple mistake, since all the then claimants to the name "fervidum " belonged to Holopyga gloriosa, with which "rutilans," a true Hedychrum, had no sort of connection, nor even resemblance. But, if he was going by the Hope collection specimen, his identification was perfectly correct, as far as that example was concerned, though not so as to the other insects described as fervidum by British authors. Since there is now no doubt that rutilans is a real British species and still occurs here, it is to be hoped that gloriosa may yet be rediscovered, and the shadow of doubt that still remains on the subject of its claim to be considered a native be removed. — Id. : March 8th, 1902. Sirex gigas, L,, at llitchin (Herts) and Merton (Norfolk). — This species used to be brought to me occasionally at Hit-chin, but the specimens were almost certainly imported. The late Frank Latch more observed that those which occurred in his shop were bred from bundles of Ore-wood. I once dug a large number of males out of a flr-trunk at Merton, and have occasionally seen the female on the wing, but there is a large timber yard at Brandon, and foreign Ore-wood is sold everywhere. Foreign timber and Ore-wood undoubtedly introduce this species every year, and probably the majority of specimens observed are not actually British. If the species has any real claim to be regarded as autochthonous, specimens with an entirely British ancestry must form a very small minority. Sires ju venous, L., at llitchin (Herts). — This species was decidedly rare at Hitchin ; one of my specimens was taken in his shop by the late Frank Latehmore - this was undoubtedly introduced in the same way as S. gigas, and I do not regard any of my specimens as truly British. — J. Hartley Dckbant, Merton Hall : February 26th, 1902. Notes on Diptera in the New Forest during 1'JOl. — From my own experience the season was not a good one, for although the weather, at the time of my visits, was favourable, Diptera were scarce, and the strong winds which generally prevailed made collecting them difficult. The season was also erratic, as what Spring there was came even later than in l'JUO, but by the end of May it was forwarder than usual, and only became normal about August, by which time many species I expected to find, were apparently over. Quality, however, somewhat made up for quantity, and in addition to the four Psilota anthracina, Mg., two Focota ap ij arm is, Schrk., and three Lophosia fasciata, Mg., already reported, I took one Leptomorphus Walkeri, Curt., two Flatyura atrata, F. ?, one V. fasciata, Ltr., one Bibio ctavipes, Mg., one Ftychoptera contaminata, L., three Asilus crabroniformis, L., Empis nigritarsis, Mg. (com.), six Flatypera hirticeps, Verr. (all ? ? ), Platychirus discimanus, Lw., (common on sallows), four Fyrophama granditarsa Forst.,one Crysuchlamys ruftcornis, F., two Callicera cenea, ¥., one Zodion cinereum, F., four Oncomyia atra, F., three tStomphasticafava, Mg.,one Neottiophitum praustum, Mg., Urophora were taken on broom. Last year, on August 12th, I took at St. Margaret's Bay, under the Cliff, a specimen of Paragus bicolor, a Syrphid fly, which appears, from Mr. Verrall'a book, hitherto to have been known as British from very few examples, but which I feel sure was abundant at St. Margaret's Bay. The porrected antenna?, which are well represented by the illustration in Mr. Verrall'a book, seem remarka- ble in the group of Syrphida in which Paragus occurs.— ARTn PR J. Chitty, 27, Hereford Square, S.W. : March 12///, 1902. Icerya seychellarum (Westwood), in S. Africa. — Mr. C. Fuller has sent me examples of this species (new to S. Africa) on rose and Ficus, collected in Natal. It also occurs on native plants, and is more likely to be a native of S. Africa than of the Seychelles or Mauritius. Mr. Pergande, of Washington, has also examined specimens, and agrees with me that theCoccid is true/, seychellarum. It is a pretty thing, with yellow and white secretion, and radiating glassy filaments. The insect from Lagos, described by me as a subspecies of /. seychellarum, is clearly a valid species (Icerya albolutea). — T. D. A. Cockereld, E. Las Vegas, N. Mexico: March, 1902. Fiorinia Sulcii, Newstead, in France. — Dr. P. Marchal has fust sent me this species, collected in Dordogne, April 19th, 1901, on Pinus. It is, so far as I know, new to the fauna of France.*— Id. Bamboo Coccids in Algeria. — Dr. P. Marchal sends me some Coccids crowded on Bambusa spinosa, marked " Jardin d'Essai du Ham ma, Alger," January 26th, 1901. They consist of two species, Odonaspis secretus (Ckll.) var Oreenii, Ckll., and My (Hasp is bambitsicola, Ckll. The first was described from Ceylon, the other from Brazil ! — Id. Strachia picta probably imported with fruit. — On November 30th last, Mr. A. Mason, of Brundall, sent me a very fine red and black bug, which he took crawling in his dining room, near some plates of dessert, consisting of bananas, grapes, &c. It is similar to Strachia festiva, but much larger. Mr. Edward Saunders has again assisted me, and writes as follows : — " It is Strachia sp., very like picta, and possibly a form of that species. Under the circumstances, I should say it was probably introduced from the Canaries. It is not a species likely to occur here." The insect was alive and quite active when it came into my possession. — H. J. Ttiofless "Corfe," College Road, Norwich : March 5th, 1902. Salda C-album, Fieb., and vestita, D. and S.— Among a large number of Salda C -album sent to me for examination by Mr. Geo. B. Boutledge, were three or four specimens of vestita, D. and S. Upon enquiry I find that they were all taken at one spot on the banks of the Irthing, near Edmond Castle. Salda saltatoria did not occur at all, the only other species being scotica, Curt. I have before received C-album and vestita from Mr. Routledge taken together * Also new to France is fliaspis zamiie, Morgan, found by Dr. Marchal on Cycas in a hothouse : but this is not a native species. 1902.] 87 elsewhere, and think these facts are a very strong confirmation of Dr. Renter's opinion that iiestita is the developed form of ('-album. — E. A. Newbery, 12, Churchill Road, N.W. : March Uth, 1902. [The above note contains very strong evidence in favour of Salda vestila being the developed form of C-album. I have always been against this association, on account of the very different appearance of the elytra in the two forms ; in vestita these are dull all over, ami there is an absence of the velvety black patches observable in C-album, as well as of the whiter markings, and notably of the little round white spot near the apex of the corium ; the sides of the pronotum are also more rounded. I feel, however, that Dr. Renter's views have turned out correct, and that in future iiestita should be treated as the macropterous form of C-album in our lists. — Edward Saunders.] A few Odonata from the Chamonix Valley. — As very little has been published concerning the Dragon-flies of the Mont Blanc district, it may be of use to enume- rate six species taken at Chamonix (over 3200 feet) by in}' friend Mr. R. W. Lloyd between July 15th to 27th, 1901 : — Sympetrum striolatum, Clip. ; Orthetrum brunneum, Fonsc., apparently very common ; JEsch. cyanea, Mull. ; Calopteryx splendens, Harris ; Pyrrhosoma nym- phula. Sulz. ; Agrion merruriale, Clip. — ■ R. McLachlan, Lewisham, London : February 23rd, 1902. Sphinx convolvuli, L., at Merlon (Norfolk), 1901.— On September 20th, 1901, Lord Walsingham's gardener brought me a specimen of convolvuli which he had caught in a greenhouse in the garden here. Although I have never taken this species myself, I have not regarded it as a rare species — boys used to bring me specimens at Hitchin, and Lord Walsingham and myself saw several specimens flying round a high electric light at the Colonial Exhibition at South Kensington. — John Hartley Durhant, Merton Hall, Thetford : February 25th, 1902. Papilio machaon, L., at Fly in 1881. — On June 16th, 1881, I saw a specimen of machaon at Ely, near the stone wall in the meadow beyond the Vineyard. It flew over the wall, much to my disgust, and did not return, although I waited for it for hours. I need hardly add that this was the first time I had seen a real live Swallow-tail! I am aware that the Rev. Gr. H. Raynor tried to establish machaon at the Rosewell Pits, Ely, in 1881, having assisted him in collecting ova at Wicken, but my Swallow-tail had no connection with these ova, the earliest of which, accor- ding to my notes, were collected June 24th, 1881.— Id. : February 25th, 1902. The hibernating stage of Coremia didymata, L. — In part lxxxviii of Mr. Barrett's " Lepidopfera of the British Islands," just to hand to-day, the author remarks (p. 177) that he " can obtain no information as to the young state of this larva, but it must surely hatch from the egg in autumn— probably August," &c. I am able to supply the missing information : ova laid on August 10th, 1899, hatched on February 26th, 1900, and I have at the present time apparently healthy hiber- nating ova which were deposited on July 21st, 1901.— Louis B. Prout, 246, Richmond Road, N.E. : March 1th, 1902. 88 r April, A Correction — Blaps similis, Ltr., = Blaps *mortisaga, Dr»t., Fnt. Mo. Mag., XXI, 112 (1884) nee. L. — The record of the occurrence of Maps mortisaga at Hitchin, was founded on two specimens brought to me alive July 22nd, 1884. These appeared to differ from B. similis, which I had taken freely at Pirton, in the greater extension of the ends of the elytra, and were determined for me by a friend as B. mortisaga. This identification was probably more or less casual, but T was younger then, and accepted it without question. I did not become acquainted with the error of determination until some years later. Blaps mortisaga, L., does not occur at Hitchin, Herts. — J. Hartley Durrani, Merton Hall : Feb. 27th, 1002. Crgptophilus integer, lleer, in London. — I have long had a specimen of this inconspicuous Clavicorn beetle in my collection, brought me with Mezium and other insects from a London warehouse. It is very like a small, pallid Cryptophagus, with the sides of the thorax acutely margined, but not toothed, and the entire upper surface delicately punctured and pubescent, the punctures on the elytra subsorially arranged. As the insect is likely to become spread by commerce, it is worth while calling attention to its occurrence alive in London, though the species cannot, of course, be introduced into the British list. It has been recorded from many localities in Europe, including Switzerland, the Tyrol, the Balearic Islands, &c, and I have specimens sent me by Mr. J. J. Walker, from Corfu, Cephalonia, and Malta. In the last European Catalogue the genus is referred to the Tel matophil idee. — G. C. Champion, Horsell, Woking : March 1st, 1902. Note on " Lathrobinm atripatpe." — Mr. Thompson has just sent me for verification a specimen of a Lathrohium from High Moors, Yorkshire, that agrees with the individual on which I introduced L. atripalpe, Scriba, as a British species. I have always felt doubt as to whether the insect was really what Scriba had in view, and I see that Ganglbauer considers Scriba's L. atripalpe to be a variety of L. terminatum. This my " atripalpe " certainly is not, and it seems possible that it is an undescribed species. I notice that in one of my examples the elytra are quite black, but in another, and in Mr. Thompson's specimen, they are piceous — giving rise to the suspicion that the insect may be a dark form of some species with red elytra. The insect is at present rare to an extent that is quite surprising, and it would be well to wait for more information before attempting a final conclusion on the matter, though the existence of an unnamed species in the British list seems rather an anomaly now-a-days. — D. Sharp, Cambridge : Feb. 19th, 1902. Carbolic Acid as a preventive of mildew, and preserver of collections. — I have had experience of the use of this substance in collections of insects, extending now over 25 years. During that period I have several times received applications from residents in the tropics requesting me to inform them how they could protect their collections from destruction. I have always recommended carbolic acid, and it has always proved successful. I have tried several other methods I have seen recom- mended, and though some of them are more or less useful, no one of them is at all equal to Carbolic Acid. I find the glacial acid is not so good as the impure acid. Calvert's No. 5 answers all the purposes best, and is not dear. 1902. j Si) The mode of application. Get small Turkey sponges, with as few large passages in them as can be found. Cut them into cubes, or oblongs, each about half a cubic inch in size, and pin each cube into the box by means of two long and strong pins. Take care that the sponge is isolated from everything except the pins. Then apply the carbolic acid to the sponge by means of an ordinary pipette, putting as much on the sponge as it will hold without risk of dripping. The carbolic has no injurious influence on the colour of the insects, so long as it does not actually touch them. It is, I think, advantageous as regards greasing, and it is as efficacious against insect destroyers as it is against mould. Various devices have been tried as to placing the carbolic in small vessels. But none of these have proved successful. The sponge method is the best. The draw- back to it is the risk of dripping of tbe carbolic from the sponge. This may be rendered unimportant by using the lid of a small cardbox as a saucer. The pins carrying the sponge also carry this saucer. A small interval should separate the sponge from the saucer. I may add that if collections are infested with Insects, it is best before using the carbolic acid, to kill the pests by some agent. Benzine is the best. This should be put on the sponges in the same way as the carbolic. The box should then be closed and left for a fortnight, when another application of benzine may be made, if the boxes are badly infected. If this is used, the carbolic may be put on the sponges three or four days after the second application of the benzine. With regard to the question how long the carbolic acid acts as a preservative, 1 may say that this depends on a number of details. When it is first used in a collection, I advise a second application to be made in about three months. If the collection has been in a very bad state, it will be some time before the destroyers completely disappear, and consequently the frequency of renewal must depend on this, on the climate, on the nature of the boxes, etc. But after the carbolic has been renewed two or three times, the intervals between its application may be extended to one, two or three years. Although 1 have not experimented much with it, I am disposed to entertain the opinion that the vapour of carbolic acid may be a valuable adjunct in rearing insects in confinement, especially when they have to be kept for some time. They are, in such cases, frequently killed by mould. If galls and such objects are placed in vessels with some of the crystalline carbolic acid, so that none of the acid touches the galls, I have found the insects emerge very freely. If the insects are very small, it is desirable to put in the receptable a small vessel con- taining some water. The reason for this being that the carbolic acid seems to exercise a peculiar influence in keeping the air very dry. — Id., Cambridge : March 1st, 1902. The Victoria History of the Counties of England : a History of Surrey. Insecta, edited by Herbert Gross, F.L.S., &c, pp. 1U2, folio. London : A Constable and Co., Limited. 1902. In this Magazine for November, 1900, we called attention to the publication of the first of the Counties, viz., Hampshire, and gave a brief notice of the scope of the intended work and its difficulties. Surrey is now before us, and the Insecta H 90 [April, occupy over 100 pages. No doubt Surrey is one of the most favoured, as well as one of the best-worked counties, but if this occupation of space by the Insecta is to be continued at the same rate we think there will be a revolution at head-quarters ; and yet whole and important groups (e. g., parasitic Hymenoptera) are omitted altogether. All concerned seem to have done their work well ; at any rate, as well as is possible for a task imposed at very short notice. All is very unequal (as was remarked for Hampshire), and we do not see how this is to be avoided. Much of it is in what may be called " narrative " form ; much (such as Hymenoptera, Coleo- ptera, Micro-Lepidoptera, &c.) consisting of only lists with localities. There have been many isolated county catalogues of certain Orders of insects ; never before has the subject been handled in so comprehensive a manner. Genera Insectorum : First fascicule {Coleoptera), by Dr. M. Rkgimbart. Pp. 12, and 1 plate. 4to. Bruxelles : P. Wytsman. 1902. The first fascicule of the Coleoptera (presumably of Part 1) of this work is devoted to the Gyrinidce, which the author divided into three tribes and nine genera, the characters of the latter being shown on a beautifully drawn plate. After each genus a list of the species and their habitat is given, 356 being the total number for the whole family, and out of these 81 belong to Orectochilus, and 77 to Gyrinus. If all the families of the Insecta were as well defined as the Gyrinidce, and each had a specialist at work on it, there would be some hope of this gigantic undertaking being completed in the course of time. — G. C. C. Birmingham Entomological Society: February 17th, 1002. — Annual Meeting. — Mr. G. T. Eethune-Baeek, President, in the Chair. The Thirteenth Annual Report of the Council was read, and the Treasurer's Report presented, showing a slight balance in the Society's favour. The following Officers were elected for the ensuing year :— President, Mr. G. H. Kenrick, F.E.S. ; Vice-President, Mr. G. T. Bethune-Baker, F.L.S., F.E.S. ; Treasurer, Mr. R. C. Bradley ; Librarian, Mr. A. II. Martineau, F.E.S. ; and Sec- retary, Mr. C. J. Wain wright, F.E.S. The following were also elected to the Council : Messrs. H. VVilloughby Ellis, F.E.S., J. T. Fountain, W. Harrison, and G. W. Wynn. Mr. A. Imms exhibited, by means of a lantern, a series of microscopic prepara- tions of the Colleinbola, including specimens of typical species and sections, &c. Mr. J. T. Fountain, a series of Selenia bilunaria, Esp. (illunaria, lib.), of different broods, including a series bred, June to August, of vav.juliaria, Haw., and others bred, November to March, all of the spring form. Mr. A. H. Martineau, Hymeno- ptera taken at Budleigh Salterton, 3. Devon, at beginning of August last year, including Andrena pilipes, F., and A. thoracica, F., both from bramble blooms; Astatus boops, Schr., taken at blossoms of gorse ; Andrena deuticulata, Kirb., Nomada fucata, Panz., Dasypoda hirtipes, Latr., Hedychridium ruseum, Rossi, the parasite of Astatus boops, and Trypoxylon Jiyulus, Smith, its cells were found in sand instead of the more usual wooden posts. — Colbean J. Wainwbight, Hon. See. 1902.] 91 Tite South London Entomological and Natural ITistort Society : Annual Meeting. -January 9th, 1902. — Mr. F. Noad Clark, Vice-President, in the Chair. The Twenty-Ninth Annual Report was read, and shewed that the Society was in a very satisfactory condition, both in membership and finances, and had carried on witli much success its educational and scientific work. The present number of members is 174, and the Balance Sheet shewed a very fair balance, with no liabilities. The following is a list of the Officers and Council elected for the ensuing year : — President, F. Noad Clark ; Vice-Presidents, H. S. Fremlin, M.R.C.S., F.E.S., and E. Step, F.L.S. ; Treasurer, T. W. Hall, F.E.S. ; Librarian, H. A. Sauze ; Curator, W. West ; Hon. Secretaries, Stanley Edwards, F.L.S., F.E.S. , and Hy. J. Turner, F.E.S. ; Council, W. J. Ashdown, J. H. Carpenter, F.E.S., T. A. Chapman, M.D., F.E.S., A. Harrison, F.C.S., F.L.S., W. J. Lucas, B.A., F.E.S., H. Main, B.Sc., F.E.S., and J. W. Tutt, F.E.S. There was no Address from the retiring President, owing to his having met with a very serious accident. A vote of sincere condolence and of hearty best wishes for his speedy recovery was unanimously passed. Mr. R. Adkin exhibited a long series of Acidalia aversata, and read notes on their life-history and variation. Mr. Garrett, a living specimen of Dasychira pudi- bunda, which had just emerged in the open. Dr. Chapman, forms illustrative of the geographical races in Spain and Switzerland of the butterflies Polyommatus Corydon, Lyccena Damon, and L. Hylas. February 13th, 1002.— Mr. F. Noad Clark, President, in the Chair. Mr. South exhibited a specimen of Cydimon (Urania) leilus, from St. Kitts, one of the Leeward group of the West Indies. It is a common species along the northern coast of S. America, and in Trinidad, but has not hitherto been taken in this island. Mr. MeArthur, some specimens of Eupoecilia gilricomana, taken forty years ago by Mr. Standish, and stated that the species had not since been obtained in this country. Mr. H. Moore, an exceedingly fine specimen of the Orthopteron Lanar imperialis, from Sylhet, in N. India. Dr. Chapman, specimens of Hypotia corticalis, from the Riviera, a species having some of the characters of the genera Pyralinus and Phycitinns, and for which he had proposed a new genus. Rev. F. P. Perry, a large number of CoJeoptera from the Transvaal and Orange Colony, taken by himself during a short residence in S. Africa. February 27th, 1902.— The President in the Chair. Mr. South exhibited a specimen of Macaria liturata from Delamere Forest. It was a very dark variety, and had recently been described as var. nigro-fuhata ; it was apparently an unknown form on the continent. Mr. MeArthur, an example of Agrotis segetum, having a narrow, very dark, marginal band on each of the hind- wings, the white ground colour and fringes making it of a very conspicuous character. Mr. Edwards, an unusually large and perfect nest of Vespa vulgaris, obtained near Rochester in a hollow tree. Dr. Chapman, specimens of Crinopteryx familieUa, bred from larva ; it. belonged to the lower section of the Adelida, and lived in cases like the Coleophorce, to which it had no structural relation whatever. Mr. R. Adkin, long bred series of Acidalia marginepunctata, and read a paper on them, entitled, H 2 92 [APril> " A Life-cycle of Acidalia marg inepunctata." A discussion ensued, when it was pointed out that the genus certainly required subdivision, both on account of di- versity of structure and distinction of habit. — Hy. Turner, Hon. Sec. Entomological Society of London: February 5/7*, 1902. — The Rev. Canon W. W. Fowler, M.A., F.L.S., President, in the Chair. Dr. Norman Joy, of Bradfield, near Reading, was elected a Fellow of the Society. Professor Poulton exhibited with lantern a series of slides belonging to Professor Meldola, made from actual specimens by the three-colour process, illus- trative of mimicry in British and exotic Lepidoplera and Hymenoptera. lie also exhibited the several specimens from which the lantern-slides had been prepared. Mr. C. G. Barrett, a series of the perfect insect of Olottttla fusca, Hpsn., together with ears of maize (locally called mealies), showing the damage done by the well-grown larva of the species, which lives in the first place in the stem, eating the pith from the ground, and afterwards attacking the cobs, and eating from the inside into the bases of the unripe grains which then change colour and shrivel up. He also exhibited: Gynaniza maia, duplicate boxes. Had he examined even a few, he would have recognised this one as typical — not only typical of Crinopteryx, but also purely Neo-Lepidopterous. Then there is his Fig. 12, which he figures as the ordinary neuration of Crinopteryx. I have never met with this. But further, it looks to me to be an entirely impossible neuration, except as a monstrosity. In examining the tracheae in the pupal state, of many species, and I have just looked over a number of photographs of these, and have referred to Dr. Spuler's ' Dissertation," 1892, to confirm my memory, one finds that the vein Dr. Spuler marks in Fig 12 and Fig. 13 as II 4 and 5, is most certainly III l, and that his 111 i, of Fig. 12 is an impossible vein, and must therefore be an accidental fold of wing membrane, made in preparing the specimen. Whether it be a monstrosity or be an accident in preparing the specimen, it is difficult to understand how Dr. Spuler took it for the ordinary form in Crinopteryx, which it certainly is not, whatever else it may be. Paucity of material, one again guesses. His Fig. 13 is still more difficult to accept. It is confessedly drawn from a fragment of wing, how broken not stated, and is like nothing neurational T ever heard of. I am forced to conclude that, having inadequate material, Dr. Spuler made some erroneous observations, and incautiously accepted them. The neuration of the hind-wing of Crinopteryx is of an ordinary Neo-Lepidopterous type. Nor is there any reason to believe it varies in (or reverts to) the direction of a Palreo-Lepidopterous form, more often than that of any other species, that is, practically, not at all. Generally the pupa is identical with that of Incurvaria, and agrees even to considerable detail. Compared with muscalella the head and mouth parts are identical. The Neo-Lepidopterous character of the fixity of terminal segments is very definite in both. The general spiculation of surface is the same ; the circum- spiracular bristles are more preserved in muscalella; the dorsal arma- ture is of the same character, but much reduced in muscalella, and is wanting on 2nd abdominal, but other evidence that this segment is fixed is no stronger in one pupa than the other. Muscalella has much more solid chitine, and as a result the appendages retain their positions after dehiscence, with more solidity, that they are however, free from the body and from each other, is shown in the empty pupa case by the case of the hiud-wing being as 1902.] 101 strong and as obvious throughout its whole extent as that of the fore- wing. In this respect it is more primitive than that of familiella. The pupal differences are not sufficient to give subfamily rank, hardly even generic. The position of Grinopteryx is at about the same level as Incurvaria, The structure of the pupa shows it to be almost at the same level, possibly rather below Incurvaria, the second abdominal segment being perhaps a little less fixed. The loss of sundry bristles is not very definitive,butis an advance. Thestructure of the ovipositor is distinctly further removed from that of Eriocrania than that of Incurvaria is. The neuration suggests that though parallel, they are not on the same line of development, the want of loop to lb. shows this, and perhaps points to higher development. In the Adelidce (roughly equal to Dr. Spuler's Tinece AcuJeatce in which however he places Nepticula and Tischeria, and some others, which are not Aculeate). Grinopteryqince as a subfamily would be of position equal to Incurvariance at base of family. The Coleophora habit of the larva is its main claim to subfamily rank, separate from the Incurvariance ; Phylloporiance, Antispilince, and Lamproniadce, would have an inter- mediate position, with Adelidce as the highest group. Grinopteryx would have less claim than Incurvaria to form any sort of link between Adelidce and Eriocraniadce, and though all fairly close, it is as abundantly Neo-Lepidopterous, and as free from any remaining characters of Paheo-Lepidoptera as any of the subfamilies of Adelidx. EXPLANATION OF PLATE II. From Photographs by Mr. F. Noad Clark. Fig. 1— Larva, ventral aspect, x 20 diams. ; the nervous ganglia and tracheae and the ventral prologs are seen ; there are no anal prologs. Figs. 2 and 3— Lateral and dorsal views of pupa case, x 20 diams. ; on fig. 3 one of the stellate hairs of the Cistus happens to have adhered, having no doubt broken off the larval sac on emergence. Fig. 4 — Hind-wing (denuded), x 35 diams., showing neuration, sufficient scales are left to show the character of the scaling ; in the photograph the spinous wing points are seen, these do not come out in the plate, the dots present are points of scale attachment. Betula, Eeigate : January, 1902. P.S. (22"3"1902).— My larva; raised here have enabled me to note that in fixing its case for aestivation and pupation the larva closes the 102 [May, head end after fixing it to some object if a suitable one is available, and then makes the other extremity the exit end, a reversal precisely the same as occurs in Psychidce and Coleophorce. It closes this end by a portion of silk that protrudes beyond the valves as a white line, and admits of being easily ruptured from within. In case-bearing Adelidce generally the two ends of the case are usually so much alike that the question of whether the larva so re- verses itself for pupation must be diilicult to investigate ; I am not aware of any answer having been given to it. — T. A. C. TWO NEW SL'ECIES OF HEMIPTE11A-HETERUPTERA FROM SPAIN. BY VROF. O. M. EEUTEE. The two insects described were found by Mr. G. C. Champion during his recent expedition to Central Spain, and the specific names adopted have been suggested by him. 1. PlEZOSTETHUS TERKICOLA, Sp. 11. Niger, laavis, niteus ; antennis totis femoribusque nigro-piceis, tibiis tarsisque sat obscure testaceis, tibiis posticis interdumquc etiain anterioribus basi saepe picescentibus ; hemielytris piceis, clavo, em- bolio cuneoque nigris, forma? bracbyptera? basin segmenti .tertii abdo- minis attingentibus, dimidio basali sutura? clavi discrete, cuneo corio circiter triplo breviore, distincte leviter declivi, membrana angustis- sima lineari ; tibiis ppstice tenuiter spinulosis, tenuissime et brevis- sime parce pubescentibus, pilis exsertis destitutis ; riina orificiorum metastethii in angulum leviter obtusum curvata, mox ante marginem basalem pleurae abbrcviata. Long., If — \ mm. This species was found at AJbarracin under stones on a high ridge clothed with pines, in company with Galeatus, Acalypta, Ag- ramma, &c. P. oblujuo, Costa, valde afiinis, differt tamen hemielytris piceis nee albovariegatis tibiisque pilis exsertis destitutis ; P. cursitante, Fall., minor, obscurior, magis nitens, antennis obscurioribus, arti- culo secundo breviore (spatio intcroculari verticis distincte breviore), ultimis nigro-piceis, hemielytris forma? brachyptera? paullo longioribns, obscurioribus, sub-hevibus (omnium tenuissime parcius punctulatis), sutura clavi saltern dimidio basali discreta, cuneo brevi sed discreto et leviter declivi divergens. 1902.] 103 2. Nasocoeis ephedkje, sp. n. Capite, pronoto scutelloque fuscis, fronte clypeoque albido-fiaven- tibus, ilia utrinque fusceseenti-Iineata ; capite pronotoque pilis intri- catis argenteis vestitis, his pilis pronoti vittas tree longitudinales formantibus ; articulo primo antennarum ferrugineo, latitudiui capitis inter apices oculorum aeque longo, crasso, dense et longe plumbeo- nigro-piloso, articulis reliquis gracilibus, albidis, tertio secundo dis- tincte paullo longiore, quarto prime aeque longo ; capite fortiter nutante, clypeo fortiter proininente, uiargine antice setulis clavatis pi umbel's dense instructo ; pronoto basi longitudiue circiter duplo latiore, apice basi fere duplo angustiore ; bemielytris stramineis vel interdum levissime in fuscescens vergentibus, brevitcr sat dense minus teuuiter aureo-pubeseentibus, membrana sat obscure fumata, venis obscurioribus ; femoribus t'uscescentibus, tibiis et tarsis albidis, i 1 lis albo-spiuulosis et subtiliter fusco-punctatis, anticis albo-pilosis. Long., Ik — The species of Orimarga winch occurs on the South Devon coast is not virgo, Zett., but apparently juvenilis, Zett., but at present the question is not quite cleared up. 15. —Why is Xysta vana, Mg., Enfc. Mo. Mag., vol. xxxi, p. 212, omitted ? 16. — Is not AnomcBa permundus, Harris, an older name for A. antica, W. ? 17. — -The larvaa of Heteroneura albimana, Mg., live in rotten wood. I have bred the species from little red pupae. 18. — Why is Masicera virilis, Rnd., Ent. Mo. Mag., vol. v, n. s., p. 157, omitted ? 19. — Is not Pocota personatua, Harris, an older name for P. apiformis, Schrk.? Moses Harris' work was published in 1786, and it is probable tbat many of his names will have to be re-instated. 20. — I think it is a pity (and, perhaps, all Dipterists will agree with me) that Mr. Verrall did not adopt Baron Osten Sackcu's grouping of the families of the Nemo- cera, Ent. Mo. Mag., vol. ii, n. s., p. 39. The position of the Bibionidm and Simulidee in his list appears to be most radically wrong. 21. — Why is not Siphona placed near or next to Prosena, to which it appears much allied ? I have a third species of it — -a tiny little fellow. Glanvillcs Wootton : February 25tk, 1902. REPLY TO MR. DALE'S QUERIES. BY G. II. VERIiALL, F.KS. Through the courtesy of the Editors 1 am enabled to reply at once to Mr. Dale's enquiries. I invite and desire criticisms of my " List of British " Diptera, because such action must conduce to making any subsequent " List " more correct. I will answer Mr. Dale's queries as shortly as possible, and take them in the order he has numbered them. 1. — Typhlopsylla assimilis, Tasch. According to Rothschild (Nov. Zool., v, 539) this species was introduced by Saunders in mistake for 7T. agyrtes, Heller (misprinted in my List as T. agertes), and I have consequently relegated it to the reputed List. 2. — Nov. Zool., v and vii, and Ent. Record. 3. — Pericoma punctum, Eaton. Where has it been described? I know nothing of such a species. I can hardly imagine Eaton naming a species "punctum." 4. — I do not profess to know M. lute.scens, Zett. ; I think I possess M. omata, Steph., in numbers, but I am very uncertain about its nomenclature. As to M. zonata, Steph., I do not know it, but if a synonym of Rhymosia fasciata, Meig., Meigen's name has about twenty years priority. I have said in my preface that the Mycetophilidce are still in a most unfinished condition. 5. — I do not know. Theobald in his recent Monograph omits the species entirely. I have a MS. note that it is a synonym of C. ornatus, Meig. 1902.] 109 6. — C. guttatus, Curt., has long been accepted as a synonym of C. nemorosus, Meig. 7. — Cecidomyia pictipennis, Meig., remains where it was in my List of 1888. Walker did not include it as British in 1856. 8. — It is, according to MS. notes of mine, and I expect that is the reason that I included L. rubi, Schrk., in my List of 1888. 9. — It is possible ; but C. dolens, Wlk., is apparently an Orthocladius, while Zetterstedt's name would sink as a synonym, on the ground of priority, if the two should prove to be the same species. I possess a distinct Chironomus, which I have been calling C. anthracinus, Zett. 10. — Chironomus tarsa/is, Wlk , and C. modicellus, Wlk., are in the expurgated List as being merely encumbrances. They have never yet been " described," and therefore it is impossible to say of what species they are synonyms. 11. — Ceratopogon is a most remarkably homogeneous genus, and all attempts to divide it have been failures. When Winnertz monographed the Mgcetop/iilidee, he made scores of new genera, but in his exquisite monograph of Ceratopogon he recognised that he was dealing with a large natural genus. Some recent further attempts by an inexperienced French author would place numerous males in one of his so-called genera, and the females in another genus. If Mr. Dale will give us thoroughly reliable characters (distinguishing, without doubt, in all species) of Sphreromyia, Culicoides, Serromgia, and Forcipomgia, he will grant a great boon to Dipterologists, because for some seventy years we have been searching for those clear distinctions. 12. — Nothing to do with my " List." 13. — Xiphura rujicornit, Meig., was more than fifty years ago accepted as a synonym of the very variable X. atrata, L. 14. — As Mr. Dale says "at present the question is not quite cleared up." I consider the distinctive characters of the European species of Orimarga still very uncertain. 15. — Xgsta cana, Meig., v. Phasia Rothi, Zett. ; see Austen, Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxiv, 39. 16. — If Moses Harris had described a Mitsca permundus I would have accepted his name, but unfortunately he did not do so. The name he gave is inadmissible, as it is not Latin. 17. — Nothing to do with my " List." 18. — I suppose Masieera virilis, Rnd., was omitted because I had not the vaguest idea what species was intended. When Meade could return Sarcophaga carnaria to an enquirer as a fine new species of Masieera (as I am assured he did) I do not think that he understood the limits of the genus.' 19. — See British Flies (Sgrphidte) pp. 589 and 633. I only re-instate Moses Harris' names when they are indisputable ; in this case there is doubt which can never be cleared up. 20. —Baron Osten Sacken has himself said that lie does not expect his proposed changes to be adopted without long consideration, and possibly modification after they have been well tested. I desired to make as little change as possible from my "List" of 1888, though I can foresee many changes probable, but I hope gradual, such as (pace Osten Sacken) Rhyphus and Leptis next to each other. 110 [Mayi 21. — Siphona is placed as Brauer awl Bergenstamm placer! it, and they knew more about Tachinides than anybody else in the world. As to Mr. Dale having a third species, I dare say I could produce a thirteenth species, but 1 am not satisfied with the distinctions and the nomenclature. Anyhow Siphona, which in our old arrangement was a Tachinid, can have no relationship to Prosena which was a Dexid. I take this opportunity of noting a few corrections to my "List." Ditomt/ia fasciata has been given to me by Rev. E. N. Bloomfield, through a specimen taken by Mr. W. H. Tuck, at Tostock, near Bury St. Edmunds, in May, 1898, and consequently the species may now be considered truly British. Chironomus fuscipennis, Mg., ought not to have been in italics. I caught a female at Boxhill in 18fi7, and one at Colwich in 1889, and I possess a third female from Painswick, taken by Mr. C. J. Watkins, which was also caught in 1889. TheriopJectes luridus, Fallen ; several females of this well marked species were taken by Col. Yerbury at Nethy Bridge, in June, 1900. Even though this species was amongst our " reputeds," I believe this to be the first genuine record. Chilosia carbon aria, Egger, was accidentally omitted from the " List." Syrphus torvux is not S. topiarius, Mg., but .S'. topiarius A not. S. topiarius, Meigen, was only -1?. vitripennis, Meigen. Chrysochlamys rufteornis, F., may have the italics removed, as Mr. F. C. Adams has taken two specimens. Wyalurgus lucidus, Mg. This very distinct Tachinid has been taken by Dr. J. H. Wood, who gave me two specimens, from Ashperton Park (July 12th, 1899) and Woolhope (July 3rd, 1899). It was sent to me as Newor&a rubriea, Mg., but I could only reply that it was not a, Nemorrea at all, though what it, was I could not then say. Hyetodesia vagans, Fallen, is a true British species. The record given bv Mr. B.C.Bradley is quite correct, and 1 have seen his specimens. 1 had previously caught and correctly named one female, but hatl distrusted my own identification. Sussex Lodge, Newmarket : March, 1902. Acletoxenus syrphoides, Frnfd., at "Lyndhurst. — Recently, when looking over some unnamed Dipfera, I noticed two which strongly reminded me of the beautiful illustration of this fly by Mr. Edwin Wilson, published in vol. xxxviii of this Magazine, and a reference to same, aided by the very lucid description given by Mr. Collin, leaves no doubt in my mind of their identity. I can therefore record the capture of a J on September 19th, 1898, and .a 9 on July 15th, 1900, both in my garden at the above place. — F. C. Adams, ")i», .Ashley Gardens, S.W. : March 29M, 1902. Chrysochlamys ruficornis, F., in (he New Forest (supplementary). — Since the publication in the April number of this Magazine of my " Notes on Diptera in the New Forest during 1901," 1 have come to the conclusion the capture of C. ruficornis, F., for identification of which I am indebted to Mr. Verrall and his nephew Mr. 1902.1 HI Collin, ought to be specially recorded. I possess two specimens of this fly, one having been taken some years hack in my garden at Lyndhurst on July Kith, and placed in my cabinet at the time as doubtful C. rupZcornis, where it was overlooked until I took the other on April 25th, 1901. I exhibited both at Mr. Yen-all's Meeting of the Entomological Club, held January 14th, 1902, and as (here was still some doubt about the specific name, left them with Mr. Collin, who kindly promised further examination, and he recently returned them as undoubted ruficornis, F., an opinion which was confirmed by Mr. Yen-all ; the former also wrote " this is an interesting capture, as it confirms Mr. Yen-all's conjectures in British Flies (Syr- phida), page 627."— In. : April 3rd, 1902. Dipterous parasite of Acanthopsyche atra, L. (opace/la, H.-S.).—Jn my note in the Ent. Mo. Mag., 1901, pp. 62 and 127, I was unable to give the name of this parasite. Some flies bred from A. atra, and almost certainly the same specie-- re- ferred to in these notes, are determined by Mr. Collin to be St om atomy ia Jilipalpis, Riul., which has been recorded fo have been bred from Psyche yraminella and unicolor (names which are synonymous), a fact that confirms my suggestion that the control of the parasite over the instincts of its victim had not been learned on atra only. Acanthopsyche opacella, H.-S., must now be called A. atra, L., the Linnean type having been uncart lied by Mr. Prout.— T. A. Chapman, Betula, Reigate : April, 1902. Lathrohium atripalpe. Sharp, and other Coieoptera in North Yorkshire. — It may interest Coleopterists to learn of the occurrence of a few somewhat rare beetles in North Yorkshire during 1901. When collecting in Upper Teesdale in September I took a specimen of the rare Lathrohium atripalpe, Sharp, under a stone on the high moor near Cronkley. In Saltburn Wood I beat a single Anaspis Oarneysi, Fowler, from whitethorn blossom in June ; whilst Tthagonycha unicolor, Curt, (in July), and Malthodes miselliis, Kies. (in June), were swept from herbage in the same locality. At Saltburn, too, Homalota frayilis, Er., was found running over the mud on the margin of a stream in July, but I only captured one specimen. Two " notes " appeared in this Magazine during last year on the habitat of Dryo- philus pitsillus, Gyll., one by Dr. J. Harold Bailey, and the other by Mr. F. H. Day. This species is common in Saltburn Wood in June, but I have only, as yet, observed the insect on larches. — M. LAWSON Thompson, 35, Leven Street, Saltburn- by-the-Sea: March Mlh, 1902. [The specimen of Anaspis Oarneysi referred to is a male, and is easily verified hy the characters of the third ventral segment of the abdomen in this sex, which is much elongated, and is furnished with two rather stout and widely separated ap- pendages, which are strongly curved inwards towards one another, and enclose between them an almost circular smooth and shining space. The species is probably not uncommon, but is overlooked, as it closely resembles A. frontalis, from which it may lie known by the somewhat longer and more slender antenna1 and more evident sculpture, and also by the colour of the legs; it has occurred at Ditton, Horsell, Ashtead, Claygate, Mickleham, Cowley, Loughton, Darenth Wood, New Forest, Tewkesbury, &C.-W. W. P.]. 112 [May, Tachys parvu/us, Dej., at Horsell. — Amongst a number of common Coleoptera captured on the wing to-day — the first really fine day this year — I was agreeably surprised, on emptying the bottle in the evening, to find a specimen of Tachys parvu- lus, Dej. It has quite recently been recorded from the New Forest (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxviii, p. 65).— G. C. Champion, Horsell, Woking : April 13th, 1902. Sirex juvencus, L , in Paternoster Row, London. — On the Eth inst. a very lively 9 of Sirex juvencus was caught in an office in Paternoster Row ; it is still living. Probably it had emerged from a continental packing ease. — R. MoLachlan, Lewis- ham, London : April 17th, 1902. A black variety of Hoi ocentr opus picicornis, Steph. (Trichoptera) from South- West Ireland. — Col. Yerbury gave me a small black Trichopteron from Parknasilla (Co. Kerry) which he took on July 13th, 1901. At first sight it resembles a small Silo or large Bercea, but examination proved it to be a Holocentropus, with no structural characters to distinguish it from H. picicornis. The wings are totally black, with the pubescence of the anterior slightly rusty (which will probably in- tensify with age), the antennae without annulations. Mr. Morton agrees with me that the appendages (it is a £ ) show no difference, and Mr. King informs me that he has not met with a similar variety in the Killarney district, where he has done much collecting. As is so often the case in parallel instances only this one example was taken : in fact, Col Yerbury brought only two specimens of Trichoptera from the district, this and a (J of Sericostoma personatum, Sp. In my " Monographic Revision and Synopsis," p. 403, I say of IT. picicornis that some examples have the anterior wings " nearly black, without markings." I possess no such old specimen now, and feel sure the words were not intended to apply to so black a form as that noticed above. — Id. : April 5th, 1902. A few Trichoptera from West Cornwall. — It may be well to place on record the following species captured by me between May 20th and June 6th, 1901 : — Leptocerus cinereus, Curt., Lizard ; Adicella reducta, McLach., Lelant, Porthon- stock ; Dipleclronafelix, McLach., St. Ives, Lelant, Porthonstock ; Philopotamus wont anus, Don., St. Ives ; Wormaldia occipitalis, Piot., St. Ives, Lelant, Porthon- stock ; Plectrocnemia geniculata, McLach., St. Ives ; Polycentropus favomaculatus, Pict., Porthonstock ; Tinodes wceneri, L., a small form, Lizard ; T. assimilis, McLach., Porthonstock ; Rhyacophila dorsalis, Curt., St. Ives ; Ayapetus fuscipes, Curt., St. Tves, Lelant.— W. C. Boyd, Cheshunt : April, 1902. Historical Notes on Lyca-na Acts in Britain. — I have read, and with interest, Mr. Dale's " Historical Notes on Lyccena (Polyommatus in my day) Acis" in the April No. of the Ent. Mo. Mag., p. 76. I see my name mentioned as having taken Ads in Gloucestershire as follows : — " Two at Lower Guiting, on the Cotswolds, by the Rev. J. Greene in the beginning of July, 1849 " (Zoologist, vol. x, p. 3494). The capture is correct, but the date of the year and the month of the capture are alike wrong. The reference to vol. x of the "Zoologist" (published 1852) is " List of Lepidoptera on the Cotswolds, Gloucestershire," written and sent by 1902.] 11B myself to the Editor in 1853, when 1 was at Halt-on, Bucks. The fourth on the List is " P. Acis, scarce, two, end of June." There is no gear mentioned, and the month is June not July. Where Mr. Dale got his dates I know not; but it is sufficient evidence of their being wrong that I did not go to Guiting till October, 1819. The two Acis were taken June, 1850. " 1 was younger then," and knew little or nothing about "rarities," &c, but now 1 know that L was fortunate enough, during the two summers of 1850-1, to capture eight Acis and eight Ariun, both now in my comparatively small collection. I should like to take this opportunity of correcting two or three mistakes (owing to my ignorance) in my list. (1) N. tritophus = zic-zac ; (2) Chaonia larva1 on oak not hazel ; (3) 11. satura, of course adusta. — J. Greene, Rosti-evor, Clifton, Bristol : April 4-th, 19U2. The pupa of Sphinx convolvuli in England. — All Lepidouterists are aware of the unusual numbers of this insect last year, not only of the imago, but also of the larva, and occasionally the pupa ; it is of this last that I write a few lines. In last year's " Entomologist," p. 295, appears a communication headed " Sphinx con- volvuli pupa." I quote the following few lines from it : — " I have recently received a very fine living pupa of S. convolvuli, which was found by a person employed digging potatoes on the Sussex coast, on September 4th. This is the first living specimen I have seen found in this county. In searching through the ' Entomolo- gist,' vol. i, to present date, I find only two pupas are recorded as having been found, one on October 18th, 1876, and one October 31st, 1881.— F. W. Frohawk, September, 1901." Mr. Frohawk is right as to the " Entomologist," but if he will refer to the already quoted vol. x of the "Zoologist," p. 3334, he will find under the heading " Search for Pupaj," " Sphinx convolvuli, &c." — Joseph Greene, Lower Guiting, November 13th, 1851. The pupa produced a very fine specimen, and is now in my collection. I have always thought that this was the first pupa ever taken in this country. — Id. Anosia 1'lexippus (Llanais Archippus) in the Isle of Wight in 1896. — I cannot find any later record of Danais Archippus having been seen in England than that of October, 2nd, 1890, at Eastbourne, mentioned in " British Lepidoptera " by Mr. C. G. Barrett. It may be of interest to your readers to know that in August, 1896, my son and I saw a fine specimen of this insect on a bramble thicket quite close to the Newchurch Station of the Isle of Wight Central Railway. Unfortu- nately we were unable to capture it. There was, however, no question as to its identity. — II. W. S. Worsley-Benison, 45, Woodberry Grove, Finsbury Park, N. : March 10th, 1902. Phlogophora meticulosa, L., in December. — In volume ix, second series, of this Magazine, page 66, Mr. Eustace R. Bankes records the capture of a male of this species on December 18th, 1897. It may therefore be of interest to mention that I took a specimen, also a male, at rest on the wall of a roadside cottage here on December 9th last, during wintry weather. The moth is slightly faded, but other- wise is in good condition. — A. E. J. Carter, 82, West Holmes Gardens, Mussel- burgh, N. B. : April 3rd, 1902. 114 LMay, §ru inu. A List of the Hymenoptera-Aculeata so far obseryrd in the Counties of Lancashire and Cheshire, with notes on the habits of the Genera ; by Willoughbt Gardner, F.L.S., F.R.G.S., F.E.S. 8vo, pp. 1—61, 1901. Reprinted from Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc., vol. xv, 1901. This is a very well got up local list, to which is added a map showing tlie localities which have been collected in ; from this map one realizes nt once how little of these counties has really been worked for Hymenoptera, and there can be little doubt that the list will be largely extended when collectors can be found to visit the less known districts ; at present 44 °/0 of the total known British species have occurred, and amongst these is one species, Coelioxys mandibular is, which has not been recorded from elsewhere. Mr. Gardner has added some particulars as to the habits of the British genera, which should encourage local Entomologists to study this much neglected branch of the subject. — E. S. ttuarj). Prof. Carlos Berg, C.M.Z.S., F.E.S. , Director of the National Museum at Buenos Ayres, died there on January 19th, after a long illness.* He was, we think, a native of the Russian Baltic Provinces, and before his emigration to South America ho held the post of Librarian at Riga. At first his position in the Argen- tine Republic was subordinate, but just before the death of Burmeister, in 1892, he succeeded the latter as Director. Berg's studies embraced nearly the whole of the Insecta, and other Arthropods, and his work is generally considered sound and reliable. His geographical limits extended to the extreme south of South America, and included much that is interesting from Patagonia, Tiorra del Fuego, Chili, &c. He revisited Europe on several occasions : we met him in London only a year or two ago. He joined the Entomological Society of London in 1882, and was elected a Corresponding Member of the Zoological Society in 1896. Entomology in Argen- tina has been fortunate in having had two such capable students as Burmeister and Berg ; let us hope the death of the latter will not throw it back ! ^ori^tip. Lancashire and Cheshire Entomological Society : March loth, 1902. Mr. Robt. Newstead, A.L.S., F.E.S., in the Chair. Mr. E. Whitley, of " Clovelly," Sefton Park, Liverpool, and Oxford University, was elected a Member of the Society. It was resolved that the next meeting be held in Liverpool on April 14th, and that Messrs. F. C. Thompson, F. Birch, and E. J. B. Sopp be appointed a sub- committee to examine and report on the condition of the Library of the Society at an early date. A paper on " Organic Evolution," with lime-light views, was communicated by * Another account says " suddenly on January 21st." I»"2.] 115 Mr. William Hewett, President of the York and District, Naturalists' Society, who, whilst dealing very ably with the subject in general, also made special allusion to many points of peculiar interest to Entomologists, more particularly with respect to varieties in the Lepidoptera. An interesting discussion followed on the melanism of Amphidasys betularia, var. Doubledayaria, and other moths, in which the Chairman, Mr. J. Ray Hardy, of Owen's College, Dr. J. Cotton, Messrs. F. N. Pierce, B. H. Crabtree, Or. O. Day, and others took part. On the motion of Mr. Pierce, seconded by Mr. E. J. B. Sopp, a hearty vote of thanks was accorded the lecturer for his paper. The fine display of exhibits included amongst others : — the drawing of an extraordinary abnormality in Prionus calif ornicus,vih'\c\\ was double in every limb, and a series of cases of Coleoptera by Mr. Ray Hardy ; Tryphana interjecta and Noetua glareosa and brunnea, &c, by Mr. R. Newstead, on behalf of Miss A. Steele Perkins, of Rhyl ; bone variety of Arctia plantaginis, and var. hospita, by Mr. Harold Milne ; Orgyia pudibunda, by Dr. J. Cotton and Mr. F. C. Thompson ; Abraxas grossulariata, varieties, Ephyra, &&., by Mr. B. H. Crabtree ; two rare Dutch volumes with coloured plates, by Sepp, and Lepidoptera varieties, by Mr. Gr. O. Day ; varieties of Arctia Caja, by Mr. F. C. Johnson ; Arctia fubri- cipeda, urticce, &c, by Mr. Herbert Massey ; Dianthecia conspersa, by Mr. F. N. Pierce ; Perthshire Coleoptera and Cwlioxys mandibularis, a Hymenopteron new to the British list, by Mr. F. Birch ; Hemiptera from Bolton, by Mr. Oscar Whit- taker ; Anechura bipunctata, an Armenian earwig, with the Caucasian variety, orientalis, by Mr. E. J. B. Sopp.— E. J. Burgess Sopp, Bon. Secretary. The South London Entomological and Natural History Society : Annual Meeting.— March 13th, 1902.— Mr. F. Noad Clark, President, in the Chair. Mr. A. L. Rayward, of Wallington ; Mr. B. Stonell, of Clapham ; and Mr. S. P. Harry, of Clapham ; were elected Members. Dr. Chapman exhibited a number of species, which he was placing in the Society's Collections, including Eupithecia consignata,Hyboma strigosa and Jochesera ttlni, the first of which species was now only to be obtained in one very restricted private locality. Mr. Kemp, living larvae and perfect insects of Endomychus coccineus, Ptilinus pectinicomis, and Pyrochroa serraticornis, the two former from Epping Forest, on hornbeam, and the latter from New Eltham, under moss. Messrs. Harrison and Main, specimens of the dark v. nigrofulvata of Macaria liturata, from Delamere Forest. Mr. F. M. B. Carr, a considerable number of specimens from the New Forest, including Odonata, Ischnura pumilio, female vars. of Pyrrhosoma nymphula, Agrion mercuriale, and Gomphus viilgatissimtts : Lepidoptera, a large number of species, among which were Aventia JJexuIa, Lithosia helvola, bred Gnophria quadra, Nola strigula, Triphmna subsequa, Heliothis dip- saceits, Cleora glabraria, bred Cleora Jichenaria, Selidosema plumaria, and Hyria auroraria. Mr. Nottle, examples of Ag rot is tritici and A. agathina from Keston. Mr. Barrett, a living specimen of Nyssia hispidaria, female, from Chingford. Mr. F. Noad Clark, two species of Tick, new to the British list, They were forwarded to him by Mr. Hewitt, of York, who found them upon Guillemots, on the Yorkshire cliffs. They had been identified as Ixodes fimbriates and Irodes borealis, both rare I 2 116 TMay. and little known species. He also exhibited the common Ixodes reduviua for com- parison, together with photographs of /. fimbriatus. Dr. Chapman, a living bred specimen of Endromis versicolor, and some pupae, in the larva-cases of Thyridopteryx ephemerarformis. Mr. Edwards, very fine examples of Ornithoptera Lydeus, and O. Socrates from the Malays, with Par nassius imp erato rand P. Horsleyanux from Thibet. Mr. Turner, a long bred series of Macroglossa stellatarum, from larvae obtained at Bromley, Kent, and contributed notes on breeding and habits of the larvae. Mr. Lucas, a very large number of lantern slides to illustrate his remarks on " Entomo- logical localities." They were chiefly of well-known spots in the New Forest. Mr. West, of S treat ham, showed a few slides taken from several localities near London. — Hy. J. Tuknkr. Hon. Sec. Entomolootcal Society of London: March 5th, 1902. — The Rev. Canon W. W. Fowler, M.A., F.L.S., President, in the Chair. Dr. P.. Douglas Macdonald, M.D., of Malsette, Rhodesia, S. Africa ; and Mr. Arthur M. Montgomery, of the Grove, Ealing, W. ; were elected Fellows of the Society. Mr. L. Pi. Pro nt exhibited on behalf of Mr. J. P. Mutch, of Hornsey Road, London, N., aberrations of Vanessa (Eugonia) polychlorox, L., a $ bred by Mr. H. Baker from pupa from Stowmarket, Suffolk ; a Chrysophanus Phlceas, L. (captured in the Isle of Wight, August, 1901) ; Agrotis pitta, Hb., a perfectly-halved gynandromorphous example, the right side Ichneumons in the General Collection from Nova Scotia and New York which differ from the above species only in having the 5th and 7th segments also pale banded and the internal orbits red. P. 19 — /. ancipiterus. This $ is certainly very closely allied to, and perhaps identical with, Amblyteles unidentatus, Berth., ILev. Sc. Bourb., 1894 ; Ann. Soc. Fr., 1895, p. 602. * Desvignes is also said to have described Ichneumon, crassicornis in the Trans. Ent. Soc. Lond. ; this Berthoumieu synonym iaes with Protichneuraon pisorius, Linn., ; I know nothing of it.— C. M. 1902.] 123 P. 20 — I. dubitatus. Much resembles Amblyteles palliatorius, Grav., large orange blotches placed as another band ; anal extremity bright orange ; legs black, prolegs orange-red. A really handsome and striking creatine. Pupa smooth and shining, dark red-brown, with little sculpture, but the abdominal segments strongly ridged behind ; eremaster thick, somewhat conical, and armed with two short hooks. The moth is a creature of quite remarkable loveliness, shining white, the fore-wings shaded with silvery-grey or pale silvery-buff, and barred with thick black lines ; the discal spot brilliant scarlet ; down the back of the thorax are three pairs of orange spots, and there is an orange band on each abdominal segment]. Cucullia (several species). — " Edward has been making a garden beyond the river, in a wilderness of trees and bushes, away from the fowls. We cross the river by stepping stones from our shrubbery and climb a steep bank to reach it. It is a pretty place, but not so easy of access for night hunting. One night he said that he had seen hawk-moths there at the blossoms of some broad beans which had been planted, so I took over a net and secured a few ; but my most satisfactory captures were some silvery and whitish moths that haunted the bean flowers just as darkness fell. There are several of what I call the ' silver splash ' {Cucullia Hulchinsoni Hpsn.), and a darker kind much like it in habits (C. extricata, Walk.), which have given us much pleasure. I have been over there many evenings, counting the effort quite worth while if I brought back one or two. They are timid and dasli off, so that I have to go away and wait before they will come back. I hunted those beans thoroughly till the moths got quite shy, and I had to divide my time between these and the peach trees which were in blossom, around which the large Silver Y's (Plusia circumflexa, L.) were abundant, and the American pests (Heliothis armigera, L.) were most insistent. The moths at the bean flowers begin to fly at dusk, when you can just see the movement at the blossoms, but I do not think that they feed late. With the exception of a few pods for seed this was the only crop that we had from the beans ; the di'ought affected them, and then the ' cocos ' beetles came and cleared off the blossoms ! I caught one or two of the ' silver splashed ' (C. Hulchin- soni) also at the fruit blossom, but I think none of the darker species (C. extricata). There were some dark ones with a silver splash (C. pallidi stria, Feld.) which gave us great delight. These only lasted for a week or two, but I still get sometimes a silver splash. Orange, lemon and 'nautje' furnish this, and C. consimilis, Feld., C. africana, Auriv., C. chrysota, Hpsn., and C. terensis, Feld., all rarely; one or two have come to the flower we call honeysuckle, and also to the wild cotton plant." Plusia exquisita, Feld. — " This beautiful species was hovering at the bean blossom, but I have caught more at blossoming orange, lemon and nautje trees on a very damp evening. The favourite is the nautje, which blossoms all over, and seems sweeter than the orange or lemon ; its fruit is flattish orange-shaped, with a very thin, bitter skin, but the inside juicy and very sweet." Plusia circumflexa, L. — " E. brought me a common smooth green caterpillar feeding on lettuce. It quickly spun up and speedily came out." [This species appears quite to take the place, in South Africa, of our commonest species, P. gamma. The pupa sent is very dull black, short and thick, the tongue case prominent but curved down under the abdominal segments ; eremaster con- sisting merely of two short, thick, hooked spikes.] Plusia permissa, Walk. — " Several larvse were found on a very delicate feathery ioo2.] 127 plant, apparently an asparagus, anil were reared. This, and some other Plusice, &r\d lladena renisigma buzz around the large sunflower (Helianthus) blossoms commonly at dusk. They are very lively, and netting them about these heavy flowers feels like hitting at a plate." [This is a much smaller and more blunt-winged species, having on its fore-wings a small and slender silver Y. The pupa skins sent are very smooth, rather shining, the tongue projection small, the lower surface semi-transparent white, indicating that the wing and limb covers wore, in the living pupa, bright green ; the dorsal surface dark umbreous, shading off at the sides, but on the thoracic portion showing curious markings like the head and claws of a beetle larva ; cremaster thick, strongly projecting, black-brown, armed with a tuft of hooked bristles which cling tightly to the cocoon. The latter is light coloured, loose, silken, spun up among the fine twigs of the plant]. Plusia Jimbirena, Gn. — " The bright green caterpillar with a fine white line down the back fed on a creeper which grows round the fern stump in the verandah (Tradescantia ?). It changes more rapidly than any other chrysalis that I get." [This is another of the "gamma" group; its fore-wings dark bronzy-brown, with a bright golden gloss, the Y pale golden, slender, and sharply defined ; the hind-wings dark grey-brown ; the thoracic crest short and blunt. Pupa thin skinned, glossy, with very faint wrinkled sculpture, brown, more black-brown on the back, the dorsal shield having a still blacker horse-shoe shaped mark ; cremaster short but broad, spud-shaped, furnished with minute hooked bristles. In a thin, fine, loose cocoon of dull white silk, among leaves or any convenient materials]. Trigonodes obstans, Walk. — " I have labelled these ' common nuisance.' They seem to insist on being caught, and look so promising, flying in the dim light, that one is constantly induced to run after them. I believe that they frequent every flowering tree that has honey, and they particularly love aloe flowers. In these flowers the honey is so abundant that children break off the aloe stems to get at it. I once caught my girl with a lot of the thin watery honey in a tin basin ; she had broken off the aloe blossoms on which I had prided myself— beautiful scarlet aloes all round the front of the house — and was going to drink the honey which she had drained from them. I fancy that moths find it rather intoxicating, more so than peach honey, for when disturbed the heavy ones fall down among the thorny spikes of leaves and are lost, unless I can catch them by putting the net underneath, but woe to the poor net, the thorns are hooked all along the edges of the fleshy leaves. From peach or apricot blossom the moths fly away briskly." Eurrhipia aditlatrtx, Hub.— This pretty moth I found by day on a Begonia blossom ; so queerly settled, with wings clasped closely down, fore-legs rather visibly put forward, and the abdomen curled up, that I thought, until I looked closely at it, that it was a little faded flower." Eriopus LatreiUii, Dup. — These moths are reared from some caterpillars that I found on the fern stump ; they were smooth, not hairy, bright brown, with a fine light yellow line along each side, and a fainter dorsal line formed of yellow and black markings. I send cocoons." [These cocoons are soft and slight, composed of thin brown silk. The enclosed pupa short, broad and slightly flattened, extremely glossy, but almost without 128 [June, sculpture, light red-brown, the eyes and dorsal segments rather darker ; cremaster hardly noticeable, except for a small tuft of fine bristles]. Achcea Lienardi. — "I have another thing which will, I think, be of interest — the smaller kind of fruit destroyer with its chrysalis and a drawing of its larva. The food plant is rose; this is what we found the larvae upon, but they also ate mimosa." [The larva as figured is elongated and in form much like tliose of the Catocalce. The head very round, brown edged with black ; body dull umbreous with an angulated black spot on the fifth segment, and two black-brown pointed humps on the twelfth ; anal segment tipped with black ; and a black stripe runs along the whole under-surface in the middle ; legs brown. The younger larva is blacker, more slender, and the humps on the twelfth segment are in proportion larger. Pupa rather long, tapering regularly off behind, more like that of a large Geometra than a Noctua, smooth and with only minute dotted sculpture on the abdominal segments ; anal segment longitudinally ribbed and wrinkled in a very singular manner; cremaster only a small bundle of tiny hooked bristles ; whole surface purple-red covered with a fine thin whitish bloom. In a slight silken cocoon among its food]. Some further information being asked for with reference to tlie fruit destroying habits of this and other species, calling attention to Mr. G. A. K. Marshall's note (Ent. Mo. Mag., 2nd series, vol. ii, p. 207) — " I did not reply to your enquiry about the fruit'motb. I feel certain that it pierces the figs, there being a fine pin-prick spot where it has been sucking, and also that it damages the peaches. They do not all have maggots, though many do, doubtless produced by flies. I kept some of the pierced peaches for a considerable time to see what came of it, but could find no proceeds. I cannot prove anything, so will let the matter drop for the present, only it is a settled conviction out here that the fruit is damaged by moths, and I think with sound reason. This last season we had the smaller fruit-moth (A. Lienardi) in such multitudes that they sprung up all along, as one walked among the bushes or shook a tree ; and they settled so thickly upon the peaches before they were fully ripe, even by daylight, that one could go and pick out the scarcer varieties, this being one of the most variable of moths. At the same time we could scarcely find a sound peach ; the crop was quite a failure. The large fruit-moths ( ' SpMngomorpha chlorea) come at night, and smaller species without number ; also wasps, flies and beetles in the daytime ; but it was the lesser fruit-moths (A. Lienardi) that were the chief raiders this season. Sometimes one side of a fig becomes porous like a sponge, as if all the moisture were sucked away. Do not imagine that it annoys me to be contradicted. I only want the truth, and fuller knowledge. I know far too little to be an authority." Two months later. — "We had a visitor the other day — a lady who has told me many interesting things about insects which she has noticed in going about the Colony. I was asking her about the fruit moth, she having told me before of the clouds and flocks of them which she had come across in the open veldt. I asked her whether she was sure that they damaged the fruit, suggesting flies as the possible depredators, or at any rate as the beginners of the mischief. She said she was perfectly sure that the moths did it, and instanced that they had some par- 1902.] 129 ticularly fine apples sent from a distance, which would take days, if not weeks, on the road. These were placed on a table in the room. Presently she noticed a large specimen of the smaller fruit-moth (A. LienardiJ settle upon the very finest apple, and pierce it with its long trunk (just as I have previously described to you), feasting away with great content. If this apple had been previously fly-damaged it would certainly have begun to decay, since fruit when injured does not keep long in this climate. A day or two will finish it. My visitor has promised to notice more particularly the causes of damage to the fruit in future.' [It seems clear to me that my correspondent has doubly established her point. If, as here appears, an excessive abundance of the moths which feed on the fruit is accompanied by a complete destruction of the crop, it seems evident that the moths cause that destruction, unless it can be shown that the unusual increase in numbers of moths is accompanied by an equally abnormal abundance of the Dipterous peach- fly-] AN ANNOTATED LIST OF NEUROPTERA-PLANIPENNIA COLLECTED IN CENTRAL SPAIN BY DR. T. A. CHAPMAN AND MR. G. C. CHAMPION IN JULY AND AUGUST, 1901. BY ROBERT McLACHLAN, F.R.S., &c. During their journey in Central Spain in 1901, Messrs. Chapman and Champion got together a very considerable lot of Neuroptera (in the broad sense), and of much interest, for although there is not much absolutely new to record, little, if anything, has been published on the species inhabiting the region visited. I propose here to deal with the PJanipennia (also in the broad sense). PANORPID^. Panorpa meridionalis, Ramb. Tragacete, 2 $ , 3 , T. A. C, G. C. C. I have elsewhere more than once remarked that examples from the Iberian Peninsula are smaller than those from the French Pyrenees. RHAPHIDIID.3E. Rhaphidia maculicollts, Steph. ? One damaged 9 from Bronchales, G. C. C, remains somewhat doubtful. 'the distinctions between R. macu/icollis and R. bcetica, Ramb., are not always very clear. MYRMELEONIDtE. Palpakes hispantts, Hag. Cuenea, several, T. A. C, G. C. C. I have before me about sixty examples of P. hispantis from the Iberian Peninsula and Algeria. They retain their distinctive characters, slight though they be, in a marked degree, and vary very little either in size or markings ; whereas P. libelluloides is strongly variable, and as one proceeds eastwards resolves itself into forms that may be sub- specific to say the least. There is no evidence that P. libelluloides occurs in the regions inhabited by P. hispanus and vice versa. That one is representative of the other is undoubted, but they are permanently distinct. 130 [June, Ceeagris pltjmbeus, Oliv. Cuenca, Puerto cle Losilla, Albarracin, 4 ?, T. A. C. Mykmec-elueus trigrammus, Pallas. Cuenca, 3 $ , T. A. C. Macronemurus appendicuiatus, Latr. Tragacete, Puerto de Losilla, Albar- racin, 5 ? , T. A. C. Myrmeleon nemausiensis, Boik. Cuenca, 1 example, T. A. C. Myrmeleon formicarius, L., McL. (formiealynx, Auct.). Bronchales, 1 9> T. A. C. ; Tragacete, 1 ? , G. C. C. ASCALAPHID^E. Bubopsis agrioides, Ramb. Cuenca, 1 local bred females (from Sutton Park) from young larvas found in the spring and bred the same summer ; the specimens varying from very light to quite dark ; also some males taken by " scmbling " at Sutton, with wide light bars approaching var. calluncB, Palmer ; in answer to questions he said that he had also taken larva? in the autumn in Sutlon Park, which were then full fed. Mr. A. D. Imms, Lepisma sac- charina, L., taken in a kitchen at West Bromwich, he said it was one of the few British species of Thysanura. Mr. C. J. Wainwright, photos, of insects and parts of insects taken by Mr. Mearns, of Aberdeen. Mr. Gr. T. Bethune- Baker, a drawer full of Lycwnidce, of the group Amblypodia, chiefly of the genus Arhopala, and gave an account of the same, explaining his theories of the origin of the various forms. He believes all were originally brown, and the more blue there is the more recent tho species probably is. April 21st, 1902. — The Vice-President in the Chair. Mr. C. Bradley showed the following species of Aculeate Hymenoptera from Wyre Forest, Pompilus cinctellus, .Spin., Agenia hircana, ¥., 1'seudagenia pnnctum, F., and Sfelis aterrima, Panz., all being new to tho district. Mr. C. J. Wainwright, a small collection of Diptera made by Dr. T. A. Chapman in Spain last year, chiefly in the Sierra Albarracin ; amongst the more interesting species were T'otucel/a e/egans, Port., originally described Irom Spain, Physvcephala chrysorrhaa , Meig., Anthrax ve/utina, Meig., Systwchus leucophaus, Meig., Holopugon clavipes, Loew, Cyrtus gibbu.i, ¥., and a series of a species oi Tachinid of the Plagia group, which had been bred from larva? of Albarracina Kurbi,and which appears to be undescribed, vevy distinct from any of the known species. Mr. W. H. Flint, a long series of Brephos notha, lib., taken in the Forest of Dean last Easter Tuesday ; the species was quite common, flying chiefly round the aspens, and he noticed that they did not appear to come to sallow blossom at all like their congener partkenias. Mr. Bethune- Baker, a number of South African Lyvanidic, including many of colours and patterns unusual to the family. Mr. W. II. Flint gave an account of the structure and development, &c, of the wings of Lepidoptera. — Colbran J. Wainwright, Hon. Secretary. Lancashire and Cheshire Entomological Society : April 14 , G. C. C. The yellow of the body more extended than in northern examples. Onyciiogomphus forcipatus, L. Bronchales, 1 $ , T. A. C. This should perhaps be referred to the var. unguiculatus, V. d. L. ; the yellow is more extended than in northern examples, but less so than in those from Algeria. CORDULEGASTRIN^E. Cordulegaster annulatus, Latr., var. immacttlifrons, Selys. Cuenea, Tragacete, Bronchales, 14 $ (no ?), T. A. C. Tragacete, 1 $, G. C. C. Among so many males it is curious there should be no female. .ESCHNIN^. iEsCHNA cyanea, Mull. Bronchales, 1 ? , T. A. C. iEscHNA mixta, Latr. Albarracin, 1 ? , T. A. C. CALOPTERYGIN^. Calopteryx splendens, Harris, var. xanthostoma, Chp. Cuenea, Tragacete, 7 $ , 8 ? , T. A. C, G. C. C. Calopteryx Virgo, L., var. meridionalis, Selys. Tragacete, Bronchales, 5 which leaped on the leaves of aquatic plants, and there was a recent record of another species with kindred habits being found in Java. Professor E. B. Poulton remarked that Professor Miall was interested in insects which skate upon the water, but there were also some Orthoptera which were aquatic in another sense. Mr. Annandale had brought back from the Malay region an aquatic insect of this Order (a Blatia), which was far too heavy to skim upon the surface. The President added that there was some Coleoptera which, although non-aquatic, were so specialized as to be able to use their limbs in a similar manner to water-beetles. Dr. T. A. Chapman, M.D., F.Z S., communicated a paper on "Asymmetry in the Males of Hemarine and other Sphinges." Mr. E. Meyrick, B.A., F.Z.S., communicated a paper on " Lepidoptera from the Chatham Islands." — H. Rowland-Beown, Hon. Sec. 1902.] 163 REVISION OF THE NOMENCLATURE OF MICRO-LEPIDOPTERA. BY THE RIGHT HON. LORD WALSINGHAM, M.A., LL.I)., F.R.S., &c, AND JOHN HARTLEY DURRANT, F.E.8. (Continued from Vol. XXXVIII, page 29). Billberg's Enumeratio (1820). In the third edition of his Catalog (following Scudder) Staudinger has adopted certain of Billberg's logonymic genonyms sinking as their synonyms other genonyms well-known to all Lepidopterists. That the names now employed are unfamiliar does not necessarily imply that their rescue from oblivion is unjustifiable, but as logonyms were also used for a few genera of Micro- Lepidoptera it becomes incumbent on us to publish decisions which have already been ex- pressed in litt. We have been asked whether there is any evidence that the book was ever published, and whether it is not probable that it was merely the privately printed catalogue of a private collection ; we have also been asked whether we regard Billberg's names as valid genonyms. Through the extreme courtesy of Professor G. Lindstrom, we were enabled in 1892 to study the copy in the Library of the Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, and Dun-ant made a careful transcript of the introduction, and of the pages relating to the Lepidoptera. The title and collation are as follows : — " Enumeratio | Insectorum | in I Museo j Gust. Joh. Billberg. | Eeg. Svec. Judicii Decasterii cameralis Con- silarii. | Beg. Ord. de Stella polari Equitis | Acadd. et Societt. Svec. et exter Membri. | Typis Gadelianis, 1820" [= Holmiae]. 4° pp. (i-iv) -f 138 [pp. (i-iv) unpaged = (i) title ; (ii) blank ; (iii-iv) Expl. Sign. Auct. Lepidoptera, pp. 75 — 93]. N.B. — The abbreviation " Eg." = " Auctor hujus operis." From general appearance the book would appear to have been properly published, and has been accepted as published by those who have dealt with it. As little appears to be known among Lepidopterists about Bill- berg, his Enumeratio, or his Collection, it may be well to reprint what of importance is known to us on the subject. Hummel (A.D.), Essais Entomologiques, IV, 3—4 (St. Peters- bourg, 1825), wrote thus of " Enumeratio Insectorum in Museo G. J. Billberg. 1820. in 4 " :— " Mr. Ego a fait tout son possible pour augmenter la confusion dans la synony- niie des genres, en cre'ant de nouvelles denominations absurdes et qui ne prouvent qu'une seule chose : l'envie de placer son Ego apres des noms tels qu' Olethrus au lieu 164 [July> de Lethrus,Hopla au lieu do Hoplia, Coprias au lieu de Copris, Chelonitex au lieu de Chelonarium, Anabias au lieu d'Anobium, Dixu.i au lieu de Ditomus, Harpalens au lieu de Harpalus, Apius au lieu A'Apion, Bones au lieu de Doros, etc., etc. Heu- reusement les exemplaires de cette inonstrueuse ('numeration sont devenus fort rares, parce que la plus grande partie de l'edition a ete la proie de l'incendie qui en 1822 detruisit la precieuse bibliotheque et les belles collections de l'auteur. Cet evene- ment, si deplorable sous tous les autres rapports, et qui a inspire le plus vif interet pour Mr. Billberg a tons ceux qui aiment l'Histoire naturelle, ne fut cependant pas sans utilite par les bornes qu'il mit a des innovations mal fondles et passablement ridicules." Hummel, Essais entomologiques, V, pref. p. [iii] (1826), wrote further in November, 1825 : — " On vienfc de m'informer que mon respectable compatriote, Monsieur Billberg de Stockholm, s'est trouve tres-offense des observations que j'ai hasardees sur son Enumeratio Insectorum, dans le Numero IV. de nies Essais, page 3, et qu'il y a reconnu autant d'ignorance que de mecbancete de ma part. Coinme il en juge ainsi, je dois m'avouer coupable d'avoir pris dans ces observations un ton qui ne convient point a un simple amateur de rEntoniologie, fort eloigne de pretendre a l'lionneur d'etre compte parrai les savans. La colere est la plus penible des sensa- tions, et si pour un moment j'en ai fait eprouver a Mr. Billberg, je m'empresse de lui en demander pardon publiquement et de tout mon coeur." Hagen, Stett. Ent. Ztg., V, 70, No. 17 (1844), wrote thus of "Die Sammlung des Kainmerrath Billberg. Seine erste Sammlung verbrannte bei einer Feuersbrunst. Eine spiiter an- gelegte verkaufte er iiacb England, und hat darauf eine dritte angelegt. Keine ist von bedeutendem wissenscbaftlicben Werthe gewesen, alle aber seblecht kon- servirt. Ein boebst unkritischer Catalog: Ennmeratio insectorum in museo Bill- berg, Stockholm, 1820, in Ito, ist. wohl kaum in den Bncbhandel gekommen." Hagen, Bibl. Ent. 1, 53 (1862), wrote further of the col- lections : — " Seine erste Sammlung, dcren Verzeiclmiss gedruckt ist, verbrannt 1822 bei einer Feuersbrunst (cf. Stett. Ent. Zeit., 1844, p. 70) ; eine zweite verkaufte er nach England an Children (jetzt ini Britt. Mus.);" and of their 'Enumeratio' : " Nach einem zum Theil eigentbiimliehen System, mit Angabe der Familien- Charactere." We may assume that Billberg's Enumeratio was published, and that the estimation of its scientific merit by his "compatriot" Hum- mel, in 1825, was that generally held at the time. We have also learnt from the above extracts that Billberg's library, and the col- lection of which his book was the " Enumeratio," were destroyed by fire in 1822. Calling Dr. Giinther's attention, in 1892, to Hagen's statement that Billberg's second collection was in the British Museum, he replied as follows : — 1903 ] 165 " I searched the old Departmental documents, with the object of learning what had become of Billbcrg's second collection, said by Hagen to have come into the British Museum through Children. Children was Assistant Librarian from 1816 — 1837, and Keeper of the Zoological Department from 1837—1840. He had a private collection of Insects, and seems to have bought Billbcrg's specimens, or at least part of them, for his private collection. I have found a (private) memorandum, dated September, 1829, on which a number of Coleoptera are enumerated, stated to be missing from Billberg's Museum. From this it is clear that he did not acquire all Billberg's types. When Children resigned in 1840, his collection was sold by auction, and a part of it purchased by the Museum. The specimens thus purchased we can still distinguish by our register-marks. Most probably some of Billberg's types are among them, but as Children stated on his labels only specific names, but not the origin of the specimens, we can recognize Billberg's specimens by circum- stantial evidence only, viz., when they bear a Billbergian species on an old Children- ian label. All these remarks refer to Coleoptera only ; I have no evidence that specimens of any other Order of Insects were transferred from Billberg's Museum to the British Museum, or even to Children's private collection. I wonder how Hagen got at the history of Billberg's collection." [Dr. A. Gunther, i. I., 12. VII. 1892.] Zetterstedt, Insecta Lapponica (1840), employed some of Bill- berg's genonyms, and he appears to Lave been the only Lepidopterist who adopted any of them before Scudder ; [Historic Sketch of the Generic Names proposed for Butterflies : a contribution to Systematic Nomenclature.— Pr. Am. Ac. Arts and Sc, Boston, X (2 s., II), 91-293. Salem (1S75)]. As it is through Scudder's work that these names have been revived in the Rhojmlocera, it is necessary that we should endeavour to ascertain on what grounds these genonyms were held to be valid by Scudder. Staudinger and Rebel, Cat. Lp. Pal., I, 14, No. 14 (1901), following Scudder, give " Leptidia, Billbg., 1820 (= Leucopliasia, Steph., 1827)," for sinapis, L. Scudder, Pr. Am. Ac. Art. Sc, Boston, X (2 s., II), 204, No. G12 (1875), records— "Leptidia. 1820. Billb. Enum. Ins., 7G, sinapis. Sole species, and therefore type. Never since used, but should certainly be re- stored. See Leptoria" [Wstwd., 1841], " and Leucophasia" [Stph., 1827]. Scudder (I. c, 204— 5) : " Leptosia. 181G. Hiibn., Verz. 95: sinapis (lathyri), Alcesta, Xiphia (chlorographa), Brephos. 1858. Kirb., List Brit. Rhop. : employs it for sinapis (candida, erysimi). 1870. Butl, Cist. Ent. i. 39, 54 : specifies sinapis (lathyri) as type, 166 [J«iy. but wrongly, as this was already the type of three different genera! See Leptidia. Sinapis was taken as type of Leptidia in 1S20, Bre- phos has belonged to Leueidia since 1847, Alcesta and Xipbia are congeneric, and Xiphia may be taken as the type. See Nina and Nychitona." Scudder (I. c, 205), " Leucophasia.* 1827. Steph., 111. Brit. Ent. Haust. i. 24 : sinapis. Sole species, and therefore type, as specified by Westwood (Gen. Syn. 87). Used in the same sense by many sub- sequent authors. Falls before Leptidia. See also Leptoria." Scudder (/. c, 201) : "Leptoria.* 1841. Westw., Brit. Butt. 31 : sinapis (candida). Sole species, and therefore type. Falls before Leptidia. See also Leucophasia and Leptosia, for the latter of which it was probably a misprint." Scudder overlooked entirely Stph., 111. Br. Ent., Haust. IV, 404 (1835): "244 Leptoiua (Leucophasia). 1001 Sinapis, 24, 5811" and therefore failed to understand that thero was no such genus as " Leptoria, AVstwd.," that Westwood was quoting from Stephens, who had written f Leptoiua [Hb.], Steph., in error for JLeptosia, lib., and that in 1835 Stephens intended to convey the idea that Leptosia, lib. (1818) [-\Leptoria (Hb.), Stph.] = Leucophasia, Stph. (1827), type, sinapis. Scudder proposes Xiphia for the type of Leptosia in 1S75, neglecting to observe that Stephens had made sinapis the type in 1835. If Leptidia be inadmissible this action must be studied by those interested in the Rhopalocera. [N.B. — Scudder quotes Billberg's genus as Leptidia, while our transcript gives the name as Leptidea. It is obvious that either Scudder or Durrant has wrongly copied this name, but this discre- pancy does not affect the argument.] As few of our readers can have had the opportunity of studying Billberg's Enumeratio, Leptidea may be taken as a typical example, and everything possibly relating to it is reproduced for those inter- ested in the subject, with the object that they may decide for themselves the question of the validity or invalidity of Billberg's names. " 2. Subclassis Astegopteba. Alis non tcctis. I. Ordo Lepidoptera : Aliis plerumque squauioso-imbricatis ; lingua spirali filiformi, rare nulla. I. Tribus Ephemerina : Alis quiescentiuni erectis : antennis cxtrorsim crassioribus, 1. capitatis. I. Nat. Papilionides. Tibiia posterioribus apice tantum calcaratus : tarsis diatincte unguiculatus. 1902.] 167 I. Divia. Peclibus omnibus, 6 gressorius ;" (Billbg., 1. v., 75). " 2. Subdiv. alis inferioribus pro abdomine canalein formantibus ;" " 2. Manip. alis oblongis. G. leptidea, Eg.— Pontia, Fbr., Ltr., &c. Sinapis. Svec. Linn. G. acaptera, Eg. — Papilio, Dr. (Typus Papilio crisia)." (Billbg., I. c, 7ti.) N.B. — Billbg., I. c, 76. — " I. Manip. Alis subtrigonis " sepa- rated " Glycestua Dim. (MSS.) ;" " Cepoua Dim. (MSS.) ;" " Ganyua Dim. (MSS.)," and " Gonrptera, Eg." {sic) — " Gone- ptertx, Lch. Ed. enc," &c, for " Rhemni " (sic) and " Cleopatra,'" from the two genera included in Manip. 2. [Those who hold inviolable, and established for all time, a name containing an obvious error in orthography are to be congratulated on the acquisition of GOHKPTEIIA a more recent acquisition is " flavib is." Is this to persist in this form or to be corrected to flavibasis ?]. It will doubtless be conceded by all that genonyms and idionyms are absolutely invalid, unless their application is comprehensible. It is a concession to the older writers that we accept a named but unde- scribed genus if its types are recognisable. The reason for this concession being that in the great proportion of their described genera the generic diagnosis being absolutely useless and unscientific, such genera are to all intents and purposes not described at all, and there- fore have no better claim to recognition than genera which were undescribed but illustrated by types. In both cases all we cau rely upon is the genonym and the types which elucidate it. Hiibner's Tentamen and Billberg's Enumeratio appear at first sight to require similar treatment— yet the two series of names, absolutely logonymic so far as each work is concerned, are quite dissimilar. The actual species intended by the type of Hiibner's Tentamen genera can be at once ascertained from his inconographic works. [If in any case the figure of a Tentamen type were unpublished at the date of the publication of the Tentamen, such genonym and idionym were mere logonymns until they were elucidated by the figure, and the genus only became completed and valid at the date on which the figure was published.] It must be granted by all that the Tentamen intention is capable of comprehension. Can the same be said of Billberg's Enumeratio ? Can it be argued that the mere citation of sinapis, L.," by Billberg 168 [July. 1902. elucidated Leptidea, Billbg. ? Billberg may or may not have correctly identified " sinapis, L.," but in any case his type of Leptidea was not Linnaeus' type of sinapis, but the species which was sinapis (L.), teste Billbg. How can we know that in Billberg's collection the actual expo- nent of rapes, L., may not have been " sinapis, Ego," and of sinapis, L.." rapes, Ego " ? Certainly Hummel does not give us much confidence in accepting Billberg's determinations, and Hummel was in a better position to judge than we can possibly be. It may of course be argued that Billberg could not be mistaken in his identification of Rhopalocera, but surely all his genera must stand or fall upon one and the same principle. We cannot accept " Bnosis Eg, — Tinea ol. muscatella, ISvec, Ebr.," as invalidating Incurvaria, Hw., one of the types of which is muscalclla, E., and if his authority cannot be justi- fied in one instance why should it be accepted in another (or others). The mere citation of a type without elucidation must involve a possible fallacy — we cannot therefore assume that doubt does not exist, in which case alone can citation be accepted as valid- muscatella (E.), teste Billbg., may or may not = rntiscalella, F. How can we decide the point ? Two examples gathered from Scudder may explain our position. Scdr., Pr. Am. Ac, AS., Boston, X (2 s., II), 170, No. 421 (1875), accepts. " Eulepis. 1820. Dalm. in Billb., Enum. Ins. 80: Athamas. Sole species, and therefore type;" the foundation being " Eulepis, Dim. (MSS.) — Nymphi- d'ium, Fbr. — Lemonias, 111. — Papilio et Hesperia, ol. Athamas" [sine loc. Drnt. MS.], " Eg., 36" (Billbg., I. c, 80). The species and genus were absolutely logonyms (nomina nuda) and absolutely incomprehensible, and yet Scudder accepts them from Billberg's Enumeratio ! Scdr. Pr. Am. As. A.S., Boston, X (2 s. II), 104, No. 28 (1875). " Aeropetes.* Billb., Enum. Ins. 79 : Liens (Licas), Tulbagliia. There is a Castnian with the name of the first species, and it is probably the insect meant by Billberg, although the species is Drury's,and not Fabricius's, as stated by the writer. The group as thus constituted, consists of wholly incongruous material, and may be discarded. See Meneris." This is the introduction of the personal equation on the part of Scudder, who does not like this particular Billbergian genus— but the geononym Aeropetes is as valid as any other of Billberg's names. According to Scudder (I. c, 21G, No. 6S0) : — August, 1902.] 1(]9 " Meneris. 1840. [Boisd. in] Doubl., List Br. Mus. 10f. : Tulbaghia. Sole species, and therefore type." limited the possible type of AEROPKTKS, Billbg. to Billberg's first idionym (whatever it may represent). Billberg, I. c, 70, writes thus: — "Aeeopetes Eg — Brassolis Fbr. — Papilio ol. Lieas, Surin. Fbr. Tulbagbia, Cap. b. sp. Linn." Licas (F.) teste Billbg. is identified with the Castnian IAcus, Drury. And yet the citation of sinopis, L., is accepted without question ! One further example must be quoted to demonstrate Scudder's wanton acceptance of mere logonyms (nomina nuda) as valid genonyms. Sedr. Pr. Am. Ac. A.S., Boston, X (2, s. II), 232, No. 766 (1875) :— " Ogyris. 1847. Doubl., List Br. Mus. 20 : Idmo, Abrota, Damo (all inedited). 1852. Westw., Gen. Diurn. Lep. 472 : Abrota, Idmo: the former is figured." " Since Doubleday's genus was undeseribed, and at the time when it was proposed all the species were inedited, the genus can only date from 1852, though it should bear Doubleday's name : at this time the only published species was Abrota, and this therefore must be the type. Idmo was not published until 18G2, and Damo is still a MS. name." Indexing Scudder's record, we obtain the following results : — OGYRIS, Wstwd. [= Ogyris, Dbld, MS.}. Type, Ogyris abrota, Wstwd. (Wstwd, 1852). Ogtbis [Dbld., List Br. Mus., 20, LN.~\, Wstwd., Gen. Diurn, Lp., 472 (1852). 1 (Type), abrota (Dbld., LN.), Wstwd. 2. idmo (Dbld., LN.), Wstwd. It may be conceded that Doubleday invented all these names, but as he omitted to indicate their signification, they must surely be attri- buted to Westwood, who adopted Doubleday's invalid logonyms, and made them valid. [We have accepted Scudder's statement of this generic problem —if there are omitted facts— we are not responsible for such omission.] One other remark on the nomenclature of the Rhopalocera. Scudder, I. c, 238 — 40, recognises antiopa, L., as the type of Papilio, L. Those who are interested in this question should note an omission from his references — Wood, 111. Linn. Gen. Ins., II, 4—6, PI. 43 (1821), specifies and figures urticae, L., which anticipated Scudder's citation of antiopa, L. (1872). To return from Scudder and those who accept Billberg's genera to Billberg's " Enumeratio," we are compelled to express our opinion 170 [August, that Billberg's book is no more than what it professes to be, viz. : " Enumeratio Insectorum in Museo Gust. Joh. Billberg," and we have been unable to discover a single genus which can be accepted as valid, all the species are obviously invalid when signed "Eg.," and the re- mainder are open to doubt. We cannot accept Billberg's Enumeratio as coming within the requirements of our code of rules — and empha- sise Hummel's regret that any copy of it escaped the fire of 1822. {To be continued) ELLAMPUS TRUNCATUS, Dahlb., CONFIRMED AS BRITISH. BY THE REV. F. D. MORICE, M.A , F.E.S. In Ent. Mo. Mag., 1900, p. 107, T mentioned the existence of a specimen of Ellampus truncatus, Dhlb., in Walcott's collection, now the property of the Cambridge University Museum. I could then say only that I " hoped " it might safely be treated as an addition to the British list, but I have now definite evidence that E. truncatus is really a British insect. Mr. A. II. Hamm, of Oxford, has sent to me for identification what is undoubtedly a specimen of the same insect. It was taken by Mr. W. Barnes on June 30th, 1901, in a garden at Southern Hill, Beading. The captor said that it appeared to be running in and out of holes in a rose tree trained against the wall of a house, and that he met at the same time with specimens of Trypoxylon jigulus, Linn., and clavicerum, Lep., Ellampus auratus, Linn., and Chrysis cyanea, Linn. It seems very likely that one of the above two Fossors was the "host," or rather " victim," of the E. truncatus, and perhaps also of the auratus, which latter, I believe, infests several species of pith- burrowing Fossors. (C cyanea is also said by M. du Buysson to be attached to various species of Trypoxylon and Cemonus, and I have generally found it about old gate posts inhabited by Trypoxylon, CheJostoma, Osmia, &c, but on one occasion lately I was surprised to meet with it, along with C. neglecta and C. viridula, haunting the sandy burrows of Odynerus spinipes). I have already {I.e.) given the characters by which E. truncatus may be distinguished from our other British Chrysids ; and will therefore only add that the present specimen has been placed in the collection of the Oxford University Museum (Hope Department), and that I am indebted to Mr. Hamm for the details given above respecting its capture. Woking : July, 1902. 1902.] 171 THE CONCEALED VENTRAL SEGMENTS AND GENITAL ARMATURE OF ANDRENA FEROX, Smitit, $ . BY THE REV. F. D. MORICE, M.A., F.E.S. I have long wished, but had almost ceased to hope, for an oppor- tunity of dissecting the above extraordinarily rare bee, in order to compare its "armature," &c, with those of the other species of Andrena which I have examined. At last, through the kindness of Mr. A. J. Chitty, such an opportunity has been given me. He has been good enough to let me extract the parts in question from an almost fresh specimen taken by himself near Faversham ; and although the result has a little disappointed me, I think it is very desirable to record it. I had expected something decidedly abnormal in the interior structure of a species whose external characters are so striking and singular. Both the genitalia (stipites and sagittae) and the Sth ventral segment of the somewhat similar A. bucephaht, Sm., are highly para- doxical, and I had thought it likely that those oi ferox would be even more so. On the contrary, they prove to be particularly simple! They resemble very closely those of A. roses. The armature is a little broader and rounder as a whole, but the details of its structure are closely analogous in the two species. The 8th ventral segments also are very alike ; only m ferox the apex is scarcely bifid, while in rosea var. Trimmerana it is very strongly so ; and though the character is less conspicuous in var. spinigera (which, \We ferox, has a large head, a spined gena, and a rufescent abdomen) it is at least distinctly in- dicated. The 7th ventral segment in ferox again recalls that of rosce ; the " teeth " at its apex, however, seem rather more parallel and sepa- rated by a wider notch, but the difference is so slight that (with only one specimen of ferox before me) I should hesitate to lay much stress upon it. Another large headed (non-British) species much resembles ferox in the points of structure mentioned above ; this is megdcephala, Smith, a species whose male has a strong external similarity to buce- phala, agreeing with it, and differing h'oxw ferox, in having the genre simple. If I am right in thinking that the characters of the armature and the concealed ventral segments in Andrena . species ought to be seriously considered in attempting to arrange the latter in groups, it would seem that ferox, meqacepltala, and roses (together with various forms which continental authors generally separate from the latter, o 2 172 [August, but which Mr. Saunders treats as mere varieties of it, spinigera, eximia, austriaca, &c.) should be regarded as very near relations, while bucephala, being utterly unlike any of them, both in its armature and its 8th ventral segment, can hardly be admitted to a place in the same group. But I quite feel that the special attention I have given to these characters, and the interest I have come to take in them, may make me exaggerate their importance. As to the fact, however, that in these points ferox closely re- sembles rosce, &c, and does not in the least resemble bucephala, there can be no doubt whatever, and I therefore put the fact on record, be its interpretation what it may. Woking : July, 1902. A REMARKABLE INSTANCE OF DELIBERATION OBSERVED IN AN AMERICAN ANT. BY C. R. OSTEN SACKEN, Ph.D., Hon. F.E.S. It was in Albany, N. T., more than forty years ago, that I found myself confined during a rainy day in a small hotel room with white- washed walls. I soon noticed a small brown ant walking upon the wall, and it occurred to me to follow its path by drawing it with a lead pencil. The line thus drawn by me ran upwards for a certain distance, and then, in a broad curve, turned towards the right. The next morning I saw an ant of the same kind follow the same path ; as I had some ether with me I put a small drop of it upon the pencil- line which I had traced the day before, but at a considerable distance in advance of the approaching ant; as soon as the ant smelt the ether it abandoned the path, turned to the left, and changed its mode of progress. Instead of going straight ahead, it now moved in zig-zags, making gradually longer those branches of the zig-zags which were directed towards the right. By adopting this course the ant again met, by and by, the line I had traced ; it recognised immediately what seems to have been the highway for ants travelling on that wall, and followed it to the end. It is evident that in this instance the ant, in recognising its road, was guided neither by its eyesight, nor by its sense of touch, but by the sense of smell, or some sense akin to it. But the resolute action of the ant in quitting a path which it could no more follow, and retrieving it afterwards, at another place, by a different and well considered course of progress, offers, it seems to me, a remarkable instance of the power of deliberation in an insect. It is probable that most ants, in a certain degree, possess this power. ^ 1002.] 173 Not being a specialist in myrtnecology, I am not able to give the scientific name of the ants which I saw, nor to appreciate the degree of importance which specialists in that family may attach to my observation. 8, Bunsen Street, Heidelberg, Germany : June, 1902. ON NFXEOPHILUS CORSICUS, Marsh., AN ADDITION TO OUR FAUNA, WITH A DESCRIPTION OF THE MALE. BY CLAUDE MORLEY, F.E.S., <&c. Two male and two female specimens of a species of Ichneumonidce in my collection 1 had referred to the genus Nyxeopliilus, Forst., with a doubtful reference to Xylonomus rusticus, Desv., before the publica- tion of the Rev. T. A. Marshall's paper on the above species in this Magazine for last December. Since that time Mr. Bignell has kindly allowed me to examine the type of N. corsicus in his collection, and the above specimens, all of which were taken in the New Forest, probably at Lyndhurst, by Miss Chawner and Mr. Fred. C. Adams, between May 18th and 31st, are identical therewith ; Mr. Adams has just sent me another female from the same locality, taken in early June. They differ in no way from the typical example, excepting only that the wings are somewhat less deeply tinged with glaucous colouring. Xylonomus rusticus, Desv., I find, upon reference to the National Collection, to be quite a distinct insect ; there are, nevertheless, seven specimens of N. corsicus in the British Museum, two females (labelled " reluctator ") and one male "ex col. Ste. ;" and two female and two male "ex col. Desv.," all under the name of Echthrus reluctator, Linn. The (J , which appears to be undescribed, differs little from the ? , excepting in the conformation of the front legs. The antennae are slightly stouter and are longer than those of the $ , being 12 mm. in length. The mesonotum is more nitidulous with its notauli deeper. The abdomen is linear, ventrally plicate throughout, and apically subcompressed (resembling, except the basal segment, that of Linoceras macrobatus, Tasch.) ; the basal segment is narrower, more distinctly petiolar and equilateral than that of the ^ . All the legs, more especially the tarsi, are longer ; the front legs are nearly simple and extend to the areolet of the wing, they are piceous, with the femora except their apices, the trochanters and coxae, black ; the front tibia; are only very slightly and gradually inflated towards their apices ; and the first tarsal joint is strongly excised basally beneath. Length, 17 mm. Both sexes have the raetathoracic spiracles elongate-oval and not 174 (August, subcircular or ovate as in Echthrus. Mr. Marshall's "areola supero- niedia " is the "area basalis " of Thomson's Opusc. Ent., the postero- media being the hitter's areola, beyond which is the slightly reflexed transverse carina. The gastrocoeli are very small but distinctly oblique There is a distinct transverse constriction at the base of the tibial intumescence in both sexes, and the intermediate femora of the female are canaliculate above and below. The spiracles of the first segment, as 1 understand them, are within the lateral projections, which iu the type and my own examples are placed just before the middle, but are more conspicuous in the male. Mr. Marshall appears to have been mislead by a fossette situated on either side in the disco-lateral border behind the middle ; under the microscope these truly appear to contain spiracles, but, having met with no analogous formation and no trace of such a depression occurring in my examples, I am led to regard them as accidental in the type specimen. There can, 1 think, be no doubt that this species is correctly ascribed to Nyjceopliilus. Ashmead, whose generic character regarding the metathoracic costa? should be omitted, followed by Mr. Marshall, has placed this genus among the Pimplinte. To me this appears a less natural position than among the CRYPTiNiE, for in all the typical genera of the former group, e.g., Xorides, Xylonomus, Ischnoceros, &c, the mesosternum is entire, with no external sulcus. Iu Nyxeophilus and Echthrus, however, this sulcus, especially in the case of the former, is very deep and determinate, with, be it noted, an exactly pentagonal areolet. We have therefore to choose which of two sets of characters is the more important : Nyjceopliilus has the head tumidulous, quadrate; the labrum free (as indeed it is to a great extent in many Cryptids, e. g., C. obscurus, Or.) ; the notauli deep ; mesonotum not sloping an- teriorly and centrally depressed ; metanotum subexareolated, with but an apical costa ; the first abdominal segment is not conspicuously dilated centrally (much less so than in Ischnoceros) : and, above all, its spiracles are placed slightly before the middle — all which points relate it with the Xoridini. On the other hand, the elongate and (at apex) gradually attenuated antenna?, which bear in both sexes a broad pale band, consisting of six joints, placed not distinctly beyond the centre ; subpetiolate abdomen (especiall}' in $) ; the intumescence of the front tibia?, which very remarkably resembles that of Echthrus lancifer, Gr., and is approached by H yr/rocry ptus carnifecc, Gr., and signatorius, Fab. (having the spiracles of the first segment placed iu 1902.] !75 and not beyond the middle) as well as by Xylonomus, ? ? ; and above all the pentagonal areolet and distinctly sulcate sterna — are typical Cryptid characters. There can be no doubt that this genus, wherever placed, must be kept in close proximity with Echthrus {Macrocri/ptus) , which Professor Thomson has mingled with the Cryptin^e, wherein Nyxeophilus appears most naturally under his "c c c :" Head tumidous, cheeks buccate, vertex quadrate, clypeus bisinuate ; ? , front tibiae inflated and baeally constricted. These two genera may, as far as I am aware, be very simply separated thus : — Sulcus reaching base of mesosternuui ; ruetanotum with apical costa only... Nyxeophilus, Forst. Sulcus not reaching base of mesosternum ; ruetanoturn with basal costa only... Echthrus, Grav. Ipswich : June, 1902. THREE NEW LEPIDOPTERA FROM ADEN. BY E. MEYRICK, P.. A., F.Z.S. The three following apparently uudescribed species were included in a collection of Lepidoptera made at Aden by Mr. F. Muir, and submitted to me for identification by Dr. Sharp. The types are deposited in the University Museum of Zoology at Cambridge. PLTTSIADJ2. AcONTIA GEPHYRIAS, )l. Sp. ?. 32 mm. Head white, sides of forehead ferruginous. Palpi white, terminal joint and apex of second suffused with ferruginous. Thorax white, partially suffused with yellow. Abdomen white, base of segments orange. Fore-wings rather elongate, triangular, termen rather obliquely rounded, slightly waved ; light yellow, becoming deeper yellow in disc ; a thick dark ferruginous-fuscous longitudinal streak, mixed with whitish, extending from base through middle of disc, posteriorly suffusedly dilated and curved upwards to termen above middle, cut in this portion by two yellow streaks on veins ; a small ferruginous subcostal spot before three-fourths ; a black costal clot close before apex : cilia dark fuscous mixed with whitish, basal line dark ferruginous. Hind-wings prismatic-white, towards apex tinged with brassy- yellowish : cilia white, base yellowish. One specimen. Grammodes schematica, n. up. ? . 34 mm. Head ochreous-wliitish. Palpi ochreous- whitish, lower half of second joint fuscous. Thorax whitish-ochreous, sides mixed with dark fuscous. Abdomen ochreous-whitish, base of segments more ochreous. Middle tibiae ap- parently with only one spine. Fore-wings triangular, termen rather obliquely 176 [August, rounded, waved ; rather dark fuscous ; basal area mixed with whitish ; a moderately broad curved white fascia from two-fifths of costa to middle of dorsum, darker edged; a similar rather irregularly triangular blotch on middle of costa reaching half across wing, including a dark fuscous costal dot ; a white costal spot near before apex; a grey-whitish irroration towards termen ; a terminal series of blackish lunate dots : cilia fuscous, at apex and on lower half of termen white on outer half. Hind-wings with termen waved, obtusely angulated in middle; dark fuscous; basal half white except on median and subdorsal veins ; a rather narrow white terminal streak from apex to three-fourths of termen, interrupted by a moderate round blackish spot on angulation, beneath which is a cloudy blackish connected dot : cilia white, on angulation and tornus fuscous. One specimen. ckambim;. Argyria holocrossa, n. sp. £. 19 mm. llead and thorax prismatic-fuscous. Fore-wings elongate, narrow, posteriorly dilated, apex obtuse, termen rather obliquely bowed ; prismatic-whitish, irrorated witli fuscous and dark fuscous ; first line obscurely indicated by darker margins ; indistinct darker spots beyond first line below middle, and beneath costa beyond middle; a broad terminal baud of darker suffusion, more ochreous on termen, enclosing angulated second line, which is obscurely indicated by darker anterior margin, violet-tinged on upper half, and a subterminal violet-blue metallic line : cilia fuscous, with a darker basal line. Hind-wings prismatic-whitish ; a dark coppery-fuscous rather broad terminal fascia, narrowed to a point at tornus : cilia whitish, with a fuscous basal line. One specimen. Marlborough : July, 1902. 1'SUCID.E FROM THE DISTRICT OF THE LAO DE JOUX (SWISS JURA). BY ROBERT McLACHLAN, F.R.S., &c. In this Magazine (2), vol. x, February and March, 1S99, I gave an accuuut of my experiences in this district, with a list of the " Neuroptera " taken in July and August, 1S98. When writing on the Psocidae I said (p. 04) that " it had never been my lot to visit a district in which these insects were so poorly represented," and then enumerated five species, all, with one exception, limited to one or two examples of each. But in August, 1901, the Kev. A. E. Eaton visited the same district, going over part of the same ground, avoiding Le Pout, on the Lac de Joux, which 1 made my head-quarters, and, taking advantage of the extension of the railway since my visit, pushing on to Le Brassus, higher up the Orbe Valley (or Jouxthalj, a small town close to the French frontier. His experiences and my 1902.] 177 own do not coincide, showing how dangerous it is to generalize on the capabilities of any district from one flying visit. The discrepancy may probably be accounted for in more than one direction. July and the beginning of August are too early for Psocidce generally ; the season of 1901 may have been damper (these insects like a, certain amount of moisture, as favouring the growth of the minute fungi on which they principally feed) ; and, Anally, the localities were not in all respects identical. Mr. Eaton brought from the district precisely double the number of species that 1 found, in at least 35 specimens, and it is fair to assume that he made no very special search for them. The species he found are as follows : — Psocus (Amphigerontia) bifasciatus, Ltr. (1), Brassus, August 16th. Ps. nebulosus, Steph. (4), Yallorbe, August 13lh, and Brassus, August 17th. Ps. longicoknis, L, (0), " Source de l'Orbe," August 13th. Ps. sexpunctatus, L. (4), Cascade du Bay, August 12th, and Brassus, August 17th. Stenopsocus immaculatus, Steph. (1), " Source de l'Orbe," August 13th. Elipsocus (Mesopsocus) unipunctatus, Mull. (1), Brassus, August 17th. E. iirALiNcrs, Steph. (1), Brassus, August 10th. E. (Philotaesus) flaviceps, Steph. (many), Brassus, August 16th and 17th. Cecilius Bubmeisteki, Brauer (2), " Source de l'Orbe," August 13th. C. peklatus, Kolbe (1), Brassus, August 17th. Of the foregoing only Ps. longicornis and M. unipunctatus were found by me ; Ps.fasciatus, St. cruciatus, and E. abietis were found by me and not by Mr. Eaton. It may be taken for granted that many more species will be discovered in the district when it is systematically worked. A Swiss entomologist, Herr Eric Mory, of Basel, visited the district in August, 1898. He made important captures in Odonata, but does not appear to have found any Psocidce (cf. Mitth. schw. Entomol. Gesellschaft, x, pp. 187—197). Lewisham, London : June 22»d, 1902. Coleoptera caught in Ireland during Mag and June, 1902. — On May 19th I visited Greystones, near Bray, but did not secure many beetles worth mentioning : Chrysomela Banksi was common under stones, and a short series of Barypeithes sulcifrons and a single specimen of Barynutus ISch'6 nheri were obtained by sweeping. On the advice of Mr. J. N. Halbert, to whom 1 am much indebted for his kindness in showing me the best localities, I worked the North Bull, a sand bank near Dollymount, where 1 succeeded in capturing several nice species ; Aepus marinus occurred in abundance under the stones of the breakwater, and with them [August, two specimens of Diglossa mersa were found. Under seaweed Phytosus balticus, Oxytelus maritimm, and Cafius xantholoma were plentiful, with several Saprims marttimus and Aleochara grisea and obscure/la. Telephorus Darwinians was also found here under a stone. Cercyon littorale, var. binotatum, was fairly plentiful under seaweed and decaying vegetables. On June 3rd a single specimen of HcBmonia appendiculata was secured after several hours' hard work in the Royal Canal , Gyrinus marinus and opacus, Dero- nectes assimilis, and Hydroporus pictus occurred in the canal, and Donaeia discolor was plentiful on the rushes, all the forms except the bright blue being found. A visit to Baldoyle resulted in a series of Cillenus lateralis and a single speci- men of Polydrusus chrysomela. Broscus cephalotes was abundant here, and Dichirolnchus pubescens was in some numbers. Hydroporus rivalis swarmed in Gleucullen Valley, and H. obscurus tristis mono, and Gyllenhali were taken from the bog-pools on Mt. Kippure. At Portmarnock Otiorrhynohus auropunetatus was abundant, but, difficult to bring back in good condition, Bembidium asneum was fairly common, and Apion aneum, rufirostre, and radiolus were swept from mallow. Silpha atrata, var. subrotundata, and Tachyporus obtusus, var. nitidiusculus, were fonnd in several places near Dublin. On June 17th I went for three days to Lough Neagh, and had fairly good sport, in spite of the miserable weather. I visited the south-east corner of the lake, and my captures included nice series of Pelophila borealis, Chlamius nigri- corms,&nd Ccelambus quinquelineatus, two specimens each of Carabus clathratus Silpha dispar, and Rkopalomentes Tarda, sis Bembidium argenteolum (the species discovered by Mr. J. N. Halbert), B. bipunctatum, Blethisa multipunctata, Nebria Gyllenhah, Orectochilus villosus, Hylobius abietis, Staphyl inns pubescens and catsa- reus, and Cryptohypnus riparius. Deroneotes assimilis was abundant here with Hydroporus lepidus, lineatus hturatus, planus, &c, and one specimen of Ccelambus uovemlineatus was found! Dark forms of Pterostichus cupreus were plentiful. Of the rare water-bug, Aphelocheirus aestivalis, only a dead and broken speci- men could be found.-STANLEY W. Kemp, 80, Oxford Gardens, Notting Hill W ■ July, 1902. S ' " Ceuthorrhynchidius Bawsoni, Bris., in the Isle of Man. - After detailing localities for this species in " The Co/eoplera of the British Islands," Canon Fowler remarks that "it is probably much more widely distributed than is at present known, if we may judge from the Scotch record [Solway district (Sharp)] » At the end of June and beginning of July of the present year I met with this species in some numbers by shaking plants of Plantago maritima over a sweeping net on the cliffs at Berwick Bay and at Traie Veg, Port Erin. The species seemed to be entirely confined to this plant, although Plantago coronopus was plentiful in both localities. In the Annual Report for Session 1901 of the Lancashire and Cheshire Entomological Society I notice that amongst the exhibits of Coleoptera Dr. Chaster of Southport, showed this species as being new to the list for the Liverpool district.' —J. Haeold Bailey, Port Erin : July 3rd, 1902. 1902.] 17g Leptinus testaceus, Sfc, near Bradfield, Gnorimus nobilis near Toweester, and Meloe brevicollis from South Devon. — Perhaps the following beetles are of sufficient rarity to be worth recording. 1 have taken them myself during the last two years in this neighbourhood. Leptinus testaceus, Mull., five specimens in December, L900, and two in March, 1902, in nests of the wood mouse ; Liodes orbicularis, Herbst ; Necrophorus inter- ruplus, Steph. ; Bythiuus securiger, Reich. ; Saprinus virescens, Payk., the last by sweeping watercress ; Cryptarcha strigata, ¥., at a Cossus infected tree ; Phytwcia cylindrica, L. ; Cry otocephalus bipunctatus, L., C. coryli, L., several by beating whitethorn in June ; Malthodes atomus, Thorns. ; Lytta vesicatoria, L., one speci- men on a gate post. I also had sent to me last June from near Toweester two fine specimens of Gnorimus nobilis, L., taken from dead roses. This April 1 took one specimen of Meloe brevicollis, Panz., on the top of the cliff, Bolt Tail, in South Devon ; a most careful search in the neighbourhood re- vealed no more. — Norman H. Joy, Bradfield, near Reading : June 16th, 1902. Coleoptera at Rannoch.— An academic holiday of three days enabled me to spend the week end at Rannoch, from June 27th to 29th, and as I was lucky enough to pitch upon one of our rare spells of true summer weather, 1 captured several species not seen during my visit of 1900 (see Ent. Record, vol. xii, p. 288). In the Black Wood Cetonia fioricola, Host., was so common on a Cossus tree, and so busily engaged sucking at the exuding sap, that one sweep of my hand knocked about twenty into my net ; as the sun was shining brightly at the time upon the glistening mass of beetles the sight was a striking one, not the tiling one expects to see in a dark northern fir wood. After much wandering to and fro I came across a couple of woodcutters busy felling Scotch firs ; the fresh turpentine-covered stumps were very attractive to beetles, from the cracks of the bark Asemuni striatum, L., was freely taken, Rhagium indagator, L., and Clerus formicarius, L., were common running to and fro on the pi'ostrate trunks, while Corymbites impressus, F., and I'ytho depressus, L., occurred sparingly on the stumps. I beat the tops of all these felled trees, but only one turned out at all satis- factory ; from this came I'ogonocherus fasciculatus, De Gr., Rhinomacer attelaboides, F., Rityopthorus pubescens, Marsh, (the hist two in plenty), Elatvr nigrinus, Hbst., Salpingils castaneus, Pz., &c. Sweeping was not very productive, the best insects being Halyzia 16-guttata, L., Telephorus paludosus, Fall., Tropiphorus mercurialis, F., Rolydrusus undatus, F., Luperus Jlavipes, L., and llydrolhassa aucta, F. My visit was too hurried a one to allow time to work the moss or fallen logs, and I was too late for Aslynomus adilis ; the woodmen told me this beetle, so well known to them, had been excessively scarce this season, probably due to the bitterly cold and inclement weather which prevailed all through Scotland till past Mid- summer day. While cycling over from Struan station I obtained a fine specimen of Ancistronycha abdominalis, F., resting on a pine fence a mile or two from the station. — T. Hudson Bkabe, 10, Regent Terrace, Edinburgh : July 9th, 1902. Coleoptera, <.J'c, at Greenhithe and Charing, Kent. — A couple of days' collecting at the end of May in the Greenhithe district (which is mainly one of orchards, 180 [August, plantations, and hop-gardens, intersected by apparently interminable lanes) produced, amongst commoner species, single specimens of Bembidium ^-striatum and Amara consular is, the former running on a path, the latter under a stone ; a good series of Bembidium don's at the sides of a pond, and plenty of Aphthona venustula, and a few Pxylliodes dulcamara by sweeping their respective food-plants. I also got a number of Liparus coronatus by searching Anthriscus sylvestris, on which it lives ; they were buried in the soft earth at the roots of the plants, two or three to each root. A welcome capture was a specimen of Otiorrhynchus raucus, swept from a mass of Lamium album at the side of a field. Amongst a number of Phyllobius oblongus I was interested to find an individual with the left deciduous mandible remaining ; this is broader, and at the same time more sharply pointed at apex than those of the specimen of Trachyj/hlwus myrmecophilus, which I exhibited at a meeting of the Entomological Society in October last, and is armed with a distinct tooth on the inner side near base. It is known that these appendages differ in shape, length, &c, in the various genera which possess them, and I think that British Coleopterists might well keep a look out for specimens retaining them, so that these variations might be noted. At any rate, these deciduous mandibles represent a portion of the life-history of the species, and specimens in which one or both are intact should have an additional value, from that point of view, to any one fortunate enough to come across them. Amongst the Heteroptera, the handsome Lygseids, Aphanus Rolandri and A. pedestris, were not uncommon under refuse and running in the lanes, and I also swept three specimens of Ey.sarcoris melanocephalus from umbels. At the end of June I had the pleasure of a day's collecting with Mr. A. J. Chitty on the chalk hills above the village of Charing. The weather was warm and sunny, and there having been rain the previous evening insects were about in some numbers. Amara patricia and Panag&us quadripustulalus turned up singly under stones, and a pair of Rhi iwncus denticollis close to a small Erodium plant. Tychius Schneideri was not uncommon on Anthyllis, and a few of another species, apparently T. tomentosus, occurred about the roots of various small plants, in which situations also the sluggish and inconspicuous Trachypklceus alternans and T. squamulatus were not rare. From some stunted hazel bushes we were delighted to get a series each of Cryptucephalus lineola, a really beautiful insect as it sits on the leaves in the sunshine. In some woods a short distance away I was glad to meet with Apoderus coryli for the first time ; it was by no means common, and in Mr. Chitty's experience has always been a scarce insect in his neighbourhood. I noticed one individual on chestnut ; this may have been accidental, but in view of the recent records of Attelabus having taken to this tree I have thought it ju6t worth mentioning. — F. B. Jennings, 15, Silver Street, Upper Edmonton, N. : July 12th, 1902. Coleoptera in Miller's Dale. — I have recently taken a good series of the fol- lowing Coleoptera in Miller's Dale, in my district : Ancistronycha abdominal is, Podabrus alpinus, and Phyllobius viridicollis. Should these be desiderata to any of our brother Coleopterists I shall be glad to distribute them as far as my dupli- cates will allow. — J. Kidson Taxlok, 2, South Terrace, South Avenue, Buxton ; July 10th, 1902. 1902.] 181 Osphya bipunctata, Fabr., in East Gloucestershire. — On the 31st May and two following days T obtained here several examples of this speeies ; of these twenty-four percent, were large males, that is, males with enormously thickened hind femora, sixty-six per cent were small males with the hind legs normal, and ten per cent. were females. The large males bore a very close resemblance, both in gait and appearance, to Telephorus pellucidus, which occurred with them very commonly. I did not recognise in the field the first small male that I got, but bottled it under the impression that it was an unusually bulky example of Orammoptera rujicornis ; which latter, however, occurred then but rarely. The males were confined to two non-contiguous whitethorn hushes, whilst one female came off holly, and the other from oak ; the whitethorn was not actually in bloom until a week later. I had no reason to believe that these insects clung to their shelter-plant with any especial tenacity, as stated by Curtis and later writers ; the former was evidently much impressed by the peculiar development of the hind legs in the large males, and he appears to have considered that the alleged tenacity was to be accounted for by their abnormal structure ; my own observations, however, did not furnish any- thing tending to confirm this view. When the knee of the hind leg in these large males is flexed, and the inner edge of the hind tibia brought close to the femur, the spine-like process at the apex of the tibia fits into a cavity in the trochanter and locks the limb in that position, which is one distinctly favourable to the gripping of some object of very small size, but scarcely for holding " very fast to a leaf or branch," as suggested by Curtis. A similar structure is found in the males of (Edemera nobi/ix and Oncomera femorata, and its function, which is doubtless the same in all three species, would appear to be connected with sexual intercourse. I am inclined to this view by the fact that I have not found any of the species mentioned abnormally difficult to dislodge, and moreover, in Elmis and its allies, where the faculty of clinging is obviously intensified, that end is obtained by the greater development of the claw-joint of the tarsus. The males of Osphya are well- known to vary much in size ; my smallest example is but 5 mm. long, whilst my largest has a length of 14 mm., and is stoutly built in propoi'tion. — J. Edwards, Colesborne, Cheltenham : YJth June, 1902. On the pairing of Homalota liturata, Steph. — Amongst an immense number of small beetles which T shook from a living Polyporus in a wood hereon June 24th last year, was something that attracted my attention by reason that it was twice as large as the others, and had a large extent of upturned abdomen. On close examination in a glass-covered box this proved to be two small Staphs with the extremities of their abdomina in contact, and both moving very rapidly forward in the same vertical plane, but neither of them wholly superimposed. The hinder one had the front part of its head closely applied to the base of the hind legs of the one in front and its abdomen curved over its back to the fullest extent to meet the tip of the abdomen of the other. The venter of the abdomen of the front one was in contact with the upper surface of the hinder one as far as the apex of the elytra of the latter. The movements of the conjoined insects were so rapid that I could not determine the relative position of the sexes, nor whether their position was main- tained by reason of the operation of the hind legs of the front one or the jaws of the hinder one, or both of those means. — Id. 182 [August, The Porcupine Louse. — Mr. Emerson Atkins has brought me specimens of Trichodectes setosus, Griebel, found on a porcupine (Erethizon epixanthus, Brandt.) shot at Las Vegas, New Mexico. I believe this is the first Mallophagan to be re- corded from New Mexico (though of course they are actually numerous), and it seems that T. seloms has not been recorded from this species of porcupine. — T. D. A. Cockerell, East Las Vegas, New Mexico, U. S. A. : June, 1902. Alomoscelis pilosnlits, Uhler,in Arizona. — This Capsid bug (kindly determined by Mr. O. Heidemann) was observed by me at the end of March on leaves of Atrip/ex at Tempe, Arizona. The Atriplex leaves are greyish-green, with a peculiar lustre, all of which is imitated by the bug to perfection. — Id. Strachia oleracea, Linn., in East Kent. — I swept a single specimen of this fine bug on the afternoon of June 29th, after a shower of rain. It was in a bed of mixed nettles and thistles, growing in what was the garden of a now disused cottage about a quarter of a mile from here. — A. J. Chittt, Huntingfield, Faversham : July 2nd, 1902. Newspaper Entomology. — When we read the ludicrous remarks on insects occasionally appearing in English newspapers we need not be surprised at similar remarks appearing in those of the Colonies, where entomology is not much studied, and entomological literature is not easily accessible. The attached clipping is from the "Southland Times," N.Z., and seems to me worth reprinting in an entomological journal. " A moth of unusual size for this part of New Zealand has been sent to us by a Thornbury resident, who captured it there last Saturday. The wings, extended, measure nearly five inches from tip to tip, and the body is about an inch and a half long. J. C. Westwood, F.L.S., in his introduction to the " Modern Classification of Insects," plainly indicates the species as belonging to the family of the Cicadidce in the order Homopetra. This is the largest insect of the order, one species measuring between six and seven inches in the expanse of its wings. The head is shortly described as short, broad, and transverse, with large prominent eyes ; posterior slightly spined without terminal spur; wings completely membranous and delicately transparent ; body convex ; four wings." The insect referred to is a magnificent specimen of Sphinx convolvuli, fortunately secured by, and now in the collection of, Mr. Gk W. Howes, F.E.S., of Invercargill, N.Z. Coming nearer home, the " Ashburton Guardian " lately announced that a settler at Omihi informed the correspondent of the " Oamaru Mail " the other day that his turnip crops had suffered badly this season from the grubs of humble bees. The " grubs " committing the ravages in his turnip crops were those of Melanchra (Mamestra) niutans and M. composita, both of whose almost omnivorous larvae attacks the roots of almost every farm crop. Both these species have been extremely abundant this season. — W. W. Smith, Ashburton, N.Z. : May 19th, 1902. Andrenaferox, Smith, other Aculeata Hymenoptera, and Stylops melitta>, Kirby, in East Kent. — This Whitsuntide I had the good fortune to take close by here a 1902.] 183 pair of Andrena ferox, Smith. The ? was caught on May 22nd, flying along the bottom of a hedge. The and 7, I saw what I was con- vinced was the species in large numbers flying in a mazy manner close over the surface of the water where it was shallow and the ripple great. My net stick was far too short to reach them, but, by patient waiting, I secured one example, enough to confirm my belief. So much for my own experience. The species is no doubt common on the lower part of the Axe, and on the Avon at Ringwood and Christ- church ; possibly on many other streams of a similar nature. If is an elegant insect, owing to its extraordinarily long antenmr and maxillary palpi. I do not here propose to say anything about its continental distri- * Since the above was in type Mr. Porritt has informed me that he received examples taken by the late Mr. J. E. Fletcher on the Teme at Worcester. I do not think Mr. Fletcher made any record at the time, but the species is no doubt included in his List in the " Victoria " County series, of which I have not yet seen " Worcestershire."--R. McL. 1902.] 213 bution, which is certainly very wide. But I regret not having placed examples of both sexes in alcohol, because I have reason to think that my figures ("Rev. and Synopsis") are susceptible of improve- ment, and it is very difficult to define the complicated anal parts in dry individuals. Furthermore, a fresh study of T. interna, McLach., from Turkestan, is probably necessary. Of this latter I have 2 <$ and 3 ? . In one <$ the anal parts agree fairly well with my figure ("Rev. and Synopsis") ; in the other there is more resemblance to T. conspersa. I may add that in conspersa I have reason to believe that, in the branched inferior appendages of the <$ , one branch is mobile and capable of extension in a thumb-like manner. Lewisham, London : August IMh, 1902. DRAGON-FLIES (INCLUDING 1SCHNURA PUMILIO AND AORION MERCURIALS IN ABUNDANCE) AND OTHER NEUROPTERA IN THE NEW FOREST. BY GEO. T. POttKITT, F.L.S. From June 18th to July 1st last I spent at Brockenhurst in company with Mr. T. Ashton Lofthouse, of Middlesbrough. The immediate object of my own visit was to collect Ischnura pumilio, Agrion mercuriale, and other New Forest dragon-flies ; but Mr. Loft- house devoted bis time to the Lepidoptera. Acting on instructions kindly given to me by Mr. W. J. Lucas, the morning after our arrival I readily found the locality for Isch. pumilio and Agrion mercuriale, and very soon saw that both species were in abundance, and they became still more so in better weather a few clays later. I could indeed have taken almost any number had I wanted them. Both species flew together, though, as Mr. Lucas had already recorded, pumilio seemed more partial to swampy ground, whereas mercuriale, although also occurring freely in the swamp, was perhaps more plenti- ful on the clear streams which ran through the boggy ground. The bright orange-yellow variety, aurantiaca,oi the ? of pumilio, seemed much more plentiful than what is considered the ordinary form of the $ , and was very pretty. A few Agrion puella occurred among the mercuriale, but it did not take long to enable one to detect the difference, even when on the wing ; and although an occasional Isch. elegans occurred with the pumilio, it was quite a rarity on that piece of ground, which I may add was of considerable area. Another 214 [September, local species which occurred freely with them was Pyrrhosoma tenel- lum, and of it, a dark bronzy form of the ? , which does not seem to occur in the Surrey localities of the species, was common. On a broad stream the pretty Gomphns vulgatissimus was so common that on one day I think I must have seen at least forty specimens ; and with it Oordulegaster annulatus was not at all rare. The fine Anax imperator occurred, bul probably we did not come across its head quarters ; and, on one pond at least, Libellula quadrimaculata was in numbers. One or two specimens of a large species, probably JEschna juncea were hawking on a heath, but we failed to catch an example. The pretty Platycnemis pennipes abounded, and in great variety, numbers being ivory-white, with dark transverse markings, and many of the loveliest sky-blue, with longitudinal marks. Of the larger species, the most abundant was undoubtedly Orthetrum ca^rulescens, yet although so plentiful, it was evidently only just well out on our arrival, as all the J s were then brown, not a blue one to be seen. A few days sufficed to bring them to the adult colouring, when the blue <$ s were plentiful enough. Platetrum depressum was, of course, every- where, and the blue <^s of it also became more abundant day by day; the gorgeous Calopteryx virgo flitted in plenty about all the larger streams ; but, curiously, G splendens was never seen. Lastly, it need scarcely be added that Pyrrhosoma nymphula was plentiful enough. Of Planipennia, Raphidia notata, Hemerobius stigma and H. concinnus occurred, the last in plenty, but all of the brownish form ; Chrysopa alba, O. tenella, C. ventralis, and C. perla, the last two in plenty ; Panorpa communis, &c. The only Perlidce noticed were Isop- teryce tripunctata and Nemoura variegata. Nothing of any note turned up from the little work done among the Trichoptera. These included Phryganea grandis ? , one ? only, at sugar ; Glyphotcelius pellucidus, not uncommon ; Limnophilus rhom- bicus, L. griseus, L. auricula, L. centralis, L. luridus, the last abundant, Micropterna lateralis, common ; Sericosfoma personatum, Goera pilosa, common ; Leptocerus cinereus, abundant, Mystacides nigra, &c. Crosland Hall, Huddersfield : August I3tk, 1902. AQUATIC OETROPTERA IN CEYLON. BY E. ERNEST GREEN, F.E.S., Government Entomologist, Ceylon. I see in a report of Proc. Ent. Soc. (in July number of Ent. Mo. Mag.) a note about Aquatic Orthoptera, the occurrence of such forms being considered peculiar. We have in Ceylon a large group of 1902.] 215 aquatic Acridians, of the family Tettigidce, e. g., Scelimena harpago, Serv., and allied species. This species in particular has the hind tibia and tarsus laterally expanded for swimming. The insect fre- quents the mountain streams of Ceylon, resting on the wet rocks in mid-stream. When disturbed they leap without hesitation into the water, and either swim to another rock, or dive to the bottom, often re- maining there for a considerable period. I remember on one occasion observing the larva of some Tettix walking about amongst the dead leaves at the bottom of a shallow pool. Gavalidium crocodilus, Serv., is another species that frequents wet rocks ; but I have uever seen this insect actually take to the water. Peradeniya, Ceylon : July 28th, 1902. ON A CICADINE NEW TO BRITAIN. BY JAMES EDWARDS, F. E. S. LlMOTETTIX STACTOGALA. Stactogala, Amyot, Ann. Soc. Eut. Fr., xv, p. 21.7 ; id., Meth. Mon., p. 413 (1847). Opsins stactogalus, Fieber, Neue Gatt. und Art. iu Horn., p. 9, t. vii, f. 19 (1866). Thamnotettix tamaricis, Kirschbaum, Cicad., p. 90 (1868). Athysanus stactogala, Ferrari, Cicad. agri Ligust., pp. 54 — 57 (1882) ; Melichar, Cicad. Mitt. Eur., pp. 258—261 (1896). Upper fore-parts shining yellowish-green, elytra dull leek-green with rnilk- whito spots. Crown evenly rounded in front, not longer in the middle than at the sides, in the male three times, in the female three and half times, as broad as long. Frontal suture from the antenna to the elypeus but little more than half as long as the distance between the antennae. Clavus and corium dull leek-green, with more or less of the costal area, and a varying number of small irregular spots, milk-white, veins dark green ; membrane milk-white, the second apical area and parts adjacent, with the veins, reddish-fuscous. Face, legs, and under-side pale green ; spines of the hind tibiae white. Abdomen above black, with the sides narrowly pale. Length (including elytra), 5 mm. I am indebted to Mr. E. A. Butler for the opportunity of re- cording this interesting addition to the British fauna ; the specimens were taken by Mr. H. L. F. Guennonprez in August, 1901, at Pagham Harbour in S.W. Sussex, where old-established plants of Tamarix, the food-plant of the species, grow abundantly : it is a species of South European distribution, and doubtless introduced into this country with its food-plant. This insect has at various times been S 2 216 [September, treated as an Athysanus or Tkamnotettitv, but in the limitation of genera which I have adopted it falls readily into the genus Limotettix, J. Sahl., forming with L striola, Fall , a section in that genus dis- tinguished from the remaining species by having the crown broadly rounded in front, but little longer in the middle than at the sides, and about three times as broad as long. It has, however, no near ally amongst the British Cicadina, and though its distinctive features are mainly those of facies and colour-pattern, it would, perhaps, be better placed in a separate genus ; in which case the name Opsins, Fieber, is available. It is probable that in life all the green parts of the insect are of the same tint as the elytra of the specimens before me. Colesborne, Cheltenham : July 'AQth, 1902. L&MOSTENUS COMPLANATUS, Dej., IN IRELAND: AN ADDITION TO THE BRITISH FAUNA. BY STANLEY W. KEMP, F. E. S. When looking over a box of beetles which T had caught during a stay in Ireland, Mr. E. A. Waterhouse drew my attention to the fact that some specimens which 1 had taken to be L. (Pristonychus) ter- ricola, Herbst, did not belong to that species. These, on further examination, proved to be Lcemostenus complanatus, D e j . , a species which I am thus pleased to add to the British list. This insect appears to have an extremely wide range, being recorded from S. France, Portugal, Italy, Barbary, Madeira, St. Helena, Bermuda, and Chili. It is on the whole a smaller insect than P. terricola, the thorax is less contracted behind, and the elytra are more parallel-sided ; there are wings under the elytra (P. terricola is apterous), and the legs are considerably shorter. The specimens, some two dozen in number, were found under the stones of a fallen wall, on sandy soil near the sea, about three miles from Nelson's Pillar, Dublin, last June. I am indebted to Mr. E. A. Waterhouse for assistance in identification. 8U, Oxford Gardens, Netting Hill, W. : August, 1902. [This 8. European insect, which appears to be almost cosmopo- litan, will probably be found mixed with P. terricola in British collections, as I find I have two of it from Chatham, captured by Mr. J. J. Walker in IS 71. It is a common species at Gibraltar, and ou 1902] 217 the opposite N. African coast, as well as in Algeria, &c. The generic name is often written Lcemoslhenes. — G. C. C] A NEW EUROPEAN SPECIES OF PTEROPITORID.E. BY E. MEYBICK, B.A., F.Z.S. In August, 1900, 1 spent a fortnight at Saas-ITee, in the Valais, Switzerland, which lies at an elevation of over 0000 feet, and carefully collected all the obtainable Lepidoptera from 5000 up to 9000 feet. Amongst them was the following species, which appears to be un- described. Platyptilia leucobbhyncha, n. sp. ? . 18-19 mm. Head white, mixed with wlutish-ochreous, frontal tuft 1. Palpi 2£, whitish-ochreous, terminal joint long, tip white. Antennae white, ringed with fuscous. Thorax whitish, mixed with light brownish-ochreous. Abdomen whitish, mixed witli ochreousand fuscous. Legs white, banded with reddish-fuscous. Fore-wings formed as in gonodactyla, therefore more elongate than in tesseradaclyla ; ochreous-whitish, more ochreous-tinged towards base ; costal edge fuseous-mixed from base to beyond middle ; an outwardly oblique fuscous spot on dorsum at |, reaching half across wing; an undefined fuscous spot in disc just before middle ; a narrow wedge-shaped fuscous spot along dorsum from before middle to f ; a tri- angular dark brown blotch on costa before fissure, reaching § across wing, outer edge slightly concave ami less oblique than termen ; a moderate dark brown subterminal fascia, and narrower brown terminal fascia, separated by a narrow streak of ground colour: cilia white, base on termen light brown edged with a dark fuscous line, on dorsum with a moderate projection of black-tipped scales at f, and a smaller one at i. Hiud-wings rather dark fuscous, slightly reddish-tinged ; cilia pale brownish, on dorsum whitish-mixed at base, with a large projection of black-tipped scales in middle, and two or three similar scales near base of wing. Three specimens taken in a deep wooded gully below Saas-Fee in August, at 5300-5500 feet ; amongst rough herbage in which a large Senecio and a Petasites grew luxuriantly, to one or other of which this species is probably attached. Most allied to P. tessera- daclyla, with which it nearly corresponds in size, but more elongate- winged ; agreeing also in the position and characters of the scale- projections of hind-wings, but certainly distinct by the much longer frontal tuft, a reliable character ; the palpi are also much longer, and the dark costal blotch before fissure is quite differently formed ; finally, the prominent development of the ochreous-white ground colour in the head and fore- wings distinguishes it at once superficially from this, and (combined with the small size) from all other European species of the genus. Elmswood, Marlborough : July 24th, 1902. 218 September, RHIZOTROGUS OCHRACEUS, Enoch, CONFIRMED AS BRITISH. BY DK. D. SHARP, M.A., F.R.S. Mr. C. Gr. Lamb, the Dipterologist, while, in Cornwall last month wrote me that a Rhizotror/us was flying there in the daytime. Knowing from continental experience that this is the habit of R. ochraceus, I asked him to bring two or three examples, thinking it just possible the Cornwall " dor " might prove to be this great rarity. He has accordingly kiudly given me five specimens that are this much-wished- for beetle. Fowler says of it : " Very rare ; Holyhead, Wales (Stevens and Brewer) ; one specimen recorded by Stephens from pro- bably Derbyshire or Yorkshire." In the Cornwall locality the insect is not uncommon, but we shall have to wait till another year for a supply of it. As already remarked it flies in the daytime. R. solstitialis is abundant in the same locality, and, as usual, flies in the evening. Probably any one finding a Rhizotrogus flyiug in the west at mid-day will be in posses- sion of this insect. Cambridge : August 12th, 1902. Bembidium argenteolum, Ahr., at Lough Neagh. — The circumstances of the discovery of B. argenteolum, together with a description of this interesting addition to our British Coleoptera, will be found in the List of the Beetles of Ireland com- piled by Mr. J. N. Halbert and myself, and published in the Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 3rd Series, vol. vi, No. 4. I had not an opportunity of revisiting the place of its capture until last month, when Mrs. Johnson and I spent a day on the shores of Lough Neagh, and at Ardmore again met with the beetle. The day was dull and cloudy and the water very high, so that it was difficult to find it. After a good deal of work we managed to take a dozen. The beetles are found on sandy and shingly parts of the shore, and hide either just below the surface of the sand or under small stones. As soon as the sun shone out they began to emerge from their hiding places. Along with these Bembidia we took Dyschirius obscurus, Pelophila boreal is, anil Hil/iha dispar; insects were, however, very scarce. There is a specimen of Bembidium argenteolum in the collection of the late Robert Patterson, F.R.S. , of Belfast, which is labelled " Shane's Castle, 1831." It is interesting to note that seventy years afterwards, viz., in 1901, a grandson of this gentleman, also named Robert Patterson, should be the finder of another addition to the liBt of British Coleoptera, viz., Stenus jjalposus, Zctt. (vide Johnson and Halbcrt's List of the Beetles of Ireland, p. b'65), and that the discovery should also be made on the shore of Lough Neagh, though at a different part, near Toome. B. argenteolum has also been taken by Mr. II. L. Orr, of Belfast, at Glenavy, Co. Antrim, on the eastern shore of Lough Neagh. This, with Mr. Kemp's record, points to the presence of the beetle in suitable places all round the lake. — W. F. Johnson, Acton Glebe, Poyntzpass : August 9th, 1902. 1903] 219 A Stylopid attracted by light.— It might interest readers of the Ent. Mo. Mag. to know that I recently captured a male Stylopid, at night, in an acetylene gas moth trap. It corresponds almost exactly to the figure of Elenehus tenuicomit (Westwood's Classification of Insects, vol. ii, p. 288, fig. 'J 1—1). — E. Kunk.st Gkern, Peradeniya, Ceylon : July 2Hth, 1902. Coleoptera, Sfc, at Woking. — The following species have been captured here this summer in addition to those already recorded, antea p. 134: — Anchomenus quadripunctatus, one specimen running on a pine stump, May 31st; Badister pelt at us, singly, in a damp place, not previously seen by me in this district ; Bern- Odium doris and B. obliquum ; Homalota scapularis and Tachinus scapularis, by sweeping; Medon obsoletus, on the wing ; Nitidula rufipes, in dead bird; Odon- tceux mobilicornis, one female example, captured on the wing in my garden by my son, June 21st ; Throscus carinifrons, running on a pine stump in the evening, in company with T. dermestoides ; Telephorus thoracicus ; Pissodes notatus, three specimens, in two widely separated localities, May and June, a species apparently spreading in the pine woods here; Ceuthorrhynchus setosus ; Sitones cambricus ; Alophus triguttatus ; Stylops melitttt, eighteen specimens captured on the wing in my garden, and others seen, May 24th, between 10 and 11 a.m., stylopised Andrena Wilkella occurring with them; Corimelcena scarabaoides ; Ceraleptus livid us ; Spathocera Dalmani, not previously seen by me in this district ; Corizus maculatus ; Ploiaria culiciformis, on the wing in my garden ; Ranatra linearis, in the canal. — G. C. Champion, Horsell, Woking: August lUh, 1902. Coleoptera from East Kent. — In my record of Coleoptera from East Kent for last year (antea pp. 7;<-7'l) I omitted the following : — Carabus nwnili.t, P., including the var. consitus, Panz., not uncommon in a little brick area sunk for the window of .i cellar ; Ocypus similis, F., 0. fuscatus, Grav., Euconnus denticornis, Mull., Eutheia plicata, Gyll., Liodes humeralis, ¥., and Caeliodes exiguus, 01. Also from the Blean Woods : Plinthus caliginoxus, ¥., Syntotnium mneum. Mull., Clambus minutus, Sturm, C. armadillo, De G., and Acalles ptinoides (3), the last mentioned from the purlieus of a nest of Formica rufa. This year I have been unable so far to find a single Coleopterous insect of any interest. I regret to say that my Ho»ioeusa locality has been destroyed. It was really an enormous heap of stones with which a small disused chalk pit had been filled, perhaps some hundreds of years ago. Unfortunately the owner discovered what it was about the same time as I did, the tons upon tons of stones were removed last winter to mend the roads, and ants' nests and beetles are no more. — A. J. Chitty, 27, Hereford Square, S.W. : June 20th, 1902. Otiorrhynchtts blandus, Oyll., in the Isle of Man. — During a visit to the Tsle of Man at the end of August, 1901, I met with a single specimen of this species on the Permian sandstone cliffs on the coast to the north of Peel. During the present year, in April, May, June, and July, I have taken a total of fifteen specimens in the neighbourhood of Port Erin : the majority occurred under stones, at roots of grass, or crawling on pathways on low clay-slate cliffs at 220 [September, Port Erin, Spaldrick Bay, Fleshwick, and Perwick ; a few, however, were found under stones at Bradda Head, and at Ballanahow, at an altitude of between 300 and 400 feet. Whilst on holiday visits to the island in August, 1890 and 1901, I collected up to the summits of several of the higher mountains, but never met with the species, and it may possibly be rather maritime than sub-alpine, so far as the Isle of Man is concerned.— J. Harold Bailey, Port Erin, Isle of Man : August Wth, 1902. Prionopyphon serricornis in Epping Forest.— On June 27th I had the good fortune to take a specimen of this rare beetle in Epping Forest between High Beech and Loughton, by sweeping in a damp place. I am informed by Mr. E. A. Newbery that Mr. Lewcock took a specimen in the same locality many years ago. — E. A. Butler, 53, Tollington Park, N. : August, 1902. Clonus luctuoxus, Bohem., at Tenerife. — Among a number of beetles lately received from Tenerife were four specimens of this rather handsome little insect ; it is not recorded by Wollaston, and there does not appear to be a specimen in the British Museum. Boheman's type was from Tenerife, and contained in Chevrolet's collection. Can any one give me any information as to recent captures ? — E. A. Elliott, 41, Holland Park, W. : June 4th, 1902. Lycrena Avion, Sfc., in Cornwall. — I am glad to be able to report that notwith- standing the burning of heath and gorse, and the enclosure and cultivation of many acres of wild land, where it was formerly common, this species appears to be as plentiful in some localities as it was in 1893 and 1896. It was satisfactorj to find it in two or three new localities, in one of which I had "turned out" many females in 1896. The range of the species is so extensive, and some of its haunts are so in- accessible, both for the farmer and the collector, that there does not appear to be any possibility of its extermination, although in some of its localities it must become rarer from the burning and cultivation of waste ground and from over collecting. Amongst other species occurring in the same district may be mentioned — Leucophasia sinapis, Arge Galathea, Satyrus Semele, Argynnis Aglaia and A. Selene, Sesia philanthiformis, Leucania littoralis, and Agrotis ripre. — H. Goss, Housel Bay Hotel, The Lizard, Cornwall : July, 1902. Note on Leucania fan color ; Barrt. — This species, which I have not seen for several seasons, has, I am glad to say, put in an appearance again this year. Three were taken on July 4th, two at sugar and one flying to my lantern ; these are remark- ably fine typical examples, and could nover be mistaken for anything else. Two more were taken on July 22nd on flowers of marram grass ; they also are good specimens, although not quite so fine as those taken on the 4th. All these are males. I visited the locality several times between the dates mentioned, as I was anxious to obtain a female that I might try for eggs, but only saw one more, and tins was too quick for me and flew off the sugar when I tried to box it. It is easily recognised, as it sits with its wings slightly raised, whereas pallens closes them tight and is 1902.] 221 much more quiet. Favicolor is evidently a shy insect, and I nearly lost one of those captured on the 4th, as it fluttered off the sugared post into some long grass where I had some difficulty in finding it. — Gervase F. Mathew, Dovercourt : August l£th, 1902. Lepidoptera in the New Forest in June, 1902. — Included among many others were. Tanessa polychloros, larvae on sallow ; ISphinx ligustri, Choerocaiupa elpenor, Macroglossa fuciformis, and M. bomby/iformis, Sesia forrnicceformin, Lnnacodes test udo, Nola eucullatella, N. strigula, larvae not uncommon, Lithosia mesomella, L. aureola, L. quadra, L. riibricollis, Euthemonia russula, Halias prasinana, Che- Ionia villica, Liparis monacha, Peecilocampa populi, E/lopia fasciaria, Amphydasis prodromaria, Cleora glabraria, C. lichenaria, Boarmia roboraria , just getting out as we came away, B. consortaria, a few worn, and evidently almost over, Tephrosia extersaria, not uncommon ; Ephyra punctaria, E. omicronaria, and others of the genus ; Acidalia trigeminata, one of the commonest Geometers, the specimens large and in fine condition, and came more freely to sugar than any Noctua did ! Corycia temerata and C. taminata, both common ; Macaria alternata, a few at Matley Bog among alder ; Scodiona belgiaria, the form much paler than the West Yorkshire moth ; Aspilates strigillaria, plentiful ; Eupithecia reciangulata, and others of the genus ; Collix sparsata, we were a little surprised to find this a New Forest moth ; Diloba cceruleocephala, Thyatira batis, Ci/matophora ridens,\&r\ve, common ; Diphthera Orion, a few at sugar; Dipterygia pinastri, Rusina tenebrosa, Era*tria fuscula, common ; Trachea piniperda, larvae, common ; Taniocampa miniosa, lai'vae, common ; Aplecta herbida and ^4. nebulosa, Hydrelia unca, Matley Bog ; Catocala promissa and C. sponsa, larvae; Botys pandalis, Cryptob/abes bistriga, Crambus sylvellus, common, &c. The fine stag beetle (Lucanus cervus) was very much in evidence all around Broekenhurst — one evening I picked up eleven in a few minutes ; and Hymenoptera were well represented in the fine hornets which came freely to the sugared trees during the daytime, and up to almost dark. — G-eo. T. Porritt, Crosland Hall, Huddersfield : August \Mh, 1902. The British Museum Collection of British Lepidoptera. — The donations up to date have been as follows : — some living larva? from Mr. Smallpiece of Ringwood, Hants ; a pair of Lycana minima, var. alsoides, from Mr. Piffard : these were taken on the coast near Lymington, Hants ; a living pupa in cocoon, and three cocoons, from which the moths had emerged, of Plusia moneta, from Mr. Small- man. In addition to the above, Mr. Ed. H. Thornhill, Boxworth, Cambridge, has promised some larvae, and the Bev. Joseph Greene will send a large collection of preserved pupae. — G. F. Hampson, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, S.W. : August lbth, 1902. The white variety of Dianthcecia carpophaga. — At the end of last May I obtained three specimens of the chalky-white variety of this insect, one being without the hind-marginal markings. They were taken on the sandhills on the Kentish Coast, and were all at rest on blades of marram grass, having presumably recently emerged. — Percy C. Reid, Feering Bury, Kelvedon : July, 1902. 222 [September, The habits of Nyssia lapponaria. — My friend Dr. McCallum, J. P., of Kinloch Rannoeh, has this year had the probably unique experience of capturing this insect in its wild imaginal state. It is excessively local, being found, for instance, on a spot of about an acre in extent, and limited entirely to that area, although the surrounding moorland may be of exactly the same type and character. It appa- rently flies but little (by day at all events), as only one specimen was seen on the wing. Its usual habit is to sit on the heather, where it will remain in cop. for hours together. Generally it is found on the bell heather (Erica), though some- times on the common ling, and occasionally on a birch tree. The female lays her eggs by inserting her ovipositor into the dead flower tubes of the bell heather, which she fills with eggs, or into the crevices of the bark of the birch tree. The eggs hatch towards the end of May, and the larvae are full fed about the end of July.— Id. Luperina testacea, Hb., at treacle. — Of the habits of Luperiua testacea, Mr. C. G-. Barrett, in Brit. Lep., iv, 337, writes as follows : — " At dusk it flies swiftly about fields, lanes, and grassy places generally, but is never found at sugar, nor known to feed at flowers or any kind of sweets." Since it is " the exception " that " proves the rule," it may be of interest to put on record two or three exceptions to the latter part of Mr. Barrett's statement that have recently come under my personal observation. During the last two years, while "sugaring" on the South Devon coast in August and September, I have not unfrequently found specimens of L. testacea sitting rather near the treacle patches, but taking no notice of them. In these cases, no doubt, the moths happen by chance to have crawled up on to what seemed to them to be convenient resting places. The same excuse, however, cannot be made for all the individuals noticed under more suspicious circumstances, for on September 2nd, 1900, 1 saw and watched, with much interest, a male and a female, and on September 6th, 1901, another female, which were all three engaged in eagerly sucking up the treacle through their outstretched tongues. How far they had been attracted to the spot by the sweets it is impossible to say, but the above instances clearly prove, at any rate, that if the sweets happen to come in their way they are, if so inclined, fully capable of enjoying them. The powerful attraction that artificial light has for L. testacea, more especially for the males, is probably well known : the females are in general very lethargic, merely crawling out of their hiding places at night, and sitting quietly about on grass stems, posts, &c, though under favourable conditions of weather I have before now taken them at electric light in a first floor room. — Eustace R. Bankes, Norden, Corfe Castle : July IQth, 1902. Captures of Lepidoptera in Wilts. — Although the wet and cold spring greatly retarded the appearance of some species (in some instances by as much as from thirty to forty days), I do not find that there is any scarcity of Lepidoptera this season, when proper search is made for them. Amongst recent captures in this district were the following local species, some indicating an extension of the known geographical range. Senta maritima. — In a marsh on the Kennet near Chilton Foliat I took a fresh 1902.] 223 specimen by searching at the base of the reeds. From a pupa found lying on the mud at the same time I bred Leucania impudent. In this same marsh L.straminea is common, and this year Mr. R. M. Maxwell lias met with L. obsoleta there. Plusia moneta. — The spread of this insect into our district has been plainly traceable. In 1896 an example was taken in the neighbouring valley of Pewsey, but the species was not observed here until 1899 ; since then it has been taken each year, and this summer larva? were found and reared. Nepticula filipendulce. — In the marsh above-mentioned I captured a specimen which I refer to this species from amongst Spircea ulmaria, on which I imagine it fed. I also took there Nepticula apicella, but I believe Populus tremula is absent from the locality, though P. nigra occurs. Nepticula cryptella. — I swept this up from a bank near All Cannings, in the Devizes district. Raslerstammia Erxlebella. — I have long been on the look out for this species ; this year a specimen was taken near Bedwyn by H. W. Daltry, one of the College collectors. — E. Meyeick, Elmswood, Marlborough : July 20th, 1902. Ceropales variegatus, Fab., at Woking. — I was very pleased to meet yesterday with a beautiful female of this rare Aculeate (the first specimen of it I ever took in England), quite near to my own house. It occurred on the wild carrot, in a large field where I have made other good captures (Calicurgus hyalinatus, Prosopis cornuta and dilatata,&c), but which, I regret to say, is rapidly being swallowed up by villa-building. Just now it is an ideal collecting ground ; but I fear that, in that respect, its days are numbered. — F. D. Morice, Woking: August 6th, 1902. Hymenoptera near Hayward's Heath, Sussex. — During a visit at the end of July last to friends residing temporarily in the above neighbourhood, I made one or two brief excursions — rather at random, as I did not know the district at all — in search of Hymenoptera. None of these expeditions lasted much over an hour or so, and the weather was generally rather dull and cold ; yet I came across several species which seem worth recording, and I imagine that under more favourable conditions the locality would repay a longer and more serious exploration. The following were among my captures -. — Odynerus leevipes, Shuck., $ ; Pro- sopis cornuta, Smith, $ $ , dilatata, Kirb., th, 1902. [Ent. Month. Mag., 1902, PL IV. NEW BRITISH FLEAS. October, 1902.] 225 NEW BRITISH FLEAS (Plate IV). BY THE HON. N. CHARLES ROTHSCHILD, B.A., E.L.S. Ceratophyllus Garei, sp. nov., PI. iv, figs. 1—3. Closely allied to C. galtince, Schrank, from which species it can be easily dis- tinguished by the form of the eighth sternite in the J (fig. 2), and by that of the seventh sternite in the V (fig. 3). The prothoracic comb consists of twenty-sis teeth. Length, 2"5 mm. TeD specimens of this species were secured from, the nest of a waterhen (Gall inula chloropus) in July last near Tring. The late Mr. E. C. Rye* mentions a Ilea as occurring on the waterhen, but we have failed to find any description of it. The present species is named in honour of Mr. George Gare, of Wembdon, Bridgwater, who has done much to further the knowledge of the fleas parasitic on birds. Ceratophyllus Walkeri, sp. nov., PI. iv, figs. 4, 5, 7. Closely allied to G. lagomys, Wagner, a non- British species, under which name it was recorded on our identification in Verrall's list of British Diptera (last edition). Since the publication of that work, however, we have received typical examples of C. lagomys from Dr. Wagner, and are now able to decide that the present species is abundantly distinct. The type specimen of the present species was forwarded to us by Mr. J. J. Walker, who found it in a deserted mouse nest in March, 1898, at Chattenden in Kent. We have, how- ever, received subsequently other specimens from Mustela erminea and M. vulgaris (Tring), iSorex vulgaris (Bevandean, Sussex), Microtus glareolus (Tring and Ouudle), Microtus amphibius (Tring), and "Hedge clippings" (Chesham). C. Walkeri is a very dark species, measuring 3 mm. in length. The prothoracic comb consists of eighteen teeth. The ninth tergite of the $ is drawn in fig. 4. The eighth tergite of the $ is shown in fig. 5, and is readily distinguished from that of C. lagomys, Wagner, fig. 6 inserted for comparison. The seventh sternite of the ¥ (fig. 7) is deeply sinuate, somewhat resembling that of C. Newsteadi. EXPLANATION OF PLATE IV. Fig. 1 — Ceratophyllus Garei Transactions of the Devonshire Association Adv. of Science " for that year, but I find therein no allusion to the district worked by me, though the informa- tion for the Exe valley, further west, is tolerably full. I have thought it advisable to include fin square brackets) certain species taken from time to time at Seaton and neighbourhood by the Rev. A. E. Eaton, some of which have been already recorded in this Magazine. My list might, perhaps, have been somewhat longer, had not so much of my time been devoted to one particular species (cf. ante, pp. 212, 213). TRICHOPTERA. TiiMNOPHiLiUjK : — Limnophilus marrnoratus, Ct., the Axe at Whitford ; L. auricula, Ct., beaten out of conifers in the Royal Peer Park at Shute ; L. sparsus, Ct., near Colyton. Sericostomatid^e : — Sericostoma pprso»nhim, Spence, along the Axe towards Axminster, common ; and tributary to the Coly. Ooera pilosa, F., Whitford [Silo pallipex, ¥., near Axmouth]. [Crunatcia irrorata, Ct., Axmouth and Seaton]. Lepidostoma hirtam, ¥., Whitford. Hydp.optilidje : — Agraylea multipunctata, Ct., on the bridge at Whitford. [Hydroplila Maclachlani, Klap., Axmouth and the Landslip. E.forcipata, Etn., Shute. Oxyethirafaicata, Mort., Ottery and Kilmington]. One or two species were common near Whitford, but only females were brought home. Mr. Morton has kindly given me the benefit of his good eyes by examining the materials in this Family. LEPTOCERlDiE : — [Bertea pullata, Ct., Axmouth, abundant, and Bovey Common, Seaton] ; B. maurus, Ct., at a " dribble " on high land west of Shute [Seaton and Haven Cliff, Axmouth, abundant ; B. articularis, Pict., Haven Cliff near Axmouth, 1902.] 237 a few]. Odontocerum albicorne, Scop., tributaries to the Coly, not common. Mo- lanna angustata, Ct., Wliitford. Leptocerus cinereus, Ct., abundant on the Axe, also tributaries to the Coly, a form in which the only marking on the wings of the £ is the arcular spot ; L. albifrons, L., Whitford and elsewhere on the Axe and Yarty, common ; L. bilineatus. L., Whitford, one ; L. dissimilis, St., VVhitford,rare. Mystacides azurea, L., Whitford and elsewhere, common. Tri anodes conspersa, Rbr., on the Axe and mouth of the Yarty, common, cf. ante. pp. 212, 213. Adicella reducta, McLach., at small streamlets near Seaton Junction and Whitford [Ax- mouth]. Setodes interrupta, F., on the Axe near Whitford, one. Hl'DUorSYCHlD^; : — Hydropsyche instabilis, Ct., one, precise locality uncertain ; H. guttata, Pict., singly, on the Axe at Whitford, and the Coly ; H. lepida, Pict., very abundant at Whitford, also at streams tributary to the Axe and Coly. Di- plectrona felix, McLach., near Dalwood, one [Brauscombe and the Landslip]. [Pleclrocnemia brew's, McLach., sandstone cliffs at Seaton, occasionally at the base of the cliffs. Mr. Eaton caught two in my company, but I did not care to trust myself on the face of the cliffs, where the insect frequents damp places caused apparently by percolation of surface water, which is soaked up by the herbage ; a more unlikely spot for a species of this genus it is difficult to imagine]. Polycen- tropus flavomacnl atits, Pict., common at Whitford, also on tributaries to the Coly. Tinodes wceneri, L., common at Whitford ; [Z7. aureola, Zett., Branscombe and near Axmouth, singly ; T. unicolor, Pict., Haven Cliff near Axmouth, not common.] Lype phreopa, St., near Whitford, one. Psychomyiu pusilla, F., common, but not abundant, at Whitford. RhyacophiliDjE : — Rhyacophila dorsatis, Ct., on the Axe at Whitford, and Branscombe, singly. Agapetus fuscipes, Ct., generally common at small streamlets ; A. comalus, Pict., common on the tributaries to the Coly. PLANIPENNIA PanorpiDjE : — Panorpa germanica, L., singly, over the district. Hemekobiid^ : Hemerobius micans, Oliv., Shute churchyard ; II. luteseens, F., near Colyton, one ; II. humuli, a few scattered over the district ; H. stigma, St., conifers in the Royal Deer Park at Shute ; H. atrifrons, McLach., same locality, two examples ; [i/. concinnus, St., one in a spider's web at Seaton, the typical form ] GHKYSOPID.3E : — Of the genus Chrysopa I brought back forty individuals, the majority of those seen ; they were nearly all beaten from Fraxinus, and scattered over the district. I find six species which sum up numerically as follows : — Ch. ventralis, Ct., 3 ; Jiavifrons, Brauer, 24 ; tenella, Schnd., 7 ; alba, L., 1 ; jlava, Scop., 2 ; vulgaris, Schnd., 3. CONIOPTERYGID.& : — Coniopteryx aleyrodiformis, St., and psociformis, Ct., Seaton. PSEUDO-NEUROPTERA. The few Ephemeuid.e and Peelid^: seen are not here enumerated. PsociDiE : — These were not specially attended to, and the date was somewhat too early ; Stenopsocus (Oraphopsociis) cruciatus, L., Seaton. Elipsocus (Meso- psocusj unipunctatus, Mull., Seaton ; E. ll'estiooudii, McLach., Seaton, and from 238 [October, conifers in the Royal Deer Park at Shute, tolerably common. [Ectopsocus Briggsi, McLach., Seaton, in the house]. Clothilla pulsatoria, L., Seaton Junction, in the hotel. Odonata : — Sympetrum striolatum, Clip., Whitford, at overflow pools. JEsclma cyanea, Mull., seen once or twice in lanes. Calopteryx Virgo, L., abundant on the Axe, also on tributaries to the Coly. Platyctiemis pennipes, Pall., not rare on the Axe. Ischnura elegans, V. d. L., a few at Whitford at overflow pools. Agrion puella, L., a few at a weedy meadow pond near Shute. The scarcity of sunshine was fatal to the appearance of dragon-flies on the wing ; the marshes towards the mouth of the Axe, where not under tidal influence, should furnish several species. Lewisham, London : August 31st, 1902. SILPHA ATRATA, L., VAR. SUBROTUNDATA, Steph., IN THE ISLE OP MAN. BY J. HAROLD BAILEY, M.B. During the present year I have made special search for this form in the neighbourhood of Port Erin, stimulated thereto by reading in Mr. W. E. Sharp's paper on " Some Speculations on the Derivation of our British Coleoptera " (Trans. Liverpool Biol. Soc, vol. xiii, 1899, p. 1 70) that "even that peculiarly Irish form, Silpha subrotundata, occurs in the Isle of Man." I have so far been successful in finding between forty and fifty specimens. The first example was taken under a stone on March 31st, and others were captured in April, May, June, and July ; April producing the greatest number. All except five occurred under stones, usually singly or in pairs, never more than four specimens being taken under one stone. They were found scattered over an area of ground three miles from one point to the other. Stones by the sides of lanes on the level ground (30 to 50 feet above sea level) were the most productive ; a few occurred on hilly ground, 300 to 400 feet high, at Bradda, Surby, and the Mull Hills ; on the sea shore only three examples were taken. Those which were found otherwise than under stones occurred as follows : — one crawling up a stone wall, two crawling on the footpath in the day- time, one similarly at dusk, and one after dark whilst searching with a lantern. On examining the series, the most interesting fact is that not only do they correspond to the Irish form, subrotundata, Steph., but they are all of the brown form of this variety. Messrs. Johnson and Halbert, in their " List of the Beetles of Ireland," p. G92, suggest that the type form Silpha atrata, L., is in Ireland represented solely by the var. subrotundata, which is found loos.] 239 there both in the black and brown forms. The same may possibly hold good for the Isle of Man, with the further limitation that only the brown form of subrotundata occurs. I have not met with an example of the type form atrata nor its var. brunnea in this particular district, nor in some other parts of the Island in which I have col- lected slightly at various times. Comparing the Manx specimens with a long series of the type atrata and its var. brunnea, which I captured in company under loose bark of a tree trunk by the Shropshire bank of the river Ceiriog, the following points are worthy of notice. First, as regards size — measuring in each case from apex of thorax to apex of elytra, ignoring the head — the type atrata averages from II to 12 mm. in length, a few smaller examples only 10 mm. The specimens of the var. brunnea mostly measure 10 mm., a few 0 mm., and a few larger specimens 12 mm. The length of my Manx subrotundata is as a rule 13 mm., some larger ones 14 mm., while three or four examples only measure 10 mm. As regards shape they are almost invariably much broader in proportion than the type atrata, the elytra being more dilated in the middle of the margins, the distance between the outer raised line and the elytral margin being distinctly wider than in the type. As Messrs. Johnson and Halbert remark " the reflexed margin of the elytra is strongly developed, and extends almost to the apex." The thorax is less closely punctured in the middle of the disc ; though in a few specimens this difference is not so well marked as in the rest ; the base of the thorax appears broader, and its posterior angles project further beyond the line of the elytral margins than in the type. My specimens confirm the same writers' statement that the sup- posed difference in the length of the central raised line on the elytra is not to be relied on as a distinction. Only in about 10 per cent, of the specimens is the middle line the longest. As to the supposed occur- rence of subrotundata in England, Messrs. Johnson and Halbert say that there do not seem to be any satisfactory records. It may possibly be that the few records really refer to occasional larger and broader specimens of the type approaching the var. subrotundata, just as there are occasional smaller and less broad specimens amongst the subro- tundata- a partial reversion to the type form possibly. Certainly if the true subrotundata occurred in England we should expect it to be taken in some numbers, judging from its abundance in the localities where it is found in Ireland and the Isle of Man. The dillicult questions as to the derivation of subrotundata in Ireland and the Isle of Man, and the absence there of the type form, remain for future investigation and speculation. Port Erin, Isle of Man : September 8th, 1902. 240 (October, On Otiorrhynchus tenebricosus and O. fuscipes. — In view of the uncertainty which must attend any attempt to discriminate with accuracy between these two species by means of the characters laid down for them in our English text books, and the consequent liability to error in records of their distribution, it may be well to draw attention to the fact that the males at least are readily distinguishable by the following characters : — Legs piceous or black ; last ventral segment with a transverse series of longitu- dinal striae placed twice as closely at the sides as in the middle... tenebricosus, Herbst. Legs red, knees and tarsi black ; last ventral segment with the longitudinal striae practically equidistant throughout the series fuscipes, Walt. The differences in the relative proportions of the joints of the funiculus appear to me too difficult of appreciation to be of much use for taxonomic purposes. My acquaintance with O. tenebricosus, though sufficient for the present purpose, is limited ; 1 only have it from the neighbourhood of Dover, where I took it com- monly in April, 1876 ; 0. fuscipes is common here ; neither species so far as I know occurs in Norfolk. Whether the name fuscipes, Walt., is correctly applied to the insect mentioned above is not altogether clear. Many years ago there was much discussion of this matter between E. C. Rye and F. Smith ; the former seeking to show that the O. fuscipes of Walton was nothing but O. tenebricosus, the latter maintaining that (J. fuscipes, Walt., was a distinct species, and the same as O. fuscipes, 01. I am not, aware that the question has ever been satisfactorily settled, but it is clear that we have two well-ascertained species, whatever may be their correct names (cf. Rye, Ent. Mo. Mag., ii, pp. 181, 233; Ent. Ann., 1867, p. 120; Smith, Ent. Mo. Mag., ii, p. 232).— J. Edwards, Colesborne, Cheltenham : Sep- tember llth, 1902. Bagous lutosus, Gyll., a British insect. — In looking through a useful resume by Mr. Newbery, of what is known about the British species of this genus (Ent. Rec, xiv, pp. 149 — 156, June, 1902), 1 found the above species excluded, apparently on the ground that neither the author nor Mr. Champion had seen a British speci- men possessing the characters proper to lutosus, Gyll. As I had included the latter in my lists of Norfolk Coleoptera (Trans. Norfolk and Norwich Nat. Soc, v, p. 488; Victoria History of Norfolk, i, p. 134), 1 thought it well to re-examine my material in order to make quite sure that I had not misinterpreted the descriptions given in Cox's Handbook and Fowler's Col. Brit. Islands. 1 find that my single example taken on Wrelham Heath, Norfolk, August 4th, 1890, exhibits the dis- tinctive characters given for B. lutosus, Gyll., in the works named, and also by Mr. Champion (Ent. Mo. Mag., xxxiv, pp. 52 — 54). The sudden narrowing and subsequent production of the apical portion of the elytra is very evident and characteristic. Moreover, by the kindness of Mr. Champion, 1 have been enabled to compare my specimen with his Swedish example of B. lutosus, ex coll. Thomson (believed to have come from Gyllenhal himself), and a specimen sent by Mr. Walker from Besika Bay ; except that the sutural stria is not so conspicuously deeper than the remainder, it agrees ad punctum with the former and very well with the latter. Mr. Champion also sent me his specimen of what is known as the large form of B. glabrirostris ; this insect is at least one half larger than normal 1902.] 241 B. glabrirostris, and, contrary to what I have observed in the many examples of the latter which have come under my notice, the pale spot beyond the middle of the third interstice is not continued across the third interstice. It appears doubtful whether the British species of this genus are, even now, thoroughly known ; I took at Ranworth on July 24th, 1890, a specimen with excavated presternum, third tarsal joint nearly twice as wide as the second, and the antennse inserted at. the middle of the rostrum, which otherwise resembles B. alismatis, Marsh., so closely that it stood in my series of the latter for a long time ; but for the widened third joint of the tarsi this specimen might, having regard to the variability in facies exhibited by the species of this genus, pass muster as B. tempestivus, Herbst. — Id. : July 3CWA, 1902. Some water beetles of the Esher district. — As during the present year I have had several opportunities of working the ponds of the Esher district, and have turned up several unexpected species, a short account of my captures may be of interest. Among the Ualiplidce nothing of importance was found, but Pelobius tardus occurred plentifully in one or two places. Several Bidessus geminus were taken out of a muddy pool, with a few Ceelambus iinpresso-punctalus, and one C. conftuens and several C. versicolor were captured in a neighbouring pond. Ceelambus incequalis was common. The best species of Rydroporus taken were H. obscurus, umbrosus and tristis, the last two being, I believe, common in Scotland. Agabus Sturmi and nebu/osus occurred freely. Ilybius fuliginosus and ater were plentiful, and a few /. fenestrates were taken ; but the best species of this genus was I. amescens, which was in some abundance in two ponds. Cope/atus agilis and llhantus exoletus were common, and two Rhantus bistriatus were secured. Colymbeles fuscus and Aci/ius sulcatus were abundant, and in one small pond I was delighted to find a number of Hydaticus seminiger ; sixteen specimens were captured with one net in about an hour. This pond bears a close resemblance to those in which Mr. W. E. Sharpe takes the insect, being thick and muddy without weed, and, as in Mr. Sharp's locality, Copelatus agilis and Ceelambus impresso-punctatus occur with it. The species was immature on September 6th. Dytiscus punctulatus and marginalis occurred in the same pond, but D. circumjlexus was not found at all, although comparatively plen- tiful in other localities near London. The common Oyrinus natator was abundant, and in March a long series of G. minulus was taken ; they were swimming on shallow water among sphagnum. The latter was not to be found this September, although carefully searched for ; it has not, I believe, been previously recorded from the south of England.— Stanley W. Kemp, SU, Oxford Gardens, Notting Hill, W. : September l&th, 1902. Leemostenus complanatus, Dej., a British insect.— Mr. Champion's surmise in the note on this insect in the last issue of this Magazine (p. 210) that it would probably be found mixed with P. terricola in British collections proves correct in my case. I at once carefully re-examined the supposed exponents of I', terricola in my cabinet, and found of the eight that three were undoubtedly L. complanatus ; these three were all taken together under bricks in a granary yard at Strood in June, 1899. The differences between the two insects are quite striking, when 242 [October, attention is drawn to them, and I am surprised I did not notice the fact when putting away these three with the others. — T. Hudson Beare, 10, Regent Terrace, Edinburgh : September 5th, 1902. Coleuptera in a Berwickshire Moss. — Thanks to the kindness of my friend Mr. J. E. Black, of Peebles, who conducted me to the spot, I had a day's collecting at Gordon Moss on Saturday, July 5th. This Moss is evidently the remains of a much more extensive one, but it has gradually been reclaimed and brought under culti- vation, and now only a comparatively small remnant remains in its original condition — an attempt to exploit it by a Moss Litter Company having ended in financial failure. The Moss contains numerous deop holes, descending far into the peat, and the ground between is mostly covered with dwarf birch and sallows ; one has therefore to exercise great care in working over it to avoid a sudden and abrupt ending to the day's collecting. Though the results of the day's working was not as satisfactory as the peculiar conditions of the spot promised, still I found some interesting insects. By beating the shrubs the following were obtained : — Elater halteatus, L., Sericosomus brunneus, L., Cwliodes rubicundus, Pk., Deporaus betu/ce, L., Rhynehites uncinatus, Th., Authonomus romari, Crotch, Halyzia lS-ffidtafa, L., Crepidodera smaragdina, Fond. General sweeping produced Limonius minutus, L., Corymbites tessellatus, L., Luperus fiavipes, L., Hydrothassa marginella, L., Adimonia suturalis, Th., Microcara livida, P., Cyphvn nitidulns, Th., C. coarctatus, lJk., Ceuthorrhyn- chus ericw, Gryll., Ceuthorrhynchidius versicolor, Bris., Gymnetron beccabungce, L., Phytobius i-luberculalus, P., Anthobiuni minutum, P., Hydroporus memnonius, Nic., and Rhinosimus viridipennis, Steph. ; curiously enough though I have never taken this latter insect in its usual habitat this is the second time I have swept it up recently in Scotland. Under the bark of a fallen Scots fir near the edge of the Mobs, Rhizophagus dispar, Pk., Bolitochara ob/iqua, Er., and 1'hUeopora reptans, Gr., were obtained, and a single specimen of Necrophorus mortuorum, P., was knocked down as it flew across the bog. Mr. Black, during a visit a few days before, beat Magdalinus carbonarius, L., off a birch tree, and lie has also taken Acilius canaliculatus, Nic, commonly out of one of the peat-holes, accompanied by Dytiscus marginalis, L.,and D. puncfu/atus, P. ; on the occasion of our visit water-nets had not been taken with us, but we could see L). marginalis swimming about in one of the pools. — Id. Metcecus paradoxus in a nest of J'espa vulgaris 30 feel from the ground. — The small " anchor-faced " wasp, Vespa vulgaris, is very abundant this season. I had a large nest brought me this week from the roof of a house 30 feet high, and sus- pended under the tiles, a very unusual site. I was surprised to find Metwcus in it. This tends to support the theory advanced by Ur. Chapman that the larva of the parasite is taken into the nest by the wasps with the rotten wood for building. — W. II. Tuck, Tostock : September hth, 1902. Antenna/ movements in a decapitated Slug Beetle. — Some time ago the decapi- tated head of a large male stag beetle (Lucanus cervus) was found by one of my 1902.] 243 sons on the top of a gate post at Wimbledon about 8 a.m. As it was a particularly fine specimen he brought it up to me at Lloyd's. At the time I received it (about 11 a.m ) both of its antenna? wei'e waving about freely ; sufficiently so to be of interest to many of my friends in the " room." Each antenna seemed to work quite irrespectively of the other, and one would often be still while the other moved. Their movements were not in any way rhythmical, the long basal joint of the an- tenna would be extended and retracted, and quite as a separate movement the rest of the joints would move to and fro from their fulcrum at the apex of the first joint. The lamellar joints of the club would also move separately ; the apical joints of the antennae- were very sensitive, and the antennas would retreat rapidly on their being touched ; this condition went on without interruption till 3.40 p.m., when I had to leave to catch a train. I put the head into a little flat cardboard pen bos, packing it in with blotting paper in such a way as I thought would allow the an- tenna? free play ; on opening the box, however, after I had got into the train I found that one of the antenna? had got against the side of the box, and from that moment it never moved again. The other, however, went on as before till about 4.30 p.m., when it began to droop, and would only recommence movement on its own account on being touched ; at 5 p.m. all movement had practically ceased, and the organ on being lifted fell back to its original position. An interesting point in this matter was that from the time I received it all the other appendages of the head were motionless, in fact, they were already rigorous, and sprang back at once to position on being extended. The sensitiveness to touch of the apex of the antenna? existed to the last observable free movements. There can be little doubt T think that reflex muscular action alone would not account for the movement noticed, the nerve centres could not have been dead, and the absence of movement in the other organs would suggest that the antenna) have separate nerve centres from those which feed the other cephalic appendages. — Edward Saunders, St. Ann's, Woking : June 23rd, 1902. Lepidoptera in the Montreux district.— From May 26th to June 6th, 1902, I was at Montreux, on the Lake of Geneva, and devoted part of my time to collecting Rhopalocera. The district worked was that between the village of Blonny on the north, and Aigle (about six miles up the Rhone Valley from the Lake) on the south. Such species as Leucophasia sinapis, Euchloe card amines, Vanessa Io, Cceno- nympha Pamphilus, Thecla ruhi, Lyccena Alms (minima), Syrichthus malva, and Nisoniades Tages were met with almost everywhere ; while Nemeobius Lucina and Hesperia sylvanus were common locally. I saw about half a dozen Papilio Podalirius, but only one of those captured was at all perfect. Aporia cratagi, $ s, were out in some force by June 5th. Colias Hyale was to be seen fairly frequently, but I did not come across any Colias F.dusa, except one var. Helice, taken at Blonay on May 31st, which is in first rate condition. Of the Fritillaries I took Argynnis Selene (one, worn), A. Dia (two, worn), A. Euphrosyne, Melitcea auriuia, M. Athaliu, and M. Cinxia. The last four species all in perfect condition. The Vanessidce were a good deal in evidence, V. Io and V. cardui heading the 244 [October, list in point of numbers. Of Y. Antiopa I took two, but they are far from perfect. I noticed a good many more, but did not succeed in getting them. J', e-album was frequently seen, but V. urtiece was almost absent. I noticed this last named species, together with Euchloe eardamines, Lycama alsus, and Nisoniades Tages, flying at an elevation of about 4000 feet on the base of the Rochers de Naye. There was a good deal of snow even as low as this in May. Erebia Medusa and Epinephele hyperanthus were on the wing in the vicinity of Aigle, and in the same locality I took Pararge Algeria, P. Megtera, Polyommatus dor His (one), and several Carlerocephalus paniscus. At Les Avants I netted two Pararge Hiera, and obtained one more later at Blonay. As to the Lycmnidre. I think I am not far wrong in saying that L. Alsus was quite the commonest butterfly seen. It swarmed round the puddles and streamlets on the roads and paths, rising in a cloud as one passed by. L. Icarus (Alexis) and L. Ac-is (semiargus) were plentiful, and good single examples of L. argiohis and L. cyllarus were taken. Turning to the Heterocera, several species were very common in the meadows at Veytaux, and near Aigle, such as Enclidia glyphica, Emafuraa atomaria, and Scoria dealbata (lineata). I also took in the same localities two Erastrla decep- toria, several Strenia clathrata, and single examples of the following, Venilia maculata, Minoa murinata, Emmelesia albulata, Tephrosia co?tsonaria,B.nA Cr ambus ■pratellus. Near Aigle I found two Zygana trifolii, and on May 20th obtained Plusia chrysitis, Eubolia plumbaria, Larentia viridaria, Eupisleria obliterata, and Hypsi- petes impltiviata, by beating bushes bordering a very marshy meadow at Villeneuve. I did not work at all for motbs after dark, as there was not to my knowledge any favourable ground within reasonable distance of the hotel. As regards the weather, I was fortunate in having it fine and hot, with the exception of one day (June 3rd), when a severe storm accompanied by heavy rain visited the district. The effect, as the storm passed over the lake, was very fine. — Philip J. Baeraud, Bushey Heath, Herts : August, 1902. A small form of Lyceena Corydon in Oxfordshire. — On August 13th, a dull, sultry day, I visited a chalk pit near Watlington, Oxon., and was astonished to find L. Corydon in the utmost profusion lying about in the grass. Their numbers were in excess of my previous experience of any Lepidopterous insect whatever ; they seemed unable or unwilling to fly, and when disturbed, merely fluttered feebly in the grass, so that it was impossible to avoid treading on them, and we must un- willingly have destroyed hundreds. What was even more astonishing was the difference in their sizes. A considerable number were about the average bulk, but the majority, both males and females, were extraordinarily undersized, measuring from just under an inch to an inch and a quarter across the wings. Hardly any other butterfly was seen, and the only moths in any force were Z. filipendula and E. bipunctaria, the former, like the butterflies, refusing to fly, and clinging to the grass and flowers of the Scabious. The next day being bright and fresh the insects 1902.] 245 were lively enough, and spread themselves freely over the neighbouring fields, though their numbers in the original locality were still amazingly great.— C. T. Cruttwell, Ewelme, Wallingford : August, 1902. An alhinic variety of Cwnonympha Pamphilus, L. — A young friend, Mr. H. A. Parsons, has just brought in for my inspection a variety of Coenonympha Pamphilus , L., which he had the good fortune to take in July last, near Studland, Dorset. In it the whole upper surface of the fore- and hind-wings has its usual fulvous colour replaced by creamy-white ; the usual discal dot and narrow marginal stripe re- maining brown, though but faintly so ; the under-side of the fore-wings partakes of the creamy-white tint. So complete a case of albinism is exceedingly rare in this species. — Chas. GL Barrett, Tremont, Peckham Rye : September 3rd, 1902. On the fight-time of Argyresthia Atmorielln, Bnks. — In a note published in the Ent. Mo. Mag., Ser. 2, xii, 200 (1901), I mentioned that the only specimen of Argyresthia Atmoriella that I had seen on the wing of its own accord was flying briskly at 7.40 p.m. (i. e., about 40 minutes before sunset) on June 21st of last year. I have not worked specially for the insect this season, and have only met with two or three examples of it, but one of these, a rather worn female, was netted while flying backwards and forwards close to a branch of larch at 8.5 p.m. (i. e., about a quarter of an hour after sunset), on July 28th. Tlie moth was obviously indulging in a voluntary flight, which was of such an oscillating character that I have little doubt that the insect was intent on finding a suitable place for ovipositing on the branch to which its attention was directed. In view of the particularly sluggish nature of the species, these two instances seem sufficient to prove that its natural flight-time is from rather before to rather after sunset. July 28th is an exceptionally late date for the insect to be still about : last year (after a cold late spring) I took it from June 7th— 21st, but this season seems as prolific in record late appearances as 1893 waB in record early ones. — Eustace R. Bankes, Norden, Corfe Castle : August 8tk, 1902. Psammotis pulvera/is, Hb., in the Isle of Purbeck. — In Ent. Mo. Mag., ser. 2, x, 289, I chronicled the capture in 1899, by a young friend, of a worn specimen of Psammotis puhwralis in this district, and it is highly satisfactory to be able to record the fact that a few other examples have, in the course of this and last seasons, been taken in the same spot (which is one of very restricted area), and that the species, which is of such rare occurrence in Britain at the present time, is evidently established there. Last year, at the end of July and beginning of August, a friend and I, favoured by particularly fine and hot weather, secured between us eight specimens (viz., seven males and one female), but this season, in spite of several visits to the locality, the only specimen that has been seen is a male that I captured on July 28th, and there seems now but little likelihood of others being met with. The imago is easily disturbed from among the herbage, &c, at any time during the day, and its flight is slow and weak : in size and habits it closely resembles Ebulea crocealis, Hb., which occurs in the same spot, and at the same time, but 246 [October, even if the much more brightly coloured wings of the latter are invisible, a glimpse of its conspicuously white legs is at once sufficient to distinguish it from P. pulveralis. I was in great hopes of finding the larva this year, but repeated searches for it in the spring and early summer were not rewarded with success. It appears to be still unknown and undescribed except in its earlier stages, upon which some notes, made from larva1 hatched in confinement, have been published in Buckler's " Larvae of British Butterflies and Moths," ix, 149-151. The larva is reputed to feed in nature on Mentha aquatica, and Mr. Buckler's young larvae throve for a short while upon this plant, which he calls (I. c.) by the name " Mentha hirsuta," while Mr. Porritt reports (I.e.) that the newly hatched larvae under his care took kindly to "common garden mint." — Id.: August loth. Occurrence of Noctua plecta, L., in April. — It may be of interest to record the fact that on the night of April 16th, 1881, I captured at sallow bloom in this neighbourhood a specimen of Noctua plecta ; it was a female in beautiful condition, and had evidently only emerged quite recently. Unless my memory plays me false, I have seen within the last few years, in one of t lie entomological magazines, a notice of the capture, also at sallow bloom, of a specimen of N. plecta as early as April, but am unable to find it: such an occurrence must be very exceptional. In Entom., ix, 273, Mr. Cavringtori recorded the capture of N. plecta and other summer Noctua- at sal/otv bloom near Rannoch, but the appearance of the moths was hardly premature, since the date was June 17th ! — Id. Albinic aberration of Catoptria ulicetana, Hw. — In Ent. Mo. Mag., ser. 2, viii, 63 (1897), I recorded the capture by myself, on May 10th, 1892, of a remarkable albinic aberration of Catoptria ulicetana on the Isle of Purbeck coast. Since that nole was written I have come across, among some Micros waiting to be added to my collection, a second example of this same aberration of C. ulicetana that I took on the Isle of Purbeck coast, though not in the same spot as the first one, on May 12th, 1893. Its capture had escaped my memory when penning the note referred to above, though it had been duly entered in my diary at the time. This specimen, which is also a male, agrees very well with the description given (/. c) of the other, except that, near the apex of the fore-wing, three or four cream-coloured costal singula* can be traced. I refrain from suggesting a name for this striking aberra- tion, not knowing as yet what degree of albinism is exhibited by var. conjunclana, Moschl., which is briefly described in Staudinger and Rebel's " Catalog" (19(H) as " multo dilutior, albescens." — Id. Tamiocampa gracilis, var. rufescens, Ckll., in East Dorset. — This striking variety (popularly known as the "New Forest red form") of Taniocampa gracilis has been recorded from Hampshire, Kent and Perthshire (vide Brit. Noel, and their Vars., p. 146), but I was quite unaware of its occurrence in Dorset until last April. It gave me especial pleasure, therefore, to see, on April 18th, in the collection of Mr. W. G. Hooker, of Bournemouth, a fine example of this variety, which had been taken by himself a few years ago near Ham Preston, which lies in the portion of East Dorset between Wimborne and the western boundary of Hampshire. — Id. 1902.] 247 Senta maritima (ulvce), Acidalia emutaria, and Agdintis Bennelti in East Suffolk. — All three of these insects being somewhat local, a notice of their occur- rence here this year might be of interest. The first specimen of Senta maritima was secured on July loth, flying at early dusk along some reeds in a marsh ditch, close to the banks of the river Deben. Further search on the two following evenings afforded four more, and another was taken on July 25th ; I saw others but. failed to get near them, owing to the swampy nature of the ground. Most of the examples obtained were more or less worn, and worthless as cabinet specimens, and had to be released ; evidently a fortnight earlier would have been a better time. The same may be said of Acidalia emutaria, which I captured on the same dales. I was too late to obtain the species in good condition, and of the several specimens netted 1 only kept three. Agdi.ttis Bennetti flew into my room on July 18th attracted by the light, four specimens the same evening, two of these promptly destroyed them- selves in the lamp, and the other two 1 boxed. There is an abundance of its food plant (Statice limonium) on the saltings not far from my house. Senta maritima seems to have a preference for fresh water rather than salt, at any rate, I discovered its real home here is amongst some reeds standing in water, and bordering a fresh water stream, with an alder earr hard by. Acidalia emutaria. on the other hand, kept to the river side, and was confined to one small spot on the river wall where there is plenty of marram grass. It was easy of capture, sitting on the stems of the grasses at dusk in company with dozens of Acidalia dilutaria. — A. P. Waller, Hemley Rectory, Woodbridge : August 30//*, 1902. Eupithecia innotata at Aldeburgh.—On September 10th, 1900, when beating mugwort for larvae of Cticuflia absinthii in the neighbourhood of Aldeburgh, I obtained a few larva; of E. succenturiata and several of what I took to be E. absinthiata, and the following June bred several of the latter and one of the rare E. innotata. I do not remember having noticed any difference in the larva?, which perhaps is excusable, as the larva? of E. absinthiata vary so much.— Gervase F. Mathew, Dovcrcourt : September lbth, 1902. Crambus fascelinellus at L) 'over -court. — On August 15th I took a fine example of this local species on the sandhills near here. Mr. W. H. Harwood,of Colchester, tells me that he took it here several years ago, but the capture was not recorded. —Id. Panchlora exoleta, Klug (Blattida:), imported into Scot land.— Foreign species of Blattidce. have often been received as involuntary migrants in these islands, and have sometimes obtained record m entomological publications. Mr. Robert Service of Maxwelltown. Dumfries, recently forwarded me a specimen of a beautiful species, Panchlora exoleta, Klug, which he found in a living condition among some bananas, probably derived from the West Indies, from which large quantities of the fruit are now being received in this country. The insect had died before its despatch from Scotland, but Mr. Service remarked that with a little care it would no doubt have lived in one of his warm horticultural houses.— W. L. Distant, Steine House, South Norwood : September, 1902. 248 [October, Additional localities for Limotettix stactogala, Am. — As a result of some collecting in the Hastings district during August, I am able to supplement Mr. Edwards' notice of Limotettix stactogala as a British insect, by recording some additional localities for it. During the first week in August I noticed some large tamarisk bushes forming the hedge of a cottage garden by the shore at Bopeep, St. Leonards. On the first stroke of the beating stick a number of small green Ho- mopterous larvae were revealed, which were unfamiliar, and seemed likely to be those of the novelty of which I was in quest. The identity of the species was presently set at rest by the discovery of a single imago of L. stactogala. Some ten days after I found the species in the utmost profusion on a few tamarisk shrubs at Bexhill, on a pathway in front of the town, leading down to the beach. These bushes are the last lingering remnants of what was once an extensive hedge, formerly connected, if my memory serves me, with a coast guard station which stood on the spot when Bexhill was a village. Many of the bushes are already dead, and the rest will probably soon follow. The insects here were much more advanced than those I had found at Bopeep, and in a few minutes I was able to secure some thirty or forty imagines, and could have had hundreds had 1 so wished, though there were still large numbers in the larval condition. Later in the day I again found the insect very plentiful on a tamarisk hedge around the gardens of coast guard cottages some two miles west of Bexhill. During the last week in August 1 was at Pett, on the other side of Hastings, between Winch elsea and Fairlight, there again the hedges around the coast guard stations were abundantly furnished with the pretty green Homopterou in two distinct localities. The insect thus occurs from Win- chelsea in the east to Bexhill on the west, and there can be little doubt that it will be found in other parts also where the food-plant is well established. Some years ago the tamarisk was very generally used at Hastings for garden hedges, but the old plants are being uprooted and replaced by Euonymus, and the coast guard stations now remain therefore the chief localities for the shrub and its inhabitant. Considering that where the food-plant is still left the insect is abundant, and re- membering that not many years ago its opportunities of sustenance were much more extended through the wider cultivation of its food, there seems a strong probability that the insect was formerly even commoner than it is now. and it seems strange that an attractive looking creature such as this, occurring so abundantly as it does on the coast of East Sussex, should so long have escaped detection. The tamarisk has evidently been neglected by entomologists. — E. A. Butler, 53, Tollington Park, N. : September 3rd, 1902. A few Trickoptera from Llanfairfechan. — Mr. E. Saunders, when staying at Llanfairfechan, JN'orth Wales, in July last, took, casually, the following species: — Limuophilus vittatus, F., L. centralis, Ct., L. sparsus, Ct., Goera pilosa, F., Silo paldpes, ¥., Bercea mounts, Ct., Mystacides azurea, L., Adicella reducta, McL., Hydropsyche inslabilis, Ct., Philopotamus montanus, Don., and Agapelus fusci- pes, Ct. — K. McLachlan, Lewisham, London : September 6th, 190^. A dwarfed example of Chrysopa lenella, Schnd. — At Llanfairfechan Mr. Saun- ders took a Chrysopa, the only example he saw. It proves to be Ch. tenella, but in ioo2.] 249 a very dwarf condition, the wings expanding to only 17o mm. ; the upper portion of the third cubital cellule in the anterior wings is very much reduced in size, and the dividing nervule ends very slightly before the nervule above it in one of these wings, and very slightly after in the other, the neuration is also otherwise asym- metrical.— Id. Recorded localities of British Ichneumons. — The British records of Ichneu- monidj3 appear to be so extremely few and scanty that the variety and extent of the literature which has given them birth is amazing ; and the poor monographist is expected, not only to wade through and collate everything, but also to as far as possible test its accuracy, or he is at once jumped upon by the critic. What I am anxious to obtain is as complete a knowledge as possible of such Ichneumonid.e (excluding Braconid.£) as have had their localities published ; and I here ask all and sundry who do not grudge a post card to refer me to — or better, lend me a copy of — any notice not included in the following list of works, all of which are known to contain specified localities for instanced species : — Forster's* Nov. Spp. Insecto- rum ; Donovan's Nat. Hist. Brit. Insects ; Kirby and ^pence's Introduction ; Curtis' Brit. Ent. and Farm Insects; Gravenhorst's Ichn. Europ. ; Samouelle's Ent. Cabinet ; Stephens' 111. Brit. Ent.; Encyclop. Brit.,* 1842, vol. ix ; Wesmael's Platyuri Europ. ; Desvignes' Brit. Mus. Ichn. Cat. ; Newman's Moths ; Cameron's* Fauna of Clyde (1876) ; Dale's* Lepid. of Dorset ; Berthoumieu's Ichn. d'Europ. ; and the following periodicals :— Ann. Nat, Hist. (1839) ; Ann.* Scot. Nat. Hist, ; Ent. Mo. Mag. ; Ent. Ann. (1874) ; Entom. ; Ent. Record ; Nat, Journal ; The Natu- ralist (1854) ; Young Naturalist ; Trans. Ent. Soc. ; Proc* Berwick. Nat. Field Club; Zoologist.* The only local lists I have heard of are :— Paget's Nat. Hist. Gt. Yarmouth ; Walker's Isle of Man list (Entom., 1872-73, p. 432) ; Roebuck and Bairstow's list for Yorkshire (Trans. Yorks. Nat. Union, 1877-80); Nat. Hist. Hastings with three Suppl (1878-98) ; Marquand's list of the Land's End district (Trans. Penzance Nat. Hist. Soc, 1884) ; Bridgman's Norfolk list (Trans. Norf. Nat, Soc, 1894) ; Parfitt's* Devon list (Trans. Devon Assoc, 1881, p. 241 et seqq.) ; Bignell's South Devon list (lib. cit., 1898) ; and Luff's Alderney List (Trans. Guernsey Soc. Nat, Sc, 1899). Those bearing an asterisk I have not yet examined. — Claude Morley, Ipswich : September \0th, 1902. Field Notes on Stridulation. — In this Magazine, 1901, p. 166, I drew attention to the fact that Geotrupes typhosus stridulates, at least in part, by the friction of the abdomen upon the elytra; this fact I still maintain, having tested it upon the living insect, although it is strange that the species should also possess stridulating files upon the coxae, as shown by Mr. Gahan, and confirmed (v. v.) by the Rev. H. S. Gorham. It may be interesting to here note a few further observations, made entirely in the field, upon the same subject, which appears to have been studied mainly anatomically upon dried specimens. They have probably been noted before, but Cox lias paid no, and Fowler little, attention to the subject. Necrophorus mortuorum and Geotrupes sylvaticus stridulate by rubbing the apical abdominal segments upon the elytra ; the coxae play no part, since, when the elytra are both held open, the insect is incapable of emitting sound : when one 250 [October, only is raised, the sound is thinner by half; and when the coxae are held down the sound is not impaired. Geotrupes stercorarius, L., stridulates in a similar manner, but much more feebly than G. sylvatievs. Aromia moschata, Grammoptera ntjicornis, Strangalia armata, and probably most of our indigenous Cerambycidie, stridulate by a vertical motion of the hind margin of the thorax upon the base of the elytra. Mesosa nubila also stridulates, though so weakly that I could only catch the sound on placing the insect close to my ear — out of my range of vision. Pelobius tardus raises such a " shout," as noted by Fowler, that one is at first inclined to drop so uncanny an insect ; and I have been enabled to confirm Bedel's observation on this head respecting Hydrobius oblongus, though I consider the sound comparatively strong, especially when the beetle is just taken from the water. Hydrous caraboides also stridulates distinctly, but in the last three species I have not noticed the source of the sound. Erirrhinus vorax and E. validirostris both stridulate loudly by rubbing the apex of the abdomen vertically upon the elytra ; the latter moving the while no other part of the body, though in the former the sound is often accompanied by wavings of the rostrum, which appears to be a warning attitude, and, with so well- developed an organ, is doubtless a fearsome sight. Perhaps the most interesting instances of all are to be found in the $ $ of the Mut ill idee. That of Mutilla europcea, as noted by Kirby and Spence, emits a " sibilant chirping " ; this is caused by the friction of the abdominal segments upon one another, and takes the form of two very distinct notes, of which one is produced by the apical, and a deeper by the basal segments. That of Myrmosa melanocephala always stridulates in like manner, though in only one note, feebly, seven times in quick succession, and then pauses as though to take "breath." The above are the only cases I can instance at the moment as having come under my personal observation, though many more are awaiting investigation. In the Carabidce, Staphylinidce, Chrysomelidce and Hemiptera, however, protective odours appear to take the place of stridulation ; and attention has recently been drawn to a possible stridulating organ in Anopheles maculipennis by Shipley and Wilson (Trans. Roy. Soc. Edin., 1902, p. 367).— In. : June, 1902. Alerteur.s. Proceedings of the South London Entomological and Natural His- tory Society, for 1901. 8vo, pp. 76, with two plates. London : published at the Society's Rooms, 1902. This annual summary of the work done by this old and useful London Society is thinner than its immediate predecessors, chiefly on account of only two papers being printed in full. But the reports of the excursions and ordinary meetings are extensive, and in some cases evidently embody the pith of more lengthy papers. Much of interest is to be found in these Reports, and also in the Report of the Council and the Treasurer's balance sheet. The Society is flourishing, and now numbers 174 members, and the balance sheet shows careful financial supervision ; that there is a small but progressive demand for its publi- cations on the continent shows that it is recognised abroad as of importance. This 1902.] 251 is as it should be ; the fate of numerous local Societies both at home and abroad is to be neglected, often solely because sufficient care is not taken by the executive to show how their publications (if any) can be procured. The brochure under notice has been very carefully edited, and the only sug- gestion we have to make is that, in the index, " Mollusca " should not be intercalated between " Lepidoptera " and " Keuroptera" and all in the same type, for no apparent reason other than alphabetical convenience. Oechaed and Bush-feuit Pests, and how to combat them : by Cecil Waebfeton, M.A., F.Z.S., Zoologist to the Royal Agricultural Society of England. Pp. 20, Svo, with twelve illustrations. London : John Murray, 1902. This official pamphlet (published at the nominal price of sixpence) is intended for distribution amongst British fruit growers, and should prove very useful by giving in a few concise phrases the life-history of the most destructive insect pests and allies, and the best means of prevention or cure. It is a marvel of brevity, and in this respect differs much from the long and laborious reports published in the United States and elsewhere : those familiar with both must decide as to which is the more serviceable. It is popular to the degree of omitting all scientific names, a practice of doubtful utility, because the same English name is often applied to different things, but in most cases the species is figured, though sometimes not in its perfect stage. A List of the Beetles of Ieeland : by Rev. W. F. Johnson, M.A., F.E.S., and J. N. Halbeet. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, 3rd Series, vi, pp. 535-827 (1902). This is the first general list of Irish Coleoptera that has been published. The compilers have for a long time been working at the Irish beetles ; they have them- selves collected a large number of species, and they have taken great pains to gather together the records of the earlier collectors. The result is a really valuable list ; it is true that only 1630 species are catalogued, or less than half the number recorded from the British Isles, but the workers at the Irish Coleoptera have been few and far between, and the only wonder is that so much has been accomplished. There is a very interesting introduction, dealing with questions of distribution, and the value of the work is much enhanced by the completeness of the references, together with the careful bibliography and the clear index. Three species are added to the British list, viz., Bembidium argenteolum, Ahr., and Stenus patpoms, Zett., from the shores of Lough Neagh, and Xanfholinus cribripennis, Four., from three or four localities in Ulster; the last mentioned, however, is perhaps not really different from the X. distans, Kr., of our collections. Among other interesting species may be mentioned Carabus clathratus, L., and Pelophila borealis, Payk., which seem to be much commoner in Ireland than else- where in Britain, Dyschirins obscurus, Gyll., a very interesting re-discovery, Hy- droporus obsoletns, Aube, Bides