.>^ THE (/iu%¥^ ENTOMOLOGIST'S RECOR '' AND JOURNAL OF VARIATION E])1TEU BY J. W. TUTT, F.E.S. Assisted by RiCHABD S. BAGNALL, f.e.s., T. HUDSON BEAKE, b.sc, f.k.s., k.r.s.i Geobge T. BETHUNE-BAKER, f.z.s. f.l.s., f.e.s. M. BUKK, D.sc.F.z.s., F.L.S., K.E.s. (Rev.) C. R. N. BURROWS, f.e.s Jas. E. COUnN, f.e.s. T. a. CHAPBIAN, si.I)., I.Z.S., fe.s. H. St. ,). K. ])()N)S'I HdKPE, r.z.s., f.e.s. Alfred SICH, f.e.s. J. R. le B. TOMLIN, m.a., f.e.s. Henry J. TURNER, f.e.s. George WHEELKR, m.a., f.e.s. VOL. XXII. JANUARY TO DECEMBER, 1910. PRICE 10s. 6d. Special Index (with every reference) Is. 6 (?T LONDON : ELLIOT STOCK, 62, Paternoster Row. EC BERLIN : R. FRIEDLANDER & SOHN, 11, Carlstrasse, N.W. ^ ^^' a^ t^^'^ PREFACE. In presenting vol. xxii. to our readers and subscribers, we have to thank again a large nun^ber of our friends for their kindly help. The Magazine has been filled with the usual complement of varied entomo- logical subjects, for which we have to thank, most heartily, our large body of contributors. Although we have done well with plates, the number is rather fewer than usual, and we shall be very glad for further help in this direction. Our best thanks are due to those gentlemen who have aided in giving us the illustrations for then- papers. The best thanks of the editor are due to the kindly aid of the efficient editorial staff, among whom we now have representatives of the leading students of ahnost every order of insects. We still ask for the stronger support of those entomologists who particularly confine themselves to British insects. We are always thankful to receive notes relating to collecting in Britain, and to the life-histories, habits, and distribution of British insects. Young and old collectors may again be reminded that reports from districts already well known to the old hands, read quite fresh, and are quite new, to the large body of recruits, who, every year, join our ranks. Whilst therefore thanking all those who have in any way supported the Magazine, either by their subscriptions, or by their contributions to its contents, we would again urge our supporters to bring the advantages of it under the notice of any entomologist whom they find does not yet support it. » ^ '•v . f s. I ■C z < - W' - C; JOURNAL OF VARIATION. Vol. XXII. No. 1. Januaby 15th, 1910. Retrospect of a Coleopterist for 1909. By (rrof.) T. HUDSON BEARE, B.Sc, F.E.S.E., F.E.S. The additions to onr list which I had the pleasure of recording last year \Yere more numerous than they had l)een for many years. In view of this, one might expect that there would be a lull in the outburst of activity this year, but the following records will show that the output of the present year has been quite equal to that of the precedmg one. It will be necessary, therefore, for me to condense the remarks I have to make in regard to the various additions which are to be chronicled. A few general remarks must be made, however, before I begin to record the various additions. First of all, it is necessary to point out that no fewer than seven of this year's additions are new to science ; moreover, we have, for the first time for many years, to note the addition of a new Buprestid to our scanty list of insects belonging to this family. In regard to some of this year's additions, there will be differences of opinion. We have undoubtedly entered upon an era of " species-splitting," if I may use such an expression. With our present scanty knowledge of the life-history of the majority of beetles, this creation of new species, based generally upon obscure structural differences, differences moreover which are, as a rule, only comparative, is in my view of little real service to science. It is to be observed that this splitting into species is resorted to only in the case of insects which are so minute that they have to be examined under a fairly high- power microscope before the supposed structural differences can be detected; in the case of insects of comparatively large bulk, differences far more easily observable are either never noticed, or, if they are noted, no one dreams of proposing to divide into different species insects showing such differences. Laccobiiis avutellarU, Motsch. — Introduced by Dr. Sharp, ]'!nt. Mo. Mai/., xlv., p. 217. A specimen was taken at Chobham as far back as 1878 b}^ Mr. Champion, and Dr. Sharp has himself recently captured specimens at Brockenhurst ; it is most nearly allied to siniiatus, Motsch., but is much darker in colour. Anacaena ovata, Reiche. — Mr. J. Edwards says [lor. -e, in September, 1908. Howalota parois, Muls. et Rey. — Introduced by Mr. G. C. Champion (Ent. Mo. Mai/., xlv., p. 5) on a specimen taken near Guildford. It has the general facies of H. melanaria, Man., but is not nearly so large, and has much shorter antennae. Homalota fm^Ki, ^Qvnh, — nitens, Filss. — Introduced liy Mr. G. C. Champion {loc. cit., p. 31) on a specimen taken at Mickletfam in 1875 ; it has much the general appearance of a I'lacusa. Mi/nnecopora hrecipea, sp. n. — Described by Mr. E. A. Butler (loc. cit., p. 29) from specimens taken at Tintagel, Plymouth, etc. It differs from M. uvida, Er., in its proportionately shorter antennji^ and legs; it is a less robust insect. Kpipeda niyricans, Thoms. — Introduced by Dr. .Joy {tor. cit., p. 268), on two specimens taken under pine bark at Blair Atholl, Perthshire, on September 5th, 1909. Lutkrohiinn diliitiiiH, Erichs. — This species was also introduced by Dr. Joy {loc. cit., p. 268) on specimens found under stones on the shore of Loch Ericht, and in flood refuse on the river Truim, in September and October, 1909. Bledins denticollis, Fauv. — Introduced by Mr. F. H. Fryer (/or. cit., p. 6) on specimens taken on the banks of the Nethy at Nethy Bridge. Dr. Sharp also took it at the same place. It is veicy like B. npacus, Block., but is distinguishable by the right-angled tooth-like projecting hind angles of the thorax. Tltinohiitfi pallidum, sp. n. — Described {loc. cit., p. 4) by Mr. E. A. Newbery from specimens taken by Mr. Britten under stones at the side of the river Eden, Great Salkeld, Cumberland. It may be known by its entirely testaceous colour, and the structure of the antenna'. Hoiiialiuiii brevicolle, Thoms. — Introduced by Dr. Joy {loc. cit., p. 102) on a specimen taken in carrion at Great Salkeld by Mr. Britten; it comes near to e.dc. cit., p. 129) on the strength of a specimen taken at Brockenhurst, and Mr. Champion has since that date taken the species freely at the same locality. In discussing the previous records of this species as a British insect, Dr. Sharp expressed the opinion that they were all erroneous ; he also stated that he had two specimens, one taken at Deal, and one in the New Forest, which did not agree with niiier, Panz., or with the immaculate ab. of plai/iattts. Melaunfi/tila acniiiinata, De G. — Introduced by Mr. Chiimpion [luc. cit., p. 247) on specimens taken in the pine-woods near Woking, in August and September, 1909 ; this fine Buprestid is a most unlooked- for addition to our list, and the most interesting of the year's captures. Mr. Champion gave an account of all the beetles he had taken in these pine-woods, including such insects as Criocephalm ferns, Muls., and Anc/ioineniis (ji(a(lripi(nctat)(s, De G. (Jhaetncnenia arida, Foud. — Introduced by Mr. Donisthorpe [Ent. Uecord, xxi., p. 259) on specimens taken in the Whitefield Woods, Ryde, Isle of Wight, on August 2Gth, 1909. The species comes near to hortennis, Geof., but has a narrower thorax, and thorax and head are more finely punctured. Piabocerna [Salpinaus) bisjinpi, sp. n.— Described by Dr. Sharp (Eut. Mo. Maff., xlv., p. 246) from specimens taken at Grantown, Speyside, by himself and Mr. T. G. Bishop. In the same article. Dr. Sharp described another European species new to science, R. championi, from specimens taken in Switzerland by Mr. Champion. Anaapis hudsoni, sp. n. — Described by Mr. Donisthorpe {Ent. Record, xxi., p. 60) from a specimen found at Netby Bridge in the centre of a hard, woody fungus, on Scots fir, on September 16th, 1908. The article is illustrated by a plate showing the male append- ages of the whole of the British species of the genus. 4 THE ENTOMOIiOGIST S RECORD. Pitj/'iiii'iu's tn-panatiis, Noerdl. — Introduced by Dr. Joy {Knt. Mo. Mail; xlv., p. 269) on a specimen swept up at Blair Atholl, Perthshire, on September 3rd, 1909. Edrrhesopa jordani, sp. n. — This is an exotic insect found at Kew Gardens, new to science, and described by Mr. W. E. Sharp {lor. cit., p. 221). It was introduced in a consignment of lily seeds from the Tanganyika district of Africa ; it is a very remarkable and fine Anthribid. Du'titota tratacca, Kraatz. — This insect Avas found by Mr. W. E. Sharp at Shirley, in the debris of decayed wood [Inc. cit., p. 269). It was first described from the East Indies. It appears to have become acclimatised in South Europe, and possibly may become so hei'e ; in the meantime it must go into the special list of known introduced insects. The following new varieties and aberrations have been added :— Tric/tnptcn/.v intermedia var. t/toiimoni, I. B. Ericson.— Introduced by Mr. Donisthorpe (Knt. Kecord, xxi., p. 58) on specimens taken l)y him and the writer at Newtonmore, in June, 1907. Coccinella lOpiinetata ab. conjiitem, Haworth. — This was also introduced by Mr. Donisthorpe (loc. cit., p. 136); he captured a specimen at Darenth on May 16th, 1908. Sitaris )in(ralis, Forst. ab. fiava, n. ab. — This new aberration was described by Mr. Hamm {Knt. Mo. Ma;/., xlv., p. 277) on specimens taken at Oxford ; it has the whole of the elytra, wing membrane, and abdomen clear yellow in colour. CrjiptopkwjHs palliiliia var. an/enteus, n. var. — Dr. Joy exhibited this new variety at a meeting of the Entomological Society of London, on November 8rd {loc. cit., p. 284); it differs from the type by having silvery pubescence. We have thus an addition of 28 species and 4 varieties and aberrations : two, however, are introduced species, and one at least of the others is a somewhat doubtful species. In view of the length of the above list of additions, I can only afford space for a brief notice of the capture of rare species during the year. Dr. Joy records Olophnun conuwile, Gyll., from Ben Wyvis ; Mr. Keys, Anthicus angmtatuH, Curt., from Bigbury Bay, in plenty ; Mr. Butler, Cathorniiocerus waritiinun, Rye, from Tintagel (this insect has been found recently by Mr. C. J. C. Pool, in the old localitj' — Portsmouth); Mr. Day, 21di;/ethcs subrunosus, Gyll., from Cumberland ; Mr. de la Garde, Sibinia .sot/«^/.s. Germ., and (Jardiophonis eijaiseti, Hbst., both in numbers f rom Braunton ; Commander Walker, Trimimn. hrevicorne, Reich., from Cobham Park, and Neuraphes ruhicnndus, Schaum, from Strood (Mr. Collins has also taken it at Oxford); Mr. Cameron, Emus hlrtits, L., from Sheppey, in fair numbers; Mr. Bedwell, Hetaerius ferruffinens, 01., and Cassida fastnom, SchalL, from Box Hill, and what appears to be Hi/pera meles, F., from Coulsdon ; Mr. Tomlin, Tropideren sepicola, ¥., and Cionns lonijicollis, Bris., from Harewoocl Forest. In conclusion, I may mention that Mr. Donisthorpe and the writer took Trechns rivularis, Gyll., at W^icken Fen in September. Many interesting notes have appeared in our entomological journals. Mr. Newbery {Ent. Mo. Ma;/., xlv., pp. 32 and 63), in his " Notes on various British Coleoptera," pointed out that our Adraatus limbatns, Fab., was now called on the continent A. nitididas, Marsh, EETROSPECT OF A COLEOPTERIST FOR 1909. 5 and that the At/ums nitfer, L., of our collections, was really A. kiitKs, Hbst. ; in the same article he gave some further characters for separat- ing Trachifphloeun aristatm, Gyll., and T. stjnaiiinlatns, 01., and also (H/iiiis melanocephalus, Grav., and (>. vn/niiecophilus, Kies ; he also again expressed the opinion that the insects we call Melanotits castanipes, Payk., are only large specimens of M. niripes, Herbst. I must again express my disagreement with this view. In an interesting note entitled" On the Mlanis micros of British Catalogues" {lor. cit., p. 99), Mr. E. A. Butler adduced evidence to show that this species does occur in Great Britain, having been taken at Caterham, Mickleham, Box Hill, etc. ; he thought it was possible we had another species (un- described) coming very near to J/, fiiicroti, but distinct from it. Mr. J. Edwards discussed in an article entitled " On the British species of Chalroiihs, Foudras" {loc. eit., p. 127), the synonymy of the five British species, and certainly, if we are to follow continental usage, we must change at least three of the names : chloris, Foudras, becomes pltitiis, Latr. ; K)iiayc((i(liii(i, Foudr., becomes fulvicoiiUK, Fab. ; and lu'Lviiu's, Brit. Cat., becomes anrea, Geoff. Mr. Edwards gave a new table for separating the species (I personally have never found any difficulty in doing this with the aid of the table given by Canon Fowler), and mentioned most of the colour aberrations of the various species. Dr. -Toy, in a paper "Notes on the male genitalia of Aytisn- t(>iiia amjlica, Rye, and (r)iatJionci(s nidicola, Joy " {loc. cit., p. 219), showed that Avith the aid of these characters he was able to separate definitely A. ant/iica from A. ciyoiaviomra, Pz. (in this he differs from Dr. Fleischer, who professes his inability to see any ditierence in these organs in the two forms), and (t. nidicola, Joy, from (i. rotundatiis, Kug.; in the latter ease an illustration was given to show how very different in shape this organ is in the two forms. Mr. H. Britten had a useful note on the distinctive characters of Clanibus minutiis, Sturm., and C. jinHctidion, Beck. {lor. cit., p. 250); it will be remembered that Mr. Donisthorpe remstated this latter species in our list last year. There was only one article dealing directly with mimicry, that by Dr. Chapman on "Mimicry of Phi/todcrta varictbilifi, Oliv., and L'occinella >icpt em punctata,'" L. {loc. cit., p. 18G), in which he gave an account of his observations at Amelie-les-Bains, with some remarks on Mr. Bateson's previous account of the species /'. rariahilis {Proc. Zool. Soc Lond., 1895, pp. 850-860). Of notes dealing with the distribution of our fauna throughout the country, there were several to which attention may be drawn. Dr. Joy in " A further note on the Coleoptera of the Scilly fsles " {loc. cit., p. 54) brought up the total recorded to date to 331 ; in this note he stated that he was now convinced that Snniiis li/onexsius, Joy, was a distinct species ; I see no reason to modify the opinion I expressed on this point in my "Retrospect for 1908 " (/•,'»^ llcnnd, xxi., p. 27). Mr. de la Garde gave a valuable list of coleoptera found at Braunton and other places in Devon {Ivnt. Mo. Maii., p.86j ; and Mr. Tomlin published lists of captures in the county of Hereford {loc. cit., pp. 6G and 252). Attention must be drawn to a paper {loc. cit., p. 19(3) by Messrs. Champion and Lloyd on some interesting British insects, which was accompanied by a beautiful and accurately coloured plate, illustrating seven of the most interesting additions made to our list during recent years. This plate should stimulate collectors to endeavour to add new 6 THE ENTOMOLOGIST S RECORD. records ior these species, all very rare and very local. Those coleopterists who are studying the Cassnnidae should consult Mr. Champion's notes on that family (loc cit., pp. 103, 121), in which there is much valuable information on synonymy, distribution, etc. There were two references to the dispersal or migration of coleoptera ; one by Mr. W. E. Sharp describing his experience last May at Brid- lington (Ent. Rmord, xxi., p. 164), when he found the sea-shore covered with vast hordes of Gastroidea polygoni, L., and other species of beetles, a sudden spell of warmth after severe cold having given an impulse probably to nuptial flight ; the other was an account given by Dr. Longstaff at the meeting of the Entomological Society of London on 2nd June, of a flight of Coccindla 11-pnnrtata, L., which he had witnessed about 40 miles above Khartoum {Ent. Mo. Ma;/., xlv., p. 168). Mr. Donisthorpe published {Ent. Eecord, xxi., p. 257) his Myrmeco- philous Notes for 1909, in which he gave additional localities for many ants' nest species ; the conclusion of the notes for 1908 appeared on p. 17 of that journal. In the Transactions of the Ento)iiolo(/ical Society of Londo)i for 1909, there appeared only a few papers dealing with coleoptera ; one of these, however, was a valuable memoir ; it was by Mr. A. M. Lee, the government entomologist of Tasmania, and Avas entitled, " A Eevision of the Australian and Tasmanian Malacodennidae.'' It extended to just over 200 pages (pp. 45-252), and was illustrated by five plates. Mr. Lea brought up the total known species of the family from these regions to 363 ; he described a large number of new species, corrected synonymy, and gave valuable tables for separating the species of the different genera. He drew attention to the fact that several species of Oedenieridae bear a very remarkable resemblance to certain members of the Malacodermidae in the company of which they are usually found. He instanced Pseudohjchiis lioemorrlioidalis, Fab., which is usually found with M«trio)i/n/nchiis ni/'ipennis, Fab., which it strongly resembles, in fact, like that species, it varies in regard to colour of elytra from entirely reddish to a mere tip of red at the extremity of the elytra. In pt. iii., pp. 397 and 413, Mr. Donisthorpe had two papers; the first, entitled " On the Origin and Ancestral Form of Myrmecophilous Coleoptera," gave an account of the species of coleoptera which are occasionally or often found with ants or in ants' nests in Britain, but more generally away from them ; in the second paper, entitled " On the Colonisation of new nests of Ants by Myrmecophilous Coleoptera," after discussing briefly possible hypotheses, the author proceeded to consider the evidence afforded by some of the ants-nests' beetles found in Britain ; both papers are very interesting, but much more extensive field observation is wanted before any definite conclusion can be arrived at. In " The Annals of Scottish Natural History," 1909, April, p. 76, July, p. 146, October, p. 218, Mr. F. Balfour-Browne contributed a paper on " The Aquatic Coleoptera of the Solway District," in which he summarised the previous records of this district, and gave the result of his own three years' work. The paper is characterised by the thorough- ness which we always expect from Mr. Balfour-Browne. He recorded about 120 species, and gave a full account of his discovery of such interesting and unexpected species as Bidessus i)iinvtissi;nns, Germ., and Oeldhchius lejolisi, Key et Muls. RETROSPECT OF A. COLEOPTERIST FOR 1909. 7 Two valuable local lists appeared during the year. " A Survey and Record of Woolwich and West Kent," published this year at Woolwich, the outcome of the visit of the South-Eastern Union of Scientitic Societies to Woolwich in 1907, a volume of 526 pages, contains a list of the coleoptera of that district by Mr. West ; he recorded 1350 species, and gave brief notes of the habitat and localities for each species. The second list appeared in the " Guide to thp Natural History of the Isle of Wight," edited by Mr. F. Morey, and published at Newport this year. The list was prepared by Mr. Newbery, but, owing to the fact that that gentleman omitted to con- sult several well-known colcopterists, who have for years collected in the Island, and, further, owing to the fact that for some extraordinary reason, quite inexplicable to most people, Mr. Newbery purposely omitted several interesting and undoubted records, Mr. Donisthorpe was asked to prepare a supplement to Mr. Newbery's list, which con- tained 1309 species. The supplement increased this by 125, and Mr. Donisthorpe has published {Knt. liecoid, xxi., p. 272) an addition to the above two lists, increasing the total to 1516 species. It is desirable to mention that the year has seen the beginning of a very ambitious scheme, namely the publication of a " Catalogue of Coleoptera" by Mr. W. Junk, of Berlin, the editing being entrusted to Mr. S. Schenkling ; so far three parts have appeared. I conclude my Retrospect with the feeling that the year 1909 will be one upon which we can look back with satisfaction, as one which has seen a distinct advance in oar knowledge of the coleopterous fauna of our native land. Depressaria putridella, Schiff.— A species new to Britain {wit/t tiiu plates). By ALFRED SICH, F.E.S. (Concluded from. vol. xxi., p. 281). The older British entomologists could only have had the meagre description of the " Vienna catalogue " and Hiibner's figure to work by ; it is, therefore, not at all surprising that they mistook a dark-veined form of Depreaauria yeatiana, Fab., for the genuine />. putridella, Schift". The first author to consider is Haworth. He describes a JJepresaatia pntrida (the brown -veined), and refers to Hiibner's figure of D. putridella {f.ep. Brit., p. 509, part 3, 1811). Haworth never saw the msect alive, and evidentlj^ describes a specimen taken by R. Scales. His description is an excellent one of the dark-veined form of J>. ijeatiana. Indeed, Haworth himself writes, " Ultimae (!/eatsii—i/eafia)ia) simillimje sed suflicienter diftert, venis fuscis." His description of the stigmata runs as follows: "In medio, at costam versus, puncta quatuor, quadratic pusita : horum duo antica minuta, atra ; tertimu triplo iiiajiis, rotundatiiiii, fiisrinn : quartum minutum subocellare, iride nigra, alba pupilbl." This applies exactly to />. i/eatiana, but those words I have written in italics could form no part of a description of the stigmata on the forewings of J>. putridella. Again, of the bindwings, Haworth says, " Posticie albida-, ciliis amplis, stramineis, sericeis." This is accurate as regards />. i/eatiana, but inapplicable to D. putridella, as has been already shown when comparing these two species. b THE EXTOMOL0(tIST S RECORD. This description of Hawoi'th's, which, I think, would have been veiy different if he had the real D. ptitriddla before hina, seems to form the basis of all the descriptions published under this name by British authors till that by Stainton in 1870, when he described specimens of the true species from Germany. Curtis mentions the name only in his Guide (1829). Stephens, in his Cataloi/xe of Brituh Inserts (1829), lists D. imtridella, citing Hiibner, Haworth, and Curtis. We learn here that he took the moth himself, and that it occurred within 25 miles of St. Paul's Cathedral, London. Later, in the Illustrations, Stephens describes an insect under the name of D. putridella, and mentions Norfolk and the New Forest as localities, but not the London district, though he refers to bis Cataloi/i(e. His Latin diagnosis is very similar to Haworth's, and indeed his whole description reminds one very strongly of that by Haworth. Of the stigmata be says, " Four dots on the disc towards the costa, two of which are minute and black, and placed obliquely before the middle, then a larger fuscous one, and finally a white one, with a black edge." Of the hindwings he says, " Posterior wings whitish, with pale ochreous cilia." The larger fuscous dot, the colour of the hind- wings, and the cilia point to D. yeatiana (llhist. Brit. Ent. Haust., vol. iv., p. 202, 1834). Stephens' own specimen, now in the collection at the British Museum, labelled " jrutrida" clears up, however, all doubt as to what species he had before him. This specimen is certainly D. yeatiana, but curious!}' it is almost the least-veined example of Stephens' series, the veins being only marked by dots. Above it are other specimens with quite strongly-marked veins. In fact the specimen, labelled " yeatiana,'' is much more strongly marked than that labelled " putrida.'' There is one curious point about the label attached to this specimen. Stephens himself called the species putridella, but this insect is labelled " juttrida,'' which is the name Haworth used. We know that Stephens bought some of Haworth's insects ; can this specimen be the type of Haworth's Depressaria putrida / This is hardly possible, as it has not dark veins, a feature on which Haworth insists. My own idea is that the specimen labelled " yeatiana " is really Haworth's type specimen of putrida, and the specimen now bearing the label putrida is Haworth's type of yeatsii, and further that, at some time, both these labels became in some way detached from the specimens, and were wrongly replaced. Each of these labels has two pinholes. The one bearing the word putrida is evidently con- temporary with those bearing the names purpurea, alt rem i (sic), and wediopeitinella, but the other, judging from the colour of the paper and the darker ink, seems to have been written later. If so, then that may account for its bearing the word yeatiana, instead of yeatsii, as if Haworth, in later years, adopted the name originally given by Fabricius, or as if the label had been written by another. There is an interesting figure in Wood's Inde.r (1839). It is numbered 1180, and by reference to page 172, we find it represents Depressaria putridella, the brown-veined. Wood refers to Stephens, but does not say whence he obtained the specimen he figures. The ground colour of the forewings is pale brown, near the base is a longitudinally elongate triangular dark spot from which a darker brown shade runs to the hind margin ; there are similar shades along LEPinoPTEKA AT DIGNE AND LA GRAVE IN .IfLY, l!)()i). 9 the costa and the hind margin. The discoidal spot is dark, and the space hetween it and the dark triangular mark is of the pale ground colour. The veins are strongly marked in fuscous. The hindwings, and the fringes of all the wings, are pale brown. This figure neither represents D. pidridella nor />. i/eatiana, and, after comparing the figure with various species of Deprexsaria, I have come to the conclusion that it may have been drawn from a specimen of ]>. iiltiitiella, Stt., a species not then described, though it was probably then no rarer than it is now. In the second (Westwood's) edition of this work, the figure is coloured much more like the hgure of />. yeatiana. We need not consider Rennie, as he tells us nothing that previous authors did not mention {('itusjH'ctnx, p. 18G, l(S;-32). There ]s a figure in Humphreys and Westwood's llritish Moths of a Dcpreasarta piitriiidla, but this figure is too poor to be identified with any species. The accompanying description, more or less borrowed from Stephens, again shows that, even if the authors had a moth before them when they drew it up, the insect was not J>. piitndella, Schill'.. but D. i/eatiana, Fab. {Brit. Mothn, etc., vol. ii., p. 188, pi. ciii., f. 2, 18.51). In conclusion, 1 think Mr. Green is to be congratulated on his discovery that this pretty and variable species is an inhabitant of the British Isles. My very best thanks are due to Mr. Hugh Main for his kindness in supplying me with the beautiful pliotographs from which plate \v was reproduced, and also to the authorities of the Natural History Museum who allowed me to examine the very interesting- series of this species collected from the continent by the late Mr. Stainton. Lepidoptera at Digne and La Grave in July, 1909. By (Key.) FEA.NK E. LOWE, M.A., F.E.S. Mr. A. H. Jones and myself agreed this summer upon a joint expedition to Digne and to la Grave. At Digne, where we arrived on -July 11th, we had but poor sport considering the well-earned reputation of the place. We have not to record a single species, so far as I know, that is not generally common there. As a matter of fact, insects on the whole were scarce. Of Papilio ale.mnor and Po'-n- oniniotiis inelcnf/er $ , we took respectively rather less than a dozen decent specimens between us. I got one good l'id]iii(inia ei/ea, and saw two or three more ragged specimens, one Hipnarrhia fiilia, but of Satijnis (irtea not a sign, though S. eorrhda in both sexes was tine and common. Jones was more fortunate in securing two good aberi-aut forms of Melitaea diili/nia, but I think we are both of opinion that our visit to Digne resulted in disappointment. It is quite useless to repeat the oft-told tale of things taken or noted. We packed up, therefore, and left on -luly 23rd, arriving at la Grave in the Dauphiny Alps on the 24th. This ground has been less exploited, and, though it did not prove " the El Dorado of butterfly life " surmised by our editor (Hut. llerord, ix., p. 202), it was not without considerable entomological interest. We were a fortnight earlier than the date of Mr. Tutt's visit, and also favoured with better weather, but we saw nothing of F.rehia sripw''-, which he reports from the Plateau d'Emparis, " two ' This was reported through a hipxitu calniiii for Erehia s^ti/ipie, and corrected Fnt. IxL'c. xvii., p. 214. — Er>. 10 THE entomologist's RECORD. specimens worn." By far the most interesting event of our sta^^ was the discovery, on July 29th, of Melitaea deione, on the sides of the road one mile below the village. Unfortunately, it had been out long, and was almost over, and very few of the specimens taken were fit for the cabinet. Jones secured one truly magnificent female, and for the rest we got together a short series of fairly presentable examples of both sexes. This we believe to be the most northern station for M. deione yet recorded in the French Alps. It seems to be a race of some little peculiarities of its own, and not, as might have been expected, to approach the Swiss var. ben'salensis, or to reproduce the Digne form. To my mind it is nearer to the form taken at La Granja, than to those that 1 have seen from Digne. It is altogether a darker insect. The ground colour duller, and the black tracery coarser, but it is pratically indistinguishable from specimens kindly sent me by Mr. A. S. Tetley, taken this year at Axat, Aude, Sth. France. The Spanish insects, on the average, are larger, and even more strongly marked with black, while at the same time possessing greater brilliancy than the Dauphine form, due possibly to superior condition. Among the Coenonymphids and Erebiids, it was not possible, unfortunately, to carry on the observations made by Mr. Tutt, and noted antca, vols, viii and ix, as the species ( '. iplds and (\ mtijiion were scarce, as also were Melawpin!^ indaiiipiis and M. pliarte, and in the last two from the absence of females I think not fully out. I took M. wclampna only at le Lautaret, where we spent July 31st, and M. pliarte only on the slopes at the foot of the Meije Glacier ; both were at the time very local and scarce. 3Z. Duiainpus is a small form with spots on upper wings generally reduced in number and size, exactly corresponding with the prevailing form at Pontresina. Five M. pliarte came from la Grave, on the last two days of my stay, July 81st and August 1st, taken in a restricted corner of an uncut meadow just before the rough ground that leads up to the glacier. These were quite ordinary, and might have come from Mt. Pilatus. Each species was easily dis- tinguishable, and the few obtained showed no unusual signs of approximation to each other. Of the " blues" at the lower altitude below and above the village, hlirsiitina daiiion was the most abundant, smaller and darker than those from Berisal — or Aigle — ^tending perhaps to var. ferreti, Favre — Fidi/oiiiiiiatiis escheri \va:S magnificent both in size and colour. Higher on the mountains /'. <^j-o.s- was the commonest of the genus, small and not so bright as specimens from the Simplon. Zermatt, and Pon- tresina and the black borders appear to be generally narrower and less inclined to suffusion. I got a few females. Pamassiiis delitis was decidedly common, mostly without white centres to the red spots, and some without red on upper wings, ab. inornata. In the list below, taken at la Grave between July 25th and Augustlst,I haveadded "L" tothose species noted at le Lautaret only: Papilio uiachaon, scarce; I'arnassiKs apidlo, f. deliiis ; Aporia crataeiii ; Pontia callidice : I'ieria brassica.e, P. rapae : Anthocaris helia var. aiisojiia, one worn ; Colias palaeno ? (L.) (this I chased but did not take); C. pliiconinne, C. In/ale, C. ediiaa ; Kliiiiia s/yini, very common; Heodes virf/aiireae; (Jhripwphamis hippotho'e var. euri/hia (on the Col du Lautaret the females were very fine, not quite the full black of a complete enri/hia, but with a suggestion of a central blaze of taAvny); Lmveia alriphron var. ;inrdius : Plebeiiix anina NOTES OX COLLECTING IN 1900. 11 {afijon): Latiorina orbitulitf (1); Aricia astrarche ; Pobjottnnatiis eras, P. tear us (rare), /'. ('f«:/u'i-i, J'. In/las ; Afpiades bellarfpia, A. coridon ; <}i/amris aemiariina and var. viontana (L.); Lycaena avion (1); Aijlais nrticae ; Va7iessa io : Melitaea cynthia (1 2 ^^orxi), M. phnebe, M. didyma, M. dicti/nna (rare), M. deione, M. parthenieveir. varia (scarce and worn); Brenthis ]>ales, \evj light colour, emerging, B. r«o, just emerging 800ft. above the village of la Grave on July 31st; hsoria lat/i(»iia: Aryyunis aylaio, scarce and poor, A. niobe var. eris, only two, August 1st, remarkably scarce ; Mrlavaryia yalathea : Mclanipicoi epiphron, M. tiK'laiiipits (L), M. jiharte : Krebia veto, one worn (L), K. oeine (L), one worn, /','. >ifyyne, tine, K. tyndariis, fine, both at le Lautai'et and la Grave, often ab. droiiinn: ilipparchin alcyone ; Satyrus rardida : I'ararye inoera : Epinrplude lycaon, males only , Cocmouympha iphis, C. .satyriou, <'. pcnnp/iiliis (L); Krynvu alceae (L); l^rhicola cmiiuia : Ailopaca llava : I'oirelUa sao : Hesperia alveiis. Some notes on collecting Lepidoptera in 1909. By C. W. SPERRING. Without doubt, the year 1909 opened very satisfactorily for lepi- dopterists, the mild nights of March and April producing a good number of insects. The district lamps were, as usual, well patronised by Auisopteryx aesciilaria (Kidbroolve, Elthain, and Chislehurst), while Pnlyplora flai-icomis was similarly attracted by light on the borders of the oak-wood running along the main road over Shooters Hill. Ijybeniia viaryinaria 3 s were captured sitting on the bushes at Petts Wood, Chislehurst, and males of Anipliidasys strataria were attracted in plenty by means of virgin females secured in muslin-covered boxes affixed to the tree-trunks. The latter are very sluggish, and, when released from captivity and placed on the tree-trunk, sit very still. Sallow-beating also proved very remunerative, the following turning up in the beating-tray in considerable numbers, viz., Tamiocampa yothica, T. piilrfnilcnta, T. >itabilis, T. yiacilix, T. vunida, and Faclmobia nibricosa, all at Chislehurst, with a few hybernated (Jrrhodia racriuii, which were also found in great abundance on the sallows on the railway-bank at Crown Woods, Eltbam, being more common there than any of the other species. The appearance of a 2 T. pulverulcnta in the beating- tray, was the cause of a great deal of excitement on the part of at least half-a-dozen males, which buffeted and whirled one over the other in an attempt to secure the female, until the boxing of the latter put an end to an extremely lively and interesting interlude. During the early part of April, lirephos partlieniaa turned up at Chislehurst in considerable numbers as usual, and were frequently disturbed from the heather on which they rested, only to immediately flutter off' to the tops of the birches. Many specimens were also found on the sallow- blooms, but required very careful stalking to get within striking distance. Perhaps the two most noticeable features of the early part of 1909 (from a lepidopterists' point of view) were the wonderful abundance of spring larva^ with consequent damage to enormous numbers of trees, and the wide difference between the dates usually accepted as normal for the appearance of insects and the actual appearance of the same. 12 THE entomologist's RECORD. The warm sunny days of April and May had such an excellent effect on both larvte and pupfe, that the end of the latter month saw ('ii/jido iiiiniinus in profusion on the chalk-hills of the south coast (Portsmouth), accompanied by Rtimicia phlaeas, Coenonyuipha pamphiluSf I'objoinmatns icarus (nearly all males), Celatttrina anjiolus, A/piades t/u'tis [bellarfius) (Ventnor), Aricia astrarche (Ventnor), Brenthis eiijihrosune ( Waterlooville, Hants.), Enddo'e carda mines, Pieris rapae, P. napi, and /'. bras^icae, Xisnniadcx taf/es, and CaWiphriis rubi (Shoreham, Kent), while the hybernated Vanessids, I'urameis atalanta and \ ani'i. dilntata on one lamp. The larviE of Diloba coeruleocepliala were also found in al)undaiice, between 40 and 50 being tumbled out of a hawthorn hedge at Waterlooville, Hants, during the first week of June, in less than half-an-hour, while larva^ of Crocallis eliiuiuaria, Abraxas //rossidariata, Poecilocaiiipa populi, Arctia caja, Cosinotn'r/ie jintatoria, Triphaena ia)itliiita, T. praniiha, < 'ahjiiinia trape::ina,ete., v^'eve equally common. Walking through the rough herbage of the hillside at Porchester, or beating the hedgerows adjacent, one disturbed Bapta temerata, Axpilates ochrearia, Venilia viacidata, (!/riasiiiia clathrata, Lobophora seicalisata, Coreiiiia femujata, ('. toiidentaria, Atuoebe riridaria, Xanthnrlio'e sociata, X. niontanata, Anaitis pkujiata, Kndidia mi, Acontia Inctiiosa, and Hipocrita jacoboeae, with one female Diajdiora mendica at rest on the hedgebank, a very light form of Apatela aceris at rest on a sycamore-trunk (Ventnor), and a nice banded form of I'riaena psi at rest on a fence (Waterlooville). A walk through the adjacent pinewoods gave Thera variata (one specimen only), and dusking in the same SOME NOTES ON COLLECTING IN lllOil. 18 locality Apanwa nonina and Hcpialiis lii/m/iini,^, iho only insect taken at sugar being (irannnesia tr'Kjraiinirica. One specimen of Aiujiades sylraniin was captured on June 4th, and also Hcfijicria molrae, the date mentioned ])eing a very early one for the insect in question. The collecting on the south coast was carried out during Aveek ends, and also during a week comprising the last few days of May, and the first week of June. Work nearer to London was, however, in force during the earlier days of the week. Searching for larvie, the writer was pleased to find that of T.asiocainpa ijiicrcus at the back of Shooters Hill, showing that it had not entirely forsaken its old haunts despite the growth of greater London, and that motor traffic passed constantly, while larva^ of < 'nsmotrichi' /lotatana were largely in evidence. Dusking at Chislehurst gave Scoliopteiy.r libatri.r, Ejilnjra jicndiilaria, Tcplnosia junictulayia (on tree-trunks), (Tonodoritis buleiitofa , and Cahcra pnmria, with the following at Shooters Hill, ri\., Anticha bailiata, Aatlwna randidata, lodis lartearia, <'ainpt(i(ira}inita bilineota, tiHinia crataei/ata, Apatiwa badlinea (Kidbrooke, May 28th), and Hi/driuinena itnphniata (Blendon, June 13th). Sugar during the spring and early summer gave exceedingly poor results, constant wet days and cold nights spoiling any possibility of good results, and even such insects as were captured, were generally in poor condition, the only ones to record for June being Dipteryriia srabriiisrida, XijlDpliasia lithoxylca, X. viono(fl>/p/ta, iivaphipliora aiiyur, Xaenia tj/pica, yortiia festiva, Tn'phaena proniiba (also on the wing in mid-September in perfect condition everywhere), Phloyophora tiieticiddsa, and Mcoiiestra brassirat', with Dasydiira piidibidtda at light, a very sorry list for several nights' work at Crown Woods, Eltham. A newly-emerged Hylopldla praainana was taken at rest on a nettle stem (Blendon), T/icrctra porcelliis (Ciilham, Oxon), ParaHeivia plantayijiis (South Downs, Hants), all in June, and Mdanoryia yalatca (Shoreham, Kent), Knndia hyperanthtts (Cudham), and Epiiifphcie tithonuH (Portsdown Hill) in July. At this time (July) the breeding- cage was giving large numbers of Anthrocera /ilipendulaeivom collected pupai from the last-mentioned locality, Porthesia siviilis (Blendon larvte), Kupructia ehrysorrhoea (Southend, larv* collected in autumn of 1908), Plasia iiinneta (larvae collected at Shoreham, Kent), and a few Kiitrifha (pienifolio, and iMsincanipa ijiierci'is from larvte taken on hawthorn at Culham, Oxon, earlier in the year. Dusking from mid-June till end of July, secured Acidalia atrrsata (Kidbrooke), llcpicdna hcrtiis (Chislehurst), and H. lutmidi (Black- heath), Lozoy 1(1)11 Ilia petraria (Chislehurst), Metrocoiiipa maryaritaria, and Kiichloiis puatidata (Shooters Hill), llciiicropldla abrnptaiia (Blackheath, at rest), Mamestra perdcariae (Blackheath), Acidalia imitaria (Shooters Hill), Mesoleiira albicillata (Chislehurst), Srotoaia vetidata (Chislehurst), Xanthorho'e sociata (Eltham), Hypcna probosci- dalis (Chislehurst), XactKa trianyidum (Chislehurst), and Asthena vandidata (Eltham), also the day-fiying Oit/mlitlia liniitata (Cudham). During the first three weeks in August, the writer w'as practically unable to undertake any field work, but in the last week of that month took a trip to Devon, staying inland about three or four miles from Sidmouth, Devon. Probably the stormy weather of the several weeks preceding accounted for the poor condition of many of the insects 14 THE entomologist's RECORD. seemed. Pulyoiiiniatiis icartis appeared to be entirely over, only two ragged specimens being observed, but Pararge iiie(/aera was observed in profusion, there being literally dozens of them on the wing, some of them too worn for cabinet purposes, but others in excellent condition. Vaneaaa io did not appear to be very abundant, but Pi/ranteis atalanta was prevalent everywhere. The borders of the oak-woods gave Bithys (jiierrits, and, in the shady lanes, both worn specimens of the second brood oi Para n/e eticria and newly-emerged specimens of a possible third brood of the same were on the wing, the latter being secured in con- siderable numbers by a fellow collector in the week following. Not a single specimen of either I'ljraineis carchii or Colias edusa was observed, although the clover-fields were carefully walked through each day (the latter insect seems to have been very uncommon every- where this year. One specimen of this insect travelled over from the continent this year, to the writer's knowledge, and when last seen was observed feebly flattering on the decks of a cargo boat at London Bridge). A very beautiful specimen of Iliimicia phlaeas was observed, the margins of both fore- and hindwings being outlined with white, but, unfortunately, a net was not at hand, and an attempt at capture with a cap, was a failure. The insect, however, was sufficiently still for some little time, to permit of inspection at a short distance. At sugar in the same district, Ainphipyra pijraniidea occurred in large numbers, both light and dark forms, this insect being also observed at sugar at Chislehurst in the second week in September, in perfect condition, whereas they were going over fast in Devon at the end of August. Pharetra riimicix, Mania luaara, Hydroecia nictitan.s, Noctiia iniibrosa, Scolioptery.c libatria-, I'Idngopliora )iipticidosa, and Aiiiphipyra tragopoyonia, also visited the sugar-patch. Ejdnne apiciaria and LithoHla lurideola came to light, while Abra.ras giossidariata, Mesuleiica ocdlata, XanthorJuH' sociata, Coreniia ferriiyata, and (,'. mioiitata were taken on the wing at dusk. Beating for larv:^ in the same district, proved quite a failure, only JJasychira jnidihnnda and Ainphidasys bettdaria being secured. Field-work near London was resumed immediately (September). As usual, the males of Notolophiis {Orgyia) antiqua were common, and specimens of the second- brood of Celastriiia aryiola>< were frequently observed (Bu^chwood and Shoreham, Kent); also a worn specimen of Aryynnis aylaia (Shoreham, Kent), and Agrotis agathina at light (Chislehurst). Larva-beating at Birchwood, on the banks of the railway, gave Amorpha popiili (aspen), and Lophopterya; canielina, Drepana lacertinaria, and Dasychira padibunda from birch. Examples of the second-brood of Anaitis plagiata were taken on the wing both at Eltbam and Westerham (Kent), and BryophHa peiia on the lichen-covered, walls at the last locality, likewise Thera finnata (on pine), and Corenna propugnata at rest on an oak-tree trunk. Larvte of Triaena psi were common towards end of September (Eltham and Blackheath), Hylophila pram' nana (Chislehurst), and several of SmerintJius oceUatUy were picked up, evidently wandering about looking for a suitable spot for pupation ; also one Maniestra pisi at the former locality. Sugar, at Chislehurst in September, resulted, as usual, in the attraction of considerable numbers of Ortho&ia macilenta, also Anchocelis {CJmpha- loscelis) limosa, Mellinia circellaris, Phlogophora meticidosa, Peridrorna {Agrotis) saucia, Asphalia dilitta. MYRMECOPHILOUS NOTES FOR ISKHI. 15 Catnlora nii/ita was fairly common, as usual at the street lamps (all males Blackheath), also Ennonins tiliaria (alnian'a), and T/iera rariata (last named locality). October, at Chislehurst, saw great numbers of On-limUa iaai>iii both at sugar and at rest on the tree-trunks, a very fine series being- secured, including most of the known aberrations. Only one specimen of Onhodia liijiila was secured, though several hundred specimens of the genus were examined. ScniH'ldsonia (Kii})silia) safellitia was very common, but there were few J//.sx'//« o.vijacantliae, though both type and ab. cajiiirina were taken. During both October and November, Hiiiiera jicnnaria, including well-suffused examples, were attracted to light or found at rest on birch twigs, as well as Hybernia defulian'a and H aurantiaria, Chriniatobia hrtimata, ('. horeata, and Oporabia Jilutato. Myrmecophilous Notes for 1909. By H. St. .J. K. DONISTHORPE, F.Z.S., F.E.S. [Concluded from vol. xxi., p. 291.) Chalc'idid.e. — SpalanctIa erythkomkra, Foerst. — This species occurred with its usual host, Imsjiis fnliiii)it)^iis, at Darenth Wood, in July. I have taken various other Chalcids in ants' nests, but have been unable to get them named at present. HeTEUOPTERA. PlEZOSTETHUS FORMICETORUM, Boh. — I tOok this insect sparingly with Foriinca riifa at Nethy Bridge, in May. This is another new locality for the species. It has now been found at Braemar, Rannoch, and Nethy Bridge in Britain. Bracomd.e. — EuPHORUs BisTiGMATicus, Morley, Kut. Mu. Maij., 1909, p. 212. — T captured 2 s hovering over nests of F. rufa at Wey- bridge and Bewdley Forest, in July. It was first taken in Britain by me at Weybridge, in July, 1906 (see Ent. llec, 1907, p. 5), and I bred a g in my F. rufa observation-nest, June 13th, 1907 (see Fnt. Fiec, 1907, p. 256). Mr. Hamm has taken it over /''. rufa nests in the New Forest. Wasmann has found it at Luxemburg with F. nifa and F. pratensis. The 2 s hover steadily over the ant, gradually getting nearer, and when they get the chance strike at it to lay an egg. The ants often notice its presence, and reach up to try and drive it away. Spilom.ma falconivibrans, J^Jorley [Ent. Mo. Ma;/., 1909, p. 211). — Morley has described this new genus and species from specimens, J s and $ s, bred by me in an observation-nest of F. fuKca, from Porlock (see Ent. Hec, 1907, p. 255). Pachylomjia buccata, Breb. — I captured a 2 hovering over a nest of Lasias niijer at St. Helens, Isle of Wight, on August 29th. In the Ent. Mo. Ma;/., 1909, p. 209, Morley records the few known British examples. Marshall found the 2 s associating with Mi/nnica scabri- nodis. Giraud found both sexes hovering over a society of very little ants. De Gaulle found it associated with Lasius bnonwns and .W. scahrinodis. AspiLOTA NERVOSA, Hal. 3 .—This is a small Braconid that I took in a nest of Laaius fuliiiiiiosKs, last June, at Darenth Wood. I sent it to Morley, who writes as follows : " I am satisfied that it is Aspilota nervosa, Hal., of which Marshall gives a lot of vars., which he thinks are probably all good species. Yours is var. 6, of which only the >iiis jianis, Virtuous Lady Mine. April 20th, Bradgate Park, May 3rd, and Forth Bridge, May ISth. LiELAPs myrmecophilus, Berl. — In plenty as usual with L. riutterfiies, pi. Ixi., fig. 5) £9; A. adippe var. cleodoxa (W. G. Pearce, New Forest, July 27th, 1895), with others, 16s. ; A. niobe (Chichester, September 19th, 1895, S. M. Scholefield), with six A. adippe, 14s. This is funny, especially the date, as the species is well over at 8000ft. elevation in the Alps in August. If the A. niobe were British, it would be, judged by " Di.spars," worth at least £50, if foreign (or an escape!) worth Id., but someone gives 14s., estimated, it has been suggested, by adding together the British and foreign value £50 Os. Id., dividing this sum by the 100 to 1 chance that it is not British, leaving 10s. for this, and 4s. for the A. adippe; J)ryas papltia, with blotches of valesina coloui', which was once publicly stated not to exist in these specimens, fetched Gs. and 10s.; a remarkable rayed cT (New Forest, 1897), broken, £1 2s.; 20 THE entobiologist's record. another, with dark margin and small submarginal spots (Watford, July, 1895), £1 5s. ; another, with the left side ralesina, the right hind- wing deficient in pigment, together with several examples with bleached spots, £1 2s.; whilst a fine silvery-white AnlaU urticae (Dover, August 11th, 1874) produced £3 ; a fine form with the costal black blotches broadly confluent and very dark hindwings (Bexley, 1909), £2 5s. ; a similar one, but larger, and rayed with blue on the forewings (Bexley, 1907), £2 10s. ; a curious smoky aberration of Vanessa io without the pigment (Sligo), £2 2s.; Pyrameis conhd, the white costal blotch absent (Dover, 1872), 10s. ; IJnumitis sibi/lla, white bands obsolete (New Forest, July 11th, 1901), £1 10s. ; another, with band very obscure in forewings and absent in hindwings (New Forest, July 8rd, 1901), £1 ; Melananjia galatea, hindwing suffused with black, brought lot 89 up to £1 10s., and two other aberrations (lot 90) to £1 Is.; a fine Epinephele ianira, unicolorous light brown 5 (Williamson, St. Margaret's Bay, 1876), fetched £1 6s.; a "white" aberration of Hipparchia sewele (Arhngton, July 17th, 1902) £3 3s. ; a dark 3 (New Forest) and very pale J £2 5s.; £'»oc?/« A//p('rrt»?/(».s- with large streaked ocelli, £2 ; and another similar, £1 15s. The ChrijsophaiiKu dispar produced, 3 s, £8 5s., £3, £2 12s. 6d., £3, and £3 each ; 2 s, £3 3s., £3 7s. 6d., £2 5s., and £1 10s. each, and a 3 underside £2 ; three gynandro- morphous PZ^ft<^ms aef/on fetched 18s. ; Cyaniris sewiavfjus [3 and ? ), £1 5s. ; 3 , ? , and ? underside, £1 Is.; a gynandromorphic I'olymii- matus icarus, left side 3 and right side J (Dover, July 7th, 1873), produced 18s.; another left side ? right side 3 (no data) 15s.; whilst lot 148 [with a fine blue Ayriades thetis {beUanjus) $ masquerading as /'. icaruft] , went up to 17s.; a fine " grey " or " leaden "3 oi A. thetis £2 12s. 6d.; two ab. striata and one ab. obsoleta 18s. ; a 3 with white underside, £2 ; another ab. striata with an ab. obsoleta, £2 2s. ; a opidi went at 14s. and lis. each; a fine asyni- inetrical ab. of Mimas tiliac l)i'onght lot 200 up to i'l 4s., and a fine unicolorous ab. (lot 202) up to £2 7s. 6d. The beautiful series (ten) of this species (figuretl Kntoiii. Lievovd, 1891, p. 317) produced £5 10s., whilst two other interesting series (15 and 13 specimens resp2ciively) fetched &\ 2s. and £4. The Anthrocerids produced 7s., 7rf., 6s., 5s., lis., 12s., 17s., 9s., 18s., and 13s., per lot. A specimen of Setina irrorella ab. sif/nata, 5s.; series of Xnla albulalis (8) and iY. centnnalu (9), £1 12s. 6d. per set; a specimen of Kulcpia vribrmn with white hindwings (Bright, New Forest), 4s. ; another, with a pale Kuthoitnnia nissula, 14s. ; two Eitchelia jamhaeoc (one with suffused hindwings, the other with left hindwing yellow, but nervures and base red), 12s.; another E. jacohame with yellow hindwings (Wicken Fen, 1898) brought lot 238 up to 14s.; whilst some good abs. of ( '(dli)iu>yplia doininnia, (■. heia, and Xenieopliila plantai/inis produced 10s., £1 Is., 9s., 10s., 10s., 16s., and £1 for successive lots, the X. plant (Kjin in looked as if they were worth more ; a fine Spihtnoma viendica ab. niiiiottiariiinata and other abs. brought lot 247 up to £2 2s. The Antia caia fetched very mixed prices, the first 29 went for 24s., then lot 255 (2), 10s.; lot 256 (2), 8s.; lot 257 (1), £1 12s. 6d.; then 43 for £1 2s.; but lot 265 (1) (Gravesend, 1901) produced £8 8s.; lot 266 (1) (Harwood, East Suftblk, August, 1903), £4 15s.; lot 267 (the ab. darld, figured J'hit. /.'«•., 1909, p. 88), £8 8s.; lot 268 (1) (Harwood, Colchester, July, 1903), £6 ; then 12 for £1 2s.; lot 272 (3), £2 ; then 56 for £1 5s.; lot 282 (1) for £2 5s.; lot 283 (1), £2 16s.; then 8 for 3s. finished off this species. Four fine Arctia villica produced £1 Is., £1 Is., £2 2s., and £1 6s. each ; but the series of Spilosoiiia lubricipi'da, S. mcnt/iastri, and S. nrticae fetched very low prices. For the purpose of monographing Sayrothripiia nndidaniis {rerai/ana), similarly to his treatment of Feronea cristana, Clark had collected 352 picked examples, and these were unfortunately split, and not bought, as one had hoped would be the case, by one person in order to treat them as Clark had intended. They were sold as lot 217 (66 specimens), £1 7s. (Bright); lot 218 (79 specimens), £1 5s. (Hanbury); lot 219 (78 specimens), £1 4s. (Hanbury); lot 220 (6 specimens), £3 (.Janson); lot 221 (83 specimens), £1 (Hanbury). It is stated in the " Catalogue " that lot 220 contained Curtis' types of ab. stonanns and ab. ranndaniia: one would like to know on what grounds; it is rather improbable, one would suspect, and certainly we should like to know the evidence on which the supposition is based. Among the 2euzerids were three interesting examples of Zen una pi/rina, one with the central spots of forewings large and confiuent, sold for £2; another with coalesced spots £1 4s., and another with spots large and confluent, £3 15s. A series of Laelia voenom produced 17s., 14s., 18s., 17s., and 13s. for pairs ; and 21s. and 18s. (for 2 J s and 1 ? ); 21s., 16s., and 18s. for 2 3 s and 2 ? s in each case, whilst 4 J s and 2 $ s produced £1 4s.; a dark ab. of Dasijc/nra pudihunda (New Forest, 1895) and others, produced £2 10s.; whilst the series of black and intermediate forms of I'sHma mnnaclia (figured Ent. Record, 1892, and of foreign origin), produced 16s. Some good Cosmotnche potatoria fetched £1 4s. ; a J Satuniia pavonia, with obsoletely marked hindwings, and a white ? , £1 6s. ; and 22 THE entomologist's record. a S Diniorpha versicolor with orange-yellow hindwings (Berkshire, bred, 1902), £1 4s. ; Avhilst a Douholivnis fdni (stated to have been taken at electric light at Brighton by William Scrase, September 3rd, 1894), produced 12s, One feels that one Avould like to know the nearest continental locality of this species to Brighton. Drepana harpai/ida (Leigh Woods) produced {erancistn(s, Lameere uec Serville, has already been shown to be composed of very divergent elements, and the species have been spread among Prosteriiddes, Thoms., Ih'ra)icititn(s,Serv. {sens, restr.), Salenoptera, Serv., HolonntuK, Thoms., Klateropsis, Chevr., and Spfienostethus, Hald. All these have been well defined, and 26 THE entomologist's record. Lameere diagnoses them and divides the species up among them ; he also gives in tabulated form a resume of the genealogy of the groups under these names, and, having shown the value of all this detailed work, and the relationships of the groups, sinks the names entirely as subgenera, so that we read — Genus: DERANCISTRUS, Serville. Subgenus : Pkosternodes, Thorns. Species : Derancistrus cinnamipennis, Chevrolat. Denmcistrus oberthiiri, Gahan. Derancistrus scutellatus, Galiaii. Subgenus : Deeancisteus, Serville. Species : Derancistrus anthraciniis, Gahan. Derancistrus elegans, Pal. de Beauv. Subgenus : Solenopteka, Serville. Species : Derancistrus thoniae, Linne. Derancistrus parandro'ides, Lameere. Derancistrus hilineatus, Fab. Derancistrus canaliculatus, Fab. etc., etc., etc. That is Derandatrun, Serville, whilst standing for the naturally restricted genus, containing anthraciniis and elegans, is also maintained for the whole of the species in the group, in order to maintain the necessary binomial nomenclature to include this name, and thus, in the Catalogue, the whole of this natural grouping is lost. Lameere's diagnoses show distinctly that t'rosternodes, Thoms., Derancistrus, Serv., Solenoptera, Serv., Holonotns, Thorns., Elateropsis, Chevr., and Sphenostethus, Hald., are sound sections, and that Solenoptera, Serv., does not = Derancistrus, Serv., yet, instead of giving these proper generic rank as sections of the tribe Derancistridi — he calls the tribe the genus, gives one of the included generic names a double meaning, and then loses the proper genera under the sunken titles of subgenera. What Lameere's classi- fication really shows is — Tribe: DERANCISTRIDI (-DERANCISTRUS, Lam. »(;c Serv.) Genus : Prosteknodes, Thoms. Species : Prosternodes einnamipennis, Chevrolat. P. oberthiiri, Gahan. P. scutellatus, Gahan. Genus : Derancistrus, Serville. Species : Derancistrus anthracinus, Gahan. D. elegans, Pal. de Beauv, Genus : Solenoptera, Serville. Species : Solenoptera. thomae, Linne. S. parandro'ides, Lameere. ;S'. bilineatus. Fab. S. canaliculatus. Fab. etc., etc., etc. Surely a simpler arrangement, and one that shows the real relationship of the species, inter se. Why maintain a binomial nomenclature if the two names are not (1) the specific name, (2) the generic name, uniting the most closel}^- allied species into the next highest group above species ? The species included in the group Pyrodes, Serville, also appear to be capable of subdivision into a number of natural sub-groups or genera, and hence Pyrodes seems also to be of tribal value. Dr. Eichelbaum, in his paper, follows the normal and more natural grouping, and we get the Staphilinid.e divided up into — Subfamilies — -Tribes- — Genera— Species. Here we get no " subgenera." If the sections into which a "genus" has been subdivided by previous workers are not, in the author's opinion, warranted, the names are CURRENT NOTES. 27 clropped, or, if they are considered sound, thej' are given generic rank. There is, at least, no attempt to diagnose the various sections of a gi'oup under dift'erent names, show what species belong to each group, and then drop the names as purposeless. " The egg is green and laid on cabbage." Such was the favo\irite formula of our earlier entomological authors if they ever mentioned the egg of the pai'ticular species of lepidoptera they were describing ; a very slightly modified form is sufficient for most makers of entomological books now. Buckler and Hellinsfirstcommenced to give short intelligent diagnoses of the eggs of the species of lepidoptera whose biology they attempted to unravel. Edwards did the same, but Scudder went much further, and showed us how to describe the egg so as to bring out its scientific detail. So few, however, were done when Dr. Chapman attempted to show us the value of the egg-characters as an aid to classification [Trans. Knt. Sac. Land., 1893), that most of us found ourselves in a state of hopeless ignorance concerning the eggs of even the most common species. So far as we were concerned, we found that when we were collecting the material for our yatmal Histonj of British jA'pidnpti'va, that practically everything had to be done, and, in our very little spare time, whenever eggs of lepidoptera came our way we made a few notes about them, even if only a hand lens was available, and we were wandering from one place to another on our annual summer holiday. This mode of work has naturally been unsatisfactory, but there are many eggs of which these notes are the only descriptions available. As the volumes of the Xatural HUtoroZo)i»s, Zell., in the British Museum coll., came from " Shar Deresy, North Syria," so that it seems possible for an odd example to appear wherever A. thetis and A. coridon occur together. We have left calydonius, Lowe, out of consideration, as Wheeler is in doubt whether it is to be referred here. So far, too, we have only dealt with the ^ form, but, in working over our material very closely, we found, among our coridon J s, an undoubted $ of this form, captured at Neu Spondinig, August 12th, 1909, with beautiful violet lunules edging the marginal spots of the hindwing. It is quite distinct from any other example of either species that we have ever seen, and its reference to polonus has been immediate by every expert to whom it has been submitted. As bearing on the possible hybrid origin of A. polonus, we would call attention to NOTES ON MELAMPIAS EPIPHRON. 31 the facts that (1) The iiniloubted specimens enumerated above, have all been taken where both species occur. (2) The ^ genitalia are almost precisely alike in both species. (B) Sabine notes {Proc. Sth. Land. E)it. Soc, 1886, p. 61) that he once took & ^ A. theth in copula with a 2 J. coridon. (4) The chief (? only) food plant of both species, in places where both occur, is HippDcrepis co)iiosa. Now that the various blue races of A coridon found in Asia Minor and Spain have been referred to the names originally given to them, and polonus, Zell., retained for the form that Zeller described, it w^ould be interest- ing to learn whether an}^ other examples than those noted above are to be found in any British or Continental collection. Notes on Melampias epiphron, its habits and habitats in Cumberland. By GEORGE WILKINSON. Melampias epiphron is one of our characteristic Cumbrian insects, and for this reason it has always possessed a special interest for me, and these stray notes may, I hope, be found of interest to others. Melampias epiphron is essentially a mountain species, and, in Cumber- land, is seldom taken at an elevation of less than 1500 feet. Below this height it may be taken rarely, and, on one occasion, I noticed an individual of this species as low as the foot of Green Gable, near the farm of Seathwaite ; but the occurrence of specimens below the 1500 feet level, is probably due to their being blown down by strong winds. With regard to the special nature of its habitat, an erroneous impression seems to be prevalent. The general impression is that this species is partial to high-lying, marshy places. Stainton, in his " Manual " says, " always at a great elevation in marshy hollows on the mountain-sides ; " and an entry in a MS. diary in my possession reads, " June 30th, 1888, E. cassiope, at the head of Teesdale, on marshy, peaty ground ; " but my own observations do not confirm those just quoted, nor do they support the general impression that M. epiphron shows a preference for marshy ground. On several of our Cumbrian mountains it certainly does occur in marshy places, but it appears to have a stronger partiality for 'dry, stony places; for, in the latter localities, one can always find it in greater abundance. It is found in some numbers ail around Styhead and Sprinkling Tarns, but it is much more abundant on the rough boulder-strewn ground, which surrounds the foot of Great End and Sprinkling Tarn, than on the more boggy ground about Styhead Tarn. As regards the distribution of M. epijdiinii in Cumberland, it may be said to occur on all our Cumbrian mountains possessing the requisite elevation and suitable ground. Its headquarters are undoubtedly at the head of Honister Pass, and behind Honister Crag. On Dubs Moor, near the Drum-house — or Windlass-house — belonging to the Slate Quarries, the species abounds in company with Xemeophila pla)tta(/i)iis and Crambas ericelliis, M. epiphron is not un- common on Helvellyn, and all around Ambleside ; it is very well- established on all sides of Scawfell, Great Gable, and the Haystacks; and the area of its distribution extends almost without a break from Grasmere on the east, to Ennerdale Water on the west. At Styhead and Honister at the end of June and throughout July, I have collected A/, epipliron under the most diverse climatic conditions, and have been able to take specimens even on the wettest days. On wet, dull days. 32 THE entomologist's record. it may be taken by opening and searching the tufts of grass which grow on the mountain sides ; the number taken by this method averaging about ten in an hour. 21/. epip/irnn is on the wing as early as 6.40 a.m., and continues in flight until about 4.0 p.m. ; there is a slight break about noon, and it appears to be most abundant between two and four in the afternoon. After the latter hour, the numbers seen in flight gradually decrease, and they can then be found at rest on the grass stems. As evening draws on, they make their way into the centres of the grass-tufts, and can then only be found, as on wet days, by opening and carefully searching the tufts of grass. On a fine, bright day, in suitable localities, one may be sure to find M. epiphmn gently flitting to and fro like flakes of soot carried by the breeze ; but sunshine is necessary to tempt the species take to flight. I have noted its habits on days with dull and bright intervals, and have found the insects during the dull periods sitting low amongst the herbage, very often on the flowers of Tormentilla, with wings widespread, waiting for the sun to break forth. As soon as they feel the influence of the sun's rays, they close and open their wings a few times before gently taking flight. To and fro they flit, generally about two feet above the ground. The flight is somewhat W'eak, and M. epiphron would be an easy insect to capture, but for the fact that there is generally a breeze blowing more or less strongly in the localities inhabited by the species, and the insect either permits, or cannot prevent, its being carried by the breeze, very often quite out of the range of sight. It is generally between two and four in the afternoon, the favourite time of flight, when pairing takes place. Apparently the ? is not possessed of strong powers of attraction, for only once have I noticed more than one i. — My father netted several and saw others flying in the sunshine in Llandogo, but I did not come across a single specimen, although col- lecting in what appeared to be suitable localities on this side of the river, riiratjwatohia fuli(jinosa. — One 3 was attracted in the house by 40 THE entomoloctIst's record. light on August 7th, Spilosoma lubricipeda, S. wenthaatri, ])(t:<>i(hira piidibiiiida, ()riiyia antiqua. Denias corijli. — Until last season, all the lai'Vfe I have found of this species have been very plain, practically unicolorous with a more or less smoky line down the back and always on beech. In September I found, on birch, a beautifully variegated larva which I describe : Dorsal band wide and black, rather lozenge- shaped at each segment, the outline well-defined ; a wide band of the same hue along each side joining up with the dorsal band at the 5th segment onwards ; between these two bands a narroAV streak of buff- coloured, transverse strife, intersected by a thin, wavy, black line, and rather interrupted at the 10th and 11th segments by a smoky-black clouding ; below the band along the side, commencing about the middle, are six snow-white, diagonal and rather hook-shaped protuberate markings, the last one continuing as a streak to the anal flap (these became yellowish a day or two before the larva spun up) ; the pencils of hairs on the 1st segment and the erect tufts on the 4th, 5th and 11th segments, a rich, deep brown ; warts emitting soft white hairs, while those on the 11th and 12th segments have also a few long, black hairs mixed with the shorter white. Fuecilocainpa jinpuli. — On June 29th I found a full-grown larva in a crevice in the trunk of a damson tree a few inches from the ground. Two days later it spun up at the bottom of a chip box under a leaf ; the cocoon, both in colour and shape, greatly resembles a fancychocolate. L'oi^uwtrichc ptitatoria, Drepana falrataria, Cilix (/laucata. Centra hllida. — I bred a fine ? from a larva I found in 1908 on poplar at Tintern ; the first specimen we have obtained in the Wye Valley, although we have several times found old and empty cocoons on poplar trunks. Notodonta dromedarim. Petasia cassinea. — At light, Tintern. Dilnba caentleocephala, Gonopliora derasa, Thyatira batis, CyinatopJiora dilitta, Asphalia fiavicornis. Acronycta lepnrina. — I found two larvas ; both, unfortunately, were " stung." Triaena psi. Craniophnra liyiintri. — I bred one from a larva found in 1908, but no amount of searching will produce another, althoughthereareplenty of ash-trees and privet bushes to hunt on. Pha- retra rtiuiicia. Ai/rotis pnta. — One at treacle; the first I have seen since leaving the London district. A. e.irlaiiiationi-t. Lycapliotia strii/ula was fairly common at dusk during July, flying over heath. Trip/iaena iantliina, T. orbona, T. pronuba, Nocttta (/lareosa, N. triaiu/nliiiii, N. brminea. N. festiva. — The males were to be obtained in plenty on the heathy ground, but, as usual, no females. I wonder if other collectors find a difficulty in procuring the females of this moth ! Feeling- curious as to their seemingly secretive habits, I shall be much obliged if somebody will give me some hints how, when and where to obtain the females otherwise than by breeding them from larvae found in the spring. N. baja, N. rnbi, N. nnibrosa. N. xanthoyrap/ta was most variable ; one form to be taken here is rather undersized, a very dark chestnut-brown, so dark that the lines of black spots are only faintly visible, the orbicular spot totally obscured, and the reniform nearly so, the latter represented by a faint reddish spot. Charaeas yraviinh was obtained by us for the first time in the Wye Valley, my father taking- several <3^ s at light at Tintern, and I one 3- at light and a ? netted at dusk. Neiironia popularis, Lnperina cenjjiti.i, L. testacea, Aplecta nebulosa, Hadena contiyiia, H. yenistae, H. dentina, H. protca, Mamcstra brassicae, M. persicariae. Hecatera nerena (?). — At the end of August LEPIDOPTERA IN GLOUCESTERSHIRE. 41 two larv;T', I think of this species, were accidentally "swept," and after a lengthy search I found another feeding on the blossom of a species of Crepia. Folia chi, P. fiarieincta. Cleoceris viiinnalis. — A $ was attracted into the house by light on August 8th ; the first time I have taken this species in the imaginal state. Cervjo matura, Xylophaaia lithoxylea, A'. mono■' < ^ y^v ^%^- . i A %Wv-. '^'\ i Photo. F. N. Clark, Peridea tkepida, stellate bodies of ancillary appendages. Fig. 1.— ? . Fig. 2.— :inners lump (they are not trained to see differences), but everyone •ends by splitting (small differences become easily noticed with experi- ence)." Anyway, Barrett evidently studied these Hydrcpcias in- sufficiently to make anything of them. In 1902, Dr. A. R. Wallace requested me to write for the new edition of Island Life a list of the various forms of the lepidoptera peculiar to our islands. The compilation worked out at so great a length, that I at last eliminated only the most striking cases for Dr. Wallace's book, but published the whole list ,in the I^nt. Record, vol. xiv. Here, among other things, I note (pp. 116-117) the Hydroecias, and of Ji. paludis I write, " A quite distinct species, Ixit closely allied to H. nictitans, chiefly confined to coast districts of the south-east of England," etc. Then Mr. Studd and the Rev. E. C. Dobree-Fox {Ent. Rcc., xvi., p. 107) write on H. paludis, and point out its distinctness, and I note {op. rit., xvii., p. 305) on its abundance on the saltmarshes of the Medway in 1905, Mr. Ovenden doing the same {op. cit., xviii., p. 18), whilst the sale of some fine ones at Stevens' in Mr. G. F. Mathew's collection, is chronicled {op. cit., p. 330). Then, in 1907, Mr. South {Moths British Isles, i., p. 284), without even mentioning lucens, sinks paludis as a form of H. nictitans, in the following authoritative sentence: " Specimens found in marshes, •especially those by the sea, are usually somewhat larger than normal, but I cannot see that they otherwise differ from forms of H. nictitans." H. paludis, therefore, after all our careful study and attention, and in spite of the fact that it would apparently breed true — at an}' rate, larvae obtained in certain districts produced nothing else — was ultimately settled as being undifferentiable from il. nictitans. Here was a state of bliss which personally I hoped would last for ever. But Mr. F. N. Pierce was, whilst Mr. South \vas publishing this welcome conclusion, microscopically examining and photographing the S ancillarj' appendages of the Noctuids for his forthcoming book on the subject, and the Rev. C. R. N. Burrows was busy helping with the same work. The latter gentleman, when he came to deal with the Hydroecias, started to worry me to name specimens, and it was in vain that I told him that, whatever little I had once known about them was dissipated in the clouds of the past, and that the more recent authorities, who had dropped them, would be able to give all their reasons, because still fresh in mind, for ignoring what had been written in 1888 and 1891. A further plea that I had other work on hand was useless, and I had to name Hydroecias, and determine nictitans, lucens, and paludis, at sight, as in the days of my roseate but past 5'outh, and as if these had not been sunk because there were no differences by which they could be separated. Then came the wonder- ful discovery — the genitalia proved that Hj/droecia nictitans, H. lucens, and II. paludis, were distinct species, widely distinct ; and I was cynical enough to retort that I knew that 20 years ago ; that I had described {Brit. Xoct. and their Varieties, vol. i., pp. 58-64) six clearly distinct aberrations of H. nictitans, four of IJ. lucens, and three (almost racial) of H. paludis. I further spitefully added, that no collector who could distinguish Catocala nupta (the red undervving) from Triphaena pronnha (the yellow underwing), could fail to distin- guish IJi/droecia nictitans and //. paludis, even if he came a cropper over //. lucens. What 1 was told about my amazing cleverness by my 56 THE entomologist's record. reverend friend, had better be left unsaid, but it is necessary to take the entomological public thus far into confidence to lead up to what follows. Whilst examining the genitalia of these species, Mr. Burrows came across a form that, in its ancillary appendages, could not possibly be either of the three above species. Specimens were submitted to me, and on every occasion, without hesitation, I referred them to H. Incem^. The appendages showed that they could not be this species, and, finally, I was begged to find some distinguishing imaginal character by means of which this last-mentioned insect could be discriminated from its congeners ; the specimens were exhibited at the meetings of almost all the larger entomological societies in the country, in the hope that some lynx-eyed discoverer would spot a difference, but without success, and, after referring to the unnamed insect in a " Current Note " (E)it. Recnrd, xx., p. 146), as crinanemk, I advised Mr. Burrows to con- firm the name he, or Mr. Pierce, had suggested on its genitalic characters. This he did {op. cit., xx., p. 184), describing it as crinanensis, and finally, in 1909, Mr. Pierce published his work The Genitalia of the Noctiiidae, differentially describing (pp. 34-35) the ', and pup* of luccns and crinanennia are more easily separable by obvious characters of structure or habit than are the imagines. The South=eastern Pyrenees in early June. By a. S. TETLEY, M.A., F.E.S. At the beginning of last June I spent a week in the upper valley of the Aude in the Eastern Pyrenees, and, as the district seems to have been very little visited by the entomologist, it ma_y be as w'ell to set on record some of the more interesting lepidoptera observed. Our head- quarters were Axat, a small place of some five or six hundred inhabi- tants, its one street running close to, and parallel with, the river, and surrounded by low bare hills with forest-clad mountains in the back- ground. It can be easily reached by rail from Carcassonne by Quillan, and from it a good road runs to Mont Louis, and so over the frontier into Spain. Limestone is the prevailing formation in the neighbour- 58 THE ENTOMOLOGIST S EECORD. hood, though as you climb the mountains the jagged granite peaks thrust their heads above the overlying sedimentary rocks. Good accommodation is to be had at the Hotel Labat, and though our week was sadly marred by rain, I feel sure from what we saw of the country that its fauna and flora would prove as varied and interesting as those of the much better known district around Vernet. North and south of Axat the road runs through two superb defiles. The latter, known as the Defile of St. George, is about a mile from Axat, and the narrow valley beyond it was by far the best hunting ground we investigated. The road runs south for 15 miles from Axat to the Baths of Escouloubres (2300ft.), with steep pine-covered mountains on either hand, and everywhere along the roadside and in the little gullies that ran up the cliffs, we found butterflies in abun- dance. The most generally-distributed butterfly was Melitaea deione, May 30th to June 4th. It was evidently past its prime, and, though it looked fresh enough on the wing, we found that hardly one in four or five was worth keeping. Mr. Lowe (aittea, p. 10) pronounces the form as indistinguishable from that taken by him at La Grave last summer. In the males the ground colour is very uniform, though in most the third row of the brown spots (counting from the hind margin) is just perceptibly lighter than the others. The females, as might be expected, were much more variegated ; in one the outer row of lunules on the hindwings is very pale straw colour, and the black markings are coarse and heavy. The most conspicuous, if not the commonest, butterfly was Ki(chloe etip/wnoiilefi, in splendid order, the- females obviously not fully out, as we found plenty- of them a week later at Vernet. In the males the red apical blotch was heavily marked with black on the inner edge ; the black tip in the females much suffused with orange. Both sexes were large fine insects, some as large as 45mm. in expanse. Wherever the Bisnitella grew, one was sure to find /'-'. euphenoidea and its ova, and one dull showery after- noon we boxed quite a number of the butterflies from the yellow- flowers they mimic so wonderfully. Iphidides podalirius gen. xevn.mieau, the spring brood of var. feisthcunelii, flew everywhere, even up and down the village street to the vast excitement of the petits garcons.- Aporia cratae//i, Leptosia sinapu, and Aciriaden tlietis complete the list of really abundant butterflies. In one field just beyond the St. George defile, Mditaea aurinia was common though passe. A few specimens seemed to be var. provinrialis. Here and there one picked up il/. dictj/nna var. vernetensis, a form almost as bright as typical M. athalia. It occurred a little more frequently a week later at Vernet.. M. athalia was hardly out, odd specimens only being observed. Single examples were taken of Loaeia alciphwii var. (pirdiua S and Pnntia daplidice ^ . Two days devoted to the exploration of the big forests to the east of Axat proved very disa|3pointing to the entomologists of the party .. Butterflies were almost entirely absent, both from the meadows at the foot of the mountains and in the open sunny glades among the trees. Pararge egeria occurred sparingly, typical or nearlj^ so, bat very little else. The doctor, who wielded a net with great enthusiasm and success, brought back a single worn specimen of Brenthis dia from the Foret des Fanges. Rondou gives it as uncommon in the Pyrenees. The bare and stony slopes close to the town, covered with cistus and THE SOUTH-EASTERN PYRENEES IN EARLY JUNE. 59 various aromatic plants, were likewise very barren of insect life. Everes alcetas occurred freely in one place close to the high road to Rivesaltes, and a few " Burnets " flew on one difficult slope ; Anthro- cera lavandulae and A. trifolii were caught and identified. On June 5th we left Axat for Vernet. Taking train to the next station east, we walked over the mountains in a south-easterly direc- tion to Molitg, and so to Vernet. A glorious morning gave way about eleven to clouds and mist, and the whole of the tramp across the watershed between the valleys of the Aude and the Tet was spent in heavy rain. The highest point reached was about 4000 feet, and we had hoped much from our journey over this terra incognita. We lost our bearings on the top, a boggy, treeless plateau, had an adventure with a Pyrenean bull, which warmed our damp half-frozen limbs, and finally got down late in the day to Molitg, a spa on the little Castillane River some five or six kilometres north-west of Prades. Molitg would, I tbink, well repay a prolonged visit. Behind it lies an immense expanse of wild mountainous countrj^ while in front the ground slopes southwards down to the valley of the Tet, and is bathed in sunshine nearly all the day. The accommodation was by far the best we fell in with during our journeyings, and the price very reasonable. On the roadside below the hotels, I made my first acquaintance with Thais var. medesieaate, which seemed to turn up singly wherever the Aristolochia grew. A single specimen of ScoUtantides orion was taken, but to us Eptnep/tele pasiphae was even more interesting. It flew among the cistus bushes on the rubble slopes above the road, diving in and out of the stems close to the ground, a most provoking habit, which rendered it very hard to catch. All taken were males, and in the finest condi- tion. A dozen satisfied us, for we fully expected to find it at Vernet, but we never saw it again. Among other butterflies there occurred Melitaea deione, M. didi/ma, Plebeins aripis, and Kveres alcetas. A week at Vernet closed our short tour, a week of low temperatures and heavy rain. Vernet has been so much written of that I will not add thereto. Enough to say that Melitaea deione and Euchloe euphe- noides were equally common, M. didi/ma and M. cin.via only a little less so, while Aporia crataef/i swarmed in thousands. I noticed that red clover seemed to be far and away their favourite flower. At one place in the road above Casteil, I counted 42 A. rrataei/i sitting on a patch in the road small enough to be covered with a net, and 17 more on a smaller patch within a j'ard. I think M. deione and other butterflies found at both places were fresher at Vernet than at Axat, 1000 feet lower. ScoUtantides orion gen. vern. ornata was nearly over at Vernet, while Plehi'iiis arr/us referable to var. pj/renaica was only just out. The following is the complete list of butterflies seen or taken at Axat (May 30th to June 4th), Molitg (June 5th), Vernet (June 6th to 18th): — Erijiuiis alt/taeae, C alceae (\ ernet) , Hesperia cart/ianii,II. alvcns, H.serratnlae, H. jnalrae, Poirellia sao,Xisoniadt'S tai/es, Aiiiiiadea sijlraniis, TJujinelicKs /iavus, Loireia var. (p>rdiiis, L. dorilis, Itioiricia phlaeas, Ciipido ininiiiius, ('. osiris [sebrns) i'l/aniris seiniari/iis, Glaucopsyclw cyllarus, Aijriades t/tetis, Poli/onnnattis icarns,Aricia astrarc/ie (atjestis) , ScoUtantides orion (not at Axat), Plebeius arifus, Everes alcetas, Callop/irijs ruhi, Neineobiiis liicina, Iplticlides podalirins Yur. feistliainelii gen. vern. inieffii, Papilio niacliaon, Thais var. inedesicaste (not Axat), Parnassius apollo (Vernet), P. inneinosijne (Vernet), Aporia crataeyi, Pieris brassicae, P. 60 THE entomologist's record. rapae, P. napi, Pontia daplidice, Euchlo'e cardamines, E, euphenoides, Leptosia sinapis, Colias hyale, C. edusa, Gonepterijx rhamni, lasoria lathonia, Brpnthis eaplirosyne, B. dia, Melitaea aurinia, M. pJioebe, M. cinxia, M. didyma, M. deione, M. athalia, M. dictynna var. vernetensis, Pyrameis cardui, P. atalanta, Euvanessa antiopa, Vanessa to, Aylais urticae, Eugonia polyckloros (larvffi), Polyyonia c-album, Lmenitis Camilla, Pararye maera, P. megaera, P. egeria, Epinepliele jiirthia and var. hispidla, E. pasiphae (Molitg), Coenonympha arcania (Vernet), C. pamphilus, Erehia evias. The few Heterocera noted included Diacrisia sanio, Macrothylacia rubi, a big J at light at Vernet, Plusia gauima, Ophiodes lunaris, Enclidia mi 3ind E. glyphica, Acontia liictnosa, Venilia maculata, Strenia clathrata, Eidonia conspicuata, and the Anthrocerids mentioned above. I might add that Brenthis selene occurs at Escouloubres, as I have specimens taken there in 1908 by my friend James Backhouse, the well-known ornithologist. The flowers between Axat and Escouloubres, and beyond the latter place to Querigut, were wonderful in their beauty and abundance. Specially noteworthy were the large sulphur-coloured Antirrhinum and purple Alpine Aqiiilegia, and at Querigut wide expanses of white narcissi, reminding one of the hillsides at les Avants in May, 1907. Agriades coridon var. constant!, generatio praecox. By Dr. J. L. REVEKDIN. At the beginning of April, 1906, I found myself on the shore of the Bay of Cavalaire, in the department of Var, and was much surprised to see on the wing a Lycyenid, which was evidently neither Volyom- matus icarus nor Celastrina argiolus ; I captured a ^ , and for the first instant did not know with what species I had to deal, but, on exami- nation, recognised at once that it was Agriades coridon. This A. coridon was so different from the type that we have in Switzerland, whether in the plains or on the Alps, that my doubt was easily explained, the date of my capture, April 6th, being also very surprising, since with us this species makes its first appearance in the first days of July. In 1906 and 1908 I took in the same locality, at Pardigon, a series of 120 specimens, of which 15 are 2 s. Monsieur Charles Oberthiir, to whom I showed them, informed me that this very special form of A. coridon was not unknown to him, since he had formerly examined a long series of ^. coridon exactly similar, taken by Alexandre Constant at St. Tropez, a small town on the coast of Var, about twelve kilometres from Pardigon. He told me that Constant had intended to describe and name this form, but had unfortunately died before doing so. M. Oberthiir has strongly urged me to study and describe this variety myself. It is, in fact, in my opinion, a special variety, which, if my information is correct, inhabits the littoral of Var; it is probably the form which Mr. Wheeler found not far from Pardigon, between Cavalaire and le Canadel {Ent. Bee, 1909, p. 186), on May 6th ; and which, as M. Oberthiir informs me by letter, Mr. Powell has taken in the Foret du Dom (Var). At Pardigon, this butterfly flies either on the shore, or by the side of the rail- way that mounts towards the station of La Croix, at a short distance from the shore. In the spring of 1906 and 1908 I took it from AGRIADES CORIDON VAR. CONSTANTI. 61 April 6kh to the day of my departure, the 19th, and, at this latter date, this spring brood was probably not yet nearing its end, as the specimens were still very fresh. As to the 5 s, I only took one specimen in 190G, on April 6th, and it was worn, the rest were taken between April 11th and 19th, 1908. The following are the distinctive characters of this variety ; these characters are remarkably constant, judging at any rate, by my series : Upperside : General ground tint less vivid and brilliant than in typical A. coridon, this tint is slightly greyish ; if one places side by side two series of A. coridon, the one of the ordinary form, the second of those from Pardigon, those of the latter appear noticeably duller and more greyish. The forewing generally shows a small black line, more or less well-marked, at the extremity of the discoidal cell ; the grey marginal border is broad, and often shows a series of dirty white lunules in its centre. The hindwing is ornamented along its outer margin with eye-spots, which are generally complete, i.e., formed by a large black point surrounded by a whitish ring, which is whiter in the part border- ing the black point externally, and is generally blackish-grey internally. Under- side: The ground colour, instead of being whitish as in the type, is grey, and of a very marked grey, scarcely at all browner on the hindwings, whilst in the type the two wings differ much from one another as a rule, the hindwing being yellowish, the fo.ewing whitish. The margin of all the wings presents a complete series of black points encircled by white, these eye-spots are on the hindwings surmounted by orange lunules, bordered in turn internally with little black chevrons ; on the fore wings the eye-spots are edged internally with chevrons of a dark grey, which sometimes form a continuous blackish band. All the spots on the underside of both wings are very large. These characters are, apart from the dull tint of the upperside and the dark grey colouring of the underside, similar to those of var. rezniceki, Bartel, which is distinguished by the discoidal mark of the forewings and the large size of the eye-spots on the hindwings above, and the large spotting beneath ; but while rezniceki is whiter beneath than the type, the variety of Var is much greyer. The eye-spots on the upperside of the hindwings are often in the 3 edged internally with a little fulvous (ab. suavis, Schultz) ; I do not know if this form of aberration occurs in rezniceki. The variety which 1 have just described shows a tendency to the increase of the black pigment, and the presence on the underside of the li)i()sn>i had been established, partly in the beams in the cellar, and partly in an old stump in a hedge about 30 yards from the house. This nest had been in existence, to my knowledge, for ten years, but it was not until August, 1898, that I attempted to dig out the part of the nest that was in the hedge, and place it under observation. I succeeded in obtaining a large number of ants, pupae, and larvse, which I settled in a " Lubbock formicarium," allowing the ants to roam over two tables connected by a stick. The result of my excavations was to drive the ants to settle entirely in the beams of the house, where they were completely inaccessible. They travelled in search of aphides all over the grounds, and had regular tracks all round the house and garden. Their means of egress from the cellar was through three or four small holes in the angle formed by the wall of the house and the flagstones along the sides of the house. On several occasions in the spring of 1898, I had noticed odd specimens of a yellow ant walking about on the flagstones, and had supposed them to be L. r^arus, as the lawn below abounded with nests of that ant, though it is rare that L. fiavus ^ s leave their nests to go any distance. One peculiarity about these ants was their large size and brilliant colour, which leads one now to think that they were L. umbratus and not L. jlants. I had established my artificial nest of L. fnliyinosus in a small room detatched from the house, about six yards from the entrance to the nest in the cellar. Previously to my digging up the nest in the hedge, the ants used to skirt the outer wall of this room on their way between the two nests. I took my nest on August 20th, and the next day found that the ants had changed their pathway, and were now coming through the inside of the room along the wall. On the night of August 25th I was watching the stream of ants with a lantern, and saw one of the large L. uuibratus ^ s among the L. fuliijinosus. I watched her salute two [.. fuliyinostis, who took 68 THE entomologist's record. little notice of her. She greeted some others, one of whom made as if to attack her. I thereupon took up this L. nwbratns ^ and put her into my artificial nest. She was at once seized by an antenna, but released almost immediately. Several ants threatened, but did not attack her. Shortly after a large L. fiilu/ijwsus dragged her out of the nest. Immediately after being released, she ran back into the nest. At 5.0 a.m. next morning she was dead, and an ant was carrying her about the nest. On August 26th I found another />. Hmbratits coming out of one of the holes in the wall used by the L. fttlijiinnsus. I put her in my nest at 11.35 a.m. She entered readily, saluting all the ants she met, though they seemed to threaten her. At 12.10 p.m. a L. fuliginosus was cleaning her, and at 12.13 p.m. another was feeding her. At 12.20 p.m. a L. fulif/inosns was holding her by an antenna. At 12.30 p.m. I found another large L. iiiubratus and a Mtjrwica scabrinndis, among the L. ftdu/inosits. I put them both in the nest. The former behaved like the previous one, but the iV. scahrinodis ran away from every ant she met, and hid in a corner, eventually escaping from the nest. The first L. lonbratus was still held by an antenna. I then went out and found two more L. nmbratiis ^ s on the flagstones, and put them in the nest. They saluted the L. fiilif/ifwaiis, who this time returned the salute by rapid jerks of the body. There were now four in the nest, none being attacked, the one held by an antenna having been released. Presently one came out and crossed from one table to the other on the stick connecting the two, just as numbers of L. fiiliffinosHs were doing. I watched this ant cross and return, going straight back to the nest. I then took two L. faviis ^ s from a nest in the garden, and put them in my nest. The larger one soon found her way out without having encountered any ants, but the smaller one encountered some L. fuUijinosm, and was at once killed. I then put a L. }d(ier in the nest. She was at once chased throughout the whole nest, but her greater speed enabled her to escape. At 1.35 p.m. three L. mubratiis were in the nest unmolested. At 2.30 p.m. two were un- molested, the third being held by a leg. At 4.10 p.m. all three were untouched, the fourth was not in the nest. At 5.0 p.m. all well, one being fed by a L. ftilifihwsus. At 7.2 p.m. two were in the nest unhurt. At 7.20 p.m. I saw a L. unibratns just entering the nest carrying a L. fiili(/inos)is larva (the L. fidif/inosKs used occasionally to carry larvfe across to the other table and back again). Just inside the nest she met a L.fidif/inosns, who took the larva from her. The L. xnibratus then turned round and crossed the stick to the other table again. No others were inside the nest, but I could see no dead ones anywhere. Next day, August 27th, at 10.45 a.m., one was in the nest. At 12.0 noon two were in the nest. At 1.45 p.m. ditto. At 3.28 p.m. ditto. One was moving the L. //(Z/V/Mio.s^s larvae about. At 6.10 p.m. still two inside. One was being fed by a L. fulif/inosKs. August 28th, at 9.30 a.m. one was in the nest, no others being visible. At 10.40 a.m. two in the nest, one occupied in plastering earth against one side of the frame. At 2.0 p.m. two in nest. At 10.0 p.m. ditto. August 29th, at 10.0 a.m. two inside nest. At 3.30 p.m. ditto. One was feeding the larv*. At 5.45 p.m. one inside being fed, another out on the table. When I disturbed the nest the former helped the L. fuliijinosus to move the larva?. August 30th, I could see no L. umbratu^ WING MEASUREMENTS OF LEPIDOPTERA. 69 anywhere, but there were no dead ones to be found. I put a Formica riifa in the nest. They attacked and chased her out. September 1st, at 10.0 a.m. I found two more L. uwbratns on the flags, and put them in the nest. The first /.. fiili;iinosi(^ they met greeted them as friends. At 10.80 p.m. both at home in nest. At 11.0 a.m. one inside, the other not visible. At 11.30 a.m. both inside. At 2.0 p.m. ditto. I visited the nest at 4.0 p.m., 5.0 p.m., and 6.30 p.m., and found both all right, one helping to clean the larvce. September 2nd, at 9.30 a.m. one was dead, but showed no signs of having been damaged. The other one was all right. At 7.0 p.m. the remaining ant all right. They had removed the dead one. September 3rd, at 10.0 a.m. the ant still in nest, quite at home. September 4th, ditto, at 9.50 a.m., 1.5 p.m., and 6.30 p.m. September 5th. at 10.45 a.m., the L. uiiibratita was dead, though apparently uninjured. I was unable to continue these experiments from this date. About one ant in eight in this nest of Lasius fulir/inosus carried an AntemiophoniR-'. Some had white parasites located on the back of the thorax. There was also a number of small red spider-like mites which ran about among the larva^, and some larger parasites, about the size of an Antennophnrux, among the larvae, sometimes on a larva, but not attached to it. Wing Measurements of Lepidoptera. By .T. W. TUTT, F.E.S. I have recently been much interested, and not a little disturbed, by my inability to make the measurements (wing expanse) sent to me by some of my esteemed continental correspondents tally with others of the same species, which I myself supposed were accurate for the same districts, in some of which I had worked. A little enquiry soon elicited the fact that measurements cf wing-expanse are generally made by continental lepidopterists not from the centre of thorax to the wing-apex on either side (or from the centre of thorax to one wing-apex x 2) as in this country, but across an imaginary line drawn in front of the set insect from the apex of one forewing to that of the other. This, of course, not only cannot give the real expanse of the insect, but it is sometimes so much less than the real expanse that one forms an entirely erroneous idea of the size altogether. In some specimens of of A. coridon in question, in which the real wing-expanse amounted to 38mm. -40mm., the measurements from wing-apex to wing-apex was fully 6mm. less when measured across in continental fashion. Another matter has discovered itself. It appears that some of our own collectors, in giving information re insects set to shovr the under- sides, speak of the wings as left or right exactly as they appear in the underside insect. Of course, set to exhibit the underside, the true right wings are on the left side of the pin and rice versa, but they remain the true right and left wings nevertheless, and should be so called. Great muddle might otherwise occur (possibly has already * The species would be Antennophorus grandis, Berl. It was described by Berlese in 1903 {Rcdia, i., 1903, p. 392). I took it at Wellington College, in 1006, with its host, Lasiux fulii/iiui.oi^, and have since found it with the same ant in various localities, and recorded it as new to Britain (Ent. Ecc, 1907, p. (i). It will be seen that Mr. Crawley observed it in 1898. — Horace Donisthorpk. 70 THK KNTOMOLOMST's RECORD. occurred). The right pair of wings, in Avhatever manner (underside or upperside) the insect may be set, must always be the pair on the right side of the insect when at rest alive, and in a natural position. These points are important to the writer just now, and he hopes that his continental correspondents will copy the facts of this note into their own magazines, so that some intelligible uniformity in these matters may result. E 0 P T E R A . QuEDiiTs NiGRoccKRULEUs, Rey. — -I have to record this interesting species from a fresh habitat — a wasp's nest. The nest was unearthed on Ditchling Beacon, Sussex, September 12th, 1909. Besides the Quediuii, of which I took one 3 specimen, the nest yielded a few (_^niptnpha. sanlcyi, Pand., a CURRKNT NOTKS. 75 species new to the British list, the former being apparently a dung species. Besides moles' nests, Dr. Joy says that ho has taken O. saidn/i in flood refuse. Dr. Sharp states that Phaedun conchiini.s, Steph., is specitically distinct from P. annoraciae, whilst he separates the allied tiDin'dnlKs generically under the name Paraphaedon. Mr. E. R. Bankes adds Ceniiostonia snsinella, H.-Sch., to the British list from two specimens taken among its foodplant, aspen, at Aviemore, on June 17th and 19th, 1909. The species is double-brooded, the larvtB mining aspen leaves in July and again in September. Mr. Edward Saunders notes that Thomson has split the examples hitherto combined under the name Peiiipliredoii morio, Fab., into two species, both of which occur in Britain. These Thomson renames, neither being referred to morio, Fab., nor to ant/iracinits, Smith. The names given by Thomson are riypealis and mriiiatns, but it is clear the matter of names cannot end here. Mr. Saunders also adds J>iodontii>; frieaei, Kohl., to the British list, from examples taken at Oxshott and ? Woking, and Dnfoinea halistida, Nyl., from a ? taken on Woking heath. He also describes a new species FfalictKn arnoldi, near //. minntissimus, from specimens taken at Hellingly, near Eastbourne, August 14th, 1908. In August, 1868, the Rev. C. J. S. Bethune, M.A., D.C.S., F.R.S.C, published the first number of the Canadian fjUtoniolonist. Since then 41 volumes have been published, of which Dr. Bethune has edited all but B {viz., vols, vi-viii), which were produced under the editorship of Dr. Saunders. In his 72nd year, Dr. Bethune finds his eyesight failing, and his desire that a successor should be appointed has ended in the Executive of the Entomological Society of Ontario appointing him Editor Emeiitus of the journal, whilst Dr. E. M. Walker, Lecturer in Biology at the University of Toronto, has accepted the position of General Editor. It would be impossible to find any- one who has done more for Canadian entomology than the hard- working entomologist who has so well-earned his retirement. It is with the greatest possible regret that we have to note the death of Edward Saunders at the age of 61, on February 6th. Twenty-five years ago when we first joined the elect as represented by the Entom. Society of London, one of the most interesting personalities in the Society was Edward Saunders. Ever since, he has been, as far as his unsatisfactory health would allow, an active supporter of the Society, serving ofhcially as Vice-President, Treasurer, and Member of Council, whilst, at the time of his decease, he was a member of the ]>usiness and Publication Committee of the Society. He would more than once have been unanimously elected to the Presidency had he allowed his name to have been brought forward but he always refused on the ground of ill-health. He was first and foremost an excellent hemipterist and hymenopterist. His standard works on these orders are known to all, and need no commendation from us ; they are sound and trustworthy, and no one, perhaps, had a better grip of, or did more to elucidate our knowledge of, the British species than himself, and he was particularly well-informed in the work of the authorities on these orders. His books contain fewer mistakes, perhaps, than those of most authors who have dealt with the less exploited orders. He was also a good coleopterist, and we believe 76 THE ENTOMOIjOGISt's RECORD. began his entomological work as a student of this order. He was made a Fellow of the Eoyal Society in 1902, an honour nowadays rarely conferred on an entomologist, owing to there being so much competition for the few available Fellowships each year among those whose pro- fessional work lies in other branches of scicence — especially applied science. An excellent obituary notice (and photograph) is to be found in the Ent. Mo. Mai/azine, on the editorial staff of which he has been since 1880. Mr. C. 0. Waterhouse was elected unanimously to the vacancy on the Business and Publication Committee of the Entomological Society of London at the meeting of the Council held on March 2nd, in the place of Mr. Edward Saunders, deceased. We regret to hear also, after a long and painful illness, of the death of Harry McArthur, a professional collector of great acumen, exceedingly well-informed, but of most modest and retiring disposition. His decease took place on February 8th. He was 64 years of age. We hear that Mr. T. Bainbrigge-Fletcher has been appointed an assistant at the Pusa Agricultural College, by the Indian Govern- ment, and left for Calcutta about the commencement of March. There must be unlimited opportunities for scientific entomological work in India, and one expects great things from this appointment. There have been many lepidopterists at work in India, but Mr. Fletcher's well-known preference for certain groups of the micro-lepidoptera, and his keenness in field observation, leads one to feel satisfied that, in these directions, many new discoveries will be made in the immediate future. At a Congregation held at Cambridge University, on February 17th, the Vice-Chancellor (Dr. Mason, Master of Pembroke) presiding. Pro- fessor W. Bateson (St. John's), the Hon. N. C. Rothschild (Trinity), and Mr. H. Scott (Trinity) Avere appointed to represent the university at the International Congress of Entomology to be held at Brussels in Aueust. SOCIETIES. The Lancashire and Cheshire Entomological Society. — January nth, 1910. — Mendel's theory of Inheritance.^ — Mr. C. F. Walker, M.A., by means of some excellent lantern slides, gave a very lucid and interesting account of Mendel's discovery, and also adverted to the recent work which has been done by numerous investigators. Mr. Walker mentioned the experiments of Messrs. Prout and Bacot with AcidaUa viiiiidaria, instancing it as a case of " Blended Inheritance," in which the Mendelian principle did not appear to apply. HYDEfficiA cRiNANENsis IN England AND Ireland. — Mr. F. N. Pierce exhibited a female specimen of Hydroecia rrinanejiais captured at Bolton, Lanes., in 1897, by Mr. J.' E. R. Allen. This is the first record for England. Mr. Allen has also recorded the species from Enniskillen, Ireland. The South London Entomological and Natural History Society. — January 21tJt, 1910. — Autumn Lepidoptera. — Mr. Tonge and Mr. Colthrup exhibited long series of Hybernia aurantiaria, H. defoliaria, and Hlmera pennaria, taken in the New Forest, November 17th-19th, 1909, where they were abundant in spite of the weather being clear and frosty. Mr. Colthrup exhibited a Gonepfery.r rliamm, found at the same time hybernating among holly. THE LEPIDOPTERA OF THE STAEFA BOGS IN 1909. 77 The Lepidoptera of the Staefa Bogs in 1909. By J. W. TUTT, F.E.S. The Lake of Ziirich sparkled gloriously, and Sfcaefa was bathed in brilliant sunshine when we arrived there on July 23rd, 1909, to pay another visit to Mr. Muschamp, and Avith the idea of picking up some thi'eads that we had lost all too soon the previous year when exploring the bogs among the hills at the back of Staefa. These bogs were so •entirely new to us as a collecting ground that one feels one could never get tired of them, and we still feel that we would like to spend some considerable time studying the micros which abound there, and which we unfortunate!}^ had no time even superficially to sample. The work we are engaged on, the life-histories and habits of our butterflies, demand all our attention, and more than all our leisure, and one has to keep one's nose very closely to the grindstone, both in and out of holiday season, to get ahead with what seems a never- ending entomological task. This will be considered, perhaps, only a lazy excuse by our micro-lepidopterists who might reasonably expect one to give them at least some material and some details from so prolific a spot, as a contribution towards their special work. We have already described the bogs of Staefa, their numerous springs welling out from the hillside, and the pine-woods that back them up on the side nearest the lake and Staefa, and there is no need to add to what we have already said as to the beautiful outlook as one climbs up behind the town into the fields and looks across the lake to the mountains on its southern side. The morning of the 24th was perfect, as we wended our way towards the bogs again, with memories, however, that would not be silenced, that had recently come from ■other visitors to Switzerland, to the effect that the weather had been atrocious in Switzerland right into July, that storm and cold had been the order of the day, that insects were amazingly backward and scarce, and that one need not expect to get much in the usual well- provided haunts this season ; Mr. Muschamp had also reported unfavourably, and so our spirits were not unduly elated at expected success. That the season was later and altogether less prolific than the preceding year was evident. The large numbers of common species observed in the town itself, in 1908 were altogether wanting, scarcely any Pierids, and no sign of Coliads or Vanessids. Enodia hi/pt'ranthus and Kpinephele ianira were only just emerging, and the former was apparently especially well-spotted on the underside, with, occasionally, the spots tending to a slightly elongated pear-shape (ab. cloiKjata, □. ab.) suggesting the more highly developed form ab. lanceolata, Frohawk, whilst a very bright brown form of the underside (ab. brunnea) appeared to us unusual. Aiifiiades sj/lvanus and Adopaea jiava were still abundant and not worn to shreds as they were in 1908, and a beautiful •example of Papilio mackaon proved quite worth the time spent in care- fully stalking it. f.cptosia sinapis now and again fluttered along in its leisurely manner, but the summer brood was evidently not fully out, whilst an occasional Loiccia dorilis only made up for its comparative abundance of the preceding year. Turning into the open wood just before the bogs were reached, Melanariiia (jalatea was frequent, as it had been by the roadside just previously ; so also was I'ieris napi, and April 15th, 1910. 78 THE entomologist's recokd. one was not altogether surprised to find Dryas paphia and Argynnis adippe getting somewhat passe, whilst an overhead stroke at a specimen not clearly determined as it flew swiftly past, settled the insect for a newly-emerged Euynnia polycJdoros. On the thistle-flowers were some freshly-emerged Anthrocera trifolii and A. filipeudulae, the former wanderers from the adjacent bog, and Gonepteryx rhanmi occurred frequently, though in nothing like the abundance of the preceding year. Over the bushes a fresh brood of Celastrina argiolua was on the wing, only 3 s, however, were netted, and there was a suspicion that these were rather obsoletely spotted on the underside of the forewings. Turning into a piece of bog enclosed in the wood, the first somewhat unexpected capture was CalUnwrpha dominula, several of which were observed on the thistle-flowers. A few eggs were obtained, the larvfe of which have fed steadily ahead, chiefly on roses,, and not one of which died until a few days since (February 20th, 1910), when the more forward ones moulted apparently into their last skin, and a serious mortality set in. A number of Bntys hyalinalis were disturbed from among the undergrowth, whilst just at the entrance a small bright form of Coenonyiuplia arcania, in fine condition, was not uncommon, yet so localised, that all the specimens observed must have been within an area of about 20 yards square ; Melanaryia yalatea, too, was common on the edge of the bog, whilst Melitaea dictynna was frequent, and some examples still in really good trim. Occasionally a swifter-flying Anthrocerid crossed one's path, and one knew at once, now that one was alive to it, that it was Anthrocera viciae [meliloti). The habits of this species are quite different from those of A. trifolii. It is altogether more alert and more active than its congener, and, even when resting on its favourite flowers, is not by any means to be picked ofl' with the fingers as is the case with most species of the genus; it flies most freely in the early afternoon but the net may be wanted for its capture at all times of the day. Soon the first Coenonympha tiphon appeared, although the species Avas by no means common here, and the chance disturbance of a To.vocanipa pastinioit soon prompted us to a hunt sufficiently successful to show the species was common, whilst a similar chance capture of Hydrelia mica also led to further investigation, and one was interested in finding these two species together as in our homeland fen at Chippenham. A few Coenonympha pamphilus were noted and a few large and rather worn Cyaniris semiarym, and then a start was made for the larger bog. Walk- ing through the open wood, it was noticed that a single Thymdicus acteon alone represented the dozens of the previous season, whilst Acidalia ochrata was an unexpected addition to the fauna. An occasional example of Adscita statices occurred as in the preceding year, altogether four were noted, all . ir«»«ia/m, were responsible for lots 226-228 reaching £1 2s. £1 10s. and £1 7s. respectively ; fifteen Eupoecilia Jiaviciliana for lot 237 producing £1 5s.; and E. manniana, SALE OF LEPIDOPTERA, 96 lot 238, 14s.; four Aniyrolepia schreibersiana, lot 241, £1 Is.; although Lozopera beatricella, twelve and seven, did not raise lots 242 and 244 above 10s. each. The Psychids produced very fair prices — ^14s., £1 6s., 5s., 7s., 13s., 9s., 12s., and £1 2s. per lot, whilst the Tineids {seiix. restr.) in some instances were also satisfactory. Among the Gelechiids, Gelechia (jibbosella, G. semidecandriella, (jr. Imaijiiaiella, G. hiibneri, and G. iiinctella, brought up their lots to 10s., 14s., 18s., lis., £2, and 10s. respectively. When will some of our young collectors rediscover some of these latter, now almost lost, species in Britain ? The Butalids and Glyphipterygids produced £2 17s. 6d., £2 2s., £1 4s., £1 12s. 6d., and 18s., 6s., and 5s. per lot, the sale on the 22nd producing altogether about £216. On February 23rd the first species offered was the series of Peronea rn'stana, on which was based the Mnnoiiraph of the species published in the Knt. Record, vol. xiii, together with the types of the new aberrations there described and figured. The whole series produced £40 14s., some of the examples commanding excellent prices, thus, single examples of tolana, 10s. each ; curthana, £2; masoniana, £1 Is. ; cliadottana, £3 and £3 5s. ; gumpiana, £1 Is., £2 2s. ; near tolana, £2, and so on. The series of P. hastiana, fetched £5 18s. 6d. We had intended working these out with the late J. A. Clark, as we had done /'. cristana, but like so many human intentions it never came off. We observe, however, that the whole series was bought h}^ Doncaster, we hope for one person, who will monograph them similarly to P. rn'stana some day. The rest of the Microlepidoptera produced, on the whole, high prices, particularly the Nepticulids, which went, in con- secutive lots, for £1 8s., £2 10s., £2, £1 12s. 6d., £2 5s., £2 10., 14s., 14s., £1 Is., £1 7s. 6d., £1 6s., and £2. The Alucitids one might have supposed would have sold for more. They only brought 7s., 12s., 6s., 7s., 7s., £1, and 10s. per lot. These were followed by a great number of valuable insects that had never been amalgamated with the collection. Among others, C/irijsoi>homiH dispar $ , £3 15s., 5 , £4 10s., £3 15s., £2 2s., $ (Grigg coll.), 18s., ) dark femora ; (S) the more conspicuous band of white scales on the suture ; (e) one white band on thorax only ; (f) penultimate joints of antennae more transverse. — Hereward C. Dollman, F.E.S., Hove House, Bedford Park. Synonymy of Apion gyllenhali, Kirby. — Apioti iinicolor, Kirby, must I think be sunk as a synonym of A. //yllenhali , Kirby. After careful inspection of the types in Kirby's collection in the British Museum (kindly placed at my disposal by Mr. C. J. Gahan), I am unable to see any differentia betwdten his species unicolor and his type of ijtjllenhali, other than may be attributed to differences of sex. The species standing in our collections under the name of unicolor, Kirby, must therefore be referred to the platalea of Germar ; the latter name is sunk by Fowler as a synonym of unicolor. — Id. Galerucella pusilla, Weise, at Lewes. — I have a few examples of this recent addition to our coleopterous fauna (due to Dr. David Sharp, ride Ent. Mo. Mag., February, 1910) captured at Lewes in August, 1906. The specimens I had in my cabinet as " cahuariensis " (?), and I owe it to Mr. W. E. Sharp (who also, I believe, has specimens from Lewes) that I have become aware of their true specific identity. —Id. Xantholinus glaber. Nor., in Richmond Park. — Although recorded from Richmond Park by Mr. G. C. Champion, I yet think that the capture of a specimen of A', ylaber on March 1st, of this year, is per- haps worth placing on recoid. I captured the specimen by breaking up a decayed bough of a standing oak. — Id. Gnorimus nobilis, L., in London. — I captured a specimen of this fine Cetoniid on the wing in my garden, Bedford Park, during late June. As a considerable part of this district was, in the past, devoted to fruitgrowing, 1 may, perchance, come across the head-quarters of this beautiful and rare beetle among the vestiges of the orchards that yet remain. — Id. SCIENTIFIC NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS. A suggestion as to some markings in lepidoptera.- — I have been breeding a few specimens of Callnphrys ruhi and L\ aria, and some of CURRENT NOTES. 97 these attracted my attention, as appearing to have on the underside, as well as the usual line of white markings, a faint white line along the discocellulars on both wings. On examining this line more care- fully, it was seen that there was no white line, but that the thickening of the vein caused the scales on its basal side to be raised up, and this, of course, in a continuous line across the wing for the length of the discocellular veins. This different angle at which the scales are set gave in some lights exactly the appearance of a white line. In de- scribing C. rubi, Tutt {A Nat. Hist. Ih: Lep., vol. ix., p. 90) notes some trace of a white median spot. I am not, however, desiring to improve the description of ('. rubi, but to suggest a question as to how far this structural condition, giving the appearance of a coloured line, may account for, or be in some way the starting point in, the evolution of the discal lines or spot that is so frequent a feature of butterfly and other lepidopterous markings. Or, rather, more clearly since the discocellular veins do in some way determine the existence of a discal spot, have we here some indication as to how its evolution begins ? — T. A. Chapman, M.D., F.E.S., Betula, Keigate. February 2Qth, 1910. URRENT NOTES. Dr. Sharp records {Eiit. Mn. Maf/.) the capture of Crepidodcra iitipressa, Fab., in Hayling Island, in September, 1909. It is probable that the species occurs along the western shores of France. The same coleopterist gives the opinion that Galerucella pusilla, Weise, captured at Mildenhall, Horning, and in the New Forest, is distinct from G. calainariemis, this differing from Bedel, who considers them specifically the same. Mr. J. R. Malloch adds two new species of Anthoini/iidae to the British fauna, viz., Fannia ni;fra, captured at Bonhill and Cardross in Dumbartonshire (founded on four ^ s taken between June and August), and Fannia feniorata, founded on a single niiiiatiii< (icartis), but the extremity has a special structure ; on its dorsal side it has a process bent into the lumen of the tube, that has on dorsal view a square end (see orhitulus), but on lateral view looks like a hook pro- jecting inwards from the dorsal margin. It seems, however, to be a thickening of the wall of the tube possibly straightened outward when the eversible membrane is exserted. Vacciniina {optilete) does not agree with any of the other genera very closely. It has a broad straight tube suddenly tapering at the zone. There are some doubtful species, for example, eHnijiilnH seems to be a riebeiits, but the }edo?agus is very short, and extremely so beyond the zone ; alcedo and Incifera seem to belong to a separate genus having unusually short and broad tedoeagi. CliiladcK has the jBdoeagus very like that of Aricia, but the clasps here mark it oft" distinctly, the serrated end being on a comparatively long neck. It may be noted that owjus has nothing to do with Cata- chri/wiis, but it is a Plebeiid belonging, or close to, Chilades. Referring to the examples of each genus given on page 154 (vol. x.), this classification by the structure of the a?d(ieagus alters the position of some of the species. I'si/lnrita is not an Aricia, but is much closer to, if not actually in, Poh/ouinuitiis : perseidtatta is not a (i/aniiis, but & riebeiiis : escheri \s not a ['(dynnnnatiis, but an Af/riades : Hirsxtina is indistinguishable from Ayriadcs : iiwleayer is a Polijo)ii»iatits. So far as my examination has gone, the great mass of Plebeiids belong to the genus Ayriades. It includes the following forms, of which I have not verified the correct naming of all examples, but I believe there are few, if any, errors — actis, avianda, aec/af/rus, armena, athis, celeatina, dai/iiiara, dania, damon, danione, eroides, erschoffi., esclteri, ylaitcias, Itopff'eri, hi/las, ipldgenia, iiicsopotauiica, inithridatiSy phyllides, pliyllis, poseidon, potithuiiiKS, siiperba. Under Polyounnatvs come amor, candalu^, celina {not = icarui<), eros, OBSERVATIONS ON THE HYBERNATION OF GONEPTERYX RHAMNI. 103 /i/iir.ii, martini, >iii'lfa;i('r, psi/lnrita, sorta, roiiix, and especially icariis, •with its many forms ariona, pcmica, icadiiis, etc., and one ov two other forms whose names I have not ascertained — nitilns and /njrcona appear to belong here rather than to I'lebeius. I'lebeiuR has onjitfi, ar;ii/}'o;/)ii)iii()U, zep/ii/nis, i-lcohia, p/icrcs, acwnu, inelisfta, perNep/iatta, aster (?), pylann, ercrsnianni, loireii. To Aririo I find no species unquestionably to belong except asfrarc/ic, eiiincchDi, iilas and ilomelii, but imiirica, In/acinthiix, fulla, and auteros, may do so, or may require a separate division or divisions. To Varciniina belong, as Avell as optiletc, ferf/ana and tor/toKta. As already noted, this is near to Ci/anirin, which has smmarijus, and to Lati pi/t/inaeiis, L., Monotonia conicicollis, Aub., M. fonnicetonoii, Th. All these ai-e new county records. — Id. ^E^ ARI AT ION. Note on Amblyptilia cosmodactyla, Hu. (acanthodactyla, Tr.), ab. NivEA, Bnks. — In the course of my notice of this beautiful aberration, in Ent. L'ec, xviii., p. 39 (1906), I stated that the two specimens, from which my description was made, were taken by Mr. W. Salvage, " probably in Sutherlandshire, though this is uncertain." At the 190 THE entomologist's RECORD. time of writing this, my firm belief was that, when I first saw the individuals some years previously, Mr, W. H. B. Fletcher told me that they had been taken in Sutherlandshire ; in the interval, however, the data had slipped his memory, and no note, throwing any further light on their history, could be found. Since then I have succeeded in discovering Mr. W. Salvage's address, and he has kindly searched his diaries in the hope of finding the desired details, but without success. He tells me, nevertheless, that the moths in question were undoubtedly taken at large, and that he feels almost certain that they were secured at Invershin, on the banks of the river Kyle, in Sutherlandshire. Mr. Salvage thinks that the year of capture was probably 1886, but it may have been 1892 or 1894. — Eustace R. Bankes, M.A., Norden, Corfe Castle. May 2iith, 1910. JS^OTES ON COLLECTING, Etc. Strange position of pupariuji of Hadena oleracea. — The follow- ing instance of an unusual pupal habitation seems to be so remarkable as to be worth recording. On August 19th last I was collecting pupae of Xoiuiiiria anoidinis {ti/jihae) in a reed bed, when I found a Noctuid larva on the point of pupating in the central stem of a reed, head upwards. The larva had spun a little thin silk round itself and was unrecognisable, but obviously not Nonagriid. It pupated on the way home. I preserved the pupa carefully, as I had no idea what species it would turn out to be. On June 13th of this year the moth emerged, and proved to be Hadena oleracea. The reed was in the middle of a large bed normally under water, which had been temporarily drained oft' for the purpose of my search. There was no other growth near, so to all appearances the larva had fed on this unusual pabulum. The reed beloAV it contained a large amount of frass, and there was no evidence that it had been tenanted by anj' other larva. — H. C. Hayward, Repton, Burton-on-Treut. June 15th, 1910. Diasemia ramburialis reported from Lings. — A request. — In the account of the sale of the remaining portion of the collection of lepi- doptera made by the late Mr. J. A. Clark in the Kntoniolof/ist's Record for April last, I notice that a specimen of l>iase)nia rambiirialis labelled "Lines, 1873," was sold in lot 158. As the Entomological Secretary for the Lincolnshire Naturalists' Union, I shall be very much obliged if the purchaser of this insect will communicate with me, and let me have any further particulars if he knows them, should this note come to his notice. — Guy W. Mason, Barton-on-Humber. Lepiduptera in Sussex. — The hot weather about mid- May brought things on. On May 22nd Brenthin selene was out in some numbers at Abbott's Wood and riliiia in the crevices of oak-trunks. — J. Alderson, 14, Daiibrne Road, Upper Tooting, S.W. Jinw 2n(l, 1910. Pachetra leucoph.ea, etc., in North Kent. — It appears to nie to be worth recording the capture of I'ailntya Ic'icnp/iaea at Haihng yesterday ; it was resting on the trunk of a beech-tree at the top of the downs. I saw very few butterflies, the most interesting were Cclas- tn'na cm/ioluK and Breut/iis t'lip/imsi/ite. — J. Ovenden, Frindsbury Road, Strood." June 9tli, 1910. SCIENTIFIC NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS. A Sexual Habit in Satyrus HEKiMioNE.--In August, 1909, in the Austrian Tirol I observed two specimens of Sati/nm hennionc, a rit. Noctuae etc., ii., p. 114. We did not know that we had been forestalled in the naming of this common British 5 form. The plates are really splendid, and any of our collectors of Noctuids who have not yet got a copy should write to Mr. Culot, Villa-les-Iris, Grand Pre, Geneve, for details. Our further congratulations to the Societe Lepidopterologique de Geneve on the publication of pt. 1 of the second volume of its Bulletin. So many of our British lepidopterists have to be considered Switzers CURRENT NOTES. 193 entomologically, that the publications of this active little society is just as interesting to us as to the members themselves. Indeed, for that increasing- army of British lepidopterists who do most of their collecting in the Alps of Central Europe, the BidUtin of the Geneva lepidopterists is as necessary as our own British magazines, and we would invite those who have not yet joined the Society, to put themselves into communication with that prince of Swiss entomologists, the editor of the liiilletiii, Prof. C. Blachier, 11, Tranchee de Rive, Geneva, or to the Honorary Life-President, to whom the foundation of the Society is due, and to whom the President in his address pays a high compliment, Mr. P. A. H. Muschamp, F.E.S., Staefa, Zurich, either of whom will be pleased to give every information as to membership. Of the contents of this part we cannot speak too highly. The energetic President, our valued correspondent and helper, Dr. .J. L. Reverdin, is responsible for three papers — " Li/caena corydon var. cnn^tanti,'" "Note on the ^ genital armature of some Pala^arctic Hesperiines," and " Aberrations of Lepidoptera." Professor Blachier is responsible for one paper, "New Varieties and Aberrations of Palcfarctic Lepidoptera." Mr. J. .Jullien writes on " Enterpia Iniideti, Rbr.," and Mr. C. Lacreuze, "Observations on the Hesperiines of Switzerland." The papers are illustrated by seven very fine and beautiful coloured and half-tone plates. The paper of greatest interest to collectors of European Rhopalocera is that of Dr. Reverdin on " The J' genital armature of the Hesperiines." The difficulty of separating the Hesperiines of the alreus group is well- known to every lepidopterist. Dr. Reverdin is able, by the J genital armature, to distinguish specifically H('fi])eria alrena, Hb., ti. cariinoe, Rbr., H. onopordi, Rbr., H. fritillnm, Rbr., and H. serrotidae, all of which, except the last, stand in almost all our collections as forms of H. alvetis. The spci/eri of Staudinger is considered an ab. of H. alveus and cirsii, Rbr., and iberica, Gr.-Gr., as abs. of H. catiinae. Mr. Lacreuze's well-illustrated paper on " The Hesperiines of Switzerland" may be looked upon as supplementary to Dr. Reverdin's, and with these two papers some considerable headway may be made in deter- mining the species found in the Alps of Central Europe. With pt. 1 of vol. ii of the Bulletin, the first part of the "Catalogue of the Lepidoptera of the Geneva district" (with map) is also published. This is an excellent list, well edited, and gives a first class idea of the extent of the fauna of this prolific district, including as it does part of Haute-Savoie and part of the Jura. The only objection we have to the list is the fact that, although the editors are, perhaps, better able than any other European lepidopterists to judge as to the validity of, and, therefore, give effect to their knowledge of, the natural genera into which the butterflies fall, yet, they have followed the often hopeless and absurd divisions, mis-called genera, of the Staudingerian Cataloi/ of 1901, many of which have been the butt of all advanced systematists ever since its issue. Do the editors really believe, in spite of all the detailed information to the contrary, that teliranutt belongs to the same genus fMiniddea as that in which hnetirns is placed (see A Xat. Hist. Brit. BiitterfUes, ii., p. 331), and where Bethune-Baker is quoted as saying that " Boetieua stands quite alone so far as Staudinger's genus is concerned, and is thft 194 THE entomologist's record. only representative of the Lampididi : the remainder are quite outside the tribe, and of these, telicanxs, Lang, and irebhianH>>, Brulle, belong to the genus Lam/ia'' [afterwards renamed (op. cit., p. 484) Rayivardia, LaiKjia, Moore, Pmc. Zool. Soc. Load., 1872, p. 567, being pre- occupied] ? Again, are the editors not satisfied that we have made out a case for Everes for anjiadea and alcetas, for Ciipido for iiiinitnus, Pleheius for ari/iis, arinjroiinomon, etc. [A Nat. Hutonj of the Briti^^h Butts., vol. iii.), and do they really think that these species belong to the same genus Lycaena containing avion and anas ! Then, again, are they satisfied (see Brit. Butts., ii., pp. 378-387, and iii., pp. 248-253) that Cyaniris is the right name for aryiolus ! We are disappointed that the Editors have not been con- vinced by the accumulation of facts we have brought together on the rsubject. On the other hand, if they are convinced, but follow a list (proved to be erroneous) merely for convenience, we would ask whether this will make for pulling the younger and eager lepidopterists up-to- date in their work? It is well known that Staudinger's genera were largely obtained haphazard from those who were at work at the time on the various groups, but one expects the genera in a list published by the ■Geneva entomologists to rest on some surer foundation than Staudin- ger's Vataloy. We hope the editors will forgive us this little howl, but we cannot believe that they believe the Everids of the world, the Plebeiids of the world, and the Polyommatids of the world should all be put into a hotch-potch miscalled Lycaena, a name belonging to the very separate and natural genus comprising avion, aveas,euplieunis, etc. Dr. Reverdin will no doubt check our work, by means of the genitalia of the "blues," and persuade his slower comrades that we are right and that there is no advance unless one goes ahead. We expect to take a long time to convince the mere collector that any change is just or right, we know we shall never convince him thai it is desirable, but we .are prepared to visit Geneva to prove to the elect there that our views are both right and sound on this matter. "Festina lente " may be a good motto, but however slowly we hasten, we must get ahead for all that and putting io, polyclilovos, antiopa in one genus Vanessa, tdicanus and boeticus in one genus Lampides, and avyiades, aryus, icavus, and ■avion in one genus Lycaena, is not hastening at all but going backwards. We hope that we shall have got beyond Staudinger's Cataloy for the Sphingids, Lachneids, Psychids, Noctuids, etc., when they come along. Our readers must not forget, however, that, in spite of this wail, it is a list to get, and the best of its kind ; we only want it better. j^OCIETIES. South London Entomological and Natural History Society. — May 12th, 1910. — Locality for Melit.ea aurinia gone. — Mr. Tonge ■exhibited a series of Melitaea auvinia taken at Verney Junction, about 1890, but apparently the species is now extinct there. Aberration of Asphalia flavicornis. — Mr. Ashdown, a specimen of Asphalia fiavicornis from Mickleham having a large dark blotch in the disc of the forewings. Parnassids. — Mr. Edwards, numerous species of the genus Parnassius, including l'. tvansiens, P. snrintheus, P. yracilis, P. imperator, etc. SOCIETIES. 195 Aberration of Phigalia pedaria. — Mr. Conlson, a very pale buflf ■example of Phif/alia pedaria from Epping Forest. Butterflies of Zermatt. — Mr. H. J. Turner, a number of species of Lepidoptera from Zermatt, and read a paper entitled " A few days with the Butterflies of Zermatt." June dth, 1910. — Aberration of Epione advenaria. — Captain Cardew, a short series of h!pione adiunian'a, inclnd- ing an unicolorous specimen from Godalming. Partial double-brooded- NESS IN Pieris napi. — Dr. Hodgson, the imagines bred from a brood ■of Pieris napi from ova laid in IMay, 1909. Some enaerged in July- August, 1909, but most of the insects did not appear till the spring of 1910. Amphidasys betularia ab. doubledayaria near London. — Mi'. Harrison reported the assembling of 21 < taken by him daring May last, at Tubney, Berkshire. Rare Hymenoptera. — The Rev. F, D. Morice showed a specimen of Clarelia pompiliformis, Luc, J ; the only fossorial wasp with pectinated antennae taken by him this spring at Oran, Algeria ; also examples of the saw-fly, Pliymatocera aterriina, Klug, with photographs of the insect in the act of ovipositing ■on " Solomon Seal," and gave an account of the way in which the saws are employed for the purpose. Instead of cutting vertically, the saws are turned sideways, a characteristic method employed, said Mr. F. Enock, by many of the Homoptera. Mr. A. Sich mentioned that some years since many larvie, which appeared identical with those of P. aterriina exhibited, occurred on the same plant in his garden at Chiswick. Glow-worm pupa. — Mr. H. Main brought for exhibition an empty larva skin of a cj Larnpi/ris noctilnea with a living pupa, which was seen to be intermittently luminous. Melanism ok Ematurga atomaria. — Mr. L. Newman showed a case containing a long and varied series of Hinatiiri/a atomaria bred from a melanic 2 taken in cop. with a dark typical J at Bury, Lancashire. It was noticeable that melanic and semi-melanic forms of the offspring predominated. Hybrid Lycenid.e. — Mr. Nev/man also exhil)ited a S and ? supposed to be hybrid A}je hastata was first seen, two specimens being captured flying in the sunshine about midday, and others were seen on the wing on June 8th. Amongst the species beaten out were Lithosia sororcula, Venilia macidaria, lodis lactearia, Asthena candidata, Cabera j)usaria, Ba/ita teiiierata, B. himacidata, Nttmeria pidierana, Loinaspilis iiianjinata, Larentia viridaria, Melanippe nociata, Coremia unidentaria, (J. ferrnyata, Camptonramma hilineata, Cidaria corijlata, C. trunrata, Pechypotfon barbalis, Boti/s hi/alinalu, and Emiijchia nrtnmacidata. Boarmia consortaria and Tephmsia luridata were picked ott" oak-trunks, and, on a lateral branch of oak, a single freshly-emerged ? Drijuirmia triiiianda idndonea) was found at rest. Along the railway banks between Folegate and Hampden Park, Heliaca tcnebrata was fairly common on May 21st, and a 2 Spilowma mcndica taken here on the same date, had by the 27th laid about 150 ova, the larvae from which fed up quickly and well, producing a nice lot of pupae. On the tops of the freshly-trimmed hawthorn hedges bordering the railway, the larvae of Lasiocanijut qiieiriisweve sunning themselves in some numbers, and those of Coamotriche potatnria were frequently noticed on the grass and herbage at the foot of the same hedges. Here, also, were found on blackthorn, three larvse of Kiitricha quercifolia. On June 5th, the oak-trees at Abbot's Wood were beaten for larvre of Bithys qiiercus, which were found to be fairly common, and quite fuUfed. A few larvae of Poecilocampa popiili and HylopJdla bicolnrana were also beaten out amongst a host of commoner species. No systematic work was done in connection with larva-hunting or beating, but, in addition to the species already mentioned, other species found in the larval state at Abbot's Wood were Lithoda lurid cola, on oak, Pyyaera piyra, in spun leaves of aspen, Geuiiu'tra papilionaria, on birch, Dyschorista itpsilon, under moss and loose bark on willow, and Ayriopis aprilina, in the crevices of oak- trunks. No attempt was made to work the Micros, the only species taken or noted being Tortrix podana, T. niinistrana, Ilo.rana arcnana, Batodes anyiistiorana, Symaethif< u.ryacantlidla { fabriciana), Laiiipronia praela- tella, Adela tibidellu and A. deyeerella. Notes on the larva of Agriades coridon. By R. M. PllIDEAUX, F.E.S. In the hopes of finding some alternative natural food-plant to Hippocrepis coiiiofia for this species, I visited the chalk-hills near Oxted, 8urrey, on June 14th last. Having previously seen the butterfly common on flowery slopes here, where the above herb was scarce or absent, there seemed a possibility of some other leguminous plant being utilized, especially bearing in mind the repeated occurrence of Ayriades coridnn in situations where, chalk or limestone being absent, it is hardly conceivable that a plant so restricted to the latter as is ti. comnsa, could be found growing. Quite near by, however, //. 200 THE entomologist's record. comosa was found locally in some abundance, and a search at the roots of the plants soon revealed the larvae in question, in various stages. They were invariably found huddled amongst the very bases of the long, stringy stems of the plant, and it was no easy matter to dis- entangle these without injury to the larvae. In the majority of cases, yellow ants were found, if not in attendance on, in close proximity to, the larvre so obtained, and, in one instance, where eight were found at the roots of one plant (so closely associated as to suggest a gregarious habit), an ant's nest had been formed below, and the fine powdery earth thrown up had completely enveloped the A. coridon larvae, in no way to their discomfiture, apparently. Though the earth adhered so closely to their bodies as completely to conceal the green and yellow markings, so that they were barely recognisable. These larvae retained their earthy powdering until the next skin- change, or pupation. Having established them in a cage, with their native food-plant, experiments were made with other plants of the order, with a view to substitution, larvae being confined for 24 hours with the leaves (and where possible, the flowers) of the following plants — Lotus corniculatus, Ononis arvensis, Anthyllis vulneraria, Ono- brychis saliva, Trifolium repcns, T. pratense and T. minus. With each of these in succession the larvae showed the utmost dissatisfaction, slowly wandering over them, and round their cage, and returning greedily to the Hippocrepis, when their period of probation Avas over. A minute nibble was essayed from one of the Lotus flowers, and another from a young leaf of Ononis, after which these plants were rejected with disgust. Whatever other plants L. coridon may possibly select in some localities for egg-laying, it seems pretty evident from the above, that larv^ accustomed to Hippocrepis from the outset are unable to change their diet subsequently to any of the substitute food-plants above selected, even Lotus proving a " starvation- alternative," as the writer previously found to be the case when rearing Ayriades thetis {adonis) from the egg. No instance was found of the Hippocrepis blossoms, but only the leaves, being devoured. Pupation is definitely subterranean in captivity, a loose cocoon being formed about half-an-inch below the surface of the earth. This possibly accounts for the inability, some weeks later, to find pupae in nature in the locality where the larvae were previously taken, though they were hunted for at the roots of the foodplant for some time, but without success. The soil not being very dry on this occasion any that might adhere to a dislodged pupa amongst the chalky rubble overhauled would pretty surely render the pupa — never very conspicuous — indistinguish- able from the surrounding earth. Cross- Pairing of Papilio machaon and P. polyxenes. By CECIL FLOERSHEIM, B.A., F.E.S. On June 29th, 1908, I was fortunate enough to obtam a cross- pairing of Papilio machaon and P. poli/xenes (asterias) in my butterfly- bouse. Papilio polyxenes is an inhabitant of the central and southern portions of North America, and belongs to the same group of CROSS-PAIRING OF PAPILIO MACHAON AND P. POLYXENES. 201 umbellifer-feeding Papilios as P. machaon, from which, however, it differs considerably in the imago as far as coloration is concerned, the body in both sexes being black and only spotted with yellow, whilst the male had large portions of what is yellow in the wing-expanse of l\ machaon taken up with black, and the female both in its larger size and colouring closely resembles that of Eujihoeades troiliis, and that of the black variety of Jasoniachs (/laucus ; all these being, presumably, mimics of Laertias pliilcnnr, the only pharmacophagous and highly-protected Papilionid inhabiting the greater part of the region of which they are denizens. The day was a gloriously fine one, and the pairing, which took place about mid-day, lasted about four hours. The P. machaon, which was an English bred male, was a worn specimen, and had lost almost the whole of the right, and part of the left, antenna. The P. polyxenes was a freshly-emerged female and normal in all respects save in that of size, it being rather smaller than is usually the case with that species. When the pairing was at an end, I segregated the P. polyxenes $ , and was successful in obtaining a fair quantity of aya from her, laid on a growing plant of fennel on June 30th and the two following days. The ova both in shape and colour were indistinguish- able through a magnifying glass from those of P. machaon and P. poly.veneii with which I compared them. They began hatching on July 8th, and all the larvjB had emerged by the 11th. As I wished if possible to obtain a second-brood of my hybrids in 1908, in order to avoid the emergence of the butterflies in the autumn, I forced the larvae in a vinery at a temperature which was seldom if ever uuder 85° in the daytime and relatively hot at night; for, had I allowed them to remain out-of-doors, the imagines no doubt would have emerged at too late a period of the year for me to have been able to feed up the resultant larvae. P. polyxenea, I had found before to attempt invariably a second-brood in England, whilst I knew that the hybridizatioii was likely to prove an additional factor in accelerating development. In their early stadia I found the larvae in all respects like those of their parents, which, in turn, I am unable to distinguish between at this period of their lives, both being subject to much variation. In the penultimate instar the hybrids seemed to me somewhat less yellow than those of P. polyxenes, and generally resembling P. machaon. The full-grown larva, however, was exactly like neither. It was larger than that of the average P. machaon, being identical in size with that of P. polyxenea, and had the bluer-green ground colour of the latter, but the chrome-yellow spots of P. polyxenes and the red ones of P. machaon, were replaced by pale orange ones, which were larger than those of the P. polyxenes larvae I have met with, and ahnost entirely broke up the black bands as in some specimens of /'. uiadtaon. The first larvae spun up for pupation on July 26th. The resulting pupje resembled typical P. polyxenes pupte in all respects, and were not in the least like those of /-". machaon, either in shape or in colour wherever a difference presents itself between the parent strains. They even followed those of /-". polyxenes in the longer and slenderer stays of the thoracic girdle. The first imago, a male, emerged on the morning of August 12th, the pupa' having been kept in the vinery at the same heat as the larvre, save that the weather outside had turned colder. It was followed by two others in the course of the week (14th and 17th), both being males. Although T secured 202 THE entomologist's record, some forty pupae of my hybrids, only these three produced imagines, all the rest dying, probably through over-forcing. I have compared the butterflies with the P. poly.rcnes in the National Collection, and though they at first sight seemed to have more yellow on their hind- wings than was the case with the P. pob/.renes, I succeeded in finding some specimens of the latter which resembled exactly my hybrids, which in every respect are unlike P. machaon. I kept one of the three butterflies alive for some days in my butterfly-house, and it paired readily with a fine $ P. machaon (second brood). Alas! the P. machaon was drowned the next night in a thunderstorm. The fact of the pairing, however, may be significant, as, both in 1909 and in 1910, I have been unsuccessful in continuing my experiment, and have failed totally in getting either mctatus, common, Harpalus latus var. erythrocephalus, Cymhidis vaporariorum, Carabus glabratus, Patrobu$ septentrionis, and Miscodera arctica under stones. Anchowenvs ericeti was found on thick patches of pink Sphagnum at the foot of the mountain, a variable series of this brilliant insect being taken. Like ADAPTABILITY TO CLIMATIC ENVIRONMENT. 208 the Klaphrus, it only comes out when the sun shines and is exceedingly rapid in its movements. In moss on the mountains and of the sides of waterfalls occurred Leateva sharpi and L. pubescens, Homalnta silvicola, H . obloiujiiiscida and H. eremita^Ocijin^a incrassata , A rpedium brachypterum, Gymnusa variegata, etc. The very rare Brynporus ru/ipennis and Mycetoporiis monticola were taken by me on Ben-na-buird nearly 4000 feet up. Melanic forms of the following species were found — Lesteva longely- trata (with quite black legs), Klaphrus lapponicus, Anchomenns ericeti and A. parutn}iunctatns, Corymbites aerw/inosiis (nearly black ilio machaun had been common at Elbassan, about 1200 feet above sea level, in West Central Albania. — Philip P. Graves, 1, Lauriston Road, Wimbledon. Jiili/ 20th, 1910. Lepidoptera at ragwort bloom in Richmond Park. — Whilst cycling through Richmond Park on the morning of August 12th, I noticed that a mass of ragwort in full bloom was attracting a good number of insects, although on inspection I found that only three species of lepidoptera were represented. Of these the commonest was lluinicia p/daeas, both sexes of which were flying in numbers, the majority being in good condition. Scarcely inferior in point of numbers was < 'haraeas yraviinis, though all appeared to be J s, and, without exception, were in a very worn state. The third species, Ilydroecia nictitans, was not so common, l)ut it was in fairly fresh 216 THE entomologist's record. condition, and both sexes were attracted by the flowers. — J. Alderson,- 14, Dafforne Eoad, Upper Tooting, S.W. August 22nd, 1910. Hyponomeuta cagnagellus and other lepidoptera at Lewisham IN 1910. — During the last two or three years I have remarked on the occurrence of Hyponomeuta cai/natiellKs at Lewisham, where it is usually a very common garden insect, feeding on Euonyw us japonic a. In spite of its great abundance last year, the species has been less common during the present season than in any since I first observed it, but what has been more remarkable, is the fact that it has appeared so much later than previously. In other seasons, the bulk of the specimens have occurred in July, sometimes earlier, at other times later in the month, but this year scarcely any specimens appeared in July, and it was not until the past week, August 28th onwards, that the species really emerged in any numbers. During the last few days the species has been common, much less so than usual, but between 4.30 p.m. and 5.80 p.m. several ? s were to be seen any day on the wing, flying heavily, but for considerable distances, and busy selecting suitable spots for egglaying. The species is, therefore, at least five or six weeks later than its average time of appearance in this district. I may add also that Bryop/iila perla, now a very local species here, has been more abundant than usual this year ; perhaps the abundance is to be connected with the wet season, which may have suited its foodplant, as the walls have been damp enough and the lichens on those by the sides of the Quaggy seemingly rather more abundant than usual, although I have not paid much attention to the fact ; at any rate, during the last few days several examples have been noticed on the lamps and at the lighted shop windows in the neighbourhood. The partial second- brood of Celastrina aryiolKs, sometimes not uncommon, has been so far represented only by a single . ischalea, (). pinalea, O. jjostfasciata, and O. viicroscoiiica. The life-history of none of the Cingalese species appears to be known, yet some, at least, ought not to be difficult to work out. Of the new species, 0. iiionti;iena and iecophilu)ii, Mots., pmillum, GylL, brisoiiti, Matt.), Gillmei- sTERiuM, Plach {mtidinii, Heer), so that we get the logical result that Ptenidium, Erichson = Matthewsium, Flach, Wankowizium, Flach, Ptenidium, Erichson, and Gillmeisterium, Flach, in other words, that Ptenidium, Erichson, is equal to itself and three other things, which, in the face of our professed binomial nomenclature, appears to be absurd. If the described group-names — Matthewi^imn, Wavknwiziiwi, Ptenidinm, and Gilliiieisterium — are natural divisions, and represent group names next above species, they must be genera, and the useless absurdity termed subgenus falls through. The authors' arrangement — Genus : PTENIDIUM, Erichson. Subgenus : Matthewsium, Flach Species : Ptenidium gressneri, Gillm. P. laevigata, Gillm. P. turgidum, Thorns. Subgenus : Wankowizium, Flach Species : Ptenidium intermediuvi. Wank. Subgenus : Ptenidium, Erichs. Species : Ptenidium punctatum, Gyll. P. fuscicorne, Er. P. myrmecophilimi. Mots. P. pusillum, Gyll. P. hrisouti, Gyll. Subgenus : Gillmeisterium, Flach Species : Ptenidium nitidum, Heer looks to us a trifle absurd as a catalogue production. If the divisions are sound, the arrangement, of course, should be — Tribe: PTENIDIIDI. Genus : Matthewsium, Flach Species : grestineri, Gillm. laevigata, Gillm. turgidum, Thorns. Genus : Wankowizidji, Flach Species : intermedium. Wank. Genus : Ptenidium, Erichs. Species : punctatum, Gyll. fuscicorne, Er. myrmecopliilum, Mots. pusillum, Gyll. hrisouti, Gyll. Genus : Gillmeisterium, Flach Species : nitidum, Heer. To call the division above species a " subgenus " instead of " genus," and the next division higher " genus " instead of " tribe," appears to us to be merely juggling with the orthodox binomial code. Do not British coleopterists also think so ? A good life-history of one of these species would be worth a lot of subgenera. SOCIETIES. 2l9 Mr. J. Ray Hardy mentions {Ent. Ma. Mwj.) that four or five specimens of a dipteron, new to the British fauna, viz., Fannia {Homalomiiia) imi{/)m, Stein., emerged in June last, from an old nest of Vespa riihjath found in Cheshire in February last. Mr. Collin suggests that lloinalniut/ia resparia, Meade, should be compared with the specimens, as well as H. ciliata, Stein., possibly the same as H. vesparia. Mr. G. C. Champion calls attention {Knt. Mo. Macj.) to the descrip- tion of the unique British example of Apion cantiannni, Wagn. {hreficorne, Schulsky), of which other specimens might possibly be found in series of A. Jilirostre. Dr. Wood describes (Ent. Mo. Mar/.) three more species of Phora, civ., P. haltera, P. minutiadma and l\ exii/xa. He also gives most interesting notes on a large number of species. Dr. .Joy describes a beetle new to Britain under the name Crijpto- pharjuH fonieri from Bradfield, obtained in dry wood-dust in old beech trees ; it will be probably found mixed with Cryptophai/Hx scanicus var. patruelis in collections. The first International Congress of Entomology, held at Brussels, August lst-6th, proved a great success. A detailed report is promised for our next number. The thanks of all entomologists are due primarily to Dr. K. Jordan, who brought the idea to a successful com- mencement, and to Dr. Malcolm Burr, who worked so splendidly in its later stages to ensure success. The next Congress is fixed for 1912, and will take place at Oxford — we hope not in early August. A splendid general report by Dr. Burr in The Times for August 10th has attracted a great deal of attention already, outside strictly entomo- logical circles. j^OCIE TIE S. The South London Entomological and Natural History Society. — Jidi/ lith, 1910. — Special exhibition of Polyommatus icarus. — Dr. Hodgson exhibited a large number of selected specimens, many of them being blue 2 s and aberrant undersides. Mr. R. Adkin, geo- graphical series, the most striking of which were those from the West of Ireland. Mr. Joy, long series of the spring and summer broods illustrative of seasonal dimorphism in size. Mr. B. Adkin, some very fine examples from the Hebrides, Isles of Scilly, North Cornwall, Ireland, etc. Mr. Turner, a few aberrations in colour, including specimens from several Swiss localities. Mr. Hemmings, one or two remarkable aberrations, including a thetis-like J , and an underside $ with the eyespots showing extreme displacement. Mr. Pickett, a drawer containing the results of many years selection of forms. Mr. Tutt, in summing up the exhibit, considered it one of the finest and most complete ever got together, and stated that nowhere possibly could such a series have been brought together except by the meml)ers of the South London Entomological Society. Nowhere throughout its range was the species so extremely variable as in the British Isles, those most nearly approaching the British examples comingfromthemoun tain valleys in the north-west of India. He commented on the geographical distribution of the insect, and especially referred to the rarity of the species in its most eastern haunts — in the Altai Mountains and Amur- 220 THE ENTOMOLOGIST S RECORD. land. Bred Celastrina argiolus. — Mr. R. Adkin, some bred examples of C'elastrma an/ioli(s J with much reduced border. Exotic butterflies. — Mr. Edwards, a box of exotic species of Apatxra, Adelpha and Limenitis. Variation -of Prays curtisellus. — Mr. Sich, specimens of Prays curtisellus with ab. rnstica from Westerham. Selected Angerona prunaria. — Mr. Pickett, an extremely fine bred series of Aru/erona primaria, this year's result after twelve years' selection, crossing and interbreeding. Many of the forms were extreme ab. pickettaria. Delegates' report. — ^Mr. Step read the report of the Delegates to the Guildford Congress of the South-Eastern Union of Scientific Societies. July 28th, 1910. — Ova and larva of Lampyris noctiluca. — Mr. Main, the larvfe and luminous ova of the glow-worm, Lampyris noctiluca. Mite on butterfly. — Mr. Clark, on behalf of Mr. Gadge, a specimen of a species of mite found at Ventnor on a specimen of Melanargia (jalathea. It was a species of the genus Tremhidium. A foodplant of Cucullia verbasci. — Mr. B. H. Smith reported the larvae of Cvcidlia verhasci found feeding on Budleyia variabilis. Exotic Satyrines. — Mr. Edwards, a box of exotic Satyrines including Neorina crishna from Java, and several species of the genus Citherias from Central America. Foodplant of Zeuzera pyrina. — Mr. Sich reported finding a larva of Zeuzera pyrina (acsculi) attacking jasmine. August 11th, 1910. — Ova of Acidalia straminata in situ. — Mr. Carr exhibited the ova of Acidalia straminata from Oxshott on heather. Late sallow-bloom. Eggs of Eupithecia subumbrata. — Mr. Sich, sallow- catkins met with during the past week at Eastbourne, and ova of Eupithecia subumbrata laid on leaves of yarrow. Adop^a flava attacked BY mites. — Mr. Rayward, a specimen of Adopaea Jiara (linea) in a moribund condition from being attacked by no fewer than 21 mites. Ova of Emeralds. — He also showed the eggshells of Phorodesvia smaragdaria and Geometra vernaria, and made comparison of the surface structure and the method of oviposition. Coleoptera and Hemiptera attacked by mites. — Mr. West (Greenwich), specimens of Coleoptera and Hemiptera recently met with by him attacked by mites. PiERiDs from North America. — Mr. R. Adkin, a number of " White Butterflies " from North America sent him by Mr. Lachlan Gibb, including a series of the introduced Pieris rapae, a series of P. oleracea, and three specimens taken near Lost River, Canada, in May last, about which comment and opinion were requested. Coleophora silenella ? BRED. — Mr. Turner, a short series of Coleophora silenella (?) bred from the heads of wild sweet-william sent him by Dr. Chapman from the South of France. Wasp's nest. — He also exhibited the nest of a species of Polistes wasp, found at Zermatt in July, 1909, suspended in a bush of alpine rose (Rhododendron). Anthrocera vici^ ab. coNFUSA, Staud. — Captain Cardew, an extremely fine confluent example of Anthrocera viciae {ineliloti), taken in July in the New Forest. A detailed account of this will be found in A Natural History of the British Lepidoptera, i., p. 458. Algerian Epinephele jurtina. — Mr. A. E. Gibbs, a series of Epinephele jurtina from Algeria, having the $ s of the extremely large and bright form ab. fortunata. Exotic Satyrines. — Mr. Edwards, a box of Satyrines including a series of the extremely dimorphic species Heteronympha merope from Australia. Living Mymarids. — Mr. Enoch, living specimens of the egg-parasites, Mymaridae, taken in Richmond Park. ANOTHER BRITISH EXAMPLE OF XYLOPHASIA ZOLLIKOFERI. 221 Another British example of Xylophasia zollikoferi. By J. W. TUTT, F.E.S. Probably one of the most elusive of the Noctuids occasionally captured in Britain is Xylophasia zollikoferi. Up to date only some four specimens have been captured in Britain, full details concerning the first two of which were published in The British Noctitae and their Varieties, vol. i., pp. 71 et seq., whilst a third was noted as captured by Lofthouse at Linthorpe, near Middlesborough, on September 26th, 1903 {Naturalist, p. 456 ; Ent. Rec, xv., p. 345 ; Ent. Rec, xvi., p. 24). This last was figured by Barrett {Lep. Brit. Isles, pi. 424, fig. 5), and has more the appearance in figure of Nonagria arundinis {tijphae) than the species it is intended to represent, owing to the width of the wing on the outer margin. Lofthouse, in recording his specimen, states that " he sugared in his garden throughout the autumn, and on September 26th captured a large Noctuid, which has proved to be Xylojdiasia zollikoferi, particularly worthy of note as having been taken at the time that large numbers of Fijrameis cardui was noticed all along the coast here from Redcar to Sunderland." So far as this is a suggestion that A', zollikoferi is an occasional immigrant, which appears to be absolutely certain, the reference to P. cardui is weak, as the latter immigrates here in May and June, and the autumn specimens are no doubt home-bred from immigrating parents. The earliest example was captured by Harding, at Deal, in October, 1867, the second by Tait, at Inverurie, a few miles from Aberdeen, in September, 1871. The former specimen is in the " Doubleday coll.,'" at the Bethnal Green Museum, whilst the latter was, when The British Noctuae and their Varieties, vol. i., was published, still in Tait's possession. The first was commented on by Doubleday (into whose possession it passed) (see Brit. Noct., i., p. 71), the second by Buchanan-White {Scot. Nat., i., pp. 267-8, and quoted in Brit. Noct., i., p. 71). Freyer, in his Neuere Beitrage, etc., pi. 184, figs. 1-2,. figured and described the species in 1836, and it was then figured by Herrich-Schaffer {Schwett. v. Earopa, figs. 103-104). These figures of Continental examples are all rather different from Harding's and Tate's examples which we described as ab. pallida (see Brit. Xoct., i., p. 72), and Buchanan-White notes {Scot. Nat., I, p. 268) that Herricb- Schilffer's fig. 103 is more like the Inverurie specimen {i.e., our ab. jiallida), and further observes that H.-Schtiffer's fig. 104 looks almost like a different species. This latter has quite a different appearance, though a similar facies, being strongly marked with black longitudinally in the discal area of the wing, and hence having quite a lineated appearance. Recently Mr. A. Plunkett, of Norwich, asked me to name a Noctuid that he could not place, and sent the specimen through Mr. H. J. Turner for this purpose. As soon as I saw it I recognised it as another example of A', zollikoferi. The specimen was captured on September 4th, 1905, atCarrow, near Norwich, considerably worn, but superficially ♦ not at all unlike Herrich-Schilffer's fig. 104, the discal area is dark (had probably been blackish -grey) on which the nervures and outlines of the reniform and orbicular stand out in the pale, somewhat fawn, ground colour, the outer margin is also strongly shaded with October 15th, 1910. 222 THE entomologist's record. dark grey, as well as the cuneiform marks ; the hindwings nearly white with a grey outer marginal band, and grey discoidal. The specimen appears to be a ? . It is a pity that one of the British examples ha« not been risked for eggs as we believe the life-history of the species is quite unknown. Mr. Plunkett writes (September 27th, 1910) concerning his capture, " I took the moth at light, it was sitting quietly under a large electric lamp fixed on the corner of a building, at rest on the brickwork about 12 feet from the ground ; I have curiously taken Nonar/yia arimdinis {tijphae) at the same place before and since, the locality, however, is only about 50 yards from the bank of the Wensum, and open meadow land and marshes extend quite to Yarmouth. When the specimen was pushed off the wall it was skittish, and flew several yards before alighting on the ground, a habit very different from that of N. arundinis, which, being disturbed under similar conditions, drops down like a stone. This really was the first reason I had for suspecting the insect was not A', arundinis.'' There are only five examples (all ^ s) in the British Museum coll., all quite pale in form, and with the exception of the dark shading in the lower part of the discoidal cell, practically without any darker markings. These are labelled " Hungary," " Sarepta (Christoph) " (two), " Kurusch (Christoph)," and " Tura (1903)." Herrich-Schiiffer's fig. 104 represents a $ ; Mr. Plunkett's example also appears to be a ? . One wonders whether the dark striata form is confined to the latter sex. But Herrich-Schiifier's figure shows quite a red tint {r)ifescens) lacking altogether in Mr. Plunkett's specimen. Rebel {Berf/e's ScJwiett., 9th ed., p. 195) says that it flies in Middle Europe in September and October is " very rare near Berlin, Dresden, Chur (Switzerland), Chodan (Bohemia), Lemberg (Galicia), also occurs in Hungary, England, and the Ural district, more common in Central Asia." He adds that " Nothing is known of the early stages." Staudinger gives as its distribution: " Berolinum (2), Helvetia (1), Anglia (2), Halicia (1), Hungaria, Ural, Tui'a oc, Korla, Kaschgar." Notes on Micro=Lepidoptera of South=west London. By ALFRED SICH, F.E.S. Though it is not yet quite the fashion to collect the Tineuia, I am glad to find that several entomologists do take an interest in these small insects, and keep those they happen to capture. This looks hopeful, and, perhaps, in time, we shall have quite a good number interested' in this group, instead of about two dozen as at present. This season, 1910, has been too cold and sunless for the tastes of the Tineina, yet the few bright days have yielded some interesting species. Ill Chiswick, on April 21st, I noticed the larv^ of Bmculotrix cristatella ivere feeding, in their last stadium, on Achillea millefolium. Later 1 had the pleasure of watching one larva spin its peculiar cocoon. Two cases of Coleophora albitarsella were found. May 11th, on Nepcta glechoma, as usual among nettles. I have never yet succeeded in gathering these cases without stinging my hands. In the third week in May Nepticula pygmaeella and N. ignohilella appeared among the hawthorns. On June 16th Ornix guttea was seen at rest on an apple trunk. A few days later I took two Argyresthia brockeella. It is A FEW DAYS AMONGST THE LEPIDOPTERA OF CAITHNESS. 223 strange that I have never before taken this very common species in Chiswick, A specimen of Xepticula centifoliella was bred from rose, July 8th. This species is now more common than N. annmaldla. During this month Gelechia rhomhoidella appeared, but more sparingly than usual. It is very easy to pass over this species as it creeps into the crevices of the bark of apples. I have frequently found it by seeing the tip of one wing only, all the rest of the insect being hidden from view. On August 1st I took a cocoon of Ornix betidae off birch, and one of Xepticula vimincticola from a narrow-leaved willow, this cocoon was spun up on the very tip of the leaf. Both insects emerged the next morning ! It was also pleasing to breed Lithocolletis ^pinicnlella from Chiswick, as I had not before taken it on the Middlesex side of the river. (See Ent. Record, vol. xxi., p. 86.) In Richmond and the surrounding parishes the following species occurred : Lithocollctis stettinensia off alders, and the little green larvje of Ci'destis farinatella in the needles of Scotch pine on May 23rd. On June 3rd Coleophora albicosta was common on furze, but slightly worn, and the larvse of Deprchsaria coatosa fell from the same plant. On one of the few oak palings still existing, Prays cwrtueUus and its var. ritstica was common and in good condition, June 14th, and one Elachista albifrontella was taken among grass. A fortnight later E. triatoiiiea occurred. One Tinea corticella was taken, July 15th, off an oak-trunk. On August 31st I found several cases of a Coleoplmra, very like the cases of C. paripennella, attached to the underside of the leaves of Potentilla torinentilla. I fancy there can be little doubt that they will prove to be cases of C\ potentillae if they are successfully reared. Off the above-mentioned palings one Stenolechia gniiDicUa was taken. On September Gth I went to Ealing to get some cases of Coleophora paripennella to compare with the above-mentioned cases, and found also C. siccifolia. The whitethorn hedges were much discoloured with the m.ines of Cemlostoma scitella. A few days amongst the Lepidoptera of Caithness. By DOROTHY J. JACKSON. Caithness does not appear to possess a very varied lepidopterous fauna, but nevertheless great interest is attached, not only to those species whose favourite haunts are the wild moors and rocky coasts of the far north, but also lo those others, which, spreading northwards, have established themselves firmly where the least encouragement is given them, be it in a hawthorn hedge or a group of storm-bent trees. This year — 1910 — I was fortunate in spending a few days of con- tinual sunshine — from August 22nd to 2Gth— collecting in this interesting county, devoting most of my time to the seaccast and the few far-distant woods. The high cliffs which, in most places, border this fiat expanse of country, are provokingly inaccessible, and only in a few parts can descent be made with safety. There was just such a place at Whahgoe, a little fishing -village about eight miles southwest of Wick, and here amongst masses of knapweed and long grass Epinepliele janira, and even Pohiommaius icariis, in worn condition, abounded. Enbolia mensnraria rose up from the herbage on one's approach, and a specimen of Cidaria fidrata was also noticed. Col- lecting on the cliffs at Noss Head produced but a small variety of 224 THE entomologist's record. insects, such as Sericoris littoralis, Plutella cruciferariim and P, annida- tella, and a specimen in good condition of Scoparia angustea, resting on a grassy bank in a cleft in the perpendicular wall of rock. Dotted over the otherwise uninterrupted surface of the tableland, clumps of trees stand out, sheltering, as a rule, some farm-house from the prevalent northerly winds, which have bent many a tree-top and stunted much of the foliage. The largest wood in the north of the county, planted about 80 years ago, is to be found near Stirkoke, three miles from Wick. Here a miscellaneous collection of such deciduous trees as alder, birch, oak, ash, mountain-ash, hazel, and sallow, struggle upwards to the light, overshadowed by tall spruce firs, whose lower branches are dead and decaying. All are more or less smothered with lichen, for the ground in parts is swampy, the drains being choked up by the spreading roots of the trees. Here from almost every bush Paedisca solandriana was beaten, the most prevalent variety being of a dark reddish-brown ground colour, mottled with whitish-brown, excepting on the edge of the otherwise undefined dorsal patch. Two specimens only of the pale whitish-grey form with purple-brown dorsal blotch were taken, and one of a pale ochreous ground colour with a few dark chestnut -brown markings, somewhat resembling var. trapezina. Next in abundance to P. solandriana came Cidaria immanata, the specimens having the central band varying from dark grey, dusted with white, to black or brownish-black, the portion beyond rich chestnut-brown and the apical region similar in colour to the central band, the difierent colours beautifully separated by slender white transverse lines. Other species noticed were Sciaphila virgaureana, beaten from bushes, and ArgyreMhia conjiigella from mountain-ash. There is very little natural wood in the north of Caithness, but here and there some bushes may be seen by the sheltered bank of a stream; and one such place— the Camster burn — affords a most interesting collecting ground. From the moors in the centre of the county the burn flows between heather banks until, about eight miles from the sea, it passes through a small valley, which is densely covered with such bushes as sallow, birch, hazel and aspen. On a closer inspection the birch bushes in particular were seen to be almost defoliated, and all the leaves that remained were crumpled, brown, eaten, and silkspun. The cause was evident on using the beating-stick, when, from the apparently lifeless bushes, a positive shower of moths came forth, filling the air for a few minutes with their fluttering forms and then settling once more on the bushes or the rocks. Chief amongst these was Paedisca solandriana, exhibiting great variety in colour and markings, var. sinuana being present, in addition to those varieties taken in the Stirkoke wood, and also one interesting form with a pale longitudinal streak extending through the middle of the wing from the base almost to the termen, and cutting up the ordinary markings. One specimen — a $ — has the forewings of a rich dark brown, the only marking being this longitudinal streak in a deep ochreous colour. Ephippiphora similana also abounded, the specimens being rather small, and a few Cerostoma costeUa and Argy- resthia retinella had successfully struggled as larvffi for their share of the birch leaves which now the larvae of Donas coryli-weve finishing. From bank, bush and rock Cidaria immanata arose, all of the dark, handsome aberration described above, and Hypsipetes sordidata was also common, VIRACHOLA (HYPOLYCiENA) LIVIA, KLUG. 225 no particular aberration being predominant, and the colour ranging from the palest sea-green, with a few dark interrupted transverse lines to an almost unicolorous brownish -black. From the sallow bushes, Hypermecui crnciana {muinatana) and Rliacodia caialana were beaten, the latter having a light brownish-grey ground colour strigulated with red or purplish-black. The aspen trees alone appeared lifeless, pro- ducing only a larva of Leiocampa dictaea ; Paedisca opthalinicana, which I have taken here commonly in September, not being yet on the wing, and not a specimen of TacJujptilia populella, which is so abundant in Ross-shire, being seen. From a rose-bush Dictyopteryx bergmanniana was beaten, and in a hawthorn hedge away from the burn Aryyresthia nitidiila abounded. Another day I visited a deep gully near Lybster, through which the Riesgill burn rushes to the sea a quarter of a mile below. Its high steep banks, unlike those of the Camster, are clothed with luxuriant herbage, yet the same bushes of hazel, birch, and sallow, flourish here, unhindered by the winds which sweep across the valley of the higher burn. Despite the greater shelter, the Riesgill valley contained nothing like the same profusion of moths, only one specimen of J'aedisca solandriana being seen, and not even one of Ephijipiphora dmilana. From the dark steep rocks at the water's edge, and from the overhanging bushes and tufts of grass, Hypsipetes sordidata, Larentia olivata, and Cidaria iiiinianata were beaten, and amongst the low- growing herbage Larentia didyiuata and Scopnla lutealis abounded. A specimen of Adkinia hipunctidactyla was also taken. Such are the more interesting species observed, and though I can record no rarities amongst them, the examples to be found of distri- bution and variation would well reward a more lengthy visit to this northern part. Virachola (Hypolycaena) livia, Klug — A Syrian Insect. By PHILIP P. GRAVES. While examining a collection of insects made mostly near Beiriit, by Sig. F. Cremona, I was asked by that gentleman to identify a 2 Lycaenid which he had taken near that town this year. It proved to be a ? of Virachola livia. On September 16th this year I visited two localities near the town where Acacia farnesiana, the food-plant of V. livia in Egypt, grows, and obtained a number of pods containing larvae of this beautiful butterfly. I moreover caught a large and fairly fresh 2 of V. livia, which was ovipositing on pods and flower-buds of the Acacia. Neither Zach, who collected at Beirvit in the forties, nor any other collector has, to the best of my knowledge, reported the presence in Syria of this interesting African species. The question now arises — has F. livia been introduced into Beirut by human agency, or is it a species of African origin, but long established in Syria, as are Castalitts jesous, Uypolimnas niisippus, Danais chrysippiis, and other species which occur near Beirut and in other hot localities in Syria ? The discovery of V. livia at points intermediate between Beirut and the Nile Valley would certainly strengthen the latter hypothesis, and I venture to hope that naturalists who may hereafter visit the Jordan Valley or the plain of Esdraelon will look out for the butterfly wherever " fitneh " {A. far- nesiana) grows. As for the theory of recent introduction by human 226 THE entomologist's record. agency, I may say that the pods of A. farnei^iana, on which F. Ihia deposits its ova, and inside which the larva feeds and often pupates, were at one time much used in Egypt for the tanning of the native soft leather. Owing to the decline of the industry, the use of other tanning materials, etc., they are seldom used now for this purpose, but it is quite conceivable that pods containing larvas or pupaj may have been imported in recent years into Syria from Egypt. The sweet, and to our noses, cloying scent of the flowers of A. farnesiana) makes it a favourite tree in Syria. It grows in a semi-wild state about Beirut, and is cultivated in many gardens in the town. With plenty of its foodplant in easy reach, and a climate warmer than that of Alexandria, V. livia should find no difficulty in establishing itself at Beirut. So much for these two theories. Should the first prove correct, I should expect to see Castaliiis jesons, the larva of which (I am informed) feeds on the same foodplant, give ground before V. livia at Beirut (assuming the latter to have established itself). The voracity with which one larva of T^ livia will devour another in the same pod, notably when the victim has fixed itself for pupation, has always seemed to me to explain the rarity of CasttalinH ubaldus, a near ally of C. jesoKs, in Egypt. I have only twice seen this little "blue" at Cairo, and have but one specimen, a worn 5 taken in November, 1907, while ovipositing on the acacia. One more point and I have done. I stated some time ago in the Ent. Record that I believed that the ants which attend the larva of V. livia devoured its frass. I have seen them pick up pieces thereof and carry them in their mandibles. But at Beirut, I was lucky enough to catch an ant in the act of " stroking " a larva of T'. livia with its antennae, which would suggest that the larva possesses the eversible gland found in so many Lycjenid caterpillars. A few notes on the life-history of Cucullia lucifuga. By P. A. H. MUSCHAMP, F.E.S. Judging from the literature at my disposal, the life-history of Cncidlia lucifiKja seems to be little known, and what information I have managed to gather has proved wonderfully incorrect. Un- fortunately I did not think of hunting up this information until to-day and it is now too late to enlarge upon the few notes I jotted down on my breeding-box. They will, however, prove, I hope, more useful and rather more interesting than the delightful " caterpillar-is-green-and- feeds-on-cabbage " style of description given by Seitz, Spuler, Berge and Co. I will give my notes exactly as I find them jotted down on the paper attached to my breeding-box, notes, which, to my inexperience, setoi rather wonderful and decidedly instructive. On June 27th a Cucullia lucifuga flew in through my study window, and, after banging about the room in an orthodox manner, settled on my writing-table. I boxed it, because there happened to be chipboxes lying on the table; and put it on one side with the intention of looking at it the next day. On the 28th I was too busy to open the box and did not find time to do so till the afternoon of the 29th, when, to my no small surprise, I found 22 promising young larvfe waiting to be fed and their worthy mother still alive in the midst of her descendants. Trusting to their appetites I gave them a piece of dandelion leaf which they promptly attacked with great vigour and execution. The next A FEW NOTES ON THE LIFE-HISTORY OF CUCULLIA LUCIFUGA. 227 day the upper surface of the leaf was completely eaten away and the mother was dead, I have, unfortunately, very little time for breeding insects, but as there is plenty of dandelion to be found in our badly weeded garden I decided that I was by duty bound to help these poor hungry orphans out of their difficulties. The little fellows grew rapidly, and, after three days of chipbox existence, I had to hunt up one of my old breeding-boxes to avoid overcrowding. Their larval life lasted only fifteen days and they fed the whole time right royally. The young larva is of a coal-black colour ; its dorsal and spiracular bands are of a pale yellow, thickening at regular intervals into orange-yellow patches ; the orange-yellow patches look as if they had been painted first and then covered up with ^ pale yellow band, rather smudging the original work. On the spiracular bands the orange spotting is only half as thick as on the dorsal, only one spot to each segment ; each segment of the spiracular has also three setiferous tubercles, set like a triangle. Anything more unlike the young larva of this species than the one represented as such by Spuler (Tafel xxxiii., fig. 18b) it is hard to imagine. At the last moult, the larva gets rid of its skin in the usual manner of the Cucullid larvae; the head grows very pale and then transparent, the insect stays motionless for a couple of hours, then the head splits down the centre and the larva worms its way slowly out. The new skin presents exactly the same appearance as the one it has just got rid of, which also closely resembles the preceding skins ; it is naturally diractly after the moult rather paler, the black is palish browny-black, the yellow spiracular and dorsal bands are, however, just the same as before moulting, the head is of a pale auburn. The larva then remains still and after about an hour has got the normal coat of the preceding instar. Then, as a rule, it moves about a bit, but does not eat, and, finally, takes up a fresh position with the segments well lumped up together and the colour of its last coat proceeds very slowly to change. First a little bluish-grey begins to dust itself into the pigment of the spiracular and dorsal bands ; this deepens very slowly, but regularly, the orange-yellow patches take a deeper orange tint and, after about two hours, the larva I specially note has little to show that there had ever been broad yellow bands; where the bands once were is now a trifle paler than the rest of the skin, which is bow coal- black, the orange patches are very bright and the setiferous tubercles are just barely visible. An hour later the transformation is complete, the larva is now of a rich black colour with, from the 1st to the 8th abdominal segments inclusive, a dorsal row of orange spots, two to each segment, and a spiracular row, one to each segment. The first segment (prothorax) has one (two combined) triangular orange blotch spiracularly and three (first two separated only by fold) dorsally and on the second and third segments (meso- and metathorax) there are two orange blotches spiracularly and three dorsally ; on the two last (13th and 14th) segments the dorsal orange blotches run together and form a continuous line. One abnormal larva had a curious deformation of the 3rd abdominal segment, on which the dorsal baud was broken and turned oft' at right angles laterally right and left, the bands thrown oft' laterally being of the same dimensions as the normal dorsal band contained by one segment ; these lateral bands in order to find room had pushed back the 228 THE ENTOMOLOGIST S KECORD. spiracular bands out of their places so that the latter invaded in their turn the prolegs. The larva moved about awkwardly like an animal with a crooked spine, the 3rd abdominal segment being slightly swollen. I first noticed this abnormal larva during the second instar and naturally expected that it would die ; it, however, successfully went through all the changes, although always retaining its awkward wobbling gait, and in due time pupated. This abnormal larva has, quite unexpectedly, produced an externally normal moth. The larvae pupated in the frass and broken off dandelion leaves. After finishing their cocoons, made by attaching together the refuse with a light web of silk, they remained quiescent at least eight days before metamorphosis. After seven days in the pupal form the first two of them emerged and they have nov/, August 2nd, all become moths.* As the only authorities to whom I could refer speak of the species as passing a considerable length of time in the pupal stage, I felt rather puzzled; even for a species with only one brood the transformations appeared very rapid, but I understand from Mr. Blachier that Guenee notes (Noct., ii., p. 144) the species as common in the Alps in May and August, and Berce {Lep. France, iv., p. 120) the species as double- brooded, occurring in June and August. In conclusion, I venture to express the hope that Monsieur Culot will give us a good figure of the larvae of this moth when he reaches this stage of his present publica- tion, for the figures to be found in the popular picture books might just as well be the larva of any other Cucullid as that of my interesting friend, C. liicifiuja. The moth seems to merit its name, for, although the parent rushed into my room so rashly a month ago, the examples I have bred will make no movement in the daylight, hide themselves in the old dandelion leaves that served as their last meal, and when I open the box make no attempt to escape. One that I threw up into the air did not try to make off by the open windows but just dropped down into a corner of the room. Yesterday, September 28th, I picked up on the road in the middle of the village a full grown larva of C. lucifuga, which is now spinning up. The First International Congress of Entomology at Brussels. The first International Congress of Entomology was held at Brussels from August 1st to 6th, and was a great success in every way. The beautiful weather that was experienced the whole time made the visit most enjoyable. The gay and bright city of Brussels crammed with people, its streets teeming with life all day and a greater part of the night, when the principal parts were brilliantly illuminated, and the fine exhibition, all helped to make our stay there a most ■enjoyable one. All the meetings of the Congress for business were held in the exhibition itself (fortunately the disastrous fire did not occur till after we left Brussels), and the members of the Congress were given free passes. * Spuler says : "DieBaupe lebt im Juli, August an Milchdistel Die Puppen iiberwintern, manchmal zweimal." THE INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS AT BRUSSELS. 229 It was pleasant to notice that Great Britain was so well repre- sented, having the largest number of members. On the evening of July 31st a reception was given to members of the Congress by the Entomological Society of Brussels ; this was very well attended, and it was a great pleasure to make the personal acquaintance of so many entomologists from all parts of the world whom one had only known by correspondence heretofore. The papers read at the meetings were of great importance, being of a high standard and of much interest. In this direction also our countrymen took their full share. It is impossible to cite all the papers read in this notice, but mention may be made of a few of them. Mr. R. Blanchard, a first-class speaker, at the conference on Medical Entomology, gave an excellent account of Sleeping Sickness, Malarial fever, etc. Rev. Pere E. Wasmann, the great authority on the subject, gave a very interesting paper (with lantern) on " Ants and some of their Guests." Mr. W. Schaus read a paper entitled " A quoi sert le Mimetisme? " taking as the basis of his argument the following resiaiie — "Les lois de la nature et de revolution. Observations faites pendant de longues annees dans les foret de la region neo-tropicale. Les oiseaux n'attaquent que rarement les papillous diurnes, qui n'ont pas besoin de se parer de couleurs protectriees." The lecture, by a master, who has spent a vast time in the tropical forests of America, was bound to attract attention. It seemed to us that, in the discussion which followed, the supporters of "Mimicry" had far the better of the argument, both Prof. E. B. Poulton and Mr. G. H. Marshall discussing closely the "Mimicry" side. Mr. A. Handlirsch gave a very fine lantern lecture on " fossil insects " illustrated by many excellent slides. Papers were read by the following of our country- men : — Messrs. R. S. Bagnall, G. H. Carpenter, F. A. Dixey, H. St. J. Donisthorpe, R. S. MacDougall, F. Merrifield, Sir Daniel Morris, Messrs. E. B. Poulton, R. C. Punnett, and F. Theobald. The resolutions relating to Nomenclature and passed by the Congress, read as follows : — 1. It is desirable that the international rules of zoological nomenclature be followed equally by entomology as far as they are adapted to the requirements of this science. 2. It is desirable that descriptions be, as far as possible, accompanied by figures. 3. The names of authors ought to be written, as far as possible, in full. The Committee on Entomological Nomenclature is instructed to draw up, for the next Congress, a list of abbreviations of authors' names. 4. Descriptions which are published only in dealers' catalogues and in news- papers, are to be disregarded (without retro-active effect). 5. The Committee on Entomological Nomenclature is instructed to prepare, for the next Congress, a list of names of genera, species and varieties, whose orthography it is desirable to correct. 6. It is highly desirable that entomological publications bear the exact date of their publication. The Permanent International Committee is instructed to make known this resolution of the Congress to all the publishers and editors of entomological publications. 7. Entomology adopts the law of priority, without exception, for the names of genera, species and varieties. The starting point of nomenclature is the tenth edition of Sijstenia Naturae of Linn6 (1758). 8. The nomenclature section of the first International Congress of Entom- ology considers as being of the greatest importance that a new clause be added to the international rules of zoological nomenclature providing that, at the time of description of a new species or new variety, one example only should be labelled as "type," the other examples examined by the author at the same time as "co-types." 230 THE entomologist's record. Excursions were made to the battlefield of Waterloo, the Congo Museum, etc., etc. On the occasion of the visit to the Brussels Natural History Museum all those present were photographed ; the result is a very good picture of the group. The next Entomological Congress is to be held at Oxford in two years' tinie, when we hope to meet all our friends again. Considerable thanks are due to Mr. Auguste Lameere, president of the Congress, Mr. G. Severin, chief secretary, whose kindness and courtesy to all was much appreciated, and to Dr. K, Jordan and Dr. Malcolm Burr, the promoter and indefatigable International Secre- tary, respectively, to whose untiring energy and support much of the success of the Congress is due. A good general account of the Con- gress may be found in The Times of August lOfch. We hope to deal with the more strictly entomological papers, which at present have received no attention whatever in the reports, when the volume of Proceedings comes to hand. The following is a list of the members assisting at the Congress (an ■''■ represents Life-Members) : — Messrs. Andres, A., Alexandria; Arrow, G. J., London; Assmuth, J., Berlin; Bachmetjew, P., Sophia; Bagnall, R. S., Penshaw ; Ball, F., Bruxelles ; Becker, Th., Liegnitz ; Bivort, A., Fleurus ; Blanchard, R., Paris; Bondroit, Bruxelles; Boone, A., Turnhout ; Bourgeois, J., Ste.-Marie-aux-Mines; Bouvier, E. L., Paris; Braem, R., Bruxelles; '■'Burr, Malcolm, Eastry ; von Buttel-Reepen, H., Oldenbourg; *Candeze, L., Liege; Carpenter, G. H., Dublin; Champion, G. C, London; Glavareau, H., Bruxelles; de Crombrugghe de Picquendaele (baron G.), Bruxelles ; Crahay, N. I., Bruxelles ; Dampf, A., Koenigsberg ; Desguin, E., Anvers ; Desneux, J., Bruxelles ; Dewitz, J., Metz ; Dixey, F. A., Oxford; de Dobbeleer, F., Frasnes ; Dodero, A., Genes ;• Donisthorpe, H., London; Dupuis, F., Bruxelles; Eltringham- H-.,' Oxford ; Encobet, J. Arias, Madrid ; Engels, Ch., Bruxelles ; Everts^; Jonkheer Ed., La Haye ; Ferrant, V., Luxembourg; Forel, A., Yvorne ; Gahan, C, London ; Garcia y Mercet, R., Madrid ; Gedoelst, L., Bruxelles ; Gillanders, A. J., Alnwick ; Goetgebuhr, Gand ; Goffart, L., Bruxelles ; Gounelle, E. Paris ; Guilliaume, A., Bruxelles ; Guilleaume, F., Bruxelles ; Handlirsch, A., Vienne ; Hasebroek, K., Hambourg ; Hastert, P., Luxembourg; de Hennin Boussu-Walcourt (Dom), Maredsous ; de Hennin Boussu-Walcourt, Em., Bruxelles; Hepburn (Sir A. Buchan), London; Holdhaus, K., Yienne ; Holland, W. J., Pittsburgh ; Horn, W., Berlin ; Horvath, G., Budapest ; Howlett, J. M., Pusa; Lnhof, 0. E., Windisch; Jacque, L., Bruxelles ; Janet, A., Paris; Jones, A. H., London ; '-'Jordan, K., Tring; Joseph, Edw. G., Oxford; Junk, W., Berlin; Kerremans, Ch., Bruxelles; Kertesz, K., Budapest ; Klapalek, F., Prague ; Kolbe, H., Berlin ; Kosminski, P., Moscow ; Kiinckel d'Herculais, J., Paris ; Kuntze, A., Dresden ; Lahille, F., Buenos Aires ; Lameere, A., Bruxelles ; Lesne, P., Paris ; Longstaff, G. B., Putney Heath ; Lyman, H. H., Montreal; MacDougall, R. S., Edinburgh; Magretti, P., Milan; Marchal, P., Paris; Marshall, Guy A. K., London ; Martin, H., Bruxelles; Martin, R., Paris ; Mayne, R., Bruxelles ; Merrifield, F., Brighton; de Meijere, J. C. H., Amsterdam ; de Moffarts (baron P.), Botassart ; Morris (Sir Daniel), Boscombe ; Navas, Longinos, Saragosse ; d'Orchymont, Menin ; Olivier, Ern., Moulins ; Osborn, H., Columbus ; Philippson, M., Bruxelles ; Pirsoul, F., Namur ; Poulton, E. B., Oxford ; Punnett, NOTES ON THE LEPIDOPTERA OF BKINL>ISI. 231 R. C, Cambridge ; Reh, L., Hambourg ; Renard, A., Liege ; Riotte, C, Steyl ; Ris, F., Rheinau ; Roelofs, P. J., Anvers ; von Rosen (Baron), Munich; -Rothschild (Hon. N. C), Tring; *Rothschild (Hon. W.), Tring; Rowland-Brown, H., London; Saint Claire Deville, J. Capfe., Epinal ; Sasaki, Chujiro, Tokio ; Schaus, W., London ; Schenkling, S., Berlin ; Schmiedeknecht, 0., Blankenburg; Schnabl, J., Varsovie; Schouteden, H., Bruxelles ; Schubert, K., Berlin; von Schulthess, A., Zurich ; Schultz, A., Villefranche ; Seeldrayers, E. Bruxelles; de Selys-Longchanips (baron M.), Bruxelles; Seitz, A., Darmstadt; Severin, G., Bruxelles ; Simon, E., Paris ; Sjostedt, Y., Stockholm; Skinner, H., Philadelphia; Smits van Burgst, La Have; Solari, F., Genes ; Speiser, P., Sierakowitz ; Steinraetz, F., MaHnes ; Stringe, R., Konigsberg ; Sturgess, W. B., Gerrards Cross ; Szilady, Z., Magy Enved;^ Theobald, F.^ Wye; Trimen, R., Oxford; Tullgren, A., Experimentalfaltet ; Van Biervliet, J., Bruxelles; Van Dissel, E.. D., Utrecht; Vaughan-Williams, R., London; Vermorel, V., Villefranche; Veth, H. J., La Haye; Villeneuve, J., Ramboillet ; Wainwright, C. J., Handsworth ; Meade-Waldo, C, London ; Wasmann, E., Luxembourg; Willem V., Gand ; Wytsman, P., Bruxelles. Ladies. — Mesdanles Ball, Burr, Donisthorpe, Dodero, Horn, Janet,. Junk, Kertesz, Kunckel d'Herculais, Kolbe, Lameere, Longstafi', Morris, Poulton, Rousseau, Saint Claire Deville, Schouteden, de Selys, Severin, Speiser, Smits van Burgst, Trimen, Veth. Misses Brown, Bouvier, Engels, Forel, Kerremans, Le Lorrain, Merrifield, Poulton, Rowland-Brown, E. and M. Solari. . The number of supporters (Universities, Museums, Institutes, Societies) is 270, of which 24 are life members. The complete list will appear in the Proceedings of the Congress. — H. St. J. K. D. Notes on the Lepidoptera of Brindisi. By JAMES A. SIMES. If one may judge from the paucity of notes in entomological journals the far south of Italy is almost terra incognita to British entomologists ; and as, during the last lew years, business has carried me very many times to this region, it has occurred to me that some rough notes on its lepidoptera in so far as I have been able to observe them might not come amiss. On nearly every occasion the town of Brindisi, in the province of Lecce, has been my base and from it I have made short excursions in almost every direction. The extreme south-east of Italy is one vast plain, raised very few feet above the sea-level. The rich red soil is extremely fertile and seems to be exceedingly favourable to vines, which are planted here in enormous numbers and cover huge areas. The few tracts that are not dedicated to Bacchus are planted with olives, apricots, peaches, oranges, lemons, maize, melons, fodder crops and vegetables ; and, between the various plantations, run innumerable mule tracks, where the wild plants of the district struggle fiercely to maintain a footing. In one or two directions, large tracts of moorland are to be found where the Lentisciis and Erica carnea are the principal competitors ; while along the coast and round the harbour mouth there are big areas of rough 232 THE entomologist's record. unclaimed land covered with aromatic plants and shrubs of many species. This coast waste is my principal hunting-ground, and on it I have taken the bulk of the species referred to in the following notes, though, at times, when the fierce sun has burnt up the flowers and herbage of the wild I have been glad enough to make friends with the owners of gardens and seek my quarry amongst their flowers. Here let me say that, personally, I have found the natives of the south quite harmless, inoffensive folk with whom it is quite easy to get on ; and I have made it my business to establish friendly relations with all the goatherds and muleteers whose work has brought them frequently into my hunting-grounds. This is an easy matter, for your southern Italian would almost sell his soul for tobacco ; and the judicious distribution of a few cheap English cigarettes (purchased for the purpose before leaving England), will generally secure for you the good-will of all the contadini in the neighbourhood. If you also add to your entomological outfit a few cheap biscuits wherewith to propitiate the canine belongings of the aforesaid goatherds, you may wander at will over the Brindisine country-side without fear of difficulty or molestation, provided always you do not act rashly. Above all things one should remember never to strike a Southern Italian whatever the provocation. Personal violence is hotly resented ; and I heard of one case where a box on the ear administered to a troublesome boy — who richly deserved what he got — very nearly had a tragic result, and had it not been that a boat was at hand in which the boy's chastiser made good his escape in the nick of time, he would undoubtedly have met his death at the hands of a band of infuriated peasants armed with scythes and mattocks. And there is also an unwritten law as to dogs. If these rush at you and make an unfriendly demonstration, you are free to act as the peasant would act, but you must do no more. The peasant would pick up as big a stone as he could find, and if the dog waited for him to regain the upright position the stone would be used as a missile — but the dog rarely waits for the stone. Most of them have learnt in early days that Brindisine peasants are uncommonly good shots, and Brindisine stones painfully hard, and they regard further demonstration of these ascertained facts as superfluous and unpleasant. If no stone is handy the mere pretence of picking one up will usually suffice. It may be well to mention that a good working knowledge of Italian is necessary to a wanderer in Southern Italy. The peasants understand nothing else ; while even in the towns it is rare to find a person — outside the Hotels and Consulates — who understands French. English and German are almost unknown tongues. To judge from the surprise and curiosity evinced when I first took my walks abroad in this neighbourhood armed with a butterfly net an entomologist had never before been seen by the peasant folk. I well remember the little gathering of contadini who watched me from a respectful distance with absolute bewilderment stamped on their faces. " Ma, che fa qua ?" asked two or three simultaneously of a grizzled old veteran, the doyen of the group. "Non so" replied the oracle, "^ inglese ! " "What further explanation could be required ? Without further preliminaries I will now pass on to the enumeration of the species of lepidoptera with which I have met. Papilio machaon is of frequent occurrence from April to October NOTES ON THE LEPIDOPTERA OF BRINDISI. 233 being most numerous in May when it is to be seen commonly at thistle and scabious blossoms. The examples tend to run larger than those at home but on the whole there is no marked variation. I have frequently found specimens at rest on the dry, inflated seed-heads of Nigella, which is a common weed throughout the district. The females will oviposit on the most stunted and unpromising plants of fennel, and the resultant larvi^ may be found in every month from June ta December. It was in the middle of December that I once found a very dark larva of this species in which the bright green ground colour had practically disappeared owing to the expansion of the black band on each segment. The orange spots were also much reduced in size. Iphiclides poihlini(s is not on the wing so long as the last species. It appears in April and continues in varying numbers until September. The specimens are larger and paler than my Rhone valley examples and the tails are somewhat longer, though the difference is not very marked. When a male and female chance to meet they will often fly to a great altitude chasing one another till almost out of sight, and it is a fine sight to see them sail down from the height with motionless wings and tails trailing out behind like a swallow's. In my experience P.vwchaon rarely, if ever, glides with motionless wings. This species will often oviposit on a bush less than two feet in height. Pieris brassicae and P. rapae are met with the year round, but they vary greatly in numbers from year to year, especially the former. In 1907 P. brassicae was in enormous numbers from May until August, but a very large percentage of the larvffi found in the autumn months were "stung." Both species roost largely in the great clumps of a herbaceous yellow-flowered Salvia which is common in the lanes. The undersides of the leaves of these plants are nearly white and the Pierids deliberately seek them out for their roosting-places. Pieris napi I have never met with here and doubt very much whether it occurs. Pontia daplidice is to be met with from March to September and at times rivals P. brassicae and P. rapae in numbers, but it does not share their preference for the purple composite flowers, haunting instead the small incon- spicuous blossoms of many species of [Mbiatae such as Melissa. The form bellidice is met with, but not frequently, the majority of the examples found being fine, large and well marked insects. Colias editsa is another of the species to be met with the year round, but it is most abundant in May and August. The Brindisi specimens are of a large size and well coloured, many of the males having a rich purple safi'usion when fresh. The spring brood begins to appear very early in May in good years, and a week later the butterfly is everywhere, but is especially common on the rough ground at the mouth of the harbour. The ab. ? helice I have not met with. C. edusa commonly rests on the yellow leaves of a herbaceous Senecio, choosing its roost very carefully and seldom, if ever, settling down upon a leaf that does not " tone " with its own colours. Gonepterux cleopatra is common from February onwards except for about eight weeks, viz., from the middle of April to the middle of June, at the end of which time the new brood appears. Ova and larvfe are to be found freely on the evergreen buckthorn but I have not yet succeeded in finding the pupa. This butterfly is especially fond of red flowers and I should think there can be few finer sights in Nature than that to be enjoyed at Brindisi on a fine day in June, when numbers of f I'esh S G. deupatra 234 THE ENTOMOLOGIST S RECORD. are hovering round the large vermihon flowers of the pomegranate under the deep blue Mediterranean sky. The whole makes up a scene 'Of almost tropical brilliance. Goneptery.v rliamni I have never seen here, and my reference to it on page 133^ of vol. xv., of the Knt. Bee. was a lapf!us calami. Celastrina aiy/iolus is common in both broods. The males are more of a lilac tint than ours, and in the females of the second brood there is a strong tendency towards the disappearance of the blue coloration entirely, its place being taken by a dusky suffusion. Polyoiiimatiis icarus is distinctly scarce and I do not think I have come across a score of specimens all told. Several of the males taken are small, undersized insects, but otherwise my specimens would pass for our ordinary English form. This is not the case, however, with Aricia astrarche, which is nearly always of the var. calida, the orange spots being very pronounced. It is by no means an abundant insect here, but is much more frequent than P. icanis. Scolitantides baton I have taken once only and (jrlaucopsi/che cyllarus only twice, one example in February and one in May. Lampidas hoeticm occurs in two broods — in May and August — and is to be met with in the neighbourhood of the Spanish broom, on which the larvae feed. It is not common and is very capricious in its appearance, and it seems to get worn very quickly. Most of the examples which I have come across, both at Brindisi and in other parts of Italy, have been unfit for the cabinet. Ritinicia phlaeas is more abundant than any of the " blues," and is found commonly in the grassy lanes. I have met with the type in the early spring, but a little later the ab. elens is the only form to be found. The Argynnids are but poorly represented, owing, no doubt, to the absence of woodlands. Is!