\mtowlrJgm*i M& 3v?^w. isfflacc Mrfftvn/ wr I; /£ :S. -£^£^ U. •ESSAY ON THE TREES AND SHRUBS OF THE ANCIENTS : BEING THE SUBSTANCE OF Jfnxir ^tctnxtB DELIVERED BEFORE THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD, INTENDED TO BE SUPPLEMENTARY TO THOSE ON KOMAN HUSBANDRY, ALREADY PUBLISHED. Br C. DAUBENY, M.D., F.R.S., PROFESSOR OF BOTANY AND RURAL ECONOMY IN THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD. JOHN HENRY and JAMES PARKER. 1865. Printeb bn &t*m. |W*«. Cornmwrlut, ©rfort. PEEFACE. THE late Professor Sibthorp, in founding a Chair of Rural Economy to be attached to that of Botany already existing in the University of Oxford, directed that the Holder of that Office should deliver each Term a Lecture on some one of the subjects which the Professorship in question might be re- garded as embracing. In conformity to this regulation, I have, besides placing before my hearers from time to time the newest views on the theory of Agriculture which modern science had developed, given occasionally such sketches of the Husbandry of the Ancients, as could be gathered from the Scriptores Rei Bus twee whose writings have come down to us. The latter have since been embodied in a work published by me in 1857, entitled " Lectures on Roman Husbandry," in which I presented " an ac- count of the System of Agriculture, of the Treat- ment of Domestic Animals, and of the Horticulture pursued in Ancient Times, " concluding with notices 11 of the Plants mentioned in Columella and Virgil. " To this Publication the present Lectures may be iv PREFACE. regarded as supplementary, containing, as they do, a summary of the best information I have been able to collect as to the Trees and Shrubs really intended by those described or noticed in the principal Greek and Roman writers. For this purpose I have availed myself, not only of the researches of Dr. Sibthorp himself, and of the old commentaries on Theophrastus and Dioscorides, which were accessible at the time he left the mate- rials for his Prodromus Florce Grcecce, but also of various works on the Flora of the Ancients, which had appeared in Great Britain, France, and Ger- many at a period more recent. Amongst the latter may be particularised the two Paris editions of Pliny, the one in 10 vols., pub- lished in 1827, under the auspices of Cuvier, Des- fontaines, and other eminent French naturalists, the other, with a French translation, in 20 vols., undertaken by Pancoucke in 1829 — 37, and edited by Grandsagne, with the assistance of several well- known naturalists, but of which the botanical part w7as chiefly contributed by M. A. L. a Fee ; and also the English translation of the same Author by Dr. Bostock and II. T. Riley, Esq., brought out by Mr. Henry Bohn in 1855, which is enriched with a number of useful explanatory notes, for which the Editor has been greatly indebted to the French author last mentioned. 1 may also mention SprengePs Historic Hci Her- PREFACE. v barice ; the Flore tie Theocrite and Flore de Virgile of the same Mons. Fee ; the Flore Poetique Ancienne, by J. B. Du Molin, Paris, 1856 ; Billerbeck's Flora Classica, Leipsic, 1824; Dierbach's Flora Jjriciana, Heidelberg, 1830 ; Fraas, Synopsis Plantarum Florae Classics, Mimchen, 1845; and Lenz, Botanik der alien Griechen und Romer, Gotha, 1859. With the assistance of these and other appliances, it has been my endeavour to affix modern synonymes to as many as possible of the Trees and Shrubs alluded to by Classical writers, although in conse- quence of the vagueness of their descriptions, and the loose manner in which thev noted the cha- racters of the plants that came under their obser- vation, I have found it scarcely within my power, except in the case of a few conspicuous and im- portant species, to do more, than point out with some degree of probability the Natural Family, or at most the Genus, to which the classical desig- nation appeared intended to apply. Upon the whole*, I venture to hope, that this little Work, in conjunction with the " Lectures on Roman Husbandry'' which preceded it, will be found to embrace an identification of a greater number of Greek and Roman plants than is contained in any former English Publication ; although I must in fairness inform my readers, that a still larger list is included in more than one of those German writings which have been already referred to in ▼i PREFACE. this Preface, and that with regard to Pliny, the French edition in 20 vols., as well as the English Translation referred to, contain a reference to many which, being herbaceous, have not fallen within the scope of the present volume. CONTENTS. LECTURE I. Trees producing Fruit — Acorns — and Resin. — Fruit Trees naturalized in Europe — Forest Trees, viz. Oaks — Co- nifers— Distinction of Sexes in Plants, how far recog- nised by the Ancients — Abies — Pinus — Other Conifers . 1 LECTURE II. Trees not included by Pliny under the head of Piciferce. — Cedar — Juniper — Citrus — Cup ressus — Taxus — Others not allied to either of the two preceding divisions, enu- merated according to their place in the Natural System — Tilia — Acer — Cercis — Cytisus — Crataegus — Arbutus — Ornus — Fraxinus — Ulmus — Celtis — Alnus — Salix — Populus — Betulla — Carpinus — Ostrya — Platanus . . 33 LECTURE III. Shrubs of Greece and Italy belonging to the following Genera. — Clematis — Berberis — Cheiranthus — Capparis — Cistus — Dianthus — Linuui — Hypericum — Hibiscus — Vitis — Ruta — Coriaria — Staphylea — Euonymus — Ilex — Zizyphus — Rhamnus — Pistacia — Rhus — Ulex — Spar- tium — Cytisus — Ceratonia — Colutea — Anagyris — Coro- nilla — Medicago — Psoralea — Anthyllis — Ononis — As- tragalus— Hedysarum — Lotus — Acacia — Rosa — Rubus — Prunus — Amy gdalus — Poteri urn — Mespilus — Pyrus — Tamarix — Ribes — Bupleurum — Philadelphus — Sem - pervi vum — Myr tus — Hedera — Sambucus — Lon icera — Scabiosa — Ernodea — Conyza — Santolina — Artemisia — Senecio — G-naphalium — Staehelina — Centaurea — Cine- raria .......... 64 vi PREFACE. this Preface, and that with regard to Pliny, the French edition in 20 vols., as well as the English Translation referred to, contain a reference to many which, being herbaceous, have not fallen within the scope of the present volume. CONTENTS. LECTURE I. Trees 'producing Fruit — Acorns — and Resin. — Fruit Trees naturalized in Europe — Forest Trees, viz. Oaks — Co- nifers— Distinction of Sexes in Plants, how far recog- nised by the Ancients — Abies — Pinus — Other Coniferae . 1 LECTURE II. Trees not included by Pliny under the head of Piciferce. — Cedar — Juniper — Citrus — Cupressus — Taxus — Others not allied to either of the two preceding divisions, enu- merated according to their place in the Natural System — Tilia — Acer — Cercis — Cytisus — Crataegus — Arbutus — Ornus — Fraxinus — Ulmus — Celtis — Alnus — Salix — Populus — Betulla — Carpinus — Ostrya — Platanus . . 33 LECTURE III. Shrubs of Greece and Italy belonging to the following Genera. — Clematis — Berberis — Cheiranthus — Capparis — Cistus — Dianthus — Linuin — Hypericum — Hibiscus — Vitis — Ruta — Coriaria — Staphylea — Euonymus — Ilex — Zizyphus — Rhamnus — Pisfacia — Rhus — Ulex — Spar- tium — Cytisus — Ceratonia — Colutea — Anagyris — Coro- nilla — Medicago — Psoralea — Anthyllis — Ononis — As- tragalus— Hedysarum — Lotus — Acacia — Rosa — Rubus — Prunus — Amygdalus — Poterium — Mespilus — Pyrus — Tamarix — Ribes — Bupleuruin — Philadelphus — Sem - pervivum — Myrtus — Hedera — Sambucus — Lonicera — Scabiosa — Ernodea — Conyza — Santolina — Artemisia — Seuecio — Gnaphalium — Staehelina — Centaurea — Cine- raria .......... 64 Vlll CONTENTS. LECTURE IV. Shrubs of Greece and Italy belonging to the following Genera. — Erica — Rhododendron — Azalea — Vacciniurn — Ligustrum — Phillyrea — Jasminum — Convolvulus — Lithosperinutn — Onosma — Origanum — Teucrium — Pe- riploca — Solanum — Lycium — Yerbascum — Phlomis — Rosmarinus — Satureia — Lavandula — Salvia — Thymus — Molucella — Prasium — Stachys — Vitex — Salsola — Sali- cornia — Atriplex — Polygonum — Laurus — Daphne — — Passerina — Osyris — Eheagnus — Aristolochia — Eu- phorbia— Buxus — Ephedra — Asparagus — Aloe — Ruscus — Smilax Remarks on the dissemination of Plants — and on the decay of Species — Inquiry into the causes affecting the latter — Concluding Observations . . . .103 Index or Glossary consisting of an enumeration of the Trees and Shrubs supposed to be indigenous in Greece and Italy, with their ancient Greek and Latin Synonymes . 145 ON THE TEEES AND SHKUBS OF THE ANCIENTS. LECTURE I. ON TREES PRODUCING ERUIT— ACORNS — AND RESIN. TJAVING in my former Lectures on Rural Eco- nomy included an account of the gardens of the ancients and of the plants therein culti- vated, I propose on the present occasion to intro- duce to your notice the trees and shrubs which constituted their forests, or were admitted into their pleasure-grounds and plantations. For this Pliny is our principal authority, as in his 12th and subsequent books he enters at large into the subject of trees and forests, regarding them as the most valuable presents conferred by Nature upon mankind. It .was from the forest, he says, that man drew his first aliment, by the leaves of the trees his cave was rendered more habitable, and by their bark his clothing was supplied ; in- deed, even in his day, nations existed which had not advanced beyond this primitive condition. Now it is worthy of remark, how many of the trees that we know to be well adapted for the cli- mate of Italy, had nevertheless, according to Pliny's account, been traced to a foreign source. Amongst Fruit-trees, we are assured that the Cherry, the Peach, the Quince, the Damson, the B 2 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. Jujube, the Pomegranate, the Apricot, as well as the Olive, and probably even the Vine, were of foreign origin. Thus the Cherry was brought from Pontus by Lucullus after his victory over Mithridates ; the Peach, or Mains Persica, was introduced from Persia ; the Quince, Mains Cgdonia, from Crete ; the Damson, Primus Damascena, from Damascus ; the Olive, in the reign of Tarquinius Priscus, from Greece ; and even the Vine, though considered by Pliny as indigenous to Italy, probably found its way there from the same country. As to the Plum, the wild variety, Primus insititia, is indigenous in Italy, but the Apricot was im- ported from Armenia, as was the Jujube tree from Syria. The Pistachia tree, Pis facia vera, Z., which yields the nuts so common in the south of France and in Italy, was introduced from Syria by Vitellius, as late as the reign of Tiberius, and from the same country came the Carob tree, Ceratonia siliqua, now abundant everywhere. From Syria was derived the common Fig, Ficus carica ; from Egypt the Sycamore Fig, Ficus syca~ morus ; and from Carthage the Pomegranate. Even the Medlar did not exist in Italy at the time when Cato wrote. The only native fruit-trees therefore were, per- haps the Mulberry, Morns of Pliny, which abounded in Italy, though not known in early Greece, and therefore is by some believed to have been im- i.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 3 ported from the East ; and more certainly the Apple, the Pear, the Plum, and the Sorbus ; of which latter Pliny enumerates four varieties, one of which with fruits round like the apple, may be the Sorbus domestica of modern botanists — a tree which, though not common, is considered as indigenous even in the northern parts of Europe, and yields a fruit somewhat resembling the Medlar. As to the other fruits, they appear, like domestic animals, to have followed man in all his migrations ; and it becomes a problem, for those who maintain the late introduction of our species upon the earth, to account for so many useful vegetable produc- tions being known already at the period of the earliest historical records, considering that now, when the whole earth has been ransacked by modern travellers, only the Maize, the Potato, and the Tobacco amongst herbaceous plants, and the Tea and Coffee amongst shrubby ones, have been added to the list of articles of daily consumption since the date of the discovery of America. Yet when we consider, that out of the 200,000 species of plants supposed to exist upon the earth's surface, not more than a few hundreds are calcu- lated to afford to the human race useful products, (except indeed as timber-trees or for fuel, which could not be easily transported from one country to another,) it is contrary to the doctrine of chances, that many of those trees which minister to man's wants or luxuries, should have been found growing in any one of the countries in which he was in- b 2 4 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. duced to settle. Even of those genera which afford edible fruits, not more than one or two species possess the qualities which tit them for man's sub- sistence; and in the natural course of events, cen- turies must have elapsed before their useful quali- ties were discriminated, and the species selected had multiplied sufficiently to be diffused over the countries even in which they were indigenous. The trees above mentioned, indeed, although exotics, are perfectly well adapted, not only to Italy, but even to countries much less favourably circumstanced as to climate, but the same cannot be said of the Mains Assyria or Mains medica, to which Pliny alludes. This tree has been supposed by Sprengel and others to be the Citron, or Citrus medica, but a late writer, Fraas, contends that it agrees with the Shaddock, both because this tree is a native of the East, whereas the Citron comes from North Africa ; and also because it is used, as the Malm Assyria was, for perfuming clothes by the aromatic fragrance of the oil with which it abounds. Be that as it may, the fruit was not eaten, being, as Virgil describes it, " Trislis succi, tardique sapor is." The true Orange, on the contrary, does not appear to have been introduced into Italy till the ninth cen- tury after Christ. Alphonse Decandollea regards it as a variety of the Citron, which according to him is a native of China, and was gradually transported to the West by the Arabians and others. The " Geographic det Plantes, i.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 5 Crusades probably assisted in its dissemination through Europe. The Golden Apples of the Hesperides, which some have supposed to be Oranges, seem rather to have been some variety of the Apple tribe. No well-authenticated account is given by the prose writers of antiquity of the Citron being used as a fruit, and when Virgil introduces the shepherd Menalcas sending " aurea mala' to Amyntas, the poet could not have intended Oranges, which cer- tainly were not cultivated by rustics at the time he wrote : — 44 Quod potui, puero sylvestri ex arbore lecta Aurea mala decern misi, mox altera mittam V In alluding to the various kinds of Indian Pepper, Pliny mentions one which is grown in Italy, larger than a Myrtle, and not very unlike it in appearance. Sprengel imagines it to be the Daphne Thymelcea, but this is uncertain. The Date Palm is also spoken of by Pliny as having been introduced in his time into Europe, and it is interesting to find that those on the coast of Spain at that period bore fruit, as at present the only place in Europe where ripe Dates are grown is Elche, in Valencia. In Italy they are stated to have been barren, which agrees with our present experience, for in the most favoured climates in Italy, such as the Riviera, north of Genoa, though the Date Palm grows remarkably well, and rises to a great height, it yields no dates. This is the case even with those at Bordighera, on the road to Nice, b Second Eclogue. 6 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. where plantations of Palm-trees extend almost to the dimensions of a forest, being cultivated to supply the churches of Italy with branches for Palm Sunday. The Walnut is the largest of the class of trees mentioned by Pliny as producing edible nuts. Only one species, the Juglans regia, appears to have been known in ancient days, and from the names given to it of Persicum and Basilicum, Pliny infers that it originally came from Persia. Even the Filbert, which from its abundance in the district round Abellinum (now Avellano), in Campania, was called Nux Abellina, came originally from Pontus, and was thus sometimes called Nux Poniica. The Almond, Amygdalus communis, now so com- mon in Italy, seems hardly to have been known in the time of Cato, unless he alludes to it by the name of the Greek nuts, which from the epithet acriores applied to them, may seem to have been intended for the Bitter Almond. Columella speaks of the Almond by the name of Nux Grceca. I next proceed to describe the Forest trees noticed by ancient writers. Pliny divides them into two classes, the glandiferous and the pitch-bearing ; the former including all the Catkin-bearing trees, or Amentacea, known to the ancients, the latter most of the Coniferce. We shall see, however, that there are many which cannot be included in cither division. The glandiferous seem to be comprehended under the common name of Quercua or Bo bur. Thus Pliny i.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 7 speaks of the great Hercynian Forest as consisting of Rohora contemporary with the creation of the world, and of gigantic size, respecting which he reports many marvels c. The Beech, from its possessing a kind of acorn, is ranked amongst glandiferous trees, and there- fore amongst Oaks. It appears to have been indi- genous in the mountainous parts of ancient Europe, and to have spread gradually towards the West, for it was not known in Holland, nor probably in England or Ireland, at the time of the Norman Conquest. It was not the (prjyos' of Theophrastus, who speaks of our Beech d under the name of 'O^vr], but it was the Fagus of Pliny, whose description, both of its leaves and its fruit, agrees sufficiently well with our Beech, and entirely differs from that given of the Oak genus. The Chesnut, for the same reason and with greater propriety, is classed amongst the Acorn tribe, but from the value of its nut as an article of food, it is placed by Pliny amongst Fruit-trees. It was applied to the same uses then as now, being not only roasted entire, but also ground into a sort of polenta or flour, for the nourishment of the pea- santry. The best were those grown about Naples and Tarentum. c Caesar, Bell. Gall., lib. vi. c. 26, mentions the Reindeer, Bos cervi figura ; the Alces, the Elk ; and the Urus, the Wild Bull, Bos priscus ; all three animals extinct in that country, as living in the Hercynian Forest. There is a figure of each of them in the Delphin Edition of Caesar. d Lib. iii. 10. 8 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. Pliny states that the tree was introduced from Sardis in Pontus, and hence was called the Sardian Acorn ; but its general distribution over all the warmer portions of Europe might rather lead us to regard it as indigenous. It forms indeed extensive forests, extending along the south of France, through Italy and Dalmatia, and re- appears in Asia Minor, where it supplied Xenophon's whole army with food in their retreat along the borders of the Euxine. It has been supposed, that it was at one time so abundant in England as to be regarded as native, and the large beams of our old cathedrals and mansions have been said to be constructed of it ; but no plant can be considered as indigenous to a country which does not ripen its fruit in it, and this can scarcely be said to be the case generally with the chesnut in England. Those, however, who do not think this argu- ment conclusive, may see the subject discussed in the 59th volume of the Phil. Trans, by Daines Barrington, and in the 61st by Dr. Ducarel, the former of whom takes the negative, the latter the affirmative side of the question. Pliny enumerates twelve species of Oak as known to him, but amongst these is the Beech, which we place in a distinct genus. The remaining eleven are as follows : — 1. Quercus. 2. Robur. 3. Esculus. 4. Cerris. 5. 6. Ilex — two kinds. 7. S iiber. 8. Hemeris. 9. JEgilops. 10. Latifolia. 11. Haliphloeos, i.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 9 Now the following species of European Oaks are distinguished hy modern Botanists, arranged after the plan of Decandolle in his late revision of the family of Cupuliferse e. Genus Quercus. Divided according as they ripen their seeds in the first year, or in the second ; and then again according as their leaves are deciduous or per- sistent. Oaks ripening their seeds the first year, and with deciduous leaves. Locality. Quercus robur, British Oak, includ- \ ing as varieties — / _ . . . « .,.« [ .bound throughout Sessilmora, ° Peduuculata, ) Pubesceus. Esculus, Italian Oak. Chiefly in Tuscany. Ditto with leaves persistent. Q. ilex, Holm Oak, including ) _, ,, „ -~ ' . , ,, . ,. South of Europe. Gramuntia and other varieties. ; Q. suber, Cork-tree. Soutli of Europe. 2nd. Oaks ripening their seeds the second year, and with deciduous leaves. Q. cerris, Turkey Oak, including as \ a variety Q. ballota, found also > Greece and Turkey, in Syria f. / e See Gay, Ann. des Sc. Nat., 4th Series, vol. vi., and Endlicher, Genera, Suppl. f Hooker. 10 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. Ditto with persistent leaves. Q. pseudo-suber, jfaZse Cork-tree. Italy. Q. J£gilops, Valonia*. Levant. Q. coccifera11, Kermes Oak. South of France. The only Oak mentioned by Hooker as occurring in Syria, which is not indigenous in Europe, is Q. infectoria, abounding in red galls, and placed on that account by Spach, in a distinct section, Gal- lifera, under which head Endlicher includes also Q. humilis, Q. alpestris, and Q. hispanica or lusitanica, which latter, however, Gay places under Cerris. Let us now endeavour to identify these species with the varieties of Oak enumerated by Pliny. The first two, Quercus and Bobur, are often given by ancient writers as generic terms for the Oaks, or acorn-bearing trees; but in his 16th Book, in which he mentions the several varieties of the genus Quercus, Pliny, as M. Fee thinks, would apply the term Quercus and Bobur to the two varieties of Quercus robur, the sessiliflora and ped- unculata, recognised by modern botanists. As, however, the distinction between these two varieties is one of a botanical kind, hardly likely to be recognised by a Roman naturalist, being de- pendent on the fruit being in the one case attached « JErjilops is found in Syria, and its acorns, which arc often very large, are eaten by man. Hooker, Linn. Tr., v. xxiii. h In Syria the most common Oak is pseudo-cocci/era, which Hooker thinks may be a variety of cocci/era, Linn. Tr., vol. xxiii. Abraham's Oak at Mamre, of which Hooker givc3 a drawing, is of this species. i.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 11 directly to the branch, and in the other seated on a footstalk, I must suspend my opinion on this point until further proofs are forthcoming, and for the present shall be content with supposing, that both these names apply to species or varieties of Oak of the largest size, and of the widest dis- tribution throughout Europe. We next come to his Esculus, a name applied by the moderns to a species of Oak found especially in Tuscany, and furnishing acorns so sweet as to be much eaten by the peasantry. In olden time the acorn, as wre read in Homer and Hesiod, was the common food of the Arcadians, so that the tree which yielded it must have been different from the Oak of this country, the fruit of which is bitter and distasteful. Yet Pliny tells us, that the best and largest acorn is that which grows upon the Quercus, and only the next to it in quality on the Escidus. Some writers identify the latter with the Beech, regarding it as a synonym for the Fagus of the Latins, and the (priyo? of the Greeks, which latter name they suppose was derived from the fitness of its fruit for food to man. The Beech-nut, in- deed, is sweet and not unpalatable, so that in the south of Europe it is eaten by man as well as by beast. Virgil, in his 2nd Georg., describes the Escidus thus : — " jSemorumque Jovi quae maxima frondet Esculus." 12 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. Distinguishing it from Quercus by adding — " Atque habitse Graecis oracula quercus." He also describes it as deeply rooted — " Quautum vertiee ad auras iEthereas, tautum radice ad Tartara tendit." A description, however, which he transfers to the Quercus in the 4th iEneid. But Virgil and Horace do not seem to speak of the same tree as Pliny, for his Q. esculus is a small tree, whilst their descriptions apply to one of gi- gantic proportions. Martin1 justly remarks, that although the tree may be the (^7770? of Theophrastus, it cannot be the Fagus of Pliny, for the latter describes the Fagus as having its gland included in a triangular covering, and with a leaf small and very light, resembling the Poplar ; remarking that the different species of Oak have a gland, property so called. Ovid also and Virgil both describe the Esculus as having large leaves. It seems to have been less common in Italy than the Quercus, although Horace speaks of extensive forests of it in Apulia. I cannot, therefore, submit to Martin's view, that it is the sessile variety of the common Oak, but regard it as the Tuscan Oak, Quercus esculus of the moderns. Pliny and Theophrastus both describe an Oak under the specific name of Ilemeris, r)nepis. The latter term was evidently applied to it by the 1 Notes on Ceon*. 2. i.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 13 Greeks on account of the mild or sweet charac- ter of the acorn, as contradistinguished from the bitterness of other varieties, just as we speak of the sweet Chesnut to distinguish the fruit of the Spanish from that of the Horse Chesnut. Pliny states, that although a small tree, it bears the largest acorn of any of the Oak tribe, and also yields the best gall-nuts. Sprengel seems to regard it as the Quercus cerris, but if so, it must be the tree which Decandollej distinguishes as Q. toza, and which, as he suggests, may be a dwarf variety of Cerris, a tree too lofty in its ordinary character to agree with the Hemeris of Pliny. The Ilex of that author and the Tlplvos of Theophrastus, are evidently our Quercus ilex, or Holm Oak. Pliny enumerates two varieties of this evergreen tree, but the one with a leaf not unlike the Olive, called smilax by the Greeks, and aquifolia by the Latins, is not an Oak at all, but probably our com- mon Holly, the Ilex aquifolium of modern botanists, belonging to the family of Rhamnece. This plant, however, only bears a berry, and has no fruit re- sembling the Oak, a circumstance which may throw a doubt upon its identification, and lead us to be- lieve that Pliny must have intended some particular kind of evergreen Oak. Under the term Ilex, Pliny, however, confounds with the Holm that species of evergreen Oak 1 Fl. Fr. Suppl. 14 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. indigenous to the south of Europe, which from its being subject to the attacks of the insect called the Coccus ilicis, occasioning by its puncture a little red gall, known as Kermes, is denominated by modern botanists Quercus coccifera. This scarlet berry, or grain, as Pliny calls it, was highly prized in dyeing until the discovery of the cochineal insect, which from its brighter hue has superseded it, and in the time of the Romans it was a great article of commerce, furnishing to the poor of Spain the means of paying one-half of the tribute exacted of them. Pliny, however, has committed the double inac- curacy, of confounding the tree which bears it with the Ilex, which indeed is not surprising, as they are both evergreen species of the same genus, and also with the A qui folium, which is, as already remarked, our common Holly. The HalijjJdceos is stated as being the worst of any, both for firewood and for timber, having a re- markable thick bark, and a trunk, which although of considerable size, is for the most part hollow and spongy, so that it rots even whilst the tree is alive. It rarely bears acorns, and what there arc, have a taste so bitter and forbidding that no animal will touch them. The description seems to correspond best with the Q. pscudo-suber of the present day, a native of the mountains of Tuscany, Spain, and Barbary, the bark of which is corky, although in a less degree than the true Cork-tree. i.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 15 Its name is taken from 'AA/^Acko?, a kind of Oak described by Theophrastus much in the same terms as those which Pliny uses, and deriving its name from aA?, ' salt/ and (photo?, ' bark/ The Q. cerris of Pliny would seem to be the Turkey Oak of modern writers, although there is much confusion in the account given of it, and we have seen that some imagine the Hemeris to be the Cerris of botanists, which however does not accord with the bitter character of its acorn. The Suber of Pliny is the 0eAAo?' of Theophras- tus, both of which are described in such a manner by the Greek as well as by the Roman naturalist, as to identify them with our Cork-tree. The only circumstance which might lead us to doubt this, is that in one passage Theophrastus states that it sheds its leaves annually, whereas our Cork-tree is an evergreen. In another passage, however, he calls it, as Pliny and other Roman writers have done, an evergreen. Commentators have tried to get over this difficulty, by pointing out that there is actually a variety of the Cork-tree, which sheds its leaves in April, and which has been observed near Bayonnek. The time of shedding the leaves is, indeed, not characteristic of a species, for the Lucombe Oak1, which passes for an ever- green, as its leaves remain on all the winter, is k Clusius, Plant, rar. Hist., lib. i. c. 14, and Miller's "Gardener's Dictionary." 1 Pliny, lib. xvi. c. 21, records as a marvel, that a single Oak (Quer- cus) existed in the territory of the Thurii, where Sybaris formerly stood, which never lost its leaves, and did not bud till Midsummer. 16 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. a variety of the Turkey Oak, the leaves of which are deciduous. Cork was employed by the ancients for many of the same purposes for which it is used at present, as for the soles of sandals for females, both to keep out wet and to make them ap- pear taller. Also for swimming-jackets m and for floats. But though it was sometimes employed for stop- ping the holes of casks, its application to this ob- ject does not appear to have been common, as pitch, clay, gypsum, and even oil or honey, were used for excluding air from their liquors. Indeed until glass bottles were in rise, corks would be rarely wanted for the purposes to which they are mainly applied at the present time. The JEgilojjs is stated to be the loftiest tree of all, and to be attached to w7ild, uncultivated .spots, producing, according to Theophrastus, the hardest and best timber of any. It is probably the species now known as JEgilops, the finest and tallest of the Oaks that occur in Greece, and the one which affords the acorns used in dyeing, called Valonia. The Latifolia is only described by Pliny as being next in height to the JEgilops, so that it seems difficult to identify it. It is called 7rXaTv(j)v\Xo^ by Theophrastus : query Quercus Toumefurtii Pers., which is generally regarded as a synonym of Q. c err is, or the Turkey Oak. ■ VI at. in vita Camilli, i.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 17 Pliny enumerates the various uses to which trees of the glandiferous or cupuliferous family were ap- plied in his time. We have already alluded to the Kermes employed as a dye, and have also noticed the galls, found, as Pliny says, on all species of Oak, and probably in- deed on most. Of this the Hemeris and the Latifolia produced the best kinds. That the galls were occa- sioned by the eggs of an insect deposited upon the leaf or bark of the tree, the ancients do not appear to have been aware, although Pliny notices, that a kind of gnat is produced in the veins of the leaves, and comes to maturity just in the same way as the ordinary gall-nut does. Pliny also notices the edible mushrooms which grew at the roots of the Quercus, and which were highly esteemed in cookery ; and also the Agaric of the Oak, a fungus which is used as a styptic, and furnishes the description of tinder called in modern times Amadou. He also mentions Cachrys, as a useful medicinal product obtained from the Robur, the nature of which is not knowm to us, though probably either a fungus or some kind of excrescence. The acorn of the Beech, when given to swine, makes them brisk and lively, and renders their flesh tender, and easy of digestion. Next to this stands the acorn of the Cerris, but that of the Hex is less wholesome to them. The acorn of the Que reus and of the Latifolia was in much esteem as an article of food for man. 18 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. The Oak tribe, too, stood highest in the list of timber trees, and the best shingles for covering the roofs of houses were obtained from the Quercus robur. Its bark was also applied to a variety of uses, and especially to covering the roofs of houses ; that of the Cork-tree, as we have seen, to most of the purposes for which in modern times it is made available. I will conclude this account of the Oak tribe by classifying the Oaks known to the ancients ac- cording to the system proposed by the younger Decandolle : — Quercus. Fruits. Leaves. Ancient names. Modern names. r Deciduous Robur Robur IP 'c \ „ „ Esculus Esculus J Persistent Ilex Ilex and Coccifera >rear' I „ „ Suber Suber C Deciduous Hemeris Toza The 2nd \ „ „ Cerris Cerris year ) Persistent Halephlaeus Pseudo-suber (?) L ,, ,, iEgilops iEgilops I shall now proceed to notice another class of trees, distinguished by Pliny under the name of pitch -bearing, comprehending those now known as the Conifer Sa/Lu, evident corruptions of the Latin and Greek names, are applied to this tree, and also because the descriptions presented to us by- classical writers correspond in a general way with tbe characters belonging to the Maple tribe. The name of Acer is derived from the pointed character of its leaves ; and Pliny describes the tree as nearly of the same size as the Lime, stating that slabs cut from it are superior even to the Citrus in the beauty of its wood, and are only less adapted for cabinet-work from their inferior size. But in identifying the Acer of the Romans and the ^(pevSa/jLvo? of the Greeks with some particular species of Maple, and in imagining that the ancients applied these terms consistently to one and the same tree, modern writers have been much too pre- cipitate. There can be no doubt that Ovidn had in view a different plant, when he speaks of the Acer vile, even though in another passage he alludes to the variegation of colour for which its timber was prized, from that which Virgil alluded to in speaking of the wooden horse of Troy, and of the spear of King Evander, as being constructed with beams of this wood ; as well as in associating the tree in question with the lofty Fir, as constituting the sacred groves of Phrygia °. "Nigranti picea trabibusque obscurus acernis." The Acer of Ovid would seem to agree best with ■ Elog. i. 11. 23. o &Um jx. 87. 46 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. the afyevSafivos aypia of Theophrastus, which that writer pronounces as useless for timber ; but for the Acer of Virgil we must surely look to some other variety, more conspicuous for stature, strength, and durability, such as the Sycamore. Indeed the word afyevbaixvos is said to be de- rived from afyevftovr], the bezel of a ring, or the part encompassing the stone, which required to be hard and compact; and at any rate afyevbaiivLvos is used adjectively in Aristophanes1' for tough, or as we should say, heart of oak. Now Theophrastus q mentions another variety which he calls Zvyla, the wrood of which, he says, is yellow, and crisp, or twisted in its fibre (ovXop), and he adds that the people of Stagira recognised a third, affording a white and tough (evli/ov) timber, which is called KXivorpoxov, a term applied to it on account of its fitness for making the rollers upon which bedsteads turn r. Pliny says, that the Greeks distinguish the Acer of the plains, which they call glinon, and the wood of which is white and not wavy, from that of the mountains, the wood of which is harder and more variegated. The distinction between male and female trees, which runs through all the classical writers, though in a different sense from that in which we employ it, is here noticed, and the former is said to be best adapted for ornamental purposes. But besides these two, there is a third kind, p Ach. ]8L -> IT. PI. iii. 10. r Sec Btapel, Notce in Theoph. ii.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 47 called zygia, with a red wood, easily split, and with a pale rough bark. He, however, as already stated, whilst noticing that there are several varieties of Acer, specifies only three : First, the Gallic, remarkable for the extreme whiteness of its wood, and known as the Gallic tree, a native of the countries beyond the Alps; the second, another covered with wavy spots, and from its beauty called the pavonia, the finest kinds of which come from Istria and Rhcetia; and the third an inferior kind, called the crassivenum, or thick -veined. Now the Zvyla of Theophrastus, the wood of which is stated to be yellow and soft, best corre- sponds with the Acer platanoides, or Norway Maple, whilst the KXivorpo\os agrees better with the Acer pseudo -plat anus, or Sycamore, as he describes it as having leaves lobed like the Plane, but less fleshy and pointed at the apex, with a bark less smooth than that of the Lime, slightly spotted, and with scanty roots, and these horizontal. Its flower, he says, is unknown, and its fruit is like that of the Paliurus. It grows in marshy places about Mount Ida. Both these species of Acer are noticed by modern botanists as occurring in Greece, though omitted by Sibthorp. It is at least certain that only one of the four named in the Flora Grceca, viz. the Acer campestre, can be identified with either of the varieties alluded to by Theophrastus, for mons- pessulanum seldom rises higher than a shrub, whilst 48 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. creticum and obtusifolium, if indeed they are different species, grow only in Crete and the Archipelago. According to this view, the Acer of Virgil would be the A. pseudo-platanus, or Sycamore of the mo- derns, and probably the Acer Gallicum is the same tree, for it is more common in France than in Italy, or in Greece, in which latter country, in- deed, Sibthorp does not appear to have remarked its presence. It grows sometimes to a great height, viz. 120 feet, so that it may be compared in this respect to the Lime. So many of the Maple tribe produce a timber, which from its variegation of colour might answer to Pliny's description of pavonia, that it is difficult to determine which was intended, but as the Nor- way, or red species, Acer platanoides , occurs more frequently in Greece and Italy, than our common Maple, A. campestre \ it is probable that this may be the one referred to by Pliny, and also perhaps by Ovid. F The Acer campestre, however, often presents in its roots that beautiful veined appearance, which Pliny notices under the names of bruscum and molluscum, and which was much prized in his day for the' leaves of tablets, and as a veneer for couches'. We have already seen that this quality is alluded to by Ovid. Cercis siliquastrum, or Judas-tree, is abundant in Greece and Northern Italy, and Fraas supposes • According to Fraas, Synopsis Plant., Fl. Class. Munchm, 1845. ' Lib. xvi. c. 27. ii.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 49 it to be mentioned by Theophrastus u under the name of ^Erj/ivda. For this, however, there ap- pears tq be no satisfactory evidence, as the ac- count given by the Greek writer seems not suf- ficiently descriptive. Cytisus laburnum is mentioned by Theophrastus x under the name of KoXovrea. Pliny7 speaks of a tree by the name Laburnum, but does not describe it in a manner to identify it with the tree now known by that name. Its flowers, he says, which no bee will ever touch, are a cubit in length. The latter may be intended to designate the length of the pendulous racemes of this tree, which is common, as he states, in the lower parts of the Alps. Amongst several trees belonging to the genus Crataegus, we may mention 1st, Crataegus Aria, or Mountain Ash, existing both in Italy and Greece, and probably described by Theophrastus under the name of aplaz. 2nd, Tormmalis, not a plant of Greece, but found in the south of Italy, and sup- posed to be noticed by Pliny a under that name, although no description is given by which we can identify it as such. The same uncertainty exists as to the other species of the same family, Crataegus oxyacantha, our Hawthorn, which is supposed to be the Spina alba of Columella, and by Dumolin, the 'Pa/^z/oy u H, PI. iii. 14. * Ibid., 17. * xvi. 31. * H. PJ. iii. 4. a Lib. xv. c. 23. E 50 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. of Theocritus. See this further described under that word. Pliny b says, that the flowers of the Spina are used for garlands, but perhaps he may refer to the Acanthus, rather than to the May. Cornus mascula, of Linnseus, is the Cornel of Eng- lish botanists. Theophrastus describes it under the name of Kpaveiac. Pliny d mentions the flavour of the fruit of the Cornel, Cornum, and in lib. xvi. 43 describes the latter as white at first, but afterwards becoming of the colour of blood. The Arbutus unedo, or Strawberry-tree of modern botanists, was common in ancient times, as it is at present, in Greece, and Italy. In the former country it went by the name of Kojmapo?. Theophrastus6 describes it as a tree not grow- ing to large dimensions, possessing an edible fruit, called /xe/xa/zcfAoz^, a smooth bark, and a leaf inter- mediate between the Oak and the Bay Laurel. Each blossom equals in size and form a long Myrtle blossom, so that it is formed like an egg-shell cut in half, kolXov coairep ozov eyKeKoXafAfievov. The fruit takes a year to ripen, so that it often is found on the tree at the time when the new buds make their appearance. It is supposed to be alluded to by Lucretius f, but Caspar Bauhin considers the tree there spoken of under the name of Arbutus to be the Vitis ideca, Vaccinium myrtillus. b Lib. xxi. c. 3!). '• II. PI. iii. 12. " Lib. xv. c. 31. ■ II. PI, iii. 15. f Lib. v. 939. ii.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 51 Pliny s confounds the fruit of the Arbutus with that of the Strawberry, remarking that it is the only known instance of a similar fruit growing upon a tree, and upon the ground. In other respects he follows Theophrastus, but admits that the fruit is not "worth eating." It was known to the Latins both by the name of TJnedo and of Arbutus. Dioscorides likens the tree to the Quince. Virgil alludes to it in Eclog. iii., and in his Geor- gics more than once, in the 2nd book applying to it the epithet horrida, which may either refer to the rough character belonging to its bark, or to the as- tringent nature of the tree in general. The other species of Arbutus, viz. Andrachne, a tree peculiarly of Greece, is, however, regarded by Sib thorp as the Kopapo? of Dioscorides. Yet Theophrastus speaks of a tree he calls av- Spaxvrj, or avftpayXri, like the KOfiapo? in its leaves and fruit, not of any great size, and with a bark smooth and peeling off, the latter a good charac- teristic of this species. Pliny h says, that the Portulaca (our Purslane) , an herbaceous plant, is called generally by the Greeks Jdrachne, but that his Adrachne, or as in another place1 he calls it, Andrachne, is a tree similar to the Arbutus in appearance, but with smaller leaves, and evergreen. He describes the bark as peeling off, as Theophrastus had done. s Lib. xv. c. 28. h Lib. xiii. c. 46. 5 Lib. xxiii. c. 103. E 2 52 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. The Flowering or Manna-bearing Ash may per- haps have been known to the ancients under the same name, as Virgil distinguishes between the Fraxinus and the Omus in his Georgicsj. Could the notion put forth by this Poet, of the possibility of grafting the Pear upon the Ash, have arisen from the profusion of white blossoms by which the Omus is distinguished ? " Ornusque incanuit albo Flore pyri." The two kinds of flowers are indeed different enough, but the beautiful bloom of white which covers the whole tree when in flower, might be confounded at a distance with that of the Pear. The property of exuding manna, however, which belongs to the Omus so common at present in Campania, does not appear to have been observed by the ancients. The common Ash, Fraxinus excelsior, was known to the Greeks under the name of /xeXla, and to the Latins by that of Fraxinus. Pliny k describes two varieties of Fraxinus, the one long and without knots, the other short, with a harder wood, a darker colour, and a leaf like a laurel. Some authors suppose these differences connected with their situation, stating that the Ash of the plains has a spotted wood, whilst that of the mountains is more compact. j Lib. ii. c. CG, ct scq. k Lib. xvi. c. 24. ii.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 53 He adds several fabulous statements as to the virtues of this tree and its leaves, especially as to its being an antidote to the bite of a serpent, and as to the antipathy existing between that reptile and the plant. Possibly Pliny's second variety may be Fraxinus heterophylla, a variety of the common Ash, with simple undivided leaves. Theophrastus distinguishes the fieXia and fiov- fieXla, the latter growing in Macedonia, and of great size. Perhaps the former may be the Omits, the latter the Fraxinus. Pliny notices also four varieties of Uhnus, or Elm, the 7rre\ea of the Greeks. Two of these were known, he says, to the Greeks, namely, the Moun- tain Elm, wThich is the larger of the two, and that of the plains, wdiich is the more shrubby. To the more lofty kinds Italy gives the name of Atinia. It does not, he says, produce that kind of seed- vessel which we call a samara, and which is charac- teristic of the genus. This, however, is a mistake, wdiich Columella corrects, and arose from the smaller size of the seed-vessel, which caused it to appear to casual observers to be wanting. The latter author regards the Atinia as synonymous to the Gallic Elm, of which Pliny makes his second variety, and he states that it is of larger dimensions than the Italian. Upon the whole, wTe may set it down as corresponding to our Wych Elm, or Ulmus montana. The Italian Elm, the third of Pliny's varieties of 54 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. Ulmus, has its leaves lying closer together, and springing in greater numbers from a single stalk. This may perhaps be Ulmas campestris, our common English Elm. The fourth variety he calls the Wild Elm, but does not describe it. It affords a curious illustration of the looseness of Pliny's classification, that he places the Elm intermediate between forest and fruit trees, because although it belongs to the former class by reason of its timber, it approaches to the latter in supporting more commonly than any other tree the branches and fruit of the Vine. Celtis australis, or Nettle-tree, a native of the Levant, is noticed by Dioscorides under the name of Acoto?. Pliny 1 speaks of it as a tree naturalized in Italy, and the description he gives of the fruit, which, he says, is about the size of a bean, its colour that of saffron, may refer to the berries of the Celtis, which are represented as sweet and wholesome in the south of Europe, and indeed in modern Greek, according to Sibthorp, are called honey-berries ; though it must be confessed the rest of his account applies better to the true Lotus of Egypt, which he describes afterwards with tolerable exactness. He seems to have been misled by the name Lotus, which had been applied to the tree, and to have transferred to it the description which he had re- ceived of the plant so designated in Egypt. 1 Lib. liii. C. 32. ii.] OF THE ANCIENTS, 55 Much need not be said of the Alder and the Willow. The former, the Alnus ghdinosa of X., the Alnus of the Latins, and the K\rj6pos of the Greeks, is noticed by Theophrastus and Pliny as a tree planted on the borders of rivers. Of the latter, Pliny m mentions several varieties, noticing their several uses for withies, wicker-work, panniers, chairs, &c, as at present. Fee and others have attempted to identify these with the varieties of Willow now recognised by botanists. The writers on agriculture, Cato, Columella, &c, point out the importance of Willow plantations, from the various uses to which the plant is applied. We next come to the Poplar, Pojndus of the Latins, cuyeipos of the Greeks, of which the ancients recognised only two, or at most three species. In Homer's Odyssey we read of alyeipo?*, the motion of the leaves of which is compared to the rapid twinkling of the ringers of the maids of Alcinous when plying their shuttles, — At S' larovs v. 38. ■ Lib. xxiv. c. 98. in.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 87 Greece. The Lotus of the Lotophagi, celebrated in the 9th Book of the Odyssey, — " Ta>v d' os tis \coro7o (fidyoi /zeAi^Sea Kapnov, Ovkct dnayyeWai ndXiu rj6e\ev ovde veeadai, AXX avrov (3ov\ovto per di>8pdo~i Aa>To(pdyoicriv Acorov iptnTopevoi pevep,ev, vocttqv re \a6eu6ai, — "Aud whoso tasted of their flowery meat Cared riot with tidings to return, but clave Fast to that tribe, for ever fain to eat, Reckless of home return, the tender Lotus sweet," — and dwelt upon by Tennyson in his beautiful poem of that name, seems to have been the Rhamnus lotus of Dec, called Nebek in Syria and Palestine, and still a favourite food amongst the Bedouins. But with regard to the other kinds of Lotus alluded to in ancient wTriters, I have only room to refer my readers to the elaborate discussion on the subject introduced by M. Fee into his Flore de Virgile. Acacia. In my " Lectures on Roman Husbandry a," I have noticed that the term Acanthus is sometimes applied to the Acacia ; a genus, however, which though noticed by Virgil, does not appear to have been ever naturalized in Italy, the Acacias now culti- vated in the south of Europe being derived from the New World. In Greece Acacia Farnesiana occurs, but it has been introduced in modern times. * p. 241. 88 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. Rosa. I have already alluded to the Rose in my " Lec- tures on Roman Husbandry V Rubus. Sibthorp mentions four species of Rubus as oc- curring in Greece, three of which, namely, R. ulceus, the Raspberry, R. ccesius, the Dewberry, and R. fruticosus, the common shrubby Bramble, are shrubby. They all went by the name of Baroy, but the Raspberry was distinguished by the epithet I8a?a. The same species exist in Italy, but only in mountainous situations in both countries. Pliny0 also mentions three varieties of Rubus, but one of them, which he calls ct/nosbatus, and which, he says, bears a flower like the Rose, is the Dog- rose. Another, which; he says, bears mulberries, is the Rubus fruticosus, which yields our common blackberries ; and the third, which derives its name from Mount Ida, where it principally grows, is our Raspberry. Dioscoridesd speaks of the Raspberry in much the same manner. Prunus. Four fruticose species are mentioned by Sib- thorp, but the only two which can be identified with ancient names are Pr. spinosa, the Sloe, and Pr. prostrata, a low shrub which covers the highest b p. 234. ' Lib. xvi. c. To. d Dc Hi. M. iv. 38. in.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 89 summits of Ida, Crete, Parnassus, &c. with its fo- liage, soon after the snow has disappeared. The Sloe is identified by Fraas with the ^ircoSta^ of Theophrastus6, and with the dyploKOKKVfirjXea of Dioscorides f ; the P. prostrata with the Chamw- cerasus of Pliny ; but Sibthorp is more cautious in both instances. The other two shrubby species do not appear to have been noticed. Pyrus domestica (Sib.), Sorbus domestica (Dec), our Service-tree, may have been alluded to by Theophrastus g under the name of 'Our;, of which bvov wTas the fruit. Virgil h speaks of a kind of cider being made from it : — " Ferrnento atque acidis imitantur vitea sorbis." By Pliny, Malus, Pomum, and Prunus are often used indiscriminately. See farther, under "Laurus." Amygdalus. Two dwarf Almonds, A. nana and incana, occur in Greece, but are not pointed out by ancient writers. Poterium. A shrubby species, P. spinosum, occurs on the dry hills of Greece and the Archipelago, near the sea, and is supposed by Sibthorp to be the Xroifirj of Dioscorides, a name which its present vernacular appellation, ' Acrrolfir] , confirms. The word ^Iroifir} also occurs in Theophrastus, and the corresponding one, Stobe, in Pliny. e Theoph. iii. 7. l Lib. i. c. 174. s Lib. iii. c. 12. h Georg. iii. 380. 90 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. Mespilus. Sibthorp enumerates four species of shrubs be- longing to this genus, regarding the M. pyracantha as the "0£voLKav6a of Dioscorides. The latter name, it is well known, has been appropriated by modern botanists to our White Thorn, the Spina alba of the Romans, as has been above alluded to. Pyrus. Four frutescent species are described by Sibthorp, none of which have been identified by him, but Fraas considers that one, viz. the P. salicifolia, which is the commonest of all in Greece, is in- tended by the ' A\pa$ of Theophrastus and Dios- corides, and it is now called a^Xabia; whilst an- other, the Pyrus aria, is conjectured to be the 'Ap la of Theophrastus l. Of the seven trees belonging to this genus, one, the Pyrus communis, our cultivated Pear-tree, was known to the Greeks under the name of o\v7) ; P. malus, the Apple, was the MrjXea or 'AypLopajXa of Dioscorides, by which latter name it is known at the present day in Greece ; P. cydonia, the Quince, was the Kvdoovia /xr/Aa of Theophrastus and Dios- corides. Tama nix. Tamarix Gallica is a shrub which occurs com- monly in Greece and Italy, and to which Pliny j 1 Lib. iii. c. 4. J Lib. xiii. 37 in.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 91 alludes under the name of Myrice, stating that some persons call it Tamarix ; but it is probable, as Fee says, that several species of Tamarisk were comprehended by the ancients under this title. Sibthorp has identified this plant with the Mvpl/tr/ of Dioscorides k ; Pliny, however, states that the Mi/rice is also known as the Urica, and this agrees pretty well with the drawing of the plant given in the Vienna MS. Dumolin concludes, that it was employed as a generic term for any kind of Heath, and was only applied to the Tamarisk because the ancients con- founded the latter with that description of shrub. PcIBES. Both the rough and smooth-skinned Gooseberry occur in the mountains of Greece (Sibthorp), and in addition to these the Black and Red Currant, and the R. petrceum or Rock Currant, in Italy ; but it is curious that no such plant has been noticed by the writers of antiquity, and the name itself is derived from an acidulous vegetable men- tioned by the Arabian physicians, and now believed to be a kind of Rhubarb. Bupleurum. Two shrubby species are noticed by Sibthorp in Greece, viz. B.fruticosum, and B. Sibthorpianiun, the former of which he identifies with the XeaeXc alOlo- ttlkov of Dioscorides. k Lib. i. c. 105. 92 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. Philadelphia. The Philadelphia coronarius is not noticed by Sib- thorp as occurring in Greece, but it grows in the north of Italy. It is called the Mock Orange, from its scent, but is not mentioned by Pliny or Theo- phrastus. The tyiXafteXtyov spoken of by Athenseus1 would seem to have been quite a different plant, so named from its branches inosculating so as to form one united and compact brotherhood, and thus to be well fitted for composing a stout hedge. This description certainly does not apply to the shrub referred to. Sempervivum. One arborescent species, S. arboreum, was found by Sibthorp in Cyprus, and this he has identified with the *Ae/£ft>o*> to fieya of Dioscorides. A much commoner species, however, Sempervivum tectorum, corresponds better with the description given by ancient writers of the latter plant. Theophrastus describes the aeifaov as a plant which continues ever juicy and green, has fleshy, smooth, long leaves, grows on the ground, and even on tiles — wherever, in short, the smallest quantity of soil exists for its roots to penetrate. Dioscorides speaks of three species of 'Aeltcoov, the largest an evergreen with fleshy leaves, at top pointed like a tongue, below concave, and with a stem a cubit in height ; it is found on the moun- tains as well as on the roofs of houses ; the second, 1 DeipnoiophistCBf lib. xv. c. 29. in.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 93 a smaller one, found on walls and rocks, with small round pointed leaves, and pale-green flowers ; a third kind, the one called by some avhpayvr), and by others Trj\e(piop, with small, thicker, and rough leaves. Pliny m also describes two kinds of Aizoum. The larger of these grows on the roofs of houses, exceeds a cubit in height, and is somewhat thicker than the thumb ; at the extremity bearing leaves which are in shape like a tongue, fleshy, full of juice, and about as broad as a person's thumb. Some are bent downwards to the ground, whilst others stand upright, in their outline resembling an eye in shape. Hence the name Buphthalmus sometimes applied to it. The smaller kind grows upon walls, old rubbish, and tiled roofs. Its leaves are narrow, pointed, and juicy, the stem a palm in height. It is evident that Pliny and Dioscorides refer to the same plant, and as the Sempervivum arboreum does not exist in Italy, and is rare even in Greece, the common Houseleek was the plant commonly in- tended under the name 'Aelfaov to peya, although it is quite possible that the former may have been sometimes confounded with it. Myrtus. The Myrtle, so luxuriant in Italy, and capable of cultivation even in our northern regions, seems to have been known from the earliest times. In fact, this plant, as well as the Pistachio-nut, have both m Lib. xxt. c. 102. 94 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. been found amongst the Tuffs of Mount Etna, which are anterior to the formation of the mountain itself. We, of course, assume, that the cultivated Myrtle was the plant commonly known as such at pre- sent, but the wild one may have been some plant of the Ruscus family, such as our Butcher's Broom, the Ruscus aculeatus of botanists, a plant of very different affinities, but sufficiently resembling the Myrtle in outward appearance to be confounded with it. Sibthorp notices the Myrtle as common in Greece, and identifies it with the Mvpalvr] of Dioscorides. The fruit, he says, is eaten by the modern, as it was by the ancient Athenians. Hedera. Our common Ivy abounds both in Greece and Italy. Theophrastus n mentions it under the name of kltto9, and Dioscorides under that of Kicrcro?, whilst Pliny0, who gives it the name of Udera, presents us with a long description of its several kinds, which corresponds in most respects with that given by Theophrastus. Both specify two kinds, male and female, each of which is subdivided into the White, the Black, and the Helix. It is probable that all these are varieties of our common Ivy, but it is difficult to identify the descriptions given by ancient writers with any of those recognised at present. The Helix, which they represent as barren, is ■ Hist. PI., iii. IV ° Lib. xvi. c. 02. in.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 95 only the trailing variety of the plant, which in that condition bears no fruit. The Black Ivy, Pliny states, sometimes bears a seed of a saffron colour, which is used for chap- lets, and is known as the Ivy of Nysa, in Syria. Now the variety with yellow berries, Royle tells us, is the one most common in the Himalayas, where it may be seen clinging to the rocks, and clasping the Oaks, so that we can readily believe the account given of Alexander in his Indian expe- dition having been crowned with it. Tournefort, in his "Travels in the Levant," informs us that the variety with the yellow berries is as common at Constantinople as the other kind. In Greece and Rome it was used to decorate the thyrsus of Bacchus, as commemorative of the march of the god through that country. Sambucus. Three species of Elder, or Sambucus, are noticed by Sibthorp as occurring in Greece, and the same number is found in Italy ; S. nigra and S. race- mosa being common to both ; S. ebulus found only in Greece, and S. laciniata in Italy — the latter, how- ever, is a variety of racemosa. Sibthorp identifies S. ebulus, or Dwarf Elder, with the Xa/maiaKTr) of Dioscorides ; and S. nigra, common Elder, with the aKTT) of that author. Pliny p says there are two kinds of Sambucus, p Lib. xxiv. c. 35. 96 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [LECT. one of which grows wild, and is much smaller than the other, and is called by the Greeks Chamce- acte or Helix. In iib. xvi. c< 42> he mentions ^ SambucuB as one of the best of trees for timber • and in lib. xv. c. 34, he alludes to the fruit of the Sam- bums as hanging upon stalks and branches united -the meaning of which is not very clear,-com- paring it in this respect to the Ivy. Theophrastus, however, enters more fully into a description of this plant*, describing it as thriving especially, but not exclusively, in watery places. This, then, is the larger kind of Elder noticed by anc.ent naturalists, including no doubt all the species indigenous in the south of Europe ex cepting the 8. ebulus, which is clearly pointed out by Dioscondes as a dwarf kind, resembling in its flowers and fruit the common one. To this Virgil, in his 10th Eclogue, plainly alludes, when he speaks of the Ebulus and its red berries :— "Pan, deus Arcadias, venit, quern vidimus ipsi Sanguinis ebuli baccia minioque rubentem." LONICERA. Although five species of Honeysuckle are no- ticed as occurring in Greece, and no less than nine m Italy, ,t is difficult to say by what names they wore recognised in ancient times. Pliny ' describes a plant called Clymenos, with leaves like the Ivy, numerous branches, and a < H. PI, i. 6, and iii. J 2. r Lib. xxy. c. 33. in.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 97 hollow stem, having a powerful smell and berries like those of the Ivy, growing in wild and moun- tainous countries. This may possibly be the Honeysuckle of modern botanists ; but the KAJ- ixevov and YlepLKXvjxevov of Dioscorides, Sibthorp is disposed to regard as the Convolvulus arvensis, and C. sepium, of modern botanists. Dumolin conjectures that a plant named AtyiAos by Theocritus was the Honeysuckle — Tcu fiev e'/zai Kvricruu re Kai Ai'yiAoi' aiyes edovn, Kai "2)(ivov nareovTi, Kai iv Kofxdpouri Ke^vurai s. ' For my goats browse upon the Cytisus and the iEgilos, aud feed upon the Schinus, and lie amongst the Comari.' This plant is also alluded to by Babrius in his Fables* as inhabiting the mountains. But the chief ground for identifying it with the Honeysuckle is that both plants are regarded as a favourite food for goats, whence our English Honeysuckle is called L. caprifolium. This, how- ever, seems scarcely sufficient to warrant the name being assigned to it. Scabiosa. One species, viz. S. pterocephala, occurring in Greece, is shrubby, but we are unable to refer to it any plant named by classical writers. Ernodea. The only shrub mentioned by Sibthorp in Greece as belonging to the Madder family is the Ernodea * Idyl. v. ver. 128. l Fab. iii. v. 3. H 98 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. montana, which is found amongst the mountains of Crete. It is the same as the Jsperula caldbrica of L., the Slier ardia foetida of Lamarck, but it cannot be identified with any classical plant. Conyza. Foul* shrubby species are noticed by Sibthorp, one of which, C. Candida, he suspects to be the "ApKTLov of Dioscorides. but the description given of the latter hardly bears out this conjecture. Santolina. Several species of this evergreen under-shrub are mentioned in Sibthorp as occurring in Greece, and one of them, Santolina maritima, is supposed by Sprengel to be the Gnaphalium chamcezelon of Pliny u, which he describes as having soft white leaves, and as being used as flocks for beds. Sibthorp speaks doubtfully as to its being the Tvatydkiov of Dios- corides. Santolina chamcecyparissus is a common shrub in Italy, often met with in our gardens under the name of Lavender Cotton. Dumolin endeavours to identify this plant with the HoKiov of Theophrastus v and Dioscorides x, and the Polion of Pliny y. Artemisia. Of this Sibthorp mentions one frutescent species only as occurring in Greece, namely, A. arborescens, u Lib. xxvii. 61, v Lib. i. c. 10. ■ Lib. iii. c. 114. f Lib. xxi. c. 20, 21, 84. in.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 99 the apTe/jucria of Dioscorides. Manetti enumerates two in Italy, viz. Abrotanum and Santonica. Pliny z also specifies two, the Santonica and the Pontica, both superior, he says, to the Italian. They were used, as at present, as a stomachic in- fused in wine, for which purpose Apicius intro- duces the plant into the materials for a banquet, recommending it to be procured from Camerina, or else from Pontus a. Theophrastus and Dioscorides call it a\\riv6iov, and both represent the Pontic as the best. Senecio. Sibthorp mentions one shrubby species of this genus, namely, S.fruticulosus, but it is not noticed by Manetti as occurring in Italy. It is, however, improbable, that this species is alluded to in any ancient writer. Pliny b says, that the plant called 'Hpiyepov by the Greeks is the Senecio of the Romans, both words having reference to the hoary appearance of the head of flowers when they begin to seed. It has the appearance, he says, and the softness of Trixago or Chamcedri/s, a plant which has been identified with the Teucrium chamcedrys of modern botanists. It has small reddish-coloured stems, and is found growing on walls and on the tiled roofs of houses. Its name is derived from rjp, 1 Lib. xxvii. c. 28. * Dierbach, Flora Jpiciana, Heidelberg, 1831. b Lib. xxv. c. 106. H 2 100 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. spring, and yepcov, aged, because it is white in the spring. Its head is divided into a number of downy filaments {Spina) protruding like a thistle ; hence it is called by Callimachus Acanthus, and by others Pappus. This description agrees very well with some of the herbaceous sorts of Senecio, such as our common Groundsel, except as to its turning white, or going to seed, in the spring. It must be recollected, however, that in warm climates, like Greece, it would come to seed earlier than with us. Gnaphalium. Two species of shrubby plants belonging to this genus are mentioned by Sibthorp, the best known of which is G. staechas, also called Helichrysum stoe- chas, which occurs both in Greece and in Italy. In Greece at present this plant is known by the name of afxapavOov (everlasting), one of those which Dioscorides assigned to it. This author states, that it is synonymous with 'KXi^pvaov and Xpvo-av- Oepiov, both expressive of the yellow colour of its. petals ; adding, that it is used for chaplets, has a small yellowish white stem, erect and stout, leaves scattered like the ' ' Afiporovov, a blossom {KOfxrjv) orbicular, of a golden yellow colour, spreading out in all directions like a parasol, and bearing a re- semblance to dry clusters of flowers, together with a slender root. Theophrastus states that it has golden-coloured in.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 101 flowers, a whitish leaf, a white hard stem, and a superficial thin root. The description given by Pliny I omit, as it is much the same as those above given, though less exact than that of Dioscorides. We may, therefore, admit that Gnaphalium stoechas was at least one of the plants designated by the name of everlasting, and that it corresponded with the Helichrfjsum of Pliny. The latter, however, must not be confounded with the 'EAecoxpvcros' of Theophrastus c, or with the Heliochrysos of Pliny d. Both these are wild meadow-plants, flowering in the spring, and Theophrastus associates the one he names with that species of Anemone which he calls limonia. Hence Dumolin with reason conjectures, that it may have been the Caltha palustris of our meadows. St^ehelina. Two frutescent species are noticed by Sibthorp, but neither can be identified with ancient names, although the plant he calls Pteronia clwmwpeuce, which other botanists consider as a Stceheltna, may perhaps be the one designated by Dioscorides e by the name of yaiiouTrevKr). Centaurea. Amongst the twenty species of Centaury enu- merated by Sibthorp, one only, viz. 0. spinosa, is c Lib. vi. c. 7. d Lib. xxi. c. 38. * Lib. iv. c. 125. 102 THE TREES AND SHRUBS, &c. [lect. hi. frutescent. This one, however, does not figure in Manetti's Catalogue. Three kinds of Centaury are mentioned by Pliny f. The larger, called Chironium, as being believed to be the plant by which the Centaur Chiron was cured, has been identified by the older botanists with the Centaur ea Centaurium of L., but it seems to me quite uncertain to which particular plants this and the other two kinds alluded to by Pliny refer. Cineraria. Sibthorp mentions one shrubby species in Greece, viz. maritima, but does not identify it with any ancient name. The same also occurs in Italy, but we are unable to point to any plant noticed by the writers of antiquity with which it can be referred. f Lib. xxv. c. 30. LECTUKE IV. SHRUBS OF GREECE AND ITALY BELONGING TO THE FOLLOWING GENERA:— erica rhododendron azalea vaccinium ligustrum phillyrea jasminum conyolyulus lithosper- mum onosma — origanum teucrium periploca — solanum lycium yerbascum phlomis rosmarinus satureia— lavandula salyia thymus — molucella prasium — stachys — yitex — salsola — salicornia — atriplex polygonum laurus daphne — passerina — osyris el.eagnus aristolochia — euphorbia — buxus — ephedra — asparagus — aloe — ruscus — smilax. eemarks on the decay of species. concluding ob- servations. Erica. CIBTHORP enumerates six species of Heaths, including that now called Calluna vulgaris, as occurring in Greece, and the same species are common in Italy. Of these he identifies one, viz. the herbacea or carnea, with the ipeiKT) of Dios- corides, but it is probable that all the kinds of Heath observed were included by the latter under this denomination. This author describes his ipelKrj as a shrubby or bushy tree like the Tamarisk (fivpiKT]), but much smaller, remarking that the honey which bees suck from its flower is far from good. It seems probable, as has been already stated under the head of Tamarisk, that the word MvpUrj was often applied to the larger kinds of Heaths, 1(U THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. such as the Erica arbor ea, and that the Myrica of Virgil may merely indicate Heather, although the absence of the Ulex europceus from Sicily (Gussone) forbids us to extend the same to the fivpUr] of Theocritus. Rhododendron and Azalea. The Rhododendron does not occur in Greece, but is common on the borders of the Euxine, and has been supposed to communicate those noxious properties to the honey of that country, of which Xenophona speaks. Pliny b also seems to indicate, that it produces madness in those who partake of it : stating that this property is attributable to the flowers of a plant he calls Rhododendron, which the bees frequent. In the preceding chapter, however, having first mentioned that at Heraclea, in Pontus, the honey is very poisonous, he goes on in the succeeding paragraph to give it as his opinion, that the poison is extracted from a plant found in that country, called " cegolethron" because it is fatal to beasts of burden, and to goats in particular. The word " Rhododendron" however, Pliny, in lib. xvi. c. 33, uses as an equivalent to the " Nerium" or Rhododaphne, which he describes as an ever- green, bearing a near resemblance to the Rose, throwing out numerous branches from the stem, and to brutes poisonous, although to man an anti- dote against the venom of serpents. Now this latter ' Anabasis, iv. 3, b Lib. xxi. c. 45. iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 105 term, and the corresponding one, Nrjpiov or *Po5o- §ev8pov of Dioscorides, are identified by Sib thorp with the Nerium oleander, a very common shrub in Greece, as well as in most parts of the south of Europe, so that Pliny must have confounded these two plants. It has been generally supposed that the one which rendered the honey of Pontus noxious wras the Rhododendron ponticum ; this, how- ever, is entirely harmless, and the shrub really intended must have been the Azalea pontica, the Chamcerhododendros of Tournefort c, which has the reputation at present of rendering honey narcotic, and of poisoning the goats, swine, and sheep that browze upon its leaves d. Vaccinium. I have alluded in my "Roman Husbandry6" to the probability that the Vaccinium of the ancients was not the same plant as the Bilberry, or the Vaccinium myrtillus, of the present day, but the Hyacinth. Fee combats this opinion f, but is driven to suppose that the Greeks recognised two Hyacinths, the first red, the Lilium martagon of L. ; the second black, which was the Vaccinium myr- tillus. The latter, however, does not grow in watery places, which Pliny says is the case with the Vac- cinium. Theophrastus seems to refer to the Bil- berryg, under the name of afjLTreXos rrj? 'ISrj?, but (! Voyage au Levant, vol. ii. p. 226. d See also "Bot. Magazine," p. 433. e p. 26G. f Fl. Virg. e H. pi. iil. 17. 106 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. Sibthorp, who notices the V. myrtillus as occurring in the mountains of Bithynia, does not identify it with any of the plants mentioned by Dioscorides. LlGUSTRUM. The Ligustrum vulgare, or Privet, is a common shrub both in Greece and Italy, but I have pointed outh that there is reason to doubt, whether the Ligustrum of Virgil does not mean a different plant, although it probably was intended by Pliny and Columella to indicate the one now commonly known by that name. Phillyrea. Two species are noticed by Sibthorp, and four by Manetti. Of these the latifolia, as has been already stated, is identified with the (ptXXvpea of Dioscorides ; but it is not probable that the other species were distinguished from it. Jasminum. Although the common Jasmine, Jasminum offici- nale, is so abundant in most parts of Europe, and especially in Greece and the Levant, it does not appear to have been known to the ancients, and its native country is probably Arabia, from which, according to Forskahl1, its name is derived. Convolvulus. Three shrubby species are mentioned by Sib- thorp ; and one, C. cncorum, is noticed by Manetti. 11 Roman Husbandry, p. 239. ' Fl. JEgypt, .imh.y v. no. iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 107 But it is probable tbat the plant alluded to by Pliny under the name of Convolvulus, and compared by him to a Lily, is one of the common herbaceous species, perhaps C. septum, which Dioscorides says winds round trees, and in summer forms entire arbours. He calls it oyxZAaf Xela. LlTHOSPERMUM. Two shrubby species are noticed by Sibthorp, viz. L. fruticosum and hispidulum, but in Italy they appear all to be herbaceous. Pliny k and Dios- corides l both speak of a plant called in Latin Lithospermum, and in Greek AiOocnrep/jLov, from the hard, stonv character of its seeds. It has been suggested that the description agrees better with Coix lachryma, but as this is an Indian plant, it will be safer to adhere to the common opinion, that it is one or other of the species of Lithospermum, found in Italy and Greece, though which of them the descriptions of these writers is not sufficiently precise to enable us to pronounce. Onosma. Sibthorp mentions a shrubby species of this genus under the name of 0. frutlcosa. The old botanists have given to this genus the name applied by Pliny m to a plant which he de- scribes too concisely to admit of identification. Nor does Dioscorides" assist us further, in speaking of the same plant under the Greek name of ' Ovoo-jxa. k Lib. xxvii. c. 74. ' M. M. iii. 148. ■ Lib. xxvii. c. 86. " M. M. iii. 137. 108 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. Origanum. Sibthorp only specifies two shrubby species, viz. Tournefortii and Dictamnus. The latter is the AUra/jn'os' of Dioscorides, but it is probable that they were both confounded with the other kinds of Origanum, which appear to have had the same name in ancient times as at present, viz. 'Opiyavov, corrupted in modern Greek to piyavi. Origanum majorana, a common species in Italy, seems to have been distinguished by the name Amaracus by the Romans, and ^d/xyjrvxov by the Greeks. See "Roman Husbandry," p. 272, where by mistake the word lampsana is substituted for sampsucum. Teucrium. Ten shrubby species are enumerated by Sibthorp, none of which are included in Manetti's list. Teucrium flavum has been supposed to be alluded to by Dioscorides0 under the name of TevKplov, which, he says, is also called Xafialdpv?, as this plant goes by the name of xafxaibpva at the pre- sent day. Teucrium polium is supposed to be the Ylokiov of Dioscorides11, and the Folium of Pliny q, who describes one kind from the mountains as a shrub a cubit high, white, having a head of flowers on the top of a corymb like grey hair, with a heavy but not disagreeable smell ; and the other larger, with not so powerful an odour, and inferior • iii. 111. '' iii. 121. « wi. 21. iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 109 in medicinal efficacy. The smaller Polium may be Teucrium montanum ; the larger one T. polium. I have, however, already pointed out that Du- molin maintains that the YloXiov of the Greeks, and the Polium alluded to by Pliny, was the Santo- lina chamcecyparissus of modern botanists. Periploca. Periploca grceca is a native of Bithynia and Mount Athos, and occurs also in Italy, but it was probably confounded with other climbing plants — Clematis, Bryony, &c. — by the ancient writers, as there are no remarkable qualities by which their attention would be directed towards it. Solanum. Of the three species of Nightshade observed by Sibthorp in Greece, the S. dulcamara is a climber, S. nigrum -,an annual, and the third, S. sodomeum, a shrub. The first and second are common also in Italy. S. sodomeum, found by Sibthorp in Sicily, of which a splendid figure is given in the Flora Grceca, is a native of Africa and Syria. It obtained its name from being regarded as the plant which Hasselquist had identified with that bearing the famous apples of Sodom, described by Josephus and by Tacitus as fair to the eye, but wThen plucked, dissolving into dust and ashes r. r In the Book of Wisdom, x. 7, we read, " Of whose wickedness even in this day the waste land that smoketh is a testimony, and plants bearing fruit that never came to ripeness." 110 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. But for this identification, Sib thorp must be re- garded as an insufficient authority, as he never visited the Holy Land, and the species commonly met with at the Dead Sea, is the Solarium coagulans of Linnseus, the Sanctum of Forskahl, and the Hiero- chunticum of Dunal, described by the latter in De- candolle's Prodromus. Robinson, therefore, in his "Biblical Researches8," appears to be mistaken in naming it the S. melongena, a name given by modern botanists to a whole section of the Solanece, and not to the particular species which represents the true apple of Sodom ; nor does he seem warranted in adopting the suggestion originally thrown out by Seetzen \ that the latter plant was an Asclepias. It is true, that the Asclepias gigantea or procera, the 0 slier of the Arabs, is found in a few places on the borders of the Dead Sea, and its fruit when opened contains nothing but a dusty powder. Ac- cording to Robinson, too u, it resembles a large smooth apple or orange, hanging in clusters of three or four together, and when ripe of a yellow colour ; if so, differing greatly from other mem- bers of the Asclepias tribe, whose seed-vessel cer- tainly bears no sort of resemblance to either of these fruits. But I am assured on good authority, that the Asclepias alluded to is an extremely rare plant in • Vol. i. p. 522. 1 See Kitto'fl "Physical History of the Holy Land." ■ See Robinson's "Physical Geography of the Holy Land," 18C5, p. 216. iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. Ill that locality, whilst the Solanum is very common ; and the interior of the Apple of the Solanum just mentioned is likewise, it is said, frequently con- verted into a powder like dust, through the punc- ture of an insect x. Upon the whole, then, I am inclined to adhere to the older notion that the latter was the plant intended. Pliny7 says, that the Solanum is the same as the Strychnon or Trychnon, which latter he describes as rather a woolly shrub than a herb, with large follicles, broad and turbinated, and a good-sized berry within, ripening in November. This would seem to be the Physalis alkekengi. Another kind of Strychnon he calls halicacabum : one variety of which possesses, he says, narcotic qualities, and produces death more speedily than Opium ; whilst another is esteemed as an article of food. As to the first variety, which species of Solanum, or of the allied genera Jtropa and Mandragora, was intended, must be open to doubt, for the Atropa belladonna, which is a very rare plant in Greece, and not noticed by Sibthorp, seems to be men- tioned by Theophrastus z under the name of Ma*>- Spayopas, and described as having a lofty stem like the vapOrj^ Ferula communis : so that the 1 The berry of the S. sodomeum Sibthorp describes as, " Intus viscida, amara, nauseosa, demum pulverulenta, sicca, friabilis, unde, ut videtur, nomen specificum." y Lib. xxi. 105. z H. PI. vi. 2. 112 THE TREES AND SHRUBS Tlect. L liavftpayopa of this author would differ from that of Dioscorides, which is the true Mandrake a. The edible variety may be one of that section of the Solarium tribe, distinguished by the name of Melongena, to which belongs the Aubergine, now a common article of food in the southern parts of Europe. Lyctum. Two species of this climbing shrub, viz. L. bar- barum and L. europeum, are mentioned by Sibthorp, who identifies the latter with the 'Pd/nvo? of Dios- corides. This, however, does not seem consistent with the opinion he expresses, as already stated under the head of Rhamnus, that the Avklov of Dioscorides was extracted from the Rhamnus in- fectorius. Although not adopting this conclusion, I cannot identify the modern Lycium with the Ltjcium of the ancients, as the former is wholly destitute of any medicinal virtues. Verbascum. One species, viz. V. spinosum, is mentioned by Sibthorp as occurring in mountainous places in Crete. This, however, cannot be supposed to have been distinguished by the ancients from the herbaceous species which abound in Greece. To these the term 0Ao/^O9 is applied in the Romaic ; and this alone would lead us to infer that the (JjAo/jlo? mentioned by Dioscorides b, of which he ■ See " Roman Husbandly," p. 274. b iv. 103. iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 113 notices two kinds, white and black, was this plant. Now Pliny c informs us, that the (f)Xofio^ of the Greeks was the Verbascum of the Romans. It wTas not without reason, therefore, that the old botanists gave this latter name to our common Mullein. Phlomis. Three species of Phlomis are mentioned by Sib- thorp as occurring in Greece, but of these only one, P. fruticosa, is a shrub. It is identified by Sibthorp wTith the (pAofio? aypla of Dioscorides d, which, therefore, would be a different plant from either of the two kinds mentioned above, and re- ferred to Verbascum. It may be the Phlomis of Pliny e, which he distinguishes from Phlomus above noticed. The Roman naturalist describes two varieties, both being hairy plants with rounded leaves, and but slightly elevated above the ground. It is very doubtful, however, whether this be a true iden- tification. Rosmarinus. The common Rosemary, Rosmarinus officinalis, is noticed by Sibthorp as occurring in a few places in Greece, and it is met with likewise in Italy. We might expect, therefore, to see it noticed by ancient writers, and Sibthorp considers that it is the KifiavcDTis of the ancient Greeks, as it is known c Lib. xxviii. c. 13. d Lib. iv. 101. e Lib. xxv. 73. I 114 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. by the name of AevftpoXifiavov at the present day. Pliny describes the Libanotis, also, as he says, called Rosmarhium, as having a root like to that of the Olusatrum, and a smell nowise differing from frank- incense ; Virgil, Horace, and Ovid, all speak of it, the first under the name of Ros, the two latter under that of Rosmarinum. Columella f says that it is a good food for bees. Satureia. Five species of Savory occurring in Greece rise to the height of a shrub, but of these one only extends to Italy, viz. S. montana. S. Thymbra is identified with the Thymbra of Pliny, and the Qvfxfipa of Dioscorides ; it is a favourite plant with the bees, and grows on Hymettus along with another fruticose species of the same genus, viz. S. capitatag, the Qvfios of Dioscorides, which is traceable in the modern term Qv/mo or Ovfiapc. Lavandula. Three species of Lavender are noted by Sibthorp, all three low shrubs, and in Italy one only, namely, L. spica. Pliny mentions a herb called Stoechas h : describing it as an odoriferous plant, with leaves like the Hyssop, and with a bitter taste. Diosco- rides speaks of it under the name of (rrolxa?, and Sibthorp identities this with the L. stoeclias which he describes. From its abundance on the 1 ix 4. * Sibthorp. '' Lib. xxvi. c. 27, aixl xxvii. 107. iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 115 islands near Hieres, in France, the latter were called by the ancients Stoechades. The word Lavan- dula does not occur in any Classical writer. Salvia. Sibthorp enumerates no less than twenty species of Salvia, of which, however, only three are shrubs, viz. S. officinalis \ pomifera, and calycina. In Italy the only shrubby species is S. officinalis. This is identified by Sibthorp with the iXeXiatyoiKov of Dioscorides, described by him in the 3rd Book of his M. Mj, and by Pliny ^ as possessing a power- ful smell ; adding, that it is considered to be the same as his Salvia, a plant like to Mint in appear- ance, white and aromatic. I have already pointed out the probability of M. Dumolin's suggestion, that the Salvia sclarea, or Clary, of the moderns is the Baccharis of the ancients \ Thymus. Eleven frutescent species are noticed by Sib- thorp, but those alluded to in ancient writers were chiefly the common herbaceous kinds, which are so abundant in the southern parts of Europe. Thymus vulgaris seems to have been known by the name of Qv/jlov in Greek, and Thymus in Latin ; Thymus serpyllum denoted by that of ep7rv\\os ' Walpole's Memoirs, vol. i. p. 246. j c. 38. k Lib. xxii. c. 71. ' Roman Husb., p, 280. I 2 116 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. by Theophrastus m, and Serpyllum (a serpendo) by Pliny n. Thymus zygis, Sibtb., one of his frutescent species, is so called from being supposed to be the Zvyi? of Dioscorides °, which he distinguishes from Ep- ttvXXov by its greater size, and which, as it grows in mountainous regions, he calls Wild Thyme. Aeynos graveolens, the Thymus graveolens of L., is supposed by Fraas to be the Tpayoplyavov of Dioscorides p. Molucella. One frutescent species is noticed by Sibthorp, but it seems impossible to identify it with any ancient plant. It is, indeed, of rather local oc- currence, namely, in Cyprus. Though not noticed by Manetti, it is met with in some parts of Italy. Prasium. The same remark applies to that genus, of which P. majus, noticed by Sibthorp in the Peloponnesus, the coasts of Caria, and Zante, is frutescent. Stachys. Three shrubby species are mentioned as oc- curring in Greece, but it seems difficult to refer them to any plants noticed by the ancients, al- though Sibthorp has identified the commonest, viz. S. palcestina, with the ILtolxvs of Dioscorides. The latter, indeed, is the name of a shrub men- ■ vi. 2. " xx. 90. ■ iii. 40. «■ iii. 35. iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 117 tioned by Dioscorides q, resembling the YlpaaLov, but larger, bearing numerous hairy leaves, hard, fragrant, white, and many shoots issuing from the root, whiter than those of the YlpacrLov. It in- habits high mountains. Now the Ylpdaiov is re- garded as a species of Marrubium, either vulgar e or creticum. Pliny also mentions a herb called StacJiys, which he compares to a leek, but this is probably an error, as in other respects his descrip- tion, so far as it goes, agrees with that of Dios- corides. Stachys germanica, a very common plant in Italy, may possibly have as much claim to be regarded as the plant intended as S.palcestina. VlTEX. Vitex Agnus castus is one of the commonest shrubs in Greece, and was known of old by the Greek name ayvos, and in earlier writers by that of Avyos. The name of Agnus castus, Pliny1' says, was given to it from the habit of the matrons of Athens to strew their beds with it during the festival of the Thesmophora, when the strictest chastity was en- joined. He mentions two kinds, the larger, called the white, bearing a white blossom mixed with purple, the smaller with a paler, downy leaf, and a flower entirely purple. Two varieties are also noticed by modern botan- ists, one having white flowers, the other purple i iii. 120. r Lib. xxiv. c. 38. 118 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. ones. Though in general a shrub, it sometimes rises to the height of ten feet, and Hasselquist observes that pilgrims make staves of it. Salsola and Salicornia. One shrubby species of each of these genera is noticed by Sibthorp as occurring on the sea-coast, near Athens, but neither of them has been iden- tified with any plant named by classical writers. Atriplex. Four shrubby species are noticed by Sibthorp in Greece, and two by Manetti in Italy. One of them, A. halimus, which has established itself on many parts of our own sea-coasts, obtained its specific name from the olXliaos of Dioscorides s, which from his description seems to have been meant for this shrub. Some have regarded it as the Batis marina, Pliny1, but the description the Roman naturalist gives of Alimon u, seems to identify it with that plant, which he calls a shrub, dense, white, without thorns, wTith leaves like the Olive, but softer. I am not aware, however, that the Atriplex halimus is ever eaten, and therefore Fee's conjecture may be well founded, that it is the Atriplex portulacoides, the young leaves and shoots of which, preserved in vinegar, have, he says, an agreeable taste. ■ M. M. i. 120. ' xxi. 50. u xxii. 33. iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 119 The 'Arpacpaiji? of the Greek writers appears to have been the Garden Orach, A. hortensis, an herba- ceous species. Polygonum. Two species of shrubby Polygonum are noticed by Sibthorp, but neither can be identified with any ancient plants. Laurus and Daphne. The term Laurus was employed by the ancients with the same degree of laxity as that in which they indulged in the case of the Acanthus, the Acer, and the like, just as that, with regard to the same term, which is admitted into the popular phraseology of the present day. We speak of the common Laurel, the Bay, the Portugal, the Alexandrian, the Laurustinus, &c, shrubs no farther related than in the one character of being evergreen shrubs, applicable to the same uses in ornamental gardening. In like manner Pliny enumerates the tinus, a plant which must have been the Viburnum tinus, the Laurustinus of the moderns, belonging to the family Caprifoliacece, (although some, even in his time, considered this as a tree of a separate class). Then follows the Royal Laurel, sacred to Apollo, and known as the Augustan, being used in triumphs to encircle the brow of the conqueror, which is the Bay, or Laurus nobilis of Linnaeus, belonging to the family of Laurinece, and possessing something 1^20 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. of the aroma so remarkable in certain tropical species of the same family, namely, in the Cinna- mon and Cassia, plants noticed by Theophrastus and Pliny v, but not as occurring in Europe. The Bay Laurel itself has been regarded by some as a questionable native of Europe, and even Pliny seems to speak of it as though it were of foreign extraction, when he alludes to the care with which it was preserved, as was the case in the villa of the Caesars x. But this was an exceptional case, arising from the veneration felt for that particular branch of Laurel, which, as the story goes, was held in the beak of the hen, that an eagle had let fall from a loft unhurt into the lap of the Empress Livia ; and at any rate the discovery of this plant amongst the Tuffs of Castelnau, in Provence, as stated by M. Planchon in a late work on the subject, proves that it existed antecedently to man in the south of France. The crackling which takes place when the leaves are put into the fire, arising from its oil becoming volatilized, and bursting the walls of the cells within which it had been imprisoned, was regarded by the Romans with superstitious fear, and deterred them from applying the shrub to profane purposes, or even from using it for fires at the altars. See Pliny, lib. xv. 40. The Bay was called the barren Laurel, as the male and female flowers are on separate trees. T Lib. xv. c. 39. ' Pliny, lib. xv. c. )<». iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 121 Sibthorp identifies it with the Ad(f)i>ri of Dios- corides, but the plant now known as Daphne is the D. lanreola) or Spurge Laurel, which is pro- bably the species called by Pliny Daphnoides. Of Daphne Sibthorp mentions thirteen frutescent species, but the D. laureola does not occur amongst them. Fraas, however, has identified his first species, viz. D. Tartonraira, with the Kveoopo? 6 XevKo? of Theophrastus1, both because it flowers at the autumnal equinox, and also because it has a leaf which is white and thick-skinned or hard (Sep/jLdTcoSes), in contradistinction to the black kind, the leaf of which is fleshy. The former is fragrant, the latter destitute of smell. Daphne Gnidium, the same author contends, is not the Y^vewpov pceXav of Theophrastus, for this has neither fleshy leaves, nor fragrant leaves. He considers it the Casia herba of Virg. z, now called Kavcra in Eubcea, and the Sv/uLeXaca of Dioscorides a, which Sibthorp also regards it. Daphne oleoides, or Jasminea, Sibth., is the Xa/xa/Aea of Dioscorides b and of Pliny. The Kvecopov fxeXav he considers to have been the Passerina hirsuta of Sibthorp. Another variety of Lauras is called by Pliny c taza, and is described by him as having a small excrescence sprouting from the middle of the leaf, and forming a fringe, as it were, hanging from it. Now this description applies so well to the Ruscus hypoglossum of modern botanists, that we should y vi. 2. z Georg. ii. 213; Eclog. ii. 49. a iv. 170. b iv. 169. e xv. 34. 122 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. be inclined to identify the two plants ; but it is re- markable, that Pliny afterwards states that another so-called Laurel, namely, the Alexandrian, by some termed the Idoean, is also designated by the name oihypoglottion, whilst Dioscorides describes the plant he calls 'ldala P/£a, as having leaves like the wild Myrtle, and upon them small twisted appendages (eA^eey), from which the flower issues. Pliny, too, in his 27th book, c. 67, speaks of the Hypoglottion exactly in the same terms as Dios- corides, but he just afterwards alludes to the Idaean plant, as though it were distinct from the former. In another place Dioscorides mentions the Alex- andrian Laurel as synonymous to the Chamce daphne, and describes it as having its fruit placed in the middle of the leaf, a description which would apply to the R. hypophyllum of Linnaeus, which has a flower springing from the centre of the leaf like the B. hypoglottion, but is destitute of that tongue- shaped bractea which is characteristic of the latter. From the circumstance of the fruit growing from the leaf, the Alexandrian Laurel is called by Pliny carpophyllum. Nevertheless others have preferred to identify the Alexandrian Laurel with the Rnscus racemosns, although in that species the flowers do not spring from the leaf as in the two other species. Perhaps, if we believe that the ancients really distinguished these three species of lluscus, we may be disposed to believe with Sibthorp, that the Aar] 'AAeijdvdpeia of Dioscorides was the iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 123 R. hypoglottion, XafiaLdacfrvT] the R. liypophyllum, Nlvpalvrj dypta the R. aculeatus. An old botanist of the sixteenth century, Fabius Colonna, in his work entitled <$>vTof3acrai>o¥, Neapoli, 1592, first pointed out the resemblance between the Radix Iclcea and the Rascus Iiypoglossum, of which latter he gives a correct drawing. Other varieties are also mentioned, which it is not easy to identify, but amongst them does not occur that which is the commonest of any at the present day, using the term Laurel in its popular sense, namely, the Cerasus laurocerasus, or Laurel Cherry, this appearing to have been unknown to the ancients, having been introduced into Europe from Trebizond in 1576, by Clusius, under diffi- culties nearly as great as those stated in page 34, with respect to the Cedar of Lebanon d. Osyris. This Osyris alba is common in the south of Europe, and is noticed by Sibthorp as occurring in Greece. It is probably described by Dioscoridese under the name of oavpL?, and by Pliny f under that of Osyris. It has been considered the casia of the Poets, but this, as we have seen, was more probably Daphne gnidium. El,eagnus. Elceagnus angustifolia is mentioned by Sibthorp amongst the shrubs indigenous in Greece, and d See Loudon's Arboretum, vol. ii. p. 717. « M.M. iv. 141. f Lib. xxvii. c. 88. 124 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. as occurring in Samos, and in Asia Minor, between Brusa and Smyrna. Sibthorp regards it as the eXaia aiQioiriKr] of Dioscorides, but Fraas questions this identification. The kXaiayvos of Theophrastus was a marsh plant, and either the Myrica gale, or the Salix babylonica. Aristolochia. Two shrubby species are noticed by Sibthorp in Greece, viz. A. semper vir ens and boetica, one also, A. sipho, by Manetti, in Italy. A. boetica is identified by Sibthorp with the ' ApLarroXoyjia KXruxarlTis of Dioscorides, a term which the older botanists had transferred to the herbaceous species met with in Great Britain. Pliny g mentions several kinds of Aristolochia which had the same virtues attributed to them as the vulgar at present assign to the various kinds of Birthwort, included under the same de- nomination. It does not seem possible, however, to identify the kinds mentioned by Pliny with those known in modern times ; and the notices contained in Theophrastus and in Dioscorides of * hpicrroXoyia are still less precise. Euphorbia. Six shrubby species are mentioned by Sibthorp, and one by Manetti in Italy. Pliny h gives a description of a plant he calls Euphorbia, which corresponds very well with the « Lib. \xv. c. o4. h Lib. \w. c. 38. iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 125 general characters of the genus known by that name ; and in lib. xxvi. c. 39, he describes various kinds of Titht/malus, which from the name of milk- plant, as well as from other properties ascribed to it, seems to be rightly identified with our Euphorbias. The same word, viz. Tt@vp,a\o?, or T^/xaAAoy, occurs in Theophrastus and Dioscorides, and various sorts are mentioned by those writers which may with greater or less probability be referred to par- ticular species of this genus. But of the frutescent species the only two that can be identified are — 1st. E. characias, which seems to be the TlOv/jlocXo? apprjv, Th., yapaKias, Dios. ; and the E. dendroides, a plant introduced from the East, which is the TlOv/jlclXo? SevdpcoST]? of Dioscorides. Sibthorp states, that the word riOvpiaXco is given to the Euphorbia by the Greeks at present ; Fraas, however, says that he never heard that name ap- plied to the plant during his visit in the country. Buxus. Pliny notices three varieties of Buxus. The Gallic, which is trained to shoot upwards in a pyramidal form, and attains a considerable height, is no doubt the Buxus sempervirens, or the common Box of this country ; but the second, which, he says, is worthless as wood, and emits a disagreeable odour, cannot so well be identified ; and the third, known as the Italian Box, is more spreading than the others, and forms a thick hedge. It is pro- bably the dwarf variety of our common Box. 126 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. But Pliny would seem to have confounded under this name both the Buxus sempervirens and halearica of modern botanists ; for whilst his general descrip- tion agrees with the former, his statement that the trunks of largest size grow in Corsica would lead us to suppose that he had in view the latter. Hawkins found the Buxus sempervirens on M. Pindus and in Albania, and Grisebach in Ma- cedonia and Rumelia, It is known by the name of HvijdpL at present, so that it is identified with the TIv^o? of Theophrastus. Ephedra. One climbing shrub of this genus is noticed by Sibthorp in Greece, and by Manetti in Italy. It is common on the borders of the Mediterranean. Dioscorides describes a shrub called Tpayo?\ called also crKop7rio9 and Tpayavov, chiefly occurring in maritime places, a palm or more in height, being a low shrub, oblong, without leaves, but with small red berries of the size of grains of wheat proceed- ing from its branches, pointed at top, and of an astringent taste. This is supposed by Fraas and others to be the Ephedra distachya of modern botanists. The plant named Ephedra by Pliny k has been conjectured to be the same, though some regard it as another species, viz. E. fragilis, if this be distinct from E. di.sl.achy a > which Grisebach doubts, and as corresponding to the ' linrovpis of Dioscorides1. 1 Lib. iv. c. 51. k Lib. xxvi. c. 20. ' iv. K',. iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 127 Asparagus. Four shrubby species are noticed by Sibthorp, of which the acutifolius, and perhaps aphyllus, are designated by Theophrastus m under the name of acnrapayos. It is known in Greece at present under the name of dcnrapdyyia. The cultivated kind of Asparagus does not appear to have been known in Greece, but it was much prized in Italy n. The wild Asparagus was there distinguished by the name of Corruda, that of Asparagus being confined to the kind under cultivation. Aloe. Aloe vulgaris, or perfoliata, was found by Sib- thorp wild in Cyprus and Andros. It is known at present, as in ancient times, by the name of dXor], but is generally met with cultivated, as the Agave is in Sicily. Pliny0 confounds it with other species of Aloe from the East, and especially with that employed medicinally. It seems to have been familiarly known in Rome from the allusion to it in Juvenal p : — "Plus aloes quam mellis habere." referring to its bitter flavour. Ruscus. Of this genus Sibthorp notices two shrubby species, and Manetti one. Of these, B. hypoglossum has been already iden- m vi. 3. n Pliny, xix. 42. ° Lib. xxvii. 5. ■' vi. 180. 128 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. titled in page 122, with the Laurus taxa, or Alex- andrina of Pliny, which is the same as Adtpvr) aXe^avbpeia of Theophrastus. Smilax. Three climbers of this genus are noticed by Sib- thorp, and one by Manetti. Smilax aspera is known at the present day by the name of oyxtAaf , so that we need not hesitate to refer to it the plant de- scribed under the same name by Theophrastus q, and by Pliny r. The trees noticed in the preceding pages pro- bably comprise all, or nearly all, which wTere re- cognised, or at least distinguished, by the ancients ; but the same cannot be said of the shrubs, many of those then existing having been overlooked by the writers whose works have come down to us. The utilitarian character, indeed, which belongs to all works on Natural History drawn up by the Greeks and Romans, excluded from the con- sideration of their authors those natural produc- tions which were not supposed in some way or other to minister to man's uses or enjoyment, so that the meagre catalogue of herbaceous plants given in my "Lectures on Roman Husbandry' may be easily accounted for by this circumstance ; and a similar deficiency in the shrubs enumerated mav be referred to the same cause. * iii. 18. r xvi. 03. iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 129 Indeed, the catalogue of either would probably have been even more scanty than is actually the case, had it not been for the medical properties ascribed by the ancients to so many more plants than modern experience justifies, owing to which various members of the vegetable kingdom have been distinguished by a place in Pliny's work, which is certainly not warranted by any real vir- tues belonging to them. These, however, are often merely alluded to by their vernacular names, and therefore are not re- cognisable at present, whilst in other cases the descriptions given are so vague and concise, that the real nature of the plant intended is left in a great degree a matter of conjecture. So difficult, indeed, is it to identify a modern plant from the description given by an ancient writer, that Sib thorp was glad to avail himself of two subsidiary means of determining what it might be, of which he has made a frequent use. The first of these consisted in ascertaining the vernacular name by which the plant is known in Greece at the present day, it being presumed that the peasants retain in most instances for familiar objects the appellations handed down to them by the first settlers in the country. Thus Sibthorp, in describing his ascent of Parnassus, observes : — " I walked out with a shepherd's boy to herbarize. My pastoral botanist surprised me not a little with his nomenclature ; I traced the names of Dioscorides and Theophrastus, corrupted, indeed, in some de- K 130 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. gree by pronunciation, and by the long series an- norum which had elapsed since the time of those philosophers ; but many of them were unmutilated, and their virtues faithfully handed down in the oral tradition of the country." And as an example of the use to which this species of evidence may be applied, I have re- marked in my " Roman Husbandry," that we have an additional reason for believing the Misletoe of the Oak, mentioned by Dioscorides, to have been the Loranthus europceus, and not the Viscum album, with which it has been usually identified, from finding that this plant is now called ofjv?, a mani- fest corruption of l£vsy whereas the parasite which grows on the Silver Fir is the true Misletoe, and is termed /ze'AAa. The other method of identifying the plants of Dioscorides, was by means of the drawings ap- pended to the Vienna MS., which I have already noticed in p. 231 of my "Roman Husbandry." From these it may be inferred, that the word aKOLvSos was used as a generic term for several plants of very distinct character, agreeing only in the circumstance of their being spinous3; that the %ov XevKov or XevKoiov was not a violet, but some species of cruciferous plant, and therefore perhaps, as Sibthorp considered it, the Cheiranthus Cheiri, or as it is now sometimes called, the Dame's Violet1; that the TolklvOos was not a Larkspur, but an ■ "Roman Husbandry," p. 211. ■ p. 240. iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 131 hexandrous plant resembling the Lily, and perhaps, as Tenore conjectured, the Gladiolus byzantinus. The plates also assist us in recognising Dios- corides' ct'ikvs ayplo?, which was the Momordica elaterium, or Squirting Cucumber, of the south of Europe ; the Currant Grape, as already noticed ; the plant called by Dioscorides 'Afi/uLcoviaKov, which was perhaps the Ferula orientalis, and certainly an umbelliferous plant ; the (f)vaa\h1 which from the drawing would seem to have been the Physalis alJceJcengi, although Sibthorp has chosen to identify the latter with the arpvyvos dXiKaKafios of Dios- corides, but the plate of which bears more re- semblance to the Physalis somnifera described by him. I might also appeal to the engravings of the KOLTnrapL?, or Caper plant ; of the different species of pLTjKcov, Poppy ; of the olSlolvtov, or Maiden's Hair Fern ; of the Ivy, kktctos ; of the larger House- leek, aeificoov to /uieya ; of the deificooi/ to \xiKpov^ the Sedum ochroleucum of modern botanists ; of the Aloe vulgaris, dXorj ; of the apKevOo?, or Juniper, as sufficiently resembling nature to enable us to determine at a glance the plant referred to. In many instances, however, it must be confessed that the artist has shewn his ignorance of the object intended, by having drawn entirely from his own imagination the figure with which he has pre- sented us. Hence, in spite of these aids, we are often left in doubt as to the plant which the naturalists of k2 132 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. antiquity, in their short, confused, and even incon- sistent descriptions, intended to bring before us. Modern botanists, too, have increased the con- fusion, by appropriating to the plants they de- scribe, without due consideration, the names found in ancient works, and these have been adopted without enquiry by many lexicographers. Thus JEscidus, the name for a species of Oak, is given to the Horse Chesnut, a tree which the ancients certainly were not acquainted with ; the Cytisus, which seems to correspond with the 31edi- cago arbor ea of modern botanists, has been trans- ferred to the Laburnum ; the Sycamore, a name given by the Greeks to a kind of Fig, is applied to a species of Maple, the Acer pseudo-plat anus. It will therefore not be a matter of surprise, that any catalogue of trees and shrubs given by modern writers, such as the one Loudon u obtained from an Italian botanist, Signor Manetti, should be so much more copious than that which can be collected from any treatise of antiquity ; even after exclud- ing from the list the exotic plants introduced from various parts of the old or new world, of which the ancients knew nothing. It may be remarked in general, that the number of frutescent species is for the most part greater in Greece than in Italy — a circumstance connected, no doubt, with the more southern latitude of the former country, and explicable on the Darwinian hypothesis, by the greater mildness of the climate, ■ Arboretum, vol. iv. iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 133 which allowed species, whose habit it was not to die down, to survive the winter, and thus to be- come perpetuated. It will be perceived, that I have not deemed it necessary for my purpose to set down in every in- stance the several species belonging to each genus, as it would be hopeless to discover an ancient name appropriate to every one, so that where, in the list at the end of the volume, a Greek or Latin name is merely placed opposite to that of the genus, it is implied that the whole genus may put in a claim to the synonyme. But although from my enumeration of the trees and shrubs now cultivated in Italy such as are exotic have been excluded, I do not adopt the same rule with regard to those named by the writers of antiquity, believing that there is often reason to doubt the authenticity of the statements given by Pliny and others as to the fact of their introduction from other regions. Without, indeed, questioning that the fruit-trees known to the ancients had an Eastern origin, and even that some ornamental plants cultivated in their gardens and pleasure-grounds may have been derived from other countries, I am inclined to be- lieve, with the younger Decandolle, that wherever a particular kind of tree has established .itself over a wide extent of country so as to constitute a forest, it ought, unless the contrary be proved, to be re- garded as natural to the soil. Now this seems to hold good with the Chesnut 134 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. at least, if not with the Walnut ; the former cover- ing in Tuscany and the south of France large tracts of country, and seeming as much entitled to the term of aborigines as the Oak or the Fir. Nor can it be said that these trees require the fostering care of man to maintain themselves in the countries where they existed in ancient days, as the Chesnut seems to do in England, and the Date Palm in Italy and Greece, for both ripen their fruit to perfection, issuing spontaneously from the ground from seeds self-planted, and are able to withstand the most rigorous cold ever experienced in those countries without being dwarfed or blighted in consequence. This position does not of course exclude any speculations that may be indulged in, as to the mode in which plants became disseminated by natural causes from the centres in which each may be supposed to have been originally created, under a different configuration of sea and land than that which now exists. But this was at least a process requiring a vast duration of time, probably indeed being long ante- cedent to the peopling of the country by its human inhabitants. It seems certain, that forests of Oak, of Chesnut, and of Beech must have established themselves throughout Europe before man took possession of the country, for unless we conceive that the first settlers brought with them seed-corn and other do- mestic vegetables, and had already passed through iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 135 the previous stages of hunter and pastoral life, we must adopt the early traditions which represent them as living upon acorns, beech -nuts, and chesnuts. Thus Lucretius : — " Glaudiferas inter curabaut corpora quercus Plerumque; et, quae nunc liiberno tempore cernis, Arbuta puniceo fieri matura colore, Plurima turn tellus, etiam majora ferebat ; Multaque praeterea novitas tutu florida mundi Pabula dia tulit, miseris mortalibus ampla v." " But acorn-meals chief culled they from the sheds Of forest oaks ; and in their wintry months, The wide wood-whortle with its purple fruit Fed them, then larger and more amply poured, And many a boon besides, now long extinct, The fresh-formed earth her hapless oft spring dealt." As Decandolle observes, the mere conveyance of the seeds of amentaceous and coniferous plants across an arm of the sea by natural causes is almost inconceivable, and the spontaneous establishment of a forest of such trees absolutely impossible, un- less man took the trouble of bringing it about ; whilst the extension of such forests in the early ages of Greece and Rome would seem to throw back their antiquity to a date, when the human race was too rude and unsettled to have attempted such an undertaking. Chesnuts then, as well as the other Cupuliferce which are found in forests throughout Europe, may fairly be regarded, in spite of the authority of ' Lib. v. 937—942. 136 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. Pliny, as indigenous to the countries in which they are found. If the gaps which occur in the continuity of these forests create a difficulty, if it be objected that large intermediate spaces exist where such trees are entirely wanting, it is much more easy to conceive that they had died off in the latter locali- ties, than that they had been planted in the coun- tries where they are found through the instru- mentality of man. Thus certain species of Oak seem to be under- going diminution at the present time. Q. cerris, spread over the whole of Asia Minor, is now found in Europe only in a few isolated spots, as in the Apennines, in Sicily, near Besancon, and in the west of France along the Loire. The Pinus excelsa, so abundant in the Himalayas, has been detected, as we have seen x, by Grisebach on the mountains of Rumelia, but is not known to occur in any intermediate position. These may be regarded as oases in the midst of vast spaces over which the species is unknown. The com- mon Oak even seems to shew symptoms of wear- ing out, not establishing itself spontaneously in countries where it has been exterminated, and, where it exists, suffering from the destruction of its forests through the agency of man and beasts. On the other hand the Beech appears to be extending itself throughout Europe, owing partly to drainage, partly to a fit soil being prepared for it by the detritus x See p. 32. iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 137 of leaves of other trees, and partly from its stifling other plants by its own foliage, and thus obtain- ing exclusive possession of the soil. Of the extinction of trees within periods which, although very remote, must in a geological sense be regarded as modern, we have a striking instance in the fact stated by Danish naturalists, and recorded in Ly ell's " Antiquity of Man," p. 9, that although the Scotch fir is not a native of the Danish Islands, and when introduced there does not appear to thrive, yet that its trunks are met with in the bogs at various depths, associated with flint implements. In the same bogs, but at a higher level, are found prostrate trunks of the sessile variety of the com- mon Oak, and still higher up some of the peduncu- lated variety of the same tree, together with the Alder, Birch, and Hazel. Now the Oak in later times has been almost superseded throughout Den- mark by the Beech. Other trees, such as the White Birch, characterise the lower part of the bogs, but disappear from the higher; while others, again, such as the Aspen, Pojmlus fremula, occur at all levels. This, and other corresponding facts that might be cited from the animal kingdom, shew, that even under the present conditions of the earth's surface particular plants disappear, and others take their place. I have alluded to this fact in a paper read before the Natural History Section of the British Associa- 138 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. tion, at the meeting held in Bath y, and it may not be out of place to recapitulate here the arguments which have led me to suspect, that even when the external conditions remain unchanged, each species, like every individual belonging to it, has its days numbered, and that the period assigned to its dura- tion may be extended indeed by favourable, and abridged by unfavourable external conditions, but in no case can transcend certain definite limits. I there remarked, that we seem in this instance to trace the workings of two antagonistic prin- ciples ; the first, that which aims at handing down to the offspring the leading characteristics of its parents ; the second, one which causes the vigour of the race gradually to decline, and its peculiar excellences to be effaced, owing to the balance, upon which the harmonious workings of the system depend, being destroyed, through the undue preponderance of one element, and the dimi- nution or loss of another. In both instances, however, nature seems to have provided means for postponing this inevitable ter- mination for a longer or shorter interval of time ; namely, by those variations from the primitive type, which are to a certain extent brought about by the mere process of sexual reproduction, and which are still further secured by those contrivances for pre- venting self-fertilization, to which Mr. Darwin and others have of late called particular attention. * Tlii , : published in extenso in the "Gardener's Chronicle" for October, L864. iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 139 In animals the frequent union of individuals too nearly identical is checked by the power of locomotion which they possess, and a still further tendency to variation is brought about by the changes in climate, food, &c. which they have to encounter. But in plants, special contrivances against self- fertilization appear to have been required for pre- venting the too rapid deterioration of the race, so that, even in cases where the male and female organs grow together, it has been provided, that the pollen of one flower should be conveyed in various ways to the stigmas of another ; and it seems a significant fact, that in so much the greater majority of instances, trees, and other plants of long duration and of vigorous growth, should possess either moncecous or dioecous flowers, as if it were intended by this arrangement to renovate more effectually the vitality of the plant, and thus to secure to. the species a longer period of existence. Yet with all these provisions for prolonging the life of a species, its days, like those of the indi- viduals composing it, are numbered, and the only question that remains for us to consider is, whether its dying out is to be regarded simply as the result of the altered condition of climate, soil, &c. to which it has been subjected, or occurs from some inherent tendency to decay in its own organization. The former explanation is the most obvious one, and may prove satisfactory to certain minds ; for 140 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. the gradual sinking of temperature which has taken place in the crust of the globe, down to the glacial period, and its subsequent elevation during that in which we live, suggest causes for the disappearance of certain species, and for the substitution of others, which may be deemed sufficient to afford an ade- quate solution of the problem. Nevertheless, if these effects are exclusively due to climate, certain other conditions, at least, be- sides that of temperature, must be concerned in producing them. Take, for instance, the case of the Welling tonia. This tree, or one nearly allied to it, existed gene- rally throughout Europe during the Miocene period. The Lignites of Bovey Tracey, in Devonshire, are supposed to be principally made up of its remains, and an allied species is widely distributed over Europe and America, from Italy to Greenland, during the Miocene period, when the climate is supposed to have been almost sub-tropical. At present, its only native habitat is California, yet it does not seem to have been limited to this one region by the gradually decreasing temperature, since in that case it would not have survived the glacial period, nor would it prove capable of re- sisting the present winters of Great Britain. Mr. Bateman, who has introduced this tree largely into his plantations in Cheshire, considers it hardier than the Deodara ; yet from some mysterious cause unconnected with temperature, all his specimens were blighted in the spring of 1864, whilst the iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 141 Deodar as did not suffer. Does not this fact sug- gest some unexplained condition of climate which, operating upon the species over a long lapse of years, has at length reduced it to the narrow limits in which it is found native — unless indeed we fall back upon that higher law, which prescribes to each species a limited period of duration, and sup- poses this period to be arriving in the case of this remarkable vegetable production ? It may be said, indeed, that such an inference is contradicted by the vigorous growth and gigantic proportions which this tree assumes in the spots where it still exists. Yet the same remark would apply to several other trees of great size and vigour, such as the Dracaena draco, the Callitris quadri- valvis, and the Glyptostrobus heterophyllus*, now confined to one country, though formerly of much more extensive distribution. In these cases, also, it is difficult to point out what changes of climate could have led to their being thus restricted within their present range. But it is time to bring these Lectures to a ter- mination, in concluding which I cannot help re- marking upon the small progress made in natural knowledge between the period of Alexander and Trajan, a distance of time amounting to not less z Callitris, found now in Algeria, has been detected in the Miocene formation of Aix, in Provence. (Count Saporta in the Ann. des Sc. Nat.) Glyptostrobus, found now in China aud Japan, had spread during the tertiary period over Switzerland ; Draccena draco is now confined to Teneriffe. 142 THE TREES AND SHRUBS [lect. than from four to five hundred years. In accuracy of information Theophrastus and Aristotle both greatly exceed Pliny, whose work, although in- valuable as a Cyclopaedia, bears evident marks of being a compilation, and not the result of original research. The Romans, indeed, seemed to have acted to- wards the Greeks, as our mediaeval writers did towards the ancients, and instead of observing for themselves, were contented with copying from pre- ceding authors, w7hose statements had with them the force and authority of ocular demonstration. Thus there is often a remarkable similarity be- tween the descriptions of plants given by Pliny and Dioscorides, shewing either that one copied from the other, or that both derived their information from some common source. Yet neither writer ever alludes to the other, unless Pliny may be sup- posed to do so in a passage of his 36th Book, c. 37, where, after describing a stone called Schistos, possessing medicinal virtues in diseases of the eye, much in the same terms as Dioscorides does in his 5th Book, c. 145, he adds, " Haec est sententia eorum, qui nuperrime scripsere." Pliny, indeed, is very copious in his citations of antecedent authors, but perhaps at the time when he drew up his list, Dioscorides had not risen into that celebrity which he afterwards obtained, as being the writer who has handed down to us the fullest account of the simples employed by the ancients. Nevertheless it seems to be pretty well ascer- iv.] OF THE ANCIENTS. 143 tained, that Dioscorides lived in the age of Pliny, for he dedicates his books to one Areus Asclepia- dens, who was the friend of Leecanius Bassus, one of the Consuls in a.d. 64, during the reign of Nero, fifteen years before the great eruption of Vesuvius in which Pliny perished. At all events, it seems probable that both these writers derived much of their information from one common source, and it is to be feared that, in too many instances, this was obtained not directly from the observation of Nature, but from earlier autho- rities, such as Theophrastus and others of inferior credibility. Another remarkable proof of their practice of appealing servilely to authority for the facts they record, in preference to going themselves to the fountain-head, is afforded by the drawings of plants which accompany some of the MSS. of Dioscorides, the oldest of which extant, is that of Vienna, already alluded to in my Lectures a, having been executed in the fifth century, and therefore not very far dis- tant from the age in which Dioscorides himself flourished ; yet they bear on the face of them the appearance of being copies, and often blundering copies, of drawings of even an earlier date. And a MS. several centuries more recent than this, which had been originally procured from the East by a Florentine nobleman named Renuccini, in whose family it had remained for more than a century, and which is now in the possession of * "Rom. Husb.," p. 231. 144 THE TREES AND SHRUBS, &c. [lect. iv. Sir Thomas Phillips, of Middle Hill, in Worcester- shire, was likewise accompanied with coloured draw- ings, in many cases identical with those in the earlier MS. alluded to. The works of Columella, too, are in most re- spects an amplification in more elegant Latinity of the earlier writings of Cato and Varro, and very possibly the two latter would have been found to be taken from the great Carthaginian work on Agriculture by Mago, if the latter had come down to us. How mortifying it is to think, that whilst these repetitions of facts, and even of old fables, recorded by many of the authors referred to, might have been so well spared, we should have to deplore such gaps in the history and literature of antiquity, as have arisen from the loss of many of the Books of Livy, and from the almost entire destruction of the Comedies of Menander and Epicharmus. CATALOGUE OF TREES AND SHRUBS INDIGENOUS IN GREECE AND ITALY, WITH THEIR ANCIENT GREEK AND LATIN SYNONYMES. N.B. Rom. Hush, denotes my Lectures on Roman Husbandry, 1857; Th., Theophrastus; Dios., Dioscorides; PL, Pliny; Virg., Virgil; Ov., Ovid; Sib., Sibthorp; Dec, Decandolle ; Linn., Linnaeus. Under eacb genus tbose species only are enumerated, wbich can be identified with some degree of probability with the plants named in Greek or Latin writers. Modern Greece. Berberis, 2 sp. cretica Capparis, 2 sp. Dianthus, 2 sp. Cistus, 21 sp. . • creticus . villosus . salvifolius Linum, 2 sp. . Hypericum, 6 sp. Hibiscus, 1 sp. Ruta, 3 sp. Coriaria, 1 sp. Staphylea, 1 sp. Euonymus, 1 sp. Ilex, 1 sp. . — — aquifolium Modern Italy. Clematis, 4 species . 8 species 2 sp. 1 sp. 1 sp. 6 sp. Helianthe- mum, 2 sp. 3 sp. . 1 sp. . 1 sp. . 1 sp. . 1 sp. . 3 sp. . 3 sp. . Ancient Greek Names. K\?7 fiarlrts Kv\ovTea(Th..)? Kdmrapis . Aios avdos i Addauov Klov Se'creXi aWioni kov (Sib.) Kittos, or Kicraos . Primus Chamsecera- sus Sorbum Amygdalus Malus Persica Armeniaca Cerasus Stobe . . . Rosa . Pyrus . Pyrus Malus MalusCydonia Torminalis Spina appen- dix, Spina alba Cornum . Praxinus . Ornus . My rice Myrtus Malum puni cum Aizoum . Edera . Page 84 2 and 88 2 2 2 89 88 2 and 90 4 and 90 49 50 52 52 90 91 92 93 2 92 91 91 94 148 Modern Greece. Viburnum, 2 sp. . Lonicera, 5 sp. Ernodea, 1 sp. Scabiosa, 1 sp. Santolinaa, 1 sp. . maritima Conyza, 4 sp. Candida Artemisia, 1 sp. arborescens Senecio, \ sp. . . Gnaphalium, 2 sp. — — stcechas . Staehelina, 2 sp. Pteronia, 1 sp. Centaurea, 1 sp. Cineraria, 1 sp. Erica, 6 sp. arborea . Arbutus, 2 sp. • unedo Andrachne Rhododendron Vaccinium, 1 ftp. Catalogue of Trees and Shrubs Modern Italy. Cornus, 1 sp. . Sambucus, 3 sp. nigra ebulus 2 sp. 3 sp. 4 sp. Tinus 9 sp. 1 sp. chamsecypa- rissus . 2 sp. abrotanum santonica 1 sp). 1 sp. 6 sp. Calluna, 1 sp. Arctostaphy- lus, 1 sp. 3 sp. . . Rhododen- dron, 2 sp. Ancient Greek Names. Kpavia yAKTT] . Xa/xaidKTT] A'lyiXos . TvatpaXiov (rSib.) . JJ6\lov r 'ApKTLOV (Dios. ?) 'Apre/ziVta . 'Ayj/lvdtou . I Hpiyepov . TL\ixpvTis • Yerbascum Polium Thymbra Stcechas . Origanum Dictamnus Thymus . Stachys? Phlomis oleoides (L.) Salvia . Libanotis, or Rosmarinus fAyvos,OY Avyos Agnus castus aXipos (Dios.) | Alimon (PI.) Kvecopos Kve8r]s Uv£6s . Sycamorus 3 sp. nigra 2 sp. 1 sp. 1 sp. 1 sp. 3 sp. 3 sp. SvKrj 2vkapli'os (ev A.lyvTVT(o) "2,VKOpopQV (Dios.) 2vKap.Li>os(Th.) Kdpvov Baai- Ai*oi>(Dios.) rireXea Acotos (Dios.) KXrjOpos Ancient Latin Names. Laurus Osyris Aristolocliia . Euphorbia,Ti- thymalus . Euphorbia dendroides Buxus Ficus . . . Ficus Egyptia 'OdTpVS Kapva VPa~ KdpvOV TTOVTL- kuv (Dios*) Morus Nux Juglans Ulmus Alnus Carpinus Ostrya Nux abellina, or pontica Page 121 119 123 123 124 124 125 2 6 53 54 55 60 In my first Lecture, p. 2, I have given for the Sycamore Fig the Latin synonyme of Bycamonu; and for the Mulberry that of Morus, omitting the corresponding Greek svuoii vines, viz.. IvKan'tvos Al-yvmia for the former, and %vK*fdvo$ alone for the latter. That Theophraetni employed the terms in this sense was pointed out by Bodseua in his notes on Theophrastnj, and is confirmed by Frtai (Synopsis Plant. PL CI.) from various considerations. DioecoridoJ uses the term /xopia and (rvicafxr)u4a for the Black Mulberry, and that of XuKafiivos (*> AlyvwTw;, or simply rb luxSnopo; for the Sycamore Fig. Modern Greece. Salix . . Populus, 3 sp. alba . Indigenous in Greece and Italy. Modern Italy. 151 Ancient Greek Names. 10 sp. 3 sp. nigra tremula Fagus, 1 sp. . . sylvatica Castanea, 1 sp. . . vesca Quercus, 9 sp. . - robur . . . - esculus . ilex .... suber . . cerris or Tour- nefortii . . . . toza (dwarf va- riety of cerris) . . pseudo-suber . aegilops . coccifera 1 sp. 1 sp. 10 sp. Platanus, 1 sp. . . Taxus, 1 sp. Ephedra, I sp. . . Pinus, 4 sp. . . . halepensis, or mantima laricio, or syl- vestris — pinea — excelsa' Abies pectinata . (Pinus picea, Sib.) Jnniperus, 6 sp. — — communis oxycedrus Betula, 1 sp. 1 sp. . 'irea 'A^epany, Or AevKT) Aiyetpos 'OtvT, . . Kaaravov . Apis Qrjyos . Upivos T£ka.TV(pvWos CH pep is 'AXicpXoios . AlyiXcoyjr Hpivos . Ancient Latin Names. Salix . Populus alba nigra Fagus Castanus nXdravos . MlXvs . T 'pay os (Dios.) Pinaster . Alugho Cembra excelsa . Larix CedrusLibani Thuya arti- culata . 4 sp. IleVKT] . JJevKt] 7rapa\ias TlevKT) 'iSaia Illrvs . EXclttj . KeBpos \\pK€i>Bos piKpa Kedpos piKpa Robur Esculus Ilex Suber Latifolia Hemeris Haliphlceos iEgilops Ilex (PL) Betulla Platanus . Taxus Ephedra . Pinaster Tibulus Tajda Picea Pinus Strobus ? Abies Larix Cedrus Citrus gallica . Page 55 55 7 10 59 61 42 126 18 26 22 33 41 38 Lately added to the list by Grisebach, see p. 32. 152 Catalogue of Trees and Shrubs. Modern Greece. Juniperus phcenicia sabina excelsa . Cupressus, 1 sp. . sempervirens Asparagus, 3 sp. acutifolius Aloe, 1 sp. . . Ruscus, 3 sp. . hypoglossum hypophyllum aculeatus Smilax, 1 sp. Modem Italy. 2 sp. 3 sp. 2 sp. Ancient Greek Names. BpdOus erepov BpdBvs Kedpos ? KvTrdpiTTOs (Th.) . 'A(T7rapayos 'aXo'j? . 'YnoyXcoaaov (Dios.) . . Adcpvrj ake^av- dpeia (Dios.) XcipaiSdcpvr) MvpaivT) dypta 2/xiAa£ Ancient Latin Names. Cedrus ? Cypressus Corruda Aloe . Laurus Taxa, Radix Idsea (ho Laurus Alex- andria (PL) Smilax Page 42 127 127 122 Printcb bj) gtrssra. piulur, (Tornmarhrt, ©xforb. CORRECTIONS AND ADDITIONS. Page 9. Quercus pubescens. According to Dr. Alex- ander Prior, this is not a variety of Q. robur, but a dis- tinct species. Page 10. I have omitted in my list of oaks Quercus occidentalis of Gay. Page 13. Ilex aqui folium is now removed from the Rhamnea, and placed by A. Brongriart in a family of its own. Page 28. A similar tendency to put forth fresh branches when cut down, is noticed in the " Gardener's Chronicle" for August 17, 1861, by Dr. Seemann, as existing in a species of Fir which was found composing a forest in Arcadia, one league and a-half from Tripolitza, called by Heldreich Abies Regince Amalice. It is pronounced by Murray a to be the same species as Abies Apollinis of Link, which latter was omitted in my work, as having been identified by Endlicher with P. pectinata, although Goudon regards it the same as cephalonica. Page 34. The anecdote related with regard to the first introduction of the Cedar of Lebanon into France, was extracted, without enquiry on my part, from an article " On Coniferous Trees," which appeared in the No. of the " Edinburgh Review" for October, 1864. It turns out, however, to be a tissue of errors, occa- sioned by blending into one, two stories utterly un- connected, as I might have learnt before printing my Essay, had the remarks of Dr. Asa Gray, inserted iu " Silliman's Journal" for March, 1861, fallen in my way when they first appeared. It is indeed true, that the first seedling of the Cedar of Lebanon which ever reached France, was brought there by Bernard de Jussieu in his hat, just as is repre- ■ Hort. Soc. Proc, 1863. sented in an engraving to Cap's popular work, entitled L< MusSc iVHistoirc Xaturelle, 185 1. p. 15. But the plant iu question was brought, not from the Holy Land, which indeed Jussieu had never visited, but from England. It is also true, that the seal and self-devotion which the Reviewer erroneously ascribes to Bernard de Jussieu, iu preserving the Cedar of Lebanon, was really evinced with regard to another plant, the Coffee, by the individual to whose care it had been confided. It appears, that when the French Government wished to introduce the cultivation of Coffee into their AY est Indian Colonies, they despatched a vessel laden with a few o( these plants to Martinique, In the course of a voyage unusually protracted through contrary winds, the crew were all placed upon short allowance, and the Coffee plants in general perished of drought. One, however, was kept alive by the captain, who divided with it the scant v portion ot^ water that fell to his share, and this solitary specimen became the parent of all those now found in the Antilles. The name of the captain, M. Peelieux. has been per- petuated by the name Declieuxia, given to a genus allied to the Coffee, in remembrance of Ins services. By thus jumbling together these two stories, the Re- viewer would seem to have concocted the anecdote, which has been unwittingly transferred to the pages of my Essay. Page 10, Dn James Mitchell has published in a distinct pamphlet, a fuller account of the Citrus wood of the an- cients, than is given in my Essay. Page 50. ( '( rnus mascula is not the Cornel of English Botanists, which is Cornus sanpuinea. Page v7. r iu the Ann. oi Nat Hist., suggests that the Lotus of Homer may have been Xitrarui tri- iftntnta. a plant eonnnou m Bai ary. ublicatbits frg ijxe %vA\ax. A DESCRIPTION OF ACTIYE AND EXTINCT VOLCANOS, OF EARTHQUAKES, AND OF THERMAL SPRINGS; With Remarks on their Causes, Products, and Influence on the Condition of the Globe. Second Edition, greatly enlarged. With Twelve Maps and Plates. Tayloh and Fbancis, London, 1818. 8vo. Price with Supplement, 1858, £1 Is. BRIEF REMARKS ON THE CORRELATION OF THE NA- TURAL SCIENCES. Drawn up with reference to the Scheme for the Extension and the Better Management of the Studies of the University. J. Vincent, Oxford, 1848. 8vo. Is. A POPULAR GUIDE TO THE BOTANIC GARDEN OF OXFORD, AND TO THE FIELDING HERBARIUM ANNEXED TO IT. Second Edition. Sold only at the Garden. 16mo. 6d. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE ATOMIC THEORY. Second Edition, greatly enlarged, 1852. Printed at the Oxfoed Univeesity Peess. 12mo. 6s. CAN PHYSICAL SCIENCE OBTAIN A HOME IN AN ENGLISH UNIVERSITY? An Inquiry suggested by some Remarks contained in a late number of the "Quarterly Review." J. Vincent, Oxford, 1853. 8vo. Is. LECTURES ON ROMAN HUSBANDRY, delivered before the University of Oxford ; comprehending an Account of the System of Agricul- ture, the Treatment of Domestic Animals, the Horticulture, &c, pursued in Ancient Times. Oxford and London : J. H. and J. Paekee. 8vo. 6s. CLIMATE: AN INQUIRY INTO THE CAUSES OF ITS DIFFERENCES, AND INTO ITS INFLUENCE ON VEGETABLE LIFE. Comprising the substance of Four Lectures delivered before the Natural History Society, at the Museum, Torquay, in February, 1863. Oxford and London : J. H. and J. Paekee. 8vo. 4s. University of British Columbia Library DUE DATE »' ' i FORM 3IO L. I Kfi C- Z>^> W8 V3 &7 DZ U, I ■!■■''• M i ■< X j •i r- £3 1