I MASSACHUSETTS STATE COLLEGE GOODELL LIBRARY P. ev 6ev.3 v:46 No.l, Vol. XLVI.] JULY, 1874. [Third Seeibs. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE AND MONTHLY JOURNAL o? THE AGEICULTUEAL INTEEEST. TO THE FAEMERS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM. LONDON : PUBLISHED BYROGERSON AND TUXFORD, 265, STRAND. PRICB TWO SHILLINGS. WATSON AND HAZBLL.] [PBINTER8, 265, STRAND. THE FAKMER'S MAGAZIl^E. CONTENTS. JULY, 1874. F THE Highland Hector George Growing very PLATB.--OXFORDSHIRE DOWNS. Description of Plate .... Tenant-Right in the House ...» The Surrey Prize Lease .... The International Agricultural Exhibition at Bremen The Norfolk Agricultural Society : Meeting at Norwich The Commercial Principle .... Lavenham Farmers' Club : The Economy of Labour . East Lothian Farmers' Club : The Chemical Department o and Agricultural Society ... Framlingham Farmers' Club: Our Expenses . The Financial Proposals .... The Diseases of Stock in 1873 The Influence of Cold upon the Production of Wool: By Dr The London Market from a Foreign Point of View . The Lumbering Business in Michigan Manorial Rights ..... Royal Agricultural Society of England The Highland and Agricultural Society of Scotland The Central Chamber of Agriculture Tenant-Right. . . . . • Crop Prospects in America .... The Composition of Green Crops and the Undesirability o Large Roots , . . . • Ixworth Farmers' Club : Labour-Saving Machinery Lancashire Farmers' Club .... Ballarat Farmers' Club .... The Power of the Farmers .... Clubs for Working Men . . . • EoYAL Agricultural Benevolent Institution . The Ulster Tenant-Right Bill: By an East Essex Farmer The Bath and West of England Society and Southern Counties Association Meeting at Bristol ...... Devon County Agricultural Association : Meeting at Barnstaple The Royal Cornwall Agricultural Society : Meeting at St. Austell The Oxfordshire Agricultural Society : Meeting at Witney . The Cambridgeshire and Isle of Ely Agricultural Society: Meeting at Newmarket ..... The Horse Show at the Agricultural Hall, Islington Stock Sales : Sale of Shorthorns at Blisworth The Late Mr Blith's Shorthorn Herd Another Great Sale of American Shorthorns The Adulteration of Food .... Agricultural Law Case .... East Lothian Agricultural Club . . • The Midland Farmers' Club .... The Introduction of Superphosphate or Dissolved Bones The Dorsetshire Down .... Review op the Corn Tradb During the Past Month „ 1 3 4 5 10 12 13 17 20 23 26 29 30 31 32 33 37 37 42 43 44 45 49 50 51 54 56 59 60 67 71 74 75 76 78 79 80 82 83 84 86 87 88 89 p THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. JULY, 1874. PLATE. OXFOEDSHIRB DOWNS. Fkoji the Flock of His Geace the Duke or Maklborough. The Blenheim flock of Oxfordshire Down Sheep was established by the late Duke of Marlborough, upwards of thirty years since, and has been improved by the present Duke, with the assistance of his able bailiffs, w^ho have from time to time judiciously selected the best rams, regardless of cost, from famous flocks of that breed, such as those of Mr. Gillett of Cote ; Mr. Bryan, Southleigh ; Mr, Wallis, Old Trafford ; Mr. Drnce, Eynsham; Mr. Roberts, Caswell ; and Mr. Tread well, Winchendon. The sheep possess eminently all those qualities which good breeders so much admire and strive to obtain. The Blenheim sheep possess such recommendations as hardi- hood, symmetry, and aptitude to fatten, with close and heavy fleeces ; while they produce mutton which essen- tially constitutes them butchers' sheep. The Wethers in our Engraving took the first prize in their class at the last Smithfield Club Show; while at the Show of the Club in 1872 a pen from the Blenheim flock took the Champion Plate as the best pen of sheep in the show. They have also been very successful about the country. We hear, however, that the Home Farm has been let, and that the stock will be dispersed in the autumn. CJ> CO CD J>.3 Old Skries.j Vol. LXXVI.— No. 1. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. TENANT-RIGHT IN THE HOUSE. In the Commons the othei' evening, on the resump- tion of the sitting, an attemjit mas made to count the House, but " fortunately forty members were found to be present." Everybody of course knows what this means : some honourable gentleman has given notice that he shall speak and move on a subject, iu itself, so dull, dreary and unprofitable that it is to be hoped no one will care to listenmuch less to reply. In a word the count-out implies the most contemptuous indifference to a matter not worth talking about — and that is a big word,too, in the Commons' House of Parliament. But as the question was not the monks and the monasteries, nor the Claimant and his trial, fortunately forty people were found to be present, and the debate proceeded, as this turned on so trivial a theme as English Tenant-Right. Mr. Seely, who opened the business, proposed that, " with a view to improved cultivation, the Government should introduce a measure for giving increased security for capital to be invested in the soil by agricultural tenants." And having thus as it were defined the principle, Mr. Seely proceeded to damage so far as he possibly could the only means by which this can be really extended and effectually carried out. His speech was mainly an attack on Messrs. Howard and Read's Bill of last Session : " it contained provisions which were highly objectionable, and amongst them was that which prohibited freedom of contract between landlord and tenant. It was clearly the landlord's interest to give compensation," and so forth. And what warranty had Mr. Seely for all he said and thought iu this way ? Manifestly the most direct answer was to be gathered from the audience he was addressing. From a composite body of many hundreds of men, where the laud- owners, whenever they so choose, are suflficiently numerous to rank as a majority, how many were so far alive to their own " interest" as even to be present ? There were in all barely forty people before him, and had Mr. Seely pressed his motion to a division it would have been seen that the landed proprietors and county members were as contemptuously indifferent to their own "interests" as to the nuns' wrongs Dr Sir Roger's rights. On the face of it, by the manner in which they met, or rather avoided the question, it is " clear" that the landlords will not of their own will take up the principle of Tenant-Right. Indeed, if they will do so, where can be the necessity for Mr. Seely's prayer for speedy legislation ? Or, as Mr. Barclay put it with much force and some sarcasm : " If the landlords were all as enlightened, just, fair, and honourable, and the tenants as intelligent, shrewd, and independent as the honorable member had pictured them to be, there was no occasion for the interference of Parliament in the matter. It was, however, a fact that in a small part of England only was there any settled arrangement existing between landlords and tenants as to compensation for permanent, durable, or even temporary improvements effected on the farms. The conviction of men practically acquainted with the subject, including the honorable member for South Norfolk, was that if au Act of Parliament dealing with it did not in some way interfere with freedom of contract, it would be worthless." And Mr. Barclay went on to say " the bill of the honourable member for South Norfolk and Mr. Howard was a fair attempt to deal with the question ;" while Mr. Pell, on the contrary, " did not agree with the bill which the honourable member for South Norfolk had introduced ;" and Mr. Disraeli said that '"' in the next session of Parlia- ment the consideration of the House may be called to the matter in a manner that may not realise the views which some honourable gentlemen have expressed to-night, but which may promise the practical solution of a question of great national importance." Now what does this mean? A measure niai/ be introduced in which the compulsory clause ioill not be embodied; as this is as clear as if the Premier had said so much in so many words. On the other hand we have heard Mr. Sewell Read declare that he " would not walk across a room to support a bill from which the com- pulsory clause was struck out ?" As we have already shown, Mr. Read was actually attacked through his measure by such agricultural authorities as Mr. Seely and Mr. Pell, but he sat by and made no sign, although, as we had understood, Tenant-Right was a question on which he was " unfettered." At the dinner of the Royal Agricultural Benevolent Institution last week Mr. Read said, "having accepted a responsible post, he was bound as a good soldier to know and carry out the requirements of discipline and duty. Certain duties which devolved upon him in his present ■position were extremely pleasant. He liked his work, he was well contented with his ' wages.' " This is all very well so far as it goes, but if the "' wages " — the word is Mr. Read's and not ours — compel him to keep sUence while men like Mr. Seely, Mr. Chaplin and Mr. Pell are speaking on subjects of the first importance to farmers, we should be inclined to think there must be certain conditions attached to the " present position " which were " extremely ?wipleasant." In truth, from the able and zealous advocate of a cause Mr. Read would look to have ripened already into the mere official, as we fail to see how he can claim to be unfettered if he cannot deliver himself on subjects over which his brother agri- culturists come to turn to him for advice and assistance. It does not appear that Mr. Seely was acting in concert with any man, or any body of men ; and from the injury he contrived to do to a good cause, tve can only the more regret that Mr. James Howard was no longer in his place in the House to answer for his own bill. It is very manifest that Mr. Seely is not qualified to fill the vacant post, even if the Government, with Mr. Sewell Read amongst them, should accede to his request, and " intro- duce a measure." On the resumption of business at nine o'clock, ia the House of Comraous, on Friday eveniug, June 19th, an unsuccess- ful attempt having been made to count out the House, On the motion for going into committee of supply, Mr. Seely proceeded to move — " That, in tlte opinion of this House, her Majesty's Government should, with a view to improved cultivation of the land, introduce, with as little delay as possible, a measure for giving increased security for c ipital to be invested in the soil by agricultural tsuauts." Having reviewed the unsuccessful attempts which had been made in \?t¥l and subsequently by Mr. Posey to legislate in the ilirec- tion of providing that compensation should be (granted to tenant-farmers for unexhausted improvements, the lion, gen- tleman observed that Uttle or nothing had been done in regard to the matter since 1850 until three or four years ago, when the formation of Chambers of Agriculture led to the subject being taken up so strongly that it had now occupied a more prominent place than even the question of local taxation or the repeal of the Malt-tax. The present state of the law was that where there was no custom such as existed in Lincolnshire giving tenant-farmers compensation, and that custom existed only in a very small degree throughout England, and when there was no agreement with the landlord when the tenant- j farmer quitted his holding, he left all that he had put into the ( soil behind him, For instance ,he might Inve Bpent £3,000 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. or £4,000 ill clialkiug bis land, and have derived no benefit from it bimself, as its good effects would not be felt for the first twelve mouths ; but as the law now stood, if he quitted his farm the incoming tenant would reap the benefit of his expenditure. There were special cases in winch the tenant- farmer was put to even greater inconvenience and loss. He might enter iuto an agreement, giving him compensation, with his landlord, who was the life owner of tlie estate, but if the life owner died the tenant could not claim compensation from his successor. Again, if a landowner having the fee simple entered iuto an agreement with his tenant to give him compensation, and subsequently sold the estate, unless that agreement was endorsed on the title deeds the tenant could not claim one farthing from the purchaser. As two-thirds of the land of England was under settlement in this way it .miglit easily be imagined how great a number of cases of hardship might arise. The results of this state of the law were that the farmer was deterred from spending money in fertilising the soil, and he complained that annually he had less profit, and that when he quitted a large portion of iiis capital was taken away from him ; the labourers justly complained that the state of the law prevented them from obtaining that demand for labour which they otherwise would have, and the public com- plained that in consequence of capital not being employed freely in the cultivation of the soil food was less in quan- tity and higher in price, and that consequently the local rates were on the increase. The law might be changed to the benefit ot the farmer, the labourer, and the pubhc without injury to the landowner, for tlie latter must be benefited by any law which increased tiie fertility of the soil, and therefore the value of his property. Lincoln- shire presented a notable example of the effect of Tenant- Right in increasing the wages of the labourer ; for, for many years past, the average rate of the wages of the Lincolnshire labourer had been 2s. or 3s. per week higher than those of the labourer in the soutiiern counties, where there was no Tenant- Right. Tlie hon. member urged in favour of the view he took the report of the Select Committee on Mr. Pusey's Bill of 1847, which stated that the system of Tenant-Right seemed to be highly beneficial, and to tend to a great increase in the productiveness of the soil, and extended employment for the rural population. In the debate upon Mr. Pusey's Bill the late Sir Robert Peel said that to the principle of promoting the application of capital to land in order to secure better improvements, and of providing just compensation to tenants there could be no objection whatever. He (Mr. Seely) questioned whether there would be any opposition to the principle of giving compensation to tenant-farmers in the absence of any agreement to the contrary, and the real point was how far that principle should be extended. Upou that there might be a great ditfcrence of opinion. The custom of granting compensation varied in different counties. But in the greater part of England there was no custoai or usage whatever on the subject. It might be said that leases lor 19 or 20 years would be all that was necessary, but there was this objection — that in the later years of the lease the farmer, not expecting a renewal of it, would scourge the land. It was, therefore, in the interest of the tenant, and especially of the public that compensation should be given in order that the land might be continued to be cultivated during the last year of the tenancy. Last year an attempt was made to settle the question by the lion, members for Bedford and South Norfolk, and mauy of the provisions of tiieir bill were ex- cellent, so far as they gave compensation to farmers, but he objected to that part which prevented freedom of contract. In any future legislation on the sulyect he hoped notiiing would be done to interfere with that. Another point — a rather serious point — in the bill of the member for South Norfolk occurred under clauses 26 and 27. Sir G. BowYER asked whether the hon. member was in order in arguing on a bill that was not before the House. The Speakek ruled that the hon. member was in order in discussing matters that were relevant to the question he was bringing before the house. Mr. Seely said he not only wished to have a law passed which should alter the present law in favour of the tenants, but likewise wished to do justice to all parties, and not to have a law which would injure any other class. With that view he was calling the attention of the house to what he considered to be the defects of the bill that was before the house last year. Another of these defects, as he conceived, occurred under clauses 26 and 27, by which i great injustice might be done to the parties who would come after the tenant for life. He was no particnlar advocate for the law as it stood, but if the law of entail was to be abrogated, and the law of settlement was not to be any longer in practical force, let it be done a May with fairly, manfully, and openly, and not by a side wind. There was a farther objection he took to the bill of last year. He objected to the Government finding money for farming purposes. The plea urged in favour of that course was that it tended to improve the cultivation of the laud and increase the production of food ; but, if that rule were to be acted upou, where were we to stop ? He objected to that proposal because, araoug other reasons, it gave to farmers a preference over other classes of the community. The only other defect in the bill of last year to which he would allude was an omission. He referred to the case of the labourer, whose rights ought to be cared for as well as those of the tenant. The bill as drawn would not have given to the labourer compensation for his garden produce in the event of his quitting. All these were defects which he hoped would not reappear in any future measure. The Government was the proper party to bring forward such a measure, and the ex- perience of last year must have convinced everybody of the difficulties which private members must encounter in attempt- ing to deal with the subject. Mr. M'LAGAN seconded the motion. He would suggest that the notice to quit should be extended to at least two years, because a farm tenant was not like an ordinary householder, and might require time to find another farm. He objected decidedly to any interference with the freedom of contract between the landlord aud tenant. Mr. Barciay failed to see from the speeches of the two hon. gentlemen that there was any occasion for the interference of parliament in this matter. At the present time there was nothiug to prevent a farmer making contract about permanent improvements, but nevertheless it was a fact that only in a very small portion of England did arrangements exist between land- lord and tenant with respect to permanent or temporary im- provements. The greater part of the hon. mover's speech was a criticism of the bill of the hon. member for South Norfolk, which was introduced last session, and he thought there was considerable inconvenience in discussing now the details of a measure which was not immediately before them. The prin- ciple]of that bill was that tenant-farmers should be compensated at the termination of their holdings for permanent improve- ments, and that principle was just and equitable in the interest of landlords and tenants. The hon. member for Lincoln had deprecated any interference with freedom of contract, as if that freedom had not been over and over again interfered with by parliament. He need only refer to the Track Act and the Shipping Acts to show that the legislature had again and again interfered with bargains as regarded labour. The hon. gentleman had spoken of this question as principally affecting the tenants on a farm, but it was in reality a question which af- fected very largely and materially the general public interests of the nation. The farmer had not beuefUed by the free-trade policy which had been so advantageous to the landlord and the public ; and the increase in the prices of produce had not been at all commensurate with tl:e increased cost of production. This state of matters could not continue, aud either there must be a reduction in grants of farms or an increased production from the soil. The former remedy was undesirable, because it would be only an alleviation and not a cure, and to efi'ect the latter the tenant must be given some security witli regard to compensation for his improvements. Such a course would stimulate the investment of capital in the soil and would be productive of highly advantageous results not only to the farmer but also to the landlord and the public generally. Tlie tenant-farmers of England looked to her Majesty's Government for a measure dealing with the question. He supported the resolution of the hon. member for Lincoln, though he could not agree with his speech. Mr. Pell said the hon. member for Luu'olu had given very little assistance upon the question of the improvement of land, and had directed his whole efforts against the bill of last year. He ventured to assert that there was no European country which approached us in what we got out of laud. Witli regard to the bill of last year, he objected to the 12th clause because it restricted contracts and could not be carried into effect. Where the landlord and tenant were unable to contract freely all legal impediments should be removed, but that was a law- yer's question rather than one for the Legislature. He should be sorry if any Ministry attempted by any central operation to A 2 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. "■oster or nurse the cnltivation of the land. In the north they •lad a cry for the abolition of the law of primogeniture and of entail, and the consequent splitting up of estates into fractions, but they did not want that. This was a subject which should be dealt with by the Government at a proper time, and not to- wards the end of the session. Mr. C. Garnier said that, as the law stood, the tenant unless protected by express stipulation or the custom of the country, could not claim compensation for unexliausted improve- ments to which it was clear he had a moral right. He thought it was desirable that the Government should deal with the question next year on the basis of the measure of last session, but without the 12th clause relating to freedom of contract. Mr. Downing said he had come down to make a house for the member for South Lincoln, but was greatly disappointed, as the hon. gentleman's speech, so far from being in favour of his resolution, went directly against it. He had expected, too, to hear that the English farmer was oppressed, but the English farmer had been represented as a well-to-do gentleman, who had a seat in the House, who rode his horse with the hounds, and had nothing to complain of with respect to his landlord. We did not deal with the subject in Ireland as they had dealt with it in Ireland, because here we had manufactures, mineral districts, and other occupations to which the populations when turned out could turn themselves. Mr. DiSRALELi said that lie had come down to help to secure a House for those members who had motions to make, and also to hear the speech of the member for Lincoln, but he did not share the disappointment of the member who had just sat down with respect to that speech, which he thought was an extremely sensible one. There were provisions in the bill of last year, so ably criticised by the member for Lincoln, of which he confessed that he did not himself approve, but the subject was not one of such simplicity as some hon. gentle, men appeared to suppose. It had been before the House more or less now for a great number of years — during the long period in which he had sat in that House. When he recollected it being first discussed there we were told by those who complained of the position of the farmer with respect to compensation for unexhausted improvements that there was only one cure for the existing evils, and tliat was that there should be a lease, and not only a lease, but a long lease, and Scotland was held up as a model in that respect ; but the member for Forfarshire, speaking for the tenant-farmers in Scotland, had warned the House that the Scotch system was of all others the one most to be avoided. The contrary opinions which had just been expressed by hon. members showed the difficulty of the question, and he must disclaim on the part of the Government any intention of dealing preci- pitately with a subject of the kind. The subject, however, was one which deserved the consideration of tlie Government, and if they remained upon those benches, as he hoped it might not be presumptuous to expect, a sufficient time to give them |an opportunity of fulfilling their engagements, they sliould give it the consideration it deserved. He objected to the motion of the hon. member tor Lincoln from his dislike to abstract resolutions, but he recognised the general concur- rence of opinion in favour of tenants receiving bond fide com- pensation for unexhausted improvements, and he hoped that a measure might be introduced next session which, if it did not realise all the views expressed by hon. members that evening, would at any rate offer a basis for a practical solution of the problem. Mr. Fawcett said it seemed to him, considering the differ- ence of opinion expressed even by the supporters of the mo- tion, that they could scarcely expect anything more than what had been said by the Prime Minister. He thought that public opinion had not advanced sufficiently to enable them to deal with the question at the present moment. Mr. Chaplin trusted the hon. gentlemen would not press his motion to a division. The resolution was then withdrawn. THE SURREY PRIZE LEASE. The following are the principal terms in the lease adjudged to be the winner of the prize of £10 as best suited for the county of Surrey. The author is Mr. J. L. Hewett, of Puttenham, Guildford, a partner in the firm of Hewett and Lee. The judges were two land- owners, two land- valuers, and two tenant-farmers. Usual description of land and premises. Usual Reservation, -where Right of Shooting IS RESERVED. — That the lessor reserves to himself the right of sporting over the aforesaid lands ; but the tenant may enjoy the joint right equally with him of killing or destroying the ground game from the 1st October till the 1st April. And, moreover, shall and will, every year during this demise, fodder his their and horses in the stables, yards, and gate-rooms belonging to the said demised premises, and house and stack on the same, and use and consume on the same so rented as aforesaid all the hay, straw, haulm, clover, and fodder arising from the same, save and except that the lessee shall at any time during the continuance of this term, except the last two years, have power to sell any quantity of hay or straw, bringing back an equivalent manurial value in dung, artificial, or other good manure ; the manure or compost arising from the last crop but one to be left in the yards or gate-rooms of the said demised premises, cast into proper heaps, and to be paid for as hereinafter mentioned ; and also that all the hay, straw, and haulm grown in the last year of this tenancy should belong to the tenant, unless the landlord should elect to take the same or any part thereof at market price before the ex- piration of the aforesaid term. And that the lessor should, at all times, cultivate the said farm and lands in a good and husbaudlike manner according to the custom of the conntry and rules of good husbandry, and will, particularly during two of the last four years of this demise, and as near as the nature of the soil and size of the fields will permit, cultivate the said farm and lands on the four-course system. Not to underlet without consent. Agreement to keep in Repair, being found Materials. — Tenant being allowed to remove any erections he has himself made at his own expense, if not taken to by landlord, making good all dilapidations. And the lessee shall and will find and bestow upon the said demised premises or on some part thereof for the improvement of the same all the compost soil, muck, and dung arising from the crops of the year next pre- ceding the year of the expiration of the term, being paid as hereinafter mentioned. And likewise will at the expiration of the term before granted leave one-fourth of such arable land in summer fallow for roots, as hereinafter mentioned, and one-fourth part in barley or oats, not less than half of which must be sown with clover or other proper grass seeds, one-fourth clover ley or peas, or bean rush, pro- perly hoed and clean, and fit for a wheat season, and one- fourth wheat. Landlord's Covenants. — Allow Land-Tax and Property-Tax. Landlord to find materials for repairs. That the lessor shall and will allow unto the lessee such tiles for draining as shall be found necessary, the lessee doing the labour of draining the land, in a proper and workmanlike manner, at his own expense, subject to the supervision of the lessor, but in case of the draining being done by the landlord, the tenant to pay 5 per cent, on such outlay. That the lessor shall and will allow unto the lessee for the seeds and sowing, fallows, dung, compost, and manure, and it is hereby understood aad agreed that in THE FARMER'S MAGAZ^E. order to maintaifl and continue the improvement of the land the lessor will pay and allow for the fallows according to their sufficiency and cleanliness, and not by the labour professed to be done for the dung, compost, and manure, whether made from corn, oilcake, or not, at its market value ; also for all corn or oilcake fed on the land the two last years of the tenancy, the manurial value of such oilcake not to exceed 25 per cent, the last year, or 10 per cent, the last year but one, on the market value of the oilcake ; for bones, if used the last two years ; lime, chalk, and marl the last five years. Draining done at the expense of the tenant within the last ten years of such tenancy — all the same to be valued by two competent valuers, chosen iu ths usual way, at what they consider the unexhausted value of the same, taking into consideration the nature of the soil, and whether properly applied or not, the onus of proof of any or all the aforesaid items to be on the tenant, and to be clear and undoubted before they are allowed for. Provided always, and this covenant is with this express coudition, that the tenant should be held strictly liable for ail neglects or defects of cultivation, dilapida- tions, want of cleanliness, breaches of covenants, on all or any part of the farm, the same to be deducted from his valuation, as the valuers in their judgment may direct, the aforesaid valuers being competent, indifferent persons — one chosen by the lessor and the other by the lessee ; and if failing |to agree, to be settled by their umpire, chosen iu the usual way, whose judgment shall be binding and conclusive. Have use of portion of the premises at expiration of the term for thrashing and clearing off his grain. Covenant for quiet possession. Re-entry in case of bankruptcy, &c. Determination of lease at end of years by giving two years' previous notice. THE INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL EXHIBITION AT BREMEN. [from our special correspoxdent.] When the International Exhibition at Bremen was first started, the provisional committee issued a circular, stating that the International Exhibition at Vienna was a universal one, but that held at Bremen would be confined to the following divisions, viz. : I. Breeding animals: 1, Horses; 2, Cattle; 3, Sheep ; 4, Pigs ; 5, Goats and Rabbits. II. Cattle for fattening— fatted cattle. III. Poultry and Singing Birds. IV. Fishery. V. Rearing of Bees and Culture of the Silkworm. VI. Management of Forests and the Chase. VII. Agricultural Products and technical manufacture. VIII. Cultivation of Gardens, Fruit Trees, and Vines. IX. Agricultural JMachines and Implements. X. Results of scientific studies in the above depart- ments. The objects of the proposed exhibition were no sooner made known than the citizens of the Hanseatic town of Bremen and the landowners and farmers of the neigh- bourhood very quickly subscribed no less sum than £15,000 as a guarantee fund, and every encouragement was given to the project by the Emperor and Empress of Germany, the King of Saxony, Prince Albrecht of Prussia, Prince Frederic Charles of Prussia, the Grand Duke of Oldenburg, and the Grand Duke of ]\Iecklen- burgh Schwerin, and each ofl'ered a special prize of con- siderable value. Bremen is a free city on the Weser, with a population of about 73,000. It is divided by the liver into old and new towns. The fortifications have been destroyed, and the ground on which they stood has been converted into public gardens, with running water and sheltered roads and walks. The well-grown trees standing in the grounds are now in beautiful foliage, and must go a long way in giving a favourable impression of the place to foreign visitors. The hotels are large, well fitted, and seem to be well-conducted, and a really good dinner may be had at the table-d'hote, at the best houses, for from three to four shillings, including dessert ; but the dinner-hour is as early as two o'clock. We may further speak of the admirable arrangements made for providing visitors with apartments, and such as might be adopted with advantage to the public at the towns where the Royal Agricultural Society holds its meetings. We are aware there are generally lodging committees, but they do not, as a rule, seem able to keep the price of lodgings within reasonable limit. We will give our own experience of lodgings at Bremen, and leave our readers to form their own opinion as to whether we ought not to be satisfied. More than a month before the exhibition we wrote to the proprietor of Hillman's Hotel, who answered that the rooms at that house had all been taken some weeks previously, as they had also been at the other hotels ; whereupon we wrote to the lodgings committee, and by return of post received a card giving the address of a room that had been taken for us, and filled up, with the notice that for a bedroom and break- fast the charge was to be " five shillings a day." Now we naturally thought (having in our mind what we have paid in our own country) that the bedroom would be dirty and wretched, and the breakfast such as we should not care to have. It was known that we could not arrive at Bremen before 3 a.m., and imagine our surprise when even at that early hour we were kindly received by a ladylike person, who asked if she should prepare us breakfast ; but being very tired after two days and two nights' travelling, we were glad to go to bed. Ima- gine how agreeably surprised we were to be shown into a room 21 feet by 15 feet, and at least 16 feet high, and furnished in a way that any noble- man attending our English meetings need not be dissatisfied with, and more particularly (if he had been of a musical turn of mind) as he could have had the use of what seemed to be a good piano-forte, which stood iu the room. The room did not look into a noisy street, the two French windows opened on to a large balcony, on which were growing orange and lemou-trees, in pots, and beyond there was a square, charmingly planted willi shrubs and fioweriug plants. We are more minute in our description than may seem necessary, but we want our home lodging-house keepers to know what the good people of Bremen did for their visitors. Ours was no solitary instance, for we heard of others equally well cared for, and it will be imagined that there were a good many private lodgings taken when we state that our card was numbered 3,163, We must do the lodging com- mittee justice by saying that in all matters they had to do with they were most kind and obliging — a thing not always to be found in England with men in authority. The exhibition was held in the Biirger, or Citizens, Park, THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. comprising about one hundred acres, aud is williiu ilirce- quarters of a mile of the town. The grounds are ueatly laid out in roads, grass, water, aud spaces are planted with forest-trees, shrubs, and llowering phmts. The buildings for themachiuery, horses, cattle, sheep, pigs, and horticultural, &c., specimens, are erected at different places about the grounds, and it is no easy matter getting round to them all, aud particularly as several of the sheds are so hidden by the young plantations that it is necessary to get up one's geography of the place in order to save our legs by cutting off the corners. A siding has been laid from the railway, and the cattle, &c., are run quite up to the shedding. We could not but be struck by the dif- ference in unloading cattle here and at Vienna last year, where everything seemed in confusion, and after the greatest possible noise and gesticulation the poor half- maddened animals were generally allowed to go out of the trucks with a rush, and in several instances getting free from the persons in charge. At Bremen everything was dift'erently managed. A troop of infantry, in undress uniform, was told off for the work, and most admirably they per- formed their duties, all being done without noise or confusion. No sooner were the cattle-trucks run down to the shedding than twelve of the soldiers (six on each side) placed one end of an unloading ladder on the side of the truck, and the other end, securely fastened, on the ground. The door of the truck was then opeued, and the officer in command gave the word, when in marched] two or three men, as the case might be, and took hold of the animal that was pointed out to them. There seemed no thought or fear in the minds of the men as to what the animals might do ; and it really seemed as if the quiet firmness on the part of the men impressed the cattle with tlie desirability of also taking things coolly, for there were but few instances of open rebellion ; and in these cases the equanimity of the sol- diers' minds did not appear to be the least disturbed, and when the animals were safely placed in their stalls the men turned quietly away as though everything was a mere matter of every-day work with them. The crates con- taining sheep had to be conveyed some distance from the trucks, out of which they were no sooner lifted than they were hoisted on to the shoulders of six soldiers (three on each side), who marched with a military step to the spot where the sheep had to he placed, and then, with what sounded like a kind of one, two, three ! the crates were carefully placed on the ground, without any apparent jolt or loss of the perpendicular. There can be no surprise at success attending the united efforts of an army composed of men so admirably trained. The shedding for the cattle, sheep, and pigs, aud the stables for the horses, are substantially erected, and in ome respects the plans are good. The entire covered width of the cattle-sheds is about from thirty-nine to forty feet, and there is a walk of nine feet wide down the centre, so that visitors may pass down between the cattle, which are tied with their heads to the passage. The faults of these sheds are the centre walk being raised nearly level with the top of the feeding-troujhs, so that the cattle are " looked down upon" by the visitors, and there being no rail in front of the head of the beast there is every chance of a wild animal attempting to jump over the trough. All the shcddings are well constructed and perfectly water-proof. The sheds for the sheep have a covered width of 34 feet, with a seven- feet passage down the centre, There are two rows of pens on each side of the passage. The pens are close boarded, which prevents the sheep seeing each other aud makes them restless, and it is also objec- tionable in hot weather. The stabling for the horses is of an hexagonal form, and is most admirably constructed. The loose boxes are spacious and boarded niue feet high, aud to every four boxes there is an eight-feet passage with folding doors, aud at the other end of the passage is a lock-up hay and corn place. The stalls struck us as being too narrow. They were only five feet in width, while the length was as much as ten feet. Within the ranges of stabling the trial-ground was prepared, having spacious and really good galleries all round, with six divisions raised higher than the rest, these elevated aud more carefully- prepared places being intended for some of the grand people who are expected to visit the exhibition, for the committee aud representatives of the press. Persons who had obtained admission to the general exhibition were admitted to the galleries free of extra charge. The general exhibition was opened to the public on Saturday morning, the 13th instant, at six o'clock, at a charge of ten marks, equal to ten English shillings per head, and as the awards of the jurors were, with some exceptions, made on that day, not less, we think,than upwards of from three to four thousand persons availed themselves of the op- portunity of seeing the public judging, which in all the de- partments was going on at the same time. The morning was an unfortunate one, inasmuch as it was very windy, with a di-enching rain, which, however, happily cleared off about 11 a.m., and then became delightfully fine, and the more agreeable from the rain having settled the clouds of dust which had previously been flying about. When we visited the show-ground on the Thursday previous, it seemed almost impossible that all could be ready by the morning of the 13th, when, however, every- thing appeared to be completed, and the numerous flags, decorations, with plants and flowers gave a varied and very charming effect to almost every part of the extensive grounds, which was very much assisted by several small and handsome erections for seats in many parts of the grounds. The exhibition of horses was a grand one, and has rarely, we were told, been exceeded in Germany, as we doubt very much whether it could be in any country. The classes comprised English thoroughbred stallions and mares, half-bred horses for hunting, riding, and soldiei's' purposes— there being classes for heavy and light cavalry — light and heavy carriage horses, and horses for agricul- tural and artillery work, hackneys, and ponies. The general character of the horses exhibited was remarkably good, and, taking them all round, we never saw a better lot. There was frame, bone, and style, and the action of some of the horses was really grand to look at. There was no attempt at equestrian " show-oft'" on the part of the persons in charge of the horses. All was done in a sober, business-like way, and the minds of the men ap- peared to be wholly concentrated upon doing all they could to develope the powers of the animals which they had in charge. Tlie judges went about their work in a quiet, matter of every-day kind of way, and seemed to get through their heavy duties expeditiously, and we should think satisfactorily. There were pairs of horses shown in carriages as well as teams of four. The horses so ex- hibited were generally beautiful animals, and shown in fine condition, and did credit to their owners as well as to the grooms who had charge of them. There were fewer weedy, worthless animals than might probably have been expected. The grooms were generally dressed in light blue tunics, white breeches, and Wel- lington boots, and wore the Prussian military-shaped cap. Several of the grooms wore soldiers' medals. We were struck by the way the military training helped them in what looked like being a serious affair. A thoroughbred stallion broke away and made a savage rush at another horse, and both went away into the grounds at a furious pace, and were quickly lost to sight THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. amongst the trees and shedding. The grooms at once threw out skirmishers, and in a very short time the horses were secured and taken hack to their places, while the men did not appear at all excited by what had occurred. We should like to have given the prize-winners in the horse classes, but they were not issued before we left the show-ground. There were no English judges for horses, so far as we could learn. To follow the catalogue-numbers of the live-stock sections is rather a difficult matter as the entries are arranged, and more particularly is this so to those who, like ourselves, are not very well acquainted with the German language, and hence it is we are necessarily com- pelled to generalise our remarks more than we should otherwise do. In many classes a bull and cow are entered together, and appear in the same class aud uuder different num- bers. There is a large entry of Holland and Oldenburg cattle, and many very good animals are exhibited. The bulls show a good deal of what we may call improved shape and quality, and the cows while retaining their milk-producing properties seem to be gaining greater flesh-bearing qualities. There is a large class of local cattle, and many really fine beasts are exhibited. It may be clearly seen where a Shorthorn bull has been at work by the increased frame and improved appearance of their produce. There are classes for Hanoverian, Holstein and Ham- burg, Schleswig, and Danish Holstein cattle, and many excellent bulls and cows are exhibited ; while, of course, there are others with small pretensions for merit in a show- yard. The sandy-and-white Swiss cattle are fairly repre- sented, and amongst the entries there are some fine specimens of their breed. AtVienua last year the herdsmen generally appeared in their national costumes, which gave the exhibition more of an international character. At Bremen there is no particular peculiarity in the dress of persons in charge of cattle or sheep. The classes for English aud foreign-bred pedigree Shorthorns is not very well filled, and but for the large entry of most excellent animals made by that spirited aud energetic gentleman Mr. Edward Liibben, of SUrwiirdeu, near Eodeukirchen in Oldenburg, who, by the way, was a pupil some years ago of Mr. Henry Overman, of Norfolk, the Shorthorn breed of cattle would have been badly repre- sented. As it was, Mr. l.ubben came to the rescue with an entry of four bulls of different ages aud thirteen cows and heifers, and of a character, style, aud quality that would have been creditable to any exhibition in England. He deservedly received five first prizes and gold medals, six second prizes and silver medals, and two third prizes and bronze medals. The first-prize white four-year-old bull Snowdrop by Prince Teck is a massive animal, of good frame and well-proportioned fore-quarters, and handled nicely. The second-prize white 1 year and 10 months old bull Fairfax by Prince Teck is an animal of much promise. The first-prize young roan bull. Royal Mark by Royal Broughton, and dam Castanet 3rd, is a really good animal, with excellent forequarters and good skin and hair, and will make his mark in future showyards, or we shall be much mistaken in our estimate of his merits. This bull cannot fail to do a great deal for the improvement of Mr. Liibben's herd. The first-prize cow, Leila, by 3rd Duke of Geneva, dam Laura, is a roan of great substance and evidently a heavy flesh-bearer, and has a good skin ; she is now heavy in calf. The second-prize cow. Charmer, by Hildebrand, is shown with her calf by her side ; and although the cow is low in flesh, having been sent direct from the pasture, she has much to recommend her. The other prize cows and heifers have many good points, but time will not admit of our particularising each animal. In the fat cattle class Mr. Liibben takes two fii-st prizes for pure-bred steers, and a first and second prize for cross-bred steers, as well as the special prize given by the Duke of Brunswick for the best lot of fat cattle in the exhibition. Baron Magnus, of Drehsa, Saxony, took a second prize with his useful bull "Bismarck," and a first prize and gold medal for a really nice heifer, which well earned the honour she obtained. There were two or three other persons who received third prizes, but their animals had nothing very particular to recommend them. There was a class for what is called " common-bred Shorthorns," in which Mr. John Brown, of Hull, takes a first prize and gold medal. There were only two entries for Ayrshire bulls and cows, and both belonging to German breeders. There was a class for other English breeds, and there were only five animals to select from, and three of these were from Mr. Walter Earthing, of Stowey Court, Somersetshire, and he had the first prize for his sixteen months-old Devon buD, and the first prize for his seven- year-old cow of the same breed. The various classes of Merino sheep are well filled, and received much attention from persons interested in this breed. We see an improvement in the general character of Merino sheep since we first attended an international exhibition on the continent of Europe. There appears to be an increase of size, improvement in shape, while the character and quality of the wool is not deteriorated. Nothing could be finer than the wool of some of the animals we examined. The sheep are shown in better condition than they used to be, and we fancy that there must be a corresponding increase in the weight of wool. The classes for Southdown sheep were also well filled, there being 32 rams and 16 pens of ewes. It was said by the German breeders that Lord Walsingham never sent such good rams and ewes to Germany. Mr. George Sandy, of Holmepierrepoint, and two German gentlemen acted as judges for short-woolled sheep, and they awarded to Lord Walsingham two first prizes and two gold medals, with two second prizes and two silver medals for rams, and two first prizes and two gold medals for shearling ewes. Mr. G. Stahlschmidt, of Canea, in Silesia, received the two third prizes, and, singularly enoueh, for rams bred from a Merton ram bought at the Altona Inter- national Exhibition. Mr. Stahlschmidt's two rams were really good animals and such as would have done no discredit to any exhibition in our own country. Lord Sondes, of Elmham, sent three shearling and three two- year-old rams, but they were distanced for the two third prizes by Mr. Stahlschmidt's rams, and failed to receive even a commendation. But we were glad to see his lordship get a second prize for his pen of yearlings, and a third prize for two-year-old ewes, the second prize being awarded to a nice-matching pen of two-year-old ewes belonging to Mr. W. L. Wedesneyer, a German breeder. Lord Walsingham's first-prize yearling ram and the two pens of prize ewes were sold to Baron von Schffiuermarck of Silesia, who bought the prize ewes at the Hamburg International Exhibition some years ago. The first-prize and gold medal two-year-old ram was an animal of great substance and of true South- down character, and was, as well as two other rams, quickly sold to Herr von Tagow, of Riihstadt, near Wils- nack. It is worthy of note that the prize ram was not exhibited last year, aud was hired in a comparatively lean state by Mr. Henry Fookes, of Whitechurch, Blanchford, who could evidently see what the animal would grow into. There were a good many entries in the class for Shropshire and Oxfordshire sheep. Jlr. T. Fulcher was awarded the first and second prizes for two really good THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. Oxford Rams, bred by Mr. Charles Howard of Biddenliam, near Bedford ; while'Mr. J. W. Smidt, who lives near Bremeu, had the first prize for a pen of matching fine ewes bred bj' Mr. Henry Orerman of Weasenham, Nor- folk. Mr. Fulcher received the third prize for a pea of Oxford ewes, which were very badly matched, one having a black, another a grey, and the third a terribly speckled face ; and we were told that the Germans criticised them a good deal, and facetiously wanted to know why three different breeds of sheep were showa in the same pen. This gentleman also sent two pens of Shropshire Down ewes bred by a Mr. Watson. As specimens of a breed they had not much to recommend them, and we fear they would give a bad impression of the merits of Shropshire Down sheep. la the section for Leicester, Cotswold, and Liucolu sheep, Mr. E. Liibben takes two first prizes for some capital rams from Mr. Hugh Aylmer of West Dereham, as well as the second prize for ewes ; while the Cirencester College farm, obtains a second prize for rams and Mr. Fulcher a third. He has also a first and second prize for Cotswold ewes, and the College a third prize. With the exception of the sheep Mr" Liibben had from Mr. Aylmer, we cannot say the other entries were really good. They were just passable, and this is as much as we can say. Messrs. Russell, from Horton Kirby, Kent, sent some useful Hampshire Downs, which obtained the first and third prizes for rams and the first prize for ewes. Some German breeders sent long-wool sheep of considerable merit, and it is quite clear to us that these international exhibitions are doing very much for the improvement of cattle and sheep on the Continent. Mr. J. H.Yeomans, of Stretton-court, acted with two Germans as judge of longwooUed sheep There is a good entry of pigs, and Messrs. Duckering of Lincolnshire and Mr. E. Liibben pretty well sweep off the prizes. Mr. Duckering has five first, one second, and one third, while Mr. Liibben receives two first, two seconds, and a third. The Cirencester College has a first and second prize. There are many good animals exhibited, and some of jNIr. Duckeriag's pigs were of enormous size. We saw a great Hungarian pig at Vienna last year which was so ugly that we thought it must be the con- necting link with soraetMng else, but at Bremen there is a boar which is too terribly ugly to have a connecting link with anything. It is said to be a wild boar for hunting purposes. Now if " pig sticking " is an amusement it must be (in the case of such animals as we taw) i n the kill required to strike such a shadow with the spear. It seemed to have two deep sides and no back or belly to separate them. The brute was savage enough for all pur- poses, for when a curious person attempted to touch the animal with his umbrella, it was, although seeming to be asleep, up in a moment and made a nasty rush at the side of the high boarded pen in which he was confined, and the consequence was that the visitor stepped back so quickly that there was a flooring like nine-pins of some persons behind him. The class for goats and rabbits was interesting, so far as it gave an idea of what extraordinary animals are in existence. There were many singular varieties, and such as we had never seen before. The goats were represented by a male animal of great size and two white females ; their condition being as wretchedly bad as it could well be, and the man who could send such things to an exhi- bition must have queer ideas if he thought any person would commend him for the way he had kept his goats. The exhibition of poultry and singing-birds must be written as a comparative failure. The entries were by no means large, and the birds in bad plumage. There were no birds of any especial merit. There were a good many pigeons, and the carrier variety were good and seem to be well cared-for. The section for fishery was found to be so difficult and impracticable that it was given up. The exhibition of matters connected with the culture of bees and the silkworm cannot be called a success. The articles exhibited were chiefly models of bee-hives, wax, and specimens of honey obtained from different varieties of trees and plants ; and as for silkworms, we could not see any or any of their work, so we supposed they were " out on strike." There is a sepai-ata building for articles connected with forestry and the chase, in which were tastefully arranged numerous specimens of guns and rifles, traps of various kinds, and some of enormous size, heads of animals, polished wood, patterns of inlaid, wood flooring, and many things of great interest, making altogether an at- tractive part of the exhibition. The seventh division — for agricultural products — had much to recommend it. There were specimens of crushed bones, artificial manures, feathers, wool, hemp, manufac- tured hemp, spirits from roots grown on farms, corn and flour, sugar, tobacco-leaf in various stages of growth and manufacture, and a large display of peat fuel. There was peat earth in its soft state and when manufactured ; and in this state it is comparatively speaking as hard as a stone indeed, there were specimens which had been polished, and had a face almost like black marble. The prepared peat is very largely used for the stoves in the best houses in North Germany ; and hundreds of poor persons are em- ployed in getting and preparing the fuel. No wood or other kind of kindling is used for lighting the hard dry lumps of peat. A little petroleum oil is thrown over it, and when a light is applied the flame from the oil quickly ignites the peat. There were specimens of fuel prepared from the sphagnum moss. It is a good deal used, but it burns rather quickly. From what we could see of the peat fuel at Bremen we think that the system of preparing it may with considerable advantage be carried on in England. The judges in these sections have recommended the Council to grant honourable mentions for valuable objects sent to the Exhibition by the President of the Ve- nezuelan Republic, by Messrs. Gildemeister and Co., oi Lima, and by the Mercantile Society of Bremen. A sil- ver medal has been granted to Dr. Ernst, of Caracas, for his scientific arrangement of Venezuelan produce. The section for the cultivation of gardens, and fruit, was very interesting, being in two divisions — one for the exhibition of preserved fruit and vegetables, and also for fruit and vegetables in a fresh state ; and the other for palms, tropical plants, orchids, ferns (tropical and native), as well as greenhouse plants. The fruit and vegetables were by no means equal to what we have seen in England. There were many magnificent specimens of plants, and amongst others, we especially noticed an enormous plant of the Miisa Paradisiaca (bread fruit), with abundance of fruit on it of great size. There was a fine plant of coft'ee with a heavy crop of berries on it. The gloxi- nias were remarkably fine, and appeared to be greatly admired by persons well up in these things. We believe the committee judged wisely in combining flowers and other matters with the cattle exhibition, because it is not everybody who will be content to spend a day ia looking at horses, sheep, and cattle. As it is now, there is sufficient to interest most persons, whichever way their tastes may lie. There was a very fair exhibition of agricultural im- l)lements and machines. The German makers were largely represented, and at many of their stands there were implements which, in an English point of view, were more curious than useful. Probably, however, many of the articles we should not think of using in this country may have their peculiar advantages on the Continent. THE PARMER'S MAGAZmE. 9 Certainly some of the ploughs looked stroog enough to plough up a paved street in any town, and the depth they must enter the soil is something astonishing to think of, and it must of necessity take a good many horses to work them. The following prizes were awarded : The first prize for the best steam plough and the first prize for the best steam machinery for ploughing waste lands to Messrs. John Fowler and Co., Leeds. Gold medals for agricultural machinery and implements to Jlessrs. James and Frederick Howard, of Bedford ; Walter A. Wood, of Iloosick Falls, New York; Marshall, Son, and Co., of Gainsborough; Clayton and Shuttleworth, of Lincoln ; Ransomes, Sims, and Head, of Ipswich ; and Messrs. D. ]\I. Osbone and Co., of Bremen. Silver medals for the same objects were granted to the JIaldon Ironworks Company ; Rennie and Co., Lincoln ; Richmond and Chandler, Sal- ford ; Aultmann, Miller, and Co., Akron, Ohio ; the Reading Ironworks; Nalder and Nalder, Wantage ; Gooday, Stanstead, Essex ; Samuelson and Co., Banbury ; Davy, Paxman, and Co., Colchester; Woods, Cocksedge, and Co., Stowmarket ; James Smyth and Sons, Peasenhall ; C. Burrell, Thetford ; Willsher and Co., London; Hornsbyand Sons, Grantham ; E. R. and F. Turner, Ipswich ; and the Johnston Harvester Company, Brockport. We were glad to see that the English exhibitors did not open their stands on Sunday, and we hope they will be rewarded for this by obtaining good and satisfactory orders. The tenth and last section of the original programme was the " Results of Scientific Studies in the several departments." We tried very hard to make out what this was intended to mean, but were unable to do so, unless it was, as one of the committee said, the good that persons might derive from well studying the various pro- ducts they were enabled to examine, and in seeing how far they could improve upon them. Taken as a whole the exhibition must be said to be a success. We find that on Saturday, the 13th inst., when the price of admission was ten marks (a mark being equal to an English shilling), 5,000 persons entered the exhi- bition. On Sunday, the 14th, 15,188 persons entered, paying two marks each; and on Monday, the 15th, 16,300 paid three marks each. There was a large attendance on Tuesday, but we could not learn the number of persons who entered on that day. The price for admission will be three marks for every day except the last day, viz., Sunday, the 21st inst., when it is to be reduced to one mark, .i very great number of visitors were expected on Friday and Saturday, the 19th and 20th inst., as the Crown Prince of Prussia, the Kingof Saxony, and other persons of rank are to attend the exhi- bition on those days, and during their stay at Bremen they ai-e to be the guests of the merchant prince Herr H. H. Meier, who has been the moving spirit in getting up the exhibition. Without the energy and personal attention he has given to the whole matter from the very beginning the exhibition could not have been carried out as it has been. We believe that Herr Meier visited England twice for the purpose of making inquiries and for personal consultation with persons who were thought to be able to give him advice and assistance. We think however that the persons he consulted shou haveld impressed upon him the desirability of having the catalogue numbers so arranged as to enable persons to understand them, whereas there was as much difficulty in following out the classes as there used to be at the Essex show, and this is saying a good deal ! There was also great and unnecessary delay in putting up the prize cards, and many had not been fixed when we left the show ground on the evening of Tuesday the 16th. Soldiers from the seventy-fifth regiment of the line in full uniform were employed as police in the exhibition grounds, and each had a steel plate with a large " P " pierced through it, hung round his neck and lodged on the chest, which showed at once that the men were acting under authority. The men were placed at every entrance and outlet, in the cattle sheds, and in various parts of the grounds. The men did their duty courteously and quietly, and assisted very much, no doubt, in keeping the really good order which generally prevailed. There were letter boxes in diff'erent parts in the grounds, and a telegraph office with military operators ; and we know from experience that there was no time lost in sending off messages nor, indeed, in letting one have a reply, for we bad occasion to send to England and Austria, and were called up at one o'clock in the morning to receive an answer to a message we sent late in the day. The refreshment department was well organised, and most extensively patronised, and the consumption of food, wine, beer, coft'ee, aud tobacco was of itself a sight to see, while the continual and peculiar " sissing " call to the waiters kept up, as it were, a "phizzing" fire in every "restau- ration." The good biirghers of Bremen right loyally did the best in their power to give a hearty welcome to visi- tors, and, so far as our experience went, there was no attempt at extortion at the hotels or elsewhere, and we can only express a hope that foreign visitors to English ex- hibitions may receive as much fair and considerate treat- ment as we and other Englishmen received at Bremen. Sunday, June 21. — The following additional awards, have bseu announced : Nicholson, Newark, silver medal (or haymaking machines ; Ruston, Proctor, and Co., Lmcoln, gold medal for steam engines and thrashing machines ; Garrett and Sons, Saxmundhara, gold medal for agricultural machines ; Piatt and Co., gold medal for mowing machines ; Singer, gold medal for sewing machines. THE STURDY— AN OPERA.TION.^The disease in cattle and sheep called Coennrus cerebralis, or more popularly known as gid, sturdy, turusick, is one of the most prevalent, but at the same time one of the least understood by breeders and owners of stock. With regard to the usual form of sturdy, it depends on the presence of hyatid in one of the hemispheres of the cerebrum or brain proper. Under its influence the sheep turns right or left according to the hemisphere affected. The first severity of the attack seems to pass off, but the rehef is more apparent than real, the disease becoming more inten- sified, the cerebral disturbance more marked, causing giddi- ness, finally paralysis sets in, followed by prostration and death. Having learned from a gentleman largely interested in sheep-breeding that Mr. William Hyslop, of Stretton House Private Asylum, Church Stretton, successfully deals with cases of sturdy amongst his own and his neighbours' flocks, we waited for an opportunity of witnessing an operation for the disease on a sheep of the Stretton Hill breed. We may premise that the coenurus is in a kind of bladder, provided with a variable number of exsertile heads, and it is believed that the nervous substance may be excited by the heads which protrude from the bladder, and penetrate the brain substance nearly two lines in depth. The operation, like that of Columbus's egg, was exceedingly simple, but very ingenious withal. The sheep being firmly held by an assistant, Mr. Hyslop felt for the softened part of the skull, and having iiit upoa the precise spot he wanted, he pierced the brain with an instrument called a borer. He then drew off a large quantity of liquid from the cist of the parasite, through a canula, by means of a syringe. He then extracted the bladder, which contained the agents of the disease, and announced that the animal would be entirely well in a few days. We have been at some pains to explain the disease, and tlie operation for its cure, in order that those who have sheep afliicted with it may know where to look for a remedy. — Shrewsbury Free Press. 10 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. THE NORFOLK AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT NORWICH. The chief feature of the show was the Shorthorn sectiou, many of the entries, including Lady Pigot's team, now as usual on circuit, coming direct from Bristol, while further interest was given to the awards by Lord Exeter sending two or three of the Telemachus family the old Burghley bull now beating off the Suffolk Oxford which so unex- pectedly was declared the champion bull at the Essex show of last year. The full prize list will also tell of some other corrections, more especially amongst the younger stock, where Mr. How, from Broughton, heat the Branches herd. There was a strong show of the native red-polled cattle, where Lord Sondes was still in front, and a fair entrj' of Southdowns, backed by some capital Cotswolds. Almost all the pig prizes w^ent out of the county, as did many of those for horses ; Mr. Garrett's Suffolk three- year-old, however, of which so much was thought at Woodbridge in the spring, being beaten by a roan from Lynn; while another Cup-bearer was the best two-year- old. On the whole, the horse show was but moderate — perhaps more especially of hunters and other lighter breeds. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES.— Cattle : J. C. Foot, Beaulieu Wood, Dorchester ; J. K. Fowler, Aylesbury. Norfolk Caet Horses : J. H. Plowright, Mansa, Carabs ; J. Wartli, Sutton, Ely. Cart-uorses of j^y Breed : T. Plowright, Pinchbeck ; J. Nix, Chatteris, Cambs. TnoROUGHBRED and Hunting Horses : W. Whitehead, Woollaston ; W. T. Sharpe, Horncastle. Hackney and Riding Horses and Ponies ; H. Thurnall, Royston; J.E.Bennett, Rugby. South- down Sheep : W. Bennett, Chilraark, Salisbury ; H. P. Hart, Beddinghara, Lewes. Long-woolled Sheep: W. Budding, Panton, Lincoln ; T. Horley, The Fosse, Leamingtou. Pigs : J. S. Turner, Cliyngton, Sussex. Implements : T. Everett, Creake ; C. B. Mason, Beech- arawell ; H. Overman, Weasenham. CATTLE. shorthorns. Bull, above three years old. — First prize, £10 and silver medal, and the Prince of Wales' prize of £10 10s., the Marquis of Exeter, Burghley, Stamford (Telemachus) ; second, £7, C. Beart, Westhead, Stowbridge (Master Blythe). Reserved, N. Catchpole, Braniford, Suffolk (Oxford Prize). Bull, two and not exceeding three years. — First prize, £10 and silver medal, W. Linton, Sherriff llutton, York (Sir Arthur Ingram) ; second, £7, J. Wortley, juu., Swalield (Captain Hopeful). Bull, above one and not exceeding two years, — First prize, £10 and silver medal, the Marquis of Exeter (Telemachus 6th) ; second, £7, N. Catchpole (Thiers) ; third, £4, G. J. Day, Horsford, Norwich (Charon). Reserved, Lady Pigot, Branches-park (Rapid Rhone). Bull-calf, not exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, £5 and silver medal, N. Catchpole (The Shah) ; second, £3, T. Rose, Great Melton (Bright Knight). Cow, in calf or in milk, above three years old. — First prize, £10, and silver medal. Lady Pigot (Victoria Victrix) ; second, £7, the Marquis of Exeter (Moll Gwynne) ; third, £!•, J. J. Sharp, Broughton, Kettering (Julia 9lh). Commended : W. Crickmore, Seething (Virginia). Heifer, in calf or in milk, two and not exceeding three years. — First prize, two premiums of £5 and silver medal. Lady Pigot (Rose of Wytham) ; second, £7, N. Catchpole (Bramford Rose) ; third, £4, T. Rose (Brunette). Heifer, one and not exceeding two years. — First prize, £8, and silver medal, J. How, Broughton, Hunts (Lady Butterfly) ; second, £5, Lady Pigot (Princess of Witham); third, £3, Lady Pigot (Rose of Lincoln). Highly commended: J. J. gharp (Julia 11th). Commended: N. Catchpole (Whitton Heifer calf, not exceeding twelve mouths old. — First prize, £5, and silver medal, R. Parker, North Creake (Daisy) ; se- cond, £3, Lady Pigot (Moorish Captive). Highly com- mended: W. Augersteiu, Wecting-hall (Musical 17tli). Com- mended : R. J. Chaplin, Ridgewell, Halstead (Ridgewell Rose). NORFOLK AND SUFFOLK RED-POLLED. Bull, above three years old. — First prize, £10, J. J. Col- man, M.P., Norwich (Powell) , second, £7, Lord Sondes, Elmhara (The Palmer). Bull, two and not exceeding three years. — First prize, £10, J. F. Palmer, Wilby (Youug Major) ; second, £7, Lord Sondes (Edgar) ; third, £4, T. Brown, Marhani (I'lie Beau). Reserved : A. Taylor, Starston (Sir Edward 1.). Bull, one and not exceeding two years. — First prize, £10, and silver medal, Mr. J. J. Colmar., M.P. (Elmham Duke) ; second, £7, H. Birkbeck, Stoke Holy Cross (Suffolk) ; third, £4, J. J. Colraan, M.P. (Easton Duke). Highly commended : J. J. Colman, M.P. (Roy al Duke). Bull-calf, not exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, £5, and silver medal, T. Brown (Charlie) ; second, £3, J. J. Colman, M.P. (Baron Easton). Highly commended: Lord Sondes (Longham). Commended: T.Brown (Benedict). Cow, in calf or milk, above three years old. — First prize, £10, R. E. Lofft, Troston (Minute 3rd); second, £7, B. Brown .Thursford (Countess) ; third, £4 and silver cup, value £55s., j. J. Colman, M.P. (Handsome 3rd). Reservedandcom- mended. Lord .Sonaes (Skelton). Heifer, in calf or in milk, two and not exceeding three years old. — First prize, £10 and silver medal, Lord Sondes (Fanny) ; second, £7, H. Birkbeck (Wave) ; third, £4, B. Brown (Nou- psriel). Highly commended, Lord Sondes (Kate) ; commended, H. Birkbeck (Hyacinth). Heifer, one and not exceeding two years. — First prize, £8, Mr. Hudson, Castleacre ; second, £5, J. J. Colman, M.P. (Rosabelle) ; third, £3, Sir Willoughby Jones, Cranmer-hall (Belle). Highly commended: H. Birkbeck (Spouse) and Lord Sondes (Theresa). Heifer-calf, not exceeding Jwelve months old. — First prize, £5 and silver medal, Sir Willoughby Jones (Graceful) ; second £3, Lord Sondes (Lady Constable). Reserved, H. Birkbeck (Wealth). Best collection of Norfolk and Suffolk Red Polled animals exhibited in classes 9 to 16 inclusive. — Cup or plate. Lord Sondes. Reserved : B. Brown. COWS AND HEIFERS. Best adapted for dairy purposes, of any breed, not being Shorthorn, or Norfolk and Suffolk Red Polled. Cow in calf or in milk above three years old. — First prize, £10 and silver medal, W. Johnson, WalpoleSt. Peter ; second, £7, J. Plowman, Great Melton (White Rose) ; third, £4, W. Johnson. Reserved 'and highly commended, W. Allen, Little Ellingham (Polled). Heifer, in calf or in milk, two and not exceeding three years — First prize, £10 and silver medal, W. Johnson, Walpole St. Peter , second, £7, W. Johnson. Reserved : J. Smith, Hethersett (Dolly Varden, cross-bred). Heifer, oue and not exceeding two years. — First prize, £8 and silver medal, W. Welcher, jun., Ashwelthorpe, Wymond ham (Lady Jane) ; second. £5, R. C. Rising, Costessey. Norwich (Beauty) ; third, £3, J. Smith (Nell Gwynne). fat steers, COWS, AND HEIFERS. Sicer of any breed, above three years. — First prize, £10 and the Prince of Wales' prize of £10 10s., E. Wortley, Rid- lington, Uppingham ; second, £7, R. Wortley, Siiffield. Highly commended : T. and J. B. Freshney, Saltfleet, Louth, Lincolusiiire (yaltfteet). Steer of any breed, not above three years. — First prize, £10 and silver medal, J. How ; second, £7, R. Wortley. Cow or heifer of any age. — First prize, J. Chapman, North Walsham ; second, £7, Duke of Grafton, Euston hall (Spot- less). THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 11 HORSES. NORFOLK CART HORSES Brown, Bay, or Black). Stallion, not under four years. — First prize, £15, H- Stanley, Bury St. Edmund's (Champion) ; second, £7, J. N. Waite, Martham (Major) ; third, £1., Rev. J, N. Micklc- thwait, Taverham-hall (Prince of Wales). Stallion, three years old.— First prize, £10, C. Marsters, Saddlebow, Lynn (England's Glory) ; second, £7, T. Brown (The Orphan) ; third, £1^, J. Newman, Priory, Hiekling (Samson). Stallion, two years old. — First prize, £8, and silver medal, T. Bettinson, Walsoken, Wisbeach (Honest Tom) ; second, £5, J. Martin, Littleport, Ely (Ploughboy) ; third, £3, G. Gowing, Ilellesdou (Young Major). Yearling entire colt. — First prize, £7, J. Tomlinson, Long Sutton (Concjueror) ; second, £4-, B. W. Ground, Jan., Whittlesey. Mare and Foal.— First prize, £10 and silver medal and cup, value £5 5s., J. Tomlinson (Beauty) ; second, £7, C. Beart (Star) ; third, £i, W. Wilson, Scarning (Brag). Mare, not under four years old. — First prize, £10, the City of Norwich premium of £10, and Messrs. J. Geldart and Son's premium of £10 10s., H. Purser, Wellington Manor, Bedford (Honest Lass) ; second, £7, T. Calver, Burnhara Thorpe (Blossom) ; third, £1, J. N. Waite (Depper). Gelding, three years old. — First prize, £7 and silver medal, 11. Horsley, Ashill (Duke). Filly, three years old.— First prize, £8 and silver medal, T. Humphrey, Walpole St. Peter (Dora) ; second, £5, J. Broom, Moulton, Acle (Gipsy) ; third, £3, H. Little, Wiggenhall, (Gipsy). Filly, two years old.— First prize, £8, W. Durrant, Brun- stead-hall ; second, £5, J. Tingey, Little EUingham (Depper) ; third, J.Tiugey (Brisk). Yearling filly.— First prize, £8 and silver medal, H. Purser (Grand Duchess) ; second, £5, B. W. Ground ; third, £3, J. N. AVaite (Duchess). PAIRS or CART HORSES. Pair of cart horses, whether mare or gelding, without restriction as to colour, best suited for agricultural purposes in Norfolk, and wliich have been so uned in the county for twelve months next before the exhibition. — First prize, £10, W. How, Tottington (Brisk and Lawyer) ; second, £7, J, Tingey (Brag and Dodman) ; third, £4', J. Tingey (Doughty and Depper). CART HORSES OF ANY BREED. Stallion, not under four years old. — First prize, £10, R, E. Lofft (Young Cupbearer). Stallion, three years old.— First prize, £8 and cup, value £15 15s., C. Marsters (England's Wonder) ; second. £5, R. Garrett, Carleton-hall (The Claimant). Stallion, two years old.— Prize, £6 and silver medal, R. Garrett. Mare and foal.— First prize, £10, E. S. Trafford, Wroxham (Bunny) ; second, £7, J. Brown, Bawburgh (Diamond). Mare, not under four years old. — First prize, £10, H. Wol- ton, Newborne-hall (Diamond). Filly, two years old.— First prize, £5 and silver medal, W. Wilson, Baylham second, £3, W. Wilson. THOROUGHBREDS. Adapted for Breeding Hunters. Stallion.— First prize, £20, J. Bloomfield, Warham, Fakeu- ham (The Primate). HUNTERS. Mare or Gelding, adapted, equal to 14 stones.— First prize, £15, W. Hudson, Quarles (Steed) ; second, £8, W. Wright, Fring (Cock Robin). Mare or Gelding, adapted for hunting, not equal to carry 14. stones.- First prize, £10, B. W. Cooper, Euston (Gazette) ; second, £5, J. G. Nelson, Sparham (Cupid). Highly com- mended : R. J. Kendle, Weasenliara (Tliree per Cent). Colt or Filly, three or four years old.— First prize, £10, Major F. Barlow, Hasketon (Cornishman) ; second, £5, B. W. Cooper (Grimalkin). Brood mare, adapted for breeding hunters.— First prize, £10, and silver medals, J. Tomlinson (Sloughby) ; second, £5, W. Brandford, Godwick (Phccbe). HACKNEY AND RIDING HORSES. Stallion, for saddle and harness.— First prize, £15, and silver medal, W. Giddens, Walpole St. Peter (Alonzo the Brave) ; second, £8, J.Griggs, South Creake (The Little Model); third, £5, J. Grout, Woodbridge (Quicksilver). Reserved and commended : F. Branwhite, Long Melford (Defiance). Riding mare or gelding, above 15 and not exceeding 15 hands 3 inches high. — First prize, £10, J. Rowell, Magdalen, Lynn (Robin). Hackney mare or gelding, above li and not exceeding 15 liands high, and in the possession of the exhibitor for three moutlis previous to the exhibition. — First prize, £10, and silver medal, W. How (Favourite) ; second, £5, H. \V . Allen's Executors, Saddlebow. Hackney brood mare, to be certified to have produced a living foal subsequent to 1st of January, 1871i. — First prize, £10, and silver medal, C. Cook, Litcham (Bell) ; second, £5, J. W. Hunu, Hunstanton (Twopenny). Reserved and commended, W. Mitchell, AVhitlingham (Eva). HARNESS HORSES. Mare or gelding, not under 14 hands 1 inch, nor above 1 5 hands 1 inch, to be shown in harness. — First prize, £8, and silver medal, W. Durrant. Highly commended and reserved, J. Abel, Norwich. Mare or gelding, not under 15 hands 1 inch, nor above 15 liands 3 inches high, adapted for single or double harness, to be shown in hand and ridden. — Prize, cup, value £10 lOs., W. Giddens (Giddy Girl). Reserved : W. Jex, Burgh St. Peter (Forty Colours). COBS. Stallion, adapted for breeding liigli-steppiug cobs. — Prize, £5, G. Body, Haveringland (Young Prickwillow). Com- mended : Major F. Barlow (King of the West). Commended and reserved : T. and A. Dyball (Little Wonder). Cob, carrying (while being judged) at least 15 stones, saddle and bridle included, and not less than 13 hands 3 inches, nor more than 14 hands 3 inches high. — First prize, £10 and silver medal, — Charles (Cock Robin) ; second, £7, F. Bran- white (Pretty Girl) ; third, £4, T. H. Edwards, Keswick (O'Connell). Commended and reserved : A. Taylor, Starston (Gay Lad). PONIES. Pony, not under 13 nor above 13 hands 3 inches high. — First prize, £8, C. Beart (Tom Thumb) ; second, £5, F. Low (Queen of Spades) ; third, £3, S. A. Goodwyn, Lciston-hall (Quicksilver). Reserved: J. Baly, Hardingham (SirRoger), Pony, not above 13 hands high. — First prize, £5, B. Hook, Norwich (Tommy Dodd) ; second, £3, W. Birkbeck, Thorpe. Highly commended : H. W. Owles, Norwich (Flo). Com- mended : J. Emms, Thetford (Jenny). Pony, not under 12 nor above 13 hands 3 inches, to be shown in harness. — Prize, £5, S. Gardiner, Wheatacre (Mingay). Commended and reserved: T. Patrick, Suttou Wymondham (Match Box). SHEEP. SOUTHDOWN. Shearling ram. — First prize, £10, and silver medal, and silver cup or plate, value £10 10s., J. J. Colmaii, M.P. ; second, £7, Prince of Wales; third, £4, J. J. Colman, M.P. Ram of any age. — First prize, £10 and silver medal, J. J. Colman, M.P. ; second, £7, Prince of Wales; third, £4, Lord Sondes. Pen of five shearling ewes. — First prize, £10 and silver medal, Lord Sondes ; second, £4, J. J. Colman, M.P. Re- served : Prince of Wales. Pen of ten ewe lambs. — Prize, £5 and silver modal. Lord Sondes. Reserved : Prince of Wales. Pen of ten wether lambs, bred by the exhibitor from a flock of not less than five score ewes, size and qii;ility to be taken into consideration. — Prize, £5 and silver medal, Lord Sondes; Reserved : J. J. Colman, M.P. LONG-WOOLLED. Shearling ram. — First prize, £10 and silver medal, T. Browu ; second, £7, T. Brown; third, £4, T.Brown. Highly com- mended : T. Brown. Ram of any age. — First prize, £10 and silver raedal, T. Brown; second, £7, T. Brown; third, £4, T. Thornton, Cavenhara House, Wereliam. Highly commended : T, Brown. Commended: T.Brown and T. Thornton. Pen of two ram lambs. — First prize, £8 and silver medal, T. Brown ; second, £5,T. Brown. Commended and reserved : F. Ellis, Chesterton, Carabs. 12 I'fiE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. Pen of five shearling ewes. — First prize, £7 and silver medal, T. Gunnell ; second, £4., F. tllis, Pen of ten ewe lambs. — First prize, £5 and silver medal, F. Ellis. SHEEP OF ANY BRERD. Pen of ten eve or wether lambs. — First prize, £10 and silver medal, C. Middleton, tlolkham. Wells; secon'l, £7, C. Middleton ; third, J. B. Ellis, jun., West Barshara, Fnkenham. Highly commended and reserved : JMrs. Hudson. Commended : The Corporation of Norwich, Kirby Bedon. Pen of tliree shearling wethers of any breed. — First prize, £7, C. Crawshay, Hingham ; second, £-t. C. Crawshay. Highly commended and reserved : G. Cooke, Ilorseheath, Carabs. Commended The Corporation of Norwich. Pen of ten ewes of any age or breed, from a flock of one less than five score, having bronght up a lamb or lambs. — first prize, £10 and silver medal, T. Gunnell, Milton, Cambs; second, £5, Mrs. Hudson, lleserved : J. B. Ellis, jun. Pen of ten ewes of any age or breed, not being Southdown or longwoolled, having brought up a lamb or lambs. — First prize, £10, and silver medal, Mrs. Hudson ; second, £5, G. Cook. Reserved and commended, J. P. Case, Testerton. Pen of twenty shearling ewes of any breed, without restric tion as to clipping. — First prize, £10, and silver medal, Lord Sondes : second, £7, Mrs. Hudson. PIGS. LARGE BREED. Boar al)ove twelve months old. — First prize, ^£5, J. Dove, Bristol ; second, £3, R. E. Duckering and Sou, Northorpe, Lincolnshire. Boar not above twelve months old. — First prize, £5, and silver medal, J. Dove ; second, £3, R. E. Duckering and Son. Breeding sow. — b'irst prize, £5, J. Dove ; second, £3, R. E. Duckering and Son. Highly commended : R. E. Duckering and Son. Commended : G. M. Sexton, Wherstead Hall, Ipswich. Three breeding sows not above seven months old. — First prize, £5, and silver medal, R. E. Duckering and Son. SHALE BREED (BLACK OR BERKSHIRE). Boar above twelve mouths old. — First prize, £5, R. E. Duckering and Son ; second, £3, J. N. Waite. Highly com- mended : G. M. Sexton. Boar not above twelve months old. — First prize, £5, and silver medal, Lord Rendlesham, Reudlesham Hall, Suffolk ; second, £3, G. M. Sexton. Highly commended: G. M. Sexton. Breeding sow. — £5, and silver medal, G. M. Sexton; second, £3, Lord Rendlesham. Highly commended: R. E. Duckering and Son ; J. N. Waite. Three breeding sows not above seven months old. — First prize, £5, and silver medal, G. M. Sexton. SMALL BREED (wHITE). Boar above twelve months old. — First prize, £5, and silver medal, Lord Rendlesham ; second, £3, G. M. Sexton. Com- mended : R. E. Duckering and Son. Boar not above twelve months old. — First prize, £5, and silver medal, Lord Rendlesham ; second, £3, Lord Rendle- sham. Highly commended : G. M. Sexton and J. Dove. Breeding sow. — First prize, £5, and silver medal, R. E. Duckering and Son ; second, £3, Lord Rendlesham. Com- mended : J. Dove and H. A. Kilham, Tydd St. Marj, Wis- beacli. Three breeding sows, not above seven months old — Prize, £5, and silver medal, R. E. Duckering and Son. IMPLEMENTS. Stacking or elevating machine for straw, hay, or sheaf corn. — Prize, £10, Holmes and Sons, Norwich. Exhibitors: Hambling and Son, East Dereham; Holmes and Sons; Murton and Turner, Kenninghall ; Roby and Co. (Limited), London ; S. G. Soarae, Marshara ; Wallis and Steevens, Lon- don. Turnip hoe or tliinner, for ridge oi flat work. — Prize, £7, and silver medal to inventor. Holmes and Sons. Exhibitors : J. W. Branford, East Dereham ; T. Chambers, Colkirk ; Holmes and Sons ; Hambling and Sons ; Murton and Turner ; F. Mote, March ; T. F. Salter, Attleborough. Thrashing machine drum guard, for the most simple yet effectual plan for protecting the drum against accidents.— Prize, £3, F. Savage, Lynn. Exhibitors : Garrett and Sons, Leiston ; Holmes and Sons ; 1\ Savage ; Woods, Cocksedge, is nd Co., Stowmarket. THE COMMERCIAL PRINCIPLE. Ever remembering that in this Journal the business on the mart and the work in the field receive equal atten- tion, it may not be out of place to look a little into the commercial principle as applied to agriculture. There are well-meaniug men who hope never to see the two come together, as any such union would only tend to disturb the good feeling existing between landlord and tenant. There are others, on the contrary, who maintain that we shall never hold our position or achieve any satisfactory progress until the commercial principle is brought to bear alike upon the investment of the occupier and the interest of the owner. Thus, at the meeting of the Central Chamber of Agriculture the other day. Lord Hampton contended that " the arrangements between landlord and tenant should be conducted much more on commercial principles ;" by which of course his lordship intended to say that the two parties to a contract should set about arranging the terms " fair and square," neither possessing in the outset any unequal advantage over the other. On the face of it this would appear to be Lord Hampton's argument, but we gather from the context it is not so : be would have " no invasion of the great prin- ciple of freedom of contract ;" or, in plain English, he would not wish to see the farmer in a better position to deal with the landlord : " Mv. Masfen would like to know how, if freedom of contract remained, an unwilling land- lord was to be made to do his duty to his tenant ? That gentleman, and others, had assumed that the tenant- farmer was the most helpless being in the world ; and his reply to the question was that, if farmers had to taks a farm from such unwilling landlords as he referred to, they must guard their own interests." There can be no doubt but the time may come, perhaps sooner than expected, when tenants may be able to guard their own interests against " unwilling" landlords, that is by having nothing to do with such people; but so far Lord Hampton must know that he is speaking mere platitudes, as ulIcss a man will do just as the unwilling landlord chooses as to game, capital, cropping, and so forth, the probabilities are the applicant will never get into the farm. Lord Hamp- ton's idea of the commercial principle clearly dates some centuries back, aad refers not so much to English customs as those of new countries, where a smart trader could purchase a small territory for a bottle of whisky, or half-a-dozen wives for a string of beads. The commercial principle as interpreted in such a case signilied simply making a bar- gain on unfair terms, the one side exercising a stronger power than the other ; as it is thus that Lord Hampton would maintain the law between landlord and tenant, the one having everything secured and the other nothing. Indeed, if Lord Hampton's theory possesses any force whatever, it is that the " uavvilling" landlord's property should go gradually out of cultivation. Then, again, at this same Chamber meeting the Honourable Mr. Stanhope declared that " the only cases in which that freedom was now interfered with were those of children, women, lunatics, and Irish tenants, and did the farmers of England wish to be placed in the same posi- tion as those classes of persons ? The Lincolnshire tenantry were satisfied with tke working of freedom of THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 13 - ontract, and not prepared to go in for compulsory legis- lation." Of course all this is not merely outrageous nonsense but at utter variance with facts. So far from freedom of contract being prohibited only amongst women, children, and lunatics, there is, as Mr. Sewell Read was not slow to show, scarcely a class but where the law inter- feres with or watches over the contracts made between a stronger and a weaker power, and thus euables the two to deal on something like terms of equality. Further, what does Mr. Stanhope meau by the freedom of contract with which the Lincolnshire tenantry are satisfied ? So far as we understand it, Teaant-Right in Lincolnshire is not so much a matter of contract but a custom which has all the strength of a law, and one which our aim is to extend. It is a nice question, in fact, whether the "unwilling" landlord — that is, the man who objected to the Tenant-Right — could live in a district where this right was recognised ; and if such an incubus upon the soil should not be permitted to infest one jjart of the country, why should his baneful influence be suffered in another ? It is sufficiently clear how, when Lord Hampton speaks of commercial principles and Mr. Stanhope of freedom of contract, that neither of these honourable geutlimeu knows what he is talking about ; aud as we said last week of the Escrick steward, who sneers at Philip Pusey and Sewell Read and James Howard, and who in the fulness of his heart would not disturb " amicable relations," it would be well if such people could be educated up to the times in which they live. If the Central Chamber of Agriculture will under- take such a duty it might really promise to be of some service. LAVENHAM FARMERS' CLUB. THE ECONOMY OF LABOUR. At the last meeting, Mr. R. Hawkins in the chair, Mr. William Biddbll read the following paper : It has been the practice at tlie May meetings ofthis Club to have a little jollification, comprised mainly in drinking healths and flattering one another, occasionally enlivened by a good song. The Committee, after due consideration, have thought it better for us not to do away with the social tea, but instead of the usual kind of speechifying afterwards, to have a subject to discuss. I have consented to introduce one, which, unfor- tunately, I cannot do but at considerable length ; but the in- ward man having been made comfortable, I am in hopes you may sit it out. The subject is one which sooner or later must have our especial attention, which it has not yet had, owing to the former state of the law, practically compelling us to employ labour, whether we wanted it or not. I shall term it the economy of labour in agriculture. Though I do not anticipate a scarcity of labour, it is as well to be pre- pared for it. Indeed, I think it probable that in a year or two we may have an excess. It is the unexampled prosperity of the last few years which has created such an enormous demand for labour, attracting it from the rural districts into the towns. We always have our ups and downs, and there are already symptoms that some of the great industries of the country are commencing the downward movement. Certainly we now present in our rural districts a very different aspect to what we did 25 years since. Then could be seen in nearly every parish one of the most melancholy of all sights — men able and willing to work, but having no work to do. For only 8s. a-week good labourers were glad to work, and work well ; but even at that low wage the farmers were racking their brains how to profitably employ them, for they them- selves were losing their capital. Assuming then what I do not anticipate, that wages are to be materially increased, where is the money to come from P Under the average of prices for the last 10 years, the farmer cannot afford to pay materially more, and what cannot be afforded will not last long. He will, therefore, take care to have the total sum paid on Friday night kept down. If no other way presents itself he will do it by employing fewer men, paying eight or ten what he has hitherto paid ten or twelve, and adapt his farming accordingly, leaving undone the least profitable work, no longer paying Is. 6d. for extracting weeds, which if suffered to grow would do him only a shilling's worth of damage. This laudable pride of clean farming would soon cease. We shall fall back into the slovenly ways of farming which our continental competitors practise who pay so much less for their labour. Our rural population has been declining for some years. What effect a further great decline produced by emigration would have upon the geueral trades of the country I cannot now stop to inquire ; but most certainly it would be the opposite if beneficial. Judging from the return home of many of our labourers, migration appears of little benefit to them. The emigrant's lot is often too highly coloured. We will trace a single specimen. We will suppose he has attained to the position which appears to be the ambi- tion of every Englishman — he has become owner of a few acres of laud far from any town, miles off any doctor of either mind or body, or teacher of his children, all of which he has here for pretty well nothing, and are necessary for the well- being of any society. With an indifferent market for his pro- duce, he finds his strengtii and the fertility of his land all he has to depend upon. Either failing, he is undone, and he comes to the conclusion that this " Crusoe " kind of life is much better in theory than practice, and that he had better have stayed at home, lamenting that he cannot tell his mind to those who on the most superficial information pressed him to emigrate, and thus render his lot worse. The only speci- men of an emigrating labourer I am acquainted with returned home. He (to his credit) left his master on good terms, a correspondence being kept up betweeu them, iu whicii he at first pictured his new country (one of the Northern of the United States, I believe) in attractive colours, but all was summer then when high wages abounded. Presently the long winter of seven mouths came, which he found hke the lean cattle of Pharaoh which ate up the fat of the others, no work being to be had. Alter a while he, to the great surprise of his master, turned up on his old farm again and asked for work, where he is now employed. As it is full time to con- clude this long preface, I will now proceed to the more prac- tical part of my subject, first considering it in its connection with the cropping of land and grazing. At starting I shall assume what I have no doubt will be correct, that landlords will assist their tenants to meet the difficulty of dearer labour by doing away with what to a good farmer is a financial cruelty— viz., the six months' notice, substituting for it one of a year and a-lialf or two years, and allowing tenants to farm 8s they please, until either party gives or receives notice of quitting. Before proceeding further I would remark that the suggestions I shall make will apply more especially to heavy, and not to light land. The most extensive crops for labour are the root crops we cart off. We grow them not for imme- diate profit, but as indirect feeders lor the corn crops. Full half the manure we make from them is required to be carted back to restore the fertility extracted from the land by the roots themselves. Can we diminish our acreage of these ? I think we can. The question will arise how we can best manurise (convert into manure) our straw. Our whole modern system is I think in fault in carting too much off, and consequently having too much to cart back to our land . Let us then by leaving liigher stubbles take less straw off the land, and manurise part of it by summer grazing. This can be done by green food consumed in wide sheds and barns. The " Belstead Hall ' and other experiments have shown that manure thus made under cover is far better than that made in uncovered yards. The green food would be cut from the layers, which I propose to let grow for two years. To avoid growing small seeds too frequently, we should now and then have to grow sanfoin or lucerne. To prevent loss of acreage of corn crops, these two-year-old layers would be succeeded by 14 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. a crop of wheat followed by barley. If tlie land is too poor to have profitable layers upon, then long fallow it for wheat and follow it by highly artificial manure for barley, making your manure by store beasts fed on straw and cake, which they will thrive very well upon. From Mr. Lawes' invaluable experiments it is conclusively shown that barley can be suc- cessfully grown from artificial manure. For 20 years he has grown it upon the same laad, averaging 48 bushels per acre, and that with an outlay for manure not exceeding £3 per acre. I question if farmers of good barley lands can show a more profitable method than this constant barley growing, especially when we remember it is one of the least costly in manual labour of any of our crops. Mr. Lasves and liis experiments appear to me far too little appreciated in the present day, but the time will come when he will be referred to as one of the greatest lights in agriculture we liave ever had. In the tillage of land I am not looking for any great improvement. Steam cultivation is still too expen- sive to become general, but steam draining is a decided suc- cess, promising to supersede on fair soils all old-fashioned draining. The double plough, the revival of one of our best implements, is now so well appreciated as to require no further allusion. Treble ones are now I understand being made. It is a question whether we could not get our plough- ing done cheaper by having a man work Uro sets of three horses on the double plough, keeping going all day. Where twelve horses are kept, there would be one man's work to feed and change them. We should require only three men under that system to feed and work twelve horses. With 10- inch furrows, ploughing could be done at about Is. per acre for manual labour, whereas witli single ploughs it costs about double. The work being put out, the horses would be kept going, and therefore would not require to be out so many hours, which is so hurtful to them under our present system. It would probably be best for each horse to go two journeys. Harrowing, if done with three horses and 5-yard harrows, would cost 25 per cent, less for manual labour than it now does. Of course the land must be on the flat, which is now gene- rally preferred. If on stctch work, the 4-yard is preferable to the 3-yard work. Furrows are convenient for horse- hoeing, drilling, and inasmuch as the horses walk much easier, for harrowing too. liorse-hoeing both for corn and roots is greatly on the increase. Roots as well as beans are, I think, easiest kept clean when on the ridge. Upon the lighter lands we shall, I expect, eventually see the roots set out by the horse-hoe, though they cost double for singling. There would no doubt be much less hoeing required if we always seeded upon stale land, harrowing it a fortnight before hand. Drilling upon farms of over 200 acres I recommend being done with 3-yard drills. Having to slip the drill through the gates is inconvenient, bat gradually we should convert our nine feet into ten feet clear gateways, resting the gate-head on the hut when shut. Wide (say from nine to ten inches) drilling diminishes considerably the horse-labour, and in hoeing the manual labour as compared with the old 6-inch drilling. No improvement is likely to be made in rolls. I have sometimes found it an advantage to attach a very light harrow behind the light rolls, so that the surface of the land is somewhat pulverised, the better to keep out the drought, and absorb benefits from the atmosphere. As to haymaking wlien cut and made by machines, and gathered by an American rake or toppl?r, I do not see where we can economise further. The glevator spares much hard work, hut it is at present too expensive for small farmers. Reckoning interest of money and repairs to justify purchasing they ought to be worth £6 or £7 a-year to a farmer. On large farms they are probably worth this. For harvesting the modern self-delivery reaper is a first-rate invention. The gain is not only in its speedy cutting, but in leaving the corn so much better for tying. As a gaveller, I think tlie toppler is too little valued, as it saves so much time and labour at a critical period. I have used them for eight or ten years, and hare not observed that if handled with ordinary skill they knock out more barley in gavelMng than when done by forks or rakes. If they cost three times what they now do, I should still use them. My father years back invented a revolving gatherer with three rows of teeth, which did very well. Yesterday I saw at Bury one which, carrying two swathes at a time, and being lighter, is an improvement on his. Thrash- ing is best put out to men at per coomb, and should be so arranged that the xaachine comes upon tlie farm only iiall-a- dozen times a-year, as its removal away often costs in manual and horse labour from 20s. to 25s. On small farms, it is as well to place a wheat and barley stack together, so that they can be thrashed without moving the machine. For root storing it answers very well to fill a barn once with corn, thrash out early, then fill it with roots, having so placed a stack that when threshed the elevator can, through a window, cover them with straw. It is a good plan to clamp roots near a cornstack, so that when the latter is thrashed they can by the elevator be covered with eight or ten feet of straw, par- ticularly if they be placed close to the root house, so as to re- quire no further carting. Some farmers (and I am inclined to agree with them) think that chaif-cutting is now carried on to an excess. It is supposed the more chaff we, so to speak, smuggle into our cattle, the better. How so ? Stock will not fatten upon it, and it prevents them cutting and masticating for themselves, which is more beneficial ; particularly, I think, in case of cart horses. From them, where an excess of cut chaff is given, it can be seen to pass from them merely bruised and quite whole. I am led to form an unfavourable opinion of giving much cut chaff, from having observed bullocks do better on finger pieces of root than on minced. Fences are a great expense to keep neat and effective, and foul the land, hence we. should have as few as possible. I am not sure whether clipped ones are not the cheapest, the clipping being put out by the score rods. It is best to put out work, but the changeableness of the weather renders it difficult at times to do so. Manure filhng and spreading ought always to be done by the piece and stint. Hay carting and stacking might also in most cases be done by the acre. Unless men have been accustomed to take work they are generally indifferent judges of it, consequently the masters must rely very much upon their judgment in such matters The suggestions I have made are rather those arising from recent thought on the subject than from my own practice. Most of them are open to discussion, which I now invite, Mr. Leech thought barley after fallow wheat bad faiming, but barley after clover wheat was good farming. If they had three or four layers and ploughed them up just before harvest they would not want more than half the labour in keeping land clean. Mr. BiDDELL asked Mr. Leech for his experience in re- ference to the two-year-old layers. Mr. Leech said he had had no experience as to that, but he was now beginning the system. Mr. J. E, AVrigut observed that the paper which had just been read contained many valuable hints, and one occurred to him as being very important, and that was the use of cut chaff. He (Mr. Wright) thought there was in the present day a deal too much used. He this year lost a valuable mare owing, he believed, to his man carelessly giving it too much cut chaff. If given at all it ought to be mixed extensively with other articles of food. With reference to the two-year-old layers, his experience was that no kind he had ever left on the land liad answered but sanfoin. When red clover was left a second year he found the land got very foul. He thought it possible to economise labour if they reverted back to the old four-course system, sheep-feeding, &c. ; and if wages continued to advance they would have to keep less horses and employ less manual labour. It seemed to him that they vi-ere now paying what he might term a fictitious price for their labour— they did not get value for their money. There were some good men who earned the money which was paid them, but there were some men who received 2s. 2d. or 2s. per day whose labour was not worth Is. 6d. to the farm. They could no more go on at that rate than certain societies could go on paying men 9s. per week to wear a blue ribbon and do nothing. Mr. ViNCE remarked that the labour question had assumed a serious form. Wlien he first went into business he calculated that 27s. per acre was all that he would have to pay, and he found he could manage it at that ; but now he found that his labour cost him £3 per acre, which, upon an occupation of 450 acres, made all the difference, the amount being £900, whereas, at 27s. per acre it would be only about £600. Some of it was to be accounted for by the extra cropping. He agreed with the observation of Mr. Wright, that if they fell back upon the old four-course system they would be benefited, though the public might have to pay a little more for the pro- duce. He (Mr. Vince) also thought that the two-years' green crop would not answer in anything excepting in ssanfoin. He tried clover once, and then he found that it would not answer. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 15 ^i' they liad more meadow land Iho expenses would be less, and so they would be if tlie Scotch system of growing three green crops before ploughing were adopted. He thought labour had reached its maximum price, and his belief was that there was a surplus of labour in almost every parish in the neighbour- hood. He concurred in the remark that had been made, that farmers did not get the value for the money which they paid to the labourers. For his own part he did not mind paying a good man good wages, but it was necessary for farmers to look closely after their men. Mr. W. Bakek complimented Mr. Biddell on the manner in which he had introduced the subject, and said that gentle- man always brought a vast amount of practical ability to bear upon every subject wliicli he introduced to the Clnb. As to the question of labour, he (Mr. Baker) was sure that if they fell back upon the four-course system they would fiud labour a much lighter item in their expenditure. He had adopted the five-course system ; he had taken white straw after white straw, but lie found in the long-run that he was money out of pocket. There was extra cleaning and other work to do, but the land could not be kept so clean as under the old system, and to that system, he, believed, they would have to revert. He considered that they had spent a good deal of money that might have been saved if they had laid down tlie principle followed by their forefathers. We might pride ourselves in being in advance of them, but the rules followed by our fathers were in the main the right ones ; and whatever people might say about artificial principles it was impossible to make them succeed. It was possible to force a principle, but in the end it would not be successful. It had been said tliat the agricul- tural population was decreasing. In some of the outlying districts this might be so, but in centres like Lavenham and Melford there was actually a surplus. It must not be taken for granted that the agricultural population was diminishing. There was still ample labour for all agricultural purposes. He contended that there was greater elasticity in agriculture than many people suspected, and that if they studied economy of labour they could, if so disposed, create a surplusage ot labour. He pointed out that something like 1,000 men who were in the militia had been called up, and they were not at all missed from the rural parishes ; and he added, that for his own part, he did not employ so many men as he did a few years ago by four or five, and he actually found his work in a more forward state than when he carried on the five-course system. If higher wages were paid some men would be greatly benefited, but it must be at the expense of others, who would have to walk about in idleness. In the course of further re- marks on the labour question, Mr. Baker submitted that the agricultural labourers had benefited as much by the increased prosperity of the country as any other class, and he instanced wages which were paid now, as compared with formerly. With respect to the use of cut chaff, he expressed his belief that to give large quantities of it to horses was very in- judicious, and said the saving (if any) by the use of it was more than counterbalanced by the losses of animals which would be sure to ensue. Mr. Leech said he believed he used as much cut chaff as most ueople. He fed 65 score ewes on it, and a great many liorses. The plan he adopted was to grind it with one of Tilaynard's machines, and allowed it to lay a long time, and mixed it with corn chaff, and if this were done no evil results would follow. He should like to cut barley straw directly after it left the machine. If it was left out all night, and there was any rain, it would be nearly spoiled. If cut chaff was used directly it left the machine it was then injurious. Mr. Brand said he did not agree with Mr. BidJell's sug- gestion as to letting out the ploughing. A good deal de- p( nded upon good ploughing. If land was not properly ploughed it cost more to clean it afterwards than if it was well done at the first. It the men were paid so much per acre they would hurry over the work, and the horses would be unfairly taxed. He contended that it was the business of farmers to use two-year-old horses, and to work them till tlicy were worth more money, and then to sell thera. It must cer- tainly be a wrong policy for a farmer to work a horse out — their business was rather to make them useful, and his fear was that if men were allowed to use young horses on piece-work they might spoil them. He agreed with what Mr. Biddell had saul on the subject of fences. No doubt tliere were miles of useless fences in that country; they were a nuisance to everybody, to master and men. The trees impoverished the land, and thou- sands of weeds were blown from the hedge-rows and scattered over the field. Eor his own part he believed it quite possible to have large fields on heavy land. If it was thoroughly well drained there could be large stetches, the larger the better. It was easy to fold sheep by means of iron hurdles, which until recently could be had at a moderate cost. It was better to fold them than to place them in a small field with ditches all round, for the stock were sure to be in the ditch half the summer time, and all the manure was washed away and spoiled. Witli regard to the question of leaving higher stub- bles, he sliould like to know what was the object in doing that. lie should like to know if that straw which would be left on the ground was worth as much to t!ie ground as 'it would be if carted to the homestead. That straw was worth money, and he could not see the policy of leaving it on the ground. If they had more straw than they really wanted, why not sell it? But he did not find that he had more straw than he could use. With respect to storiug mangolds, the plan he had adopted was to throw the roots into big heaps, and then to thatch them, and if kept water-tight he did not fiud that the frost hurt tiiem. It was well to let the roots lie a little time before covering them up. In reference to the subject uf economy of labour, many people seemed to think that if farmers could let their work the present difficulties would be overcome. He did not hold with farmers letting their work. They got more done no doubt, but the work was generally of a very indifferent kind. No doubt there were many useless jobs which the men were set to do, and many farmers kept three men where they had no business to keep more than two. Mr. Gardiner said he could never see the policy of growing mangolds, considering the cost it involved. He knew a gen- tleman who was as good a farmer as any in the county. He was in the habit of growing fifty acres of mangolds. He had to put on twelve loads of manure per acre, beside some arti- ficial. He had to go to the expense of carting them home, and to keep thera ; but what virtue was therein them to make corn grow ? He (Mr. Gardiner) calculated that they oost ^15 per acre, considering that the land was impoverished for several crops following. The CiiAiRiLVN then summed up the discussion, remarking at the outset that they, as a Club, were greatly indebted to Mr. Biddell for his interesting and practical paper. There was one thing, however, that gentleman had omitted to refer to, and that was as to the use of agricultural machinery in economising manual labour. He (Mr. Hawkins) did not intend to argue that the use of machinery necessarily economised labour, but there was no doubt machinery had done very much for the farming community. If they could get their grass and their corn cut quickly it was a great advantage, but as to how far labour was economised in a financial point of view was quite another matter. In the course of the discussion which had taken place, it had been suggested that one way of meeting the labour difficulty was to revert back to the old four-course system. He did not agree with this, and for one was not prepared to advocate the plan of economising labour. They had the public to feed, and under the four-course system the land would not produce what it did under the system more generally followed. Besides, ho did not now consider it necessary. Many landlords had been very kind, and had given leases to persons who worked the laud fairly and consistently, enabling farmers to farm just as they liked. They could grow all they liked, and such farmers would hardly find it to their interests to economise labour in the manner suggested. The labourers had very greatly benefited by the system which had been of late gene- rally pursued iu the cultivation of the land. They now had opportunities whicli they had not enjoyed for, he might say, generations. One-fourth of the land was not now under fallow as formerly, but almost the whole of it was under cultivation, giving men the opportunity of being employed. Mr. Hawkins referred to otiier matters which had been raised in the course of the discussion, and he s:ud he did not think that farmers would suffer so much from emigraliuu and migration as many would lead them to suppose. He also spoke of the happy position the farmers were in just at the present juncture, owing to the very favourable season they had enjoyed for farming operations. Mr. Biddell then replied. He was very glad to find so practical a man as Mr. Leech agreeing with his views as to having two years' green crops and taking two years' corn crops, 16 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. if they had to pay a higher price for their labour, which he (Mr. Biddell) did not anticipate. One of the greatest argu- ments against it was the dryness of our climate. The grasses, ike, would not grow here as they did in those places where there was more rain ; but at the same time he thought they might find it to answer their purpose to adopt that system. He argued that red clover would hardly do to lay two years, but he imagined that they could have layers composed of mixed grasses that would. A mixed layer would he thought grow profitably for two years. Mr. Viuce had referred to the large increase which had taken place in the cost of labour since he had been in business. That fact alone must rebut a good deal that had been said of lale about the labourer not having shared in the general prosperity of the country. The returns showed that there had been a decrease in the agricul- tural population, and this fact, coupled with the other that farmers paid a great deal more, was conclusive to his mind that the labourers had got un '" ♦' world. The position of the labourer had been and might be benefited in this way, but he had no confidence in those artificial attempts which had been made of late to force up the rate of wages faster than was reasonable. Several speakers had recommended that farmers should go back to the old four-course system. That was the very thing he was getting tired of. When he recom- mended the two years' layer and the two years' corn crops, he did not of course recommend that the whole farm should be so treated ; but he was convinced they would require much less manual labour under that system than under the four-course. With respect to Mr. Brand's remarks, a good deal that gentle- man said might be perfectly correct provided everybody had nice level land as he had at Waldringfield, but the case might be different on the strong heavy lands such as were to be found in the neighbourhood of Lavenham, He (Mr. Biddell) had come to the conclusion that good horses were quite as cheap to work on land as colts. As to letting the ploughing, it should be borne in mind that the horses would not have to go the hours they now did, and to his mind the less the number of hours that horses were out the better, as they were often left standing about when they were hot, which was their ruin. If men were allowed to earn a good wage there would be no- thing of the sort, as the men would keep the horses going, and they would go fewer hours thau they did now. With respect to leaving tall stubbles, he remarked that it had been said by an eminent agriculturist that straw was worth 15s. a ton to plough in, and if that were so it was hardly right to cart off all they did, straw being so bulky a commodity that it could not be taken to a distant market with profit. It was hardly right to cart lots of straw off the land to make a lot of inferior muck to cart back again — it was certainly wiser to make better manure with less straw. The Chairman had charged him with having said but little on the subject of machinery. He was a thorough advocate for the use of reaping machines. Last year he spent something like £70, and as far as he could see the benefits were shared between him and his men. They had received just as much benefit from the machines as he had. How long farmers were to go upon that system he did not know. A vote of thanks was accorded to Mr, Biddell for his admirable paper. THE ROYAL AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY'SMEETING AT BEDEORD.— This, by the entries, will he the largest show, alike of stack and implements, ever held ; all tlie Cattle classes being capitally filled, and the nominations in the several sections of horses being something extraordinary. THE BATH AND WEST OF ENGLAND MEETING AT BRISTOL. — Mr. B. St. John Ackers' white bull Cymbeline was highly commended in the old class of Short- horn hulls. It is alike discreditable and an act of injustice to exhibitors that the Bath Society does not issue an official and intelligible prize-list, after the manner of the Royal Agricul- tural Society. AN ABERDEENSHIRE FARMER IN CANADA.— I have resided forty-five years in Canada. Thirty. five years I have been a farmer. I began in the woods two miles from a neighbour, and, I may further state, I am an exception to the general rule. I paid £100 for a half-lot of 100 acres. I had £150 in money, a strong healthy constitution, a wife and three infant children. There was no school or church, and we were 15 miles to a mill, 14 miles to a store, and I had to carry my flour on my back two miles, and had to go seven miles to buy a ham, and that tlirough the trackless forest, with tlie wolf, the hear, and the deer. I bought a yoke of oxen, and lost one by death, and was cheated out of the other. My best cow got her leg broken, and I lost her. My wife was taken sick, and was so for three years, and could not wash a cap for her head. I liad almost lost my life when rolling logs on a heap, had my neck almost broken and my teeth thrust out by the blow, and for one year was unable to work. I paid 43 dollars for two visits to an M.D. I have lost ten cows, besides oxen, sheep, and hogs. I have bad crops. I have got 30 bushels of wheat to an acre, and at other times not two bushels. I paid 16 dollars an acre for clearing and fencing, and many a night have had to work until nearly morning fighting fire from my clearing. After all, I am considered one of the most successful farmers. When I look around, and see how few of my old neiglibours are left, I am lost in wonder at seeing how many have died. There are just a few left, and our burying grounds are well tenanted We had ten children, nine of whom are alive, but the money bills for medicine are incredible, and to tell you the truth no pen can do justice or pourtray the hardships of bush life. The winter is excessively cold, and to-day we may plough, but not sow. Summer is excessively hot. A labourer with you can work out off doors at all times. Not so here. We have six months steady winter, and about four months warm. The frost a few days ago was two feet deep, and our fall wheat is badly winter-killed. It won't be half a crop. There is no hay ; the grasshoppers took it all, and the Colorado beetle ate all our potatoes. There is nothing we plant which will pay for the labour, and our youth are leaving and going South to the United States. And yet we pay idlers to go and tell what a fine country Canada is. Those who are persuading your people to come here are not your friends. They are paid to do so. I am not. I tell you, beware and look ere you leap. I may send you the report of the Crown Lauds. There are nearly 70 townships surveyed, but beware, be not too confi- dent. You gain Uttle by coming to Canada, and lose much. If I made a mistake in coming here, I hope others may profit by my experience. I am from Aberdeenshire, and a graduate of the University. I am now the owner of five good farms, and would gladly sell to get away. For the farm I live on, I was offered a thousand pounds twenty years ago, and I cannot now sell at any price. — Scribendee in the Banffshiie Journal. FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE.— A supplement to the London Gazette of Tuesday contains the following Order, which may be cited as the Foot-and- Mouth Disease Order of 1874: Article 28 of the Animals Order of 1871 shall extend to authorize a local authority to make regulations for prohibit- ing or regulating the movement, as therein provided, of any animal affected with foot-and-mouth disease ; but nothing in this Order, or in any regulation of a local authority thereunder, shall be deemed to authorize the movement of any animal in contravention of section 57, or of any other provision of the Act of 1869. Article 5 of the Animals (Amendment) Order of 1873 is hereby revoked. When an animal become affected with foot-and-mout'i disease wliile exposed, or placed, or being carried, led, or driven us in section 57 of the Act of 1869 mentioned, it may, notwitstanding anything in that section, be, with a licence of an inspector of the local authority authorized to issue the same, but not otherwise, moved for purposes of feeding, or watering, or other ordinary purposes connected with the breeding or rearing of animals, to any land or building in the occupation of the owner of the animal, or for slaughter to the nearest slaughter-house, or some other sleughter-house approved by the local authority. SALE OF THE COBIIAM STUD YEARLINGS.— At the second sale flie thirty-three lots realised 9,570 gs., or an average of 290 gs., which shows a falling off compared with last year's, when an average of 383 gs. was obtained for thirty-four lots. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 17 EAST LOTHIAN FARMERS' CLUB. THE CHEMICAL DEPARTMENT OF THE HIGHLAND AND AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. At the monthly meeting, held at Haddington, Mr. Gaukrogee (Southfield), in the chair, said : The subject for discussion to-day is "What should the Highland Society do in regard to the chemical department in order to confer the greatest benefit upon the agriculture of Scotland ?" It is not necessary to refer to the importance o f a scientific education or of the establishment of an agricultural college for Scotland. As you will observe our discussion refers only to what we think the Society should do in regard to its chemical department. The matter we have to consider is of paramount importance to every person engaged in agriculture. Let anyone consider for a moment the amount laid out for artificial manures and feeding stuffs in this country alone, and he will find that iu very many cases the sums paid for them is equal, if not above, the rent of the land. There are many gentlemen in this room who pay more, year by year, for these articles than they do for rent and taxes combined. If, then, this subject is so weighty to us in a given district or a county, it is necessarily more so to the agriculture of Scotland. I believe, moreover, that the sums paid by the the farmers of Scotland over and above what the manures are worth from being deficient in quality is incal- culable. Farmers do not generally get their manures analysed, but the facilities for doing so would be considerably increased and the cost trifling were the Highland Society to appoint a first-rate chemist, with headquarters in Edinburgh, and, if found necessary, appoint assistants under him in different districts. I am not at all clear that it would prove beneficial to the department or promote the interests of agriculture were the Society to endow a Chair of Agricultural Chemistry, as is advocated in some quarters. I have some misgivings in this respect. What I think we desiderate is a first-rate, active, energetic chemist, whose whole time should! he devoted to, and position depend upon, the manner in which he does his duty to the Society. Supposing the Highland Society were to offer £400 or £500 a year as salary, and £100 each for two or three assis- tants, this would, with the large amount of fees collected, even were tlie fees on a very low scale, put this department in good and thorough working order. The Society is wealthy, and nobody will gainsay that one of the best purposes to which it could apply some of its funds is in providing a high-class and well-appointed chemist. With these few remarks by way of opening the discussion, I shall now be glad to hear what the members have got to say. Mr. Smith (Stevenson Mains) said : Since our last meeting, when tiiis subject was proposed, a good deal has been said and written on it. To a certain extent, therefore, our dis- cussion has been anticipated. However, as the directors have still to decide what form their efforts are to take, it can do no harm to talk the matter over here. A good many sugges- tions have been thrown out for the Society to adopt, some of which I approve, others I do not. That the Society should make arrangements and apply its funds for the purpose of having its elements of agricultural chemistry taught in our public schools, I do not approve of. I think this is matter for Government or for the country at large to see to. We have just had an Education Act passed, an Act tliat will by the carrying of it out entail great expense on tlie community at large, but I hope, and have no doubt, it will be the means of greatly improving the education of the people, and if, as I have suggested, the elements of agricultural cliemistry are taught in all our public schools, it will be paid for by the people, and they will reap the advantage in course of time of that education being brought to bear on the progress of agri- culture, which is a nation's wealth. Sir, it seems to me tlie Society ought to appoint a first-class man as chemist, and one who would devote his whole time to the interests of the So- ciety and agriculture, and be paid a fixed salary for doing so. I would deprecate the Society's chemist being to a certain ex- tent dependant upon fees for analysis of manures, &c., as part of liis remuneration. Much harm has been done to the pockets of farmers by the facility whereby manufacturers of manures can have a chemist's analysis of the commodity they wish to sell written out in a form agreeable to their own re- quirements, and in a way in which they may mislead many farmers who are not themselves acquainted with analysis. It is of the utmost importance tliat farmers should have the means of having the commodities they purchase, whether manures or feeding substances, tested by analysis, conducted by an able chemist who is independent of the fees drawn there- from, and I see no better way of getting at this than through the agency of the Highland and Agricultural Society. Another very important duty of the cliemist would be to brinfr the science of chemistryto bearon practical field experiments. Bythismeans the cultivation of land may become more of a science tlian it is at the present day. For this purpose the Society would re- quire the services of a practical farm.er. These experiments 1 would have carried out on different farms in different parts of the country, and not on what is called a model farm. I anticipate there would be no difficulty whatever in securing ground in different localities for this purpose. Mr. Paton (Standingstones) said : Before discussing the subject in question, perhaps we might look for a minute at what the Society has been doing in the past. I understand the Society was at first formed for the advancement of agri- culture generally. At that time farming was not conducted on such scientific principles as it now is. Then there was no such thing as guano or nitrate of soda used. What are now called artificial manures were not even dreamed of. As the funds and membership of the Society increased, more money was given for the best animals and implements exhibited, and to such perfection have these animals been brought that it is doubtful if much more can be done in that direction. By- and-by bones and rape dust began to be used as manures. The former suited light soils, the latter told well on clay. It was found, however, that by applying acid to the boue they could be used profitably on heavy soils, as well as on light. Some farmers, a little more enterprising than others, made double the quantity they required themselves, and supplied their neighbours, and by-and-by, finding that supplying their neighbours paid even better than supplying themselves, made a business of it and left farming for good. However, after a little practice, the clever ones found that, with the help of a little acid and a pinch of guano, they could make artificial manure of any given thing, and the best of it all, at a handsome profit. Some, by accident or mistake perhaps, forgot to put in the bones or guano, and although the honest farmer did not know any difference, the turnips proved badly. Hence the value of a chemist to prevent such mistakes recurring. In recent years the chemist of the Highland Society, as well as many other cliemists, have been invaluable to the farmers of Scotland. But is it not just possible that too much reliance may be placed in chemistry? Can it be trusted in every case that it takes in hand ? We are almost inclined to think that, if relied too much upon, in some cases it is apt to mislead. Chemists tell you that if you apply ammonia and phosphates to almost any crop they will act like magic, especially if the soil be poor or the crop sickly, and practice corroborates this. But, again, chemistry will tell you that rapecake will feed a bullock as well as oilcake, or that the tops of turnips contain as much nutriment as the bulbs ; but to this practice decidedly says, No. Or again, it is found by practice that a manure composed of dissolved bones and nitrate of soda, analysing the same as the best Peruvian guano, will not produce effects equal to the latter. On this account, I fear we have been trusting too much to theory alone, both as regards cakes and manures. We know that if we get pure guano, or pure oilcake, or a well-made manure containing so much ammonia and so- luble phosphates, it is sure to show good results, if properly applied under favourable circumstances. To know if we obtain this, however, is the question, and the Highland Society's chemist has, at a comparatively moderate charge, been ready to assist farmers by analysis. Since the appoint- ment of the late professor, liowever, the business done in manures and cakes has assumed such a gigantic form, and the adulteration has been practised, in many cases, to such an extent, that the Society ought now to have the beat chemist that can be had entirely for itself. The Society is wealthy. The question is of the very utmost importance to the country B 18 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. generally ; therefore let the salary be liberal, and a good mau will be got, seeing that such an enorraoas sum is spent every year by farmers on what is called artificial manures and cakes, and these, in ninety cases out of a hundred, the farmer knows little himself about. Jlow can he ? I doubt if even the chemist himself is very sure sometimes what to say about it. Such being the case, will the Society do what is right if it does not do its very best to protect the farmer and the honest dealer, and put down the rogue ? One or two assistants, not apprentices, paid by tlie Society, would be also requisite to do the thing well. By attending the principal grain markets now, and tlien farmers would be able to consult them readily and get their advice, and by charging a small fee for such advice I have no doubt but they would make money by their visits. Farmers as a class don't care to send samples to Edin- burgh, far less to go there and consult a chemist. Some may think this impracticable, but I hold that it would do more good to prevent farmers being victimised than anything that lias yet been done by the Society. I hold also that by the chemists meeting and talking over matters with the farmers both would be greatly benefited ; for how can any one be a thorough agricultural chemist unless he knows something practically about farming? The farmer and chemist must work together to attain the best results. Adam Smith, in his " Wealth of Nations," says, and I believe it has never been contradicted, that " no equal capital puts into motion a greater quantity of productive labour than that of the farmer." Seeing that since this was first written about three times the amount of capital is now required for the same extent of land, is it not to be deplored that the farmers of Scotland still go about their business in a very haphazard way, groping in many cases in utter darkness, and investing their capital in many things not the right ones ? Tarming is in this respect unlike other businesses. How would a corn merchant or a butcher succeed if he did not know to a nicety what he was buying from the farmer ? Still, it is for no want of shrewdness that the farmer is so much at the mercy of the unscrupulous merchant. Let any retired successful merchant or trades- man begin farming, and he finds he is equally at sea when he goes to invest in manures or cakes for his farm. Hence the crying necessity for the directors of the Society exerting themselves to the very uttermost to secure to the farmers of Scotland full value for their money. Here I would find fault with the Society in the past. Cases ot the grossest adulteration came 'o the knowledge of their chemist, still that was kept quiet, and no names were given to the public. I ask if that was creditable to the Society, or was it fair to the farmer or the honest dealer ? It almost showed a want of moral courage on the part of the Society. The Royal Society of England does very difi'erently, and several such cases have been exposed. I hope in time to ,' corae that ours will do the same. I know the fair dealer } wishes it, and it would only be a matter of kindness to the unprincipled dealer himself to be stopped in his ways of wicked- nes". The profits in many of these manures and cakes are sometimes tremendous. At all times they are good, and when an agent can be allowed in many cases from £1 to £3 per ton, it is not difBcult to imagine what the maker's profits will be. The whole thing bears absurdity on the face ot it. Go into any of the principal corn markets at present, and T am confident I am not overstating when I say that at least every third man and sometimes a larger percentage is in the manure, cake, or seed trade. This very circumstance shows that the trade is profitable. They must all do more or less business or they could not live. "What we ask the Society to do, tlien, is to " save us from our friends." And again, I repeat, by having a chemist authorised by the Society appearing pretty often, especially in spring, at our markets, it would, I hold, be the most useful and best thing the Society has yet done for the benefit of the farmers of Scotland. A great deal of late has been written about education generally, and not a little about agricultural education. The other week we had a pro- fessor of agriculture, aud also a factor, strongly recommending the appointment of an agricultural chemistry chair. To that I would just say, wliat might the average attendance be ex- pected to be ? Surely there are chemistry schools enough already, and any one wlio has a taste for such things can have his attention directed to any particular subject in the labo- ratory. I hold that there is little need for a chair of agri- culture, and less for one of agricultural chemistry. Fifteen years' experience has proved what I say as regards the former to be correct, as witness the very small attendance — not that there is anything to be said against the professor, very far from it, but it is found tliat more can be learned as regards practical farming from a shrewd rent-paving fanner in his every day work en his own farm than within the walls of a university. But some may say it is surely a good thing to be able to analyse your own purchases of manures, &i;. True, but though some may be able to do that while at the classes, I doubt if any could trust themselves to do it after being one or two years busily engaged on a farm. Their chemical stuff get old, their minds are fully taken up with the practical work of the farm, and if they are keen farmers they would rather hand it over to the chemist, who is daily at it, than be bothered, and perhaps fail in the end. Besides, the merchant would not take the farmer's analysis. Then, again, an agricultural sta- tion or farm, under the direction of the said professors, have been spoken of — and near Edinburgh, of course, it would be. That might suit proprietors' sons or any who wished to make themselves a little acquainted with agriculture. I confess it is very pleasant to attend these lectures, but anyone who has been brought up on a farm, or who has been a year or two with a practical farmer, learns very little indeed. I speak here from experience, and I feel quite confident that for any young man to spend three or four years at an agricultural college, or on a farm connected with it, is not taking the best means to become a thorough practical farmer. Should he have a great taste for science or agricultural literature, he is almost sure to turn his attention to that, and when he gets a farm of his own he does not care for looking after the details, and is no likely to have a real interest in stock, and therefore will never farm with pleasure, and his heart will never be in his work ; or should he not have a taste for liis studies, then he is losing his time and money, is very apt to get fond of bitter beer and tobacco, and idleness, and perhaps set a bad example to those whose intentions were good. But supposing a model farm were started near Edinburgh, not one of the farmers of that district would change their prasent style of farming, and any experiments made there would be of little use to those living twenty or a hundred miles distant. So far as experimenting goes, to be worth anything it must be done in different dis- tricts by some practical rent-paying farmer who has a taste and a pleasure in conducting such experiments. In a word, I doubt if chemistry will do much more for some time to come than it has already done in unfolding the mysteries of the soil and vegetable and animal world, but it has come to a great height already, and it only requires that that knowledge be properly directed and brought to bear practically on agricul- ture. A farmer knows, or ouglit to know, something about most of what he buys, with the exception of manures, cakes, and seeds, but iu all these he is often taken in. Therefore let us have good chemists always at hand, under the superintend- ence of the Highland Society. A premium was lately given by the Society for an essay on " What has Chemistry Done for Agriculture P" It strikes me forcibly that chemistry has done a precious deal more for the manure merchant and the lairds than it has done for the tenants, for were the farmers' profits not larger some thirty years ago, when £100 went as far as £200 does now in stocking a farm, when rents were little more than half what they now are, and when an artificial manure merchant of the present day would have been looked upon as a curiosity and a lunatic had he presented himself iii Had- dington market with his bottles and samples of Calces o' fossils, earths, and trees, True Salraarinum o' the seas, The farina of beans and peas. He has in plenty ; Aqua fortes — what you please He can content ye? Mr. Shereiff (Saltcoats) paid a high compliment to the attaimeuts of the late chemist of tlie Society — Professor Ander- son. How tlie society were to fill Professor Andersoa's place was a difficult question to answer. He agreed with Lord Kinnaird's views on this subject, expressed in the letter sent by his lordship to Mr. Wilson, Eddington Mains, and pub- lished in the newspapers. Mr. C. Smith, Whittingham, said there could be no ques- tion about tlie practical knowledge of agriculture being of the greatest possible importance. Tiiere could be little question also that the mau possessed of tlie scientific knowledge bearing on agriculture, when combined with practical experience, was THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 19 in a more advantageous position, was a superior raau, and was more likely to be successful than the mere practical farmer. At this juncture they ought to express their opinions, and look to the future as well as to the present. No doubt at present the great interest with farmers was to secure unadultered manures and feeding stuffs : but, keeping in view what was desirable for the future he held it was not enough that the Highland Society should simply procure a chemist of high standing. They should also endeavour to make provision for, and encourage the education and training of the young iu the sciences bearing on agriculture. To tlie young they must look for the future of agriculture, and while it may have been that in former times men of ordinary qualifications were sufficient for developing and carrying through their farming operations with the then knowledge and the then use of im- plements and light manures, they were at a very different time of day now. It would be a retrogade movement altogether if they were in the least degree to slight anything calculated to forward or raise the educational and scientific attainments of all those connected with agriculture. Some men seemed to think there was no field for the mind in agriculture — that it was mere clod-hoppers who were engaged in it, and if a man wanted scope for the intellect he must turn himself to some- thing else. Tiiat was a delusion. Of course if a man stuck merely to the practical, there might:'be something in the direct- tion of the treadmill about it, but if he occupied his mind in- vestigating day by day and studying the phenomena around him, he will find plenty of mental occupation about farming. They should give forth no uncertain sonnd on the question now before the club. So far as the Society's means and in- fluence could go, scientific education should be encouraged. The Society's aid and influence could not be better bestowed. A man of science was apt to be rather ignored because he was not practical, but what was wanted was a combination of the scientific and the practical. If tiiey got the young farmers thus trained, he was sanguine of great pro- gress in agriculture. Mr. ScOT-SiviRvmci said he was glad he had proposed this subject to the Club, for it had elicited a very interesting dis- cnssion. The Higliland Society had a capital of about £60,000 ; but it was not in their power to do so much as had been proposed. lie would have them first to consider what chemistry had done iu the past for agriculture. He had a profound veneration for science, and he might say lie was profoundly ignorant of it ; but, as a practical man, he pro- tested against the statements that had been circulated by cer- tain distinguished parties of late to the effect that science would increase the produce of the soil by from one half to one-third. He did not believe chemists or scientific men had so much to teach them as they said they had. Why, if they looked at the past, they would find that they were not indebted to chemistry for the application of bones to the land, which was one of their greatest improvements. They owed that to a Yorkshire farmer. He (Mr. Scot-Skirviug) had found out how to make the grain crops grow, and he challenged all the chemists in Europe to tell him how to make tiiese crops stand up. If they applied plenty of good manure they could make crops grow, but they could not make them stand. As he had already indicated, he had no wish to slight the importance of science, but tlie reverse ; and he believed that gradually the scientific man and the practical man working together would result in a considerable increase in the produce of this coun- try. As to tht appointment of a first-class man as a chemist, he had no hope of getting such under £1,000 a year. Then the question came to be whether, having regard to the avail- able funds of the Society, they would not have to fall back on the second-best class, and perhaps appoint three or four young men — stationiner one at Edinburgh, one at Glasgow, and one at Aberdeen, and so on. Mr. DuilIE : One at Inverness. Mr. Scot-Skirving : Yes ; perhaps one at Inverness. He objected entirely to Mr. Smith's proposal that the Society should educate farmers' sons for them. It was not the Society's duty at all to relieve the parents of this obligation. To show how much chemists differed themselves, he referred to a paper on milk adulteration lately read before the Physical Society, of which he was president, by Mr. Falconer King, analyst for Edinburgh, in which the author endeavoured to show that another man, whose name was longer and better known, knew nothing about the subject. He did not say which of the two was right, but the fact was that thi; one was anything but complimentary to the other's professional worth. The science schools and colleges on the Continent and in America had been referred to as producing results far ahead of what could be found in Scotland. Well, it was only the other day that Mr. Saddler, an East-Lothian farmer, was asked to become a professor in one of those American colleges, and an East- Lothian farm-steward had just been offered a situation as practical manager of one of these institutions. He had been in most of the countries held up to them as examples in re- spect of scientific education, and he failed to see any such superiority in their agriculture as some recent writers and speakers would have them to believe. He was rather inclined to have a professor of agricultural chemistry in the L) niversity. Because, if they were to be such fools as to make their sons farmers — to keep them wasting their brains, time, and money making money for other people — the best thing to do was to give them a good general education, including everything that teachers and science could give them. Mr. SiiEKRiFF observed that Mr. Scot-Skirving, being a director of the Highland Society, naturally wished to keep down expenditure. He denied that they were not indebted to science and chemistry for the successful application of bones to the soil, and he hoped it would not go forth as the opinion of this Club that they were not. Mr. C. Smith said he did not entertain the idea that the Highland Society was going to educate farmers' sons for them. Mr. Scot-Skirving had misunderstood him ; he only meant that the Society should lend its influence and support as far as possible to the scientific teaching of the young. Mr. Harvey (Whittingham Mains) thought the Highland Society should take every available means to put down dealers in spurious manures — have them exposed. He did not care much about the appointment of a professor ot agricultural chemistry. Nor was he particularly in favour of a model farm. The Highland Society should advertise for a first-class chemist for themselves, and he thought this Club might send a deputation to the directors of the Highland Society on the subject. Mr. Robertson (New Mains) thought if they gave a man £1,000 he would have enough to do to spend it. Surely they could get a good chemist for at least half that sum. Field experiments should be conducted in different parts of the country, and these ought to be reported on periodically by a practical as well as scientific men. They had among the manure dealers very respectable men, but there were also those who sold spurious articles. He knew one gentleman who was offered from 20s. to SOs. per ton commission for selling ma- nures, the total price of which was only £6 a ton. He knew also an individual who was selling hundreds of tons of that very article in a county not far from Haddington. Mr. DURIE said it was desirable that this Club should come to something like a finding on the subject. He moved : " It is the opinion of this Club that the appointment of chemists in Edinburgh, Glasgow, Inverness, and Aberdeen will be the greatest chemical advantage to agriculture ; the principal chemist to be resident in Edinburgh, and small fees to be charged for analysis." Mr, Elder (Bearford) seconded. Provost Brodie (North Berwick) suggested that a chemist should be apppointed to inspect the manures, and he had no doubt the agents would be glad to pay the fees if the farmers would do their duty, and only purcliase from those who showed the result of such an analysis. Mr. Stevenson (Gullane) believed the liighlaud Society would confer a benefit on agriculturists by publishing cheap reprints of valuable works on agriculture. Mr. Adam Smith moved : " That the Highland and Agri- cultural Society should appoint a first-class man as chemist, who would devote his whole time to the interests of agricul- ture, and be paid a fixed salary for doing so, any fees charged for analyses to be paid into the fuuds of the Society, the duties of the chemist being to make an analysis of manures and feeding stuffs, &c., and, witli the assistance of an experienced practical man to conduct field experiments iu different parts of tlie country, thoroughly investigating and reporting on the same." Mr. Christie (West Mains) seconded the motion. After a good deal of discussion as to whether the discussion B 2 20 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. should be adjourned or not, a division took place, when 10 1 should have been adjourned. Mr. Smith motion was, how. voted for Mr. Smith's motion, and 4 for Mr. Durie's. Several I ever, declared carried. members declined to vote, on the ground that the debate | The Game-law Bills are to be discussed at the nest meeting. FRAMLINGHAM FARMERS' CLUB. OUR EXPENSES. At the last meeting the following lecture was delivered by the Kev. Henry Hill, of BuxhaU, Mr. E. S. Corrance in the chair. The Rev. Henry Hill said : At the time I was asked by your worthy President to read a paper at Framliugliam, some letters were appearing on the subject of taking a small farm ; hence my paper this evening, which I may say is not yet quite out of date. Perhaps the best advice to be given to sucli men — presumed to know nothing — would be that given by Mr. Punch to people about to marry — " Dou't." But it struck me then, and still does, that the expenses of land are too heavy in proportion to those of money, as represented in any other form. I assume that land represents money, and that mouey in any shape is capital. Tlie Government of a country is to be carried on by the taxation of tl'at capital, while interior administration — county, borough, or parochial — is indebted for fnnds to local taxation, or, what is easier to understand, by rates, as opposed to taxes. If I am properly understood, one of the great questions of the day is, whether we farmers, occupiers — ratepayers in some form or other — do not pay more than we ought in strict fairness to be called on to pay, as com- pared with the other capitalists of the country ? Mr. Read, I think, remarked that a farmer may get 8 per cent, for his money, the landlord may get 3 per cent., while the capitalist in trade or some profession gets 15 or 20 per cent. Not that I appeal ad misericordiam, but for justice, equity — simple fair- ness ; for, looking at it in a commercial point of view, there is HO reason to my mind why farming should be considered a worse investment than any other calling or profession. If you have the capital, and can depend on your own skill and judgment, you may do well, and need not ruin your neigh- bours. In fact, a farmer failing always reminds me of the gentleman in the "Ingoldsby Legends," who felt queer in the morning, after taking too much (Glad- stone's) claret over night, and said that "salmon always made him so." I think, as the advertisements say, " there is many an opening for a young man of talent, with a little capital, in a gentlemanly profession, without much risk." It is not the risk so much as the certainty that takes the gilt off the gingerbread. One recently published letter wanted five rents for the land divided thus : 1. Landlord and tithe. 2. Labour. 3. Rates, taxes, bills, and sundries. 4. Cake, manure, etc. 5. Time, profit, interest. I do not think I should put it in that form, but for comparison or argument it will do very well. And first for comparison : the great Mechi tells us that in 1873 — a very bad year — that for his farm of 170 acres, after paying all expenses, lie had very nearly £700 for rent, interest, and profit — that is for items one and five (because his time is of course well paid for in Leadenhall-street)— but that is, or ought to be, one of the best farms in England, and any of you gentlemen wiU be able to calculate its value from the figures I give, and on the supposition I mention as easily as the value of your own farm. Well, gentlemen, No. 1. Landlord and tithe you will and must allow. 2. Labour is a difiiculty that has increased since I wrote this paper, but will eventually settle itself. 3. Rates, taxes, etc., is a real diffi- culty. 4<. Cake, manure, etc., depends on the man. 5. Time, profit, and interest is to be calculated according to the bank rate. No. 1. Rent and tithe are necessary evils of the present day, though perhaps in the far distant future the latter may be given up as a sop to the independent landlords of the country, but rely on it some new imposition will be found, in the same way that the giant Euucation-rate is now taking the place of the pigmy Church-rate. Still it is to be remembered that the tenants — not the owners — fix the rent of the land. We cannot let if you will not hire. No. 2. Labour is a very serious item for consideration. As you well know, it varies with the locality and description of land, so much so that I doubt if it is to be taken as the same as another rent. But whatever its price, the amount employed is a sign of the pro- sperity of the concern. Mr. Walter, M.P., in The Times, Oct. 1, 1873, compared the body politic to the human body, and called, rightly, agriculture the trunk, and said that while it prospered, all the branches of trade, &e., would get on. But if one small wheel in an engine breaks the whole must stop — not for long — but all is out of gear for a time. So it is with labour. Every man has a right to ask his own price, but I need not buy the article. Still, for labourers or farmers to ask a third party what that price is to be, is opposed to political economy and common sense. I do not wish to be called in as an arbitrator, but I advise every man to do the best he can for himself, " and never mind the rest." The value of manual labour is variable, just as all engines are not of the same horse-posver. It always will be money that keeps the world's engines going. If a fair amount of money is offered to the labourer, artisan, or mecliauic, working for his daily bread, and refused, I doubt if after some few weeks in summer have used up the Union capital they will find the ratepayers willing to keep them in idleness, or even in work, for the short hours of winter. And yet it is said higher wages will reduce the poor-rate. Said, perhaps, by some one who pays neither the one or the other. The various devices for reducing farm labour is a subject of great importance ; but I doubt if our machinists at present have done much more than hold out great hopes for the future, and if manufacturers' prices must go up, why flesh and bone will still be the most economical servant we farmers can use, as it has been since " Adam delved and Eve span." In short an engine, especially on small occupations, always reminds me of the boy on a farm — it takes two men to look after him. Mr. Beach, at the Highclere Agricultural Association, remarked " that men would obtain iiigher wages, not by agitation, but by the legi- timate improvements in agriculture, the most important of these being the much larger introduction of machinery into operations" {^The Times, Oct. 1, 1873). That means, in my idea, the more machinery you have the more money you will spend in labour. But I hope no one will imagine I think the farming will be the worse. Some of our would-be instructors tell us one way to reduce the labour bill is to increase the permanent grasses. I am not going into the question of initial loss and ultimate gain in that case, but will merely remark that leave to plough up grass is no uncommon request out my way ; and I myself do not believe in leaving a clean fallow to grow thistles, etc., for the next tenant to keep his sheep on. One of our leading agriculturists, Mr. Read, M.P. for Norfolk, gives us very good advice, because he does it by example, and as a tenant-farmer, lie says, since the rise in wages he lias reduced his labour expenditure by ^100 a-year on a 400 acre farm. I can only say it looks as if he did not think much of his chance of getting compensation for those improvements, temporary, durable, and perma- nent, in which he and liis co-operative partner, Mr. Howard, take so much delight. Following my unknown friend's letter, suppose we take expenses No. 3, rates, taxes, &c. (bills and sundries being beneath our consideration). Again, I say, here lies the difficulty. As I have remarked, taxes and rates are to be divided into two divisions — imperial, applying to taxes ; and local, applying to rates. A man with £10,000 in the Funds pays income-tax on his actual income. A man with i'10,000 in land'pays on his rent, with no allowance for repairs, insurance, &c., in which the funds run no Fisk. It is Schedule A you pay under, whatever your capital consists of. Is the landlord to take a rack rent, and are the repairs to be done at the expense of the tenant, perhaps going out nest year ? Any ordinary mortal might imagine that a tax on land would be considered as an equivalent to a tax on money, but no such thing. Land pays right and left always, money once now and then, when wanted, as a War-tax say. And to prove the injustice of the Land-tax, any Government will allow you to redeem it at £8 to £9 below Consols, with an eye to the THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 21 future wlien all is redeemed. It was a happy tliouf;lit to i imagine the rent of a farm was all income, which could be taxed for the benefit of the manufacturing districts at the expense of us agiiculturists. To get Schedule A in the case of those individuals wlio pay no rent, 15 per cent, is added to the rateable, or about 4| to the gross value. In this way the Imperialists (the Londoners) show some sense, for they assume the local authorities are better judges than themselves in the Land Question. If you are too higlily assessed you must blame jour neiglibours at the Union Assessment Com- mittee, but you must pay scbedule A. Can it be said money, and land representing money, pay their fair share ot the expenses ? I do .not tliink I need say any more about Schedule]! A in a company supposed to be occupiers (strictly speaking), but 1 may add it is a curious anomaly tbat tliere should be so many different assessments as to the value of the same property for ditferenfc purposes. I can only suppose that as we are gradually drifting into decimal notation, we shall some day have a fixed set of figures for our assessment, and merely remove that " cussed" little dot according to the tax or rate that is being collected. Still, until the education of the country has become much more elementary than at pre- sent, we must carry on our dealings as we do our religion, in language " understauded of the people." Let us then remjve the dot (I need hardly say wliich way) to Schedule B. I suppose iu merciful consideration of his other burdens, the occupier is found worthy of a deduction of one-eighth of rent and tithe, and so he compounds for good and bad years, his landlord needing no consideration under SclieJule A. But in late years it has been found the landlords spend so much money on the farm houses, that occupiers are called on for House-tax, as of course every gentleman should be. There is one tax going to the Imperial Treasury, whicli I hardly like to mention to a meeting strictly non-political. I mean the Malt-tax. Tiie great difficulty in its abolition is not the jus- tice or injustice of its infliction on a class, but the enormous amount raised for the benefit of everybody else — not belonging to tl'.at class. And now I may pass froiu Imperial to Local Taxation ; as occupiers we all — landlord and tenant — feel the pressure. Schedule A takes a moiety even from the Great -tiastern Railway stock when you get a dividend. But do the Three Per Cents., railways, coal mines, ironstone, pay rates or local taxation like ordinary land. I have read somewhere, but cannot quote, that ironstone pays no rates. Then do we farmers pay more than we ought, in comparison ? First I take Poor-rates. The country is divided into districts, and so the amount in tlie £ will vary — I was going to say according tJ the prosperity, but it perhaps ought to be the population of the land. The vicinity of large towns may liave advantages to the farmer to make up for an increase in rates. But in many cases, the Poor-rate falls lieavy on the ratepayer, while the tax-payer proper is exempt altogether. To show the in- creasing magnitude of the Poor-rate, Professor L»vi found out by means of a calculating machine, or some boy educated under Government, that in 18(53 the Poor-rate was 8s. 4d. per head, and in 1873 16s. 3>\i., while Imperial taxation in 1863 was £2 8s. ■iJ.,and in 1870 £3 8s. 2d. le., in some ten years the ratepayer's expenses on one item doubled themselves wliile the taxpayer's were somewliat reduced. But I doulit if Professor Levi cauglit the full sura totnl — perhaps he left out decimals ! " W. ¥.," writing to T/te Times from Lincolnsliire, December 29, 1873, says they pay high wages (I leave out the price of labour on purpose), and employ the old men on the roads. I do not siy that no other county does the same. In this way a portion of the expense for maintaining the poor is charged on tlie Higluvay-rate, and the workhouse with its expensive organization is to a great extent useless. Surely it shows the Poor-rale does not include everything, or rather tiiat we rob Peter to pay Paul. It has been remarked that the Poor-rate is an inheritance devolving on the land, but surely when it was settled that" each rood should maintain its man," no bargain was made that the man should have a wife and family. Then why with our half-empty workhouses and large establishments do we keep large asylums with just as large establishments ? Why do we keep up half-empty prisousto be filled with military invalids and deserters, to be maintained at the same expense to the ratepayers, and for the benefit of the tax-payers of the country ? The question of lunatics is under consideration in another place, and we will leave it there. Well, then, we have a surveyor's rate, which I ought now-a- days to call the highway-rate. The ratepayers— principally farmers— pay ; and who use the roads ? Why, the capitalists of the country, who will soon be able to drive the Four-in-hand Club from John o'Groat's to the Land's Eud, and a return ticket, without paying a decimal fraction towards the expenses of maintenance. I sometimes fancy the Highway Boards are a sort of feeler for the School Boards : if you cannot manage either yourselves, botli can be carried out for you at your expense by Government officials. It is by no means a bad idea that the assessed taxes on locomotion should be employed to defray the maintenance of the highway roads, but then we know enough of Government officials looking after expendi- ture. It is paying a guinea to look after a pound, and yet a new Government relieves the rich at the expense of the poor by taking off the tax on horses. Surely a man that can buy a nag and keep a nig can pay tax for a nag. In Russia there are local provincial parliaments to control local taxation for roads and other purposes. We, as a country, are trying this system in a small way, with what result I leave you to guess vvho can and do read your county papers, and merely remind you of tiie proverb of the man who looks after his neighbours' business being able to take care of his own. But, gentlemen, I have not done yet, although I own the straws on our back get lighter as I proceed. There is the County-rate, not very serious perhaps, but so unsatisfactory that a new assessment in our case is talked of; so move the dot once more. In 1873 the assess- ment increased £1,637,354' on the last year, and I fancy the rate has increased in due proportion. One reason is the bridges have to be made strong enough for steam engines to pass over now-a-days. And the Police-rate. Do those ubiquitous gentlemen in blue simply look after the property of ratepayerf, or is their leisure time appropriated to the benefit of taxpayers? The average rate is a mere song, but is it right ? This ques- tionisalso under consideration iu another place. And then comes the militia. Why should we ratepayers keep up an almost permanent militia and the regular army be reduced to a minimum for the benefit of the taxpayer? Is tlie taxpayer to have the use of our best sinews of war for a few years, and then send them back on the ratepayers to support in uselessness for their decaying years ? And last perhaps at present, but by no means least, comes a rate I have already alluded to— the Education-rate— a fine healthy child that does not mean dying. I fancy our grandchildren will find the labourer just as anxious that the parson should write his name for him ?it his wedding as now-a-days, because he can liandle his scythe easier and oftener than a steel pen— his hand shakes so. I have said item No. 3 was the difficulty, it remains for you to say if you agree with me. I now ask a few minutes as to Nos. 4 and 5. No. 4, cake and manure. The man wlio spends a rent on this proves himself to be well off in this world's goods, and I sincerely hope he will reap his reward ; for if anyone deserve two blades of corn instead of one, such a man does. But I am rather inclined to think it is a case of that rare bird, the dodo. If that argument is not satisfactory, I hope some- one better up to it than I am will take "Cake, manures, and the etceteras," as the subject of some future paper. No. 5, Time, profit, interest. We farmers are all as greedy as a Co-operative Association. CKeap articles and large remuneration we want. A man farming 100 or 200 acres could as easily look after double ; therefore liis time's cost is to be counted as bailiff's wages. Piortt is to be counted by what you miglit get in another concern with the capital you have, or ought to have invested in your farm, and no bailiff is wanted. If you have to pay another rent for the capital, you and I know the profit will go with the interest— to the banker. Interest- as the great Duke said— small interest means good security. Let us hope a good valuation, with compensation for long-forgotten improvements, will make our books look better than we think of; and remember the capital once put into the farm is not lost by the cultivation of it. To sum up all this, gentlemen, both Box and Cox seem to think Local Taxation requires consideration ; and without even hinting at the "ways and means" for granting relief to the ratepayer, I hope something will be done shortly. It your discussion on the subject should lead to anything, I am content with having simply drawn your attention to it. Mr. Hill ako quoted the following figures from a Parliamentary return re- lating to the several counties of England, showing the valua- tion for the country and police assessments, the amount in the £ levied, the amount realised by Her Majesty's Treasury 22 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. subvention, the amount of loans effected on tlie security of the rates, and the loans outstanding at Michaelmas, 1872. The following are the figures relating to Suffolk and Norfolk : Valuation for County Asst „ for Police County Rate (in the £) .., Police Rate (in the £) .. Amount of County Rate,. „ Police Rate .. Treasury subv. for Police. . „ „ for Criminals Fines, fees, &c Total Receipts Total Expenditure Payments in Loans Outstanding Loans Suffolk. East D. West D. £907,360 £87S,91C IJd. Hd. ae6,62f> £5,4'JJ £3,078 £1,102 £1,065 £16,391 £17.16^ £3,49^ £521,441 Ifd. 2id. £3,802 £5,975 £1,621 £656 £933 £13,250 £13,110 £256 nil. Norfolk. £1,994,227 And the following resolution passed by the Lancaster Cham her of Agriculture : " Inasmuuh as the present operation o Local Taxation presses unfairly on the owners and occupiers of land and houses, it is the opinion of this Chamber that there should be such a revision as will ensure that every de- scription of property should contribute its fair proportion." The President, in opening the discussion, said it was his duty to invite discussion on that matter, of which they all knew a great deal practically, '< our expenses." It came under a great number of heads, whicii Mr. Hill had put so ably be- fore them. There were one or two points, aud prominently was the question of labour. That was a question that ttiey must touch upon witli extreme delicacy. It was a subject in the discussion of which every incautious word would be sure, he feared, to carry its own punishment. He was almost in- clined to think that as the question now stood, the less said about it the better ; nevertheless, it was their duty to put their opinions before the public. He felt that it was a manifest injustice to the farmer, who felt that his dealings witii his labourers had been fair, to be misrepresented, as th(»y had been in many cases, and they ought to speak out to remove the false impressions thus raised. He felt tliat all that was said upon the subject ought to possess some practica value, derived from experience, because there could not be harm in stating the truth properly, and in a temperate manner, and it would be found to be a matter not wholly devoid of interest. Mr. GooDWYN said the question introduced by Mr. Hill was certainly a most important one, for they found that their bur- dens were not lightened, but increased year by year. As they were all members of one body, he felt that each kind of pro- perty ought to bear its share of the burdens of Local Taxation. The question of the education rate was important to them, but he denied that in opposing this the farmers were actuated by a wish to keep the people in ignorance. He thought, how- ever, that if the working-classes were to be benefited by edu- cation, and if they were to be led on by others to believe that they could have what wages tliey pleased, it was only right that they should also be taught to put their hands into their own pockets aud educate their own children. He would rather leave the labour question, not because he had no opiuions on the subject, but because he would wish rather to throw oil on the troubled waters if he could. He would, however, confine himself to a denial of what had been said so often and so strongly— that the farmers were attacking the men. It should be known whenever tiie question was considered, that the first attack came from the other side. Mr. Paul Read denied that the Malt-tax was a burden upon the farmers. Did the farmers really think that if the ■Malt-tax were lepealed, they would be making such a price of their barley as at present ? He looked upon the Malt-tax as one paid by the public entirely to keep up the price of the farmers' barley. This was the effect of the tax, as it kept out the foreign barley. As to the reduction of their expenses, lie advised the farmers to farm their land so as to make it pro- duce more, and then the expenses would be lessened in pro- portion. Lord Derby had said that the land of England would produce double what it now did if farmed differently, and if they made it produce double, their expenses in rates and taxes would only remain the same as at present. Mr. Go;ii\ER would defy Mr. Read to explain how a man could grow as much upon 100 acres as he did now upon 200. Mr. W. Kejjt had heard the same quotation from the Earl of Derby's speeches, but he questioned whether such a state- ment had ever been made without some qualification. If the Earl of Derby did say that, he could not have meant acre for acre, but that the waste lands should be brought into cultiva- tion. Mr. Clutten said that there could be no doubt as to there being some mistake in this, as even the best cultivated allot- ments did not produce more than one or two coombs per acre above the pro'.uce of an average farmer. Mr. GoNNER said tiiat no system of husbandry could com- mand the season. Tiiey might produce straw, but the corn must come from a higher Power. Mr. Paul Read said that all that was talked about was corn, but they might also produce more meat and poultry. Mr. GoODWYN agreed with the remarks which had been made as to the use of artificial manures. He only regarded them as stimulants. As to the Malt-tax he was one of those who thought that the repeal of that tax would not be of benefit to the farmer. He thought they would not have the present price for their barley if it were not for the tax. Mr. Robert Garrard must protest against what had been said about the Malt-tax. He was a strong Malt-tax repealer, and he had no faith about the Malt-tax raising the price of barley. He thought that farmers had great interest in the repeal of that tax. As consumers, the repeal of that tax would be to them equal to a repeal of the Property-tax. As to the importation of foreign barley they must recollect that the Eastern Counties were peculiarly well situated for barley growing, and therefore they were interested in the repeal of the Malttax. He lioped it would not go forth to the country that the Framlingham Farmers' Club advocated the keeping on the Malt-tax. Mr. GooDWYN: It will go forth that we are not unani- mous. A Member : If barley was down to 30s. a coomb we should hear plenty about repealing the tax. Mr. Paterson said he did not agree with Mr. Garrard about the Malt-tax. He quoted Colonel Brise's letter on the labour question, and said that he agreed with the opinion there expressed as to making improvements in the Unions. The manufacturing interests had not been able to abolish the Unions, and there was great reason to doubt whether the far- mers could prevent them. He did not think tiiat the Unions had improved the condition of the labouring classes where they had been established. Mr. Conner said that the Union had caused more drunken- ness in that town than ever they had before. He did not entirely blame the men for forming the Unions, and believed that if the masters had looked properly alter the men in all cases, they would not have heard of the Union. He main- tained that the labouring classes had been better cared for in this country than in any other. He did not say they had been as well cared for as they ought to te, but was certain that they were better cared for by the classes above them than the lower classes of mechanics. The President, in closing the discussion, said, as a landlord he could not agree with Mr. Hill's advice not to take small farms, or with the division of the gross produce into five rentals. Tlie good old-fashioned calculation was four. He also questioned the statistics of Mr. Mechi which Mr. Hill had quoted. Coming to the labour question, he was pleased with the manner in which it iiad been touched upon. They as farmers did not approve of the Union. In the first place, what had been said as to its incompatibility with hired labour of that sort was right, but there were other reasons which some excellent gentlemen philanthropically inclined seemed to have overlooked. The principle of all Unions was an equality of wages — the worst man to be paid the same as the best, and the young the same as the old — a principle whicli he would never agree to. If they affirmed the principle of Unionism they affirmed that principle. It was useless to talk about rules which could be altered any day. This was the principle upon which all Unions had been based. Whether they should pro- ceed to such extremities as to lock-out was another question altogether ; but they should do all in their power to discourage what they believed to be a vicious social arrangement ; one which seemed to be entirely subversive of the present system under which England had been cultivated, and to be econo- THE FARMER'S MAGAZIHE. raically false and socially mischievous. The labouring classes hitherto had been socially dependent, and with the poor-rate and education rate they could never be called independent if the principles of Unionism were affirmed. Were he in the House of Commons he would immediately propose the aboli- tion of the Poor-laws, lie agreed in hoping for a speedy ter- mination of the dispute, but could not see how, without incurring many of the difficulties he had mentioned, it could be done by arbitration. It was a fact that the labourers were the aggres- sors, and he believed if they withdrew the attack, the farmers would be contented to take the men back on the old terras without any reference to the Union. He recommended per- sistent agitation as to Local Taxation, and, as to the Blalt-tax, remarked that in tiie face of a recent division it must be con- sidered to be in abeyance. Mr. IIiLL, in reply, said, in isfsrence to the education question, that he was afraid tlie labourer would not take the trouble to retain what he learnt. Upon the Malt-tax he had not expressed an opinion. As to the quantity of corn which could be grown, there was no doubt that the more money spent on a farm the more crops would be grown, but it must be done in judgment. He agreed with Mr. Goodwyn as to manure, and he might say that Mr. Corrv.nce's remarks on the labour question were most sensible. His advice about taking small farms was to those who did not understand farm- ing. A man who knew his business would get on best on a small farm. Though not responsible for Mr. Meclii's figures, he harJly agreed with the Chairman's way of putting them. THE FINANCIAL PROPOSALS. At a general meeting of the Wisbech Chamber of Agricul- ture, the principal business was to consider the financial pro- posals of the Government so far as they relate to agriculture, Mr. A. S. Ruston in the chair, Mr. W. C. Little said that when the Council met some weeks ago, before the Chancellor of the Exchequer had brought in his Budget, n was tiiought that tae Chamber would pro- bably be glad of an opportunity of expressing its opinion upon the proposals of the Government, whenever they were made They would observe that they were limited to tlie question so far as it regarded agriculture. They had nothing whatever to do with the general political question ; they had nothing to do with estimates, whether they were inadequate or other- wise ; but they had simply to accept the opinions of the Government and the Chancellor of the Exchequer as to the necessary amount to be speut and as to the means by which that amount was to be raised. Accepting those opinions, the question before them appeared to him to be this : What expectations had they formed before the Chancellor of the Exchequer announced his plan ? He should like at the be- ginning to say that tiie agricultural interest, in considering tiiis subject from their own point of view, had no desire to take a selfish or a class view ; they had no desire, nor the slightest hope, that they should be greatly relieved by taxa- tion, while other classes would have fresh taxation imposed upon them. The position of Chambers of Agriculture was this: lliey found that other classes of the community, by organization and by making a great deal of noise, had suc- ceeded in getting relieved of taxation, while the agricultural interest had by means of increased local rates and continually increasing burdens been unfairly taxed. There was one point upon which agriculturists were unanimous, viz., that some relief should be given to ratepayers, and that local taxation was one of the first qaestions that required to be considered by the Government, Another subject which was thought of im- portance by a considerable section of the agriculturists, al- though it was not thought of so much importance in this part of the country, was the Malt-tax. He believed the farmers of England were by no means unanimous upon that point; for althougli a considerable number of them looked upon it as a heavy tax upon the producer, there were about as many who thought it fell upon the consumer. Therefore, so far as this Chamber was concerned, there would not be any great disappointment felt that the Malt-tax had not been dealt with by the Government. In considering the proposals of the Government they might look upon them first of all so lar as they affected agriculturists in common with other classes. The remission of Id. on the in- come-tax would certainly alTect many classes besides themselves, but at the same time it would afi'ord them considerable relief. Wiien they remembered that farmers were assessed upon their full incomes, and that in no other business was it so ditficult to arrive at an exact statement of profits and losses, it was evident that the farmer paid his full share of imperial taxation to the income-tax, and therefore he would receive his full benefit from any remission of that tax. The horse duty was not quite so clear a benefit to the farmer, because farmers' horses employed in agriculture were exempt from the duty, but still the farmer would derive some benefit from it, because there were few of them who did hot keep a horse that paid the tax. Then the horsedealers' duty being taken off would remote some restrictions upon trade, and the farmers, as the breeders and rearers of horses, must derive some advantage from it. Besides, there were other reasons why they should accept these proposals of the Government. It was a question whether farmers who bought horses to graze for a short time and then sold them again were not liable to pay duty as horse- dealers, and in some cases tlie duty had been imposed upon them. They got rid of all liability upon that point, and they also got rid of a threat once thrown out by Mr. Lowe that he did not see why horses employed in agriculture should be exempt from duty. The concession made by the Government on local taxation was not a very large one, the amount to be given away being something less than Ij millions ; but they would observe that it recognised the principle they had main- tained ever since they had agitated the subject — that Govern- ment ought to contribute more largely than it has hitherto done towards those objects that are of national interest. With regard to the remission for the police, the Government had hitherto paid nominally one-fourth of the cost of the police, but practically it iiad been one-fifth. The total amount which the metropolis, which had an extra grant of one-third, would gain was £210,000 out of £500,000, the boroughs would gain £130,000, and the counties £150,000. But al- though tlie amount to be distributed among the counties was not v'ery lar^e, it would make a shght dilTerence to their rates He had obtained from the Treasurer of the Isle an account o the sums paid by the Government on account of the police, and it seemed that the average for the last four or five years had been slightly under £900 a year. They might assume that this amount would now be doubled, and that the county- rate would thereby be reduced ^d. in the pound per annum. With reference to lunatics, the Government pro- posed to contribute is. per head per week. The figures for the Wisbech Union gave an average for the last three years of 41 lunatics, who were maintained at a charge to the county of £1,163 a year. The Government allowance of 4s. a week would amount to about £418, or nearly |d. in the pound, so that by these two Government contributions their rates would be reduced very nearly Id. in the pound. That was not a very large remission, but, as he had said before, it accepted the principle they had for years contended for. AVhile on the subject of lunatics he should like to point out that the aver- age cost of maintenance throughout the country was 10s. a week. The Wisbech Union sent lunatic to two asylums — the one in Norfolk, where the average cost of maintenance was 9s. 6d., and the other at Cambridge, where the cost was lis. Id. He should like to draw the attention of the visitors of the Cambridgeshire Asylum to the fact, which was wortliy of their attention, that the cost of maintenance in their asylum was Is. Id. a week more than the average throughout the kingdom, and Is. 7d. more than that of the asylum at Thorpe, in Norfolk. But the remissions of taxation to which he had referred were not all that the Government proposed to do. They were the only definite proposals that had as yet beea made, but every one who had read the report of the speech of the Chancellor of the Exchequer must have seen there was a desire on the part of the Government to examine into the question of local taxation, with the object of atfording them substantial relief. There were some great sources of expen- 24 I^HB FARMER'S MAGAZINE!. diture not dealt with at all, as, for instance, the administration of justice. That was a question of imperial interest, and one upon which no additional contribution was made. The Chancellor of the Exchequer stated in his speech that the subject was receiving the attention of a lloyal Commission, and that he did not feel it would be ri^ht at present to make any proposal respecting it. Then there was the question of highways, upon which they thought they were entitled to ask for some relief, but it had not been dealt with by the Govern- ment at present. Therefore, taking the proposals of the Government as a desire on their part to afford them some re- lief— coupled with the expressions of sympathy tliat had fallen from the Prime Minister and the Chancellor of the Exchequer — he thought they might fairly congratulate themselves upon their present position. They had no right to accept those propositions as final, and they would scarcely be satisfied witli them if they were to be considered as such. There were many ways in wiiich the Government might give them greater assistance, but taking all the circumstances into consideration — that they had been in office only a few weeks, and had had no time to mature a plan — he thought that they would be doing wrong if they were to express their disapproval of their proposals. He would conclude therefore by moving the fol- lowing resolution : " Tliat this Chamber accepts provisionally the financial proposals of tlie Government, as admitting the principle that ratepayers are entitled to some relief on account of charges imposed upon them for objects of national interest, and trusts that so soon as the Government shall have com- pleted that inquiry into the subject of Local Taxation, which they have promised.'they will considerably extend the principle which they have thus admitted." Mr. W. L. Ollaud, in seconding the motion, said he should confine himself to the remission of the horse duty ; and he perfectly agreed witli Mr. Little that it was almost impossible for farmers to buy horses and graze them, and then sell them again, without making themselves liable to pay duty. He had a case in point ; and an expression of opinion was given by magistrates that many persons who had no intention of becoming horsedealers in the ordinary sense of the word, ran the risk of having the penalty imposed upon them while carry- ing on their ordinary business pursuits. Then again cases frequently arose where persons might be made liable to the duty simply for rendering an act of kindness to their neigh- bours. He was glad these anomalies had been done away with by the remission of the duty, and throughout the country he thought there was but one opinion, that, considering the,cir- curastances, the Budget was a very fair one to all classes, *and that the Chancellor of the Exchequer had raised himself in public estimation by the manner in which he had dealt with the subject. Mr. H. J. LiTTL'E agreed with liis brother that if the pro- posals of the Government were to be considered as final, they would have a grievance against the Government, but he believed they were fully resolved to take the whole question of local taxation into consideration, and that the ratepayers might speedily look for a revision of the system. With regard to the Malt-tax, no doubt in many Chambers of Agriculture the Chancellor of the Exchequer would be severely censured for not taking something off it. He himself thought, when there was a surplus of five millions, that it would now become a question of dealing with the Mait-tax, but on reflection he appeared before them in the interesting character of a pervert, for after the experience of the last year or two he did not think the farmers had any grievance with regard to the Malt-tax. So long as he was a grower of barley, he considered it more aa a grievance upon the agricultural labourer than upon the grower, for he felt that the labourer was entitled to have the beverage of his country at as cheap a rate and as wholesome as he could possibly get it ; but the whole tendency of legislation had lately been to take off taxation from the necessaries of life, so that tea, sugar, coffee, and such-like necessaries had been enormously reduced in price. It now rested almost with the labouring man to say how much he was willing to give towards the taxation of his country. He was scarcely taxed for any- thing except for the beer which he drank ; and if he chose not to tax himself in that respect he might go scot-free, but if on the other hand he chose to indulge to a considerable extent, as unfortunately too many of them did, he would con- tribute considerably to the revenue of his country. As one who had seen reason to alter his views with regard to this question, he thought he would give the reasons wliy lie felt they ought no longer to look to the Chancellor of the Es« chequer for sny alteration in the Malt-tax ; especially as any alteration in the tax must lead to a great revision in the spirit duties, and they all knew that in the large towns any great deciease in the price of spirits would lead to greater habits of drunkenness among the lower classes. Mr. H. Sharpe thought they might well afford to be indif- ferent with reference to the Malt tax, when the growers and the great consumers regarded it with so much apathy. He felt satisfied both parties in the House of Commons were pre- pared to go fully into the question of local taxation, and he hoped when another session had passed they would get all they wished. Mr. Brown remarked that the subject was too one-sided ; they could not get up any opposition, aud without opposition there could be uo discussion. He acknowledged he had always been a Malt-tax repealer, and he thought it would only have been fair if with such a large surplus some remission had been made to the beer drinker as well as to the tea and sugar drinkers. A good deal had been taken off the free breakfast table, but no notice had been taken of the hard- working man who required his glass of beer. It had been said that the tax upon beer was almost the only one paid by the poor man, but it must be remembered that he very much enjoyed his pipe of tobacco, and no article of consumption was more heavily taxed or raised a greater amount of money than that. He did not know, however, that he should advocate much reduction of the duty on tobacco, for sometimes when he saw in the large towns boys under twelve years of age with cigars in their mouths before dinner, he thought tobacco was cheap enough. Tlie Chairman quite concurred with the remarks made by Mr. Little in introducing the subject, and he had come to the same conclusion as he had done. He felt that the Govern- ment, having had so little opportunity of maturing their scheme, could not go thoroughly into the question of local taxation, but as they had so clearly intimated their intention of giving the subject due consideration during the coming year, he thought they were free to suppose it would be dealt with in a comprehensive manner. As to the small relief that had been offered to the ratepayers, he thought they might take it as an admission of the principle ; and if it was to become a question of the Malt-tax z)ffr*«* Local Taxation, he felt it would be to the interest of the towns as well as to the owners and occupiers that the reduction should be made in the shape of local taxation rather than the Malt-tax. Any remission of the Malt-tax must necessarily bring about a re- vision of the spirit duties, and it was a question whether that would not involve too large a sum of money to be thrown away in one direction. His own idea was that they should ask the Government to afford reasonable and just help to the ratepayers, which would be of much greater interest to the country at large, and therefore he was quite disposed to adopt the resolution as it stood before the meeting. The motion was then put, and carried unanimously. The Chairman then called upon Mr. G. F. Moore, secre- tary to the Chamber, to introduce the next subject : " The report of the Select Committee of the House of Commons on Locomotives on Iloads." Mr. Moore said his notes consisted chiefly on extracts from the report of the select committee, but his object was to show that the present law is anomalous and unsatisfactory and re- quires alteration. Some idea of the large amount of capital invested in this kind of machinery might be gathered from the statements made by two witnesses before the committee, that their firms alone had supplied about 1,500 self-moving en- gines for use in this country, of the total value of £700,000 ; besides which there were many other engineering firms who were large makers of them, and there was little doubt that if greater freedom were given to their use, before long the ma- jority of thrashing and other heavy machinery would be moved from place to place by steam, especially as many of the existing portable engines could be converted at a little cost into self-movers ; besides which the increasing cost of horses of their maintenance showed the national importance of the substitution of steam for horse-power wherever practicable. With reference to the danger to which horses and carriages would be liable from the use of locomotives on roads, Mr. Moore read extracts from the report of the committee showing that considerable difference of opinion existed among the wit- nesses upon this point, but they were almost unanimous iu "THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. S5 eaying that the inconvenience soon disappears, althougli there were, and probably always would be some few horses whicli would take fright at an engine, as at many other objects. We know (he continued) there are some few places in the coun- try where, even in tiiis year of grace 187i, the inhabitants play long whist, and iiave to go ten miles to a railway station, but the spot where locomotives have not been introduced at all must be the veritable Ultima Thule, and no legislation is likely to reach it. With regard to tlie damage done to the roads, evidence was taken be. ore the committee showing that on ordinary well-made roads little or no damage is caused by the engine ; and, on the contrary, it was stated that beuelit results to the road from tlie consolidation produced by the pressure of the engine, and one witness informed the com- mittee that he had successfully used the broad wheels of iiis engine as a roller in constructing a new road. Ou roads which are only slightly metalled, or which rest upon a bad or an insufficient foundation, as is the case in some of the occu- pation roads in this neighbourhood, there is no doubt damage would be done by the frequent passage over them of heavy locomotives ; but the same result would be obtained by tlie use of horse-power. As to the bridges, the anomalous state of the present law was pointed out by the evidence given be- fore the committee by Mr. Aveling, to the effect tliat, " If I send a boiler, weighing 15 tons, over the county bridge, drawn by 15 horses, and that boiler breaks through the bridge, I have uothin^ to pay ; but if I send the sume boiler over a bridge with au engine weighing eight tons, and the boiler breaks through tlie bridge, I have the whole expenses to pay." Almost all tlie witnesses examined before the committee ad- mitted that agricultural engines have become a necessity in many localities, and in this immediate neighbourhood he (Mr. Bloore) believed tliere were more self-moving engines tiiau there are private carriages drawn by a pair of horses. Wliy then should not they be considered the ordinary traffic of the district ? The recommendations of the conimiltee as to roads and bridges were to the following efi'ect : 1. jSo owner shall be liable for damage done to any bridge provided his engines does not exceed 20 tons weight, and pro- vided no notice be affixed to the bridge. 2. If notice be affixed the owner shall be liable if the weight of his engine exceeds that named in tlie notice. 3. If the engine exceeds 20 tons, the owner shall be liable whether notice be affixed or not. 4. Any person taking an engine of more than 20 tons weight over any public road shall be liable to all damage caused to such road in consequence. The Committee also recommend that except on narrow roads, the local authorities shall have no power to prohibit the passage of locomotives at any hour. Having read the recom- mendations as to speed, Mr. Moore concluded by moving the following resolution : " That it is desirable for the advance- ment and assistance of agriculture that the use of locomotives should be encouraged to the fullest possible extent, having due regard to the public safety and interests, llesolved, therefore, that this Chamber approves the Report of the Select Commit- tee of the House of Commons on Locomotives on Roads, and the recommendations therein contained." The Chairman suggested that as the Chamber had not as yet had the opportunity of reading the report of tlie Select Committee the latter part of the resolution should be omitted, as it would be unwise for them to approve a report of which they had only heard a few passages read. Mr. Moore concurred with the suggestion ; and Mr. Sharpe then seconded the resolution, remarking that he was afraid they were a little behind-hand in not having examined the report of the Select Committee. He pointed out the awkward position agriculturists were placed in, by certain districts being intersected with drains without the promoters being compelled to build the bridges of sufficient strength to bear the passage over them of steam locomotives, which were becoming indispensable to agriculture. Mr. Brown readily assented to the resolution, but he said there was no part of England where the subject ought to be approached with more care and consideration than in the Isle of Ely. The roads were intersected in every direction with rivers and ditches, the bridges over which were originally constructed to carry the ordinary traffic of the country, and he pointed out that if all these bridges were to be strengthened so as to allow the passage over them of locomotives weighing 20 tons, the county rate would be very considerably increased. He did not wish to throw any obstacle in the way of advance- ment of agriculture, but he thought the interests of steam cultivation would be better served by the adoption of a lighter implement, which would be more suitable for private individuals, especially in the fen districts, than the large engines used by cultivating companies. He agreed with the first part of the resolution ; but looking to the novelty of the subject he thought they ought to approach it with discretion, and he was not prepared to vote for the second portion. Mr. W. L. Ollakd agreed wiih Mr. Sharpe that it was against all reason that any company sliould be allowed to intersect the country with drains and to build bridges over them so light that persons engaged in agriculture could not get their implements over them. He apprehended that every year would witness an increase in the use of steam agricultural implements, and unless they could be freely moved from one part of the country to another, the result would be that ceriaiu farmers would be prevented, from their isolated position, from using machines which their neighbours could use with profit and advantage ; or else that every litte area must have an engine of its own, which could not possibly travel beyond the limits of its own district. The subject resolved itself into the question whether or not steam implements are a necessity in agriculture ; and if they are so the bridges must be so con- structed that they can pass freely from place to place. Mr. Desborougii also made some remarks on the subject, from which he wandered on to the question of sewerage and docks, and concluded, amidst some amuseinent, with the sound observations that "tliose who want sewerage ought to pay for it, and those who want docks ought to pay for them." The CiiAiRMAN said the great difficulty in the matter was unquestionably the bridges. Everything should be done to encourage scientific agriculture, especially in a district like this, which depends so much upon agriculture ; and if these locomotives v\ere necessary for the successful cultivation of the laud, every facility ought to be afforded for using them. At the same time there was a question as to what was the proper weight of the engines. He did not think it necessary to have them weighing 20 tons, but he thought engines from 10 to 14 tons would be quite sufficient for cultivating all lands requiring cultivation, especially in the Fen districts. In that case, the expense of strengthening the bridges would he much less, and he thought they would be of opinion that it was desirable to strengthen the bridges to that extent, and thus place every district in the Fens in a position to successfully cultivate its land. Mr, Moore, in reply, said it was necessary that the engines be from 10 to 12 or 1 i tons weight, but 20 tons was put down as the maximum, aud the owner of any engine above that weight would be liable for any injury that it might cause. The resolution was then put to the meeting and carried. A POTATO CASE.— In the Court of Queen's Bench, the case of Haveli v. Coupland, involved a curious point, arising out of the potato disease. The defendant, a Lincolnshire farmer, had entered into a contract with the plaintiff in March to sell him " 200 tons of potatoes, grown on his land at Whaplode," at the price of £3 6s. 8d. per ton, to be delivered in September. There were 68 acres of the defendant's land in course of cultivation, and 250 acres were actually planted at Whaplode, and it appeared that they would produce seven tons an acre, so that there was abundant land sown to raise the quantity contracted for. In August, how- ever, the potato disease attacked the crop and destroyed it, so that the farmer was unable to complete his contract. The question was whether he was excused in law. Mr. Seymour^ Q.C., aud Mr. Waddy, Q.C., were for the plaintiff; Mr. F'ield,' t^.C, aud Mr. lieasley were for the defendant. After a long- argument, which took up the best part of the day, the Court gave judgment in favour of the defendant, the farmer. Mr. Justice Blackburn said the effect of the contract was that the potatoes should be delivered out of the crop of the defendant's farm, so that it was to be the produce of particular land, and in that respect it resembled a contract for a certain quantity out of a particular cargo. So far, therefore, it was a contract for specific goods, and there was an excuse in law if they perished in the mean time, as in the present case, without any default on the part of the farmer. Mr. Justice Quain also said tlie potatoes to be delivered were to be potatoes grown upon 26 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. the particular farm, and no others could have been supplied ; so that when that became impossible in consequence of the potato disease the performance of the contract became impos- sible. Mr. Justice Archibald also concurred on similar grounds, observing that there was no default on the part of the farmer. THE DISEASES OF STOCK IN 1873. [From the Kepout of the Veterinary Department of the Privy Council.] The Lords of the Council have not, during the year 1873, beeu required to exercise, by means of Orders of Council, the powers conferred upon thera by Tlie Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act, 1869, on many occasions ; only seven Orders have beeu passed during the year. It lias been considered advisable to give a reprint of tliese Orders in the Appendix. In considering these Orders it will be necessary to refer to the labours of the Select Committee of the House of Commons appointed to inquire into tlie operations of tbe Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act, 1SG9, the Cattle Diseases Acts (Ire- land), and the Constitution of ilie Veterinary Departments in Great Britain and Ireland, as oue of these Orders is based upon their recommendations. Tliis Committee met for the first time on Thursday, the Gtb of March, 1873, and continued its sittings until Friday the 25th of July, at which meeting the report, a copy of which will be found in the Appendix, was agreed to. The Lords of the Council, after having care- fully considered such of tbe recommeudatious of the Com- mittee as did not require fresh legislation, issued the Order o( the 2nd of August, 1873 (No. 366), which makes the slaughter of cattle affected with pleuro-pneumonia compulsory, removes foot-and-mouth disease from tlie contagions aad infectious diseases as regards the Orders of Council under the Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act, 1869, and relaxes tlie restriction contained in section 57 relating to foot- and-mouth disease. Bisides this Order, their Lordships issued two Orders relating to foreign countries ; the first, dated the 7th of January, 1873 (No. 363), relieved sheep brought from Germany to this country from the Order of the 31st of July, 1872, requiring their slaughter ; the other, dated the 11th of June, 1873 (No. 36i), relieved, under cer- tain conditions, the cattle brought to tiiis country from Schleswig and Holstein from the provisions of the fourth schedule of the Act. Tlie effects- of the relaxation of these restrictions upon our imports is not apparent. As regards German sheep there is a decrease in 1873 of upwards of 78,000 upon the import of 1872, although the restriction re- quiring the slaughter of these sheep was removed in January 1873, and although tlie total imports of foreign sheep increased in 1873 by nearly 39,000. And with regard to cattle from Schleswig and Ilolstein, the return show that in 1872, when more than five-sixths of these cattle were landed at Deptford, 38,730 cattle were received from tliese states ; while in 1873, when none of tiiem were landed at Deptford for slaughter, all being permitted to go to the Metropolitan Cattle Market, we only received 38,100, although the total import from Ger- many increased in that year. Of the other four Orders, one, dated the 30th June, 1873 (No. 365), declares " farcy" to be a contagious disease within the meaning of the Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act, 1869, and provides for the making by local authorities of regulations as to glanders and farcy ; another, dated the 25th of September, 1873 (No. 367), relates to an alteration in the limits of the part of the port ot South- ampton defined for the quarantine ot foreign animals not in- tended for slaughter ; and two, dated the 13tli of November, 1873 (No. 368 and No. 369), revoke previous Orders ot Council which allowed cattle from scheduled countries to be landed at Liverpool and Shoreham. With regard to the Order relating to farcy and glanders, very little effect can, as yet, have been produced. Only seven local authorities have applied for power for making regulations as to glanders, and we have only been informed of regulations having been made by six of these ; there being 401 local authorities in Great Britain. The Order of Council requiring the compulsory slaughter of cattle alfected with pleuro-pneumonia only came into operation on the 1st of September, and does not, as yet, appear to have had much effect in checking this disease. Tlie prevalence of pleuro- pneumonia is probably due to several causes — First. To neglect of owners in giving notice of the disease. Nor is it likely that this notice will be given generally uatil the compensation is iocreased to such an extent as to make it the owner's interest to do so. SeconiUi/. To delay in tlie slaughter of the diseased cattle. Thirdlij. To the want of efficient separation of cattle in the incipient stages of the disease before they are capable of giving it to others, from those which are not so diseased. The latest information from the Netherlands confirms this opinion, as the bend of the veterinary administraiion of that country, Dr. Van Cappelle, states his experience to be that strict isola- tion is absolutely necessary, and he attributes the success with which the disease has been encountered in the Netherlands more to the isolation of suspected animals for three mouths, than to the slaughter of the affected animals only. Legislation suggested in this Country. — Many important suggestions as to future legisklion on the sub- ject of the contagious and infectious diseases of animals were brought before the Select Committee of the Houi-e of Com- mons, aad the result of their consideration of these sugges- tions is embodied in their Report. The action pursued by the I'rivy Council with regard to the importation of foreign animals was approved by that Committee, who did not suggest any change of legislation as regards this branch of the subjects uider their consideration. With regard to the contagious and infectious diseases ot animals, the suggestions of the Com- mittee are arranged under the various diseases beginning with cattle plague. In this disease they recommended the power of slaughter contained in the Act to be extended; and there does not appear to be a doubt, if the experience of other countries is to be relied upon, tliat the extension recommended would greatly tend to check the spreading of this disease. They also recommended a higher rate of compensation generally. The Committee's recommendations on the subject of the necessity for isolation in pleuro-pneumonia do not differ materially from the regulations which are at present in force in the Nether- lauds. The time of isolation is, however, different ; being two months in the case of the recommendations of the Select Committee, and three months in the Netherlands regulations. There does not appear to be a doubt that the longer the isola- tion is kept up, the greater will be the security ; but there is no evidence to prove that even three months would give abso- lute security. The Committee recommended slaughter of animals suffering from this disease and compensation, and the Privy Council gave effect to this recommendation in their Order of tlie 2nd of August, 1873. Tlie Committee also recommended that whatever compensation is paid should bear a certain pro- portion to the owner's loss rather than, as at present enacted, to the value of the animal, but as the Lords of the Council did not consider tliat they would be justified, without fresh legisla- tion, in changing the principle upon which Parliament had based compensation, the payment was provided for in this Order in the same manner as is ordered by the Act as regards cattle plague. In the Order of the 2nd of August, 1873, the compensation in pleuro-pneuinonia is therefore at present limited to the same amount as that ordered by the Act as re- gards cattle plague, and thus the owner, in the greater number ot cases, does not realise through the local authority so much for the cattle as he might himself make for thera. The result is, that in a great number of cases no notice is given of the existence of this disease. Nor is it likely that notices will be generally given until the amount of compensation renders the giving of the required notices a gain to the owner, instead of a loss. It would appear to be open to discussion whether a compensa- tion of three-fourths of the loss sustained by the owner, as recommended generally by the Committee, would be a sullicient iuducement to all owners of cattle sulferiug from pleuro- pneumonia to give notice of its existence. The length of time recommended by the Select Committee for the isolation of cattle which have been herded with animals affected with tiiis disease has already been referred to ; but the movement of THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 27 these cattle, recoraraended under the head of pleuro-pueu- raonia, paragraph {b), will require extreme care in drafting the regulations for isolation, or it will tend to the spreading of tlie disease. The recommendation of the chief inspector of this department is that those cattle which show an internal tem- perature of above 103 degrees Fahrenheit should be dealt with as infected animals, and should be kept separate from those which do not show such increase of temperature. The power proposed to be given to the inspector by paragraph (c) of the recommendations of the Committee would meet a difficulty which has long been felt, of not being able to apply the neces- sary restrictions in cases where the disease has not been de- tected until after death. Compulsory slaughter and compen- sation in sheep-pox were recommended by the Committee, and would doubtless help in stamping out this disease if it again appears in this country. The compulsory slaughter of horses affected with y/awfte-* and compensation to the value of the carcases of the animals slaughtered, were also recommended by the Select Committee. This will require great ci ution in its application so long as the inspectors as a body are not qualified for the detection of the disease. It appears also to be the present practice throughout Great Britain to slaughter in this disease. 965 cases were reported during the years 1871, 1872, and 1873, and of these 896 were slaughtered, 4.8 died, and 20 are said to have recovered. The la'^ter statement is, however, questioned by the inspectors of the department, and it is quite possible that errors in the returns may have been made, either in the disease or in the recovery, as of the 1,678 inspectors of local authorities in Great Britain during 1873, about 22 per cent, only were veterinary surgeons, and about 59 per cent, were members of the police force ; whilst the other 19 per cent, consisted of persons who were neither veterinary surgeons nor policemen, nor does it appear that they were possessed of any special qualification for the duties entrusted to them. The Select Committee examined a large number of witnesses, to whose opinions, as regards foot-and-mouth disease, great weight must necessarily be attached ; the result of which was that recommendations were agreed to which almost wholly interdict any interference for the purpose of checking it. The experience of other countries appears also to support these conclusions ; but, so far as regards the information in the possession of this department, it remains yet to be proved that restrictions of a severe character would be ineffectual, as it does not appear that such restrictions have, as yet, ever been really carried into effect. The report also recommended the inspec- tion of vessels engaged in the Irish and coasting, as well as in the foreign trades, and also of railways, lairs, markets, and fairs, and the employment of travelling inspectors for this pur- pose. Importation OF Animals. — The total number of live animals imported into Great Britain during the year 1873 exceeded that of 1872 by upwards of 200,000, there being an increase of more that 95,000 in the cattle, nearly 126,000 in the sheep, and a falling off of upwards of 15,000 in the swine. The latter may perhaps be accounted for by the increae in our im- ports of bacon and pork. Foreiyfi: Our imports of foreign animals during the past year show an increase upon 1872 in each class of animal ; during the latter year we received 174',760 cattle, 810,551 sheep, and IGiOSl swine, widlst in 1873 we imported 201,531 cattle, 849,286 sheep, and 80,042 swine. On referring to the table showing the foreign countries from which we have obtained our imports of animals for the last five years, it will be seen that great changes have taken place. Belgium and France, which together furnished us in 1869 with nearly 16 per cent, of our total supply of foreign cattle, in 1873 sent us little more than ^ per cent, of such supply. On the other hand, Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, which in 1869 sent us less than 4 per cent, of our total foreign supply, in 1873 has supplied us with more than 21 per cent, of all our foreign cattle. And with regard to our imports of sheep, similar changes have taken place, although not of so marked a character. For instance, taking Denmark, Norway, and Sweden together, there appears to have been a steady increase in our imporis of sheep during this period ; these three coun- tries sent us only 4,303 of these animals in 1869, whilst we received 27,455 from them in 1873. That France and Bel- gium should heve sent us less cattle in 1870 and 1871 may have arisen from the restrictive Orders then in force on account of the cattle plague, but it is difficult to explain why such a sudden increase of our import of sheep from France should have taken place in 1872, accompanied by a decrease in the import from Beligum, whilst in 1873 the increase occurs in slieep from Belgium, and the decrease in sheep from France. Variations of a similar nature may be observed in our im- ports of swine, although but little importance can be attached to this trade, as our total import is comparatively insignifi- cant. Changes have also taken place in the amount of im- portation into the various ports. Thus, in 1869 nearly 71 per cent, of our foreign cattle were landed in the port of Lon- don ; in 1873 only about hQ\ per cent, were landed at that port. These changes in the course of trade might formerly have been accounted for by the difference of practice on the part of the various inspectors as to the examination of the foreign animals and the necessity for their detention, but of late years the examination has been uniform, and there does not appear to be any reason other than that of trading ad- vantages to cause the transfer of the trade from Loudon to the other ports. Aniraals brought from tlie Channel Islands are, under section 6 of the Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act, 1869, foreign aniraals, but are not so considered by the Customs. In tiie Appendix will be found tables showing the amount ol our imports from these islands during the last two years. Similar inlbrmation has not hitherto been published in the annual reports. Irish : From Ireland the imports into Great Britain have increased during the past year by upwards of 68,000 cattle and 86,000 sheep, but the import of disease has decreased by upwards of 79,000. The latter may have been counteracted by a larger import of pork and bacon, but on this point no information can be obtained from the Customs, as tliey have ceased to keep any separate record of these imports froia Ire- land. CONTAGEOUS DISEASES AMONGST AnIMALS. — Home: No cattle plaguejor sheep-pox has occurred amongst our home stock during the past year. Altliough the number of cases of pleuro-pneumonia reported during the year 1873 is nearly 15 per cent, less than in 1872, it is difficult to show that this is due to any of the preventive measures taken. Compulsory slaughter has been too short a time in operation to show its elfects, and both slaughter and isolation have been so ineffec- tually carried out generally that no inference can be deduced as to its success or non-success in checking the spreading f this disease. On comparing, iiowever, the returns for the last four months of 1873 with the same period of 1872, it will be found that although tiiere is an increase during that period of last year in the number of outbreaks and iu the number of cattle on the infected premises, yet the number attacked is less, being in 1870 nearly 17 per cent., and in 1873 a little over 12 per cent. In the last four months of 1872, only 49 per cent, of those attacked were killed ; in 1873, 94 percent, were killed. The average number of cattle attacked in the above-mentioned periods during each outbreak in 1872 was 3.313; in 1873 it was 2.369. Two local authorities, however, have reported that they have carried out the Orders, and that they have succeeded in checking the disease iu the one case, and in stamping it out in the other ; but the former state that they do not consider the result adequate to the outlay incurred. This outlay is in many cases very large from tlie fact that the carcases of cattle slaughtered even in the early stages of the disease have been by some local aiitliorities ordered to be de- stroyed as unfit for human food without examination. The Lords of the Council have been advised that the owner of any animal slaughtered on account of being affected with this disease has an absolute right to the carcase, and to dispose thereof, subject to the ordinary law, and with regard to the provisions of the second section of the Nuisances Removal Act for England (Amendment) Act, 1863 (26 & 27 Vict. cap. 117), it would appear that the medical officer or inspector of nuisances acting under the above-mentioned section is only authorised tiiereby to inspect and examine, and to form his opinion on the appearance presenting itself to him on that in- spection and examination, and is not justified iu basing his opinion to any extent on the liistory of the object inspected, and his own view of the facts of that history. Tliere is no conclusive evidence that any injurious results have followed from the consumption of these carcases, and it is known tliat very large niarabers of them are sold for food. The official information with regard to foot-and-moiith disease is very small, but there does not appear to be a doubt that it has been less pre- valent during the past year than it was in 1873. There is no 28 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. reason lioweVer, to believe tliat the immunity from this disease will coutiuue. A report on this subject by the chief inspector of the Department will be found in the Appendix. Sheep- scab is evidently on the decrease if reliance is to be placed upon the returns furnished to this Department. la 1872, the number of attacks was 60,35-i ; in 1873, the number was only 41,104. But tills does not represent the real decrease in those districts where it was most prevalent. Taking seven counties, in each of which more than 2,000 cases of this disease occurred in 1871, it will be fouud that tlie total number of cases in them for 1871, 1872, and 1873 are respectively, 3i,702, 28,200, and 15,014, showing a decrease during the three years of more than 50 per cent. Nor does this show the full eflect that may be anticipated from our legislation, as in tlie greater number of these districts the provisions contained in the Order in Council were only partially carried out. Thus, in the case of one county in wliich, according to information received, the permissive Order was carried out fully from August, 1871, the number of cases decreased from 2,951 in that year to 1,51)0 in 1872, and to 378 in 1873. It would therefore appear that the legislation as regards this disease, if effectually carried out, would be attended with a very beneficial result. The returns of cases of glanders in Great Britain during the last three years show a gradual increase from iOi in 1871 to 325 in 1872, and 436 in 1873. It is impossible to decide whether this in- crease is real or apparent ; whether it is due to increased vigi- lance on the part of the inspectors, conscientiousness on the part of the owners, or a real increase of the disease. There is reason to believe that even now only a small percentage of the cases which occur are returned. Farcy has only been included under the meaning of contagious or infectious disease since the 2nd of July, 1873, and the number of cases reported is so small as not to require any Inrther notice. Foreign : Cattle-plague has existed during the year 1873 in between 90 and 100 dilferent places in Austro-Huugary ; in Germany, in the States ol Bavaria and Silesia ; in Greece, in the Islands of Corfu, Andros, Naxos, Jos, and Tinos ; in Russia and Poland ; in Turkey in Europe and Turkey in Asia ; in Egypt ; in China, and in Japan. A reference to the ap- pendix with 8how the names of the different places in these countries in which the disease existed. The importation of cattle from Russia being proliibited, and there being little probability of any importaliou from Greece, Turkey, Egypt, China, or Japan, the fact of the existence of this disease in Austro-Hungary, and in Germany during the past year appears to be the only one which requires particular attention. The risk of the intro- duction of cattle plague from Austro-Hungary direct is very small, as we receive no imports from the Austrian ports, and our risk of getting it indirectly is very much reduced since the adjoining countries have become alive to the necessity of immediate action. From Germany there is greater danger, but this will be reduced to a minimum when the international arrangements already referred to are completed. Then it is thought that the cattle plague will be confined to Russia, for if Russia does not succeed in stamping out rinderpest, it may be hoped that the disease will be prevented from extending beyond the neighbourhood of the Steppes. The outbreaks of the past year in Germany which occurred in Silesia and Bavaria, did not extend beyond those districts. In fact, for some years the undoubted outbreaks of cattle plague which Jiave occurred in Germany, uith the single exception of the Hamburg outbreak in 1872, against tlie recurrence of which special measures have been taken, have been confined to the States bordering upon Russia or Austria. Information lias been received of the existence of pleuro-pneumonia during the past year in France, Prussia, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Turkey in Europe, Turkey in Asia, and in the United States. We liave also received from Hamburg five cattle affected with this disease. There is no evidence to support the asser- tions which have often been made, that our foreign imports of cattle add to or keep up this disease in Great Britain. Foot- and-mouth disease has been reported to have existed during the past year in Algeria, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Switzerland, and Turkey in Asia. In addition to the above official information of the existence of fout-and-mouth disease, there is reason to believe that it existed in the Netherlands, as we received during 1873 three cattle from that country suffering from this disease. Siieep-pox is reported to have existed during the past year in Pomerauia, Spain, and Turkey in Europe. We have not, however, received any foreign sheep affected with this disease into any of our ports during the year 1873. As regards Spain this disease only existed in one of the Balearic Islands, and as we get no importation of sheep from Turkey, the only danger of its introduction into this country was from Pomerauia, from which, however, we liave had no direct importation of slieep during the past year. There is reason to believe that the immunity from this disease which we have enjoyed during the last few years is due rather to the regulations of Germany than to our port inspec- tion, which, althougii it prevents the introduction of sheep actually suffering from this disease, would fail to detect it in the incubative stage. Reports have been received of the exis- tence of sheep-scab and glanders from Germany only during tiie past year, but it may be assumed that sheep-scab also exists in Belgium and the Netherlands, as this disease has been detected in sheep brought from both these countries by the in- spectors of the department at the ports. I>"SPECTI0NS. — Foreign : The inspection at the ports of the foreign animals brought to this country is still, as a rule, satis- factorily carried out, and there is no reason to believe that during the past year any diseased animals have been admitted. It has been found, however, that a considerable amount of the time of the inspect jrs has been occupied in examining store animals broufjht in vessels for the use of the crew or passengers. As these animals do not add any appreciable amount to our food supply, it would appear to be unjust that the expense of the inspection of them, which amounts to a considerable sum, should be paid by the public. Irish : The inspection of Irish animals on landing in Great Britain has not hitherto been attempted, nor does there seem any advantage to be gained by such inspeciion, unless effective measures can be taken to detain the animals which are found to be affected with any contagious disease. Home : The inspection of home animals in great Britain has during the past year been performed by 1,678 inspectors, about 22 per cent, of whom are members of the Royal College of Veteriuary Surgeons, about 59 per cent, are members of the police force, and the lemainder are neither veterinary surgeons nor policemen, nor do they appear to possess any qualification entitling them to occupy this office. Neither do the local authorities as a rule appear to see the necessity for professional inspectors, for, although the number of inspectors has been increased from 1,450 in 1871 to 1,678 in 1873, yet the number of veterinary surgeons has decreased from 3/2 in 1871 to 367 in 1873. The number of police officers employed as inspectors has during the sam°. period increased from 738 to 997. Although many of the local authorities do not appoint veterinary surgeons as inspectors, some of them allow their lay inspectors to call in professional aid. Transit by Land : The Lords of the Council have not as yet appointed any travelling inspectors for the purpose of ascertaining that their Orders relating to the transit of animals and the disinfection of vessels and trucks, &c., have been car- ried into effect. THE NEW CORN EXCHANGE AT CAMBRIDGE.— At a cost of £6,000 the Cambridge Corporation are about to erect a new Corn Exchange, the foundation-stone of which was on Tuesday laid by the Mayor of Cambridge. It will form a room, 168 feet long by 55 feet wide, and 60 feet high to the ridge. On the south side there will be a transept 48 feet long by 28 feet wide. The whole will allow space for 220 merchants' desks, without crowding. At the luncheon Mr. Marten, M.P. for Cambridge, said he believed that Cam- bridge would become the eastern metropolis. He also spoke to the need of the new cattle market, that should be iu close proximity to the railway station. Mr. T. V. Webb, chairman of the Cambridgeshire Chamber of Agriculture, in replying to the toast of " Success to agriculture," regretted there was dis- ruption with the labourers ; and if he might say a word of advice to the farmers, it would be that they should attempt a compromise. The combination on the part of the men was right and lawful, and he hoped that the farmers would accede to the propositions now put before them. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 29 THE INFLUENCE OF COLD UPON THE PRODUCTION OF WOOL. By Dr. Hector George. [translated from the TRENCn OF THE "JOURNAL d'aGRICULTURE PRATIQUE," EXPRESSLY FOR " THE MARK LANE EXPRESS."] Amongst the many products which the domestic animals supply to man, wool is one of the most valuable and the most in request by the manufac- turer. Every means are employed to improve that of the indigenous flocks, and to introduce into our counties new species of wool-bearing animals — as the lama, the vicuna, the alpaca, &c. But a quite unexpected transformation has puzzled the breeders, namely, that the simple change of climate greatly modifies the character of the wool, and even causes it wholly to disappear. It is then replaced by a coat of another species, and of a commercial value much inferior to it, so that the object of the acclimations is completely baffled. This influence of the climate — or to speak more correctly, of the temperature — on the produccion and disappearance of the wool, has been proved by numerous observations which it is not without interest to recall in a few words. In order the better to describe these modifications, we must not lose sight of this fundamental observation that the coat is composed of two kinds of hair, variable in their proportions according to the several species ot ani- mals, but which may be made to reappear at pleasure under certain influences, of which the priacipal is as- suredly that of temperature. Of these two sorts of hair, one is rigid, shining, coarse, well fixed. It is the jarre, which exists nearly alone in the ordinary conditions of the horse and the ox. The other hair, hidden under the first, is distinguished by being more curled and tangled and more dull than the jarre and much finer. It is the wool, which exists nearly alone in the Merino sheep and in the Cashmere goats. It is well known that the wool is greatly preferred to the jarre by the manufacturer. The wool, in fact, is much finer, curls more readily, and is found bristling with little scaly asperities (due to its mode of development), which render it more preferable for felting and the manufacture of tissues. From the coats of shee]), goats, rabbits, &c., the coarse and rigid hair is carefully removed. "We can already state that amongst our domestic animals (horses, dogs, cats, &c.) a new kind of hair has been produced at the beginning of winter, which grows between that of the jarre, in order to guarantee the animals against the cold. This winter- hair is wool, and it disappears in the spring with the return of warmth. Let us take a few types of domestic animals, in order to follow in them these modifications of the temperature; we shall find the facts sufficiently curious. If we begin with the horse, we observe that in this country they have little coat except the jarre. But let us go farther north ■ — to Norway, for instance, or Lapland, or Mongolia or Siberia, and we shall find the jarre has disappeared, being displaced by a wool as thick as that of a sheep, consti- tuted of a curled hair, which is a true fleece. The same is stated of the wild horses of Asia and America ; and if we should possess them for their wool only, we should soon be obliged to give them up ; for when once taken and confined in a stable, they lose in a few months their abundant curled fleece, which is replaced by a bright and short coat of hair. This is the jarre which reappears alone. The wool, having become useless, has disappeared. Lastly, as we have often stated, the horses of India, clothed simply with the jarre, when they are taken to the mountaiua of Cashmere or Thibet, are soon covered with wool, these like all other mountains being much colder than the plains. When they again descend into the plain the wool disappears. It is the same with dogs ; and the Indian dogs, when taken to the mountains of Thibet, are covered with wool. On the contrary, dogs that are kept for a long time in a warm country have eventually no coat ; such is the Guinea dog, called alternately Egyptian, African, Turkish, Chinese, Calongo, &e. Of oxen some curious observa- tions have been published by M. Routin in a voyage to America. The following was noticed by him in the Cordilleras, where he found oxen at nearly all altitudes. At a tolerably high level, where the average temperature is from 9 to 10 degrees, animals of the bovine species have a long close-pressed badly-laid coat — in fact, a true wool. Lower down, and in the warm plains, the wool disappeared, and the scanty hair which remains is straight. This is the jarre (these animals are known under the name of pilones). Lastly, with very hot regions, the skin becomes entirely' naked (Calongos) ; and it is ob- served the animals with a naked skia are never found in the cold regions. Even in France we can observe analogous modifica- tions, which are transitory on account of the variations of climate, but which a prolonged influence might render durable. In Auvergne the farmers often send, during the summer, the calves to pasture in the mountains. Those which have passed six mouths in those high regions — very cold — and which descend in the middle of October, are clothed with a true wool, long, curled, and cottony, very different from the jarre of the calves remaining in the low countries. We now go back to find the same effects on the sheep. Our ordinary breeds are, above all, furnished with wool, but they have still a little jarre : this has almost wholly disappeared amongst the Merino sheep, the fleece of which, since the fourteenth century, has produced the fiae wools of Segovia of European reputation. These flocks of Spanish Merinos were transhumants — that is to say, they were led to pasture in summer upon the moun- tains ; and if that fine breed has been successfully estab- lished in France, it is because our climate is very like that of Spain. But we must not ascribe this fleece wholly to the effect of climate. A proof of this is, that our Euro- pean sheep transported into warmer climates (to Peru, Chili, the American valleys, Guinea, &c.) lose their wool at the end of a variable time, and it is then replaced by a short hair, bright, well established — the jarre, in fact — and the wool never after makes its appearance. We have observed the same changes in the Merinos transported by the English into some of the islands of the South Seas. The goats also present analagous modifications, according to the climate. The most renowned of these — the cashmeres — live in the mountains of Thibet, that is, in the very cold regions. Their coats are composed almost exclusively of an abundant and very fine wool, which is manufactured into shawls of unrivalled beauty. Amongst the coat there is scarcely any jarre. When these are brought down into the plains their wool dimi- nishes and their jarre increases, which lowers the quality and the value of their fleece. In 1818, our celebrated manufacturer, Terneau, resolved to take from India the manufacture of these shawls ; and he brought, at a heavy 30 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. expense, from Thibet a flock of goats, intended for the foundation of a race destined to supply the wool for the Indian shawls. But the Thibet goats quickly degene- rated in France. Other attempts proved also fruitless, and it was found necessary to give up the idea of pre- serving in these goats the quality of their wool in a climate different to their ovvn. The wool of these goats dis- appeared completely in the warm climates, like that of certain low and burning vallies of America ; and it is then replaced by a short, bright, well-set hair, which is no other than the jarre — a very curious example of the influence of temperature on the production and predominance of oue or the other of these two species of animal coverings. From what has been stated, the breeders of animals may draw a very clear conclusion that whatever food and care they may bestow upon wool-bearing animals, they are not the only condition proper to soften their fleeces. For exotic animals which we wish to acclimatise, it requires the nearest possible approach to the condition of the native climate ; and for indigenous animals themselves the question of temperature has great importance. The jarre may be compared to summer clothing, and the wool to that of winter. Nature furnishes so much more abundantly the winter clothing that the animal may resist the most severe frost. It remains to determine the extreme degree of cold that an animal can support ; and, when once that limit is kuown, it will be necessary to approach the nearest possible to it, in order to produce in the animal all that it can furnish of the best in quality and quantity of wool. The mountains offer, at dilferent heights, all the climates desirable, and may become a fertile field of experiments of which all the known ob- servations warrant the success. THE LONDON MARKET FROM A FOREIGN POINT OF VIEW. [translated for the mark lane express.] A pamphlet has recently been published in l?ome, written by Cavalier Olshen, Director of the Bollettino del Comizio Agrario, which treats upon the cattle markets of the largest capitals in Europe, London, Paris, and Berlin. It may be iuteresting to know the author's opinion respecting the cattle market of the British metro- polis. London, says the Cavalier, is not only the greatest city in Great Britain, but it is the greatest city in the -world. The visitor from the rural districts, whilst he walks through the man}' streets, and observes the im- mense and increasing crowd of people, asks himself the question — by what means agriculture is able to provide for the nourishment of such a multitude of persons, and how are the products of agricultural industry brought to market to supply the wants of such colossal wealth. In respect to the consumption of meat, it is very apparent to any one who makes even a short staj iu London and gives his attention to the subject, that these demands are enormous. Well, this large demand is supplied exclusively from a single slaughter market for cattle, from which the butchei-s of the metropolis make their purchases. Owing to the excessive growth of London, the former cattle mark';t in the city became too restricted and alto- gether inaccessible, and there was opened in the northern part, in the suburb of Islington, in 1857, an immense new market called the Islington Cattle market. Here the ar- rangements, formed upon the best and most accurate re- sults derived from long experience, excellent aud simple of themselves, make this market a model for others, and he admiration of all visitors. The circumference of the piazza, or space occupied by the market and its a])proaches, covers 285,960 square metres; one half of this area is intended for the animals, and the other for the approaches to the market itself. Where the animals intended for sale are exposed is a quadrangular space of 03,832 square metres in extent, paved, and well- drained by means of subterranean drains. Divers basins of iron provide the space abundantly viith water. In the middle stands au octa- gonal building with a tower, which has a clock facing each way. This building, which is called the Bank Buildings, contains the oflices of the employes of the m.arket, certain rooms for banking purposes, an ottice tor tickets, a pjstal and telegraph station. Upon oue of the sides of this vast piazza one observes two great buildings covered in with roofs and open at the sides, with a pavement which is two feet above the level of the piazza. Here are exj)osed for sale the pigs and calves, and each of these buildings is able to accommodate 1,000 head of these animals. The space covered by the market is divided by a broad street into two parts — one being intended for the exhibition of the bovine race, and the other for the sheep. For the latter there are enclosures, where from 20 to 30 head can enter, and on the whole there may be collected 30,000 of these animals. For the cattle have been erected very substantially-built com- partments and bars, to which the animals are bound by their horns and by the neck. The space intended for the cattle will contain 7,000 head. To shelter conveniently such of the beasts as arrive upon the piazza before the days of sale, as well as those which remain unsold, there have been constructed 12 great lairs on the western side antt •>uother 12 on the southern side. Those on the western .."e intended for the sheep, and contain space enough for I'^.OOO of these animals : those on the southern are intended fov' the cattle, aud accommodate about 3,000 head. Upon one t'de these lairs are entirely open, and in their vicinity there a.""- situated several slaughter-houses. In order to facilitate the business, the City of London, which has carried out all the arrangements for the market, has caused to be built in the immediate neigh- bourhood of the market itself five large hotels, where the buyers and the sellers of the animals are able to find accommodation and convenient lodgings. Twice in the week (on Monday and Thursday) the market is held; but the most important day is the ISIonday. On that day we found, for example, on sale, about 5,000 head of cattle, 24,000 sheep, 400 calves, and 400 pigs ; whilst on the Thursday following there were only one-half that number. The sale of the beasts takes place in the market itself, and the commission agents who efi'ect these sales receive accommodation, diff'ering according to the description of animals. The auctions are held by an agent, who stands amongst tlie auimals, upon a space which is limited by a cord, and he is assisted by a clerk, who makes a note of the sale. The butchers who are pur- chasers take their stand opposite to this enclosure. The" management of the JMetropolitan Cattle Market of Lon- don is entrusted to a director of the market, two con- trollers, aud two inspectors, with a number of drovers specially employed to drive the cattle. These are persons whose ability aud probity have been stoutly tested by the director of the market, nor can they exercise their calling without a special permission from the director himself. They do not receive, as the other employes named, a fixed salary, but they are paid by the persons who avail themselves of their services. The auimals goiug to the THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 31 market are allowed to traverse the streets of London only at night after 12 o'clock, and the animals sold can be taken away from the market only in the morning until 11 o'clock, and then again after 7 iu the evening. During the time of the prevalence of cattle disease, the Metro- politan Market was exclusively used for slaughtering pur- poses, and owners were not allowed to remove their ani- mals to any other markets, but to slaughter within eight days. The butchers of London are divided into three classes — the wholesale, the retail, and the contractors. The wholesale butchers purchase live-stock upon the mar- ket, where they kill and dispose of the meat without dividing it or at the most quartering it. The sales are made at their own houses or at the meat market. These wholesale butchers often slaughter in a week 200 head of cattle, and more than 1,000 sheep, especially during the season when Parliament sits and at Christmas. The retailers slaughter a few animals, providing from the mar- ket the remainder of the meat which they require for sale. Besides this great market for animals, there takes place in Loudon daily, with the exception of the Sundays and holidays, three great meat markets — the Metropolitan New Market, Leadenhall, and Whitechapel. All three are situated within the radius of the City. That of the New Metropolitan is of great extent and the most frequented. At Leadenhall Market are also sold rabbits, poultry, and wild-fowl. All these markets are held under the control of the inspectors, whose duty it is to maintain order and to examine the meat which is brought thither for sale, and to seize any that is unwholesome. The quantity which is thus annually seized amounts to a considerable total, that is, from 90,000 to 113,500 kilos. According to statistical returns, there were consumed daily in the metropolis about 1,100 cattle and 5,200 sheep, or for the week 7,700 cattle and 30, 400 sheep. It is evident that English agriculture is not able to suffice for such an enormous consumption, and London has there- fore to look for provisions from other countries, where the competition is carried on very actively to sup- ply this necessity. At the Islington jMarket, not only English, but beasts from all parts of the Continent may be seen, and how considerable is the share taken by the foreigners appears clearly from the fact that from the Continent are furnished annually to the British Isles, in round numbers, about 227,500 head of fat cattle, 55,700 calves, 914,000 sheep, and 132,900 pigs. The largest importations are derived from France, Holland, and Ger- many ; then from Denmark, Portugal, and Spain j and even a few from Austria. THE LUMBERING BUSINESS IN MICHIGAN. TO THE EDITOR OF TUE MARK LANE EXPRESS. Sir, — I am inclined to believe that a sketch of Michi- gan stock in connection with the lumbering business will be interesting to your readers. At Millington station on the Bay City Railroad I was met by Mr. Murphy, jun., who conveyed me with a very substantial tram, that could go to the lumber camps of Messrs. Avery and Murphy. Here are thirteen thousand acres of land, owned by this company, from which they had sent the logs down Gooden Creek at high water iuto Cass River, from there boomed and rafted to the mill at Bay City. They have cut upwards of six million feet of lumber at this point for tlic past eight or nine years. There are two camps on the tract, and upwards of eighty men have been at work during the winter, thirty teams of horses, and nine yoke of oxen. Here T found some thorough- bred Shorthorns, and about forty-five very superior grades ; also seventeen large heavy mares, which they bred to their large Clydesdale horse Young Richmond : these mares are all of a very superior character, and have been hauling logs all the winter, but have recently turned out to foal. There were seventeen yearlings thus bred, all from the Clydesdale, uniform in good quarters, short backs, and much substance, varying in colour. It would be diflicult to find a better lot of colts in this country for heavy draught. They are destined for the lumbering business and other heavy work. I visited this establishment last winter, and it was ])leasing to see with what sys- tem the business was carried on. From Millington I went to Port Huron, near which Messrs. Avery and Murphy own ten thousand acres of fine land, and the logs are conveyed in the same way by water to their mills at that place. Upwards of six million feet of lumber have been cut by them yearly at this point for the past twenty-one years. These mills are on a more extensive scale than those at Bay City. Here I met Mr. Stebbins, the agent for this company, to whom I am indebted for much kind atten- tion. The stables are near the mills, and we were soon inside of them examining the Shorthorns. I found at the head of the herd Duke of Aiidrie 23rd, bred by Mr. Alex- ander, of Kentucky, and purchased of hiin for 3,000 dollars. He is amongst the best of the Dukes ; still, like all the rest of them, lacking iu the crops ; but he has a straight top and bottom, and is good in his thigh, twist, and rumps. Although I cannot admire these Dukes, this is the second best I have met with. The Miss Wileys 15th, 24th, and 25th are superior animals, all purchased at high figures. ^Yelcome, bred by Mr. Joseph Beasley, PlifFord Hall, England, is a very fine heifer, and her calf is very superior. Michigan Casket is a still better heifer, bred by Mr. Cruikshanks, Sityon, Aberdeenshire, Scot- land. Michigan Daisy, bred by ilr. Kanildie, Scotland, is a very superior heifer, and will make a good show cow. The three last imported heifers are three years ojd each, and are hard animals to be beaten. There are soire heifers of the Rose of Sharon tribe, which are much ad- mired and valued by their owners; but I consider Miss Barnum 2nd preferable to either, and her heifer-calf is very superior ; a cow with such quality, symmetry, and substance, proving an excellent breeder, although not ranking in the fashiona'ile class of fancy, is cue of the plums of the herd. She is descended from Mrs. IMott, therefore traces back to the importation of 1817, a family that are getting into better repute every day. The better they are known the more they are appreciated. This cow was bred by Mr. John Cunningham, of Kentucky. There are others in the herd with shoi't pedigrees that are not to be despised. I\lr. John B. Sanborn kindly invited me to view his herd, and we were conveyed there behind an excellent driving mare to see ihe Shorthorns. Mr. Sanborn ordered out some of the best, and they were tied in a row for close examination. It would certainly have been a grand feature in any state fair. At the head stood Highland Chief, aed an excellent bull he is. I will not attempt to enumerate his good points for they were many, his deficiencies are but slight. This bull, as is asserted, was very superior to the two which triumphed over him at the last state fair. Mistakes of judgment in selecting animals for premiums are ruinous to good breeding. This bull was owned by Mr. G. F. Wastell at the time he met 32 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. with this inglorious defeat at Grand Rapids. Jenny Lind, bred by Mr. A. E. Hector, of Colly Hill, Scotland, perfect in symmetery, quality, and substance, short legs, fine bone, and I think is an animal that cannot be easily beaten in the showing. Golden Drop is a three-year-old bredbylMr. S. Campbell, Hamilton, Aberdeenshire, Scot- land. It would be difficult to decide between Jenny Lind and this heifer, choice in colour men might prefer red to roan, or vice versa. This heifer's calf is a good one. Countess of Henton is another superior heifer, iliss Bell, bred by Mr. Robert Miller, Pickering, Canada, is a good heifer and has taken several first prizes. Mr. Sanborn has some Rose of Sharou heifers, which he values highly, and I think will nick well with Highland Chief. Duchess of Oakland he values highly, and there are others of short pedigrees worthy of special notice. Earl of Oxford is a bull valued by those preferring the fashionable Duchess strain, but he having been injured when on the way from England, and in very low condition, could not be criticised. Mr. Sanborn paid a very high price for him, through the appearance of his produce ; but I will back that of Highland Chief against him, notwithstanding his fashionable pedigree. I prefer the true made animals to pedigree, or fashion, when they breed uniformly good. ]\Iy opinion is that Messrs. Avery and Murphy, and Mr. J. Sanborn will be difficult opponents for ^breeders to meet in the showing of next fall. Yours,, Wm. H. Sotham. Cass Hotel, Detroit, Michigan, May lOt/i, 1874. MANOEIAL In the Court of Error in the Exchequer Chamber, the case of Smith v. Sowerby has raised a question of some interest in rural districts. Tiie point is as to the right of lords of manors to shoo*' over enclosed lands in their manors. The question has arisen repeatedly since Enclosure Acts became numerous, and in the case of Sir James Graham, some years ago, the House of Lords affirmed the right, by reason of the clause, always in some form inserted in Enclosure Acts, preserving the rights of the lord of the minor, including right of shooting over all the enclosed lands. In the present cise the question was whether the lord has the right of shoot- ing over all the enclosures from the waste of his manor. Tiie plaintiff is the allottee of a piece of land formerly part of the waste of the Manor of Messingliam, in the county of Lincoln. The defendant represents the lord of the manor. The plaintiff, an allottee, sued him for shooting over his allotment under the Enclosure Act. The defendant set up the usual clause reserving the rights of the lord, and the short question was tliis — "Whether, by virtue of the Enclosure Act of 1798, the allottee of the waste land or the lord of the manor was entitled to sport over the waste land enclosed. Two Judges in the Com- mon Pleas held that the allottee, and not the lord, was entitled ; but Mr. Justice Honjman differed, thinking that the decision in the House of Lords decided the case. The question was whether it did — that is, whether tliere was any substantial difference in the present case from that of Sir J. Graham. The terms of the clause reserving the rights of the lord in this case were the following"." That nothing shall prejudice or lessen the right or interest of the lord of the manor in or to the seigniory or royalties incident to the manor, but that he shall have ail rights on liberties of hawking, hunting, cours- ing, fishing, and fowling witliin the manor, pertaining to the manor, or belonging to the lord, or which have bi*en hereto- fore lield or exercised by the lord or his, ancestors." It was contended on the part of the de'eudant, wlio represents the lord of the manor, that tliis iuchided the right of shooting over the waste land of the manor, and that, therefore, it is reserved over the enclosed portions of the waste. Tiie Court of Common Pleas, by two Judges to one, decided against the lord, snd the defendant, representing the lord, now appealed. Mr. Field, Q C, and Mr. Barker were for the defendant, the appellant; Mr. John Mellor and Mr. Jeune were against nim. On thu part of the appellant, who set up the right of the lord of the manor, Sir James Graham's case was relied upon, and it was urged that the present case was substantially the same — it was part of the contract with the lord of the manor in cases of enclosure that his rights of sporting over the wastes should be preserved, and it was the object of the Legislature to preserve it. There was once, indeed, as the Judges observed, a notion that lords of manors had a right of shooting over all the lands within the manor, even though the private property of other persons ; but this lias long been exploded, and all that is now claimed on the part of the lords of manors is the right of shooting over the wastes of their manors. This right it was the object, it was said, of the Legislature to preserve to the lords of manors in Enclosure Acts. On tlie other side it was insisted that Sir James Graham's case was RIGHTS. different, because th e Act gave the lord in express terms the right to shoot over the land to be enclosed ; whereas here there was only a reservation of such rights as had existed over the manor, and, it was urged, the lord could not have any "right" in the waste of tlie manor except as incident to his right of ownership, which was gone. In short, it was urged that the right ot shooting was not a manorial right, but a right of ownership, and only manorial rights were reserved. In reply, it was urged that the contract with the lord was that he should retain his rights of sport over the allotted lands ; that this was clearly the object and intention of the Legislature, and that technical objections ought not to prevail against it. Surely, in common sense, the power of the lord of a manor to shoot over his wastes was a " right," and, if so, it was reserved ? The Lord Chief Justice observed that if the words had been, as in Sir James Graham's case, that the lord should have the right of shooting "over the allotted lands," the case would have been free from doubt. As it was, however, there was room for doubt whether the Legislature had used language to carry out their assumed intention. But the question was, whether, looking at the scope of the Act, it could not be seen that the effect was substantially the same as in Sir James Graham's case, and that the effect was to preserve the lord's right of shooting over the lands enclosed from his waste. — At the close of the argument, the Court took time to consider their judgment. THE HORSE'S WALK.— In all pictures, from the cartoon iu Punch to the works of our ancient and modem animal painters, how seldom do we see a horse at a walk properly put upon paper or canvas ! I have given this subject much attention, and must confess that it is one of the most difficult to draw accurately, if not t/ie most difficult, an animal painter has to contend with. Without wishing to withhold merit from the very first-rate representations we see in the Illustrated London News of our many reviews and processions, what a sameness there is in the figures represented there of the " horse at a walk" ! — three legs down and one inthe air is the general >ule. Again, look at the white pony in Sir E. Landseer's " Deer Stalkers Returning," with his near fore foot and off hind foot off the ground together. A horse in starting to walk takes his hind foot up first, on whichever side he is made to " lead off with." The fore foot is removed to make room for it, and the moment it is placed in or nearly the same print, the other hind foot is taken up to replace the other fore foot, as iu the first instance. " A horse at a walk" should be put upon canvas with the fore and hind foot under him, and the other two moderately extended. The best illustration I know of a " horse at a walk" is the frontispiece in Corbet's Tales and Traits of Sporting Life, drawn, I believe, by the author. Animal painters seldom study their professijn in detail, and are not sufficiently close observers of nature — many, I have no doubt, could not tell you which legs a cow gets up on first, her fore or her hind ones. — Mr. Septimus Field in The Field. [The sketch referred to in Tales and Traits is not by the author, but his brother, Edward Corbet, who is an animal painter.] THE FARMER'S MAGAZINB. 33 ROYAL ACxRICULTURAL SOCIETY OP ENGLAND. Monthly Council : Wednesday, June 3. — Present : Mr. Holland, President, in the chair ; the Duke of Bed- ford ; Earl Cathcart ; the Earl of Powis, tlie Earl of Leicester ; the Hon. W. Egertoii, M.P. ; Sir A. K. Macdonald, Bart. ; Mr. Barnett, Mr. Bowly ; Mr. Uent ; Mr. Edmonds ; Mr. Brandreth Gibbs ; IMr. Horley ; Mr. Hornsby ; Mr. Bowen Jones ; Colonel Kingscote, M.P. ; Mr. Laws ; Mr. Leeds ; Mr. M'lntosh ; Mr. Masfen ; Mr. Randell ; Mr. Ridley, M.P ; Mr. Shuttle- worth ; Mr. Statter ; Mr. Torr, M.P. ; Mr. Jabez Tur- ner ; Mr. Wilby, M.P. ; Mr. W. Wells ; Lieut.-Col. Wilson ; Mr. Jacob Wilson. Lord Calthorpe was elected a Governor of the Society. The following members were elected : Allsopp, Samuel Charles, M.P., Marchington, Uttoxeter. J ach, Fhilip Elsich, Brumfield, Salop. Butler, Frank, Childerditch Hall, Brentwood. Chadwick, James, High Bank, Prestwich, Manchester. Cheesman, Frederick Walter Morley, Northiam, Hawkhurst. Corcoran, James, High-street, Bedford. Crowther, James Firth, Knowl-grove, Mirfield, Yorks. Dean, Seth Ellis, Dovvsby Hall, Folkingham. Easton, Richard, Stone House, Taunton. Egar, Samuel Wryde, Thorney, Carabs. Evans, Frederick, Sawston, Canibs. Exeter, the Bishop of, the Palace, Exeter. Faulkner, William, Rothersthorpe, Northampton. Firmstone, William Francis, Rockingham Hall, Hagley. Foster, John N., Sandy-place, Sandy, Beds. Franckliu, John LieU, Gonalstone Hall, Nottingltam. Giddons, William, Walpole St. Peters, Wisbcach. Haughton, David, Cosford, Sbitnal. Hawkins, Edmund, Diuthill Shrewsbury. Hawkins Robert Samuel, Broad-street, Oxford. Hawkshaw, Sir John, Holly combe, Sussex. Hayward, Charles Cooper, Southill, Biggleswade, Hine, George, Oakley, Bedford. Horner, Ednard, May- place, Cray ford. Horsford, James, 7, Well-street, Bedford. Hunt, Frederick, Harniondsworth, Slough. Ivatt, Charles Edward, Rampton, Cambridge. King, John, Rowingtou, Warwick. Lees, Benjamin Christy, Sandon, Roystou. Leuey, Frederick, Wateringbury, Maidstone. Little, William Cutlack, Stags' Holt, March, Cambs. Mather, Henry, 43, Deane-road, Liverpool. Macandrew, Henry Cockburn, Midmilis, Inverness. Mott, William, Littleport, Isle of Ely. Munk, Harry, Holme Pierrepout, Nottingham. Nunuerley, William Belton, Whitchurch, Salop. Owen, Wilham, Hendre Vaur, Abergele. Parker, Banastre, Riccall Hall, York. Perry, William Henry, Sytch House, Claverly, Bridgnorth. Richitrds, Richard, Glascold, Llansilin, Oswestry. Richards, Westley, Ashwell, Oakham. Robinson, John Wright, Tittou Hall, Wyberton, Boston. Sharp, Francis B., Finedon, WeUingborough. Shaw, John, Normanton House, Derby. Shaw, the Rev. Morton, Rougham Rectory, Bury St. Ed- munds. Sheraton, John Robmson, EUesmere, Salop. Sibley, Charles Francis, Annables Farm, Harpenden, Luton. Slack, Alfred Soham, Ely. Sladen, Frederick St. Barbe, Hartshonrne Manor, Watford. Smith, Garland, Eaton Constantine, Wellington. Stanley, Lieut.-Col. the Hon. F. A., M.P., Witherslack HaU, Grange, Carnforth. Stone, Henry Robert, Bedfords, Haverine-atte-Bower, Essex. Tillyer, Richard Henry, Heathrow, Hounslow. Toller, James Blaxhall, Wickham Market. Topham, Joseph, Crown Farm, Great Staunton, St. Ncots. Verney, Commander Edmund Hope, R.N,, Rhianvn, Menai Bridge, Anglesey. Vickers, Edward, Newbridge Farm, Billingshurst. W^armington, Cornehus, Granville HaU, Kiuton, Evesham. Welch, Bryan S., Gringly-ou-the-Hill, Bawtry. Wilson, Porter, 3, Westgate, Louth. Finances. — Colonel Kingscote, M.P., presented the report, from v\hich it appeared that the Secretary's receipts during the past month had been duly examined by the Committee, and by Messrs. Quilter, Ball and Co., the So- ciety's accountants, and found correct. The balance at the Bankers on May 31 was £3,162 lis. 6d., while £2,000 remains at deposit. This report was adopted. Journal. — Mr. J. Dent Dent (chairman) reported the recommendation of the committee that the editor of the Agricultural Gazette be allowed to have electrotypes of the woodcuts in the last number of the Journal at his own expense. Also that the Secretary be authorised to make a tour in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark, for the purpose of inquiring into the stock-faruiing of those countries witli reference to the probable supplies of cattle from there to the United Kingdom. This report having been adopted, Mr. Dent gave notice that at the next meeting of the Council he would ask for a grant of £150 for the investi- gation referred to. Chemical. — Mr. W. Wells (chairman) reported that the committee had received Dr. Voelcker's Quarterly Report, and had ordered it to he printed for further con- sideration at the next monthly meeting. This report was adopted. General, Bedford. — Mr. Shuttleworth reported the following recommendations of the Committee : (1.) That the Home Secretary be asked to allow the Society the services otthe usual number of Londou police. (2.) Tbat the Bedford meeting be advertised at a cost not exceeding £700. (3.) Tliat Professor Brown aud Mr. Hunt be asked to act as Veterinary Inspectors at the Bedford meeting. (!•.) That the pupils of the Bedford middle-class pubhc sciiool be admitted to the showyard at half-price on one of tlie shilling days. (5.) Tliat the Royal Agricultural College Club having failed to obtain accommodation in the town, they be allowed to have their annual dinner in tlie steward's refreslimeut room. (6.) That the secretary be authorised to make arrangements for providing a turret-clock at tbe entrances. (7.) That Messrs. Hipwell and fons be appointed purveyors of corn, meal, &c., at a tariff to he approved by the steward of forage. (8.) That a plan of Bedford tie printed on the back of the showyard plan which is published in the catalogue. This report was adopted subject to the following addi- tion, which was moved by Mr. Dent Dent, seconded by Mr. Jacob Wilson, and carried with tv.'o dissentients : " That members' tickets admit to the stand at the Horse Ring." Mr. Shuttleworth then presented the report of the surveyor in reference to the showyard works at Bed- ford, which were stated to be in a forward condition, and on account of which the contractor was entitled to a pay- ment of £1,200. This report was adopted. Education. — The Duke of Bedford (Chairman) moved, on behalf of the committee, and in accordance with notice given at the monthly Council, "" That the Education Grant for the current year be increased to the sum of £500, for the purpose of carrying out the examina- tions of pupils at middle-class schools, on the plau adopted by the Council at their last meeting." This resolution was seconded by Mr. Dent Dent, aud carried unanimously. The following recommendations of the committee were also adopted; (I) That a syllabus of the examinations to be held in November be sent to the head masters of middle-class schools ; aud (2) That the secretary be instructed to advertise these examinations as soon as possible. The Hon. Wilbkaham Egekton, M.P., then moved 3i THE FARMiCR'S MAGAZESfE. that the following statements and recommendal ious be em- bodied in a communication from the President of the Society to the Lord President of the Privy Council : The Council of the Koyal Agricultural Society are still of opinion that, in order to deal efficiently with the whole question of the contagious and infectious diseases of animals, there is urgent need of such recommendations as were made by them to the Right Hon. W. E. Forster, M.P., as Vice- President of the Privy Council, in December, 1872. Several of these recommendations would, however, re- quire the sanction of Parliament to enable them to be put in force ; and, in view of the pressing necessity of dealing immediately with the renewed outbreak of foot- and-mouth disease, the Council btg to make to the Government the following recommendations ; 1. That sec. 4 of the Animals (Amendment) Order of 1873 be revoked. 2. That the orders relating to foot-and-mouth disease, enumerated in the first schedule of the Animals (Amendment) Order of 1873, be reissued. 3. That under the authority given in sec. 57 of the Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act, which makes the exposure or carriage of animals affected with a contagious or infectious disease an offence against the A.ct, the Privy Council should issue an order to facilitate the discovery of disease (especially foot-and-mouth disease) in lairs or other places, adjacent to or connected with a market or fair, or where horses or animals are commonly placed before exposure for sale (these being the words of the Act), with a view to preventing the movement of animals to fairs and mar- kets from such lairs and other places where disease exists ; and to the adequate punishment of offenders against this section ot the Act. _ The Council regret that they cannot accept the conclu- sions of the Select Committee of the House of Commons on the Contagious Diseases of Animals with reference to Foot-and-mouth Disease ; and they are of opinion that the evidence of English agriculturists who were examined before the committee does not justify the conclusious of the committee with reference to that disease. With regard to the scientific evidence takeu before that committee, the Council think that too much stress was laid upon the impossibility of stamping out the disease without very stringent measures, and too little weight attached to the importance of limiting the centres of disease at the commencement of an outbreak. The evidence of cattle dealers also largely influenced the decision of the committee respecting foot-and-mouth disease. The Council, however, submit that the interest of a cattle dealer in the animals which he buys or sells is limited to a few days, and that he has no interest in the suppression of foot-and-mouth disease; while, by the ex- clusion of that disease from the Animals Order of 1871, he escapes liabilities to fines for trading in diseased animals. The farmer, however, has to bear the great pecuniary loss which results from the animals of his farm been attacked by this disease. In the majority of cases the disease is conveyed to his home-stock by the purchase of extraneous animals, necessary for the purposes of his farm. In moving this resolution, Mr. Egerton stated that he was asking the Council to pursue the same policy as they had done on former occasions. The deputation from the Council which had waited upon the Lord President after the last monthly meeting had been requested to place the recommendations of the Council in writing ; and the Lord President had also stated that until the Report of the Select Committee of the House of Commons on the Con- tagious Diseases (Animals) Act had been protested against hj the Royal Agricultural Society and other agricultural institutions on behalf of English agriculturists, it must be taken to represent their opinions. Mr. Egerton contended, however, that the Committee had not been guid;;d by the evidence of agriculturists, but by that of veterinary sur- geons, and principally by that of cattle salesman. The Committee included only six English county members (representing Huntingdon, Norfolk, Leicester, Essex, Sussex, and Northumberland). Out of 47 witnesses ex- amined, only seven were English agriculturists, and all of these who gave evidence with regard to foot-and-mouth disease were in favour of stringent regulations being en- forced, as also were the Scotch farmers who were examined on the question. Mr. Egerton gave an analysis of the evidence of these witnesses, and then showed that the veterinary surgeons who were examined were very much divided in opinion, summarising their opinions as follows . Professor Brown is in favour of leaving foot-and- mouth disease as it is in 57 and 58 sections of Act, unless much more stringent measures were taken for its preven- tion. Professor Simonds says that he would make it an offence to expose an animal affected with foot-and-mouth disease in any market or fair, or in any sale-yard, or any lair connected therewith. He is in favour of slaughtering fat animals when disease breaks out at ports, and sending store animals back. Mr. Fisher would not allow any cattle to leave any farm without the farmer signing a declaration that the cattle to be removed were clear of the disease, and that they had not been in contact with diseased animals so many days. Mr. Lepper, veterinary surgeon at Aylesbury, would keep animals affected with foot-and-mouth disease by themselves, and all animals which had been in contact with them. Would have every farmer report the foot- and-mouth disease when it broke out. Mr. Thompson, veterinary surgeon, Aberdeenshire, would not leave it optional for the local authorities to adopt regulations for the foot-and-mouth disease. I would make it imperative for all local authorities to adopt the present regulations and the powers of the Privy Council Orders. Mr. Goodlet, Forfarshire, thinks foot-and-mouth dis- ease would certainly be abolished if the places where the disease broke out were declared infected, and farmers prohibited from removing infected animals and those iu* contact with them. Morrow, Irish grazier and cattle exporter, approves of present restrictions, though opposed fo any increase thereof. Professor Brown, in an article in i\iQ Royal Agricul- tural Journal, on foot-and-mouth disease, says, " Much injury is produced by turning animals out of a market into adjacent lairs to wait till the next market day ; such places become in times of prevalence of the disease centres of infection, which should be dealt with strin- gently, and regularly cleaned and disinfected under proper provisions." Asks the question, is foot-and- mouth disease an affection of such a serious character as lo render a high degree of circumspection necessary or desirable ? The answer must be left to the agriculturists : if they decide the object is worth the cost, there need be no difficulty in carrying out regulations which have been suggested. In reply to the question whether the object is worth the cost, Mr. Egerton stated that in Cheshire 130,000 animals had been attacked during the last four years, and the average loss per head was considered to be as much as £4, although only 2,000 animals had died in consequence of the disease; but such an enormous loss in one county alone showed that it was not only an agricultural but a public question. In the unavoidable absence of Colonel Kingscote, C.B., M.P., Mr. Jabez Turner seconded the resolution. He referred to the fact that a deputation, stated to consist of butchers, cattle-dealers, farmers, and graziers connected with Liverpool, had waited upon the Duke of Richmond THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 35 asking for free trade iu diseased animals, and they had taken care to get their arguments widely published, whereas the public were not informed of the enormous losses which they sustained in consequence of the attacks of foot-and-mouth disease. Mr. Randell suggested that a paragraph should be added to the resolutions, stating the loss of meat to the public caused by this disease. He thought it could be shown that the loss sustained had been ten times as great from foot-and-mouth disease as from cattle plague ; and he would advocate measures quite as stringent as those which prevailed during the cattle plague. Mr. Dent Dent reminded the Council that when the subject was discussed at the last monthly meeting, he had urged that the recommendations to be submitted to the Lord President of the Council should be put on paper. It now appeared that when the deputation waited upon the Duke of Richmond, he had made a request to that effect, although the Council had no report before them of what had taken place at the interview which the deputa- tion had had with the Lord President. He thought that Mr. Egerton had made a very able speech, which he should have delivered in the House of Commons, as it to a great extent reflected npon the Report of the Select Committee of the House of Commons, of which he (Mr. Dent) had been a member. He avowed that the immense divergence of opinion expressed by the numerous witnesses who gave evidence before that Select Committee, had led him to the conclusion, which he had arrived at with much regret, that the disease should not be interfered with except as provided in clause 57 of the Contagious Diseases (Ani- mals) Act. "With regard to the proposition of Mr. Egerton, he could not give support to it further than that he agreed with the proposal embodied in the third recommendation. As to the subsequent paragraphs, he considered that it was beyond the province of the Council to criticise a report of a Select Committee of the House of Commons, especially as he felt sure that not one member of the Council in ten had read the evidence upon which that report was founded. Much stress has been laid upon the loss which was caused by an attack of foot- and-mouth disease, and if these assertions were true they ought to be established beyond the possibility of a doubt ; but the increase in the number of cattle in the country the last four years had led him to the opinion that the loss arising from the disease had been very much exagge rated. He gave the following figures to show the increase in cattle between 1869 and 1873 inclusive : England 44.3,428 Scotland 97,140 Ireland 531,209 Total 1,071,777 It had been stated that the Select Committee had been •' influenced by cattle dealers ; but, in fact, cattle dealers were a necessity, and could not be done without, there- fore they should have their proper influence. Finally, he stated that, although he did not agree with the necessity of imposing additional regulations, he considered that if any were to be established they ought to be made uniform throughout the country. He therefore moved the fol- lowing amendment : " That inasmuch as the issuing of ^.different regulations by various local authorities in respect ■of cattle diseases has been proved to cause serious injury to trade, and has in no way checked the progress of disease, it seems to this Council undesirable that any dis- ■ cretionary power to make such regulations should be given to local authorities. And as any uniform regula- tions which would prove efiicient must be of so stringent a character as to be almost unbearable, it is not desirable to make any further order with respect to foot-and-mouth 4isease ; and that in the opinion of the Council it is de- sirable that any Orders of the Privy Council with a view to the above objects should be uniform and compulsory, and not left to the discretion of the local authorities." Earl Cathcart seconded the amendment. He held that desperate diseases required desperate remedies ; and the question, therefore, arose, whether foot-and-mouth was a desperate disease or not, as he considered that the remedy required would be a desperate one indeed. With regard to this question he would take Mr. Egerton's own figures, and ask him whether the loss of £4 per head sustained by the county of Chester on 130,000 animals in the course of four years was at all comparable to the loss from cattle plague sustained by that county, when nearly the whole of their cattle were annihilated. Di- verse authorities and half-measures could not possibly bring about any effectual remedy ; and although he ad- mitted that much loss of meat was caused by foot-and- mouth disease, as well as loss of milk and of oiTspring, in consequence of diminished fecundity, he held that they could not adopt the rigorous measures that would be re- quired to check the disease effectually. Mr. Jacob Wilson remarked that it should be re- membered that foot-and-mouth disease had not been at so low an ebb for many years as during the cattle plague restrictions ; and it was therefore only fair to assume that this fact was the result of those restrictions. While those restrictions were iu force, fairs and markets were not held, and, in his opinion, very much to the benefit of the farmer, the dealer, and the consumer. He rarely buys an animal from a fair or market even now, but always, if possible, direct from a farm ; and this was the universal and necessary practice during the cattle plague restrictions. So far as he was able to ascertain, the cattle dealers then made just as much money without fairs and markets as they do now ; while it is certain that foot- and-mouth disease is fostered and kept active at the ports in England and Ireland, aud at the localities of great fairs and markets, through the medium of the lairs aud fields in the occupation of dealers. It is now well known that they employ veterinary surgeons to select those animals that are " safe " to be sent to the fair or market the day before the fair or market is held. The tainted animals which do not exhibit outward signs of disease are thus selected to be sent to the market, and to become centres of infection in the dift'erent localities to which they are sent, and where they develope the disease a few days or a week or more after purchase. The disease is kept up throughout the season in consejuence of the animals consigned to these dealers being sent week after week to the same tainted ground, and in contact with animals which are visibly diseased, and which for that reason cannot be sent to a fair or market to be sold without entailing upon the dealer the infliction of a fine. He considered that the recent increase in the number of cattle was due to the fact that the fear of disease and the high price of stock had combined to make farmers breed more home stock instead of relying so much on purchases as they had hitherto done. Colonel Wilson agreed with the first part of Mr. Dent's amendment, viz., that the regulation should be uniform aud compulsory ; but he disagreed with the latter part. The Hon. Wilbraham Egerton explainedthat thisob- ject was sought to be attained by the first paragraph of his resolution, which referred to the previous recommenda- tions of the Council, npon which he by no means wished to turn his back. But as many of those recommenda- tions could not be carried out without a new Act of Par- liament, he was anxious to induce the Privy Council to do at once what lay in their power towards checking the spread of foot-and-mouth disease, without waiting for the result of further legislation, which he nevertheless hoped c 2 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. would soon follow ia the direction of the previous recom- mendations of the Council. With regard to the increase in the number of cattle, he observed that it had not been c ontended the foot-and-mouth disease diminished their nnniber greatly ; but that it diminished the production of meat and milk. On a division Mr. Dent's amendment was lost by a majority of one, 11 members voting for it and 12 against. Mr. Dent then moved the omission of the last three paragraphs of Mr. Egerton's proposition. Mr. John Toke, M.P., seconded this amendment, and took the opportunity of stating that he had attended with the deputation which had been referred to by Mr. Jabez Turner, and which consisted of butchers and cattle-dealers from Liverpool and graziers from Ireland. The people of Liverpool and its neighbourhood get nine-tenths of the meat consumed by 500,000 people from Ireland, and therefore they had good cause to represent their own view of the matter to the Lord President of the Privy Council. It must also be remembered that the cattle market of the town of Liverpool was not under the regulations of the Town Council, and there was, therefore, no power for the town authorities to order the slaughter of diseased ani- mals. He thought that statistics should be obtained as to the damage done by foot-and-mouth disease ; and if it was found to be great, that an adequate remedy ought to be provided ; but whatever regulations were made ought to be compulsory on the local authorities. The Hon. Wilbeahaji Egerton reminded Mr. Torr that the action of the late Government in discontinuing the compulsory returns of attacks of foot-and-mouth disease had rendered it impossible to obtain statistics on the subject for the whole of Great Britain. However, he had no objection to withdraw the three paragraphs refer- ring to the report of the Select Committee. The remaining paragraphs were then voted uj)on seriatim. The first paragraph was carried by 8 votes to 6. The second paragraph was carried unanimously, subject to the following addition moved by Mr. W. E. Welby, M.P., and seconded by Col. Wilson : " And that these orders be made compulsory upon all local authorities." The third paragraph was also agreed to, subject to the addition of the same words. The question was then put that the communication as amended be sent to the Lord President of the Privy Council, and on a division was carried by 9 votes to 7, as follows : The Council of the Royal Agricultural Society are still of opinion that, in order to deal efficiently with the whole question of the contagious and infectious diseases of animals, there is urgent need of such recommendations as were made by them to the Right Hon. W. E. Forster, M.P., as Vice-President of the Privy Council, in December, 1873. Several of these recommendations would, however, require the sanction of Parliament to enable them to be put in force ; and, in view of the pressing necessity of dealing immediately with the renewed outbreak of foot- and-mouth disease, the Council beg to make to the Government the following recommendations : 1. That sec. 4 of the Animals (Amendment) Order of 1873 be revoked. 2. That the Orders relating to foot-and-mouth disease, enumerated in the first schedule of the Animals (Amendment) Order of 1873, be re-issued, and made compul- sory on all the local authorities. 3. That under the authority given in sec. 57 of the Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act, which makes the exposure or carriage of animals affected with & contagious or infectious disease an offence against the Act, the Privy Council should issue an order, compulsory on all the local authorities, to facilitate the discovery of disease (espe- cially foot-and-mouth disease) in lairs or other places adjacent to, or connected with, a market or fair, or where horses or animals are commonly placed before exposure for sale (these ^eing the wor^s of the Act), with a view to preventing the movement of animals to fairs and markets from such lairs and other places where disease exists, and to the adequate punish- ment of offenders against this section of the Act. Mr. Dent Dent withdrew the motion of which he had given notice with reference to farm prizes. Mr. Shuttleworth then moved the resolution of which he had given notice, and after a conversation it was amended, seconded by Lord Cathcart, and carried as follows : "That the last paragraph in the last Report of the Im- plement Committee be rescinded, and that a ring in the showyard be provided (under the direction of the stewards) for the exhibition of automatic implements worked by horse- power." Letters were read from the Earl of Powis and the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs communicating " Reports fur- nished to the Board of Admiralty and communicated to the Foreign Office in reference to newly-discovered guano deposits in Peru." The letter from the Foreign Office also requested that, considering the public interest exhibited upon this sub- ject, the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs should be informed whether the Council would wish to be furnished with a sample of the guano for the purpose of analysis. The Secretary was thereupon instructed to apply for samples of the guano from each of the deposits, and the whole subject was referred to the Journal Committee for further con- sideration. The Earl of Powis also communicated a copy of the Sup- plement to The South Pacific Times, dated April 14, 1874-, giving a report from Mr. Thierry, C.E., on these deposits, which lie to the south of Iquique, and one relating to the verification of that survey, by Mr. Hind'e, chief engineer of the department of Tarapaca. From these reports it appears that there exist the following workable guano deposits in thii region : Name. Chipana Huanillos Punta de Lobos... Pabellon de Pica Chanavaju Patache Patillos Total Estimated quantity. Cubic metres. 89,500 700,000 1,601,000 5,000,000 150,000 125,000 15,000 7,680,500 Mr. Thierry adds : " The guano dug from the various islands to the northward has always given the mean weight of one ton and a third per cubic metre; but after making some slight experiments, and remembering the dry state of the great deposits, 1 believe that prudence will not allow me to esti- mate tlie weight of the cubic metre at more than a ton. If we adopt then this number of cubic metres as that of tons, we find more than seven millions and a half of tons of guano in the different deposits already mentioned." Mr. Joseph Kindle observes on this point : " As regards the quantity of guano contained in this deposit, I think that Senor Thierry has calculated it as correctly as a slight survey would allow. In order to survey with some exactness months would be required, those of Huanillos and Punta Gorda, Lobos, Pabellon de Pica, from the difficulties they present, and with- out seeing it is impossible to judge, I think that until they are worked it will be impossible to determine the quantity they contain." A letter was read from M. Drouyn de Lhuys, President of the Societe des Agriculteurs de France, announcing that a deputation from that Society would officially visit the Bedford showyard ; and on the motion of Earl Cathcart the Secretary was instructed to send the members of the deputation cards of invitation, and otherwise to facilitate the object of their visit. An application from Mr. C. Sturgeon, to be allowed to exhibit Merino sheep at Bedford, not for competition for prizes, and unshorn, was granted on the motion of Mr. W Wells, seconded by the Earl of Powis. Letters were also read from Mr. J. V. Gooch, on th^ de THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 87 sltuctioa by insects of coffee trees in Natal ; and from Mr. E. A. Fawcett, in reference to the instructions to the stock judges for awarding prizes to breeding animals at the country meeting. A letter having been read from the secretaries of the Meteorological Society, requesting the Council to nominate delegates to serve on a committee to organise observations on a systematic basis with reference to the connection between meteorological agencies and the development of vegetable life, it was resolved, on the motion of Mr. W. Wells, seconded by Mr. W. J. Edmonds, that Mr. C. Wliiteliead be requested to act as one delegate, and to nominate and appoint his own colleague. A suggestion made by Mr. T. Willson at the annual meet- ing, " That the election of members of Council be by means of voting papers sent to members of the Society," was con- sidered, and the Secretary was instructed to inform Mr. Willson that the charter of the Society gave the privilege of electing members of Council to the annual meeting of mem- bers held on the 22nd of May, and that the Council had no power to deprive them of this privilege. THE HIGHLAND AND AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY OP SCOTLAND. At the monthly meeting of the dtrectors, Captain Tod in tlie chair, it was agreed, on the motion of Colonel Innes, of Learney, to propose to tlie general meeting to memorialise the Committee of the Privy Council on Educa- tion to establish science, as applied to agriculture, as one ol the subjects to be taught in primary schools. It was also resoWed that the Society shoulJ oiFer a premium for a text- book on the application of science to agriculture. On a report by the local committee, a silver medal was awarded to Messrs. Thomas Pirie and Co., Kiumundy, Long- side, Aberdeeusliire, for their patent heavy land cultivator, which was tried on tlie farm of Carsebonny, near Stirling, on the litli May. The report bears that " the implement is designed to cut the land in slices in order to secure the speedy and uniform breaking down of heavy soil, in such a way as to retain the moisture in it, to ensure a braird of turnips, fo i which crop it is specially intended ; and it seemed to tlie com- mittee to accomplish its purpose so satisfactorily that they recommend the award of a medal or certificate of merit. At the same time, they considered that, with three horses em- ployed, the work was slowly performed." A patent potato planting machine, made by Mr. William Dewar, Kellas, Dundee, and exhibited by Mr. Thomas Wigiit, Perth, was tried at the same time. The committee report that they thought this a most ingenious implement, and one which they believe may, without much difficulty, be made of great practical use ; but in its present state it did its work imperfectly, and they did not feel warranted in recommending the award of a prize or medal. THE CENTRAL CHAMBER OF AGRICULTURE. The last meeting of the Council of the Chamber of Agriculture prior to the summer and autumnal recess took place on Tuesday, June 2, in Salisbury. square, Mr. G. F. Muntz in the chair. Captain Craigie read the following report, which was received and adopted : Since the Local Taxation Committee presented tlieir last report, the cliief Pai-liameutary matter of interest to rate- payers has been the introduction and second reading of the Valuation of Property Bill. This measure deals, not as might be inferred from its somewhat incorrect title, with the valuation of property already assessable, but with the exten- sion of the rateable area to mmes, woods, and game. It thus redeems the pledge given by the Grovernment to bring these properties at once under liability to rates ; and in this re- spect necessarily resembles Mr. Stansfeld's Rating Bill of last session, although your Committee are glad to observe that it does not reproduce the objectionable features of that measure. While admitting, as they have over done, the imiDossibility of locally rating personal property, your Com- mittee wore last year compelled emphatically to condemn the attempt then made to convert thij present temporary concession into a perpetual exemption in favour of perso- nalty, unbalanced and unaccompanied by any compensation to the owners and occupiers of land and houses for the ex- ceptional burdens thus thrown upon them. No such attempt is made in the present bill, which is wisely confined to the extension of the area of rating to certain exempted classes of hereditaments, and in no way prejudges any of those larger and more important questions which are reserved for the careful consideration they demand. It embodies also rules for the guidance of Assessment Committees in dealing wiih the new subjects of rating, which are for the moso part founded on the jiractical amendments which, at the instance of your Committee, were substituted for the crude and im- practicable provisions of last year's measure as originally introduced. Your Committee are therefore of opinion that, although one or two further minor amendments may still be necessary to ensure its ready acceptance by ratepayers, a general approval of the bill may be anticipated. Chambers of Agriculture, which have alwaj's contended for the justice of the extension of the local area of assessment now proposed, will be glad to see a measure of reform, however modest, which effects one of the objects for which they have agitated for many years. Especially will they approve of a proposal which comes not only as a practical improvement of the detail of our existing ratal system, but which is at the same time accompanied by a distinct recognition of the real grievance under which ratepayers labour, and an earnest of relief from unfairly borne National charges. Your Com- mittee called attention in their last report to the charges on the rates for the purpose of registration. The second reading of the Registration of Births and Deaths Bill on the 14th ult. afforded the Chairman of your Committee occasion to object not only to any increase of expense, however small, whicb- that measure might entail, but generally to the practice of imposing upon I'atopayers a charge which, like that now in- curred for the payment of registrars, is subject to no loea 1 limitation or control, but is fixed and determined by a cen- tral authority and is incurred for an object essentially ami peculiarly national. Your Committee will continue to urge the removal of these fixed payments to the Exchequer on grounds not only of justice to the ratepayers, but as a means of facilitating the general reform of the existing sj-stem of registration. In the meantime, they are glad to report that the President of the Local Government Board has undertaken that the Chancellor of the Exchequer and not the ratepayers shall be called on to provide for the additional expenditure which the present bill may involve. The second reading of a BUI for discontinuing the election by Ballot of Municipal Auditors and Assessors, presented to your Committee an op- portunity of raising the general question of an improved and effective audit of local accounts. The Chairman of your Com- mittee, in objecting to the present measure, pointed out the real importance of the office of auditor, and showed how undesirable it was to remove the formality and publicity of an election to this post under the existing law. Ho showed the advantage to ratepayers of establishing a thorough and complete audit, urging an extension of the auditors' powers and the assurance of greater independence in these officers'. Your Committee are glad to note that the Home Secretary on the part of the Government re-echoed these sentiments and protested against dealing piecemeal with a question of such interest. The Chairman of your Committee has accord- ingly given notice of motion for a committee to inquire into the subject. Few administrative changes are more required than a thorough reform in tlus direction. An effective audit and a consistent and coiiplete system of account should nrove of great value to all local ratepayers, and will render practicable an accurate general statement of local receipts and expenditure such as it has long been the aim of your Committee to secure. The Chairman then read the report of the deputation to the Lord Presiaent of the Council, the Duke of Richmond, on the Contagious Diseases of Animals, in which the deputation expressed tlieir groat disappointment at the answer of the Lord President to the representations made to him, and moved " That the report be received." Mr. C. S. Read, M.P., in seconding the motion, adverting to a par of the report relating to the slaughter of cattle atfected with pleuro-pneumonia, said he wanted to know how 38 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. much longer the ratepayers of England were going to be vic- timised by the present injustice of the slaughtering of cattle in Great Britain when the practice did not extend to Ireland. They were told that if they wanted to f;et rid of a disease like hat every leak in the bank must be dammed up ; but there were the tidal floodgates open continuously in Ireland. It was not of the slightest use for those who lived in the Eastern Counties, which imported so many Irish cattle, to kill animals affected with pleuro -pneumonia in these respective localities unless the power of slaughter extended to Ireland, and he would add unless there were also carried out the recommenda- tions of the Committee of last year that the Orders respecting cattle disease should be applied universally throughout the kingdom ; that in order to ensure early discovery of outbreaks and to enlist the sympathy of stockowners for the local autho- rities, the amount of compensation should be extended to three-fourths instead of one-half the value of the animal ; and that the period of isolation in the case of cattle which had been herded with infected cattle should be extended to two months. The loss which was now being sustained in Norfolk was at the rate of £600,000 a year, and the half measures now adopted with regard to pleuro-pneumonia and other infectious diseases were perfectly useless. Such measures imposed vexatious restrictions on owners of stock, but there was not the remotest chance of their stamping out disease. Mr. BeN2 ^ A < H J, X o O H U . in o O ■* ^ o CO lo "*i ira CO c» OJ O r-J ■*' r-H o 2 -S ■"^ ^ Z til « "l! OS r-4 O ■* CO o ^ o * 2^r 00 ^3 CO oo CO t~ 1-H- o 1^ „ ■* C> id t-^ r-i o § f o^^ O 00 o Si o o >-) ^■■^'Z • lo o Q in o 00 OS ■* C< CD C< O t-^ 00 o o ^ _o u io J o 1 a «o 00 o o t-H ;25 'O . M o CO f^l ^O O C* lO OS -Tt o t^ oo t^ ira o< CO o H bo O •*■ O U3 oo' O o o %^ s to 00 o O -StS . 0? |^& .s O O CD 00 CO o ^^ CO oo CO CO oq o O ^ 8 ** 9 C- •* O •* oi O o o oo o «o ."^ BC es H s. O O .*d P=l s s o .fl £ w na -D s 'o (z^ ■<. O a ^ S '- a ►- !5 .5? u s S 2 "3 3 SCO J5 ^ ^ < OT eh a THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 45 It was not considered necessary to determine the sugar in all the roots ; but as the mangel is essentially a saccharine plant, I considered it an interesting point to ascertain the pro- portions of sugar existing in these roots. In the case of No. 2, yellow intermediate mangel, the percentage of sugar was very high, nearly 7"4. I think that some conclu- sions which might be turned to useful practical account are deducible from some of the results in the field and the labora- tory, stated in the foregoing tables. We learn from them, for instance, that no useful results, but rather the contrary, can be obtained by growing monster mangels or turnips. Since the introduction of green- crop husbandry into these countries, it appears to have ever been the farmer's ambition to exceed his neighbours in the production'of gigantic mangels and swedes. It has always been the practice, too, of writers in agricultural journals to encourage tlie growth of roots of abnormal dimensions. 1 have not a shadow of a doubt upon my mind but that this practice has been carried out to an extreme and mischievous extent. Mr. Baldwin of Glas- nevin, has forcibly pointed out the absurdity of awarding prizes to show roots merely because they are the largest. By "spoon-feeding" (as it has not inaptly been termed) a few roots it would be easy for a man with a few perches of a garden to produce more promising roots for show purposes than a farmer could who grew his 20 acres of roots in an ordinary, and I may add, a proper, manner. Let us see how far the results of Mr. Young's experiments and my own justify my statement that very large roots should not be grown. At Brockley Park Mr. Young sowed Mam- moth long red mangel in two plots. The mangels sown in one plot were not thinned out widely, but were allowed to grow rather closely together. In the other plot the mangels were supplied with a very large amount of manure, because the plot was the site of a former manure heap. The mangels here were thinned out widely, so as to allow room for the rapid and extensive development of the roots. The acreable yield of the mangels which had been moderately manured and kept close together amounted to 46 tons 15 cwts., whilst the mangels which had been abundantly manured and widely thinned out produced a crop of about 70 tons per acre. Now, if the large roots and the small ones were equally nutritious, it would, of course, be desirable to grow the former, but when we compare the composition of tlie maugels of plot 1 (thickly sown) with those of plot 10 (thinly sown), we find an absolute and impor- tant difference iu favour of the former. The thickly-sown roots contain 15'7 per cent, of solid, or nutritive matter, which, the acreable yield of the crop being 46 tons 15 cwts., would amount to 19,782 pounds weight of dry food per acre. The thinly sown roots contained only 7.47 percent, of solid or dry matter: aud as the acreable return from these large roots was 70 tons, tliat would yield only 11,681.6 pounds weight of dry food per acre. In producing the large roots, the farmer would incur more expense than if he cultivated the small ones ; for instance, he would have to apply more manure, and his cartage would be far greater. If Mr. Young grew ten acres of mangels like No. 10, he would have to cart 700 tons from the field to the stores, and yet he would have in this crop only as much solid food as would be contained in about 450 tons of the smaller mangels. No. 1. This year I hope to be able to make in conjunction with Mr. Young, some additional experiments in reference to the influence of cultivation on the composition of the mangel. IXWORTH FARMERS' CLUB. LABOUR-SAVING MACHINERY. At the last meeting, to hear a paper by Mr. Castledine, agent for Messrs. Eansomes, Sims, and Head, on Labour- saving Machinery, Mr. P. Huddlestone was in the chair. Mr. Castledine read the following paper : The present agitation going on in the country has already resulted in such a vast amount of correspondence, on all sides, that it will be needless for me to dwell upon a subject, which at this period is occupying the attention of agriculturists throughout the country, as well as dignified heads from Manchester, and real home-grown Londoners, whose sole knowledge of agriculture consists in growing about two dozen scarlet runners round the back wall, two boxes of mignionette, three rusty looking geraniums, and occasionally supplemented with a window fernery. But we will leave the Londoners to enjoy their little bit of green, and strongly recommend the people from all large towns to come and get a peep at the country as often as possible. And in the meantime, we will try to do everything in our power to improve the appearance of the crops, and bring to bear as much as possible our knowledge for their benefit, as well as our own, by endeavouring with the help of an all wise Creator to improve the blessings bestowed upon us, so that good beef and mutton can be sent to their large towns ; also good wheat for their bread, which will prove to them in the best manner that we are of some use to them. It is well known that to be behind with your work at the important time of harvest, is most disastrous to all, and in many in- stances would as much effect the consumer as the producer, and would also indirectly effect all kinds of trade. In years gone by, we frequently read of large crops of all kinds being completely spoiled by wet weather, and a variety of otiier causes. Now everyone can, by the uses of improved ma- chinery and other appliances, which facilitate the ingathering of the crops, be to a great extent provided against either a wet season, or a very forward harvest. The ingathering of corn can now be effected in a way that our forefathers never dreamt of, and which, had they been told would one day be accomplished, would have made them think that all the rising generation, to use the present popular phrase, had really gone mad. Perhaps the best way to illustrate the present remarks would be to refer to a very wet season that was worked upon the old plan, before the harvester, or any other machines for that purpose had heeii introduced. I refer tp the harvest of the year 1801, which though an extreme case, was aggravated by the war then going on against the First Napoleon. That year was not only a late one, but owing to the continued wet, there not one field of wheat gathered in good condition, and the greater part was so much sprouted that it was impossible to get any sound flour from it. But few farmers are now living who went through that awful period, and fewer still of the labourers who suffered much in health through eating the un- wholesome food, as well as nearly all being thrown on tlie parish for supplemantary relief to support their families. The farmers were also very much reduced by a series of wet har- vests, between 1795 and 1801, which was the climax, and were unable to pay the labourer enough to exist upon, so ranch so that an Act was passed that entitled the labourer to an allowance of 2s. 6d. per week for each child to aid him in supporting his family. Happily we are now in a position to be able to cope with most seasons, and instead of the harvests extending over such a lengthened period, in most cases it is got through in less than half the time formerly occupied. What with reapers and mowers for cutting corn, hay, and stover crops (which are r.ll laid by them in light and convenieni form both for drying and collecting), with haymakers for speedily drying the hay, and rakes for collecting and the elevators and stackers to do all the drudgery that was formerly done by the labourer, it makes the harvest time for iiim much easier, and places the farmer in a position to take every advantage of the season. I will now call your attention to a few of the special advantages and improvements in the various machines. Nothing, I think, is more conducive to preserving a good crop of hay than to cut it down quickly when ready, and to gather it in as speedily as possible, consistent with sufficient time for drying, so as to preserve as much as possible the green fresh- ness and beautiful aroma that is retained if well gathered. The plan of mowing or cutting with a machine is infinitely superior to the old plan of cutting with a scythe, enabling you to cut down one acre per hour as against three-quarters-of-an acre iu a day with a scythe, thus showing from ten to twelve times as much cut down ; and not only does it cut more expedi- tiously, but you are also able to cut closer to the ground and get that portion wherein lays sU the weight, and which very much increase the tonnage per acre. It also dries quicker when cut with a machine from being left mgre evenly distributed 46 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. over the ground than with the scythe, and left better for tha haymaker. I will now notice the reaper. You will find it is not nearly so new an implement as a great many people imagine, as a machine was used in a very rough way for about 400 years, but after which was in a great measure lost sight of. After this we only find records of the sickle. I do not intend noticing the hundreds of patents that were taken out for reaper and mowers, but shall trace the principal ones, with the various improvements that were made from time to time. The first reaper we have notice of, a sketch of which is now before yon, was made in the period of Romau greatness : tliey iiad a notion that grain should be cut down more expeditiously than with a sickle, but never assumed a very satisfactory form to induce the agriculturist to adopt them. Of tlie structure of such abortive attempts as a reaping machine, little has come down to us, and that little very vague and unsatisfactory. 1 find in looking over some old records, Pliny, an old Human author, born A.D. 23, in his Natural History, writes as touching the matter of cutting down and reaping corn, there are divers and sundry devices. He goes on to say, " In France, where the fields are large, they use a jade into the tail of a mighty wheelbarrow or cart, made after the fashion of a van, and the same set with knives and trenchant teeth, sticking out on both sides — otherwise stakes or palisades, on wheels. Now the same is driven forward before two beasts, on two wheels, into the standing ripe corn, contrary to the manner of other carts that are drawn after them ; the said teeth and sharp knives, fastened to the side of tlie wheelbarrow or car, catch hold of the corn ears and cut tliera off yet so that they fall presently into the body of the wheelbarrow." It appears that the straw was then not much valued ; it was cut afterwards if any was wanted. Palladius, an Eastern prelate, who was born A.D. 891, gives a very similar account of this machine, and says its nse was probably continued for centuries. Reapers of the fore- going description appear to have baen in use for .about 400 years, after this the cutting was pffnCipally doiic by the la- bourers, witli a sickle, a sketch of which is now before you. The earliest proposal for a meclianical reaping machine in Britain, appears to be that described by the Annals of Agricul- ture, collected by Arthur Young, and published in the year 1785. Capel Lofft, Esq., Troston, on August 17th, 1785, called the attentian of the Society of Arts to the nachine described by Pliny and Palladius, and sent translations of both authors to the Society, at the same time asking them whether a machine made in tliis way would not be eligible for the prize of £30, which the Society of Arts then offered. When sending these trauslations to the Society, this gentleman also describes the locality in which he lived. He says : " Troston consists of 28 houses, but we have resident here neither butcher, baker, nor barber, divine, surgeon, or apothecary, nor till I imported that evil, a lawyer." On the 4th July, 1799, the first patent for a reaping machiue was obtained by Joseph Boyce, of Pine Apple Cottage, Mary-le-13one, and in the following year another patent was granted to Robert Mears, Erorae. In 1814 there is a notice of a reaper invented by Mr. Dobbs, dramatist at the Birmingham Theatre ; and having got through with it too late for tlie season, he introduces it to the public in a very peculiar manner. He advertises ou his play-bills that part of the stage will be planted with wheat, S:c., that the machine has cut and gathered where it grew, and that the machine will be worked exactly as in the field. He goes on to say that " On Eriday next, October 14th, will be presented the cele- brated comedy of A Bold Stroke for a Husband,' and at the end of the play Mr. Dobbs will exhibit two machines, of differ- ent powers and purposes, for cutting down corn, sugar cane. Sic. ; to conclude with the celebrated farce of ' Eortuue's Erolic,' the part of Robin Rouglihead by Mr. Dobbs, in which he will work the machine in character, in an artificial field of wheat, planted as near as possible to the manner in which it grew." In 1822 Mr. Henry Ogle, of Rennington, near Alnwick, invented a machine for reaping corn, to which, in the same year, an apparatus for collecting the corn into sheaves was added by Messers. Thomas and Joseph Brown, of Alnwick. This appears to be the first reaper constructed to lay the corn in sheaves. Messrs. Brown then advertised they had machines ready for use for cutting and sheaving corn, but not one person could be found to purchase. After this some working people threatened to kill Mr. Brown if lie persevered any further, so that he was obliged to give it up, although he proved to several of the farmers the machine would cut a large quantity in a day. The machiiie invented by the Rev. Patrick BeU was onethat made a great stir, and in 1828 this machine was publicly worked and was admired by all who saw it. After this there was not much improvement in the machines till the Exhibition of 1851 from whence sprung our present modern machines. I will now pass on to notice the benefits arising from the use of these modern machines. It is not generally knewn that the self-raker will cut the stover crops, but this they will do well, if properly set. The average cost of a reaper made by any of the large houses is from £30 to £35, and it may be estimated to last at least seven years, which makes the cost, say £5 per year. The cost of knives, wear and tear, and repairs, may also be estimated at from £3 to £5 per annum, making the annual cost of the reapers from £8 to £10. The ordinary two-horse machine will cut about au acre per hour, and in the long harvest days, from five in the inorniug till seven to eight in the evening, making 14 to 15 hours per day, working the whole time without stoppages, will cut down fifteen acres. I have taken the result as working without any stoppages, as it is customary to have a change of horses, each pair working for two or three hours at a time, and changing the men during the meal times. In a harvest lasting a mouth there would be 24 such days, making 360 acres as the work of a machine during one harvest. These 300 acres done at a cost for the machine of from £8 to £10, or from 160 to 200 shillings, if worked out will average from 5^d. to 6|d., or, say, all round sixpence per acre. The price of cutting by hand varies considerably, but I should think would average about 9s. or 10s. per acre. By the use of the machine many farmers are able to let out their harvest at a reduction of, say 2s. 6d. per acre, still leaving it possible for the men to earn, during the time they are at work, as much money or more than when doing the whole of it by hand. This, however, is not the greatest advantage, for farmers have been willing to give their men the use of . the machine in order to faciliate the harvest work and enable them to take advantage of the fine weather or the early markets, which, on an average crop of eight coomb per acre, would only cost about -Jd. to a Id. per coomb, which would be more than compensated for by getting the corn up in good condition, and being able to take advantage of the markets. It is also a further advantage to get the harvest over as speedily as possible, as the land can tlien be ploughed up during the fine dry weather, and exposed to the action of the sun, and the weeds thereby be more effectually killed. It may be said that I have not taken into account the cost of the horses, but at this time of the year, when there is not much other work, there is generally a good supply of horses on the farm which would otherwise be standing idle if not employed on the reaping machine. It should also be born in mind that the men who would otherwise be employed iu cutting the corn, can, when the reaper is used be employed in collecting and carting, or it would enable the farmer with a scarcity of hands to get through his work in the same time as another farmer who had plenty of labour. I shall not pretend at this time to say anything as to the respective merits of the various descriptions of reapers made by the well-known makers in this country. There are two clashes of machines, viz., those which simply cut the corn, and the self-rakers, which cut and deliver the corn. As I have shown the cost of a reaper, also the average cost for repairs, and the probable quantity that can be cut down per day, it will be for you, who are better ac- quainted with the paying part of a farm, to discuss the utility and general saving effected by the use of a reaper. The first introduction of the drag rake dates far back for a very long period, and was as near like the present swathe rake as possible. It was afterwards improved by making the drag rake raucli longer, and putting on a wheel at each end. It was very light and convenient to handle, so that girls of from 14 to 16 years of age could readily use it. The next improvement was made by Wedlake, who made the rake to balance by two heavy balls projecting in front of it. This rake was highly commended at Cambridge R.A.S.E. After this another great improvement was made in rakes by J. C. Grant, of Stamford, who took the prize at the R.A.S.E., Liverpool. This was the first rake made so that the whole row of teeth could be lifted at once, and just as quickly re- sume their proper position. Since this time there have been various improvements in the construction and detail of horse rakes, some of which are constructed for the man to walk behind, others for him to sit on the rake and deliver the load by a lever, and others wliich are, so to speak, self-acting. If no very large quantity has to be raked, delivery by hand is perhaps sufficient; but for going over a large quantity of THE FAEMEE'S MAGAZINE. 47 ground in a short time, it is important that the driver should ride, as he will then not hesitate to allow the horse to walk at its fair pace. If the leverage is sufficiently light, I prefer a rake of this description to the self-acting rakes, which must necessarily be more expensive and more liable to get out of order. A rake also should be so constructed that the teeth can be set just to skim the ground, so as not to gather any dirt with the load, and also that when required the teeth can be set hard on the ground, for the purposes of raking twitch or rubbish, or for collecting hay on a hard bottom. Sup- posing you have three full sets of waggons or carts, it takes nine men to clear and rake after them ; whereas one good horse rake does equally well, or it will even save twelve hands if a good quick-walking nag horse is used, and a seat for the driver is fixed on the rake. Haymakers are so well known, and their uses so well appreciated, that it is almost needless to say mucii about them. The main feature is to secure one that will not knock out the seed from the hay and stover crops, and to liave one that will leave the crops light and in a convenient form, so that the weather may have full effect. Some persons prefer those haymakers which have a forward action, for scattering the hay, and they are especially needed when the grass is cut by hand ; but when the hay- maker is used in conjunction with a mowing machine, the backward action is generally sufficient ; and as the hay is I^jHfeocked about, the seeds and small particles are not bo likely to be broken off and wasted. But, whether one kind of machine be used or the other, there can be no doubt that hay can be made in a very mucii shorter time with a haymaker than it tan be by hand. It is much more regularly tlirown about the field, and will consequently make in less time, and will therefore be of more uniform quality and of greater value. Also advantage can be taken of a few hours' sunshine, which in ftie old way of making hay by hand would be inevitably lost ; and it can be quickly put into windrows by the American gatherer. A great point in the haymaker, as in all these season implements, is that it should be so constructed as not to be liable to break down in the middle of the haysell ; and it would be the worst economy to buy a cheap machine of this character, when so much depends upon its thorough effi- ciency. Topplers, or American gatherers, are extremely good things where a quantity is wanted to be got in quickly ; and too much cannot be said in their favour. As much as twenty acres can be got with them in a day. The old-pat-tern ele- vator, as used with the thrashing machine, is modernised and used in the harvest field for stacking hay, stover, corn, &c. ; and it is only very recently that tiiis machine has come into use ; and at the Hull R.A.S.E. show, in 1873, the Judges report upon them, and say, " While speaking of the elevators, we should not omit to notice a very excellent one, brought out by Stephen Lewin, of Poole. This is a very simple implement, compact and light of draught, and woiks smoothly, closes up for travelling, and can Ije opened out and put to work by one man, in three or four minutes. It can be used for all kinds of crops, and can be worked by a pony, and deliver to a height of twenty-five feet or more." From my own experience, I have found that this machine does not swerve in the work like many others, and has also a very good arrangement for lengthening or shortening the chains. These same stackers or elevators are so arranged that they are as well adapted for the thrashing machine as far harvest work. 1 have made inquiries, and am told these elevators will take the corn away from the carts as fast as four men could pitch it on to the stack ; and two men, who have understood the working of the machines, have tried to block it, and could not do so. The cost of a stacking machine or elevator is about £58, including the gear and all necessary fittings for working same, and the cost of repairs is comparatively trifling-. The main thing would be to keep it well cleaned, well oiled in all parts, and from time to time a good coat of paint. In fact this applies to every machine, as well as elevators. How frequently you will find the machine standing for months, just on the same spot where it was used, without baring been cleaned after use, or without any protec- tion from the weather ! It is also very essential that the best kind of oil should be used ; a great mistake is made is buying cheap rubbish that is sold as machine oil — good oil with economic feeding cans is much cheaper to use than an un- limited supply of common oil. A little oil that in a machine kept clean can really get lo the bearings, is much better than a deluge of oil poured on without reason on to a bearing covered with dust and dirt. 1 mention this as upon the proper management of oiling and cleaning in a great measure regu- lates the length of time a machine will last. I have now spoken of the machines, &c., used generally through the hay and corn harvest, and must leave the matter in your hands for discussion. I think I have said enough to show that the intro- duction and use of good machinery is of advantage to the agriculturist, in enabling him to deal with his work and his crops expeditiously, economically, and effectually. That it is of advantage to the manufacturer you will all readily believe ; but not only to these two classes is it of service, but also to the labourer himself, in relieving him of the heaviest and severest of the work on the farm. In fact, in the present day where should we all be without it. The work could not be got through, and there would necessarily follow a scarcity of provisions, which would be disastrous to all. Mr. FisoN thought Mr. C^astledine had rather miscalculated the duration of the reaping machines. He had had his in use for six or seven years, and had it not been for his determina tion to have it overhauled, a year since, it would have been no expense whatever. He had gone to the expense of having the bolts and small castings in duplicate. With the exception ot that expense, he did not think his reaper liad cost £1 a year. As he had said, he had had his for sevenjyears, and he believed that it would last another seven years, and at the end of that time it would be as good as ever. He had repeatedly cut eighteen acres a day with his. He did not, however, agree with Mr. Castledine about working the horses in harvest. If tliey had nothing to do then, that was the very time that they were best resting, ready lor the hard work ol the autumn tillage. He thought one great evil of the reaping machines was that they kept the horses too much at hara work in harvest, so that they were mauled out, by the fourteen hours a day that Mr. Castledine spoke of. Mr. Peto remarked that there was a time when h thought farmers were a little too hasty about the intro- duction of machinery, but at that time labour was plentiful, and strouj^ able-bodied men were willing to do justice to their employers. Unfortunately, however, witlua the last lew years, there had been a sort of retrograde movement in the matter of labour, and consequently it behoved farmers to see how far tlic introduction of machinery would enable them to tide over • the present difficulties. He spoke of having worked one of Wood's mowers with great success. With one of these machines he cut a whole field, and he did not have a man on the field until he carted the hay. He expressed his belief the haymaker really improved the hay, and said if there was not a very heavy crop that there was no necessity for shaking it out ; if it was left in that state, and horse-raked the contrary way, that would be suflicient. He was quite of opinion that with the assistance of machinery it would not be necessary to have many men in the field, and lie began to think the same with regard to the harvest field. He believed they would be able to get in their crops with much less trouble and expense than they did at the present time. He had not been so successful with reapers as some of his friends ; he, however, had worked one of Hornsby's with suc- cess, and he did not doubt but that other machines were equally as good. Mr. Gayford, juu., said he agreed with Mr. Fisou as to wear entailed by the reaping machine. In harvest the wheat carting itself was enough for the hones when the farmer was fortunate enough to get a crop. The reapers were costly to the farmers at first, and very expensive to repair. He did not think that the reaper Jeft tlie wheat or the barley so well for tying as the scythe did. The elevator which he found best was easiest to move and least trouble to fix. He did not see the necessity for its doubling up, as it might generally be placed in the barn when done with. As to the question of cost, he hoped Mr. Castledine was right in his calculations, but he could not agree with him as to not cliarging lor iiorse power ; it was really an objection to the use of machines. If he could make sure of labour lie would rather iiave his corn cut by hand, but in order to meet a scarcity of labour he was glad, and they all were glad, of machines. He did not think they would have any difficulty, for at the prices now paid they would attract labour from the towns. He had heard of an elevator to take the corn quite from the swathe. He only wished they might invent a machine to elevate a little more money into the farmers' pockets. Mr. Manfielu would strongly urge upon all farmers to use 43 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. machines for cultii'g grass, but he thought the saving was not so great iti cutting corn. He looked upon reaping machines as necessary evils, for he did not like them. Last year he went to the expense of putting two reaping machines into order, and then did not use tliera, but cut his corn by manual labour. There was no machine which took so much out of the horses as the reaping machine did ; nor could he see the great saving of manual labour in cutting corn ; but in cutting grass there was a great saving. la corn cutting lie found that be wanted nearly as many men for tying as they did to cut the corn by hand. He did not anticipate a scarcity of labour. They never bad more harvest men oifered to tliera than last year, and be expected to see the same again this year. They would find people coming from Bury and Thet- ford offering their services. Mr. Castledine had spoken of liand-rakes being used by girls. Nothing must be said about that in the present day. Mr. Castledinz : Tliat was in 1801. Mr. Manfielu said he did not see how reaping machines could be used so many days as Mr. Castledine spoke of, and lie could not agree even with Mr. Peto as to the expense. As to the use of elevators, lie could not see the saving as tbey deli- vered the corn at one side, and there must be men to remove the com to any part of the stack they needed. Mr. I'lsojc said he found that there were less men em- ployed. As to the use of the toppler for barley, be found that they toppled out too much corn. He thought the toppler a most dangerous machine. He liad injured a valuable horse by one, aud lost the use of it for six months. He thought the cost of reapers was much increased by neglect. He had his taken to pieces and cleaned every year as soon as the work was done. He usually cut 140 acres with his machine. Mr. Gatfokd, in reference to the topplers, agreed with Mr. rison, that he could not use them with such cr»ps as bis ; there would be no where to topple it to. He believed the toppler bad a very great advantage on their light lands. In some seasons, such as 18G5 and 1870, he found it a great advantage in getting tlie barley together. He also thought he must defend the elevator against what Mr. Manfield had said. Mr. Fisox said that the great fault of the elevator was its unwieldly form. There was no building on a farm to receive it ; it was like putting a six foot man into a four foot bed. Mr. Booty said he had but little experience of the reaper, but he had found great benefit from it, especially in cutting liis sanf'oin and clover. He found great difficulty with his men, who put every obstacle in the way. If men could be found willing to work it, the reapers would be of the greatest advantage, tie cut his wheat, 50 acres, and 30 acres of clover and sanfoin at an expense of 2s. 6d. an acre. Mr. Mallows spoke in favour of the elevators, and said be was sure that anyone who used them would not try to do with- out them. He also said he had used the reaper M'ith great adrantage, and he should be sorry to be without either a reaper or an elevator. Mr. T. Goldsmith said he was in the habit of allowing his men the use of bis reaping machine witliout charging them. Where the corn was laid liis men preferred the scythe, but taken as a whole, for expedition and for other reason, he thought the reapers were advantageous to farmers. He was an advocate for the introduction of machinery, though he had no fear that there would be any scarcity of labour. Mr. Feto said tlie introduction of reapers were very expen- sive, and where farmers did introduce them at all, be did no'' see why they should not make them pay for themselves- Hitherto tbey bad been a little too lenient with their men. If machinery was introduced, some charge had to be made for it. Mr. Garkakd was much pleased with the reaper. He charged his men 3s. per acre, and deducted it from tlieir wages, and not only did be make 3s. per acre by his machine, but he cut some for bis neighbours, for which be charged them, thus earning something with bis reaper. Mr. Burt said he had a combined machine for mowing and reaping, which did its work admirably ; it would cut grasses beautifully, and was of extremely light draught. It was rather an expensive machine, but it did its work remarkably well. Mr. F. Gayforu did not like cutting barley with a reaper ; bu^. in cutting wheat and stover, and especielly stover, it did its work remarkably well. In the present day farmers would not be able to do without machinery ; but it was very expen- sive to the farmer, taking it altogether, because at present tliey did not pay their men less on account of the introduction of machinery. He pointed out that the horses deteriorated greatly during the harvest from the severe character of the work on small farms, though it lasted but a short time. Mr. Manfield said be did not use the reaper because he found the other plan cheaper, but he was greatly in favour of the use of that machine for hay, stover, and beans. The Chairman pointed out that the machinery which had been used up to the present was, unfortunately, like law books, tiiere was always a nev edition coming out. That was a very w'ood thing for the machinists, but it was uncommonly bad for the farmer. He did not, however, wish to be misunderstood. He thought that all the improvements in agriculture of late years had come from the power which the machines had given to them. As to the labour question, he thought the farmers were wrong in the firNt instance. The farmers ought to have fought the que^tioll some little time ago. They fought the question in bis parish (Norton) last year. The labourers there demanded a rise and the farmers would not give it. He for one had made up bis mind for years that if a man came to hira and laid his case before him, as between man and man, he would listen to him, and he would do whatever was right ; but if his men came to him aud told hira that they must have a certain sum, without any argument about it, then he for one would not submit to it. He would never be browbeaten by any set of men, aud he did not care who they were. He respected the labourer as much as anybody, but he would not be set at defiance by any body of men. They had heard a great deal of Unions ; they had been productive of much mischief, and he would urge upon all farmers to resist its introduction into their midst. He spoke of the object the Farmers' Defence Association had in view, and he urged farmers to join it and to stand shoulder to shoulder in their own defence. As to there being a deficiency of labour, he looked upon it as perfect non- sense. If farmers united, he believed they would be able to make the labourers disbelieve the nonsense which was written in certain papers ; for instance, that the landlord and the farmer could be kicked over the hedge, and the labourer could have all the land. Mr. Castledine : I saw it in the Labourers' Union Chronicle. The Chairman urged that farmers should treat the labourer kindly in case he should retarn, for after all he was led away by other people. Several other members warmly recommended a lock-out, and maintaining it amongst farmers. Mr. Castledine, in reply, recommended the use of the reaper in the sale of which he was interested. THE OUTBREAK OF FODT-AND-MOUTII DISEASE IN CHESHIRE.— At the monthly meeting of the North Cheshire Chamber of Agriculture, held at Macclesfield — Mr. Carswell (Adlington) in the chair, the recent outbreak and prevalence of foot and-mouth-disease in the county was discussed. The Chairman gave it as his opinion that Cheshire had suff'ered more from foot and mouth disease in the past than from any other disease, not even excepting the cattle plague. The stock deteriorated in value by the disease, and altogether the loss was incalculable. Mr. Whitley (Birtles) moved, and Mr. Cooke (Adlington) seconded a motion that the Chamber memorialise the Lords of the Privy Council, praying them to re-enforce the restrictions recently rescinded as to the movement of cattfe affected with disease, in order that no cattle suffering from the disease may be brought to fairs or markets, or carted any distance after death. The Chamber also considered the Valuation of Property Bill, now before Parliament, and rtsolved " That this Chamber is of opinion that the 6th clause of the bill is unworkable, and recommends that the game on each estate should be valued and assessed in ons sum>" THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 49 LANCASHIRE FARMER S' CLUB. At tlie annual merting ia Liverpool, Mr. G. C. Hale, Knowsley, in tlie chair, Mr. H. Neild, of Worsley, in moving the adoption of the report, and referring to the union question, said that he did not at all fear tlie spread of what was called trades' unionism amongst their lahourers. The farm lahourers of Lancashire, he helieved, were superior to any, and he should like very much to see them represented in the council. Mr. IliGBY, the Secretary, read a paper on " Lancashire Farming : Its Favourahie and Adverse Aspects." lie said : Allow me to premise that my own knowledge of Lancashire farming is almost wholly confined to the southern part of the county. Of that part of it which lies north of Preston I have only caught glimpses from the railway in travelling to Black- pool or towards Carlisle ; but I had the advantage of being inspector of farms for the Manchester and Liverpool Agricultural Society for tiiree years in conjunction with the late Mr. Rothwell, who was well known to most of us, and jiighly respected for his extensive agricultural knowledge and sound judgment ; and from him and other gentlemen of repute and intelligence I have gathered such facts as would lead me to say that while there is a great diversity of soil and climate and cultivation in Lancashire, and while a large portion of the county is practically unsuitable for farming in its natural character, yet there will be found as good and successful management as in any other county, and a larger proportion to its area capable of arable cultivation than in most other counties in the kingdom. The Lancashire farmer, as a rule, is a hard-working and industrious man, often working himself and his children as hard as his own labourers, and cherishing great pride in his crops and in his cattle and horses. He avails liiraself largely now of the use of machinary in cultivation, with the best results, and a farmer is considered a sluggard and almost a disgrace to his class whose crops are overrun with weeds and who has recourse to a bare summer fallow to keep his land clean. Tlie farms of Lancashire vary much in extent, but as a rule the holdings are small. The average size, as given in the agricultural returns collected last year,is33 acres, which I notice, is less than that of any other county in Euglandor Wales. Of tlie 7i3,000 acres in tlie county from wliich returns were received, 103,000 in round numbers were in corn crops, and 510,000 in green crop and grass for pasture and hay. The live stock returned was 32,000 horses, 238,000 cattle, 318,000 sheep, and 39,000 pigs ; and tlie total number of garden allot- ments detached from cottages or o'her houses were 993, averaging a tenth part of an acre eacli. Having made these general statements, I proceed to speak more particularly of the advantages and disadvantages that affect the farming of the county. One principal advantage of a Lancashire farmer is that he is near to good markets for the sale of his produce. Another fact favourable to Lancashire farming is its easy access to town-made manure as a fertiliser. Large breadths of what is now very profitable laud would be poor and unproductive if it were not for liberal and constant applications of manure from cowhouses and stables in town, used in conjunction with that made upon the larm, and for which no belter or even equal substitute is found. 1 have a high opinion of the value of ground bones as a top-dressing to pasture land, and of guano and nitrate of soda as a stimulant, particularly to plants in the early stages of their growth ; but for staying power, for feeding crops to their maturity, and for developing them in perfection, as well as improving the soil, there is nothing to be compared to the manure I have referred to. For getting good crops and keeping land in good heart, applied plentifully and judiciously, it will almost work miracles upon land ; and it has the negative advantage that, however applied, it never does harm. I am almost afraid to state the value of the crops I have seen grow- ing on farms within a few miles of Liverpool, on land naturally poor and of a hungry character, for fear of losing credit for Teiacity ; and this is accomplished principally through liberal application of manure, aided, no doubt, by good cultivation, and to some extent also by a fine climate. But I do not hesitate to say that in the farming within three or four miles of the Mersey, from llalewood to Crossley, and in adjacent parts, there is as much valuable produce raised from t he land annually as in any part of England, and that it would be impossible to do so well if it were not for the manure made in Liverpool and carted out from that town, and the same advantage applies to the farming around all our large towns from the same conditions. Lanca- shire farming is also favoured, I think, by its proximity to the stimulative influences of extensive commercial pursuits. The life and growth of commerce is dependent upon enterprise, and it is always most successful where there is most competition, and when to the rules of prudence is added the push and energy of effort to excel, and to go further than has before been attain- ed. And as example of this kind stimulates the same action in others similary engaged, it may be fairly assumed that the Lancashire farmer comes within its influence when disposing of his produce to the merchant princes of Manchester and Liverpool and other large towns. But I shall be reminded that it is presuming too mucli upon the good nature of farmers to expect this general progress in farming under the present system of land tenure. To produce such results there must be a large antecedent outlay in very many eases, and always a liberal expenditure in manures and in deep cultivation, the profitable return of which cannot be realised annually ; and I grant the propriety of the qualification. Taken as a whole, the occupation of land generally is in an unsatisfactory state, and requires revision. The conditions under which it is held are not so liberal even as in feudal times, when it was given to the baron's retainers as their wages for suit and service, and a portion of its produce as an acknowledgment iu the shape of rent, for then it descended from father to soa for generations, and such a thing as disturbance or notice to quit was unknown, except in cases of treachery to the baron, or of criminal delinquency to the law. There is much of the same kind of feehng still existent on some large estates. Our noble president has many families among his tenants who have succeeded deceased relatives, and who can trace back their ancestry for several generations as tenants of the same farm, and the same things exists on other estates in the county, to the credit of owner and occupier alike. On those estates there exists mutual confidence between landlord and tenant, and confidence which has been rarely abused by either party ; but it is far from being the rule. The law in respect of tenancies is more favourable to the landlord than the tenant generally. Let any unprejudiced man read nearly any old farm agreement, and say if he does not think the tenant is treated either as an ignoramus who does not know liis business, or as a suspicious character who must be kept in honesty's path by rule and line. This state of things is, I tliink, adverse to farming generally and to Lancashire farming iu particular. Another thing adverse to Lancashire farming is the heavy burden of taxation which the sanitary condition of adjacent towns renders necessary in order to make them healthy places of habitation. Where population clusters together there must be an adequate supply of water, an efficient system of sewerage, and certain other out- lay to provide for the health and comfort of the inhabitants ; and when to this is added the cost of highways, maintenance of poor, and all the other charges that are collected under the head of Poor-rate, the local taxation of large portions of Lancashire farming becomes a heavy burden. Almost every advantage in life has some drawback. Our population gives us a good and near market for our produce, but it also adds to our taxes. The most serious part of the case, however, is that we are assessed upon the annual value of our holdings, which is relatively much higher tlian any other kind of business premises in proportion to income made from them. The Income- tax Commissioners are contented to take our income at half our rentals, but the proportion of income to rental in most other occupations is double, treble, ten times, or even seventy times the amount of rental. What we complain of, therefore, is the unequal incidence of local taxation, and that wc as farmers, confessedly least able, are made to contribute the greatest share • and we feel it the more deeply that tlie cost of these works is continually increasing, and because the means for carrying out other objects of national utility are being levied iu the same way. The testimony of many farmers present will confirm me in the remark that rates have doubled and trebled during the last five years, and that they are now iu many places a very serious addition to the rentals of farms. Labour is another serious item of increase to cost of raising 60 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. produce in Lancasliire. Oar proximity to large manufactories and to busy to«'us is a disadvantage to us again here. Being able to make greater profits, the manufacturers can give liiglicr wages, moreover lie aust do so to draw men away from the fresli air and healthy residence of the country, and to retain tiien; farmers are compelled to give nearly equal wages. Wo have no delicacy in speaking of this matter, as we have no dif- ficulty in Lancashire, or in any adjoining county,l;ke that exist- ing in the southern and eastern counties. We honestly believe our men deserve all they get, and that they will always get as much as they deserve, without combining in union to enforce it, from the action of the inevitable law of supply and demand. Labour must always command high value in Lancashire, and we accept the fact without further comment, except this, that landlords could materially assist their tenants by providing cottages on their estates and letting them with, their farms for the residence of labourers employed thereon. Much is done in this way, although some of the cottages are poor and incon- venient, but the worst of them I would just say in passing are better than the cellar residences and thickly peopled houses in courts and alleys in large towns — a fact which some well- intentioned people overlook when moralising upon onr cottage accommodation to its disadvantage; but there is more wanted doing, and the building of more cottages would be an induce- ment to men to remain iu the country and do farmwork, in- btead of migrating to the towns. The erection and working of copper and alkali works, although confined to a part of the county, h.ave become so injurious to vegetation around ihem as to be a perceptible disadvantage to a large part of tlie farming of Lancashire. This subject has been so lately brought before the Chamber that I shall not require to do more than enume- rate its existence as one of its adverse aspects. The last adverse aspect of Lancashire farming that I shall name is one whoso correction lies largely in the hands of Lancashire farmers themselves. I know not if I shall have their sympathy, how- ever, in naming it, but I beg them to believe my remarks are made in no captious or censorious spirit, but from an honest desire to point out and to correct what I think is a serious disadvantage. I allude to the imperfect or unsuitable education which, as a rule, they give to their sons. It may be thought a matter of necessity to draw a boy from school at ll years of age, arid place him from that time among the workmen of the farm in order to keep down expenses, but as largely done it cannot be the best ^vay to make a farmer of him. A boy rarely begins to feel any interest in study until he is 1-h years of age, and to take him away just as he is beginning to work, and shut him up to menial duties alone, is the surest way to blunt his faculties and demoralise his intellectual nature. Tlie discipline and education of the school should be continued for two years longer at least. Farming has advanced, aud must ad- vance, in character as a pursuit or profession, requiring ability of mind as well as strength of body. At the conclusion of Mr. Rigby's paper, a slight discussion ensued upon it, the members all cordially agreeing with his arguments. A vote of thanks was passed to him, and the paper was ordered to be printed aud circulated. BALLARAT FARMER S' CLUB. At the usual monthly meeting at Craig's Hotel, the presi- dent, Mr. Bacchus, in the chair, the secretary read a letter received from Mr. C. T. Sutherland, cf The Grange, Tatyoon, stating that he preferred tiie months of July and August for the sowing of kohl-rabi, although he had sown up to tlie end of November with success, but hs had generally found that period too Lite to allow the plant to come to full growth before the land was wanted for another crop. He felt sure it would become a great favovirite with farmers when better known. In connection with this letter the Secretary likewise read a lengthy statement in reference to the growth aud mode of culture of the plant referred to, and which has appeared iu a former issue. Mr. Sutherland, in his explanation cf the plant, states that his horses will eat it in preference to oats and chaff, and milch cows were extremely fond of it; it like- wise did not affect the taste of milk and butter as turnips did. Its keeping properties were first-class ; in fact, he had some of it on hand from last year firm aud sound. In its cultiva- tion the ground should be well prepared in drills 33 inches apart, and then lightly rolled, after which planting could bo commenced from the seed-beds. This work, it is stated, could be easily effected by a man and two boys, the man as he walked along making a cut witli a spade on top of the drill, the first boy dropping in a liandful of bone-dust, and the second putting in the plant, only taking care not to bring it in imme- diate contact with ihe bones. The seed is of very rapid growtli, and should be sown about eight days before the plants were required, the size of the plants to be not larger than ordinary cabbage plants, aud to be planted two feet six inches apart in the drills, and in extra rich land three feet would not be too much. Mr. Sutherland stated that lie had grown bulbs as much as 20 lbs. in weight, and some even larger, but the ave- rage weight would be from 8 to 12 lbs. each. He intended hfiving t'.n acres planted next season for his stock. Tlie secretary submitted a sample of anti-rust wheat sown by Messrs. R. U. Nicliolls aud Co., of Armstrong street, in a deep clicc late soil, in the parish of Bungaree, on the 28th July, 1873. The sowing was an experimental one of li lbs , and the yield was 189 lbs. The wheat was cut on the 20th January, the straw being then five feet high ; it was perfectly free from rust, liut diflicult to thrash. The sample was that of a splendid heavy wjieat, not unlike in appearance purple or rod strav.-, and seemed to be very favourably regarded. Mr. M&.RTi:\ tlien read a paper on the sahject of local rates, as follows : In the absence of Mr. Read I have been pressed into the service, but it is not easy to say something on the spur of the moment which would be useful, and likely to merit your atten- tion. However, it has occurred to me that the English farmer presents to his club such matter as affects his interest. I shall therefore make no excuse for directing your attention to the subject of local rates. I do so with greater readiness as I know it very nearly affects every man in this room. The rates, as you are aware, are determined by the annual letting value of the property, or, in other words, in proportion to the amount of money invested therein. In reviewing the subject you will please to remember this is a new country, aud it re- mains with us to make it prosperous and great, which can only be accomplished by the investment of capital and labour in the soil ; by the cultivation of cattle and corn, orchards and vineyards ; by the planting of timber ; by the erection of houses ; by the building of schools, workshops, and factories ; and by the establishment of cities. Now, although every member of this community will acknowledge these improve- ments to be desirable, yet they suffer a system of taxation to exist which strikes at the very root of all improvement, and operates as the chief impediment to the profitable in- vestment of capital in land. To illustrate this subject, I will present facts which are known to most of you. A gentleman, who has been frequently in this room, purchased, in the suburb of this city, about eighty acres of very poor land, so poor, indeed, that it would require several acres to feed one sheep. The rates demanded by the shire did not exceed one penny per acre per annum. The owner determined to im- prove this land by expending some hundreds of pounds in manure. He purchased the best implements, employed the best labour, and the result of these investments was a mag- nificent crop. However, before it was removed, the valuator came upon the scene again, and, with an exclamation of surprise, declared it to be the best farm in the district, as the crop was without an equal. The annual letting value made a bound of several hundred per cent., and the rates were in- creased from one penny to tlie sura of one shilling per acre. This imposition very speedily abated the enthusiasm of the investor, who discovered that the money he had expended upon the land was not only subject to the ordinary interest, but, in addition, it was sulijecl to a very large percentage collected by the shire council under the name of rates. He, therefore, very wisely allowed his laud to relapse into its original wild condition, aud placed his capital into other investments. It would bs impossible to imagine anything which could more iffi-ctualiy stop improvements, or which could be more injurious and unequal in its operation than the present system of taxation. The case I have mentioned is by no means a solitary cue, as thousands of persons can testify. THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. The most speedy and certain method a man could devise to draw down upon his capital the swoop of the rate-collector is to invest his money in building houses or improving land. Every improvemeut is but the prelude to an additional burden of rates. If a man invests his money in planting- an orchard, it is subject to be rated at three shillings per acre per annum ; if a vineyard, it is subject to five shillings per acre per annum. If he should have the pretension to build something like a comfortable house, plant his ground with ornamental trees, which in time would change the bleak, dreary solitude into a place of beauty, he is at once subject to a\i additional im- position— in fact, a fine, collected under the name of local rates. The evil becomes intensified when the farmer who has fpent years of toil in fencing and clearing his land is com- pelled by the requirements of his family to replace Use hut with a more comfortable and convenient dwelling. Ills wife, poor soul, having dune her best, is now subject to many in- firmities, and he is conscious that his own health is not so vigorous as it was a dozen years ago. He has but £600, however, which is not sufficient to complete the improvements ; it would require twelve hundred. He borrows six upon the security of his land at eight per cent. The improvements give grace and beauty to the country, making it not only habitable but beautiful to live in. These improvements entwine the affections of his children around the place of their birth, and give to their aspirations the ring of true nationality. We may ask why should these investments, which have accomplished so much good, and which are still subject to the mortgage, be liable to the burden of additional rates ? The question seems to acquire greater emphasis when the land contiguous to these improvements is being held in its wild state for speculative purposes. No labour is em- ployed upon this land, no improvements are made, but the local councils, as if in admiration of the do-nothing policy of its owner, charge the land with the lowest modicum of rates. By this system of rating, the spe- culator is encouraged, and permitted by law to trade upon the enterprise and energy of those wlio invest their capital in building homesteads and cities, as well as upon the enterprise of those who cultivate the land. The speculator's land ac- quires yearly an additional value by the facilities afforded by means of roads, bridges, and such other conveniences as may be constructed at the public cost. It is no fault of the local bodies that the land has a low-letting value ; that is the fault of the owner, and should not be accepted as a reason why a low rate should be charged. From these statements it will be apparent that just in proportion as the land is reclaimed from its original wild condition and made habitable, as capital is invested in fencing, supplying water, building houses, planting trees, manuring and cultivating, so with each additional im- provement the investor is subject to an additional tax, which operates in direct antagonism to the profitable investment of money in the improvement of the country. In other invest- ments capital is not trammelled by impositions. It can be in- vested to immensely more advantage in trade, bank stock, mortgage, or in land held for speculative purposes. If these statements are true, why should not country laud be rated at per acre, irrespective of iirprovements ? Why should not city land be rated at per foot frontage? Why should the Bank of Victoria and other buildings which ornament and beautify this city be encurabeied with heavy rates, and shanties which offend the eye and taint the air allowed to go free ? The present system operates alike in both town and country, but always as an impediment to progress. Every foot of city frontage should pay its share of rates irrespective of the im- provements which may be upon it, and every acre of country land should pay its share of rates without taking into con- sideration the sum of money which has been invested in its improvement. Then some inducement would be offered to build and to cultivate, but none to hold land in its wild state for speculative purposes. Then the true workers would be unfettered, and free to raise the raw products of the soil iu abundance, and the skill of the manufacturer would be free to expend its ingenuity in constructing machinery or in fabricat- ing those delicate and durable articles of clothing which are in daily wear. If it is a self-evident truth that the source of ail nations' wealth arises from the improvement of the laud, then let each farmer and citizen endeavour to remove every impediment and clear away every obstacle which may act as a drag upon the enterprise and prosperity of the people. If the present system of valuation presses heavily upon the invest- ment of capital iu houses or land, or upon the industry of the people, let it by all means give place to a system more equit- able and just. We may then hope to check the migration of men who have done so much to give permanent prosperity to this country, and who are our best and most useful colonists. Mr. M'Clure moved a vote of thanks to the lecturer. Mr. Lewis seconded the motion. The lecturer's views quite accorded with his own in everything he had stated, and more especially in regard to town property, with which he had had ample experience. He for one felt csrtain that the system of levying rates required re-modelling altogether, as at present it was most unfair to the industrious working-man, who was obliged to pay higher rates than his thriftless neighbour, who was either too lazy or too careless to improve his property. The motion was carried uuauimously, Mr. M'DowALL gave notice that he would at the meeting in a month hence move for the meetings of the club to be held at Learmouth. He stated that the efforts of the club at present weie perhaps fully appreciated, but they were not, judging by the meagre attendance at all events, fully recog- nised. The club had done a great deal for the benefit of the farmers generally, and the press, he must state, had nobly stuck to it. In fact, but for the close and firm adherence which the press had accorded the club, it would have ceased to exist long ago, as it was merely a body in name and appear- ance, but not in reality, at least in the way of attendance, members generally preferring to read the newspaper reports to taking part in the discussion. The secretary stated that the club's town and trade members numbered sixty, as against forty members in the country. THE POWER OF THE FARMERS. There cau be very little doubt that whichever side ulti- mately gains the victory, the struggle between the farmer and the labourer will in many things result iu evil. Without laying much stress on the oft-talked-of sympatiiy and good feeling between master and man, now broken up for ever, there still remained bonds which it is a mistake to have severed. The character of Englishmen is averse to much sympathy : it is a form of sentiment against which a straight- forward and independent man revolts. The ideas and leelings which in the town are refined and softened, in the country come out iu their blunt abruptness ; and there is perhaps no section of the population which sets so low a value upon sym- pathy as the agricultural. Tli? very rudeness of the life, the strife with the weather, the battle with tiie soil, tends to pro- duce a sturdy and somewhat surly manliness wiiich cannot understand the meanings conveyed under the fine phrases of mutual forbearance, and so on, which have been so largely used in this controversy. But there certainly was an ap- preciable amount of esprit de corps, extending through- out the ranks of farmer and labourer up to a recent period. There was a common dislike of the town, its ways and men — a growling kiud of pride in the country, and masters and men growled in concert. They found fault with the same things ; they grumbled together; they could always agree in abusing the weather ; they talked freely and without distrust ; and there was not that sho.rpness of definition between the two classes that exists in manufacturing districts. The farmer did not set himself up as superior to the labourer in a coarse and insulting manner. He conversed familiarly with his men ; walked with them a mile upon the rond, without feeling in the least degree that he was lowering his dignity as an em- ployer, or showing condescension to them ; asked after their wives and families, and how the potato-patch or allotment was looking, anil geuarally showed an interest in their concerns, After the agilatiou first commenced, this species of intercourse was a long "time in dying out. The indignation of the farmers was poured entirely upon the agents who were spreading dis- afFection. No one found any fault with the labourers them- D 2 62 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. selves. If tliey thought they were really worth more per week than they were receiviug, they had a right to ask for aa ncrease of pay ; but when, after an increase of pay was granted, as the farmers maintain, to a reasonable amount, and the agitation still continued, there arose a gradual coolness, and the two classes slowly arrayed themselves into opposing forces. It was now that the employers began to blarae the employed, and to set themselves firmly against any farther movement. The lock-out in Suffolk was only what every one had seen must in the end take place, if the aspect of affairs continued unchanged .Tiiroughout the county the agriculturists had come to a distinct thougli unexpressed determination that the matter could not go on without a firm resistance being offered. In tlie markets, at the market ordinaries, wherever tiie agri- cultural world met, the lone that universally prevailed was that some decided step must be taken. When it was at last taken, and the news spread of the lock-out, the tone of conver- sation in these places of assembly grew at once firmer and more defiant. The agriculturists are slow to combine, slower still to give utterance and shape to their resolves ; but they possess a depth of feeling and a strength which is hardly acknow- edged. The latent energy of resistance which exists among the agriculturists of the whole country is incalculably great. The Suffolk movement will be endorsed, if not followed in kind, in almost every county. The suppressed bitterness of two or three years of what they, rightly or wrongly, consider unjust treatment, will bear fruit in harsh and rigid measures which it would have been to the interest of all to avoid. The farmers have an immense power in their hands — a power little understood and much underrated. It extends into the smallest affairs, especially, of course, in rural districts. Take the Boards of Guardians, for instance : they are almost exclusively formed of farmers and landed gentry. We may regret the fact, but there is no doubt about it, that many such guardians will carry, perhaps have already carried, their resentment into the board-room. In these days of open meetings and free newspapers, absolute tyranny is out of the question as much as absolute justice, but there is still sufficient liberty of action to enable a man, and more particularly a body of men, to make their ruling ideas felt by those under them. Hitherto the agricultural poor certainly cannot complain of their treatment at the hands of the unions. They have been far more liberally dealt with than the poor inhabitants of towns. They have received, too, an amount of humanity over and above the strict administration of the Poor-law. Allowance has been made, r ten rather illegally, for circumstances. Now as the local ates come chiefly from the land, the guardians must be more than men if they did not feel, under provocation, a degree of inclination to administer strict law, and nothing more nor less, to the applicants. This same system of reprisal has already been carried into effect in districts Imudreds of miles remote from the Suffolk lock-out. In most villages there are adhe- rents of the Labourers' Union. Generally the first members are the disagreeable inhabitants — the two or three perpetual grumblers aad ne'er-do-wells. They join the Union and become marked men. Perhaps they make themselves pecu- liarly obnoxious in parish matters, or did so at the late election. They very soon find that employment cannot be found in tiie parish ; no one will give them a job ; certain perquisites are cut off ; harsh refusals to grant time-honoured privileges follow ; finally they find it necessary to migrate, having first of all held themselves up as martyrs in a public cause. It may be said that all this is an argument in favour of agitatiou, hut then it must be remembered that the farmers did not begin the conflict : they made no opposition till what they believed an unbearable pitch of overbearing insolence was reached. So much for the power of the farmers in small things. The agitators argue that the farmers cannot posssibly persist in the lock-out, because their work must be done or they will be ruined. Whether this particular lock-out continues or not, it is certain that this belief is a most mistaken one. The farmers are quite able to repeat or to continue the look-out, as may suit them best. Tlie reason is obvious : the landlords are at their back. If the tenant finds that he cannot cultivats his field-;, and therefore cannot raise the money to pay his rent, the landlord seeing the condition of affairs, and feeling that his interest is identical, has only to remit the rent or part of it, and the struggle may go on indefinitely. Tlie Union agitators are consequently quite in the wrong if they imagine they cau coerce the agriculturists, provided that the latter are deter- mined to fight. The funds of the Union are as nothing to tlie wealth at the back of the farmers ; and in these days the cause with the longest purse invariably wins. The two-pence per week of the Unionist is of very little account when placed in the balance with the thousands of pounds accessible to the other side. Every hundred men locked out or on strike, while they in some measure embarrass the farmers, at the same time weaken tiie Union funds, and just at the very moment when the Union appears strongest, and can show an immense number of men doing nothing, it is really worst off, because of the incessant drain of money. Tiie labourers never for a moment dreamt that the farmers could do without them for so long as they have. They thought that a fortnight, or three weeks at least, would reduce their employers to their own terms. At the first glance there is indeed no trade or occupa- tion in the country which seems to depend so much upon the labouring man as farming. The tenant of a large farm appears perfectly helpless without them. If the strikes or lock- outs had happened some years ago, the labourers would have doubtless been right in their calculations. But it is a notorious fact that while the art of agricul- ture has been carried to a length never imagined possible formerly, and while the produce has been doubled, the number of men employed has steadily decreased. AVithout going into statistics, though such aids to inquiry are forthcoming if necessary, it may be fairly reckoned that each farmer on an average employs less men by one-fifth, taking all the year round, than he did ten years since. If the harvest and busy season alone be considered, the decrease is far larger, and may amount to one-third. Machinery has of course a good deal to do with this. The hay is mown by machines, made by machines, elevated on ricks by machines, and the fields cleaned with rakes drawn by horses. The arable farmer ploughs by machinery, sows by machinery, reaps and thrashes by iron and steel instead of thews and sinews. In the aggregate the differ- ence is something serious. The very price of labour has taught the tenant to do liis utmost to reduce the expenditure in that direction. Farmers who used to employ six men to mow, now only put on a couple. There is less too of the system of keeping men all the year in order to secure their services at a busy season. Something must be put down to the growing scarcity of labourers themselves, which also tends to teach the tenants to get on with less help. Very few far- mers now have sullicient labourers employed on their farms to get through tlie thrashing. They have to borrow meu from their neighbours. The Labourers' Union, therefore, has not taken the farmers so much at a disadvantage as they at first supposed. There were a vast number of old men, past hard work but still capable of small services, who would have been glad of a job, but who found it impossible to get one. Now they come in and assist. Then there are the regular men — the herd-men, carters, shepherds, with cottages and gardens. Many of these are too well paid to risk the loss of their wages. In this way the farmers may manage to get over the harvest with out much loss. Another feature of the agriculture of late years has been the number of men and women who come out from the towns to work in the fields, particularly at harvest. In the neighbourhood of large towns, and especially where there are factories, they come out by hundreds. Many of them like a spell of work in the open air, and the women are glad of a chance of adding to their slender incomes. Tiie immense numbers of women and girls who have absolutely nothing to do in great towns, eagerly grasp at a few weeks' e'^^ployment and fair pay in the harvest fields. In addition there are the loads upon loads of Irish whom the steamers bring over, with their brogue and tlieir sickles, to reap the English corn. A stream of them pours into Bristol and other western ports about June. Harvesting, in fact, becomes every year more and more similar to the Kentish hop-picking season. Instead of being done by the regular residents on the spot, it is got through by what may be called casual labour. The farmers have a certain amount of resourses in this floating population. But then it may be said, with all these aids, still the produce cannot be so large as it would be if the labourers were at work, and there must be loss. For the first year it is doubtful if the loss would be appreciable ; there would be some but not much — not enough to lower the receipts of an individual farmer by a serious figure. But next year, if the lock-out and strike and agitation should continue, would of course show some con- THE FAEMER'IJ MAGAZINE. 53 siderab'e decrease. And upon whom would tliis fall chiefly ? If the landlord and the tenant are agreed, and the former remits his rent, or subscribes heavilj', it is clear tliat the farmer will not suffer. The first to suffer will be the labourers. If the produce is smaller and prices rise, while wages, or rather Union pay, continues at the present 9s. per week, it is obvious that the labourer must partially starve. It matters very little whether the lock-out in Suffolk fails or succeeds. The same thing is nearly sure to occur again and again elsewhere, and each time over a wider area of country. Conceive for an instant what is not at all beyond the regions of probability, the lock-out and strike extended to the greater part of England. The farmers say, " We can wait ; we are not dependent upon a certain weekly income of a few shillings : " What would be the consequence ? The men must either starve or emigrate. That this is the fact is already practically acknowledged by the Union, wliich does all in its power to induce the labourers to go to America, or elsewhere abroad. It recognises its own incapacity to keep thousands of men in idleness for any length of time. Again, the pressure of the population, and the demand for food, prove that anything like a general lock-out or strike would be attended with serious consequences ; and these consequences must principally fall upon the lower classes who have no resources, no bankers' balance to fall back upon. There is no trade or manufacture the proprietors of wliich can afford to wait so long as the agriculturist. Fariniug is naturally a waiting business. Its professors possess the greatest of all powers, the capability of patience. They have no need to hurry. The tone and feeling o( the agricultural world at present is in such a condition that a few energetic men in a county could easily form an association for resisting the demands of the Union. The only organisation wliich now exists in agricultural districts is the very weak and feeble one of the farmers' clubs or chambers, from which politics are excluded, and discussion is confined to the narrow limits of cultivation aud subjects associated with it. The very exclusion of politics acts as a sedative, and keeps these chambers in a lukewarm state. There is no enthusiasm, no life about them. But once let an organisation be set on foot liaving for its object the suppression of Union agitation, and the farmers will throw themselves into it with energy and determination. They feel deeply on the matter. Rightly or wrongly, they believe that they have been insolently ill-treated, and held up as monsters of iniquity. This personal feeling would at once give such organizations a cohesive power never before experienced in a society of agriculturists. They will not spare either money, time, or exertion to render their efforts successful. The farming world was probably never so united and unanimous before. It is even possible that the agitation may result in permanent good to them, since it will teach them the strength that lies in unity. Already in parts very distant from that where the lock-out occurred, the idea of sending money in aid of the movement has been mooted and warmly supported. Some think that it would be better to forward men to a lock-out district, who would be willing to work on the terms offered by the employer. The only objeclion to tliis is that it might result in a collision between the Union men and the imported labourers. The Union men would certainly have no right to complain. It has long been the policy of the Union to denude a district of men as much as possible in order to force up the rate of wages there. If it is fair to take men away, it is equally fair to the other side to bring bodies of labourers from a distance. As to a collision the police must take charge of that ; and it must be remembered that either party commencing a disturbance will at once place itself in the wrong in the eyes of the impartial observers. There can be very little doubt if the movement continues, and is extended to other counties, that tlie system of sending labourers from one part to another will be put into execution by the farmers. It will be far more efficacious than money. As to the possi- bility, that is beyond question. There are men enough to be found ready to work for reasonable wages in those districts to which the Union has not thoroughly extended itself, and such districts are well known. There is such a thing posbible, too, as importing Irish labour. A well-organised gang of men thoroughly conversant with tlieir work and under proper leaders, could be sent into a disaffected district, and pass on from farm to farm, doing the work as ttiey go. This would answer better than sending a mob of men to spread themselves about and get work as they could. It would be preferable to forward them in companies, officered as it were, with a given extent of country to work over. Tiiis concentratian of labour would finish the operation iu halt the time, and would enable the imported men to present a bold front to the labourers on strike, who would scarcely care to attack a strong gang. Bui would such imported men work for less wages than the rest were out on strike for? The farmers would not stop at a few shillings a week extra to such men. They say that they do not object to ths rise of wages; wliat they object to is the Union. Give up your Union card, and we will not refuse an extra shilling. It is, therefore, quite possible that a body of men from a distance may be found working in the midst of a strike or lock-out, for wages as high as those the locked-out men require, simply because tliey are non-Uuionists. The Union tactics are very bad. They follow a course which must, if persevered in, ultimately bring them to ruin. They deport as many men as possible from a district in which the fanners are obdurate. They employ every agency to induce the men to emigrate. Nothing is left undone to thin the agricultural population. There are two pleas for this course. The first is, that the greater the scarcity of labour, the higher price it will command. The second is one of necessity. They cannot keep so numerous a body on the Union fuuds ; but they should reflect that the larger the number of men who emigrate, by so much do the twopences a week diminish, and that force of any association consists in the numbers of its members. They siiould let the men on strike or locked-out go ou the parish for relief. That would touch the farmers nearest. They all pa local rates, and many very heavily. A sudden increase o paupers would be a sore point indeed. It is true that the theory of the Poor-law is that relief cannot be given to an able-bodied man ; but in practice, if an able-bodied man present! himself at the workhouse, and shows that he is utterly destitute and without a penny, the guardians must offer him the house. As a rule they will not relieve liim iu the house, and his wife and children out or vice versa. Imagine, then, the effect of some thousands of labourers, and their wives and families, applying at the workhouse for relief. Tlie poor- rates must immediately rise to a heavy figure. The Union however, does all in its power to lighten the rates by deporting the men who served to swell them. TheUnion agitators actually boast in the papers, that since the formation of the Union and the rise in wages, and flow of emigration, the expenditure at the workiiouses has decreased one-third, and the poor-rates in equal proportion. Of course they have. The Union has taken the cause of poor-rates— has deported it elsewhere ; but this does not injure or embarrass the farmers—it actually relieves them. The tactics of the Union, therefore, are extremely ill-calculated, and their plans for coercing the agriculturist very badly laid. If the Union has succeeded in raising the wages of labourers, and in making England such a paradise for them, how is it that the men emigrate in shoals, and do not stay at home to enjoy the high wages and other advantages the UnioH has obtained for them? Anyone who will carefmly consmer the arguments adduced will at once see that the power of the farmers is no imaginary theory ; it is a real hard fact which cannot be got over. Every one must deeply regret that the exercise of such a power should ever be necessary ; but it must also be admitted that the farmers have been slow to avail themselves of it. Granted that it was quite fair, quite open to the labourers to form an organization for their benefit as a class, then it must also be conceded that the farmers have an equal right to associate together to defend their interest. It must never be forgotten that the farmers did not begin. They did not form their association first, and by injudhiious treatment and insolent language force the labourers into a union in their own defence. The labourers commenced the agitation, and the farmers did not retaliate for a long period of time. It is at least two years since the Union made itself notorious; it is only after two years that the farmers show any signs of combination and resistance. They did not refuse an increase of wages. Tliey did not give wav to their tempers, however much they may have been provoke'd. They remained quiet, waiting for the agitation to subside. What substantial point is there that the most passionate unionist can say that farmers denied their men up to this spring ? They have shown an amount of patience and forbearance which no other business men in tlie kingdom would have shown. Neither the colliery owners, nor the ironmasters, nor the cotton-miU men— none of the great trades would have waited so long. The extreme agitators are to blame for forcing matters to such a prisis. They would 5i THE FABMER'S MAGAZINE. be wise if iliey counselled modeTation ; but at what stage of the wliola affair have they ever couuselled that ? Who begau the afl'ray ? No one can say it was the farmers. The labourers at this period of the movement cannot complain if their own measures are returned upon them. The worst feature of the case is that the labourers seem completely in the liaui's of the agitators, to do as they are bid, and go as sheep to the slaughter. Ill-educated, ignorant, and prejudiced, they take every statement made to them by their so-called friends as literally true. They have no power of criticism— no penetration to distinguish the facts from the fictions. They take it all on trust ; just as they start from Liverpool on the ocean-going steamers with the most dim and visionary ideas of the land they are about to visit, ^yhether it be honour- able of educated and well-informed men such as certain leaders of the agitation are, to take advantage of their simplicity, the world can decide for itself. What may occur in time is, of course, not to be foreseen ; but it must be admitted on all hands that hitherto the conduct of the labourers has been wonderfully good. Whether congregated in immense numbers, listening to the inflammatory harangues of the Union orators, or slowly spelling out in solitude the broad hints of the Union paper of rick burning and " beacon fires," they have ever remained quiet, peaceable, and orderly. It is doubtful if any other section of the population under the same circum- stances would so long have continued well behaved. They are a rude lot, primitive in their ideas, prejudiced in the ex- treme, blunt and coarse in their expressions ; but they are not " roughs." That expressive word must be confiued to the produce of the back streets of great cities. The agricultural labourer, rude as he may be, is no "rough." There is nothing of the rowdy about him. He has not been iaduced to commit any excesses which present the faintest resemblance to a civil war. The question remains, Is there no hope of real j;ood from arbitraliou ? Arbitration certainly seems the natural outcome from such a state of things. The doubt is whether the Unionists, as represented by the agents, will ever cordially accept any decision which does not endorse all their demands. In that case, of course, the attempt must fail. Putting the agents aside, if that were possible, then without hesitation it may be affirmed that the labourers would soon come to terms of their own accord. If it were possible to get at the men apart from their organization, it may be asserted that arbitration would be successful. The farmers, as men of education, and many of them men of position, would not hold out in the face of public opinion, provided that no ultra demands were made upon tliem. But, on the wliole, there is little reliance to be put on arbitration. It may decide a lock-out here and a strike there, but it does not, and cannot, settle the question. There will still remain a feeling on both sides ready to break out. It may even be asked whether or no the best way, after all, is to let the affair come to an issue and decide itself. With that, however, the subject of the present article has little to do. The aim of the moment was to show that the fanners are possessed of immense, if unrecognised, power. In the face of such tacts, which on consideration no one can doubt, it may reasonably enough be questioned whether those are tlie true friends of the labourer who urge him to persist in courses which embitter the two classes more and more. At the same time, conscious of this power, the farmers need not continue their measures till tliey force a victory. They can afford to accept fair terms without loss of dignity or prestige. — Mr. Riciurd Jefferies in The Fort- nightl>j Review. CLUBS FOR WORKING MEN. At the last meeting of the Newbury Chamber of Agriculture, Mr. F. E. Frarapton in the chair. The Rev. (John Adams read the following paper : The subject which I have now the pleasure of introducing to your notice may, I fear, be thought somewhat inopportune, on the ground that current events do not encourage employers to discuss schemes for the promotion of working men's social welfare. Rut however strongly such a feeling might naturally prevail in many districts, it can have no force in this neigh- bourhood, for the old cordial relations between masters and men have been but little interrupted amongst us, and there is not,I am sure, a member of this Chamber who does not heartily wish to promote the happiness and prosperity of the farm labourer, in every way that he can reasonably be expected to do. I need hardly say to such an audience as I now address, that there is great room for improvement in the social con- dition of the working classes generally, and that low wages are not the only, and, in many cases not the chief hindrance to their happiness and prosperity. Anyone who lias lived and laboured amongst the poor must have seen that their earnings however scanty they may be, are sometimes sadly wasted, and that frequently every farthing vvliich is not imperatively de- manded for tlie necessity of bare existence, finds its way to the nearest beersliop. The causes of this improvidence are no doubt numerous and complicated ; but amongst them one of the most prominent is, I believe, the scarcity of wholesome places of recreation for the working man. In many country villages the beersliop is the only )dace of refuge open for liiin outside tlie walls of liis own cottage. If he wants to make himself acquainted with the current news of the day, or to smoke his pipe witli a friend, or to escape from the discomfort which must sometimes be inevitable in a small apartment scantily furnished, badly venti- lated, and not unfrequently crowded with children, where is he to go but to the beersliop ? and once there he must drink as a matter of course. In no other way can he pay lor the accommodation of the place. To provide that accommodation the landlord has to incur consideral*le expense, lie is obliged to occupy a larger house than his family requires^ to pay a licence as well as rent, to keep up a cheerful tire all through the long winter evenings, to purchase furniture specially required for the business, and to get up a variety of amuse- ments to suit the tastes of his customers. Every man there- fore who crosses the threshold is clearly under an obligation to contribute towards the support of the establishmeut. But the mischief is that instead of merely paying an equitable charge for the accommodation, custom requires him to swallow some stimulant, whether he needs it or not, at double the price for which it might be purchased elsewhere. Now, if this system could go on without injury to the condition of the working man, no one would have any right to interfere with it on his account. But it is notorious that such is not the case. The harmless attractions that lure him to the taproom pave the way to a vicious waste of money in drink, and many a man who at first innocently seeks them to escape from the misery of his own home, or because, like every other human being, he has at times a craving for social intercourse and amusement, gradually adopts the tone and custom of the place, and, almost before he is aware of it, acquires the habit of drink- ing, and becomes a confirmed tippler. Such, I am perfectly certain, is the process by which working men all over the country are brought under the bondage of the beershops, and dragged down to the lowest depths of poverty and degradation. Remedies in abundance have been tried to ceunteract this mischief, and they have all, no doubt, worked a certain amount of good ; but still the drinking goes on, and in most of our villages where tiiere is a keen struggle for custom between rival beer-shops of a low character, the agencies which are commonly employed to check intemperance, have but little influence, and seldom toucii inve- terate drunkards. A few of the most intelligent frequenters of the taproom may, for a time, be attracted, and kept in sobriety by night schools, penny readings, lectures, and such like insti- tutions. A drunkard, too, may here and there be reclaimed by teetotal vows or Good Templar Clubs, hut experience proves that none of these useful agencies can lay hold of the masses of the poor, and save them on any large scale, from the bane of the beer and liquor traffic. The reason of this comparative failure lies, I believe, in tlie fact that sellers of intoxicating drink have been allowed to monopolise two things which the working man thinks essential to his happiness, namely, rooms where he may meet his fellow men for talk and recreation, and the supply of beer by retail. No institution which philan- thropists may set up for the improvement of the working classes is likely to take firm hold of them, and maintain its ground against the temptations of tippling shops, unless it offers those two advantages — beer and amusement. Whether they are in- trinsically the greatest boons we can bestow or not, is a ques- THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. £5 tioii upon which there may be great divergcace of opinion, bat with regard to their universal attractiveness and popularity, there cau be no doubt. Say what we will against drinking intoxicating beverages, the working man will not abandon his beer ; and provide educational agencies for him ever so cheap and advantageous, he will still, generally speaking, prefer a game at bagatelle, or a gossip about the last spusational police news. After a long and mouotouons day's work, it is not much to be wondered at tliat such sliould be the case. Perhaps some wlio lament his bad taste would hive the same proclivities, if they were obliged to toil all day long in a field, oftentimes alone, and come home in the evening dull and jaded, to a scanty and somewhat uninvigorating sujiyer. When a man seeks to hook a shy or sluggish fish, he takes care to ofi"er him a tempt- ing bait. On the same principle, in trying to elevate the poor, we must adapt our schemes — so far as we can do so honestly and safely — to their tastes and habits, otherwise our elTorts, liowever zealous they may be, ^'ill be only like casting pearls before swine. What the labourers really want, especially in our villages, is a social club, possessing all the innocent charms of the beerhouse, apart from its contaminations. Such an insti- tution would give them opportunities of spending their leisure hours togetlier without being subject to tlie necessity of drink- ing, and of procuring wholesome beer at a clieap rale when they require it, under such restrictions as would prevent excess. Clubs of this character, altiiough as yet but little known in this county, have been rapidly springing up in our large towns, and in some country districts tor many years past. At the present time there are at least 700 in England, and the aggre- gate number of their members is not less than 100,000. The aim of all those institutions is to provide for the poor advantages similar to those which London We.st End Clubs provide for the wealthy. They have their reading rooms well supplied with newspapers, their rooms for conversation, games, and smoking ; their refreshment bars, some under total abstinence restrictions, and others furnished with the ordinary excisable beverages sold in a public-house. In addition to those attractions, some of them have classes for teaching singing, drawing, and modern languages, whilst most of them comjirise such institutions as coal clubs and penny banks. A-; no licence is required for re- tailing beer or any other articles to the members, and as every- thing is supplied at prime cost, the economical benefit of those clubs is considerable. On beer, e.g., the saving is equal to the expenditure, a pint costing just half the price charged for it by the publican. To facilitate their formation and maintenance, a central institution has been established in London, called "The Workmen's Club and Institute Union," which forms a medium of communication between men of all ranks who are interested in the well-being- of the lower classes, sends out lecturers, disseminates pamphlets, supplies information and rules, and makes loans of suitable books. Any Workman's Club may beafliliated to this Central. Union on payment of 5s., and thereupon become entitled to the use of the Society's Circula- ting Library, and other advantages. To the value of this agency iu Vhe infancy of a Club, I can myself bear personal testimony. Its publications, and still more the counsel of its energetic vice-chairman (Mr. Hodgson Pratt) were of much help to me in starting a club at Stockcross, and I am sure that anyone who purposes setting up a similar institution will do well to have recourse at the outset to the guidance of the Central Union. Difficulties as a matter of course cannot fail to arise in attempt- ing to establish such an agency ; and as I have spoken of its benefits it is but fair that I should allude to the obstacles which it has to cucouuter. Eirst and foremost is the apathy of the poor to all schemes for (he improvement of tiieir habits. Everyone who has laboured in their behalf must have often been discouraged by the indifference, and not unfrequently by the distrust, with which they regard efforts made by others for enlightening and elevating their minds. Perhaps this disposi- tion has in a great degree been engendered by ignorance, and sometimes by the degredation into wliich they have been suffered to live, and if so, it should rather bi; regarded as a misfortune than a fault. But worse than the apathy of the poor is the active opposition which those clubs at their com- mencement receive from beersellers. Every conceivable weapon that can be used to prevent their success is sure to be employed against them, by those whose prosperity depends upon the drink ing habits of the people. Eieeptious no doubt there are to such antagonism, and one or two have come under my own notice ; but generally speaking, I regret to say, brewers and publicans too often meet our efforts to restrain the tippling propensities of the poor in the spirit of Demetrius, the silver- smith of Epheais, who, seeing that his craft was in danger, maligned the Apostlp,and stirred up the people to shout " Great is Diana of the Ephesians." The brewing interest, as it is called, is unciuestionably a great power in the country, and it takes care from time to time to let us knov/ that no individual can with impunity interfere with its trafllc; but the time has come when every Christian man who cares for the well-being of his country sliould fearlessly lift up his voice ag.iiust tlie demon of drinli. Its ravages are literally appalling. Our gaols, workhouses, and asylums arc filled with its victims. It counter- acts all our efforts for the elevation and refinement of the masses. It weakens tire moral and physical energies of the nation. It frustrates to a great extent the work of Christ's church. But, argues the beerseller, we have no wish that men should ruin themselves with drink ; why should we be blamed? If they tipple too much the fault is their own, and not ours. Now admitting, for the sake of argument, that the fault is entirely in the customer, and not at all in the seller, we should still be warranted in restricting this trailic in a way that we restrict no other ; for its abuses bring heavy burdens upon us. When illness befalls the poor man who wastes his evenings in drink, he throws himself upon the rates. AVhcn he commits some crime in a drunken brawl, he must be clothed and fed at our expense in prison, and when he dies we have to bury him, and to provide for his destitute family ; so that as ratepayers and taxpayers, we may fairly insist upon the proper regulation of a business which brings such loss upon us, and endeavour to shut up every beershop that is not imperatively needed. In so doing, cases of hardship to individuals engaged in the trade, must, no doubt, sometimes occur; buttheir justification, if they need any, is that no private interests whatever cau be allowed to override the welfare of the public. Wliere facilities for drinking have been forced upon the poor iu excess of their requirements, as in the case iu my own parish, which has nine beersliops and licensed victuallers for a population of less than nine hundred inhabitants, the reduction of the number is the most efficient way to promote temperance ; for it is notorious that drink-sliops develop habits of drinking, just as gaming tables encourage gambling ; and it is equally certain that the speediest method ' of drying up those sources of intemperence is to cut off their supplies, by drawing their customers into an association such as I have described. The attractions which a club of this character presents are so manifest that they out- weigh any amount of opposition on the part of the publicans. As an illustration of this I may say, that in the teeth of the nine public-houses just mentioned, and with the disadvantage of a very inadequate room, a social club was started six months ago at Stockcross, whicii now comprises no less than 94 work- ing men, and that tlie leisure hours of those men during the long winter evenings were spent in innocent recreation, in place of tipping at the beersliops. Abstinence from beer has not, it is true, been required of them. On the contrary, they have been allowed to procure it direct from the brewer for their own consumption iu the club-room, but it has been under such con- ditions as to render drunkenness and intemperance impossible ; and to show how conducive to moderation such a society is, and how little the working man is disposed to waste his money in beer, if he can be kept from the beershop, I may state this striking fact, that although the quantity of beer allowed to be drunk by each member of the club has been two pints every evening, it is found that the quantity consumed has not averaged one pint, and tliat the expenditure has been less than five farthings a day lor each customer. Let me add, also another fact not less noteworthy. Since the establishraeut of the club, the village policeman has not heard of a single row in the village, nor apprehended one drunken man, although liardly a week previously elapsed without cases of drunkenness and disorder coming under liis notice. To use his own worus, "The club seems to have taken away his occupation in the village." One diiiiculty more in esiablishing these clubs I will touch upon, if I may do so without occapyiug too much of yuur time. At the outset there must be a gr^-ater expenditure than working men can afford. Two rooms are required— one for smoking and amusement, and another for reading :a bagatelle board, too, with plenty of other games, is essential. The re should also be suitable furniture, and a small stock of books. With such apparatus, a club in almost any country village might be made wellnigh, if not altogether, self-supporting. j But how are the preliminary expenses to be met? In my own ' case the resident squire, Sir Pi. Smton, has, unsolicited, under- 56 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. taken to build, uot merely a couple of rooms, but a clubliouse, coraprisiug apartments for a superintendent and all requisite accommodation for the members. Is it too much to hope that wealthy landowners generally will eserise similar munificence, or, at all events, that they will take the lead iu providing and furnishing club-rooms for their peasantry wherever they are needed ? By so doing they would not only cheer and brighten the leisure moments of the labourer's life, but would save him from temptations, which now commonly lead him to ruin. And it is not the men alone that are benefited by these institutions. They are a blessing also to their wives and children. Many a poor woman in my own parish, who has been accustomed to see her husband come home drunk and penniless from the beer- shop — an object almost of dread and loathing to his family — can now welcome his returning footstep with joy, and speak of the blessed change that has come over him since he joined the club. Nothing that I have ever done for the poor has called forth warmer thanks than the labourers' wives have given me for setting up this institution. Many a time have they made this remark, " The club, sir, is the best thing that ever was done for Stockcross." In conclusion, allow me to say that the growing prosperity of the working classes does not in the least degree exonerate us from taking an active interest in their moral and social welfare ; oc the contrary, it should increase our anxiety and concern on their behalf, for the improvement which is going on in their wages will be a bane rather than a blessing to themselves, and to the country at large, unless it is accompanied by habits of providence and sobriety. The feature which is to my mind by far the most alarming in the Labourers' Union movement is not the strike nor the look-out, but the disruption of sympathy, and the class antagonism which are springing out of the agitation. Disputes about wages soon right themselves, and are often adjusted to the mutual benefit of both parties ; but if a chasm is made iu their old friendly relations, it will not be so easily bridged over, and cannot fail to become a mutua.1 calamity. Money is not the only element essential to the labourer's well being. He needs also our personal help and guidance, to raise him from the low habits and social degradation in which he too frequently lives. After long years of indifference the country is beginning to see the expediency, as well as the duty, of insisting that no child shall be allowed to grow up in ignorance ; but experience proves that social and moral safeguards are required for men as well as for their children ; and I know of none more likely to save the poor from the snares which encompass them, than such institutions as I have ventured to commend to your notice. The Rev. Geo. R. Portal, in moving a vote of thanks to Mr. Adams, said that in starting clubs of this kind it was desirable that the men themselves sliould have the control and management of the institutions, believing that working people disliked being petted, and did not care to be patronised by other classes. He felt that there was no question as to the advantage of such clubs, and the only difficulty which appeared to present itself was as to the way in which they were to be started ? The Church of England Temperance Society had considerable funns in hand,and if the committee could be induced to grant loans for a time, to enable clubs to be started where that could not be done entirely by local efforts, much good would no doubt result. The vote of thanks was passed unanimously, and Mr. Adams, in replying, said he very much doubted whether the Church of England Temperance Society could be induced to grant loans as Mr. Portal has suggested, seeing that the con- sumption of beer was permitted at these clubs, but the Central Club in London might possibly afford pecuniary help for such a purpose. ROYAL AGRICULTURAL BENEVOLENT INSTITUTION. The annual dinner took place on Wednesday, June 10, at the London Tavern, when close upon 100 were pre- sent ; Mr. 0. S. Read, M.P., in the chair. After the usual loyal toasts, The CnAiRMAiS : I have now the honour of proposing the t oast of the evening, " Prosperity to the Royal Agricultural Benevolent Institution." Of all the agricultural societies and institutions in this great country I am confident that this Society, if it does not do the most good, certainly relievss the greatest amount of distress. It was always a matter of won- der to me in times gone by that, considering how precarious the occupation of the agriculturist is, how it depends on the fluctuations of the seasons, and how many accidents and misfortunes are almost sure to fall to the lot of those who cultivate the soil, there had not been some benevolent institution to provide for the wants of those who in old age or misfortune might stand in need of the help it could afford. It was only, I believe, fourteen years ago that this Society was started, and who could then have believed that in that brief interval it would have grown to the magnificent pro- portions it has now assumed ? I do not mean to say that we have done all we might or should have done, but I do say, having regard to the statement put into my hands, that we ought to be thankful for the good we have accomplished, and that we must hope to do a great deal more. I find that we have upon the list of those who are recipients of the aid afforded by this Society at the present moment no fewer than 297 annuitants, who are in receipt of a total sum of £6,386 per annum. On the 2'ith of this month we shall proceed to the election of 66 more annuitauts, who will receive annually a gross sura of £1,380, making a total of 3G3 annuitants receiving yearly £7,776. I say, therefore that we have reason to be proud of having accomplished this result in so short a space of time. But when I look down the list of counties from which we derive our subscriptions, I am surprised at the indifference — I might say the neglect — with which this Society is treated in some parts of the kingdom. I cannot beheve that Cornwall is so far distant but that that great mining and agricultural county might, if it pleased, con- tribute something towards the funds of the society and re- ceive something from its beneficence, I cannot believe, also that, although agriculture is so advanced in the north- ern counties, and especially in Northumberland, there are no cases in that part of the country that require relief, and that there are no kind and honest hearts that would con- tribute to the funds of this institution if asked to do so. I see that in the home counties and in the eastern counties the society is, as a rule, well supported, and 1 kcow that the suggestion has been made that instead of our anniver- sary meeting being always held in London, it would be as well to try whether we could not do something more by going into remote districts and endeavouring to stir up the latent feelings of humanity and benevolence which have been so slow to de- velope themselves in those out-of-the-way parts of the coun- try. I was, only a few minutes ago in the House of Com- mons, and an hon. member there said to me as I was about to leave — " I understand that you are going to preside at the Agricultural Benevolent Institution. I really cannot believe that there will be much call for the funds of that institution in future, in consequence of the very high rate of agricultural produce" (laughter). I may here say that a friend on my left has just told me an anecdote that is worth repeating. When he helped to rock the cradle of this institution a noble lord said to him, he did not think there was in this country such a thing as a farmer wiio would be glad to receive in his declining years a pension of £25 a-year ; and, strange to say, the very first person who applied to him for his vote for one of our pensions, was the sister of that noble lord — not, of course, for herself, but for some unfortunate tenant in whom she was deeply interested. It seems to me that a great number of people who live outside the agricultural world as well as a great number of those who are supposed to belong to it really do not know the trials, viscissitudes, and misfortunes to which the farmers are siibject. In the first place I would say that I think we, as agriculturists, must acknowledge that however great and paramount our interest was in times gone by in this country, it is certainly dechning when you come to compare it with the prosperity and activity of other industries. Twenty-five or thirty years ago no interest was so successful, no interest so powerful, no interest so generally acknowledged as the leading interest of the country as was the agricultural interest ; but if at the present moment you happen to cast your eyes over the country at large THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 67 you cannot fail to see — and you know that wliat I am statiug is correct — that the manufacturing, the commercial, and trading coraaiunities of this great country have risen and progressed on a scale altogether superior to that which has characterised the agricultural interest. Although our prices may be high, our expenses have so increased tliat in the long run we find that our profits are much smaller than they were. I will say this — that during the last ten years we luive passed through, notwithstanding the favourable balauce-slieet from Tiptree, and the remarkable reports of great pro J ace that have been written to the newspapers, and iudicted from r:iilw^y-carriages — (laughter) — notwithstanding all that has been said about the advancement of agriculture, we have not had throughout the United Kingdom an average crop of corn in any one of those years. You may take the years 1S6S and 1870 — and you know tint in those years we grew great crops of wheat — but it is well known that in those years the spring corn was peculiarly deficient, and we had also during tliose years long and terrible droughts, such as have been the ruin of many of our farmers. It should also be remembered tiiat in those ten years we have had the cattle plague, we have had all sorts of contagious aud infectious diseases ravaging our flocks and herds, and, what is worse, we do not seem as if we were going to get rid of them. If I were to take a brief retrospect of the history of agriculture in Parliament during the same period, I do not think I should find very much that we need congratulate ourselves upon. AVhen I first entered Parlia- ment we were a certain privileged class, who were in tlie enjoyment of certain exemptions; but since then all those privileges have been abolished and all those exemptions from taxation have been done away witji. I for one do not com- plain for a moment of this ; the only thing I say is that I fancy the time has arrived when the British farmer ought to claim at the hands of the British Legislature something like fairness and justice. Some of our exemptions have been done away with by the duties from which we were ex- empt being abolished altogetlier. Take the two cases of horses and fire insurance — both of them admirable tilings. Those duties have been got rid of, and at the same time they were l)oth taxes to which the farmer contributed nest to no- thing. Then we have had the small dog-tax, from which we were previously free, imposed upon us, and as if it was neces- sary to add something by which the farmer could be victimised for scaring away birds from his crops, we liave all to pay the gun-tax. The one shilling duty on foreign corn has been re- pealed. Sir Robert Peel described it simply as a regis- tration fee, but it had amounted to nearly a million of money before it was abolished, and I do not know who is the better for the abolition — certainly the farmers are not (Hear, hear). Again, if you take the way in which the farming in- terest has been dealt witii in regard to free trade in corn, what were we promised when the Corn-laws were abolished ? We were told that we should have less foreign trade, not only in wheat but also in barley, and that the Malt-tax should be abolished. But now we find that not only the Government, whichever party may he in power, not only the predominant party in Parliament, but the whole country, appears to be set against the farmer on this point, and that our chance of getting what we were promised in the shape of the abolition of the Malt Duty is more remote than ever. If there is one kind of grain we can produce better than another it is barley. We can compete with all the world in that, and yet we are told that the imposition of a tax of 50 or 60 per cent, on that commodity in the first stage of its manufacture is no great impediment to its growth and cultivation. I do not wish to dilate on this any further than to say that when people come and tell us that the abolition of the Horse-fax, which was something like 1 per cent, on the value of the horse, would stimulate the^breed of horses, surely we may say on the other hand, that a reduction of the Malt-tax would be a sensible gratuity to the farmer. Now, when we come to free-trade in cattle, what do we find? One would have fancied that if we had free-trade in cattle we should at least be protected from foreign disease ; but that is not the case, and whereas the high prices that have pi e- vailed are doubtless due in a great degree to the increased consumption of meat, I contend that a very great portion of this is due in the first instance to the untoward seasons we have lately passed through, especially in tlie great droughts of 1868 aud 1870, and in the next, and in a still larger degree, to the way in which our flocks and herds have been ravaged by contagious and infectious diseases. With regard to prospective legislation, I want to know what help the tenant-farmer is likely to receive in his struggles F First of all we have the question of Tenaut-Right, and when the tenant-farmers of EngUud simply say that they desire to have their capital which th^y have embarked in the cultivation of the soil protected by law, we are asked this question, even in chambers of Hgricult ire, " Are you, the independent and patriotic fanners of E igland, going to class yourselves with women and Irish cottars and lunatics?" One would naturally suppose that it was tba duty of the State to protect the capital of the tenaut-farmer as well as the property of any other class of people, and here I would draw a comparison between the statement that was nwde some twelve months ago by a noble lord who occupied this chair, and who said that in his great agricultural county there are only two recipients of the benefits of this institution. I believe that Tenaut-Right extensively prevails in Lincolnshire, and it seems to me that as tar as decayed farmers aie concerned, Tenant-Right does not manufacture them to auy great extent, at least, there. But I turn to ray own county, where, unfortunately, Tenant- Right does not exist, and there I find that we have no fewer than 70 recipients of the bounty of this institution, and I say that some of this is due to the insecurity of tlie tenant's capital. I will touch lightly on the question of game. It is a ticklish subject, ana I do not wish to enter into it further than to say that it is the opinion of one of the high- est judicial authorities in the land that it is so remarkable a tiling for the landlords to give their tenants the right to kill rabbits, that when in one instance this right was given on the eve of a general election, the landlord who gave it had to suffer the loss of his seat. With regard to a question which agitates the mind of the Scottish farmers so much, and on which they appear to be so unanimous— I refer to the ques- tion of hypothec, or, as it is called in England, the law of distress — that seems to me to be a matter that is likely to b solved by Parliament sooner than the other questions to which I have referred. Aud here I would say that, however much the abolition of the Law of Hypothec may benefit the large farmers and the great capitalists, I fear it will not be very much in favour of those poor farmers, those small men who are on the verge of ruin, aud that if we do repeal the law, whatever else may happen, I am quite sure of this — the funds of this institution will be called upon just as much as ever. I have put these things before you just to show those who happen to be outside the agricultural world, and who do not understand it, that there is not only great, but iucreasingjieed for institutions like this. It has been said over and over again of the farmers of England that altbougn we live well we die poor, and in the future as well as in the past I be- lieve we shall still prove the truth of this old agricultural maxim. I say that as far as regards the farming interest there is greater need than ever of the increased exertions of our Agricultural Benevolent Institution for the augmentation of its tunds. I know of nothing more harassing than to read over the list of the unfortunate applicants for the annuities of this Society. It has been said, with great truth, that every farmer who at the close of the day cannot bring to his mind this fact that he has done something to make those about him happier and better than they were in the morning has nofful filled his duty to his neighbour. I say that those who neglect to subscribe to the funds of this institution do not do their duty to their neighbour. It is some consolation to those who have supported this institution to feel that they have been a comfort and a solace to the declining years o f many a deserving individual. I am sure that the founder of this institution must feel this comfort and solace in his declining years — although I am happy to say that lie does not seem to be declining at present, as lie is still in posses- sion of that health and vigour we have all been accus- tomed to see him enjoy for so many years, and it will be a source of gratification to all the subscribers to know that they have been doing good to their unfortunate brethren while this Society has gone on increasing and relieving an amount of affliction which perhaps few similar societies have been enabled to alleviate (cheers). A list of donations and subscriptions was here read. These included £25 (annual) from the Queen, 10 gs. (annual) from the Pnnce of Wales, 10 gs. from JMr. C. S. Read, M.P., 20 gs. from the Drapers' Company, 20 gs. from the Vintner's 58 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. Company, and 10 gs. from Mr. J. E. Curtis— the total amount- ing to £6,700. Mr. C. Wken IIoskyns, in proposing tha Cliriirman said he felt great pleasure inhaving to speak of an old friend whose life had been closely connected witli agriculture, and who had rendered great service to it. He first had the pleasure of see- ing Mr. Head at a country meeting of the Royal Agricultural Society. He could not remember what show it was, but ha recollected that Mr. Read was engaged in the implement department, and he might add that in consequence oi' that his own labours as a steward were very light. On the next occa- sion that he met him he was again in the implemeat depart- ment of the same society, and he could not help saying that they were deeply indebted to Mr. Read for the rapid progress of improvements in the implements used in agriculture in England. There was hardly any other department of English enterprise which had done so much to benefit not merely this country, but almost every country in Europe, or in which such large fortunes had been amassed — he would say deservedly amassed — in the wonderful development of skill in mechanism. He next came in contact with the Chairm-in while he (Mr. Wren Hoskyns) was acting as one of the editors of the Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society, in which capacity he found that while Mr. Read had done, and was doing, so much out of doors, he was also rendering great service to agriculture indoors with his pen (cheers). He then had the pleasure of reading in manuscript some of the most interesting articles from the pen of the Chairman ever written on agri- cultural subjects, and he might say of Mr. Head that he had shown that it was possible to be eloquent on such topics. He next had the pleasure of meeting him at a gathering of the civil engineers of the country, the deep interest which he had taken in agricultural engineering having led to his presence on that occasion. It was tiien that he first had the pleasure of seeing him with the addition ol M.P. to his name, and he could truly say of him that no man ever bore honours which had come thick upon liim in a more easy or modest manner (cheers'). They had had the misfortune to sit on opposite sides in the House of Commons, but though their politics differed he had seldom heard Mr. Read say anything with regard to agriculture iu which he did not concur, lie next saw him as the President of the Chamber of Agriculture— an oflice which he showed thorougli capacity to fill, and he believed the Chamber had never been more successful than it was during the year that he presided over it. Mr. Read had lately been entrusted with the highest point ever attained by a tenant-farmer in this country — an iaiportant oflice in the Government (cheers). That elevation seemed not to have changed his character in the least, or to have engendered any- tliing like conceit ; and it was pleasant to be able to say of him that never in his life had he been known to turn his back on a friend, whether he was an old or a new one. It was one of the misfortunes of those who rose to such positions as that now occupied by th.e Chairman, that they were liable to hear a great deal said about tlieir merits by others, including old friends. That was the first time in his life that he had ever had the pleasure of proposing Mr. Read's health, and he could truly say that there was not one word of exaggeration in what he liad uttered with regard to him (c'.ieers) . When a man had been raised in consequence of the abilities which he liad displayed in a high olficial position, he must discharge his duties with the most absolute impartiality, every Englishman and every class of Eaglishmen being alike to him officially. Tliat was a necessary condition of official life in connection with the Government. It had placed Mr. Read in a rather trying position, and he (Mr. Wren Hoskyns) would ask that gentleman's old friends, his farming friends, his political friends, and particularly those who thought they liad special claims upon him on account of the past, not to expect him to do more than lie had a right to do in his capacity as a member of the Government, and to remember that special interests must be subordinated, as it were, to the general interests of the whole country. They ought not to feel surprised if he were not able to pay to as much at- tention as some had expected him to pay to the interests of agriculture, seeing that he was responsible for the proper discharge of tiie duties of his oilice in relation to the whole kingdom (cheers). The toast having been drunk very cordially, The Chairman, in returning thanks, said he felt deeply in- dehted to all present for the kind manner in which the toast had been received. His friend, Mr. Wren Hoskyns, had ia proposing it revived pleasant memories, which were almost obliterated. It was most gratifying to lii:n that that toast had been proposed by the author of Ta'pa, the most clas- sical book on agriculture ever written, and one which had clothed even the dull life of the tenant-farmer with features of pleasurable excitement. He heartily thanked his friend for the closing words of his speech. Among the pleasant asso- ciations connected with the responsibilities of his new official position there was this drawback — that some of his friends, his agricultural friends particularly, fancied that he was shirking his duty, and neglecting their interests. He hoped that what liad fallen from his friend Mr. Hoskyns v/ould teach tliera to be a little charitable, and to make all due allowances for one who, having accepted a responsible post, was bound, as a good soldier, to khov/ and carry cut ths re- quirements of discipline and duty. Certain duties which devolved upon him in his present position were extremely pleasant. He liked his work; he was well "contented with his wages " (laughter) ; he esteemed his col- leagues ; he found the officials of his office to be hardworking, zealous, and able public servants; but he must confess that when he went into the House of Commons a certain reticence that was imposed upon liim was a serious drawback to his satisfaction. Let him inform his friends, however, aad particularly his agricultural friends, that whatever lie could do for tlie cause of the farmer he would do (cheers). Al- though lie had the honour to iiold a position which he believed no other tenant-farmer ever had held, though lie held an important, if subordinate, office in the Government of the country, he could never forget the claims of those to whom he belonged, and to whom he owed indirectly his present position (clieers). In conclusion he must express his satisfaction at finding in the list of donations just read that a great many persons whom he termed "outsiders" were liberal contributors to an institution founded for the benefit of unfortunate persons connected with farming in Ensjland. The Marquis of Huntley, in proposing " The Agricultural Sofieties ot England, Ireland, and Scothnd," alluded to the great services wliioh tliose institutions had rendered to agri- culture. He did not agree with the Chairman that agriculture had decreased in importance relatively to manufactures ; on the contrary, he felt certain it was as great and as powerful as ever. As regarded tlie Chairman's own career, he saw no reason why he should not yet be a member of Her Majesty's Trivy Council, and he thought agriculturists had great reason to rejoice that tliey had such an able representa- tive of their views , in the Government (cheers). The noble Marquis concluded by associating with tiie toast the name of Mr. Meohi, whom he eulogised f )r his enterprise as an agri- culturist and as the chief founder of tliat institution. Mr. Mechi, in responding, said he felt very much gratified at the growth and success of the Royal Agricultural Benevo- lent Institution — an institution which had done much to mitigate the distress of a class who, generally speaking, could hardly he considered responsible for the position to whicii they were reduced. Manufacturers were not, like farmers, subject to the sad effects of blight and drought and the vicis- situdes of seasons. In that respect agriculture was at a dis- advantage as compared with the general industries of the country. In other respects, however, the position of agricul- ture was much better tlian it was a hundred years ago. Steam had changed everything, and if agriculturists availed them- selves of it as much as manufacturers had done they would, he believed, be more prosperous and have more money for that institution (cheers). There was not less than 1,800 millions of capital represented in the land and agricuhure of tliis country, and he believed agriculture might still be regarded as the most important interest in the country (cheers). Sir John Moiiris proposed "The Executive Council," coupling with the toast the name of Mr. Charles S. Cautrell. Mr. Cantrell said in that institution they knevc nothing of politics. At one anniversary the chair was taken by Earl Spencer ; at another the foremost man of the day, Mr. Disraeli, occupied that position (cheers). The Council resolved many years ago that they would not dabble in bricks and mortar, and to that principle they had firmly adhered. Three or four years ago Lord Sondes suggested that they should if possible increase the amount of the pensions ; but the Council, after giving that suggestion the most careful consideration, thought it better to increase the number of THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 69 pensions. They had been told by tlie Chairman how many pensioners were on the funds of tlie benevolent institu- tion, but he had not told them this further important fact— that during the last fourteen years they had given 400 pensions, and that there were now no less than 2iG candidates for the 66 additional pensions that were shortly to be granted. Tliey would never have been able to do what they had done had it not been for the valuable aid of the honorary local secretaries. Mr. J. K. Fov.'LEB suggested that with the view of in- creasing the income of the Society there should be a special appeal made at all the market tables in the country at the bcgiouing of October in every year, and spoke of the great benefit derived from the Commercial Travellers' Schools through an annual appeal to Iravtllers in all parts of the country. The Chairman said he had in his previous remarks pur- posely avoided the labour question, but he could not help observing that in the county which he had the honour to lepresent — Norfolk, since the formation of that Society the wages of the labourers had advanced fully 50 per cent., and that if that rate of increase were to continue the funds of the association would not suffice to meet the cases which would arise. Mr. Mecui : You must use more steam. Tlie CiiA-iRMAJf : Even the steam would not protect farmers against everything. The remaining toasts included the Secretary and the Hono- rary Local Secretaries, for wlioiu Mr. Piank Sherbon an- swered. THE ULSTER TENANT-RIGHT BILL. BY AN EAST ESSEX FARMER. Of the four bills for the amendment and estensiou of the Irish Laud Act that were on the list of orders of the day for second reading on Friday week, but none of which were discussed owing to the time taken up by the debate on the Intoxicating Liquor Bill, Mr. Butt's Ulster Teuant- Right Bill is by far the most comprehensive. Indeed the present title of the bill is too narrow to give an adequate idea of its contents ; but in the first clause it is stated that if the bill passes it may be cited as the " Land Act (Ireland) 1874." It not only defines the principles of the Ulster Custom, which was only imperfectly legalized by the Act of 1870, aud proposes to extend those principles to the rest of Ireland, but also in some important respects amends other portions of that Act. Although, as appears from discussions upon the bill that have recently taken place in Ireland, it fails to give complete satisfaction to the more advanced of the Irish tenants, it will probably be considered by our Conservative House of Commons as a somewhat "revolutionary" measure, and it is un- doubtedly a bold and uncompromising attempt to deal with a diiFicult problem. Mr. Butt has divided his bill into four parts, which we propose to describe in their order, without, however, entering into the particulars of every clause, but only giving the gist of the principal provisions. Part I. is headed, " Provisions for better securing the Ulster Custom of Tenant-Right," and aims at legalizing and more strictly defining what Irish tenants term the Ulster Custom in its integrity. This part of the bill, then, proposes: 1. To extend the operation of the Ulster Custom to every holding proved to be subject to it, whether that holding be agricultural or not. 2. To declare illegal all newly made (less than 40 years old) estate rules in limitation of the tenant's power to dispose of the good- will of his holding for the highest price which he can obtain for it either by private coatract or in the open market. 3. To decide in the negative the disputed point whether leases can abrogate the custom. 4. To define the limits of the landlord's power of objecting to accept a purchaser of the Tenant-Right of a farm as his tenant. 5. To define the Ulster Custom to be the custom as it existed 40 years ago, except in cases in which it came into practice within that period. 6. To declare that in every district in which the custom is proved to prevail generally, the jiresumptlon shall be that every individual holding is subject to it. Part II. is entitled, " Provisions for better securing the compensations provided by the Land Act," and proposes : 1. That a new lease or agreement, a chancre of tenancy, or an addition to or diminution of the area of the holding shall not be deemed an interruption of the continuity of the tenant's title to compensation under the Land Act. 2. That in any agreement for a shorter term than a lease of 31 years, consent on the part of the tenant to contract out of the Act shall not be valid, unless it can be shown to have been made for valuable cousiderations. 8. That the 12th section of the Land Act (1870), which sanctions any tenant of a holding valued at £50 and upwards in contracting out of the Act, be repealed. 4. That where an under-teuancy was created before the passing of the Act, the under-tenant shall be entitled to compensation under the 3rd section. 4. That in cases of eviction by title paramount, the tenants shall be entitled to compen- sation under the 4th section of the Land Act. 5. That a tenant's violation of an agreement with his landlord shall not debar him from compensation under the third section of the Land Act, though the chairman may take such violation into account in awarding compensation. Part III. consists of " Provisions for extending the benefits of the Ulster Custom to other parts of Ireland." Of this part of the bill it is enough to say that if it passes in its present form it will place the tenant of every holding in Ireland in precisely the same position under the law as an Ulster tenant will occupy if the first part of the bill also passes without alteration, and that it also enters into particulars as to the method which a chair- man shall adopt in settling the amount due to a tenant when the landlord is the purchaser of the Tenant-Right. Part IV. consists of " General Amendments of the Land Act," and recommends: '"'1. That a chairman should be at liberty to call in two referees, one appointed by the landlord and the other by the tenant, to assist him in settling any disputed question. 2. That a chair- man or judge should have power to empanel a jury. 3. That a landlord and tenant may agree for a fee-farm grant of a holding, and that such grant shall be equivalent to a sale as far as the provisions of the Land Act are concerned. 4. That yearly tenancies shall terminate on the last gale-day of the year. 5. That an assignee of the estate of a limited owner shall have the powers of a limited owner. G. That schedules of improvements, instead of being filed in the Lauded Estates Court, shall be filed in the office of the Clerk of the Peace for the county, and shall be entered in a book, to be called the Land Registry of such county. Such are the outliues of Mr. Butt's bill, and they will be sufficient to enable our readers to form a fair estimate of its scope and intentions. There is no doubt that it will meet with wcry strong opposition, and we do not sup- pose there is any likelihood of its being passed in its pre- sent forju by the existing House of Commons. The pro- posal to extend the principle of the Ulster Custom to thj whole of Irelaud will be especially objected to, and we can ia imagination already hear the cry of confiscation raised in 00 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. opposition to it. But, after all, without pronouncing a decided opinion as to tiie expediency of tlie plan, it is not easy to see tohat it would confiscate, unless it be certain powers and privileges. That it would tend to the confis- cation of any property is more than doubtful, since it is generally admitted that in Ulster laud of a given quality is worth more rent than it would be worth in any other province of Ireland. That there are other and very strong objections to the Ulster Custom we are perfectly aware ; but these chiefly concern tenants, who in Ireland are generally in favour of the custom, and who ought to know their own business better than an outsider. There is no doubt that the sale of Tenant-Right in the open market is the simplest way of settling compensation of unex- hausted improvements : whether it is the best way is another question. Irish tenants say that it is the best way, and that it would benefit landlords, tenants, and cons'umers alike. To our English ideas it is certainly less objectionable in principle than the allowance of com- pensation for " disturbance" which the Land Act provides for. But apart from this debatable third part of Mr. Butt's bill, it contains some amendments of the Act of 1870 which would greatly simplify and improve its working. That the Act needs amendment no one who has watched its working will deny. It could scarcely be expected that so great a measure would not contain many defects, especially as there were so many adverse opinions amongst those who had a hand in framing and in altering it before it became law. It has long been obvious that it was drawn so defectively as to render it easy of anyone so dis- posed to evade the intention of its authors and to outrage the spirit of the Act. Mr. Butt has done his best from his point of view to remedy these defects, and his bill at any rate deserves the careful attention of Parliament, THE BATH AND WEST OF ENGLAND SOCIETY, AND SOUTHERN COUNTIES ASSOCIATION. MEETING AT BRISTOL. In point of fact, the show of the old West of England Society was not held this year at Bristol, but at Clitton — that is to say, from the nearest railway station to the ground there had to be encountered a three-miles ride or walk, all very much up-hill, over a bad dusty road, and under a hot blazing sun. Having all things in consideration, your Bristol fly-man or 'buss-man did not take that advantage of the occasion which might have been expected, al- though long before the shilling days conveyances ran short, and visitors waited and wandered about Bristol for hours together ; as, had the rain only set in the result must have been a miserable failure, instead of an immense success. As it was, later on in the week the cruelty to animals, which must have been practised in whipping over-worked ma- chiners up to the show, might have justified the inter- ference of the Prevention Society, not so much against the mere drivers or proprietors, as the members of the Council in again selecting a site at so an unwarrant- able distance from everywhere. Of course, it is all very well for these officials who took good care to secure to themselves the best accommodation in Clifton : but look- ing a little further into the interests of the general public, there can be no possible doubt but that in the absence of a junction line to the Downs the choice of such a meeting- place was an egregious mistake ; as if Bristol had no- thing better to oS"er closer home, the Society should have gone elsewhere. However, breasting the hill aft'orded a fine trial for condition in the stock, and Mr. Walter's Shorthorn cow died of the way up. In the opening report, which we gave on the opening day, we were enabled thus early to sum-up the show as " only a fair average one" and nothing more. In truth, in some of the classes, like the old Shorthorn bulls and bull-calves, and a class or so of Shorthorn heifers, there is nothing which we can expect to see stand as well at Bedford as it did at Bristol. The marked moderation, indeed, of the Shorthorns was emphasized by the award of the champion prizes, both of which went to the Devons, with the Shorthorns showing nothing very formidable, for either the best bull or best cow. And yet we have seen slroiign- entries of Devons, although these are very sure to repeat themselves at the Royal meeting 'in the Midlands, there being so few of the sort now about, with the prize stock mainly in the hands of three or four exhi- bitors. Again, there should be better Herefords, as at any rate some of the " plums" of last season were not to be found here; and the Sussex, if numerically great, are often common in character, the old story of stealing the Devon cross being not now so noticeable. The Channel Islands cattle, with another judge on, were put about a bit ; but there was plenty of merit here, not that we think there will be any material revision of the list on a second reading at Bedford. As we said in our last number, " the show of horses of all sorts is one of the largest ever seen at these meet- ings ;" but even thus early we questioned its quality, and the " nag" classes are pretty generally inferior to Ply- mcuth ; while the cart stallions and mares are better than those shown in the companion classes of riding stock. The sheep section, either in the way of general competi- tion, or individual merit, is mostly but of second-rate order, and, with the exception of Mr. Treadwell's famous old Oxford, the winning Leicester rams and a Cotswold or two, there is scarcely a sheep amongst any of the leading breeds which threatens to make much mark hereafter. Of Southdowns, to quote ourselves again, " there is only a moderate display," and Lord Chesham's best Shropshires were clearly not at Bristol. It may be stated further in the way of proof, or want of proof, how there was a deal of discussion over the Short- horn awards, with only really one recognised Shorthorn man on the bench ; while the presence of two such energetic supporters of the red cattle as Mr. Edward Cane and Mr. Quartly must have had all its weight when it came to the deciding courses, backed as they would be by Mr. Pope. There is always a difficulty in comparing different breeds ; but with no such difficulty before them, the riding-horse judges went as wrong as they well could go in their choice of the champion weight-carrier. The Shorthorns, as the gentleman said of his wife's relations, were a " very miscellaneous lot," with some well-known animals amongst them, but with others never heard of before and not very likely to be heard of again ; the Somerset and Dorset breeders, with the signal excep- tion of Mr. Bruce Kennard, being quite overshadowed by entries from further a field. The business here opened indifferently enough with such a bull as Mr. Richard Stratton's Protector placed first, whereas in the two-year- THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. Gl old class at Hull he was never uoticeil, nor lias he ever made much mark, save at some merely local meetings. Either in or out, we seldom saw a bull show himself worse than Protector: he has a dreary haug-dog look when on parade, and stands as ungainly as can be iu his stall. In fact, he lacks not only style but masculine bearing, and is just a good bit of beef with a broad back and fairish quarters, but mean and drooping forward. The second prize, Leeuian, the best yearling in 1873 and the reserve number at Hull in the same class with Protector, is weariug well and shows a deal more hue bull character than tlic other, although his tlashy roil-and-white mark- ngs will always tell against him — not that we ever expect to see the Stratton's bull beat him again. The reserve number here was the Cornwall Duke of Oxford, second at Barnstaple and first at St. Austell, as our special reports have told ; wliile he also beat Protector when they met at Plymouth iu 1873. The best lloyal yearling, Sir Arthur Ingram, is only now commeuded ; but he has grown even plainer and meaner in the interim, having never been much of a show animal, and now with little beyond his touch in his favour. The remainder of the class was ver}' miscellaneous, and the lump of flesh put first but a butcher's verdict. Writing of Hull we said " Mr. Outhwaite's winning calf, a son of lloyal Windsor, is straight and shallow with a plain head, but very showy out," aud Lord Godol))hiu since then has gone on famously, lie still stands rather high ; but to see him move iu the ring, what with his great liberty and grand carriage, was a pleasure indeed — the more especially after having been treated to a view of such a goer as the best old bull. Godolphiu, still pre- serving his fine straight outline and growing kinder about his head and horn, fairly placed himself, as if he but furnishes and drops a little to his leg, he has all the makings of cpiite a first-class, full-growa bull — a very different thing from a first-prize calf. Kapid Rhone, on the contrary, has goue off, standing very badly on his hocks and ruuniug altogether wroug in his quarters ; as it is a question whether at all points Colonel Loyd Lindsay's lengthy, useful bull should not have had the second place. And these three were all the judges had any call to dwell over, the contingent being still quite "miscellaneous." So far the decisions had been tolerably well received for critics with so many dilfereut fancies as Shorthorn men indulge in ; but over the cow class there was quite a sensation when the renowned Vivandiere, the best cow at Hull, Harrowgate, and Gainsborough in 1873, and a winner all over Yorkshire and Lancashire from her youth upwards, was now placed only second in her class. Of course upon precedent there were plenty of people ready to run down the award ; but although at six years old Vivandiere is still wearing well, and showing the better for not being quite so full of flesh, we go altogether with the judges in their preference for Victoria Victrix, a really sweet heifer, full of fine cow character, and at the same time broad enough and wealthy enough for any useful purpose ; while she begins with a pretty, kindly head, and barring her quarters, which are growing gaudy, she is at most points a very handsome specimen of her kind — in f act more of a cow than the Yorkshire one, whose chief merit is mere beef. Iu the heifer class, on the other hand. Lady Pigot's red heifer, the famous Rose of Wytham, has been overdone, and, as she threatened last season, is now showing coarse, steery, and lumpy ; so that she was well beaten by Messrs. Hosken's white, a stiaight symmetrical Oxford, showing rather light and lathy from having been a deal about of late, first at Barn- staple in one week, aud not only first again but the champion cow or heifer at St. Austell in the week fol- lowing, and that immediately preceding Bristol. At Barnstaple our report, written by an accomplished Shorthorn breeder, declared that " in the heifers not exceeding three years oil .Messrs. Iloskeu exhibited a perfect gem— thick, mellow, tubular, and worthy of com- petition anywhere;" as aj;aiu, our special correspondent at St- Austell, another Shorthorn breeder, said " Moss Rose takes the cup as the best female in any class of cattle, ana a charming heifer she is." So that she goes on to Bedford with a charactjr, not merely from about home, as she also beat here Baroness Conyers, the third prize to the Rose of Wytham at Hull, aud now growing into quite a grand heifer, with a fine straight top, as con- sidered by many the best of the class, which included two or three more smart things. Another Wytham of fine quality was beaten amongst the yearlings by that won- derfully good roan from Blandford ; straight and square, with a beautiful coat and of good quality. Queen Mary is yet more promising than when she came out at Ply- mouth last summer, when we thus wrote of her: ''Mr. Kennard's calf was quite in keeping for good pomts with the other winners amongst the Shorthorn females, having touch, hair, and style, but she was a long way in advance of the rest of the class." Here also there were a few more to look at ; but the heifer-calf class now con- tained scarcely anything of much account. On the whole, beyond animals like Lord Godolphiu, the Hoskens' heifer, aud Mr. Kennard's yearling, who placed them- selves, we cannot give much weight- to the Shorthorn decisions at Bristol. Mr Randell is more of an "all- round " judge than one with any especial Shorthorn pro- clivities, and Mr. Aylmer is chiefly known westward for the inconsequential impartiality with which he helped to uj)set awards at CardilY, which he had helped to make at Dorchester. There was said to have been a suspicion of foot- and-mouth disease hanging about the county shows just previously held further westward ; as for this reason or some other a considerable number of the Devon entries were not sent on. In fact, nu- merically the Devon was the weakest breed ou the gi'osnd, although the classes actually came to include the two champion animals— the best bull aud the best cow. Aud with neither of these selections do we agree, as had the Ilerefords been anything liLe as strongly represented in the ring we really believe that they must have won both these extra premiums. As it was, two Devon julges and a third, who only loves the Devous less because he loves the Sussex more, looked to thoroughly talk down the one Hereford judge and the two Shorthorn men. In truth, the show of Devons was hardly anywhere a great one, as it is curious to see how the Flitton herd has fallen away since the death of Mr. Davey, and this has naturally let in the Somerset Devons, The champion here, ]Mr. Farthing's Master Robin, a winner of many first prizes, has improved considerably since last season, and is now a straight weighty useful animal, but he lacks much of the style and high-breeding of the North Devon, material points, for which the best bull-calf is far away his superior. Whereas the best bull- calf at Hull, the Flitton Duke of Plymouth, is getting mean and plain, although he now reversed positions with the yearling put before him at Barnstaple. Picture, again, is not so handsome a cow as she was a heifer, and when one compares so noble, massive, and thorough a specimen of his breed as Wiuter-de-Cote with Master Robin, or such a cow in such a class of cows as the great grand Sunflower, with Picture, one comes to see how these champion prizes must result in simply a majority of votes. The Hereford cows, as at Cardiif, ran up unmis- takably to the best class of any kind of animal ou the ground, with four high commendations and another com- mendation attached to the actual awards ; and with all 62 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. these honestly earned, it is only charitable to conclude that the " other" judges knew nothing of " other" breeds when they pave way as they did. In the Devon heifers in-calf a Temptress was beaten again, as she was was at Barnstaple, further evidence of a decline ; and in the two younger classes Mr. Senior from Buckingham- shire won with a couple of smart Moss Roses, Ihc calf beibg especially clever and promising. It would so seem from this that the Bronghton herd has not yet been quite broken up. As we said when we last saw him, Von Moltkc has grown out of show form, or, as the return will tell, is no longer a prize Hereford ; and Winter-de-Cote had a long lead, as we spoke to him both at Plymouth and Hull as the best bull of his breed out. I'evv of the younger animals here, however, threaten ever to compare v>"ith such a bull or the entry of cows, as one missed sadly from the class of heifers in-calf — running only to a couple of moderate things — the Leeu beauties, Exquisite and Satellite, as we hope in reserve for Bedford ; while the yearling heifer class was far better filled ; if few of the calves, male or female, looked to have mneh merit, the cow-calves being " a very miscellaneous lot." The Sussex bulls seldom show to much advantage, as probably from the ready comparison with the Devon they look coarse and common, and handle harshly — some proof at any rate of their not being " contaminated." The best young bull at Plymouth, short in his coat and bad in his touch, now succeeded to the first place in the older class, with another first prize or two, like Mr. Turrill's and Messrs. Stanford's Dorchester calf in the entry. The younger bulls were generally plain, especially about their heads, and the judges took for their best cow an animal of size and weight, but of not the nice character of the second best from Craw- ley ; as even the other cow from Jlr. Duke's herd, the highly commended from Slinfold or the brothers Stanford's cntiy were more comely and suggestive of the milk-pail. A beef cow at a breeding show is, or should be an abomina- tion. The champion, however, of the Sussex was Mr. Agate's level, bloodlike, and really handsome two-year-old, the first yearling at Plymouth, and surely something of a model to improve by. The three best yearlings were also good, it being a very near thing between the second and third, the displaced Hartley Honey showing more breed- ing, but with the worst of it in the way of age and size. Amongst the calves the Stanfords distinguished them- selves with a good straight heifer]of far better touch than many of the breed ; as the merits of the Sussex centred over the heifer classes, the general strength of this sort certainly depeudiug more on quantity than quality. In good proof of how these agricultural meetings still continue to develop, and spread the best types of their breed, we may cite the show of Channel Islands cattle at Bristol — one of the largest and certainly one of the best exhibitions of Jerseys and Guernseys ever got to- gether. The Jersey, no doubt, has long been in favour, if until lately people did not know much about its actual merits ; whereas but a few seasons back it was a matter of some difiiculty to find a sufiicicnt number of creditable Guernseys over which to award the prizes of the several classes. But at Bristol the advance was really extraordiuaiy, with eight cows and nineteen heifers, many of wliich were very superior animals, and, even further, most of the entries fairly good. In fact, the heifers, so much general merit was there, took a deal of judging, if the best cow, a magnificent and about perfect specimen of her breed, readily placed herself. This is Mr. Rendle's Duchess, who iu or out of the Island has equally distinguished herself, having been first at Truro, Jersey, and Guernsey in 1871, first at Cardiff Royal and Guernsey in 187^, first at Guernsey iu 1373, and ouce 1 more first at the Island show a few weeks back. The best bull was also very good, as Mr. Euudle Watson, another home breeder, is carefully cultivating the native cattle, will J Mr. Compton is establishing them in the New Forest ; so that the Guernseys are in every way advancing, alike for looks, nse, and moucy value. There was only a short show of all-aged Jersey bulls, and only one good, the Forest-bred Blue Bonnet,' as the Surrey Crocus is growing coarse and common ; but both the prize yearlings were worthy of their places, and Mr. Simpson highly and honestly commended for one over which a big figure was refused last season from America. But the Wray Park herd was rather over-paced here, and in a wonderfully good class of cows, where almost everything was commended, it was something even to get as near as second. In another admirable class of heifers, another of Mr. Simp- son's breed took the same place, although easily beaten for first by Mr. Gilbey's beautiful fawn, at all points perhaps the best Jersey now about. And yet, mulli])lyiug as these beauties are, it is noticeable how little some folks know of their points : here a Hereford man will take you up to one unnoticed, and will ask indignantly " if it ain't the best ? Look how level and well covered she is!" Just as if he were appraising a Christmas steer. Others, again, will go all for the bag ; but the "stocking" of milch cows' udders, that is the trick of not milking them for some time before they are led into the ring, will never deceive a judge who really knows his business. Many of the animals cannot retain their milk in such a case; and if a bag be the least mis- shapen, the faulty part becomes only the more con- spicuous when over-loaded. One Guernsey exhibitor in his zeal even went a little further, and dyed his cow's bag and the inside of her ears with annaito ! for which in due course he received a rebuke from the judges, stern but dignified, that would have done credit to the Lord Chief Justice or the Speaker of the House of Commons. Go, and observe the eleventh commandment, " Thou shalt not be found out." There were, by way of a " spurt" three champion pre- miums ofi^ered this year — £30 for the best cow or heifer in milk or in calf; £40 for the best bull, and £50 for the best hunting horse ; and not one of these, as we are in- clined to think, was rightly awarded. The light horse show, though larger, was nothing like so good as that at Ply- mouth, as was pretty clearly demonstrated by the fact that an animal then merely commended was now pro- nounced to be the best of all. This was Mr. Battams' Hector, certainly the best of a very moderate lot of all- aged hunters, ilr. Battams taking both first and second in the next class of four-year-olds, where the competition was yet more indifferent, so that so far it was pretty plain sailing for Kilworthy. The three-year-olds, how- ever, included a brown or black by old Hunting Horn, called Black Prince, and a colt of great power, fine symmetry, and plenty of breeding, set off by a somewhat plain head. He thus proved well enough to stand along- side of, but when the winners came iu together it was a horse to a hen on the young one. In fact the Black Prince's action at three-parts speed was everything which a man could wish for in a hunter — bending beautifully to his bridle, and going strong and oily, with his knee nicely bent, but not too round or high, it was all the over-v\'cighted Hector could do by nicking and cutting off corners to keep within hail. And so the judges, utterly ignoring the far greater promise in every way of the three-year-old ripening into the better 14st. hunter, duly awarded the championship to Hector, as false a decision at the time and place as ever was recorded. Mr. Legg was out of luck again with his two-year-old, which we fancied a deal more than the chesnut put before him ; while there was some hunting character about Mr. TilE FAEMEK'S MAGAZINE. 63 Qiiartley's old grey mare, aad aoniethiog eke was preferred to her. The hacks and ponies were mostly common in appearance and slovenly in action ; thongli The Hart is a showy gentleraaa who takes a deal of riding, aad Major Ballard handled him as gingerly as if he were taking his ship through the chops of a dangerous channel. But this was nothing to the " exhibition " kiadly afforded by Mr. Bolton on a miserable grey, with which he pirou- etted in froat of the stand, after the manner of Signor Smytho at a circus. As this riding performance promised to occnpy some time — and the judging was as slow as a Bristol waggon— we waudered away elsewhr", only to find on our return that the grey had taken the second prize, as for looks or action she was one of the very worst in the class. It is really fortunate the Major was steering the Hart, or they might have put the "grey hack filly, aged 6 years" — so ruQS the description — first ! The veteran Hunting Horn had little to beat in the special class, as -Jocko looked to be the best stamp of horse for getting hunters in the class proper, but they put Reinfrid, a very bad third at CardilY, first, and something else second. We are fain to admit that we never fancied the riding test less than at Bristol, although the other judge, Mr. Harvey Bayley looked to be putting his trust in it. The best cart stallion is a very handsome, showy horse, who can move, but the judges would not have the Clydes or Suffolks, though there was not much merit in their second prize. The mares and foals ran up to a fairly good class, with the winner worthy of her name, and quite a smart mare, and there were some useful two-year- olds ; but taken through, the show of di'aught horses was short and not very imposing, and we do not believe in mules, if some of those paraded at Bristol were big enough and ugly enough for anything. The Leicester judge thought very highly of young Mr. George Turner's sheep, and not much of anything else, and so Mr. Turner's high-bred looking entries took everything they tried for, that is, all the prizes for rams, and the first with his one pen of ewes. The Cotswolds were better represented than for some time past, and here and there reminded one of the days when the Games and the Lanes and the Hewers would make so grand a display. The worst class was that of old rams, while (he Messrs. Gillett's two prize pens of ewes were handsome, sorty, and altogether superior specimens of their breed — and a floek is thought to be highly tried with two "topping" lots of ewes. Amongst the Southdowns Mr. Rigden has so far had his hold on the place once occupied by Lord Walsing- ham ; but we expect to see better sheep of the breed at Bedford, although the Heasmans, Sir William Throck- morton, Mr. Pcafold, Lord Portsmouth, and Mr. Sydney "Waller were in competition. Mr. Rigdea's best old sheep, now four years old, was second at Dorchester, Cardiff, Plymouth, and Hull, as he alway^trnck us as a particularly neat sheep, beginning with a very true type of head. Sir William Throckmorton's two pens of ewes are also of a very pretty stamp, but running it through the Southdown show was not of remarkable merit. According to the judges they gave the prizes in the Shropshire classes to the sheep which "looked most like South- downs," and so Lord Chesham was first ; and when Mr. Pulley was second it was with a ram bred straight from Latimer. The best old sheep was never previously ex- hibited, but served his time as a shearling in Ireland. As we intimated last week, Mr. Treadweli's old Oxford Down ram is here, and stUl about the best sheep on the ground ; he has spread into great size and weight, but he did good service on Mr. Street's flock last season in Bed- fordshire. The Dake of Marlborough, who made his first ap- pearance here, was first in the companion class of rams, and Mr. Milton Druce, the only other exhibitor of Oxfordshire Downs, was second best throughout. The absence of Mr. Rawlence, whose flock is about to be sold oft', toll sensibly on the quality of the Hampshire Down entry, although ilr. Morrison's two prize shearlings are bred entirely from Balbridge sheep. The Ru=s?l!3 had also omitted to eater, and as they sent nothing from Font'aill into the old class of rams or amongst the cres, a new name or two will be found in the return ; the Bnlbridge beauties being terribly missed amongst the ladies. By the way, some "Zo;2^-wool Dorsetshire Downs" were ex- hibited in the special classes. How is this cross arrived at or the description maintained? Horns from Exmoor, Somerset, aad Dorset, aad Devon Long-wools completed the sheep show, with the prizes still mainly in the hands of the same exhibitors : Lord Poltimore for Exmoors, Mr. Herbert Farthing and Lord Bridport for Somersets, aad Mr. Corner for Devons, although the supremacy of the V\'illitou sheep was occasionally disputed by Sir John Heathcoat-Amory, who won with ewes, and Mr. Piadmore, who showed the best old sheep ; Mr. C jraer, however, contriving to keep some place in the prize-list in every class. But, no question, there is a deal of " practice with science" required iu preparing a show-sheep, and we heard at Bristol how an intending exhibitor has sent out a couple of Shropshire rams to be trained by another flock- master for the Bedford meeting ! And as the trainer has a number of winners amongst his own lot the, others will probably have the benefit of a very high trial. The Berkshires are maintaining or rather extending their lead, and again the Berkshire sows made up the best class of pigs on the ground ; while Mr. Hewer's best all-aged boar was probably, taken singly, the best of all the pigs ; and the younger boars very generally an excel- lent class, with commendations scattered throughout. There has been a deal of dabbling between large and middle amongst the white p igs, aad neither of the two classes of large boars contained anything more than moderate ; but the sows were much better, both classes ia fact being good, and Mr. Beswicke Royds winning iu both with five capital pigs. The small blacks were nowhere so good, and the younger class of small white boars generally indifferent ; nor were the single sows so much in fashion as they have been. Indeed, neither the small v,hites nor small blacks were quite up to the average, while the large whites were not liked, and the Berkshires unmistakably the favourites. But then they are quite " at home" in these parts. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES. — Divo>'s AXD Sussex : E. Cane, Berwick, Lewes; J. Pope, Horaingham, Warminster ; J. Qaartly, MoUaiid, South MoltoQ. Shoethorxs a^d Heeziords : H. Ayl- mer, West Dereha-.n, Stoae Perry, Norfolk ; C. N. Hiuks- man. The Poles, Ludlow ; C. llanJ ell, Chadbory, Evesham. Chjlnnel Isla:\"D : J. I};iai'jreil, Ditcheliag, Sussex ; H. Tait, Royal Shaw Partn, Windsor. Sheep— Lo>g-U'ool: J. Painter, Belgrave House, Forest-road, Xotts ; G. Walms- ley, Ridstor, BridlicgtoQ. Short -WOOLS: J. Ford, Rushton, Blandford ; T. Horley, The Fosse, Lea- mington ; J. E. Rawlence, Bnllbridge, Wilton. Horses — Agricultue.u, : J. H. Wood, Humberstone, Grimsby ; A. Lovibond, TUorngrove Close, BriJgnater. Hc^'TERS AND Hacks : T, H. D. Bajley, Edwinstowe, Ollertou ; H. D. Boalton, Putaoe, Bedford. Pigs : G. M. Sexton, Wherstead, Ipswich ; M. Savidge, Sarsden, Chipping Norton. Lxsfector of S^EARI^"G: £. Oldmg, Sahsbury. DEVONS. Bull, two iind not exceeding four years old. — First prize, and Champion Prize as best of all the bulls, W. Farthing, Stowey Court, Bridgwater (Master Rabin) ; second, Mrs. Langdon, Flitton-Barton, North Molten (Duke of FUttoa Sth). Highly commended : J. Jackman, Hesworthy, Laun- ceston (Earl of Exeter). Commended : J. H. Buller, Downes, ! Crediton. Bull, two years old.— First prize, Mrs. M. Langdou (Duke of Plymouth) ; second, J. Gould, Baraplylde Lodge, Poltimore (Bampfylde). Commenaed : J. H. Buller. 61 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZIKB. Bullcalf.— First prize, J. A. Smith, Bradford P vcrill, Dorcliester (Albert Victor) ; second, W. Farthing ( \Iaster Willie), lliglily commended : Mrs. M, Langdoii (D ike of Bedford). Cow in calf or in milk. — First prize and Champion ?ri/,e as best of all tlie cows and lieifers, J. A. Smith (Pic ure) ; second, J. Bradbeer, Pyoland, Tauutou, Somerset (Nanc }. Ueifer in calf or in milk, n')t exceeding three years oKl. — First prize, W. Farthing (Nellie) ; second, Mrs. M. La i^dun (Temptress 3rd). Heifer, not exceeding two years old. — First prize, T. L. Senior, Bronghton, Aylesbury (Moss Rose the 1st) ; second, Viscount F'almouth, Tregothnau, Probus (Plymouth Queen). Heifer calf. — First prize, T. L. Senior (Moss Rose the2uJ) ; second, J. A. Smith (ilunest). SliUlU'lIOP.XS. Bull, two and not exceeding four years olJ. — First prize, R. StrattoD, The Duffryn, Newport, Monmonthshire (Protector) ; second, G. Fox, Harefield, Wilmslow, Cheshire (Leeman). Highly commended: W. Hosken and Sou, Loggnu's Mill, Hayle, Cornwall (Duke of Oxford). Commended: W.Linton, Sheriff Hutton, York (Sir Artiuir Ingram). Bull, not exceeding two years old. — First priz**, J, Oulli- waite, Biincss, Catterick, Yorkshire (Lord Godolphiu) ; second, Lady Emily Pigot, Branches Paik, Newmarket, Suf- folk (Rapid Rhone). Commended : Lieut.-Col. Loyd-Lindsay, V.C, M.P., Lockinge Park, Wantage, Berks (Prince Rupert). Bull-calf, six and not excecdins twelve months old. — First prize, Lieut.-Col. Loyd-Lindsay, V.C, MP. (Lord R-ockville) ; second, Rev. R. B. Kennard, Maruhull Rectory, Blandford, Dorset (Marquis of Blandford). Cow in call or in milk. — First prize. Lady Emily Pigot (Victoria Victrix) ; second, J. Outliwaite (Vivandiere). Higbly commended : J. Stratton, Alton Priors, Marlborough, Wilts (Euphemia) ; G. Game, Cliurchhill Heath, Chipping Norton, Oxon (Butterlly's Duchess). Heifer in calf or in milk, not exceeding three years old. — First prize, W. Hosken and Son (Moss Rose 2iid) ; second. Lady Emily Pigot (Rose of Wytham). Highly commended: R. Fookes, Milton Abbas, Blandford, Dorset (Lady Penrhyn). Highly comrueuded : J. Outliwaite (Baroness Conyers). Com- mended : J. A. Mumford, Brill, Thame (Edith Emily). Heifer, not exceeding two years old. — First prize, Rev. R. B. Kennard (Queen Mary) ; second. Lady Emily Pigot (Princess of Wytham). Highly commended : Lord Sudeley, Toddiugton House, Winchcombe, Gloucestershire (Seraphina Bella 2ud); J. S. Bult, Dodhill, Taunton, Somerset. Com- mended: R. Stratton (Brilliant Flower). Heifer-calf, six and not exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, R. Stratton (Regalia) ; second, B. St. John Ackers, Prinknash Park, Paiuswick, Gloucestershire (Lady Carew). Commended : Lord Fitzhardinge, Berkeley Castle, Berkeley (Lady Wild Eyes 7th) ; Lieut. -Colonel Loyd-Lindsay, V.C, M.P. (Diana). HEREFORDS. Bull, two and not exceeding four years old. — First prize, Mrs. S. Edwards, Wiutercott, Leominster (\Vir.ter-de-Cote) ; second, H. J. Bailey, Rosedale, Tenbury (King of the Dale). Highly commended : W. Evans, Llandowlas, Usk, Monmouth- shire (Von Moltke 2nd). Commended: T. Thomas, St. Hilary, Cowbridge, Glamorganshire (Sir John 4tli). Bull, not exceeding two years old. — First prize, W. Taylor, Showle Court, Ledbury (Tredegar) ; second, H. N. Edwards, Broadward, Leominster (Alfred). Highly commended : J. Harding, The Greenhouse, Bridgnorth, Salop. Commended : T. Thomas (Symmetry), and Rev. A. Clive (Baron 3rd). Bull-calf, six and not exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, W. Tudge, Adforton, Leiutwardine (Regulator) ; second, Mrs. S. Edwards (Plato). Commended : W. B. Pereu (Lord Compton). Cow in calf or in milk. — First prize, T. Thomas (Sun- flower) ; second, T. Thomas (Rosaline). Highly commended: E. Benjafield, Gummershay House, Stalbridge, Blandford (Matchless 2nd) ; Mrs. S. Edwards (Young Mermaid 2nd) ; T. Rogers, Coxhall, Bucknell, Salop. Commended : VV. Taylor, Showle Court, Ledbury (Dainty) ; U. Bull (Countess). Heifer, in calf or in milk, not exceeding three years old. — First prize, T. Fenn, Stonebrook House, Ludlow (Lady Stan- ton). Commended: W. B. Peren, Compton House, South Petheiton, llminster (Rosalie). Heifer, not exceeding two years old. — First prize, P. Turnef Leen, Pembridge (Verbena) ; second, J. W.James, Mappowder Court, Dorset (Rosebud). Highly commended : P. Turner (Isabel). Commended : P. Turner (Snowdrop) ; H.N. Ed- wards, Broadward, Leominster (Dolly). Heifer-calf, six and not exceeding twelve mouths old. — First prize, T. Fenn ; second, H. N. Edwards (Gary). Highly commended: W. Taylor. Commended: T. J. Carwardine Stockton Bury, Leominster (Helena). SUSSEX. Bull, two and not exceeding four years old — First prize, A. Agate, West-street, Horsham, Sussex (Alfred 2nd) ; second, J. Turvill, Hartley-park Farm, Alton, Hants (Hartley). Highly commended : P. H. Ellis, Clayton, Hurstpierrepoiut (Knight-Errant) ; E. and A. Stanford, Eitons, Ashurst, Steyuing (Dorchester). Bull, not exceed u^- tAo years old. — First prize, G. C. Carew-Gibson, Saad,Mte, Pulbro', Sussex (My Lord); second, J. Turvill (Tom). Highly commeaded: R. Mills (Young Bismarck). Bull-calf, six and not exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, G. C. Carew-Gibson ; second, J. and A. Heasraan, Angmering, Arundel, Sussex, Highly commended : A. Agate (Grand Duke Srd). Cow in calf or in milk. — First prize, B. Duke, Lyminster, Arundel, Sussex (Primrose) ; second, G. Smith, Paddockhurst, Crawley. Highly commended : C Child (Jewell). The Class commended. Heiler in calf or in milk, not exceeding three years old. — First prize, A. Agate (Auburn) ; second, J. and A. Heasman, (Maria Stuart). Ueifer, not exceeding two years old, — F'irst prize, J. and A. Heasraan (Pride of Ham) ; second, G. Smith (Pride of the Famils). Highly commended : J, Turville (iluuey). Heifer-calf, six and not exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, E. and A. Stanford ; second, A. Agate (Honesty 1st). Highly commended : A. Agate (Adelaide itli). CHANNEL ISLANDS. JERSEY. Bull, two and not exceeding four years old, first prize, Mrs. Malcolm, Beechwood, Lyndliurst, Hants (Blue Bonnet) ; second, G. Simpson, Wray-park, Reigate, Surrey (Prince Crocus). Bull, not exceeding two years old, first prize, J. C. F. Rams- den, Busbridge-hall, Goldaming, Surrey (Modoc) ; second, VV. Gilbey, Hargrave-park, Stanstead, Essex (Ducal). Highly commended : G. Simpson (The Queen's Favourite). Cow, exceeding three years old, in calf or in milk, first prize, G. D. Digby, Sherborne-castle, Dorset (Miss Edith); second, G. Simpson (Gentle). Highly commended : W. Gilbey CTal). Commended : W. Gilbey (Medora), J. C F. Ramsdcu (Grisette), G. D. W. Digby (Queen of the Vale), F. L. Pop ham (Flora), G. Simpson (Queenie and Florence), J. Buck- man (Fancy). Heifer, not exceeding three years old, first prize, W. Gilbey (Fan) ; second, G. Simpson (Pretty Lass), Highly com- mended ; R. Rendle. Commended: R. Rendle and T. F. Horner. GUER>'SEY, Bull, two aflL not exceeding four years old. — First prize, Rev. J, R. Watson, La Favorita, Guernsey (No. 1 Clotli of Gold) ; second, E. A. Sanders, Stoke-house, Exeter, Devon (Prince Humbert). Bull, not exceeding two years old. — First prize. Rev. J. R. Watson (No. 3 Cloth of Gold) ; second, H. Compton, Manor- house, Minestead, Lyndhurst, Hants (The Duke). Com- mended : E. A. Sanders (Prince Amadeus), Cow, exceeding three years old, in calf or in milk. — First prize, R, Rendle, Catel-farra, Guernsey (Duchess) ; second, Rev, J. R. Watson (Portia), Highly commended: H. Comp- ton (Ada). Heifer, not exceeding three years old. — First prize. Rev. J. R. Watsou (Esmeralda) ; second, J. B. Carey, St. Uelene, St. Andrew's, Guernsey (Nelly). Highly commended: Rev. J. R. Watson (Sylva). Commended : II. Compton (Betty) ; J. James, Les Vauxbelets, Guernsey (Buttercup). SHEEP. LEICESTEKS. Yeai ling ram. — First and second prizes, G. Turner, jun,, Thorpelands, Northampton. TflE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 65 Ham Of aUy otlier age. — Eirst and second prizes, G. Tur- ner, jun. Pen of five ye.irlins ewes. — First prize, G. Turner, jun. ; second, J. H. Buller, Downes, Crediton, Devon. COTSWOLDS. Yearling ram. — First prize, Royal Agricultural College Farm, Cirencester ; second, J. Gillett, Tangley, Cliipping Norton, Oxfordshire. Commended : J. Gillett. Ram of any other age. — First prize, Cirencester College ; second, J. Wheeler and Sons, Long Compton. Pen of five yearling ewes. — First and second prizes, T. and S. G. Gillett, Kilkenny, Faringdon, Oxon. Commended : T. Thomas, St. llilary, Cowbridge. DEVON LONGWOOLS. Yearling ram. — First prize, R. Corner, Torweston, Wil- liton, Somerset ; second, Sir J. H. Heathcoat-Amory, Bart., M.P., Knightshaves-court, Tiverton, Devon. Ram of any other age. — First prize, G. Radmore, Court- barton, Thorverton, CuUompton ; second, R. Corner. Pen of five yearling ewes. — First prize. Sir J. U. Heathcoat- Amory, Bart., M.P.; second, R. Corner. SOUTHDOWNS. Yearling ram. — First and second prizes, W. Rigden, Hove, Brighton. Ram of any other age. — First prize, W. Rigden ; second, Sir W. Throckmorton, Bart., Buckland, Faringdon, Berks. Pen of five yearling ewes. — First prize, Sir W. Throck- morton ; second, H. S. Waller, Farmington, Northleach, Gloucestershire. Highly commended : Sir W. Throckmorton. UAMPSUIRE DOTNS. Yearling ram. — First prize, A. Morrison, Fonthill-house, Tisbury, Wilts ; second, A. Morrison. Ram of any otlier age. — First prize, W. F. Bennett, Chil. mark, Salisbury, Wilts ; second, J. Barton, Harkwood Farm, Basingstoke, Hants. Pen of five yearling ewes. — First prize, W. Parsons, Monk Sherborne, Basingstoke; second, T. Chapman Saunders, Water- combe, Dorchester. SHE.0PSH1RE8. Yearling ram. — First prize. Lord Chesliam, Latimer, Ches- ham, Bucks; second, J. Pulley, Lower Eaton, Hereford. Ram of any other iige. — First prize, Lord Chesham ; second, W. Baker, Moor Barns, Atherstone, Warwickshire. Pen of five yearling ewes. — First prize. Lord Cheshara ; second, W. Baker, Moor Barns, Atherstone, Warwickshire. Commended : J. Pulley, Lower Eaton, Hereford. oxyoRusniRi downs. Yearling ram. — First prize, Duke of Marlborough, K.G., Blenheim Palace, Woodstock ; second, A. F. Milton Druce, Twelve Acre, Eynsham, Oxford. Ram of any other age. — First prize, J. Treadwell, Upper Winchendon, Aylesbury ; second, A. F. Milton Drace. Highly commended : J. Treadwell. Pen of five yearling ewes. — First prize, Duke of Marl- borough ; second, A. F. Milton Druce. SOMERSET AND DORSET HORNS. Yearling ram. — First prize, H. Farthing, Nether Stowey, Bridgwater, Somerset; second, H. Farthing. Ram of any other age. — First prize, H. Farthing ; second, H. Farthing. Pen of five yearling ewes. — First priee. Viscount Bridport, Cricket St. Thomas, Chard, Somerset ; second. Viscount Brid- port. EXMOOR AND OTHER MOUNTAIN. Ram of any age. — First prize, Lord Poltimore, Poltimorc- park, Exeter. Pen of five yearling ewes. — First prize, Lord Poltimore ; second, Lord Poltimore. HORSES. rOl. AGRICULTURAL PURPOSIS. Stallion foaled before 1872.— First prize, W. Wynn. Cranhill Leys, Grafton, Alcester, Warwickshire (Nonpareil) ; second, S. Davis, Woolashill, Pershore, Worcestershire. Stallion foaled in 1872.— First prize, S. Butler, Stitchcombe, Marlborough (Young Lincoln) ; second, R. Canning, Rams- bury-park, Hu»gerford. Commended : VV. Byford, the Court, Glerasford. Mare and foal, or in foal. — First prize, E. Gibljs, Chitterne, Heytesbury (Smart) ; second, J. Hennessy, Conygre-house, Filton (Blossom). Highly commended : W. Stanford, Charl- toa-court, Steyning (Brown). Commended: W. Priday, Podsmead-house, Hempstead (Smiler). Filly foaled in 1872.— First prize, VV. Baker, Moor Barns ; second, S. Davis, Woolashill, Pershore. Highly commended : Lieut.-Colonel Loyd-Lindsay (Patty). Commended : T. David, St. Athan, Cowbridge (Diamond). HUNTERS. Thoroughbred stallion for iiunters. — First prize, Major J. Simpson Ballard, The Verlands, Cowbridge (Reinfrid) ; second, Lord Fitzhardinge, Berkeley Ci.stle (Red Cloud). Mare or gelding, foaled before the Ist January, 1870. — First prize, and Champion Prize as best weight-carrying hunter, G. Bland Battams, Kilworthy, Tavistock (Hector) ; second, J. W. Miles, Shirehampton. Highly commended: L. Cornock, Aldbury, Thorubury (Kington Lass). Mare or gelding, foaled in 1870. — First prize, G. Battara«, (Sea King) ; second, G. B. Battams (Penzance). Highly commended : U. Ceoper, Hazbwell House, llminster (Crown Prince). Filly or gelding, foaled in 1871.— First prize, E. G. Legg, Combe Down, Beaminster (Black Prince) ; second, W. Trist (Sydenham). Colt, gelding, or filly, foaled in 1872.— First prize, H. Cooper (Royal Oak) ; second, E. G. Legg (Rainbow). Colt or filly, foaled in 1873.— First prize, H. J. Bailey, Rosedale, Tenbury (Precosity) ; second, N. Cooke, Chevi- thorne Barton (Second Flight). Mare and foal, or in foal. — First prize, H. Carter, Catty- brook, Almondsbury (Brisk) ; second, F. Quartley, Brindley, South Molton (Moonbeam). HACKS. Mare or gelding, 1-t hands and not exceeding 15 hands 1 inch, calculated to carry 14 stone. — First prize, \Y^ Rookes, Baring House, Exeter (Prince) ; second, S. Butter, Hitch- combe. Mare or gelding, l-t hands and not exceeding 15 hands 1 inch. — First prize, R. N. Hooper, Stanshares Court, Chipping Sodbury (The Hart) ; second, J. Gifford, North Caibury, Castle Gary (Eliza). PONIES. Mare or gelding, not exceeding 14 hands. — First prize, T. L. Senior (Pride of the Vale) ; second, A. Stevens, Park Place, Cardiff (Cwmro). Mare or gelding, not exceeding 13 hands. — First prize, C. A. Jacobs, Riding School, Clifton (The Gem); second. He v. J. Coleman, Allerton Rectory, Weston-super-Mare (Jenny). PIGS. LARGE BREED. Boar, one year and not exceeding two years old. — First prize, C. R. N. Beswickc-Royds, Pyk.-, House, Littleborough ; second, J. Dove, Hambrook, Bristol. Highly commended : R. E. Duckering, Northorpe, Kirton Lindsey. Boar not exceeding one year old. — First prize, R. E. Duckering ; second, J. Wheeler and Sons, Long Compton, Warwickshire. Commended : C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds. Breeding sow in farrow, or exhibited with her litter. — First prize, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds ; second, J. Wheeler and Sons. Highly commended : M. Walker, Stockley Park, Anslow, Burton-on-Trent. Commended ; J. Dove, R. E. Duckering. Pen of two breeding sows, not exceeding nine months of age.— First and second prize, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds. Highly commended : J. Dove. Commended : J. Dove. SMALL BREED (BLACK). Boar, one year and not exceeding two years old. — First prize, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds ; second, J. Wh«eler and Sons. Boar not exceeding one year old. — First prize, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds ; second, the Earl of Portsmouth, Eggesford. Commended : the Earl of Portsmouth. Breeding sow in farrow, or exhibited with her litter. — First prize, J. Wheeler and Sous ; second, the Earl of Portsmouth. Highly commended : the Earl of Portsmouth. Pen of two breeding sows, not exceeding nine months of ags. —First prize, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds ; second, the Earl of Portsmouth. Highly commended : T. Rose, Melton Magna, Wymondham. SMALL BREED (WUITE). Boar, one year and not exceeding two years old.— First prize, C. R. N. Beswicke-Boyds ; second, R. E. Duck«ring. Commended : M. Walker. 66 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. Boar, not exceeding one year old. — First prize, J. Dove ; second, M. Walker. Breeding sow in farrow, or exhibited with her litter.^ First prize, C. R. N. Beswicke-B.oyds ; second, R. E. Ducker- ing. Pen of two breeding sows, not exceeding nine months. — First and second prizes, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds. BERKSHIRE. Boar, above one year and not exceeding two years old. — First and second prizes, W. Jlewer, Sevenhampton, Higii- worth. Highly commended : A. Stewart, Saint Bridge Farm, Gloucester. Commended: Cirencester College ; H. Humfrey, Kingstone Farm, Shrivenham, Berks. Boar, not exceeding one year old. — First prize, Cirencester College; second, A. Stewart. Highly commended : W. Hewer and H. Humfrey. Commended : J. Dove ; B. St. John Ackers; A. C. Bailey, Swindon, Wilts ; U. Humfrey. Breeding sow in farrow, or exhibited witii her litter. — First prize, Cirencester College ; second. Marquis of Aylesbury. Highly commended: A. Stewart and II. Humfrey. Commended: N. Benjafield, Short's-green Farm, Motcombe, Shaftesbury; A. Stewart, Wheeler and Sons, and Sir W. Throckmorton, Bart. Pen of two breeding sows, not exceeding nine months. — First prize, A. Stewart ; second, Cirencester College. Highly commended : A. C. Baily, J. Dove. SPECIAL PRIZES. HORSES. Cart stallions. — Prize, Sir J. H. Greville Smyth, Bart., Ashton Court, Bristol (Prince Imperial). Thoroughbred stallions for hunters. — Prize, T. Kinsman Bickell.'St. John's, Lamerton, Tavistock (Hunting Horn). Pair of mares or geldings foaled before January 1st, 1869, best suited for town-work. — Prize, S. Batler, Stitchcomb, Marlborough (Drummer and Captain). Cart mare or gelding foaled in 1870. — Pirst prize, J. W. Miles, Shirehampton ; second, E. Philliraore (Prestbury). Cart mare or gelding foaled in 1871. — First prize, C. L. Hunt, Court Farm, Over, Westbury-ou-Trym (Diamond) ; second, E. Phillimore, Prestbury-park Farm, Cheltenham (Perfection). Cart mare or gelding foaled in 1872.— Second prize, W. Stanford (Diamond). MULES. Mule, male or female, above 15 hands high. — First and second prizes. Flower and Sons, Stratford-on-Avon. Highly commended: Duke of Beaufort, Badminton. CATTLE. Pair of Shorthorn Heifers, calved in the year 1872. — Prize, Mr. R. Stratton. One entry. Pair of Hereford Heifers, calved in tlie yeer 1872. — Prize, W. B. Peren. One entry. Pair of Devon Heifers, calved in the year 1872. — First prize, W. Farthing ; second, T. L. Senior. Two entries. SHEEP— LONGWOOLS. Pen of 10 i-tooth couples in the wool. — Prize, T. Allen, Thurmaston, Leicester (Leicesters), One entry. Pen of 10 4-tooth couples in the wool. — Prize, G. W. Homer, Athelhampton, Dorchester. One entry. CHEESE AND BUTTER. Judges : R. H. Symes, R. Harding, J. Pearce. Thick Cheese, 3 cwt. of 1873 and 3 cwt. of 1874, over 561b. each. — First prize, G. Hoddinott, Manor Farm, Norton St. Phillip ; second, G. Gibbons, Tunley, Camerton, Bath. Thin Cheese, 3 cwt. of 1871 make only.— First prize, G. Harris, Court Hou.se, Lower Cam, Dursley ; second, J. Smitli, Nupdown Farm, Hill, Thornbury. BUTl'ER. One dozen pounds of fres-h butter.— First prize, Mrs. J. Thatcher, Beechwood Farm, Portbury : second, W. H. Wil- liams, Home Farm, Dodington, Chipping Sodbury, HORSE-SHOEING. First prize, J. White, Leighton Mendip (41 minutes) ; se- cond, R. Holcombe, Bishop's Lydiard (26 minutes) ; third, C Weaver, Wells (31 minutes). Highly commended : G. Eth ridge. Bishop's Stoke (30 minutes). Commended : J. Hallet, Portbury, Bristol ; and J. W. Batten, Wadeford, Chard. THE ATNNUAL MEETING took place on Tuesday, Sir Massey Lopes, Bart., MP., the president, in the chair. The Secretary read tlie annual report of the Council, from which it appeared that the funded capital, which at the close of 1863 was £3,608 15s. 9d., had by repeated investments been raised to £7,200 Consols, the amount at which it now stands, inde- pendently of a considerable balance in the hands of the Society's bankers. There were at present on the books : Life governors and life members, 89 ; governors, 117 ; annual members, 750 ; total, 956. The Council recommended that Mr. Richard Benyon, M.P., of Englesfield House, Reading, be elected president, tliat the Right Hon. the Earl Morley be elected vice-president, and that the following members of the society be appointed members of council, to supply vacancies occurring by retirement, by rotation, or other causes : Eastern DivisioN.-Clement Bush, Weston, Bath; Thomas Danger, Rowford, Taunton ; James Hole, Kuowle, Dunster; J. Webb King, A^^est Everleigh, Marlborough ; J.E. Knollys, Fifzhead, Taunton ; R. Neville-Grenville, Butleigh, Glaston- bury ; Gabriel S. Poole, South Brent, Weston-super-Mare ; E. W. Williams, Herringstone, Dorchester ; Herbert Williams, Stinsford, Dorchester. Western Division. — Hon. and Rev. J. T. Boscawen, Lamorran, Probus ; John Tanner Davy, Rose Ash, South- molton ; John Daw, Exeter ; R. R. M. Daw, Exeter ; Charles Gordon, Wiscombe, Honiton ; W. R. Gilbert, the Priory, Bodmin ; James Quartly, Molland, North Devon ; E. U. Vide], Coruborough, Bideford ; Richard Wippell, Rudway, Thorverton. Southern Division. — A. F- M. Druce, Twelve Acre-hill, Eynsham ; Rev. John Goring, Weston Park, Steyning ; Arthur Grenfell, Queen's Terrace, Windsor ; Wyndham Portal, Mal- shanger, Basingstoke ; W. Rigden, Hove Farm, Brighton ; W. B. Siraonds, M.P., Abbot's Barton, Winchester ; G. Simp- eon, Wray, Reigate ; J. 11. Stebbing, St. Andrew, Southamp- ton ; J. S. Turner, Chyngton, Seaford. Elected WITHOUT Reference to Districts. — JamesD. Allen, Pyt, Tisbury ; Thomas Duckham, Baysham, Ross , H. M. Holdsworth, Wilton, Salisbury; S. P. Newbery, Plympton St. Marv, Devon ; Henry Robertson, Overstowey, Bridgwater ; II. D. Skrine, Warleigh, Bath. The Earl of Mount-Edgcumbe moved the adoption of the report. Mr. J. C. Moore Stevens, seconded the motion, which was carried unanimously. Sir J. Duckworth proposed Mr. Benyon as president for the ensuing year. Mr. Ramsden seconded the motion, which was adopted. Major Paget, M.P., moved that the gentlemen recom- mended by the Council to be appointed vice-presidents, and the gentlemen recommended by the Council for election to supply the vacancies occasioned by members retiring by rotation or otherwise should be elected members of the Council for a term of two years ensuing. Mr. AsHLET seconded the motion and it was carried. Thanks were then given to the Mayor of Bristol, the ex- Mayor, the Society of Merchant Venturers, the Chairman, Vice-Chairman, Hon. Secretary, and members of the Local Com- mittee, and the inhabitants of Bristol and neighbourhood generally " for the liberality which they have received and entertained the Council, and for their untiring zeal in en- deavouring to promote the success of the Bristol meeting ;" and further votes of tlianks to the judges and officers of the society. THE TRIAL OF IMPLEMENTS took place on Monday and Tuesday. The first tried were the mowers, and 14 machines were set to work in a field at Stoke, of more than a mile from the show-ground, where there were but i'ew spectators. The field was divided into 14 parts of about three quarters of an acre ; and tlie firms repre- sented were Samuelson and Co., Brenton, Picksley and Sims, Hornsby, Brigham, Johnston Harvester Company, Burgess THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. audKey, Howard, Osborne and Cc.Mattison, Baker, Harrison and McGreiJor, Wood and Williams. The reapers were set to work at Kingweston, on a field of rye, rather thin in parts, Amodgst those represented were Picksley and Sims, Brenton, Uornsby, Brigham and Co., Samuelson and Co., Johnston Harvester Company, Wood, Mattison, Williams, and Howard. The trial of steam ploughs and cultivators took place in a field adjoining the reaping, where Messrs. Howard, Fower, and Barford and Perkins, were the firms represented. Receipts. Admissions. Receipts. Monday 3,791 699 10 Tuesday 11,298 1,414 17 Wednesday 22,24.2 2,717 2 Thursday .■ 56,317 2,760 17 Triday 16,440 780 7 67 110,088 £8,872 14. 6 DEVON COUNTY AGRICULTUEAL ASSOCIATION. MEETING AT BARNSTAPLE. The meeting of this Society has beeu an undoubted success. There can be no mistake or doubt about it : most things have been favourable — scenery, situation, stock, and weather — and all folks have worked ^Yith a will to ensure this result. The one presiding idea of the neigh- bourhood, whether of landlord, tenant, or labourer, is the chase of the grand red deer over Exmoor in autumn and sly Reynard iu the wild-duck season ; and a right good chain of mutually correcting sympathy is it too ! There is not iu Suffolk over their auburn teams and Diamond pigs of Socratic visage a more kindred current of uniting interest than the art and recollection of venery supplies here ; and in a thorough esprit de corps the first elements of triumph are inheient, as the stamp of animal exhibited here to-day, and especially horse-flesh, suffi-cieutly indi- cates. Embosomed in the hollow of a real Devonshire valley we see the gay flags, tents, and shedding of the exhibition beneath us as we descend the rich grassy slope, and ^¥here our business is, within that enclosure of tall boards, to which the path lies through a garden and beside the fresh rushing current of the reservoir which supplies the town of Barnstaple. Blue policemen abound, and the ticket offices are duly arranged, but the officials are raw, and it takes longer than it need to arrive within, and there we find an appearance and a set-out that reminds one rather of the Bath and West of England gathering than a mere county show. There are the world-celebrated names of Hornsby, Ransome, and such- like, with tiny double ploughs adapted to the banks of the district- Here you are admonished by placard to " wash your linen," and there you are instructed how at once to wash and wring it. On one side a firm takes a bright and promising position with the blue and yellow stores which are warranted to force the growth of any mortal thing, but especially the cash store of the manu- facturer himself ; whilst upon a rival stand one studies a grand collection of tall cereals, an actual sugar-cane, and a cotton plant all tufted with the snowy material which runs one's thoughts back to the scenes of ' Uncle Tom's Cabin,' together with gigantic mangold bulbs, and heaps else that indicate the excellence of the stimulant set forth. Then there are waggons and ploughs and mowing machines, notably Wood's, who, false to his name, cow makes the frame of his implement of iron ; and whips and guns and harrows, and suchlike paraphernalia, until one gets finally pitchforked alongside the ring into which the animals are being led and where is the special sphere of our criticism. First enter a lordly array of really grand animals, the North Devon old bulls, comparatively small in size, but generally round and smooth as moles, though a few certainly have wide ungainly horns, a rhinoceros rump, and a disfiguring accumulation of fat about the tail, but as a rule they were wonderfully good and level. Their great weight made most of them walk delicately, but they had a very winning appearance notwithstanding, and the deep layer of juicy meat along the chine, loins, and quarter made one's mouth fairly water. The " Bulls above two and not exceeding three years old," were also very good. " Us didn't zee they afore, all prize bullocks bean't they ? " was a very fair criticism of the lot on the part of a lout who would keep enclosing one in a superfluous and odoriferous embrace against which, locked in as we were, it was useless to protest by any impatience of movement. How aggravating it was, too, to hear this fetid fellow take such trouble to invert the grammar of his cases 1 la the next class there were some thick and some narrow, and one very playful party. Amongst the ' Bulls not less than six, nor exceeding twelve months,' Mr. Walter Farthing's representative was lowand lengthy, and padded with mellow meat along his back, while the rest in this class showed a tendency to flatness of rib, which may disappear, however, with good keep and increasing age. One looked starved, and several were suffering from ringworm, which in a showyard should not be allowed. Amongst the aged cows there was a big one, with a taking head, a great promise of milk, and much style, but " she is cross-bred " the natives protest, which means that the expansive aptitude of the breed experienced the advan- tage of richer keep upon the meadows of Somersetshire than her sort taste usually amidst the heather of the hill-side. We are bound in fairness to remark, a great want of uni- formity iu the style of the heads of this class generally. Does this indicate tampering ? With their long-inherited type this should not be. With the representative of a minority the judging of the Devons seemed to go much on " the odd man out," and size certainly had all the best of it. The South Devon kine, much bigger and more uneven as they are than the North Devon, had yet quite a family facial likeness throughout, whereby they contrasted favourably with their northern cousins. In the next class of North Devons there were some right good heifers again. It is, in fact, a breed rich in exquisite specimens such as must be a source at once of profit and delight to the breeder. It is assuredly to the other cattle of our English sorts what the Southdown is to other sheep. In the next class Promise is very stylish to look at in the distance, but does not admit of equal praise upon closer acquaintance. The fortunate winner is inferior to second prize in character of head, but deliciously mellow to the touch, and solidly invested with rare meat upon the choice joints. So weighted is she in that enviable respect that she has grown close and rather close and narrow behind, as though in self- defence she had packed her feet so as best to sustain the weight above. The heifers not less than six, nor exceed- ing twelve months, are comparatively inferior to their elder relatives. Some, moreover, already show signs of overtraining in their "poor feet," and one was bellowing painfully as though suifering from incipient colic. The South Devon cattle are of a much larger stamp than the northern sorts, and consequently less taking to E 2 68 THE FARMER'S MAGAZmE. the eye, but very useful evidently both for plough and butcher. Next come the Shorthorns, and at their head Earl of Warwickshire III., a winner of last year at Plymouth and elsewhere. He is an upstanding bull, but wauts squareness of dewlap, and he looks a trifle short in the quarter, as he is the least possible volcanic about the tail. How much better would he have looked, too, arrayed in rich roan ! Jlessrs. Hoskens' second prize animal has a deal of Shorthorn style about him ; with good crops, rib, and dewlap, but he is unevenly developed in places. "With a few starved ex- ceptions the Shorthorn bulls were fairly represented in the several sections, and several Devon tenant-farmers state that they are stealing a cross from the shorthorn in their native herds, much to their satisfaction, too, only, as one intelligent breeder knowingly observed, "We don't give money enough for the sort we use." For increased size, with elegant grace and aristocratic style, let them try a small red one of the best descended Bates or Knightley tribes. Their cattle have already enough of the Booth tubular shape. Of course if they go to the outside con- glomerates of the Shorthorn, what is there for them to eipect in the results but what they have found— that is, something of all sorts, and nothing worth keeping ? The cider-soaking yokel was right in that remark. "Beauti- ful," admiringly observed a merry-looking matron to her comfortable spouse as the cows were led in, " but we could'nt keep them on our land, though the Torquay people like their meat too ! and how beautiful they're trained up, so docile, and they take the whip you see, dear things !" We charitably hope that Devon matons' dear things are not eipected to take the whip, but this apple-cheeked lady's words and tone were suggestive. Messrs. Hoskens' first prize cow walks well, is long and •legant, and greatly indebted to the mill, but not quite the A 1 animal of the Royal. Mr. Pollard's cow had in a certain degree more of the Shorthorn look about her, but is fairly placed second. In the heifers not eiceeding three years old class, Messrs. Hoskens exhibited a perfect gem — thick, mellow, tubular, and worthy of competition anywhere. It was a good class throughout. In class 23, Mr. Williams' long Lady Seymour had been allowed to lose her calf-flesh or she might have been a dangerous antagonist to the winners, which are both of compact if rather short figure, but remarkably well made up, especially the first prize. Mr. Digby's beautiful fawn- tinted Jersey cows appeared next, but for promise of milk we have seen these quite equalled amongst Bates and Knightley Shorthorns. Their excellence, however, lies in the butter pro luce. Some wretched Guernseys were shown, fresh impoited too. The sheep are reckoned a good lot. The winners are certainly broad-backed and symmetrical. What they term the South Devon, however, look diversely com- pounded of the Cotswold, Leicester, and Lincoln in various degree, built upon the indigenous animals (whatever that might be), but which is called the Barmpton breed, and comes from a small district near Exmoor. Some of this sort cut about 20 lb. of wool, but suffer propor- tionately in the quality of flesh. 14 to 16 lb. a good flock will average in the clip, we were informed by those who ought to know. The Dorset were well represented, as were the good-flavoured Exmoor, and the coarser Dart- moor, of flannel fame. There is a smart show of pigs, including white and black SuflTolks, Essex, Berkshire, Duckering's compounds, and the huge Salford masses of hog- flesh, which always make us wonder where they can be housed at home. There were besides a few native •pecimens which had gained the first dark dye of ad- vancing civilization, but have yet inquiring snouts of an ex- ceedingly aboriginal order, whi;h we cannot compli- ment. Amongst the cart-horses therj is a fine upstanding grey horse of Mr. Statter's breeding, somewhat light in carcase, but with much else to recommend him ; while there is an active, roundish, useful brown, and a white- maned animal called Suffolk, but which that county would not own. He is still of a useful sort to compound with the light mountain-side mares. The cart classes, upon tlie whole, are decidedly indilferent, especially the mares, which are most nondescript ; the winner having a good deal of gig-fashion about her, and calculated to breed well by a thoroughbred sire. Amongst the thorough- bred stallions Mr. Froude Dillon wins with a good-backed brown horse of unmistakable Touchstone character, and well calculated to put the rather loosely made proportions of the pack-mare together in their produce. He wants rather liberty of action, but is very pleasing in appearance as he stands. There is a Stockwell colt of some style, but slack over the back, and inclined to be leggy; as amongst the roadster stallions the first prize horse, of substantial and rich colour, trots well, but he would not shine in Norfolk or Yorkshire, though he has great power and mettle. The general character of the horses in this district was well represented. They have capital legs, and biggish feet, of use upon the swampy surface of Exmoor, with lots of power, but are, as a rule, too steep in the shoulder, and want yet one more infusion of blood. They are still of an active and very useful character. Mr. Cooke's first prize brood mare has plenty of size, and is clever- looking, but has apparently a little too much cart in her, a defect which her produce shows. The second prize mare, not so true made as the first, looks a huntsman's treasure all over for creeping through covert, or timber. There was a nice but small chesnut Blair ^^ thol thorough- bred in the lot, with an excellent foal at foot and plenty of action, as she is credited with several short races. The four-year-olds had a good corky mover at their head, which wanted something of their general substance, yet by his going indicated their common defect. One more removal from the pack-mare of local celebrity in the direction of racing is what the district horses want. Among the four-year-olds over 15 hands we preferred the second prize grey to the first prize chesnut, but the lot have a certain lack of quality and pace for the Shires, although doubtlsss clever enough for a bank country. Some of the yearlings showed an increase of quality, notably the second prize colt, a nice animal. The ponies were too mixed, consisting of all kinds, from the " soi'ty" Exmoor, so grand a foundation as it proves for the weight-carrier, as witness Major Barlow's Tregothnan, to the flashy Galloway weed. There were some good ponies included, of an intermediate cobby character, but the class should have been divided. Thg following is a list of the exibitors of implements taken by the numbers of the stands : John Fowler and Co., Steam Plough Works, Leeds ; Ran- somes, Sims, and Head, the Orwell Works, Ipswich ; \bbot, Bideford; Deuing and Co., Chard; Osborne and Co., Liver- pool ; Isaac, Braunton ; Samuel Barn, Milltown, Marwood ; Lancey, Barnstable ; Bell and Co., Oxford-street, London ; Kerr, Dublin ; Bradford and Co., London and Manchester ; Davies, Regent-street, London ; Beesley, Regent's-park, Lon- don ; Wrenford, Newport, Barnstaple; Brown and Co., Lon- don ; Huxtable, Ottery St. Mary and Honiton ; Van- stone, Buckland Filleigh ; Milford and Son, Thorverton, Devon; Huxtable, Bradford, Devon; Crump, Tewkesbury; Hornsby and Sou, Grantham ; W. A..Wood, Worship-street, Lon- don ; Samuelson and Co.,Oxon; Wright, Sandford, near Credi- ton ; Eddy, Kennford, Exeter ; Luxton and Co., Hatlierleigh ; Forbes, Regent's-park, London ; Silvester, Halton-road, London ; Goss, Plymouth; Fison, Ipswich; Greening, Westminster; Day, Son, and Hewitt, Loudon ; Tucker Bros., Ashburton ; Gray, Torquay ; Pettle, Barnstaple ; Beare, Son, and Co., New- THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 69 (on Abbot ; McDougall Bros., Mark-lane, London ; Bailey Bros., Chancery-lane, London ; Western Counties Manure Company, Devonport ; Gale, Joy-street, Barnstaple ; Tremeer, Square, Barnstaple ; Tipper, Birmingham \ Goulding, Dublin and Cork ; Parnell and Sons, Exeter and Bristol ; Brenton, St. German's, Cornwall ; Davey, St. German's ; Garton and King, Exeter ; Dicker, Chagford, Devon ; Turze, Uoldsworthy ; Ackland, Exeter ; Head, Wrightson, and Co., Stockton.on.Teei|; McGregor and Co., Leigh, Lancashire ; Moore, Filleigh, Soutlimolton ; Labbett and Son, Braunton ; Webber, Chaw- leigh, Devon ; Curson, South Zeal, Okehampton ; Wallis and Steevens, Basingstoke ; Marshall, Sons, and Co., Gainsborough; Eishley, Pottery, Eremington ; Matthews, Royal Pottery, Weston-Super-Mare ; Barford and Perkins, Peterborough. There was a trial of steam-ploughs on the Wednesday, in an eighteen-acre field more than a mile from the show-yard. North Devon farmers, while they are ready to acknowledge all the high merits of the steam- plough, where there is a flat, unbroken soil, are unanimous and emphatic in the declaration that it is unsuitable for the farms of this locality. However, a good field had been secured for the trial, and in it Fowler, of Leeds, and Barford and Perkins, of Peterborough, showed the utility of their implements, with six acres devoted to each firm. The trials of mowers took place in a field near the show yard. The crop of grass was very light and the bottom tough, which well tested the capability of the implements. The eihibitors who engaged in the trial were Samuel- son, Brenton, Wood and Co., Osborne and Co., Harrison, McGregor and Co. Several side self-delivery reaping machines were worked in a capital field of rye by the above-named exhibitors, and Dicker, of Chagford, worked a reaper with manual delivery. There were nine entries of ploughs, but only three came on the ground — Huxtable's single turn-wrest, Eddy's double-furrow, and Davey's Climax double-furrow. The ground to be dealt with was a very hard surfaced piece of hill-side, with a stifi' clay bottom. Of the three im- plements that came into the field only Davey's got to work, from the difficulties of the ground. The others would have worked, but the stewards thought the ground too bad to afford any thing like a fair trial. There can be no doubt that, as usual, these so-called trials without results, otherwise prizes, were a complete failure. PRIZE TTST JUDGES.— Cattl J: S. P. Newberry, Plympton ; G.May, Modbury; M. Savage, Chipping Norton. Horses: C. Gordon, Honiton ; G. Tucker, St. Germans; Rev. J. Rus- sell, Swymbridge. Sheep ; Leicester, Exaioor, Dorset Horn, and Somerfet, and Pigs ; R. Salter, Cullorapton ; H. Mayo, Dorchester ; J. Palmer, Crediton. South Devons, Dartmoor, and other Long-wools: T. Wills, Lustleigh ; J. Palmer, Bridestowe ; T. Cook, Tiverton. CATTLE. DEVONS. Bulls exceeding three years old. — First prize, W. Earthing, Stowey (Master Harry) ; second, J. Jackman, Hexworthy, Cornwall (Earl of Exeter) ; third, Mrs. M. Langdon, Flitton Barton, North Moltou (Duke of Flitton VHL). Highly com- mended : Viscount Falmouth, Tregothnan, Probus (King- craft). Bulls above two and not exceeding three years old. — First prize, W. Faithing (Master Robin) ; second, Mrs. M. Langdon (Duke of Fhtton X) ; third, J. Snow, Boode (The Czar). Bulls above one and not exceeding two years old. — First prize, J. Gould, BarapfyldeLodge,Exeter(Bampfylde); second, Mrs. M. Langdon (Duke of Plymouth) ; third, G. Turner, Brampford Speke (Duke of Edinburgh). Highly commended: W. Farthing (The Shah). Bulls not less than six nor exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, W. Farthing (Master Willie) ; second, Mrs. M. Langdon (Duke of Bedford). Commended : J. Gould, Bampfylde Lodge (Tempter IL). Cows exceeding three years old. — First prize, J. Bradbeer, Pyeland, Taunton (Beauty) ; second, W. Farthing (Milkmaid) ; third, J, Bradbeer (Nancy). Heifers ao exceeding three years old.— First prize, J. Harris, Bittadon House, Barnstaple (Curly) ; second, Mrs. M. Langdon (Temptress TIL) ; third, J. Jackman, Hexworthy (Fancy). Highly commended : W. May, Popham (Countess). Heifers not less than twelve months nor exceeding two years old. — First .'prize, W. Farthing (Duchess) ; second, W. May, Popham (Lady-bird) ; third, W. Perry, Alder (Camellia). Highly commended: D. Ridd, Chelpham Barton (Jenny). The whole class commended. Heifers not less than six nor exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, Mrs. M. Langdon (Actress VHL) ; second, J. Jackman (Tulip); third, G. Shapland, jun., Broadmeadow Cottage, Newport (Countess of Devon). Highly commended : J. Gould, Bampfylde Lodge, Exeter (Roaedale). SOUTH DEVONS. Bulls exceeding three years old. — First prize, J. Wroth, Coombe, Bigbnry (Baron) ; second, E. R. Cornish, Torr Farm, Mounts, Totnes (Sir Roger). Highly commended : J. and T. Irish, Poulston, Halwell, Totnes (Hercules). Bulls above two and not exceedmg three years old. — First prize, R. Trant, Elston, Churstow (King Coffee) ; second, G. Coaker, Old Newnhara, Plympton (Young Hero). Bulls above one and not exceeding two years old. — First prize, J. Wroth, Coombe, [Bigbury, Ivybridge (Forester) ; second, W. Coaker, Charleton Court, Kingsbridge (Viscount) ; third, G. S. Toms, Greenway, Brixham. Bulls not less than six nor exceeding twelve months old.— First prize, W. Coaker, Charleton Court, Kingsbridge (Admi- ral HI.) ; second, J. B. Oidreire, Little Dartmouth (The Czar). Highly commended: L. N. OlJreive, Landcombe, Dartmouth (May Duke). Cows exceeding three years. — First prize, W. Coaker, Charleton Court, Kingsbridge (Beauty) ; second, W. Coaker (Duchess) ; third, G. Dewdney, Higher Chaddlewood, Plymp- ton (Beauty). Highly commended : W. Coaker (Daisy). Class commended. Heifers not exceeding three years old. — First prize, W. Coaker (Lily) ; second, L. N. Oldreive, Landcombe, Dart- mouth (Minnehaha). Highly commended: W. Harvey, Frogmore Farm, Ashprington (Cherry). Heifers not less than twelve months nor exceeding two years old. — First prize, W. Coaker (Venus) ; second, W. Harvey (Nancy II ) ; third, ,G. Dewdney (Nelson). Highly com- mended : F. W. Coaker (Primrose). Class commended. Heifers not less than six nor exceeding twelve months old.— First prize, W. Harvey (Rose) ; second, W. Coaker (Violet). SHORTHORNS. Bulls exceeding three years. — First prize, J. W. Wilson, Austin House, Broadway, Worcester (Earl of Warwickshire III.) ; second, W. Hosken and Son, Loggan's Mill, H«yle, Cornwall (Duke of Oxford) ; third, J. Horswell, jun.. Burn's Hall, Lew Down (Oxford Duke I.). Highly commended: W. H. Hewett, Norton Court, Taunton (Crown Prince). Bulls above two and not exceeding three years. — First prize, W. U. Hewett (Tlie Claimant) ; second, J. Horswell, Exwick House, Exeter (Oxford Duke HI.) ; third, R. W. Pollard, Blagdon, Paignton (Duke of Oxford). Bulls above one and not exceeding two years. — First prize, W. H. Hewett (Saccharometer) ; second, J. Horswell, jun., Bnrn's Hall, Lew Down (Oxford Duke VIII.). Bulls not less than six nor exceeding twelve mouths. — Prize, C. Williams, Pilton House Barnstaple. Cows exceeding three years. — First prize, W. Hosken and Son, Loggan's Mill, Hayle (Countess of Oxford IL) ; second, R. W. Pollard, Blagdon, Paignton (Rose). Heifers not exceeding three years. — First prize, W. Hosken and Sou (Moss Rose II.) ; second, W. H. Hewett, Norton Court, Taunton (Fanny). Highly commended: W. H. Hewett (Elsie). Heifers not less than twelve months nor exceeding two years.— First prize, J. S. Bult, Dodhill, Taunton ; second. W. Hosken and Son (Kentish Girl) ; third, W. HorsweJ, Week, Milton Abbot, Tavistock (Oxford Coraetilla). Heifers not less than six nor exceeding twelve months. — First prize, R. W. Pollard, Blagdon, Paignton (Princess Jessie) ; second, D. R. Scratton, Og^ell, Newton Abbot (Artful). CHANNEL ISLANDS (jERSEl). Bulls exceeding oie year old on the 1st June, 1874;. — Prize, G. D. W. Digby, Sherborne Castle, Sherborne (Cow Boy) . 70 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. Cows exceeding three years old. — First prize, G. D. W. Digbv (Miss Edith) ; second, G. D. W. Digby (Queen of the Vale). Heifers not exceeding three years old. — First prize, G. D. W. Digby (Miss Augasta) ; second, G. D. W, Digby (Bessie). GUERNSEY. Bulls exceeding one year. — First prize, E. A. Sanders, Stoke House, Exeter (Prince Humbert) ; second, E. A. Sanders (Prince Amadeus). ; Cows exceeding three years old. — First prize, R. Rendle, Catel, Guernsey (Lady Jane) ; second, R. Eendle (Butter- cup). Heifers not exceeding three years old. — First prize, E. Andrew Sanders (Young Elegance) ; second, W. H. Walrond, New Court, Topsham (Daisy). SHEEP. LEICESTEKS, Yearling rams. — First and second prizes, J. Tremaine, Polsue, Grampound, Cornwall ; third and highly commended, J. Gonld, Bampfylde Lodge, Poltimore. Rams of any other age. — First prize. J. Tremaine ; second, T. Potter, Yellowford, Thorverton ; third, G. Turner, Bramp- ford Speke, Exeter. — The 'vhole class commended. Pens of five yearling ewes. — First prize, J. Gould; second, J. B. Torr, Westleigh House, near Bideford. Pens of five ewes of two years old and upwards, with their lambs. — First prize, J. B. Torr ; second, T. Potter. Highly commended : G. Copp, Hill Side, Tawstock. SOUTH DEVONS. Yearling rams. — First, second, and third prizes, J. Fair- weather, Malston, Sherford, Kingsbridge. Highly com- mended : E. R. Cornish, Torr, Mounts, Totnes. Commended : J. Stooke, East Sherford, Plympton. Rams of any other age. — First prize, J. S. Hallett, Sherford Barton, Plympton ; second, J. Badcock, Bearscombe, Kings- bridge, Commended : C. G. Mason, Ashprington Court, Totnes. Pens of five yearling ewes — First prize, J. Stooke ; second, J. S. Hallett. Commended : W. Harvey, Frogmore Farm, Ashprington. Pens of five ewes of two years old and upwards. — First prize, J. S. Hallett ; second, J. Stooke. Highly commended : W. C. Hodge, Pounds House, Weston Peverell. OTHER LONG-WOOLS. Yearling rams — First prize, R. Corner, Torweston, Wilii- ton, Somerset ; second. Sir J. Heathcoat-Amory, Bart-, M.P., Knightsliayes Court, Tiverton; third, R. Corner. Highly commended : Sir J. Heathcoat-Amory, Bart., M.P. Com- mended : R. Corner ; T. Radmore, Court Hayes, Thorverton. Rams of any other age. — First, second, and third prizes, R. Corner. Highly commended : J. Wheeler and Sous, Long Corapton, Shipston-on-Stour. Pens of five shearling ewes. — First prize, R. Corner ; second. Sir J. Heathcoat-Amory, Bt.; third, R. Corner. Highly commended : J. N. Franklin, Huxham. Commended : W. Leverton, Woolleigh Barton, Beaford. Pens of five ewes, of two years old and upwards, with their lambs. — First prize. Sir J. Heathcoat-Amory, Bt- ; second, J. N. Franklin. Highly commended : J. Trott, South Hill' Barton, Uffculme. Commended : T. Radmore. DJLRTMOORS. Yearling rams. — First prize, R. Palmer, Venn Barton, Ashbury, Northlew , second, third, and highly commended, J. Drew, Artiscombe, Tavistock. Rams of any other age. — First prize, J. Drew ; second, R. May, Grendon, Tavistock. Highly commended : T. Wil- ling, Wringworthy, Tavistock. Commended : J. Drew ; R. May. Pens of five yearling ewes. — First and second prizes, R. May. Commended: J.Drew. Pens of five ewes, of two years old and upwards. — First ant second prizes, R. May. Highly commended : J. Drew. EXMOOES. Yearling rams. — Second prize, P. Rock, Gratton Barton, Highbray. Rams of any other age.— First prize. Lord Poltimore ; second, C. Williams, Pilton House, Barnstaple ; third, W. Burden, Kerscott, Swimbridge, Barnstaple. Commended : J. Smyth, Bentwitchen Farm, Northoralton. Pens of five yearling ewes, — First and second prizes. — First and second prizes, Lord Poltimore ; third, E. Pasamore, Higher Fylton, Northraolton. — The whole class commended. Pens of five ewes, of two years old and upwards. — First prize, E. Passmore ; second. Lord Poltimore ; third and com- mended, T. Yeo, Dennington Barton, Swimbridge. The whole class commended. SOMERSET AKD DORSET HORNS. Yearling rams. — First and second prizes, H. Farthing, Nether Stowey, Bridgwater ; third. Viscount I5ridport, Home Farm, Cricket St. Thomas, Chard. Rams of any other age. — Second prize, H. Farthing. Pens of five yearling ewes. — First and second prizes, Vis- count Bridport. HORSES. FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES. Stallions foaled before the Ist of January, 1871. — First prize, J. Joce, Newport, Barnstaple (John Bull) ; second, G. E. Elliott, Monkirton, Pinhoe (Model) ; third, C. Brown, Middlezoy, Bridgwater (Protection). Stallions foaled on or after the 1st of January, 1871. — First prize, F. Quartley, Briraley, Southraolton (Clayball) ; second, G. Elliott, Swilley Farm, Plymouth (Young Dray- man) ; third, T. Buckingham, Landkey Tosvn (Petro). Mares in foal, or having a foal by her side. — First prize, R. Pethebridge, Ham, Barnstaple (Clydesdale mare and foal) ; second, N. Cook, Chevithorn Barton, Tiverton (Kealant) ; third, G. Lock, Instow Barton, Instow, Devon (Jessie). Fillies foaled in 1872. — First prize, J. Hexter, Moor Farm, Crediton; second, W. B. Pearse, Court Gates, Stoddiscombe (Juno) ; third, W. T. Hynam, Abbott's Marsh, Barrington, Chulmleigh. HACKS OR HUNTERS. Thoroughbred stallions suitable for getting hacks or hunt- ers.— Prize, J. F. Bellew, Stockleigh Court, Crediton (Hurst- bourne). Roadster stallions. — Prize, B. Giles, Penquit, Ivybridge (Cottager). Mares in foal, or having foals by their side. — First prize, N. Cook, Chevithorne Barton, Tiverton (Marygoldl.); second, T. Palmer and Sons, Borough, Kelly, Tavistock (Polly) ; third. Captain W. Arthur, R.N. (Mayday). Geldings or fillies foaled in 1870. — First prize, W. Trist, Langford Barton, Ugborough (The Baron) ; second, H. Ellis, Morebath, Tiverton (Baronet) ; third, R. Pethebridge, Ham, Barnstaple (Intrepid). Geldings or fillies, foaled in 1871. — First prize, E. G. Legg, Coombe Down, Beaminster, Dorset (Black Prince) ; second, W. Trist, Langford Barton, Ugborough (Sydenham) ; third, T. Palmer and Sons (Premier). Geldings or fillies, foaled in 1872. — First prize, W. Trist (Edinburgh) ; second, E. G. Legg (Rainbow) ; third, J. Heal, Parkiiam, Bideford (Hart). Colts, geldings, or fillies foaled in 1873. — First prize, N. Cook (Second Flight) ; second, F. Quartly, Brimley, South- inoulton (Starlight) ; third, G. Davey and Son, Plaistow Mills, Barnstaple (Prince Georgie). Mares or geldings, over four years old, exceeding 15 hands high. — First prize, W. A. Deane, Webbery, Bideford (Lorna) ; second, A. Gould, Blackheath, Exminster (Pattern Card) ; third. Rev. J. J. Chichester, Clovelly Rectory, 13ideford (Browu Stout). Highly commended: AV. Rookes, Baring House, Exeter (Prince). Mares or geldings, over four years old, not exceeding 15 hands high. — First prize, Pedrick and Price, Paris-street and Heavitree-road, Exeter (Perfection) ; second, J. Harper, Bear- street, Barnstaple (Bob) ; third, F. Quartly, Brimley, South- molton (Vesper). PONIES. Ponies of any age or ses under 14 hands high. — First prize» T. Radden, Plymouth (black-brown mare) ; second, A. E, Gould (Dandy) ; third, W. Rookes (Beauty). Commended; J. Parminter, Fullaford, Highbray, Barnstaple (Bob). PIGS. LARGE BREED. Boars not less than six months old. — First prize, J. Dove, Hambrook House, Hambrook, Bristol ; second, 11. E. Dacker- ing, Northorpe, Kirton Lindsey, Lincolnshire ; third, J, Wheeler and Sons, Long Compton, Shipston-oji-Stour. Comr mended: R, N. G. Baker, Heavitree, Eseter, THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 71 Sows of any age in farrow, or with their litters. — First prize, L. E. Duckering; second, Wheeler and Sons ; third, J. Dove. SMALL BREED (BLA.CK.). Boars not less than sis mouths. — First prize, Earl of Ports- mouth ; second, G. Turner, Braraford Speke, Exeter ; third. Earl of Portsmouth. Highly commended : J. Partridge, Hillerton House, Bow. Sows of any age, in farrow or with their litters. — First prize, J. Wheeler and Sou ; second and third. Earl of Portsmouth. Highly commended : Earl of Portsmouth. Commended ; Lord Clinton ; G. Copp, Hillside, Tawstock ; T. Fisher, Up- cott, Tawstock. SMALL BREED (WHITE). Boars not less than six months old. — First prize, J. Dove ; Highly commended : B,. E. Duckering. Sows of any age, in farrow or with their litters. — First prize, R. E. Duckering ; second, J. Dove, Hambrook House, Bristol, Highly commended : J. Dove. Commended : J. Wheeler and Sons. ADDITIONAL PRIZES. Pair of steers, of any breed, not exceeding three years old. — First prize, J. Horswell, jun.. Barn's Hall, Lew Down (Shorthorn steers) ; second, J. M. Ilartnoll, Lerwell, Chittle- hamptom, Southraolton (North Devon steers). Pair of North Devon steers, not exceeding three years old. — First prize, W. Shaplaud, Fyldon Barton, Northmolton ; second, T. K. Lock, Instow Barton, Instow, North Devon. North Devon cows in milk or in calf, bred by the exhibitor. — Prize, T. D. Ridd, Chelpham, Barton, Brattou Fleming, Devon (Lady Elizabeth). A special general meeting of the members of the Association was held in the Show-yard, Lord Poltimore presiding. The rneeting was called for the purpose of considering the expe- diency of altering the second Rule of the Association, states that " No exhibition of the Association shall be held in any year in which either the Royal or Bath and West of England Society may hold its meeting in the county," and Mr. Drew now proposed to add the following : " Unless the Council shall at the time see cause to determine otherwise, and any such meeting of tlie Royal or Bath and West of England Society so held in the county shall be considered as equiva- lent to the holding of a meeting of this Association in the particular division of the county in which it may have been eld." Mr. J. Tapp seconded the resolution. Mr. PoLLAKD moved as an amendment that the part of Rule 2 which prohibited their holding an annual meeting of the Association in any year in which either the Royal or Bath and West of England Societies held a meeting in the county, be struck out. Earl Devon pointed out that the effect of the alteration proposed by the resolution would be to place a discretionarj power in the hands of the Council. -Mr. Drew said the adoption of the amendment would be breaking faith with the other societies. Mr. ScRATTON seconded the amendment, as he believed their meeting, which would be held in advance of the others, would not injure the latter, and, if necessary, they could put their meeting forward a fortnight. Mr. Anstey said the amendment could not be put, as it affected the rules, and no notice had been given. The noble Chairman said that nothing but a negative amendment could be put to the meeting. The motion was then put to the meeting and carried by a large majority, two only voting against it. At the luncheon, Mr. Scratton counselled the estahlish- ment of a South Hams herd book. THE DEVON COUNTY SHOW. TO THE EDITOR OF THE MARK LANK EXPRESS. Sir, — Let me say one word on the dissatisfaction expressed by the exhibitors of North Devon cattle at this show. The Council doubtless intended to please every one by appointing a judge for each class of animals — viz.. Short- horns, South Hams Devons, and North Devons ; but, sir, when these three men of opposite views got to work, it was soon seen, especially in the North Devon classes, that the competition rested between " quantHy and qnalifi/," and as the third voice came from the Shorthorn judge, quantify had it ! However, as we breeders of North Devon are quality men, we shall happily meet the quantity men again next week at Bristol, and, thirdly, at the Royal, where quality with symmetrical proportions have proper respect paid them. Yours faithfully, An Exhibitor. [We have received another letter conveying precisely the same protest, as it does seem curious that " the Flittons" should have been put out as they were at Barnstaple. — Editor M.L.E.] THE ROYAL CORNWALL AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT ST. AUSTELL. The show-ground, about a mile from the town, was de- lightfully situated in a valley, surrounded by fine trees, whose shade added greatly to the comfort of the visitors, of whom upwards of 6,000 attended on the first day — a number far exceeding that of any previous first day. The management was all that could be desired, and reflects much credit on the secretary, the director, and the other officials. Of the opening classes of Devons, if some of these were numerically short, the quality in nearly every case was good, Mr. John Jackman beating Lord Falmouth in the old bull class, and taking the Cup as well for the best bull of any breed in the yard. Again, amongst the Devon heifers, which are very superior, Mr. Jackman's two- year-old is especially excellent, as also is Mr. Perry's year- ling and Mr. Jackman's calf. The Shorthorns were a good lot, and would, all classes considered, do credit to any county show in England ; indeed we shall be much surprised if some of these do not take a good deal of beating at the Bedford Royal. When we hear that some thirty-odd years back there was scarcely a Shorthorn in Cornwall, it speaks much for the energy of the farmers of the county that they are able to send such a lot of animals on to the show-ground. The first prize, however, goes to Mr. Wilson, of Worcestershire, for the well-known bull the Earl of Warwickshire ; the second prize is taken by Mr. Whit- ford for Earl of Fawsley, a half-brother of the first prize bull; and Messrs. Hosken are third with Townley Oxford. For bulls above two and under three years old, Messrs. Hosken's Duke of Oxford aud Mr. Horswell's bull met to fight their battles o'er again, with the same result as on former occasions, aud very good bulls they both are. Mr. Tregaskis wins with a very good bull- calf in a strong class of 16. Messrs. Hosken are first and second with their cows Alexandria and Countess of Oxford 2nd— the first far awaythe best ; as they also are first and second with their heifers Moss Rose 2nd and Lady Oxford ; while Moss Rose also takes the Cup as the best female in any class of cattle, aud a charming heifer she is. The Hoskens also take first prizes in the classes for heifers calved in 1872 and 1873. The Hereford classes were fairly filled, and tlio 72 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. breed is said to be increasing in favour in the county; but that Shorthorns are the most esteemed i» shown by there being 54 entries of Shorthorns, against 25 Herefords. The sheep are of more than average merit, but short in number. Mr. James Tremaine takes nearly all the prizes for Leicesters ; but in the shearling class the Barnstaple decision was reversed : his three-year-old ram, which takes first prize in the old class, is really a wonderful sheep. Mr. Tremaine's sheep struck us as being so much superior in their legs of mutton to the general run of Leicesters. The South Hams are a useful sheep, and the Dart- moors looked to pine for their native ground, and to dis- like the confinement they were subjected to. Lord Fal- mouth had some nice Shropshire Downs, with which he took all the prizes offered. Taken as a whole the horses may be said to be a good lot, but it is not to be wondered at that among so many there should be some inferior. In the old class of agricultural stallions there were six competitors, and the first prize, Excelsior, is a very nice brown horse belonging to Mr. H. Laity, and bred in Monmouthshire, and he ought to do some good in the West, where, however, they do not like a heavy horse for agricultural work, and amongst the young stock evidence of a cross with thoroughbred ones was easily seen. Two Clydesdales have been intro- duced lately, but they appeared to have very light middles and not the best feet ever seen. Amongst agricultural stallions foaled after January 1st, 1871, Mr. Hawkey takes first prize with a clever blue roan, two years old, beating Mr. W. R. Tobey's Sir Garnet, a three-year-old, without much character. The agricultural mares and foals were a very mixed lot, and some of them looking quite out of place with foals at foot by thoroughbred horses ; and the prizes went to the mares looking most caloJated to breed horses for agricultural purposes. Mr. E. James showed a very clever three-year-old mare, that looked fit for almost anything, and Mr. W. Mugbur had a second to her with a good top but too high on the leg. In this class was exhibited a grey gelding with Grey Castle as its sire, and nearly as high as a church steeple, just the reverse of what a horse should be. Mr. W. Trethewy showed a smart chesnut yearling filly which deserved the prize awarded. She looked full of Suffolk blood and would hold her own, we fancy, even in the home of the chesnuts. Mr. E. Stroker takes second prize for a useful colt, and Mr. J. King Martyn is third with a smart black or grey filly, as much like light harness work ; there were ten entries in this class, but scarcely two alike. Six thoroughbred stallions were entered and from the ring-side they looked a very good lot. Mr. H. Laity has a very handsome horse in Mouravieff, who in spite of his age wears very fresh and well, carries two good ends, has a deep middle, and goes remarkably well, with lots of free- dom in his shoulders, while he can still use his hind legs. The second prize horse, Eastley, has a very handsome top, ■with good middle, but is rather high and short, and he is deficient in action. Poor old Motley looked pretty fresh, but he has lost his action, and his prize-taking days are over ; and Garna, by King Tom, is but a flashy-looking one. The hunter mares and foals were a useful lot. Major Carlyon sending four out of the eight shown, and taking first and second prizes with two good mares, Mr. T. Hicks being third with a good sort of old grey mare. The class of the show was undoubtedly the three-year-old geldings and mares for hunting purposes, of which there were twelve entries ; while three prizes were given, two were highly commended, and the entire class commended. The first is a very strong bay mare that at first sight looked rather plain, but she is a fine mover, and improves on acquaintance. This mare belongs to Mr. J. Laity, and ■with luck looks like being a very valuable weight carrier the second prize horse of Mr. Chegwyn looks now more like harness than cross-country work, and the third prize, Miss Floretta, is full of quality, but rather light. One very handsome horse lost the prize on account of his hocks not looking quite the thing. There are not many counties that can produce such a class. The two-year- olds were a smart lot again. We preferred the second prize to the first, whose shoulders are too short, but he is a very smart-looking nag, and he moves well. The second prize one is a stronger animal, and looks more like carry- ing 14 stone to hounds, whilst the third is more of a park hack than a hunter. A very good-looking son of Mouravieff gets the prize as the best yearling, aud a thoroughbred one by Dundee is second, in whom Major Carlyon has a very promising horse ; whilst his filly by Blair Athol does not look worth half her sire's fee. There were twenty hunters not less than four years old, and here we cannot agree with thejudgesintheirfirstprizc horse ; it is true he looks equal to any weight, and he im- proves when set going, but a plainer one we have seldom seen. A very different sort is Mr. Jackman's bay mare, an eight-year-old " Irish hunter," with lots of sub- stance, good quality, and one that looks and goes like a hunter. Mr. Whitford's Jessie, a good-looking mare, is highly commended, as is also Mr. Grigg's Rallie by Rally wood. There are several animals shown in this class that were very useful ones, but not coming up to the required condition of being " weight-carriers." A Cup given for the hunter in this class to be tried over hurdles was well won by Mr. Jackman's bay mare already alluded to. There were some good performers ; but the " Irish hunter" proved herself a good one in her work as well as to look at. There were fourteen cobs and hacks not exceeding fourteen hands three inches in the next class, the first prize, a chesnut three-year-old mare be- longing to Mr. W. Grose, was good looking, with a nice top and shoulders, but when ridden she did not appear to have length enough before the saddle, and her hind legs were too far behind her. Mr. Silas Rickard took the second prize with a nice four-year-old, and Mr. Cardell was highly commended for a three-year-old, as Mr. H. W. Tremaine received the same compliment for an aged cob who has been a wonder in his day. There was a fair show of pigs, Mr. Jacob Dove, of Bristol, and Messrs. Wheeler and Duckerings taking most of the prizes. There was a small show of implements, the exhi- bitors of which stood thus in the catalogue: Brenton, Polbathic, St. Germans; Davey, Crofthole, St. Ger- mans ; Blamey aud Son, Truro and Liskeard ; Clemow and Co., St. Merryn, Padstow ; Front, Kelley, Lewanick ; Dray don, Helland Bridge; Wellington, Probus ; Mitchell and Son, Lelant, tlayle ; Hornsby and Son, Grantham ; Plimsaul Brothers, Plymouth ; Samuelson and Co., Ban- bury ; Wood, London ; Day, Son, and Hewitt, Dorset- street, London ; Marsden, Leeds ; Osborne and Co., St. Austell ; Clark, St. Austell; Oatey and Martyn, Wade- bridge ; Marshall Sons aud Co., Gainsborough ; Hearle and Sons, Gwarder, Penryu; Bradford and Co., High Holborn, London ; Crabb and Sons, Bodmin and Fal- mouth ; Ackland, Exeter ; Goss, Plymouth ; Jones, Aber- dare ; Singer and Company, Plymouth ; Murton, [Ply- mouth ; Bailey Brothers, Chancery-lane, London ; Myers, Navigation-road, York; Martyn, Wadebridge; Phillips and Co., Newton Abbot. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES. — Devons and Herefoeds : Mr. Powlesland, Stockley Pomeroy ; J. W. P. James, Mappowder Court, Dorchester. Shorthorns : C. Howard, Biddenliatn, Bed- fordshire ; J. Wood, Harewood Hill, Darlington. Jer- seys : Mr. Lisbriel, St. Neot. Sheep : W. Saudry, Rad- cliffe-oa-Trent, Nottingham ; E. Howard, Nocton Rise, Lincoln, Horses : Hacks, srid Hunters — H. Biddel| THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE 73 Playford, Ipswich ; T. Trist, Ugborough. Agricu tural horses : N. G. Barthropp, Great Yarroouth ; Mr. Stordy, Swinfen, Lichfield. Pigs : W. i\ Collier, VVoodtuvvn, Ilorrabridge. DEVO.NS. Bulls above three years old. — First priz«, J. Jackraaa, Hex- worthy (Perfection) ; second, Viscouat Falmouth, Tregothnan (Kingcraft) ; third, R. Knight. Bulls above two and not exceeding three years old. — Prize, Mr. Julyan, Creed (Sweet William). Bulla not exceeding two years old. — First prize, Mr. Julyan (Baronet) ; second, 11. Bickle, Lifton (Perfection) ; third, J. Smith, Kea (Earl Bothwell). Bulls not exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, E. H. Somer, Advent, Camelford (Young Kerscott) ; second, K. Bickle (Prince 2nd) ; third, J. Menhenick, Wadebridge (Harold), Cow in calf, or if in milk, having had a calf within six months. — First prize, Mr. Julyan (Bloomer) ; second, Mr. Julyan (Cherry) ; third, J. Treraaine, Polsue. Heifer in calf, or in milk, calved in 1871. — First prize, J. Jackman, Hexworthy ; second, Mr. Julyan (Famous); third, J. Tremayne. Heifer calved in 1873. — First prize, W. Perry, Lew Down, Devon (Champion); second, Mr. Julyan (Flora) ; third, J. Menhenick, Wadebridge (Diana). Heifer calved in 1873. — First prize, J. Jackraan ; second, J. Menhenick (Marie). Highly commended: W. Perry, Lew Down. SHORTHORNS. Bulls above three years old. — First prize, J. Wilson, Broad- way, Worcestershire ; second, W. Whitford, Trehane, St. Erme (Earl of Fansley); third, Hosken and Son, Hayle (Townley Oxford). Bulls above two and not exceeding three years old. — First prize, Hosken and Son (Duke of Oxford) ; second, J. Hors- well. Burns Hall, Lew Down ; third, J. Faull, Probus (Mer- cury). Bulls not exceeding two years old. — First prize, J. Thomas, Gerrans (Knight of Oxford) ; second, W. Horswell, Week Barton ; third, R. W. Pollard, Blagdon, Paignton (Duke of Oxford). Commended: Mr. Croggau, Creed (Rufus). Bulls not exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, Mr. Tregaskis, St. Issey ; second, J. Horswell, Burns Hall ; third, T. Blarney, Veryan (Marquis of Oxford). Commended : E. Stocker, jun., St. Mewan (Burngullow) ; G. Williams, Ruan- lanihorne (Kingscote). Cows in calf, or if in milk having had a calf within six months. — First prize, Hosken and Sou (Alexandria) ; second, Hosken and Sou (Couuless of Oxford 2nd) ; third, R. W. Pollard, Blagdon, Paignton (Rose). Commended: J. Gill, Probus. Heifers in calf or in milk, calved in 1871. — First prize, Hosken and Son (Moss Rose 2nd) ; second, Hosken and Son (Lady Cx'ord) ; third, Major Carlyon, Tregrehan, Par Station (Sweetbrier). Heifers calved in 1872. — First prize, Hosken and Son (Countess of Oxford 3rd) ; second, J. Horswell, Burns Hall, Lew Down. Heifers calved in 1873.— First prize, Hosken and Son (Ken- tish Girl) ; second, R. W. Pollard (Princess Oxford). Com- mended : Hosken and Son (Countess of Cornwall) ; J. Gill, Probus. HEREFORDS. Bulls above two years old. — First prize, G. Lobb, Lawhitton (Ostorius) ; second, J. Baron, Lanivet; third, R. Tucker, Prideaux Farm (Admiral). Bulls not exceeding two years old. — First prize, Mr. Haw- ken, St. Breward (King Koffee) ; second, J. Paull, Ruanlani- horne (Ganymede). Commended : G. Lobb, Lawhitton (Pa- triarch). Bulls not exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, R. Olver, Trescowe, Bodmin ; second, R. Olver, Penhallow. Cows in calf, or in milk, having had a calf witliin six months. — First prize, W. Grose, St. Kew ; second, J. Paull (Daisy). Highly commended: R. Olver, Trescowe. Cora- mended : R. Olver, Penhallow. Heifers in calf, or in milk, calved in 1871. — First prize, W. Grose ; second, W. Grose. Heifers calved in 1872. — First prize, W. Grose ; second, J. Paull. Commended : B,. Olver, Heifers calvtd in 1873.— First prize, J. Paull ; second, W. Grose. CHANNEL ISLAND BREED. Bulls not exceeding four years old. — Prize, Mr. Rendle, Ca'el Farm, Guernsey. Cows in calf, or if in milk, having had a calf within sis months. — First prize, Mr. Rendle; second, J. Tremayne, M. P.; third, J. Tremayne, M.P. Heifers in calf, or in milk, calved in 1871. — First prize, D. H. Sliilson, Trewhiddle, St. Austell; second, J. Tremayne ; third, T. Coode, Pond-dhu, St. Austell. SHEEP. Leicester yearling rams. — First, second, and third prizes, J. Tremain Polsue. Rams of any other age, — First prize, J. Tremain ; second, Mr. Rosewarne, Nanpiiska ; third, J. Tremain. Pen of five yearling ewes. — First and second prize, J. Tre- main ; third, Mr. Rosewarne. South Ham yearling rams. — First and second prize, J. Stooke, East Sherbord, Plympton; third, R. Cornish, Mounts, Tutnes. South Ham rams, of any other age. — First prize, R. D. Clemens, St. Keyne ; second, J. Moon, Penhale ; third, J. D.ver, Dobwalls, Liskeard. Pen of South Ham yearling ewes. — First prize, R. C. Clirke, St. Budeaux; second, J. Stooke; third, J. Moon, Penhale, Liskeard. Dartmoor yearling rams, to be shown in their wool. — First prize, R. Palmer, Venn Barton, Exbourne; second, J. Drew, Arliscombe, Tavistock, Dartmoor rams of any other age, to be shown in their wool. First prize, R. May, Grendon, Tavistock ; second, J. Drew, Pen of five Dartmoor yearling ewes, to be shown in their wool. — First and second prizes, R. May. Commended : J. Drew. Long-woolled yearling rams, not qualified to compete in the foregoing cl isses. — First prize, R. Corner Torweston, Somer- set; second, R. H. Marshall, Trenoon, St. Mowgan; third, II. H. Marshall. Long-woolled old rams. — First prize, Wheeler and Sons ; second, R. Corner, Torweston, Somerset ; third, R. Corner. Pen of five long-wolled yearling ewes. — F'irst and second prizes, R. Corner. Shropshire Down yearling rams. — First and second prizes, Viscount Falmouth. Shropshire Down old rams. — First and second prizes. Vis- count Falmouth. Pen of five Shropshire Down yearling ewes. — First and second prizes, Viscount F'almouth. HORSES. Agricultural stallions, foaled before 1st January, 1871. — First prize, H. Laity, Praze, Crowan (Excelsior) ; second. North Cornwall Stud Company (Bobby Burns . Agricultural stallions, foaled on or after Ist January, 1871, — First prize, Mr. Hawkey, St. Columb (Cornish Champion); second, W. R. Sobey, St. Veep (Sir Garnet). Agricultural mares and foals, or mares in foal. — First prize, J. Eglos, Merther (Tulip) ; second, J. Tremain, Polsue ; third, J. Robins, Withiel. Highly commended : C. 11. Gatley, Truro. Agricultural geldings or fillies, foaled in 1871. — First prize, E. J. Newly n ; second, W. Mugfur, St. Sampsons ; third, W. H. Tremaine, Newlyn. Agricultural geldings or fillies, foaled in 1872. — First prize, T. Blarney, Veryan ; second, Mr. Lark, Cornelly. Agricultural colts, geldings, or fiUies, foaled in 1873. — First prize, W. Trethewy, Probus; second, E. Stocker, jun., St. Mewan; third, J. King Martyn, St. Enoder. Highly commended : D. Cock, Roche. Thoroughbred stallions, foaled before 1st January, 1871. — First prize, H. Laity, Crowan (Mouravieff) ; second, J. R. Bickle, Lamerton (Eastley). Thoroughbred stallions, foaled on or after 1st January, 1871. — Prize, North Cornwall Stud Company (Pirate King). Hacks or hunters, mares and loals, or in foal.— First prize, Major Carlyon (Princess) ; second. Major Carlyon (Sweet Oil) ; third, S. Hicks, Bodmin (Jessie). Highly commended : W. H. Preston, St. Mewan. Geldings or fillies, foaled in 1871. — First prize, J. Laity, Goldsithney ; second, Mr. Chegwyn, Pool ; third, R. White, St. Jubt (Miss Floretta). 74 THE FAEMBR'S MAGAZINE. Geldings or fillies foaled in 1873.— Firs! prize, J. H. Grigg, Creed (Laddie) ; second, N. H. Hocking, Nansloe, Wendron ; third, W. Rowse, Bodmin. Colts, geldings, or fillies foaled in 1873.— First prize, E. J. Newlyn; second. Major Carlyon ; third, J. Tremain. Weight-carrying hunters, not less than four years old. — First prize, A. Brewer, Probus ; second, Wr. Jackman, Ply- mouth. Highly commended : 11. H. Hocking ; W. Whitford, Trehane, St. Erme (Jessie). Weight-carrying hunter, mare or gelding, to be tested over hurdles in the show yard. — Special prize, Silver cup, Mr. Jackmau. Cobs, mares, or geldings, not exceeding l-t hands 3 inches high. — First prize, W. Grose, Lanivet ; second, S. Rickard, Lower St. Columb. Mare or gelding cob, not exceeding 14 hands 3 inches high, to be tested over hurdles in the showyard. — Special prize, Silver Cup, W. H. Tremaine. Ponies, mares or geldings, not exceeding 13| hands high. — First prize, Mr. Jackman ; second, J. G. Hugo, Feock. Highly commended: Miss H. M. Tremaine, Heligan (Leotard); J. Levering, St. Austell. Mare or gelding pony, not exceeding 13^ hands high, to be tested over hurdles in the showyard. — Special prize, Silver Cup, R. NichoUs, Lostwithiel. Highly commended : J. Paull, Ruanlanihorne. PIGS. Boars, large breed. — First prize, J. Dove, Bristol ; second. Wheeler and Son, Long Compton. Commended : Mr. Ducker- ing, Northorpe, Kirton Lindsay. Breeding sows in farrows, or that have farrowed within sis months of the meeting. — First prize, J. Dove ; second, Wheeler and Sons. Higlily commended : Mr. Duckering. Pen of two breeding sows (of the same litter), not exceed- ing twelve months old. — Prize, Mr. Duckering. Small breed, boars exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, Mr. Duckering ; second, Wheeler and Sons ; third, W. Fenton, St. Mewan. Boars not exceeding twelve months old on the 1st June, 1874. — First prize, Mr. Duckering ; second, J . Dove ; third, J. Tremain. Highly commended : J. Tremain ;, JN. Reynolds, Creed. Commended : R. Knight, Lanivet ; J. Basset, Ken- wyn ; W. Trevenen, Crowan. Breeding sows in farrows, or that have farrowed within six raontlis of the meeting. — First prize, Mr. Duckering ; second, J. Dove; third, Wheeler and Sons. Highly commended: J. Dove. Commended : J. Tremain. Pen of two breeding sows (of the same litter), not exceeding twelve months old on the 1st June, 187-i. — First prize, J. Dove ; second, Wheeler and Sons ; third, J. S. Guy, Endellion. Highly commended : R. NichoUs. SPECIAL AWARDS. The best cow in the yard. — Mr. Jackman (Devon). Best bull. — Messrs. Hosken (Shorthorn). Best ram. — Mr. Tremain. Best pen cf ewes. — Mr. Tremain. Best pig. — Mr. Dove. THE OXFORDSHIRE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT WITNEY. This stow proved to be one of the most attractive meet- ings ever held by the County Society. It was a very gene- rally goodone, though the cattle were not the best section, but Mr. Penson's bull in the first class, and Mr. G. Game's cow, and Mr. Hewer's heifer, were as good as any in their respective classes as were ever shown at the Society's shows. The sheep were a large show, and the Duke of Marlborough's Ox- fordshire Downs were quite a show of themselves ; while Mr. Gillett's Cotswolds were also good. There was a good show of horses, much larger than ever exhibited in Oxfordshire ; but the two prizes for hunters went out of the county. JUDGES.— Cattle : C. Howard, Biddenham, Bedford; E. Little, Lanhill, Chippenham. Horses : T. Bulford, Hord- ley ; T. M. K. Elliott, Heathercote. Sheep and Pigs : J. Bryan, Northleigh ; R. J. Newton, Campsfield. CATTLE. The best horned animal in the yard, exhibited in either of the Classes 1 to 6. — A Silver Cup, of 5 gs., R. Peuson, Foxcote. Bull of two years old and upwards.— First prize, £7, R Penson ; second, £3, J. A. Mumford, Brill. Bull of one year and under two years old. — First prize, £,T, J. A. Mumford ; second, £3, H. Betteridge, East Hanney. Commended : J. Dodwell, Long Crendon, and A. T. Matthews, Hanborough. Bull-calf under one year old. — First prize, £7, G. Game, Churchill Heath ; second, £3, R. Penson. Commended : T. Hewer, Inglesham, and J. A. Mumford. Cow (having already produced one calf) in milk or in-calf, of three years old and upwards. — First prize, £7, G. Game ; second, £3, J. B. Jenkins, Kingston Bagpuze. Heifer in milk or in-calf, under three years[old — First prize, £7, J. A. Mumford ; second, £3, T. Hollis, Coggs. Heifer for breeding purposes, under two years old. — First prize, £7, T. Hewer; second, £3, J. A. Mumford. Com- mended: G. Game. Pair of cows in milk, of five years old and upwards.— First prize, £7, S. Smith, Somerton ; second, £3, G. Wallis, Old Shifford. Commended : J. Timms, Evenlode. For the best entry in Classes 7 or 8.— A Silver Cup or Plate, value i?10, S. Smith. HORSES. Mare for breeding hunters. — A silver Cup, of 5 gs., F. Dandriilge, Northcourt. Hunter, five years and upwards, being at least equal to 13 . stone weight, exhibited by a tenant-farmer. — A Silver Cup, of 5 gs., G. A. Lepper, Aylesbury. Hunter not over seven years. — A Silver Cup, of £10, G. A. Lepper. Highly commended : W. H. Fox, Bradwell Grove. Nag horse for general purposes. — First prize, £7, A. R. Howland, Thame. Highly commended : T. Akers, Burton Abbotts. Cart mare, with colt or to foal this season. — First prize, £7, T. Akers, Burton Abbotts ; second, £3, J. Hutt, Water Eaton. Highly commended : S. Davis, Woolashill. Cart gelding or filly, above two and under four years. — First prize, £7, J. Hitchman, Little Milton ; second, £3, to ditto. Highly commended : J. Hutt. Cart colt or filly, under two years. — Firstprize, £7,S. Busby, Curbridge ; second, £3, Mrs. Rowland, Shabbington. Highly commended : H. Barnett Glympton Park. Entire cart horse travelling in Oxfordshire or within 2 miles of Witney for the season of 187'4. — First prize, £7, W Coles, Long Crendon; second, £3, H. Woodbridge, Chimney. Highly commended : J. Hutt. SHEEP. Oxfordshire Down shearling ram. — First prize £7, Duke of Marlborough ; second. £3, A. F. M. Druce, Eynsham. Highly commended : G. Wallis ; commended : Duke of Marl- borough. Oxfordshire Down ram, above two years old. — First prize, £7, J. Tread well, Upper Wiuchendon ; second, £3, A. F. M. Druce. Highly commended : G. Wallis. Oxfordshire Down ram exhibited in classes 17 or 18 — Plate, value ^gs., J. Treadwell. Pen of five Oxfordshire shearling ewes. — First prize, £7, Duke of Marlborougii ; second, £3, G. Wallis. Highly com- mended : A. F. M. Druce. Commended : Z. W. Stilgoe, Ad- derbury. Pen of five breeding Oxfordshire Down ewes, with Iheir lambs. — First prize, £7, Duke of Marlborough ; second, £3, J, Treadwell. Commended : H. Gale, Cuddesdon, THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 75 Pen of five Oxfordshire Down sliearlin^ wethers. — first prize, plate, value 5gs., Sir H. Dashwood, Bart., Kirtlington Park ; sejond, £3, Z. W. Stilgoe. Long-woolled shearline; ram.— I'irst prize, £7, T. and S. G. Gillett, Kilkenny; second, £3, ditto. Highly commended : S. Smith. LoDg-woolled ram, above two years old. — first prize, £7. S. Smith ; second, £3, T. and S. G. Gillett. Pen of five long-woolled shearling ewes, First prize, £7, T. and S. G. Gillett ; second, £3, ditto. Pen of five long-woolled breeding ewes, with their lambs. — First prize. £7, T. and S. Gillett ; second, £3, ditto. Pen of iO stock ewes of any one breed, the bona fide pro- perty of the exhibitor, which shall have bred and brought up lambs on his farm. A Silver Cup, value £30, Duke of Marl- borough. Commended : C. Gillett, Lower Haddoii, and T. and S. G. Gillett. Pen of teu Oxfordshire Down ram lambs. A Silver Cup, value £5, G. Adams, Faringdon. Highly commended : W. S. Hunt, Fawler. Pen often Oxfordshire Down ewe lambs. A Silver Cup, value £5, W. S. Hunt. Highly commended: Mrs. Pratt, Little Haseley. Pen of ten long-woolled ram lambs. A Silver Cup, value £5, E. Tombs, Shilton. Highly commended : C. Gillett. Pen of ten long-woolled ewe lambs. — A Silver Cup, value £5, E. Tombs. PIGS. Boar not exceeding 16 months old.— First prize, £7, A. C. Baily, Swindon ; second, £3, J. Dove, Bristol. Highly com- mended : H. Humpfrey, Shrivenham. Commended : Ditto. Boar exhibited in class 31.— Plate, value Sgs., A. C. Baily. Sow in farrow or with pigs.— First prize, £7, H. Hum- frey ; second, £3, ditto. Highly commended : J. Dove Pen of five breeding pigs of one litter, not exceeding sis montiis.— First prize, £7, H. Humfrey ; second, £3, J. Druce, Eynsham. Commended : J. Dove. Beast, slieep, or pig, for consumption, brought to earliest maturity,syrametry and quality being considered.— A Silver Cup or Plate, value 5gs., E. W. Harcourt, Nuneham Park. Best jumper of a wall, water jump, timber fence, hedge and ditcli.— A Cup, value £20, J. Hutt. Shoeing a saddle horse— First prize,£3, E. Glanville, Oxford ; second, &i, A. Ballard, Longworth. Shoeing of a cart horse — .First prize, £3, C. Wiggins, Wit- ney ; second, £^, W. Jackson, sen., Witney. THE CAMBRIDGESHIRE AND ISLE OF ELY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT NEWMARKET. In the first instance it was resolved that, in conse- quence of the Royal Agricultural Society visiting Bedford this year, the county show should be abandoned; but it was subsequently determined that the meeting should be held as usual. Under the circumstances there was a great falling off, and the attendance was very limited. At the luncheon, Mr. C. W. Townley, the chairman, said there were not so many things exhibited as might have been expected, but the quality came up very well. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES. — Cart Horses : J. Manning, Orlingbury, Wellingborough ; T. Plowright,juu., Pinchbeck, Lincoln. Nag Horses : J. E. Bennett, Husband's Bosworth, Rugby ; T. M. K. Elliott, Heatiiencote, Towcester. Cattle : C. Howard, Biddeniiam ; J. Lynn, Stroxton, Grantham. Lo^'G- WOOLLED SiiEEr AND PiGS : J. H. Casswcll, Laughton, Jrolkingham; H.Dudding, Wragby, Lincoln. Short- woolled AND Cross-bred Sueep : T. Fulcher, Elmham, Dereham ; J. Treadwell, Upper Winchendon, Aylesbury. Implements : M. Cooke, Ely ; ^J. Martin, Littleport. Butter and Cheese : G. Decks, Newmarket ; M. Hilton, Newmarket. HORSES. AGRICULTURAL. Stallion. — First prize, J. Martin, Littleport; second, H. Stanley, Bury St. Edmunds. Entire three years old colt. — First pri^e, T. Briggs, Babra- ham ; second, H. Cockle, Hilrow. Entire two years old colt. — First prize, G. E. Daintree, Fenton ; second, J. Martin. Cart mare, not under four years old. — First prize, C. Am- brose, Stuntney ; second, H. Lambert, Abington Park. Mare and foal. — First prize, C. Ambrose ; second, F. G. Robins, Isleham. Two years old filly. — First prize, C. Ambrose ; second, T. H. Vergette, Borougli Fen, Peterborough. Yearling colt or filly. — First prize, J. Coy, Decoy Farm, near Mildenhall; second, B. W- Grounds, jun., Whittlesey. Plough team. — First prize, E. Staples, Esuing; second, J. Crisp, Stow-cum-Quy, Dray horse — First prize, T. Gardner ; second, J. S. Nunn. Cart foal. — First prize, J. Martin ; second, C. Ambrose. Entire horse for agricultural purposes. — Prize, a cup, value £20, J, Martin. RIDING AND COACHING. Stallion calculated to get weight-carrying hunters. — Prize, T. Smith, Bansted Manor. Hackney stallion. — First prize, W. Giddens, Walpole ; second, C. Groucock, Newmarl^et, Hackney mare or gelding. — First prize, W. Giddens ; second F. W. Lilley, Granchester. Hunter of any age. — Prize, G. S. Hall, Ely. Carriage horse, not entered for any other premium. — First prize, W. R. Cockle, Hilrow. Hackney mare or gelding, not exceeding 15 hands high, not entered for any other premium. — Prize, T. Banyard, Horn- ingsea. Hackney mare or gelding, not exceedig li hands, not entered in premium 24. — A cup value £10, W. R. Cockle, llilrow. Riding cob, not exceeding 14 hands 2 inches, and not under 13 hands 2 inches. — Prize, F. W. Lilley, Granchester. Pony under 13 hands 2 inches.— Prize, W. F. Saberton, Wilbutton. Yearling colt or filly got by " Little Pippin." — Prize, H. Stanley, Bury St. Edmund's. Thoroughbred mare and foal. — First prize, T. Jennings, Newmarket ; second, S. Smith, Bansted Manor. Thoroughbred stallion, calculated to get hunters, open to serve half-bred mares, within the limits of the Society. — Prize, Earl of Stamford and Warrington. CATTLE. Bull not exceeding two years. — First prize. Lord Bray- brooke, Audley End; second, H. Porter, Haddenham. Bull not exceeding one year. — First prize. Lady Pigot, Newmarket ; second, T. Banyard, Horuingsea. Cow in calf or in milk. — First prize, T. Jennings, New- raaiket ; second, C. Ambrose, Stuntney. Heifer not exceeding three years. — Prize, Lady Pigot. Heifer not exceeding two years. — First prize, Lady Pigot ; second, C. Ambrose. Heifer not exceeding one year. — First prize. Lady Pigot ; second, C. Daintree, Fentor . Alderney and Guernsey cow in calf or in milk. — First prize, W. Gilbey, Hargrave Park ; second, J. Dawson, Newmarket, Shorthorn bull of any age. — Prize, C. Beart, Stow, Down- ham Market. Best bull in the yard. — Prize, C. Beart. Bull, cow, and offspring. — Prize, G. Jonas, Ickleton. SHEEP. Shearling Leicester or Lincoln ram. — First and second prizes, T. Gunnell, Milton. Pen of five Leicester or Lincoln ram-lambs. — First prize, F. AUwood, Wals worth ; second, F. Ellis, Chesterton. Pen of five Leicester or Lincoln ewes, each certified to hare brought up a lamb this year. — First prize, T. Gunnell ; second, F. AUwood. Pen of five shearling Leicester or Lincoln ewes, — First and Second prizes, T, Qunnell, 76 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. Pen of five Leicester or Lincola ewe-lambs. — First and second prizes, F. Ellis. Shearling Southdown ram. — First and second prizes, Lord Braybrooke. Pen of five Southdown ram-lambs. — Prize, F. M. Jonas, Chrishall Grange. Pen of five Southdown ewes, each certified to have brought up a lamb this year. — First prize, F. M. Jonas ; second, G. Jonas. Pen of five shearlinfc Southdown ewes. — First prize, G. Jonas ; second, F. M. Jonas. Pen of five Southdown ewe-lambs. — First prize, F. M. Jonas; second, G. Jonas. Peu of five short-wooUed fat shearling wethers. — Prize, G. Cooke, Horseheath Park. Shearling short-wooUed ram, not Southdown. — First prize, G. Cooke; second, F. Street, Bedford. Pen of five short-wooUed ram-lambs, not Southdowns.— First prize, G, Cooke ; second, F. Street. Pen of five short-woolled ewes, each certified to have brought up a lamb tliis year, not Southdown. — First prize, G. Cooke ; second, F. Street. Pea of five shearling short-woolled ewes, not Southdowns. —First prize, G. Cooke ; second, F. Street. Pen of five shortwoolled ewe lambs, not Southdowns. — First prize, H. Lambert, Abington Park ; second, G. Cooke. Pen of five cross-bred lambs. — First prize, T. llush, Babra- ham; second, W. Baker, Stapleford. Pen of five half-bred fat shearling wethers. — First prize, W. J. Waters, Babraham. Southdown ram, — First prize. Lord Braybrooke ; second, G. Jonas, Ickleton. Pen of five cross-bred or half-bred ewe lambs. — First prize, T. Rush, Babraham ; second, R. Musk, Dullinghara. Pen of five cross-bred or half-bred ram lambs. — First prize, T. Rush, Babraham ; second, W. Baker, Blackfaced Suffolk ram.— First prize, J. M. Green, Stradis- hall Place. Shearling blackfaced Suffolk ram. — First prize, J. M. Green ; second. Lord G. Manners, M.P., Cheveley Park; third, W. S. Gardner, Moulton. Pen of five shearling blackfaced Suffolk ewes. — First prize, Lord G. Manners, M.P. ; second, W. S. Gardner ; third, E. Staples, Exning. Pen of five blackfaced Suffolk ewes, each certified to have brought up a lamb this year. — First priie,E. Staples ; second, W. S. Gardner. Pen of five blackfaced Suffolk ewe lambs. — First prize, H. Northern, Moulton ; second. Lord G. Manners, M.P. Pen of five blackfaced Suffolk ram lambs. — First prize. Lord G. Manners, M.P.; second, J. S. Green ; third, H. Northern. PIGS. Boar, large breed. — First and second prizes, H. A, Kilham, Tydd St. Mary. Boar, small breed. — First and second prizes, H. A. Kilham, Sow, in pig or suckling, large breed. — First^prize, H. A. Kilham. Sow, in pig or suckling, small breed. — First prize, H. A. Kilham ; second, J. P. Fison, Teversham. Pen of three sow pigs, not sis months old, large breed.— First prize, H. A. Kilham. Pen of three sow pigs, not sis months old, small breed.— First prize, H. A. Kilham. IMPLEMENTS. Collection of agricultural implements. — First prize. Ran- somes, Sims, and Head, Orwell Works, Ipswich. BUTTER. Three pounds of butter, in single pounds, the exhibitor being an owner or occupier of land. — First prize, R. White, Soham ; second, T. Jennings, Newmarket. THE HORSE SHOW AT THE AGRICULTURAL HALL, ISLINGTON. Those great judges of form, the tight-lacing young ladies who set about correcting nature's loveliest work, often find when they have nearly accomplished the feat, as Abernethy said, of getting the contents of a quart-pot into a pint, that Dame Nature starts for them a danger signal in the shape of a jolly red nose. Now we do not say the manager of the Agricultural Hall ever accom- plished the quart-pot and pint feat, but he is evidently aware that nature must give way to art if too tightly pinched ; and this year it was given out that he was going to start a danger signal — not a jolly nose, but a ther- mometer. This is a step in the right direction, as a thermometer is a correct reporter if not supplied with iced champagne, as then it might err, like some other rsporters, who actually gave the credit of managing a horse show to one who acted the parts of bottle-holder, head-waiter, messenger, and cock chambermaid, and who knew as much about a horse show, and had as much to do with it, as Maria Martin or jthe Red Barn. But though we failed to find the thermometer, we found the hall as clean and as sweet as ever, and comparatively cool to the scorching heat in the paddock on Epsom Downs, and, to give the Secretary his due, everything was well done at " the greatest horse show in the world," which must be all the world to him, as we happen to have wit- nessed a few of the small ones, one where there were 460 stallions, including West Australian : So have I lieard on Afric'i burning shore Another lion give a grifvous roar, And the fir«t lion thought the last a bore. About ten o'clock we found Lord Waterford, Sir George Wombwell, and Colonel Luttrell, who aclcd for Mr. John Musters, who had met with an accident when trying a horse some days ago ; while Mr. Phillips, of Knightsbridge, the well-known dealer, after being an absentee for fifteen months through a broken leg from a kick, was to be seen supported by a couple of friends which he told ns once did service for the Honourable Robert Grimston well-known in the Vale. Then Mr. A. H. Billington, who has three or four nice horses in the yard, has not quite re- covered of an arm broken in two places and a severe kick on the ankls. "With this we must conclude the chapter of accidents, although we nearly had another when Honey- comb, a well-known show nag, while cantering round the ring, stepped in a hole and came down plump on his rider's leg. "There's another fall in beef!" we ejacula- ted at the moment, which so startled an agricultural friend, deep in the morning paper, that with anxiety iu his face, he cried " 0 drahbit it ! You don't say so !" But we must return to the ring, where we find forms familiar to the eye, while some of the judges act so fre- quently that surely they give more than a fair share of these fanciful verdicts, which, after all, as Mr. Hawkins remarked of the evidence of the noble army of Carabineers when they had all been brought up and one after the other said on oath in conrident tones. That's him, " My Lord, all this i% but opinion after all," and with three or four facts the learned Q.C. routed the regiment." As one gallop across a fair hunting country for a cup or two at the end of the show season of each year would set at rest all difiFerences of opinion as to which was the best of the show nags up to a certain weight, and keep an impostor fit for nothing but|the ring out of it. Then there are bipeds who will enter where angels dare not tread, and who, when they see the orderly throng standing round, set the common decencies and rules of a horse show at defiance by trying to thrust themselves into the riug on the strength of knowing an official or a judge — as if they and only they knew an official or a judge. We put the great I'HE FAPaiEE'S MAGAZINE. 77 men first for repulsing several and doing their duty. Barring numbers of nondescript animals, whose like we nerer wish to look upon again, the show of horses is good, for there are many deep-framed, good-ended, nice-limbed, free-stepping, hunting-like horses ; a few for the ladies, and several for the youngsters, ss well as a goodly lot of well made quick-stepping roadsters and fashionable grand-moTing park hacks ; while nearly all the prize horses of any note are among them, which go the round of the shows like a travelling circus, so that what you see at one place you meet wi^h at another. Then there are roadster, but no thorough-bred stallions, harness horses in pairs and tandems, polo ponies, and people continually asking when the jumping will begin. Is it not lament;ible that a ft-w five-pound notes laid out to encourage owners of hacks to jump them, and a little water to make a splash, is a greater attraction to the cockney and paying multitude than the finest shaped horses that a thousand pounds in prizes will bring together ? But how can we expect peojde to appreciate a hunter who never saw a honnd P It takes about three minutes to run the Deiby course, and say at the outside a minute and a half to hoist the 1, 2, 3, while the sii-and-twenty horses in the weight- carrying hunters up to not less than fifteen stone took the judges exactly two hours by the clock to place. The first is the compact, stout-built Palraerston, a great prize- taker last year, with limbs well placed, and a quick, sharp goer, but evidently not showing to his best m the Hall. The second, Iron King, is a rather soft-looking bay, but a useful horse with good action ; while Chief Constable, a taker of several prizes as a four-year-old last year, was much fancied by many, and takes third honours. He has fiued a great deal, and now shows more of the blood of his ■ire, Theobald, a sou of Stockvvell, and makes good use of his iron-looking legs, bringing the hind ones well under him. Behind him is th« lighter-made Grandmaster of Mr. Holmes ; Lucifer, a fine powerful brovTU of Mr. Billington's ; Waverley, a blood-like nag of Mr. Percival's ; Earl Spencer's imperor ; Mr. Ilay- ward's Sir Isaac Newton ; Mr. Tattersall ilus- prave's Honeycomb, often described in this paper; Mr. G. Bland's Conrad and Gem of the Peak. A hall-bred stallion entered in the roadsters also figured iu this class, and one year, at Birmingham, actually took a thorough- bred stallion prize, and again beat several more thorough- breds another year, but was disqualified as not to be found in the stud book. He never struck us as a thoroughbred, and is not the first half-bred that has carried off a thorough- bred stallion prize. The hunters without condition as to •weight were a very good class, mustering over fifty, inclu- ding the vrell-known Banker, who is now in his prime, and to whom we have always stuck to from a two-year-old. Then Iron King, a second prize in the weight carriers, takes the same honours here, but is disqualified because he has already taken a hunting prize, which let in Mr. Trueman Mill's well-known bloodlike chesnut Ruby, and a good goer ; but as he does not give a satisfactory account of himself, Mr. Harvey Bayly's Newsmongei comes in for second honours, a horse which was second to Landmark at Malton one year, and now thickened into a compact clever-looking one, and as sound as the day he was foaled, and Digby Grand, a good moving, rather light-backed sou of old Orpheus, for third honours, while Mr. Goodlifie's Marshal MacMahon, invincible as a two-year-old, takes the fourth place. Mr. Billington's Caradoc was much fancied by the judges. Mr. Jewison's Freddy was neat and could go, as could Major Chaplin's hog-maned Singalee, while Dolly Varden, of Wansford, looked like flying with a light weight; and Captain Heygate, a breeder of hunters, has in Sir Hercules a neat one that will bear looking into, and will be Sold at the Captain's fifth annual sale at Tattersall's on the 22nd June. Some of the others we noticed were the Earl of Rosebery's The Boy, Mr. Newcomeu's Kismet, Mr. Battam's King of Trumps, Mr. Parry's Mrs. Borrodale, Mr. Sanday's Sil- vertail, Mr. Linnell's Czaravina, and Mr. Lepper's Calico The four-year-old class was good, and mustered over thirty strong, headed by Cashier, a fine looking horse, and an oily goer of great character, who was afterwards awarded the Cup for the best hunter in all the classes ; and darkness coming on, we had no tims for ^ close inspection. Among the four - year - olds he beats was Prize- taker, a first prize three-year-old wheu he was nowhere ; the Showman, a very good-looking one from Hull, not unknown in the ring, but which did not show so well iu the saddle as when we have seen him lead at Driffield, Malton, Hull, &c. Nor had Lieut. -Colonel Barlow's Cornisbman.a rather gentlemanly horse, got quite used to the saddle and the Ilall, a horse we saw take prizes at Hull and Gainsborouii;h last year. Mr. Mills' Reindeer and Captain Ileygate's Constable were nice horses, and some more which we have not time to notice. The second four-year-old, Sedgwick, was light and shelly, and not much to look at. In the hunters uuder 15 hands 2in. out of the twenty-one or two there were a few nice ones, but the tug of war laid betireen Sir George Womb well's Miss Sykes, a very bloodlike, hand- some mare, and good goer, and Mr. Harvey Biii cy's thickset, nicely-built Enterinise, as strong as a tower, with grand actiou, and legs well under him. Sir George retired, and Lord Shannon took his place, the verdict being in favour of Enterprise, which was then not half shown in the covert hacks and roadsters not exceeding fifteen two, as he is a wonderfully fine trotter, and was beateu by Norma, a fast stepping cob, kejit at her best pace the whole time. The third was Cori-ande, of good form and action ; while Filbert, one of the neatest of cobs, with grand action, if not lasting, came iu for a commendation. The liding horses of any height, exceeding fifteen two, as a lot were poor. Iiiniskilliner could move well, and so could Brunette stylishly; while on Cooinassie we should not like to libk a rather bald crown. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES. HUNTERS. Lord Waterford. Sir George Wombwell. Colonel Luttrell. KIDING HORSES. The Marquis of Waterford. The Earl of Shannon. Sir George Wombwell. COVER HACKS AND EOADSTBRS. Lord Shannon. Colonel Kingscote. Colonel Maude. Weight carriers up to IB stone. — First prize, £60, H. Jewison, Raisthorp, York (Palmerston) ; second, £30, R. Hutton, Gloucester-place (Iron King) ; third, £20, T. Harvey Bayly, Ollerton (Chief Constable). Without condition as to weight. — First prize, £00, W. Armstrong, Kendal (The Banker) ; second, £25, T. Harvey D. Bayly (Newsmonger) ; third, £13, A. Ken- nard. May Fair (Digby Grand) ; fourth, £10, J. Good- liffe, Huntingdon (Marshal McMahon). Four years old. — First prize, £50, W. Armstrong (Cashier) ; second, £25, T. H. Ashtou, Worcester (Sedg- wick). Not exceeding 15 hands 2 inches high. — First prize, £40, T. Harvey D. Bayly (Enterprise); second, £20^ 78 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE [Lord Shanuon judged Sir G. Wombwell (Miss Sykes) iu this class.] EIDING HORSES. Exceeding 13 hands 2 inches high. — First prize, £20, G. Hcaviside, Dublin Castle (Inniskillener) ; second, £10, Smith and Sanday, Nottingham (Brunette) ; third, £5, H.R.II. The Prince of Wales (Coomassie). COVER HACKS AND EOADSTEES. Not exceeding 15 hands 2 inches high. — First prize, £20, R. E. D. Poucy, Kensington (Norma) ; second, £10, T. Harvey Bayly (Enterprise) ; third, £8, R. Nelson, Barton, York (Corisande). Commended : II. Frisby, Buckingham-gate, Filbert. PARK HACKS AND LADIES HORSES. Not exceeding 15 hands 2 inches high. — First prize, £20, Mrs. Frisby (Lady Adelaide) ; second, £10, Sir George Wombwell's (Miss Sykes) ; third, £5, A. C. Kennard, Eaton-place (Sunshine). STOCK SALES. SALE OF SHORTHORNS AT BLIS WORTH, On Friday, Mat 22nd, 1874. BY MR. THORNTON. Blisworth is a convenient centre on the London and North Western Railway for the Northamptonshire and Warwickshire farmers ; and as the Rev. John Storer's herd at Hellidon, near Daventry, some fourteen miles away, had outgrown the small farm, he sent forward three-and-twenty of his animals for sale at George Savage's farm, adjoining the canal, and scarcely five minutes' walk from the station. Mr. Waldo, whose herd in Kent is of somewhat similar blood, wishing to dispose of two or three tribes, contributed eleven bead, and these, with three bulls from Mr. C. C. Dormer, and a few odd lots, mustered sufficient for a sale. The situation may have helped it ; but doubtless the blood had more attraction, for we have not seeu this year so large and influential a company as surrounded the ring at half-past one. Yorkshire was well represented by Mr. Booth, Mr. Pickersgill, and others ; Lincoln, by Messrs. Dudding, Pears, Paddison, and Garfit ; the Rev. Thomas Staniforth and Mr. Jacob Fair hailed with seve- ral others from Lancashire; while Cumberland and Nor- thumberland had representatives ; and Mr. Crosbie came from Ireland, and Mr. Deaus and Mr. Easton from Scot- land. Even distant Wales is now affording a home for the Shorthorn, and Mr. Pugh took one of the handsomest lots into Carmarthenshire. The place is well adapted for a sale. There is a large, open straw-yard, surrounded with houses and loose-boxes, so that from fifty to sixty head could be well accommo- dated, and an adjoining field makes a good place for the ring, to say nothing of the easy delivery to the station, and absence of any town or crowded dwellings. The very thing, however, acts somewhat against the stock. The cattle we heard had been wisely put up there since Mon- day and Tuesday, but notwithstanding this things never will show in that bloom, or with that contented look, as in their own pastures and houses. The pedi- grees read attractively ; the catalogue opening with Anna 3rd (Rev. J. Storer), a large, good red and white cow, with a fine Shorthorn head and character. Although she had a very fair red yearling in the catalogue, lot 18, she laboured under the disadvantage of having calved at seven months, still looking fresh and healthy and unbuUed ; she went slowly along until Mr. Blackwell, of Nottingham- shire, secured her at 85 gs. Her heifer was the most attractive female, especially as her two sisters had made in 1872 respectively 105 and 190 gs. each. Moreover, she was unbulled, and, by the way, the unsatisfactory slate of many of the lots had doubtless a damaging effect on the sale. After being put up at lOOgs., Mr. Crosbie and Mr. Pickersgill finally opposed until the latter secured her at 170 gs. Lot 3, Coral, which also traced to a Warlaby tribe, had two or three objectionable crosses to begin with ; this, as well as her light-fleshed appearance, albeit she milked fairly too, and broken service prevented any strong bidding, and Mr. Edward Fawcett, who has a liking for the tribe, got her at 45 gs. He also bought her bull-calf by Knight of Knowlmere, a promising animal, at 36 gs. The most numerous tribe was the Sockburn. This family having as ancient descent as any of the kingdom had passed through various hands before reaching Mr. Storer's. On Robert Colling's Lancaster (360) Mr. Bates implanted Belvedere (the " double blessing," as it is humorously termed), and Mr. Whitaker's Norfolk. The Rev. T. Cator added a little Tempest and Spencer blood, whilst ^Ir. Tounsheud gave it a dose of Bates through Duke of Cambridge, and Mr. Storer is now applying the Booth portion. Fecundity must be naturally expected from such an admixture as well as diversity of character. Yet this was not apparent. March Duchess was a large massive square cow, somewhat palish in her red and white colour, but a fine animal nevertheless. Being recently bulled, and not having calved for two years pre- viously, Mr. Wardle got her on the hazard at 45 gs. Rose Duchess was also good, although not of such scale as March Duchess. Neat as Earl of Rosedale may have been he is not the bull to impress size or grandeur. Even Rose Duchess had no live calf to show, and she sold very well at 72 gs. Queen Duchess 3rd has gone six months and came again, so that only 42 gs. could be got for her. The two next having calves by them were not in good order, and being young did not show well. They were the only two by Earl of Clare, and gave him little credit as a sire. Theymade46gs. and40gs. respectively. A nice heitor, Milcote Maid, of Mr. Adkin's old Diana tribe, sold slowly, but well, at 62 gs. (Mr. Gurney), and then probably came, next to Anna 7th, the pick of Mr. Storer's lot. This was Renuie Gwynne 2ud, a sweet nice roan heifer, bred by the late Mr. Caddy ; after sharp 5 and 10 gs. bids she went at 130 gs. to Mr. Gibb, Canada, Mr. C. Williams being one of the last ou. The yearling heifers sold well, and a little more spirit was thrown into the sale, Knowlmere Duchess, out of May Duchess, going at 65 gs. to Mr. Wardle ; indeed he got the best of this Sockburn tribe. Mr. Waldo's cattle were in better condition, having apparently been well done ; the females were of two tribes. Lot 2 was bred by Messrs. Angus, a large massive cow, a little flat ribbed and plain in her quarters ; not holding, she weut very cheap at 39 gs. Her two heifers inherited their dam's defects, and coupled with it what the late Mr. Maynard described as a strong constitutioned nose ; they accordingly made but low figures. The five Sweethearts were better; tracing from Mr. Tracy's branch of Sweetheart 3rd, they had the crosses of the Irish Baron, combining the Booth and Sylph blood of Baron of Rathcool, his son, and finally of Fitz-Hopevvell, a capital sire, bred by Mr.JWaldo from Fathom, of the Fame tribe, which was bought at Holmepierrepoint. Lot 9 was THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. an elegant good cow, but thin and fretted from her journey, and Mr. W. Game got her a bargain at 60 gs. for the old Broadmoor pastures; while her heifer calf, certainly by Mr. Booth's King of Britain, ran up to within 4 gs. of her dam's price. Lot 14, Charming Bead, a very handsome heifer by Mr. Torr's Beadsman, sold fairly well at 130 gs. ; she was heavy incalf, and her more than half-sister, not so forward and perhaps a trifle pl?.iner, was bought by Mr. Attenborough at 80 gs. Of the bulls, Rosedale Favourite, out of the dam of the prize heifer Rosedale had been used at Hellidon; although neat, yet he lacked size, if he may be a good bull for a herd of large-framed pointy cows. Mr. Deans got him at a trifle over but- chers' price (47g3.), whilst Rosedale Comet, a white, could only reach 40gs. Lot 27, Crown of the Realm, a very short-legged thick-fleshed bull, had some difliculty at times in breathing, and in consequence a reserve of 150gs. was put on him. This Mr. Pickersgill covered with 5, and the bull goes into Yorkshire at 15 5gs. Flower Duke caused some amusement by his ugly colour and big horns, although a useful, large, farmer's bull. Prince of the Roses, by Prince Christian from Warlaby, out of Rose of Eden, a 300g3. purchase at Beeston, did not show quite so well as he might have done, and was not so good in his fore- arm as we vifould expect from his blood. Messrs. Dudding and Pears joined on him, and he went reasonably at llOgs. The young bull-calves, although late in the season, sold fairly well, and brought the average to £46 14s. for the bulls. A few extra lots were sold afterwards. Raspberry, and her calf, of the Nonpareil tribe, went cheap enough at 76gs. the pair, and Mr. Fawcett re-purchased the Queen of Beauty at 53gs., which Mr. Longman bought at his sale last autumn for 50gs. Grand Patriot, a good roan bull of Mr. Oliver's breeding, goes into Wales at 71gs. Taking the result of the sale, it appears that Mr. Storer's twenty-three head averaged within six shillings of 60 gs. each, and Mr. Waldo's eight shillings over £60. The five Sylphs, alias Sweethearts, made £78 6s. 7d. each, theeight Blanches £53 83.4d.!; buttaking into consideration their state and condition, this can hardly be looked upon as a just estimate. The sale all through was slow, and the biddings came forth reluctantly, although there was a company present suflttcient to take three times the num- ber at double the price. But this must always occur in a greater or less degree with draft sales away from home. Mr. Booth, of Warlaby, was in the chair at lunch. SALE OF THE LATE MR. BLYTH'S SHORTHORN HERD, At Woolhampton, on Friday, June 12th, 1874. BY MR. THORNTON. It has been often said that a good bull leads to a pure herd, and it may justly apply to the Woolhampton herd. Ten years ago Tam o'Shanter (20930), own brother to Saraphina 13th and 15th, was bought at Mr. Lawford's sale at Southcott. He did good service among the dairy cows kept on the home farm, and was very useful to the tenants hard by. Some pure bred cows were soon after- wards bought, and gradually replaced the half-breds and Alderneys, though one or two Guernseys were to be seen on the sale day. The establishment requiring good butter and cream for town was put in by way of apology for their appearance; but of this there was little need, for though the cows showed good udders, yet the calves running by their sides managed to empty them. Mr. Charles Barnett's herd supplied Old Water Wave 6th, Lot 3, a fine, deep old cow, very much of the old Yorkshire type, especially about the head and horns. She had bred a large family, and done good service in the ten years she had been on the farm. The dis- persion of Mr. Champion's herd at Calcot in the neigh- bourhood, one of the flrst herds, by-the-bye, in the district, was the means of bringing a few more to Woolhamp- ton. In 1865, however, several purchases were made at Mr. Fawcett's, of Childwick ; Mr. Wells, of Redleaf (whence Lot 1 came, one of the finest cows in the sale) ; and from Mr. Bowly. Fair Lady, a 60 gs. purchase at the Siddington sale, gave so much satisfac- tion, that several others were bought privately from Mr. Bowly, and the catalogue of seventy-five head, contained no less than twenty-four lots descended from his herd. Three lots were also bought at Her Majesty's sale at Windsor, in 1867 ; among these were Lot 9, Ringlet, which Mr. W. Game took at 35 gs., as well as most of her heifers, which were called Frogmores. One of them, however. Lot 19, a handsome red, Mr. Cope took into Ireland, at 50 gs., as well as the following lot, Melody 2nd, one of the best in the sale, at 65 gs. She was a large, massive, red, round-ribbed cow, down calving. Lot 6, Queen of the South, of Lord Ducie's Chafl" tribe, was a calf purchase at Mr. Fawcett's ; a useful cow her- self, she had been a true and regular breeder, producing seven calves, four of which were in the catalogue. Three of them werepurchasedby Mr. Kingfor Mr. Benyon, M.P., at 50 gs., 40 gs , and 52 gs. respectively ; but the last calf, a nice hairy roan, but thin, went to Mr. C. Stubbs, at 21 gs. Four years later, Fra Diavolo was selected at the Royal at Leicester, where he stool fourth as a yearling. Some good heifers were by him, whilst some of the younger ones had Snowball as sire. This bull was by Seventh Duke of York from British Lass, a cow of the Gazelle tribe. Lots 41 and 42, two capital yearlings, were fine samples of his get, and about the two best yearlings ; the better bred (42) made a guinea less (56 gs.) than the better looking (41) lot, which went to Norwich. Last year it was intended to have a few more fashionably -bred animals. Duke of Kennet, bred by Mr. Sheldon, combining the Bates and Knightley bluod, was the sire of the calves, and Knight of Geneva, of the Duchess and Blanche strains, had both been bought previously ; but when Col. Towneley's sale took place two heifers were bought, Oxford's Duty, a red, and Grand Duke's Butterfly, of the Blanche tribe. Bull- calves had been dropped from each, but neither of the calves made great prices, not being in high condition. Oxford's Duty, with the bull Knight of Geneva, was re- served, with about eight or nine others, to keep up a herd at Woolhampton, but Grand Duke's Butterfly was sold. The blooming condition that the " Talleyrand of trainers" can put on had departed, consequently she dropped some- thing over 50 gs. on her cost price. M. De Vitre boutrht her at 185 gs. Red Butterfly, bred by Mr. Attenboro, and bought at Whitley last year, returns to her old quarters at 100 gs. Many of the lots go into Somerset- shire, Gloucestershire, Kent, and Sussex, two or three into Hampshire, Essex, and Oxfordshire, while several remain in the county, and it was singular that though many North Country breeders were present, none of the lots go due north. Looking at the cov^s, heifers, and calves in the park, there was nothing very striking in the herd. Even and uniform they were naturally enough, being by the same sires ; but no lot was so very excellent as to specially attract notice. Two good red cows were noticeable, and Mr. Gorringe bought them both to go into Sussex. The fashionable lots were not cracks, though very good. Neither were they fat good, healthy condition was the rule ; and the appear- ance of the heifers indicated that the calf flesh might have been better kept on. As to the arrangements they were excellent, and the field in which the luncheon tent and sale-ring were erected afforded one of those charming little bits of beautifully-wooded landscape scenery. go I'HE FAriMER'S MAGAZlKe. bounded by Kingclere ia the distance, that only the South of England can show. Here and there in the park the coloury cattle, the bright red-bricked mansion, and noble trees formed a picture that if transferred to canvas might gain the eye-liue in the Academy^. ANOTHEE GEEAT SALE OF AMEEICAN SHOETHORN'S. TO THE EDITOR OF THE MARK LAXE EXPRESS. Sir, — What can possess breeders to become so anxious for that peculiar hrcti of the Duchesses, is to me strange aud unaccountable, aud I cannot help saying that it is of an idiotic character. This bad example was set iu England by earls, nobility, and gentry, who were born with " silver spoons in their moidlis," and who never knew the industry, perseverance, and sterling stability required to obtain wealth by the sweat of their brow, and hence became ignorant of the true value of money. With men placed in such a critical situation, their minds become stagnant without some hobby to ride, and when once adopted they are reckless in its support. If pedigree is a protection, then let the man sustain it. Pedigree in a nobleman is good, when nobly sustained ; but when he becomes reckless with his purse to support fashion, where is his usefulness ? Poverty and high pedigree, kowever fashionable, cannot sro well together. So it is with the pedigree of Duchesses : view them in their pampered state of to-day, loaded with flesh to attract the novice ; then look at them hence in their natural state, and what are they ? Mark their pedigree, and what does it amount to ? It will not sustain their constitution, for die they will. This pernicious example has been studied in this country. A nobleman's pedigree is ignored, title is sneezed at in the human race, and for this reason is transferred to cattle; they are honoured with Dukes and Duchesses ; thus become fashionable, regardless of value or true merits. Such a position has rendered them a fictitious name aud false fame, and when brought to the hammer, no matter whether the auctioneer is a swaggering prodigal, a chattering magpie, or a sound man of few words, the bidders are there with the money in their pockets, or an established credit, and they will have them at fabulous prices even if theg know they will die before they get them home, and are aware that this family or tribe are constitutionally failing by pampering to hide their faults. With this erroneous system of specu- lation, these enticing titles will become extinct. I will not say much now on the cattle or sale, but send you the particulars from the Chicago Times ; but I will say, the highest prices sold, and called " Bates Duchesses," showed plainly, in their heads, and black-tipped horns, the W'est Highland cross ; while th» slender waist, so general in all the Duchesses that were sold, was inherited from Duke bulls called^;^^^. The general impression|of the crowd was, that America needed the money much more than they did the 2nd Duke of Ilillhurst, and those who have suffered from the weak constitutions of the Duchesses were glad those animals were returning home, like the prodigal sou, ta die where their anceitors originated. The Professor was there to represent the Agricultural College of Michigan. He is still of the opinion that he can drain swamps to the centre and ignore the •utlets ; and he still thinks that the Bates young bull he purchased at the New York Mills sale, with a light waist, large paunch, flat sides, long legs, and narrow brisket, is going to improve the College stock wonder- fully, because he is fashionable, hence the improvement. Mr. Page yraa so much ezhaugted, that h« rrai com- pelled to call Colonel Kid to his assistance in the midst of the sale. The Colonel is a favourite auctioneer in Kentucky, and has sold many of the best there. You will hear further from me on the Dukes aud Duchesses. W. H. Sotham. Transit House, Stock Yards, Chicago, III. Since writing you from Chicago there is some doubt whether the bull sold for fourteen thousand dollars will go to England. From the appearance and conduct of the purchaser, Mr. Geo. Robbius, the matter looks mys- terious. This gentleman, the day previous, at Mr. C. C. Park's sale, made it known to mauy that he was com- missioned to give twenty thousand dollars for the bull, thei-efore other breeders of the same tribe ran him up. Detroit, Mich., May 2oth. The stock farm of Colonel William S.King, of Minneapolis Minn., has lonj? been regarded as a model of it» kind by the Sliortliorn cattie-deulers of tliis country. Its owner has paid great attention to tlie breeding of blooded stock, and had ac- quired a herd second to none in America. It has been found, of late, necessary to abandon the principal portion of the pasture and meadow land for city purposes, and in conse- quence thereof Colonel King was compelled to dispose of he Lyndale lierd, comprising 80 head of the choicest Shorthorn cows aud bulls to be found in the market. This sale too, place at Dexter Park, beginning at 11 o'clock. It was thn nieiius of drawing together nearly 400 of the stock-fanciers of this country, and also was successful in attracting the attention of Shorthorn dealers in England and Canada, where the merits of the herd were perhaps more fully appreciated than here nt home. Tlie grand stand of the Dexter Park course was jammed with spectators and parties intent on purchasing the stock ; and tiie quarter-stretch, which wss partially reserved for the display of the animals,was crowded with stock men and others. Tiie sale was beyond doubt one of the most noteworthy of the day. The sale be^an with the exhibition of the noted bull. Second Duke of Hillhurst, a Duchess animal, by tlie Sixth Duke of ieneva. He is less than three years old, is red and whitf, and a perfect model in build. The moment the auctioneer, Mr. John R. Page, of New York ^'tate, asked for an olfer for the Duke, a gentleman in the crowd made the response, " Ten lliousand dollars 1" A buzz of excitement went about the grand stand, and amongst the bidders on the quarter-stretch, all of whom craned their necks to get a glimpse at the gentle- man who had made so large an offer. He was a quiet-looking Englishman, with nothing in particular to individualise him above the hundreds of other stock men. The bid was then jumped to 13,000 dols., when a season of sparring in bids then occurred between the Englishman and Long John Wentworth, the latter fancy stock man desiring to possess himself of this bull. The bids went up gradually, 100 dols. at a time, until finally Long John found his limit reached at 13,900, and the little Englishman was awarded the sale at 14,000 dols. The purchaser is George R. Robbins, of London, England, who will take the bull to his country at an early day. It is the desire of the English Shorthorn fanciers and breeders to gather together all the Bates ^tock animals there are in America and get them back to England again, where they may hold tha monopoly of this strain. Two or three calves by this famous bull, were also on the ground and disposed of during the day. The price at which the Duke was sold is the largest ever realised in America for a bull. The highest figure reached for bulls at the famous New York Mills sale was only 12,000 dola. A short time after the Duke of Hillhurst was knocked down to Mr. Robbins, his agent was offered 16,000 dols. for his bargain, but he would cot accept the proffer, as he stated to parties, privately, that his principal was so anxious to secure the hull that he had instructed him to p»y 20,000 dols. for him if he could not be obtained for less. After disposition had been made of this bull the sale of the cows was begun and continued until the list w;is exhausted, after which the remainder of the bulls were taken up and disposed of. Bidding on the cows was quite spirited many of the animals bringing high and first-class prices. Tliei-e was not a cow or heifer in the catalogue that sold for less than 200 dols., while several of them ran as high as 5,500 doh. A trio of Ducheis heifers ranged from 2,100 dols, to tHE i^ARMER'S MAaAZINB. 81 4,400 Qols., while tvj'o heifers, less than two years old, and twins, realised 11,000 dels, from one gentleman afterwards, and while the sale was in progress a telegram was received, from a party in another state, offering 15,000 dols. for the same animals. Very spirited bidding was shown on a seven-months bull-calf. True Blue, by the Second Duke of Oneida, one of the most noted bulls of the country. Started at 1,000 doU., the bids ran up finally to 3,240 dols., and at that figure the little fellow was transferred to a new owner. Only four of the cows were withdrawn from the stand. Col. King asking permission to retire them on account of their being in an unfit condition for sale, and he not being willing to guarantee their breeding qualities. COWS AND HEIFERS. Garland, red and white, four years, bred by Lord Penrhyn, England.— T. J. McGibbon, Cynthiana, Ky., 2,100 dols. Habbacks Garland, red and white, one and a half years, by Baron Hubback Second. — William Sandusky, Indianola, 111., 2,100 dols. Grace, red and white, nine months, by Second Duke of Hill- hurst. — S. W. Jacobs, West Liberty, Iowa, 1,115 dols. Gem of Lyndale, red and white, two years. — S. E. Ward, Kansas City, 1,850 dols. Peri Third, roan, five years. — A. W. Griswold, Morrisonville, Vt., 2,100 dols. Peri Second, of Lyndals, red, sis months. — Avery and Murphy, Detroit, 2,500 dols. Peri Fourth, red and white, four and a half years, — T. J. McGibbon, 3,000 dols. Peri Fifth, red and white, one and a half years. — James Wadsworth, Genessee, N. Y., 4,000 dols. Bell Duchess, red, three and a half years, by Sixth Duke of Geneva. — James Wadsworth, 4,400 dols. BeU Duchess Second, red and white, two years, by Baron Hubback Second. — Ben. B. Groome, Winchester, Ky., 2,100 dols. Bell Duchess Third, red, two years, by Second Duke of Oneida.— T. J. McGibbon, 3,300 dols. Lyndale Wild Eyes, roan, bred in England, three years. — T. J. McGibbon, 5,000 dols. Star of Lyndale and calf, red and white, three years. — S. E. Ward, 1,850 dols. Scottish Lady, red, two and a half years. — S. W. Jacobs, 1,275 dols. Florence, roan, one and a half years. — D. M. Flynn, Boone- ville, Iowa, 1,700 dols. Sunshine, roan, five and a half years. — D. W. Wendell, Lincoln, 111., 650 dols. Sunrise, roan, one and a half years. — A. W. Griswold, Mor- risville, Vt., 1,025 dols. Sunflower, roan, four months. — Chas. ^Vadsworth, Genessee, N. Y., 800 dols. Second Lady Gwynne, red and white, five and a half years. — T. J. McGibbon, 1,500 dols. Medora Fourteenth, red roan, four years. — J. R. Craig, Edmundton, Canada, 1,300 dols. Oakwood Gwvnne Second, roan, one year. — N. M. Curtis, Ogdensburgh, N. Y., 1,500 dols. Third Malvern Gwynne, roan. — T. J. McGibbon, Cynthiana, Ky., 3,000 dols. Miss Gwynne, roan, one year. — A. W. Griswold, Morrisville, Vt., 3,000 dols. Butterfly's Rose, roan, five years. — S. E. Ward, Kansas City, 1,025 dols. Butterflys' Gift, red, one and a-half years. — S. E. Ward, Kansas City, 1,900 dols. Lucy Ann Twelfth, red and white. — John Nichols, Blooming- ton. 111., 750 dols. Rosebud, red roan, two years. — S. W. Jacobs, West Liberty, Iowa, 500 dols. Lady Newham Third, and bull calf, red, sis years. — S. E. Ward, Kansas City, 825 dols. Agnes, red and white, two and a half years.— S. E. Ward, 1,035 dols. Moselle Sixth, red, two years. — A. W. Griswold, Morris- ville, Vt., 1,600 dols. JIazurka of Lyndale, red roan, five years.— S. Meredith and , Son, Cambridge City, Ind., 1,525. Mazurka and Lyndale Third, red roan, one and three-fourths •; years.— J. H. Ki-^senger, Clarksville, Mo., 1,475 dols. Mazurka of Lyndale Fourth, red, eight months. — John Nichols, Bloomington, 111., 1,100 dols. Empress, roan, three and a-half years. — S. E. Ward, Kansas City, 800 dols. Lady Mary Fifth, red, two and three-forths years. — General N. M. Curtis, Ogdensburgh, N. Y., 3,000 dols. Lady Clyde, roan, one and a-half years. — J. C. Jenkins, Petersburg, Ky,, 900 dols. Lady Mary Seventh, roau ; twin with Lady Mary Eighth, roan, 5,500 dols each. — Charles Wadsworth, Genessee, N.Y. Second Tube Hose of Brattleboro, red and white, scTen years. — T. J. McGibbon, Cynthiana, Ky., 1,805 dols. Fifth Lady Sale of Brattleboro, roan, four and three-fourth years.— Charles Wadsworth, Genesseo, N.Y., 2,000 doll. Sixth Lady Sale of Brattleboro, red and white, three years.— J. R. Craig, Edmundton, Canada, 900 dols. Eighth Lady Sale of Brattleboro, roan, two years, bred in England. — Charles Wadsworth, Genessee, N. Y., 1,600 dols. Roan Princess, roan, one and a half years. — D. M, Flyun, Boonville, Iowa, 1,600 dols. Rosa Bonheur Fifth, red and white, one and three-fourth years.— Gen. N. M. Curtis, Ogdensburgh, N. Y., 900 dols. Lilac, roan, eight years.— John Nichols, Bloomington, 111., 330 dols. Prune, red, ten years.— J. Weaver, Oleana, Henderson County, 111., 375 dols. Royal Oakland Beauty, red, four years. — Benjamin Sumner, Woodstock, Conn., 525 dols. British Maid, roan, two years, bred in England. — J. Weaver, Oleana, 111.. 200 dols. Mayflower, roan, bred in Ireland, five years. — E. L. Davidson, Springfield, Ky., 1,424 dols. June Flower, roan, two years. — J. G. Colter, Reesville, 0., 1,225 dols. Pink Thorn Leaf, with bull calf, roan, nine years, bred in England.— E. L. Davidson, Springfield, Ky., 900 dols. Rose of Lyndale, red, two years. — J. G. Colter, Reesville, O. 650 dols. Mazurka Ninth, red roan, four years. — S. E. Ward, Kansas City, 700 dols. Miss Leslie, roan, six years. — Josiah Chorn, Towanda, 111.. 2,005 dols. Miss Leslie Napier, red, three years. — J. Chorn, Towanda. 2,015 dols. Constance of Lyndale Second, red, two and a-half years. — A. W. Griswold Morrisville, Vt., 1,675 dols. Constance of Lyndale 3rd, roan, one and a-half years. — John R. Craig, Edmundton, Canada, 1,600 dols. Oakwood Gwynne, roan, two and a half years, was withdrawn but afterwards sold at private sale. — C. C. Parks, Wauke- gan, 750 dols. Hope of Oakwood, red roan, two years. — D. M. Flynn, Boon- ville, Iowa, 600 dols. This last concluded the sale of cows and lieifers, when the following bulls were brought into the arena and disposed of. The first-mentioned animal was the first one disposed of at the auction, before the cows were put up, but is placed here for classification : Second Duke of Hillhurst (12893), red and whits, by Sixth Duke of Geneva, Duchess. — G. R. Robbins, London, Eng- land, 14,000 dols. Lord of the Lake, roan, two and a half years. — C. A. DegrafT St. Paul, Minn., 500 dols. Emperor Booth (11915), red, three and a half years. — J. M. Colter, Reesville, O., 425 dols. Baron Hubback Second, red, bred in England, four years. — C. A. Degraff, St. Paul, 2,600 dols. Marquis of Oakwood, red roan, two year*. — J. M. Kenyon, Fillmore, Mo., 560 dols. Sam, roan, one and a half years. — John Wentworth, Chicago, 500 dols. Second Baron of Oakwood, roan, one and a half years. — D. M. Flynn, Boonville, Iowa, 410 dols. Lord Bright Eyes, red, one year. — Charles Whittaker, Chelsea, Mich., 360 dols. Panic, white, one year. — D. M, Flynn, Boonville, Iowa, 300 dols. Peabody, roan, one year, — J. D. Downer, Marshaltown, Iowa, 190 dols. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. Third Baron of Onkwood, roan, one year. — D. M. Flynn, Boonville, Iowa, 280 dols. Fourth Baron of Oakwood, white, one year. — H. Sherwood, Breedsville, Mich., 200 dols. Star, red and white, one year. — P. Stuart, for J. Wentworth, Chicago, 745 dols. forrester, roan, one year. — Peter Stuart, Gibson City, 111., 210 dols. Earl Gwynne, red and white, one year. — S. W. Jacobs, West Liberty^ Iowa, 190 dols. Lord Cat-lisle, roan, nine months. — E. H. Mathews, Chicago, 210 dols. Patron, red and white, eight mouths, — P. Stuart, for John Wentworth, Chicago, 440 dols. True Blue, red and white, seven months. — P. A. Coen,*W^ash- burne, 111., 2,240 dols. Patriot, red and white, sis months. — R. C. Kelly, Peru, 111., 200 dols. Prince Gwynne, roan, three months.— S. M. Thompson, Can- ton, 111., 360 dols. Cherry Prince, roan, by Second Duke of Oneida, one year, was not in the catalogue. — Emeiy Cobb, Kankakee, 111., 505 dols. There were, in all, 59 cows sold, aggregating 102,370 dols., making an average of about 1,735 dols. each. Twenty-one bulls were sold for 25,425 dols., averaging nearly 1,217 dols. each. The sum total of this sale vras 127,795 dols. THE ADULTERATION OF FOOD. MILK, BUTTER, AND BREAD. At the sitting of the Committee of the House of Commons appointed to inquire into tlie operation of the Adulteration Act, Dr. Voelcker, the analyst of the Royal Agricultural Society of England, was examined by Mr. C. S. Read, the chairman; when Dr. Voelcker said he was astonished to hear that anyone professing to be an analyst could have said, as Dr. Tidy was reported to have declared, that 33 per cent. of water could be added to milk without detection. There were variations in the qualities of milk certainly, but these were not great. The greatest variation in milk solids was from 10 to 14, but the usual variations — the natural ones — were from 10 to 12. But he would make no " standards," such as had been suggested by Dr. Tidy, below which he should decide milk to be adulterated. No such standard should be fixed in an analyst's mind, let alone in an Act of Par- liament. To fix such a standard even at 10 per cent, would permit a dishonest tradesman to adulterate, while it would lead an honest tradesman to be fined for selhng poor milk as pure ; and milk would be poor in some seasons. Asked as to the difference between town and country milk, he said town milk was, as a rule, better than country milk, for the reason that some of the owners of town dairies knew how to keep up their cows better than some of the country owners. With regard to the operation of the Act on the milk supply, he considered that much good had been done by logislation, for better milk was to be obtained now than before. Milk was sometimes a little artificially coloured, but it was chiefly adul- terated with water and by the abstraction of the cream. What was called " Australian" aud " Dutch" butter was manufac- tured to a large extent. He had examined a sample of stufi' sold as "Australian butter" at7id. apound,andoninquiry he found it to consist largely of bone fat, this grease being extracted by the steaming of bones of animals. This was manufactured in England, and was most disagreeable to the taste and smell. The real Australian butter was good. The Dutch butter was better to the taste than English, but it was manufactured from American lard and some real butter. The American lard, a merchant had complained to him, was sent over from here to Dunkirk and came back as Dutch butter. Asked if genuine butter naturally varied, he said it varied less in composition than in quality, for the quality varied with the food of the cow. He was astonished at seeing that analysts had given decided statements as to the fats found in butter, as there were no decided tests. As to bread, before the Act the bakers used a " whitening powder," which contained alum, and this was followed by the sale of American, flour, which was of the same character as the whitening powder. This practice was largely stopped by the Act. Rice used to be mixed with bread too. Potatoes were also used, but he should hardly call the use of potatoes an adulteration. He did not think sugar was adul- terated, and as to the sugar " mites," there was no more to cause alarm in these than in the mites in cheese. He had seen many samples of mustard, but most were " mixed." As to cocoa, he could say the " prepared cocoa" was a mixture of starchy matter with the fat of the cocoa, but he thought this was done to make the cocoa more digestible. As to " pure cocoa," as the oil was to some extent extracted in this, it would come under the proposed extraction clauses. As to " prepared" corn flours, he could say they were chiefly of starch, but he considered starch an element of nutrition and as food. With regard to the absence of gluten in these flours, he did not consider this as establishing anything against them, for wheat meal, which contained 12 per cent, of gluten, cost a great deal more than bean flour, which con- tained twice the quantity of gluten. The bran taken from wheaten flour, containing a large quantity of gluten, might be lookad upon, according to some views, as an adulteration ; but as things were, the finer the flour the less gluten there was in it. If a man had to live exclusively on bread it would be better for him to eat brown bread, as containing more gluten, than upon white. Then, as to arrowroot, the starch contained in the corn flours was quite as nutritious as arrow- root, which was costlier. As to beer, he did not know of any decided adulteration of beer now. All wines were mixed, and one might look in vain for a pure vintage of foreign wines. Some wines were more fortified than others, especially port and sherries ; but as to claret, the cheaper this was the more likelihood there was of getting it less mixed. The higher classes of clarets were largely mixed. As to " British wines," they were mixed ; but he had not found anything injurious in them, except when they were young, when they would cause headache. As to French brandy, much of this as im- ported from France was nothing but beetroot spirit, and so coloured and flavoured that it would puzzle a chemist to dis- cover the cheat. Some spirits were adulterated with "fusil oil" (potato spirit), which was extremely injurious. He was astonished to hear that Dr. Tidy said most vinegar was adul- terated wholly. The large quantity of vinegar sold was from malt ; but some pickling vinegars were in many cases adulte- rated with acetic acid. Summarising his views en adultera- tion, he said tiiat cattle foods and articles used by the agriculturists were far more adulterated than human food. He thought, too, that much wrong had been done by the so-called food analysts, and he supported the idea that there should be a court of appeal against the statements of analysts. He thought it could not be allowed that "colouring" or " facing" of tea should be recognised as lawful, as this would be opening the door to every adulteration. He would not, however, have consi- dered 1 J per cent, of facing an adulteration. Asked who would be the best judge of tea, a dealer of experience or an " average analytical chymist," he held that an analyst could do very little in regard to tea, as it was a matter more of quality than any- thing else. As to the judgment of the " average analysts," he thought this should be open to question ; many of them, who were hastily appointed after the passing of the Act, had had to learn their business, and many of them had not even now had a suflicient training to enable them to be judges of fact in food analyses. Some of their statements in evidence had been very flippant and unwarrantable, aud they had done harm by rendering the Act obnoxious to honest men, who had been wronged by analysts' statements founded on a want of know- ledge. The witness referred to the statement of the " whole- sale examinations" (many thousands in a brief period) described by Dr. Tidy as having been made by him, and said that this was not the way that analyses should be made, for it was impossible from the number made, to take every case care- fully and thoroughly examine every sample with all the minnticE necessary to arrive at the truth. This could not be done in a wholesale or hasty way. He did not think that tea was adulterated in this country, and he thought the sale of THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. adulterated tea would come to an end here if all such teas were stopped at the Customs. He had not found any decidedly adulterated tea. Examined hy Mr. Welby, the witness objected to seeing certificates, especially his own, on tradesmen's goods ; for, he said, he had known a certificate given on a good sample to be attached to an adulterated article. In reply to Mr. Heygate, he said that much of the champagne was made from something else than grape, and though he could not say that what it was ■ made of was positively injurious, yet it had disagreeable effects. As to " improvers" going about the country offering to " doctor " or improve articles, as deposed by Mr. W, Jackson, the witness thought this was possible, but not probable, and that such persons had very little practice. The witness thought that many of the local analysts were incompetent, and that it would be far better to have fewer analysts, more highly paid, by salaries, and that the appointments should be taken out of the hands of local authorities. In reply to Sir JlENRY Peek, lie said he thought there should be a laboratory at Somerset-house to give the means of judging the analysts' analyses. He looked upon damaged tea when used to mix with other tea and sold as pure as an adulteration. He did not know that it was necessary to " face " tea to make it bear the voyage. He could not say — either in agreement or dis- agreement with Dr. Allen of Sheffield — whether when there was 69 per cent, of insoluble matter found in tea the tea con-: tained exhausted leaves. In reply to Mr. Sandford, the witness said that his meaning of not having any standard was that he would have every case decided on its merits. Though he knew that the facing of the tea was practised to make the tea appear better, yet he did not think it was morally an adul- teration, because it was generally understood that tea was faced, just as it was known there was colour in butter and cheese ; but in these cases the working man ate his butter and cheese and did not think about it. As to the facing of green tea being required to enable it to bear the voyage, black tea bore the voyage and was not faced. The examination of the witness by Mr. Carpenter Gar:th, 1874. In Liebig's first work on the Chemistry of Agriculture, a suggestion was thrown out to the effect that bones might be more advantageously applied as manure if the phosphate of lime, of which they mainly consist, were brought into a state of complete solution before depositing it in the soil. Imme- diately after the publication of tliat work, viz., in 1841, the waiter of this, impressed with a sense of the importance of the suggestion, put it to the test of experiment by dissolving a few bushels of ordinary crushed bones in sulphuric acid, and applying the product, diluted with several hundred parts of water, as a manure for the production of turnips. The solution was, in the first instance, applied to the drills by means of a common watering pan ; and the quantity of phosphate of lime so applied was, by calculation, made equal, or little more tliaa equal, to the whole amount of that substance (or rather of phosplioric acid), which a crop of turnips would take up from the soil. Such was the first attempt, so far as is known, to apply phosphate of lime in a soluble condition, or rather in a state of actual solution, as manure. It is needless now to state in detail the result of our first experiment, or to describe the various ap- pliances (a water cart, &c.), which were subsequently used for distributing the solution. It is only necessary to add, that the application of so large a quantity of liquid over a field of any considerable extent was found to be a very laborious business; and the practical difficulties thence arising led to the consi- deration whether the " dissolved bones" (for at that period bones were the only source of phosphate of lime available) might not be applied in a dry or powdered state. It was speedily found that the preparation might be so applied if used in larger quantity — not, indeed, with equal success, but stiU with sach a measure of success as to justify us in dispensing with the more cumbersome and laborious mode of application, [n giving some account of our first year's experiments in the local newspapers, and more especially in The Farmers' Maga- zine of that day, we endeavoured to state the considerations which led us to see the importance of Liebig's suggestion, and to explain the rationale of the practice (which we of course recommended for adoption), both with respect to the prepara- tion of the manure and to the superior advantages which we held it must needs possess when applied for the immediate production of a crop of turnips. In doing this, we explained the nature of the chemical action which takes place when dilute sulphuric acid is added to reduced or crashed bones, and stated that the important product thence resulting was " what chemists called a Saperpliosphate of Lime," putting the word " Superphosphate" in italics as a sort of apology, so to speak, for using a purely technical term; for such the word then was, although it has since come to be familiar in the mouths of all parties connected with agriculture, not only in this country, but throughout Europe and America. In the chemi- cal language of that day a super-sali was a combination of an acid with a base in which the former was supposed to exist in its highest proportion relatively to^the base ; and such, in point of fact, the peculiar phosphate of lime referred to really is, being what chemists would now call a mono-calcic j^hosj^hate ; that is, phosphoric acid in combination with one equivalent of calcium (the metallic base of lime). It was to this soluble phosphate of lime, then, that the term superphosphate vras THE I^ARMER'S MAGA^INl). originally applied by us. Like many other words in common use, it lias gradually, with a change of circumstances, been made to bear a different meaning from tliat originally attached to it ; and it would now be impossible, even if it were de- sirable, to recal it to its original and specific signification. In the commercial and agricultural world it is now commonly used, in a general way, to signify a manure prepared by the action of sulphuric acid on ground coprolites, apatite, or other mineral or serai-mineral phosphates of lime, wliile it has ceased to be applied to " dissolved bones." A curious evi- dence was afforded some years ago of the misconception and of the popular ignorance which prevailed on this sul>ject by a discussion, whicli was carried on in some of the agricultural journals, as to wliether " superpliosphate" made from bones was not different in its nature and qualities from superphos- phate inanufactured coprolites. Sec. The soluble phospiiate of lime produced by the action of sulphuric acid upon " bone- earth" and otiier natural tri-basie phosphates, has, for some years past, been generally — both by chemists and others — called " Bi-phosphate ;" and, in want of a better term (the use of tile word si/jjc'r/j/iosjjha/e,m its original sense, being precluded) , tiic writer of this must plead guilty to the use of tlie word bi-phospliafe in tliese columns and elsewhere. But, though following others in using the term l/i/j/ios/iha/e for the soluble phosphate of lime, we took occasion to point out some eight or ten years ago that it is really a misnomer, besides being otherwise objectionable, and ventured to advise analytical chemists, in noting the results of their analyses of " super- phosphates" &c., to state the precise amount of phosphoric acid existing in a soluble condition in the manure — whether in combination with lime, or other alkalies — instead of the usual details about " biphosphate"and its equality to so much " bone phosphate rendered soluble." But to this point we shall have occasion to recur, for the important work which we are about to notice affords evidence of the propriety of oiir suggestion. In first using the term " superphosphate" in tiie manner above indicated, we had little idea that the word would come to be gene- rally adopted throughout the world as the name of a substance familiarly known to everyone connected with the science or practice of agriculture. Still less did we expect to see the day when some two or three millions of pounds would be invested in its manufacture in Great Britain alone, not to speak of the extent to which the same manufacture is carried on in America and on the Continent of Europe, or to witness the amount of shipping, of general trade, and of labour (in mining, collecting coprolites, Stc), to which the demand for " superphosphate" has given rise. For many years we gave, from time to time, instructions to farmers for the preparation of their own super- phosphate, and in this part of the country, in the Lothians, and in some parts of England, tlie purchasing of a number of " carboys" of sulphuric acid, and its application to the " dissolving of bones" in large wooden troughs, or in tanks, or in some other rule way, formed, for a considerable period, a regular portion of the " annual toil" of the farm on the part of many of the more intelligent and enterprising agriculturists. But, nons avons change tout cela : the manufacture of superphosphate, not only from bones, but from coprolites, fossilised guano, S:c., came to be taken up as a special business by individuals or by commercial firms ; and had these parties in all cases, or even generally, conducted the business with anything like a proper knowledge of scientific principles, or been content with mode- rate profits, nothing but good would have resulted to all con- cerned. Much trouble would have been saved to the farmer, while the commodity which he required might have been pro- duced of better quality, if not at a cheaper rate, on account of the facilities which its manufacture on a large scale necessarily affords. Unluckily, the very nature of the manufacture not only afforded the utmost facilities for adulteration, but actually made such adulteration a sort of necessity, resulting from igno- rance on the part of some, while in not a few cases (too many, the amount of worthless stuff in the market seemed to indicate) the rate of profit which might be realised at the expense of the farmer was matter of discretion — we do not say of conscience — on the part of the vendors of what was called " superphos- phate." In fact, the farmers for a time accepted anything under that name ; and the word, like " charity," was made to cover a multitude of sins. During the lasttwelve or fifteen years, we have again and again insisted on the duty obviously laid upon the farmers of taking some means to ascertain that the materials which they bought as manure were really something like what they were sold for by the vendors ; and in doing so, we have repeatedly stated what ought to be the composition of honestly- prepared superphosphate, at the same time earnestly advising all parties to have nothing to do with mixtures of indefinite composition, sold under the names of " corn-manure," " turnip- manure," " grass-manure," and so forth. We have never ceased to remind farmers that the two substances of which they are mainly in want are phosphoric acid (in a soluble con- dition) and nitrogen — the latter in the form of ammonia, or of a nitric acid salt. Our warnings seemed, for a time, to fall in a great measure unheeded. The manure trade flourished. Some of those engaged in it realised fortunes by a very simple process. Gr idually, licwever, in this case — as we have had occasion to observe in other cases — the seed sown has, after a time, been productive of fruit. Increased intelligence and knowledge of the subject among agriculturists have led them to look more closely after their own interests. Nor has the sharp teaching of experience been wanting. The result has been that what are called Analytical Associations — that is, associations of farmers for the purpose of obtaining analyses of the manures and feeding stuffs which they purchase — have been instituted in various parts of the country. These asso- ciations have already done an incalculable amount of good, not only to their own members, but to the agricultural community generally. We observe that Dr. Voelcker has very lately discarded the_ term biphosphate, and substituted "mono-phosphate," by which, doubtless, he means to indicate the anhydrous salt, or what we have above designated as " mono-calcic phosphate," the chemical formula for which is, CaO Pj O5, or, which is the same thing, Ca Pa Os. Biphosphate of lime, according to Morfit (who uses the old chemical notation), is CaO, 2J10, PO5. It is exceedingly desirable that some uniform system should be adopted with reference to this matter. The phos- phoric acid, we repeat, is the valuable constituent to the farmer ; and what he desires I0 know from the chemical analyst is how much — what per-centage — of that substance a given manure coiitains. [Mr. Hay in this article makes some reference to a work which we have not seen, and so prefer to let him speak on his own autloity.— Editor 31. L. E.'] THE DORSETSHIRE DOWN. TO THE EDITOR OF THE MARK LANE EXPRESS. Sir, — In reference to your remarks on the Dorsetshire Down couples with which I took the prize at the Bath and West of England Show at Bristol, I beg to say — 1st. That the term " longwool" is an error in the catalogue's description, the prize having been offered for the best short- wool couples, and my sheep were entered as such. 2nd. The Dorsetshire Down sheep originated in a cross between the Hampshire and Southdown. It is the breed of sheep usually kept in this county, and is believed to be the best tenant- farmers' sheep, or in other words the most profitable, com- bining as it does the size of the Hampshire with the quality of the Southdown. 3rd. In answer to your question how is this breed to be maintained ? I can only say that I annually let and sell upwards of one hundred Dorsetshire Down tups. — I remain, yours obediently, George W. Homer. Athelhamj)ton Rail, Dorsetshire, June 20, IS?-!. THE HERD BOOK.— The following circular has been issued: 34), Charles Street, Berkeley Square, London, W-, June 15, 1874. — Sir, — A numerous and influential body of Shorthorn breeders having expressed a wish that some steps should be taken as to the future maiagement of Coates' Herd Book whenever Mr, Strafford should determine to resign the editorship, and as he has now signified to us his desire to do so, we earnestly invite you to attend a meeting of subscribers, to be held at Willis Rooms, King-street, St. James's, at 2 p.m., on Wednesday, July 1, to consider with him the best mode for the continuation of that work. — We remain, yours faithfully, Dunmore, Skelmersdale, Penrhyn, R, Nigel, F. Kingscote, John Storer, Thoa. C, Booth. - THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 89 REVIEW OE THE CORN TRADE DURING THE PAST MONTH. Up to the IStli of June the weather was forcing and the heat almost tropical, with, however, so scanty an allowance of rain, that a general conviction prevailed the crop of hay must be short, as well as that of spring corn, though the prospects for wheat were unusually good. But before half the month was reached came a week of very cold weather, with frosts so frequent and so sharp that much of the potato crop suffercJ, the whole harvest became deferred, and some apprehension has been entertained for the earlier pieces of wheat, which had pushed rapidly into bloom during the heat. The prospect, therefore, for the main crop has become less favourable, while there seems little chance for spring corn, especially beans and peas, from the long persistence of dry weather. The fall of rain having varied mate- rially in different places, we may have chequered crops, though all seem likely to be short, excepting' wheat, and that is yet doubtful ; the same sort of weather having ruled in France, at a period when stocks were so low, that values have been greatly enhanced, much wheat going from our coast, with flour and oats, and this at a time when we have little to spare, and have only been hoping to reach the end of our terra, without the public having to pay extravagant rates. That the stocks of wheat here must be at a low ebb is seen from the little now held in granary, and the small returns constantly made in the weekly sales, the last four weeks showing less by 39,000 qrs. than the small returns of 1873, which is about 25 per cent, below the rate then noted, and our foreign receipts weekly contliue below our estimated necessities. It is true that consumption always falls off in summer, and we are beginning to get the help of new potatoes from abroad and our own early districts ; but there is no provision against any possible calamity that may yet take place at the blooming time or gatherings, and the posi- tion is somewhat critical ; yet, as we live upon the bounty of Providence, let us hopefully depend upon it, especially as more rain has since fallen. They have already had so great a pressure from prices in the South of France, that 78s. to 80s. has been paid for wheat, bn- foreign arrivals are reaching Bordeaux and its ueighbourt hood, now moderating values, and throughout the pro- vinces there has been lately a partial decline. Still Marseilles, with all its receipts, keeps dear, having to coDti'ibute to the necessities of Switzerland as well as France. America has continued the cheapest place, and still sends the most liberal supplies, and to that country we shall still have to look till our own sheaves begin to be gathered, and the nation's anxiety shall cease. The following were the most recent prices at the several places named : Best white native wheat at Paris 73s., red 71s. ; Spanish white and Oi'»gon at Rouen 70s., spring Ame- rican 628. 6d., Polish 61s. 6d.; Ghirka at Marseilles 67s., Polish 66s. 8d. ; Californian white at Antwerp 66s., spring American 60s. 6d. ; best native wheat at Liege 69s. ; at Lou- vain 68s.; wheat at Maestricht 68s.; red wheat at Berlin 55s. 6d., at Cologne C3s., at Mayeune for August 58s. ; high-mixed at Danzic 60s. ; wheat at Pesth 56s. to 66s., Mecklenburgh at Hambro' 63s. 6d., Ghirka off the coast Oregon 64s., Canadian 62s. ; red spring at New York, per 4801b3. free on board, 44s. 6d. The first Monday in Mark-lane opened on a small supply of English wheat, the foreign arrivals being mode- rate, about two-thirds from New York and India, and a good portion fr«m Adelaide. The show of fresh samples from Essex was very limited; but with fine weather the demand was equally so, and prices were only maintained by a Continental inquiry. Orders from France raised the price of white foreign Is. per qr., but red sorts being left to English millers were Is. per qr. lower, with only little doing. Floating cargoes went off at full rates for the Continent, France being the principal buyer. Though short deliveries in the country this week kept some places from a decline, others noted a fall of Is. as Gainsboro', Market Rasen, Melton Mowbray, Newcastle, Sheffield, &c. ; but Liverpool on Tuesday was 6d. per cental down for red, and Id. more on Friday. No change was noted at Leith; Edinburgh was quiet for fine qualities, and Is. lower for inferior wheat ; and Aberdeen quoted a similar decline. The scarcity of native samples at Dublin kept them at the former range ; but foreign was dull, and in favour of buyers. On the second Monday the English supplies were small, and exceeded by the exports ; but the foreign arrivals were doubled, half being from America, and a fair quan- tity from Australia. The show of fresh samples this morning was very scanty; but it mattered not, the weather having increased in fineness, insomuch that factors were willing to take Is. less, and even then found it diffi- cult to sell. In foreign, generally, little was done, and less money was taken — say Is. on white qualities, and Is. to 2s. on red American spring. In floating cargoes white sorts obtained the prices of the previous week, but red declined 1?. per qr. The mid-summer weather which had been then prevailing, together with lower advices from London, had its usual influence in the country, making poorly-supplied places dull, and generally reducing rates Is. per qr. ; while some places noted a larger reduction, as Lynn, Melton Mowbray, Newcastle, St. Ives, &c., and Liverpool was down 2d. to 4d. per cental for the weelc. Edinburgh, Leith, and Glasgow were all cheaper Is. qr. Dublin was dull for Irish sorts notwithstanding their scarcity, and foreign was 6d. per barrel lower. On the third Monday there was another small supply of home growth, and the foreign arrivals fell off to less than one half of the previous week, two-thirds being American, with a moderate quantity from the Baltic. On the Essex stands a very small quantity of fresh samples was exhibited ; but though some frosty nights had been experienced, there was no disposition to pay more money, and the previous rates were but slowly given. The sudden change of weather, however, checked the downward dis- position of prices, and at Friday's decline of Is. some little business was done. In floating cargoes the previous rates were paid for the Continent. The country markets this week mostly resisted any furthur reduction, though some still remained dull ; but on Saturday there was a recovery of Is. at several places. Liverpool was quiet on Tuesday, and improved Id. to 2d. per cental on Fri- day. At Aberdeen, with severe drought, there was no change ; but Leith and Edinburgh were Is. to 2s. lower for wheat. Dublin, commencing the week dull, with some decline, afterwards rallied, and noted an improve- ment of 3d. per barrel on foreign. On the fourth Monday the smallest supplies were re- ceived both English and foreign, the latter only exceed- ing the exports by about 3,000 qrs. The exhibifcion of fresh English samples was also extremely scanty, and 90 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE factors commenced by asking Is advance, but the weather indicating a return to warmth they did not succeed, business remaining very slow. Tu foreign white there was no change, but the improvement in red spring noted on Friday was confirmed, with, however, but little business passing. The demand for floating cargoes was steady, and rather more money was paid for red American. There has been, therefore, a decline for tlie month of about Is. to 23. per qr. Since the last London market prices have hardened in the country. I TheimportsintoLondonfor four weeks were in English qualities 13,963 qrs., foreign 88,883 qrs., against 17,539 qrs. English, 138,712 qrs. foreign for the same period in 1873. The exports were 18,4.50 qrs. wheat, 20,415 cwts. flour. The imports into the kingdom for the four weeks ending the 13th of June were 2,727,010 cwts. wheat, 457,306 cwts. flour, against 2,906,638 cwts. wheat, 437,488 cwts. flour in 1873. The Loudon averages commenced at 63s. 6d. and closed at 63s. 2d. per qr. The general averages opened at 623. 2d. and ended at 61s. 4d. The weekly sales noted for four weeks were 160,381 qrs., against 199,847 qrs. for four weeks in the same time last year. The flour trade has been pretty steady as to prices during the month, but varying in activity with the de- mand for wheat. For the most part business has been dull, country sorts giving way on the second Monday Is. per sack, leaving Norfolks at 43s. Foreign, also, in sacks and barrels, have yielded to the same extent, but were kept from further decline by the demand from France ; and it was this that brought our exports to 20,415 cwts., the trade being mostly in medium quality barrels, at about 28s. ; but flue kilndried qualities for consumption still bring 32s. to 33s. The most recent quotation at New York for extra State was 6 d. 85c. (23s. 7d. per brl.) free on board. The top price of town-made has stood at 54s., and it has stood at about the same at Paris. The arrivals into London for the four weeks were in country sacks 48,347, in foreign 16,950 sacks 40,211 brls., against 74,425 sacks country, 15,147 sacks 62,215 brls. foreign for the same period in 1873. Maize, after declining about 23. in the first two markets, recovered Is. to Is. 6d. on the third, and has since remained firm, American landed being worth about 39s., white 42s. to 43s. The price at New York for mixed was 25s. 9d. free on board ; at Pesth, in Hungary, it was quoted 37s. The imports into London for four weeks were 36,884 qrs., against 49,243 qrs. in 1873. The malting season beiug over it has mattered little that the crop of English barley has been nearly exhausted and brought supplies to their lowest. Foreign arrivals also have been very moderate, and so prices have kept at a high range for grinding and distillation, the lowest price for the former being about 33s., while prime stout French and Danish have been worth 40s. to 44s. It is thought we cannot have a good crop this year and that prices for malting will again rule high. The imports for four weeks into London in British were only 406 qrs., in foreign 30,110 qrs., against 1,344 qrs. British, 25,553 qrs. foreign in 1873. Malt during the month has been but a slow sale, and with more anxiety to clear stocks, at the close there was a decline of Is. per qr. The oat trade, with continuously good arrivals from abroad, has been almost constantly rising. Stocks here, in Scotland and Ireland being reduced very low, and placing the whole country in a state of dependence on our receipts from the Baltic and elsewhere, Pfirliament being in town, has kept up a large consumption, and values have improved fully Is., notwithstanding slight fluctua- tions iu the lower qualities. 40 lbs. Eussian have become worth 29s. 6d. to 30s., and prime sweet Sweden SOs. to 31s., with the lighter and inferior qualities relatively quite as dear. The long drought here and in France give both countries but poor prospects. Indeed we have lately had a French demand, and though some rain has recently fallen in France, as well as here, prices in Paris have risen, prime qualities beiug fully worth 31s. In Belgium, Hollaud, and Germany, as well as Hungry, it has been m\ich the same, and as there are yet fully two months to harvest, people begin to doubt the power of Eussia and Sweden to supply all the world, and fear ex- travagant rates, unless rain falls in abundance and changes the prospect generally. Our receipts in London for four weeks were 618 qrs. English, 64 Scotch, 237,849 qrs. foreiga, against 1,422 qrs. English, 157,327 qrs. foreign in 1873. The bean supplies, both Euglish and foreign, have been moderate, and the first Monday opened with a rise of Is. to 2s, per qr., which has since been maintained but nothing beyond it, the late advance making them very dear and lessening the demand. Ticks are worth 42s., Harrows 4Ss., and small 52s., large French 46s., Egyp- tian 443. The imports for four weeks into London were 1,253 qrs. English, 3,872 qrs. foreign, against 1,977 qrs. English, 1,300 qrs. foreign in 1873. Hog peas have been forced up by scarcity, still maples are worth 47s., and duus 44s. to 45s., while white foreiga have risen from their comparative cheapness about 2s., being now worth 453. The total imports in four weeks were 312 qrs. English, 8,735 qrs. foreign, against 149 English, 5,525 qrs. foreign in 1873. Linseed has been quiet but maintained its price. Arrivals 43,64 i qrs. against 14,630 qrs. in 1873. The poor prospects for the crop of cloverseed and other seeds have kept the values up, but there are very small stocks on hand. MUIR OF ORD SHEEP MARlvET— INVERNESS, (Wednesday.) — A stilTer market than that which was held to- day has not taken place on the same s'.aucs for several years. The numbers on the ground were also below that of the cor- responding market of last year. Blackfaced predominated, and several lots of Cheviots were also on the ground, but half- breds were conspicuous by their absence. The prevaiUag^ drouglit has caused pastures to decline, and hill fanners having sent their stock to their su-nmer quarters were loth to bring them to market, expecting that sales could not be effected to their advantage. The fact is that there is at present a sort of panic in tlie sheep trade. AVool is also disposed of at reduced figu.res ; and these thiags combined caused, as we have said, transactions to be effected with difficulty ; and at the conclu- sion a great proportion of stock remained unsold. Fevv dea- lers put in an appearance. Cheviot lioggs sold from 16s. to 23s., blackfaced hoggs from 18s. to 20s. ; blackfaced ewes and lambs snld from 25s., blackfaced ewe hoggs from 18s. to 23s., and three-year-old wedders at 25s. The number of animals exposed for sale was 1,308. TAUNTON FAIR, (Wednesday). — This annual fair attracted a large number of farmers and dealer . The supply of sheep and lambs was abundant, and horses and cattle about the average. Mr. Robert Farthing, of Farringdon, North Petherton, sent 20 longwooled rams for disposal at Mr. May- uard's auction stand, and they ran up to 6^ guineas. Prices showed a marked decliue. Sheep averaged 6d. to 7hi. per lb., and lambs a halfpenny higher, about 26s. each. Cross-bred ewes realised 41s. 6d. Beasts sold from 70s. to SOs. per cwt Trade was active. The Devon lonjwool ram (the property o Mr. Richard Corner, Torweston), which obtained the first prize at the Bath and West of England Agricultural Show at Bristol, was let for the season, from September, to Mr. Blake, of Trull, for the sum of 85 guineas. The competition amon;; bidiers for the other rams at the auction mart did not come up to the anticipation of the breeder, nearly the whole of them being unsold. Great interest was taken iu the wool trade, and prices ranged from Is. 2d. to Is. 3-i-d. for some lots. Printed by Watson aud llazell, 265, Strand, Loudon, AV.C. LONDON AND COUNTY BANKING COMPANY. ESTABLISHED 1836. SUBSCRIBED CAPITAL... £3,000,000, in 60,000 SHARES of £50 EACH. PAID-UP CAPITAL... £1,196,880; INSTALMENTS UNPAID, £3,120 (£1,200,000). RESERVE FUND (paid up)... £598,440; INSTALMENTS UNPAID, £1,560 (£600,000). NATHANIEL ALEXANDER, Esq. T. TYRINGHAM BERNARD, Esq. THOMAS STOCK COWIE, Esq. FREDERICK FRANCIS, Esq. Joint General Managers- CHIEF INSPECTOR. W. J. NORFOLK, Esq. DIRECTORS. FREDERICK HARRISON, Esq. WM. CHAMPION JONES, Esq. E. HARBORD LUSHINGTON, Esq. JAMES MORLEY, Esq. WILLIAM NICOL, Esq. A. HODGSON PHILLPOTTS, Esq. JAMES DUNCAN THOMSON, Es:ecutors of the late. G Angus, Broomley, Stocks- field (Daisey Third). Highly commended : Sir i\r. W. Ridley, Bart., Blagdon, Craralington (Lady Flora). Heifers, above one and under two years old, first prize, £7, J. and G. Atkinson (O. B. Justicia) ; second, £3, Her Majesty the Queen (C-Hrolina Fourt)i). Higiily commended: The Duke of Nortiiumberland, Alnwick Castle (Modesty) ; R. Harrett, Kirkwiielpington, Newcastle (Lady Fussbox). The class commended. Heifer calves, under twelve months old, first prize, £3, Sir W. G. Armstrong, C.B., Cragsi e, Rothbury (Fifth Princess of Oxford) ; second, £2, J. Wilson, Woodhorn Manor, Mor- peth (Mountain Beauty). Highly commended : R. Harrett. GALLOWAYS. Judges. — T. Gibbons, Burnfoot, Esk, Longtown. 11. McLaren, Olferton Hall, Sunderland. J. McCrackeu, Blackball, Kirkwelpington. Bulls, above two yeais old. — First prize, £10, and silver cup, value £25, M. and F. Teasdale, Bogg, Knavesdale, Alston THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 99 (Gallant Graham) ; second, £5, G. Graham, Oakbank, Long- to wu (Forest King). Highly commended : W. Heslop, Denton Hall, Brampton (Bob) ; J. Cunningham, Tarbreoch, Dalbeattie (The Pretender). Bulls, under two years old. — First prize, £10, J. Graham, Parcelstown, Longtown (Sim of Whitram) ; second, £5, R. Beattie, Howend, Longtown (Brewer). Cows or heifers. — First prize, £8, J. Graham (Dame Margaret Douglas); second, £-1., J. Cunningham (Maid Marion Ith). Highly commended : J. Graham (Hermione 5th). Cows or heifers, three years old. — First prize, £8, and a silver cup, value £10, J. Cunningham (Mary ind of Tar- breoch) ; second, £4, J. Graliam. Highly commended : J. Cunningiiara (Bridesmaid). CHANNEL ISL-VNDS. Judges. — (As for Gallowayf.) Cows or heifers of any age. — First prize, £6, Sir M. W. Ridley, Bart., Blagdon, Cramlington ; second, £3, Sir J. D. Marjoribanks, Bart., Lees, Coldstream (Josephine) ; third. Sir J. D. Marjoribanks (Blossom). AYRSHIRE?. Judges. — (A.s for Channel Islands.) Cows or heifers of any age. — First prize, £6, Sir M. W. Ridley, Bart. ; second, £3, C. T. Reed, Newbiggin House, Newcastle ; third, £1, 0. Richardson, Newbiggia-by-the-Sea. SHEEP. BORDER LEICESTERS. Judges. — J. C. Bolam, Stamford, Alnwick. J. Clay, Kirchester, Kelso. W. C. Thompson, Dilston, Cornbridge. Rams of any age. — First prize, £10, and a silver cup, value £25, T. Forster, jun., Elliughara, Chathill (Royal Exchange) ; second, £5, T. Forster, jun. Highly commended : Rev. R. W. Bosanquet, Rock, Alnwick. Shearling rams. — First prize, £10, G. Torrance, Sisterpath, Dunse; second, £5, and tiiird, £2, J.Clarke, Oldharastocks Mains, Ccckburnspath, Highly commended; G. Torrance. Commended : J. Clarke. Pens of five ewes. — I'irst prize, £5, Rev. R. W. Bosanquet ; second, £3, J. Nisbit, Larabden, Greenlaw. Highly com- mended: T. Simson, Blainslic Lander, Berwick. Pens of five gimraers.— First prize, £5, and a silver cup, value £10, G. Torrance ; second, £3, Rev. R. W. Bosanquet. CHEVIOTS. Judges. — J. Hedley, Bewshaugh, Kielder. J. Jardine, Arkleton, Langholm, N. B. J. Penman, Bonally, Edinburgh. Rams of any a°;e above two shear. — First prize, £0, and second, £4, T. Elliot, Hind hope, Jedburgh. Highly com- mended : J. Johnstone, Capplegill, Moffat. Two-shear rams. — First prize, £6, and a silver cup, value £10, and second, £*, T. Elliot. Shearling rams. — First prize, £6, A. Thompson, Kirknew- tou, Wooler; second, £i>, T. Elliot. Highly commended : T. Elliot. Pens of five ewes. — First prize, £4, and second, £2, T. Elliot. Pens of five gimmers. — First prize, £■!•, J. Robson, Byrness, Rochester ; second, £3, T. Elliot. BLACKEACED MOUNTAINS. Judges. — (As for Cheviots.) Rams of any age above two shear. — First prize, £6, C. Armstrong, Ashgillside, Alston (Mountain Heather) ; second, £4-, J. Lowdon, White Lees, Blanchland. Highly com- mended : H. Pliilipson, Side House, Allenheads. Two-shear rams. — First prize, £4', G. Gibson, Widdy Bank, Middleton-in-Teesdale (Champion) ; second, £2, T. Elliot. Pens of five ewes or gimmers. — Prize, £4, C. Armstrong. ANY OTHER DISTRICT BREED. (Except Border Leicester, Cheviot, and Blackfaced Mountain Sheep.) Judges : As for Cheviots and Blackfaced Mountain Sheep. Rams of any age. — Prize, £6, J. Wheeler, Long Compton, Sliipston-ou-Stour (Cotswold). Pens of five ewes or gimmers. — Prize, £5, F. T Turner, Armthorpei Doncaster (Lincoln). HORSES. AGRICULTURAL. Judges.— J. Blackstock, Hayton Castle, Cockermouth. W. Owen, Norris Green, West Derby. A. Turnbnll, Thornington, Cornwall. Brood mares with foal at foot. — First prize, £10, and a silver cup value £20 for the best brood mare competing in classes 28 and 29, and a silver cup value £56 for the best brood mare competing in classes 28 and 29 and the property of an exhibitor resident in the County of Northumberland only. Executors of the late G. Angus, Broomlfjr, Stocksfield (Darling); second, £5, J. and G. Atkinson, Bywell Hall Farm, Stocksfield (Damsel). Highly commended: T. H. Hutchinson, Manor House, Catterick (Jean). Brood mares, in foal at time of show. — First prize, £10, and second, £4, A. H. Hunt, Birtley, Chester-le-Street, Durham (Diamond and Polly). Commended : A. Elliott, Newhall, Galashields (Jean). Three-year-old geldings or fillies for agricultural purposes. — First prize, £10, and silver cup value £10, for the best colt, gelding, or fillv, competing in classes 30, 31, and 32, R. Lee, Tudhoe'Farra,' Spennymoor ; second, £4, T. Elliott. Highly commended : S. Jackj Mersington, Coldstream. Commended : R. Tweedie, The Forest, Catterick (Turk). Two-year-old geldings or fillies for agricultural purposes. — First prize, £8, R. Pyl, Burnthouse, North Shields (Prince) ; second, £4, J. Wilkinson, Cccklaw, Hexham. Yearling colts, geldings, or fillies, for agricultural purposes. —First prize, £8, J. and G. Atkiuson ; second, £4, T. P. Kirton, East House, Usworth. Commended : G. Dodds, En- campment, Cow Hill. Geldings of any age for agricultural purposes. — First prize, a silver cup value £10, for the best pair of geldings of any age, J. Tiiompson, Baillie Knowe, Kelso ; second, £2, R. Gibbons, Mossband, Carlisle. Pair of mares for agricultural purposes. — First prize, a silver cup value £10, J. Laycock, Gosforth, Newcastle; second, £2, J. Henderson, Horsley Hill, South Shields. Pair of horses or mares suitable for dray or colliery pur- poses.— First prize, a silver cup value £10, Carver and Co., Vict3ria Park, Manchester ; second, £5, the Earl of Tanker- ville, Chillingham Castle. EOR THE field. Judges.— Captain A. Thomson, Charlston, Fifesliire. Major Bell, Old Manor House, Bedale. W. Smith, Melkington, Cornhill. Brood mares with foal at loot or in foal at time of show, a silver cup value £25, and £10 in money.— L. C. Chrisp, Hawkhill, Alnwick (The Favourite) ; second, £5, J. Moffat, Kirkiington Park, Carlisle (Lady Line) ; third, £2, E. Hornby, Flotmanby, Ganton (Lady Derwent). Highly commended : T. Bell, Whorlton, Newcastle. Three-vear-old geldings for the field.— First prize, £5 and a silver cup, value £10, for the best gelding or filly competing in classes 37 and 38, R D;ind, jun., Hauxley Hall, Acklington (Daybreak) ; second, £3, J. Brown, Wig^onby, Wigton. Highly commended: T. Graham, Branlands Park, Irthington (Derby). Commended : G. A. Potter, Heaton Hall, New- castle (Derby). Three-year-old filKes fur the field. — First prize, £5, H. Elliot, Akeld, Wooler ; second, £3, the Duke of Northumber- land, Alnwick Castle. Highly commended : T. Bell (Lady Sarah). Two-year-old geldings for the field.— First prize, £o, Mrs. Cadogan, Brinkburu Priory, Morpeth ; second, £3, B. Sprag- gon, Nafferton, Stocksfield (Duke of Tjne). Highly com- mended : T. Graham, Brandland's Park, Irthington (Disraeli)- Two-year-old fillies for the field. — First prize, £5, J. D- Ogilvie,Mardon,Cornhill (Firefly) ; second, £3, J. G. Simpson. Mouldron, Richmond (May Queen). Highly commended: A. H. Browne, Doxford Hall, Chathill (Young Maid). Yearliug colls or geldiugs fur the field. — first prize,£o, and a silver cup, value £10, Earl Percy, M.P., Alnwick Castle; second, £3, J. Rickerby, Wallhead,Crosby-ou-Eden (Captain). Highly commended: J. Davison, jun., Trillington Hall, Mor- Yearling fillies for the field.— First prize, £5, J. Moffat, Kirkiington Park, Carlisle; second, £3, J. Paterson, Terrona, Langholm, N.B. (Oatcake). Hunters of any age, confined to the district comprising the county of Northumberland and Durham, and regularly hunted 100 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. thereia during the last season by the present owner. — First prize, a silver cup, value 35 guineas, and one-half of a sweep- stakes of 10s. each, T. C. Coxon, Newcastle (The Cannibal) ; second, £5, and one-half of the sweepstakes, J . W. Annett, Ulgham, Morpeth (Magician). Highly commended : R. Dand, jun., Hauxley Hall, A.cklington (Daylight). Hunters, five years old and under ten, qualified to carry not less than 15 stones with hounds. — First prize, a silver cup, value £35, and cue-half of a sweepstakes of 10s. each, J. Fearou, Corkickle, Whitehaven (Erl King) ; second, £5, and one-half of the sweepstakes, H. Jewison, Raisthorpe, York (Palmerstou). Highly commended: J. W. Annett (Clayton). Hunters, five years old and under ten, qualified to carry not less than 12 stones with hounds. — First prize, a silver cup, value £'25, and one-half of a sweepstakes of 10s. each, and champion cup, value £40, for the best hunter competing in classes 43, 4-4, 45, and 46, T. H. Hutchinson, Manor House, Catterick (Jester) ; second, £5, and one-half of the sweep- stakes, J. W. Annett (Nunnykirk). Highly commended: J. Tate, Barnhill, Acklington (Markab). Horses or mares, four years old. — First prize, a silver cup, value £25, and one-half of a sweepstakes of 10s. each, Sir G. Wombwell, Bart., Newburgh, York (Cawtou) ; second, £5, and half the sweepstakes, Mrs. A. H. Browne, Doxford Hall, Chathill (Seabreeze). Highly commended, E. Liddell, Morris Hall, Norham (Maydew). IIACKNEI'S. Judges. — W. S. Atkinson, Barrowby Hall, Woodlesford, Leeds. A. Calder, Yetholm Blains, Kelso. J. Parrington, Brancepeth, Durham. Horses or mares of any age, not exceeding 15-2 hands high , and equal to carry 14 stones. — First prize, a silver cup, value £35, C. G. Grey, Dilston, Corbridge (Jenny) ; second, £5, and a sweepstakes of 5s. each, C. J. Cuunngham, Tofts More- battle, Kelso (Zampa). Highly commended: T. Fattison, Norwood, Gateshead (Duchess) ; B. Spraggon, NafFerton, Stocksfield-on-Tyne (Duchess of Tyne). Commended: A. Hornsey, Stittenham, Sheriff Hutton (Young Agnes). Horses or mares of any age, not exceeding 14'2 hands high. ■ — First prize, a silver cup, value £25, W. H. Blackman, Wressle, Howdon, York (Fairy) ; second, ^5, and a sweep- stakes of 10s. each, C. Stephenson, V.S., Newcastle (Gipsy). Highly commended : C. Stephenson (Lady Florence). Com- mended : The Duke of Northumberland ; 11. Jefferson, Todds' Nook, Newcastle (Sam). PONIES. Judges. — (As for Hackneys). Horses or mares of any age, not exceeding 13 hands 2 inches high. — First prize, a silver cup, value £15, and a sweepstakes of 5s. each, C. W.Wilson, High Park, Kenda (Bobby) ; second, £4, J. C. Straker, Willington House Durham (Sprite) ; third, £2, E. Bell, Westgate-road, New castle (Jessy). Highly commended: C. W. C. Henderson Leazes House, Durham. Horses or mares of any age, not exceeding 12 hands high. — rirst prize, a silver cnp, value ^10, R. Deuchar, Newcastle ; second, £4, M. Nixon, Earsdon Moor, Morpeth ; third, £3, H. F. Swan, North Jesmond, Newcastle (Kittie). Highly commended. Sir W. G. Armstrong, C.B., Cragside, Roth- bury. CARIIIAGE HOKSES. Judges. — (As for Hackney Ponies). Horses or mares, three or four years old. — First prize, £10, J. Johnson, Brighaia, Driffield (Rob Roy) ; second, £5, II. A. Clarke, Prospect House, Aspatria (Emma). Highly com- ineuded, J. Wilson, Woodhorn Manor, Morpeth. PIGS. Judges. — J. B. Booth, Killerby Hall, Catterick. J. Fisher, Carhead, Cross Hills, Leeds. W. Goodrich, Dilston, Corbridge-on-Tyno. Boars of the large wliite breed of any age. — First prize, £5, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds, Littleborougli, Manchester ; second, £7, J. Dove, Hambrook House, Bristol (Lord Ilam- brook). Boars of the small white breed of any age. — First prize, £5, and a silver cup value £10, for the best pig competing in classes 52, 53, 54, 55, 5G, 57, 58, 59, and 60, C. R. N. Bes- wicke-Royds ; second, £2, J. Dove (King Thistle). Boars of the Berkshire breed of any age. — First prize, £5, and highly commended, J. Wheeler, Long Corapton, Shipston- on-Stour; second, £4, T. Wilson, Shotley Hull, Siiotley- bridge. Sows of the large white breed of any age. — First prize, £5, R. E. Duckeriug, Northorpe, Kirtou LinJsey ; second, £3, T. Hodgson, Newton Arlosh, Wigtou. Highly commended, J. Bulman, Carleton Hill, Carlisle (Chicken-Eater). Sows of the small white breed of any age. — First prize, £5, R. E. Duckering; second, £3, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds. Highly commended, J. Dove. Sows of the Berkshire breed of any age. — First prize, £5, T. Wilson, Siiotley Hall, Shotley-bridge ; second, £3, J. Wheeler, Long Compton, Shipston-on-Stour. Highly com- mended, J. Ismay, Whickham, Gateshead. Sows of a breed not eligible for the preceding classes, of any age. — I'irst prize, £5, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds ; second, £3, R. E. Duckering. Highly commended, J. J. Wheeler (Jenny). Highly commended and commended, J. Dove (Queen's Little Beauty) and (Shamrock). Three Sow pigs of the large breed, of any colour, under 16 weeks old. — First prize, £3, J. Taylor, Ireby Mills, Wigton. Highly commended, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds. Three Sow pigs of the small breed, of any colour, under 16 weeks old. — I'lrst prize, £3, T. Wilson, Shotley Hall. SHEPHERD'S DOGS. Judges. — (As for Cheviots, black-faced mountain sheep, and sheep of any breed). Rough-haired dogs of any age. — First prize, £3, and a silver cup, value £5 for the best dog or bitch competing in Classes 61, G3, and 63, T. R. Stephenson, West Keilder (Mos) ; second, £3, J. J. TurnbuU, Hindhope, Jedburgh (Hemp) ; third, £1, A. Robson, Emmethaugh (Tom). Rough-haired bitches of any age. — First prize, £3, A. Scott Byrness, Rochester ; second, £3, F. Burn, Hardacres, Cold- stream (Maria) ; third, £1, T. Brown, Alnham, Alnwick, (Gip). Highly commended, T. Purvis, Woodhorn, Morpeth (Moss). Smooth-haired dogs or bitches of any age. — First prize, £3, A. Wilson, Clock Mill, Caphaeton (Meg) ; second, £2, R. S. Lamb, Acorn Bank, Bedlington (Fan) ; third, £1, R. Foggan, Bedlington, Morpeth (Lead) ; highly commended, J. Ryder, 9, Providence-place, Newcastle (Moss) ; T. Pringle, High Buston (Beauty) ; R. Smith, Preston, Chathill (Sweep) ; com- mended, R. Harrett, Kirkwhelpingtoii, Newcastle (Keeper). WOOL. Judge. — Mr. Joseph Humble, Newcastle-on-Tyne. Five fleeces of Border Leicester Wool. — First prize, £3, and second, £1, G. Laing, Wark, Coldstream Five fleeces of half-bred Wool. — ^First prize, £2, second £1, R. Donkiu, Ingrams, Alnwick. i'ive fleeces of Cheviot Wool.— First prize, £3, T. Elliot, Ilindhope, Jedburgh ; second, £1, R. Donkin. Five fleeces of Black-faced Wool. — First prize, £2, and second, £1, the Earl of Tankerville, Chillingham Castle. SALE OF SHOW STOCK AT BEDFORD.— Mr. Fowler's yearling Shorthorn bull, by Prince Regent, to Mr. Marcus Pool, for France ; Mr. W. G. Game's yearhng Short- horn, Aachen, to Mr. Herman Stedman, for Germany ; Mr. C. J. Webb's Shorthorn bull-calf. Royal Oxford Gwynne, to Mr. Simon Beattie, for Canada, who also takes out Mr. G. Game's Shortliorn cow, Butterfly's Duchess, and Mr. Outli- waite's two-year-old Shorthorn heifer. Baroness Conyers. Further, Mr. Downing's yearling Shortliorn heifer, and l\Ir. Mumford's two-year-old Siiorthorn heifer, Edith Emily, go to Canada in charge of Mr. Craig ; and Messrs. Dudding's Shorthorn calf. Pride of Beauty, to Chili, In consequence of the laws with regard to cattle disease, there can be no ex- portation of stock to Australia until 1875, but several offers were made lor animals to be kept over until next summer. A bid of a tliousand guineas for Mr. Bruce Kennard's famous Shorthorn heifer. Queen Mary, was quickly refused ; while just previous to the show Colonel Loyd Lindsay sold Rob Roy to Mr. Richard Stratton. From amongst the Jerseys Mr. Simpson's famous Pretty Lass goes from Wray Park to Wobum Abbey, having been purchased for the Duke of Bed- ford. Two of Lord Walsingham's shearling Southdown rams go to Chili at high prices, and good ofl'eis were refused for other entries for the same flock; whilst there was also some trade for abroad amongst the Cotswolds. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 101 EAST OV ENGLAND HORSE MJiETING AT SUDBURY. SHOW. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES. — RiDiJMG HoESKS, Hunters, and Ponies : W. Lort, The Cotteridge, King's Norton ; W. Cropper, Ilorn- castle. Agricultural IIorses : W. Baker, Atherstone ; C. Hellaby, Braniecote Ilall, Atherstone. Weight-carrying hunters. — First prize, cup value £20 and £10 iu money, J. Goodhff (Marshal McMahon) ; second, £10, T. Harper, Beverley. Commended: P. Fonnereau (Lucifer). Light weight liunters. — Pirst prize, cup value £10 and £10 iu money, J. Grout (Bonner) ; second, £8, P\ Lumbarde (Tiie Count). Highly commended: J. Goodliit' (Lady Mary); E. Low (Theodore); A. BuUard (King of Trumps). Com- mended : J. T. Blott (Lothiau Queen) ; E. Low (Quick Step). Hunters uot exceeding four years. — Prize, cup value 15 gs., J. Goodliff (Lady Mary), llighly commeuded: A. S. An- drews, AValthamstow (Romeo). Commended : J. W. Wakelin, Braintree (Challenger). Thoroughbred stallion. — First prize, cup value 13 gs., W. Wilson (Hotshot) ; second, £5, the Duke of Hamilton (The Beadel). Commended: J. Grout (Ashantee). Hackney or roadster stallion. — First prize, cup value 12 gs., W. Giddens (Great Gun) ; second, £5, J. Grout (Quicksilver). Highly commended : F. Bran white (Defiance). Commended: Phillips, Smith, and Co., and Special Prize (Condiment). Hackney or roadster mare or gelding. — First prize, cup value £10 and £5 in money, T. Buuyard (Princess) ; second, £5, T. Hudson (Peter). Highly commeuded : W. Giddens (Giddy Girl). Commended: Rev. J. Foster, Foxearth (Madge). Park hacks or ladies' horses. — First prize, cup value £10 and £5 in money (if wou by a lady a riding whip will be pre- sented), R. Cooke ; second, £5, T. D. Taylor, The Grange, Bury St. Edmund's (Perfection). Highly commended : P. Fonnereau (Eagle Eye) ; W. S. Postle (Lady Jane Grey) ; C. R. Harvey (Alice). Cobs not exceeding 14 hands 3 in. — First prize, cup value £10 and £5 in money, T. Mitchell (Bosco) ; second, J. R. Vaizey, Attwoods, Halsted (Marquis). Highly commended : T. D. Taylor (Perfection). Commended : H. Skingsley, Wakes Hall (Tommy). Saddle or harness filly or colt, under four years. — Prize, £G, Rev. J. Foster (Tommy). Commended : C. Scott (Pretty Girl). Ponies not exceeding 13 hands 3 in. — First prize, cup value £5 and £3 iu money, T. Mitchell, Bradford (Bosco) ; second, £4, C. Gates, Hepworth, Seoles (Lord Tom Noddy). Highly commended : C. H. Daking, Bower House, Boxford (Sweep) ; S. C. Roper (Rocket) ; the Duchess of Hamilton (Ambitious) ; T.D.Taylor (Black Bess). Agricultural or cart stallion, any age. — First prize, cup value 12 gs., T. Briggs (Heart of Oak) ; second, £5, J. Ketley (Talbot). Highly commeuded : W. Byford (The Statesman). Agricultural or cart colt, under four years. — First prize, £6, T. Briggs (Heart of Oak) ; second, £3, W. Byford (The Statesman), llighly commended : W. G. Walford. Agricultural or cart mare, over four years. — Prize, £6, R. Makins, Barking (Moggy). Highly commended: W. Byford (Bragg). Commended: W. Byford (Pride). Agricultural or cart filly, under four years. — Prize, cup value 5 gs., W. Cross (Kathleen). Highly commended : W. Byford. Special prize of £5 for the best foal by The Beadle. — F. J. Rack ham. Special prize of £5 for the best foal by Chaucer. — J. Humphreys. Commended: A.Smith. Special prize of 3 gs. for the best yearling colt or filly by Little Pippin. — T. Kilburn. Commended : Rev. R. H. Long- den (Pippin). Special prize of 3 gs. for the best foal by Little Pippin. — W. Oakey. Special prize of 5 gs. for the best foal by Defiance. — F. Brauwhite. Special prize of £3 for the best foal by Volunteer. — First prize, £3, W. Byford ; second, £2, W. Byford. Jumping over single and double hurdles. — F'irst prize, cup value 6 gs., C. II. Daking (Sweep) ; second, £3, E. Payne, Brockley (Peter). Commended : W. Cross, Toy Lodge, Prating. Jumping ever fence aud water. — First prize, cup value 8 gs., T. Alston, jun., Stausted Hall, Sudbury (Telegraph) ; second, £4, E. Faux, Heybridge Hall. Highly commended : Mrs. Kate Radcliff (Kwei). Commended: G. A. CouIsod, Fingriuhoe (Peggy) ; E. Payne (Peter) ; F. C. Payne (Sailor). JUDGING BY "POINT S." At the show of the Scotch Midland Agricultural So- ciety at Kinross, a feature which had been looked for- ward to with some degree of interest was tiie compe- tition for Lord Kinnaird's prize of £10 for Shorthorns, cows or heifers, judged by points. His Lordship solicited the services of three well-known judges of stock, who, believing themselves in the system, agreed to act. These were Mr. James Whjte, Clintarty, Aberdeenshire ; Mr. Robert Bruce, Newton of Struthers, Forres ; and Mr. George Hedley, Newcastle-on- Tyne. They met Lord Kinnaird at Rossie Priory on Wednesday, the day before the show, and, after a full discussion, agreed upon a code and scale of 26 points, with an aggregate of numbers amounting to 200. The difliculty in fixing the scale arose from the fact of Mr. Hedley, who had written at some length on the subject, having given a scale at 85. The Scotch gentlemen desired a greater extension of numbers, but, ultimately coming to a mutual understanding, they fixed as mentioned. With a view to arrive at a clear operative conception of the plan laid out in their award paper they adjourned to Castlehill, the Home Farm, and there each independently and separately, took to judging three of Lord Kinnaird's cows ou the principle agreed on. They diltVred a very little on one cow, but as a whole they arrived at a pretty close approximation to each other, being within four numbers. Although Mr. Hedley was not confident as to the scale adopted, they were firmly decided on the justice of judging by points. In this spirit they went to the sliowyard, aud entered on their duties without hesitation. An award paper was printed with the points and scale ; and fifteen or sixteen animals were entered. Four of these were entered direct for the special competition, while the others were entered from other classes. Whatever was the reason, only eight of the number were brought before tiie judges, and of these one was disqualified at the outset, as its age was not given. After the seven had been carefully examined the prize was awarded to Bonny Belle, aged four years and a month, bred by the exhibitor, Mr. Thomas M. Tod, West Brackly, Kinross, which had also won in the ofl'-hand judging the second prize. The second iu order was a heifer, aged three yearn and twcnfy-five days, bred by Mr. Copland, and owned by Mr. Alexander lleid, Cruivie ; and the third was a cow, aged 3 years, bred by exhibitor, Mr. Robert Husbaud, Gillot, Duul'ermliue. The cow belonging to Mr. A. Bethune, Blebo, whicii was selected for first honours by the previous judges, was rejected ou account of her very uneven foim aud patchy hindquarters. 102 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. THE POWER OF THE LABOURERS. By an East Essex Fakmer. Under the above heading an article from the pen of one of the strongest, though it may be added one of the fairest of the partizans of the Labourers' Union is pub- lished in the current number of the Fortnightly Review. We entirely agree with the writer in his remarks upon the impolicy of the lock-out, which from the first we have unequivocally condemned. The lock-out is a move- ment against the very life of unionism, and not, as its advocates plead, simply an opposition to the abuses of the existing Unions. The obstinate refusal of the Far- mers' Association to sanction a conference which would have taken into consideration not only the disputed question of wages, but the rules and tactics of the Unions also is, sufficient evidence in proof of this state- ment. Piece-meal strikes, strikes without notice, and abrupt and uncourteous ultimata sent in by Union dele- gates might have been opposed without resorting to an onslaught upon the Union as an organization. By resorting to such an attempt to force the men out of an association which is perfectly legitimate, and which might be conducted in a spirit of fairness and courtesy, we have repeatedly urged that the farmers have been fighting against their own interests. One inevitable result has been, as we from the first declared that it would be, to diminish the number of men in the lock-out districts, and thus to give them an advantage in accordance with the principle of supply and de- mand that they bad not previously enjoyed. Even if the masters should succeed in driving the men tem- porarily out of the Union, the " armed peace" which would ensue would be nothing better than " veiled re- bellion," and there would be nothing to prevent a recur- rence to the real or supposed advantages of unionism, with an accession of energy and bitterness as soon as a favourable opportunity offered. The men might be temporarily discouraged by defeat, but they would soon see that the result of the contest had really been a gain to them by the removal of many competitors from the labour market. As this must inevitably be the result of evsry lock-out, it requires no extraordinary discrimination to enable anyone who thinks at all to see that such an apparent victory as has been supposed would in reality be a defeat, or a preparation for it. Like the hero who, often stricken to the earth, acquired increased vigour at each contact, the labourers will emerge from every lock- out with an increased power in the wage market, and, consequently, in the ability to contribute to the funds of their unions. But whilst we go so far with Mr, Cox, we cannot agree with him in his exoneration of the leaders of the Unions from all blame on account of the language and tactics which they at first chose to adopt, but which have been considerably moderated, with some exceptions, under the pressure of the strong power of opposition manifested by the farmers. Especially we part company with him in his attempt to whitewash The Labourers' Union Chronicle, which most unprejudiced people regard as the bete noir of the labourers' movement. Nothing has done so much to inflame the passions of the two parties to the contest that has been so long j; ling on as the immoderate abuse, gross misrepresentation, and the slightly veiled threats of violent resolution that have appeared almost every week in the journal of the National Agricultual Labourers' Association. From the first publication of the paper — long previous to the appearance of the famoiis " beacon fires" and " midnight surprises" article, which even the staunchest adherents of the Union protested against, down to the implied threat of a possible massacre a la Nero of monopolist landowners in The Chronicle of July 4th — the leading columns of that paper have been filled with the most gross vituperation of " brutal" and " bloody" farmers, lying editors, fibbing ladies (or rather a fibbing lady), and laudlord robbers. Editors of papers friendly to the movement, or impartial and amicable, have been abused by name, and in one case at least have been accused of the " lie direct," simply because they could not go all fours with the wild schemer who in most eccentric English rages weekly in the first page of The Chronicle. The smallest spark is sufficient to ignite his excessively inflammable tinder, and we can only imagine that he is one of those unfortunately constituted persons who can only write when their pens are dipped in fire and brimstone. We could give extracts enough to fill two or three numbers of this Journal in justification of the conclusion, arrived at from no preconceived prejudice, that The Labourers' Union Chronicle is a discredit to the Labourers' Union and to the modern Press. To plead its independence of the Union is idle as long as it is not disowned as the special journal of the association, which it claims to be, and as long as its editor is a treasurer of the Union. It is better to be one •f those whom Mr. Cox condemns as " lukewarm friends of the Union," than to be such a red-hot partizan as to condoue vulgar abuse, gross exaggeration, and suggestions of agrarian outrage on the " don't put him in the horse- pond" principle. As to the Union delegates, they have no doubt had a great deal to irritate them. From the first they have been assailed with abuse, and, in some instances, with calumny. But we cannot agree with Mr. Cox in thinking that they have generally shown a " marvellous self-restraint," or that their demands and their conduct have been characterized by a " general tone of fairness and moderation." With the object of exciting the feelings of the men and obtaining fresh members, they have often given way to culpable exaggera- tion and misrepresentation. They have systematically underrated the earnings of the labourers, most unfairly refusing to take into account any extras beyond the ordi- nary weekly wages, whether in the form of money pay- ment or perquisites and exemptions. This has been done with the object of enlisting the sympathy of the public ; but now that the world has been informed that the labourers in the Newmarket and Bury districts (probably a fair average as to wages of the whole of England) earn 17s. per week more or less throughout the year, with cottages and gardens at low rents and other advantages, they can no longer remain under the false impression that the countay labourer is worse off' then the unskilled workman of our provincial towns and many of our chief cities. A rural labourer, paid so much as stated, is better off than a town workman who gets a guinea a week, and there are thousands of town workmen who get considerably less than that amount. In making these remarks it is not our object to urge that the farm labourers should not try to improve their po- sition, but only to show that much public sympathy has been obtained for the men by the leaders and officials of the Unions by means of a systematic misrepresentation and suppression of the truth. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 103 Cue demand made by the leaders of the Union, accompanied by the threat that, if it were not acceded to, England should be drained of her agricultural labourers, has done not a little to strengthen the resistance of the farmers to the Unions. We refer to the demand for three or four acres of land for every farm labourer. Pro- bably Mr. Cox, and many other Union partizans who know little or nothing of the exigences of practical agri- culture, consider this to be a perfectly reasonable de- mand, and one that should be acceded to by landowners and farmers. But every farmer knows that a labourer with so much land to cultivate on his own account would be almost useless as a hired workman. His services would, to a very small extent, if at all, be available to the farmer in the busy agricultural seasons ; and it would only be in slack times, when his labour was but little needed, that he would be willing to engage iu regular work for hire. If the Uuions aad their friends had turned their attention to the develop- ment of agricultural co-operation, instead of to this impracticable scheme, some good might have resulted. As Mr. Brassey, iu a thoughtful and suggessive article on " Co-operative Production," iu the current number of the Conlemporarij Review, has obseved, co-operation, if successful, would not only benefit directly those con- cerned in it, but would also afford to other labourers a correct idea as to a fair division of profits between capi- talists and labourers, and would thus stimulate just, and discourage extravageut demands. In deprecating the expatriation of our farm labourers, Mr. Cox insists that they are by no means too numerous to cultivate the land of this country as it should be cul- tivated. Hero he is probably correct ; but before it will be safe for the tenaut-farmer to increase his investments by adopting a more liberal system of tillage, including an increased expenditure for labour, he must have that legal security for his capital which is at present so unjustly and mischievously denied to him. THE FARMERS' FRIENDS IN ENGLAND AND IRELAND. TO THE EDITOR OF THE MARK LANE EXPRESS. Sir, — It may be said to have been a settled arrange- ment with the English farmers previous^to the late general election that when the time came they would endeavour to turn out the Gladstone Ministry, and permit of a Conservative Miuisti'y comingi n. The election arrived, and the thing was done. Everywhere over England the counties returned Conservative representatives, and, gene- rally speaking, they were either returned unpledged, or only pledged to attend to farmers' interests in the most slipshod manner. There were general rejoicings among farmers at the Conservative success. The Conservatives in Opposition had been urgent for Malt-Tax repeal, for Local-Taxation reform, and their leader, Mr. Disraeli, at the last moment almost, had stated that the priceless boon of a two- years' notice to quit ought, in all fairness and justice to tenants, to be conceded. On the other hand, Mr. Clare Sewell Read, the all-England tenant-farmers' representative, had pronounced in favour of protection to his class in contracting with their landlords. This was the situation when the Conservative Budget was introduced. On the Local Taxation difficulty it offered a composition of almost eleven-pence three-farthings in the pound, and in the matter of Malt-Tax repeal, it — but let a veil be now drawn over this part of the subject. Then there intervened Mr. Ward Hunt's big speech about rotten ships, and what he was resolved to do for the honour and the glory of the navy of England, followed by the speech of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, in which he quietly snuffed out Mr. Ward Hunt, rotten ships, and all the rest of it. By this the farmers were given time to recover their equanimity, and they did recover it somewhat. Mr. Clare Sewell Read, too, had become connected with the Ministry, and every Conserv- ative tenant in England believed in Mr. Read. The hope now lay in Mr. Seely's motion, "That outgoing tenants should be compensated for unexhausted improvements." The proposition appeared so just, and moreover, so en- tirely in consonance with Conservative landlord pro- fessions, that no opposition, far less any dodge against the proposal on the part of the " farmers' friends," was anticipated. In the best informed circles, therefore, it was believed there would be an overwhelming majority in its favour ; and oh ! how every farmer congratulated his neighbour on the intelligence and the foresight which had put Messrs. Disraeli and Co, into power. Amid these jubilations, Mr, Seely's motion was intro- duced, and, 0 tempora ! 0 mores ! what then hap- pened ? First, there was all but a general stampede among the farmers' representatives, aud the narrowest possible escape made from a Parliamentary "count out!" And — tell it not in Gath, whisper it not in the streets of Askalon — iu the second place, Mr. Disraeli, while con- ceding to outgoing tenants the right to compensation, de- clared in favour of " free contracts," as a necessary accompauiment of the concession. What, he exclaimed, " force men into contracts from which human nature recoils !" And so Mr. Clare Sewell Read was snuflfedout, as Mr. Ward Hunt was snuffed out — the only consolation left to Mr. Read being, that it had taken a greater per- sonage to snuif him out than it had taken to snuff Mr. Ward Hunt out ! Sei'iously, what does this enunciation of Mr. Disraeli in regard to ''contracts from which human nature recoils," mean ? Evidently this — that landlords are to be allowed to remain virtually in the position in which they are in at present — free to preserve game upon their tenants' crops ; free to exercise the law of distress upon their tenants' goods ; free to evict their tenants and to seize upon and confiscate their property iu their im- provements on their farm ; and free, under the pressure of the notice to quit, to enforce penal and feudal and arbitrary contracts upon the farmers upon their estates. There will, in every probability, be legislation upon the subject of Mr. Seely's motion. The " mountain will go into labour and bring forth a mouse" — a permission Act. The Irish tenants got their permission Land Act four years ago, and the Duke of Leinster and others have been enforcing arbitrary, penal, and confiscatory contracts upon their tenants, under its jirovisions, ever since. The English tenants will be given a similar bauble. There will be a great blowing of Conservative and landlord trumpets, a session of Parliament in great part wasted, as in the Irish case, and the upshot of all will be that the English farmers will be presented by the aristo- cratic representatives whom they had the unaccountable folly to elect — with the shadow for the substance ! But all this criticism comes from an Irish tenant, you or your readers might object. And why not from an Irish tenant ? For nigh thirty years, to my know- ledge, Irish tenants, and more particularly those of the Irish provinces of Leinster, Munster, and Connaught, have been sending representatives to Parliament who, in 104 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. almost every iastance ia whicli an opportuuity was af- forded them, voted to emancipate the English tenants and the English people from the banc of landlord power and feudal oppression. And what has been the return ? The election, year after year, by English tenants, during that long period, of Conservatives and landlords as their representatives — of men who never yet willingly yielded a single concession to tenants, whether English or Irish — of men who have so governed as to have all but ruined Ireland — of men who have sat still and seen the Irish population reduced by nigh three millions — of men who have never proposed a thorough remedial measure with the view of arresting the depopulation process, and of men who, when a Land Act (1870) was introduced into Parliament, with the intention of doing at least some- thing in the way of giving security to the Irish tenant, and thereby inducing him to improve in the cultivation of the soil, did everything which men could do to emascu- late that Act and make it what it now is, and what the promised English Land Act will be when it is passed, a sham, a delusion, and a snare 1 And hence, therefore, why I, an Irish tenant, dare to criticise as above and to point out to English tenants that they, by the repre- sentatives which they elect, are not only acting to their own detriment and in the way of obstruction to their own interests, but by the number of Conservative mem- bers which they return — of men trained in arbitrary principles and accustomed to high-handed conduct, are swamping the Irish popular representation, and thus rendering futile all the efforts of the Irish tenants to ob- tain laws which would tend to their emancipation from feudal oppression and confiscation — which would give them security in their homes and in the possession there of any property created by them in the improvement of their farms, and which would stimulate them to double tlie annual produce from the soil, and so annually double the present income of the country. Your obedient servant, Thomas Robertson. Narrafjhmore, Athy, %tli Juhj. THE IMPLEMENTS IN THE WEST. At a meeting of tlie council of the Royal Cornwall Agricul- tural Association, at Truro, the following report on the imple- ments and macliines in motion at the Royal Cornwall Agricul- tural Exhibition held at St. Austell, in June last, was pre- sented : 1st. The exhibition of implements and machines was larger than on any former occasion, and our attention was called by exhibitors to sundry improvements, particularly in reaping and mowing machines, too numerous to mention in this brief report. 2nd. Seven mowers were tried — viz., Wood's, Samuelson's, Hornsby's, Picksley and Sims', Kirby's, Brenton's, and Oatey's. All worked well considering the rough surface of the land and the nature of the grass. 3rd. The stewards do not feel justi- fied in giving anything more than a general report of such limited trials, which are simply calculated to give the public an opportunity of seeing such machines at work, and judging for themselves ; but both the exhibitors and tlie public were much disappointed in not finding means either in rye, winter oats, and some such crops for testing tlie reapers, and more especially the self-delivery, which they are of opinion only re- quires to be seen at work to be appreciated, and will eventually become the machine of the day, and strongly recommend that some such crop as named be provided at the time of the exhi- bition, and likewise grass forced by artificial manure or other means, to make tlie test more effectual, it being generally known that all machines will cut ordinary crops ; or, other- wise, that an extensive periodical trial of mowing and reaping machines, with Uberal prizes, be held in the early part of the harvest, as it would stimulate improvements in this important class of machinery, and also give inexperienced persons oppor- tunities of learning now to work them properly, a matter of very great importance. 4tli. Mr. Davey's patent climax double-furrow, turn-wrest plough did its work admirably, and it surprised most people to see two small horses pulling it through a dry, stiff piece of land overgrown with couch grass, rest harrow, and other kinds of weeds. The easy manner in which it is made to plough two furrows down tlie hill and one up, cannot fail to recommend itself to any practical agricul- turist, as being superior to other implements of the class. 6th. Recent improvements in Marsden's stoue-breakiug machine, which was at work in the show-yard, appeared to have ren- dered it almost perfect, by reducing the material to a uniform size and reducing waste to a minimum, and in consequence of the excited state of the labour market, we think its introduction would be a very important auxiliary for all highway districts. 6th. We particularly noticed two sets of six-horse power steam thrashinfr-macbines in motion on the ground by Marshall, Sons, and Co., of Gainsborough, which appeared to possess almost all recent improvements, wliile any part getting out of order can easily he repaired. And we are of opinion tliat they are taking a fair and good stand in the county of Cornwall, which, from the many recent improvements adapted to this county, they are justly entitled to. 7tli. There was likewise the washing, wringing, and mangling machine combined, from Messrs. Thos. Bradford and Co,, High llolborn, London, and also from the Domestic Washing Macbine Co., Ackrington, in full work, and appeared to give general satisfaction to the domestic part of the visitors. — TiiOMAS Olver, T. Baron, Stewards. The meeting of the Association for 1875, when the Prince of Wales is President, will be held at Truro. THE STOCK YARDS AND TRANSIT HOUSE OF CHICAGO, ILLINOIS. to the editor of the maek lane express. Sir, — Some three or four years ago I gave you a description of these extensive yards, and the amount of stock they contained. Since then they have very much increased, and there are now upwards of 1 GO acres under plank aud in sheds, while the new building now called the Exchange is one of magnificence, and the green lawn, with its shady trees fenced round with substantial iron railing, in the centre of the yard, has a picturesque appearance. The bank occupies a portion of this building, offices for the company, and separate olhces for individual stockmen and packers. I think I can say that there is not such another institution as this in the world. When I wrote you previously, the best cattle were more of the " native " character than now ; great improvement has been made during that time, many of the pens of to-day aud yester- day are half-breds aud higher grades of the improved breeds, the greater majority being Shorthorns, but few of them of Duke or Duchess descent, as they are too ex- pensive for beef and too scarce to be profitable. The Texas cattle are very much improved since I wrote you, although most of them are still pure in their native state ; their feeders have learnt to put much more beef upon them. They are now sent into Colorado, Kansas, Iowa, and Illinois, to be made up for market, by which they are wonderfully improved in character, and if feed should stiU add more to their bloom in the future, there may THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 105 yet be a sale of such thorougiibrecls. The following is a table of the weekly record : Weekly Kecokd of Texan Cattle Sold at Union Stock Yards in 1873. Date. January 4 11 „ 18 „ 25 No. February , Marcli April May Juae July 15 22 29 5 12 19 2G 3 10 .17 , 34 , 31 , 7 , 14 . 21 , 28 . 5 . 12 . 19 . 26 August 3 „ 9 , 16 » 23 30 Septenaber ... G ... 13 ... 20 ... 27 October 4 » 11 „ 18 » "-^ November 1 „ 8 , 15 „ 22 ,. 29 December G ... 13 ... 20 ... 27 ... 31 Total.. 1,013 1,096 1,327 1,62G 1,529 1,312 943 1,302 1,536 1,460 1,340 1,655 1,829 1,353 3,348 1,510 3,441 1,906 2,074 1,837 1,643 3,893 3,807 3,040 4,329 3,977 2,447 3,6GL 4,45 G 3,221 3,078 6,238 5,513 5,181 4,100 5,591 4,169 6,809 4,947 4,443 3,789 8,923 5,609 6,018 3,467 3,031 1,966 960 2,448 4,456 1,444 960 611 Extreme Range. dols.cts. dols.cts. 3 00 to 4 50 3 00 4 75 2 62 4 33 3 25 4 75 2 35 1 50 3 00 3 45 3 75 3 63 3 40 2 00 3 25 2 00 2 00 1 80 1 25 1 60 1 62 1 75 1 85 1 35 4 75 4 35 4 63 4 50 5 00 4 75 5 00 5 25 5 50 5 20 5 13 5 50 5 25 5 35 5 20 5 00 4 87 5 50 4 90 5 50 4 75 5 35 4 50 4 60 5 00 4 90 4 40 4 63 4 50 5 62 5 15 5 10 4 90 156,990 Average. dols.cts. 3 68 3 83| 3 61J 3 59^ 24| 45f 76t 83 9G 93 23 65 4 87 4 44 4 35 4 73 4 GO 4 00 4 15 3 90f 4 01 4 07 3 45 3 63 3 38 3 48 3 03L 2 91" 2 S3 2 92 3 34 3 10 2 49 2 65 3 83 3 47 3 58 Soams, buys upwards of live thousand hogs per week during the year for the firm of Johu P. Squires and Co., East Cambridge, Mass. These are principally shipped to the English market iu the shape of bacon, hams, and lard. This is one of the best business men in the country ; his judgment is excellent, not only in stock, but in the spot selected for his house, which he has built iu the most substantial manner ; it is a mansion fit for a prince. Tlie material iu wood is of black walnut, and the interior cor- responds with the exterior. I have been through many of the first-class houses in Chicago, but none that has pleased mc more. It is ample to receive his many friends, and it is their own fault if they do not feel at home, for his desire is to make them so, supported by his better half. I spent the past two evenings there, and never met a more happy family, for the wholehouse is kept iu order. Not only this, his eldest daughter, Mrs. G. W. Dean, came from New York to spend part of the summer with her parents, and I was delighted to hear her play and sing. This was cheering to me in my seventy-first year, and I shall embrace the kind invitation of another visit. The whole establishment is under the superintendence of Mr. John B. Sherman, and, though so extensive, every- thing is done with the regularity of clockwork. The Transit House is kept by Messrs. Tucker and Sherman, and it corresponds with the whole — viands substantial and good, waiters attentive aud good, and charges very moderate. In connection with this establishment is the race-course, called Dexter Park, where are two tracks for running and trotting equal to any iu this country. The running races have been held here tliis week, alfording much sport ; the trotting to be held on the 21st inst., and three follow- ing days, when some of the fastest horses iu tlie country are expected. I am, dear sir, yours, &c.. Transit House Stock Yards, \\m. H. Sotiiam. Chicago, Jul;/ Mli, 1874. 1 50 4 15 3 61 1 50 3 87 3 43 1 40 3 GO 2 58 1 60 4 50 3 01 1 50 4 75 3 90| 1 75 4 55 3 83 1 55 4 40 2 83 1 75 4 00 3 85 3 00 4 25 3 30 3 35 4 30 3 51 3 34 4 86 3 58 Some of the stock in the yards to-day are first-class beef; thick in flesh. The sheep market is not so extensive as cattle and hogs, of which the following will give you some idea as to the extent : A friend of mine, Mr. John THE SHORTHORN HERD BOOK. At a meeting of the Committee at the house of Lord Penrhyn, on July 23rd, there were present : The Earl of Dunmore, Lord Penrhyn, Col. Kingscote, the Eev. J. Storer, Mr. Chandos Pole Gell, Mr. Hugh Aylmer, aud Mr. T. C. Booth. The formation and constitution of the Society was fully discussed, and it was decided to enlarge the number of the Committee to thirty ; Mr. Harward, as Honorary Secretary, being directed to communicate with the gentle- men proposed to be added to the Committee. It was decided to form the Society (under the provisions of the Act) on the basis of a company formed for the purpose of carry- ing out a specific object without profit, and not as an ordinary trading Company. The articles of association were fully discussed, and the leading principles adopted. A draft of the proposed agreement with Mr. Strafford was also fully discussed and adopted, and this has since been sent to Mr. Stratford for his approval. Circulars are to be sent to all Shorthorn breeders, briefly detailing the purposes of the Society, aud inviting them to become members. The Committee decided not to entertain any question as to the appointmeut of editor or other otiicers for the present. In nominating these new members, the Committee were desirous of having the various districts in which Short- horns are bred, and the breeders of difl'erent families adequately represented. 106 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE THE OUTGOING TENANT. Nisi Prius Court, Tuesday. — Before Lord Chief Justice Coleridge and a Special Jury. *Af/,i>isoi/ V. Jli/ief. Mr. Cole and Mr. Collins were counsel for the plaintiff, and Mr. Lopes and Mr. Murch for tlie defendant. Mr. Collins opened the pleadings, the action being to recover the value of an outgoing crop of wheat of ten acres. — Mr. Cole said the plaintiff in this case, Mr. Atkinson, was a farmer, and he had brought an action against his landlord, JMr. Minet, who had since died, so that tlie action was now brought against his eldest daughter as executrix. The facts of the case were very simple. In 18i'2 tlie plaintiff entered into an agreement with Mr. Minet to grant him tl\e lease of Revel's Farm, tlie tenant a*' that time being Mrs. Kinsman. The tenancy was to com- mence on Lady-day, and it was arranged that the plaintiff should pay the outgoing tenant for the crop of wheat which had been sown — about £130 — and it was stated in the agree- ment that when the plaintiff went out of possession lie was to be entitled to take off a crop of wheat not exceeding ten acres. The parties acted upon this agreenent for seven years, but at the end of that time no fresh agreement was made, and the tenancy was afterwards yearly until 1855, wlien a fresh lease was drawn up for another term. This expired in 1869, and from that time until 1873 the plaintiff went on a yearly tenancy, p.iying his rent from year to year. The tenancy expired at Lady-day, 1872, and then, of course, when the plaintiff was about to leave he looked to be paid for his outgoing crop of wheat in the same manner as he had paid when he entered on the farm. It appeared the landlord, Mr. Minet, liad the notion that because tliere liad been no intermediate lease granted, and nothing had been said about his being entitled to take off the outgoing crop, that plaintiff was not entitled to awything when he went out. The law, however, provided that where the custom of a county was that a person going out of a farm was to be entitled to the same terms as lie came in, although there might be a lease, he was entitled to claim tlie custom in respect to his outgoing crop — Mr. Lopes contended it was not the custom of the county for tenants to take away outgoing crops. — Mr. Cole stated that the defendant had paid into court £26 for the value of the wheat crop of 10 acres, which lie considered was sufficient to pay for the labour and tillage. In that respect he was wrong, as the cost of tillag", and 36 bushels of seed-wheat cost £29 63. 6d, If the law was against his client, he (Mr. Cole) must say it was a very hard law, as the plaintiff had paid for the wheat crop wlien he went on the farm, and he expected of course to be treated on the same terms when he went out. — His lordship remarked he could not see the law was very hard, as an agreement might easily have been made. — Mr. Cole then read some correspondence which had passed between the plaintiff and the defendant, in which tlio latter addressed the former as plain " Atkinson," and in his first letter said " that the lease must be our guide." Unless he gave up his " hollow claim" he (the defendant) should proceed against him, and his opposition would only lead him to expense. The defendant further stated tliat this was the last letter and the last " piece of advice plaintiff would receive from his landlord and well- wisher." Owing to Mr. Atkinson being ill, Mr. Symonds replied to this letter, stating that plaintiff would quit on the same terms as he entered. To this the defendant wrote another letter, saying for the last time lie cautioned Atkinson that there was a lease, which he should act upon, and if he did not give up possession of the farm he should eject him. In another letter defendant warned him " for the last time," stating that he wanted his rent paid and his farm given up. To this Mr. Giles Symonds replied that Mr. Atkinson would not be prepared to pay any rent whilst defendant disputed as to the outgrowing crop of wheat. If defendant wanted possession of the farm plaintiff was willing to leave the matter to a valuer. — The plaintiff, in the course of his evidence, said the custom with respect to a Lady-day tenancy was for the incoming tenant to take off the outgoing wheat crop. In cross-examination he said he knew such was the custom in Warwickshire and Surrey, and he knew how tenants came out in his own neighbourhood, although they held in various ways. He tilled ten acres of wheat and sowed seed for it. — Mr. Giles Symonds, auctioneer and valuer, said in most cases in this neighbourhood a tenant having a Lady-day tenancy was entitled to take off the outgrowing crop of wheat. — His lord- ship said before a person could swear as to custom he must know in what respect a farm was held. There were many difficulties in proving custom. He did not see there was any hardship in this case ; it was simply a question of law on botii sides. The planititf in tiiis case bought, when he went into the farm, the outgoing crop. He took the laud on lease, in which it was provided that he should be paid for his outgoing crop. Another lease was then granted him containing no such provisions, yet in the face of (ihis the plaintiff sowed his land when he had no outgoing crop, and the defendant in order to settle matters said he was willing to pay a certain sum, when in point of law he was not bound to do so. — On the recommendation of the learned judge, as the parties concerned could notjcometo terms, the plaintiff's counsel agreed to a nonsuit, which was accordingly entered. EAST ANGLIAN FARMERS' CENTRAL BOARD OF CONSULTATION. The members of the several Farmers' Defence Associations in the Eastern District met the Consultation Committee of the West Suffolk Association, by invitation, at the residence of its Vite-Chairman, Mr. 11. Stanley, of Bury St. Edmund's, to consider the constitution of a Central Board of Consultation for the discussion of questions of policy affecting such associa- tions, without prejudice to the independent action of each. The proposal for the formation of a Board of this kind had emanated from the Committee sitting at Bury St. Edmund's and had already gained the approval of all the associations consulted. The chair was taken by Mr. B. B. Hunter Rod- well, QC, Chairman of the West Suffolk Farmers' Defence Association, which was also represented by the Marquis of Bristol,?. Huddlestou, Esq., Mr. Henry Stanley, Mr. Walton Burre.U (Fornhara St. Martin), Mr. G. Gayford (Barrow), Mr. W. Harvey (Timwortii), Mr. W. Harvey (Wattisham), Mr. W. N. King (Great Barton), Mr. J. H. Turner (Horringer), and Mr. Salmon (Solicitor to the Association). The following were also present as representatives of other Defence Associa- tions : Mr. Martin Slater, of Cheveley, and Mr. George Robins, of Isleham, for the Newmarket Association; Mr. T. J. Gay- ford, of Hargham, for the Norfolk Association ; Mr. Chas. Mainprice and Mr. Wm. Mainprice, of Ely, for the Isle of Ely Association ; Mr. R. Attenborough, of Sawtry, and Mr. C. P. Tebbutt, of Huntingdon, for the Huntingdon Association ; Mr. J. S. Gardiner, of Borley Lodge, Sudbury, for the Essex and Suffolk Association ; Mr. Richardson, for the Colchester and East Essex Association ; Mr. John Burrell, of Littlebury, for the Saffron Walden Association ; Mr. W. Johnson, of Han- cheston, for the Wilford Hundred Association ; and Mr. J- Sherwood of Leiston, for the Saxmundham District. The aggregate assessment of the members of these Associations may be taken at an average of at least £50,000 each associa- tion. Tlie Chairman having opened the proceedings, the meeting proceeded to discuss the rules, which were unani- mously agreed to in the following form : 1. That this Board be called "The East Anglian Farmers' Central Board of Consultation," and be composed of repre- sentatives of the several Farmers' Defence Associations in Suffolk, Norfolk, Esses, Cambridgeshire, the Isle of Ely, and Huntingdonshire. 2. That the Board shall have power to admit representa- tives from other similar associations. 3. That the object of the Board shall be to discuss and advise on all questions affecting the interests of such associa- tions without prejudice to the independent action of each, but with a view to secure one uniform course of policy as far as practicable. i. That each association shall in the first instance be en- titled to send not more than two representatives to the Board, but that the Board shall have power to give additional re- presentatives to each district association if it shall be deemed expedient. 5. That in cases of emergency, or upon the requisition of any association, the chairman of the Board may call a special meeting of the Board at such time and place as he may appoint. 6. That the first general meeting of the Board should be held in the month of September next, at Bury St. Edmund's, the day to be fixed by the Chsirraan, and that the subse- quent annual meetings shall be held in the month of June, the day and place to be fixed by the Board at its previous meetings. 7. That the expenses of the Board shall be borne in equal proportions by its members. Mr. W. N. KiAG proposed the appointment of Mr. Hunter Rodwell as Chairman of the Board, and as the motion met with unanimous concurrence, Mr. Rodwell consented to take the office. Mr. Francis Ford was appointed secretary. THE FARMEli'S MAGAZlNS. 107 THE EDUCATION OF THE FARMEE. At the half-yearly general meeting of the members of the Cheshire Ciiaraber of Agriculture at Knutsford, tlie Hon. Wilbraham Egerton, M.P., presided over a very meagre atteudance. The Chairman said be vifished particularly to call attention lo the outbreak again of foot-and-mouth disease in tlie county. It was with great regret he did so, because he had hoped when that disease disappeared last autumn the county would have been clear of it for some years to come. They now found, however, that the disease was spreading throughout the county, and that the local authority, who previously liad some power to ercontrol the disease by the inspection of farms, were at present unable to do so, as the power was withdrawn by the Privy Council In reference to this matter it was feit^that Cheshire was exceptionally situated. It was close to one or two of the large seaports at which Irish cattle were constantly landed, and therefore such animals were exposed in the fairs of this county ; and the fact of the cattle having undergone a sea passage predisposed them to affection by foot-and-mouth disepse alter reaching land. It might be said it was impossible to stamp out the disease except by slaughtering, which would not be tolerated by agriculturists generally and the evidence before the Committee of the House of Commons confirmed that. But he must observe that there was a great ditference between stamping it out and limiting the centres of disease. The former probably the local authority could not do. He thouglit, however, it was quite possible if some power were conferred upon the local authority they could prevent tiie centres of disease being increased, inasmuch as they might prohibit the exposure of animals which had been recently in contact with the disease, or the removal of such cattle from one part of the country to another. The Orders in council were repealed last year on account of the report of the committee which sat upon the subject of contagious diseases, and the Privy Council were not likely to renew those orders unless there were some expression of opinion by agriculturists, now that the disease had broken out afresh. The committee who sat upou the question only contained 6 English county members — repre- senting Huntingdon, Norfolk, Leicester, Essex, Sussex, snd Northumberland — and in considering the evidence given by that committee it should be remembered that the two great dairy couQtie3,Chesliire and Somersetshire, were not represented on the committee. Besides, out of 47 witnesses examined there were only eight or nine who were English farmers, while the rest consisted of veterinary surgeons, scientific gentlemen connected with different counties or with the Privy Council, and a good number of those interested in the Irish cattle trade ; consequently, he thought it could hardly be said tliat the agricultural witnesses were so numerous as to influence the decision of the committee. There was not a single agricultural witness in favour of the repeal of the Orders in Council, and the only witness who spoke in favour of the removal of the restrictions was Mr. Verdon, a cattle salesman, of Liverpool. Under these circumstances, he thought it was desirable that the chamber should memorialise the Privy Council to give the local authority some power, and if that power were given it would be for the local authority to decide how it should be used. He did not wish other counties to be forced to carry out these regulations against their will. Therefore the orders should be perjiissive. Mr. Carter — Would it include this county only ? The Chairman said the regulations might be adopted in any county, but other countiesshould not be forced to adopt them against their will. Mr. Carter thought it would be useless unless the regula- tions were observed in Lancashire. Mr. G. Slater moved tliat a memorial be sent to the Privy Council according to the suggestion in the report. Mr. Yair having seconded the motion, Mr. DuTTON said that he did not rise to oppose it, but he thought that more depended upon the care exercised by farmers in the purchase of stock than upon any enactments of the law. Foot-and-moath was very different from pleuro-pneumouia, and he thought it was very desirable to check it, and strongly objected to anything like the system in operation last year. It was utterly impossible to prevent the movement of cattle unless they could in some way control the importation of cattle from Ireland. When a lot'of Irish stock was brought into the market there was a strong temptation to purchase ior a pound or tliirty shillings a head less if it could be done instead of paying a proper price and getting cattle free from disease. They purchased at, a low price, and that was the foundation of a large portion of the disease. Mr. G. Slater ; I suppose that if the disease broke out in Mr. Button's stock he would wish to have the liberty to sell those which he considered healtliy, say 49 out of 50 to different customers. Mr. Button : I said nothing of the kind. I deny it. What I said was this, that the Legislature had no right to prohibit me from selling a portion of my stock. Mr. G. Slater: Exactly ; that is what I mean. Mr. Button : Why didn't you say it. Mr. Slater : I hope I shall not misrepresent you. I was trying to give the logical result of your argument. If a man is left at liberty to sell his stuck, there is many a scoundrel who would do it, and Mr. Button thinks be cause you cannot carry out the law in all its details that you should do nothing. Mr. Button : Not at all. Mr. Slater : Well, I understand you to say you would let things remain as tliey are. Mr. G. W. Lath.vm read a paper on "The Education of the Agriculturists." In commencing he said : The education of the agricultursit means, practically, the education of a large part of the people of England, and that a scattered population, distributed up and down the country, and seldom collected in one town. It means the education of those who, from weather, distance, and the necessities of the seasons, are least able to attend school regularly. It means the education of those who, from their parentage and their associations, have less perhaps than any other class, any influences to awaken tlieir imagina- tion, and rouse their intellect. It means the education of a class who have few opportuuities when the age is come at which they cease to go to school, to keep up their learning or go on with their knowledge. In many cases, alas, it means a struggle against indecency and immorality found in wretched homes ; against corrupt and evil communications of com- panions ; against bad influences and cold indift'erence of all who ought to warn or encourage. But more than this. The^ education of the agriculturist implies the early teaching of another class— of the future employer as well as tlie future em- ployed. It implies the education of the landlord as well as the farmer, of the farmer as well as the labourer, and of these three classes I believe, at present, the educatiou is imperfect. Can we doubt that if these classes had known more, had been trained better, had learnt some of the doctrines, if not of poli- lical economy, at all events of Christian charity, that wretched struggle we have seen lately in the East of England would have been more easily re-adjusted? Can we doubt that if there was a more general education those twin curses of English life, pauperism and crime, would sensibly diminish ? After giving some statistics to show that ignorance was the fruitful source of crime and pauperism, he proceeded to argue that it was the duty of Government to protect society against these evils, and to do so by enforcing education. He went on to say that this obligation the Legislature had at all events partially acknow- ledged, and speaking of the Education Act, he expressed his regret that the present authorities of the Council of Education should have thought it necessary or expedient to alter the standard of educatiou which the children of pauper parents were obliged to reach before they could be exempted from at- tendance at school. But by a I'urther Act of last session a more general measure for indirect compulsion in the case of children emploved in agriculture became law. No child be- tween eight and twelve can be employed in any agricultural labour— exception being made for hay harvest, corn haiyest, and hop picking, or in cases where the justices of the division may for a period of not more than eight weeks suspend the Act— unless, being under ten, he has made 250 school at- tendances, or being above ten he has made 150 school at- tendances, daring the preceding year, or can produce a certi- ficate showing that he has passed a certain standard of education ; and the employer is liable to a penalty 108 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. of £5 if lie wilfully employs a. cl\ild without such a certificate either of attendance or of proficiency. The standard is miserably low, and indeed the Com- mittee of Council have been obliged to lower it, from the discovery tliat it was impossible to expect more. But, at all events, it is obligatory tiiat every child employed in agri- cultural labour should have liad an opportunity of learniug something. Take our own class, take a child reared up in au intelligent home, sent early to school, kept there from 12 to 18, spending its holidays among educated people ; and how often does that education turn out to be a sham and a delusion ? I remember a young squire in Cheshire, owuer of a good many thousands a-year, being reproached with some mistakes in spelling after he had been at Eton for a term, turning round and saying, " Well, at all events I am better than my uncles, for they can neither read nor write ;" aud if with all advan- tages this is sometimes the case, what must be the case when education at school ends probably at 12 and certainly at 14 ? Is there no way in which we can contrive to enable that educa- tion to be continued ? It is a question ratlier for the practical agriculturist than for myself to consider ; but I cannot but believe that there are times and seasons when a boy might be spared from farm work, and as a condition of his engagement be sent to school during some part of the day. I believe, too, that a system which our late President, the Lord Lieutenant of the County, tried at Tatton, of having oue set of boys one week aud another for another, miglit, witli certain modifications to suit the tenant-farmers, work successfully. I confess that I do not see how in purely agricultural and scattered populations the night-school can work, wiieu the pupil tired witli labour, and by an extra walk to the school, can hardly be expected to have his mind very fresh or his faculties very clear. He advocated lending libraries, because, he said, agricultural labourers as a class seem not to know what to do with their spare time in the winter evenings, and it is fortunate if the hero-worship of some older farm-servant, the desire to be thought bold men before they have ceased to be weak children, and the love of adventure, do not lead them into the public- house and even into crime. On this point, then, I will sum up my opinions by saying that the Legislature has done something — not, perhaps, all it should, but all it dares. The gap it has left is for you, as employer, to fill up. By your example and by your advice try to persuade the agricultural labourer to carry on the education he has begun at school. Oue of our present statesmen told us, ," We must educate our masters." I tell you that by educating our servants alone can we hope to remain masters, for else the world, the flesh, and the devil will be masters, and the labourer will serve them and neglect us. After drawing a verv flattering picture of the state of education in Scotland, wiiere the shepherd on tiie hillside is to be found reading his Greek Testament, Mr. Latham continued : But if I am sometimes inclined to despair of any great advance in the education of the agricultural labourer, until, as in Scotland, the nation is as a rule educated, and parents have begun to recog- nise the necessity of making sacrifices of present comfort and additional wages earned by their children, in order to secure to them the advantages of education, the icase is far different when I come to the second branch of my subject — the education of agricultural employers. I believe that in this case we have first the desire for education, and secondly the means of supply- ing it, and all that is wanted is organisation, and the applica- tion of means to au end. No one who knows the tenant- farmer of Clieshire can doubt that of late years he has improved in many ways. I do not speak of my present hearers They are, doubtless, the aristocracy of intellect among their brotherhood, they desire to learn, and are in most cases capable of teaching, or else they would not be members of this Chamber ; but I speak of the general class of farmers, large and small, scattered up and down the several divisions of this county. Perhaps, in many cases, they are both timid and obstinate. Afraid of introducing new-fangled improvements, wedded to a fault to their old- fashioned ways, disposed somewhat to hesitation in an expendi- ture of capital, too much in awe of the landlord or the agents, and sometimes, spite of all their caution and cunning, apt to be taken in by the humbug of a clever rascal. lu some classes, doubtless, they aie far from intellectual or refiued ; the tempta- tions of a rent-day or a market-day are too much for their hobriety. But, on the whole, I believe that as a class they are sensibly improved and improving. Yet who can doubt that if they had the opportunities of a thorough education, the bene- fits they would receive thereby must lift them up even more rapidly. And if the employe is to be educated, in the same proportion at least so should be the employed. Now, up to this time what has been the usual education of the future employer of labour? He has been sent to the national school, aud stayed there probably a year or two years longer than tlie sons of his father's labourers. If he has lived near a town, he has been sent to some private or old-fashioned grammar-school. In the holidays he has done some work ou the farm, and fre- quently if there was a horse to drive or an odd job to do he has been kept at home, sometimes even, iu a busy time of the year, saving the quarter's fees and the employment of an extra hand, by staying away from school altogether. His education has as a rule been desultory, superficial, and unsystematic. He has been taught no one thing specially useful to him as a farmer, and been so imperfectly grounded as to have small power of acquiring future knowledge. He has picked up some reading, some power of writing, some arithmetic, but has had little encouragement at home to advance his studies, and every temptation that a boy can have to be idle and amuse himself when the few hours of school are over. He is regarded as a hero by the labourers, flattered into self-conceit by his father's workmen, has no accurate knowledge of any one subject, no intellectual training by which he cau pursue any definite study. Is nut the wonder greater that so many turn out well, spite of all these disadvantages, than that a proportion go to the bad under the system ? Of course a boy educated in this way gets a sort of technical training. He knows by observation what is a fair day's work, what a pig or a calf ought to weigh. He can learn by experience the results of feeding and cropping, aud may fight iiis way up to being a good and money-making farmer. But is this all we want of our great rural middle class ? Is this enough — I was going to say for the safety of society, but I will put it even lower — for man's great st hap- piness ? Some knowledge of chemistry, of botany, of geology, would be useful to him in his profession, as well as increase his every-day's pleasures, whilst power to read, to appreciate the history of the past, to compare it with the possibilities of the future, would make him a better citizen, more fit to exer- cise influence himself, less subject to the undue influence of passion, prejudice, or fear, that are occasionally exercised upon him. How, without casting a burden upon the parents greater than cau be borne, are we to conceive that the opportunities of a thoroughly good education can be offered to every farmer's son ? Doubtless there will be cases where such opportunities will not be accepted, or, if accepted, appre- ciated, but the first thing is to fiud how they can be offered. Now, in the first place, I say that I distrust all education when it is carried on at home, and that home an average farm-house. I believe that a boy requires far more than the few hours' intellectual teaching that he gets by going to school, when he is resident at home, and that home is not one where, by the tuition of parents or relatives, his training can be carried on so as to supplemei t the school teaching. A boy wants the constant training of the playground as well as of the school. He wants to be taught temper and forbear- ance. He wants to find his level among his fellow-boys, who some day will be his fellow-men. He ought to be rid of the temptation to put by his book from school-time to school-time, to be rid of the flattery ana subservience «f his father's ser- vants. His intellect will be freer iu an atmosphere which all day is full of learning, and when he finds these associated with him at school are also his companions in play. I say therefore that the education to be preferred for a farmer's son is oue which is carried on away from home with the usual interval of rest for master and pupil. 1 say, too, that to ob- tain this it is worth any father's whiie to make sacrifices greater than any which I believe to be necessary for this ob- ject. I do not ask (or the sacrifices that a Scotch crofter or a small Welsh farmer will make to give his sons a college education — an education which frojn age answers somewhat to that of our grammer scliools. I ask only that from the age of 13 to 16 the mothers should be contented to see their sons at rare intervals, and that a sum something bsyond the cost of the boy's maintenance at home shall be bestowed on his better education at a middle-class school. Mr. Latham then went on to say that, as a starting-point for our middle- class school, he could not help looking at the old foundations of grammar-schools which existed in Cheshire. Primary edu- cation was cared for out of the public purse. They had therefore the whole aniouut of these old endowments available THE FARMER'S MAGAZINi]. 109 either for nndJle-class educatiou directly or iudireclly by a system of exhibitions from our niitioiial schools to the middle- class schools for boys who had shown talent and power of rising. If they could avail themselves in some measure of these old foundations, if tliey could utilise the buildings and masters, a payment of £33 or £35 per annu:n per head would provide food and teaching for schools of 100 boys each. If they could not do this, then as in Suffolk, in Surrey, and Devonshire, they might make an effort — build plain and simple buildings for their own use, raise the money by shares taken either by landlords or by the larger tenant-farmers, manage the establishment by a council of the wisest and most discreet among tliera, sure that the improvement of the rising genera- tion would recompense them a hundredfold for the outlay. He gave an illustration of a school in the county which had aimed too high, and to show that what the sons of Cheshire farmers and Cheshire tradesmen wanted was an education to suit them for the now more difficult battle of life, he quoted a passage from the report oi Mr. Wright on the Endowed Grammer Schools of Cheshire, which, he said, proves two things — first, that there are middle-class schools in this county, but not enoQgh for the population if they are to be used simply as day-schools ; secondly, that though these schools exist, they are not used to their full extent. I would propose to do away with the first evil by making one, two, tliree, or four of them into boarding-schools, as we might find the numbers required ; and the second e»il by shaping the instruction to the wants of the pupils, and thereby making the schools useful and poi)ular. As far as I can see, there are endowments foi schools in agricultur:il districts, excluding Macclesfield and Stockport, of some £1,500 per annum. In some places, as I liave told you, there is accommodation ready, and I believe it would be well worth the effort before we embarked on any scheme of building a central school to see if, with the help of the Endowed Schools Commissioners, and with the goodwill of the trustees of these schools, we could not shape out some satisfactory plan. I caa conceive no object more worthy of the attention of a Chamber of Agriculture than to promote the education of agriculturists ; and I trust that before we part this day the Chamber will appoint a committee, or re- quest its council to consider the whole subject, with powers to consult the Endowed School Commissioners if they think it desirable. I have hitherto said nothing about technical educatiou ; not that I undervalue it, as any who know me can testify, but because I think that in the educatiou of our labourers employeis the first step is to get a good general education, and to leave the techuical education to follow in cases where it is necessary. Doubtless the best techuical edu- cation for the farm labourer is to be found in work on the farm, and the discipline of hand and eye that follows practice in agricultural work. Doubtless, too, for their fuuire em- ployers a year or two at Cirencester College, or on some farm other than his father's, is a great advaiitage ; and the early teaching of botany and the rudiments of chemistry may be given at our proposed middle-class school. 13ut in the third branch of the subject — the education of the landowner — I shall speak only of technical education, 'fhe education of the sons of our large landowners is to be found in half-a-dozen famous schools — Oxford, Cambridge, the army and navy, and certain posts in the public service — supposed to be fit for gentlemen. These are the schools, all or any of which give a training, a stamp, a cast of ideas, which make a sort of asso- ciation of those who share them, and the association is the upper class. This cast of ideas has both its good and its bad side ; but I think that one may say, as a result of the teaching as a whole, that the class is characterised by a high spirit, by dignity, and by governing qualities. On the other hand it is wanting in an indisposition and incapacity for systematic knowledge and scientific learning. But be the educatiou what it may, I believe that much technic il and special learn- ing is necessary before a man can become a good landlord. lie may be a good-natured landlord ; he may be an improving landlord, but unless he understands something of the science of agriculture — what laud should do and what a tenant ought to do — he can never be a good landlord. He may, at con- siderable expense to himself, learn, by the experience of a home-farm, something of the difficulties of agriculture ; or he may by study at Cirencester or elsewhere, arrive at some idea of practice and science ; or, as our great landowners wisely do, he may abrogate his functions and entrust his duties to a part-professional adviser, called an agent. Speaking merely of the education of a landowner in his relation to his tenants ard to the land he holds, I bslieve that he is the wisest man who has the least confidence in himself, who trusts mainly to professional advice, and who joins a knowledge of human nature and a power of finding out a man whom he can trust, with a thorough disbelief in his own power — unless he has received a professional training for the purpose — to manage his own estates. But a landowner has, to my mind, another training which is requisite to enable him to perform the ordinary duties of his calling, to go through. A landlord, be he large or be he small, is likely to have more time to spare than an occupier of land ; and from that circumstance, as well as from his social position, will frequently be called upon to fill a position to which his neighbours have elected him, and to take part in the local government of the country. Is it possible that he can do this without some knowledge of the truths of political economy, without some acquaintance with social science, without some ideas of natural science, and without in many cases, some training to interpret an Act of Parliament ? Now, great and good as I consider the training of our schools and colleges to be, much as I value the army and navy as schools lor practical knowledge of men and manners — and in this county we ought never to forget that to the training of the army we owe the many re- forms which, aided by his strong practical common sense and active mind, our late chairman of quarter sessions was able to carry out — I think that just in these points does their teaching fail utterly. I confess that week alter week, meeting after meeting, am I shocked to find that educated men, for whose opinion on many things I have the highest respect, can ignore the first principle of political economy, can ruthlessly ride over the easiest teaching of social science. They are led away by their compassion, by some idea of economy, some fear of infringing the liberty of the subject, and in consequence what they intend by compassion is really cruelty, their pro- fessed economy ultimate extravagance, their so-called liberty of the subject slavery to the worst prejudices and habits of mankind. The blind lead the blind, and those who should be in advance of others, able to combat with the prejudices of those less educated than themselves, are really on these topics as little educated as those who follow and look up to tliera. But how can we hope to remedy this, to me, the greatest evil of our faults is education ? It is not so much a want of education as of special training in certain matters. !Much may, and I trust will be done by the future responsi- bilities which enlarged local government will throw on in- dividuals. Men will educate themselves for the occasion. Much could be done if our universities would make such sub- jects a special object in their training. But I feel that, after all, as long as property alone gives position and influence, as long as riches are able to overpower all other aristocracy, we must be at the mercy of those who can educate themselves, or not, as they choose, and must trust to the good sense of our rulers and to the influence of public opinion to prevent their meddling in matters of which they are positively ignorant. la this case, alas ! where it is most needed we can have no com- pulsory education. I have spoken so far, of what can be done for the education of the agriculturist — to the employed, employer, or landowner, by voluntary elfort. But before I conclude I should be cowardly to conceal from you my opinion that such efforts, unsystematic and ill-regulated as they must necessarily be, can never cover the whole ground of secondary education. Of primary education I need no longer speak, for I think that the ground will by and by, 'when the country is better prepared for it, be fairly covered by a national system. It strikes me that in our middle-class and upper class educa- tion, we have an easy-goiug absence of system, a powerlessuess and indifference of the state, a fatal independence in single in- st itutions, a free course for abuse, a waste of power, and a poverty of result, which is mainly owing to our disregarding the laws which rule modern society. In France, Germany, Italy, and Switzerland, education exists by having the commune and the municipal government as its foundation, and could not exist without them. Here in our country districts we liave ut present only the ecclesiastical organisation of the middle ages. The real preliminary to an effective system of educa- tion is to provide the counties with effective local government, to allow the means of education therein, to be utilized for a common object, to do away with all parochialism, and to throw revenues together under a system which will at once both benefit individual parishes and promote the good of the no THE FARMER'S MAGAZINli county. If we could in each county ptovide a local org-aaiza- tion which, trusted as it would be with the home rule of that county, would among its other duties direct the education ; if those chosen to rule the country were, as I take it they would be, those who possessed the confldeuce of their constituents, we should see the endowments, at present hardly utilised, if not, indeed, wasted, turned to some good purpose. We should have a system by which the boy might rise from the National school to the County-school, from the County school to a Central school, from the Central school to the University. We should have an assurance that talent and industry would meet with their rewards. Our education would cease to be a quackery, but become real and efficient, and the education of the agriculturist would be assured, as the best that could be given to him under the ever-varying circumstances — as must happen in each county — of the position he is to occupy in his after life. The CHiiRMAN said he was sure he was only giving ex- pression to the feeling of the Chamber when he said that their thanks were due to BIr. George Latham for his very able paper. The paper was really more comprehensive than the heading of it — The Education of Agriculturists — would have led them to expect. It was really an essay on the pre- sent state of education in this country as it affected all classes, and there were few classes which were not in some way or other connected with land interests. The paper touched upon the education of the labourer, the farmer and the laadowner, and many of the suggestions which had been made were well worthy of their consideration ; but still, what they had more especially to look to in that Chamber, was the education of the middle classes, and that was the point to which Mr. Latham attached the most importance. He had justly said that the education of the labourer was to a certain exteut provided for by the Elementary Education Act, nor did he ex- pect that the Chamber woull attempt to interlere with the education of those in our great public schools, who would compose the land-holding class. Public opinion had already done much to improve the education of the higher classes of this country, and no doubt would do more, and he (the chair- man) did not think that any recommendation which they might make would be likely to have any effect in inducing people to qualify themselves in a better manner than they did at present for the position of the landowner ; but he agreed with Mr. Latham that the Chamber might do something to further the education of the middle class or farming class of this county. It seemed to him (the chairman) that this county stood in a position different from that of other counties, for many of the farmers were very little above the agricultural labourers. Many of them went to school until they reached the age of thirteen or fourteen and obtained some education, but went to work on the farm, and so long as that was the case — as it not be expected that they could would spend three or four more years at school in order to get a technical or scien- tific knowledge of agriculture — so long there would be no amendment in their education. Much might he done, how- ever, by having agricultural schools, at which some special training could be given to the sons of farmers up to the ages of thi;teen or fourteen. To show them that agriculturists were not altogether unmindful of the question of technical education in regard to agriculture, he stated what had been done by the Royal Agricultural Society as shown in their re- port. This *as the framing of a scheme by the head masters of certain schools for the systematic study of agricultural chemistry, applied mechanics, &c., and competitive examina- tion!! in the same, the most successful students being rewarded by scholarships. He was sorry to find that there was no school in this county at which the scholars could study and compete with those of other schools, and he hoped before long there would be such. Sir Harry Mainwaring did not quite agree with Mr. Latham. He (Sir Harry) thought the education of the eyes was worth a great deal more than the education of the head. Therefore he would suggest uow what he suggested thirty years ago, that every farmer should send his son into another county at the age of thirteen, and when he came back in two years' time he would turn out better than if he had been to a school where they taught German, geology, the pianoforte, and all the rest of the accomplishments. He did not like that, and he hoped there would never be such schools for far- mers' sons. Send a boy into Sussex, where he would see very fferent things to what he saw here. Mr. Carter endorsed what Mr. Latham had said, and it was then decided to adjourn the discussion till the next general meeting. THE RABBIT AS AN ELECTIONEERING AGENT. — Mr. Justice Mellor reports that it was proved that at Launceston Colonel James Heury Deakin was guilty of a corrupt practice within the true intent and meaning of the Corrupt Practices Prevention Act, 1854 : " I was perfectly satisfied by the evidence that Mr. Deakin had endeavoured to remove all serious cause of complaint on the part of his tenants, in respect to damages by rabbits by employing trappers, and by urging upon his bailiff and gamekeeper his great desire that the rabbits should be kept down ; and it appeared from a correspondence between Mr. Cowlard, his solicitor and agent, and himself, that in the month of De- cember previous to the election he was informed that the rent audit was just over, and that the only discordant element was ' the rabbit damage,' and Mr. Cowlard proposed to Mr. Deakin that, with reference to certain of the tenants who had strongly urged their complaints, for the future the money arising from the sale of the rabbits should be divided into three parts, and, assuming the price of a rabbit to be 9d., tiiat one-third should be assigned to the trapper, another third to the keepers, and the remaining third divided between the tenants who might have sustained damage. Mr. Deakin at once agreed to the suggestion, and I am satisfied that he did not desire or intend to keep any part of the proceeds of the sale of the rabbits for his own use, although he did in- tend to keep the control of the fund in his own power. I think that he was not aware of the extent of the excitement; from the rabbit question until his arrival on the 28th of January, and that his resolution to make the promise which he did make on the 29th with regard to the killing and ap- propriation of the rabbits by the tenants was made on the spur of the moment without reflection, and without consider- ing that what might have been a very reasonable and even laudable proceeding on his part at another time, when dis- connected with the election, was an illegal proceeding during a contest for the representation of the borough, at which he was a candidate. Unfortunately, the report of his speech on the 29th of January was printed and circulated the next day by his agents, and his proposal and promise was commented on and approved by his solicitor and agent at the meeting held on the 30th of January, after the nomination and before the poll. Still, I think that neither he nor his agents were at all aware of the extent and effect of the provisions of the Corrupt Practices Prevention Act. This may be accounted for by the fact, stated to me at the hearing, that only one con- test has taken place for the borough of Launceston during the last two hundred years, and that such contest occurred at the time of the passing of the first Reform Act, and I think that, Inasmuch as the representation of Launceston had always followed the ownership of the estate which Mr. Deakin had purchased in the year 1872, he and his agents were entirely taken by surprise at there being a serious contest at the last election. In the result, although I am quite satisfied that the facts of the case properly avoided the election, I regret the serious disqualifications which flow personally to Mr. Deakin from my decision, and which, as I think, should be reserved for the baser forms of bribery." — [Of course the question which at once arises here is why should the trapper or keeper claim any share in the money for which the rabbits are soldP They might almost as reasonably claim a share in the sheep or any other stock kept on the farm. — Editor.] THE ROYAL AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE, CIREN- CESTER.—Diploma awarded to (full marks 1,800) Monck- ton, John Henry, Breewood, Staffordshire — 1,418. Brewitt, George William, Old Gauldaloupe, Melton Mowbray, Leices- tershire— 1,415. Way, Henry, Dodpitts, Yarmouth, Isle of Wight— 1,375. Drewry, Frank Holker, Cark-in-Carkmel, Lancashire — 1,341. Rouse, Martin Luther, Balham House, Balham, London, S.W.— 1,200. Holland Medal.— John Henry Monckton. Scholarsliips. — First scholarship to Bre- witt, Wilson, Moconchy. Second scholarship to Burn Mur- doch, Ward, Mahony. THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. Ill THE SOIL— ITS ORIGIN AND GEOLOGICAL RELATIONS. A Lecture by Mr. Jamieson, the f ordyce lecturer on Agriculture at Marischal College, Aberdeen. Seeing that the mineral matter of the soil has been derived from the rocks and strata of which the crust of the earth is composed, we may expect to find that the character of the soil will vary with the geological nature of the rock on which it rests, and will depend a good deal upon it, and that if we had a geological map before us we could trace out the boundaries of different classes of soil by the colours which indicate the distribution of the various kinds of rock. In this expectation, however, we should find ourselves often much deceived. It would doubtless be the case that a close connection would be observed between the nature of the soil and the strata beneath it if the soil had resulted from direct decomposition of the sub- jacent rock. But this is seldom the case, for it is not often that we find the substance of the rock to have gradually moul- dered down into a soil, and to have remained undisturbed in the same spot. The wasted matter is generally carried off to some distance — often to a very great distance — from the locality that furnished it. The various agencies I have already alluded to — the rivers, and glaciers, and ocean currents — bear off the material and carry it far away, so that we frequently find the mineral matter of the soil bears no relation whatever to the actual rock on which it reposes. Take, for example, the soil of Egypt. The fine alluvial loam of that country has been brought down hundreds of miles from the far interior of Africa by the river Nile, and has nothingto do with the rock which immediately underlies it. Its source is far away among the mountains, beside the great lakes at the head of the river. And in our own country we find that the boulders and pebbles of the soil of any particular field have often come from remote localities, and that even the mass of earthy matter in which they are embedded may also have been transported from a dis- tance. The glaciers in htis [instance have probably been the means of transport, or floating ice, when the country was under water. The geological map, therefore, requires to be used with discrimination, and it becomes necessary to bear in mind the way in which Nature goes to work on these matters. The maps show the distribution of tlie various classes of rock, but we have none as yet that show the distribution of different soils ; and the barren or fertile nature of a farm cannot often be inferred from the nature of the rock that lies below it. The character of the soil depends more upon the loose, superficial, earthy matter that covers the rock than upon the solid strata themselves, and these superficial deposits have not been suf- ficiently studied as yet to enable us to map them with any degree of accuracy. It is true they have been derived origi- nally from the rocks, but they have been carried in various directions, and drifted hither and thither, so that in many cases they do not lie upon the rocks from which they have proceeded. This is one reason why we cannot get the information from a geological map in regard to the soils of a country that we might have at first expected. Although, therefore, we cannot draw any nice distinctions, nor tell whether a farm will be a good one or not, merely because it lies on this or that kind of rock, yet taking a broader view of the matter, we can perceive some connection between the two sets of facts, and, without asking you to follow me into a long disquisition on the various geological formations (which I think would be out of place here), I shall touch briefly on a few points that seem to me to be worthy of notice, and, in doing so, I shall confine myself to the rocks and soils of our own country. The greater part of the North of Scotland, what we are accustomed to term the Highlands, consists of the older crystalline rocks, the gneiss, mica-slate, quartz-rock, clay slate, and granite. These rocks are generally of a hard solid nature, and do not yield readily to the weather, and when they do moulder down, they give rise to soils which are commonly not very difficult to work, and are well adapted for the cultiva- tion of oats and turnips, being of a light, free, or friable texture, unlike the heavy clays of England, some of which can scarcely he ploughed by a pair of horse«. These rocks of our Scottish Highlands have been the source from whence a great part of the superficial deposits have been derived that overspread the lower grounds of the snrrouiiding districts, the glaciers and rivers having both flowed downwards from the mountain chains and great watersheds of the Highlands. Now, the mineral nature of these rocks explains some cf the peculiarities of our Scottish soils, especially in the northern counties. There is a great deficiency of phosphates and of lime in all these rocks, and consequently we find that our Scottish soils, as a rule, are very much wanting in these ingredients. No doubt there are some beds of limestone here and there among our Highland mountains, but they are too local and of too limited extent to affect the general character of the district ; and consequently we find our Scottish rivers contain far less lime than those of England. This gives the water a softer character, and makes it more suitable for washing with. The analyses of our Scottish soils, also, as a rule, exhibit a much smaller per-centage of lime than those of England, and those of the North of Scotland are poorer in this ingredient than even the soils of the Midland and Southern Counties. The same remark applies to the phosphoric acid. In all the soils derived from these old rocks, the gneiss, granite, &c., there is a marked deficiency of phosphoric acid, and hence the great demand for bone-dust, superphosphate, and all those manures which contain this ingredient. It is this poverty in lime and phosphates that constitutes the weak point in the soils of the North of Scotland, and has helped to stamp them with that aspect of barrenness which only the industry of the inhabitants has been able to efface. It is this which makes Scotland so much a land of heather. Wherever you find a hill of limestone, there you have grass and verdure, and, in order to banish the heather effectually from a newly reclaimed soil, there is nothing better than a good dose of lime. Lime discourages the growth of heaths in general, and also fir-trees (Lindley). We see, therefore, that the heather-clad surface of our Scottish hills — this land of brown heath and shaggy wood — arises in some measure from the want of lime in the rocks. The poverty of lime in our Northern hills and soils is also a reason why Scot- land is so miich a land of oats. Of all our grain crops, the oat is the one that does with the least lime. Barley loves a calcareous soil, and so does wheat, but an extra dose of lime will in many cases spoil a field of growing oats if it be of a thin, light texture, and good crops may be grown on land in which there is very little of this element. Although the rocks of our Scottish High- lands are weak in lime and phosphoric acid, there is generally no lack of potash and magnesia, and this is so far favourable for the growth of the turnip crop, which draws largely upon the potash of the soil, as also dues the potato and the straw of the grain crops in general. Accordingly, it is found that potash manures have seldom mnch influence on the crops with us. Iron also is generally present, and often in so large quan- tities as to be injurious, forming a pan or hard stratum be- tween the soil and subsoil. The heather is a plant that takes in a good deal of iron, and this is another reason why the hills of Scotland are so favourable lor its growth. We see then that the granite and gneiss rocks ol Scotland give rise to soils which are characterised by a deficiency of lime and phosphoric acid, and by a richness in potash and iron, and 1 should also add of the element called silica, which, however, is one that few soils want. Owing to the great poverty in lime and phos- phoric acid, turnips can seldom be grown on such soils to ad- vantage until these two substances be added, and indeed in the case of newly-reclaimed ground, a dose of lime is almost always required before crops of any kind will thrive well. Another serious disadvantage in regard to the soils ot the Highlands and northern regions of Scotland, which I must not omit to notice, is the rugged, stony nature of the ground, more es- pecially in its natural unimproved state. Large boulders and great blocks of stone abound in most districts, and form troublesome impediments to the plough and to some of the improved class of implements. They will also be found an obstacle to the introduction of steam cultivation in many localities which are otherwise well adapted for it. This rngged and rocky aspect of the soil is a characteristic feature of the older crystalline and granitic rocks, not only in Scot- land, but in other countries where they occur, and is due in ^ 112 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. great measure to their hard, iudestructible nature, which yields slowly to the weather. The Old Hed Sandstone. — A considerable part of Scot- land is occupied by the old red sandstone formation, which we find stretching across the country from Stonehaven to the Firth of Clyde, in a broad belt along the south-eastern border of the Highlands. It also forms a large tract around the Moray firth, extending from the mouth of the River Spey along by Elgin, Nairn, Inverness, and Easter-Ross, and like- wise spreads over much of Caithncs and the Orkney Islands. This geological formation comprises an extensive series of beds. Part of it is composed of conglomerate or pudding- stone, which is a mass of coarse gravel and pebbles, ceme»ted together and consolidated into a hard, stony condition. Part of it is a sandstone more or less fine- grained, and often intermixed with beds of conglomerate. Other beds consist of flags ami shales, such as are split up for paving floors of kitchens and cellars. These are very much developed in Caitliness, and are well known in commerce as Caitliness pavement. There are also some beds of limestone, but generally of no great extent. Owing to this diversity of character, the old red formation gives rise to variety of soils, but generally speaking, it forms a much better agricultural subject than the gneiss and grauite, and some of the most fertile districts of Scotland are situated upon it. For example, the fine farms of Easter-Ross and of the Morayshire district, the How of the Mearus, and the best parts of Forfar and Perth, all lie on the old red sandstone. When the rough conglomarate comes to the surface, we have some barren tracts, and the flaggy beds of Caithness also form an inferior subject ; but with these exceptions the character of the formation is decidedly good. The sandstone beds moulder down into a free, loamy soil, which is easily culti- vated, and well adapted for most kinds of crops. The porous nature of the rock is favourable for drainage, and generally forms a dry, warm bottom. The outlines of the country are softer and less rugged than in the tracts of gneiss and mica- slate ; and unless where the boulders from the Highlands have been drifted over it, the surface is not much encumbered with heavy stones. Owing, however, to its proximity to these mountainous regions, the old red sandstone has in many cases been deeply covered with drifted matter full of large blocks of granite and other crystalline rocks. In the midland counties, the old red sandstone is much penetrated by veins and masses of volcanic rocks. Sometimes these assume the form of narrow dykes, cutting through it, but at otlier times they occupy large areas, and form considerable hills, as in tlie-Ochils and Sidlaw ranges. Geologists seem inclined to think that these intrusive masses have been due to old volcanic action, contemporaneous in some cases with the formation of the sandstone beds, and that they represent the lava, ashes, and other igneous products of the eruptions. However that may be, there is no doubt that they contribute in some degree to the fertility of the soils that have been derived from the rocks in which they oocur, for they impart a greater richness of mineral elements, and aff'ord not only a considerable^ amount of lime, but also traces of phosphoric acid. The Volcanic and Ig.\eous Rocks. — These volcanic and igneous rocks, I ought to mention, are not peculiar to one set of geological strata, but are met with more or less in all the formations, from the oldest to the most recent ; for, although we have uotliiug of tiie kind in our country in re- cent times, yet in many otiier regions rocks of this nature are still in course of production. In Scotland, as I have already mentioned, they occur very plentifully in the red sandstone district of the midland and southern counties. Almost a con- tinuous chain of hills, composed in a great measure of these igneous beds, stretches from the neighbourhood of Glasgow in a north-eastern direction across .Scotland to near Montrose, forming tiie Carapsie Hills, the Ocliils, and the Sidlaw range. They are also largely developed in the county of Fife and the Lothians, and throughout the Scottish coal field generally. Another district wliere they occur in large quantity is in the West Coast of Scotland. A large part of the Isle of Skye, the Isle of Mull, Staffa, and many of the other islets of the Hebrides consist of volcanic rocks. This western group is of later date than those I have mentioned as occurring in the old red sandstone, and belongs to the same period as the basaltic beds of the Giant's Causeway, or in the North of Ireland. However, I shall here class them alto- gether, as we have only to contemplate them from an agricul- tural point of view. In this aspect, they deserve attention, from the fertility of the soils to which they give rise. This fer- tility seems owing to the richness in mineral elements which characterises thera. This is a feature that may be remarked in many of the products of modern volcanoes. For example, the sheets of volcanic ashes that clothe the flanks of Vesuvius form a soil of extraordinary fertility in many places, afl'ording some of the finest vineyards in the world, and supporting good crops of wheat also. But the mineral character of the eruptions varies a great deal, and some are much less favourable to vege- tation than others. One lava stream may continue barren and destitute of plants for centuries, while another will soon clothe itself with luxuriant vegetation. And so it, no doubt, is with the lavas and igneous products of former ages ; some of them will give rise to more fertile soils than others. But looking at these rocks generally, we must pronounce them as a whole fa- vourable to vegetation. In the Isle of Skye, the hills ol vol- canic rock are in many cases covered witli a beautiful sweet grass, forming excellent sheep pasture ; although the ground is so rugged and rocky that little of it can be brought under the plough. The fertile character of the Lothians and much of Fife also appears to be due in no small degree to the numerous beds of \olcanic rock which occur among the strata of that quarter. The hill called Arthur's Seat, beside Edinburgh, is thought to have been the site of an old volcano in the times of the old red sandstone and coal beds. This theory was first pro- mulgated by the late Mr. M'Liren, formerly editor of the Scotsman, and an accomplished geologist, and -it is now the one adopted by the Geological Survey. But it is in the islands along the West Coast of Scotland that the grandest display of volcanic rocks is to be found. Many of the hills and elevated plains of the Hebrides, which form the picturesque scenery of that region, are, in fact, nothing else than the remains of old lava streams poured out from the volcanoes that raged furiously there during the tertiary period. Mr. Judd, who has been recently exploring the geology of that quarter, tells ns there were no less than five notable vents in the West Highlands from which the fiery matter issued, viz. : Mull, Skye, Rum, St. Kilda, and Ardnamurclian. Mr. Judd says that Skye and Mull were the sites of volcanoes of far greater magnitude than Etna, and the others were of dimensions not much inferior. These fiery mountains poured out their lavas at intervals during a vast length of time, and patches of old soils, trees, river gravels, and lake beds are entangled among the products of the erup- tions, showing that terrestrial conditions prevailed. Two kinds of lava are observable in these regions, distingislied by their ultimate chemical composition. Que the acid, the other the basic series. The acid series is of a filspathic, the basic of a basaltic nature. The filspathic lavas were erupted first, Judd thinks, probably during Eocene times, and the basaltic at a later date, during the Meocene period. The Coal JIeasures. — The nest great geological forma- tion which occupies an important area of our country is that which is generally known as the coal measures. These com- prise an extensive and highly diversified series of beds, com- posed of shales, sandstone, limestone, and seams of coal. Shale is a geological term applied to beds composed of indurated clay. Clay itself consists of mineral matter which has been reduced to a very fine powder, and has been accumulated at the bottom of still quiet water. In its original condition, it was just a fine soft mud or ooze, such as we often see at the bottom of a sheltered harbour. VVhen this mud is laid dry, it forms clay, more or less tenacious, according to the fineness and purity of the sediment which subsided. When this clay has been subjected to great pressure and consolidation, and also to a certain amount of chemical change, as has happened in the course of ages to all the older beds of this nature, in conse- quence of the great weight of the strata lying above them and and other causes, it assumes the character of shale ; and when shale is still more altered by similar agencies on a greater scale, it becomes still iiarder and of a more crystalline and rocky nature, and assumes the character of slate or flagstone, as we see in the more ancient series of rocks. All these varieties of strata — viz., clay, shale, and slate or flagstone — are merely different phases of the same material assuming a different complexion and appearance, according to the degree of consolidation in which it is met with. In tlie same way beds of sand and silty matter vary fn character owing to the same causes, and may present themselves as loose sand — sand- stone or grit — or as hard quartz rock and gneiss, and in general the more ancient the strata are, the harder and more consolii THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 113 dated is tlie state ia wliicli we find tliem. The coal measures, then, consist of a great series of beds, composed of shale or fire-clay — grit or sandstone— with much limestone and coal, often rich in iron ore. In Scotland and Britain generally the limestone beds lie beneath the coal, and are often associated and interstratified with sandstone and grit, the useful coal seams lying at the top of the series. In Scotland, these coal measures stretch across tlie narrowest part of the country from the shores of the Firth of torth on the east coast to the Firth of Clyde on the nest, occupying the greater part of Fife, the three Lothians, Lanark, A.yr, and Renfrew. In England, tliey commence at the northern extremity, and stretch through Nortlmmberland, Durham, Lancashire, and York, into the very centre of the Kingdom as far as Derby and Stafford, and also occupy a considerable tract in the South of Wales. In Ireland they extend over by much the larger part of the country, the great central area of that island being formed of the lower beds of the formations, the upper or true coal strata being chiefly developed in the south-western district, near the mouth of the Shannon and in the neighbourhood of Kilkenny, In these .coal measures the great limestead beds lie beneath the coal. This limestone, together with the associated beds of sandstone, is a marine deposit, and has been formed ciiielly by the growth of great beds of stone lilies, together with masses of coral and sea shells. Just a sort of great coral reef. All these grew and flourished at the bottom of the sea, absorbing lime from the water in wiiich it had previously been dissolved, and by their decay formed extensive reefs of calcareous matter, which now present themselves as beds of limestone. The coal, on tlie other hand, was formed at a later period, and has arisen from the decay of beds of vegetable matter, which grew in vast swamps and marshes, somewhat like our peat mosses, but on a far more extensive scale. The vegetation of that period consisted of plants allied to our ferns and mosses, but instead of being small and diminutive like tiiem, they grew to the dimensions of trees, and must have formed thick forests which, owing to a peculiar climate and state of the atmosphere, sprang up with marvellous rapidity and luxuriance. These wide-spreading jungles grew and fell, and were covered up by sheets of mud and sand thrown down by the river floods of that period. On these a second forest sprang up, decayed, and was buried in a similar manner, and so the process went on. And it is evident that tlie conditions ol the earth at that period were specially adapted for the purpose of making and preserving fuel for future ages, and thus we have it laid past for us in pits and cellars waiting the age of steam, which has now arrived, and tlireatens to consume these coal-beds far faster than they were originally made. Owing to the variety of character which the different members of the coal measures present, they give rise to soils which are equally diversified in their nature. The limestone forms the best soil, and the regions where it comes to the surface are often of a very fertile cliaracter. The great limestone plain of Ireland abounds in beautiful pastures, and, favoured as it is by a mild and moist climate, its grass and herbage are ever green, and therefore Erin has been called the Emerald Isle from the coastant ver- dure of its vegetation. Again, some of our best land in Scot- land is situated upon the limestone beds of the coal measures. T have only to mention Fife and the Lothians as evidence of this. In Scotland, however, the limestone and coal-beds generally are much invaded by masses of trap or volcanic rocks, and these, in many cases, no doubt help to give a character to the soils around them. This is very much the case in Fife, and also in East Lulhian. In England the volcanic rocks do not occur so often, and a great part of the carboniferous lime- stone and millstone grit forms elevated hilly ground at too great an altitude for wheat. Where it descpuds to lower levels, it of course proves a more favourable subject. It was a favourite saying of Thomas Bates that there was no place for rearing Shorthorns equal to the valley of the Wharfs. Now, tlie Wharfe takes its rise in the carboniferous limestone, and flows the greater part of its course through it and the millstone grit of the coal measures. Perhaps this may have something to do with the character that Bates has given this valley, for this limestone forms some of the best pastures in England. In the North Riding of Yorkshire (according to Mr. Milburn, of Thirsk, Roy. Ag. Soc. Jour, ix., 496) the grass land in the velleys and hill-sides of the carboniferous limestone lets for as much as £4 an acre. The millstone grit and shale, lying to the eastward of the limestone, form a more ungenial belt of land. And taking the whole of North Riding, he tells us that the character of the soil and the style of farming are very much regulated by the geological nature of the strata on which the soil reposes. Although the limestone, then, forms a good agricultural subject, we connot speak so favourably of the other members of the coal measures. The shales, fire-clays, ironstone beds, &c., have all an inferior character, and form soils which are often low in the scale of fertility. This arises partly from their frequent tenacity and wetness, and, probably, also in part from their impregnation with sulphur and metallic substances. The Glacial Beds. — In the northern parts of both Europe and America, and indeed over a large part of the polar and temperate regions of the globe, there is a very widely- spread mass of coarse earth or clay mixed with stones, which generally lies as a covering upon the more solid strata, and which, geologists are now of opinion, has been formed by the action of ice, at a time when a colder climate prevailed over most of the globe. This phase of the earth's history is generally known as the glacial period, and immediately preceded the occupation of the earth by the human race. During this glacial period an arctic climate reigned over the north of Europe, and a great part of the surface of our pre- sent continent was covered by snow and ice, much like what Greenland is at the present day, and it was owing to the action of the ice upon the rocky framework of the country that this mass of coarse earthy matter was produced, and spread over the surface of the rocks. It has been derived from the waste of the rocks by the ice, which, moving over them with great friction, ground them down to a state like mud, tiiis earthy mud being at the same tim^ mixed with stones and boulders carried along by the ice. In many parts of Scotland these boulders are thickly scattered over the surface, and form a great impedi"'ent to the improvement and proper cultivation of the soil, being frequently of great size, and requiring to be blown to pieces by gunpowder before tliey can be got rid of. Such is the case also in many parts of the North of Earope and in Canada and tiie U.S. of America. These large boulders are generally met with in great numbers along the sides of the llighlaud valleys, and over the low ground adjoin- ing the hills and mountain ranges, and have frequently been transported to immense distances from the rocks from which they were derived. In many parts of Scotland they have proved a source of much expense in the reclamation of the soil. The boulder clay, or coarse earth in which they are imbedded, varies a good deal in its character, according to the nature of the rocky strata from which it has been derived. It generally consists of a mixture of fine impalpable mud, mixed with coarse sand, petjbles, and stones of many kinds and sizes, form- ing a stiff, tenacious paste. In Aberdeenshire and most of the North of Scotland it has been derived from the waste of the Gram- pian hills, and its materials consist ofthe granite, gneiss, and other crystalline rocks ofthe Highlands and hilly grounds reduced to powder. When it rests upon a dry bottom, and is not much infested. with large boulders, it often forms a tolerably good subsoil ;' but, owing to its tenacity, it is frequently of a reten- tive nature, and requires drainage. It also abounds frequently in springs of water, and its agricultural value with us depends chiefly upon its dryness and freedom from large boulders, and also upon the circumstance of its being not too much impreg- nated with oxide of iron. In those districts, when tlie rock on which it reposes is of an open, porous nature, it forms a good warm subsoil; but, when the rock supporting it is of a close texture or full of springs, then the water, diffusing itself through ihe overlying mass of earth, renders it cold and wet. In Scotland this boulder clay is generally dBllcient in lime, and is often too much impregnated with oxide of iron, which occasionally forms a hard stratum or pan, very unfavourable to vegetation. In the districts of the old red sandstone the glacial beds partake of the character of that formation, and are of a redder, sandier, aud more porous nature— are generally less infested with heavy boulders, except in the neighbourliood of the Grampians, when the drift from the gneiss mountains has partially overspreal tiie sandstone strata. The Glacial Marine Clays.— Along the low grounds adjoining the coast, we find in many places beds of a very pure retentive clay, which consists of the fine muddy sediment deposited at the bottom ot the sea during part of the glacial period when much of the country was under water. These clays occur along the eastern parishes of Aberdeenshire, and here and there along all the low coast districts of Scotland, and over part of England and Ireland. They vary in colour 114 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. according to the hue of the rocks froin which the sediment has been derived. Along the Banffshire coast, and round by Fraserburgh to the neighbourhood of Peterhead, the clay is generally of an indigo or dark leaden blue colour. From Peterhead along the cast coast to Fife it is mostly red. These clays are used for making bricks and tiles. They form a very heavy and difficult soil to work. Turnips don't thrive upon them, except in unusually favourable seasons, and they are difficult to drain. Clover and vetches, beans and wheat, are the crops for which they are naturally adapted. In some quarters there are beds and seams of tine sand interstratifled with the clay, and these form a better subject for the agricul- turist, but the tracts of pure clay form some of the worst soils we have, and are more adapted for steam cultivation than liorse labour. The large boulders that occasionally occur in them are supposed to have been drifted by the agency of floating ice. There is a good deal of this clay in the parishes of St. Fergus, Peterhead, Crudeu, Slains, Logie-Buchan, and some parts ofEiloti, Foveran, and Belhelvie. We do not meet with it iu the interior of the county, and there is none of it in Deeside, Donside, and very little along the valley of the Ythan. Valley Gravel a>'d Moraines. — Along the banks of all the rivers we find a good deal of gravelly ground, the extent of which is generally in proportion to the size of the valleys. These beds of gravel have been formed at the close of the gla- cial period, when the snow and ice gradually melted, and their origin is to be sought in tlie heavy floods which took place every season when great thaws occurred, and gave rise to volumes of water flowing down the valleys much greater than anything we now see even in the rainiest seasons. They mark tiie time when the ice was disappearing gradually by reason of the return of a more genial climate. We find a great deal of tliis gravel along the side of the Dee, the Don, the Spey, the Findliorn, tlie Tay, and all our larger rivers ; and a proportion, ally less amount of it on tiie banks of the smaller streams. It forms a dry, warm subsoil, on whicli we have light porous soils that grow good crops in moist seasons, well adapted for here and barley, turnips and potatoes. In the Highlands valley we often find large mounds of course gravel and stoney rubbish, which are old moraines formed along the margin of the beds of ice that filled the valleys in the latter part of the glacial period, similar to what are to be seen among the Alps of Switzerland at the present day. The greater number of our towns and vil- lages are built on this valley gravel. Aberdeen, Banchory, Aboyne, Ballater, and Braemar, Kintore, Inverurie, Huntly, Ellon, &c. It forms a favourite site for mansions and country seats by reason of its dry healthy character ; Balmoral, Tay- joouth Castle, and most of the houses of the nobility are upon it. When the gravel is course and pebbly, it forms a poor, hungry soil, which in a dry summer grows almost nothing, but when the sand is finer, and covered by a good depth of loam, it forms one of the most valuable soils we have, easy to work, and adapted for almost every kind of crop. The Carse Lands. — Another geological deposit different in character from auy of those I have been describing is the carse ground. The Carse of Gowrie and the Carse of Falkirk are two well known tracts of very level land, which have been formed after the glacial period had passed away, and are com- posed of masses of old estuary mud formed along the Firths of Tay and Fortii at a time when the coast was depressed about 23 feet beneath its present level, so that the tides reached higher up the river valleys than they do now. The soil of the carse consists of a fine muddy sediment, quite free from stones, and very similar to the ooze which we find at the bottom of any of our sheltered harbours. Several skeletons of large whales have been got imbedded in the soil of the carse, and beds of cockles and oysters also attest the nature of the conditions under which it was accumulated. Although the Carses of Fal- kirk and Gowrie are the most extensive and well known of these deposits, yet ground of the same kind, although of less extent, occurs round the Montrose basin, at the mouth of the Clyde, at Beauly, Spynie, Tain, and otiier similarly situated places. There are also large tracts of the same nature in England, in the Fen districts, and along the mouths of most large rivers. These carse lands are often extremely fertile, and form some of the most valuable wheat-soil we have, but although this is often so, it is not always the case. Some of it is a poor tenacious clay, difiicult to work, and from its flat nature not easily drained. It is remarkably well adapted for steam culti- vation, owing to its uniform character and entire freedom from stones. It generally forms level plains of rich bluish mud, rising in a sort of low platform along the sides of the present estuaries. Alluvial Soils. — Along the banks of every large river we find some extent of alluvial soil, consisting of the fine sedi- ment thrown down from the water in time of floods, and which forms meadows and flats along the sides of the stream ; in Scotland they are generally called haucjhs. The extent of these alluvial soils depends of course upon the size and nature of the river. In Britain, where the rivers are small, they are of comparatively little extent, but in other countries they are of immense area. The fertile land of Egypt is nothing else than the meadow of the River Nile, and in the valleys of the Mississippi, the Amazon, and other large Continental streams this fluviatite sediment forms some of the most important and fertile tracts in the world. A large part of China consists of the alluvium of its great rivers. Although this class of soil is generally of a very fertile character, yet its value is often impaired by the difficulty that occurs in keeping the water off. It is often subject to be flooded, and lying generally little above the level of the rivers, a proper outfall cannot be got for drains. These meadows form excellent grass land, from the great depth and richness of the soil, which permits the roots of the plants to go deep down, so that they do not suffer in dry weather. The finest pastures in England are in some of these alluvial grounds, as, for example, in Somersetshire, where there is a flat of about 1,000 acres which lets annually for grazing at about £6 an acre all over. Peat Soils. — Another kind of soil or superficial covering which is still in course of formation is peat, which in some places occupies a large extent of surface, and furnishes fuel to much of our rural population. These beds of peat are of very variable depth, and occur not only in low swampy hollows where the drainage is obstructed, but also cover with a less degree of thickness the surface of many of our hills, even the very tops of some of them, up to heights exceeding 2,000 feet above the level of the sea. In the Highland districts peaty turf forms a very large proportion of the surface; while in Ireland, so great is the area it occupies, that the Commissioners appointed by Parliament to inquire into the subject, reported that the extent of peat soil in that county amounts to nearly three million acres, of which rather mors than half consists of flat red bog, and the remainder forms the covering of mountains. These Irish bogs are often of immense depth, 30 to 40 feet being not uncommon in some of them ; and, in ote 'instance, 4-7 feet was reached. In Scotland, their depth and dimensions are much less. One of the largest peat mosses is the Flanders Moss, in the district of the Forth, which covers about 10,000 acres. We have a good deal of it in Aberdeenshire, and in the Buchan district there are extensive peat mosses to the E. and W. of the Hill of Mormond, occupying much of the parishes of Crimond, Lonmay, St Fergus, Strichen, and New Deer, In St Fergus some of the peat is said to exceed 20 feet in depth, but it is not often that it reaches ten feet with us, so far as my observation goes. Peat is a substance formed in cold and humid climates by the gradual decay of those plants which flourish in moist and swampy places. In warm and tropical countries the decomposition of the dead plants goes on too rapidly and completely, so that peat is not formed. A moist, temperate, or coldish climate, and a wet soil, seem to be the conditions most favourable for its accumulation. In many peat mosses we find remains of trees, such as hazel, hirch, oak, alder, and fir, but in others we find none, and many of the most extensive bogs in Ireland contain no trees, the whole mass of peat from top to bottom being formed of mosses, sedge, and other aquatic plants, which have flourished and decayed season after season, each year's crop forming by its decomposition a film of vegetable matter. Towards the bottom of these deep Irish bogs, the fibres of the dead plants cease to be visible, the colour of the stuff, becomes blacker, and its texture more compact, forming a very valuable fuel, and having, when dry, some resemblance to pitch or bituminous coal. Peat itself forms a very poor soil, but when it is well drained, and mixed with a proportion of earthy matter, it is greatly improved, and will grow good crops of oats, turnips, and potatoes. \ THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE, 115 A NORTH COUNTRY VILLAGE. [Report by H. Franklyn Parsons, M.D., Medical Officer of Health, for the Goole and Selby Rural Sanitary Districts.] As the first instalment of ray sanitary work, I beg to present the following report on the sanitary condition of Luddington, based npon personal observations made there in company witli Mr. Tudor, on January 10th and 23rd. My reason for begin- ning with Luddington was that I was informed that it was in the worst sanitary condition of any township in the union, and indeed for the credit of the union I hope this is the case ; for in spite of what has been already done for its amelioration the state of Luddington is still filthy and unhealthy in the extreme. The village of Luddington consists almost entirely of a single long serpentine street, which formerly skirted the right or Lin- colnshire bank of the river Don. When, however, the " Dutcii river" was cut, about 250 years ago, tlie waters of the Don forsook their old course, which in consequence became silted up. At present the course of the old Don is for the most part marked only by a scarcely perceptible depression, but in some portions a ditch still remains, into wliich water finds its way, but can escape only by evaporation or soaking into the soil, and these portions form convenient receptacles for refuse of various kinds. Owing to the newness of the ground, the walls of several houses built on the margin of the old river bed have sank and cracked to a greater or less extent. The country around Luddington is treeless, and very flat, there being only a very slight fall to the east, where a watercourse, called the Mere Dyke, pursues its sluggish way towards the Trent. The geo- logic formation is alluvial, and consists of a sandy loam or " warp" with beds of sand or clay in places ; and at a depth of about thirty feet a hard bed of sandstone known as " pan-sand" is met with. The population of Luddington according to the last census was 775. In 1873 tlurtren deaths occurred there, including one each from typhoid and scarlet fevers. The po- pulation is entirely an agricultural one, and consists to a con- siderable extent of Irish ; wages appear to be low for this part of England ; and the scanty furniture, and ragged children in many houses bore witness to the poverty of the inmates. Over- crowding is said to prevail among the Irish in summer and harvest to a dangerous degree, and some instances came under our notice, although owing to the free ventilation afforded by the dilapidated houses, its evil effects were not always so ob- vious to the senses as might have been expected. In one case we found a man with his wife and nine children sleeping in a room only five feet three inches in height, and of only 955 cubic feet capacity ; each person would, therefore, have on an average less than eighty-seven cubic feet of space — 240 cubic feet being the minimum allowance fixed for each person in the regulations for metropolitan lodging-houses, while authors on hygiene insist on a much larger amount. The room had no ceiling, but only a sloping tilted roof, partly concealed by a few mats of flax- waste ; there was a large gaping crack in the wall at the end, and the floor was of " grouting," upon which the whole family slept without a bedstead. In several other houses we found no ceiling, the only covering being the tiles. Such houses are hot in summer and bitterly cold in winter. Many of the cottages are in a very ruinous state ; of one a large portion of the roof had been blown off : it was, nevertheless, occupied by a family. The walls and floors are generally constructed of an inferior kind of brick, which decays in the course of time ; from this cause, combined with the absence of drainage and neglect of necessary repairs, many of the cottages are very damp — a condition most injurious to health. There is no main drainage in Luddington. The houses on the west side of the road are mostly furnished with drains of common porous pipes, which run across the old Don into the adjoining field and terminate in blind extremities, their contents soaking into the soil. Some of the houses on the opposite side of the stieet hare drains which lead into stagnant foul ditches, a short distance from the houses, and the remainder have no drainage at all ; the liquid refuse from the houses being thrown into the ashpits, or anywhere handy. The evils re- sulting from this state of things are — 1, Dampness of ^the houses from the ground around being sodden with slops ; 2, Nuisances arising from the stagnation near the houses of runnings from pigstyes, and other foul liquids ; and 3, Pollu- tion of the wells by these liquids percolating through the soil. To remedy these evils a proper system of sewerage is urgently called for. The principal street would require to be sewered in two portions, one of tliera discharging into a sewer leading down Mere Dyke-lane, the other into one down Church-lane ; both should be covered for some distance be- yond the last houses. For the details, however, I will refer you to your able surveyor, Mr. Tudor. As it is important for the prevention of phthisis, rheumatism, and other diseases, that the subsoil on which dwellings are built should be dry, and as this drying cannot be effected by the impervious pipes which it is necessary to use when sewage has to be conveyed, I would recommend that a row of ordinary agricultural drain- pipes be laid alongside of or underneath the sewer-pipes ; the extra cost of this if done at the same time would be small, as no additional excavations would need to be made. A cheaper expedient would be to use unglazed socket-pipes, the lower half embedded in clay, so as to retain the sewage, and the upper part surrounded by porous materials to allow the passage of the subsoil water info the sewer. The farmyards should be drained into water-tight covered cesspools, with pumps for the liquid manure, for owing to the oft repeated removal of soil with manure from their surface, their level is too low for any other outfall to be obtained. Another great delect in many of the poorer houses is the absence of a staircase, access being gained to the bed-rooms up a ladder in the corner of the room, and through a hole in the floor above. In one case, where the height that had to be ascended in this way was as much as 10 feet, the tenant told me that slie and her children had frequently met with accidents from falls. Other houses are without adequate means of ventilation. On the whole, the state of the cottage property in Luddington is dis- graceful, and there are about eight houses wliich, in my opinion, ought to be closed as soon as practicable, unless the necessary alterations are made, which would probably cost nearly as much as rebuilding. The water of Luddington is one of the most unsatisfactory features of the place ; the quautity being deficient, and the wells almost invariably polluted. In- deed the inhabitants seem to have got to consider that the water of a well was never meant, and can never be fit, to be drunk by human beings, and that as it is therefore useless to protect the water from contamination, the most convenient place for the pump is in the fold-yard. For drinking and culinary purposes they always use rain-water, which those who have no facilities for catching it, are compelled to purchase at from O^d.to l^d.jOr even 2d. a bucketful. In dry seasons the supply of rain-water is very inadequate for the wants of the people, and the wells often run dry ; and when to this it is added that some of the people have to fetch water a quarter of a mile or more, it will be readily imagined that cleanliness must be a rare virtue among the poorer classes. As a proof of the scarcity of water I may mention that the rain-water butts were kept locked, and that the hard water pumps were almost always out of order, the buckets being leaky so that the pump ran dry, and had to be primed by pouring water down the top, it being preferred to let the pump remain in this condition, to prevent the neighbours taking the water. The raiuwater is collected either in barrels or cylindrical zinc cisterns, and in the better class of houses in underground tanks of masonry, or in cisterns of stone or lead. I consider stone or slate the best material for the pur- pose ; the use of leaden cisterns to hold rainwater used for drinking is fraught with much danger. 1 was informed of some cases of lead poisoning from this cause that occurred in Luddington some years ago. The rainwater is generally drunk nnfiltered, yet no care seems to be taken to ensure its purity ; before entering the butt it usually has to wash the lid, which in some instances I noticed to be covered with excre- ment of birds and animals. Still, I should prefer drinking even this, to the water of most o: the wells, which in colour, smell, and taste resembles — as in fact it is — a somewhat dilute infusion of farm and other manure. Chemical tests show it to be loaded with otganic impurities, and a foul scum rises to the surface on boiling. Nevertheless, there does not appear to be any absolute necessity for this disgusting state of affairs. No doubt there is but little water, and that of a poor quality, to be obtained from wells that do not penetrate below the "warp," but I am informed that on boring through the 116 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. stratum known as "pan sand," to which I have before alhideil, an abundant supply of good wafer may be obtaiaed at a depth of some 30 feet. In order to preserve this from pollution, the upper part of tiie well ranstba made water-tight, which may be done by clay puddle outside the brickwork, or better still by substituting for the latter large-sized glazed stoneware pipes. It is usual in this neighbourhood, instead of sinking a well until a sufficient supply of water is reached, to stop when a depth has been attained somewhat below the level to which it is thought that the water will rise, and to bore the remaining distance. If this be done, a Hag-stone should be placed at the bottom of the well for the brickwork or casing to rest on. This flag should have a hole in the centre through which an iron pipe should pass down the bore-bole as far as the nature of the ground may render it necessary, the upper end of tlie iron pipe being left projecting a foot or more above the stone bottom of the well. If this be done there will be no fear ot the bore-hole getting closed up, and the wall thus ceasing to yield. One or two good public wells in convenient situitious and furnished with pumps, would be an immense boon to the people of Luddington. I may mention that there is a well close to the Primitive Methodist Chapel, the water of which appears good, no source of pollution being present within some distance. Where rain-water is used lor drinking it should always be filtered, the roofs and pipes by which it is collected should be kept clean, the tank or butt covered, but ventilated, and in a cool shady place. The privies and pig- styes are often placed too near the houses : this is especially the case with those on the side of the street towards the old Don, the back premises to which are inconveniently small and cramped ; those on the other side have generally gardens. The privy arrangements are almost universally on the faulty plan. The excrement is allowed to accumulate until the privy is full, by which time it has become an offensive nuisance; it is then raked out and mixed up with ashes. Instead of this it would be far better to cover the excrement with ashes day by day. The deodorizing power of dry ashes is so great that nearly all smell would thus be prevented ; and for the greater convenience of emptying (which of course under these circunist:mces would require to be more frequently done), I recommend the adoption of box closets. These are in use to some extent in the town of Goole, and have been found to answer well. They are, no doubt, familiar to you, so that I need not stop to describe them, but I may remark that the box should be made watertight with pitch, and carried well under the front of the seat. One modification I would suggest in order to facilitate the removal of the box when full, viz., a pair of small wheels at the end of the box farthest from the door by which it is drawn, and sockets on either side at the nearer end, into which wooden handles might be thrust. The whole box might then be wheeled, wheel-barrow fashion, to any re- quired place, and its contents applied at once to the soil. It is in vain to expect any plan to succeed among the poor, how- ever great its sanitary advantages, if it entail more labour than that to which they have been accustomed. I do not propose that the adoption of this plan should be at once enforced in every case, but that when nuisances arise, as under the old arrangement they are nearly certain to do, and a notice for their abatement is necessary, the inspector be instructed to require the adaptation of the privy to the bos form. THE HIGHLAND AND AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND. The general meeting was held in the Society's Hall, Captain Tod, of Howden, senior director, in the absence of the president or any of the vice-presidents, in the chair. Christian Hoist, Chamberlain to his Majesty King Oscar II., and Norwegian Court Paymaster, and Ferdinand August Dahl, Director of the Royal Higher Agricultural School at Aas, Christiana, were elected honorary associates ; and 135 gentlemen were balloted for and admitted as ordinary members. Mr. G. AULDJO Jamieson, C.A., on behalf of Mr. Irvine, of Drum, read the following addition proposed to be made to the bye-laws ; " The Secretary shall, 30 days before the meet- ing of directors at which tlie list of ordinary and extraordinary directors lor the ensuing year is to be made up, intimate by advertisement in any two or more of tire Edinburgh newspapers that the directors are prepared to receive from members of the Society, within eight days from the date of such intima- tion, the names of such members as they may desire to suggest for the consideration ot the directors in making up the list to be recommended for the adoption of the Society at the general meeting in January." The Chairman said it must be borne in mind that this proposed alteration would not come into operation till next general meeting, as all alterations must be approved by two general meetings. Mr. "Walkek (Bowland), read the reply from her Ma- jesty's Office of Works to the memorial adopted at the general meeting of the Society on the 21st January upon an Ordnance Survey of Scotland. The memorial has already been pub- lished. It may be remembered that the First Commissioner stated that it seemed to him that the only mode of expediting the survey of Scotland was by increasing the annual Parlia- mentary grant for the service. Mr. Walker went on to say that he believed that a deputation which liad been appointed for the purpose had not yet iiad aconfrrfnce with the Govern- ment, but he hoped it would soon take place. He trusted they would impress on the Government the necessity of a larger outlay on this great work. It was clear that the ob- stacle in tiie way was financial ; and it was also clear to him that if they did not proceed more rapidly than hitherto, none of the present members of tlie Society would live to see it completed, and when it would be completed the earlier por- tions of it (vould be found to be out of date. He thought it was a disgrace that the Government of the country had not provided funds to complete this great national work within a reasonable time, The directors' proceedings in these matters were ap- proved of. Mr. Campbell Swijjton (Kimmergharae) stated that in February last the 15arone>s Durdett Coutts made some sug- gestions to the directors as to the Society exerting its influence for the promotion of the humane treatment of animals. Her ladyship's letter was referred to special committees, and these committees afterwards reported, when the directors agreed that to the medals in aid of prerainnis given by local societies there should, as already reported, be added a class for men in charge of stock, and one for women having charge of dairies and poultry. The directors had also under consideration the subject of aiding the cause of humane education, and circulars were sent out on the 31st Blarch to above 970 school boards in Scotland. It was gratifying to know that all the answers received stated that the subject had been favourably entertained by the school boards ; and he could personally state that that was the case in several school boards to which the circulars iuid been addressed. These boards looked upon this as a matter of great interest and importance. Mr. Murray (Dollerie) stated that he could say the same thing. The circular had been very favourably considered by the school boards with which he was connected. The report was approved of. Mr. GiLLOX (Wallhouse) reported that the entries for the show to be held at Inverness were: Cattle 380, horses 150, sheep 500, snine 55, poultry 500, coUie dogs 12, implements 1,000. Tlie following gentlemen, holders of the Society's diploma, Forbes Durn, Hardacres, Coldstream; Henry Erskine, Dal- ladies, Brechin ; Ilichard Henderson^ Coldstream, were also elected. Mr. Murray (Dollerie) moved the proposed alteration of the bye-laws, to enable the members to recommend gentlemen as directors, and providing tiiat the four vice-presidents and ten extraordinary directors shall retire annually, instead of one-half the number each of two successive years, and this was approved of. Previous to the reports on agricultural education being given in, Tiie Chairman said that he wished to make a few remarks. It was alw'ays best to tell the truth, and he confessed he was a little sorry to liave to say that the directors could not come to one mind regarding agricultural education and the chemical department. He therefore hoped that they would not be too THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 117 hurried in coming to any decision on the matter. The fact Wiis that the public generally thought that the Highland Society was rolling in wealth; and the true state of tlie case was that they had very little wealth. From a statement which they might hear by-and-by from the chairman of the Finance Committee, the.y iiad only £550 at their disposal as a surplus to spend in any way. That was all that there was to spend in promoting either agricultural education or in paying the expenses of tlie chemist. Now, agricultural education was 80 very much mixed up with the chemical department, that he wished to state these things before they entered upon tlie discussion of the subjects connected with the educational department, and to show that they must not be too hurried in coming to any decision regarding even what they as directors liad proposed. The meeting would hear in a short time tliat it was proposed to give bursaries to encourage agricultural educa- tion, but that was agreed to at a time before the directors had a clear understandinsj about their finances. They decided to give as much as i'SOO a year in bursaries, and it was very doubtful now wliether that could be carried out. He wished to make tliese remarks, so tliat in the discussion which would subsequently take place nothing, as he had said, should be iiurriedly done. It was quite a mistake for the public to think that the Highland Society was so wealthy. Their expenses had enormously increased within the last few years. A great deal was said about the small premiums and paltry medals whicii they provided. These were all now largely increased, and in- stead of having money at their disposal, they would have hard work to make ends meet at the end of this year. With these remarks, he called upon Professor Balfour for iiis report ou agricultural education. Professor Balfour reported that the annual examination of candidates for the diploma and certificate in agriculture granted by the Society took place on the 2'ith and 25di of March, when the following gentlemen passed : For diploma — Forbes Burn, Hardacres, Berwickshire, who obtained the cer- tificate in 1872, ; for certificate and diploma — Henry Erskine, Dalladies, Brechin, and Richard Henderson, Coldstream ; for certificate — William Kennedy, 89, Marine Parade, Brighton, who is, in terms of the bye-laws, entitled to present himself next year for the diploma. It was stated that the prizes given by tlie Society to the class of agriculture of the EJinburgii University had this year been awarded by Professor Wilson to John Bramwell, Blackaddie, Sanquhar, and Robert W. E. Murray, Housebyres, Galashiels. The papers of these two gentlemen being of equal merit, the amount, £10, was divided equally. Mr. Menzies then read the following report by the Coun- cil: The Council on Education having received the report of tlieir sub-committee, adopted it as follows : 1. That the Society should establish ten bursaries of £20 each, and ten of £10 each — at schools, to be approved of by the directors, wliich include or are willing to introduce the teaching of chemistry, and tlie following branches of natural science — physical geo- graphy, botany, and geology — into their curriculum. 2. That the bursaries should be determined by examination in the usual manner by the Society's examiners. 3. That the £20 bursaries should be tenable for one year at the Universities, for tlie purpose of enabling the holders to take the classes necessary to qualify for the Society's certificate or diploma ; and the £10 bursaries to be tenable for the same period, to enable the holders to receive another year's preparation at school. 4. That the age of candidates for the bursaries at the Universities should not be less than 17, and at schools not less than 16 years. 5. That the present scheme of the Society's examinations should be modified so as to admit of a lower award, or second-class certificate. 6. That the awards in future] should consist of a diploma,' first-class certificate, and second-class certificate. 7- That the examination for the second-class certificate should comprise the principle and practice of agriculture, agricultural chemistry, surveying and farm engineering, and farm accounts. The examination forthe first-class certificate should include the compulsory sub- jects of the second-class certificate, and any three of the following optional subjects — botany, geology, physics or mechanics, me- teorology or climate, natural history, and veterinary practice ; and that the examination for the diploma should remain as at present. 8. That a standing acting committee of the Council on Agricultural Education should be appointed by the di- rectors. The Chairman said he hoped the meeting quite clearly un- derstood tha' the £300 which the Council of Education pro- posed to give annually must be paid out of the sum of £550 which he had said was available. It was mentioned on page 11 of the premium list, clause viii. — " That a sum not exceed- ing £100 per annum shall be placed at the disposal of the examiners, to be applied in prizes to candidates who pass with distinguished merit, and on a standard exceeding that required for the diploma." He might explain that that sum had also to be taken out of the £550. Mr. Walker (Bowland) suggested that it might be con- venient to the members of the Society who were not generally conversant with the subject that this report should he passed from, and that the discussion should take place after they had heard the reports on both subjects. This was approved of. Sir Thomas Hepburn read the following resolution : ' Tliat the Highland and Agricultural Society accepts with regret Professor Anderson's resignation of the appointment of chemist to the Society whicli he has held since IStO. That the Society convey to Dr. Anderson its expression of deep regret that the state of his healtli has compelled him to abandon his important duties both in the Society and in the University of Glasgow. That the Society in the fullest manner recognises the importance of the services whicli Dr. Anderson has ren- dered to the science of chemistry by bis original researches, and to the Higliland Society's chemical department by the fidelity and accuracy of the work executed on its behalf by him. Tliat the Society convey to Dr. Anderson its cordial wishes for the enjoyment of ease and comfort in the retirement which the state of his health has compelled him to seek. That the above resolutions be recorded in the minutes of the Society, and that an extract thereof be communicated to Dr. Anderson by tlie secretary." The resolution was unanimously adopted. Professor Dewar read the following report : " Chemical Laboratory, Clyde Street Hall, June 16, 1874. " Daring tiie past six months, the work of the Chemical Department has been greatly increased. The substances analysed have included simple and compound manures, guanos, volatile waters, refuse substances, and stomachs of animals suspected to have died from the action of poisons. No grave cases of adulteration have come under my observation, and I believe the plan now adopted by many agriculturists of buying the essential ingredients of plant food, and mixing them according to the require- ments of tlie soil and the crop, is tending greatly to diminish the system of vending defective manures. At the same tinie that this plan of applying manures is most advantageous to the farmer, it is more satisfactory to the Society's chemist, as he can recommend the mixture that ought (as far as experi- ments have been made) to be most likely to yield good results. Further, the adoption of this course by the far-mers generally would greatly diminish the difticulties that are apt to arise in the estimation of the values of complex manures, and also to shorten the time and labour of the analytical processes. I have learned from various agriculturists that a feeling exists that the fees for analyses are in some eases too high, and that something ought to be done to lower them. This, 1 believe, may be etfected through the Sjciety favouring the prosecution of original investigations in the laboratory ; so that well- educated young men might be induced, from tlie quality of the scientific instruction they would receive, to become, after some time, useful assistants in the discharge of the Society's work." The Chairman then stated that, from what he had already said, he dared say that the meeting did not expect that any report should now be brought forvvard. Tliey had had a great many proposals before them, which were all on the table ; but if it was thought necessary, they could ail be read. To do so would occupy a great deal of time; and perhaps the best plan would be to read the last proposal, which had been drawn up by a small committee. Mr. Menzies read the report of the sub-committee on the chemical department, which was in the following terms : " The secretary read a memorandum detailing the various schemes suggested for the rc-adjustment of tlie chemical department, and the chairman siimmitted a view of the income and expen- diture of the Society. Your committee have considered tlie various proposals for the appointment of a c ■' niist, and find 118 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. the amounts proposed to be more tliaa the Society can afford. From the fiaancial statement your committee find that no greater sura than £550 is available for the schemes suggested, both chemical and educational. This sum is made up as fol- lows: (1) Professor Anderson's salary, £300; (2) Professor Dewar's salary, £150 ; (3) Vote to chair of cattle pathology which has expired, £100 — total, £550. Your committee therefore recommend the appointment of a chemist at a salary of — say £500 a year, who shall be restricted from making analyses for manufacturers of manures, feeding stuffs, and other substances, for the purpose of trade advertisements. With reference to his general duties in carrying on field experiments, analyses, original investigations in agricultural chemistry, &c., it should be referred to the chemical committee to draw up regulations, stating what assistance he should be provided with. The chemist to be entitled to the fees for analyses, and to be at the entire expense of keeping up a laboratory." Mr Murray Graham (Murrayshall) stated that before the more important discussion commenced on the reports they had just heard, he might perhaps be permitted to say a word with reference to a request made to him by several agricul- turists in the neighbourhood of Perth as regarded the inspec- tion of tlieir purchases of artificial manures. The use of these had increased very much of late, and the agriculturists to whom he had referred found that the chemist in Edinburgh was hardly enough, so far as their convenience went, for the whole work. They would mucii desire to have trustworthy men appointed in the central towns in which the various shows of the Society were held, to whom they could have recourse. They might appoint a chemist of their own by subscription, but from various circumstances which had occurred recently, they were much more desirous that the matter should be left in the hands of the Society. The long purses and fees given by agricultural companies had rather an injurious effect as compared with the smaller resources of the farmers. Mr. Murray stated that several years ago they were able to fund some money, but in consequence of the expressed desire of the members to enlarge their expenses, they for the last two or three years had funded nothing. It was perfectly true that they had, by desire of the society, invested £1,500 for what was called the building fund, it being the desire of many to remove from their present building to another. Notliiug, however, had been added to it since last year. Mr. HUi\TER (Blackness) stated that in one of the last reports he found tliat the funds of the Society were something like i£'56,000. He thought the Society was too rich already, because it was getting quite independent of public opinion. Lord Kiunaird lately wrote a letter in which lie stated that the expenses were something like £1,500, and that statement was never corrected. He thought that a statement of the accounts should be presented to every member of the Society twice in the year. Mr. Harvey (Whittingham Maine) thought they must get on to business. They had been a long time at this chemical department. They had already the services of Mr. Dewar, wlio had read a very able paper, and, in the meantime, he tliought the best course for them to adopt was to instruct the Secretary to advertise for a first-class chemist at a salary of not less than £500 a-year. He remarked that it was very heartless to see so few farmers present. He thought, from what lie heard out of doors, that greater interest would have been taken in this appointment. The chemist they appointed might analyse what the members sent to him, and keep a register ; and, if necessary, an increase might be given to tiie £500. Who was the great ornament of the English Society but Dr. Voelcker ? He thought that if the Scotch Society were to get such a man it would resuscitate its energies, and add to its popularity. Out of doors they heard nothing but despondency, and that they were going on like a lot ot old wives. He had been told that a hundred times. They ought to have the best chemist for agricultural purposes in Europe if possible, and they could get that if they took the proper means of doing so. Mr. D. Milne Home ( Wedderbnrn) said that they had before the meeting two documents, one of which recommended cer- tain bur.-aries to [be approved of by the society. The other document was not a report from tlie directors at all. It was a report from a sub-committee with regard to the chemical department ; and it appeared from the statement that there were only two gentlemen who attended on that occasion, and drew out this report. The Secretary : They were all present. Mr, Milne Home : There were three — Mr. Murray, Sir Thomas Hepburn, and Mr. Walker. Mr. jWalker (Bowland) : Allow me to correct a misap- prehension. The sub-committee were present at a meeting at which the whole subject was fully discussed. They were ap- pointed to draw up a report for the information of this meet- ing on the resolution which the chemical committee, or rather the directors, after hearing the report of the chemical committee, had come to. Therefore, the conclusions in that report are not the conclusions of the sub-committee, but an embodiment of the conclusions of a larger meeting. Mr. Milne Home said he was still right that the directors had not approved of the report of the sub-committee, and they had only that report as to the appointment of a chemist. It also appeared that £550 was all that was available both for the chemical and educational departments. They had a report from the Council, at which the Lord Justice-General, Chan- cellor of the University of Edinburgh, presided, and approved of by the directors, submitted to this meeting, and therefore they had a distinct and definite plan with reference to tha educational question, while they had only that short report in regard to the chemical one. They had now considered the suggestion of Mr. Walker, of Bowland, that it was desirable that the meeting should go into the educational question and the chemical question together, or whether the whole of these questions were to be shelved and delayed for consideration. It would be an unfortunate thing if they were not to come to some resolution on these questions at this meeting. They had spent six months in considering them, and both of them had undergone great consideration by the directors, who had, especially on the educational one, the benefit of the assistance of the Council on Education. He begged leave to say that twenty-five years ago the Society considered the matter of such importance that they were at the expense of going to the Crown and getting a charter to enable them to commence the work of agricultural education. They felt that it was of great importance that the farmers who raised stock and used implements should have the knowledge to enable them to use these implements and raise that stock ; and they understood that a knowledge of science, mechanics, chemistry, and so forth, was necessary to carry on agriculture on a proper footing. He)did not approve of the method which the Society at that time adopted for communicating agricultural science. What they said was this — " We will grant a diploma and also a certificate to any who will stand a difficult examination in chemistry and other branches." What had been the re- sult during the last twenty-five years ? How many gentlemen did they think had gained the diploma of those who had been induced to go on with the subject of agricultural instruction ? According to a blue-book published the other day, the whole number was just twenty-six, or about one individual for each year during the time that this society had had its charter. That of itself would show how insuflicieni the means were which the directors had adopted for agricultural instruction. Then, if they looked at the names of these twenty-six persons, they found that twenty-three of them obtained their education in England. They got it at the College of Cirencester, and other places where such instruction was given. Only three Scotchmen had the instruction necessary for the diploma, and perhaps these gentlemen got their instruction in England also. If they asked the Professor of Agriculture whether he was satisfied or not with the means existing in this country for enabling young men to come to his classes, he stated that a large number of these young men were unable to understand his lectures, because they had not received the necessary in- struetion in chemistry and other branches. Therefore it was that this proposal had been brought forward to encourage agricultural education more in schools. This committee, with the Lord Justice-General at its head, recommended them to give bursaries to encourage young men to come to the agri- tural classes in the Universities, and to encourage middle-class schools to teach those branches necessary prepare young farmers to come to the university for further instruction. They had ascertained that most of the school- masters throughout the country, not merely in the middle- class schools, but likewise in the primary schools, were quite ready to begin this if they were only encouraged to do so by resolutions passed by the Highland Society inviting and en- couraging them to give that instruction. Colonel Innes, of Learney, who was present, would tell them that in Aberdeen- THiB FAIIMEII*S MAGA^INEi 119 shire thefe was a large number of schools where chemistry was being taught ; and he (Mr. Milne Home) had personal knowledge that there were seven or eight middle-class schools, such as Dollar Institution, prepared to give such instruction if the scheme of the directors was adopted. The bursaries were of two classes — £20 and £10. The former were for those able to attend the university classes —those who showed such knowledge and proficiency in the middle-class schools as to be able to Duderstand Professor Wilson's lectures ; and the £10 bursaries were for those not quite up to the mark, but suffi- ciently up in it as to show that they were making fair pro- gress. They were to receive these to enable them to continue their education in these middle-class schools. Here, there- fore, was a distinct and intelligibe plan — the plan adopted by the Royal English Agricultural Society, who had set aside £500 a year for bursaries in order to encourage youn^r men to attend the middle-class schools or the colleges in England, Scotland, or Ireland. The people of England saw and ac- knowledged the necessity of encouragina; agricultural instruc- tion, and now, when circumstances required more scientific education than thirty or forty years ago — education implying a knowledge of chemistry, mechanics, and tlnngs of that kind — would it be said that the Highhnd Society felt so little interest in encouraging this as to let it go to the ground, and, that having a charter, it was not to do anything to put itself on a right footing? Their past efforts had been an entire failure, and had not encouraged that education in Scotland that it was desirable to encourage. vV^hen they had this definite place and this £550 of surplus, they had the means of encouraging that most important object, and they should approve of what was laid on the table by the directors. In concluding, Mr. Milne Home said it was ridiculous to suppose that a chemist could be obtained and his labora- tory kept up for £550 a year. The Einance Committee made a very important suggestion to the directors. At present they spent £4<40 a year in giving gratuitous copies of the Transactions to all the members of the Society. He thought that that was unnecessary. Let those who wished to read the Transactions pay their 4s. or 5s. for the Transactions, and then the Society would be in funds. He moved that the Education Council's report be adopted, and the chemical matter remitted back again to the directors for further con- sideration. Mr. Handyside (Edinburgh) said he thought that the meet- ing might have received from the directors a little more than a bundle of reports, and that it would have been far better if matters had been brought before them in a more adjusted manner. In regard to the two proposals he thought they were bound to do something for those who had bourne the brunt of the matter, and that perhaps the best thing, in the first place, was to look after the chemical department. He did not think that the farmers reposed that confidence in the chemical department which they ought to do, but the directors should see that it was made of real advantage to the members. The Chaikman said that the directors were divided in opinion in regard to the chemical department, and that was where the difficulty lay. If they could have come to a decision as to what was best for the members, no doubt there would have been a report. Mr. Hope said he agreed with almost all that Mr. Milne Home had said. He was most anxious for the education of the youns, but the benefit of the farmers was also most impor- tant. He would second the motion that it be remitted to the directors to appoint a chemist at as high a salary as possible. They could not get a first-rate chemist for the money ; but if they went to Germany, from which Voelcker came, he had no doubt they would get a very good man. Mr. GoODLET (Bolshan) seconded Mr. Milne Home's motion. It was stated that there was a sum of only £550 at disposal. Now he thought that, in order to make a thorough inquiry into the state of the funds, they would require to go deeper into it than the length they seemed to have gone. There were many outlays on the part of the Society which might be turned to proper account ; and he believed if a com- mittee were to go over the expenditure of the Society, instead of £560 they would get a couple of thousands of pounds. If they got that sum, then they would be enabled to adopt Mr. Harvey's proposal as to the appointment of a chemist, and also Mr. Milne Home's as to education. Both things were necessary. It was accessary that they should have a chemist employed solely by the farmers, lo that there would be no suspicion in regard to him as there might be regarding on^ employed by those who sold manures. It surprised him to hea that the Society was poverty-struck, whose funds amounted to £56,000. If the Society had such a large sum of money, surely it would be possible to give a thousand or two to carry out the two proposals. He thought it would be well tiiat there should be an examination of the books to see what really could be saved out of the present expense. Mr, Milne Home had spoken about the expense of supplying the Transactions to the members. He himself had read them, and he thought there was an immense mass of rubbish published. Then he thought they might save a good deal of money that was now given towards local societies, as he thought that these local societies should raise sufficient money for their own purposes. Then there was money that might be saved from premiums given for essays that were not worth it. They gave out subjects which, if properly written about, would require a high educa- tion. They had really no results from these essays, or if there were any results they were not worth having. He hoped that an inquiry would be made, so as to let them see whether they could not save more money than the paltry £550. Mr. Melvin said that if Mr. Goodlet would propose a resolution to investigate the expenditure of the Society, he would second the motion. He would like neither to oppose Mr. Milne Home's motion nor to curt and weaken the pro- posal to appoint a chemist. If they voted in favour of Mr. Milne Home's motion without knowing what funds there were they might not be able to appoint a chemist, which would be a pity. The question of education was the thing that many years ago broke up the chemical association. He thought it would be extremely desirable that a motion such as that pro- posed by Mr. Goodlet should be made, and that both questions should be postponed till there was areport from the committee, which should consist of several influential persons, of whom some should be farmers. Mr. Walker (Rowland) said he entirely agreed with what Mr. Melvin had said, and the hght in which the matter had occurred to that gentleman showed the reason why the directors did not come forward with a more distinct statement The difficulties he felt were those which the directors had to encounter, and could not overcome. They had received from the convener of the Finance Committee a statement of their income and expenditure. They found that the present expenditure of the Society, including the £550, amounted to £4,032, while the average income of the Society, on an aver- age of five years, amounted to £4,081. Now, it was out of the power of the directors to increase the expenditure for education or the chemistry department. Various suggestions had been made. The directors had no power to alter the destination of the funded money. It must be done under the rules of the charter, which required due notice and the sanc- tion of certain meetings. Another proposition was made with regard to the publication of the Transactions, which cost £445. It was thought that that expense might be diminished, or altogether abandoned. Now, the arrangement as to the Transactions was agreed to by a distinct expression at a meet- ing that the system of selling the reports should be given up, and so it was not in the power of the directors to alter it. It was under these circumstances that it was proposed that a chemist should be appointed, who should devote hia whole time to the Society, and keep up a laboratory — the estimated expense of which would be about £1,200, while the Committee on Education recommended a grant of £300. The directors could not recommend any one of these schemes. A Member : They did. Mr. Walker : They proposed one involving a cost of £550. These were organic changes, and he thought they should be carefully considered, and not entered into rashly. If they involved themselves either in pecuniary difficulties or in a system that was not thoroughly satisfactory, they would have very great difficulty in afterwards getting out of it. The moment tliey diminished their capital sura, the more their annual income would be diminished ; and he thought if they retained the other objects of the Society, they should be very careful not to reduce the capital sum. It had arisen to a large extent from life subscriptions, and that ought to be divided over a number of years. Mr. Hope : But if you have got a capital of £56,000 ? Mr. Walker : We are not accumulating now. Mr. Scot Skirving said he thought it would clear the way so far if they were to come to a conclusion whether they 120 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. would have one first-rate cliernist or a number of youn» men. Tliere was a gentleman present from Perthshire ulio said they (lid not want one man iu Edinburgh or Glasgow, but half-a- dozen men. Sir Thomas Hepburn said he tlionghttbat a special meet- ing siiould be called for the purpose of considering the various proposals, as a number of the members were not aware of the nature of them. Mr. George Harvey said they could not do otherwise than appoint a first-class chemist, lie was equally anxious to see the young instructed. He never opposed that; but they must comraeuce with the appointment of a chemist. After the chemist was appointed, he thought it would be advisable then to see what he (tlie chemist) would recommend to be done with the money at the command of the Society. He proposed that they should advertise for a chemist ; but lie wished it to be understood that he was not opposed to the education of the young. It was most important to instruct the young ; but a number of tliose present, who were old fogies, wished to have some instruction also, to know what they were about, to know whether they were paying £10 for what might be really worth only £5. They must have a first- class chemist — a man of undoubted fame— a man who would consult with the farmers, and let them know what, in his opinion, was the most suitable mode of experimenting. Mr. RouGiinEAD (Haddington) said he considered it of the utmost importance to the Society to have a cliemist. The whole thing was in a nutshell. They spent at present upwards of £400. In Germany there were the first-class chemists of the day ; and he believed if they were to advertise for a Ger ■ man chemist, they would get a young man for £600 or £700 a-year. He had no doubt that a young energetic chemist coming here would get pupils, and instruct the young farmers and the general public. lie thought it was of importance that they should luive a young man devoted to the purposes of the Society — to see that the farmer got the manures genuine ; and not only that, but to explain what were the best manures to apply to the soil. It would have the effect of allowing the tenantry to come in contact with the chemist, and have conversations with him, which would be of great advantage, both to the farmers as well as the proprietors of the soil, iarmers had done much in regard to the rearing of stock, but they ought not only to pay attention to that depart- ment but also to the cereals of the country, and to get chemistry applied to make them more productive. He thought that that was more important Ihari the education of the young. The young ought to be taught in the schools ; and to have "a good chemist was of the greatest importance. ' It would make the Society more popular, and if not done the Society would lag behind as compared with the other societies in England and Ireland. Mr. SiiiTii (Whittinghara Mains) said, that while they were all agreed that both departments were important, it must be noticed that if the motion for tlie appointment of a chemist was carried, the other matter in regard to education would he slielved. Both subjects were so intimately con- nected, that he thought it was much better for the Society and for all parties that the one should not be lost sight of for the other. Mr. Milne Hojie said lie had no objection to allow the educational question to lie over along with the other. Tiie Society could suffer no prejudice, because they had heard a very able report from Mr. Dewar, who was Dr. Anderson's assistant. He did not know a more able chemist than Mr. Dewar iu the country, and he thought they could well allow that gentleman another six months. Mr. RouGHiiEAU said he had no doubt of Mr. Dewar's abilities, but probably they would get a young man to act at a much lower rate tlian that for whicii they could expect Mr. Dewar to perform the duties (('ries of " No, no"). Mr. EiNDLAY Anderson said he thought there was a very strong desire that both questions should be disposed of in a satisfactory manner. The difliculty had been a difficulty in regard to funds. Mr. Walker said that the directors had no right to change the destination of the funds. But he thought that, after the strong expression of the opinions of parties, eitlier as regarded the chemistry or the education question, it would have the effect on the directors of leading them to con- sider the question whether tliey could not devise the ex'pendi- ture of the Society so as to allow a sum for both these things. Let them revise the whole of the accounts, and see whether t ley could not, at another meeting, arrange by which both tlipse olijecfs might be carried on. Professor Balfouk said he did not see wliy they should go to Germany for a cheap chemist. It was ridiculous to suppose that they would get a chemist and a laboratory kept up for £550. He agreed with the proposal that the matter ought to be delayed. Mr. Melvin moved, " That the meeting ask the directors to' appoint a committee of their own number and others to investigate the income and outlay of the Society, and to endeavour to provide sufficient funds for the purposes of the chemistry department and education. Delay consideration of these subjects in the meantime." Mr. Walker (Bowland) seconded the motion. The Chairman : Perhaps Mr. Harvey and Mr. Milue Home withdraw their motions. Mr. Milne Home said he would withdraw his motion in favour ot that which was now proposed. Mr. George Harvey said he would withdraw his motion at once. He thought the Chairman should dismiss them, as they could not agree to anything. When he was a director they generally agreed about everything. There was no plea- sure in doing anything connected with the directory. In Mr. Hall Maxwell's time there was no jarring except on some special occasions. Mr. Melvin said there was one remark he would like to make, and that was, that he hoped the directors would early consider the matter, so that they would be prepared to report to the first general meeting of the Society, so that the matter could be decided at once. The Chairman said he was sure that the directors would take up the matter at once. Mr. George Harvey said he had great respect for Mr. Dewar, whose report was admirable, so far as he had been en- gaged. He would not say anything against Mr. Dewar. Perhaps he might be the chosen man after advertising, and in that case they would have no cheap Germans, as Pro- fessor Balfour said. There were many cantankerous men among the directors, and this meeting seemed not less so. The Chairman said it was quite understood that every- thing connected with the educational and chemistry depart- ments was deferred for the present. The Hon. George Waldegrave Leslie : Except that Mr. Dewar is retained. The Chairman : Yes, he has got an appointment. Mr. Melvin's motion was then agreed to. Colonel Innes (Learney) said he had made a proposa that the Privy Council, as representing the Department of Science and Art, should take up the subject of agriculture as well as other subjects that were to be taught in the primary schools. The directors unanimously came to a resolution approving of his proposal, and as it involved no difficulty as ta expense, he trusted it would now be submitted for the approval of the meeting, and that the memorial be forwarded to Govern- ment. Mr. Milne Home's proposal was to obtain bursaries for students in primary and secondary schools, to enable them to pursue a higher education iu agriculture in the Universities. His (Colonel Innes') proposal was a very modest one. It was to the effect that whereas the practice of agriculture now involved the application of science, it was necessary that instruction in the application of science to agriculture should be diffused generally among all classes of agriculturists, and that that could be done by that education beginning in the primary schools. It would be out of the question for the Society to operate on the primary schools ; but in the Science and Art Department there was the whole organisation ; and if tliey got the consent of the Privy Council to take up agricul- ture as one of their branches, it would open to the humblest agriculturist the means of getting information as to the application of science to agriculture. The following was tlie resolution adopted by the directors : " (1). That the Society memorialise the committee of the Privy Council on Education on the propriety of esta- blishing agriculture as a branch of the system of physical bscience taught under the superintendence of the Department of Science and Art in the schools and classes. (2). That the Society offer a premium for the best text book for such a course, including the application of botany, geology, chemistry, and animal physiology to the art of agriculture and the ma- nagement of farm stock." He held in his hand, when he made the proposal, a letter from a schoolmaster in the county of THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 121 Aberdeen, who occupied tlie positioa of chairraau of the Association of Schoolmasters in three of the northern dis- tricts. It stated that 150 schoolmasters were ready to under- take that branch of education. Tlierefore, when they liad such a cotnplete organisation ready to enable the people to acquire a knowledge of the application of science to agriculture, it seemed to hira that there could be no hesitation whatever as to the adoption of the proposal. Although there might be doubts as to the application of thousands a year, there could be no doubt as to the small expense necessary to carry out such a scheme as he proposed. He moved that the resolution adopted by the board of directors be carried. Mr. Milne Home seconded the motion. He said tliere was no discrepancy between C»lonel Innes and himself in regard to the matter. This proposal was with the view of securing not merely to primary schools, but to other schools, those liberal grants given in cases in which certain sciences were taught. There were at present 119 schools which were drawing grants from the Kensington Department for chemistry, botany, and other branches ; but it appeared that the chemistry that was taught was not in relation to agriculture, but manufac- tures, aud whnt the teachers wished was to have it extended to agriculture. They were prepared to give it their hearty support provided that agricultural chemistry be adopted by the Science and Art Departments. He wrote last week making inquiry into the subject, and the reply was that the grants were limited to other subjects than agriculture ; but he had no doubt that as the object of that department was to educate the working classes of the country, they would be able to extend the grants to agriculture as well as to other subjects. At the same tiiue, he did not confine his desire to the extension of grants to the primary schools. He had no reliance on the middle schools ; and he believed that if the grants from Kensington were, extended they would apply to all schools. Professor Balfour said he thought that in regard to the elementary schools they did not want the practical application of science to agriculture. AVIiat they wanted in the elementary schools was to teach the elements of the sciences. There were no means of thoroughly testing the knowledge of the pupils in the elementary schools. In regard lo the Kensing- ton department, the answers were sent to London, and the matter was decided there. But surely we in Scotland were able to carry on the work ourselves. Let them give a good practical education in the middle schools, aud they might de- pend on it that the elementary education would follow in the primary schools. He was sure that as the higher education was being carried on well, the other departments would be well attended to without the Science and Art Department re- quiring to come in. Mr. Milne Home said he had no donbt that the examina- tion could be carried on as well here as in Loudon — perhaps better — but it was a (act tliat ought to be kept in view that 43 schools last year received £1,700. The motion was then agreed to. The Secretary reported tliat an exhibition of steam culti- vators was to be held under the auspices of the Society, in the vicinity of Edinburgh, early in the autumn of 1871). Tiie exhibition would not be competitive, but each exhibitor would have the opportunity of showing the full working power of his apparatus. The Hon. Waldegrave-Leslie then moved: "That this meeting is of opinion that, considering the scarcity of labour, the uncertain state of the labour market, the high price of horses and of horse fodder, the Highland and Agricultural Society should in every way encourage all attempts to intro- duce an improved system of steam cultivation at remunerative prices, and that the directors be requested to assist the cause of steam cultivation by every means in their cower." Professor Wilson seconded the motion, which was adopted, and the proceedings then terminated. THE ROYAL COUNTIES (HANTS AND BERKS) AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT READING. The management of this Society still continues to be of a curiously primitive character, as one comes to question whether the stewards and other ofQcers can ever have seen any show but their own. For some hours the two sets of cattle judges were working away, so far as the public was concerned, utterly in the dark. Class after class came in and went out again with nothing more known than that the judges had entered some mysterious marks in their note-books. No colours were given out, no winning numbers were announced, and thus the whole effect of the thing was destroyed. Through the courtesy of a judge we could occasionally get a glimpse of what was going on, but more commonly one had to wv.it about the stalls until in due course the prize placards were put up. Anything so crude or so thoroughly unsatisfac- tory we have not witnessed for many a long day ; and unless the committee can arrange for public judging on a better system, it might perhaps be as well to get through this work with closed doors, as under the circumstances the admission charge of half-a-crown is taken under some- thing very like false pretences, the visitor getting more for his money on the shilling days. Remarkably enough, moreover, in the horse- ring the colours were handed to the winners as the awards were arrived at ; and here of course the very pertinent ques- tion arises as to why the stewards of stock did not act in concert with the stewards of horses ? It is very possible that some people took quite as much interest iu tlie Jersey cows as others did in the cart-mares, although here un- questionably was the strongest feature of the show. The class ran up to between twenty and thirty, aud with very little exception the class might have been generally com- mended. The majority of the mares, backed often enough by some capital foals, were really adapted for agricultural purposes, and not over-weighted animals from the drays or the Shires. Smart, active, an 1 comely, they looked like doing the work of the farm, and as they spread over the roomy ring, it was evident the judges had something to do. They, however, settled down to a well-grown handsome grey, who showed better out than in, aud came from close by at Whitley Grove. In fact, like Mr. Hutchinson's second and third prizes again, many of the best mares were handy home, as from the sample they must have a good sort hereabouts, the class beiug one, alike for numbers and merits, which would have done credit to any society. Amongst the cart stallions Messrs. Stanford's Duke now beat the second-prize horse put above him at Bristol, as he should then have done, but, as we wrote of it, " the judges would not have the Clydes or Suffoiks," notwithstanding that the Duke has now furnished into a very taking horse. He was further " proved" here by two or three of his stock also placed on the prize-list, aud the show of cart horses pretty generally was good enough at Reading to make a prize worth having ; a particularly clever chesuut from Tvvyford winning in the two-year-old stallion class, where the entries occasionally e.fpauded iuto voluminous his- tories. The " nags" were about as bad as the draught horses were good ; though Mr. Pain won in the hunter class with a powerful grey, who ouly wanted a horseman on his back to do better ; whilst the best hack, smart enough to stand alongside of, could not walk, trot, nor canter, but went shuffliug about with his head up in a manner or with " manners" quite at variance with all notions of a good hack ; and no question but, at all points as a really nice riding horse, Mr. Alfred Howlaud's better bred blaok should have been put first. 122 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZlKfii It is seldom that so many plain common-looking beasts have been got together under the denomina- tion of highly-bred Shorthorns as were exhibited at Reading. A majority, indeed, of the prize takers were the mere culls from Bristol, with Lady Pigot, the York- shire and the Cornish eneries of the West now well out of the way. Protector, however, was again the best bull, though with absolutely nothing to beat ; and the useful Prince Rupert won in another class of no consequence, the second best, with only half a pedigree attached to his nomination, having fairly broken down behind. In the cow class the highly commended of Clifton, Euphocmia, was first, and another useful heifer from one of the brothers Stratton also won in the next class ; but amongst the yearlings. Brilliant Flower was put out by a gaudy-coloured, drooping animal never noticed at Bristol ; and far away the most promising heifer of the lot, straight and stylish, was Her Majesty's Cawlina, which got no nearer than third. The best heifer-calf was the best at Bristol, where as we said there was scarcely anything of " much account ;" and Shorthorn winners outright from the Western meeting which won again at Reading did so under very similar circumstances, that is, in bad company. Her Majesty supplied the Hereford show in three en- tries which took three prizes ; and the Royal farms were first and second for Devon bulls, and Mr. Senior first for cows and first for heifers, with a pair, however good, still so terribly overfed that the judges might have exercised their discretionary power as to such beasts being in place at a breeding show. "The judges took for their best cow an animal of size and weight, but not of the nice character of the second best from Crawley ; as even the other cow from Mr. Duke's herd, the highly commended from Slinfold, or the brothers Stanford's entry were more comely and suggestive of the milk-pail." It was thus that we ventured to speak of the well-filled Sussex cow class at Bristol ; and in the Sussex cow class at Reading Messrs. Stanford's cow was placed Urst, and Mr. Duke's first at Bristol nmohere in a class of four ! as it did not require a Sussex judge to pronounce against her steery head and general coarseness, the one now preferred being a far sweeter coio. But for cows, as cows, that is as producers of milk and butter, the public now turns to " the Alderueys," as they were once called, or " the Channel Islanders," as they are now written, of which, so far as the Jerseys went, there was a capital entry at Reading, set off by scarcely a Guernsey. And here Mr. Tait must either pride himself on his in- consequential impartiallity, or plead his minority ; for amongst the cows Mr. Digby's Miss Edith, the best of all at Bristol, was now never noticed ! the highly commended. Tal of the other day being now placed above her, and Mr. Gilby winning outright with his famous old Milkmaid — such a cow still at over seven years old ! despite her broken horn. But this class of Jersey cows ■would rank well with the cart mares, there being a deal of good about, beyond the mere winners, from Mr. Simp- son at Wray, Mr. Fuller of Dorking, Mr. Bonham Carter, Mr. Drewitt, and Mr. W'ingfield Digby. There was another almost equally excellent entry of heifers, wherein the Hargrave Fan was not to be found, though Mr. Simpson was again second, while the winner turned up in Adhurst Flower, a neat, pretty heifer, although the decision in her favour was not altogether fancied by " the fancy." Mr. Drewitt's best old bull is very handsome, as he has taken the attention of the judges before now ; while a nice two-year-old from the same herd was well beaten for first by Queen's Favourite, rather a favourite of ours, as a handsome, lengthy, high-bred bull, only lacking a little more "devil" in his expression. Your Jersey bull should let you know by his Very look that he is a very resolute gentleman. There was naturally a great show of Hampshire Downs, the judges speaking to the more general classes of ewes and of lambs in lots as particularly use- ful ; while the Cotswold entry also ran up to some length of fairly good sheep from most of the prize flocks now about ; but Lord Chesham had the Shropshires all to himself, as had Messrs. Wallis andDruce the Oxfords, where the Witney awards were " revised ;" as was the old class of Southdown rams ; Mr. Gorringe now beating the Prince's sheep, which was pronounced to be the better of the two last season. His Royal Highness, however, was first for shearlings with a ram commendable for size, but showing little Southdown character, being bad about his head, wrong in his shoulders, and wrong in his wool, and either of the Heasman's sheep should have been pre- ferred. The one put second was commended at Bristol ; but as true a type of a Southdown as anything in the show was another smaller and unnoticed shearling from Angmering, for size does not or sliould not make a Southdown. Still Mr. Gorringe's pretty bloodlike pen of ewes did win, although the other judges seemed to be going for something bigger, until, no doubt, discom- fited by Mr. Rigden's eloquent ratiocination. Berkshire pigs were, as of course they should be, quite n the ascendant in Berkshire, with the Duckerings doing by far the best amongst the other breeds, where the small blacks and small whites joined direct issue after a some- what perplexing fashion, white having rather the call over Lord Portsmouth's pretty pigs, the decision against his lordship's young boar being not so self-evident to any beyond those in authority. The " palatial" stand of the Messrs. Sutton was faced by the " palatial" stand of the Messrs. Carter — very emporiums of seeds and roots, set off and framed and baized like choice picture or cabinet curiosities ; while the exhibitors of machinery in motion included Wallis and Steeveus, Basingstoke ; Humphries, Pershore ; The Reading Iron Works Co. ; Vosper and Clark, Ports- mouth ; Wilder, Reading ; Nalder and Nalder, Wantage ; Marshall, Sons, and Co., Gainsborough ; Gibbons, Wantage; Tasker and Sons, Andover; and Cottrell and Co., Hungerford. The other exhibitors of implements and machinery were Bradford and Co., High Holborn, Loudon ; Heelas, Sons, and Co., Reading ; Busse and Co., 8, South-street, Finsbury, London ; Belcher, Gee, and Co., Gloucester ; W^ood, Worship-street, London ; Smith, Basingstoke ; Stacey and Lace, Newbury ; Smith, Kettering ; Benjamin and Gold, New W^ind- sor ; Gower and Son, Winchfield ; Thomas and Taylor, Stockport and Salford ; Apted, Guild- ford ; Ashby, Jetfery, and Luke, Stamford ; Spong and Co., Charing Cross, London ; Parker, Woodstock ; Milford, Cullompton ; Sears and Co., Fenchnrch- street, London ; Maurice de Leon and Co., Oxford- street, London; King, Reading; Brown and Co., Charlotte-street, Blackfriars , Fox, Reading ; Baker, Newbury; Samuelson and Co., Banbury ; The Farmers' Supply Association ; The Johnston Harvester Co., New York ; H. Duffield, Regent's Park, London ; Picksley, Sims, and Co., Leigh; Waide, Leeds ; Hetherington and Parker, Alton ; Vincent, Arborfield, Reading ; Crump, Tewkesbury ; Down and Co., Woburn ; Ohlendorff and Co., Fenchurch-street, London ; Osmond, Hungerford ; Forbes, Albany-street, Regent's Park ; Nicholson and Son,' Northampton ; Hancock, Dudley ; Hol- lings Brothers, Swindon; Heard, Euston-road, London ; Burney and Co., Millwall Docks, Lon- don; Kiddle, Donhead St. Mary; Jones, Gloucester; Martin, Reading ; Bailey Brothers, Cursitor-street, Lon- THE FAUMEE'fe MAGAZINE. 123 don ; The Thorough Washing Machine Company, Burn- ley; Williams and Sons, Reading ; Beaumont and Co., Reading ; Davis and Co., Newington Butts, London ; Jacques, Dublin and London ; Player, Reading ; Cook, Reading ; Wheeler and Wilson, Regent-street, London ; Muggleton, Croydon, Surrey ; Ball, Henley-on-Thames ; Pord and Co., Bristol-road, Gloucester ; Reynolds and Co., Southwark-street, London ; Saunders, Streatley, Reading ; Lee, Gloucester ; Williams and Co., Ber- mondsey, London ; lies. Regent's Park, London ; Mrs. S. Ackerman, King's-road, Reading ; Goss, Plymouth ; Beach and Co., Dudley ; Howard, Chesham, Bucks ; Lyon, Finsbury-square, London ; Margrett, Reading ; Davies, Regent-street, London ; JMoore and Co., Upper Marylebone-street, Loudon; Unite, Paddington ; McDou- gall Brothers, Mark-lane, London ; Day and Sons, Crewe, Cheshire ; Chambers, Pimlico ; Wilson, Reading ; Stiles, Peckham, London ; Markall, Whitechapel-road, London ; Hollis and Son, Witney ; Elliman, Sons, and Co., Slough ; Wright, Portsmouth ; Swain, jun., Reading; Lawrence and Co., Notting Hill, London ; Davis, Kings- land, London ; Edwards and Suter, Swindon ; Van Praag and Co., Soho, London ; Soper, Reading ; Day, Son, and Hewitt, Baker-street, London ; Kerr, Dublin ; Tipper, Birmingham ; Sellar, Reading ; Van Stan, St. Martin's- lane, W.C. ; Hilton, Altrincham ; Bell and Co., Oxford- street ; Carter and Co., High Holborn, London ; Sutton and Sons, Reading ; Lewis and Co., Shrewsbury ; Salmon, jun., Reading ; Nike, Plymouth ; Kearsley, Ilipon; Voice, Horley, Surrey ; Isabel C. Bates, Stoke Newington, London ; Simpson and Co., Chiswell-street, London ; Phillips, Smith, and Co., Wandsworth-road, London ; Edgington, London Bridge, Soutliwark ; Sad- ler, Sonning, Reading ; Cranston and Luck, Birming- ham ; Brigham and Co., Berwick-on-Tweed ; Talbot, Reading ; Messer, Reading ; Baker, Compton, New- bury ; Watson, Andover ; Bsrtlett, Wimborne ; Head- Wrightson, and Co., Stockton-on-Tees ; Pearce, Reading ; Dennis and Co., Chelmsford ; Boulton and Co., Nor, wich ; Ren die, Victoria-street, London ; Tuck, Bath ; Milford, Kenn, Exeter. PRIZE LIST. SHEEP. Judges. — H. Bone, Bisterne, Ringwood; II. J. Newton, Campsfteld Farm, Woodstock ; J. Rigden, Hove, Brighton. HAMPSHIRE OR WEST COUNTRY DOWNS. Shearling ram. — First prize, A. Morrison, Fonthill, Tis- bury; second, R. Coles, Middleton, Warminster; third, J. Rigg, Wrothara Hill Park, Sevenoaks. Ram of any age. — W. King, New Hayward, Hungerford ; second, W. F. Bennett, Chilmark, near Salisbury, Wilts ; third, A. Chapman Saunders, Watercorabe, Dorchester. Com- mended : W. Lunn, Wooldiug Farm, Whitchurch, Hants. Five shearling rams. — First prize, W. Parsons, Monk Sher- borne, Basingstoke ; second, T. C. Saunders ; third, J. Walter, M.P„ Bearwood, Wokingham. Five shearling ewes, wliicii have never been separated from the flock till one month before the day of exliibition, the ewes to be clean shorn. — First and second prize, W. Newton, Crow- raarsh, Battle, Wallingford ; third, J. Barton, Hackwood Farm, Basingstoke. Highly commended : T. Moore, Viable's Farm, Basingstoke. Ram lamb, bred by the exhibitor. — First prize, J. Rigg ; second, A. Morrison. Highly commended : A. Twitchin, New Barn Farm, Whitchurch, and W. Parsons. Commended : W. F. Bennett. Five ram lambs, bred by exhibitor. — First prize, J. Rigg; second, A. Morrison ; third, W. Newton. Commended: W. F. Bennett and G. Edney, The Manor, Whitchurch, Hants. Five ewe lambs, bred by the exhibitor. — First prize, W. Newton; second, H. Clift, Swallick Farm, Basingstoke; third, G. Edney. Highly commended : J. A. and T. Palmer, CHd- desden, Basingstoke. Commended : A. Twitchin. Five ewes of any age, having bred a lamb this season. — J. A. and T. Palm i ; second, G. W. Homer, Athelhampton Hall, Dorchester. vSOUTHDOWNS. Skearling ram. — First prize, the Prince of Wales, K.G., Sandringhain, King's Lynn ; second, J. E. and A. Heasraan, Angraering, Arundel ; third, H. Penfold, Selsey, Chichester. Ram of any age. — First prize, H. Gorringe, Kingston-by- Sea, Shoreham ; second, the Prince of Wales ; third, H. H. Penfold. Five shearling ewes. — First prize, H. Gorringe; second, G. Smith, Paddockhurst, Crawley, Sussex. Highly commended: The Prtnce of Wales. OXFORDSHIRE DOWNS. Shearling ram. — First prize, G. Wallis, OldShifTord, Barap- ton, Farringdon ; second, A. F. M. Druce, Twelve Acre, Eyn- sham, Oxon. Ram of any age. — First prize, A. F. M. Druce ; second, G. Wallis. Five shearling ewes. — First prize, A. F. M. Diuce, Highly commended : Lieut'-Col. Lindsay, V.C., M.l'., Lockinge Park, Wantage. Commended: G. Wallis. SHROPSHIRE DOWNS, Shearling ram. — First and second prize, Lord Chesham, Latimer, Bucks. Five shearling ewes. — Prize, Lord Chesham. LONG WOOLLED SHEEP. Shearling ram. — First and third prize, Cirencester College ; second, J. Gillett, Tangley, Chipping Norton. Ram of any age. — First prize, J. Wheeler and Sons, L ng Compton, Shipston-on-Stour ; second, H. E. Rayubird, Old Basing, Hants ; third, Cirencester College. Five shearling ewes. — First and second prize, T. and S. G. Gillett. Five ewes having brei a lamb this season. — First aud second prizes, T. and S. G. Gillett; third, H. E. Raj-nbird. CROSS-BRED SHEEP. Five ram lambs, bred by the exhibitor. — First prize, Mrs. Clift, Sherborne St. John, Basingstoke ; second, R. Deacon, Bury Farm, Basingstoke. Reserved : W. Turvill, West World- ham, Alton. Five ewe lambs. — First prize, Mrs. Clift ; second, H. E. Rayubird. HORSES. TOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES. Judges.— iW. C. Spooner, Eling House, Southampton; W- Sharp, Shottesbrook, Maidenhead; T. Rush, Chalk Farm, Babraham, Cambridge. Cart stallion foaled before the year 1872. — First prize, E. and A. Stanford, Batons, Steyning, Sussex ; second, S. Davi?, Woolashill, Pershore ; third, W. Stanford, Pasildon Park, Reading. Cart stallion foaled in 1873. — First prize, E. Headington, Scarlett's Farm, Twyford, Berks ; second, J. Butler, Sherfield Court, Basingstoke ; third, G. Twitchin, Worting Wood Farm, Basingstoke. Highly commended : J. Walter, M.P., Bear- wood, Wokingham ; J. Lawes, Sindleshara Mills, Woking- ham ; and E. and A. Stanford, Batons, Steyning, Sussex. Mare and foal. — First prize, R. Attenborough, Whitley Grove, Reading ; second and third, N. G. Hutchinson, Crook- ham Manor Farm, Newbury. Highly commended : Lieut.- Col. Loyd Lindsay, V.C, M.P. Gelding foaled in 1871- — First prize, T. Simonds, Carter's Hill, Boorfield, Reading; second, T. Thorn, 39, Victoria- street, Reading; third, G. Barton, Basing Mill, Old Basing, Hants. Gelding or filly foaled in 1872.— First prize, W. Fisher, Chieveley, Newbury ; second, W. Stanford, Steyning, Sussex ; third, E. and A. Stanford. Highly commended : Lieut. -Col. Loyd Lindsay, V.C, M.P. Cart colt foaled in 1873. — First prize, W. Stanford; second, S. Davis, Woolashill, Pershore. Mare for breeding purposes. — First prize, C. J. Broadway, Pangbourne, Reading ; second, W. L. W. Chute, the Vyne, Basingstoke. Highly commended : Sir P. Hunter, Bart., Mortimer Hill, Reading. Cart gelding. — First prize, W. L. W. Chute ; second, R. Attenborough. Commended : H. Hall, Alton, Hants. HUNTERS, HAt;KS, AND PONIES. JUDGES. — The Earl of Portsmouth, Hnrstbourne-priors, Whit-Church, Hants; Sir P. Hunter, Bart.. Mortimer-hill, Reading, Berks; W. W. B. Beach, M.P-, Oakley-hall, Basingstoke, Hants. 124. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. liUNTF.RS. Mare or gelding of any apce, jumping to be a point of merit. — First prize, T. Pain, Lower Pertwood, Hindoo, Wilts ; second, Capt. J. May, Basingstoke. HACKS. Mare or gelding, not exceeding 15 hands high, and calcu- lated to carry 12 stone. — First prize, T. Siraonds; second, A. R. Howland, Ludesdou, Thame, Oxon. PO^flES. Mare or gelding not exceeding 14 hands liigli. — First prize, C. Y. Brown, Mildenhall, Marlborough ; second, the Rev. A. G. Barker, Sherfield Rectory, Basingstoke. Mare or gelding not exceeding 13 hands. — First prize, F. P. Bailey, Brown Candover, Alresford ; second, J. R. Bridle, 62, Charlotte-street, Landport. CATTLE. Judges. — Shorthorns, Herefords, Devons, and Sus- sex : J. Thompson, Badminton, Chippenham ; E. Bowley, Siddington House, Cirencester ; Q. Game, Churciiill Heath, Chipping Norton. SHORTHORNS. Bull.— First prize, R. Stratton, The Duffryn, Newport, Monmouth ; second, Lieut. -Col. Loyd Lindsay, V.C, M.P. ; 3rd, J. A. Mumfurd, Brill Ilouse, Thame, Oxon. Bull above two and under tliree years of age on the 22ud of June. — First prize, J. Walter, M.P. ; second, R. Penson, Foxcote, Chipping Norton Junction ; 3rd, R. B. Blyth, Wool- hampton, Reading. Bull above one year and not exceeding two years of age on the 22nd of June. — First prize, Lieut. -Col. Loyd Lindsay, V.C, M.P. ; second, W. Nicholson, Basing Park, Alton ; third, R. Penson. Bull-calf above six and not exceeding twelve mouths of age on the 22Hd of June. — First prize, Lieut. -Col. Loyd Lindsay, V.C, M.P.; second, T. Simonds ; third, G.Young, Ashey Farm, Brading, Lie of Wight. Cow in calf, or, if in milk, liaving had a calf within six months next preceding the 22nd of June, 1874. — First prize and higlily commended, J. Stratton, Alton Priors, Marlbo- rough ; second, R. Stratton ; third, R. B. Blyth. Com- mended : Her Majesty the Queen. Heifer in milk or in calf under three years old on the 22nd of June, 1874. — First prize, R. Stratton ; second, J. A. Mum- ford ; third, T. B. St. John Ackers, Prinknash Park, Pains- wick, Stroud. Heifer above one year and not exceeding two years of age on the 22nd of June, 1874. — First prize, W. Nicholson ; second, R. Stratton ; third. Her Majesty tlie Queen. Cow-calf above six months and not exceeding twelve mouths of age on the 22Qd of June, 1874.— First prize, R. Stratton ; second, Lieut.-Col. Loyd Lindsay, V.C, M.P. ; third, T, Kingsley, Boars' Crolt, Tring, Herts. uerefords. Bull of any age.— First and second prize, her Majesty the Queen. Hereford Cow in calf, or if in milk, having had a calf vrithln six months next preceding the 22nd of June, 1874. — First prize, her Majesty the Queen. DEVONS. Bull of any age. — First and second prize, her Majesty tlie Queen, Cow in calf, or if in milk, having had a calf within six months next preceding the 22nd of June, 1874. — First prize, T. Lee, senior, Broughton House, Aylesbury ; second. J. Tur- vill. Hartley Park Farm, Alton. Heifer under three years of age on the 22nd of June, 1874. — First prize, her Majesty the Queen; second, T. Lee, senior. SUSSEX. Bnll of any age. — First prize, J. Turvil, Hartley Park Farm, Alton. Cow in calf, or if in milk, having had a calf within six months of the 22nd of June. — First prize, E. and A. Stanford, Eatons, Steyning, Sussex. Highly commended : J. Turvil. CHANNEL ISLANDS AND AYRSHIRE. Judges. — H. Tait, the Prince Consort's Shaw Farm, Windsor ; Mr. Middleton.Cuttleslow, Oxford ; and E, Curtis, Dummer Basingstoke. CHANNEL ISLANDS. Jersey or Alderney bull of any age. — First prize, H.Drewitt, Milvill, Titchfield, Hants; second, T. B- Carter. Highly commended ; J. Bonham-Carter, Lower Adhurst, Petersfield . Jersey and Alderney bull, under two years of age on the 32nd of June, 1874. — First prize, G. Simpson, Wray Park, Reigate ; second, H. Drewett, Ticlifield. Commended and highly commended, C B. Dixon, the Vinery, Shirley Warren, Southampton. Jersey or Alderney cow in calf, or if in milk, having had a calf within six months of the 22nd of June, 1874. — First and second prize, W. Gilbey, Hargrave Park, Staustead. Highly commended: J. Bonham-Carter. Guernsey cow in calf, or if in milk, having had a calf wiihin six months of the 22nd of Ju!ie, 1874. — C. B. Dixon, the Vinery, Shirley Warren, Southampton. Jersey or Alderney heifer, not exceeding two-and-half years old on the 23nd of June, 1874. — First prize, J. Bonham- Carter ; second, G. Simpson, Wray Park, Reigate. Highly commended : Rev. A. G. Barker, Sherfield Rectory, Basing- stoke. Guernsey heifer, not exceeding two-and-a-half years old on the 22nd of June, 1874.— Prize, W. E. Fitt, Kerrfield Ilouse, Winchester. AYRSHIRE. Bull of any age. — Prize, A. J. Scott, Rotherfield Park, Alton. Ayrshire cow in calf, or if in milk having had a calf within six months of the 22nd June, 1874. — Prize, A. J. Scott, Rotherfield Park, Alton. PIGS. Judges. — A. F. M. Druce, Twelveacre, Eynsham ; J, Wliite, Broadaak, Winch field ; J. Smith, Henley-in-Arden. BERKSHIRE. Boar over twelve months of age on the 22nd June, 1874. — First prize, P». Swannick, Cirencester College ; second, li. Humphrey, Kingstone Farm, Shrivenham. Boar under twelve mouths of age on the 22nd of June, 1874. — First prize, A. C Baily, Swindon ; second, A. Stewart, Saint Bridge Farm, Gloucester. Breeding sow of any age. — First prize, R. Swannick ; se- cond, II. Humphrey. Pair of sows under nine months old on the 22nd of June, 1874. — First prize, A. Stewart , second, R. Swanwick. large BREED, NOT BEING BERKSHIRE. Boar of any age. — Prize, R. E. Duckering, Northorpe, Kirton Lindsay. Breeding sow of any age. — Prize, J. Wheeler and Sons, Long Compton, Sliipston-on-Stour. SMALL BREED, NOT BEING BERKSHIRE. Boar under twelve months of age on the 22ud of June 1874. — First prize, R. E. Duckering and Sons ; second, W. Dunn, Elcot, Hungerford. Boar under twelve months of age on the 22nd June, 1874. — I'irst prize, J. Djve, llambrook-liouse, Haniljrook, Bristol ; second. Earl of Portsmouth, Highly commended : Earl of Portsmouth. Breeding sow of any age. — First prize, R. E. Duckering and Sons ; second. Earl of Portsmouth. Pair of sows under nine months old on the 22nd of June, 1874. — First prize. Earl of Portsmouth ; second, J. Wlieeler and Sons. MOWING MACHINES. Manufacturer's class. — First prize, W. A. Wood, Worship- street, Loudon ; second, Samuelson and Co., Banbury. Farmer's class- — First prize, R. Attenborough, Whitley Grove, Reading ; second, J. Fall, Home Farm, Savernake. At the dinner the chairman, Colonel Lo^D Lindsay, M.P., said it was a matter of congratulation when those in high position had the wisdom and the good feeling to direct the fashion in such a manner as to prove advantageous to the community among whom they lived. Some of the boldest and most liberal buyers of improved breeds of cattle weie to be fouud among men whose chief time and attention were devoted to commercial affairs, and some of them who most liberally maintained the name of England at the great sale in America were men who were neitlier great owners nor occupiers of land. These men had doubtless had their attention turned to the pleasures and benefits to be derived from farming by tlie example which had been set them in the highest circles. In maintaining and sustaining the interest which was taken in high farming and in improving the condition as well as the breed of animals, they are also much indebted to such shows as that in which they had been taking part that day, and that i THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 125 held a fortniglit since at Bristol, and wliich was eminently successful. On these occasions men who had been spending hundreds of pounds on their stock deemed themselves well rewarded by receiving a smnll prize or even by being honour- ably mentioned or commended by the judges of the show. It had been frequently asserted by high authority inside the House of Commons, aiid by the highest authority outside the House of Commons, and never gainsaid that he was aware of, that England produced more corn and more meat, acre for acre, than any other country in the world ; that she had in her fields more cattle and more sheep, and that those cattle and those sheep were bigger and heavier, and that they reached that size much more quickly than they did elsewhere. All this had been effected by the energy and industry of the farmers, and by the judicious admixture of economy and liberality in the conduct of their business, aided, also, by the free expenditure of money by the more wealthy classes in pre- serving a pure-bred of cattle and by replenishing it at almost any price from the best and purest strains of blood to be found ill the world, ft was perfectly true that farmers' profits were made by close and watch'nl economy, and without it there could be no good farming, and it might seem difficult to establish at first sight, that giving £1,00U for a cow or a bull was consistent with economy. In that respect Euglish farmers were enormously liberal in their ex|.enditnre when compared with farmers on the Continent, aud they had their reward by having in their fields cattle and sheep with ."uch an aptitude to get flesh on their bones that six months' grass would do more to bring them into a condition for the butcher than twice or three times that amount of food would do when bestowed on a more skinny and bony style of animal. Such had been the efl'ect of economy combined with libera'it.y in the management of their farms ; but if they were economical in their fields, they altogether failed to carry economy into their kitchens. They placed the finest joints before their cooks, aud the result was not so good as was produced in Trance with a few odds and ends which many in their country would reject altogether. Take the evidence of their family butcher aud they would find him state that his losses often arose from not being able to dispose of those odds and ends and scraps which not only poor people but the rich made such good out of in France. This uneconomical cookery was not confined to the houses of the rich. It was much worse ia the cottages of the poor. As a rule, where the means were, smallest the waste was greatest. This amounted to a national calamity, which once recognized ought, in these practical days, to be taken in hand and, if possible, diminished or cured. Mr. R. Benyon, M.P., said he could not but think it was to be regretted that there had not been more frequent intercourse between employer aud employed, and tha*^ the farmers had not availed themselves of the opportunity of the pay-night to calmly and quietly talk over matters with those who worked under them, and endeavour to explain to them things in their proper light. If this had been tlie rule, the labourers would never had listened to the gross fallacies and the impudent assertions which had been made throughout the land by babbling demagogues whose interests were not the interests of either the agricultural labourers or the farmers, but whose sole aim was to gain money as if by a trade. He would ven- ture to refer to one matter, which was that it would be very desirable for them to encourage and support benefit societies among the labourers. He meant societies certified to be based on safe tables ; not societies the legality of whose rules was certified by the Registrar of Friendly Societies, but societies based on the best statistics relating to human life that could be obtained and approved by the best actuaries in the land. These societies would give the labourers an iudependence of character and a self-reliance, and cause them to feel indepen- dent in the time of sickness and in old age, and at the point of death to be undisturbed by any thought of the horrors of the workhouse. He would have branches of the society all over the country, so that the labourers would be enabled to transfer their contributions from one branch to another, and so go on as before ; and he would have one grand national society composed of a conglomeration of local branches. If labourers were to join these clubs it would remove them from the " wet" clubs, which were far from being to their advan- tage. If such a society as lie had hiuted at were established, he believed it would be greatly to the benefit of the labourers everywhere and to the wellare of the conntry. THE ESSEX AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT STRATFORD. It is recorded how whea some second-class daudy wished to give a dinner-party lie requested Brummell to name aud invite the guests ; but on going over these they could not agree as to the exact number, the Beau counting up to nine only, while the other reached to ten. At length, however, the host solved the difficulty by pointing out that Brummell had omitted to include in the company the giver of the feast. " My good fellow," was the Beau's answer, " you don't mean to say that you are going to dine with us 1" Now it seems to us that the almost hopeless muddle — for muddle it stil! is — into which the Essex Society has drifted might be amended in something the same way. Let them by throwing open the whole show, and so getting quit of that terrible Book of Numbers, provide the material for an entertainment in which they will not presume to fake much share themselves. Aud in point of fact it has already nearly come to this. There are now but few show Shorthorn herds in the county, for Mr. Pigott has given over and ilr. Christie has been selling out ; all the best premiums for horses went out of the county, as they mostly did also for sheep and pigs ; the competition for the more local breeds or from the more local breeders, being pretty generally on the plan of a very limited company. In truth, with just an exception or so, the exhibition of the most famous breed of stock was supplied from without ; Oxford Prize, paraded as a blind- fold savage, now receiving no notice whatever in the champion class, where one of the judges held to l)ony- land Duke, a yearling of good quality, but with little more in his favour. However, the Duke was eventually placed third or highly commended in the class, about the best performance the Essex stock did during the day ; the winner turning up once more in Telemachus, who is wearing well and promising well again for the Royal meeting. Lord Exeter's bull must, indeed, be one of rare constitution, as he suffered terribly from foot-and-mouth disease in the summer of 1872, when he was on his side for some weeks, and shed all his hoofs. He won, of course, easily enough in the bull class, the judges dwelling for some time over the Essex yearling and The Earl of Warwickshire in their choice for second, as the Earl has lost his coat, and in other respects is a less " hkely" animal than ever. Telemachus, nevertheless, was beaten for the challenge cup by Mr. Kennard's yearling heifer, to which we have previously spoken as almost perfect ; singularly straight and true in her frame, with a good honest touch and plenty of breeding about her. Queen Mary rather lacks elegance in the "turn" of her neck, which threatens to grow too coarse for fine cow character. Still she beat not merely the champion bull Telemachus, but the rival beauties Vivandiere and Victoria Victrix, who here ran out their tie so far, and the crack yearling Lord Godolphin, showing very light and none the better for his recent travels about the country. As we intimated at Bristol, Lady Pigot's younger animals have not gone on well since last season, and Rapid Rhone and the Wythams made no great mark at Stratford ; the I 2 126 •THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. more sightly heifer Baroness Conyens now beating Rose of Wytham, as she should have done at Bristol, and also Blooming Bride. Amongst the family parties Telemachus and Sea Gull had nothing to beat but the blindfold Oxford Prize and Acacia, without it vvere Mr. Hope's Cherries ; but then Mr. Hope will not feed up his milking cows for show, and thus, of course, his entries scarcely attracted a glance from such a judge of beef as Mr, Clifton Robinson. There was a very short show of " Essex Shorthorns without pedigrees" — thorough Essex this — and in the general class of dairy cows old Milkmaid was the best of all, beating red Polls from Norfolk and Shorthorns from Essex, and a lot of quite beautiful little Brittauies. Milkmaid was, of course, tirst again in the Jersey cow class, with a very nice cow shown by Mr. Tower, beating the "Wray Queens and Beauties for second ; while Fan first, and Pretty Lass second, was again the return over the heifers, amongst which Lord Braybrooke showed a very clever one not in ])rice. It was altogether a very good entry of Jerseys, with Essex doing better here, even beyond Mr. Gilby ; and Mr. Simpson in defiance of some previous readings taking first and second with Crocus and Favourite in a large and good class of bulls of all ages, the entry running up to close upon twenty. " A good show of riding horses for Essex " is simply tantamount to a very bad one. If the show of nags was bad the management was worse, or rather there was no management at all ; but this is easily ac- counted for, as what is everybody's business is nobody's, and there was a very regiment of mounted officials contin- ually getting in each other's and everybody's way. Then the " ring " was too circular, and surrounded by a chain, of all the dangerous things in the world ; there was no telegraph board, while the prize cards were not nailed up for hours after the verdicts were given. The poor show of nags we think is in a measure due to the folly of only giving one prize in many of the classes, and the still greater folly of allowing the same horse to be entered in several other classes. For instance, there was nothing to prevent Masinissa, the Numidian Conqueror, from carry- ing off three prizes out of four had the judges believed in the old saying of " an ounce of blood is worth a pound of bone." As it was he was sent back to Hasketon loaded with spoil, as Mars, the God of War, was more vulnerable than Achilles, and though as handsome as paint, and by Marsyas, out of Necklace, the golden bay stood no more chance with the brown in the ring than the poor crippled Knight Templar, by Knight of Kars, half-brother to Stockwell, King Tom, and Rataplan ! But such is the lottery of breeding, that while the vital spark lingers in the poor cripple it is possible, though not probable, that it may fall in fruitful soil, and bring forth a fiery steed who may cause a consternation. Such was the case with Marsyas, the sire of Mars, who, shrunken with age and gone in the back, was all but put out of sight when we were last at Cobham ; but still to him it was de- creed to get George Frederick, and not his grand companions, two as handsome looking horses as eyes ever gazed on — the all but faultless Macaroni and the twelve thousand five hundred guineas Blair Athol. Masi- nissa has thickened, and as he is liked by the Essexites we look forward to seeing some Sophonisbas and Jemmy Thomsons in the ring, as he always reminds us of the poet's line in his tragedy on the loves of Masinissa and Sophouisba. O, Sophouisba ! Sophonisba, O ! and the wag in the gallery who sung out 0, Jemmy Thomson ! Jemmy Thomson, 0 ! The well-known Fireaway the 2nd was considered the best of a few useful roadsters, including Mr. Branwhite's Defiance, which beat him last year, Sir. J. Grout's The Squire, and Mr. Gedden's Great Gun. For the weight- carrying hunters it was any odds on the Banker, as Mr. Hayward's Paramour, a winner of several prizes, and one other were his ouly opponents. For hunting mares or geldings five years old, peculiar to Essex, there were only two entries for the £10 and £5, and the prizes witheld for vrant of merit. This is w hat the management might have expected, as five-year-old hunters represent so much money now, and it is not likely that owners will risk their horses catching cold, and go to the expense of sending them away from home with servants for half a week or more on the chance of winning such prizes. In a very poor class of light-weight hunting mares and geldings Gentility, of fair hunting form and action, beat King John, not much to look at, and v.ot at all like his sire King John, a horse from whom the late Mr. Blenkiron expected great things. Such is breea- ing. The four-year-old hunting mare Duchess is a brown of good form, which, after being ridden by Mr. Booth, appeared in the ring with foal at foot as the best hunting brood mare. Ladylike, a clever hack, with rather tutored action, in a class of fifteen beatfiveor six worthy of notice — viz., Mr. Krisby's Filbert, Mr. Smith's chesnut mare by Knight Templar, Mr. Grout's Kitty, and Mr. Gray's brown gelding. The natty little harness horse Eclipse, from Buck- ingham-gate, noted in the ling for his very elegant moving only played second to Sensation, a short-legged capital- going gig mare ; and again a fine showy and useful pair of browns from Mr. Gilbey beat him, as Eclipse's com- panion in harness was not considered his match, but an odd one. I hen, with Princess Polo, a nice goer, Mr. Frisby was again out of luck, being put behind Sir Thomas White's nicely-made cob. Among the ponies was a very little dun, a perfect blood-horse in miniature and au extraordinary goer, as we think, called Sir Tommy, but we could not catch his number. The agricultural horses made a better display, as the Suffolks mustered in strong numbers ; but they were out of luck, and in many instances were beaten by any- thing but imposing animals, with the main exception of Mr. Purser's grand mare Honest Lass and Mr. Statter's Cham- pion,manyround the ring saying they never saw Champion show better ; but we fear they did not take into con- sideration that he was not in tip-top society, and that his always superiors Honest Tom and Le Bon were well out of the way. With reminiscences of Sir Walter Scott and Young Lofty, we look for something grand, with power, a cheerful countenance, and an elastic step in a Clydesdale, which Mr. Sturgeon's horse has not, as he is but a sour-headed plain animal, with "plenty of hair" on his legs. Ashantee, again, is a good-limbed, useful horse ; but we could find in our own neighbourhood many a geldiug of much grander proportions in contractors' carts. Mr. C. Frost's four-year-old by Cupbearer, and the Ipswich Cup winner, is a well-made Suffolk, barringbe- ing tied in at the knees; whileMajor Garrett'soldhorsehad left several very promising ones on the ground, but a two- year-old with bone and action, out of a mare by Bar- thropp's Hero, will do more for the fame of Cupbearer than the Claimant. There were some nice two-year-olds, but the chesnuts had to succumb to a Grand Priuce, not of their breed. In a good class of cart mares, four years old and upwards, the chesnuts were again routed by the Bedford Honest Lass, the first two-year-old at Cardiff, the class including Mr. Lester's Royal Duchess, Mr. Bott's old mare, and Mr. Brierly's famous grey Sensation, which has much fallen off in form and action, but still a grand mare, as she always will be, for even her skeleton would be a prize to any lover of the horse. Then there were Mr. Wolton's Diamond and Princess, Mr. Green's Smart, Mr. THE FAEMBR'S MAGAZINE. 127 Lambert's bay by Houest Tom, and Mr. Tomlinsou's Smiler from Derby. There were a couple of good two- year-old fillies, the winner being by Cupbearer. A hand- some mare headed the class under four years old, and a good-looking Clydesdale the mares with foals, backed by Mr. Coulsou's upstanding Violet and Mr. Green's Blossom ; while a neat active little cart-mare of Mr. 1 ourage's — a breed getting scarcer every day — had a foal by the thoroughbred Kuight Templar. There were a couple of good geldings, several capital pairs, and one very showy team of four. It will be thus seen that the four-year-old filly Honest Lass, by Honest Tom, was without the slight- est question — for everybody had so settled it before Mr. Purser's filly entered the ring — declared to be the best of all ; as she also eventually was at Ipswich the other day, although two Suffolk fanciers had just previously contrived to put her out of her class, as not being the sort of animal fit for Suffolk. It is, however, going a long way to assume that had Honest Lass been a chesnut instead of a bay slie would not have been considered just the sort for Suffolk. An old saying declares that a good horse cannot be of a bad colour, but this would the rather now appear to run, at least down Eastwards, that a good horse can only be of one colour. And what is this colour test worth even in a Suffolk ? Next to nothing. There was a grey exhibited at Stratford, out of a grey mare, which when put to a chesnut stallion will or has thrown chesnut stock which have been duly exhibited as pure Suffolks ? Of course Honest Lass now beat the smart filly put above her at Ipswich, and the joke of the day was Messrs. Barthropp's and Badham's award, to be knowu hereafter as " the Judg- ment of Solomons." But this is not the first time that Honest Lass has had to encounter such Solomons, as afjer winning at a Royal meeting, she was bodily turned out of the ring at Leicester, in company with a class duly recorded as possessing no mciU ! Mr. Colman's Southdowns to our thinking never showed so well ; there was more breed and style about them, and apparently less desire to manufacture a South- down by feeding and crossing for size. The winning shearling was a smart neat sheep, and two or three really pretty ewes might have been picked out of the prize pen. With His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales, Mr. Gor- ringe, and others here in competition, we may look to something like a battle Royal amongst the Norfolk flocks at Bedford. There were one or two exhibitors of Suffolk blackfaces, and one exhibitor of Oxfords ,or Shropshires, but in a better entry of longwools, Leicesters, Lincolns, or Cots wolds, the county had little or no concern. Mr. Griggs in the county has still some capital hardy Berkshires. Vet the chief winner of pig premiums was from without, Mr. Royds being everywhere prominent, as in one class he substituted a small black sow bred by Lord Portsmouth for one entered as bred by Mr. Sexton, although some of the other firsts were direct from Wher- stead. The Wheelers and Duckerings were also occa- sionally successful, but with one premium only in a class they had more commonly to be content with commenda- tions. If the Committee had intended the luncheon to be a failure they could not have contrived this more effectually than by putting the price of " the cold collation" at five shillings a head ; the more especially as some of us who had rashly paid so much found subsequently to our sor- row that a slice of beef or the wing of a chicken might have been had in another place at just half the money. As it was the public would not give the fee even to look at a live Lord Mayor, and the large tent was very sparsely furnished with guests. However, those who did take tickets had plenty of elbow room and came and went just when they pleased, paying the least possible heed to a gentleman who appeared to be proposing toasts and making speeches. It will, indeed, be noticed, that we have had still to dwell on the mismanagement of this Society, as some of our contemporaries are at length getting weary of the difficulties which they have to en- counter in undertaking such an affair. The Agricultural Gazette becomes thus confounded : " In spite of un- necessary perplexities, caused by having county classes and classes open to the whole kingdom, and allowing the Essex cattle to compete in both, so that one animal might be (and sometimes was), if not ' like Cerberus, three gentlemen at once,' certainly representing three entries at once — i.e., one in the county class, one in the general class, and one in the class for a group of animals (bull, cow, and offspring, or best three yearlings) — in spite of this bewilderment, and that caused by putting all the classes in line, putting an open class, for example, like the meat in a sandwich, between two home-bred ones, still the exhibition was very interesting — i.e., when one had got over the puzzle of finding prize-cards more freely distributed among the more ordinary looking than among the choicer speci- mens." Again, even such an optimist as the agricultu- ral authority of jT//*? f/ frost (Cupbeitier). One year-old entire colt, foaled in 1873. — First prize, Lieut." Colonel F. M. Wilson, Slowlangtoft Hall (Monarch) ; secoad, S. Robinson, Braraford Tye (Steam's Boxer). Highly com- meuded : C. Frost (Cupbearer 2nd) ; W. Turner, Waldriog- field (Grout's Emperor). Reserve and highly commended : A. Crackuell, Tliornhara, Eye (Cupbearer) ; E. Hodgson, Chars&eld (Bismarck). mares and foals. Mare with foal at foot. — First prize, H. Wolton, JNewbourne Hall (Pride) ; second, G. A. Goulson, The Hay, Fingringhoe (Violet). Reserve and highly commended : R. Makens, Ring- siiall. Foal, foaled in 187i. — First prize, A. Cracknell (Spelman's Ploughboy) ; second, S. Wolton (Chillesford Duke). Reserve and higiily commended : C. Frost (Cupbearer Sod). Gast raare. — First prize, D. A. Green, East Donyland, Col- chester (Smart) ; second, H. Wolton (Diamond) ; Reserve : Lieut.-Colonel F. M. Wilson. Bay cart mare, special cup awarded by the Judges on the ground that the animal was of superior merit for general pur- poses, but was not purely an agricultural raare. — Extra prize, H. Purser, Willington Manor, Bedford (Honest Lass). FILLIES. Three-year-old filly, foaled m 1871. — First prize, W. Cross, Ivy Cottage, Prating, Colchester (Kathleen) : second, I. Rist, Brantham (Blossom). Reserve and highly coimnended : J. Toller. Two-year-old filly, foaled in 1873.— First prize, M. Biddell (Jewel) ; second, C. Frost. Higlily commended : D. A, Green. Commended : I. Rist. Reserve : W. Wilson, Bayl- ham. Year-old cart filly, foaled in 1873, — First prize, J. Skeet, Rushmere, Ipswich (Wilson's Bismarck) ; second, H. Purser (Grand Duchess, the Czar). For the best filly in the above three classes. — Special prize, VV. Cross. For the best team of four cart horses, either mares or geldings, or mixed, of any breed, to be exhibited in harness or not, at the option of the exhibitor. — Special prize, H. Wolton. Pair of plough horses, mares, or geldings, or mixed. — Special prize, H. Wolton (Captain and Brag). RIDING AND COACHING HORSES. Tiioroughbred Stallion for hunting purposes, having served uot less than ten mares in the county. — First prize, Colonel F. Barlow, Hasketon (Massanissa) ; second. Col. ¥. Barlow (Citadel). Stallion for coaching purposes, having served not less than ten mares in the county. — First prize, J. Grout, Woodbridge (Vanguard). Roadster stallion, having served not less than ten mares in the county. — First prize, J. Grout (Quicksilver) ; 2ud J. Grout (^oung Harkaway). For best stallion in the above three classes. — Special prize, Lieut-Col. F. Barlow's (Massanissa). For best match pair of geldings or raares, for carriage purposes, not less than 14'.2 hands. — Special prize, J. Grout, Ijay mares. , Hunting mare, with foal at foot. — First prize, J. Grout. (Myrtte) ; second. Rev. A. Bond, Freston Rectory, Ipswich Reserve : H. Wolton, Newbourne Hall. Hackney mare, with foal at foot. —First prize, H. Wolton (Wood Nymph) ; second, E. Prior, Bury St. Edmund's. Reserve: J. tJ. C.ok, Ashtieid-cura-Thorpe. Hunting foal, bred in the county, or by exhibitor. — Prize, J. R. 'Wood, iVielton Hall, Woodbridge. Reserve : J. Grout. Roadster foal, bred in the county, or by the exhibitor. — Prize, E. Prior, Bury St. Edmund's. Reserve : H. Wolton. For tlie best foal, by either of bis ridiug stallions. — Specja} prize, H, Woltou. For the best foal by either of the Hasketon stallions,^ Spceial prize, J, Humphreys, Ipswich. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 1^ Weight-carrying hunting mare or gelding, not less than five years old, equal to carry not less than 14 stone. — First pri/.e, C. C. llayward, Southill, Biggleswade, Bedfordshire (Para- mour) ; second, S. A. Goodwyn, I.eiston Hall (The Lancer). Reserve: F. G. Freeman, Henhaiii, Wangford (Perfection). Four-year-old weight-carrying hunting mare or gelding, equal to carrying not less than li stone. — First prize, Lieut- Col. F. Barlow (Gornishman), also special prize as tlie best hunter in the yard ; second, C. C. Hayward (Richelieu). Ke- serve : G. M. Sexton, Wherstead Hall, Ips.vicli (The Baron). Weight-carrying hunting mare or gelding, three years old, having been bred in the county or by the exhibitor, aud equal to carrying not less than 14 slone. — First prize, R. Garrett (mare); second, G. M. Sexton (gelding). Reserve: Lieut- Col. Barlow (gelding). Weigiit-carrying hunting mare or gelding, two years old, having been bred in the county or by the exiiibitor, aud equal to carrying not less than 14 stone. — First prize, \V. P. T. Phillips, The Grange, Meltou (Fencing Lass) ; second, Lieut. Col. F. Barlow (Courage). Commended: R. Garret (gelding). Liglit- weight hunting mare or gelding. — Special prize, Lieut-Col. F. Barlow, Hasketon. Reserve and commended : W. Harvey, Timworth. RIDERS AND HACKNEYS. Riding mare or gelding, not under 15 hands liigh. — First prize, R. Garrett (roan riding mare). Reserve: J. Grout (Gay Lad). Hackney mare or gelding, not under 14 hands high and not exceeding 15 hands. — First prize, J. Grout, (Kitty). Three-year-old hackney mare or (jeldiug, bred in the county or by the exhibitor. — Prize, J. Toller, Blaxliall. Reserve : Rev. A. Bond, Freston Rectory, Ipswich. Two-year-old hackney mare or gelding, bred in tlie county or by the exhibitor. — First prize, G. Bond, The Rookery, Cretinghara. Reserve and commended : J. Smith, Hasketon. The best hackney mare or gelding, of not less than 14 hands high, nor more than 15-2 hands liigh, to be exiiibitediu single harness. — Special prize, J. Grout, Woodbridge (Alice). Reserve : J. A. Ransome, Ipswich. For the best weight-carryinK cob, mare, or geldiug, carry- ing (while being judged) at least 15 stones, saddle and bridle included, and not less than 1-5.3 hands nor more than 14.3 hands high. — Special Prize, R. C. Cooke, Livermore. Re- serve and commended: M. Page, Hollesley. Commended: J. Grout, Woodbridge (Alice). POMES. Pony, not under 13 hands high, and not exceeding 14 hands. Prize, R. C. Cooke. For the pony showing the finest action in single or double harness. — Special prize, J. A. Ransome (Rory O'More). Highly commended: R. Capon, Denningtou (Bess). For the best match pair of ponies under 14 hands high — Special prize, J. A. Rinsome (Rory O'JMoore) and (Kate Kearnay). For the best match pair of ponies under 13 hands high. — Special prize, Mrs. Ogilvie, Sizewell House, Leiston (Harle- quin) and (Columbine). For the hunter jumping the best the first day of the show. — Special prize, J. Grout, Woodbridge (Irish Lassie). For tiie hunter jumping best: tried over hurdles, a bank and water jump, on the second day of show. — Special prize, cup, Duke of Hamilton, Eastou Park. CATTLE. Suffolk or Norfolk red polled bull, not under two years old. —First prize, J. J. Coliuan, M.P., Norwich (Powell) ; second, H. Birkbeck, Stoke Holy Cross, Norwich (Young Duke), Commended : M. Biddell, Playford (Big Playford). Suifolk or Norfolk red polled bull, under two years old.— ■ First Prize, J. J. Coleman, M.P., Norwich (Royal Duke); second, R. E. Loft, Troston, Bury St. Edmund's (Honest Tom). Commended: H. Birbeck, Stoke Holy Cross, Norwich (Suffolk). Suffolk or Norfolk red polled hull calf, not exceeding one year old. — First prize, J. J. Colraan (Baron Easton). Suffolk or Norfolk red polled cow in milk or in calf. — First prize, R. E.Lofft, Troston, Bury St. Edmund's (Minue) ; second, B. Brown, Thursford (Countess). Under three-years-old Suffolk or Norfolk red polled heifer jn milk or in calf. — First priz«, B. Brown, Thui'sford (Nonpa- riel) ; second, H. Birbeck, Stoke tjoly Crqss, Nurwieli (Wave). Conimended: J. J. Coleman, M.P., Norwich (Rosabelle). Under two-year-old Suffolk or Norfolk red polled heifer. — First prize, G. Gooderham, Monewden (Coral). Shorthorn bull, not under two years old. — First prize, N. Catchpole, Bramford (Oxford Prize) ; second, J. Wortley, Swafield, Walshara (Cap*aMi Hopeful). Commended: R. H. Crabb, Baddow Place, 0 lelmsford (Baddow Duke of Geneva). Shorthorn bull, under two years old. — Firstprize.D. A. Green, East Donylaud, Colchester (Donyland Duke) ; second, R. H. Crabb (Claro's Rose 2nd). Commended: N. Catchpole (Thiers). Shorthorn bull-calf, not exceeding one-year-old. — Prize, T. Rose, Melton Magna (Bright Knight). Highly commended: N. Catchpole (The Shah). Shorthorn cow, in milk or in calf.— First prize, N. Catch- pole (Accacia) ; second, T. Jennings, Phantom House, New- market (Bracelet). Commended: N. Catchpole (Queea Anne). Shorthorn heifer, under three years old, in milk or in calf. — First prize, J. R.Chaplin, Ridgewell,Halstead (Cinnamon) ; second, N. Catchpole (Romford Rose). Highly commended: N. Catchpole. Shorthorn heifer, under two years old. — First prize, D. A. Green ; second, R. H. Crabb. Highly commended : N. Catclipole ; R. H. Crabb; J. R. Chaplin (Lady Pigot). Bull of any pure breed, not being red polled, Suffolk, or Norfolk, or Shorthorn. — Prize, R. M. Jary, Underwood Hall, Westley (The Shah). Cow or heifer of the Channel Islands breed, if over two years old, in milk or in calf. — First prize, Lieut.-Colonel F. M. Wilson; second. Marquis of Bristol. Commended: I. Rist. Best cow or heifer in the yard, bred by a tenant-farmer in the county of Suffolk. — Special prize, N. Catchpole (Romford Rose). SHEEP. Suffolk tup, of any age. — Prize, J. M. Green, Stradishall, Newmarket. Highly commended : R. Woodgate, Great Wald- ingfield, Sudbury. Shearling Suffolk tup. — First prize, J. M. Green ; second, W. S. Garner, Moulton, Newmarket. Suffolk lamb tup.— Prize, R. Woodgate. Pen of five Suffolk shearling ewes. — First prize, R. Wood- gate ; second, W. S. Gardner. Highly commended: R. Garrett. Short-woolled tup, of any pure breed (not being Suffolk), of any age. — Prize, Marquis of Bristol (Southdown). Highly commended : G. Cooke, Horseheath Park Linton. Com- mended : J. J. Colman, M.P., Norwich (Southdown) ; J. Giblin, Bardfield, Braintree. Sliearling short-woolled tup of any pure breed, not being Suffolk, of any age. — First prize, Mr. Cooke; second, J. J. Colman, M.P. (Southdown). Commended : Mr. Cooke ; J . Giblin. Pen of five short-woolled shearling ewes, of any pure breed, not being Suffolk.— First prize, J. J. Colman, M.P. (South- down); second, Mr. Cooke. Long-woolled tup of any pure breed, of any age. — Prize, J. Giblin (Cotswold three-shear tup). Shearling long-woolled tup, of any pure breed. — First prize, J. Wheeler and Sons (Shearling Cotswold ram) ; second, J. Giblin (shearling Cotswold tup). Best ram in the yard. — Special prize, the Marquis of Bristol. Pen of ten ewes of any age or breed, which have had Iambs this year. — Prize, A. F. Nicholson, Ipswich (Hampshire Down). Ten shearling ewes of any breed. — Prize, J. A. Hempsou, Erwarton Hall (Southdown). Ten ewe lambs of any breed. — Prize, J. J. Colman, M.P. (Southdown). Highly commended : A. Ogilvie, Sizewell House, Leiston. Reserve : R. Woodgate. Best p-m of ewes in the yard. — Special prize, J. J. Colman, M.P. PIGS. Boar of the black breed, not under one-year-old. — First prize, R. B. Duckering, iNorthorpe, Kirtqa Lindsey ; second, J, Wheeler aud Sons, 134 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. Boar of the black breed, under oue-year-old. — First prize, G. M. Sexton, "Wherstead Hall, Ipswich ; second. Lord Kendle- sham, M.P. Sow and pigs of the black breed (the pigs not to exceed ten weeks old). — Prize, G. M. Sexton. Breeding sow of the black breed. — First prize, J. Wheeler and Sous ; second, G. JNI. Sextou. Keserve : U. E. Uuckering. Pen of three young sows, of the black breed, pigged since November 1st. — First prize, G. M. Sextou ; second, T. Rose, Melton Magna, AVymondhara. Boar of the white breed, not under one-year-old. — First prize and special prize, lor the best boar in the yard, G. M. Sexton ; second. Lord llendlesham. Boar of white breed, under one-year-old. — First prize, J. Dose, Hambrook House, near Bristol ; second. Lord Eendle- sliaui. Special prize, G. M. Sextou. Sow and pigs of the white breed (the pigs not to exceed ten weeks old). — Prize, G. M Sextou. Breeding sow of the white breed. — First prize, E.. E. Duckering ; second, J. Dove. Pen of three young sows of the white breed, pigged since November 1st. — First prize, Lord Rendlesham, M.P. ; second, R. E. Duckering. The following implement makers had stands on the ground: Rausoraes, Sims, and Head, Orwell Works, Ipswich ; E. R. and F. Turner, St. Peter's Iron Works, Ipswich ; R. Garrett a.id Sons, Leiston Works, Satfulk ; Woods, Cock- sedge, and Co., Stowmarket ; Packard and Co., Ipswich ; James, Sons, and Smyth, Peaseuliall ; J. K. King, Coggeshall, Essex ; Rands and Jeckell, Ipswich ; F. Beaumont, Ipswich ; Bennett and Botwood, Ipswich ; Whight and Mann, Gipping Works, Ipswich ; C. Taylor, Ipswich ; J. T. Scrivener, Ipswich ; Scrivener, Gill, and Co., Ipswich and London ; G. Busse and Co. ; Ohlendortf and Co. ; Bell and Co. ; G. Gilders ; Burgess and Key ; R. Boby ; Catchpool and Stan- nard ; W. Bear ; W. Tinsley ; C. Burrell ; J. T. Markall ; Murton and Turner; Whitmore and Binyon ; Page and Gir- ling. At the President's dinner Lord Waveney returned thanks for the Vice-Presidents, aud congratulated the Society on the remarkable success of the show of thsit day, and expressed his gratification to fiud that there was an improvement in the manner in which the horses were brought to the ring. He liad previously expressed a hope that the horses might be shown so that tiiey could see a little more of the skeleton, and a little less of tiie skill of the horse keeper. He thought the young animals exhibited that day h*d sliown that there was now a tendency to work out the faults of the horses. He had never seen horses that more inspired him with hopes than the two-year-old class that day. Mr. Basil Sparkow, in returning thanks for the judges, said he considered the show of hunters had been very good. Oue of the horses he had got upon was such a one as he should have liked to put into his own stables, for lie was one of the few big horses that could gailop. There were, he could say from his own experience, very lew \\ eight-carriers that were worth anything, aud he could prove that in the mud of the Essex brooks. He thought there was a prospect of tiie British farmer being better horded than he had been, that in future a good horse would not be beyond the means of the Suffolk farmer, and if he did not want them tliat the land- lord would be willing to give a good price for them. Capt. BAPaiiuorp also responded for the judges, aud alluded to a difficulty which had arisen in judging class 7 that day. A bay mare, a very good animal, was exhibited in that class. His friend, Mr. Thompsou, and himself did not quite agree as to the merits of this mare and a chesuut mare wliich received the prize. He (Capt. Barthropp) felt tliat the other was not the animal to encourage in tliis county, and a refeiee was called in. Mr. Badham was called in, and he coincided in his (Capt. Barthropp's) opinion, and the prize went to the chesnut, aud the bay mare was considered not the sort of animal for Suffolk. Then the question arose whether this mare was eligible for the special prize for the best cart mare in classes 5 and 7 ? As he (Capt. Barthropp) understood it the prize was given for the be^t animal for agricultural pur- poses, and he certainly thought she ought not to go into the ring ; but it was decided by the stewards by a majority of one, that the bay mare was eligible to compete, she went into the ring, and his friend Thompson and himself were again at issue. They both retired from the contest, aud left the matter to two other gertlenien — one of whom had been a judge of cattle, and the other of sheep — who decided that the bay mare should have the prize. The decision might be right, or it might be wrong, only he wished the explanation to be known, because it seemed curious that the mare should have beeu decided not to have been eligible to compete, and that they should turn about in halt-au-hour and give her the best prize in the yard. He would luUy admit tlie merits of the mare for dray purposes, but he did not consider that she was the best for agricultural purposes in Suffolk. The show of agri- cultural horses had beeu most successful. There were 12 or 13 animals in the two-year old class, and the fact that the Veterinary Inspector had said that he did not see a single side bone, spoke volumes in favour of the improvement of the Suffolk horses, who were said, by some enemies of the breed, to have had bad feet. He could only say with respect to other breeds that about three weeks ago he was acting as judge at the Royal Cornwall Show, and in the first class of horses there was not a single sound horse ; they ali had side bone or very bad sand cracks. Mr. Thompson also responded, and carried the bay raare story) a little further. She was a Bedfordshire mare exhi- bited among the Suffolks. In looking over his judges' book lie found that the prize was to be awarded to the best cart mare. As to being fitted for agricultural purposes, he would like to know what agricultural work that mare could not do ? He wanted to know why that animal, which could do its work in Lincolnshire or Cambridgeshire, could not do it in Suffolk ? He held strongly for that mare for the simple reason that he thought she was one of the best four-year-old mares he ever saw. He would ask Mr. Badham a simple question, whether that mare ought to be disqualified merely for colour or for the hair on her legs ? She was said to be a mare for dray pur- poses, and as he found by the judges' book that the prizes were for cart horses, why should she not have the prize ? Mr. H. BiDDELL said a matter which had been talked of very much was the union of the three counties for the for- mation of one Society, so as to make one great East of England Show. They would get a very great show perhaps, but he should like to ask what they would get there that they had not had at Ipswich that day ? If they wanted a bigger show, they had quite enough for anyone to look at in the two days. If they wanted more money, he would say that they had offered enough money to collect some of the best classes of animals he had ever seen. The Bath and West of England Society having recently enlarged the area of its operations, the County Associations within that area had started up into activity, and had never been more prosperous than now. THE SHORTHORN HERD BOOK. — Messrs. Lythall and Clarke, the auctioaeers of Birmingham, were ready to give Mr. StrafFord his price, £5,000, for this work, wliich, however, as will be seen, has now beeu taken up by a Company. THE WATERCO.MBE RAMS.— Mr. J. T. Ensor, of Dorchester, brought to the hammer for sale and and letting 135 rams, belonging to the flock of Mr. T. Chap- man Saunders. The two-tooth rams were first submitted, there being 70 lots of these. They realised in all 312^ gs. and 392 gs. Lot 35, a superior animal, made 36 gs., while lot 46 brought 30 gs., lot 60 33 gs., and lot 6-i 23 gs. Fifty- two rams (four-tooth) were let at prices varying from 5 gs. to 31 gs., the whole of the lots bringing 187i gs. and 17H gs. Of thee, lot 99, a very superior animal, was let at 27 gs., 22 gs. being given for the letting of lot 80, 31 gs. lot 95, and 21 gs. lot 105. Sixteen six-tooth (mostly) were sold at from 5 gs. to 13| gs., the whole bringing 47| gs. and 63J gs. Twenty others were let at from 5 gs. to 9 gs., the whole making 124 gs. The grand total of the sale and letting was 1,298^ gs., or an average of £10 Is. lid. O^HE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 135 THIRSK AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. At this show the entries were 50 in excess of last year, the increase being iu the slieep aud pig classes, while the hors3s were up to about the usual standard ol this meeting. P R I Z E - L I S T. CAT T L E. SHOllTHORNS. Bull two years old aud upwards. — First prize, G. Yates. Studley, Ripon ; second, I. Garbutt, Bragg House, Farndale, Kirbyrnoorside. Bull above one year and under two years old. — First prize, Rev. W. Vrest, Ampleforth College ; second, C. Mc C. Swar- breck, Sowerby. Bull calf under twelve months old. — First prize, H. Clay, Northallerton ; second, J. Coates, Hartshead Moor. Cow or heifer in-cali or milk, three years old and upwards. — First and second prizes, and cup. — T. H. Hutchinson, ilanur House, Catterick. Cow or heifer under three years old. — First prize, T. H, Hutchinson ; second, T. Strickland. Heifer one year old and under two. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson ; second, T. Strickland. Heifer calf under twelve months old. — First prize, Major StapyltoD, Myton-hall ; second, J. T. Robinson, Topciiffe. CATTLE OF AXY BREED OR CROSS. Cow for dairy purposes. — First prize, G. K. Hariand, Northallerton ; second, T. Strickland Cow, the property of a cottager. — First prize, T. Barnett, Thormanby ; second, G. Yates, Thirsk. Three dairy cows in calf or milk, tlie property of a tenant- farmer. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson, Catterick ; second, C. Mc. C. Swarbeck, Sowerby; third, H. Pickersgill, Top- ciiffe. SHEEP. LEICESTER OK LONOWOOL. Ram, one shear. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson, Catterick ; second, W. Coverdale, Uelmsley. Ram, aged. — First prize, W. Coverdale ; second, T. H. Hutchinson. Highly commended ; C. and W. Dovener, Bedale, and T. H. Hutchinson. Three gimmer shearlings. — First and second prizes, T. H. Hutchinson. Commended : R. Tarbotton, Cawton, Gilling, and W. K. Pickering, Gilling. Pen of three ewes having suckled lambs in 1374. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson ; second, W. Coverdale. (Limited to the i)istrict). Ram, one shear. — First prize, C. and W. Dovener; second, F. Heugh, Northallerton. Ram, aged. — First prize, R. Tarbotton ; second, F. Heugh. Commended : C. and W. Dovener. Three gimmer shearlii.gs. — First prize, W. K. Pickering, Gilling ; second, R. Tarbotton, Cawton. Three ewes having suckled lambs in IST-t. — First prize, AV. Hall, Thirsk ; second, C. and W. Dovener, Bedale. Half-bred sheep, limited to the district. — First prize, W. Dale, Topciiffe Park ; second, C. Watson, Sowerby. Three ewes having suckled lambs in 187^. — Prize, J. Greaves, Clotherholme, Ripon. PIGS. Boar, large breed — Prize, W. Lister, Armley. Boar, small breed. — First prize, G. Sedgwick, York ; second, D. Sanderson, Richmond. Boar of the black or Berkshire breed. — Prize, W. Holmes, York. Boar of any other breed. — First prize, G. Sedgwick ; second, — Grahaaa, Leeds. Sow of the large breed, in pig or milk. — First prize, — Graham ; second, W. Lister. Sow of the small breed, in pig or milk. — First prize, D. Sanderson, Moulton-hall ; second, G. Sedgwick, York. Sow of the black or Berkshire breed.— Prize, W. Holmes, York. Sow of any other breed, not qualified to compete in classes 35, 26, and 27 — First prize, W. Lister, Armley, Leeds ; second, F. Waller, High Coniscliff, Darlingtou, (Limited to the District). Pig, the property of a cottager whose annual rental does not exceed £8.— First prize, J. Eden, Thirsk ; second, G. Horner, Thirsk. Commended : J. Appleton, Thirsk. Highly com- mended : W. Jackson, Bedale. G. Horn°r^ being disqualified, prize given to W. Jack.son. HORSES. Thoroughbred stallion for getting hunters. — First prize, B. Fislibiirn, Ainderby Steeple ; seeond, W. Feaster, Cock Moor- hall, York. Commended : J. Gowland, Ripon. Stallion for getting agricultural horses, to travel in the district the following year. — First prize, W. Robson, Old Malton ; second, Jas. F. Crowther, Mirfield. Brood mare for breeding coach horses with foal at foot. — First prize, W. L. Robinson, Thormanby-liall ; second, R. Mothersill, Northallerton. Mare for breeding weight-carrying hunters, with foal at foot. — First prize, J. T. Robinson, Topcliff ; second, M. Wilkin- son, North Kilviogton. Brood mare for breeding roadsters, witji foal at foot. — First prize, Wm. F. Filter, South Preston ; second, C. Lancaster, Northallerton. Mare for breeding agricultural horses, with foal at foot. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson, Catterick ; second, J. Morton, Skipton-on-Swale. HUNTERS. Yearling gelding for the field. — Prize, 11. Crossley, Masham. Yearling filly for the field. — First prize, L. Manfield, Barugh ; second, R. Kirby, Northallerton. Two-year-old gelding for the field. — First prize, G. M. Loraas, Dishforth ; second, J. Leng, lloughton-le-side. Two-year-old filly for the field. — First prize, R. Garbutt, Ampleforth; second, J. T. Robinson, Topciiffe. Three-year-old gelding for the field. — First prize, J. B. Booth, Catterick ; second, G. Lancaster, Northallerton. Three-year-old filly for the field. — First prize, G. K. Har- iand, Northallerton ; second, C. Lancaster, Northallerton. Hunting gelding or mare, four years old. — First prize, T. H. Ilutclunson, Catterick; second, C.Rose, Malton. Hunting gelding or mare, jive years old and upwards, to be ridden in the ring. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson, Catterick ; second, J. C. Bilton, Hutton's Ambo. Hunting gelding or mare, seven years old or upwards, to be ridden in the ring. — Prize, B. Nicholson, Garforth. COACHING. Yearling gelding. — Prize, H. Pettinger, Easingwold. Two-year-old gelding. — First priz",, G. Meynell, Bedale ; second, R. D. Batty, Easingwold. Two-year-old filly. — First prize, J. Goodrick, Skiptou Bridge ; second, W. Hardwick, Northallerton. Three-year-old gelding for coaching. — First prize, T. Plummer, Easingwold ; second, H. Pettinger, Easingwold. Three-year-old filly for coaching. — Prize, J. Burton, Tliirsk. ROADSTERS. Two-year-old gelding for the road. — First prize, J. Rountree, Leyburn ; second, T. Heugh, Northallerton. Two-year-old filly for the road. — First prize, Hon. G. E. Laecelles, Sion Hill ; second, T. Carter, Thirsk. Three-year-old gelding for the road. — First prize, R. Kirby, Northallerton ; second, W. Wray, York. Three-year-old filly for the road. — First prize, Jas. Cook, York ; second, G. WetheriH, Thirsk. Highly commended : Robt. Farnhill, Batley. HACKNEYS. Gentleman's hackney, of any sex, not exceeding five years old, and not exceeding 151i. 2in. in height, to be ridden in the ring. — First prize, T. Dales, Kearby, near Wetherby ; second, T. G. Mallory, Great llabton, Pickering. Highly commended: Earl Cathcart, Thornton-le-Street. AGRICULTURAL HORSES. Yearling gelding or filly. — First prize, Mrs. Kitching and Sons, Whorlton ; second, W. Thrackrey, Borrowby. Two-year-old gelding. — First prize, J. Morton, Thirsk; second, R. Bosomwortii, Easingwold. Two-year-old filly. — First prize, W. Wilkinson, South Kil- vington ; second, W. Appleton, Thirsk. 136 THE FARMER*S MAGAJ^.TNE. Threc-jrar-old geldiug'.—Fir^t prize, J. Sitiitli, llnmbiirton, ] Boroughbrige ; second, J. Pt-irsoii, .♦.ireyholnip, Nortliallerton. Three-jear-old filly. — First prize, J. Chapinan, Tliorp Hill, York ; second, T. F. Iraeson, Eldmire-hill, Tliirsk. Gelding or mare four years old and upwards. — First and second prizes, R. Saunders, VVesibrook, Darlington. Com- mended : J. F. Crowther, Knowl Grove, Mirfield. Jumper. — First prize, T. Peacock, Hill-house, Bedale ; second, J. Welburn, Scackletou Grange, Hovingham. Pony not exceeding 14 hands in height, any age or sex. — First prize, T. Mitchell, Bowling-park, Bradford ; second, Mc C. Swarbreck, Sowerby. Highly commended : VV. Howe, BouJgate, Darlington ; and W. Johnson, Mile-house, Thirsk. EXTRA STOCK. Horses. — Prize £1 each, Tom Strickland (Thirsk Junction), three gilt pigs ; C.Nicholson (Melmerby, Thirsk), ewe and four lambs ; and W. Hall (Thirsk), Alderney cow. B UTTER. Four rolls of butter. — First prize, J. Arrowsmith, South Kilvington ; second, Mr. Abbey, Crimpie; third, Miss Els- worth, Plompton. Commended : J. Stevenson, Crosby. THORNE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. The entries were 1,264., or an increase over those of the previous show of 150. The agricultural and draught horses were superior to those previously exhibited, but the hunters were not very good. There was a fair show of cattle, a better class of animals being displayed than at last meeting. The sheep penned were principally Lincolns, and on the whole a moderate lot. PaiZE LIST. JUDGES.— Dratigiit Horses : T. Reed, Upton, Hull ; J. Wressell, Crow Grange, Beeford ; J. Smith, Braytou, Selby. Hunters AND N.vos ; E. Godfrey, Thealby Hall, Brigg ; T. Sinitli, Gringley-on the-Hill ; W. H. Clark, Hook House, Howden. Cattle, Sheep, and Pigs : T. Dodds, Mount Pleasant, Wakefield ; J. Rowley, Norton Priory, Askern ; E. Abraham, Barnetby-le-Wold, Ulceby. Butter AND Eggs : T. Tasker, Moorgate-grove, Rotherhara. HORSES. Agricultural mare and foal. — First prize, E. Coalman, Levels ; second, F. T. Turner, Armthorpe. Hunter mare and foal. — First prize, H. W. Godfrey, Levels, Thome ; E. Fearnside, Wakefield. Carriage mare and foal. — First prize, J. Reader, Holme ; second, M. Askren, Levels. Roadster mare and foal. — Fiist prize, T. E. Morrell, Rotherhara ; second, £. Belton, Tadworth. Agricultural or draught, yearling colt or filly. — First priie, F. T. Turner, Aimthorpe ; second, J. F. Crowther, Mirfield. Two-year-old gelding or filly. — First prize, J . T. Purvis, Gainsbro' ; second, N. England, Fishlake. Three-year-old gelding or filly. — First and second prizes, VV. Bramley, Amcotts. Pair of draught horses, within twenty miles of Thome. — First prize, G. Wood, Doncaster ; second, T. J. Brown. Pair of draught horses. — First prize, G. Bletcher, Levels ; second, J. F. Crowther. Gelding or mare, any age. — First prize, M. Askren, Levels ; second, W. Brockton, Tudworth. Hunters, yearling colt or filly. — First prize, J. Furnis, Crowie Wharf ; second, R. J. Winder, juu., Newton. Two-year-old gelding or filly.— First prize, M. Askren, Levels; second, T. Everett, Laughton. Three-year-old gelding or filly. — First prize, A. J. Brown, North Elmsall Hall ; second, M. Askren, Levels. Gelding or mare, any age. — Prize, A. J. Brown. Carriage yearling colt or filly. — First prize, J. Waite, Fish- lake ; second, W. Gray, Thorne. Two-year-old gelding or filly. — First prize, T. E. Morrell ; second, C. W. Darley, Thome. Gelding or mare, any age. — First prize, G. Goody, Thorne ; second, J. Benson, Saudtoft. Roadsters, yearling colt or filly. — H. W. Godfrey, Bank House ; second, M. Askren. Two-year-old gelding or filly. — First prize, R. Chapman, Campsall ; second, W. H. Brown, Beltoft. Three-year-old gelding or filly.— F'irst prize, W.Stephenson, Cottingham ; second, R. Farnhill, Batley. Gelding or mare, any age. — First prize, J. Robinson ; second, W. Sadler, Leeds. Weight-carrying cob. — First prize, J. Benson ; second, W. Sadler. Lady's hackney .—First prize, F. C. Matthews, Driffield ; second, J. Reader. Pony, not exceeding 14 hands. — First prize, W. H. Black man ; second, T. Mitchell, Bradford. Pony, not exceeding li hands. — F'irst prize. Miss A. M. Godfrey, Levels ; second, R. Widdop, Snaith. Yearling foal by " Blazeaway." — Special prize, H. W. Godfrey. CATTLE. Bull, any age. — First prize, J. H. Rockett, Goole ; second, S. Barker. Bull, not exceeding two years old. — First prize, J. Stain- forth, Sheffield Park ; second, J. F. Watson, Crowie Wharf. Bull-calf.— First prize, W. Burton ; second, T. J. Eland, Hatfield, Woodhouse. Cow, in calf or milk. — First prize, J. H. Rockett ; second, Messrs. Dudding, Wragby. Heifer, in-calf or milk. — First and second prizes, F. Strick- land, Carlton, Thirsk. Heifer, two years old. — First prize, F. Strickland ; second, J. H. Rockett. SHEEP. One-shear improved Lincoln ram. — First and second prizes, Messrs. Dudding. Improved Lincoln ram, any age. — First prize, Messrs. Dudding ; second, W. Roe, North Scarle Field, Newark. Five improved Lincoln ewes. — First prize, W. Roe ; second, T. Askren, Levels. Five improved Lincoln gimmers. — First prize, F. T. Turner, Armthorpe ; second, VV. Roe. Five improved Lincoln rams. — First prize, E. Belton ; second, W. Roe. pigs; Boar, any breed. — C. F. Hallaa, Huddersfield ; second, J. Garbutt, South Cave, Hull. Sow, any breed. — First prize, C. F. Hallas ; second, J. C. Coups, Barmby Don. Open gilt, any age. — First prize, E. Ellis, Doncaster ; second, J. Garbutt. Two store pigs. — First prize, Parkinson Brothers, Doncaster; second, H. C. Littlewood, Wicker, Sheffield. BUTTER AND EGGS. Pound of butter, flavour, colour, and make. — First prize, Mrs. J. Purdy, Thorne ; second, Mrs. Moore, Thome ; tliird, Mrs. G. Watson, Fishlake ; fourth, Mrs. Rawson, Woodliouse, filth, M. Askren. Twelve eggs. — R. C. Empson, Goole ; second, Miss Gravil , Thorne. THE THOROUGH-BRED STOCK SALE AT THE ALEXANDRA PARK.— This, the second experiment of the sort, w^as held under the auspices of Messrs. Tattersall, with a very iudiflFerent result. The attendance was thin, and not half the yearlings offered were sold, those which did find purchcsers going mostly at very poor prices. THE LABOURERS' STRIKE IN SUFFOLK.— This seems hastening to an end ; the march to the North country being, perliaps, for the present, the last act of the drama. In Norfolk labourers are well paid, well employed, and to all appear inces happy and contented. There is a plentiful supply of hands everywhere, so there is no prospect of a scarcity of labour for turnip hoeing or harvest. — The 'Norfolk Chronicle. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. y^7 ROYAL AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY OF ENGLAND. Monthly Council : Wednesday, July 1.— Present : Earl Cathcart, Vice-President, in the chair ; the Duke of Bedford ; the Duke of Devonshire, K.G. ; the Earl of Leicester ; Viscount Bridport ; Lord Chesham ; Lord Eslingtou, M.P.; Mr. Barnett, Mr. Bowly ; Mr. Cantrell, Mr. Dent; Mr. Druce ; Mr. Evans; Mr. Brandreth Gibbs ; Vlv Horley, Jun. ; Mr. Hornsby; Mr. Hoskyns ; Colonel Kingscote, M.P. ; Mr. Leeds ; Sir A. K. Mac- douald, Bart.; Mr. Pain; Mr. Rigden ; Mr. Statter ; Ml-. Wakefield; Mr. W. Wells; Colonel Wilson ; and Dr. Voelcker. Colonel Kingscote, M.P., was elected a Governor of the Society. The following new members were elected : Allen, George, Unicarville, Comber, Co. Down. Ambrose, Cole, Stuntuey Hall, Ely. Armstrong, George, Graifham, St. Neots. Ashby, Captain G. Ashby, Naseby Woolleys, Rugby. Bidwell, Charles, New Barnes, Ely. Ireeze, Edward, Old Marton Hall, Whittington, Oswestry. Broughall, Edward, Wikey House, Ruyton, 11 Towns. Burton, Oliver, Gwaynynog, Denbigh. Burt, Walter, Wellingore, Grantham. Calver, Thomas. Burnham Thorpe, Lynn. Clay, Edward, Ellesmere, Salop. Cooper, James, Barton Mere Farm, Bury St. Edmunds. Church, George, Bedford. Culverwell, William Thomas, Durleigh Farm, Bridgwater. Fryer, William Rolles, Lytchett Minster, Poole. Green, Edward, The Moors, Welshpool. Higgins, George, Castle Close, Bedford. Horrell, Robert, Oakley, Bedford. Hunt, E. Bradley, Hayes, Uxbridge. Inmau, Henry, Rose Bank, Stretford, Manchester. Kynaston, Rev. Walter C. E., Hardwick, Ellesmere. Lester, James, Kempston, Bedford. Lester, Thomas, High-street, Dudley. Lovell, John M., Harpole, Weedon. Magniac, Charles, Colworth, Bedford. Meredith, Richard, Rednal, Shrewsbury. Noden, Joseph, Bridgemere Hall, Nantwicli. Prior, Benjamin, Leighton, Kimbolton. Ransom, Edwin, Kempston, Bedford. Kigden, Henry, Saltwood Castle, Hytbe, Kent. Sainsbury, Edward, 16, Mark-lane, E.C. Sartoris, Alfred, Abbotswood, Stow-in-the-Wold. Shuker, John, Knightley Hall, Chirl)urv, Salop. Simons, Thomas, Markgate Cell Park Farm, Dunstable. Smith, Henry Herbert, West Lodge, West End, Hampstead. Smith, Thomas, Tillbrook, Kimbolton. Vaughan, Lewis Edward, Trederwen Hall, Arlein, Oswestry. Finances. — Viscount Bridport presented the report, from which it appeared that the Secretary's receipts during the past month had been duly examined by the Committee, and by Messrs. Quilter, Ball, & Co., the Society's account- ants, and found correct. The balance in the hands of the hankers on June 30, was £2,582 7s. 9d., and £2,000 re- mains on deposit. The quarterly statements of subscrip- tions and arrears to June 30, and the quarterly cash ac- count, were laid on the table. This report was adopted, with the addition of the following resolution : That the candidates for election as members of the Society, whose names have just been read, shall be entitled to the privileges of membership at the Bedford meeting on paying their subscription for 187i, and signing the usual conditions. Journal. — Mr. J. Dent Dent, chairman, presented the plan of prizes for Somersetshire farms proposed by the committee as follows : Class 1.— For the best-managed hill-farm, including not less than fifty acres of arable land, and not less than one hundred acres of hill pasture, whether convertible or otherwise, and whether adjacent to the arable land or not, £50 ; for the second best, £25. Class 2. — For the best-managed dairy-farm of not less than one hundred acres in extent, £50 ; for the second best, £25. Class 3. — For the best-managed farm not qualified to compete in either of the foregoing classes, and of not less than two hundred acres in extent, £50 ; for the second best, £25. The entries to be made on or before October 31, 1874. This report was adopted. Mr. Dent Dent then moved, pursuant to notice, on behalf of the Journal Committee, for a grant of £150 to enahle the Secretary to inquire into the stock-farming of Sweden, Norway, and Denmark, with reference to the probable supplies of cattle from those countries to the United Kingdom. This motion was seconded by Lord Esliugton, and carried unanimously. General Bedford. — Lieut. Gen. Viscount Bridport reported the recommendations of the committee with re- ference to the tenders for showyard manure, and for printing the lists of awards ; also with regard to the receipt and delivery of parcels to the showyard, and the engagement of a sufficient number of tlie A division of Metropolitan Police. The Committee also recommended that no animals should be received in the showyard previous to the date fixed in the Prize-sheet, This re port was adopted. Implements. — Mr. B. T. Brandreth Gibbs reported that the Committee recommended the following classifi- cation and prizes for implements to be tried at the Taunton meeting next year — subject to future amendment after consideration during the Bedford meeting : Class 1. For the best one-horse mowing machine (the power required for one-horse machines not to exceed 33,000 foot-lbs. per minute), £20; for the 2nd best, £10 ; for the 3rd best, £5. Class 2. For the best two-horse mowing machine, £30 ; for the 2nd best, £20 ; for the 3rd best, £10. Class 3. For the best haymaking machine, £20 ; for the 2nd best, £10 ; for the 3rd best, £5. Class 4. For the best horse-rake, £15 ; for the 2nd best, £10. Class 5. For the best hay collector, £15 ; for the 2nd best, £10. Class 6. For the best system of drying hay in wet weather, sufficiently economical for practical purposes, large Gold Medal ; for the 2nd best, large Silver Medal. Miscellaneous awards to agricultural articles and es- sential improvements therein, 10 Silver Medals. This report was adopted. Chemical. — Mr. W. Wells (chairman) presented the following quarterly report of the Chemical Committee : The committee have to report that Dr. Voelcker has submitted to them the following cases of inferior manures which have been sent to him for analysis during the past quarter : The first three cases reported again show the advantage of testing manures by independent analysis, in order to ascertain whether they are of equal quality with the analysis furnished by the vendors — more especially in cases where the mixture is sold as special manure prepared for some particular purpose. 1. A sample of barley manure was sent by Mr. W. G. Duncan, of Bradwell, Stony Stratford, who had bought it of an agent at £8 lOs. per ton. Dr. Voelcker reported as follows : 138 THE FARMER'S MAGA2;iNE. Analytical Laboratory, 11, Salisbury Square, Fleet Street, E.G., London, March 9, 1874. Sir, — I beg to enclose a copy of an analysis of the sannyle of barley manure which you sent me a short time ago. The manure is too wet to be readily applied to the land. I do not put a precise money value upon niatiures which are sent me for analysis, but may observe, in a general way, that a manure containing the constituents mentioned in the inclosed copy of analysis, and in the same proportions, can be bought in most places at about £6 10s. per ton. Believe me. Yours faithfully, Augustus Voelcker. "W. G. Duncan, Esq. Composition of a sample of barley manure sent by Mr. W. G. Duncan. Moisture 19.66 Water of combination and *organic matter 15.30 Bi-phosphate of lime (mono-basic phosphate of lime) 11. li Equal to bone phosphate (tri-basic phosphate of lime) rendered soluble by acid (IT-iS) Insoluble phosphates 4.75 Sulphate of lime ^ 42 05 Alkaline salts and masnesia ) Insoluble siliceous matter 7.40 *Containing nitrogen 1.71 Equal to ammonia 2.07 Mr. Duncau communicated this analysis and report to the agent from whom he had bought the manure, and received the following reply, which the makers addressed to the agent, after having had a sample of the manure for analysis by their own chemist : April 2, 1874. Dear Sirs, — I got the sample, and last night got our chemist's report, which I regret extremely to say quite con- firms Dr. Voelcker's. Nothing but carelessness on the part of the men at factory could have made it possible for such manure to be sent out, as it is evident they have not used the ingredients in their proper proportions. We have severely reprimanded our foreman, and told him that if anything of the kind occurs again, he will be instantly dismissed. To yourselves and customer we must express our sincere regret, and can only add that we shall be most happy to take back the manure, pay all expenses he may have incurred, and sup- ply him with other manures in its place. — We are, dear sirs, yours truly, ***** (Manager). 2. Another sample of manure, invoiced as "Phosphatic Cereal Manure," at £7 per ton, also sent by Mr. W. G. Duncan, of Bradwell, Stony Stratford, who had bought it of an agent. With regard to this manure, which was guaranteed to contain 25 per cent, of phosphates in soluble form, and about 2 per cent, of ammonia, Dr. Voelcker reported as follows : Analytical Laboratory, 11, Salisbury-square, Fleet Street, E.G., London, April 13, 1874. Dear Sir, — I beg to ecclose a copy of an analysis of the sample of manure which you call a " cereal manure." This is a misnomer, for you will notice that the manure contains but little ammonia — an essential constituent of every good cereal manure — ammonia, or at all events nitrogen in some form or other. The sample of manure which you sent me for analysis is also poor in soluble phosphate, and in point of fact is essentially a badly-dissolved superphosphate, containing but little nitrogen. A. manure of the composition of the sample analysed by me, in my opinion, is not worth more than about £4 15s. to £5 per ton. I should feel obliged to you to in- form me at what price this manure is actually sold, and by whom it is manufactured and sold. — Believe me, yours faith- fully, Augustus Voelcker. W. G. Duncan, Esq. Composition of a sample of cereal manure, sent by Mi". W. G. Duncan : Moisture 17.16 Water of combination and *organic matter 18.09 Bi-pliosphate of lime (mono-basic piiosphate of lime) 8 33 Equal to bone phosphate (tri-basic phosphate of lime) rendered soluble by acid (13.03) Insoluble phosphates 15.78 Sulphate of lime 7 0007 Alcaline salts and magnesia ) Insoluble siliceous matter 7-78 100.00 * Containing nitrogen 73 Equal to ammonia 89 On receipt of this letter, communications took place betvreen the several parties, with the result that the fol- lowing letter, dated April 16, from the makers, was handed to Mr. Duncan : London, April 16, 1874. Dear Sirs, — We regret much to learn the result of Mr. Duncan's sending to Dr. Voelcker, and at first were much surprised. On inquiries, however, the matter was cleared up, as we are able to connect the complaint with one particular parcel, which was sent out under the following circumstances : On going to dig out of bulk the phosphatic cereal for this order, our foreman discovered that, through our acid tank having sprung a leak, a large quantity of acid had run down into the bin iu which the manure was, and had made it very wet ; so he set to mix, with the shovel, enough ground copro- lite with the manure, as he thought, to dry up the excess of acid. Of course the mixing was most imperfectly done, and was in random proportions. This will fully account for the deficiency in ammonia, the excess of insoluble phosphate, and the general bad character given by Dr. Voelcker to the manure. Fortunately it was the only parcel sent out ; (or, on discovering the matter, we immediately stopped any more going out, and made a fresh bulk, from which we are now delivering. We had no idea, however, that the value of the manure liad been so much reduced, or would have taken steps o prevent its being used. As it is, we can only say how much we regret the circumstance, especially happening as it does with a customer of yours who had complained of another make. We shall leave it entirely in your hands to settle with him as you think right, and beg that you will express our un- feigned regret for the annoyance and trouble it has given to him, as well as make a fair and liberal allowance in money. Should he, fortunately, have not used all, will you please have what remains returned to us, and we will replace it with what we are now sending out, and of the quality of which we are perfectly satisfied. Meanwhile, we remain, yours truly, * * * _ 3. Soon afterwards, on April 22, Dr. Voelcker sent the following report on a manure, invoiced as " Best Super- phosphate of Lime," to Mr. Duncan, at £5 10s. per ton, and guaranteed by the makers (the same firm as in the " Phosphatic Cereal Manure case") to contain 28 per cent, of phosphates, in soluble form, and a small percentage of ammonia: Analytical Laboratory, Salisbury Square, Fleet-street, E.G., London, April 22, 1874. Dear Sir, — I have the pleasure of enclosing a copy of att- analysis of the sample of superphosphate which you sent me a short time ago. I notice in the circular of Messrs. * * * their best superphosphate is stated to contain 28 per cent, of phosphates in a soluble form, and a small percentage of ammonia. I find, however, only 19^ per cent, of soluble phosphate, and thesmall percentage of ammonia really amounts to merely a trace. This superphosphate would be worth £5 10s., if it contained 28 per cent, of soluble phosphate ; but as the insoluble phosphates in it occur as mineral, they are not worth much for the farmer, and in my judgment the sample of manure which you sent me is worth about 25s. less per ton than Messrs. * * * best superphosphate guaranteed to contain 28 per cent, of soluble phosphate. Yours faithfully, W. G. Duncan, Esq. Augustus Voelcker. THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 139 Composition of a sample of superphosphate sent by Mr. W. G. Duncan, Bradwell, Stony Stratford : Moisture 18.60 Water of combination, and *organic matter 9.32 Bi-pliospliate of lime (mono-basic phos- phate ollime) 12.29 Equal to hone pliosphate (Iri-basic phos- phate of lime) rendered soluble by acid (19.25) Insoluble phosphates 10.50 Sulphate of lime ') 4<5 40 Alcaliue salts and magnesia. Insoluble siliceous matter 5.40 100.00 Mr. Duncan having thereupon communicated again with the makers, received from them a reply, dated April 29, and containing the following statement : Our iirm has been too long established, and has for too many years held an honourable reputation, for us to con- descend to any actioa which was not perfectly straightbrwari], and if tlirough any misfortune we get into a dilliculty, we are always ready aud anxious to do what is riglit to get out of it. We will not again refer to tlic matter of the " Cereal" Manure, as Mr. * * told you just tlie simple truth about the way in whicli the mischief occurred, and we have nothing to add to what he stated, except to express our unfeigned regret tiiat ever that parcel left oar establishment. And now as regards tlie superphosphate. This was made as we represent, from the very best materials, and as we believe in the best manner. The difierence, however, between the statement of its composition in our circular and in Dr. Voelckei's analysis, arises mainly from two circumstances — (1). Tliat rightly or wrongly we include as "soluble phosphate" the " precipitated phosphate," of which there are always from 2 to 3 percent, present; these we find Dr. Voelcker classes with the " insoluble." (2). The superphosphate lias evidently " gone back" since it was made, as it will do sometimes when certain substances, such as iron, are present in the original coprolite. Putting these two points together will fully account for the difference. The analysis shows that the phosphoric acid is present, although not in the form represented by us, which will relieve us from any imputation of having "adulterated" tlie manure, which is the point about whicli we are anxious ; as we iuve honestly gone into the business with a determiuation to sell only good articles, and have resolutely abstained from anything in the shape of adulteration. You are probably aware that this is a new trade with us, and we must learn wisdom by experience. We see in Lavves's circular that superphosphate is stated to contain from 23 to 27pf'rcent. of " soluble phosphate," aud that the minimum only is guaranteed. We, unfortunately, in getting out a circular, from want of experience overlooked the fact that manures are liable to ' go back," and did not leave any margin for any such accident happening. As regards what you have left, Messrs. * * will arrange with yoa about sending it back. With respect to what you liave used we have no fear of the result, for although tlie analysis shows only 19.25 per cent, of really " soluble" phos- phate, we are certain that tlie 10.50 of " insoluble" (according to Dr. v.), contains a large proportion of " precipitated.jj which, practically, is just as useful to the plant as the " soluble," and in a very wet season more so, as it is not so liable to he washed down into the subsoil, and is, nevertheless, as good " food" for the roots as the fully " soluble" phos- phate. We do not in the least fear the loss of the turnips, and venture to hope, on the contrary, that ia spite of the un- satisfactory " analysis," you will find the manure produce really satisfactory results. Under any circumstances you shall not have cause to com- plain of our treatment, aud we indulge the hope that though our first transactions have been so very unfortunate, we may have the pleasure of doing business with you in a perfectly pleasant and satisfactory manner for many years to come. — We are, sir, yours faithfully, * * *_ Mr. Duncan, in sending these documents, stated, " I think it only fair to both Messrs. and Messrs. to say that the first-named firm supplied me, gratis, with 3 cwt. of nitrate of 8oda, and that the barley where their manure was sown looks as well, if not better, than any other barley within miles of my farm — that when I sowed the nitrate of soda I left out a strip of barley unsown, and that I can at preseiit see no dilfereuce ia that portion of the crop. As regards the second firm, they make no charge whatever for the ' cereal manure,' which was sown on 4 acres of oats, and have given me G cwt. of nitrate of soda gratis. The superphosphate, or turnip manure, is not charged for either. I used half of it with some early turnips, and the other half Messrs. fetched away. The oats where the ' cereal manure ' was sown look well, but they have been helped by the 6 cwt. of nitrate. I cannot speak fully on this crop yet, because, being later sown than the barley, there is not yet much show, neither can I say anything of the elfects of the manure on the turnips, as they are not yet hoed out. No doubt I was very unfortunate with both these firms, but I hope there was nothing but neglect in their dealing, and not cheating." Under these circumstances the committee withold the names of the' firms in question. 4. A sample of " English nitrate of soda" was sent by Mr. Charles Cock, of Hamshead, near Birmingham, who had bought it of Messrs. Padley and Co., of 40, Toll End, Tipton, Staffordshire, at £12 per ton. This so-called "nitrate" yielded on analysis the fol» lowing results : Moisture and water of combination 32.55 ^Sulphate of iron 40.98 Sulphate of lime 32 Sulphate of soda and a little chloride of sodium (common salt) 22.47 Insoluble siliceous matter 3.73 100.05 * Equal to crystalled sulphate of iron (green vitrol) 74.95. Mr. Cock states " this order was given because a gen- tleman (who stated himself to be a partner with Padley aud Co., and was accompanying their agent soliciting orders) informed nie it was better manure, and would produce better results than the imported nitrate under 5 per cent, refraction " [impurity]. The preceding ana- lytical results, however, show that this so-called nitrate is merely salt-cake and green vitriol, and that it pos- sesses no manurial properties whatever. 5. A sample of oilcake was sent by Mr. George Liddell, jun., of Chilton, Ferry Hill, Durham, who ob- tained it from Messrs. T. and G. Marley, of Bishop Auckland, to whom it had been invoiced by Messrs. Pearson and Bailey, of Hull, as pure linseed cakes at £12 ISs. per ton, each cake being also branded with a triangle and the initials P. B. This cake yielded the following result on analysis : Moisture 11,07 Oil 13.50 ♦Albuminous compounds 26.31 Mucilage, &c 27.22 Woody fibre 9.89 i'Mineral matters 9.01 100.00 ♦Containing nitrogen 4.21 fSand 4.97 Dr. Voeleker reported that this oilcake was not a pure liuseedcake, but was made from dirty linseed, containing many small weed-seeds, and 5 per cent, of sand. 6. Another sample of oilcake, which had been sold at £13 10s. per ton, was sent for analysis by Mr. T. T. Porter, of Baunton, Cirencester, and proved to be not a pure liuseedcake, but made from dirty linseed, full of small weed-seeds and starcliy matter, which does not occur in pure liuseedcake. uo THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE, The fo'lovving results were obtained on analysis : Moisture 14.06 Oil 10.41 ^Albuminous compounds 25. 9t Mucilage, starcli, &c 29.07 Woody fibre 13.49 fMiaeral matter 7.03 100.00 ^Containing nitrogen 4.15 f Containing sand 3.11 This cake, although sold at so high a price, was not invoiced as pure linseed-cake. The committee therefore withhold the came of the vendor. 7. — A sample of soot, which was sent by a member who had bought about 10,000 bushels of it, of a common sweep, at 6d. per bushel, yielded on analysis the following results : Moisture 2.11 ^Organic matter 21.63 Mineral matter 73.27 100.00 *Coutaining nitrogen 42 Equal to ammonia 51 Dr. Voelcker reported as follows : " This sample con- tains but little soot, and consists principally of ground coal-dust, ashes, and rubbish, and is barely worth 10s. per ton. Good soot yields from 3 to 4 percent, of ammonia, and is worth about £2 2s. per ton." On the motion of Mr. Wells, seconded by Mr. J. Dent Dent, this report was adopted, and ordered to be printed in the usual agricultural newspapers. Report on the Composition of 13 Samples of Peruvian Guano, sent by the Secretary of THE Admiralty to the Royal Agriculiural Society of England. These samples were sent to England in sealed bottles, by Her Majesty's ship Peterel, from Callao. The bottles were opened by me on the 9th of June, 1874, and sub- mitted to careful analyses. Five of the samples were taken from the guano deposits of Pabillon de Pica, three from the guano deposits of Punta de Lobas, and five from the deposits of Huanillos. The samples were labelled as follows : Pabillon de Pica. — Guanos. 1. Guano deposit of Pabillon de Pica at La Cueva, taken at 25 feet below the surface. 2. Guano deposit of Pabillon de Pica at San Lorenzo, taken at 15 feet below the surface. 3. Guano deposit at Pabillon de Pica at La Barloventa (white guano), taken at the surface of a large deposit not yet marked. 4. Guano deposit of Pabillon de Pica, Cueva del Rinconada, taken on the surface over deposit of probably more than 100 leet. 5. Guano deposit of Pabillon de Pica, Cueva del Rinconada, taken from about 50 feet lower than No. 4. Punta de Lobas Guano. 1. Guano deposit of Punta de Lobas, taken at 5 feet below the surface, above boring of 20 feet. 2. Guano deposit of Punta de Lobas, taken at 40 feet below the surface. 3. Guano deposit of Punta de Lobas, taken at 8 feet below the surface. Huanillos.— -Guano Deposits. 1. Guano deposits of Huanillos, taken at 5 feet below the surface. 2. Guano deposit of Huanillos, taken at 10 feet below the surface. 3. Guano deposit of Huanillos. taken at I'J feet below the surface. 4. Guano deposit of Huanillos, taken at 13 feet below the surface. 5. Guano deposit of Huanillos, t;iken at 40 feet below the surface. According to a report given by Mr. Thierry, C.E., the estimated quantity of these deposits, which lie to the south of Iquique, are : Tons. Huanillos 700,000 Punta de Lobas 1,601,000 Pabillon de Pica 5.000,000 7,301,000 These are the chief deposits recently surveyed ; for, according to Mr. Thierry, the additional minor guano de- posits bring up the estiinated total amount to 7,680,500 tons, or are only 379,500 tons more than the estimated quantity in the three large deposits from which I received samples for analysis. Pabillon de Pica Gum. The following is Ihe Composilion offhefice samples labelled as above : No. 1. No. 2. No. 3. No. 4. No. 5. Moisture 3.20 5.45 4.13 9.33 6.70 *Organic matter and salts of ammonia 46.17 49.40 59.01 41.32 55.10 Phosphates of lime 25.51 27.01 21.82 23.80 24-55 **Alkaline salts 15.49 15.99 9.00 23.30 13.10 Insoluble siliceous matter (sand) 9.63 2.15 6.04 2.35 1.55 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 *Containing nitrogen 9.81 9.15 15.08 11.03 6.55 Equal to ammonia... 11.91 11.11 18.31 13.38 7.95 **Containing phospho- ric acid 1.81 1.70 1.68 3.48 3.20 Equal to trilasic phosphate of limf 3.95 3.71 3.66 7.59 6.98 Total phosphoric acid 13.49 14.06 11.67 14.72 15.34 All these guanos, it will be seen, contain very little moisture. They are of a light brown colour, and in a fine powdery condition. No. 3 has a lighter colour than the rest, and is remarkably rich in ammonia. It is evi- dently a comparatively-speaking recent guano deposit, and compares favourably with the best old Chiucha Island guano. The amount of ammonia in the four other samples varies from 8 to 13 per cent, in round numbers, and that of sand from 1^ to 9^ per cent. Excepting No. 4, the samples from Pabillon de Pica do not contain so much ammonia as Chincha guano, and al- though dry and powdery, without hard lumps, are inferior to the latter, whilst as regards composition three of the samples nearly come up to the standard of Guancope guano, and are greatly preferable to the latter as regards condition. Punta de Lobas Guano. 27ie follovAncj is the Composilion of the Three Samples from these Deposits : No. 1. 14.53 No. 2. No. 3. Moisture 14.06 4.79 ^Organic matter and am- monia-salts 35.77 49.74 17.U Phosphate of lime 20.50 21.40 23.09 **Alkaline salts 20.35 13.45 27.0t Insoluble siliceous matter... 2.85 1.35 27.94 100.00 100.00 100.00 *Containing nitrogen 6.55 9.99 2.64 Equal to ammonia 7.95 12.13 3.21 * "Containing i)liosphoric acid 3.20 1.21 038 Equal to tribasic phosphate of lime G.98 2.04 0.84 Total phosphoric acid 15.34 11.01 10.95 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 141 The deposit takea at 8 feet from the surface (No. 3), it appears, is used with a good deal of sand ; it contains also a large proportion of alkaline salts, and in consequence is poor in ammonia. At 20 feet the Punta de Lobas sample yielded 8 per cent, of ammonia, and at 40 feet helow the surface, 12 per cent. The 40 feet deposit is a dry and fine guano. It is much drier than Guaucompe guano, and contains as little sand and as much ammonia as good Guaucompe guano on an average. HuANiLLOs Guano. The five samples, labelled as above, on analijsis tvere found lo contain in 100 parts : No. 1. No. 2. No. 3. No. 4 No. 5. 8.23 5.25 12.67 15.39 8.66 Moisture ♦Organic matter and 46.46 41.90 34.83 34.21 47.09 salts of ainmouiii 22.45 30.21 33.20 24.71 24.20 Phosphate of lime... 19.23 16.73 15.69 23.09 16.65 **Alkaline salts Insoluble siliceous 3.64 5.91 3.61 3.60 3.10 matter (sand) ... 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 . 10.40 7.45 6.72 6.65 8.81 ♦Containing nitrogen 12.57 9.05 8.16 8.07 10.69 Equal to ammonia ♦♦Containing pliospho- 5.33 1.47 1.41 1.62 3.26 ric acid Equal to phospliate 11.63 3.21 3.14 3.53 7.11 of lime 15.62 15.30 16.65 12.93 14.35 Total phosphoric acid ' The Huanillos guano samples were all dry and powdery, and of a light brown colour. The amount of ammonia in the several samples varies from 8 to 125 per cent., and that of sand from 2^ to 6 per cent, in round numhers. The proportion of phosphoric acid, in combination with alkalies, and present in a state soluble in water, in sample No. 1, it will be seen, is considerable, as it corresponds to about Hi per cent, of soluble phosphate of lime. The samples No. 2 and No. 3 are also richer in phosphate of lime, but poorer in ammonia, than Chiucha Island guano. It will be noticed that several of the samples analysed by me contain a large proportion of alkaline salts. These salts I find consist principally of chloride of sodium, sulphate and phosphate of potash and soda, with more or less nitrates. As the agricultural and commercial value of manures is much affected by the proportion of nitric acid which they contain, I have carefully determined the per-centage of nitric acid which occurs in these recently surveyed guano deposits, and have discovered that whilst some of the samples contain mere traces of nitric acid and others quantities varying from i per cent, to 1 per cent., a few contain as much as 22^ to 3| per cent, of anhydrous nitric acid. The following are the results which I obtained in determining the nitric acid in the 13 samples : Guano deposit from Per-ceutage of Nitric Acid in Pabillon de Pica, No. 1 01 „ No. 3 61 „ „ IMo. 3 04 No. 4 No 5 .90 1.20 Punta de Lobos, No. 1 3.40 No. 3 No. 3 3.50 .29 Huanillos guano, No. 1 2.87 „ No. 2 2.46 „ No. 3 35 „ No. 4 25 „ No. 5 1.10 The occurrence of nitric acid iu these deposits is no less interesting in a practical than in a theoretical point of view, for it throws some light on the formation of the large nitrate of soda deposits iu tte province of Parapasan and other localities in South Peru. Nitrate of soda probal)ly owes its origin to tie nitro- genous organic matter of guano deposits, whi :h in ihe course of time have been subjected to the action of sea- water aud the oxydizing inlluence of theatmosplicie. The search for guano deposits may probably lead to the discovery of Citcusive nitre beds in the southern parts of Peru. All the samples with the exceptiou of one, vvh'ch is evidently a surface deposit, mixed with much sand, are unquestionable valuable guanos which will command a ready sale in England, especially as tliey are dry and iu a fine powdery condition ; but, as they vary in composition, it will, in my opinion, be found necessary to have each cargo carefully sampled, and to lis the price of the cargo according to the intrinsic value of the guano as ascer» taiued by analysis. Augustus Voelcker. Saturday, 11, Salisbury-square, Fleet-street, E.C., June, 1874. Dr. Voelcker's report was adopted, and ordered to be forwarded to the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, together with a recommendation of the Council, which is embodied in the following communication from the Earl Cathcart (acting for the President of the Society in his absence) to the Earl of Derby, Secretaiy of State for Foreign Affairs : My Lord, — The Couucil of the Royal Agricultural Society have the honour to submit to Her Majesty's Secretary of State for Foreign Atfairs the enclosed report fiom their con- sulting chemist, Dr. Voelcker, on tlie samples of guano seat to the Couucil by the Secretary of State. The Council desire to call the attention of the Secretary of State to tlie great difference of the samples submitted, and tlie varying propor- tion of ammonia and phosphates contained in them. iJritish agriculturists have for some years had to complain tbat all the guano delivered by the Peruvian Government has been sold by tlieir agents at an uniform price, irrespective of its value as determined by analysis, and tlie Council take this opportunity of respectfully urgiug upon the Secretary of State the desirability of impressing upon the Peruvian Government the necessity ot adopting a standard analysis for Peruvian guano, and regulating the price of tlie guano delivered in prci- porlion to this standard analysis. The Council beg to tender tlieir cordial thanks to the Secretary of State for his courtesy in sending to the Council a communication of so much interest at the present moment to the agiicultural community. I have the honour to be, by lord, Your most obedient servant, (Signed) Cathcart. Fducation. — The Duke of Bedford (Chairman) re- ported that the committee proposed that the examination for scholarships be held on Tuesday and AVednesday, November 17 and IS ; and that the entry of boys for these examinations must be made to the Secretary of the Royal Agricultural Sociely not later than September 30, 1874. The following letter was read from Mr. Baldwin on behalf of the Commissioners of National Education in Ireland, requesting that the agricultural aud training college at Glasnevin be admitted on the list of schools eligible to send candidates for scholarships, and the com- mittee recommend that the application be acceded to. The report was adopted. Albert Farm, Glasnevin, Dublin, June 26, 1874. Dear Sir,— The Commissioners of National Education aro anxious that the students of the Albert Agricultural Training Institution, Glasnevin, would be permitted to compete for the scholarships recently established by the Royal Agricultural Society of England.— ^ours faithfully, H. M. Jenkins, Esq. Thos. Baldwin. K 2 142 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. House. — Lieutenant - General Viscount Bridport (ChairiTiaii) reported that the committee had instructed the Secretary to obtain estimates for painting the inside of the house during the ensuing recess, and to report to the committee in August. This report was adopted. Showy ARD Contracts. — Mr. B. T. Brand ret h Gibbs presented the report of the Surveyor, from which it ap- peared that the sliowyard works would be entirely com pleted and the yard ready for use by the end of this week. The local authorities had done everytiiing that was required of tliem, with the exception of the rolling, which the state of the weather had necessarily delayed. The committee recommended the strengthening of the structure of the horse-boxes, and regulations for the ad- mittance of the public to the top of the race-stand. This report was adopted. Selection, — Lientenant-General Viscount Bridport reported the recommeudatioa of the com.mittee that Colonel Nigel Kingscote, C.B., M.P., be elected a trustee of the Society, in the place of Sir Harry Stephen Meysey-Thompson, deceased. This report having beeu received, Colonel Kingscote was unanimously elected a trustee, on the motion of Lord Bridport, seconded by Mr. Barnett. In the absence of the President, Earl Cathcart (as chairman of the meeting) reported the death of Mr. J. Wells, of Booth Ferry, Howden, a member of Council of the Society. A letter was read from the Lord President of the Privy Council, announcing the issue of orders in Council, having special reference to foot-and-mouth disease. A programme of trials of reaping machines, to be held at Soissous this month, was laid before the Council, and ordered to be communicjited to the agricultural news- papers. THE ALEXANDRA PARK HORSE SHOW. As at Islington, so at Alexandra Park, in a fair show of horses, with some first-class ones, there were many, very niauy, ordinary animals, evidently not exhibited by their owners with the hope of getting a prize, but a pur- chaser. The thorough-bred stallions, numbering four- teen, with half-a-dozen or so decent horses amongst them, would not bear a comparison, or the thought of one, with the grand gathering which Citadel, when a four-year- old, headed at Islington ; nor would the muster of road- ster stallions stand a chance in the scale with the collec- tions we have seen in Yorkshire, while, as to the hunters, we only ask those who some years back attended the purely open-air meetings even at the little town of Great Driffield, where horses stood as they would at a fair, if the gathering at Muswell Hill looked as much like crossing a country as those they have seen there, when country gentlemen and masters of hounds vied with each other for almost the mere honour of the thing ? Then, in the opinion of the judges at Islington, a beautiful little hack from Driffield was not worthy of notice, although a well-known prize-taker throughout the country, and here placed at the head of the light-weiglits ; while in heavy division Mr. Harvey Bayley's very clever Enter- prise, though only a second at Islington, easily disposed of his opponents here. But what is the good of quoting these differences of opinion when we know that bench after bench have been unanimous in awarding brutes more adapted for the German sausage trade than hunting, with hundreds of pounds of prize money, and that Muggins who has show interest in his district, appoints Buggins as Judge, and Buggins, who with the like iiterests in his quarter confers the same honor on Mug- gins, and so Buggins and Muggins keep turning up again and again, till people who form opinions without looking under the bark set them down as very knowing gentle- men, with whom it would be the greatest arrogance to differ. Vet what is Laughing Stock but a barrel on stilts ; and why is he placed before Hot Shot, Christmas Carol, or Masi- nissa ? Becausehehasthatflash show -yard trot that no tho- rough-bred, worth a bunch of catsmeat ever has had- King John is really a very good looking horse, and if he had been lucky enough to hit upon the cross to get a Derby winner like his old comi)anion, Marsyas, thou- sands rvonld have thronged round him and thought as the 1 ate Mr. Blenkiron did, that he was one of the hand- somest horses in England, l^or we have seen in our time a hack not worth seven pounds ten, wrapt up in hood and body clothes, with knee caps and bandages as a blind, followed and admired by a wliulo town, while the real Simon Pure with a rug thrown over him and first favorite for the cup, walked quietly away to his quarters, showing that public performance and public opinion are very different thiugs. Citadel is big enough for anything, aud as he has beaten better horses in the showyard than he did on the turf, anything we could say in his favour would be preposterous. There were some tidy three-year-olds. Cawton, a niceish four- year-old has not quite the character of Sir George's nags, and we were never in love with his sire, Volturno, with his weak hocks and straggling hind leg action. Cornish- man galloped well. Caihier, this year's Islington hero was one of the tion est. In the five years old up to not less than fourteen stone many thought The Banker should have beaten Marmalade, as the latter has gone off since we saw him in Lincolnshire, while Mr. Harvey Bayly's Chief Constable was much fancied. Sir George, the pony stallion, is almost as well kuown as St. George and the Dragon, and waj seconded by Cock-o'the-Walk, a deep, lengthy, short-legged one of Major Barlow's. The coach-horses only numbered nine, including absentees. The agricultural horses made a very good, but not a large show, there being seventeen stallions and a dozen four- year-old and upwards mares or geldings. Young Champion, the winner well kuown about the country is certainly more of a dray-horse than adapted for agriculture ; in fact, he is a a tremendous brute, most unwieldy to meet, and as to stej)ping in the furrow, as some of our friends talk about, he would require one at least as wide as the ironway. We always thought Mr. Statters' two ended horse Young Champion a dray horse ; but, in comparison to his monstrous name- sake, he is a neat, light sti^pping nag. The well-known Le Bon is more of a cart horse than either; while Young Lofty, ouce the pride of a show-yard, and the Clydesdales, with Duke of the same breed second at two Royals, were among the unnoticed. lu the four-year-old and upwards the winners and highly commeuded are better kuown in the show-yards all over the country than their judges. With everything cut and dried, as it was last year, we thought anyone might have taken the reins and steered clear of accidents; but such was not the case, and it was an unpardonable neglect on the part of those who saw the lady riders clear the rails out of the ring last season not to have them raised higher this, and so prevented a lamentable accident. But accideuts seemed rather to bo courted than prevented, as the side rails or balks to each set of hurdles were not put up this year, and the gorse hurdles being the higher, it is only due to THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 143 ft miracle and the crowd that some horse, tantalised by taking the same fences so often, did not jump the side rail to get out of the ring. Then again, horses and carriages were allowed to come in the same yard where the show nags were, and horses shown there, although there were trial rings for that purpose last year. More attention should be paid to the parade of classes than was done on Thursday, as this should not be hurried over, with a third of the horses only shown. Why during the best part of the time the horses are out the prize animals and the commended should be stauding like recruits at the end of the ring is beyond our comprehension. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES.— Lord Shannon ; R. G. O. Howard ; and C. Ellerby. STALLIONS. Thoroughbred.— First prize, £70, Major Barlow, Ilaskelon, Woodbridge (Citadel) ; secoud, £30, W. Blenkiron, Middle Park, Eltliani (King Juhn) ; tiiird, £20,11. Hutton, Gloster- place, Portinin-'^quare (Liugbin^ Stock). Reserve: W. Wilson, \\or.Tprby, Hertford (Hot Sliot). Roadster.— First prize, £30, U'. Vary, Bigthorpe, Stamford Bridge (Younj; Fireaway) ; second. £20, B. Mitsliell, Crowe Hall, Denver, Downliam Market (Fireaway the Second) ; tiiird, £10, W. Geddeus, Walpole, Wisbeacli (Great Gun). Reserve : F. Braithwaite, Long Melford, Suffolk (Defiance). Pony.- First prize, £15, G. W. Wilson, Kendal (Sir George) ; second, £10, Major Barlow (Cock o' the Walk) ; third, £5, Fergus Ferguson, Beverley (The Arab). HUNTERS. Three years old. — First prize, £30, E. G. Lpgg,Bearaiuster, Dorset (Black Prince) ; second, £15, T. Jackson, Tattenhall, Chester; tiiird, £10, T. Daireil, West Ayton, York (Ebor Witcli). Reserve: J. L. Scampton, York (The Autocrat). Highly commended : J. B. Bootii, Kdlerby, Catlerick (Baldersby) Commended : J. Goodlilfe, George Hotel, Huntingdon (Lady Mary). Four years old.— First prize, i'oO, Sir G. Wombwell, Newburgh Park, Yorkshire (Cawton) ; second, £25, T. Darrell, Sperkers Hill, York (King of Diamonds) ; third, £15, F. I5:irl()\v (Cornishnian). Five years old and iijiwards. — First prize, £00, H. H. Teesdale, Catterick, Yorksiiire (Jester) ; second, £30, R. Brunton, Middlesboro, York (Joe Bennett) ; third, £30, Sir G. Wombwell (Am as Clark). Commended ; J. R. Welch, Evercreech, Somerset (Bruiiptte). Five years old and upwards, up to not less than U stone. — First prize, £75, H. Jewison, Raisthorpe, Yorksiiire (Pal- merston) ; second, £30, J. T. Musgrave, Beverley, Yorkshire (Marmalade) ; tiiird, £20, W. Armstrong, Kendal (The Banker). Hacks and roadsters, up to not less than 12 stone. — First prizp, £30, F. C. Matthews, Driffield (Ozone) ; second, £20, Sir G. Wombwell (Miss Sykes) ; third, £10, W. Stepiieuson, Cottinstiam, Hull (Princess). Reserve : J. Christy, Chelms- ford (Firefly). Up to not less than M stone.- First prize, £30, T. H. D. Biylev, Elwinstowe House, Ollerton (Enterprise) ; second, £20, 11 Frisbv, Buckingham-gate (Filbert) ; third, £10, J. Grout, Woodbridge, Suffolk. PONIES. Not under 12 nor over 14? tiands. — First prize, £15, H. Fri-hy (Princess Polo) ; second, £10, R. Wright, Salford (Young Apricot) ; tiiird, £5, M. R. Syers, Upper Norwood (Rattier). Reserve: J. Wilsos, Eutield (Prince). Under 12 bands.— First prize, £10, C. Godfrey Tull, Moreton-street, Pimlico (Princess) ; second, £7, W. McDonald, Winchmore Hill (Douald) ; tuird, £3, Edith Field, Weybridge (Daisy). Judges. — H.Biddell, J. Manning and B. Spraggon. Agricultural stallions. — First prize, £iO, T. Stokes, Caldi- cott, Rutland (Young Champion) ; second, £30, T. Scatter, Whitefield, Manchester (Young Champion) ; third, £10, C. Sharpley, Louth, Lincoln (Le Bon). Reserve: Messrs. Yeoraans, Pennymore Hall, Wolverhampton (Pride of England). Carriage horses, lour years old. — First prize, £30, G. Holmes, Beverley (bay gelding); second, £15, H. A Clark, Aspatri;i, Carlisle (bimma) ; third, £5, P. Watson, Tallaght, Dublin (Dodder). Mules. — First prize, £10, C. L. Sutherland Coombe, Croy- don (Rosseau) ; second, £5 (Blossom). Reserve: S. Lang, Clifton (Lass of Poiton). THE HERTS AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT BISHOP'S STORTFORD. This, mainly through the spirit displayed by the town and neighbourhood of Stortford, was no doubt the most successful meeting which the Herts Society, a body of not much calibre, has ever held. The weather and the site were alike favourable, and the attendance very large. The show itself, however, was not one of much more than local interest ; the Shorthorns, useful animals enough, being mostly from the home herds, but with Mr. Tom Jennings, the trainer, winning in a very good class of cows ; while Mr. Chaplin, from Halstead, had the best bull as well as heifer, and Lord Braybrooke the first yearling bull in Christmas Duke. Mr. Gilby did not enter his " crack" Jerseys, and Mr. Tower's pretty Victoria, the second at Stratford, succeeded to first, with Ducal, beaten by Lord Rosslyn in the class of young bulls, and Lord Braybrooke's good-looking Flame taking the first prize for yearling heifers. Lord Braybrooke had also the bust Soutbdowns, as Lord Chesham the best of the other short- wools with his Shropshires; while Messrs. Hales and Gunnell were first for loug-wools. There were very few pigs, 4)ut with Mr. Griggs' good Berkshires amongst them. There was a very creditable display of farm- horses, Mr. Briggs showing the best stallion and Mr. Street of Maiden being first for mare and foal with Cardiff Lass. The " nags," however, were regarded as the chief attractiou, aud the usual Grand Stand was erected ; but this section proved in many ways a failure. The three thorough-bred stallions were, in the outset, discarded as having " no merit ;" while it threatened at one time that almost every good-looking animal would be put out as unsound. Moreover, with two "riding" judges in the ring, the proceedings in the after part of the day became iusufi'erably tedious, as there were continual remonstrances sent from the Committee that they would " be a little quicker." However, first one had a ride and then the other, like boys upon Blackhcath- common, until the thing looked like an absurdity and ended in one. Mr. Gilby's Gentility, who took the first prize in his class in the previous week at Strat- ford, was eventually pronounced to be unsound, although quite as sound as any hunter need be; while another horse, disqualified as unsound at Stratford, here suc- ceeded to a prize! of course by a majority of votes. Mr. Gilby, however, was more "lucky" with Maud, Ladylike, and Wallflower ; while Mr. Hay ward, of South hill, won with his big chesnut Paramour, as well as with RicLelieu, and a clever three-year-old bred by Mr. Purser at Willington. Most of these horses were at the Essex meeting, but about the best nag in the show for his purpose as " a weight-carrying hackney" was Mr. Odams' cob, who had a long lead of his class and plenty oi 14t THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. admirers outside. The judges were: Agricultural Horses, J. Mannina; ; J. H. Plowriijht ; H. Tait. Shortliorns : G.W.Baker; F. Leney ; G. Game. Alderneys: Col. P. M. Wilson; H. Middleton. Sheep and pigs: J. Newman ; Wm. Rigden ; E. Webster. Hunters and hacks: F. Oldaker; H. Corbet ; J. E.Bennett. THE SHORTHORN CLUB. There can be no question but that the Turf owes its respectability as a national pastime to the Jockey Club. Witliout the influence or countenance of that body so precarious a pursuit, as one, moreover, so open to con- lamination, must have long since sunk in public opinion. And the Jockey Club, which watches so jealously over the interests of the Turf, is jierhaps the most exclusive society in existence. It is esseutially an association of gentlemen of high position, who may aflfect the sport; as amongst the picsont members are the Prince of Wales, the Duke of Edinburgh, the Duke of Counaught, the Duke of Cam- bridge, Prince Christian, the Prince of Orange, and the King of Holland. Two of our past premiers, the late Lord Derby and the late Lord Palmerstou, were long on its list, and the Duke of Richmond, amongst others of living statesmen, occasionally takes a part in the pro- ceedings of the Club. At a meeting at Willis' Rooms on Wednesday it was proposed " to form a Club on the model of the Jockey Club to promote the interests of Shorthorn breeders." The reverend gentleman, however, who seconded the reso- lution somewhat protested against such "model," and another holy man, out of orders, suggested that the offensive words should be struck out ; while a nobleman, who had moved the resolution in its original shape, subse- quently came to see that it would be better to do without the Club, as " the Managing Committee of the Herd Book Company would be tlie Committee of Appeal." It is only fair to say that these protests and emendations were very well received, a kind of shudder running through thi company at the very mention of the Jockey Club, of whose actual constitution or use the meeting, with an o -casional exception, knew probably nothing whatever. Like Mr. Stannilorlh, they did not know what they were talking about. For our own part we altogether disagree with the Diike of Manchester, who was so easily brought over, as w; believe it would be far better that the character aud iulegrity of the Shorthorn should be in the possession of a club aud not of a company. The principle of these two bodies must manifestly be essentially dilFereat: the object of a company is on the face of it to make money ; the aim of any society of gentlemen " formed on the model of the Jockey Club" is to discharge a duty entrusted to its keeping free from profit or any prospective reward. The Short- lio.n Herd Book is now in the market at the price of five thuusaiid pounds; as it is quite possible that five persons might have taken first run at this in the way of a very limited company, and thus have constituted themselves the Herd Book Committee. There was nothing whatever to hcve prevented Lords Dunmore, Skelmersdale, and Pen- rhyn, with one or two more, doing this; but they took a broader view of the subject, which resulted in the meeting on Wednesday, when the co-operatiou of all Shorthorn breeders was invited. By all means let the Shorthorn Herd Book develope into a company in accordance with the spirit of the age ; and On every good showing let the members of this com* pany be eligible to sit at the Council table of the Short- horn Club. But, we repeat, the operation and constitu- tion of the company and the club must be kept separate. Let us turn, again, for a moment to the model of the Jockey Club, whose secretary or secretaries are the pro- prietors and editors of The Stud Book. It will thus be eeen that the Club through its officers is in close relation with the conduct of The Stud Book, as no question this connection must be mutually advantageous. But this is a very different thing from making the proprietary of The Stud Book the chief authority or court of appeal for the Turf. And this demarcation line must be maintained in the interests of the Shorthorn. Messrs. Weatherby make a very good income by their book, as Mr. Stratford has done by his, and as the company may continue to do. But the club of a necessity must take higher ground. If we made any exception to the Jockey Club as a model it would be as against its noticeable exclusiveness. A man may hold the rank of a gentleman, be true and just in all his dealings, and have bred a Derby winner or two, but unless he can trace himself for many generations back in Debrett as he can his horse in Weatherby he will stand but little chance of election. We are alrendy glad to see that this principle is not to be so nligiously observed in the Shorthorn Club. It is true that the names of the Earl of Dunmore, the Earl of Skelmersdale, Lord Penrhyn, and Colonel Kingscote sound rather formidable at first ; but Mr. Thomas Booth creeps in at the end, while we hear of Mr. Charles Howard and one or two other experienced men as about to be taken from the rank and file. The Club, no question, will work far stronger in this way ; but, at the same time, that which should be particularly guarded against is too hastily accepting a nomination made at a general meeting, and nothing could be better than the resolution with which Lord Dunmore discountenanced such an attempt on Wed- nesday. It is often enough but sheer toadyism, and should be resisted accordingly. The detinition of a thorough-bred horse has long since come to be recognised ; but we question whether still the pedigrees of Shorthorns flying about are not occasionally of the loosest ; and the influence of the Club must be felt not merely in the home-herd or by the sale ring, but on the show ground. In fact, the prize list goes with the llaclug Calendar just as the Herd Book and the Stud Book rank together ; and we really cannot see but that, with a litlle more liberty of selection, or election, the Jockey Club may be accepted as a model even by the ■niaxime jni, who "rely almost as much on the Herd Book as they do on the Bible." A numerous meeting of Shorthorn breeders aud others was held on Wednesday, July 1st, in Willis' Rooms, St. James' ; the circular calling the meeting running in the following terms : SI', Ciiarles-street, Berkeley-square, W., Jane I5,187t. Sir, — A numerous and influential body of Shorthorn breeders having expressed a wish that some steps should be taken as to the future management of Coalei Herd Book wiienever Mr. Strafford should determine on resigning the editorship ; and as he has now signified to us his desire to do so, we earnestly invite you to attend a raeeting of subscribers to be held at Willis' Rooms, King-street, St. James', at 2 p.m., on AVednesday, July Ist, to consider with him the best mode for the continuation of that work. We remain, yours faithfully, Dunmore, Skelmersdale, Penrhyn, R. Nigel, F. Kingscote, John Stoker, Thomas C. Booth. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 145 The Duke of Devonsiiiiie was called to the cliair, and in opening the iiroceedinns, remarked that in the few words he had to say he desired not to set a bad example by introducing any irrelevant matter whatever, lie should, therefore, simply re- mind them that about two years ago, at a meeting of tiie Shortiioru Breeders' Committee, certain matters were dis- cussed to which he need not more particularly allude; and besides the special oliject they were called upon to consider, they were authorised to deal with any matter which they mi^lit deem of importance as affecting tlie interests of Short- liorn breeders. Mr. Strafford liaving lately announced his in- tention of giving up the management of tlic Herd Book, which lie had conducted with so raucli ability, it appeared to the committee that this was evidently an occasion on which tliey were called upon to take action, inasmuch as the future ma- nagement of the Herd Book was a matter in which the interests of Shorthorn breeders were in every respect greatly concerned. Tliey accordingly took up the subject and had given it a gre:itdeal of attention, and they were now prepared to lay the result of their deliberations before the meeting. The 1>« tlieu called upon Colonel KiNsscoTE, who read the following statement: It will probably be in the remembrance of many gentlemen now present that a meeting of Shorthorn breeders was lield at the residence of the Earl of Dunmore, 8G, Brook-street, Gros- venor-sq are, London, on the 23rd day of July, 1872, to con- sider certain questions then pending. At that meeting a committee was appointed to e.'samine and report upon those questions, and that committee was also authorised to deal with any other questions which might be submitted to them in which the breeders of Short- liorns might be interested, and it liad power to add to its numbers. That committee having heard from Mr. Strafford that he was desirous of resigning the editorship and future management of Coafes's Herd Book, and liaving taken counsel witli two other Shorthorn breeders, thought it was a suitable moment to invite the subscribers to the book to meet and consider with Mr. Stratford the best mode for the contiuuatiou of that work, and thereupon issued the circular convening this meeting, the circular being signed by the com- mittee appointed at the first-mentioned meeting, and by two ther gentlemen whom the committee have added to their number. The committee present to this meeting the following observations in the nature of a report, and by way of intro- ducing the subject for discussion. The committee think that having regard to the public importance now attached to the breeding of Shorthorn cattle, and to the consequent obligation upon all Sliorthoru breeders to secure accuracy in all matters affecting Sliorthorn pedigrees, the time has now arrived when Shorthorn breeders should unite themselves into an association to ensure for themselves and the pub ic generally the best in- formation on these points that can be obtnined. With this view they recommend Shorthorn breeders, first, to form a company, on the model of a limited liability company, for the purchase of Mr. Strafford's Herd Book, and the iuture preparation and publication of a Shorthorn book ; and next, to form a Club, on the model of the Jockey Club. to consist of Shorthorn breeders as members, and a limited Managing Committee, lor the purpose of collecting and transmitting to the Club, year by year, with the view to publication, accurate information as to past and current pedigrees and sales, and of promoting the general interest . of Sliortlioru breeders. It is anticipated that the Coinjiany and the Club will work in harmony ; and if the result sliould answer the expectations now formed, it may be desirable to apply lor a Charter lor the incorporation of a Shorthorn Association, on the model of the Royal Agricultural Society of England, in which the Club might be merged, and by which the Herd Book might be published as part of the proceedings. The Earl of Feversham proposed the first resolution as follows : " That this meeting resolves to form a company for the purchase from Mr. Strafford of the Shorthorn Herd Book, and for its future preparation and publication." He wiahed to express the feelings and acknowledgment which were due to Mr. Strafford for the admirable manner in which he had cuu- Gucted the editing of the Herd Book up to this time. That gentleman had carried on that work in a most impartial and wise spirit. He had not conducted it on any exclusive principles, but had made it as comprehensive as cir- cumstances wo'Ald permit. He believed that was the best way of conducting the work, and he trusted that in any arrange- ments which might be made for carrying it on in future the same principles would be adopted, and that it would be characterised by liberality and comprehensiveness The transfer of this property would require a con- siderable sum of money, and it would, therefore, appear that a company would be a very proper raoJe of effecting the object in view. There would be, of course, a proper direction formed, and one which would not fail to inspire confidence among Shorthorn breeders. They would, in the first instance, be entrusted with the negotiations with Mr. Strafford, and the subsequent carrying on of the publication would probably be entrusted to a board of directors or com- mittee. Ue had no doubt such a body could be formed which would merit and command confidence. Mr. Pole Geli,, in seconding the resolution, trusted the meeting would acknowledge its importance, and would con- sider it proper that some such steps as those suggested should be taken to maintain such a very valuable publication as the nerd Book. Lord PEr^RHYN thought it desirable that some intimation should be given to the meeting of the mode in which it was proposed to carry on the work. He did not want details gone into, but some sort of outline might be given o the way in which the company was to be formed. Mr. JoNATUAN Ragg said whatever plan was adopted, it was essential that perfect reliance should tbe placed in the integrity of the book If a committee were formed out of the present meeting, with the noble Duke a'? chairman, breeders might rely upon the book almost as com- pletely as they did upon their Bible. Mr. Harward stated that the mode of carrying out the arrangement would be very plain and simple. As regards the company, the committee would have to consider the mode of its formation, the number and value of the shares, the capital required, and the sum to be paid to BIr. Strafford. Having drawn up that scheme, they would look to the subscribers to tiie Herd Book for suggestion", and shape their course accord- ingly. The oliject of the present meeting was to get the principle established, and collect the opinions of the breeders, with the view of considering them afterwards. The broad principle had been laid down that every branch of Shorthorn cattle should be represented, and that no preponderance of interest should be given to one class over another. He thought the noblemen and gentlemen who had convened he meeting constituted a sufficient guarantee on that head, and that the future management of the Herd Book would be conducted on the same judicial and impartial manner as heretofore. Mr. LoDER, speaking for the class who might be termed the greenhorns of Shorthorns, would like to say a few words. The resolution stated that it was desirable to form a company. It had always been his opinion that it was not only desirable to form a company, but to go a little further, and he had no doubt the committee who had called the meeting, and who were so much interested in this matter, would be able to give some data which would enable b-eeders to calculate what were the prospects of such a company. Eor instance, he supposed the committee knew what sum was to be paid to Mr. Stralford, and upon what basis and to wliat *amount the shares of the company were to be issued. These were matters which might just as well be mentioned now, because it was uulikcly that the iniormatiou would be afterwards given at so large a meeting as they had at present. On a future occasion, iie might make remarks on other subjects, and in the meantime he might state that he held in his hand a catalogue of a sale of Sliort horns to take place next day. Mention was made in the catalogue of a cow which belonged to him, and there was another about bearing of the same name and numlier. Now, he thoujiht in the pre- paration of the Herd Book attention should be directed to the subject of two or more animals bearing the same name with the view of getting a distinction made. Mr. Harward said, in answer t j the first qnestion put by Mr. Loder, he might state that Mr. Strafford had seen the Committee, and had named the sum of £5,000 as the pur- chase price of the plant, goodwill, and copyright of the Herd Book, and the Committee had been given to understand that other parties were prepared to give hiin about that amount. No agreement, however, had been made, and no estimate had been formed as to the sum which should be paid. That 146 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. amougst other tilings woiil;! require aud .i uuld receive careful consideration, aud whatever resolution was come to by the Committee would necessarily be submitted to the subscribers before the sum was fiually fixed. He thought that matter might safely be left in the hands of the Committee at present. With regard to the amount at which the shares should be fixed, the Committee had received various suggestions, and they were day by day receiving o'.l ers, and doubtless the shares would be fixed at such a sum as would meet the wishes of the whole body of the subscribers. The Committee had formed no definite idea as yet, and would be ready to receive suggestions from any Shorthorn breeders. It was thought that the sum should not be so large as to make the company exclusive, or so low as to make it insignificant. Mr. Stone asked if the Committee could give any idea what the publication of tlie book would yield to the company. If the meeting knew what it had realised in the past, there vrould be some substantial basis to work upon in the future. Mr. Harwakd said each volume produced £1,500. Mr. Stone : Do you nieaa profit P Mr. Eakward : No ; that is the gross yield. Part of that sum was derived from the entries, and the other part from the sale of the book. Mr. Strafford estimated the expense at £780. Mr. Stkaffokd said he had made a calculation that if the price were the same the return would be not less than £1,500. The printing cost £500, but a sufficient balance would be lelt, after d'fraying all expenses, to pay a dividend of 10 per cent. Mr. Stone said whether the Company paid a large or small dividend, his feeling would be decidedly in the direction of making the book as cheap and as comprehensive as pos- sible, so that the smallest breeder might experience no diffi- culty in acquiring the knowlege which the Herd Book would furnish. If the book were to get into the hands of every breeder, it would tend more than anything else to encourage the breeding of Shorthorns. Mr. Uarward observed that, so far as he could ascertain the views of the Committee at present, their great object would be to maintain tlie integrity of the Herd Book, botli as a safeguard to themselves aud other breeders, and as a guarantee to the purcliaser that what appeared in the volume was " tbe truth, the whole truth, aul nothing but the truth." At the same time it was desirable to make it as reasonably profitable as possible. There was one drawback which the Company would feel, namely, the reprinting of tlie back volu'nes, which were out of print, and the work had to be done in such a way that it left no great m.irgin for profit. A Gentleman, whose nam? did not transpire, said the whole mat'er appeared pretty well cut and dry witliout asking all the Sliorihorn breeders to meet togetlier (" No, no"). He hoped, on behalf of breeders who were not present that the price of entries would not be increased, but that it would be continued at the same rate as at present. The price was quite enough now, as all, like himself, who had been subscribers for twenty years could testify. Lord DuNJiORE appealed to the meeting whether the re- marks just heard were fair to tliose who had taken so much trouble with tliis matter (cheers). Tlieyhad not corae there with anything whatever cut and dry. If the speaker thought there were good reasons for attacking the Coraniitfee for liaviugcvery- thing cut and dry, why did he not corae with something cut and dry hiinselt ? lie thuuglit the previous speakers had wandered away from the subject. The resolution simply asked the meeting whether they thought it desiraljle to form a company for the purchase of the Herd Boole. Nothing else could be settled tliat day. All details must be arranged at a future meeting. The resolution was then put and agreed to, with only the one dissentient. The Duke of Manchester said, as l;e was one of the green horns alluded to by a form; r speaker, it might appear presumptuous in him to propose the second reso- lution in a meeting of gentlemen of so inucli more experience ana fame in this matter than himself. He should not have appeared so prominently had he not been requested by those who iiad called tiie meeting to undertake this duty. He had great p^asure in acceding to the request, for, inexperienced as he was iu Shorthorn breeding, he was very glad to have this opportunity of meeting so many gentlemen who were famous for breeding cattle well'known in all Her Majesty's domiaious and many other parts of the world. He took great interest in the colonies, and from his connection and friendship with many colonists, he was aware in what high estimation Shorthorn breeding was held by them. The Shorthorn breeders iu this country were, as a matter of fact, stocking the existing uu- pi opled wilds and unoccupied lands with the best race of animals iu the world. Little as he knew of Shorthorn brted- iog, he believed it had become of fully equal importance with the breeding of race liorse<, whilst it was quite as interesting and very much less baneful to those engaged in it. He, therefore, thought it of great importduce that Short- horn breeders should have a Parliament or Council of their own to manage their affairs, to regulate, control, aud keep a check upon the pedigrees of animals, and to certify that what was said about them was true. He begged to move " That it is desirable to form a club on the model of the Jockey Club, to consist of Shorthorn breeders and managers, with a limited managing committee, for the purpose of collect- ing and publishing accurate information as to past and current pedigrees and sales, and promoting the general interest of Shorthorn breeders." As to the fees to be charged for the book it would obviously be the interest of the company to keep them down as low as they could. The object of the company would not be to make a profit. If they charged too high for entries, tliey would cut tlieir own throats. The Rev. T. Stanifortu seconded the resolution, with one little proviso, that he did not understand the model of the Joi'kt-y Club. He thought it quite right that the pre- [ja; liiott and future issue of the Herd Book should be en- trusted not simply to a committee, but to some person who understood pedigrees. They had all confidence in the impar- tiality and honesty of Mr. Strafford. Had it not been for his clear eye, sound judgment, and intimate knowledge of pedi- grees, many animals would have crept into the breed un- worthily. That showed the necessity of looking sharply after the matter. As to animals having the same names, he thought that could not be prevented, and those interested would have to decide the relative merits of such cattle irom their numbers, and by studying their pedigree. No doubt there was a difficulty iu finding new u 'mes, but he himself was lucky in having a great many lady friends, who assisted him with names. Mr. John Booth suggested that the words " model of the Jockey Club" should be struck out of the resolution, and that all details should be left to the committee who would be nominated. The Duke of Manchester approved of the suggestion. Colonel GuNTER thought if the Club were to point out the inconvenience of having cattle of the same name, breeders would find new names, and thus prevent the pirating of herds. In the colonies, animals often got a fictitious value from the circumstance that the names were the same as those of some well-knowu cattle in this country. Lord Penriiyn acknowledged the difficulty alluded to, but thought there was no more chance of remedyiug the matter than there was of numbering aud re-naming all the Smiths in the world. Mr. Dent asked whether the Club was to be entirely inde- pendent of the Company, and how the Club was to be iormed ? The Duke of Manchester thought that it would be better to strike out the word Club altogether, as the managing com- mittee of the "Herd Book Company" would be the committee of appeal in all cases of disputed pedigree. Colonel Loyp- Lindsay was of opinion that the word " Club" conveyed to one's mind a certain amount of exclusive- ness which was not desirable. If the company were started, a committee could be appointed who would constitute a court of appeal. He proposed to insert " society" instead of " club." Mr. Storer said this meeting was only a preliminary one. The matter should be left as it stood, and a committee in- structed to bring up a general report on a future occasion. Such matters as those discussed could not be settled in that room. It had been suggested that the Royal Agricultural Society's show at Bedford would be a good opportunity for holding the second meeting. The Duke of Manchester thought it would cause con- fusion if too many alterations were made. As had been saidi a committee would draw up a scheme to be submitted to the Shorthorn breeders. I'HE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 147 Mr. Deijt asked if it was necessary to liave both a society and a com|)any to conduct tlie Ihrd Book. Would it not be possible (or the subscribers to tlie company to form a com- mittee to look after pedigrees ? Lord liUNMORE replied tliat that was always understood by those who dresv up the resolulious. This meeting was simply called to take the sense of tiie breeders, wliether it would be desirable to form a company. The resolution wa? then adopted unanimously, the word " society" l)eing substituted fur " club," and the words " model of the Jockey Club" omitted. Lord CnESHAM moved tiiat the following noblemen and gentlemen should form a committee to consider tlie suggestions made, and bring up a report hereafter: Eurl of Dunraore, E.irl of Skelmersdale, Lord Penrhyn, Mr. Nigel, F. Kingscote, Rev. J. Storer, Mr. Pole Gell, and Mr. T. C. Booth. He remarked that everyone he had named was earnest in the work, and it was fortunate that the matter siiould be undertaken by them. Mr. B'^WLEY seconded tlie resolution, and expressed regret at the reflectious wlucii had been cast upon those who had couveued the meeting. He was glad they had got such liigh- minded men amongst them to take tiielead iu this important matter. They were men without bias or prejudice, and the breeders cnuld repose the greatest confidence in them. The resolution was at once agreed to. On the motion of Lord Bridport, seconded by Col. Loyd- Jjiiidsay, a vote of thanks was passed to the Duke of Devon- shire for presiding, and the proceedings terminated. THE IRISH CATTLE TRADE. Considering how thoroughly the sympathies of the Conservatives are assumed to be with Agriculture, it is remarkable how much in a very short time the present Government lias effected to correct such an impression. It has turned tail on the Malt-tax ; it has shirked and trimmed over Teuaal-Right, and it is now intent on undoing anything done to prevent the spread of the more serious diseases amongst cattle. As everybody knows who has given any attention to the subject, one of the moii fertile sources of contagion for some time past has been Ireland ; or, as the Committee of last session put it, " many complaints have been made by English and Scotch farmers with regard to the Irish imports, alleging that these have caused an increase both of pleuro-pneu- mouia and foot-and-mouth disease." Countered as the other members of the Committee continually were by the Irish contingent, they were not enabled to speak out so strongly as they otherwise would have done, but still they went so far as to advise, "that the regulations in Great Britain and Ireland witli regard to contagious dis- eases be similar — that such regulations be carefully en- forced at the landing-places both iu Great Britaiu and Ireland — and that the Irish Government take steps by inspection at Irish ports to prevent the shipment to Great Britain of any diseased or infected auimals." And upon this suggestion, coming under the immediate authority of the Vice-President of the Council, Mr. Eorster, his col- leagues decided to act. The importation of Irish stock was to be watched with all that care and suspicion which its condition but too well warranted. It is noticeable, however, how there has long been a kind of Conservative feeling manifested in dealing with the cattle trade of the sister King- dom. No language could be too strong, no regula- tions could be too severe when touching on the case of the foreigner. He was always bringing in pleuro and foot-and-mouth, as over and over again some still more terrible disorder was reported to be coming up the Thames. Meetings were held, and resolutions were passed, declaring it to be simply ruin to laud anything alive from the Continent ; while at the same time it was regarded as something very like bad taste to say a word about Ireland, although far more disease was known to be drifting in from that quarter. Graziers, it was said, could not get on without their customary supplies of Irish steers, as occasionally they came to admit that they would prefer risking an attack of foot-and-mouth disease to being cut off from such importations. So far the Commons Committee may be regarded as going with these views, for, as the Report runs, " the consumer and the producer would consider the remedy — that of stamp- ing out — to be worse than disease." And again, " such an interference with the home trade in animals would much affect prices." In fact, much of the agitation over foot-and-mouth is little better than a sham ; but pleuro- pneumonia is a far more serious matter, and so the Com- mittee recommended that " the slaughter of all cattle affected with this disease should be compulsory" — that "the regulations in Great Britain and Ireland should be similar" — and that "the Irish Governnieut should take steps by inspection at L'ish ports to prevent the shipment of any diseased or infected animals." And these resolu- tions or recommendations were, in Parliamentary phrase, approved. Just now, however, wc are threatened, according to common report, with another extensive outbreak of pleuro- pneumonia, and so, of course, there could be no more fitting time to relax any very stringent conditions. As Sir Michael Beach pntit on thepartofthepresentGovenimeut," honour- able gentlemen would fully appreciate the difficulties which stood in the way of the compulsory slaughter of cattle shipped from Ireland." But why so especially from Ireland more ihan from any other country ? Surely the slaughter of a diseased Irish beast is as justifiable and imperative as that of a Frenchman or a l)utchman ! Again, " there came the question whether tlie system of slaughter had been successful iu those countries to which it had been applied. He believed it had been tried iu several coun- tries in Europe, and had been abandoned because of its euornious expense." But assuming this statement to be true, why should we make so curious an exception with regard to Irelmd? as if the system of slaughter is not successful, why should we incur any further enormous ex- pense in continuing it elsewhere ? Sir Michael Hicks Beach would seem to possess a remarkably illogical turn of mind, or perhaps he has only caught the tone of his adopted country, " By Jabers ! it is no use whatever to try to cure the noble bastes of Green Erin by killing them, but you ought to kill everybody else's." Further, Sir Michael says, " if disease from Ireland was imported so largely as was alleged, it was strange that there had been no complaints." No complaints! Why we have been complaining, and not merely complaining, but proving our case for years; or if Sir Michael Hicks desires any more official evidence as to the cattle disease imported from Ireland, we would refer him to Professor Browne, a gentleman at the head of the veteriuary department of the Privy Council office. No complaints ! Why the House of Commons Committee formed its strongest recommenda- tions upon the weight of these complaints. No com- plaints ! "Why just previously on Friday night Mr. Stewart had stated how " he lived in a part of Scotland to which there was a large trade from Ireland, and they were very much afraid of the iiitrodiictiou of disease." Mr. Evans said " Dei by shire would be seriously incon- venienced if the importation of cattle from Ireland were stopped ; but the regulations as to compulsory slaughter if inconvenient had on the whole been beneficial." In the Upper House Lord Kimberley said " So long as aaimala suffering from pleuro-pneumoaia and 148 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. foot-and-mouth disease were allowed to be imported into England from Ireland it was utterly futile to expect that those diseases could be stamped out in England, however stringent might be the rules in this country. For instance, it was the practice for large num- bers of diseased animals to be landed in Norfolk from Ireland, and thecoQsequence was the disease could not be stamped out." Mr. Barclay asks for a more vigilant and effective inspection on embarkation, and we hear oSicially in reply that the Irish Government will do the best it can. This does not amount to much, nor does Sir Michael Hicks ap- pear very desirous to do much. If, however, there is to be any exceptional legislation over this business, people will only waste their time in talking about the danger of foreign stock, while we can continue to count upon the existence of this so haudy home. STOCK SALE. SALE OF MESSRS. LENEY'S SHORT HORNS At Orfines, Watering bury, on Thursday, July 2, 1874. BY ME. STRAFFORD. A happy combination of events all tended to render this one of the most successful of sales of this season, and an average of £221 lOa. for 41 head — the majority of which were young animals — is a great encouragement to Messrs. Leney to continue those lavish outlays for good animals that have recently distinguished their line of breeding. A few years ago their bulls were not looked upon as fitting sires for some very capital cows and heifers of the Charmer and Knightley blood in which their herd was so strong. In 1872, at Winterfold, Eighth Duke of Geneva, a pure Duke bull, as closely bred to Mr. Bates' herd as anything in this country (notwith- standing Mr. George Bedford's assertion of his great Duke bull in Kentucky, U. S. A.), was purchased for 1,650 gs. ; and for the heifers Sixtli Duke of Oneida was imported from the New York Mills at 1,200 gs. These two bulls gave an immense lift to the herd ; and with two such cows as Seventh Duchess of Geueva and Grand Duchess of Geneva, for bull breeding, they may hold a high position in the Bates market for some years. Both bulls were paraded before the sale, and again in the ring immediately precedina; it. That the younger one, Sixth Duke of Oneida, was the favourite there can be no two opinions ; perhaps a little small for his age, three years in October, he is nevertheless a remarkably good bull, of great substance, capital form, and line masculine character ; indeed he is unlike what has been for years looked upon as Duke character. His dam. Lord Bective's seven- thousand-guinea cow, is one of the grandest cows in the country, and she has the Romeo cross running in her veins on her sire's side. Like his sire (Fourth Duke of Geneva, now Mr. Renick's property in Kentucky, where he is mated with the Red Roses), his hair is a trifle harsh, but this slight blemish is overcome in the blaze of his general excellence. Eighth Duke of Geneva looks thin, being kept so for use and lightness; he is of large size, aud with that high mettle and nervous disposition for which the strain is so well known. His head and neck are very grand, and he is of great length; but he wants more middle, his length giving a sinking in the back that is not admirable. As a stock getter he will certainly rank high ; five large calves rising a year old by him were shown in pens under the cherry-trees that were a nice lot, mostly of a colour, and good size and quality. It was remarkable that the best two of these five made the lowest prices : some thought lot 16, others lot 14, a gayer roan, but with not so good a back as on lot 16, though more even. The Rev. R. B. Kennard purchased this one at 130 gs., her dam being of Johu Wood's old Garland blood ; and lot 16 went to Mr. Henry Brassey at 250 gs., her dam being of Lord Ducie's Louisa or Lizzy tribe^ of Charge's blood. Mr. George Fox gave 300 gs. for lot 15, of the Knightley Walnut family. Mr. Stavely Hill and Mr. Jon. Rigg took the other two at 290 gs. each. But the pick of the sale was another and younger calf by Eighth Duke of Geneva; this was lot 19, Fourth Grand Duchess of Geneva, a granddaughter of Seventh Duchess of Geneva, bred by Mr. Sheldon, U. S. A., im- ported in 1867, and bought by Mr. Leney, at the Windsor sale, for 700 gs. ; she is a very grand white cow, better than her daughter by Fifteenth Grand Duke. The calf was thin, but well grown ; Mr. Leney, not intending to sell it, had given it ordinary keep uutU the last six weeks, when it had been running with a nurse, and will probably grow into a large fine heifer. A thousand guineas was talked of as the opening bid, but Mr. Loder's fifteen hundred seemed to stop all opposition for a time. Mr. Holford added fifty-guineas bids three times, but Mr. Loder's two thousand took the calf to his estate at Whit- tlebury (late Lord Southampton's), adjoining Mr. Oliver's farm ; so that Northamptonshire, as of old, will still be the home of some of our finest Shorthorns. The calves by Sixth Duke of Oneida were darker in colour a id not being in such bloom as the older ones appeared to less advantage, still they sold remarkably well, Mr. Loder again taking quite the pick of them in Oxford Fausley 6th, a broad thick roan calf, slightly scouring, at 225 gs. There were five useful cows in nice condition and mostly in-calf. Mr. Blundell bought Lot 1, Lactea Oxouiensis, out of Sir Chas. Knightley's old Lactea, at 240 gs. Mr. Drewry, for the Duke of Devonshire, bought Lily, one of the Bell-Bates line, a fine large broad-backed cow, at 170 gs., and her calf by Sixth Duke of Oneida at 120 gs. Lot 3, Knightley Grand Duchess, another Bates on Knightley, went ratherdear, at 350 gs.,to Mr Larking, who got several other lots. Thorudale Duchess, recently calved, looked plain and thin, still she ran up to 100 gs. (Mr. Jon. Riggs, Kent), and the Queen, bred from the hei'd at Windsor, was bought by Lord Uhesham for 160 gs. Lot 6, Primrose, a thin fleshed cow, of nearly pure Knightley blood, excited keen competitiou, and Mr. A. Brogden finally took her into Lancashire at 335 gs. Two whites followed ; one of the Charmer line, being recently calved, made only 225 gs. ; but Oxford Fausley 4th, full of hair and heavy in-calf, was one of the handsomest lots. Sir Curtis Lampson's 400 gs. finally secured her for Suss°-x against strong opposition from Lancashire. Columbia Duchess, by Fifteenth Grand Duke, was also greatly run upon, but she is also retained in the south by Mr. Larking. Mr. Sheldon, who had bid strongly for her and several preceding lots, purchased Lot 10 of the Charmer tribe, a strong good heiier, at 320 gs. The bulls were a fair good number, and their sale was greatly assisted by Mr. Larkworthy taking three of the best at 210 gs. (lot 8, brother to lot 16), 140 gs. (lot 11, of the Furbelow line), and 81 gs. (lot 2, brother to lot 7) for New Zealand. Mr. Collard bought lot 9, a pure Bates bull ni the Wild Eyes tribe, at 145 gs. He is a thick good white, aud likely to do excellent service near Canterbury. Lot 1, Young Knightley (own brother to THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. U9 lot 6 cows, sold for 335 gs.), was bought by the Rev. J. Storer.it GOgs. ; and The Friar, a promising red calf of the Charmer line, goes to the llev. Chas. Marshall, Surrey, at 58 gs. Lord Penrhyu, chairman of the Shorthorn Committee, presided at the lunch, and it may be justly said that the same assembly of noblemen and breeders that thronged Willis' Rooms the day previously had a " country meeting" the following day in (he pleasant vales] of Wateringbury. Moreover, the Stratford meeting of the Essex Society brought many up from the Eastern Counties, and two days' showing was happily relieved by a pleasant day's selling in Kent. The heavy corn crops, the healthy hop- bines, and the rich pastoral look of the surrounding country, all indicated the high farming that Messrs. Leney's Shorthorns necessarily caused ; and this their third public appearance, wjth average of 211 gs. on the 60 gs. and 70 gs. averages of 1869 and 1871, is the best indication of the high and fashionable character of the herd. COWS AND HEIFERS. Lactea Oxonensis, roan (18G7), by Imperial Oxford (18081), dam Lactea by Sarawak (15238).— Mr. J. H. Blundell, 340 gs. Lily, wliite (1867), by Lord Liverpool (2-2168), dam Levity by Lord Thoresby (14856). — Duke of Devonshire, 170gs. Knightley Grand Duchess, roan (1867), by 4tli Grand Duke (19874), dam Nymphalin by Bull's Run (19368).— Mr. J. W. Larking, 305 gs. Tiiorndale Duchess, red roan (1869), by r2th Duke of Thorn- dale (26020), dam Waterloo Duchess 2ad by Waterloo Duke (21077).— Mr. J. Riffg, 100 gs. The Queen, rich roan (1869), by Lord Oxford 2nd (20215), dam Princpss Alice by British Prince (14197), — Lord Chesham, 160 gs. Primsose, roan (1871), by Sir Charles Kuightley (27466), clam Pipalee by Bull's Run (19368).— Mr. A. Brogden, M.P., 335 gs. Charming Lady 2nd, white (1872), by Grand Duke of Oxford (28764), dam Charming Maid by Lord Liverpool (22168). —Sir G. R. Philips, Bart., 225 gs. Oxford Fawsley 4th, white (1872), by Grand Duke of Kent (26289), dam Oxford Fawsley 2nd by Lord Oxford 2nd (20215).— Sir Curtis Lampson, Bart., 400 gs. Colnmbia's Duchess 3ril, roan (1872), by 15th Grand Duke (21852), dam Columbia by Bull's Run (19368).— Mr. J. W. Larking, 335 gs. Twin Duchess 6th, roau (1872), by Grand Duke of Kent (26289), dam Twin Duchess by 4th Duke of Thorndale (17750).— Mr. H. J. Sheldon, 320 gs. May Duchess 5tb, roan (1872), by Grand Duke of Oxford (28764), dam May Queen by May Duke (13320).— J. Rigg, 70 gs. Beauty 2nd, roan (1873), by Grand Duke of Oxford (28764), dam Sultana 2nd by Man in the Moon (18320).— Mr. J. Rigg, 110 gs. Rosy, roan (1873), by Grand Duke of Kent (26289), dam Lactea Oxonensis by Imperial Oxford (18084).— Mr. J. W. Larking, 270 gs. Queen of Garlands, roan (1873), by 8th Duke of Geneva (28390), dam Garland 5th by Waterloo Duke (21077) — Rev. R. B. Keunard, 130 gs. Columbia's Duchess 4th, rich roan (1873), by 8th Duke of Geneva (28390), dam Columbia by Bull's Run (19368),— Mr. G. Fox, 300 gs. Lady Louisa's Duchess 5th, roan (1873), by 8th Duke of Geneva (28390), dam Lady Louisa by Archduke 2nd (15588).— Mr. H. Brassey, M.P.. 250 gs. Baroness Fawsley 4th, rich roau (1873), by 8th Duke of Geneva (2839(J), dam Baroness Fawsley by 15th Grand Duke (21852).— Mr. A. S. Hill, M.P., 290 gs. Sweetheart, roan (1873), by 8th Duke of Geneva (28390), dam Sylph by Knightley Grand Duke (24268).— Mr. J. Rigg, 290 gs. Fourth Grand Duchess of Geneva, roan (1873), by 8th Duke of Geneva (28390), dam Grand IDuchess of Geneva by 15th Grand Duke (21852).— Mr. Loader, Whittlebury, Nor- thamptonshire, 2,000 gs. Surprise 3ri', red and white (1873), by 8th Duke of Geneva (28390), dam Tacita by Duke of Rutland (19641).— Lord Feversham, 200 gs. Baroness Fawsley 5th, red (1874), by 6th Duke of Oneida (30997), dam Baroness Fawsley 3rd by 15th Grand Duke (21852).— Mr. J. Robinson, 120 gs. Wellingtonia 4th, roan (1874), by 6th Duke of Oneida (3U997), dam WeHingtouia 3rd by Grand Duke of Kent (26289).— Rev. W. Sneyd, 260gs. Oxford Fawsley 6th, roan (1874), by 6th Duke of Oneida (30997), dam Oxford Fawsley 3rd by Grand Duke of Kent (26289).— Mr. R. Loder, 225 gs. Lady Hudson's Duchess 4th, red (1874), by 6th Duke of Oneida (30997), dam Lady Hudson 2nd by 15th Grand Duke (21852).— Mr. J. Robinson, 85 gs. Lady Bates 2nd, rich roan (1874), by 6th Duke of Oneida (30997), dam Lily by Lord Liverpool (22168).— Dake of Devonshire, 120 gs. Fawsley 15th, red (1874), by 6th Duke of Oneida (30997), dam Fawsley 13th by Grand Duke of Oxford (28764) — Rev. W. Sneyd, 105 gs. Thorndale Duchess 2ud, red roan (1874), by 6th Duke of Oueida (30997), dam Thorndale Duchess by 12th Duke of Thorndale (26020).— Rev. W. Sneyd, 105 gs. Surprise 4th, red and white (1874), by 6th Duke of Oneida (3U997), dam Tacita 4th by 5th Duke of Wliarfedale (26033).— Mr. A. S. Hill, M.P., 100 gs. BULLS. Young Knightley, red and white (1872), by Sir Charles Knightly (27466), dam Pipalee by Bull's Run (19368).— Rev. J. Storer, 60 gs. Charming Prince, roan (1873), by Grand Duke of Kent (26289), dam Charming Maid by Lord Liverpool (22168). — Mr. Lack worthy, for New Zealand, 81 gs. Young Thorndale, red roan (1873), by Grand Duke of Kent (26289), dam Thorndale Duclies* by 12th Duke of Tiiorn- dale (26020).— Mr. Deuchfield, 65 gs. Duke of Kirkleviugton 2nd, red (1873), by Grand Duke of Kent (36289), dam Kirkleviugton 20tK by 5lh Lord Wild Eyes (20762). — Mr. Godwin, 66 gs. March Duke, red and white (1873), by Grand Duke of Kent (26289), dam Tacita 4th by 5th Dukeof Wharfedale (26033). — Mr. J. Rigg, 50 gs. Nestor, white (1873), by Grand Duke of Oxford (28764), dam Waterloo Duchess by Waterloo Duke (31077).— Mr. Bendall 26 gs. The Young Knight, white (1873), by Grand Duke of Kent (26289), dam Gionetta by Sarawak (15238).— Mr. Harvey, 51 gs. Fir»t Lord, ricli roan (1873), by 8lh Duke of Geneva (28390), dam Lady Louisa's Duchess 1st by 4th Grand Duke (19874). — Mr. Larkworthy, 210 gs. Wild Duke 2nd, white (1873), by 8th Duke of Geneva (28390), dam Wild Duchess 3rd by Lord Oxford 2nd (20215).— Mr, C. Collard, 145 gs. The Royal Prince, red (1873), by 8th Duke of Geneva (28390), dam Princess Alice by British Prince (14197).— Mr. Larkworthv, 140 gs. White Fawsley, white (1874), by 8th Dukeof Geneva (28390), dam Oxford Fawsley 2nd by Lord Oxford 2nd (20215).— Mr. A. P. Cleat, 45 gs. The i*riar, red with little white (1874), by 6th Duke of Oneida (30997), dam Countess Wateringbury 5th by Sii C. Knightley (27466).— Rev. C. Marshall, 58 gs. Caliph, rich roan (1874), by 6th Duke of Oneida (30997), dam Early Dawn by Grand Duke of Oxford (28764).— Mr. A. S. Hill, M.P., 45 gs. Summary. 28 cows averaged ^'285 15 0 £8,001 0 0 13 bulls „ 84 3 3 1,091 3 0 41 head 231 16 8 £9,095 3 0 THE RECENT SHORTHORN " SELL " IN AMERICA* — The Mr. Robbins, to whom the bull Second. Duke of Hill- hurst was knocked down at Colonel King's sale, was a short time since a clerk in the office of Mr. Strafford, the proprie- tor of 27w Shorthorn Herd-book. 150 THE PAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 'CHOICE" TABLE BUTTER, A Paper, by the Hon. Clakk King, E«ad before the Agricultural Society at Waitsfield, U.S. In order to make a choice tub of butter, at all times see that your cows are provided with the best kind of food for that purpose. lu summer, wheu your cows are at the pas- ture, let them have the best pasture you can provide. As a rule, a dry pasture which lies high and rolliug produces tiie best grasses for butter-making : it niakes ayellow, fine-grained, svveet tub of butter; while a low, swampy pasture, full of foul grass and bushes, makes a much poorer grade. Such pastures are not fit for the dairy. A moist pasture, if not too wet, may produce a good quality of grass, and in such pastures good butter can be made ; but my experience, after dealing in butter some ten years, and manufacturing butter during this time, has taught me that a dry pasture, producing sweet qua- lities of grass, is the kind for dairying. At this season of the year, when the cows are stabled, and during the spring, when the cows are giving miik, give them the very best quality of early-cut hay, and a fair amount of meal each day. Coru- raeal is the best, and any green fodder or routs wliicli are of good flavour will also be good to feed them when giving milk. Give your cows warm stables ; milk as regularly as possible; and milk clean. After the milk is drawn, set it away, after it is thoroughly strained, in a good milk-room, which must he kept sweet and clean. All odours, from what- ever source, must be avoided, as cream on the milk is tainted very easily by smoke, cookiug of various foods, odours from the sink and other places. The milk-room should lie kept at a higli temperature, for the cream to rise well, in cold wea- ther, and in warm weather kept as cool as possible. Many times the cream vvill noc half rise ou account of the extreme heat, and a good share of it is thrown to the pigs. There is no doubt but that the large patent pans now coming into use, with jjipes carrying cold water around thera, so as to cool the milk and take out the animal heat as soon as set for the cream to rise, will prove to be a great improvement. Those who have used them consider them an improvement, and say that tiiey paid fur first cost in one season. Tlie.y made good butter during the hottest weather last summer, and a gooj cream rose all through the extremely hot, damp weather. I had several dairies of butter made from those pans and the cooling apparatus the past season, which proved to be excellent. Doubtless these pans for setting milk will soon come into ge- neral use by good dairymen, as thereby a great amount of labour is saved, as well as good butter made. Always skim your milk before the cream is thinned. As a rule, skim it just before it sours, or as soon as it begins to sour on the bottom of the pan. No time can be given to skim milk after it is set which will always be reliable, as milk-rooms vary somewhat in temperature ; but never fail to skim it while it is sweet and before it becomes tainted in the least. Here is where dairymen must not neglect the care necessary for pro- ducing choice butter. Here is where many dairymen make a mistake, in letting the cream stand on the milk too long ; and the result is a common tub of butter, or even worse — i.e., a poor tub of butter, which nobody wants. After your cream is taken from the milk, churn it in good season, taking care always not to let it stand too long before churning. Use a churn with as little machinery as possible. The plain churn , with the least number of floats, is the best for manufacturing solid butter. Tvever salt your butter too much. An ounce of salt 10 one pound of butter is enough for butter made to keep through the season, while from one-half and three- quarters to one ounce is enough for the market, v/lien tlie butter is soon to be used. In fact, light-salted butter com- mands the highest price, where it is sweet and new ; and this is a fact for good dairymen to be sure to remember. The working is another very important part to be performed in the manufacture of butter. Great care must be used to work it ecough and then stop ; and to do this requires close atten- tion. Before working the butter, it should be thoroughly washed in good, pure water, until you can see that you can- not do much more to cleanse the buttermilk from the butter. As a rule, I find the finest butter where the maker works the butter twice ijeCore putting the same into the tub for market. The butter is taken from the churn and salted, aud worked enough to thoroughly work-in the salt, then set away over- night, the next morning taken up and worked until it is clear from buttermilk. Then it is ready for use — either to send to market or to keep through the season. I consider the use of a butter-worker the best mode of extracting the buttermilk, although fine butter can be made by working with the hands, if they are not so warm as to injure the grain of the butter. A sponge can be used with good success in connection with the butter-worker, to soak up the moisture in tiie process of working. After your butter is ready to pack, get a nice clean tub or box to pack it in, as a clean package is always desired by liie purchaser. Never put good butter into an old, dirty tub ; but give your butter the best tubs the market affords. It will pay well in the end, aud will be money well expended. After you have succeeded in making a choice tub of butter, it is always wanted at goed prices in the market, aud you can readily find a purchaser for all you can manufacture, from the fact that so little excellent butter is made at present. A choice tub of butter at this time is sold for 40 cents iu the market, while a good fair tub brings 35 cents per pound, and a common one 3(3, a poor one 25, and so ou, down to grease prices. A ditference of 5 cents per pound is well worth a good amount of time spent to make a choice article. As there are over 100,000 cows kept in the State of Vermont, and the annual product of the same will average 1501bs. from a cow. Or more, let us calculate tbe dilTereuce of 5 cents a pound ou the whole amount made in the slate. Reckoning ISOlbs. to the cow, 15,000,0001bs. would be manuCactured annually ; and a difference in price of 5 cents per pound would make an addition of 750,000 dollars to the annual wealth of our state — a fine increase to record in the manufac- ture of butter. If we only take as much pains in this branch of farming as we have done to improve our breeds of sheep and cattle, the thing will be done ; and wheu once done, it will pay so well, there will be no danger of a reaction, as in the sheep business, from the fact that every tub of choice butter is at all times in demand at good prices, there not being enough of such butter made at the present time for the consumer. And, to review what I have said lu detail, allow me to s;iy. Keep no poor cows, and only those that make good firm yellow butter. Keep them well both summer and winter. Use great care in cleanliness in every stage of the manufac- ture of this product. Have a good milk-room, keep it per- fectly sweet and clean, and follow the best modes of making good butter ; and if you do not succeed, then go to those who do succeed and find out their method, and iu the end you will certainly come off victorious. And now, brother-farmers and dairymen, let us all resolve to accomplish the art of making choice butter. PETERBOROUGH AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY.— The following are the chief awards : Hackuey mares or geld- ings, not exceeding 15^ hands : £7 to Mr. A. Goodman, Thorney. Weight-carrying cobs, above 13 hands 2 inches aud not exceeding 15 hands : £5 to S. Middleton, Waternew- tou. Ponies not exceeding 13^ hands : £5 to A. Leeds, Eye- bury, North. Ponies not exceeding 13j hands, to be driven : £5 to G. Gee, jun., Deeping Fen. Pat oxen : £7 to the Earl of Lonsdale, Bar|,eythorpe. Bulls, under 2 years old : £7 to the Marquis of Exeter, Burgbley Park. Cows, having had a calf: £7 to the Marquis of Exeter ; and £3 to J. J. Sharp, Broughton, Kettering, Heifers, in-calf, under 3 years old: £5 to D, Dainty, Belmistliope, Stamford. Heifers under 3 years old : £5 to J. J. Sharp. Special prize of £5 for pair of heifers under 1 year nine months, shown in classes 40 aud 41, to J. J. Sharp. Long-woolled rams : £7 to R. Wright, Nocton Heath. Boars of the large breed : £3 to H. A. Kilham, Tydd St. Mary. Boars of the small breed : £3 to H, A. Kilham. THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE, 161 MISCROPPING CASE. In the Court of Session, Edinburgh, an action was raised by Mr. Baird, of Ury and Euster Driimkilbo, against Mr. Wra. B. J\Iount, for damages for alleged niiscrop()ing of the farm of Castleton of Eassie, of wliicli tbe defendant was tenant. The defendant was bound by the lease to have tM'o-fil'ihs of the arable area of the farm in grass during the hist three of tbe nineteen years over which the lease extended. It was com- plained that there was not enough in second year's grass. In 1873 tliere were 187 acres in grass, but the greater proportion was in new grass. In other words, less than oue-fil'tli was in Becoud year's grass, though more than two-fifths were in grass. It was contended by tiie defender that tbe size of the parks did not admit of any other arrangement, and it was proved that no scouring or hungring policy tovfards tlie land had been adopted. Lord Gilford has issued the full ^interlocutor and note in the tenant's favour. The Lord Ordinary, having heard parties' procurators, and having considered the closed record, proof adduced, and whole process, assoilzies the defender from the conclusions of the action, and decerns : Pinds defender entitled to expenses, and remits the account thereof, when lodged to the auditor of Court to tax the same and to report. (Signed) Ad. Giffokd. Note. — Tiie question in tliis case is whether the pursuer is entitled to exact and tbe defender hound to pay penal, but fractional, extra rent in respect the defender has " deviated from the mode of cropping described and agreed upon" in the lease between the parties. Tbe case involves several points of tome ditricuUy and nicety. The Lord Ordinary was favoured witli an able and instruc- tive argument as to bow far fractional rent of a penal nature, such as that stipulated for in tlie present lease, was subject to equitable modification by the Court, and how far there was reason for tbe equitable interposition of tbe Court to restrict the pursuer's claim. Tbe Lord Ordinary is of opinion that if the pursuer can clearly establish the contravention or mis- cropping, the Court has no power to restrict the liquidated or fractional damages which the parties themselves have fixed and ascertained under the name of additional rent. This doctrine seems to be quite establisiied by a long series of de- cisions both in this country and in England. See tbe cases collected in Hunter on Landlord and Tenant, I. 265 (3rd Ed.). One of the leading cases is Miller )'. Lord Ewyder, 2('ith May, 1821, alfd. 11. L. 3rd March, 1820, 2 W. & S. 53 ; but there are many other cases to the same effect. The princi|)le is that where tlie parties themselves have agreed upon and liquidated the damages the Court cannot interfere to modify, for this would be setting aside the deliberate bargain of tbe parties themselves. The terms of tlie le;ise in the present case are exceedingly explicit that tbe penal rent shall not be subject to modification ; and although, notwithstanding such a clause, tbe inherent equitable power of tbe Court may net be excluded, and exceptional cases for interference may arise, tbe present does not seem one which can be made an exception from the general rule. See Forrest and Barr v. Henderson, 20th Mov., 1869, 8 Macbp. 187. But while the Lord Ordinary is of opinion that tbe fractional rent is not subject to modifi- cation by tbe Court, if it can be shown that it has been reaUy incurred, he feels that it is a demand of a highly peual nature, and great strictness must be applied in considering whether it has been really incurred or not. Tbe whole proper rent stipulated in tbe lease has been paid ; it was hardly pretended on the part of tlie pursuer that tbe defect in the amount of grass of a particular age, of which alone he com]ilaius, had led to injury anything like the penal rent claimed, and no attempt was made to prov« actual damage from deficiency of grass. In short, it was con- ceded, at least in argument, tiiat if the tenant was found liable it would be an exceedingly hard case, and no attempt was made to show that the pursuer's demand was to any ex- tent founded in equity. In such circumstances, and where the landlord's severe demand is founded on the precise words of the lease, he cannot complain of a strict interpretation as applied to that lease in ascertaining whether it supports his plea. In short, while the Court will not modify the penal rent, they will equitably consider whether penal rent at all has been incurred. Certainly, on this last point, equity is not excluded, but imperatively called for. Now, on considering the whole structure and terms of the lease, and applying them to tbe facts established in evidence, tlie Lord Ordinary has come to be of opinion, though not without dilUculty, that the pursuer has failed in sufficiently establishing " miscropping" in the fair sense of the lease, or that the defender has deviated " from the mode of cropping above described and agreed on." The lease is a long and complicated document, and it is a little difficult to read from it what in many respects were tbe precise duties of the tenant. The clause stipulating for penal lent is not confined, as the pursuer suggested, to the last three years of the lease. On the contrary, it is quite general, and applies to tbe whole currency of the lease, so that, if incurred, it might have beeu enforced tbe very first year; and it is ex- pressly stipulated that the penal rent shall be exigible at the same terras of payment as " the ordinary rent." Tlie clause for penal or fractional rent is in these terms : " And tbe said Patrick Birrell (the defender's author) binds and obliges him- self and his foresaids to labour, manure, and crop each division successively during the currency of the lease, without any departure from the rules above written ; and in case the said Patrick Birrell and Ins foresaids shall deviate from the mode of cropping above prescribed and agreed upon, either in op- position to his landlord or by his tacit consent, he shall be bound, as he hereby binds and obliges himself and iiis fore- saids, not only immediately to restore such part of the lauds as may be so miscropped to the notation aud course of cropping applicable thereto under this lease, but likewise to pay the proprietor an additional rent of £5 for every imperial acre which shall be cropped differently from the rotation above laid down," and so on. The first observation which occurs is that, although this penal clause speaks] of " rotation" and " notation above laid down," the lease does not provide any particular rotation or shift of cropping. It does not require a four-year shift, a five, six, or eight-year shift, or any other shift. The lease confines itself to specifying certain restrictions, and under these restrictions the tenant may follow any shift he pleases. Now, it is at least an awkward thing for the landlord to rely upon a penal clause providing penalty for deviation from a rotation of cropping when no particular rotation is described, Tbe next point is tliat the tenant is taken bound to crop each " division during the currency of the lease without any depar- ture from the rules above written." What is meant by "division ?" Tbe landlord says it is the set or series of fields which constitute a break, being a filth, a sixth, or other aliquot part of tbe farm. The tenant says "division" simply means field, the farm being completely divided into separate fields by permanent fences. The Lord Ordinary inclines to the tenant's view as most consistent with the restrictive structure of the lease. It is dillicnlt to suppose that " division" neans a new laying out of tlie farm into exact fifths or sixths, wliich would necessarily imply new permanent fences. Tbe skilled evidence, so far as competent, confirms the Lord Ordinary in the view that " division" simply means " field." But the main point relied upon by tbe tenant is that the farm — being a completely enclosed farm, consisting of a definite number of fields separated from each other by per- 1 nianent fences — it is not possible to lay it out into exact fourths, filths, or sixths under any of the known shifts or rotations. This really happens in every arable farm ; and when, for example, a five-sbilt is stipulated, this merely means that each field must follow tbe shift, and that the farm shall be approximately divided into fifths as nearly as the fences will allow. This is universal practice aud quite equitable ; for although tbe tenant under a five-shift may have rather more than two-fifths in white crop one year, he will have so much less the next, and so on. The present lease stipulates that there shall never be more than one-half of the farm in ciops of corn during the first sixteen years. This seems to point to a four drift rotation ; aud it is thoiigbt in equity that it would be implemented if the farm were divided into four equal breaks, as nearly the size of the fields would permit ; so that, though there might be a few acres too many for one year, there would just be so many 152 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE less the next. Now, apply this to the last three years of the lease— the only years complained of by the landlord. The landlord's complaint is thatthe tenant has not enough of grass. Two-flfths of the arable part of the farm ar<^, as nearly as possible, 166 acres, and two-fifths are required to be in two years' and one year's old grass the three last years of the "lease. The complaint is that the tenant in 1871 was nine seres short; and ia 1872, 36 acres short; and in 1873, 12 acres short of two-year-old grass, although he had in all 187 acres, being an excess of 21 acres of one-year-old grass. It seems proved in evidence that this was as near as the divisions of the fields would admit, unless, indeed, the tenant had gone back a good many years, and cultivated his farm under greater re- strictions than the lease imposes. It is proved also that there was no miscroppJDg and no scourging of any one field on the farm ; and it further appears from the evidence that, whereas the tenant was not bound to have grass more than two years old, he had, during the last three years considerable quantities of grass three and four years' old. Now, in these circum- stances, the Lord Ordinary has come to be of opinion, though he cannot say without difBculty,that there has been sub- stantial implement of the least. He cannot modify the penalty, but he can equitably consider whether any penalty has been incurred or not, according to the fair reading of the instru- ment. The skilled evidence is all one way. For example, Mr, Goodlet savs that he thinks there has been no substantial deviation from the terms of the lease, aud speaking of the last three years he says : " If you take an average of the three years, the tenant had 166 acres in such crop. He did not have it every year, but what he wanted in one year he made up for JQ another. If you go to the green crop, again, he ought to have had 83 acres each year in green crofl, but on an average of the three years he had 97 acres in green crop, so that there was an excess of li acres in green crop on the whole. That is not considered bad management. It would have been worse if it had been li acres of oats or grain crop. Again, he had in grass in three years altogetlier 160 acres each year on an average. He was "bound to have had 166 acres, so that he had a deficiency during the three years of about 18 acres. The deficiency was in grass, and the excess was in green crop ; and, according to tlie way in which he was bound to farm, the one would about make up for the other, so that practically there was no substantial injury." The other skilled witnesses speak to the same effect ; and it would be the hardest possible construction against the tenant to hold that, while, for example, in 1871 he had 102 acres in old grass, three aud four years' old, whereas he was only bound to have 83, he is to be subjected in a penal fine because he was nine acres short upon the one year's grass to make up the full quantity of 166 acres. The year 1872 is a more difficult year, for here there was a deficiency of thirty-six acres in all, although there were 93 acres of old grass instead of 83 ; but then in 1873 there was a surplus of 20 acres, so that on the whole there is only a deficiency of 6 acres per annum, and much of the grass was three and four years old, whereas the tenant was only bound to have it two. The Lord Ordinary thinks that on this point of the question he is entitled to look to substantial compliance, and if so the tenant's defence is complete. It is really vain to say that the tenant was bound to run up temporary fences and have the fields cultivated in patches. It is proved that this would have led to great embarrassment aud disconcerted the fair cul- tivation of the farm. It would have done more injury than 6 acres per annum shortcoming in grass. The total arable acreage is 415 acres. There is some force in the defender's plea founded on the discharge for rent. No doubt the laud- lord's mere silence or not stating objection would not be enough. But seeing that the penal rent is due year by year, and was not reserved when the ordinary rent was received and discharged, each discharge may fairly imply a passing from the penal claim. This defence was expressly sustained in Hunter v. Blackwood, 2nd Feb., 1854, 16 D, 441 ; but perhaps there were syecialities which may found a distinction. On the whole, the Lord Ordinary thinks that the landlord has failed to make good his claim. A. G, THE DUKE OF MARLBOROUGH'S BUCKINGHAM- SHIRE PROPERTY.— This estate, including tlie Wiuchen- don farms, was offered at the hammer in London, when it was bought in for £174,000. The ciiief bidder was Mr. Lambert, one of the members for the county. THE LONDON CATTLE MARKETS AND SLAUGS- TER HOUSES.— At a meeting of the Common Council the Lord Mayor presiding, the town clerk, Mr. Monckton, read a communication, addressed by the Lord Mayor on the 27th of June to Lady Burdett-Coutts, stating that at a recent meeting of the Common Council con- siderable discussion arose with reference to the position and prospects of Columbia Market; and after various motions had been submitted to the Court, an amend- ment was agreed to, in effect that, altiiough the Corporation has an unexpired terra of two years within which to test tlie possibility of making Columbia Market successful, yet the Court ftas of opinion that it would be unfair to every interest concerned, and, therefore, undesirable, for the Corporation to continue the present experiment without first consulting Lady Burdett-Coutts as to her wishes with reference to a transfer of the market to lier ladyship. That being the amendment car- ried, the Lord Mayor in his letter went on to state that, with the knowledge of her ladyship's many efforts to promote the well-being of the inhabitants of the East of London by means of the market, he had thought it only courteous to herself to personally be the medium of communicating that resolution to her, and to ask to be favoured vvith her ladyship's views and wislies upon the matter, rather than that it should be for- warded through the ordinary official channel. In reply to that communication, the Baroness, after acknowledging the Lord Mayor's politeness and courtesy on the occasion, said the resolution of the Common Council was conceived in the gener- ous spirit with which the Corporation, in the first instance, accepted the market. She understood from the resolution that the Corporation, prior to any further dealing with tiie market, oft'ered to restore it to her, if she desired to resume the posses- sion of it, in the hope that she might be able to carry out her original plans. Her best thanks, she said, were due both to the Lord Mayor and the Corporation for the frankness and courtesy with which they had treated her in making this offer. Inasmuch, she added, as she still iiad a great liope that she migiit be able to effect her object, she would follow the exam- ple set her by the Corporation, and frankly at once accept the offer of the Corporation to re-transfer the market to her, in order that she mi^ht make another attempt to carry out suc- cessfully her original intentions. On the motion of Mr. Rud- kin, chairman of the Markets' Committee, it was referred to that committee to make the necessary arrangements for the re-transfer of the market to Lady Burdett-Coutts. Ia relation to Farringdon Market, Mr. Rudkin asked to have the intended site of the new Farringdon Market more clearly defined than it was at present, in order to obtain the necessary plans. He added he had made the suggestion without any intention to raise a difficulty as to the reconstruc- tion of the market. Mr. Horace Jones, the City architect, undertook to give tlie necessary information. Mr. Lawley gave notice of iiis intentiou to move that the resolution as to the change of site adopted at the last Court be rescinded. On the motion of Mr. Rudkin, it was resolved that it be an in- struction to the Cattle Markets' Committee to take prompt and immediate steps to obtain from Her Majesty's Government some concession as to the power to utilise surplus space, or a rectification of charges, with a view to diminish the present heavy loss o«i the cattle markets. Mr. M'George said he en- tirely demurred to the policy as stated in the report of the Committee of letting £17,000 go to the capital accounts in relation to Deptlord Market. The .Markets' Improvement Committee submitted tiie fifth annual statement of the clerk and superintendent of the Metropolitan Meat and Poultry Market. The total revenue of the market last year amounted to £51,165, being an increase on tiiat of 1873 of £76. The amount received in 1870 was £49,850; in 1871, £50,554; and in 1872, £51,089. While the revenue showed a slight increase, arising from rental, the total amount of toll (£16,818) had been slightly less tiian that iu the previous year (£17,116), but that was probably owing to exceptional circumstances affecting the supply of meat sent to the market during the year. A sum of £8,082 had been paid during the year by the railway companies in respect of the rent of the substruc- ture of the market. The total weight of meat upon which tolls were paid last year was 151,366 tons. The country meat sent to the market amounted to 83,980 tons, and the town and foreign meat to 67,965 tons. The number of loads weighed was 91,561 ; the average quantity of meat brought into the market weekly was 2,911 tons, and daily 490 tons ; THE FARMEE'S MAGAZINE. 153 the minimum delivery in any one day was 190 tons, and the maximum, being tlie highest since the opening of tlie market, 1,095 tons. There was a balance to the good of £6,136, but tliat result was lor tlie most part due to tlie paym nt of rent after seven years' delay by the railway companies. Mr. Fricker, chairman of the Cattle Markets' Committee, brought up a report from tliem, recommeudiug that tliey should be authorised to construct from time to time, as might be reijuired, 20 additional slaugliter-houses I'pon ground on the east side of the market, in oopenhagen-fields, contiguous to the Great Morthern Railway, at an expense not exceeding £26,000, and to let tlie sHrae upon lease for 7, l4, or 21 jears, at rents varying with the size. In moving its adoption, lie said the Court would remember tliat by the Act of 1814 ail private slaughter- liouses would become illegal after the end of this year. There might be some attempt to extead the time of the operation of the Act, and also to continue, with some restrictions, private slaughter-houses in the suburban districts ; but, however that might be, there could be no doubt that the authorities would insist on their being f-losed in the crowded streets of the metropolis. There were upwards of 1,500 slaughter-houses in Loudon, but ouly 28 in the ( ity, most of which were in Highrstreet, Aldgate. He con- tended that private slaughter-houses were a nuisance, and detrimental to the public healt i, and he thought, therefore, that it behoved the Corporation to take some steps in tiie matter, and to provide snitable aocommodation for slaughter- ing in tlie vicinity of their cattle market. He then explained the plans for the construction of the slaiigliter-1 ouses, and estimated the annual income from them at nearly £2,000. Upon the motion of Mr. Bone the debate was adjourned. THE MISAPPLICATION OF POOR-LAW RELIEF. Just forty years ago there was a great reform in the adminis- tration of the English poor-law. It had been shown by a most careful investigation that the former system of administration was pernicious, that it lessened wages, that it demoralised the recipient, and that it pauperised the poor ratepayers. The time was one of sufferiu; and anxiety ; a great alarm was felt, and a vigorous struggle was made to resist the evil. And for a time the amendment was remarkable. All the worst evils were lessened aud a corresponding good produced. The authors of the, reform hoped that it would be permanent. But, unhappily, since then our prosperity has been great aud our fears have been lulled, and in consequence the worst practices of the old law have revived upon us with a rapidity and in an intensity which few are aware of. An elaborate report on the system of poor- law relief in the southern counties (by Mr. Woodhouse, a poor- law inspector) has justbeeii published by the Local Governmeut Board, aud its contents will disliearten our older readers, who remember former efforts, and who have little idea how far their beneficial results iiave passed away. The habit of very general, if not of imiiscriminate, outdoor relief — the practice formerly most condemned, and that which was thought to have least to say for itself — has ajrain fixed itself over a wide area and in great magnitude. The poor-law inspector tells us " that the workhouse," the legal alternative to illegal outdoor relief, " is no longer offered." "That the workhouse, however, is not offered so frequently as it ought to be, I am convinced not only by the statistics relating to the number of indoor and outdoor paupers, but from my own personal observation of the proceed- ings of the guardians in this respect, and from the inquiries which I have made upon tlie subject. It has been stated that the outdoor paupers throughout England are to the indoor in tlie proportion of eight to one. In many of the unions, how- ever, which I visited the preponderance of persons in receipt of out relief over those maintained in the workhouse is far greater. Thus, to take the three unions, which in the first week of February, 1871, exhibited the highest rate of pauperism in the county of Devonshire — viz., Tiverton, Axminster, aud lloniton : In the Tiverton Union at that date the percentage of pauperism upou the population according to the census of 1861, was 8-5 per cent., in Axminster 81 per cent., and in lloniton 8 2 per cent. In the Tiverton Union there were on the last day of that week 111 paupers in the workhouse and 2,511 in receipt ot out relief; in the Axmiuister Union there were 115 in the house and 1,518 receiving out relief ; and in the lloniton Union the numbers were 90 indoor, against 1,780 outdoor paupers. In the Axminster Union, therefore, less than 8 per cent, of the pauperism was at that date relieved in the workhouse, and in the Tivertou and Koniton Unions less than 5 per cent. Again, taking the expenditure in these unions for tlie year ended at Lady-day, 1869, I find that out of every £100 expended upon the relief of the poor during that year, ±'85 in the Axminster Union, £92 in the Tivertou Union, and £93 in the Honiton Union were speut upon out relief. The presump- tion raised by these statistics, that the workhouse test is not used so frequently as it ought to be, was further confirmed by my own observation and the information I received on the sub- ject, not only in the unions which I have mentioned, hut in a very large number of those which I visited. In some unions the guardians acknowledged that although relief in the work- house only was offered to persons of known bad character, ye the house was not often made use of as a test of destitution' and in many others in which the guardians professed to apply the workhouse test for this purpose it appeared to me from my own observation of the cases disposed of on the day of my visit that out. relief was granted in many cases in which the work- house might properly have been offered. At Yeovil the chair- man, who had been a guardian for thirty-four years, informed me that in the union tlie workhouse test was not applied nearly so frequently as was formerly the case. At Plymouth I ascer- tained that during the six months preceding my visit out of about 600 cases disposed of by the guardians in oc-e relief district, orders for admission into the workhouse were given in fifteen cases upon the application of the paupers, while the guardians offered the workhouse as a test in eleven otlier cases, in not one of which was it accepted." Yet the bad cousequeuces of this system are just now what they were formerly. First, it enables the worst class of employers to obtain labour at a much less price than they otherwise would. Mr. Longley, a local Government inspector, who has reported very ably on Poor- law administration in London, tells us of a case " which oc- curred in his presence." "A widow, who applied for a renewal of out-relief, stated that her occupation was to clean an office in which she lived rent free, though she received no wages for her work. The relieving othcer told the guardian?, as indeed was evident, that ' her relief paid her wages,' and that ' if it were discontinued her employer must pay her.' The relief, however, was renewed." Secondly, it reduces most the wages of the poorest and those who can least bear reduction. The same authority tells us of a case where " a chairman of a board of guardians, addressing a widow with two children applying for renewal of relief, said, 'If you can't earn enough to keep you with what we give you, you must come iuto the workhouse, ice doiCt profess to jld sheep ; as it was even said that the two Southdown judges agreed to split their differences in this way. The Hove shearling is famously furnished from his quarters down to his hock, and so good behind as to look a little weak forward, but he is a sheep which will go on ; while the Mertons are here again of the same smarter type, set-off, as some said, by a sus- picion of dark wool ; but we hate a mealy-faced South- down. The Heasman's reserve shearling took a pris^e at Reading, and Mr. Rigden's famous four-shear, the best at Bristol, was suffering much from the sting of a wasp on the ear, and so gave way to a companion, a useful ram enough, but not with the style of the old sheep. A two- shear from Sandringham reached to the reserve, and one of Mr. Fuljambe's shearlings was highly commended, but neither of these flocks showed to much advantoge : they should be smarter in their looks, air, and carriage. The Southdown judges also undertook the Hampshires as well as the Oxfords ; but beyond the three prize shear- lings, as shown by Mr. Morrison and the Messrs. Russell, there was very little merit ; whilst Mr. Saunders' two old sheep encountered no opposition, and the four pens of ewes served mainly to remind one, by way of contrast, of the beautiful pens of Hampshire and Wiltshire Downs, with which Mr. Rawlence and the late Mr. Canning would set off these classes. It says much for the school in which George Turner the younger was brought up, that he was only beaten in one class of Leicesters at Bedford, and then by his own father. In the shearlings the Thorpelauds flock took all the prizes, the first and second rams being placed again as at Bristol ; as there can, indeed, be no question as to the superiority of the first, a deep robust sheep, showing great constitution, and at the same time all the blood- like points of a true Leicester — a combination not so easily achieved, for often enough, even the show sheep are either on the one hand too fine, or, on the other, bred away into coarse crossed-looking animals. These sheep, it was satisfactory to see, were all of the same type, while in the old class the elder Turner fairly turned the tables with a compactly-framed, still more high-bred looking ram, who proved his more manifest excellences by a capital firm touch, so that Leicester mutton may still be really worth eating. Mr. Borton was not up to his previous form, or more probably the Turners were in greater force than ever, and thus the famous Yorkshire flock, now about to be dispersed, had to be content w'th such honours as second, third, or simple commendations. Over the pens of ewes, how- ever, it was quite a race with the four placed, as Mr. Turner's first are weak about their necks, and the third prize pen, also from Thorpelauds, wrong about their heads, so that either JMr. Borton or Mr. Hutchinson, with fresh judges, might have won. The Catterick ewes were, in fact, a very neat uniform lot, symmetrical in their frames, and of good thoroughbred character. But there were some curious samples of Leicesters about alike from the Midlands or further afield ; while one Yorkshire exhibitor saw his pen of ewes put aside from an artistic tendency to colouring in oils. The Royal show of Cotswolds now depends mainly for its merit on a Norfolk flock, which, however, is bred closely from the best hill-men who are well content to see themselves represented in this way. In short, as the Turners are with the Leicesters, so is Brown, of Marham, with the Cotswolds, taking all the prizes for shearlings, two for old rams, and not caring to show ewes. So uniformly good are these Norfolk — wolds that any of them are good enough to win, as we believe neither the first nor second shearlings at the Bedford Royal were ever noticed the other day in Norwich ; while the two prize old sheep in the East have now changed places. They are all of a great, grand type, with the strong recommendation of showing even better out than in, and there was nothing near them, although an up-and-down dreary-looking sheep from the Cirencester College intervened in the older class. By the way, is it not something of an anomaly that these College sheep and pigs should be continually entered and spoken to in the name of the farm manager, with no more reason to be thus paraded than that of any other farm steward ? The few pens of ewes were all moderate, the Kilkennies having lost something of their Bristol bloom. The judges of Lincolns, with only one Lincoln man amongst them, looked to go chiefly for size; at any rate their fancy in a large class of shearlings was a coarse, loose sheep of little or no style, as his main recommendations, like the bag- man's brandy and water, seemed to centre on " hot, strong, and plenty of it." StiU, it struck us that the shearlings, running them through, were but a rough lot, useful enough no doubt, and, perhaps, more true to the old original Lincoln than the finer-bred sheep seen about of late ; but some heretofore-successful flocks were put out. The first prize old sheep, Mr. Pears' four shear, also in the prize list at Hull, was of a smarter stamp, his appearance being backed by a good skin and fleece, and, indeed, the few old sheep were altogether superior to the shearlings ; while Mr. Gunnell's first pen of ewes were not well sorted, and as show sheep, for uniformity and cha- racter, Mr. Pears's third prize pen here and first prize at Doucaster looked still to have the best of it ; as one is the more inclined to say so much before a mixed bench of magistrates. One pen of ewes were here again disquali- fied, and very properly too, as wool of any growth goes a long way in judging a Lincoln. The Border Leicester, further than as a curious compound, has not much business in the Midlands, or pei'haps any- where else on this side of the Border ; although the wonder of the show was Mr. Foster's four shear, who had a class to himself, which he well filled. Of extraordinary weight, breadth, and height, this sheep is still more re- markable for his symmetry and activity ; preserving a capital frame he manages to maintain a more cheer- ful air and carriage than many a shearling ; and is in every way quite a model of a well-preserved, good-looking old gentelman. So far as the respectability of the Society is concerned, there can be no question, but the Council must take immediate and strong action over the pig show. Some of the leading exhibi- tors were disqualified, in certain cases over and over again, although it is only fair to add that neither Mr, Duckering nor Mr. Sexton were amongst these offenders, as that there was only one disqualification in the Berkshire classes. Beyond this tve may from our experience of the past assume that nothing will be done. The direction will take especial care that the names of these disqualified exhibitors shall not be published under its authority either in the Journal or elsewhere, and thus the penalty becomes little more than a farce. But we say that if the Council wishes to stand well with its members and the general public, it must institute inquiries into such matters as these : Were there pigs exhibited at Birmingham in December last at close upon six months old which were ex- hibited at Bedford last week as something over seven months old ? Was there a pig exhibited at Bristol at about eight months old which had reached to just double that age at Bedford ? Were there pigs competing, or even winning, as breeding pigs which had previously been exhibited as fat pigs ? Were pigs entered as bred by men who did not breed them ? Was the same pig entered in two classes, of course with a different age to suit either he 162 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. went for? All this and more was the common talk at Bedford, and coming as this did on numerous disqualifi- cations, we say again that the Council is bound to make the fullest inquiries, and then to publish the fullest re- ports, giving the name with every disqualified number, and the reasons for such disqualificatiou. Otherwise a lloyal pig show will become a farce and a disgrace, where the awards of judges will be systematically stultified, and anything like fair or thorougli criticism rendered im- possible. In fact, we feel very much inclined to pass the section over, and leave it to an ofHcial prize list which does not tell half the story. Every disqualifica- tion should be registered in full as religiously as every commendation. Theyoung boars of thelarge whitebreed were an indifferent lot, not excepting the winner ; but the best old pig, a very old one, was long, level, and good ; while the Messrs. Howard's pigs have gone off, carrying little coat, and in no way so kindly or taking as they have been. In the pens of three young breeding sows, three pens exhibited by very successful men were disqualified, and the prizes went anyhow. As a contemporary mildly puts it, " some of the hest lots were disqualified." What in the name of common seose does he mean by the best in a class with the age restricted to under eight months old, where pigs above that age were entered ? The all-aged old sows were good, but with some funny stories floating about as to the difference between a breeding sow and a fat sow. lu the young boai's of a small white breed two were disqualified, and possibly these were the best again I In the older class — a very good one in places — Mr. Sexton's Disturbance repeated his Hull victory, and there were a few nice pens of three ; while the older sows ran up to a smart class, marred by a disqualification, and the Duckerings getting second with a very good sow of capital quality. Over the young black boars Mr. Sexton had it pretty much to himself, nor iu the older class of boars or with the pens of young sows did the competition extend much further ; while some of the numbers were removed in the older class of black sows, and we decliue to meddle with it further. Perhaps the stewards vvill explain ? The judges went for the coarser, heavier-coated sort of Berkshires, and the best old sow looked to be something on a par with the notorious Cardiff award iu the same class, as Mr. Walker's winner here was never noticed at Bristol ; some other of the awards in the West being reversed, aud Mr. Hewer's best boar, still far away the best of his class, " unaccount- ably" put out, as, indeed, was Mr. Stewart's beautiful sow. But, as somebody says, there is nothing like changing the judges, though exhibitors may be puzzled what to go for. Good generally as were the Berkshires, the sows of a middle breed ran up to one of the best classes in the show, as it was generally commended, and where the Uuckerings won with perhaps the best pig in the show — finely-framed, with a capital top, aud of admirable quality. The heat as well as the doctor, alias the veterinary inspector, thinned out the pig show, al- though there are people still about who would dispense with the services of these inspectors, either of shearing or teething 1 And what then ? PRIZE LIST. HORSES. AGRICULTURAL HORSES. Judges. — N. G. Barthropp, Hachestou, Wickhara Market. T. Gibbous, Burnfoct-on-Esk, Cumberland. U. Lowe, Comberford, Tamworth. HU^'TERS. W. Eorster, Burradou, Morpeth. E. PaddisoD, Ingleby, Lincoln. .7. Smith, Humbeiston, Boronghbridge. HACKNEYS, COACH HORSES, PONIES, JACK.\.SSES, AND MULES. H. Beevor, Blyth, Worksop. G. Bothara, Wexham Court, Slough. J. Parrington, Brancepeth, Durham. Agricultural stallion, foaled in the year 1872 (not qualified to compete as Clydesdale or Suffolk). — First prize, £20, G. E. Daiutree, Eeiiton, Huntingdon (Grand Prince) ; second, £10, C. Golden, the Grange, Ramsey, Hunts (Champion) ; tliird, £5, T. Russell, Lower Sliuckburgh, Daventry. Reserve and highly commended: W. J. Hipwell, Station Road, Rugby. Com- mended: T. Sanders, Wilby Hall, Wellingborough (Active). Agricultural stallion, foaled before 1st January, 1872 (not qualified to compete as Clydesdale or Suffolk). — First prize, £25, T. Briggs, Babrahau, Cambridge (Heart of Oak) ; second, £15, T. Statter, Stand Hall, Manchester (Young Cliampion) ; third, £5, T. Statter (King Tom). Reserve and highly com- mended : C. Brookes, Claxby Grange, Alf'ord, Lincolnshire (Honest Tom 2nd). Commended : Rev. J. N. Micklethwaite, Taverham Hall, Norwich (Prince of Wales). Clydesdale stallion, foaled in the year 1873. — First prize. £20, R. Tweedie, The Forest, Catterick, Yorkshire (Tarn o' Shanter). Clydesdale stallion, foaled before the 1st of January, 1873. — First prize, £35, T. Tagg, NewhaU, Burton-on-Trent (Young Lofty) ; second, £15, E. and A. Stanford, EatoQS, Steyninir, Sussex ( The Duke) ; third, £5, E. Pease, Green- croft West, Darlington, Durham (Emperor). Reserve: J. F. Crowther, Knowl Grove, Mirfield, Yorkshire (Sir Roger). Sufiolk stallion, foaled in the year 1872.— First prize, £20, M. Bidden, Playford, Ipswich (The Templar) ; second, £10, R. Garrett, Carleton, Saxmundham ; third, iE5, J. Toller, Blaxhali, Wickham Market (Defendant). Reserve and highly commended : W. Byford, The Court, Glerasford, Suffolk. Highly commended : W. Toller, Gedgrave, Wickham Market. Suffolk stallion, foaled before the 1st of January, 1873. — First prize, £25, C. Frost, Wherstead, Ipswich (Cupbearer 2nd) ; second, £15, Lieut.-Col. F. M. Wilson, Stovvlangtoit Hall, Bury St. Edmunds (Heir Apparent) ; third, £5, R. Garrett (Claimant). Reserve and highly commended: W. Byford (The Statesman). Highly commended : S. Wolfon, Butley Abbey, Wickham Market, Suffolk (Royal Duke 3nd). Stallion suitable for getting hackneys. — First prize, £20, C. W. Wilson, High Park, Kendal, Westmoreland (Sir George) ; second, £10, G. A. Lepper, Aylesbury (Rapid Roan) ; thiru, £5, F. Barlow, Hasketon, Woodbridge (Presi- dent). Reserve and highly commended: F. Branwhite, Chapel Houje, Long Meltbrd, Sudbury (Defiance). Highly commended : J. Tibbett, Askham House, Doddington, Cam- bridgeshire (Cambridgeshire Cob). Thoroughbred stallion, suitable for getting hunters. — First prize, £50, Y. Barlow, Hasketon (Citadel) ; second, £25, R. Hutton, 7i, Gloucester-place, Portman-square, London (Laughing Stock); third, £10, W. Blenkiron, Middle Park, Eltliam, Kent (King John). Reserve : F. Barlow (Mas- sanissa). Agricultural mare, in foal, or with foal at foot (not qualified to compete as Clydesdale or Suffolk). — First prize, £20, C. Lister, Coleby Lodge, Lincoln (Royal Duchess) ; second, £10, F. Street, Harrowden House, Bedford (Beauty) ; third, £6, A. Tomlinson, Stenson House, Derby (Smiler). Reserve and highly commended : H. Purser, Wiliington Manor, Bedford (Honest Lass). Highly commended: J. Warth, Westmore- land House, Chatteris, Cambridgeshire (Diamond). Com- mended : W. Lavender, Biddeuham, Bedford (Young Honest Lass) ; Commended : J. and F. Howard, Park, Clapham, Bedford (Diamond). Clydesdale mare, in foal, or with foal at foot. — First prize, £20, T. Statter, Stand Hall, VVIiitefield, Manchester (Mrs. Muir) ; second, £10, Lieut. Colonel R. Loyd-Lindsay, V.C., M.P., Lockinge Park (Darling) ; third, £5, Lieut- Colonel R. Loyd-Lindsay. Reserve, W. Wilson, High Park, Kendal, Westmoreland (Highland Lassie). Suffolk Mare, iu foal, or with foal at foot. — Eirst prize, £20, H. Wolton, Newbourn Hall, Woodbridge (Pride) ; second, £10, Sir W. Throckmorton, 13art., Buckland, F'aringdon, Berks (Jolley) ; tiiird, £5, G. A. Colson, The Faye, Fiagring- hoe, Essex (Violet). Reserve and highly commended: Lient.- Colonel Wilson (Violet). THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE 163 "Mare and foal, of any breed, for agricultural purposes. — First prize, £15, G. Street, Maulden, Amptliill, Beds (Cardiff Lass) ; second, £10, Marquess of Bristol, Ickwortli Park, Bury St. Edmunds (Brisk). Reserve and highly com- mended: Marquess of Bristol (Diamond) Mare, in loal, or with loal at foot, suitalJe for breeding coach horses.— First prize, £-3U, 11. Hutton,]Gloucester-place (Pauline); third, £5, J. HorusLiy, Casilegate House, Grantham, Lincoln- shire (Lady Tichborne). Mare, in foal, or with foal at foot, suitable for breeding Hackneys.— First prize, £20, A. E. W. Darby, Little Ness, Shrewsbury (Kitty) ; second, £10, T. II. Miller, Smgleton Park, Poulton-le-Fylde, Lancashire (Mabel Gray) ; third, £5, W. C. Branford, The Heritsige, Upton, Southwell, Notts (Acherner). Reserve and highly commended : J. Warth, Westmoreland House, Cliatteris, CambridKesliire (Gentle Annie). Commended: J. Walker, Goldinglon, Bedford (Fanny). Mare, in foal, or with foal at foot, suitable for breeding Hunters. — B'irst prize, £35, E. Hornby, Flotraanby, Giuton, Yorkshire (Lady Derwent) ; second, £15, J. Moffat, Kirkiin- ton Park, Carlisle, Cumberland (Lady Line) ; third, Jtio, G. S. Smith, Stowe Farm, Stamford, Lincolnshire (The Wren). Resrve and highly commended : T. H. Miller, Singleton, Poulton-le-Fylde, Lancasiiire (Flora). Eiglily commended: B. Spraggon, Wafferton, Stocksfield-on-Tyne (.less). Yearling gelding, of any breed, for agricultural purposes. —Prize, £10, G. Hine, jun., Oakley, Bedford (Royal). Yearling cart filly, of any breed, for agricultural purposes. — First prize, £10, J. Walker, Goldington ; second, £5, U. Purser, WiUington Manor (Grand Duchess). Reserve: T. Statter, Stand Hall (Miss Honesry). Agricultural gelding (including Clydesdale and Suffolk), two years old. — First prize, £15, D. Henman, Ketnpstou, Hardwicke, Bedford (Prince) ; second, £10, F. Allwood, Wallsworth Farm, Hitcliin ; third, £5, T. Arch, Bloxwich, Walsall, Staffordshire (Sampson). Reserve and highly com- mended : F. All wood. Agricultural filly (including Clydesdale and Suffolk), two years old. — First prize, £15, T. H. Vergette, Boro' Fen, Pete-- borough (Violet) ; second, £10, W. Nix, jun.. White Hall, Soinersham, St. Ives, Hunts ; third, £5, S. Morton, Upwell, Isle of Ely, Cambs (Jewel). Reserve and highly commended: F. Street (Smart). Highly commended: J. Morton, New Bridge Farm, Stow Bardolph (Smart). Commended: E. and A. Stanford (The Belle). Suffolk fitly, two years old (County of Suff'dk prize, offered by breeders of Suffolk horses). First prize, £25, M. Biduell, ■piayford (Jewel); second, £10, W. Wilson, Baylham Hall, Ipswich (Smart). Reserve and commended: R. E. Lofft, Troston, Bury St. Edinund-s (Blossom). Agricultural gelding (including Clydesdale and Suffolk), three years old. — First prize, £15, T. Plowright, jun., The Hall, Pinchbeck, Lincolnshire (Dragon) ; second, £10, F. Cart- wright, Tlie Grove, Drakelow, Burton-on-Trent (Drayman) ; third, £5, J. and F. Howard (Roger). Reserve and highly commended : J. Bays, Chatteris, Cambridgeshire (Prince). Agricultural filly (including Clydesdale and Suffolk), three years old. — First prize, £15, T. H. Vergette, jun., Peterborough (Gipsy) ; second, £10, J. Lester, Barway,Thetford (Blossom) ; third, £5, H. Middleton, Cutteslowe, Oxford (Flower Girl). Reserve and highly commended: J. and F. Howard (Jess). Reserve: J. Toller, Blaxhall.Wickhom Market, Suffolk (Scot). Pair of agricultural horses (mares or geldings), not under four years old, used solely for agricultural purposes. — First prize, £20, J. and F. Howard (Colonel and Captain) ; second, £10, C. Howard, Biddenham, Bedford (Lion and Dodman) ; third, £5, C. W. Brierley, Rhodes House (I'he Shah and Dick). Reserve and highly commended: C. W. Brierley (Sensation and Honesty). Hunter filly, two years old. — First prize, £15, C. Hickman, Cardington, Bedford (Silver Cloud) ; second, £10, J. B. Jones, Ensdon House, Baschureh, Shrewsbury (Bessie). Reserve : E. and A. Stanford. Hunter gelding, two years old. — First prize, £15, W. Ken- ning, Braddon, Towcester, Northamptonshire (Tom King) ; second, £10, W. Richards, Ashwell, Oakham, Rutland. Reserve : T. H. Miller, Singleton Park, Poiilton-le-Fylde, Lancashire (Victor 11.) Hunter mare, three years old. — First prize, £30, T. Darrell Spickers Hill, West Ayton, Yorkshire (Ebor Witch) ; second £15, G. B. Lynes, Bedford (Honeydew) ; third, £10, E. and A. Stanford (Sabina). Hunter gelding, three years old. — First prize, £20, T. F. Jackson, Tattenhall Hall, Chester (Sober Truth); second, £15, Earl Spencer, Althorpe Park, Northampton ; third, £10, J. B. Booth, Killerby Hall, Catterick, Yorkshire (Berwick). Reserve : J. B. Booth (Baldersby). Hnuter mare, lour years old. — First prize, £30, L. T. White, Goldington ; second, £20, J. T. Mills, Clermont, Thet- ford, Norfolk (Rosebud). Hunter gelding, four years old. — First prize, £30, T. Dar- rell (Kins of Diamonds) ; second, £20, W. Wright, Wollaton, Nottingham ; third, £10, F. Barlow, Hasketon (Cornish- man). Reserve: T. H. Hutchinson, Manor House, Catteiick, Yorkshire (Breakaway). Hunter mare or gelding, five years old and upwards, up to not less than 12 stone. — First prize, £30, T. H. Hutchinson (Jester) ; second, £20, J. N. Sanders, Wollastnn, Welling- borough, Northamptonshire (Yellow Jack) ; third, £10, W. Richards, Ashwell, Oakham (Viceroy). Reserve : W. Richards (Weston). Hunter mare or gelding, five years old and upwards, up to not less than l-i stone.— First prize, £30, W. Whitehead, Wollaston, Wellingborough, Northamptonshire (Baron) ; se- cond. £20, T. Percival, Wansford, Northamptonshire (Mul- lingar); third, £10, W. Whitehead (Kn(us). Reserve: L. Croson, Lidlington, Amptliill (Young Rothschild). Hackney mare or gelding, up to not less than 12 stone. ^ First prize, £20, Majcr G. A. F. Quentiu, Woodleigh, Chel- tenham (Sparkling Moselle) ; second, £10, W. Stephenson, Cottingham, Hull (Princess) ; third, £5, W. Gilbey, Hargrave Park, Stanstead, Essex (Maud). Reserve and highly com- mended: S. Day, St. Neots, Hunts (Rockrose). Highly com- mended : W. Purser, Cople, Wood End, Bedford (Polly). Commended : W. Gilbey (Ladylike) ; B. Spraggon, Nafferton, Stocksfield-on-Tyne, Northumberland (Duchess of Tyne) ; J. llornsby, Grantham, Lincolnshire (Ballet Girl) ; J. Hall, Little Barford, St. Neots, Hunts (Colonel). Hackney mare or gelding, up to not less than 14 stone. — First prize, i;20, T. H. D. Bayly, Edwinstow House, OUer- ton, Notts (Enterprise) ; second, £10, H. Frisby, 13, James- street, Buckingham Gate, London (Filbert) : third, £5, W. Richards (Black Friar). Reserve and highly commended: J. Grout, Woodbridge, Suffolk (Kilty). Pony mare or gelding, above 13 hands 2 inches, and not exceeding 1-1 hands 2 inches. — First prize, £15, J. Higgins, Market Harborough, Leicestershire (Princess Louise) ; second, £10, H. Frisby (Princess Polo) ; third, £5, W. R. Cockle. Hillrow, Haddenliam, Cambs (Kingfisher). Reserve and highly commended: R. Weight, 72, Regent-road, Salford, Manchester (Young Apricot). Pony mare or gelding, not exceeding 13 hands 2 inches.— First prize, £15, R. L. Parker, North Kilworth, Rugby (WhirnMcal) ; second, £10, W. N. Saberton, Wilburton, Ely Cambs. (The Shah) ; third, £5, T. L. Senior, Broughton, Ayles- bury, Bucks (Fride of the Vale). Reserve and highly com- mended : C. W. Wilson, High Park, Kendal, Westmoreland (Bobby). Jackasses, not under 13 hands, for getting mules for agri- cultural purposes. — First prize, £35, C. L. Sutherland, Coombe, Croydon (Jago): second, £15, S.Lang,108, Pembroke- road, Clifton, Bristol (Lad of Poitou). Mule, not under 15 liands, for agricultural purposes. — Firs prize, £25, C. L. Sutherland, (Rousseau) ; second £15, S. Lang, (Lass of Poitou) ; third, £10, C. L. Sutherland (Blossom). Reserve: C. L. Sutherland (Robin). CATTLE. SHORTHORN'S. Judges — H. Aylmer, West Dereham Abbey, Stoke Ferry. E. Bowly, Siddington House, Cirencester. H. Smith, Eske Hall, Durham. Bull, above three years old. — First prize, £30, R, Bruce Newton-Strnthers, Forres, Morayshire (Lord Irwin) ; second, £20, Marquis of Exeter, K.G., Burghley Park, Stamford, (Telemachus) ; third, £15, A. H. Browne, Doxford, Chathill, Northumberland (Duke of Aosta) ; fourth, £10, R. Stratton, The Duffryn, Newport, Monmouthshire (Protector). Reserve and highly commended : The Earl of Lichfield, Sliugborough Hall, Stafford (Knight Templar the 3rd). Highly commended : J. W. Wilson, Ansten House, Broadway, Worcestershire (Earl of Warwickshire 3rd). The class commended. Ifri THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. Hull, above two and not exceeding three years old. — First prize, £35, W. Linton, Sheriff Hutton, York (Sir Artliur Ingram) ; second, £15, W. and H. Dudding, Panton House, Wragby, Lincolnshire (Robert Stephenson) ; third, £10, T. Statter, Stand Hall (Oxford Cheerboy) ; Iburtli, £5, T. Willis, Manor House, Caruerby, Bedale, Yorkshire (Prince of Cash- mere). Reserve and highly commended : 13. St. John A.ckars, Prinknash Park, Painswick, Gloucestershire (Cymbeline). Commended: R. Moss, Whisby, Lincoln (General Wharfdale). Yearling bull, above one and not exceeding two years old. — First prize, £25, J. Outhwaite, Baiuesse, Catterick, Yorkshire (Lord Godolphin) ; second £15, Lieut.-Colonel R. Lloyd- Liadsay, V.C, 5LP., Lockinge Park, W^antage, Berks (Prince Kuffert) ; third, £10, Emily, Lady Pigot, Branches Park, Newmarket (Rapid Rhone) ; fourth, £5, Willian G. Game, Broadmoor, Nortlileach, Gloucestershere (Aachen). Reserve and highly commended : G. J. Day, Horsford House, Norwich (Charon). Commended : A. H. Browne, Boxford, Ch.ithill, Northumberland (Rosario). Commended: T. Willis (Windsor's Crown). Bull calf, above six and not exceeding twelve mouths old. — First prize, £15, Lieut.-Colonel R. Loyd-Lindsay, V.C, M.P., (Lord Rockville) ; second, £10, J. Outhwaite (Duke of Chamburgh) ; third of £5, W. G. Game (Ranger Prince). Reserve and highly commended: C. J. Webb, Eiford, Tamworch, Staffs. (Royal Oxford Gwynne). Commended: Emily, Lady Pigot (May King) ; T. Rose Melton Magna, Wymondham, Norfolk (Bright Knight). Cow, above three years old. — First prize, £20, J. Oiith- waite (Vivandiere) ; second, £10, G. Game, Churchill Heath, Chipping Norton, Oxfordshire (iJutterfly's Duchess) ; third, £5, T. H. Hutchinsou, Catterick (Uairygirl). Reserve and highly commended: R. Stratton, Tlie Duffryn (Rosalind). Highly commended: Marquis of Exeter, K.G (Moll Gwynne). Commended : Her Majesty the Queen, Windsor Castle (Cold- cream 4th) ; E. Whitehoase, White House Farm, Kingsbury, Tamworth (Lady Margaret) ; W. Lavender, Biddenham (Lady Valentine). Heifer, in milk or in calf, not exceeding three years old. — First prize, £20, J. Outhwaite (Baroness Conyers) ; second, £15, J. Thoin, Larkhill, Chorley, Lancashire (Royal Rose) ; third, £18, Emily, Lady Pigot, (Rose of Wythara) ; fourth, £5, R. Stratton (Nectarine Bud). Reserve : W. and H. Dudding (Blooming Bride). Highly commended : Emily, Lady Pigot (Victoria Matutina) ; B. S. John Ackers (Queen of the Georgias) ; J. How, Brougliton, Huntingdon (Lady Butterfly) ; T. H. Hutchinson (L^dy Playful) ; J. A. Mum- ford, Brill House, Thame, Oxon (Edith Emily) ; C. Maguiac, Colworth, Bedford (Moss Rose IL). Yearling lieifer, above one and not exceeding two years old. — First prize, £30, Rev. R. B. Kennard, Marnhull, Blandford, Dorset (Queen Mary) ; second, £15, T. Statter, Stand Hall, (Robin's Rose) ; third, £10, Lord Suedley, Toddington, AVinch- corabe, Gloucestershire (Seraphiua Bella 3ad) ; fourth, £5, T. Statter (Robin's Stanley Rose). Reserve and highly com- mended : R. E. Oliver, Sholebroke Lodge, Towcester, North- amptonshire (Orange Chips). Highly commended : J. Down- ing, Ashfield, Fermoy, Ireland (Verbeua Royal) ; Emily, Lady Pigot (Princess of Wytham). Heifer calf, above six and under twelve months old. — First prize, £15, Lieutenant-Colonel R. Loyd-Lindsay, V.C, M.P. (Dianp.) ; second, £10, Emily, Lady Pigot (Moorish Captive) ; third, £5 R. Stratton (Regalia). Reserve and higlily com- mended : Sir T. C. Constable, Bart., Burton Constable Hull (Evelina). Highly commended: R. Lodge, The Tiiorns, Southport, Lancashire (Wild Rose 2nd). HEKEFORDS. Judges — F. Evans, Bredwardine, Hereford. S. P. Newbury, Plympton St. Mary. T. Pope, Horningshara, Warminster. Bull, above three years old. — First prize, £25, Sarah Ed- wards, Wintercott, Leominster, liererordshire (Winter de Cute) ; second, £15, T. Fenn, Stonebrook House, Ludlow, and J. llnrdiiig, The Gieeuhouse, Bridgnorth (Bachelor) ; third, £5, W. C. Davy, Horn Park, Beaminster, Dorset (Chevalier). Reserve : J. and G. Crane, Benthall, Shrewsbury (Oliver). Bull, above two and not exceeding three years old. — First prize, i,'35, W. Evans, Llandowlais, Usk, Monmouthshire (Von Mollke 2ud) ; second, £15, H. J. Bailey, Rosedale, Tenbary, Herefordshire (King of the Dale) ; third, £5, E. Lister, Cefn j IJa, Usk, Monmouthshire (Troubadour). Reserved and com- j mended : E. Lister (Black Eagle). Yearling buU, above one and not exceeding two years old, — First prize, £25, W. Taylor, Showle Court, Ledbury, Here- fordshire (Tredegar) ; second, £15, G. Child, Westonbury, Pembridge, Herefordshire (Treasure Trove) ; third, £5, H. N. Edwards, Broadward (Alfred). Reserved and highly com- mended : H. N. Edwards (Concord). Commended : J. HardiDg, The Greenhouse, Bridgnorth, Salop. Bull-calf, above six and not exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, £10, W. Tudge, Adforton, Leintwardine, Here- fordshire (Regulator) ; second, £5, T. Fenn. Reserved and commended: Sarah Edwards, (Plato). Cow, above three years old. — First prize, £20, T. Thomas, St. Hilary, Cowbridge (Rosaline) ; second, £10, R. Tanner, Frodesley, Dorrington, Salop (Lady Milton) ; third, £5, T. Thomas (Sunflower). Reserved and highly commended: Sarah Edwards (Young Mermaid 2nd). Heifer, in-milk or in-calf, not exceeding three years old.— • First prize, £15, T. Fenn (Lady Stanton). No competition. Yearling heifer, above one and not exceeding two years old. First prize, £15, P. Turner, The Leen, Pembridge, Hereford. shire (Verbena) ; second, £10, P. Turner (Isabel) ; third, £5- H.N. Edwards (Dolly). Reserved and commended : J.Hard- ing (Greenhouse Lass). Heifer calf, above six and under twelve months old. — First prize, £10, T. J. Carwardine, Stockton Bury, Leominster, Herefordshire (Helena) ; second, £5, H. N. Edwards (Gary), Reserved and highly commended : W. Taylor, Showle Court. Commended; W.Taylor. DEVONS. JuD&ES. — (As for Herefords). Bull, above three years old. — First prize, £25, W. Farthing, Stowey Court, Bridgwater, Somersetshire (Master Harry) ; second, £15, Viscount Falmouth, Tregothuan, Probus, Corn- wall (Kingcraft) ; third, £5, Mrs. Maria Langdon, Flitton Barton, North Molton, Devon (Duke of Flittou 8th). Bull, above two and not exceeding three years old. — First prize, £25, TA . Farthing (Master Robin). Yearling bull, above one and not exceeding two years old. —First prize, £25, W. Farthing (The Shah) ; second, £15, Mrs. M. Langdon (Duke of Plymouth) ; third, £5, J. Gould, Bamfylde Lodge, Exeter (Bainpf^lde). Reserved and highly commended: W. Farthing (Master Willie). Bull-calf, above six and not exceeding twelve month old.— First prize, £10, W. Farthing (Mr. Disraeli) ; second, £5, J. A. Smith, Bradford Peverell, Dorchester, (Albert Victor). Reserved and highly commended: J. A. Smith (Duke of York). Highly commended : Mrs. M. Landdon (Duke of Bedford). The class commended. Cow, above three years old. — First prize, £20, J. A. Smith (Picture) ; second, £10, T. Lee Senior, Broughton (Moss Rose) ; third, £5, W. Taylor, Glynleigh, Eastbourne, Sussex (Abbess). Reserve and highly commended, G. Turner, Bamp- ford, Speke, Exeter (Marguerite). Heifer, iu milk or in-calf, not exceeding three years old.— First prize, £15, W. Farthing, (Nellie) ; second, £10, W. Farthing (Duchess); third, £5, W. Taylor (Lady Love 3rd). Yearling heifer, above one and not exceeding two years old — First prize, £15, W. Perry, Alder, Lewdown, Devon (Camelliii) ; second, £10, Viscount Falmouth (Plymouth Queen) ; third, £5, Trevor Lee, Senior(Moss Rose 1st). Reserve and highly commended : Her Majesty the Queen (Princess Victoria Louise.) The class commended. Heifer-calf, above six and under twelve months old. — First prize, £10, T. Lee Senior (Moss Rose 2nd) ; second, £5, J. A. Smith (Picture). Reserve and highly commended J. A. Smith (Honest) ; highly commended, G. Turner (Grand Duchess Marie). The class commended. JERSEY. Judges. — J. Dumbrell, Ditchling, Hurstpierpoint. C. P. Le Cornu, La Hague Manor, Jersey. Bull above one year old. — First prize, £10, J. G. Leigh, Luton lioo, Luton Beds., (Fitz-Yankee) ; second, £5, J. C. F. Ramsden, Busbridge Hall, Goldlmiug (Surrey Modoc). Reserve and highly commended, G. Simp- son, Wray Park, llei^ate, Surrey (Prince Crocus). Highly commended, J. G. Hubbard, Addington Manor, Winslow, Bucks (Bandit), Commended, Lord Chesham, Latimer, THE PARMER'8 MAGAZINE. 165 Cliesham, Bucks (Sambo) ; W. Gilbey, Hargrave Park. Stanstcad, Essex (Ducal). Cow, above three years old. — First prize, £10, W. Gilbey (Duchess) ; second, £5, W. Gilbey (Medora). Reserve aud highly commended, Rev. Morton Shaw, Rougham Rectory, Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk, (Pansy). Highly commended, G. Simpson (Pretty Maid). Commended, W. Gilbey (Tal). Heifer, in-milk or in-calf, not exceeding three years old. — First prize, £10, J. G. Leigh (Bonny) ; second, £5, W. Gilbey (Duchy). Reserve and highly commended. Lord Braybrooke, Audley End (Flame). Commended, G. Simpson (Prettylass) ; W. Gilbey (Milkgirl). GUERNSEY. Judges. — (As for Jerseys). Bull, above one year old. — First pri^e, £10, Rev. Joshua R. Watson, La Favorita, Guernsey (Cloth of Gold) ; second, £5 Rev. Joshua R. Watson (No. 3 Cloth of Gold). Cow, above three years old. — First prize, £10, Rev. Joshua R. Watson (Portia). Heifer, in-milk or in-calf, above three years old. — First prize, £10, Rev. Joshua R. Watson (Esmeralda). SUSSEX. Judges. — H. Overman, Weasenham, Norfolk. J. Pitcher, Hailsham, Sussex. Bull, above two years old. — First prize, £20, J. Turvil!, Hartley Park Farm, Alton, Hants (Hartley) ; second, £10, G. Smith, Paddockhurst, Crawley, Sussex (Lion). Reserve : A. Agate, West Street, Horsham, Sussex (Alfred Second). Bull, above one year old. — First prize, £15, J. and A. Heas- raan, Angmering, Arundel, Susses (Bristol); second, £10, E, and A. Stanford, Ashurst, Steyning, Sussex. Cow, above three years old. — First prize, £15, J. Turvil I, Hartley Park Farm, Alton, Hampshire (CoUey) ; second, £10, A. Agate, West Street, Horsham, Sussex (Lofty). Highly commended, E. and A. Stanford (Mary Fern). Commended : P. H. Ellis, Clayton Court (Julia). Heifer, in-milk or in-calf, above two years old. — First prize, £15, A. Agate (Auburn); second, £]0, J. and A. Heasman (Marie Stuart). Highly commended: G. Smith (Pride of the Family). Commended: J. Braby, Maybanks (Lilac). NORFOLK AND SUFFOLK.. Judges. — (As for Sussex). Bull, above two years old. — First prize, £20, J. J. Colman, M.P., Carrow House, Norwich (Powell) ; second, £10, Lord Sondes, Elmham Hall, Dereham, Norfolk (The Palmer). Highly commended : T. Brown, Marham Hall (The Beau). Cora- mended : H. Birkbeck, Stoke Holy Cross, Norwich (Young Duke). Bull, above one year old. — First prize, £15, J. J. Colman, M.P. (Elmham Duke); second, £10, H. Birkbeck (Suffolk). Reserve and commended : J. J. Colman (Easton Duke). Cow, above three years old. — First prize, £15, J. J. Col- man, M.P. (E«ton Nelly) ; second, £10, Lord Sondes (Skele- ton). Reserve: Sir W. Jones, Bart., Cranraer Hall, Faken- ham, Norfolk (Cherry). Heifer, in-milk or in-calf, above two years old. — First prize, £15,LordSondes (Fanny) ; second, £10, B. Brown, Thurs- ford, Dereham, Norfolk (NopareU). Reserve and highly com- mended : H. Birkbeck (Wave). ANY OTHER BREED, Judges. — (As for Sussex). Cow of any breed, in-milk or in-calf, not eligible for entry in any Herd Book. — First prize, £15, W. Looker, Wytou Manor, Huntingdon (White Rose) ; second, £10, T. Kingsley, Boarscroft, Tring, Herts (Seraphina). Reserveand highly com- mended : T. Statter, Stand Hall, (Buttercup). Commended: T. Kingsley (Lady Knightley First). Heifer, of any breed, in-milk or in-calf, not exceeding three years old, not eligible for entry in any Herd Book, — First prize, £15, R. Stratton, the Duffryu (Brilliance) ; second, £10, W. Looker (Lottery). Reserve and highly commended : T. Kingsley (Lady Thynne Third). SHEEP. LEICESTER?. Judges. — J. Painter, Belgrave House, Nottingham. R. Salter, Lower Westcott, CuUompton. J. H. Bnrbery, Kenilworth. Shearling ram. — First prize, £20, G. Turner, juu., Thorpe- lands ; second, £10, G.Turner, jun.; third, £5, G, Turner, jun. Reserve and highly commended : J. Borton, Barton House. Commended: W. Brown, Highgate House, Holme- on- Spalding Moor; J. Borton, Barton House; G, Turner, jun. Ram of any other age. — First prize, £20, G. Turner, Bramp- ford Speke ; second, £10, G. Turner, jun.; third, £5, J. Borton, Barton House. Reserved and highly commended : J. Borton. Commended : G. Turner, jun. ; T. H. Hutchinson, Catterick; J. Borlon. Pen of five shearling ewes, of the same flock. — First prize, £15, G. Turner, jun. ; second, £10, J. Borton ; third, £5, G. Turner, jun. Reserve : T. H. Hutchinson. COTSWOLDS. Judges. — W. Game, Manor House, South Cerney, Cirencester. H. Mackinder, Langton Grange, Spilsby, R, J. Newton, Campsfield Farm, Woodstock. Shearling ram. — First prize, £20, T. Brown, Marham Hall, Downham Blarket, Norfolk ; second, £10, T. Brown ; tiiird, £5, T. Brown. Reserve and highly commended : T. Brown. Highly commended : Royal Agricultural College Farm. Commended: T. and S. G. Gillett, Kilkenny (for three sheep), T. Brown. Ram of any other age. — First prize, £20, T. Brown, Mar- sham ; second, £10, Royal Agricultural College Farm; third, £5, T. Brown. Reserve : H. E. Raynbird, Basing- stoke, Hampshire. Pen of five shearling ewes, of the same flock. — First prize, £15, Royal Agricultural College Farm; second, £10, T. and S. G. Gillett ; third, £5, T. and S. G. Gillett. Reserve : T. Thomas, St. Hilary. LINCOLNS. Judges. — (As for Cotswolds). Shearling ram. — First prize, £30, E. J. Howard, Nocton Rise ; second, £10, J. Pears, Mere, Lincoln ; third, £5, R. Wriglit, Nocton Heath. Reserved and highly commended : T. Cartwright, Dunstan Pillar, Lincoln. Commended : J, H. Caswell, Laughton, Folkingham, Lincolnshire (Profit) ; 0. Clarke, Ash by-de-la- Launde ; J. Byron, Kirkby Green, Slea- ford ; A. P. Hope, Bordlands. Ram of any other age. — First prize, £20, J. Pears ; second, £10, R. Wright, Nocton Heath, Lincoln ; third, £5, R. Wright. Reserved and highly commeded : W. and H. Dudding, Panton House. Commended : W, F. Marshall, Branston, Lincoln. Pen of five shearling ewes of the same flock. — First prize, £15, T. Gunuell, Milton, Cambridge ; second, £10, J. Byron ; third, £5, J. Pears. Reserve and highly commended : C. Clarke. BORDER LEICESTER. Judges — R, C. Chrisp, Hawkhill, Alnwick. W. C. Thomson, Dilston Haugh, Corbridge. Shearling ram. — First prize, £20, T. Foster, jun., Elling- ham ; second, £10, T. Foster, jun. ; third, £5, W. Purves, Linton Burufoot. Reserve and commended : W. Purves. Ram of any other age. — Prize, £20, T. Foster, jun. (Royal Exchange). Pen of five shearling ewes of the same flock. — First prize, £15, W. Purves ; second, £10, H. Newby-Fraser, Hay Close, Penrith, Cumberland ; third, £5, R. Tweedie, The Forest, Catterick, Yorkshire. OXFORDSHIRE DOWNS. Judges. — H. Fookes, Whitchurch, Blandford. W. Parsons, Hill Farm, Elsfield, Oxford. J. S. Turner, Chyngton, Seaford, Lewes. Shearling ram. — First prize, £20, Duke of Marlborough, Blenheim Palace; second, £10, A. F. Milton Druce, Twelve Acres, Eynshara, Oxon ; third, £5, Duke of Marlborough. Reserve and highly commended : G. Wallis, Old Shifford. Highly commended : J. Treadwell, Upper Winchendon. Commended : J. Treadwell ; F. Street, Harrowden ; C. Hobbs, Maisey Hampton ; C. Howard, Biddenham. Ram of any other age. — First prize, £20, J. Treadwell (Guildford) ; second, £10, J. Treadwell (Gillett) ; third, £5, A. F. M. Druce. Reserve and highly comuiended : C. Howard. — The class highly commended. Pen of five sliearlirg ewes of the same flock. — First prize, £15, A. i\ M. Druce ; second, £10, Duke of Marlborough , third, £5, G. Wallis. Reserve and highly commended : C. Howard. Highly commended : F. Street. SOUTHDOWN S. Judges. — (As for Oxfordshire Downs). Shearling ram. — First prize, £20, W. Rigden, Here, 166 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. "Brighton ; second, £10, Lord Walsingham, Merton Hall, Ihetford ; third, £5, Lord Walsingham. Reserve and highly commended : J. and A. Heasman, Augmering. Highly com- mended : W. Rigden; F. J. S. Foljambie, M.P., Osberton Hall, Notts. Commended : W. Rigden. Ram of any otherage. — First prize, £20, Lord Walsingham ; second, £10, W. Rigdeu ; third, £5, Sir W. Throckmorton, Bart., Buckland, Faringdon, Berkshire. Reserve and highly commended : The Prince of Wales, Sandringham. Pen of five shearling ewes, of the same flock. — First prize, £15, Lord Walsingham ; second, £10, Sir W. Throckmorton ; third, £5, J. J. Colman, M.P., Carrow. Reserve and highly commended : H. S. Waller, Farmiugton, Nortlileach, Gloucestershire. Commended : G. Smith, Paddockhurst ; Lord Sondes, Elmham. SHEOl'SHIRES. Judges. — J. Coxon, Freeford, Lichfield. J. Evans, Ufhngton, Shrewsbury. G. Cureton, Beam House, Shrewsbury. Shear]iug ram. — First prize, £20, Lord Chesliam, Latimer. Chesham, Bucks ; second, £10, T. and T. J. Mansell, Ercall Park ; third, £5, E. Crane, Slirawardine. Reserve and highly conmended : Sarah Beach. Highly commended, T. and J. Mansell ; J. Pulley, Lower Eaton, Hereford. Ram of any other age.— First prize, £20, T. and T. J. Man- sell, Adcott Hall, Baschurch, Salop ; second, E. Crane, Shra- wardine, Shrewsbury, Salop ; third, £5, l/ord Chesham. (Paddy) Reserve and highly commended: W. German, Measham Lodge, Atherst one, Derbyshire (The Ruler). Highly commended : C. W. Hamilton, Hamwood, Clonee, Meath (Bryan Born). Commended : C. W. Hamilton (Nobleman). Pen of Five Shearling Ewes, of the same Hock. — First prize, £15, Lord Chesham; second, £10, Mrs. Sarah Beach, The Hattons, Brewood, Penkridge, Statfa ; third, £5. J. Pulley, Lower Eaton, Hereford. Reserve and higiily commended : W. O. Foster, Apley Park Farm, Sbifnal, Salop. Highly com- mended : W. F. Firmstoue, Rockingham Hall, Hagley, Wor- cestershire ; W. Baker, Moor Barns, Atherstone, Warwick- shire. Commended : Mrs. Harriet Smith, New House, Sut- ton Maddock, Shifnal. UAJirSHIRE AND OTHER SHORTWOOLLED BREEDS. Shearling ram. — First prize, £20, A. Morrison, Fonthill House (UarapshireDown); second, £10, A. Morrison, (Hamp- 8 hire Down) ; third, R. and J. Russell. Uorton Kirby, Dart- f ord, Kent (Hampshire Down). Reserve and highly com- mended : R. Coles, Middleton Farm, (Hampshire Down). Commended : R. Coles, Middleton Farm, Warminster, Wilt- shire (Hampshire Down). Ram of any other age. — First prize, £20, T. C. Saunders, Watercombe (Hampshire Down) ; second prize, £10, T. C. Saunders (Hampshire Down). Pen of fiive shearliug ewes, of the same Flock. — First prize, £15, T. C. Saunders (Hampshire Down) ; second, £10, W. Parsons, Monk Sherborne, Basingstoke, (Hampshire Down) ; third, £5, J. Walter, M.P., Bearwood, Wokingham, Berkshire (Hampshire Down). Reserve, W. S. Gardner, French Hall, Moulton, Newmarket, Suffolk (Black-faced Suffolk). lONG-WOOLLED. Judges. — (As for Cotswolds). Pen of ten breeding ewes of any age, which shall have suckled lambs up to June 1st, IST'i. — First prize, £12, T. and S. G. Gillett, Kilkenny (Cotswoli) ; second, £8, T. Gunnell, Milton (Lincoln). Reserve : C. Clarke, Ashby-de-la-Launde, Sleaford, Lincolnshire (Lincoln). Pen of ten ewe lambs. — First prize, £12, F. AUwood, Wals- wortb Farm, Hitchin (Lincoln) ; second, £8, F. Ellis, Manor Farm, Chesterton, Cambridge (Long-wooUed). Pen of ten wether lambs. — No competition. SHORT-WOOLLBD. Judges. — (As for Oxfordshire Downs). Pen of five shearling wethers. — First prize, £10, C. Craw- shay, Hingham, Aitleboro', Norfolk (crossbred) ; second, £5, J. Newman, Harrowden (Improved Leicesters). Reserve : T. Gunnell (Lincoln). Pen of ten breeding ewes of any age, which shall have suckled lambs up to June 1st, 1874. — First prize, £12, Duke of Marlborough (Oxfordshire Down) ; second, £8, J. B. Jones, Ensdon House, Shrewsbury, Salop (Shropshires). Reserve: C. Howard, (Oxfordshire Downs). Pen of ten ewe lambs. — First prize, £12, T. Nock, Suttou House, Shifnal, Salop (Shropshire) ; second, £8, F. Street, (Oxfordshire Down). Reserve and highly commended : T. and T. J. Mansell (SI ropshire). Pen of ten wether limbs. — First prize, £12, J. and F. Howard (Oxfordshire Down) ; second, £8, G. Street (Oxford- shire Down). Reserve and highly commended : Lord Sondes, (Southdown). Pen of five shearling wethers. — First prize, £12, Executors of the late S. Druce, Eynsham, Oxon (Oxfordshire Down) ; second, £8, Duke of Marlborough (Oxfordshire Down). Re- serve : C. Sturgeom, South Ockendon Hall, Romford, Essex. Highly commended : G. Street (Oxfordshire Down). Com- mended : G, Smith, Paddockhurst, Crawley, Sussex (South- down). PIGS. Judges. — J. Angus, Whitefield, Morpeth. J. Lynn, Stroxton, Grantham. J. Smith, Henley-in-Arden. LARGE white. Boar, above six months and not exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, £10, Earl of Ellesmere, Worsley Hall, Manchester ; second, £5, R. E. Duckering, Northorpe, Kirton- Lindsey, Lincolnshire (lOtli Cultivator). Boar, above twelve months old. — First prize, £10, C. R. N. Beswick-Royds, Pyke House, Littleborough, Lancashire (Velocipede) ; second, £5, Earl of Ellesmere (Cultivator 9th). Reserve and highly commended: J. and F. Howard (Duke). Commended: Earl of EUesmere (Jerry). Pen of three breeding sow pigs of the same litter, above four and under eight months old. — First prize, £10, M. Walker, Stockley Park, Anslow, Burton-on-Trent, Stafford- shire (Minnie, Miua, Myra) ; second, £5, J. and F. Howard (The Three Damsels). Reserve : T. Satchwell, Hernfield House, Knowle, Warwickshire. Breeding sow. — First prize, ^10, Earl of Ellesmere; second, £5, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds (Acorn). Reserve and highly commended : J. Wheeler, Long Compton, Shipston-on-Stour, Warwickshire (Young Princess). Commended : R. E. Duckering. SMALL WHITE. Boar, above six months and not exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, £10, J. Dove, Hambrook House, Hambrook (Curly Jolly Boy) ; second, £5, Earl of Ellesmere. Reserve: G. M. Sexton, Wherstead Hall, Ipswich, Suffolk (The Czar). Boar, above twelve months old. — First prize, £10, G. M. Sexton (Disturbance) ; second, £5, C. R. N. Beswick-Royds (Cupid). Reserve and highly commended : Earl of Ellesmere (Curly Locks). Commended : R. E. Duckering (Royal Duke). Pen of three breeding sow pigs of the same litter, above four and under eight months old. — First prize, £10, Earl of Ellesmere ; second, £5, C. R. N. Beswick-Royds. Reserve and highly commended : J. Dove, (Three Princesses). Breeding sow. — First prize, £10, Earl of Ellesmere ; second, £5, R. E. Duckering. Reserve and highly commended : C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds (Venus). Highly commended: P. Eden, Cross Lane, Salford, Manchester (Rosie) ; F. W. Mey- nell, Coxbench Hall (Daisy) SMALL BLACK.. Boar, above six months and not exceeding twelve months old.— First prize, £10, G. M. Sexton (The Shah) ; second, £5, G. M. Sexton (The Ashantee). Boar above twelve montlis old. — First prize, £10, C. R. N, Beswicke-Royds (Indian Chief) ; second, £5, G. Turner, jun., Thorpelands, Northampton. Pen of three breeding sow jiigs of the same litter, above four and under eight months old). — First prize, £10, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds ; second, £5, G. M. Sexton (Truth in breed- ing)- Breeding sow. — First prize, £10, J. Wheeler, Long Comp- on (Miss Chester) ; second, £5, G. M. Sexton (Apology). Reserve and highly commended : G. M. Sexton (Coomassie). BERKSHIRE. Boar, above sis months and not exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, £10, A. Stewart, Saint Bridge Farm (Prince) ; second, £5, Royal Agricultural College Farm (Young Liverpool). Boar, above twelve months old. — First prize, £10, W. Hewer, Sevenhampton (Hector) ; second, £6, W. Hewer T^HE :parmer's magazine. 16? (Cardiff Hero). Reserve ind highly commended: H. Hum- frey, Kingston Farm, Shrivenhara (Sir D. C). Pen of three breeding sow pigs of the same litter, above four and under eight months old. — Jirst prize, i'lO, Royal Agricultural College Earm, Cirencester ; second , £5, J. Looker, Hemingford Abbots, St. Ives, Hunts. Reserve and highly commended: H. Humfrey (Nos. 454 A B C). Commended : A. C. Baily, Swindon. Breeding sow. — First prize, £10, M. Walker (Gipsy) ; second, £5, A. Stewart (Helen). Reserve and highly com- mended: Cirencester College (Sally VII.). The class com- mended. OTHER BREEDS. Boar, above six and not exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, £10, Earl of Ellesmere ; second, £5, P. Eden Cross-lane (Fire King). Reserve and highly commended: R. E. Duckering. Boar, above twelve months old. — First prize, £10, Earl of Ellesmere (Pride of Idle) ; second, £5, Earl of Ellesmere (Pretender). Reserve and higlily commended : R. E. Duckering. Pen of three breeding sow pigs of the same litter, above four and under eight months old. — First prize, £10, P. Eden ; second, £5, Earl of Ellesmere. Reserve and highly com- mended : J. Dove. The class commended. Breeding sow. — First prize, £10, R. E. Duckering; second, £5, Earl of Ellesmere. Reserve and highly commended : P. Eden (Cerito). Tiie class commended. BEDFORDSHIRE FARMS. Judges. — T. Plowright, Jun., Pinchbeck Hall, Spalding. J. Rawlence, Bnlbridge, Wilton, Salisbury. G. H. Sandy, Holme Pierrepont, Notts. First prize, a silver cup, value £50, with a purse of fifty sovereigns, given by Lord Charles J. F. Russell for the best- managed farm in the county of Bedford, R. Checkley, Brog- borough, Woburn ; second, £50, by the Royal Agri- cultural Society, T. Crouch, Boughton End Farm, Lidling- ton, Amptbill. Specially commended for gold medal, C. Howard, Biddenhara and Brorahara farms. Highly com- mended : Z. Phillips, Birchraoor, Wobura ; G. Street, Maul- den, Amptbill ; J. Lilley, Knotting Green ; U. Paine, Elms i\rm, Goldington. Commended; J. Henman, Stagsden West End ; W. Leaberry, Hill Farm, Stagsden ; J. Lester, Kempston. Inspectors of Shearing. — H. Bone, Bisterne, Ringwood. W. Jobson, Buteland, Bellingham. J. B. Workman, Ridon, Pershore. Stewards of Live Stock — R. Leeds, Castleacre, Brandon. M. W. Ridley, M.P., Blagdon, Cramlington. W. H. Wakefield, Sedgwick, Kendal. Hon. Wilbraham E^erton, M.P., 'Rostherne Manor, Knutsford. Veterinary Inspector. — Professor Brown, Royal Veterinary College. Hun. Director of the Show. — B. T. Brandreth Gibbs, Half.Moon-street, Piccadilly, London. Reeves and Germans ; and of horse-hoes the best tried were exhibited by Sainty, Priest and Woolnough, Smith (of Kettering), Carson and Toon, Tinkler, Page and Co., and Eaton and Sons. The following table shows the number of entries for trial at Bedford : THE IMPLEMENT TRIALS. THE OPENING DAY. The implements which come into competition this year are drills, horse-hoes, manure distributors, waggons, and carts ; with further prizes for shepherds' huts, sleeping vans, and thrashing-machine safety-guards. The last trials of waggons, carts, and manure distributors were at Manchester in 1869, when amongst the chief win- ners of premiums for waggons were W. Crosskill and Sons, Hayes and Son, and the Beverley Iron Works Company ; while for carts the most successful competitors were Hayes, Corbett, Crosskill, Ball and Son, Milford, and the Beveiley Company. For manure distributors James of Cheltenham and Baker of Compton took the prizes. The drills and horse-hoes would seem to have lost their turn, as they have not been on trial since the Plymouth meeting in 1865, when amongst the prize-winners for drills were Hornsby and Sons, Priest and Woolnough, Coultas, Sainty, Holmes and Son, Gower and Sons, Number for Trial. 9. 10. 11. 12. Section I. — Brills. Class. 1. General purpose drills 2. Corn drills 3. Adaptation to a corn drill for hillside de- livery •i. Corn drills for small occupations 5. Drills for turnips and other roots on the flat 6. Drills for turnips and other roots on the ridge 7. Drills for turnips and other roots on tlit ridge, without ma- nure box 8. Water Drills Drills for small seeds .. Barrows lor sowing small seeds Drill pressers Potato drills Section II. — Horse-hoes. 13. Horse-hoes for genera' purposes 14. Horse-hoes combineil with drill for small seeds 15. Single-row horse-hoe? for ridge and flat ... 16. Single-row grubbers... 17. Horse- hoes for thin ning turnips Section III — Manure (lis trihiitors. 18. Distributors for liquid manure 19. Distributors for dr\ manure Section IT''. — Waggons. 20. Pair-horse waggons ... 21. Light waggons on springs 22. Other waggons Section V. — Carts. 23. Single horse carts for general agricultural purposes 24. Harvest carts 25. Market carts on springs 26. Carts for the convey ance of water, with pump attached 27. Other carts Section VI. — Stock and Im plement Carts. 28. Low-bodied carts on springs, for convey ance of stock Lorries, or other ve hides, for the con- veyance of imple ments Carts with crank axle and low body 29. 30. 7 26 11 16 12 11 20 5 9 29 5 29 19 2t 9 10 9 4 6 21 4 10 10 15 Number Machines entered in two classes. 135 drills. 105 horse- hoes. 16 manure distributors. 19 waggons 60 carts. 14 stock and implement carts. 163 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE Number on Trial. Number in section. Sedlon ni.—MoraWe hiifs. 31. Shepherds' huts on 4. 3 15 7 huts. 15 guards to the drum of a thrashing machine. 32. Vans for men engnged in steam cultivation, Special prize. 33. Guard or applianes to the drum of a thrashing machine for preventing acci- dents to the people Total 378 371 The following is a list of the exhibitors of implements at Bedford: Affleck; Agricultural and Horticultural Co-operative Association ; Albion|Ii-on Works Company ; Allchin; Allcock; Alway aud Son; Armitage, S. C. ; Arnold aud Sons ; Ashby, Jeffery, and Luke ; Asbton ; Atmospheric Churn Company; Aveling aud Porter; Bailey Brother ; Baker and Co ; Baker, J. ; Baker, T. ; Ball ;' Ball and Son , BarforJ and Perkins ; Barford, V. ; Barnard, Bishop, and Barnard ; Barnard ; Barrows and Stewart; Barton; Bayliss, Jones, and Bayliss ; Beach and Co. ; Beare, Son, and Co. ; Belcher, Gee, and Co. ; Bell and Co. ; Bellamy ; Bentall ; Beverley Iron and Waggon Campany ; Bickerton and Sons ; Bigg ; Biphos- phated Guano Company (Limited) ; Boby ; Boultoii and Co.; Boyall; Bradford and Co.; Braggins ; Brigham and Co. ; Bristol Waggon Works Company ; Broomhall ; Brown and Co. ; Browu and j\Liy ; Burgess and Key ; Burney and Co. ; Burrell ; Cambridge and Parham ; Campion ; Carson andToone ; Canter Brothers ; Chambers, H. ; Chambers, H. ; Cheavin ; Clarke and Odling ; Clarke; Clarke ; Clay ; Clayton aud Shuttleworth ; Clemow and Co. ; Coleman and Mortou ; Coleman ; Cooch ; Cooke ; Corbett and Peele ; Corbett, S., and Son; Corcoran, Witt, and Co.; Cottam and Co.; Cottis and Sons; Cottrell and Co. ; Coulsou and Weor ; Coultas ; Coutcau; Cox ; Cranston aud Luck ; Crawley ; Crosskill and Sons; Crowley and Co. ; Crump ; Davies ; Davis and Co. ; Davey, Paxman, and Co. ; Day and Sons ; Day, Son, and Hewitt ; De Leon and Co. ; Dean ; Denue aud Son ; Dell and Sou, Dening aud Co.; Dennis and Co.; Denton; Dodge and Co.; Dodman ; Down aud Co.; Driffield Linseed Cake Company; Duffield , Eagles; Eastwood ; Edgiugtou and Co. ; Edgiuton and Co. ; Edlington ; EUiman and Co. ; Fairbanks and Co. ; Farmers' Supply Association; Eaulks ; Fisken ; Fison ; Follows and Bate ; Foster aud Co. ; Fowler, J., and Co. ; Gardner ; Garrett aud Sons ; Gatward : Gibbons ; Gibbs and Co. ; Gibson ; Gilbert ; Gillitt ; Glover and Sons ; Gooday ; Gold Brothers ; Gower and Son (Winchfield) ; Gower and Son (Market Drayton) ; Grant ; Green aud Sons; Guest; Hall and Co ; Hall; Hamilton and Co. ; Hamilton, Woods, and Co. ; Hancock, H., and Co. ; Hancock, J. L., and Co. ; Harrison McGregor Co. ; Harrison ; Hart and Co. ; Hartley and Sugden ; Hayes and Son; Hayes; Haynes and Sons; Hayward, Tyler and Co. ; Head, Wrightson, aud Co. ; Headly and Son ; Heard; Hempsted and Co. ; Hepburn and Sons ; Heron, Gresham, and Craven ; Hill and Smith ; Holliugs, Brothers ; Holmes and Sous ; Hope ; Hopperton ; Horley ; Hornsby, R., and Sons ; Howard, J. ; Howard, J. aud F. ; Howes and Sons; Hughes; Humphries; Hunt aud Tawell ; Hunter ; Hydes aud Wigfull ; lies ; Ingold ; Inmau ; Inwood ; James and Son ; Johnston Harvester Co. ; Jones, J. M. ; Jordan, E. ; Kearsley, H. and G. ; Kell ; Kennau and Sons ; Key worth and Co. ; Kilpiu aud Billson ; King, W. ; Kittmer, B. ; Koppel, L. ; Larkworthy and Co. ; Laughlaud and Co. ; Le Butt. J.; Le Grand, A.; Lewis and Son : Lillie and Elder ; London, Provincial, and Foreigu-Sanitary Co. ; Lyon, A. ; Main and Co. ; Maldon Iron Works Co. ; Marsden; Marshall, Sons and Co. ; Marston and Co.; Massey and Hill ; Matthews, J. ; Matthews, Son, and Co. ; Mattison, W. ; May and Mountain ; Maynaid, R. ; Maythorn, J. ; M'Kenzie and Sons ; Mellard's Trent Foundry ; Milburn and Co. ; Milford and Son ; Milford, Frank P. ; Mills and Co. ; Mitchell and Co. ; Moore and Co. ; Morgan and Co. ; Morris and Griffiu ; Mortlock ; Morton, Francis, and Co. ; Moser ; Mote, F. ; Moule's Earth Closet Co. ; Moulton, E. L. ; Murray and Co. ; Murton and Turner ; Musgrave and Co. ; Nalder and Nalder ; Negus ; Newton, Chambers, and Co.; Nichol- son and Son ; Nickerson ; Nock ; Norris and Co. ; Ohlendorff and Co. ; Oldham and Booth ; Osborue and Co. ; Packard and Co. ; Page and Co. ; Page and Girling ; Parham ; Parker ; Payne and Sun ; Pearce, C. ; Peirce, A. C. ; Penney and Co. ; Perkins and Co. ; Phillips-Smith and Co.; Pickering; Picksley, Sims, aud Co. ; Pinfold ; Ponis and Co. ; Priest, Wooluough, and Michell ; Pyke ; Rainforth and Son ; Randell ; Ran- some, S. and E., and Co.; Ransomes, Sims, and Head; Ravensthorpe Engineering Company ; Raywood ; Reading Ironworks ; Reeves and Son ; Reid and Co. ; Reudle ; Reynolds and Co.; Riband Telegraph Post Company; Richards ; Riches and Watts , Richmond and Chandler ; Roberts ; Robey and Co. ; Robinson and Richardson ; Rjdway ; Rollins and Co. ; Russell and Co. ; Ruston, Proctor, and Co. ; Samuelson aud Co. ; Sawney ; SchnfTer and Budenburg ; Sears and Co. ; Sharman and Ladbury ; Sheath ; Sherwood ; Silvester ; Simpson and Co. ; Smith and Grace ; Smith, R., and Co. ; Smith, W. ; Smyth and Sons ; Snowden ; Spong aud Co. ; Staniland; Staynes& Sons; Stone; St.Pancras Iron Work Co.; Summerscales aud Sons ; Sutton and Sons; Symonds; Tangye and Holman ; Tasker aud Sons ; Taylor's Sewiug Machine Co. ; Thomas and Taylor ; Thorn ; Thorough Washing Machine Co.; Thwaites and Carbutt ; Tipper; Tomlinson, Hayward, and Bishop ; Tucker ; Turner ; Underbill ; Unite ; Vipan and Headly ; Waide ; Walker and Son ; Walker, Fyfe, aud Co. ; Wallis and Steevens ; Walworth and Co. ; Wandley and Robb ; Ward and Silver ; Warsop and Hill ; Watson ; Watts and Co. ; Webb and Sou ; Weighill ; Weir ; Welland Vale Co. ; Wheeler and Son ; Wheeler and Wilson ; White and Co.; Whitehead and Co.; Whitehouse; Wilkerson ; Willacy ; Williams and Co. ; Williams ; Williams, Jones, and Co. ; Williamson ; Windover ; Wood ; Woods, Cocksedge, and Co. ; Wray ; Wright, H. ; Wright and Co. ; Wright. W. T. ; Wurr and Lewis ; Zimdars. THE TRIAL WEEK. The implement trials this year have been carried out under great personal inconvenience to the judges, exhi- bitors, and all concerned, from the intense heat of the weather, and the parched and dry nature of the ground, owing to the continued want of rain. The trial- fields were, however, conveniently chosen, some close to the show-yard and the others at no great distance; but marching over the ground was like walking on pebbles and the intense direct rays of the sun, with but seldom a breath of air, made the long day's labours scarcely bear- able. The judges, however, stuck to their work un- flinchingly from early morning to almost dusk — a measure THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE, 169 absolutely requisite to get through the numerous imple- ments and vehicles submitted for trial, which num- bered nearly four hundred. The fields selected were, for the trials of drills, two fields near the show-yard ; and for the horse-hoes, two others reaching towards Elstow. The backward state of the turnip crop threw a difficulty in the way of the Society in obtaining a suitable plot for trial of turnip-thinuers, as the plants in the field originally selected w^ere not sufficiently forward ; but arranirements were made with Mr. Poole for one of his fields better circumstanced, although by no means in a satisfactory condition for a good trial. The exhibition of implements coming on for competition this year is large, may be thus summarised : Drills of various kinds 229 Horse-hoes and grubbers 45 Manure distributors 6 Carts and waggons 209 Movable huts 8 The trials of the general-purpose drills were limilcd to five makers, and did not give much trouble. The corn drills, however, in class 2 were very numerous, and occupied the judges several days in coming to a determination, after repeated trials and the free use of the dynamometer. The drills ranged in price from £19 up to £36 — the charge for a Canandian patent made by Hollings Brothers, of Swindon. The trials of these were watched with great interest, although the work of burying the seed was performed under difficulties, but the poor judges, who had to follow the course of the implements over the hard knobbly clayey soil, were to be pitied ; they get through their work, however, on Thursday, and were able to announce their decision on Friday. By far the greater number of the seed drills work in the old-fashioned way — the corn, or turnips, or mangold seed being lifted in little cups, get round a disc, on short arms, the seed being spilled over from the highest point into two funnels, one at each side of the disc, and so conveyed to the land behind the coulters, which open the furrows. Many of the machines combine a manure with a seed-box ; and several different devices are used for inducing guano and superphosphate to flow through a comparatively small aperture and fall down a spout in advance of the seed. The machines were tried, not with real manure, but with coal dust, which answers pretty well. A somewhat startling fact has already been arrived at, namely, that machines by good makers in the best adjustment will sow 7 oz. of seed in one drill while going a given distance, and perhaps 9 oz. in the next drill ; this was discovered by the simple expedient of fastening small bags over the delivery spouts, so that the seed went into the bags and was weighed, instead of going into the ground and being covered up out of sight. This is a matter of the utmost importance, as too much care cannot be taken to distribute seed evenly. A great defect in all drills constructed on what may be termed the "Persian wheel" system, is that if the horses stop the seed falls out of the cups, and when they go on again the machine must move a foot or two before more seed can be picked up and brought to the top of the wheel. The feeding discs run slowly, and they must make half a revolution before they begin to sow again after a stoppage. This is not the case with various other systems of construction which appears to possess general advantages over the Persian wheel arrangement, although the latter is the most popular with agricultural implement makers at present. The trials in class 3 for the best adaptation of a corn drill for hill-side delivery were made on Thursday, and there were eleven entries, only one maker sending two implements. The corn drills for small occupations, class 4, were also tried on Thursday. The range of price for these implements varied between the extremes of £14 and £81. There were fifteen separate makers entered. The drills for turnips and other roots on the flat, class 5, were tested in the field near the show-yard on Monday, and the trials completed of the twelve entries, so as to enable the judges to determine their awards on the following day. Nineteen makers competed, and there were twelve entries in the class. The competitions in classes 6 and 7 — drills for turnips and other roots on the ridge, with or without manure — were carried on in the fields at Elstow. In the first class there were eleven entries, and in the second twenty. The prices of these implements made by various makers vary widely. Those iu class 6 range between the two ex- tremes of £0 10s. and £20, and in class 7 from £5 5s. to £11 lis. The water-drills tried in class 8 were very few, there being only five entries, and one maker sent two. The range of price of these implements was also wide, being between £25 and £41. Class 9, drills for small seeds, included some cheap and useful implements ; indeed, some very low priced. The barrows for sowing small seeds, class 10, also contained some useful articles. Only three drill pressers, class 11, competed, and there were but six potato-drills tried. One or two of these are well known ; but there was also a novelty in a French implement, shown by a M. Couteau. It consists of a travelling hopper, delivering potatoes of any size at distances varying at will, from 12 to 28 inches. A row is planted at a time, and the seed covered as deposited. The drill, 9 feet long and 4 feet wide, is worked by one horse. Bickerton and Sons', of Berwick, is constructed iu toothed sections, and is only £8. Wright's machine, made by Coultas, of Grantham, plants, manures, and covers up two rows at one opera- tion. The price is £31, a little more than the French implement. Murray's is £16, while Corbett and Peele supply one at £20, and that of Coultas is sold at £45. The largest exhibitors of drills of various kinds for trial iu the several classes were Messrs. Gower and Son, 28 ; T. Harrison, 10 ; J. Coultas, 10 ; Holmes and Son, and Corbett and Peele, 8 each ; Kainforth and Sons, 6 ; Murton and Turner, and Uuderhill, 5 each ; Dening and Co., J, F. Clemow and Co., Walker and Son, G. W. Murray, and Kell, 3 each. On Tuesday Messrs. J, and I\ Howard commenced cutting a fine field of rye, near the road, with some of their reaping machines, and on Friday and Saturday they had several sets of their newest steam-cultivating appa- ratus at work in fields near the show-yard. Their iron works and farms were also thrown open to visitors. Messrs. Barford and Perkins also exhibited on Wed- nesday two sets of their steam ploughing and cultivating tackle at work on strong land, half a mile from the show-yard, in the occupation of Mr. Risely, of Elstow. One set was driven by au ordinary 8-horse power port- able engine, and the other. Savage's patent, on an en- tirely new plan, by a traction engine, the hind wheels of which are converted into winding drums, thus dispensing- with the ordinary windlass, and two men can strip the wheels in half-an-hour. On Tuesday the judges were occupied all the morning with the trials of class 7, small ridge drills with manure. In the afternoon they took up and finished class 6, then commenced with class 15, single row horse hoes for ridge and flat, which was resumed at 9 o'clock on Wed- nesday morning. On Thursday morning the judges proceeded with the trials of horse-hoes for general purposes, and those com- bined with drills for small seeds, and those for thinning turnips, in Mr. Prole's fields, at Elstow. At 8 o'clock the corn drills trials were resumed, the following imple- 1:0 TSE I^AU^iEH'S MAGA2[Nfi. ments being tale porters, and a five-tined cultivator. Head, Wrightson, and Co., of Stockton-on-Tees, exhibited several of Moore's patent pulley blocks, of 10 to 40 cwt., and some of their hand hoists with brake, to enable one man to lift heavy weights with ease. Hempsted and Co., Grantham, had on their stand an eight-horsepower driving and finishing thrashing machine, also a straw elevator and stacker, and swivel drills. Hill and Smith, Bricrley Hill, entered a couple of horse hoes and a grubber for trial, and had a display of gates and fencing. Holmes and Sons, of Norwich, had a fine collection of drills, horse hoes, and manure distributors. They carrijed off the second prize in the trials for general purpose THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 177 drills, and their turnip thinner was highly commended by the judges after trial. R. Ilornsby and Sons, of Grantham, had two of their engines at work driving their famous thrashing machines. By improved arrangements the whole of the machinery is driven with very few belts and without gearing. They also exhibited several mowers and reapers, and these are now constructed so as with ordinary management to be entirely free from breakages. Their self-rakers have all the latest improvements. Of their new patent double- furrow ploughs several were shown. These are con- structed on principles differing materially from anything before known, and the important improvements intro- duced appear to be a great advance over those generally in use. J. and F. Howard, being on their own ground, made an enormous display of machines and implements : not only were two entire sheds in the show-yard filled, but the fields and yards adjoining their works were filled with specimens of their implements ; but they had at work, as we stated in our last, their reaping machines cutting rye, and their steam ploughs turning up the soil afterwards, for the information of visitors passing to and from the show-yard. The Howards manufacture four kinds of ma- chinery for steam cultivating. The first kind is that which they have made for so many years, consisting of a detached windlass and tackle on the stationary system, which can be worked by an ordinary portable or traction engine of ten or twelve horse-power. This apparatus requires one engine-driver, two anchor-men, a ploughman, and two rope-porter lads. The second arrangement consists of an ordinary traction or portable engine, with a new patent self-coiling windlass and self-moving anchors. This apparatus has the advantages peculiar to the stationary system, but the labour and expense of working are re- duced. The men required are one engine-driver, a plough- man, and two rope-porter lads. The third consists of two ploughing or traction engines, with a winding barrel to each, working along opposite headlands, and drawing a plough, cultivator, or other implement from one engine to the other alternately. This arrangement is worked with two enginemen, a ploughman, and one or two rope- porter lads. One of the novelties shown was an arrange- ment of windlass constructed so that it can be attached behind the portable engine by which it is driven, the power being communicated by a belt. The firm also show one of their self-coiling windlasses, in which ihe drums have a traverse motion on their shaft, so as to ensure the rope coiling properly. One of the most interesting novelties they have introduced is a balance plough for horses, in- tended to turn the furrow always the same way. It is an ordinary steam plough in miniature, and has been specially designed for use in Kent. Another substantial improve- ment is a new folding reaper with self-acting rakes. Hitherto it has been a troublesome job to get the self- rakers along a road, owing to the great width occupied ; but in this new machine the whole delivery platform, rakes and all, can be turned up without trouble and secured by a couple of bolts, so that the machine can traverse the narrowest roads, and yet can be put to work in a very few minutes. Howes and Sons, of Norwich, exhibited a market or baggage cart, which has received many first-class prizes, besides other carts and cars, A. Hughes, of Market Harborough, exhibited several of his patent laid corn lifters, which can be applied to any reaping machine, self rakers or hand delivery by the drivers in the field, and adjusted to the nature of the ground, or the condition of the crop, 1). Humphries, Persliore, had in the machinery in luotlou dejiartmeut several single and double blast thrash- ing machines, and a portable elevator, Hunt and Tawell, Earl's Colne, besides many sets of horse gears, had a varied assortment of machines, mills, pulpers, and other implements. T. Hunter, Maybole, had a number of horse hoes, potato diggers, and other implements. T. W. Inwood, St. Albans, had on his stand an agri- cultural one-horse cart, market car, and other vehicles. James and Son, of Chilton, have made a good display of water carts and manure distributors, pumps, &c. H. and G. Kearsley, Ripon, showed several mowers and reapers of their manufacture. S. A. and H. Kell, Gloucester, in their exhibits re- stricted themselves chiefly to corn drills. Several of their implements were entered for trial. Kennan and Sons, of Dublin, confined themselves to their Clydone horse hoe of several patterns for thinning turnips. B. Kittmer, of Louth, had three corn dressing and blowing machines, and an elevator for bagging the corn from the machine. J. L. Lark worthy and Co., Worcester, had a variety of ploughs, harrows, and other useful implements, but calling for no special notice. Laughland and Co., Warrington, showed a hand press for baling hay, straw, and esparto grass, and a machine for weighing the bales. Josiah Le Butt, Bury St. Edmunds, exhibited a num- ber of his corn screens, malt screen, and malt plough, and a hand seed drill. Lewis and Son, Kettering, besides a corn drill for small occupations, showed several horse lioes, none of which was uommended. They also received from the Miscellaneous judges a silver medal for a cheap sack lifter, with which a strong lad (not able to lift or carry a sack of corn) can shoot sacks of corn at the rate of 12 or 15 qrs. per hour without any assistance, thereby saving the labour of two men, and doing the work without waste. Lillie and Elder, Berwick-on-Tweed, exhibited a corn drill and turnip-sowing machine, one or two reapers and mowers, and two carts. The Maldon Ironworks Company had several sets of horse gears, a mangel plough, chaff cutters, and disc papers. This company lately received the silver medal at Bremen for their food-preparing machinery. Marshall, Sons, and Co., Gainsborough, made, as usual, a fine display of their engines, having no less than six on their stand, working thrashing machines and straw elevators. Wm. Mattieson, Bedale, had three of his improved Yorkshire Champion reaping machines. R, Maynard, Whittlesford, had a miscellaneous assort- ment of elevators, drills, horse-hoes, &c. Mellard's Trent Foundry, Rugeley, had a very large collection of chaff-cutters, revolviug mould-board ploughs, and a 3-tined grubber, which carried off the £5 prize in competition. Milford and Son, of CuUomptou, were very successful in their display of carts and waggons, carrying off the first prize of £15 and a high commendation. F. P, Milford, of Kenn, near Exeter, also had a fine display of carts and waggons, receiving from the judges a £10 prize for a harvest cart, a £5 prize for a general purpose cart, and a commendation for a pair-horse waggon. - ,, • Mills and Co., Wellingborough, had several oi their registered chaft"- cutters and some cheese presses. Morris and Griffin, of Wolverhampton, hal an excel- lent display of the various artificial manures in the manu- facture of which they are so largely engaged. Murray and Co., Banff, entered, as we stated in our last, several new itupleiuenta for trial, and carried off the £5 prize for ridge turnip-sowing inachines. The delivery 178 THE FARMEE'S MAGAZINE. is regular and certain in all descriptions of land, the cups in the brass delivery-disc never failing to fill ercnly. Their tiny thrashing machines are most efficient. The con- struction is quite new, the thrashing, shaking, and dressing being put in a very compact form. Murton and Turner, of Thetford, exhibited several corn drills and horse-hoes for general purposes and for turnip thinning. The Ravensthorpe Engineering Company exhibit a 3-furrow balance plough, and a 5-tine turning cultivator on a new principle. The chief peculiarity of the plough is in the frame, which is composed of three parallel bars of Bessemer steel running from extreme end to end, swelled in the middle and bent to the proper angle. These frame bars are set to a proper width to turn a furrovv ten inches wide, and they are strongly stayed and braced to one another by wrought-iron staysing placed in each case so as to relieve the frame of the twisted strain imparted by the skife coming in contact with impediments, such as stones or roots. The cultivator exhibited by this company is the invention of Mr. James Backhouse, and has been produced to meet a want long felt by owners of steam ploughing tackle (especially on the roundabout system) for an effective implement, to turn round at the headlands, and which, while being strong enough for moderate heavy work, shall be light enough for their small engines. Nalder and Nalder, Limited, Wantage, had three of their finishing thrashing machiues, drawn by some of Brown and May's engines. W. N. Nicholson and Son, Newark, made a display of their haymakers and patent horse rakes, root-cutting pulpers, and other machines, and had six small power engines. The judges awarded this firm a silver medal for their combined self-acting and manual delivery rake. Inquiries for the future will doubtless be for self-acting rakes. They are labour- saving appliances that must follow in the wake of self- raking reapers. Oldham and Booth, Kingston-on-HuU, had two bone- crushing machines, worked by one of Robey's 8-horse engines. D. M. Osborne and Co., Liverpool, had three of their American Kirby combined mowers and reapers, and a Burdick independent reaper. E. Page and Co., ]5edford, had on their stand a large collection of implements of their own manufacture, and by other makers. Page and Girling, "VVoodbridge, besides some carts and waggons, had several of Edward's improved drop drills or planting machines. The patent in these drills, for setting various seeds, consists in an arrangement whereby the seeds are deposited separately, and at e'lual distances apart. Payne and Son, of Thrapston, exhibited a powerful 12- horse portable engine, suitable for contractors, and 4- horse combined vertical engine and boiler. Penney and Co., Lincolu, made a good display of their corn and manure screens. Perkins and Co., llitchin, exhibited a couple of horse hoes and turnip thinners, some field rollers, harrows, and combined stacking machines. Picksley, Sims, and Co., Limited, Leigh, had on their tand many examples of horse rakes, food-preparing machiues, and mowers. Their new patent balance com- bined 2-horse mower and reaper carried ofi' several prizes last year, and the gold medal at the United East Lothian Society, this month. Priest, Woolnough, and Michell, Kingston, had several corn manure drills and hoise hoes, for which they have obtained some deserved celebritv. W. Rainforth and Son, Lincoln. — The exhibits of thi* firm consistel chiefiy of drills and screens. F. and II. Ilandell, North Walsham, exhibited new patent double furrow plough, some liquid manure carts, and a turnip drill. S. and E. Ransome, London, had a new form of shears, which any lad can use. Ransomes, Sims, and Head, Ipswich, made an immense display of their ploughs and horse rakes. They had two single blast and two double blast thrashing machines driven by four of their portable engines. One of these fitted with Head and Schmidt's patent straw-burning apparatus received the silver medal at this sbow from the Miscellaneous judges. This is an application which is calculated to be very useful on the Continent and in the colonies, where other fuel is scarce, but where there is au abundance of rough vegetable matter available — reeds, cotton stems, maize and sorghum stalks, sugar cane trash, small branches of trees, furze, mustard and flax stalks, are all readily consumed if dry. Its application with straw was shown on engines by Clayton and Shuttle- worth, Ruston and Proctor, and others. The new turnip hoe of this firm we alluded to last week, and with some more attention given to it in the way of improvement it may become a useful instrument. The Reading Iron Works, Limited, had a number of their excellent steam engines working thrashing machines. These have received prizes at nearly all the Society's shows, and the grand prize at the Vienna Exhibition. At the Bedford meeting the judges gave the prize — a silver medal — for their nozzle boiler, which promises to be one of the most economical steam generators yet brought out. The tube chamber is square, and traversed by rows of tubes set horizontally at right angles to each other. At the end of these tubes are fixed cast nozzles, or circulators, the action being that as soon as the steam is quenched, it readily and necessarily passes off at the turned-up nozzles, the water rushing in at the turned-down nozzles to supply its place. II. and J. Reeves and Son,Westburj, are most successful in the appreciation of their exhibits, especially drills and manure distributors. They received three £10 prizes, two £5 prizes, and two commendations. B. Reid and Co., Aberdeen, had a great many of their disc corn and seed drills, horse hoes and other implements, for which they received the progress medal at the Vienna Exhibition. Riches and Watts, Norwich, exhibited several steam engines, driving grist mills, and a new simple and efiieieat revolving gathering rake. E. R. and E. Turner, of Ipswich, as usual, made a good display of their specialities, such as corn and seed crushers, from the smallest size suited for one-horse up to those requiring steam power, and capable of delivering a large quantity per hour. Grinding mills, with French stones ; horse gears and oilcake breakers ; one of their 8-horse power patent automatic variable expansion port- able engines was driving a suitable thrashing machine. Another speciality of this firm is their small-sized thrashing sets, one of which of 5-horse power was also shown in motion. In hilly districts, and where farms are small, these machines are specially valuable — in fact, they may be used where, from their great weight, larger machines could not be transported from place to place. Richmond and Chandler, Salford, made a fine exhibit of their chaifcutters, some of which were driven by one of Clayton and Shnttleworth's 4-horse engines. They had also several sets of horse gear, root washers, and turnip cutters. Their machine for cutting up straw into lengths for bedding is worth mention- Last year alone this firm carried off about two dozen prizes with their implemeiits at home and abroad. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 179 E. and H. Roberts, Stony Stratford, exhibited three of their straw elevators and corn stacifers, which deliver at heights from 26 to 32 feet, and are easily worked by a pony. This machine received the silver medal of the Northampton Society last year. Robey and Co., Lincoln, had four of their excellent en- gines working thrashing machines, mills, and straw elevators. .J. G. Rollins, London, had on his stand one of Hollings- worth's American horse rakes, specimens of hay and ma- nure forks, hatchets, pumps, and some of Clinton's American corn shellers, which will shell from 10 to 15 bushels of Indian corn per hour. Rustou, Proctor, and Co. had six of their steam en- gines running, from 2V to 10-horse power, driving thrashing machines, grinding mills, and straw elevators. Samuelson and Co, Banbury, exhibited seven reapers of various kinds, two combined reapers and mowers, and several turnip cutters. J. N. Sears and Co., London, had at this meeting several American novelties, such as a millstone dressing machine, a qran duster for dressing the ofFal after leaving the silks, a model of an adjustable grain elevator, for lifting bulk grain in quantities ranging from 30 to 100 quartars or more per hour. ; an American turbine water wheel, and one of their aspirators to clean corn. Sharman and Ladbury, Melton Mowbray, exhibited several drag harrows and rakes, and some registered poultry houses and dog kennels. Smith and Grace, Thrapston, had on their stand many chaff-cutters and other food-preparing implements, besides S3veral excellent general-purpose steerage horse hoes, one of which on trial carried off the first prize of £10 at the meeting, and also a silver medal at the Derby- shire Society last year. W. Smith, of Kettering, is not only famous for his horse hoes, one of which, a combined, was commended on trial, and he received a silver medal for it last year at the Northampton Agricultural Society's show, but in the turnip thinning trials his implements carried all before Ihem, receiving both prizes and a high commendation. J. Smyth and Sons, Peasenhall, showed a number of their Eclipse and Suffolk drills, but did not compete in the field trials. J. D. Snowden, Doncaster, had a number of ploughs, one a new improved light-land double- furrow plough; for his two-coulter ridge drill he carried ofi^ the £10 prize of the Society ; and his improved self-expanding horse hoe was also commended on trial. J. S. Stone, of Newport, had a waggon and several carts entered for competition. Tangye, Brothers, and Holman, of London, had two of their high-pressure steam engines and several of their steam pumps and hydraulic jacks. "\V. Tasker and Sons, Andover, exhibited two of their engines driving thrashing and winnowing machines, some elevators and rickers, and liquid manure distributors. Thomas and Taylor, of Stockport, had a fine collection of eccentric churns, and several of them were purchased by the Crown Princess of Prussia at her visit on the first day of the show. W. S. Underbill, Newport, Salop, exhibited two portable engines, a thrashing machine, several double- furrow ploughs, horse hoes, grubbers, harrows, and turnip drills, and some ridging ploughs. John Unite, of Paddington, who supplies the Society with the covering for the shedding, exhibited rick and cart cloths, horsecloths, tents, and a variety of other useful articles. Vipan and Headly, Leicester, besides a large miscel- laneous collection, exhibited several ploughs and harrows and carts. They carried off the £5 prize for a single row horse hoe, aud high commendation for a general parpose steerage horse hoe. W. Walker and Son, Bingham, showed chiefly drills, for which they carried off a £10 and a £5 prize, aud a com- mendation. Wallis and Steevens, Basingstoke, in the machinery department had one of their S-horse engines driving one of their prize thrashing machines, and two slow motioa automatic folding elevators. Wandley and Robb, Wisbeach, showed two improved horse hoes, and also an improved guard for a thrashing machine. Ward and Silver, Sudbury, had on their stand a road waggon, several carts, a straw elevator, several chaff cutters, and numerous other useful implements. Warsop and Hill, Nottingham, exhibited at work their rock drill, which is entirely self-feeding, certain in action, very light, easily fixed, and requires only a low pressure of steam or air to work it. The value of rock boring by steam power in all mining and quarrying operations is now universally acknowledged, and a simple and efficient tool of this kind in the rough operations of mining must be invaluable. A. Watson, Andover, had a stacking elevator with horse gear working it and a bone crushing mill. The Welland Vale ISIannfacturing Company, Canada, had an excellent collection of forks, spades, shovels, rakes, and other farm tools. W. Whitehouse, Ampthill, exhibited several improved implements in cultivators, horse hoes, and grubbers ; be- sides some good ploughs and harrows. R. Willacy, Preston, who is well known for his shed- ding and fittings for cattle, showed also several other use- ful appliances for feeding stock, and a patent manure dis- tributor. W. A. Wood, London, made a good display of his well- known mowers and reapers. An iron frame has been adopted for the new self- delivery reaper. All the bear- ings are brass-bushed, unnecessary bolts and nuts dispensed with, and increased strength and simplicity gained. The gearing can be readily reached, and is covered, to protect fromslraws and dirt; patent spring oilers, so highly appre- ciatedin the iron frame mower, areappiiedtoallthe bearings Owing to the simplicity and perfection of the gearing and cutting apparatus, the direct or forward draught is lighter than that of any other self-raker, the work being easy for a pair of ordinary horses. It has no side-draught what- ever, and is so perfectly balanced as to avoid any weight on the horses' necks. The platform is lengthened and the sweep of the rake increased, so that while laid grain is as effectually picked up as before, the sheaf is delivered in a neat compact bundle, leaving a full wide track, sufficient for the largest horses. The rakes are wider at the divider shoe end, which in long and laid crops grows increased power over the grain, aud dispenses with wooden slats or iron rods. Woods, Cocksedge, aud Co., Stowmarket, besides a large collection of miscellaneous implements, had four engines on the ground, working thrashing machines, Andrew's stacker and elevator, many pulpers and root- cutters and mills, and some very cheap and well-made carts with their patent tippers, which we described last week. JohnWray, Bedale, had a new corn-reaping machine and an improved horse hoe for thinning turnips. H. Wright, Boston, had several straw elevators and stacking machines aud portable horse works. W. T. Wright, Cardiff, a new prize hay and corn horse pitch-fork or elevator, which will carry its load and discharge it without assistance from the man. One of the smartest and pleasantest features of the show is the seed section, where the stands, profiting by 180 THE FABMBR'S MAGAZINE. Messrs. Sutton's example, are now always so tastily ar- ranged. But the great Reading house has here nearly all the best of it, only the rising West-country firm, Messrs. Wheeler, Gloucester, caring to make any counter demonstration, as tlie Giljbs and Carters offer no sign. Shall we say again and again how richly these two rival stands were furnished with roots, seeds, plants, pictures, and so forth? Or how, in the tour through the ground, the Prince Imperial of Germany received from the hands of Mr. IMartin Sutton a copy of his Amateur's Guide ? THE GENERAL MEETING took place on the ground on Tuesday, Mr. Edward Holland, President, in the chair. There was a large attendance. Tlie Secretary, Mr. 11. M. Jenkins, read the report of the judges appointed to award the farm prizes. Votes of thanks were passed to the Mayor and Corporatiou of Bedford, to tlie Railway Companies, and to tiie Local Com- mittee. Mr. E. A. Faucett (St. Albans) said in tlie montli of IMay he wrote to the Secretary in order that he might draw the attention of the Council to the observations he intended to malie at this meeting, and in order that no gentleman might think he had any personal feeling against either the judges, or against any member of the Council, he deemed it necessary to make this explanation to put himself in a proper position. Ue had placed his suggestions upon paper, and he would read them. They were simply suggestions for the Council to take into consideration for its members to think carefully over, to adopt such as they approved, and reject those not worthy of attention : 1st. The judges at the Royal show ought not to act at any previous show ,in the same year. 2nd. At p/e- sent the majority of the prizes are won by fat and not by breeding animals at all. 3rd. The Society ought to appoint men to take all the animals into the rings that can safely be led by them, as great dissatisfaction exists now with prizes being given to animals led into the rings by well-known men who ought to be excluded. 4th. The appointment of the judges is now made in the most objectionable manner, and is highly unsatisfactory to [the great bulk of the exhibitors. 5th. They are fretpently appointed by the influence of breeders or ex- hibitors who are members of the Council of the Society. 6th. The judges ought to be changed every year ; no one should be allowed to act a second time, or oftener than once in six or ten years under any pretence whatever, and new blood should be continually brought forward. 7th. The ages of cattle should be calculated from the 1st of January, the same as horses, and not from the 1st of July on any account whatever. (In Scotland and Ireland the ages are always calculated from the 1st of January.) 8th. Let the exhibitors of all animals which have not gained prizes go home feeling assured tliey have at least been dealt with in a fair, honest, and liouourable manner. In conclusion, he thought he had better explain what course he intended to take. In the show-yard he had heard a great many complaints made, to which his answer was, "Why not speak out ?" It was no use grumbling and not bringiujj their complaints to the front in a straightforward manner. Like men they should come forward and tell the Council what they thought. The suggestions he had made lie intended to pubhsh, and when printed he would forward them to the members of the Society, who could then choose whether they would af^eept them or not. Mr. T. WiLLSON (Northamptonshire) said it would be re- membered that at the last annual meeting he made a suggestion with regard to the elections of the Council, which, he under, stood, could not be carried out without an alteration of the Charter. In order to meet the difficulty he had now to pro- pose— " That in order to enable the Council to prepare a more representative house list tlian heretofore, four clear weeks before the first Wednesday in ]\Iay (when the house list is prepared in accordance with the ICtli liye-law) a circular shall be sent to the members of society in those counties in which the retiring members of Council reside, inviting them to send up the names of gentlemen eligible for members of Council; ana whenever it is proposed to nominate members of Council from counties which had not previously been represented upun the Council, a similar circular shall be addressed to all members resident in such counties." The Council was nearly a self- elected body, and Northamptonshire, Leicestershire, and Ru land were not represented on it at all. Next year they were going to invite the district in which those counties were situated to compete for the meeting of 1876, and therefore those counties ought to be represented on the Council. Por the want of a more thoroughly representative character he was afraid the Royal Society was becoming less popular. Seven years ago he was able to obtain 72 members in one year, whereas now he had difficulty to get seven. He alleged that the competition for the show was not so keen as it used to be, stating that they had almost to beg and pray to go into the district of the Bath and West of England Society, and partly attributed the declension of the Society's popularity to tlie fact that its executive is not so thoroughly representative as it ought to be. No one wished better to the Royal than him- self, and no man had worked harder for its success than he had. If the Charter required altering he hoped the Council would consider it as early as possible. The Marquis of Exeter said he represented Northampton- shire on the Council, though he had not been able to attend, so that Mr. Willsou was in error in saying that that county was not represented. Mr. Stratton seconded the motion. Ue submitted that nothing could be more anomalous than that the Executive of a Society numbering 6,000 members should be nearly a self- elected body. Virtually the great bulk of the members of the Society had no voice in its management. He did not complain of the general management of the Society. In fact, he dared say it could not be better than at present, but he contended that the Council were elected in an anomalous manner and quite contrary to the spirit of the age. Although a humble member of the Society, he yet claimed to have a voice in the m.anagement of its affairs. The Council was at variance with the majority of farmers throughout the country on the subject of the laws relating to contagious diseases of animals. The resolution the Council drew up respecting foot-and-mouth disease he considered to be mpracticable. The Central Cham- ber of Agriculture could claim to be a purely representative assembly, and he might offer it as something of an example. The President said he must be allowed to state that at a general meeting he had no power to put such a proposition before the members. A bye-law compelled the Council to take notice of the suggestions made at a general meeting and to consider tiiem, but nothing further. In regard to this and other matters it seemed that they were hampered by the clothes in which the Royal Society was first dressed. Siie still wore the same clothes ; they had not been extended with her growth, and now that she had reached full age, perhaps the time had come when an alteration should be made in ihe Charter, and when she should be dressed as she ought to be dressed. In the meanwhile the Charter tied their hands, and all they could do was to take notice of the different suggestions made and consider tliem in Council. He hoped the time had come when they might also consider the question of the alteration of the Charter. He expressed his regret that he could not put the proposition from the chair, but with that explanation he hoped the reason would be understood, and also that to a cer- tain extent he agreed with them. Mr. Chambers complained of the inconvenience occasioned to the exhibitors of implements by requiring them to be on the show ground on the opening day, when it was knovrn that the trials would not come on for four or five days afterwards, lie spoke feelingly, as he came to tiiat show on the opening day at great inconvenience to himself, and had to wait until the Friday afternoon following before his implements were tried. He suggested that a week before the trials notice should be given to every exhibitor on which day his exhibits would be judged, and that he should not be required to be pre- sent before that day. As an honorary director of the Norfolk show he thought his request could be complied with, and sub- mitted that there was nothing unreasonable in it. Sir JoTiN HERO^• I.Iaxwell moved a vote of thanks to the retiring President, and tins was seconded by Mr. Paucett. Mr. HoLLAKD, in reply, wished them to allow him to ex- press his sense of the value of the Council of the Society. It might not be exactly suited to the wishes and feelings of some of the members, hut he must say that, accustomed as he was to work with public bodies, he knew no other that attended to business better than the Council of the Royal Society. The suggestions that had been made were rather matters of detail than of principle. He thought an improvement might be THE FARMBK'S MAGAZINE. 181 made ia the way the Conucil was elected ; but while he said that he begged them to understand that he expressed himself with strong feeling when he said that no body of men witli whom he had ever worked had been more pleasant to work with or more determined to do their duty by their constituents than the Council of the Royal Agricultural Society. On the motion of the Marquis of Exeter, Lord Bridport was elected President for the ensuing year. Lord Bridport, who was very warmly received, esteemed it a very high honour to have been elected President of this great Society, in which he had long taken a great personal in- terest, especially in its financial affairs. He was happy to think tliat the Society was in a good condition, and that it was able to meet a rainy day whenever that might come. Tlie Society had had and no doubt vvould have to meet with ditli culties ; but he had no doubt the Council would conduct the Society in a progressive spirit, and that flic suggestions that had been made to-day would be very carefully considered. THE BEDFORDSHIRE PRIZE FARMS. [From a Special Correspondent.) A few members of the Royal Agricultural Society of England, while at Bedford, agreed to visit tlie farms which gained the first two prizes as the best- managed in the county ; and the following notes are sub- mitted after a somewhat hasty inspection. The party was advised to visit, in the first instance, the farm of Mr. Richard Checkley, Brogborough, Woburu ; and were told it would be found to commence at the foot of a steep hill some eight miles from Bedford. The visitors found the hill, and the first point of attraction was a gateway, minus a post, leading into a large fallow field, an untrimmed hedge fencing from the road. Doubting our position, we hailed a man at work in the field, and asked if this was the first prize farm ? Answer : " Yes." " How long has the gatepost been down, before or since the judges inspected ?" " Oh, before. Traction-engine smashed it, and master has not put another up since." We note the fallows are a black, loamy clay, free from couch, but not free from thistles : have been worked by steam culture. Ascending the hill, our Captain suggest- ing wi should enjoy the beauties of the scenery more if we descended from our chaise, we did so, the stouter members of our party declaiming against hills in general, and this hill in particular. Note — Our Captain kept his seat on the box, as he said, " to help the coaciiman in case the horses turned restive." At the top of tlie hill we left the Queen's highway, and drove across a pasture field to the house of Mr. Checkley. Note — An attempt is beiug made to improve the road across the pasture, the material employed striking us as being of a sandy nature, tolerably free from stones. On reaching the premises we became immediately sensible of a pungent odour proceeding from a broken-backed haystack, which we unanimously pronounced dangerous, and decide we should not like to sleep withing 500 yards of it. By the kind consent of Mr. Checkley, and piloted by a young gentleman, who modestly protests against too much "cross-examination" from our Captain, we explore the home buildings, whicli we found a heterogeneous lot, evidently enlarged as occasion rccpiired, and evincing great ingenuity of arrangement, but decidedly free from simplicity. After we hud inspected the last of this curious set of buildings our Captain counted his party, which we considered a happy thought, the hot haystack being taken into account. We now note several stacks of wheat and beans, which induce our Captain to observe the farmer's balance must be on the right side. We ad- mire the cart-horses, seventeen in number, which are good and strong, adapted for a hilly country. We spe- cially commend three mares with colts at foot, three of our party each selecting a different mare and foal for choice, and evincing a disposition to break the tenth commandment, which our Captain promptly and sternly checked. We critically examine forty-lour Shorthorn dairy cows, which, with younger stock, we pronounce very useful. Note — All the calves are weaned, the cow- calves kept for stock, steer-calves sold. A breeding flock of 270 long-wool ewes is kept. Wether lambs are sold as fat tegs, ewe lambs kept for stock. On one of our party remarking he did not highly appreciate the sheep which came under our observation, our Captain suggested the speaker was comparing the flock with the pampered animals under the canvas in the distance, which judicious remark stopped further comment on sheep. We now examine a field of red clover and the corn, which we are advised to do by a gentleman, who accidentally turns up and speaks with authority. We are struck with the wide distance of the clover-seed drills — 8 iuches apart. We measure several drills, to be certain that we are right, and all agree that our occupations will not stand clover- seed drills so wide. Note — The land is thoroughly clean. We now pass through fields of wheat, white and red on either hand, and pronounce the wheat fine and very clean. We carefully examine the ears of each variety to find an ear set four, but we fail. Nearly all were set three. Notwithstanding this little drawback, the wheat is good — as much as can stand — and all wish we could look with as much satisfaction on our own wheat fields. With the barley we were, if anything, better pleased. It is a splendid crop, and one of our party naively remarked, the landlord was sure of his rent. We found some good mangel, and some gappy mangel, also some patchy kohl-rabi : all very clean. We sought for swedes in vain. We admired the internal fences on the farm, which are white-thorn, planted in straight lines, well protected by post-and-rail fencing when young, and clipped into form. Our Captain remarked these fences had cost the tenant a round sum, when some one said the landlord had borne the expense, even to the clipping of the hedges. We unanimously hoped this system would become general with landlords. Mr. Checkley's occupation is about GOO acres, of which 240 are pasture. As we have remarked, the farm is hilly, and cultivated under difficulties. It is the property of the Duke of Bedford, who has erected a second set of buildings upon the farm, of a convenient character, with labourers' cottages adjacent. On our way back to Bedford one of our party asked the startling question, " Is a man en- titled to the prize for the best-managed farm in Bedfordshire who carries part of his hay in such condi- tion as to seriously injure it, and runs the risk of de- stroying the contents of a rick-yard, and an extensive set of farm-buildings ?" Our Captain, who wore a badge connecting him in some-wise with the Council of the Royal Agricultural Society of England, declined to give an opinion. His troop, to a man, answered " No," A suggestion was thrown out that the Council of the Royal Agricultural Society of England ought to request the three farm judges to closely inspect the hottest part of the hot haystack, and report thereon forthwith. But as that body can only move as their Charter permits them, this investigation may not take place until the old home- stead of the first prize farm in Bedfordsliire is reduced to ashes, and a verdict has been pronounced, " cause of fire unknown : supposed to be the net of unionists." In bidding farewell to Mr. Checkley, who is a farmer of the old-fashioned type, and of very simple habits, we thank him for his civility and hospitality. 182 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. THE SECOND PRIZE. A short drive tlirough lanes whicli should be green took us from the first to the second prize farm in Bedford- shire, occupied by Mr. Thomas Crouch, of Lidlingtou, comprising 253 acres arable, and 204 acres pasture land ; also the property of the Duke of Bedford. The farm premises and dwelling-house are comparatively nevr, con- venient, and centrally situate. After passing through good wheat and barley, though not quite so heavy as Mr. Checkley's, we came to some fallows, which puzzled us not a little. The land had been ridged for swedes, and drilled on the ridge. The swedes not coming as quickly as the farmer desired, and a shower having fallen a few days previously, swedes had been again drilled, this time in the furrow. A lively discussion ensued as to this style of management, some of us asking what was to feed the roots if they grew in the furrow, as the dung would be above them ; others, how the horse hoe was to operate, a great feature in strong land cultivation ; others again asking how the roots were to be set out and singled, sup- posing half the crop came on the ridge, and half in the furrow. In our dilemma up rode Mr. Crouch, and we forthwith appealed to him. " Gentlemen," said he, " I wish to find the swedes, and I leave the swedes to find the dung, the land is full of it of one kind or other." Mr. Crouch admitted the impossibility of horse hoeing, and the difficulty of hand hoeing, but the season was excep- tional, and the growth of roots a necessity. So far, however, the prospect for swedes is anything but cheering. The mangel is good and clean, and we found a strong lot of ox cabbage, which, with favourable weather, will afford a deal of keep. There is more timber about Mr. Crouch's arable land than on Mr. Checkley's, which may in some measure account for the wheat not appearing so good as on the first prize farm. But the barley which we saw at Broughton End is very fine, and must prove a highly productive crop. Mr. Crouch said he had a portion of sandy land on his farm, on which the barley did not look so well ; but much as we wished to see everything, time did not permit us to reach the sand. Mr. Crouch has followed in the steps of his now famous neighbour so closely, that he also has a heated haystack, but we did not consider it dangerous. Our keen-eyed Captain drew the attention of his troop to tho singular fact that, in a season of drought 80 prolonged that neither farmer could show a swede or turnip, each could manage to sweat his hay. Here, again, we found ricks of wheat, barley, beans, and oats, which led to a discussion, from a pecuniary point of view, as to the policy of keeping so much unthrashed corn, and further, how far it is advisable to deprive the farms for a season of the large amount of manure the straw, if utilized, would produce. We admitted the occupiers of these farms were justified in keeping a reserve of oats, beans, and hay, but the majority of us opposed the retaining barley and wheat on pecuniary and productive grouuds. It is just possible an extra amount of rotten farmyard dung would have given the swedes the farmers so anxiously s< ught. Mr. Crouch showed us thirty-two Shorthorn cows, which we pronounced very fine : they are of good size, style, and quality, and well adapted for the dairy. Six promising bull-calves were running with their dams, and in a few minutes a bargain was struck for one of them by one of our troop to improve dairy stock in the South. The produce of the cows is usually weaned, steers and surplus heifers sold fat at about two years old, and the best heifers retained lor stock. All Mr. Crouch's cattle in the pastures pleased us much, and he has evidently crossed with bulls of pure and good blood. Two hundred and forty long-woolled ewes are kept. We understood Mr. Oouch to say, that after retaining sufficient ewe lambs to keep up his breeding fiock he makes mutton of the rest, ewes and wethers. It struck us that the sheep farming on each of the farms we visited is not a strong feature in the management. On the farm of Mr. Crouch our Captain called attention to a Cotswold ram which he thought had suffered from change of air. Mr. Crouch is young, active, energetic, fond of his farm and live stock ; disputes with our Captain the points of a cow, and fairly holds his own ; admits his cart-horses are not equal to Mr. Checkley's ; is gratified to hear all of us say we consider his herd better than Mr. Checkley's ; keeps some calves under a close-roofed building with fatting pigs, and, as he hurries us past them, says, " The calves are not quite right." No wonder ! we have never known other animals do well under a close-roofed building with pigs. The fences we saw are chiefly bull- fiachers, not trimmed by the landlord, but in several instances they divide pasture from arable laud. ' Mr. Crouch rides a good hackney, which a knowing man of our party attempts to disparage by saying he carries a large bread-basket. We try to induce the owner to set a price on his horse, but, like the ancient Arab, he laughs, and rides away. We highly commend his coUey dog, and offer to treat with him for it, as the brute looks affec- tionately towards us. The master shakes his head, and in a trice the colley whisks his splendid tail, as good as saying, " I'm glad you've gone," and bounds after the hackney with the bread-basket belly. Mr. Crouch set us down to a round table large enough for a dozen, and we did justice to his generous hospitality. His excellent lady anticipated our wants, and treated us with extreme kindness. It was easy to see who tended the roses, who cared for the flowers, who imparted grace and charm to the cozy home. For once — and once only — our strict Captain yielded to iufluences which ihe greatest warriors in every age are powerless to withstand, and promised the lady all kinds of civilities if slie would come to his quarters in the show-yard. We were surprised to hear the labourers had struck, some weeks since, on the farms of Messrs. Checkley and Crouch. The men must have greatly miscalculated their position. Neither of the farmers are needy men. They can hold their corn without inconvenience. They can hire steam cultivating tackle, or purchase any implements, economical in a labour point of view, they choose to have ; and the farms are in a condition, and the principal arable land of a nature which really require, at certain seasons, a minimum amount of manual labour. On our route, to and from these farms, we saw no ploughs at work with pairs of horses abreast. We saw several three-horse teams, single, moving very dry fallows, apparently for the last time. We saw others, two horses, single — boys driving. Has a prophet no honour in his own country ? Are the exertions of the Howards to extend the use of pair-horse double ploughs throughout Europe unappreciated in Bedfordshire ? Lest it should be said that we are " disappointed com- petitors" who make these notes, I am permitted to say, by special permission of our Captain, that note of us hail from " the Shires," but from points very wide apart, extreme east to extreme west of England ; and we visited the first and second Bedfordshire prize farms with the same object we visit the Royal Agricultural show — to obtain information. EXPORTATION OF CLYDESDALE MARES TO AUSTRALIA. — Mr. James Fisher has just shipped to his brother in Australia, 17 Clydesdale mares. These mares have been selected with great care, and at much expense. Among these is the well-known mare Darliag, one of the most suc- cessful prize-takers in Scotland, who finished her career here by the winning the Cup at Stirling, open to all comers. lu selecting these Mr. Fisher has takeo care that the mares are all of good descent and sound in every way. THK FARMER'^ MAGAZINE. 183 SHEEP SALES. MR. CHARLES IIOWxiRD'S OXFORDSHIRE DOWNS AT BIDDENHAM, BEDFORD.— This sale took place under the directiou of Mr. R. B. Staf- ford, of Bedford ; Mr. Strafford, the Shorthorn auctioneer not being well enough to attend, while we regret to add thst Mr. Charles Howard himself was absent from indisposition. Considering the short supply of feed the sale was considered a very good one, the average being over 13 gs. ; while one sheep was sold to Mr. Z. Phillips, of Woburn, for 36 gs. ; and another, the reserve in liis class at the Royal, after a close contest between Mr. Stilgoe and Mr. John Treadwell to Mr. Stilgoe for 33 gs. Other sheep went all over the country, the buyers or hirers including the Duke of Portland, the Duke of Bedford, backed by a number of handy-home custo- mers, and others from the Eastern Counties, Germany, Polandi and Scotland, a number of sheep going abroad. MR. RAWLENCE'S HAMPSHIRE DOWN RAMS AT BULBRIDGE. — This sale took place, under the conduct of Messrs. Ewer and Winstanley, wlien 200 lots were offered. Tiie business commenced with 10 lots of two- teeth rams, which realised the following prices : 75 gs. (Mr. Morrison), 58 gs. (Mr. Newton), 50 gs. (Mr. Dibben), 24' gs. (Mr. Homer), 15^ gs., 15 gs., 10| gs., 10 gs. (two lots beiug sold at this figure), and 7^ gs. Two bidders claimed to have offered 43 guineas for lot 10, and " an advance" was accord- ingly asked. After a spirited contest between Mr. Homer and Mr. Newton, the sheep was knocked down to the latter at 58 guineas, amidst cries of " Well doue, Wiltshire." Then came five lots of four-teeth rams, which fetched 43 gs. (Mr. Barton), 40 gs. (Mr. Parsons), 37 gs. (Mr. J. Taunton), 19 gs. and 14 gs. The lambs came next, and lot 3 was, after a most spirited competition knocked down to Mr. Morrison, of Fonthill, at the extraordinarily high figure of 150 guineas! Otlier lots realised 77 guineas (Mr. Morrison), 48 guineas, 43 guineas, down to llj guineas ; Mr. R. Brine 70 gs., and Mr. Rigg, jun. 50 gs. The averages were as follows : 28 tffo-teeth rams, £15 7s. 9d.; 8 four-teeth ditto, £23 13s. 8d. ; 177 ram lambs, £13 8s. 9d. The average of the entire sale was £13 12s. 3d. per head. THE HATCHWARREN HAMPSHERES.— Mr. Budd's sale took place iu Basingstoke, Messrs. Downs and Awbery being the auctioneers. The ram lambs for sale fetched good prices, and every other lot was sold at satis- factory prices, averaging nearly £10 each. THE LITTLESCOTT HAMPSHIRES.— At the first sale of Mr. John Moore's flock 100 ram lambs, 60 two and four-tooth rams, and 150 draft ewes were brought under the hammer of Messrs. Waters, Son, and Rawlence. One of the old rams, of great size and fine sym- metry, was eventually knocked down at 40 guineas to Mr. Saun- ders, of Watercorabe ; the remainder ranged from 13^ guineas down to 4J guineas, the average of the twenty-two being about £8 10s. There were only two six-tooth rams put up, one of which fetched 12^ guineas. The draft ewes, of which only 150 were offered, sold at an average of about 50s. each. Considering the season (which has happened most unluckily for Mr. Moore) the sale was considered very satisfactory. MR. J. J. GOLMAN'S SOUTHDOWNS AND NOR- FOLK POLLS. — This sale took place at Easton Lodge Farm, Norwich, for which city Mr. J. J. Colman is member. Heavy thunderstorms fell during the day, but the country all round had suffered much from the drought. Prices ruled low for the sheep, the ewes ranging from 49s. to 66s. per head. Mr. Beck for the Prince of Wales, Mr. Fulcher for Lord Sondes, Mr. Youngman for Mr. A. Hammond, and Mr. Parmeter being the principal buyers. No rams were let, and four only out of the fourteen sold ; two being taken by Mr. Woods, Lord Walsingham's agent, at 8J and 7i guineas. A seven-year-old cow of Mr. Birkbeck's went for 36 guineas to Lord Sondes ; Novelty, five years old, at 33 guineas, to Mr. A. Taylor ; one 45 guineas ; and others at fair prices — the average being nearly £23. AGRICULTURAL INTELLIGENCE. BAT AND BALL FAIR.— This, the second important cull lamb fair of the season held in East Sussex, took place in the well-known field near the Bat and Ball Inn. A large nurnber of both buyers and sellers was present, but, as was anticipated, business was not so brisk as in some pre- vious years, and prices exhibited a marked decline, the same as they did at St. John's. The number of sheep and lambs penned was a trifle over 10,000, being nearly 6,000 short of last year, when the supply was far above the average. Trade during the morning ruled very dull, but from what we heard those who sold early had the best of it, many preferring in the afternoon to part with their lambs at low prices rather than take them home again. The prices for sheep ranged from 29s. to 50s. Lambs, 13$. to 30s. Business slightly im- proved in the afternoon, but many peus remained unsold. In the store beast market there was a goodly show, and we understand a general clearance was effected at prices the turn in favour of the seller. Mr. Sharp bought of Mr. Griffiths a half-dozen runt heifers at 13 guineas, and seven at 10 guineas. Mr. Uridge, of Chailey, sold early, but we did not hear the figures. Tliere was a large number of horses on offer, and good useful nags commanded high prices, but most of those brouglit were " weeds." BRISTOL ANNUAL COLT FAIR.— This annual fair has been lield, and was rather thinly attended by pur- chasers. Holders brought a large number of cart colts and fillies to the fair, owing to the shortness of keep ; in fact, in all cases where farmers and others had not work for their animals, they seemed anxious to dispose of them, owing to the dearth of fodder and the little prospect of any improvement. Under these circumstances, there was a reduction in value to the extent of something like 20 per cent., and this would apply to everything except animals of special merit. Cart colts, as a rule, ranged from 35 to 50 guineas, though in one exceptional case 130 guineas was given for a thoroughly good and useful pair of colts, and in another case 53 guineas was given for a filly. There was a good supply of Irish colts and nags, but they were not selling so briskly as usual, and they realised prices ranging from £38 to £50 ; but in one case £53 10s. was obtained for a very good animal. English nags were iu fair supply, but in somewhat indifferent condition, and they changed hands slowly, at from 35 to 75 guineas. There was altogetiier less business done than usual. CAMELFORD JULY LAMB FAIR.— At this fair, there was about an average number of lambs and sheep penned, the greater part of whicii exchanged hands, but at prices about 10s. per head less than last year, and at only half the price made two years ago. Small lambs sold from 9s. to 14s. per head, good store lambs from 18s. to 30s. ; a few very good fetched from 35s. to 40s. each. Fat sheep sold at 7d. per lb. On Tuesday the fair was well supplied with cattle of every description, rather over the average as regards numbers, and many were of superior quality. A better lot of cattle has seldom been seen at this fair, and many head ex- changed owners, but sales were very dull at the commence- ment, sellers being unwilling to part with their cattle at re- duced prices. Those sold were at prices about £3 or £4 per head less than last year. Steers varied in price from 14 to 30 guineas, according to size. Fat cattle sold at from £4 to £4) 5s. per cwt., cows and calves at £3 to £3 10s. KIRTON LINDSEY FAIR. — The fair attracted a large company to the town. The day was excessively hot, and proved somewhat unfavourable to business. Very good horses were shown, for which, early in the fair, large prices were asked, and a good stroke of business was done at pi ices ranging from £30 to £50. At dinner time trade lan- guished under the excessive heat, and during the afternoon 50 guinea animals were in some instances sold as low as 30 gs. Cart-horses were scarce, the few good ones on offer being quickly sold at high rates. The effect of the long drought was seen in the paucity of fat stock, none of the animals shown being fit for the butcher. The sheep fair was a failure both in the number penned and the sales effected. The few lambs on offer could hardly find customers at prices as low as 17s. per head. Altogether the fair was considered not equal to former years. 184 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. REVIEW OF THE CATTLE TRADE DURING THE MONTH. A dull tone has prevailed ia the cattle trade during the month. The extreme heat has militated against any approach to activity ; whilst the lars^e supphes offering have caused a weakness to be observable in prices. The supply of beasts has been numerically good. The Lincolnshire season has now fairly commenced ; the arrivals have been decidedly in excess of the average, but the quantity has not been generally good. Owing to tlie scarcity of water in some districts stock has been prematurely forced upon the market in a half fat condition, hence supplies have exceeded requirements. Receipts continue to come to hand from the Eastern counties, but they are gradually being reduced in extent, ana will shortly altogether cease. From abroad the arrivals have been moderate. As regards trade, a heavy tone has prevailed, and the tendency of prices has been unfavourable. At one time the best breeds were making 6s., but at present the top price cannot be said to exceed 5s. 8d. per 81bs. In the sheep pens there has been an abundant supply ; as in the case of beasts, tlie trade has been very dull, but if any- thing the depression has been still more severe. Throughout, sales have progressed heavily, and the top quotation has fallen from 5s. 6d. at the commencement of the month to 5s. per Slbs., the rate now current. Lambs have been purchased cautiously, and have been drooping in value. Calves have been in moderate supply and limited request at about late currencies . Pigs have been dull. The following table shows the imports of stock into London during the mouth of July, compared with the corresponding month of 1873 and 1873 : 1873. 1873. 1874. Beasts 5,093 7,203 4.,721 Sheep and Lambs.. 53,634. 53,750 36,393 Calves 3,958 3,761 3,441 Pigs 1,544 2,439 4,303 From our own grazing districts, as well as from Scotland and Ireland, the receipts of beasts during the month thus com- pare with 1873 and 1873 : 1872. 1873. 1874. From NorfoUi, Suffolk, Essex, &c... 2,700 5,190 3,800 Lincolnshire, Leicestershire, &c 3,300 3,580 7,000 Other parts of England 1,500 2,190 3,200 Scotland 176 — 70 Ireland 411 .500 — The supplies of stock exhibited at tlie Metropolitan Cattle Market have been as under : 1873. 1873. 1874, Beasts 18,790 ... 31,305 ... 31,690 Sheep and Lambs 137,650 ... 150,580 ... 169,850 Calves 3,800... 4,910 ... 4,130 Pigs 590 ... 395 ... 400 The following is a comparison of prices for July of the cur- rent and two previous years : 1873. 1873. 1874. Beasts ... 3 3 to 6 2 4 0 to 6 0 4 0 to 5 0 Sheep ... 4 0toG6 40 to 6 6 4 6 to 5 4 Lambs... 8 0 to 9 0 7 0 to 8 6 5 0 to 6 4 Calves... 4 8 to 6 0 4 0 to 6 2 3 10 to 5 6 Pigs 3 8 to 5 0 4 0 to 5 0 3 8 to 4 10 KEVIEW OF THE CORN TRADE DURING THE PAST MONTH. After extraordinary fluctuations in June — say from great summer heat to sharp morning frosts — the last week of that month indicated an improvement, which has been fully realised throughout the whole of July. The second week brought on a tropical temperature, which has often prevailed since, and, with occasional showers and thunderstorms, all vegeta- tion has been rapidly advancing, and wheat-cutting has already commenced. Only the Talavera sort has yet appeared at market, which in quality was below the average, having perhaps been cut by the frosts while in bloom ; but the later sorts and red qualities are expected to be fine. The impression of a great crop seems, how- ever, passing away, and but little above an average is expected, with the finest weather. After so long a period of drought, however, we do not seem very safe against rain, which has commenced falling, and, should the past deficiency be made up at harvest-time prospects, would be sadly changed. In spite of all the fluctuations of a late spring, we are now about a fortnight early, and this cir- cumstance alone is about equal to an importation of one million quarters. English qualities, from their scarcity, have been slow to decline, but have certainly fallen 2s. to 3s., while foreign has given way this month 7s. to 8s., and from the highest point IDs. to 12s. ; fline Australian white, which once touched 70s., now being hardly worth over 6O3. ; and good Milwaukie red lately quoted 61s., having been offered on the last Mon- day at 48s. 6d. But as English stocks are well- nigh exhausted, and the granaries show but small stores, a firmer feeling has sprung up with the broken weather, as every bushel of old must soon be wanted. Of hay this year we have only gathered half a crop, and all spring corn is expected to be short and dear. How, therefore, the principal grain can become dog-cheap we cannot well see. Even New York seems to have passed her lowest, and though very large expectations are enter- tained this year as to the exports of California, they want confirmation, and Bi'other Jonathan is not likely to be content with working for nothing. Italy and Spain have finished, and done well. France has partly got in her produce, in fine order and of good quality. Hungary- has completed her work, with a gathering something above the ordinary. Holland and Belgium are beginning, but never grand enough for themselves ; and Germany is yet a fortnight or three weeks from harvest-work. All Europe, therefore, still depends on the weather as a means of great benefit or damage, and prices cannot be esta- blished before the sheaves are generally gathered. The following rates have recently been current at the several places named : new French white Anjou wheat at Paris 55s., red 53s., old Californiau at Eouen 57s. 6d., Chili 55s. 6d., red spring American 51s., new at Bordeaux GOs., Berdianski at Marseilles SSs. Belgian and Dutch prices were too unsettled to quote. Fine native wheat at Hambro' 68s. 6d., the best white at Danzig oSs., red at Stettin 54s., at Cologne 4Ss., at Berlin 54s., fine Hun- garian new at Pesth 53s., old white at San Francisco 523. 6d. (cost, freight, and insurance), red spring at New York 45s. 6d. per 4801bs. The first Monday in Mark-lane opened on a small English supply, but the foreign arrivals were good, about THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 18£ two-tWrds being from America, and 10,000 qrs. from Australia. The show of fresli samples of home growth was exceedingly small ; but the weather haviun; been re- markably fine, millers were very careless buyers at the previous rates. The foreign trade was very limited ; white sorts were dull at the former rates, but the abun- dance of American red made sellers rather anxious, and they accepted a decline of Is. to 2s. rather than laud. Moating cargoes were little in demand. The weather continuing tine all.through the week, made all the country markets dull and drooping, though very little was brought to market, from the scantiness of stocks. Prices tended downward, and several places noted a decline of Is., as at Louth and Newcastle. Liverpool quoted a fall of 3d. per cental on Tuesday, and was Id. to 2d. cheajier again on Friday. The principal Scotch markets noted a decline of Is., as Leith, Edinburgh, and Glasgow. With nothing of home growth exhibited at Dublin, foreign descriptions of wheat were Is. per brl. lower. On the second Monday the native supplies were still smaller, and the foreign, though fair, were materially re- duced. Again there was a very trifling show of English samples on the Essex stands, and none whatever on those of Kent ; yet the weather having reached to almost tropical heat, English factors were glad to accept Is. less money on the few samples for sale. White qualities of foreign gave way Is. per qr., with but little progress in sales, and red American were again 2s. per qr. lower than on the previous week. Floating cargoes were a slow sale also at Is. to 2s. decline. With the crops everywhere rapidly advancing, farmers were more willing to clear out their small stores at the several country markets. Early in the week there was little material change, though the tendency was downward ; but on Saturday several country places noted a reduction of Is. to 23. per qr. Liverpool was 4d. per cental lower. Though markets [were dull at Leith, Edinburgh, and Glasgow, there was no positive decline in wheat. At Dublin foreign qualities again gave way 6d, to Is. per barrel. On the third_Mouday the returns of English Wheat were the smallest of the season, but the foreign arrivals were unusually heavy, America supplying two-thirds and Australia a large quantity. As to the exhibition of English samples this morning, it scarcely reached to half- a-dozen, and those not of fine quality, and it was certainly fully Is. per qr. cheaper to sell ; while the heavy arrival from abroad, after such continued forcing weather, reduced business almost to a form. Fine foreign descriptions, both ■white and red, were offered at 2s. reduction, without attracting many buyers, and low red could only be sold at 3s. per qr. less money. With liberal arrivals off the coast, but little was done, and that at Is. to 2s. decline. The lightness of supplies this week in many country markets kept values from being reduced for fine qualities, but Salisbury and Hull noted a decline of Is. per qr., while Leeds, Birmingham, Barnsley, Spilsby, and Newark were lower Is. to 23. Liverpool was down 2d. per cental ou Tuesday ; on Friday the market was Id. to 2d. lower. Though Glasgow only gave way Is. per qr. for wheat, and spring corn was unaltered, Edinburgh was down 2s., barley and beans declining Is. Dublin was again Gd. to 9d. per barrel cheaper for foreign wheat, and 6d. lower for oats, but maize rose 6d. per qr. On the fourth Monday there was another light supply of English wheat, though rather more than ou the pre- vious Monday, the foreign arrivals being nearly as large as then, and about three-fifths from America, Australia doing also its quota. The show of English samples was again limited, without any fine among them; they there- fore were still dull, at a decline of fully Is., but rather more was doing in foreign than of late, at a decline of Is. for fine samples, and Is. Gd. on inferior American red. j\Iany holders then thought the lowest point had been reached. Floating cargoes during the week were a slow sale, and rather cheaper. The imports into Loudon for the month, were only 8,081 qrs. English, and in foreign they were 193,819 qrs., against 9,890 qrs. English, 20G,145 qrs. foreign in 1873. The London exports were 9,565 qrs. wheat,24,751 cwts. flour. The imports into the kingdom for the four weeks ending July ISth were 4,417,836 cwts. wheat, 535,260 cwts. flour, against 3,891,129 cwts. wheat, 502,936 cwts. flour in 1873. The London averages commenced at 62s. 6d., and closed at 6O3. 5d. The general averages opened at 60s. 4d., and closed at 60s. lOd. These English prices, however, gave a very false view of the market, for the bulk of the business done has been in foreiga ; white qualities have fallen fully 8s. per qr. from the highest point, and red American fully 12s. ; good Milwaukie being off'ered at 48s. 6d. per qr., lately worth 60s. to 6I3. The flour trade necessarily has given way with such a change in the wheat trade, Norfolks being down fully 2s. per sack, and not worth over 41s., and barrels have been equally depressed, the best not being quoted over SOs. to 31s., while at New York extra State was quoted 253. 6d. At Paris, too, rates have been so reduced that we may possibly have some imports thence. The London sup- plies in four weeks were : from the country 48,335 sacks, the foreign 8,235 sacks 63,127 barrels, against 53,320 sacks country made, 8,551 sacks 40,554 barrels foreiga in 1873. Maize has declined about 2s. to 23. 6d. during the month, in consequence of the fine weather and increased supplies, the fourth Monday showing heavy arrivals. American mixed is not now worth over 34s. 6d., though it is still cheaper than barley, beans, or oats. The total supply for London in four weeks was 69,041 qrs. against 62,773 qrs. in 1873. Of English barley only two small lots have appeared during the month, stocks being quite exhausted, but the foreign arrivals have been fairly kept up. In the absence of business on malting sorts no quotations could be available, and the supplies from abroad coming to hand, principally from the Black Sea, have been mostly for grinding, these being worth 31s. to 34s., and heavier sorts for distillation in proportiou. A parcel of new has appeared from Kent, for which 45s. was demanded ; but the sample, though good-coloured, was thin and steely, and prices cannot yet be settled. Fine sorts we expect will be scarce and dear, and this is also expected in the Saale districts in Germany. The London imports for the month were only 125 qrs. British, 38,401 qrs. foreign, against 1,030 qrs. British, 370 qrs. Irish, and 14,537 qrs. foreign in 1873. The Malt trade has almost been in a state of suspense through the month, and rates have been reduced Is. to 2s. per qr. The English supply of Oats for the month has been very light, but the foreign was good, increasing as the month advanced. Yet such a demand has been ex- perienced for this grain, Parliament still being in town and the stock of English corn exhausted, that prices have rather advanced — say 6d. to Is. per qr. ; fine black feed, weighing 40 lbs., being worth 32s. 6d., and 381bs. 29s. 6d. ; white, extra weights, might realise 343. to 35s. A few new samples of winter corn have appeared fi'om Kent, and were held at 34s. to 35s., being very fine and heavy. In France the crop is light as well as here, and stocks in Europe seem exhausted by the high rates quoted. We don't see for the present what can materially reduce them, for it will be long before the crops on the Continent can be gathered 18t5 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. and shipped here in fair couJition. The imports for four weeks were 931 qrs. English, no Scotch or Irish, and 208,565 qrs. foreign, against 2,120 qrs. English, 15 qrs. Scotch, aud 249,415 qrs. foreign in 1873. Beans, though not much in demand during the sum- mer, have rather tended upwards, from scarcity ; fine small English have reached to 56s., and Egyptian were not abundant at 443., some new Oran having brought 45s. The quality this year is said to be good, though there is but little corn. The London imports in July have been in English sorts 1,533 qrs., and 4,438 qrs. foreign, against 1,440 qrs. English, and 308 qrs. foreign in 1873. Old peas have been steady through the month, maple having in small quantities brought 47s., while good white for feeding have not realised over 433., and boilers not above 453. Some new dun of good quality have come to market from Kent, held at 45s., but buyers keep aloof. The imports into London for four weeks were in English sorts only 108 qrs., in foreign 16,338 qrs., chiefly from America. Linseed has not varied for some months. The imports for four weeks were 29,605 qrs., against 40,051 qrs. in 1873. In cloverseed next to nothing has been passing, the small stocks left over being held above buyers' views. White mustardseed and canaryseed have been advancing, as well as old winter tares, and a f Joint General AVHITBREAD TOMSON, i Managers. ////> ":c::::^ THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. SEPTEMBER, 1874. PLATE. COMTESSE. From the Thukgarton Stud. Our sketch is taken from one of Mr. MilwarJ'a varmint little hacks, whose annual sale at Tattersall's, in the Derby week, is now famous in story. Comtesse was in this year's lot, but having gone amiss a day or two before the lot started for Knightsbridge, she was left behind, and Miss Chatty put in her place, which, after some brisk bidding, was knocked down for 250 guineas. Comtesse is now herself again, and if all goes well will be sold at the next sale, and when we prophesy at a high price. On seeing her at Thurgarton, in the spring, we thus spoke of her : " Comtesse, a Trench lady, by Orphelim, dam Marquise by The Cossack, is as neat and varmint a little blood hack as ever was moulded, and, though full of hardy muscle, she is as free from dross as a genuine Damascus blade, and as merry a goer as her dam's sire, who we now see with Templeman up making all the running for the Derby, the second, third, and fourth being by the game old Lanercost, a horse which has left his mark in France. If we were giving a description of Comtesse for the Hue and Cnj, we should say : " Lost, a blood hack ; a good, hardy chesnut, fourteen hands two inches high, with a star in her forehead, and a white coronet on the near hind foot, and eight saddle marks. She has a full eye, and a nice head, tapering towards the muzzle, with plenty of width in the jowl ; a beautifully formed neck, and a grand rise in the withers ; deep, well laid shoulders, round barrel, good loins, buxom quarters, muscular arms and second thighs, clean legs, and good feet, with the most knowing of switch tails. She has a black spot, where the cantle of the saddle would come, and another at the base of the stifle-joint, near side. N.B. Whoever will bring her," &c., &c. HOLIDAY TIME. Holiday making is often enough hard work for those who do not " keep their hand in." Your bricklayer who has taken a day to see his baby christened or his mother- in-law married again, or for some other such joyous an occa- sion, will be back to his mates, either listlessly looking on or far more cheerfully giving his aid, before his high fes- tival is half over. The artist will pull out his pencil at your pic-nic, the citizen in all the abandonment of the sea-side can still never be quite happy until he has scanned to-day's Money Article ; while no sooner is the Session over than the member of Parliament goes away into the country to make speeches. There is something, however, in this particular practice which reminds one much of " the Star" system of a provincial company. A man who was never heard at Drury Lane, never known at The Olympic, becomes a leading actor so soon as he only leaves London. And thus it is with your county mem- ber : if never heard in Westminster, he plays a prominent part directly he reaches home again ; especially plaintive Old Series.] as he is when touching on the hard work which he has just gone through. How "from the smoke-room, from the tea-room, from the dining-hall, from the library, from the pleasant terrace facing the river where he can sit on summer evenings and watch the stately coal barges go up to their haven at Fulham creek — has he come trooping at the sound of the division bell, and blocking up the bar, waiting for the signal ' Ayes to the right, noes to the left. Tellers for the ayes, Mr. Black and Mr. Yellow ; tellers for the noes, Mr. White and Mr. Blue.' What is the question upon which the committee are going to divide? Happily for the silent member, he is not called upon to form an opinion or even to know what the division is about. His duty is to follow Black and Yellow or White and Blue into the lobby, record his vote, and go back to the terrace to finish his cigar and wait till the tiutinabu- latioa of the division bell once more calls him to arise and save the State." But the local Star, the county member or the N Vol. LXXVI.— No. 3. 188 THE FAEMEE'S MAGAZINE heretofore silent member, will have a deal more to say when he takes the chair or finds himself toasted at the anniversary dinner of the Agricultural Society. And yet in reviuwinst Ihe past session from a conntry-side point of view it is really difficult to surmise what the honourable gentleman will be able to say beyond the fact of his having consistently voted with White and Blue and reso- lutely opposed Black and Yellow. Shall he flourish again over the hazy platitudes of Local Taxation, and still tell of all which is to be done in this way ? Or, shall he mourn with Mr. Pell the loss of a measure which promised so much for the rabbit interests of this great country ? Or, shall he sympathise with Mr. Seeley in his somewhat unappre- ciated efforts to exempt all landlords from the action of Tenant-llight who do not understand the principle ? Or, shall he take the opportunity of explaining how he for once defied the beck of Black and Yellow, or was deaf to the behest of White and Blue, and fairly ran away from his arm-chair and his cigar so soon as Mr. Fieldeu began to talk about the IMalt-tax ? Whether he be Yellow or whether he be Blue, the honourable gentleman in addressing a body of agriculturists during the coming autumn will ever be touching on draigcrous ground ; for never had more been promised, and never has less been done to further the cause of the farmers than since the change of Government consequent on the last election. All that the Commit fees of the previous Session had done in the way of inquiry and recommendation has been shunted : the Game-Laws and their manifest abuses have been left alone, the land Transfer Bill has been postponed, and somebody at some time or other will do something with the Landlord and Tenant Bill. There is nothing like having a friend at Court. But the Farmers' Friend will in his discretion hardly confine himself to all that which he did or did not do when in the well - drilled chorus at Westminster. lie will, the rather, be anxious to find other topics to talk about, and will so touch on the labour question and the good harvest. But here, again, he is venturing on dangerous ground. The Eastern Counties farmers, who were from the first in the front of the fight, have won the battle of the employers, with little or no thanks for the aid or interference of the landlords. The farmers, like the boxers of old, fought in grim silence, while the laud- lords indulged in demonstrations, where scarcely any two of them agreed, and the effect of which was mainly to direct more attention to their own shortcomings in the way of cottage accommodation, game preservations and rents still screwed up to the uttermost farthing. Suffolk farmers have sought us to say that some of these self- elected champions should above all look at home, and, no doubt, as we have maintained from the day of the out- break, the labour difficulty must eventually be one for the landlord to deal with. High rents, a great head of game, restrictive lop-sided agreements, and tumble-down cot- tages are scarcely arguments, however abundantly sup- plied, which tenants will appreciate when their case is taken up through philosophical addresses or philanthropic exudations. But in any case there will be the capital corn crop to fall back upon, although even of this it will not be quite safe to talk too fast. Some returns collected a few weeks since have gone to show that the wheats in England are very generally above the average, although actual inquiry into the crop during the last few days has tended in some districts to qualify such an opinion, more particularly down eastward. Thus, our Essex county report, as given in this number, states that " the wheat crop has probably been over-estimated, as the ears will not bear close ex- amination, at least those of white varieties grown in this county." We have similar advices from farther on in Suffolk and Norfolk, as we are ready to admit that we are not prepared to rate the wheat crop so generally good, or rather at so much above an average as up to the time of cutting had been calculated. The ears are occasionally only half " set," and once more people may have been deceived by outward appearances. As we wrote just a mouth since, the cutting alone can tell what effect the frosts have had. THE TEA TEADE, Amongst the agriculturists of this country there mnst be many to whom the limits of these Islands appear circumscribed, and who would gladly direct their attention to more distant fields, where they could discern some opening that invited them to carry into effect those pre- dilections which have made of them the tillers of the land. xVnd to such we would commend the perusal of certain papers published recently by the India office, containing the Ijistory, present and past condition, of the tea planta- tions in Bengal. From a small experimental garden in Assam, they may learn how these plantations have grown up to occupy a space that is small compared to the vast area of India itself, and the scale upon which cultivations are fhere carried on, but which nevertheless numbers three-quarters of a million acres, and exercises a perceptible influence upon the tea market by its produce. At the present time there are some doubts as to who can claim the credit of having first discovered the capabilities of this part of the Himalayas for tea growiug, but it is suffi- cient to know that the i.onour rests with cue or two persons, and that the foundations of this industry were laid between 1856 and 1859. At first the prospects that surrounded the attempt were made to appear so brilliant that the planters themselves, although doubting whether it would ever pay to grow tea, had no doubt bnt that it would pay to make gardens. Beyond this, many specu- lators took advantage of the ignorance and credulity of investors to palm off upon them what may be called shoddy gardens, to meet the requirements of a London or Calcutta promoter. But these misdeeds of the past would not be referred to were there not signs at the present time of the same state of affairs which made them possible ten years ago. The depression that then followed the nati;ral collapse of many such comers was intensified by the ignorance of the general body of proprietors of tea shares, who showed as much folly in their haste to get out of tea as they had a few years before in their eagerness to undertake the specu- lation. Tjiis depreciation of tea property seems to have continued until about 1SG9, when things began to look brighter. It was seen that people who had worked steadily for years with a view to make gardens that would yield a profit had been rewarded, while much of the property of the collapsed companies had turned out well under careful management. In fact, it was again found that tea would pay, and ever since it has been steadily progressing in popular estimation, and as a general rule, in profit to those engaged in it. This great and growing importance of the tea trade has led the Government of India to ask for certain statistics, somewhat similar to our agricultural returns, relating to the tea culture. The planters have been invited to state also what obstacles exist in their localities to the fullest THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 189 development of lliis branch of production, and what, if any, measures in their opinion would properly be adopted by government for their benefit. This inquiry, as may be supposed, has resulted in the acquisition of a very con- siderable amount of valuable and otherwise inaccessible uformation, and we leara for the first time that the extent of land held for the purpose amounts to 804,582 acres, and the area actually uuder tea culture is 70,341 acres. Those which are called mature plants cover 56,973 acres of this space, and the immature 13,369 acres. Although this classificatiou, the best that can be adopted, is thought too uncertain for practical purposes one deduction may, it is thought, be confidently drawn from it. It is almost certain that all the plants classed as immature are uuder seven years old ; in other words, that they have been planted siace 1866. So that we may assume that at least one-fifth of the present tea cultivation has been commenced since the period of depression of the industry ; and there can be no more satisfactory proof than this of its complete recovery. The whole yield of the province of Bengal, although somewhat conjectural may be taken at 15,000,000 lbs. The yield of immature plants can be fairly recloued at 80 lbs. per acre, which would give 1,069,520 lbs., and the yield of the mature at 237 lbs., which would give 13,500,617 lbs. At the head of the divisions comes Assam, where the first experiments were made and where the tea now grows in five districts — Seebsagar, Durruug, Luckinipur, Now- gong, and Kanirap. The total area taken up for tea planting is stated to be 364,990 acres, and the amount cultivated, exclusive of certain unreturned gardens of Luckimpur, to be 26,853 acres, or little more than 7 per cent. The area under mature plant is returned at 21,890 acres ; that under immature as 4,963. The produce of both classes during the year 1872 was 6,150,764 lbs., of which 1,500,000 lbs. were produced by the Assam Com- pany. Next to Assam comes Dacca, with two tea- growing districts — Silhet and Caehar. Then Kuch Behar, with two tea districts — Darjeeling and Goalpora. In the Chittagong divisioi- there is only one tea growing district — Chittagong itself. At ChotaNagpur the tea cultivation is very unimportant, thoiigh there arc gardens in two dis- tricts— Hazaribagh and Lohardugga. The difficulties that have arisen during the rise and progress of this cultivation have been chiefly owing to the paucity, in fact the absolute want of labour in the first instance. Tea planting, it seems, requires a larger supply in proportion to the area cultivated than most kinds of agricultural industry. The population in almost all the districts suited for tea is veiy scanty, and the proportion even of this available for hard work is small ; consequently, early in the history of tea planting the local labour obtainable in Assam and Caehar was found insufficient, and attempts were made to import labourers from more populous districts. But the surplus food produced in the tea districts is very little, and food for the imported labourers had conse- quently to be imported also. The means of communica- tion are very imperfect, and when large numbers of coolies were thus imported the supply of food did not keep pace with the increase of mouths. The consequence ■was that tens of thousands died from diseases brought on by want of proper food, whilst others were so enfeebled that their labour failed to repay the employer the cost of importing them. The Government, at the present time, while dealing with the waste lands at their disposal, and for which they have many applicants, will be required to give the most careful attention to this question of labour, how it is to be obtained and how fed ; otherwise a more liberal distribution of land would only aggravate the difficulties of the planters. The course marked out for the Government seems to be the encouragement of free labour as opposed to any system in which special protec- tion is given to the labourer on the one hand, and to the employer on the other. To this end there will need strong district administration, and officers should be made to feel that the tea industry was not excepted from the urisdiction of the regular authorities and the ordinary aw of the country, and that no tenderness for the inte- rests of tea-planting should bo allowed to interfere with the suppression of illegal practices. For the rest, roads and other means of communication towards and within the tea districts, should be pushed forward as rapidly as the resources of the empire may allow, and no means left untried to encourage the increase of the local pupula- lation, and of the cultivation of food-staples in these districts. The opinions of Mr. Campbell, who has derived great experience from his connection with Assam, with respect to tea planting as a commercial undertaking, are well de- serving of attention. With suitable sale and good management the average yield of an acre of tea-plant in full bearing may be reckoned at 4001bs., which, if care- fully prepared, would, in the English market, fetch about £40. The cost of forming a plantation, of cultivating it when formed, and manufacturing the tea, are high ; nevertheless, with proper and careful management, a very satisfactory margin of ])rofit may be relied upon. The amount of profit derivable from a well-planted and care- fully-managed tea concern is liable to fluctuate from two causes only, viz., the prices of tea in the home-market and the cost of labour in the gardens ; neither of these two causes is ordinarily liable to sudden and capricious changes. To a person with even so small a capital as two or three thousand pounds, tea planting would prove a most profitable undertaking. The revival of confidence has been extending slowly but steadily during the past three years, and at the present time the prospects of the industry are far brighter and better than they have ever beea before. It is to be hoped that, with the experience gained by knowledge of the causes which led to former disasters, it will continue in its present healthy course and furnish an opening for the enterprising men of onr own country. THE PRICE OD^ SKILLED LABOUR NEAR LONDON. — If this meet the attention of the agricultural labourers, they will not perhaps believe that there are hundreds of skilled " sons of the soil" working in market gardens, horticultural gardens, and in the great floneultaral hothouses round about, and in the Metro- polis, whose wages average from 18s to 12s a week without any perquisites, cheap cottages, or work in wet or frosty weather. Moreover, these men work harder than thrasliers, plowmen, hedgers, sow ers, mowers or other tillers of fields. I take first the men in market gardens, who in many cases are up three nights a week to market. Their wages on an average are but IBs aweek. Then there are the Government hands in the parks,and their pay aver.ages about 14s a week. I next arrive at the hands skilled in floriculture, horticulture, and arboriculture. Tliese men are era- ployed in Loudon nurseries aud exotic establishments for the low wage of 12s. Many of these gardeners are Latin scholars botanists, landscape surveyors, aud chemists. It is true that being employed in the London nurseries is but a step to em- ployment as head gardeners in noblemen's gardens, where the wage may reach 300 guineas a year ; but I know for a fact that steady, clever men have been for years awaiting an open- ing for their services. The majority of these 12s. a week men hail from Scotland, and have to subsist on onions, bread and oatmeal. The only flesh meat they come in contact with is outside butchers' shops. These facts should sliow that some of the " sons of the soil " are somewliat worse off in Middlesex than other counties. — The Labour News. N 2 190 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. THIN SEEDING. The season 13 fast approaching for putting in the wheat seed for next year's crop. The general practice is to allow three bushels of seed per acre, and the average pro- duce does not much exceed 28 bushelsper acre — say, 9 or 10 for one. The question of the com- parative results of thick and thin seeding is in the present state of agriculture a more importantone than most farmers are aware of. If it readily can be proved that sowing one bushel per acre instead of three will produce as good or a better crop than three bushels, supposing the extent of the land sown is, in round numbers, four million acres, it gives an amount of eight million bushels saved in seed only ; whilst some who have tried it say that the produce is greater. Now, we are im- porting from eight to eleven million quarters of wheat per annum — for the two last years it has amounted to eleven millions — and the ([uestion is a simple one, whether t would not be as well to reduce the proportion of seed wheat, besides increasing the produce, which all those who have tried thin sowing aver is the case, and thereby lessen the importations to the same extent ? Every bushel imported is a dead loss to the country, if it can be proved that by a more economical culture — in whatever way — it is possible to produce this at home. The tirst instance we shall adduce as to thin seeding is that of Jethro Tull, who, about the beginning of the last century, occupied a farm or farms of 200 acres of his own, which he cultivated on per- fectly novel principles, the first and foremost of which was, "that thorough tillage is competent, with or without manure, to secure the pi'ofitable growth of any given species of cultivated plant year after year in succession." This theory he carried into practice for upwards of thirty years with so much success, that, instead of impoverishing the soil, be let off a part of it at one-third more rent than had previously been given for it. He introduced the practice, more recently adopted by the late Mr. Smith, of Lois Weedon, of sowing half the land in portions of three feet, embracing three rows, having unsown intervals of the same breadth between them, and he found that he could grow heavier crops on half the land than his neighbours did on the whole. Mr. Smith, too, practised this 'plan for nearly twenty years, and produced, on half the land, from 35 to 40 bushels of wheat per half acre. The amount of seed sown was from one to two pecks per acre, no more being ever applied. Mr. Hallett, of Brighton, offers another example of thin seeding. His farm or farms consist of about six hundred acres, a considerable portion of which consists of down land, having from four to six inches of soil lying on a chalk subsoil. It is unne- cessary to go at length into the system adopted by Mr. Hallett, whose object is to produce a quality of wheat founded, like superior cattle, on an authentic pedigree. His system embraces thin-seediug as a first principle. Thus, sown early, one hundred acres are seeded at the rate of one bushel to six arres, whilst the latest sowing is one bushel per acre. Mr. Hallett's neighbours seed at the rate of three busliels per acre ; he therefore saves in seed alone from 180 to 280 bushels. As a sample of what may be done by this system, Mr. Hallett hired a large field belonging, we believe, to the Corporation of Brighton. It was such a barren spot as to be considered actually in- capable of growing wheat. We saw this field under wheat seeded at the rate of one peek per acre, the product of which was a crop of 48 bushelsper acre. One good effect thin seeding is the entire absence of under-corn — that is, weak and short plants holding inferior ears and con- taining thin and imperfect grain. Heavy seeding always produces this defect, which detracts from both the quality and quantity of the return. There was no such under- corn in Mr. Hallett's crop, the ears being all one height, and as level on the top as a table. Another case is that of Mr. Piper, an Essex miller and farmer, who, for twenty-five consecutive years, grew wheat every year without manure, except a dressing of soot, and without ploughing the land, using only a hoe to scuffle iu the seed, and planting in at the rate of li pecks per acre. It was said that the produce exceeded by a quarter per acre more than obtained by the neighbouring farmers, and iu one season reached to seven quarters per acre. Like Mr. Mechi, Mr. Piper was accustomed to send annually a printed statement of the profit and loss accruing in the season. Mr. Miller, the curator of the Botanical Gardens at Cambridge, inserted an account of the experiment which he undertook, in the Philosophi- cal Transactions of the Royal Society : — " In the month of June, 1766 sowed some wheat, and on the 8th August one plant was taken up and separated into eighteen parts, and replanted. These plants were again taken up and divided in the months of September and October, and planted separately to stand the winter, and this division produced sixty- seven plants. These were again taken up in March and April, and produced five hundred plants. The number of ears thus formed from one grain of wheat was 21,100, which gave three pecks and three quarters of corn, estimated at 576,840 grains. The land was of medium quality, and no manure applied." An acre of land contains 43,560 square feet ; three bushels of wheat contain, at the rate of Mr. Miller's wheat, 1,832,554 grains, which divided by 43,560, the number of square feet in the acre, gives 42 grains of seed to the square foot ! Is it surprising that frequent failures of the crop should occur with such crowding of plants which, like human beings, can only be healthy and strong with plenty of room to develope their productive faculties ? THE POTATO.— The crop is in danger, although neith r fungus nor beetle have as yet assailed it anywhere. The tubers have ripened prematurely, and, generally speaking, the crop is light, but good. Now, the danger it is in is this — that it is ready to start into a second growth in the event of ram occurring quickly and copiously. What is called " super- tuberating," or the growth of new tubers above the old ones, is a destructive process, for the old tubers that give birth to clusters of new ones above them are robbed of their fecula, and become flinty and tasteless in consequence. To prevent supertuberating, the crop must be lifted and clamped in the coolest and dryest place that can be found for it, and it will be safe for any reasonable length of time. To wait until it is dead ripe is not necessary. If done growing and beginning to ripen, it is perfectly safe and prudent to lift, for the mo- mentary exposure to the atmosphere, and separation from the succulent haulm will hasten the ripening, and render the crop less disposed to grow than if allowed to ripen perfectly in the ground,— r/5ff Gardeners' Magazine. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 191 THE LANDLORD AND TENANT BILL. TO THE EDITOR OF THE JIARK LA\E EXPRESS. Sir, — Landlords, their lawyers, their supposed in- terests, their arbitrary farm contracts and leases are at present thought to be the grand obstacles to high-farming and more productive husbandry. There is to be there- fore a Landlord and Tenant Act for England, as there has been for Ireland, with the view of removing the anomaly. To the introduction of the Bill Mr. Disraeli is pledged. It is not, however, to contain the 12th clause of the Bill of the Messrs. Howard and Read. To that clause, of course, Mr. Disraeli and others of the " Farmer's Friends" profess an unconquerable dislike. Neither is the proposed Bill to be after the manner of the Marquis of Iluutly's Bill, or of the complexion of an " exaggerated Irish Land Act," as the Huntly Bill was termed by the Duke of Richmond. The Duke has intimated his resolution that no such Land Bill shall become law. The promised Bill is likely therefore to be very much of that sort which the play of Hamlet would be with Hamlet left out, and not altogether a Parliamentary Bill in the common acceptation of the term ; but rather, I should say, the ukase of a Ministry of Landlords, which, thanks to the farmers of England, are, for the time being, omnipotent in the realm : in many respects more powerful therein than the Sovereign, and, at all events, in a position to dictate to those who raised them to their present altitude. " By the grace" of these dictators the promised Land Bill may possibly contain a measure of good notwith- standing. It may contain the incalculable boon to tenants of a two years' notice to quit ; it is certain to provide for " free contracts" as between landlords and tenants, and to continue to the former the power to evict the latter, as a leverage or " screw" necessary to make the said " free contracts" a success. Important events are often the unexpected result of small and insignificant causes; and — There is a liMid that shapes our ends, Rough-hew them as we may— the promised Land Act may form no exception to the rule. The admitted necessity for such an Act is an immense stride onwards of itself and in its most carefully- constructed clauses, however undesigned may lie hid the seeds and incipient principles of the future, and entire destruction of what yet remains of an arbitrary and a harsh feudal landed system in England. There is, indeed, no better authority than history ; and history ever furnishes the proof that discontent and revo- lution follow resistance to reform as surely as effect follows cause or night follows day. "What so much led up to the Reform Bill of 1832 as oppression? What ensured Corn-law repeal so much as opposition ? And even in that "leap in the dark," and the «/i«?« House- hold Suffrage Bill that followed, is to be recognised the powerful incentive to that Liberalism which interfered to turn a measure of mere pretence into one of real reform. As it was with this original Household Suffrage Bill, so will it be probably with the anticipated Land Bill. It will be Conservative nominally, but revolutionary in reality. It will pretend a great deal, and yet give little. It will be at one and the same time positive and negative in character, and any advantage given by it to the tenant in one clause will be rendered nugatory in another. In one respect it is all but certain to be less fortunate ulti- mately than the Household Suffrage Bill ; for whereas that encountered a Liberal majority in its progress through Parliament, by whose exertions it was so altered as to screen its authors from disgrace, the coming Land Bill is likely to receive merely the attentions of a Liberal minority, which, thanks to the farmers, will be powerless to change the incongruities that are sure to exist in tfie measure into those provisions of justice and security to the tenant, such as the exigencies of a densely-populated country demand. The Act in question is to protect the landlords from " contracts from which human nature recoils." The idea is one of Mr. Disraeli's, and, of course, cuts in more direct tions than one. If, for instance, it is just to so protec- the landowner, the rule must of necessity, in aland where equal laws prevail, be also applied for the protection of the occupier. Overboard then must ere long go every contract enforced upon the tenant in the matter of game ; away must go those in connection with the law of dis- tress ; and next there will have to follow destruction to those feudal farm leases and penal contracts which have hitherto so much and so unduly obstructed the cultivator, and enabled the landlord at will to seize upon and to confiscate to his own use and advantage the property in the improvements of the occupying tenant. Viewed in this light, " freedom of contract" may not, after all, be so bad a thing to have. Nay, but the admis- sion of the principle is, as likely as not, to be the intro- duction of the thin edge of the wedge of the most sweeping land-tenancy reform. To insist upon" free contracts" in the letting and hiring of land is really to insist that the landlords and the tenants shall meet each other as com- mon traders — that both shall be alike deprived of pro- tection, and thus stand towards each other in contracting as independently as do merchants in contracting on the Exchange. Admit this, and who can object to it ? And the necessity is admitted of free trade in land, of the restriction of the power of the landlord to evict, of the overthrow of the laws of primogeniture and entail, and, over and above all, of giving to the tenant the right to the property created by him in the improvement of his farm. Such property is as tangible, and as much entitled to protection, as property in an estate. It has even the advantage over property which has been inherited, inasmuch as it is the result of the appli- cation of the capital, the skill, and of the industry of the accumulator. Why, then, should property so realised, and which can be proved to have been realised, be open to the seizure of a landlord? In short, if the land- lords are not to be "forced into contracts" with regard to the letting of their farms, "from which human nature recoils," why, in the name of justice and fair play, should the tenants be " forced into contracts" with regard to the hiring of their farms and with respect to their tenures and improvements thereon, "from which human nature recoils" ? Yours, &c., Thomas Robertson, Narraghmore, Alhy, Aug. 10. 192 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. MANGOLD WURZEL. By THE HORXHEKN FARMER. It is absolutely impossible to overrate the value and importance of this plant as a source of cattle-food for the spring and summer months, or to substitute auy other article, either home-grown or purchased, which will tide over with the same amount of plenty, economy, or satis- faction what is universally admitted to be the scarcest period of the whole year. The farmer who has had the industry and foresight to provide and hold over a large supply for early summer need care but little how the season turns out with regard to growth of grass, whether dry or moist, early or late, as he holds in his yards the material of superabundance, a comparatively small breadth of surface, it the land has been liberally treated, supplying an immense bulk of food, suitable alike for horses, cattle, sheep, and pigs, and of which all seem to be alike fond. Coming into season at the very period when the swede, however carefully kept, begins naturally to decay, lose its sap, and become worthless as food, it forms a connecting link between the old season and the new, which, combined withits extraordinary abundance, renders itone ofthcmost useful and valuable plants known to modern husbandry. In situations where climate and soil are suited to its growth and successful culture it actually supersedes the swede, and is yearly increasing in favour with large stock- owners. It contrasts favourably with the latter in first of all, having fewer enemies in the earlier stages of its existence, therefore, if once fairly started, it is almost certain to progress uninterruptedly to successful maturity. Again, it is a plant that delights in a rich and highly- manured soil, and will stand any amount of forcing, giving an immense return for liberal treatment, the ex- pense of which bears no comparison to the value of the crop in cash, or the advantages it confers on the owner of a heavy stock during the spring and summer months. Moderately good land, deeply stirred by grubber or plough, or with both — which makes the best work of all when performed in the autumn — the eradication of weeds being attended to at the same time, may faiily be expected to give a return of not less than forty tons of roots to the imperial acre, an amount iu itself surely amply sufficient to encourage the farmer not only to lay out a considerable sum in applying dung and auxiliary manures, but in rigidly attending to carrying out in perfec- tion the whole of the cultural details, from the preparation of the land for the seed, to the storing the roots iu the cud of October. Given, that all the preliminary operations of working and manuring have been done in the best possible manner, it is nevertheless truly astonishing how greatly the subsequent processes of cultivation affect the ultimate success of the crop, and increase or depreciate the weight per acre in an exact ratio to the way they are attended to, wheUier attentively and carefully or the re- verse. A ley field broken up in autumn, or at latest early winter, suits admirably for a crop of mangolds; and this more particularly if the preparatory season Jiappeus to be dry and scorching, as the fresh mould retains the winter moisture longer and resists evaporation much more efiec- tually than land which had been previously cropped. The earth in this instance may be compared to very fine meal in its appearance and nature, the finely comminuted particles attracting moisture from the air during the night, and its close consistence enabling it in a great measure to retain it during the day, however dry may be the weather. It is difficult, and often altogether imprac- ticable, to render land which has been frequently cropped so extremely fine, especially if ploughed out of the stubble in unfavourable weather; as however great the care which may be taken with it in spring, or however weighty the implements which arc employed in its re- duction, it bears more resemblance to crushed cinders than to the floury compound so ardently desired by the cultivator, and so absolutely necessary for an equal and vigorous start of the young plants. Although the prepa- ration of land during showery weather is tedious and difii- cult, and, even in this case, dangerous to the work in hand, in so far as when it occurs at the period of sowing, which is very limited, the acreage under a very valuable crop may have to be considerably circumscribed and the general plan of the year's proceedings altered. On the other hand, a lengthened drought about the time of sow- ing, and extending to a couple of weeks after it, is emi- nently hazardous, inasmuch as many of the seeds will fall to vegetate in the dry soil, much of the land re- maining blank, and rendering it necessary to fill up such spaces, either by transplanting, or sowing turnip seed, both processes being disagreeable and unsatisfactory, and at best compensating in a very inferior degree for the first loss. AVhen the weather chances to be very dry, it is excellent policy to concentrate the whole available force of the farm iu men and horses, on such a portion of land, as can by a smart push be ploughed, grubbed, harrowed again and again, chain-harrowed, weeds picked off if necessary, drilled, manured, and seeded all in one day. The various operations succeeding each other so rapidly gives spirit and animation to the workers, and a big day's work is done in the best manner, with a good prospect of a quick and equal start of the seed which has been de- posited. The dung quickly spread, and covered at once with finely prepared earth, retains its moisture, communi- cating it gradually to the over-lying soil, thus materially assisting vegetation, and helping on the embryo plant in its first struggle for existence. Rolling the drills with a heavy Cambridge roller immediately after sowing is ex- tremely useful in very dry weather, as it presses the seed down on the dung, and enables the earth to preserve its moist condition under the influence of a powerful sua and possibly drying wind ; moreover its mechanical effect on the drill is to press it quite flat, exposing a large sur- face to the action of the air, from which it is thus enabled to absorb an appreciable amount of moisture during the night. Care and attention in this way will go far to obtain an even and healthy plant in almost the driest seasons. This secured, there is scarcely ever any further difficulty, as if the manurial conditions are favourable success is almost certain, the plants having no insect enemies grow vigorously, speedily covering the ground, and seldom experiencing a check until they reach ma- turity. In the cultivation of mangold-wurzel manure is all important, and no other consideration should be per- mitted to interfere with or prevent its being liberally used. Fifty cart-loads of dung made in the best manner under cake-fed beasts, is about a fair dressing for an im- perial acre, supplemented by 70s. worth of Peruvian guano, kainit, and dissolved bones. As an economical eourcc of ammonia farmers are now in a measure foi-ced to turn their attention to nitrate of soda, and as it is now vastly cheaper by the ton than it was a few years ago, a portion of it may be substituted for an equal money value of guano. But foi' its evanescent nature nitrate of soda would be invaluable to the farmer ; its effect, however, is THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE, 19^ not lastiDg, as may be easily proved by the after-crops, therefore it must be used with caution, merely taking ad- vantage of its stimulative powers on crops that will staud forcing. Deep stirring between the drills, both with plough and grubber, during the period of growth proves of immense advantage to this crop, and the time and trouble expended on these operations will be amply re- paid by the luxuriant foliage and rapidly swelling bulbs, unfailing indications of a magnificent crop. V/here the breadth grown is considerable, it is safe management to begin lifting the crops by the middle of October, sharp frosts almost invariably occurring about the lirst week of November, which are the cause of great anxiety when such a valuable crop is in danger, and although it may not appear to have inflicted much injury at the time, yet in the months of April and May a rather heavy per- centage of rotten bulbs will too truly show the cll'ect of a few nights' sharp frost, and absolute necessity of getting them early placed iu a safe position. In storing never place against a wall : it is the cause of much loss. Pits of seven feet in width, tapering to a sharp point at about the same height, being nearly as quickly built up, and when properly thatched and secured, keeping the roots over without perceptible loss from rotting, quite through the summer. THE BIRMINGHAM HORSE SHOW. Ou one or two previous occasions probably some of the classes may have been better filled, but as a whole the entries are about au average as to numbers, which is equivalent to saying that they are limited only by the size of the build- ing. First in the order of the catalogue, as heretofore, were the thoroughbred stallions, of which there were six entries. One of these, however — namely Major Ballard's Keinfrid — was an absentee, and Mr. Green's Young Goldfinder was summarily disqualified as not being thoroughbred. Of the remainder, the contest lay between thetwosonsof Stockvvell, Citadel and Laughingstock, which here met to try con«lusions for the fourth time ; the former, as usual, obtaiuiug the precedence. The hunters exceeding 151 hands, equal to fifteen stone, five years old and upwards, were prououuced to be a fair col- lection, with Mr. Goodlifl"s Marshal MacMahon first. His principal opponent, ilr. Hayward's Paramour, is a useful weight-carrier. The hunters exceeding 15^ hands high, without conditions as to weight, five years old and upwards, arc only moderate, and those not exceeding 151 hands in height are small but good, particularly Mr. Milward's mare. Emerald. The four-j car-olds are the best hunter classes. The first prize was given to Sir George Womb well's Cawton ; the second to Mr. Arm- strong's Cashier, the Islington champion. The animals which had taken the premier prizes in this and the three preceding classes were, as a matter of course, the only candidates for the cup ; aud it is a noteworthy fact that they are all of the same colour — chesnut. The race was between Marshal MacMahon and Cawton, aii'l the IMar- shal was declared to be decidedly the more fashionable and taking horse. "With the exception of the prize-takers, the three»y ear-old colts and fillies for hunting purposes are iudifterent. The Duke, sent by Mr. Coath, of ^Yalsall, is up to weight; and Mr. Goodlifl"s Lady Mary shows quality. The two-year-olds are, upon the whole, good. The hacks aud roadsters 15 hands two inches high and upwards, are a small class, headed by The Prince, with a good back, quality, and action. The hacks and roadsters 14 hands and three inches and under 15 hands two inches high, are creditable. The cobs exceeding 14 hands are also fairly represented. The best of the few weight-carrying hacks exceeding 15 hands high is Sir George YVombwell's Enterprise, a famous prize winner. The first of the weight-carrying hacks not exceeding 15 hands, six in number — Mr. Prisby's Filbert — is another known prize-taker. Sir George Wombwell takes first honours for hacks exceeding 15 hands high with Miss Sykes, a previous prize winner. Among the hacks not exceeding 13 hands high was Ozone, the property of Mr. Maltlicws, always a winner. The harness horses 14 hands three inches high, aud under 15 hands two inches high, were a moderate class. The harness cobs exceeding 14 hands and uuder 14 hands three inches, consisted niainly of draHs from other classes, IMajor Queutin taking first prize with Sparkling Moselle ; and of harness horses, 15 hands high and upwards, only three pairs came m. The muster of ponies was very large, the classes for animals not exceeding 14 hands being nume- rically the strongest. The classes for cart horses were this year struck out. PHIZE LIST. JUDGES. — TUOROUGII-BUED HU.XTEKS AJNU' HaCKS : Colonel Lattrell, Badgworth Court, Axbridge, Somerset ; R. G. F. Howard, Temple Bruer, Lincoln. Har:ness Houses AND Po>'lES : Colonel Barlow, Hasketon, Woodbridge ; J. M. K. Elliott, lleathencote, Towccster. Veterixaky IIe- EEREES : Messrs. E. S.aaley aud Sdu, M-ll.C.V.S., Islington and Birmiugliara. Thoroughbred Sires.— First prize, £25, Colonel Barlow, Hasketon, Woodbridge (Citadel) ; second, £10, R. Hutton, 74, Gloucester-place, Portinan-sqaare, London (Laughing- stock), lligbly commended : The Earl of Stamford and War- rington, Enville Hall, Stourbridge (Tlie Peer). HUNTERS. Exceeding 15 i h;inds high, equal to fifteen stone, five years old and upwards.— First prize, £30, and extra prize of £10 10s. as the best hunter in classes 2, 3, 4, and 5, J. Good- liff, George Hotel, Huntingdon (Marshal MacMahon) ; second, £10, C. C. Haj-ward, Southill, Biggleswade (Paramour); third, £5, A. H. BillingtoD, Kenuiugton House, Ashford (Lucifer). Commended : T. Pain, Lower Pcrtwood, Hiudon, Salisbury (Westhury). Exceediug loh bauds high, ivithout conditions as to weight, five years old aad upwards.— i'irst prize, £30, W. Whiteliead, Vrollaston, U'elliugborough (llufus) ; second, £10, T. U. Ashtou, Temple Laugherne, Worcester (Tlie Lancer) ; third. £5, A. 11. Biliingtou (Kate). Commended: T. P. Kempson, The Oaklands, Handsworth (Ularibel). Not exceeding 15J hands high.— First prize, £20, R. Mil- ward, Thurgarton Priory, Southwell (Emerald) ; second, £10, B. Gilpin, Longford, Cannock (Glenhewer). Four-year-olds.— First prize, £30, Sir G. ■Wombwell, Bart. ^ Xewburgli, York (Cawton) ; second, £10, W. Armstrong^ FitirMd, Keudal (Cashier) ; third, £5, T. H. Foden, Given- dale Grange, Ripou (Amontillado). Highly commended: C. C. Hayward (Richelieu). Three-year old colts or fillies.— First prize, £15, W. Coath, Moss Close Farm, Walsall (The Duke) ; second, £10, J. Good- lift' (Lady Mary) ; third, £5, J. Sankey, Metchley, Edgbaston. Two-year-old colts or fitlies.— First prize, £15, J. Everatt, Laugbton, near Gaiusburough (Sunshine); second, £10, R. Swanwick, Cirencester (Glcngyle) ; third, J. Goodlitt". Com- mended : W. Richards, Ashwell, Oakham (Claribel.) HACKS, ROADSTERS, AND COBS. Hacks aud roadsters, lo hands 2 inches high and upwards. --First prize, £15, F. G. Haines, Upper Montague-street, London (The Prince) ; second, £5, Captam J.H. Mardon, tli-j Craig, Grosmont, near Hereford (Flitton). Hacks or roadsters, 14 hands o iiiclics lugh, and umler 1j hands 3 inches hifih.- First prize, £15, W. M. Hohday, t.lie Grmo-e, Ashby Ruad, Leicester; second, £5, Miss Harrison, Easllau'd House, Leamington (Major). Higlily commended : C. A. Jacobs, the Riding Sc-iiool, Clifton, Bristol (Cora). 194 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. Commended : F. G. Haines (The Marquis) ; R. N. Hooper, Stanshawes Court, Chipping Sodbury (Constance). Cobs, exceeding li hands and under 14 hands 3 inches high. — First prize, £15, Major Quentin, Woodleigh Cheltenham (Sparkling Moselle) ; second, £5, R. Gold, Sliarman's Cross, Solihull (Steel Grey). Commended -..Mrs. Tyler, 28, Frederick- street, Birmingham (Safety) ; J. Wiggins, Market Harborough (Princess Louise). Weight-carrying hacks, exceeding 15 hands high. — First prize, £15, Sir Q. Wombwell, Bart., Newburgh Park, York (Enterprise) ; second, £5, R. B. Lewis, Walsall (Lawyer). Commended ; W. E. Warden, Chad Road, Edgbaston (Tommy Dodd). Weight-carrying hacks, not exceeding 15 hands high. — First prize, £15, H. Frisby, 13, James-street, Buckingham Gate, London (Filbert) ; second, £5, W. Sadler, 17, Hyde Terrace, Leeds (Cockney) • Highly commended : W. E. Wiley, Birones Green, Erdington (Bob). ladies' horses. Exceeding 15 hands high. — First prize, £15, Sir G. Womb- well, Bart. (Miss Sykes) ; second, £5, J. Gilman, jun., 148, Lancaster-street, Birmingham (Hinko). Highly commended: W. M. Hobday (Talisman). Not exceeding 15 hands. — First prize, £15, F. C. Matthews, Easterfield House, Driffield (Ozone); second, £5, F. G. Haines (The Marquis). Highly commended : Mrs. L. F. Webb, Chapel Oak, Salford Priors, Evesham (Fire Fly) . Com- mended : J. Gilman, jun. (Madeline). HARNESS HORSES. Horses, 15 hands 2 inches high and upwards. — First prize, £15, C. J. Shaw, Greenfield, Edgbaston (Billy) ; second £5, H. Hunt, Harvington, near Evesham. Horses, 14 hands 2 inches high, and under 15 hands 2 inches high. — First prize, £15, J.C.Rogerson, 73, Oldham- street, Manchester (Bell-metal) : second, £5, W. E. Warden (Tommy Dodd). Commended: W. Sadler, 17, Hyde Terrace, Leeds (Cockney). Cobs, exceeding 14 hands and under 14 hands 3 inches. — First prize, £15, Blajor Quentin (Sparkling Moselle) ; second, £5, J. Tyler, 209, Broad-sfreet, Birmingham. Commended : R. Gold, Sharman's Cross, Solihull (Steel Grey). Pairs of horses in harness, 15 hands high and upwards. — First prize, £15, T. Statter, Stand Hall, Whitefield, Manchester (Sensation and Tom) ; second, £5,W. E. Tharme, Wolver- hampton. Tandems of horses, exceeding 14 hands high. =.-First prize, £10, T. Statter (Sensation and Tom) ; second, £5, G. Tharme, Bradford-street, Birmiagham. PONIES. Ponies in harness, not exceeding 14 hands high. — First prize, £10, R. Wright, 72 Regent Road, Salford (Young Apricot) ; second, £5, G. J. Leek, Cop Hill, Claverdoa (Maggie). Highly commended: S. Sparrow, Downing- street, Cambridge (Tom). Commended :C. Smith, Kirk Langley, Derby. Ponies in saddle, not exceeeing 14 hands high. — First prize, £10, H. Frisby, London (Prince Polo) ; second, £5, R. Wright (Young Apricot). Highly commended: J. Chew, Thorpe, Northampton (Tommy). Commended, C. Smith, Kirk Langley, Derby. Ponies in harness, not exceeding 13 hands high. — First prize, £10, H. Gameson,81, Dale End, Birmingham (Beauty) second, £5, J. Eaton, Castle Gate, Grantham (Beauty). Highly commended: J. Taylor, 51, Great Hampton-street, Birmingham (Tom Boy). Commended : T. J. Merrick, Northampton (Essex) ; R. Travell, Rumney Court, near Cardiff (Polly). Ponies in saddle, not exceeding 13 hands high. — First prize, £10, C. A. Jacobs, Clifton, Bristol (Gem) ; second, £5, Miss Tyler, 28, Frederick-street, Birmingham (Billy). Highly commended: Captain P. P. P. Goodchild, Grange, Glen Parva, Leicester (Little Bob). Commended : R. S. Bowker, Newton Lodge, Tamworth (Lilly). Ponies in liarness, not exceeding 1 2 hands high. — First prize, £10, T. Mabbutt, Abingdon Works, Birmingham (Jimmy); second, £5, J. AUkins, 96, Summer Lane, Bir- mingham (Belle of the Ball). Commended: H. Mapplebeck, Bradford-street, Birmingham (Minnie) ; W. Piader, Ropsley, Grantham, (Topsy) Ponies, not exceeding 12 hands high, to carry children.— First prize, £10, C. A. Jacobs (Bronze) ; second, £5, J. Allkins, 96, Summer Lane, Birmingham (Belle of the Ball). Highly commended : J. Beebee, Birmingham Road, Walsall, (Beauty). Commended: W. Pinder, Ropsley, Grantham (Topsy) Pairs of ponies in harness, not exceeding 14 hands high. — First prize, £10, W. Frost, Stork Hotel, Birmingham (Alma and Globula) ; second, £5, withheld. Tandems of ponies not exceeding 14 hands high. — First prize, £5, J. Beebee, Birmingham Road, Walsall (Gipsy and Beauty) ; second, £3, Mabbutt and Allkins, Birmingham (Belle of the Ball and Jemmy). EAST CUMBERLAND AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT CARLISLE. The show, on the whole, was very good ; but the weather was so wretchedly bad that it undoubtedly kept many people away from the ground. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES. — Saddle Horses : J. Jardine, Dryfaholme, Lockerbie; AV. Forster, Burradon, Morpeth. Harness Horses : T. Kendal, Park House, Kirkby Lonsdale ; J. B. Lee, Stocksfield-on-Tyne. Cart Horses : W. Borthwick, Moncwray, Whitehaven ; J. Blackstock, llayton Castle, Maryport. Shorthorns and Sheep : J. Dean, Dalkeith Park, Dalkeith ; A. Metcalfe, Ravenstonedale, Tebay. Gallowais and Pigs: G. Rome, Glinger Bank, Long- town; J. Grierson,Kirkland Haugh, Dalbeattie. Butter: Mrs. Mark, Durdar House, Carlisle ; Mrs. Graham, Water- foot Farm, Annan ; Miss Steel, Cardew Hall, Dalston. HORSES. saddle horses for field or road. ' Brood mare, with foal at foot or in foal. — First prize, J. Moffat, Kirklinton Park, Carlisle; second, G. F. Statter, Broomshills, Carlisle. Oue-year-old gelding. — First prize, J. Rickerby, Wall Head, Crosby ; second, T. Mark, Durdar House, Carlisle. One-year-old filly. — First prize, J. Moffat; second, R. B. Fauldei-, Thursby. Two-year-old gending. — First prize, T. Kitching, The Close, Penrith ; second, J, Moffat. Two-year-old filly. — First prize, D. McAuley, Carlisle ; second, T. Mark. Three-year-old gelding. — First prize. T. Graham, Beansland Park ; second, J. Armstrong, Stub, Kirklinton. Highly com- mended : J. Brown, Wiggonby. Three-year-old filly. — First prize, G. Shadwick, Aikton ; second, J. Carrick, Brampton. Four years old and upwards gelding or filly. — First prize, W. Armstrong, Kendal (Cashier) ; second, J. Lamb, Penrith (Silence). Commended : T. Bell, Brampton (Patience). HARNESS horses. Brood mare, with foal at foot or in foal. — First prize, J. Rickerby ; second, T. Little, Thorn Tree, Lazonby. Highly commended : R. Brough, Rye Close, Irthington. One-year-old gelding. — First prize. Executors of J. Railton, Hetherington, Carletou, Carlisle ; second, W. Faulder, Bricco Hall, Carlisle. One-year-old filly. — First prize, T. Stordy, Thrustondeld ; second, T. Wanuop, Broadwath. Two-year- old gelding. — First prize, J. Wood, Boustead tlill ; second, J. Tyson, Wormanby. Highly commended : J. Marshall, Long Park. Commended : 11. Gibbous, Mossbank, Rockliffe. Two-year-old filly. — First prize, J. Norman, Roe Banks ; second, T. James, Stainton. Three-year-old gelding. — First prize, L. Potts, Wigt THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 195 second, J. Carlisle, Tarraby. Commended : J. Bell, Carlisle ; J. Liddell, Browuelson. Three-year-old filly. — First prize, W. B. Gordon, Justus Town; second, W. Nichol, Cargo. Commended: J. Todd, Mireside. Four years old and upwards gelding or filly. — First prize, G. Shadwick ; second, H. A. Clarke, Prospect House, Aspatria. Commended : J. Rome, Robgill Mains, Ecclefechan. CART HORSKS. Brood mare, with foal at loot or iu foal. — First prize, G. H. Head, Rickerby ; second, J. and G. Atkinson, Peepy, Stocks- field-on-Tyne. One-year-old gelding. — First prize, R. Gibbons ; second, Mrs. Barton, Morton, Carlisle. One-year-old filly. — First prize, J. Dalziel, Tinwald Shaws, Dumfries; second, J. Percival, Kirkbarapton, Carlisle. Two-year-old gelding. — First prize, W. N. Hodgson, M.P., Newby Grange ; second, J. Kerr, Flatts of Cargen, Troqueer, Dumfries. Two-year-old filly. — First prize, J. Kerr; second, G. II. Head. Three-year-old gelding. — First prize, R. B. Faulder ; second, T.Donald, Sanden House, Abbey town. Three-year-old filly. — First prize, W. and J. Little, Bowness Hall ; second, H. Phillips, Cracrop, Brampton. Four years old and upwards gelding or filly. — First prize, R. Gibbons (Jolly) ; second, W. Armstrong, Tarn Ends, Brampton (Nelson). Highly commended : J. Thompson, Baley Knowes, Kelso (Kit). HURDLE LEAPI^'G. Sweepstakes of 10s. each for horses of all ages suitable for hunting. Four-year-old horses to carry 11 stones. — First prize, £10, W. Armstrong, Kendal (Cashier) ; second, £5, J. Fearon, Whitehaven (Trump King). Highly commended : J. Reay, Kirklinton. A whip was presented to Mr. Beesley, rider of Dr. Carlyle's colt, for neatest costume. HACKNEY PRIZES. A first prize of £5, and second of £2, together with a a sweepstake of 10s. each, was given for the best hackney of any age, height not exceeding 15 hands 1 inch, to be brought into the ring mounted. — First prize, H. A. Clarke, Aspatria ; second. Dr. Carlyle, Carlisle. Highly commended : Major Thompson, Kirkhouse. Commended : R. Benn, Newlands. SWEEPSTAKES FOB, HORSES EOR PIELD OR ROAD. Sweepstakes of 10s. each for the best saddle or harness foal. — First prize, J. Moflfat; second, R. Irving, Butchergate, Carlisle. CATTLE. SHORTHORNS. Bulls above two years old. — First prize, W. Lambert, Eltrington Hall, Haydon Bridge (Heather-bred Lad) ; second. Sir R. C. Musgrave, Bart., Edenhall (Wallace Wynne). Highly commended : G. H. Head (Royal Edgar). Bulls under two years old. — First prize, G. Smith, The Luham, Penrith (Prince Eden) ; second, W. Heskett, Plumpton Hall, Penrith (Prince Leopold). Commended : G. H. Head (King George). Cows or heifers above three years old, in calf or in milk. — First and second prizes, J. and G. Atkinson, Peepy (St. Crispin 2nd). Highly commended: J. Lamb, Penrith (Laurestina) . Commended : \V. Lambert (White Stocks). Heifers under three years old, in calf or in milk. — First prize, J. and C. A'kinson (0. B.'s Justitia) ; second, W. Lambert (Matchless). Highly commended and commended : J. Lamb (Laurestina 2nd). Heifers under two years old. — First prize, J. Lamb (Laures- tina 3rd) ; second, D. Bragg, Southwaite Hall (Mary). GALLOWAYS. Bulls above two years old. — First prize, G. Graham, Oak- bank, Longtown (Forest King) ; second, M. and T. Teardale, Boggs, Knaresdale, Alston (Gallant Graham). Bulls under two years old.— First prize, J. Graham, Parcels- town (Sim of Whitram) ; second, R. Benty, Howend, Long- town. Cows or heifers above three years old, in calf or milk. — First prize, J. Cunningham, Taibreoch, Dalbeattie; second and commended, J. Graham. Heifers under three years old, in calf or milk. — First and second prizes and commended, J. Cunningham. Highly commended : J. Graham. Heifers under two years old. — First prize and commended, J. Cunningham ; second and highly commended, J. Graham. BULLOCKS. The best pair of bullocks of any breed, calved in 1873. — First prize, J. Cunningham. SHEEP. Bluefaeed Leicester tup of one shear. — First prize, J. Todd, Mireside, Aspatria. Bluefaeed Leicester tup of any age. — First prize, J. Todd. Border Leicester tup of one shear. — First and second prizes, T. Bell, Townfoot, Brampton. Highly commended: W. Lambert, Ellrington Hall. Commended: T. J. Bell, Oughterside, Maryport. Border Leicester tup of any age. — First prize, G. F. Statter, Broomhills, Carlisle ; second, T. J. Bell. Highly commended : W. Lamber. Pen of bluefaeed Leicester ewes. — First prize, J. Todd. Pen of bluefaeed Leicester giminers. — First prize, J. Todd. Pen of Border Leicester ewes. — First and second prizes, H. Newby-Fraser, Hay Close. Highly commended : G. F. Statter. Commended : W. Lambert. Pen of Border Leicester giramere. — First and second prizes, H. Newby-Fraser. Highly commended : W. Lambert. Com- mended: T.J.Bell. Longwool tup other than Leicester. — First and second prizes, W. Norman, Hall Bank, Aspatria. Pen of longwool ewes. — First and second prizes, W. Nor- man. Pen of longwool giramers. — First and second prizes, W. Norman. PIGS. Boars under four years old. — First prize, T. Hodgson, Newton Arlosh ; second, C. Wills, Brugh-by-Sands. Sows under four years old, to be in pig or milk. — First prize, r. Hodgson ; second, J. Bulman, Carleton Hill. Cora- mended : J. Graham. DONKEYS. Donkey of any age that can leap over a hurdle IJ feet high, age taken into consideration. — First prize, A. Coulthard, CaU dewgate, Carlisle ;_second, Miss Graham, Seugger Houses, Car- lisle. BUTTER. Fresh pounded butter, not less than 51bs. — First prize, Mrs. Wannop, Brunstock ; second, Mrs. Wilson, Lockerbie. Highly commended : G. H. Head, Carlisle. Commended : Mrs. Story, Bleatarn. Firkin butter. — First prize, Mrs. Wilson, Lockerbie ; second, Mrs. Graham, Scotby. Commended : Mrs. Waugh, Carlisle. TRIAL OF REAPEES IN SCOTLAND— The United East Lothian Agricultural Society has taken up the question of field work, and had a trial of reapers on a field of wheat, sixtj-five acres in extent. The crop was con- veniently apportioned into lots of nearly two acres to each reaper. The judges for the manual delivery machines were — Mr. J. Leunie, Longnewton ;Mr. J. Wilson, SherifTside ;Mr. J. F'. Robertson, Newmains ; Mr. J.Douglas, Atlielstaneford ;Mr. J. Henderson, Byres ; Mr. J. Russell, Greendykes ; and Mr. S. Sliirreff, Saltcoats. The judges of the self-delivery machines were— Mr. A. B. Telfer, Ayr ; Mr. Taylor, Ayr; and Mr. A. Tweedie,Coates. The awards were: Manual Deliveries. — i, £10, A. C. Bamblett, Thirsk,Yorkshire ; 2, £5, Harrison, Macgregor, and Co., entered by A. Dodds, Haddington. Highly com- mended : Picksey, Sims, & Co., entered by A. Dodds. Com- mended : Samuelsons & Co., Banbury. Self-delivery Machines — 1,£10, W. A.Wood, London. Commended: J. &F. Howard, Bedford, entered by A. Dodds, Haddington. The judges recommended a working one-horse reaper, shown by Walter A. Wood, Loudon, for a special prize. The machinery of the first and second prize manual reapers is enclosed in a tidy wooden frame, which saves it considerably in wet weather. At the luncheon, Mr. Harvey (Whittingham Mains) remarked that there was a great improvement on the reaper since the last trial in the same field nine years ago. The work to-day, he said, was remarkably well done, and he did not envy the judges. They had a dilticult task, but he had no doubt, as they were all good, practical men, they would give the prizes to the best articles. He trusted they would give due prefer- ence to the implement, w'-ich did its work best, and above all, with fewest stops. 196 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. PENISTONE AGEICULTURAL SOCIETY. The eutries of stock were 506, nearly 100 more than last year. The cattle were the best seen at Penistone, especially the aged bulls and the dairy cows. In the sheep, too, there were some good pens, but the horses were not so large a show as last year, neither were they so good, escepting'the roadsters. Pigs were about double the number of last year. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES.— Cattle, Sheep, and Agricultueal Produce : W. Ullyott, Great Kelk, Soutliorpe, near Hull; P. W. Addy, Cudwortb, near Barnsley ; W. llhodes, Swinton. Pigs, Hokses, and Doi^keys : R. Cowton, Southorpe, HuU ; C. Speight, Millhouse, Sheffield ; W. Gillatt, Wood- seats, Sheffield. Poultky : VV. Cannan, Adolphus Works, Bradford. DoGS: H. Miller, Upperthorpe, Sheffield; J. Sykes, Huddersfield. SHORTIIOENS. Bull, any age.— Pirst prize, G. Pox, Wilmslow ; second, J. Johusou, Crofts Stittiug Mill Parm,near Staveley. Bull under two years. — Pirst prize aud Cup, T. Statter, Manchester ; second, W. B. Beaumont, M.P., Stocksaeld-on- Tyne. Cow or heifer, in calf or milk.— Pirst prize, J. H. Rockett, Selby ; second, T. Statter. Two-year-old heifer.— Cup, T. Statter ; second, M. T. IIop- kinson, Cliesterfield. Heifer under two years.— Pirst prize, T. Statter ; second, J. H. Rockett. Bull of auy age. — Pirst prize, R. Lowe, Sheffield ; second, A. and R. Maun, Thornhill, Dewsbury. Cow or heifer, in calf or milk.— Pirst prize, U. Binder, Ecclesfield ; second, G. Widdison, Eccleslield. Cow for dairy purposes. — Pirst and second prizes, 11. Binder. Two-year-old heifer. — Cup, G. Widdison, Butterlhwaite, Ecclesfield ; second, W. Parkin, Bromley Parm, Wortley. Heifer under two years.— Pirst prize, U. Binder; second, G. Widdison. SHEEP. Ram of any age.— Cup and second prize, J. P. Moorliousr, Penistone. Shearling ram.— Prize, J. P. Moorhouse. Shearliug gimmors.— Pirst prize, J. Dransfield, Oxspnng House ; second, G. Swinden, Snowden Hill, Ilunsliclf. Ram, any age. — Cup, G. Swinden ; second, R. Parkin, Pond Parm, Hunshelf. Shearliug Ram. — Pirst and second prizes, C. Marsh, Peui- stoue. Tup lamb bred in 1874'.— Pirst and second prizes, C.Walker, Roughbircliworth. Pen of three ewes, having suckled lambs in IS?!?. — Cup, J. Nicholson, Eastfield, Thurgolaud ; second, C. Walker. Shearling giramers.— Cup, G. Swinden ; second, J.Pearson, Snowden liiil. Ewe lambs, bred in lS7-i.— First prize, R. Parkiu ; second, T. W. Stones, Roughbirchworth. PIGS. Boar, large breed.— Pirst prize, C. R. N. Bcswickc-Royds, Littleborougli ; second, J. CoUiss, Hillfoot. Boar, middle breed. — Pirst and second prizes, C. P. Hallas, Manchester Road. Boar, small breed.— Cup, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds ; second, J. Nutter, CleckheatoD. Sow, large breed.— Pirst prize, C. R. 'N. Beswickc-Royds ; second, VV. Green, Wadsley Bridge. Sow, middle breed.— Pirst prize, C. Pt. N. Beswicke-Royds ; second, S. C. Alderson, Barnsley. Sow, Hmall breed.— I'irst prize, ^. Coates, Haliiax ; second, C. R. W. IVswicke-Royds. Store pig, huge breed.— Pirbt prize, C. R. N. Beswieke- Royds ; second, T. Lindley, Grimesliiori.e. Stoie pig, middle breed. —Pirst prize, C. P. Hallas ; second, S. Buikinshaw, Owlerton. Stoie pig, small breed.— First prize, C. R. N. Beswicke- Rovds ; second, H. C. Liltlewood, Sheffield. HORSES. Gelding or marc for agricultural purposes. — First prize, M. Wood, Pontefract; second, J. P. Crowther, Mirfield. Brood mare for agricultural purposes, with a foal. — Prize, C. Uttley, Wortley. Poalof 1871, gelding or filly, for agricultural purposes. — Cup, J. P. Crowther ; second, J. Simmons, Huddersfield. Poal of 1872, gelding or filly, for agricultural purposes. — Pirst prize, J. Mills, Waitefield ; second, W. Bevins and Son, Wadsley Bridge. Poal of 1873, colt or filly, for agricultural purposes. — First prize, J. P. Crowther ; second, G. Wood, Grenoside. Foal of 187-1, colt or filly, for agricultural purposes. — Pirst prize, C. Uttley ; second, \V. Stead, Cleckheaton. Roadster, not entire. — Pirst prize, M. Wood; second, J. Pairbrother, Sheffield, AN ENGLISH LANDLORD IN IRELAND.— TlieEail and Countess of Portsmouth, with their two eldest children, Lady Catherine Wallop and Lord Lymington.bave been visiting the Royal Agricultural Society of Ireland's Show at Wexford. Lord Portsmouth's Irish estate has long been pointed at as a model of prudent and enlightened management, and of the success which attends truly liberal dealing between landlord and tenant. His lordship's father, the lato patriotic Newton Pellowes of the Devon " Reforms days," had scrupulously carried out the principle of Teuaut-Right, and the result has been that for fifty years there has been a most cordial feeling of liarmony between landlord and tenant, aud an entire absence of those agrarian disturbances which have been the bane and curse of some parts of the Green Island. Tne system of tenancy is vastly ditfercnt in the two countries. lu Ireland the tenant erects the buildings and fences the laud. lie has to put a considerable portion of capital necessary to farm, the estate, and without a legal protection would have to leave that c:ipital on quitting it. Individual improvidence ofteu rendered the best-heartel landlord unable to do his duty in protecting a tenant who had relied on his good feeling. Where creditors got " the pull" of the estate the_ landlord was powerless to do justice to the legitimate expectations of tenants, and this brought on the state of things which rendered the Gladstone legislative remedy necessary. Such were Lord Portsmouth's merits as a landlord and a legislator that we believe we reveal no secret in stating that the late Prime Minister wished to reward Jiim with the covetable dignity of " the Garter" in token of his respect for the noble Earl's patriotic merits. But the self-denying spirit of the noble Earl led him to decline the proffered honour, wishing the great Minister to have the means of bestowing it, not where it would be more deserved, certainly, but where it might be more serviceable to the interests of the State. Lorl Portsmouth not long since brought, at great expense, a boun- tiful supply of water to the town of Enniscorthy for the free use of the inhabitants, lu taking the young Lord to Ireland the Earl aud Countess are giving the best practical lesson of the great duties of proprietorship, aud how by wise administration they may be made to conduce to the happiness and prosperity of all couccrned. — T/te ff'esfern Times. THE EASTERN COUNTIES LOCK-OUT.— The lock- out lasted 18 weeks, and cost the National Union aloue about £25,000. There were altogether 2,400 men locked out, and of these 400 have migrated and 410 emigrated, and 870 returned to work without giving up their Union tickets. Since the resolution of the Executive of the National Union not to continue the lock-out pay, an additional 350 lueu have returned to work for their old masters, several have left the Union, and 340 out of the original 3,400 are still unemployed. The Union Secretary attributed tUe defeat sustained iu the Eastern Cuuuties of three causes — want of union among the men themselves, the lueked-out men refusiug to uiigrdte, and thus becoming a. burden on tlie funds, aud the iudiscreet admission into the Union of worn-out old men, who expected that they were to derive annuitieslrom its funds. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 197 MR. PROUT AND HIS SYSTEM. Temple Bar is tumbliug down ; and those who go to see the last of it may miss, as we did the other day, a small unpreteudiug chemist's shop, on the Strand side, where you can buy a box of Blair's pills, a precious oint- ment, or any other ready-made medicament. There is none of that magnificence in the way of height, width, plate glass and mahogany polish, with which Mechi and Co. give a grace even to Regent Street ; but it is, as history tells us, from these small City dens that men com- mand Space for their lakes, their parks' extended bounds ; Space for their horses, equipage and hounds. From over the narrow counter or in the little back" parlour do they cherish and establish the after-life when they shall have herds and flocks, and flowers and grateful shade. But our near neighbour at Temple Bar, when he takes to himself a place in the country, counts upon no such conventional enjoyments. He has few horses, he has no houads ; he has not an Alderuoy from which to make his own butter, nor a Southdown whereof he can borrow a leg of mutton. He cultivates but scant flowers, and has carefully contrived how there shall be as little grateful shade as possible, for he has so broken his bounds that his domain is an extended plain of plough lands, without a hedge to intercept the view, and with scarcely a tree to relieve the prospect. The pastorals of Blount's farm have been swept away with the fences. The curly-headed plough-boy no longer whistles o'er lea, for the whhtle of one of Fowler's engines is the only signal now heard on the headland ; Corydou has pawned his crook, and Phyllis has gone into domestic service. The world, in a word, has been turned upside down, and the harvest-home feast is cele- brated before a sheaf of corn is cut, in a goodly granary where grain is never stored. From all sides we have the promise of a great wheat year ; taking England throughout, the prospects are almost everywhere put above the average ; while from the Continent the reports of France, Belgium, Germany, and further on are equally favourable. And in such a year Mr. Thomas Scott, who publishes periodically his opinions on the crops, makes this emphatic declaration : " I have visited Mr. Front's farm in Herts, aud Mr. jMiddlediteh's in Wilts, where deep steam cultivation is substituted for live stock and manure, and I must say that their wheat crops surpass anything I have seen or heard of this season. Either of these gentlemen might challenge England for wheat crops." This is a big word, no doubt, as the palpable moral would be that farmers who wish to grow great crops of wheat should grow them year after year, as Mr. Front does in Hertfordshire and Mr Middleditch does iu Wiltshire. It is very probable that Mr. Scott's statement is over-coloured, or, at the utmost, there is not much proof in it, until we know how much Mr. Scott really has seen, and how far he is justified in launching a comparison with all England. Naturally, however, the issue of such a challenge provoked to judge for ourselves, and ou Tuesday joined a party at lunch in the granary to taking part in a procession which followed Mr. Swordcr to sell as they stood " the excellent growing crops of corn on Blount's Farm, Sawbridge- worth, by direction of John Prout, Esq." In another part of this day's paper we give the results ; that is the number of lots oU'ered, and the price per acre at which the wheat and oats were sold. The average reached was said not to be quite so high as last year, but it must be desire last we previous borne iu mind, that with the promise of so generally good a season, there was not so much room for specula- tion, while the expenses of harvesting may be fairly calculated at something more than they have been Everybody, however, agreed, previous visitors aud near neighbours, that the crops had never looked better ; some of the llevits were capital, and almost everywhere good ; whilst the oats, if patchy in places, were set-oil' by many a show-piece, which might have gone to warrant Mr. Scott's All-England challenge. The land was remarkably clean, and those who knew it the best and longest were the first to declare that it was worth comparatively little or nothing until it came into INIr. Prout's posses- sion ; the secret of whose success has been the ability to do as he liked with his own, by draining the laud, by clearing the way for the steam-plough, and continuing it in crop so long as he chose ; while his aid in the way of renovation has been the use to the extent of some £2 or £3 per acre of certain artificial manures. Assuming, as we are certainly so far justified in doing, the legitimate success of Mr. Prout's system of taking crop after crop, it is nevertheless scarcely one which can be offered as an example, for the very simple reason that but few other farmers have the power to follow it out. Indeed, perhaps, the most noticeable feature in the day's proceedings was the demonstration made at luncheon in favour of Teaant-Right and open coveuauts. Mr. Scott, who was in the chair, broached the subject ; and Mr. Prout declared that " the question would have to be dealt with next Session. He would accept of no measure which did not include the 12th clause, and he could show how by going for it landlords might increase their rent-rolls by 25 per cent." Mr. Middleditch went further still, and said that " few of the landlords of this country were fit to have tenants. He himself farmed an estate which was mortgaged up to the last farthing — up to the hilt, but he would never become a tenant-farmer ; he would rather break stones on the road." Mr. Corbet, the author of the prize essay on Tenant-Right, was also called on, the general tone of a very suggestive discussion turning ou the necessity for security of capital and freedom of action, the latter point being especially appropriate to the occasion. Indeed, when we compare what was said here with the more general run of agricultural utterances, we question whether the Hertfordshire farmers ever heard so many home truths in so short a time ; though the s))eakers, like Mr. Prout's practice, may be in advance of the age. SALE OF MR. T. E. MIDDLEDITCH'S STANDING CROPS, At Broad Blunsden, Swi>'don, on July 23rd. By MR. DORE. Lot. a. r- P- Trice per acre. 1 Crop of Rivet cone wheat, with straw 3 0 15 ... £17 0 0 3 Ditto 3 1 38 ... 17 0 0 3 Ditto 3 3 19 ... 17 2 6 4 Ditto 4 0 4 ... 1(5 17 G 5 Ditto 4 2 11 ... 10 0 0 6 Dhto 5 0 18 ... 9 7 G 7 Crop of April wheat ........ 5 3 la ... 80 0 8 Crop of iUvct cone wheat, with straw 5 2 37 ... 7 0 0 9 Ditto 3 0 IJ ... 17 0 0 IU Ditto 4, 1 32 ... 14 7 0 11 Ditto 4 1 25 ... 15 0 0 12 Ditto 3 3 36 ... 14 2 G 198 Lot. a. 13 Ditto 4 14 Ditto 4 15 Ditto 5 16 Ditto 5 17 Ditto 6 18 Ditto 5 19 Ditto 4 20 Ditto 5 21 Ditto 5 22 Ditto 5 23 Ditto 6 24 Ditto 4 25 Ditto 4 26 Ditto 4 27 Ditto 4 28 Ditto 3 29 Ditto 3 30 Ditto 4 31 Ditto 5 32 Ditto 5 33 Ditto 5 34 Ditto 3 35 Ditto 7 36 Ditto 5 37 Ditto 5 38 Ditto 4 39 Ditto 5 40 Ditto 7 41 Ditto 5 42 Ditto 4 43 Ditto 4 44 Ditto 4 45 Ditto 5 46 Ditto 5 47 Ditto 5 48 Ditto 4 49 Ditto 5 50 Ditto 6 51 Crop of black Tartariau oats with straw 6 52 Ditto a 53 Crop of Biddell's imperial wheat, with straw 6 54 Ditto 5 55 Ditto 6 56 Ditto 6 57 Ditto 3 58 Ditto 5 59 Ditto 4 60 Ditto 5 61 Ditto 7 62 Ditto 4 63 Ditto 3 64 Ditto 4 65 Ditto , 3 66 Ditto 3 67 Ditto 4 68 Ditto 3 [Lots 69, 70, 7 1 , 72, 73, 74 of Biddell' 75 Ditto 4 76 Ditto 4 77 Ditto 5 78 Ditto 5 79 Ditto 5 80 Ditto 5 81 Ditto 4 82 Ditto 5 83 Ditto 4 84 Ditto 4 85 Ditto 4 86 Ditto 4 87 Ditto 4 88 Ditto 4 89 Ditto 4 90 Ditto 5 91 Ditto 5 92 Ditto 3 93 Ditto 4 94 Ditto 3 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. r. p. 0 38 3 14 0 20 1 8 0 18 0 33 1 8 0 23 0 7 0 34 0 8 3 20 2 0 0 32 0 15 3 17 3 38 2 23 0 18 1 6 3 4 0 20 3 12 3 30 0 28 1 39 1 30 2 2 2 11 1 32 0 37 0 20 3 15 2 10 1 36 3 4 2 34 3 35 2 20 1 18 3 3 3 8 1 38 0 33 2 7 0 29 0 2 2 6 3 23 3 25 1 10 0 16 2 27 3 wheat 0 8 3 6 1 11 2 30 1 2 2 24 3 13 1 14 3 13 4 0 6 22 26 38 19 16 20 26 2 9 10 Price per acre. ... 13 2 6 ... 11 10 0 ... 11 0 0 ... 12 5 0 ... 11 0 0 ... 3 12 6 ... 4 0 0 ... 4 2 6 ... 4 0 0 ... 4 0 0 ... 4 5 0 ... 4 12 6 ... 4 12 6 ... 17 5 0 ... 8 0 0 ... 8 7 6 ... 8 7 6 ... 8 10 0 ... 9 17 6 ... 9 15 0 ... 9 5 0 0 0 5 0 ... 10 0 0 ... 10 0 0 ... 9 5 0 ... 8 17 6 ... 8 17 6 ... 5 0 0 ... 4 5 0 ... 6 0 0 ... 6 0 0 ... 14 2 6 ... 14 5 0 ... 10 15 0 .. 10 0 0 ... 14 5 0 ... 14 7 6 7 Not put .'.'.) up- ... 13 0 0 ... 13 7 6 ... 13 0 0 ... 8 0 0 ... 7 0 0 ... 7 0 0 ... 6 7 6 ... 7 15 0 ... 6 10 0 ... 9 10 0 ... 9 13 6 ... 10 15 0 ... 9 13 6 ... 9 10 0 ... 9 10 0 ... 9 5 0 withdrawn.] ... 8 5 0 ... 9 0 0 ... 10 3 6 ... 11 0 0 ... 11 13 6 ... 12 7 6 ... 11 3 6 ... 10 17 6 ... 11 0 0 ... 11 10 0 ... 13 3 6 ... 13 0 0 ... 11 7 6 ... 13 0 0 ... 11 15 0 ... 8 13 6 ... 9 0 0 ... 8 2 6 ... 9 3 6 ... 9 5 0 Aftermath. [Sainfoin to be fed up to the 1st day of October next, by sheep hurdled upon the land.] 95 Lattermath of sainfoin 5 3 4 4 4 7 4 96 Ditto 97 Ditto 98 Ditto 99 Ditto 100 Ditto 101 Ditto .5 3 0 0 3 0 0 4 10 0 SALE OF MR. PROUT'S STANDING CROPS. At Blount's Farm, Sawbridgeworth, Herts, on Tuesday, July 28tu. By MR. G. E. SWORDER. Lot. a. r. p- Price per acre. 1 Crop of Revit wheat, with the straw 8 0 0 ... £\0 10 0 2 Ditto 8 0 0 ... 10 5 0 3 Ditto 9 0 0 ... 9 10 0 4 Ditto 9 0 0 ... 9 0 0 5 Crop of black Tartarian oats with the straw 10 0 0 ... 8 5 0 6 Ditto 10 0 0 ... 8 17 6 7 Ditto 10 0 0 ... 9 5 0 8 Ditto 10 0 0 ... 10 2 6 9 Ditto 8 0 0 ... 10 15 0 10 Ditto 8 0 0 ... 10 15 0 11 Ditto 8 0 0 ... 10 17 6 13 Crop of mixed wheat 5 0 (» ... 7 0 0 13 Crop of second-cut clover ... 8 0 0 ... 3 3 6 14 Ditto 9 0 0 ... 3 3 6 15 Crop of Revit wheat 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 10 0 16 Ditto ... 10 10 0 17 Ditto ... 10 2 6 18 Ditto 8 0 0 ... 8 15 0 19 Ditto 0 0 ... 8 15 0 20 Ditto 10 0 0 ... 10 3 6 21 Ditto 9 0 0 ... 10 5 0 22 Ditto 9 0 0 ... 10 15 0 23 Ditto 0 3 0 ... 6 0 0 34 Crop of second-cut clover ... 13 0 0 ... 2 15 0 25 Ditto 8 0 0 ... 3 12 6 26 Ditto 8 0 0 ... 4 2 6 39 Crop of red wheat 10 0 0 ... 9 15 0 30 Ditto 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 7 6 31 Ditto 9 2 6 33 Ditto ... 8 15 0 33 Ditto 11 0 0 ... 10 2 6 34 Ditto 10 0 0 ... 10 7 6 35 Ditto 10 0 0 ... 10 17 6 36 Ditto Revit wheat 11 0 0 ... 10 10 0 37 Ditto 8 0 0 ... 9 2 6 38 Ditto 8 0 0 ... 8 12 6 39 Crop of red wheat 11 0 0 ... .10 10 0 40 Ditto 13 0 0 C Bt. in at •••; 10 10 0 41 Crop of Revit wheat 9 0 0 C Bt. in at -in 5 0 ... 13 5 0 43 Ditto 10 0 0 43 Ditto 11 0 0 ... 13 10 0 44 Ditto 11 0 0 ... 15 0 0 45 Ditto 11 0 0 ... 15 0 0 46 Ditto 11 0 0 ... 15 0 0 47 Ditto 11 0 0 ... 15 0 0 48 Ditto 4 0 0 C Bt. in at •••^.17 15 0 49 Ditto 10 0 0 ... 10 0 0 50 Ditto 10 1 0 0 ... 10 5 0 Tota £4,628 5 0 THE FARMEK'S MAGAZINE. 199 EAST LOTHIAN FARMERS' CLUB. CO-OPERA.TION. At the raoatlily raeeliug Mr. George Harvey, Wliittiahame Mains, presided, and introduced the subject, " How far a system of co-operation in regard to the purchase of manures, seeds, and feeding cakes could be carried out amongst farmers by direct purchase." Mr.HARVBY said that while he thought the principle of direct purchase a correct one, the farmers of Scotland would not com- bine to have it carried out. At present the farmers were very much at the mercy of seedsmen, some of them of repute, and some of them not. He thought it was exceedingly diffi- cult to get the Scottish farmers to combine in any sensible thing whatever. He referred them as a proof of what he said to the poor support he got from the farmers at the last meet- ing of the Highland Society in regard to the chemical depart- ment. There was a meagre attendance of farmers at that meeting. He looked in vain for any of the members of their own club excepting Mr. Smith, Whittinghara, Mr. Paton, Staudingstones, and Mr. Durie. When so much necessity existed for a first rate chemist it was a shame that so few farmers came forward to support the proposal to have one appointed. He asked the Hon. Mr. Strutt to open the discus- sion. The Hon. H. C. Strutt (Saltcoats) said they all knew what co-operation was — the combination of a number of buyers of any commodity to procuie that commodity either from the manufacturers or from the wholesale merchants at wholesale prices. Besides the diminished cost of the articles, there was this advantage that the fewer hands the goods went through tliere was the less chance of adulteration, and it was all the more easy to obtain an analysis of any sample. The simplest form of society would he for a number of farmers to join together, and say at the beginning of the year what quantity of manures and cakes and feeding stuffs they would require, and then let them appoint a committee or a salaried manager to make the best bargain for these articles with the wholesale merchants and manufacturers. la this way he believed they would be able to effect a saving of from 15 to 20 per cent. There was a society which supplied seeds, manures, cakes, and machines. That association sold manures, which were mixed according to the advice of agricultural chemists, and they chartered ships to bring across cotton-cake, seeds, &c., from America. The principle on which that association carried on its business was not to sell the commo- dities at a remarkably cheap rate, but at the minimum prices charged by respectable dealers. The shares of the association were £1 each, and 5 per cent, was given on the capital. Of the net profits last year, one-fifth went towards paying the interest on the capital, and four-fifths were divided amongst the buyers in proportion to the amount of their purchases. He had heard it objected that tiiis system would interfere with the division of labour, and take away the livelihood from many dealers. He liked the maxim of " Live and let live," but in the present condition of matters farmers must in the first instance look to get a living themselves. If farming was a prosperous trade they might suffer a few parasites to live upon them ; but this was not the case, for the farmers had quite a hard enough battle to keep themselves above water. They had also heard the objection stated by Mr. Harvey, that the Scotch, especially the farmers, were rather backward in taking up any new scheme, in fact thought it too much trouble to com- bine. The Chairman : I did not say too much trouble. The Hon. Mr. Strutt : That is my inference from what you said. The farmers must take the trouble in these days of greatly increased cost of production, compared with the price of the produce. There is great pressure from below by the movements of the labourers, and unless the farmers bestir themselves they cannot keep the equilibrium. It miglit be said they could press on the landlords. Well, that cannot be done just now, because the landlord has got his lease to protect him. The farmers must really see to their own in- terests. Mr. Douglas (Athelstaneford) thought the subject of co- o^eratioa might be the means of saving the farmers some money, provided it could be properly worked. In East Lothian . he said, the farmers laid out a great deal of money on artificial manures, whicli they could not do without, because the home- made manure formed such a small bulk that they must make it up with artificial stuffs, and it was important that they should get a genuine material at a fair market price. It was most essential that these manures should be analysed, so that the farmers might know what they were buying, but he had been informed that if ttiey subjected a certain manure to three or four different chemists, they were likely to find a great varia- tion in the analyses. If that was so it was apt to lessen their confidence in chemistry. At the same time, chemistry was a well-accredited science, and with a painstaking man some- thing like a correct opinion might be formed of the true value of the article. He did not like to speak rashly, but he was much afraid that they were spending a deal of money for insufficent value. He mentioned the case of a field of his own. In a large field of 50 acres growing swedes he had 4- acres in the centre, which got a mixture of artificial manures of an equal money value to that bestowed on the remainder of the field. Well, that small spot of four acres grew no better crop than though no manure at all had been applied ; and it was noticeably deficient, not only in that, but in successive crops. He spoke to the party who supplied tiie manure, and he got out of the matter by saying : " That was strange, for So-and- so used the same material with the best results." There was no question that that manure was a bad one, and occasioned him a good deal of loss. If the farmers were to co-operate, they could buy ]at first hand ; but they would be liable to bad debts, and still be subject to be imposed upon, al- though they bought wholesale, unless they had a competent chemist to guide them. He feared that the farmers would not go heart and hand into the co-operative principle ; and in the meantime thought they should protect themselves by having the manure tested by a man in whom they had thorough con- fidence. While he did not object to co-operation, he thought it would take so much machinery and supervision to manage such a system thit it would be more suitable for a company than a body of farmers to go into it. When so much was re- quired in the way of artificials, something should be done to enable the farmers to get value for their money. Mr. Durie (Barney Mains) said the principle of co-operation would be beneficial if they could only get farmers to combine. But a difficulty arose in so far as many of the manure agents and middle-men were retired farmers, and if this occupation was gone what would become of those men ? They would fall on the poor roll. A nobleman once asked him what became of all the retired farmers, for liis lordship could never see any of them ? He (Mr. D.) replied that they sold manures, and sometimes finished up by selling cart grease. After the collapse of the Farmers' Association for the sale of manures, recently formed in Edinburgh, he had no hope of anything of the kind succeeding. In the Haddington market there were often more manure and seed agents than farmers. If it paid these men to go about in that way the farmers might liave some idea how much above the actual value of the stuffs they were charged before such expensive machinery could be supported. The best thing to do he thought was for a few farmers, or say that Club, to unite among themselves and through a secretary get ssme thirty or forty tons of a certain manure among them direct from the manufacturers, oa a guaranteed analysis. Mr. Robertson (Newmains) said there was no denying that they had great reason for combining in order to protect ttiem- selves ; but so far as his experience had gone, he must say thia, that he hud found no task more difficult tlian the attempt to get farmers to combine together. They might almost as soon think to wash a black man white as expect to get farmers to unite. If they could combine to get the feeding stuffs and manures analysed more than tliey did just now they would help one another a great way, and the best combination was for a few to join together and get the articles from the wholesale dealers. Mr, Sh[RB£ff (Saltcoats) said that manures, ia going from 200 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. liand to hand, did not improve in quality, and the times were such that the farmers must protect themselees. Rents were high, and tliere was much money spent in inferior manures which ought not to be, and could ill he afforded. He hoped that the tendency of this discussion would he to direct more attention to the quality and price of manures and feeding-stuffs, and that it would exercise a beneficial result. Mr. T. S. Macdo^'AD (Craigielaw) factor for Lord Wemyfs, said he started a co-operative association in the South of Scot- land about sixteen years ago. Knowing the adulterations practised all over the country, from what he saw in Professor Anderson's laboratory, he called the farmers together and showed how they could protect themselves. The plan they adopted was for each farmer to give in a list of the manures he would require for a season, and then they contracted with a manufacturer to supply the articles, which were stipulated to contain a certain percentage of phosphates and ammonia. By this system they could save some 20s. to 30s. per ton, be. sides secure genuine articles. The society was still in existence. hut the manure agents h;iJ encroached considerably on its ranis latterly. Ey dealing with all the ageats in the country the farmers would get a great deal of rubbish. The Cn\iRMA.N said the discussion had been an interesting one, and they had landed just about where they commenced. A great deal had been said about getting a proper and trust- worthy analysis of the artificial stuffs. That was very desirable, lie remembered once visiting at a farm not one hundred miles from Haddington, when the farmer said, " I don't know what is the matter with the cake," pointing to a certain sample, " the sheep are not eating it." lie advised the farmer to send the cake to Dr. Anderson for anaylsis, which was done. It cost £10 a ton, and the report of Dr. Anderson was that it was not worth £5 a ton, and was perhaps dangerous to give to sheep. There was a great deal of wild mustard in it. Well, that cake was never paid for, excepting one ton. The farmers would never be right unless they had a chemist in whom tliey could place thorough confidence. THE GALAWATER FARMERS' ON THE CONTINENT. CLUB. At the quarterly meeting in the Town Hall, Stow, Mr. Frier, of Cathpair, in the chair — Mr. Thomas Swan, Edinburgh, read a paper on " Impres- sions from a Seven Days' Trip on the Continent." A difference in the temperature is perceptibly fr.dt immediately on landing in France, the atmosphere being pure and mild. On to Lille the land is rich, deep soil, well-farmed, but en- tirely in strips or patches, many different crops being grown in one field. The country, however, is void of fences, excepting wide and deep ditches or canals, upon which traific is carried in small scows or cobles ; these traverse the entire country. Towards Blaindeau the crops are in larger patches, and look well, though beginning to suffer from want of rain. Here the entire passengers alight, and the luggage (except such as is booked through) subjected to a slight and polite examination as entering Belgium. Here, as in France, the railway-porters use a horn for instructing the driver — one, two, or three blasts indicating the signal, which possesses greater advantages than the silent system prevalent here, so frequently misunderstood or disregarded. Passing on to Brussels, which we simply skirt, sufficient is seen in the distance to assure us of its natural beauty of situation, while its environs through which we travel are particularly pretty ; and here, as in France, and indeed througiiout the Continent, special care seems to be bestowed on the trees, nearly every main road being avenued by rows of poplars, affording shelter against the weather in all seasons. The staple crops appear wheat and rye, besides various descriptions of luxuriant clovers. Neither in France nor Belgium are oats or barley grown to any extent, while the red land we took to be intended at that time for beet or turnips. Reaching Liege at gloaming, we can only trace its importance by the glare from the numerous furnaces and works in full blast. Thence to Verviers, where a comfortable dinner is provided, we recah Cologne at ILIO, or fifteen hours' hard travelling from London. Neither in France nor Belgium, except on some isolated meadows, are many cattle or sheep grazing, the former being principally milk cows. The latter country, so far as we saw, not only si cms particularly fine, but also splendidly farmed ; the soil deep, and carrying weighty crops of all descriptions. The immense population, and their ■well-to-do appearance, ars also noticeable. Two, and some- times four, horses, are employed in the drays and carts, which are principally four-wheeled, while dogs are likewise used in harrows or light hurleys. Comfortably housed at the Hotel du Nord, we, before breakfast, visited the celebrated Catliedral of Cologne, upon which a large number of workmen have for years been engaged in restoring. This, excepting St. Peter's at Rome, is the largest in Europe, and is a magnificent build- ing. After a slight survey of the town — which is the reverse of prepossessing, and where the English-speaking traveller is waylaid by touts, who volunteer their services as guides over the cathedral, or to show him the bond fide establishment at which to obtain eau de Cologne (a reply in German was quite sufficient to show them we were not in want of their services) breakfasted, at which a couple of our friends thoroughly en- joyed a salmon steak. The sight of such a well-kuowu dish in the bill of fare at once attracted their attention, for which the modest sum of 21s. was debited us. The waiter smilingly assured us it was " r>,liine salmon ;" and yet, though it was pronounced excellent, it was barely considered value for the money, being at least 30s. per lb. Leaving Cologne at 9.40 a.m., and crossing the magnificent bridge which here spans the Rhine into AYestphalia — the land in which province seems lighter and scarcely so well farmed as that hitherto passed, but barley is more plentifully grown — proceeding north, pass Dusseldorf, an important town, we come into a wide mineral district, some of the stations being crowded by well-dressed workpeople, it being evidently a holiday. 90 per cent, of the men were smoking, with pipes of all sizes and shapes, and so far as we noticed in our travels only one man appeared to be under the influence of drink. As we get north towards Hanover, the scenery partakes more of the English character, fences dividing the fields, while cattle are more generally grazed and better bred than those we have yet seen. By a long ascent we reach Bielefeld, situated on a ridge of hills, and the scat of great linen manufactories — surprise being ex- pressed by the natives that its importance in this respect had never been heard of by us. Descending the hill, the viey from the train being extensive, we reach Minden, a strongly- fortified town, tlie platform of which is crowded with officers, whose ji/ii/sirji/e and soldisr-like appearance contrasted favour- ably with those of France or Belgium. Lunched here, and the loquacious waiter endeavoured to teach us a lesson in Qnanee by modestly retaining something like Is. 5d. out of the change ; eventually, on checking it, we found even then he had a balance in his favour. The revenue of this class must be greatly increased by the opportunity afforded them by English travellers, ignorant alike of the language and currency, and they seem perfectly able and willing to take advantage of it. The land here seems in fewer hands ; fields and crops in much larger acreage ; while sheep, in flocks of 200 to 500, and cattle in lots of 50 to 100, are grazing; and batches of 2o to 40 outworkers occasionally observed at work ou the drilled crops. Dined at Hanover, where the changes were again attempted to he rung on us — this time ineffectually. We got into a great stretch or poor land, a large proportion of which is valueless ; in fact, all the way to Hamburg the country is tame and uninteresting. Twelve hours from Cologne we cross the Elbe by two splendid bridges, and reach Hamburg — the scene caused by the rush for luggage, cabs, and the shouting in all languages, being astonish- ing. In Hamburg, we spent Sunday visiting the prin- cipal parts of this fine city. Sailed up the Alster, dining at LThlenhost, where a splendid band added to the beauty of the situation, and, Sunday though it was, contributed much to our enjoyment ; left Hamburg at 9.30 p.m., through Holstein, for Kiel. A rush for berths, which, close and uncomfortable, we gladly relinquished for the more airy cabin. Crossing the THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 201 belts, wfi ivach Kersce, in Zeeland, and here a totally different system of stock-feeding is observable ; the cattle and sheep beinff all tethered, principally in uuiforin lines extending parallel along the fields, those fattening lia\ii:g t!ie front line, and shifting gradually forward to be supplemented by tliose in the second stage. In Zeeland and J^uncn sometimes 100 to 150 dairy cows are seen thus tethered, explaining the capa- bilities of the country so far as the production of butter is con- cerned, lleaeliing Copenhagen at eleven, and fulfilling some engagements there, we take the steamer for Aarhuus at G p.m., whieli is crowded by people proceeding to the show ; the captain, however, kindly placed his state room at our disposal. After ten hours' run up the Sound and acoss the Cattegat, we arrive at 4< a.m., accommodation being provided, and in- structions that the judges were to meet at 8 a.m. in tlie com- mittee rooms, into wliich the Cavalry Riding School bad been transferred. Here the directors, committee, judges, and attend- ing members were allocated to their respective posts, eacli section containing an English judge. The stock is completely catalogued, and the classes are distinguished by letters, not by numbers, as in this country. The arrangements were most complete, one side of the yard being allotted to the native, the other to the cross or mixed breeds, and include single auiraals as well as classes for lots. The only, to me, defective part of the arrangements being that in the latter classes, which contained from two to six animals, you were asked to judge them as a lot, and frequently a larger lot, which con- tained better auiraals individually than the smaller, was thrown from the average not being so good. It was proposed that we should base our decisions according to points of merit — the greatest number of points taking the prizes. I observe a similar mode of judging breeding animals was recently inaugu- rated by Lord Kinnaird at the Kinross show ; but in the judging of fat cattle we speedily discovered this system un- workable. After awarding the society's prizes, those donors of special prizes who were judges retired, finding a substitute to act for them — mine being Mr. Elliott of Hollanbush. The awards being finished, the whole engaged breakfasted together, one or two toasts of a national character were given. The rest of the day is devoted to the inspection of the stock, and while the native breeds are not open to much, if any improvement, I was greatly struck by the immense strides the production of Shorthorns has wronglit since (in 1866) I last visited Jutland. The Jutland cattle are famous dairy stock, and when well-fed are really good cattle. Though somewhat light of flesh, they have the objection that as a rule they cannot be made prime before four or five years old. The average value of the whole of this class I took to be about £2G each. In our annual reports to the Danish Government for the last few years, we have advocated the benefits to their native breeds the introduction of Shorthorn blood would effect; and thougli in many cases a prejudice existed in favour of maintaining their present breed intact, they not unreason- ably believe that by producing meat they might sacrifice the milking properties of their native cows ; and butter is an immense source of income there. During the show there were various discussions on the subject, while those who advocated it had a powerful help iu the great superiority shown by the crossed over the native breeds, and the advan- tage of such crossing is now generally admitted. The best animal in the yard was pronounced a first cross ; while two other animals, a first and second cross, sold at £130. About 60 of those shown possessed merit of no mean degree. A dinner — still confined to those engaged during the day — was given by the Committee, at which about eighty, sat down. The speeches were not of a national character, being mostly confined to subjects connected with the meeting, and, as is customary in Denmark, were delivered during the dinner. The evening was occupied by a trip to the forest, whei'e the utmost cordiality was shown to the visitors from this country. Wednesday, at eleven, the prizes were awarded — a procession headed by a capital baud, which played during the show, marching from the committee-room to the further end of the yard, where a platform was erected, each successful com- petitor coming up in front of his cattle which took the prizes, and passing aside after receiving them. After this there was a sale of imported Shorthorns, the property of Mr. Troldahl, most of which were sent from the Southern Central Sale in May. These were eagerly competed for, and made high prices. At four o'clock a general dinner took place, at which about 350 of the leading landowners, farmers, and others interested were present. The gist of the speeches related to the introduction of any systems likely to improve their country, and throughout one could not help observing the intense nationality of the Danes. This over about eight o'clock, and as it to give a practical finish to the show, the stock was removed and shipped to London, Newcastle, and Leitli, in steamers waiting specially for the pur- pose. Other engagements unfortunately prevented our accepting an invitation to inspect the model farms of Consul-General Pontoppidaw, where a large party met. We left Aarhuus about 11p.m. on the Wednesday evening, via Fredericia and Nyborg, tlirough Fuuen, admirably farmed, and aptly termed the Garden of Denmark ; crossed the Great Belt to Ivorsce, reaching Copenhagen in time to see the cattle market. The stocks here at this season were principally rough-class cattle, the quotations being guided by the state of the English markets. The pigs shown were generally first- class. Spent Thursday pleasantly in Copenhagen, which, like Edinburgh, is intersected by tramways ; but here the authori- ties have paid some respect to the amenity of the streets — the cars, where practicable, being rnn on the side of the roadway, and not on the centre of the streets as here. Visited Tivoli, and had an insight into the social enjoyments of the people. Went on Friday to Mr. Petersen's farm, near Copenhagen, which, as criticised by my friends, was well farmed, and worked by the best English implements. Left Denmark by the Ice- land, from Copenhagen at G p.m., greatly pleased with our visit, and the kindness and hospitality everywhere extended us. With a three days' voyage, a good ship, and a most intelligent and obliging captain, the time at our disposal on board per- mittted us to reflect on what we had seen since leaving Scot- land. It is impossible but to observe tie application brought to bear by the foreigners on everything they undertake. Leaving Glasgow, as I did, on my way south, and passing through the great mineral districts of Scotland, the resources of our country neglected, the bulk of the furnaces out of blast, the men on strike, and many of them, notwithstanding their recent unexampled earnings, iu misery, and passing through Belgium and Germany, hitherto only recently recognised as competing mineral-producing countries, everything here con- trasted strangely favourable — the men everywhere employed, the country reflecting prosperity. Iu their futile endeavours to dictate to capital, and ignoring altogether the laws of supply and demand, by wliich uunoubtedly their remuneration must be regulated, the miners here, listening to the advice of their so-called delegates, have succeeded in driving their trade out of this country ; and judging from the capabilities of the Continent, and the less cost of labour there, they seem willing and able to keep it. Now, gentlemen, I am aware that the subject of tlie introduction of foreign stock is not altogether a palatable one, more especially at such a meeting as this, as I believe that three-fourths of the farmers and landowners of this country would have all foreign stock slaughtered at the post of debarkation. Iu this I quietly concur, so far as those countries are concerned, which permit stock from the land- board of the Continent to enter. These are at present rightly classed as infected countries, and their exports compulsorily slaughtered here. But, gentlemeu, you are all aware that your profits from cattle-feeding are, alter deducting your artificial food accounts, frequently only nominal. Tlie reason of this is, of course, the cost at which you have to buy stores, while your capabilities for fattening or wintering cattle are increasing. The area for breeding cattle is surely diminish- ing ; the rapid strides in the science of agriculture are gradu- ally penetrating into those high grass districts from which you used to derive supplies of cattle. Those now partly under tillage indirectly imply the production of meat ; hence the at present irreconcilable relative values betv.'cen lean and fat cattle. In the system now progressing in the wide cattle-pre- ducing district of Jutland, I can see shortly you may be able to calculate on an influx of really first-class cattle, and 1 venture to express the opinion that sooner or later you will gladly wel- come these as a desirable adjunct to tlie cattle-feeding supply of this country. This I the more readily advocate, seeing that those native breeds which have been recently sold in this coun- try have invariably left a more than comparative profit; but as the foreigners with shorthorns, your scruples in this respect will yet have to be overcome. On Monday at eleven o'clock the Cheviot Hills were sighted. Passing up the borders of East Lothian, looking its best, we reached Leith at three o'clock, inwardly feeling that after our progress up the Firth 20J THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. and meeting our friends on arrival, that "there is no place like home." Mr. Snow, in proposing a vote of thanks to Mr. Swan for his paper (which was cordially responded to), remarked he had no doubt that by-aud-by in crossing the Jut- land cows with good Shorthorn bulls they might get a good claas of cattle. However, this had taken a longer time than he anticipated, because it was many years since they began to introduce the Shorthorns amongst these foreign cattle ; and he did not recollect of ever having seen a lot of anything like well-storing cattle of this kind. Most of them that came over to this country had been called nomkscvijits, having no great features about them. Mr. Swan thanked the members for their acceptance of his paper, and observed that he was quite prepared to hear from his friend, Mr. Snow, in regard to these Jutland cattle, that at present they were not valuable as stores, because anyone con- versant with the different breeds of cattle would know that until they were improved they were not desirable for storing ; but in the observations which he had made in his paper, he referred to the class of cattle they were likely to get by cross- ing. As an instance of the progress being made in that direc- tion, he might say their firm (the Messrs. Swans') sent over to Jutland about fifty Shorthorn cattle this year, and the pros- pects of further importation showed that it was likely to be very much greater next year. He was sure it was perfectly apparent to every farmer in this country that it was impossible that they could produce meat to supply the increasing demands of the population, and one of the best things they could do was to encourage importation from countries where they could get lean cattle to reduce the value of the lean cattle in this coun- try. In the foreign country referred to they could not feed one-third of the cattle they bought, and the best of their Shorthorn cattle were being sent to Hamburg to feed when thev should be more likely to come here. The Chairman said he had occasion to feed these Jutland cattle and they always paid him well. Of course, for their age tliey do not grow fast, but the best of them when they got fat were most valuable animals. They were something like our West Highland cattle. AN ELOQUENT SECRETARY.— At the meeting of the Telton Agricultural Society last week a testimonial was pre- sented to Mr. Robert Donkin of Eelton, who from the first has acted as the secretary of the Society, was one of its principal promoters, and has been chiefly instrumental in bringing it to its present position. The testimonial consisted of a handsome service of silver plate. Mr. Robert Donkin, in acknowledgment, said : When he looked upon it, he could not but solemnly ask himself, " What is it I have done to have called forth such a solid testimony of public appreciation ?" In all his relations through life — and these have not been a few — he had invariably found that the most safe and sure way to arrive at either popularity or success, was to study inti- mately all the varied phases of human nature, which in no instance would be found perfect, although all were of one flesh and one blood. He thought all would admit that dispo- sitions would be found at times to vary as widely as the poles are asunder. Yet he might be pardoned for saying that with- out deviating in the least from the path of common courtesy and honour, there was, in his opinion, a conciliatory roadway, which would lead anyone successfully forward, notwithstanding any unforeseen obstacles which might arise as a huge barrier against a more smooth or honourable passage through life. It was now over forty-three years since he first saw the light of day in that immediate locality ; and during thirty-five years of that period he had a vivid recollection of uearly all that happened around him. When memory looks back o'er her record of years. Ere reason and feeling decay, Ere the footsteps we leave in this valley of teajs Are swept by oblivion away. If he looked through the vista of time, what was it that he beheld ? Pleasing recollections, dark and melancholy re- flections, flitted across his mind. Old associations clung with fervour round his heart ; but, that day, he hailed with joyous pleasure the friendship of his boyhood's youth gathered round him, while he wandered beyond the meridian of his manhood's Btage. There were those amongst them who knew him then ; and while others, dear unto him through years of unbroken friendship, and who were closely associated with him in the formation of that society, had been gathered unto their fathers, yet the memory of their worth was as dear unto him now as was the value of the friendship of those now living, and who that day did him such splendid, but such undeserved honour. It had been said that There is a tide in the affairs of men, AVhich, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune. Sliould he in that day's proceeding, discover any symptom of an evanescent How of that tide towards him, let him trust while he pursued the " even tenour of his way" he would studiously avoid plunging an indiscreet foot within its waters wliereby might be created an envious surge which in its briny bosom might swallow him. Let him hope that he would ever be found grateful for that overwhelming proof of their good will ; and while he lived that day's proceeding should remain indelibly engraved upon his heart. Whatever might be his future, their generous kindness would never be forgotten. He was conscious beyond all doubt that he was far Iroin being worthy of the magnificent honour they had bestowed upon him ; yet whatever might be the error of his ways, let hira trust that they would always find in him a sufficient amount of gratitude to well and truly appreciate the high honour they had bestowed upon him. He asked them to accept his sincere thanks for that costly expression of their regard. Might they long live to enjoy all the blessings of this life ; might that bond of friendship which that day existed betwixt them and himself, and which they had sealed with that mag- nificent impress of their good will, never be ruthlessly rent asunder. He hoped and trusted that when he was warned he must quit this stage of mortal strife, he might be enabled honourably to discharge all those obligations which he might owe to society, and to gracefully fold his humble robes around him ; and that, finally, before bidding adieu to this world, he might be permitted to cut that splendid testimony equally in twain— to hand it to his children who were as dear unto him as his own existence, and that while they lived, however humble might be their position iu this life, while they looked upon that testi- monial they might learn tlirough it that the good opinion of the world alone was a brighter inheritance than any sullied reputation resting upon a pedestal of gold. THE VICTORY OF THE EMPLOYER.— Translated into technical language, the victory of the employers means that there was in or near the scene of the struggle an extra supply of labour, or that there was an opportunity of reducing the demand. The farmers had never before desired to conduct their business according to the strict laws of the market, aud when they were forced into the struggle they could only ascer- tain by experiment the existence of a surplus of labour. It may be hoped that their just confidence, both in their own resources and in the justice of their cause, will be rewarded by a period of exemption from external hostility. Many years must elapse before a candidate for a seat in the Eastern Coun- ties will venture to declare himself in favour of an extension of tLe suffrage to the labourers. Mr. Gladstone and Mr. Trevelyan may be impressed with the anomaly of a difference of political rights depending on the place of residence ; and Mr. Disraeli may condescend to profess implicit confidence in a loyal peasantry. The Suffolk farmer will long remember the breach between himself and his men, and their implicit and exclusive confidence in the strangers who denounced the masters as tyrants. Perhaps even sentimental politicians are beginning to learn that Mr. Arch is something short of an inspired prophet or benevolent apostle. Some allowance may be made for an uneducated orator suddenly raised into noto- riety, and applauded, as demagogues are always applauded, by mobs in proportion to the extravagance of his statments and proposals ; but it must be remembered that an excuse is not a justification. After his recent speeches, Mr. Arch must take rank with the Odgers and the Bradlaughs, who are not the less mischievous disturbers of social order because their violence may sometimes admit of explanation. If the Labourer's Union had succeeded in the Eastern Counties, the economy of agriculture throughout England would have been seriously and perhapi hoplessly deranged. The alleged lowness of wages in Suffolk was, even if it had been truly described, not the real cause of the agitation, for in Lincolnshire, where wages are considerably higher than in Suffolk, a stike was arranged by the Union at the same time. Demagogues will henceforth take notice that farmers, as a class, are not easily frightened or coerced.— •rAt Saturday Review, THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 203 THE BEDFORDSHIRE PRIZE FARMS. THE GOLD-MEDAL FARM. The morning after visiting the first and second Prize Farms, some of our party, with our Captain at the head, took a drive over Mr. Charles Howard's farms. Close to the town of Bedford we came upon the Priory Farm, of ninety acres in extent, which Mr. Howard has had in hand some ten or twelve years — the subsoil of which we thought was good loam — consequently the season had not affected it so much, although some burnt patches appeared, which we were told had never been seen before on that field in the memory of a man. The first field we entered was Browick wheat, a kind which Mr. Howard has cultivated for many years, a large growth of which is sold by him rather above market price during seed-time. The next field was in roots — mangolds and swedes — late but very clean. Then we drove a couple of miles away to Biddenham, Mr. Howard's resideuce — not just now, by-the-bye, as the house is under thorough repair, and likely to be so for some time to come. Our criticising Captain finds a few faults inside the house, with which some of us agree ; but the majority of us think we should like a dwelling as good as the Manor House pro- mises to be. Having disposed of the house, we look through the homestead, which is nearly new, having been built after a fire a few years since. The arrangements on the whole are good, not exactly agreeing with all our views. We see two or three young Owynnes, probably a foundation for another herd ; it may be to beat the respectable average of seventy guineas a-piece made at Mr. Howard's Shorthoru sale some two or three years since. Leaving the premises, we meet two Frenchmen ; but can we look and nod ; though they are evidently pleased with our remarks, which can only be made by signs. Driving through the farm on a well-kept road, we notice first the crops, which are suft'eriug from the continued drought ; wheat and barley short in straw, and we fear the quality will not be very good. Mangolds show a good plant, rather late — very clean and looking healthy. At the far end of the farm we find the flock of 250 Oxford Down ewes, looking very well, though our guide tells us — " Been very short of keep." In an ad- joining close we see the ewe lambs, not looking so well or so big as they ought to do ; while on our way back we see someordinary keeping sheep, of which our sharp Captain says — " Not good enough for this farm ; don't ought to be here." We then review the ram lambs, looking very healthy, though we think hardly big enough. Our guide still tells us, " short of keep" is the reason. Something over sixty shearling rams next present themselves, which we all think show remarkably well, and bid fair to make a good average at the annual sale. The size of this farm is about 300 acres, mostly of a light gravelly soil, which this season has been affected considerably. Mr. Howard cultivates cabbage largely, without which we question very much if the shearling rams would have the " bloom" on them. Another dtive, still of two miles more, takes us to the Bromham farm, which Mr. Howard has had in hand but four years, and, as we hear, was farmed by executors for four years before that. There has been a large sum of money spent with considerable judgment and enterprise to bring this farm into its present state in so short a time ; about 450 acres in all, rather more arable than pasture laud, the latter very good. The first thing we note on this farm is a lot of very well bred Shorthorn grazing cattle, for which our Captain, who knows some- thing about grazing as well as cattle, offers 6s. per stone, a pi'ice which some of our party think would bring them to close upon £30 each. We now come to the arable land, something of an Oxford clay subsoil, which is managed, like the Biddenham farm, on the four- course shift or Norfolk system ; wheat and barley looking remarkably well ; tare land smashed up by steam- cultivator to be left till after harvest. The best field of mangolds we have seen in Bedfordshire. On another grass field were some twenty-five good Shorthorn beasts grazing — making forty, worth from £25 to £30 a- piece. Getting on to Bromham Park another flock of Oxford Downs is seen, of not quite so long a pedigree as the Biddenham ewes, but very useful in their way ; then come some more Shorthorns, and a lot of Welsh Hunts, thirty or forty of them, worth hard upon £30 a-piece ; with another score of younger animals, and calves, making altogether about 100, which we think, with the corn crops, bid fair to produce a large amount of food for the public. Wishing to have another look at the Royal show we make our visit to the Medal Farm rather short, but well pleased and satisfied with what we had seen. Mr. Howard farms altogether 850 acres — at the "Priory," 90 ; at Biddenham 310, two miles apart; and at Brom- ham 450, again two miles further on ; so that his business requires more judgment and thought than if it was all one farm ; and he is not under the Duke of Bedford. By-the bye, " the broken-backed haystack," on Mr. Checkley's first-prize farm at Brogborou§;h, did take fire, as we had expected, and came to utter grief on Sunday week, fortunately without causing any further damage. The judges, however, should surely make one more call in order to enable them to duly report on this " blaze of triumph." THE HOP AND MALT EXCHANGE. — Under au Order in Chaucery, in the case ol "Grundy v. the Hop and Malt Exchange and Warehouse Company (Limited)," the extensive premises known as the Hop and Malt Exchange, in Southwark, were submitted to public auction, in one lot, by Messrs. Marsh, Yetts, and Milaer, at the Mart, Tokenhouse- yard. The buddings occupy a ground area of 26,000 feet, the elevation being 95 feet, and the street frontage 350 feet, the total tloor area being 221,169 feet. Tlie premises were mort- gaged for £50,000, and tlie equity of redemption sold yesterday reached £27,800. Tlie value of tlie property as realised by the sale, therefore, was £77,800. The original cost of the ground on which tlie buildings stand was ^£60,000, and the erection of the premises cost £75,000, so that the price given for the whole yesterday was but little more than the original cost of the building alone, or about £3 per foot for the ground, including the premises erected upon it. THE BEDlj'ORD SHOW.— In his notices of the imple- ment and other stand? our representative for that department omitted to make any mention of that of Down's and Co., of Woburn, so well knovvn for their true Faemees' Friend, a dressing which preveuts tlie smut in wheat and stays the attacks of the slug, grub and wireworm. Our reporter had certainly instructiuus to pass over exhibitions of a not stric:ly agricultural cliaracer, whereas the labours of Messrs. Downs tend to a strictly agricultural good. THE PAST SHOW WEEK.--Mr. Marris took the second prize for aged Leicester rams at Grantham, and not Mr. Bortou, as published in tlie prize list. At the East of England horse show Messrs. PliiUips, Smith and Co.'s pony in addition to a high commendation took, as we are advised, a cup and medal for " speed action and /lif/h condition." This last point of merit is something of a novelty. 204. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. MAIDSTONE FARMERS' CLUB. HORSE vci-sifs STEAM POWER. At a recent meeting Mr. B. S. Wilmot, of Goudhurst, spoke to this subject, Mr. T. B. Lovett presided, and Mr. J. Paine occupied the vice-chair. Mr. Wilmot said that when he was first invited to read a paper to the members of the Club he hesitated for two reasons ; first, because he remembered that they had already discussed most of the principal subjects connected with agriculture during the time he had known the Club ; and, secondly, be- cause he was mainly and almost entirely a book farmer, not having been born a farmer, and having taken to it somewhat late in life — learning all he knew by copying others and by reading. They might, therefore, feel sure that he hesitated to read a paper to the Club relating to agriculture, yet he could not help thinking that if he could help to raise a discussion for the purpose of bringing about any good to otliers and himself, it was his duty to do so. Among the questions connected with agriculture he had tried to find that which was most prominent, and one of the most diflBcult matters with which the farmer had to deal ; he also tried to fix upon a subject upon which he knew there was a great difference of opinion, and he hoped that he should hear a good discussion upon the paper he had written. Mr. Wilmot then read the .following address : The subject before us is one of deep interest and importance — both to the public at large and to those individuals who are more imme- diately concerned in it. During the past few years English purchasers of horses have had painful experience of their in- creased dearness ; and this is notably the case with regard to horses employed in agriculture. The great increase in the cost of these animals does not arise from any growth of EngHsh demand, and the prevailing scarcity does not, I think, arise from any deficiency of supply. No proof exists that fewer horses are now annually produced in England than in former years. On the contrary, high prices have probably stimulated increased production, and the real cause of the pre- sent scarcity in England seems more to be found in the drain which has been made upon it by foreigners. According to the last Board of Trade return we exported 60 per cent, more horses in January and February of, this year than during the same months in 1873. The late war had a great deal to do with this, for we find that France took 40 per cent, of these ex- portations, and the present deficiency of horses in France is estimated at not less than 180,000. In the present state of the animal labour market, therefore, any plan or power that can be substibted for animal labour — doing the work erjually well and at less cost — must secure close atten- tion. The spread of education likewise powerfully induces this attention ; for as every year advances greater difficulty will of necessity be found in obtaining men to look after horses as well as boys to help them. New and more attractive sources of occupation will gradually open them- selves to these classes. The development of education is a powerful item in tlie subject before us, as is signally shown in the Western hemisphere, America having done all she can to promote the use of every kind of machinery, and thus not only to lessen animal labour, but to make labour in general less burdensome and more agreeable and intellectual ; and a great authority upon agriculture has said, " Never have a man to do what a horse can do, and never have a horse to do what a steam engine ought to do." How far, then, can we in this country substitute steam power for our present system, and upon what principles ? There are very many ways in wliich the substitution can be emplojed with great benefit to the agri- culturists in particular, and the country in general. It may be applied, as it is now almost universally, to thrashing. It may almost be applied to ploughing, as to some considerable extent has been the case already ; and the various other de- partments of farm work may, and doubtless will, as times goes on and ingenuity is exercised, be brought in some measure within its scope. I believe, for instance, that the time is fast approaching when every large farm will have its steam engine, and horse labour will, instead of being the great power for carrying on a farm, be looked upon as the mere auxiliary to steam power, just as it now is to our great railway system. Animal labour now feeds our railways and thus helps the great trade in which the country is engaged. How vast and incalculable are the benefits our railways have brought to agriculture ! Not only have they made the carriage of tlic produce of the land more easy, but they have afforded to tiie tillers of the soil easier access to all parts of the kingdom, and thus enabled them to compare notes and do business with their neighbours in dis- tricts and counties which were formerly unapproachable. And so we may look forward to some great improvement in our railway system, we may confidently consider that agricul- ture has not yet received half the benefits it will be sure to reach under a more advanced aud thoughtful management. There are, no doubt, many ways in which steam power would greatly benefit agriculture that have not yet received any attention whatever, while other improvements are in their in- fancy. Take, for instance, our traction engines. At present they are unsightly and very costly, aud in many cases are so difficult to manage with our present roads that to use them generally is ouly to cause trouble and inconvenience. But I feel sure that ihe day will come vrheu they will be of great service to this country, and to agriculture in particular, and will help to lessen the demand for heavy drauglit horses. I hope we shall likewise see some local lines of rail laid down on the tramway plan, connecting our villages and towns more closely together, only worked by steam instead of horse power. These lines might be used for the conveyance of goods as well as passengers — feeding our railways and make our produce in distant parts more valuable. I have this long time thought that a line of railway might be made by the side of our pre- sent roads at less than a tentli of the cost of making our pre- sent Hues. It is true that they might not be able to travel quite so fast, but this would perhaps be better for both pas- sengers aud those concerned in the undertaking than our pre- sent reckless travelling. We should not want the unsightly engines now used, but something neat and compact. This would, I think, benefit all classes, and I should very much like to see the Government take our present railways in their hands, in the same way that they have taken the telegraph department, and follow up the wires which now go to almost every village in Kent by a serviceable line of railway. I be- lieve in the end it would pay, because the more you facilitate the command of any nation, the greater will that nation become. In the same way in proportion as you make travel- ling easy-giving opportunities for exchange of thought and opinion — will you make the people prosperous and happy. Not only do different systems prevail in different counties, bnt in different provinces of the same county — in some cases their existence has been caused by a peculiarity of soil or climate, while in others they have arisen out of local habits, or they spring from improvements not generally kaowa, and even in the rudest districts there may be some which merit imitation. Now it is quite evident both that some of those systems must be preferable to others, and that no man can determine which is best without being acquainted with all, nor can any farmer be said to be completely master of his business, until he has attained that knowledge. It is not sufficient that he already gets what he considers a fair return for his money and industry, if by other modes of culture he could obtain more ; and if he neglects them, he injures himself, his family, and the public. In no country has husbandry been carried to higher perfection than in England, yet, even in our own land practices exist in some counties that are either wholly unknown or only im- perfectly understood in others, and it is only by comparing them that their relative usefulness can be ascertained. Farmers being necessarily much confined to their own district by the care which their business demands can rarely under our pre- sent railway system inspect many of the improvements nov? going on in farming. The subject which I have brought before you this evening is, I feel sure, of great importance to tiie whole of the community, and there can be no doubt what- ever but that it is the duty of everyone to try and substitute steam for horse power, when it can be profitably employed. The farmer has many expenses which greatly interfere with his profits, and I think I am right in saying that the following THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 205 quaiut old doggerel lines, written iu tlie early part of tlie reign of Queen Elizabeth, still hod good : ■'.One part cast for the rent due out of hand. One other part for seed to sow thy land ; One other part leave parson for his tith, Another part for harvest, sickle, syth ; One part for ploughvvrite, cartwrite, knacker and smith, One part to uphold thy teams that draw therewith ; Another part for servants and workman's wages laie. One part, hkewise, for fillbellio dale by dale, One part thy wife for needful things doth crave. Thyself and thy child the last part would have. There is no question that it is the many calls which farmers have that prevent them buying many machines which they otherwise would have, with larger profits aad more capital. Yet I think some plan of co-operation migli be more generally adopted amongst farmers, so that they might buy machines which are now beyond the reach of many to purchase, either from want of capital, or because they have not sufficient land to warrant such a large sum being expended. I have referred to steam thrashing, and have said that it is almost universal. It is, and few, if any would care to go back to the tlirashiug floor. The cuttiug of chaff also, and the cooking of all kinds of food ; the steaming of food before it is given to animals, the pumping of sewage upon land, are all of them good and useful ways in which steam power may be substituted for horse power, with profit to the farmer. In no way do I look for so much benefit as I do in the application of the steam plough, but the day, perhaps, is far distant when we may look for the universal use of the steam plough, because some farms and fields, and those of Kent in particular, are small and unsuited at present for its effective working, but the time is fast ap- proaching, I think, when agriculturists will be fully alive to the importance its use. I know a gentleman who bought a steam plough and cultivating apparatus some few years since. It was one of Fowler's, and in a conversation I had with him some short time, he said to me, " T cannot speak too highly of the benefit of steam power. I am able to plough'six acres per day, thus doing the work of six teams at a cost of about 9s. per acre. I have the advantage of being able to do it at any time and at any reasonable depth. My land before cost me about 20s. per acre for ploughing. It now costs me 9s., and then there are other great benefits arising from the system which must not be overlooked. The land can be worked at any time without fear of injury !" This is a most important matter, for in wet seasons, as we know, the treading of the soil with horses does a vast amount of injury. It is supposed that in ploughing an acre there are about a million steps taken in ploughing tlie land with an ordinary four-horse team. In the working and preparing of the seed-bed, morever, there is not nearly so much labour required after the steam plough as after the ordinary horse plough, and there can be no question that the digging apparatus must do a gr.^at deal of good upon many lands. This, through cultivation and disintegration of the soil, is of the greatest consequence, for it is thus prepared for those chemical changes which are so necessary for the full develop- ment of seed. It is generally admitted that this is as good at least as a coat of manure. I have not yet touched upon the depths to which ploughing ought to be carried, nor is it needful to say much regarding it, for this, of course, depends more upon the nature of the land, and the judgment of the farmer, than upon any general rule. The usual depth of horse ploughing is from four to six inches ; that of steam ploughing, from six to twelve inches. A notion is held that where deep cultivation is adopted more manure is ■ necessary. It will be readily admitted tliat if this idea were well founded it would form a strong argument in favour of moderate depths. It is, however, only justly applicable to land of which the subsoil is of inferior character, for when the upper and lower strata are of the same quality not only can no injury arise from gradually incorporating the two, but benefit must be derived by all plants which penetrate far into the ground. Poor soils, perhaps, should not be ploughed deep for the reason that the vCj^etative mould with wliich the sur- face of laud of that description is covered having been formed by the decomposition of the scanty herbage which grew upon it when in a state of nature, is proportionally thin, and the subsoil on which it reposes consists generally of sterile mate- rials. It would be bad policy, therefore, at all events for some time, to mix them. Many instances, however, have been re- corded, I believe, in which the subsoil when brought up to the surface and exposed for some time has proved extremely fertile, but in all those cases the earth, when chemically analysed, has been found to contain a considerable portion of carbon ; and unless afterwards sustained by a proportionate quantity of manure, its good qualities have been speedily exhausted. There are many here, perhaps, who will not fully agree with those views of mine either upon steam ploughing or deep cultivation, and I liope we shall hear the result of the practical experience of the members of this Club in the discussion which will follow tliis paper. There seems to be one thing which we ouglit to know as well as we can, viz., what return may be expected from land the subsoil of which has not yet been submitted to the plough, and what change will be occasioned by the admixture of tlie subsoil with the surface. In my own opinion, large ope- rations of the nature of which I have been speaking, and which are intended to effect a permanent improvement in the soil, cannot be considered as coming within the scope of common farming, and can only be nndertaken by the owner of the land, or on terms which will secure the tenant in the return of his outlay ; for it should be clearly undersood that in no case can it be effected without either the assistance of extraneous manure, or by the sacrifice of a portion of that which properly belongs to the usual cultivation of tiie farm, and might, therefore, pro- bably be more advantageously applied to the support of the soil already under tillage. While then I hail with pleasure the progress steam ploughing is making in this country, I am not so greatly in favour of deep cultivation as I know many to be, and I know that many Norfolk farmers who have thin and light soil, with poor and barren subsoil, argue that it is easier to keep a small quantity of soil in good condition than a greater quantity which would be formed by deep ploughing. The sub- ject of deep cultivation is a very valuable subject, and should be well considered by all tillers of the soil. In every turn in farming the farmer will find the subject of horse v. steam power presents itself. Not only will he be led to believe more firmly in the latter, from the point of having more done for less money, but he will likewise see how much depends upon it for the great- ness and good of our country. In every nation tlie condition of the people depends upon the degree of skilful labour wiiich it can command, and the plough is the prime mover of all, for until a sufficiency of food is produced for the common consump- tion there can be no prosperity to the country, for it is obvious that in proportion to the perfection of the cultivation will be the result obtained and the spare hands left for the other pur- poses. The means of support in other branches of industry being needful, the demand for the produce of the land increases along witli the increase of labour, and thus industry and wealth keep pace with agriculture, and each stimulating the other, contribute to the national weal and welfare. The CiiAiKMAJN remarked that the subject which had been brought before them was a very wide one, and he trusted that each member present would tell his own experience. His own opinion was that they must use steam more than they had done. Why could not they reap and mow by steam ? Tliey might depend upon it that the farmers would be driven to use steam more than they liad done. Mr. Stonham said that unfortunately he could not speak practically about steam ploughing, for he had never had an opportunity of getting a steam plough on his farm. He had, however, some doubt about the correctness of the statement made by Mr. Wilmot's friend as to the cheapness with which steam culture could be accomplished, for he remembered that some years ago when Mr. Aveling, who was the pioneer of steam culture in Kent, was presented with a purse of 100 g.uineas, he said that three acres could be moved for a guinea. He (Mr. Stonham) gave him a challenge to plough one acre for a guinea, and as no notice was taken of that he afterwards gave him a challenge to plough one liundred acres at the same price, but this thallenge had never been acknowledged. He lioped to have a steam plough on his farm next year, but as be liad not yet tried one lie would not say anything about the treading and stamping of the land which was incidental to horse plough- ing. With regard to deep cultivation, he agreed with Mr. Wilmot that it was possible to lay out a lot of money on deep culture, and get no benefit at all. When he and his brother were in partnership his brother had a notion that deep cultiva- tion would eff'ect a great deal, and an experiment was tried upon a piece of soapy chalk or grey chalk. Three horses were sent to plough at a moderate depth, and three were sent with a sub- soil plough, moving the subsoil four of five inches deeper than usual. He called his brother's attention to the fact that they r» 9 206 l^HE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. were using a great deal of horse labour for nothing, and said he thought they had belter spend money for manure. They cultivated half the field in the manner he described, but the result proved that the application of manures was better than subsoiling for this land. If they could manure highly, cultivate deeply, but if they could not do so, they should content them- selves with moderate penetration of the earth. Mr. Hayes said that if Mr. Wilmot had given them some strong opinions of his own they might have quarrelled with him, but he had expressed what they all hoped— that the day would come wlien the steam-engine would be at such a price, and in such a form, that they could use it more than they did now. He had used it a little and lie liked it very much. But at present they were uiiwieldly tilings, and tliey left great headlands and were dear. He had hired them and had paid £1 an acre and had to find coal ; there were other expenses which had made tlie cost go beyond a guinea per acre. If they could have them made so that a farm of a moderate size could have an engine and tackle of its own he slioald like it very much indeed. Two years ago he hired from the Staple- liurst Company an engine aad tackle, and the plough worked to and fro across tlie field witli a windlass on each sid«. If they got that tackl" they could work it themselves. Kut when lie looked at it more he found that it strained an eiglit- horse engine all to pieces, and it seemed as if it wanted a 16-horse engine. Even then it cost £1 an acre, besides coal ; with attendance and all extras it came to another 10s. If they could have steam so that they would find it was as cheap as horse-power— he would not say cheaper — he thought the Weald of Kent men would use it when the weather would allow them to do so. They could not get a steam-engine cheap enough to induce them to use it. It was not used in the Weald of Kent so much as he hoped it would have been. Mr. WUmoi's friend had told him that he could work it at 93. per acre, whereas the other system cost him £1. He (Mr. Hayes) could not understand Mr. Wilmot's friend's calculations. Mr. Punnett went in very strong for the use of steam, but there were little items which escaped his calcu- lation in the details which he gave them, and when he (Mr. Hayes) calculated the cost it caused him to have nothing to do with it, but to hire occasionally. Mr. Reeves, in referring to some questions asked respecting the Staplehurst Company, said that during the firit year of the existence of the company the steam ploughs worked in the marshes, but last year tliey did some work for farmers in the neighbourhood, and some good work was performed. The engine was now engaged at Peckhara, and therefore the com- pany was still alive, and they were likely to have plenty of work tliis summer. He believed, that the orders were very heavy, and any one who wanted the engine, &c., must look forward. He had the men to scarify a field of seven acres, and they made a good job of it. They scarified about nine inches deep, and moved some soil which had not been dis- turbed for lie should say 20 years, and at tlie present moment his wheat was looking very nice in consequence. He was 80 well satisfied that he should not hesitate to repeat the experiment. One difliculty in the way of steam ploughing becoming general was that the landlords had not cut tUeir timber down sufficiently, and the fields were hardly large enough. The cost of scarifying was 10s. per acre. Mr. Stonham remarked that under ordinary circumstances steam cultivation was at present discounted by the expense of moving the tackle from place to place. Mr. Clrel said that they had two sets of tackle at work in the place from which he came. They were purchased at the cattle show held a year ago last Christmas. Until the men got used to them there were a few breakages. They were at work all the year round in the hundred of Hoo. He had purchased a tackle for ploughing, but he could not say anything about the cost per acre until they got the machine to work. He had been at work two years with the thrashing machinery, and if he could make steam answer for ploughing, he should be happy to perform work in the neighbourhood of Maidstone. Mr. Wateema_\ said that with regard to steam ploughing there were so many difiiculties in this part of the country that it would never become generally adopted around Maidstone, their attention being for the most part directed to the growth of hops. Where it could be used, no doubt it would be more frequently carried on than it had been. Mr. Wilmot had stated the cost to be 93. per acre. He (Mr. Waterman) liad an orchard ploughed up, and he paid 26s. per acre for the engine and tackle, but with extra expenses he calculated that the total cost was near £2. An ordinary piece of ploughing he had done at 203. per acre, and he did not think they could get a larger piece of land ploughed for less than that. Oa some land in the neighbourhood of faversham steam cultiva- tion could be used with advantage, and in ilomney Marsh , if they could get the land broken up in time, they could move it in winter to advantage ; but anywhere in this district in the Weald of Kent, where the fields were small, and taking into consideration the difficulty of moving the machinery about, he did not think they could beat horses for ploughing. The work which he had done last year, kowever, was exceedingly well done. In his orchard roots large enough to stop the engine were pulled up, but the tackle was not broken. Mr. Paine said that five or six years ago some one called upon him, and he gave him a job. He had a piece of 15 acres, and he wanted it to be ploughed 3 feet deep. The man said he thought he could do it at 18 inches, but he would guarantee that it should be 15 inches deep. The man did the work, but he could not get deeper than 15 inches, and with the coals it cost SGs. per acre. The work was done in a very satisfactory manner, but the results had been poor, and he did no4 grow better crops. The land was drained 5 feet deep, but he did not find that the water got away quicker. He only ploughed about 40 acres in the Weald of Kent, but he could not see any difference in the crops where the steam ploughing left olf and where it began. With regard to the appUcation of manure, he thought that the top of the land was the proper place for manure to be put. He was a deep cultivator, and he was not speaking in opposition to steam ploughing. He had seen work which liad been performed in a very satisfactory manner, and he should be glad to see a steam plough in this neighbourhood. Mr. Bridgland said the object of steam cultivation was to do away with a team of horses. Let them consider the case of a farmer holding 300 acres of arable land ; if he had not the proper seed to lay down, would he not grow as much or more upon the 200 acres as he did upon the larger area, leaving the other 100 acres for grazing purposes. After referring to the manner in which a portion of the land belonging to Messrs. Russell, of Horton Kirby, was laid out for grazing, he sug- gested that the members of the Club should look around and see whether they could not adopt some of these plats. With regard to what had been said about the timber not having been cut down on some of the land in the Weald of Kent, the question might be asked, Was it meant for cultivation ? If a man hired a farm with oak trees npon it he ought not to grumble. There was no other county where hops were culti- vated to so large an extent as in Kent. He should like to ask whether Kent was rented higher than other counties ? Mr. Coley approved of a great many of the remarks which had been made, and there was no doubt that they wanted a better method of cultivating the land. At the present time we had to send abroad for productions which our own could and would produce. It was generally said that most questions had two sides, but when bad farming was alluded to the blame was all put upon the landlords. Perhaps they might give better security, but a good farmer would farm well if he were a tenant-at-will. With regard to steam ploughing he was an advocate of it. Half of the land was not producing nearly so much as it ought to do, and if they could make it produce 20 per cent, more would they not save sums which were sent to foreigners ? What farm could they go over and see land which could not be made more profitable ? If they could see acres, they would find perches and roods which might be made more valuable. Mr. Coley, concluding, expressed his concurrence with the idea expressed by Mr. Bridgland that a farmer using 400 acres, if he were to set aside 300, and to expend the amount on the 300 which he spent on the 400, the farmer would have as much to go to market with from 300 acres as he raised from 400 acres, leaving him 100 acres for other purposes. Mr. Barlino said he should confine his remarks chiefly to the principle of ploughing. Ploughing was a mechanical action, which was to bring about another action — a chemical action. A remark had been made that evening to which he attached much weight. It was possible to cultivate well without ploughing — that was, that by moving the soil suffi- ciently they could bring about fertility without ploughing. It was thus brought about. The organic matter within the soil THE FARMEE'S MAGAZINE. 207 was capable of being dissolved and brought into a soluble condition if it be sufficiently exposed to the oxygen in the air, but if they kept that organic matter sealed up by earth — it might be kept as many generations as they liked — they would get nothing from it. The more they broke the soil and let in the oxygen of the air, the quicker would the organic matter which they, or perhaps their grandfathers, had placed in the soil, become soluble, and the food of seeds which had been placed in that soil. The question of steam-ploughing as against horse-ploughing seemed to come to this — it did not matter how they ploughed, whether by animal force or the force of machinery. They might plough by turning over the soil or by breaking it up, but whatever they did their object was to let in the air. In advocating deep cultivation, Mr. Barling said that if they broke the soil low down — he did not say turn it over — they altered the condition of that soil ; they rendered it warmer, upon the whole. If they laid a ther- mometer on the land, it would be found that the better and the deeper the soil was broken up the warmer would be the land, and temperature was one of the elements favourable to the life of plants. Mr. Paine had remarkd that they could not get rid of water by deep cultivation, but it would be better distributed, and land that had been thoroughly and deeply worked would, generally speaking, be moist, but not sur- charged with water. Moisture was one of the elements upon which vegetable life so greatly depends ; an excess was, how- ever, harmful, but a certain quantity was needful. The land being warmer and moister, must, upon principle, be greatly improved by deep cultivation. The Chairman said he thought that no farmer ought to be without a six-horse engine, and a useful tackle. The time was fast coming when labour would be a serious item, in fact, it was at the present time, and if they would economise labour, they ought to do so, and machinery would enable them to pay more for labour. He agreed with Mr. Barling that the soil might be benefited a great deal from tiie action of the atmos- phere as well as by what they put into it. Mr. Weekes was applying his mind to the construction of an engine better suited to their wants tlian those which were used at present. He thought every farmer should have one, because they could not always hire one when they wanted it, and there was only one time when the land could be ploughed properly, viz., when it was dry. With regard to scarifying the land instead of ploughing it, he found that the more he scarified the soil the more weeds he got. Mr. WiLMOT, in replying to some of the remarks which had been made, said he was much obliged to Mr. Stonham for having fallen in with his ideas of not cultivating land deeper than they could manure it. Mr. Hayes said he wished that he (Mr. Wilmot) had put forward some ideas of his own, but as he was not the owner of a steam-plough he could not throw out any idea respecting it. When preparing his paper he went to a gentleman who he knew used an engine, and he asked him what he found to be the result of three or four years' experience. This gentleman said that the engine had been the greatest benefit he had had since he had been en- gaged in farming. He told him the amount of wages he paid, the cost of fuel, the carriage of water, and that was how he (Mr. Wilmot) calculated that the cost was 9s. per acre. He believed more in the digging apparatus than in ploughing. The engine he had referred to was one of Fowler's, and it worked on the anchor system. He found that the men were better pleased by working with a steam-engine than with horses ; they were better paid, and instead of having their horses to look after when they left off work they went home at once. The gentleman to whoni he had alluded used the engine for sawing wood, and for movin? the tackle aloof. He had used to draw his wheat instead of his team. This was a step in the right direction, and he (Mr. Wilmot) thought that an engine like this every farmer should liave who occupied a farm of any extent. He thought something should be done with regard to our railway system. He wished the subject had been ventilated, for he looked upon it as a national calamity that the railways should be so mismanaged. They ought to be in the hands of tlie Government, and he believed that if they were prosperity in the country would be considerably increased. He thought Englishmen should put their shoulder to the wheel to do some- thing to alter the present railway system. Mr. Waterman said that his land cost him from 20s. to -tOs. per acre, when he hired a steam plough, but he also said something about pulling up some roots, so that he not only had his land ploughed but grubbed (laughter). If Mr. Waterman had grubbed his land first he (Mr. Wilmot) questioned whetlier some of the plough- ing would not have come cheaper to him and have been better done. There was another thing which required attention, and that was deep drainage. With regard to deep drainage, he thought the same as he did respecting deep cultivation, that it was impossible so lay down any fixed plan. They must be guided by the nature of the soil. Some of the land he had seen would have been better if it had not been drained so deep. He thought his paper agreed witli what Mr. Barling had said. Unless the land was thoroughly broken up they could not get a good return for their labour. He agreed with Messrs. Bridgland and Coley that if a farmer had 400 acres it would be more profitable to him to let 100 acres lay by for a short space of time, say one year, and used the whole of his capital on the 300 acres. Mr. Coley said that they spent a certain sura of money out of the country to buy produce. Steam cultivation would alter this, because now they keep hundreds of horses more than they ouglit to keep, and the food the horses consumed would feed- as many individuals. Farmers would have to give more consideration to the point he had raised with regard to co-operation in the purchase of machinery. They must remember that they lived on each other, they were all brothers, and if they could do anything to help each other forward in this world and the world to come, it was their duty to do so. A vote of thanks to Mr. Wilmot concluded the proceed- ings. THE USE OF SEWAGE AND THE PROSPECTS OF FARMING. At a general meeting of the Essex Chamber of Agriculture at Braintree, Major Vaizey, President, in the chair, read the following paper on the Disposal and Utilisation of Town Sewage : The subject which I have the honour of bringing before you this morning is one — not by any means the most agreeable for discussion 1 could select — but yet at the present time of such great national importance that I have felt no hesitation in choosing it. But although somewhat uninviting it is a subject of great utility, as it not only directs our attention to the neces- sity of saving from utter waste a large amount of material very useful to the agriculturist, but also aims at preserving our rivers and streams from a pollution that must be a source of disease to our cottage population, no less than to the herds that have the misfortune to graze upon their banks, and drink of their waters. To us agriculturists, therefore, there is a special interest in the consideration and discussion of any facts which may help us to a satisfactory solution of the difficult question of the aisposal and utilisation of sewage. The gradual and yet rapidly increasing aggregation of the popula- tion of this country to large centres has, during the past few years, added numerously to the difficulty of disposing of the sewage, for what in rural villages is a simple and easy task to perform, in such cities as London, Manchester, or Leeds, becomes almost an impossibility. Met as we are, as a Chamber of Agriculture, and not as a Sanitary Board, it will , I think, be unnecessary for me to occupy your time by enlarging on the several plans adopted in the first instance for the collec- tion, and afterwards for the conveyance, of the sewage of a town to land, for the purpose of its utilisation as manure. I may, however, mention some of the more usual plans employed. There is, first, the open midden system, which is, I suppose, the oldest of all, the cause frequently of epidemic diseases, and the one most liable to abuse. Then there is the cesspool, or dead well, so common still in country towns and rural districts, and one which, when carried out properly, the cesspool well constructed, well trapped, and suitably placed for periodical emptying, seems to rae a simple and satisfactory plan. Next we have the earth closet, patented by Mr. Moule, where we see the plan of nature's own invention, adapted on the most ap- 208 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE proved principle, but failing, I may state in passing, on account of the impossibily of obtaining an adequate supply of dry eartli — i.e., on a large scale, witness the fact that for the popu- lation of 13irmingham upwards of 690 tons a day would be required. To these I may add what is termed the llochdale system, wherein, by the application of a chemical disinfecting fluid to each closet seat, the excreta are collected and removed to the manure manufactory without any nuisance being caused to the surrounding neighbourhood. To this class also belong the Gous system, in partial and satisfactory use at the town of Halstead, in this county, as well as at other places, in which an absorbant substance is introduced in lieu of the chemical disinfecting fluid. Finally, we have the water, or water-closet system, now in such general use, and to meet the requirements ot which is really one of the great problems of the day as regards the reception and utilisation of the sewage therefrom. I will, therefore, now direct your attention to the consideration of this branch of the subject, and would state that there are three principal methods which have been and are employed for this purpose : I. Precipitation. II. Filtration. III. Irrigation. I. Precipitation. — This consists in adding to the sewage various cliemical re-agents, with the object of precipitating or throwing down a portion of the dissolved constituents, and of assisting the precipitation of the suspended constituents, and ultimately of realising the value of the precipitate as manure. Processes to carry out this plan are numerous, amongst thera I may mention — (1.) The lime process. (2.) The lime and chloride of iron. (3.) The sulphate of alumina. (4.) Lenk's process, consisting chiefly of alum, ' (5.) Forbes' process ; and (6.) The A. B. C. process, consisting of alum, blood, clay, and charcoal. We will now for a few moments consider briefly the more important of these systems, and (1), the lime process. This consists in adding to the sewage a certain proportion of the milk of lime, about one ton to one million gallons, agitating the sewage to ensure a thorough mixture, and then allowing it to flow into a settling tank, where the suspended solid matter is quickly precipitated ; the water is then drawn slowly off, considerably clarified, the deposit is taken out, and after being dried is sold for manure ; but this is a tedious and offen- sive process. This plan is the simplest and least costly of all, but according to the opinion of the Rivers Pollution Com- mission the eflduent water, though clarified, is not sufficiently purified to be fitly admitted into a running stream, as it still contains one-half of the putrescible organic matter, which it is, of course, most important to keep out ; for the same reason the deposit when used as manure is of small value. From a sanitary point of view, this process, if very carefully carried out, is to some extent successful, but not commercially so. It has been, I may add, employed at Tottenham, Leicester, and Blackburn. (2.) The lime and chloride of iron process. — As to this system, I need only remark that it is much the same as the one I have just described, with the addition of chloride of iron, the result being a rather more thorough defacation of the sewage. Still, I believe, as a practical result, the efliuent water is not sufficiently pure to be allowed to enter a running stream. (3.) Bird's process — sulphate of alumina. — The result similar to the last. (4-.) Lenk's process. — This comprises the use of alum as a precipitant. Dr. Voelcker reports favourably of its effects, stating that the effiuent water might with safety be turned into a river ; but it is too expensive for general use. It was for a while, I understand, tried at Tottenham by the patentee himself, bat not continued on account of the expense, and also the uncertainty of the value of the manure produced. (5.) Forbes' process. — Tliis consists in treating the sewage with a solution of phosphate of alumina dissolved in sulphuric acid, and the great difference between it and other precipitat- ing processes is that the agent employed itself contains most valuable fertilising properties. It is also a powerful disinfect- ant, so that the drying the deposit for manure is less offensive than in the other plans. For subsequent irrigating purposes also, the effluent water, while clear and inodorous, is besides highly valuable, being enriched by the addition of soluble phosphates, and its mauurial value is thus greatly increased. Indeed, according to Dr. Voelcker's report, the effluent water is more valuable, bulk for bulk, than the raw sewage for irri- gation purposes. When, however, it is not intended to irri- gate, a quantity of milk of lime is added in the subsiding tank, thus precipitating the phosphates in solution by after- wards filtering the effluent water through a filter of some car- bonised substance : any organic matter may be pretty surely eliminated, and it may be safely turned into a watercourse. (6.) Phosphate sewage process. — Lastly, under this division of our subject, we come to the A. B.C. (so named from the initial letters of the precipitates used), or SiUar's process of treating sewage by precipitation — viz., by the admixture with it of alum, blood, clay, and charcoal. I believe the report of the Rivers Pollution Commission was somewhat unfavourable as to its results, the effluent water not being satisfactorily purified, the manure obtained having a very low market value, and the manipulations required in its preparation being at- tended with a nauseous odour. We are bound, nevertheless, to admit that this process commands a large share of popular favour, and with the improvements in its manufacture which the Company are continually making, we may fairly hope it will prove itself successful. In conclusion, under this head, I would remark that while some of the systems I have thus briefly attempted to describe may under favourable circumstances be adopted with advan- tage, all seem more or less to fail in extracting satisfactorily the fertilising matters held in solution. The most valuable constituent of sewage, par excellence, is the ammonia which still escapes in the efliuent water, and so far as the precipi- tating process is concerned is lost to the manure ; the sub- stances precipitated being those which are held in suspense, and which would have just as well have been retained by a mere mechanical process of filtration. This brings as to the consideration of the next branch of our subject, viz., (II.) The Filtration of Sewage. — The object in view in filtration processes is to arrest the suspended matter, and to subject it to a rapid process of oxidation — in other words, to convert the carbon of organic matter into carbonic acid, and the nitrogen into nitric acid and ammonia, all of which are soluble and inoffensive in water ; at all events so far as to allow such water to be turned into a running stream. In a well-constructed filter, the pores are filled with atmospheric oxygen, and when the sewage matter is first introduced into it the conversion or oxidation of the organic matter goes on rapidly, but thereby tbe oxygen soon soon becomes exhausted, and the filter must then be properly drained to allow the oxygen in the air again to have free access to its pores. Charcoal is usually considered to be the best filtering medium for sewage, because it possesses the peculiar property of absorbing many times its volume of oxygen and other gases. The best system of this principle, is that called Weare's filtration process. It is, or was three years ago, when I saw it in action, practised at the workhouse at Stoke-upon-Trent. I was informed by the master of the workhouse that it was a success, and I be- lieve since that period the company have introduced several improvements into the process, doubtless with the view of rendering it more efficient. The sewage coming from the house, inhabited • by 800 persons, passes through a succession of deodorising tanks of coke and charcoal, each tank being fiUed with finer charcoal than the last, until the liquid finally comes out nearly clear and almost tasteless, superior, so far as I could judge, to a sample I saw at the Sewage Farm, at Romford. There was no offensive smell near the .filtering tanks, which were cleansed at various intervals — the first set about once a fortnight. The charcoal used came from the steel manufactories, but I was informed that the company was engaged in making peat charcoal at their works at Horwich, in Lancashire. The manure was free from any offensive odour — indeed, it smelt like newly-turned up mould ; it was taken to the company's yard, mixed with soot, bone dust, and ammonia, and sold at £4 per ton. The charcoal is supplied by the company, and the quantity used is about one ton a week. About the same quantity of cinders from the workhouse, sifted and washed for the purpose, is also used. Thus fifty-two tons of charcoal and the same quan- tity of cinders are required for the purification of the sewage of 800 persons, with an ordinary daily flow of 10,000 gallons. The estimated yield of manure, with the addition of ashes, &c., is about 250 tons a year. The system is now, I believe, in use THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 209 at Bradford (140,000), and other places are, it is said, likely to adopt it. One ton of charcoal when added to the sewage and with the other ingredients I have mentioned, would make three tons of the manure, which sells at 80s. a ton. In my opinion, on a moderately large scale, and under favourable local circumstances, this system is likely to succed, the objec- tion to it on a large scale, like the precipitating processes, is the expense and the quantity of the ingredients re(iuired. Still, after all, I must confess I lean a good deal to Weare's patent. To deliver charcoal in this district from the north would, I believe, cost something like 60s. a ton altogether — a heavy charge to start with. HI. We now come to the ocly other method yet known of purifying sewags — viz., by irrigation, i.e., by passing it through the natural soil. Land is a natural filter, and if the purification of sewage alone is contemplated, a compara- tively small area used simply as a filter-bed may suffice, if the filtration is intermittent, to purify sewage, so as to allow of its admission into a runuiug stream ; but if it is also required to utilise the elements of fertility which the sewage may contain, a vastly larger area is necessary if the sewage is to be applied so as to produce the greatest return in the shape of market- able crops, withoutiujuring the permanent fertility of the soil. Now, we will first consider the second of these cases, where utilisation is the primary object. In considering this branch of the subject, the following questions present themselves for solution : 1. Does ordinary sewage possess a manurial value sufficient to induce persons to incur the very considerable expense of laying out land for its reception by irrigation ? 2. Can it be applied continuously without injury to the permanent fertility of the soil ? 3. What area of land is necessary for the perfect utilisation of sewage of given quantity and strength, so that no fertili- sing element in the sewage shall be wasted ? In the present state of knowledge upon these questions, I feel it would be the height of presumption in me to offer any decided opinion to this Chamber. Indeed chemists of ttie highest scientific attainments hold opinions in direct contra- diction to each other, and engineers of the greatest eminence are equally at variance. This being the state of the question, I will content myself with giving you, as well as I can, a very brief resume of the results of the experience of this system as tried at several places ; and I may first mention Mr. Hope's farm at Romford, to which I myself, in company with many members of this Chamber, had the pleasure of paying a visit some three years ago. The farm is (or at that time was), I believe, about 120 acres in extent, and takes the sewage of 7,000 people, i.e., 58 persons to an acre. The farm is laid out on what is called the narrow-bed system, i.e., 15 feet on each side of the carrier, which is lined with concrete ; the sewage is conveyed by gravitation from the town, and discharged into tanks, from which it is pumped up 25 feet, and conveyed thence all over the farm by the iron troughs and carriers I have referred to. The character of the soil of the farm is well adapted for irrigation, being poor and light, with a gravelly subsoil, thus requiring a maximum amount of moisture, while its comparative close proximity to London oft'ers great facilities for the disposal of rye-grass and green vegetables, best adapted to produce good financial results from sewage farming. But with all these advantages, I am told Mr. Hope considers more land still wanted, as the sewage of 35 persons to an acre is what he considers the maximum satisfactory amount. 1 need not say that everything at the Romford farm is done in tiie best manner possible, and I may also add that in dry seasons especially very heavy crops are grown. I will now cite the case of Warwick. The sewage farm in connection with tliis town of 11,000 inhabitants is 135 acres iu extent, i.e., in the proportion of 85 persons to an acre. The crops are chiefly rye, cabbages, mangold, and potatoes, with a small proportion of cereals (oats and wheat), but little or no sewage is applied to the corn crops while growing. In the winter the fallows are heavily irrigated, and some old pasture lands are also treated with the sewage, but in a raw state it cannot be applied to grass after the plant has attained a certain growth — in that case it must first have its solid matters suspended. As in other places, so at Warwick, the arrangement at the sewage farm are somewhat interfered with by the quantity of storm water introduced into the sewers. Eor complete utilization or purification of sewage, a separate system of drains for surface and storm water is really indispen3able. Altogether, the War- wick farm appears to be well and eflicieutly conducted. No perceptible smell is said to exist, and the effluent water is fairly purified. I may just state that the 'account for the year 1871 stood somewhat as follows : Crops sold ,, stored, value 765 „ growing, value 640 £2,071 While the total annual outlay, including interest on capital, coals, and all expenses of pumping, rent, and the ordin- ary expenses of working a farm, amount to £1,900, thus leaving a balance on the right side of £171. As regards the application of sewage to the meadow lands at Edinburgh, there is no doubt that larger amounts of sew- age are applied there, and a larger amount of produce ob- tained per acre than elsewhere, but this is at a great waste of manurial constituents and very imperfect purification of the sewage. The general result appears to be that sewage can only be profitably applied for the growth of heavy crops of rye and other grasses, and roots ; and that probably the ap- plication of about 5,000 tons of sewage per acre per annum to meadow or Italian ryegrass would in the majority of cases prove to be the most profitable mode of utilisation ; the price per ton not to exceed one-half or certainly three-quarters all the year round, for sewage of the average strength of that of the Metropolis (excluding storm water). But I will not occupy your time by any longer dilating upon the several instances I might mention of other towns which have put this system of sewage irrigation into practice. I have said enough, I think, to show that in many cases, with careful arrangement and planting on land naturally adapted for the application of sewage, as at Aldershot, the system is a successful one ; although at the same time we must confess that tlie financial results are not always what we could desire. The high price generally required for land near a large town suitable for the purpose, the great outlay necessary in the first instance for laying out the farm, and the difficulty of obtaining a sufficiently large sale for the green crops which, as we have seen, must form the larger proportion of the produce of such farm — all these points unite in making the utilisation of sew- age by this method a soraewliat costly one. By a system, however, of what is termed " intermittent downward filtra- tion," as recommended, I believe, by Mr. Hope to the town of Birmingham, a large quantity of sewage can be deodorized on a smaller proportion of land than would otherwise be neces- sary, and by planting root or green crops on ridges — provided a sufficient market for them can be obtained — a fair return can be looked for. The more solid portions of the sewage de- posited in the hollows must be from time to time removed or mixed with the soil by the use of the scarifier ; but at all times under such a system as this the sanitary question must be placed above the agricultural, and to prevent a nuisance it might at times be indispensable to plough up the land while under crops — a dreadful alternative of course to the farmer, naturally desirous of seeing a fair return for his outlay. In conclusion, I would remark with all diflideuce that it ap- pears to me, as the result of my inquiries into this question, the course to be pursued must in each case depend on the local and special circumstances of that case. In the outlying dis- tricts of a town I should recommend well-constructed cesspools, or some mechanical disinfectant process may be satisfactorily employed — as the Goux system, or the plan I mentioned before as in use at Rochdale. In places where land cannot be ob- tained in sufficient quantities or at a fairly remunerative price, or where a sewage farm would, from the number of surrounding more or less isolated dwellings, be likely to be a nuisance, I should suggest, the introduction of Weare's charcoal system, or the phospiiate sewage process (referred to above under the name of I'orbes' patent), and 1 am told now employed lyith great success in connection with the Lodge farm, at Barking, in this county. I think as a rule, too, the use of some precipi- tate (as the milk ot lime) is very much recommended ; this diminishes the amount of solid matter, which otherwise would be poured on tiie irrigated land, and at the same time creates in the settling tank a deposit, which, when mixed with cinders, earth, or ashes, can be easily removed and sold as solid nanure. That good water and pure running streams are essential to the well-being both of man and beast, is a point which, though 210 THE FARMEE'S MAGAZINE/ generally admitted, is not always sufficiently regarded. In a letter lately received from Professor Wyvill Thompson, of her Majesty's ship Challenger, describing the Islands of the Ber- mudas group (which they visited in the course of their voyage of scientific investigation), I find an illustration and confirma- tion of this fact. After enlarging upon the sylvan beauty of the scenery, with its luxurious tropical vegetation, he remarks that the climate is peculiarly genial, but not so healthy as it would be if the plans of sewage could be rendered more effec- tive, and if there were a greater supply of good water and running streams ; and he afterwards proceeds to say : " There is but little live stock upon the islands ; cattle and sheep do not thrive well, probably mainly owing to the want of a plen- tiful supply' of good water, so that instead of being able to supply ships calling there with fresh meat, even the butchers' meat for the consumption of the inhabitants is almost all im- ported from America." I think I h&ve said enough to recom- mend to your approval the resolution I have appended to this paper. As regards the importance of the question, looking at it either from a sanitary or an agricultural point of view, there can be no doubt ; nor, as I have shown, is the solution of the question at all easy how best to utilise and preserve from waste this enormous amount of tranurial products so full of ingredients which are greatly needed by the soil. Surely, gentlemen, it would be worthy the attention of any Govern- ment, and be quite befitting their position, to make such an inquiry of the most eminent scientific men — chemists, civil engineers, and agriculturists, as shall enable them not only to order local authorities to abate the nuisance frequently created by the sewage in their respective districts, but also to direct them how best both to dispose of it and also to utilise it. The subject is still, however, in its infancy, and great will be the honour accruing to the agricultural chemist who can un- ravel the difficulty, and who is able to discover a method by which the riches of our native soil, each day drawn from her bosom by the processes of agriculture to satisfy the wants of her children, may in a ten-fold measure be restored to her perennially green and fruitful. Gentlemen, I thank you for your kind attention, and I trust the few remarks I have ven- tured to make, and the hiiei res luiie of this important subject ■which I have endeavoured to present to you, may now form the basis for an interesting discussion. I beg to move : " That in the opinion of this Chamber the question of the disposal of the sewage of towns is of such national importance, and at the same time of such great difficulty, as to justify the Government in taking measures to enable it to furnish local authorities with an approved plan or plans for the utilisation of the sewage of their respective districts." Mr. J. S. Gardiner seconding the resolution. It appeared to him that a great mistake was made in allowing so large an amount of water in the sewers, by which means the expense of removing the night soil was much increased. Our streams and rivers were now rendered perfect channels for dissemi- nating ill health and infectious diseases, putting on one side the fact that by allowing sewage to run into streams a great mass of useful manure was wasted ; and he thought that when the rising generation came to find that they had been paying £14 a ton for guano from South America while they had allowed their sewage to run to waste or worse, to pollute their rivers, they would set them down as a lot of stupid pigs. He men- tioned that he had adopted a plan of his own for utilising night soil, namely, by mixing it with a little water, and using a little coprolite and some sulphuric acid, which mixture made a very valuable manure. He did not, of course, say that it was 80 good as the i^li guano, but he did believe that one ton of that was as good as half a ton of guano. He believed if they collected the night soil, brought it by some process into a dry state, and then put it on their land, they would find it a very valuable manure indeed. Their president had mentioned sewage farms. Now, there was one objection he had, and that was to so large a quantity of sewage being placed upon so small a space of land, for he knew enough of stock feeding to find out that butter made from cows fed on sewage-grown vegetable productions, was in nineteen cases out of twenty bad in itself, and he should as soon think of making bnttei from animals so fed as he should from cart grease. Mr. J. Pertwee said Mr. Vaizey bad said that it was im- possible to introduce the dry-earth system into towns. Cer- tainly it was a gigantic scheme, but looking to ike value the deposit would be he did not think they ought to say it was impossible. He believed no scheme was entitled to greater respect than Moule's dry-earth system, and those only knew its value who had adopted it. He "quoted the military establish- ments in India, where the system was in operation, and said M'ith regard to its utilisation that the hearth droppings and dust bins of each house would be sufficient for its adoption. The subject was one well worthy of consideration, and he hoped more attention would be paid to it in future. Mr. W. Brown said the great question undoubtedly was, how to economise town sewage. He quite agreed with Mr. Gardiner that one of the principal difficulties in the way was the accumulation of storm-water in the sewers, and the ma- who would solve the difficulty would be a public benefactor. Mr. Brown took exception to Mr. Gardiner's remarks upon cattle fed on sewage grass, and said that in the town of Braiatree he believed it was notorious that butter made from cows fed on sewage vegetable productions was some of the finest. He believed with regard to the purifica- tion of our streams that the only means of keeping sewage from the rivers was by pumping it. Mr. J. Smith, sen., said their President had read one of the most elaborate and best papers he had heard since he had been a member of the Chamber, and he had well dealt with a question which was of deep interest to the nation at large. He incidentally mentioned reading an article in a monthly periodical the other day, which suggested a scheme for the utilization of town sewage which had not been touched upon by any speaker, namely, by what is called the " hot-air sys- tem," and probably if it was worked in England as well as it seeras to be in many cases on the Continent it appeared to be more feasible than any scheme he had yet heard of. Mr. Vaizey's proposition did not commit them to anything, and he should therefore support it ; and he should further propose that as this was such an excellent and elaborate paper a num- ber of them should be printed and distributed amongst those members of the Chamber interested in this subject. Mr. E. Gardiner also supported the proposition. Ho spoke strongly against water-closets, more particularly in farm-houses, and said they were most mischievous when con- sidered in connection with sewage irrigation. The President, in reply, mentioned several places, some in Essex, where the authorities were in great trouble about their sewage, and explained that he probably might not have gone so deeply into the subject but for the fact that when he was Chairman of the Halstead Local Board the subject was brought somewhat painfully under their notice. He thanked the Chamber heartily for the kind way in which they had re- ceived his paper, and said he was amply rewarded if he had been the means of doing any good. The motion was then put to the Chamber, and carried unanimously ; as was also a resolution to have 250 copies of the paper printed and circulated amongst the members. Mr. Henry Smith, of Great Bardfield, then read the fol- lowing paper upon the Present Prospects of Farming : la bringing this subject before your notice it is my wish to do it briefly, and also as clearly as I can, that if, as has been said (although I do not think it applies to our Chamber), " the Chambers of Agriculture have become political engines for the landords to air their eloquence at," they may be induced to look at the position of the tenant-farmer, and help to make his prospects brighter than they are at present. Bnt let him at the same time try to help himself ; and I believe that if he looks round he will find these Chambers of Agriculture of more benefit to him than lie is aware of in accomplishing that object. An extract from a notice of the London Farmers Club says : " Each succeeding year furnishes fresh proofs of the necessity of union among farmers, as it behoves them to adopt tlie means pursued by other classes of society, viz., that of associating with each other as well for the purpose of mutual in- formation as for the general good of the body." Now, taking the farmers' prospects as regards his means of getting a living, to say nothing of interest for his capital, and some to lay by for a rainy day, every farmer will confess that they are anything but cheerful. First, the unfavourable seasons of the last two years, the great increase in price of all kinds of stock and machinery, the rise in rents, and lastly, the great agitation in the labour market. It will very likely be said that they had bad seasons years ago. No one will deny it, and this is one of the things that no farmer, however clever, can contend against. The increase in the price of all kinds of live stock will of necessity finds its own level, but it must be well-known to the mind of every practical farmer that there is not and THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 211 cannot be the same money got out of stock, sheep, and cattle more particularly, wiien they are liigh as when they are at a low price, leaving out of consideration altogether the much greater loss in the event of disease and death, wliich cannot be avoided. The price of machinery has also gone up very much during the last two or three years ; but even with this increase I believe it is cheap compared with what it was years ago, owing to the simplicity of many of our most useful implements, and the great perfection that many of them are arriving at. I must now touch for a minute or two on that very delicate question, the labour of the farm, this being, as I think most will allow, tlie greatest obstacle the farmer of the present day has to contend with. That great authority on farming matters, Mr. Clare Sewell Read, says that he has saved £100 per year since the advance in wages, but he goes on to say, " The days of neat and tidy farming are over." To a certain extent this must be so. When men were kept on during the winter months more out of charity than anything else, farmers could do the odd jobs that never really paid for doing. But now the case is altered. There is not the surplus labour there was years ago, in fact, it is no use hiding it, there is in some parts really a scarcity. Then comes the question, what is scarcity ? An old farmer who had farmed 40 or 50 years ago, if he had not a lot of men standing about doing nothing all winter would say he had a scarcity, but I think he could manage to do without them. The otiier day, I was talking to an old man who had been on the farm 50 years, and he said, " I recollect when there was four of us cobbing clover seed in this barn and four more drawing it in, and that for two months ; now you can get it all done in a fortnight." That is just the point I want to come to. With the increased improvements in mactiinery and steam power at the back, the work can be done in less than half the time, with fewer men, and if not any cheaper at any rate not much dearer. Then as to the uniform rate of wages. That must be acknowledged to be a bad system. If the work is put out by the piece it makes better men and better masters than if all is done by the day ; of course there are jobs which must be done by the day. But as the old labourer once said, " He'd got a two-shilling stroke and he'd got an eighteenpenny stroke." for example,! had two men land- draining in one field — the one with a boy, the other without ; ihey were both engaged exactly the same time ; the one with- out a boy earned £4- 16s. 8d., the one with £3 17s. 3d. I have avoided touching on the great conflict now raging between masters and men on our borders, because I think as there is so much difference of feeling on the subject, and as the meeting of this Chamber appointed to be held to consider the subject was abandoned, it is not worth while to introduce this meeting to a question upon which its members differ so widely. Every class of society seems to me to be having a kick at the farmer now he is down. The Church, which gets rich from his tithes, has a kick through one of her bishops ; the land- lords liave kicked him for some time, and now give him one extra ; his faithful London paper kicks him, and hints that he ought not to drink claret in his dining-room, but small beer in the kitchen. If he wants his children educated, he should send them to the parish school instead of having a governess, and be content with his weekly trip to market, and leave Con- tinental cities for his landlord and the city merchants. If the very powerful influence of the London press is so brought to bear against the farmers, surely we ought to take steps to prove the gross injustice of these statements, and to ask the world whether farmers have made more progress or gone more ahead of Iheir position than any other class of society. Look at the city merchant, whose father used to live over the shop, and now see his house at Croydon or Norwood ; who used to take his family to Greenwich once a year, and now gets as far as Scotland by 12th August. A late chancellor has a kick, and thinks his cart-horses want taxing. Would that we had more clear-sighted sound common-sense ladies like Lady Stradbroke to announce to the country the altogether false position in which tenant-farmers are represented, and to challenge the world to show one man who has made a colossal fortune by farming. As Mr. C. S. Read says, " Where one man has re- tired on farming are there not twenty who ought to be candi- dates for admission into the Royal Agricultural Benevolent Institution ?" Most of you have probably seen Mr. Mechi's paper, read at the Farmers' Club in February last, on " The Commercial Principle as applied to Farming." These princi- ples are very good, and no doubt would benefit the farmer, but it is impossible to carry them out under the present existing laws relating to land. Every farmer ought to be allowed to conduct his business in the way by which he can get the best return for his money. This I take it stands A 1 among com- mercial principles ; but how can this be done with an unsecured tenancy, no compensation for improvements, restriction as to cropping and selling, and the refusal of the right to kill game, &c., &c. ? There was published a month or two since the draft of a lease to be signed by tiie tenants of Lord Bateman. I wonder whether his lordship has found anybody in his senses to sign it. It tells how much dung is to be put on per acre — so much if long, so much if short ; what weeds are to be taken off the land ; how much and how often to fallow ; how many acres to sow with clover ; what not to sell, leaving nothing but corn available ; how to clean the ditches out and stop the gaps — in short, just such a lease as his lordship's tailor might require. What commercial man would have any- tiiing to do with a business under these conditions ? Mr. Mechi says the want of book-keeping is the weak point of British agriculture. This I think quite true, in spite of the old saying that tiiere was not profit enough to pay for the paper. The progress of agriculture must always keep pace with each succeeding generation. One of our greatest agri- culturists, the late John Grey, of Dilston, said, " Let no one speak of perfection in agriculture, rather let him be perfectly assured that perfection will not be attained in his time." There is one thin?; I think ought to be combined with a far- mer's education. Every young man intending to follow farm- ing ought to serve his time at the Veterinary College, and so get an insight into the anatomy as well as the diseases of live stock, with which he has so much to do. This would be a great help to a farmer, and save a deal of expense. Another thing, I would encourage every farmer to take an agricultural paper every week, and study it. Mr. James Howard once said lie believed it was a very dear paper from which enough could not be learned to pay the expense. It is often said, " Farming must be a good trade ; look at the applications for a farm as soon as there is one to let ; often 30 or 40 for a 300-acre farm." Well, in the first place, are all the applica- tions made by persons who require a farm as a means of get- ting a living? Certainly not. As soon as a merchant or otiier man of business gets a fortune together, he looks out for a farm as a pleasant means of getting rid of it. He does not look out for a grocer's or a draper's shop, but considers that a farm can easily be managed, and looks upon it to a certain degree as a gentlemanly calling. Another reason is that while the population keeps steadily increasing the acre- age does not. Farming is a pleasant and to some extent in- dependent life, hence the ?reat demand for land. The ques- tion was asked in The Mark Lane Express a month or two since : " Can you inform me how many candidates in their addresses make any reference to agriculture?" I would ven- ture to ask the same question with regard to our own ten members. I cannot find one in this purely agricultural county who alludes either to the farmer or his interests. As long as the farmer is content by sitting still and only grumb- ling, no one will think he is so badly off as is really the case. If they, like other parties in the country, would insist on being represented in Parliament by their own men, or some who had their affairs equally at heart, instead of, as The Mark Lane Express says, gross offenders in the over-preservation of game and raw lads fresh from school, better times would be in store for them, and they would gain that independence which they have never yet known. What other business or profes- sion in which so many hundreds of thousands are engaged can be found that is represented in the House of Commons by one member out of 650? If every county were to return one member only whom the farmers could depend on the measures affecting his interest would not be pushed aside to make room for some of far less importance to himself and the country at large. But now, as an " East Essex Farmer" in The Mark Lane Express truly says, " The farmers are mere political nonentities in the House of Commons, their rights trampled on, and their interests neglected." In conclusion, I will just give a resolution proposed by the Newbury Chamber : " That this Chamber requests its members to give their earnest sup- port to any measures embracing the following subjects— Tenant-Right as embraced in Howard and Read's Bill, Local Taxation, alteration of the Game-Laws, Repeal of the Malt- tax, and the appointment of a Minister of Agriculture," and beg to move one similar to it : " That this Chamber resolves 212 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. to promote such measures, especially Parliamentary, which in its opinion will tend to benefit the tenant-farmer." Mr. Henry Pertwee seconded the resolution, and characterised Mr. Smith's paper as a most excellent one. Mr. J. S. Gardiner said he so entirely agreed with Mr. Smith's paper, that it really left him nothing to say. There was, however, one subject upon which he should like to say a word, namely, upon the labour question, which was a subject concerning them all, and one which, however much they might desire to see it put on one side, would liave to be met, and he hoped would be met like men by the farmers. Mr. Gardiner then weut on to comment in somewhat strong language upon tlie position assumed by the N.A.L.U., and the labourers under the guidance of that institution, and quoted numerous extracts of an exciting and violent character from the Labouren' U/iion Chronicle, which, he said, instead of healing the differences now existing between the farmer and his men, liad tended only to widen the breach, and to make farther aad further recede in the distance the prospect of an amicable settlement. JJe anathematised Messrs. Morley and Dixon, who, he said, had no more right to dictate to the farmers the terms upon which they were to employ their men than they had to go to the factories owned by those gentlemen and dictate to them what wages they should pay their opera- tives. Tiie delegates, some of whom liad ventured to abuse him close to his own house, also came in for some sharp strictures, Mr. Ball being particularly characterised as one who made it liis business to go from village to village, stirring up btrife between employers and employed. In conclusion, Mr. Girdintr said the farmers had a most kindly feeliag towards the men, but they could not pay them more than supply and demand justified, although some of them often did; but he thought they were called upon as employers of labour to discountenance altogether the National Agricultural Labourers' Union. Mr. YoUNGJi.vN expressed an opinion that commercial principles between employer and employed must ultimately be established. With regard to the present unhappy dispute, he hoped it was not tlie general opiniou that the violent express- ions used by a few gave a fair estimate of the agricultural labourer of the prese.^t day. The violent language, too, had not been all on oae side, for such, he had noldoubt, had been used by the advocates of the farmers, and even the Lady Stradbroke, who had been so highly spoken of, had gone almost as far as some of the labourers' delegates in a recent letter to the John Bull. They must admit that a good deal of temper had been shown, and hard things said on both sides ; but he hoped that in the course of a few weeks all difficulties would be smoothed away, and that the time was not far off when they would begin to forget all that liad been said ; and as no doubt the labourers wanted the farmers quite as much as the farmers wanted the labourers, a settlement would be arrived at. Mr. Smith, who was warmly applauded, said he was much obliged to the Chamber for the kind way in which they had received his paper, which it had given him great pleasure to read. He, however, wished their meetings were better attended, for he believed that Chambers of Agriculture were of tlie utmost benefit to the tenant-farmers, although that benefit might be indirect. The President quite endorsed Mr. Smith's last remarks. It certainly was no fault of the Executive that the meetings were not better attended. He Was sorry their friends round Brain- tree had not attended so largely as they could wish, but those who had come must have been greatly pleased with the capital way in which Mr. Smith dealt with the subject he had introduced. But there was one remark he should like to make, namely, that he thought farmers should be better represented in tlie House of Commons, and this might be accomplished if they took a long and strong pull together as other classes did. He regretted the absence of one of their own members, wiio was very regular in his attendance, but who, he presumed, was engaged in Parliamentary duties and so unable to come. He then put Mr. Smith's motion to the meeting and it was carried unanimously. Mr. Smith, sen., proposed a vote of thanks to the President for presiding over them that day. Speaking upon the subject of Parliamentary representation, he said he thought that they should send as many farmers' candidates to ParUament as they could, but what was more necessary was that they should help themselves. He also read extracts from a recent speech by Mr. Clare Sewell Head, who, lie said, Norfolk ought to be proud of, and who was one of the few who did put the tenant-farmer in his proper position before the public. Mr. J. S. Gardiner seconded the vote of thanks, and took occasion to express a wish that gentlemen of their President's own class, who, he said, were conspicuous by their absence, would make it convenient to attend their meetings. The motion was carried unanimously ; and, thanks having been accorded to Mr. Smith and Mr. Vaizey for their respec- tive papers, the meeting separated. THE BATH AND WEST OF ENGLAND SOCIETY, AND SOUTHERN COUNTIES ASSOCIATION. The monthly Council meeting was held at the Grant Hotel, Bristol, on July 28, under the presidency of Mr. R. Benyon, M.P. There were also present Messrs. Bremridge, J. Gray, Neville-GrenviUe, M.P., and J. C. Moore Stevens (vice-presidents) ; Messrs. C. T. I). Acland, J. T. Boacawen, H. Badcock, C. Busli, li. H. Bush, T. Danger, J. T. Davy, T. Duckham, T. Dyke, Gilbert, C. Gordou, A. R. Grenfell, J. Hallett, H. M. Holdsworth, J. P. Lennard, H. A. P. Luttrell, H. Middleton, R. Neville, S. P. Newbery, J. Quartly, G. Simpson, H. St. John Maule, R. Trood, and J. Goodwin, secretary and editor. The Bristol Meeting. — Mr. Herbert Williams, as chair- man of the Pinance Committee, brought up a statement of the receipts at the recent annual meeting, and asked the sanction of the Council to the payment of prizes and other claims to the amount of £6,030 I8s. 9d., and the purchase of £2,800 stock, raising the funded capital of the Society to £U\000. These several proposals were adopted and ordered to be carried out. On the motion of Mr. Herbert Williams, chairman of Finance, it was resolved that the salary of Mr. William Smith, the official accountant of the Society, be increased to £100 per annum. The stewards and officers for the ensuing year were nomi- nated for election at the next council meeting. To the Stock Prize-sheet Committee Mr. J. Quartly was added; to the Judges Selection Committee, Mr. T. Duckham ; to the Arts Committee, Mr. G. Simpson, of Wray Park, Reigate. Messrs. H. M. Holdsworth and C. T. D. Acland were nominated stewards of the yard ; Mr. R. Neville and Mr. C. A. W. Troyte, stewards of implements (yard) ; Messrs. Knollys, Jones, and Dyke, stewards of implements (field) ; Messrs. T. Davy, H. Pookes, T. Duckham, and A. Grenfell, stewards of stock ; Colonel Luttrell and Mr. C. Gordon, stewards of horses ; Messrs. II. H. Bush and C. Edwards, stewards of poultry ; the Hon. and Rev. J. T. Boscawen, steward of hor- ticulture ; Mr. Jonathan Gray, steward of music ; Col. Jjuttrell, Mr. Grenfell, and Mr. Maule, committee of the mess ; Mr. H. St. John Maule, steward of refreshments ; Mr. J. Gray, Mr. Knollys, and Mr. Moysey, stewards of plant ; and Co!onel Luttrell, Colonel Lennard, Mr. R. Neville, Mr. C. A. W. Troyte, and Mr. Arthur Grenfell, stewards of arrangements. The official superintendent was directed to secure the services of a competent storekeeper, who shall also have charge of the weigh-bridge henceforth to be provided. Croydon Meeting. — An addition of £100 was made to the amount granted for stock at the Bristol meeting, thus raising it in the aggregate to £1,800. The amount allowed to the stewards of poultry was £315 ; to the steward of horti- cultare £130. Communications from Mr. H. Compton, of Manor House Lyndhurst, Hants ; Mr. B. St. John Ackers, of Prinknash- patk, Gloucestershire; and Mr. Hudspetli, agent to Mr. W. Nicholson, of Basing-park, Alton, were ordered to be referred to the stewards of stock. THE FARMEK'S MAGAZINE. 21i New members : C. B. Worsnop, South Kensiugton Museum ; I Taunton ; C. A. R. Iloare, Fleet-street, London ; A. Wansey, W. Coles, Wellow; E. B. Hooper, Wellow ; T. G. Meeteus, ] Bristol; Wills, London. LEICESTERSHIRE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT LEICESTER. The horse classes were well filled, and the huiters and hacks good. The agricultural classes included some powerful horses, and a number of promising foals. Of cattle there was a very short show. There were but 29 entries, and several of these did not make an appearance. Mr. J. N. Beasley, of Brampton Farm, carried off tne prize for the best fat ox: and Mr. F. Cartwright, of Drakelow, that for the best fat cow. There was only one young Shorthorn bull, Mr. W. F. Wood- roffe's, of Norraanton ; and only two older bulls,' the best of which was that of Mr. R. Wade, Ashley. Mr. J. J. Sharp, of Broughton, took the first prizes in the three next classes, for Shorthorn cow in milk, in-calf Shorthorn heifer, and Shorthorn stirk. The long-horn classes were chiefly remark- able for the absence of a name formerly among the most s'iiccessfal exhibitors, Mr. Chapman. There was no entry for Altlerney or Guernsey cows in the classes, and only a small Aldferney shown as extra stock. The sheep, Leicester and long-wooUed, were on the whole better represented. Mr. G. Turner, jim., of Thorpelands, took the two prizes for Leicester rams ; those for long-woolied shearlings being taken by Mr. R. Johnson (Kirk Ireton), and Mr. R.Wright (Norton Heath) ; with tliose for older raMs were taken by the same exhibitors in reveBe order. There was some competition in Shropshire Rams, the prize for which was taken by Mr. W. H. Clare; in the other classes of Shropshires Mr. S. C. Pilgrim carried oft" the honours. The pigs were a fair show, though eeverJil of the entries did not arrive; and Mr. M.Walker, Mr. R.^Et/Duckrting, and Mr. .T. Wheeler were the successful exhibitors. Messrs'. Vipan and Headley had a large show of agricultural implements ; and Mr. F. Johnson also exhibited an 'assortment of agricultural machinery. The meeting on the whole was a tame one, tlie Leicester fixture being rather " harried " by the Society. PRIZE LIST. UUNTERS. Judges. — Hon. A. Pennington, Captain Whitmore, and Mr. John Holiday. Hunter, gelding, or mare, not less than five years old and under ten, open to all England. — First prize, £20, W. P. Hubbersty, Wirksworth, Derby (Sultan) ; second, £5, J. Smeeton, Husbands, Bosworth Lodge, Rugby. Commended : G. Pilkiugton, Stoneleigh, Wootton, Liverpool. Gelding or filly (four years old), adapted for hunting pur- poses, bred within the limits of the Belvoir, Quorn, Mr. Tailby's Cottesmore, Atherstone, and Pytchley hunts. — First prize, £20, J. E. Bennett, Husbands Bosworth Grange, Rugby (Melrose) ; second, £5, J. E. Bennett (K.C.B.). Hunter, not less than fottr years old, belonging to a tenant- farmer (residing or occupying within the limits of Mr. Tailby's Hunt) or his son living with him, and following the same occupation. — First prize, £10, J. Smeeton ; second, £5, A. Innocent, Kibworth. Commended: A. Innocent. Gelding or filly (three years old), adapted for hunting purposes, bred within tlie limits of the Belvoir, Quorn. — First prize, £10, Rev. E. Bruxner, the Holt, Thurlastou, Hinckley ; second, £5, J. W. Jenkins, Husbands Bosworth, Rugby. Gelding or filly (two years old), adapted for hunting pur- poses, bred within the limits of the Belvoir, Quorn, Mr. Tailby's Cottesmore, Atherstone, and Pytchloy Hunts. — First prize, a silver cup or money, value £10, Rev. G. E. Bruxner ; second, £5, W. E. Oakley, Cliff House, Atherstone. Com- mended : W. E. Oakley. Yearling colt or filly for hunting purposes. — First prize, £10, W. E. Oa^ley ; second, £5, J. E. Bennett. Commended : Rev. G. E. Bruxner. Hack, not less than fourteen hands two inches, and not exceeding 15 hands two inches high. — First prize, £10, J. Tiornsby, Castle Gate House, Grantham (Ballet Girl) ; second, £5, A. Dabbs, Humberstone-gate, Leicester (Star Thistle). Commended : G. W. Sykes, the Pines, Gadd«sby ; W. Loyley, 106, Highcross-street, Leicester ; J. E. Bennett. Cob, not exceeding fourteen hands and a-half. — First prize, a silver cup or money, value £5, J. Wiggins, Market Har- borongh (Prince) ; second, C. Montagu, JNIanor House, New- ton Harcourt. Pony, not exceeding thirteen hands and a-half. — First prize, a silver cup or money, value £5, J. H. Smith, Oaldby ; second, £3, J. T. Jacques, Welford-road, Leicester. Mare, calculated to breed iuinters, that shall have suckled a foal up to the 1st of July, 1874, or is now in foal. — First prize, ^10, T. H. Smith, Curborough, Lichfield; second, £5, J. D. Cradock, Quorn, Longhborough. Judges.— J. II. Wood and G. Smith. Gelding or filly (two years old), best adapted to the general purposes of agriculture. — First prize, a silver cup or money, value £10, H. Burgess, Middleton, Rockingham ; second, £5, H. Bond, Walcote, Lutterworth. Highly commended: T. H. Simpkin, Hoby. Gelding or filly (one-year-old), best adapted to the general purposes uf agriculture. — First prize, a silver cup or money, value £10, H. Doughty, Sutton Garnsgate, Long Sutton (Thumper) ; second R. Tirams, Braunstone, Rugby. Highly commended : W. Barber, Congerstone, Atherstone. Com- mended : R. Timms. In-foal mare, best adapted to the general purposes of agri- culture— First prize, £15, W. Barber, Congerstone, Ather- stone ; second, £5, T. Stokes, Caldecote, Leicester. Highly commended : T. Marchant, Great Easton Park, Leicester. Commended: H. Burgess, jun. Foal, adapted to the general purposes of agriculture.— First prize, £5, T. Marchant ; second, H. Burgess. Highly com- mended : T. Stokes. Commended : 11. Wade, Manor House, Ashley, Market Harborough. Cart gelding or mare, four years old and not exceeding seven best adapted for dray purposes. — First prize, £15, H. Bur- gess ; second, £5, G. Bass, Bagworth Park, Leicester. Highly commended : T. Allen, Thurmaston, Commended : J. Slieild, Uppingham. CiTTLE. Judges (Sheep and Pigs). — R. J. Newton. J. S. Turner. J. Caswell. Fat ox. — First prize, £10, J. N. Beasley, Brampton Farm, Northampton ; second, £5, Sir W. de Capell Brooke, Bart. Reserve : S. Wallis, Barton Seagrave, Kettering. Fat cow or heifer. — First prize, £10, F. Cartwright, The Grove, Drakelow, Burton-on-Trent ; second, ^3, R. Wright, Nocton Heath, Lincoln. Sliorthorn bull, above one year and under two years old. — First prize, £7, W. S. Woodroffe, Normanton-ou-Soar. Shorthorn bull, over two years. — First prize, £7, R- Wade, Manor House, Ashley ; second, £3, W. H. Johnson, Braun- stone, Leicester. Shorthorn cow, in milk. — First prize, £5, J. J. Sharp, Broughton, Kettering ; second, £2, F. Cartwright, Ttie Grove, Drakelow. Reserve : R. Wade, Manor House, Ashley, Har- borough. In-calf Shorthorn heifer, above two and under three years old. — First prize, £5, J. J. Sharp, Broughton ; second, £2, C. Marriott, Cottesbach, Lutterworth. Shorthorn stirk, above one and under two years old. — First prize, £5, J. J. Sharp ; second, £2, C.Marriott, Cottesbach. Longhorn bull. — First prize, £5, W. T. Cox, Spondon Hall, Derby. Longhorn cow, in milk. — First prize, £5, S. Forrest, The Chase, Kenilworth. Reserve: J. Godfrey, Wigston Parva. Longhorn heifer, in calf abo»e two and under three years old.— First prize, £5, S. Forrest, The Chase. Reserve : W. T. Cox. SHEEP. Pure-bred Leicester shearling ram, the property of or hired by the exhibitor. — Eirst prize, £7, G. Turner, jun., Thorpe- 214 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. lands, Northampton ; second, £3, G. Turner, jun. Reserve : S. Spencer, Snarestone. Long:-woolled shearling ram, whether hired or not. — I'irst prize, £7, R. Johnson, Kirk Ireton, Wirksworth ; second, £3, R. Wright, Nocton Heath, Lincoln. Highly commended : T. W. D. Harris, Wootton, Northampton. Commended : T. W. D. Harris. Loapc-wooUed ram of any age, the property of or hired by the exhibitor.— First prize, £7, R. Wright, Nocton Heath, Lincoln ; second, £3, R. Johnson, Kirk Ireton, Wirksworth. Highly commended : R. Wright. Pen of three under twenty months old long-wooUed fat wether sheep. — First prize, £5, H. J. Hopkins, Moultou Grange Farm, Pitsford, Northampton ; second, £3, L. Will- more, the Newarke, Leicester. Pen of five long-woolled ewes. — First prize, £5, T. W. D. Harris, Wootton ; second, T. W. D. Harris. Pen of five long-woolled theaves, under twenty months old, intended for breeding purposes. — First prize, £5, T. W. D, Harris, Wootton ; second, £2, L. Willmore. Shropshire shearling rara, whether hired or not. — First prize, £5, W. H. Clare, Twycross, Atherstone. Highly com- mended : W. H. Clare. Pen of three under twenty months old Shropsliire fat wether sheep. — First prize, £5, S. C. Pilgrim, the Outwoods, Bur- bage, Hinckley. Pen of five Shropshire ewes.— First prize, £5; S. C. Pilgrim. Highly commended : W. H. Clare, Twycross. Pen of five Shropshire theaves under twenty months old, intended for breeding purposes. — First prize, £5, S. C. Pilgrim. PIGS. Boar of the large breed, whether hired or not. — First prize, £5, M. Walker, Stockley Park, Anslow, Burton-on-Trent ; second, £2, J. Wheeler, Long Compton, Shipton-on-Stour. Commended : R. E. Duckering, Northorpe, iivirton Lindsey. Boar of the small breed.— First prize, £5,R. E. Duckering ; second, M. Walker. Berkshire boar pig, not exceeding eighteen months old. — First prize, £5, M. Walker ; second, £3, J. Wheeler. Breeding sow of the large breed. — First prize, £5, J. Wheeler ; second, ^2, M. Walker. Highly commended : R. E. Duckering. Breeding sow of the small breed. — First prize, £5, R. E. Duckering ; second, £2, M. Walker. Highly commended : J . Wheeler and M. Walker. Three breeding pigs, of any breed, of one litter, not exceeding seven months old. — First prize, £5, R. E. Duckering ; second, £2, M. Walker. At the luncheon, Mr. Heygate. M.P., the Chairman said : In this county and district they had been happily entirely free, he hoped he might say, from those unfortunate circum- stances which they so much regretted to have seen occurring in the Eastern Counties of England. They might think them- selves very fortunate that the relations between capital and labour, as far as agriculture was concerned, were of a very much more happy description here. He did not take especial credit for either the labourer, the farmer, or the landlord for that circumstance ; it was probably owing to the fact that they had had in this county and district for many years past a much greater competition for labour, having side by side with the agricultural interest large manufacturing and mineral interests which had competed for labour, and consequently raised the rate of wages. In the Eastern Counties, as they knew, agri- culture was almost the on y industry, and consequently the demand for labour, increasing as it had done during the last few years, came upon them suddenly, and the result was, as they were aware, a disturbance of those relations between tenant farmer and labourer, which they so much regretted. He only hoped that now things would work themselves square, that they would settle down, and that those disturbed relations, of which he spoke, would become by degrees arranged in a happy and satisfactory manner. Whichever side might be considered to have gained the victory in this struggle, he hoped would use their success with moderation, and that they might see again those good feelings between all classes, landlord, tenant, and labourer, which had existed so long in this country, and which he hoped might still continue to exist. Referring to the agricultural implements, he might say that it must be an increasing source of interest every year to the occupier of land to see to what an extent he could utilize the mechinery so as to make himself more and more independent of strikes. Old prejudices as regarded machinery had without any question very generally passed away. He was only reading, a few days ago, a story of the late Sir Robert Peel, who had a show at Tamworth, some thirty or forty years since, and purchased a number of iron ploughs, and presented them to his tenants, and at the end of the year he was greatly disappointed that scarcely any of them would use them, as they said they wonld be sure to make the weeds grow. He thought they had got beyond that, and that there was an increasing feeling that they must take advantage of every agricultural implement which the ingenuity of science could invent. Mr.T. H. SiMPKiN : He wished to make a remark about the labour question. He thought the chairman set it rather low when he said that they had nothing at all to do with strikes here. He thonght they had. They took the bull by the horns at once : they saw the danger, and paid their men better, and they had been paid better here for the last eight or nine years than in any other district. Had the same thing been done elsewhere, when they found railways and manufactures to con- tend with, they might have avoided strikes also. He was not saying there were not great difficulties ; they had been short of men ; but he was glad to see that for the harvest there appeared abundance of labour. THE GLOUCESTERSHIRE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT TEWKESBURY. There were 48 entries of Shorthorns, and in bulls above two years old there were four competitors — viz., Mr. B. St. John Ackers's Cymbeliue, Mr. R. Stratton's Protector, Mr. W. Wilson's Earl of Warwickshire III., and the Rev. E. T. Williams's Earl of March, with Pro- tector put first. In the class 2, for bulls above one and under two years old, there were ten competitors. The three animals on which attention was concentrated included two Royal prize-winners, Mr. William Game's Aachen, and Col. Loyd Lindsay's Prince Rupert ; the first honours being here awarded to Aachen, and the second to Bountiful Duke, one year two months and a day old, bred by Mr. W. Woodward. Of the bull calves Col. Lindsay's Lord Rockville fairly distanced all the rest. He was first at the Royal and also at the Bath and West of England and the Reading Shows. Of breeding cows ten competed, but it cannot he said that tt olass was good. The competition in the class for heifers under three years old was better, and Mr. Bruce Kennard's celebrated Queen Mary, which ran away from everything else in her class at the Royal, was once more the Champion Shorthorn, as in Essex. The entries in the classes for Herefords were not numerous, but the bulls were declared by the judges to be equal to any ever ex- hibited. The competition in regard to these animals was so near that the judges were obliged to invite the assis- tance of the Shorthorn judges. There were only three entries — Mr. H. J. Bayley's King of the Dale, two years and six months old ; Messrs. T. Fenn and Harding's Bachelor, seven years two months one week and three days old ; and Mr. Philip Turner's Provost, five years and a week old. After a long consultation the judges awarded the reserve number to King of the Dale, and ultimately Bachelor was put first. The bull-calves were the weakest lot among the Herefords. In the class for breeding cows the first prize was awarded to Mr, T. Thomas's Rosalind, THE I^ARMER*S.MAGA2lNE. 215 and also the 5-guinea challenge cup, for the best pure-bred Hereford in any of the classes, she having taken the same cup last year at Bristol. The competition for three dairy cows was watched with much interest, and there was a display of a tolerably even lot of good animals ; but the judges had not much difficulty in making their awards, and the prize, by general consent, went to Mr. Joseph Stratton ; while the Channel Islands cattle werejust a good useful lot. Over the horses the awards of the judges did not receive the general approbation they generally do. Taken throughout, the horse show was a great improvement on those of previous years; and of sheep and pigs there was an average display. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES.— Shorthorns : S. Rich, The Cedars, Fearnal Heath, Worcester ; R. Doig, Lillingstone Hall, Bucking- ham. Herefords : T. Rogers, Coxail, Brampton Bryan ; W. Evans, Llandowlais Court, Usk. Sheep : VV. Rigden, Hove, Brighton ; R. Game, AlJsworth, Northleach ; R. H. Masfen, Pendeford, Wolverhampton. Pigs : C. Randell, Cliadbury, Evesham ; E. Little, Lanhill, Chippenham. Cart Horses : R. Craddock, Lynehara, Chipping Norton ; J. Rogers, Letchmoor, Presteign. Hunters and Road- sters : Major lleyvvood, Ocle Court, Hereford ; T. H. Hutchinson, Manor House, Catterick ; J. C. Croorae, Ba- geudon House, Cirencester. Cueese : C. Brunsdon, Holm, Hereford ; D. Long, Whaddon, Gloucester. CATTLE. SHORTHORNS. Bulls above two years old. — First prize, £20, R. Stratton, The Duffryn, Newport; second, £10, B. St. John Ackers, Prinknash Park. Reserved : J. Wilson- Wilson, Austin House, Broadway. Bull above one and under two years old. — First prize, £20, W. Game, Broadmoor, Northleach ; second, £10, W. Wood- ward, Tewkesbury. Reserved : Lieutenant-Colonel Loyd Lindsay, C.B., M.P. Bull above six montlis and nnder one years old. — First prize £10, Lieutenant-Colonel Loyd Lindsay ; second, £5, W. Game. Reserved and highly commended : Earl Beau- champ. Cow in calf, or in milk, having had a calf at its full time within twelve months of the day of exhibition. — First prize, £10, J. Stratton, Alton Priors ; second, £5, R. Stratton, Reserved and commended : J. Wilson- Wilson. Heifer in calf, or in milk, under three years old. — First prize, £10, R. Stratton ; second, £5, B. St. J. Ackers. Re- served and highly commended : Earl Beauchamp. Heifer under two years old. — First prize, £8, Rev. R. B. Kennard, Blandford ; second, £3, Viscount Sudeley. Reserved: J. Bickford, Bushbury. Heifer calf above six months and under one year old. — First prize, £5, Lieutenant-Colonel Loyd Lindsay ; second, £2 10s., 0. Viveash, Strensham. Reserved : B. St. J. Ackers. For the best pure bred Shorthorn in the yard. — Challenge cup, value 100 gs., Rev. R. B. Kennard. HEREFORDS. Bull above two years old. — First prize, £15, Fenn and Harding; second, £7 10s., P. Turner, Pembridge. Reserved: H. J. Baily, Rosedale. Bull above one and under two years old. — Prize, £15, H. N. Edwards, Leominster. Bull above six months and under one year old. — First prize, £6, T. Fenn, Ludlow ; second, £3, H. N. Edwards, Leo- minster. Cow in calf or in milk, having had a calf at its full time within twelve months of the day of exhibition. — First prize, £6, T. Thomas, Cowbridge ; second, £3, T. Thomas. Re- served : T. Cadle. Heifer in calf or in milk, under three years old. — Prize, £6, T. Fenn. Heifer under two years old. — First prize, £4 lOs., P. Turner. Heifer-calf above six months and under one year old. — F^rst prize, £3, H. N. Edwards ; second, £1 10s., H. N. Edwards. Reserved : E. J. Morris. For the best pure-bred Hereford in the yard. — Challenge cup, value 25 gs., T. Thomas. dairy cows. Three dairy cows in milk. — First prize, £20, J, Stratton ; second, £10, Earl Beauchamp. Reserve : J. Bickford, Moseley Hall, Bushbury. CHANNEL ISLANDS CATTLE. Bull of any age. — Prize, £i, Rev. C. W. Grove, the Mythe. Reserve: N. N. Dyer, Bredon. Cow or heifer in calf or in milk. — First prize, £4, Healing and Sons, Tewkesbury ; second, £2, N. N. Dyer, Bredon. Reserve : C. Andrew, Ham Court. Commended : S. J. Mar- tin, Upton-on- Severn. BREEDING SHEEP. LONG-WOOL. Yearling ram. — First prize, £7, R. Swanwick, Royal Agri- cultural College Farm, Cirencester ; second, £3, R. Swan- wick. Reserve : J. Gillett, Tangley, Chipping Norton. Ram of any other age. — First prize, £7, R. Swanwick ; second, £3, J. Wheeler, Long Compton. Reserve : H. E. Raynbird, Basingstoke. Highly commended : R. Swan- wick. F'ive yearling ewes. — I'irst prize, £8, R. Swanwick ; second £4, T. Thomas. SHORT-WOOLS. Yearling ram. — First prize, £7, H. S. Waller, Farmington ; second, £3, Sir W. Throckmorton, Buckland. Reserved: H. S. Waller. Ram of any other age. — First prize, £7, Sir AV. Throck- morton ; second, £3, H. S. Waller. Five yearling ewes. — F'irst prize, £8, Sir W. Throckmorton second, £4, H. S. Waller. OXFORDSHIRE DOWNS. Yearling ram.— First prize, £7, G. Wallis, Old Shifford ; second, £3, G. Wallis. Reserved : C. Hobbs, Maisey- hainpton. Ram of any other age. — First prize, £7, G. Wallis ; second, £3, G. Wallis. Five yearling ewes. — First prize, £8, G. Wallis; second, £4, W. T. fiorniblow. Ripple. SHROPSHIRE DOWNS. Yearling rara — First prize, £7, Mrs. Beach, Brewood ; second, £3, J. Pulley, Hereford. Reserved : J. H. B. Lutley, Brockhampton. Ram of any other age.— First prize, £7, W. Baker, Ather- stone ; second, £3, W. Baker. Five yearling ewes. — First prize, £8, Mrs. Beach ; second, £4, J, Pulley. Reserved and commended : W. Baker. PIGS. UNDER A YEAR OLD. Boar of the Berkshire breed. — First prize, £5, R. Swan- wick ; second, £2, W. Hewer, Sevenhampton. Reserved and highly commended : A. Stewart, Gloucester. Boar of any other breed.— First prize, £o, J. Dove, Bristol ; second, £2, M. Walker, Burton-on-Trent. Re- served : J. Dove. Sow of the Berkshire breed. — First prize, £4, A. Stewart, Gloucester ; second, £2, R. Swanwick. Highly commended: R. Swanwick. Sow of any other breed. — First prize, £4, M. Walker ; second, £2, J. Dove. Reserved and commended : M. Walker. OVER A YEAR OLD. Boar of the Berkshire breed. — First prize, £5, W. Hewer, Highworth ; second, £2, R. Swanwick. Reserved and highly commended : W. Hewer. Highly commended : H. Humfrey. Commended : H. Humfrey and A. Stewart. Boar of any other breed. — Prize, £5, J. Dove. Reserved : J. Wheeler Sow of the Berkshire breed. — Prize, £4, A. Stewart ; second, £2, R. Swanwick. Reserved and highly commended : H. Humfrey. Commended: H. Humfrey and R. Swanwick. Sow of any other breed. — First prize, £4, J. Wheeler; second, £2, J. Dove. Three sow pigs of the same litter, under nine months old. — First prize, £5, A. Stewart ; second, £2 10s., R. Swanwick. Reserved and highly commended : H. Humfrey. Commended: J . Wheeler. Sow and pigs (not less than six), her own produce, the pigs under twelve weeks old. — First prize, £5, A. Stewart; second, £2 10s., R. Swanwick. Reserved and highly com- mended: J. Wlieeler. 216 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. HORSES. Stallion for agricultural purposes, above two years old. — First prize, £20, J. Yeomaus, Wolverhampton ; second, £10, S. Davis, Pershore. Reserved: W. Wynn, Alcester. Mare and foal, her own offspring, for agricultural purposes. — First prize, £10, W. Friday; second, £5, R. Cochrane, Naunton. Reserved : I. James. Gelding or filly for agricultural purposes, above two aud undec three years old. — First prize, £10, H. Reynolds, Daunt- sey; second, £5, S.Davis, Woolashill. Reserved: W.Baker. Commended : E. Passey. Gelding or filly for agricultural purposes, under t«vo years old. — First prize, £8, withheld; second, £4', S. Davis. Stallion calculated to get hunters or hacks. — First prize, £25, Earl of Coventry; second, £10, M. Biddulph, M.P. Reserved: Major J.Ballard. Mare calculated to breed hunters, with her foal at foot, by a thoroughbred horse. — First prize, £10, C. Andrew, Upton- on-Severn ; second, £5, H. Carter, Almondsbury. Hunting mare or gelding of any age. — First prize, £20, T. H. Asliton, Temple Laugherne ; second, £10, F. P. Jones, Cheltenham. Reserved : T. Cook, Taddington. Hunting mare or gelding under five years old. — First prize, £15, W. Smith, Queenhill ; second, £6, T. H. Ashton. Re- served: T. W. Brain. The class highly commended. Hackaey, equal to carry 15 stone, not exceeding 15 hands high.— First prize, £10, withheld ; second, £5, W. JNicks, Gloucester. Hackney, equal to carry 12 stone, not exceeding 15 hands liigh. — First prize, £10, Major Quentin ; second, £5 5s., C. A. Jacobs, Clifton. Reserved: A. Perret. Pony, above 12 and not exceeding 13 hands high. — First prize, £7, C. A. Jacobs ; second, £4, C. Allen, Cirencester. Reserved : J. Bennett, Berkeley. Pony, not exceeding 12 hands, to be ridden in the ring by boys. — First prize, £5 5s., C. A. Jacobs ; second, £3, F. B. Jones, Cheltenham. Ladies' hack, to be ridden by ladies, exceeding 15 hands high.— Prize, £5, C. A. Jacobs. Harness horse, to be driven in harness round the ring. — Prize, £5, withheld. CHEESE. Hundredweight of thick cheese, not more than three cheeses to the hundred weight, made from land in his own occupation. — First prize, £5, S. M. Harding, Almondsbury ; second, £2 10s., J. Smith, Nupdown. Highly commended : S. M. Harding. Commended : H. Reynolds. Hundredweight of double cheese, not more than six nor less than four cheeses to the hundredweight, made from land in his own occupation. — First prize, £5, C. Harris, Berkeley ; second, £2 10s., T. Witchell, Nympsfield. Highly com- mended : J. Smith. Commended : H. Reynolds. Hundredweiglit of thin cheese, made from land in his own occupation, in the county of Gloucester. — First prize, £5, J. Smith, Thorubury ; second, £2 10s., E. Wilkins, Bourton-on- the-Water. Highly commended : C. Hadley. Commended : W. Harris. At the dinner, Mr. J. R. Yorke, M.P., said : Y'ou may ask "What has been done this session for agriculturists ?" I am afraid I cannot say we have done very much ; but then you must consider the circumstances under which the present Government came into office. They were called upon to pro- pose their measures with very little time for deliberation; they were surrounded by claimants of every description, some reasonable and others unreasonable ; and I am sure that in a session in which the ladiesthemselves have clamoured in vain for admission to the franchise the farmers of England will not be so ungallant as to regret that they were not preferred before the ladies. We have at any rate done something for the farmers this session — we have made an onward step in the matter of the relief of the grievances of the local taxpayers. Tiie tax upon horses has been taken off, which in some cases will prove a considerable relief to the farmers, though they were not com- pelled even heretofore to pay for the beasts they used for their own purposes. I hope that in the next session we shall be able to give you a better account of our proceedings. There are, however, one or two matters on which I may congratulate you. In the first place we have a better prospect of a good wheat crop than we have had for several years past ; and ia the next place news has lately reached us of what I hope will prove to be the final settlement of the agricultural labourers' dispute in the Eastern Counties. It is owing to the un- daunted courage and perseverance of the farmers in those counties that that dispute has been brought to a final termination. I can only express a hope that the farmers will be as moderate in their victory as they have been determined in the fight, and that they will recollect that the men who have been counselled to take a course which in the end has proved so disastrous to them, are kindly, honest, and simple folk, who have been misled by the men who have deluded them for their own purposes. Now the battle is over I trust that both parties will shake hands, and go on in the future as good friends as they have been in the past. Sir E. H. Leciimeke, the President, expressed a hope, with regard to the over-fatted pigs, that the Royal Agricultu ral Society, or one of the local societies, would some day devise a means by which they might have some standard in accordance with which such animals as pigs should be sent for exhibition, instead of their being exhibited as at present in a frightful state of obesity. He suggested the desirability of three such societies as the Hereford, the Worcester, and the Gloucester Agricultural Associations sometimes holding a united meeting. Mr. E. BowLY said : I hope this labour question is now settled. There is one thing whicli Mr. Arch and some of his people have been trumpeting about the country which I must deny. They say that if the land were divided into four-acre pieces we should be in a much better state than at present. I can only tell you that if you come to four-acre pieces you will be starved ; everybody knows that who knows anything they are talking about ; but these labourers, and a parcel of shopkeepers, shoemakers, and tailors, who go spouting about the country don't know any better. Let any practical man come to me, and I will take him a drive of fifty miles and show him that the largest farms are the best cultivated and produce the best crops (Shouts of " No, no," from outside the tent, and " Quite right," from within). Come up to me and I wi'l show you ; it is a parcel of liumbug to tell me differently. It was tried by Fergus O'Connor years ago, and he brought ruin on every parish in which he tried it. A CAUTION TO BUYERS.— A case has been in depen- deuce for some time before Sheriff Shirreff, which may prove useful as a hint to farmers to exercise as much caution as pos- sible in their transactions at cattle markets. At last JIa|low- Fair, Mr. Johnston, Letham Mains, accompanied by one of his sons and Mr. Cameron, a son-in-law, were in the marKCt looking after cattle. While there they were accosted by Aaron Sisson, a reputed cattle dealer, who showed them a lot of stirks, ten of which Mr. Johnston purchased for £95, £50 being at once paid in cash, and credit being given for th* remainder. Some time afterwards, Sisson met Andrew, another son of Mr. Johnston's, and asked him for a bill for the remain- der of the price of the cattle, which, on application to Mr. Cameron, was granted, and cashed by Sisson, Mr. Cameron duly meeting it at maturity. So far, to all appearance, the transaction seemed closed ; but Mr. Johnston, after the bill had been granted, was applied to by Messrs. Robert and Davjd Campbell, farmers and cattle dealers, Whitehaugh, Roxburgh- shire, for payment of the balance of the price of the cattle, founding their claim on the fact that the cattle sold were not the property of Sisson, but belonged to them at the time of the sale, and that Wr. Johnston, when he bought them, was aware of the real ownership. The claim resulted in an appli- cation to the Sheriff, who took a long proof in the case, and heard a good deal of evidence on both eides. The other day he issued his interlocutor, in which, after narrating the facts as they came out in the evidence, he finds that th.e balance of proof is in favour of the defender, aud that the pursuers have failed to prove that at the time of the sale Mr. Johnston was warned by them that the cattle belonged to them, and not to Sisson. He therefore leaves the pursuers to find their remedy against Sisson, who on his side asserts that he was part owner of the cattle, and assoilzies Mr. Johnston from the conclusion of the summons with expenses. THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 217 MALTON AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. PRIZELIST. JUDGES— Hunters and Hacks : 11. Botterill, WauJby Btough ; J. Hall, Sedgfield, Durham ; J. Holliday, Barm- ston, BiirlingtoD. CoACin:NCi and Agricultural: S. Robson, Deigliton, Wetherby ; J. Stephenson, Wlieldrake, York ; W. Stephenson, Cottingbam, Hull. Cattle, Sheep, and Pigs ; T. Dodds, Wakefield; W. Brown, Holrae-ou-Spalding Moor ; B. Tophara, Bainton, Driffield. Impleme:!^ts : W. Smith, Mowthorpe ; R. EUerby, Saltou. HORSES. Hunting colt foal. — First prize. Miss Starkey, Ilutton ; second, W. Muzcen, South Holme. Hunting filly foal.— First prize, W= Muzecn ; second, H. Watson, Filey. Coacbing colt or filly foal. — First prize, J. Wood, Gilling ; second, J. Reader, Hohue-on-Spaldiiig Moor. Roadster colt or filly foal. — First prize, J . Hickson, Swiuton ; second, W. Harrison, Slingsby. Agricultural colt foal. — First prize, T.Scoby, RookBarugh ; second, W. Tenuant, Selby. Commended : F. C. Lett, Leavening. Agricultural filly foal. — First prize, G. Olliver, OldMalton ; second, J. Elsworth, Yedingham. Yearly hunting gelding. — First prize, AV. Muzeeu ; second, J. Inman, Boroughbridge. Yearling hunting filly. — First yrize, R. Barker, Malton ; second, H. Bleasby, Carlisle. Yearling coaching gelding or filly. — First prize, J. Hodden, Langton , second, W. Welburn, Whitby. Yearling roadster gelding or filly. — First prize, W. Harrison ; second, R. Yates, Malton. Yearling agricultural gelding or filly. — First prize, T. Scoby ; second, H. .Brown, Strensall. TWO-YEAR-OLDS. Hunting gelding. — First prize, J. Sedman, Pickering ; second. Sir G. Cholmley, Howsham. Commended: L. Parker, Thorpebassett. Hunting filly. — First prize, S. B. Robson, Ganton ; second, W. Halton, Oswaldkirk. Coaching gelding or filly. — First prize, J. White, Easing- wold ; second, W. Peacock, Bulmer. Commended : J. Miles, West Heslerton. Roadster gelding or filly. — First prize, J. Campion, Thorpe- basset ; second, L. Parker. Agricultural gelding or filly. — First prize, W. Preston, Burythorpe ; second, G. Harrison, Ne\vton-on-Derwent. Commended : J. Stillborn, Uutton. three-tear-olbs. Hunting gelding. — First prize, J. P. Croraptou, Burton Agnes ; second, S. B. Robson, Ganton. Higlily commended : H. Watson, Filey. Hunting filly. — First prize, II. Brigbam, Settrington ; second, J. Lett, Scampston. Coaching gelding or filly. — First prize, G. Leefe, Fryton ; second, T. Stamper, Nunnington. Agricultural gelding or filly. — First prize, J. Cussons, Oswaldkirk ; second, W. Duggleby, Duggleby, Commended : W. Duggleby. BROOD MARES. Mare, with foal at foot, for hunting purposes. — First prize, II. Watson ; second, J. T. Robinson, Helperby. Highly commended : W. Muzeen. Mare, with foal at foot, for agricultural purposes. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson, Catterick ; second, W. Tennant. Mare, with foal at foot, for coaching purposes. — First prize, J. Reader; second, J. Wood. PONIES. Pony not exceeding l-i hands. — First prize, W. H. Black- man, Howden ; second, T. Mitchell, Bradford. Highly com- mended : H. Smithson. Malton. Pony not exceeding 13 hands. — I'irst prize, J. Robson, Old Malton; second. Rev. R. J. Cooper, Whitby. The class generally commended. Four-year-old hunting gelding or filly. — First prize, R. Holtby, Driffield ; second, R. EUerby, Salton. " Five-year-old hunting gelding or filly. — First prize, F. P. Newton, Norton ; second, W. Johnson, Norton. For jumping : First prize, T. Robson, Thornton Marshes; second, J. Burnett, Langton. Lady's hack. — First prize, J. Welburn, Scackleton Grange ; second, R. Barker, Malton. Geutlemau's hack. — First prize, W. H. Crauswick, Buiton Agnes ; second, C. Rose, Malton. Pair of agricultural horses, mares, or geldings, that have been regularly worked by a tenant-farmer, and used exclusively for farmiug purposes.— First prize, T. EUerby, Whitwell ; second, W. Tennant. Horse or mare of any age, that has been regularly used for carting purposes in the borough of Maltou. — First prize, W. and J. Metcalle, Maltou ; second, W. and G. Lovel, Norton. Gelding or mare for singU; harness, to be driven on the ground. — First prize, T. G. Mallory, Great Habton ; second C. Rose, Malton. Highly commended : W. Muzeen. Special Prizes. Foal, colt, or filly, by Black Douglas, — First prize, G. Olliver, Old Malton ; second, W. Thorpe, Scagglethorpe. Commended : J. llickes, Scaggletliorpe. Foal, colt, or filly, by George Osbaldeston. — First and second prizes, W. Muzeen. Foal, colt, or filiy, by Dear Tom. — First prize, Miss Starkey ; second, J. Hickson, Swinton. Foal, colt, or filly, by Dalby. — First prize, W. Boyes, Slingnby ; second, W. Smith, High Mowthorpe. Commended : E. Woodward, Welburn. Foal, colt, or filly, by Blooming Heather or WeUington.— First prize, F. C. Lett ; second, W. Bradshaw, Amotherby. Three-year-old agricultural gelding or filly. — Prize, silver cup, J. Headley, Catterick. Highly commended : J. Smith, Helperby. CATTLE. Bull, over one and under two years old. — First prize, C. and J. Smith, Westerdale ; second, C. Leonard, Sledmere. Higlily commended : Rev. AV. B. Prest, Ampleforth College. Bull, under twelve months old. — First prize, W. Smith, High Mowthorpe ; second, T. Stamper, Nunnington. Cow, in calf or milk. — First prize, T. H. Hutchison, Cat- terick ; second, executors of F.Jordan, Driffield. Highly com- mended : T. Stamper. Commended : J. Snarry, York. Heifer, over two and under tbree years. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson (objected to) ; second, T. Strickland, Thirsk. Highly commended : C. and J. Smith, Yarra. Heifer, over one and under two years old. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson ; second, T. Strickland. Highly commended : J. Corner, Slingsby. (First prize objected to on account of having won prize at the Royal or Yorkshire Sliow.) Heifer, under twelve months. — First prize, W. Smith, High Mowthorpe ; second, J. Corner. Beast of any age or breed. — First prize, J. Key, Musley Bank ; second, J. Fenwick, Swinton. Cottager's cow. — -Prize, J. Walker, Coneysthorpe. Bull of any age. — First prize, G. Jackson, East Ayton, York ; second, executors of F. Jordan. Highly commended: I. Garbutt, Farudale. Cow for dairy purposes. — First prize, J. Borton, Barton-le- Street ; second, F. Coates, Little Habton. Highly commended : J. Russell and Sons, Maltou. Best female animal in the yard. — Prize, T. H. Hutchinson. SHEEP. Aged ram. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson; second, W. Coverdale, Helmsley (Leicester). SliearUng ram. — First and second prizes, T. H. Hutchinson. Tup lamb. — Second prize, W. Coulson, Gatherley, Castle Howard. Five ginimer shearlings. — First prize, executors of F. Jordan ; second, T. H. Hutchinson. Highly commended: R. Tar- bottom, Cawton. Five giramer lambs. — First prize, A. Robson, Howe Bridge ; second, F. Coates. Five wether Iambs, — First prize, II. Robson ; second, F. Coates. 218 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. EsTR\ Stock. — Eirst prize, W. Coulsou ; second, G. Wright, Broughton. Five ewes that have suckled lambs up to the 1st July. — i First prize, cup, W. S. Lovel, Kuaptou ; secoad, T. H. Hutchinson. Highly coiuinended : W. Coverdale, Lund Court. Three shearling rams. — First prize, piece of plate, T. H. Hutchinson ; second, W. Kendall, East Ness. Highly com- mended : W. Coverdale. Best pen in classes 51, 53, and 53. — Prize, pieje of plate, executors of F. Jordan. PIGS. Sow, middle breed. — First prize, H. BlancharJ, Malton ; second, Major Worsley, Uovinghara ; extra, — Graham, Leeds. Boar, middle breed. — First prize, W, Lister, Armley, Leeds ; second, G. Sedgwick, York. Sow, small breed. — First prize, W. Lister ; second, G. Sedgwick. Boar, small breed. — First prize, — Graham ; second, G. Sedgwick. Three store pigs. — First prize, R. Smeetou, Mennithorpe ; second, T. Strickland, Thirsk Junction. Cottager's pig, rent under £12 per year. — First prize, — Graham ; second and third, E. Lawson, Elswell ; fourth, I. Dobson, Swinton. IMPLEMENTS. Corn hoe. — First prize, H. Bushell, York (Priest and Wool- noui^irs K.A..S. prize horse-hoe) ; second, R. Yates, Malton. Dijg-cart or Whitechapel. — First prize, Pickering and Co., Beverley ; second, F. Houlgate and Co., Scarborough. Swing-gate. — First prize, H. Bushell; second. Read, Malton. Blacksmith, shoeing horses for riding. — First prize, J. Yorke, Malton ; second, J. Waller, Malton. Stand of implements. — First prize, R. Yates ; second, T. Read. Single-horse waggonette. — Prize, Pickering and Co. THE DORCHESTER AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT DORCHESTER. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES. — Cattle a2s'd Horses : J. Ford Rushton ; J. Coate, Hammoon ; Walter Farthing, Bridgwater. Sheep : E. Cave, Aimer, Blandford : Culvervvell, North Petherton, Bridgwater ; and G. Tett, Chesilborne. CATTLE. Bull under two years. — Prize, £3, J. A. Smith, Bradford Peverell. Three heifers, under two years old, — Prize, £5, J. A. Smith. Bull, above two years old. — Prize, £5, C. Davy, Horn Park, Beaminster. Highly commended : S. Bennett, Wareham. Three dairy cows, under seven years old. — Prize, £5, J. A. Smith. Three heifers under three years old. — Prize, £3, J. A. Smith. SHEEP. Dorset ram.— Prize £3, A. J. Pitfield, Eype. Southdown ram. — Prize, £2, G. W. Homer, Athalhamp- tou. Short-woolled ram, otherwise than horned or Southdown. — Prize, £2, and highly commended, T. C. Saunders, Water- combe. One-year Dorset ram. — Prize, £3, A. J. Pitfield. One-year Southdown ram. — Prize, £3, G. VV. Homer. One-year old short-woolled ram, otherwise than horned or Southdown. — Prize, £3, T. C. Saunders. Pair of Dorset ram lambs. — Prize, £1, A. J. Pitfield. Pair of Southdown ram lambs. — Prize, £1, G. W. Homer. Pair of short-woolled ram lambs, otherwise than horned or Southdown.— Prize, £1, G. W. Homer. Horn stock ewes (100) under two years old. — Prize, £5, W" S. Hull, Druce. Twenty Southdown full-mouthed ewes. — Prize, £5, Harding, Watersou. Twenty short-woolled ewes, otherwise than horned or Southdown, under two years old. — Prize, £5, T. C. Saunders. Down stock ewes (100), under two years old. — Prize £5, B. Baunton, West Knighton. Twenty Dorset full-mouthed ewes. — Prize, £5, A. J. Pit- field. Twenty Dorset ewes, under two years old. — Prize, £5, A. J Pitfield. Twenty short-woolled full-mouthed ewes, otherwise than horned or Southdown. — Prize, £5, G. Wood Homer. Twenty Soutlidown ewes, under two years old. — Prize, £5, E. Baunton, West Knighton. Twenty chilver lambs. — Prize, £5, J. H. Saunders, Forston. PIGS. Boar. — Prize, £5, H. W. Hawkins, Martinstown. Three breeding sows. — Prize, £5, J. A. Smith. Highly commended : T. VValden, Came. HORSES. Pair of cart horses, not exceeding five yearsof age.— Prize, £5, T. Chick, Stratton. Cart stallion.— Prize, £5, T. Chick. Hackney colt or filly, under four years old. — Prize, £5, Chamen, Charminster. Highly commended : Mr. Hooper, Turner's Puddle. Cart, colt or filly, under three years olJ. — Prize, £5, J. H. Saunders, Forston. Highly commended : J.A.Smith. Cart mare and foal, — Prize, £5, J. Chick, East Compton. Highly commended : T. A. Homer, Tolpuddle. THE BRIDLINGTON AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. The entries were more numerous than at any previous show of the Society : sheep 34, cattle 23, horses 205, pigs 30. The sheep included shearlings from Mr. Hutchinson's flock at Catterick, and many from farms in this district, and Mr. Hutchinson was also a large ex- hibitor of Shorthorns. Sir Talbot Constable, was another successful exhibitor of stock bred on his own estate. The principal award for aged Shorthorns, however, went to Knight of the Vale. The huuters included among their number the majority of prize-takers. King of Dia- monds, Palmerston, Rover, and some 16 others being entered for the silver cup for the best hunter. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES. — Sheep, Cattle, Pigs, and Agriculturai, Horses : J. Simpson, Staveley, Tibthorpe, Driffield ; W. Brown, Holme-on-Spalding-Moor ; T. Barber, Sproatley Rise, Hull. Hunting, Roadster, and Coaching Horses : T. EUerby, Whitwell, York ; J. T. Robinson, Leckby Palace, Thirsk ; T. Robinson, Nuthill, Hedon. SHEEP. Shearling ram adapted for the district. — First prize, S. Tatham and C. T. Leake, Brough ; second, J. J. Simpson, Hunmanby. Pen of three shearling rams adapted for the district. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson, Catterick ; second, J. J. Simpson. Pen of five shearling gimraers. — First prize, T. H. Hutch- son ; second, R. Tarbotton, Cauton Gilling. The FARMER'S MAGA2INE. 219 Ten wether lambs. — First prize, J. and C. Nesfield, Buckton ; second, E. A. Hay, Buckton. Ten gimmer iambs. — First prize, E. H. Bowser, Reighton ; second, J. J. Simpson. Extra Stock.— Ten gimmer lambs: First prize, £. H. Bowser; second, J. J. Simpson. SHORTHORNS. Two years old or aged bull — First prize, G. Jackson, Ayton ; second, G. Harrison, Newton-on-Derwent. Yearling bull. — First prize. Sir T. C. Constable, Hull ; second, J. T. Robinson, Driffield. Bull-calf under twelve months old. — Prize, Sir T. C. Con- stable. Cow in calf or in milk. — First and second prizes, T. H. Hutchinson. Two years old heifer. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson ; second, F. Strickland, Thirsk. Yearling heifer. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson ; second, F. Strickland. Fat ox, cow, or heiler of any age. — Prize, T. Crorapton, Lowthorpe. HORSES. Hunting mare and foal. — First prize, H. Watson, Filey; second. Sir G. Cholmley, Bart., Boynton Hall. Three years old hunting gelding. — First prize, J. P. Cromp- ton, Bridlington ; second, S. B. Robson, York. Two years old hunting gelding or filly. — First prize, H. Watson, Newbegin, Filey; second, J. J. D. Jefferson, Thicket Priory, York. One-year-old hunting gelding or filly. — First prize, Sir G. Cholmley, Boynton Hall ; second, W. Hall, North Burton, York. Coaching mare and foal. — First prize, J. Reader, Holme on Spalding Moor, York ; second, J. Train, Anlaby, Hull. Three years old coaching gelding. — First and second prizes, J. Johnson, Brigham, Drittield. Three years old coaching filly. — Prize, J. Kirby, Burton Fields, Stamford Bridge. Mare or gelding for agricultural purposes. — Eirst prize, cup, W. H. Crauswick, Thorpholme ; second, W. Stephenson, Cottingham. Hackney mare and foal. — First prize, Mrs. Cook, Huggate, Pocklington ; second, Mr. Agnello, Kirby, Market Weighton. Three years old hackney gelding or filly. — First prize, W. Stephenson ; second, J. Major, York. Two years (U hackney gelding or filly. — First prize, J. Wilde, Holme, York; second, J. Taylor, jun., Burton Agnes. Mare or gelding for agricultural purposes. — First prize, cup, W. Tennant, Barlow, Selby ; second, VV. Tennant. Mare and foal for agricultural purposes. — First prize, R. Wise, Bridlington ; second, Mrs. WoodcgcV, Flaiubro' Head Farm. Three years old agricultural gelding or filly. — First prize, T. Hornby, Wausford ; second, J. Sawden, Bessingby. Two years old agricultural gelding or filly. — First prize, G. Everiughani, Brough ; second, E. Nesfield, Scarbro'. Nag or mare pony, not exceeding 14 hands high. — First prize, cup, J. W. Jordan, North Burton; second, J. Scott, South Cliff, Brough. Nag or mire pony, not exceeding 13 hands high. — First prize, C. B. Hudson, Harpham ; second, A. Blanshard, Whit- ton Brigg. Hunting stallion. — First prize, W. H. Simpson, Market Weighton ; second, H. Trowell, Preston, Hull. Roadster stallion. — First prize, G. and D. Bourdas, Brid- lington ; second, R. Cowton, Kelk, Lowthorpe. Coaching stallion. — First prize, R. Harper, Risby, Beverley ; second, J. Sherbourne, High Calton, York. Stallion fJV agricultural purposes. — First prize; W. Robson, Old Malton ; second, J. Johnson, Bempton. SPE(JI.4.L PRIZES. Hunting mare or gelding, any age. — First prize, cup, H. Jewison, Raisthorpe, York (Palmerston) ; second, T. Darrell, Spicker's-hill, West Ayton, York. Highly commended : J. P. Cormpton, Thornhole, Bridlington. Hunting mare or gelding, four years old. — Prize, cup, T. Darrell. Best jumper of any description. — First prize, cup, W. W. Lovel, Nafi'erton Grange, Driffield ; second, J. P. Crorapton. Lady's hack that has not won a prize. — Prize, 2 gs., W. Simpson, Bridlington. PIGS. Boar, large breed. — First prize, W. Lister, Armley, Leeds ; second, G. Chapman, Searaer, Scarborough. Sow or gilt, large breed. — F'irst prize, Mr. Graham, Leeds ; second, W. Lister. Boar, middle breed. — First prize, Mr. Graham ; second, G. Chapman. Sow or gilt, middle breed. — First prize, W. Lister ; second H. Blanshard, Malton. THE HIGHLAND AND AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND. MEETING AT INVERNESS. It must be a matter of wonder to the older Highland Chiefs and the members of their clans, of whom there are here some grand specimens dressed in their picturesque costume, to see in this their Highland capital, 200 miles north of Edinburgh, such an exhibition of implements and stock as is now shown brought together. The first Agri- cultural Show which was held at Inverness was in 1831, at which time the total stock shown was 428, implements 4, premiums offered £318 ; whilst now the total stock is 1,597, implements 1,000, premiums £3,030 : such has been the effect upon the Highland Society of the progress of enterprise and civilisation — aided, doubtless, most materially by the indefatigable exertions of the Society's past and present secretaries, who, with a small private staff of assistants, appear to bear or have borne upon their shoulders the whole management. A great number of the implements were despatched by the exhibitors early in last week, and many of the cattle arrived on Saturday night ; and thus, notwithstand- ing the limited facilities afforded by a single line of rail- way, and a little grumbling on the part of passengers, when the judges entered the yard on Tuesday everything appeared orderly and in its place. After a short com- mittee-meeting, the judges were handed over to the care of attending members, policemen, and an army of men with ropes; and so despatched to their dutiesin a most methodical and characteristic manner. In the midst of their labours occurred a thunderstorm of almost tropical violence ; the rain fell in torrents ; the field being flat, was almost flooded; and directors, attending members, and judges might be seen clambering about from hurdle to hurdle in a most undignified manner, to escape the pools of water which threatened to swallow them up. The roof of the Grand Stand was struck with lightning, and then blown clean off by the wind ; happily, without damage to man or beast. The Shorthorn classes were well represented, and although there were several blank stalls amongst the aged bulls, yet that class cannot be said to have been badly represented, when two such bulls as Lord Irwin and the Duke of Aosta were in it. As might have been expected when two such champions met, each one had its admirers and friends ; and we suspect that the judges themselves were somewhat divided in opinion as to which they should put first. We rather fancied the younger one, for he has beautiful quality, straight back, well-sprung ribs, and good flanks ; whilst the old one is a little in- clined to be gutty, and therefore, too, does not look so good in the llauk ; still, he is a great animal. Mr. Linton's two-year-old is a good quality beast, but what we 220 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. thought the most promising bull iu the Show was Mr. Browne's (of ChathUl) yearling bull-calf Rosario, by Duke of Aosta. He is quite worthy of his sire, and, if lucky, will soon equal if not excel him. He is a trifle coarse iu his horn, but will improve of that. In the old cow class Her Majesty shows a very good- looking auimal — Coldcream 4th ; but slie was not noticed by the judges ; and Mr. R. Bruce took first prize with a very pretty little cow — good quality aud back. Mr. Lawrence's eutry is a liue, long, guod-coated beast, aud one not easy to beat in a competition. Her Majesty's first prize heifer is " little and good ;" whilst Mr. Cran, a local breeder, does credit to his county by bringing forward Nectar in this class, and bearing oflf third prize. jNIr. ]\Iarr shows a very beautiful heifer-calf, aud the Duke of Richmond brings out a very nice couple. Indeed, the Shorthorns on this side of the Border are very good, and England will have to "look to herself;" for the Scotch have in their Shorthorns, not only size and quality, but also constitution, from the healthy manner iu which they keep their stock. Thus, on our road here, we stayed at Fisher's Hotel, Pitlochrie (well-known to tourists), aud hearing Mr. Fisher had been a breeder of Shorthorns for twenty years, we asked him to show them to us. After a walk of about a mile, we arrived at a field of clover on a mountain-side, really divided only by a wall from the hill pasture of heather and woods. Here, to our astonish- ment, we found a splendid herd of Shorthorn cows and calves grazing, of pure Booth and Knightley blood, look- ing iu good bloom and condition. And Mr. Fisher assured us that they had uo artificial food, but ouly what they could pick up for themselves ; adding that he had made up his mind to sell off the whole herd in October. We could not help thinking that those who want quality, size, and constitution should attend the sale. One great feature in this show is the splendid class of Polled Angus : as we were told it was the best display ever seen. They have size and quality, and are also said to have good feeding and milking qualities — are hardy and appear to come early to maturity. The friends of the Galloway cattle, however, claim for them superiority in hardihood, milking, and feeding properties ; but they appear to us to be coarser in quality and hair, and alto- gether not such '■' taking" animals. The first beast in the class was an old bull, which had wou first prize at Kelso iu 1872, a very large, long auimal, but not in show condition, probably because in this class, as also in other classes, the bull and cow which have taken the Society's prize at a previous show appear to be brought up at the ensuing show to receive a gold medal without com- petition. The Duke of Buccleueh bore off most of the prizes in the Galloway and Ayrshire classes, there not being a great show of Galloways. The Ayrshire entries were not large, but very eood. The first-prize old bull is a fine beast, with capital quarters, but a llittle want of rib. Amongst the cows iu milk cases were discovered in which their udders and teats had been " doctored" before entering the show-yard, for the purpose of improving their appearance. We are sure, in some cases, that the owners had not lent themselves to such a proceeding, and that the directors need only promulgate their views on the matter to exhibitors, and the practice will be stopped, especially if it were publicly notified that all cows would be examined by competent judges on their eutry into the show-yard. Perhaps the best cow of this class was the Duke of Buccleuch's Modesty, though in point of size she was distanced by the second-prize cow belonging to Mr. Graham, of Paisley : to an Englishman's eye the latter appeared the more useful animal to breed from; but she is said to be almost too large for the pastures in the West. The Highlanders were grand beasts, and a large class, Mr. John Stewart taking the gold medal for a magnifi- cent black cow, seven years old. There appears to be some difllculty in this class, on account of the animals' wildness, in ascertaining their ages, and in making sure that no animal is shown in a class to which it is not entitled. The first-prize four-year-old fat ox, belonging to Sir W. Gordon Gumming, is a perfect mountain of flesh. The show of Clydesdales was quite up to the average, especially when we remember that the breed has only of late years penetrated so far north as Inverness. We think Mr. Riddell's Never-Mind-Him a good horse, and fairly entitled to the first prize ; but in the three-year-old class we can scarcely coincide with the judges' decision. Honest Sanday is a nice colt, but wants middle ; whilst the second-prize horse is bigger and better in most of his points. The mares in foal were a very good class ; and amongst the two-year-olds Mr. Hurdle's filly was'quite admirable. We thought Mr. Clarke's first-prize carriage horse looked more like hunting than "machinery ;" while Sir Dudley IMarjoribanks shows two nice harness horses, two roadsters, and a very good pony under 14 hands. But the chief sight of the day was a little roan pony under 12 hands, belonging to Miss Norton, Rannock Lodge — a perfect picture, like a beautiful miniature coach-horse, for which we understand the fortunate owner had £300 bid at Islington. The hunters were not good, and the leaping a failure. The sheep at the show consisted chiefly of Cheviot, Border Leicester, and Blackfaced or Mountain sheep; of which three classes there was a good and large display. To begin with the Cheviots, it struck us that no animal ap- peared more capable of improvement by care and breeding than this. One could scarcely suppose that some of the prize animals here were of the same genus as those one occasionally sees hawked about at markets under the name of Cheviots. The first-prize tup above one shear was a beautiful short-legged, good- woolled auimal, full of mutton, really almost fit, as far as shape went, to compete as a Southdown. The first-prize shearling tup was a pretty sheep ; but evidently his owner, Mr. Johnson, of Moffat, for some reason best known to himself had not given sufficient time or pains to get him into show condition, and we fancied the judges had shown considerable discrimination in selecting this sheep for the first prize. Amongst the blackfaced sections, Mr. Archibald, of Overshiels, showed some grand sheep, such as might produce first-class four-year-old wether mutton ; and the Border Leicester was a good class. Mr. Thomas Foster, Northumberland, carried off the first prize amongst the tups above one shear with a fine large sheep, good quality aud wool ; whilst among the shearling tups we fancied Mr. Andrew Smith's sheep, who took the third prize, and also thought that if Sir George Dunbar could have brought up five gimmers as good as were four of his lot, he might have had a chance of bearing off' the highest honours instead of only third. Mr. Colman showed two good tups in the Southdown class; if both first and second-prize sheep wei'e somewhat deficient behind, and the latter also iuclined to " tun to gut," whilst his ewes were a very nice lot and of good character. We thought Mr. Colman's shepherd entitled to great credit for the way in which his sheep were got up. We observed in the Shropshire tup class that the judges did not award a first prize ; as we presume they considered Lord Strath- more's sheep to which they awarded second prize did not not come up to the mark with regard to his back whilst possibly they considered the third prize sheep, somewhat coarse and short, and doubtlessly he had large slugs or horns. There was another very good three-shear THE FARMEK'S MAGAZINE. 221 sheep of Lord Strathmore's in the yard, but he was not qualified to compete, as he had won the Society's pri^e last year. The Strathmore gimmers (first prize) were good ; but in this class, and in several other sections, the sheep's tails were cut otf so short that it is impossible to kuow whether they would or not have had good docks. Amongst the cross-bred hoggs, there were three very good sheep exhibited by Mr. Sutherland, and got by a Shropshire tup out of Cheviot-Leicester ewes. The implement show was large, but with nothing very worthy of noting for its novelty. There were Hughes' patent laid-corn lifter, a very useful-looking implement, invented by a Midland Counties tenant-farmer ; Hope's improved stone-crusher, and the Sutherland plough, which we hope, by his Grace's kind invitation to the directors and judges, to see at work at Lairg. We understand the Duke intends to bring into cultivation by means of this plough one thousand acres a year at a cost of about £24 per acre, and it is supposed the rental value of the land afterwards will average about £1 per acre. His Grace is said to have 40,000 acres to work on. The Inverness Show has certainly been a success in one way if not in another. Up to Wednesday evening the receipts were £600 short of those at Stirling last year, at the same period of the show ; and yet Stirling meeting entailed a loss. We caunot conclude this letter without acknowledging the extreme kindness and courtesy with which we have been treated by every member of the Society with whom we have been brought in contact. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES.— Cattle— Shorthorns : J. Reid, Greystone, Al- ford, Aberdeen ; J.Wood, Harewood Hill, Darlington : A. Youne, Keir Mains, Dumblane. Polled Angus or Aberdeen : The Hon. Charles Carnegie ; R. Hampton, Castle Fraser, Aberdeen ; G. J. Walker, Portletlien, Aberdeen. Gallo- ways: M. Clark, Culmain, Crocketford; VV. Routledge, Elrig, Port William. Ayrshire : H. D. B. Hyslop, Tower, Sanquhar ; H. Kirkwood, Killermont, Maryhill, Glasgow ; D. Tweedie, Castle Crawford, Abin gton. Highland : D. Fayer, Knowehead, Carapsie, J. M'Arthur, Accurach, luvn- rary ; D. Stewart, Achalader, Tyndrum. Pat stock : M. Elliot, flesher, Inverness ; J. Geddes, Orbliston, Pocliabers ; A. Mitchell, Alloa. Horses — For agricultural purposes : S. Clark, Manswrae, Kilbarchan ; J. Dove, Crosshall, Coldstream ; L. Drew, Merryton, Hamilton. Hunters, roadsters, and ponies : J. Hope, Duddingston, Edinburgh ; N. Milne, Paldenside, Melrose ; A. Gillon, Wallhouse. Sheip — Cheviot : G. Maccall, Burrance, Lockerbie ; J. Miller, Downreay, Thurso; J. Scott, Delorain, Selkirk. Blackfaced : [As for Highland cattle.] Border, Leicester, and other longwoolled sheep ; T. Ferguson, Kennocktay, Coupar Angus ; R. Hardie, Harrietfield, Kelso ; T. Harris, Stoneylane, Bromsgrove. Southdown, Shropshire, and other shortwoolled sheep : R. Scot Skirving, Caraptown, Drem ; R. C. Yeoman, Marske Hall, Marske, Yorkshire. Pigs : J. Gibson, Woolmet, Dalkeith ; C. Small Keir, Kindrogan, Pit-, lochrie ; P. B. Swiuton, Holyn Bank, Haddington. Collie Dogs : Cluny Macpherson, Cluny Castle, Kingussie J. Blake, Dunrobin Mains, Golspie. Implements — The Society's inspecting committee : W. Hunter, Thurston ; D. Stevenson, C.E. ; J. D. Park, Edinbnrgh ; Professor Wil- son, Edinburgh ; J. Munro, Fairnington, Kelso ; T. Mylne, Nyddrie Mains ; R. Wilson, Durn, Perth ; R. Hutchinson, Carlo wrie, Kirkliston. CATTLE. SnORTHOIlXS. Bulls calved before 1st January, 1872. — First prize, R. Bruce, Newton of Stutbers, Forres ; second, A. H. Browne, Doxford, Chathill, Northumberland ; third, W. Marr, Upper- mill, Tarves ; fourth, W. Scott, Glendronach, Huntly. Bulls calved alter 1st January, 1872. — First prize, W Linton, Sheriff Hutton, York ; second, J. Fletcher, Rosehaugh Avoch ; third, E. Baillie, Dochfour, Inverness. Bulls calved after 1st January, 1873. — First prize, A. H- Browne; second, J. Bruce. Burnside, Fochabers; third, E, Baillie ; fourth, R. Scott, Manbean, Elgin. First prize cows at former shows, exhibited for medium gold medal (Stirliug, 1873), when the property of present exhibitors. — A. H. Browne. Cows of any age. — First prize, R. Bruce ; second, W. Mitchells, Aucnagathle ; third, J. Cran, Kirkton, Invernes s ; fourth, J. Laurence, Thornhill, Forres. Heifers calved after 1st January, 1872.— First prize. The Queen; second, W. S. Marr, Uppermill ; third, J. Cran; fourth, A. Longmore, Retrie, Banff. Heifers calved after 1st January, 1873.— First prize, W. S. Marr ; second. The Duke of Richmond, Gordon Castle, Fochabers ; third, J. Bruce ; fourth, J. J.Sharpe, Broughton, Kettering, Northampton. POLLED ANGUS OR ABERDEEN. First prize bulls at former shows, exhibited for medium gold medal (Kelso, 1872), Sir G. Macpherson Grant, of Bal- lindalloch, Bart. (Adrian). Bull calved before 1st January, 1872. — First prize, A. Bowie, Mains of Kelly, Arbroath ; second, the Earl of Fife, K.T., Duff House; third. Sir G. Macpherson Grant; fourth, W. Robertson, Burnside, Ballindalloch. Bulls calved after 1st January, 1872. — First prize, J. Scott, Easter TuUoch, Stonehaven ; second, G. Reid, Baads, Pater- culter; third, G.Gordon, TuUochhallura, Dufftown ; fourth, J. Morrison, Auchlen, Turriff. Bulls calved after 1st January, 1873.— First prize. The Earl of Fife ; second, G. Reid ; third, W. M'Combie, Easter Skene ; fourth, W. J. Taylor, Rothiemay House, Huntly. First prize cows at former shows, exhibited for medium gold medal (Stirling, 1873), when the property of the present exhibitor. Sir G. Macpherson Grant (Bertha). Cows of any age.— First prize, W. Taylor, Rothiemay House; second. Earl of Fife; third, Sir G. Macpherson Grant ; fourth. Marquis of Huntly, Aboyne Castle. Heifers calved after Ist January, 1872.— First and second prizes. Earl of Fife; third, W. M. Skinner, Drumin, Ballin- dalloch ; fourth, G. Reid. Heifers calved after 1st January, 1873.— First and second prizes, G. Read ; third, the Earl of Fife ; fourth, the Marquis of Huntly. GALLOWAYS. First prize bull at former shows, exhibited for medium gold medal (Stirling, 1873), when the property of the present ex- hibitor, J. Cunningham, Tarbreoch, Dalbeattie (PretenJer). Bulls calved before 1st January, 1873.— First prize, The Duke of Buccleuch; second, R. Jardine, Castlemilk ; third, G. Graham, Oakbank, Longtown (breeder of the best bull). First prize cows at former shows exhibited for medium gold medal (Stirling, 1873), when the property of the present exhibitor. The Duke of Buccleuch (Louisa 2ud). Cows of any age- — First and second prizes, the Duke of Buccleuch ; third, F. Graham, Parceltown, Longtown. Heifers calved after 1st January, 1872.— First prize, the Duke of Buccleuch ; second and third, J. Cunningham. Heifers calved after 1st January, 1873.— First and second prizes, the Duke of Buccleuch ; third, J. Cunningham. AYRSHIRE. Bulls calved before 1st January, 1873.— First prize, the Duke of Buccleuch ; second, R. Wardrope, Garlaff, Cumnock ; third, D. Edmond, Ballochruin, Balfron ; fourth, Sir M. S. Stewart, Ardgowan. ,.,.,, j- First-prize cows at former shows, exhibited for medium gold medal (Stirling, 1873), when in milk, and the property of the present exhibitor.— R. Wilson, Forehouse, Kilbarchau (Ilornie). ^ , .^ , . Cows in milk, of any age.— First prize, Duke of Buccleuch ; second, R. Wilson ; third, Duke of Buccleuch ; fourth. Duchess Dowager of Athole. . ,„,:., c it Cows in calf, of any age, or heifers in ealf, calved before 1st January, 1872.— First prize, Duke of Buccleuch ; second, J Graham, Oklsmitlihills-street, Paisley; third, D. Ross- fourth, J. Stewart, Burnside Cottage, Strathayen _ Heifers calved atter 1st January, 1872.-First prize, Duke of Buccleuch ; second, vV. M. Ure, Bogton, Falkirk ; third, J. Stewart; fourth, Duke of Buccleuch. Heifers calved after 1st January, 1872.— First, second, and third prizes, Duke of Buccleuch ; fourth, J. Stewart. p 2 222 1:HE FARMER'S MAGAZINE HIGHLAND. First-prizo bulls at former shows, exhibited for medium gold medal (Kelso, 1872), when the property of the present exhibitor. — The Hon. Lady Menzies, Raunoch Lodge, Pit- lochrie (Rannocli). Bulls calved before 1st January, 1871. — First prize.Duke of Athole; second, A. Stevenson, Lochawe ; third, Cluny Mac- pherson; fourth, Duke of Sutherland. Bulls calved after Ist January, 1871. — First prize, J. Grant, Liverlaidnan, Carrbridge ; second, the Earl of Seatirld; third, W. Fraser, Lairg ; fourth, Dnke of Sutherland. Bulls calved after 1st Januiry, 1873. — First prize, J. Stewart, Bochastle, Callander; second. Lord Middleton, L)ch- carron ; third and fourth, J. Stewart, Portree. Bulls calved after 1st, January, 1873. — First prize, A. Stewart, Ensay, Stornoway ; second and third, Earl of Sea- field ; fourlh. Colonel Greenhill Gardvne, Mu'l. CoH-si ot iinv R-^f. — b'irst am) s.-i-ond prizes, Uuke of Athole; third, J. Stewart ; fourth. Earl of Seafield. Heifers calved after 1st Januiry, 1871.— First prize, Duke of Aihole; second, J. Stewart; third, Hugh Mann, Meadow- field, Nairn ; fourth, Earl of Seafield. Heifers calved after 1st January, 1872. — First prize, J. Stewart; second, Duke of A.thole; third. Earl of Seafield ; fourth, C. M. Campbell, Balliniore. Heifers calved alter 1st January, 1873. — First prize, J. Stewart ; second, third, and fourth, Earl of Seafield. FAT STOCK. Shorthorn oxen calved after 1st January, 1871. — First prize, R. Bruce, Newton-ol-Struthers ; second, J. Cran,Kirkton, In- verness. Shorthorn oxen calved after 1st January, 1873. — First prize, R. 11. Harris, Earnliill, Forres. Highland oxen calved after 1st January, 1870. — First prize, Sir W. G. Gumming, Altyre; second, Duke of Sutherland ; tliird. Earl of Seafield. Commended : Sir D. C. Majoribanks, Guisachan, M.P. Highland oxen calved after 1st January, 1871. — First prize. Sir W. G. Camming; second. Sir D. C. Majoribanks; third, E. Baillie, Dochfour. Commended: Sir D. C. Majoribanks. Oxen of any other pure or cross breed calved after 1st January, 1871.— First prize, A. Mathieson, Ardross, M.P. ; second, A. Munro, Ord, Invergorden ; third, J. and \V. Martin, Aberdeen. Oxen of any pure or cross breed calved after 1st January, 1873. — First prize, Messrs. J. and W. Martin ; second, J, Cran, Kirkton ; third, W. Brown, Linkwood, Elgin. Cross-bred heifers calved after 1st January, 1871. — First prize, G. Grant, Polio, Invergordon. Cross-bred heifers calved after 1st January, 1873. — J. Cran, second, J. and W. Martin. EXTRA CATTLE. Highly commended and minor gold medal : R. H. Harris, (Short-horn). Highly oramended and silver medal; R. il. Harris (Devon). Commended and medium meda!s awarded : Earl of Seafield (Highland). HORSES. HORSES FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES. Stallions, foaled before 1st January, 1871. — First prize, D. Riddell, Kilbowie ; second, J. Duncan, Methlick, Aberdeen ; third, D. Riddell; fourth, P. Crawford, Drumgoyack, Strath- barne. Entire colts, foaled after 1st January, 1871.— First prize, D. Riddell ; second, R. Andrews, Allen, Paisley ; third, R. Brewster, Bridge of Weir ; fourth, A. M. Ogilvy, Tillinaught, Portsoy. Entire colts, foaled after 1st January, 1873. — First prize, R.Brewster, second, D. Riddell; third, R. Andrews; fourth, ihe Earl of Strathraore, Glamis. Entire colts, foaled after 1st January, 1873. — First prize, D. Riddell; second, A. Weir, Newhouse Mill, Kilbridge ; third, J. Lawrence, Thornhill, Forres ; fourth, Sir W. G. Gordon Gumming of Altyre. Mares (with foal at foot), foaled before the Ist January, 1871. — First prize, J. Sutor, Collie, Orton, Fochabers ; second, A. Munro, Ord, Invergordon ; third and fourlh, J. Lawrence. Mare (in foal) foaled before 1st January, 1871. — First prize, R. Murdoch, Hallside, Newton, Cambuslang; second, A. K. Leitch, Inchsteeley, F'orres; third, A. Montgomery, Boreland, Castle Douglas ; fourth, J. Hendrie, Castle Heather, Inverness. Fillies foaled after 1st January, 1871. — first prize, A. Buchanan, Garscadden Mains, New Kilpatrick ; second, f. Beattie, Dunnydeer, Insch ; third, E. Baillie of Doch"onr, Inverness ; fourth, A. Munro. Fillies, foaled after 1st January, 1873. — First prize, W. Ilardie, Borrowstoun Mains, Linlithgow ; second, Earl of Straihmore; third. J. R. Mitchell, Drynie, Inverness ; fourth, P. Beattie. Fillies, foaled after January. 1873. — First prize, II. D. Adarason, Dalquarharn, Alford ; second, Earl of Strathmore ; third, D. G. Forbes of Milburn, Inverness. Draught gelilings, foaled after Isf Janu ) proposed that the motion sliould he adopted, remarking that at present members of Parliapient, in speaking of the Chamber, were apt not by any means to magnify their body, while, on the other hand, politicians who iiad an end to serve might, on the occasion of a vote being given by a small number of the members, take hold of the opinion of such a section of the Chamber and represent it as being very infiuential. Mr. Dingwall (Ramovnie) seconded the motion, which on being put to the meeting was unanimously adopted. There was laid on the table a report on the action taken by the Chamber in connection with the Land Tenancy Laws. The principal part of this report was occupied with a long state- ment of the opinions of the committee appointed to examine and report upon the form of leases issued by Sir Patrick Murray, of Ochterlyre, in which certain provisions as to un- exhausted improvements are made. The chief of these are : The tenant, at the natural expiry or earlier termination of t'le lease, shall be entitled to compensation from the landlord for unexhausted extraneous manure brought to I he farm, pur- chased and paid for by the tenant, according to the undernoted scales, the actual purchase of such manure being proved by duly-authenticated vouchers, and its application by the solemn declaration of the tenaat, corroborated by such further evidence as the arbiters may see fit to require ; and during the last three years of a lease, the tenant shall be bound to pro- duce, for the inspection of the landlord or his factor, at each terra of Whitsunday and Martinmas, if required, the vendor's account for all manures and feeding-stuBs supplied to the t nant during the previous six monhts, and he sliall also point oat the ground to which the manure has been applied, as a c mdition of receiving compensation for the same. Allowance for Lime. — Lime applied to arable land shall b; held to last for ten years; applied to permanent pasture on grazing farms for twelve years. Proportion of the Original Value held to he exhausted in each Year, allowance to he made accordingly. On Arable Land. On Permanent Pasture. Fifty- fifths. Fifty-fifths Ii 1st year .. ... 10 In 6th year ... ... 5 „ 2nd „ .. ... 9 „ 7th „ ... ... 4 „ 3rd „ .. ... 8 „ 8th „ ... ... 3 » *th „ .. ... 7 „ 9th „ ... ... 2 » 5th „ .. ... 6 »10th ... 1 Seventy -eigh ths. Seventy-eighths. In 1st year \l In 7th year ... 6 „ 2nd „ 11 „ 8th „ ... 5 „ 3rd „ 10 „ 9th „ ... 4 „ 4th „ 9 „ 10th „ ... 8 „ 5tli „ 8 „ nth „ ... 2 „ 6th „ 7 „ 12th „ ... 1 Allowance for Manures. — Ilorse, cow, and town ma- nure, guano, bones, and coprolites shall be held to last for four years. Rate of Exhaustion. Tenths. Tenths. In 1st year ... ... 4 In 3rd year ... .. 2 „ 2nd „ ... ... 3 „ 4th „ ... ... 1 Allowance for Oil-cake Feeding. — For oil-cake, or any similar substance of equal raauurial value, purchased by tlie tenant, and used in feeding sheep or cattle on the farm, one-sixth part of the entire cost of all the material used during the last three years of the leaje will be allowed, except grain in any shape, for which no allowance will be made. These rates of compensation for unexhausted manures are not to include the cost of the^carriages and laying on performed by the tenant, for which no allowance will be made. Compensation for Carriages driven by the Tenant, on leaving before the Natural Termination of the Lease. — In the event of the tenant ceasing to occupy the farm before the natural termination|of the lease, he shall have right to compensation from the landlord for the value of any carriages of materials for the permanent improvement of the farm performed by the tenant, under the provisions of the lease, or with the written consent of the landlord. The amount of compensation to be in proportion to the number of years of the lease unex- pired at the date of the tenant's removal from the farm ; but under no circumstances shall the amount for value of car- riages, at the tune of the performances thereof, be estimated by the arbiters at more than 14 per cent, on the amount paid by the landlord for these permanent improvements at the time of their execution. Buildings or Fences Erected by Tenant at his own Cost. — If the tenant shall, at his own cost, erect any buildings or fences on the farm, the landlord shall be entitled, if so disposed, to take such erections at valuation of arbiters, or to decline taking them, and in the latter case the tenant shall be obliged to make them over to the incoming tenant, or to remove them, on condition that he restores the ground, or the other buildings to which they are attached, to their original condition. Landlord's Hypothec. — The landlord reuouaces all pre- ferable rights as against other creditors of the tenant conferred upon him by the law of hypothec. Mr. GoODLET writes : 1 hope the directors will not commit themselves to any fixed rule or scheme of compensation for improvement, such as that adopted by Sir Patrick Murray, or any improved scheme that may be devised. I believe no rule can be laid down that will do justice in all cases, and I think it would be a great mistake iu us to commit ourselves to St. Patrick's, or any other scheme of the kind. We cannot, I believe, do better than adhere to the resolution the Chamber has already come to, in which the principle on which com- pensation ought to be allowed is clearly defined, the compen- sation in every case being to be determined by arbitration. Mr. William Smith, West Drums, Brechin, writes : I am of opinion that we ought to stand fast to the general principle of being paid for " whatever is proved to add to the letting value of the subject." I think if this were made the ground- workof thisTenant-Rigbt agitation, it would much simplify the whole affair, and would carry justice and equity along with it. Mr. George Hope, of Borlands, writes : I have made several careful experiments in growing crops during a rotation of four years, with Peruvian guano, Ichabce guano, bones, fresh and decomposed, and other manures, testing them with farm- yard manure, and I found Peruvian and Ichaboe guano equally lasting with farmyard manure, and that a hundred- weight of guano was about equal iu manurial value to three THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 247 tons of farmyard manure. The crops, after the fresh bone dust or meal, were inferior to the others during the first two years, but rather superior to them in tlie last two years of the rotation. The weight of the bones applied was a half more than of guano. Doubtless, on diifereut qualities of soil, different results miglit be obtained, but this is not a matter we require to settle, as it would be absurd to propose inserting in an Act of Parliament tlie value of manures and the period they are supposed to last. Our duty is plainly to demand that all improvements effected by tenants, wliich|are "suitable to the farm, and add to its letting value," should be paid for by tlie landlord or incoming tenant, as valued by arbiters. Tlie im- mense superiority of crops grown on land in really high condi- tion is universally admitted, but then this conilition can only be obtained by a large expense, during a long course of years, while, under the present tenancy laws, there is a strong proba- bility of the tenant being called on to pay additional rent for his own outlay. Mr. Scot-Skirving : I think Sir P. Murray ought to be thanked by the Chamber for his disinterested attempt to meet the expressed wishes of the Chamber. Mr. Goodiet, taking his observations as a whole, seems to tl.ink Sir P. INIurray has not goue far enough. I venture to think, on the contrary, be has gone much too far. I think twenty-one years would be a better duration for a lease than nineteen, and that it might be held as giving a larger and indeed sufficient compensation to the tenant for manurial benefits, except such as are brought to the farm during the last rotation. These I would have sus- tained by proper vouchers, and the unexhausted value proved by arbitration. Both the sliding scale of Sir P. Murray and the annuity of Mr. Goodiet I would reject as too complex. John Clay (Kerchesters, Kelso) : The agriculturists of Scotland are much indebted to our President and Mr. Goodiet for the manner in which these gentlemen have brought up this most important question. Security of capital and payment of tenants' improvements is a question of vital importance, not only to the tenantry, but to the landlord and to the nation, as it is the best mode of securing the fertility of the soil, and the productive powers of the land being kept up for this fast- growing age. Sir Patrick Murray is far in advance of most landlords. In my opinion, however, some of his compensation clauses, meant to be equitable, will be found unworkable in practice. What we, as a Chamber, have urged is, to have the principles of compensation admitted as just between landlord and tenant, and beneficial to the nation ; and Sir Patrick deserves our thanks for the progress he has made in that direction. Soils and climates differ so much that it would be difficult, and 1 think unwise, to attempt laying down a scale for the whole country. But there are in every district many practical men, whose experience in their trade makes them expert in fixing, in any year of a rotation, what values of draining, liming, cakes and manures of all kinds remain in the land unexhausted ; and valuations may, with perfect safety, be left w.th them — with this direction, that they will allow only for " what has proved to have added letting value to the farm." It was the opinion of the following gentlemen, given in evidence in the Ecbline case, recently decided, that a fully manured green crop, grown and removed, would exhaust manures applied to it as under : George Thomson, Pursuer. — One-third of common farmyard manure would be exhausted ; ^ of guano exhausted ; f of potato manure exhausted. Professor Wilson. — I have seen Sir Patrick Murray's model conditions, and I see no reason to object to them. Wm. Smith, West Drums. — Estimated the exhaustion at about ^ of substantial manure, and f of the artificial. John Clay, Kerchesters, Kelso. — One-half farmyard manure exhausted in the crop. The amount of guano depends on quality. If high-class ammoniacal there would iiot be much left. I would put it below ^, perhaps 1-. Of bones, ^ would be left ; potato manure about J left. James Stenhouse, South Gyle, Corstorphine. — One-third of farmyard manure exhausted io crop ; ^ of guano, but it depends on kind of guano ; § potato manure. James Brash, Hallyards, Kirkliston. — About J farmyard manure exhausted ; guano and bones a little more. My calculation ^ of whole exhausted. Charles Rintoul, Easter Craigie and Kingston. — Farmyard manure, ^ exhausted ; guano, f exhausted, and the same in the case of artificial manures, except bone?, which are more lasting. The PuESiDENT, Mr. M'Neel Caird, sums up in these terms': It appears to me, as the geneial results of the discussion, that differences of climate, soil, condition, and treatment, and the varying qualities of manures, and of the quantities applied, make such differences in the rates of exhaustion of fertilisers, that no fixed rules of proportion can with safety be adopted. But these differences are quite cognisable by experienced men in each particular case. Qualified valuers or arbitrators, checking the vouched expenditure by their practical knowledge, and by their personal observation of the results ou the parti- cular farm, with the aid of such inquiry as they can easily make (especially on the spot), will be able to arrive at conclu- sions fair to the outgoing tenant, without injustice to his successor. And this leads me to remark, that in practice these ciiimpensations will iu general not be paid by the landlord, but wil be ascertained and settled between the outgoing and the incoming tenant. The landlord can always, and will usually, make stipulations to that effect in letting his farm to a new tenant, unless lie sees that he can get a better rent by paying the compensation himself. The measure of compensation ought never to exceed the letting value added to the farm by the tenant's improvements as at the date of his removal, taking into account all deteriorations which can be brought against him. The unstinted expenditure in manures, which a just system of compensation will encourage the tenant to make, and to continue till the close of his occupation, will be a new security to the landlord (of which he cannot be deprived) for payment of the rent, and fulfilment of the tenant's obligations. It is of high public policy that a state of the law should be amended, which, by causing insecurity, hinders the full use of capital to increase the productiveness of the soil. To amend that state of the law in a wise spirit with due consideration of all the interests involved, will result in a vast enlargement of growth, especially of food, and, by consequence, will add immensely to the annual income and wealth of the country, to the fund for the employment of labour to the prosperity of manufactures and commerce, to the comfort and contentment of the people, and thus to the se- curity of property, and the general welfare of the nation. Mr. Dunn moved that a vote of thanks should be accorded to Sir Patrick Murray for the action which he had taken, there being, he remarked, a feeling general throughout the county that Sir Patrick deserved all the credit that could possibly be given him. This motion was seconded by Mr. Anderson and unanimously agreed to. The Secretary explained that the Marquis of Huntly's Agricultural Tenants Improvement Bill had uot been before the directors, as they had had no opportunity of meeting since it had been introduced into Parliament, lie had no doubt, how- ever, that it had come under the notice of all the members of the Chamber through being published in the newspapers. The bill had not succeeded in getting through Parliament this year, but he believed that it was to form the basis of a mea- sure to be introduced next session if the proposals contained in it met with any encouragement. The Chairman remarked that he agreed with what had been said by the noble Marquis in moving the second reading of his bill iu the House of Lords. " This hill," his Lordship had said, "may not attain that object (the affording of security for capital invested or improvements made), but at all events I may claim that it is an attempt to settle in a practical way a question which on all sides is acknowledged to be surrounded by great difficulties and complications." lie (the Chairman) thought that at any rate the meeting should express thanks to the Marquis of Huntly for his endeavour to bring about a solution of the question dealt with, althougli he for one was not prepared to express very strongly his opinions as to the merits or demerits of the bill. Mr. Ballingall (Dunborg) said that his Lordship's bill was certainly a step in the right direction — an attempted solution of a question which the Chamber of Agriculture liad a great interest in, and he therefore moved, in accordauce with the Chairman's suggestion, that they should ins, met the Secretary to convey the thanks of the meeting to the Marquis of Huntly, without committing themselves to the practical details of the bill. Mr. NicOLL (Littleton, Kirriemuir) seconded the motion, Mr. Smith (Balzeordie) was of opinion that the noble Marquis had introduced his bill into the House of Lords this session in order that tenant-farmers throughout Scotland might express their opinion on it before Parliament met again 248 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. next year. In Ihese circumstances it seemed a mistake simply to move a vote of thanks to his lordship. There was one part of the bill which he (Mr. Smith) thought the Chamber might express an opinion on at once — namely, that which took the management of the land out of the hands of the owners and put it into the hands of the Enclosure Commissiooers. He thought that any proposal of that kind was a great mistake, and the Chamber should therefore, in his opinion, come to a resolution to that effect as soon as possible. The Chairman said he did not suppose that the directors would take any notice of the bill before the next meeting of Parliament. Mr. Sjiitu said he was inclined to move that so far as taking the land out of the hands of the owners was concerned, the bill had not tlie support of the meeting. The Prime Minister had said that Government was giving attention to the question, and in all likelihood there would be a Government bill intro- duced next year. He was of opinion tliat there was a great probability of a moderate measure being carried, if farmers did not insist upon the condition to which he objected — namely, the taking of the land out of the hands of landlords and putting it into the hands of the Enclosure Commissioners, which was surely as great an interference with freedom of contract as anything could well be. Mr. Gard:IEll',S :JAGAZiNE. SHEEP SALES AND LETTINGS. MR. BUSIIBY'S SOUrilDOWNS.— The annual sale and letting took place at West Preston Manor, near Ang- mering Station. Tlie sale comprised 18 rams for sale and hire; 10 ram lambs and 115 ewe and wether lambs, and 100 breeding ewes for sale. Sixty wether lambs sold from 30s. to 48s. each ; the ewe lambs averaged 31s. ; breeding ewes ranged from 38s. to 6 Is. Rams let and sold from five guineas to 16^ guineas, and ram hi'nbs sold from five guineas to O.j gs. MR. BENNE ITS HA.MPS11IRES. — Messrs. Ewer and Winstanley sold and let by auction, at the Market House-yard, Salisbury, 70 ram lambs and 10 rams, the pro- perty of Mr. W. Bennett, of Chilmark. The first four lots were let lor a month from any date, and the prices realised were as follow : Mr. Brown, Ulfcott, 10 guineas ; Mr. White, lOj gs. ; Mr. White, 19 gs. ; Mr. Coombes, 10 guineas. The next seven lots were let lor a month from the 6th ot Septem- ber, at the following prices : Mr. John Read, 39 guineas ; Mr. Charles Waters, 26 guineas; Mr. Jolin Read, 10 guineas; Mr. Parsons ( WadJou), 10 guineas ; j\lr. J. Carpenter, 10| gui- neas ; Elr. A. 13udd, 26 guineas ; Mr. Kinsman, Cranbury Park, Winchester, 10 guineas — the average being £18 2s. lid. per head. MR. IIANDY'S COTSWOLDS.— This was the first sale, Mr. ViUar, of Cheltenham, being the auctioneer. There was a large attendance, and about 50 animals were sold at an average of £7 13s. MR. L.\NE'S COTSWOLDS AT BROABFIELD.— Mr. Acock, of the firm ot Acock and Hanks, was tlie auctioneer. Two 3.shear sheep and three shearlings were let, the highest price being given by Mr. Brown, of Marhara, Norfolk, ■!•') gs. 47 were sold, the highest figure being 66 gs., which was given by Mr. Coleman, of New Zealand. The average of the lot was £20 Os. 4J., and the uet proceeds of the sale amounted to £1,135 Is. MR. R. GARNE'S COTSWOLDS, AT ALDSWORTH. — Mr. Acock officiated as auctioneer, and let 2 shearlings, the liigliest priced one to Mr. G. Hewer, Leygore, for 46 gs. ; 51 pissed the hammer, at the high average of £22 Is. 91. Mr. Brown, of Marham Hall, Norfolk, gave tlie highest figure, 78 gs. The total amount realised was £1,170 15s. THE TROY RAMS.— 48 animals were olTercd for competi- tion ; but owing to the long continuance of drought and entire failure of the root crops in the ]Midland Counties, they did not realise extraordinary figures. For several of the animals a sharp competition ensued, resulting in the average of £10 Is. 6d. OXFORD RAM SALES.— The first of these annual gatherings was inaugurated in Sniitli's Close, when there was an extraordinarily full attendance of flockraasters, breeders, and dealers. The following are tlie particulars of the sales. — By Messrs. Paxton and Castle : The first lot consisted of 24 shearling Cotswolds, tlie property of the Exe- cutors of the late Mr. R. Lord, of Stanton llarcourl ; the liighest price realised was 111 gs., the average being £7 Is. Od. 11 Cotswold ram lambs, bred by and the property of Mr. II. GiUett, of Southleigh ; the highest price reilised was £6, and the lot averaged £4 5s. 8 Cotswold shearling rams, bred by Mr. C. Gillett, of Lower 11 addon; average £5 15s. 6d. Cotswold sliearling rams, bred by Mr. S. Smith, of Soraerton ; average £9 9s. The Cotswold shearling rams drafted from tlie flock of Mr. John AVorley, of Brize-Norton ; the average was £7, and the highest ])rice was 9 gs. 15 Oxfordshire Down ram lambs, bred by Mr. C. Badeock, of Radley. The highest price reached for these was £7 10s. ; average £4 7s. — By Messrs. Acock and Hanks : 15 Cotswold ra.n lambs, the jiroperty of Mrs. Smith, of Shilton, near Burford, averaged £4 16s. 6d.— By Messrs. Franklin and Gale : 25 Cotswold ram lambs, tlie properly of BIr. Thomas Akers, of Burtou Abbots, realised from 3i to 7^ gs. Mil. HUGH AYLIMER'S LONGWOOLS AT WEST DEREHAM— Mr. Simpson ofi'ered the 100 ram lambs. These realised a total sum of £575 5s., and averaged £5 15s. each. The highest price given for a ram lamb was £10, the lowest £4 10s. The SO shearlings realised £927 4s., an ave- rage of £11 lis. 9J. The highest price given for a sliearling was £42, the lowest ±7 17s. 6d. The 10 two-shear sheep made £92 18s. 6d., an average of £d 6s. each. The highest price given for one of these sheep was £15 15s., the lowest £7 7s. The total iroceeds of the letting were £1,597 7s. 6d. MR. WALKER'S COTSWOLDS— There was a larg: attendance, including the leading tnp breeders of tlie neighbourhood, and the sheep were considered to be the bes: offered this season. Mr. Acock, of the firm of Acock anl Hanks, oU'ered the first sheep, which was knocked down a: £24 3s. Shee|) alter sheep was brought forward and speedily disposed of, till No. 20 was brought into tlie ring, when it was plain theie was something more than usual in that number. The biddings quickly rose from £20 to 70 guineas, when there was a halt for a few seconds. From this sum the biddings rose to 75 guineas, aad then to 100 guineas. Finally this sheep was knocked down at 102 guineas, to go to Canada. The other twenty were quickly disposed of. The forty, which averaged £21 4s. yd. each, were all disposed of in about an hour. MR. RIGG'S HAMPSHIRE DOWNS.— One hundred and twenty ewes were sold at Wrotham-hill Park. One pen made £4 per head, and several lots went into Lancashire. They averaged 5Ss. For the rams there was but a poor trade. A few weie let at 8g3. ; one of the shearlings went at lOgs. Those disposed of averaged £6 lOs. 9d. A number of store cattle were sold at moderate prices. THE WOOLDING HAMPSHIRES.— At this sale, by Messrs. Water.s, Son, and Ravvlence, the prices ranged at 12| gs. and lOj gs., two at 10 gs., 9^ gs., and 9 gs., several at 8^ gs., 8 gs., 71 gs., 7 gs., and 6 gs., down to (for young lambs) 4^ gs. and 4 gs., and two at 3 gs., the average of the whole being li gs. THE BULBRIDGE HAMPSHIRE EWES. -Messrs. J. and E. Raw fence have held tiieir second and last sale at Bulbridge, when they offered the whole of their flocks of Hampshire Down ewes, consisting of about 1,090 ewes and ewe lambs. The auctioneers were Messrs. Ewer and Winstanley. The sheep were in lots of ten each (except where otherwise expressed), and the sale commenced with the two-tooth ewes, when the/oUowin^ purchases were made : Mr. Simmouds (agent to Mr. Walter, Bearwood), £bo ; Mr. Dibben, Bishopstone, £72 10s., and £77 lOs. ; Mr Newton, Dagdean (five), £57 15s. ; Mr. Charles Waters, £02 IDs. ; Mr. Smith, of Stapleford {Hxe), £70 17s. 6d. ; Mr. A. Morrison, Fonthill, £50, and i\ve, £42 10s.; Mr. Pain, of Frilsham, Berks, £52 lOs. and £42. The following were among the purchasers of the four-tooth ewes : Mr. Pain, £57 10s. ; Mrs. Brice, Wolfhall, £70 ; Mr. Newton (five), £49 173. 6d. ; Mr. Uoldsworth (steward of the Earl of Pembroke), [£47 ; Mr. Taylor, £45 and £55 ; Mr. Simmonds, two lots at £40 each ; Mr. Twitchen, from Basingstoke (five), £30 ; Mr. Lambert, of Abingdon, £40 ; Mr. Moore, of Littlecott, £44 ; and Mr. Homer, Athelhampton, £49. Amongst the purchasers of the six-tooth ewes were — Mr. Pain, £57 10s. ; Mr. Morrison, £57 10s. ; Mr. R. Brine, of Gussage (five), £31 5s. ; Mr. Taylor, £15 ; Mr. Homer, £42 ; Mr. Simmonds, £43 ; Mr. Buxton, of Ware, £40 ; Mr. Godwin, of East Stour, £10- The following were the pur- chasers of the full-mouthed ewes : Mr. Homer, £31 10s. and £35 , Mr. Coles, Warminster, £41 ; Mr. Simmonds, £36 and £33 ; Mr. Brine, Gu.ssage, £32 10s., and five at £21 5s. Mr. Webb, of Newbury, £31, £31 10s., and £32 10s. Among the purchasers of the Chilver lambs were Mr. Morrison, a lot at £170; Mr. Taylor, £80 ; Mr. Buxton, ^£33 10s. Mr. Holdsworth, £34, The 1,095 ewes and ewe lambs realised £4,800. The averages were : Two-tooth, £5 8s. lOd. each ; four-tooth, £1 lis. 5d. ; six-tooth, £4 15s. lid.; full- mouthed, £3 6s. lOd. ; Chilver lambs, £3 19j. 6d. ; the total average per bead being £4 8s. 6d. MR. PARKER'S HAMPSHIRES. — Messrs. Downs and Awbery have disposed of the Lashara Flock, late the property of Mr. J. Parker, deceased. Twenty-three ram lambs were first disposed of, and produced £414 4s. 6d., an average of over £18, Lot 3 being secured by Messrs. R. and J. Russell, of Horton, Kerby, Keut, at 50 gs. Lot 6 made 40 gs. Mr. A. Twitchen, North Oakley, purchased Lot 9 at 22 gs., Mr. F. Budd Lot 12 at 40 gs., Mr. Pearce Brown Lot 15 at 26 guineas, Messrs. Russell Lot 30 at 36 gs. The average price of the whole flock vi'as £!• 7s. 6d. per head. MR. LUNN'S RAMS.— ilessrs. Waters, Son, and Lawrence at Aiidover Ttation, conducted the sale of rams belonging to Mr. Lunn, of Woolding F'arm, AVhitchurch, Hants. The prices ranged at 12|^gs., lO^ gs., two at lOgs., 9|^ gs., 9 gs., several at 8|gs., and 8gs., 7ig8,. 7gs., 6gs., ;down to (for 260 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. young Iambs) 42gs. and 4gs. auJ two at 3gs., the average of tlie whole being 6g.s. MR. CHARLES WATERS' UAMPSHIRES.— The sale of 7G ram lambs, took place at the Market House, Salisbury, being conducted by Messrs. Waters, Son, and Rawlence. The prices obtained were for letting 23 gui- neas, 10|^ guineas, 7 guineas, and 6 guineas ; and for lambs sold 14j guineas, 1'2 guineas, llj guineas, lO^ guineas, 9-o gui- neas, 9 guineas, 8j guineas, 8 guineas, 7 guineas, down to 5 guineas, the average being £8 eacli. Eighteen of the younger lambs were passed without a bid. Jlr. Coles, of Middletou Farm, Warminster, hired No. 3 for one month from 1st September for 23 guineas. 10 ram lambs, the property of Sir. G. Read, of Charford; the highest brought y^- guineas. Tiie average was £5 10s. MR. NEWTON'S HAMPSHIRES. — At Dogdean, Messrs. Waters, Sou, and Rawlence offered about 100 ram lambs and 10 rams, tl\e property of Mr. William Newton. The ssile commenced with the letting of 13 ram lambs, No. 4 being let to Mr. Dibben at 25 gs. ; No. 8, to Mr. E. rinckney (Berwick), at 23 gs. ; No. 5, to Mr. William Eloyer (Ridge), at li gs., who also hired No. 7, at 9 gs. ; and No. 3, to Mr. Carpenter, at 11 gs. The selling lambs pro- duced considerable competition, the averaee of the first 40 being £11 lis. 3d. The principal purchasers were Mr. E. Pinckney, who secured No. 2G at 20 gs.. No. 3(3 at 13 gs., and No. 83 at 15 gs. ; Mr. Smith (Stapleford), No. 15 at 15 gs., and No. 17 at 15| gs. ; Mr. C. Friend (Gussage), No. 13 at 18 gs. ; Mr. F. G. Dalgety, No. 20 at 16 gs. ; Mr. II. Friend, No. 39 at 15 gs., No. 40 at 14.1- gg.. No. 49 at 9i- gs., and No. 52 at 9 gs. ; Mr. R. Friend, No. 22 at 13^ gs.. No. 12 at 9 gs., &c. ; Mr. Hayter (Woodgates), No. 33 at 13 gs., No. 50 at 11 gs., and No. 72 at 9| gs. ; Mr. Fleetwood (Coorabe), No. 27 at 13 gs.; Mr. Pinniger (Rock- bourne), No. 25 at 114- gs.. No. 53, at 11 gs., Nos. 30, 32, and 34, at 10^ gs. eacli, No. 45 at 9^ gs., and Nos. 46 and 48 at 9 gs. each ; Mr. Warner (Liss, Petersfleld), No. 38 at 11 gs.. No. 10 at lOI gs.. No. 14 at 9 gs., and No. 56 at gs. The average of the whole was i'99 7s. lOd. MR. PREECE'S SHROPSHIRE SALES AT SHREWSBURY. — The numerous purchasers had some 150 flocks to select from. As might have been expected, Lord Chesham obtained the highest prices, and the {highest average ever yet reached for Shropshire rams. A shearling ram, sire, grandson of Duke of Manchester, let for 85 gs. ; and anotlier let for 25 gs. A two-shear ram, sire, son of JlauseU's No. 8, sold for 115 gs. ; a shearling sold for 105 gs., one at 70 gs., and one at G5 gs. Tlie 21 brought in a total of 728 gs., giving an average of nearly 35 gs. per head. Mr. Crane, of Shrawardine, let a two-shear ram, Caligula, for 46 gs., and Mr. J. Evans, Uffington, let a shearling ram, by Grand Duke, sire of dam Hardliues, for 85 gs. Mr. T. Horley, The Fosse, Leamington ; Mr. G. Allen, Kuightley Hall ; and Mr. W. Marson, Butter- liill, also sold several rams at satsfactory prices. The follow- ing were among the prices obtained for ewes : Mr. Crane's lot from 60s. to SOs. ; Mr. John Evans, 50s. to 200s. each ; Lord Chesham's, 6O3. to 80s. ; Mr. J. W. Minton, 65s. to 95s. ; Rev. C.P.Peters, 70s.; Mr. R.Edwards, 130s. Mr. G. lIorton,G5s. to 85s.; Mr. Bowen Jones, GOs. to 130s.; Mr. R. Jones, 50s. to 105s. ; Captain Wintjfleld, GOs. to 72s. Gd. ; Messrs. J. and ' G. Crane, GOs. ; Mr. W. Andrews, GOs. ; Mr. II. Lee, G5s. ; i Mr. Peter Everal, GOs.; Mr. Frank, 55s. to 1053.; Mr. A. Mansell, 50s. to GOs. ; Mr. W. G. Preece, 55s. to G53. ; Mr. W. Holder, 48s. to GOs. ; Mr. G. T. Forester, 45s. to GOs. Besides the above there was a large supply of well-bred ewes sent by numerous well-known breeders. MESSRS. LYTHALL AND CLARK'S SHROPSHIllES IN BINGLEY HALL.— The trade ruled slow, many animals passed through the ring unsold, and other breeders iiad to submit to a fall from last year of about 30 to 50 per cent. The thirty rams exhibited by Mr. Joseph Pulley, of Lower Eaton, Hereford, attracted most attention ; and one, the commended sheep at Bedford, was bought by Mr. Crawfurd for 34 gs. Mr. William Baker, of Staffordshire, secured the next sheep, a shearling, at 36 gs. Others made 30, 31, and 35 gs. each, the average of the thirty sheep, all shearlings, being a trifle under 15 gs., which, however, is little more than lialf the sum realised by the same breeder last year. Mr. Thos. Nock, of Shiffnal, showed ten shearlings and one two- sliear; two of the former were let, and the nine sold averaged £13, the highe.st price being made of No. 3, who was bought for Mrs. Henry Smith, of Sutton Maddock, for 28 gs. Mr. U. S. Sheldon, of Brailes House, Shepston-on-Stour, showed nine sheep, which realised a trifle under 11 gs. Mr. E. Lythall, of Radford-hall, Ltamingtou, showed thirl?eii yearlings ; the highest figure was 25 gs., and the average £11 4s. Gd. Lord Sudely's rams made about £8, and Lord Wenloek's, from "Yorkshire, £7 5s., about half the price realised last year. There are about 500 ewes in tlie cata- logue, not all present ; purchasers were found for most if not all, but the drop was even greater than in the raras. Mr. Pulley's shearling ewes commanded the best average, making 68s. a head. TVn lots of Show shearlings, belonging to Mr, Rock and Mr. Sheldon, made an average of 71 gs. per head, prices of the remainder ranging from 42s. to 80s. a-head. MR. COXON'S SUROPSHIRES.— Mr. W. G.^ Preecu conducted the annual sale and letting at Freeford, of Mr. Coxon's selection of Shropshire sheep, which this year consisted of 3G rams and 100 ewes, the whole of which very successfully realised remarkably good prices, taking into consideration the want of keep, shortness of capital, and the duhiess of trade. The ram Confidence was first put into the ring and offered to let. This sheep won third prize at Hull R.A.S.E. last year as a shearling. Twelve of his ewe lambs were run into the ring with him. After a very spirited competition between the most celebrated breeders of Shrop- shires, he was knocked down to Mr. Cartwright, Burton- on-Trent, at the extraordinary sum of 200 guineas for the season. If Confidence had been offered for sale there is no knowing wliat price he would have made, and 500 guineas we heard had been offered last spring for him, but refused. Champion, winner of the first prize at Manchester, was let to Mr. C. W. Hamilton, Ireland, at 115 gs.; Capitalist (a two-shear) sold to Mr. R. H. Masfen, at 57 gs. ; Consol ition (a two-shear), 55 gs., to Mr. W. H. Clare ; 3, a shearling, 63 gs., to Mr. C. Stubbs. The Hon. Lord Falmouth purchassed Safeguard, 16, at 53 gs., and No. 4 at 23 gs. IMr. German purchased two rams at 42 gs. and 31 gs. each. Lot 5, 32 gs., Mr. Farmer, of Cheadle ; lots 17 and 18 went to Mr. Pilgrim at 21 and 23 gs. Lord Bateraan, Mr. VVinterton, Mr. C. R. Keeling, Mr. T. J. Mansell, Mr. Barnes, Mr. Booth, Mr. Kinghoru, for the Rev. W. Inge, and other well-known breeders obtained specimens from this renowned flock at from 12 to 40 gs. each. The average is about 31 guineas. The ewes were sold for the season at prices ranging from 8 to 60 gs., amongst the buyers being Messrs. Holland, Firmstone, Cartwright, Woodall, Bagffalay, F'owler, Meakiu, Salt, Bury, and Ball. MR. R. H. MASFEN'S SUROPSHIRES— This sale took place at Peudcford, Mr. Preece oiliciatiug. Only two rams were let, Roman for 53 gs., and The General for 8 gs. Of the' fifty-five which were sold. The Admiral brought the highest figure, namely, 81 gs. The next best prices were 45 gs. for Wildboy, 45 jrs. for Captain, 30 gs. for Lord Rock- ingham, and 25 gs. for Nobleman. Several others brought 20 gs. each. 130 ewes were brought forward in lots of five, and some rather spirited competition ensued. The best pen made 165s. each ewe ; others 85s., 80s., and 70s. each. MRS. H. SMITH'S SHROPSHIRES.— Mrs. H. Smith, of Sutton Maddock, held her annual sale of Shrop- shire raras and ewes, when Messrs. Lythall and Clarke brought forty rams and seventy-five ewes to the hammer. The rams realised the good average of 13 gs. each, the prices ranging fromSG gs. downwards, and the ewes fetch- ing from lOjto 4 gs. each, and realising an average of 4| gs, CIRENCESTER RAM FAIR.— Mr. Barton sent 23 rams, which made the average tf £16 3s. The highest prices ranged from 24 gs. to 49 gs. Last year Mr. Barton made an average of £10 6s. for 31 sheep. 18 rams from the flock of Mr. E. Fowler, of Aston F'arm, went at an average of £8 I83. ; being £6 17s. less than last year, when the number was 30' 7 sheep of Mr. Thomas Clarke's, of F'rarapton Mansell, made an average of £7 each ; last year's average was £9 9s. Mr. J. Villar sold the follow- ing : 27 Cotswold raras from the flock of Mr. Thomas Porter, Bauuton, at an average of £7 10s. 9d.,the highest price being 15 gs. Mr. Porter's average last year was £10 15s. 6d. for 30 sheep. Mr. Villar next sold 13 Cotswolds from Mr. H. Cole, Ashbrook, at an average of £8 15s. 6d., the highest lot realising 16 gs. Last year's average was £12 2s. 3jd. for 29 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. ■61 slicep. Mr. Villur then offerpd ?5 Oxfordshire Down rams from tlie flock of Mr. Cliarles llobbs, of Moysey Hampton, at an average of £11 IGs. ; one of the lots realised 21 gs. Messrs. Acock and llauks sold 36 Cotswold rams, the property of Mr. C. Barton, Fifield, realising an average of £11 12s. Od., one being bought by Mr. Jacobs, of Bury Barns, Burford, for 30 gs. Mr. C. PinncU, of Westwell, and Mr, Game, of Filkins, also bought rams at 22 gs. and 20 gs. respectively. Messrs. Acock and Hanks next offered S rams from the flock of Mr. llnssell Swauwick, of Cirencester, at aaaveragc of £10 lis., tlie highest price being 1-5 gs. 18 rams, bred by Mr. J. Gillett, of Tangley, realised an average of £10 14s. 8d., the liighest price being given by Mr. Clarke, of Frampton Man- sell, 27 gs. 20 rams from Mr. J. Tedley, of Bibury, averaged £9 2s. 8d. (a fe-.v shillings iiigher than last year), two of the number bringing 18 gs. and 17 gs. 12 rams, bred by Mr. Joseph Walker, of Compton Abdale, averaged £9 Is. 12 rams from the flock of Mr. Jacobs, Bury Barns, Burford, realised an average of £9 9s. 17 rams from Messrs. T. and S. Gillett's flock, ol Kilkenny, brought an average of £7 15s., against an average last year of £6 19s. Gd. 10 rams bred by Mr. G. Hewer, of Northleach, averaged £7 Is., little more than half last year's average. There were also offered for sale 20 O.xfordshire Down rams, bred by Mr. Samuel Davis, of Sevenhampton. The 19 sold realised an average of a little over £12 12s., the highest price obtained being 20 gs. This was a slight increase on the average of last year. 40 shear- ling Cotswold rams, bred by and the property of Mr. Henry Howell, offered at Coates, realised an average of £11 3s. 4-d., tlie highest price obtained being 40 gs. Last year's average was £12 12s. Mr. Newton's Hampshire Downs were sold at Ilsley fair by Messrs. Franklin and Gale, of Wallingford ; thers were 73 ram lambs and 1 two-toothed sheep. T'he hightt, priced lamb was knocked down to A. Morrison, Esq., FonthiU Wilts, for 28 gs., Mr. John Kirby, of Moreton, securing another at 27 gs., and the prices of the others ranging from 4| gs. to 16 gs. 72 out of the 74 others being sold at an ave- age of £8 a piece. THE MARHAM COTSWOLD LE'l'TING.— The annual letting of Mr. Thomas Brown's celebrated Norfolk Cotswold rams took place at the Marham Hall Farm, Dowuham Market, under the direction of Salter and Simpson. Tiie 100 rams lambs averaged £6 3s. each; the 80 shearling rams averaged £11 17s. Gd. each ; and the 10 two-shear rams averaged £7 7s. each, the total proceeds of the letting being £1,G50 13s. 2d. Amongst the hirers were Messrs. Kobert Game, Aldsworth, Gloucestershire ; T. H. Coleman, New Zealand ; and Thomas Allen, Markshall. MR. J. GIBLIN'S COTSWOLD AND OXFORD DOWNS.— This sale took place at Little Bardfield. The following is the general result : Cotswolds, 35 shearlings, averaged £8 9s. 8d. ; 2 two-shears, £5 each. Oxford Downs — Eight shearlings averaged £G lOs. 7d. ; 2 two-shears, £5 MR. HALL'S LEICESTER RAMS.— The Scorborough rams were let by auction, at Scarborough, near Beverley. There was a very large attendance of the leading farmers of the neighbourhood, and also many from other coun- ties and from Ireland. The number of sheep offered was ninety, of which fifty-five were shearlings. The average price of the shearlings was £7 15s., and the aged sheep £7 12s. Gd. The total average was £7 13s. Gd. per head. The highest price given for a shearling was £17 10s., and for an aged sheep £15 15s. MR. H. FOOKES'S SOUTHDOWNS.— Mr. T. Euson, of Dorchester, submitted 80 Southdown rams and 150 ewes from the flock of Mr. H. Fookes, of White- church. The sale and letting took place in the fair-field, Blandford, and commenced with the two-tooth rams, of which there were fifty offered, in lots of ten, alternately for sale and letting. The highest of the first 10 was let for 16 guineas to Mr. John Scutt, of Winforth, near Dorchester ; lots 13 and 17 were bought by Mr. Hutchings, of Chard, at 15 guineas each. Tlie third ten, from 21 to 30, were a very fine lot of sheep. Lot 21 was let at 21 guineas ; 22 was let to Lord Walsiug- ham at 55 guineas ; lots 23 and 24 were let for 13 and 10 guineas, and 30 for 20 guineas. The six-tooth rams were sold at 11 guineas and 6 guineas. Colonel Kingscote, of Kingscote, Gloucester, purchased lot 56 at 17i guineas ; and 57, which formed the first prize at Dorchester show last year, was sold to Mr. John Ford, of Rushton, at 18|- guineas. The average of those sold and let at the sale was about 11 guineas per head. Down ewes realized from 47s. to 50s. MESSRS. MANSELL'S SHROrSHlRES.— This sale took place at Ercall Park, near Wellington. About 40 rams and 120 breeding ewes were sold by auction, by Mr. I'reece The average for the rams was about 21 guineas each, and the ewes ranged from 60s. to 93s. each. MR. G. WALLIS' OXFORDSHIRE DOWN RAMS.— Messrs. Paxton and Cattle sold at Old Shifford, Faringdon, 50 shearling rams and 50 ewes, at an average of £14 2s. 8d. This was the first auction sale of sheep held at Shifford. MR. TREADWELL'S OXFORDSHIRE DOWNS.— At Mr. Treadwell's seventeenth annual sale, about 50 Oxfordshire shearling rams, together with a few older sheep, were submitted to competition by Mr. J. A, Muraford, at the Model Farm, Upper Winchendon. There was a numerous attendance of purchasers. In 1871 the average was something over £13 13s., in 1872 it reached upwards of £18, and in 1873 it exceeded £23; this year, however, ov\ing no doubt to the dry season, the average was only £17 Is. 3d. The total proceeds of the sale amounted to £921 3s. The following were the chief sales : Mr. Street, £22 Is. ; Mr. Mather, £21 ;" Mr. W. Scovell, £21; Mr. R. Foster, £21 ; Mr. N. Stilgoe, £21; Mr. P. Bulford, £31 lOs. ; Mr. Taylor, £;22 Is. ; Mr. T\umer, £31 10s. ; Mr. Cooper, £21 ; Mr. Roberts, £21 ; Mr. Wright, £21 ; Mr. King, £22 Is. The WiQchcndon estate, which includes Mr. Treadwell's farm, has just been sold by the Duke of Marl- borough to Baron Ferdinand de Rothschild, the son of Baron Rothschild of Austria, wliose death was recently announced. MRS. BEACH'S SUROPSUiRES. — This annual sale took place at the Hattons, Brewood, Peukridge. The catalogue comprised 31 entries of shearling rams, four older rams and twelve pens of five each, ewes and theaves. The sale, ccnducted by Mr. J. B. Lythall, commenced with the shearling rams ; the first lot submitted being the reserved at Bedford, which fell to Mr. Preece for 50 guineas. Several subsequent lots bordered on that sum, fetching 48 (to let), 40 and 50 gs., until at the eighth lot, which, with the succeeding was also on hire for the season, let for the season at 135 gs. to Mr. Crawford. After this the hammer fell to what may be termed ordinary prices ranging from 25 to as low as 8 gs. for shearlings, while thejiighest prices made for the older rams was 26gs., the shearling rams averaging £25 3s. Cd. each, including three or four let for the season. For I he theaves and young stock ewes there was a deal of competition, but the prices were not comparable with former years, the highest figure in the ewes class being 12 gs. each for a pen of five show theaves. The other lots of theaves nuide from 70s. to 8O3 each, and tlie young stock ewes Irora G7s. 6d. to lOUs. each. OXFORDS AND COTSWOLDS AT OXFORD FAIR.— Messrs. Paxton and Castle sold by auction some Oxfordshire Down stock ewes, from the flock of Mr. J. Jakeraan, Chester- ton Fields, the average being 41s. 6d. ; 30 ewes of this class, the property of Mr. H. Howse, Weston-ou-the-Green, averaged 50s. ; 78 ewes of the same age and breed drafted from the flock of Mr. J. Rowles, Weston-on-tlie-Green, obtained the average of 47s. 6d., including the largest figured pen in the fair, which reached 58s, per head. About 500 sheep were penned, consigned by the Earl of Jersey (Middleton Park), Messrs. W. Rowles (Weston-on-the-Green), Cave (Merton), Waiuc (Blackthorn), G. T. Drake (Bignell House), and other llockmasters in the district. The ram business was ex- cessively slow, but G Oxfordshire Downs from the flock ef Sir Henry W. Dashwood, Bart., Kirtlingfon Park, averaged £7 143. The prices ranged between 5^ gs. to 12 gs., the purchaser of the highest-priced animal at the latter sum was Mr. Brett, Walton, Stoney Stratford. A few shearlings se- lected from the flock of Mr. F. Gillett, Upton Downs Farm, Burford, changed ownership at from 5| gs., averaging £/ 5s. Some shearlings of the same class, the property of Mr. Howe. Weston-on-the- Green, fetched from 4^ gs. to 5J gs. each, S Cotswold shearlings made from 5i gs. to 8 gs., averaging £6 10s. MR. DIBBEN'S UAMPSHIRES. — Messrs. Ewer and Winstanley offered at the Market House Yard, Salisbury, about 100 ram lambs and rams, the property of Mr. E. Dibben, of Bishopstone. The letting of ten ram lambs for a month or lor the season was proceeded with, and the following prices were realised ; 8^ gs., 0 gs., 28 gs., Mr. Taylor , 8 gs., 8 gs,, 9| gs., 9 gs., 9 gs., 21 gs., Mr. W. Bennett ; 8 gs. The ■2&2 'iilhl FAltMEirs :\IAGAZ1NE. following prices were realisrd lor t .e liiiibs nirrred for sale: 7 gs. (three lots), iO gs., Mr. King; 2C gs., Mr. Piuckaey ; 17 gs., Mr. Pearce lirown, liurJerop ; G^gs., 5.j gs , 13^ gs., Mr. Ferris ; 26 gs., Mr. Pearce Brown ; 7 gs., 5.j g?., 6 gs., 7gs., 23.^ gs., Mr. I'earce Browu ; 10.^ gs , Mr. Ferris ; 5^ gs., 6 gs., 6^- gs., li| gs., Mr. Bu.\toa, Essex ; 13 gs., I\Ir. Pearce iironu ; 13 gs., Mr. Pearce Brown ; 9^ gs., Mr. Eerris; 9|^ gs., Mr. Xing; ITj gs., Mr. Parry ; 8> gs., Mr. Piuckuey ; and 6 gs., Mr. Branston. SOUTHUOWiNS. — Messrs. Wyatt and Sou held their second annual sale of Southdown rams at Chichester. The catalogue contained 58 lots, drawn from the flocks of Mr. G. \y. Homer (Dorchester), Mr. A. T. Newman (Westdean), the Earl of Portsmouth, Mr. 11. Upton (tVldwick), Mr. C. Combes (Birdham), and Mr. F. Padwick (Thorney). Filteen of Mr. Homer's slieep sold at prices ranging from £3 to £5 15s. ; the average price being £1 5s. Mr. J. Boys, of Comp- ton, was the principal purchaser. Mr. A. T. Newman's two two-tootbs were let for the season at 11 ^ gs. (to Mr. ¥. Eushby), and at 10^ gs. (to ]Mr. H. E. Sadler). Ol those sold Mr. llabin gave 12 gs. for a two-tooth, and the others fetched 10| gs., lU gs., 8 gs., G gs., and 4 gs. each respectively. The Earl of Portsmoutli's, which included five two-tooths bred i)y Lord Walsinghani, sold at from £1 to £G 15s., the last price being given by Mr. Fifield, who «as buying for Mr. Goater, of Findon. Mr. H. Upton sent nine for sale, the highest price realised being £5 (Mr. Fifield). Five of Mr. Combes' sold at from £2 10s. to £3 7s. Cd. Mr. Padwick only had two in the catalogue — a couple of two-tooths from the late Mr. John Pinui.\'s breed ; and Mr. C. Combes took both, the price being C trs. each. LAMMAS L.VilB SALE AT ST. BOSWELLS.— The annual great sale of lambs, inaugurated several jears ago by the Messrs. Swan, took place again at St. Boswells. There was a large attendance of farmers and dealers, not only from the norihern counties of Scotland, but i'rom various counties of England, and several from Ireland. The sales were an improvement on the recent markets — no doubt occa- sioned by the recent showers and the excellent turnip pros- pect in tiie Border counties. Lambs were selling at prices rather higher than those obtained at St. Boswells Fair, but, in comparison with last year, first-class lambs would be from 6s. to 8s. lower, and second class lambs, whicli sold un- equally, were sold at reduction of from Is. to 10s. a-head. The number disposed of was nearly 30,000. THE MAKKSHALL HAMS.— The annual letting of Mr. Allen's longwools took place at Marshall Farm, when the result of the letting was as follows : There were forty lambs let at an average of £-i 10s. Gd., forty-five shearlings averaged £8 7s. 6d., and five two-shear sheep averaged £5 5s. The liighest price paid for a lamb was £12 10s., for a shearling £22 10s. MR. DAVIES' SHROPSHIRES.-Mr. E. Sunderland sold in the Hereford market some Shropshre rams, belooging to Mr. Davies, of Burlton Court, at prices ranging from 5 gs. to 10 gs. SUFFOLK LAMB SALES.— Mr. Robert Bond held his tiiird Sutton lamb sale at Woodbridge. The number of lambs was considerably in advance of that of either of the preced- ing sales, about 5,500 being brought to the hammer. Amongst those who favoured Mr. Bond with instructions were — Mr. J. S. Clarke's Executors, Eyke ; Messrs. C. Walker, Melton ; W. Toller, Gedgrave ; W. AV. Flat, Wantisden ; J. Smith, Has- keton ; S. Wolton, Butley ; G. Eastaugh, Sudbourne ; D. Nunn, Eyke ; J. Toller, Blaxhall ; \V. 11. Borrett, Tunstall ; Mrs. 13orrett, Framliugham ; Messrs. R. Cooper, Iken Hall; D. Burrows, Dallinghoo ; A. Bendall, Sutton ; A. Smith, Eyke ; R. Welton, Marlesford ; T. Roberts, Aiderton ; H. M. Gobbilt, Capel St. Andrew ; E. T. Uuckett, Sutton Haugh ; A. Talnian, Saxstead ; C. K. Cordy, Trimley ; J. B. Cordy, Felixstowe ; II. Walker, Letheriiigham ; AV. Toller, Ged- grave ; M. Murrell, Earl Sohara ; G. Chaplin, Sudbourne ; H. Clarke, Iken: T.Waller, Sutton Hall; M. Jary, Under- wood Hall; Westby, Newmarket; J. Cracknell, Wickham Market ; R. C. Ablitt, Grundisburg ; C. Capon, Fraralinghara ; Walker, Chillisford. There was a good attendance of buyers, including several gentlemen from a distance. One invested no less than £1,500 in stock. Trade for all descriptions was considered to be satisfactory. The highest price tor black-faced ewe lambs was realised for GO by |Mr. J. M. Green's tups, bred by and the property of Mr. C. K. Cordy ; they brouglit 4fis. eac'n. 100 black-faced sh.earling ewes, consigned by Mr. ,1. Smith, Hasketon. realised 68s. 6d. a- jiiece ; 140 half-bred shearling ewes, from Mr. Walker, Le- theriugham, and bred by Mr. R. Welton, fetched 53s. ; 200 black-laced ewe lambs, from Mr. J. S. Clarke's Executors, averaged 27s. Gd. each, and 320 wether lambs averaged 263.; 200 black-faced shearling ewes, from Mr. Cileb Walker, aver- aged nearly 60s. each. 160 half-bred lambs, from Mr. W. Toller, averaged 21s. Gd. ; and half-bred shearling ewes, from iMr. J. Toller, made from 5Gp. Gd. to 61s. ; 180 half-bred two- shear ewes, from Mr. D. Burrows, fetched from 44s. to 52s. and averaged 47s. ; 100 black-faced ewe lambs, from Mr. Roberts, made from 29j. to 36s. ; 140 half-bred lambs, from Mr. J. B. Cordy, averged 24s. 6d. ; aad 200 from Mr. Mur- rell, realised from 22s. 6d. to 30s. Gd. each. The bulk of the hall-bred lambs were knocked down at from 20s. to 30s. a- head. MR. GERMAN'S ANNUAL SALE OF SHROP- SHIRE SHEEP took place at Measham Fields. The business commenced with the shearling rams. The first fell to the bid of Mr. May, Elford Park, for £31 10s. ; the second to Mr. Berry, for the same sum ; the third to Mr. Price, for £19 19s. ; No. 5, to Mr. F. Gretton, Burton-on-Trent, £37 16?. ; 6, to Mr. Coxon, £17 17s. ; 7, to Mr. Cartwright, £38 17s.; 9, to Mr. T. Tompson, Manor Farm, £25 4s. ; 13, to Mr. Tompson, Wilson, £24 3s.; 17, to Mr. J. Mouse'y, £21 ; 19, Mr. G. F. Brown, Desford, £17 17s.; 21, to Mr. C. Mouslev, £15 15s. ; 24 (to let), Mr. Cartwright, £40 19s. ; 25 (to let), Mr. Coxon, £15 15s.; 26, Mr. J. Ratcliff, £17 17s. ; 27, Hon. F. Strntt, £15 15s.; 28, Mr. Faux, £16 16s. ; £9, Mr. Madan, Elford, £16 16s. ; 31, Mr. Clare, £16 16s. ; 34, Mr. Loift, Bury St. Edmunds, £16 16s. ; who also bought N... 10 at £12 12s., and 32 at £11 lis. ; 38 (to let), Mr. F. Byrd, £26 6s. ; 49, reserved No. R.A.S.E., Bedford, 1874, to Mr. Uavenpoir, on commission, £21 ; 51, Mr. K. Bourne, £25 4s. : 52, Mr. Smith, £16 16s. ; 50, Mrs. Walker, £15 15s. ; others ranged from £6 Gs. to £15 15s. The rams averaged £17 4s. 2d. each. The ewes and theaves ranged from £3 3s. Gd. to £5 7s. Gd. each, and brought an average of £3 12s. 6d. The total amount of the sale, £1,339 lis. MR. MOORE'S HAMPSHIRES.— The second portion, consisting of 30 joung ram lambs, 20 two- teeth and five four- teeth rams, together with 700 ewes and ewe lambs, of the Improved Hampshire breed, was sold by auction by Messrs. Waters, Son, and Rawlence, at Littlecott. The young ram lambs brought 9|, 8|, 7i, 7, and G|, down to 3 gs., averaging ±5 12s. Gd. each, and the two-teeth and four-teeth rams 11, 10, 9, 8j, 8, 7|, 7 gs., &c., down to 3 gs., averaging fortwoteeth £6 9s. 6d., and for four-teeth £7 9s. Id. each; for six-teeth ewes, highest 70s., lowest 50s., average 53s. 8d. ; for four teeth ewes, highest 72s., lowest 53s., average 61s. ; for two-teeth ewes, highest 83s., lowest 50s., average 63s. 7d. Chilver lambs, highest 31s., lowest 30s. ^ MR. WALMSLEY'S RAM SHOW A.T RUDSTON.— The sheep were in good condition, and several fetched high prices. No. 3 was knocked down to Mr. Cranswick, Caythorpe, for £38 ; 30, to Mr. R. Crowe, Speeton, for £35 ; 10, to Mr. Bowser, Reigliton, for £25, and 20, for £17 ; 11, to Sir Tatton Sykes, £22; 14, Mr. Simpson, Pilmore House, £21., snd 2, £21 10s. ; Mr. G. L. Fox, Bramham Park, 16, for £15. The total amount of the letting was £528. SALE OP RAMS AT BRACKLEY. — Messrs. Russel and Son offered a number of Oxfordshire Down rams, the property of Mr. J. Chapman, of Westbury, and bred by Mr. King, of Wiuslow. The sheep were of high pedigree, being descended from the Winchendon flock. The following were purchasers, at prices annexed : Mr. Denchfield, Lilling- stone, 9 gs. ; Mr. A. Weston, Brackley, 5| gs. ; Mr. Hawkins, ll|gs. ; Mr. Luckett, 8j gs. ; Mr. Greaves, 8 gs. ; Mr. Clarke, 9 gs. ; Mr. Ilawtin, 7 gs. ; Mr. Luckett, 6 gs. ; Mr. Salmon, 7i gs. ; Mr. George, G gs. ; Mr. Strange, 7 gs. The average of tliose sold was £8 2s. 3d. per head. Two Oxford- shire shearling rams, the property of Mr. King, Bicester, were also sold : Mr. J. Bliss, 7 gs. ; Mr. J. Cave, 6 gs. SALE OF SHROPSHIRE EWES AND RAMS.— The Bridgnorth fair was held, and was very largely attended by local agriculturists and sheep breeders. Messrs. T. and F. Nock lield their annual sale of Shropshire sheep iu their Smithfield. The sheep included a collection of ewes and rams from flocks of breeders in the neighbourhood, vi^., Mrs. Wadlow, of Haughton, near Morville ; Mr, W. 0. Foster, of THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 263 Apley Park, near Shi ffual; Mr. T. Instone, of CoUauglitou, near Wenlock ; Mr. W. Yates, of Gnndle, near Shiffnal ; Mr. Massie, of Bradley, Corvedale ; Mr. H. J. Wilde, The Hay, near Erdiugton ; Mr. A. Gordon, The Hills, Clietton ; Messrs. E. Webb and Son, Kinver Hill, near Stourbridge, and several other gentlemen. There was a good competition for the choice ewes, in wliicli class tiiere was a large number. Mrs. Wadlow's ewes sold at from 56s, to 70s. ; Mr. Instone's, 56s. to 70s. ; Mr. Hassle's, 50s. to 60s. ; fat wethers fetched from 50s. to 68s. 6d. ; fat cows, £15 to £33 ; cows and calves, £16 to £19 10s. ; sows and pigs, £5 to £9. The sale of rams was spirited. Mrs. Wadlow's, 6 gs. to 15 gs. ; Mr. lustone's, 10 gs. to 18 gs. ; Mr. Yates's, 7 gs. to 16 gs. About 60 rams, 1,000 slieep, and 150 pigs were disposed of, and the sale averaged good prices. SALE OF HEREEORDS.— At the Herefordshire Agri- culiural Society's show, Messrs. Edwards an I Weaver offered for sale several lots of pedigree Hereford cattle. Among the lots Mr. Wm. Taylor's Tredegar was bought, in at 110 gs. The following lots were sold : Livingstone, to Mr. F. Haines, of Mansell, (or 36 gs. ; Augustus, Mr. George, of Felton, 30 gs. ; Bachelor 3nd, Mr. Chas. Davia, of Crumlin, 35 gs. ; Sir Oliver 4tli, Mr. Thomas Wall, 30^- gs. ; The Baronet, Mr. C. T. Hunt, Hereford, 30 gs. Messrs. Pye and Sunderland also had several consignments, but witii the ex- ception of one lot they were all bought in; this was Baron, which fetched 37^ gs. REVIEW OE THE CORN TRADE DURING THE PAST MONTH. The eventful weeks of harvest have now been reached and nearly passed with a very variable aspect. The first fortnight of August brought a great deal of rain and uncertainty with it, for much corn was in the fields and waiting to be housed, and some in their hurry were too hasty in this work, as shown in the samples newly thrashed, but the weather then gave signs of improve- ment, which have since been realised beyond expectation, and brought about a complete change. Prices at first varied with the weather, and tended upwards for old wheat. But on the successful gathering of the new, and its appearance in quantity in the London market, Talavera, which at first was worth 62s., closed, as well as all other sorts, at a decline of 10s., with only a slow sale at the reduction. As to foreign old, there was less depression in prices, for the previous large supplies had brought it much below old English samples, though to sell it freely was difficult at a reduction of 4s. to 5s. per qr. ; in fact, a sort of panic was produced, partly by the markets in France, which having for a time risen several shillings above our own, so suddenly and seriously gave way that the best white in Paris fell to 49s. to 50s., and the best flour to 38s. 6d. per sack, while foreign cargots bought for Havre were reshipped to this country as not wanted. Yet, after all, we believe that neither France nor Englandcan report much, if any, beyond an average crop ; but it was a change from the fear of famine rates to those of plenty that brought prices down so seriously. Some of the provincial markets had, indeed, overpassed Paris rates, and on the appearance of new samples of fine quality from the South, and fine weather for the completion of the Northern harvest, the trade perfectly lost heart, and there was a helter-skelter sative qui jtent. But bread will be wanted there as well as here; and the last crop, if as good as some believe it^to be, is not backed by accumu- lated stores as in times past, when there was far less ex- citement and depression. It is true foreign importers begin safely at low prices, and growers can have nothing to fear when there is little room for reduction ; and upon this principle we hope they will take courage, and not be unduly depressed, especially as feeding-stull's keep so relatively dear, that we have heard of Eivett wheat being used for cattle as giving most nourishment for its weight. The following rates were recently quoted at the places named : White Mayenne wheat at Paris 4'Js., red 45s. to 46s. ; Polish at JMarseilles 46s. 'kl., Ghirka 49s. ; new white at Bordeaux 50s. ; fine wheat at Courtrai 51s.; old at Louvain 63s., new 53s. ; old at Brussels 57s., new 51s.; old wheat at Hambro' 52s. ; wheat atBerlin 48s., at ]\Iayenne 50s. ; best old white at Danzig 57s., new 52s. to 56s. ; wheat at Cologne 48s. In Southern Russia prices were declining fast, and were yet unsettled. At San Francisco rates had fallen to 50s. per SOOlbs., cost, freight, and insurance ; at New York spring red to 37s. 3d. per 4801bs. free on board. The first Monday being a Bank holiday, we note the market of 31st July instead, which was not included in last month's review. There was but little business passing on that day. The trade opened with a small supply of English wheat, but there was plenty of foreign, and that principally from the United States. Very few fresh samples appeared on the Essex and Kentish stands. Though the weather was unsettled the demand was very slack, and to have forced sales would certainly have lowered the values of home growth. There was less depression in the foreign trade, and some considerable sales were made, at something belo'.v the previous Mon- day's quotations. In cargoes afloat there was very great quietness, but values were little changed. The country wheat trade, being generally very poorly supplied, from the exhaustion of stocks, was .little altered, though business was slow and the tendency downwards, excepting where there was bad weather ; though at Thirsk there was noted a decline of 2s. to 3s. per qr. Two-pence per cental more was demanded at Liverpool on Tuesday, which stopped business, but a slight rise was confirmed on Friday. At Edinburgh and Leith wheat advanced Is. per qr., and there was a firmness at Glasgow. I'oreigu at Dublin was firmly held. Of Irish scarcely anything was shown. On the second Monday the supply of English wheat was very scanty, but with an abundance of foreign, all from America except about one-fi(th. The show of fresh samples on the Essex and Kentish stands was moderate, and nearly all new. The prices asked for red were up to 56s., and those for Talevara 62^. ; but to sell it would have been necessary to take about 23. less, though rain was often falling. The foreign trade was limited, but the values of red for a fortnight back were maintained, though white samples rather gave way. Floating cargoes sold better at Is. more money. The rain fallen hitherto has not afl'ected the gatherings, excepting in the way of hindrance. The country trade this week was languid anl drooping. In spite of very small supplies, some places were Is. per quarter lower, and others Is. to 2s., as Shcflield and Ilothcrham. Liverpool was Id. dearer per cental on Tuesday, and Id. more on I'riday. Glasgow improved Is. per quarter, but at Edinburgh there was no alteration. Old maintained its value at Dublin, 264 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. and tlie only new sample exhibited brought 26s. per barrel. On the third Monday there was an increased English supply, but the foreign arrivals were somewliat less. But few English samples were exhibited this morning, and these were nearly all new. The weather, however, having taken up fine, it was difficult to sell at fully Is. decline ; foreign also manifested a downward tendency, and was an exceedingly slow sale, though nominally quoted as on the previous Monday. Floating cargoes, though held at former rates, were not so ready a sale. The country trade this week tended downwards, and was Is. to 2s. lower. Wakefield and Exeter were 3s. to 4s. lowei", and Liverpool 5d. per cental. Glasgow was dull, Leith and Edinburgh Is. down, and Dublin 6d. per barrel. The fourth Monday in London opened with a further increase of the English supply of wheat, and plenty still from foreign ports, about half being from America, with liberal supplies from Australia, India, and the Baltic, and a return cargo from Havre. There was a good show of new English wheat this morning, and, with the finest possible weather for a week past, sales could only be made at a decline of Gs. per qr. both on red and white samples, and that slowly. A reduction in foreign was also noted of 2s. to Ss. per qr., with very little done. The arrivals into London for four weeks were 10,076 qrs. English wheat, 182,140 qrs. foreign, against 9,462 qrs. English, 246,624 qrs. foreign, for the same period last year. The London exports were 1,868 qrs. Wheat, 1,520 cwts. flour. The London averages commenced at GOs. 3J. and closed at 57s. 9d. The imports into the kingdom for four weeks, ending 15th August, were 3,828,039 cwts. wheat, 127,516 cwts. flour, against 3,829,380 cwts. wheat, 320,080 cwts. flour in 1873. The general averages opened at 6O3. 5d. and closed at 58s. The flour trade has been dull and drooping in conse- quence of the unsettled aspect of the wheat trade. On the 10th town millers lowered their rates from 54s. to 50s., and on the 24th it was further reduced to 473., country sorts having fallen from 41s. to 39s., and foreign barrels given way Is. to Is.' Cd. Extra State had fallen at New York to 2I3. 5d. per brl., and flour nt Paris had declined to 3Ss. 6d. per sack. The London imports for four weeks were 41,809 sacks country sorts, 5,284 sacks 28,079 hrls. foreign, agiinst 49,285 sacks country, 21,543 sacks 48,430 brls. foreign in 1873. There having been large arrivals of maize till the fourth Jilonday, this grain till then was depressed, at reduced rates — say 32s. 6d. for mixed flat American, aud 37s. for round sorts. But rates having fallen below those of the places of growth, the decline seems to have reached its lowest, barley and pulse being relatively dearer. Tiie imports in four weeks were 123,034 qrs., against 61,366 qrs. for the same period in 1873. The malting season not having commenced, and very little new English barley having yet appeared, business has almost been limited to tlie sale of grinding qualities, which, from the small foreign supplies, have pretty well kept up their values — say, 32s. to 36s. per qr. New French ])ircels have been selling at 45s. per qr. and there- about ; but on the last marki't they were Is. to 33. per qr. cheaper, and a small parcel of new English only brought 453. per qr. The arrivals fur four weeks were 359 qrs. British 9,178 qrs. foreign, agaiust 204 qrs. British, 767 qrs. Irish, 26,924 qis. foreign for 1873. The malt trade has been \-(^\-^' quiet thrnu.!;li the month. Some quantity of old ytl leraaiuing on liaud, holders were more aiixions to sell, and prices were looking down, though they have been nominally without change. The oat trade, with heavy supplies, chiefly from Russia, every week, has fluctuated with the demand, and at the close of the month was about 6d. per qr. lower, Low 351bs. Russian were worth about 23s. 6d., fresh 381bs. 25s. 6d., and 401bs. 28s. per quarter ; but, as the bulk of the Russian supplies was now I'eceived, there was a possibility of the markets be- coming dearer, our own crops being very short, and the stock in granary being comparatively very light. The London imports in four weeks were 677 qrs. English, 910 qrs. Scotch, and 239,928 qrs. foreign, agamst 1,098 qrs. English, 98 qrs. Irish, aud 290,954 qrs. foreign in 1873. Of English beans the supplies have been unusually small ; and though they have been more than made up by foreign, the prices of this grain have been well maintained all through the month, from the constant demand. The new winter sorts that have hitherto come to hand have been remarkably dry and sound, and some small have brought as much as 463., weighing 661bs. per bushel. Alexandrian were scarcely worth over 43s., Smyrna and Algerian 443. Very few as yet seem to be arriving in Egypt, but the fine. weather with which the harvest has closed may bring plenty from France and Italy. The arrivals in four weeks were 1,031 qrs. English and 12,575 qrs. foreign, against 1,027 qrs. English aud 7,839 qrs. foreign in 1873. The supplies of English peas have been entirely of new sorts, principally hog feed, of good dry quality; but the yield is considered short. Duns have brought 43s. to 44s., while old white foreign have only been worth 453. to 463., so were relatively cheaper. This having brought them into demand for feeding, the prices have been hardening, but since the wheat trade has so gone down, we may find rivett sorts used as a cheaper and more fattening food. The London supplies for four weeks were 1,285 qrs. English, 9,491 qrs. foreign, against 1,027 qrs. English, 7,839 qrs. foreign, in 1873. Of linseed the receipts have been more liberal, espe- cially from India, but stocks generally being limited, holders have found no necessity to give way in price ; all feeding stuffs lately having been relatively dear from the drought. The four weeks' imports into London, were 52,037 qrs., against 37,067 qrs. in 1873. The seed trade has been generally firm. No heavy seed crop is expected from the clover plant, though we have generally considered a hot August highly favourable, and more may yet be produced than expected ; but stocln of over remaming have been too small for speculative purposes, and accounts from France are favourable as to tlie probable yield. The crop of winter tares has been scanty, and but few have yet been brotight to market, and for these high prices were asked, say lOs. 6d. per bush., but, we believe, less would be taken. COMPARATIVE AVERAGES. WHEAT Years. Qrs. i 1870... 48,690;- . 1871... 33,780J . 1873... 30,'132f . 1873... 25,2831 d. 51, 10 57 10 59 10 60 3 1874... 17,0794 ... 53 0 BARLEY, Qrs. 1981 1151 69 J 261J 119i 8. d. 32 11 35 9 30 3 37 2 45 0 OATS. Qrs. 8. d 2,037i - 28 0 1,201J ... 27 6 1,136 ... 23 7 1,1955 ... 23 8 1.492 ... 30 6 A V BRA GE S Fob the Six Webks BITDIKO 11, 1874 18, 1874 25, 1871 1, 1874 8, 1874 15, 1874 Aggregate of tlie above.. The same period in 1873.. July July July Aug. Aug, Aug. Wheat. Barley. 8. d. s. d. 60 9 41 7 60 10 39 6 60 5 40 1 59 8 46 1 53 6 3!) 1 58 0 45 0 59 8 41 11 69 10 36 4 Oats. B. d. 29 11 31 2 29 8 30 9 30 8 30 6 30 6 28 7 Printed by Watson and Hazeil, 265, Strand, London, W.C. THE FAEMEE'S MAGAZINE. CON T J^: N T S SEPTEMBER, 1874. Plate.— THE COMTESSE. Description of Plate ...... Holiday Time ........ The Tea Trade ....... Thin Seeding ........ The Landlord and Tenant Bill ..... Mangold Wurzel. — By the Northern Farmer .... The Birmingham Horse Show ...... East Cumberland Agricultural Society: Meeting at Carlisle. Penistone Agricultural Society ..... Mr. Prout and his System ...... Sale of Mr. T. E. Middleditch's Standing Crops Sale of Mr. Prout's Standing Crops ..... The Lothian Farmers' Club ...... The Galawater Farmers' Club ..... The Bedfordshire Prize Farms : The Gold Medal Farm Maidstone Farmers' Club: Horse v. Steam Poaver The Use of Sewage and the Prospects of Farming The Bath and West of England Society and Southern Counties Association Leicestershire Agricultural Society : Meeting at Leicester . The Gloucestershire Agricultural Society: Meeting at Tewkesbury . Malton Agricultural Society ..... The Dorchester Agricultural Society : Meeting at Dorchester The Bridlington Agricultural Society .... The Highland and Agricultural Society of Scotland : Meeting at Inverness The Duke of Sutherland's Reclamations .... Agriculture in Inverness ...... The Yorkshire Agricultural Society : Meeting at Sheffield . Belle Vue Cattle Show, at Manchester .... The Shorthorn in America ...... The Royal Agricultural Society of England .... The Royal Agricultural Society of Ireland: Meeting at Wexford "The Spencer Scheme:" Prizes for Best-managed Small Farms in Ireland Hereford Agricultural Society : Meeting in Hereford Preston Agricultural Society ..... The Border Union Agricultural Society : Meeting at Melrose Scottish Chamber of Agriculture . . . . The Local Authorities and the Diseases of Stock The Central Banffshire Farmers' Club : The Prohibition of the Cattle Show Borobridge Agricultural Society Steam Cultivation in Norfolk A Sewage Famine .... Two Years at a Sewage Farm Sale of Mr. Meadows' Shorthorns Sheep Sales and Lettings Review of the Corn Trade during the Past Month Market Currencies .... Page. 187 187 188 190 191 192 193 194 196 197 197 198 199 200 203 204 207 212 213 214 217 218 218 219 223 224 226 231 232 233 231 231 231 243 245 245 249 250 251 253 255 256 258 259 263 2 04 THK MARK LANE EXPRESS AND AGBICULTURAL JOURNAL IS THB LARGEST AND THE LEADING FARMER'S AND GRAZIER'S NEWSPAPER. PUBLISHED EVERY MONDAY EVENING, IN TIME FOR POST. Office of Publication and for Advertisements, 265, Strand, London. May be had of all Booksellers and Newpmen throughout the Kingdom , price Sevenpcnce, or ^1 lOs. 4d. per annum. IMPORTAiT TO FLOCKMASTERS. THOMAS BIGG, Agricultural and Veterinary Chemist, by Appointment to his late Royal Highness The Prince Consort, K.G., Leicester House, Great Dover Street, Borough, London, begs to call the attention of Farmers and Graziers to his valuable SHEEP and LAMB DIPPING COMPOSITION, which requires no Boiling, and may be used with Warm or Cold Water, for eSectually destrojing the Tick, Lice, and all other insects injurious to the Flock, preventing the alarming attacks of Fly and Shab, and cleansing and purifying the Skin, thereby greatly im- proving the Wool, both in quantity and quality, and highly Contributing to the general health of the animal. Prepared only by Thomas Bigg, Chemist, &c., at his Manu- factory as above, and sold as lollows, although any other quantity may be had, if required: — 1 lb. for 20 sheep, price, jar included £0 2 0 6 1b. 30 „ „ „ 0 3 0 8 1b. 40 „ „ „ 0 4 0 101b. 50 „ „ „ 0 5 0 20 lb. 100 „ „ (Caftk and measuro 0 10 0 301b. 150 „ „ included) 0 15 0 401b. 200 „ „ , 10 0 601b. 250 „ ., „ 13 6 60 1b. 300 „ „ , 17 6 80 lb. 400 ,. „ , 1 17 6 1001b. 500 ,, „ 2 5 0 Should any Flockmaster prefer boiling tho Composition, it will be equally effective. MOST IMPORTANT CERTIFICATE, From Mr. Hehepath, the celebrated Analytical Chemist :— Bristol Laboratory, Old Park, January 18th, 1861. Sir, — I have submitted your Sheep Dipping Composition to analysis, and find that the ingredients are well blended, and the mixture neutral. If it is used according to the directions given, I feel satisfied, that while it effectually destroys vermin, it will not injure the hair roots (or "yolk ") in the skin, the fleece, or the carcase. I think it deserves the numerous testimonials published. I am. Sir, yours respectfully, William Hbbapath, Sen., F.C.S., &c., &c., To Mr. Thomas Bigg Professor of Chemistry. Leicester House, Great iyover-street, Borough, London. He would also especially call attention to his SPECIFIC, or LOTION, for the SCAB or SHAB, which wiU be found a certain remedy for eradicating that loathsome and ruinous disorder in Sheep, and which may be safely used in all climates, and at all seasons of the year, and to all descriptions of sheep, even ewes in lamb. Price FIVE SHILLINGS per gallon— suflacient on an average for thirty Sheep (according to the virulence of the disease) ; also in wine quart bottles, IMPORTANT TESTIMONIAL. " Scoulton, near Htagham, Norfolk, April 16th, 1855, "Dear Sir,— In answer to yours ol the 4th inst., which would have been rephed to before this had I been at home, I have much pleasure in bearing testimony to the efficacy of your invaluable ' Specific for the cure of Scab in Sheep.' The 600 sheep were all dressed in August last with 84 gallons of the ' NoN-poisoNous Specific,' that was so highly recom- mended at the Lincoln Show, and by their own dresser, the best attention being paid to the flock oy my shepherd after dressing according to instructions left ; but notwithstanding the Scab continued getting worse. Being determined to have the Scab cured if possible, I vprote to you for a supply of your Specific, which I received the foUovraig day; and although the weather was most severe in February during the dressing, your Specific proved itself an invahiable remedy, for in three weeks the Sheep were quite cureil ; and I am happy to say the young lambs are doing remansably weU at present. In conclusion, I beUeve it to be the safest and best remedy now in use. " I remain, dear Sir, " For JOHN TINGEY, Esq., " To Mr. Thomas Bigg. ' " R. RENNEY. B3r Flockmasters would be well to beware of such pre- parations as " Non-poisonous Compositions :" it is only necessary to appeal to their good common sense and judg- ment to be thoroughly convinced that no "Non-poisonous" article can poison or destroy insect vermin, particularly such as the Tick, Lice, and Scab Parasites— creatures so tenacious of life. Such advertised preparations must be wholly useless , or they are not what they are represented to be, DIPPING APPARATUS £14, £5, £4, & £3. BRYANt&MAY'S MATCHES. HAIL STOEMS. THE EOYAL FARMERS' COMPANY, No. 3, NORFOLK STREET, STRAND, LONDON, INSURES WHEAT, BAELEY, OATS/ BEANS, PEAS, & OTHER CROPS, AGAINST LOSS BY HAIL STORMS AT FIYEPEIN^CE PER ACRE. FI LI SEEDS and GLASS are also Insured, anees at rates as low as other well-established Offices. ances of any description at equitable rates* Four-fiftnb of the profits divided ifth Year. LOSSES. — Prompt and Liberal settlement of claiirs. Further particulars may be had at the Chief Office, or of the Agents. JOHN SHARP, Secretary. '^ No. 4, Vol. XLVL] OCTOBER, 1874. [Third Sekies. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE, AND MONTHLY JOURNAL OF THE AOIIICULTURAL INTEREST. TO THE FARMERS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM. LONDON : PUBLISHED BYROGERSON AND TUXFORD, 265, STRAND. PRICE TWO SHILLINGS. WATSON AND HAZELL,] [PRINTBRS, 266, STRAND. THE FAEMEE'S MAGAZII^E. CONTENTS. OCTOBER, 1874. Plate.— WINTER-DE-COTE. Page. Description of Plate ....... 265 Practical and Parliamentary Senses ...... 266 The Sickness of the Soil . . . . . . • 267 On the Banks of the Nile ....... 268 The Implement Trade and the Strike ...... 269 The Queen's Plates — " A More Useful Purpose" .... 270 Northamptonshire Agricultural Society : Meeting at Northampton . . 271 Warwickshire Agricultural Society : Meeting at Knowle . . . 375 Staffordshire Agricultural Society : Meeeing at Tamworth . . . 278 The Eumoured Reform of the Game-Laws ..... 280 The Impediment to Agricultural Improvement. .... 281 Business Hours and Business Habits ...... 282 Australian Wines ........ 282 Farmers' Politics in Scotland. . . . ... . 283 The Agricultural Statistics of Ireland for 1874 .... 285 The Growth of Flax in Ireland ...... 287 The Local Authority in Scotland ...... 288 Scotch Game Case ........ 290 Manchester . ........ 291 The Adulteration Committee Report ...... 293 The Potato Bug . . . , . . . .295 A Disbanded Grange ........ 296 Poor-Law Conference in the North ...... 297 Carmarthenshire Farmers' Club : Tenant-Right .... 301 Horse-Breeding in France . . . . . . . 302 Wiltshire Bacon . . . . . . . . 303 Highway Legislation ........ 305 Agricultural Geology : The Northern Division .... 307 The Agricultural Statistics of Ireland ..... 3ll Welsh Cattle and Cattle Shows ...... 312 The Worcestershire Agricultural Society: Meeting at Dudley . . 313 Airedale Agricultural Society : Meeting at Bingley .... 316 Lytham and Kirkham Agricultural Society : Meeting at Lytham , . 317 The Bury (Lancaster) Agricultural Society: Meeting at Chesham . . 318 Craven Agricultural Society : Meeting at Skipton .... 319 Whitby Agricultural Society. ...... 321 worsley and swinton agricultural society ..... 322 East Cheshire Agricultural Society : Meeting at Macclesfield . . 3'23 The Halifax and Calder Vale Agricultural Society .... 323 The Amalgamated Manchester and Liverpool and Royal North Lancashire Agricultural Society: Meeting at Stalybridge. . . . 324 Huntingdonshire Agricultural Society : Meeting at St. Neots . . 327 Stock Sales : The Duke of Devonshire's Shorthorns ..... 329 Lord Bective's Shorthorns ...... 331 The Late Mr. Gibbon's Herd . . . . . . 333 Mr. Richardson's Shorthorns ...... 333 Mr. Cheyney's Shorthorns . . . . . . 334 Suffolk Horses and other Stock at Covehithe .... 336 Sheep Sales and Lettings . . . . . . . 337 Fancy Stock Sales ... ..... 342 Review of the Corn Trade during the Past ^Jonth .... 343 Market Currencies ........ ?44 nMi '"\ THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. OCTOBER, 1874. PLATE. WINTER - DE - COTE, A Royal Hereford Bull. Wintcr-de-Cote (4253), bred by the late Mr. Thomas Edwards, at Wintercote, Leominster, and now the pro- perty of his widow, a red with a white face, was calved on August 10th, 1870, and is by Leominster 3rd (3211), out of Pinky 3rd, by Young Grore (2888), her dam Pinky, by Rambler (1046)— Pink 2ud, by Wellington (1113) —Pink, by Stretford (1749). Leominster 3i-d, also bred by the late Mr. Edwards, a red with white face, calved April 22nd, 1868, was by Tomboy (3546), out of Primrose, by Adforton (1839), her dam Gloucester, by Sir Newton (1731) — Red Rose, by Wellington (1113)— Rose, by Stretford (1749). Leo- minster 3rd was another Royal bull, having taken a first prize as a yearling at the Manchester meeting of the Royal Agricultural Society, as well as other premiums later on. Pink 3rd, also bred by Mr. Edwards, a red with a white face, was calved on November 1st, 1866, and dropped her first calf. Sir Robert (4131), by Tomboy (3546), in April, 1869 ; Winter-de-Cote following in 1870. The first time we encountered Winter-de-Cote was at the Hereford Show, in the autumn of 1872, when he won in the two-year-old class, and we thus wrote of him : " For the best bull in the yard people turned to the two-year-olds, where Mrs. Edwards was first with Winter-de-Cote, the best yearling of last autumn, and hitherto unbeaten ; though he has never ventured far from home, his only trials having been at Leominster and Hereford. He is a straight, deep, heavy-fleshed bull. high-bred in appearance, but with a good masculine stamp about his head and in his general character. The class was a superior one to that at Cardiff, and Wiuter- de-Cote, if he goes on, threatens to be the best bull of his year." In 1873, at the Bath and AVest of Eagland show at Plymouth, Winter-de-Cote was only highly-commended in the aged class. Von Moltke and the Provost being put above him ; although we thought that " the Provost would never beat him again." At the Hull Royal Winter-de-Cote took the first prize in the two and three- year-old class, another first in the family class at Here- ford, and a similar prize at Leominster. In 1874 Winter-de-Cote has taken a first prize at the Bath and West of England meeting at Bristol, and a first prize at the Bedford meeting of the Royal Agricultural Society at Bedford, where he "looked to have fed and thrived" only too well. At Hereford Winter-de-Cote was also first when he beat the Provost ; but at Dudley he was beaten in turn by old Bachelor, put second to him at Bedford. These are the chief of Winter-de-Cote's performances. TO THE BINDER.— Through a mistake on the part of the printer during the Editor's absence from town, the wrong plate was used for the September number ; the print in which should be cancelled, and that of the mare, Comtesse, placed to face the description. Old St;kies.] Vol. LXXVI.— No. 4. 266 THE FAEMEE'S MAGAZINE. PRACTICAL AND PAELIAMENTARY SENSES. " In reviewing the past session from a country-sid point of view, it is really difficult to surmise what the honourable gentleman will be able to say beyond the fact of his having consistently voted with Blue and White and resolutely opposed Black and Yellow." It was thus that we wrote immediately on the breakiug-up of Parliaraeut and since then the honourable gentleman on the country- side has found the simplest possible solution of the difficulty — by saying nothing whatever. For some years past we have week for week during the autumn been able to string together column after column of agricultural table-talk ; whereas, so far, during the round of meetings we have had to be content with a few words or so fi"om the chairman, as tacked on to the now fashionable luncheon or more orthodox dinner. The county member has be- come shy even of " the hazy platitudes of Local-taxation ;" and when he has eared to talk, his speech, as we had antici- pated, turns on the Labour Question and the good harvest. Not that the honourable gentleman has commonly cora- mitted himself to much more than mere congratulatiou, as far away the most able address of the off-season has been that of Lord Spencer at Northampton ou Thursday, which we give in another column. As chair- man of a dinner where he was well-supported by farmers he told the meeting that in some parts of the country the agricultural labourer was in a wretched condition, and that " he was not surprised at an endeavour having been made to improve it." He spoke to the great number of empty cottages in many of their large villages, one in his own neighbourhood " having now no less than fifty-two empty cottages," a result consequent on the state of things as brought about by the Law of Settlement, when short-sighted landlords pulled down their cottages wher- ever they could, and drove the labourer away from his work into the towns and villages. Naturally so vicious a system is coming to correct itself, while there is some- thing very judicial in the manner in which Lord Spencer sums up the case, and his speech is one of the few which will tell with thinking men and really do good. In the more complimentary effusions from the dinner- table it is noticeable, nevertheless, how very little jubila- tion has been uttered over the fact that the right Party is now in power. We hear nothing of what Mr. Disraeli's Government did for the farmer during the past session, and not much more of anything which it is likely to do hereafter. It is true, certainly, that when in Warwick- shire the other day Mr. Newdegate with a gentleman- like melancholy assured his constituents that " the present Parliament had shown itself more ready to turn its atten- tion in a practical and legislative sense to the requirements of agriculture than any Parliament of late years." Now, of all the nice subtilties of expression, what in the world can this practical sense mean when uttered in a Parlia- mentary sense ? Has the present Government — for this is what it really comes to — shown itself ready to attend to anything which Agriculture has required of it ? Has it not, on the contrary, carefully turned away its attention from such agricultural requirements as the extension of Tenant-Right " in a legislative sense," the correction of the Game evil "in a legislativi sense," or the repeal of the Malt-tax in any sense ? But a fine phrase, surely, is this same " practical sense," and honourable gen- tlemen are not the only people, as it would appear, who may indulge in it. Thus, in tiie adjoining couuty of Stafford, Mr. IMasfen ignores the Club and the Office, and even the editor's room, and wants the opinion of practical men on such vital and intricate questions as whether at a breeding show they should encourage pure blood, or mongrels or animals of doubtful lineage ? He would have the judges adhere to the true type, and breeders of sheep who reared from cross-breds should not be put forward as pioneers. In " a practical sense" we cannot say much for the discussion which followed on this text word. One of the Shorthorn judges, Mr, Robinson, thought very prudently the less he said about his department the better ; Mr. Mansell and Mr. Little, two of the sheep judges, never noticed the cross-bred question, and Mr. Evans, a third judge, fairly snuffed it out by saying, all to the point, that " it was no compliment to exhibitors to suppose that they would show cross-bred animals, though of course any man might sometimes make a mistake in purchasing. It might be taken for granted that a man who bred sheep or cattle would do so from animals of the right type and character. That principle would no doubt be recognised by the judges, but perhaps the less that was said on the subject before the show the better." And so it was left to the meeting to make the greatest goose they could by putting two together. But perhaps the most remarkable feature in these pro- ceedings was ignoring, in " a practical sense," the Club and the Office at the office-dinner of an institution which s a club. The Staffordshire Agricultural Society is as much a club as the Smithfield Club or the Bake well Club, that is a body of men banded together with a particular purpose, and that purpose a cattle show. Then, again, this was an office dinner, that is, so far as our experience goes, of such officers as judges, stewards, and committee men, where, according to T/ie Midland Counties Herald, " the committee do not even carry out their own rules in the selection of judges, but appoint members of their own body in the face of rule 24 : That the jud(/es appointed for general purposes should he vjholly unconnected v:ith the Society." Speaking in " a practical sense," it would be only wholesome that rules should be either observed or expunged, or the manage- ment stultifies itself. These Birmingham or Midland strictures, moreover, serve to remind one that as Mr. Masfen is himself a frequent speaker at the meetings of the Midland Club he may have encountered there eloquent gentlemen " whose forming was confined to the office, or the club, or the editor's room," just as Mr. Mechi was wont a long time ago to be reminded of his City offices when speaking at (he London Club. But the agricultural world has, to its credit, outgrown any such narrow petty prejudice as this ; for in almost every pursuit, that of agriculture included, some of the most marked improvements and advancements have come from the outsider, who has thought out his idea in the office or the library rather than at the plough-tail. It behoves us to say as little as possible of the Editor's room, or of any reforms in the conduct of our Agricultural Societies which may have come from such a quarter ; but we may venture to say, speaking in a strictly " practical sense," that an Editor has been invited before now to act as judge at a meeting of this very Staffordshire Society, and that at the office dinner preceding the show, he, like the judges of last week, declined to indicate any special line which he might take when discharging his duties. Nowhere have the "opinions" and authority of the prac- tical man been more thoroughly upheld than in the columns of this Journal; but we question very much the policy of a farmer by profession going out of his way, as it were, to sneer at people who unfortunately do not happen to unite THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 267 the highest intellect with the nicest practice. That such policy did not tell at Tamworth is sufficiently evident, for the discussion provoked after this fashion came to a ludicrous conclusion ; as we may show further, should we care to return to the momentous principles involved in this memorable debate. THE SICKNESS OF THE SOIL. The partial failure of the wheat crops for the three last years has led many persons to conclude that the laud of England has become sick of such grain, and that it will never recover, except by a protracted fallow ; in other words, by laying it down for pasturage, or by resuming the triennial course of husbandry, which consists of two white crops and a fallow. The present year will be enough, one would suppose, to dissipate the idea of sickness of the soil through any other known means than injudicious cultiva- tion, or starvation, by the witliolding of manure. There is no doubt that, like working horses or any other animals, hard labour and scanty feeding will have its effect, whether upon sensitive animals or insensible plants. Dr. Hooker's theory notwithstanding, which, literally speak- ing, gives plants the power of swallowing and digesting their food. If the farmer neglects, or is too poor to cultivate his land in the proper manner, he must expect the certain consequence — a short yield and poor quality, as the inevitable result. This complaint of sickness of the soil is no new one, but the rather very old — say as the Christian Era itself. Did not Columella during the first century write on the subject, in reply to those who just discovered the same mare's nest? He has a whole chapter about it but we shall be content with a paragraph : " It is not, therefore, from weariness, as very many have believed, nor from old age, but indeed from our own slothfulness, that our cultivated lands do not so bountifully answer our expectations as formerly ; for we might receive a greater product if the earth were refreshed and cherished Vv'ith frequent seasonable and moderate stercoration." Arthur Young, whose opinions were ever founded on facts, made a series of thirty-six experiments of a six- years' course of cropping or rotation, the results of which were published in the 23rd volume of the Annals of Agriculture of which he was the sole editor. The experiments were made upon a piece of old pasture of many years' standing, the soil a sandy loam, with a clay-marl subsoil, and his deductions were as follows : That potatoes, as a fallovt^ crop, were more exhausting than any other without plenty of manure, and that barley, beans, and oats succeed better than wheat after potatoes. That beans ai"e the most valuable crop on new land, and that the fertility of such land depends for its continuance greatly on the number of bean crops planted on it, and that the oftener they were grown on it, the better were the succeeding crops of other kinds of produce, and that three successive crops of beans were followed by an extra- ordinary produce of wheat. He also found that succes- sive crops of white corn are destructive of fertility, and that three such crops will reduce the land to a foul and unprofitable condition. He also ascertained by the ex- periment that beans and barley alternately, and beans and wheat, also alternately, were the two most productive courses ; and lastly, that five crops of beans and one of wheat not only yielded good profit, but left the land in the very best condition. On new laud also, as is well known by every farmer of any intelligence, oats are the most profitable crop that can be grown. On the other hand, turnips, cabbages, and potatoes are declared to be the most unprofitable in any course of cropping ; and yet, what would the farmers of such light lands as those of Norfolk, Suffolk, and others of the Eastern Counties do without the four-course husbandry ? And how could the supply of animal food be provided without green crops ? The number of cattle and sheep kept in Arthur Young's time was much smaller than at present, but the graziers had learned to know the value of green crops, although they were chiefly valuable as substitutes for the bare fallow, and as materials of which, with the help of cattle, manure is manufactured, besides keeping the land clean by hoeing. There is an improvement in this respect, in the value of root and green crops from the increased consumption and enhanced value of fat cattle ; indeed, of animals of every kind on the farm, by which the profits of breeding as well as of fattening are rendered more remunerative. A good deal of land has been withdrawn from the cultivation of cereal produce, and laid down in grass, especially in Ireland ; but this is quite irrespective of any decadence or diminished fertility of the soil, and is in consequence of the increased value of pasture laud and the high price of butcher's meat ; but in Ireland specially, from the climate being more adapted, by its dampness, to pasture land and the rearing of cattle than for the cultivation of cereal produce. Ireland shows a decline in breadth of land sown yearly ; and whilst meat is dear, and the transit of cattle from abroad diSicult, and therefore limited to the nearest countries on the Con- tinent, the acreage in corn crops cannot increase. Returning to the subject on which we started : Those who are croaking over the alleged decadence of the soil in Eugland will he disappointed this season by the goodness of many grain crops and a partial failure of green and root crops. If the land does not produce what it ought or what it formerly did, this is the fault either of the farmer, who does not bestow the outlay upon it, or that of the landlord who will not allow the tenant to deviate from the stereotyped course of cropping laid down in the lease or agreement. No absolute rules can be laid down for a rotation of crops applicable to all soils or situations. The fact is, that except for the greater convenience of the farmer, a rota- tion of crops is not absolutely essential to good or profitable farming. By working on scientific principles, for which a large number of the present race of farmers are qualified, they may, without impoverishing the land, grow any crops they please, but the landlord, or rather his factotum, the lawyer, steps in and condemns, very probably, the very course that would both benefit the land and best remunerate the farmer ; and thus, half the land of England is only half profitable to any of those parties who possess an interest in it. SLAUGHTER-HOUSES.— The Cattle Markets' Committee of the Corporation, in view of the approaching compulsory closing of private slaughter-houses in the Metropohs, have been authorised to construct fmm time to time, as may be re- quired, 20 additioual sh\uditer-houses upon vacant ground on the east side of tlie Metropulitau Cattle Market in Copenliagen- fields, Islington, contiguous to the Great Nortliern Railway. The plans have received the approval ofthe trade, and the new buildings will be replete with every accommodation. The slaughter-house?, when erected, will be let on short leases, and at rents varying according to the size and construction of the buildings, from £130 to £36 a year. The rents in all are estunated to produce about £1,900 a year, or a little over 7 per cent, on the cost of the works. S 2 268 THE FAEMEE'S MAGAZINE. ON THE BANKS OF THE NILE. That a vast population once dwelt alonj; the banks of the Nile the numerous remains of the ruins of cities, pyramids- temples, and obelisks sufficiently attest. Even at the pre- sent day, with all our experience of great centres where people congregate together, the visitor is astonished at the incomprehensible vastness of these monuments of an- tiquity. Although many thousands of years have rolled be- tween, whilst Athens, Rome, Pekin, Delhi, the deserted cities of j\Ionf ezuma, may be judged in comparison, yet the immense exteut of what was "hundred-gated" Thebes becomes as much a marvel to ourselves as it was to the world in the days of Homer. Were it not for the bar- barian acts of man, the propitious climate and the dura- bility of the buildings would have permitted the palaces to be seen and the streets to be trodden in the same con- ditions as they were by the feet of Moses. The judgment of modern critics has been passed upon the exact position held by Egyptian architecture amongst the other works of the kind, but the engineering methods that must have been brought into existence to accomplish such feats in stonemanship seem to remain unfathomed. With regard to the laws that governed the landed system and the condition of agriculture that would have provided for the multitudes who then lived, worked, and died, somewhat may be gleaned from Holy Writ, somewhat from ocular evidences, and the void must still further be supplied by conjecture. An ingenious and interesting theory has been advanced by M. Barthelemy St. Hilaire, member of the Institute, and one of the learned Erenchmen engaged in the preparatory surveys for the Suez Canal, and this seems to receive confirmation from the state of landed property in Egypt ft the present time. The preservation of this tract of land from the surrounding desert depended upon the rise and fall of the Nile, which might well be worshipped as a deity, whose fertilising influence shaped alike the destinies of the na- tion that lived upon the soil Ihus created. To retain the waters required a complicated system of irrigation that could not be left to the caprice of individual proprietors ; and to the operation of this necessity may be attributed the fact mentioned in the Bible of Joseph having acquired for Pharaoh the whole of the lands of Egypt. The river has never ceased to flow its regular course ; and when irrigation has been carried to the highest perfection, the labours of man have obtained the greatest advantages from the bounties of Nature. Thus, ever since the time of Joseph, nearly two thousand years before the Christian era, all claim on the part of individuals to territorial property has been abolished iu Egypt. The State is the sole possessor of the soil, and the people have only the usufruct. The Nile therefore, which exercises its bene- ficent influence, has been the means of creating a despotism that has lasted to the present day. The soil is so fertile that it seldom requires the plough. Every year, about the summer solstice, at the end of June, from causes still imperfectly known, the river gradually rises in the upper country whence it descends, and continues to swell as it approaches the sea, into which it empties itself. This progressive increase con- tinues for nearly four months, and reaches its height in the middle of October. The river then sinks, as slowly as it has risen, and when, in June, its waters are at the lowest, it begins to rise again as in the preceding year. The periodical recurrence of this phenomenon is itself a great benetit ; but the Nile has also two other advantages, no less admirable : it never devastates its shores, and its swollen waters perpetually deposit a mud, which is the most fertilizing of manures. From the supplies of slime brought down annually, the country has been enabled to bear three, and even four, crops without the least im- poverishment. In LovTcr Egypt sowing commences immediately after the waters subside, the seed only rcr quiring to be strewed over the land, and it either sinks into the soft earth by its own weight, or is trodden down by the cattle driven over it. This is generally done in November : in Eebrnary the fields are verdant, and in May the harvest takes place. In July rice and maize are again planted, and yield a second harvest in September. In Upper Egypt the constant artificial supply of irriga- tion required by the land gives to the farmer increasing employment. Deprived of rain and exposed to a burning sun, the land would be arid and barren if not constantly refreshed with moisture. After the water has been pre- served in canals and wells, it is raised by Persian water- wheels, worked by oxen, or by means of hand machines of more simple construction. Sovviug begins here about November, as in lyower Egypt, and the corn begins to spring up before the end of the mouth, and by December gives the country tlie ap])earance of a verdant spring. In January lupins, dolicoes, and cumins are cut for the press. By April flax has been ripened, and the plants pulled up ; tobacco leaves are gathered, and the wheat- harvest is got in. In July there is a third crop of trefoil and a second of rice. October is the month for all sorts of leicuniinous seeds to be sown. In one of the tombs of the Pharaohs there are paintings of the arts and sciences in vogue in E'zypt, illustrating probably the predominant features of the reign, and from these we learn that the customs of agriculture have remained unchanged. The shadonfs, or machines for drawing water, which are seen at every step on the banks of the river, are precisely the same as those equally rude and clumsy used in ancient times. The ploutjh is still constructed of two simple pieces of wood, seldom fur- nished with an iron share : there is neither shovel nor wheelbarrow, and the fellahs very often remove the earth with their hands, or at most in baskets made of palm- leaves, which they put on their shoulders. The dwellin£;s in the villages and provincial towns are all formed of clay, there being scarcely any wood for building. The suu-baked bricks, of which they are constructed, give them a dull and sombre appearance, which the sun cannot enliven in the narrow streets, built to exclude the heat : they usually consist merely of a ground-floor. Most of them are only an occasional shelter, being inhabited very little during the day, and barely used to sleep in at night. The people have no furniture of any value to lock up ; the animals lie on the open ground, like their masters, in a climate where it never rains. The house serves as a shelter for the women only, and infants at the breast. With this indiff'erence to progress, so visible throughout the East, and the use of the most imperfect instruments, there are evidences of incessant toil in the innumerable earth-works, indispensable not only for the great embank- ments from village to village, and for the canals, but for any cultivation of the fields. To Egypt the subject of the greatest importance is the construction and maintenance of these canals : the more she has of them, the richer she becomes. She possesses neither forests nor mines, which is an immense want, but she has this wonderful stream, capable of supplying many, if not all her wants and deficiencies. The Viceroy has directed attention to an extended pro- duction of cotton, and more recently to the sugar-cane. TSD FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 269 The cost of tlie cultivation, including ploughing and irri- gation, is about eight pounds per feddan, or acre, which produces about one hundred pounds weight of sugar. The hugar makers, the refiners, and the engineers at the Vice- roy's establishments are all Europeans, and most of them Englishmen. The strange anomaly was witnessed for some time of this country, which has always been the granary of surrounding nations, being transformed into an importer of grain. The o])pression of the fellahs, from whom even seed corn is extracted, has been another cause of this falling oiF. In this land, which from time imme- morial has always been dominated by one all-powerful and imperious will, it is not unusual for a village sheikh to be seized and flogged, and even the women have been flogged, to make them give up their jewellery for taxes due by their husbands. Whether jnuch of this tyranny is efl'ected without the direct cognizance of the Government it is difficult to ascertain ; but a successful tax-gatherer is considered as sure to obtain favour and promotion. Since 1872 a system of compounding for taxes has been introduced, Government having invited landowners to pay in six years t?- e taxes for twelve years. To those who accept this proposition — and it is considered "by the Egyptian landowners as a command — half the present tax is for ever remitted on their having made six double payments, nor will the tax be subjcet to future variations. Thus, 'he o vner of laud now pnying £100 a year will, should he pay £1,200 in six years, receive a title by which he will hold his land for ever, subject to the payment of £50 anuually. There are about 5,450,000 feddans, or acres, of land under cultivation in Egypt, and a feddan that in 1865 was worth £50 might have been purchased since for about £5 The whole of the population is available for agricultural purposes. Were Europeans, who could have redress against direct opjiression, to purchase land and cultivate it scieutifically, considerable profits might be made. They would have many annoyances to contend against, but none that an energetic Englishman with the support he would be entitled to claim would not be able by tact, firmness, and patience to overcome. Such is the wonderful fertility of the soil, when fairly treated according to the normal succession of crops and the perfection of the irrigatiou system when not arbitrarily interfered with for the enriching of certain ground, that a good crop of grass and grain of all kinds can always be expected. THE IMPLEMENT TRADE AND THE STRIKE. Whether on the whole the recent agitation has been or is likely to be beneficial to the farm labourer as a body, is an open question, and one to which a decisive reply is hardly warrantable at present ; but there can be no doubt that the implement manufacturers have reason to congratulate themselves upon an influx of trade due in great measure to the labour disturbances. As long as labour was plentiful, wages low, and the relationship of employers and employed on a pleasant footing, a large proportion of farmers did not trouble themselves much about labour-saving machinery. There were many rea- sons for keeping on in the old way, the chief of which was the dislike to discharging men who had served them for years. Then, the use of machinery involves a little extra anxiety and superintendence on the part of the master, as well as an outlay which he is often strangely unwilling to make, although it will be so speedily repaid out of his wages account. In short, the force of habit was entirely in favour of the employment of many men at low wages, and against the increased use of labour- saving machinery. Hundreds of intelligent and well-to- do farmers have hitherto never used a reaping-machine, and declare that they will uot use one as long as they can get men enough to do the work at anything like moderate wages. One explanation of this strange fact is, that where the harvest is let to the men to "see it in," that is, by piecework, their prejudice against new machines has prevented them from making due allowance for the assistance aflbrded to them by the reaping machine ; but this is not all. Even where the harvest is let by the month, no machine is used in num- bers of instances, although the use of one would effect a saving of at least 10 per cent, on the cost of getting in the crops. The truth is that the farmers of this country re- quire well stirring up before they adopt any new courses, whether in relation to business or to politics, and in this case the stirring has been done by the Labourers' Union. If the Union gives increased independence to the labourers, it gives it also to the employers ; the farmer having long laboured under the serious disadvantage of a feeling of dependence upon a very burdensome obligation — namely, that of finding employment for a larger num- ber of men than were absolutely required. Now that the men have ruptured the old relations, this obligation is no longer felt, or if still felt, is at least much weakened. Probably it will be best for both parties concerned that it shall be altogether lost sight of, and the relationship of the agricultural labourer to his employer be placed upon a strictly commercial footing. Wherever there is charity there is pauperism, and it was in every way desirable to sever the men from their semi-pauperised position ; but the Union leaders were wrong in declaring that the masters should not reduce the number of their workmen. The cultivation of the soil by a minimum of skilled and well-paid workmen using improved machinery is what the best friends of the labourer must look forward to, if they will not blind themselves to the signs of the times. There is nothing more safely to be trusted as a rule than the careful regard of men of business for their own interest. Employers will not be content with few men when they knowit wouldbe to their advautagetoemploymany; and any attempt to induce them from motives of philanthropy to keep on more than they require for the profitable conduct of their business, is a great mistake, and one that is in the long run injurious to all concerned. The consumer not less than the employer or the workman is interested in the economy of the expense of food production. Con- trary to the views of those mistaken philanthropists who advocate a system which involves, according to their own representation, a maximum of producers and a maximum of produce, it is the interest of the nation at large that a maximum of produce should be obtained by a minimum of producers. Improved machinery, forced into greater use by the agitation of the labourers, is tending to this result, and in the end all classes may be thereby benefited. It is true that the removal ot surplus labourers may be necessary, but as the leaders of the Agricultural Labourers' Union profess to have found their Canaan in Canada, they should be the last to regret even the enforced emigration of the " serfs of the soil" from the land of bondage. But have we, after all, more farm labourers in the country than might be profitably employed even at in- creased wages, and with the utmost available use of agri- cultural machinery, if it were made the interest of every tenant-farmer to do his very best by the land? We be- 270 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. lieve not. Surplus and deficiency are relative terms, and the surplus of to-day may easily become the deficiency of to-morrow. To men who dare not farm at their best there is a surplus of labourers in many parts of the country, but with perfect security for tenants' capital the complaint would soon be reversed. The change would, of course, be a work of time, and emigration might still go on in the interval. Not only is the capital of farmers unprotected, but it is unfortunately in many instances defi- cient. But for any such failing our iniquitous land tenancy laws are in great measure responsible, since through theuimen are tempted to hire more land than their capital enables them to do justice to, simply because they would not dare to do justice to the small holding instead. With a fair law of Tenant-Right, capital would soon flow to the land, -which is everywhere a favourite investment when artificial hindrances are not imposed. After a reasonable time, then, it is probable that, even with the utmost advancement of agricultural mechanism, our pre- sent number of agricultural labourers would find ready employment at satisfactory wages, and would no longer be tempted to go where, according to travellers' tales the frost and the mosquito alike bite sharply. In the absence of the desired incentive to improved farming, who will derive the chief benefit from the economy of labour-saving machinery ? Undoubtedly those who have hitherto swallowed nearly all the advan- tages of agricultural improvement — the landlords. Of course the increased use of machinery tends in the first instance to keep wages down, and, other things being equal, must always have that effect. But as machinery advances in perfection, its common effect is to stimulate production, and this it will undoubtedly do in agriculture if unfavourable conditions are removed. Then labour will reap its proper share of the advantage derived from the cheaper production of food, and will have reason to bless and not to curse the advancement of mechanical science. But if much work, which is at present done by hand, is in future to be done by machinery, whilst tenant-farmers are still to be left without the security which alone will pro- mote their highest enterprise, what will be the result ? Why that they will reduce the number of their men, and that the few who are even then employed will, unless emi- gration shall be mere extensive than we have any reason to expect, have but little command over the wages market. In that case it is easy to see that the economy effected by the machinery will soon chiefly go to increase the rent- rolls of our landowners, and neither farmer, labourer, nor consumer will be materially benefited. Such a result could only take place in a branch of enterprise hampered by burdensome and unnatural restrictions. Everyone knows what those restrictions are in the case under con-' sideration, but few have yet had their eyes opened to the vastness of the interests involved in their retention or removal. THE QUEEN'S PLATES— "A MORE USEFUL PURPOSE." In our report of the last meeting of the Royal Agri- cultural Society of England, as held upon Bedford race- course, we were enabled to state that the fifty-pound plate which had been given by the Dukes of Bedford for nearly a century had now been withdrawn, and that, as s omething of a consequence, the races had fallen through "The course has been turned to other uses, and the Queen's Plate, for which there can be now no call, should be transferred to the horse-ring." Since then the Marquis of Exeter has taken more direct action, and given notice that after this year he "intends to devote Stamford course and stand to more useful purposes," as, " under these circumstances," the race-meeting will be abandoned. No reasonable man can quarrel with tbe resolution arrived at almost simultaneously by the Duke of Bedford and the Marquis of Exeter. In fact, it has long been a matter of astonishment that country gentlemen of position should continue to give their countenance to that open rascality and utter demoralisation, the now common features of a country race-day. The neighbours, as a rule, carefully keep out of the way, and the full attendance is con- tributed through special trains, which bring in the scum of London, Manchester, or Birmingham, as the site may suit. And yet noblemen, country squires, and members of Parliament fed it to\ be* " a duty" to subscribe towards such scenes, to sutler their names to appear on the lists of stewards, or even to give over their grounds for purposes which have for some time past become far more typical of a national disgrace than a national sport. It is only to be hoped that the example which we have cited may be followed by others, and that one of its first effects may be to induce the Government to move. Everybody, including the racing men themselves, sees the absurdity of continuing the custom of olferinsr Royal Plates at these meetings, the competition for which" is commonly so small as to preclude even betting on the result. A correspondent of The Times has, al; length really come to see this, as his letter has been supported by another through the same channel from Mr. S. Sidney, who subscribes himself as " the author of the Book of the Horse," and who states that Corisande won a Queen's Plate by twenty lengths. In point of fact she won by thirti/ lengths, but the author of " The Horse " is evidently well up in the history of this famous mare, as he also states in " the book" that Corisande won the 2,000 Guineas stakes— /or tvhicli she did not start — and the Oaks at Epsom — for which she icas not placcdj. But Tlie Times, when it touches on outside subjects, does manage to get hold of funny authorities. Still the author of " The Horse" has, in turn, been fol- lowed by a man who does know something of that which he is writing about — Mr. W. E. Welby, who says, as to the Royal grants, that " the best use for the money is to be found in the encouragement and improvement of hunter-getting stallions, as from sires of this class spring almost all our best riding, harness, and troop horses. But the diflSculty is to know how to make so small a sum (£3,465 for England) at all generally profitable. Distri- bution of it among local agricultural societies as a subsidy to their prize-lists has been frequently suggested, but to this there arc obvious objections. These societies are so numerous, and many of them so nearly on a par, that it would be most invidious, if not impossible, to select from among them, while without such a selection the grant would be simply frittered away in driblets. Again, many owners of valuable stallions dislike sending them to agricul- tural shows. The prizes there are generally concentrated on the one or two best horses exhibited, and a man will not send his animal when he knows there will be a better in the show- yard." It is many years since the sugges- tion for converting Royal racing plates into agricultural show plates was first, that is originally, made through the columns of The Marie Lane Express, and, despite Mr. Welby's protest, we adhere to an opinion, which has now found so much favour elsewhere. It is, however, only fair to hear Mr. Welby out, as to what would be hetter : " Discontinue the Queen's Plates. Let Governraeut THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 271 select haif-a-dozen of our railway centres — say, e. g., London, Bristol, or Exeter, Birmingham, Manchester, or some other Lancashire town, York, and Peterborough — and at each of these let £500 be given annually in len equal prizes of £50 each. This would leave £465 for ex- penses. Let the prizes be for the ten best stallions brought lor inspection, which shall fulfil certain specified condi- tions as to soundness, pedigree, and age, and which shall be at the service of the public at a limited price withiu a given distance (say 80 or 100 miles) of the town. Let the inspection be held shortly before the commencement of the covering time, and the payment of a premium made contingent on the stallion being available during the ensuing season, to prevent the money being wasted through his going abroad. Let no horse be eligible for more than one prize in a year. Have forjudges in each case a cavalry or artillery officer and a civilian, appointed by Government, with competent veterinary assistance ; let them attend at each centre on a given day, examine each horse submitted to them separately, and, when all had been examined, award the ten prizes to the ten most worthy competitors, without further classification ; and lastly, let the judges be changed every year, so as to avoid all suspicion of prejudice and favouritism. By these means, it seems to me, most of the sound and stout sires in the country would be attracted." Many of these proposed conditions as to limited service- fees, the prize horses standing in the district and so forth, have of course been offered over and over again, as in truth they are borrowed from the rules of some agri- cultural societies ; whilst Mr. Welby's objections to our plan apply equally to his own. If premiums be oflered, and these prove attractive, some of the horses exhibited must be better and some inferior ; while we are very con- fident that the business of judging would be much better done under the control of the agricultural society than if left in the hands of a cavalry officer and a government civilian 1 One so^iehow shudders at the very notion. Further, the choice of agricultural societies would not be a difficulty, simply because these societies are not " nearly on a par ;" and the very districts which Mr. Welby cites are already well provided with institutions which might be safely trusted with the distribution of these grants. Thus, " Bristol or Exeter" would naturally fall to the Bath and West of England Society ; " Man- chester or some other Lancashire town," to the jManclies- ter and Liverpool Society ; " York," to the Yorkshire Society ; " Peterborough," to the Northamptonshire Society; and Birmingham to the Midland Counties So- ciety, where the machinery is all ready-made, and where the benefit would be as mutual as direct. In place of London, where such a grant would have very little effect, one of these plates should follow the migratory movement of the Koyal Agricultural Society. There is more weight when Mr. Welby objects to " the risk of exposure for two or three days, or moi'e, to cold, or wet, or burning sun, the fear of accident, and other causes for misgiving," as we are inclined to think that a show of valuable horses should not extend beyond two days ; while if you smuggle the awards up in the time during which the cavalry ofllcer and the government civilian are at work, half the effect of the lesson, and half of the winner's advertisement must be lost. The strong line which we would draw should go against any of these plates being put under the control of people who go in for the jumping business — a practice which threatens to eventually disgrace our agricultural meetings as much as gate-money, hurdle-jumping, and light handi- caps have our minorrace-meetings. Of the Societies we have named the Royal, the West of England, theBirmingham and the Yorkshire donotoffer jumpingprizes, and others must re- form their ways before they can become qualified for stallion plates. The abuse has now grown to be something intoler- able; and at the last meeting of the Council of the Iloyal Agricultural Societiy of Ireland, Mr. Bagot proposed " That in future shows horse jumping shall commence at four o'clock, and that the only additional charge for admission shall be to the stand." Major Borrowes, in seconding the motion, said he did so in the hope that this was only a step towards the total abolition of jumping at the Society's shows. Sir Allan Walsh said there had been a great falling off in the exhibition of imple- ments at late shows, and he attributed that principally to the prevalence of horse-jumping. Colonel Vesey and several other members stated that they would rather have no show at all than have the horse-jumping con- tinued. Major Borrowes gave notice that at next meeting he would move that after the forthcoming show at Derry no horse-jumping be allowed at the Society's exhibitions ; and eventually a Committee was appointed to consider and report on the whole question of horse-jumping. All this speaks for itself, and if the Irish Society is really desirous of holding its ground as a national insti- tution, it must go with Major Borrowes for the total abolition of jumping at shows. NORTHAMPTONSHIRE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY, MEETING AT NORTHAMPTON. A certain special interest has come to be attached to the meetings of this Society, as, no question, the opeu classes of fat stock afford something of a trial for the ap- proaching Christmas shows. Thus, at Kettering last year, the best Shorthorn in Bingley Hall, in 1873, fore- sliadowed his subsequent failure by taking no prize ; while the best of the class had his position there something more than confirmed at Birmingham in two or three months' time, Avhere he was declared to be the champion beast of the Midlands. And of this ox we said, im- mediately on his being so distinguished, that he " hardly looks like a thorough-bred one, but is simply a great mountain of beef, of not very prime quality, while he begins with a poor, plain, mean head, and has as little style about him as any beast which ever took so high a place ; as, what with standing terribly in at his hocks, he is anything but clever from behind." And for saying so much against the champion we were called to account, perhaps a little too soon, by some "authorities!" The Organ complacently quoted T/ie Times tru " the grandest beast in the show," and went on to settle the question in a very off-hand manner : " of course the beast is a grand one, or else all the different sets of judges must have been wc fully wrong and Tke Mark Lane Express right." And within a few weeks or days of the question being thus settled the Birmingham champion ox was beaten again and again, directly or indirectly, by beasts which he had beaten in Bingley Hall. Moreover, in accordance with a very absurd and pernicious practice, which we have already exposed, Mr. Wortley has kept this animal on for another year, and so at Northampton on Thursday, at five years and some months old, he was brought out once more in the fat ox class. And all we have said of the Midland champion of 'seventy-three we 272 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. emphatically say agaia : he is simply a great or greater mouQtain of beef, as his size aud weight, over tweaty-six cwt., now only serve the more to bring out his defects — his lack of breed and style, his poor, mean, common head, and his coarse, faulty thighs and hocks. Naturally he showed signs of having been overdone, and could barely hobble under the burden of his fine broad back, bis one redeeming point. We seldom saw a worse show out, and not one of the judges would have him ; taking for first and best a younger and far more comely white, which was only second to the other last year at Oakham, but has since furnished capitally, and with the exception of being a little patchy behind came out very fresh, blooming, and ripe. And with two Shorthorn men in office they even went further, and for second prize selected a pretty, high-bred little Devon, whose want of scale and weight looked almost ludicrous as he braved the leviathans on the Pytchley race-course. The fact of Mr. Senior's beast finishing so forward did not say much for the rest of the class, but spoke more decidedly to the discomfiture of the champion, whose days should be numbered. The best in the younger class of steers was a thick, wealthy three-year old of quite Mr. Howe's type, but standing badly on his feet ; while Mr. Wortley was second with a really nice two-year-old, which so far has a deal more promise about him than the Tidy bargain, his triumphs notwithstanding. Mr. "VY ells' fat cow had better character, and more beef than the Moss Rose placed before her, aud the award was pretty generally regarded as a mistake ; but either of the two capital Shorthorn heiiers, which stood first and second in a small class, will be heard of again in better company. Maiden, indeed, has already distinguished herself about home, and JNIary Ann alas ! was the best heifer in calf or in milk at the Royal show at Hull and also at the West of England show at Plymouth in 1873. To look on from the near side, for he has his side, one can still scarcely comprehend how so true, stylish, and neat — in the best sense — a bnll as Telemachus could this season have ever been put below the white Irwin. With his length and depth, his rich coat, and his placid high-bred " expression," a pupil might study the modern Shorthorn from such a model, the more especially when put side by side with such afoil as Notley,and yet saythe judges on the ordeal by touch " that is a useful bull, too." Worthy of the Burghley hero, and, indeed, his only opponent for the extra premium, was Victoria Victrix, looking all the better as more level to the eye from having left her baby, just a week old, behind at Branches. And then there was Telemachus 6th, a far better youug bull than they thought him at Bedford, and Telemacina — if there ever could be such a title; and John Ward leading fortli one of his conquering Roses, though soon doomed to be more surprised than satisfied when he saw his high-bred calves actually beaten by a little bit of a Devon. But Roses, reds or roans, will flourish almost anywhere. The Devous finished first once more in a cow class of Shorthorns, against one of Mr. Sharpc's Julias, and so forth, aud people began to look on Mr. George Baker, of Luton Hoo, as a very strong man, matched though he might be against Mr. Bowly. There were other classes of more or less merit and interest, of which the prize-list may tell out the story ; though Mr. Clapton Wood supplied but an indifferent advertisement for his coming sale, and Captain Oliver was kind enough to put a chip of the old Dukes into the extra class, just to show the folks what a Shorthorn should be. The sheep were shown in very mixed classes, and some of the Longwools under the disadvantage of having got wet through in the heavy rain which fell in the Shires on Wednesday. A damp Lincoln is not an agreeable neigh- bour either to handle or look on, and so Mr. Gunaell's dripping theaves lost their place. It seemed to us that the different breeds were more confounded than should be at a show of the calibre of tlie Northamptonshire ; and it might be well if the classes were occasionally more clearly defined. It is not every man who can carry a Devon or Leicester against bigger animals, and Mr. George Turner kept his rams at home, atThorpelands. The strongest entry throughout was that of Lincolns, but some of the smartest aud most sorty pens in the show were the theaves and lambs sent by Mr. George Street from Maulden, of a really handsome Oxford type, while his brother's entries from Harrwoden were continually labelled as too late for competition, the railway authorities having failed to deliver the sheep in due season. The pig show was short, but with some strong names in the entry ; and here also, as when amongst the sheep, Mr. Tread well had to do "the best he could" against his Lincolnshire colleagues. In most places the meeting was a legitimate success, and the horse section, with plenty of competition here and there, opened with a capital class of cart mares, which took a deal of judging, so generally good were the entries; and an honest half or more appeared to be in it. The two premiums were eventually taken by the same breeder, Mr. Tomlinson, from oft' the Sutton marsh in Lincoln- shire, with a couple of mares which have been continually winning about the country, and for which it is said £400 the pair has been refused. We should rather go for the bay put second, a famous mover in her walk, as we hear that she has beaten the chesnut before now. The cart geldings and fillies ran up to only small entries, but with one or two very good amongst them ; and when we left it looked as if the riding horse business would go on to the end of the week. It was literally riding the horses, as each one of the three judges would get on the same animal, and we should be afraid to say how long it took to appraise a hunter class of some twenty odd entries, in which Marshal MacMahon had placed himself in tea minutes, although it took hours to get so far. It was simply anything for second, and this turned up in a flashy, white-legged chesnut from Husband's Bosworth, although there were better in the class, such as Mr. Whitehead's chesnut, a good third at Bedford, and a winner in Warwickshire the other day. Considering the fuss they made over it, the judging occasionally was very faulty, as amongst the three-year-olds they left out quite a Shire stamp of colt, shown by Lord Spencer and got by Dalesman, but probably " riding purposes" might suit any purpose a judge might turn this to ; although in the very next class, under precisely the same conditions, they put another Dalesman fitly enough first, but if Mr. Ken- ning's hunting colt had a right to be in, so most assuredly should have been Lord Spencer's entry. And then when the hackneys proper came in the judges threatened to ride everything, aud we fairly ran for it, having seldom or ever felt so sick of that noble animal — the horse. The tedium attendant on this sort of thing is becoming insuf- ferable, and would almost warrant the management iu going back to judging in private, and having the horses afterwards paraded in public. It is, however, only fair to say that in consequence of the show coming immediately on the St. Leger the management encountered in turn some fifteen refusals from horse-judges ; while so really good a man as Mr. George Higgins would look to have been only put on at the last moment, as his name does not appear in the cata- logue. The sporting farmers, led by Messrs. Drage and Saunders, did credit to the county, although they went mostly for made horses, the younger stock being often in- different. We do not despair of the jumping being abandoned at a meeting of the repute of the Northamp- shire ; and, as it was, this absurdity was very properly put off, as we have suggested, to the cheap or shilling day, THE FARMER*S MAGAZINE. 273 when of course fesv or no good horses take part in the performances. It will be seen how, at the dinner, Lord Speucer, a very able chairman, announced that the show in ] 875 will be held in Lord Exeter's park at Burleigh, and Stamford stand and course put, as we stated, to " more useful purposes." PRIZE LIST. JUDGES. — Beasts: E. Bowly, Siddingtoo, Cirencester ; G. W. Baker, Luton ; George Bland, Colby, Liucolu. Nak Houses : G. Higgins, Bedford ; F. Oldaker, London ; G. Hewitt, Drauglitou, Maidwell. Cakt Horses: T.TurDelJ, Irchester, Wallingborough ; ¥. J. Berry, Stanion ; R. Craw- ley, Meichbouroe, Bed'brd. Sheep and Pigs : J. Lynn, Stroxton, GrantliatQ ; E. Howard, Nocton Rise, Lincoln; J. Treadwell, Upper Wincliendon. Buiter: J. Hudson, Lndgate Hill, London. Implements: J. Craig, Fotlier- inghay, Oundle ; Gilbert JMurray, Elvaston, Derby; A. Hughes, Brampton Ash, Market Harboro'. Veterinary Surgeon : T. J. Merrick, Northampton. CATTLE. Fat Stock. — (Open to all.) Ox, exceeding three years and three months old on the 1st of December next. — First prize, £10, and a piece of plate value £5, Earl of Lonsdale, Barleythorpe Hall, Oakliam ; second, £5, T. Lee Senior, Broughton House, Aylesbury. Highly commended. Lord Spencer and E. Wortley. Steer, uot exceeding three years and three months old on the 1st of December next. — First prize, £10, J. How, Brough- toD, Huntingdon ; second, £5, E. Wortley, Ridlington, Up- pingham. Cow of any age. — First prize, £10, 0. Bennon, Cresswell, near Stafford ; second, £5, W. T. Wells, Witheru Hall, Alford, Lincoln. Heifer, uot exceeding four years old on the 1st of December next. — First prize, £10, R. Wright, Noctou Heath, Lincoln ; second, £5, 0. Viveash, Strensham, Tewkesbury. Commended, r. L. Senior. Breeding and Stoke Stock. Bull of any ate (open to all England). — First prize, i'lO, the Marquis of Exeter, Burghley House, Stamford ; second, £5, B. S. J. Ackers, Prinknash Park, Painswick. Com- mended: J. A. Mumford, Brill. Bull, above two years old. — First prize, £10. T. H. Bland, Dingley Grange, Market Harborough ; second, £5, H. Sanders, Brampton Hill, Northampton. Bull, above one and under two years of age. — First prize, £10, the Marquis of Exeter ; second, £5, J. J. Sharp, Brough- ton, Kettering. Highly commended : T. U. Sartoris. Extra prize of £5, tor the best beast in either the breeding or store stock classes. — The Marquis of Exeter (Telemachus). Bull calf, above six and under twelve months old. — First prize, ^10, J. N. Beasley, Pitsford Hall, Northampton ; second, £5, T. Simonds, Carter's Hill, Arborfield. Cow, in-milk or in-calf. — First prize, £7, T. Lee Senior ; second, £3, J. J. Sharp. Heifer, of any breed, in milk or in-calf, above three and under four years old. — First prize, £7, Lady Emily Pigot, Branches Park, Newmarket ; second, £3, Marquis of Exeter. Heifer, of any breed, in n.ilk or in calf, above two and under three years old. — First prize, £7, D. Dainty, Belmis- thorpe, Stamford; second, £3, J, Chaplain, Three Cliimneys, llidwells, Halstead. Heifer, of any breed, above one and under two years old. — First prize, £7, Lady Emily Pigot ; second, £3, G. Under- wood, Little Gaddesden, Hemel Hempstead. Heifer calf, of any breed, under twelve months old. — First prize, £3, T. Lee Senior ; second, £3, Marquis of Exeter. Short-horned heiier, above one and under two years old, to have been in the exhibitor's possession six months previous to the day of show. (Open to the above subscribers, and to all members of the society resident in the county.) — First prize, £10, R. E. Oliver, Sliolebrooke Lodge, Towcaster ; second £5, J. J. Sharp. Prize for extra stock, awarded to the Marquis of Northamp- ton.— Alderney bull. HORSES. Mare and foal, for hunting purposes. — First prize, £15, S. Middleton, Water Newton, Wansford ; second, £5, W. Kenn- ing, Bradden, Towcester. Commended; W. Faulkner, Rothersthorpe, Northampton ; C. W. Scriven, Willen House, Newport Pagnel. Mare or gelding, five years old and upwards, adapted for hunting purposes (open to all Eaa;landj. — £15, J. Goodlitf, Huntingdon ; second, £5, J. Sineeton, Husbands Bosworth Rugby. Commended: J. Drage, Moultou Lodge, Northamp- ton. Mare or gelding, above four and under five years old adapted for hunting purposes, bred within the county o- Northampton. — £-20 and second prizes, J. Drage, Moultonf Lodge, Northampton. Mare or gelding, above four and under five years old, adapted for liunting purposes. — First prize, £10, W. A. Harrison, Oxenden House, Market Harborough ; second, R. Horreil, Oakeley Beds. Commended : H. Sanders, Brampton Hill. Gelding or filly, above three and under four years old, adapted for riding purposes. — First prize, £7, J. Goodlitf, Huntingdon ; second, £3, J. Wiggins, Market Harborough. Gelding or filly, above two and under three years old, adapted for riding purposes. — First prize, £7, W. Kenning, Bradden, Towcester ; second, £3, J. P. Wright, Priors Marston, Daventry. Commended: J. A. Craven, Whiltou Lodge, Daventry. Gelding or filly, above one and under two years old, adapted for riding purposes. — First prize, £7, W. George, Gayton, Northampton ; second, £3, C. Cottrell Dormer, Courteenhall, Northampton. Commended : J. Goodliff, Huntingdon. Mare, not exceeding 15 hands 1 inch high, with foal at foot, for breeding hackneys. — First prize, £7, W. Catton Branford, Upton, Southsea ; second, £3, J. Cooper, Overstone. Commended : W. Linnell, Woodford Grange, Trapston. Hackney (mare or gelding), not exceeding 15 hands 1 inch high. — First prize, £7, J- G. Franklin, Shutlanger Grove, Towcester; second, £3, Lee Bevau, Brixworth-hall, North- ampton. Commended: J. Reeve, The Grange, Newnhara, Daventry. Cob (mare or gelding), not exceeding U hands 2 inches high. — First prize, £5, J. Wiggins, Market Harborough; second, £2 10s., J. Marsh, Benetield Lodge, Oundle. Com- mended : H. Sanders, Brampton-hill, Northampton. Pony (mare or gelding), not exceeding 13 hands high.— First prize, £3, Captain T. Wetherall, Loddington, Kettering ; second, £2, Rev. H. Stobart, Warkton Rectory, Kettering. Commended : J. H. Smith, Highcroft Lodge, Oadby, Leicester. Cart mare, with foal at foot. — First prize, £10, J. Tomlin- son, Lutton Marsh, Long Sutton ; second, £5, J. TomUnson, Highly commended : W. Colpman, Naseby Grange, Rugby. Commended : J. Ashby, Murcott, Long Buckby. Best foal in the class, the foal to be the progeny of the mare suckling the same. — Prize, £5, T. Marchant, Great Eastou Park, Leicester. Commended: Captain J. Borlase Tibbits, Barton Seagrave, Kettering. Cart gelding, above two aud under three years old. — First prize, £5, J. Walker, Newnham ; second, £2 10s., G. Street, Maulden, Ampthill. Cart filly, above two and under three years old. — First prize, £5, H. Burgess, Middleton, Rockingham ; second, £2 10s., T. H. Vergette, Borough Fen, Peterborough. Cart gelding, above one and under two years old. — Prize £7 lOs. (first and second prizes), R. Timms, Manor House, Braunston, Rugby. Filly, above one and under (wo years old. — First prize, £5, T. Messinger, Cold Higham Downs, Towcester ; second, £2 10s., G. Stops, Greensnorton, Towcester. SHEEP. Ten longwoolled ewes that have suckled lambs to the 1st June, 1874..— First prize £7 7s., T. W. D. Harris, Wootton, Northampton ; second, £3s. 3s., T. Gunnell, Willow House, Milton, Cambridgeshire. Five longwoolled theaves. — First prize, £5, J. Byron, Kirk Gi-een, Sleaford; second, £3 10s., T. Close, jun., Barnock Villa, Stamford. Highly commended : J.Byron. Commended: T. Gunnell. Five shortwooUed or cross-bred ewes, that have suckled lambs to the 1st of June, 187*. — First prize, £5, C. Barge, Weedon ; second, £2 10s., C. Barge. Five shortwooUed or cross-bred theaves.— First prize, £5, G. Street, Maulden, Ampthill, Beds; second, £2 10s., G. 274 THE FARMEE'S MAGAZmE. Street. Ilighly commended : JP. Street, llarrowden House, Bedford. Three shortwoolled or cross-bred shearhogffs. — First prize, £5, G. Street; second, £3 lOs., G. Street. Highly com- mended ; W. G. Duncan, Bradwell House, Stony Stratford. Three longwoolled shearhoggs. — First prize, £5, T. Close, jun. ; second, £2 10s., T. Gunnell. Shearling longwoolled tup. — First prize, £7, R. Wright, Nockton Heath, Lincoln ; second, £3. T. Close, jun. Highly commended : J. Byron. Commended : A. Hack, Buckmiu- ster, Grantham. Longwoolled tup, two-shear and upwards, that has proved himself a stock-getter. — First prize, £7, R. Johnson, West- borough, Grantham. — Prize, £3, &. Wright. Highly com- mended : R. Wright. Shearling Down tup, of any distinct breed. — Prize £5, F. Street. Five long-woolled wether lambs. — First prize, £3, T. Close, jun. ; second, £1 10s., T. Gunnell. Highly commended : J. ByroD. Five long-wooljed ewe lambs. — First prize, £3, T. Close, jun. ; second, £1 10s., J. Byron. Highly commended : T. Gunnell. Five short- woolled or cross-bred wether lambs. — First prize, £3, G. Street ; second, £1 10s., G. Street. ExTKA SiiEEP. — R. Linnell, Moreton Pinkney, Banbury, five shear, bred by the late A. Linnell, Crockwell tarin, Eydon, Banbury. PIGS. Boar of the large breed. — First prize, £3, M. Walker, Stockley Park, Anslow ; second, £2, R. E. Duckering, Nor- thorpe, Kirton-in-Lindsay. Boar of the small breed. — First prize, £3, R. E. Ducker- ing ; second, £2, S. Deacon, Polebrooke Hall, Oundle. Highly commended : J. Wheeler, Long Compton, Shipstou- on-Stour. Breeding or suckling sow. — First prize, £3, M. Walker ; second, £3, R. E. Duckering. Highly commended : M. Walker. Breeding or suckling sow of a small breed. — First prize, £3, J. Wheeler ; second, £3, R. E. Duckering. Highly com- mended : M. Walker. Three fat pigs of one litter, of any breed or age. — First prize, £3, M. Walker ; second, £2, M. Walker. Five breeding pigs of one litter. — First prize, £3, M. Walker ; second, J. Wheeler. BUTTER. Twelve pounds of butter, made up in two pound lumps, wholly or partially the production of Alderney cows. — First prize, £3, W. G. Duncan, Bradwell, Stony Stratford; second, £1, Lieut.-Col. Clarke, Welton Place, Daveutry. Twelve pounds of butter, made up in two pound lumps. — First prize, £3, W. Newitt, Bradden, Towcester; second, £1, J. Tew, West Haddon Lodge. Sis pounds of butter, made up in one pound rolls. — First prize, £3, J. Robinson, Courteenhall Lodge, Northampton ; second, £1, J. Wareing, Berry Fields, Daventry. Highly commended : W. Everett, Great Doddington, Kettering. Commended: S. Lea, Cransley Lodge, Kettering. IMPLEMENTS. A silver medal to Ball and Son, Rothwell, for collection of implements ; and tlie Society's medal for waggons and carts. The Society's medal for Coulta's improved press for corn- drill, exhibited by Ball and Son. A silver medal to Smith and Grace, of Thrapston, for their improved steerage horse-hoes. A silver medal to W. Smith, Kettering, for his turnip thinners. A silver medal for Barford and Perkin's steam tackle and elevator. The Society's medal to G. Lewis and Son, Kettering, for their improved sack elevator and shooter. The Society's medal to Marshall, Sons, and Co., Gains- borough, for improvement in engine and thrashing machine. The Society's medal to Hayes and Son, Stamford and Peterborough, for market cart. Very highly commended, A. Hughes, Brampton Ash, Market Harborongh, for patent laid corn-lifter attached to Samuelson's jeaper. Highly commended : Whitwell's patent warming and venti- lating fire grate. Commended : Burdick's self-delivery reaper, r>nd Kiiby'.s mower and reaper, exhibited by D. M. Osborne and Co., Fox-street, Liverpool. The Society's medal to H. Smith, Midland Carriage Works, Northaaipton, for Stanhope wagonette. At the dinner, Sir Rainalo Knigiitley, 'M.V., was glad to find that they had not been much troubled with the labour movement which they had all been watching with the greatest interest. He was very glad the struggle had terminated as it did. It was perfectly right that the poor man should endeavour to obtain the best price he could for his labour ; but if they had persons living at a distance and knowing nothing at all about the districts coming amongst them tnul dictating to the farmers what wages they should pay, it would be utterly im- possible for farming to be carried ou ; the greater part of the land would have to be laid down in grass, and only a certain number of labourers — a very few — could be employed ; and as these few would be the best men the others would have no resource but to go to the union. He did not want to see landlords deprived of their rents, farmers of their profits, or the deserving labourer obliged to go to the workhouse. The question then was what was the best way of meeting the difficulty, as it would inevitably ciop up again some time or other. What luid been resorted to in the Eastern counties was a perfectly legitimate mode of warfare ; the lock-out was the only means of protection the employer had against the strike. Both, however, were harsh and objectionable measures, \\hich should be resorted to as little as possible ; and the best way to avoid those measures was to endeavour to make the labourers as comfortable as possible. The best means of doing this was by letting them have comfortable, well-drained, and well-ventilated cottages, with allotments let at a moderate rent — this, however, was a landlord's question — and by the establishment of coal and book clubs as counteracting influences to the attractions of the public-houses ; while it was the duty of all those amongst them to employ the intellect and means with which they had been blessed for the amelioration of the condition of their less fortunate fellow-men. Mr. Pickering Piiipps, M.P., said the interest of the town and country were not all divided, and one ot the very best things for agriculturists was that they now obtained com- paratively high prices in consequence of the beef-consuming and bread-consuming power of the artisans in towns being increased by the prosperity of trade. All classes of which this country consisted had an interest in each other's welfare ; and the gteatest enemy to be fonnd in this country, in which all ought to be striving to do their duty to the Queen and constitution — the greatest carse was the man who went about striving to set class against class. The union had been tried and had failed, but there were two other kinds of unions — one which they should try to keep out of, the union workhouse, and the other which he should wisli all to try and maintain, the union of good fellowship and kindly feeliug. So long as the interests of the large centres of commerce were prosperous, so long would agriculturists be prosperous. But they must take care that their local burdens were not allowed to increase. He was quite sure that real property in this country — the land and houses — bore quite as much as it ought to do of the share of taxation, and he was glad to find that allowances liad recently been made from the Consolidated Fund for some pur- poses formerly looked upon as local, but now recognised as imperial. Lord Spencer, the chairman, regretfully alluded to the removal from amongst them, he was afraid on account of his health, of Mr. Owen Wallis, and to the recent death of Mr. John 13easley, who, not only as au agriculturist set them au excellent example in high farming, but who was at all times ready to give them tlie assistance of his valuable and wise counsels. He felt that he could to-day congratulate the Society on the success of its meeting. What they wished to do by means of these societies was to give the highest possi- ble examples of what good stock and horses should be, and also to show the most recent and useful inventions in the way of agricultural implements. In both these particulars they found as good examples in their showyards that day as could be found in the whole of England. They had in Telemachus an animalof which the county ought to be proud — au anunal who had travelled about England almost as much as the young THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 275 hero, from whom he got his name, travelled about the Gre- cian seas. And he understood that he had brought to his noble owner nearly £1,000 in prizes. They could not have a nobler example of what stock should be than in Teleraachus. So in the horse classes, they had had splendid specimens of what horses should be ; whilst implements for ploughing, carting, and other agricultural operations had been fully re- presented. When they saw the increasing space which was taken up by the implements it led them to reflect what a great change was taking place in the culture of land — in the mode in which it was cultivated, and in the population who lived on our soil. Seeing how much agricultural machinery was lessening the necessity for human labour, that their own obser- vation supported by the results of the last census indicated that there were fewer men engaged in the cuhivation of the soil than there were ten years ago. Another indication of this was to be found in the large number, of empty cottages in many of their large villages — a large village in his neighbour- hood having no less than fifty-two empty cottages, whichafew years ago were full of tenants. Though this was partly to be accounted for by the use of labour-saving machinery, yet there was another cause, and one upon which he thought they might congratulate themselves. The farmers and occupiers of the land were most anxious to get their labourers as close to their work as possible. Some years ago there were many places with hardly a single cottage on the farms, and the labourers had to go a great way to their work, and a great waste of power was the result. This had been largely obviated by the erection of cottages on the close parish, and the open parisli had lost many of its inhabitants. It was a great ad- vantage to the farmer ; and it was an advantage and an addi- tional comfort to the labourer, not only to find himself nearer to his work, but with a better house, and probably at a raiicli cheaper rent. What became of a large class who used to remain in our parishes, often to fall into idleness, and even- tually on the poor-rates ? Most of them he thought, went to tlie towns, and there got assistance in the shape of employ- ment from commerce and trade, to which the member for Northampton had referred in such sensible terms. This was a great advantage, but it pointed to the importance of their giving, as far as possible, a good education to the labouring classes. With steam cultivation and the employment of agricultural machinery in other operations of the farm^ they would need more education and intelligence in their labourers. And as to what he might call tlie surplus labour, that, if educated, would be enabled to gain an independent livelihood in the towns. They would see a yet greater increase in machinery, and a greater need for an intel- ligent and educated class of labourers. The result of recent changes had been to make a certain class of our labouring classes not satisfied with the lot in which they lived. He was not referring to this county, for here, as a lule, the agricultural population were in a satisfactory position. The labourers, as a rule, were well housed, and the farmers had met the demand for increased wages with liberality. No one would deny that in some parts of the country the agricultural labourer was in a wretched condition ; and he was not surprised that an en- deavour should be made to improve his position by combination. No one would deny that the agricultural labourer had a full riglit to combine; and in dealing with these matters, as Sir Raiiiald Knightley had justly observed, they sho\ild try to use the utmost forbearance and moderation. With regard to the strike and lock-out in the Eastern Counties, one side took matters with too high a hand, and were hardly justified in the demand they made. But still, on the other hand, extreme demands were made. A useful lesson would perhaps be learnt by both sides. Each party would see that the other could com- bine, and that in dealing with each other there should be the utmost forbearance and moderation. If they did this throughout the country he thought they would get rid of this difliculty of agricultural strikes. It was a necessary consequeuce of a popular movement that some men who joined it would use intemperate and violent language ; b'lt they ought not to repu- diate a whole movement on that account. Looking over some recent Government returns, he observed that there were more allotments in Northamptonshire than in any other county in England, save one — namely, the county of Leicester. There was a per-ceut;ige of 6-78 of the whole of the allotments in England to be found in Northamptonshire, the per-eentage in Leicestershire being 7- Ue attached great importance to this, because, altliough a labourer might not get much from his allotment, yet it gave him an amount of self-respect and inde- pendence which he vvould not otherwise have- If they by such means led their labourers to be self-dependent, and to rely on their own exertions, they would be less liable to become the victims of agitators who went about the country, and more likely to be reasonable with their employers. He believed that at this moment there was considerable prosperity amongst the agricultural classes of England. He believed they would find, when the returns were published this year, that there were more lands under corn crops than last year, and that the head of stock had greatly increased. He was sure they would receive the announcement with entliusiasm, and very heartily acknow- ledge the liberality of Lord Exeter — that as the Agricultural Society held its next year's show in Burghley Park, he desired to give certain special prizes. The prizes were exceedingly handsome and would do much to attract from all parts of Eng- land the best stock to compete for them. The noble marquis would offer a £100 prize for the best bull in the yard ; £50 for the best cow ; and £30 for the best pen of sheep. He added that if Telemachus were successful to-day — as he had been — he would give a further prize for the labourers. WARWICKSHIEE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT KNOV/LE. The entries of cattle were sixty-seven animals, against forty-three of last year ; and these were generally useful, but without any of great repute. The Shorthorns took the leading place, and the Longhorns the secoud ; the Here- lords, though prizes were olTered for them, being entirely absent. In the class for Shorthorn bulls over three years old, of live entered the two best were Puck and Earl of Warwickshire, both bred by Mr. H. J. Sheldon, of Brailes, but exhibited, the oue by Mr. 11. Pensou, and the other by Mr. J. W. Wilson. The judges differed as to which was the better bull, and Mr. Lynn was called in, and the premium was awarded to Mr. Wortley's fancy, appropriately enough here, as a Warwickshire noble. For two-year-olds Mr. Ackers took the first prize with Cym- beline. lu the Shorthorn bulls over 10 aud under 20 months, the first prize was awarded to Mr. J. J. Sharp, of Kettering; and for the second, Mr. Ro- bot ham, who took second at Tamworth, was beaten by Earl Beauchamp with Robin Adair. The next three classes were those for Shorthorn cows and heifers, aud among the exhibitors was Mr. Owen Benion, of Cress well, Stafford, whose cow, which was disqualified, as it is not in milk; and Mr. Sliarp took the first prize, the second going to Mr. W. B. Gibbins, of Eatington. The class for heifers under three years old, in milk or in calf, was poorly filled. The best was Mr. B. St. John Acker's Queen of the Georgians, which took first prize at the Worcestershire show. The seven heifers under two years old were better, Mr. Ackers taking the first prize with Lady Carew, and Mr. J. J. Sharp second. The only remaining Shorthorn class was that in which entries could be made to compete for the prizes of £23 and £7 ofl'ered by the local committee for the best Shorthorn hulls from any place in the kingdom, introduced into or bred in the neighbourhood, of not more than ten miles from the show, and to be kept for the use of tenant farmers in the district, at a price not exceeding £1 Is. per cow during the succeeding twelve months. There were only three competitors, and the prize was awarded to a red-and- white three-year-old, bred and exhibited by Mr. Thos. Walker, 276 THE) FARMER'S MAaAZlNl). of Berkswcll. Six animals were exhibited iu the three Iionghorn classes, of which four were the property of Mr. S, Forest of Keuilworth, aud Air. John Godfrey, of Wig- stou Parva. The entry chielly served to show that the breed is now falling away even in the IMidland Counties. The pairs cf cows for dairy purposes ran to six entries, aud the first-priz3 pair was that exhibited by Earl Beauchamp, aud the second by Mr. J. Dugdale, both being good. There was a class for pairs of dairy cows belonging to tenant farmers residing in the county, but the animals exhibited were of little merit. The show of sheep, as of cattle, was larger than last year. Mr. G. Turner, of Thorpelands, sent in some of his Leicesters, aud took the three first and three second prizes. The Cotswolds, a breed seldom found on farms in this district, was represented by Messrs. llayubird and Wheeler ; while Mr. T. W. D Harris, of "Wootton, North- ampton, took the prizes which were offered for "other" longwools. The Shropshire?, as at all shows in the Mid- lands, were the principal feature in the sheep department ; and the first prizes in the principal classes were set down to Mr. H. J. Sheldon, Mr. ^Y. Baker, aud Mrs. Sarah Beach. Mr. E. Street, of Bedford, was the only exhibitor of Oxfords, but with some very good specimens of the breed. Iu several classes the number of entries of pigs was small. In class for boars of large breed Mr. Hicken, of Dunchurch, took first prize, and Mr. Matthew Walker second. Small-breed boars were scantily-filled classes ; but in the Berkshire boar class the competition was keen, the show being large, and the quality of the animals high class, Mr. Heber Humfrey, of Shrivenham, Berks, sending a number. In breeding sows ]Mr. Hicken again won, as did Mr. Humfrey with Berkshires. The show of horses was but moderate. In the mare- with-foal class there were several animals which would have been better away There was only one entry in the cart gelding class above four years old, and although the com- mittee ottered a handsome prize for a pair of agricultural draught horses, there was no entry whatever. The hunters' classes filled much better, and there were some promising things amongst the four-year-olds. There were several weight-carrying hunters, Mr. Goodlilf, of Hunting- don, taking the prize of £40 with ^Marshal McMahon. The mares were an uneven class, and there was a great falling off noticeable. Hacks were fairly good, and there was a good show of ponies. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES. — Cattle: T.Morris, Maisemore Court, Glouces- ter ; E. Wortley, Ridlington, Uppingham. Agricultural Horses : T. Rush, Chalk Farm, Babraham ; S. Burchnall, Catton, Burton-upon-Trent. Hunters, Hacks, Ponies, itc. : Col. Luttrell, Badgworth Court, Axbridge, Somerset ; H. J. Thurnall, Royston. Siiee? ani> Pigs : J. Lynn, Church Farm, Stroxtoo, Grantham ; T. Horton, Harnage Grange, Salop. Implements: J. A. Beale, Brockhurst, Lutterworth. Cheese : P. Jacks, Leamington. CATTLE. shorthorns. Bulli above three years old. — Prize, £10, J. Wilson Wilson, Broadway. Highly commended: 11. Penson, Chipping Norton. Bull, over twenty months aud under three years old. — First prize, £10, B. St. J. Ackers, Painswick ; second, £5, T. H. Bland, Dingley Grange. Bull, over ten and under twenty months old. — Firbt prize, £8, J. J. Siiarp, Kettering ; second, £4, Earl Beauchamp, Madresfield Court. Cow, in milk, above three years old. — First prize, £6, J. J. Sharp ; second, W. B. Gibbous, Eatiugton, Stratford-on- Avon. Heifer, under three years old, in milk or in calf. — First prize, £6, B. St. J. Ackers ; second, £3, A. Robotham, Oak Farm, Drayton Bassett. Highly commended : Earl Beau- champ. Heifer, under two years old. — First prize, £6, B. St. J. Ackers ; second, £3, J. J. Sharp. Highly coiunieuded : J. A. Mumford, Thame. Bull, provided for the use of tenant-farmsrs within ten miles of the show, at a price not exceeding £1 Is. per cow, during the succeeding twelvemonths. — First prize, £22, T. Walker, Berkswell Hall ; second, £2, with £5 added, J. Dug- dale, VVroxall Abbey (Bismarck). LONGHORNS. Bull.— Prize, £5, J. Godfrey, Wigston Parya (Royal Charlie). Cow or lieifer, iu milk. — First prize, £5, J. Godfrey (Fairv) ; second, £3, S- Forrest, The Chase, Kenilworth. Bull, for breeding purpose?, of any pure breed. — Prize, £3, W. A. Battiue, Eathorpe Hall (Alderney). dairy CATTLE. Pair of cows in milk, which have been used in the exhibitor's dairy for the last two seasons. — First prize, £10, Earl Beau- champ ; second, £5, J. Dugdale. Pair of dairy cows in milk, belonging to a tenant farmer residing in the county. — First prize, £7, J. F. Paekwood ; second, T. Satchwell, Hearnfield, Knowle. EXTRA stock. Highly commended. — J. Dugdale (two Shorthorn calves). SHEEP. LEICESTERS. Shearling ram. — First prize, £6, and second, ^3, G. Turner, juu., Thorpelands, Northampton. Two-shear rams. — First prize, £6, and second, £3, G. Turner, jun. Five shearling ewes. — First prize, £5, and second, £2, G. Turner, jun. COTSWOLDS. Shearling ram. — Firse prize, £5, and second, £3, U. E, Rajnbird, Basingstoke. Two-shear ram. — First prize, £6, H. E. Raynbird ; second, £3, J. Wheeler, Long Compton. Highly commended : U. E. Raynbird. Five shearling ewes. — No entry. OTHER LONG-WOOLLED SHEEP. Shearling ram. — First prize, £5, and second, £3, T. W. D. Harris, Wootton, Northampton. Five shearling ewes. — First prize, £5, T. W. D. Harris. SHROrsHIRES. Shearlitg ram. — First prize, £6, H. J. Sheldon, Brailes House, Warwickshire ; second, £3, S. C. Pilgrim, Hinckley. Highly commended : S. C. Pilgrim. Two-shear ram. — First prize, £6, W. Baker, Moor Barnes, Atherstone ; second, £3, S. C. Pilgrim. Highly commended : B. Long, Middleton. Five shearling ewes. — First prize, £5, Mrs. Sarah Beach, Penkridge ; second, £2, S. Wilkes, Brewers' Oak Farm, Shiffaal. OTHER SHORT-WOOLLED SHEEP. ShearHng ram. — First prize, £5, F. Street, Harrowden House, near Bedford. Five shearling ewes. — First prize, £5, F. Street ; second not awarded. Tup, the property of a member, and to be used this season in the county.— Prize, £2, E. Lythall, Radford Hall. EXTRA STOCK. Highly commended : H. E. Raynbird. PIGS. Boar of the large breed (except Berkshire), under 18 months old. — First prize, £3, J. Hicken, Dunchurch ; second, £2, M. Walker, Stockley Park, Anslow. 13oar of the large breed (except Berkshire), above 18 months old. — First prize, £3, C. Benson, Grove Farm, Knowle ; second, M. Walker. Boar of the small breed, under 18 months old.— First prize, £3, M. Walker; second,£2, J. Wheeler, Long Compton. Boar of the small breed, above 18 months old. — First prize, £3, M. Walker ; second, £2, J. Wheeler. I3oar of the Berkshire breed, under 18 months old. — First prize, £3, H. Humfrey, Kingstone Farm, Shrivenham ; second, £2, M. Walker. Boar of the Berkshire breed, above 18 months old. — First prize, £3, J. Spencer, Villiers Hall ; second, £3, G. C. Green- way, Ashorae. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 277 Breeding sow, suckling pigs of lier own farrow, and in milk, of the large breed (except Berkshire). — First prize, £3, J. Hicken, Dunchurch ; second, £2, C. Benson, Grove Farm, Knowle. Breeding sow of the small breed, suckling pigs of her own farrow, and in milk. — Only one entry ; prize withheld. Berkshire sow, suckling pigs of lier own farrow, and iu milk. — First prize, £3 and second, £3, H. HumlVey. Three breeding pit;s of one farrow of 187i, of large breed. — First prize, £2, M. Walker. Three breeding pigs of one farrow of 187+, of small breed. ■^Only one entry ; prize withheld. Til ree breeding pigs of one farrow of 187i, of Berkshire breed. — First prize, £2, H. Hnrafrey. Sow of any breed sucklinfr pigs of her own farrow, and in milk. — First prize, £3, J. Hicken. HORSES. AGRICULTURAL. Stallion.— First prize, £15, T.Statter, Stand Hall, Wbitfield, Manchester; second, £5, Messrs. Yeomans, Four Aslies, Wol- verhampton. Highly commended : T. Tagg, Newhall, Burton- on-Trent. Mare, with foal at foot. — First prize, £10, W. Hulston, Ditchford Friary, Moreton-iu-the-Marsli ; second, £5, S. Abbotts, Arley Hall, Coventry. Highly commended : T. Russell, Lower Shuckborough. Gelding, under three years old. — First prize, £5, and highly commended, C. Burton, Temple Balsall. Filly, under three years old. — First prize, £5, S. Davis, Woolashill, Pershore. Higbly commended : W. Baker, Ather- gtone. Cart gelding, above four years old, regularly worked. — First prize, £5, T. T. Burman, Hockley Jieatli. Cart mare, above four years old, regularly worked. — First prize, £5, J. Dugdale, Wioxliall Abbey. Highly corameuded : 11. Timms, Braunstone. Pair of agricultural draught horses, regularly worked, the property of a tenant farmer, residing witiiia ten miles of the show. — No entry. HUNTFRS. Stallion adapted for hunting purposes. — First prize, £15, R. Hulton, Portman-square, London. Hunter ridden during the past season with the Warwick- shire, Atherstone, Pytchley, Bicester, Quorn, Lord Coventry's, Heythorp, or Cotswold hounds. — First and second prizes, £15 and £5, W. Whitehead, Woolaston, Wellingborough. Com- mended : A. llobertson, Banbury. Huater, four years old and upwards. — First prize, £15, J, Hicken, Dunchurcu ; second, L. Riley, The Outwoods, Meriden. Weigiit-carrying hunter. — First prize, £40, J. Goodliff, Huntingdon. Higlily commended : R. Hutton, London. Mare, best calculated to produce weight-carrying hunters, the property of a Warwickshire farmer. — First prize, £4'0, J. E. Bennett, Bosworth Grange, Rugby. Commended : H. Green, Hatton. Four-year-old gelding or filly, adapted for hunting purposes, the property of a tenant farmer residing witbin the limits of the Warwickshire or North Warwickshire hunts. — First prize, "W. Mann, Brookhampton. Half-bred two-year-old colt or filly, the property of and bred by a member. — First prize, £3, J. Griffiu, Burton. Higiily commended : W. Tyler, Birmingham. Mare best calculated to breed hunters, with foal at foot, the property of a member of the Society. — First prize, £5, T. Watson, Wliitacre. Weight-carrier, equal to no less than 15 stone, the property of a Warwickshire larraer, and that has been hunted during the past season. — First prize, £5, L. Riley, Meriden. Hunter, hunted during the past season, the property of a tenant farmer. — Only one entry. No award made. HACKNEYS AND POMES. Hackney, exceeding lilteen bauds.— First prize, £10, W. T. Stanley, Leamington. Hackney, not exceeding fifteen hands. — First prize, £10, Major Quentin, Woodleigli, Cheltenham. Pony, above thirteen and not exceeding fourteen hands. — First prize, £5, W. S. Cooper, Hilmorton Paddox, Rugby. Pony, above twelve and not exceeding thirteen hands. — First prize, £5, W. Tyler, Birmingham. At the dinner Lord Leigh thought with the Earl of Yar- mouth that the department for horses was a weak part of tho show, but be iioped that exhibitions in future years would be more successful in that respect. He was pleased to learn that there liad been more competitors for the cottagers' prizes this year. It had often been said, and with justice, tliat it was most iraporiant that the labouring classes should have their cottages improved. He had visited that day some cottages in that neighbourhood which were setting a good example, and he was glad to see that the cottages generally throughout the country were being improved But while they were building new cottages, he did think that it was im- portant to give every encouragtment they possibly could to make tlie labourers themselves know bow to make those cot- tages comfortable. He knew from his experience that many cottages well built were miserably kept, and therefore he thought that encouragement given to cottagers to keep their bouses and gardens neat and tidy was a step in the right direction. Mr. MuNTZ, the chairman, said, in regard to the proposal which was made to amalgamate that Society with others, he could not see sufficient reason for it. He thought it would not be creditable to that Society to do so. There were many jiarts of the county that they liad not visited, lie was a be- liever in the usefulness of such societies as that, the primary object of which was the education of agriculturists, and as there wer"; parts of the county which bad not been visited, he thought that the work of the Society was not complete. They had felt the need in that neighbourhood of such a Society. They bad a small local society, and by bringing the county society tbere they should accomplish greater good than tliey iiad done. One of the great objects of the Society was to establish comcetitiou, which was an excellent means of improvement and of gaining infonnatiou. He only hoped that what was now done iu Knowle would be repeated in other parts of the county which had not experienced the advantages resulting from a visit of the Society. Several gentlemen had expressed to him the opinion that the Society had done its work, and was getting antiquated, and that it would not go ou much longer ; but if they vppuld only put tlieir slioulders to the wheel the AVarwickshire Society would not die, and he hoped it would live much longer thau be should. He was in favour of a meeting of the associated societies ot the counties, and no one would be a greater sup- porter of such a meeting than he, but he should, at the same time, like every county to maintain its own independence. Mr. C. N. Newdegate, M.P., felt that in the presidency of ilr. Muntz tliat day they had a union of all opinions in the cause of agriculture, which boded well for the success of that association, and it was creditable to the temper of good old Warwickshire. The agricultural interests had been ex- posed to storms, as they all knew, during the last four years. Social didiculties — tliat was, difficulties between employers and employed — be believed were passing away, thanks to the steadiness, the good temper of all classes employed in agri- culture. There was an agitation, justifiable at first, but which some intended to urge beyond tiie legitimate objects of that movement. Those engaged in that agitation began by doing some good, but he thought tlipy bad shown that they meant mischief. The effect of that had been to draw closer toge- ther the landlords and tenants. He believed also that the effect of this movement was this — that the agricultural la- bourers, who were induced to believe that there were ready cultivated Edeus [open for them iu foreign lands, bad learnt that, though they were free to leave tiie country, still the homes tliey would find abroad were some of them colder, some of them hotter, and some of them less enjoyable than the homes they would leave behind. It rested with the land- lords and tenants to improve that feeling amongst their employes, and he recommended them to consult with those whom tliey did employ. If they expected intelligent service they must consult with their labourers. They would be dis- ajipoiiited if tliey jailed iu intelligence, and how could they give to them intelligence but by conveying to them their own. Let this leeliug pervade the agriculture of the country, any the difficulties that they had passed through would be for their good. In conclusion, the present Parliament had shown itself more ready to turn its attention in a practical and legislative sense to the requirements of agriculture than any Parliament of late years. 278 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. Mt. H. J. Sheldon referred to the system of over-feeding. He dare not, himself, at one of these exhibitions, show any animal above eighteen months old ; as he could not afford to feed up an animal worth £500, and not make him worth a £10 note. If that system were amended, instead of thirty or forty beasts being exhibited, there would be 500. A man could not be expected to be preparing an animal for a show for twelve or eighteen months, and then not be any use after. wards. As a practical man, he could not refrain from making these remarks. Mr. T. HoRLEX, jun., had been sorry to see the way in which the horses were worked. If any officers of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals had been present, they might have objected. With regard to the relations between employers and employed, the farmers owed a debt of gratitude to the noble-hearted men in the Eastern Couubies. STAFFOEDSHIRE AGEIOULTUEAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT TAMWORTH. The cattle numbered seventy-four entries, and con- sist of Shorthorns ; but the strength of the meeting is in the Shropshire sheep classes, which, however, are so re- stricted by the regulations that the best bree(5ers are unable to compete in many instances, and therefore several classes must not be taken as containing first-class speci- mens of the breed. It is time, says The M/dlancl Coun- ties' Herald., several of these regulations were expunged, as we observe that the committee do not even carry out their own rules in the selection of the judges, but ap- point members of their own body in the face of the fol- lowing, Eule 24 : " That the judges appointed for genei-al purposes shall be wholly unconnected with the Society." In the class for aged bulls the prizes were awarded to Hindoo Chief, a very promising two-year-old of Lord Shrewsbury, and to a large-framed white bull Duke, bred by one of the judges, and owned by Mr. F. Stanier Broade. For yearling bulls, Bloorafield, the property of Mr. A. S. Hill, M.P., was first, and Mr. A. llobotham's Red Rover second, the last named being purchased at the Bingley Hall sale in the spring, whence many other prize winners in the yard were obtained. In a large class of bull-calves Mr. A. Robotham was placed first, and Major Webb second with a calf of the Gwynne family. Mr. A. Robotham was again to the fore in the cow class, as the breeder of Miss Bloomer, the three-year-old shown by Mr. F. Cartwright, and also as the owner of the second-prize cow, Eleanor. In two-year-old heifers Mr. "Wolfertan was successful, aud Mr. A. Robotham com- pleted his list of honours by winning in the yearling heifer class with a pair of reds of his own breeding. In the classes for cattle for dairy pui'poses, Mr. Joseph Bickford, of Moseley Hall, Bushbury, was the most pro- minent competitor. i\Ir. F. Cartwright's red Shorthorn heifer won as a fat beast, and also as the best Shorthorn iu the yard, though closely pressed by iloss Rose, a fre- quent winner. Mr. Harcourt Grifliu's two-shear Shrop- shire ram was first, and next to him Mr. S. C. Pilgrim's ram of the same age. Mr. Pilgrim also won with a shearling ram, beating a sheep of Mrs. Beach's, which obtained honours at Bedford, where Mr. Pilgrim's ram was unnoticed, one of the two judges acting on both occasions. Mr. Charles Byrd won with ram lambs, Mrs. Beach with ewes, Mr. Pilgrim with theaves, Mrs. Beach with ewe lambs, and Mr. Owen with wethers ; Mr. Coxou taking second for ewe lambs, and the other seconds for ewes and theaves going to Messrs. Thomas and Charles Smith, from the neighbourhood of Ashborne. There was a good entry in the classes for 20 ewes and theaves, for the former of which Mr. Thos. Wood was first, Mr. T. F. Cheatle second, and Mr. R. Wyatt, third ; and for theaves Mr. H. Lowe was first, Mr. W. Tidy second, and Mr. T. F. Cheatle third ; but it is quite possible that the awards in these two classes may be altered, as there were several protests talked of on account of the peculiar con- ditions under which the prizes were offered. The long-woolled sheep comprised three cross-bred Lincolns and Leicesters, from Mr. Robert Johnson, of Kirkiretou, who farms these prizes. The pig classes were short in number of entries, and Mr. Matthew Walker's pigs carried off every prize for large aud small white breeds and Berkshires to Stockley Park, with the exception of two second prizes for Berk- shires, which go to the Earl of Shrewsbury. There are just under 100 entries of horses in 14 classes, the competition being fair except for Suffolk stallions, which the Earl of Shrewsbury vainly tries to introduce to the district ; and the Clydesdale Young Lofty was once more first in the All-England class. The Earl of Lichfield is a successful exhibitor of working cart horses, and Mr. W. W. Riddell sends the best mare and foal. The nag horses were mainly from the immediate district. The implement trials were a failure, only a few ploughs, and a horse rake, and a haymaking machine, being entered, and of the ploughs not one was worked by steam. The only exhibitors of ploughs were Barnes, who showed implements made by Ball and Sons, Howard, and Ransome, Sims, aud Head; and Perkins, who exhibited ploughs of his own make. Prizes were given to Mr. Barnes for Howard's and Ransome's ploughs, and to Mr. Perkins for those of his own make. JUDGES. — Shorthorns A^'D Fat Stock : W. Nevett, Yorton, Shrewsbury ; J. Robinson, Clifton, Olney. Shrop- shire Sheep : T. Mansell, Ercall, Wellington ; J. Evans, Uifington, Shrewbury. Dairy Cattle, Lojjg-woolled Sheep and Pigs: E. Little, Lanhill, Chippenham; W. Toralinson, Bradley, Ashbourne. Agricultural Horses : J. Belcher, Moreton, Gnosall ; W. Power, Brancute, Staf- ford. Nag Horses : C. Randell, Chadbury, Evesham ; C. ililward, Moseley, Birmingham. Cheese and Butter : II, Smith, Wyastone, Ashborne; J.Swain, Leicester. Corn : J. H. Masfen, Tamworth. Implements : J. J. Rowley, Western Bank, Sheffield ; R. Craven, Uttoxeter. Roots : R. H. Masfen, Pendeford. At the judges' dinner, Mr. R. H. Masfen said, what he wanted was the opinion not of men whose farming was confined to the office, or the club, or the editor's room, but of practical men, and he would like to hear from the latter how stock was to be kept during the coming winter ; and if there were any gentlemen present who were iu favour of rearing stock from cross-breeds, he would like to liear their reasons for pre- ferring that plan to the use of pure-blooded animals. For his own part he hoped that the judges would stick to true type, and not award prizes to mongrels or to animals of doubtful lineage. He was interested in knowing whether there was any gentleman who would have the boldness to get up and say that cross-breds or mongrels produced superior animals to those which came from pure-breds. He was iu favour of rearing from pure-breds iu the case of Shortliorns, and be hoped nothing would be done to encourage those breeders ot sheep who put themselves forward as pioneers, but who reared from cross-breeds. It would also interest the company to know the views of Mr. Rowley and Mr. Craven with regard to the progress made by inventors and manufacturers of implements. It would, too, be in Mr. Hewitt's power to give them some very valuable informa- THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 279 tion with regard to poultry, and more especially with regard to breeding. If he did not mistake, Mr. Hewitt ouce told him at Rlarket Drayton that a goose from two pure-breds weighed twice as mucii as a goose got by cross-breeding. If that was true with regard to geese, it might also be true with regard to cattle and sheep, or to any other class of animals. For breeding purposes let the stock have as pure blood as it was possible to get. Cross-breeds might have great weight, but it should not be forgotten that they were great consumers. Mr. Kow'LEY claimed for the department of implements as great importance as attached to the stock classes. He was not prepared to endorse all the remarks of Mr. Masfen, for he did not think it was advisable to confine breeding for a series of years to one kind of animal. It was a very important matter to assimilate animals to soil and climate, for great failures sometimes followed the removal of animals from one district to another, especially if the districts were distant from each other. Close breeding was of less importance tlian assimilation to soil and climate. The question, " What were they to do with their stock during the coming winter? " was one which it was very dillicult to answer " Give them plenty of cake." He would like to ask whether there was any geutle- raan present who could speak from experience with regard to the use of the liquid manure-drill this dry season. He knew of one farmer in Oxfordshire who had this season used that drill with results so satisfactory that he had determined always to use it and never to use the dry drill again. He was also able to speak from his own experience with regard to the value of the liquid manure drill in raising turnip crops in dry seasons. Mr. Robinson thought that as he was a judge the less he said about his department the better. Mr. Mansell said Mr. Lowe had told them to give their cattle plenty of cake, but how conld that be made to pay with cake at £13 15s. a ton ? (Mr. E. Lowe : You can get it at £13 delivered.) Tlie question was, " What was wheat worth?" With wheat selling at £10 a ton, how could they afford to pay £13 for cake? No ; the best thing to do would be to mix wheat with cake and oat straw and otiier things, and feed tlie animals with it. Let treacle and water be poured over the wheat, and a capital food would be made for the winter; but it was absurd to suppose tliat I'armers could at the present time afford to pay £13 a ton for cake. He trusted that other gentlemeu present would take up this subject. Mr. Little said he had not sown turnips for the last fifteen years without using the liquid manure drill, and during the whole of that time until the present year he had not lost a " plant." This year they had no rain in his part of tlie coun- try from the 9th of April to the 10th of July, and the conse- quence was that the plant was attacked by the lly and then by the green aphis. He had some turnips which were as good as could be shown, but they were not a " plant." It was usual for him to begin about the middle of May and go on until about tills time. He could show a regular " plant" over the whole of his farm, but the black grub and the dry weather had been great enemies. The rough wind of Sunday week blew the plant by hundreds into heaps, and it was found that the grub had eaten them through excepting a small portion of the heart. Every man who grew turnips should have a liquid manure drill, with a well or pond, a pump, and all proper appliances. He endorsed all that Mr. Mansell had said with regard to using up their own produce as food for stock during the ensuing winter. With wheat at £2 a quarter, they could have nothing cheaper, and in fact there were some inferior qualities, like the Ilivett, which could be bought for less than £3 a quarter. When boiled, wheat made a very fine mucilage, and when mixed with oat-straw and hay it would make an excellent food, and save the growing of extra turnips. If they could only tide over the winter they might depend upon being able to get a good price for their stock. Every pound would be wanted to feed the population, and even if they had to go to a little extra expense some means must be devised for keep- ing the animals. They must make the most of every bit of hay and straw that they had. Mr. Mansell feared that coal was too dear to permit of the boiling of wheat. Mr. Evans thous'lit that the end would bo gained by soak- ing the grain for 3i hours. Mr. Little thought not ; it was desirable that the wheat should be made into furmety. Mr. Evans thought it no compliment to exhibitors to sup- pose that they would show cross-bred animals, though of course any man might sometimes make a mistake in purchasing. It might be taken for granted that a man who bred sheep or cattle would do so from animals of the right type and charac- ter. That principle would no doubt be recognised by the judges, but perhaps the less that was said on the subject before the show the better. He trusted that all the exhibitors would be satisfied. Of course those who won would be content, and he trussed that those who were unsuccessful would resolve, ike true Euglishmeu, to win another year. Mr. Johnson said they heard a good deal about modern breeds, but 35 or 30 years ago they used to rear animals which at this day would take a good deal of beating — a right good, honest, sound type of sheep, with good features and plenty of wool and mutton, and with a hardy constitution. They were sheep upon whose backs you might have jumped to ride. In that ueigh- bourliood they liad made the mistake of seUiug all the best ewes and taking the inferior animals for breeding. Mr. Tojilinson said he would be the last in the world to deprecate good breed, but he must say, as a dairy farmer, that you could not make cheese without milk, and it was frequently found that the more blood the less milk. He wished to im- press upon breeders that it was of importance to dairy farmers that tliey should have milk-yielding animals as well as true shape and quality. Hairy farmers must have cows which give milk fur eight or nine mouths in tlie year and not three or four months. He could not help thinking that of late, while they had cows of good breed, they had been deficient as milkers, and he supposed this was to be attributed to the fact that cows used for breeding had not good firm udders and liad not been accustomed to give milk for eight or nine months out of the twelve. There would be more satisfaction in purchasing pure Shorthorns if they could only give plenty of milk. Mr. Nevttt said breeders must be very particular in the choice of the bull if they wanted to get good milkers. Mr. Hewitt said many persons made the mistake of buying fancy poultry which had been kept up in small pens and were not of strong constitution, and turning tiiem out on to large bleak farms, expecting they would do as well as fowls which received careful attention from regular exhibitors. The fact was that an ordinary farmer could not grow show poultry and make it pay. They sometimes read of fowls fetching £3 10s. a pair, but how many pairs were sold at that price? When fowls were very high-bred they did not lay anythiug like so many eggs as birds less distinguished. Eor the use of the table simply there was nothing better than to get two first-rate birds of two breeds and cross them. As to geese, he thought there was no more useful bird for a working man with a ' family than the much-abused goose. If they took an Empden gander and a Toulouse goose, they would Vet a very much larger bird than by other parents ; but if they took a Toulouse gander and an Empden goose, the birds would be three or four pounds lieavier than with the sexes reversed. The Empdeu was white with blue eyes, and the Toulouse was a grey bird ; when crossed they produce a saddle-backed bird with a little brown on the thighs, the geese weighing lolbs., and the ganders ranging from ISlbs. to 261bs. If, however, they were to breed next year from the produce of the cross, the birds would not weigh more than 71bs. or Slbs., which was a wonder- ful fact. One great advantage in the case of geese could not be passed over : they lived to a greater age than almost any, other bird, lie once knew a goose which positively lived on the side of the same common for 42 years. Her mistress was ill upon a sofa, and the old bird laid her eggs at the foot of the sofa, and hatched two goslings when she was 43 years old. As a poultry judge the bird was placed before him, and he guessed it was about a quarter of that age. The wisest plan in breed- ing turkeys was to get the largest-framed hen possible, and it did not matter if the cock was not so large so long as it was strong and lively. It was well known that a turkey which weighed 28 or 3U pounds was worth more tiian four turkeys of half that weight, because almost any price could be got for birds exceptioually heavy. If farmers would breed from Dork- ings and liramahs and then kill off they would have as o-ood a fowl as possible for their purpose. Game was undoubtedly the best for tlie table ; and the best time to kill the pullets, if they wanted a luxury, was just before they lay. When a game fowl was reared with proper attention to the framework it carried more ffesh than any other kind. For 280 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. eggs they would cross game atul Malay, and then they would have eggs more like those of a guinea fowl than anything ehe. He repeated that if farmers tried to hreed faacy poultry on bleak lands without the care and coddling which they got Irom exhibitors they would get neither prizes nor profit. Mr. E. Lowe said the only legitimate cross for the table must have game on one side or the other. He had proved this fifty times. No rule could be laid down with regard to the keeping of fowls in exposed places. He oucetook with golden- peacilled Haraburghs all the prizes wliich could be ohtaiaed by one man, and the birds never roosted anywhere but under a h.edfte in a bleak field. Mr. Maxsell : It is quite clear there are no foxes in your country. Mr. Hewitt thought Mr. Lowe had misapprehended him. He said that if fancy birds were taken from a place where they had been coddled up, and were turned on to a bleak farm, they would be of no service ; but if the efrgs were bought and the chickens were acclimatised they would do more good. THE RUMOURED REFORM OF THE GAME-LAWS. TO THE EDITOR OF THE MARK XANE EXPRESS. Sir, — Kemcmbering that many of the members of tlie present landlord administration, and the great majority of its supporters iu Parliament — thanks to the tenant-farmers of England— are game-preservers, and having due regard to the rumour which is afloat, that it is coBtemplated by Disraeli and Co., in the next session, to legislate upon the game question, it is pertinent, I think, to ask, through your columns, How is such a ministry, backed up as it is by such supporters, likely to deal with such an important subject ? And before the question is answered, it is to be hoped that many of your readers will well consider (1) what the Game-laws are, and (2) what they are accountable for. Of this there cannot be a doubt, namely, that these laws are of feudal origin, and still retain a feudal character. By the common law of England game is the property of the occupier. But then comes in the operation of what the landlords of England call " free contracts ;" and under these \cry jjrecioKs " free contracts" the occupier is universally coerced into contracting over to his landlord his lawful right to possess the game. The game is thus "freely contacted" over to one who knows no better wisdom seemingly than to oppress if not to " kill the hen which lays the golden eggs," and who, judging by actual facts, does not think that he has any interest whatever in keeping game withiu reasonable bounds, or his tenants from being despoiled by it ; and if the enforcing of such con- tracts for such purposes means anything, it means simply the exercising of a power which is unreasoning, reckless, imperious, arbitrary, and entirely feudal in its nature. In the second place, the Game-laws, when taken in connection with the preservation or over-preservation of this form of vermin upon the occupier's crops, and in despite of his consent, are a serious tax upon the said occupier, and, by the human food which is partly de- stroyed and partly consumed by the refcrred-to vermin, ultimately a serious tax upon the consumer — in other words, upon the nation. This tax, too, is imposed in the face of the fact that foreign food to the annual amount of some £140,000,000 sterling, which is vir- tually an impoverishment of Great Britain to that amount, requires to be imported to supplement the inadequate supplies annually grown at home. By all this a sample is shown of what our Earmers' Friends and " old nobility" are capable of, for sake of self-indulgence, or of what they term " sport" ! — that is, sport at such a sacrifice pecuniarily, at the expense of so much destruction to the tenants' crops and to the people's food ! In days of yore, when " he took who had the power, and when he kept who could," the feudal lord openly levied what was then called black-mail and what vas really a plunder tax upon his inferiors. This was long ago declared to be oppressive and illegal, and as such put down by Government by force. Under, the preservation of game system, however, what is virtually the same thing as was the levying of black-mail has been revived, and he who at the present day either preserves game upon his tenants' crops, through means of an enforced contract, or re- ceives a game-rent of his farms in addition to an agricul- tural rent, is doing neither more nor less than levying black-mail upon his tenants and inferiors under another name. And, in the third place, the Game-laws are car- ried out at the expense of a violation and suspension of the British Constitution, inasmuch as by the Game- laws Amendment Act, commonly known as Sir Baldwin Leighton's Act (certainly it was not the Act of the majority of the British people), any ordinary policeman, 071 the merest suspicion, or even in the gratification of private malice, is empowered, of his own accord, to seize upon and to search any of her Majesy's subjects on the highway. He requires no magisterial warrant or autho- rity whatever for doing so. Such is a part of the Game- laws, such an Act is the insolence of a class, and such is the Christianity, or the flunkeyism, or the moral coward- ice of the people, or whatever else the supineness may be called, that the said insolence has been hitherto quietly, calmly, and tamely submitted to ! It is under these cir- cumatances, be it remembered, that the present landlord Ministry, with the aid of their game-preserving majority in Parliament, propose to reform the Game-laws! and it is hoped and supposed by the said landlords and game- preservers that the British lion will neither " roar nor lash his tail" under the infliction of the sort of game- law reform which need only be expected from such legis- lators— legislators, as already said, returned as their repre- sentatives by the highly-educated and intelligent body of English tenant-farmers. The above, however short it may fall of the whole truth, is a description of what the Game-laws are. With your kindly permission I will, in a future letter, endea- vour to describe what these iniquitous laws are account- able for. Your obedient servant, Thomas Robertson. Narragmore, Athy, Sept. \Wi. THE NORFOLK COUNTY SCHOOL.— The pile of build- ings erected at Elmham has just been opened for the accoramoda- of 300 boys. The style of architecture adopted is described as Old English Domestic. The buildings are substantial and commodious, but there is little, if any, superflaous ornament, and the contract price of £8,000, for which the erection of the entire structure was undertaken, has not been exceeded. The exterior of the building is of red brick, with flint dressings, and with large dormers at intervals. All the timber work, externally and internally, is stained and varnished. There is a hall on the ground floor whereadistributionofprizeswasraadebytheRev.J.L. Brereton. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 281 THE IMPEDIMENT TO AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT. TO THE EDITOR OF THE SiK, — "We are a loyal people, not given to sudden changes, but strongly attached to old customs, which is a safe and proper desire vfithin certain limits ; but we resisted the introduction of railways, and most of our great towns repented when too late ; we smashed up the first power-looms, spinning jennies, and thrashing ma- chines ; and it took us thirty years to make us believe in the potato. Jethro TuU's drill and horse hoe required half a century, and the Rev. Patrick Bell's reaping machine quite as long, before it was partially used, and even now the reaping maciines are by no means general. The steam plough is working its way slowly, but it will re- quire at least another century before town sewage and human voidances are appreciated and utilised. The hedge- row system and roaming at large of animals, and the at- tachment to plenty of poor permanent pasture, slowly give way to arable land and a more profitable practice. My neighbours took twenty odd years to believe in the iron fold hurdle on wheels, instead of cheap wooden ones, and it will be fifty years before a fixed engine will be con- sidered indispensable on every arable farm of 200 acres. Landowners, tenants, and labourers participate in this loyal attachment to old things and old practices, but it a sad bar to rapid advance. We want more food, much more home-grown food, so as to keep our money at home, and our people employed in producing it. This, I know from thirty years of observation and practical experience, can only be done by giving up some of our ancient but now unprofitable agricultural attachments. I frequently converse with landowners and land agents who are desirous to improve land, but the great difficulty is to get tenants willing to pay a fair interast for such im- provements, and invest the necessary increased tenant's acreable capital. On the other hand, intelligent wealthy farmers lament that their landlords cannot or will not make the necessary landowners' improvements, or give, by lease, a valuation for such improvements when made by the tenant at his own cost. In backward districts there is an unfortunate satisfaction with things as they are, and a want of belief in modem agricultural innovations. In such a case it becomes necessary for the landowner gradually to lead the way, and also to exercise a mild despotism as the late admirable Mr. Coke did. Twenty- seven years ago the late Sir Robert Peel expressed to me his difficulties in this respect, and why he could not suddenly " convert" certain tenants. When the itinerating meetings of the Royal Agricultural Society found their way to be- nighted bat very self-satisfied districts, how it astonished ttie natives to see the old plough worth £5 superseded by Fowler's £3,000 plough, and the old flail represented by a j£450 thrashing machine ; as the song said, " What an alteration !" Liebig in his Morleni AyricuUure, p. 198, gives an amusing instance of strong prejudice when red clover was first introduced into Germany -. " The Birken- feld peasants of last century grievously complained that Government wanted to compel them to cultivate a foreign weed (clover). They told the officers in the plainest terms ' to stick to their lasts,' and concern themselves about things they had learned. As for husbandry, they (the peasants) were likely to know much more about it than all the margraves and overseers in the world. They did not wish to give the matter a single trial, and when ultimately compelled to sow the clover, they demanded, after a time, a magisterial inspection of the fields, and showed ' that not a leaf of the clover had come up.' And no wonder, for it turned out at last that the peasants had boiled the seed before putting it in the ground. In our day scientific principles are treated MARK LANE EXPRESS. somewhat in a similar manner, the professors of modern agriculture boil them in their pot, and it is theu openly shown that not a grain has come up." Many do not know that at one time— before the in- troduction of clover, root crops, and oilcake— we had no roast beef at Christmas ; for, as soon as the grass failed, the fattened beasts were killed to prevent their becoming lean, and were then salted. The past history of agricul- ture is interesting as showing how gradually we have become civilised, "and also points to still further changes than have yet taken place. I am, therefore, justified in foreseeing the time when we " clever" people of the prt- sent shall be looked back upon as " the lights of other day 5." I am a believer in imp.-oved agricultural education combining theory with practice. It will dispel much of the fog of doubt and disbelief. The intelligent farmers who have emanated from the Royal Agricultural College at Cirencester, atFord ample evidence that the multipli- cation of such institutions in every county of Britain would be of vast benefit and encouragement to a more enlightened and more profitable use of the soil. Our landowners would be none the worse for an education in modern agricultural principles. They would then, con- currently with their tenants, adapt their fields, roads, and buildings to the modern requirements of the steam plough, the covered yards, and the modern shecpfold, which render hedgerows and trees unnecessary. The evidences of non-education are painful, and na- tionally disgraceful. None of my men of 50 can read or write. When two of Fowler's great ploughing engines came on to my farm last week, and brought their " house," in which four men and a boy reside, I otfered them news- papers to interest them in their leisure hours, but none of them could read, except the boy ! That made a deep and painful impression upon my mind, and I said to my- self, '■ Ignorance cannot be bliss." Two farmers in my neighbourhood (one deceased) could neither read nor write, though successful men. The edu- cation movement has come none too soon, for it is the general education of the American people that has, in the brief period of their independence, enabled thein to excel by far in enterprise, and equal in wealth, their British parents; but then they have more than 120,000 public schools and collei^es, &c., an 1 32 agi-icultural colleges to our poor " one." Each agricultural college has a farm of 400 acres attached to it. The American people and their Legislatures are keenly alive to the importance of educa- tion in its relation to the business of life. Not quite so with us, for I have heard many a wealthy farmer say that education would spoil his best meu. The Americans have 67,000 miles of railway against our 16,000. I am quite aware that I have been, and perhaps am now, considered by my " practical" brother farmers " a torment" to agriculture, never letting old things alone, and disquieting the agricultural mind; but so strong is my conviction of the necessity for progress in the art of filling the British stomach (the most important of all the arts), that the short period still allotted to me shall, D.V., be a continuance of my determination in the good cause oiFnu/ibus vita al'itur, which is the motto on my armo- rial bearings at the Herald's College, believing that my eft'orts are for the good of my country and of my brother agriculturists. Your?, Tiptree, August. J. J. Mechi. 282 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. BUSINESS HOURS AND BUSINESS HABITS, TO THE EDITOR OF THE MARK LANE EXPRESS. Sir, — ^Vlly do so few well-educated city young men turn to agricultural pursuits as a business ? and those country-born turn from their fields, and find their way to city and town, to otRce and warehouse ? Is it because these are more inviting than the sweet fresh valleys and bracing hills ? Scarcely so, for the summer holiday is anticipated with pleasure because of the oppor- tunity to get away from the smoke and din. Is not the reason to be found in t'.:e fact that, as a class, farmers and corn and flour factors are not so business-like in hours and mode, but conduct thiir affairs in a muddling old- world style, particularly irksome to those who possess the faculties of promptitude and method ? I speak more particularly of buying and selling as conducted amongst the middle-class country traders. To illustrate my mean- ing I will give an instance which I witnessed. A farmer had some wheat for sale, and called on a neighbouring factor with the sample : time, soon after dinner. Well, he made various remarks on weather, markets, aud so forth, dis- cussed at some length the mode of his neighbours' farming, how many times a certain field had been used for a certain produce in so many years, which was "altogether wrong ;" then the manner of fattening his cattle was brought forward, but not a word about the wheat. He was asked to take refreshment, and decanters were introduced ; after which he was increasingly eloquent upon what " ought to be done" by others. "Well, I thought, how long is this to last ? The afternoon sped on. At length the sample \\as produced, and much praised ; but no price asked. His customer was asked " what he would give for such a fine lot ?" and of course, the figure did not suit. Some perfectly irrelevant subject was started, which occupied his reasoning powers till nearly five o'clock ; then came, " Well, shall I send in the wheat ?" " Oh, not at that price ;" he objected, and thought and thought again, shook hands, walked to the end of the premises, and in another fifteen or twenty minutes decided to take the i)rice. Three hours over one transaction ! and this is not by any means unusuil. Another objection to the country mode is people coming on business are brought into the family room. Now, there are many persons who meet ui often in business whom ice cannot take as friends, and would not wish our wives or sisters to ; why then intrude upon them, at any hour, men— -possibly plainly evidencing a recent visit to cowshed or piggery — whom they cannot be pleased to associate with ? Their city cousins are not subjected to such annoyances, and their expressions of dislike doubtless influence the young men to choose a different profession. There should be neutral ground for business trans- actions. Every mill and farm should have an ofiicej so as not to disturb that sweetest blessing of home — privacy, without which home is but a name. Much discomfiture is often brought upon a family where there is no provision of the kind. A tradesman has his shop, the accountant his office, and so on, and certain hours. When closed, the public know that they must wait for re-opening ; but in the country at any hour from 6a.m. to 10p.m. the miller, at least, must be open to his customers' calls. And, in consequence of the style of doing business already noticed, the family are also deprived of the privileee of feeling free from intiusion, which sometimes is most inconvenient. Many feel this, and take steps to have it different ; but it is regarded almost as an absurdity, aud they are esteemed as being above their business ; something, as the old Scotch guJe wife considered ber neighbour who had taken to clean her house, " So ower proud to want her floor clean soopit ; na such fash in the gude old days." But our business-like young people wish for a better mode of doing things, and if they cannot succeed at home they will try elsewhere, leaving many who aie unable to wish they could do likewise. Yours, A Miller's W^ife. AUSTRALIAN WINES. It is not very probable that the wines of Traufc, Spain, and the Rhine will be surpassed, or even equalled by any competitors, near or remote; but however ample the re- sources of existing vine\ards, it is certain they cannot keep pace with the constantly-increasing demand produced by the rapid growth of our wealth and its accompanying habits of luxury. An opportunity has been afforded at the International Exhibition, held at Kensington, for the growers throughout the world to enter into competition ; and in addition to the wine from the wine countriesy;^/-^?.):- celltnce, the public have been enabled to form an acquaint- ance with the vintages of Italy, Hungary, Greece, Sicily, Australia, and even America. This collection possesses considerable interest, for it has not been possible hitherto to bring together such a variety as may be seen in the limited space afiorded by the cellars of the Albert Hall. The older wine countries of Europe have up to quite a recent period produced all the wine consumed in England, and the advantages attached to the sale of such un- doubtedly excellent products has retarded the introduc- tion of any less known or favoured. There is enough, however, in this exhibition to show that no spcciality°of climate and soil exists, and when viticulture shall have become sufficiently established elsewhere, the monopoly enjoyed by them at the present time will not remaia alto- gether unchallenged. The success of the samples of Australian wines that have been tested at Vienna, and again in the British me- tropolis, has encouraged the belief amongst the colonists of Australia in the capabilities of their country to produce a good drinkable wine. By competent judges, who have made it their business to traverse all the principal wine dis- tricts of Europe, it is asserted that in Australia many millions of acres may be found, which, from their situation, as regards climate, aspect, and soil, are especially adapted for the culture of the grape. Superior advantages may be derived from the seasons, which are not so uncertain as in Europe, whilst the fruit obtained is equal to any in the world ; and with experience in the different niceties during the manufacture, it is confidently anticipated that an article can be produced that will be in no way behind many of the productions of Europe. The progress of the vine since its introduction is worthy of atteutiou, as it may hereafter form an important eleinent in the material resources of Australia, already so rich in mineral, vege- table, aud animal products. The first vine was planted in the valley of the Murray by German settlers, who were struck by the resemblance THE FABMER'S MAGAZINE. 183 ia the locality to their owa native Rhineland, aad the success attending this first attempt led to the whole of the hills and slopes around being transformed from rough wild bush into blooming vineyards, orchards, and gardens. The example of the Germans was followed by British settlers in this part of the colony, aud an iudustry un- known twenty years ago now extends over a distance of one hundred and fifty miles along the banks of the Murray River, yielding abundant crops, and producing various wines known in the market as " Murray wines." l*Vom this original stock cuttings were transferred to Victoria, whilst in South Australia certain other enter- prising settlers were introducing the varieties of plants derived from the wine districts of Spain, Portugal, and France, accompanied by foreign labour to superintend their growth. Both as regards variety of stock and of locality the vine, therefore, has been tolerably widely diifused, and only awaits the encouragement of the public to make it a substantial and remunerative industry, as in every probability it will hereafter become. Under the disadvantages attached to a modern culture in an article that has been matured in the greatest possible perfection in Europe, even at the present time the wines of Australia, comparatively speaking, show much promise. In cha- racter some closely resemble the Rhenish, while others approximate more to the finer description of white Portu- gal, and the old wines of the Rhine. Amongst the grapes that have been found by experience to produce the best white wines are the Riessling, which, although not a large bearer, is always a hardy vine, aud the fruit is less liable to damage from wet before vintage than other kinds. The Verdeilho that produces a fine bouquet, the Aucarot, the Chasselas, a hardy plant, aud the Pedro Ximenes. Amongst the red varieties preference is given to the Shiraz, Maalbec, Carbinet, Burgundy, and Ronssillon. The difficulties attending the first cuUivatiou of the vine were far greater than in the case of any other natural product. There were difficulties in the choice of the soil, the kind of grape, the mode of planting, the making of the wine, its treatment and transport ; and it must be borne in mind that although the colonies possess every variety of climate and soil obtainable in any of the wine producing countries, yet they have not been fully tested or even reviewed as to their capabilities. The vines best suited to each locality are yet by no means clearly ascertained, and the system of making wine must for some time longer be experimental. The earliest in- troduction of the vine took place about the year 1850, and statistics show that South Australia in 1871 possessed 6,131 acres of well-established vine- yards under culture, in which 5,783,674 vines were bearing and 385,081 unbearing, and from which 801,691; gallons of wine were produced, and 8,584 cwts. of grapes sold. Next in order was Victoria, which had in 1872- 5,523 acres under cultivation, in which were planted 9,671,292 vines, producing 713,609 gallons of wine and 30,896 cwts. of grapes. In the same year Nevv South Wales possessed 4,152 acres, producing 413,321 gallons aud 508 tons of grapes sold, besides 607 acres of vines unproductive. The whole extent of laud occupied by the vine exceeds therefore 16,000 acres, and the production nearly approaches two million gallons. At the outset the prejudice in Australia agiinst the home-grown wines was very great ; but the consumption, which is principally colonial, has increased to such an extent that the article has a prominent place in every household, and far exceeds the ordinary imported wine. By acting as a check upon the use of ardeut spirits, perceptible effects have been produced upon the morality of the people, particularly amongst the rising generation. Before the introduction of Australian wines, the majority in the colonies, especially the working classes, drank no- thing but strong rum or brandy of inferior quality, and the effects of the unrestricted consumption of these liquids had become most demoralising. But owing to the resources possessed by the manufacture from the pure juice of the grape, a very sensible change for the better has taken place in the habits of all classes. The labourers now prefer colonial wine, which can be procured at a cheap rate, instead of bad spirits. The decrease in the imports of foreign wines shows clearly that similar pre- ference has been given over the stronger fortified wines imported from Europe. The vine may therefore be re- garded as a salutary instrument to further the rural progress aud consequent prosperity of the great island- continent of Australia. It is to be ho[>ed that when the Australian wines be- come better known and more generally used that they may commend themselves to the British public. There is said to be something new in their fiavour, not to be fouud in the strongly fortified kinds of Spain aud Portugal, and the purity for which they are now condemned may cause them hereafter to be liked and appreciated. The success of the vignerons will depend upon their own appreciative faculties, and the awards of jurors, so far satisfactory, must be followed by the verdict of the great body of the consuming public. The high rate of alcoholic properties produced by the climate are found lo hinder their importa- tion into this country under the lower scale of duties accorded to the French clarets, and we shoiUd gladly wel- come any adjustment that would foster these distant efforts at viticulture ; but at the same time much might be urged upon the Australian colonists upon the subject of reciprocity in commercial tariffs. FARMERS' POLITICS IN SCOTLAND. At the Tarland show dinner Mr. M'Combie, M.P., said : I am certain every one here has the interest of the tenant- farmers at heart, and, as I only wish to speak on their behalf, I am sure that even those gentlemen who are on the oppo- site side of politics will favour me with a fair bearing. 1 trust it may not be out of place in a meeting of farmers wliose interests are identical to make a few observations with regard to the past, and onr present and our future prospects. In the few observations I sliould wish to make, I will make no difference as to the Liberal or Conservative interest. Neitlier shall I speak on any subject that had not the con- currence of the CouservHtive CHndidates at tiie last election, and the concurrence of my bonourable opponent at tlie late contested election in West Aberdeenshire. A great number of our large landed proprietors supported Mr. Edward Ross, and are compromised to his utterances. I should be sorry to say one word as to their consistency, but in speaking a few words as to our common interests, to which the Con- servative members pledged themselves at the late election, and on questions where we all agree, I trust my remarks will not be offensive to any one. Now it cannot be denied, and it is deeply to be regretted, that the late Government did less than nothing for the tenant-farmers. There is no doubt we were deeply injured, for it was to the Scotch counties they mainly owed their majority. Now, what was the result ? The farmers at the late election resented the injustice, turned out tlie Liberals, and put in the Conservatives. The old Liberal members of the Scotch and English counties had generally to give plaje to Conservative candidates. The Conservatives are now in power, with an everwhelmiog majority at their backs. How have they redeemed their pledges ? The Scotch Conservatives who turned out the Liberal members pledged themselves to repeal the Law of Hypothec, virtually to re- peal the Game-laws, to give compensation for unexhausted 284 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. improvements, and to abolish the gun and shepherds' dog-tax. The English farmers were promised repeal of the Malt-tax, security of tenure, and compensation for improvements. How have these solemn pledges been fullillpd ? Not one of these measures has even got a hearing. We have got no redress for our grievances. But an influential member of the Con- servative side of the House, professing to be a tenant-farmer and the tenant-farmer's friend, introduced a bill — the Rabbit Bill. [ had nearly forgotten about it. It was just a new Game-law in disguise. The members of his own side of the House were so much ashamed of it, that after the few re- marks I made in proposing that the bill be read a second time that day three months, which was so ably seconded by my friend Sir George Balfour ; without further discussion the bill was withdrawn. And this is the only measure that has been brought before the House by the Conservatives for our relief. Now, as to Mr. Vans Agnew's Hypothec Bill. From week to week we found it on the paper, but as the session advanced it was always further down, and the last time there were twelve important measures before it. To do Mr. Vans Agnew justice, 1 do believe he wished to pass his bill, and at the beginning of the session he had strong hopes of it being carried, but a great opposition arose against it by a few in- fluential Conservative members, and their influence prevailed, and the bill never even got a hearing. I know more about the postponement of the bill than it would be prudent to mention. I was deeiily interested on the subject, and I do not blame Mr. Vans Agnew ; but this I may say, that it was shelved by a few noisy agitators, who wish to give no con- cession to the farmers. But the tenant-farmers will continue to press their tjuestions, and if they are resolute and firm they will, I feel sure, obtain from the country the justice which is due to them. The tenant-farmers will, I believe, be offered a sop, viz., the repeal of the gun-tax and the shepherds' dogs tax next session. But will the tenant-farmers accept of this sop ? No. We will only take it as an instalment, but we will support the repeal of all such obnoxious taxes. The tenant-farmers were indebted to the right hon. gentleman, Mr. Lowe, for the gun-tax, the shepherds' dogs-tax, and many other good actions during his imperious reign. But it is my belief that, except compelled, the majority of the Government are not particularly anxious to redress our main grievances. The truth is we have been completely sold by the late Govern- ment, and still more egregiously by the present, for they pledged themselves more deeply than the former. Now I should wish to put it to the tenant-farmers, " How long are you disposed to allow the present state of matters to go on ? Are you to sit down and rest on your oars under such in- justice staring you in the face? If you do not bring your members to book during the recess for the gross injustice you have received at their hands, you are not the men I believe you to be. You have the matter in your own hands, and you will have yourselves to blame if you do not assert the influ- ence of your position." I can safely say, speaking for the tenant-farmers of Scotland, that if the present Conservative members don't redeem their pledges — " it is as sure as death " — that at the first opportunity their services will be dispensed with. It is but justice to say that the farmers have a few friends in the Government, but they are puzzled and over- weighted by other members of the Government, but the great farce has been principally played out by the wirepullers be- hind the curtain, who are determined to give no concessions that they can prevent to the tenant-farmers. The Marquis of Huntly said the suggestions of Mr. M'Combie were such as every landlord should take specially to heart. He wished to say upon his own behalf, and he was certain on behalf of most of the landlords upon Deeside, that they would certainly freely give to the tenants the right they claim, if they would show that they were right. He went a great length with Mr. M'Combie, and was clearly of opinion thrt there were some things which the Legislature would do well to set right. There were gentlemen who differed from him, and some in a way that sometimes amused him. Of this stamp was the writer of a letter in the Aberdeen Journal, signing himself "Donside," who made several pointed references to himself a splaying off aerated politics in the north. Without taking further notice of "Donside," he advised him to make himself master of his subject before he commenced writing about it. The writer dealt out a good deal of abuse on him (the Mar- quis) for naming the Enclosure Commissioners as unpractical people, and was evidently unaware that this present moment no landlord could move hand or foot without the Enclosure Com- missioners of the Court of Session. Landed proprietors under the Law of Entail, who wished to do anything on their property and to charge the property a reasonable rate for it, cannot do so without going to the Enclosure Commissioners or the Court of Session, necessitating a long and expensive process. At the New Deer cactle show dinner, Provost Leslie, pro- prietor of Netherrauir, said the constituency of Aberdeenshire were favoured with two most excellent members, who stood true to their colours and faithfully performed the promises which they made. The present company were, doubtless, better acquainted with Mr. Eordyce than he was, and knew well the attention he paid to his duties, while his kindness and urbanity to every one was of the most laudable nature. On questions affecting agriculture, Mr. Eordyce was in Parliament always to be found on the side of progress, and the speeches made and measures produced there spoke more forcibly of his worth than he could. Mr. M'Combie was a tried man, who had done very much to raise the character of Agriculture in Aberdeenshire. His name was not only well-known in this district, but in England and abroad, as a successful rearer of cattle, and he had helped more than many to advance that great interest upon which so much depended in Aberdeenshire, namely, the rearing of fat stock, which brought so much revenue into the country. In all Mr. M'Combie had done he had shown himself to be a good man and a true. Mr. M'Combie did not speak often, but always spoke with effect on subjects which he understood, and when he did speak he was listened to with attention from both sides of the House. Mr. FoKDYCE, M.P., spoke in high terras of M'Combie's worth, both as a Member of Parliament and a colleague. The past session has been exceeding devoid of interest when looked at from an agricultural standpoint ; and from his own experience of the present Parliament, he thought that the tenant farmers of Scotland had very little to expect from it. They might possibly find that collie dogs might be exempted from taxation, and that the occupiers of land would be allowed to destroy wood pigeons and crows free from the necessity of taking out the gun licence, but as for any thorough revision of the Game-laws and land-laws, he feared they would look in vain. For himself he expected more from the gradual formation of public opinion and its influences upon the minds of the landowners, apart from legislation. He had read with great interest the discussion in the Chamber of Agriculture, and the report upon leases of Patrick Murray, of Ochtertyre. It seemed to him that the terms of these leases furnished a good basis for securing the tenant farmers of Scotland in the benefit of the capital which they put into the soil, apart from legislation. He was of opinion that if this suggestion was carried out by the land- owners, the land question would be practically settled. Unless the law of entail was abolished such form of lease would be inoperative in many cases, because many proprietors could not afford to pay large sums for improvement. He meant, however always to urge upon the membersof the Government the neces- sity of having the law of entail abolished. The bill which he and Mr. M'Combie had brought before Parliament this year and which, like many more bills, had to be withdrawn, he had good reason to believe that if it had gone on he would have, received the support of the majority of the Scotch members. It seemed surely a reasonable proposition, and very moderate, that where the tenant had to build additional houses for his accommodation, if he did not get compensation for them at the end of the lease, he should be allowed to remove thematerial ; and that where labourers' cottages did not exist for every 100 acres of land cultivated, and where the tenant supplied the deficiency, he should be allowed for every cottage found suit- able by the Sheriff of the county, £100 of compensation. These propositions were embodied in his bill, and he thought they were not only fair and just, but very moderate. If any- one cared to read the evidence of Mr. Caird he would find that that gentleman was much dissatisfied with the labourers' cottage accommodation, and brought forward the fact that on two-thirds of the farms in Scotland the working classes were living in houses deficient of the requisites of decency and comfort. Such statements were to a great extent the means of inducing him to bring in the bill, aud he intended to peg away at it till he got it carried through. It liad been said that when bills were first brought into Parliament they were laughed at, secondly they were abused, and thirdly carried. He thought his bill had pasBcd the ^rst stage at least. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 285 THE AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS OF IRELAND, FOR 1874. To HIS Grace James, the Duke of Abercorn, K.G., Lord Lieutenant- GENERAL and General Governor of Ireland. May it please your Grace, — I had the honour of sub- mitting, on the 31st ultimo, a return by counties of the acreage under flax in the years 1873 and 1874, with the num- ber of scutching mills in 1873. I now beg to submit the annual general abstracts, which give, as usual, by counties and provinces, tlie entire area under each description of crop ; also the total number of liorses, cattle, sheep, and pigs, and tlieir estimated value. The collection of the Agricultural Statistics, wiiich commenced on the 1st of June, occupied about two mouths. Tile enumerators, of whom nearly 3,800 were employed, were selected from the Royal Irish Constabulary and Metropolitan Pohce, and, I need scarcely observe, discharged this duty with their usual efficiency. The various holdings, which amount in all to about 600,0()0, were visited by them, and the names of the several parties from whom the particulars of tillage and live stock for each holding were obtained, are stated on the returns, with a view to further inquiry in any case, should it be found necessary. Your Grace is aware that the information given to the enumerators is altogether volun- tary ; and I feel assured it will afford pleasure to your Grare to learn, as, I beg to say, it is most gratifying to have it in my power to state, that so far as I am informed by the officers wiio acted as superintendents of districts, the returns have been collected without difficulty — a fact highly creditable to the good feeling and intelligence of all ranks and classes connected with land in this country. In all Irelaud there was this year only one refusal to give the required information reiiorted by the enumerators; but on my writing to the party, and sending him blank forms for tillage and stock, as I have for many years been in the liabit of doing in similar cases, I in a few days re- ceived the returns filled up, together with a very courteous reply. The abstracts have been carefully compiled from sum- miries made by the enumerators for their respective districts. They may differ in some degree from the revised figures which will be hereafter published ; but I do not apprehend that any clianges of importance will become necessary. Acres. The total acreage under all crops this year was 5,267,839 Ditto in 1873 (revised numbers) 5,270,746 Showing a decrease in the extent under crops in 1874of The crops which increased in extent this year are — ■ Acres. Acres. Cereals P^''"^"^ ^''^^'^^ *^"^*'' iBereandrye 639; r Mangel and beet-root 65 J Cabbage 4,930 2,907 21,796 Green crops < ^ ° '""■ j","i""-> ' '^ I Carrots, parsnips, and other 7 q ijL L green crops ) ' Meadow and clover 8,119 67,835 ^otal increase on the foregoing crops 97,750 The crops which decreased in acreage in 1874 are — Acres. Acres. rOats 30,786) Cereals -5 Barley 18,769 [■ 51,026 (.Beans and peas 1,471 J (■Potatoes 10,841-) Green crops -J Turnips 14,361 [■ 27,220 (.Vetches and rape 2,0183 Total decrease in the foregoing crops 100,657 Making a net decrease in the area under all crops of 2,907 It appears from the foregoing summaries that, compared with 1873, wheat shows an increase of 21,157 acres, here and rye of G39 acres, mangel and beet-root of 65 acres, cabbage 4,930 acres, carrots, parsnips, and other green crops of 3,124 acres, and meadow and clover 67,835 acres. In oats there is a decrease of 30,786 acres, barley of 18,769 acres, beans and peas of 1,471 acres, potatoes of 10,841 acres, turnips of 14,361 acres, vetches and rape of 2,018 acres, and flax of 32,411 acres. Abstract of Green CROfS. Wheat Oats Barley Bere and rye..., Beans and peas. 1873. Acres. 167,554 1,510,972 230,115 9,224 12,873 1874. Acres. 188,711 1,480,186 211,346 9,863 11,402 Increase in 1874. Acres. 21,157 Decrease in 1874. Acres. 30,786 18,769 1,471 Total 1,930,738 11,901,508 — 29,230 Decrease in cereal crops in 1874 29,230 acres AssTBACT OF Green Crops. 1873. 1874. Increase in 1874. Decrs. inl874. Acres. 903,262 347,848 38,231 28,115 31,590 23,417 Acres. 892,421 333,487 38,296 33,045 34,714 21,399 Acres. 65 4,930 3,124 Acres. 10,841 Turnips 14,361 Mangel Wurzel & Beet Root Carrots, Parsnips, and other Green Crops Vetches and Rape ... 2,018 Total 1,372,463 1,353,362 — 19,101 Decrease in Green Crops 1874 .19,101 Acres. General Summary of Cereal AND G REEN Crops, &c. Decrease in Cereal Crops in 1874.. ...29,230") Do. Green Crops I'las do. .. ...19,101 [ 70,742 Do. in do. .. ...22,411) Increase in Meadow and Clover in do Total decrease in the extent of Land under Crops in 1 ... 67,835 874 2,9n,j- ^^ en I-- CO co . M CO <» Ci 03 O ^ -*" en CO lO (M pqc-i H <5 CO C5 CO CO ^ 60 -J<" lO lO Tf o -^1 C-* ^ ^. r~'^^ r^^- ,~^>^ /■^'^ r^-^ l^-s. ■ c^ o en -t< CO lO OO o> t^ ^-< f -+■ CO o o CO .o ira OO '^ (« a CO CD CO o CO CD a o " ^ en CO t^ o ^ t- « CO o a ■< C< C) lo csi ai in CO -f CO CO CO 70 -2 .9 3 r-H~— T i-n'r-T ^ !* H oj a „• • 00 M r-< CO -Jo CO CO ^ a EM r— 1 lO CO lO Tt< OO 1 -# t~ ^ o S r-. CO CO CO lO t- ^1 feTTo ao..co_ mo* i-H CD_ co"co" co'c*" > 5 t-co ■* CO T?^ O m r-H CD t-t^ to „; (N Tf< tr-OO lO CD Oi^*— J. to fXH^ tft O CO CO en o> O CO Ol o O CO CO ^coco. CM » r-1 t~ o t- a> C^ —1 t— CD w =o -<-^^^ ot « OO OO t^C^ CM lO F— ' l-H 1 — 1 -^ — (—1 •O lO 'o CO •* CO •+ CO •+! CO -»< CO rr t^l-- t- C-- M 00 OO OO OO OO OO OO OO 1— t ( — 1 r— I 1 — t r— < ^-1 r—*r—i « v^,^ ^r^ v^^^ "^'^ v--.^ o "S 2 r* a ■ ^ 3 n a '^ '■, O w M H p "i jl a> rt H H < f^ H Ph K P S 1 ^ u The acreage under the head of " Bog and "Waste niioccu- pied," had not any Live Stock on it at the period of the enumeration. 286 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. The area under the several Crops in each yea- from 1S70 to 1874; inclusive was as under : Cbops "Wheat Oats Barley Bere and Rye Beans and Peas Potatoes Tiimips Mangel and Beet Root Cabbage Carrots, Parsnips, and other Green ( rops.. Vetches and Rape riax Meadow and Clover.. 277ri 29869 31196 .31590 34711 2790" 31-422 30172 23417 21399 191910 156670 121992| 129297 1068S6 l773Sol ,1829041 1800273: 183 s248 1906083 Returns or Live Stock. It appears from the following Table that the Returns of Live Stock for 187-1' when compared with 1873 show a decrease in the number of Horses of 6,377, in Cattle of 28,989, and in Sheep of 46,907 ; and an increase of Pigs amounting to 52,040. The following are the numbers of Live Stock for each year from 1864 to 1874., inclusive : Tears. I No. of I No, of , horses. \ cattle. 1864 562,158 1865 548,339 1866 535,799 1867 524,180 1863 524,703 1869 528,201 1870 532,657 1871 538,095 1872 540,974 1873 532,447 1874 525,770 Difference in Numbors| Deors beetwen 1M73 and 1874' 6,67 Incrs. 52,040 The total estimat-rd value of Horses, Cattle, Sheep, and Pigs this year, is £37,225,887, being a decrease of £228,392 vehen compared with 1873, as appears from the following Table : Estimated V.4.lue of Live Stock in Ireland in each Year from 1864 to 1874, inclusive, calculated according to the rates assumed by the Census Commiissioners of 1841— viz. : For Horses, £S each ; Cattle, £6 10s. ; Sheep, 22s. ; and Pigs, 25s. each. [These rates have been retained since 1841, in order to facilitate a comparison of the value — one j-ear with another. A per-centage may be added by any one at pleasure on account of the increased value of live stock since that period.] Years. 1861.. 1865.. 1866.. 1867.. 1868.. 1869.. 1870.. 1871., 1872,. 1873,. 1874.. Difference in") !)„„.„„„„ value between } f^l.fl ' 1873 and 1874J ^-^-llib Horses. £ 4497264 4386712 4286392 4193440 4197624 4225608 4261256 4304760 4327792 4259576 4206160 Cattle. £ 21204911 22734062 24350020 4100719 23704174 2426888S 24699428 25846418 2G386081 26956163 26767735 Sheep. Pigs. ^^*^l Dec. £188128 £ 3703635 4063792 4701710 5319071 5361646 5116314 4770572 4656779 4689579 4932972 4801374 Dec. £51598 £ 1323100 1632441 1871593 1543989 1086972 1352780 1826519 2026779 1735714 1305568 1370618 £ 30728910 32817007 35157219 34380416 34380416 34963590 35557775 36834736 37139166 37454279 37225887 Inc. Dec. £65050 £228392 Scutching Mills.— Tlie number of mills for scutching flax fn each province, in 1873, was — In Ulster, 1,335 ; Leinster, 29 ; Munster, 33 ; Connaught, 30 .making in all 1,427. Emigration-. — In the first six months of 1873 the returns of emigrants from the several ports of Ireland show that 60,140 persons left this country. The number for the same period in 1874 was 45,781, being a decrease of 14',359 persons in the first half of this year. coW w s ^ o HU C5 M 'A Pi H r> R n K R P- < n H A M Pm O a ?•, < P H H o rt in rH O ■* as . .CO O t^Cf* in fig • :-.ii CO en lO t- t^ 1— 1 M CO m o m !>• -* . CO CO c^ o CO >0 C5 ■* • C5 a, w d cS Ph < t-i H < Ci l-H 0"« in jj H O tr~ B O I-H Tf( CO t~o 00 eo Ph CO r— 1 oj l-H lO OO r-H CO t~ 00 O CO in o CO P fi C^ r-l in U 0 C* tH -+i CO OO CO r— 1 C* l^ O CO OS OO 1-4 C» ao OS CO M CO l-O c< t- OS 05 aj ' ' ', QJ HH J^ s -j5 t~-fi in 03 O 05 ^ ^ rt 05 lO l~-0 CD « CM c^ r-4 l-H (S l-H t~ oc< o mm-* t-CD tjj CO O lO 1— 1 c< CO ■* CD t~0 OO o rH CO""* r-H CJ •sti:jaop tr Jan.. Feb.. Mar. Apr. May June en THE FAEMEB'S MAGAZINE. 287 The entire number of emigrants (Irish) from Ireland, from 1st May, 1851 — the period wlien the Enumeration commenced —to the 30th June last, was 2,298,520, of whom 1,228,863 were males, and 1,069,663 were females. Laboureks' Dwellings. — It is impossible, both on social and sanitary grounds, to exaggerate the importance of im- proving the dwellings of the labouring classes in Ireland ; the Legislature has enabled the Treasury to grant loans for this most desirable object through the medium of the Board of Public Works, Dublin. According to the census of 1871, the number of fourth-class houses in Ireland, most of which had only one room for the entire family of every age and sex, was ascertained to be very considerable, and iu these were living nearly half a million of persons. Weeds. — Although very great improvement in the breeds and value of every description of farm stock has been etfected in Ireland, it must be admitted that a corresponding improve- ment has not taken place in the cultivation of the land. On several occasions I have felt it my duty to solicit public atten- tion to the incalculable injury arising from the unchecked growth of weeds which is, unhappily, permitted in almost every part of the country, and also along the sides of roads, rail- ways, and canals. On this subject 1 have now given extracts from former abstracts containing valuable information from the writings of Sir John Sinclair and other eminent persons, which I trust will prove useful to those engaged in the cultivation of land. I have also appended some extracts respecting the vast injury and great pecuniary loss (estimated at nearly two mil- lions sterling) caused by weeds in Ireland from that valuable publication, the " Leisure Hour," iu its number for May and June of last year, together with two articles on the subject which appeared in the " Freeman's Journal." At the annual meeting iu 1872 of the Royal Agricultural Society in Belfast, the noble President, Lord Lurgan, K.P., referred to " the necessity of acting on the suggestions thro^'n out in the reports of the Registrar-General in relation to the extirpation of weeds. They did a deal of mischief, and he thought they should carry out the sentence wliich the old Scotch law pro- nounced, declaring anyone to be a traitor who poisoned the queen's land with weeds." I again beg to repeat my respectful acknowledgments to the landed proprietors, tenant-farmers, the clergy of all denomina- tions, and to the public press in Ireland, for a continuance of the same generous and valuable assistance which I have now for so many years experienced in connexion with these statis- tics, I have the honour to be your Grace's very faithful servant, William Donnelly, Registrar-General. General 'Regisier Office, Cliarlemont House, Bubliii, Wth August, 187'I. A HONEY YEAR.— 1874 will be belter for honey than any of the six preceding years. March and the first half of April were very unfavourable for bees in this part of the country ; also the whole of May. This, together with the weak state of the hives, made swarming late generally. In June the weather took a more favourable turn for bees, which have been doing moderately well ever since. From a bee- keeping point of view, rain is much wanted in this locality ; we have had one shower only for many months, and that shower did not penetrate more than three inches deep. Here we have a thin peaty soil resting on twelve or fifteen feet of white 5and and gravel. Hence the fields are parched, and white clover is not yielding honey so pleiitilully as it usually does in similar hot weather. On heavier land, where clover is more plentiful, bees are doing better. Still, all are moving onwards ; swarms are filling their hives, and old stocks that yielded them are now pretty well filled with honey. We have turned out a lot of ours from which we get about 201bs. per hive of excellent honey. Though honey-dew appeared on sycamore and oak trees, the bees fortunately did not touch it tnis year. I am encouraged to believe that the honey harvest will generally be large throughout Great Britain and Ireland. Apiarians should take notes ol observations and results, and send them to the editors. The practical work of the bee- master is now to prevent swarming, by giving his bees room enough in ekes, supers, and nadirs. — Journal of Horticulture. THE GEOWTH OF EL AX IN IRELAND. Return, showing, in Statute Acres, the Extent under Flax in each County and Province in 1873 and 1874, compiled from Information obtained by the Royal Irish Constabulary aud Metropolitan Police, who act as Enumerators ; also the number of Scutchiui; Mills in each County and Province in 1873. Counties AND Provinces. Extent of Land under F'lax. 1873. 1874. Ulster. Antrim Armagh Cavan Donegal Down Fermanagh ... Londonderry ., Monaghan Tyrone Acres. 11,749 9,692 7,235 14,496 27,093 3,454 18,709 11,557 19,270 Total of Ulster 123,315 Acres. 9,182 7,907 5,741 11,417 22,367 2,526 17,360 8,691 17,592 102,789 MUNSTEK. Clare Cork Kerry Limerick Tipperary Waterford Total of Munster.. 253 993 296 42 15 3 1,602 267 720 246 41 9 1 1,284 Difference between 1873 and 1874. In- De- crease. crease. Acres. Acres. — 2,567 1,785 1,494 3,079 4,726 928 — 1,403 2,866 — 1,678 Decrease, | 20, 526 Number of Scutch- ing Mills in 1873. 157 123 34 273 249 28 197 65 209 1,335 14 1 — 273 50 Decrease, 318 2 23 2 33 Leinster. Carlow Dubhn Kildare Kilkenny King's Longford Louth Meath Queen's Westmeath .... Wexford Wicklow Total of Leinster, 6 1 1 1 5 4 30 20 540 379 1,012 588 230 56 1 1 54 43 20 9 — 5 1,905 1,113 1 4 167 424 174 11 11 Decrease, 792 29 Connaugiit. Galway Leitriiu Mayo Roscommon Sliso 103 44 59 1 460 382 78 1,132 839 — 293 i ' 272 119 — 153 j 508 316 — 192 Decrease, | 2,475 1700 77 a 30 1874. Acres. 106,880 1873. Total Acreage under Flax in Acres. Ireland in 1873 and 1874 129,297 Total Decrease in 1874 22,411 Total number of Scutching Mills in Ireland in 1873 1,427 288 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. Total Extent of flax grown in Ireland in each of tlie following years : Acres. 1S51 14.0,536 ]852 137,008 1S.J3 174.579 1854 151,403 1855 97,075 1850 100,311 1857 "J7,7:il 1858 Sn.OlG 1859 130,->8-3 1860 1^8 595 1861 147,957 1862 150,070 Arres. 1863 214,099 1864. 301,693 1865 251,4.33 1866 263,507 1867 253,257 1868 -206,483 1869 229,252 1S70 194,910 1871 156,070 1872 121,992 1873 129,-297 1874 106,886 The foregoing Return — which exhibits a Decrease of 22,4-11 acres in the totnl area under Flax in Ireland in 1874., com- pared with 1873 — is published, as in previous years, in antici- pation of the General Abstracts of Tillage and Live Stock. In the Province of Ulster alone the decrease is 20,526 acres. Of tlie entire number (1,427) of Scutcliing Mills in 1873, 1,335 were in Ulster, 29 iu Ijcinster, 33 in Munster, and 30 in Cuunauglit. 1 do not apprehend tliat any important difference will be found in the acreage under Flax given above, and that which will appear in the Tables of the General Abstracts, which are now being compiled, and will soon be published ; they will aive the acreage under the various crops, and also the number of Live Stock, by Counties and Provinces. General Register Office, William Do>'Nelly, Dublin, 31st July, 187i. Registrar-GeueraL THE LOCAL AUTHORITY IN SCOTLAND. A special meeting of tlie Local Authority for Atierdeenshire, under the (Jontagious Diseases Animals' Act, was held in Aberdeen, Sheriff Comrie Thomson, presidins^. Tiie report from the Inspector of the County, with rel"erence to the present state of pleuro-pneumonia, was read as follows : Aberdeen, 12th August, 1874. My Lords and Gentlemen, — Since my last detailed report on 10th April last, I regret to say that there has been 22 new outbreaks of pleuro-pneumonia. The following are the particulars of each of these outbreaks, so far as they are known to me : Pleure-pneumonia was declared to exist amongst the stock of i\lrs. John Walker, Blackpots, Old Deer, on the lllh April. The stock consisted of 63 animals, 38 of which have become affected and been slaughtered. The last case occurred on 7th July, aud the pi ice has now been cleansed and disinfected. Mrs. Walker purchase i a lot of Irish cattle in the.month of January last, aiuj there is little doubt but that they brought the disease along with them. That a great number ot the animals on this larm became atfected is to be attributed to the fact that a severe attack of foot-and-mouth disease liroke out at the same time ; free communication beween the byres also assisted to spread the disease. On 28th April, pleuro-pneumonia was declared to exist amongst a lot of dairy cows belonging to Alex. Singer, South Denmore, Old- inachar. Tlie stock consisted ot 14 animah, 12 of which have become affected and been slaughtered. The last case occurred on 2ist July. The owner purchased two cows from John Duncan, cattle salesman, Aberdeen, about the beginning of April, one of which became alfected first. Pleuro-pneumonia was declared lo exist at North Murcar, Oldmachar, occupied by Mrs. Beattie, on 28th April. The stock consisted of 9 animals, 3 of which have been slaughtered. The last case occured on 16th July. The farm adjoins South Murcar where disease previously existed, aud unless the animals on the two places came in contact, the cause of this outbreak is not apparent. Pleuro-pneumonia was declared to exist amongst the stock of Robert Wilson, Lethenty, Tullynessle, on 23rd June. The stock consisted of 43 animals, 8 of which have become affected and been slaughtered. The last case occurred on 22nd July. Mr. Wilson purchased some English cattle from William Gordon, cattle dealer, Aberdeen, on 17th October last, and disea»e first showed itself in one of them. Pleuro- pneumonia was declared to exist at Upper Cairntield, Old- maclier, occupied by William Cruicksliank, on 27tli May. The whole of the animals (4 in number) have been slaughtered, and the place thoroughly cleaned and disinfected. The owner purchased a cow from John Duncan, Aberdeen, on 4lh April, which became first affected. Pleuro-pueuinonia was declared to exist amongst a lot of 6 one-year-old Irish stirks belonging to James Leys, South Meanecht, on 2nd June. Four animals have become affected, and been slaughtered. The owner purchased the cattle from John Duncan, Aberdeen, about 20th April, and they no doubt give rise to this out- break. The last attack occurred on 16th July. James Hay, Little Ythsie, Tarves, purchased a cow from Wm. Wood, cattle dealer, Newmachar, on 28ih May, which was killed and foQud to be affected, on the 3rd June. She had not mixed with the rest ot the cattle, and no more cases occurred. Pleuro-pneumonia was declared to exist amongst the stock of Alexander Murray, Nethermill, Cruden, on ith June. There were 61 animals on the farm, six of which have been slaugh- tered. The last attack occurred on 29th June. Mr. Murray p irchased seven Orkney cattle from John Duncan, Aberdeen, on 22nd April, and they have been the only animals affected. Pleuro-pneumonia was declared to exist at Berryliill amongst a lot of twelve Irish cattle belonging to John Hunter, brewer, Peterhead, on 9th June. Mr. Hunter purchased the lot in an Ellon market on 2nd March. They were kept for some time at his farm of Damhead until put out to grass at Berryhill. Five of the animals have become affected and been slaughtered. The last attack occurred on the 11th July. The disease manifested itself at the same time in a cow belonging to William Alexander, SpriughiU, Peterhead, which had been brought from the farm of Damhead on the 28th of May, and had been in contact with the Irish cattle above alluded to. No more cases have occurred at Springhill. Pleuro-pneumonia was declared to exist amongst the stock of Thomas Findlay, auctioneer and cattle dealer, Peterhead, on the Iltli June. The owner had placed eight cattle on turnips at the farm of Annieswells, Old Deer, and had removed them on the 25th May to a grass field at Little Kirkhill, where they became affected. Two animals became affected, and have been slaughtered. The last attack occurred on 18th June. In consequence of disease appealing amongst Mr. Findlay's cattle, after having been removed so recently from Annies- wells, 1 examined the stock on this farm, belonging to John Mitchell. I made a post-mortem examination of a calf which had died on the 26th of May, and found undoubted evidence of the disease. The owner states that he lost two calves in the end of April, both of which he is now convinced were atfected with pleuro-pneumonia. Five animals have become affected, and been slaughtered. The last attack occurred on 7th July. Mr. Mitchell has lost a number of calves at in- tervals, and these were principally purchased from Mr. Anderson, Clochcan, Old Deer, who imports large numbers from the south. There is little doubt but that disease has been bronglit to this farm by one or other of those imported calves. Pleuro-pneumonia was declared to exist among the stock of Charles Watt, Meikle, Balthangie, Monquhitter, on 23rd June. 'I'liere were 28 animals. Five became affected, and have beeii slaughtered. The last attack occurred on 23rd July. The owner purchased an ox in Cuminestown fair about the 30tli April from James Carmichael, cattle dealer, Keith. It died about the 6tli of June. I examined the lungs, and found that the ox had been affected with the disease. One of two cows belonging to William M'William, crofter, Gether- dams, Tullynessle, became affected on 24th June, and was slaughtered. The other cow and a calf, being the whole stock on the croft, remain healthy. The owner, who is grieve to Robert Wilson, Lethenty, had taken the cow from tliat farm about six weeks previous to the outbreak. The disease was declared to exist at Wester Kinglesser, Fraserburgh, occupied by John Oliphant, on 6th July. The stock consisted of 20 cattle, 4 of which have been slaughtered while suffering from the disease. The last attack occurred on 1st August. The owner purchased two cows at a sale of cattle belonging to John Smith, Fraserburgh, about 20th February ; one of these cows was the first to become affected. I examined a cow belonging to George Elmslie, crofter, Hill of Cotburn, Turriff, on the 7th J uly, found her affected, and ordered her slaughter. James- THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 2S9 Carrnichael, cattle dealer, Keith, sold an ox in a Turriff market, about 13tli May, to Alex. Thom, crofter, Litterty, Monquhitter, who resold the animal on tlie 27tli M;ty to George Elmslie. The auiinal died, but the true nature of tiie disease was not ascertained till the cow became alFecletl. A cow, the only animal on the plate, belonging to J.imes Henry, crofter, Davisliill, Foveran, was found affected on lith July, and was slaughtered. The cow was purcluised from William Wood, cattle dealer, Newm^char, on tbe 1st May. Pleuro-pneuraouia was declared to exist among tbe stock of Andrew Cowieson, Millseat, King Edward, on tiie 17th July. He purchased an ox iu a Turriff market about 13lh May, from James Uarniicliael, cattle dealer, Keith, aud there is little doubt the ox brougbt tlie disease to this (arm. 'Ibere were 27 animals on tlie farm, one of vvhicii has become affected and been slaughtered. Pleuro pneumonia broke out among the stock of Janins M'Kessor, Percy horuer, Fraser- burgh, on 18th July. Tlie stock consisted of 25 animals, 4 of which have become affected and been slaughtered. Tbe owner purchased a cow from John Mowatt, Moss of Carduo, Fraserburgh, on the 20tli of April. Mowatt was a purchaser of cattle at the same sale of stock in Fraserburgh, at wbicb Jobu Oliphant, above mentioned, bought, and it is therefore not unlikely that the di-ease has been brought to this place by the cow. Pleuro-pneiimonia was declared to exist at lirae- side of Kinraundy, Skene, occupied by John Henderson, on 6th August. The stock numbers 3t, one of which has become affected and been slaughtered. The owner had a calf which died on loth July, and affected in the lungs. I have not yet ascertained the cause of this outbreak. I visited Abbotshaugh, parish of Monquhitter, occupied by Walter Allan, on the 19lh instant, and found 2 cows affected. One calf, 7 moutiis old, died about the end of May, and the owner is now convinced it also was affected with pleuro. I have not ascertained par- ticulars as to the cause of this outbreak. Yesterday I ex- amined 12 cattle belonging to James Carrnichael, cattle dealer, Keith, which are iu one of tiie Castle Parks at Huntley, aud found one of them affected witii pleuro. The owner had removed the animals about the middle of May from the farm of Colleouard, Banffshire, where disease was after- wards found to exist. 1 have before reported that I consider 30 days after the last case too limited a period during which an infected place should be under tiie restrictions of the Act. And you have more than once memorialised the Privy Council on the subject. I am still convinced that a con- siderable extension of the period is absolutely necessary before we can effectually deal with the disease ; aud I hope you will again urge upon the Privy Council tbe expediency of in- creasing it to 60 days at least. In many cases I find that cattle have been removed from an infected place shortly before the declaration of disease. I am of opinion that Local Authorities should be authorised, if the removal has taken place within 30 days prior to the discovery of disease, to put the places to which cattle have been removed also under restrictions, I am, my lords and gentleman, your obedient servant, James Thomson. The following communication from the Clerk to tiie Banff- shire Local Authority was read : In consequence of the prevalence of pleuro - pneumonia in this county, the Local Authority under the Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act, 1869, met and passed an order prohibiting the holding of cattle markets within the county for the next month. And I was instructed to forward a copy thereof to you, in the hope that your Local Authority would issue an order to prohibit the holding cattle markets at TurrilF, as disease exists in that district. I send herewith a print of the order. I also, by desire of the meeting, send you a copy of the memorial to the Privy Council, which explains itself; and will be glad to know if the Local Authority of your county will make any representation. Mr. Thomson, the Inspector, at the request of the Chair- man, gave his opinion on the question of whether it was of much practical use to stop the cattle markets. As long as the sales of dealers were allowed to go on he did not see that tlie suspension of the ordinary markets would produce much good in the way of stopping the spread of the disease. It was well known that it was at these sales and auctions that the disease was spread, where parties could easily get their beasts put up for sale without their own names becoming known as the sellers. Mr. Barclay, M.P. : I am sure we all sympathise very much with the Local Authority of Baaffahire in their anxiety to take measures to limit and exterminate pleuro-pneumonia, which, I believe, in certain respects, is a more troublesome and dangerous disease to deal with than cattle plague. We are all very gl:id to see the vigilance wbicb is beiug exercised by the people in Banffshire, for, alihough they have always been ready to deal vigorously in checking the disease, as much cannot be said for other Local Authorities elsewhere. We are also all very anxious, 1 am sure, as well on our own behalf as that of the people of Banffshire, to take any measure which pro- mises to be effective in preventing the spread of disease ; but I think it incumbeat upon us, before taking steps which v»'ill certainly give inconvenience lo many, to satisfy ours;dves that the restrictions contemplated will really liave a tendency, or are calculated to produce results preventing tbe spread of tiie disease. Iu our experience in Aberdeenshire, we have found, and I think the Inspector will bear me out in saying so, that the disease has been introduced into aud spread in the county, not so much by local markets as by English or Irish cattle in- troduced directly to the county, or by tlie public sales of dealers which periodically take place iu various districts. No doubt cattle imported into the county are exposed in the local markets, but to prevent the holding of these markets would be to encourage these local dealers' sales, which have been the great meaus of spreading the disease in this county. Were this a proposal to prohibit the import of cattle from the south — say Irish and English cattle — I am quite of opinioa that such a measure would have great effect, coupled with a vigorous treatment of the existing cases within the county, in extermi- nating the disease, but 1 do not say that, looking to the very serious inconveniences that would arise, I am prepared to advocate or support such a proposal. Before the House of Commons' Committee last year, it was conclusively proved that pleuro-pneumonia could not be corarauuicated by any external matter ; that attempts to communicate the disease from one animal to another by inoculating with diseased lung — by introducing parts of the diseased lung into tbe nostrils — or by any other extreme m a- sures that could be [devised, had entirely failed. The only exception was the evidence of Mr. Gamgee, who stated that in one case he had succeeded in communicating the disease. But the Committee from the evidence laid before them by all the leading authorities arrived at the conclusion, without any doubt, that pleuro-pneumonia could only be communicated by the live animal to the live animal, and with the death of an animal affected with pleuro-pneumonia all risk ot infection ceased. If, therefore, the Local Authority in Banffshire took care — and I have no doubt they will take care — to prevent animals beiug removed from farms where disease exists, that is, with the present powers which Local Authorities possessed, the only really effective measure which could be adopted. But I do not believe that the stoppage of the markets would pro- duce any material result in the direction they hope, and would cause very serious inconvenience, not only lo the cattle trade, but to other agricultural business. I think ii would be unfor- tunate to cause inconvenience unless there was reason to be- lieve that advantages would arise from the restrictions, because when the county was subjected to restrictions which were ot no use, it made people impatient and unwilling to submit to such restrictions as the Local Authority might af erwards come to see would really be of benefit, aud likely to prevent the further spread of the disease. I therefore propose that we should express our regret that we cannot comply with the request of the Local Authority for Banffshire, and that we do not see it expedient at preseut to prohibit Turritf markets. Mr. H. L. L. Morrison, of Blair, seconded. The Chairman concurred entirely with what Mr. Barclay had said in regard to the matter. The Banffshire Local Au- thority had ever since the Act bad been passed, been anxious to carry it out, and they had never had to complain of that Local Authority, as they had of others. He therefore came to the consitleration of this memorial with the feeling that un- less some good reason could be shown to the contrary they should accede to the suggestions it contained, and adopt the course they had taken in Banffshire. Although he had not the practical knowledge of some on this question, yet his own observation — and he had made it his business to observe the matter closely — concurred with the views of the inspector and Mr. Barclay, and he believed they need not at present take 290 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. the very strong step of putting a stop to tlie ordinary local cattle markets. The motion proposed by Mr. Barclay was agreed to. The Chairman drew attention to the reference in the me- morial from Banffshire, and in their own report, of the exten- sion of time from thirty days to sixty or ninety days. He had no hesitation in saying tliat they entirely concurred with the views of tlie Banffshire Local Authority on tliat subject. The Aberdeenshire Local Authority had for years repeatedly memo- rialised the Privy Council on the subject, and tliey could have no hesitation now in expressing concurrence with tlie Banff- shire Local Authority ; at the same time, liowever, bearing in mind tliat it was the House of Commons and the Government thay had to memorialise, and not the Privy Council, as tlie point involved an alteration in the Act of Parliament, and not a mere Order in Council. Mr. Barclay : It occurs to me that the most direct way for the people of Banffshire to give effect to their views on the amendment of cattle lejjislation would be to submit their sug- gestion to the Duke of Richmond, who is a large landed pro- prietor in the county, and who is at the head of the veterinary department of the Government. Formerly the Vice-President of the Council, Mr. Forstei, had charge of tliis department, but when the subject was before the House of Commons, Lord Sandon, the present Vice-President of the Council, informed me that he did not know anything regarding the veterinary department, wliich the Duke of Richmond had taken under his control. If the local authority for Banffshire then can satisfy the Duke of Eichmond as to the expediency of the change they suggest, that will be the direct way to the amendment of the law, for the Government would doubtless give effect to and support any measure which the Duke would recommend in a department under his own charge ; and as regards the proposal to extend the period from thirty to sixty days during which cattle should not be removed from a place where pleuro-pneumonia existed, the committee of the House of Commons was unanimous in recommending that ciiange. On the suggestion of the chairman, a committee was ap- poiiiled, consisting of the following gentlemen: Colonel Innes ofLearney; Mr. Barclay, M. P.; Mr. Cochrane, Little Haddo ; Mr. M'Combie, M.L". ; and Mr. Scott, Glendronach ; and Sheriff Tliomson, to confer with the committees that might be appointed by the counties of Banff and Moray, for the purpose of making representations to the Duke of Richmond by depu- tation and otherwise. A communication from the Elginshire local authority, in re- ference to a letter fro;n the Queen's Remembrancer, requesting that payment be made of a moiety of the penalties that liad been recovered in prosecutions under the Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act, 1869, was read. The chairman pointed out that, according to this Act, one-half of the penalties recovered fell to the Crown, but hitherto this had not been paid. The Elginshire authority wished them to join in a representation that this claim might be departed from, as the counties had been at considerable expense with regard to the matter, and to tliis suggestion lie supposed there would be no ohjeciion. From their own accounts, it appeared that £155 had been paid for the prosecutions, and only £61 penalties recovered. It was agreed to concur with the Elginshire authority in any action they might take on the matter. SCOTCH GAME CASE. Tn the Justice of Peace Court at Forfar — Bailie Grant on the bench — the case of Major Lyon, of Ballintore, Forfarshire, against James M'Nicoll, jun., farmer. Wester Ballintore, was disposed of. The question involved was, whether the son of a tenant-farmer can go upon the uncul- tivated portion of the land of which his lather has the right of pasturage and shoot rabbits. Wra. Lindsay, gamekeeper, Ballintore, said, on evidence, that three or four years ago respondent commenced to shoot rabbits, and three years ago went on to the muir. Latterly he went to the hill pasture. Witness found respondent's son there, with his gun and dog, and often remonstrated with him for disturbing the game. On 17th July last saw him on the hill in question, which did not form part of the arable land. There were rabbits there. He tired several shots. There were also hares and grouse there. He killed two rabbits. He did not see the dog on the first occasion. When witness remonstrated with him he said he was ordered to shoot rabbits by his father. His dog disturbed the game. There was a fence across the hill for the benefit of the tenant. William Dunn, game watcher, Ballintore, corroborated. James M'Nicol, farmer, Ballintore, said his son was em- ployed on the farm and managed it for him. He looked after the sheep on the hill. The rabbits had increased greatly since Mr. Austin became tenant of the shootings. Witness found it necessary to keep them down for the protection of his crops, and furnished his son with a gun licence lor that pur- pose. His crops had been injured by the rabbits. They sel- dom saw any grouse on the ridge between the pasture and the arable land. David Clarke, farmer, Clintlaw, Airlie, said the rabbits appeared to have damaged the crops to a greater extent than he had ever seen. Peter Smith, Easter Coul, said the rabbits had increased to a great est«nt since Mr. Austin became tenant of the shoot- ings. Mr. Anderson, for the petitioner, maintaioed that, though it had been held by a narrow majority of the Court that a tenant cannot be said to trespass on his own farm yet that the son or brother of a tenant can be said to trespass in exactly the same way as it had been held that a farm-servant may be guilty of trespassing on the farm on which he is a servant, because he trespassed in pursuit of game. The tenant's copy of the lease was put in process, but Mr. Anderson, for the petitioner, held that that was not sufiicient. However, even if it were sufiicient, he maintained that he was entitled to a conviction in respect the tenant's right to the ground on which the trespass was alleged to have taken place was restricted to pasturage, the reason being, he understood, that the rent pay- able for the pasturage was so small compared with that given for the right of shooting. He had proved that the trespass took place not on the arable land, but on the pasturage. Mr. Thornton, for respondent, maintained that, it had no'' been proved that the respondent shot at hares or grouse or other game. The point, therefore, was whether the tenant had a right to shoot rabbits. Now, rabbits were not reserved in the lease, and he quoted cases to show that an agricultural tenant was entitled to shoot rabbits if they were not reserved iu the lease, and in this case the reservation in the lease was game only. This was the usual way in which farms were let, and the respondent was as much tenant of the hill as of the other portion ot the farm. Were this low-lying country in- stead of hill, it would have been let as an agricultural subject. The hill could not be ploughed. 1 hen a neighbouring farmer had told the Court that at the sheep-clipping, before there was any word of this action, the respondent had said that his rea- son for not trapping instead of shooting the rabbits was that he did not want to trap hares. This prosecution had been brought because, the year being so bad for grouse, the tenant of the shootings, Mr. Austin, wanted to get as much as pos- sible out of the land. The Justice, in giving judgment, said : It is not proved here that the respondent was in search of anything else than rab- bits. There is no evidence to that effect. In point of fact, the gamekeeper spoke to the fact distinctly that he was only killing rabbits, and nothing else, and as they are vermin I hold it proved that he had authority from his lather to kill them, and that his father had the right to grant him that authority, and he had an equal right to act upon it. I shall find that rabbits are vermin, that his father was tenant, and that he granted the right to his son, and dismiss the complaint. This finding does not in the slightest degree touch the civil case. Mr. Thornton : I move for expenses in this case. The Justice : Of course. Mr. Anderson : I shall intimate an appeal in the usual way The expenses amounted to £3 7s. 6d. THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 291 MANCHESTER. To Manchester belongs the honour of having formed a distinctive school of public men in the Free Trade struggle; but Reform preceded, and vias, indeed, the necessary forerunner of Free Trade. Like Birmingham, Leeds, and other large centres of industry, Manchester had been unrepresented in the House of Commons. The member given by Cromwell was of course taken away after the Restoration. The French War resulted in dear food, heavy taxes, and distress. The colliers dragged two cart-loads of coal from Bilston to Carlton House, the residence of the Prince Regent, in the hope that if they could bring their sufferings and want visibly before the actual head of tlie State lie might put an end to tliem. A similar fancy took possession of the poor workmen of Manchester. In 1819, a year of fearful distress, they proposed to March to London and lay their complaints before the Regent. They proposed, of course, to walk all the way, to sleep under hedges or in barns at night, and the poor simple souls had provided themselves with blankets for that purpose. They were rather roughly treated by the not over-scrupulous authorities of the time. These eloquent though almost speechless proclaimers of the people's miseries were dispersed, imprisoned, and never allowed to reach the august presence of him whom they fondly hoped to move by their tale of woe. The remedy in which the people believed was Parliamentary Reform. Early in this memorable year of 1819 a great meeting was held at Manchester, and again the people resolved not to apply to Parliament but directly to the Prince Regent. Their profound disbelief in the want of sympathy between the Legislature and the people led to this infatuation. The year was destined not to pass with- out making wider the gulf between the rulers and the ruled, and the hatred of class against class, whicli had recently been of a grievously quick growth, was intensified by the shedding of innocent blood. This was the Peterloo massacre. Tlie Government had published proclamations against " seditious meetings." The two " legislatorial attorneys and representa- tives for Birmingham" had been elected, and a proclamation against mock elections had also been issued. Nevertheless it was determined to hold a meeting in Manchester to petition the House of Commons for a reform of Parliament and the repeal of the Corn-laws. August 16 was the day fixed for the meeting, and a field near St. Peter's Church, called St. Peter's Field, the place. The | people were assembled — 60,000 in number — and the chairman, " Orator Hunt," was addressing them, when they were attacked by a body of yeomanry, who killed eight persons and wounded about 600 in the attempt to disperse the meeting and arrest its chairman. This attack of the yeomanry on the people has inspired several local ballads. I quote a verse from one of these broadsides as a specimen of the popular political muse of tlie time : Mr. Himtneawcoom forrard an' spoke a few words, When the Peterloo cut-my-throats shaken'd th' swords ; Aw thort sure enoof they were running ther rigs, Till aw seed mom nor twenty lay bleeding like pigs. From this time the people of Manchester became bitterly earnest supporters of Parliamentary Reform, and when the time came rendered effective help in carrying the bill. It was here that in 1833, on the last defeat of the bill by the Lords, the advice was first given to " go for gold and stop the Duke." That tliis advice was given in earnest and with the intention of carrying it out to the fullest is proved by tiie fact that there was a run on the Manchester savings-banks, and no fewer than 620 depositors gave notice of withdrawals to the amount of upwards of £16,000. In a few graphic sentences Lord Macaulay has described the Manchester of 1685, when its popnlatiou was under six thousand people. The Rev. W. N. Moleswortii says that iu 1830 " it was a political cypher, unrepresented ia Parliament, and having the municipal institutions of a village." By 1846 it had grown to be "the metropolis of a great part of the northern and midland coun- ties, and was more especially the centre of a district which was regarded as one that was emerging from barbarism, the in- habitants of which still used an uncouth dialect which pro- voked the derision of their southern countrymen, and which was chiefly known by its smoking chimneys, its perpetual rains, the length and severity of its winter, its almost sunless summer, as well as by a hiwless turbulence which embarrassed the Governmeut, perplexed the Legislature, and dismayed the inhabitants of the more favoured parts of the kingdom." But the day of Manchester's poli'ical greatness was approaching. The inventions of Arkwright and the application of steam had developed her old cotton trade into one of the most thriving industries of the kingdom. The passing of the Reform Bill gave two members to the constituency, and hastened ou the agitation for the repeal of the Corn-Laws— an agitation which was organised and conducted mainly by Manchester men, and carried to a successful issue by Manchester influence. Free Trade had its birth and growth in this grtat town, and its victories are due to the skill, the indomitable energy, and the irresistible logic of the Manchester School. The first mem- bers returued for Manchester were Poulett Thompson, " after- wards Lord Sydenham, who at that time was the most con- spicuous Free Trader in the kingdom, and Mr. Mark Phillips, well known as an ardent radical and a zealous Free Trader." Public opinion in the great towns was being educated by the teachings of these early advocates, by the stirring poems of Ebenezer Elliot, and by those still more effectual tutors — bad trade, low wages, high taxes, and empty stomaehs. Manchester was by situation and by condition of the people admirably fitted to conduct such an agitation. She was tlie active and industrious centre of the rapidly increasing cotton trade, a trade largely depending on foreign markets, and the great mill owners and manufacturers found their energies crippled, their skill baffled, their resources jeopardised, and the industry and skill of their workpeople rendered of little avail by the influence of the Corn-Laws and the prevalence of projection. It was a question of life and death to the manu- facturing interests, who entered on their Free Trade crusade with all the resolute calmness and unflinching courage of men wiio had calculated the strength of the enemy's entrenchments and were resolved to carry the position. The struggle cost ten years of sharp and unceasing agitation. Tlie first Anti-Corn Law Association was organised in London in the year 1836, but it did little work, had comparatively no influence, and speedily died of inanition. It was in 1838 that the agitation became powerful, and it was then that an association was formed which whs not dissolved until the work was done. The Anti-Corn Law League was founded in Manchester. When the time was ripe the man was ready. Richard Cobden came to the front, and with him were associated a bold array of able and earnest lieutenants : Poulett Thompson, Mark Phillips, Dr. Bowring, J.B.Smith, Milner Gibson, George Wilson, C. P. Villiers, and John Briglit. Cobden and Bright were the Achates of the agitation. They were iu some re- spects the antitheses of each other. Cobden was calm, logical, unimpulsive ; strong in reasoning, powerful in figures, a perfect master of the subject, he exercised an enormous influence over hearers and readers. Bright was fervid, eloquent, " terribly in earaest," and denunciatory. The difiiculties were increased by the course taken by a large portion of the working classes. The time of the Corn Law League was also the period of the Chartist agitation, and Feargus O'Connor and his forces were arrayed against those led by Ricliard Cobden. Free Trade meetings were disturbed by Chartists. Ameudraents were proposed, although rarely, if ever, carried ; and the battle of Protection was fought by Protection's own victims. Tlie Chartists contended that the shortest way to repeal the Corn- Laws was to pass the Charter. Yet the corn laws were re- pealed twenty-five years ago by the unreformed Parliraent, the Charter is not yet the law of the land, and the second Household Suffrage Parliament is governed by the old Protec- tionist party. For six years the Anti-Corn Law League worked unceasingly. The Leaguers built a Free Trade Hall in Mancliester, and when that was burnt down they erected another : " the largest room available" for such purposes " in the kingdom." Bazaars were held in support of the League, and at one of these the money realised amounted to £25,000. The money raised for this agitation was enormous. In a speech at Coveut Garden Theatre on February I9th, 1845, Mr. Bright said : " In tlie year 1839 we first asked for sub- scriptions, and £5,000 was given. In 1840 we asked for 292 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. more, and between £7,000 and £8,000 was subscribed. In 18il we held the great conference at Manchester, at which upwards of 700 ministers attended. In 1812 we had our great bazaar in Manchester, from which £10,000 was reahsed. In 18i3 we asked for £50,000, and got it. In 184i we called for £100,000, and between £80,000 and £90,000 has been paid in, besides what will be received from the bazaar to be held in May. This year is yet younp:, but we have not been idle. We have asked our Free Trade friends in the northern counties to convert some of their property, so as to be able to defend tlieir rights, and properties at the hust- ings. This has been done, and it now appears that, at the recommendation of the Council of the League, our friends in Lancashire, Cheshire, and Yorkshire have invested a sum of not less than £250,000 in the purchase of county qualifica- tions." But this was not enough. Another appeal was made to the Manchester free-traders. A meeting was held at the League offices on December 13, 18i5, of seventy of the largest subscribers to the funds, and it was resolved to make appeal for £250,000. Another meeting for this purpose was held on the 23rd, at which in an hour and a-half upwards of sixty thousand pounds was subscribed. Such is provincial public spirit in England. London was little more tlian a spectator of this stupendous agitation. Manchester was the political capital for the time. Free-traders throughout the land fixed their eyes on Manchester and from Manchester took their cue. To the great cotton capital belong the chief honours of the campaign and the victory. Manchester converted Sir Robert Peel and the Duke of WeUington from the old dogma of Pro- tection to the new creed of free-trade. The town, which was unrepresented in the House of Commons in 1830, in 1846 dictated to the British Parliament a policy which is revolu- tionising the commerce of the world. The bill was adopted by the House of Lords on the 25th of June, and on the 2nd of July the League was dissolved. Its last acts were to vote £10,000 to its chairman, Mr. Geo. Wilson, and to take steps to raise a fund sufficient to enable Mr. Cobdeu to devote himself to the public service. The public influence of Manchester culminated for the time in the success of this famous agita- tion. To-day the " Manchester School" is a phrase of his- tory and not of current politics. But its work did not quite cease in 1846. The Manchester School was inspired by two leading principles ; Free-trade and non-intervention in foreign affairs. Non-intervention is not now the badge of a political section or the motto of an agitation ; but tl e theory has had an immense influence on British statesmanship, and Man- chester may fairly lay claim to much of the houour of such incidents as the Geneva Arbitration and the Frencli Treaty. But if non-intervention has set its mark pretty deeply on Bntish Imperial policy, as a banner of agitation it almost extinguished the " Manchester School." Cobden defeated Lord Palmerston in 1857 on the Chinese question, but it was upon our policy in the Crimea rather than upon our acts iu China that iu the general election which followed the Man- chester School was defeated along the whole line. Cobden lost his seat, and Manchester rejected both John Bright and Milner Gibson by large majorities. But the decadence of the direct influence of the Manchester School is not a measure of the fall of the city's political influence. The school dies, but Manchester lives, and presently, when the time comes for understanding the political developments through which we are now passing, it will perhaps be seen that the great town which was once the capital of the free-trade movement became the real centre of that " Conservative Reaction" which has had almost as potent an influence upon a ];eriod of Parlia- mentary history as had the Anti-Corn Law League of thirty years ago. It must not be forgoUen tliat the Manchester School, or rather the great body of politicians identified with it, were early leaders in the agitation for national education. In 1849 the Lancashire Public School Association was formed for the purpose of obtaining a system of national education very like that now advocated by the League. In October, 1850, a conference on the subject was held at Manchester, at which it was resolved " Tliat the Lancashire Public School Association be resolved into a society to be called the National Public School Association, for the establishment by law in England and Wales of a general system of secular instruction, to be maintained by local rates and under the management of local authorities specially elected by the ratepayers." Mr, Cobden was one of the most earnest supporters of this asso- ciation, and at a public meeting of the National Association held also in Manchester on January 23, 1851, he moved a resolution and made one of his best speeches in support of the system proposed. The labours of this society prepared the way for future action on the education question ; and al- tliou;^^ country in a most imperfect state ot Difference lu the soil, climate, &c., made it almost imno«iM» I -Itivation, which could by means of capital and energy be to legislate for the whole kingdom, but they would see what 'Ji'0"gh'^ ^° profitable and advantageous condition. "' ■ ■ ' Mr. Prosser, the secretary, being blessed with a good landlord, was not so much in favour of the bill. He knew, however, of farms in tiiis county where four white crops had been taken from the land in succession, and the effect of the bill in such cases w^ould be that landlords would claim com- pensation from tenants. The Chairman, in closing the discussion, said if a good moderate bill was passed even then he did not believe it would suit all circumstances. He still thought that there should be freedom of contract between landlord and tenant, but that the tenant should have ample compensation for un- exhausted improvements. Mr. Disraeli could do in the matter bill L^°^''°''^'' (Llandilo) and Mr. James approved of ''^ bill both arguing strongly in favour of security bein^ Imted totenants— a course which would benefit farmers aud im- prove the .and immensely. Mr. Warren was then callad upcn, and/in the course of his remarks said the questJon involved ii the bill was a national one. There wa. no doubt but that insecurity of tenure paralysed the en-^rgies of any man, whether he was a farmer or not. He should like to see an A.ct passed pro- viding security, and he almost believed that a bad Act would be better than no Act at all, because the effect of such an Act would be to draw the attention of the country to the matter, HORSE-BREEDING IN FRANCE. The following correspondence respecting horse-breeding establishments in France has "been published as a Parlia- mentary paper : Lord Lyons to the Earl of Derby. Paris, June 2, 1874. My Lord, — I have the honour to inclose herewith to your Lordship, extracted from the " Journal Officiel" of this "day, the promulgation of the Law on "Haras" (horse-breeding establishments) and remounts in France. I have, &c., (Signed) Lyons. Law on Sreedi/i// and Remount Esiahlishmgnis. The National Assembly has passed the Law of which the tenor is as follows : Article 1. The chief mauaging body of the breeding esta- blishment shall consist of a director-general, who shall be also the inspector-general ; six inspectors-general ; twenty- two managers of depots ; twenty-two assistant managers, and an efficient number of superintendents. Art. 2. A committee for the management of breeding esta- blishments shall be named by the President of the Republic for nine years. It shall consist of twenty-four members, and shall be renewed every three years, by a third of its members retiring, and shall represent the different classes. Members retiring are re-eligible. It shall hold at least two sittings a- year. It shall report on the estimates of the breeding esta- blishments, on the general regulations for exhibitions and race meetings, on the kind and amount of encouragement to be given for breeding and rearing, and on all questions which may be submitted to it by the Minister or, in his absence, by the Director-General of the Haras. The decisions of the Departmental Councils (Conseils-Gene'raux) as also their de- bates concerning the horse question shall be communicated to them. After each sitting a full and detailed report on its labours shall be drawn up, and this report shall be communi- cated to the National Assembly. Art. 3. The school of the " Haras du Pin" shall be re- established. No one shall become an officer of the Haras unless he has received a diploma certifying that he has passed the final examinations of this school. Art. 4. From the year 1875, the actual number of stallions kept by the managing body of the Haras shall be increased by 200 stallions each year, until the maximum of 2,500 shall be reached. These stallions shall be chosen from the different breeds, and there shall be as many thoroughbred stallions among them as possible. Art. 5. Independently of the sums voted each year for race meetings, training schools, &c., the present grant of 683,000 fr. destined for prizes, shall in 1875 be increased to 800,00 fr., and after that by an annual increase of 100,000 fr. up to the sum of 1,500,000 fr., in order to provide prizes for— 1. Stallions belonging to private individuals, clubs, or depart- ments, that have been approved of by the managing body of the Haras ; 2. Brood mares, fillies, and colts. A grant of 50,000 fr. shall be devoted to trials of Arabs and Anglo- Arabs. Art. 6. The establishment for brood mares at Pompadour shall be re-established. It shall consist of sixty mares devoted exclusively to the breeding of Arab and Anglo-Arab horses. Done in the public sitting at Versailles, of the 29th May, 1874. (Signed) L. Bufeet, President. (Signed) Felix Voisin, Francisque Hive, Viscount Blin de Bourdon, Louis de Segur, Secretaries. The President of the Kepublic hereby promulgates this law. (Signed) Marshal De Mac Mahon, Due de Magenta. (Countersigned) L. Gritart, Minister of Agriculture and Commeree. Lord Lyons to the Earl of Derby. Paris, June 5, 1874. My Lord, — I have the honour to transmit herewith to your Lordship a despatch of this day's date from Colonel Conolly on horse-breeding establishments in France. I have, &c., (Signed) Ltons. Colonel Conolly to Lord Lyons. Paris, June 5, 1874. My Lord, — Seeing by the newspapers that the subject of " horses" is likely to come again soon before the British Parliament, I have the honour ,to inclose copy of a Law which has just been passed by the French National Assembly for the encouragement of horse-breeding in general, and upon establishments for remounting the army. I shall be in a position to give further information on this subject by the next messenger, and to forward additional documents. I have, &c., (Signed) James Conolly. Lord Lyons to the Earl of Derby. Paris, June 9, 1874. My Lord, — I have the honour to transmit herewith to your Lordship a despatch from Colonel Conolly dated the 8th instant, on the subject of breeding horses for the French army. I have, &c., (Signed) Lyons. Colonel Conolly to Lord Lyons. My Lord, — With reference to my last two despatches on the subject of horses, I have the honour to forward the fol- lowing additional documents : Law passed by the National Assembly upon breeding and remount establishments ; Two days' debate on the above Law in the Chamber at Versailles ; Observations on encouragement and improvement of the breed of horses in France. I now beg to offer the following remarks upon the whole question, which excites considerable attention in the French Government and throughout the country. The school of the Haras du Pin, in Normandy, re-established by Article 3 of the Law, is destined to give an education in the veterinary art, and in the judgment and ma- nagement of horses, which will qualify young men who have diplomas from thence for the higher positions in Government " Haras." The utility of this school is contested by many who advocate, for such diplomas, a competitive examination open to all France. The establishment for brood-mares at Pompadour, in the Limousin, has many opponents, on the THE ^^ER's MAGAZINE. 303 ground of its interfering with private enterprise worii by M. de Croix, principal veterinary surgeon to' ♦Aate in Trance : Head. debate of th a Nation.1 Assembly v^reuuanlr^s^ arnjy. gives the following census of horses', mulesV and'aslv \ '°^''^!ood kdS'mustSi'avrSS iu^the French diligences ^ every gu j ^^ ^ ^ „ „„ii;^loa It is seen by Article * Grand total in Trance 3,633,605 ,, „ Algeria included... 4,000,000 They are divided thus : Colts and fillies under three years 400,45-t Entire horses 351,654 Geldings 872',911 Mares 1,257,852 Mules 299,129 Asses 450,625 Among them are — Covering stallions 12,000 Broodmares '.,.. 600',000 Which produce annually — Colts aud filly foals 300,000 The rise in the price of horses during the last tliree years lias given a great impulse to the breeding of them by the popula- tions of Algeria. The debate in the National Assembly at Versailles is worth reading i/i exienso by any one interested in horse-breeding or the mounting of an army. The pith of it, however, may be extracted from the speeches of M. Bocher, reporter Of the Committee, and of M. de Carajon-Latour, who is a large landed proprietor, master of hounds, and a good judge of all classes of liorses. M. de Carayon is for restricting, to tlie utmost the action of Government in tiiis direction, and insists that its stallions should not cover at a lower price than would remunerate a private proprietor. M. Bocher answers tliat this is all very well in England, but that, with the Trench system of subdivision of property, very lew private individuals can stand the expenses of a well-found breeding establishment. All parties agree that Government should interfere to prevent a circulation through the country of unsound covering stallions. The best remedy for such an evil consists in a heavy duty upon this class of animals, which can be mitigated or remitted where certificates are held from a superintendent of " Haras." It is also advocated that prizes should be given at agricultural meetings, horse exhibitions, &c., for the best brood mares and foals. The speakers in the ^?SSt^S:\^KlSrn,^iit covering sj^^s WK 'ventually be raised to 2,500 instead of (as at present) \.^i"Zx that, by tV introduction of judicious economies, the annu,V cos*-, of each animal will be reduced fro'n^,'^'^^"/^- 90c. to 1,460 fr. 78c. ^The 'whole financial system of the biU is developed in the weeches of l\ve Marquis de Dampricre, page 3567, aud of M. Bocher, page 3573 of the Debate The late horse exhibition (spring of thii year) was decidedly inte- rior to that of 1873. 1 can strongly itecoramend the inciosure of my despatch, ■ Observations by the Society for Encou- raging and Improving the Breed of Horses in France, to the perusal of all of my countrymen who take an interest m this important subject. It gives a carefully prepated history ot thoroughbred stock and of racing in this country, and it com- bats the argument that an excessive number of handicaps aua of t^<> jcnr cU nud oiiuft raccs have had a deteriorating effect (combined with inordinate betting) as well upon the breed of horses as on public morality. Many good sportsmen in England, with whom I agree, and who are of opinion that evils of this kind have ensued from the multiplication of small race meetings, will read with impartiality this defence of the French system, which is not yet nearly as far advanced in that direction as our own. The pamphlet in question is not published for the trade, and copies of it are diflicult to he procured. The military considerations wliich influenced tlie Committee are fully explained by its reporter, pages 3571 and 3572 of the Debate. When the peace establisiiment of the army required 70,000 saddle horses, France had to import annually from 6,000 to 7,000; that establishment is now raised to 90,000. To pass from a peace to a war footing under the new military law demands 176,000 horses, and a large proportion of them of superior quality to what was formerly considered serviceable. The movements of field artillery are now so much accelerated that many of the draught horses of that arm must come from the same class as those for the cavalry. I have, &c., (Signed) James Conollt. WILTSHIRE BACON. We recently had occasion to visit a small Wiltshire town which has been for many years, and still is, the principal seat of bacon manulacture. There is nothing in the cleanly, quiet appearance of the town itself to indicate either the nature or the magnitude of tlie trade there carried on. Though our hotel was within a stone's throw of the principal slanghter- house, we were greeted with no shrill dissonant cries of pigs in distress, and protesting in their own way against having their tliroats cut. There were no open sewers flowing with blood and garbage, nor blackened slums reeking witli the smoke of burnt straw and hair. All was clean and orderly, as it there was no such a thing as a pig within filty miles. The only thing which struck us as unusual was the passage of several waggons laden with huge blocksof Norwegian ice, the summer supply of fifteen hundred tons being then about to be laid in. An uniform temperature is thus secured for the curing vaults, under a system patented by the proprietors, who are thus secured against heavy losses by unfavourable weather, and also enabled to meet the constant demand lor their bacon, aud send it out in a comparatively fresh condition all the year round. It stands by reason that if sufHcient bacon were cured during the cold weather to last all the summer months, which was the old-fashioned plan, the present system of curing would not answer, as the bacon would not keep An immense stock must also be necessarily accamulated in the spring to meet the supply, and the consumption of the offal, instead of being equalised, as now throughout the year, would in some seasons be far in excess and in others far inadequate to the demand. Fifty thousand pigs per annum are slaughtered in this estab- lishment, giving an average of about a thousand a week. Through the kindness of the proprietor I was enabled to see and make a note of the arrangements, notwithstanding the notice which met my eye at the entrance that there is " no admittance except on business." I use the word proprieto advisedly, for this is no joiit-stock affair, but is conducted by the skill and capital of one man, or rather one family, alone. The business has been in existence for more than half a cen- tury, and had comparatively a very small beginning, but has grown to the present magnitude through the indefatigable efforts of managers to meet the taste and requirements of the times. At first 1 was conducted to the shed in which the live stock are temporarily housed to await operations. There they were, comfortably nestling in clean straw, and with but little of the usual odour of the stye, a number of fine, plump, medium-sized pigs, grunting, snuffing, or groaning contentedly, and liappily unconscious of the late wliich awaited them on the morrow. I had neither tiie opportunity nor desire to see them brought to the knife, hut tlie modus operandi was lucidly explained to me by one of the operators. A chain is attached, by means of a noose, to one of the hind legs, and the animal is suddenly drawn up, head downwards, by means of a windlass. An incision is skilfully made in the throat. There is a mulfled shriek, a copious discharge of blood from the orifice, a few convulsive kicks, and the sanguinary deed is completed. The carcase is then removed to the singeing furnace, for Wiltshire bacon must not have its hair entirely removed by scalding, after the Yankee method, or it would Icse one of its cliarac- teristic marks, and consequcutly much of its value in the market. The old-fashioned plan was to lay the carcase on the ground in the open air, cover it up with straw, which was then set fire to, and the process continued as long as necessary, perhaps ten minutes or a quarter of an hour to a pig. This consumption of time and straw would never do on an extensive scale. A furnace is therefore contrived with a fiery aperture, into which the carcase of the pig is lifted by an ingeniously contrived lever, is there denuded of hair, and removed in 804 THE FARMER'S MAr^^^* about half a minute, it is then waslied and scraped clean a i • ^^ *^'°^ themselves. The proprietor is, we hear, a "'»'• ♦'^° +""J~-- of tijg jjjiJ^j jg^^ ^^^ j sajipg of John Bright, and conducts his establishment as far gambrel is inseited under the tendons or me luud Jess and , n - the carcase is suspended by an iron hook to a horizontal' bar ^possible on teetotal principles. There was, however, an un which traverses the whole length of the slauehter l,n„c<.' mistakable odour in the room of the weed which soothes and serving as a sort Of tramway, having sidings and crossinr- along which the carcase is easily slid from one operX°o another, until it is finally cut asunder avd taken dona ^'^^ disembowelling process comes nex*, the viscera fapu's the butcher's perquisites if the animal be bought by '(weight, are entirely removed.'; the liver, hear*, &c., forming a cheap and savoury dish for a poor man'? table, find a leady sale to meat pedlars, who hawk them aKiut the country, the overplus being sent to London or the nnghbouring towns. The entrails are passed down a kind of /unnel to the vaults below, where they are denuded of fat, sud passed on to women, who wash and cleanse them for sausage skins and " chitlings." The old- fashioned hog's pudding, composed of the blood and fat of the animal, mned with prepared oats and savoury herbs, stuffed into the entrails, a revolting looking mass, but when boiled and afterwards tcasted, a didi inr j,, (-picure. is not in so mnnh favour now as formerly ; the blood is consequently sold and highly prized for manure. The pig may now be said to be kifled and dressed by a series of operations which are per- formed, when " in full swing," at the rate of about ninety per hour. It is next weighed, and then slit down the middle, the lazaras, or back-bone, flake flat, head, and leg are removed, the sides neatly trimmed to shape, and they are then ready for salting. There is but little fresh meat taken from the pigs in this establishment ; the spare rib is " spare" indeed, and seldom weighs more than one or two pounds. The griskin is a mere attenuated strip, composed mostly of short transverse pieces of bone. The whole side, consequently, from the abundance of lean meat in its constitution, partakes more or less of the character of delicately flavoured ham, whilst the difficulty of disposing of the enormous quantity of fresh meat which would accrue were the sides trimmed in the ordinary manner is done away with. In favourable weather the meat is cut into sausages and sent to London and other larpe towns, where they are readily disposed of in fresh and prime condition. At other times the meat is sold to the hawkers, or salted down to be consumed at leisure. I was next conducted to the curing department, which is vaulted over, and surmounted by the large quantity of fresh ice as before mentioned. Were it not for this contrivance, the system pursued here could not be properly carried out. Each side receives its just proportion of salt, and neither more nor less, the conditions being equalised throughout the year by an equalisation of temperature. As may be supposed, everything here is scrupulously clean. The flooring, which would otherwise be inevitably sloppy, is composed of a patent pavement, ■which forms a complete series of grooves and channels, and is so laid as to drain itself. Here were huge piles of hams, cheeks, and sides of bacon undergoing the curing process, which is performed with salt and finely-pulverised Bengal salt- petre alone, the use of sugar, which is only necessary to counteract excessive saltness, being here unnecessary. The different sized sides are all arranged in separate piles, as the heavy ones require a somewhat longer time than the light ones. From the curing vaults to tl'.e drying houses, where they are either white or smoke dried, to suit the tastes of the pur- chaser, and then to the consumer, averages about a month from the time the pig is taken alive into the establishment. About ten million pounds of first-class bacon are sent out yearly, most of it finding its way to London and other large towns, where good things wUl always command a good price. Our sister countries, Scotland and Ireland, notwithstanding their pride in native produce, are not insensible to the charms of Wiltshire bacon, and figure largely as customers. The proprietor is thus enabled to obtain the highest price of any other curer in the world, though he has no advantage such as a monopoly of the raw material or a secret in the mode of treatment would give him. The method is open to anyone who chooses to exercise it with the same care and discretion as are here observed. We must not forget the lard, which is run into bladders and shallow tin pans, and sold by the ton to large consumers. " This is our readin' room," said my guide, opening a door, and ushering me into a spacious and well- lighted apartment, well furnished with books, newspapers, and periodicals. Here the men who reside at a distance take their meals, and spend, if they are so minded, the intervals of labour. The literary character given to the apartment looks well, and shows that those who kill fat swine need not neces- not inebriates, which showed some amount of toleration of the weaknesses of our fellow men, inasmuch as smoking was not strictly prohibited.— /Fi7('* Gazette. SLAUGHTERHOUSES ACT, 1874.— By the Building Act of 1844 certain businesses were put under regulation as offensive or noxious, as they were then carried on in a manner injurious to health. Dwelling-houses were not to be built withiu 50ft. from any buildings in use for such a business. If the building was (]pstroj-ca or pulled down it might be rebuilt, but no new business could be established at a less distance than 40ft. from a public way, or 50ft. from a dwelling-house, and if then carried on within such distances it was prohibited to be so carried on after 30 years from the 9ih of August, 1844, unless means were used to mitigate the nuisance to the satisfaction of a jury at Quarter Sessions in Middlesex, which was declared to be the reiiiie for the whole metropolis. Last year those con- cerned in the trade of slaughtering cattle became alarmed at the existence of these prohibitory enactments, and the penalty of £50 a day for infringing them ; and an attempt was made to get a repealing Bill passed, but it was withdrawn, and a Select Committee substituted to take evidence regarding noxious businesses. Those concerned in most of the business were fully heard, and much useful information was recorded to show how much the practice was improved in each trade under the system of inspection prescribed by the Metropolis Local Management Acts and the Nuisance Laws, which are executed by the corporative Vestries and District Boards. The trades specified in 1844 were blood boiler, bone boiler, fellmonger, slaughterer of cattle, sheep, or horses, soap boiler, tallow melter, and tripe boiler. Those who promoted the agitation were the Butchers' Trade Society, as they were most numerous, and, although that trade had never been required to conform to the law, they yet feared the penal construction which might be put upon it at the end of the period of 30 years. It did not appear to be understood that the " business of a slaughterer of cattle, sheep, or horses" did not refer to the butcher who killed his own beasts, but applied to those who killed for other persons for hire, or kept knackers' yards, and the letter used to be the most offensive places. By the new Act the trades are divided into two classes. The blood boiler, bone boiler, manute manufacturer, soap boiler, tallow melter, and knacker are prohibited from anew estabUshing such businesses within the metropolis, subject to apenaly of £50 for establishing, and also a hke penalty per day for carrying on the same. The word " anew" has a wide meaning as given in the statute. The other businesses of a fellmonger, tripe boiler, or slaughterer of cattle, and any other businesses declared to be offensive, are not to be established anew without the sanction of the local authority. That authority is to inspect and make orders and by-laws for the regulation of these trades after hearing all objections. The local authority for the metropolis (except the City of London) is the Metropolitan Board of Works, and the Commissioners of Sewers within the City. The Vestries and District Boards are to inspect as to nuisances, and the Privy Council inspectors can inspect as to disease in animals. The magistrates are to enforce the law under the Summary Jurisdiction Act, subject to appeal to Quarter Ses- sions. Justices at Special Sessions are to grant licences for slaughterhouses, as a matter of course, where the sanction of the local authority is obtained. A " slaughterer of cattle" means a person whose business it is to kill any description of cattle, including sheep, goats, or swine, killed for use as butchers' meat. A " knacker" means a person whose busi- ness it is to slaughter any iiorse, ass, or mule, or any cattle, &c., not for use as butchers' meat. One notion is put in print — that business premises may be extended anew " half an acre," whereas it was "half their original extent in area;" but that is now altered to an enlargement without the sanction of the local authority. Great exaggeration lias also been used in reference to public slaughterhouses and the defects of pri- THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 305 vate places, whereas the raeinbers of the committee who visited several of both kinds, tbuud the latter greatly to be preferred to the former in regard to cleanliaess. The butcher who slaughters can kill when it suits him and clean up, but the public slaughterer has to meet the demands of numerous per- sons at any time, and may be always in an uatidy state, as was found at the slaughterhouses of tlie Metropolitan Cattle Market by the members of the committee who visited it. HIGHWAY LEGISLATION. At the quarterly meeting of the Notts Chamber of Agriculture, the minutes of the last meeting having been read and confirmed. Lord GalWay, M.P., the Chairman, said the attendance was probably not so large as it would otherwise have been owitg to the Lincolnshire Agricultural Society holding their show at Grantham that day. The subject put down for discussion was Higliway Legislation. lie was bound to say that he did not exactly know what that meant, because there was nothing before Parliament at the present moment which bore on that question. The subject, however, was influenced by that of local taxation, wliicli raiglit be discussed another session, and it |was no doubt highly desirable tliat this Chamber should discuss the matter. It was a great satisfaction to llicir repre- sentatives in Parliament to know their opinions on matters of this kind. It was a sort of guide to them, and although luckily they were not delegates and did not quite do wliat people told them to do, they likej to know the opinions of tlieir consti- tuents before voting on questions in Parliament. He had now to ask Mr. Gilbert to read his paper on the subject of High- way Legislation. Mr. Hy. Gilbert, of Barnby-in-the- Willows, said it was perhaps presumptuous in him to have undertaken tiie task of introducing this question, but having been requested to do so by tlie Council of the Chamber, and believing it to be worthy of their attention, he would do his best to discharge the task lie had undertaken. Mr. Gilbert then proceeded : Every public way which is a thoroughfare and common to all people is a highway, whether carriage ways, bridle, or foot ways. Sone have become so by use, some by dedication, and some are awarded roads, and a few of these are repaired by private per- sons, but the greater part are now, and have been for a great length of time, repaired by the respective parishes in which tliey are situate. In 1385anAct was passed enjoiniugthe "lords of the soil" to enlarge those ways_ where bushes, woods, and ditches were situated, in order to prevent robberies, clearly showing that the lands over which the public had a right of way belonged to the owners of the soil, which I believe is the case to this day, the public only having the right of way. An Act was passed in the reign of Philip and Mary enacting that two surveyors should be appointed annually, and the inhabit- ants of the parishes were obliged according to their respec- tive ability to provide labourers, carriages, and tools, &c., to work on the roads four days in each year under the direction of the surveyor. In the reign of Charles II. power was given to raise an assessment and the power of levying a toll was first established. In the reign of William III. and following reigns turnpike Acts were passed, and commissioners appointed to carry them into execution, and in the reign of George II. turnpikes were distinguished from other highways. In the reign of George III. the turnpike Acts were consolidated. The high- ways were repaired at the expense of the parishes, and the turnpikes at the expense of the persons using them, tolls being collected, but if sufficient could not be collected then a portion of the cost was thrown upon the parishes. The Justices of the Peace had power to inflict a fine of £5 on any surveyor not doing his duty, or not keeping the roads in good repair, and in case of his neglect to put them in repair, then they had the power to fine him the full amount the road would cost, and also the expense of a person to superintend and put the road in good order. Notwithstanding these extraordinary powers which the magistrates still retain, our county magistrates iiave adopted the Permissive Act, and divided this county into high- way districts — 25 and 26 Victoria. The district we are now in — the Newark highway district — comprises 50 parishes, and 200 miles of road. There is one surveyor (and I must say the board are perfectly satisfied with him) to superintend it, and it is not competent for the board to appoint another, unless as a deputy under him. So he has to look over 200 miles^ to see how the labour is performed, to set out the work and see it is properly done, keep books, &c. Why, the thing is perfectly impossible. Some may say, " Oh, the waywardens may look after the men ;" but if so what use is tlie surveyor at all. But the waywardens liave no authority or power except as the board may order. After giving a humorous instance of the difficulty of men working uuder two masters, the way- warden and the surveyor, he proceeded : I find that this dis- trict cost last year about £18 per mile, and the turnpike roads £32 -altogether £i,8i9. The Clerk, Mr. Newbald, has kindly allowed me to look over the expenses incurred by the fifty parislies before they were formed into a district, and I find that in the two years 1863 and 1864; the cost was £6,730. lu tlie two years ending Dec, 1873, £7,677, being an increase of £9i7, or £i73 per year. Add to lliis the cost of turnpikes ast year, £1,156, and we find £1,630 per annum in excess of the old system chargeable to this district. I attended by re- quest a few months ago a meeting of the Central Chamber in London, aird a discussion took place respecting highway legis- lation. The feeling was most decidedly against the highway district system. One gentleman from Lincolnshire stated that a deputation from the parishes had requested the justices not to form these districts, but to fiue the overseers £5 — they not having done their duty. Tlie consequence is that the roads are better looked after and ouly three surveyors have been fined. Only one district has been formed in that county — Gainsborough, and the chairman, Sir C. Anderson, has expressed his regret that that sliould have been made, and tbe gentlemen said they had declined to appoint a surveyor in their district, the waywardens performing that duty and so rendering the Act inoperative. Another gentleman placed in my hands a printed statement of the working of the Act in Worcestershire, which couuty is divided into seven districts. In one district the expenses are 6| per cent, less than in the other six districts. The e.xpenses are increased 46j per ceut. on the average. If the present Highway Boards thought the old system less expensive and preferable to the new, they should represent that to the magistrates who had still the power to deal with them. Should that be the case, aud parish surveyors were appointed, they ought to be allowed a mileage to remunerate them for their trouble. He fully accorded with the abolition of toll-bars, believing that in many cases they were expensively managed. Having referred to the Worksop and Kelham turnpikes and Newark and Leadenham asexamples, he concluded by moving the following resolutions : " Tiiat it is the opinion of this Chamber that the roads should be under parochial management subject to, the control and financial supervision of the justices or of a local or district board. That compelling the various parishes (in the highway district) to repair and maintain the abandoned turnpike roads is an act of great injustice, thereby relieving the public at the expense of the country ratepayers, and that Parliament should be requested to pay out of the public purse annually three-fourths of the expenses of repairing aud main- taining such roads to such parishes or highway districts." In reply to the Chairman, Mr. Gilbert said he would not press his resolution to a division, but he should be glad to hear the opinions of members upon it. Mr, C. Nevile (Thomley Hall) said the question of turnpikes and the maintainence of highways were matters that had not specially engaged his attention, but as a land owner and county magistrate he was compelled to have some general knowledge of these subjects. The difficulty seemed this, that assuming there was a grievance, what was the remedy ? Now add to that he might say that some years ago a great states- man asked him his opinion on a matter of importance at that time. The statesman listened to liim for a considerable time, and then asked what was his remedy ? To that he (the speaker) replied that he was only a country squire, and that ministers were paid £5,000 a year to provide remedies. In the same way they should discuss matters of this kind, and their members of Parliament were the proper persons to provide 306 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE remedies. Reveitiug to tlie questiou of highways, he thought it very hard that a small parish should be taxed for the main- tenance of a turnpike which the inhabitants never went on a single foot. He also thought the system was bad of having one surveyor in large districts. Take his own parish of Thorney. They paid a gentleman for driving about iu a gig. Why he would engage to do that work for half the money. And as to his superintending the whole of the roads, it was an impossi- bility. He suggested as he did at a meeting at which the late speaker attended, that the Highway Board should occupy the same position as the bench of magistrates, and that if com- plaints were made of a road being bad, the parish should be ordered to repair them. There was no occasion to pay a surveyor to look after them, because if there was an intelligent man in any parish lie could see the work was done. The Chairman : You have some bad roads at Thorney, have yon not ? lUr. Is'evile : Very good, my lord. There is not a better parish going. He went on to say that every parish should be left to maintain its own roads. What with the poor-rate, highway-rate, and other burdens, local taxation was rapidly increasing, and whether it fell on landlord or tenant, they were both interested, and he tliought no landlord ought to sit by and see his tenantry overburdened if he could help it. Mr. Cjripwell (Mansfield-Woodhouse) said he had had some experience in the questions raised by Mr. Gilbert. He was most familiar with tlie Mansfield district, tlie accounts of which he had now before him. He found that the Rlansfield district compared favourably with the Newark, and tliat had led him to inquire the reasons why the Blansfield district did the work so much better. It seemed to him that there was some- thing wrong in the system pursued in this locality, and that more money was spent than there was any good reason for. He made these remarks because Mr. Gilbert seemed to have based his observations on what was being done in the Newark district. Witii regard to the Mansfield district, they had 122 miles of road, whereas in Newark they had 201. The Chairman : Newark is rather an awkwardly-fixed district. Mr. Cripwell said the cost per mile for repairs only in the Manfield district was £9 7s. 6d., whilst at Newark it was £17 lis. The common charges for turnpike repairs in the Mansfield district were £3 per mile, whilst in the Newark district they were £5 15s. Probably, however, tliey had a larger proportion of turnpikes in the Newark district. With regard to salaries the Mansfield district paid £1 5s. per mile, and the Newark district only £1. They paid a lower salary per mile because the mileage was less. Their clerk's salary was £30, and the surveyor's £120 ; in the Newark district the clerk's salary w?.s £40, and the surveyor's £175. For manual labour they paid in the i\Iansfield district £5 IGs. 3d. per mile; in the Newark district it was £7 16s. ; for daily labour they paid in tlie Mansfield district £1 2s. per mile, whilst in New- ark they paid £2 12s. 8d. ; for materials (and they were rather favourably fixed) the cost per mile in the Mansfield district was £1 123. lOd., whilst iu Newark it was £G ; tradesmen's bills were 7s. per mile in tlie Mansfield district, and 13s. 8d. in this district. As far as the Mansfield district was concerned it was admitted by all, that under the new system the roads had very much improved, aud that they were getting the im- provements made at a less expense. Mr. Pinder: What kind of material do you use? Mr. Cripwell said they used the materials best adapted to the various districts. Tnry had one surveyor who looked over the whole district, but the waywarden was expected to super- vise him in his own parish, and if he had any fault to find, it was hie duty to attend the Board and make a complaint. The surveyor in their district had shown the greatest readiness to listen to any suggestion made to him. He had thought it his duty to lay this fact before the meeting, as showing how the system worked in his district. Mr. GoDBER asked whether there wais any desire in the Mansfield district to return to the old system ? Mr. Cripwell said they would be very sorry to do it. Their roads had very much improved, wliilst it had cost them no more. The Secretary, Mr. Browne, stated that he had received a letter from Mr. Walker, of Mattersea, in which he referred to the subject under discussion. The CHA.IRMA.N proceeded to read the letter. Writing from Scarborough Mr. Walker said : " I see your subject for discus- sion is ' Highway Legislation.' Under the old system of toll- bars the maintenance of the through roads was paid by those who used the roads and charged back on the consumer in the price of goods so carried. Now goods are can led by rail and the cross roads are cut up more than the through roads are. I have always held that all taxes gathered on horses, carriages, &c., should go towards the maintenance of through roads, the bye-roads being maintained by the farmers as theirs of right by usage. This is one thing to be brought forward in our Chambers, aud is on the same principle as this, that all taxes should be paid by consumers either directly or indirectly, for all are consumers but all are not producers, and any tax which presses on the fully-manufactured article is a consumers' tax, but not unless. The incidence of taxation is the first thing to be considered, and is of much more consequence than some measures which, though good in principle, interfere with free- dom of contract and drive the thin wedge into the rights of property. Conservatism should be to adopt what is right, root out what is wrong : let all the good we know of old be dovetailed with the new. Mr. Godber (Balderton) said in his opinion the whole subject seemed to resolve itself iuto two questions — ef&cieney and economy — how they could iu the cheapest and most econo- mical manner eEHciently maintain the roads. He referred to the improvements which had taken place in the condition of the roads since the time when he was a boy, when it used to be said they were up to the axletree, and he observed that there had been a great improvement under the present system, not only with regard to the material used but in the securing a greater amount of uniformity. He wished to point out that here they were in a very bad condition as compared with the Mansfield district in point of material. It seemed that the question of material made up the whole of the difference between the two districts. The questiou was, could they mend themselves by going back to the old system ? He was afraid not. He really thought that although the new system had cost a cer- tain amount more money the increased cost would not continue. He maintained that their roads would not cost them so much henceforward as they had done in bringing them to the state they were in at the present time. The surveyors were not responsible for the size of the districts, and where a surveyor acted well with a waywarden they got on very well. In his own parish, where they had an efficient waywarden, they got on very well. He did not think so much cost would be re- quired for years to come, and therefore he did not look upon this as money lost or thrown away. As to the turnpikes, it had been said tliat there was no agitation about them, that there was a great deal of dissatisfaction about it, aud it was dissatisfaction that generally grew into agitation. The question arose, how would they remedy this real grievance ? He believed the question would require a good deal of discussion before they could arrive at any satisfactory solution of it. During his last election Mr. Disraeli was asked by one of his constituents, " What about the turnpikes P" and his reply was that it was a mess. If they were a mess then, they were a mess now. It was for the agriculturists, however, to press their grievances, and to ask that some plan may be devised for relieving them of some of their heavy burdens. The education question, the sanicary regulations, and the turnpike question, had all come on during the last four years, aud they had made a difference of 6d. in the pound. He pointed out tliat every man, woman, and child paid £1 per head to local charges throughout the country, quoting Mr. Goschen to the effect that the local taxation of the country amounts to 30 millions a year, and as agriculturists paid so much to impe- rial taxation, they ought to be relieved as much as possible of local taxation, lie could not. however, bring his mind to vote for the old system of managing their highway, though he thought some more economical plan should be devised for dealing with the turnpike roads. Mr. Nevile asked whether the expenses of the new system vrere diminishing ? Mr. Godber said they were, and would do so in time to come. Lord Galway said he was much gratified at the tone the discussion had taken. Mr. Gilbert's resolution he thought from the first, was rather too general and sweeping in its cha- racter to command universal approval, aud therefore he thought that gentleman had acted very wisely in saying he would be satisfied if a discussiou took place withoait taking the feeling THE FAEMBR'S MAGAZINE. 307 of the meeting on the resolution. He tliouglit they ought to return their thanks to Mr. Gilbert tor bringing the subject forward. The more I'u'Iy these questions were discussed llie better able they were to form a judgment on them. Now, Mr. Gilbert's resolution almost seemed to express that the existence of these highway roads was very unsatisfactory to the country generally. There were two sides to the question however, and he knew there were many who considered tliat their roads were in a much better state than before. The question of expense was of course one of great consideration, and it only showed the difficulty of the subject when they heard Mr. Gilbert's figures, and the figures given by Mr. Cripwell in his excellent speech, and stating the difference between the Mansfield and Newark districts. With regard to the surveyors, it was said that it was impossible for them to go over the whole of a large district, but he world remind them that they had to keep accounts. Mr. Cripwell : Only his own, my lord, not the general account ; they are kejit by a clerk. Lord G.VLWAi : Still he would have to keep small accounts, and they required a fairly educated man to do this. One observation struck him as perfectly true, that surveyors could not be expected to see every portion of the roads kept in good order, but he must say that, as far as his judgment went, the waywardens did not exert themselves sufficiently. He would suggest that they ought to have the power to give directions to those who were repairing the road. If they saw a man acting wrongly in his work they ought to send for the sur- veyor to attend to it. (Mr. Cripwell : They do so with us.) It struck him (the noble lord) that a great deal more might be done by the waywardens if they would take a little more trouble. There was no one more alive to the advantages of local management than he was. In some of these Acts of Parliament there was too great a tendency to centralise than to leave matters in the hands of gentlemen on the spot who are able to judge for themselves. With regard to local tax- ation, he reminded them that the Chancellor of the Ex- cliequer had shown his good will to the country by putting £150,000 on one side for local expenses. That might be said to be a drop in a bucket, but still it was a step- in the right direction. They were aware perhaps a new Valuation Bill had been introduced, bringing mines, plan- tations, and game into valuation. " He told them fairly, however, that he did not see how game could be rated, except where it was let. He remarked that he had hitherto had his plantations rated as land in an un- cultivated state, aud if the Assessment Committee only used their common sense, aud act fairly to the landowners and be- tween themselves, there would be no difficulty about it, and it would be ten times better than going up to head-quarteis to know how to do it. This proposal, however, would relieve the farmer of a small amount of rate, and he only mentioned it to show that it was a step in the right direction, and to express the hope that next session, if the present Government remained in power, of which he was glad to say there was very little doubt, something would be done to benefit the agricultural as well as the urban interests. The noble lord then remarked that he took great interest in the turnpike question, having been on a committee consisting of Lord Peurhyn, Lord G. Cavendish, Mr. Wyvill, &c., and said he thought they would be acting wisely in not committing themselves on this subject, inasmuch as some general Act would probably be introduced next session. Mr. Gilbert, in reply, said he was perfectly satisfied with the discussion his paper had elicited, and now withdrew his resolution, and expressed his acknowledgments. AGRICULTURAL GEOLOGY. THE NORTHERN DIVISION. At a meeting of the Institution of Surveyors, Mr. John Glutton in the chair, Mr. E. J. Smith read the following paper : In the discussion on Mr. Squarey's excellent paper on this subject [already given], I observed that the geological formations might be conveniently identified with the letters of the alphabet, and that whether we pass from hence to Cornwall, or to Wales, or to Cumber- land, or to Scotland, we equally pass over a series of for- mations corresponding to the series of letters between V and A. The igneous rocks form part of the Scottish border, and the granitic rocks are the basis of the Cumberland mountains, and all the intermediate formations, except the old red sand- stones, will be traversed between those rocks and the forma- tions already described by Mr. Squarey. In the northern part of England, the formation which attains the greatest height and governs the climate and the directions of rivers and roads, and affected the course of traffic, is the great mountain lime- stone and Yoredale rock, corresponding to the letter £ ; the formation which is the most valuable is the coal formation identified by G ; while the new red sandstone formation (marked K) is the most extensive ; lying upon the rivers Tees, Trent, Severn, aud Mersey, and touching the tidal waters of all the three seas which guard the English shores. This mountain liruestoue range forms the Peniue change or back- hone of England, the great watershed and high ground of the north with a length of 200 miles and an extreme elevation of 3,000 feet, whence the rivers fall rapidly westwards to the Irish Sea, and, by longer courses, eastwards to the German Ocean, whilst the ancient roads from south to north run along its eastern side, guided mainly by the facilities for passing each successive eastern river. Bounded to the westward by the igneous rocks which form the Cheviot hills, this mountain limestone range enters England on the Scottish border, and extending along the eastern coast for about thirty-five miles, strikes across the western sides of the counties of Northumber- land and Durham to Crossfell, 3,000 feet above sea level, and thence enters Yorkshire above Barnard Castle. At Brough there is a remarkable depression of 1,000 feet, through which ran the British aud Roman roads from east to west, after which the range again rises to 2,400 feet, and throws a nothern arm westwards to Cockermouth on the Irish Sea. Brough is nearly the centre of the limestone range from north to south ; from Brougli to Clithero in Lancashire, it continues at its full width ; and from Ingleborough, 2,360 feet high, a southern arm is thrown across Eurness to the Irish Sea ; the main body extending south vvards to Ashbourne in Derbyshire, and reach- ing a height of 2,500 feet in that county. Detached portions of this range appear an the counties of Leicester, Gloucester, Somerset, Carmarthen, Brecon, and Monmouth, generally con- nected with coal fields ; but these portions are comparatively insignificant in extent. This formation is of more value in a geological than in an agricultural point of view, and is chiefly in pasture ; where there is sufficient soil and not too much height or exposure it is productive as arable, but this is upon only a small portion of the range. On the north side of Cross- fell, at an elevation of 1,800 feet, laud not worth one shilling per acre has been brought to ten times that value, by cutting surface drains to carry off the rain-water — some sixty inches of annual (all. At Alston, which is 900 feet above sea level, a very narrow strip of land on the South Tjne river may be worth £3 an acre, and this is surmounted by a zone of land worth 30s. to 20s. an acre, and then the hillside runs up to moorland very rapidly. Near here, at a level of 1,800 feet above the sea, the Gildersdale enclosure has remained uneffected for many years, because a recreation ground of 280 acres was considered indispensable. There is no house within two miles, and the nearest habitation is 800 feet below the com- mon. Not far from llaydon Bridge, about 500 feet above sea level, Mr. Grey, the receiver for the Greenwich Hospital Estates, has also greatly improved a large extent of land. The sheltered lands along this part of the South Tyne, rising to a level of 700 feet, are uow fair arable land^ let at from 30s. to 20s. an acre. Lands let on lease at 30s. during the high prices of 1813, were in 1822 obliged to be reduced to 20s. on account of the fall in prices. The greater part of the lower land throughout Northumberland is on this formation, and has been brouglit into good cultivation, and is admirably farmed at rents 308 THE FARMER'S MAGAZmE. averaging fully 30s. an acre. Oa that coast line are several remarkable peaks of igneous rocks (Bainborough Castle and the ruins of Dunstanborough Castle stand upon two of tliem), and where these igneous rocks form soil they are very good turnip land, worth 35s. to 40s. an acre. They are, liowever, of small extent. From Barnard Castle to Clithero, and, indeed, wherever the elevation of the limestone range exceeds 700 feet above the sea,tius formatiou is almost wholly in pas- ture ; but there are variations in its character. Near Skiptou and throughout the Craven district, it carries very good grass, worth 30s. an acre on the high grounds, and 70s. in tlie dales, and generally along its eastern side, where it is at all sheltered, it is fair pasture if well cared for. The western side is exposed and precipitous. The northern arm to Cockermouth (crossed at Shap by the Lancaster and Carlisle Railway) being chiefly at a higli level, and subject to great exposure is, perhaps, the portion least capable ot improvement. The southern arm crossing Furness, where not too much exposed to the westerly winds, presents on the contrary, some of its most favourable cultivation, for the range falls rapidly to Morecambe Bay, aud this portion is good land, chiefly under arable cultivation, at rents of fully 30s. an acre. As a general rule altitude and exposure have more to do with the unproductiveness of this formation than its natural character ; for wherever limestone soil on any formation has depth, the grass is sweet and healthy, and sheep farming can be profitably undertaken. There is very little residential value attaching to any part of this range, except where mineral springs have brought a population for medicinal purposes. On its western side, at sea level, the rain- fall ranges from 33 to 65 inches yearly ; while on the eastern aide, at sea level, the rainfall ranges from 20 to 40 inches yearly. The western side, therefore, is more suitable for the growth of grass, and the eastern side for the growth of corn. The Government returns of agricultural produce have for some years been divided into tvvo parts, the one headed grazing, and the other corn ; but the grazing division includes Northumberlaud, Durham, and the North and West Ridings of Yorkshire, on account of the large proportion of mountainous laud within them — the eleva- tion and latitude occ isioning a climate ill suited to the growth of corn. As regards minerals, this mountain limestone range comprises at the Derbyshire end four limestone strata, 1,800 feet thick, with three layers of basalt, 360 feet thick, with some lead ore and zinc. But as the range continues north- wards, the limestone strata part from each other, aud the basalt wears out, until in the vicinity of the junction of the three counties of Durham, Cumberland, and Northumberlaud, the limestone strata lie apart in sixteen beds, with 700 feet of sand and shale between tlie highest and the lowest, while the basalt is confined to one bed, 120 feet thick. At this northern end are lead ore, zinc, and some copper, and the lead ore has been so largely recovered that one-fourth of the whole annual supply of English lead has come from it. At this point also large detached ranges of iron ore, better in character tlian the Cleveland ore but not equal to the haematite iron ore, are found. At this point also seams of coal put in as the lime- stone thins out, and one of the best house coals is found in J} rt of this range, although at other points the seams contain comparatively inferior coal. I may add that the limestone strata continue to diminish after entering Scotland, and the coal strata to increase, so that in Scotland tlie greater part of the house coal is derived from tiiis formation. These coal seams have nuthlLg whatever to do with the Newcastle or witli any other of the English coal fields, being part of a pre- vious geological formation. Near the western extremities of both the arms of tliis range is found that most valuable iron ore called hieraatite. There are no certain surface indications, but pots or bowls of haematite iron ore, without connections with each other, or anything to indicate whether any one will prove to have only a trace of iron ore, or will extend to fifty or to any larger number of acres, are found and worked. This ore on the surface may be worth 30s. a ton, and by this iron ore has been raised tlie uewly-erectcd borough of Barrow-in- Eurness. It contained 200 inhabitants in 1851, and in 1871 returned to the census a population of 18,585 persons. In this borough a single order to build 1,000 new houses lias been given, and each house has been occupied as soon as finished. Having taken as our central basis the great mountain limestone range passing down the centre of the North of England, we shall find on the western coast that many earlier formations are altogether absent, and on the eastern coast that three steps take us from the oolitic series marked N, to alluvial soil marked 'L ; an interval which, in the south-east of England, requires all the intervening letters of the alphabet. I will first remark upon the country westward of the range to the Irish Sea. There are three granite rocks in Cumberland (marked A), and at the central point where Cumberland, Westmoreland, and Lancashire meet, there is the green slate and porphyry rock (marked B), and this appears to be the centre of disturbance which brought upon the surface the Cumberland mountains and their accompanying lakes. Agriculturally, this area is of little value ; but for residential purposes many sequestered nooks and sheltered lake-side spots are of a value dependent entirely on the enthusiastic temperament of the purchaser. Notiiing is more thoroughly enjoyable than a well-selected residence in the lake district. On its northern side this green slate has the before-mentioned northern arm of the mountain limestone immediately upon it, aud the coal measures (marked G) are immediately below the mountain limestone. The upper silurian, and the old red sandstoue, and tne millstone grit, above the coal, and the maguesian limestone below it (denoted by C, D, E, aud I), are all certainly absent in this district. Thes* coal measures were long used only for local consumption and for the supply of coal to Dublin. Some mines are 1,000 feet deep, and have, in part, been worked under the sea for many centuries, aud at one point the workings extend nearly two miles from the shore. Occasionally the sea breaks in and drowns a colliery — the last instance was in 1837. The coals ■ are now worked also further inland, as the facilities for railway carriage have rendered inland pits commercially practicable. The coal measures rest directly upon the conglomerate sand- stone (marked H), and this upon the new red sandstone (marked K) — the rock which lies lowest between the sea and the Cumtierland hills, aud chiefly along the courses of the rivers. The Valley of the Eden contains as good land as any in the north, letting at from 70s. to 40j. an acre, and good feeding laud is found along the rivers ; but the greater part of the higher land of the district is arable, ranging from 10s. to 30s. an acre, surmoutcd by pasture land of little value, and by mountain moorland. There are many residential situations within this area, but they are not easily accessible from the great centres of wealtii. Reverting to the before-mentioned central point, where Cumberland, Westmoreland, and Lan- cashire meet (marked B), and proceeding southwards instead of northwards, the green slate rock is followed by the upper Silurian (marked C), which is entirely wanting on the northern side, and whicli is divided into four sections, aud this rests upon the mountain limestone. The old red sandstoue, and the mill- stone grit, aud the coal measures, and the conglomerate sand- stoue, and the magnesian limestone (denoted by D, E, G, H, and I), are all absent, and the new red sandstoue (marked K) rests directly upon the mountain limestone before referred to. This new red sandstone extends southwards over the western side of the w iiole county of Lancaster, and is low-lyiug (seldom more than 100 feet above sea level), fertile, sheltered from the east winds, aud sulject to much rain, and is specially fitted for market gardens. The district in Lancashire, called the " Eilde," has for many generations been lamed for its fertility; a great part is in pasture, and there are many portions pos- sessing a high residential value, as well as the more immediate vicinities of the great towns aud of the city of Manchester. This new red sandstone continues southwards from Lancashire through Cheshire to the tidal level on the Mersey. Cheshire is, as you are aware, the great dairy county. About four- fifths ot the dairy farms are in grass, the other fifth providing the straw and the turnips, and a good dairy farm may average a rent of 38s. an acre. The land runs naturally to grass, so that a grass field, which if ploughed up in Yorkshire or Not- tinghamshire would take twenty years to restore itself, would in Cheshire become, in four years' time, indistinguishable from old pasture. The new red sandstone contiuues to Statlbrd- shire, and then sweeping round at the lowest level which would efl'ectually create a watershed, unites with the Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire, and Yorkshire red sandstone plain, which reaches the tidal level on the Trent, the Ouse, and the Tees, while another portion runs down soutliwards from Stafford- shire to the tidal level of the river Severn. This formation is sometimes a thick sandstone, and there the land is sought after for building purposes, and is very costly. The millstone grit (marked F) appears on this western side, chiefly between Clitliero and Preston, on the edge of the mountain limestone, and the conglomerate sandstone and the mag- THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 509 nesiah liraesto-^^ /"'''"■'^e'l i^^,/""^, ^\ ^'^' \ \f^''^' *^^?- o-ether abse" '^ neld, which we shall presently find on t^'"^ eastern side of the mountain limestone, seems to have ■^^'^ broken through by its uplieaval, aud is in full fpf^ on this Lancashire side. This Lancashire coal field still ^ntains 5,000 millions o I tons of coal, and if the coal in the whole of the seams existed under any one acre, and could be produced at the same moment on the surface, its value would exceed £4,000. Preston, Blackburn, Bolton, Bury, Rochdale, St. Helen's, Manchester, and the other western manufacturing towns owe their existence to this coal, and depend entirely upon its cheap production. I will now leave altogether the western side, and pass in review the formations to the east- ward of the mountain limestone. The ceveral formations, from the mountain limestone to the upper oolite, appear successively on the coast of the German Ocean, and extend in a south- westerly direction, as does also the' chalk formation. The millstone grit (marked F) fails to proceed further southward than Derbyshire ; the coal (marked G) extends with intervals as far as the Bristol Channel; the conglomerate sandstone (marked H) exists as far as the magnesian limestone extends, and both fail to appear further south than Nottinghamshire. The rest of the formations run through from the German Ocean to the Dorsetshire coast. Along the east side of the mountain limestone, from the German Ocean to Derbyshire, lies the millstone grit (marked F). Three miles, perhaps, in width from the coast at its northern extremity, it rises to an elevation of 1,800 feet, not far from Brough, about twenty miles south of the liighest elevation of the mountain limestone at Crcssfell, and forms the eastern side of the Yorkshire hills, by Hawes, Middleshaai, and Halifax ; one portion crops out under the limestone near Chesterfield, and another east of Macclesfield, near Cheadle. In Lancashire it is found, as before stated, from Clithero to Preston, and it luus up again to Ingleton, where a little de- tached plot of coal is found above it. There is little agricul- tural produce upon it, and in many parts there is peat mos*, which may become valuable when our coal is exhausted, but not till then, and a part of the range is valuable only for grouse. From want of staple and its poor character, the arable and pasture land of this formation is far less improv- able, agriculturally, than those of the greater part of the mountain limestone, but lying at a lower level it is more shel- tered. Nor are there any mineral treasures within it. The portion immediately to the south of the Tees is, however, full of residential mansions of great antiquity, lying between the Roman roads, which passed from Catterick to Wallsend at the eastern and to Carlisle at the western end of the Roman wall Next to this formation follow the coal measures (marked G). to which we owe our commercial prosperity for tlie last 100 years. The certain exhaustion of our coal in a very few years, in consequence of the enormous consumption to be occasioned by the use of steam-engines, was one of the griefs of the author of the Agricultural Survey of Lancashire, in 1793. But the use of these steam-engines enabled the recovery of thousands of acres of deep coal, and added fuel for 400 years. This formation contains little land of much agricultural value, its general characteristic being a cold, poor, wettish clay ; when in pasture, full of carnation grass ; and when in arable, expen- sive to cultivate. Lime is the only alternative calculated to render it productive, and is generally to be obtained at a mode- rate cost. Well limed, well draiued, aud well farmed, the soil is remunerative, and as soon as the tenant saves money he invests it in coal mines and gives up farming. The high price of labour, consequent on the contiguity of the coal mines, is met by the ready sale of the produce when the land lies among the collieries ; but the cost of labour, at a slight distance from the collieries, has long been to northern agriculturists au item of more importance than it has been, even during the late scarcity of labour, in the southern counties. The leading coal fields, within my limits, are those of Cumberland aud Lanca- shire before mentioned, of Durham, of Yorkshire and Derby- shire, of Staffordshire, and of Leicestershire, in addition to the first-mentioned Northumberland coal field on the mountain limestone. There are reasons for believing that all these (except the last) once formed one continuous coal field. The Durham coal field was certainly worked 700 years since for the London market. It comprises about 1,000 miles square, with two remarkable arms : one less than half a mile broad running due west, near the South Tyue, for thirty miles ; and the other extending along the coast of Northumberland due north from the main field for a distance of twenty miles, with an average width of eight miles. The main body of the Dur- ham coal crops out on the western surface, against the mill- stone grit, reaching its most distant point from the sea in the neighbourhood of Raby Castle, and gradually falls to a level of 1,500 feet below the surface of the land under the sea coast at Sunderland. It contains about 5,500 millions of tons of unexhausted coal, and the present rate of yearly consumption is about 28 millions of tons. The coal measures have been washed out from beneath the southern part of Durham and the northern part of Yorkshire, so that there is a distance of sixty miles between the sonthern end of the Durham coal field and the northern end of the Yorkshire coal field, which also crops out on the millstone grit, and falls eastwards, and there is no coal-pit east of Rotherham. But there is no geological reason why the coal should not be found further eastwards. The Yorkshire and Derbyshire coal field is one continuous range, extending eighty miles in length, and containing 1,800 square miles. Its unexhausted contents would be moderately estimated at 25,000 millions of tons, and the present consump- tion is about 25 millions of tons yearly. The Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire portion has only been largely developed since railways afforded facilities for the sale of its coal, and of the produce of its iron furnaces. New pits are now in course of being won in these districts, equal to one-fourth of those in existence within them before the late coal famine. If the Shire Oak Colliery, 1,600 feet deep, lies in the centre of the Nottingham coal basin, aud the seams rise (as is suggested) to the eastward, the whole of Nottinghamshire along the Trent, and of Lincolnshire nearly up to Lincoln, may contain workable coal. But this is very doubtful. The little but valuable North Staffordshire field lies thirty miles from the Lancashire and the Derbyshire coal fields, iu a basin, with iron furnaces aud the potteries upon it. This coal is chiefly used for manufacturing purposes, and no other article used in the manufactures for which the potteries are famous is found within the district. The chiua clay comes from Cornwall, and the pottery clay from the coast of Dorset. • Separated from the North Staffordshire coal field by a distance of thirty miles, the South Staffordshire coal field, recently enlarged by the Caunock Chase district, is next to the southward. The dis- tinguishing feature of tliis district is the ten-yard or thirty-foot coal, oa which its prosperity was founded. This seam, which is now for the greater part exhausted, divides, as it passes to the north-east, into several seams. The coal was very shallow over a great part of this South Staffordshire district, and was, therefore, won very cheaply. Tiie shale lies upoa the surface for miles together, rendering the land incapable of cultivation. Many acres are in possession of tithe- owners, because the tithe rent-charges on them are not paid ; but the possession is worthless, and the tithe rent-charge is irrecoverable. The land cannot be made available for any purpose. The Leicestershire coal field is deserving of special mention. Charnwood Forest is formed of the green slate and porphyries, which we met with in Cumberland (marked B). On eacli side of it is a small coal field, at Moira on the east and Coleorton on the vi'est, identified like the other coal fields by the letter G, aud the intervening portions, of the series of formations between B and G are wanting, or are too insignifi- cant to be recognised. The seams of coal are 50 feet thick at Moira and 40 feet at Coleorton. At Moira, at a depth of 600 feet, is a salt spring of a character very much resembling sea water, and it is raised and carried to the medicinal baths at Ashby-de-la-Zouche. The only other case of such a spring is in a coal seam under the bed of the sea ou the Durham coast, and there, as here, the water, although as salt as sea water, is composed of different ingredients. The worst clay land I know is upoa the Durham coal field. The consumption of produce by the towns of Newcastle, Shields, Sunderland, Durham, and Stockton, and by the masses of colliery population scattered about, keep the greater part of the d'strict under arable cultivation, at rents of fr3m lOs. to 30s. per acre. The same character pervades the other coal fields. Leeds, Wakefield, Sheffield, and the other manufacturing towns of Yorkshire keep up its rental value, and the masses of population congregated at the iron works of Derbyshire operate in like manner ; but the shale and sand- stone of the coal series are ungrateful to the agriculturist. Colliery sites pay at least double agricultural rents, frequently more ; and when collieries require special accommodation, they have to pay accordingly. The conglomerate sandstone 310 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. (marked H) is almost altogether absent on this side of the Penine range, and very difficult to distinguish when present. The raagnesian limestone range (denoted by I) follows the coal series on its eastern side, from the sea coast at Sunderland to nearly tlie southern side of the county of Durham, where the limestone has been washed out together with the coal forma- tion. Along the Tees the new red sandstone lies directly upon the millstone grit, from whence it is evident that the coal series and the magnesian limestone are at that point both absent. Borings have been recently made 3 miles north of Darlington to the depth of GOO feet, which have confirmed the expectation that the millstone grit underlies the new red sand- stone at that point, and consequently that there is no coal there. The magnesian limestone is found again about 20 miles south- wards at Bedale, and extends thence to Nottingham. On the eastern side of the part in the county of Durham this forma- tion is covered with clay and is generally poor ; but about Staindrop, and along the Tees Valley, and during the rest of its course it is good farming land, and well repays spirited cultivation, being worth sometimes 40s. an acre as arable land; but the value of this range may be taken as varying from 20s. to 30s. an acre, according to the depth of soil. It is a favourite residential soil, especially the eastern side, which overlooks the new red sandstone plain to the eastward. East of the magnesian limestone we return to the new red sandstone (denoted by K), which we found to a small extent in Cumber- land and largely in Lancashire, Cheshire, and Staffordshire. The portion adjacent to the magnesian limestone is residential in character, as well as those portions which attain a higher level in. Nottinghamshire and other counties. This is attribu- table to the sandy nature of those parts of the formation, which otherwise is of a purely agricultural, although very various character. On the north side of the fertile valley of the Tees the calcareous particles having been washed into it, it is generally good ; but, beyond the reach of ancient floods, it is very heavy clay, expensive to cultivate. On the southern side the bank of the Tees is less than 150 feet above the level of the sea, and theland falls continuously to tidal level at York. It is a cold clay soil throughout this range, better fitted for pasture than for arable on account of the cost of cultivation, but producing a poor thin herbage. The rents vary from ISs. to 30s. an acre. In the vicinity of towns and villages, where continuous management for centuries has to a certain extent modified its character, and in some other special situations the produce is good. Liming is indispensable, and thorough drainage relieves it of superfluous moisture, but it is very sub- ject to the uncertainties of the seasons. In Nottinghamshire, on the forest, this formation is a light sand, very agreeable for residence and, cultivated by sheep-farming, ranging from 20s. to ■' Os. an acre, and in the plain it is generally a cold strong clay, chiefly in arable, worth on an average 2is. an acre. In AVarwickshire it is in some parts perfect land for residence and for farming ; and in others cold clay, and the same in Worcestershire. The rent on land on this formation, well farmed, should seldom be less than 18s. an acre, while .£3 an acre may be regarded as the highest rent except in very exceptional cases. The mineral products of this formation are gypsum and salt. The former has been for many years worked in Cumberland and in Nottinghamshire, and the latter in Cheshire both as rock salt aud brine springs. Attempts are now being made to discover it at the south-east corner of the county of Durham ; the existence of a good salt bed at that point having been proved, and the question being only one of cost. The lias (marked L) commences at the east coast, at the northernmost point of Yorkshire, and extends, almost un- interruptedly, in a narrow band to the south coast at Lyme Regis, in Dorsetshire. It is, in the north, for the most part cold wet clay, with bands of limestone a few inches thick within it, and abounding in saurian remains, and is worth from 15s. to 25s. an acre to rent. The greater portion is in pasture, for which it is best adapted. Where the soil is immediately upon the stone, or where it is a loam rather than clay, it is pro- ductive, and such is its character in parts of Leicestershire and in the dairy districts of the West of England. The highest rent in proportion to the gross farming produce of land probably arises in the southern dairy districts on this soil. Tiie lower oolite (marked M), the next in order to the south- east, is very various in its character between the coasts of Yorkshire and of Dorsetshire. It is in the centre and south, a brown dry soil through which the rain-water runs until it meets, and is thrown out by the lias clay below. It follows that the greater part is under arable cultivat^p „.j jjj^^ it affords fair and moderately certain returns. i„ rents vary from 25s. to 35s., or even 403. an acre. Thi^^j^u-yj; j^g course there are ironstone beds. The great value ol ly^g jfQjj ore near Middlesborough is due in part to the proximity rthe Durham coal, and of the water carriage of the Tees, anu .-^ part to the quantity of the ironstone to be readily obtained by open working on the face of the hills or by drifts of moderate depth and extent. At this northern termination of this range the hills rise to an elevation of 1,500 feet abruptly from the valley of the Tees, and form a table land of the wildest kind, over the space of 300,000 acres, in the triangle be- tween Whitby, Pickering, and Middlesborough. In other parts, the elevation of this range is inconsiderable. .Middle- borough contained in 1831 431, and in 1871 39,415 inhabi- tants, and is to the east coast what Barrow is to the west coast. The intei section of Northamptonshire by railways has brought into value the ironstone long known to be present at that por- tion of the course of this formation, and there is no geological reason why this ironstone should not be found at the soutiiern end of tha formation, and carried to the coal of South Wales and of the Forest of Dean. In Yorkshire, the coral rag, and Oxford clay (marked N), are found, in the northern part of the North-Riding, only at the base of the Cleveland Hills ; but they re-appear on the south of the Humber — and the whole of the fen country soutli of the Humber — across the Wash to Huntingdon and Ely, is bassd upon the Oxford clay. The value of the fen land is maintained by the occasional digging up of the Oxford clay beneath it, and its incorporation with the present soil — a process costing on an average about £4 an acre. The rental of fen land depends chiefly upon the out- goings for drainage rates, otherwise, from 40s. to 45s. an acre would be the average rental. In Yorkshire, also, the Kimme- ridge clay (marked O) is found only along the rivers Rye and Dei went, above Malton. A very narrow bed crosses the Humber, and is a little more pronounced south-east of Horn- castle ; but, practically, this formation is absent until it re- appears near Aylesbury. One of the distinguishing geological features of this Yorkshire and Lincolnshire coast is the total absence of the whole of these formations between the Kim- meridge clay and the chalk, which, in the South of England, lie south and east of the chalk, and constitute one of the leading fields for geological investigation and discussion. The Portland and the Purbeck limestones, the Weald clay, Lnd the Hastings sands, even tiie lower green-sands and the gault, are all unknown beyond the Lincolnshire Wash, while the upper green-sand is a narrow band not always to be distinguished. The chalk (marked S) follows almost immediately on the Oxford clay (marked N), and constitutes one of the best cul- tivated and most profitable farming districts in England. From Filey to Burgh near Waiufleet, may be 160 miles, and the chalk range may average 10 miles vi'ide, and it would be very diflicult to find an ill-managed farm throughout the whole extent. Whether you think Yorkshire or Lincolnshire chalk farming the best, depends upon which side of the Humber you are born. You may take a hard day's ride on the one side or on the other without seeing any property which is otherwise than a credit to its owner aud to its tenant. The rents range from 25s. to lOs. an acre. On leaving the chalk, the other distinquishiug feature of the Yorkshire and Lincolnshire coaat presents itself. The whole of the formations which in the South of England, interpose between the chalk and the allu- vium (markek Z) — the London clay, the Bagshot beds, the crag, and the drift — are all absent, and the alluvium rests directly upon the chalk. Originally extending mxch further into the present sea, opposite Esington in Yorkshire, this allu- vial soil has been deposited at the foot of the chalk hills between them aud the sea, and is called, in Yorkshire, Holder- ness, und in Lincolnshire, the Marsh. Some of these lands may hold their own against Somersetshire and Devonshire pastures; all maintain the proverbial fertility of alluvial soil. The last accretion is that of Sunk Island, one of the most valuable of the agricultural estates of the Crown. It com- prises 6,600 acres on the north side ot the Humber, and has been almost wholly recovered within the last 200 years. About 1660 it contained 12 acres ; about 1740 it comprised 1,550 acres; about 1810 it contained 4,500 acres, and in 1854 about 6,600 acres. It has been under the charge of Mr. Higgins from that time to his recent decease, and is held in fourteen farms, with some small tenancies, at rents amounting to more than £12,000 a year. It was open to general inspection at the Royal Agri- THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 311 cultur^a Society''^^*^®®'''"" ^^ ^"^^ *'''^ ^^'^ ' *''^® buildings, cottages road" *'^^' ^"'^ general arrangements liaviug been njfi^g Ij' jyi. Iliggius after 1854, in tlie most perfect manner corapati>-'' ^'''^ ^ proper return upon the capital expended. I shall ''*v^ pleasure at any time in enabling any Member or _A.s"Jciate of the Institution to view tiiis property. In concln- nOn, speaking however imperfectly on geology, I should neglect a duty if I failed to remind you that, since we listened to Mr. Squarey's paper, we [have lost Professor Phillips, one of the most accomplished geologists, antiquarians and naturalists of the period. I would impress upon the younger Members of the Institution that, in the journeys which they necessarily take, any acquaintiince with the geology, or the antiquities, or the flora of the districts, will add a charm to their professional labours, and, not unfreqncutly, be of great value to them in their professional career. THE AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS OF IRELAND. TO THE EDITOR OF THE MARK LANE EXPRESS. SiK, — It is very natural that those who have hitherto governed in Ireland should take every opportunity of trying to prove that government a success. At every annual meeting of the Irish Koyal Agricultural Improve- ment Society, accordingly, the country is treated by the Lord-Lieutenant for the time being to statistics, with this end in view. At the recent meeting of the Irish Royal Society at Wexford, this time-honoured custom was observed, and at the first blush the statistics then quoted by his Grace of Abercorn seem to be incontro- vertible. A closer consideration of these, however, by those who know intimately the real circumstances of of Ireland, shows them to be in a great measure fallacious. It is indeed most amusing to read the Wexford speech of the Duke of Abercorn by the light of a thorough knowledge of the actual condition of the Irish people. By the speech in question it appears there is not at present a single hitch in con- nection with the social state and the Goverumeat of Ireland. Wealth is accumulating, on the authority of the statistics quoted by his Grace ; emigration is stayed owing to the good government which is abroad ; the able-bodied are leaving the workhouses, and crime is everywhere decreasing. Why then the necessity for a large standing army in the country, for a large force of armed constabulary, for a Peace Pressrvatiou Act, and for the suspension of the Constitution over a great portion of Ireland ? it may be asked. When everything is so peaceful, so happy, and so prosperous, surely the surplus army, the armed police, and the extensive application of coersive conditious of Government are superlluous, and calculated to oppress, to irritate, and to insult. But setting aside the inconsistency of governing so peace- ful and prosperous a country at the point of the bayonet and by acts of coercion, and, turning to a narrow examination of the statistics quoted by the Lord-Lieutenant at Wexford, what conclusion is to be arrived at by those most con- versant with Ireland? Simply that by these a most erro- neous and mischievous impression is sought to be conveyed. What are the facts ? Emigration is stayed because there is a monetary crisis in America, and, as the upshot, a cessation of public works and demand for labour there. The workhouses of Ireland are being emptied a very little of their able-bodied inmates, partly because of the extra British demand for labour, and partly because of the de- population of the country and of the scarcity of labour, in consequence, at home. It is grass and stock farming iu every direction, and stock have sold high, partly owing to rinderpest in England a lew years ago, partly owing to inflated trade across the Channel, and to the high prices for beef and muttsn there, as the result of that inflated trade. Irish rents have in consequence been pushing up gradually from 60 to 70 per cent., and greatly-increased grist has thereby been going into the landlord's mill. Banks have extended amazingly over Ireland withiu the last twenty years, and the o'-d-fashioned system of hoarding money privately to a large extent thereby put an end to. Profitable grazing, increased rents, and less hoarding have contributed each its share to the purchases of Government stock and to the increased deposits iu banks referred to by the Lord- Lieutenant. That is, the population of Ireland, to the extent of two and a-half millions or thereabout, has been shoved out since 1S48, and the residue of the twenty-five millions worth or so which it annually took to support these has been successfully scrambled for by the landlords and the graziers and through these parties the funds, the banks, and the probate office have been in turn enriched. Adam Smith, in his Wealth of Nations, lays down the axiom that " labour is the only true source of national prosperity and wealth." The extraordinary thing, how- ever, in connection with the Irish prosperity and increased wealth of which his Grace of Abercorn made so much at Wexford, is that labour has had little, comparatively speaking, to do with their production, for if Adam Smith is correct, the enrichment of the landlords and the graziers has been achieved at the expense of the social ruin of a nation, mainly owing to its misgovernment by an interested, shortsighted, and selfishly-calculating class. Ill fares the land, to hastening ills a prey. Where wealth accumulates and men decay . A far surer indication of what is really the present social and internal condition of Ireland is to be found in the last yeai's carrying statistics of the Irish Great Southern and Western Railway. A feather is said to shovv how the wind blows, and a falling off for the last year in the carrying trade of this extensive railway of £10,000, is of the weight of many feathers in demon- strating a falling off in ttie prosperity of the country — is of a weight, in fact, sufficient of itself to in a great measure invalidate the voluminous statistics of the Lord Lieutenant at Wexford, and at the same time to verify the saying that figures can be made to prove anything and everything almost but the truth. Contemporaneously with the speech of the Lord-Lieu- teuant at Wexford there is reported the speech of the Earl of Erne to his tenants iu the county of Donegal. Lord Erne has been in Belgium and in Switzerland, the lands of yeoman and peasant proprietors — one a Catholic and the other principally a Protestant community. In neither country have the people been shoved out that rents might be increased and landlords enriched ; and what does Lord Erue state of those thickly-populated lands and of those owners of the soil they till ? They are models, he tells his Donegal tenants, of industry, of clean and good cultivation, and of happiness, contentment, and prosperity ; valuable and important and unimpeach- able testimony to an altogether dilferent state of things from that of Ireland, is this testimony of Lord Erne. The people of these countries, and not a class, get the benefit of the wealth which, by their industry, they pro- 312 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. dace. How glad would his Grace of Abercorn have been if he had been able to show by statistics at Wexford, that the conditions of Belgium and Switzerland, as described by Lord Erne, were those of the "hewers of wood and carriers of water " of Ireland ; but he could not. Under | imperial and landlord rule, the thing hat,ijgea hlflerto is now, and ever will be, impossible. Your obedient servant, Thomas RoEEBi-r^jj^ Narraghmore, Athy, Ireland, 2!>th August. WELSH CATTLE AND CATTLE SHOWS. At tlie Tivyside Show Mr. Gwyn, for the judges, said, I am agreeably surprised by what I have seen liere to-day, by your show altogetber,and particularly by those departments in which I shared with Mr. Pryse the honour of officiating as the judges. I was quite prepared, from my former acc|uaintance with it, to find a good show altogether ; but I can and do assure you I did not expect to see so many good animals, first class animals, indeed, as I have done. In some cases they were very specially good, the merits were great and general. Mr. Pryse and myself, in many cases, had considerable trouble in coming to a conclusion. And I suppose that, even with all our trouble, there is no doubt we have made mistakes. I can mention one class — the yearling hacks — in which we bad no easy work. There were 8 or 10 animals. We brought them down to five or six, and we were both quite puzzled as to which we should award the first prize. Now the colt that we both liked was a very poor one ; and it may be some of you are dissatisfied. We believed her, however, to be the best-bred animal in her class, and that although not in good condition, she deserved the prize. The filly belongs to Mr. Blacker ; and to him, as well as to some of the other exhibitors in that class, allow me to make one suggestion, that the feeding be a little more liberal. Depend upoa it, Mr. Blacker, if you feed that filly better she will become a very fine mare. Then as to the pigs. We were asked to judge them (they were not originally in our department) when it was found that the other judges were not getting on so fast as had previously been expected. The pigs, I must tell you, were capital. They were not numerous, but I have never seen better. At Llanboidy, there were one or two pigs, perhaps, equal to some of those shown here to-day ; but they were not, even at Llanboidy, better. The prize sow was a particularly fine animal. And now I come to a class with regard to which I would make the same suggestion that I made at Pembroke. I have been rather disappointed in not seeing a better class of good real brood mares. I would say this, gentlemen, that unless you breed from a good dam, in this class as in all others, it is true you cannot expect as good an animal. Breed from a good dam. With all humility, but still with all force, I would urge on you to get abetter class of mares for your hackney classes. 01 the mares whicli we had before us to-day, there were not over three or four good ones. We weeded them down to that, and it was with no great diffi- culty ; so I think we may say tliere were not more really good mares. The mare we placed first struck us as being a remarkably good and useful animal ; and if you had ten or a dozen like her in this neighbourhood, using the valuable sires you secure the services of, I believe you would have as fine a class of young hunters in this district as you could well wish for. Mr. Prosser said, I had the pleasure of being with you and occupying the same office some six or seven years ago, and can compare the present occasion favourably with that, so far as the class of the cattle and sheep shown is concerned. The coloured cattle shown here to-day beat anything in Carmarthen, I believe. The aged cattle are not to be easily excelled ; I have not seen a better show in Carmarthen. Indeed from the excellent character of all the animals shown, I should have expected some trouble in coming to a decision iu some of the classes; but I had Mr. Jenkins and Mr. Griffiths, two very excellent judges, with me, and we iiad not the trouble which might have been expected. In the matter of the prize for coloured cows perhaps some of you may blame us. We gave it to a small cow, but she was one of the finest and most per- fect Ayrshires I have seen for a long time. I have not seen anything better in Carmarthen for some years. Some of the others were good cows, and well bred ; but they were in poor condition. There was some very good stock in sheep, and I hope we shall see those who have been exhibitors here to-day at the Carmarthen Show. Mr. Grifpiths said, I have been exceedingly pleased with the show in every way. I was very glad to find that black stock was so well represented. I was pleased to find so good black stock in the county. Eor ray own part, I would like to see our poiition better with regard to the breeding of black cattle. I am exceedingly pleased on the whole. I was sorry to find the prizes so low for the blacks, and grieved tiiat when we had a good animal before us we could not give him a prize. It may be that by another year, increased support being given to the Society, there may be no like regret. There was one thing with which I was disappointed. I was not pleased to find the cattle being turned out of the yard so soon. And, again, there was a good deal of the time spent, after the judg- ing should have been commenced, in arranging the cattle. Mr. Bagnell, with regard to the butter, was sorry there was not a greater quantity shown. It was good butter, but rather highly salted. That was a fault common in that dis- trict ; they were all given to salt their butter too highly. He was sorry there had been no cheese on which he could have passed an opinion. The dairy produce on the whole was good. HORSE BREEDING BY FARMERS.— At the show of West Gloucester Farmers' Club, Colonel Kingscote, M.P., said as regarded the department which he came there to help to judge — he meant the horses — he saw a great improvement. They all knew the price of horse flesh had very much increased. Population increased, and more people got money, and those people required horses and liked to get the best. It had often puzzled him in former years where on earth the horses could be bred, and, what was more, how on earth they could be bred to any profit for the price given for them. He did not mean the best class of horses, but such as were used in the cavalry and artillery. The utmost price given for them at one time was £30. He asked practical men how they could breed a horse at a profit for £30 ? He had asked dealers how the farmers managed to do it, and they said the fact was they bred four or five, and if they got a little money out of one of them they thought they got money out of the lot, but they lost by all. However, the time had come when they could breed a horse to some profit. He knew more capital was required than to breed oxen and sheep, but, at the price horseflesh was now, if they used their judgment carefully he felt convinced that they could breed horses at a profit. At the Gloucestershire show he himself gave 150 guineas for a three-year-old that took the first prize, and although he did not know it at the time, it was b^ed five miles from his own place, from Badminton stock, and if anybody were to write him a check for £300 for the horse he thought he should look twice at it before he took it. With regard to the evidence he had given in the House of Lords, he thought tiie money given in Queen's plates might be usefully and properly given for the encouragement of people keeping horses in different districts of the country. He added that such a price was now given by the Government for cavalry and artillery horses as to make it worth a farmer's while to keep a mare or two. REAPER TRIAL BY THE BANNFSHIRE FARM- ERS' CLUB. — This trial was the allotment half-an-acre to each reaper. The judges were : Messrs. Hay, Trochelhill, Fochabers ; Hunter, Dipple, Fochabers ; Fortune, CuUen, Bans'; Turnbuli, Smithston, Huntly ; and the folia wing the awards : Self-delivery reapers — 1, A. Gray, Floors (Woods) ; 2, Auchinachie and Simpson, Keith (Wood's new) ; 3, Jack and Sons, Maybole (improved European self-acting); 4, Ben. Reid and Co., Aberdeen (Samuelson's). Manual reapers — 1, A. Sim, Elgin (Jack and Sons) ; 2, Ben. Reid and Co., Aber- deen (Picksley and Sims) ; 3, D. M. Osborne and Co., Liver- pool (Kirby's combined mower and reaper). Oae-horse machines — 1, J. Barclay, Huntly (Kemp, Murray, and Nicholson) ; 2, Auchinachie and Simpson, Keith (Wood's new). THE FARMEE'S MAGAZINE. 318 THE WORCESTERSHIRE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT DUDLEY. Amongst the Shorthorns were the bulls Telemachus and Lord Irwin, the judges reversing the decision at Bedford by placing Telemachus first ; he was also awarded (he £25 for the best Shorthorn bull, and the Toddington Challenge Cup as the best specimen — male or female — of the breed. This champion prize had been pre- viously carried off by both the bulls who disputed its possession on Tuesday ; the owner of Telemachus having been the recipient of it at Malvern in 1871, and the owner of Lord Irwin at Stourbridge, in 1872, and at Evesham, in 1873. It must, however, be won three years in succession by the same exhibitor before it becomes his property. In the class of yearling bulls one of the sons of Telemachus came to the fore as an easy winner, and thus further proved his sire's worth as the best bull out. Next to him came Prince of the Blood Royal, a roan, the property of Mr. Akers ; Mr. Hill's son of the Grand Duke of Kent being third ; and Earl Beauchamp's Robiu Adair the reserve. The cows in milk or in calf are a small collection, headed by Mr. Outh- waite's Vivandiere, who also obtained the £10 for the best cow or heifer upon the ground. In a small class of two-year-old heifers the first and second prizes n'ere given to the Queen of the Georgians, sent by Mr. Akers, and Lord Beauchamp's Lady Adair ; the third being withheld in consequence of there being less than six entries. The yearling heifers were so inferior that they were deemed unworthy of any of the prizes offered. The Hereford bulls above two years old are only a trio, but two of them were the best of the aged bulls at Bedford. Their positions, however, are here reversed, Messrs. Fenn and Harding's Bachelor being accorded the precedence over Mr. Edwards's "\Vinter-de-Cote, and the extra £20 for the best Hereford. The first of the yearling bulls is Mr. Taylor's Tredegar, and the second iVIr. Edwards's Alfred. The cows are very good, and there was close competition between Mr. Taylor and Mr. Harding, who were respectively first and second. Only three appeared for the two-year-old heifer prizes, Mr. Edwsrds's Annie being the reserve for the extra £20 for the best of the Herefords. The first prize for pairs of dairy cows, in a class of four entries, was won by Earl Beauchamp. There is a moderate lot of Alderneys and Guernseys ; three of the prizes going to Col. Barrows, and one to Mr. Henry Parkes. The Shropshire sheep are not numerous. For pens of five breeding ewes Mrs. Beach is first, Mr. Baker second, and Mrs. Smith third. For theaves Mrs. Beach is first, Mr. Pulley second, and Mr. Firmstone third. Mr. Pulley takes all the prizes for shearling rams ; those for older rams being divided between Mrs. Smith and Mr. Firmstone. The Southdowrs are also but few, and the loDg-woolled classes consist mainly of Liucolns and Cotswolds. The show of pigs is good, and some of the awards at Bedford reversed. The most successful exhibitors of the large white breeds, are Mr. Jacob Dave, Mr. John Wheeler, Mr. R. N. Clement, and Mr. R. E. Duckering ; of the small breeds, Mr. Clement, who has the cup for the best white pig, Mr. Wheeler, and Mr. Duckering; of Berk- shires, Mr. Heber Humfrey, who is first in all the classes, Mr. Spencer, and Mr. Matthew Walker. Of horses, first came the agricultural stallions, ot which there is a good entry ; Mr. Statter's Young Champion, ^Jiird at Bedford, being first ; and Messrs. Yeoman's Pride of England, second. The other cart and dray horses are moderate. The thorough-bred stallions are limited to four entries, but they include Citadel and Laughing Stock, . who again occupy the same positions as they did "t Bingley Hall, at Bedford, and other places. Their com- • panions are Thunderer, bred by Colonel Barlow, by Thunderbolt, and Mr. T. E. Walker's Jock of Oran, a son of Blair Athol, bred by the late Mr. Blenkirou. The class for thoroughbred stallions, "constitutionally sound," which have been used in Worcestershire during 1874, or certified to be used in the county during the next next season, brought only four entries, of which Mr. T. E. Walker's Statesman was selected for the Earl of Coventry's £20 prize. In the class of hunters above five years old, equal to 15 stone, Mr. Goodlifi"s Marshal M'Mahon was still the best ; the second prize being conferred upon Mr. Hutton's Iron King ; while in the class for hunters equal to twelve stone, Mr. Ashton's The Lancer was first, and Mr. Whitehe d's Rufus second. Two prizes offered by Mr. Amos, the master of the Worcestershire Hounds, for horses the property of tenant-farmers, resident in the county, were awarded, the first to Mr. Ockey, Suckley Court, and the second to Mr Cottrill, Temple Broughton, the only candidate. In a very meritorious lot of hunters under five years old, Mr. Goo'dliff's Lady ilary, second at Bingley Hall, last week, is first, and Mr. Hayward's Richelieu, highly commended on that occasion, second. Brood mares for breeding hunters are indifferent. The first prize for roadsters, not exceeding 15 hands 2 inches, was taken by Mr. Holmes, of Beverley ; and the second by Mr. Westley. For hacks not exceeding 15 hands, Mr. Woodall is first with a black mare ; and Colonel Barrows second. The ponies aie few. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES.— Cattle : R. Doig, Lillingstone, Buckingham F.Evans, Bredwardiue, Hereford; C. Raudeli, Chadbury, Evesham. Sheep and PiRS : R.J. Newton, Campsfield Farm, Woodstock; R. H. Masf'en, Pendeford, Wolverhamp- ton ; J. Dale, Spetchley, Worcester. Horses : J. M. Richardson, Corapton Verney, Warwick ; H. Lowe, Cora- berford, Tamworth ; T.H. D. Bayly, Edwinstowe, Ollerton, Notts. Implements : B. Bomford, Pitchill, Evesham. Veterinary Inspectors: Perrins and Carlese, Worcester. CATTLE. SHORTHORNS. Best bull in Shorthorn classes.— Prize, i'25. Marquis of Exeter (Telemachus). „, ,. • r Bulls above two years old.— First prize, £10, Marquis ol Exeter, Burghley Park, Stamford (Telemachus) ; second, £5, R. Brace, Newton-of-Struthers, Forres, N. B. (Lord Irwin). Highly commended: J. W. Wilson, Broadway, Worcestershire (Earl of Warwickshire III.). Commended: J. Outhwaite, Bainesse, Catterick. _ ■ a^n Bulls, above one and under two years old. — First prize, £10, Martiuis of Exeter (Telemachus Gth) ; second, £5, B. St. John Ackers, Prinknash Park, Painswick (Prince of the Blood) ; third, £2, A. S. Hill, Oxley Manor, Wolverhampton. Cow, in milk or in calf.— First prize, £8, J. Outhwaite ; second, fi4. Marquis of Exeter (Moll Gwynne). Two-year-old heifer, in milk or in calf.— First prize, £8, B. St. John Ackers (Queen of the Georsians) ; second, £4, Earl Beauchamp, Madresfield Court, Great Malvern (Lady Adair). Yearling heifers.— First prize, £6 ; second, £4 ; third, £3. No award. , ..„ . ^ j The Toddington Challenge Cup, value 50 guineas, presented by the Right Hon. Lord Studeley.— Awarded to the Marquis of Exeter's Telemaciius. 314 THE FARMEE'SMAGAZINE. HEREFORDS. Best animal in the Hereford classes. — Prize, £30, Mr. Fenn's nged bull. Bulls above two years old. — first prize, £10, T. Fenn, Stonehook House, Ludlow, and J. Harding, The Green-house, Bridgnorth ; second, £5, Mrs. Sarah Edwards, Wintercott' Leominster (Winter-de-cote). Bulls, above one and under two years old. — First prize, £10, W. Taylor, Showle Court, Ledbury (Tredegar) ; second, £5,' H. N. Edwards, Broadward, Leominster (Alfred) ; third, £3* J, Harding. Cow, in milk or in calf.— First prize, £8, W. Taylor (Dainty) ; second, £4, J. Harding. Highly commended: T. Rogers', Coxall, Bucknell, Salop (Sunset). Corameaded : Mrs. Sarah Edwards (Young Mermaid 2nQ). Two-year- old heifers, in milk or in calf.— First prize, £8, H. N. Edwards (Annie 2nd) ; second, £4, J. Harding ■ third £2, J. Morris, Madeley, Herefordshire. Yearling heifers.— First prize, £6, H. N. Edwards (Gary) • second, £4, W. Taylor ; third, £2, J. Harding. SHORTHORN DAIRY COWS. Pair of cows, in milk, any breed.— First prize, £8, Earl Beauchamp, Great Malvern ; second, £4, T. Kingsby, Boars Croft, Tring, Herts (Seraptriana). Alderney or Guernsey bull.— First prize, a silver cup, value £5, Col. Barrows, Hagley, Stourbridge (Alderney) ; second, £2 IDs., H. P. Parkes, Castlebourne, Belbroughton, Stour- bridge (Royalty). Alderney or Guernsey cow, in milk or in calf, — First prize, £5, Col. Barrows (Goldthorne) ; second, £2 10s., Col. Bar- rows (Madcap). Best cow or heifer intlie cattle classes. — Prize, a silver cup, value £10, Mr. Outhwaite's cow. SHEEP. SIIROPSHIRE.S. Five breeding ewes, having had lambs in 1874, and suckled them up to June 1st.— First prize, £5, Mrs. S. Beach ; second, ^3, VV. Baker, Moor Barns, Atherstone ; third, Mrs. H. Smith, Sutton Maddock, Shifnal. Commended: W. F. Firrastone, Rockingham Hall, Hagley, Stourbridge. Five theaves.— First prize, £5, Mrs. S. Beach ; second, £3, J. Pulley, Lower Eaton, Hereford ; third, £2, W. F. Firmstone. Sheading ram.— First prize, £5, second, £3, and third £2, J. Pulley. Ram of any age.— First prize, £5, Mrs. H. Smith ; second, £3, W. F. Firmstone. SOUTH AND HAMPSHIRE DOWNS. Five breeding ewes, having had lambs in 1874, and suckled them up to June 1st.— First prize, £4, and second, £2, H. Sydney Waller, Farmingham, Northleach (Southdowns). Shearling ram.— First prize, £4, H. Sydney Waller (South- down). Ram of any age.— First prize, £4, H. Sydney Waller (Southdown). LONGWOOLS. Five breeding ewes, having had lambs in 1874, and suckled them up to June 1st.— First prize, £5, and second, £3, T. W. D. Harris, Wootton, Northampton. Five theaves.— First prize, £5, T. W. D. Harris. Sheading ram.— First prize, £5, and second, £3, R. Swanwick, Royal Agricultural College Farm, Cirencester (Cotswold). Ram of any age.— First prize, £5, J. Wheeler, Long Compton, Shipton-on-Stoiir (Cotswold) ; second, £2, R. Swanwick (Cotswold). Highly commended: T. w! D. Harris. The best animal in the sheep classes. — Prize, a silver cup R. Swanwick. PIGS. The best pig of white breed.— Prize, C. R. N. Beswicke- Royds, Pyke-house, Littleborough. Boar pig of large breed.— First prize, £5, J. Dove, Ham- brook (Lord Hambrook) ; second, £3, J. Dove (Sailor). Highly commended : J. Wheeler, Shipston-on-Stour. Com- mended ; C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds. Breeding sow of large breed.— First prize, £5, J. Wheeler , second, £3, R. E. Duckering, Northorpe, Kirton Lindsey. Highly commended : C. R. N. Beswi^ke-Royds. Two hilts of large breed.— First prize, £5, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds ; second. £3, J. Dove (Perfection Hilts). Highly commended : J, Dove (Roses). Boar big of small breed.— First prize, £5, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds ; second, £3, R. E. Duckering. Highly commended : G. M. Sexton, Wherstead-hall, Ipswich, Suffolk (Disturbance). Breeding sow of small breed. — First prize, £5, J. Wheeler ; second, £3, R. E. Duckering. The class corameaded. Two hilts of small breed. — First prize, £5, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds ; second, £3, Ditto. Boar pig of the Berkshire breed. — First prize, £5, H. Humfrey, Kingstone Farm ; second, £3, J. Spencer, Villiers- hill, Kenilworth. Breeding sow of the Berkshire breed. — First prize, £5, H. Humfrey ; secoud, £3, M. Walker, Stockley-park, Anslow, Burton-on-Trent. Two hilts of the Berkshire breed. — First prize, £5, H. Humfrey ; second, £3, Ditto. HORSES. Stallion cart-horse for agricultural purposes. — First prize, £15, T. Statter, Stand Hall, Whitefield, Manchester (Young Champion) ; second, £10, Messrs. Yeomans, Pennyraore Hay, Four Ashes, Wolverhampton (Pride of England). Stallion cart colt, for agricultural purposes, not exceeding three years old. — Prize, £5, S. Davis, Wollas Hill, Pershore. Cart gelding or mare, three years old or upwards, which has been regularly worked. — Prize, £5, T. E. Walker, Studley Castle, Warwickshire. Cart mare and foal. — First prize, £5, G. Thompson, The Hill, Dudley ; second, £3, T. E. Walker (Jewel). Com- mended : J. W. Webb, Cradley, Malvern (Frolic) . Cart filly or gelding, two and under three years old. — First prize, £5, S. Davis ; second, £3, G. Thompson. Dray horse, light-legged (gelding or mare), 16 hands, capa- ble of trotting six miles an hour with a load of a ton weight. — First prize, £10, G. Groves, Crookberrow Farm, Whitting- ton, Worcester ; second, a silver cup value £5, J. Smith, Bank Farm, Pedmore, Stourbridge (Snip). Thoroughbred stallion (open to all England). — First prize, £50, Lieut. -Col. Frederick Barlow, Hasketon, near Wood- bridge, Suffolk (Citadel) ; second, £10, R. Hutton, Gloucester- place, Portman-square, London (Laughing Stock). Thoroughbred stallion, constitutionally sound, that has served mares regularly in the county of Worcester during the season of 1874, or that is certified to serve mares in the county of Worcester in the season of 1875, and whose covering fee for half-bred mares has not exceeded the sum of five pounds. — Prize, £20, T. E. Walker (Statesman). Hunter, above five years old, equal to 15 stone weight. — First prize, £25, J. Goodliff, Huntingdon (Marshal M'Mahon) ; second, £10, R. Hutton. Commended : W. Whitehead, Wol- laston, Wellingborough ; C. C. Hayward, Southill, Biggles- wade (Paramoui). Huuter, equal to 12 stone weight. — First prize, £20, T. H. Ashton, Temple Laugherne, Worcester (The Lancer) ; second, £10, W. AVhitehead. Iluuter, the property of tenant farmers resident in AVorces- tershire. — First prize, £10, W. Ockey, Suckley Court, near Worcester (The Lawyer) ; second, N. Cottrill, Temple Brough- ton, Droitwich (The Claimant). Hunting mare or gelding, under five years old. — First prize, £10, J. Goodliff (Lady Mary) ; second, £5, C. C. Hayward (Richelieu). Roadster, not exceeding fifteen hands two inches, over two years old. — First prize, £10, G. Holmes, Bar House, Beverley ; second, £5, C. H. Westley, Queen's Cross, Dudley. Hack, not exceeding fifteen hands. — First prize, £5 Ss., S. Woodall, Netiierton, near Dudley ; second, £3, W. Barrows, Hagley, Stourbridge (The Pony). Pony, under fourteen hands. — First prize, £5, G. Thompson ; second, £3, J. Grove, Catshill, Bromsgrove (Quicksilver). Brood mare, for producing hunters. — First prize, £10, F. Blakeway, Stourbridge (Ledbury Lass) ; second, £5, The Earl of Coventry, Croome Court, Worcester. IMPLEMENTS. The prizes in this department were awarded bs follows: Best general collection of implements. — £5 and silver medal, J. L. Larkworlhy and Co., Worcester. Best collection of implements manufactured by exhibitor. — £5 and silver medal. Hill and Smith, Brierley Hill. Silver medals to the following : H. Webb and Co., Chemical Manure Works, Worcester ; Corbett and Peele ; R. A. Lister and Co. ; Lewis and Co. ; E. Humphries ; Wallis aad Ste- THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 315 vens; Head, Wrightson, and Co.; G. Hathaway; E. Webb and Sons ; J. Carter aud Co. At the dinner Lord Dudley, the chairman, firmly believed, and he thought he should be borne out by those who took upon themselves all the anxiety of keeping the society together, tliat, if the association had stopped in the capital of the county it would before this time have ceased to exist. It was a ques- tion however, how they could make the meeting even better than it was now. That they had found that its vitality con- sisted in moving it about instead of having one local habita- tion was something, but it seemed to him there was even more that might be done without adding very greatly to the work of those who were good enough through many years to watch over the success of the association. It must not be supposed that the visitors to the show came to look at the things that were presented to them without thinking that the arrange- ments involved much thought aud trouble, aud that honour was due to those who from one year to another were constantly studying how they could best secure the success of the society. But there was no doubt of one thing — and it was brought home to him more that day than ever before by casual remarks that were made — that the great object to be aimed at was this, that they should get such funds together as would make it worth while for the owners of the best animals to exhibit them, and at the same time would enable prizes to be given to local competitors who would not have the fear of having to pit their animals against those that were already marked with public approbation. It was not to be supposed that the two magnificent animals who were the prize-winners in the first class of beasts were brought as a mere matter of speculation ; their pre-eminence had already been attested, although number one might become two, and two become one, according to different judgments. A. great deal of love was doubtless em- bodied in such beasts, and it was natural there should be, if the prices now realised were any criterion of what a man felt towards the animal he bought. He remembered, at a sale of Lord Ducie's some years ago, £600 was thought to be an immense sum, but a fiiend of his had gone to America and brought a cow back to England at a cost of £6,000. If it were true that their love was where their treasure lay, then the man who gave £6,000 for a cow must have a certain love for it. After the birth of a calf from so valuable a mother, he must anxiously watch the development of it as to whether it was perfectly straight in its limbs and back, and whether it was capable of being made fat — because some had such natures that they could not fatten — and then he had to submit it to judges, some of whom might declare it to be number 1, while others might pronounce it number 2. There- fore, in such a society as theirs, they must see that they offered prizes worth competing for by the owners of such valuable animals, but at the same time gave something worth striving for by those living in the county who were likely to compete among themselves. He had regretted the fact that the farmers of the county did not take any very great interest in a show which was peculiarly their own. The reason, perhaps, was this, if a man had an animal which the judges would not think worthy of remark, and which, consequently, would be open to criticism, he was prevented from sending it, and the society lost the exhibition of it. Therefore he (Lord Dudley) urged that, if it were possible, they should so arrange the prizes as that they should attract competition from other counties, while they bore in mind that the society was among themselves aud for themselves, and offered inducements to men living in the county to become careful breeders. It was surely not too much to offer a £10 prize to a breeder — not that the £10 was in itself any great consideration, but it made the exhibitor a marked man among his fellows as one who chose to invest more than they of time, trouble aud money. In coming there that morning he had heard that there was a falling off in the numbers exhibited at that show, but when he came upon the ground and asked some questions — which they might suppose he did with interest, because he might be pardoned for wishing that if the society were successful anywhere it might be at Dudley — he was glad to find that, although what he had heard was to a certain extent true, the exhibition altogether was a good one. He would venture to assert that if the funds were forthcoming — and he firmly believed they would be, for the society had wanted support not among its friends but from exhibitors — and the prizes were so arranged that a man could feel that the best of what he could produce would have a fair chance of being a successful specimen, the society would be prosperoiis and long-lived. It was no longer a purely agricultural exhi- bition. There was introduced much that tickled the popular fan«y, and the jumping contests especially had large numbers of admirers, but although that part of the show was good enough in its way, and although that part of the show was good enough in its way, and although horses, as a matter of course, formed a valuable part of any such exhibition, ho trusted it would never be forgotten that the foremost object of such an association should be to improve the breeding of cattle, and next the breeding of that smaller, but equally profitable, class of animals, sheep. Mr. W. E. DowDESWELL, M.P., said when the society first left the cattle market at Worcester and went to Henwick it was really saved from ruin. There was still a large number of persons in the county who regretted that the society had an open show, and would like to have it confined to owners and occupiers resident within the county. More thau one of the judges had recoiumeuded them to adopt a new policy. They pointed out that the animals which were exhibited here bad previously been shown at the meetings of the Royal, the West of England, and other societies, and they suggested that those animals should be prohibited from being shown at the local meetings in the same year in which Ihey were exhibited at the national and large district meetings. He could not think that the prohibition for one year would make any real difference in the shows. Very few animals were exhibited a second time at the Royal or Bath and West of England shows ; after ap- pearing there they went on a local tour — he believed with great advantage to the places were they were exhibited — and. if the prohibition were adopted, it would only be postponing the present results for a year. He would wish, however, to say to the members of the society that, if they thought the present principle was not correct, and would communicate with the stewards or committee, the best attention would be given to their suggestions. He could not sit down without expressing another sentiment which had been in his mind ever since the migratory system was started, namely, that a plan which brought the agriculturists of the county every other year, and sometimes two years running, into an urban district — manufacturing, mining, or otherwise — must do a great deal to rub off those rough corners which once existed in the rela- tions between town and country populations. Lord Hampton offered his hearty congratulations to his brethren, members of the society, and to all who wished well to it, on the proof which that meeting afforded of the signal success of the migratory system. It was an excellent system, and gave a stimulus such as nothing else ever had done to their operations by calling into action not only the good feeling of those who were active members of the society and active agri- culturists, but also the interest and good feeling of the several localities in which the meetings were held. He should like also to offer them one word of congratulation on those blessings for which they had all to be thankful in connection with the present year's harvest. As regarded the wheat crop, seldom, if ever, had Worcestershire seen a better. Barley was good, and beans were not bad, and they had been blessed with the finest possible weather for getting in this great harvest. There was one crop that had not been good, and he almost thought had never been worse, that was the crop of grass. He could not help hoping that this season might teach a lesson to those who might be disposed somewhat too hastily to be alarmed by difficulties respecting labour, or difficul- ties of any other kind, to say the time was come when they must get rid of all their arable land and become grass farmers. He was afraid the grass farmers in the present year had not found the pursuit so profitable as it sometimes was. He congratulated the agriculturists of the county on the show that was before them. He was glad to hear what fell from his noble friend in the chair, and from Mr. Dowdeswell. He thought they were right in inviting the owners of the best stock in the kingdom to come there and exhibit it ; and al- though Worcestershire farmers might not be sanguine — he did not know any personal friend of his who was sanguine — of selling a cow for £6,000, still they might depend upon it that tlie exhibition of such animals as were in that show yard did act as a stimulus to making them anxious to get the best stock they could. There was one remark that hs had not; unfrequently made on such occasions, and after what he had seen that morning he could not help making it again. Whether X 2 316 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. the idea was or was not welcome, he must say, as a matter of humanity, that he shrunk from looking at the unfortunate pigs that were brought together on those occasions. lie hoped he •hould li»e to see the day when it would be one of the rules of those societies that no pig should be exhibited that was not able both to see and to stand. The Chairman did not think it would be wise, in regard to those raagnificeut animals which were the pick of the whole country, to put them on one side for a year before being brought to the local meetings. In that year they might lose much of their character from diseases which occasionally visited our herds, and which no care on the part of the breeder could avert. lie advocated the bringing such animals into competition with one another in a class of their own, and giving handsome prizes for them. They should not be brought into compttitioD with animals whose owners did not pretend to be able to rival them, for if this wer« done an act of injustice was, perhaps unwittingly, committed. What they had at heart was to improv* the prosperity of those among whom they lived, and the desire of many was that there should be a corapetitioa confined to the county. Local agriculture might be promoted in two vfays — one was to encourage the agriculturists of the county in the breeding of stock, and the other was to put before them the best proofs of what could be done when capi- tal and skill were combined. No president of an association, whether political or agricultural, or anything else, could do much good unless he was present in person and showed more than an indifferent feeling with regard to it. It was, there- fore, with the greatest pleasure tliat he found himselt able to occupy the chair that day. AIREDALE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT BINGLEY. The cattle, though not very numerous, were good, par- ticularly the aged Shorthorn bulls and cows. la the first-class — bulls over twelve months — the first place was taken by ilr. Fox's Leemau ; and the second was awarded to Lady Pigot's Rapid Rhone ; Mr. Rocket's Speedwell being highly commended, and Oxford Cheerboy, third in his class at Bedford, passed over. la the competition for Shorthorn cows and heifers over twelve months, the entries included three from Mr. T. Statter ; two from Mr. T. H. Hutchinson, Catterick ; two from Lady Pigot ; and one from I\Ir. J. 11. Rocket. The class was a very good one, and the prizes were awarded to Mr. Ilutchiusou's Dairy Girl and Lady Pigot's Victoria Victrix. A silver cup of the value of £12, for the best two Shorthorns of auy age or sex, was gained by Lady Pigot, Mr. Hutchinson's pa,ir standing second. Horses generally form an important feature at the Bmgley show, aud roadsters and agricul- tural horses were good classes. A silver cup of the value of £20, given for the best hunter, equal to not less than 15 stone, was awarded to ^Marmalade, with Mr. William Armstrong's Cashier second, and Mr. Brady Nichol- son's bay horse Wallett third, lu the second class for hunter3,'without condition as to weight, a silver cup of the value of £20 was also given ; and here Mr. T. H. Hutchin- son's Jester was first, Mr. John E. lagham's chesnut Monarch second, and Mr. E. Charlesworth's bay Bank Note third. Sheep were generally good classes. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES.— Cattle and Sheep : R. Jefferson, Preston Hows, Whitehaven ; G. Smart, Woodhouse Grange, near Abberford, South Milford. Horses : J. VVilders, Croxton Kyriel, Grantham ; E. Hird, Copeland-street, Manchester; and T. Smith, Holme, York. Pigs : J. Gledhill, Heck- mondvvike. CATTLE (Open). Shorthorn bull, over twelve months. — First prize, G. Fox, Wilmslow ; second. Lady Pigot, Newmarket. Shorthorn bull calf, under twelve mouths.— First prize, T. Statter, Manchester; second, J. Coates, Cleckheaton. Shorthorn cow or heifer, over twelve months. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson, Catterick ; second. Lady Pigot. ^ Shorthorn heifer calf, under twelve months. — First prize. Lady Pigot ; second, G. F'ox. Alderney or Guernsey cow or heifer. — First prize, E. Posselt, Shipley ; second, H. Beldou, Bingley. Two Shorthorns, any sex or age.— First prize, cup, Lady Pigot; second, T. H. Hutchinson. (Open only to the district.) Bull, over twelve months.— First prize, 11. Moulding, Bing- ley ; second, J. Horner, Bingley. Bull, under twelve months. — First aud second prize, J. Horner. Cow for dairy purposes. — First prize, T. Wilkinson, Bing- ley ; second, J. Robertshaw, AHerton Grange, near Bradford. Heifer under two years. — First prize, M. Moulding, Gil- stead, Bingley ; second, J. Horner. Heifer calf, under twelve months. — First prize, J. Horner ; second, W. Whittingham, Cottingley. HORSES (Open). Draught colt, gelding, or filly, one year. — First prize, J. E. Crowther, Knowl Grove, Mirfield ; second, E. Haley, Been Lane Head, Allerton. Draught gelding or filly, two years. — First prize, M. Lassey, Mount Tabor, near Halifax ; second, R. Hird, Shipley. Roadster colt, gelding, or filly, one year. — First prize, J. W. Mills, Clievin Grange, Menston ; second, L. Margerison, Brad- ford. Roadster gelding or illy, two years. — First prize, J. F. Crowther ; second, J. Clarke, Beeston, near Leeds. Roadster gelding or filly, three years. — First prize, J . Robin- son, Hull ; second, R. Farnhill, Batley. Draught mare or gelding. — First prize, T. Statter ; second, M. Lassey. Mare or gelding for agricultural or general purposes. — First prize, J. R, Armitage, Bradford ; second, J. Robinson, Lai?- terdyke. Mare or gelding for agricultural or general purposes, open to the district. — First and second prize, E. Towuend. Pony, in saddle, not exceeding 14 hands. — First prize, T. Mitchell, Bradford ; second, G. F. Fletcher, Sheffield. Draught stallion. — First prize, J, Edmondson, Burnley ; second, R. Marshall, Keyingham, near Hull. Coaching stallion. — First prize, T. Long, Menston, near Guiseley ; second, J. Morphet, Studfo, near Settle. Roadster stallion. — First prize, W. Vary, Stamford Bridge, York ; second, T. West, Wilberfoss, York. Cob, not exceeding 15 hands. — First prize, W. Stephenson, Cottingham, near Hull ; second, W. Sadler, Hyde-terrace, Leeds; third, W. H. Cranswick, Thornholme, near Burton Agnes. Nag or roadster. — First prize, J. Robinson ; second, W. Sadler, Vicar-lane, Leeds; third, S. Watkinson, Highgate House, Gargrave. Pony, in single harness, not exceeding 14 hands. — First prize, G. F.Fletcher; second, W.Thorpe, jun., Bingley. Horse or mare, in single harness. — First prize, T. Statter ; second, T. Marshall, Kirkgate, Bradford. Ladies' hackney, mare or gelding. — First prize, J. Wellbnrn, Scackleton Grange, Hovingham ; second, J. Terry, Bradford ; third, W. McLauchlan.Ilkley. Hunters (weight carriers), equal to not less than 15 stone. — First prize and cup, J. M. T. Musgrave, Beverley ; second, W. Armstrong ; third, B. Nicholson. Hunters, without condition as to weight. — First prize and cup, T. H. Hutchinson ; second, J. E. Ingham, Bradford ; third, E. Charleswortii, Bradford. Leaper.— First prize, J. Wellburn ; second, W. T. Tilford, jVIicklefield ; third, J.Scatcherd, Whirkirk. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 315 SHEEP. Leicsster or other LONG-WOOLLED (Open to the district only). Uam, one-ahear or aged. — First prize, E. Holden, Bingley ; second, F. H. Butterfield, Bingley. Ram lamb. — First prize, E. Lund ; second, T. Wilkiusou, Bingley. Bwe, one-shear, or aged. — First prize, E. Lund, Culling- worth ; second, J. Smith. Ewe lamb. — First prize, W. Anderton, Bingley ; second, J. Wilkinson, Bingley. LONrs (Open to the distiict only). Ram, one-shear or aged. — First and second prize, J. Smith. Ram lamb. — First and second prize, J. Smith. Ewe, one-shear or aged. — First and second prize, J. Smith. Ewe lamb. — First and second prize, J. Smith. Ilall-bred ewe, one-shear or aged. — First prize, \V. Ander- ton ; second, W. Greenwood. Halt-bred ewe lamb. — Firsts and second prize, E. Lund. PIGS (Open to the district only). Boar, any age. — First prize, W. Uracup, Saltaire ; second, G. Hargreaves, Shipley. Sow, middle breed. — First prize, N. Holmes, Bingley ; second, W. Firtli. Sow, small breed. — First prize, G. Hargreaves ; second, W. Firth. Store, under nine months old. — First prize, W. Dracup ; second, J. Leach, Bingley. Fat or store pig, confined to the parish of Bingley, and to persons in receipt of weekly wages. — l^irst prize and cup, W. Preston, Bingley ; second, M. Tiiompson, Harden, LYTHAM AND KIRKHAM AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT LYTHAM. The show, as a whole, was superior to any previously held by this Society, the total number of entries being 507, or 102 more than those of last year. The cattle were extremely good, particularly the bulls ; and the horses, especially those for agricultural purposes, showed much improvement, but better mares are wanted. Sheep and pigs were but few. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES. — Light Horses -. Mr. Atkinson, Barrowby Hall, Leeds, and Mr. Gray, Brampton. Heavy Horses : Mr. Brierley,Middletou, and Mr. Hutchinson, Catterick. Cattle, Sherf, AJMD Pigs : Mr. Dodds, Wakefield, and Mr. Ash- burner, Ulverston. CATTLE. Bull, above three years. — Prize, R. Thomson, Mythop Lodge. Bull, above two and under three years. — First prize, T. H. Clifton, Lytham ; second, N. Cartmell, Westby. Bull, above one and under two years. — First prize, T. Rigby, Carleton Lodge ; second, J. Salthouse, Westby. Bull-calf, under twelve months. — First prize, W. Porter, St. Michaels ; second, R. Thomson. Premium of £10 for the best bull, one year and upwards, the property of a tenant-farmer, and to serve in the district to the 24th June, 1875, subject to the rules of the Society. — Prize, T. Rigby. Cow, in calf or milk, having had a calf, and above three years. — First prize, T. H. Miller, Singleton Park ; second, R. Saul, Woodplumpton. Heifer, above two and not exceeding three years. — First prize, T. H. Miller ; second, R. Saul. Heifer, above one and not exceeding two years. — First prize, Jas. Sykes, Breck House ; second, R. C. Richards, Clifton Lodge. Heifer-calf, not above one year. — First prize, T. H. Miller ; second, J. T. Clifton. Cow, in calf or milk. — Prize, R. C. Richards. Three heifers, two years old. — Prize, R. C. Richards. Three heifers, one year old. — Prize, R. C. Richards. Three heifer-calves, one year old. — Prize, R. C. Richards. Silver challenge cups, to be competed for by animals entered for the foregoing premiums, and for which first prizes have been awarded only : Shorthorned male animal, of any age, the property of the exhibitor. — W. Porter. Shorthorned female animal, of any age, the property of the exhibitor.— T. H. Miller. Cottagers' cows. — First prize, J. Butler, Lytham ; second, J. Riley, Wesham. SHEEP. LongwooUed ram, other than shearling. — First prize, Hon. J. B. Ogilvy, Westby ; second, T. L. Birley, Kirkham. Shearhng longwooUed ram. — First prize, T. L. Birley; second, T, L. Birley. LongwooUed ram lamb. — Krst prize, Hon. J. B. Ogilvy ; second, Hon. J. B. Ogilvy. Shortwoolled ram, other than shearling, — First prize, T. H. Miller ; second, T. L. Birley. Shearling shortwoolled ram. — First prize, W. Dodgson, Plurapton Hall ; second, T. L. Birley. Shortwoolled ram lamb. — F'irst prize, W. Dodgson ; second, T. H. Miller. Three longwooUed ewes, any breed, to have been grazed in the district not less than three months, and to be kept for breeding. — First prize, J. T. Chiton ; second, Hon. J. B. Ogilvy. Three shortwoolled ditto. — First prize, T. L. Birley ; second, T. L. Birley. Three longwooUed gimmer lambs. — First prize, Hon. J. B. Ogilvy; second, T. L. Birley. Three shortwooUed gimmer lambs. — First prize, T. H. MiUer ; second, W. Dodgson. PIGS. Boar of large breed. — Prize, 11. Kirkham, Wrea Green. Boar of small breed. — Prize, T. Crook, Inskip. Sow of large breed. — Prize, J. Hall, Freckleton. Sow of small breed. — Prize, J. Hall. Cottagers' pig. — Prize, R. Fisher, Wrea Green. HORSES. Pair for agricultural purposes. — Prize, J. Parkinson, Lytham. Brood mare for agricultural purposes. — Prize, J. Par- kinson. Three-year-old gelding or filly for agricultural purposes. — First prize, T. Cartmell, Clifton ; second, W. Fisher, Lytham. Two-year-old gelding or filly for agricultural purposes. — First prize, W. Shaw, jun., Thornton ; second, R. C. Richards, Clifton Lodge. Yearling gelding or filly for agricultural purposes.— First prize, G. Rea, Solwick; second, J. Marquis, Wesham Hall. Colt or filly foal for agricultural purposes. — First prize, C, Fare, Clifton ; second, T. Rigby, Carleton Lodge. Brood mare in foal, or having had one in 1874, for hunting purposes. — First prize, T. H. MiUer, Singleton Park ; second, T. H. Miller. Brood mare in foal, or having had one in 1874, for harness. — First prize, T. Fox, Singleton; second, W.Taylor, Hard- horn. Gelding or mare, three or four years old, for hunting.— First prize, T. H. MiUer; second, W. S. Hodgson, Kirkham. Gelding or mare, three or four years old, for harness. — First prize, W. Cartmell, Morton ; second, J. Nickson, Ballham. Gelding or mare, three or four years old, for hackney pur- poses, exceeding U hands and not above 15 hands. — First prize, P. Catterall, Lytham ; second, R. Hall, Thistletou. Two-year-old gelding or filly for hunting. — First prize, T. H. Miller ; second, W. Taylor. Two-year-old gelding or filly for harness. — First prize, Warbrick, Lytham; second, E. Cartmell, Westbv 318 THE f ARMEY'S MAGAZINE. Yearliug geldingr or filly for liimting. — First prize, T. H. Miller ; second, H. Birley, Kirkham. Yearling gelding or filly for harness. — First prize, T. Swar- biick, Lytliam ; second, G. H. Catterall, Lytham. Colt or filly foal for hunting.— First prize, T. 11. Miller ; second, H. Birley. Colt or filly foal for harness. — First prize, T. Fox ; second, E. Billington, Myerscough. loonies, being 13, and not exceeding 14 hands. — First prize, L. Uttley, Nevvsham Lodge ; second, W. Birch, Blackpool. Ponies under 13 hands. — First prize, 11. C. Ricliatds, Clif- ton Lodge, second, Miss E. J. Birley, Kirkhara. Cups, for foals got by the thorougli-bred horse Carbineer, and by the draught horse Honest Tom. — Colt foal by Carbineer, T. Fox; filly foal by Carbineer, T. H. Miller; colt foal by Honest Tom, C. Fare ; filly foal by ditto, J. T. Chorley. Cup for best colt or filly foal by Honest Tom. — C. Fare. Premiums to be competed for only by animals entered in the catalogue of the Lytham sale. — Gelding or filly in class 1, T. H. Miller ; in class 3, T. Bradshaw, Pilling. Hunters, open to general competition, to be ridden over hurdles not more than 4ft. high, fixed in a field. — First and second prize, R. M. Knowles, Ousel Nest, Bolton ; third. Captain Fleming, 05th Regiment, Fulwood. THE BURY (LANCASTER) AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT CHESHAM. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES.— Cattle: Rev. L. C. Woods, Kirkham, B, Baxter, Elslack Hall, Skipton. Light Horses: J. S. Wilson, Taltenhall, Chester; J. Boote, Weston Hall, Crewe ; S. Leese, West Clifl'e, Pendleton. Heavy Horses : J. Noden, Dunham Massey ; Mr. Dodds, Mount Pleasant, Wakefield. Sheep : W. Midgeley, Salesbury Old Hall. Pigs : P. Eden, Salford ; S. Lord, Blue Pits. CATTLE. (Open). Bull of any breed.— First prize, G. Fox, Harefield, Wilms- low ; second,'T. Statter, Whitefield. Bull-calf, above one and under two years old.— Prize, T. Statter. Bull-calf, under twelve mouths old. — First prize, T. Stat- ter ; second, Mrs, Atkinson, Ribchestcr. Cow in calf or milk. — First and second prizes, T. Statter. Heifer, not more than three years old. — Prize, T. Statter, and J. Thom, Chorley, were equal. Heifer, not more than two years old. — First and second prizes, T. Statter. Ueifer-calf, under twelve months old. — First prize, C. W. Brierley, Rhodes ; second, Mrs. Atkinson. Ox, cow, or heifer, showing the most symmetry, fat, and weight. — First and second prizes, T. Statter. » Drove of milch cows, not less than six in number, exhibited by a cattle dealer. — First prize, P. Johnson, Great Lever; second, \V. Green, Kersal Hall. Dairy cow (special prizes). — First prize, Mrs. Atkinson; second, W. Green. Bull of any breed, above two and under three years old (district competition for tenant farmers). — First prize, D. Par- tington, ITusworth ; second, R. Alderson. Bull of any breed, above one and under two years old (dis- trict competition for tenant farmers). — First prize, L. R. Duckworth, Bank-lane ; second, L. Roston, Tottington. Bull-calf, under twelve months old. — First prize, J. Altham, Snmmerseat ; second, G. Partington, Middleton. Cow for dairy purposes, in milk or calf. — First and second prizes, A. Wardle, Bury. Heifer, of any breed, not more than two years old. — First prize, L. Hoyle, Heap ; second, J. Morris, Heywood. Geld cow, ia milk. — First prize, A. Wardle; second, D. Fletcher, Heywood. Heifer-calf, under twelve months old. — First prize, T. Taylor, Elton Farm ; second, J. Haworth, Tottington. Fat calf, under three months old. — First prize, J. Livesey, Bury; second, J. Smethurst, Bury. Lot of not less than six milch cows. — First prize, J. Taylor, Bury ; second, D. Fletcher. Lot of not less than four calves, reared by exhibitor, and not more than twelve months old. — First prize, D. Fletcher ; second, Houghton and Sons, Elton. Collection of Shorthorns, — I'irst priie, T. Statter ; second, G. Fox, Wilmslow. HORSES. (Open). Stallion, for agricultural or draught purposes. — First and second prizes, T. Statter. Brood raare, for agricultural or draught purposes. — Prize, J. Thora. Pair of horses, for agricultural or draught purposes, he. longing to one party or firm. — Piize, C. W. Brierley. Mare or gelding, over 10 hands, for agricultural or draught purposes. — Prize, C. W. Brierley. Mare or gelding under 16 hands. — Prize, T. Warburton, Haslingden. Three-year-old gelding or filly, for agricultural or draught purposes. — Prize, C. U. Cheethara, Middleton. Two-year-old gelding or filly, fsr agricultural or draught purposes. — Prize, T. Seed, Clitheroe. One-year-old gelding or filly, for agricultural or draught purposes. — Prize, T. Statter. String of four horses. — Prize, T. Statter. Thoroughbred stallion, for saddle and harness.— First prize, T. Statter ; second, A. Lund, Darcy Lever. Brood mare, for road or field. — First prize, S. Kirby, City- road, Manchester ; second, E. Fearnside, Wakefield. Roadster stallion. — First prize, T. Statter ; second, W. Varey, Buckthorpe. Mare or gelding, over 15 hands. — First prize, W. Arm- strong, Kendal ; second, S. Wilkinson, York. Three-year-old gelding or filly. — First prize, W. Stephen- son, Cottingham ; second, T. Statter. Two-year-old gelding or filly. — First prize, J. F. Crowther Mirfield ; second, E. Fearnside. One-year-old gelding or filly. — First prize, J. Nelson Broughton ; second, W. Mills, Radcliffe. Foal. — First prize, S. Kirby, Manchester; second, T. Stat- ter. Cobs and ponies, mare or gelding, not exceeding 15 hands. — I'irst prize, A. Woodhead, Bowdon ; second, W. Stephen- son, Cottingham. Pony, not exceeding 14 hands. — First prize, R. Wright, Regent-road, Salford ; second, J. M'Adam, Newton Vale. Pony, not exceeding 13 liands. — First prize, L. Pilkington, Gateacre ; second, T. Whitton, Tottington. Pony, not exceeding 12 hands. — First prize, H. Marshall, Chorlton-cum-Hardy ; second, J. Nelson, 13roughton. The prize offered by T. Statter for the best foal got by any of his entire horses was awarded to R. Chambers, White- field. Brood mare, for agricultural or draught purposes (for tenant farmers' competition, in tiie district only). — First prize, D. Partington, Unsworth ; second, L. Hoyle, Heap. Pair of horses in regular work. — Prize, J. Partington, Heywood. Mare or gelding over 16 hands. — First and second prizes, L. Hoyle. Mare or gelding under 16 hands. — First prize, W. Lindsay, Roach Bank ; second, J. Hulme, Heywood. Three-year-old gelding or filly. — Prize, Captain Bridson, Outwood. Two-year-old gelding or filly. — First prize, T. Isherwood, Holcombe ; second, D. Partington. One-year-old gelding or filly. — Prize, P. Street, Radcliffe. Foal. — First prize, D. Partington ; second, L. Hoyle. Hunters, mare or gelding, of any age (open). — First prize, W. Armstrong, Kendal ; second, J. M. Tattersall, Beverley. Cobs, not exceeding 15 hands. — First prize, T. H. Newton second, I. Hall, Lower Darwen. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 319 DISTRICT PRIZES. Pair of horses in regular work, beloaging to one party or firm. — Prize, R. Chambers, Whitefield. Mare or gelding iu regular work, over IG hands. — Prize, Walker and Loraax, Bury. Mare or gelding in regular work, under 16 hands. — Prize, T. L. Livesey, Hollins Vale. TURN-OUTS (open). Two-wheeled conveyance, horse, and harness. — First prize, T. Statter ; second, J. C. Rogerson, Oldhain-street, Man- chester. Two-wheeled conveyance, with cob under IG hands. — First prize, R. Wright, Salford ; second, R. Smith, The Poplars, Manchester. Four-wheeled conveyance, horse, and harness. — First prize, J. H. Openshaw, Stand ; second, J. Wild, Stand. Four-wheeled conveyance, pony and harness, under 14 hands. — First prize, T. Bullough, Bolton ; second, H. Mar- shall, Chorlton-cum-Hardy. PIGS. (Open). Boar, large breed. — Prize, II. Bolton, Churchtown, Roch- dale. Boar, middle breed. — First prize, and cup. Earl of EUes- mere. Boar, small breed. — Prize, Earl of Ellesraere. Breeding sow, large breed. — Prize, Earl of Ellesmere, who a'so obtained first prizes for middle and small breed. The second prize in the latter class was awarded to T. Statter. Fat hog, gelt, or sow, of any breed. — Prize, T. Bolton, Rochdale. Litter of pigs, any breed, not more than eight weeks old. — First prize. Earl of Ellesmere ; second, T. Statter. DISTRICT COMPETITION. Boar, large breed. — Prize, S. Wilson, Ramsbottom. Boar, middle breed.^First prize, and cup, S. Wilson. Boar, small breed. — First and second prizes, S. Wilson. Breeding sow, middle breed. — First prize, W. Handley, Bury ; second, S. Wilson. Boar, small breed. — First prize, S. Wilson ; second, J. Halliwell, Bury. Litter of pigs, any breed, not to exceed eight weeks old. — First prize, S. Wilson ; second, W. Handley. Fat pig, any breed, not more than eighteen months old. — Prize, J. Openshaw. Pen of store pigs, not more than, six months old. — First prize, J. Halliwell ; second, W. Howarth. Cottagers' pigs. — The best fat pig was shown by S. Yates, Huntley Brook ; and the best breeding sow by J. Nuttall, Heywood. SHEEP. (Open). Tup. — First prize, T. Brigg, Keighley ; second, J. Pickup, Kewchurch. Tup hog. — First prize, G. Dewhurst, Rawtenstall ; second, T. Brigg. Tup lamb. — First prize, T. Brigg ; second, J. Pickup. Three ewes.. — First and second prizes, T. Brigg. Three shearling ewes. — First and second prizes, T. Brigg. Three ewe lambs. — First prize, G. Dewhurst ; second, T. Brigg. Three fat wethers. — F"irst and second prizes, T. Statter. CRAVEN AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT SKIPTON. Cattle have been more largely represented, but, as re- gards the quality of the stock, this show has never been surpassed. The herd of Lady Pigot had its representatives in nearly all the classes, and succeeded in carrying olF the principal honours including the cup for the three best Shorthorns, the property of one exhibitor. In the class of best cow in calf or milk of any age, the judges reversed the decision given at the Bingley show by awarding the first position to Lady Pigot's Victoria A ictrix, over Air. T. H. Hutchinson's Dairy Girl. Mr. Hutchinson was more successful in the two-year-old heifer class, where he carried the prize with Lady Playful. In the classes of Shorthorned cattle, open to tenant-farmers only, Mr. B. Fletcher won the first place with a really handsome roan two-year-old bull. The silver cup for the best three Shorthorns in the tenant-farm classes was awarded to Mrs. Atkinson. Horses were an unusually large show. There was agood turn-out of stallions, thoroughbred, road- ster and draught, but all the awards went to exhibitors from a distance. Ihe leaping of the hunters formed as usual a great source of attraction ; but this could not be said to have been very successful. Sheep were a good show in the majority of classes, but more particularly of half-breds. The leading honours were carried off by Mr. AVilliam Varley and Mr. John Markendale — the former for pens of black-faced Scotch ewes, and the latter for half-bred Cheviots, and Mr. Henry Nutter, of Aireville Grange, Skipton, was a very successful exhibitor of half- bred lonk ewes. In the class of mountain sheep (Scotch breed), several pens of fine wethers were shown, and the class fully merited the commendations bestowed on it by the judges. Pigs were largely represented, especially in the classes open to general competition. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES.— Cattle : H. Ambler, Watkinaon Hall, Halifax ; R. Jefferson, Preston Hows, Whitehaven. Horses : Capt. Childers Thompson, The Mount, York ; T. Gibbons, Burn- foot-on-Esk, Longtown, Carlisle ; W. J. Robson, Ramshaw, Whixley, York. Sheep : C. Fawcett, Svviunythwaite, Bedale ; J. Nelson, Cockerham Hall, Laueaster ; T. Dodds, Wakefield. Pigs : J. Cnlshaw, Towneley, Burnley ; S. Barrett, Harewood. Roots, Butter, Cheese, Oatcake, Implements: J. Culshaw, Towneley; S. Barrett, Harewood. SHORTHORNS. Best bull, two years old and upwards. — First prize, G. Fox, Harefteld, Wilmslow, Manchester ; second, T. Statter, Stand, Whitefield, Manchester. Yearling bull. — First and second prizes, fiady Pigot, Branches Park, Newmaiket. Bull calf under twelve months old. — First prize, T. Statter. Cow in calf or milk of any age. — First prize. Lady Pigot; second, T. H. Hutchinson, Manor-house, Catterick. Two-year-old heifer. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson ; second. Lady Pigot. Yearling heifer. — First prize, T. Statter ; second. Lady Pigot. Heifer calf under twelve months old. — -First prize, Lidy Pigot; second, R. Lodge, Southport. Collection of Shorthorns, of not less than three in number, the l/o/ut jide property of one exhibitor. — First prize (silver cup, value 20 guineas), Lady Pigot. Bull, two years old and upwards (open to tenant-farmers in the district only). — First prize, B. Fletcher, Carlton, Yeadon, Leeds; second, Mrs. Atkinson, Dutton, Blackburn. Yearling bull. — Firstprize, Micah Lamb, Cayley (arm, Otley; second, R. Whittam, Mount Pleasant, Brierfield. Bull-calf nnder twelve months old. — First prize, Mrs. Atkin- son; second. Miss Hird, Smallhouse, Skipton. Cow in calf or milk of any age. — First prize, J. Farrer, Thorneyholme, Burnley ; second, Mrs. Atkinson. Three years old heifer in calf or milk, — First prize, 11. Birtwhistle, Skibeden, Skipton; second, T. Walker and Sons, Draughton, Skipton. Two years old heifer in calf or milk. — First prize. Miss Hird ; second, J. and M. A.. Green, Heslaker, Skipton. Yearling heifer. — First prize, Mrs. Atkinson ; second, R. Whittam. Heifer-calf under twelve months old. — First prize, Mrs. Atkinson ; second, Wm, Lawson, Beamsley, Skipton. 320 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. Collection of Shoftlioras, of uot less than three in number, the bona fide property of one exhibitor. — First prize (silver cup value 10 guineas), Mrs. Atkiason. Cattle of any Breed. Fat cow. — First prize, T. Thornton, Bradlej ; second. Miss Hird. Fat heifer. — First and second prizes, J. Wilkinson, Cook- rise, Skipton. Two store bullocks. — First prize, J. B. Beckwith, Winter- burn, Gargrave ; second, J. Harrison, Carleton, Skipton. HORSES. Thoroughbred stallion. — First prize, Robt.Huttou, Glouces- ter-place, I'ortman -square, London ; second, J. Bawman, Masongi.l. Roadster stallion. — First prize, W. Vary, Buckthorpe, York ; second, T. West, Bishoa Wilton, York. Draught stallion.— First prize, T. Stattrr, Whitefield, Man- chester ; second, R. Marshall, Keyinghara, near Hull. Brood inare for ininters. — First prize, E. Fearuside, Wake- field ; second, W. Wilkinson, Skipton. Brood mare for coaching. — First prize, Col. G. Robinson, Skipton ; second, W. H. Davis, Gargrave. Brood mare for roadsters. — First prize, S. Jaekson, Silsdon ; second, B. B. Laycock, Rylstoue. Brood mare for draught. — First prize, J. W. Waterhouse, Apperley Bridge ; second, J. Edmondson, Burnley. One year old colt or gelding for hunters. — First prize, W. G. I'erlect, Settle ; second, R. H. Gill, Silsden. One year old colt or gelding for roadsters. — First prize, O. Coates, Malhara ; second, W. Fort, Silsden. One year old colt or Alley for coaching. — First prize, G. Heyworth, Eastby ; second, N. Hitching, Cracoe. One year old colt or filly for draught. — First prize, J. Wit- taker, Trawden ; second, T. Ttiornton, Bradley. One year old filly for hunters. — Firstprize, T. Green, Cross- bills ; second, W. Roberts, Burnley. One year old filly for roadsters. — First prize, J. W. Yeadon, Fewston ; second, H. Green, Glusburn. Two years old gelding for hunters. — First prize, E. Fearn- side, Wakefield ; second, R. W. Edmondson, West Newton. Two years old gelding fur coaching. — First prize, H. Ward, Hazlewood ; second, T. Brigg, Keighley. Two years old gelding for roadsters. — First prize, G. Kayley, Sawley Bridge; second, J. B. Beckwith, G.irgrave. Two years old gelding or filly for draught. — First prize, T. Seed, Clitheroe ; second, W. L. Chester, ISradley. Two years old filly for hunters. — First prize, W. Roberts, Burnley ; second, J. M. Wilson, Crossbills. Two years old filly for coaching. — First prize, P. Parker, Crossbills ; second, Mrs. Mason, Gargrave. Two years old filly for roadsters. — First prize, G. Heyworth, Eastby ; second, W. Beck, Cracoe. Three years old gelding for hunters. — First prize. Col. G. Robinson, Skipton ; second, J. Markendale, Gargrave. Three years old gelding for coaching. — First prize, E. Airy's executors, Bel Busk; second, J. and M. A. Green, Skipton. Three years old gelding for roadsters. — First prize, J. Orrarod, Embsay ; second, J. Guy, Long Preston. Three yeara old gelding or filly for draught. — First prize, B. Fletcher, Carlton, Yeadon ; second, H. Nutter, Skipton. Three years old filly for hunters. — First prize, Capt. T. W. Lawson, Pannal ; second, J. Exley, Menston. Tliree years old filly for coaching. — First prize, G. S. Taylor, Silsden ; second, H. Ward, Hazlewood. Three years old filly for roadsters. — Prize, L. Wrathall, Appletreewick. Mare or gelding for roadsters of any age, to be ridden. — First prize, W. H. Cranswick, Burton Agnes; second, W. Stephenson, Cottenham. Cob, not exceeding 14^ hands high, to be ridden. — First and second prizes, J. T. Butler, Bui ley. i'ony, under 13 hands high. — First prize, W. Morrison, Malham Tarn ; second, W. H. Watson, Leeds. Hunters of any age. — First prize, W. Armstrong, Kendal ; second, J. Fearon, Corkicle, Whitehaven. SHEEP. LONGWOOLS. (Open.) Ram of any age.— First prize, J . and R. Earnahaw, Clithe- roe ; second, J . Styan, Bedale. (Local.) Ram of any age. — First prize, J. and R. Earnshaw ; second, R. Surr, Ripley. Shearling ram. — Prize, J. and R. Earnshaw. Tup lamb. — First and second prizes, M. Lamb, Otley. Pen of five ewes of any age. — Prize, M. Lamb. Pen of five shearling gimmers. — Prize, M. Lamb. Peu of five gimmer lambs. — Prize, M. Lamb. MOUNTAINS (SCOTCH BREED). (Local.) Blackfaced ram. — First prize, T. Hudson, Hazlewood ; second, H. Ward, Hazlewood. Shearling ram. — First prize, ^T. Hudson ; second, W. Young, Hazlewood. Tup lamb. — Prize, W. Young. Peu of five ewes. — Prize, W. Young. Pen of five shearling gimmers. — First prize, T. Young, Barden ; second, W. Robinson, Bedale. Pen of five giinu. er lambs. — First prize, T. Young ; second, W. Young. Pen of five wethers.— First prize, J. Metcalfe, Darnbrook, Arncliffe ; second, W. Robinson. LONKS. (Local.) Ram. — First prize, T. Brigg, Keighley ; second, J. Pickup, Rose Cottage, Newchurch. Shearling ram. — First prize, T. Brigg ; second, J. Smith, Keighley. Tup lamb. — First and second prizes, T. Brigg. Pen of five ewes. — First and second prizes, T. Brigg. Pen of five shearling gimmers. — First prize, T. Brigg ; second, J. Smith. Pen of five gimmer lambs. — First prize, T. Brigg ; second, J. Smith. HAXF-BREDS. (Local.) Pen of five blackfaced Scotch ewes. — First and second prizes, W. Varley, Hetton. Pen of five two-shear blackfaced Scotch ewes. — First prize, W. Varley ; second, H. Nutter, Skipton. Pen of five blackfaced shearling gimmers. — First prize, W. Varley ; second, J. and M. A. Green, Heslaker, Skipton. Pen of five blackfaced gimmers. — First prize, A. Robinson, Skipton ; second, W. Carlisle, Skipton. Pen of five two-shear Cheviot ewes. — First and second prizes, J. Msrkendale, Gargrave. Pen of five shearling Cheviot gimmers. — First and second prizes, J. Markendale. Pen of five Cheviot gimmer lambs. — First prize, J. Marken- dale ; second, W. Wilkinson, Skipton. Pen of five ewes. — First prize, J. Gill, Silden ; second, H. Nutter, Skipton. Pen of five two-shear ewes. — First prize, J. Gill ; second, H. Nutter. Pen of five shearling gimmers. — First prize, H. Natter ; second, J. Gill. Pen of five gimmer lambs. — First prize, J. Gill ; second, E. Lund, Bingley. PIGS. (Open.) Boar of the large breed. — Prize, W. Lister, Armley. Boar of the middle breed. — Second prize, H. Bell, Nelson. Boar of the small breed. — First prize, W. Hatton, Adding- ham ; second, — Graham, Leeds. Sow of the large breed. — First prize, -r- Graham ; second, W. Birtwhistle, Bradley. Sow of the middle breed.— First prize, W. Lister ; second, T. Holmes, Keighley. Sow of the small breed. — First prize, W. Lister ; second, J. Speed, Bolton Bridge. Boar of the large breed, under nine months. — First prize, J. Reeday, Keighley ; second, J. Palmer, Skipton. Boar of the middle breed, under nine months old. — First prize, W. Hatton; second, J. Reeday. Boar of the small breed, under nine months old. — First prize, W. Hatton ; second, W. Lister. Gilt of the large breed, under nine months old, for breedinj^. — First prize, J. Reeday; second, J. Palmer. Gilt of the middle breed, under nine months old, for breed- ing.—First and second prize, T. Phillip, Skipton. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 321 Gilt of the small breed, under nine mouths old, for breeding. — First and second prizes, 11. Bell. Store pig, under twelve months old. — First prize, — Graham ; second, W. Hanson, Siladen Moor. Store pig, above nine months old (open to local competition). First prize, R. Shuttleworth, Skipton ; second, L. C. Jackson, Silsden. Store pig, under nine months old. — First prize, L. C. Jack- sou ; second, J. Fort, Cowing. Gilt of the large breed, under nine months old. — First prize, J. Harrison, Cowing ; second, M. Gill, Steeton. Gilt of the middle breed, under nine months old. — First prize, T. Holmes ; second, L. C- Jackson. Gilt of the small breed, under nine months old. — First prize, J. Riley, Crossbills ; second, T. Holmes. Sow of the large breed. — First prize, T. Birtvvhistle, Brad- ley ; second, R. Shuttleworth. Sow of the middle breed. — First prize, Driver Keighley, Keighley ; second, C. Thompson, Skipton. Sow of the small breed. — Prize, T. Holmes. ROOTS. Six swede turnips. — First prize, S. Redman, Farnhill ; second, E. Fort, Hayhills, Silsden. Six white turnips. — First prize, T. Throup, Silsden ; second, J. Riley, Crosshills. Six cabbages for cattle. — Prize, W. Lockwood, Skipton. Six roots of long mangle wurtzel. — Prize, J. Kidd, Cross- hills. Six carrots. — First prize, W. Higson, Carleton ; second, J. Riley. Stone of round potatoes. — First prize, W. Thornton, Car- leton ; second, T. Eataugh, Clitheroe. Stone of kidney potatoes. — First prize, T. Eataugh ; second, C. Maud, Carleton. Stone of fluke potatoes. — First prize, W. Lockwood, Skipton ; second, E. Fort. WHITBY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. The Whitby Society is one of the oldest ia the county, having been established so far back as 1834. In the horse classes there was a very good entry, and the show of cattle was another meritorious feature, both numerically and as regards quality ; while the sheep and pigs were rather above the average. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES. — Horses — Hunters, Roadsters, and Ponies : W. Annett, Ulgham, Morpeth, and A. Dunhill, Heslerton Grange, York. — Coaching and Agricultural : J. Kirby, Burton Fields, Stamford Bridge, and R. Hodgson, Langton Grange, Northallerton. Cattle, Sueep, and Pigs : J . Cattley, Stearsby, Easingwold, and G. Hamilton, Northal- lerton. MooK Sheep : G. Prodham, Harwood Dale, and I. Garbutt, Farndale. HORSES. Thoroughbred staUion. — Prize, P. Hogarth, Lytlie. Coaching stallion. — Prize, C. Walker, Stakesby Mill. Agricultural stallion. — Prize, R. Marshall, Keyingham,Hull. Coaching brood mare, with her foal or stinted. — First prize, J. Reader, Holme, York; second, F. Stainthorpe, Newton Mulgrave. Coaching foal, colt or filly. — First prize, W. Ward, Aislaby; second, P. Campion, Overdale, Lythe. Yearling coaching colt or gelding. — First prize, M. Well- burn, Fylingdales ; second, T. Jackson, Barmby East. Yearlinct coaching filly. — Prize, P. Campion. Two years old coaching gelding. — First /irize, M. Wellburn ; second, J. Jackson, Goldsbro', Whitby. Two years old coaching filly. — First prize, J. and J. Welford, Newton Mulgrave ; second, W. Daniel, Greenhamrcerton, near York. Three years old coaching gelding. — First prize, I. Scarth, West Rounton ; second, W. S. Gray, Whitby. Three years old coaching filly. — First prize, J. Burton, Thirsk ; second, T. Dobson, Saltburn-by-the-Sea. Cleveland bay brood mare, with her foal or stinted. — Special prize, a cup, F. Stainthorp ; second, J. and J. Welford. Agricultural brood mare, with her foal or stinted. — First prize, W. Burnett, Whitby ; second, R. Dennison, Whitby. Agricultural foal, colt or filly. — First and second prizes, R. Middleton, Hawsker. Agricultural yearling, colt or filly. — First prize, T. Scoby, Kirbymoorside ; second, J. Cross, Whitby. Two years old agricultural filly or gelding. — First prize, R. P. Pet«h, Skelton ; second, T. Newton, Easington. Three years old agricultural filly or gelding. — First prize, R. Lee, Ferry HiU ; second, W. S. Gray. Pair of agricultural horses. — First prize, W.Burnett; se- cond, R. Middleton Hunting brood mare, with her foal or stinted. — First prize, J. F. Leighton, Scarbro' ; second, W. Muzeen, Slingsby. Hunting foal, colt or filly. — First prize, W. Muzeen, South Holme ; second, H. Ward, Whitby. Hunting yearling, colt or filly. — First prize, W. Muzeen ; second, J. Weighill, Whitby. Two years old hunting gelding. — First prize, J. Sedman, Pickering; second, J. Cross. Two years old huntinsf filly. — First prize, S. B. Robson, Ganton ; second, J. Dowson, Danby Castle. Three years old hunting gelding. — First prize, S. B. Rob- son ; second, J. and J. Blackbwrn, Stokesley. Three years old hunting filly. — First prize, A. Brighara, Malton ; second, E. W. Chapman, Whitby. Hunting mare or gelding. — First prize, T. Darrell, Scarbro'; second, W. S. W. Topham, Malton; third, F. J. Walker. York. Special prize for leaping. — First, J. H. Peart, Malton ; se- cond, J. Cross. Hunting mare or gelding. — First prize, H. A. H., Rastall, Ruswarp ; second, P. Campion. Gentlemen's hackney or roadster mare or gelding, over 14^ hands. — First prize, W. H. Cranswick, Burton Agnes ; second, J. Robson, Malton ; third, J. Snarry, Malton. Lady's hackney mare or gelding. — First prize, J. Wellburn, Shackleton Grange; second, C. B. Musgrave, Whitby; third, Mrs. F. J. Walker, York. Pony mare or gelding, over 12^ hands, and not over 14| hands. — F'lrst prize, M. Wellburn ; second, J.C.Hutchinson, •Middlesbro' ; third, D. Allison, Stainsacre. Pony mare or gelding, not exceeding 12 J hands. — First prize, J. Wright, Guisbro' ; second, G. Cummings, jun., Coul- dyke ; third, J. Robson, Malton. Donkeys in tlie district. — First prize, W. Blytheman, Ais- laby ; second, R. Jackson, Lythe ; third, T. Richardson, Sandsend. Special prize for the best foal by Ivory Black. — First and second, W. Ward, Aislaby. CATTLE. Bull calf, under 12 months old. — First prize, H. Clay, Northallerton ; second, J. Wood, Spaunton, Pickering. Yearling bull.— First prize, C. and J. Smith, Westerdale, Yarra ; second, W. Harrison, Underpick. Two years old bull. — First prize, J. G. S. Hebron, Wester- dale ; second, Jane Attlay, Whitby. Heifer calf, under 12 months old. — First prize, J. Hebron, Castleton ; second, C. and J. Smith. Yearling heifer. — First prize, T. Strickland, Thirsk Junc- tion ; second, H. Clay. Two years old heifer, in milk or calf. — First prize, T. Strick- land ; second, C, and J. Smith. Cow in milk or calf. — First prize, W. Rivis, Castleton ; se- cond, C. and J. Smith. District Prizes. Bull calf. — First prize, G. D. Yeoman, Whitby ; second, E. Corner, Sleights. Yearling bull. — First prize, W. Harrison ; second, G. D. Yeoman. 322 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. Four store calves — First prize, G. D. Yeoman ; second, 11. Ward, Whitby. Four yearlings. — First prize, J. Weighill ; second, E. Cor- ner, Wliitby. Two years old heifer, in milk or calf. — First prize, C. and J. Smith ; second, E. Corner. Special Prize. Pen of cattle, as follows : Cow iu milk or calf, not under four years of age ; cow or heifer in milk or calf, two or three years old ; heifer or steer, one year old ; calf, lieifer, or steer, under one year. — First prize, a silver cup, value £7 7s., C. and J. Smith; secend, JE3, J. Kerr, Lythe Hall; third, £1, E. Corner. Dairy cow. — First prize, E. Lamb, Yew Cote ; second, J. Ward, Ruswarp; third, C. Walker, Whitby. Cottager's cow of any breed, with special reference to milk- ing, the owner not being occupier of more than three acres of land. — Prize, J. Richardson, Sandsend. SHEEP. Leicesters. Two-shear or aged ram. — First prize, Messrs. Doveners, Bedale ; second, R. Tarbottom, York. Shearling ram. — First prize, Messrs. Doveners ; second, R. Harrison. Tup lamb. — First prize, W. S. Gray, Whitby ; second, Messrs. Doveners ; third, W. Ward, Aislaby. Pen of five ewes, having reared lambs in 187'i, — First prize, Messrs. Doveners ; second, Jane Attlay. Pen of five shearling gimraers. — First prize, R, Tarbottom ; second, Messrs. Doveners. Pen of five gimmer lambs. — First prize, R. Tarbottom ; se- cond, W. S. Gray. District Prize. Three Leicester tup lambs, bred by exhibitor. — First and second prizes, W. S. Gray. Moor Sheep. Two-shear or aged tup. — Prize, J. Waind, Kirbymoorside. Shearling tup. — First and second prizes, J. Waind. Tup lamb. — First and second prizes, J. Waind. Pen of five ewes, liaving reared lambs in 1874. — First prize, C. and J. Smith ; second, J. Waind. Pen of five shearling gimmers. — First prize, J. Waind ; se- cond, C. and J. Smitli. Pen of five wethers, two-shear or upwards, bred by the ex- hibitor.— First and second prizes, J. Waind. ' PIGS. Boar of any breed, under twelve months old. — First prize, W. Lister, Armley ; second, J. Cele, Whitby. Sow ot any breed, under twelve months old. — First prize, W. Lister ; second, T Strickland, Thirsk. Boar of any large breed, over twelve months old. — First prize, W. Lister ; second, D. Shaw, Moorsholm. Sow or gilt of any large breed, over twelve months old.— First prize, S. Graham, York-road, Leeds ; second, .J. Wood- cock, Egton. Boar of any small breed, over twelve months old. — First Prize, S. Graham ; second, G. Chapman, Searaer. Sow or gilt of any small breed, over twelve months old. — First prize, W. Lister ; second, G. Chapman. Cottager'it pig. — First prize, J. Cole ; second, T. Dickenson, Whitby. At the luncheon Captain TuiiTorJ, the Chairman, said that free trade was as fixed as the sun, and that the prices of 1818 would never again be experienced in this country. In his opinion, butter in this country would soon become a luxury. Wool was very remunerative, and horses were fetching fabulous prices, which proved that grass paid better than arable land, and that butter was more profitable than wheat. He believed that they had far too many fields under the plough. He was glad that the ploughmen in this district had not been dictated to by demagogues, and were content with the fair day's wage for the fair day's work which the farmers were giving them. This had obviated ill-will between the farmers and their servants, and was a matter for congratulation. WORSLEY AND SWINTON AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. In the open competition for Shorthorns the prize for the best old bull was given to Mr. R. Bruce, Newton of Struthers, Forres, N.B., for Lord Irwin ; Mr. George For, of Hare Field, Wilmslow, being second with Leeman. Mr. Fox also entered for heifer-calves, and was beaten by the Earl of Ellesmere, the only other exhibitor in the class. His lordship showed in several other open classes, and was placed second for one-year- old bulls, Mr. R. Thompson, Mythop, being first, and second in that for one-year-old heifers. Mr. Staffer, of Whitefield, won several prizes ; the first in the classes for bull-calves, two-year-old heifers, one-year-old, and first and second for three-year-old cows and Ayrshire cows. In the class for bull-calves Mr. Boddington won the second prize, and in that for cows of the Channel Islands breed Mr. H. Dunlop was first, and Mr. H. Neild second. Some special prizes were given to Mr. John Gardner for extra stock ; and in the horse and sheep classes Mr. Gardner was awarded several special prizes for stock sent for show, but not entered for com- petition. Mr. Neild was a successful exhibitor in the cattle classes, open only to farmers residing within the district. There was a large show of horses, par- ticularly in the open classes, and Mr. Statter won several prizes ; the first for the draught stallions, and second as well in this class ; the second for thorough- bred stallions, Mr. S. Norbury, Cheadle, being first; and the second in the class for mares or geldings shown in harness. The prize for the best hunter, able to carry 14 stone, went to Mr. H. Charlton, Mr. R. M. Knowles being second ; that for the best hunter, up to 12 stone, to Mr. Thos. Newton, Altrincham, Mr. Charlton being second ; that for the best mare or gelding, 15 hands high, in actual use as a roadster, to Mr. J. Robinson, Hull; !Mr. E. M. Williams, London-road Mills, Manchester, being second; that for the best roadster under 15 hands, to Mr. T. D. Pritchard, Eccles ; Mr. E. Armitage, Pen- dleton, being second ; that for the best mare or gelding in actual use as a roadster, and under 14 hands, to Mr. R. AVright, Salford, Mr. C. L. Clare, Higher Bronghton, being second ; that for the best foals of 1874 got by the entire horse belonging to Mr. A. Lund, Darcy Lever, to Mr. W. Smith, Prestwich ; that for the best pony, mare or gelding, under 13 hands, to Mr. W. S. Armitage, Hereford, Mr. L. Pilkington, Gateacre, being second ; that for the best pony, mare or gelding, under 12 hnnds, to Mr. H. Marshall, Chorlton-cum- Hardy, Mr. J. Statham, Salford, being second ; that for the best draught horse or mare to the Earl of Ellesmere, !Mr. C. W. Brierley, IMiddleton, being second; that for the best mare or gelding over 14 hands, and shown in harness, to Mr. J. C. Rogerson, Oldham-street, Manches- ter ; and that for the best under 14 hands to Mr. R. Wright, Salford, Mr. H. Marshall being second. First prizes for sheep were taken by Mr. H. Neild, Mr. Thomas Harrison (Barton-upon-Irwell), the Earl of Ellesmere, and Mrs. Ellen Edge. In the pig classes the Earl of Ellesmere took the great majority of the prizes ; but in the two classes iu which his lordship did not enter first prizes were given to Mr. G. Holland (Worsley) and Mr. D. Ashcroft (Preston), and a special prize to Mr. H. Neild. Judges — Cattle, sheep, and pigs: Mr. J. Wood- house, Scale Hall, Lancaster ; Mr. T. Dodds, Mount Pleasant, Wakefield. Light horses : Mr. W. S. Atkin- son, Barrowley Hall, Woodlesford, Leeds ; Mr. J. Bromley, Lancaster. Heavy horses : Mr. W. Carter, Grosvenor-street, Manchester ; Mr. D. Ashcroft, Haigh- ton-house, Preston. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 323 EAST CHESHIRE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT MACCLESFIELD. The horses, on the whole, were an indifferent collection , and were considerably less in number than last year; but there were some roadsters and horses for agricultural purposes. Mr. C. W. Brierley, of Middleton, was placed first in the open classes for pairs of draught horses, mares, or geldings, and mare or gelding for draught purposes. The Stoneleigh Colliery Co., of Lawton, were first in the class for three-year-old mares or geldings for draught purposes, but the competition was limited in many of the classes. In the class for two-year-old colt or tilly for draught purposes Mr. W. J. Legh, M.P., Lyme Park, won the first prize ; and in the class for stallions for draught purposes the prize for the best animal was taken by Messrs. Jos. and Jas. Wylde Pojnton ; Mr. T. Staf- fer, Stand Hall, Whitefield, near Manchester, being second. Prizes were given for the best hunter, mare, or gelding, carrying not less than 13 stone, to Mr. P. P. Brocklehurst, Macclesfield ; light-weight hunter and hack roadster, mare, or gelding, about 15 hands, Jlr. W. C. Brocklehurst, M.P., Butley Hall; cob, not to ex- ceed 15 hands, Mr. E. M. Williams, London Road Mills, Manchester; pony not to exceed 13 hands, the Rev. B. Lowther, Shrigley Park. There were also district classes. As with horses, the show of cattle was not so good as last year. The silver cup for the best bull in the yard was taken by Mr. G. Fox, for Leeman. Mr. "\V. J. Legh, M.P., was first in the open class for bulls under two years old, and second in the classes for pair of heifers under three years, ditto under two years, and pair of heifei'- calves, Mr. George Fox being first in the three last-named classes. The Stoneclough Colliery Co. took the prize for the best bull calf, and Viscount Petersham that for the best Alderney or Guernsey cow. Of the sheep, the long- woolled classes were the best, the rams of all ages being of more than the average merit ; but, on the whole, the show of sheep was an inferior one. Mr. J. Nixon, jun., Harrop, carried off all the first prizes for long-wools, with two exceptions, the prizes for the best pen of long- woolled ewes, and ditto one year old. In these classes, however, Mr. Nixon did not exhibit. In the classes for short wools, Mr. J. Hague, Gawsworth, won the prize for the best pen of five ewes ; Mr. W. J. Legh, M.P., those for rams of any age, and tup lambs ; the Rev. J. Thornycroft, Siddington, that for the best pen of five ewes, one year old : Mr. A. Gardiner, Rainow, that for the best pen of five ewe lambs ; and Mr. William Thomp- stone, Siddington, that for the best pen of five ewe-lambs. The classes for pigs were open only to members residing in the district, aod the silver cup for the best boar in the yard was awarded to Mr. D. Briscoe, of Stockport. The judges were — of cattle, Mr. Hornby, MinshuU Vernon, Crewe ; Mr. Balmer, Tattenhall ; Mr. Gilbert Murray, Elvaston, Derby. Horses (heavy) : Mr. Ball- harry, St. Helens ; Mr. Whitelegge, Ashton-on-Mersey. Horses (light) : Mr. James Boote, Weston Hall, Crewe ; Mr. Samuel Holmes, Grosvenor-street, Chorlton-on- Medlock. Sheep and pigs : Mr. M. Walker, Stockley Park, Burton-on-Trent ; Mr. William Smith, Top-o'th'- Lea, Shuttleworth. THE HALIFAX AND CALDER VALE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. There were 99 entries of cattle, and Mr. Stephen Watkinson, Gargrave, and ]\Ir. Thomas Wetherill, Dur- ham, made the awards. Lord Irwin, brought his owner, Mr. R. Bruce, the cup for the best aged Shorthorn bull ; Mr. Thomas Staffer, Stand second. In the one-year-old Shorthorns Lady Pigot took the first and second prizes with Rapid Rhone and May King. Mr. Statter, with Hero, carried off the prize for the best bull-calf, and took one first prize and one second in Shorthorn cows with his Robin's Rose and Lady Graceful. Lady Pigot took the cup and several honours in the Shorthorn cow classes, showing the best three-year-old, Victoria Victrix ; the best calf and the second best two-year-old. j\Ir. Hutchinson won the first prize for two-year-olds with Lady Playful, and the second for one-year-olds with Lady Alicia. Mr. Riley showed the best and second-best Ayrshire cow, the best and second-best dairy cow of any age, and the best and second-best in a class of miscellaneous breeds and cross breeds with a Highland Scot and a half-bred Angus and Shorthorn. Mr. Hall, Cleckheaton, showed the best Alderney, and Mr. Lewis, Halifax, the second, and was first in Guernsey cows, and Mr. E. Akroyd second. Mr. J. Wright, Warley, took a cup with three dairy cows ; Mr. Nicholls, Luddendenfoot, second. Four of the cups were for competition by farmers in the parish of Halifax and adjoining townships only. The horse show was a large one, and the judges, Mr. J. J. Clark, Welton-le- W^old, South Lincolnshire, and Mr. W. F. Barwick, Nawton, York, made the awards for hunters and roadsters ; and Mr. George Robson, Easingwold, and ;Mr. J. P. Edwards, Lytham, for coaching and draught horses. INIr. J. H. Wright won Mr. G. Davis' silver cup with Schuloff, the best thorough-bred stallion. For hunters the cup was won by Mr. W. Armstrong's Cashier ; a second prize fell to iMr. Topham, and a high commendation to Mr. F. H. Hutchinson's Jester. Mr. W. A^ary, York, showed the best roadster stallion, and won the President's cup. The best roadster mare or gelding was Mr. W, H. Blackman's, who took the silver cup. Other cups were awarded as follow : Mr. G. E. Emmett, Halifax, for the best mare or gelding for saddle or harness ; Mr. J. F. Crowther, Mirfield, for the best roadster mare aud foal, and also for the best draught stallion; Mr. C. W. Brierley, Middleton, for the best four-year-old draught mare ; Crossley and Sons for the best tradesman's or farmer's draught animal, not ex- ceeding IGj hands, aud the best pair of draught horses; Mrs. Joseph Crossley, Halifax, for the best carriage horse and best harness gelding ; Mr. John Wellburn for the best lady's pad ; Mr. W. H. Blackman for the best cob ; and Mr. G. F. Fletcher, Sheffield, for the best pony in harness. Mr. Statter, Stand, took money prizes offered for the best yearling draught colt or filly, for the second- best draught mare or gelding, and for second-best harnessed mare or gelding. Mr. Jonathan Statham, Sunnyside Works, Salford, showed the best-mounted pony not exceeding 12 hands. The wool entries are naturally of great local interest at this show. The principal exhibitors and prizetakers were Holdsworth and Cockin, Halifax; Mr. J. A. Holmes, Bradford; Daniel Parker and Co., Halifax ; W. Appleyard and So», 324 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. Halifax ; Mr. Young Ilaworlh, Halifax ; J. Eastwood and Co., Halifax. The judges were John Dewhirst, EUand, and Mr. D. Crossley, Ovenden. In the pig competitions the principal winners were the Earl of EUesmere, Mr. C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds, who divide the honours. Three first-class prizes were, however, carried off by Halifax men, Mr. George Spenceley, Mr. John Holdsworth, and Mr. John Ingham. A district competition, open to working men, was en- couraged by the presentation of two cups, and the chance of four others, opeu to nearly all exhibitors. Mr. Allen Coates, Sheffield, and Mr. Jeseph Richardson, Halifax were winners of medals, Mr. Thomas Stamper, Oswald- wistle, and Mr. Stephen Barratt, of Leeds, made the awards. There was a good show of implements, there being in the yard 179 entries. The judges, Mr. H. Ambler and Mr. John Smith, Halifax, awarded silver medals to T. Rhodes, Halifax, for a Singer sewing machine; to Hartley and Sugden, Halifax, for a chaff cutter ; and to J. Ho worth, Farnworth, for an 11 in. diameter revolving archimedeau screw ventilator. THE AMALGAMATED MANCHESTER AND LIVERPOOL AND ROYAL NORTH LANCASHIRE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT STALYBRIDGE. The entries, notwithstanding the amalgamation, were not so numerous as those of the Liverpool Society, at Chester, in 1873 ; but iu the chief feature, that is the Shorthorn section, the classes were well filled. The first prize in the aged bulls went to Lord Irwin, who has now travelled upwards of 1,200 miles in meeting engage- ments ; and besides the first prize in its class Lord Irwin was awarded the £10 cup for the best bull in the yard ; but much of the interest iu this class evaporated when it was found that Telemachus was not iu the ring ; and the second prize went to Royal Lancaster, exhibited by Mr. Edward Musgrove, Oughton, Ormskirk ; with the third prize to Mr. Linton's Sir Arthur Ingram, a two- year-old bull, which, by the conditions, was pitted against veterans. The propriety of au alteration in the rule was further shown by Mr. Outhwaite's Lord Godolphin, which being now two weeks over two years old, was shown in the class of aged bulls. There was a small entry of bulls between one and two years old, where the first prize was awarded to Rapid Rhone, and Lady Pigot was third in the same class with May King, the second prize going to Telemachus 6th. There was a small entry of bull- calves, the first prize going to Mr. Thomas Staffer for Hero. Ten entered in the class of aged cows ; the first prize being Vivandiere, to which was also awarded the £10 cup for the best cow or heifer over two years old in the yard ; while Mr. Statter was second and third with Lady Graceful and Lady Ann against the Marquis of Exeter and Lady Pigot. Another Lancashire exhibitor won in the class of two-year-old heifers with Royal Rose, and Rose of Wytham again followed Royal Rose, though Rosalbina 6th, shown by Mr. Statter, and bred by Mr. Dickinson, Wigan, was placed third. In the class of yearling heifers the honours were awarded to Robin's Rose, shown by Mr. Statter, and to Lady Pigot, with Rose of Lincoln and Princess Wytham ; while Lady Pigot was first in a fair class of calves. The premiums which the Society offers for Shorthorns exhibited by tenant-farmers principally dependant upon farming, and resident in the Society's district, did not bring a good entry, while the other breeds included Alderneys, Ayr- shires, and Welsh. The horse classes were but indifferently filled, the more especially as tested by the amount of competition. Eor thoroughbred stallions suitable for getting hunters or carriage horses the class ran to six entries. The first prize was awarded to Laughingstock, and the second to Messrs. Ambery and Cockin, Feathers Inn, Manchester, for Kid- derminster. The roadster stallions reached only to five entries, with the prize awarded to Shepherd F. Knapp, the second to J. Gill ; the roadsters above 14 hands had seven, and only four cobs were entered. Prize money amounting to £23 was offered for carriage or brougham horses, but tke class, numbering four, was very indifferent, and only one prize was awarded ; while of single-karness horses of any age there were only three exhibitors. In the class for hunters, equal to carry 14 stone, Mr. Joseph Fearon's Erl King beat Mr. W. Armstrong's Cashier ! and Loiterer, shown by Messrs. W. Thompson and Son, was put third. In the class for hunters up to 12 stone, the first prize was given to Jester, shown by Mr. T. H. Hutchinson, of Catterick, for which, as the best huuter in the yard, the £25 cup was also awarded. Prizes were oft'ered by the Staleybridge local committee for hunters shown by residents within the local district, which commanded a fair entry. The sheep classes included some good Shropshires from Messrs. Baker, Nock, and Firmstoue ; aud a very mixed lot in the longwool classes of Leieesters, Lincolns, and Cotswolds ; Mr. Hutchinson, of Catterick, having a long lead with his capital type of Leicester, and taking all the chief prizes alike for rams and ewes. The competi- tion here again was iu fact but indifferent, and the local display of sheep simply noticeable as a curiosity. The pig show was stronger, supported as it was by many of our most famous exhibitors, including, as the prize-list will tell, Messrs. Howard, Duckering, Royds, Matthew Walker, Peter Eden, Wheeler, Lord EUesmere, and Mr. Rose, a new exhibitor from Norfolk. Over what The Manchester Exa7niner calls " the sometimes too much neglected implements," money prizes are given in very few instances, but the distribution of silver medals was duly appreciated by the successful exhibitors. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES.— Shorthorns : G. H. Sanday, Bedale ; T. Dodds, Wakefield. Other breeds or cross-breds : J. Roberts, Saltney ; J. Gardner, Worsley, Manchester. Light Horses : W. S. Atkinson, Leeds ; J. Bromley, Lancaster. Cart Horses: R. S.Reynolds, Liverpool; T.J. Rider, Kenwick, Shrewsbury. Sheep : C Byrd, Littywood ; E. Riley, Kipling Coates. Pigs: J. Birch, Sefton; J. Fisher, Cross Hills. Poultry: — . Teebay, FuUwood. Pigeons: M. Hedley, Redhill. Dogs: M. Hedley ; R. Gorton, Eccles ; W. Lort, Birmingham. Harriers : C. B. Speight, Stannington ; S- Ridge, Sheffield. Farm and Garden Produce : E. Rothwell, Winwick ; J. Hornby, MinshuU Vernon. Cheese : R. Pedley, Crewe. Butter : G. Jennison, Belle Vue, Manchester ; T. Muirhead, Man- chester. Implements : J. Wright, Croxteth ; R. Mauds- ley, Eccleston ; U. T. Smith, Whitchurch. CATTLE. Shorthorns. Bull, above two years old. — Firstprize, £15, and extra prize, R. Bruce, Newton-ofStruthers, Forres (Lord Irwin^ ; second. £10, E. Musgrove, Aughtou, Ormskirk (Royal Lancaster) ; third, £5, W. Linton, Sheriff Button, York (Sir Arthur In- Rram). Highly commended : J. Outhwaite, Bainesse, Catt«- THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 325 rick (Lord Godolphin). Commended: B. St. John Ackers, Painswiek (Cymbeline). Bull, above one but under tsvo years old. — First prize, £15, Lady Pigot, Branches Park (Rapid Rhone) ; second, £10, Marquis of Exeter, Bur^hley Park (Telemachus 6th) ; third, £5, Lady Pigot (May King). Bull calf, above six and under twelve months old. — First prize, £6, T. Statter, Stand Hall (Hero) ; second, £4, J. Coates, Hartshead, Cleckheaton ; third, £2, 11. Tliompson, Mythorp Lodge, Blackpool (Winsome's Heir). Cow, above three years old, in milk or in calf. — First prize, £8, and extra prize, J. Onthwaite, Bainesse (Vivandiere) ; spcond, £6, T. Statter (Lady Graceful) ; third, £+, T. Statter (Lady Ann). Highly commended: Marquis of Exeter (Sea Gull). Heifer, two years old hut nnder three. — First prize, £8, J. Thorn, Larkhill, Chorley (Royal Rose) ; second, £0, Lady Pigot (Rose of Witham) ; third, £4., T. Statter (Rosalbina 6th). Commended : B. St. John Ackers, Painswiek (Queen of the Georgians). Heifer, above one but under two years old. — First prize, £6, T. Statter (Robin's Rose) ; second, £4, Lady Pigot (Rose of Lincoln) ; third, £2, Lady Pigot (Princess of Witham). Highly commended : T. Statter (Robin's Stanley Rose). Heifer calf, above six but under twelve months old. — First prize, £5, Lady Pigot (Moorish Captive) ; second, £3 , G. Fox, Harefield (Lady Faverley 6th) ; third, £2, W. J. Legh, M.P., Lyme Park, Disley (Jessamin). Commended: B. St. John Ackers (Lady Carew.) OTHER BREEDS. Channel Islands bull, of any age. — Silver medal, T. H. Miller, Poulton-le-Fyide (Mentor). Highly commmeded : R. H. Norreys, Davey Hulme Hall. Ayrshire bull of any age. — Silver medal, T. Statter. Welsh bull of any age. — Silver medal, R. Humplireys, Bedd- gelert (Prince Llewelyn). Channel Islands' cow or heifer of any age. — Fir.st prize, £5, A. Hall, Cleckheaton ; second, £3, R. Smith, The Poplars, Manchester. Commended : T. H. Miller, Singleton Park (Maid of the Mist). Ayrshire cow or heifer, of any age — First prize, £5, T. Statter (Dairymaid) ; second, £3, T. Statter (Buttercup). Welsh cow or heifer, of any age. — First prize, R. Hum- phreys ; second, £3, G. Jones, Mold (Pride). Commended : R. Humphreys. LOCAL PRIZES. A piece of plate, value £ 10, to the best bull in any of the fore- going classes, for Lord Irwin. Ditto, value £5, to the best cow or heifer above two years old, for Vivandiere. Ditto, value £5, to the best heifer or heifer-calf under two years old, for Robin's Rose. HORSES. Young horses for road and field, three years old, gelding or filly. — First and second prizes, C. E. Ashworth, Fairfield, Manchester; third, J. F. Crowther, Kuowl Grove, Mirfield. Two years old, gelding or filly. — First prize, T. F. Jackson, Tattenhall Hall, Chester; second, J. F. Crowther. Cart horses (open), stallions for getting cart or waggon horses (prize money £45). — T. Statter, Staid Hall ; second, F. Crowther; third, R. Hopper, North Bank, Whittlesey, near Peterborough. Stallion colts, foaled in 1871. — First prize, J. and J. Wylde, Worth Hall, Poynton, Stockport ; second, T. Statter. StaUion colts, foaled in 1872. — This was a poor class, and only the third prize was awarded, to J. Gould, Hyde Hall, Denton. Stallion colts, foaled in 1873. — First prize, T. Statter ; second, J. F. Crowther; third, J. Tomlinson, Lutton Marsh. Pairs of horses, mares, ot geldings, for farm work, property of tenant-farmers principally dependent on farming. — First prize, W. Birch, Aintree, Liverpool ; second, J. Partington, Whittalfold, Birch, Middleton. Cart horse, four years old, or upwards, mare or gelding, property of tenant-farmers principally dependant on farmiug. — First prize, H. Nield, Worsley ; second, J. Waterworth, North Ashton, Wigan ; third, J. Pover, Elton Hall, Chester. Pairs of waggon horses, mares or geldings, most suitable for heavy town work. — First prize, T. George, Wellington Saw Mills ; second and third, C W. Brierley, Rhodes House, Middleton. Cart or van horse, four years old or upwards, mare or gelding. — First prize, C. W. Brierley ; second, T. Statter ; third, J. W. Crosby, Crosby Green. Van horse, four years old or upwards, mare or gelding. — Prize, C. \V. Brierley (only entry). Young horses, three years old, cart breed, gelding or filly . — First prize, G. Prescott, MinshiiU Vernon, Middlewich ; second, W. Birch, Aintree ; third, E. Waterworth, Brimelow Farm, Wigan. Two years old, cart breed, gelding or filly. — First prize, J. Walsh, Moss House, Upper Rawcliffe, Garstang ; second and third, T. Seed, Bashall Town, Clitheroe. One year old, cart breed, gelding or filly. — First prize, T. Statter ; second, J. and F. Crowther. Brood mares, cart mare with foal at foot. — First prize, J. Tomlinson, Sutton Marsh (foal and mare) ; second, T. Statter (foal and mare). Stallion for getting cart or waggon horses, which has served mares in the local district during the season 187'i. — Prize, W. Chantler, Hurst Nook, Ashton. A medal was awarded to T. Statter for extra stock. Pair of horses, maies or geldings, the property of a tenant- farmer principally dependent on farming. — Prize, J. Hyde, Denton (only one entry). Cart horse, four years old and upwards, mare or gelding, the property of a tenant-farmer principally dependent on farming. — Prize, L. Hyde, Hartshead, Ashton-under-Lyne (only one entry). Cart horse, four years old or upwards, mare or gelding. — First prize, T. George ; second, T- A. Harrison, Stalybridge. Young horses, three years old gelding or filly — Prize, D. Adarason, Newton Heath, Hyde. Two years old gelding or filly. — Prize, J. Bardsley, Birdies Farm, Lees. One vear old colt or filly. — Prize, H. Smith, Bagshaw Farm, Glossop. Brood mare, for breeding horses suitable for farm work, with foal at foot. — First prize, J. Bardsley ; second, C. Stocks, Cheadle. Thoroughbred mare, with foal at foot. — First prize, S. Kirhy, 3, City-terrace, City-road, Manchester; second, L. Rawstorne, Hutton Hall, Preston. Halfbred mare, for road or field, with foal at foot. — First prize, S. Kirby ; second, J. F. Crowther, Knowl-grove, Mir- fii-ld. Highly commended : B. Bee, BuUsnape Hall. (Local prizes given by the Stalybridge local committee for residents within the local district.) LIGHT HORSES. Stallion, for getting weight-carrying hunters or roadsters, having served mares within the local district during the season 187-i. — Prize, W. Laycock, Crows-i'th-Wood, Staley, Staleybridge. Roadsters, four years old, mare or gelding, above 14 hands 2 inches. — First prize, W. Sidebottom, Etheron House, Hol- lingworth, Hadfield ; second, Lucy H. Sidebottom, Etheron House. Cobs, mare or gelding, above IS but under 14 hands 2 inches. — Prize, R. Heap, Brun Micklehurst, Mossley. Pony, mare or gelding, not over 13 hands. — Prize, T. Hall, Hollingworth. YOUNG HORSES FOR ROAD OR FIELD. Three-year-old-gelding or filly. — Prize, G. Kay, Sidebottom Fold, Stalybridge. Two-year-old colt or filly. — First prize, H. Smith, Bagshaw Farm, Glossop, Derbyshire ; second, R. Bridwake, Delph, Saddle wortli. One-year-old colt or filiy. — First prize, T. Ashton Harrison, Stalybridge; second, A. Holt, Liinehurst Farm, Ashton- under-Lyne. Brood mare, for road or field, with foal at foot. — First prize, M. H. H. Bardsley, Ashton-under-Tyne ; second, J. Bottomley, Hill Top, Stalybridge. SHEEP. (Open for competition to the United Kingdom.) SHROPSHIRE DOWNS. Shearling ram. — First prize, T. liigby, Darnhall Mill Farm ; second, W. Baker, Moor Barns, Atherstone ; third, T. Nock, Sutton House, Shifnal, Salop. Ram of any other age. — First prize, W. Baker ; second, W. F. Firmstone, Rockingham Hall, Hagley, Worcestershire : third, T. Rigby. 326 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE Ram lamb.— first prize, T. Nock ; second, W. Baker ; third, T. Nock. , ^ Three shearling ewes.— First prize, W. Baker; second, i. Nock ; third, W. F. Firmstone. Three ewes, having reared lambs this year. — First prize, W. Baker; second, W. F. Firmstone ; third, T. Nock. Three ewe lambs. — First prize, T. Nock ; second, W. Baker ; Third, T. Nock. LONG-WOOLLED OF ANT BREED. Shearling ram. — First, second, and third priies, T. II. Hutchinson, Manor House, Catterick. Ram of any other age. — First and second prizes, T. H. Hutchinson ; third, W. Norman, Hall Bank. Ram lamb. — First prize, W. Norman ; second, J.T. Clifton, Lytham Hall; third, T. H. Hutchinson. 'Three shearling ewes. — First and second prizes, T. H. Hutchinson. Three ewes having reared lambs tliis year. — First and second prizes, T. H. Hutchinson ; third, W. Norman. Three ewe lambs. — First prize, T. H.Hutchinson; second, J. T Clifton ; third, \Y. Norman. Three Cheviot ewes of any age. — First and second prizes, T. Roddick, Pembedw. Three half-bred Cheviot lambs, ewe or wether. — Prize, 11. Smith, Blackshaw Farm, Glossop, Derbyshire. Local Prizes. (For residents within the Stalybridge district.) White-faced horned ram of any age. — Prize, 11. Heap, Micklehurst, Mossley. Pen of not less than five white-faced ewes of same breed. — First prize, R. Heap; second, D. Heap, Micklehurst, Mossley. Pen of not less than five white-faced wethers of same breed. — First prize, D. Heap ; second, R. Heap. BlacK or speckled-faced horned ram. — Prize, R. Heap. Pen of not less than five ewes of same breed. — First prize, R. Heap ; second, W. Nield, HoUingworth Hall. Pen of not less than five wethers of same breed. — Prize, R. Heap. Pen of not less than five store sheep of any other variety. — Prize, W. Nield. PIGS. (Open for competition to the United Kingdom.) Boar of large white breed, above one year old. — First prize, J. and F. Howard, Britannia Farms, Bedford ; second and third, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds, Pyke House, Littleborough. Breeding sow of large white breed, above one year old. — First prize, C. R. N. Beswick-Royds ; second. Earl of EUes- mere; third, R. E.Duckering. Boar pigs of large white breed, under one year old. — First and second prizes, M. Walker, Stockley Park ; third, R. E. Dnckering. Pair of sow pigs, lar^je white breed, under one year old. — First prize, Earl of Ellesmere ; second, C. R. N. Beswicke- Royds ; third, P. Eden, Cross Lane, Salford. Boar of small white breed, above one year old. — First prize. Earl of Ellesmere ; second, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds ; third, R. E. Duckering. Breeding sow, white breed, above one year "Id. — First prize. Earl of Ellesmere; second, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds. Boar pig, white breed, above i/ne year old.— First prize, P. Eden ; second, M. Walker ; third, R. E. Duckering. Pair of sow pigs, white breed, above one year old. — First prize, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds ; second. Earl of Ellesmere. Breeding sow of the middle breed, above one year old. — Firat prize, Earl of Ellesmere; second, R. E. Duckering; third, C. R. N. Beswick-Royds. Boar pig of the middle breed, under one year old. — First prize, P. Eden; second, R. E. Duckering; third, H. Nield. Pair of sow pigs of the middle breed, under one year old. — First prize, P. Eden ; second, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds. Boar of the Berkshire breed, above one year old. — First prize, Mrs. CunlifTe, Darnhall Hall ; second and third, J. Wheeler, Long Compton. Breeding sow of the Berkshire breed, above one year old. — Fitjt prize, M. Walker ; second and third, J. Wheeler. Pair of sows of the Berkshire breed, under one year old. — First prize, Mrs. Cunliffe ; second, J. Wheeler. Boar, improved Essex, above one year old. — First prize, T. Rose, Meltham Magna, Norfolk ; second and third, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds. •* Breeding sow, improved Essex, one year old. — First prize, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds ; second, J. Wheleer ; third, R. E. Duckering. Pair of sows, improved Essex, under one year old. — First prize, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds ; second, T. Rose; third, C. R. N. Beswicke-Royds. Boar of any breed belonging to landlords in the district. — Prize, silver medal, W. J. Leigh, M.P., Lyme Park. LOCAL PRIZES. Boar of large breed. — First prize, H. Garside, Stalybridge; second, 11. Dyson, Stalybridge. Boar of small breed. — First prize, W. Winterbottom, Dukin- field ; second, R. Brierley, Stalywood. Sow of large breed. — First prize, R.Worthington, Moltram road ; second, E. Ford, Lunzley End. Sow of small breed. — Prize, R. Worthington. Litter of sucking pigs (with sow), under ten weeks old. — First prize, W. V/illiamson, Dukinfield ; second, 11. Worth- ington. Fat pig, any age. — Prize, J. Byrom, Commercial Inn, Staley. Pair of store pigs, under ten months old. — First prize, J. Turner, HoUingworth, Uadfield ; second, J. Bottoraley, Hill Top, Staley. GRAIN AND ROOTS. White wheat. — First prize, W. A. Gray, Dawpool, Birken- head ; second, J. Comes, New Farm, Hurleston. Yellow or red wheat. — First prize, T. Rigby, Darnhall Mill Farm, Winsford ; second, J. Comes. Any variety of white oats. — First prize, P. M'Gregor, Onston ; second, J. Greatorex, Stretton. Any variety of yellow oats. — Prize, H. Nield, The Grange, Worsiey. Black oats. — First prize, W. A. Gray, Dawpool ; second, H. Neild. Any variety of barley. — First prize, J. Greatorex ; second, W. K. Fowler, Prebendal Farm, Aylesbury. Any variety of beans. — i'irst prize, J. K. Fowler; second, W. A. Gray. Six roots Swedish turnips of any kind. — First prize, J. K. Fowler ; second, S. Taylor. Six roots of any other kind of turnips. — First prize, G. Smith, Flash Green Farm, Wheelton, near Chorley ; second, G. Ashbume, Low Hall, Broughton-m-Furness. Six roots of long red mangel wurtzel. — First prize, J. K, Fowler ; second, J. Greatorex. Six roots yellow mangel wurtzel — First prize, J. K. Fowler ; sscond, J. Greatorex. Six roots of any kind of globe manuel wurtzel. — First prize J. K. Fowler ; second, J. Greatorex. Six carrots, any variety. — G. Smith, Flash Green Farm ; second, II. Simcock, Brighton Grange. Two Scotch cabbages. — First prize, J. Greatorox ; second, II. Neild. Samples of twenty round potatoes. — First prize, J. Rigby, Spindle Hall Farm, Farringdon, Preston ; second, J. Taylor, Malpas, Cheshire. Samples of twenty flat potatoes. — First prize, G. Smith ; second, J. Taylor. Collections of farm and garden produce of any kind, the bona fide growth or manufacture of exhibitor. — First prize, T. F. Jackson, Tattenhall, Chester ; second, H. Simcock, Brighton Grange, Barton Moss ; third, F. Lythall, Offchurch, Lea- mington. CHEESE. Four cheeses, any colour, above 501b. each. — First prize, G. Prescott, Minshnll Vernon, Middlewich ; second, J. Robinson, Lee Green Hall, Middlewich; third, J. Cornes, New Farm, Hurleston. Four cheeses, under 501b. — First prize, W. Moieton, Acton Hill, Northwich ; second, .1. Beckett, Bechton Lawton, Che- shire ; third, R. Prescott, Iddinshall Hall. Three cheeses (for residents within the Stalybridge local district). — First prize, W. Nield, HoUingworth Hall, near Hadfield ; second, R. H. Ashton, Roe Cross, Mottram. BUTTER. Six half-pounds of fresh butter (for residents within the Stalybridge local district). — First prize, cup, J. Marson, Acton Trussell, Stafford ; second, H. Nield, The Grange, Worsiey ; third, S. W. Wildman, Park House, Shaw ; fourth, J. Lloyd, Rhuallt, St. Asaph, Flintshire. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 327 Six half-pounds of butter, made by exhibitors resident in the local district. — First prize, R. Jaffrey, Oak Farm, Stalybridge ; second, Mrs. M. Heginbotham, Shepley Farm, Hooley Hill ; third, A. Holt. Liraeliurst Farm, Ashton-under-Lyne ; fourth, W. Kirkham, Boar Fold, Stalybridge. IMPLEMENTS. Best arranged machiaery for preparing food for farm stock, to be exhibited in motion at work. — -First prize, S. Gorbett and Son, Park-street Works, Wellington, Salop ; second, Picksley, Sims, and Co., Bedford Foundry, Leigh ; medal, Richmond and Chandler, Salford ; medal, A. Woods and Cocksedge. Collection of farm implements and tools. — First prize, Rich- mond and Chandler • second. Standing, Preston. Articles of domestic use. — First prize, T. Bradford and Co., Cathedral Steps, Manchester ; second, R. Sykes, Stalybridge. Dairy vessels for butter and cheese-making. — First prize, G. Llewellin and Son, Haverfordwest, Pembrokeshire ; second, W. and F. Richmond, Colne, Lancashire. Useful articles in slate. — First prize. Belcher, Gee, and Co., Gloucester ; second, Lewis, Ford, and Co., Bristol Road, Gloucester. Best assortment of stable and cowhouse fittings. — Prize, Musgrave and Co., Belfast. Silver medals. — Richmond and Chandler, Salford, for a chaff-cutter; Harrison, M'Gregor, and Co., Leigh, for a two-horse Albion combined mower and reaper, and for a chafT-cutter ; 0 shorn e and Co., Liver pool, for a collection of agricultural implements by- American manufacturers ; J. Fowler and Co., Leeds, for six-horse traction engine; T. Standing, Preston, for Coultas' improved 6 ft. 6 in. 12-row corn and seed drill; David Harkes, Mere, Knutsford, for a drill plough ; Ran- somes, Sims, and Head for a six-horse power portable steam engine ; R. Horusby and Sons, Grantham, for a spring balance self raker ; Fallows and Bate, Manchester, for a lawn mower ; Picksley, Sims, and Co., for their general collection; Corbett and Peel, Shrewsbury, for a clover and seed barrow drill ; AV. Rainforth and Son, Lincoln, for their collection ; S . Corbett and Son, Wellington, for the best mode of fastening the mouldboard to a ridge plough ; J. Braggins, Banbury, for patent hangings for carriage gate ; W. Milburn, Manchester, for a combined vertical steam engine and boiler ; Wheeler and Wilson Company, Manchester, for a sewing machine, designed especially for heavy manufacturing purposes, tailoring, and leather work ; R. Jones, Liverpool, for a collection of sporting guns ; R. Sykes, Stalybridge, for kitchen-ranged grates ; G. Cheaven, Boston, for a collection of filters ; J. Crowley and Co., Sheffield, for an arm-stopping motion in a hay cutter ; J. Edwards, Manchester, for leather machine bands ; Dohson Brothers and Wormald, Leeds, for a double-reel sewing machine ; Hodgson and Stead, Salford, for a collection of weighing machines. HUNTINGDONSHIRE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT ST. NEOTS. The total number of enti-ies was 592, against .526 last year and 413 in 1872, showing an increase of over GO compared with 1873. The show of horses was good, especially the hunters. The total number of horses entered was 153, against 141 last year. Mr. J. Goodliff, of Huntingdon, was very successful as an exhibitor of horses ; for he was awarded as many as five cups, and Marshal McMahon took the Duke of Manchester's silver cup, while Lady Mary carried off both cups, the owner being both exhibitor and breeder. Mr. Hayward, of Southill, took the £25 cup with Richelieu, and the horses on the whole were the best exhibition ever seen at this show. The entry of horned stock was not quite so large as last year. The 20 gs. cup for the best bull was secured by Mr. W. Dolby, of Bingley, Yorkshire, against sixteen exhibitors, and the piece of plate for the best cow or heifer, value 20 gs., by Mr. Dolby also. The show of sheep was not so large as last year, the number of entries only 36. The £10 cup for the best pen of ewes was carried off by Mr. T. Gunnell, who also took the £5 cup for the best pen of lambs. There was a fair show of pigs, and the root show was quite up to the average. There was a small show of implements ; and the ploughing matches were again dis- pensed with. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES. — Cart-horses : J. Coates Sharpley, Kerstern Hall, Louth; J. Plowright, Manea, Isle of Ely. RiDiNK Horses : J. Martin, W'ainfleet ; J. Plowright, Manea; J. Bennett, Husbands Bosworth. Breeding and Store Stock : F. Dunn, Weston, Shipton-on-Stour ; E. A. Fawcett, Ciiildwick Hall, St. Alban's. Sheep and Pigs : T. Cartwright, Dunstaa Pillar, Lincoln ; H. Overman, Weasenham, Norfolk. HORSES. Cart stallions (open to all England). — First prize, £15, R. Hopper, Whittlesey ; second, £7, J. Smalley, Whittlesey. Cart mares suckling foals (open to all England). — First prize, cup, value £10, J. Warlli, jun., Chatteris; second, £3, R. H. Ekins, Wennington. Two-year-old cart geldings. — First prije, £6, S. Fyson, Warboys ; second, £3, S. Fyson. Two-year-old cart fillies. — First prize, £6, W. Nix, jun., Soraersliam ; second, £3, T. H. Vergeste, Boro' Fen. Cart foals. — First prize, £2, R. H. Ekins ; second, £1, J. Hall, Little Barford, St. Neots. Pair of cart-horses. — Prize, cup, value 5 gs., IMr. Fyson. Hunting mares or geldings, above three or under four years old. — Prize, cup, value 10 gs., as breeder, and a cup, value 5 gs., as owner, J. Goodliff, Huntingdon. Hunting mares or geldings, above four and under five years old (open to all England). — Prize, cup, value £25, Mr. Hay- ward, Southill, Biggleswade. Hunting mares or geldings, five years old or upwards (open). — Prize, cup, value 20 gs., J. Goodliff. Mares and foals for hunting purposes, the foals by thorough- bred stallions. — First prize, cup, value £10, J. Goodliff ; second, cup, value £5, J. Goodliff. Roadster mares or geldings, above four and under five years old, and not exceeding 15 bauds 1 inch (open). — Prize, cup, value £10, Mr. Tebbutt, Bluntisham, St. Ives. Roadster mares or geldings, above five years old, over 14 hands and not exceeding 15 hands 3 inches (open). — First prize, cup, value £5, T. Banyard, Horning.sea, Cambs ; second, £3, S. Day, St. Neots. Hackney mares, not exceeding 15 hands 1 inch. — Prize, £5, J. Topiiara, Great Staughton. Hackney cobs, not exceeding 14 hands. — Prize, cup, value 5 gs., W. R. Cockle, Hill-row, Haddenhara, Ely. Ponies, not exceeding 13 hands. — Prize, 3 gs., J. Goodliff. Mares or geldings, not less than 14 hands, with action and pace in harness. — Prize, cup, value 5 gs., J. Benton, Somer- sham. Mares or geldings, for jumping. — Prize, cup, value £5, W. and A. T. Wagstaff, Offord, Cluney. CATTLE. Bulls not under two years old. — First prize, £8, Mr. Wood, Clapton, Thrapston; second, £4, T. Smith, Tilbrook. Bulls under two years old. — First prize, £6, J. J. Sharp, Broughton, Kettering; second, £3, B. Brown, Huntingdon. Cows of any age, in milk or in calf. — First prize, £5, J.J. Sharp ; second, £3, S. Armstrong, Shingay, Royston. Cows of any age adapted for dairy purposes, and not eligible to be entered in the Herd-book. — First prize, silver inkstand value 10 gs., G. E, Daintree, Fenton ; second, £3, ^^Ir. Looker, Wyton Manor. 328 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. Heifers under three and over two years old.— First prize, £4, Mr. Looker. Heifers under two years old, and not eligible to be entered in the Herd-book.— First prize, £3. B. Brown ; second, £1 10s., C. Daintree. ! Heifers under two years old. — First prize, £3, J. J. Sharp ; second, £1 10s., C. Daintree. Steers under three and over two years old. — First prize, £5, Mr. Sisman, Buckworth Lodge, Hunts. Steers under two years old. — First prize, £3, C. Daintree ; second, £1 10s., Mr. Sisraan. Pair of steers of any ajre or breed, not being Shorthorns. — First prize, £4, C. Hall, Eaton Socon; second, £2, IMr. Sisman. Bulls (open to all England). — Prize, cup, value 20 gs., W. Dolby, Bingley, Tiorkshire. Cows or heifers (open). — Prize, piece of plate, value 20 gs., W. Dolby. SHEEP. LOUG-WOOLS. Three sbearling wethers. — First prize, £4', T. Gunnell, Milton, Cambs; second, £2, J. Looker, Hemingford Abbotts. Five ewes that have suckled lambs to the 1st of June last. — First prize, £4-, T. Gannell ; second, £2, J. T. Roseblade, Hil- ton, Hunts. Five wether lambs. — First prize, £4, T. Gunnell; second, 0. Daintree. Five ewe lambs. — First prize, £4, T. Gunnell ; second, £2, J. T. Roseblade. Five tup lambs. — First prize, £4-, T. Gunnell ; second, £2, Mr. Looker, Wyton Manor. SHORT-AVOOL OR MIXED BREED. Three shearling wethers. — Prize, £4, W. Wells, Holme Wood House, Hunts. Five ewes that have suckled lambs to the 1st of June. — First prize, £4, Mr. Street, Harrowden House, near Bedford ; second, £2, J. Hall, Little Barford, St. Neols. Five wether lambs. — First prize, £4, W. Welh; second, £2. J. Hall. Five ewe lambs. — Prize, £4, F. Street. Best pen of ewes exhibited in the foregoing classes. — Prize, cup, value £10, T. Gunnell. Best pen of lambs exhibited. — Prize, cup, value £5, T. Gunnell. Best ram (open to all England). — Prize, cup, value £10, W. F. Marshall, Branston, Lincoln. PIGS. Boars, large breed.— First prize, £3, Hon. C. W. W. Fitz- wiUiam, M.P. AUwaton, Peterboro' ; second, £1 10s., Duke of Manchester, Kimbolton Castle. Boars, small breed. — First prize, £3, Enrl of Carysfort, Elton Hall ; second, £1 10s., Mr. Deacon, Polebrook Hall. Breeding or suckling sows, large breed. — First prize, £3, J. Looker; second, £1 10s., Mr. Deacon. Breeding or suckling sows, small breed. — First prize, £3, Mr. Deacon; second, £1 10s., Earl of Carysfort. Three yelts over six and under twelve months old. — First prize, £3, J. Looker ; second, £1 10s., J. Looker. Best animal exhibited in the pig classes. — Prize, cup, value £5, J. Looker. At the dinner, Mr. E. Fellowes, M.P., the Chairman, wished to congratulate his agricultural friends upon the har- vest they had seen that day. They had had a most satisfactory harvest, and, thanks to God, they had had magnificent weather to gather in their crops, so that they had reason to be thank- ful. But he thought he heard them reminding him of the low price of wheat. Well, the price bad undoubtedly gone down, but they would hope that the fall was not a permanent one, but that wheat would be at such a price as to be remunerative to the farmer and advantageous to the consumer. He thought and hoped he might also congratulate them upon the termina- tion of those disagreeable feelings which had existed for some little time between the employers and their labourers. He was in great hopes that that was now terminated. He hoped -that the labourers had found now who were their best friends. He trusted that they had found that Mr. Arch and those people who went about the country setting class against class were not the real friends of the agricultural labourer. He thought the labourers had learnt that, although not without great loss. Their present experience had cost a good many of them a great deal. Many hundreds and thousands had been out of work a considerable time, and had gained nothing by it. He hoped he might say it was at an end. It was past, but perliaps there might be a little advantage in what had taken place to them all. The labourers deserved consideration, and whenever opportu- nity arose it should be shown to them. They must endeavour to show the labourers that they were their real true friends. They should endeavour to the utmost of their power, to advance the happiness, welfare, and prosperity of the labourer. He was far from saying that such was not the case. Those who re- collected what the agricultural labourers were a few years ago, and recoUectinz the state they were then in, must observe the great improvement that has taken place in their condition in the last few years. The labourers might be told that the farmers were their enemies, but they would know that such was not the case. The recent circumstances through which they had passed ought to teach them to do what they could to promote the welfare of the labourer. There was a suggestion that would be sure to engage the attention of Parliament next session, and which was of considerable importance. If he were not convinced that it would be taken up by Parliament, he would have brought the matter before the attention of his brother landowners. He referred to the establishment of country friendly societies. That was a matter that he believed was of importance for the consideration of them all. He knew where they had been established, they had been attended with the most beneficial results. They were aware that there were various clubs existing, but he was afraid it was not always the case that these clubs were on a sound footing, and they had heard of such thing as these clubs becoming insolvent. A young man entered one of these clubs early in life, contributed to its funds nearly all his life, and towards the close, when he hoped to de- rive some benefit from it, he found it was insolvent. This was a very great hardship. If friendly societies were established on a proper footing, and were governed by good rules, and based on proper tables, there would be no fear of such clubs becoming insolvent, but would be a great benefit to the la- bouring classes, If it was taken up as a county matter he believed the labourers would largely support it. If they had a large area over which the society would spread it would be successful and would confer great benefit. What they wanted to do was to instil into the minds of the labourers a spirit of frugality and independence. At the present time, if one of these men became sick or old, he had to go to the Uuion and be supported at the expense of the rates. What they wanted to do was to make a man provident, to make him leel that when he is ill or old, he can go on the funds of his club as a right. The great advantage of the clubs was that they in- duced men to lay by a small allowance every week or month towards sickness and old age. He believed that if the matter was taken up by landowners generally and a good fund pro- vided to fall back upon, there would be no want of confidence on the part of the l^bourers, but that they would much more readily become members than they did of the present societies. About two years ago the Speaker had called upon his labourers to invest their money in his farm, and he promised they should have part of the profits. It sounded all very well in theory, but he believed at the time and still believed that it was im- practicable. He wished to pay great deference to the opinion of the right hon. gentleman, but he thought he had made a very great error, and had proved that himself, as he had said tliat he was very sorry to say he had not received one single application from any of his labourers. At the same time, Mr. Brand still held out the offer that he would receive the money in the concern and share the profits with them proportionately. How those profits were to be arrived at he did not know. At all events to that day no single application had been made, nor did he believe it would, or if it were that it would be beneficial to either the employer or the labourer. On the contrary, he thought it would throw down the apple of discord, and would do a great deal of harm. What they wanted was to promote harmony and good will, and instead of that it would produce just the reverse, and the sooupr his right hon. friend dropped the whole question the better, THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. !-20 STOCK SALES. V SALE OF THE DUKE OF DEVOXSHIRE'S SHORTHORNS. At Holker, on Wednesday, September Oth. By MR. H. STRAPFORD. On the 9th of September, 1864, Mr. Strafford sold by auotion at Holker a selection of nineteen cows and heifers and eleven bulls at an average of £60 3s., making a total sum of £1,984 lOs. The highest-priced female was a red three-year-old Barrington heifer, Countess of Barrington 2nd, which Wr. Sheldon, of Brailes, bought for 135 gs. The highest-priced bull was Twelfth Duke of Oxford (19633), which Messrs. Adcock and Longland bought for ?A0 gs. Three Oxford bulls were sold at the same time for :> total of 415 gs., but no Oxford females were offered. Ten yea.- later, on the 9th of September, 1874, twenty- eight cows and heifers were sold at an average of £462 8s., and fifteen bulls at £236 13s. 6d., or a total of £16,497 12s. Are any further facts necessary to indicate the extraordinary rise in the value of high-bred stock ? The Duke's herd is an old-established one, and its position in the Shorthorn world ten years ago was equal to what it is now. As far back as 1851 a portion of it wa.s sold. The late Mr. John CoUing's Rosey, one of the grandest cows of her day, went to Holker about *46, but the cow which elevatad the herd was Oxford 15th. She was bought at Lord Ducie's sale at Tortworth, 1853, for 210 gs., and a large family has been reared at Holker from her and her offspring. Indeed, it has been the custom, until a few years back, to look to Wetherby for the Duchess blood and to Holker for the Oxford. Comparing, as far as one is capable of doing — for we are prone to think things better than they were by lapse of time — the cattle ten years ago were neater, deeper, rounder, and broader in their carcases, and with sweeter heads and horns, than those shown last Wednesday. The frame appeared to be lengthened, and with it came a looseness of structure ; many of the cows were forward in their shoulders, and very patchy, particularly in their hind-quarters ; the head seemed larger and "the horns darker coloured, longer, and outspreading. Two of the lots. Music and Minstrel, were of the old type, the latter being generally acknowledged the handsomest animal in the sale. The heifers, particularly the yearlings and some of the calves, were excellent, and fit to exhibit -^ they were mostly dark colours, reds or roans, and in excellent con- dition. Some of the calves were thin, especially two or three of the younger bulls. The hotels in the surrounding district were full, and before the Askholme special train arrived there was a goodly company. The sale lots, except the calves and bulls, were grazing in the sale field, and about eleven the bulls were paraded. Three of the Barrington tribe were white, and much admired ; level, thick, massive bulls they were, particularly the youngest. Baron Barrington 6th. Baron "Winsome 3rd, a thick good roan, ex- cellent in his fore-hand, was another favourite. It was rumoured that this bull was resold at a profit the follow- ing day to Lord Sudeley. Neither Baron Oxford 5th nor Duke of Nancy met with great public fancy, indeed the low price the Duke realised can hardly be taken as a test of his merit. Mr. Drewry had thought well enough of him to mate "Winsome 12th with him, but the produce, a May bull-calf, only went for 48 gs.,against 360 gs. for the dam. Luncheon, although announced for one o'clock, com- menced soon after twelve ; it was laid for some hundreds in the schoolrooms, and a great squeeze took place to get in. The Duke presided, and after the loyal toast. Lord Dunmore, as before, gave the Duke's health, which was very heartily received. Mr. Strafford's was also eiveu, and it is but simple justice to say that the sale was as expeditiously as it was excellently conducted. The company was much divided, and taking a careful survey of the numbers, five deep round the ring, in the rostrums, and in the conveyances, it was esti- mated that eight or nine hundred persons were assembled. Mr. Drewry supported Mr. Strafford, and with him wen; Mr. Leney, Mr. Fox, Mr. Longman, Mr. Barnes, and several others. The Duke and a large party of ladies were in a dray, with Sir John Whit worth on the box. Below, in Lord Bective's pony carriage, which had been specially sent over, was Capt. Oliver, and around him Mr. Holford, Mr. Sartoris, Mr. Sheldon, Mr. Beauford, Col. Kingscote, and many others. Lords Bective, Dunmore, Fevershani, and Cavendish, occupied another drag, and in the opposite rostnun to the auctioneer's. Lord Cheshara, Rev. P. Graham, Rev. Mr. Bradshaw, as well as others from Ireland, Mr. Coleman, and appropriately Mr. Thornton, and many others stood. The Bowuess'bus contained the Storrs party, among whom were Mr. Booth, Mr. Pole Gell, Mr. Aylraer, and Mr. Jacob W^ilsou. Mr. Angerstein, Mr.Wilson, of Shotley, and Mr. Mitchell, of Scotland, were also here ; while the Cumberland fasliiou of sitting inside the ring was naturally enough adopted by Sir Wilfrid Law- son, Mr. George Moore, and Mr. J. P. Foster; as also by Mr. Gow, Mr. Loder, Mr. Robinson, Mr. Ashburner, Mr. Crowdson, and other local breeders. "When the animals came into the ring the Oxford cows were certainly most in demand, and realised the highest prices. The sale opened with Grand Duchess of Oxford 6th, a red ten years old, rather patchy from years, but very massive, and half gone in calf. Having produced six heifers she might naturally be expected to coutiuue this profitable career, and ]\Ir. Frank Allen, of Thurmaston, got her at 805 gs. It was a great opening and indicated a high average. Mr. Sheldon gave 300 gs. for lot 2, another Barrington, nearly own sister to that which he bought ten years ago. Winsome 4th being amiss, was withdrawn, and her hand- some yearling heifer substituted, when she went to Mr. Wilson, of Shotley, one of Mr. Bates' oldest friends, and who has had a herd of Shorthorns in Northumberland for nearly half a century. Then came the two crack lots of the sale, Grand Duchesses of Oxford 11th and 12th; the former, the dam of Lord Bective's 1,005 gs. heifer at the 1871 sale (although her dam was by the late Dr. Dickin- son's Priam of the Cressida blood), was one of the evenest and best Oxfords, and, after a 500 gs. start and brief com- petition, she soon realised a thousand, from Mr. George Moore. The other. Grand Duchess of Oxford 12th, had bred the two bulls of which IMr. Drewry had made a thousand guineas each ; and it would seem a young cow, six and a-half years old, was worth more tiian the 1,010 gs. Mr. Brogden paid for her. In appearance, however, she differed much from the rest, being small and rather light-fleshed ; still she looked like a bull breeder. As times go, Mr. Ashburner got a bargain in the two white Oxford heifers at 760 gs. and 675 gs. each. Baroness Oxford 3rd was the " gem" of the young lots ; and the public were justified in putting her as 330 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. the higlieot-piiced auimal. She was calved in Novem- ber last — a handsome hairy red, and a grand-daughter of Lady Oxford olh, one of the best Holker cows. Started at 500 gs., there was sharp bidding from various quarters till 1,000 guineas was reached, and Mr. Holford outbid Northumberland at 1,100 gs., getting her at least 100, or some said 400 gs., below the public estimate of her value. Still it was an excellent price for a calf, and a great improvement on her grand-dam's price, COO gs., in 1867. Of the Winsoraes much might be written : they are large-framed good cattle, and rose considerably in value on former sales. Mr. Geo. Fox gave 700 gs. for a lovely heifer, Winsome 16th, fit to go into a Royal show. Sir Wilfrid Lawson gave 605 gs. for another heifer, Winsome 14th, and the twelve of the tribe sold averaged £333. Many breeders have not hesitated to say that the Oxford Roses, or Rose of Raby tribe has produced some of the finest animals at Holker. Mr. Drewry has care- fully guarded the tribe and kept them together from Sir Joseph Whitworth's sale. Mr. Longman effected a good stroke of policy in buying the entire tribe, saving a rather weedy one, which went to Wetherby, at an aver- age of £237. Towards the close of the sale of the cows and heifers the biddings certainly became flat ; and more so at the finish, when several of the bull-calves went cheap. Whether the public, excited with the high prices made by the first few lots, suddenly became enervated and apathetic, or whether anticipating something better the next day at Underley, it is difficult to tell ; nevertheless, the sale was dull, great as the averages afterwards proved. Forty-three head averaged £383 13s. 3d., against forty-three at £240 13s. lOd. in 1871, and with this enormous increase in the space of three years, there was a corresponding increase in the value of the tribe. Breeders did not, however, hesitate to express opinions that the Oxfords and Barringtons had somewhat declined in value and the Winsome had risen, notwithstanding any increase in value. Certainly the voice of the people was in favour of the Winsome tribe, and the wonderful result of the sale is strong evidence of the high position still maintained by the Holker herd. COWS AND HEIFERS. Grand Duchess of Oxford 6th, red, calved April 18th, 1864 ; by Imperial Oxford (18084), out of Grand Duchess of Oxford 4th. — Mr. Allen, Leicestershire, 805 gs. Countess of Barriugton 4th, roan, calved May 23rd, 1864 ; by Lord Oxford (20214), out of Countess of Barrington.— Mr. Shildon, Warwickshire, 800 gs. Music, roan, calvedlOctober 14th, 1866 ; by Juryman (20043), out of Minstrel 3rd.— Mr. Postlethwaite, Whitehaven, 200 gs. Winsome 4th, red, calved Dec. 2, 1866 ; by Grand Duke 10th (21848), out of Wmsome.— Mr. T. Wilson, Shotley, 310 gs. Grand Duchess of Oxford 11th, red, calved July 6th, 1867 ; by Grand Duke 10th (21848), out of Grand Duchess of Oxford 6th.— Mr. Geo. Moore, Whitehall, near Wigton, Cumberland, 1,000 gs. Grand Duchess of Oxford 12th, rich roan, calved Feb. 28th, 1868 ; by 2nd Duke of Wetherby (21618), out of Grand Duchess of Oxford 7tb.— Mr. Brogden, M.P., 1,090 gs. Bright Eyes 5th, roan, calved May 4th, 1868 ; by Grand Duke 6th (19876), out of Bonny.— Lord Skelmersdale, 800 gs. Winsome 5th, red and white, calved Oct. 19th, 1868 ; by Grand Duke 10th (21848), out of Winsome 2nd.— Lord Feversham, 850 gs. Musical, roan, calved June 24tli, 1869 ; by Grenadier (21876), out of Minstrel 3rd.— Sir Wilfrid Lawson, 360 gs. Oxford Rose 3rd, roan, calved June 24th, 1869 ; by Baron Oxford 3rd ,(25679), out of Rose of Raby.— Mr. Longman, Herts, 250 gs^ Lady Blanche 3rd, roan, calved Feb. 23rd, 1870 ; by Genera 1 Napier (24023), out of Lady Blanche. — Sir W. Lawson, 380 gs. Severn Girl, red, calved March 6, 1871 ; by 3rd Duke of Clarence (23727), out of Severn Lady. — Mr. Postlethwaite, 130 gs. Winsome 12th, roan, calved April 20, 1871 ; by Baron Oxford 4th (25580), out of Winsome 2nd.— Mr. Ilalford, Market Harbro', 360 gs. Countess of Barrington 6th, roan, calved Nov. 24, 1871; by Baron Oxford 4tb (25580).— Mr. Levy, 860 gs. Carry 2nd, roan, calved Sept. 4, 1871 ; by Baron Oxford 4th (25580), out of Caroline.— Sir J. Whitworth, 205 gs. Oxford Rose 7th, roan, calved Feb. 13, 1872 ; by Baron Oxford 4th (25580), out of Oxford Rose 2nd.— Mr. Long- man, 305 gs. Winsome 14th, roan, calved April 2, 1872 ; by Baron Oxford 4th (25580), out of Winsome 4th.— Sir W. Lawson, 605 gs. Harmony, red and white, calved Oct. 9, 1872 ; by Prince of Lightburne (29653), out of Music— Mr. Foster, Kilhow, 200 gs. Grand Duchess of Oxford 25th, white, calved Nov. 30, 1872 ; by Baron Oxford 4th (25580), out of Grand Duchess of Oxford 15th. — Mr. Ashburner, CJlverstone, 160 gs. Maid of Lome 2nd, red, calved April 16th, 1873 ; by Baron Wellington (30495), out of Maid of Lome.— Col. Gunter, Wetherby, 150 gs. Winsome 16th, roan, calved Aug. lOtli, 1873 ; by Baron Oxford 4th (25580), out of Bright Eyes 5th.— Mr. G. Fox, Hertfield, 700 gs. Melaby, white, calved September 4th, 1873 ; by Baron Oxford 4th (25570), out of Music— Mr. G. Fox, 310 gs. Blanche 13th, red and white, calved October 16th, 1873 ; by Duke of Oxford 24th (31002), out of Lady Blanche 3rd. —Sir J. Whitworth, 205 gs. Winsome 17th, roan, calved Oct. 24th, 1873 ; by Duke of Oxford 24th (31002), out of Lady Bright Eyes 3rd.— Lord Skelmersdale, 310 gs. Oxford Rose 9th, roan, calved Oct. 30th, 1873 ; by Duke of Oxford 24th (31002), out of Oxford Rose 5th.~Mr. Long- man, 230 gs. Baroness Oxford 3rd, red, calved Nov. 12th, 1873 ; by Duke of Hillhurst (28401), out of Baroness Oxford.— Mr. Hol- ford, 1,100 gs. Grand Duchess of Oxford 28th, white, calved Nov. 17th, 1873 ; by Duke of Oxford 24th (31002), out of Grand Duchess of Oxford 15th. — Mr. Ashburner, 675 gs. Severn Maid, red, calved Feb. 8th, 1874; by Cleveland, out of Severn Girl. — Mr. Markworth, of New Zealand, 675 gs. Clarissa (the property of Mr. Dewry), red and white, calved Feb. 20th, 1866 ; by Oxford (20150), out of Clarence.— Mr. Loder, 110 gs. BULLS. Baron Oxford 5th (27958), red, calved Feb. 7th, 1870 ; by 2nd Duke of Claro (21576), out of Lady Oxford 7th.— The Duke of Roxburgh, 250 gs. Duke of Nancy (30991), red, calved Feb. 17th, 1872 ; by Cherry Duke (25752), out of Dorothy.— Mr, Dalzell, Cumberland, 46 gs. Baron Winsome 3rd, roan, calved Dec. 4th, 1872 ; by Baron Oxford 4th (25580), out of Winsome.— Mr. Coleman, Stoke Park, 250 gs. Baron Barrington 4th, white, calved Feb. 10th, 1873 ; by Baron Oxford 4th (25580), out of Countess of Barrington 4th.— Mr. W. H. Wakefield, Kendal, 210 gs. Baron Barrington 5th, white, calved April 10th, 1873 ; by Baron Oxford 4th (25580), out of Countess of Barrington 5th. — Tjord Skelmersdale, 300 gs. Duke of Oxford 26th, roan, calved June 10th, 1873 ; by Baron Oxford 4th (25580), out of Grand Duchess of Oxford 19th. — Mr. Robinson, Beckhampstead, 420 gs. Baron Tregunter, red, calved Sept. 30th, 1873 ; by 3rd Duke of Tregunter (31026), out of Evening Star.— Mr. Postle- thwaite, 250 gs. Baron Barrington 6th, white, calved Nov. 23rd, 1873 ; by Baron Oxford 4th (25580), out of Lady Ellen Barrington. — Mr. Howard, Winterfold, Worcestershire, 185 gs. Duke of Oxford 28th, roan, calved December 24th, 1873 ; by the Duke of Oxford 24th (31002), out of Grand Duchess of Oxford 17th.— Lord Chesham, 560 gs. THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 331 Duke of Oxford 29th, roan, calved January 12tli, 1874 ; by Baron Oxford 4th (35580), out of Grand Duchess of Oxford 12th.— Sir J. Whitworth, 400 gs. Duke of Oxford 30th, red, calved February 1st, 1874; by Fifth Duke of Wetherby (31033), out of Grand Duchess of Oxfora 21st. — Mr. Morris, Liverpool, 275 gs. Baron Barriugton 7th, white, calved April 22nd, 1874 ; by 3rd Duke of Clarence (23727), out of Countess of I5ar- rington 5th — Mr. Martin, Cornwall, 71 gs. Baroa Wiusorae 5tli, roan, calved May 13th, 1874 ; by Duke of Nancy (30991), out of Winsome 12th.— Mr. Fawkes, Fariiley Hall, 71 gs. Baron Winsome 6th, roan, calved May 20th, 1874 ; by Baron Oxford 4th (25580), out of Winsome 5th,— Mr. Crowd- son, Ulverston, 50 gs. SALE OF LORD BECTIVE'S SHORTHORNS. AT UNDERLEY, KIRKBY LONSDALE. ON SEPTEMBER 10. BY MR. JOHN THORNTON. " His Lordship has been a liberal and judicious buyer." — Thus was the sale introduced to a company far larger than that assembled at Holker. The morning was cloudy and often wet, as during the sale great gusts of wind accompanied with hail and drenching showers occasionally interrupted the business — a very dififerent day to the one preceding. The catalogue of the TJnderley herd was accompanied by a map coloured with the diiferent lines of railways and towns iu the district. This made clear what otherwise would have been an obscure district to find, though the finding of it would repay the seach when the beauties of the place were seen. A special train, happily arranged from Lancaster, picked up scores of passengers at Carnforth, Oxenholrae and Low Gill ; and although several convey- ances were provided at Barbon, the nearest station to TJnderley, yet many had to walk, the numbers being so great. The history of the stock was given in the preface to the catalogue, which stated that the herd was commenced in 1868, with purchases from the herd belonging to Mr. Foster, of Killhow. It was next increased by animals bought from Lord Penrhyn, Col. Kingscote ; Mr. Rich, of Didmarton ; Mr. Mcintosh, of Havering Park ; and Mr. Saunders, of Nunwick Hall. Subsequently several first- class animals were added from the Holker, Dun7nore, and Gaddesby herds, and more recently the famous cow Tenth Duchess of Geneva, her heifer-calf, and the Ninth Duchess of Oneida, were purchased at the well-known sale at New York Mills, U.S.A. Baron Oxford 3rd (35579), bred at Holker, a son of that magnificent cow Lady Oxford 5th, was first used. He was succeeded by Grand Duke of Kent 2nd (28759), by Lord Oxford 2nd from Grand Duchess 9th, who is the sire of seventeen of the younger animals in the catalogue ; while latterly Second Duke of Tregunter (26022), a son of Fourth Duke of Thorndale and Duchess 94th, for three seasons at Siddington, and third Duke of Glo'ster from Gaddesby, also of the Duchess tribe, have been, and are still, in service. The animals whose pedigrees are herein given comprise the entire herd, with the exception of the Duchesses from America, a few favourite old cows, and Grand Duchess of Oxford 18th and Cherry Princess, whose daughters were both included in the sale. Eight lots are of the Kirklevington tribe, and eleven of the Gwyune or Princess family. Five are descended from the handsome Winsomes, of tiie Wild Eyes tribe, obtained from Holker ; three are of the Bar- riugton tribe, and seven of the popular Darlington family. Among the remainder are specimens of the Towndey Blanche, the Chaffs from Kingscote, the Craggs, and Violet tribes, while the old-established herds of Mr. A. L. Maynard and Messrs. Crofton are represented by the Flora and Garland strains. The principal sires are bulls of the fashionsble Duchess blood, more than two-thirds of the animals being by the well-known sires Seventh Duke of York (17754), Duke of Wetherby (17753), Third Duke of Wharfdale (21619), Third Duke of Clarence (23727), Fourth Duke of Thorndale (17750), Second Duke of Collingham (237304), Grand Duke 17th (24064), Grand Duke of Kent 2nd (28759), and Second Duke of Tregunter (26022). Three sons of the Duke of Devonshire's Lady Oxford 5th — Baron Oxford 3rd, 4th and 5th— are likewise among the sires, and it will be seen that the cows and heifers are nearly all in-calf either to Second Dnke ot Tre- gunter (26022), or Third Duke of Glo'stsr (lot 43), the latter with Grand Duke of Kent 2nd (28759) being in- cluded in the sale. As the cattle roamed in the park, it soon became mani- fest that the cows and heifers were quite equal to those offered at Holker. They were not so patchy, and al- though loosely made and large-framed — as their blood would naturally lead one to expect — they were perhaps altogether a better lot of cows, though not a more bloom- ing lot of heifers. The bulls were by some considered not equal to those at Holker, by others superior. Be that as it may, the spirited sale, and capital prices got for them, were inferences greatly in their favour. The most conspicuous lots to attract the eye were 1, 3, 8, 10, 13, 15, 16, 18, 24, 25, 27, 29, 83, 34, 35, 36, 39, Perhaps for choice, old Duchess Gwynne, Siddingtons 4th and 7th, and the Darlingtons ; among the heifers, Winsomedale, Cherry Queen and Empress of Oxford. Fair Maid of Kent and Princess Sale were beautiful little calves. The reserved cows were viewed during the morning, and the company drawn together at lunch-time, by the parade of Tenth Duchess of Geneva, her yearUing heifer, and her red bull-calf. The other American importation had injured a hind leg in the iron railings, and was unable to be led out. The cow is a magnificent animal, nicely pro- portioned, a lightish roan, with a grand back and ribs, good shoulders, somewhat hollow hind-quarters, but with a lovely head and beautiful pair of horns nicely set on. The heifer, although thick, handsome, and a beautiful roan, is not so highly finished as her dam, whose excellence is imparted to her son — a red calf, full of hair and mas- culine character, with great style and length of body, without being disjointed. Mr. Leney's Sixth Duke of Oneida is out of the same dam, and her last calf promises to make equally as good a bull. The possession of these three Shorthorns is sufficient of itself to make a herd of great reputation ; and the brilliant sale which followed undoubtedly stamps the TJnderley herd as one of the best Bates herds in the kingdom, if not the topmost one. Luncheon was provided in a large marquee for 600, and not being ready by noon threw the sale a little late. Lord Bective presided, and Mr. Booth, of Warlaby, pro- posed his health. Mr, Sheldon, of Geneva, U.S.A., being present, his health was also given, and happily responded to, and by a quarter to two the company had gathered round the ring. The biddings throughout were quick, general, and lively. Duchess Gwynne, rising 12 years old and down calving, created great excitement when she ran up to 430 gs. (Mr. Salt), and the spirit of the sale was of the same character. Mr. Coleman, who bid well at Holker, made several judicious purchases of cows, and took as a mate for them the Third Duke of Glo'ster, which Lord Bective bought at Gaddesby last year, Mr. Cheney's agent being against Mr. Coleman on this occasion. Mr. Wilson, of Shotley, purchased Violante's Butterfly, bred at Towneley, of the Blanche tribe, as well as one of the best Winsomes. Lord Ellesmere secured some of the Siddingtons. The Darlingtons, the tribe most fancied by the public — large, Y 2 332 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. massive animals as they are — were all purchased by Mr. Jjoder; and Col. Loyd-Liadsay took the Chaff faoiily. Lord Fitzhardinge bid very firmly both for Siddingtou 7th — now swollen into a lias cow — and Winsomedale, securing both of them. Mr. Brogden, having the Princess tribe, still kept to it. Great excitement took place when Cherry Queen entered ; as she had been exhibited and admired, though not placed at Hull. From 500 gs. to TOO gs., and on to a thousand, were rapid bids, Mr. Larking and i\lr. Ilolford concluding the joust, and Sussex won at 1,220 gs. A handsome Winsome calf accomjDanies her. The calves came galloping into the ringj; they made excellent prices, as also the bulls. Grand Duke of Kent 2ad, returned from hire, looked thin ; but the liandsome calves he had left on the herd added much to his fame. Mr. De Vitre takes him at 750 gs. into Berkshire, where he has a fine herd of Bates and Towneley cattle. This bull, bred by jNIr. Leney, was sold to Mr. Slye, from whom Lord Bective purchased him for 1,000 gs. Lord Lunesdale Bates was a promising young bull, and Mr.Casswell bid strongly and last for him against Mr. Longman, and he goes into Lincolnshire. Major Webb bought INIarquis, a very handsome calf, at 330 gs., and Ostrogoth, a young bull bred from Turks Darling a reserved cow, of the old Sarsden blood, made the same figure, ]\Ir. Percival Maxwell competing for both of them. A few bulls, the property of Mr. Fawcett, of Scaleby, and his tenants, were afterwards sold at lower figures. Considering the number sold, 55 head, 15 of which were bulls, the average of £363 is nearly twice asmuchas was generally anticipated, and the sum realised is the largest yet made by any herd of Shorthorns in England. Subjoined are prices and buyers. COWS AND HEIFERS. Duclipss Gwynne, roan, calved December 15, 1862 ; bv Duke of Wetherby(17753),out of PollyGwynne.— Mr. Salt, Leices- ter, 430 guineas. Violante's Butterflv, red and white, calved November 17, 1862- by Royal Butterfly (16862), out of Violante.— Mr. T. Wilson, Shotley Hall, 22U gs. Kirklevington 16th, roan, calved January 6, 1865; bv Duke of Wetherby (17753), out of Kirklevington 12th.— Sir John Swinburne, 420 gs. Flora M'lvor, red, calved January 6, 1864; by Third Duke of Lancaster (19624), out of Fata Morgana.— Mr. E. J. Cole- man, Stoke Park, 150 gs. Winsome 2nd, red and white, calved March 12, 1865; by Lord Oxford (20214), out of Winsome.— Mr. E. J. Coleman, 305 gs. Lady Oxford, roan, calved September 12, 18G5 ; bv Lord Clian- cellor (20160), out of Lady Richmond.— Mr. E" J. Coleman, 100 gs. Oxford Belle, roan, calved October 24, 1866 ; by Thirteenth Duke of Oxford (21604), out of Oxford Witch.— Mr. J. Robinson, Birkhampstead, 60 gs. Siddington 4th, roan, calved Marcli 14, 1S67; by Seventh Duke of York (17754), out of Siddington 2nd.— Lord Elles- mere, 600 gs. Carolina 7th, red, calved October 8, 1867; by Grand Duke 13th (21850), out of Carolina 5th.— Mr. E. J. Coleman 170 gs. Darlington 17th, red and white, calved January 29, 1868 ; by Eleventh Grand Duke (21849), out of Darlington 13th.— Mr. R. Loder, Whittfebury, SOU gs. Chaff 13th, roan, calved February 8, 1868 ; hy Second Earl of W^alton (19672), out of Clarissa. — Col. Loyd Lindsay, 270 gs. J :> Goneril 4th, roan, calved August 3, 1868 ; by Third Duke of Clarence (23727), out of Goneril— Not ufi'ered. Siddingtou 7th, roan, calved October 9, 1868 ; hy Seventh Duke of York (17754), out of Sicldington 3rd.— Lo-d litzhardinge, 750 gs. Fdir Maid of Collinsham, roan, calved April 22, 1869 • by Second Duke of Collinghara (23730), out of Fair Maid of lork.— Mr. A. Brogden, M.P., 300 gs. Lady Cambridge, roan, calved June 20, 1869, by Royal Cam bridge (25009), out of Lady Oxford. — Sir Wilfred Lavvson, Bart., 180 ga. Darlington 19th, roan, calved August 12, 1869; by Third Duke of Wharfdale (21619), out of DarUugton loth.— Mr. R. Loder, 050 gs. Princpss 4th, white, calved September 27, 1869 ; by Baron Oxford 3rd (25579), out of Princess 3rd. — Mr. A. Brogden, M.P., 300 gs. Winsome 9th, red, calved December 17, 1869 ; by Grand Duke 17th (24064), out of Winsome 2nd.— Mr. T. Wilson, Shotley, 505 gs. Marchioness 3r(], roan, calved J ulv 21, 1870 ; by Second Duke of Collingham (23730), out of Siddingtou 1st.— Lord EUes- mere, 600 gs. Dentsdale, red, calved September 14, 1870 ; by Second Duke of Collingham (23730), out of Darlington 15th.— Mr. R. Loder, 550 gs. Lady Laura Barrington, white, calved November 11, 1870; by Baron Oxford 4th (25580), out of Lady Ellen Barrington. — Duke of Devonshire, 305 gs. Barbon Belle, red and white, calved August 8, 1371 ; by Baron Oxford 3rd (25579), out of Oxford Belle.— Not offered. Baroness Bradwardine, roan, calved December 29, 1871 ; by Baron Oxford 3rd (25579), out ot Flora Mclvor.— Mr. J. Grant Morris, Liverpool, 165 gs. Duchess Gwynne 4th, roan, calved March 6th, 1872 ; by Baron Oxford 5th (27958), out of Duchess Gwynne 2nd. — Mr. R. Loder, 580 gs. W^insoradale, roan, calved Msreh 12, 1872 ; by Baron Oxford 4th (25580), out of Winsome 2ad. — Lord Fitzhardinge, 650 gs. Princess Gwynne 2nd, roan, calved May 6, 1872 ; by Royal Cambridge (25009), out of Duchess Gwynne. — Rsv. f. Graham, Lancashire, 250 gs. Cherry Queen, roan, calved October 3, 1872 ; by Baron Oxford 5th (27958), out of Cherry Princess.— Mr. J. W. Larkin, Ashdown, Sussex, 1,320 gs. Duchess Gwynne 5th, while, calved February 17th, 1873 ; by Grand Duke of Kent 2ud (2S759), out of IDuchess Gwynne 2ud.— Mr. T. Ilolford, Market Harborough. Era[)ress of Oxford, white, cilved February 26, 1873; by Grand Duke of Kent 2ud (28759), out of Grand Duchess of Oxford ISth.— Mr. T. Ilolford, 770 gs. Deepdale, roan, calved March 2, 1873 ; by Second Duke of Treguuter (26022), out of Darlington 17th.— Mr. G. Fox, Cheshire, 315 gs. Oxford Lily, white, roan ears, calved February 27, 1873; by Grand Duke of Kent 2nd (28759), out of Lady Oxford. — ^Ir. J. Pustlethwaite, Whitehaven, 130 gs. Clotilde, roan, calved March 12, 1873; by Grand Duke of Kent 2ud (28759), out of Chaif 13th. — Col. Loyd Lindsay, 250 gs. Underley Darling 2ud, roan, calved August 29, 1873 ; by Grand Duke of Kent 2nd (2S759), out of Underley Dwling. — ]\[r. J. Postlethvvaite, ^Miitehaven, 200 gs. Dentsdale 2nd, roan, calved July 21, 1873; hy Grand Duke of Kent 2ud (2S759), out of Deutsdale. — Lord Penrliyu 420 gs. Princess 6th, roan, calved August 29, 1873 ; by Grand Duke of Kent 2nd (28759), out of Princess 5th. — Marquis of lleadforf, Ireland, 450 gs. Fair Maid of Kent, roan, calved December 21, 1873 ; bv Grand Duke of Kent 2nd (28759), out of Fair Maid of Collinghara. — Marquis of Headfort, 275 gs. Lady Kendal, roan, Cilved March 7, 1874 ; by Grand Duke of Kent 2nd (28759), out of Lady Oxford.— Mr. J. Robinson, Berkhampsiead, I40gs. Lily Beckfoot, white, calved May 3, 1874; by Grand Duke of Kent 2nd (28759), outot Oxford Belle.— Mr. A. Staveley Hill, M.P., 40gs. Princess Sale, red, calved May 23, 1874 ; by Second Duke of Treguuter (26022), out of Lady Sale of Putney. — Sir John Swinhurn, 370 gs. Winsomdale 2ud, roan, calved June 4, 1874 ; by Second Duke oflVegunter (26022), out of Winsome 9th.— Mr. J. W^ Larkin, 330 gs. Princess 7th, roan, calvel July 10, 187'i ; by Second Duke of Treguuter (26022), out of Piiacess 4th.— Mr. W. H. Salt, 265 gs. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 333 Castalia, white, calved July 18, 1874 ; \>y Secoud Duke of Tregunter (26022), out of Chaff 13th.— Col. Loyd Lindsay, 70 gs. BULLS. Third Duke of Glo'ster, red, calved Decemher 1, 1872 ; by Tenth Duke of Tliorndale (28'i58), out of Duchess of Airdrie 8th.— Mr. E. J. Coleman, 900 gs. Grand Duke of Kent 2ud (28759), white, roan ears, calved May 12, 1870 ; by Lord Oxlord 2nd (20215), out of Grand Duchess 9th.— Mr. H. D. de Vitre, Berkshire, 750 gs. Marquis 3rd (31826), roan, calved July 13, 1871 ; by Second Duke of Coliinshara (23730), out of Siddingtou 7lh.— Capt. Gandy, 175 gs. Duke of Dentsdale 2nd, red and white, calved March 17 1873 ; by Second Duke of Tregunter (26022), out of Dar- lington 19th. — Mr. W. Hutchinson, Penrith, 125 gs. Duke of Kirklevington, roan, calved March 24«, 1873 ; by Second Duke of Tregunter (26022), out of Kirklevington 16th. — Sir Richard Musgrave, 305 gs. Lord Lunesdale Bates, red, calved March 26, 1873 ; by Baron Oxford 5tli (27958), out of Lady T'ndale Bates 2nd. — Mr. J. H. Caswell, Lincolnshire, 510 gs. Araadeus, white, calved July 14, 1873 ; by Grand Duke of Kent 2nd (28759), out of Princess 4th.— Mr. A. Dalzell, Workington, 61 gs. Duke of Tosca, roan, calved October 23, 1873 ; by Grand Duke of Kent 2nd (28759), out of Duchess Gwynne.— Mr. M. Kennedy, Ulverstoue, 300 gs. Marquis 4th, white, calved November 23, 1873 ; by Grand Duke of Kent 2nd (28759), out of Siddington 6th.— Mr. Williamson, Cheshire, 220 gs. Marquis 6th, roan, calved December 16, 1873; by Grand Duke of Kent 2Qd (28759), out of Marchioness 2nd.— Major Webb, Tamworth, 330 gs. Ostrogoth, roan, calved December 24, 1873 ; by Grand Duke of Kent 2nd (28759), out of Turk's Darling— Messrs. S. and J. Lindow, Park House, Whitehaven, 330 gs. Lord of Garsdale, white, calved January 21, 1874 ; by Grand Duke of Kent 2nd (28759), out of Duchess Gwynne 2nd. — Mr. W. H. Wakefield, Sedgwick, 115 gs. Visigoth, roan, calved April 25, 1874 ; by Grand Duke of Kent 2nd (28759), out of Winsome 2nd.— Mr. ¥. W. Lowe, Tipperary, 120 gs. Duke of Dentsdale 3rd, roan, calved May 5, 1874; by 2nd Duke of Tregunter (26022), out of Darlington 19th.— Marquis of Headfort, 110 gs. Lawrence Barrington, roan, calved July 14, 1874 ; by 2nd Duke of Tregunter (26022), out of Lady Laura Barton.— Mr. C. A. Barnes, Hertfordshire, 100 gs. Summary. 40 cows averaged i'382 11 10 £15,303 15 0 15 bulls „ 311 11 5 4,673 11 0 55 bead 363 4 6 £19.977 6 0 The following first-class bulls were sold by permission of Lord Bective, after the dispersion of the Underlej herd : lloyal Cambridge Gwynne (29849) (Mr. Wilson's), rich roan, calved November 22,1868; by Royal Cambridge (25009), out of Duchess Gwynne.— Mr. Becton,40 gs. Charmer Duke Echter 3rd (Mr. Fawcett's), white, calved Janaury 1, 1874 ; by Eighth Duke of York (28480), out of Constancy. — Mr. Marshall, 41 gs. Lord Spencer (Mr. Fawcett's), rich roan, calved December 4, 1873; by Eighth Duke of York (28480), out of Oxford's Juliana. — Mr T. C. Thompson, Kirkhouse, Bramptou, 62 gs. THE LATE MR. GIBBON'S HERD. This sale took place at Holmescales, between Kirby Lonsdale and Oxenholme, in consequence of the early and sudden death of Mr. H. J. Gibbon. The larger portion of the herd was sold last year at Storr's, and now it only numbered 15 head, consisting mostly of cows and calves, and two old bulls of Booth blood. The cattle had run out with their calves and vrere wholly unprepared for sale; moreover a steady downpour all day long detracted from their appearance. There were four lots descended from the Aylesby herd, and these were most in request. Golden Star, a plain red and white, but a well formed sweet-looking cow, hadbred an extraordinarily good red bull-calf, and Mr. Waldo, of Keat, bought the cow at 180 gs., and Mr. Miller, of Singleton, the calf at 105 gs. It is not at all improbable he may be seen at the lloyal next ye\ The Rev. J. Micklethwaite bought both the other G ien heifers at 135 gs. and 100 gs. respectively. Eai )f Clare, a Mantalini bull in use, was plain in colour an(^ tmall in stature; Mr. Beattie bought him at 56 gs., and 1 rince of Imperial (32142) of the Bliss tribe, a large roan, broad horned bull, somewhat deficient in his fore-quarters, goes to Mr. H. Fawcett, of Leeds, at 110 gs. A set of Coates' Herd-book brought 21 gs., and the Royal Society's Journal 20 gs., well- bound. Thus the " great Shorthorn drama" was concluded in three acts, after what in Loudon phrase may be called a brilliant and successful performance to crowded houses, and it is likely that the Shorthorns will still con- tinue to hold the public estimation for many years to come. One noticeable feature in all the sales was that the best beast made the most money. SALE OF MR, RICHARDSON'S SHORTHORNS. BY MR. THORNTON. For thirty years and more Mr. J. M. Richardson has kept a few Shorthorns round about the green pastures at Hutton. Within a short distance is Netherscales, Blen- cow, Skelton, and other places, well known for good blood, and Mr. Untbank was the means of inducing Mr. Eichardson to keep a good beast as he has many other breeders. He started him with the Diamonds, a short pedigree tribe, originating with a good Darlington cow, on which Gainford (2044), one of the best and most favourite sires that ever came into the district, was put. Thalberg, one of Mr. Troutbeck's Gwynne bulls, was mated with the produce, and begot a heifer which, in her turn, brought forth Dewdrop to Captain Shaftoe. Mr. Unthank bred a heifer from the sort which beat everything around, even the Lowther cattle. By his bull Lofty, Diamond was begotten from Dewdrop, and there were several of the tribe in the herd which, al- though small, yet contained many useful animals. The most favourite trite was the Gwynne, of which there were three females. The Pearls, of Crofton blood, but well-known at Nunwick, had many representatives and several good animals. With two or three odd lots the catalogue was completed. When Mr. Richardson first started breeding, he was a great feeder and exhibitor ; hut in time he gave up showing, and went more in for milk and lower keeping. The Pearls were quite after his heart in this matter — neat, well-formed, handsome, stylish cattle : they did their duty at the pail by giving 20 to 25 quarts daily. They were no great flesh carriers, yet some of them were capital cows. Lot 2, Pearl 9th, thin and well-shaped, was kept in the county by Mr. J. C, Bow stead at 55 gs. ; but the nest lot. Pearl 10th, made a guinea more, and goes to Mr. Tisdall, at Holland Park, Kensington. One of the best lots. Pearl 12th was brought in with a large bull-calf beside her. After some good bidding from the Rev. O. James, Mr. Brunton secured her at 78 gs. for Kelso. He also purchased what may be considered the best lot in the sale. This was Riot, a roau two-year-old heifer, down calving. She had a grand top and ribs, but stood a little close on her legs, and was plain about the head. Still Sir Richard Musgrave had a great fancy for her, and bid 100 gs., but Mr Bruutoii took hiv across the Border too ) 334 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. at 105 g8, Mr. Gow got a handsome Pearl calf, lot 17, at 44 gs., and two or three others to go to Northumber- land. Princess Gwynne, lot 5, a large-framed handsome roan cow, came through JMr. Caddy's stock, which he got at Blencow in 1839. Having lost two quarters, and being recently served, she was uot everybody's money. She had bred two calves. Mr. Smith, however, gave 100 gs. for her, and 72 gs. for her calf, to join the Storr's herd. The calf was a handsome roan by Mr. Toppin's Knight of Killerby. Mr. Toppin bid well for the calf, having purchased her elder sister. Agues Gwynne, very cheap at 51 gs. Sir K. Musgrave bought Diamond 5th, a good red heifer, by Mr. Lamb's prize bull Ignoramus, at 41 gs., and Mr. Lamb gave the same price for Dia- mond 4th, by Mr. Saunders' Waterloo Boy. Lot 4, Patchouli 5th, a stylish true-made cow, bred by Mr. Christy in Essex, was purchased by Mr. Unthank for 60 gs., after competition with Mr. Heskett ; her calf, a young bull, went for 21 gs., but there is little demand for bull-calves in that season of the year and in that part of the country. A few dairy cows went cheap. The sale thi'oughout was slow, yet it averaged well, the seventeen cows and heifers making 55 gs. each, and the seven bull- calves £25. Sir Henry Vane presided at the lunch, where a goodly company assembled to congratulate Mr. Richardson on his restoration to health after a long and serious illness, and which was the cause of the sale. A few drizzly showers fell, and soon after the sale was con- cluded it became a down pour — little needed, as harvest is still out, and the fields are as fresh and as green as at May -day. COWS AND HEEFERS. Diamond 2nd, roan, calved March 20, 1867, by British Cherry (23461), out by Diana by Baron of Ravensworth (17380). —Mr. J. Eenton, 37 gs. Pearl 9th, roan, calved February 16, 1868, by British Cherry (23461), out of Pearl 6th by Welcome Guest (1549?).— Mr. J. C. Bowstead, 55 gs. Pearl 10th, red, calved May 11, 1868, by British Cherry (23461), out by Pearl 7th by Lablache 2nd (20092).— Mr. E. C.Tisdall,56gs. Patchouli 5th, red, calved April 6, 1869, by Mandarin (26799), out of Patchouli 4th by Duke of Grafton (21594).— Mr. J. Unthank, 60 gs. Princess Gwynne, roan, calved November 17, 1869, by Knight of Santon (24275), out of Dainty Gwynne by Sir Windsor (22927).— Rev. T. Staniforth, 100 gs. Primrose, roan, calved March 25, 1870, by Kirbythore Waterloo (24263), out of Red Rose 4th by Royal Oxford (22795).— Sir R. C. Musgrave, 40 gs. Red and white cow-calf.— Mr. T. Gow. 11 gs. Diamond 3rd. red, calved October 25, 1870, by Inglewood (28892), out of Diamond 2nd by British Cherry (23461).— Mr. D. Bragg, 36 gs. Waterloo 29th, red and white, calved November 30, 18 70, by Grand Duke of Lightburne 2nd (26291), out of Waterloo 26th by Ravenspur (20628).— Mr. R. Jefferson, 45 gs. Pearl 12lh, red, calved March 18, 1871, by Lord of Nunwick (26702), out of Pearl 9th by British Cherry (23461).— Mr. J. Brunton, 78 gs. Pearl 13th, red, calved August 30, 1871, by Lord Bates (29065), out of Pearl 10th by British Cherry (23461).— Rev. 0. James, 46 gs. Riot, roan, calved December 27, 1871, by RosoUo (32346), out of Reckless by Mandarin (26799).— Mr. J. Brunton, 105 gs. Diamond 4th, red, calved March 30, 1872, by Waterloo Boy (27762), Diamond 2nd by British Cherry (23461).— Mr. J. Lamb, 41 gs. Agnes Gwyune, roan, calved November 9, 1872, by Lord Bates (29064), out of Princess Gwynne by Knight ol Santon (24275).-Mr. J. C. Toppin, 51 gs. ^o'^oqI^*''' '■^'^' '^^^•^'^ ^^'■'='' 10« 1S73, by Ignoramus (a»»87), out of Diamond 2nd by British Cherry (23461). —Sir R. C. Musgrave, 41 gs. J \ J Polly Gwynne, roan, calved January 9, 1874, by Knight o f Killerby (29000), out of Princess Gwynne by Knight of Santon (24375).— Rev. T. Staniforth, 72 gs. Diamond 6th, red and white, calved April 10, 1874, by Stack- house (32591), out of Diamond 2ud by British Cherry (23461).— Mr. T. Gow, 13 gs. Pearl 14th, red, calved August 1, 1874, by Knight of Killerby {390U0), out of Pearl 10th by British Cherry (23461).— Mr. T. Gow, 44 gs. Strawberry, roan dairy cow. — Rev. 0. James, 20 gs. White Rose, white dairy cow, three years old. — Mr. R. Thom- son, 14 gs. Tulip, roan dairy cow, three years old. — Mr. Robinson, 17 gs. White heifer, calved in 1872.— Mr. B. Sweeton, 15 gs. Ruby, roan heifer, calved m March, 1873. — Mr. Robinson, 18 gs. White Rose 2nd, white, calved May 2, 1874.— Mr. T. Gow, 5i- gs. BULLS. Lilywhite, white, calved April 8, 1873, by Lord Bates (29065), out of Pearl 9th by British Cherry (23461).— Mr. .1. Bainbridge, 26 gs. Familiar Pearl, roan, calved January 5, 1874, by Marquis of Lome (31847), out of Pearl 12th by Lord of Nunwick (26702).— Mr. H. Walker, 35 gs. Duke of Edinbiirgli, red and a little white, calved January 20, 1874, by Knight of Killerby (29000), out of Diamond 3rd by Inglewood (28892).— Mr. Bleasdale, 20 gs. Killerby Pearl, red roan, calved March 23, 1874, by Knight of Killerby (29000), out of Pearl 9th by British Cherry (23461).— Sir H. R. Vane, Bart., 20 gs. The Do -tor, red, calved April 18, 1874, by Waterloo Boy (27763) oat of Waterloo 39th by Grand Duke Lightburne 2nd (26291).— Mr. A. Graham, 80 gs. Romulus, red and white, calved Mav 25, 1874, by Stackhouse (33591), out of Pearl 13th by Lord Bates (29065).— Mr. J. Jardine, 15 gs. Comet, roan, calved July 14, 1874, by Bloomfieid, out of Patchouli 5th, by Mandarin (26799).— Mr. Wm. Graham, 21 gs. SiTMMAilY. £ s. d. £ s. d. 17 cows averaged 57 10 0 977 11 0 7buUs „ 25 1 0 175 7 0 24 averaged ... 6 dairy cows £48 0 9 £1,152 18 0 93 19 6 Total sale £1,246 17 6 SALE OF MR. CHEYNEY'S SHORT- HORNS. At Gaddesby, Leicester, on September 23rd. BY MR. H. STRAFFORD. That " he had found a district housed in brick and left it under stone" was once thought a boast which did credit to an emperor, but it may be doubted if some visitors to Leicestershire, in September 1874, would consider such a change would invariably prove to be a gain. For no stone that ever was quarried could give the warmth to the landscape in Gaddesby Park which is afforded by the bricks of which the hall is built. No tint could come out better on a bright day, in early autumn — when the sun has lost power, but scarcely brilliancy — than does the yellow-red of the mansion in contrast with the hoary church adjacent and the dark- green of the elms and the herbage in the park. The country between this and Melton Mowbray — noted for horse-flesh living and for swine-flesh dead — would scarcely be improved did Baron Haussman get a commis- sion to reconstruct the dwellings a /a Parisian Boule- vardes. But the master of Gaddesby has thought if the local building material cannot be improved on the local Shorthorns may ; for into a tract of the richest grazing land, famous for fatted beeves for ages. THE FAEMEK'S MAGAZINE. 335 he has imported the most fashionable strains of blood which are at present to be found in the States. Other breeders have done the like, no doubt ; but the attend- ants at English Shorthorn sales have not encountered before the produce of the late consignment of " Princess" animals from America. A heifer-calf from " Lady Sale of Putney" was, indeed, sold at Underlay the other day ; but she was hardly old enough to show the character developed beyond the Atlantic, by descendants of exported specimens of a tribe which, on this side, has always been deservedly esteemed. Many visitoi-s were curious to see these Princess cattle, especially as English-bred Princesses were to be sold at the same time and place, and so an excellent opportunity would be atforded for comparison. Accordingly a large company assembled on the twenty- third, day and locality both being favourable, yet certain magnates (among the Bates courtiers) were conspicuously away. Every care had been taken to set the lots off to advantage, and to arrange the sale so as to secure a high average, and the result must have been beyond expecta- tion. Before men have ceased to talk — like Uncle Toby's scullion with foolish fat face of praise — about Holker and Underley price, these are as much exceeded (jo far as females go) as they themselves surpassed every previous auction of a Shorthorn herd. It is not our intention to enlarge on this fact, but it must needs be chronicled. la 1873 Mr. Cheney sold 35 animals for £10,307 17s. In 1874 19 females (mostly calves) make £10,720 10s., or an average of £564 4s. Od. for the whole lot offered. It is best to let the facts speak for themselves, and make no comment. As we have intimated, " every card turned up a trump." Weather, fashion, state of the money market, all were " as could be wished." And the crowded tables at the luncheon assured one that a sufficient regiment of customers were present to buy up not merely the lots offered, but the reserved herd as well. These were in the park, but in the remotest part of it, so that our inspection was confined to the sale cattle and the old imported bull. Many have criticised 9th Duke of Geneva. It must be conceded now that — such is the present feeling among wealthy Shorthorn buyers- no bull's stock ever were sold at such a high figure. Yet the contrast between the prices made by the bulls, as compared with the heifers, is a fact, as well as the high average of these, as is also the curious confinement of the list of buyers within the limit of that of ])revious com- petitors for similar animals. Mr. A. II. Longman, we believe, bid high for one of the Duchess lots ; but, as a rule, there were few new bidders, and not one new buyer. There were two of the animals offered whose portraits appear in the last volume of the Herd-Book — Eighth DuchessofAirdrie and Kirklevington 18th. The former was substituted at the last minute for her daughter, who had calved, and been unlucky. It must be said that this Eighth Duchess— who is reported to have cost 10,000 dollars " on the other side of the water"^was a fine slashing, if somewhat leggy, cow, heavy in calf; as was also Kirklevington 18th, who — except the characteristic " nipping-in" behind the shoulders, and this by no means to a great extent — was a heavy, good cow, on very short legs. When 8th Duchess came into the sale-ring, which was soon after two o'clock, the chairman at the luncheon, Mr. Cheney himself, having wisely curtailed the lists of toasts— no healths were drunk save that of the Royal family and his own — the cow provoked a good deal of admiration, but no very eager bidding. She was, however, put up at 1,000 gs., and rose slowly till the price given below was reached, and she goes to take the place, at Havering, vacated by Grand Duchess 21st. Lady Waterloo 22nd, with her calf (lot 19), came next into the ring, and the bidding, begun by Mr. Bowley at 100 gs., rose slowly to 225 gs., at which, if fashion holds. she should not be dear. Peach Blossom 8th, the only white female shown, began at an offer of 50 gs., but made her value, even taking into account her being stinted to the I'.inth Duke of Geneva. When the next lot— the first of the daughters of the old Princess cow, for which Mr. Adkins gave Mr. Stephenson 100 gs., and sold her, after having had four calves, to Mr. Cheney for thnce as much — Princess of Geneva, came into the ring the sale became very lively, and she ran up Irom 200 to 800 gs. without much effort from the auctioneer. Mr. Mcintosh got her, with an in-calf to her own sire, for 860 gs., and yet she was not the dearest lot sold Her own sister was equally in request. They were two nice heifers, if somewhat dark in their roan hue. Cleo- patra's Duchess coming, like the meat in a sandwich, between the two, was not without admirers ; nor was Seraphina's Duchess (lot 7), who goes, as her companion, to Stancliffe Hall. Then came a red and white Oxford heifer, whose appearance acted like a wet blanket on the bidders, and she was dragged up to 200 gs., then went briskly to 310 gs. by an old admirer of the tribe- The next lot. Duchess of Glo'ster, a charming red year- ling, revived the sale, and, beginning, like the elder Duchess, at 1,000 gs., went up steadily to 1,700 gs., when the pace slackened. At 1,750 gs. she was knocked down, and Sir Curtis Lampson's name given as buyer; but a little demur caused her to be put up again, and she finally made 1,785 gs. to the same purchaser. Lady Elizabeth, first of the Princesses, shared the fate of those who enter next—" a well-graced actor having quitted the stage" — for she was coldly received, and waited for an opening bid of 200 gs. for some minutes. She was leggy and of a plain colour,"yet her dam wasagood cow with a fine bag, and her own brother about the best of the bull calves. Lady Waterloo 28th was a very good heifer, of a capital red ; and Seraphina's Duchess 2nd, a not much inferior roan ; nor was Wild Duchess of Geneva 3rd, the lot following these, far behind. After seeing three such calves by one sire, it is impossible to withhold from him the credit of having " that within which passeth show," for these assuredly have the grace of beauty, which he lacks. Rosalie— lot 14, got by an American Princess bull from an ex-American Princess cow — kept the ball a- rolling, and made 700 gs. readily ; and after her the in- terestlaken in the lots perceptibly diminished, as Mr. Strafford's labour increased. From this time the sale was slow, the biddings coming tardily from a limited number of competitors, till with the first bull the spirit of the thmg evaporated. The bulls were sold indeed, but they took some selling, and any person conversant with the strains they represented will compare with surprise the prices made for bull-calves here and at Underley for similar animals. It cannot be said that the calves had been badly done by ; animals more plainly speaking of good and liberal usage never entered a ring, and they were gay- coloured, well-haired, stylish calves of their type. Mr. Pavin Davies' four Kirklevington cows were good specimens, and made good prices, though possibly the Bates men will not allow this ; but over the sale of the extra bulls it is best " to draw a veil" and retire : they did not do the blood credit, and did not get the credit their appearance deserved. Lord Garland was a nice bull, but the company had begun to disperse, for the hour for starting the " special" from Brooksby was at hand. Altogether it was a remarkable and a suggestive sale, both for what was done and what was not. Eighth Duchess of Airdrie, calved July 10th, 1867, by Royal Oxford, out of Duchess of Airdrie 7th.— -Mr. Mackintosh, 1,700 gs. Lady Waterloo 22ncl, calved January 10th, 1871, by 7th Duke of York, out of Lady Waterloo 15th.— Mr. G. Fox, 325 gs. J36 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE Feach Blossom 8th, calved June 25tli, 1871, by 8tli Duke of York, out of Peach Blossom 6th. — Colonel Kinffscote, 185 gs. Princess of Geneva, calved August 3rd, 1871, by 9th Duke of Geneva, out of Princess. — ]\Ir. Mackintosh, 860 gs. Cleopatra's Duchess 2nd, calved June 18th, 187-2, by 9th Duke of Geneva, outof Cleopatra 12th.— Sir J. VVhitworth 300 gs. Princess of Geneva 2nd, calved October 15tb, 1873, by 9th, Duke of Geneva, outof Princess. — Mr. II. J. Sheldon, 800 gs. Seraphina's Duchess, calved November 16th, 1873, by 9th Duke of Geneva, out of Seraphina 22nd.— Sir J. Whitworth, 160 gs. Lady Oxford 15th, calved May 1st, 1873, by 9th Dake of Geneva, out of 13th Lady of Oxford. — Mr. P. Davies, 310gs. Duchess of Glocesfer, calved July 10th, 1873, by 9th Duke of Geneva, out of I'ith Duchess of Airdrie, — Sir Curtis Lamp- son, 1,785 gs. Lady Elizabeth, calved July 13th, 1873, by 9th Duke of Geneva, out of Primula. — Mr. Leney, 430 gs. Lady Waterloo 28tli, calved August 30th, 1873, by 9th Duke of Geneva, out of Lady Waterloo 19th.— Mr. G. Fox, 530 gs. Seraphina's Duchess 2nd, calved December 8th, 1873, by 9th Duke of Geneva, out of Seraphina 22nd, — Lord Pen- rhyn, 200 gs. Wild Duchess of Geneva 3rd, calved December 26th, 1873, by 9th Duke of Geneva, out of Wild Oxford.— Mr. Gow, 555 gs. Rosalie, calved February 23rd, 1874, by Saladin, out of Rosette. —Mr. G. Fox, 700 gs. Fantail's Duchess 2nd, calved February 28th, 1874, by 9th Duke of Geneva, out of Fantail. — Mr. J. Lynn, 135 gs. Lady Wellesley, calved May 16, 1874, by yth Duke of Geneva, out of Lady Wellington.— Mr. P. Davies, 360 gs. Geneva's Minstrel 2nd, calved May 20th, 1874, by 9th Duke of Geneva, out of Minstrel 3rd. — Mr. W. H. Salt, 260 gs. Lady of Oxford 16th, calved June 28th, 1874, by 9tli Duke of Geneva, out of 13th Lady of Oxford. — Mr. John Thornton, 605 gs. Lady Waterloo 29th, calved August 26th, 1874, by 9th Duke of Geneva, out of Lady Waterloo 22nd. — Mr. Gow, 110 gs. BULLS. Master Faithful, calved July 12, 1873, by Credit, out of Fidelity 2nd. — Mr. Beauford, Liverpool, 50 gs. Duke of Goscote 2nd, calved November 23rd, 1873, by 9th Duke of Geneva, out of Darlington 12th. — Mr. H. H. Lang- ham, Cottesbrooke-grangp, 60 gs. Earl of Leicester 3rd, calved December 16th, 1873, by Royal Cambridge 2nd, out of Princess of Geneva. — Jlr. Cotterill Dormer, 90 gs. Earl of Leicester 4th, calved March 20th, 1874, by 9th Duke of Geneva, out of Lady Susan 3rd.— Mr. Tliomas, 120 gs. Earl of Leicester 5th, calved March 21st, 1874, by 9th Duke of Geneva, out of Princess. — Mr. C. Howard, 68 gs Earl of Leicester 6th, calved April 15th, 1874, by Saladin, out of Rose Ann. — Mr. Smith, Leicester, 73 gs. Lord Blanche, calved May 20th, 1874, by 9th Duke of Geneva, out of Lady Blanche.--Mr. F. Minton, Stoke, near Grantham, 45 gs. Earl of Leicester 7th, calved July 12th, 1874, by 9th Duke of Geneva, out of Primula. — Mr. F. Sartoris, 60 gs. Summary. 19 heifers averaged £564 4 9 £10,720 10 0 8 bulls „ 74 5 9 '596 8 0 27 head £il9 1 4, £11,314 16 0 FROM MR. PAVIN DAVIES' HERD. Kirklevington I8th, calved August 26th, 1866, by 3rd Lord Oxford, out of Kirklevington 10th — Mr. W. H. Salt, 585 gs. Kirklevington Duchess 2nd, calved December 31st, 1868, by Duke of Athelstane8,out of Kirklevington, 9th.— Mr. J. H. Casswell, 410 gs. Kirklevington Duchess 6th, calved June 23rd, 1870, by 2nd Duke of Claro, out of Kirklevington 18th. — Mr. Snodin 285 gs. Kirklevington Duchess 12th, calved November 6th, 1872, by 2nd Duke of Gloucester, out of Kiiklevington Rose. — Mr. J. H. Casswell, 250 gs. Marquis of York (property of Mr. W. H. Salt) calved January 26th, 1871, by 7th Duke of York, outof Lndy Waterloo 14th.— Mr. J. J. Sbarpe, 40 gs. Duke of Cerisia 2nd (property of Mr. H. J. Sheldon) calved Dec. 20th, 1872, by 18th Duke of Oxford, outof Cherry Countess. — Mr. J. Lynn, 35 gs. Lord Garland (property of Mr. H. J. Sheldon), calved July 4th, 1873, by 18ih Duke of Oxford, out of Lady Florence.— Mr. Fielding, 62 gs. SALE OF SUFFOLK HORSES AND OTHER STOCK AT COVEHITHE. There were aeveuty-live head of horse stock, including six young chesnut cart stallions, two of which are winners at the various local and other agricultural shows; forty-two brood mares and geldings, aud twenty-two cart colts, fillies and foals, and four hunters and harness horses. In addition to the horse stock there were 1,180 blackfaced ewes and half-bred lambs, eighty-four Short- horn beasts, and eight Shorthorn cows, besides all the implements. The sale took place under the direction of the executors of the late Mr. S. C. Goodwyn. For Mr. Goodwyn's horses the prices were : I. Fancy, a cart mare, sold lo Mr. Beakbanc, Liverpool, for 97^ gs. 2. Smart, to Mr. Havers, for 67i gs. 3. Scot, to Mr. Havers, 62^ gs. 4. Diamond, to Mr. Woods, 55 gs. 5. Tinker, a gelding. — Mr. Pratt, 55 gs. 6. Farmer. — Mr. Chaplin, 72^ gs. 7. Captain.— Earl Dudley, 60 gs. 8. Raraper. — Earl Dudley, 85 gs. 9. Spright, a cart mare. — Mr. Beakbane, 125 gs. 10. Moggy, a cart mare. — Jlr. Beakbaue, 115 gs. II. Briton.- Mr. A. Garrett, 80 gs. 12. Darby.— Earl Dudley, 80 gs. 13. Smart, a Suffolk mare.— Mr. Pratt, 52^- gs. 14. Lively. — Earl Dudley, 105 gs. 15. Brag. — Mr. Brown, 52^ gs. 16. Boxer, a goldiug. — Mr. I'earee, 40 gs. 17. Briton.— Earl Dudley, 60 gs. 18. Captain. — Mr. Scace, 65 gs. 19. Proctor. — Messrs. Lucas Brothers, London, 65 gs. 20. Sharper. — Messrs. Lucas Brothers, 60 gs. 21. Bumper. — Messrs. Lucas Brothers, 87^ gs. 22. Moggy — Messrs. Lucas Brothers, 72^ gs. 23. Darby.— Earl Dudley, 9 2^ gs. 24. Ely.- Mr. Grirnwade, 52^ gs. 25. Ramper.- Mr. Pratt, 62^ gs. 26. Captain.— Mr. Kirby, 34 gs. 28. Dodman.— Blr. Cragg, 17 gs. 29. Hero, a chesnut cart stallion, two years old, by Young Conqueror. — Mr. Talbot, Kilkenny, 185 gs. 30. Captain, a chesnut Suffolk cart stallion, by the late Mr. T. Crisp's Duke. — Mr. J. Grout, 95 gs. The property of jMr. Richard Garrett, of Carleton : The Claimant, a pure Suffolk cart stallion, by Cupbearer.— Earl Dudley, 200 gs. Challenger, a Suffolk cart stallion, by Cupbearer. — Mr. Westhorp, 100 gs. Two lots, the property of the executors of the late Mr. James B. Cooper, of Blythburgh Lodge, and Mr. James Deck, of \\ estleton, were also sold at 62 gs. and 55 gs., and a number of other cart horses at lower figures. Mr. Goodwyn's bullocks, cows, sheep, lambs, and dead stock were disposed of on Thursday. The result of the sale was between £8,000 and £9,000. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 337 SHEEP SALES AND LETTINGS. SALES OP LAMBS AT PERTH. — Messrs. Mmc- donald and Fraser held their secoud special sale c>f store lambs. The numbers penned were over 8,000, of wliicli 5,000 were crosses, 1,500 lialf aud three-part breds, and 1,500 blackfaced lambs. The atteudance of buyers was large, aai( , from the beginning to the close of the sale, a steady demand was experienced fur all sorts at prices similar to those realised at the special sale ten days ago. Cross lambs, best c'ass of tops, sold from 17s. 6d. to 2Ls. ; fair to good sorts of tops, same class, 13s. 3d. to IGs. 6d. ; secondary sorts 10s. 3d. to 128. 3d. Half and three-part bred lambs, best class of tops, 31s. to 25s. ; fair to good, same class, IGs. 6d. to 18s. 6d. ; secondary sorts, lis. iSd. to 15s. 9d. Blackfaced middling ewe lambs, 10s. to 13s. Shotts, 7s. 6d. to 9s. Blackfaced wether lambs, 5s. 3d. to 10s. Tlie usual weekly sale com- prised 194 sheep, 121 cattle, and 3 cows. Both sheep and cattle met a slow tale. Cross hoggs, secondary sorts, sold from 25s. to 27s. One-year-old cattle, £6 7s. 7d. to £8 10s. ; two-year-olds, small sorts, £11 5s. to £13 17s. Od. each. MR C. CLARKE'S LINCOLNS.— At the sule at Scopwick the following purchases were made : Lot 1, Mr. J. Kirkham, 2-1 gs. ; 2, Mr. Slater, 10 gs. ; 3, ditto, 11 gs. ; 4, Mr. T. Kirkham, 115 gs. ; 5, Mr. Bond, 8 es. ; 6, Mr. Wiles, 9 gs. ; 7, Mr. Foster, 13 gs ; 8, Mr. R. Kirkham, ]5gs. ; 9, Mr. Stephenson, 10 gs. ; 10, Mr. E. Paddison, 68 gs. ; 11, Mr. Coleman, 45 gs. ; 12, Mr. W. Dndding, 28 gs. ; 13, Mr. Pitchell, 8 gs. ; 14, Mr. T. Pears, 14 gs. ; 15, Mr. Chapman, 13| gs. ; 16, Mr. T. Caswell, 70 gs. ; 17, Mr. Taylor, 7i gs. ; 18, Mr. Coleman, 9 gs. ; 19, Mr. Tindall, 7^ gs. ; 29, Mr. H. Mackinder, 26 gs. ; 21, Mr. Holmes, 21 gs. ; 22, Mr. Slater, 48 gs. ; 23, Mr. Marshall, 16 gs. ; 24, Mr. Trotter, 7 gs. ; 25, Mr. Marshall, 13 gs. ; 26, Mr. Shillito, 20 gs. ; 27, Mr. T. Pears, 13 gs. ; 28, Mr. Mellows, 9 gs. ; 29, Mr. Howard, 11 gs. ; 30, Mr. C. Clarke, 20 gs. ; 31, BIr. W. GiUatt, 36 gs. ; 32, Mr. Holmes, 12 gs. ; 33, Mr. H. Paddisou, 7| gs. ; 34, Mr. Tindall, 6k gs. ; 35, Mr. G. Blaud, 12^ gs. ; 36, Mr. W. Dndding, 10 gs. ; 37, Mr. Phillips, 8 gs. ; 38, Mr. Mellows, 1 1 gs. ; 39, Mr. Lamb, 7i gs. ; 40, Mr. T. Pears, 7i gs. ; 41, Mr. T. Stephenson, 7i gs. ; 42, Mr. Maun, 11 gs. ; 43, Mr. Tindall, 6i gs. ; 44, Mr. W. Budding, 11 gs. ; 45, Mr. G. Bland, 8| gs.; 46, Mr. W. Cappe, 10^ gs. ; 47, Mr. Bainbridge, 6^ gs.j; 48, Mr. While, 6^ gs. ; 49, Mr. Wiles, 7 gs. ; 50, Mr. Morris, 15 gs. ; 51, Mr. Stephenson, 6^ gs. ; 52, Mr. C. Paddison, 7^ gs. ; 53, Mr. Harrison, 6 gs. Two-shears : 54, Messrs. Lister and Byron, 100 gs. ; 58, Mr. Trotter, 12 gs. The entire lots made £1,082 lis., or an average of £19 13s. 8d. each. MR. BORTON'S LEICESTERS. — At the sale at Barton, near Malton, Mr. Stafford, of Bedford, being the auctioneer, many of the sheep were bought for New Zea- land, and several for Ireland. The following is the result of the sale : SiiKAKLiNG Rams. — Mr. Gray, 21 gs. ; Mr. Smith, New Zealand, 2U gs., 15 gs., 22 gs., 30 gs., 12 gs., aud 10 gs. ; Mr. Key, Musley Bauk, 16 gs. aud 10 gs. : Hou. C. W. W. Eitzwilliam, M.P., 23 gs. ; Mr. Humphrey, Leicester, 51 gs. and 32 gs. ; Mr. Houlden, Wigganthorpe Hall, 66 gs. ; Mr. Tinker, 8 gs. ; Major Worsley 7i gs. ; Mr. Sinithson, 11 gs. ; Rev. C. P. Peach, 15 gs. ; The Earl of Favershara, 10 gs. and 20 gs. ; W. Robertson, Ireland, 8 gs., 10 gs., 9 gs., and 9 gs. ; Mr. Cattle, Barton, 9 gs. ; Mr. Leel'e, Fryton, 8j gs. ; Mr. West, 7^ gs., 8 gs., and 8 gs. ; Admiral Howard, 10 gs. ; Mr. Jackson, 17 gs. ; Mr. Geo. Wright, Broughtou, 40 gs. ; Mr. Scoby, 10 gs. ; Mr. Beech, Stockton, 10 gs. Two-Shear Rams.— Mr. West, 8 gs. and 10 gs. ; Mr. Robertson, 9 gs. ; Mr. Smithson, 10 gs. ; Mr. Tinker, 11 gs. and 30 gs.; Earl Feversham, 10 gs.; Mr. Beech, 18 gs., 10 gs., 12 gs., and 70 gs. ; Mr. Hattersley, 10 gs. ; EarlFitzwilliam , 20 gs. Three-Shear Rams. — Mr. Humphreys, 36 gs. aud 33 gs. ; Mr. Key, It gs. SuEARLii^G Ewes (Three in a lot). — Mr. Beech, 27 gs. ; Mr. Holden, 43^ gs., 27 gs., and 27 gs. ; Rev. C. P. Peach, 30 gs. ; Mr. Tinker, 24 gs. ; Mr. Allen, 24 gs. MEoUS. DUDDli\'G'S LINCOLNS. — Mr. Calihrop sold by public auction about seventy longwoolled rams, principally shearlings, the property of Messrs. Duddin?, at Pauton House, near Wragby. There were in all 70 lots ; the first six being let, and the others, which com- prised rams and lour old sheep, sold. For No. 4 there was a very strong competition, aud it was ultim itely knocked down to Mr. llesseltine for GO guineas. Tlie competition of the day, however, was for lot 58. This numbers had evidently set their minds on obtaining, althougli the principal competitors came from the ranks of the colonists. The bidding speedily mounted up, and at last became confined to Mr. Buchanan and Mr. Coleman, to the latter of whom it was ultimately knocked down for 200 gs., amidst the cheers ot'tliose standing around the ring. Mr. Coleman afterwards became the purchaser of lot 64 for the sum of 175 gs. The sale was altogether a most successful one. The average of the six rams let was £33 13s. 4d. ; of the lour old sheep, £27 16s. 9d. ; and of the rams sold £37 12s. 4d. ; the total average being estimated at £36 12s. lid. The following is the return of the prices realised : Lot. Gi 1— Mr. Kemp 13 2 — Mr. Laiigdale 15 3— Mr. R. Howard ... 30 4— Mr. Hesseltine ... 60 5 — Mr. Clias. Clark ... 45 6— Mr. Ghest 30 7_Mr. Wilson 21 8 — Mr. Coleman 125 9— Mr. Marshall 50 10— Mr. Dalton 57 11— Mr. Jones 29 12— Ditto 21 13— Mr. Coleman 110 14— Mr. Dulbell 25 15 — ilr. Banyard 45 16 — Mr Coleman 66 17_Mr. Strafford 16 18— Mr. Bennett 32 19— Mr. L:jngdale 40 20— Mr. Jones 40 21— Mr. Smith 21 22— Dit.o 40 23— Ditto 13 24— Mr. Hodgkinson... 30 25— Mr. Coleman 90 26— Mr. Eptou 18 27— Mr. Smith 22 28— Mr. Coleman 47 29— Mr. Dolbin 18 30 — Mr. Coleman 65 31— Mr. Russell 20 32— Mr. Coleman 31 33— Mr. Dolbell 11 34— Mr. Smith 9.0 35 — -Mr. Jones 25 Lot. Gs. 36— Mr. Wilsou 24 37— Mr. Epton 16 38— Mr. Jones 14 39— Mr. Dolbell 12 40— Mr. Elward 33 41— Mr. Livesey 16 42— Mr. Turnbull 37 43— Mr. Jones 27 44— Mr. Smith 23 4.5— Mr. Dolbell 21 46— Mr. Strafford 14 47— Mr. Smith 13 48— Ditto 24 49— Mr. Hod.son 13 50— Mr. Lamb 32 51 — Mr. Jones 34 52 — Mr. Coleman 36 53— Mr. Jones 17 54— Mr. Smith 16 55— Mr. Chambers 13 56— Mr. Smith 1? 57— Mr. McVicar 21 58— Mr. Coleman 200 59— Mr.Smith 18 60— Ditto 14 61— Mr. Coleman 28 62— Mr. R.Howard ... 38 63— Mr. Smith 34( 64 — Mr. Coleman 175 65— Mr. Giles 13 66 — Mr. Jones 21 67— Mr. H. Nelson ... 38 68— Mr. Davy 31 69— Mr. Banyard 17 70— Mr. Luugdale 2u RAM SALES AT HEREFORD.— Messrs. Edwards and Weaver sold a number of Shropshire rams, the property of Mr. ¥: Evans, Bredwardine, which were dis- posed of as follows : F'our shearling rams, 35 gs., to Mr. J. Turner, Stanfonon-Arrow; shearling ram, 12 gs., to Mr. J. Like, Mansel Lacey ; ditto, 8 gs., to Mr. S. Evans, Parton ; ditto, 6 gs., to Mr. J. Marston ; ditto, 7 gs., to Mr. Williams, Glasbury ; ditto, 11,| gs., to Mr. Farr ; ditto, 9 gs., to Mr. James, Monuingtou : ditto, 8^ gs., to Mr. G. Bray, Haven ; ditto, 4 guineas, to Mr. Williams, Glasbury ; ditto, 14 guineas, to Mr. Nicholas Price, The Tliornes, Ledbury ; ditto, 10 guineas, to Mr. H. Griffiths, Brick House ; ditto, 8 guineas, to Mr. T. Goodwin, Hampton Bishop. Average £11 I4s. 6d. The property of Col. Bridgford ; shearling Shropshire ram, sold to Mr. Gwilliam, 5^ guineas ; ditto to Mr. Hodges, The Moor, for 7j guiueas. Messrs. I'ye and Sunderland disposed of large consignments of rams from the well- known flocks of Messrs. James and Embrey, Much Birch; Mr. T. Pearce, of Snod-hill ; Mr. A. Davif, Dorston-court 338 THE FARMBE'S MAGAZINE. &c., the former of which changed hands at from 5| to 12^ guineas, averaging £8 2s. 6d. The Snod-hill rams went from 4:^ to 10^ guineas, averaging £6 12s. The Dorston-court rams averaged £5 7s. 6d., and a few other small lots were sold at satisfactory prices. MR. J. H. VESSEY'S LINCOLNS.— At Halton Holegate there was a large attendance of buyers, several being from the antipodes, and the competition was very keen, especially between two gentlemen from New Zealand. One ram fetched the extraordinary figure of 200 gs., another 175, one 125, and one 110. There were 70 lots sold, and the total sum realised amounted to 2,450 gs., the average price of each sheep being 35 gs. MR. RIGDEN'S SOUTHDOWNS.— The Hove Elock sale took place at Mr. Rigden's new residence in Goldstone Bottom. There was a large attendance of flockmasters from different parts of the country. 100 ewes and 27 rams were offered by Blr. E. Drawbridge, of Lindfield. The ewes were put up in lots of five each, 75 being full-mouthed and 25 shearlings. Mr. Clark, the Duke of Richmond's agent, secured five at six guineas each ; the nest lot at the same price to Mr. field, the agent of the Duke of Portland. The thirdj^lot realised five guineas, and was bought by Mr. E. Cane, of Berwick ; and the remainder of the full-mouthed ewes fetched prices varying from £2 IDs. to £3 15s., the purchasers being the Duke of Portland, Mr. Kelsey, Mr. Smith (Paddockhurst), Mr. Dudney, Mr. Bolting, Mr. Gorringe, and Mr. Phillips. The prices of the shearlings ranged from £3 to 5j guineas ; and four out of the five pens offered were bought by Sir Curtis Lampson, of Worth, Mr. Sharp being the purchaser of the other lot at £3 5s. per head. Ten rams were then offered for hire, but, notwithstanding the competition was keen at limes, the prices obtained were not so great as at some of Mr. Rigden's sales in past years. The highest figure reached was 83 gs., at which sum Mr. Carew- Gibson obtained the services of the one-year-old animal that carried off the first prizes at Bristol and at Bedford ; the nest highest (potation being 50 gs., given by Mr. Greviile, M.P., for a one-year-3ld,'which received high commendation at those two shows. Mr. Hart, of Beddingham, gave 42 gs. for the ram (two years old) which carried off the first prize at Cardiff and second at Bedford ; and the Duke of Portland possessed him- self of the one-year-old which obtained second prize at Bristol, giving 41 gs. for it. The prices given for the others ranged from 12 gs. to 26 gs., and were hired, three by the Duke of Portland, one by Mr. More .Stevens, one by Mous. Nouette Delorme, and the other by Mr. Oldacre. The rams for sale — seventeen in number, all (with one exception) being one-year- olds — were then put up and realised various prices, the lowest being 10 and the highest 46 gs. ; M. Delorme being the purchaser of the animal last alluded to. He also secured two others at 31 and 34 gs. The other purchasers were the Duke of Beaufort (two), Mr. Carew-Gibson, Mr. Hart, Mr. Thorn- hill (t«o), Mr. Wodehouse, Mr. More-Stevens (two), Mr. Raikes, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Hempson, Mr. Wilson, Mr. Ellis, and Mr. J. Uodson. MR. KIRKHAM'S LONGWOOLS.— At the luncheon which preceded the sale a testimonial portrait of Mr. Kirkhaiii was presented by Colonel Amcotts who pre- sided on the part of the subscribers. Seventy shearlings were subsequently offered by Mr. Briggs ; one of which went to Messrs. iJadding at 200 gs. ; another to Mr. Clark of Scop- wicke for 175 gs. ; while Mr. E. J. Davy gave 68 gs. for a sheep ; the Rev. T. O'Grady, 62 gs. ; Mr. J. R. Kirkham, 62 gs. ; Mr. Needliara, 50 gs. ; Mr. Buchanan, of New Zealand, 75 gs. for No. 61 ; Mr. Jones, 42 gs. for No. 19 ; Mr. E. Howard, 30 gs. for No. 62. The total amount was £3,2'J1, or an average of £32 14s. lid. THE SELSEY SOUTHDOWNS.— A number of rams and ewos from Mr. Hugh H. Penfold's flock have lately been sold. Twenty-four rams were offered for letting, but the first, which took the first prize for ram lambs at Southampton last year, did not sell. Eoiir yearlings, from the blood of Mr. T. Ellman's No. 14, were then knocked down to Mr. E. Hob- gen (Sidlesham), 64gs.; Mr. G. Penfold (Wiggonholt), 7gs.; Mr. S. Seward (Petersfield), 2'dhgs. ; and Mr. Tribe (Palmer, Lewes), 11 gs. The remainder of the yearlings were from Lord Walsingham's blood, and were taken by Mr. G. Duke (Blake- hurst) at 3 gs. ; Mr. Tribe, 7 gs. ; Mr. G. Penfold, 5^ gs. and 8gs.; Mr. R. Drewett (Peppering), 13|gs. ; Mr. W. Woods (Craw's Hall), 21ig8. ; Mr, E. Herring'ton (Pagham), 8igs.; and Mr. T. Saxby (Firle, Lewes), 15 gs. Three two-year- olds from the same blood were taken by Mr. G. Duke, 13^ gs. ; Mr. P. Ellis (Clayton Court), 9|gs.; and Mr. C. Hobgen (Shripney), 165^ gs. Pour two-year-olds, from Mr. Ellman's blood, Mr. E. B. Green (Stoughton), 5igs. ; Mr. G. Boni- face (Ford), 10 gs. ; Mr. S. V. Clarke (Kingston), 13 gs. ; and Mr. G. Duke, II2 gs. Two three-year-olds from Mr. Hart's No. 5, Mr. G. Blaker (Pangdean), 15|gs.; and Mr. G. B. Green, 6| gs. The rams for sale did not fetch high prices, and the ewes went cheap ; 5| gs. was the highest price for a ram, and 60 full-mouthed ewes were disposed of at from 44s. THE HAGLEY SHROPSHIRES.— This sale was held on August 3, and some animals from the flocks of Messrs. Webb, Kinver Hill ; J. Harward, Winterfold ; W. F. Firmstone, Hagley ; and W. Yates, Grindle, were put up to competition. Mr. Hayward's highest price realised £7 17s. 6d. The Kinver Hill flock averaged a little over £8, the highest price being £11 lis. Of the eleven shearlings of Mr. Firmstone only six were sold, the best price being £6 16s. 6d. Mr. Yates' seven shear- lings s.veraged £8 15s., the highest price being £15 15s. MR. ROBINSON'S LINCOLNS.— At Huttoft, by Messrs. Mason and Sons. — The number offered was sixty-five, thirty- six of which were shearlings. Of these, No. 20 was hired by Mr. J. Byron, for £53 10s., No. 14 by Mr. W. Chatterton, for £42, and No. 10 by Mr. G. A. Oliver, for £22 Is. Mr. S. R. Kemp took the highest priced aged sheep. No. 52, for £31 10s. Mr. Chatterton took the second, No. 56, for ^£25 4s., and Mr. J. W. Parker the third. No. 54, for £21. Tlie total amount realised by the letting was £879 1 8s , giving an average of about £13 1 Is. THE OWERSBY RAMS. — Mr. Calthrop offered for sale 80 longwool shearling rams belonging to the representatives of the late Mr. John Davy; 79 of the 80 lots were speedily disposed of. There was considerable com- petition for No. 5, which was at last knocked down to Mr. Cartwright for £75. The top sheep of the day was No. 13- of which Mr. Havercroft became the purchaser for £100, No. 20, at £30, was knocked down to Sir J. D. Astley, Bart., M.P. The total sum realised was £1,567 13s., the average being £19 16s. lOJd. THE AYLESBY RAMS.— A select company assembled at Aylesby Manor, to view the show rams bred by Mr. Torr. There were about 40 pure-bred Leicesters ex- hibited, and of these 28 were let at an average of £17 15s. One of the rams was sold to a gentleman from New Zealand for £100. THE GIVENDALE RAMS. — At the annual letting of these Leicesters, Mr. Boulton, of Malton, was the auctioneer. No. 1 shearling was let to Mr. Jordan, of Eastborne, for £34. The average was £11 14s. The two- shears averaged over £9. The average of the aged sheep was over £9. MR. CLARE'S SHROPSHIRES.— The business at Twy- cross commenced with Midshipman, a three-shear ram, by Mansion 3rd, falling to the lot of Mr. Bakor, at 13 guineas. Then came a shearling. Captious, which fell to Mr. Savidge, at 11 guineas. The Leicestershire prize sheep was bought by Mr. Peerman at 13 guineas ; whilst the commended sheep made 20 guineas to Mr. Coxon ; and another realised 22 gs. to Earl Howe. Other rams ranged Irom 18 guineas to five- and-a-half guineas. The ewes made a fair average for the season. The sale was conducted by Messrs. Davenport, German, and Allen, of Ashby-de-la-Zouch. HEREFORD SALES. — Messrs. Pye and Sunderland's sales included upwards of 50 high-class rams, con- signed by the following eminent breeders, viz: Mr. J. N. Downing's pure Ryelands, 23 in number, tlie competition for which was brisk, were purchased as follows : Lots 1 and 7, Mr. Hall, Ripple, 9 gs. and 14^ gs. ; lot 2, Mr. T. H. Pitt, Freetown, 14 gs. ; lot 3, Mr. Mutlow, 12^ gs. ; lot 4, Mr. Hill, Newend, 7 gs. ; lot 5, Mr. Downes, 7 gs. ; lots 6 and 13, Mr. Wedge, 10 gs. and 7 gs. ; lot 9, Mr. Williams, 7i gs. ; lot 10, Mr. Griffiths, 5^ gs. ; lot 11, Mr. T. Duckliam, 9^ K8. ; lot 12, Mr. B. Galliers, 6 gs. ; lot 14, Mr. Timaeus, 6^ gs. ; lots 16 and 20, Mr. Powell, 6^ gs. each ; lot 17, Mr. Vaughan, 5^ gs. ; lot 19, Mr. Payne, Birch, 7 gs. ; lot 30, Mr. Oakley, 5| gs. ; lot 22, Mr. James, 7 gs. ; lot 23, Mr. Powell, Brecon, 6 gs. ; lot 24, Mr. Vevers, Yarkhill, 5 J gs. The average price realised is 8 gs. Mr. Pulley's Shropshires, 6 of whidi were consigned and readily sold as follows: Lot 1, Mr. T. S. THE FAEMBR'S MAGAZINE. 339 Wathen, Coldbrook, 12 gs. ; 2 and 3, Mr. Williams, Cow- bridge, 7^ gs. and 7 gs. ; 4, Mr. H. T. Taylor, Holmer, 9 gs. ; 5 and 6, Mr. A. Goodwin, Wilmaston, 31 gs. The average price 11 gs. Mr. J. Waddell, Canon Bridge, pure Cotswolds, S in number, ranged from 5i gs. to 8 gs., the purchasers being Messrs. Till (Bullingham), Blashill (Bridge), Large (Madley), Daw (Shenmore), Lydiatt (Dinedor), Matthews (Tiberton), and Morgan (Monkton). The average price 6 gs. Several other lots were disposed of at full average prices. PETERBOKOUGH RAM FAIR.— There were 800 sheep penned, being an increase of 302 over last year. The highest pricts realised was £74 8s. for one of the Dunstau Dunstan Pillar flock (Mr. Cartwright's). It vpas purchased by Mr. Davey, who also gave 50 gs. for another out of the same pen. One of the Nocton Heath flock (Mr. Robert Wright's) fetched 58 gs., and another 52 gs. The Pointon Rams (Mr. T. Caswell's) made good prices, ranging from 50 gs. downwards, and the Laughton flock from 53 gs. Several of the latter were purchased for New Zealand. A number of Croston Kerriel rams were let at good sums. The average prices obtained were — The Pointon, 18 gs. ; the Buckminster, 141 gs. ; the Laughton, £18 6s. (id. ; the Kiroy Green, 10 gs. ; Dowsby Hall, 8 gs. ; Wellin- gore, 65^ gs. ; Cranwell, 10 gs., the Mere 13 gs. ; Dunstan Pillar, £18 Us. 6d. ; Mr. Looker's (Hartford, Hunts), £19 ; the Nocton Heath, £18 13s. lOd.; the Branston, 10 gs. SHROPSHIRES AT SHREWSBURY.— The Shropshire Sheep Autumn Sale was held at Shrewsbury. The catalogue contained 349 rams and 2,665 ewes from tlio flocks of many leading breeders, and the attend- ance included buyers for Australia, the European continent, and various parts of the United Kingdom. The demand was good and competition spirited, the whole number being dis- posed of at satisfactory figures, including the following prices : for rams — Mr. Evan's from 84 gs. to 10 gs., Jlr. Mansell's averaged 12 gs,, Mr. Crane's averaged 18 gs., Lord Chesham's 30 gs., Mr. Thomas Tanner's 10 gs., Mr. Marson's 10 gs., Mr. Edwards' 16gs.,Mr.Yate3' 7 gs.,Mr. W.O.Foster's 11 gs.,Mr.J.K. Fowler's 15 gs., Mr. Keeling's 11 gs.. Colonel Dyott's, 9j gs., Messrs. Fenn and Harding's 9 gs., Mr. Horton's 8 gs., Mr. Tanner's from 15 gs. to 7 gs., the Hon E.Kenyon's 15 gs. to 9 gs., Mr. J.B. Jones averaged 10 gs.,Mr. J. W. Ninton's 15 gs., Mr. M. Williams' 9 gs., Mr. Andrews' 12 gs., Messrs. J. and G. Crane 7 gs., Mr. Bache 7 gs., Messrs. Ibbs 5 gs., Mr. J. Horton 7 gs., Mr. Nock 7i gs., Messrs. Wheeler and others 7 gs. The price of ewes ranged from 180s. to 55s., Mr. Foster's average being 3 gs., Mr. Andrews' 3 gs., Mr. Ninton's SJ gs., Mr. Tanner's £5, Mr. W. G. Preece's £5 2s.6d., Mr. Bache'sGOs., Mr. Horton's 63s., Mr.Barber's £5 7s. 6(l.,Mr. Lloyd's 63s., Mrs. Smith's 80s., Mr. Fowler's £4 15s., Mr. R. Everall's 60s., Mr. Nevett's £4 2s. 6d.,Mr. J. Lee's £4 10s.,and others from good flocks from 75s. to 55s. each. Mr. W. 6. Preece of course conducted the sale. SHROPSHIRES IN IRELAND.— The annual sale of Shropshire rams, belonging to Mr. J. L. Naper, took place at Loughcrew. Mr. Preece auctioneer. 39 shearling Shrop- shire rams were sold at prices ranging up to £48 6s., paid by Mr. R. G. Cosby for a first prize ram ; his highly commended ram having brought £25 4s. The average of the Shropshire shearling rams was £11 7s. The shearling ewes sold at prices ranging from 42s. to 60s., and stock ewes from 47s. to 71s. Ten shearling Ijcicester rams realised from £5 5s. to £12 12s., and Lambs up to 38s. COL. LANE'S SHROPSHIRES, at the Echills Farm, Kins's Bromley. The rams sold at prices varying from 6gs. to 24gs, twenty averaging £9 16s. 4d., exclusive of a shear- ling, which was let for the season at llOgs. The ewes found customers at prices from 453. to 81s. per head. Messrs. Wintertou and Beale conducted tl>e sale. MR. BAICER'S SALE, at Moor Barns, near Athcrstone, by Messrs. Lythall and Clarke. The first lot, a three-shear ram, was disposed of for 28gs. Another fetched 18gs. several 16gs., 15g3., 14gs., and smaller sums ; the average being nearly lOgs. The ewes did not sell so well as usual, b;it tlie first lot of five prize shearliugs were sold for 5^gs. each, and others realised fro.m 56s. to 87s. each. MISS ROSE'S SHROPSHIRES.— This sale took place at MuUaghmore, County Mouaghan. Tiie sale int-Iuded over 200 Shropshire rams, ewes, and lambs ; 70 Leicester rams and ewes, 17 pure Devon heifers, 16 Devon and cross-bred bullocks, with the following prices : Shrop- shire rams 35 guineas to 8 guineas, ditto ewes 120s. to 60a. ditto lambs 50s. to 30s., Leicester rams 16 guineas to 6 guineas, ditto ewes 80s. to 50s., Devon heifers 45 guineas to 18 guineas, ditto and cross-bred bullocks (yearlings) about £13 a head. Mr. W. G. Preece, of Shrewsbury, conducted the' LITTYWOOD SHROPSHIRES. — Mr. Charles Byrd's sale and letting took place at Littywood Farm, near Stafford, when 31 rams and 100 ewes were disposed of by Mr. W. G. Preece. The rams realised from 25 to 10 guineas, and the 100 ewes averaged about £4. MR. TURNER'S LONQWOOLS.— At Ulceby Grange, by Mr. Calthrop. The sheep, 60 in number, were offered, 49 sold, and 11 were withdrawn. The average was £12 9s. 4d. on the number sold. The plum of the flock was bought by Mr. Brady Nicholson, Stourton Grange, near Leeds, for £40. MR. HAVERCROFT'S LINCOLNSHIRE LONG- WOOLS. — The Wootton Dale flock was sold on Friday week, by Mr. Calthrop, at Wootton Dale, Bartou-on-Humber. The 60 rams were sold at an average of over £16 per head. CADEBY RAMS.— The sale of this first and direct branch of the Biscathorpe flock took place at the residence of Mr. J. W. Kirkham, at Cadeby. Forty shearlings were offered for sale, and the whole were sold. The lot realised £737 12s. 6d., the average being about £18 9s. The following are the particulars : Messrs. Brigg £12 12s., Young £36 15s., Needham £44 2s., Stokes £14 14s., Skipworth £23 2s., Parr £24 3s., Sharp £31 10s., Mackinder £16 18s., Hewson £16 16s., Hodgson £13 13s., Dawber £13 13s., Bennett ^'14 14s., Boyntou £50 8s., D. G. Briggs £16 16s., Bennett £10 10s., Sharp £10 10s., Morley £13 2s., W. Wright £18 18s., Hodgson £10 10s., Calvert £16 16s., Parr £29 3s., Law £31 10s., Casswell £U 14s., Sharp £10 10s., Needham £18 73. 6d., Twidale £14 3s. 6d., Weightraan £12 12s., Godfrey £10 10s., Swift £9 93., Barker £10 lOs., West- moreland £10 10s., R. Houlden £9 9s., Morley £9 9s.,0dhng £13 13s., Sharp £27 6d., Chapman £7 17s. 6d., Hundleby £7 7s.,Halliday£12 12s., Chapman £9 93., Calvert £14 3s, 6d. LOUTH SEPTEMBER RAM FAIR. — This fair was held in The Quarry. Mr. John J. Clark's Welton-le- Wold flock of 30 long-wooUed rams realised an average of not quite 12 guineas. The plum of the flock made 35 guineas. The iluttoft Grange sheep, the property of Mr. John Louth, Needham, realised an average of nearly 15 guineas, Mr. John Walisby, Kirkham, giving 40 guineas for the plum of the flock. Several others sold at high figures for New Zealand. MR. CARPENTER'S HAMPSHIRES.— Messrs. Waters, Son, and Rawlence, of Salisbury, sold by auction at Lake Farm, the stock of Mr, Joseph Carpenter, The two-teeth ewes ranged from 110s. (Mr. Newton), down to 54s. per head, at which latter figure, however, only one lot was sold, Mr, Brine, of Gussage, was a purchaser at 71s. The four-teeth ewes from 55s. to 100s. (Mr. Dibben), The six- teeth ewes made from 55s. to 83s. (Mr. Dibben), The ram lambs fetched from 4gs. to lOgs., and one four-teeth ram realised 21gs. The highest price obtained for chilver lambs was 63s., the lowest 34s, ; the general run being from 36s. to 48s. The cart horses, of which there were twelve, realised satisfactory prices. A chesnut mare in foal fell to Mr. Read ;it 75gs. ; Mr. Blake gave 70gs. for a black mare iu foal ; and Mr. Pinkney was the purchaser of a chesnut iiorse at 74gs. The lowest price 29gs, Two foals fetched 26gs. and 16gs, MR. GALPIN'S HAMPSHIRES— At Little Laugford, by Messrs. Waters, Son, and Rawlence. The sale com- iiieiiced with the two-teeth ewes, which reached an average of o6s. 6d. per head, the principal pens falling to Mr. J. Read at 75s., Mr. Newton at 70s., Mr. J. Friend at 66s., Mr. F, Moore at 65s., Mr. Smith at 62s., Mr. Blake at 61s., 58s., 57s,, and 55s., and JNIr. Andrews at 60s., 5is., and 49s. The four-teeth ewes brought an average of 54s. 6d. each, the chief purchasers being Mr. J. Friend at 64s., Mr. Blake at 64s., Mr. Taunton at 593., Mr. Tabor at 58s., Mr. Torey at 56s., Mr. Hart at 55s., 54s., and 47s., Mr. Rawlins at 54s., Mr, Andrew at 55s., Mr. Read at 53s, and Mr. Hinxman at 50s. The average of the six-teeth ewes was 58i>. 3d., the highest lots being secured Mr. Newon at 81s., Mr. Andrews at 70s., 57s., 54s., and 53s., Mr. 1. Moor at 72s, Mr, W. Flower at 66s. and 62s., Mr. T. Parham at 62s., Mr. Blake at 61s., Mr. Torey at 61s. and Mr, Humby at 60s. The full-mouthed ewes averaged 48s. 6d., and the Chilver lambs 39s. 340 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. CAPT. TAYLOR'S DEVONS AND SOUTHDOWNS.— The first periodical sale of pedigree Devons and Soutlidowns, from the established herd and flock of Captain Taylor, took place at Priesthaws, Westham ; Mr. Thornton the auctioneer. Ewes ranged from 40s. to 80s., the rams from 5gs. to 21gs., and the Devon cows and heifers from 15gs. to 28gs. The young hulls sold at 22gs. and 19gs. respectively. SOUTHDOWN SHEEP AND SUSSEX CATTLE AT SANDGATE. — This annual sale took place at Sand- gate, on the estate of Mr. G. C. Carew-Gibson. Twenty )"ots of ten full-mouthed Southdown ewes sold at from 38s. to 65s. a head. Mr. Dotting bought at 65s., Mr. Plummer (Bol- ney) at 55s., Mr. Dendy (Cuckfield) at 42s., Mr. E. Tomkins at 42s., Mr. J. Tomkins at 40s. (three lots), Mr. Hide (Ang- mering) at 40s. (four lots) and 38s., Mr. Marsh at 40s., Mr. Page (Perching) at 40s., Mr. Friend Duke at 40s. (three lots) and 3Ss., and Mr. Sharp and Mr. Howell at 38s. Two lots of ten two-tooth ewes were bought by Mr. Hylton (Upper Deed- ing) at 52s., and by Mr. Knight at 48s. Two lots of broken- mouthed ewes sold at 32s. and 36s., Mr. Howell being the purchaser- Twelve rams were offered for letting, but there was no demand. Mr. Humphrey (Ashinglon) hired two at 10 gs. each — No. 2, a four-tooth, by Lord Walsingham's sheep, by Manchester Reserve, and No. 6, a shearling, by Mr. Rig- den's sheep, which took second prize at Dorchester, Cardiff, Plymouth, and Hull. There were 23 rams for sale, which found purchasers at from 17 gs. down to 9 gs. A Sussex bull made 37 gs., and 20 Sussex heifers went at prices ranging from 27 gs. to 13 gs. THE BLENHEIM STOCK SALE.— The sale of live and dead stock, on the Park and Home Farms, which are now let, comprising 1,636 sheep, 90 head of Shorthorn cattle, 64 choice Scotch oxen and heifers, 20 horses and colts, 37 pure-bred Berkshire pigs, and a large and general assortment of agricul- tural implements. The attendance was very numerous, up- wards of 5,000 persons being present. Messrs. Paxton and Castle were the auctioneers, and the sum realised over £8,000. MR. GAMBLE'S SHORTHORNS, BY ]\Ul. WETHERELL. — A portion of Mr. Gamble's herd of Shorthorns was sold at Shouldhamthorpe, Downham, Norfolk. The summer drought affected that part of the country perhaps, more seriously than any other, and told greatly against the condition of the stock ; and the absence of any of the Prudence tribe, one of the best of the late Lord Spencer's families, went against the prices, which were generally low. Lot 1, Florest and calf, brought 35 gs. ; lot 6, Coral, made 54 gs., and Lady Agony 42 gs. : the others, rising from 20 gs., went up to 33 gs. A young bull, Quid Coral, made 35 gs., but there was no great demand for them. Mr. Brackenbury sold twenty -two head at the same time, which were quite a nice selection, the animals beiug well-shaped, with good countenance, and several fit to ex- hibit. They had been principally bred from Mr. Gamble's bulls, for nearly 40 years. A three-year-old heifer ^went as high as 110 gs. ; others made 55 gs., 52 gs., 43 gs., and downwards. The twenty-two head sold realised £929 5s SHORTHORNS BY LYTHALL AND CLARKE AT THE MIDLAND COUNTIES REPOSITORY, BIRMINGHAM. — These were from the herds of Messrs. Holbeck, Baruett, Pulley, Upson, Wliitehouse, G. Game, and J. Beckford. The catalogue contained 31 cows and heifers, and 15 bulls. The following are the better prices : Lot 1, Lady Stuart, 53 gs. (G. Garnc) ; lot 4, Hellenor, 35gs. (Robotham) ; lot G, Ammonia, 80 gs. (Beunior) ; lot 7, Lady, Nore Burdett, 52 gs. (Bradburn) ; lot 13, Helen 30 gs. (Brad- burn) ; lot 14, Miss Moseley, 38s. ; lot 22, Maria Stuart. 46 gs. (G. Game) ; lot 28, Quality Fogg, 25 gs. (Upson) The bulls made rather lower figures. MR. C. TIMMIS' SHROPSHIRES.— At the Brick House, Stafford, by Mr. B. Lytiiam, about 30 shearling and 3 older rams, and 100 ewes. Lord Lichfield took the best, a three- shear ram, at 18 gs., and the average of the rams was close upon 11 gs., while the ewes ranged from 45s. to 92s., re- sulting in an average of nearly 60s. per head. SHROPSHIRES IN BINGLEY HALL, BIRMING- HAM, on Thursday, September 17th, by Messrs. Lythall and Clarke.— Mr. E. Lythall's average was 11 gs., Mr. T. Nock's 13 gs., Lord Wenlock's 12 gs. One of Mr. Joseph Pulley's rams, a two-shear, made 27 gs., and a shearling 20 gs. Mr. T. Jowitt's made 26 gs., Earl of Zetland's average was 11 gs. ; Mr. Harcourt Griffin's average 13 gs., a two-shear making 43 gs. ; Mr. T. J. Mansell's average was 9 gs. Ewes : Mr. Tidy averaged 80s., Mr. B. Long averaged 63s., Mr. E. Jenkins 50s. to 57s., Mr. T. Watson 49s. to 53s., five young stock ewes from Mr. T. Wood, of Grendon, made 168s. MR. GORRINGE'S SOUTHDOWNS AT KINGSTON- ON-SEA, SUSSEX, BY MR. THORNTON.— The shearling ewes were first offered, and sold at an average of about 55s. Mr. Rigdeu, Mr. Taylor (Glenbeigh), Mr. Steyning Beard, Mr. Bushby, Mr. F. D. Carew Gibson, Mr. Wemyss, were among the buyers. The 90 two-shear ewes topped the average with not quite 3 gs., and fifty of these go to Mons. Barthes, France. The 100 three-shear just exceeded the average of the shearlings,theRev. J.Goring, Mr. Cane, Mr. Humphrey, and Mr. Biel taking several pens. In the old ewes were some of the best sold, but a few pens going to the butcher reduced the average to 48s. The rams were principally shearlings, and three of these were put up for letting, and two of them taken, Mr. Steyning Beard one at 16 gs., and Messrs. Page, Essex, the other at 10 gs., while Mr. Verrall gave 15 gs. for another. The others ranged from 5 to 16J gs. ; the 29 aver- agine £11 4s. The sale realised a total of about £1,640. LONG-WOOLLED RAMS IN EAST YORKSHIRE.— The flock of long-woolled Lincoln rams, the property of Mr. Richard Stephenson, of HoUym, were sold by auction at the Royal Station Hotel Yard, Hull, by Mr. C. B. Stamford, at an average of £8 — one half from last year. Mr. Park sold tlie Ulrorae Grange rams, the property of Mr. Boynton, Bridlington, at the same time. The average was £7 10s. RAMS AT ROTHBURY.— On Thursday, Sept. 17, by Messrs. S. Donkin and Son, nearly four hundred Border Leicesters, shearling rams, half-bred, and Cheviot rams and tup lambs, from tlie flocks of breeders in the district, were brought to the hammer, and the whole were sold — upwards of 370 lots, nearly all the rams being sold singly — in four hours and seventeen minutes. The financial business was very ably managed by Mr. James Hope, of Feiton. The following is a summary of the sale : Messrs. Morrison, average £3 8s. 9d. ; S. Langdale, average £3 13s. lOjd. ; Thompson, average £3 Is. 9jd. ; Cairns, average £6 2s. 72d. ; Davidson, average £3 18s. 3d.; E. Allen, average £3 5s. lOd. ; Mrs. Readheard, average £4 4s. lOd. ; Messrs. Sproat, average £2 17s. 6d. ; Shotton, average £3 15s. 84d. ; Hogg, average £4 7s. 75d. ; Hills, average £5 Ss. 3jd. ; Common, average £3 4s. 4^id. ; Sir W. G. Armstrong, average £3 lOs. 6id. ; Messrs. I. Lang- dale, average £5 17s. S^d. ; T. Allan, average £5 Is. 5d. ; Dickman, average £9 3s. 3d. ; Angus, average £3 19s. B^i.; Trevelyan, average £4 17s. 9id. ; Linn, average £3 3s. 4d. ; Forster, £3 4s. 6^d. ; Dixon, average £6 Os. lOd. ; Bosanquet, average £6 10s. 6d. ; J. Forster, average £3 6s.; Wealleans, average £3 63. 8d. ; Donkin, average £1 14s. , Riddell, average £1 Is. 6d.— total £1,648 188. 61I. EVESHAM RAM FAIR. — The supply of rams was rather in excess of the demand. Messrs. Smith and Righton sold a number of Shropshire Down rams from the flock of Mr. RandeU, which averaged about eight guineas, the highest figure reached for a two-shear ram being sixteen guineas. Cotswolds were in force, and those of Mr. Walker, of Compton Abdale, averaged nearly twelve guineas. They were sold by Messrs. Acock and Hanks, of Stow-on-the-Wold. The Cotswolds of Mr. Fletcher, of Shipton, made an average of about eight guineas. The other auctioneers who disposed of rams were Mr. Villa, of Cheltenham, and Mr. Keck, of Shipton-under-Wychwood. Fat stock was scarce, and the trade was improved, beef making S,^'!. to 9d., and mutton about the same. THE LATE MRS. GUY'S SOUTHDOWNS AT HAM- SEY, by Mr. 11. Morris, of Lewes and Hailsham. Ewes averaged nearly 498., and lambs were also sold at good a figure, the leading buyers being Mr. S. Leigh, Mr. C. Ellis, Mr. W. H. Taylor, Mr. Turner, Mr. Mills, Mr. Killick, Ox- ted, &c. The following is a summary of the sale of sheep and lambs : Five full-mouthed ewes by Emery rams 43s., five 41s., ten 40s., ten 42s., ten 42s., ten 42s., ten 383., ten 39s., ten 41s., ten SSs., ten 41s., ten 41s., ten 398., ten 408., five £3s., five 523., five 54s., ten 47s., ten 48s., ten 51s., ten 508., ten 56s., ten 55s., ten 50s., ten 528., ten 49s., ten 50s., ten 50s., ten 48s„ ten 48s., ten 50s.,jtwelve 48s. Five four-tooth ewes by Emery rams, and rams bred by Mr. EUis, of Beddingham by an Ellman ram, 58s., five 61s., ten 60s., ten 50s., ten 55s. THE FARMER'^ MAGAZINE. $41 ten 'I'Qs., ten 50s., teu 52s., ten 483., ten 50s., ten 50.s., teu 49s., ten 51s., ten 46s., ten 47s., ten 49s., ten 49s. I'ive two- toot li by Ellis rams, by an Ellraan ram, 55s., five 57s., ten 51s., ten 543., ten 56s., ten 51s., ten 48s., ten 54s., tea 533., ten 50s., ten 50s., ten 52s., ten Sis., ten 51s., teu 52s., ten 53s., ten 50s., ten 48s. Ten Soutbdown lambs 34s., ten 27s., ten 32g., ten 34s., ten 33s., ten 31s., ten 27s., ten 32s., ten 34s., ton 33s., ten 31s., ten 27s., ten 33s., ten 39s., ten 26s., twenty 29s., twenty 29s. twenty 28s., twenty 263. Eleven rams, four full-raoutbed, five six-tooths, and two two-tootbs, fetched respectively 57s., 50s., 95s., 60s., 533. 6d., 110s,, 6^ ss., 80s.. 110s., 65s., and 35s. PARTNEY GREA.T SHEEP FAIR.— There was a large number of sheep in the fair on Friday. Ewes made from £17 to £30 each. Messrs. Mason and Son sold by auc- tion the Huttoft Grange rams, the property of Mr. John Louth, Needham, at an average of over £13. No. 6 was sold to Mr. Bond, of Toynton for 28 gs., who afterwards refused 40 es. for the same ram to go to Australia. Mr. Hesseltine, of Barton, secured No. 8 for 18 gs. Mr. E. J. Davy, of Tath • well, got No. 20 for the like figure. The flock of Mr. H. F. Kemp, Thurlby Grange, Alford, 44 in number, was then, offered. Mr. Little, of Blyborough, secured No. 4 for 30 gs.. No. 8 18 gs., No. 9 15 gs., No. 10 31 gs., No. 14 12 gs., No. 21 14 gs. Mr. Williams, of Ashby-cum-Tenby, obtained No 12 for 20 gs., and No 17 for 18 gs. Mr. Clark, of Sales by' bought No. 23 for 19 gs. Mr. Wells, of Withern, No. 27 for 15 gs., and No. 33 for 16 gs. THE RAM FAIR AT LINCOLN.— Mr. T. I?. Ricliard- son, auctioneer, Lincoln, sold for Messrs. C. Lister, of Culeby ; C. M. Ward, of Washiogboro' ; aud J. R. E;iland, of Ais- thorpe, with the following result: Mr. Lister's : Lot 1, Mr. F. Codd, 5^gs. ; 2, Mr. C. Adams, 5igs. ; 3, Mr. Searson, 5Jgs. ; 4, Mr. Pickworth, 7gs. ; 5, Mr. Pickworth, 7 gs. ; 6, Mr. Taylor, 5 gs. ; 7, Mr. Searson, o| gs. ; 8, Mr. Taylor, 13^ gs. ; 9, Mr. S. Steeper, B^gs. ; 10, Mr. Ripon, 6^- gs. ; 11, Mr. Wright, 8 gs. ; 12, Mr. Wray, U^ gs. ; 13, Mr. Gaunt, 7 gs. ; 14, Mr. Challens, 5^ gs. ; 15, Mr. Ripon, 11| gs. ; 16, Mr. Tunnard, 5^ gs. ; 17, Mr. Hales, 5igs. ; 18. Mr. Tinley, 5igs. ; 19, Mr. Picker, 11 gs. Mr. C. Ward's: Lot 1, Mr. W. Dixon, 7^ gs. ; 2, Mr. Godfrey, 5^ gs. ; 3, Mr. Cart- wright, 5^ss. ; 4, Mr. SwBn,6i gs. ; 5, Mr. B. Codd, 6^ gs. ; 6, Mr. E. Griffin, 94 gs, ; 7, Mr. F. Mawer, 6^ gs. ; 8, Mr. Lake, 5| gs. : 9, Mr. Pickwell, 6| gs. ; 10, Mr. Mawer, 7 gs. ; 11, Mr. J. M. Sra-'th, 4^ gs. ; 12, Mr. Godfrey, 5 gs. ; 13, Mr. Dear, 6^ gs. ; 14, Mr. Dear, 5 gs. ; 15, Mr. Hurd, 5 gs. ; 16, Mr. Dixon, 12 gs. Mr. J. R. Baland's : Lot 1, Mr. Houldershaw, S^gs,; 2, Mr, Swift, 54gs.; 3, Mr. Maud, 6 gs. ; 4, Mr. J. Coupland, 7i gs. ; 5, Mr. Buxton, 21 gs. ; 6, Mr. Harding, 6^ gs. ; 7, Mr. B. Codd, 6^ gs. ; 8, Mr. Smith, Hi gs. ; 9, Mr. Mawer, 5^ gs. ; 10, Mr. Curtis, Sk gs. ; 11, Mr. Sleightholme, 6J gs. ; 12, Mr. Sleightholrae, 6^ gs. ; 13, Mr. Clarke, 7 gs. Mr. E. Bailey sold 30 of Mr. Morley's, of Leadenham, the prices realised running from 5|gs. to 14 gs. each. Messrs. Briggs and Son offered 50 shearlings bred by Mr. Paddison, of lugleby. Mr. C. F. Paddison gave 31 gs. for one, Mr. Wright 28 gs., and Mr. R. Howard and Mr. Evens one each at 20 gs. Tiie whole made £643 13s., or an average of £12 17s. The Messrs. Biiggs also sold for Mr. Arthur Garfit, of Scothorne : Mr. Swann secured one for 21 gs., and Mr. Godson one at 17 gs. The lot, consisting of 21 animals, made a total £216 16s. 6d., or an average of £10 6s. 6d. each. The Branston rams of Mr. Marshall were likewise offered by Messrs. Briggs and Son, and they fetched prices ranging from 6 to 10 gs. A dozen of Mr. Walesby's rams (Ranby) realised from 6 gs. to 13| gs. THEQUARTLY HERD OFDEVONS AND FLOCK OF EXMOORS.— Near fifty years ago Mr. James Quartly, like his father before him, took to the business of farming and cattle-breeding, and tjie whole of the stock has been brought under the auctioneer's hammer at Molland, in the wildest district of North Devon, and almost at the foot of Exmoor. The flock of nearly 300 Exmoor sheep formed the first division of the sale, and the chief purchasers were Messrs. Babbage (Southmolton), Yeo (Swymbridge), Hitch- cock (Southmoiton), and Harris. Of these the largest buyer was Mr. Babbage. There were seventy full-mouthed ewes, in lots of ten each, and these averaged 38s, a head ; 29s. was the lowest, and 55s. the highest price. The eighty three-year-old wethers averaged 51s. each — the prices runuiag from 40s. to 60s. The 110 two-year-old wethers brought in an average of 463. each — the lowest price was 40s. and the highest 573. each. Fourteen remained unsold. There were teu rams, but one of these having damaged his leg, was not offered. The purchasers of the nine v/ere Mr. Lovelace, who gave 15 gs. for a very handsome one ; Messrs. F. Shider (Higlibury), Follett (Dul- verton), Westacott (Dulverton), Tamlin (Windsor), _ C. Burdori (Swymbridge), Stranger, and C. Burrington ; "the average was £9, and the lowest price £4 10s. The total sum realised by the sale of the sheep was £581 13s. There were alto- gether 70 Devons offered ; but the herd seemed hardly to come up to wliat some had expected, and prices were not so high as was anticipated. Topsy, a six-year-old cow, and whose grnndsire was King of the Britons, went to Mr. Tapp, of the arljoining estate of Twitchen, for 29 gs. Of the next best were Dolly Varden, a yearling heifer, whose grandsire was Duke of Flittou IV., and sire, Duke of Devon, and Bertha, a heifer calf, also from the same blood ; the former went to Mr. Azariah Smith, Bradford Peverell, for 25 gs., and five less secured Bertha for Mr. Tapp. All hut two of the cows and heifers were in calf by Butterfly, Baron, or Bismarck, and their prices varied from 16J to 29 gs. Peaceful, adecendant of King of the Britons, out of a pnrcliased dam, fetciied 22 gs., at which price she was taken to Wales by the the Rev. Mr. Morgan, brother of Lord Tredegar. Flora, calved in 1869, whose grandsire was Garibaldi 844, and sire Trio 941, fetched 24^ gs. from Mr. Pitfield, of Bridport, Dorset. Duchess, of the Baronet 7§1 stock, was taken by Mr. Yeo, Swimliridge, for 25 gs. Stately, calved in 1871, and got by a bull of Jlr. Buller's, went to Mr. Pitfield for 20 gs. Pretty- maid, calved in 1871, sire Champion, grandsire Baronet (781), dam Peaceful (3904), became the property of Mr. Jackman, of Hexworthy, Cornwall, for 23 guineas Saunders came with the character of a good breeder, bnt she was knocked down at 17 gs. to Mr. Pitfield. Buttercup, calved in 1873, sire Y'oung Turk, grandsire Young Ensign, went for 20j gs. to Sir. Loveband, Bishopsnympton. Princess and Marchioness, both descended from the same stock, were also noticeable, the former went at 19 gs. to Mr. Norton, of Chulmleigh, and the latter to Mr. Hebditch, of Dorset, for 24| gs. These twenty-nine cows and heifers fetched 579 gs., and averaged about 30 gs. each, 'i'he purchasers were Rev. Mr. Jlorgan, Messrs. Yeo (Swymbridge), Tapp (Twitchen), Pitfield (Bridford), H. Wippell (Alphington), Jackman (Hex- worthy), Zftlley, A. Wood (Utfculme), Norton (Chulmleigh), Hebditch (Dorset), J.Beedeil (Stoodleigh), Tamlin (Windsor), Loveband (Bishopsnympton), W. Shapland (Nortlimolton), and Loosemore (Plyratree). There were but half-a-dozen lieifer yearlings, three of ttiem liad for their grandsires Duke of Edinburgh (833), and two of them Duke of Flittou IV. they brought in 77 gs., and averaged 13 gs. each. The pur ; chasers were Messrs. A. Smith, Norton, Tamlin, and Fether- ston (Wiveliscombe). The heifer-calves numbered thirteen, and in addition to Bertha, already mentioned, the most noticeable were Dora, by a bull of Mr, Passmore's, bought by Mr. Shapland for 9 gs., and Snow, sire Butterfly, grandsire Champion, which was sold to Mr. J. Jlilton. The lot realised 103 gs., giving an average of 8 gs. The thirteen were divided lietween Messrs. Tapp, J. Milton (Wiveliscombe), A. Capel (Wiveliscombe), Timlin, W. Shapland, J. Westcott (Dulverion), and Passmore (Bishopsnympton). The bulls were next brought out. The olders was Butterfly, calved in 1871, sire Champion, grandsire Baronet; he went for 36 gs. to ilr. Hartnoll, Swymbridge. The other bulls were yearlings. Baron by Old England, and Bismarck by Byron ; the first was sold to Mr. Tapp for 23 gs., and Bismarck fetched 25 gs. from Mr. King, of Brompton. The three brought in 74 gs. The three bull-calves were — Pickwick, de- scended from Duke of Flittou IV., llj gs. to Mr. Martin, of Molland ; Young England bought by Mr, Burdon (Swym- bridge) for £13 10s,, and Livingstone fetched 15 gs. from Blr. Tazewell (Bridgwater). The sixteen steers brought £333 10s. ; the lowest price for a pair was 10 gs., and the highest £50 10s. The disposal of these concluded the cattle sale, which realised altogether £1,343 10s. The horses, sixteen in number, were all bred by Mr. Quartly. The top price was for a five-year-old chesnutgeldingup to eighteen stone with the hounds, which was sold to Mr. Bissett, of Anstey, at 85 gs. The total realised by the sale was about £2,300. Mr. Quartly now retires from farming. 342 THE FABMER'S MAGAZINE. FANCY STOCK SALES. Within the last few days there have been two or three more than usually noticeable sales of stock ; thus on Wed- nesday, iu Leicestershire, where the Shorthorn has driven out the Longhorn, there was a sale of Shorthorns, the average for which exceeded anything on record in this country. As much however, had been anticipated, as immediately after the Duke of Devonshire's sale, at Holker, the same average for the females was, as it is said, offered Mr. Cheney and declined. Then, on Friday there occurred in Radnorshire a sale of Here- fords, announced as The Herd of Wonders, and worthy the notice of " the scientific and philanthropic promoters of agricultural progress thoughuut the world." On the same day Mr. Marjoribanks' herd of Anglo- Alder- neys was offered to people about town who have a fancy for " rich dairy qualities ;" w^hile in the previous week the most celebrated breeder of Devous cleared out his reds from the Molland farm, at the very foot of Esmoor. Yet more remarkable is it that none of these diiferent varieties were what is known as show stock. High as he may stand in his own neighbourhood, visitors to the Royal and Western meetings have never heard of Mr. Green as a breeder of Herefords ; while Mr. Quartley has for a long season been content to look on and watch Messrs. Davey and Farthing fight out the battles of the North and Somerset Devons. Mr. Marjoribanks, again, though once famous in the Shorthorn ring, has done little more of late than make his mark with a Jersey steer at a local meeting ; and the owners of high-bred Shorthorns now rarely deign to exhibit. With fashion and fancy run- ning after them, they can afford to be very much above that sort of thing ; whereas the other breeds clearly languish without the incentive of such an advertisement. Mr. Quartley does not show, and his Devons, full of the best blood made merely market prices : heifers and cows of high degree reached, for twenty-nine in number, to an average of barely 20 guineas, and nothing over 30 guineas. But it may be, well though they always stand at our Christmas shows, that the Devons are gradually narrowing their confines and growing out of use. Whereas, the Alderneys, as commonly so distin- guished, are fast growing into repute, alike on and off the show-ground. And yet Mr. Marjoribanks had a very bad fale. Bred of course quite regardless of cost from the stock of Mr. Dauncey, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Duncan, and others, the forty-one cows and heifers, sold on Friday, reached to no better average than 34 gs. ; whilst the four bulls realised amongst them 107 gs., or about "a pony" a-piece. But the Bushey sale of Jerseys spoke to an experiment, and more directly to the failure of that experiment. "The argument" here offered was that Jerseys should carry beef as well as give milk ; and bred altogether from home stock, that is from sire and dam both calved in England, they have under special treatment grown into great coarse animals, sadly wanting many of the fine points of the Jersey, and more properly to be distinguished as the Anglo-Alderney, a whole- coloured or "self-coloured" beast as they call it, more, after the manner of the butcher than the dairy maid. This run, indeed, on greys, duns and fawns, is "fast ap- proaching an absurdity ; and, as we said when at Mr. Dauncey's sale of seven years since, " the preference for a grey herd has nothing further to recommend it than a fancy, for the lemon and white and other parti-coloured cows from the Channel Islands are quite as good milkers as, if anything, they show more style and breeding than their Quaker-coated sisters." In truth, the Horwood greys were inclined to coarseness, but at the sale Mr. Marjoribanks' bailiff gave the top price, 100 gs., for Landscape, a great lengthy cow, and her produce, as tried by Friday's sale, were scarcely worth rearing. There was a two-year out of her called Landlady, which looked more like a Scotch cross than a Jersey, and sold for 33 gs. ; while an elder daughter was worse still, " mere beef," as a connoisseur said turning away in dis- gust, and she went for 28 gs.; two rather better but sadly coarse going at 37 and 40 gs. There were, no question, a few large handsome cows in the cata- logue, which made more money; but the only brisk feature of the sale was for the calves, showing as these did more Jersey character, as so far not developed according to the system adopted at Bushey. But the general business was slow, and so little zest had followed a look through the herd, that one of the early lots was knocked down to Mr. Simpson for 32 gs., having come in from Mr. Duncan a few months back at 87 gs. We draw two or three conclusions from this sale, as we must admit entirely in accordance with our previous opinions : people who go for beef in Jerseys are very likely to go wrong ; there :s little or nothing more to be said for greys and fawns than that this is a mere fancy, and to keep to the true type of the Jersey it will be necessary every now and then to have a fresh cross from the Island. Tried by Bushey, your Anglo-Alderney is often going far away from " the guinea stamp." Properly cultivated, however, there is no reason why the Jersey should not in his degree become as fashionable as the Shorthorn ; although just now "everybody" would look to want one quite as much as the other. At the great Short- horn sales of late it has been the outsider who has done so much to make the average, as, without being invidious, a run through the price-lists will show ; whilst instead of animals dropping to half or a third of their previous price like the Brad well cow at Bushey, they still keep in- creasing in value up to almost any age. Thus, at Underley the other day, Duchess Gwynne, the first lot offered, made at twelve years old 430 gs., having eight years previously been sold at Brampton for 60 gs., and two years subsequently by Mr. Foster for 180 gs. At the same sale Cherry Queen, the highest priced cow at 1,220 gs., goes back to Bolden's Brandy, bought by public auction some twenty years since for 33 gs. At the Holker sale of the same week Musical, sold to Sir Wilfrid Lawson for 360 gs., was purchased just a year since for 71 gs. ; while the Roses of Raby, now the Duke's favourite tribe, are from a cow sold as a calf in 1862 for 76 gs. Oxford 14th was once priced at 20 gs. ; while at Mr. Bates' sale in 1850 ten Oxfords reached to an average of under 59 gs. ; and now gentlemen who are mere beginners at this business take them readily at thousands. But " with so much money about " something must be done with it, as it is not quite clear why Shorthorn cows or thorough-bred yearlings should monopolise all the best business. For much of this, at least in one di- rection, the outsider is answerable ; and, until he comes to frequent the red Devon or white-faced ring, breeders must be content with such prices as they can afford to pay to each other. Still, if the old Duchess Gwynne, like the nails in the horse- shoe, can double her value every time she comes out up to twelve years old, surely a herd possessing so much of the blood of Governess, who bredupto twenty-six years old backed by a bull like Zealous, who is useful at half that age, should have made more money than did Mr. Green's Herefords. But the outsider did not open his cheque- book at Knighton, where a large company was composed mainly of men who had been educated in the school, and the sale, though a fairly good one, was not a wonder. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 343 REVIEW OE THE CORN TRADE DURING THE PAST MONTH. The month of September has beeu unusually fine and warm, helping to clear up the arrears of harvest in the late districts and the North, where their condition was becoming doubtful from the frequent previous rain, while every kind of field preparation has been facilitated by the changes in the weather. The autumnal sowings seem to have the promise of a good seed-bed at an early period ; 80 the plants will have a fair chance of establishment before the winter. The season, however, turns out to be one of unusual inequality in prices. Wheat, having the best reputation as to its yield, has suffered, as we think, unreasonably, for we have seen quite enough inferior samples to convince us that many a farmer has gone short ; nor do we think there has been such an abundance as auy where to justify a fall, from this time last year, of 17s. 4d. per qr., as shown by the averages. Why should the public be benefited as much as £2 12s. per annum for every famUy of four at the farmers' expense of 16s. lO^d. per acre, when the previous rates, considering the poor yield, were very moderate — that is, supposing the present not to exceed 363. 8d. per acre ? In some cases it will doubtless be more, but in others less. A rise of 5s. per qr. on the present low average — 47s. 2d. — would only bring it to 52s. 2d. ; that would right the growers, and yet give the public a considerable benefit, and we hope the late undue pressure will give place to what seems so equitable and just. Already a reaction has set in through- out France, and as the same reason for it exists here, we hope farmers to the same extent will succeed, and feel confident that as the season advances prices will find about their level. In Hungary there is a feeling of resistance as well as in France, though they certainly have one million quarters to spare for export, whereas England on the average only grows half its consumption. Germany shows the same disposition to resist. Belgium is reviving from the panic, and though Odessa feels it still, prices there were relatively higher than here, and a reaction was certain. After all, we must wait for more accurate returns to know how as a nation we have fared. But it seems something untoward, in an agriculturist's lot, to be threatened in his labour, screwed in his rent, and pressed by public opinion, for a moderately successful growth in his produce. Such a result would be turning an apparent success into a real disaster. The following were the prices recently quoted at the several places named : W^hite Mayeune wheat at Paris 51s., red ditto 48s. ; white at Bordeaux 50s. ; wheat at Courtrai 50s., at Brussels 50s., at Antwerp 52s., at Liege 50s. 6d., at Maestrecht 50s. ; new at Hambro' 50s. c. f. i., at Stettin 44s. f. o. b., at Cologne for November 44s., at Berlin for October 40s. ; best new at Danzig 50s., red at Odessa 36s., finest red at Budapesth 48s. ; soft white at San Francisco 47s. c. f. i. ; spring red at New York 37s. lOd. per 4801bs. Monday, the 31st August, not being included in last month's review, we call it the 1st of the present month (September). The supply of English Wheat was then moderate, and so were the foreign arrivals. The show of fresh samples on the Essex and Kentish stands was fair, but by no means large. There was therefore no further decline, but the demand was far from active, at the previous Monday's rates. The foreign trade had a more settled appearance, and there was a steady quiet trade at unaltered rates. Cargoes afloat not being numerous, there was no change of value to note. Wheat prices in the country appeared as yet unsettled, but the rates generally realised were about 2s. per qr. higher thau the quotations of London. The only change at Liverpool was a decline of Id. to 2d. per cental on all descriptions of foreign, excepting red spring American. At Edinburgh and Leith values were unaltered, but Glasgow noted a'reduction of Is. perqr. The small business done in wheat at Dublin was at fully former quotations. On the second Monday there was an increased supply of home-growth, and a considerable arrival of foreign, half being from America and some quantity from Australia. But the number of fresh samples from the near counties being limited, a steady trade was noted at the previous currency for all descriptions of fine English new, there being scarcely a sample of old. Danzic and all de- scriptions of foreiga wheat, with the exception of Southern white, were unaltered in value ; the latter being over-plentiful, was Is. per qr. lower. Cargoes afloat not being numerous were unaltered in value. This week the irregularities of the country wheat trade were brought more to a level, some that had not fallen so heavily yielding to necessity, and others rather recover- ing from the depression so generally felt. But Liver- pool, as if rebuking the London decline in white wheat, advanced tor this sort 3d. per cental, with a further rise of 2d. on Friday. Though Edinburgh was steady as to wheat, and Leith firmer, Glasgow again gave way 6d. to Is. per qr. No change was noted at Dublin, either in English or foreign wheat. On the third Monday there was rather less English wheat, and the foreign arrivals fell ofi' to one-third of the previous week. Again the show of fresh samples from Kent and Esses was limited, showing more dissatisfac- tion with London rates. Yet factors did not succeed in obtaining any increase over the previous values, and sales were only slow on those terms. There was, however, a fair foreign demand, especially for good old, at quite the previous currency. Cargoes afloat not being plentiful, prices were fully maintained. The country markets this week were generally steady, but mostly above Lon- don rates, not being so subject to the influence of large foreign arrivals. Liverpool oq Tuesday noted slow sales, and on Friday there was a decline of Id. to 2d. per cental on foreign. Edinburgh and Leith noted no change in wheat, but Glasgow this week recovered, and was Is. dearer. The Dublin trade evinced signs of revival, being firm for both native and foreign qualities. On the fourth Monday, the supply of home-growth was moderate, and that from abroad considerably reduced. The show of fresh samples on the Essex and Kentish stands was larger than of late, though not heavy. Fine qualities went off steadily at the previous Monday's rates, but inferior were difficult to place without some reduc- tion. The foreign trade was quiet, there beiug no dis- position the part of holders to press sales at any less money. Floating cargoes were unaltered in value. The imports into London for four weeks were 28,638 qrs. English, 123,561 qrs. foreign wheat, against 31,130 qrs. English, 188,119 qrs. foreign iu September, 1873. The London exports were 2,897 qrs., against 24,985 qrs. in 1873. The imports into the United Kingdom for four weeks ending 12th September were 3,613,264 cwts. wheat, 258,897 cwts flour, against 3,439,269 cwts wheat, 325,856 cwts. flour in 1873. The London averages goaimenced at 53s. 4d., and closed at 483. 9d. The 344 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. general avcrazc opened at 57s. 3i]. and closed at 47s. 2J., showing a reduction in four weeks of 10s. Id. per qr. The flour trade his been dull and deliiiing ever since 24!th August, when tie top price of Town-made samples was reduced to 47s., Norfolks v ilh dilFieultv bringiug as much as oSs., and low sorfs 32-*. Hurrels have also falleu to 2Gs., extra S^ateat New York being only quoted 21s. 7d., and good flour at Paris to 37s. fid. ])er sacdi. Maize has lately ad vanned 2-;. to 3-i. per qr., not- withstanding liberal supplies, ])rifes Laving previously risen in America, and the crop, being a partial failu'-e at Odessa, lu Hungary, &c., flat American has become worth 353., and round sorts 37s. per qr., but as grindinsr barley has been gradually declining we scarcely think these high rates will last. The imports into London for four weeks were 72,040 qrs., against 58,840 qrs. in 1873. Till the month was well advanced the supplies of new barley were scanty, it being too early for the nialtingc season. French qualities were the first to appear, and brought 3Gs. to 40s., but fell subsequently to about 37s. Our own crop has since been appearing in fair quantities for the time of year, and has brought 44s. to 483. for fine sorts. P^neign arrivals having lately been more liberal in grinding sorts they have been reduced about 2*. in value, such being procurable at 29s. to 33j. Oher pig feed being d"ar we scarcely expect much lower rates. Fine malting .Sialeat Hambro' was quoted as high as 51s., cost, freight, a id insurance. The imports into London for four weeks were 3,424 qrs. British, G6,18'J qr.*. foreign, again.st 1,743 qrs. British, 8,782 qrs. foreign for the same period iu 1873. The malt trade has been very quiet through the mouth, more especially for old qualities, the new being preferred, its future value must of course be determined by the course of fine barley. The oat trade has fluctuated with the supplies. The first market being over-charged with a double quantity rates gave way 6d. to Is. per qr. for sll sorts, but as the quantities, though still good, every week were lessened there was a read ion to a similar extent, excepting on the last Monday, when the abundance about placed the mar- ket 6d. below its starting price. Fresh 361bs. Russian sorts closed worth about 25s. 6<1., 381b3. 28^., and 401bs. 30s., and Swei'es in proportion, but the bulk of the sup- plies has conisted of inferior Russian, and the late long sitting of Parliament greatly kept up the demand. Tiiis grain is, therefore, relatively dear, and we fear the general deficiency of the crop, both here and on the Continent, will keej) it so all through the season. The imports into London for fi.ur weeks were 2,741 qrs. English, 160 qrs. Scotch, 70'l qrs. Irish, 316,737 qrs. foreign, against 2.396 qrs. Englibh, 75 qrs. Irish, 241,203 qrs. foreign in 1873. The bean trade has been rather against buyers all through the month, from the very short stocks in the country and the lightness of the crop, though the quality has turned out very fine. New harrows have become worth 47-3. to 48s., and extra fine old to SGs., 'Egyptian 43s. to 443., Italian and French 45s. I\Iaize may be a check upon any material advance as well as grinding barley, while Rivett wheat at 43s. may be used for feeding as a cheaper substitute. The imports into London for four weeks were 1,292 qrs. English, 7,307 qrs. foreign, against 1,497 qrs. English, 8,927 qrs. foreign in 1873. The stock of old peas being limited and the English supplies hitherto small, this pulse has also rather hardened in value — say to the extent of Is. per qr. There has been a large consumption of old white Canadian as horse food, though as white boilers they have not been in de- mand ; pig-feeding sorts being sent up sparingly have also brought the same advance, duns being worth 448. to 453. ; maples have become quite a fancy article from their scarcity, and whites have readily sold at 46s. Should the next winter be severe and cause a demand for boilers they would of course be susceptible of a further advance. The imports into London for four weeks were 2,424 qrs. Enelish, 6,390 qrs. foreign, against 2,135 qrs. English, 7,790 qrs. foreign 1873." Tiie linseed trade, with modiirate receipts, has been steady and unaltered all through the month. The im- ports were 25,495 against 27,251 qrs. in 1873. In cloverseed but little has been passing, stocks being too limited for speculative purposes, and holders too firm to induce buyers to come forward. Here the crop is considered short, in some parts of France it is reckoned good, but no large transactions have yet taken place, and ])rices were not settled. Winter Tares have been rather more in demand, at 8s. to 9s. per beshel for fine qualities. IMPERIAL AVERAGES For the week ended Sept. 19, 1874. Wheat 72,6241 qrs. 468. 8d. Barley 3B,o28i „ 423. 5d. Oata 5,191| ,, 278. 2d. COMPARATIVE AVERAGES. WHEAT. BARLEY. OATS. Years. Qrs. s. d. Qrs. 8. d. Qrs. 8. d. 1870... 91,81U ... 46 6 21,4111 ... 36 4 4,7491 ... 23 9 1371... 9-i.7t2J ... 57 7 6,856i ... 35 6 2,979J ... 23 6 1872... 63 108i ... 58 9 5,665i ... 37 9 3,036j ... 22 6 187:<... 62,693^ .. 61 7 ll,466i ... 45 1 3,094i ... 27 5 1874... 72,5211 __ 4s g 36,02Si ... 42 5 5,191| ... 27 2 LONDON AVERAGES. Wheat 4,849 qrs. 47s. 6d. Barley 478 „ 438. 6d. Oata — ,, —8. Od. CORN IMPORTED AND EXPORTED For the week ending Sept. 19. Imported into angrd.|8cotrd. Ireland. Expo British. rted. Foreign Wheat Cwts. Cwts. 590199 1 in2.=;o Cwts. 123397 2120 849i4 Cwt.8. 7608 73 75 120 Cwts. 6706 280410 216578 13514 13201 37739 50975 10500 "30 2892 23299 Rye Peaa... Beans Indian Corn Buckwheat 7993 Total 1202996 176971 215731 7876 14701 Wheat Flour Oat Meal 80111 11 2005 91 31231 500 806 239 '"s 2071 Rye Meal Pea Meal Ind'n Com Meal "o Total 82221 1285220 31234 211205 sno 216231 1053 8929 505 2073 Grand Total.. Malt qrs. 16771 CURRENT PRICES OP BRITISH GRAIN AND FLOOR IN MARK LANE. SbUUni^s per Quarter WHBAT.Essex&Kent, white.. .new 45 fine 50 ., ,, red new 43 ,, 46 Norfolk, LinclnBh., and Yorkah., red 42 46 BARLEY 38 to 42, Chevalier 40 48 Grinding 33 35 Distilling 39 42 MALT, pale, new ...73 76 brown .. 66 61 RYE 42 41 OATS, English, feed 20 to 33 Potato — — 8cotch,foed 00 Irish, feed, white 25 Ditto, black 26 BEANS, Mazagan ...43 Harrow 46 PEAS, white, boiler8.45 00 Potato. 30 Fine — — 29 Potato — — 45 Ticks 43 44 50 Pigeon 50 66 48 Maple 45 to 47 Grey 42 44 FLOUR, per Back of 2801b8., best town hoaseholda... 38 47 Beat country households 35 36 Norfolk and Suffolk 30 33 Printed by Watson and Hazell, 265, Strand, London, W.C. THB MARK LANE EXPRESS AND AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL IS TUB LARGEST AND THB LEADING FARMER'S AND GRAZIER'S NEWSPAPER. PUBLISHED EVERY MONDAY EVENING, IN TIME FOR POST. Office of Publication and for Advertisements, 265, Strand, London. May be had of all Booksellers and Newsmen throughout the Kingdom , price Serenpence, or £1 lOs. 4d. oer annum. IMPORTANT TO FLOCKMASTERS. rr 1 HOM AS BIGG, Agricultural and Veterinary _L Chemist, by Appointment to his late Royal Highness The Prince Consort, K.G., Leicester House, Great Dover Street, Borough, London, begs to call the attention of Fai'mers and Graziers to his valuable SHEEP and LAMB DIPPING COMPOSITION, which requires no Boiling, and may be used with Warm or Cold Water, for effectually destroying the Tick, Lice, and all other insects injurious to the Flock, preventing the alarming attacks of Fly and Shab, and cleansing and pui-ifying the Skin, thereby greatly im- proving the Wool, both in quantity and quality, and highly Contributing to the general health of the animal. Prepared only by Thomas Bigg, Chemist, ,&c., at his Manu- factory as above, and sold as loUows, although any other quantity may be had, if required: — i lb. for 20 sheep, price, jar included £0 2 0 61b. 30 „ „ „ 0 3 0 81b. 40 „ „ „ 0 4 0 101b. 60 „ „ „ 0 5 0 20 lb. 100 „ „ (Cask and measure 0 10 0 301b. 150 „ „ included) 0 15 0 401b. 200 „ „ , 10 0 601b. 250 „ ., „ 13 6 601b. 300 „ „ „ 17 6 80 lb. 400 ,. „ 1 17 6 1001b. 500 „ „ 2 5 0 Should any Flockmaster prefer boiling the Composition, it will be equally effective. MOST IMPORTANT CERTIFICATE. From Mr. Heeepath, the celebrated Analytical Chemist :— Bristol Laboratory, Old Park, January 18th, 1861. Sir,— I have submitted your Sheep Dipping Composition to analysis, and find that the ingredients are well blenkied, and the mixture neutral. If it is used according to the directions given, I feel satisfied, that while it effectually destroys vermin, it vnll not injure the hair roots (or " yolk") in the skin, the fleece, or the carcase. I think it deserves the numerous testimonials published. I am. Sir, yours respectfully, William Hbbapath, Sen., F.C.S., &c., &C., To Mr. Thomas Bigg Professor of Chemistry. Leicester House, Great i/over-street, Borough, London. He would also especially call attention to his SPECIFIC, or LOTION, for the SCAB or SHAB, which will be found a certain remedy for eradicating that loathsome and ruinous disorder in Sheep, and which may be safely used in all climates, and at all seasons of the year, and to all descriptions of sheep, even ewes in lamb. Price FIVE SHILLINGS per gallon — sufficient on an average for thirty Sheep (according to the virulence of the disease) j also in wine quart bottles, IMPORTANT TESTIMONIAL. " Scoulton, near Hingham, Norfolk, April 16th, 1855. "Dear Sir, — In answer to yours ot the 4th inst., which would have been replied to before this had I been at home, I have much pleasure in bearing testimony to the efficacy of your invaluable ' Specific for the cure of Scab in Sheep.' The 600 sheep were all dressed in August last with 84 gallons of the ' NoN-PoisoNOUS Specific,* that was so highly recom- mended at the Lincoln Show, and by their own dresser, the best attention being paid to the flock oy my shepherd after dressing according to instructions left ; but notwithstanding the Scab continued getting worse. Being determined to have the Scab cured if possible, I vsrote to you for a supply of your Specific, which I received the following day ; and although the weather was most severe in February during the dressing, your Specific proved itself an invaluable remedy, for in three weeks the Sheep were quite cureil ; and I am happy to say the young lambs are doing remarKably well at present. In conclusion, I believe it to be the safest and best remedy now in use. " I remain, dear Sir, "For JOHN TINGEY, Esq., " To Mr. Thomas Bigg. * "R. RENNBY. UW Flockmasters would be well to beware of such pre- parations as " Non-poisonous Compositions :" it is only necessary to appeal to their good common sense and judg- ment to be thoroughly convinced that no "Non-poisonous" article can poison or destroy insect vermin, particularly such as the Tick, Lice, and Scab Parasites — creatures so tenacious of Ufe. Such advertised preparations must be wholly useless , or they are not what they are represented to be. DIPPING APPARATUS £1*, £5, £i, & £3. bryant&may's MATCHES. LONDON AND COUNTY BANKING COMPANY. ESTABLISHED 1836. SUBSCRIBED CAPITAL... £3,000,000, in 60,000 SHAEES of £50 EACH. PAID-UP CAPITAL... £1,196,880; INSTALMENTS UNPAID, £3,120 (£1,200,000). RESERVE FUND (paid up) ...£598,440; INSTALMENTS UNPAID, £1,560 (£600,000). NATHANIEL ALEXANDER, Esq. T. TYRINGHAM BERNARD, Esq. THOMAS STOCK COWIE, Esq. FREDERICK FRANCIS, Esq. Joint General Managees- chief inspector. W. J. NORFOLK, Esq. DIRECTORS. FREDERICK HARRISON, Esq. WM. CHAMPION JONES, Esq. E. HARBORD LUSHINGTON, Esq JAMES MORLEr, Esq. WILLIAM McKEWAN, Esq. and WHITBREAD TOMSON, Esq, CHIEF ACCOUNTANT. SECRETARY. JAMES GRAY, Esq. GEORGE GOUGH, Esq, WILLIAM NICOL, Esq. A. HODGSON PHILLPOTTS, Esq. JAMES DUNCAN THOMSON, Esq. FREDERICK YOULE, Esq. HEAD OFFICE, 21, LOMBARD STREET. Manaser— WHITBREAD TOMSON, Esq. | Assistant Manager— WILLIAM HOWARD, Esq. THE LONDON AND COUNTY BANK opens— DRAWING ACCOUNTS with Commercial Houses and Private Individuals, either upon the plan usually adopted by rther Bankers, or by charging a small Commission to those persons to whom it may not be convenient to sustain an agreed Permanent Balance. DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS.— Deposit Receipts are issued for sums of Money placed upon these Accoimts, and Interest is allowed for such periods and at such rates as may be agreed upon, reference being had to the state of the Money Market. CIRCULAR NOTES AND LETTERS OP CREDIT are issued, payable in the principal Cities and Towns of the Cob - tincut, in Australia, Canada, India, and China, the United States, and elsewhere. The Agency of Foreign and Country Banks is undertaken. The PcBCHASB and Salb of Government and other Stocks, of English or Foreign Shares effected, and Dividends, Aknditibs, &c , received for Customers of the Bank. Great faciUties are also afforded to the Customers of the Bank for the receipt of Money ftom the Towns where the Com- pany has Branches. The Officers of the Bank are bound not to disclose the transactions of any of its Customers. By Order of the Directors, WM. MoKEWAN, ") Joint Geneial WHITBREAD TOMSON, i Managers. Twenty-seventh Edition. WABREN'S FABMER'S ACCOUNT BOOK. PRICES : Folio, for large farms, Ss. ; quarto, for small farms, and for schools where youths are trained for Agricultural Pursuits, 53. Also, folio, with pages for a weekly instead of a daily account of labour, 78. Royston : John. Warren. London : Simpkin, Marshall, and Co. ; Whittaker and Co. ; Longman and Co. ; Ridgway. i No. 6, Vol. XLVI.] NOVEMBER, 1874. [Third Sbbks. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE, AND MONTHLY JOURNAL OP THE AGEICULTUEAL INTEEEST. Sttrfiattti TO THE FARMERS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM. LONDON : PUBLISHED BYROGERSON AND TUXFORD, 265, STRAND. PRICB TWO SMILLINCS. WATBOK AHD H4y.M.T.,3 [PBIMTKBS, M6. STBA17D. THE FAEMEE'S MAGAZINE. CONTENTS. NOVEMBER, 1874. Plat k.— Q UEEN MARY. Page. Description of Platk ....... 345 The Winter Session ........ 345 The Agriculture of Denmark. - . . . . . . 346 The 12th Clause . . . . . . . .348 Success to Agriculture ....... 349 Prize Farming ........ 350 Auxiliary Foods. — By the Northern Farmer . . . . .351 Highway Legislation ........ 352 Steam Cultivation ........ 359 Steam Ploughing ........ 360 Farming in Wales ........ 361 North Shropshire Agricultural Society : Meeting at Newport . . . 367 Northallerton Agricultural Society ...... 369 Long Sutton Agricultural Society ...... 370 The Royal and Central Bucks Agricultural Association: Meeting at Aylesbury . 371 The Derbyshire Agricultural Society : Meeting at Derby . . . 374 Ayrshire Farmers' Club: The Relations of Landlord and Tenant . . 377 Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act: Deputation to the Duke of Richmond . 381 Liverpool ......... ?84 Inoculation for Pleuro-Pneumonia in Australia .... 387 Sheep in Australia ........ 389 Emigration in 1873 . . . . . . . .390 Tenant-Right and Labour-Right ...... 390 The Farmer's Interest in the "Re-Adjustmbnt" .... 390 A Landlord's Lecture ....... 392 Tenant-Right. ........ 393 The Farmers' and the Labourers' Interests ..... 397 "The Cow Theory" . . . . . . . , . . 398 Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act ...... 399 The Pleuro-Pneumonia Orders ...... 400 The Contagious Nature of Pleuro-Pneumonia .... 400 Shropshire Chamber of Agriculture ...... 401 Kelso Farmers' Club: Autumn Manuring ..... 403 The East Lothian Farmers' Club : Diseases in Animals . . . 405 Labourers' Unions in the West ...... 408 Northampton to Wit ........ 408 Stock and Sheep Sales ....... 410 Review of the Cattle Trade During the Past Month. . . . 422 Review of the Corn Trade during the Past Month . • . . 423 Market Currencies . . . . • • • . 424 i t 1 1 i THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. NOVEMBER, 1S74. PLATE. QUEEN MAR A Royal ShortH'jrx IIeifek, tue Pkopertv of the Rev. R Marnhull, Blandeokd. Omnes exsuperans rurmA Regina Maria, Hoc sibi grande decus pulchra juvenca tulit. Queen Marj', roan, calved July 11, 1872, and bred by Mr. Kennard, at Marnbull, is by Grand Duke of Oxford (28763), out of Queen Ann by Lord Stanley 2Qd (26745), her dam Queen Bertha by Maccaroni (24498)— Mildred by Duke of Norfolk (17735)— Moss Rose by Fanatic (17828)— Lily by Lillivick (10421)— Delight by Nelson (4547)— Dahlia by Milton (8315)— Lily by Merlin (2302)— by Midas (435)— by Denton (198). Grand Duke of Oxford (28763), a roan bred by Lord Braybrooke and calved on May 23rd, 1870, but who early passed into Mr. Kennard's possession, is by Clara's Rose (25784), out of Grand Duchess of Oxford by Seventh Grand Duke (19877), her dam Duchess of Oxford by Rembrandt (13587)— Duchess Nancy by Jasper (11609) — Duchess Nancy by Second Duke of Oxford (9046) — by Second Duke of Northumberland (3646) — by Belvidere (1706)— by son of Second Hubback (2683)— a cow of Mr. Bates', of Kirklevington. Queen Mary is the winner of the following prizes : In 1873, as a heifer-calf, first prize at the meeting of the Bath and West of England Society at Plymouth, in June ; first prize at the meeting of the Royal Counties Society at Southampton, in June ; first prize, as yearling heifer,at the Worcestershire Show at Evesham,in August. Y: B. Kennard, of the Rectory, In 1874, as a yearling heifer, first prize at the meeting of the Bath and West of England Society at Bristol, in June ; first prize at the Essex County Show at Stratford, and the Essex Challenge Cup of 100 guineas, as the best Shorthorn in the show, open to the United Kingdom, in June ; first prize at the meeting of the Royal Agricultural Society at Bedford, in July ; first prize at the meeting of the Gloucester Agri- cultural Society at Tewkesbury, and the Gloucester Challenge Cup of 100 guineas, as the best Shorthorn in the show, open to the United Kingdom, in July. We thus wrote of this famous heifer at Bristol : " Straight and square, with a beautiful coat, and of good quality. Queen Mary is yet more proraisiog than when she came out at Plymouth in 1873, when we thus spoke of her: ' Jlr. Kennard's calf was quite in keeping for good points with the other winners amongst the Short- horn females, having touch, hair, and style ; and she was a long way in advance of the rest of the class.' " At Bedford, speaking of the champion Shorthorn of the time, we said there were some well-merited commendations beyond the prizes in the Shorthorn yearling heifer class, but these were nowhere near the Regina Maria, which has already beaten Telemachus, Vivandiere, Victoria Victrix, Lord Godolphin, and Baroness Conyers ou their merits. THE WINTER SESSION. A polite refresher from Piccadilly serves not only to remind members who wish to see the next Smithtield show that they should pay up their subscriptions, but, even further, that Christmas is coming and both town and country getting back to London. By the last day in October or the first Monday in November the entries close for Birmingham and Islington, as some other more local meetings will reckon up the strength of their classes much about the same time. The Council of the Smith- field Club will again decline to receive any animal which has been exhibited about the country within a month of its arrival at the Agricultural Hall ; but tlicre is a very attractive prsvincial tour open to any star who may not Old SpcRiis.] care to tread the London boards. Thus, he may open at Manchester, and shirking the last day at the Pomona Palace, travel on for a next appearance at Oakham, while he may w'ind up one week and draw a deal of company during the next in Birmingham. After a few days' wel- come rest he shidl turn up again at Leeds, and in due course get through the labours of a month or so at New- castle on this side of the Border or in Edinburgh on the other. ^ eriiy, the life of a prize beast is not all mangel and cake. During the earlier part of this same period a number of now concomitant root shows will be held, such as Sutton's Royal iu Reading, Carter's Royal in London, King's at Coggeshall, and Webb's at Wordsley ; Z Vol. LXXVL— N--. 5. 3i6 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE while on the last day of October the entries will also close for the Farm Prizes of Somersetshire, as offered by the Royal Agricultural Society, and extending to no less than three classes — Hill Farms, Dairy Farms, and other Farms. This, however, is somewhat in anticipatiou, for life in London really begins again witb the discussions of The Farmers' Club, and the conarideration of a paper by Mr. James Howard on Our Villages : their Sanitary Reform. There is certainly a smack of novelty about this subject, which may afford us a look at the labourer in another light. The main topic of the Autumn meetings, the more especially as taken up by the land- lords, has been the working-man's case, and wearisome enough has this become ; but as a question of health there is every opportunity of doing a deal more to develope an Englishman's love for sweet home. On the Tuesday the meeting of the Central Chamber of Agricul- ture will follow ; and on the Wednesday that of the CouncQ of the Royal Agricultural Society in Hanover- square, when it is possible that something more may be heard of the suggestions offered on Bedford race-course, more particularly perhaps as regards the appointment of judges. The Chamber Council has thrown out a series of ques- tions, which promise to lead to an almost interminable discussion. They run thus : 1. Is an entire re-organisa- tion of our road system in England, including the manage- ment and maintenance of turnpikes and highways de- sirable ? 2. Is a re-classiScation of all roads needed ? 3. How many different classes of roads should be estab- lished under a new system ? 4. How should the funds be raised, and from what sources, for the maintenance of each class of road ? 5. What should be the constitution of the governing body of the whole, or of any one class of roads ? Unlike our villages, our highways are getting very worn, as apparently commanding less and less interest. At the meeting of the new Bucks Chamber in Aylesbury the other day there were not more than half a dozen people present, even with two papers read, and no resolution arrived at ; al- though the opening address from the chairman " had the help of one of the members of the present Government. Mr. Sclater Booth." Still, this half-dozen "House" at Aylesbury was by no means unanimous as to what was best to be done, no more than the dozen or so which at the call of the East Suffolk Chamber made up a meeting at Ipswich. It was here decided by five to four not to answer the questions put by the Central Chamber, and by seven to three that " it will be necessary to understand what will be the tendency of future legislation," or, in other words, as a rider ran, " what is the opinion of the Government." This cannot count for much, if the people with a grievance have no opinion of their own to put forward. Then, in West Suffolk on Wednesday, nine versus three decided against the proposal for appointing a general inspector, half the meeting having apparently gone away before the business was over ; while at York, on Thursday a company of just a dozen was very nicely balanced, sis going for and six against two classes of roads ; although at Peterborough they ask for three. The Committee, at least, of the Leicestershire Chamber has adopted a more decisive course, and the following replies to the Central circular were put into our hands during the past week: 1. That it is desirable to re- organise the system of highway management in so far as making the Highway Act of 1862 and 1864 compulsory, and to include the whole management of the turnpikes by the District Highway Boards. 2. Only so far as implied by the answers to the first and third questions. 3. Two. 4. As at present for the highway, but all roads that have been turnpikes should be assisted to the amount of one- half of the expense of repairs from the Consolidated Funds, and the other half from the common fund of the highway district. 5. Highway Boards. It is only right to say that a leading member of another Chamber objected to the "system" recommended here so soon as he heard of it ; but the general meeting in Leicester on Saturday went very much with the Committee. Whatever may be the nature of any further answers received, the Central Chamber should encounter at its next meeting even more than the ordinary difficulty in framing and carrying a resolution. The catechism put forth does not so far seem to have done much to further such an object ; as the discussions have been attended with con- tinual divisions, and the meetings ])retty generally small, tame, and forced. By far the most telling discussion has been that held at Norwich on Saturday, when, at the instance of Mr. Sewell Read, another im- portant demonstration was made in favour of the estab- lishment of County Boards, as distinguished from Quarter Sessions' or mere magistrates' business. THE AGRICULTURE OF DENMARK. Between Denmark and this country there existed in early times the most intimate relations, but the causes which led to the migration of ths people from these northern latitudes can only faintly be discerned. The submersion of considerable tracts of land by the overflow of the waters around the shores of the Baltic, followed by the distress of the inhabitants, was pro- bably in operation ; as the same combination of causes has since driven the Anglo-Saxon race to people America and Australia. From our Scan- dinavian ancestors much that is practical, ener- getic, and good in the English and Scotch character has been inherited ; and the community of feeling that ought to subsist between kindred races has been happily strengthened by the union of the Heir Apparent to the British throne with one of the Princesses of Denmark. The existence of steam power has made one of the most disjointed kingdoms in Europe the most compact, and the facilities for transporting pro- duce to London and our manufacturing districts has prac- tically added another county to England. All the islands and the towns on the Baltic side of the peninsula have thereby been connected with each other and with the capital. Along the northern coast for an extent of nearly three hun- dred miles, which could not be approached by sailing vessels of any ordinary size, owing to sand-banks and the want of harbours, si cam has restored to navigation the only ad- vantage which the ancient mariners in their small vessels with sails and oars had over the modern. The capabilities of the country are essentially agri- cultural. It has no minerals, no water power, from the want of running streams, no fuel for steam-power, no trade or manufactures, except for the supply of its own agricultural population. In all these respects the natural capabilities of Denmark stand out in strange contrast to England. The great progress made every- where of late years in the science of agriculture has extended to this country, and its productive resources continue from year to year to develope. Its corn pro- duction especially has greatly increased. The prominence given to the dairy in aU agricultural operations, whether upon the large or the smallest scale, denote the excess of THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 347 grain beyond the waats of the iohabitauts. The large dairy farms aud baronial estates are almost confined to the coast-side land along the Baltic, and the rest of the country is in the hands of small proprietors. Here we find that the tendency to the division of land into por- tions too small to afford the owner a civilised subsistence is counteracted by causes which do not exist in France and Belgium. There are certain natural seasons in operation : the shortness of the spring season prevents spade hus- bandry ; the want of any building material that is cheap and on the spot, and the severity of the winter requiring substantial houses for all kinds of stock and crops. The fuel also, peat, although cheaper than >?6od, costs some- thing, and a piece of land without a peat moss, or a privi- lege in a moss, would be untenable if it were too small to yield any but a bare subsistence. Amongst even the lowest of the labouring classes, the high standard of education induces a higli standard of living as regards food and lodging ; the tendency therefore of the peasantry is to augment, not to divide and diminish their land ; and it is not at all an uncommon thing for them to club together and purchase crown lands or other estates, and then divide the property amongst themselves according to their share in the purchase. Agriculture and cattle rearing are the chief pursuit and staple wealth of the country, and whilst the productive power of the land has extended, the principal market for the agricultural produce is Great Britain, other countries receiving but little in comparison with ourselves. The yearly average export of corn for British account may be calculated at about 1,319,000 imperial quarters, or nearly the whole of the surplus cereal harvest ; of this quan- tity about half is barley, which is much liked in England for malting purposes. Danish butter also com- mands a good price in the English and Scotch markets, especially the latter, for the Leith market prices dc])end much on the supplies from Denmark. The produce of agriculture in 1872 was greater than in any preceding year. The export of corn, of which the largest propor- tion consisted of barley, amounted to 3,691,730 tonder, or 1,000,000 more than the average shipments of the foregoing seven years. The export of flour showed also an increase of -52,000 barrels. The export of horned cattle was very great ; it amounted to 45,984 he id, against 37,086 in" 1864-71. Sheep to the number of 17,313 were exported, which is about three times above the average of the same period. The fattening and rearing of pigs had increased, and the numbers exported were 111,637, compared with the annual average of only 25,843. In 1872 there were 101,234 barrels of butter exported, compared with an average export of 47,360 barrels. The net value of the agricultural produce amounted to 51,250,000 rix-doUars, whilst the average value of the previous seven years amounted to 23,000,000 rix-dollars, which shows an increase of 18,250,000 rix- dollars. Of the total amount, 271 millions of rix- dollars is obtained from the export of cereals, which had increased by 8,500,000 rix-dollars, and 23 t^ millions of rix-dollars from the export of cattle and their produce, which had increased more than 10,000,000. Of the latter amount 8,000,000 relates to the export of butter, 6,500,000 to that of horned cattle, more than 3| millions of pounds to that of pigs, 2,500,000 to horses, and 2,500,000 to pork and butchers' meat. The efforts of the Danish agriculturist have hitherto been chiefly directed to the cultivation of corn and cattle rear- ing, but at present the tendency is to decrease their cereal and increase their dairy produce and live stock, as being likely to yield a steady return. The potato has been grown chiefly for home consumption and for cattle fodder, and the frequent appearance of the disease has led the Danes to depend less upon it than other agricultural pro- duce ; the yearly sowings arc about 400,000 barrels. Considerable quantities of rapeseed are pressed for oil and the cake used for cattle-feeding, but as it is in this climate a diflicult plant to rear aud often fails, no effort is made to extend its cultivation. Linseed, hemp, and hops are grown to some extent ; but their quantities are unimportant. Cattle-breeding is greatly improved, and more importance is now attached to the increase of good stocks, both from native and foreign breeds. The fodder question had also occupied the attention of the agricul- turist, and the import of oilcake is increasing ; during the year 1864-5 7,500,000 lbs. above the import were exported, whereas during 1872 6,000,000 lbs. oilcake above the export were imported. The result has shown itself in the increase of the export of cattle, pigs and butter. In dairy produce much im- provement had also been made, the cold- water method gaining ground. A dairy with the accessory of ice had been successfully constructed, being the first of its kind introduced into the country. The production of butter in sealed tins for Transatlantic consumption has been^largely taken up. Danish butter has even found its way to the Egyptian markets. The use of artificial manure lias also increased : 12,500,000 lbs. were imported in 1872 against 8f millions of pounds in 1871, and that of natural manure increased from 14,000,000 to 21,000,000 lbs. in the latter year. The conclusion to be drawn from all these facts is that very remarkable activity is noticeable in the agricultural operations of the little kingdom of Denmark ; whilst the increased facilities for communication by land and w. ter has naturally increased the value of all Danish produce. The port of Aarhuus has become the chief place of export for cattle and agricultural produce to Great Britain. In 1865, after the cessation of the war with Germany, there arose a desire among the merchants at the capital and throughout Jutland to export the agricultural produce of the province and its live stock direct to England, on a larger scale than had hitherto been practised, the greater portion of this tratlic having, previous to the war, been effected through Hamburg aud other Holstein ports. The English shipowners were induced to run some of their steamers, and a direct communication with Great Britain was commenced both by steam and sailing vessels. Since then the number employed has somewhat decreased, owing to the Danes themselves having taken a shnre in this carrying traffic. The trade itself has, however, continued to increase ; next to Copenhagen Aarhuus carries on the largest commerce with Great Britain. THE MODERN MARIUS.— On the face of it Mr. Clare Read was appropriately placed as Secretary to tlie Local Government Board, or no doubt he must have been born a poor- law guardian. Somehow, after he was in office, he seemed to have a pensive — nay, lugubrious — look, and he accounted for this in a speech to his constituents a few days since. It scerns that he likes oiticial duties well enough, but even in regard to them his expression was not hearty, whereas he uttered a melancholy jeremiad on what may be called his corporate Ministerial duties. He is sorely tried by those functions of subordinate ofticials which are more imperative than those of their immediate ofiices — namely, those of making a house and keeping a house from four o'clock one day to any hour the next morning. Certainly, sometimes when be has hren sitting on the Treasury bench deep in the small hours liis attitude and demeanour and expression of face were somehow suggestive of Marius amidst the ruins of Cartilage. No doubt he hns often iieard " bright chanticleer proclaim the morn" with pleasure, but then he had not to sit up all night to meet the cheerful bird. He is a representative man in the Administration, and it is to be hoped that he will be able to mould himself to the discomforts which he deplore?, — The Illnstrated News. z 2 348 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE, THE 12th clause. There can be no question but that the farmers as a body have long since ceased to take much interest in the new Parliament. They lost heart, for they felt they had been thrown over ; as perhaps the best evidence of this has been the tone of indifference which has pretty generally characterised the autumn gatherings — " their tameness is shocking to see." As the Session passed away the agriculturist only saw day by day more clearly how remote was the chance of his ever having a hearing. And yet this is all his own fault, as he has just been coolly told by a large landed proprietor at a meeting in Nottinghamshire — " the farmers now had more power than the landlords ; the present Parliament, so far as the county constituencies went, was elected under the ballot, and it was really the tenant farmers who had made the opposition to the 12th clause of the Tenant-Right Bill so strong." This is tolerably plain speaking ; and hence- forth, if the farmer should ever think it worth while to grumble again about no attention being paid to his case, he may expect to hear in answer from some sympathising landlord how " he did it himself — he voted by ballot — why did he not vote for somebody who would do what he wanted ?" And Mr. NevOe, the Nottinghamshire land- lord, said so much aneut Mr. Sewell Read's declaration that " there were not twenty men in the House of Com- mons who would pass the 12th clause." And as Mr. Nevile quoted Mr. Read no further, such a statement standing alone sounds sufficiently alarming ; but in com- mon fairness Mr. Nevile should have gone on to show that Mr. Read himself is one of this miserable minority, as he " would not cross a room to support any measure from which the 12th clause was struck out." Thus, ]\Ir. Nevile and Mr. Read are as directly at issue over this business, when their relative positions are looked to, as it is possible for any two men to be. Mr. Nevile, indeed, some time since delivered himself of a lengthy address, the text of which was Freedom of Contract ; just as Lord Fortescue at Exeter, on only Friday last, was " opposed to legislative interference in this matter. It was very undesirable indeed, where it could be helped, to interfere with the discretion of adults, who ought to look after their own interests. Prima facie all interference with liberty of contract and agreement was in itself an evil which required to be countei'balanced by some very clear and decided advantage. Such interference with the liberty of the subject had a debilitating influence on the character of the people who were thus held in leading- strings," and so on. As has been shown over and over again, the Legislature is continually interfering with freedom of contract, as the phrase goes, and dictating with every advantage the terms upon which the strong man shall deal with the weak, the employer with the employed, the master with the ajjprentice, the buyer with the seller. As to the imperative necessity under the altered circumstances of agriculture for some improvement in the relations between the owners and occupiers of land, it is only to be hoped that for the sake of the public Lord Fortescue and Mr. Nevile are prepared to admit so much ; while as to such interference here conducing to auy moral debility amongst the people whose interests are thus pro- tected, we must hold to precisely the contrary proposition. When some years since The Farmers' Club strung toge- ther a series of reasous for making the Tenant-Right principle general in its action, it declared emphatically that " uncertainty impedes energy, and justice made sub- servient to caprice is no justice at all, as it assumes the power of might rather than the claim of right." And without the 12th clause justice will still be dependent on caprice or something worse. The Devonshire Chamber of Agriculture passed a resolution much in accordance with Lord Fortescue's views — viz., that the landowner should be answerable for compensation or not, just as he pleased to rule it ; and in the same week at a meeting of the Devon and Cornwall Chamber of Agriculture, the following proposal was unanimously adopted : " That the present position of agriculture and the general welfare of the country require early legislation respecting the tenure and occupation of land. That legislation for the purpose of protecting the landlord's property and the tenant's capital should be compulsory excepting in cases where they are mutually and fully protected by lease or agreement." This is about the most straightforward demonstration made for a long day, representing as it really does the opinions of the farmers themselves, when uninfluenced by others. And it is for this the farmers and their friends — if they have any — toust harden their hearts to go ; for as Mr. Snell, who moved the resolution, said, " a permissive bill would not be worth the paper it was printed on, but be a snare, a mockery, and a delusion." Just as Mr. John Fowler said under the Chiltern hills on AVed- nesday, " without the 12tb clause being carried any bill which Government might bring forward on the question would be utterly useless and of not the least benefit to the tenant-farmer ; " or as Mr. Sewell Read puts it, " not worth crossing a room to support." But already the farmers do not quite stand alone, for at Retford Mr. Foljambe, the chairman of the meeting, a large landowner in the county, and, moreover, a member of the House of Commons, declared in oppo- sition to Mr. Neville, that "he disliked permissive bills, and he thought that any measure should apply lo all alike, and be equally binding on all. To take any other course would be unfair." With this before him Mr. Read may begin to count his minority over again. We said in the outset that the farmers have lost heart and have no faith in the new Parliament ; but Mr. Read now explains how he has been, if not openly, still quietly furthering the interests of agriculture by " losing no opportunity of insisting that compensation to tenants for unexhausted improvements ought to be embraced in a measure next session." But Mr. Read says more than this, and on Friday, just when Lord Fortescue and the Devonshire Chamber were fiddling over freedom of con- tract, Mr. Sewell Reid, as something of a corollary on what he himself had been trying to do while in office, told his constituents in Norfolk that " Her Majesty's Government is quite prepared to do justice to the tenant- farmers of England." Coming from such a quarter these are memorable words, aftbrding the promise they do that the tenant-farmer member may still be able to fulfil his mission ; although it is already sufficiently palpable that the principle of the 12th clause will be his great difficulty. THE LATE MR. SAMUEL DRUCE.— At the general raeetin? of the Oxfordshire Agricultural Society the president. Lord Jersey, proposed the following resolution, which was carried unanimously : "That the Society expresses its deep re- gret at the loss by death during the past year of Mr. Samuel Druce, wlio had long been an active member and exhibitor, and begs to offer its sincere condolence to ^Mrs. Druce ou the be- reavement she has sustained." THE FAKMER'S MAGAZINE. 349 SUCCESS TO AGRICULTURE. Success to Agriculture ! The noble chairman or some honourable gentleman has of late been giving this nearly all over the country as one of the toasts of the evening. Not, however, that much has often come of it. The interests of all are identical, and the best thing to do will be to go on pretty much as we have been, relying on and encouraging the mutual good feeling between land- lord and tenant and tenant and labourer. Thus, at Braxted the other day Colonel Brise declared " the three must sink or swim together ;" and, further, that it would never do for the farmers to go and complain how " in the present state of fai-ming we only get a very pre- carious livelihood." But here is one of the most awk vard facts of the present state, or of going on as we Lave gone. If agriculture is to advance, under the present state of things the enterprising tenant is in a most precarious condition, as there is no other word for it than that which Colonel Brise employs. If he spends his money freely, often enough, perhaps, in doing that which was more a duty of the owner than of the occupier, the farmer does list know whether he shall have the time or the right to see his own again. And yet an agricultural member would not be inclined to make any alteration in this present state of farming. For two reasons Colonel Brise would certainly not support any measure which would enable owners and heirs to entailed estates to raise money for farming : " In the lirst place I have much too great respect for the British farmer — I look upon him as the backbone of the country ; and, in the second place, I have too much sympathy with owners and heirs of entailed estates ; and, moreover, I am quite sure that if they ventured their money on farming the heirs would never see anything of it again." These two reasons are virtually one, the assumption being that if a land- owner raised money for improving, that is, for putting his estate in a better condition for cultivation, he must take to farming it himself. This is, so far as we remem- ber, the first time we ever knew the question put in such a way, as it is certain!}' not the general opinion of what should be sought or follow from any amendment in the law of entail. If the owner were permitted to grant more and do more, this privilege would naturally prove mutually advantageous to himself and his tenants, as they would make more of the property, and he in due course have a better rent-roll. Or, if we even confine any better state of things to that which would atfect only the land- lord himself, we may say with a Hereford correspondent of last week, " I never go into Radnorshire without thinking that a Landlord-Right is as much wanted as a Teuant-Right. The sides of the hills that are too steep to cultivate would carry larch trees to an enormous amount ; but how can limited owners go to the expense of planting them when they would all go to the heir-at- law ?" Will Colonel Brise ponder over this query ? that is, if he should not have so strong a sympathy with owners and heirs of entailed estates as to prevent him, as a member of the House of Commons, supporting any mea- sure which would give these gentlemen larger incomes. Success to Agriculture ! " The interest of the tenant was bound up in that of the landlord." This is not very definite, although liberally interpreted it may perhaps be made to stand good for Tenant-Right,the adjustment of the Game evil, and so forth. But just when Colonel Brise was saying so much in Esses a tenant, who was leaving his occupation in the neighbouring county of Suffolk, said at his sale luncheon, distinguishing the employer's and the labourers' interest from that of the landlord, how " They all knew very well that if a thousand acres were cultivated by one man, he would employ more labour than six men farming the same extent of land. There- fore, it was to the capitalist that the labourer would have to look for the improvement of his condition ; and he did not think the labourers would get that improvement unless they got some one to represent them in Parliament who would give them a just Tenant-Right Bill. He did not leave the farm with the slightest amount of regret. He had only been there six years it is true, but they had been six years of annoyance, because he had not been able to get on well with his landlord. He went on four or five years and put up with a very great deal ; at last his landlord so grossly insulted him that he told him it would be best for them to cease their relationship as landlord and tenant. If he had been in the position of some tenants he should have had to leave the farm at a very great sacrifice, but his professional ability enabled him to take care of himself, and he had done it." Somehow or other this does not run very well with that identity of interest and mutual good feeling of which we hear so much as touching on the toast of the evening. Success to Agriculture 1 At this same Braxted dinner, where they talked about everything in a mild pleasant sort of way, from Mr. Mechi and his balance- sheet to compulsory education, another county member, Mr. Round, spoke to the great satisfaction with which every occupier and householder would regard what the present Government had done over local taxation. Mr. Round says nothing as to the landlord's satisfaction, althougti many people are apt to' regard the movement over local taxation as far more a landlord's business than that of an occupier, being, as it is, mainly a matter of adjustment between rates and rent. Still, if ISIr. Round be really in earnest as to what the occupier, or, in other words, the farmer, is to gather from this pet movement ou tlie part of the County Party, he would do well to study this extract from a letter in The Bdllsbiiri/ Journal on the " unequal incidence," as the honourable gentleman himself phrases it, between the taxation of landlord and tenant : " Let a calculation, in round figures, be made of the comparative taxation of the tenant and of the landlord respectively, on the devolution of properties from, say, parent to child, on the death of the former. In regard to the tenant-farmer's stock there would be on intestacy £75 odministration and £25 legacy duty — /. ible repair ? He saw no other way of doing it 80 economically and so well as by the course suggested in the resolution, lie had been glad to hear the mover (Mr. K. T. Gurdon) say he was in favour of county boards, lie did not think they would ever get any real reform iu or improvement of the system of local taxation unless they had good county boards — boards altogether apirt from the quarter sessions, for he had no wish that they should interfere with the luuctions of the magistrates. There would be plenty left for the magistrates to (o. They would have to admluister justice, manage the gaols, and have charge of the police, half the cost of which was now paid ly the Government. The county boards n,ii;lit manage matters relating to bridges, lunatics, weights and measures, they raight have jurisdiction under the Health Act, and of course they would under the Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act, and why should they not have a few roads to look after ? He hoped that though some might be a little bitten by any alteration they would allow the resolution to pass. The resolution haviug been carried by 25 to 5, another motion was made as follows : "That the rest of the highways should con'inue to be managed by parochial surveyors, power being coulerrcd upon some county otlicial to enforce the proper maintenance of the roads wheu the parish neglects to repair them." Mr. C. S. Head also advocated this resolution, saying that the Highway Act of William IV., like a great many other Acts, had failed principally because there were no public pro- secutors iu this country. This resolution wished to put the Act in force. It was not a pleasant thing to indict one's neighbour, and that was the only way a parish could be brought to book under the Act. The resolution suggested that there s-hoald be some county official who should be a sort of referee. One such official would b.i sufficient for the purpo^e. He would in all probability be a man who would have to look alter the great arterial roads, and cons-equently he would be competent to advise and instruct the parochial survejors, who perhaps did not altogether know their duty, and who when they knew it were sometiiufs not quite willing to perform it. This resolution was also adopted. At a meeting of the Essex Chamber of Agricullur", at Chelmsford, Mr. J. S. Gardiner brought before the Chamber the series of ([ueslious on Highway Legislation, received from the Central Chamber, and alter some conversa- tion, iu the course of which a number of propositions and couuter-pro|)Ositions were brought forward, the Chamber de- cided on trans'nitting the following answers : Question 1. Yes. •2. Yes. 3. Two ; county ro ids and parochial roads. 4>. All roads, whether parochial or otherwise should be maintained, half IroiD the Consolidated Fund and half by the parishes. 5. Tire governing body of all the roads in the couuly should be an elected County Financial Board. At a meeting of the Leices'ershirc Chamber of Agriculture a number of answers from the special committee to questioiH submitted by the Central Chamber on the subject of highway legislation were reci ived and discussed, and a propo- sition was carried, after some discussion, that it was desirable to reorganise the system of highway management in so far as making the district system compulsory, and to include the whole nianagenieut of the turnpikes by the district highway boards. It w as further resolved tliat the fund for the maintenance of the roads be derived from the common fund of the highway district ; that there should be only one class of roads estab- lished under the new system ; and that highway boards should consiitirte the governing body. The following were the replies as originally suggested by tire special committee: 1. That it is desirab.e to reorganise the system of highway management in so far as making the Highway Act of 1S63 and 1S61 compul- sory, aad t') iruvu.le the wlule maaagement of the turnpikes by the District Highway Boards. 2. Only so far as implied oy the i'Uswers to the first Hud third questions. 3. Two. 4. As at present lor ttie highway, but all roads that have been turnpikes should be assisted to the amount of one-half of the expense r.f repairs from the Consolidated Funds, and the other half fro-n the uoinmoa fuud of the highway district. 5. Higliway Boards. At a special meeting of the Nottinghamshire Chamber of Agriculture, Mr. G. Storer, M.P., said that the first THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 35 5 question from tlie Ceutral Cluunber was somewhat ambiguous, because tliere exi.-ted two systems with regard to the raanaf;e- nienl of our roads— tiie old parochi il system, aud the new system of having liighway boards. As far as this county was concerned the new system worked well, though he was aware tliat it was not so salisfiictory in some districts as in others. lie thought they could h irdly give a categorical answer to tlie question without distinguishing between the new and the old systems, but he was in favour of maintaiuing the new system, which he thought ought to be made compulsory all over the country. lis was of opinion that permissive plans were not satisfactory, and that they did not generally work well. The general feeling of the Chamber was m favour of a reorganisa- tion of the road system, and it was decided to answer the first and second questions atfirmatively. With reference to the other questions, the Chamber was of opinion that at least two different classes of roads should be established under a new system; that three-fourths of the expenses of the turnpikes should Ije paid out of the Consolidated Fund, and that other roHds should be supported out of local rates ; aud, as, to the last question, the meeting thought that the whole should be managed by district boards, subject to a Government inspection of the roads to which they contributed part of the cost of maintenance. At a meeting of the Cambiidgeshire Chamber of Agricul- ture, Mr. Kodwell, M.P. said the present permissive act with regard to highways was inoperative and un- satisfactory. He agreed with the principle that every parisli should maintain its own roads; but, at the same time, some elasticity was required to meet hardships, in exceptional cases, and some form of classification would not be objectionable. At a meeting of the Peterborough Chamber of Agriculture' a resolution from the chairman, Mr. Wells, in favour of Highway Boards, was put and carried. It was further agreed that a re-e!assificationof roads was necessary ; that tliere should be three classes of roads ; that turnpike roads should be maintained out of the Consolidated Fund, and O'dinary roads by a district rate ; and that district highway boards would be the best form of management. At a meeting of the East Sufi'olk Chamber of Agriculture, at Ipswich, Lord Hea'niker, in the chair, explained that they were met to [consider a communication which had been received from the Central Chamber of Agriculture. This was the first meeting that had been held this year, but he was one of those who thought that a society of this kind should not create a subject for discussion. He had always held that opinion, and when he was President some years since, he thought it his duty to do as he had done this year, to recom- mend that they should only meet when there was anything important which it was worth the while of the Chamber to discuss. It was far wiser that they should keep their organisation together in a healthy state, so that when it was required to discuss an important subject, that organisa- tion would be available for the purpose. He felt that it was a great pity to meet and have an empty discussion, and he believed that a great many members of the Council agreed with him in that opinion. It was not really from the fact that there was a paucity of subjects to discuss that they had not been able to meet this year, but he observed that other Chambers had followed their example, and had not held dis- cussion meetings. The fact of tlie matter was, the present Government came into power in the middle of the Session as it were, without having time to consider any measures they were going to bring forward, and he considered it most likely that everybody had been waiting to see what measures the Government would propose in the next Session. With regard to the particular subject which they had met to consider to- day, they were, perhaps, in the same position ; but it had been stated on one or two public occasions that tbe Government would probably bring in a measure next year ; and if this Chamber could have a fair discussion upon the subject, and could generally answer the questions which were put by the Central Chamber, he thought it might be of service in bringing the matter under the notice of the Government, showing the importance of it, and how strong a feeling existed in reference to it. A road measure had been promised year after year by the House of Commons, but something or other had always come in the way to pre- vent its being brought forward, and this year, again, it ap- peared that there might be several measures wliich might b • likely to come in the way of any road measure, and possibly they were no nearer than ever they were to having such a med^l/re brought forward. Undoubtedly one of the most im- porl.iiii local subjects was that of Local Taxation, and he felt that this subject liad an important bearing on the settleraeut of that question. And if a certaiu number of Chamberi could answer the question generally in a satisfactory manner, it would tend to show that there vvas a strong feeling that some measure should be passed, making an alteration in the system of road management, and i^ would have some cflVct in inducing the Government to consider this question. For t!u t reason it would be generally felt that the Central Chamber had taken a wise course in the action it had adopted. The questions they had to consider were these: 1. Is an entire reorganisation of our road system in Eng- land, including the management and maintenance of turnpikes and highways, desirable ? '2. Is a re-classification of all roads needed ? 3. How many different classes of roads should be estab- lished under a new system ? 4. How should the funds le raised, and from what sources, for the maintenance of each class of road ? 5. What should be the constitution of the governing body of the whole, or of any one class of roads? Possibly there would be a great difference of opinion on these different questions asked them by the Central Chamber, but probably there would be a general feeling amongst all the Chambers in favour of legislation on the subject, in (act s-.n- ing that legislation was necessary. The present management of roads in many parts of England was fi It to be a great grievance, especially in the North of England, and even also in our rural district^, particularly where turnpike trusts had been done away. Some turnpike trusts were thrown upon the parishes, and others were thrown upon the districts ; aud some of the old turnpikes were used lor main roads, whilst others were only used lor the parish roads, but even where they were only usefcl for the latter purpose, the parish was compelled by law to keep up these old turn- pike roads to the original width, although they might be a great deal wider than were actually required. In the North of England there was a great deal of mineral traffic passing through the rural parishes from and to tjwns which did not contribute to the maintenance of the roail, though they had the benefit of the traffic thereon. It some- times happened that a parish was keeping up a turnpike road which was out of debt, the trust being abolished, but the rate- payers had to go but a few miles before they were on their neighbours' roads where a toll existed, and though they pro- vided a free road for their neighbours they could not travel far without having to enter a parish where there was a debt and toll still existing. He was a member of the Committee on Iloads'iu the House of Commons for several years, and they considered the subject very carefully indeed, aud came to the unanimous opinion that an alteration was required, that a re- classification of roads was necessary, and also that the burdens should be more equally distributed according to the class of roads to be dealt with. No doubt some persons might wish to go back to the old parochial system. This might be possible in some counties, and in some parts of our own county it might work very well, but in other parts of England it would be almost impossible, particularly in the North of England, where with the heavy mineral and coal traflic, such a system would be a great injustice, and he thought it would be lound, when the matter was looked into carefully, that it would not be wise in all cases to go into the parochial system. If they were agreed that alteration was necessary in the management of tlid roads, then the question arose as to how to carry it out. There was one plan that had been often discussed, and discussed with some reason because it was a simple one to carry into effect, and it was this : The turnpike roads, and all roads leading to stations, roads between great towns, and those which were the main arteries of communication should be placed upon the county rate, aided, if possible, by a Government grant ; aud that all the other roads should beplaced upon a district rate, a small district probably taking the High- way Act as the basis, altering it in some respects, for it did require some alteration, particularly with regard to supervision of labour, which might be improved if properly considered. There were a great many other plans which might be sug- 354 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. gested ; but this one liad beeu generally discussed, and liad the merit of being a simple and easy one. Then we come to the question as to tlie authority to carry out the niauagemeut of these roads. As regarded the district, there would be a District Board, and as regarded tlie county, it would have to be some county authority : perhaps the magistrates at quarter sessions, or perhaps a county financial board committee. He did not anticipate, however, tliat there would be any difficulty in that respect. He sincerely hoped one tbiug, and it was this, that as regarded tlie parochial roads, they would not be placed under a central authority, because he thoHght those who lived in the district were much better able to manage and keep a road in repair than a central authority could possibly be. One tiling was quite certain, and that was they needed uniformity. It sometimes happened that in one district the roads were mostly good, and in the next tiiey were very bad ; and there ought to be some uniform system of management, for in a country like tliis, where we ought to manage our affairs properly, we should have some uniform system by which to make up the roadsequally good all over the country. With these few remarks he would ask gentlemen present to give their opinions, so that satisfactory answers might be sent to the questions put by the Local Government Board. Mr. William Gurdon contended that the roads were used to a great extent by those who lived in the locality, and he thought they ought to be managed by those who lived in the immediate neighbourhood of them. He observed that the abolition of the turnpikes threw the whole thing into disorder, and said the question was what was to be the system lor deal- ing with the roads in the future. Was it to be a centralising system ? We should hardly in the present day ask the Govern- ment to keep up the roads as they used to do in France. He was quite sure it would add greatly to the expense of the country. He felt that at his time of life he should never see any change. In the Western Division of the county the Highway Board system had been tried, and it had not been altogether unsuccessful, because, he observed, with respect to the Laveuhani Board, that monstrous as was the district, they had been enabled to save over £1,000, and he was sorry to say that at the meeting at which this fact was stated, it was decided to dissolve the Board. This was certainly not very encouraging. The plan of the Rev. Mr. Cox, a clergy- man in Essex, who had taken great interest in this matter was to have a road inspector. This was no new thing, but he fMr. Gurdon) thought there were few genllemen present who would like an inspector to come into their parishes and find fault with the work which they had done. Let them consider the whole question carefully, and possibly after all they might come to the conclusion that it was their duty to attend to their o^Yu roads ; that they could keep them up cheaper than any other body, because they had the requisite knowledge, and the opportunities of putting the materials on to the roads at the most suitable time; and that it vi'as their concern to have their own parish roads in as good a state as possible, lit should like gentlemen to come and see the 1,200 yards of road he had by the side of his farm which he made himself. It was a fact that this c<;st less for mending thsn the other roads in the parish, and he had this proof that the system of making a good road was the cheaper plan. Mr. H. CoopEK (Holton) was strongly against the Highway Board system. He imagined that those who had adopted tlmt Jiystem were now anxious to get rid of it, because they found it much more costly. A person must be better able to attend to the roads of the parish in which he resided than another who resided some distance off, and who had a large district to attend to. In his district the roads generally were in a very good state, and for liis own part he did not see any necessity for any alteration in the present system. He thought if all the parishes in the district embraced by one of the Highway Boards were polled there would be found a large majority in favour of a dissolution of the Board. Mr. B,. L. Everett said that the inequality with which the roads in the different parishes were kept up was a glaring anomaly. There were plenty of instances of there being as good roads as could be desired iu one parish, but if )ou went into another you found them very bad. If the pre- sent system was to be continued it was necessary that there should be an inspector or some one to force all the parishes to do their duty; and then he thought with Mr. Cooper that there was no cheaper way of mending the roads than under the parochial system. There were roads wliich had a town at ■each end, and it did seem hard that the residents iu a parish through which the road passed should have to pay the cost of the wear and tear of the traffic by which they were benefited but a very little. He thought the turnpike system had its advantage, but the feeling of tlie country was decidedly against them. He should be inclined to answer the questions put by the Central Chamber in the affirmative, that the charges should be divided, that the roads which were main thorough- fares should be paid for on a different basis to those wiiich Her parochial roads, and used entirely by those who lived in the neighbourhood. ^Ir. J. A. Hempson said there was a very great question as to whether this Chamber would be able to fall m with the resolutions in the form in which they were put by the Central Chamber. At the same time it was a large and important question, and turnpikes and conimou roads appeared now to be reduced to the same level. As to the main roads between two great towns, it must be remembered that there was hardly a town, of any importance, which had not a railway con- nected with it, and this had the effect of very greatly re- ducing the traffic on the roads. He did not see how, unless they upset the whole s\ stein by putting the whole thing under a Government Department, how it was possible to better the present parochial system. There were, no doubt, exceptions with regard to districts in the North, and there were much the same giievances in some of our districts. There was a great deal of traffic in some cases from a considerable neighbourhood to some of the country railway stations, and the parish in the imme- diate neighbourhood had to bear all the expense of keeping up the road. For some time he had observed that compari- sons had beeu drawn between town and country expenses. It was said tliat the towns-people used the roads extensively, and did not pay towards keeping them up ; but it must be borne in mind that people who lived in towns had to pay the paving and lighting rate, and heavy expenses for keeping up the roads, which country people when they came to the towns had the lull benefii; of. He thouglit, therefore, the towns and the county parishes might fairly cry quits over the matter. He thought the question would arise before long as to whether the whole traffic of the country should not be brought under a Uovernment department. This was a subject that would be the strong question of the day before long. He referred to the railways and the traffic of the country generally. He asked whether the management of the railways was satisfactory, aud, referring to the late Thorpe accident, said it would have been impossible for that accident to have occurred had the railways been under Government control, because they would not have tolerated a single line. Mr. F. S. CoRRA2ed to be, and would o..^ ,iie_v ucM- only one ratepayer, and did not see why tlu-y should expose ihemselves to be found fault with and get no thanks for their tiouble. They were always open to the charge of keeping the roads nearest their ovvn residence better than those at a dist;ince, and sometimes they luid almost been accused of dishonesty 'but he did not think there had b'en much of tliaf, although there had sometimes been something approaching it). Tliey would have some security in the in- spector which the Ciiairinan proposed, and whom they must have under any circumstances, lie did nut think one for the whole cmiiity wou'd do. They would require three or four; otherwise the expense of travelling would be heavy when tliey wanted him to look at some little thing or other. His o.va opinion was that the roads could be most satisfactorily worked by district boards; but, unfortunately, as people began to get used to them, they dissolved themselves. He thought it was a mistake of the magistrates to let them dissolve so easily. It was a very amiable thing for them to do, but he thought th»-y displayed more kindness than judgment in the matter. The expense ol the large bridges, or liiree-fuurths of if, he would throw upon the county. Plbv. p. M. Sted.man : Would you made each parish pay for its own roads ? Mr. BiDDELL : No, I would make it a district charge, ex- tending over 15 or 20 parishes, but not so many as is sometimes included now. The Chairman asked the meeting to deal with the resolu- tions separately, and to consider first that condemning turn- pikes. Lord AuriusTUS Hervey, M.P., thought there was some d.fficulty in dealing wi;h the question otherwise than as a whole. The fourth question was really the key to the matter. Unless they were prepared to say how the funds were to be raised, he did not know how they could see their way clear as to the other points. They were much obliged to the Central Chamber fur bringing the subject forward, but he was uot sure they would do wisely in saying tliey were really unable to give definite answers to these questions until the bill in anticipation, of which they were put, came before them in the usual form. Whatever solution was attempted to be pro- posed in the shape contemplated by these questions, it became very much a matter of detail. He had not had much es- perience in road management, but he thuught that unless they could answer these questions categorically, they would do wisely to return some general answer, and await the bill that seemed to be expected. He thought it was very probable the question of distribution of parishes in respect to roads waj only part of a much larger qviestion, the subject of taxation generally, which was constantly corning up, and constantly assuming new shapes and forms. As soon as one tax was diminished or abolished, the incidence of the remaining taxa- tion pressed in a different ratio to what it did before. Some years must necessarily pass before this could be rectified ; and he could only suggest that the minds of those interested should be constantly directed to the subject, and that when the matter was ripe for rectification, they should put that pressure upou their representatives which was proper. Mr. BiDDELL thought Government might wish to have in- formation from the Central Chamber, and so obtain the views of the country on the matter. Mr. Paine thought they would be a useless body if they did not return answers to such questions as these. He approved of the Chairman's resolutions, except one. Those who had had experience with roads would say that the parochial manage- ment was very bad. To revert to that was almost the last thing they would like. He might differ from some of his neighbours, but he was himself inclined to desire more cen- tralisation. He would suggest the division of the county into districts of six or ten miles wide, as the parishes might fit ; and that the repairs of the roads should be done by contract under the supervision of an inspector or surveyor-general, as mentioned by the Chairnoan. He had had a great deal of experience in the management of roads, and he always found the contract system to be the one that answered best. AU that was required was that some one acquainted with the management of roads should see the contracts properly carried THE FARMEE'S MAGAZINE, 357 out. This was better tliau having a paid surveyor or sab- surveyor and an irresponsible body of waywardens. Colonel Parker, M.P., said lie felt lie should not be doing his duty to those among wliom he lived if he did not ex iress his hearty support of the propositions of their chairman. Tlie subject now before them reminded them of what took place some years ago, and would confirm the impression many of them entertained then of the unsuitability of highway boards to meet tlie requirements of this district. The expression of feeling by the waywardens, whether ex ojjicio or elected, hud been almost unanimous against them ; and he was glad to hcnr the chairman, after the great experience he had had, say that he found the highway system, as applied under the rennissive Bill, had not met the requirements of tne country. They now reverted to the old parochial system, and he should likf- to know what there was in that system that any one desiring good roads at a cheap cost could possibly find fault uiili. Was it for a moment to be tolerated tiiat any oue should say they did not understand the management of their own roads ? They had teams and cirts, and facilities for getting materials of every kind, and what should prevent them making the best of them? It had been himcd by the vice-cliairman that some- times roads were not equally good all over the parish, aud that there sometimes w»s jubbery ; but if the roads were uot good there was un ler the old Act pnwer given to two magis- trates to enforce improvement, and not only that, but to inflict penalties upon the surveyois. The iniprissiou that it rr. quired a long, tedious process of indictment was q'>ile erro- neous. He need hardly say that the magistrates were always ready and desirous to do all they could, in common with the surveyors, to make the roads such as would inett the require- ments of the country. They all wanted good roads, but at the same time they wanted lo secure them at the cheapest cost. Was it not monstrous tlipy should be called upon to pay people for doing what they could do themselves ? They were re idy and willing to do it ; and were they to be superseded in tlieir little localities by other people, and pay the cost? As a ratepayer and a farmer, he could not tolerate it. He was glad that, with the dissolution of the hiuhway board, they were about to revert to the old parochial system. Tliuse jiarishes or locali- ties which desired to have a surveyor of their own were per- fectly at liberty to do so und?r that Act. If two or three parishes wished to combine for that pur])o.oe, in a way uot very dissimilar to the higliMay boards, tliey cuiild ni.t do so. While they retained under the old Act all these powers and all this liberty to do what they liked with their own, he ad- vised them not to part with it. Long experience of ten or twelve years had shown them the Board system did not answer. They must, therefore, revert to the old system aud reap the advantages the experience had given tliem. The Chairman said he was origiual'y in favour of the board system, and he was still of opini(jn it could be made to work ; but at the same time, though he had done all he could to make it work, he was bound in honesty to say it had uot worked satisfactorily. There were two reasons why the Black- bourn Highway Board was led to afiply for a dissolution. They might devise the most perfect system of machinery pos- sible theoretically, but if they had a hostile board it could not be made to work. They all knew the highway board system was not popular from the very first in this district, and to try to carry it on in the face of public opinion would be simple obstinacy. If the Act had been compulsory he thought they would have heard much less about it. The other cause for dissolving the Blackbourn Board was that Government thought fit to throw the charge of the turnpike roads upon the general charges where a highway board existed ; but where one did not exist it was thrown upon the parishes They thought it was very unjust to saddle the general fund with this. There was a hardship, it was true, in throwing them upon the parishes through which they passed, but the hardship was a very small one. It was only that the roads were a little wider than they would have been had it uot been for the old through traffic. He agreed with Lord Augustus Hervey that if they could not see their way clear they had better say nothing; but this seemed to be one of the subjects with which they were so practically conversant that they would not like to say they did not know what to do with ilieir highways. The firit of the resolutions read by the chairman was unani- mously agreed to. The second resolution also passed. The question of the constitution of the governing bodies of roads was then discussed. Mr. J. Harrison thought the solution of the difficulty would be to make highway boards compulsory. He had proved to the satisfaction of the Blackbourn Highway Board that notwithstanding the expense of salaries and so forth, the cost was not above a farthing aud half a farthing more, that after the turnpike was brought in, a trifle under a penny. Surely a man who has his own business to attend to would not grudge that. If the Act had been compulsory there would not have been lialf the " to do" there had been. It ought to be withiu the power of \\v: board to dismiss the surveyor. Mr. MaM'IKLD : So it is, fut we never got a majority. Mr. A. CoLSuN did not agree with tlie highway board s\s em, because it had cost his parish about £22 a-year more liian the (dd system, and they had had no new bridges or any- thing of the sort. The rates were very nearly double, and the roads were no better. He iho.igbt if each parish appointed a surveyor, and there was an iuspector for every sixty or seventy parishes, the work being left in the hands of the surveyor or waywarden, it would work better. He did not think there was anjbody better to manage the roads than some one on the spot. He h.id driven a long distance sometimes to the Black- bourn Highway .'joard, had heard a long discussion about a bridge he never saw, and did not understand, and was then asked to vote upon the question. To men who paid Income- tax under Schedule B their time would come to more than the bridge would cost. Mr. Harrison called attention to the fact that two years before the dissolution of the Blackbourn Board they passed a unanimiius resolution that the Act was working well. Mr. CoLsoN said it was a very small board meeting when that was pa-sed. Mr. J] AN KIEL!) proposed, and Mr. Smith seconded, the adoption of tbe chairman's resolution on the subject. The Rev. C. W. Jones thought that if they reverted to the parochial system some supervision would be necesary, because they knew that in some parishes they found good roads, while iu tlie next they were just as bad. He knew there was a law to compel the surveyor to keep thera in order, but it was an invidious task for a neighbour to put it in motion, and a public prosecutor would be very necessary. His experience was that the highway hoards were cheaper than the old system. He knew cases where men when they were ill in bed had been paid under the old system for working on the roads. JMr. Salmon cautioned tlie members aga'nst any system which would introduce a stranger to interfere with their roads. The Chairman remaiked that the surveyor would always have to bring the cases before the magistrates, who would have to decide on the merits of the case. Mr. H.ARRISON said lie knew two miles of road under the old system that could not be put in proper repair for less than £25 a mile. The resolution was then put to the vote, and six voted against it and three lor it, therefore the appointment of au iuspector was negatived. Lord Augustus IIervey, M.P., then moved "That this Chamber is further of opinion that any inequality of taxation to which the maintenance of roads as a charge upon real property contributes, should be met by a general adjustment of fiscal burdens." The Chairman remarked that the purport of this was that if they took the burden of the roads upou themselves, that should be considered in regulating other taxation. The resolution was seconded and agreed to, and a vote of thanks to the Chairman terminated the proceedings. At an adjourned meeting of the York Chamber of Agricul- ture, in York, Mr. W. J. Ware in the chair, a circular from the Secretary of the Central Chamber of Agri- culture was read, submitting certain resolutions which had been passed, and asked the opinion of the York Chamber on five questions, which were set forth. The first question was — Is an entire reorganisation of our road system iu England, in- cluding the management and maintenance of turnpikes and highways, desirable ? and on the motion of Mr. Peacock, seconded by Mr. Lett, it was answered in the affirmative, the latter gentleman observing that he did not agree with the present system, and that there was not a man in his parish who knew how to make a road. As to the second question — Is a re-classification of all roads needed ? — Mr. T. Watkinson 358 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. thought that such an arrangement was most important and desirable. Mr. Lett said a re-classification of turnpikes was necessary, because since some of these had been taken away it was very hard upon some parishes, where the roads were used by parties who had nothing to pay for it. He could not see why it was necessary to have the parishes classified. Mr. Smith said that all roads on wiiich her Majesty's subjects could pass without let or liindrance should be brought under one system of management ; he would make no difference between high-roads, occupation-roads, or bridle- paths. Tolls would certainly be better done away witli, be- cause now, with thepreseut railway 'system, they were a com- plete tax on some places, wliilst others were exempt. He would have the cost of maintenance defrayed, one half by tlie county rates and the otlier half by the Consolidated Fund, and all the roads put ou an even principle of management. Mr. CiiOLMELEY agreed tliat all the roads should bo on one system. If the road was a turnpike the debt migiit be ex- tinguished, and if an occupation road an arrangement might be made with the proposed object iu view. If they had a divided responsibility between the waywardens, tlie highway board, and the occupiers, they would not know how to fix the liability for repairs, and they would go on as they were, and in many places they could not be much worse. All those places should be placed under one head. A re-classification having been resolved upon, the third question was submitted: How many different classes of roads should be ertablished under a new system ? Mr. CiiOLMELEY repeated that they should, he thought, have not more.than one^class. Of course to do that the debt on the turnpike road would have to be extinguished by some means; and the occupation roads could not be taken without compensation, which could be done by arbitration. Those turnpikes which were in dispute ought to be maintained by the parishes first of all. He thought it was disgraceful that any- body should now be able practically to throw up a road, and the Act said >,hey could do so. The main principle was tJiat every public highway should be maintained by the public, and be made one system. In Ireland they had admirable roads, which were all under the county rates. He proposed tiiat there be only one class of roads. Mr. Linton seconded the proposition. Mi. T. Watkinson moved as an amendment that there be two distinct classes— roads tliat were turnpike, and roads which were not. Mr. DuxN seconded the amendment, remarking that he did not see how the matter could be equitably worked without dividing the roads of the kingdom into two classes. The main arterial roads were not made for local trafiic but for general traffic, i'Ud it would seem hard aud unjust where turnpikes were abolished that the expense of the main road should fall on the real estate and property of the neighbourhood. The introduction ofrciilways had altered the aspect of the question very much, aud before their introduction such a question would never have been raised; at the same time an arrange- ment should be provided by wh'ch the n;ain arterial roads might he helped — they ahiuld have some fund for the pur- pose and not throw the expense altogether on the parishes. Mr. Linton thought that all the roads should he put under supervision of the highway board. The amendment and resolution having been respectively put to the meeting, six hands were held up I'or each, and tlie numbers being thus equal the chairman gave his casting vote in favour of two classes. In respect to the source whence to raise the funds for the maintenance oi' each class, Mr. Dunn said with reference to the parish roads he would lay the expense as it was laid at present, but as to the turn- pike and main roads liis idea was that the taxes assessed upon carriages and different vehicles should be made over to each county or each riding, and that out of that fund one half the expense should go to maintain the arterial roads, and the other half be paid by the pansiies and townships through which they passed. That would relieve the townships of the injustice of making the roads altogether. This seemed to be a fair and legitimate course. Mr. Linton : Would you tax the farmers' carriages? Mr. Dunn : I would not put on them a single tax more than they have at present. What we already pay goes to the Consolidated ^und. Give the matter a local application and collection, and the arterial roads would be maintained from that fund ; it would not be very much, but it would be something. Mr. CnoLMELEY said he was in favour of the Irish system ; the roads in that country, under the new xVct, being simply admirable ; in fact, he had never seen a bad road there. The expense was borne by the separate districts, which had their surveyors, or by what wc would here call the different wapen- takes. They might give ten years' purchase for the roads, so as to get entire control over them. Mr. Lett would not have the roads put into the hands of the county surveyor, because that would be taking them out of their hands. Mr. Watkinson : Suppose half the expense should be paid for turnpikes out of the county rates, and the other half by the districts? IMr. KiLBY said iu the West Riding they objected to higli- way districts, each township supervising its own roads and paying its own expenses. Mr. CiiOLMLEY proposed that a^und be raised out of an increased area, and not under the parochial system. The parishes would not fail to see that tlie roads were properly kept, and there would be no inducement to " scamp" the roads by doing cheap work. Mr. Linton said they should take a broad view of the question, and lose sight of any particular locality or place. The Legislature looked to them, he expected, for these re- pairs, and there were at present four Acts of Parliament with which they ought to have been acquainted ; he would be very glad if they had but one, which would be an advantage to the ratepayers generally, whether it would be to the lawyers or not. If they were to have highway boards then they could not do better than to levy the expenses over each district. He would do away with all parish boundaries, have an equal pound rate in each district, and have but one account. He had found this diflRculty, that the man who spent the least money, no matter what damage he did to the highway or how he neg- Ifcfed his duty — if he saved a £5 note he was the popular man, who received the placi", but the man who set to work to imjirove damages and set the foundations of the road, got into dispute w'ith the ratepayers, more especially if the sur- veyor was likely to change farms. In this manner tlie high- way had sufi"ered most materially, and under the circumstances always would »o long as they had a constant change of sur- veyors without any reference to suitability, capability, or responsibility. He suggested that all parishes be done away with, tliat they have an equal pound rate, and ail expense be levied on each district, and not on each parish. He supported Mr. Cholmeley's proposition. Mr. Dunn was in favour of Mr. Watkinson's suggestion. Mr. KiLBY moved that each parish pay for its own roads, as at present, but there was no seconder. On the question being put the motion of Mr. Watkinson, that one-half the expense of maintaining roads be raised from the county rat?, and the other half from the district with re- gard to turnpikes, was carried. The fifth and last question was. What should be the cjusti- tutiou of the governing body of the whole or of any one class of roads ? Mr. KiLBY proposed that the ratepayers should be t)ie governing body as at present, Mr. Ciiolmeley moving as au amendment that a county surveyor be appointed, who slioufd be responsible for carrying out the rrqturements of the Act. The original inotio i was carried. A MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE.— At the opening of the winter session of the Winfrith Farmers' Club, Jlr. Waller, of the Home Cattle Defence Associatic n, delivered an address in which he spoke against " a sham foreign market in London," and queslionrd the necessity for inspection. He asked, further, whether education and cittle should be inseparably associated? and if the interests of butchers, dealers, and retailers were to be considered para- uiount? He proceeded to advocate the appointment of a 3Iinister of Agriculture, iu which he was supported by Mr. Saunders, of Watercombe, and others. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 359 STEAM CULTIVATION. [The following letter has been forwarded to us by Lord Kinnaird.] Kossie Priory, Inchture, 3rd October, 1874. Deak Sir Williaji, — According to your request I send you some papers on steam cultivation. Not having made up a complete statement for the past two years, I jot a few hurried remarks which may prove of service for the purpose you mention. I began to cultivate by steam in the year 1861 with one of Howard's roundabout sets of tackle, that is, with robe and anchor at each end of the field, and one engine. In that year, while engaged on the Mines Commission in the North of England, I made acquaintance with the late John Fowler, who had devoted many years and a large amount of capital towards developing the cultivation of land by steam power; and in the year 1862 he informed me that he had at last accomplished the object of his life and had seen the way to repay the large advances made by his friends. His health having broken down, became to stay with me for a change of air, and brought with him a 14 (nominal) horse-power engine and tackle, consisting of a windlass which, being attached to an anchor at the opposite corner of the field, moved forward parallel to the engine as the work proceeded. This plan accomplished the work better and more expeditiously than the round- about system, which I then abandoned, as it took up more time and required more men to attend to the anchors. Fowler's clip drum for catching hold of the wire rope was a most ingenious plan invented by a pianoforte maker in his employment. Poor Fowler, who was one of the most intelligent and enthusiastic engineers I had ever met with, did not live to see his plan brought to perfection by the adoption of the double engine system. At one time I contemplated the roundabout system on an extensive scale by the use of water-power in the middle of a farm. It is a cnrious circumstance that the first idea of cultiva- ting land by other power than horses originated with a farmer in the Carse of Govvrie, who|made use of his water- wheel to work the plough. If I mistake not. Fowler pur- chased his patent. Late in 1864 I ordered a second fourteen horse-power engine from Messrs. Fowler and Co., which, with the one I got in 1862, T have worked regularly up to the present day not only on the level carse but on the hillsides : these engines are in a more efficient state than when they were started. At the earlier stages we had various diticulties to contend with, such as keep- ing the water in the boiler while moving on steep inclines, signalling from the one engine to the other when rising ground intervened, &c. On one occasion one of the engines in crossing a bog would have disappeared alto- getber had it not been dragged out by its coadjutor. Such a difficulty is now met by a simple contrivance whereby the engine is enabled to pull itself out. What I suffered most from was the frequent breakage of tackle, and occa- sionally the giving way of parts of the engine got in 1864. The one I got in 1802 has required little or no repairs beyond a new fire box, showing not only the engine, but the implements even of every bolt should be made of steel, or the best Low Moor, or iron of similar quality. My only trouble now is with the tubes, which are injured by muddy water. The cry for cheap engines is a mistake, as the cheap engines are certain to become very expensive through frequent repairs — breakages being the only drawback, besides the original outlay, to the general adoption of st^am cultivation. No set of engines should be without an experienced mechanic, who with the aid of a country blacksmith can execute any slight repairs, or re- place parts which may be procured from Leeds on tele- graph order. I have a small workshop, with an intelligent mechanic or engineer, as I am engaged in carrying out improvements in steam cultivation. I have successfully brought into use on my farms a combined harrow and roller, and expect to be able to turn out a drain plough, to cut drains 3^ to 4 feet deep, at a cost of only a few shillings per acre. The greatest advance, however, that I have made is by the purchase of two twenty (nominal) horse-power engines for the purpose of 'knifing, or subsoiling to a depth of from two lo three feet, thus opening up the soil, taking off the water, and letting in the air without bringing the subsoil to the surface. I am satisfied that by this method one-half of the number of drains might have been dispensed with. The value of subsoiling or breaking the "pan" is now generally admitted. It not only lets the water filter away quickly, but facilitates the roots getting down to the fresh soil. In the case of wheat, these would, in congenial soil, extend as far down as the stalk rises above the surface. The knifing can be done on clay land, where there are no stones, at a cost not exceeding 5s. an acre for coals, oil, and men's wages. Indeed, I find that all other work can be done much more economically and expeditiously by these powerful engines than by the fourteen horse-power engines, which I intend to dispose of. With a 7 or 8-furrow plough, rollers and harrows 12 feet wide, engines 600 yards apart on a 20 acre field, will give you some idea of the expedition with which the work is done by the large engines. I can even undertake with the large engines to cultivate a greater extent of land than the 630 acres which I work with the fourteen horse-power engines, by which I save nine pair of horses and six men. I'aking the present price of horses at £75 per horse, harness, ploughs, and implements at £300, makes a saving in stocking a farm of £1,650, or within a little of the cost of a double set of engines, with tackle complete, costing £1,S00. The higher wages of the engine and ploughdrivers, with the amount paid for coals and oil, will bear no comparison with the keep of horses — besides, when the engines are idle they do not eat. The wire rope on clay land lasts five years. Put the cost of repairs at the outside at £70 or £100 per annum, which is much less than blacksmiths' bills, and the tear and wear of horse-flesh and implements, &c. The superiority of steam cultivation over horse work was characteristically put in the remark of a farmer for whom I had done some work, when he said, "the land has never forgot it." Under steam, the farmer is to a great extent independent of the weather, as he can take advan- tage of the favourable days to get his crops in with an expedition no number of horses can accomplish. The question still remains. What are farmers on clay lauds to do, with wages and other expenses double, a scarcity of hands, and men nothing like so efficient as formerly ? It is quite clear, however, that farming, like manufac- turing, to pay must be on a large scale, and to a great extent, by steam power. Small farmers must either combine to purchase and work steam tackle, or hire. I may mention that I have added to my steam force a traction engine for conveying dung to the fields, and carrying stones, wood, and other work on the estate, and with which you will see by the enclosed extract, that I have cut down and carted home corn. I hope to hear of the Carrick farmers taking up the question of steam cultivation. — Yours faithfully, Kixxaird. Sir W. M. Cuninghame, Bart., M.P,, Glenmoor, Maybole. \ 360 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. STEAM PLOUGHING. TO THE EDITOR OF THE MARK LANE EXPRESS. Sir, — I mucli prefer the plough to the cultivator as a weed killer and land airer, especially in hot, dry weather. "We know that in wet weather on stiff clays it must bg used, for the cultivator then cannot work. The loug 5-feet breasts of the plough have no under-soles to press down the soil, and uo horse treadings ; but the earth is lifted from its bed, hurried, twisted, and broken, aud dropped bottom upwards ; and it then lies so lightly and loosely, and unpressecl, that the sun's rays and drying winds enter freely, and parch the roots of weeds, from which the soil has been wrung or shaken. In fact, in dry, hot weather there is nothing equal to the steam ])lough for making a clean fallow. The cultivator moves and pushes aside the earth, and lets down the fine por- tions ; but it does not move or turnover all the earth, and all the weeds : scarifying should be used after the weeds have been uprooted aud dried by the plough. Of course the ploughmen want looking to, for as they are paid a sum ])er acre over and above their usual pay, there is an in- ducement to hurry the work, or omit to replace the worn or blunted shares by new ones. In hard, dry, tenacious claj s, the ploughs will come out of and slip over the soil unless the shares are sharp and the plough sufficiently weighted. In our case two or three men in addition to the plough stecrer were required on the plough ; they had to jump oft' occasionally where the engine was "pulled up" by the resisting clay, and we can imagine what the resistance must be to sto]) a 12-horse power engine work- ing at 125 to 150 lb. to the inch. In fact, steam plough- ing lays bare the shortcomings of the ordinary horse ])lough, where the ploughman has been obliged to " ease off" the work when the resistance was too great for his horses. After steam ploughing, the subsequent working of the land becomes, by comparison, a very easy affair. Commend me to the steam plough, and after that to cul- tivation. The steam plough economises greatly both horse and manual labour, and very much forwards the work of the farm. In hard, dry ground, plenty of steam plough shares should be provided, for some dozens per day are occasionally required. I look upon the contract sys- tem of steam ploughing as a great boon to British agri- culture. The extra few shillings per acre are as nothing when compared with the advantages gained, and I consi- der it a great mistake to try to depreciate it, for we get a strong fellow to do all the hard work, rendering the rest easy. Especially it is useful to those who have only a certain small number of horses which cannot be dispensed with. Farmers with little crooked fields and small gate- ways are unfavourably placed, and must expect to be left out in the cold when competing for hired steam with those whose lands are more acceptable to the contractors. Landowners should consider this, and remove the diifi- culties. Farmers are exposed to great competition as among themselves. The occupiers of undrained, ill- shaped and over-timbered fields, with bad roads and insufScient buildings, suffer tremendously in competition with their more fortunate neighbours. The buyer of wheat makes uo allowance for agricultural shortcomings. Your?, October 20^'/^ J. J. Mechi. MR. BRUCE'S SHORTHORNS.— Mr. John Cran, Kirk- ton, InTcrness, has bought the whole herd of Shorthorns belonging to Mr. Bruce, Burnside, Fochabers, consisting of twenty-two animals. THE LATE DUKE OF LEINSTER.— He was one of the original founders of the national system of education, and for many years acted as a Commissioner of the Board. He warmly supported the establishment of the Royal Agricultural Society in ISll, and filled the office.of President until December, 1857. During the presidency oi his Grace an incident occurred which threatened to upset the Society. During the famine years Mr. O'Connell became a member of the Society " for the purpose of using it to ' put the screw' on the Government. On his motion a resolution forbidding the discussion of political subjects was repealed al>er a long debate. The Duke, who was in the chair, imme- diately resigned, aa he saw that the effect of so radical a change would create dissention in a society which had hitherto com- bined all parlies for the good of the country, and that the effect w ould soon be to break it up altogether. His prompt and decisive action induced the members to retrace their steps, and the Society was saved." The Duke was also much interested in the prosperity of the Royal Dublin Society, and for many years was President of the Council. He was also President of the Royal Horticultural Society, and other public bodies of a non-political character. He was for over sixty years Grand Master of the Freemasons of Ireland, and in the Orphan School of that institution, and other charities connected with the Masonic body, he took a deep interest, As a landlord, his Grace was much respected by his tenants, among whom lie spent most part of his life. Affable and courteous in his deportment, he was at all times accessible to those who desired to bring their affairs under his notice, and in this he made no distinction between the humblest and the most important of his tenants. His private charities were large. He taught that singularly tortuous tributary of the Liffey, the Wrye, on entering tlie demesne, to expand into a broad river, and this again into a large and beautifid lake, the waters of which, conducted over an admirably constructed artificial, and, withal, most natural-looking cascade, again to take their natural course, and broadly flow for a long distance through woodland and rocky scenery of a very imposing cha- racter. At spots suitable for connecting the splendid drives on its north and south sides he spanned this river with stately and elaborately constructed stone bridges. The Duke was very fond of arboriculture, and many a fine breadth of planting now forms a lofty and enduring monument to his memory. Though practically not so much of a horticulturist, or taking as much of an active and personal interest in gardening as in its kindred pursuits. Carton gardens and grounds were always kept up in the finest condition. The beautiful and imposing Italian garden adjoining the mansion was his Grace's crea- tion, and formed at the cost of a great amount of labour and expense. For nearly forty years he was President of the Royal Horticultural Society — an office which he held to the close of his life. His habits were as active as they were sys- tematic. He was very fond of walking exercise, and few of his friends after taking a spin with him would care to repeat it. He conld handle the felling axe with the skUl of a back- woodsman, aud many an aspiring pine, lofty ash, and tough oak tottered with mathematical accuracy to the desired line of fall from the nicely-balanced swing and unerring strokes of his Grace's axe. He was most punctual in everything, and especially so in the matter of correspondence. No matter who had occasion to write to him, even the humblest applicant for his bounty, we doubt if ever, unless under most peculiar cir- cumstances, they had to wait much beyond the return post for a reply. We have heard it said that on occasions when his house was filled with company he always rose at five a.m., in order to dispose of his correspondence and other matters, and have thus time to give his undivided attention to his guests. His puctuality as regards payments v/as of a piece with that in respect of his correspondence and all other matters. Annui- ties, subscriptions to public bodies, charitable institutions, and they were not a few, had never to be applied for. The first day of the new year was never allowed to be anight old before tliey were discharged. Indeed it was one of the joys of his life to lie down each night conscious of owing no man any- thing but good will. — Irish Farmers' Gazette. A GOOD CROP. — There is a pear-tree in an orchard ad- joining the Crown Hotel, Stoke Ferr^, Norfolk, which has this year produced 160 pecks of fruit. THE FARMEK'S MAGAZINE* 361 FARMING I N WALES. THE PRIZE FARMS OF DENBTGUSHIRE AND FLINTSHIRE. The following is the report and awards for the best cultivated farms : To the Committee of the Denbighshire and Flintshire Agri- cultural Society. Gentlemen, — My inspection of the farms entered for your prizes commenced this year oa the 10th August, and terminated on the lith. I selected this period as being the most saitable for seeing the graia crops at their best and tlie stubbles at their worst. A good corn crop in a clean stubble is one of the best evidences of good farming. It is a certain testimony to the previous cultivation while under green crop, and aa equal guarantee of good " seeds" and of clean " permanent pasture" when the land is laid down to grass. Last year the corn crops were neither heavy nor clean, chiefly because the season was adverse. This year they are above the average, and the heaviest crops are on the best farmed land. Land is very honest, " Clean it well, feed it well, and work it well," and it will respond liberally to the treat- ment. All the farms I have inspected this year have good corn crops on them ; their green crops vary in character, as also do their seeds and pastures, but they are all under superior manage- ment. The first prize ii offered for "the farm not less in quan- tity than 150 acres, including all the land held, which is pro- perly subdivided with fences, and is in the neatest and best order, judicious draining, watercourses, roads, gates, stiles, farmyard, &c., included ; the arable land under the most ap- proved course of cropping, and also the grass land in the neatest and best condition, soil and situation considered. Of the four competing farms in this class I select that oc- cupied by Mr. John Roberts, Geinas House, Bodfari, as coming nearest to this description. It is the smallest of the four, and is not so compact or conveniently situated for the homestead as the others, being intersected by a railway, and having a large piece of land in the centre, on which the church and village stands ; but all is done that is possible to counteract these dis- advantages. Its extent is I765 acres, forty of it is moun- tain land, 35 being in pasture and 5 in clover ; 30 acres were in corn, 18 of it wheat and 12 oats. The wheat in one field of II acres was remarkably good, thick on the ground, and the straw bright and well headed ; in the other field of 7 acres there was some coltsfoot and a few annual weeds in the stubble, but the crop was a fuU average, and this was the only field to which any exception could be taken as regards cleanliness. The barley, lOj acres, was a full crop, with a good root of seeds under. First year's clover, mowed, 30 acres, very good. Man- gold wurtzel, 6 acres remarkably forward and well managed. Swede turnips, 6 acres, regular iu plant and growing fast. Potatoes, 2J acres, vigorous and clean. The pasture land lying near the homestead greatly improved by a dressing of bone manure, full of white clover, and free from all noxious weeds. The upland pasture very clean and sweet. The stock consisted of 200 breeding ewes and lambs, well suited in cha- racter to the high-lying land, 13 dairy cows of a very superior class, 16 heifers and 16 rearing calves, quite equal in quality, and 2 handsome pedigree buUs, 6 farm horses, 3 colts, and 8 pigs. The poultry yard and bee stands testified also to the at- tention of Mrs. Roberts, as also did the state of the dairy. The garden was neat, but not made as productive as it might be. Mr. Roberts says he uses about eight tons of bone and artificial ma- nures annually, and 50 tons of lime, applies all the liquid ma- nure of the homestead to his grass land, and ploughs under lurrow all the farmyard manure his stock makes ; and he claims to have made such permanent improvements as the eradication of 3,500 yards of old fences, and the planting and raising of 900 yards of new ditto. He has a very useful collection of farm implements, a fixed steam-engine, and a well-arranged farmyard and buildings. He is an enterprising man, and has evidently done his best to win, and he well deserves the prize. All the other claimants have made a great outlay in permanent improvements and in increasing the fertility of their soils. One has eradicated 1,850 yards of old fences on a farm of 227 acres, and has reclaimed upwards of five acres of land by grubbing up tree roots and filling up ditches, and has planted 628 yards of new fences. He also expends £100 per year iu bone-dust and artificial ma- nures, and all has been done so well that it has greatly improved the value of the occupation. Another, on a farm of 200 acres, has done even more work of a similar character, and has also made a new road of considerable length, re-formed a stack yard at great cost to reduce labour, built a stone wall 100 yards long, and expended a considerable sum on improvement of farm-house. He has also greatly improved the cultivation of one hall the farm, which was much uxliausied by ploughing and very foul when it came into his hands four years age, for all of which he deserves the highest commendation. He had one of the best fields of wheat 1 have seen this year. The third has gutted his farm of all its old fences, re-formed its fields into the most suitable size for convenience by planting nearly 6^ miles of new fences, his landlord giving quicks and providing substantial rail fences for their protection. He has also made many other improvements, and he must ultimately bring his farm into the prize list if he perseveres in the way he has commenced. Time, and sometimes a long period of time, is essential to substantial improvement of land and to its being made as productive and profitable as all good farmers desire. There is only one claimant for the Silver Medal of the Society, offered 10 owners and occupiers for the best farm under the same conditions, but 1 have no hesitancy in awarding it to the claimant. Major Hughes, of Ystrad. His farm is fast becoming a model larm, and after a more practical manner than attaches to most of those which go by this name. There is some extra expense incurred for ctppearance sake in the buildings near the hall, but the profit and loss sheet is evidently kept well under eye. The farm is a light dry soil and consists of 343 acres, divided into thirteen fields : 88 acres were in wheat, 33 oats, 25 turnips, 12 mangold wurzel, 2 cabbages, 2 vetches, 30 mowing, 95 clover, and 40 grass, pastured with cattle and sheep. All the crops were remarkably good except the tur- nips, which had utterly failed through the dry weather, but had been re-sown and were now making a fair start. The stock consisted of 9 farm horses, 24 dairy cows, 40 heifers and bullocks, and 24 calves. The milk of the cows is churned by steam power and made into butter, and from 24 to 30 calves are annually reared on the farm. The sheep flock consists of 250 breeding ewes, supplemented by about 200 wethers, bought in the autumn and sold out in the following spring, 6 breeding sows, and about 30 store pigs. House feeding is largely fol- lowed with the horned stock. All clover and vetches used green are passed through the chaff-cutter and mixed with brewer's grains, bean meal, oilcake, &c. No hay or straw sold. This system yields a large quantity of manure, and places it where it can be most economically and advantageously dealt with. All the field labour, both team work and manual, is done by the piece, and a bonus is given for success in rearing lambs, poultry, &c. This system is worthy of more thought from farmers than it yet obtains. Wherever it can be applied it must be the fairest way of rewarding skill and industry in the labourer, and ol stimulating and sustaining him in his efforts to rise both socially and morally, and by adopting it the farmer must get equal value in labour for his wages, and have his work done more quickly and equally well with proper supervision. Major Hughes says the plan works admirably, but he combines the practical with the theoretical on his farm more than most men, and carries out his plans with all the system and discipline of a soldier. His farming must have a beneficial influence in the neighbourhood, in showing both what can be done and how to do it. For Premium 8, " Farms over 80 acres but under 150," there is no claimant ; and for Premium 9, " Farms over 50 acres and under 80," only one — Mr. Edwards, the Brewery, Ruthin. His farm is situate about a mile from the town, and contains 52 acres, lying compactly together round the home- stead. Since entering upon it last year, under lease, he has drained 6 acres, eradicated 125 yards old fences, marled II acres, repaired the occupation road and footpaths, which were A A 362 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE in a neglected state, and set up and fixed 13 gates. He lias also had a large fall of timber made since entering on the fann, in accordance with agreement made with the landlurd, and the place, it is evident, is already greatly improved iu appear- ance and value by these works. His barley (10 acres) was an average crop. Beans (3 acres) a light crop. Turnips (i^ acres) patchy in places, through the ravages of the beetle grub. Potatoes (2 acres) very healthy looking, and all the laud clean and well cultivated. The pasture land (21 acres) had been much improved by draining and the application of marl and manure, and the clover (9 acres) was very good. The hedges had all been cut in and properly laid, so as to make good fences in a year or two with proper care. The stock (20 cattle, 20 sheep, and 8 pigs) were of suitable character, and the whole occupation was in commendable order. Thomas Kigby, Inspector. At Llanboidy Mr. Pugh, without trespassing on the province of the judges,' might say that splendid specimens of the black breed were shown that day, and he believed that henceforth Llanboidy would be known as the home of the blacks. They were now establishing a Herd-book of the stock and he hoped they would tnke an interest in it ; it would be a thousand pities to let such a splendid lot go by. " The proof of the pudding was in tiie eating," and he believed that the black breed would produce as nice a bit of beef as could be vFished. For himself, he was fond of a bit of colour, and did a little in the way of Shorthorn. In his opinion everv man should be allowed to do as he thought best, only he ought to try and keep the breed pare ; he certainly thought there was something in that. They ought to thoronghlv understand breeding. With regard to horses, tlipy had a really splendid show that day. In a book he got hold of a short time ago it was stated, with regard to horses, that if a thorou?h-bred mare was put to a common horse, ever afterwards she lost her excellence, and would never breed racers again. This, he believed, was said to be the case not only with horses, 'but with other animals. Suppose, for instance, a man had a splendid Shorthorn cow worth, perhaps, £500 or a thousand pounds, not much in these days, and she came across a £10 black bull, then according to his doctrine she would never again breed anything worth having. He did not sav that this doctrine was true, but it was worth some consideration ; in the meantime he would ask them to take care of their fences, and let those who had good animals try to keep them up. The Rev. Mr. Morgan was very happy to find that a new feature had been added to this Society— an hortisultural show. About four years since he paid a visit to North Wales, and noticed that the houses of the labouring classes, especially those employed at the Peurhyn quarries, were extraordinarily clean. On inquiring the cause of this, and how it was that the gardens were so well kept, he found that Lord Penrhyn encouraged the cottagers to keep their houses clean and tidy by giving prizes. He had not the least doubt that this new feature of the agricultural society— the horticultural society- would be of much use and benefit in the future. Mr. Lewis (Gurrey), oue of the judges of the cattle, said that Mr. Ormond and himself had had a very dillicult task to perform, particularly with regard to the black cattle. He had heard a great deal about the Llanboidy show, but had never had the pleasure of attending it before that day. The black cattle exhibited in the yard he would have been glad to posses when he was farming, and the two-year-old heifers formed a stock which no man need be ashamed to own. In speakin°- thus he did not refer to the two-year-olds more than the reraMuder of the blacks, for Mr. Ormond and himself recom- mended the whole of the classes as good. When he (Mr Lewis) did more farming he kept to the black cattle, but since he had retired he had been trying other breeds— Shorthorns Ayrshires, and many others; but of oue thing he was certain' that he had found nothing to equal the black for a dairy cow' Mrs. Lewis had said to him the other day, " If you are going to let me have a few cows, let me have good ones," and although he had tried other breeds, he was now going to fall back upon the black breed. He had tried an experiment with each cow, separately, with the aid of a lactometer, an instrument he would recommend ' them all to procure, and then they would be able to see what ' difference there was iu the qnality of the milk. By not refer- ' ring to the quality of the milk, it was impossible to know i what the value of the produce of the cow was. lie could not ' speak highly of the coloured cattle in the yard. He hardly expected to see good coloured cattle, for they were not in the same position as his neighbour, Mr. Pugh, who could buy some of the best pedigree stock in England. In his opiniou more prizes ought to be given for the stock shown. Mr. James (Haverfordwest), one of the judges for the horses, they said when asked him to act he had no idea there would be such a good show. He was afraid their patience had been tried in the horse show, but the various classes were so good that the judges really could not decide. The yearling colts and the two-year-old hunters were especially good. Mr. GiBBY (Copy Bush) referred more particularly to the sheep, which were extraordinarily good. In the district from whence he came the Llanboidy sheep had always had a good character. When he went home he should be able to tell the farmers that in the future they need not go to Shropshire or Wiltshire for sheep, and he should advise them to go to Llanboidy where they could get animals of sound constitution well worth the attention of any man. He had some sheep which he should be hnppy to exhibit in any show but Llan- boidy ; he could not bring them there, for he was certain he should be beatn. He had no doubt that once he got back the farmers in his di.'.trict would never go anywhere else for their auimals hut to Llanboidy. He could not say so much for the pigs ; the long-eared sows and the short-eared sows were very good, but the boars ought to be much better. Pig-breeding, if properly carried out, was not a small item iu the profi.ts of a farmer. He found the Berkshire breed the most profitable, and believed, if they gave it a trial, they would find so too. Iu the course of a few years they would have to come to Llanboidy for the best things in the country. Mr. Or.moxd (Wedlock) said it was the .first time he had ever acted as judge at Llanboidy, and he was really surprised at the show of sheep ; it was first-class. The boars were not up to the mark, and some ought not to have come into the yard at all. The sows, however, were very good. Mr. Thomas (Derllys) said some years ago it was enough to bring an ordinary animal and take the prize ; but now the horses must be brought in good condition, reared well from the time they were foaled. It was the same with sheep and cattle ; it' they did not bring good things they had no chance of winning at Llanboidy. The sheep were, as the judges had remarked, first-class, and they were getting better. Three or four years ago they never saw a sheep trimmed ; now he pro- posed that the Society should offer a prize for the sheep that was best trimmed. Next year he himself intended offering a prize of one sovereign for the best trimmed sheep in the yard. Mr. Buckley, the Vice-chjiirman, ssid this was the first exhibition of this soeiety at Llanboidy that he had yet attended. Agricultural shows of this kiad were very interest- ing to him, as farming had always been one of his hobbies. The stock ahown at their show was well worth looking at. He had kept a large quantity of Shropshire sheep, aud had bought [some at Mr. Preece's sale in Shropshire, but in his opinion the shet p exhibited in the yard to-day were as good as those, and were quite fttto go to Shropshire, and cut a very respectable figure there. Mr. Powell, the Secretary, said with all the improvement which societies such as these created between landlord and tenant, aud with'rill the improvements made in stock, there was yet oue class which had not changed for the better in this country. The class to which he alluded was one of the most important to the farmer, without which he would not be able to cairy out his affairs ; he meant the labouring class, the most helpless and dependent of any class in the county. As long as health and strength and work remains everything was right, but let sickness or old age come on, the whole machinery was put out of gear, and he had to depend upon the charity of others, or to tender mercies of a board of guardians. To provide against that there had been established in this county — in fact, in the three counties — a society which he hoped would better the class to which he referred. He would no lurtliir detain them on this point, but would earnestly beg and entreat the serious attention of all farmers to this society. He was sure that if they once put it to their hearts they would give it their warmest support. The presi- dent of this meeting-, and the vice-president also, had allowed their names to be added to the list of .trustees, and they were also liberal supporters of the scheme. He believed that the Society would do a vast amount of good ; it would enable the labouring man to provide for sickness and old age, lay by an THE FARMER' 8 MAGAZINE. 36: annuity for himself or his cliildren, and make provision for death. He was happy to say that BIr. Buckley had undei taken to occupy the chair at a meeting to be held at St. Clears. Mr. Buckley said, as Mr. Powell meutioued his name in connection with this Friendly Society, he would like to make a few remarks ou the matter. He had put his shoulder to the wheel in connection with it, because he thought it would be a most excellent thing for the labouring classes. The labourer of this part of the country, as far as he could judge, seemed to be pretty comfortable, but the thought must sometimes occur to iiira, " What will become of ray wife and family if I am overtaken by illness ? we have nothing but the workhouse before us." That was a very gloomy thought, and must hang continaally like a cloud over the labourers' mind. He (Mr. Buckley) had taken the opportunity to speak on this subject, because most of the gentlemen present had it in tlieir power to help forward this great Society, for the three counties. He believed this Society was a most admirable one, and one that would work an immense amount of good. He should like to mention what he considered a serious omission in the pro- ceedings. No notice had been taken of the beautiful llower show, under the teut in the fteld near the school, which had been got up at very considerable labour and expense. The wonder was how such a show could have been brought togetlier, and he was sure the visitors would have been more numerous, had not the weather militated so much azaiust it. The fruit show was very fine, and was much to the commen- dation of the neighbourhood. There were also some beautiful flowers, and the cottagers' exhibits of wild flower devices were really so beautiful, and so tastefully got up, that they excited the admiration of all present, who were best able to form an opinion on such things. Mr. Thomas, the secretary of the United Counties Friendly Benefit Society, said, long before this Society was commenced, he had thought of something of the kind. The time for talking about it was now gone by, the time for action had arrived, and tiiey were now working in right earnest. Still everything could not be completed at once ; the work was being done as fast as possible, and a good deal of necessary routine matter had been completed. He had visited Cardigan in the course of the week for the purpose of establishing a branch there, and he was glad to say the Society would meet with a good rece])tion in the town of Cardigan. He was surprised to find that in that town there was only one society, a branch of the Odd-fellows, and a small club. This fact would serve to show the great need there was in three coun- ties for a society of the kind they were establishing, and he had no doubt it would work its way in a short tim?. At Carmarihen, Mr. PtGU, the High Sheriff, expressed his great satisfaction with the show as a whole ; the blacks, the horses, and the sheep w^re all first rate. He read a short extract from louatt on breeding, which set forth the danger that lay, in using a poor stallion with a good mare, of ruining that mare for ever, and making her quite unfit even if the best stallion obtainable were afterwards used, to give a pure racer. He had referred to this fact at Llaiiboidy, and now gave them the exact words of the writer he quoted. He strongly urged them all to keep to pure blood. Lord Emlyn, the Chairman, desired to say a few words on some important subjects which interested them, and this without entrenching on the rule of the Society. A question greatly afi'ecting agriculture, which had been the subject of considerable controversy and discussion, and the cause of annoyance and diificulty in this county, it was proposed to deal with by Act of Parliament last Session. This had not been done. Now, before blaming tiie Government for not bringing forward the subject, they had to remember the circumstances under which they came into power. Whoever deserved blame for the present Governmcut not coming into power soouer it certainly was not the Government themselves, and it would, therefore, be unfair to blame them. They had no recess in which to prepare their important plans, and nothing had been done last session in this matter. Mention, however, of such a bill might be looked for ou the House re-assembling. There could be but little difference of opinion as to tiie necessity of some such measure as he referred to ; of course, he spoke of a measure for in some way allowing the tenant the benefit of unexhausted improvements. He hoped that before they met here again on the occasion of the annual show that some measure of that kind will have been passed by Parliament. The concessions that had been made by the budget in the relief of a farmer from various imposts could not but be gra- tifjing to them ; they were, besides, promised a consideration of the whole question of Local Taxation next session. Mr. Jokes, M.P., congratulated the Society on the show held that day and the excellence of the cattle, reminding the farmers ot the great value there was in the rearing of Here- fords, which he should like to see spread more over the country than was the case. He referred briefly to the capa- bilities of the country for cattle breeding and came then to speak of matters parliamentary. This last session the Govern- ment had been blamed for making it uninteresting ; it might have heen uuinteresting to those who were bound up in the sensational legislation of the times which had gone before ; but it could nut be said with truth, that there had been little doing to advance the interests of the country ; that had indeed been asserted, but the complaint was not founded on any correct estimate of what had been accomplished, as he be- lieved could be proved by a few words. The expense of lunatic paupers to the local ratepayers had been very much lessened ; tlie tax on agricultural horses had been abolished — a great and undoubted boon to the farmers, which he hoped would be followed before long by the removal of the tax ou sheep dogs as well. The consideration of the whole question of Local Taxation would be a prominent work of the next session. There was an undue preponderance of the rates he thought falling on the land. As to the lessening of the Income-tax, he was of opinion that Schedule D was the only one as to which (here was just ground for complaint ; were Schedule D modified, he would not object to the rate, nor to seeing it one levied at 6d. in the £. At Tarpoley, Mr. Tollemache, JLP., believed, on the whole, they might congratulate themselves on their agricul- tural prospects this year. During the spring he was engaged in London, but if he had been down in Cheshire during the very dry weather which then prevailed, he feared he would have availed himself of the truly British privilege of grumbling. But matters afterwards turned out better than we thought, and we knew there had been a very good harvest throughout the country. In Suffolk the wheat crop had been most ex- cellent, and he believed it was also very good in Cheshire. Barley was good, and the potatoes very promising. We might, he feared, be rather short of hay, but he hoped v\ c should not have a severe winter. We had plenty of grass at present, stock was generally healthy, and if proper precautionary measures were used we might continue to remain in the same satisfactory condition. Some years ago his father tried an interesting experiment, which perhaps Mr. lligby and others would remember ; he had two yearling heifers vaccinated after which he sent thein to stand for some weeks between animals affected with pleuro-pneumonia. Notwithstanding their proximity to the infected animals the heifers returned home perfectly sound, and although he knew there were great differences of opinion on the subject of vaccination, still he could not help feeling that if vaccination received a fair trial it migiit prove an effectual safeguard. He had re- ferred to the harvest m Suffolk. In the west the wheat crop might not be so pleutilul, but at the same time they had not shared the dilficulties there which the east had with regard to labour. ALhough not a single labourer ou his father's Suffolk estatejoined the Uuion, there was no doubt whatev .that there was a better feeling between employer and employed, and he trusted that the warning they had from their Eastern Counties friends might not be lost upon them. He hoped employers would show increasing forbearance, ioresight, and kindness in relation to the employed, and thus establish a permanent bond of union between them. Sir Philip Grey EGEiiiOA', M.P., dared say that some of his friends who saw him scrambling about in the vales, endeavour- ing to put salt ou partridges' tails, thought he might be better at home instead of idling his time away like that, and perhaps they might be right in one sense ; but while he was rambling across the country in search of wild partridges, endeavouring to put salt on their tails, he was also taking care that no one should put salt ou his tail. He read a story in his youth, " Eyes and no eyes," which materially helped to induce in him the habit, whether hunting, shooting, or walking about, of using his eyes ; and though ostensibly in search of sport, he had opportunities of seeing what lie could not see otlierwise. He thought he could tell them where to find a field of docks and rushes, or a field of good white clover ; and he not only A A 2 364 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. knew tbe field, but the farm where it was. Of course he went into every field, because if he missed one he might miss a covey of birds. He thought he kaew, too, every ditch that wanted cleaning out and every gaie that wanted repairs — and he might tell them that whenever he found a gate tied with a withy he always cut it. It was a slovenly, idle plan wliicli he could not endure. If he were a farmer he would never go out without a small hammer and a few nails iu his pocket. As a geologist he had been accus- tomed to carry a hammer, and he was quite sure he had often carried more fossils than the weight of a few nails would be. One nail might help to make up a gap, or save a gate, which it would cost a good deal to repair afterwards. Therefore he did not devote liiniself entirely to sporting, but took note of what he saw, and remembered it too, and perhaps his neigh- bours might hear of it some day or other. He knew fields which would he very much advantaged by draining, and he knew fields where there was as fine grass aud clover as anyone could wish to see. Tlien the search for sport gave him an opportunity of seeing what damage was done by hares and rabbits, so that he could give his keppers instructions respect- injt them ; also the opportunity of seeing what trees were killing the fences, and which should be removed, and he took note of that. He could also see what mischief bad been done by the hounds in the previous season, aud without taking that for granted, lie could see where wires had been run through fences, and assured them that if an accident happened as the consequence of that, and he were on the jury, he would never quit it until a verdict of wilful murder had been returned. All these matters lie might tell them in confidence came before him in walking across country, and he did not trust to one pair of eyes, for his friend Mr. Beckett, who was fond of sporting, generally went with him. And he would say this much, while upon what he had seen, that the general eS'ect of what he had seen was highly satisfactory, aud he did not think there was any county in England where agriculture was more extensively and judiciously carried out than it had been in this for the last few years. With reference to the present season, thougli they had had a very serious drought — and when he went afloat in Lord Ducie's yacht, he felt very downhearted at the prospect — he never in his life had seen such fine crops, such splendid pastures and clover, as he had seen this season ; and if it was only open wheather this side of Christmas, he thought the deficiency of the hay harvest would not be felt. He thought proof of what he had been saying was afforded in the condition of the animals exhibited, for he had never seen finer, and he trusted the show would continue to be what it was, one of the best local shows in the county. Mr. ToMKiNSON, the chairman, congratulated them upon the prosperous season they had passed. In Leicestershire and other counties they had suffered more than iu Cheshire, for which we here had reason to be thankful. Lastly, he con- gratulated them upon the absence of those differences between employers and employed which culminated in the disastrous strike in the Eastern Counties, and which so embittered the mutual relations which previously existed between the various classes of society. Mr. FiNCHETT, in responding for the " Successful Exhi- bitors" strongly condemned the practice of over-feeding, and thought the most fastidious could not find fault with the stock exhibited at the Tarporley show. As an exhibitor of cattle, he gave it as his opinion that the pure-bred Shorthorn was not the best adapted for dairy purposes ; at the same time he would advise every farmer to purchase a thorough-bred bull as a crop to the stocks now kept in Cheshire ; the progeny of this crop if not good milkers were much improved for feeders — a fact not to be lost sight of in these days of dear beef. At Ruthin, Major Cor:nwallis West, the chaiiman, had often heard it asked among his friends, " Do these societies do any good to the small Welsh farmers ?" That was the ques- tion 'Jot them to decide. If they did not, he would say let them try to make such an alteration that the small farmers could compete in separate classes, and not oblige them to com- pete against the tenants of large farms, who possessed nearly the same advantages as landed proprietors. The importance of agricultural pursuits was growing with the question. How shall we provide for the increasing population of the country ? Thank God we had a harvest this year the yield of which had been almost unprecedented, nqt only in this country but in ra nee, and it would be an immense gain to the people. What did it mean ? It meant that this year we should not be obliged to purchase so much corn as we should have had to purchase otherwise ; in fact, we should have to purchase two million quarters less, which represents a sum of £12,000,000 that will go into the pockets of the working men of this country. He hoped that they would be the better off for it, that they would at least indulge themselves, their wives and children, in some harmless luxuries, instead of spending their money upon an article the sale of which was becoming an increasing item in the revenue of the Chancellor of the Ex- chequer, he meant the consumption of spirits, for which a sum of £15,000,000 was spent last year. He would not attempt au amateur lecture on farming, for it would be absurd to do so, but he might observe that, owing to the fickleness of our climate in a great measure, no positive rules could be laid down in regard to successful agriculture. Next to the climate, it depended so much upon the industry, ability, and intellect of the farmer. They could not say what crops should be grown in a particular district, and whether a farm should be large or small. It was ridiculous to suppose that in mountainous districts people could be found with capital who would take a farm of any size. He recollected a friend of his said he was farming on a large scale, and, when asked how many fields, he said, "Only three." Well, thit did not sound like a large farm, but he explained that the fields were 600 acres each. It would be absurd to have such farms as that in Wales. He congratulated them upon the absence of such disturhances as had taken place in the Eastern Counties. He believed that the labouring classes in those parts were better paid, more contented, that they had nothing to fear on their part that there would be any such rising. Let it not be supposed that he was saying a word against the right of any labouring man to better his condition, if he could do so. What he deprecated was the interference of those lo4uacious emissaries who went about setting class against class. But at the same time — and in that his friend Mr. Scott-Bankes could bear hira out — all who knew anything of the frightfully-abject condition of the labourers in the south must admit that they had a right to do what they did. Speaking next of the tenure of farms, he thought it of so much importance that he had offered a trifling prize for the best agreement, and no doubt upon that a few remarks would be made by Mr. Sandbach, and, as Mr. Osborne Morgan would have to speak to the toast, he (the speaker) ventured to express the hope that the Legislature would do nothing but what was fair and just in regard to contracts which should bind landlord and tenant. He would not pro- long his speech except to say that he believed the general condi- tion of that part of Wales was improving, for the last statistics issued showed that the rates were diminished, and that there were fewer paupers than in any other district of the United Kingdom. He was delighted with the change which had been made in regard to the dinner, as it had resulted in such a large assemblage as he saw before him, landlords and tenants, and their wives and daughters, sitting down together irrespective of differences upon political and other matters. He hoped that would still be the case. Mr. H. R. Sandbach, for the judges, speaking of the farm agreements which had been sent in to compete for the Pre- sident's prize, said that one thing which struck them was the extreme variety, each differing from the other. He did not think any two were the same as to the period of entry, and with regard to the one which they thought to be decidedly the best, there were two points upon which he wished to make some remarks. They considered the science of agri- culture a progressive one, and thought, therefore, that the tenant should not be obliged to observe one stereotyped method of farming, as that would bar his progress. The fewer restrictions placed upon the tenant the better, until the period when he had notice to quit, and then it was necessary to protect the interests of the landlord, as between out-going and in-coming tenant. The agreement to which the prize was awarded was that signed by Mr. Jones, of Aberystwith, but in that they thought the notice to quit was too short : it was six months, and it should be twelve months. The other point was as to the cartage which the tenant engaged to do for the landlord. A blank was left in the agreement, but a note suggested that the tenant should do a day's carting for every £20. They thought that a day's carting for every £40 would be sufficient. He mentioned those two points because the Society would wish probably to obtain all the benefit they could from the publication of the agreements. The date of THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 365 entry was the 29th of September, one not very usual, but that was not of much consequence, providing it could be made to coincide with the entry of the iu-coming tenant. The con- dition was that the whole crop being then on the land the landlord should have the option of taking it at a valuation. Tiie 2nd of February, the 25th of March, and 25th of November, were amoug the dates of entry which they met with in the other agreenieuts. Mr. OsBOKME Morgan, M.f., had lived amongst Welsh farmers from childhood, and had often noticed the kindly relations which existed between the farmers and labourers of Wales. He did not think there was another part of tiie kingdom in which tliere was such a kindly understanding as in tliat part. In a letter to The Times a correspondent had adverted to the fact, and it was supported by his own ex- perience, that the same was the case between landlords and tenants ; and he could not help thinking that one of the chief objects, and one of the chief uses of meetings like that — of course the first object was to encourage agriculture — was to promote friendly feeling between landlord and tenant, to make the landlord something more than a mere receiver of rent, and the farmer something more than a mere producing machine. At AVelshpool, Mr. Hanbury Tracy, M.P., thought that the state and prosperity of the country was a matter of congra- tulation. As to the show, they were also to be congratulated on the many excellent productions it contained, but he re- gretted that there was no competition for implements. Had there been, the show in that department would have been much larger, and he certainly should have been pleased with a larger show of implements, because the present and future welfare of agriculture depended almost entirely upon them. But machinery was daily progressing and creeping into places where it was never seen before, inasmuch as farmers were seeing the necessity of it. They had had a serious strike of agricultural labourers in the country, but it had not come to their county, because both farmers and labourers work well together. He thought that strike had shown one or two things, and one of those things was that where they had a fixed rent to pay, the wages ought to be fixed also, if they had to keep up a certaiu number of labourers all the year. Farmers might be able to pay higher wages with a smaller number of labourers, but they must be skilled labourers. The introduction of machinery was, as it had ever been, the result of strikes, and there could be no doubt that machinery was gradually fiadiug its way into agriculture, from the steam harrow to the steam thrasher. He and his colleages were well aware that they had gone ahead in Mont- gomeryshiie with machinery, some of which, it must be con- fessed, was very unpopular ; and he need scarcely tell them that he alluded to that very unpopular specimen of it — the Forden traction engine. There had been no end of correspondence on this subject, and complaints of the nuisance the engine was, but I'l,'" all that he or Mr. Wynn could do, as yet, the Forden traction engine was still on the road. A bill was introduced into Parliament too late last session to be of any use to remedy these nuisances, and it fell to the ground. He might be allowed to remark, in closing, that he believed machinery was re-organising and settling the question of labour more effectually than any strikes ever could do. Mr. W. W. Wynn, M.P., the chairman, thought the county could not support three or four societies of the kind, and for that reason he advocated concentrated support. Machynlleth had one for a short time, but it fell through, and the Llangollen society could not hold its meeting this year, and was languish- ing for want of pecuniary assistance. He could not think that so many societies could offer prizes worth competing for. He hoped they would become a circulating Society, and then they could support one good one. These things may not be palatable ; but as president of the society he thought they were wholesome truths that it was his duty to tell them. He was sure the two larger towns of Newtown and Welshpool would know that in doing what he had he had done what he could for the best. He hoped, in settling the show of 1876, they would be actuated by the liberal feeling of give and take, and see whether it would not be well to try one of the other smaller towns next year. He thought, on the whole, and considering the drawbacks to which he had adverted, that the show this year had been a tolerably successful one. Amongst the ponies, from 11 to 14< hands, he saw nothing worth looking at. There was room for a good deal of improvement in the cobs, and he thought a large quantity of grass land in that county could be profitably used in rearing good ones. Prices for this class of horses were very high. Ponies that he could have bought 20 years ago for £20 to £25, were now fetching with ease £50. But of all the stock that in his opinion paid well, he thought nothing could equal their Mont- gomeryshire waggon horses, and every colt that a farmer bred from these horses was a good bank-note in his pocket. Mr. Alderman Withy, the President, did not seem to take a very flattering view of the show, but it should be borne in mind what a bad season — from the long drought — it had been for cattle. In fact, it was doubted at one time whether they should have a show at all. They had certainly a larger number in some classes than last year, but there were some splendid sheep and cattle in the show for all that. At Penybont, Radnorshire, the Hon. A. Walsh, M.P., said measures were passed during the last session for reducing lociil taxation, for which he believed that next year all ratepayers would feel the benefit. There was besides the repeal of the duty on horses, and he did not know any class who would be more benefited by that measure than farmers in the grazing districts, whether of cattle or of sheep, because it was a neces- sity for the farmer to have a horse to ride over his farm, and to look after and herd his sheep ; in fact, in those mountainous districts it would be impossible lor a sheep farmer to carry on his business without. They were as much a beast of labour as the cart horses. The rates had been lightened also by the rating of plantations, game, and mines, although — and he wished there were more mines in the county — he feared that rating of mines would not so much benefit the ratepayers of Radnorshire as it would those of some other counties. He believed that from the sources he had mentioned there would be a great alleviation in the rates next year. There would be many questions that would have to come before Parliament next session in the interest of the farmer, but he would forbear to enter into them, not wishing to disturb the serenity of the company. They would entail many questions which could not be mooted in an unpolitical spirit, and therefore he would not go into them. Turning to the subject of the show, he must remark with pleasure on the increased attendance over last year, and he was told by competent judges that the show gene- rally that day was very good indeed. He must say, however, that he should like to see a little more competition. He knew that the committee had very great difficulties to contend with, because it was hard to draw a line between the different dis- tricts to compete one with the other. It was quite ridiculous to say that farmers from the Valley of the Wye, from whence the chief winner that day— a personal friend of his, though not a political one— had come, could compete on equal terras with the higher portions of the country and those farmers whose lands were not so valuable by nature, but he did hope that the committee, having the advantage of practical men to guide them, would be able gradually to institute different prizes for those districts, so that they would be able to see the hard- working farmer who worked for his livelihood, and spent his whole capital ou one of the less favoured farms, competing for and receiving the best rewards for the most meritorious ani- mals. It could hardly be supposed that an association only two years old should be brought to perfection in that time, and he had no doubt that every succeeding year would bring a fresh stimulus to it. So long as the farmers supported it, so long would the gentry do so, and they would all go hand in hand in trying to keep the association on its legs, totally irrespective of politics, and with a view to increasing the value of the stock on the farms in the county. The Radnorshire Company had this year given a prize for turnips, and he under- stood it was the intention of Mr. Price, of the Mill, to give next year a £5 cup, because they must all remember how much the cattle depended for their winter feeding upon those and other roots. They must, therefore, give their attention, not only to the best breed of animals, which might fail for want of subsistence, but also attend to the feeding of the same. He should therefore like to see, another year, additional prizes given for roots. Mr. Severne, the chairman, said one of its most in- teresting parts had been the trial of sheep dogs ; and, apropos of them, he must say he should certainly like to see the tax upon such dogs removed. Mr. Walsh was iu Parliament he believed when that tax was put on, but he then represented I Leominster, where the people did not care for those dogs, and 366 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. perhaps would rather have the tax levied upou them. As for any reductions of taxation he believed that those reductions were suggested by the permanent officials of the Inland Uevenue and adopted by whatever party might be in power, so that noparty was responsible. Asahumhleindividual hisopinion UDon the subject was powerless, but as the president of the E.Hdiiorshire Asjricultural Society his voice perhaps might have s jme weight, and lie must say that a more shameful tax than that upon sheep-dogs was never imposed. He did not think that a farmer ought to keep a dog or starving curs to run all over the country and bark about the neighbouring houses at night, but it might be left to the magistrates to say how many sheep-dogs were required on each farm. No doubt Mr. Walsh vrould take crjtiit for his friends the present Government, and to a certain extent they were his (the Chairman's) friends too, though he was no party politician, for having removed the tax upon horses, but in his (the Chairman's) opinion they ought rather to have taken off the tax upon sheep-dogs, and put them on the same footing as sporting dogs. The tax upon sheep dogs he considered ought far more to have been removed than that upon horses, and he was satisfied tliat the present anoma- lous state of things upon the subject could not long continue. The tax was in fact equivalent to a tax upon a man's tools of trade. As for tlie Radnorshire Agricultural Society, he thought they had placed it upon such a basis that it would be an institution of the country. Soon after it was founded, Mr. Dansey Price had communicated to the secretary that a gen- tleman would give £600 towards it, provided that it was to be moveable to Knighton and Presteign. The founders of it had, however, invested their money upon the principle of its being held in a central positional Penybont,and to that effect a reply had been sent to Mr. Dansey Price. He was sorry to say that the gentleman who offered the £500, and who appeared to be a well-wisher to KaUnorshire, was very much hurt at the reply. The committee were unable to ascertain who that gentleman was. Mr. D.vNSEY l^RicE, in returning thanks on behalf of " the unknown gentleman" who was a well-wisher to the interests of the Society, said he was excessively pleased to see how much the Society was progressing and promised to report to his unknown friend accordingly. The offer, as the Chairman well knew, was a bona Jide one. It might, he thought, be modified in any way to suu the feelings and wishes of the Society, and was one that would, he was sure, if accepted be the means of making the Society a permanent institution of the country. It must not be omitted that in asking for the Society to be onsidered a county association they were giving up the meetings tluit were held at present at Knighton, Presteign and Wye-side. What his unknown friend proposed was to make the Society to a certain extent migratory. He dared say, however, the offer might be modified, and iliat the gentleman would not wish to make a hard and fast bargain. If the Society Cdrried out the object it was endeavouring to do — namely, to g^t the proprietors of both the upper and lower districts to send their cattle to one show, and could afford both like aivantages, so as to please all parties, it would be doing what a county society ought to do — namely, improving every part of tlie county from one end to the other, and especially those districts which most required improvement. He hoped the Society would try to come to an agreement with his un- known friend, and so try to put the Radnorshire Agricultural Society on a firmer basis than ever it had a chance ot being before. Mr. W. Hawkins (Weston), a judge, had been at two or three other shows this season, but he did not know that in the cart-iiorse classes he had seen better horses at any of them. They were good enough to be shown at any exhibition in England. In fact he had never seen better in his life. Mr. W. Ball (Kington) confirmed Mr. Hawkins' remark. Although he knew the county well, he was certainly very much aston»ihed to see the horses exhibited that day, and he must comphment the gentlemen of the upper part of the county on the class of cart horses they had produced. He wished he could say the same of the other classes. Mr. P. Rogers (Coxall) thought in some classes the stock shown last year was uetirr thau mat wliicii he aud. Mr. Evaus had been called on to judge that day. He thought that another year it would be well for the committee to get other than Herefordshire men to act as judges, although some of r hem were Radnorshire men ; he was himself ibr one, and he still thought there was not a better county in all England Still it was better that in some classes — the mountain sheep- especially, which were very important stock in Radnorshire — there should be gentlemen of greater experience of them than Herefordshire men to judge of their merits. The Hon. A. Walsu, M.P., explained that there was no man in Radnorshire had a greater hatred to the tax on sheep dogs than himself, as he thouglit it was a most unjust tax, and he was fully prepared in that session, if no one else had done it, to move that that tax should be abolished, but the Chan- cellor of the Exchequer, in introducing his Bunget, stated that next year he would hand over the tax on sheep-dogs to rate- payers, for them to do what they thought fit with it; and, therefore he (the Hon. A. Walsh) and other members who re - presented feeding and sheep breeding counties determined to wait until next session, to see if he (the Chancellor) would redeem his promise. If he did not, then they would bring forward a motion upon the subject, and would fight it to the last. TOLL ON STEAM AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS — A case came on at the Steyning Petty Session in which George Woolgar, of the Bramber Turnpike Gate, summoned the Penshurst and Chiddingstone Agricultural Steam Company (Limited) for refusing to pay toll in respect of two steam road locomotive engines, containing within themselves (using the words of the Act) the machinery for their own propulsion, together with certain carriages or implements annexed thereto. Mr. Lamb, of Brighton, appeared for the toll-gate keeper and Mr. Goodman, also of Brighton, appeared for the Com- pany. Mr. Lamb opened the case for the prosecution 6y putting in the Local Act obtained in the year 1860 by the trustees of the Bramber-road, in which certain tolls were authorised to be taken in respect of agricultural road steam engines and carriages drawn by them. Mr. Lamb also referred to what is generally termed the " Locomotive Act, 1871," by which it is enacted that all clauses and provisions of any Local Act relating to turnpike roads shall apply to locomotives so as to render the owners liable (notwithstanding the General Act may have been passed subsequently to the Local Act) to those tolls specified in such Local Act. It should be stated that in the General Act referred to tolls are authorised to be taken by trustees of local turnpike roads, as follows: " Such a toll for every two tons weight that the locomotive shall weigh, as shall be equal to the toll by the Local Act made payable for every horse drawing any waggon, &c., with wheels of a width similar to those of the locomotive." Mr. Lamb then called the gate- keeper to prove the passing through the gate, on the 10th ult., of the two locomotives, attached to one of which was a van used for sleeping purposes by the men, but admitted not to be for agricultural purposes. Mr. Lamb also put in the Acts of Parliament relating to exemptions from toll, which were afterwards referred to argumentatively by Mr. Goodman, as will be seen below. This was stated to be the case for the complainant, with the exception of a point raised by Mr. Lamb as to whether a contract ibr ploughing land could be consi- dered as a hiring of the implements by the person contracting. On this point tlie magistrates expressed an opinion, as it did not immediately arise. Mr. Goodman then addressed the Court in an able manner on the part of the defendants. He contended (citing several cases in support) that the mere fact of a person contracting with another to do certain work did not make the one who engaged the other a hirer in respect of the articles and goods employed in carrying out the contract, for inasmuch as uo action of trover in this case could have been maintained by the farmer against any one who might have removed the engine, there could be no bailment. It was also contended that inasmuch as toll had been tendered and refused in respect of the van no liability attached, and that as the locomotive was drawing implements of primary importance in agriculture, toll was not payable on the locomotive drawing the van. Mr. Goodman quoted several Acts of Parliament, aud cited several cases, the most important of which was " Reg. against Matly." The magistrates retired to consider their decisioa, and on their return the Chairman stated the justices were of opinion that the exemption from toll attempted to be made out in respect of the van had not been proved, and also that the liability to toll of the locoTiotive drawing the same had not been established. Accordingly toll had to be paid for the van and not for the engine. A clergyman, the Rev. J . Gorring, was Chairman of the Bench. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 367 NORTH SHROPSHIRE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT NEWPORT. Of horses there was a large show, but as regards qual- ity not hardly equal to what had been seen on one or two previous occasions. Over 220 animals were shown, and they were divided into 17 classes. The Shorthorns formed a large class, but were a good deal mixed. The entries of Messrs. Sneyd, Bradburn, Horton, RadclifFe, Bennion, and Bickford were good specimens ; while the Duke of Suther- land's bull's pedigree was not given. Of Shropshire sheep there was really a great show ; the n umber of entrie? was 120, and the animals were divided into seven classes, namely — Aged rams 11 entries, shearlings 10, ram-lambs 22, seven pens of ewes of 20, five pens of five ewes each, nine pens of five each each, lambed in 1873 ; ten pens of five ewes each, lambed in 1874 ; or, in all, 303 Shropshire sheep. The names of the winners — Griffith, Mansell, Beech, Nock, Yates, Smith, and Wilkes, are guarantees of the character of the stock. The pigs made a poor show ; there were only eight entries, comprising twenty-four pigs, certainly a bad muster for a show which embraces so wide a district. Of cheese and butter there was also a rather limited show ; but ia wool some good competition. Of implements the show was the largest ever seen at an exhibition of the Society, and holding a conspicuous place in the showyard was a collection by Messrs. Corbett and Peele, of the Perseverance Iron Works, Shrewsbury. Lewis and Co., of Shrewsbury, also showed an assort- ment of implements, and Underbill, of Newport a very large stand ; while Corbett and Son, of Wellington, also had a large assortment. Gower and Son, Market Drayton, another varied collection. G. Aston, New- port, showed a number of Bradford's washing machines. E. Webb and Sons, of Ivy Mills, Wordsley, Stour- bridge, had a stand of seeds, manures, and agricul- tural produce ; and Proctor and Ryland a collection of bone manures for autumn use, and several fiue samples of roots. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES. — Agricultural Hunting and Hack Horses: Mr. J. Lea and JVIr. J. Belcher. Cattle : Mr. Jackson, Mr. J. Heatley, and Mr. Groves. Sheep: Mr. J. Evans, Uflingtou ; Mr. Keeling. PiGS : Mr. Burgess and Mr. Eiirdley. Implements : Mr. Stanley and Mr. Gouldbour«. Cheese and Butter : Mr. G. Lewis, Market Drayton ; Mr. Piatt, Mauchester. Wool : Mr. Thompson, Shrews- bury ; Mr. Smith, Shrewsbury. HORSES. Stallion for agricultural purposes. — First prize, £8, W. Williams, Dryton, Wroxeter. Highly commended : I. Lowe, Donington, Newport. Commended : W. Allen, Cherrington Manor, Newport. Mare with foal, for agricultural purposes. — First prize, £7, R. C. Pooler, Adney House, Newport ; second, £3, S. Lea Castle Hill, Spoonley, Market Drayton. Highly commended : T. Jackson,*jun., Sowdley, Market Drayton. Commended : S. Bourne, Goldsmith House, Burleydam, Whitchurch. Pair of horses for agricultural purposes. — First prize, £6, S. Bourne ; second, £3, W. Hunter, Oifoxey, Shitfnal. Highly cemmended : J. Heatley, Old Springs Farm, Market Drayton. Horse for Agricultural purposes. — First prize, £i, T. Booker, Sutton, Newport, Salop ; second, £3, J. Swift, Weston Jones, Newport, Salop. Highly commended : T. Ratclitfe, Cheswell Grange, Newport, Salop. Commended : G. McKuiglit, Mossey Green, Oakengates, Wellington. Colt tor agricultural purposes, (baled in 1871. — First prize, £!■, R. Heatley, Eaton Grange, Market Drayton ; second, £2, H. Pooler, Cheswell, Newport. Highly commended: J. Attwood, Weston Jones, Newport. Colt for agrieultQtal purposes, foaled in 1873. — First prize, £3, S. Lea; second, £3, J. Hammonds, Heath Hill, Newporr. Highly commended : W. D. Turner, Oulton House, Newport. Commended: Mrs. M. Davies, Harrington, Shifnal. Colt for agricultural purposes, foaled in 1873. — First prize, £3, J. Paddock; second, £2, B. Wainman, Whitley Manor, Newport. Highly commended : J. Lockley, Little Hales Manor, Newport. Stallion for hunting purposes.— Prize, £5, A. Bayley, New- castle-under-Lyme. additional frizes. Brood mare, with foal at foot.— First prize, a silver cup, 10 gs., C. R. Liddle, Highfield, Newport ; second, silver cup, T. Williams, Albrightlee, Battlefield, Shrewsbury. Highly com- mended, W. H. P. Nock, Burlington, Newport. Commended: A. H. Gordon, Brineton, Newport. Hunter, five years old and upwards, the hond fide property of a member of the Society smce March, IS?!*.— First prize, silver cup, 7 gs., and second, 3 gs., R. Ogle, Kinnersley Manor, Wellington. Highly commended: G. Waine, The Rowney Farm, Market Drayton, Hack or roadster, 15 hands or over.— First prize, £5, T. Radclitfe, and highly commended ; second, £2 10s. T. Powell, Cotton Farm, Hoduet. Cob, hack, or roadster, under 15 hands.— First prize, £5, R. M. Leeke, Longford Hall, Newport ; second, £2 10s., J. Deane, Betley, Crewe. Hi?hly commended : R. N. Heane, Newport., Commended : — Kemp, Market Drayton. Colt, foaled 1870, within the limits of the Society, likely to make a hunter.— First prize, £5, W. Bradburn, Wednesfield ; second, £3 10s., G. T. Phillips, Sheriffhales Manor. Colt, suitable for hack or roadster, foaled 1871— First pnze, £4, W. Davies, Hinstock, Market Drayton; second, £2, J. Bourne. Commended : G. Waiue. Colt, for the same purpose, foaled 1872— First prize, £3, and secoud, £2, W. H. P. Nock. Colt, for the same purpose, foaled 1873.— First prize, £3, H. Jones, Wrockwardine, Wellington ; second, £2, M. Lester, Petsy Farm, llodnet. Highly commended and commended : T Pciddoclc Pouv, under 13 hands.— First prize, £3, Mrs. A. Bird and Son; second, £1, J. Attwood. Commended: Mrs. A. Birdand Son. CATTLE. SHORTHORNS. Bull of any age, age to be taken into consideration. — First prize, £7, and silver cup, the Duke of Sutherland, Lilleshall Home Farm; second, £3 lOs. T. Williams, Albrightlee, Battlefield, Shrewsbury. Highly commended: F. S. Broade, Betley Hall, Crewe. "Commended: S. Dicken, Little Ness, Baschurch. Bull, calved 1872.— First prize, £7, B. Wainman, Whitley Manor, Newport ; second, £3 10s., S. L. Horton, Park House, Shilnal. Highly commended : T. Lester, Ollerton, Market Drayton. Commended: R. W. Ralph, Honington Grange, Newport. Bull, calved 1873.— First prize, £5, W. Bradburn, Wednes- field, Wolverhampton ; second, £2 10s., J. Morrey, Sutton, Market Drayton. Highly commended : H. Walker, Lilleshall Hill Farm, Newport. Commended: T. Radcliffe, Cheswell Grange, Newport. Bull, calved 187L— First prize, £3, T. Radcliffe ; second, £3, W. Bradburn. Highly commended : Rev. W. Sneyd, Keele Hall, Newcastle, Stafi'ordshire. Commended; T. Booker, Sutton, Newport. Cow, of any age, age to be taken into consideration, having produced a calf in 1874'.— First prize, £5, O. Bennion, Cress- v\ell, Stafford; second, £3, Rev. W. Sneyd. Highly com- mended and commended : W. Bradburn. Pair of heifers, calved 1873.— First prize, £4-, J. Bourne, Arbour Farm, Market Drayton ; second, £3, Rev. W. Sneyd. Highly commended : W. Yates, Griudle House, Shifnal. Heiter, calved 1873.— First prize, £3, S. L. Horton, Park House, Shifnal ; second, £2, J. Bickford, Moseley, Wolver- hampton. Highly commended : S. Wilkes, Brewer's Oak Farm, Shifnal. 368 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE.1 Pair of heifers, calved 1873.— First prize, £3, S. L. Horton ; second, £2, and highly commeaded, R. Dicken, Aston, Wel- linffton. Pair of heifers, calved 1874.— First prize, £3, W. Brad- burn. Bull, calved 1872.— First prize £7, W. U. Corser, Moor- house, Much Wenlock. Cow, of any age, age to be considered, having produced a calf in 1874.— Prize, £5, M. Williams, Dryton, Wroxeter. Highly commended : E. II. Uavies, Patton, Much Wenlock. Commended : K. C. Pooler, Adney House, Newport. Heifer, calved 1872.— Prize, £4, E. H. Davies. Highly commended : W. E,. Corser. Pair of heifers, calved 1873.— Prize, £3, M. Williams. ADDITIONAL FRIZES. Alderney or other Channel Island cow, in milk, having pro- duced a calf in 1874. — First prize, silver cup, value £5, Rev. J. Hill, The Citadel, Hawkestone: second, £2, Mrs. D. Hudson, Cheswardine Hall, Market Drayton. Highly com- mended: Rev. J. Hill. Commended: Mrs. D. Hudson. Cow of any breed for dairy purposes, having produced a calf in 1874. — First prize, £5, J. Bickford ; second, £3, J. Booker, Wilbrighton, Newport. Highly commended : J. Booker. Commended : W. Bradburn. Fat ox, cow, steer, or heifer. — First prize, £4, Rev. W. Sneyd ; second, £2, E. H. Davies. SHEEP. Ram of any age (age to be considered). — First prize, £7, and econd, £3 10s., H. Griffin, Pell Wall, Market Drayton. HigWy commended : T. Mansell, Ercall-park, Wellington. Com- mended : E. H. Davies, Patton, Much Wenlock. Ram, lambed 1873.— First prize, £7, Mrs. S. Beach, The Hattous, Brewood, Staffordshire ; second, £3 10s. ,W. H. P. Nock, Burlington, Newport. Highly commended : H. Griffin. Com- mendded : T. Nock, Sutton-house, Snifual. Ram lamb, lambed 1874.— First prize, £4, Mrs. S. Beach ; second, £2, T. Nock. Highly commended : W. Yates, Grindle- house, Suifal. Commended : S. Wilkes, Brewer's Oak Farm, Snifnal. Twenty ewes, of any age, each having produced a lamb in 1874.— First prize, £10, T. Mansell, Ercall-park, Wellington ; second, £5, Mrs. H. Smith, New-house, Sutton Maddock, Snifnal. Highly commenaed : M. Williams, Dryton, Wroxeter. Com- mended : W. Yates, Grindle-house, Snifnal. Five ewes of any age, each having produced a lamb in 1874. — First prize, £6, Mrs. S. Beach ; second, £3, Mrs. H. Smith. Highly commended : M. Williams, Dryton, Wroxeter. Com- mended : J. C. Burton Borough, Chetwynd Park, Newport. Five ewes, lambed in 1873. — First prize, £5, S. Wilkes ; second, £2 10s., W. Yates. Highly commended : T. Mansel : Commended : W. H. P. Nock, Burlington, Newport. Five ewe-lambs, lambed in 1874. — First prize, £4, Mrs. S. Beach ; second, £2, W. Yates. Highly commended : M. Williams. Commended : W. H. P. Nock, Burlington, New- port ; W. Nevett, Yorton-villa, Shrewsbury. Long- wool ram of any age (age to be considered). — First prize, £4, and highly commended, J. Wheeler, Long Compton, Shipston-on-Stour, Warwick. Commended : T. Radcliffe, Cheswell Grange, Newport. Ram lambed in 1873.— Prize, £2, J. Wheeler. Five ewes of any age, each having produced a lamb in 1874. —First prize, £3, T. Furber, High Offley, Newport. PIGS. Boar, large breed, of any age. — First prize £3, J. Wheeler, Long Comptou, Shipston-on-Stour ; second, £2, B. Waiaham, Whitley Manor, Newport. Breeding sow, in pig, or with farrow of sucking pigs not exceeding ten weeks old. — First prize, £3, T. Radcliffe, Ches- well Grange, Newport ; second, £2, W. Earp, Lower Bar, New- port. Commended : S. Wilkes, Brewers' Oak Farm, Snifnal. Boar, small breed of any ag;e. — Prize, £3, J. Wheeler. Breeding sow, in pig, or with farrow of sucking pigs, not exceeding ten weeks old. — First prize, £3, J.Wheeler; second, £2, and commended, C D. Hudson, Cheswardine Hall, Market Drayton. Highly commended : R. Cooke, Chipual, Market Drayton. Three sows, of any breed, of the same farrow, about four and under eight months old. — First prize, £3, J. Wheeler ; second, £2, T. Radcliffe. Fat pig. — First prize, £2, J. Wheeler ; second £1, J . Bray, Weston, Snifnal. EXTRA STOCK PRIZES. Horses. G. H. Haslam, Market Drayton. Cattle. J. Bickford, Moseley, Wolverhampton — wliite calf (A.my). G. T. Phillips, Sheriff hales Manor, Newport — red-and- white Shorthorn heifer. CHEESE. Thick cheese. — First prize, £5, J. Heatley, Old Springs, Market Drayton ; second, J. Bourne, The Arbour, Market Drayton. Highly commended : E. Massey, The Pool Farm, Adderley, Market Drayton. Thin cheese. — First prize, £5,G. Pierce, Guild Farm, New- port; second, Mrs. A. Podmore, Chetwynd Grange Farm, Newport. Highly commended: J. Paddock, Chetwynd Aston, Newport. Commeaded : Mrs. Busby, Haugliton Cottage Stafford. The cheese was the manufacture of the exhibitor in the year 1874, was not expressly to show, but a fair sample of the dairy, and not less than 1 cwt. BUTTER. First prize, £1, G. Pierce ; second, W. W. Derington, Chet- wynd Villa, Newport. Highly commended : Rev- C. F. C. Pigott, Edgmond Reotory, Newport. Commended : C. D, Hudson, Cheswardine Hall, Market Drayton. WOOL. Five fleeces of Sliropshire wool. — First prize, £5, W. Fowler, Acton Reynold, Shrewsbury ; second, J. Broughall, Sutton Maddock, Shiffnal ; third, T. Rider, Edgebculton, Shawbury. Highly commended : W. H. P. Nock, Burlington, Newport. Commended : J. C. Burton, Borougli, Chetwynd Park, New- port. IMPLEMENTS. 1st Class Medals. — W. S. Underbill, Newport, for general assortment; Corbett and Son, Wellington, fur an improved two-horse gear ; Lewis and Co., Shrewsbury, for Emperor combined mower and reaper. 2ud Class Medals. — W. S. Underbill, for six-horse steam eneine; ditto, for six-horse thrashing machine ; Corbett and Son, Wellington, for a R.A.S. grinding mill ; Corbett and Peele, Shrewsbury, for Eclipse combined blowing and winnow- ing machine; also for combined corn barrow drill; A. W. Gower and Son, Market Drayton, for mne-coulter corn drill. At the dinner, the President, Mr. C. C. Coates, M.P., said, there had been proposals made in certain quarters that societies like that should be merged in a large society which should in- clude in its area the whole of this and possibly one of the adjoining counties. That, however, was not the place for the discussion of that question, but he hoped after the success of the show that day, both as regards the number of people who were present, and the quantity and quality of the stock that was exhibited, that the claims of Newport as a place suitable for holding the show, whether of the Kortii Shropshire or any other agricultural society, would always be fairly and favour- ably considered. With regard to the present show, he believed that they had good reason to congratulate themselves on the fact that, not only had tiie North Shropshire Agricultural Society this year held its own, but that it had made a great stride of progress. He had, himself, only seen three shows of the Society ; the first, two years ago, at Wellington, the second, last year, at Market Drayton, and the present show ; and he must say that, whether they regarded the number or the qualiiy of the entries, this show was far superior to any of the Society he had witnessed. The horses and cattle were good, and the sheep classes presented such an appearance as was seldom to be witnessed at a local show. There was one question to which he wished to allude before he sat down, and which had been touclied upon earlier in the evening by a gentleman who was well qualified to do so, and whom they always listened to with pleasure, either in public or from the pulpit — the rector of Edgmond. It was a question of the very highest impor- tance to the agricultural community, and was occupying a considerable amount of attention at the present time. Hap- pily, so far as he knew, in that district there had been none of those unfortunate disputes which had for some months convulsed almost the wliole of the Eastern Counties. He earnestly trusted that no cause for dispute would hereafter arise, but that those amicable relations which had so far existed between employer and employed, those social ties which had liitherto bound them together (more valuable in his opinion than any mere commercial agreement), would be long THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 369 maintained, as he considered that if they were carried out in a spirit of equity and fairness both sides would reap the benefit, lie did not like to look forward to the prospect of any such dilTerences arising, and he lioped that th.it day miglit be far distant. But sliould tliey unfortunately arise, and dis- putes should take place between employer and employed, he earnestly hoped that both sides would be wise enough to be guided by their own counsels without having recourse to those who came from a distance, and who were, to say the least of it, imperfectly acquainted with the facts of the case. He had been very much struck by the fact that in the recent dispute iu the Eastern Counties, gentlemen, eminent in the mercantile world, had come forward to speak authoritatively on the agri- cultural labourers' question, with which they could have no practical acquaintance. He thought that were the cases re- versed and were he and his friends to take part in matters which affected the mercantile interest they would at once be told that they knew nothing of the matter with which' they were attempting to deal. Now tiiat the struggle was over he hoped that the conquerors would use their victory with mode- ration, and that, as lar as possible, the kindly feeling which had previously existed would return, and that no business or spirit of retaliation jFould be shown by eitiier side in the future. J\Jr. Ormsby Gore, M.P., had never seen a better show of _ — the rams were fine, and so were the ewes, while the lambs were more than fine. He was glad to see the crops were so good in this neiglibourhood, and in Wales he had never seen finer crops than tliey had had this year. With reference to the malt, he might say lie had had a conversation with Mr. Bass, M.f ., and that gentleman assured him that there would be good returns of bnrley this year. With reference to the proposed araalgation of this Society with others, or with the merging of it into a general society for the county, he did not agree. If it was desirable there should be a society of the latter description, well and good ; but wiiy should the existence of such a society interfere with the existence of the North Shropshire as a district Society ? Seeing the district Society had done so much good, let them continue, rather than give it up. Lord Newport, M.P., said there was one thing the Chan- cellor of the Exchequer had refused to deal with, and which he himself would like to have seen repealed — tlie Malt-lax. [Mr. Mansell : " We want it off."] He was pleased with the abolition of the horse-duty, for that would be a great boon to agriculturists. The recent legislation with regard to local taxation would also be welcomed by the agricultural commu- nity, and he might say that her Majesty's minister's had been advised, in another session, to deal with the question in geueral. NORTHALLERTON AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. Horses and cattle were not as largely represented as usual. The roots were quite a feature of the exhibition, forming the best show of the kind come across this sea- son. Horses included a representation of the best animals in the North Riding, and for the cup given by the member for the borough there was a keen competi- tion, the class including some well-known prize-winners. PRIZE LIST. HORSES. HUNTERS. Colt foal for the field. — First prize, T. Hengh, Romauby Parm, Northallerton ; second, W. Clarke, Asenby, Thirsk. Pilly foal ior the field.— Pirst prize, R. Mothersill, Brock- holme, Northallerton ; second, J. and H. Ward, Pairholm, Nothallerton. Yearhng gelding for the field. — First prize, G. Lancaster, Morton Grange, Northallerton ; second, T. and G. Knowles, Windy Hill, Hutton, Rudby, Yarm. Yearling filly for the field. — First prize, J. Weighell, Whitby ; secondj G. Potts, Greenhow Hill, Great Ayton, Northallerton. Two years old gelding for the field. — First prize, J. Sed- man, Wilton, Pickering ; second, T. H. Hutchinson, Manor House, Catterick. Two years old filly for the field. — First prize, T. H. Hutchin- son ; second, T. and G. Knowles. Three years old geldings for the field. — First and second prizes, G. Lancaster. Three years old for the field. — First prize, A. Brigham, Settrington, York ; second, M. Raw, Piercebridge Grange, Darlington. COACHING. Colt foal. — First prize, W. Sidgwick, Knowles Farm, Kirk- leavington ; second, J. Wood, Park House, Gilling, York. Filly foal. — First prize, J. Pattison, Brompton ; second, J. Reader, Beacon Farm, Holme, York. Yearling gelding. — First prize, W. Watson, Cockerton, Darlington ; second, G. Lancaster. Yearling filly. — First prize, J. Campion, Overdale Farm, Lythe; second, J. Patiison. Two years old gelding. — First prize, J. Smith, Gyll Hall, Catterick ; second, G. Meynell, Wardle liouse, Patrick Bromp- ton, Bedule. Two years old filly. — First prize, C. and J. Smith, Broad- gate, Westerdale, Yarm ; second, J. and J. Welford, Newton Mulgrave, Hinderwell, Saltburn. Three years old gelding.— First prize, T. Phimmer, Bird- forth, Easingwoldj second, I, Scartli, Mouut Pleasant, West ^ounton. Three years old filly. — First prize, J. and F. Hill, Nether Silton, Northallertou ; second, T. Dobson, Easington, Salt- biira. ROADSTERS. Colt or filly. — First prize, E. Shepherd, Aiskew, Bedale ; second, A. Kirby, High Grange, Market Weigliton. Yearling gelding or filly. — First prize, Kirby, R. Kirby Sigston, Northallerton ; second, W. Dixon, Sharow, Ripon. Two years old gelding or filly. — First prize, M. Harrison, Water, Pocklington ; second, M. Morton, Leak Hall, Tliirsk. Three years old gelding or filly. — First prize, T. Foster, Allen's Grange, Piercebridge, Darlington ; second, R. Kirby, Kirby Sigston. AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES. Colt or filly foal. — First prize, T. Pick, Street House, New- sham, Thirsk ; second, Mrs. Kitchen and Sons, Whorlton, Swainby Stokesley. Yearling gelding or filly. — First prize, Mrs. Kitching and Sons; second, T. Potts, Swainby Mill, Northallerton. Two years old gelding. — First prize, W. Kitching, Summer- field ; second, D. Sanderson, Richmond. Two years old filly. — First prize, W. Appleton, Balk ; second, W". Wilkinson, South Kilviiigton. Three years old gelding. — First prize, R. Lee, Ferryhill ; second, R. Tweedie, Catterick. Three J ears old filly. — First and second prizes, Mrs. Hed- don, Baldersby. Pair of horses of either sex. — First prize, T. H. Hutchin- son; second, Mrs. Heddou. BROOD MARES. Mares fur breeding hunters, with a foal or stinted. — First prize, W. Johnson, Bagby ; second, Vv'^. Clarke, Asenby. Mare for breeding coach-horses, with a foal or stinted. — First prize, M. Robinson, Hauswell ; second, J. Reader, Holme. Mare for breeding roadsters, with a foal or stinted. — First prize, A. Kirby, Market Weighton ; second, H. R. W. Hart, York. Mare for breedina; agricultural horses, with a foal or stinted. — First prize, R. Watson, Stockton-on-Tees ; second, T. H. Hutcliinsun. SPECIAL DISTRICT PRIZE. Mare for breeding agricultural horses, with a foal or stinted. — Prize, J. Smith, Northallertou. Horses to be Ridden in the Ring. HUNTERS. Four years old gelding or mare. — First prize, D. and R Batty, Helperby ; second, T. Darrell, West Ayton ; third, T H. Hutciunson. 370 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. SPECIAL PKIZE. Hunter, gelding, or mare, not exceeding eight years old, by a thorougli-bred horse, capable of carrying 1-i stones with iiouuds, and that has been regularly hunted with an estab- lished pack of foxhounds in the counties of Yorkshire or Durham. — First prize, Cup, T. 11. Hutchinson ; second, D. aud il. Batty ; third, T. Danell. HACKNEYS. Hackney mare or gelding, under eight years old. — First prize, W. H. Blackman, Wressle ; second, W. Stephenso3, Cottingham. PONIES. Pony not exceeding 14- hands. — First prize, W. H. Black- man; second, Viscount Castlereagh, Stockton-on-Tees; third, Mrs. Barnes, Warlaby Lodge. CATTLE. SHORTHORNS. Bull, above two years old. — First prize, G. Yeates, Studley, llipou ; second, L Garbutt, Farndale. Bull, above one and under two years old. — First prize, C. aud J. Smith, Broadgate, Yarm ; second, N. Russell, Northal- lerton. Bull-calf, under twelve months old. — First prize. — H. Clay, Northallerton ; second, E. and VV. Dovener, 13edale. Cow, in calf or milk, having had a calf within twelve months. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson, Catterick ; second, T. H. Hutchinson. Heifer, under three years old, in calf or milk. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson ; second, H. Clay. Heifer, under two years old. — First prize, T. H. Hutchin- son ; second, T. Strickland, Thirsk Junction. Heifer, under twelve months old. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson ; second, W. White, Bedale. DISTRICT PRIZES. Cow, in calf or milk, having liad a calf within twelve months. — First prize, G. K. Harlan d, Northallerton ; second, N. Russell. Heifer, under three yeirs old, in calf or milk. — First prize, T. Strickland ; second, VV. White. Heifer, uuder two years old. — First prize, T. Strickland , second, H. Clay. Heifer, under twelve months old. — First prize, W. Bear- park, Ainderby Steeple ; second, C. Wailes, Northallerton. A cup, given by Mrs. Elliot, for the best heifer exhibited and bred in the district. — Prize, H. Clay. DAIRY COWS. Cow for dairy purposes, in calf or milk. — First prize, G. K. Harland, Northallerton ; second, R. Kirby aud Son, Northal- lerton ; third, J. B. Braithwaite, Northallerton. Cow for dairy purposes, the property of a cottager. — First prize, J. Wilson, Thirsk ; second, T. Gill, Thirsk. EAT BEASTS. Fat beast. — First prize, M. and W. Boville, Orraotherley ; second, M. and VV. Boville. SHEEP. LF.ICESTERS. Ram, one shear. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson ; second, T. H. Hutchinson. Ram, aged. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson ; second, R. Tarbotton, York. Tup lamb. — First prize, R. Harrison, Richmond ; second, R. Harrison. Pen of five ewes, having suckled lambs in 1874. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson ; second, E. and W. Dovener. Pen of five gimmer shearlings. — First prize, T. H. Hutch- j iuson ; second, R. Tarbotton. Pen of five gimmer lambs. — First prize, T. H. Hutchinson ; second, R. Tarbotton, Corton. OTHER LONGWOOLS. Ram, one shear. — First prize, R. Harrison ; second, F. Heugh, Nortiiallerton. Ram, aged. — First prize, F. Heugh ; second, G. Lancaster, Northallerton. LEICESTERS OF LONGWOOLS. District Prizes. Ram, aged. — First prize, F. Heugh ; second, E. and W. Dovener. Ram, one shear. — First prize, E. and W. Dovener ; second, F. Heugh. Tup lamb. — First prize, W. Clapham, W^est Harsley, North- allerton ; second, W. Clapham. Pen of five ewes, having suckled lambs in 1874. — First prize, W. Hall, Thirsk ; second, E. and W. Dovener. Pen of five gimmer shearlings. — First prize, E. and W. Dovener ; second, Thomas Carter, Thirsk. Pen of five gimmer lambs. — First prize, T. Kirby, Northal- lerton ; second, Thomas Carter. b'en of five fat sheep. — First prize, W. Robinson, Morton- on-Swale ; second, W. Robinson. PIGS. Boar, large breed. — First prize, J. Wilson, Rainton, Thirsk; second, D. Sanderson, Richmond. Boar, small breed. — First prize, T. Strickland ; second, D. Sanderson. Sow, large breed, in jig or milk. — First prize, J. Tutin, Brompton Moor, Northallerton ; second, J. B. Braithwaite, North Otterington, Northallerton. Sow, small breed, m pig or milk. — First prize, D. Sander- son ; second, George Hamilton, Northallerton. Fat pig. — First prize, D. Sandersou ; second, T. Strick- land. Pig, the property of a cottager, being a householder, whose total rental does not exceed £8 per annum. — First prize, Thomas Dickens, Roraanby ; second, James Eden, Thirsk; third, John Thackeray, Yafforth. SPECIAL PRIZE. Black pig, the produce of his breed. — Prize, Thomas Dickens. ROOTS. Six swede turnips grown by exhibitor. — First prize, G. Oliver, Northallerton ; second, T. C. Booth, Warlaby. Six turnips, any other variety, grown by exhibitor. — T. C. Booth ; second, R. Leak, Bedale. Six mangolds grown by exhibitor. — First prize, T. Pick, Tliirsk ; second, Hon. G. E. Lascelles, Thirsk. Twelve kidney potatoes grown by exhibitor. — First prize, W. Harker, Northallerton ; second, G. J. Hinchcliffe, Northal- lerton. Twelve round potatoes grown by exhibitor. — Firtt prize, 11. Leak ; second, W. Bell, Thornton-le-Moor. Collection of roots grown by exhibitor. — First prize, W. Shipley, Thornton-le-Moor; second, G. J. Robinson, Thirsk. Special Prizes: Twelve swede turnips. — Prize, J, and H. Ward, Northallerton. Collection of roots. — Prize, G. Lancaster, Northallerton. Collection of roots.— Krst prize, J. S. Atkinson, Northal- lerton ; second, G, Lancaster; third, W. Shipley. LONG SUTTON AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES.— Horses : W. Barber, Routh, Beverley; L. Nicholson. Gosberton, Spalding ; C. Banks, Holbeach Marsh. Beasts, Sheep, and Pius : J. Parish, Toynton, Spilsby ; C. Mason, Beeclmmwell, Swatfliam, Norlolk, Implements and Roots : S. W. Campaign, Deeping St. Nicholas; J. A. Clarke, Long Sutton Marsh. HORSES. Cart stallion. — First prize, J. Tomlinson, Lutton Marsh, Long Sutton ; second, R. Kiiham, Folley, Long Sutton. Cart mare, with foal. — First and second prize, J. Tomlinson. Pair of draught geldings or mares. — First prize, J. Tom- linson ; second, VV. and G. Horn. Two-year-old cart gelding. — First prize, F. Howard, the Crosses, Long Sutton ; second, L. Egar, Wryde, Thorney. Two-year-old cart filly. — Fir'st and second prize, VV. and G. Horn. Cart foal. — First prize, J. Cropper, Long Sutton ; second, J. Tomlinson. Hackney stallion. — First prize, W. Giddens, Hill House, W^alpole, VVisbech ; second, T. Uptou, Gosberton. Hackney horse or mare, not under 14 hands 2 inches. — THE FARMEE'S MAGAZINE. 871 First prize, W. Giddens ; second, E. B. Bcttinson, Manor House, Gedney. Harness horse or mare, not under li hands 3 inches. — First prize, J. Baker, Wisbech ; second, S. Campaign, jun., Deeping St. Micholas, Spalding. Gelding or mare, over 13 hands and under li hands 2 inches. — Prize, VV. Johnson, Walpole, Wisbech. Pony, not exceeding 13 hands. — Prize, G. Snarey, jun.. Old Mark"!, Wisbech. Hunter, not under four years old. — First prize, J. G. Hobson, Long Sutton ; second, S. S. Mossop, Long Sutton. CATTLE. Bull, any age. — First prize, C. Beart, Stow Bardolph, Downliam Market ; second, T. Y. Siudall, Fulney Hall, Spalding. Cow in-calf, orin-milk. — First prize, W. Johnson ; second, J. H. Barker, Holbeach. Heifer in-calf or milk, not exceeding three years old. — First and second prize, W. Johnson. Pair of steers, not exceeding two years old. — First prize, W. Wright, Button ; second, W. Naylor, Long Sutton. Pair of fat oxen, cuws, or heifers. — Prize, J. Bett, Holbeach. Heifer, not exceediutj two years old. — First prize, R. Parker, North Creake, Fakenhara ; second, W. Wright. Heifer calf, under twelve mouths. — Prize, W. Wright. SHEEP. Five longwooUed '.reeding ewes, any age. — First and second prize, W. Wright. Five longwooUed sliearling ewes. — First and second prize, W. Wright. Five shearling wethers. — First prize, J. Cooke, Pode Hole, Spalding; second, G. Bettiuson, Button. Five heder lambs. — First prize, Mrs. Portugal, Tydd, St. Giles, Wisbeach ; second, W. Webster, Gedney Marsh. Five ewe lambs.— First prize, Mrs. Portugal; second, G. Fletcher, Holbeach Hurn. Extra class.— First prize, J. Cooke; second, H.R.U. the Prince of Wales, K.G., Sandringhani. PIGS. Boar, small breed. — First prize, T. Y. Sindall ; second, H. A. Kiliiam, Tydd St. Mary. Sow in-pig or suckling, large breed. — Prize, H. A. Kilhatn. Sow in-pig or suckling, sm:dl breed.— Prize, H. A.Kilham. Three pigs, under six months old. — Prize, W. J. Wright, Button. E.xtra class. — Prize, G. and R. W.Oldershaw, Gedney Marsh. ROOTS. Ten swede turnips. — Prize, W. Wright. Ten long mangolds. — Prize, J. G. Hobson, Curlew Lodge, Long Sutton. Ten globe mangolds. — Priz», J. T. Bettiuson, Gadney, Lons Sutton.^ Ten kohl rabi. — Prize, J. Snushall, Fleet. Ten drumhead cabbnges. — Prize, J. C. Anderson, Long Sutton, Marsh. Peck of potatoes, any kind. — Prize, G. Clarke, Lutton Marsh. IMPLEMENTS. Stand of implements. — Prize, Barford and Perkins, Peter- borough. General purpose drill. — Prize, Barford and Perkins. Set of harrows. — Prize, C. Hardy, Button. THE ROYAL AND CENTRAL BUCKS AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATION. MEETING AT AYLESBURY. Amongst the Shorthorns Mr. J. A. Muniford was first in the bull class with his Notley, which last year was second ; ia the class of bulls under two years the first prize went to a bull belong to Mr. Sharp, of Kettering ; ia the class of single cows in milk or in calf, Mr. T. L. Senior's Devon Moss Rose was first in a good entry of eight. For the three cow prizes, Mr. J. A. Mumford and Mr. T. Kingsley took first and second, while for in-calf heifers Mr. T. Hewer's Shorthorn Huntress and Mr. Senior's Moss Rose were the best, the Shorthorn standing first. In the class of heifers, in pairs, under two years, jMr. Muinford's pair obtained first prize and Mr. J. Sharpe the second, with a third pair shown by Mr. J. Denchfield highly commended. In the two fat cattle classes the eotrits were not numerous, and Mr. Senior carried off the first prize for fat cows and both for oxen ; the two steers were one Devon and the other half-bred. The competition in the sheep classes was not so large. In the ram class there were six entries, and Mr. John Treadwell took the first prize, his most formid- able competitor being Mr. George Street, of Maulden, who came second ; and was first in store ewe lambs for breeding purposes, as also in those for fat shear- lings and breeding theaves. The cup for the best pen of breeding ewes or theaves, and likewise the cup for the best pen of sheep in the yard, were also both awarded to Mr. Street, who has this year competed at these shows for the first time. The pig classes also were not very largely filled. Mr. J. Wheeler won the first prize for boars, while thesecond was taken by Mr. Buli'ord, of V/inchendon. In the two sow classes, Mr. R. Fowler carried ott" both prizes for Berkshires, and Mr. J. Wheeler for any other breed, while the fat pig prizes were awarded, the first prize to I\lr. Biggs, of Cublington, and the second to Mr. Elliott, of Hulcott. For cart stallions two valuable cups, pre- sented by Sir A. de Rothschild, attracted a total of fifteen eatrics ; and the judges avt'arded the first prize to Nonpareil, a five-year-old chestnut, shown by Mr. John Manning, of Orlingbury ; with the second prize to Mr. W. Coles's King Lincoln. Mr. E. Denchfield won for working horses, as he did also for mares and foals ; and there was a good entry of cart yearlings, the first prize falling to Messrs. Richman, of St. Ives. In the hunter class there were nine entries, Mr. C. Elliott, of Hulcott, stand- ing first, and Mrs. White, of Pollicott, second. Of the remaining horse classes, the nags had an entry of fourteen, and Mr. J. Tompkins, of Ivinghoe, stood first ; while Mr. Leppcr was the winner of Baroness M. A de Rothschild's cup for the best yearling nag colt, with a son of Rapid Roan. Despite the exceedingly unfavourable season for root cultivation, Thursday's show produced a very creditable entry. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES.— Ploughing and Pigs: W. Hawkes, Thenford, Banbury ; W. Denchfield, Banbury. Hokses : J. K.' Elhott, Heathencote, Towcester ; T. Berridge, Ratley Kineton, Warwick ; —Plowright, jun., The Hall, Pinchbeck^ Lincoln. Cattle: M. Savidge, Sarsden Lodge Farm, Chipping Norton ; C. Hobbs, Maisy Hampton, Cricklade'. Sheep : A.F.Milton Druce, Twelve Acres, Eynsham ; G. Bagnall, Westwell, Burford. Butter: H. Pybus, jun., 1(), Charterhouse-lane, London. Root Crops: J. Crouch', Court Farm, Aylesbury : R. Fowler, Broughton. Roots : J. Crouch ; C. Elliott^, Hulcott. HORSES FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES. Cart stallions, 3 years old and upwards ; the winners of the first and second prizes to remain at Aylesbury at least three nights in each week during the ensuiag season. Members of the Association to have the pritilege ot sending mares to be served at the rate ot£l lis. 6d. each, including groom's fee. — First prize, £60, J. Manning, OrUugbnry, Wellingborough ; second, £25, W. Coles, Long Crendon. Commended : s'. Davies, Wooiashill. 372 THE FABMER'S MAGAZINE. Geldings, three years old and upwards. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., J. P. Terry, Pultowes ; second, £2. Commended : J. P. Terry. Geldings, under three years. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 Ss., W. B. Clark, Uppings, Weedon ; second, £:2,E. J. Clift, Weedon. Commended : J. Hughes, Stone. Mares, over three years. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., E. Denchfield, Burston; second, £2, E.'l'erry, Buckingham-road, Aylesbury. Commended: E.Terry. Mare and foal. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., E. Denchfield ; second, £2, W. R. Rowland, Creslow. Commended: T. Birdsey, Leighton Buzzard. Mares, under three years. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value, £5 5s., W.and J. Rose, Eythrope ; second, £2, J. Hughes, .Stone. Commended : Harris and Biggs, Cub- lington. Yearling cart colt or filly. — First prize, a silver cup, value £10 10s., H. Reynolds, The Idover, Dauntsey, Chippenham; second, £2, J. R. Simons, Berryfield. Commended : W. R. Rowland. Horses or mares, for hunting purposes. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £7 7s., C. Elliott, Hulcott ; second, £3 3s., Mrs. M. White, Pollicott. Commended : W. Hawkins, Edlesborough. Nag geldings and mares, for riding and general purposes. — First prize, £5, J. Tomkins, Ivinghoe ; second, £2, J. P. Terry, Putlowes. Commended : Mrs M. White. Hunters. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £21, J.Pettit, Leightou 13uzzard ; second, £5 5s., W. Hawkins. Commended : T. Pain, Lower Pertwood, Hindon, Wilts. Sucking colt or filly. — For the best sucking colt or filly, by either of the Vale of Aylesbury Horse Company's horses — Prize, a silver cup, value £10 10s., E. J. Clii't, Weedon. A silver cup, value £10 10s., for the best cart-horse or mare in the show yard, was awarded to W. B. Clark, Uppings. A silver cup, for the best yearling nag colt, G. A. Lepper, Aylesbury. Commended, J. Denchfield. CATTLE. Bulls, any breed, two years old and upwards. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 6s., J. A. Mumford, Chilton ; second, £2, T. Kingsley, Boarscraft. Commended : G. Underwood, Little Gaddesden. Bulls, under two yrars. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., J. J. Sharp, Broughton, Kettering; second, £2, T. Hewer, Hylesham, Lechdale. Highly com- mended; J. Denchfield, Burston. Commended: J. A. Mum- ford, Brill. Cows, in milk or in calf. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., T. L. Senior, Broughton House, Ayles- bury ; second, £2, J. J. Sharp. Highly commended : J, Denchfield ; T. Kingsley, Boarscraft. Three cows, in milk or in calf. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £10 10s., J. A. Mumford, Chilton; second, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., T. Kings- ley. Highly commended : J. Denchfield. Heifers, in milk or in calf, under three and over two years. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., T. Hewer ; second, i'2, T. L. Senior. Highly commended : F. R. Denchfisld, Aston Abbotts. Commended: F. R. Dench- field. Heifers, in pairs, under two years. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., J. A. Mumford ; second, £2, J. J. Sharp. Highly commended : J. Denchfield. Fat heifers or cows. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., T. L. Senior ; second, £2, R. Fowler, Broughton. Oien (any breed). — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., T. L. Senior ; second, £2, T. L. Senior. Commended : T. Taylor, Aston Rowant. Extra Stock. — Commended : T. L. Senior (Devon ox) , H. Wyatt, Walton, Aylesbury (heifer). A silver cup, value £5 5s., for the best animal, bred by the exhibitor, exhibited in the classes of horned 8tock,_was awarded to T. L. Senior. A silver cup or piece of plate, value £10 10s., to the best horned animal in the yard, being the property of a tenant- farmer within twelve raiies of Aylesbury, was taken by J. A. Mumford, Chilton. SHEEP. Rams, any breed. — First prize, a silver cup oi piece of plate, value £6 5s., J. Treadwell, Upper Winchendon ; second, £2 2s., F. Street, Harrowden House, Bedford. Five store ewe lambs, for breeding purposes. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., G. Street, Maulden, Ampthill ; second, £2, G. Street. Highly commended : F. Street. Five fat ewes, any breed or age. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., J. Treadwell ; second, £2, R. Fowler, Broughton. Five fat shearlings. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., G. Street; second, £2, Z. W. Stilgoe, Adderbury Grounds, Banbury. Five ewes, of any breed, intended for breeding purposes.— First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., N. Stilgoe ; second, £2, R. Fowler. Commended : E. Dench- field, Burston. Five theaves, any breed, intended for breeding purposes. — • First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., G. Street; second, £2, G. Street. Highly commended; F» Street. Ten ewes, for breeding purposes, any breed. — Prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 Ss., J. P. Terry, Putlowes. Highly commended : E. Terry, Buckingham-road, Aylesbury. Ten ewe lambs, any breed. — Prize, a silver cup, value £5 5s., J. F. Perkins, Chilton. A silver cup, value £5 5s., to the owner of the best pen of breeding ewes or theaves in the yard, was awarded to G. Street. A gold pencil-case, value £3, to the owner of the best pen of fat sheep, was taken by G. Street. Best pen of sheep in tiie yard. — Prize, silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., G. Street. PIGS. Boars of any breed. — First prize, £o 3s. J. Wheeler, Long Compton, Shipton-on-Stour ; second, £2, Pv. Fowler, Brough- ton. Highly commended : J. Bulford, Upper Winchendon. Sows, Berkshire, either in pig or with litter, of which the young pigs shall not be over eight weeks old. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., and second, £2, R. Fowler. Commended : E. D. Lee, Hartwell House. Sows of any breed. — First prize £3 Ss., and second, £2, J. Wheeler. Commended : P. Payne, jun., Walton, Aylesbury. Three fat pigs. — First prize, £3 3s., J. Biggs, Cublington; second, £2, C. Elliott, Hulcott. BUTTER. Twelve pounds of butter, in 21b. lumps. — First prize £3 3s., A. Roads, Rowsham, dairymaid £1; second, £2 2s., R. Fowler, dairymaid 10s. Highly commended; T.Matthews, Waddesdon. Commended: J- R. Simonds, Berryfield. ROOTS. For the best crop of mangold wurtzel, of not less than three acre (the whole of the mangolds on the farm to be taken into consideration). — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £7 7s., E. Denchfield, Burston ; second, £3 3s., T. Birdsey, Leighton Buzzard. To the member who shall grow the best crop of mangold wurtzel of not less than three acres, within 12 miles of Ayles- bury.— Prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £5 5s., E. Denchfield, Burston. To the member who shall grow the best crop of Swedish turnips, of not less than five acres, within 12 miles of Ayles- bury.— Prize, a silver cup or plate, value £5 5s., E. Freeman, Chilton. For the best crop of swedes, of not less than six acres (the whole of the swedes on the farm to be taken into considera- tion), for tenant-farmers only, within 12 raiies of Aylesbury. — First prize, a silver cup or piece of plate, value £7 Vs., J. P. Parrott ; .second, £3 3s., J. Bulford, Upper Winchendon. Collection of not less tiian four varieties, to include Sutton's new Golden Tankard Yellow Fleshed Mangolds. — Prize, a, silver cup, value £5 5s., J. Bates, Aylesbary. Highly com- mended : T. Birdsey, Leighton Buzzard. Twenty-five mangolds, taken from a piece of not less than two acres. — First prize, £2, E. Denchfieled ; second, £1, O. Hatton, Chinnor. Reserved: J. Bates, Alesbury. Com- mended : J. H. Guy, Whitchurch. Twenty-five swedes, taken from a piece of not less than two acres.— First prize, £2, J.H.Guy; second, £1, J. H. Guy. THE FABMER'S MAGAZINE* 373 At the diauer, Mr. J. K. Fowler said : The House of Commons had a great deal to do, notwithstaading that the past one had been called a barren session, and perhaps before the next one there would be no harm in their learning the opinions of their constituents upoa some of the legisktion which might have to be dealt with by them. It was not for him to introduce general politics at the meetings of that association, but there were certain questions of agricultural politics which they had a perfect right to discuss on these occa- sions, which were the only ones they had of commuoicating their views to their members. One of the first of those agri- cultural questions was Tenant-Right. It was all very well to try to put that down, but it must and would come to the front sooner or later, and would have to be considered. He rejoiced that tlipy had in tiie present Government a gentleman, Mr. Clare Read, who was a great champion of the farmer?, which ought to be an earnest that their claims would be considered by the Ministry of which he was a member. It was to be regretted that they had lost the parliamentary services of Mr. James Howard, for he and Mr. Read were in themselves a power second to none iu the House of Commons ; aud tiieir opinions were siiared by farmers throughout the length and breadth of the land. It was said by many who supported the Tenant-Right Bill, that the great cause of opposition to it was the twelfth claui-e, and that that clause would have to be altered. He believed, however, that both the farmers of this neighbourhood and of every county in England were of opinion tliat in any efficient Tenant-Right Bill that clause must be maintained, though his friend John Treadwell and he had differed upon it on several occasions. It was quite true that tenants might remain under the same landlord all their lives, but if they were tenants at will they were always liable to be turned out, of which what occurred on the very estate on which Mr. Treadwell was tenant was an instance. The pro- perty had changed hands, and Mr. Treadwell and all the other farmers upon it might have had notice to quit, if it had not fallen into the hands of one of the best families in this king- dom or any other. Tiie estate might have been purchased by some northern manufacturing millionaire, whose only thouglit was to screw as large an interest as he could on his invest- ment, and therefore both its tenants and the neighbourhood might congratulate themselves upon the coming amongst them of another member of a family whose kindness and liberality were so well known throughout the district. He contended, however, for all that, that that the tenant-farmers would never be in the position they ought to be so long as they were liable, at sis months' notice, to be turned out of their farms without compensation for any improvements they might have made in them. He asked the gentlemen who were now present, and who were representatives of both the great political parties, to give this subject their careful attention, for he was quite sure it deserved it. Then there was the labour questiou. That was, perhaps, hardly a subject for legislation, but it had forced itself upon them. For his own part he thoughi the labourers had been down-trodden too long, and that their wages had been too small. He thought that the great rise which had taken place in the value of money during tlie last twenty years should also have raised the value of labour, and therefore the question was a pressing and important one, even though it one with which the legislature could have little to do directly. As, however, it had been proposed by one of the members of the county to introduce Mr. Arch to members of the then Government, it was evident that he must have received some support from those members themselves, and he would ask them to give the same attention to the labour subject as they would give to others. Mr. M. N. De Rothschild, the chairman, said his friend Fowler, as they all knew, was much in the habit of riding his hobby to death — sometimes the Malt-tax — sometimes compensa- tion to farmers. After all, however, agriculture in England was flourishing, as it flourished in no other country. As a proof he would point to those agricultural implements which far- mers did not now know how to dispense with. He doubted if in any other part of the world the science of agriculture had made the strides it had in this country, or was upon the whole so flourishing. A great many loose statements had been made lately about the waste lands of the country, and it was said that these waste lands were held by the landlords and kept out of cultivation for their own purposes. He had looked over the blue books and found the statistics upon that subject required some consideration. They had been told that there were seven millions of acres of Wdste lands in the kingdom, of which five millions were iu the six northern counties. In reality, however, there were not more than four millions, the remainder being occupied by houses and gardens, in towns, and by-roads, hedges, railways, and canals. He mentioned this because it always struck him that the proposal to cut up the country into small farms and allotments would not, after all, tend to increase the actual productiveness of the soil, but, on the contrary, would rather diminish it. Mr. J. Treadwei,l was emphatically what his friend Mr. Paxton would call " a showman," for he believed thorouglily in agricultural show-f. He knew some farmers were of a dif- ferent opinion, but he would ask tiiem how any man could look into the shoivyard, and see the competing animals, with- out coming to the couclusiou that competition must of neces- sity ttud to improve the stock of the district. He believed when people went to a show, and there saw animals calculated to improve their own stock, they would be induced to pur- chase them for that purpose, and he was certain that since these shows had become so numerous, stock had been very much improved. He could not believe when they saw those Shorthorns, and sheep, and pigs, they would not themselves lik"; to possess them, and be induced to make exertions to equal, and if possible, surpass them in the animals on tlieir own farms. That was in his opinion one of the great ad- vantages of these shows. There was another way in which agricultural shows did good. They brought together the far- mers aud gentlemen of the district. He always rejoiced to see the country gentlemen present, especially when tliey were of the right sort, and should liave been very much pleased if they had had more at the present meeting. He was not going to follow his friend Fowler into matters which he tliought had better be discussed elsewhere, but there was one thing which was worth touching upon, and that was the ques- tion of waste lands. From what he had seen of the returns on that subject, he thought they were most fallacious and misleading. Ouly lately he had seen in a return of the waste lands in this county, a statement of waste lands in a parish where he knew they had been enclosed and in cultivation for years and years. If one item was wrong, others might be wrong also, and the return would be really worth nothing at all. He was glad the President had mentioned that subject, because it gave him an opportunity of saying a few words on it, and of expressing the opinion that the sooner all ideas de- rived from those returns were exploded, the better. Mr. G. Street did not know that anything gave him more pleasure than the success of his men in the competition for the prizes for length of servitude. They had taken about £25 for length of service within little more than a week. When so much had been said about the way in which farmers treated their men, that was a fact which gave him special pleasure. Those men had attended tiis show, two of them all the way from Maulden, at some inconvenience to himself, to receive the prizes the Bucks Association had so liberally offered. He had also been much pleased with some of the remarks which had been made about waste land. They had heard a great deal about waste lands, and a good deal had been said about Government taking them into its own hand, and allotting them lor cottage cultivation by the labourers. It was said by that means a larger amount of crops would be raised for the benefit of the nation, but he had a most de- cided view that there was no country in Europe better culti- vated than England, and he believed under no system of land management would it be likely to produce more. A HARVEST FESTIVAL.— The Rev. C. C. Sharpe, vicar of Bucknell, Shropshire, was charged before the county magistrates at I3ishop's Castle, with liaving rX a harvest festival for his parish sold ale a; a supper which took place in the schoolroom. On the 9tli September Mr. Sharpe had thanksgiving services in his church in the morning, and in the evening a supper took place. Tickets were sold at half- a-crown each, and during and after the supper the guests v.'ere supplied with ale. F'or the defence it was alleged that Mr Sharpe was ignorant of the law, and that if he had broken it at all, he had not done it wilfully or with the object of making a profit out of the sale of the beer. The defendant was ordered to pay a fine of Is. and 12s. costs, and the chairmau said he thought the charge a bit of sharp practice. 374 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. THE DERBYSHIRE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY. MEETING AT DERBY. There were a good many vacancies iu some of the cattle classes, which it is supposed were owing to the prevalence of the foot-and-mouth disease. A fat ox, shown by Mr. Towle, of Draycott Hall, was the pro- minent feature of the show. The horses were numerous, and the hunter, hack, and harness classes were well filled ; three classes being specially commended by the judges. The show of dairy stock was small, with only four competitors for the three prizes for lots of four cows, and one in the pairs of dairy cows. Mr. Chamberlain took first prize with a good bull and three useful dairy cows, and Mr. J. Langley second. There was a fair show of sheep, both of loug and shortwoolled ; and amongst the latter Mr. Baker stands pre-eminent with his Shropshires. He was first and second in breeding ewes, first and third in the theaves, first in the ewe lambs, the only exhibitor in the aged rams, third in the shear- lings, and first and second in the ram lambs. Of pigs the entries were not sufficient to fill all the pens allotted to the departments ; and the entries of cheese were scarcely equal in number to former years. For factory cheese the judges awarded the prize to the cheese made at Mickleover, and two guineas were given to each of the factories at Derby and Longford, and one to the Holme Factory. There was but little competition in wool, there being only five competitors for the prize for longwool, and two for that for shortwools. PRIZE LIST. JUDGES.— Cattle : J. Widdowson, Hucknall Torkard ; R. Hall, Borough Fields, Walton-on -Trent. Aguicultukal Horses : J. JMauning, OrlinKbury ; — Saint, Alkraoutou. Hunters and Hacks : — Grummett, Westby, Grantham ; — Colton, Newark. Sheep and Pigs : H. Budding, Pantou House, Wragby ; C. Keeling, Yew Tree Farm, Penkridge. Roots and Grain: S. Robson, Melbourne; U. Sowter, Derby. Cheese and Butter : G. Smith,' High-street, Barton ; — Daniels, Ashby. Lmplements : — Abell, Engineer, Derbv ; E. G. James, Thurlston ; J. Rose, The Ash. CATTLE. DAIRY CATTLE. Four COWS for dairying purposes, belonging to members keeping more than twenty cows ; tliey must have calved be- tween the 1st of January and 1st of May. Also a silver cup, value £5. — First prize, T. H. Cakes, Riddings House ; second, W. T. Carringtou, Crosden Abbey ; third, M. T. Hopkinson, Woodthorpe, Tupton. Two cows for dairying purposes, belonging to members not keeping more than twenty cows. — Prize, E. Vale, Rose Hill. Pure-bred Shorthorned cow, having had a living calf since January 1st, 1874. — First prize, F. Cartwright, Drakelow ; se(M»nd and third, T. H Cakes. ueifees. Pair of heifers under three years old. — First prize, E. Vale ; second, T. H. Cakes ; third, — Tomlinson, Alvaston. Pair of in-calf heifers, belonging to a tenant-farmer dairying not less than twelve cows. — First prize, W. T. Carriugton ; second, W. S. Woodroffe, Norraantonon-Soar. STIEKS. Pair of stirks, in milk, not exceeding two years and eight months old, belonging to members not dairying less than 13 cows, and bred by exhibitor. — No entry. Pair of stirks under two years old, most adapted for dairy purposes, belonging to a tenant farmer. — First and second prizes, E. Vale, Rose Hill. Pair of stirks under two years old, most adapted for dairy purposes, belonging to members not dairying less than 12 cows, and bred by exhibitor. — First prize, F. Cartwright, Drakelow ; second, C. R. Chamberlain. calves. Tvvo rearing cow calves, bred by the exhibitor since 1st January, 1S7-1*. — First prize, C. R. Chamberhtin ; second, C. R. Morewood, Alfreton Hall. Highly commended : F. Cart- vvriglit. Commended : S. Robson, Melbourne. BULLS. Shorthorn bull, three years old and upwards. — First prize, J. Rose, The Ash; second, J. J. Crofts, Staveley ; third, C. R. Chamberlain. Shorthorn bull, two years old and not exceeding three years. —First prize, A. M. Mundy, Shipley Hall ; second, C. R. Chamberlain; third, J. Brooks, Shottle House. Yearling (or not exceeding two) bull of the pure Shorthorn breed, most suitable for breeding purposes, and which shall he, and has been, the property of the exhibitor six montlis previous to the dav of exhibition. — First prize, J. Wood, Spondon ; second, J. Harris, RoUeston Park. Bull-calf, not exceeding twelve months old. — First prize, C. R. Morewood ; second, F. Cartvvriglit. eat stock. Beast of any breed. — First prize, J. H. Towle, Draycolt Hall ; second and third, C. R. Chamberlain. SPECIAL PRIZES. Bull and three females of any age, the property of one member ; any of the females above eighteen months, to be in milk or iu calf at tbe time of show. — First prize, C. R. Chamberlain ; second, J. Langley, Derby. HORSES. Brood mare and foal for agricultural purposes. — First prize, H. Thompson, Chilwell ; second, W. Hollingworth, Dale Abbey ; third, S. Porter, Locko. Highly commended : W. Hollingworth. Commended : M. Audinwood, Weston. Two years old gelding for aaricultural purposes. — First prize, W. Hollingworth ; second, M. Audinwood, jun. Highly commended : J. Crammer, Sawley. Commended : J. Hawks- worth, Barton Fields. Two years old filly far agricultural purposes. — First prize, T. Orme, Boon ; second, J. Hawsworth. Pair of horses for agricultural purposes. — First prize, J. Porter, Weston-on-Trent ; second and third, C. R. Chamber- lain. Highly commended : J. Poyser, Swarkestone. Brood mare, best fitted for breeding hunters and hacks, with foal at her foot. — First prize, E. Harrison, AUestree ; second, P. Wallis, Derby. Commended : S. J. Clay, Long Eaton. Hack above four years. — First prize, J. J. Crofts ; second, H. BuUen, Ashby. Harness horse above four years old. — First prize, J. Mayer i!, Derby ; second, W. R. Dick, Ticknall. Gelding or filly, of the value of ^£50, not thoroughbicj, above three and under four years old. — First prize, M. Audin- wood, sen ; second, C. Smith, Kirk Langley. Highly com- mended : T. Cowley, Smisby. Two years old for hunting purposes. — First prize, W. Parker, Alvaston ; second, T. Martin, Derby. The class com- mended. Cob not exceeding 14r hands. — First prize, C. Smith ; second, A. Ford, Quarndon. Highly commended : C. Jordan, Thulston. Hunter four years old and upwards, equal to 15 stone. — First prize, J. Hanson, Burrows ; second, T. Radford, Cole- orton ; third, G. Meynell. Langley. The class commended. Best hunter in eitlier class, four years old and upwards, equal to 12 stone. — First prize, W. Bodeu, Derby ; second, S. Robson, Melbourne; third, Mr. Flower, Derby. The class commended. SHEEP. LONG-WOOLS. Five breeding ewes, having had lambs in 1874, and suckled them up to tlie 1st of June. — First prize, R. Johnson, Kirk Ireton ; second, M. Scorer, Scarcliffe. Commended : S. W. Cox, The Cottage; R. Syliray, Atnhergate ; J. Brooks, Shottle. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 375 il'ive theaves. — First prize, R. Jolmsou ; second, M. ScorerJ ; third, A. Bryer, Quarndon. Commeaded : A. Bryer; W. S. Woodroffe, Norraantoa-ou-Soar. live ewe Irabs. — First prize, M. Scorer ; second, A. Bryer. Commended : S. llobson, Melbourne. Ram of any age above a sbearling, bond fide the property of the exhibitor at the time of entry. — First prize, R. John- son ; second, R. Lee, Knivetou ; third, R. Lee. Sliearling ram, bona fide the property of the exhibitor at the time of entry. — First, second, and third prizes, R. John- son. Highly commended : R.Lee. Commended: R.Lee; R. Johnson. Ram lamb. — First prize, R. Johnson ; second, M. Scorer. Commended ; M. Scorer. SHORT-WOOLS. Five breeding ewes, having had lambs in 187^, and suckled them up to the 1st of June. — First and second prizes, W. Baker, Moor Bams ; third, T. C. Smith. Five theaves. — First prize, W. Baker ; second, C. Smith ; third, W. Baker. Five ewe lambs. — First prize, W. Baker ; second, C. Smith. Ram of any age above a shearling, bonS. fide the property of the exhibitor at the time of entry. — First and second prizes, W. Baker. Shearling ram, bon.^ fide the property of the exhibitor at the time of entry. — First prize, C. Smith ; second, A. Findlay, Wingfield Park ; third, W. Baker. Commended : J. Lea, Sudbury. Ram lamb. — First and second prizes, W. Baker. Five fat wether sheep, of any breed, not exceeding twenty - two months old. — Prize, M. Walker, Stockley Park. PIGS. L.VRGE BREED. Boar of any age best adapted for general use. — First prize, M. Walker ; second, J. Harris. Sow of any age. — First and second prizes, M. Walker. Three breeding pigs of one litter, not exceeding eight months old. — First prize, J. Harris; second, M. Walker. Commended : J. Wood, Spondon. SMALL 15REED. Boar of any age best adapted for general use. — First prize, M. Walker : second, F. W. Meynell, Coxbench Hall. Sow of any age. — First prize, M, Walker ; second, F. W. Meynell. Three breeding pigs of one litter, not exceeding eight months old. — First and second prizes, M. Walker. Pig, the property of an agricultural labourer. — First prize, T. Poxon, Alvaston ; second, J. King, Hartshorn ; third, J. Moley, Thulston. ROOTS. Collection (bonS fide the growth of the exhibitor), to con- sist of Ions and globe mangolds, Swede and common turnips, and cabbage : six specimens of eacli sort to be exhibited. — First j-irize, J. Greatorex, Stretton ; second, J. Sturtin, Hooper's Farm, Hartshorne. GROWING CROPS. Swede turnips, to consist of not less than three acres. — First prize, J. Smith, LuUingtou ; second, J. H. Joyce, Black- ford by. Mangold wurtzel, to consist of not less than two acres. — First prize, T. M. Ward, Craythorne; second, J. Grea- torex. Cabbage, to consist of not less than two acres. — First prize, W. HoUingworth, Stanton Grove ; second, J. Grea- torex. ' CHEESE. Cheese of not less than 1 cwt., made by exhibitor in the year IS?^. — First prize, J. Felthouse, Greudon House, Ather- stone; second, W. T. Carrington, Croxden Abbey; third, J. Brooks, Burrows. Cheese, of not less than 1 cwt., made by the exhibitor in 1874, to be competed fur only by those persons who, being members of the Derbyshire Agricultural Society, shall not have made any cheese on the Sunday after the Mth June, 1874! — Factory cheese, Mickleover Clieese Factory. 2 guineas each to Derby and Longleat Factories ; 1 guinea to Holme Factorv. BUTTER. Milk butter (not less than six pounds) made by the exhibi- tor.— First prize, A. M. Mundy, Shipley Hall ; second, A. F. Hurt, Ravenstone. Milk butter (not less than six pounds) made by the daugh- ter of a member. — First prize, W. Jackson, Atlow; second, J. Greatorex. WOOL. Three fleeces of long vpool. — Prize, R. Johnson, Kirk Ireton. Three fleeces of short wool. — Prize, J. Rose, The Asli, Etwall. GRAIN. Sample of red wheat, three bushels, and to represent a bulk of not less than ten quarters, to be subject to the inspection of the judges. — Prize, J. Greatorex. Sample of white wheat. — First prize, J. Greatorex; second, W. Woodrofi'e. Sample of barley. — Prize, J. Greatorex. Sample ot oats. — First prize, J. Greatorex ; second, J. Startin. AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS. Selection of implements for agricultural purposes. — First prize, J. and G. Haywood, Derby ; second, G. Ratcliffe, Derby. Messrs. Ratditt" and Co. also obtained a silver medal for a reaper, the inventor of which was Mr. Earl, of Melbourne. A medal was also awarded to Messrs. Hathaway, Chippenham, for a churn. At the dinner. Lord Scarsdale, the chairman, believed he might congratulate all present upon having witnessed a very good show. The cattle classes were unfortunately short in numbers, but he had been told they were very good in quality, and he was afraid tiiat tiie paucity of numbers arose from the prevalence of the foot-and-mouth disease, and very possibly from tlie shortness of keep owing to the dry season through which they had just passed. The show of sheep had been a very good one, the animals being large in number and ex- cellent in quality. He had also been told that the classes of agricultural horses had been exceedingly good, better, per- haps, than had ever been seen in Derby before. He should like to suggest that, if possible, a few more prizes should be given, and that the competition in some cases might be ex- tended, perhaps to all England. He believed that during the past year there had not been any papers read or lectures given upon subjects connected with agriculture, at the committee meetings of the Society, which was to be regretted for many reasons, and he hoped that during the coning year the Com- mittee would see their way to remedy this defect, if it was one. He «ished to say a few words respecting tlie great ex- tension of the factory system of cheese-making in Derbyshire, and he was sure it would be a great source of regret to all present that the Hon. Mr. Coke and Mr. Crotnpton, wlio might be looked upon as the founders of this movement in Derbyshire, were absent on the present occasion, for they would liave given a great amount of useful information on the subject, and Mr. Crompton would have been prepared with a great many interesting details. One great advantage which had accrued from the factory system of cheese-making was that it had opened the eyes of farmers to the value and im- portance of co-operation, and he hoped tliat was a fact which would not be lost sight of by them ; for he Ijelieved the co- operative system was capable of far greater development than it had at present attained, and might be of considerable ad- vantage to the farmers in their business. If it would meet with the approbation of the Committee he should be very happy to offer a prize of ten guineas for the best practical paper on co-operation amongst farmers. Another advantage arising from tlie factory system was that it tended to bring landlords and tenants together; they met together in com- mittees, and exchanged ideas upon subjects in which they were both interested ; it improved the relations between them, and it enlightened the one as to the requirements of the other ; and surely everything that tended to the benefit of the landlord must also be to the advantage of the tenant, for their interests ever were and would be identical. He wished also to allude to the use of the steam plough. He believed two of these iuiplemeuts were in operation in the neighbour- hood of Derby ; they had had plenty of work to do, and were likely to be kept fully employed, and he looked upon this also as a sign of the progress of agriculture in this county. It was a matter of congratulation that in this district they had 376 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. been free fi'om those disputes between employers and em- ployed whicli had agitated many districts, especially in the Eastern Counties. Certainly the wages of agricultural labourers here were higher than were given in some parts of England, where, he must admit, it was only right and proper to raise the scale of the labourers' wages. In this neigh- bourhood, however, he believed the labourers had been pro- perly and fairly remunerated for their work, and had been justly dealt with by their employers ; and it had always been a pleasure and the wish of the farmers to contribute to the happiness and welfare of their labourers. He only wished that in many parts of tlie country the labourers were better housed, for he believed that to be the source of the dissatis- tion which had lately existed amongst them. They were all aware of the extreme difficulty of cottage building in these days, and if there were only some means provided of building habitable cottages at a less cost it would be a very great ad- vantage. He ought perhaps before that moment to have referred to the abundant harvest with which they had been happily blessed, and for which they ouglit all to be thankful to Providence, and also for the exceedingly favourable weather which had been experienced during the gatliering of the crops. Bread would be cheap and plentiful, which, with the prospect of winter before them, would be of great ad- vantage. He wished to say a few words with regard to the sale of milk in this district, which had lately assumed con- siderable proportions. This was a very important matter, Jnasmuch as a large supply of milk was furnished from this district to the large and populous centres of industry, and it was very desirable that the commodity thus supplied should be pure. He thought the Society mii^ht be of use in col- lecting information in relation to various questions affecting the milk supply, such as the price of milk in various towns, the carriage of milk by rail, the best mode of conveying it, and the proper temperature at which it should be conveyed, so as to keep as long as possible. All such matters as these might come under the observation of the Society, and their investigation would be of great benefit. He had had pleasure in walking through the horticultural show, but he should like to have seen a larjjer number of entries, though the show was a good one as far as it went. In one corner of tlie horticul- tural show he saw a plan of the Mickleover Lunatic Asylum ; he did not quite underhand that, for he did not think that horticulture was likely to cause people to lose their reason. Mr. T. W. Evans, M.P., proposed " The Chairman." From the fact that he had lived so long in the immediate neigh- bourhood, he had had opportunities of knowing what his lordship had done with respect to his land better than those farther removed. He would, then, say that he had never seen any property which had undergone such a great and re- markable improvement as had Lord Scarsdale's during his possession of it. Since he had taken it in hand, great im- provement had become manifest ; he had just taken up draining as a most important point, and then the erection of houses, setting, in this respect, a most excellent example. By this means not only was the land made of greater fertility, and tenants enabled to benefit by this greater power of production, but it was of advantage to the entire community. Mr. Coleman had been struck with the greater prominence and merit lately assumed by the cart-horse, which was now regarded as of more importance to the farmers. Competi- tion must improve the articles brought together; if a man thought his things were better than anyone else's there was nothing like letting him compare them with his neighbours'. As to the Mickleover cheese factory, tiiey might not go to Mickleover for the greatest sense in all matters, but when they found that cheese from that place could produce 86s. 6d. at sis weeks of age, they would see that it could do some thing. Mr. Alderman Roe was of opinion that the operations of the Society ouglit to be extended, and recommended that the show should be open to all England ; the horticultural de- partment was not successful until a similar step was taken with regard to it. He recommended that a prize should not be awarded when only one animal was exhibited in any class, believing that that would tend to cause a larger number of entries, neither would he allow a person to take a prize above once for the same animal. Mr. M. Walker here interposed, and said the nearer the Society confined its operations to the county the better. As an exhibitor of this Society, and a travelling exhibitor visiting many shows in the country, he could say that those county societies which opened their exhibitions to all England, were all going to the ground. Last year he did not exhibit any pigs at the county show, and he believed it was in conse- quence of that circumstance that there was such a good show of pigs that day. He had observed to some of his neighbours that he must " sweep the deck " of prizes, and if he had done so he should not have come to the show again, preferring to allow other persons to have an opportunity of gaining the prizes, for when it was known that such competitors as him- self, whether in the cattle or pig classes, were about to exhibit, it prevented outsiders from competing. Shropshire sheep were not so well represented as they ought to be, which he attributed to the fact of Mr. Baker taking the whole of the prizes in that class. [Mr. Walker was about to make some further observations when there were loud cries of " Chair" and his Lordship requested Mr. Walker to give way.] THE NORFOLK CATTLE PLAGUE ASSOCIATION. — A testimonial was never better earned than the one which has been voted by the Norfolk Cattle Plague Association to their chairman, Mr. Clare Sewell Read, M.P. The work of the Association is happily now a thing of the past, but the Committee know how indefatigably Mr. Read worked when the occasion required, and how well he won a title to a recognition of his services. We cannot conceive it possible that any single member of the Association will demur to the course adopted, with respect to a small portion of their money, not only with reference to the presentation to Mr. Read, but also the de- served acknowledgment to the painstaking secretary, Mr. C. R. Oilman ; and can only hope that the occasion will not again arise to call for the disturbance of the large amount now vested in the Funds. — The Norfolk Chronicle. TENANT-RIGHT FOR SCOTLAND.— At a dinner and presentation to Mr. Davidson, late farmer, Culbae, Wigtown- shire, in responding for the tenant-farmers of Wigtownshire, Mr. M 'Cracken said that in his recollection, through enterprise, energy, and the appication of manure, , the tenant-farmers of the district had many times multiplied their capital. Their stock had so much increased in value, and they had to expend so much more in labour, manure, and implements, that the capital has increased perhaps four-fold in many farms ; and, there- fore, these tenants should have a far greater securitv for that capital than they iiave. The circumstance that had brought them together that night was one of the strongest proofs that they could have of the necessity for that security. If they had a law in the country to give a tenant compensation for his improvements, he qoestioued very much if they would have seen their friend Mr. Davidson going out of the country. He could recollect seeing when a boy bogs and banksof briars and thorns on the farm of which their guest was lately tenant, and now on the same farm there had sprung up smooth green pasture. And as far as he could understand, all that was done at Mr. Davidson's own expense. Certainly in these circumstances, a man's labour and improvements ought to be taken into account, or the State, in some shape or other, should step in to protect him from being turned to the road without any consideration for the improvements he has effected. If we had a lawgiving compensation for these improvements, then the agriculture of the country could go on steadily. There was an old saying in his part of the country, " He that stints, sits ; and he that improves, ilits." He thought if tenant-farmers would only set themselves to examine that question, and re- member it when certain gentlemen come round asking Par- lamentary favours, he thought they might come to bring about an improvement on that point. THE FARMEE'S MAGAZINE. 377 AYESHIRE FARMEES' CLUB. ' THE KELATIONS OF LANDLOKD AND TENANT. At the annual meeting, held in Ayr, Mr. J. P. Willison, Maxwellton, in the chair, the subject for discussion was, " The Present Relations between Landlord and Tenant." The Chairman read the following paper : The earliest in- formation history gives of the cultivators of the soil teUs us that they were in a state of villenage or slavery, and at the unlimited disposal of the ownnrs of the land for life or for death. How they obtained their liberty is not very clear. I believe the Church of Rome claims the merit of getting it for t lem, and there appear no good grounds for proving that they obtained it by any other means. Their next state seems to •^ ave been that of steel bow tenants ; tlfe landlords providing the farm stock and implements of husbandry and the tenants the labour, the production of which was equally divided be- tween them. In this state the tenants were enabled to acquire capital. With tlie increase of commerce and national wealth the tenants by degrees obtained the means to stock the land with capital of their own, and to be in much the same position in relation to their landlords as they are now. Yet this third stage, although similar in many lespects to that of the present day, was in others very much different. This might be called the patriarchal stage. At this time the value of land was very low, and yielded but a small income to either landlord or tenant. The tenants might still be styled, as they were in the second stage, " the poor bodies who tilled the land." The competition for farms was not great, and the habits of both lairds and tenants were much more plain and simple than they are now. it was very rare that an industrious tenant ever dreamed of leaving his farm or of a laird parting with an iudustr.ous tenant. The lairds might be said to dwell among their own people. There is much in tiiis stage that is pic- turesque. Of course there was much " scraping and bowing" on the one side, but on the other there was also much real interest felt and kindly communing. The tenant looked upon his laird as his only governor and protector, and the laird on his tenant as something tliat was really a part of himself. As wealth and commerce increased, and of course the value of land, the lairds began to see that the state of things was not good, and that, for the benefit of the tenants no doubt, rents must be raised, and they by that means stimulated to make greater exertion. None of us, I am sure, can find fault with this, because without some such stimulant no progress can be made in anything whatever. Our just complaint is, that while the landlords have withdrawn the patriarchal wages, they still continue to demand the patriarclial service. Now, this is hardly fair. The landlord is not now a patriarch, he is simply a land-merchant, who, according to the strict rules of political economy, sells his land in the dearest market. The changes that have taken place in the relation of the different classes of society to each other during the last forty years have been very great. No one class can be said to be dependent on another except the tenant-farmers ; indeed they may be said to be the only class that is not yet emancipated. As a proof of this, I have only to remind you of tlie contracts which we sign ; con- tracts containing clauses the like of which are not to be found in any other contracts under the sun, and above all this, we are expected to pay the wages of complete political subservience, aud to acknowledge at leajt by silence that the government of a landed aristocracy is the only govern- ment that is good. You may naturally ask rae " Where is the remedy for all this ?" I believe there is a remedy if we seek it in the right direction, but not in the direction we have hitherto sought. It is held to be a maxiiu that the interests of landlords and tenants are exactly alike, but before that maxim can be applied here, we must first find out whether both parties have agreed as to what is their common interest. I have no doubt landlords, as a rule, are anxious to have their land well farmed, but, unfortunately, they want something more, aud that somethiug is far more precious in tiieir eyes than the other. They want as much game as their land will feed ; and they want their tenants' votes at county elections. Said an English squire the other day in public — " 1 respect my tenants as much as any man can do, but if I must part either with my tenauts or my game, I will uot pact with my game." These few words of this frank, outspoken English squire leave nothing to be added on this head. The interests of landlords and tenants are alike ! Are they ? Let me recall to your memory a few incidents in Parliament and out of it. I shall not go very far back in time, and I think you will dis- tinctly remember them all. Not long since, Lord Derby told an assemblage of English farmers that the land of England did not produce above half what it ought to do under good culti- vation. I think you wiU agree with me in saying that if there is one man in Britain who is more remarkable than another ibr common sense, that man is Lord Derby. Lord Derby must have known that before the tenants could be expected to era- ploy more capital in the cultivation of the laud, they must first have some sscurity that they would reap the benefit. But Lord Derby did not tell them, uor, so far as I know, has he since told them, that he would grant them leases aud assist them in securing Tenant-Right. Very lately, Lord Malmesbury caUed for a return to Parliament of all tiie ground game sold under licence in England, for the purpose of showing what a boon the labouring classes were receiving, in being able to get so much cheap and nourishing food. I never heard, though, of Lord Malmesbury having called for a return of the cost at which that game was reared aud fattened by the English far- mers. I will here put a question to Lord Alalmesbury. which, I hope, somebody will be geod enough to convey to him. Supposing all the field fences over England were levelled to the ground, and all the sheep and cattle allowed to roam at pleasure, would their beef and mutton be a cheap food to the British nation ? If Lord Derby is remarkable for common sense, surely Lord Malmesbury must be remarkable for some other kiud sense. You will uot have forgotten a gun bill and a farm dog bill, which costs each farm fi.fteen shillings a year, and some a great deal more. It is the only tax that I know of on implements of labour of any kind. It may be said that the lauded party in Parliament did uot bring in these bills. True, but why did they not oppose them ; they can always muster strength enough to strangle a game bill. If the interests of their tenants are so dear to them as they pretend sometimes, here was a famous chance for proving it. Some outspoken people said that they rather liked these bills, as they would afford more protection to their darling game ; and cer- tainly they would have some grounds for saying so. Our member for South Ayrshire is a Conservative, but is said to be a very liberal one. On the eve of the last general election, what did he say on the game question ? He said " he would give the ground game to the tenants by law ; but would not interfere with right of contract." The honourable gentleman must have known that the English tenants have possession of the game by law just now, andvife all know what it is worth to them. He very much reminded me of the old farmer who, when his servant complained to him of his food, said, "My good fellow, you will have no need to complain again on that score, instead of giving you potatoes and herring, I will now give you herring and potatoes." Yet this is the gentle aian we have sent to represent us in Parliament. For my part, I have come to the conclusion that we have been altogether wrong in our way of dealing with the game question in trying to carry out what is called Mr. Loch's bill. I pay no heed to the argu- ment about the sacredness of the right of contract. There is not a year in which Parliament does not interfere with the right of contract in some way. In fact such legislation has been a favourite hobby with the landed party for the last forty years. They have carried it into ships, mines, manufactories, truck shops, aud almost into every shop but their own shop. We must confess, however, that it has never been applied to any class so high in the social scale as we are. Besides, I do not see how it might uot be evaded in some way as it is evaded by the truck merchant. Further, what can we say to the otiier working classes of the nation, who may well ars-ne, «s tliev do, that if game preserving :s an evil, by Mr. Loch's bill that evil would only be taken out of the bauds of Hie landlurif, and put into the hands of the tenant. We all believe, of course, that no tenant would preserve game to do injury, but still the argumeut is just euongh, aad we have no proper answer to B B 378 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. give it. They say, too, and very justly, if these Game-laws are so very oppressive, why not get quit of them altogether ? The power is in your own hands. Tarliament long ago gave you the franchise, and now, that you may act independent of your landlords, it has given you the ballot. If year after year you send members te Parliament who are determined at all hazards to preserve these laws, you at least have no reason to complain. I would have dropped this part of the subject here had I not read some remarks on this question spoken the other day at Maybcle by the member for Ayr burghs. Sir Wm. Cun- ninghame said, " Farmers seem to have forgot that tlie Game- laws conferred many benefits on the general public, who had a right to have their interests considered as well as the farmers. Tliere could be no doubt that the preservation of game had a great effect in keeping country houses occupied, for many such houses would be vacant if it were not for the amusement of shooting, which induced the proprietor not only to reside there himself, bat often to collect a large party to fill his house." Now I for one protest against the picture that we are obliged to draw from words such as these of the Scottish landed gentlemen. Is it possible that he can have no love for the hills over which he may have first seen the sun rise ; for the stream which he waded when a boy, and in which he may have caught his first little trout ; for the trees which were then like himself, little saplings, now sending out their branches high and wide to the breeze — an emilem of passing time, and well fitted to beget the reflection, " What am I doing, what have I done." Is there no allurement in all the charms of nature where nature is most lovely, a prize for which thou- sands amid dust and smoke are daily toiling, and which few succeed in getting ? High above these things, can he feel no interest in the people who work and toil on these lands of his — lands which though but yesterday may have been the product of so many bales of cotton, or so many tons of iron, yet a people to whom he is bound hy all moral ties as firm as' parch- ment could bind him to his acres ? Is there no suffering among them that he can help to alleviate ? are there none whom lie can help onward and upward ? May there not be some from whom he can learn ? If all these things will not allure and attach him to his country home, then, I say, away with him, he is of no manner of use here ; off with him to the jungles of luQia, let him have shooting and killiag to his heart's content ; there at least his sport will have the dignity of toil and danger. Sir WiUiara further says, "Every village carpenter, grocer, doctor, smith, and trades of every kind were benefitea, more or less, by the Game-laws, to say nothing of the benefit and healthful exercise it afforded to those who were in a po'^ition to take advantage of them." My answer to this may be very short, for I never knew of any village carpenter, blacksmith, or grocer getting twenty shillings' worth of benefit from the Game-laws, unless he was a poacher ; and the exercise of shooting being such a healthy thing there' must be a very few windfalls for the village doctor. Sir William must have been thinking at the time of some wilder- ness of man's making in the Highlands, where some cotton lord may rule over fifty or a hundred thousand acres, and where there is not a living soul but himself and his gillies to employ tradesmen of any kind. Again Sir William says, " There was also a benefit which should not be forgotten, the greater amount of occupation the Game-laws gave to labourers and working men, noi merely gamekeepers and g-mewatchers, but gardeners, grooms, and odd men." Sir William surely does not know that there is such a thing as political economy, and that all intelligent men understand and believe in it. If a political economist came to ask anyone here. Where is the product of your year's labour ? your answer would not be far to seek ; indeed you need hardly speak at all— you might only point to your stackyard, the mason and carpenter could point to the houses they had built, but I do not know what answer h-^ could get from the employer of grooms and gamekeepers. T ) be sure he might say I have enjoyed myself and got a good appetite, as for the rest, I suppose it is none o your business. When we hear the Game-laws upheld by such arguments as these, one is apt to feel more sorrow than anger, and no one who is not a bitter enemy to the landed aristocracy could ever wish to hear them repeated. I at one time entertained the hope that the signs of the times would have educated a number of clever young lairds in every county, and that they would have come forward and volun- teered to lead U8 and champion our cause, but so far from ' this being the case, we have experienced exactly the reverse. Many of the young reform chiefs have gone over to the other side ; and if we may judge from the attitude of some of the older ones at tlie last general election, they even have no great stomach for reforms in our line. This, I believe, is counted by some as an omen of great strength and long life to the Conservative cause. I do not share in that opinion. I look upon it rather as an omen of great danger, which if it goes on, must ultimately tend to unite the tenant class into one compact political body, and then I would say landlords need not bother themselves much longer about politics. When I think of the present position of the landed class, there is a picture that often rises in ray mind. It is that of a captain about to go into battle while the crew of his ship is in a state of mutiny. Whether landlords like it or no, the Game-laws must go, Hypothec must go, and Tenant-Right must come ; and if they do not wash their hands of these things, there will be a mutiny some day. One day talkative Boswell said to the famous Samuel Johnson, " Sir, flon't you think the people were happier under feudal rule than they are now P" " No, sir," returned Samuel ; " and the proof of it is they wished to get out of it, and have no wish to return to it." Burly Sam, sturdy Tory though he was, had too much regard for the truth to give his countenance to a falsehood. We have now no specimens of the feudal rule, but we may still look upon its offspring, the patriarchal. In some of the fairest and most fertile counties of England, where baron's castles, squire's halls, and lawns, and parks, are the finest — even where rosy, well-paid churchmen are plentiful, tell me how it is you will there see the land worst farmed, and the farm labourer a spectacle of poverty and ignorance. Naturally one would ex- pect to find there every man sitting under his own vine. Hodge, the other day, found fault with his beans, and rebelled against his master, the English farmer. Hodge had not enough of wind in him, and has been beat in the struggle. Now, it is rather an important question — What is to be the future of poor Hodge ! Is he to continue the same half- starved ignorant drudge that he has been ? No ! I have much better hopes for Hodge. I hope and believe he will emigrate to lands where he will find the fitting elements for his growth to manhood. This, too, I believe, is the best thing that could happen for the English tenants. They will then be forced to direct their energies to the right object — that of procuring leases and Tenant-Right — and will find out by-and-b}e that they have a somewhat nobler mission to per- form in this world than rearing game for their landlords' amusement. I doubt not many conscientiously believe that the government of a landed aristocracy is the best. Be that right or wrong, of this I am certain, it is a thing which we Scotch tenants have not the slightest interest in upholding. Our real interest is to get liberty to cultivate the land in such a way as we may find most profitable, and to get security for the money and labour we expend on it. It is clear we shall never get that, so long as we send the present kind of mem- bers to Parliament — I am speaking of neither Whig nor Tory. I mean that our work is just like other people's work, if it is to be well done, it must be done by ourselves ; or, as our friend Sir William says, " We may wait in vain till the ' crack of doom.''' The time is not far distant when no man, however high born or wealthy, will be trusted and followed as a leader who does not employ himself in some useful pursuit. It is for our young lords and lairds to look to this. If they allow the Government of the country to pass out of their hands, they may not get it back again, though they seek it with their tears. I do not know in this wme world a field lor work like that possessed by the British land- owner— a work, which, by all wise and good men, is considered the highest and noblest. He has a little kingdom of his own, which contains all the elements lor thought and study that is coutaiued in the biggest kingdom in Europe. He can tell his people, like Lord Derby, that the laud might be able to produce double ; but he need not stop there. He can say, " Come with me and I will assist you in finding out how it is to be done, and then I will help you to do it." I beg a parting word to the young men ot us who are just beginning the world. According to my view, the time may not be far off when their influence may have much weight for good or for evil in the destinies of our country. If they study with care the science and literature of their calling — if they carry into their business the utmost integrity, diligence, and skill they can command — they will find that they have received the best education THE FAEMBR'S MAGAZINE. 379 that can be got for giving efficient aid in the governraent of the State, Mr. Cunningham (Chapelton) was exceedinprly pleased with the paperjust read. The subject — the relations between the landlord and tenant — was a most important one, and he thought the tenants would do well to consult that relation- [ ship and on their part do everything that lay in their power to meet the views of the landlords consistent with the spirit of the age. It had been jnstly brought out in the paper that there had been something like serfJora in their profession. They were certainly now in a better position, and though he believed the most of them had good landlords, still owing to the state of the existing law it was almost impossible for a landlord to be a just man. There was the greatest need for au alteration of the existing laws both for the benefit of the land- lord and tenant. He fondly hoped the day was not far dis- tant when our legislators would see the necessity of doing something on behalf of the landlord and tenant, and therefore on behalf of society at large. He had not the smallest doubt the outside world was as great a sufferer as tliey were them- selves by the present system. J. B. Lindsay (Irvine) said that, to maintain a harmonious relationship between landlord and tenant is much to be desired, and is favourable to the prosperity aud comfort of both parties. Land as a subject of property, while capable of much improve- ment, is also liable to serious depreciation. It is, therefore, a serious matter for a proprietor to alienate from himself his property for nineteen years. In doing so he requires protec- tion, and it has hitherto been for the most part sought in the many clauses and restri<-tions of leases. 1 venture to doubt if all the clauses and restrictions yet devised will compel the improvement of land or afford the protection sought. I would respectfully suggest that a far more efficient protection is to be found in a well-devised scheme of compensation for im- provements, and not only would protection be found, but it would afford to the landlord a legitimate source of enrichment, while at the same time bring comfort and security to the tenant. Mr. Bruce (Aucbengate) said this question is one which requires to be handled with delicacy, and very carefully consi- dered. It is important that the relationship existing between landlord and tenant he liarmoniously maintained, and the solu- tion sought in a spirit of equity. The landlord has risks during the currency of a lease — for instance he may let a farm to a tenant who shortly afterwards becomes insolvent. As a set off to this, hypothec is at present the landlord's safeguard. But it is very doubtful if such protection is equivalent to that which would be gamed by a well-approved system of compensa- tion for permanent improvements. Under the present arrange- ments the land is too often deteriorated in value, especially at the expiring of leases. Whereas a compensation scheme pro- viding for the safely of the tenant's expended capital would effect an increase in the letting value of the land, bestowing as it would undoubtedly do, a reciprocal benefit on the outgoing tenant, incoming tenant, and landlord, through the most powerful of all motives, that of self interest. I am of opinion that if a tenant reduces the value of a farm it is proper that the landlord get full damages. Whereas if a tenant can show improvement he ought in equity to receive sompensation for such wlien quitting his holding. Mr. Howie (Law, Dreghorn) said that they were apt to expect far too much from Parliament. He did not see that the farmer could be very much bettered by Parliament. He believed that compensation should be given to the farmer at the end of the lease for improvements, and that landlords should receive compensation ifthe farm had been deteriorated. Mr. Wallace said the subject was one which was allowed to be a very critical one to deal with. It was a pity that is should be so, because there was a tendency to make niistaked about it. It gave rise to one mistake. Landlords were apt to think that farmers as a class liked to go against them, and tney might be a little selfish. It was a very natural thing vthen the proprietor did as they did — went to the market where he would get the greatest price. But he thought pro- prietors might make a mistake, and in some cases they did, in thinking too much of how they could deal with this and that bargain. If they wish to do it all to their own advantage, they would try to chalk out the bargain in such a way that they miglit profit by it. But the great deal that had been said in the public political artna, that the farmer was Rfain.st the landlord, only required to be tried, He thouht if people would look into the matter aud give it a trial they would find that the farmers were not against them, and what they differed upon would really be for the advantage of both. He thought the proprietors had the same interest, although they were in different circumstances. It w.^s natural they should have a great interest in the land, and for that reason great sympathy for and in the interest of the tenant. He was convinced that they (the farmers) had lairds who were ready to sympathise and encourage them, and though they (the landlords) mighrnot be in a position to give them money, he did not think it was necessary. The farmers con'd not expect them to give away money without some bene- fit from it. If they got intelligent proprietors — men with whom it was easy to deal, who understood what was a right and what was a wrong thing, and encourage them as far as in them lay by their countenance, it was a great help to them to go on doing what they could towards their land, and them- selves. He thought they should take up the question in a broad light, and not take any selfish view of it. It would ex- pedite matters if they were to do something to disabuse people of the idea that tney were there separately as a class. Mr. Dalgeish (Teraplant Mains) said one did not like to say anything about their superiors ; but still there was no doubt that there were great faults in their landlords in the way they conducted their estates, and the usage they gave to their tenants. But he had no doubt that by the process of riddling they would get as much hair grass and fully as many weeds among the tenantry as amongst the landlords. To begin to legislate he did not know would make a decided settlement. As long as human nature was as it was presently, they might look for nothing but faults and failings amongst the rich as well as tlie poor and middle classes. Instead of legislating to make alterations in the relations between landlord and tenant, he thought if they could diffuse a spirit of equity and honesty, reciprocal by both parties, it would be far better than taking np an attitude of force or defiance. At the same time it was necessary to have regulations to secure parties to a certain extent. But a tenant taking a farm for nineteen years uuder certain stipulations — that he was to plough under a certain rotation, and would grant that that rotation was actually the best adapted to the circumstances of the farm, that he would manure up to a certain quantity — he often found it — at least in the leases with which he (the speaker) was acquainted — to his own profit to go beyond the landlord's stipulation in manuring rather than to keep within them. And wlien a person took a farm they ought to calculate what was to be the consequences during the currency of their lease, and what was to be the issue at the termination ; and while they im- proved the farm, they improved their condition besides, if the improvement was conducted on a proper footing. At any rate, it would pay the tenant better to improve his farm during the currency of his lease than to impoverish it ; for the moment that he attempted to impoverish his farm he would impoverish himself. It was very far wrong to remove the regular quantity of manure at the end of the lease ; and in proportion as he withdrew his support to the farm he will withdraw the support from himself. He would advise, how- ever, that instead of using a great deal of farm manures it would pay well enough to take artificials at the latter end. It was perfectly natural in the increase of the value of every- thing that the landlord should look for a rise of rent at the end of the lease, provided that he was up to the times. For the landlords had their expenditure to meet as well as the tenant, and really he did not see well what could be done. Tlie matter must stand as it was, and they must take the good and the bad as they came. He for one would rather have our aristocracy as they were than have the lands put into the hands of the Government, and to submit to the supervision of the Government officials. Amongst very many of the land- lords there was the greatest sympathy and kindness to the tenants. He would be very dry himself in receiving the Governraent ofticial when he came round to see that every nicknack was as It ought to be. He rather thought they would not meet their case better than by letting things take their natural course. There was a great many faults that they might find with the management of and contracts in lands one way and another, but then, if they looked at the tenantry who were of widely different characters, it was a'.isolutely necessary that the landlords sliould Secure themselves against the con- duct that may be prHcti«cd by thorn, and the ca»e with rcgurd B B 2 380 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. to the landlords might be stated as Just vice versa. So it was not easy to lay down rules that would be generally permanent and good in their effect, so long aa society had so much selfish- ness mixed in it. Mr. Cu:>j:n INGHAM (Chapelton) wished to state that he thought there was no desire on the part of the present or any other farmers' club to injure the landlord, nor yet to have his land under-valued. He thought they could not be accused of attempting to under-value his land : he thought their inten- tions were the very reverse of that. He should be sorry that they should meet together to read papers and discuss them, to find out any way to cheapen land. They only wanted to give a fair field for the benefit of the landlord and tenant when they showed tliemselves anxious to negotiate or propose any arrange- ment different from what at present existed. It would be a mistake to leave such an idea unaasailed, because he really believed that in the present time landlords were as much fettered as tlie tenants were through the existing laws. Mr. Young (Kilwinning) said some people thought the present subject just a little too political for the Farmers' Club. He shared in.that opinion to a certain extent. His opinion in regard to the relation between landlord and tenant was that it might be improved in three respects, not only with advan- tage to the landlord and tenant, but also to the public. He was persuaded that the law of hypothec should be abolished, and the Game-laws modified to the extent that every occupier of land should have the right in common with his proprietor to kill all wild animals, which would enable him to protect his crops, which were his own, and for which, in his humble opinion, every tenant eught to have protection. The other point was Tenant-Right, or what was better called, compensation for unexhausted improvements. He hoped the laudlords would take these subjects into their consideration. He was satisfied that no class in the community would derive greater benefit from a change in that direction than they. At present, if the majority of farmers knew that they were not to continue on the farm, they did not farm in the same way in the last two years of their lease. The most of them carried that too far, and the consequence was that the proprietor had his land to let, and he was desirous of doing so with the farm in the best possible condition when it was found in the worst. He was glad to see that in England the large proprietors liad already admitted the justice of the proposals he had referred to, and were quite willing to give their aid in getting a fair and reasonable measure passed which would give compensa- tion for unexhausted improvements. On the other hand, he felt it was quite right and proper whenever a tenant through his negligence and bad farming depreciated the natural fertility of tlie soil, he ought to be compelled to pay for such depre- ciation. The chairman made some allusion to the Game-laws, which was the only point upon which he could not agree with him. He (the chairman) seem to have thought that if the tenants hid the right to the game, brobably they might keep a large head of game. Now, he ventured to say that not one in fitty tenants would try to keep up a large head of game. They could not afi'ord it, and were not so foolish. The game destroyed eight or ten times more than they ate. The only other point to which he would refer was the fact that the interests of the landlord and tenant were mniual, more so than the chairman seemed to hint. He believed what was good lor the one was good for the other. Mr. Cunningham (Shields) said the subject seemed one not very piolific of discussion amongst farmers. There seemed to be a teeling abroad that there was a danger in saying much or anything in regard to the relations between landlord and tenant, lie could not see why that should be so. There was undoubtedly uneasiness amongst the tenant-farmers in regard to this question. There was considerable discussion, writing, and talking in reference to those questions concerning the landed interest, and it was their bounden duty and privi- lege to meet togetlier to talk over those matters which con- cerned their welfare, and to devise means whereby the evils with which they were beset might be partly removed or altogether abolished. The chairman traced the relationship of lancilord and tenant down from the very coraraeucement, and he showed that early in history the tenant-farmer was in a state of serfdom, and if he (the speaker) understood him right he showed that in the 19th century and Christian land of Scotland they were in a great measure still in the same con- ton. He quite agreed with liim, and it was quite a mistake talk in such a way as if there were not a more independent class existing than the tenant-farmers. He denied that in ioto. So long as they were compelled to sign leases on the conditions that were frequently attached to them, tliey were virtually serfs. They could call themselves nothing else, and they could not help themselves until those questions in connection with laud were legislatively settled. He quite believed, and would verify the statement of Lord Derby, that the land of this country might yield double it did at present. There was not the slightest doubt about this if there was suSicient capi- tal, and there would never be sufiicient capital until they had security for the capital, and were placed on an equal footing with their landlords in making their bargains. It was well known that if a landlord and a tenant made an agreement, it was always one-sided, because the landlords, having the making of the laws, made them for themselves. In regard to the ques- tion of the Game-laws, it was^an impossibility to have high- farming and a large head of game. He believed that was thoroughly experienced by the late Marquis of Ailsa. He found it utterly impossible to farm well and keep up a large stock of game. Therefore, if they were to have over-preservation of game they might bid adieu to high farming or farming to pay. He believed very few tenants would complain of game unless there was considerable damage done. But what they had to complain of was that instead of any improvement in the young landlords it was worse. The hand dial instead of going forward was going back. It had been said that there was a prospect of this game question being settled. The party was in power who would do it ; and therefore there was no doubt that if farmers would just be a little more moderate in their proposals, and by doing very little and saying almost nothing, tlie thing would soon be settled. All he had to say was that if it was to be settled in the way in which it was talked about, they would settle it for themselves. That put him in mind of some strangers from a foreign country who were attending the Ayr races. They were amused with the actions of the light-fingered gentry who were endeavouring to inveigle a plain countryman. But the countryman was not to be done, and the strangers were par- ticularly amused at the answers he gave to the light-fingered gentlemen-^" Ye can play wi' yoursels." So it was with the party who were to settle the matter for the farmers ; they must do it themselves, and he did not think the farmers would be inclined to go into the matter. As to game being a blessing to the country, it was rather a curse. He believed there were statistics, but he had been unable to lay his finger upon them. He knew, however, the number of criminals these Game-laws occasioned. And they all knew that when once a countryman was imprisoned, it did not matter forwliat it was, he ran the risk of his character being ruined for life ; his whole life, as it were, was pilfered away from him by these iniquitous Game-laws, and the other day there was a case in point in Aberdeen where a very heavy penalty was inflicted, and the Slieriflf himself was obliged to admit that the penalty was far too great for the offence. The law that punished a man so iniquitously — for he had never been brought to see tliat the killing of a hare or rabbit was a crime — should not be on the statute book of a Christian land. In regard to what had been said about the Conservative party being tlie party to grant rrlief, and that the Liberals had done nothing, and it was not their interest to do it, he would read a game clause of a landed proprietor, who was a Liberal, auu also a clause of his successor on the very same estate, but who was now a Conservative. The game clause of the Liberal landlord was to this effect : " And reserve to the landlord the exclusive right to hunt, shoot, and fisli by himself, or any person having his power and authority." The clause of the Conservative landlord was somewhat as follows : " That lie shall reserve to the landlord the whole game on the said land with the ex- clusive right to hunt, and those having his authority, aud no claim shall be raised for damage done by game, and the tenaiit binds himself to protect the plantations, preserve the game, and, so far as in his power, prevent poachers aud others from trespassing on the land." He should leave that to any one wlio should like to judge which of the two landlords was likely to command the respect of the tenant farmers, aud those who had to do business in the way of land. As regards the other question, he was glad to see that a number of the pro- prietors themselves were moving in the matter, and they had good reason to believe that the Marquis of Huntly, who last year introduced a bill on the subject, but they knew with whit reception from the landocracy, meant to re-introduce it. He THE FARMER'S MAZGAINE. 381 was the more glad becanse he (the speaker) believed it was framed in accordance witli equity to both landlord and tenant, and would be the means if passed by the Legislature of im- proving the relations between landlord and tenant, and of setting at rest a great many of those questions at present irritating one another. Mr. RiLLiE said the statement of Mr. Cunningham with regard to the keeping of game on the farms of the late Marquis of Ailsa WHS scarcely accurate. When Mr. M'Call had the farm referred to, the rent of it was only £700, and there was a great deal of game upon it then. He had occasion to pass it frequently, and he did so only the other day, and the game seemed more abundant now than ever, and the present rent was more than £1,000, and the present tenant seemed thriving, looked well and smiling. The Chairman remarked he thought he had been mis- understood in his statement about farmers rearing game. He qualified his statement by saying that it was not at all likely that farmers would rear game, although he believed there were certain foolish farmers who might rear game. They must admit there were foolish ones amongst them. As to Mr. Young's observation that the subject was too political for a meeting like the present, he (the chairman) found the subject so mixed up with politics that he did not see how he was to separate them, and he could not do otherwise if he were to treat the subject again. This concluded the discussion. CONTAGIOUS DISEASES (ANIMALS) ACT. DEPUTATION TO THE DUKE OF RICHMOND. Te Duke of Richmond has received a deputation from the local authorities of the counties of Aberdeen, Banff, and Moray, within the Gordon Schools, at Huntly, for the purpose of hearing representations regarding the operation of the Cattle Diseases Acts. The deputation consisted of Sheriff Corarie Thomson, Mr. J. W. Barclay, M.P., and Col. Innes, of Learney, as representing the Aberdeenshire Local authority ; Sheriff Gordon representing Banffshire ; and Dr. M'Lean, Provost Cameron of Elgin, and Mr. Geddes, Orblis- ton, representing Morayshire. Sheriff Thomson introduced the deputation, and ex- plained that they represented the local authorities of the three counties who thought it desirable to submit to his Grace their views as to the amendment of the cattle diseases legislation. Deputations from the several local authorities now represented had met at Keith on Saturday last, and agreed upon certain suggestions to place before his Grace. As one of their number had been a member of the Select Committee of the House of Commons on this subject last session, and had much experience in practically dealing with the subject, he pro- posed that Mr. Barclay should state the views of the local authorities. Mr. Barclay said he should endeavour very briefly to state the reasons which the local authorities had in support of the suggestions which he had now the honour of submitting to his Grace, but before doing so he might be allowed to observe that the suggestions were not of the nature of theoretical obj'ictious to the cattle disease legislation, but practical difficulties and hindrances which the local authorities had experienced in proceeding to carry out the Acts and Orders in Council with efficiency. The first suggestion was that the period of thirty days, provided by the pleuro-pneumonia regulation, was not sufficiently long, and the meeting at Keith were unanimously of opinion that this period should be extended to sixty days. They did not say that even this lengthened period would be altogether sufficient to determine whether disease continued to exist at the infected place or not. Pleuro-pneumonia was in his opinion much more difficult to deal with than rinderpest. The period of incubation, or the time during which disease might exist in an animal without manifesting external symptoms, was sometimes very pro- tracted, and they had instances wherf; three, tour, or even more months had elapsed before the disease again manifested itself. But if the period were to be extended beyond sixty days, very grave hardship would arise to the owner of cattle, and it might easily be the case where one animal took it after another at considerable intervals, that the farmer might be prevented from removing apparently healthy stock from his farm for twelve months. Looking at the question practically, they were of opinion, in the whole circumstances, that sixty days was the period to which the control of the local autho- rities should be extended. The second suggestion, that the slaughtering provisions of the Act should be carried out the same in Ireland as in England and in Scotland, was, he be- lieved, by far the most important question which he had to submit. In urging this point, the local authorities did not assert that there was more disease in Ireland than in this country, neither were they actuated by any hostility towards the Irish farmers. Indeed, he believed that the slaughtering- out of pleuro-pneumonia in Ireland would be of greater ad- vantage to the Irish farmers tlian even to the English and Scotch. He was quite satisfied that he was speaking within the due limit in stating that the value of Irish store cattle was depreciated not less than from ten to fifteen per cent, by the suspicions which existed in regard to their being affected with disease. Experience had shown so strongly the danger of purchasing Irish cattle that it was considered to partake of recklessness on the part of farmers to purchase them, unless they had within themselves facilities for keeping such animals isolated for a considerable period from the rest of their stock. But Irish store cattle could not be dispensed with in the Southern counties. The farmers were as glad to have them as tlie Irish farmers were to sell them, and it was therefore very evident that any measure which tended to increase confidence in the health of Irish cattle would be quite as beneficial to the farmers iu Ireland as it would be to the farmers on this side of the Channel. The local authorities were quite satisfied that the disease in these northern counties was due to the import of cattle — particularly of Irish cattle — and he did not make this statement without being able to support it by facts. The local authority of Aberdeenshire had instructed their inspectors to investigate the circumstances of every new outbreak of disease, with a view to ascertain its origin. The inspector, in conse- quence, had iuquired into the various cases of disease, and his report was to tlie following effect : In 1871 there were 30 new outbreaks of pleuro-pneumonia in Aberdeenshire, and 11 of these were traced directly to cattle brought into the county. In 1872 there were 3t outbreaks, and of .these 15 were directly due to imported cattle. In 1873 there were 13 cases, and 7 of these were due to imported cattle. As stated, 26 cases were due in 1871 and 1872 directly to imported cattle, but it was found that other 21 cases had sprung directly from these 26 ; so that out of 64 new cases in 1871 and 1872, 47 were traced to imported cattle. The inspector failed to trace the remaining 17. Now, of the 26 cases directly due to imported cattle the cattle which brought the disease were in 15 cases from Ireland ; in 8 cases from Holland ; in 4 cases from England ; and in 4i cases from other Scotcli counties. He did not assert, as he had already stated, that disease was more rife in Ireland than in England and Scotland, but the mischief arose in this way. If one or two animals from an infected place, and containing the germs of the disease, were presented for shipment, no inspector at the port of shipment or elsewhere could detect the disease in its initial stages. One or two animals affected with pleuro-pneumonia pent up in the hold of a vessel, along with many different lots, might infect one or two in several of these lots, and so by only one or two diseased animals in a cargo, the disease might be coramunieated to the different lots and be thus spread widely over the country. The local authorities there represented had strenuously endeavoured to carry out the provisions ot the Act with regard to slaughtering affected animals ; and, so far as regarded disease within the county, they had every reason to believe that tliey would soon succeed in entirely exterminating it; but it was extremely discouraging tofindthatasthey succeeded in exterminating the disease which existed within the county, it was again brought in afresh from 382 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. other parts of the coantry by infected animals. He had reason to believe that the same feeling of disappointment was experienced in several districts of England, and he had no doubt that in the coming session of Parliament strong repre- sentations would be made to his Grace to rescind the Order in Council providing for slaughtering. He had been specially directed to state that the opinion of the local authorities now represented was strongly in favour of tlie expediency of slaughtering out animals affected with this disease. Indeed, the evidence taken before the Select Committee last session was all but unanimous in the conclusion that slaughtering, animals affected with pleuro-pneumonia was the most advisable course both in the interests of the owner and of the public ; and he believed he was strictly correct in saying that no diversity exists on this point among the numerous witnesses Irom Ireland who were examined before the Committee. As regards Aberdeenshire, the clerk to the Local Authority had prepared a statement of the experience of the last three years (which we give in the table annexed hereto, and a copy of which was submitted to the Duke), showing that the average cost to the country during the last three years, during which slaughtering had been carried out,had been three-farthings per pound on the assessable rental — one half payable by the land- lords and the other half by the tenants. The third suggestion desired the Privy Council to take measures to ensure the active and uniform enforcement of the law amongst all local authorities throughout tlie kingdom; and in support of this he referred to the figures which he had previously given, showing that of those cases of disease in Aberdeenshire a certain number were due to cattle from England, as well as from other countries in Scotland. The fourth suggestion proposed the amalgamation of county and burgh local authorities in Scotland. No doubt the burgh and the county local authori- ties in the counties which they represented had acted with great unanimity and cordiality together ; but such had not been the case in certain parts of Scotland and England. In a few cases the burgh local authorities seemed to consider that their interests were antagonistic to those ot the county local authorities. He referred to a case which had occurred in Scotland, where the county local authority had prohibited the import of cattle, but the burgh local authority had failed to do so. A large number of cattle was brought into the county to a market held within the burgh. Farmers brought largely at the market, took the cattle into the county ; and the breaches of the law were so numerous, besides being inadvertent, that the authorities tailed to prosecute. No great harm had directly arisen in this case; but when certain regulations were set at nought in this manner, it threw discredit upon other more esseulial restrictions. Provision would be made for assessing the general expenses over the whole district rateably, and the expenses of slaughtering would, it was contemplated, fall exclusively on that burgh or landward part of the county wherein the cattle were slaughtered. The fifth suggestion was expressing the desirability of simplifying and consolidating the Order in Council, and of adopting a settled policy in dealing with cattle disease by the Government, in order that the local authorities and the public generally might become acquainted with the regulations. Speaking generally, the local authorities were of opinion that the regulations and restrictions should be the minimum absolutely necessary ; that such regulations and restrictions as were imposed should be rigorously enforced throughout the whole country ; and that discretion should not be left with local authorities, but made generally imperative by an Order in Council. When the Orders were permissive, some local authorities proceeded stringently ; others neglected to take measures ; and experience had abundantly shown that unless uniform measures were carried out throughout the whole country, it was useless for exceptional local authorities to be more stringent than their neighbours. The carrying out of the Act was at first no doubt expensive, but experience would enable them to reduce the cost very considerably ; and if the slaughtering-out policy were carried out in Ireland, and vigorously throughout England and Scotland, he had no doubt that, within a reasonable time, that policy would be attended with complete success. Provost Cameron said that the amalgamation of county and burgh local authorities would tend very considerably towards economy, as well as to efficiency in the carrying out of the Act. Under the existing law, regulations had to be made and advertised both by the county and burgh local authorities, with double meetings and ofi^ciaU. There would be no difh* culty in one local authority administering the Act for the whole country. Sheriff Gokdon said some doubt existed as to whether sixty days was sufficient time to elapse before declaring an infected place free. The Banff local authority considered three months necessary, but he thought that it might be placed in the discretion of the Privy Council to grant powers to such local authorities as might want to extend the time beyond the sixty days. With regard to the amalgamation of the county and burgh local authorities, he was not aware what the opinion ot the Burgh of Banff was on this subject. He was strongly persuaded of the necessity for simplifying and consolidating the various Orders in Council, in order that Local Authorities might have no doubt as to the powers they possessed. The Duke of Richmond said he was very glad to have an opportunity of hearing the views of the local authorities of the three counties on the practical operation of the cattle disease legislation. It was his duty, as President of the Council, and having this department in charge, to make him- self acquainted with the operation of the Acts ; and he naturally, as a landed proprietor in each of the three counties, took a lively interest in the subject. With regard to the period during which a place was made subject to the pleuro-pneumonia regulations, that was not within his control as President of the Council, but was specially provided for by the Act of Parlia- ment. To alter the period, an amending Act would be neces- sary. The proposal to slaughter-out cattle affected with pleuro-pneumonia in Ireland was one of considerable difficulty. Amongst other difficulties he might refer to this, that local machinery for carrying out the Act did not exist in Ireland, as in England and Scotland. As they were doubtless aware, the Act was carried out from the central authority — the Lord- Lieutenant — chiefly by mfans of the police; and it was doubt- ful whether there was a sufficient number of qualified veterinary surgeons to enable the central authority to carry the slaughter- ing provisions of the Act into effect, and at the same time to secure the confidence oi the country. He had had the subject under consideration during the past session, and had been in communication with Sir Michael Hicks Beach, the Under- Secretary lor Ireland. He did not say that the difficulties which he had stated were insuperable. The subject was still under consideration, and he should be glad if he and the Irish Government could see their way to enforce the slaughter of animals affected with pleuro-pneumonia in Ireland. With re. gard tij the inspection of Irish cattle which had been inci- dentally referred to, he had, early last session, arranged with the Chancellor of tlie Exchequer for additional inspectors, some ofwhom had been appointed then, while others had been ap- pointed quite recently. He had been informed that the ca'tle were marked in such a manner on leaving Ireland that if any animal was found to be affected with disease, the mark upon it enabled the inspector to state the date of shipment and the farm from which the animal had been brought. If the local authority found cause of complaint against any Irish cattle, they ought to communicate with the vertinary department in London, in order that the animal miglit be traced ; but, as he was informed, there had been very few, if any, complaints of that nature. Dr. M'Lean expressed his belief that a very considerable amount of disease was due to bad treatment of the cattle in the transit from Ireland to this country, and certainly the confine- ment in the holds of vessels, and the subsequent exposure, would develop the germs of the disease. Mr. Barclay agreed that the evidence before the Select Committee last year showed that confinement in the holds of vessels, and subsequent exposure, developed the germs of the disease in cattle, but did not produce contagious pleuro-pneu- monia, which all the witnesses agreed insajing to be a disease of foreign origin, which had been brought into this country, and subsequently propagated and continued by contagion. Ordinary pleuro-pneumonia would be produced by exposure and hard treatment ; but although similar in external symp- toms, it was a quite different disease from contagious pleuro- pneumonia. The Duke of Richmond was aware that a very general opinion prevailed that the proper course to deal with pleuro- pneumonia was by slaughtering-out the animals ; but he might say that he had already had a deputation from Yorkshire, pressing upon him the expediency of rescinding the slaughter- ing Order in Council. He should be very glad if the variooi THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 383 local authorities could be iuduceJ to carry out the Acts efficiently, but lie iid not know what further steps the Privy Council could take to that eud. He should be glad to hear any suggestions on this poiat. Colonel IjMNES suggested that the slaughtering-out of cattle, with the view of preventing disease, ought to be looked upon as a national question quite as much as a farmer's one, and he believed that inquiry would show that disease, by enhancing the price of meat, was of greater importance to the general consumer than even to the farmer, who was recouped for his loss by the trifling assessment of three-eights of a penny in the pound. It seemed to hiin that it was a proper subject for con- sideration whether part of the general expendituie might not be paid out of Imperial funds, the Government, on the other hand, having some direct control and supervision in the carry- ing out of the Act. Sheriff Thoji.son said that, as regards the Government supervision, there was a precedent, to a certain extent, in the case of the police. The counties managed them, but there was a Goverumeut inspector. Tlie Duke of Kichmo^id, with regard to the amalgamation of county and burgh local authorities, thought that that was a proposition which might be practicable iu Scotland, but he feared it would be impracticable in England, where the burgh and county local authorities seemed to consider iu some casts their interests autagouistic. His Grace having referred to the question of foot-and-mouth disease, Mr. Barclay explained tliat, although the subject was not referred to in the memorandum submitted to the Uuke, it had been discussed at the meeting of the local authorities in Keith last week. The representatives of the local authorities there preseut_were unHnimously,of opinion that it was in expedient to attempt to deal with foot and-mouth disease by special restric- tions or regulations, and that it ought to be left simply under the operation of the general Act, which provided that persons exposing animals affected with foot-and-mouth disease in a market or public place, or by driving them along a highway, were subject to penalties. The local authorities had come to this conclusion, not because they thought foot-and-mouth disease a trilling matter — for they were of opinion that foot- and-mouth disease on the whole caused far greater loss than pleuro-pueumonia — but the result of their experience showed that any restrictions which could be enforced had little effect in putting down the disease. The restrictions might make the progress of the disease less rapid, but they seemed powerless to prevent the disease from spreading over the country ; and, indeed, it had been urged, not without a certain amount of force, that the restrictions were rather harmful than otherwise. It was considered that the more rapidly the disease spread over the country, the sooner it was got clear of altogether, as, like epidemics, it would in a definite time exhaust itself. The restrictions retarded the course of the disease, and by the time it had got over the country a new crop of animals had grown up to come under the influence of the disease. The local au- thorities of these three counties had passed the most stringent regulations in their power regarding foot-and-mouth disease, and had endeavoured to carry them into effect most stringently, but yet they could not say that any beneficial effects had re- sulted, and if any beneficial results did arise from the restric- tions, they certainly did not equal the trouble and inconve- nience which were occasioned by them. Dr. M'Lean said that the local authority for Morayshire, quite concurred in the views expressed. In their experience, ioot-and-mouth had not been a fatal disease. The Duke of Richmo2 i-H r-l 0 ■ 'i^^ 3 3S CO lO 00 ^ << -+ 0 00 ^1 M o > co'TfTi-r I-T ll H^^ , s tnS o:Sf^" t-co 10 0 ya M CO ^- 00 00 tH a5 ^>> 0 =c « « CO t- n_ ? ^a » 0 t «- -^'^ m 0 g « 0 •* CO t- •* -tJ • fiS 0 CO CO i-i 00 i ^PH'g < •^ Q « CO 00 00 E : =8 ; -0 "S r-H t-l fcT i^ -a : CO Xi J= 0 a a -2 =0 g fs -aq CO jj ^ ^bo ^ Ceo CO S-9 rH ^ 0 0 10 " 0 5 3! ; 0 *.■ ^ « 0 1 ^ >-i H 1 _; I in ■* 00 05 I— < O o CO Oi C5 CO CO I '—I CO Tp rH ~ in CD o ■* ci o OJ O CO 5 -^ -S ^ lO »o ?C|« STATUTE HIKINGS.— A circular on the subject of the hiring of servants has just been issued by the Howdenshke Chamber of Agriculture. It states that great inconvenience has resulted from the increasing practice of servants sending back their " earnest money," and refusing to fulfil the engage- ments they entered into at the statutes, which have usually been held about a fortnight before Martinmas. In several instances employers have sought redress from the magistrates when thus left in the lurch, but it has been decided that as the engagements were legally from the day of hiring until Martinmas of tlie eusoing year, they were not binding ttules» 384 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. put into writing, a parole contract not being legal or valid for any period exceedia^ twelve months. Much dissatisfaction has naturally been felt with these decisions, and the Howden- shire Chamber has appealed against one of them to the Court of Queen's Bench, but the case has not yet come on for hearing. The simplest way to remedy this defect in the law would doubtless be the universal adoption of written contracts, but servants, aud some masters also, have such great objection to signing written dooumeuts that it does not seem at all liljely it could be carried out. There are many objections to holding the statutes before Martinmas, amongst which are the loss of time sustained by the absence of servants so near the end of their contract, and the great unsettleraent and frequently recklessness and idleness shown by many of them during the rest of their time. The circular concludes by sug- gesting that in order to prevent this state of confusion, un- certainty, and loss, the statute hirings should all be held in Martinmas week. Three advantages would be derived from so doing. 1. The contracts would then be valid. 2. There would be no unsettled time between the holding of the first statutes and the leaving day. 3. A greater disposition amongst masters and servants to complete contr acts for future service without unnecessary loss of time. A copy of the circular has been sent to all the neighbouring Chambers, with a request that they will co-operate with the Howden Chamber in en- deavouring to secure the settlement of what is now a vexed question to many employers of labour in the agricultural dis- tricts of the country. LIVERPOOL. Compared vnth Bristol, Liverpool is a town of yesterday. It was late in taking a start, but a time came when the ad- vantages of its position and the energies of its people quickly placed it in the front rank of English towns. Not even Birmingham surpasses it in the prodigious rapidity of its growth and the largeness of its development. Very old men can remember it as a comparatively small place, and can trace its marvellous increase in wealth, population, and splendour emerging from a small fishing-village and growing into the second seaport of England. Old citizens still narrate with a glow of pride how rapidly the magnificent docks extended from mile to mile along the side of the noble Mersey ; how streets of miehty warehouses seemed to arise ; how in quick succession Exchange, TownhHil, Corporate buildings, hospitals, churches, and shops rivalling those of London were erected to meet the never-ceasing demands of this wonderfully increasing town ; and how, after having covered the Lancashire side ol the river with evidences of growing wealth, active industry, and civic prosperity, the never-sleeping energy of its merchant princes and great ship-builders crossed the watery barrier, and how a mighty town, with similar proofs of riches, rose on the Chester side of these waters crowded with shipping. Liverpool is one of the crowning illustrations of the commer- cial and industrial capacities of the English nation. A very brief glance at the past will suffice to bring us to the Liver- pool of our own day. The most popular of its many deriva- tions is that which traces its name to a mytholngical sort of a bird called "lever" or "liver," though no such bird has ever been known to exist ; but, in confirmation of this theory, the crest of the borough arras is to this day the figure of this identical bird ! Anyhow, it is bpyond question tliat in early times Liverpool was verv small aud insignificant. In the time of Edward III.— 1338-77— it consisted only of five streets. Some 170 years later, in Henry Vlll.'s reign, Leland thus described it : " Lyrpole,«i'/V7*Lyverpole, a proud town, hath but a chapel. Walton, four miles off", not far from the sea, is the parish church. The King hath a castelet there, and the Earl of Derby hath a stone house. Irish merchants come much thither, as to a good haven. At Lyrpole is small custom paid ; that causeth merchants to resort. Good merchandise at Lyrpole ; and much Irish yarn, that Manchester men do buy there." In Ehzabeth's reign the town made some pro- gress, but not much ; although Camden relates that it was then the " most commodious and the most frequented route to Ireland." He adds that it was more remarkable for ele- gance and populousness than for antiquity. In this and the focceeding reign the number of its freemen nearly doubled. There was, however, little promise of its present greatness ; and Liverpool was in the reign of Charles I. a very poor place indeed. This is shown in the ratal for ship-money. When these unhappy and mischievous councils prevailed, and the King issued his writs for this levy, while Chester was charged vrith £100, and Bristol at the then very large sum of £1,000, Liverpool was rated at only £15. And the High Sheriff of Lancashire wrote to the anthorities : "If you shall tax and assess men according to their estate, then Liver'jole being poor, and now goes, as it were, a begging, must pay very little." At the beginning of the Civil War Liverpool was seized by the Royalists. It was then besieged by the forces of the Parliament, who after a severe contest won it, driving the Royalists out with considerable loss. The fact that thi port was the direct route to Ireland rendered its possession of great importance to both parties, and accordingly Prince Ru- pert again laid siege to the place ; but it cost him and his army eighteen days, a hundred barrels of gunpowder, and the loss of some 1,500 men before the crow's nest was taken. la November of the same year it was surrendered again to the Parliament, after a siege of fifty-five days both by sea and land. During the eighteenth century the progress of Liver- pool was enormous. In 1700 the population was 5,714; in 1800 it had risen to 75,000. Mr. Leone Levi states that in 1773 " the population of Liverpool was ascertained to be 34,000. She possessed only three floating docks, a tolerably- sized basin, and three graving docks. The gross receipts of customs in 1775 were £^74,000 ; and in that year eighty-one ships of 9,200 tons cleared from Liverpool for the African or slave trade. In 1775 there was only one letter-carrier for all Liverpool, and the mail-bags were carried in and out of the town on horseback." This was the period during which the slave trade flourished and was a source of untold riches to Liverpool, which shared with London and Bristol the profits and the shame of this iniquitous traffic. When Clarksoa went on his merciful mission of inquiry, he found that, while eighteen vessels engaged in this trade sailed from Bristol, no fewer than eighty left Liverpool. He heard " horrible facts" from everybody ; the people were more hardened, and talked on the subject with more cool indifference than in any other seaport. This he assigns to their greater familiarity with the cruelties incidental to the traffic. The Liverpool people, too, were exceptionally bitter aud furious in their opposition. More than once the apostle of abolition was threatened with per- sonal violence, and on one occasion enly narrowly escaped from being thrown into a dock to drown ; and drowned he would have been immediately, for no one would have attempted his rescue. Liverpool was thoroughly roused in the defence of what she considered the most important source of her wealth and the most valuable of her vested interests. The earliest attempts to legislate on this subject were rigorously opposed by the members for Liverpool, who in this only obeyed the all but unanimous wishes — nay, indeed, the commands of their constituents. Mr. Gascoyne declared abolition to be unne- cessary, visionary, aud impracticable." Petition on petition was poured into the House of Commons opposing all steps towards abolition, and proclaiming that utter ruin would follow such pernicious and injurious legislation. Through the twenty years' agitation by which the abolition of the slave trade was preceded the influence of Liverpool in opposing the measure was second only, if even it were second to that of London. Liverpool was not ruined by the abolition of the slave trade, as its opponents gloomily prophesied. On the contrary, the town took a wider, a nobler, and a more rapid course in pro- gressive prosperity. During the present century her career has been one of extraordinary growth and development. A writer who is fully informed on the subject says : " Rapid as was the progress of the commerce of Liverpool in the last cen- tury it is more than equalled in the present day. Erom the larsje share the merchants possessed in the African slave trade it might have been apprehended that the cessation of that traffic would have seriously affected their interests. But it was not so. A succession of causes continually tended to open up fresh channels for enterprise and to give increased facility to mercantile operations. The most powerful of these was the \ THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 385 warehousing system, which gave all the advantajres of a free port to one possessing so many natural and artificial advantages. It was followed by the partial opening of the trade to the East Indies ; next by the introduction of steam navigation ; and, during late years, by the complete abolition of the East India Company's monopoly. la addition to these causes the rapid advance of our original descendants in the New World in wealth and population has called into operation the inter- course chiefly carried on tiirough this port. Lastly, with her skilful engineers and fortunate position as the outport of a country abounding in mineral tuel, she holds the sinews of that mighty power which is extending its conquests over the wide world ; walking the waters through storm and calm, and bridging the Atlantic itself ; gliding over the peopled plains of the Old World, through the eternal forests of the New, and as it passes along scattering in its train civilised man, his energies guided by Christian knowledge and by his expanding wants and national desires." In proof of this marvellous accretion it is only necessary to mention the increase of population since 1800. It was then, as I have already stated, about 75,000 ; in 1861 it was 443,938, and at the last census in 1871 it was ^QS.SiB — thus in ssventy years showing the enormous increase of 4-1 8,&46 persons. Figures are not always interesting read- ing, but in most cases it is only by figures that we can obtain anything like a comprehensible and accurate idea of th" extra- ordinary development of our great towns during the present century. The political influence of Liverpool has generally been exercised in the Conservative interest, but in tiie great Reform agitation a large and influen ial Union was founded, which co-operated with that at Birmingbain in its active sup- port of the hill. Petitions very numerously signed in favour of the measure were sent to Parliament, and a vast amount of Liberal enthusiasm prevailed. This was, however, of short duration, and in less than three years after the passing of the bill the burgesses returned to their favourite political side. The second general election alter the passing of the Act was in January 1835, and then, notwithstanding the extension of the suffrage and the enlarged register produced by the addition of the ten pound householders to the number of voters, the Conservatives headed the poll. Since that time the public influence of Liverpool has almost uniformly been Conservative. This state ol opinion in such an active community, added to the great change which within a few years has taken place at Manchester, will afford some explanation of the general Conservative reaction by which nearly tlie whole county of Lancashire was so signally distinguished at the last election. During the American civil war Liverpool ardently sympathised with the Southern States, and all her infiueuce was exerted in that direction. A large number of privateers were fitted out in, and sailed from, her docks in tlieir hazardous and illegal enterprises. Persistent but unsuc- ' cesstul efforts were made to induce the English Government to recognise the Southern States. At Birkenhead, a place which bears the same relation to Liverpool as Gateshead does to Newcastle-on-Tyne, Salford to Manchester, and Aston to Birmingham — in fact for political purposes the two places may be considered as one — at Birkenhead the Messrs. Laird built for the Confederates the vessel which, under the name ''Ala- bama," won such a notoriety as a privateer, and drew this kingdom into a series of ditficulties which at any moment might have led to war, and which ended in inflicting a heavy penalty on the nation. Beyond question, Liverpool must be credited with the chief of those acts which after ten years of mutual recrimination led up to judgment against us in the Court of Arbitration at Geneva. Liverpool is the birth-place of an association which is slowly growing in importance, and which promises at no very distant date to exercise a great influence on public opinion. To various large towns }ias been given the aceomplistiment of some particular public work as the crowning glory of its public life and history : to Birmingham the first Reform Bill, to Munchester the repeal of the Com Laws, and it appears all but certain that to Liver- pool will be given the no less important labour of system- atising and reforming our national finances. lu April, 1848, the Financial Reform Association was founded. Its objects brieily stated are " economical government, just taxation, and perfect freedom of trade." Its method is to create an educated public opinion ou all subjects connected with taxation, national expenditure, and the influence of imports and duties on trade aud commerce. To efl'ect this end tracts ou every part of our fiuaucial system, ou taxatioa in all ita branches, aspects, and bearings, its incidence and its application, are printed and widely circulated. Lectures on similar subjects are delivered by thorougiily well informed gentlemen in the different towns throughout the country. Leaflets on how the public money came and went in each past year, and how it is coming and going in the current year are published in large numbers, giving in the briefest possible manner the amount raised from the various sources of revenue and the way in which it is expended ; the cause and origin of the National Debt, and the way in which the public burdens have been transferred from the land to the Excise and other taxes ; while the advantages of a system of direct taxation over that of Customs and Excise are dis- played in the simplest manner. At the end of each year is issued the Financial Refo>-m AbnanacJc, in which is presented a vast amount of '' tabulated, fiscal, commercial, social, and political information," all relating to the objects ot the asso- ciation, and furnishing in a clear and lucid manner a complete history of taxation as it afl'ects the life and industry of the nation. Since July 1858, the association has published a monthly paper entitled the Financial Reformer, the recognised advocate ot its objects, which are : 1. " To use all lawful aud constitutional means of inducing the most rigid economy in the expenditure of the Government, consistent with due efK- ciency in the several departments of the public service. 2. To advocate the adoption of a simple and equitable system of direct taxation, fairly levied upon property and income, in lieu of the present unequal, complicated, aud expensively-collected duties upon commodities." In this work " political partisan- ship is distinctly disowned, the association being composed of men of all political parties.'* In illustration of tlie influence already exercised by this association we have only to read a speech delivered by Mr. Bright at a large meeting which it held in Liverpool, in December 1859, the views which he advocated being adopted as those of the association. The speaker proposed tne repeal of taxes which pressed on the bulk of the people aud ou precarious incomes, and the substi- tution of otliers on properly producing fixed incomes ; tlie abolition of the Income-tax, the assessed taxes (except the liouse tax), taxes ou marine insurances, fire insurances, and the duty ou paper ; the remission of all duties iroui the Cus- toms tariff, except on foreign wines (and that these should be reduced from 5s. 6d. to Is. on the gallon), foreign spirits, and tobacco. These proposals would have reduced the revenue by more than £26,000,000 ; to meet this loss he suggested a tax of 8s. per cent, on all persons whose property was more than £100, which would produce £27,000,1.100, or an excess of £1,000,000. As to the wisdom or justice of these proposals I am not now called upon to express an opinion ; i give the statement to show the influence which the Reform Association lifts had on the subject of taxation. Since this speech in 1859 the assessed taxes have been lesseued, the duties on marine and fire insurances taken off, the paper duty abolished, and the Income-tax made small by degrees and beautifully less. This epitome of the gradual change which is taking place in the public mind on the subject of taxation is a sufficient proof of the influence which this nuu-political association of Liverpool has exercised during its existeuce, and is, doubtless, a prophecy of still greater fiscal reforms which it will effect. Mr. Cobden gave his full adhesion to its objects. In all that concerns their local life and institutions the spirit of Liverpool is rivalled Oy few large towns, iind surpassed by none. In its public expen- diture the corporation, which is very rich, rarely counts the cost if it is necessary that a great work should be done. Over £900,000 has been expended in constructing the splendid sys- tem of sewerage, in perfecting which " no expense or care seems to have been spared." The Town Hallcostupwardsof £110,00(t, and the Exchange more than £360,000, while some £400,000 was expended in the erection ot St. George's Hall and the Assize Courts. All the public buildings are on a similar scale of inajj- nittcence, the charitiesare numerous andmuniticently supported, the docks are the admiration of strangers from all parts of the world. For some time past Liverpool has run a neck-and- neck race with Bristol as to which place should be the most heavily rated in the kingdom. The muuificence of many of her wealthy citizens is princely. A free Library has been established for twenty-one years, and in 1857 Sir William Brown, Bart., began the building of a fitting receptacle for the literary treasures of the town. This was finished in 1860, at a total cost of £40,000, the whole of wliich was borne by tne generous donor. The Report for 1873 is now before me. I find that at the end of that year the. reference library con - 386 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. tained 56,828 volumes, and durin? the year there had been 489,370 issues. There are also two branch lending libraries called the north and south : the former contains 20,031 volumes, and the latter 20,799, making a total of 40,830. The united issues of books in 1873 were 422,531. During the same period 42 8,501 persons visited the museum. A free art gallery has been greatly needed in the town, and, to quote from the last report of the free libraries committee, " an attempt was made without success during the past year to gain the aid of the council towards the erection of such a building, and subsequently offers of contributions were made by private individuals to the extent of £7,000 for the same purpose. The public, however, did not come for- ward in response, and the whole project was on the eve of a collapse when the Mayor, Mr. A. B. Walker, nobly came to the rescue, and immediately after his election to the chair on the 10th of November announced his intention of devoting the sum of £20,000 to the erection of a building lor an Art Gallery." Thus two citizens alone will have devoted the sum of £60,000 for the proper location of works of literature and art. The new building is to be called " The Walker Art Gallery." It is a fact full of healthy promise and rich in en- couraging example that so many of our large towns have been remarkable, not only for having organised and carried to a suc- cessful issue some one great public question, but having exercised a co-operative influence in moulding and forming public opinion on all questions that atfect the general well- being of the nation. This distribution of power and this influ- ence shared with so many other places render it sometimes a little difficult to trace accurately what has been the particular influence which this or that town has exercised on questions of public pulley, and still more difficult to point out its exact bearing and show its precise extent. In cases of broad political changes, such as the eff'ect of Birming- ham on the Reform Bill of 1832, of Manchester on the repeal of the Corn Laws, and of both places on the question of national education, the lines are very clear and dis- t pct. Liverpool has exercised an enormous public influence in various ways during the present ceutury, but not in carrying any particular law or in repealing any old statute by which lier name has been imperishably associated and In which her influence was parainountly displayed. In the discussion and settlement of most modern questions she has had a " voice potential," but it has been a voice united with other voices, and not so much a distinct and separate power which, acting alone, would have decided the fate of a measure or created and destroyed governments. In producing the great Conser- vative reaction which dethroned Mr. Gladstone and placed Mr. Disraeli in power the influence of Liverpool has been very great. It was mainly through tliis influence that Mr. Gladstone lost South Lancashire in 1868, and since that year the county has been one of the most active forces in giving a Conservative turn to the electoral power of the country. The eight members returned for the four divisions of the county of Lancashire were all Conservatives. In Liverpool the two Conservative candidates headed the poll by large majori- ties, Mr. John Torr, the junior member, having upwards of 3,000 votes more than Mr. W. Rathbone, the elected Liberal candidate ; ana but for the operation of the provision in the last Reform Bill by which no elector in a constituency re- turning three members can vote for more than two, three Conservatives would in all probability have been returned. As an indication of the growing influence of the Financial Reform Association it may be stated that Mr. Torr declared himself " in favour of a reduction of the public expenditure." At Manchester the two Conservatives were also returned at the head of the poll, and one of the rejected candidates was Mr. Jacob Bright. Liverpool and the county generally is well re- presented in the Government : Lord Derby being the Secretary for Foreign Affairs ; Viscount Sandon, one of the members for Liverpool, Vice-President of the Council ; and the Right Hon. R,. Assheton Cross, one of the members of the south-western division of the county, Secretary of State for tlie Home Department ; the Hon. Algernon F. Egerton, member of the south-eastern division, is Secretary to the Admiralty ; and the Hon. Frederick A. Stanley, member for tlie northern division, is one of the Under-Secretaries of War. Tiiis is pretty well for one county. But the appointments in their relation to the coKuty have been well deserved, owing to the great inflaence whicli Liverpool in particular and Lancashire iu general have had la producing that state of affairs which has made them possible. At the present time Liverpool is engaged in a public work of such magnitude as to partake more of the character of an imperial than a provincial undertaking. The extent of her docks is enormous, but the existing system, great as it is, is not sufficient for the accommodation of her ever-increasing maritime requirements, and it is now being extended in a manner characteristic alike of the enterprise and wealth of this great town. The extension of the docks now in course of construction is for the accommodation of the steam trade. The new docks will occupy the space reclaimed from the foreshore of the Mersey between the north quay of the Canada basin and the Seafurth shore. The area of this space is nearly 1,365,000 square yards, tiie length about 6,200 feet, and the breadth 2,000 feet. It will be fronted by a wall of enormous strength, which will be faced with granite. At the back of the wall a public promenade will be laid out, which will, doubtless, form one of the most pleasant and attractive places of summer resort in or near the town. The cost will be very great, and the whole work will be one more monument added to the many already existing of the honourable public spirit of the people of Liverpool. Visitors to Liverpool at intervals of only a few years are habitually astonished at the rapid changes in the town and the tokens of marvellous growth. Again and again have I been struck with amazement at the new street*, new buildings, mighty warehouses, and palatial structures which have sprung up, seemingly by magic, during my com- paratively brief absence from the town. This wonderful material progress of Liverpool — these manifest proofs of restless energy united with exhaustless wealth — produced a marked impressicn on the mind of Lord Erskiue. Writing of a visit to Liverpool he says : " 1 had before often been at the principal seaports in this island ; and, believing that, having seen Bristol and those other towns that deservedly pass for grep.t ones, I had seen everything in this great nation of navigators on which a sub- ject should pride himself 1 own I was astonished and astounded when, after passing a different ferry and ascending a hill, I was told by my guide, ' All you see spread out beneath you^ that immense plain, which stands like another Venice upon the water — which is intersected by those numerous docks— which glitters with those cheerful habitations of well-protected men — which is the busy seat of trade, and the gay scene of elegant amusements, growing out of its prosperity — where there is the most cheerlul face of industry — where there are riches overflowing, and everything that can delight a man who wishes to see the prosperity of a great community and a great empire — all this has been created by the industry and well- disciplined management of a handful of men since you were a boy.' I must have been a stick or a stone not to be affected by such a picture." These feelings must have been experienced by all who, like the present writer, have stood many, many times during the last half-century, and traced the continual growth and mighty expansion of this queen of English sea- ports.— The GentlemaiCs Macjazine. HOW TO JUDGE OF WOOL. — There is perhaps no defect which renders wool, and other wise good wool too, so absolutely useless for manufacturing and especially for combing purposes, as tenderness, or breachiness ; and it is my conviction that this defect is more general and causes greater loss to the country, through the puckets of our sheep-owners, than all the other defects in our wools together. However fine, or however much your wool in every other desirable quality may excel, no sooner is it submitted to the wonderfully acute and skilful examination of the European wool-sorter, classer, buyer, or manufacturer, than its deficiency in this respect is detected, and a price is bid for it scarcely exceeding that offered for hicks and pieces ; in fact, nothing is wanting to reduce fleece to that class, but the solution of continuity which is sure to take place in the course of the very first manufacturing process to which it is subjected. Except, however, possibly, in cases where neglect or mismanagement have been the rule for generations, it is not hereditary ; nor is any one breed of siieep more liable to it than another. To these conclusions I have come by re- peatedly finding an entire flock affected with break one year, and quite free from it the next, in couLsequence of a change in management. On the whole, it is to be feared that this defect is yearly gaining ground ; and I am credibly assured THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 387 that for the last two or three years we have produced more wool of this descriptioa thaa was ever kaowa before. Certaia it is that wheresoever this most objectionable teadency mani- fests itself, sheer carelessness, neglect, ignorance, over- stocking:, inordinately large paddocks, or scarcity of feed or water — each or all — will be found. When sheep get into very low condition, the pores of the skin contract, and permit only wool of a very fine fibre to extrude. Wlien the feed once more becomes abundant, the pores again expand, and permit the passage of a larger and stronger fibre. In conse- quence of this, the extremities of the fibres are stronger than their centres, and the wool upon the slightest strain snaps at the weakest place — namely, at the portion which grew when the sheep were in the lowest condition. But nothing is so sure to cause a break in wool, or indeed, in many sheep, a perfect stripping or shedding of the entire fleece, as want of water. It is not ouly important that wools should be free from the defects above described, but it is desirable that the whole of the various parts of the fleece should have as nearly as possible a uniformity of character — that is, as regards fineness, length of staple, density, and softness. The method of determining this quality of evenness is thus described : " Always assuming that the wool to be inspected is really a fine wool, we first examine the shoulder at the part where the finest and best wool is usually found. This we taki as the standard, and compare it with, in turn, the wool from the ribs, the tliigh, the rump, and the hinder parts ; and tlie nearer the wool from these various portions of the animal approaches the standard, the better. First we scrutinise the fineness ; and if the result be satisfactory, we pronounce the fleece, iu respect of fineness, very ' even.' Next we inquire into the lengtii of the staple ; and if we find that tlie wool oa the ribs, thigh, and back approximates reasonably in length to that of our standard, we again declare the sheep, as regards length of stiple, true and even. We next desire to satisfy ourselves of the density of the fleece ; and we do this by closing the hand upon a portion of the rump and of the loin wool, the fleece at these points being usually the thinnest, and faulty ; and if this again give satisfaction, we signify the fact by designating the wool ' even' as respects density. Now to summarise these separate examinations : If you find the fleece of nearly equal fineness from the shoulder to the thigh ; of nearly equal length at the shoulder, rib, thigh, and back ; and of equal density at the shoulder and across the loins — you may conclude that you have a nearly-perfect sheep."— Bulleliii Association of Wool Manufacturers. mOCULATION FOR PLEURO-PNEUMOmA IN AUSTRALIA. I may unhesitatingly state that I am most decidedly of opinion that inoculation acts both as a remedy and a preven- tive— as a remedy to a certain but not very considerable ex- tent, but as a preventive with great and almost unfailing effi- cacy. I am ot opinion that the chances of recovery for a diseased beast are improved by subjecting the animal to inoculation, and that uninfected cattle, after undergoing that operation, may be regarded as almost certainly insured against attack, at least for some years. These opinions are the result of a rather too extensive acquaintance with the disease in question, and to a series of experiences which appear to me to leave no room for doubt — experiences, I may also say, which have been purchased at a cost that renders me but too conscious of their value, and of which I shall now therefore proceed to give a detailed account at some length, becaune I am aware that mere opinions, however confidently or authori- tatively expressed, seldom convince, and because I am de- sirous to convince all such of your readers who are interested in this subject of the efficacy of a process from the adoption of which I have myself derived so much advantage. For these reasons also I shall not deem apology to be necessary if I obtrude to some considerable extent on your valuable space. The Clarence River district was for the first time visited by pleuro-pneumouia in 1866, the disease appearing amongst a herd occupying the run adjoining mine on the northern side, and having been introduced, as was believed, by infected bullocks among the teams travelling the road between Tenter- field and the ports of the Clarence. The owner of this herd, being a believer in the efficacy of inoculation, immediately set about to subject his cattle to the process, and being in a fa- vourable position tor obtaining supplies of lymph or virus, by the purchase from time to time of diseased bullocks from the teamsters passing through his station, he in the course of a few months, and before the disease had obtained any hold in the district, had succeeded in inoculating his entire herd, and with what result will be shown in the sequel. Not long after this first appearance of pleuro on the north, a partial outbreak of the disease occurred in my immediate neighbourhood, on the run to the south of mine, and a few hundred cattle occupying the infected locality were at once inoculated ; but the disease not appearing to spread beyond the limits of a very circumscribed area, and the owner beiug, in common with the majority of us, sceptical as to the advantages of the process, the inoculation was not proceeded with. Some animals died from the efi'ects of the operation ; many others were saved only by depriving them of their tails ; and, alto- gether, the immediate effects of the process were considered 80 disheartening, while the prospect of ultimate advantage appeared so uncertain, that the general feeling of reluctance to inoculate was rather strengthened and confirmed. Meau- wliile, the disease gradually spread, breaking out suddenly now here now there, ia almost all parts of the district, but confining itself in nearly all eases within more or less circum- scribed areas on the several runs, destroying but few cattle, and consequently not causing any great degree of alarm. Most of the cattle-owners tried inoculation to a more or less limited extent, but desisted, from motives similar to those mentioned above, my friend on the north alone going steadily and persistently forward with the operation. Matters went on in this manner for nearly a year before the disease showed itself in my herd ; and although I had during the interval used every means in my power to obtain reliable information as to the value of inoculation, I found myself, wlien the enemy was upon me, as much as ever in doubt. Inquiry only seemed to increase uncertainty. The investigations and report of the Victorian Koyal Commissiou had but perplexed the question ; and of all those of my friends who, by residence in the south- ern districts, had acquired some acquaintance with the disease, and whose counsel I sought, the advice of one generally neu- tralised that of another. At length, however, having resolved to make a trial of the operation, I early in 1867 inoculated about two hundred cows and their calves, occupying three difl'erent paddocks, and about a hundred young bulls running in a fourth paddock, in which were also some bullocks and steers which were not at that time operated upon. Symp- toms of pleuro had already appeared in some of these paddocks ; but so doubtful did I yet feel as to the advantages of the operation as compared with its risks, that I most unfortunately (as will presently be shown) decided not to inoculate my imported bulls, one of each was kept in each of the three paddocks first mentioned. These three more valu- able animals were thus alone exempted, while the cows and calves occupying the same paddocks with them were operated upon. After proceeding tlius far tentatively, and with consi- derable misgiving, I, like ray neighbours, paused to watch re- sults, and in a few weeks, having lost eight or ten of my most valuable cows from the swelling of their tails, and saved the lives of seversl others only by the excision of those useful and symmetrising appendages, ray doubts as to the expediency of inoculating became stronger, and I took credit to myself for the exercise of caution which had saved ray much prized Short- horn iraportations from subjection to so serious a risk. How far the self gratulation was justifiable we shall presently see. But the danger to be guarded against had not as yet assumed alarming proportions. Throughout the district the disease seemed to have taken a mild form, and had not been to any extent fatal, and we flattered ourselves that there might be something iu the climate or in the quality of the pastures of the district which disharmed the raalady of its sting, and'that here, at any rute, to have recourse to inoculation was to apply a remedy which might prove worse than the disease. Vain de- lusion, which by ill fortune too generally prevailed — prevailed till the favourable opportuity for inoculation had passed away- prevailed till violently dispelled by a sudden and devastating 388 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. spread of the disease, which caused all previous losses through inoculation to appear trivial indeed. This terrible outbreak was simultaneous with the setting^ in of the autumn rains of 1867. During the months of March, April, and May, the rains were unusually heavy and continuous, flooding tbe rivers and creeks, and rendering it nearly impossible to work cattle in yards, and very difficult even to collect them. During all this time cattle of all ages were dying by hundreds throughout the length and breadth of the district, the atmosphere was tainted by the decaying carcases, and miserable animals in all stages of the disease were everywhere to be seen. On my own run, over an extent of the thirty miles, the disease burst forth in every part within two weeks ; my three English bulls sickened and died oue after the other, many of the bullocks and steers running in the bull paddock also died, while their inoculated companions, the young bulls (one only of which had died alter inoculation) and all the inoculated cows and calves in the other paddocks remaiued unscathed. All hesitation, all doubt as to the value of inoculation vanished now, but nothing could be done, the continuous rains rendered action impossible. Week after week the awful destruction went forward, and we could only look on, and, from week to week, endeavour to hope that the worst had passed. At length the rain ceased, inoculation was vigorously proceeded with, and the plague stayed ; possibly the disease had now spent itself, and the remedy came too late. Be that as it may, the disease died away after inoculation had become the general practice, and we could then muster herds and count losses. These, as a rule, were found to be far in excess of the worst anticipations, reaching generally fifty, and in some cases even more than fifty per cent, of the entire herds. In my own herd the loss reached fully fifty per cent., and of the bulls running with the herd quite sixty per cent. It may be thought that this estimate of losses is excessive and erroneous ; that owners may have over-calculated the numbers of their herds prior to the visitation, but in the estimate above stated every allowance has been made for such over- Cilculation, and when it is told that after the plague had passed away the country so far changed in appearance that, instead of a fully stocked, it came to look like a new and unoccupied country, grass everywhere up to a horses' knees, and scarcely any traces or tracks of cattle to be seen. When it is told that in my own herd there was a fall from three thousand calves branded and weaned in 1866, to eight hundred branded and weaned in the following year, it must be seen that the estimate arrived at and above given cannot he regarded as excessive or exaggerated. Your readers may now ask how fared it during all this disas- trous period with my neighbour on the north, that sole and singular true believer of the year before in the virtues of inoculation. I answer that so lightly did the devastating enemy pass over the region under his authority and control, tliat while the rest of us had to compute our losses by thousands, he could reckon his by scores: and while the other portions of the district became, as I have already said, overgrown with rank grass and assumed an unstocked and deserted aspect, his run alone retained the usual ap- pearance of well-stocked country. During 1868 and the two or three following years, the contrast between the con- dition of this run and that of the runs surrounding was so striking as to prove beyond question how enormous must have been the diS'erence between the losses sus- tained here and those sustained elsewhere thoughout the district. I have not much more to say, except to give a description of the modus operandi, ys\{\<^, after some experience in the process of inoculation, was found to be the most ett'ective and convenient. Before doing this, however, I sliall mention that alter the destruction of so large a portion of my herd, I purchased for the partial re-stocking of my run five hundred store cattle from a herd which was said to have baen exempted from the disease, and which had not been inoculated. These cattle had not been six weeks upon my run when pleuro- pneumonia broke out among them with some virulence. The whole were immediately inoculated, and the disease suppressed, the loss not exceeding four per cent. One word more, and 1 shall have done with this purt of my subject — the evidences of efficacy of inoculation. Last year plearo-pneumonia again visited the Clarence district, and appeared in my herd. I immediately had recourse to inoculation, begin- ning with my imported and other more valuable animals. Of the former I lost none, and among the latter the loss was quite nominal, not reaching one per cent. It may now be well shortly to describe the mode of procedure which experience taught us to adopt as combining a suflicient degree of efficacy with the smallest degree ol injury and danger to the animals operated upon. The inoculating knife we consider to be much preferable to the needle, mainly because the former can be so much more rapidly applied as to render unnecessary the confinement and crowding of the ani- mals under operation to at all the same extent as wlien the latter is used. In using the needles, the tail of the animal must be retained for some moments in the hand of the operator, this rendering necessary the crowding and confining the cattle m narrow enclosures appropriately called crush pens, causing injury more or less serious, especially to the weaker animals ; whereas when the knife is used the operation is accomplished, in an instant, and before the animal has taken alarm at the ma- nipulation of its tail. Thus close crowding is rendered unne- cessary, and a yard of five panels by four is found most suitable and convenient. Into such a yard fifty to sixty grown cattle, or double the number of weaners, are admitted at one time, and the operator enters and works inside, not from the outside of the yard. In this manner a single operator, attended by a boy to hold the cup of virus, and a man to bang tails, may with ease inoculate five hundred cattle in the day, and without subjecting the animals to any rough or injurious treatment. I admit that with wild, rough, ill-managed herds, the mode of pro- cedure above described might be found difficult, that with such the operator might naturally prefer the outside to the in- side of the fence, thus rendering necessary a much narrower enclosure and a greater degree of crowding, but of such herds I have had but little experience. It now only remains to speak of the proper selection of the lymph or virus to be used, which though here coming last, is by no means the least im- portant matter for consideration. It is not, 1 think, generally understood that the liquid which (as all who have any acquaintance with pleuro-pneuraonia willknow),is so frequently found secreted in large quantity within the cavity of the chesC of infected animals, is the best and safest description of virus to use lor the purpose of inoculation. By the use of this liquid, instead of that obtaineJ from the diseased lung, the risk of loss from swelled tail is almost entirely avoided. In fact, the dangers attendant upon innoeulation are to a very large extent escaped, while the beneficial influence of the operation is in no degree impaired. Of this so little doubt is entertained in the Clarence district that the use of virus taken from the lung was very early, and, I believe I am justified in saying, very generally abandoned. In obtaining the liquid spoken of, care has always been taken to procure it in a bright and pellucid condition, but I am not prepared to say that such precaution is really necessary. In the virus obtained from the lung, pellucidity and a pale colour were so generally acknowledged to be indispensable conditions, that it was taken for granted that similar conditions must also be requisite in this new kind of virus or lymph when it was adopted, and, as far as I am aware, no one has hitherto in using this lymph thought it expedient to venture to dispense with these conditions. This description of lymph moreover is readily obtained in the required condition, much more so than the lung virus ; 1 have usually been enabled to obtain it from the first or seconl animal killed for the purpose, and have never found it necessary to go beyond a third. In short, I think this to be so much preferred to the lung virus, that I cannot too strongly recommend its use. In conclusion, I have only to add that should a perusal of the foregoing contribute to induce those among your readers who are engaged in the breeding of cattle to adopt a practice, to arrive at a knowledge of the great value of which cost me so dearly, I shall not regard as mis-spent the fev\ hours which have been devotad to the penning of this record of my experiences. — E, D. Ogiloie in the Rieerme Grazier. A DELUSION AND A SNAEE.— Chambers of Agricnl- ture as generally constituted are a delusion and a snare to tenant farmers, and so far from their being a means of secur- ing their just rights and legitimate influence, they are practi* cally the reverse. Joseph Arch, in his speech already named> perceived this clearly, and thus expressed his thoughts on the matter : — " They are not worth a straw to them, for if tenant farmers are to do any justice to themselves in their Chamber , THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 589 they must have men of their own class in oftice, and until they have they may ' Chamber of Agriculture' to the day of resurrection, but they will never make any progress." The reason is, the Chambers have been, and are, overshadowed, and their freedom crushed by the influence of the landlords, so that they have been of no essential advantage to farmers ; and they have failed to gain the appreciation of shrewdly practi- cal agriculturists who do not attend them, but look blank or shrng their shoulders when they are mentioned. The paucity of attendance seems to bk the most remarkable feature about them, judging others by those in this district ; but with one landlord chairman, another vice-ditto, and a land steward as secretary, there is no wonder that the farmers attending their meetings may, be counted on one's tiugers, though the surround- ing conditions ought to send them nearly as many hundreds. They would do so if they were really and truly independently farmers' Chambers of Agriculture and politically educational, as they ought to be if farmers mean to achieve through tliein their just rights and their legitimate status in the common- wealth.— Mr. James Hutchinys, of Banbury, in The Organ. SHEEP IN AUSTRALIA. The conditions under which sheep farming in Australia is carried on being very similar to those exist.ng in our Western pastoral regions, it is very interesting for us "^o learn something of sheep management in tliat country. This we may gather from a very interesting little work recently pubhshed in Mel- bourne, Australia, entitled " A Treatise upon the Australian Merino," by J. R. Graham, who lias beea a shepherd all his life, having been born upon a sheep-run, and is now superin- tendent of a very extensive " station" or sheep-run in that part of the world. From that work we gather the following useful facts : " The building up of a race of sheep is the work of many years. Twenty-three years' were spent hy the most successful sheep breeders in building up the pure breed of Australian merinos. Climate is of secondary importance ; it is blood which produces the desired effect. Hot climates can be used to produce as good a wool as any, but the breeder must not aim at large sheep. A sheep ' short on the pins with bodies close to the ground' is the one for hot countries. The moment the breeder aims at size he goes wrong. Feed will make mutton sheep out of any race. The merino, by proper alimentation, can be made equal to the Southdown as a mutton sheep. In breeding for size, the sheep must be born fat, and must not know a check from that period to the moment they are sold or slaughtered. Pastures for such sheep should be kept understocked. Crossing of races, especially with the Englisli sheep, is ruinous. Size is destructive of quality of wool, and merinos crossed with longwools produce sheep whose fleece becomes harsh and loose, and whose belly and joints be- come bare and naked. An acclimatised native sheep is better than any foreign one, unless it be the American merino, wnich, in Australia, is the best of all imported breeds. The best effects are produced by in-and-in breeding, with careful and juoicious selection ; and the more skiltul the selection made the sooner a perfect flock, able to transmit perfectly its qualities, may be built up. If a ram possesses the requisite (jualities he should be used even with his own dam. By this course the quality of sire and dam are both improved upon, and perfection is soon reached. The closer bred, the more even and regular a flock becomes and the more certainly the characteristics desired can be reproduced. By the opposite course a flock has been so run down that 207 fleeces weighed only 205 pounds. Fresh rams had been purchased each year for this flock, and rams had been exchanged with neighbours for the express purpose of avoiding close breeding. There had been no selection as to the needed qualities, and the flock was ruined. No improve- ment can be made without dividing the flocks and keeping only the best for breeding. A large flock sho'xld be divided into three ; the best for breeders, second-best to replenish the first with selected lambs, and a third kept for sale or slaughter only. Foreign blood may bring in some desired improvement, but generally with ^ whole colony of defects, and the greatest cir- cumspection should be used in bringing in i"..ch blood. Over- stocking a pasture diminishes size and brings on premature old age in a flock, for the short bite compels the sheep to take up grass roots, along with the soil adherinfr, by which their teeth are ground away, aud in four or five years the teeth are often worn to the gums. The wool is also deteriorated in quality. When feed falls otf and partial staivation occurs, a break or tenderness in the wool marks that exact period of its growth, and its market value is reduced as well as the weight of the fleece. Besides, in all pastures there are plants and herbs either noxious to sheep or which tliey dislike. In a bare pasture these are left closely denuded of all shade from other plants and grow and thrive out of all proportion, in time crowding the proper herbage aud taking sole possession of the ground. They also seed freely, while the better herbage has no chance to seed, and very soon the pasture becomes run out. lu culling flocks, the following should be rejected — viz., short-stapled and hard-wooUed sheep ; sheep that strip at the point*, have no top-knot, and lose the belly wool; those that have black, brown, or yellow spots on the legs or face ; very small sheep, aud those that are thin and feeble ; those which have thin and light wool, or which have white hair upon the face, under the arm, or inside the thigh ; those with very coarse wool upon the breech, or having long hairs upon the surface of the fleece ; those having wool less than one inch in length on the ribs or withers ; long-legged, small-bodied sheep, or those dipped in the back or misshapen in any way. Tfie fleece of a perfectly-woolled merino sheep should not open in layers, but should remain closed at a distance of three to four inches from the point touched, and 'every fibre of a good fleece should grow independently of any other, just like hairs in a broom.' Tiie neck of the merino ram should be short and thick, free from straight hairs on the under part, and without dewlap ; the horns should be spiral, and not too close to the head. The shortness aud regularity of the curve of the horn and that of the wool will be found proportionate. On the forehead should be a good top-knot coming down to the eyes, the face small, free from wool, and covered with fine down. The eye should be quiet, mild, and full. The body should be round, straight, but not too long upon the back, aud wide across the shoulders and loins. The legs should be short and well placed. Upon the shoulder the wool should be three to four inches long, and elsewhere as near to this standard as possible both in length and fineness. The fleece should be smooth and level over the entire surface, thick, sofi to the touch, with abundance of gold, aud wlieu handled should fill the hand. The chief defects of a merino fleece are (1) ' watery wool,' which renders it fit for the manufacture of inferior goods only. This defect consists iu an absence of the natural curves aud an appearance as if the wool had been crimped, a want of elasticity when the wool is squeezed, and deadness of handling, similar to that of flax : it is found below the shoulder precisely where the best wool should be. This defect is markedly perpetuated by breeding from rams thus de- fective, (2) Toppiness, which consists of a pointed appear- ance of the fleece, from the fibres being of uneven length, when the wool curls at the end and forms ' noils :' these are dead wool, and break off in carding, and cause a loss which reduces the value. (3) Broad-topped wool, or that which, while seeming to the inexperienced eye to be even and well grown, is interlaced and almost felted together, the top of the fleece clings together and breaks when separated, the wool, being split frim the top downward for half an inch, and dead and without strength, breaks with a shght strain, and causes loss and annoyance, (i) Felty and clouay wool, or what is known as ' cotty' wool, originally owing to starvation or un- favourable weather. This is also a property transmitted by descent, and sheep owning such a fault should not be bred from. This fault consists in a flossy appearance of the staple, which causes the wool to mat, and when carded or combed there is a great consequent waste. (5) Meshy wool, or that which is light, weak, unsound, and without body, and is consequent upon neglect. Lockywool,orthat which opens or breaks into separate locks, and is generally seen upon the shoulder and ribs. Kempy wool is that which is mixed with coarse wliite hairs, and appears generally upon the face, forearm, and inside the flank more conspicuously, but its ap- pearance there unfortunately is a proof that the greater part of the fleece is adulterated with it. These hairs do not take the dye, aud the consequent loss of value in the fleece is easily 390 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. perceived This amounts to 50 per cent. (6) Teuder or breachy wool, which is absolutely unfit for manufacturing. Tliis defect depends solely upon bad management, and results from poor care or scarcity of feed or water. When low condition from want of nutrition occurs, the growth of wool is contracted and the fibres become attenuated or very fine. When the cause is removed, the growth is stronger and the fibres become of their normal character. The wool is then weak in the middle of the fibre, and snaps apart upon a strain at that part which grew while the sheep were in poor condition. ' There is nothing which more effectually causes " break in wool" than the want of water.' Most of these defects being fixed constitutionally upon the animals and descending to their progeny, it is of the utmost importance to select breeding stock free from them." From these foregoing fac is we should gatlier tliat it is of the greatest importance for our shepherds to gi»e proper attention to the improvement of their3ocks from within, or at least from selections made in their own locality ; thus building up a class of sheep suitable for the peculiarities of 8')il and other conditions to which they are subject, rather than by ill-selected or promiscuous foreign importations. — New York Tribune. EMIGRATION IN 1873. The emigration of 1873, which amounted to 310,612 persons, was greater than that of any previous year since 1854, when the so-called " Irish Exodus," which began in 1847, may be deemed to have terminated. The number of emigrants embarked last year from each of the three divisions of the United Kingdom was — From England 232,885 „ Scotland 24,526 „ Ireland 53,201 The destination and nationalities of the emigrants are shown in the following short abstract : Nationalities. Destination. i "En a J 8 3 2 s U o o It 1 The United States. British N. America 78,968 19,438 18,814 6,123 12,226 5,423 2,852 809 75,536 4,184 3,471 501 61,320 7,687 1,029 2,162 72,198 5,023 476 262 4,308 233,073 37,208 26,428 13,903 Ail other Places.... Total 123,34,3 21,310 83,692 10,069 310,612 In 1872 the totals were 118,190 19,541 72,763 79,023 6,696 295,213 There was an increase, therefore, as compared with 1873, of — English 5,153 Scotch 1,769 Irish 10,929 and a decrease of foreigners of 6,825. The per-centage of emigrants of each nationality was in 1873— English 39-70 Scotch 6-84 Irish 26-94 Foreigners 2324 Not distinguished 3.24 The total emigration for the year exceeded that of 1872 by 15,399 persons. The excess was divided chiefly betwfen the colonies in British North America and those in Australasia. About 5,000 more persons than in the previous year having gone to the North American colonies, and about 10,500 more to the Australian colonies. The large increase in the emigra- tion to Australasia is no doubt attributable to the re-opeaing of aasieted emigration,— jFVom ihg Official Tvhlet, TENANT-RIGHT AND LABOUR-RIGHT. TO THE EDITOR OF THE MARK LANE EXPRESS. Sir, — It would appear from your leading article on the discussiou on Tenants' Compensations in the Notts Chamber of Agriculture that I was in fear of a permU- s/oe bill. It appears to me that a permissive bill is simply ridiculous. Some landlords join their tenants ia asking for a Tenant-Right Bill for their mutual benefit. Why do they not also ask for a bill to enable the tenants to raise their labourers a shilling or two a-week ? In my humble judgment that would benefit everybody. "We have had two sets of discussions this year — Tenants' Compensation and the Labourers' Unions. We are told by the very same class of persons that as the demand for farms is greater than the supply, the tenant-farmers, however rich and intelligent tliey may be, must be jirotected, inasmuch as they are not in a position to make just and proper agreements for their farms. On the other hand, when the supply of labourers is greater than the demand, the flag o\ political economy is hoisted at once, and the poor half-starved men are told they must exist on bread and tea, or migrate, or emigrate, in obedience to a great law, which is not to be broken. As a sincere democrat, I ask Why are a class with, it is said, 800 millions of capital to be protected, when a far larger class, who have nothing but their labour, are not to be pro- tected at all ? Yours, Christopher Nevile. Thorney, Oct. 22. THE IN FARMER'S INTEREST " RE-ADJUSTMENT." TO THE EDITOR OF THE MARK LANE EXPRESS. Sir, — In your last issue there was a report of the Devon and Cornwall Chamber of Agriculture, at which an estimate was given of £800,000,000, as the capital employed in farming in England. It may be useful to remind the agriculturist that if the movement for assessing personal property to the poor were carried out, this would have to be assessed, and tenant-farmers have to contribute on their respective stocks. As a rule, farmers have lately been less anxious to reduce the rates than some few years ago was their desire, no doubt being of opinion that Mr. Genge Andrews, in his evidence before a Select Committee of the House of Com- mons, was quite correct in stating substantially that i £90 rates were taken otf, £90 rent would be put on ; in short, that so much less rates meant so much more rent. Now what would be the annual assessment of the 800 millions of farming stock ? The special reporter of The Times, in an article headed "Farming in Suffolk," which appeared in that journal of 26th September last, giving some practical details, showed rather over 10 per cent, as the average profit of occupation of 200 acres, of which the rent was £335 for the ten years 1862 to 1871, on a capital of £2,500 ; the recent increased price of labour for the last year had been £102, thereby reducing the tenant-farmer's profit from £250 (round figures) to £150, or from 10 to 6 per cent. If this be a fair representative case, and The Times correspondent says " I have every reason to trust the good faith of the farmer in this instance," the assessment would have stood on the 800 millions at SO millions, the increased price of labour rendering an appeal of over- assessment to be reduced to 48 millions annually ; perhaps, however, it may be safe to take a medium, and fix 8 per cent, as a reasonable rate of profit, making 64 millions a« the annual value at which the estimated 800 milliQue of THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 391 farming stock should be assessed. £140,000,000 was the estimated annual value of the land, therefore farming stock -would have to contribute nearly one-half the pro- portion charged on the laud. How any other person than the landlord could derive advantage from such re- adjustment of taxation is beyond my power to under- stand. Then, on the subject of what may shortly be called succession duties, so ably noted in your leading article of 12th Oct., it seems that when a tenant-farmer pays £1 the landlord only pays 2s. 6d. ! Can any sane man justify this anomaly ? Still, not one word is spoken at agricultural dinners on the subject, notwithstanding the great interest which country gentle- men appear to take in behalf of tenant-farmers. Is a taxation of £80 on farming stock, when the landlord is taxed £10 only on the land, a reasonable inducement for the application of more capital by tenant-farmers? Where is the man who will in common justice bring this subject before the House of Commons ? Once men- tioned the present inequality could not stand the pressure of public opinion beyond the existing Parliament. Oct. 22. Your obedient servant. Common Sense. A. MILD AUTUMN.— A mild autumn is the nile rather, than the exception in this country. Britishers who have by travel become familiarised with the climate of the prairie region of the United States designate such weather as we are now enjoying the " Indian summer," because of its likeness to the pleasant autumnal weather of the States, which colours the woods as they are coloured here, but with more fire and greater variety. The gigantic gooseberry and prodigious potato that help the newspaper reader to roll easily out of political excitement into bucolic rest will now be superseded by a second crop of apple-blossom, an unwonted late produc- tion of ripe strawberries, and a second golden-green growth of the forest trees, which have been long starved by drought, and are uow considerably excited by a welcome fall of rSin and a renewal of the summer sunshine. We have had two small frosts in the neighbourhood of London — one of about three degrees on the 8t"a, and one of about five degrees on the 20th. But vegetation is as yet scarcely affected, and in our own garden, on the cold clay of the great Uottora that connects the valley of the Lpa with the east of MuswpII Hill, geraniums out of doors are now flowering freely, Berheris Banvi/ii is richly adorned with racemes of its peculiar apricot-tinted flowers kidney beans are producing plentifully, balsams are buxom green bushes showing still a few of their handsome flowers, and several plants of the dianthus and primula families are in flower. As the gardener fears a forward spring as the pre- cursor of a poor summer, so he cannot but regard tlie present enjoyable weather as dangerous to vegetation, for it promotes activity in plants that should be going to rest, and renders them the more liable to suffer should intense cold suddenly supervene. It is not much we can do to avert possible loss iu the event of winter coming early upon us, and findin? vegeta- tion soft and sappy and unprepared for frost. As regards pro- babilities, they are in favour of another mild winter, but, as we know nothing of the future, it is well to be always prepared for the worst. Now, as regards every tree and shrub that is to be bouglit and planted, or simply moved from one part of the garden to another, the prudent cultivator will take advan- tage of the dryness of the ground, and the other agreeable con- ditions that prevail for outdoor work, to make an end of all planting and transplanting as soon as possible. Every tree and shrub lifted now, even if full of green leaves and actually making new shoots, will go through a hard winter better than those of its own kind in the same climate that have not been disturbed. We have many times saved fine specimen plants ol questionable hardiness by simply lifting tliem carefully, and planting them again on the very same sites. The tender tea roses are especially benefited by this procedure. The lifting stops the growing, and operates in some degree as an artificial winter. The gardener may now with advantage look around to discover for himself the subjects that it may be advisable to subject to the process. Trees that are known to be hardy and that are doing well should of course be left alone, for these remarks apply onlj to subjects that usually suffer whea they grow too late and are frozen too soon. As for greenhouse plants of all kinds, the sunshine is good for them, and if they have plenty of air, and the smallest possible supplies of water, they will go to rest quietly. On the other hand, many things tiiat are to be forced will require to be made to feel that winter has actually come upon them, and this to some extent may be managed. Stools of rhubarb, seakale, and suchlike that are to be forced should be lifted and left out to be just touched by Irost. A thin coat of leaves should be put over them to pre- vent injurious desiccation, but they should come out of the warm ground into the cool night air to experience the rigours of a make-believe winter, before being tucked in comfortably in the forcing-house. It may not occur to the mind of the Church to pray for rain just now, but, as a matter of fact, we want a steady downpour, day and night, for a whole week at least. On our strong clay in the marshy bottom on the western side of the Seven Sisters Head, the ground is fairly moist for a depth of two inches only ; below that depth for five feet at least it is as dry as dust, and we are actually compelled to keep the water-cart going as a necessary implement in the business of plantiflg, which is unusual at this season of the year. We may reasonably expect rain in plenty shortly, and it may be some comfort now to bear in mind that we are always more sure of the winter than of the summer. — The Gardener's Blagazine. A HIGH HARVEST FESTIVAL— The festival of St. Luke was selected by the Rev. W. J. Richardson, of St. 'i'homas's, Regent-street, as the day for Harvest Thanksgiving ; and very tastefully indeed, though not profusely, was the ugly old chapel decorated with fruits and flowers. The altar was crowded with candles — I will not commit myself even to a guess at their number — and bright with flowers. The choristers' stalls were hung with bunches of grapes that must have made the little boys' mouths water ; and the font and pulpit were also gay with autumn garlands and ears of corn. Banners were stationed by the vestry door as I entered, and young men clad in cassocks, with the badges of their guilds hanging from their necks, were busily marshalling the vast congregation to their places. "Matins" were commenced in a lugubriously low pitch at eleven ; but Tallis' festival responses with accompani- ment soon raised this. Special psalms were chanted to different tunes by the soprani and adults of the choir antiphonically ; and Dr. Stainer's harmonised Gregorian Te 2)i?k;» was remark- able, as showing how much miglit be made by a little orna- mentation of that antiquated and generally rather distressing kind of music. After the sermon, which was not appropriate, came the offertory, collected while the choir sang the fine harvest hymn, " We plough the fields and scatter the good seed on the land ;" and then the ofliciating minister, standing in the " eastward position" at the altar, concluded matters with the General Thanksgiving, Prayer of St. Chrysostom, and Benediction. At 12.15 ten tapers were lighted on the altar, and the choir, which had left the chancel, entered in proces- sion, with two banners, and a handsome new cross of silver gilt, glittering with gems, the choristers carrying bouquets, and singing, " Come, ye faithful people, come ; raise the song of Harvest Home!" Then commenced the " High Celebra- tion." This, it need scarcely be said, was choral throughout ; even the Epistle and Gospel being intoned. The Kyrie, Credo, and Gloria were by Dykes; ami the beautiful hymn " Jerusa- lem, my iiappy home," was selected for the offertory. The " Comfortable Words" and "' Sursum Corda" was sung to a complicated melody by the officiating minister, very much after the manner of the reader in a synagogue service. Tlie " Sanctus" was a beautiful one ; and before the Consecration Prayer was sung a soprano solo and chorus. Verily, the Public Worship Regulation Bill will make a revolution in St. Thomas' next summer 1 The celebrant stood full in front of the altar with uplifted hands during the former portion of the prayer, and afterwards elevating the elements. The congre- gatiim prostrated themselves during the consecration ; but few communicated, for was it not a " High" celebration ? Several sacramental hymns succeeded, including Gounod's " Bene- dictus" and " Agnus Dei," and the whole closed with a reces- sional hymn. In the meantime, we poor outsiders looked dowa from the gallery, feeling how far we had been left behind by the advancing tide of Ritualism, and wondering what our ola- fashioned country cousins would have tiiought could they by any possibility have anticipated such"a High Harvest Eestival as that exceedingly beautiful one we had just wit- nessed \'-Th9 Daily News, 392 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. "DRY" EUMOUR. — The House had not merely no Berual Osborne, but it was fairly at a loss to discover any one on whom a slired of Mr. Berual Osborne's mantle might have fallen. Some exppctation was aroused by the return of Mr. Patrick Boyle Smollett lor Cambridge. Mr. Smollett had long since acquainted the world with the fact that he was not destitute of a certain power of manufacturing coarse jocosities. In a past session he had styled the late Mr. Maguire " a talking potato." The phrase was a plagiarism, but it was felicitous. Unhappily Mr.'Smollett had no sooner made his attack on Mr. Gladstone tlian honourable members perceived that his faculty of amusing them had gone, and that only the dregs of scurrility were left behind. At this dispiriting conjuncture of affairs Sir Wilfrid Lawson asserted his presence in the House as the good genius of the hour. Anything more dreary than the debates on the Licensing Bill was never heard in St. Stephen's itself. But Sir "Wilfrid Lawson extracted merriment from the theme, cracked his jokes, and kept liis audience, in a tremor of suppressed laughter. He did not gush seutentioiisly like Mr. Beresford Hope, nor essay a humour so broad as that attempted by tlie colossal ]\Ir. O'Gorman. He adapted his tone to his listeners, and it must be confessed that, high or low in itself, it was singularly level with the intelHi^ence and appreciation of a larfie majority of the House of Commons. It was a positive relief after the interchausce of trite contro- versial trivialities between the gentlemen on the right and left hand of the Speaker, after the prosers bad done with their ptaiitudes, and the bores had rested from their questions ; after Mr. Gobclicu in a fit of simulated indignation had twitted the Government first with canting, then with recanting, and next with recanting their recantation ; alter Mr. Cross had feebly vindicated, in that peculiarly thin and mean voice with which the Home Secretary is blessed, what by a conventional euphe- mism he was pleased to call the " principle" of the bill — it was a positive relief when Sir Wilfrid Lawson rose. There is no surer test of the repute in which a speaker is held than the appearance presented by the House on his starting to his legs. If the benches are thin and grow thinner, or if from being densely packed they swittly show a series of vacancies, you may be sure that the tongue of a bore of the first magnitude is about to wag. What happened when Sir Wilfrid Lawson emerged from his place just behind Mr. Walter was the con- verse of this. The attendance in the House was certain to be thin ; it is computed that no honourable gentleman, save the occupants of the Ministerial bench, ever endured more ihan half an hour of the Licensing Bill continually ; but the intelligence that the member for Carlisle was riding his favourite hobby was sufficient to rekindle the expiring ashes of interest, and to replenish a whole row of empty places. The bores and prosers hate Sir Wilfrid. His flippancy, they solemnly inform you, covers his cause with ridicule, niraself with contempt, and is a direct insult to the House. It must be admitted that Sir Wilfrid Lawson is flippant. Cold water, as he himself admits, is not a cheery theme ; but it is his mis- sion to show that with a due measure of facetious treatment it may become as amusing as any other which engages the atten- tion of the Imperial Farliament. If Sir Wiltrid had assumed the heavily tragic role of Mr. J. B. Gough, and had composed rhapsodies on mountain streamlets and flashing rivers, the House would have declined to hear him. But he has no am- bition to be the Demosthenes of teetotalism ; he is quite con- tent to discharge the more humble, more entertaining, and not less useful functions of i's Hierocles. The topic which en- gaged Sir Willrid Lawsou's energies last session in the House was somewhat musty. Quite enough of "Beer and Bible" had been heard iu the course of the last general election, and in the comments of politicians and journalists which had suc- ceeded it. Sir Wilfrid Lawson really contrived to impart freshness to the matter. His criticism was superficial, but it was often apposite. He has the faculty, exceedingly rare in the present Parliament, of gauging precisely the temper of the House at any given moment; and the consequence was, that his remarks seldom failed to hit between the wind and water. And in a degree inferior to Mr. Disraeli, Sir Wilfrid Lawson is not destitute oi something of Mr. Disraeli's power of in- venting phrases that stick. They have not the subtle aroma which makes the word-combinations of tlie Premier such in- tellectual treats. But they serve their turn ; and when he said the other day at Manchester that " populous places" under the new Licensing Act were dependent, not on the density of the population, but the density of the magistrates, he achieved a very respectable epigram. But it is when Sir Wilfrid Law- son has his own particular project in hand — the prohibitory Permissive Bill— th.at he is seen and heard at his best. To defend a paradox was an ancient academic exercise for stimu- lating the intellectual powers ; and Sir Wilfrid Lawson gathers the very inspiration of well-bred buffoonery when retailing his humorous arguments in favour of the proposition, that because some persons drink to excess, theiefore it is right to allow no one to drink at all. — The World. A LANDLORD'S LECTURE. At a show on the Ormsby Gore estate, Ireland, Major Ormsbi Gore said : There are several matters connected with this show which have come to my ears that I cannot pass over without expressing a candid and clear opinion upon. In the first place, I have to congratulate you all on the bountiful returns of the harvest, and upon the general pro- sperity which appears in the country. With the exception of the price of store cattle, in every department of farming there are good prices, and returns are bountiful. The condition of the cattle in the show-field to-day was not so good as on former occasions. I do not attribute this to any fault of the farmers for not having them in better condition. It was mainly owing to the seaso)!. Then, with regard to the number of entries, I have gone through the list with Mr. Layng, the secretary, and I fiud that in the first class this year there were seventy- eight specimens exhibited, compared with sixty-eight of last year. In the second class there were fifty-four, compared with forty. five of last year. These are gratifying features of this year's show so far ; but in the third class, which is a very im- portant class, there is this year a great falling off. There were forty-six specimens exhibited in this class last year, but to-day there were only twenty- five. The total number of entries have been 203, compared with 188 of last year, show- ing, on the whole, an increase of 15. That is a satisfac- factory, though not a large difference. I must also say that in the horse department there was a marked improvement on former years. In pigs and sheep there was a falling off. I novy come to a more unpleasant subject, and that is that I have heard of more than one instance where the third rule of the Society has not been adhered lo, but on the contrary, where it has hi en disgracefully infringed upon. The third rule is a very simple one, and easily understood. It runs as follows: " Every specimen exhibited must be the property of the exhi- bitor for at least three month previous to the exhibition," On a former occasion I had reason to remark upon an infringes ment of this rule, audi then told you all tiiat if sucli things went on I would break up the Society; for it is a scandalous thing that any tenant should be so degraded to as swindle his neighbour — for I can call it nothing else but swindlug — out of what should fairly come to that neighbour — what he earned by exhibiting an animal which was not his own. There is also another unpleasant matter I must refer to, and that is that the very small subscriptions which you are asked to pay are in many cases grudgingly given, and sometimes not paid at all. That is not a fair thing to do to the Society. My own subscription to the Society is seven or ten times more than the subscriptions of the tenants put all together. If you do not pay in the few shillings you are asked to give, how can it be expected that I cau consider you take any interest in the Society at all? It is not a creditable thing that you sliould, neglect these matters. Indeed, seeing such a state of things and finding that the supporters are nearly all confined to the parish of Achonry, I have been recommended to break up the Society (several voices: " Do not, your honour"). Well, I will not do so at present. I will give you one more chance ; but assuredly, if I have grounds for making the same complaints, I will break up the Society, and I will consider in what other way a similar expenditure on my part would be best laid out for the advantage of my tenants. It is only for their advan- tage that I do subscribe to the Society as it exists ; and if the tenants are so dead to their own interests as not to think it worth their while to support it, I must only find out some other means whereby loan benefit tlieiu. It is not lor the sake of putting money in my own pocket I have ke[)t up the Society so long : it is lo benefit you ; and so long as you give it a fair and proper support, I will support it too. You can- not expect me to do so when you infringe a plain rule which can be easily observed. I^o doubt the Society iu past times THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 393 did mucli good ; but I am begiuniug to think tliat those days are past, and that the benefits are not extending so rapidly as in former years. There is one thing apparent — that, since the formation of the Society, there has been a marked improve- ment in the making of butter. When we first established this Society, 27 years ago, the butter of this locality was very infe- rior ; now it is very good. The consec|uence is, the tenants have derived a considerable amount of profit by the improve- ment. Major Gore then referred to the benefits which would accrue to the farmers of tlie county if they could put their hay into wooden hay barns, such as he saw in the Abbey visw farm-yard, and he recommended some improvement in tlie formation of Buch. TENANT At the quarterly meeting of the Notts. Chamber of Agri- culture, held at E-etford, Mr. Toljambe, M.P., in the chair, Mr. GoDBER read the following paper : I believe it was proposed by the Council in the first instance that the discussion to-day should be based upon tiie report of a committee appointed by the Central Chamber to consider this question in all its bearings, copies of which it was then expected would be forthcoming sufficiently early to aid us in our discussion to-day. At a subsequent meeting of the Council it was ascertained that the report would not be available in time. I was then requested to open the dis- cussion here in what the Council please to call my own way. I much regret the circumstance that the schedules containing the customs collected over the whole conntry bearing on this subject with the report I have referred to have not been forthcoming, there being no doubt of their greatly facilitating our discussion on the subject. You are all aware that the subject for discussion is by no means a new one ; it has been discussed by this Chamber at AVorksop, where it was intro- duced by Jlr. Huskinsou, it has also been discussed at a meeting of the Chamber held at Newark, 18 months ago, when an important paper was read by Jlr. Nevile, and I believe all the provincial chambers have given to it a like prominency ; it has also been a standing dish with the Central Chamber, and further it has on one occasion put in an ap- pearance in the House of Commons, from whence it disap- peared through the forced absence of one of its sponsors and the timidity of the other. We therefore take it for granted that whenever and wherever it is now publicly discussed, it is with a view to legislation. The first question naturally arising, is what change has come over the agricultural world or the community at large, to render legislation on this subject desirable (or a proper solution of this question, it is not necessary to go back to a very remote period in the history of our country. We have no need to go beyond the limits of the present century to find agriculture in a rude and undeveloped state. The same would also apply to our mining, manufacturing, shipping, commercial, and other in- terests— interests which have in our day attained to such gigantic dimensions. At the period referred to the habits of the people were plain and simple, aud their wants were few. Rents were but a trifle, implements of husbandry were rude and uncostly. Chemical and engineering science were but in their bud. The wants aud requirements of particular plants were little understood; nitrates, phosphates, muriates, ammonias, &c.. &c., were things unheard of ; yea, a great portion of the land in this country, our feus, forest,, aud heath lands, were thought to be of little worth, but the commercial spirit, the growth of the last fifty years, with the great increase in our population, has changed the whole aspect of affairs. Land is now dealt in on commercial principles, and is annually becoming of more value aud importance. Not only have we a population trebled in numbers, but their habits, tastes, and means have undergone an inconceivable change. Under such circum- stances a more per.''ect development of the capabilities of the soil is a question not merely affecting the parties directly concerned, but one indirectly affecting the whole community. Men of noble birih and high position, and men, too, of low estate, have proclaimed to the world that the land does not produce half what it is capable of producing ; but all men of a practical character, men who have had no little experience of the vicissitudes of seasons, will look upou these assertions as bordering upon the extravagant. You may treat your land most liberally, and raise it to the highest degree of fertility, but you have neither the keys of tlie clouds nor the com- mand of the sun, and xhea looking for the return you feel entitled to expect your crops may be either stunted by drought or ruined by excess of moisture. No RIGHT. doubt a great deal of land is capable of producing much more under more liberal treatment, but the first thing necessary to accomplish this is the application of capital. The amount already employed in conducting the operations of agri- culture is not millions merely, but hundreds of millions, and it is notorious that in no other occupation or pursuit in this conn- try is there so much capital employed where the profits are so small and the security so inadequate and undefined. In this respect, with all our vaunted progress, we have not got beyond a few crude,' irregular, and, some of them, ridiculous customs, varying in almost every county. Hitherto, the best guarantee the teuant has had for the investment of his capital in agri- culture has been the good name and high character of the landlord. But it not unfrequently happens that another Pha- raoh comes upon the scene, who has no knowledge of Joseph. Estates are brought into the market, and pass into the hands of speculators, manufacturers, or wealthy merchants, who bow to nothing but the golden image, and listen to no doctrine but the one of pounds, shillings, and pence. Reviewing the cir- cumstances interwoven with the whole question, it must be conceded that the demand for a uniform, definite, arid more substantial guarantee for the investment of capital in improv- ing the land, increasing its fertility, and augmenting the sup- ply of food, is a just and reasonable one, and one that must commend itself to the consideration of the Legislature. The details of this subject will form matter for much discussion, and will lead to the expression of a variety of opinions. What is wanted is simply that the line should be drawn fairly between the parties concerned. I think the opinion is pretty general that all really permanent improvements properly be- long to the landlord. Under this head we may name the thorough drainage of clay land, the making of all permanent roads necessary for conducting the operations of the farm, the planting and fencing of quicks for making proper enclo- sures, the erection of suitable farm buildings and cottages, providing for a proper and permanent water supply, reclaim- ing waste lands, &c. Many different methods have been pursued with respect to draining. On many of our largest estates the whole has been carried out by the landlord under proper supervision, interest being charged for the cost of labour only. This is no doubtithe]most commendable system; others have had recourse to the loan system, the repayment of which is extended over some 20 years, at the rate of six or seven per cent. This charge is commonly placed upon the tenant, making an addition to his rent. In such case the improvement is really effected by the tenant. Tliere are, too, many instances in which tlie landlord has found the material, the teuant find- ing labour. Much of the work done upon this principle has not been well and efticiently done. There are also many instances where the whole cost has been borne by the tenant. In these cases an allowance is made on quitting, extending over a limited period, generally from three to seven years, a period much too short. But there are many lands that yet require draining, the landlord being unwilling or unable, and the tenant not liking to embark in the undertaking, the conditions as to compensation not being satisfactory and encouraging. I can only compare this drainage business to the education qnestion at the time the Legis ature took it up. A great deal has been done during the past 50 years by a variety of parties upon many different principles. Much has been done imperfectly, and requires to be done over again. I have dwelt at some length u])on this question of drainage because it is really the first and most im- portant step in improving our clay lands, and specially so when viewed in connection with the revolution that has taken place in the mode of cultivation. The old high-oacked ridges and deep furrows will not do for the steam cultivator, reaping machine, and modern horse hoe. Iliere arc no doubt many 394 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. improvements of importance peculiar to certain localities, witli which we are not familiar, which may be placed in the same category, being of a permanent character, and therefore pro- perly belonging to the owner. We will now pKss ou to notice very briefly such improvements as come within the province of the tenant they, although of an exhaustible character, neces- sitate a large outlay. To raise a naturally poor or an esliausted soil to a good and fair state of fertility is not the work of twelve months but a work of years. Mr. Mechiis, I believe, a good authority on such a question ; to do this under a system of short tenure, or in the absence of proper guarantees for compensation on quitting, ought not to be expected. Cleansing, claying, chalking, liming, manuring, boning, &c., added to which a large outlay on food is necessary, especially ou all hght lands, as cake, corn, &c. The increasing demand for meat brought about by the increased means and altered habits of the people, lias rendered it desirable that much more should be done in this direction. While upon this point I should like to call your attention to what has long appeared to me a great anomaly in the existing customs. \Ve are foolish enough to give a premium in favour of using foreign produce, a liberal allowance being given wliere cakes are used, the poorer sorts of which often contain a large proportion of olTal from onr own grain. All this sort of thing is allowed for ; but wiien our own pure grain is used, as beans, oats, or wheat (which at its present price is cheaper than anything), no allowance is made. Surely this requires to be remedied. It is said that in Lincolnshire and Notts, we have the best cus- toms in the country, but they difl'er widely. In Nottf. where the turnip crop is consumed on tlie land, the rent and rates arc allowed, but in Lincolnshire no such aliowauce is made, and I am informed that in parts of the neighbouring county of York half orders are allowed, even after the succeeding barley crop is taken; such is the great want of uniformity that no two counties are alike. We now come to the most delicate and intricate part of tlie subject; what form do we desire to see legislation take upon this question ? Sliall it be permis- sive, or of general application. We will not have the word comptilsion, it always seems to carry with it so much alarm to the mind of an Englishman. To have a measure merely per- missive would, to my mind, be making confusion worse" con- founded. I would prefer it should be of general application, making an exception only in favour of leases from seven yesrs and upwards. Upon this part of the subject we have some little data upon which to go. Haviug watched the discussions of the Central Chamber, I think "they propose to make it permissive, rejecting the twelth clause in the late Bill ; it would then be open for any one to say I will have nothing to do with that abominable Compensation Act, I will make my own conditions, and from that court you know there could be appeal. No law is wanted to compel liberal and enterprising landlords to eflfect improvements, or to get tliem to allow their tenants to do so. What is wanted is something tliat will reach the do-nothing class. I can scarcely believe it to be true that the Central Chamber has passed a resolution recommending tliat no permanent improvement, such as draining, erecting farm premises, or cottages, shall be effected without the owner's consent in writing. If done without this all claims to compensation to be forfeited. It has long been one of the most ridiculous feature of our crude old customs to give a premium for collecting togetlier a pile of combustible materials in the shape of farm buildings. A wooden house, barn, and stable, and two or three post sheds, and your claim to com- pensation is admitted. But if you have built a substantial cot- tage, or other building of brick and slate, all you get from valuers is a significent shake of the head, followed by the word " No claim— great hardship." They tell us to admit tiiis would be an interference with the rights of property. AV'ell, the rights of property are a difficult thing to understand. When you discharge your labourer you certainly allow liim to carry off his tools. Is not the tenant-farmer equally entitled to carry off what he has brought at his own cost for his own use and convenience, or what would bo still better, why not give compensation to the extent such improvements havecon- tributed to increase the letting vulue of the estate ? There is just one other point. 1 beheve the Central Chamber propose to give power to dilapidate where the general condition of the farm is not satisfactoiy. This would be a serious power to place in the hands of valuers, and would lead to never-ending disputes and litigation. A succession of wet seasons, despite all efforts, will nentraliae to a great extent the labour of both man and horse, and this power might be used in a ruiuou^ manner, and would contribute in no small degree to throw much inferior clay land out of cultivation. Many estates are thoroughly neglected, the owner being non-practical, and, to mend matters, injudicious in the selection of his agent, and so the estates suffer for want of practical supervision, and would it be wise for the State to give to such a guarantee for the good management of their lands ? The rent-roll of this country is a standing proof thst the balance of condition as regards the land, if taken every ten years, is greatly in the landlord's favour. Tlien let us have no penal statutes hanging over the heads of struggling tenants. Mr. Arch charges our Chambers of Agriculture with having done nothing. They will, no doubt, think he has done a little too much. Certainly we do not pretend to siiake England ; it has taken us a long time to expose and impress upon the Legislature the injustice of our old friend local taxation. We have now passed him up to higher quarters, wliere, no doubt, he will give some tough work. In my opinion the Government that deals with that question, and brings it to u just and satisfactory settlement, and also gives to the country a Tenant-ilight Bill, based upon sound prin- ciples, will be entiled to as large an amount of popularity as the Government tliat di-established the Irish Church and passed the Ballot Act. Mr. J. Walker (IMattersea), thought some care ought to be taken not to inflict expenses on landlords which they ought not to incur. There were small owners and large owners, and small holdings and large ones, and recollecting the large num- ber of farms in England under 50 acres, and that small ten- ants might erect buildings that would suit no one else, he thouglit it would be a hard case for the landlord to pay for buildings erected by tenants to gratify their own caprice. Speaking as a landlord and tenant as well, he thought it was desirable the consent of the landlord should be obtained be- fore any buildings were erected. At the same time the tenant was entitled to compensation for whatever gave additional letting value to the estate. The Chairman said he would briefly state what he con- sidered was the feeling of English landlords on this question. As Mr. Godber had told them, this subject was introduced into the House of Commons, but no conclusive result was arrived at. There was suflicient discussion, however, to show that the question was considered to be one of great import- ance. He did not think English landlords would wish to reap where they had not sown, or to take advantage of the outlay of their tsnants without compensating them for it, wherever that outlay had been beneficial to the estate. He heartily agreed with Mr. Walker when he said that it would be an objectionable thing to allow compensation where building had been done without the consent of the landlord. Mr. Walker mentioned instances where it would be prejudicial to the landlord's interests, and it certainly might interfere with any improvements whicii the landlords might consider it ne essary to make. The building of cottages was a very great want and requirement in places where the labourers had to live in the town, but from his ov/n experience he found that where cottages had been provided in some cases the ladies ' — it was always the ladies who were to blame — did not like to live so far away from the towu. The men were willing to come, but the cottages were empty because the women would not live so far away. Therefore a tenant might build cottages about his farm, and, having a difficulty in filling them, ex- pect his landlord to pay for cottages which were of no use. He thought that in any legislation the landlord would be en- titled to some guarantee that he should not be called upon to pay fur any unnecessary outlay. He felt convinced that com- l)iMi^;ition for any increase in the letting value would meet with no opposition from any one. [Mr. Gouber : That is all we want]. He must say he dislikea Permissive Bills, and lie thought any measure should apply to all parties alike — be equally binding on all. If the tenant had made no outlay in wluit v/as a permanent improvement he would not be entitled to compensation, but if the tenant had laid out his money in wiiat were material and permanent improvements of the estate he was entitled to receive compensation, so far as it in- creased the letting value, at his landlord's hands. To take any other course would be unfair, and he thought all men of sense and honour would agree upon that. .Mr. JijiiN Hemsley said however much pleased he had been by the very able paper of Mr. Godber, he had been still more gratified with the remarks that had fallen from the THE FARMBR'B MAGAZINE. 395 Chairmau, because it was the want of a combination of opinion ] in an argumentative sense, that prevented them from agreeing on some basis for a legislative enactment, which might be considered of a permanent character. If landlords and tenants could meet as they do now, and express their views freely, easting forth that which was rotten and unsound to the winds, and retaining tliat which was weighty and sound and sending it forth to the world, they then would arrive at something like a proper basis whereby legislative enactments might be establish- ed. Mr. Godber had said that the discussions on this subject must be considered as for the purposes of legislation, and he (the speaker) thought that point must be conceded. Therefore the question could not be too fully discussed, and he was suprised that the landlords seemed rather to stand aloof from meeting tliis question as he imagined was the case with some. He was sure there was the utmost anxiety to obtain the assistance of the landlords in arranging some bill which would be likely to be of service to them, and he thought it was important that this should be done by the landlords and tenants them- selves, instead of by parties outside, though if something was not done by those connected with the land it would certainly be taken out of their hands by parties outside. He considered that the question of drainage was in a very unsatisfactory state, and that it ought to extend over a much longer period. Mr. Godber started the point that legislation should be compul- sory, except in the case of a seven years' lease. He consi- dered this gave rather an important turn to tlie subject, and one whicli would meet the views of some landlords who seemed a little nervous on this compulsory question. He was, however, inclined to think that under tlie present Egyptian cloud that overhangs the British farmer, a lease of seven years would not be received with general favour. Where pressed it might give a certain amount of freedom to owners, without pro- ducing the desired result. AVhatever measure was submitted, he thought sliould have the freest discussion throughout the country. Tlie last bill, introduced by the Marquis of Hunt- ley, , was one of a crude character, and passed over the inte- rests of owners in a captious manner, so that the field seemed now to be open for a measure which might be agreed upon by both landlord and tenant, and to attain that end it must be freely discussed. Mr. Nevile said when he read a paper on this subject before the Newark meeting, he opposed the 12th clause in the late bill, because it interfered with freedom of contract. There was not a single landlord who made any communication to liim, nor one who told him lie was opposed to the bill, but the op- position to it came from a number of gentlemen wit!i whom he had lived on terms of friendship for many years — the tenant- farmers of Lincolnshire and JNottinghamshire. They consi- dered it would lake away from them the power of making any contract, and he, for his part, maintained that the tenant-larracr ought not to have his hands tied by any act of Parliament. Prom that point he really could uot recede. The tact was, tlie resolution directed against the 13th clause was carried by 70 farmers without the least hesitation, and he would add that the strongest opposition to it came from the farmers of Notts., Lincolnshire, and the East Hiding. Mr. Read, who, apart from all chaff as to his being " muzzled" by office, was a person who ought to know, had said there were not twenty men in the House of Commons who would pass the 13th clause, and it was really the tenant-farmers who made the opposition so strong, The farmers now had more power than the landlords ; the present rarlianient, as far as the county constituencies went, was elected under the ballot. At the same time he would admit that there was room for a most useful bill to be passed. He considered that any bill whicli dictated any particular Tenant-Right would be most injurious, especially if it called in arbitration. Having remarked that the Marquis of Huntley, in his late bill, made out a strong case for compensation, he said that for his part he should always be disposed to dealfairly with his tenants, if, for no other reason, that if his 4,000 acres were thrown on his hands he should have to spend £45,000 in farming the land. His tenants were quite secure against him robbing them. He thought the best course would be for the landlords and tenants to freely discuss the matter, and he would add that if any of his tenants brought liim an agreement which he could sign without doing himself harm he would sign it with pleasure. Mr. Gilbert said he had always thought that a bill estab- lishing the payment of compensation for permanent improve- ments would be equally advantageous to the landlord as to the tenant. He mentioned an instance in which the absence, of a law had worked unjustly, and said a short bill would facilitate matters, but as to Tenant-Right, omas to customs being so various he thought a permissive measure would best meet the case. The CiiAiiiJiAN then moved a vote of thanks to Mr. Godber for his very able paper, which was seconded by Mr. Walker, and carried unanimously. Mr. GoDBEK, in reply, said he was rather surprised to find his views pretty nearly in accordance with those of every other gentleman who had spoken. In reply to Mr. Walker, he would not have the landlord charged with anything but what had improved the value of his estate, because it was just pos- sible some tenants might have peculiar crotchets. Some might fancy dogs and build large kennels, whilst others might fancy poultry, and therefore nothing ought to be considered but what improved the letting value of the estate. Then, again, they could not legislate for any particular cases, and certainly con- cessions must be made to both parties. He was pleased by the line of argument taken by the chairman, and if all the landowners were like him or the Duke of Rutland, they would have no need to talk about improvements. He had his own views about the Central Chamber. The Central Chambe / consisted of a number of landlords who took the greatest in- terest in improving their estates, together with the cream of the tenantry, men who lived under noblemen who did every- thing they asked for. Such a body, however, was not a fair representation of the agriculture of this country. They no more represented the struggling: life of agriculture than the West-end did the struggling life of London. As to the 12th clause in the late bill, the feeling seemed to be calming down , and by discussion, and each party giving way a Jlittle, he had no doubt some proper arrangement would ultimately be arrived at. At a meeting of the Devon and Cornwall Chamber of Agri- culture at Modbury, Mr. Wm. Snell introduced the subject of " Legislation with regard to Compensation for Unexhausted Improvements." He said : If agriculture li:ia remained stationary, there would have been no object for their meeting that day. He had heard his father say that he was the first man who found it necessary to hoe turnips in the field. As to compensation for improvements formerly, improvements were then never effected. TMiere was, therefore, no uecessily then for what they were talking about that day. The necessity for legislation had now become urgent, because more capital was required and the population had increased. They should remember that any well-digested scheme, receiving the approval of that|meeting and of the Central Chamber, and the other cham- bers throughout the country, might possibly intluence future leg- islation. He wished to show them the magnitude of the capital employed in the business in which they, as farmers, were en- gaged. Under Schedule B the tenant-farmers of England were assessed to the income-tax at about £60,000,000 a-year ; and when speaking of rent they should turn the £00,000,000 into £12U,000,G00, because they were assessed at one-half their rcutul. T1k-ii £20,000,000 was to be added for small holdings — one-seventh of the land of England — and this made the rental value of the agricultural land of England £140,000,000. If they took the fair number of years' rental that was required to farm an estate, they would see the amount of capital used ic their business. Farming an estate in a proper manner could not be done with less than six years' rental. If the rent were £140,000,000, and they required six years' rental, the capital meant £800,000,000, which was more than the national debt, and more than all the other capital throughout the length and breadth of the laud. The farmers outweighed all others so far as capital was concerned. Let them look, too, at the im- portance of the work in wtiich they were engaged — providing food for the people. Then as to the present position of the occupiers of the soil. There was one class not so numerous as it should be — the tenant farmers — some protected by lease — and he called this the perfection of the holding of land — and receiving compensation for unexhausted improvements at tlip end of their term. Nothing could be belter than this, but this protected class was only a small body. Then there was another class who had their estate for a teriu of years ; but with no clause for compensation at the end of those years, and there came the evil which they wanted to provide against. They wanted the land not only for their own sakes, cut for the sake of the community, and not to be "sharping out avery seven o> 14 c c 2 396 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. years, but alwaysin good condition. Then there were tenants-at- will ; and more than half the land of England was thus let. What position was this, for a man to farm with spirit ? When there was a clause for compensation, tliere was no excuse for not farming ; well but when there was no clause for compensation, a man farmed well for only a certain number of years, and then swept all he could into his pocket. So far as the tenancy -at- will was concerned, there was no inducement for a man to farm well, because if he put his property into the soil lie put himself into the power of another man and mucli as he (the speaker) respected the landlords of England, lie should not like to trust to any man. He wanted a law to protect his capital, as well as that of the landlord, who had a law to pro- tect his. He knew a tenant who was turned out of his hold- ing at the end of the first half of his term. He was as good a practical farmer as he had ever been acquainted with, and he farmed the estate well, for he had put a lot of capital in his soil Bnd was looking forward to the hist seven years o! his lease to re- coup himself. He set up a claim for compensation, but of course, gut not a farthing. A serious loss accrued to him ; and every tenant under the same landlord said, " Who knows liow soon my turn will come ?" Consequently they refrained from putting property into the land, and the land suffered thereby. In Cornwall there was a man of title, who died, and left his property to a scapegrace son. It soon got into the hands of the Jews, and on quarter-day all the tenants that could be made to go had notice to quit; and they had to quit, leaving a lot of capital in the ground, but they received not a farthing com- pensation. The Jew s did not, like Shy lock, have the pound of flesh because it was in the bond ; but tiiey turned the tenant? out because there was nothing iu the bond to prevent them. As British farmers they asked for security for their capital in a shape that no reasonable or lionest man could object to. They said that when a farmer entered into an estate and effected certain improvements, and was there for a certain number of years, he should liuve no claim on the landlords, because lie liad been on the estate long enough to recoup himself, but if he liad not been there long enough to do so the landlord must pay the little bill. A farmer could effect an improvement at half the cost that the landlord could, and if the arrangement sug- gested were carried out, it would be a great benefit to the tenant and to the people. The knotty point between the landlords and tenants was just this. The landlords said Parlia- ment must pass a just law with reference to compensation, but it must be left with the landlords to say whether they would come under the operation of the law or not. That would be a permissive bill, and would not be worth the paper it was printed on, but would be a snare, a mockery, and a delusion. The principal argument used by farmers against an alteration of the law was tiiat they had the farm much cheaper because they were to have no compensation, and, therefore, it would be better to leave well alone. If he went into a farm as a mere slug, he would farm on those conditions, and would never im- prove, and never invest any capital, so that he could not have it taken away. But lie would much rather pay a full rental for the estate, have his capital secure, and be free. They did not want to be servile to the landlord, humble to the steward and congenial to the keeper, for fear of being turned out. They should liold up their heads as men, and live in an independent manner. It was said tliat landlord and tenant met as man and man, and could make such terms as they pleased. That was incorrect. I'arins were decreasing, but larmers were multiply- iug, and if Ihey wanted to take a farm, they had to take it on such terms as the landlord drew up. He hoped Mr. Disraeli would bring in a good bill, and be unfettered by party considerations, for tlie country would support hiin if he did well, and lie had an opportunity of immortalising himself. .Mr. Snell, concluded by proposing — "That the present position ot agriculture, and the general welfare of the country, require early legislation respecting the tenure and occupation of land. That legislation for the purpose of protecting the landlords' property and the tenants' cajiital should be compul- sory, excepting in cases where they are mutually and fully protected by lease or agreement." Mr. Andrews remarked that where there was no trust there could be no mistrust. He had a little land and good tenants, but he did not want to trust them, nor did they want to trust him. When Mr. Snell spoke of the £800,000,000, it should be remembered tliat there was a good deal of moving stock in that ; but still, there could be no doubt that there were a few millions in the hands of the wrong men. He seconded the resolution that had been proposed. An Act of Parliament should be binding under every circumstance and condition in matters affecting agree- ments between landlords and tenants. The resolution was unanimously carried. THE BALA SHEEP-DOG TRIALS.— At Garth Goch, on Wednesday, Oct. I4th. — Judges : Messrs. John WilUaras, Griffith Jones, and R. V. Jones. Rhiwaedog States, for dog or bitch puppies of 1873 ; entrance, 10s. ; first prize £5, second £2 10s., third £1 58., fourth 15s. John Williams, Bryneinin, Darowen, Machynlleth, bk t Black, 2 years 1 J. Robson, Hafod, ]\Iinera, bk w Fan 1 yr. 5 mos 2 Four others were tried. The winner greatly distinguished herself, while Mr. Robson's Pan lost one of her three sheep, but Jolded tlie other two pretty cleverly, showing a little impetuosity, which seemed to hav3 caused the loss of the sheep. She was the winner of the stake at the recent trials held at Llangollen. Penllyjst Stakes, for all -aged dogs or hitches ; entrance, 10s. ; first prize £5, second £2 10s., third £1 5s., fourth 15s. Robert Roberts, Blaenycoed, bk t b iJawa^y, aged ...(div.) f Edward Pugh, Tanybwlch, Dmasmawddy, be d Scoft 4 yrs (div.) f Thomas Dobie, Graiguchaf, Llanbedr, bk w Drenny, 7 yrs 3 Robert Morris, Tymawr, Llangynog, bk w /arf, 5 yrs 4 Fifteen others were tried. In the last trial Handy No. 1 — and Al, as it turned out — was first selected. Down the hill came Handy at a fearful pace, wasting not a jot of time in " coming to terms" with his three sheep ; but these, being just released from a fold which contained some dozen future victims, declined for some minutes to part company with their com- rades in misfortune ; but our shceji-dog finding them obdurate, and too wise to use force of any sort, vocal or physical, con- tented himself by driving the sheep a step or two at a time, and then lying down, giving, we presume, by this means time for the inferior animals, as we must fain designate them, to consider that the open country and the chance of " a run for it" were better than the continued effort to rejoin a set of not over-hospitable companions. These tactics succeeded ; for Handy, after feeling his sheep up as far as the turnips, of which half the field of operations was composed, was enabled to put '• the steam on," and deliver them, in the very sense that his name applies, to bis master, Mr. Roberts, after eight minutes had only elapsed ; the sheep, one old ewe and two wethers, being anything but an accommodating trio. BARREN HONOUR.— It would not be difficult to gather from the pages of our bucolic contemporaries. The Mark Lane Express or The Farmer, that breeding and feeding stock for the edification of the urban population are far from being profitable operations. Whether the complaint has its rise in the indiscriminate grumbling of our broad- wheeled neighbours is liardly worth considering ; certain it is that the exhibiting of stock — and especially of fat stock — is not unfrequently designated more a fancy than a paying concern. If such is the sad state of matters in England with feeders, the case appears to be very much worse with the enterprising exhibi- tors who send their animals abroad. A successful fanner does occasionally manage to secure a jirize of £30 or £40 with a beast that pleases a judge's eye at a " Royal" or a local show, > and to that extent is of course recouped for his outlay in bringing a symmetrical animal into the stalls to be stared at and poked with umbrellas by a crowd of town-folk who know as much about the " points" of a prime ox or an Ayrshire cow as they do about Chinese metaphysics. But they com- pensate exhibitors differently on the Contiucut, according to the story related by Mr. John K. I'owler in The Times of yesterday. The fortunate breeder, of Prebrndal Parm, Ayles- bury, informs the readers of the leading journal that the merits of the exhibits which he forwarded to the agricultural depart- ment of the Vienna Exhibition were so far recognised by the judges that they were awarded bronze medals. The prizes, Mr. Fowler tells us, were awarded ; but, notwithstanding " the repeated apphcations of myself and others to the proper authorities, we can neither get our medals nor any answer to onr requests." An authority has told us that " he that drives fat oxen should himself be fat ;" but the Austrians are evidently desirous of showing us that he who exhibits fat oxen is bound to be fooled. — The Sportsman. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 397 THE FARMERS' AND THE LABOURERS' INTERESTS. Mr. C. S. Read, M.P., at the Blofield and Walsham Agri- cultural Association, after preseatiug prizes to labourers who had bt^ea successful ia competition in various departments of husbandry, said : Two years ago at Blofield I tried to persuade those present from joining the Labourers' Union, for seeing before me tiien, as I see now, tiie picked men of the district, men who had proved themselves skilled, industrious, and careful labourers, I contended that by joining the Union you would place yourselves on a level with the unskilled, the idle, and the careless, and further assured the old men tliat the bait held out to them by the Union of having a pension in their old age was an impossibility. No doubt you thought that ray advice was founded on a farmer's desire to keep down wages, but I would remind you that four or five years ago, before we heard of Unionism in Norfolk, I suggested a payment of 13s. a week, even in the short days of winter. 1 fancy my Blofield advice, like most other advice whicli cost nothing, wus unheeded, and some of you became members of the Union, and thus compelled the farmers to form a defence association. When Unionism was first started in my parish 1 called my men together and said, " I pay away in labour more per acre than any other tenant-farmer in this district ; it you don't join a Union, which avowedly intends to force me to give you more wages, I will not join any association of employers ;" but they did, and as a result I am a member of the Farmers' Defence Association. It was simply self-defence. I have sacrificed my independence for safety, but I tliink I have this pull over your Union — that whereas my orders will come from a centre of Norfolk farmers, yours are issued from Warwickshire or Lin- colnshire, by men who can know but little of the real state of things in Norfolk. Unions may temporarily raise wages by strikes in busy seasons, but no permanent advance can be se- cured unless you reduce the supply of labour or increase the em- ployer's profits. No combination of employers can keep down wages fl hen hands are scarce, trade is brisk, and profits are large : no combination of labourers can keep up wages when hands are plentiful, trade dull, and profits small — certainly not when losses are great. Unionists argue that labour has not received a fair proportion of the profits, and that capital has received the lion's share. That may be the case in some i industries ; but is it so injfarming ? When the coal and iron j masters of the kingdom agree to put up their balf-a-crown a i ton, they can very well afford to pay their men an extra price for raising it ; but if all the farmers of Norfolk or, indeed, of England were for once united, they could not raise the price of wheat 2d. per bushel. It was said this year by a high autho- rity in the House of Commons that the wealth of this country j had increased during the past five years to the astounding amount of £1,500,000,000. I fail to comprehend so vast a sum, but, after taking out Sundays and holidays, it is some- thing like a million a day increase. How much of that in- creased wealth has found its way into this quiet locality ? Landlords know their expenses increase, but I am not aware that there is any general rise in rents. It certainly requires more money to stock a farm, but I do not believe tenants' profits are any larger. You have been earning better wages than you ever did before ; yet you with large families doubtless find it necessary to spend more, and you young men discover that skittles, beer, and sweethearts swallow up all your cash. I therefore come to the conclusion that only a microscopic proportion of the " leaps and bouudi" of England's prosperity has lallen to agricultute, and of that little a chief part, at any rate a large proportion, lias been secured by the labourers. If the foundation of your Unions had been right, they must have prevailed in the Newmarket Lock-out. The whole world was on your side. A bishop said the " fanners were mad," noble lords sympathised with you, M.P.'s raised their voices and opened their purses on your behalf. Trades' Unions gave you money for support. Public opinion was entirely with you, and so was the whole London Press. The contest was carried on for six months in the busiest part of tlie agricultural year ; and at harvest, when you were assured your triumph would be complete, your leaders, with cruel irony, told you they could no longer maintain you in idleness — an idleness which they themselves enforced. But strikes open farmers' eyes. I had two last year, and in consequence I managed to reduce my labour account £100. It may be done by employing new machinery, keeping more land in grass, putting out work, employing fewer regular labourers and hiring a tew odd hands when they are wanted ; but the chief saving is in leaving much of the neat work of the farm undone. Time was when an untrimmed fence, a rough ditch, a few great stones, some sprawling weeds among the turnips, or even runaway mangolds, were pain and grief to me. I now regard them, if not with complacency, certainly with indifference. If this sort of tidiness can be secured at a certain price, as I am happy to say it can be now, the work is done ; if not, it remains undone, for I know the farm cannot afford it ; and if it could, no one nowadays thanks the farmer for employing profitless labour. We have been told that all the objectionable rules of the Union are withdrawn. I do not profess to know what they were. One, I believe, was that Unionists might strike at a week's notice. My experience is that they strike without any notice at all. Another was against piecework, whicli I contend is the only way in which a skilful and dexterous labourer can secure his fair wages. Shorter hours are demanded, while you know that, excluding haysel and harvest, when you receive extra wages, your day's work does not average nine hours. Lastly, the Unions are dead against yearly hires. I have said that in matters of work and wages I should make no difference between Union and uon-Union men. But I find, as I hire my team-men by the year, with so much extra weekly wages and so much standing wages payable at Michaelmas, I must have non-Union carters and shepherds, or, if they are Unionists, they break the rules of their order. Now, suppose farmers hired their cart-horses as well as their men, and one jobmaster should offer horses by the year and another by the week, with full liberty to deprive the farmer of the horses when he most needed them, woflld not the farmer pay more for the yearly horses and take more care of and feed them better than the others, and would he not most probably say to the other offer, " I shall prefer hiring your horses only when I really want them, even if I pay double the price you ask per week ? " Apply that to labourers and compare the yearly agreements of the North with the weekly hire insisted upon by the Union. I find the average pay of a common day labourer for the whole of last year was about 17s. Gd. In Northumberland and Scotland I am assured the value is nearly 25s., which, after making all allowances for locality, better market, &c., is greatly in favour of the long liire. Then lake the farmers' interest. Mr. Barclay, the member for Forfarshire, is, like me, a tenant-farmer, but, unlike me, he is fortunately a successful merchant as well. He farms 380 acres of arable land, which is exactly the amount of land I have at Honiugiiam. He has 75 acres of rough pas- ture, and I have 40 acres of good permanent grass ; he grows 20 acres more corn than I do, but he has less roots and more grass seeds than I have. Taking the cold, damp northern climate ]|into consideration, I should say he would require as much manual labour on his farm as I do on mine. But mark the difference. For the four years ending 1871 the average annual payment for labour (two-thirds in cash and one-third in milk, meal, potatoes, &;c.) was £100, while mine was £750. In 1872 and 1873 Mr. Barclay's had risen to £510, but as he puts £30 of it down to extraordiaary labour, he con- siders the real increase to be only 20 per cent. Now, take my expenditure for those years, whicli, being about £850 and £750, would average £800, and you must surely admit that which I knew long ago — that the Scotchman is a sharper and keener man of business than I am ; and 1 also come reluctantly to the conclusion that the highly-paid Scotch hind is a cheaper and better man than the Norfolk labourer, and that after all there is no such thing as cheap labour. Let us, the employer and the employed, take stock of our altered positions. You have elected to be independent — that supply and demand shall rule wages, that you w ill sell your labour in the dearest market, and, therefore, we farmers must buy in the cheapest ; that labour should combine : and consequently capital must do the same. I believe your choice, if you will giv cover striking and the an- sound features of Unionism, will in the end be better for us both. Wecertainly need be no worse friends. Two independent parties, if they really understand each other, do not want to quarrel 3&8 THE FAliMlOR'S MAGAZINE you may be less subservient, but quite as civil, and tlie farmer maybe more mathematically just without beiug harsh or un- kind. But I must irajiress upon you that you cannot expect to retaiu all the advantages of your former state. You must not be iudepeudent in the matter of wages only, but also be self-supporting and self-reliant. If you desire better pay, you should devote your energies to doing better work rather than to striving so hard for tlie greatest possible amount of pay for the least possible amount of labour. If you desire better cot- tages from the landowner, you must not expect to liire them at half their value; neither must you any longer expect your employer to fisd you employment all the year round, wet and dry, whether he wants you or wants you not ; nor ask him to pay you full wages because you are an ailing man and have a sick wife or a house full ol small children. Above all, you must not look to the rales to support you in sickness and old aj;e, nor to the parish doctor for medicine and porter ; and though, as lung as women have kindly liearts, the larmer's wife will still dispense her kitchen and dairy comforts, you must not regard them, as so many do now, as matters of business rather than of charity. If you find yourselves too numerous, instead of striking or shirking work, the young and vigorous men must emigrate to the North or to the Colonies. They will find I5s. in Norfolk go quite as far as a guinea in a manufacturing town, and if a strong, active, and sober labourer is careful and in- dustrious abroad he can soon save a lot of money, and so, I must add, in a limited degree, can any healthy, unmarried young man wlio will practise the same self-denial at home. The object of your leaders seems to be a desire to make every labourer discontented with himself and jealous of all aiound him ; but the unerring Word of God has said, " The poor shall never cease out of the land," and, therefore, you should use every legitimate means to improve your conditiou and work yourselves into a better one, rather than repine at your lowly lot. Both parties should rule their relations one to the other upon the golden maxim of doing to others as they would be done by ; and while the labourer must not forget the declara- tion, " Ye have the poor with you always," we farmers must specially remember the gracious words which followed—" And whensoever ye will ye can do them good." It has been charged against me tliat when I became a member of the Government I committed political suicide. Reading the criticisms in the agricultural papers and the speeches now made at agricultural meetings and at farmers' clubs, I have arrived at the conclusion that I was something like " the dear departed husband," who had become a perfect saint when dead, but who, somehow or other, contrived to beat his wife when alive. Whenever I am silent upon an agricultural question discussed in the House of Commons, I am sure to be " twitted ;" but it was not until I had duly considered my constituents' interests and my own position that I ven- tured to accept the post offered me by the Prime Minister, regarded it as a great compliment paid through .-..e to the constituency, and thought I ought to accept it unless there were good and sufilcient rea- sons for not doing so. Without egotism I also believe that the post ofi'ercd me was one that I could fill, being mainly connected with the administration of the Poor-law, to which I have always paid particular interest. As to the legislation of tlie past Session, very little had been done, it was true, but the department with which I am connected, the Local Government -Board, had passed one good measure, the Rating Bill. Eor hat bill I have striven since 1868. for its necessity in the ptereat of justice, among other instances, there was the fact tiiat the ironstone mines, with all the wealth they returned, ua not contributed a sixpence to the local rates. If nothine else had been done, the passing of that useful measure entitled the Government to their thanks. As to future agricultural legislation, although of course, I could not bring in the Tenant- Right Bill which had been before introduced by Mr. Howard and myself, yet, having access to "the powers that be," I lost no opportunity of insisting that compensation to tenants for un- exhausted improvements ought to bejembraced in a measure next session. Answering an imaginary question, "How do you like your ofKcial lite," I say, " I don't like it at all." To the office work I have no objection, and I consider the per- manent officials of the Government Board an excellent, meri- torious, but underpaid class of public servants ; further, I have no objection to committee work, but I do not like the House of Commons. After being at the office from eleven to five o'clock I am marched down to the House, with a certainty of not beiug able to leave it for dinner or for a walk until one o'clock. Nothing so dull, tiresome, and irksome has been ex- perienced by me since I went to school. In fact, I might alter the nursery rhyme thus : Speak when you arc ordered, Vote as you are told ; Make a house, keep a house, Or the Whips will scold. I assure you I have at heart as much as ever the interest of the tenant-larmers of Eugland, and I shall use my utmost endeavours to see that it is not forgotten ; and if I find that your cause is wilfully or even carelessly disregarded, I shall not long continue to be a member of Her Majesty's Adminis- tration. But I do not believe that it will be. On the con- trary, when the time comes you will find that Her Majesty's Goverument is quite prepared to do justice to the tenant- farmers of Eugland. "THE COW THEORY." TO THE EDITOR OF THE MARK LANE EXPRESS. Sir, — lu your account of the speeches delivered at the luncheon on the occasion of the sale of Mr. Henry Stan- ley's farming effects, at Fornhain Lodge Farm, Bury St. Edmunds, Mr. Hunter Rodwell, the new member for Cambridgeshire, is reported to have said, " he believed the time was very far distant when the ' cow theory' would come into operatiou — the theory, that a mau with live acres of land should maintain himself, his family, and a cow. If Lord Bristol, the Duke of Grafton, and Mr. Benyon, for instance, were to give up five acres each to all who wished it, he thought it would not be very long before some large capitalist bought up all the cows aud calves." With this opinion of Mr. Rodwell I should pro- bably have been inclined to agree, had it not been proved to me last year, while on a visit at Sir Baldwin Leigh- ton's, that exactly the contrary is the case, where the " cow theory" has been in actual practice for many years. On Sir Baldwin Leighton's estate in Shropshire pauper- ism is almost exterminated by means of the cow, it being the rule rather than the exception for a labourer to have sums varying from £20 to £80 put by iu the savings bank, out of ihe proceeds of the sale of butter. I have seen the books with the sums entered to their credit. Most cottages hav e two or three small fields attached to the holding, mostly laid down iu grass. The cow, how- ever, is only a second string to the labourer's bow, and does not in auy way interfere with his giving efficient service to the farmer as the cow can be looked after by the wife, who makes the butter and sends it to market by the can-ier. I am only too well aware that there are many districts, where, from the lightness of the soil aud a small rainfall, it is almost hopeless to lay down land in grass, and where the " cow theory" will not work, hut I am anxious to point out what a great boon the cow is to the labourer where grass will grow, as it will iu a large portion even of East Anglia, though not on the light lands of Norfolk and Cambridgeshire. Yours faithfully, W. H. Hall. Six Mile Bottom, Neivmarket, Oct. \4sth. ANOTHER AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE.— At a com- mittee meeting of the North-east Agricultural Association of Ireland, a communication was read from the secretary of the Society of Arts, London, asking the co-operation of the North-east Agricultural Association in the founding of an Agricultural College, in which it is proposed to hold periodical " examinations in the technology of agriculture, and rural economy, with the view of promoting a more extended and intelligent study of agriculture and of the sciences bearing upon it." THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 399 CONTAGIOUS DISEASES (ANIMALS) ACT. A mcetiiij? of 1I18 comralttces appointed by the local authori- ties of the couuties of Aberdeen, Banff, and Moray, to bring the state of the existing law as to contagious diseases among animals under the notice of tlie Duke of Richmond, President of the Privy Council, who controls the Veterinary Department, was lield at Keith. There were present — on belialf of Aberdeen- shire— Sherilf Comrie Thomson, Colonel Inues of Learney, Mr. Barclay, M.P., and Mr. Scott, Glendronach ; on behalf of Banffshire — Sir George Macpherson Grant, ]5art., and Mr. Garland, Cowhythe ; on behalf of Moray— Dr. Maclean, Elgin; Provost Cameron, Elgin; Mr. Geddes, Orblistou ; Mr. Williamson, Sliempstou ; and Mr. Yule, Coulard Bank ; Sir George Macpherson Grant iu the chair. Sheriff Thomson having explained the circumstances unde'' whicli the committees had been appointed by the tliree coun- ties, stated that the Aberdeen Committee held a meeting on Friday for the purpose of coming to an understanding as to the matters to be laid before the Duke of Richmond. The first defect in the existing law related to the period during which a place infected with pleuro-pneumonia was subject to the restrictions of the Act after the last fresh case. The Aber- deenshire Committee were unanimous in thinking the period of thirty days too short. The second was that the provisions of the Act for enforcing the slaughter of cattle alfected with pleuro-pneumonia should be put in operation in Ireland as well as in England and Scotland, as the experience of this district showed that the importation of Irish cattle was a fruitful source of tbe disease. On this matter, too, the Aberdeen Com- mittee was unanimous. And the tliird point related to tlie remissness of certain local authorities, and the want of uni- formity in enforcing the law throughout the kingdom. In the counties here represented the provisions of the Act were, he believed, properly enforced ; but there was too much reason to believe that in certain counties comparatively slight efforts were made to exterminate disease. The CiiAiRJiAX suggested that these points might be dis- cussed one by one. Mr. Barclay, M.P., said there was a general concurrence of opinion that the period of thirty days provided by tbe Act was too short, but differences existed as to how tar it sliould be ex- tended. Some thought sixty days sulhcient, others thought it should be three months, and others even four months. The Select Committee in tlie House of Commons in tlieir report had recommended sixty days. He had suggested three months ; but on further consideration, he thought sixty ddys as long as C'juld be effectively enforced. If the period were made three or four months, licenses for removals would be extensively re- quired, and in granting licenses he feared laxity would prevail. Sixty days would be a great improvement, and as long a period as could be enforced with efficiency. After fully discussing the question in its different bearings, the meeting were unanimously of opiniau that although the disease might re-appear after a longer interval tlian two months, that period was as long as could be effectively en- forced. The second point — namely, that the provisions as to slaughtering animals affected with pleuro-pneumonia should be extended to Ireland — was then taken up. Mr. Barclay stated that he was of ©pinion (and he knew that his opinion was generally shared by those taking a lead- ing interest in the subject in England and some couuties in Scotland), that they could not hope to be successful in exter- minating this disease unless the same policy of slaughtering out was pursued iu Ireland as on this side of the Channel. The efforts to eradicate the disease liad been so far successful, but it was from time to time again imported into the country, and in the case of the north-eastern counties, investigation showed that a large proportion of the new outbreaks were due, directly or indirectly, to Irish cattle, lie believed the slaughter- ing of diseased cattle would be more beneficial to Ireland than to England and Scotland, for he was sure he would be borne out in stating that the doubtful character of Irish store cattle as regards disease, depreciated their price in this country 10 to 15 per cent. It was clearly unjust that this country should h e put to the heavy expense of attempting to slaughter out the disease, so long as it was renewed by the import of Irish cattle. He believed these views were so strongly held in England that if the compulsory slaughtering was not extended to Ireland, strong representations would be made to the Privy Council by English local authorities to have the Order in Council for compulsory slaughter in England and Scotland re- scinded. Sheriff THOJIso^" suggested that the Duke of Richmond should be informed that the three countries vvere clearly of opinion that.these provisions should be continued, and extended to Ireland. The Chairman said that so long as they were bound to slaughter affected animals in Scotland and England, he saw no reason why Ireland should be exempt. The local authority of this country certainly approved of that provision. Provost Cameron said that they were aUo approved of in Morayshire. It was then unanimously agreed to urge on his Grace the necessity of rendering the slaughter of affected animals compulsory in Ireland. Necessity for Uniformity in Enforcing the Law. — The third point was then discussed, and the meeting was una- nimous in thinking that there was great laxity in carrying out the provisions of the Act in certain parts of the kingdom, and that the Duke should be requested to give the matter his serious consideration, with tlie view of having the law more stringently and uniformly enforced. Colonel Innes thought it might be weU to suggest to his Grace some way by which it could be enforced more strictly and uniformly, whether by the appointment of Government inspectors or otherwise. Sheriff Thomson concurred in thinking it might be desir- able that Government inspectors should be appointed, but thought the details of the matter might be left to the Duke. Mr. Garland complained of the number of Orders in Coun- cil iu force, and of the difficulty experienced by local authori- ties in understanding the law they had to carry into effect. The meeting concurred in the view that a simplification and consolidation of the various Orders in Council were extremely desirable ; and if a settled policy iu dealing with disease was adopted and adhered to by the Government, local authorities and the public generally would become familiar v«ith the law, and have mucli less difficulty in carrying out the various regu- lations. Mr. Barclay then called attention to the fact that in most counties there were several local authorities, and in consequence a want of uniformity of action , He thought it very desirable that the burghs should be alraalgamated with the counties iu which they are situated, with proper representation of the burghs at the county board. He had brought this under the notice of the Select Committee of the House of Commons, and they had reported that amalgamation was desirable in Scot- land, that the general expenses should be levied over the whole district, and the cost attending the slaughter of cattle only over the burgh or landward part of the county wherein the slaughter takes place. The meeting unanimously agreed that this alteration of the Act should also be recommended to the Duke of Richmond. Sheriff Thomson tiien moved that a deputation should be appointed to wait on the Duke of Richmond, and bring these matters under his consideration. This was agreed to, and three gentlemen were chosen from each of the tliree counties. Eor Aberdeenshire, Sheriff Thomson, Colonel Innes, of Lear- ney, and Mr. Barclay, M.P. ; for Banffshire, Sir George Mac- pherson Grant. Mr, Taylor, of Glenbarry, and Sheriff Gordon ; and for Morayshire, Provost Cameron, Dr. Maclean, and Mr, Geddes, Orbliston. THE YORKSHIRE WOLDS. — Major Cochrane, of Langtou Grange, Darlington, has just hired for a long term Lord Walsingham's house on Aldwark Manor, near Easing- wold, as well as one of the principal farms on the estate. — York Herald. [It would seem from this that Lord Walsing- ham has settled down to Norfolk as his home county.] 400 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. THE PLEURO-PNEUMONIA ORDERS. At the 'nreting of tlie committee in Norwich, a discussion to^K place on a motion, of which notice had heea given by Mr. Jex Blake, as follows, namely, "That tlie Court of Quarter Sessions be requested to present a memorial to the Privy Council, praying that the order of the 3nd August, lS7o, as to the slaughter of cattle affected with pjeuro-pneumonia, be extended to the whole of the IJnited Kingdom ; or that such order be rescinded " Mr. Jex Blake duly moved liis resolution, which was seconded by Mr. R. Gillett. The Earl of Kijiberley said the line he took on the sub- ject in the few remarks he had made this year in Parliament was very much the same as tliat indicated in the resolution. It was clear that if the experiment of slaughtering cattle affected with pleuro-pneumonia were tried it must be tried lairly. It was ridiculous to pretend we were trying the ex- periment when we were sltughtering only in one part of the kingdom and not in unotlier. The thing was so absurd, as he siid in Parliament, and no one could venture to say a word n reply. He consulted the late Lord-Lieutenant of Ire- and. Earl Spencer, who liad much experience in Irisn atl'airs, on the subject, and he said tliat lie tliought the Order ought to ',be extended to Ireland. Althougli pleuro-pneumonia might not be bad now in Ire- land, yet it had been bad there. When he lived at Phojaix Park it was impossible for him to keep a cow alive, so bad was pleuro-pneumonia. Having Government money to spend he took the greatest possible pains ; but as fast as he got them iu they died. Phcenix Park was a hotbed of disease. It was a place where agist stock were taken in, and as it was not far from the markets, it might be imagined how the disease spread all over the country. Mr. C. S. Read, M.P., said there was now a very rigid ex- amination at the ports of embarkation in Ireland, and that the Privy Council were doing all they could by nspection to prevent the spread of the disease. That was what Privy Councils in England and Ireland had relied upon. But it was utterly impossible to detect a disease which was for so long a period incubating. The Earl of Kimberley : Absolutely impossible. Mr. Read said that there was said to be very little pleuro- pneumonia now in Ireland, but that did not prove to his mind it did not exist. The Government would find that the moment they gave compensation to owners of stock in Ireland affected with pleuro-pneumonia it would be found there would be many cases where there now was one. Speaking of the extent of the disease in Norfolk they were constantly being laughed at in the Privy Council because it was considered to be the most diseased county in England. Of course it was, because it was where there was sent the residuum of everybody's stock. If an ordinary Dullock could not be sold in Ireland, Scotland, or Wales, as a matter of course it came to Norfolk, where it found a market. And then they were told, after they killed an extraordinary quantity of stock — no less than a thousand a year — and paid upwards of £5,000 out of the county rate as compensation and inspectors' salaries, that they were not doing their duty. But he contended that Norfolk was doing its duty to the best of its power, regardless of the cost and trouble inflicted upon the owners of stock. When they applied to the official of the Privy Council for advice they were recommended to separate the healthy from the diseased cattle, and were told to take the temperature of the animals every morning to ascertain whether they were likely to become subject to the disease. He should like an inspector from the Privy Council office to be stationed on the Yarmouth marshes to have the fun of introducing a thermometer into the rectum of a bullock on those marshes, and he feared he would be sick of the performance at the end of the week (laughter), and when he returned to London he certainly would not recom- mend any such tomfoolery to them in Norfolk in future. The theory propounded by the veterinary surgeons of the day was that pleuro-pneumonia could only be communicated by the breath of a diseased animal. Therefore a lot of cattle might be huddled together and if there was not a diseased or partially diseased bullock amongst them they would not have pleuro-pneumonia. The Earl of Kijiberley supposed the breath of diseased animals was blown a long distance, for an animal belonging to him that was never in communication with any diseased animal had pleuro-pneumonia ; and what was more remark- able, none of the other animals took the disease. No doubt there were some indigenous cases of disease. The sudden change of climate had perhaps something to do with the disease of Irish cattle. There was a vast difference between the climate of Ireland and that of Norfolk, especially at the time of year when cattle were brought over. Many animals predisposed to disease then ran considerable risk. This was a stong argu- ment for bringing over only thoroughly sound cattle. Cattle coming from Galway and Balinasloe markets experienced a great change of climate, which had no doubt much to do with the disease. The resolution was unanimously agreed to. THE CONTAGIOUS NATURE OF PLEURO-PNEUMONIA. Recent investigations have thrown much light on the con- tagiousness of pleuro-pneumonia, and the means by which the disease extends the area of its existence. Like some other diseases affecting cattle which are known to be infectious, pleuro-pneumonia has been supposed to be easily communi- cated by disease to healthy animals, through various means othertaan tha( of actual cohabitation. It will be admitted that a correct solut.'on of a question of this kind is of considerable importance to the best interests of the country, and that it must greatly assist local authorities in deciding what is best to be done to stay the progress of the disease. It has long b een known that we have been dissentients to the views enter- tained by many veterinary surgeons, that pleuro-pneumonia — ike cattle plague, for example — can be freely communicated by fames. The failure of the so-called pleuro-pneumonia inoculations, so extensively practiced for upwards of twenty years, in Europe and elsewhere, to produce the disease in the animals operated upon, shook our belief originally in the facile contagiousness of the disease. As far back as 1853 we dwelt on this in our report to the Royal Agricultural Society on tne inoculation of cattle, and the experience since gained has only tended to confirm the opinion then enunciated. The revival of the question consequent on the adoption of legisla- tive measures for stamping out pleuro-pneumonia led us, in 1870, to have recourse to some further experiments with a view to its solution. The details of these were communicated at the time to the Royal Agricultural Society, and pubhshed in their Journal: " The first experiment consisted in exposing a steer to the inhalation of the vapour of some diseased lungs. for this purpose a dairyman's cow, suffering from pleuro- pneumonia in its advanced stage, was killed, and the lungs immediately removed from the chest and placed with the experimental animal in a closed loose-box, care being taken so to secure the head of the steer that at each inspiration the vapour should enter the respiratory organs. The steer was kept in this position until the lungs had become cold ; but even then they were not removed from the box, it being deter- mined to leave them with the animal until visible decomposi- tion had begun. The animal was carefully watched day by day until the expiration of the tenth week, but not the least deviation from health was observed during any part of the time. Subsequently it was determined to repeat the experi- ment in a modified form, and for this purpose a sponge was placed in the nostril of a diseased cow, and allowed to remain until it had become thoroughly saturated with the breath and also with the mucus discharged from the nostril. It was then transferred to the nostril of an experimental animal, and retained there for upwards of half an hour. As in the former THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 401 case, the animal was closely watched I'or several weeks ; but again no ill effects followed. Besides these two experiments, some mucus obtained from the respiratory organs of diseased cattle was rubbed, on several occasions, upon the mucus membrane of the nostrils of other experimental animals, with a view to effect its absorption. These experiments had also a negative result." Some additional experiments have since been instituted. It was tirst determined to ascertain whether any portion of the serous exudation from a diseased lunfc could safely be injected into the lungs of an animal. For this purpose two sheep were selected, and a drachm of exudation tluid injected into the left lung of each by puncturing the upper part of the chest with a small tubular stylet fitted to a syringe. The animals presently began to feed with quite a natural appetite, and did not apparently suffer any pain. They were kept under close observation, and their temperature registered day by day, but no indications of disturbed health were detected. Weeks passed away, and during the whole time they remained perfectly healthy. On April 10th of the present year two drachms of serous exudation from the lung of a cow, the sub- ject of pleuro-pneumouia, were injected into the left lung of an eight mouths old heifer-calf. At the same time a like quan- tity was injected into the left jugular veiu of another calf of the same age ; and to a third calf, seventeen days old, half an ounce of the same fluid uii.red with two ounces of milk icds j iven as a draught. As no ill effect had been recognised in either animal by April 12th, an ounce of the same serous exudation was given to the yonnr; calf, mixed with milk as before. A microscopic examination of the fluid showed the presence of Bacteridies in large numbers. On the 15lh the young calf gave evidence of blood- poisonhnj, and on the evening of the 16th it died. No lesions, other than those common to blood- poisoning, were met with on a /)o,9//)iorfc/« examination, in any organ of the body. The heifer-calves, like the sheep, entirely escaped any pulmonic attacks ; indeed, with the ex- ception of a small slough being detaclied from the site of the pucture into the jugular vein, they have continued well down to this time — a period of upwards of five months. In the month of June last two other experiments of a similar kind were had recourse to, the subjects being a young steer and heifer, both about teu months old. Six drachms of exudation fluid from a diseased lung were injected into the lung of one animal, and the same quantity into the windpipe of the other. Both these animals gave indications of local disease in little more than a fortnight afterwards, and in another fortnight one died and the other was killed. In both cases, however, the lungs toere found perfectly free from these lesions which specially belong to pleuro-ptieumonia. It is thus conclusively proved that pleuro- pneumonia does not extend the area of its existence by any of the ordinary means which cause the spread of infectious diseases. Full details of these experiments will appear in next number of the Journal of the Royal Agricultu- ral Society. — The Veterinarian. SHROPSHIRE CHAMBER OF AGRICULTURE. At the annual general meeting, Mr. Jasper More in the chair, the following report of the committee for the year ending September 29th, IST-i, was read : The committee, in making their eighth annual report, have to announce tiiat during the past year the Society has lost through deaths, withdrawals, and removals, 57 subscribers, but has added to its strength by the enrolment of 45 new members. The number of subscrib- ing members now on the books is 649. Two discussions have taken place in Shropshire during the last year. The first, an adjourned discussion on the poor relief, showed the feeling in favour of rigidly enforcing the workhouse test to be different at Welhngton to what it was, as shown by a previous discus- sion at Ludlow. The committee wish to draw attention to the want of unanimity amongst different boards of guardians as to the principles of affording poor relief, and suggest that the various boards in this county should use their influence to bring about by conference or otherwise a greater uniformity of action in the administration of poor relief in the different unions. The object of the second discussion of the Chamber at Bridgnorth is shown by the following resolution proposed by Mr. B. Dudfield, seconded by Mr. E. Rainforth : "That this Chamber considers that the over-preservation of game and the absence of Tenant-Right are among the principal detri- ments to the improvement of agricultural land, and is of opinion that such a bill as that introduced into the House o Commons by Messrs. Howard and Read last session, and one to protect the occupying tenant from injury from over-preser- vation of game, are necessary for the improvemeut of such land." The committee are glad to find some concession made to ratepayers, though not so large as expected, in the manner of increased subvention to the expenses of police and lunatics. They regret to hear, however, as a matter of general rumour, that the Government are advised to stop the usual payment awarded to Shropshire on behalf of the expenses of the police, as well as the additional one, on account of the alleged inef- ficiency of the police force of the county. The President and Mr. Bowen Jones attended the Malt-tax deputation to the Chancellor of the Exchequer, but while the surplus at the disposal of the Government was unparalleled in amount no concession was made or any expectation held out to the agri- culturists of their claims being considered in future. Only 18 members were found to vote for the repeal of the Malt-tax, when the subject being declined by Colonel Barttelot was taken up by Mr. Fielden. The committee are glad to find the name of Mr. Gore amongst this number, but regret that he was the only Shropshire member who supported Mr. Fielden on the occasion. The committee regret that the expectation embodied in their report of last year, that the bill of Messrs. Howard and Read giving compensation for unexhausted improvements would be re-introduced in the last session, has not been fulfilled ; whilst they consider it possible that a permissive bill may be introduced on the subject they regret to see no sign of the measure previously supported by this Chamber being brought forward. Mr. Stanley Leighton said there was one remark he should like to make. There was a paragraph in the report which stated that the allowances from the Government tor the police rate had been refused to this county. He wished to state that that was incorrect. The Chairman : 1 think you are mistaken. Mr. S. Leighton : Then read it again, if you please. The Secretary read the paragraph alluded to. Mr. S. Leighton said he thought it best not to mention it in the report, as the matter was still under consideration. If the grant was refused he thought it quite proper for the rate- payers to know of it, and consider the matter ; but since it had not been refused he thought it unwise to mention it in a re- port of that sort. The Chairman : Do you move the omission of the para- graph ? Mr. Leighton : No, 1 merely notice it. It struck me it was unwise to introduce it since it is based upon incorrect information. The Rev. E. Wartek : As one of the members of the Police Committee I beg to state that it is incorrect inasmuch as the report of Col. Cobbe is that he has no complaint to make of the police, excepting as to their inefficiency in point of numbers, which is a very different thing from the " in- efficiency of the police force in the county," as will be under- stood from the report. It was on that ground only that Col. Cobbe stated that he could not see how he could make such a report as will get the grant for the county. Mr. J. Bather said he disagreed with all the report, and he wished to call the attention of the Chamber to what he con- sidered to be a violation of the charter of the Chamber by such a report as that read having been issued, and by that Chamber being asked to sanction it. He did Hot think it was any part of the business of the committee to express all these " regrets" upon political subjects, over which members might hold different opinions. He did not believe the committee did " regret" when they said they did, his opinion being that what was alluded to were things thrown out for political pur- poses. Having read the rule under which the committee acted, Mr. Bather pointed out that its memho— "...o uuuaeu from north and south, independent of their political views. 402 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. The committee met, he urged, to transact the business of the society, and, if in a private asseml)ly, they expressed politiciil opinions, and embodied thera in their report, it was iu strict violation of the rules of the Chamber. When they met for public discussion, lie always advocated for others, as he claimed for himself, the greatest liberty of speech ; but if the committee are to be permitted to sit privately, to discuss and to vote upou political matters, and if the opinion of those in the minority are to be compromised by those in the majority, he believed it would prove fatal to the Chamber. Let thera look at the report. He was a member of the committee, and he was made to regret that only one of their members voted for the repeal of the Malt-tax. But he did not regret it ! He was glad that £8,000,000 had not been thrown away, that their barley was still protected, and that they were getting a good price for it. He did not regret that there was a rumour that the police allow- ance was not to be paid by Government to the county. If the gentlemen who undertook to manage the affairs of the county were to be bribed to do what they thought was not right, or necessary, by the gift of public money, there would be an end of all public dealing, and he was glad that this county had set the example of holding up their hands against such a state of things and that they refused a small trumpery sum which they did not care about. He should not move that the report be sent back to the committee (for that would be a round-about way), but that, as was sometimes said when a person signed a paper which he had not time to read — that it be received "errors excepted." He saw no harm ^iii the report being received in that way, but he was strongly opposed to having his convictions compromised by its being adopted in the usual manner. Mr. BowEN .Jo^■ES said it seemed to him important that the clause should appear. It had already been the means of elicit- ing more information upon the subject than the committee was aware of. Notwithstanding that, they had applied to the Clerk of the Peace for information. It seemed to him, after working for five or six years in the cause of local taxation, and liaviug got a small modicum of relief from the present Government, in the shape of a greater allowance to the county police, it seemed very hard they should now sacrifice £4,000or £5,000 in a siujfle couuty. He was very glad tlie paragraph had appeared iu the report, and he thought it was perfectly harmless, for it did not say that the allowance would not be paid, but thst there was a rumour about it. If the money was not paid, the members of that chamber, being large rate-payers, would like tokuow why. He thought that it pointed plainly to the fact that couuty finance boards ought to be established ; aud he hoped a measure with that object would be brought for- ward next year. Mr. Bathek asked the chairman whether, iu his opinion, it formed any part of the duties of the committee to make such report. I'he Chairman' read from the rules what were the objects of the Chamber, and said he thought it was entirely within tlic pro- vince of the committee to make remarks upou political mea- sures. He wished to say, in confirmation of his opiuion, that in the report of last year those matters were discussed iu the freest possible manner, aud Mr. Bather was on the committee at the time. The Rev, E. Wakter : I shall second Mr. Bather, simply on the giound of the one paragraph which Mr. Bowen Jones thinks is desirable, and which I look upon as a mis-state- ment. Mr. Bather called attention to rule number four, and asked the chairman if he held that the business of the committee was not limited to transacting business in the stricter sense of the word, but also to express opinions upon political matters. The CiiAiRMAA said he should be very sorry to set his opinion against that of former chairmen, and, as others had allowed it, he was not going to rule differently. Mr. Bather said till the question was raised it could not be decided. If the committee was consideredjustified iu expressing an opiuion upon all political subjects that came before them,and if the opinions of the minority were to be compromised iu that way, all he could say was that never again would he sit upon a committee unless it was elected in a ditferent way. Mr. Jones : I should be sorry to support the paragraph. Mr. Warter and Mr. Leighton object to if it can be shown to be a mis-statement. The Rev. E. Warter : It is not Colonel Cobb who grants, or who does not grant the money. He makes a report, and upon that report the Government will act, unless they see cause to alter thei/ opiuion, as 1 believe they will do in this case. Colonci Cobbe complains of inefliciency in point of numbers, which is a very different thiug from what will be understood by the report. Mr. Jones said he did not see that Mr. Warter had proved his assertion, for he admitted that there was inefficiency of some sort. Mr. Stanley Leighton thought it was unwise (or them to set about discussing rumours. He thought as large ratepayers they had a right to discuss all questions connected with the rates. But the question was, how far they were wise in get- ting hold of a rumour aud acting upon it. He was speaking under correction, but he believed that Colonel Cobbe had no business to " advise" the Government ; and yet in the report it was stated that the Government were advised. He should like to know who advised the Government. He could see what was the feeling of the Chamber with regard to the mat- ter. It was this : " You are trying to prevent us discussing matters counected with the rates." He fully agreed that the members of that Chamber ought to discuss matters connected with the rates ; the only question was whether they ought to discuss them before they iiad got something tangible before them. There were plenty of subjects for them to disc\iss, and plenty of things for thera to lay hold of; and was it wise, before the time, to lay hold of a matter of that sort, and put it into tlie report ? There was not a question connected either with agriculture or with the rates that he should not like to see discussed by them ; but was the committee sure it was cor- rect that the Government was " advised" to withdraw the grant ? Certain private letters had, he knew, passed upon the subject, and who had given information in regard to them ? Whoever had done so had been guilty of a sort of breach of confidence. Mr. Jones complained that the Clerk of the Peace had not laid the whole subject before them — Mr. JoNE.s : We did not know whether the correspondence was private or public, aud, as a body of ratepayers, we applied to the Clerk of the Peace for information, ana the answer we had was that he could not give it to us. Mr. Stanley Leighton said, of course, the Clerk of the Peace could not ; and he again urged that it would not be wise to insert the paragraph in the report. The Rev. E. Warter said if Mr. Jones would consent to insert the words " in point of numbers" after " inefficient," he should be satisfied. As it was, he looked upon the paragraph as a mis-statement. Whether magistrates or not magistrates, they were all anxious that they should have an efficient police force, and they were also anxious, if they could, to get the allowance from Government. Crime had of late diminished greatly in the county, and he should not like it to go forth that the poHce were inefficient in any respect but the one he had mentioned. Mr. Jones said he had no objection to add the words Mr. Warter had suggested. Mr. Bather again urged that the report should he adopted, " errors excepted." ;_ Mr. Minor said he saw nothing political about the report. Mr. Bather : Do you not contider the repeal of the Malt- tax a political question ? Several Members : No, certainly not. Mr. T. HoRTON : I think if this Chamber is not to discuss political questions, the sooner it is dissolved the better. Mr. Harding asked what they were to discuss if they were not to discuss such subjects as those in the report ? He be- lieved the duties of the committee to be to transact all the ordinary business of the Society, to draw up and present the report, and to call the attention of the Chamber to any agri- cultural questions which had arisen, or were likely to arise. He understood that the committee had to bring all such matters before the Chamber, otherwise how were things to be brought forward? As to the Malt-tas, he believed the Chamber had already come to a resolution in favour of its repeal or reduction. He regretted, and he thought they all regretted, that neither had been done — and yet it was urged that they had no right to mention it iu their report. Mr. Bather said he proposed at the committee meeting that the subject be brought before the Chamber, but the word " regret" should not be put in. He simply wanted the atten- tion of the Chamber to be called to it. The committee should THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 403 couflne itself to reportiug facts. jN'o man wlio sat ou the committee could say that he had ever wished to suppress facts : what he wished to suppress in the report were opinions. Mr. Harding said the Chamber would be asked '.o say whether or not it did regret that Mr. Gore was the only mem- ber who supported Mr. I'ielding and the only one who had severed himself from his party for tlie good of his constituents. If those questions were not to be raised and if their members of the Chamber were not allowed to tell their representatives whether they were serving them rightly or wrongly, then the sooner the better they abolished the Chamber. As regarded tiie inefficiency of the police, if they were inefficient and so the county lost the Government grant he did not see that it mattered much what the cause of inefficiency was. If it simply arose from inefficiency of strength it was a lesser evil, but still it was inefficiency. He thought, however, that the addition of the words Mr. Warter suggested would meet the objection which had been raised. Mr. J. R. 0. Gore, M.P., said he should not have risen liad not his name been so prominently brought forward ; but he wished to explain the grounds upon whicli he had acted differently to the rest of the members of the county. When he was returned, one of the very few pledges he gave was that he would do all he could for the reduction or the repeal of the Malt-tax. He did not think the question was brought forward at the right time, and he urged Mr. Pielding not to press it un- less he saw some better chance of success ; but having given his word he supported Mr. Fielding. He should give the same vote again if the subject was brought forward, as he hoped it would be, and when it was, he hoped it would be more favourably received. Mr. Gore concluded by moving the adoption of the report with the addition of the words suggested by Mr, Warter. Mr. C. C. Cotes, M.P., seconded the proposition, and it was carried by a lar^e majority. Mr. ]MoRE, the chairman, recollected once saying i:i i.iat room that if they met in three years' time they would not, he believed, have got compensation for unexhausted improvements, and he still believed it was a very difficult thing to carry. He did not think there was any member in the present House of Commons that was likely to bring forward Sir Massey Lopes' bill. A gentlemen wlio was once president of that Chamber, Mr. Tomline, had remarked that Chambers of Agriculture might do harm insteadof good, because members attached too much importance to them, and paid too little attention to what was done in Parliament. He thought Chambers of Agriculture should take every opportunity of expresing their opinions upon political questions, meaning of course, agricultural political question, and not party political questions. He thought it was satisfactory to find that tliey had made some impressions upon the Government in regard to financial matters, and he was sorry to hear Mr. Bather talk of the sums given by the Govern- ment as trumpery. Mr. Bather said he meant trumpery when he compared it with the loss of honour. Mr. More said he did not suppose that anyone expected that honour should be sacrificed for a bribe. The CuARMAN said a communication had been received from the Central Chamber stating that the question of the main- tenance of highways was shortly to be discussed. Colonel Corbett, M.P., proposed that it also form the subject of the next discussion of the Shropshire Chamber. Mr. Mansell : I should like to discuss how we are to keep our stock during the next winter. I think that would be a very proper subject. KELSO FARMERS' CLUB. AUTUMN MANURING. At the usual monthly meeting, Mr. Wm. Purves, Linton Burnfoot, in the chair, the subject set down for discussion was " Should dung be applied to stubble or lea in autumn ?" Mr. George Sholto Douglas, Riddleton Hill, said : I have selected as the subject of our evening's discussion the disposal of farmyard manure in autumn. I think this is a question which we ought to study carel'ully, inasmuch as the cost of producing this manure is always on the increase — that is to say, cattle, straw, turnips, cake, and attendance cost more than they used to do, as it were, yesterday, and there is every probability that their price will not be diminished, but rather enhanced, by to-morrow. What is more proper, therefore, than that we should think of how we can obtain full value for this important product of the farm ? I have not got the results of any experience to offer to you, as experiments, espe- cially in agriculture, are tedious, costly, and often misleading. As regards the case in point, it would require experiments extending over many years, and carried on simultaneously at not a few different places, and under different conditions of soil and climate to convince me of the superiority of one sys- tem over another, and we must therefore look at the matter in the light of common sense if any such be afforded us. The manure I refer to is that made during the spring, at the conclusion of the feeding season, and which, byjstress of time, or from being in too crude a state, cannot be applied to the turnip crop before sowing. This, being made when cattle are improving, or well advanced in condition, and during a season of the year best adapted for the purpose by reason of its dry- ness, ought to be the best that is produced on the farm. I say ought to he ; and, indeed, wlien it is made in boxes or covered sheds it is the best. But, gentlemen, with the system of open courtyards that unfortunately prevails in this district, what is the state in which we find the dung after harvest, alter it has got all the summer rain ? As I was preparing of the paper which I now read to you, my people were cleaning out the cattle courts, and it was really lamentable to see such stuff. It was nothing but cold, wet, black, half-rotten straws, with, 1 fear, every particle of fertilising vigour wasted out of it. What a contrast is presented to that which the boxes yielded, the latter beiug hot, dry, and smoking like a furnace. This, unfortunately forms only a small portion of what we have at our command. The question is therefore what to do with this stuff which we are pleased to call dung. When the summer work of the farm will not admit of anything being done towards preserving the contents|of the yard iu a good con- dition, and we have to remove them after harvest, the only thing is to take them to the land and cover them out of sight as soon as possible. It is the general practice to apply the manure to the stubble break that is intended for root crops in the following year, and, being spread, it is ploughed in and allowed to lie till the land is stirred preparatory to sowing. This is the quickest way of getting quit of it, but I am not sure it is put to the best use by such a method. We all know that it is a great point to get the stubble ploughed as dry as possible, aud that being done, we reasonably expect to liud it turn up in fine condition next spring. And, in order to insure this consummation, we plough into it a lot of wet straw. In ex- ceptionally fine weather the manure may dry after being spread, but the humidity which generally prevails after October sets in prevents this. Further, it keeps hold of all the rain which falls ; it cannot dry below the ground, aud the soil can- not help, as it dries, drawing continual supplies of moisture from what acts as a sponge. Can it be wondered at that land which has been autumn dunged often turns up, especially if it be clayey, worse than that which has not been so treated .P I have repeatedly seen it so, and the consequences are an in- creased application of artificial manure of the ammoniacal class, with their usual concomitants of over luxuriant straws aud imperfectly grown bulbs. It is stated that manuring stubble tends to keep the ground open and allow the frost to obtain readier access to it. I cannot see the force of this argument, as the frost, if it does get below the surface, con- geals the moisture it finds there, aud, departing, leaves the ground as it was before, and the surface being disintegrated by the falls down and seals up the lower stratum more elfect- ually than ever. Besides I have heard it stated in this room by gentlemen of undoubted authority that heavy land (which autumn manuring is supposed chiefly to benefit) is much better lelt untouched till the spring, and only lifted from the stubble before putting in tho turnips. If this be the case then, a 401. THE FARMER'S MAGAZiKE. fortiori, it does not profit to keep it open if ploughed, but rather to leave it as close as possible. If, on the other hand, dung be applied to lea, none of the ol)jeclions 1 have stated can be urged against its use. It is not nioistcr thau the her- bage with which thegouud is covered, and so can do no liarni by retaining wet. Containing a large proportion of silica, it is likely to promote the growth of straw in the corn crop. Tlie undissolved poition which is not taken up by the corn is much better amalgamated with tlie soil, and therefore more likely to be serviceable to the turnips. We continually see, both in autumn and spring dunged laud great masses of manure sticking above the surface and on the middle of the drills, yielding nourishment to nothing but weeds, and attract- ing flies and every species of abomination. All this would be avoided by raanuriug the lea. This method has another point in its favour. Most of us grow a few weeds among our corn, and a great many among our hay. The seeds of these get among the dung, and fermeutalion, often slight, does not kill them. Most of them will not germinate unless at a very small depth ; and there is a greater chance of their being brought to the surface the second year after they are deposited, and this is more likely to be accomplished by the stirrings which the land so frequently receives in the manipulations to which the turnip crop is subjected. These remarks may also apply to the seed of any of them that may flourish among the corn. I am unable to state whether the different times of applying dung may have any iuflueuce on the development of these insects which liarm us so much, but if any one could supply us with information on the point it might be turned to good account. When a crop of hay has been taken an application of dung is sureto prove very beneficial to land, us, besides the exhaustion which this crop is apt to induce, the stimulating manures which are often employed leave no fertilising effects, but rather the contrary. Nature abhors a vacuum, and fills up vacant space at her own discretion, and the best way to keep down such is to promote vigorous growth of useful plants. I might follow up the foregoing remarks by discussing the ad- visability of laying up all our dung, and applying it to the lea, but that would involve the consideration of subjects loreign to the matter in hand, and I would conclude by saying that it would be very profitable were the contents of the yards carted off dnring the summer as early as possible, and lay into a heap near the place where they are intended to be applied. In that case the manure could be laid on to the field and spread in frosty weather when there is nothing else doing. Mr. TJsiiER, Stodrig. — I must say that generally I approve very much of Mr. Douglas's suggestion, and I think he has taken a very scientific view of the subject. With regard to the laying oa of dung in the spring of the year, although I highly approve of that system, still it must be borne in mind that the labour question enters greatly into this question. If we were to leave all our dung to be put on in the spring of the year it would involve a great deal of extra labour, and, I think, if we look at the great question of convenience, it is a great benefit to get the dung made in the spring of the year laid on in the backend of the year when we have not so much to do. I have no doubt that dung laid on to the drill generally speaking goes further. There is a great deal of waste in 1 aying on dung in the backend of the year, and 1 also think it lias tlie effect of wearing the land a good deal by carting it on in the backend and ploughing it wet in. But a great many of the members of the club have steep land, and if they did not lay it on in the backend they could not get it on at all. In ad- dition to the extra labour it involves, it has the effect of levelling the drills and leaving the half of the dung on the surface. Looking at the subject from a practical point of view, the best plan is to lay on the dung we have made in the spring of the year the best way we possibly can, and to plough it in, and still leaves us with as much work as we can possibly overtake with the workers we have at our command. Mr. Howie, Iladdon, stated the system adopted in Yorkshire and Lancashire, and concurred generally with what Mr. Douglas had said. Mr. Robertson, Ladyrig. — If I read this subject aright it is simply a question to be answered, viz., Should dung be ap- plied to stubble or lea in autumn ? Now that the question has been thoroughly put before me, I think it is a subject for very fair criticism. To answer the question, I should certainly say has a great deal to do with the solution of the point. If any of you were to ask me whether I would put the dung I make on to my lea or my stubble, I would answer that I divide the thing. I would put a portion on my lea, and I would dung my stubble. There is one thing to which I would like to draw attention. I certainly think if we could throw back our crops a twelvemonth, or use something else for a year, we would profit greatly in after years. We would benefit both by the oats and the turnip crop, and, according to the quality, you could either give artificial dung or not ; but you must bear in mind that you sacrifice the first year's manure. Mr. Usher, Stodrig. — I am perfectly willing to take up what Mr. Robertson has said, and I do think that if we could manage to get a year in advance with the dung it would be a great advantage on a lea field. I think from the experience I have had there is one obstacle — we would be under the neces- sity of working entirely with extraneous manures, which very few farmers with plenty of dung would be inclined to do. iVom the experience I have had of laying dung on lea, it al- ways had a very good efi"ect on the oat crop. There is no doubt if you grow a strong crop of oats it has the effect of keeping down dirt and keeping the land cleaner. If you were to put extraneous manures on your turnip crop, there is no doubt that in the year succeeding the dunging you wonld have a better crop than you would have under other circumstances. If we were to adopt Mr. Douglas's principle of reducing the dung to a proper state before laying it on it would have this benefit : that we would be able to lay it on in frosty weather. But the labour question has to be considered, as it would in- volve a great deal of extra expense and extra labour. Mr. Robertson, Ladyrig. — I think, from what has fallen from the lips of Mr. Usher, that we must calculate what it costs to grow the crops. We must calculate that the labour market has risen 30 per cent. I think we should always keep in view what anything costs when introducing any change, and always keep in mind the price we have to pay for labour, as it is a very material question in the solution of any point as regards farming. Mr.PuRVES narrated his experience as regards the manur- ing of fields, and was of opinion that they should look at things as they generally stood, and not look a year before them. A vote of thanks was passed to Mr. Douglas for his paper, and a similar compliment having been paid to Mr, Purves in the chair, the meeting separated. THE HEXHAM FARMERS' CLUB.— The following subjects stand for discussion duringtheSessionl874' and 1875 ; Dec. 8th, Disintegration and Reconstruction — Mr. Spiers. Jan. 19th, the Exhaustion of the Soil of Ureat Britain — the President, Captain Nicholson. Feb. 16th, Ought Agricultural Politics be discussed by Farmers' Clubs, Mr. Newby Fraser. March 16th, Agricultural Measures before the House of Commons. April 13th, The Sheep of Scotland, and the Management of them — Mr. William Lyat, Caddonlee. SALE OF MESSRS. M'COMBIE'S BLACK POLLED CATTLE.— This sale was held at Afford. Mr. McCombie, M.P., exhibited a lot of 46 animals in capital con- dition, and mostly bred by himself. His cows were very heavy, admirably fleshed, well-bred animals, and with one or two exceptions early calvers. They brought the good average of £45 153,, which is the highest on record lor cows of the breed. This average, however, was surpassed by eight two- year-old heifers in calf, for they realised nearly £58 each. Ten yearling heifers averaged £35 a head. Four heifer-calves exceeded £23 each, and eight bulls sold fairly. The most handsome cow of the lot was Pride of Alford, the three-year-old which was first at Kelso as a yearling. Mr. Walker got her at 60 gs. The best of the two-year-old heifers was Ruth Second, which Mr. Barclay, Yonderton, took at70gs. The best pedigreed two-year-old was Diana, half-sister to Lord Huntly's cup cow, which went rapidly up to 76 gs. for Lord Airlie. The best yearling heifer was Nugget ; sold at 53 gs. The buU-calves did not sell so well as the female animals. Mr. M'Combie, of Easter Skene, got a very fair sale for 17 animals drafted from his herd. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE, 405 THE BAST LOTHIAN FARMERS' CLUB. DISEASES IN ANIMALS. At the first meeting for the season in Haddington, Mr. DouciLAS (Athelstaneford), the Chairman, intimated that the subject set down for discussion was. What steps should be adopted to prevent the spread of disease in the transit of cattle and sheep ? This, he said, was a very serious subject, and the present Government were anxious to do something to prevent the spread of disease in animals, and were desirous to obtain reliable information. The prevention of disease in animals was not only a most important matter to the farmers but to the community in general. There would, no doubt, be more or less disease in this country so long as the transit of stock went on. There were many difficulties in the way of preventing disease in cattle conveyed by rail or in steamer, but he had no doubt remedial measures could be pro- vided. Those parties in charge of stock moving about the country were desirous of attending as many markets as pos- sible, and in order to do this sometimes they drove their stock at too great a speed, thereby overheating and exhausting the animals. Thus exhausted and heated, tlie animals had no heart to feed, and often lay down, contracting cold and pro- ducing disease. They could not avoid transferring stock from one country to anothet. Erom Ireland, for instance, a great many cattle were brought to this country for feeding purposes. In fact, the conveyance of cattle across the Irish Channel had become a considerable trade. The animals were packed up into steamboats not specially adapted for the pur- pose, and containing very imperfect accommodation. It might be worth while considering whether or not special boats should not be built for the purpose of conveying stock from Ireland, containing plenty of room, ventilation, and shelter. From that, no doubt, good results would How. Very probably the cost of transit might be increased, but the better condition in which the animals would he disembarked would war- rant the paym-'nt of liigber charges. In these steamers the cattle were often huddled together in a very small space, and the excrements, specially the fluids, saturated the wood work on the deck so much that it was no wonder that disease was bred. He would have all decks and trucks for the conveyance of cattle thoroughly cleaned, and cloride of lime or any other disinfecting agents regularly applied. As steamers were kept just now cattle very often contracted disease, and then were sent all over the country before it made its appearance. Then as to the con- veyance of stock by rail, he thought cattle should not be sent more than 100 miles without water. A drink of good water was a most important thing the animals. It acted as food for the time being. If they got some such attention as that, the animals would go a long journey in much better form than they do presently when jammed together in trucks without either food or water for a journey of some hundred miles. Regarding the importation of cattle from abroad, there was a great danger of introducing disease in that way, but he did not wish to do anything calculated to spot the introduction of foreign cattle. No doubt it tended to reduce the prices of the home cattle by increasing the supplies, but still he did not complain of it on that account. Recently it had been said that those foreign cattle, as they were being sent mostly for beef, might be killed at the port of landing. But lately there had arisen a pretty extensive trade in dairy cows from Holland to this country. The animals were large, heavy, well-fleshed, superior milking cows, and they sold some of them at upwards of £30 — a high price for a dairy cow. Some went to cow-feeders and some to farmers. Such animals as these could not be slaughtered without considerable sacrifice on landing, and he thought that provision should be made for a thorough examina- tion as to their healthiness when they are embarked. This was quite as necessary as when they were disembarked. Some people think a quarantine should be instituted for foreign cattle. Many present would remember that some years ago a lot of condemned cattle were prevented from landing at Leith and the ship turned to sea, and the animals were thrown overboard. The carcases were washed ashore here and there over a large portion of the coast. This was most reprehensible conduct, and the Local Authori- ties should do everything in their power to prevent a repetition of such a thing. He thought people should not complain of the pressure of Privy Council enactments, so long as the measures were taken with the great end in view of lessening the spread of the disease throughout the country. At this moment that awful scourge the rinderpest was raging in the steppes of Russia, and with the foreign traffic going on it might be brought to this country. If such were unfortu- nately the case it would decimate their herds, and be a very sad tiling for the country, making them pay dear for the free- dom of importation, and telling on the food supplies for many years to come. He believed the hands of the Government would be strengthened if farmers' clubs throughout the coun- try seriously considered the subject, and offered suggestions founded on the experience of the various members. The chairman here stated that hs learned from a private letter received by one of the members of the club from Mr. Barclay, M.P. for Forfarshire, that a deputation of the local autliorities in the northern counties was being organised to wait upon the Duke of Richmond, President of the Council, on the subject, about the middle of this month. He was of opinion that this club should do what it could to co-operate with their brethren in the north in this movement. In reference to the treatment of disease after it had appeared, the farmers found considerable difficulty in carrying out the system of isolation. Farm build- ings now-a-days were, for economic purposes, so closely joined together that tiie means afforded for separation of diseased animals were insufficient. If some sanitary arrangement were established by which the animals affected by disease could be isolated, it would he a great matter. F'or instance, if a farmer went to the market and bought a horse, he found perhaps after the animal came home that it had got cold or disease, and as the farmer had no means to separate it from the rest of the horses, the infection soon spread over the whole of the stable. In some counties the amount of compensation paid to owners of animals slaughtered, by order of the local authority, was one-half of the value, in others two-thirds, and in some even three-fourths. If farmers and farmers' clubs throughout the country ventilated the matter properly, and gave advice and a helping hand to the Government, he believed something might be done. Mr. Paton (Standingstane) said it will not for a moment be dispnted that the subject before the Club to-night is of the utmost importance, not only to the British farmer, but to every British subject. It would have been not only interest- ing, but most satisfactory, to have had statistics of the num- ber and value of animals carried annually in Britain by rail, as well as of those imported from Ireland and the Continent. This could have been done so far, with time and a good deal of hunting up, but for practical purposes they can be done without. It is well known that the capital involved in live stock is something enormous, and yet the cattle trade is con- ducted in a most reckless and haphazard manner in many cases. The subject naturally divides itself into two — viz., transit by rail and transit by sea. As to the first we have heard a great deal lately about animals being so many hours on rail without water, and various sorts of trucks have been constructed and brought before the public with water troughs and other appliances for the comfort ol the cattle. That is all very well meant, and it is quite possible to fill these troughs at different stations, but the practical difficulty is great. Sup- pose a train of thirty or forty waggons filled with cattle start- ing from the next F'alkirk tryst, and allowing that the troughs were all filled when the cattle were put in, and suppose that the cattle had stood on the moor all day, the water in the troughs would very soon disappear, even before they got started. Then, suppose that the said cattle were to be in these trucks for .36 hours, or even longer, no doubt water would be a very excellent thing for them during that time, but where are the men to be got to supply it, even were every convenience at the stations. They might pretend to do it, but it would not be done, a great deal of time would be lost and expenses incurred. It seems to me that instead ef stop- 406 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. ping and attempting to water, eitiier by turning the animals out or running the water into the troughs, the much better plan is to hurry them to their destination, and see that they are not allowed to stand at side stations for hours as is some times done. But a very simple and easily-manatced atfair is the washiug out the trucks with hot lime each time they are used. Were this always done there would be decidedly less disease in the country. We believe that the railway officials do their best to have it done, as a rule, but it is often not done both for want of time and the material to do it with. Were stock owners to take the trouble of giving notice to the station officials that trucks properly cleansed would he required at a certain hour the following day, then if it turned out that from neglect these trucks had not been cleansed, and that the stock being forward had to be put in as they were, in such a caae the com- pany ought to ha sharply dealt with. It seems, then, that practi- cally in transit by rail the proper cleansing of tlie trucks is about the most that can be done to prevent the spread of dis- ease. In the transit by sea, however, more especially from Ireland and the Continent, many difficulties arise. It is a well-known fact that before Irish cattle were so plentiful in Scotland, pleuro-pneumouia was unknown, and that until we had cattle from the Continent rinderpest was only seen in print. But we must take tilings as we find them and make tlie best oftliem. We would perhaps like to be able to do without Irish and foreign cattle, but we can't. It is admitted that Irish cattle with us are much more liable to take pleuro than English are. Looking at the two, one would readily conclue that the Irisli would be the more hardy ; but the reason for the opposite is not far to seek. It is natural to suppose that the Irish farmer or dealer will not send to Britain any animals that he supposes have pleuro. We believe, as a rule, they are sound before entering the steamboats that ply between tne two countries, but there the fatal seeds are sown that often bear fruits months hence. How can it be other- wise ? Here are a lot of animals stowed away for hours in a space not sufficient for half the number, and with bad ventila- ♦ion in many cases. In a short time the temperature is some- thing intolerable. By the time the animals arrive at port and appear on the quay, they look as if they had just come out of a very dirty vapour bath, with their sides reeking, and so besmeared with dirt tiiat it is often impossible to tell the original colour. Driven from this, perhaps to lie the night, or even nights, ou the hare stones, witli the elements in all their wrath above, is it to be wondered that cases of pleuro are not even of more frequent occurrence than they really are? Of course, it is tiie interest of owners of steamers to put as many auiraals on board as possible. 1 thoro\ighly believe that those' steamers are tlie regular hotbeds of disease, and that Government could not do a wiser thing, not only for the farmer, but for the nation, than to compel companies to have vessels constructed on the most approved principles for the transit of Irish cattle, and having a certain amount of accommodation and space for each ani- mals. It would he also greatly to the advantage of tile Irish store farmer were such arrangements made, as farmers here would buy with much greater confidence than tiiey do at present. Then, as \o the foreign trade ; the animals iiutil lately were lor the most part fat ; now, however, we have large numbers of dairy cows, as well as a few stores now and again, but the latter do not take the market well, and until a better class of stock can be sent we are not likely to have many o'' tliis sort. Govorunicnt has all ;iloug been doing a good deal at the ports where foreign cattle are lauded to keep down disease. They have a staff of ofHci-ds to inspect the cattle when landed, but tb.at inspection often amounts to very little. It is impossible to say at a glance whether an animal is affected or not. Is it not also possible, very likely probable, that in not a few cases the inspectors may be ou very friendly terms with the importers, and give them too often the benefit of the doubt? This is too often, I understand, the case. 1'he only remedy is slaughter on landing. Butchers some- times make a noiis at the restrictions imposed, but that is only one class of the community, and surely if tlie best beef that goes to London is slaughtered at A.berdeen and sent in carcase, there can be no reason why tlie foreign cattle might not be killed in Lsith and sent to Edinburgh. It is strange, however, that the idea prevails almost amongst every class that such restrictions are entirely for the benefit of the farmer and proprietor, the public never for a moment thinking that if there were no disease amongst cattle, beef would be very much cheaper. Another thing I would like to mention here is the insane practice of holding the store markets ou the same ground and on the same day as fat markets. This ought to be stopped by Government. Perhaps a little more trouble would be caused at first, but that would soon be got over. Then, again, although not immediately connected with the transit of cattle, still quite as important is the question — What is to be done with cattle after they are affected ? It is very hard that a farmer should be compelled to kill his cattle and not be paid a considerable proportion of their value, and yet stamping out in the case of pleuro or rinder- pest seems to be the only means to get clear of it. Were Govern- ment to come forward and offer, say, three-fourths the value of the animals, farmers, as a rule, would give information at once — otherwise, many would take the chance of running the blockade, and disposing of many of their animals as possible rather than give information of their having disease about their place. I understand that at present Government has several agents scouring the country gathering all the information they can as to the cattle trade and traffic, and it is only by hints from practical men that any good will arise from it. They are anxious to get information, and I think that it is only the duty of farmers to express their several opinions, however crude they may be. Mr. Smith Stevenson (Mains) thought'this subject of the very greatest importance, not only to the farmers but to the community at large. The prevention of the spread of disease amongst cattle must interest the whole nation. Not very long ago a number of butchers in London and other large English towns waited, if he was not mistaken, on the Government, or petitionel for the admission of foreign animals into this country without almost any restrictions. He believed those gentlemen were ac- tuated by a desire to have cheap meat. He could not forget that the agricultural interest and the interest of the whole community were the same on this subject, although it seemed very difficult for the latter to think so. He held that they were the same for this reason, that if foreign cattle were ad- mitted freely and unrestrictedly it might cheapen meat for a time, but he had no doubt it would tend to raise it in the long run, for if they brought in disease into this country and spread it among the cattle the tendency would be to raise the price of meat rather than otherwise. He thought the public were quite entitled to do what in them lay to have a good supply of meat at the cheapest price. It was for the agricultural interest to endeavour to produce as much as possible. The farmer would be better producing a larger (juantity even at a lower price, than raising a small supply for a high price. And this was certainly the consumer's interest also. He quite agreed with Mr. Paton in regard to the restrictions on foreign cattle. The rules and regu- lations for the transit of cattle by rail in this country were pretty good, but unfortunately they were very seldom enforced. The cleansing and disinfecting of railway trucks was carried out perhaps at the largest stations, but at many of the smaller stations it was very seldom done. In re- gard to the importation of foreign fat cattle, he was of opinion that they should be slaughtered at tlie port of debarkation, and that store animals coming from abroad should be put in quarantine. It was of special interest to the Scotch farmer to have a cheap and good supply of store cattle, because he believed for one farmer that bred his owu stores iu Scotland three or four had to buy feeding beasts, but he did not think tiiere would be any great hardship, and ccrtaiuly there would be advantage to the public to have all fat cattle slaughtered at the port oi lauding. The carcases could then be sent safely over the country, and no risk would he run of spreading the disease among the livestock. He was clearly of opinion that there should be separate markets or fairs for fat stock and store animals. The amalgamation of the fat and the store markets just now was the means of spreading a good deal of the disease in the country. It was a great mistake to throw condemned carcases into the sea. They should be sent to the chemical manure works, where they would be disinfected thoroughly and made into manure instead of being washed along their shores. -Mr. Wyllie Bolton : Will an animal drowned in salt water infect anything P jMr. Smith : Well, I would not like to risk it. Mr. DuKiE (Barneymains) thought the proper thing would be for the Government to ascertain what diseases were really infectious. For instance, he scarcely thought that pleuro THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 407 was iuffictious (several voices, "Oh! oh!"). Mr. Durie repeated that he did not ihink it was infectious, and there certainly was nothing said to convince liini that it was. It spread, to be sure, but in his experience only among the animals that were submitted to the same atmospheric influ- encies as those first affected. jMurrain and sheep-scab were infec- tious. Scab was brought on by over-heating andover-drivingthe flocks to or from the market, and unless there could be some more restrictions on the mode of driving, which he was afraid was impossible, he did not see any eflectual way out of the difficulties, so far assheed-scab was concerned. The best pre- ventive he knew of for pleuro was to get cattle' conveyed by tlie steamers well protected from cold and wet on board, lie was afraid that would jbe rather expensive lor the importers, but he saw no other way of lessening the spread of pleuro than avoiding the alternate heats and colds in transit. If cattle got infected with foot-and-mouth disease, t'le best tiling to do was to avoid driving them. Exertion irritated the disease greatly, and it would be much sooner got ovsr if the aniraiils were allowed to rest whenever it was observed. Mr. Harvey (Whittinghame Mains) alluded to the various modes in which the different local authorities tliroughout the country carried out the provisions in the Privy Council orders. They had, he said, the Local Authorities of East Lothian, Roxburgh, Selkirk, Mid-Lothian, and others all working more or less differently. Whatever regulations were made should be enforced, so that in the working one county should be consonant with another. As regards the importation of cattle from Ireland, he thought there should be a special staff of inspectors appointed to examine the stock on the steamers and at ports. He did not think that those local veterinary ^inspectors in different parts of the country were sufficient, for they all knew there was such a thing as " tip" in this country. If something like uniformity of action in the various counties were rendered imperative many of the present practical difficulties would be got over. They should have some highly qualified man or men, responsible to Govern- ment, appointed for the purpose of visiting such ports as Hull, Leith, and Yarmouth, and going over the country seeing that those local inspectors did their duty. Then as to scab in sheep, it might be materially lesseuedif they had uniformity of action, instead of every local board working out as at present its own small problems. Mr. SuiRREFF (Saltcoats) thought it was the duty of every practical man to give his experience to aid the scientific on such an important subject as this. It was admitted on all hands that stock were very apt to contract disease in transit^ and the question was how to check or prevent the disease. Some years ago, when in England, he bought a lot of superior pigs in Wiltshire, and took them to East Lolhian. They were taken down by steamer ; they had a good voyage, got safely to their destination, and did so well in the county that some friends requested him to get more of them. Accordiugly he obtained other two " litters" from the same party and place. They had a stormy voyage, but arrived seemingly all right. But in the course of a week or so the second arrival of pigs not only took disease aud died, hut infected all the other pigs which had come in contact with them. They had a perfectly clean bill of health when they started, and he had not the slightest doubt disease had been caught on the voyage. The cause of such an outbreak, as he had meutioned, was a highly scientific question. Instead of putting store animals into quarantine, and keeping them there for some weeks, where, exposed as they might be, disease might be brought on, he would have them taken at once home to warm, com.fortable quarters. Mr. Robertson (New Mains) said nobody could deny that there were great grievances aud risks connected with the pre- sent system of stock transit. It was of great importance that every endeavour should be made to travel tiie stock with as much comfort as possible. When tlie animals were exhausted in transit, they were much more liable to contract disease. Stock in transit should be dealt with in a very different manner from what they were at present. He complained strongly of the shameful usage the dumb animals underwent at markets and fairs from those individuals — he could s(-arcely call them men — who equipped themselves with sharp-pointed sticks and rods. He thought local authorities should take cognisance of the usage the animals sufitained at the hands of drovers, &c. They were all aware that this country could not be supplied without importations. It would be a great boon if Government would make some such regulations as would ensure the safer and speedier transit of animals from Ireland. Ihc Government should have vessels specially con- structed for the Irish cattle traffic. lie was sure tliat two such vessels would cope with the whole trade. The vessels should be built aud fitted up in such a manner that there would be no danger to stock on the voyage. With such a short passage, he did not see that it should he diflicult for the Government to make provision for the shipping of cattle from Ireland to this country in perfect safety. The present mode of conveying stock by rail in this country was also in many respects unsatisfactory. He had known of cattle being twenty hours iu trucks, in thnir own district, accomplishing a journey of as many miles. That was .simply ridiculous. It was too bad that the railway companies siiould have it in their power to deal thus recklessly with the valuable stock of the farmer, representing a great deal of money. The railway people turned out the cattle alive, so that the farmer had no hold of them; but the beasts were often constitutionally in- jured, and did not thrive. That meant a great loss to the farmer. These were matters which should be impressed on the Government. With reference to the foreign cattle trade, he coincided with much that had been already well said. Their experience was that the more dangerous epidemics that swept across the country came from abroad. He would have all fat stock from foreign countries slaughtered at the port of debarkation. The carcases could be sent to the market as well dead as alive, and with much more safety to the country. In reference to the importation of store cattle, certain spots at ports could be marked out, with a eordon throvsn around, and the animals kept there until they were perfectly purified. Mr. Charles Smith (Whittinghame) proposed the fol- lowing resolution, which was seconded by Mr. Robertson (New Mains), and unanimously agreed to : " Tliat this club, recognising the importance of Imperial measures for prevent- ing the spread of infectious disease among cattle and sheep, approve of the Privy Council continuing and extending their regulations throughout tlie country, and agree that Lord Elcho should be respectfully requested to forward to the Duke of Richmond a copy of this resolution, pressing the subject on his attention." SHEEP SCAB.— At the Police Court, Sherborne, Mr. J. Day, of Lillesdou Court, was summoned for having in his pos.session certain sheep affected with a contagious disease, and neglecting to give notice to a police-constable with all practicable speed, cout rary to an order in Council. Evidence was given by Mr. J. Gibbs, one of tiie veterinary inspectors appointed by the Court of Quarter Session, to show that the m;!Jor part of defendant's tiock of 000 sheep were very badly affected with scab, and that the outbreak must have been of some months' standing. Ten of the sheep had been minutely examined, and found to be suffering iu an advanced stage of tlie disease, and the Bench convietej for tiiose ten, mitigating the penalty from £50 to £30, including costs. The proceed- ings were instituted by Superintendent Goldsmith, inspector under the Act, and it was proved that defendant allowed the sheep to mingle aud ts stray on the highv\'ay. POTATO PROFESSORS.— As for the fertility jf the Aiucy in discovering explanations of potato-disease, it is really a matter demanding the instant attention of psychologists, for it is evidence of wide-spread stupidity or insanity or vanity, or something equally dreadful, that should be cured by the Social Science Congress. The past season has been characterised by continuous sunshine, and potato-disease was unheard of until the sunshine failed, and then the crops still in the ground became more or less diseased. There is no mystery about the potato- disease : it is a question of sunshine from firs^t to last, and if Mr. Torbitt is resolved to eradicate it, he must go to the sun and abolish his spots, and make such other arrangements as shall ensure to this globe uniform and favourable cosmical influences. A wet cold summer makes potato-disease, a hot dry summer makes a healthy crop of potatoes. The facts are patent, and yet there is a crowd of clamorous people always ready with some nonsensical and injurious fancy to explain the cause and cure of the murrain that decimates the noble root. — The Gardener's Magaxine. 408 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. liABOURERS' UNIONS IN THE WEST. Sir T. D. Acland has placed a room at Broadclyst at the disposal of those who are organising Union meetings, and at the same time addressed the following letter to Mr. S. Mitchell : Holnicote, Oct. 10, 1874. Sir, — I thank you for your courteous letter, and for sending rae your list of the necessary weekly expenses of a Somerset- shire farm labourer, which you estimate at 21s., and also your notice to the farm labourers of the large meetings to be held in their favour in the West of England, and to be fol- lowed by collections for the support of the local delegates. I willingly believe that you are not acting from any selfish motive, and that you desire to awaken sympathy for a class from which 1 gather that you have risen yourself by hard striving. I am not aware of the reasons which have led to the selection of Broadclyst as the only agricultural village in Devonshire at whicii a meeting is to be held. You will find in that parisii owners and occupiers of land of every grade, .some of whose families have risen by honourable efforts like your own, and about 300 labourers, most of whom have good gardens with their cottages, and allotments besides. Some few are keeping cows or dairies — the first upward step on the ladder. I wish there were more. The money rate of weekly wages, as compared with that of some other parts of England, is affected by two circumstances — 1, the hours of daywork are shorter; 2, the majority of the labourers persist in demiindincr nearly one-sixth of their earnings in the form of liquor for themselves instead of money for tiie whole family. Some men receive los. per week in money regularly ; others earn on an average 16s. or 17s. for piece-work. I think it unreasonable to set in contrast with these wages a rate of money payment equal to, if not higher than, that paid iu towns to labourers who have no gardens and no cheap fuel, and who jiay much higher rents for inferior house accommodation. Two carters (one unmarried) left Broadclyst last spring for wages at 24s. in Wales. They found it did not answer, and came hack after a few weeks' trial. You do me the justice to believe that I desire to discover what is the best way to get our labourers belter fed and better housed. I am well aware that there is great need for improvement — more, liowever, in some ]ilaces than in others. I will say nothing of the progress w hich has been sroing on for the last half-century ; of the amount of money, time, and attention which many land- owners and their agents are devoting to these questions. Nor will I dwell on the difficulties more or less connected with the rapid growth of wealth in trade, the rise in prices in building, the need of more capital for the improvement of land, the narrow margin of profit, the increase of popu- lation, the deficiency, or more often the neglect, of the means of education, the working of the Poor-law and of the laws affecting the tenure of land. The influence of each of these circumstances on the condition of the labourer should neither be overlooked nor exaggerated. They sug- gest matter for reflection and patient effort, not for sluggish acquiescence in the things as they are nor for delusive expec- tation of sudden changes for the better. But I must say that I think it unjust that one class — namely, the practical farmers •^should be singled out, as they have been by the advocates of the Labourers' Union, for obloquy on account of evils beyond their control, or because I hey do not offer wages in excess of tlie demand, and beyond the market value of the work done. Nor do I think that torch-light meetings, stimulated by hand- bills such as you sent me a specimen of, at the head of which are representations of labourers as ghastly skeletons, and caricatures of well-fed farmers, will be favourable to the de- tailed discussion of the means of improvement to which you invite me. Still if you and those with whom you are acting believe that public meetings will arouse the labourers to com- bined exertion for their own good, and persuade them to cultivate self-reliance, providence, and temperance, objects for which 1 am glad to welcome the support of the Union, or if you hope to hasten the progressive reform of laws unfavourable to the condition of the labourer, as far as I am concerned you shall have every facility for making your appeal without hindrance. 1 have great confidence in the good sense of my neiglibours, and in the mutual good feeling of masters and men. I believe they will listen to what you have to say and form a reasonable estimate of the value of your statements. Whether the Union will make more rapid progress in Broadclyst or in Devonshire than it has liitherto made, remains to be seen ; at any rate it has not been stimulated by organised opposition. I am, sir, yours faithfully, T. D. ACLAJJD. Mt. G, Mitchell, " One from the Plough." NORTHAMPTON TO W I T. TO THE EDITOR OF THE NORTHAMPTON HERALD. Appeal if yon will, You're sold if you do ; Its settled and fixed Without asking you. Sir, — Such was the tone and spirit of a mandate whicli,dated September 15, 1874, issued shortly afterwards from the office of the Clerk of the Peace for the county of Northampton. It was addressed by " The "Committee of Justices appointed to revise the basis of the rate now in force for this county" to " The overseers of the poor" of each parish. No Russian ukase was ever more arbitrary ; no Delphian oracle ever more (jljseure. This circular merely informed the overseers that the com- mittee had, "after due inquiry and investigation by them, thought fit to alter such basis, and they propose to alter your rate, by increasing (or ' decreasing,' as the case migiil be, liiit much, most generally the former) the same from £ f..£ In the case of this parish it was an increase of £331 — namely, " from £2,926 to £3,257." We cannot understand the cause of this increase. Tuesday, the 29th of Sept., was named as the day of appeal, and it was requested that a previous notice of the intention to appeal might be given. Fourteen days only were allowed for the clerk to issue the notice, for the overseers to receive it, for them to call the rate- payers together in vestry, for the rate-payers to deliberate and determine, for previous notice of appeal to be given, and for the representative of the parish to attend the meeting of the committee, and object to the rate. Not only was no information given with regard to any de- tails or reasons for the proposed increase, but the basis itself of the proposed rate was studiously concealed. It was only after a further portion of this miserable modicum of 14 days had been consumed in writing to the Clerk of the Peace to inquire, that the ratepayers of Hellidon ascertained that the basis taken was the Income-tax Returns: on every other point they remained as ignorant as before. It was evident that the ratepayers of Northamptonshire had been purposely pinned into a corner, that they were the victims of a foregone con- clusion, and that the ex post f ptiuy has Branches. The Officers of the Bank are bound not to disclose the transactions of any of its Customws. By Order of the Directors, WM. MoKEWAN, *) Joint Genaral WHITBREAD TOMSON, i Manage™. No. 6, Vol. XLVL] DECEMBER, 1874. [Third Series. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE, AND MONTHLT JOURNAL ov THE AGEICULTUEAL INTEEEST. TO 7^^ FARMERS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM. LONDON : PUBLISHED BY ROGERSON AND TUXFORD, 265, STRAND. PRICK TWO SHILLINGS. WATSON AND HAZBLL,] [PRIKTBRS. 266,STRAND THE FAEMEE'S MAGAZIJ^E. CONTENTS DECEMBER, 1874. Platb. — A PRIZE LEICESTER. Description of Plate . . . . The Opening of the Winter Session . BoYAL Agricultural Society op England The Farmers' Club : Our Villages — Their Sanitary Reform The SiiiTHFiBLD Club . . The Royal Agricultukal Benevolent Institution The Shorthorn Herd-Book and Society Highland and Agricultural Society of Scotland Manures ...... The Sewage of Towns, Villages, and Country Houses. — By Mb. J Denton, C.E. . . . . . The Price of Wheat ..... Night Soil ...... Boroughbridge Agricultural Society : Farm Buildings Hexham Farmers' Club: Farm Buildings The Scottish and English Chambers of Agriculture . The Central Chamber of Agriculture. The Scottish Chamber of Agriculture Tenants' Improvements .... Irish Tknant-Right ..... " Mr Thompson, of Kirby Hall" Maidstone Farmers' Club: Indigestion in the Horse Gloucester Root Show .... Carmarthenshire Farmers' Club: Manures Conference of Poor-Law Guardians in the West Bath and West of England Society and Southern Counties Association A Show at Holkham . The Royal Agricultural Society of Ireland The Tiptree Letters . Contagious Diseases (Animals) Act The Assessment of Mines A Satisfied Farmer The Agriculture of Algeria . County Business and County Boards . The Maintenance of Highways Stcck Sales .... The Law of Distraint for Rent Barley or Wheat- Malt The Manchester and Salford Fat Stock Show Land Tenure .... Mr. Sewell Read's Budget The Rabbit in Devon. Mr. Hope's Sewage Farm Staindrop Farmers' Club Laying Down Land to Pasture Morayshire Farmers' Club Review of the Cattle Trade During the Past Month . Review of the Corn Trade during the Past Month . Bailey Page. . 425 . 425 . 426 . 430 . 438 . 438 . 439 . 439 441 447 449 450 452 455 458 458 464 468 469 470 473 475 476 479 480 481 481 482 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 494 495 496 497 500 501 502 50S THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. DECEMBER, 1874. PLATE. PRIZE LEICESTER The Property of Mr. T, H. Hutchinson, of Manor House, Catterick. This ram, now a two-shear, bred by !Mr. Hutchin- son, and known as Prince Charlie, is by Borton's Blair Athol, a Royal and All-Yorkshire first-prize sheep, out of a ewe from the Barton flock, also by a Royal ram. In 1873, as a shearling. Prince Charlie took first prizes at the following shows : Doncaster, Ripon, Driffield, Crook, Thirsk, The Highland Society, Royal Noith Lancashire (Chorley), Keighley, Dui-ham County, Richmondshire, Manchester and Liverpool (Chester), Northallerton, Barnard Castle, and Wetherby. In 1874 he was second at Doncaster, and first at Ripon, Malton, DrifBelJ, Bishop Auckland, Durham County, Manchester and Liverpool (Staley bridge), Northallerton, Wetherby, and first at the Yorkshire Show at Sheffield, beating, amongst others, the second and third Royal sheep, tlius making a total of 23 first prizes. Last season this ram was used at homo, although many tempting offers had been refused for his hire. This year he has becUj with two others, let to Mr. James Hall, of Scorbro, master of the Ilokleruess hounds. one of the best judges of a Leicester in Eug* land and the largest ram-breeder in Yorkshire. Prince Charlie has brought his owner upwards of £220 in prizes, exclusive of his services in 1873. His half- brother was sold last year with another shearling to the Hon, C. Sladen, Green Vale, Victoria, for 200 gs. ; while his dam has bred sheep which have made upwards of £500 in prizes and letting. Mr. Hutchinson's Lei- cesters have become great favourites with foreigners, and of late years many have been shipped to Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Holland, Belgium, France, a-.d Germany. Daring the last two years sheep from the Manor House flock have gained upwards of 100 prizes, and won £443 13s. in the principal show-yards of England. At Bedford we spoke of the Catterick ewes as a very neat, uniform lot, symmetrical in their frames and of good thoroughbred character; while Prince Charlie is quite a prize sheep, what with his blood-like head, thick neck, wide loins, long hind-quarters, capital thighs, and bold carriage, backed by a heavy fleece of fine quality. THE OPENING OF THE WINTER SESSION IN LONDON. Rarely in the memory of man has there been so delight- ful or, at the same time, so dreary an autumn. The agri- cultural labourer has much to answer for, as he has over- laid alike rural gatherings and learned disquisitions ; and if ever a topic were talked out, it has been his " condition." At the Farmers' Club, indeed, on the Monday evening Mr. James Howard fairly apologised for once more bringing such a thing forward. Had he foreseen how, morning after morning, special commissioners would have been giving " graphic accounts of village life," Mr. Howard himself might have shrunk from the subject. But the Club lecturer might have gone yet further when speaking to the way in which he had been anticipated. The land- lords and county members have pretty generally taken refuge here ; merely glancing at other agricultural ques- tions, they have grown eloquent over the labour difficulty, as they counselled mutual concessions between master and servant. The squire, however, has found that it would not do to stop short at this point, but has commonly gone on to admit his share in the adjustment, and to speak to the necessity for more care being given to cottage accom- modation and home comforts. In a word, the sanitary reform of our villages come as well-timed as many of the subjects at The Farmers' Club frequently fall, and the discussion cannot but do good, the more especially perhaps Oi.D Series.] throuarh the examples cited from Bedfordshire, Bucking- hamshire, and Oxfordshire. Landowners will learn to show not merely their stables, their kennels and their homesteads, but their cottages; as, on the other hand, the labourer will himself be required to look a little more care- fully to his own condition. There is no doubt but country folks have something like an indifferene to the enjoyment of such blessings as fresh water and pure air ; and the tenour of the discussion on Monday went to show that the villager himself was but too often an obstacle to the sanitary reform of Our Village, as dear Miss Mitford wrote it long before the dawn of Mr. Howard. Coming from the quarter it did, all the main features were sketched in the opening paper ; but the debate threatened to get wild at the very outset, as with Mr. Hope the very mention of sewage — That well-known name awakens all his woes. And it was only a thoroughly practical speech from Mr. Treadwell that diverted the discourse again into its proper channel. We give a full report " upon authority," the day's proceedings being pointed by a very popular appointment — that of Dr. Voelcker to the Chairmanship of the Club for 1875, upon which we shall ask our contemporary, Tlie E E Vol. LXXVI,— No. 6, 426 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. AgriciiUural Gaxetfe, to say more : " The London rariners' Club have elected Dr. Augustus Voelcker, F.R.S., as their President for the coming year. Proving both life and vigour by stepping thus boldly out of the tield from which their selections have hitherto been made, they have done honour both to themselves and to the scientific side of agriculture by a choice which will certainly bring iuto prominence, during their ensuing session, the importance of the agricultural aids which are offered by the student of science." In fact, the Committee may be congratulated on cari'ying out the motto of a kindred society, and strengthening the union between Sciexck and Practice. At the meeting of the Council of this said Society in Hanover-square on Wednesday, a very strong feeling was expressed as to the desirability of breaking through the bonds of the charter, which, as Air. Holland, the ex- president, well said, "was more than a quarter of a cen- tury old, and since it was granted times and feelings had changed." Lord Lichfield, however, as the moving spirit, broached a resolution which should " bring members of the Council into more frequent communication with mem- bers of the Society," and permit the discussion of " mea- sures of a practical agricultural nature, although pending or to be brought forward in either of the Houses of Par- liament." And as all this was carried unanimously the shades of Colonel Challoner and Mr. llaymond Barker will surely shudder ai such astounding revolutions. Then, Lord Cathcart went so far as to characterise the general meetings as " shams" — as shams they will continue to be if the proceedings are not considered worth reporting, an omission which we have already dwelt on in our notice of the new number of the Society's Journal. However, the demonstration at Bedford has already been attended with other good effects, as a large proportion of the judges for the next Smithfield Club show, as appointed during the week, are new men. " Times," as Mr. Holland has it, " have changed" here also since they rang the changes of Steward and Judge, and Judge and Steward over each others' heads. " The consideration of reform in Local Government will continue to demand the care and investigation of the Local Taxation Committee. The irregularity of ex- isting divisions, the coufusion of jurisdiction, and the multiplication of authorities are all evils for which a remedy is urgently demanded. A proper classification of local and imperial duties should, in their opinion, be followed by careful inquiry as to the areas, constitution, and duties of the local governing bodies, so as to ensure not only efficient representation to the local taxpayer. but wise and economic administration. Tlie promises of the Chancellor of the Exchequer with reference to the possibility of nUimately handing over to locd authorities some branch of the general revenue will have to be stead- fastly kept ill view." So says the annual report of the Local Taxation Committee of the Ceulral Chamber of Agriculture, as just issued ; and if this bo really intended to mean anything, it must mean a movement for the establishment of County Boards, already foreshadowed by jNfr. Sewell Read. Accordingly, at the meeting of the Chamber, on Tuesday, the very mention of County Boards, so far as we can see, was carefully avoided ; while the Council appeared to be quite at sea as to any other system of administration. Thus, the Business Committee in their No. 6 resolution proposed that all roads should be " under the management of Highway Boards," but these words were omitted when the resolution was put before the full meeting, and, ou being replaced through an araendraeut, were again struck out by 14 to 13. The divisions, in truth, were close and continual, as the report, which we give with something of an apology for so doing, will show. This, however, can convey no proper notion of the hope- less muddle and utter confusion of the proceedings ; as a contemporary, who perhaps with more discretion cut it down, says, " to every resolution nearly every person spoke twice, and several three and four times. The reso- lutions were in no case put until the entire patience of the meeting was gone, and the room resounded with cries oi Divide— for pit fs sake, clivifh'." We' prefer to quote thus much, as our own opinion of the administrative ability displayed by the Council of the Central Chamber of Agriculture has long been known. Such agricultural exhibitions are happily not common. As we intimated some months since, the Shorthorn Committee has been unable to come to terms for the pur- chase of The Herd Book from iMr. Strafford, who insisted on appointing his successor as editor, although the person named by him declined to act on such nomination. It is still satisfactory to see that the establishment of the Shorthorn Society, an institution much needed, will be proceeded with. There is only further to notice in the business of the past week the lecture delivered through its new chairman by the Council to the subscribers to the Royal Agricultural Benevolent Institi»tion. It would appear to be considered very improper to take any notice of any merely general complaints, whereas we should have thought it the duty of the direction to ascertain, for its own sake, how much or how little com- plaint was warranted. ROYAL AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY OF ENGLAND. MoNTFitY Council, Wednesday, Nov. 4, 1874. — Present : Viscount Bridport, president, in the chair, the Duke of Bedford, Earl Cathcart, the Earl of Lichfield, Lord Chesham, Lord Kesteven, Lord Tredegar, the Hon. W. Egerton, M.P., Sir Massey Lopes, Bart., M.P, Sir A. K. Macdonald, Bart., Mr. Barnett, Mr. Booth, Mr. Bowly, Mr. Cantrell, Mr. Dent, Mr. Druce, Mr. Edmonds, Mr. Brandreth Gibbs, Mr. Hemsley, Mr. T. Horley, jun., Mr. Holland, Mr. Hornsby, Col. Kingscote, M.P., Mr. Bowen Jones, Col. Loyd Lindsay, M. P., Mr. Mcintosh, Mr. Masfen, Mr. Mil ward, Mr. Ransome, Mr. Ridley. M.P., Mr. Rigdcu, Mr. Sanday, Mr. G. Turner, Mr. Jabez Turner, Mr. Wakefield, Mr. Welby, M.P., Mr. Wells, Mr. Jacob Wilson, Mr, Whitehead, and Dr. Voelcker. The following new members were elected: Adams, George, Tidwcll Farm, Faringdon. Barwell, Tliomas, Spalding Common, liucoln. Best, Captain John Charles, Plas-yn-Vivod, LlangoUen. Brown, George Fowler, Newton, Desford, Leicester. Burr:i, William, Pomfret, Ashford, Kent. Callau, I'liilip, Dowdstown, Ardee, Louth, Ireland. Cummins, Edward Russell, Enfield, Middlesex. Elkins, William, Elliington, Yelvertoft, Rugby. Gartside, William, Smethcott, Wroxeter, Shrewsbury. Gibbons, George, Tunley Farm, Bath. Griffith, Charles Marshall, LlwTudurio, Llandyssil, South Wales. Horner, George Wood, Athelhampton Hall, Dorchester. Hosegood, Obed, Deliington, lliminster. Ingham, John, Marr, Doncaster. James, James, Les Vauxbelets, Guernsey. Keane, Richard F., Derriheen, Cappoquin, Co., Waterford. Kennard, Rev. R. B., Marnhull, Blaudford. Langham, Herbert Hay, Cottesbrooke Park, Northampton, Lyon, William, Arlington Manor, Newbury, Berks. Morgan, Charles Elliot, Flatts House, Bishop Auckland. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 427 riiillips, \Tliomas Henry, Broolsluuds Farm, Perry Barr, Staffs. Reynolds, AVilliani Smith, Spalding Common, Lincoln. Robinson, William V\''alker, Sonthfield Honse, Sedgpfield, Ferryhill. Smith, Henry, jun., The Grove, Cropwell Butler, Bingham. Starkie, Major L. N., Huutroyde, Burnley, Lancashire. Stephenson, Robert, Brierton, Greatham, Durham. Whee'er, Rowland, Steephill Farm, Ventnor, Isle of Wight. Young, Captain F., The Terrace, Ryde, Isle of Wight. Fii\ANCES. — Colonel Kingscote, M.P., presented the report, from which it appeared that the Secretary's re- ceipts during the past three months had been duly exa- mined by the committee, and by Messrs. Quiltcr, Ball, and Co., the society's accountants, and found correct. The balance in the hands of the bankers on Oct. 31, was £622 Gs. lOd. The quarterly statement of subscriptions and arrears to Sept. 30, and the quarterly cash account, were laid on the table. The arrc;irs then amounted to £1,372. The Committee recommended that the Secretary be instructed to take the necessary steps to sell out of the funded property of the Society, the sum of £3,000, to meet the excess of expeaditureover receipts at the Bedford meeting. The Committee directed the attention of the Council to the constantly increasing expenditure in connection with the country meetings. At present the expenditure on show-yard plant exceeds £6,000 per annum; that on trials of implements exceeds £2,000; the stock prizes and ex- penses of judges, forage, and other matters connected with the exhibition of stock, costs £5,000 per anaum : printing, advertising, and bill-posting exceeds £1,000; while sundry matters bring the total to over .£15,000. The Committee, tkerefore, suggested that the attention of the stock prizes, the implement, and the show-yai'd contract committees be specially drawn to this subject. The ordinary receipts of the society have of late ex- ceeded the expenditure by about £1,000 per annum, but the recent increase in the grants for education, potato in- vestigations, and farm prize competitions, have now deprived the society of this aid towards supplying the deficiency in the show-yard receipts ; it is, therefore, more than ever necessary that the expenses of the coun- try meetings should be reduced, if possible. With reference to the suggestion proposed by this Committee in August last, that local agents should be ap- pointed throughout the country, for the purpose of in- creasing the number of members of the society, the com- mittee recommended that the secretary be instructed to communicate with each member of council requesting nominations of suitable persons in their several counties. Mr. Milward regarded the final paragraph of this report as derogatory to the society, and moved that it be can- celled, and jNIr. Masfeu seconded this proposition, which was supported by Mr. Jacob Wilson and Mr. Dent Dent, who hoped that the expenditure of the society on the country meetings would be reduced, but not that on ex- periments, education, or farm prizes. Lord Cathcart having asked a question as to the cost of the new dyna- mometer, which was replied to by Mr. Booth and Mr. Brandreth Gibbs, the paragraph in question was expunged, and the remainder of the report adopted. General Tauntox. — Lord Kesteven reported that Mr. J. S. Bult had been appointed steward of forage for the Taunton meeting, and had accepted the appointment. The Committee had consulted the members of the Taunton local committee, who were of opinion that Exmoor and Dartmoor sheep should be shorn before exhibition, and not shown in their wool as at Plymouth ; the Committee recommended that this opinion be acted upon, and that copies of the proof of the stock prize sheet be sent to the local committee when printed. They also recom- mended that Mr. G. Turner and Mr. J. Hemsley be added to the Committee. This report was adopted. Stock Phizes. — Mr. IMilward (chairman) reported that the Committee recommended several alterations iu ihe Bedford prize sheet for adoption by the Council for the Taunton meeting, and that the proposed new prize sheet be printed and taken into consideration in Decem- ber. This report was adopted after a conversation, in the course of which Mr. Dent suggested the omission of prizes for Suffolk horses and hunters over four years old; Mr. Wells, the omission of the Clydesdale classes, Lord Cathcart the fixing of a superior limit of six years at the age for hunters ; and Mr. Masfen, that the local com- mittee might take up some of the classes. Mr. Wakefield gave notice that at the December meet- ing he would move that no prizes be given for hunters over six years old. Repobt of Journal Committee. — Mr. J. Dent Dent (chairman) reported that the committee, in placing upon the table the autumn number of the Journal, re- gretted the delay iu its publication, which had been caused by the heavy work falling upon the reporter of the implement trials. No less than 370 implements, iu 33 classes, iu addition to those entered for the special prizes given for guards for thrashing-machines, had been tried and reported upon. This had also caused a con- siderable increase iu the cost of the Journal, both in i'.rinting and in illustrations. The committee recommended payments amounting to £859 18s. There are 17 entries for farms in the three classes for Somersetshire, as follows : CL.VSS I. — Hill Farms. George Babbage, of Nettlecombe, Taunton. Joseph King, of Norton HautviUe, Bristol. Class II.— Dairy Farms. Cornelius Collins, of Orchard Leigh, Frome. Robert A. Day, of TJbley Finn, Bristol. George Gibbons, of Tunley Farm, Bath. Class III.— Other Farms. Alfred Bowerraan, of Capton Farm, Williton, Taunton. William Bulleu, of Crewkerne. Wm. Thomas Culverwell, of Durlcigh Farm, Bridgwater. John G. Davis, of Blagroves Farm, Milverton, Taunton. Thomas Hembrow, of Stoke St. Gregory, Taunton. Obed Hosegood, of DiUington Farm, lirainster. John R. Keen, of Chewton Mendip, Wells. Thos. M. Lang, of Barrington Court, Ilrainster. James Mead, of Curry Mallett, Taunton. Messrs. Musgrave and Sons, of Pyrlaud, Taunton. Edward Paget, of Burnett, laristol. Thos. P. Waltham, of Spaxton Court Farm, Bridgwater. Mr. Little, of Lanhill, Chippenham ; Mr. Thomas Outhwaite, of Goldboro', Knaresboro' ; and Mr. Bowen Jones, of Ensdon, Shrewsbury, had accepted the office ot judge ; and Mr. Bowen Jones will write the report. The committee trust that the first inspection will take place during the present month. This report was adopted. Members' Suggestion Special Committee. — Mr. M. W. Ridley, M.P. (chairman), reported that the com- mittee had met and considered the various suggestions referred to them. Many of these being of some im- portance they recommended that the suggestions and the decisions hitherto arrived at be printed for circulation among the members of the committee, in order that they may be revised if necessary, and a report presented to the December Council. This report was adopted. Potato Disease.— Mr. C. Whitehead, chairman, presented the following report : The judges appointed to inspect the growth of the six varieties of potatoes which E £ 2 428 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. were eutered for compctitiou as disease-proof, and planted ill trial plots iu twenty ditterent places in England, Scot- land, and Ireland, have reported that none of the varieties have resisted the potato disease. During the period of vigorous growth, in all the varieties, in five out of the twenty localities the disease was virulent, and by the end of the season it was found that in almost all these places more or less disease was apparent ; so that the question of disease-proof potatoes, as far as these trials are concerned, has been practically decided in the first year. The note- books of the growers and the reports of the judges contain much valuable information as to the influence of soil, climate, and various methods of cultivation upon the action and jjrogress of the potato disease. The committee, there- fore, recommend that Mr. Carruthers, who has carefully i:!spected every trial plot, be requested to collate these experiences for publication in the next Journal of the Society. The potatoes which were grown upon the trial plots, after having been carefully examined by the judges, and the per-centages of diseased tubers ascertained, have been seat to the Agricultural Hall. It is proposed that the competitors shall have the first offer to purchase the produce of their own entries, and that if they, or any of them, decline, the potatoes shall be sold by auction or by salesmen, as the committee may determine. It will be remembered that the Council reserved a power to enforce a penalty of £20 in case of the failure of the entries of any competitor to resist the disease, but the committee recommend that this penalty be not enforced in any in- stance. ]Most important communications have been re- ceived from Professor De Bary, who has ascertained, by recent experiments, that the potato disease is not propa- gated by infected tubers ; that although the mycelium of the fungus {.Peronospora infestans) was distinctly ap- parent in the stalks of plants raised directly from diseased tubers, no gonidia or germs were evolved. The Professor remarks upon this curious circumstance that he is struck by this result of seeing the fungus with the naked eye during two or three months in his little field, and all the plants and leaves intact. Professor De Bary, in a later comnnunication, expresses sanguine hopes that he has at last discovered the certain nidi, or resting-places, of the oospores, or active primary germs of the fungus, which, as he says, would essentially accomplish its life history ; and the great practical results of these disco- veries, if perfected, will obviously be that measures may be taken by potato growers to avoid planting potatoes after, or in the immediate vicinity of plants known to be suitable to the development of the oospores of the fungus, or that steps may be taken to destroy them In situ. — This report was adopted. House. — Colonel Kingscote, C.B., M.P., reported that the painting of the inside of the house had been done to the satisfaction of the committee, and that they recom- mended that the Secretary be instructed to procure two new hall lamps at a cost not exceeding £10. This report was adopted. Implement. — Mr. B. T. Brandreth Gibbs reported that the committee recommended that a meeting of the Implement Committee be held on the Tuesday of the Smithfield Club week, and that the judges who adjudi- cated on mowing machines at Manchester be invited to attend, to assist the committee in determining the scale of points and the method of trial. The committee re- commended that the competing towns be requested to provide 50 acres of early-sown rye, for the trials of reap- ng machines iu 1876 ; and that, upon the recommenda - tion of the judges, there be a final trial of the selected machines at the time of wheat harvest. This report was adopted. Selection. — Colonel Kingscote, C.B., M.P. (chair- man), reported the following recommendations of the committee: 1, that the Duke of Bedford be elected a vice-president, in the room of the Earl of Egmont, de- ceased ; 3, that the following new members of Council be elected, in the place of Colonel Kingscote, elected a trustee ; Messrs. J. Wells, of Booth Ferry, and Mr. James Webb, of Fladbury, deceased, viz., the Earl Spen- cer, K.G., of Althorp, Northampton; Mr. J. Martin, of Littleport, Ely ; and Mr. II. Chandos Pole-Gell, of Hop- ton Hall, Wirksworth. This report having been received, it was moved by Colonel Kingscote, seconded by Mr. Mil ward, and carried unanimously, "That the Duke of Bedford be elected a vice-president of the Society." The election of Earl Spencer as a member of the Council was then moved by Colonel Kingscote, seconded by Lord Kesteven, and carried unanimously ; that of Mr. Martin was movsd by Colonel Kingscote, seconded by Mr. Dent Dent, and carried unanimously ; and that of Mr. Pole- Gell was moved by Colonel Kingscote, seconded by Mr. Booth, and also carried unanimously. Education. — The Duke of Bedford (chairman) re- ported that 29 candidates had entered to compete for the Society's elementary scholarships, viz., two from the Bedford Middle-class Public School, and 27 from the Surrey Couuly School at Cranleigh. Also that Mr. Charles Howard, of Biddenham, Bedford, and Mr. J. Bradshaw, of The Knovvle, near Cranleigh, had consented to act as local secretaries. ]\Ir. Bowen Jones having brought the question before the committee whether en- dowed schools, otherwise eligible, should be entitled to send candidates to compete for these scholarships in future years, the committee were of opinion that an endowment is no disqualification. This report was adopted. The committee gave notice that at the December Council they would apply for a renewal of the Education Grant for 1875. Siiowi'ARD Contracts. — Mr. B. T. Brandketh Gibbs reported that the surveyor's report had been re- ceived, showing a balance due to Mr. Penny (after de- ducting the 5 per cent, discount stipulated in his contract) to be £331. The gross cost of the showyard, grand stand, and other works, amounted to £6,055 14 7 Being an excess over Hull, 1873, of £249 3 8 And over Cardiff, 1872, of 397 8 7 The surveyor reports that the levelling and preparation of the showyard at Taunton has been placed by the Taunton committee in the hands of Mr. Penny. The preliminary plan for the Taunton showyard was laid before the committee, and it was resolved that the same be re- duced so as not to exceed the preliminary plan of the Cardifi' meeting, and be subject to such alterations as may be found necessary hereafter. The surveyor handed in the agreement between the secretary and the contractor for the repairs to be done (as already ordered) to the per- manent buildings, and the committee recommended that the secretary be authorised to sign the same. This report was adopted. The president reported the resignation of Viscount Hill, a vice-president of the Society. The Earl of Lichfield then brought forward the reso- lution, of which notice on his behalf had been given by Mr. Holland, as follows : " That a committee be appointed to take into consideration the Society's charter, and to suggest what alterations, if any, are advisable to be made therein, for the purpose of bringing members of Council into more frequent communication with members of the Society, and also for permitting the discussion iu Council of measures of a practical agricultural nature, although pending or to be brought forward in either of the Houses of Parliament." He wished at once to disclaim any sug- gestion that he or any other member of Council who had moved in this matter felt any dissatisfaction with the pre- sent management of the Society. His chief object was to THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 429 popularise the Society with its own members aud with the public , as there was a general impression abroad that the members have no voice iu the management of the Society's affairs. He also wished to remove the prohibition upon the Council to dis- cuss matters pending or to be brought forward before either House of Parliament, as he considered that this pi-o- hibition impaired the usefulness and efficiency of the So- ciety. With regard to his first object, he looked upon the prevalent opinion of the members as well-fouuded, and he referred to the ordinary course of proceedings at the general meetings, and the stringenjt rule in the Charter (section 9), as showing that the sole management of the Society was vested in the Council, without any control on the part of the members, as is usual in other societies. The function of the members was limited to the making of suggestions at the invitation of the chairman, and to their comments in their individual capacity. It was no doubt true that mem- bers could express their sense of mismanagement by the Council, by declining to re-elect any of the trustees or vice-presidents, and any of the twenty-five members of Council who annually retire by rotation, and are eligible for re-election ; but the Charter fixes the day for the trausactiou of such business so inconveniently, that the members have uot a fair and full opportunity of bringing their opinions before the Council, even on that occasion. He considered that these questions alone furnished ample grounds for asking for a committee to consider the question of au alteration of the Charter. On the question of the prohibition of certain subjects from their discussions, he averred that nobody felt more strongly than himself the importance of excluding party politics from them ; but he held that to be a very ditTereut matter from the childish law that the Council were not to discuss a given subject simply and solely because it already was before Parliament, or was about to be brought before either House of the Legislature. The progressive legisla- tion of the present day often rendered it very desirable that the Government should obtain the opinion of the Council on practical questions ; but their charter pre- vented them from discussing such questions as cattle diseases, except during the Parliamentary recess. It had also, some time ago, prevented their giving the Govern- ment any information as to the value of malt as food for stock ; and although good roads were as useful to the farmer as good machinery, the Council could not take up any aspect of such a question. He confessed, however, that this matter alone would not have induced him to ask for a committee to consider a revision of the charter, and he thought that if it were granted they would require a very stringent bye-law to prevent the introduction of a question of party politics upon any pretence or in any guise whatever. lie had heard with regret that it was found desirable to curtail their expenditure, for he held rather that the Society should increase its income. The number of subscribers was small in comparison ivith the extensive privileges which members enjoyed for a small subscription, greater, he believed, than that offered by any other society in the world ; and therefore he could not help thinking that the small number of members pointed to a defect in the constitution of the Society. He be- lieved that defect chiefly to be that members had not that share in the management of the Society that subscribers to all institutions naturally looked for. He, therefore, moved for the appointment of a committee in the terms of his notice. Mr. Holland seconded the motion. He had brought forward the notice in Lord Lichlield's name, as his lord- ship was out of England at the time, and had on a previous occasion brought forward a similar resolution. He be- lieved that by a judicious alteration of ^the Charter they would gain subscribers, without altering the character of the institution. He thought that they should alter the date of the general meeting when the members of Council were to be elected, and that the members of the Society should have an opportunity of knowing beforehand what was proposed to be done. The Charter was now more than a quarter of a century old, and since it was granted times and feelings had changed. He, therefore, thought that the Charter should be amended to suit the circum- stances of the present day, but that at the same time they should be careful not to admit party politic3 into their discussions. Earl Cathcart, in supporting the motion, expressed the pleasure that he had felt in discharging the duties of president during his term of office on every occasion when his services were required in that honourable position, with the single exception of the general meetings of members. These meetings he held to be un-English, because the Charter did not allow the members to be out- spoken, and at Bedford pa^-ticularly not only his successor Mr. Holland) but also every member of the Council who was present at the general meeting must have felt that they occupied a false position, aud that the meeting itself was a sham. He then urged the great importance of popularising the Society, the framework of which was now too narrow. He would himself suggest one important general meeting of the Society in December, to which the election of members of the Council should be submitted. He held that the more fresh air and ventilation they obtained the better ; but they should always consider that the great object of the Society was to promote the pro- duction of the greatest quantity of food ou a given space, and that the prosperity of the Society was only to be obtained by its promotion of English agriculture. The President remarked that this was a question of the greatest possible importance to the Society, and was deserving of great attention. He thoroughly agreed that menjbers of the Society should have more voice in the elec:ion of members of the Council; but, in discussing the list of members, it should be borne in mind that since the formation of this Society many other agricultural societies had arisen, which ottered locally somewhat simi- lar advantages to its members. He feared that farmers too often looked only to the circumstances of their own locality, and uot to*English agriculture generally. With regard' to the question of discussing matters before Par- liament, or having a political tendency, he thought they should exercise great caution. The Earl of Lichfield expressed his great satisfaction that no opposition had been offered to the principle of his motion, as ou the previous occasion when he had brought forward the question he had been met with the argument that the Charter had worked very well, and that it was better to let well alone. Mr. Cantrell quite agreed with the object of the motion, and stated that it was generally considered the Council was too exclusive in electing its members. Mr. Dent Dent observed that at present the Council had no option as to the mode in which its members were elected, but he thought it most desirable that they should be enabled to consult the members of the Society on such matters. With reference to the other question, he re- minded the Council that the motto of the Society was, " Practice with Science," and he hoped that they would always confine themselves within its meaning. Mr W' EuERTON would be sorry to see such questions as road-legislation brought before the Council, and he 1 bought it most undesirable that they should trespass mto the inovince of Chambers of Agriculture. The motion having been put to the Couucil was carried unanimously, and the appointment of the committee was postponed until the next Monthly Council. 430 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. The Secretary was instructed to send letters relative to the Country meeting of 1876 to the authorities of Bir- mingham, Peterborough, Nottingham, Lincoln, and Derby. The Secretary was authorised to sign and seal with the common seal of the Society, a power of attorney to enable the London and Westminster Bank to receive the divi- dends on the Society's funded property. Au application from the Boiler Insurance and Steam Power Company (Limited), for the loan of the Society's Dynamometer, was granted on the usual terms and con- ditions. A commuuication was received from the statistical and commercial de2)artment of the Board of Trade, enclosing a copy of the programme of an international agricultural exhibition to be held in Algiers. The following special Committee for re^^ising the list of judges was appointed on the motion of Mr. Milward : — Colonel Kingscote, Mr. Barthropp, iMr. Booth, Mr. Bowly, Mr. Cautrell, Mr. Dent, Mr. Druce, Mr. Hemsley, Mr. Horley, Mr. Leeds, Mr. Masfen, Mr. Milward, Mr. Eandell, Mr. Rigden, Mr. Sanday, Mr. George Turner, IMr. Wells, Mr. Jacob Wilson, with the Hon. Director, and the Stewards of stock and implements. The general meeting of members was fixed for Thurs- I day, December 10, at 12 o'clock. The Council then adjourned to Wednesday, December 'J. THE FARMER S' CLUB. OUR VILLAGES: THEIR SANITARY REEORM. The first meeting of the Farmers' Club for the Winter Ses- sion took place on Monday evening, November 2, at the Salisbury Hotel, Mr. E. M. Major Luca« in the chair. The subject fixed for discussion, as given above, stood iu tlie name of Mr. James Howard, of Clapham Park, Bedford. The Chairman, in opening the proceedias^s, said he was extremely pleased to see so good an attendance after what was termed the recess and he hoped the gentlemen before him had all as good crops that year as they might expect, jn April and May they discussed the interests of farmers and the subject of land-laws and landlords ; that evening they were going to overhaul tlie villages and talk about sanitary reform. The subject before tliem would be introduced by a gentleman wlio had already read many excellent papers, and who did not re- quire any introduction from him to ensure attention to his contributions to tiie discussions of that Club. Without any further remark', he would call upon Mr. James Howard to open tiie subject. Mr. Howard then read the following paper -. — Introduction. — Revival or Sanitary Science. — As far back as 1848, and on many subsequent occasions down to qiite a recent date, the Loudon Earmers' Club has discussed tlie great subject of the sewage of our towns and cities ; but, singularly enough, it has never once turned its attention to the more home question of village sewage, and the sanitary condition of our rural population therein involved. Two or three months after the subjects for discussion in 1874 had been selected by the committee of the Club, the great contest in the rural districts between capital and labour occurred Tliis naturally attracted a large share of public sttention to the general condition of our rural population. Could 1 have foreseen that "special commissioners" would have been de- spatched to the disturbed districts, and graphic accounts of village-life morning after morning would liave been given to the country by the daily papers, I should probably have shrunk from handling a subject which was shortly to eugage the attention of so many able men. There are, however, phases of the question, and questions of a practical character, the discussion of which by the members of this club may tend to tiirow light on some of the problems yet unsolved. In a celebrated speech of the present Prime Minister of England the remarkable statement occurred tiiat " the first consideration of a minister should be the Jiealth of the people." Mr. Disraeli, like ministers in another sphere, did not, however, lead his hearers to suppose that the work was to be left exclusively to the ministers ; for he observed, " I think public attention ought to be concentrated on sanitary legislation. I cannot impress upon you too strongly my con- viction of the importance of the legislature and society uuiting together in favour of these important results." The prime minister evidently recognises the force of the well- known aphorism of Franklin, " Public health is public wealth." My object in bringing the subject bsfore the Club is to enforce the same maxim, and to induce its members and the agricul- tural public to unite in supporting the legislature in carrying into practice a wise, a thorough, and a beneficent system of sanitary legislation. The stage of civilisation at which a country has arrived may be gauged by the attention paid to cleanliness, and a natural observance by its members of the laws which govern health. The Greeks, the Romans, the Egyptians — to say nothing of the Jews — have left behind them faithful records, both in their literature and in the ruins of their cities, of the care they bestowed upon cleauliuess and its kindred subjects. After a long reign of ignorance, extending over many centuries, the present generation has witnessed a gradual awakening to the importance of sanitary matters ; already great strides have been made in sanitary science, and, as Dr. Arthur Ransome has remarked, when the time comes for writing the history of the reign of Queen Victoria, among the long list of beneficent enactments, it will be found that all the legislation of any real importance for securing the public health has beeti the work of the brilliant Victorian era. It would be easy ta quote sensational paragraplis from the official reports of commissioners as well as from other sources, but 1 shall refrain from attempting at any length to prove that our villages stand greatly in need of sanitary reform, for, not- withstanding Lady Stradbroke's pleasing picture, we must all admit the fact that a state of things exists in many, nay, I may say in most of our villages, which, as members of a civilised community, we deplore and would gladly see remedied. To retort that there is as great or greater need of refiorm in towns and cities, does not help the case, for, as a well-known Bir- mingham radical, in a recent article in T/te Fortnujhihj, says, " the dwellers in towns ought to be the first to admit the charge, and its justice should make them chary of condemning landlords und fanners in the country as more hard-hearted or illiberal than others. Both town and country are alike power- less to deal with the evil by individual effort or merely personal exertion, and they should strive to concert measures together for discovering and applying a remedy." I have said that I should not take up time iu attempting to prove, at any length, the necessity for reform, still, I cannot pass over the question without remark. I happen to reside in one of the best cared-for counties in England. The Dukes of Bedford liave, during the past 30 years, erected many hundreds of convenient and handsome labourers' cottages ; they have also carried out a variety of sanitary improvements upon their estate ; their efforts to raise the labourer's condition have stimu- lated other proprietors, many of whom, I am glad to say, have followed their example, and yet what do we find to be the state of things in many of the villages of this highly-favoured county P If time permitted, I could, from the reports of the Medical Officers to the Rural Sanitary Authority, give a cata- logue of facts and scenes as appalling and revolting as any to be found in Mr. CuUey's or Dr. Eraser's (the present Bishop of Manoiiester) reports to the late Government Whole vil- lages almost devoid of water, and dependent upon ponds and holes made by the roadside ; families herded together in wretched houses unfit for human dwellings, without drainage or privy accommodation, and with foul middens at their very doors. Writing of overcrowding (against which evil, as I shall hereafter show, the law has not provided a remedy), the medical officer of the Lorthem division of the county of Bedford, states " it is a comnon thing to find a married couple with five or six, and even ieven or eight sons and daughters of all ages THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 431 sleeping iu oi e, or at most, tno small rooms, without any chimney or effl lent means of ventilation. I have often, in the course of ray professional work, been called into these rooms at night when tlie greater part of the family have been in bed and when the state of the room has been sickening." Having alluded to such conditions militating against health, morality, and common decency, he concludes, " no more fertile source of the scrofulous diseases which are the scourge of our population can be conceived." Until the passing of the Public Health Act, 1873, the various Sanitary Act, so far as rural districts were concerned, were all but a dead letter, and useless. The Act of 1872, which, I may remark, was passed with tlie general concurrence of the public, although deficient in many particu- lars (a point I propose to take up at a later stage) was most important in tliis particular — it rendered the action of local authorities compulsory, so that most of the evils which exist can no longer be shirked, but must be dealt with in some way or other. Without dwelling farther upou the present condition of our villages, or wasting time in discussing tlieories, I propose at once to proceed to the more practical question, What can be done to remedy the existing evils ? and in the first place I will take up the question of that essential requirement of every community — water. W^ATER Supply. — I place water first, because, next to the food of the people, it is the most important requirement for every community ; and an abundant supply of pure water is not only of primary iraportauce in a sanitary point of view, but one of the greatest blessings of life. On the other hand, it is now generally recognised that no more fertile source of disease and human decay exists than bad and contaminated water. One authority asserts that to its use he has traced the origin of a variety of diseases ; among them he states " diarrhoea, dyspepsia, dysentery, malarious aud typhoid fevers are the most prominent." " At present the majority of villages suffer either from scarcity or impurity of water, or from both. Too long has the country been deluded by the fallacy that good water and plenty of it is the special quality of country districts." So wrote Mr. Bailey Denton, in the Ro>jal AjricnUnral Joiiriud, in 1870, and that the remarks were truthful has since been but too abuadautly proved by the reports of medical oiiicers iu all parts of the kingdom. The incumbent of a parish near to ray own writes me : "In this parish, ot over 3,000 acies, there are no springs, and wells are out of the question, owing to the great depth of the stratum of clay. During tliis last dry summer poor people had to go miles for their pailsf'ul of water, aud farmers had to send carts to the river for their supply" — a distance of several miles. There are no natural causes for sucli a state of things. Providence supplies us with an abundance of water, and the fault rests with the community. This, one of the most precious gifts of Nature, is grievously wasted and neglected. We have our wet seasons and our dry seasons; we canuot yet store up the heat of our summers, but there are no insuperable difficul- ties in storing tlie rains of winter. The average rainfall of England and Wales is at the rate of 33 inches per annum. Every inch per annum is equal to about 23,000 gallons — in weight no less than 100 tons — per acre. In our drier counties, with a rainfall of 20 inches, to say nothing of dew fall, upwards of 3,000 tons of water fall annually upon every acre. It is calculated tliat for the twenty- five millions of popula- tion in England and Wales, the supply of water, by rain alone, is twenty-seven railliou millions of gallons, or one hundred and eighteen thousand four hundred millious of tons ; that the quantity consumed by man and beast as well as by engines and other contrivances, is three hundred and sixty-five thou- sand millions of gallons — in other words, we only use about one-seventy-forth part of our total rainfall. From wells, streams, rivers, reservoirs, and tanks our wants are supplied. It appears to be the general opinion of sanitary authorities, that where good water can be obtained at a depth not exceeding thirty feet, a well is the best provision. Having sunk many wells myself, as well as some reservoirs, my expe- rience leads me to concur in this opinion. The only remark I would make about wells is, the great danger of contamination, if cesspools, privies, middens, sewers, or foul ponds are allowed near them. Many cases of filtration to wells from these sources, both in towns and villages, have come under my ob- servation, so that, long ago, having narrowly escaped from dangers of the kind, I resolved that the first thing to be done in going into a new liouse is to have the well examined aud the water tested. At a farmhouse in a village near Bedford, the occupier, some years ago, put up a water-closet, and ran the excreta into a large pond or moat some 100 or 120 feet from his well. No thought of danger was apprehended until an outbreak of illness occurred, when it was discovered that the well had been contaminated with human excrement. As to wells, however, there are very wide tracts of country where they are quite out of the question, and where storage is the only available method ; having long since been convinced by the reasoning of my friend, Mr. Bailey Denton, that it was a wise policy to husband the water which falls in winter for use in summer, ten years ago I dug a reservoir at Clapham Park for this purpose ; it is situated in the line of a master drain which conveys the drainage water of about 150 acres. This reservoir contains about 400,000 gallons, and cost £50 excavating ; a vast quantity of water passes through it in winter, aud, ever since it was made, we have had an abundant supply through the driest summers. So satisfied was I with the experiment, that last year I made a second one, of about double the size, at the other side of the farm. I am convinced that on the retentive clay soils of the kingdom, where wells cannot be provided, an abundant supply of water might thus be stored in reservoirs, connected either with main drains or streams. Where the natural formation of the ground is favourable for embanking at one end, as was the case with the second reservoir I made, they could be constructed at a com- paratively small expense. The water in my reservoirs is good enough throughout the year for most domestic uses ; but, for drinking purposes, it should be boiled or filtered, especially in the summer months. A collateral advantage from the general adoption of reservoirs would be that our winter floods in the valleys would be sensibly diminished. The vicar of a high-lying parish near to my own writes me as follows : " When I first came here (some 20 years ago), I had a well dug 40 feet deep, and bored anotlier 40 feet, with- out any change in the liard clay ; giving the work up in despair, I had a drain dug to a large pond about 20 yards off and well filled with washed gravel, and the water thus drained to the well has formed our supply ever since. It is cold and clear, and I believe, although I have not had it tested, quite pure. I attribute the pureness of the water to the length of the drain through which it has io percolate." I give this example, believing that many similarly situated will find this, or a less costly reservoir, the readiest plan of supplying their wants. 1 would advise them, however, to have the filter cleansed periodically. Reservoirs are more easily constructed, and at less expense than is generally supposed. Mr. Denton is of opinion that, by combination, an average sized village could, in many cases, be supplied with a reservoir, iron service pipes, and stand pipes for taps at a first cost of 25s. per head ; or, if the reservoir were constructed and paid for with money borrowed at 5 per cent., and the repayment spread over 40 years, sufficient water for each village could be obtained at a maximum cost of Is. 3d. per year per head. Dismissing the question of reservoirs, which must depend more or less upou local circumstances, I will pass on to the mode of storing water in tanks. Tanks for rain-water falling upon the roofs of houses are another means, now frequently resorted to, for storage. In a letter to The r/;«M, about twelve months ago. Sir Phillip Hose called attention to a plan adopted upon the chalk formation in the Cliiltern Hundreds ; he stated that a tank, 10 feet deep and six feet over, sufficient for two ordinary sized labourers' families, if the drains from the cottage roofs are properly con- nected, can be made in that district at an outside cost of £2 per cottage ; the ground is simply excavated to the required dimensions, and the sides and bottom plastered with three coats of Portland cement, mixed wi'h sand and gravel. There would, of course, be greater difficulty and expense in other formations where puddle or brickwork, or perhaps both, would have to be resorted to in order to make the reservoir durable and water- tight. The esp'^nse will, of course, vary with the character of the subsoil, but in no case can it be very formidable. A tank, 16 feet long by 10 feet wide, will, for every foot of depth, liold 1,000 gallons, and it is estimated that from the roof of an ordinary cottage, covering only 2| poles, as much as 7,00o gallons per annum may be collected when the rainfall is only 20 inches ; and so, from a farmhouse with outbuildings, covering 10 poles, 28,000 gallons a-year may he collected. I 432 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. need scarcely say that it is highly desirable that care should be taken in constructing such tanks to prevent the influx of impure water from surface drainage, and that, wherever practi- cable, the roof water should be passed through a filter bed of some kind. The other day I went over to see the sanitary improvements carried out by Sir Anthony Rothschild in his cottages at Aston Clinton and adjoining villages. I found that in each cottage, water, brought from the Cliiltern Hills, had been laid on. It is not everyone who can, in this particular, follow the example of Sir Anthony, or who, if willing, has a public water-works so near at hand. I have mentioned it, because on inquiry of the cottagers 1 found that it was a boon highly prized. One man remarked that he did not know what they should now do without it. The wife joined in, and said, " Yes, sir, it is a great convenience, and it saves us so much in soap." Indeed, who can estimate the value to these poor people uf an abundant and constant supply of the purest water for drinking, cook- ing, and washing, or— what is also important— its value for carrying away a good deal of filth, wliich, without it, would be sure to collect iu and about the dwellings? If time permitted, I could enumerate other means of providing water. In Egypt, where the water is only 13 to 20 feet below the sur- face, 1 have seen a mule or a doukey working a centrifugal pump, and often one of the primitive "sakias" — a kind "of chain and bucket lift — raise water enough for the supply of a large village. To those, however, who would pursue this subject of water supply further, I would refer them to Mr. Bailey Denton's excellent paper, " Village Sanitary Economy," published in the Royal Agricultural /oKr;m/ of 1870. Labol'kers' Dw£LLIi\gs.— Passing to the subject of cot- tages, I would remark that the labourer's home has for many years past afforded abundant material for discussion. The circumstances alluded to at the opening of my paper have, during the present year, had the effect of concentrating public attention to an unusual extent upon the important and vital question of improved dwellings for our peasantry. The providing of a sufficient number of new cottages for our agricultural population, and the reconstruction of deficient ones already existing, form a question of momentous interest, and the financial aspect presented is one of the gravest im- portance. Some idea of its magnitude may be gathered from the remarks which fell from Lord Napier and Ettrick at the Social Science Congress, two years ago. His lordsliip remarked, "If a minimum of one-third of the agricultural homes of Great Britain require to be rebuilt, you have some- thing like a measure of our great necessity on the rural side of the question. It is a matter of building 700,000 cottages, at a cost of 70 millions sterling." In the absence of complete census returns. Lord Ettrick made, perhaps, an estimate not far from the mark ; but, looking to the wide extent of the subject, the knowledge already possessed, and the limits of my paper, I will not dwell upon this portion of the subject, but pass on to the question of drainage, sewerage, and the disposal of sewage. Before doiug so, however, I would remark that a few years ago 1 built a block of six cottages, for my own farm labourers, entirely of concrete. This material is decidedly better than brickwork, is warm and dry — indeed, impervious. The walls are a foot thick, each cottage has three bedrooms, and each is provided with an earth closet at the end, but accessible from within. Tlie cost of the whole exclusive of the earth closets, was only a little over £000. Drainage, Sewerage, and Sewage.— I would point out that drainage and sewerage, formerly interchangeable terms, have come to mean two things. Drainage is now understood to be the means of draining off and conveying water from the soil and surface ; sewerage the means of removing refuse in a liquid or partially liijuid state. In an assembly of practical agriculturists, I need not enlarge upon the sanitary advantages of under-draining. The improve- ments wiiich have taken place in our rural districts by drain- ing away the subsoil and surface water are so manifest as to be universally recognised if not universally adopted. In my o»n county ague and fever, 30 and 40 years ago, were very common in certain villages ; since draining has been carried out the former has altogether disappeared, and tiie latter has greatly decreased. To prevent eapilkry attraction, and to ensure dry cottages it is highly desirable— in some cases indispensable — to put in a drain completely around the buildings at a lower level than the foundations. Before building my own house, situated on boulder clay, I not only did this, but carried a drain right through the centre. As a proof of the good resulting from such drainage, even to the lower animals, 1 may say that some years ago being at the country stables of a well-known London horse-dealer, he complained to me ot tUe trouble he had experi- enced in keeping his horses in health and free from colds. The soil is London clay. I advised him to adopt the same means I subsequently put in practice at my own house. On meeting him a few montiis ago he assured me that he had derived the greatest benefit from having followed my advice ; indeed, that he had had very little trouble since. I need not however dwell further upon drainage, a question well understood by agriculturists, but piss on to the more knotty points ot sewerage, and how the sewage is to be dis- posed of. A great variety of schemes have been before the public for dealing with sewage, but in treating of village sew- age, I do not deem it necessary to occupy time in discussing them, for practically there are only two systems open for adoption in rural districts, namely, earth or box closets, and water sewerage. In scattered villages a general system of sewarage, like that adopted in our towns and cities, is in most cases out of the question, not only cu account of the expense, but because waterworks are an essential portion of the plan. There is moreover an additional oljection -. sew- age irrigation, a necessary part of the system, whilst most successful and economical on a large scale, is troublesome and expensive on a small one. Whilst s'rougly in favour of ■ sew- age irrigation) for what I may term " populous places," I have come to the conclusion that for most villages the earth or box .system will have to be depended upon. As previously stated, I paid a visit lately to the estate of Sir Anthony Roths- child in Buckinghamshire. The worthy baronet has carried out tiie earth system in the most thorough manner, and, I may observe, as only an autocrat can do. Would that all auto- crats were as enlightened and liberal as Sir Anthony Roths- child. Earth-closets have been supplied for 175 cottages and three schools. Two men and a horse-and-cart are employed the whole year round in attending to them ; one man iu collecting the earth and carrying it to and from the cottages and the drying-kiln, the other in preparing and drying the material. The kiln floor is over a retort at a private gas- works, and therefore the fuel costs nothing; and as to smell, so corapleie is the deodorisation that nothing off'ensive can be detected. About 200 tons of earth are required annually, which is dried twice over, and yields about 120 tons of excel- lent manure. The farm-manager informed me that it is a good fertiliser for any crop, and the lowest estimate to be placed upon its value is £3 per ton — perhaps £4 is nearer the mark ; Sir Anthony, therefore, has not made a very bad in- vestment. My experience of earth-closets has convinced me that it will not do to leave them to the cottagers without some oversight. I could if necessary give many proofs. I have already spoken of the water-supply to the Aston Clinton cottages. The slops from the sinks, &c., are carried by a sewer to a small water-tight tank or cesspool in each cottager's garden. The sewers being trapped outside the cottage walls, no effluvium escapes. The occupiers empty the cess- pools about once in a week or ten days, and use it upon their gardens. Mr. Rogers Field, C.E., of 5, Cannon-row, West- minster, lias adopted at his cottages, situated at Shenfield, near Brentwood, a very simple and ingenious tank. Attached to the tank is a self-acting syphon, which, when the tank becomes full— not till then, draws off the liquid and discharges it into sub-irrigation drains laid one foot deep, with common two-incii agricultural pipes. The solid matter left at the bottom of the tanks is occasionally cleared out by the cottagers and used for manuring their gardens. This sub-irrigation has been carried on for six years past. The liquid is said to be readily absorbed by the soil and vegetation, and tlie plan to yield good results. Whether plants should be thus nourished or irrigated from beloiv is open to question, but it is not a very material point so long as the refuse is got rid of without trouble or creat- ing a nuisance. The price of the tank, £5, is a much more serious objection ; but one, however, Mr. Field hopes to remove by getting the tanks made at half-price in earthenware instead of iron. In dismissing the subject oi tanks or cesspools, I may observe that whenever adopted, in order to compel frequent THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 433 empfying, they cannot well be too small, and, with a view to prevent leakage, too carefully constructed. With lespect to water-sewerage, I would for a moment call attention to the following typical case from a recent report of the medical officer to the Bedford Rural Sanitary Authority. In reporting his visit to a large village on the banks of a river, after urging the necessity of establishing some general principle in dealing with the disposal of excreta. Dr. Prior, the officer, states, "I find large drains or sewers in course of construction, the level of the lower portion of which will be two feet below that of the mill-head, and wliich will ultimately empty them- selves into the mill-tail. This mill-tail and the mill-head in tlie next village are not very far from synonymous, and it is not to be supposed that the inhabitants of the latter place can look with complacency on any scheme for the discharge of sewage into the stream whence some derive their water for household purposes, and some their drinking-water. More- over by the 11 and 12 Vic, c. 63 and 80, and the 29 and 30 Vic, c. 90 and 111, the polhition of any stream under the control of the sanitary authority is constituted an offence punishable by fine. We are thus immediately brouglit face to face with cue of the preliminary difficulties which beset the application of a system of sewerage to villages ; but there are many others so numerous and so formidable that they can only be met completely by a system of water-works and sewage irrigation, if they can be by that. It is therefore with grave reluctance that I should witness the attempted extension of such a system to districts purely rural." I have described this as a typical case, for unquestionably where sewers are made in villages they, as a rule, empty their contents into the nearest stream. Looking to the certainty that the time is at hand when the public w ill no longer tolerate the practice of pouring filth into our beautiful streams and water-courses, it will be well that in the cise of new sewers tliey should be laid with a view to the sewage being ultimately utilised by irrigation. Unless this is kept in view, many mis- takes are likely to be made in the levels of the outfall sewers. The Local Government Board has recently — as I think un- wisely— sanctioned the opinion that " House Slops" do not come under the head of sewage, and can therefore be dis- charged into rivers and running streams. Notwithstanding this decision there is no doubt that the public will insist upon house slops — mostly urine and other filthy stuff — being in- cluded in the prohibition I have referred to. from conversa- tions with Mr. Bruce (Lord Aberdare), I know that, but for the lenght of time taken by the River Pollution Commis- sioners in completing their report, ti\e late Governmant were prepared to deal with this subject three years ago. Now that we have a Government whose policy is endorsed as a " sewage policy," there ought not to be a doubt that it will be effectually and quickly dealt with. My friend, Mr. W. Hope, the well-known sanitary engineer and sewage farmer, to whom I wrote for information upon a point or two, has been good enough to furnish me with a copy of a report he had made to a rural sanitary authority in the North. I wish that time permitted to read it, for it is full of valuable information. Reporting upon three adjacent but scattered villages, Mr. Hope says, that to sewer them thoroughly and to connect every house and privy would be so costly that the people would abscond rather than pay the rates, and tlierelore recommends the pail or box system, a plan very much adopted in my own district. Mr. Hope recommends galvanised iron pails, with a handle at each end, and says if they are made to hold about 20 gallons each, they will last an average family of five persons for a week, end if emptied into a previously dug trench and covered over, the result will be that the garden will be manured, and the excretal matter will never be heard of again. The inspector to the Rural Sanitary Authority, Bedford, informs me ttiat box-closets answer well, and, as a rule, are made to suit the old privies. He finds about 2 feet 6 inches long, 1 foot 6 inches deep, and 1 foot 6 inches wide are a convenient size. The closet lid should be made to lift up on hinges, and either the riser made moveable, or a door and frame made large enough to draw out the box at the end of the privy. Galvanised iron is the best material : with wood and zinc the soil percolates the zinc, and decays the wood : either ashes or earth answers very well. Unless the lid is made to lift on hinges a great nuisance is caused by throwing in the ashes, as some of these always remain on the seat if thrown down the hole carelessly. On the question of house slops Mr. Hope states that lie found that the total quantity escaping did not amount to more than 0.13 of an inch of rain; a small garden therefore is sufficient to deal with the slops, and recommends the system of sub-irrigation and subsoil drainage. Reporting upon another village more densely populated, Mr. Hope recommends it being sewered, provided that fair terms can be made to connect the sewers with those of an adjoining town in possession of a sewage farm : a desirable plan for villages thus situated, and one, I may observe, which has been carried out between the borough of Bedford and the great County School, built in an adjoining village. Mr. Hope justly observes : " Nothing is so unsatisfactory or so expensive and troublesome as sewage irrigation on a very small scale. If the flow of the sewage does not run to 50,00(J gallons a day there is not enough to give continuous occupation to one man, and the result always is that it is neglected ; so it neither answers from a sanitary nor from a pecuniary point of view." When circuln^tances are favourable in a village for water sewerage, perhaps the plan carried into practice at Eastwick Park Farm, near Leatberhead, will be found worthy of atten- tion. In the Saniiary ifecor;^ of Saturday last, Mr. Hutchinson, steward of the Eastwick Park Estate, calls attention to the effective and economical means of disposing of the liquid refuse of the village of Eastwick, and the liquid ma- nure of the farm, by the use of a self-acting sewage regu- lator, the joint-invention of Mr. Bailey Denton and Mr. Rogers Eield. This contrivance is said effectually to over- come the dilteulty of dealing with a small flow of sewage without constant attendance, but as I have not seen it in ope- ration I can express no opinion. Sanitary Laws — Difficulties and Defects. — I now come to the difficulties of carrying the sanitary laws into effect, and the shortcomings of tliese laws. On this branch of my subject I have taken counsel with Mr. Sharman, solicitor, ot Bedford, a gentleman of great experience as clerk to the Rural Sanitary Authority, and for years clerk to the Board of Guardians, and who has kindly given roe the benefit of his knowledge and experience. One of the chief and most perplexing difficulties arises from the number of Acts of Parlia- ment, partly in existence and partly repealed, also from the mixture in the Acts of urban and rural provisions in such a way as to render it a matter of considerable doubt, to all ordinary persons, what the law really is, and causing much trouble, even to experts. The only remedy is the consolidation of the Acts, or a new general Act, repealing all existing Acts, so framed that the provisions relating to urban and rural authorities, to gas, water, iScc, shall be separated. The defects in the rural sanitary laws are chiefly manifest in the provisions which deal with (I) water supply; (2) sewerage; (3) over- crowding ; (41) iuiectious diseases. (1.) With respect to wa'er, the law gives power to the sanitary authority to cause to be provided a necessary supply of water to a house without a proper supply, providing it can be furnished to it at a rate not exceeding 2d. per week. This rate of 2d. is found to be totally inadequate ; practically there is no power to compel an owner to provide a good supply of wholesome water, and though under the Act of last session power is given to magistrates to close a well or cistern, people may still be compelled and are at liberty to draw their sup- plies from even more objectionable sources. Whilst feeling the necessity of not pushing sanitary regulations too far, I do think that this time of day a house ^hich has not a decent water supply ought to be condemned as unfit for human habi tation. (2.) In the matter of sewers and sewage, when new cottages are built, the sanitary authority can compel owners to make suitable provision, but the law gives no power to compel an owner of any existing cottage to provide it with a privy or closet, and if he has one, and pulls it down, there is no power to make him build another, In a vast number of villages a drain, originally made to carry off the surface-water from the road, runs down the main street ; into this drain the inhabitants have assumed the right to pour their filth. The question often arises to whom does this drain belong ? The highway board or parish surveyors repudiate it, and say it is a sewer ; the sanitary authority re- pudiates it as a mere surface-drain. Should not powers be conferred upon sanitary authorities to cut off the communi- 434 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. cations, aud thus compel the inhabitauts to make suitable provision for their sewage ? The powers given for the prevention of pollution of streams are apparently ample, but the remedies are by no means simple. It is next to impossible to persuade county magis- trates to cut off these drains, converted into sewers, especially in the absence of any other provisiou for the sewage. ladict- raents and Chancery injunctions are not nice proceedings against neighbours, and therefore the abominations, with tlieir evil conse(iuences, continue, because the law is puzzling, and the county magistrates timid or squeamish. Perhaps the county court judge of the district might be armed with power to grant an injunction, and to deal with such cases. (3.) As to overcrowding, this is a question of no little diffi- culty ; still, as matters stand, there is no law to prevent a dozen grown-up people, if of one family, living and sleeping iu one room. The Acts of the 29 and 30 Vic, c. 90, and the JS'uisances Removal (1865) appear to clash ; perhaps the simplest method would be to rix. a minimum space to each in- dividual, aud in accordance, give powers to sanitary inspectors to prohit overcrowding. (4). As to infectious diseases, owing to the circumlocution now necessary where disinfectants are required, disease is often spread half over a village before steps can be legally taken to arrest it. Power should be invested in the sanitary authority, upon an t-.i-yymYe order of a magistrate, at once to disinfect any such premises iu case of default upon the part of the oc- cupier. Powers should also, I venture to think, be given to sanitary authorities to erect or hire houses to be used as hos- pitals, without having to wait for the sanction of the Local Government Board. As a further precaution agaiust the spread of infectious diseases, some amendment of the Act of 29 and 30 Vic, cap, 90, is required, with a view to prohibit children from an infected iiouse going to schools or other public places. In the Society of Arts report, just imblished, the following appears ; " The past session has shown that the President of the Local Government Board was at last becoming aware of the reasonableness of the viows,so persistently urged upon him by the committee, that somebody of higher authority, and pre- siding over an area of greater extent than that of a Town Council or Board of Guardians, was required to control a direct local action, and that a supervision and correction of boundaries of districts was an essential to the initiation and completion of sanitary measures." At a conference of medical officers of health, held at King's College, London, in January last, at which the defects, re- quirements, and difficulties appertaining to the present sani- tary laws were fully debated, an important string of resolutions was unanimously adopted. Without setting aside the present machinery, the necessity was affirmed by the first resolution, that if combined sanitary districts were to be maintained, each should possess a central committee consisting of members ap- pointed by the several sanitary authorities entering into the combination; and further, that each of the latter should manage its sanitary duties through the medium of a special committee of its own body, instead of atterajiting to do it by the agency of the wliole board of guardians at large. It was argued iu favour of combined districts, that it would economise the time both of officers of health and other persons concerned; that much labour would be saved in keeping books, making returns; attending meetings ; that it would tend to uniformity of action, for it would not have to contend with the conflicting opiuioivs of the proper interpretation of the law by the clerks of adjacent districts ; and also put an end to much waste of labour aud inefficient administrations to which the want of a completely organised constitution now gives rise. Another point rigorously insisted upon was, that the district medical officers should not be appointed health officers, as even men of good professional standiug felt the duties to be a serious embarrassment ; and in the case of a needy practitioner, hold- ing perhaps a local appointment, liow could he be expected to fuliii the duties ol tlie office iu the face of the magnates of the neighbourhood ? " S. G. 0.," in one of his vi^oruous letters to The Timet upon this subject, asked " Where is the town or village which has not its inflaential magnate or magnates ?" and argued powerfully against local control. Grand schemes for sanitary government are being propounded ; the country is to be mapped out for the purpose into districts corresponding with its natural watersheds, and other great changes advocated ; but if the pre- sent rural sanitary authorities will only carry out the Acts with willingness and a fair amount of determination, such is the fear entertained by the public of being over-governed by sani- tary officials, tiiat they may be let aloue for many years to come; if, however, an opposite course should be pursued by them, tlie signs of the times point to a speedy transfer of their powers to other bodies. Co:ncludikg OBSERVATIO^'S. — In bringing ray observations to a close, I would call attention to the fact that where well- considered sanitary measures have been adopted in towns and cities the advantages to the inhabitauts have been so marked that the circumstances should act as a powerful stimulus to exertion in carrying the same benefits to our villages. Iu the borough of Bedford, where a comprehensive scheme of sewerage and water supply was carried out a few years ago, the general health of the inhabitants has greatly improved, and the death rate has fallen to the very low average of 16.08 per thousand, or about 20 per cent, below the former mortality ; indeed the town of Bedford is now healthier than the surrounding country districts. Again, at Salisbury, it was stated at the recent mee*ing of the British Association that in consequence of the sanitary improvements carried out in that city the death-rate has fallen from 27 in a thousand to 16 in a thousand. As farmers we have the deepest interest in rearing a race of men " strong to labour ;" unquestionably the strength, moral and physical, of our peasantry depend to a large extent upon the sanitary conditions with wiiich tiiey are surrounded. There is nothing more certain than that the race cannot im- prove, but will degenerate, unless the conditions arc favourable. The subject I shall conclude with is one I would willingly pass over, but the labour question is one in which the landlord, the tenant, aud the labourer, as well as the public, have the profoundest interest, for upon the labour supply the value of land in all countries mainly depends. I am not an alarmist, still I do not think it wise that sve should shut our eyes to the fact that our colonies and other countries are coming forward in a way they have never done at any former period — in some- thing like an organised form — to bid for our labour, aud the competition and the organisation both appear to be growing. Danger at present does not appear to be imminent, and it is, perhaps, au idle boast of the emigrant agents that tliey will drain our rural districts of their best blood ; still it is the object at which they aim, and the inovement, disfigured though it is by violent language, may just as well be looked fairly in the face. To argue this subject would however be beyond the scope of my paper, and might lead to differences of opinion. I therefore content myself by simply alluding to the facts by way of preface to the remark that the natural affection of an Englishman for his home and country is proverbial, but when that home is a wretched hovel, what is there to bind and localise the labourer's sympathy or attachment ? How can we, under such circumstances, expect him to withstand the wiles of emigration agents and other interested leaders ? Put the same man into possession of a sweet and comfortable cottage, a well manured garden, with its vegetables and flowers, an orchard with a prospective crop of fruit to pay the rent, home under sucli circumstances is a reality not to be hastily bartered away for the frozen fields of Canada, the plains at the Antipodes, or the more tempting prairies of the Jj'ar West. Mr. Hope (Romford) had listened with deep interest to the paper just read, and there were only one or two points iu it with which he did not agree. Mr. Howard though that the Sanitary Act of 1872 made the action of the sanitary authorities compulsory, and that interference on their part could no longer be shirked. He could wish that were the case, but unfortunately he had had a good deal of experience to the contrary. It was, perhaps, within the knowledge of many gentlemen present that for the last five years he had been endeavouring to utilise the sewage of Ilomford, in Essex. Instead of making a handsome profit of it, as he expecteJ, he had sustained a heavy loss. For some time he could not understand why that was the case, as everything was conducted secumlem artcm, and he had the assistance of the Committee of the British Association in recording his experi- ments. At last it was discovered that the population of Romford, instead of being, as he was told, 8,0U0, was only 6,500, aud of that umiiber only 4.',500 were included in the area which supplied the sewage. The Local Board of Rom- ford had advertised the sewage, and they entered into a lease "demising" the sewage to himself. In the first year he THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 435 obtained such results as he expected, the quantity of land being only 60 acres ; but the case became different when his opera- tiouB were extended, the reason being obvious. The Local Board being a public boJy, he appealed to them with con- fidence fur justice, but they would have nothing to say to him, and the result was that he had first to go into a court of law, and was now in the Court of Chancery ; and when be was likely to get out of the latter court he did not know (laughter). As regarded tlie (juestiou of compulsion, the first Act said that if a complaint were made to the Secretary of State that a local authority was not doing its duty, be might enforce compliance with the object of the Act, the word being "may," not "shall," and a subsequent Act transferred the permissive power from the Home Secretary to the Local Government Board. He did not know whether Mr. Howard meant to apply the word " circumlocution " to the latter, but it seemed to him to apply to all Government departments, and he ventured to say that the existing powers were insufficient. With regard to the question of providing reservoirs for water, lie feared that the word reservoir was almost synonymous with pond, and that if open reservoirs were used — unless the water were boiled and filtered before being used, which was not likely to be done very carefully in labourers' cottages — serifus consequences to health would eusue. The nidus of typhuid fever was supposed to be vegetalile substances, such as leaves, and with open resorvoira tlier.? was great danger of fever being spread from that source. But covered reservoirs sufficient for the purpose need not be exceedingly expensive. Some time ago he provided one to contain SUO,000 gallous at a cost of £2,500. As regarded the construction of new cottages, it had been proposed by Lord Napier that the entire co^t of construc- tion need not be repaid in 25 years, and lie did not see what was the necessity for repajiiig withiu that period ; or why a certain proportion of tiie costs — say two-thirds or or.e-half — should not remain as a peamauent Lurdeu on the es tate. For the disposal of slops by subsoil drainage, the system alluded to by Mr. Howard was at once simple and eflicieut. But it was necessary that ihe subsoil pipes should be socket-pipes or else have collars. They should be placed like an inverted herring- bone, and as near the surface as possible, so that it miglit easily be cleared, in which case, if no great manurial vahie were obtained, there would at all events be no nuisance. lu the case ol liecal matter, he had used such galvanised tanks or pails as Mr. Howard had described, and found them to answer completely. Dr. VoELCKER (London) wished to make one remark in reference to what had been said about tanks. He was an advocate for the use of open tanks in villages, provided that the bed were properly formed. He believed, in fact, an open tank to be preferable in the country to a covered one. He was a great believer in the potential agency of atmospheric oxygen, which, coming in contact with shallow water, would fully o.xydise everything of an organic character whicli it might contain. He niu«t remind ilr. Howard that the reservoirs of the largest companies v.ere open, and the advantage of that was that there was a readier access for the oxygen than «hen closed reservoirs were used. [A Member: "That prevents evaporation."] Yes ; but under that system they also saved great expense. Again, he thought tiiey should be very careful how they introduced the sewage system into rural districts. As to the water-closet system, he believed that in villages and small towns they could easily get rid of human excreta without having recourse to that expensive system, which had, he might observe, polluted their rivers and their small water- courses to a fearful extent. Ouly that morning he had rend an account of au alarming outbreak of typhus fever in the Over- Darwen district, in Lancashire. He was not surprised at that state of things, recollecting what he had seen there two years ago. At that time he bad spoken very strongly against the use which was being made, by the mill -owners and other inhabitants of the locality, of the border of a small river for the sewage. He could not help saying that he tliought it quite possible to get rid of human excreta without polluting water in that way, or running the risk ot injuring persons who lived at a distance. Mr. Fowler (Aylesbury) having visited the village of Aston Clinton, referred to by Mr. Howard in his ad- mirable paper, could bear testimony to the excellent re- sults of the earth-closet system, under the management of Sir Anthony Rothschild ; and he could also state that he had seen the system in operation elsewhere, and anything more foul than the operation of that system withiut proper supervi- ion it would be impossible to conceive. He had found tlie receptacle for dry earth converted into a place for keeping sfaggots and storing wood ; and on opening a lid underneath he found a liquid cesspool. Tliey ail knew how careless poor cottagers were apt to be in reference to everything relating to sanitary matters, and they might feel quite certain that, gene- rally speaking, if there were a pail of slops to be disposed of, it would be likely to go into the earth-closet, supposing that to be the nearest to hand. Sir Anthony Rothschild's system was admirably carried out ; but the earth-closets were all kept under lock and key, and neither Mr. Howard nor himself could get a sight of them. The man who had the key lived two miles off, and on going there theyifound the earth being prepared for carting to the village, where it would afterwards be carted back agaiu. As a contrast to the admirable manner in which Sir Anthony managed matters, he might observe that, while staying at the house of a member of I'arliament, he went to au earth-closet in an adjacent garden, and found it covered over with cobwebs, none of the earth liaving been removed for two or three raontlis. As regarded the question of the sanitary condition of the people, and how it might be ameliorated, he might appeal to his friend Mr. Treadwell, who was the chair- man of a local board in Ins district, whetlier the great object there was not to save money p He did not think much was being done practically for the sanitary improvement of labourers' cottages. He knew, indeed, that it was a most difficult tiling to do any good in that respect; tlie first point was, in his opinion, to educate people into love or care for sanitary improvement (Hear, hear). If there were a broken window, the poor would stuff the hole with a r.ag, and they could not bear to leave a window open. There was, in fact, tlie greatest difficulty, as a rule, in getting them to attend to matters that concerned their own health. A labourer of his having had his hand injured diiving steam cultivatiou, and lock-jiw having supervened and resulted in death, he after- wards found the deceased's family living in such a wretched drtelliug that the dead body had to be lelt in the room where the family lived, and the whole family slept in one room ; yet the father and two sons were earning among them 45s. a week, and younger children from 8s. to 10s. besides. As to sewage irrigation, he felt that the question was a very difficult one, but he was fully convinced that, where practicable, it was the only solution of the question. He had been to see the works at Luton, and anything more foul or filthy he had never wit- nessed. Tiie elil'ient was, he believed, about equal to the standard laid down by the committee on that subject, and it was as black as ink. This was carried out under the precipita- tion or lime principle, Mr. Treadwell (L'pper Winchendon) having been pointedly alluded to by Air. Fowler, as the chairman of a local sanitary board, could not help rising to repudiate the character which had been given to that board. He totally denied that their first aia was to save money : their first aim was to get the people into clean habits as quickly as possible, and they found that a very difficult job (laughter). They lound themselves thwarted at every step. Some parties were very much averse to being interl'erred with at all, while in many instances the Act of Parliament did not allow them to go far enough. As regarded the erection of uew cottages, he thought there should be power on the part of the authorities to compel owners to supply them with water and consume their own nuisances (laughter). It was too bad, that when men had built cottages for their own merest and benefit, they "-hould call upon the occupiers of the soil to supply their tenants with water, and to convey the filth away from their property. Supposing that were done, ths pecuniary result as regarded those owners viould be that th.ey would exact more rent, because the cottages would be worth more money (Hear, hear). So far as ills advice could be of any use, he would insist that the owners of cottages should be made to do all that was necessary for sanitary purposes, instead of the cost being thrown on the general rates of the parish. He did not agree with Mr. tioward, that the local boards had no compulsory powers iu respect to privies. He thought they had, at all events, power to say whether or not tiiere should be one privy •r two privies for two cottages. He was one of those who did not like to move too fast iu those matters [A voice, " A Conservative," 436 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. fallowed by lHn;;liter]. Yes if tliey pleased. He would rather not see people driven iu such matters, if it could be avoided. He would, however, insist on having at least one privy for two cottages, and, perhaps, as tlie people advanced, they would be enabled to go beyond that. As to the earth-closet, those of Sir Anthony Rothschild's cottages, they were, no doubt, perfect, but tliat was not the case with all closets of that kind. He should be very glad if owners of property generally would imitate Sir Anthony. As regarded water, there was in his district a good f upply running from the Chiltern Hills ; but all owners would not avail themselves of it, what they desired being that the Sanitary Board should do the work for them, whereas, in his opinion, they ought to be compelled to do it themselves. He believed that the local Sanitary Boards had power to prevent over-crowding in cottages, even if all the iu- habtants be onged to one family, in cases in which tlie overcrowding was such as was injurious to health. The water supply was a very serious question. In many villages it was impossible to get an adequate supply of water in such a summer as the last. In a village in his district, on the recom- mendation of the Local Government Boatd, tiie practice was adopted of s nding a man round the village every day to sell water; but after the third or fourth dav the practice ceased, because no one would buy any water. He supposed that when people coull not get water without paying for it, tliry did not require so much (laughter). Mr. H. Trethewy (SIUop) felt that they were greatly indebted to Mr. Howard for the admirable way in which lie had introduced that questi m. Practically, it was the most absorbing questiou of tlie day, and no member of tbe Club was more competent to do justice to it than Mr. Howard. Their friend liad told them what he had done on his own estate, but he had not told them that he was the main mover in the changes at Bedford, which had been attended with so much benefit. All of them, who had had ought to do witli that questiou practically, must have felt how difficult it was to carry out the various Acts of Parliament. Mr. Sbarraan, the clerk of the Bedford Board, who was alluded to by Mr. Howard, had remarked that there were so many Acts that it was really difficult to know how far any of them applied to a particular case, an evil which had been felt very ranch on his own Board. Boards had to administer the law, bnt it was truly and pro- perly observed by the last speaker that they should endeavour to lead the people and not drive them. It was very uncertain how far the powers of Sanitary Boards extended. Allusion had been made to privies. It had been said that there conld be no difficulty in securing the requisite privy accommodation. Mr. Treadwell contended that there should in all cases be at least one privy for two cottages, but unfortunately cottages were sometimes so arranged that it was scarcely possible to have a separate privy. Of course, it might be replied, that that was the business of the owner ; that if lie chose to build a cottage in such a situation he must take the consequences. As a rule, he thouglit there would not be mucli trouble in that rcspeet. With regard to overcrowding, he differed from almost every one who had spoken on that subject that evening. Mr. Treadwell said he thought there was power to prevent it ; in his opinion, there was not power. He knew an instance in which the magistrates liad recently dismissed a complaint.^ It was a clear case of overcrowdiner, but the magistrates could not see that it was a clear case for them to adjudicate upon. Mr. Treadwell inquired where that occurred? Mr. H. Trethewy replied that it was at Wobnrn. Mr. Treadwell said he believed the magistrates had now adjudicated upon it. Mr. Tretuewy proceeded : As regarded the application of the sewage system to villages, he thought there would be great difficulties in carrying it out successfully, and lie believed that tliere were simple remedies, for the evil to be dealt with which might be effectually applied. Having had some experience in re- ference to earth closets, he did not believe they could ever get people to attend to them on a large scale, or that they could be carried out generally a-i thry were under Sir Anthony Rothschild. On the whole, he could see notbing better than the old-fashioned privies, provided the cesspool were not placed too low and were well ceiiiected ; and the smaller it was made in reason, tlie better. They ought to bear in mind that the new Act liad come upon them very suddenly. In dealing with that question, men were too apt to speak as il all the cottages belonged to the owners of landed property, and that it was their duty to do all that was necessary ; whereas, in fact the majority of the cottages, especially iu small parishes, belonged to small proprietors, a great many of whom had not tlie means of doing what was requisite. Again, they ought not to be hasty iu carrying out the provision of these Acts, and condemning all cottages which did not come up to the standard set up by the medical officer of the district. If all such cottages were to be pulled down, where were the poor inhabitants to go? Surely a bad home was better than no home at all (Hear, hear). They should endea- vour to remove evils gradually, and not go too fast ; and he had no doubt that it was in that way that they would do the most good in the end. If the Act was strictly carried out, the result'might be that a large proportion of the cottages of this country would be declared to be uninhabitable ; their doom would be sealed, they would be pronounced unfit to live in ; and although he did not mean to say that no step should be taken iu that direction as respected a great many cottages, y(t he did think that tbose who had to administer the law should deal with tbe evil gently and gradually. Mr. T. Horley (Warwickshire) agreed with the last speaker that, the Act having come upon them suddenly, they should rather endeavour to educate the people up to it than carry out its provisions hastily ; and he believed that if it were carried out according to its strict letter, the result would be the condemnation, not only of a large portion of the cottages of the labourers, but also of a large portion of the homesteads of the farmers (Hear, hear). He had taken con- siderable interest in that matter ever since the question first came under his notice. In iiis Union they were fortunate in having a very sensible man as their medical officer, and they had endeavoured to educate people up to the new law rather than put it in force before they knew what it meant. He was not an advocate for providing earth-closets, unless they could be placed under some responsible management like that alluded to in the case ot Sir Antiiony Rothschild. He believed that the old-fashioned midden system would, in most cases, be found better than the earth-closet system, but il that system were pursued the smaller the pan the better. An earth-closet, of the size of which Mr. Howard spoke, woiild require a man to attend to it; and unless it w. re attended to regularly, it might become a great nuisance. He thought the introduction of sewage irrigation into villages would prove a great nuisance. The contamination ot wells was an evil which it was always difficult to avoid, and the danger would be increased by the adoption of that system. Mr. A. Pell, M.P. (Leicestershire), lived in a Union where it was decided from the first that the new Act should come into operation through the action of a committee, and not of the whole Board, and he believed that, unless the sanitary authorities generally proceeded in that way, it would be found very difficult to give effect to the Act. The chief disputed point in Mr. Howard's paper appeared to be the closet system versus the water conveyance of fiecal matter. Ho » ever desirable it migiit be to adopt the earth system in cottages, it would be impossible to dispense with the other system. Mr. Howard had mentioned a clever way of disposing of fluid matter by sub-draining — Mr. Field's system of sub-irrigation ; but any plan which was adopted by an authority should be one generally applicable, and the system in question was clearly not applicable where there was no garden, or where the garden rose above the level of the site of the cottage. That objection seemed to him unanswerable, and he ventured to say that, whether the earth-closet system was adopted or not, there must be some apparatus or means adopted for carrying away tlie sewage water, and it must be carried away rapidly and effectually, in order that it might not soak into wells, and contaminate the drin'iing water. The district iu which he lived vias most favourable for the spread of lever. The soil was of a loose description, resting on an impervious clay; you seldom had to dig down more than five or six feet before you got to water, and that being the case, it was not very difficult to understand that the inhabitants of cottages might, without great care, be easily poisoned through what came from the surface, there being perhaps, in many cases, a pig kept very near tiie well, and slops being constantly thrown down in the same direction. In that Union they had been favoured with a visit from a gentle- man from Whitehall, who was in favour of tlie adoption of the earth-closet system. In point of fact, they knew very well what was required, but the question was, how far they werejustified THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 437 1q taxing tlie public for such an experiment. Wlierever fever had been found to exist — and, alas ! it was a frequent visitor to the Union — the locality was immediately mapped out, and a public sewer was constructed on tne system suggested by Col. Riwlinson, the engineer of the Local Government Board In some parishes the cost of sucii a work was a tliousand pounds, in others only five or six hundred. Tliey had been able to borrow money of the Government for such pur- poses at a very low rate of interest, and they had fonnd the sanitary rate to be less than the fever rate. To that lie might add, that the one fell upon the right persons, and the other upon the wrong oues (Hear, hear). In the case of a charge for meeting a fever rate, with proper sanitary appliances, three-fourths of the burden fell on the owners of the house property, and one-fourth on the land iu the im- mediate locality ; whereas, if sanitary measures were neglected, and fever and pauperism resulted, the cost thus occasioned did not fall on the immediate locality, but was spread over the entire Union. One word with regard to Medical Officers of Health. The employment of such men was ia many cases a very serious matter. He would go so far as to aay that, in many instances, that great and expensive gentleman was not merely not necessary, but that he was a positive mischief. It was perfectly well known that fevers arose from imperfect drainage and bad water. Tiiey did not waut a doctor with £800 ayear to tell them that, or to weaken responsi- bility : what they did want was good practical men to carry out the improvements which were necessary — men who had some knowledge and experience with regard to building, drainage, and other matters of tliat kind. It was useless to liave a number of medical otlicers writing the same reports of the same kind for their several districts. The sources of small- pox and fever were the same in all districts, and money which was spent merely in repeating theories was thrown away. What they wanted were good engineers, and lie hoped that one effect of the Act would be to provide them with such men. Tlie ultimate disposal of sewage was a question on which he had avoided expressing any opinion. He wished he had a field just outride any village, in a convenient situation to receive it ; but he should be very shy of constructing expensive filtration works, or apparatus for the disposal of liquid sewage. Mr. H. Neild (Manchester) said, those who occupied as he did, the position of chairmen of Sanitary Boards could not but feel that it was necessary to proceed with caution in respect to drainage. The question was, where drainage was to end ? and what was to be done wtth the sewage ? The public were contemplating the adoption of a drainage system of enormous extent, and, in the present position of agricul- turists, that question was a very serious one. In his own district they had had a gentleman from Whitehall to give them advice, but he left them more confused than he found them (laughter). That gentleman gave them a great deal of instruction as to what they were to do, but he did not tell them what was ulti- mately to be done with sewage. They had never found any difticnlty in compelling owners of house-property to comply with the requisitions made upon them as regarded privies and water supply. That question was a new one: it was now beginning to be appreciated ; and if he mistook not, in the coming Session of Parliament it would be a question of ques- tions. Mr. Rogers Field thought sufficient attention had not been paid to the importance of draining the sides of houses. He had tried the experiment of such draining at a cost of only two or three pounds, and the result was very satisfactory. [A Member: "How deep do you go ?"]. That depended on the nature of the soil. In that case the soil was a clay one, and he went down 4 feet, and put gravel instead of clay. He fully agreed with previous speakers, that earth- closets, would not answer in cottages, except where more atten- tion was bestowed on them than was likely to be generally found among the labouring population. Having adopted earth- closets he found that they were only attended to properly while he looked after them ; and he believed that, as a general rule, a well-managed privy system would be found preferable. In connection with the question of sewage, they must take into account what were called house slops. The usual course had been to drain these into a ditch, but any one who had really studied the question must see that that was often attended with great evils. He concurred in the opinion expressed that evening that occupiers of cottages should, as far as possible, be made to consume their own nuisances ; but the great q^iesiion was, how that was to be done ? !Je difTered from those who thought that if a system could not be carried out universally it should not be carried out at all, holding as he did, that the appliances should be adapted to varying circum- stances. He was in favour of sub-irrigation wherever it was applicable, and believed that if pipes were laid down properly, that system would involve the least expense. He had himself laid down a continuous bed of 3-inch pipes, so arranged that thev could easily be taken up, and the plan answered well. Mr. Tretuewy would ask the last speaker what he would do in cases in which the garden was in a low situation ? Mr. R. Field said, in the instances to which he had alluded that was not the case ; he had not maintained that the system was suitable for adoption in all cases. Mr. T. Duckham (Herefordshire) wished to say a word or two about those receptacles for filth — the horseponds, which in many cases received the refuse water of the adjacent houses and the manure from the fold yards. Some years ago two such ponds in his own neighbourhood continually led to cases of fever. When they came into his hands he cleansed one of them, and filled the other up, and afterwards there never was another case of fever. There was another pond which one could hardly go near without being reminded of its existence by bad smells but though frequent complaints were made the raaj;is- tra'es refused to interfere. He thought the sanitary authorities ought to direct their attention to those fruitful sources of disease, and the landlords to the use which might be made of the pure water which fell from the heavens in supplying stock with more wholesome water by spouting the farm build- ings, instead of allowing the fertilising properties of the manure to be washed into the ponds. MnjorDASiiwooD (Oxfordshire) strongly supported the views of the speakers who had found the earth -closet and box systems to be not applicable to labourers' cottages in the country, though both plans are useful under certain circumstances. Such closets were costly to the owners of property, required much supervision, and both plans were not adapted to the habits of the people. He would speak only as to cot- tages with gardens attached. With such cottages there is little difficulty as to the disposal of the excreta or slops, and from the results of much experience he as a rule would advise, for the sake of all parties interested, an adaptation of, and an improvement on, the old-fashioned privy ; the strong point of which improvement was this, that the vault was above and not below the ground level. This important point was arrived at by having a step of six inches rise at the entrance of the building, then a second step of eight inches, making a total rise of fourteen inches. This fourteen inches rise, together with the front of the seat (which is composed of bricks on edge), formed the vault, the bottom of which was raised three inches above the ground level. The whole of the inside of the vault was coated with cement, and a six-inch concrete floor ex- tended, say, four feet at the back. The vault was emptied with- out the least trouble through an archway opening made in the back wall. When the vault was empty this opening ought to be stopped up with sods or earth, and all the dry refuse of the cottage should be thrown and heaped up against it, so as to exclude the air as much as possible. This plan of privy had been much approved of by Dr. Child, the chief ofiicer of health for Oxfordsiiire. From his (Major Dashwood's) experience he could not advise for such cottages any drains from sinks, or underground drains for slops ; and he was now pulling up and doing away with such drains, which he had put to cottages about fifteen years back. These drains, although well trapped, brought vitiated air into the cottages, and from get- ting stopped up had injured the water in the wells. He would suggest the following hints for cottagers as to the disposal of slops and other refuse, and the management of privies. All slops should be thrown into a shallow hole made in the garden (not near to the cottage or well), and as the hole becomes full or offensive it should be filled up and another made. Slops should never be thrown into the privy vault, and the opening through which it is cleaned should be well closed, so as not to admit air, which hastens decomposition ; and vegetable and other dry refuse should be thrown against this opening to assist in excluding the air. The more frequently ashes and dry earth were thrown down through the seat into the vault, the freer from unpleasant smell would be the place. The Chairman, iu winding up the discussion, said he 438 THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. agreed with other speakers that tlie Club was deeply iQuel)ted to Mr. Howard for his excellent paper ; aud he congratulated those present, on the manner in which that siiliject had been ventilated. No one could doubt that it was necessary to look after the health of the coniRiunity, and some of the magnates of the land having been stricken down willi fever, it was pro- bable that the question would now occupy more attention than ever. The discussion of that evening should show the labourers of England that the Farmers' Club was not unmindful of their interests, and, not wishing them to freeze among the snows of Canada, was desirous of securing for them habita- tions which would promote their health and comfort at liome. Mr. J. HowAED then replied. After remarking that he was much gratified at the practical turn which the discussion had taken, he said that members who had differed from him must not suppose that he was unaware of the difficulties and the responsible nature of sanitary improvements. Experience had taught him the very contrary. Replying to some points raised by Mr. Hope lie (Mr. Howard) did not wish it to be understood that he considered the Sanitary Act of 1S72 per- fect. But he directed attention to the fact that it was the first iu stance of sanitary legislaiion which made it compulsory upon boards of guardians, and other local authorities, to put the existing Acts into motion. He be- lieved that great good had attended their operation thus far, and that they were calculated to confer still greater benefits upon the community (Hear, hear). With regard to the storage of water.the great question at issue appeared to be oue of expense. He him- self thought that the wants of the rural comra\mity might be very well supplied by means of the less-expensive system of open reservoirs, supposing that the water obtained from such sources were afterwards boiled and filtrated for drinking purposes. Further it was a moot point with sanitary engineers whether open or covered reservoirs were best. Trees should not be planted around open ones as the vegetable matter falling into them would pollute the water. With regard to the very conflicting opinions which had been expressed respecting the powers of the sanitary authorities in reference to over-crowding, he still adhered to the opinion which he had himself expressed, and in support quoted from the 29th and 30th Victoria. It must not be sup- posed, as some of the speakers seemed to imagine, that he was in favour of pushing sanitary measures to ex- tremes ; on the contrary, he had advocated moderation, and should be sorry to seethe stringent powers of the Acts pushed too far at once. He agreed in very much of what fell from Mr. Trethewy, but he did not concur in his preference for the old-fashioned privy system ; and he believed that gentleman would find very few sanitary inspectors or engineers who would concur in it. He also dissented from the opinion of Mr. Pell on sub-irrigation, that any system which was not universally applicable must be useless; in- deed, it was obvious that many good plans were only of service upon limited areas. Nor could he agree with the remaik of Mr. Pell, t'liat medical officers of health were useless. He thouglit special attention and study would be directed by these officers to the work so as to meet its requirements, and that in time we should have throughout the country a very valuable body of specially trained medical officers. Mr. Brown, of Tring, before he liad left had given him the following short account of his earth-closets : " My earth-closet forms one end of a shed, in the corner of which I keep a supply of sifted dry earth taken from the garden. A box is fixed from the closet-seat to the ceiling, sufficient to hold a fortnight's supply ; this is filled from an aperture open- ing to the shed. The earth is let down upon the deposit by means of an iron lever witli a handle, which is connected with a roller, and allows a limited quantity of earth to fall down precisely in the same manner as a farm drill acts. A brick cesspit is constructed behind the closet, which receives the de- posit, and is only emptied once in twelve months. Tlie closet is perfectly sweet, and the earth is renewed without any offen- sive smell ; it is put upon the meadow, and shows to a foot where it was placed." Mr. C. S. Read, M.P., in moving a vote of thanks to Mr. Howard for his excellent practical paper, alluding to some calls which had been made for himself, disclaimed any want of courtesy in not responding to them ; the reason being that on account of the official position which he occupied, he thought " discretion the better part of valour." The motion was seconded by Mr. Mechi, and carried unanimously. The meeting terminated with a vote of thanks to the Chairman. At a meeting of the Committee, on Monday, Noverabei 2, Dr. Voelcker was elected Chairman of the Farmers' Club for 1S75. ; THE SMITHFIBLD CLUB. A Council meeting was held at the Agricultural Hall on Wednesday, November 4th. Present — Colonel Loyd-Liudsay, V.C., M.P., President of the Club, in the chair; the Marquis of Exeter and the Duke of Bedford, Vice-presidents ; Messrs. H. Aylmer, C. Barnett, J. N.Beasley, E. Bowly, J. Druce, T. Duckham, W. Farthing, Braudreth Gibbs (Hon. Sec), J. Greetham, AV. Heath, T. Horley, C. Howard, J. Howard, J. W. James, W. Ladds, R.Leeds, C. S. Read, M.P.; W. Rigdeu, II. Webb, and J. Wilson. Authority was given to the hon. secretary to take any steps that may be necessary in reference to holding the Show this year in conformity with the Orders of the Privy Council. The committee was re-appointed to make the usual arrange- ments for disinfecting the cattle conveyances belonging to the persons sanctioned by the Club for conveying live stock to and from the Show. The Council prepared, in conformity with the bye-laws, the house list of IG members, from which the Council recom- mended the members to select 8 names to relace the 8 who retire by rotation and are not eligible for re-election for one year. The Council, in conformity with the vote of the last general meeting, appointed three scrutineers to examine the voting papers previous to the next general meeting. The following geutlemen were elected stewards of live stock : Mr. Henry Fookes, of Whitechurch, Blandford, to snccsed his brother, the late Mr. Wm. Fookes ; and Mr. T. C. Booth, of Warlaby, Northallerton. The death of Mr. Samuel Druce, a trustee of the Club, having been announced, theCouncil resolved that the hon. secretary write a letter of condolence to Mrs. Druce, and that Mr. Joseph Druce be elected a trustee in his place. Questions of qualification of live stock entries for the Show were decided. Arrangements were made for the use of pails for live stock during the Show, so as to prevent those used at other shows being brought into the building. The following gentlemen were elected members of the Club : J.Brown, J. Tarvill, W. Parham, A. F. Puckridge, E. P. Headly, J. S. Storr, T. Lucas, W. Stanford, A. M. Longman, E. W. Usher, W. Yates, R. Altenborough, W. R. Killick, H. Smith, jun., Colonel Luttrell, D. Mcintosh, W. Ball. The thanks of the meetin were voted to the President for his conduct in the chair. THE ROYAL AGRICULTURAL BENEVO- LENT INSTITUTION. At the meeting of the Council on Tuesday, November 2, Mr. C. S. Cantrell in the chair, Mr. .J. Druce proposed that the December meeting of the Council should henceforth be always held on the Tuesday in the Smitbfield show week, and not on the first Tuesday in the month. Mr. J. K. FowLEK called attention to certain complaints which had reached him from subscribers. The Secretary stated tiiat due replies had been given to any communications received from the local secretary at Boston. Mr. T. C. Scott protested against the consideration of the Council being given to mere reports. If there were no tangible facts to be brought forward in connection with such cases as the Lincolnshire one mentioned, he was opposed to entering on any discussion of such matters. Mr. T. C. Scott, of Moorgate-slreet, was nominated Chair- man of the Council for 1875. Mr. J. J. Mechi gave notice that he should move at the next meeting of the Council that " an increase of £100 per annum be made to the salary of the Secretary." THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 439 THE SHORTHORN HERD-BOOK AND SOCIETY. The Committee appointed at a general meeting of breeders of Shorthorns, held at Willis' Room on the 1st July last, met on Wednesday, November 3rd, at 3i, Charles-street, Berkeley- square, the house of Col. Kingscote, who took the chair- It was, after much consideration, resolved that the negotiation for purchase of Coaiei Herd Book from ]Mr. Strafford not iiaving been brought to a suc- cessful termination, the Committee would, as soon as practicable, issue a report of tbeir proceedings from the date of their appointment, and invite Sliorthorn breeders generally to join in the formation of a Society in accordance with the second resolution passed at the general meeting. [The resolu- tion here referred to ran thus : "Thatit is desirable to form a Society to consist of Shorthorn breeders and managers, with a limited managing committee, for the purpose of collecting and publisliing accurate information as to past and current pedigrees and sales, and promoting the general interest of Shorthorn breeders."] HIGHLAND AND AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY OF SCOTLAND. At the first monthly meeting of the directors for the season held on Wednesday, in their chambers, 3, George IV. Bridge, Edinburgh, the following resolutions were passed : 1. That the directors of the Highland and Agricultural Society desire uauimously to express the deep and sincere re- gret with which they have received the information of the death of their late chemist. Dr. Thomas Anderson. 2. That the Society liaviug in tiie minutes of tlie general meeting held on the IJih of June last recorded, upon Dr. Anderson's resignation of the office of chemist, their sense of the great importance of tiie services whicli he had rendered to tlie science of chemistry by his original researches, and to the Society's chemical department by the fidelity and accuracy of the work executed on its heiialf, it only remains for the ■directors to deplore the losi which they and the Society have DOW fuffered. 3. That tiie directors request the Secretary to transmit a copy of these resolutions to Mrs. Anderson, with their re- spectful condolence and sympathy, upon the occasion of the painful bereavement which Mrs. Anderson and her family have sustained. At the general meeting of the Society, held on 17th June last, it was, on the motion of Colonel Inues, of Learney, agreed to memorialise Government on the subject of agricul- tural education. The following is tiie memorial agreed to : To the Right Hon. the Lords of the Committee of Council on Education, the Memorial of the Highland and Agri- cultural Society of Scotland, incorporated by royal char- ters : Showeth, — That your memorialists beg respectfully to bring under your consideration the desirableness of affording to the working-classes of the country instruction in tfie sciences specially bearing on agriculture. That at present there are no schools for these classes in Scotland where such instruction can be obtained, though the importance of affording the means of such instruction can scarcely be exaggerated. That agriculture is a great national industry, through wliich the country is supplied with the chief articles of food, and above three millions of the population of^Great Britain ob- tain employment. That agriculture, to be successfully prosecuted, depends now on knowledge and training very different from what were formerly sntiieient. That in times past crops were raised and stock reared by the operation of very simple and primitive processes. In the present age the implements required by farmers depend on ingenious and complicated mechanical contrivances. Not only f jr the construction but for the management and working of these implemevits a knowledge of mechanics is required. The fertility of the soil needs to be stimulated by artificial com- pounds, which must be prepared with special reference to the nature both of soils and crops. The stock bred and fed on farms must obtain particular treatment, so as to ensure pro- duction of good meat in a short time and at small expense. All tiiese processes depend more or less on a knowledge of mechanics, chemistry, and physiology. The most important recent improvements in agriculture have been made by persons versed in these sciences. That it is therefore necessary, both for a successful prose- cution of the art and for its future development, that those of our population who wish to adopt agriculture as a profession should have an opportunity of obtaining instruetiou in the sciences bearing on agriculture. That it is understood to be the object of the Department of Science and Art to afford to the working classes intending to follow any important industry means of instruction in the sciences bearing on it. Thus persons intending to be en- gineers, manufacturers, buitders, miners, or mariners, are, iu the schools or classes encouraged by the aid of the Science and Art Department, enabled to obtain the instruction re- quired for those several arts and trades. Tliey are instructed not only in the abstract principles of tiie sciences applicable to the several industries, but also in their practical application. For instance, the engineer is taught mathematics, geometry, machine construction, and applied mechanics; the miner is taught geology, mineralogy, metallurgy, mechanics, and the principles of mining ; tlie mariner is taught f.itrouomy, physical geography, mathematics, navigation, and steam. That a similar arrangement is required for agriculture ; and your memorialists now respectfully and earnestly ask that it shall as soon as possible be sanctioned. That what has already been done for engineering, machine- making, ship-building, mining, navigation, and other great industries, your memorialists ask tj be done for the not less important industry of agriculture. That with this view your memorialists ask that the grants of the department shall be declared to cover instruction in chemistry, mechanics, physiology, botany, morpliology, steam, and other scientific subjects, when taught iu the abstract, in .<.o far as necessary for agriculture ; and also to cover instruc- tion given in the " principles of agriculture" as an applied science, and to place it in the same position as " machine con- struction," "applied meclianics," the "principles of mining," and "navigation," which are already included in the list of scieutifie arts towards instruction in which aid is given and in which examinations are carried out by the department. That your memorialists are happy to be able to state that there are many schools iu Scotland into which the instruction now referred to will be at once introduced, if the department accedes to the application made by your memoralists. May it therefore please your Lordships to take the premises into your favourable consideration, and your memorialists will ever pray. (Signed) Robt. A. B. Tod, Chairman. Edinburgh, lith July, 1874. To this memorial the following answer has been received : Science and Art Department, London, S.W., 15th August, 1874. Sir, — I am directed by the Lords of the Committee of Council of Education to inform you that their Lordships have had before them your letter of the Litli ultimo, forwarding a memorial from the Highland and Agricultural Society of Scotland, and . in reply I am to state that while their Lordships are disposed to accede to the request contained therein, it is too late now to include for this year the science of agriculture in the list of subjects towards instruction in which aid is granted by this department. The case is therefore reserved for future but early consideration. I am, however, at the same time, to point out that the branches of general sciences, such as cl.eniistry, mechanics, physiology, and botany, &c., which must form the foundation of any course of instiuction in agriculture, are al- ready aided, both in elementary schools and by the Science and Art Department. These subjects must to a certain extent be mastered by all students who intend to t;ike up the applied science of agriculture. I am to add that the best means of giving effect to the suggestions of the Highland and Agricul- tural Society will be carefully considered. — I am, sir, your obedient servant, (Signed) Norman Macleod. F. N. Meuzies, Esq. A letter was read 'from the Society of Arts, London, as to examinations in "the technology of agriculture." STIRLI^'G Show, 1873.— Two-year-old Polled Heifers : The 4 to THIl FARMER^S MAGAZINE. second and fourth premiums, awarded respectively to Mr. M'Combie, M.P., Tillyfour, for Fride of Alford, and to Sir Georjje Macpherson Grant of Baliiudalloch, Bart., for Eva, have been forfeited, owing to the animals having failed to produce calves within the specified time. The second premium has been transferred to tiie Earl of ¥ife, for He:"G contended that all the resolutions ought to be taken in the order in which they were placed by the Busi- ness Committee. Mr. T. WiLLSOX having moved, and Mr. T. J. Aukos seconded, the foregoing resolution, Lord Hamptox said he thought that, as a rule, the ar- rangements made by the Business Committee should be ttriclly adhered to, great inconvenience being involved in a contrary course. Sir G. jENKtxsoN, M.P., then formally moved that reso- lution No. 2 be taken next. Mr. D. Long seconded the amendment. On a show of hands there were 22 for the amendment and the same number against it. The Chairman having given his casting vote in favour of the amendment, declared it to be carried. Mr. Gardiner then moved, " That in the opinion of this Council all roads should be distinguished as ' First-class' and ' Second-class' roads respectively." He maintained that, under the existing system it was almost impossible to carry on'high- way legislation beneficially. There were two classes of roads in the rural districts ; one consisting of old highway roads, and other roads on which traffic was concentrated, and the other of roads which existed for the convenience of people living in the parish ; and they should, in his opinion, be clas- sified in the manner that he now proposed. Such a classi- fication would tend to enable them to obtain imperial assist- ance for the maintenance of the first class of roads. No one could suppose that the Legislature would ever consent to aid in the maintenance of the second class of roads, but for the first, which might legitimately be demanded. Sir G. Jenkinson, M.P., in seconding the resolution, said he thought the division of roads into two classes very im- portant, and in his opinion the disturnpiked roads ought to be included in the first class. Mr. BiDDELL believed that the proposed classification would tend to perpetuate existing evils. He was strongly of opinion that all roads ought to be under one management, and that the cost should be a district instead of a parochial matter. He was quite aware that the present highway enactments rs- quired material alterations (Hear, liear), and his observations depended partly upon a moaification of them. The Chairman said he wished to put it to the meeting at that stage of the proceedings whether they thought that the liaviug two classes of roads would necessarily involve the having two governments (Loud cries of " No, no"). Mr. WiLBRAiiAM Egerton, M.P., remarked that there vrere 850 local boards in the country — boards most of which had entered into various contracts, aud it was impossible to deal with that question properly without considering their position. Lord Hajipton thought they had better confine their at- tention to the question actually before them (Hear, hear). Mr. A. Pell, M.P., said it would almost appear as if a good road was to be a road along which a carriage might travel, and a bad road one which was only fit for a dung-cart (laughter). Mr. T. LucKHAM proposed an amendment to the eflect that there should be only one class of roads, basing his proposal chiefiy on the ground that having separate classes of roads would involve the necessity of having separate accounts. For want of uniformity of management he had himself, he remarked, as chairman of a highway board, every month to go through 72 sets of accounts instead of one. Mr. D. Long seconded the amendment. Mr. G. Whitaker- Wilson argued that there must be two classes of roads. It was necessary to have wider roads in the neighbourhood of a market town than elsewhere. Mr. Yelland supported the resolution. Jlr. Arkell observed that the public had as much right to travel over the parish roads as over others. He was in favour of having only one class. Mr. Maseen remarked' that one of the chief sources of expense was supervision, and if there were two classes of roada the expense of supervision must be doubled. Mr. LiPSCOMBE said it seemed to have been overlooked that turupike trusts were expiring all over the country — a fact which had a material bearing on the question under discussion. The greater part of the West Riding of Yorkshire, with which he was connected, was now under the Local Government Board, and they were not particularly anxious to take in hand expiring trusts. The Chairm.vn observed that thsy were not then on the question of turupike trusts (Hear, hear). Mr. LiSP(;oMBE 'proceeded to say that he was strongly iu favour of their maintaining their authority over parish roads, while he thouglit the cost of the main arterial roads ong'it not to fall entirely on the ratepayers. It was agaiu'^t all experience that bye-roads should be kept iu as good condi- tion as main or turnpike roads (" No, no"). Professor BuNi) said there always had been tvvo classes of roads iu this country ('' No, no"), and if they did not maintain such a division they would lose their claim upon the Govern- ment for assistance. Mr. Anthony observed that if there were two classe.s of roads there must be tvvo establishments to manage them. (" No, no"). Mr. Adkins supported the amendmeut. Loid Hampton said according to his view of the matter good bye-roads were quite as essential to the public conveni- ence as good highways. Then came the question — and it ap- peared to him that their function as a council was to deal with that question — in what way the object could be secured on the most economical principles. It struck him that if they had only one class of roads they would have greater unity and greater simplicity of management than could be secured in any other way. On the other hand, he thought that the hav- ing two classes of roads would almost of necessity involve the having two systems of management (" No, no"). At all events he was in favour of having only one class of roads, and iu his opinion that \yould prove the best for all con- cerned, Mr. Head, M.P. said, it appeared that all who were strongly in lavour of having only one class of roads had made up their minds in favour of higliway districts (" No"). If they had compulsory highway districts, and a general assess- ment as well, they might have but one class of roads. With- out a general assessment nothing could be more iniquitous than to perpetuate the present system of throwing the main- tenance of the arterial thoroughfares of the kingdom upon the parishes. Mr. ScoTSON thought there should be only one class of roads, with county management and a county rate to keep all the public roads in proper order, Mr. Storer, M.P., said he wasinfavour of having a system of highway districts combined with a small contribution from the Imperial Exchequer. Mr. Paget, M.P., thought that on the whole the balance of argument was in favour of having first and second-class roads, but he thought it should be clearly understood that that division could not involve a separate system of manage- ment. Sir G. Jenkinson, M.P., said his idea was that there should he one class of roads partly maintained by the Government and another class maintained by means of district rates. He had no desire to see two systems of management. Jlr. H. Neild said as regarded the question from wiiat sources the rofids were to be supported, he believed that any expectation of assistance fronr the Consolidated Fund was a forlorn hope (laughter). 3Ir. Jabez Turner said the question now seemed to be whether the adoption of tlie amendment would involve the giving up all idea of obtaining Government aid. It was not to be supposed that any government would grant a subvention for the common parochial highways of the country. In his opinion they must either abaudon the hope of getting assist- ance from the Government, or they muit adhere to tlie present natural subdivision of roads. Mr. A. Peel, M.P., said both the Chambers to which he be- longed in the Midland Counties had decided in favour of hav- THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 463 ing but oue class of roads, and on that point lie agreed witli them most thoroughly. All that had been said about having two classes of roads and only one management was illu- sory. Whether it was the Government or the magistrates who entrusted loual bodies with money tliey would accompany it with control. What lay behind the whole of that question was the desire of the Chamber to get a subsidy from the Go- vernment, and it seemed to be felt that they could get a sub- sidy for oue class of roads and not for another. Under the system contended for the roads would be divided into two classes, one the inaoadamised roads, the other the macadani- nable roads (laughter). Mr. TuRNEK (Kent) said they had just been told that the expectation cf getting assistance from the Government for roads was a forlorn hope, "Weil, let tlieiu have even a forlorn hope rather than no hope at all. If they had only one class of roads they would not have the least chance of obtaining Government aid; all their eflforts would end in disappoint- ment. A show of hands was then taken, and the result was that the amendment was rejected and the resolution adopted ; the numbers being for the amendment 23, for the resolu- tion 26. Mr. PoRD then proposed the third resolution, viz. : " That ' First-class' roads should comprise the present and former turnpikes, except those which, by diversion of traffic, have be- come disused as main roads, and include such highways as shall be determined to have become main thoroughfares ; and that ' Second-class' roads should consist of all other high- ways." This resolution having been seconded by Professor Bund, Sir G. Jenkinson, M.P., moved, as an amendment, "That 'First-class' roads should comprise all turnpike roads of which the trusts either have been or may hereafter be abolished, and that 'Second-class' roads should consist of all other liighways." Mr. D. Long seconded the amendment. Mr. Paget, Bi.P., thought it would be much better to leave the resolution as it was proposed. Mr. Biddell expressed his regret that many gentlemen present appeared to be so much influenced by the idea of their getting their hands into the Government purse. The real question before the Council vvas vrhat would be the best mode of maintaining highways in good condition. Mr. WiLBKAiiAM Egerton, M.P., said, as a member of the Parliamentary Committee on the turnpike roads, he had arrived at the conviction that unity of management was impossible under the present system, and would be so even if this adop- tion of highway districts were made compulsory. There were 1,172 miles of turnpike trusts now in the hands of local boards, and those local boards were so mixed up with the highway boards that the main roads of tiie country could not be pro- perly managed. He thought that first-class roads should be under county management or supervision, and second-class roads under local management. Mr. CoRRANCE considered a resolution like that proposed utterly useless. The whole difference of opinion among them seemed to turn on the question whether they were going to receive any assistance from the Government, and he had en- tirely failed to elicit a scrap of information on that subject (laughtei). After a few remarks from Capt. Craigie, the amendment was put and negatived. Capt. Craigie then proposed, as an amendment, to insert after the word " determined" " by the contributing authority." The amendment was seconded by Mr. Pell and objected to by several gentlemen on the ground that it anticipated questions involved in succeeding resolutions. It was ultimately rejected, after which the resolution was carried by 22 votes, giving a majority of 14. Mr. LirscojiBE moved the next resolution — viz., "That the funds for the maintenance of roads in the iirst-class should be provided from county or district rates, aided by contributions from imperial taxaMon, and that such contributions should be derived from a tax on different classes of vehicles, graduated in proportion to their wear of the roads." Mr. iSTRATTON seconded the resolution, and maintained that nothing could be more just than that carriages which were used on the roads should help to maintain them. Mr. Storr, M.P., hoped tlie Council would consider well ^lefore adopting the second part of thatresolutioji (Hear, hear). He would be happy to vote for tiie former part, but if the latter part were adopted agriculturists might, through their carts and waggons and their ploughing and thrashing-machines be exposed to the most grievous burdens. He moved that the latter part of the resolution be omitted. Mr. Gardiner seconded the amendment. Lord Hampton thought the resolution as it stood was open to most serious objection. It was perfectly competent to them to ask the Government for assistance with regard to the roads, but by laying down what the Government ought to do -with respect to a particular kind of taxation, they were travelling entirely out of their province, and putting themselves in the position of the Chancellor of the Exchequer (Hear, hear) . He hoped that for the sake of the credit of their proceedings the latter part of the resolution would be omitted. It was then agreed that the resolution should stop at the words I' imperial taxation," the latter part, relating to the tax on vehicles, being omitted. Sir G. Jenkinson, M.P., said, the horse duty having been thrown away, he wanted to prevent the carriage-duty from being also thrown away ; and he Jiad reason to believe that if the agricultural community asked with one voice that the carriage-duty might be granted in aid of the cost of turnpike roads, it would be done. He concluded by moving hs an addition to the second part of the resolution as abridged, " And that such contributions should be derived from the licenses now levied on carriages." Mr. Biddell having seconded the amendment, it was put and negatived, and after some further discussion the resolu- tion was carried by a large majority. Mr. Storer, M.P., then moved and Mr. Trask seconded the ibllowing resolution: "That roads in the second-class should be maintained out of parish or district rate".." Mr. Read, M.P., said he felt considerable difficulty as to how he should vote on that question. If they were to have highway districts let them be good ones, and they could not have good ones without a union rate. They must take away the management from the parish and place it in the hands of a board, and the rate should be spread over the wliole district. After some further discussion tlie resolution was adopted. Mr. WiLBRAiiAM Egerton, M.P., omitting the concluding part of the sixth and last resolution, proposed the following : " That the .system of highway districts should be made com- pulsory, but with material amendments in the existing Acts." [The words passed over were " and that both classes of roads should be under the management of highway boards, the first- class roads being subject to county inspection."] He observed that in Cheshire they had had experience of the compulsory system for the last ten years, and had found it to work remark- ably well. Mr. H. Neild, in seconding the resolution, spoke of great hardships to ratepayers in his own district in consequence of the adoption of highway districts not having been made com- pulsory. Mr. RussON moved as an amendment, "That the system of highway districts having increased the expenses of manage- ment without causing corresponding improvement in the roads, it is not desirable to make the Highway Acts of 1867 and 1874 compulsory throughout the country." In Worcestershire, he said, to which he belonged, the system now advocated had created great dissatisfaction, and similar advantages to those which it conferred had been obtained in other districts at much less expense. The Rev. E. C. Perry seconded the amendment, and said the experience of the system iu Staffordshire was similar to that just mentioned by Mr. Russon in speaking of Worcester- shire. Sir G. Jenkinson, M.P., observed that tlie result of returns for the districts where the system had been adopted was this — that iu 215 cases the report was satisfying and iu 107 cases doubtful, and only a very small number were adverse; while all acknowledged the improved condition of the roads. Mr. Read, M.P., thought the question was whether oue surveyor could properly look after 200 miles of road. If the waywardens could do the work of the surveyor the highway district system might answer exceedingly well (cheers). Lord Hampton said that at the Worcester quarter sessions he bad alvvajs advocated tiie adoption of the district system, because lie believed that the principles of the Act were sound He admitted that in some particulars the Act required amendment, and they now had sufiicient local know- 464 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. ledge to assist rarliamrnt in dealing with the question of amendment. Mr. CoKKAXCE said the conclusion which he drew from all that lie had heard at that meeting was tliat it was generally considered that they must give up the idea of Government as- sistance, and form districts so as to impose onerous obligations on the ratepayers. The Chairman observed that the number of votes of local Cliambers in favour of highway boards being made compulsory was IS out of 30. Mr. Gakdiker said that in Suffolk and Essex the general opinion was one of great dissatisfaction with the district system, on account of the increased expenditure. Mr. Stoker, M.P.. said he believed that highway districts had given general satisfaction, and that where the case was othrtwise the cause was the election by the ratepayers of in- (fficient waywardens or the appointment of an inefficient surveyor. Mr. "Whitaker- Wilson was contending, in opposition to Lord Hampton, that the district system had not worked well in Worcestershire, when Mr. CoRRAN'CE moved the adjournment of the debate, and Mr. Gardiner seconded the motion. Mr. Storer, M.?., remarked with animation that if such tactics were to be carried out, gentlemen who, like himself, had come a distance of two hundred miles to attend tliat meeting would not be likely to come there again. The Chairman said he must remind the meeting that the question had been before the Council for many months, and that as yet it had done notliiug. He then put the question that the debate be adjourned, and it was negatived by a large ma- jority. He then put tlie amendment. Only eleven liands were held up in favour of it, and it was declared to be lost. Mr. Read, M.P., said lie should demand a scrutiny. Lord Hampton said he hoped the question would be settled with perfectly good feeling. The minority should ueld to the majority. In no other way could the proceedings of such a body as that be carried on satisfactorily, and he was sure Mr. Read would be the last person to deny that. Mr. Read then withdrew his demand for a scrutiny. Sir G. Jenkinson, M.P., moved as an amendment the ad- dition to the resolution of the following words, which con- pautBj as it stood in the Agenda : " And that both classes of roads should be under the management of highway boards." This amendment having been seconded by Mr. Carpenter, was submitted to ihe meeting and negatived, the numbers being 13 for and 14 against it. The original resolution was afterwards adopted by a large majority — 23 to 6 ; and this being the last resolution relating to highways the subject dropped. It was then agreed that the appointment of a Minister of Agriculture should form the chief subject of discussion at the December meeting, and that at the February meeting the Council should " consider the reports and summary schedules on agricultural customs presented by the Committee on Unex- liausted Improvements, and also proposals of tliat committee towards legislation." On the motion of Mr. Read, M.P., it was agreed that the amendments required to be made in the Highway Acts should be discussed at the annual meeting. The proceedings then terminated with a vote of thanks to the Chairman. ■ TO THE editor OF THE MARK LANE EXPRESS. Sir, — I have reason to believe that when Lord Hamp- ton expressed surprise at my request that the division upon Compulsory Highway Boards should be tested by a scru- tiny, his Lordship was not aware of the power of the Dis- trict Chambers to record their votes by proxy. If the voting power of the minority had been thus tested, our small baud of eleven would have been found to be far more important than it appeared to be. If I mistake not, the dele- gates from Worcester, Warwick, Stafford, Lincoln, East Suffolk, and Norfolk voted in the minority, and they alone were entitled to thirty-nine votes. This will show that I had good reason for making the request, which — at the late period of a long meeting, and in deference to the re- quest of Lord Hampton — I did not press upon the Chamber. Yours, Farmers' Club, Nov. 4. Clare Sewell Read. THE SCOTTISH CHAMBER OF AGRICULTURE. At the annual general meeting, held in the Hall of the Chamber, Edinburgh, Mr. A. MacneelCaibd the retiring president, in the chair, the following counties', reports were given in : Aberdeenshire. — The meeting of the Aberdeen members was held in the Corn Exchange, Aberdeen, on Eriday. Mr. M'Combie presided, and was re-elected chairman and county representative. Mr. Barclay, M.P., Copland ; Mill, of Ardletlien ; M'Donald factor, Cluuy; and Adamson, Balquharu, were appointed the County Committee for next year' EoREARSiiiRE. — A meeting of the members resident in Forfarshire was held in Brechin on Tuesday of last week — Mr. Robert L. Mustard, chairman, presiding. The meeting appointed the following members of the Counties Committee for the ensuing year : Mr. Alexander Anderson, Berryhill ; Mr. James Young, Fardhouse ; Mr. William Goodlet, Bolshan ; Mr. William Smith, West Drums; Mr. J. M. Nicoll, Littleton ; Mr. Wm. Aruot, Mains of Glamis ; Mr. Wm. Smith being representative member. The meeting were of opinion that the bill introduced by Lord Huntly, so far as contistent with the resolution of the Chamber, be approved of, but inasmuch as it fall short in many essential points, recommend the Chamber to enter into coramunic&tion with his Lordship on the subject, and remit to a committee for that purpose. The meeting recommend the Chamber to disapprove of the draught bill of Sir Robert Anstruther on hypothec, and petition Par- liament in favour of Mr. Vans Agnew's bill for total repeal. Roxburghshire. — This body held a meeting in the com- mittee room ot the Corn Exchange, Kelso, on Friday. Tlie members present were — Mr. Clay, Kerchcbters ; Mr. Ballingall, Clairilaw ; Mr. Munro, Fairnington ; Mr. Riddell, Hundalee ; Mr. Main, Kelso; Mr. Roberton, Lad>rig, &c. Mr. Riddell submitted tlie following motion : " That the above committee are of opinion that the land-tenancy laws ought to receive the urgent attention of tlie Scottish Chamber ot Agr-culture, and that the Chamber should endeavour to ha\c these laws altered so as to give complete accuracy to capital invested by tenant- farmers. Tlie committee are also of opinion that success much depends on advocating compensation to the cwuers of laud, whose tenants may have deteriorated their farms, thereby lessening their letting or market value." After a few com- ments on the resolution, it was unaniously agreed to. Mr. Riddell and Mr. Scott, Spylaw, were deputed to bring this resolution before the counties committee meeting. AyRSUiRE. — This meeting was held on the 3rd instant at Ayr. 5Ir. Young, Kilkenzie, presii-'ed, and was re-elected repre- sentative member. The following resolution was adopted : " As there is a growirg dissatisfaction amongst farmers as regards the operation of the land-tenancy laws, njore especially to the want of provision being made whereby compensation should be giveu for all permanent improvements and unexhausted manures, we are of opinion tliat the Chambers should take whatever steps they consider best to accomplish that object." Kincardineshire. — A meeting of the members of the Chamber of Agriculture resident in tlie county of Kincardine was held on Monday in the Corn Exchange, Lauiencekirk — Mr. George Lsrgie, Haulkertcn Mains, in the chair. Mr. W. Alexander, Bart., ot Haulkerton, was elected represeutatire member; and Messrs. David Mitchell, Buruton ; Alex. Taylor, Cushnie ; and Willitim Burness, Bedford; n, embers of com- mittee. It WHS thereafter proposed and unanimously rei-olved : " That this meeting urge the Chamber (while steadily using all efforts to obtain repeal of the Law of Hypothec, aud such moditicatiou oMlie Game-laws as may be attainable) to cou- ceutiate its chief efforts upon obtaining from I'arliaiLeni a measure to legalise Tenant-Right to a similar extent as wts granted by a lormer Government to the tenant-farmers in Ireland". The Secretary (Mr. Curror) read the Treasurer's statement for last year, which showed that the hinds in bank amounted to £521 19s., that tiie Chamber had property of the valu« of £139 18s., and tliat there were JETW ol arrears of sub- scriptions. On the recommendation of the Counties Committee the followin.; gentlemen were elected office-bearers ot the Chamber for the ensuing year : rresideot — 31r. David Cunninghame, Chapelton, Ardrossan. Vice-Presidents — Messrs. Joseph THE FARMER'S MAZGAINE. 465 Harper, Snowdon, and Riddcll, of Ilundalfe. New Directors — Messrs. A. IMacneel-Caird, R. M. Cunningliara, Shields, Ayr ; Betliune, of Blebo ; II. Scot Skirving, Drein ; and James Joliustcne, Moffatt. Messrs. Henry Adanisou, Alford, and Jolin M'C'ulloch, Glenhead, Stranraer, were elected new members. Mr. Macneel-Caied delivered Ids retiring presidential address. He said : The political events of tlie past year have prevented any progress being made towards the legislative settlement of agricultural questions. The time at which the new Government came into office is a sufficient excuse for their not having dealt with tliese questions in the late session of farliament. But that cause of delay is now at an end. There are men in the Government capable of dealing, and I believe willing to deal, with these questions, in a wise spirit. But it seems to be supposed that they have colleagues pulling the other way. And it may be that we shall thus have the spectacle of a Government paralysed by internal dilTerences on questions of vital importance to the country. But I trust that it will not be so- And it is our part to show that the claims we support are reasonable, in order to strengthen the hands of those who are friendly to a reason- able solution of them. I propose on this occasion to refer specially to a subject which is of interest in England as well as in Scotland. As to compen'^ation for tenants' improve- ments, the ordiaary rules of our law on such subjects are not unfounded in reason. If au artist paints a valuable picture on anotlier man's canvas, the principal s-ubject — the picture — be- longs to the artist, but he must pay for the canvas. If a man, in good faith, builds a house on land which turns out not to be his, tlie house goes to the owner of the principal subject — the land — but as a general rule, he must pay for ttie benefit lie has got by the building. The greatest of Scottish lawyers taught, nearly 200 years ago, that if a man, even in bad faith, built on another's land, the owner was bound to repay hint, to the extent to which he took profit by the work. He adopted tliis dictum of a great Roman jurist, " Natural justice sufTereth not that we enrich ourselves with the spoil of others." And al- though in mere modern mtimes a wrongdoer's relief h; s not been sustained to that extent, the very judges who refused him that relief suggested that even a wrongdoer might have right to remove the buildings. But what we have to complain of is that if the man who builds or executes improvements has the misfortune to be a tenant-farmer, he is made au exception to all tliese rules. His good faith counts for nothing. The law, as it stands now, gives him no right to compensation. It refuses to him even the right to take away his materials, though it might perhaps give that right, as I have said, to a wrongdoer, whose possession vias usurped or unlawful, and would certainly give equitable compensation to any person, not a tenant, who, with good faith, had made th« same im- provement on another's land. That relief would, nf course, be limited to the extent to which the owner profited, the very limit which we propose to attach to a tenant's claim. The improvements created by a tenant's skill, capital, and industry are in substance and in justice, though not in law, the property of the tenant who makes them. No doubt they are attached to or combined (■ nd in the case of drains and manures inextricably combined) with hnd which belongs to another. But the just solution of that state of things is not that the one right should swallow up the other without compensation, but that the owner of the land who takes such improvements should pay for them, according to the benefit which he appro- priates ; and that the tenant-farmer should thus cease to be opprissed by an exceptional law. That law lobs the tenant of his property when he is evicted without compensation. And this species of injustice is, probably, productive of much greater injury to tlie community tkan even a robbery by vio- lence, because it operates on a much wider scale ; and by the fear of subjecting tenants' property to confiscation, spreads dis- trust everywhere, and defers great numbers of tenants from making the expenditure which is necessary for due cultivation and for the unrestricted growth of food. It also warns off much free capital which would naturally seek profitable in- vestment in agriculture, if the law did not make it artificially insecure. Thus the injustice operates with great severity on the occupier, while the loss to the country from restricted pro- duction is incalculable. But if, by making the municipal law just, and allowing natural laws to act, capital were made safe 10 come freely to the enrichment of the soil, and the develop- ment of agriculture, a country peopled and wealthy as this is — so many mouths to be supplied, and such abundant means to supply them, if jou took away hindrances— this country, I say, would rapidly exhibit such a change, and such an expan- sion of growth, as is almost inconceivable to those who have not attended to the results which may be attained by the ap- plication of capital to land, with freedom and judgment. And who would lose by it? No doubt, under the present system, a landlord may now and then snatch au advantage by unex- pectedly appropriating an occupier's improvements without compensating him. But that, tliough it rankles deep when it occurs, is necessarily exceptional. Most men beware of sub- jecting themselves to it. Every flagrant instance of it makes them more wary. Still cultivation would be worse, and tenants' improvements more rare than they are, if landowners generally were to use to the full the advantage which the law- gives them. Tne main action of the law is really as a deter- rent. Landowners as a body are thus, in truth, great sufferers by this and by every thing tliat hinders the enrichment of the soil that belongs to them. Their rents are just a share of the profit derived from tlie land. The greater the production and profits, the greater in the long run will inevitably be the share going to the landlord. None gains more surely than the land- owner by the general prosperity of the country. From 1857 to 1870 the land rental of Scotland rose steadily 29 per cent. —£5,032,000 in 1857, £7,191',000 in 1870. If I had the figures down to the present time I feel convinced one-third at least has been added on the average in that short time to the annual rent of land over Scotland as a result of the general prosperity. And what could more increase the prosperity of the country, and hy consequence the prosperity of the land- owner, than a vast increase to the productiveness of the soil in whose profits he must inevitably share ? The more also you take away disadvantages which oppress the occupier, and the more you enable him to profit treely by the use of his means and industry, the more will he find it necessary, and the more will he be willing, to enlarge the landlord's proportion of profit, when, even so enlarged, it leaves a better profit to him- self. If I might venture to put into words what 1 believe to be the prevailing opinion of the best tenant-farmers in Scot- land, it is not the rent that troubles them ; give them just security, do away with the artificial hindrauces which hamper their industry, and I don't think they will quarrel with the rent, or cou- plain that it advances with the progress of eman- cipated agriculture, and the general prosperity of the country which that progress will promote. 15ut I must deprecate the use in regard to this question of the vague phrase " Tenant- Right." It is a phrase of very uncertain meaning, even in Ireland, where it originated. In Ulster it means a teuant's right by custom to sell the goodwill of his farm though he has no lease ; and not only may have made no improvement on the farm, but may have brought it to the most miserable and exhausted condition. I need not say here that that in no degree resembles our present claim. The incautious use of such a loose phrase has occasionally enabled a bold antagonist to escape without much discredit under cover of a general declaration against "Tenant-Right," who might perhaps have been ashamed to avow in plain words, or even to himself, the desire to confiscate the improvements made by his tenants witiiout giving auy allowance for them. The complaint is not that another tenant gels the farm over the head of an old tenant, not that the old tenant might not have liad it by pay- ing more rent than he chose to give, but that the landlord pockets a rent increased by reason of the old tenant's improve- ments, and evicts him without giving him a penny lor the improvements, even where they cannot be denied. When a controversy of that kind arises, it may be fitly tested by this simple question ; Was the evicted tenant fairly paid for his unexhauvted improvements, or is the landlord (by availing lumself of the unjust state of the law) enjoying a rent enhanced hy these improvements, without having paid for them ? If you apply that test it will disperse much of the haze whicli arises iu such cases from contradictions and controversy. Ihe claim which this Chamber makes is that the law on this subject should be made consistent with natural equity, so that the tenant shall have right on removal to payment lor his im- provements and unexhausted manures, ascertained when necessary by qualified valuers or arbitrators. Skilled men of practical experience would examine the evidence of expenditure (as one, but by no means the only check), they would also see the actual condition of the farm, inspect the works, and ascertain their efficiency, their fitness for the 468 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. holding, their actual results and durali'ily, snd would be quite able ia practice to arrive at just conclusions. And I may say, using a fev\' words on the subject v»hich liave already been in circulatiou among ourselves, that in practice these compensa- tions will in general not be paid by tlie landlord, but will be ascertained and settled between the outgoing and the incoming tenant. Tlie landlord can always, and will usually, make stipu- lations to that effect in letting his farm to a new tenant, unless he sees that he can get a better rent hy paying the compensa- tion himself. The measure of compensation ought never to exceed the letting value added to the farm by the tenant's im- provements as at the date of his removal, taking into account all deteriorations which can be brought against him. Tlie un- stinted expenditure in manures, which a just system of com- pensation will encourage the tenant to make, and to continue till the close of his occupation, will be a new security to the landlord (of which he cannot be deprived) for payment of the rent, and fulfilment of the tenant's obligations. It is of high public policy that a state of the law should be amended, which, by causing insecurity, hinders the full use of capital to increase the productiveness ot the soil. To amend that state of the lavp in a wise spirit, with due consideration of all the interests involved, will result in a vast enlargement of growth, especially of food, and, by consequence, will add im- mensely to the annual income and wealth of the country, to the fund for llie employment of labour, to the prosperity of nunufactures and commerce, to the comfort and contentment of tlie people, and thus to the security of property, and the gene- ral welfare of the nation. There is a great work here which Ins to be done — it may be now, it may be after a time, not a long time. The claims of justice and policy united cannot be disregarded long. But be it soon or be it later, the statesman who having the power shall also have the will and courage to release agriculture from the trammels of unwise laws shall in- scribe as their memorial in the hearts and history of the people, that they added to the productive resources of their country, and to the comforts of the people, not merely by millions, cer- tainly by twenties of millions ; and if they leave no flaw in the security thus given to the culivator, it may be event- ually by hundreds of millions a-year. They can now in a time of calm trim the vessel with deliberation and safety. Who so rash as counsel that they should wait for the hurricane, at the risk of bringing the overstrained masts by the board, when they loose command of the ship ? As to tlie law of arbi- tration, tills chamber having recorded its opinion that when the parties cannot agree arbitration is the fittest mode of set- tling the just amount of compensation, this leads me to say a few words on an allied subject which, so far as 1 am aware, lias not yet been publicly discussed. The law of arbitration in Scotla'nd is in some respects in a most unsatisfactory state. One point I may illustrate by a case which arises almost every day. A landlord and tenant entering into a lease, say for nineteen years, agree in the lease that all differences which may arise between them siiall be settled by arbitration, but tliat agreement is of no legal effect unless they have actually named the arbitrator. And in a contract of such endurance, how can they beforehand name an arbitrator with any confi- dence that when his services are required he shall be alive, or witliin reach, or qualified, or willing to act? This rule is, moreover, so absolute that even if the parties, to escape Irom the diliiculy, agree in designating an arbitrator as the holder for the time of a public office, such as the Sheriff of the county, the Dean of the faculty of Advocates, or the Lord Advocate, the law will set the arbitration aside. Nay, though the par- ties have effectually named their man, so as to create a bind- ing and perfect arbitration, if lie should die, or permanently leave the country, or become disqualified, or decline to accept, the law will do nothing in furtherance of their agreement to arbitrate. In the face of that agreement eitiier can drag the otlier into Court, ana insist on having their differences settled by litigation. Well, but let us suppose the parties have got a step further — they have not only agreed to settle their differ- ences by arbitration, and effectually named their men — two men mutually chosen, with power to choose an umpire or oversman, and these men have accepted and entered on their duties, but have unfortunately disagreed on the questions in dispute, and can't agree on an umpire (a very common case), the wliole thing tumbles down like a castle of cards, and once more the parties must fight out their disputes in the Courts of Law. In short, there are as many pitfalls in the Scottish Law of Arbitration as if they had been contrived to create work for courts and lawyers. And these pitfalls stand in the way not only of landlords and tenants, but of every person in Scotland who seeks to avoid litigation by leaving differences to the decision of neutral men. One remedy is not far to seek. Where parties have agreed to have questions settled by arbitra- tion, that agreement should be enforceable, and the Courts should be empowered to name the arbitrators or umpire where the parties fail to do so. That remedy already exists in England. There are also great facilities given by special statutes for settling railway compensations and similar claims by a simple method of arbitration ; and these, with some revisal, might advantageously be made of more general application. I liave thought it right to refer to this subject in connection with the leading object of this address, because it is obvious that no system of agricultural compensation could be satisfactorily worked without a simpler and better system of arbitration than we at present possess in Scotland. This is far from being a farmers' question alone. Mercantile men, and indeed all classes of the community, are affected by it, and 1 cannot doubt that if you see fit to take any steps for the amendment of that Law of Arbitration you will find very general support in it. Mr. D. CuNNiNGHAME (Uliapeltou), the new president, then took the chair, and intimated that the first subject fixed for dis- cussion was the laud tenancy laws in relation to the question of compensation for unexhausted manures and permanent im- provements. Mr. Geokge Hope (BorJIands) said it was many years since he came to the conclusion that compensation to tenants for unexhausted manures was only a matter of simple justice when they were compelled to leave their holdings, lie had no doubt that laud might acquire increased value without tenants having done much for them from the making of roads, &c. But that was not wliat was referred to by tenants. It was when tenants limed their land, and filled it full of manures, tlieeftects of which remained in the ground, that they should receive com- pensation. This was a tiling in which not only farmers, but the whole country were interested. If they held their hand in applying manures to the land for three or four years, it would take double that time before they could get the larm into the full cropping state again. They would get neither the same quantity nor quality of grain for several years to come. They had got a custom in Lincolnshire which he would like to see made legal all over the country — the payment for unexhausted artificial manures, manures from extraneous feeding stuffs, and permanent improvements, such as drains. Some ten or filteen years ago he had the pleasure of driving witlithe lion.Nisbet Hamilton fora very longdistance through the county of Lincoln- shire, and he did not think tliatinfrom fifteen to twenty miles he saw a single acre under the average. All the land was in really good cultivation, and there was not a single farm indi- cating that tiie lease was coming to a close, as was not unfre- quently, and perhaps not unjustly, seen in this country. He had held these opinions for many years ; he had arrived at them when lie was a tenant-farmer, and now that he was a landlord, he must say that it was of the greatest importance that the law should he changed. Mr. RiDDELL (Hundalee, Jedburgh) said that the laud te- nancy laws should be considered as at least afl'ecting the inte- rests of two parties — viz., the owners and the occupiers of land, and any change contemplated ought to be with a view of benefiting the parties referred to, and through them conferring a boon on the nation at large. Although many landed pro- prietors reaped great advantage from the money invested by their tenants' skill, industry, and general good management, yet, on the other hand, it could not be denied that proprietors were often unfortunate in making choice of tenants, men who allowed houses, fences, roads, drains, and the land itself to fall into decay, vastly diminishing its letting value. He did not hesitate to say that any change they might contemplate in the land tenancy laws ought to provide by law for compensation to proprietors whose laud might be deteriorated in consequence of bad management during a tenant's occupancy. Then, and not till then, could they as tenant-farmers with consistency go iu for compensation for uuexhausted improvements, permanent or otherwise. As the law stood at present, there was little in- ducemeut to farm well, as it was ouly those farms that were highly cultivated which induced and warranted a rise of rent ; indeed, some of our largest and money-making farmers allowed their farms to ran out several years before the expiry of the lease, and then went to the factor or landlord, telling him the farm won't grow certain descriptions of crops without THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 467 lime, and uuitss they got a renewal of the lease the loss must be considerable. Compensation at the end of a lease for all unexhausted manures, &o., would go far to prevent all this ; and if compensation were given to the proprietors from tenants who had deteriorated the land during tlie currency of their leases, it would render it unnecessary for proprietors to trade on the enterprise, skill, industry, and capital of tiiose farmers who had increased the letting or market value of their farms — a practice prevailing to a considerable extent at the present time. Indeed, such alteration of the land laws as re- ferred to would naturally lead to abetter understanding between landlord and tenant, and also to identity of interest, a want of which in too many cases was much to be deplored. Mr. John M'Culloch (Glenhead, Stranraer) said that the great difficulty in securing reform of the present law with re- gard to unexhausted improvements was tlie outcry that the landlords would suffer. He thought it could easily be made plain that the landlords would benefit more than anybody else, the community next, aud the tcuant-farmers least of all, for even at the furtiiest tliey only wished a part of the money back which they had laid out. It had been said that there would be difficulty in carrying out any system of compensation, but he maintained that a schedule attached to the lease might meet the case, and if not, then legislation would become necessaiy. They siiould also approach the subject in a temperate spirit, and give coin]iensation to landlords for deterioration, while they in turn gave compensation for unexhausted manures and improvements. Mr. Wm. Sjiitu (West Drums, Brechin) said that this question belonged to a group which had been so thoroughly ventilated, not ouly in the Chamber, but throughout the country, that uot mucli new light could be thrown upon it. They were, however, indebted to their late president for much information aud aia in the explication ot the subject. All they asked was that farmers should be able to reap the unex- hausted product of their own capital and industry if they were required to leave their farms. Lord Huutly and other noble- men and gentlemen, who were willing to aid them in this movement, deserved every support and encouragement from them. Mr. George Hope said he was perfectly satisfied that Mr. Macneel-Caird had not overstated the immense increase of land produce which would result from the granting of cora- pensatiou to tenants for unexhausted manures and improve- ments. On the motion of Mr. Hope, tlie following resolution was adopted : " That this meeting cordially approves of the broad general principles expressed in Mr. Macneel-Caird's address in relation to compensation for unexhausted improvements by tenants on leaving their occupations, aud its belief in tlie general benefit which would arise therefrom, as already ex- pressed in previous resolutions of this Chamber." The next subject for discussion was a remit from the Perth meeting as to the Marquis of IJ unity's Laud Tenancy Bill. Mr. T. M. NicoLL (Littleton, Kirriemuir) said it was within the knowledge of many ot the members of the Cham- ber that Lord Huntly was at present engaged in recasting his bill, aud he thought the discussion should be postponed till the meeting of the Chamber in April, vihen the complete bill would be before them. The discussion was accordingly adjourned till April. Mr. Macnef.l-Caird proposed that the Chamber should record its thauks to Mr. Vans Agnew, M.P., for his action in introducing his Hypothec Abolition Bill. There was a pro- viso in that bill which he (Mr. Macueel-Caird) thought, however, disfigured it, viz., the clause which provided that its operation sliould apply only to new contracts. If the bill were passed in that shape there would still remain the slur upon the credit of farmers under existing leases which arose from the present law, and, unfortunately, the evil would not be confined to them, because manure merchants and mer- cantile men generally could uot be expected to find out whether leases were current at tlie time of the passing of the Act, and there would be in their minds a lurking possibility of the Law of Hypothec taking ctt'ect on all farmers for 19 years to come. There was not the least necessity for the clause, and he therefore thought that the Chamber should direct Mr. Vans Agnew's particular attention to that clause, and ask iiis reconsideration of it. Captain Betuune (Blebo) thought it would endanger the success of the measure if tlie Chamber insisted on regard not being had to existing leases. This clause had always been embraced iu Mr. Carnegie's bill. Mr. M'CuLLOcir thought success would be unworthy of the name it the bill was passed in its present form. He seconded Mr. Macneel-Caird's motion. Mr. Smith (West Drums) said that the bill would have enough to do to pass in its present form, an. I they should do nothing which was likely to lead to its being thrown out, as he imagined Mr. Caird's proposal would do. It was agreed to divide Mr. Macueel-Caird's proposal into two separate motions— 1. That the Chamber thank Mr. Vans Agnew for the efi"orts he had made to secure the abolition of the Law of Hypothec, and express the hope that he would con- tinue them iu the next session of Parliament. 2. That there are objections in principle to the proviso limiting the action of the bill to new contracts, aud the Chamber request Mr. Vans Agnew to reconsider it. The first was carried nem. con., and on a division as between the second aud an amendment by Captain Bethuue that the recommendation was uncalled for, the motion was carried by a majority of 22 to 8. The annual dinner of the members of the Chamber took place in the Royal British Hotel, Wr. Cunningham (Chapel- ton, Ardrossan) in the chair; and Mr. Shepherd (Gleghornie) acted as croupier. Mr. Hope, of Bordiands, gave " The Houses of Parliament." In the House of Commons the agriculturists only required to press those important questions which had iu the earlier part of the day engaged their atten- tion upon the House iu order to secure their being successfully dealt with. Mr. Siddell (Hundalee) proposed the " Scottish Chamber of Agriculture." He adverted briefly to the good results which were likely to follow from the discussions that took place among members of the Chamber, and showed how these were calculated to bring about the elucidation of the truth. The Croupier gave "The Highland Society." It was because discussions such as those which occurred in the Chamber were without the pale of the Highland Society, that the Chamber had been first instituted. A " ROYAL" REPORT.— The Bedford meeting is fully described iu reports oa the live-stock (very poor, as they gene- rally are), and on the implements and implement trials (excellent as they invariably are). The reports of the live- stock class at our annual shows are very rarely well done. There are not many writers capable of describing cattle, or of criticising or commending in a discriminating way the awards of judges. Aud the editor of the Journal has not got hold apparently, this year at any rate, of the proper deputy. There certainly are writers who liave this power, and our weekly agricultural papers, who secure their services, are better worth reading on this subject, in the very week of the show, than is the Jour)ial of the Society, issued months after its occurrence. — The Agricultural Gazelle. The Bedford meeting is reported on at length. Mr. G. P. Smith occupies over one hundred pages with the implements, aud appears to have acquitted himself most creditably. It is to be regretted that no one equally qualified has been employed to report upon the live-stock de- partment. The excellent article, a year or two since, by Mr. Henry Corbet, might, we think with advantage, have been followed up, so that the leading features of each gathering might be placed on record. As it is, the reports of the differ- ent juries afford very meagre information. — The Field. [It should be added, in justice to the Editor of an otherwise so good number of the Society's Journal, that he must not be held answerable for this stock report, which was taken out of his hands.] TESTIMONIAL TO MR. DENT DENT.— Soon after the defeat of Mr. Dent for Scarborough a subscription list was opened and a sura of money raised, which it was agreed should be embodied in a massive silver candelabrum. It was also re- solved to present Mr. Dent with an address acknowledging his services, and expressive of the regret of the electors that his connection witk the borougli had been severed. A meeting of the subscribers was held in Scarborough, when the cande- labrum w'as exhibited, and the address laid upon the table to receive the sisjiiatures of the subscribers. 463 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. TENANT S' IMPROVEMENTS. At the meetiiiff of the Inverness farmers' Society, held in Inverness, Mr. Matthew Elliot in the chair, the following subject was discussed : What are tenants' improvements ? and hovir can sucli improvements, as well as unexhausted manures, be estimated, so as to form a reasonable claim by a tenant at the termination of his lease P Mr. MoLLisoN, factor (Dochfour), said the subject, no doubt, was important ; and he was sorry that he was only prepared to make a few remarks upon it. lie had not written a paper, and indeed had hardly time to think over it with a view to the present discussion. It was a (juestiou surrounded with difficulty and complexify ; but that was one reason for discussing it in a society of this kind. None but practical men were capable of discussing it properly. A good deal had been spoken and written about it during the last year or two, but chiefly by those who knew notliing at all on the subject; while those who did know, and might have thrown consider- able light upon it, and assisted to clear away difficulties, had not opened their mouths. He was not aware of a single sen- tence having been spoken, in a sensible, practical way, for the expositii,n and settlement of this question. They knew, how- ever, that the difficulty was not a myth. There were such things as tenants' improvements and unexhausted manures. Compare the country to-day with what it was fifty or twenty- five years ago. The cliange was very marked. They had finer fields and more of them, finer crops and more of them, finer stock, finer implements, better fences, better buildings ; and undoubtedly the bulk of the iraproveraeuts had been effected by the tenant-farmers of this country. Tiie weight of part of it, perhaps, fell upon the proprietors — of erecting the buildings, for instance ; but he was convinced that three- fourths, or at any rate one-half, had fallen upon flie fanner. No wonder, then, the question had arisen. Are farmers not to be paid for this? The farmers thought tiiey ought to be paid for it ; mercantile men, who had generally a keen appreciation of value for value, agreed that they ought to be paid for it ; and he thought even proprietors were bound to admit that, where a tenant had executed a solid, permanent improvement upon the subject he occupied, he ought to be paid for it. He did not believe any proprietor would dare to hold up his lace and say otherwise. But then the difficulty arose. How were they to be paid ? How were they to estimate a reasonable claim at the end of a lease ? It was easy to arrive at tliis point but not so easy to proceed further. The best way, lie thought, of treating the subject would be to suppose a good broad general case, such as might occur on any farm ; and in the next place, to look at a similar case as it would appear under the legislation suggested for the farmer's protection. First, then, suppose that a good fair subject was let, but in bad order — the land wet, and fences and buildings insufficient. The landlord would make no improvrnients, but told the tenant to take it and make the most of it. The rent say was £150. The tenant, being a good, industrious, practical man, sets to fencing and draining the land ; then the stock increases, and he requires better houses ; and at the termination of his lease he finds that he has improved the place very much. He goes for a renewal of the lease to the proprietor, who says he likes him very well, and asks what rise of rent he will give ? The tenant, who knows the subject vtry well, and does not want to quit the farm, but at the same time wishes to make a living out of it, offers. The offer is not accepted, and the farni is advertised. The new tenant gives £250 (or it — an advance of 75 per cent. ; and the old tenant says to the pro- prietor, " Surely you are not going to pocket all this hand- some profit ! Are you not going to pay me for ihe improve- ments? You know I was not bound to improve ; and are you going to turn me off without making any allowanced" 'ihe proprietor agrees ; and they propose to submit the thing to arbitration. 15ut the lease is put in, as a matter of fairness, to allow the arbiters to understand the whole case. He ob- served Mr. Mundell listening very carefully. Would Mr. ]\Iundell act as arbiter for the tenant ? Mr. Mundell : Either for proprietor or tenant, so far as you have gone. Mr. MoLLisoN : Well, he would put the case of the proprietor meantime. Leave unexhausted manureslor the pre- sent out of the question. The arbiter for the proprietor says — " Look at the lease just as showing the position of affairs. You get the farm at a fair rent, value for what it was at the time, and eo word of improvement. You made these improve- ments, and no dcubtthey must liave paid you. The very fact of the farm letting at a rise of 75 per cent, is strong presump- tive evidence that you were paid for them ;" and the proprietor may say — " If I had known that you were going to make me pay, I would have expected a bigger rent." Of course, it was quite within the power of both parties to have arranged that the tenant was to make improvements, and to be paid for what was exhausted of tiiein at the end of the lease. In the supposed case no such arrangement had been made ; and now he should- iketo wait and liear what Mr. Mundell would have to urge on Ibelmlf of the tenant ? Mr. Mu^'DELL said ]\Ir. Mollison had made a really able and practical speech so far as it went, and lie had little or nothing, to say in reply to it. It vias an important question to ask How have the tenant farmers of Scotland come to farm their lands as they have done ? These men had made all the arable land in the country what it was. For himwlf, he had improved a place on the west coast, and even put up stone dykes, for which he did not receive a penny of compensation. He ad- mitted the improvements paid him, or he would not have made them : at the same time he had improved other people's pro- perty, and got nothing for it. If factors could manage to put a tenant in a place that needed improvement they could do it, but it was unfair that the tenant should have no recom- pense. Mr. Mollison had explained his own view of the case justly. Mr. Ross (Brecknish) thought Mr. Mollison's supposed cast shirked the real difficulties ofthe question. He had selected a case which was, of all others, admitted the fairest for the tenant as tiie law at present stood. Where a lease of nineteen years had been allowed to reach its natural termination, the tenant certainly could not make out a very strong claim for compensa- tion, as he would, if an ordinarily prudent man, have taken pretty good care to execute improvements which would repay him before the end of the lease. So far they could agree with Mr. MoUisou, except in the case of buildings whicli the tenart might have found it necessary to erect shortly before the expiry of his lease, and these he should either be paid for or allowed to remove. But all tenants did not enjoy the protection of leates, nor did all leases come to their natural end. Suppose the lease was broken from ill-health, death, or bankruptcy, or that the tenant had sunk so much of his capital in improve- ments that he had not sufficient left to carry on with. Was it not a iiardship, indeed really unjust, that the law should allow the landlord to step in and reap the benefit of those improve- ments, to the exclusion of the tenant or his representatives? It was for such cases, and for the vastly more important case of England, where few leases exist, that a change in the law was so urgently called for. Mr.MoUison had also avoided touching on what most people regarded as tlie greatest weakness of our lease systtm — namely, the practice of exhausting the land to- wards the end of the lease. So generally is this the case, that the supporters of tiirse compensation measures say, a Scotch faim during a nineteen years lease is in good productive condi- tion for only about half that time — the first five years being spent in raising its fertility, the next nine or ten in keeping it in that state and the remaining years in impoverishing it. Perhaps by employing artificial manures, an outgoing tenant need not leave very much capital in the shape of unexhausted manures, but turely this was a very serious loss fo the nation at large. At the same time, he must confess that, looking at the great differences of opinion existing both among scientific and practical men as to the permanent qualities of manures, he was not very hopeful of a satisfactory settlement of the question being arrived at lor many years to come. Mr. Aniiekson (Lochdhu) said that in his day he had been as great an improver of land as any tenant in the North of Scotland. He had improved upwards of 300 acres in a few years. He was not bound to take in all that land, but he drained and trenced it at his own expense, and he was quite well aware that the proprietor on the other hand was not bound to recompense him lor his outlay. If he had made a bargain THE FARMER'S MAGAZlKE. 469 he would hn.ve been paid for the improvements. It just came, to this, that they must abide l)y their bargains. Of course, it' a tenant required to erect buildings, he should either be paid for them, or allowed to take them away. But if a man en- tered on improvements, he did so for his own benefit, and he required to keep liis farm in good order the last year, otherwise he would not be paid such a price for his crop, &c. Let them go into their leases in a proper and right way, and let there be no row at the end of a lease between proprietor and tenant. Mr. Mollison had spoken about a reference to arbritation. That was a most difficult matter. A tenant must have seen witii his own eyes that the laud would pay him, otherwise he would not undertake improvements. In his case the farm was advertised over his head, and now another tenant occupied the and lie reclaimed. Mr. IIendrie (Castlelieather) thouglit that they should consider their leases well before they signed them. lie had been as foolish as others — very glad to get hold of a farm in any way. And if any one came to ask him about this farm or that, he just said — "Don't be so blind as I was; consider well before you put your name to the lease." He had done a great deal to improve his farm, but he was thankful to say that he had a good landlord and factor, who encouraged him iu it. Mr. Scott (Parks of Inches) thought that tenants' improve- ments were easily described. Draining, fencing, building, in short, whatever added to the value of the soil, formed an im- provement, and he thought it was simple enough for tvo practical men, near neighbours, to estimate the value of such improvements, as of everyliiing else. Bailie Simpson thougiit thai at least a tenant who added to the farm buildings should get something for it at the close of the lease. Mr, James Armott (Ness Bank) thought the only prac- tical cure was a reduction of rents, as it is well known that, as a general rule, they were at present too high. Farmers could then afford to make improvements, and run the risk of getting compensation at the end of the lease. They could also afford to sell their stock on more reasonable terms. Mr. Mackintosh (Scatraig) described the improvements he was himself carrying on, and observed that a man should give no more for his farm tiian he could see his way to clear- ing out of it. OlFer for the farm eitiier with a view to im- provements or without such a view. Tenants, he observed, sometimes added to the buildings, but sometimes also allowed them to fall out of repair. Mr. Fraser (Balloch) thought that a tenant, in taking a farm, was bound to consider whether any improvements he proposed to erect would pay him. As a rule, tenants in this part of the country had considered the subject, and had ex- ecuted the improvements very much to their profit. His ex- perience was, that it was not in the old-made farms tenants lived comfortably, but on farms where there was land to im- prove. In the memorable instance of the Fentonharns, he was told that Mr. Hope not only imoroved the land, but actually covered acres and acres of it with new soil ; and there was a man who made a fortune on farming. Again, it was the greatest mistake in the world to say that a man profited himself by exhausting the land at the end of his lease ; it was in the closing years of his lease that he got paid for the work of all the previous years. But no doubt the practice of the country was to farm so as to exhaust the land towards the end of the lease, and this might tend to injure the produce of the country. There was no such difficulty as was alleged in es- timating unexhausted manures. A certain quantity, say of farmyard manure or bonemeal, was put into the soil. It was quite well known that one crop did not exhaust them, and surely the amount still remaining could, for the following crops, be estimated by respectable neighbours. Mr. Mollison shortly replied. He thought more might have been said on the tenants' view of the question, and he agreed that no farmer could farm well without leaving un- exhausted manures in the soil. But, on the other hand, the tenant under his lease was bound to consume straw, and chafi', and turnips, and to return these to the land. Then the pro- prietor might ask why, in common sense and fairness, the tenant should ask to he repaid for them ? Bones or bone- meal the tenant would apply in the early part or middle of his lease ; but they were all chemists enough to know that they would not get the full return from these by applying them at the close of the lease. The tenant could apply manures for the hist two or three years that would leave precious little in the soil. As regards farmyard manure, bis mouth was shut. Mr. Fraser (Balloch) : Is there not a difference between straw used with artificial food and straw used without artificial food ? Mr. Mollison thought artificial feeding made the manure more active, and the return was quicker. Turning to the question of proposed legislation, Mr. Mollison argued that many of the proposals would do more harm than good. One tenant might be for box-feeding, another for stall-feeding, another for irrigation ; and if the proprietor was bound to pay for their " unexhausted improvements," the lear of losing money would not operate to the same extent as a check upon the tenant, lie quoted a paragraph from a speech by Mr. Arkwright, M.l'. for Derbyshire, who was in favour of giving compensation for unexhausted improvements, but " these im- provements should be made with tlie consent of the landlord." What was this but throwiug dust in people's eyes? Plainly the matter must come to be one of contract after all, the landlord sayiug, " I will not do the improvements myself, but I will pay you for doiug them." This Tvas the practical course and he iield that tenants could execute improvements at one- third of what the proprietor could do. The Chairman said that the majority of the speakers had been in favour of bargains with regard to improvements, and this was also his own view. The passing of a measure to make compensation for uuexliausted improvements compulsory would give endless work to tlie law courts. IRISH TENANT-RIGHT. A Tenant-Right demonstration has been held in the Town Hall, Ballymoney, which was crowded to excess with tenant- farmers, Mr. Thomas M'Elderry in the chair. The Chairman having referred to the importance of the land question and the gallant fight which the tenant-farmers made at the lastelection to return Mr. Wilson, who was certain to be returned at the next election, called upon Mr. S. C. M'Elroy to read an address to that gentleman. Mr. M'Elroy having read the address, and Mr. Wilson having suitably acknowledged the compliment paid him, Professor Smyth, M P. (county Londonderry), mo?ed the first resolution, as follows : That, four years' experience of the Land Act having proved its inadequacy in some respects, and especially for the revival and preservation of the Ulster custom, i*. is, where it has been impaired,deRirablethat an amendment bill be introduced, which shall not only legalise ths custom, as granting to the tenant by prescriptive right and public equity a secure tenure and freedom of conduct in selling his interest, hut provide facilities for amicable adjustment of rent at intervals in conformity with the principals and unrestricted operation of the custom. Mr. John Megan seconded the resolution, which was unani- mously passed. The following resolutions were subsequently adopted ; Second — That it is the duty of the Conservative Government, as the avowed protector of the rights of property, to introduce a bill calculated to preserve to the tenant-farmers of Ulster their just inheritance, and thus establiih on a durable basis those social and agricultural relatioiiS, the existence of which is invariably conductive to civil peace and material prosperity. Third — That, as the progress of the Teuant-Itight cause de- pends on the farmers themselves, they should persevere with all zeal in their efforts to obtain a satisfactory settlement, and when opportunity arises to elect representatives pledged to advocate and support their interests in Parliament. Fourth — That the thanks of this meeting are hereby given to the landlords who, before and after the passing of the Land Act, have upheld the Tenant-Kight custom upon their estates, and to such landlords in Antrim we express our special obliga- tions. Fifth— That the 3rd, 4th, and 7th sections of the Land Act having granted to tlie tenantry of the south and west of Ireland two important elements of the Ulster custom, it appears o this meeting that the right of voluntary sale of tlie propeity granted by those sections should be conceded by the Legislature, and such provisions made as would give them full security against capricious eviction and rack-renting, thus extending to them the benefit of the Ulster custom in its essence and practice. 470 THE FAR^EER'S MxVGAZINE. MR, THOMPSOI^r, OF KIRBY HALL." The journals and records of the Royal Agricultural Society of England would indeed be incomplete without some sufficient memoir of the late Sir Harry Steijhcn Meysey Thompson, better known to the agricultural world as !^Ir. Thompson, of Kirby Hall, in Yorkshire. A certain coldness of manner and seeming chill reserve appeared to dull the warmth of a tender heart and a dis- position not disincliued to a sense of genial humour. Nay, even some, who little knew the man, misconstrued unobtrusive modesty, and fancied that they detected a savour of haughtiness. There must have been rare qualities of mind to enable him, notwithstanding marked drawbacks of manner, to achieve, as a practical man of business, ,a singular success. Of the two great English Agricultural Societies he was a ruling spirit. Under his guidance the North-Eastern Railway Company became one of the greatest and most successful of commercial undertakings ; and, moreover, he founded and guided the ever-extending United Companies Railway Association. Mr. Thompson's is a fine example of an honourable and unselfish ambition, by unsparing energy overcoming such drawbacks as natural shyness and reserve, and, perhaps, an invincible tendeucy towards exceeding minuteness. With tact to guide, with gentle wisdom to draw, and with sufficient power of expression to give effect to both, he was a patient man, of clear perception that went straight to his point ; passionately fond of work — overwork — he delighted in setting wrong 'to rights, and establishiug order where he found utter confusion. Always ready to help others to bear their burdens, he kept many irons iu the fire, and yet allowed none to cool. A careful gleaner of opinion, consequently a good listener, he was never in a fuss or hurry, nor irritable nor boastful. The key to the knowledge of others was in iiis hands, for in early life he knew himself and recognised the essentially practical bent of his own taleut. And " passing show," which he de- tested, he had above all things an ever-abiding sense of over-ruling Providence. Let Mr. Thompson's exact posi- tion be understood at the outset. He gained honours at college, but was never a literary man. He made a dive into the ocean of science, aud brought up one scieutilie pearl of great price, of which more hereaftc, but he was never a man of science. Science aud literature he re- garded but only as they conduced to his practical objects. In agriculture his position was between the pi'ofessor of science and the man of practice — he stood mic'ivay — a beneficeut interpreter. " The first attempts of the farmer and philosopher to run in couples were not encouraging" (these are Mr. Thompson's own words) ; " they conversed in unknown tongues." Heir to a fine estate, Harry Stephen Thompson was born at Newby Park, in York- shire, on the 11th of August, 1809. A clever, shy child, apt for work, he could read and sura at three, and knew something of Latin grammar at five. Being a delicate boy, his father sensibly thought that the absorption of knowledge was belter than the now fashionable cram, so on his pony the boy trotted down every day to t'ne par- sonage, his pockets as well as his memory bulging with the familiar Virgil and Horace — never forgetting, how- ever, to visit by the way to and fro a certaiu stock-yard, where he kept rat-traps constantly going; and a neigh- bouring barn-wall told of his characteristic energy, for it did many a tale unfold. As a boy, and through life, he was a fine shot and fond of shooting. When eighteeu he was sent to a private tutor near London, to prepare for the university ; and during two years he made so much progress that, in regard to an academical career, great expectations were raised. He entered at Trinity College, Cambridge, iu 1829, at the age of twenty, and found time for ^entomological study under Darwin ; but the allure- ments of society and the attractions of the tennis-court were, as concerned studies, sad disturbing influences. He graduated, nevertheless, in honours in 1833 — senioi" optime in the mathemathical tripos. Before settling down at Kirby, and, according to his father's wishes, entering upon the rural life of an English country gentleman, the youug Thompson travelled on the Continent and in Scotland, aud spent a summer in the South of France to perfect himself in Erench. In his foreign correspondence we pass over much naire descrip- tion, and not a little sunny humour. He says we can live in Holland for £10 a month, and buy there a good- looking riding-horse for £9 or £12. He swam across the Rhine where it was a quarter of a mile broad, the current carrying him dovi'n three-quarters of a mile ; the time fifteen minutes. At Rome he had fever, and, with his horse, a bad fall. From Toulouse, in 1834, he writes that there is much agreeable society ; as it is one of the retreats of the ancienne noblesse. He is working hard at French : all sorts of game abound, and he asks for his English gun. He was introduced to a great French agri- culturist, Baron Malaret — a practical man. The shrewd old fellow keeps exact accoutits ; credits his woiking bul- locks with their hours of work, and charges them for their food. The Baron is an example of what improved agri- culture may do in France : chiefly by introducing the English system, he has tripled the value of the family estate. But Mr. Thompson says, " there is no fear of my becoming restless and unable to settle down to my duties as a future English country gentleman ; the more I know of foreign manners and institutions, the more I appreciate home : there is no place like hoine." The Yorkshire Agricultural Society — the legitimate oflspring of the Society of Scotch Improvers, 1723, and of the Highland aud xVgricultural Society — was born iu 1837, the first year of the happy reign of the Queeu. The circumstances attending the birth of the Society are thus recorded by one who was then present. A country house party assembled at Kilnwick-Percy, at that time the home of the late Mr. Deuison ; after dinner, Mr. Thompson remarked iu reference to the subject of conver- sation— some local cattle shows, " Don't you think we could form a Y'^orkshire Agricultural Society movable from place to place throughout the county ?" The next morning a small meeting was held at Pocklingtou — Thompson rapidly and clearly sketched a scheme — he obtained the aid of Lord Spencer and of others ; the thing was done. Curiously it was at first contended that tenant farmers and farming landlords could never compete on equal terms. Thompson vigorously opposed this nar- now view, and there was no restriction. The leadership of this important and most flourishing Society was vir- tually in Mr. Thompson's hands, until the year 1870, when the pressure of other work, aud perhaps failing health, to the regret of all, led to his virtual retirement. We should here refer to that which all his frieods will recognise as very characteristic. Mr. Thompson had an agreeable theory that " all truly British Institutions com- mence with a dinner," which sociable theory he much delighted to extend aud to carry into practice both at Kirby and at his town house in Mausfield-street. His hospitalities— and he was truly hospitable — he liked to make conductive to his practical views. The Royal Agricultural Society of England was founded THE FARMER'S ]\IAGAZINE, 471 111 183S. Two cuiiueiit men, uow no more, liave ia a remarkable degree influenced the fortunes of this national society — Mr. Pusy and Mr. Thompson. The agricultural life of both these distinguished men may find a fitting monument in its journals. Mr. Pusey edited the Journal from the first, and until his lamented and premature decease in 1855, when its conduct was confided to Mr. Thompson, who more or less is responsible for its management for a like period of seventeen busy years. A man of high character and sober judgment, Mr. Pusey was at once a jjhilosophcr aud a man of business ; a man in advance of his age. Practice with science, the motto of the Society, his characteristic and oft-repeated words, even he thought more desirable Ihau probable. If to the unreflecting these two pregnant words appear trite, the pondering student sees in them the key to the agriculture of all future time. It is fit, it is essential to draw some parallel, to suggest some contrast between men so united in kindred labours in the same cause, so distinguished in the same agricultural field of action. Indeed, in 1861, Mr. Thompson in his " Essay on Progress," virtually invites some such comparison. ^Mr. Pusey and Mr. Thompson were in no sense rivals : they were altogether complementary the one to the other. "When the dying man relinquished the lamp of agricultural progress to the hands of another, it was with the full assurance that it would be safely and rapidly carried forward on the path that he himself had indicated from the first and carefully mapped. Pusy was a natural leader of men, endowed by nature with that indescribable essence called genius. Thompson, on the other hand, was a man of highly cultivated talent. AVhat the one grasped by fiasli of instinct, the other followed patiently and laboriously with true British pluck and painstaking. Pusey boldly led the way by the force of dominating character ; irresistibly Thompson pushed men on by the gentle and modest sug- gestion of superior knowledge of every subject and ques- tion in issue. Mr. Thompson was essentially a practical man. The good seed practically sown by those good kusbandmen. Sir John Sinclair, Arthur Young, and others, bore good fruit in the shape of practical agricul- tural tours undertaken by Mr. Thompson, accompanied by Denisou, afterwards Speaker, and subsequently Lord Ossington, Mr. Lawes, and othecs. Most of the farms worth seeing in Great Britain were visited, and much valuable information gained. At this time also, the writings of Baron Liebig directed attention to the practical appli- cation of chemical science ; Mr. Thompson's thoughts turned towards the clienaistry of agriculture. In an ancient corner of the ancient city of York, where old beetle-browed houses with quaint carved beams overhang the narrow foot-pavement, there lived, in the summer of 1845, a chemist and druggist of capacity, a shy and retiring, but able and exact member of the Society of Friends — his seal a pestle and mortar, under- neath the letters J. S. — Joseph Spence. Tie was also managing partner in the York glass-v.'orks. The Thomp- sons of Kirby were old customers. Spence knew nothing of agriculture but what young Thompson told him ; and often he came to and fro. An agricultural laboratory was fitted up-stairs. Thompson suggested, amongst others, an experiment — the power of the soil to absorb aud as- similate ammonia. A glass tube to be afterwards filled was made at the glass-works : it represented down to the drain a four-foot section of earth. Spence, much in- terested, worked early and late : he ground down turf to fill the tube. The result of the percolation of a solu- tion of ammonia fairly startled them all : it was not filtration, but a new chemical action. Spence threw up his hands in astonishment, and called up Holden his assistant to see the unexpected result. Friend Spence ! did it at that moment occur to thy practical mind that mere money might be made of this discovery r No, not in the coin of this work-a-day world, but it is most negotiable in the universe of science. The eleventh volume of the Jo«;-/^«^ contains Mr. Thompson's modest account of his discovery : the paper is a model of lucid exposition. The guiding idea Hashed upon him when obseiwing the escape from manure heaps of quantities of ammonia. In the words, specially addressed to us, of a great living authority, " It is remarkable that this slight experiment contains the germ of what I should consider to be one of the most important, if not the most im- portant of all the scientific investigations connected with the practice of agriculture." ilr. Pusey, President for the second time, was prevented from taking his place at Lincoln. The sixteenth volume of the Journal for the year 1855 coutains the record of his early aud lamented death at the age of fifty-four years ; and so ends what we may venture to call the Pusey period of the Royal Agricultural Society. The Journal of the Society was now conducted by Jlr. Thompson. The new editor added half-yearly valuable statistical tables. The Report to the Council contains the suggestive phrase, " international agriculture." In the next year, 1857, there is a curious reference to American public judging in the ring, to " prevent favouritism." There appeared in 1SG4 Mr. Thompson's exhaustive paper on the " Progress of the Royal Agricultural Society." If reprinted, this might well be entitled au Agricultural Handy-book. As president of the Society, the presidential address deli- vered by Mr. Thompson at the end of year 1866 comes as a fine close to the history of his long literary career in con- nection with the agriculture of England, as represented by the Royal Agricultural Society. He taught the lesson of his life — Press on ! As with agriculture, so with railways : in the one case there were old prejudices to be fought, old customs to be uprooted ; so iu the other there was culpable mismanagement, if not fraud ; there was wrong to be righted, there was confusion to be reduced to order, and tiierefore, with characteristic energy and moral courage, Mr. Thompson, being a practical man, advanced to a practical attack. It is always the case, the cruel demou of greedy speculation was devouring indiscriminately the substance of the innocent and of the guilty — un- worldly clergymen, widows and orphans, wei-e sufferers as well as the mixed mob of gamblers — the dirty, the fashion- able, and the vulgar. He moved the resolution which re- moved the late Jlr. Hudson from office ; the immediate object being to rescue the property of the shareholders by introducing sound aud honest management, and by restoring to rival companies the blessings of peace. This labour at first was well described to us as " night and day work !" Mr. Thompson was not actuated by any motives of self-interest. Owing to his mistrust and by his insti- gation the greater part of the family interest had been re- moved from the suspected undertakings. As chair- man of the North Eastern Railway Company, Mr. Thompson saw the good seed he had sown bring forth good fruit most abuudantly : that which he undertook to lift from its state of abject desolation, became under his hands one of the most highly appreciated and greatest of English commercial undertakings. He proposed and organised, in 1852, a Railway Companies Association, of which he was chairman ; but after several years it was torn asunder by the battle of the gauges aud long territorial contests. A a second attempt, however, which, like all truly British institutions, commenced with the characteristic dinner, was more successful, and has not only introduced moderate and give-and-take feeling between the companies, but also between the companies aud the great public it is their interest to serve. He continued until almost the last to be chairman of this association. Suffice it here further 47-2 The FARMER'S MAGAZINE. to say that when tlie railway history of Great Brittain shall be written, the railway-direction career of Jlr. Thompsoa may well fill many an instructive page, and every line will convey the impression of a policy pre- eniineutly successful, because it was thoroughly honest, and admirably straightforward. The political career, so much desired in early life, came, but it came late : at the a^e of 50, in the year 1859, Mr. Thompson entered Par- liament as Member for Whitby. Seven years afterwards he lost his seat in consequence of a dramatic but unfor- tunate circumstance, for which in no way whatever was he responsible — during the election contest, his opponent, Mr. George Hudson, was arrested by his creditois. The originator of improvement schemes, the fouuder of the water works, Mr. Thompson did much to encourage art in the jet trade, and he will long be remembered at AVhitby as a public benefactor. At the next election, in 1868, he was brought forward for the Eastern Division of the West Riding of Yorkshire ; after a severe contest he was defeated by a narrow majority. The Parliamen- tary position Mr. Thompson speedily gained has been estimated and summed up by two thoroughly qualified political friends, to whom \Te are specially indebted. By no means an ardent politician, the cool administration of Lord Palmerstou was not calculated to add fuel to any political tire that may have smouldered. On agricultural and railway subjects Mr. Thompson, from his conspicuous knowledge and accuracy, was soon recognised as an authority. As a speaker, with a mastery of detail, he v; as always clear aud definite: he never attempted ora- torical flights — his was a thoroughly House of Commons style, full, ready, and conversationally flowing. If in early life his inclinations had not been diverted, had he entered Parliament whilst yet his dispositions and habits were plastic, he would, no doubt, have risen high in the Government of the country. Coldness aud reserve of manner were serious drawbacks in electioneering, more th»n compensated, however, by the good sense and tact which often induced compliance, and never failed to com- mand respect. " Home ! there is no place like hoa.e." We have followed Mr. Thompson from boyhood to youth ; we have traced with care the more important highways of his public life ; it remains for us just to indicate the lesser paths of duty, which he trod with so much benefit to his family, his neighbours, and the public, and it is as pleasant as it is essential to the completeness of our bio- graphical sketch, to conclude with a rapid glance at the home life at Kirby. We have seen that the two great agricultural societies were founded in the years 1837-8 ; two years afterwards Mr. Thompson established his home farm, and devoted much time, and his surplus income, in extending the use of machinery, and in otherwise improving agriculture, and in promoting education, as well upon his own estate as in the management of the diocesan traiuing-coUeges of York and llipon — and this at a time when those educa- tional institutions had few sup])orters and scanty means. Afterwards middle-class education interested him ; and during many busy years he found time on Sundays to visit his farm to teach the farm lads. We may not do more thau refer to his happy marriage in IS^S, and, to the numerous and promising family by which he was subsequently blessed. Charity, melting chaiity, claimed from his busy life many a well-spent hour. From 1845, for 20 years he acted as chairman of the House Com- mittee of that admirable institution, the York County Hospital, and during his chairmanship the new hospital was built. The railway directorsliip, as we have seen, commenced in 1849. He succeeded at his father's death to the family estates in 1853 ; and six years afterwards Parliamentary business for a time somewhat interrupted home duties. Early in life an acting justice of the North and East Riding of Yorkshire, in 1865 he served the office of High Sheriff of that great county ; and, as we know, in 1867 he was President of the Royal Agricultural Society. We fancy we gather in iSIr. Thompson's writings much that is autobiograpliical — he sketches a man so hungering for knowledge, that he is never satisfied until he could ascertain all the causes of failure. " The management of an imaginary farm" savours greatly of his own experience. Mr. Robson, hale and hearty, his bailiff from the very first, is still at Kirby to speak much of his late master and little of himself : lie can tell of the exceed- ing miuuteness that regarded every minute detail of the estate, of the household, and of the farm — no turnip sown, no sheep bought without his master's knowledge. As a landlord, Mr. Thompson is autobiographical when he says, " there exist personal ties which, if rudely severed, would be most inadequately replaced by additional rent." Safe tenants may crop as they please — simplify agreements, and regard good stocking and thorough manuring. Give plenty of nstiee ; so combine freedom for the incoming with justice to the outgoing tenant. Routine, he adds, cannot be broken through without a pang, which never, however, survives a favourable balance-sheet. In the somewhat flat country of the Vale of Ouse Kirby Hall is pleasantly situated, exactly in the centre of a circle of park and other lands, which have been cultivated and improved by Mr. Tliompson. The garden-front com- mands a distant view of the grey towers of York Minster. To the north you may see wonderfully-improved park land — in June yellow with the buttercup. At no great distance, embowered in trees, there is the ancient parish church. Westward, following the home circle of cultiva- tion, the new approach, crossing a serpentine lake, leads through a grass-tield, on deep hazel loam, to the Kirby home-farm. Begiauing with 250 acres, this home-farm in 1867 had grown to 670 acres, of which 300 acres was grass. At first he maintained a pure herd of Shorthorns, but this was sold in 1848 ; he always, however, had a well-bred bull. The sheep, of the Leicester breed, were also carefully selected. There is here a characteristic of the Kirby estate — a covered foldyard. In every direction may be traced the hand of the improver — he was no mere paper farmer — drainage, which he thoroughly understood, marling, enlarged fields. Towards the south point on the home circle of cultivation there is the new home-farm of 340 acres with its covered foldyard. Many of the buildings, with corrugated tiles, are only just finished. Some land here is poor clay, much cracked ; two large fields have been recently laid down to permanent grass : thanks to artificial mauure, the ground is pretty well covered, and there is clover. Still the general impression is, that on this bad land the good grasses say to the farmer, "Wait a bit." There is close by an old pasture, of which its late improver was very proud — a triumph of skill in old grass cultivation. Previously the quaint old tenant of this " deafish" field used to say : "The grass came a week afore Barnaby fair ! — June 22nd — and went a week after !" Diffi;ulty has been experienced in getting good grass-seed — some has been lately got from the hay crop of Wensley Dale, some from the neighbourhood of Knaresborough. Circling eastwards, and entering the park from the east, there is a fine field of grass, laid down thirty years ago ; thirty-two Irish cattle bought in May were in June feeding here, and many cribs about told of other food than grass. Passing by experimental grass- plots, interesting only as showing the interest to the last which the careful experimenter took in his latest practical study, we regain the front park — our point of original departure — to admire, beneath the well-cared-for plantations, 40 fat bullocks, as sleek, fat, aud restful as a rich pasture and rich artificial food could possibly make THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 47:! them. Stay^to complete our landscape wc want a fore- grouad lijjure. It is more thau imagiuatiou that enables us to dash him in — an ancient tenaat and neighbour — he will tell us that Sir Harry was respected and iuflueutial elsewhere ; but, in addition, around Kirby Hall he was mucli and generally beloved. Health failed — gradually, very gradually. A sojourn in the South of France. A welcome return to Kirby. More illness, and, as before, tended with domestic devotion. Honours came. The Queen, by the hand of her Minister, conferred an hereditary distinction. Commercial gratitude was showu in the shape of a magnificent testimonial. Political addresses gratefully acknowledged. But as he stood on its brink, and looked steadily into the black gulf — probably next to a mental onlook — ^an humble onlook — towards the promised land — he fouad comfort in the doubting retro- spect of G5 years of a busy, a well-spent, and an uusellish life, which, on the 17th May, IS?"!, death came to cbse in peace. — From Lord Cathcart's admirable Paper in the Royal Agricultural Society's Journal. MAIDSTONE FARMERS' CLUB. INDIGESTION IN THE HORSE. At a meefia^, at the Star Hotel, Maidstone, on Thursday, Professor Pritchard, V.S., was announced to deliver an address on "Indigestion in horses, aud the effect of the cliange upon their system on passing from dry to green food ;" Mr. T. B. Lovett, president of the Club, in the chair, Mr. II. Waterman the vice-cluiirman. Mr. Pritchard said he thought it would be well first of all to make a few general remarks about tlie digestive process, and to describe the change wliicli food undergoes from its reception in the mouth of the animal, and its passage through llie intestines, and to point out the ditlereuce between diges- tion aud indigestion. Indigestion, as popularly received and understood, arises from some irregularity in tiie action of the stomach, some defect in that organ or the walls of that organ, or in the secretions and tiieir actions upon the contents of the stomach. Bat if they were to look at the subject narrowly it wonld be -found that indigestion might be produced in some other way than Irom these causes. To begin with the mouth, they would had that the food when taken into the mouth was masticated ty nipans of the teeth, aud mixed into saliva or spittle. This was a very important point. The food had to he crushed, and unless the teeth were in a condition to euable them to crush tlie food properly, aud the glands were in a healtliy condition, neither mastication nor salivation could properly take pku'e, and it the food passed into the stomach in a crude state the digestive process could not go on properly. This showed the necessity of the teeth being in a sound con- dition. It was not generally known that the saliva bears a very important part in the digestive process ; it mixes with aud softens the food, and thus renders it easier to be crushed. The taite of the iood is also affected by it, and it has also a chemical acliou upon the food. Some animals could swallow their food without hardly any mastication. A dog, for in- stance, could take its food and swallow it without any chemical change taking jdace in the food at all. The food having been crushed aud softened down in the way described, it was made iuto a pellet, it was conveyed dowu the throat, and by the gullet into the stomach. Having got to tlie stomacli, when the stomach becomes full, another process of digestion goes 01). The stomach in the horse was very small in comparison to the size of the animal — not more than a sixth part of the size of the stomach of an ox. It would not liave done fur the horse to have had a large stomach, for lie has to travel long distances, and if lie had a large cavity like an ox, it would occasion very great inconvenience to him. The stomach has two coats — one a muscular coat and the other tlie mucous membrane. It was necessary that the food, when inside the stomach, should he well salivated by the secretions, and unless the food was moved about, it could not be properly saturated with the secretions or the gastric juice. If they were to place their ear on the left side of the ox when the first portion of the stomach was distended with food, they would hear this mixing of the food going on by means of the contraction of the muscular membrame. There was only one other animal that he was aware of that iiad a stomach like this, and that was a rat. The function, then, of the stomach was that of thoroughly mixing the food with the secretions of the living membrane, and it does this by means of the muscular action of the membrane coat. Within this portion of the digestive organs tliey have the softening process and the dissolving of the food by the chemical action of the gastric juice. Having undergone this proces?, it is not even then in a fit state to he absorbed, for it has to pass agaiu into tlie intestinal canal, wiiere it receives other fluid secretions from the liver, pancreas, &c. So that other organs, besides the stomach, if they are in an unhealthy state, liave the ten- dency to produce indigestion. The food, which when in the stomach is called chyme, passes from thence into the intestinal canal. This in the horse is remarkably long, compared with that of flesh-eating animals. The food which they eat contains, comparatively speaking, a small amount of nourishment, and requires a longer time for the nourishment which it contains to be abstracted. This is a reason for the intestines in a liorse to he longer than in flesh-eating animals. The length of the intestines in a horse is about 9 ft., and an iinportaut change ia the first portion of the intestine takes place before it passes the food into the first portion of the gut. It meets here a secretion called bile, and another secretion called pancreas, and by the action of these tw® secretions the chyme is con. verted into chyle. The liver of the horse is without a gall- bladder, aud in this it differs from most other mammalia. Having been subject to the action of these fluids, the food afterwards passes into the form of foeces. The extraordinary length of tlie sm al intestinal canal, which is 6-tft. in length, is for the purpose of allowing it to roll about the abdomen and shake together, like the contents of a barrel when rolled down a hill, the fluids and solids which it contains, and thoroughly mix up aud absorb the contents before they are passed into the large intestines. After passing the small por- tion of the intestines the remainder of the contents pass into the large intestines ; it is there mixed with a portion of the fluid, which washes out what food remains for absorption before it finally passes away. Such is the manner in which healthy digestive action is carried on. Were he asked what indigestion means, he should reply that it not only meant irre- gularity of stomach, hut any irregularity in any portion of the digestive system. He proposed to speak of indigestion under two heads — the first chronic, or of long standing, and acute indigestion, which may take place in a few minutes, aud ter- minate in a very sliort time. He would take the acute form first. There were several causes which would give rise to this. First there was overloading of the stomach, and taking a quantity of what was known as indigestible food. From these two causes they had acute indigestion of two very difl'ereut kinds. Suppose an animal gets to a quantity of wheat. This being a kind of food which the animal had not the opportunity of eating, he rehshes it, and eats a large quantity, and thus overloads the stomach. This food having got into the stomach, aud been mixed with the fluid there secreted, the food swell-^, aud distends tlie stomach so that the muscular coat becomes absolutely useless, and its actions wholly or partially para- lysed. Suppose a horse lakes a large quautity of this kind, so that he is unable to mix the contents of the stomach properly, a small portion only of those contents is acted upon by tlie gastric juice. There is, as they knew, a great and intima'e connection between the stomach and the brain. After eating a hearty dinner and drinking wine, a man feels inclined to sleep; this was because of the connection between the stomach and the brain. When the stomach of a iiorse becomes distended in the way he had spoken of, the animal appears unusually dull, and as the symptoms advance, he walks to the manger, or any other convenient place, and rests his head. The pulse, instead of being (rom 33 to 36 falls to 28, and even in some cases lo 24" or 20 ; the eyes immediately become glassy, and the H H 41 THE FARMER'S MAGAZIFE. pupillary opening becomes elougalcd iustead of circular, tlds showing that the brain is beinft affected. If they put him to walk, the poor animal will stagger and seem to fall. These are some of the symptoms of acute indigestion. The brain to some persons seems to be affected, but the animal is really suffering from an attack of acute indigestion. There was another cause. Suppose an animal is taken from a stable, where he has been fed on liay and corn, and gets a large amount of green food, probably clover. From this he may get acute indigestion When tlie food gets into the stomach in this way, fermentation sets in, gases escape, and the stomach becomes distended. But the symptoms are different to those in the other case. Instead of the animal being dull, sleepy, and careless, he feels a considerable amount of pain, not perhaps acute pain, as they see in ordinary gripes and colic, lie rolls on the ground, kicks about, turns round and round, and his pulse, instead of being at 32 or 36, or as in the other case, as low as 20, runs up to 55 or 60, and as the malady increases even to a greater figure than tliis ; tlie external surface of the skin sliiues, tlie flanks are distended. This arises from eating various kinds of food, such as mouldy hay, or hay badly got, or coarse dry clover, or oats covered with mould, bad oats, or kiln-dried oats — from any of these causes they might expect this form of acute indigestion. If horses are kept without water for a long time and tlien given a large quantity, this will also produce it as well as irregularity of feeding. In the first form — that wliereiu the horse suffers from cerebral symp- tums — unless relief soon takes place, a different appearance altogether comes on, and it tliere i? no change in from six to twelve hours, he becomes affected witli what is called mad staggers. He paws tlie ground, and runs en to shov/ all the symptoms of inflammation of the membranes of the brain or of the brain itself. The eyes are wild, and the horse kicks about : lie runs his head against the wall, he kicks out violently, and knocks himself about as if he did not care wlia^ became of himself, and unless soon relieved the horse win die. In the other case the evil will continue until the walls of the stomach burst by the accumulation ot gas, and so tlie horse dies. By vomiting a dog may get rid of the con- tents of his stomach, but it is very seldom that a horse can be got to vomit. Something must be got into liis stomach which may operate on its contents, and make them pass in the usual manner. AVhen a horse becomes affected as he had been de- scribing, what should be done P In the case of stomach stag- gers, or the walls ot the stomach being paralysed, he would re- commend the use of strong stimulants, such as aromatic ammo- nia, with spirits of ether or ordinary spirits. He should also give a purgative and something to rouse the nervous system and to irritatate the raerabraue, so as to stir up the secretions and enable the contents of the stomach to pass into the intes- tinal canal. When the stomach is in this distended state, if the horse were to fall down he would be liable to be ruptured, and rather than let a horse roll or stumble about when in tliis condition, he would even place him in slings. In all cases affecting the stomach and bowels they could not do better than keep the horse moving about on his legs, in order to prevent his injuring himself. In the other case, that of the presence of gaseous .material in the stomach, it was difficult to deal with, and unless they could get rid of it medicine was of no use. To get rid of the carbonic acid gas they should pour into the stomach such agents as would change it into solid matter. Aromatic spirit of ammonia was one of the best things whicli could be used for this purpose, and hartshorn was very good, and so was also, in a solid form, carbonate of ammonia. This given in small and diluted doses, will gradually bring about the breaking up or the decomposi- tion of the gaseous material ; they can then drive it out of the stomach into the bowels, and so gf t rid of it. In the other case — the chronic lorm — the evil may go on for a considerable period, and the changes brought about may be very slow in their progress. Suppose a horse in the stable or out at grass is seen not to thrive, notwithstanding any amount of food is given to him. If they examine the coat, they will find it pre- sents an unhealthy appearance, and the horse, as it is said, " stares" in his coat. The appetite is uncertain ; he feeds well for a time, and then falls off; he becomes voracious, and eats any Cjuantity of food, but without taking any notice of the quality. He will eat mouldy hay, or even his bedding some- times. He had known horses, when in this condition, eat soiled and stained bedding, and even actually eat their own foeces, just after eating a good quantity of proper food from a manger. He knew a case where a horse ate plaster, and when out at grass horses had been known to eat loam or sand. The skin appears hidebound at such times, instead of being easily and readily moved about, as is the case at ordinary times. The action of the bowels is irregular, and the horse is often supposed to have worms. The cause of chronic indigestion may be from some defect m the mouth, or in the glands which supply the spittle ; it may arise from some defect in the stomach, from want of power to contract and perform its functions, from an impaired condition of the liver, or the pancreas, or any portion of the lining of the intestinal canal. Suppose a horse has aiiything the matter with his teeth, and can only partially masticate his food. In this case a healthy chyle cannot be obtained, and all the symptoms of chronic indigestion are shown. In such cases, they might ask what chances are there of the horse's recovery? He should say this depends in a very great degree upon the length of time the ani- mal has been suffering. If it has come on recently, he should change the quality of the food, giving a diet small in quantity, but containing a large amount of nutriment. He should give, first, a purgative to get rid of the material in the stomach, and then he should feed tlie horse on a good stimulating diet. He would not treat hira so as to give rise to debility, for the hoise \^ ould have become very debilitated, and they should avoid doing anything to increase that debility. Passing sud- denly from dry to green food, affects horses in this way very much. Suppose if they were to make a change to grass, after the iiorse had been standing some time in the stable. If tlie grass were of such a kind as to afford a fair amount of nourish- ment, if it has been properly collected, and has not undergone fermentation, and does not produce over-distension of the stomach, the charge would be of a very beneficial character ' variety of food was beneficial to all animals. If they were to feed an animal in good condition upon grass, it would afford rest to him from his usual hard labour. When horses are kept for hunting or racing purposes, they must be fed on food which contains a large amount of nourishment, such as oats, peas, or beans. They had a larger amount of work to do than animals fed on less nutritious kinds of food, and if a liorse was fed properly in his stable and his food regulated nicely, giving him a grass rest would bring about a change which sometimes would have a very beneficial effect. But care must be taken that the utmost regularity is practised, or very bad results may be brought about by the change, If, however, a horse is put into pasture which does not grow grass, or is fed on clover which has run to seed and has been a long time growing, they might expect indigestion, both acute and chronic. When a horse was turned out to grass too much care and judgment could not be used. If a horse had passed the first eight or nine years of his hfe in a stable, it would not, in his opinion, do much good out at grass ; he might thrive for a time by the change, but his condition would be so reversed, and his dignstive system would undergo such an ntter change, that it could not be of benefit. Instead of having a small portion of nutritious food, without any trouble to obtain it, he has to walk over a large space before he can 'get food sufficient to afford a proper amount of nutrition. It would be like, as had been observed, taking a City alderman who had been accustomed to live on turtle and other light food, and putting hira to live on workliouse diet. Then, also, the kind of pasture into which the horse was put had to be considered. If he had been accustomed to be turned out for a portion of the year, he should not be turned out where there was a small amount of grass, or where the grass was quickly grown. This last condition had a great deal to do with the matter. In Northumberland and Cumberland it was the custom to feed horses partially in the stables and turn them out to grass at night. But the gras.-* in the northern part of the kingdom was slow in growth, and contains a large amount of nourishment. Horses thrive generally when out at grass, and there were eases where it was advisable to turn them out. For instance, where horses had a sand- crack, turniug them out to grass rests them and gives them time to recover. If they were to place such a horse in a nice soft pasture where there would be the opportunity of gentle exer- cise for the foot, it would be much better than keeping him in the stable, where, by the hardness of the place on which he stands, the action of the fott might cause the crack to open again. The horn growth was also increased by the action of the moisture from the pasture. Suppose, again, a horse had met witli an injury whereby he had lost some muscle, gentle THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 47^ Pxercise would bring it back again, aud this would be best pro- moted by turning the horse out to grass. 'JUie Proi'essor concluded by stating that he had had lately a severe attack of neuralgia, from which he was still suffering, aud had he con- sulted his own couvenience only he should not have appeared before them that evening. He expressed his desire to answer any questions that might be asked, and should be pleased to visit at another time the Farmers' Club at Maidstone. The Chairman asked the Professor what food he would recommend for cart horses, to prevent the indigestion of which he had been speaking ? Mr. Edmett asked if a horse which had been in the stable a long time, and been used to dry food, was turned out to grass, would not a little dry food given with the grass food be bene- ficial to him P He also asked if the use of the nosebag, and the dust getting through it into the lungs, would not be likely to cause indigestion ? Mr. BuRKETT said he had been in the habit every summer of turning out his horses to grass for four or five months, and gave them also the usual amount of com and other dry food wliicli they had had when they were iu the stable. The horses were turned out at the latter part of the day, when they had done their work. He should like to know whether his plan was advantageous or not. Mr. Waterman said that some farmers were iu the habit of turning out their horses for work at six o'clock in the morning, and working thera till eight o'clock ; then they had a rest and some food, and were afterwards kept on to work till 13, when they had another rest and a feed, and were turned out again to work in the afternoon. Others turned their liorses out at six o'clock, and kept them working till two, a period of eight hours. Which plan did the Professor con- sider the best— doiug tlie whole of the work to be done with- out rest, or letting the horses do it at two or three different times, as described ? Professor Pritciiard, in reply, said tiie feeding of cart horses very much depends upon the quality and kind of work which the horses were called upon to do. Horses employed in iron work and in coal pits have more laborious work than in agricultural districts, and the kind of food which should be given depends upon the nature of the work which they have to pertbrm. He was an advocate for cutting up hay for agricultural horses, instead of their eatiug the hay from a rack— of giving them as feed-stuff chatf rai.xed with corn, rather than hay and corn, also of mixing with their food a quantity of bran . Horses were in the habit of getting consti- pated bowels, and pains arising from colic, and to prevent this he advocated the mixture ofa sruall quantity of bran with theirfood. In the iron and coal works, they were in the habit of giving their horses a few peas or beans, but to agricultural horss, or horses employed ou ordinary road work, oats should be given . He tliought when horses were about to be turned out from the stable to grass, the more gradually the change was brought about the better. If they were turaed out for a fe.v hours only, and so avoided a too-sudden clianse from oue food to another, it would be a good thing. With reference to giving horses in full work the ordinary quantity of corn before turn- ing them ouito grass, he thought such a plan a good one, as then the horses would not be likely to overload their stomachs with green food, aud they would reap full benefit of the change of food. But he should take care to allow the horse to have the whole allowance of dry food, which was necessary, before turning hitn out ; because if he had the grass before the final feed of corn, the stomach would be likely to be overloaded with green food, and indigestion would probably follow. With re- ference to the question about the manner in which liorses should be worked, he was of opinion that if a team of horses were worked eight or nine hours at a time, and then taken into the stable after performing their w-rk, it would be more beneficial than it they were to do their work after resting two or three times in the day. In London this was the practice with owners of horses, and the plan was admitted to work very well. But there the horses were not usually out for so long a period as nine hours. He should not, however, recommend absten- tion from food for that length of time. He was a great advo- cate for the nosebag, and he believed since its introduction be- came general, on the recommendation of Profesor Coleman, stomach staggers were not so prevalent as they had been be- lore. Ihis he believed was due in a very great degree to the use of the nosebag'. On the motion of the Chairman, a vote of thanks was given to the Professor for his lecture. GLOUCESTER ROOT SHOW. JUDGES.— Hoots : S. Priday, J . Witcomb, and D. Vick. ROOTS. SWEDES. Twelve of any variety. — First prize, Earl Ducie, Whitfield Farm ; second, C. H. Price, The Hayes, Newent ; third, J. Copner, Hill Farm, Stonehouse. Commended : C. Cadle, the Hall, Awre. Six heaviest, no award. TURNIPS. Twelve white round. — JN'o entry. Twelve Lincolnshire red globe. — No award. Twelve green globe. — First prize, C. H. Price ; second, T. Robinson, Longford House. Twelve ycllovv Scotch. — No award. Twelve grey stone. — No entry. Twelve yellow tankard. — No entry. Twelve tankard (other varieties). — J. Copner. Six heaviest. — C. H. Price. mangolds. Twelve yellow or orange globe. — First prize, N. Jenner, Buckover Farm ; second, 1. Theyer, Zoons Farm, Hucclecote. Highly commended : C. Cadle and Earl Ducie. Commended : T. G. Parry, Highnaiu Court. Twelve long yellow. — J. D. Crump, The Hawthorns, Corse. Twelve long red. — First prize, N. Jenner ; second, T. Morris, Maisemore. Highly commended ; Capt. Lysons, Pontvijle, Bristol-road. Twelve red globe.— J. D. Crump. Six heaviest. — First prize, N- Jenner ; second, T. Lowe, Hucclecote. CARROTS. Twelve red. — First prize, B. St. John Ackers, Prinknash Park; second, T. Lowe. Twelve white. — First prize. Earl Ducie ; second, J. Bucha- n3n, Campdcn. PARSNIPS. Twelve.— First prize, B. St. John Ackers; second, W. Bannister, Barton-street. Highly commended : T. Parry and T. Robinson. COW CABBAGE. Three large. — First prize. Earl Ducie ; second, J. H. Tyler, Tytherington. KOHL RABI. Twelve green. — First prize, J. Buchanan ; second, T. Gam- bier Parry. Highly commended : J. Copner. Twelve purple. — First prize, J. Buchanan ; second, J. Copner. KING'S ROOT SHOW AT COGGESHALL. — List of the Prizes : Champion orange globe wnrzel.— First, Messrs. Dixon, Wickham ; second, R. W. Hall Dare, Wrenningham ; third, E. J. Ash, Chadwell, St. Mary's. Yellow globe wurzel. — First, Messrs. Grout, Tothara ; second, — Staines, Gosfield ; third, R. W. Hall Dare. Red globe wurzel.— First, Messrs. Dixou ; second, — Staines. Long red wurzel.— First, W. S. Goodchild. Glemsford ; second, Messrs. Dixon. Long yellow wurzel. — First, R.jW. Hall Dare ; second, — Staines. Interme- diate wurzel. — First, T. Yeldhara, Stambourne ; second, R. W. Hall'Dare. Heaviest mangel.— First, W. S. Goodchild. Un- rivalled swede— First, W. Joyce, Waltham ; second, Mrs. Honywood, Marks Hall ; third, T. Kiug, Halsted. Skirving svcede. — First, J. Hutley, Stebbing ; second, J. Howell, Little Walsingham ; third, — Bolton, Terling. Heaviest swede.— J. Hutley. White globe turnips. — First, W. Stubbins, Boreham ; second, Mrs. Pyle, Sidmoutli, Devon. Green globe turnip. — First, H. Smith, Leighs ; second, G. Pettitt, Mount Bures. Green kohl rahi. — First, Central Loudon District School, Hanwell ; second, Mr. D. Robertson, Avely. H H 2 476 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. CARMARTHENSHIRE FARMERS' CLUB. MANURES. At tlie usual quarterly meeting in Carmartlien, Mr. D. Davies, Ystradsralter, president, iu the chair. Tlie raffle took place, whea the I'oUowiug prizes were distributed : Horse- rake, Mr. W. W. Prosser, Alityferin ; chaff-cutter, Mr. Thomas ; weighing-machine, Mr. Davies, Typicca ; kniie- stand, Mr. J. Rees, Llwynyfortune ; cart-rope, Mr. D. Harries, Abersanu ; dung-fork, Mr. T. Davies, Wernddu ; Mr. Thomas, merchant; JMr.P. Lewis, butcher; hay-fork, Mr. D. Jeremy, Cwraddu ; Mr. T. Rees, Tvy Bush ; Mr. Davies, Waunllane ; Mr. Humphreys, Coed ; Mr. Thomas, Penlan ; Mr. Davies, Cincoed. The .winner of tiie horse-rake had to pay £4 towards the funds of the Club. Dr. HOFKINS then said : I have been called upon somewliat suddenly to introduce the subject of Manures. Manure is a very large subject, and one intimately connected with every transaction in farming. We are almost connected with it during the whole of the year ; and in one w.iy or another, it comes up for discussion at every meeting of our Club, unless we except that of breeding of cattle, and our farm produce. Manure is composed mostly ef two constituents, represented by two divisions — tlie organic and inorganic — all manures are divided between these two, and it will be for you, gentlemen, and I see many here well capable of taking ^the matter up from a practical point of view, that I do not intend to do more thon introduce it to you. It is for you to decide the manures best calculated to the cultivation of your lands. There are many gentlemen in this meeting who, I am sure, will follow up my few remarks. I shall first speak with regard to,the advantages of manuie as the main pillar of farming. We have various ways of placing manure. Take organic first, it is dung, or farmyard manure. We all know that farmyard manure is the best, that is, if we can get it ; but in this country we are un- fortunately unable to procure a sullicient supply. Whetiier large or small larmeTS can farm profitably, before they can do so well, tiiey must have plenty of manure. I therefore would suggest, where that is deficient, as uufortunately it is in too many cases in this country, that greater care should be taken of the liquid manure arising from that already existing, by the erection of tanks to save all that now passes away to where it is not required. I tliink too little attention has been paid in nearly all the farms of this country, to the use of liquid ma- nure ; I must state that here, too little attention has been given to the draining from farmyards, and the saving ol such. Another portion of organic manure is the neglect ot plashing our hedges, and getting hold of all sorts of vegetable remains, such as the clearing out of ponds and ditches, because it is a fact that what was once a vegetable will become a vegetable again ; I assert that tliere has not been sufficient attention paid to the scraping out of old ponds and ditches, and to the use of other vegetable remains at present at our service ; they have been too often neglected in this country. Considering the thinness of the soil with us, the use of every adjuvant is in- dispensably necessary — the great consideration is to make as much manure as you can, which, as I told you before is the main pillar of farming. Another thing which is very valuable to us and a great deodiser and absorbent is peat. It is nearly within every one's reach, and when dry is a great absorbent of liquid manure, and should be placed at the bottom of every farmyard to absorb that which would ctlierwise be lost. Having been in water for so many years, it is not nearly so valuable as a manure until it has been animalised if you have tanks or any other convenient place, in which you can add the liquid manure so as to produce that effect, I say you cannot make a finer manure than with peat. It is really pure carbon, or charcoal, and as I said before has the power of charcoal of deodorising. I am not going to detain you by any lengthened remarks, be- cause tliere are many practical men of talent to follow me, and it would be impertinent on my part to dictate to you as to which is the best plan ; that I leave necessar ly as an open subject. But now I come to the inorganic manure ; at the head of all which is lime, then we have phosphates and super- phosphates, burnt clays, common salt, and ammoniacal salts, soot, &c., &c., and it is for you to say, how far one supersedes the other in your different localities ; liow far they will meet your necessities and supply your wants. Taking cattle or sheep for example, these ingredients will be found of eminent service in rearing and feeding. Burnt clay you will find is an exceedingly beuefical manure upon the poorest of laud where peat is to be had to char it ; if you burn one with the other it makes au excellent and active manure. A little work has been published by au celebrated Professor under the French Government of how to farm without manure, and if you read it you will find this, I must say the essay is a very scientific and valuable addition to what we know of farming; you will find there that the analysis of farm produce such as beet root, peas, beans, and the leguminous pl.ints, abstract certain salts from the soil which if returned to it by the Krower will make it as fertile as before for the same or any forthcoming crop. If you grow mangolds, wheat, and other produce from the soil, you will find that it robs it of certain ingredients in excess, which you as farmers will have to return to the soil, so as to reproduce the fertility of whifh it had been deprived. It is for you to return to the soil that of whicli you have taken from it, and give it back to put it in the position in which it was before you meddled with it. Farming is nothing more than an exceedingly rough system of gardening, where if you do not rotate the crops you will have to resupply what I told you before, you deprive the earth of. All we can do is to adopt the best plan that our circumstances will permit. Potash is like ammonaia or lime ; a great fertiliser in minute quantities and in the work published by the French Govern- ment, you will find how these are to be supplied. Please let me tell you, gentlemen, this is not hypjlheses but founded upon most careful experiments, conducted iu the most elaborate manner. Because you often iiear men say, " I think this and I think the other," when in reality they know next to nothing absut it, for these experiments have been carried on ill the science of chemistry without affection or fear of any scrutiny, so as to render the greatest amount of advautage to the agricultural public iu general. I now leave to my fol- lowers the filling up of any omissions on my part, and to those gentlemen who have commissions to urge the respective merits of their favourite measures, and to show them to be worthy of your notice. Mr. Brodiz did not profess to know much about the scien- tific side of the subject that had been so ably introduced to them by Dr. Hopkins ; but if it would do any good one way or other, he would tell them what he really did himself. He might tell thera that he had not been successful in his first means for supplementing bis farm yard manures. He had used animalised carbon, and bad fouud that it was not worth a penny. He had dropped down now to a plain and simple mode of manuring his farm. This scheme of his did not require any scientific knowledge ; common sense, he might tell the Doctor, was just as good as chemistry. Besides, in this scheme there was another advautage; he was not the least careful who he dealt with ; he would as soon buy from Mike Sullivan and Co. as from J. B. Lewes and Co. ; as soon from anybody else as from H. T. Proctor and Co. Perhaps Dr. Hopkins or some of I them would not believe him when he announced bis plan ; but in truth it was merely this : he crushed his own bones. [" A i very good plan" from Dr. Hopkins.) Bones he bouglit all the year round, in different quarters, as he had said. These I bones he allowed to ferment ; he did not even dissolve them. I They came to the roots of the plants, to the help of the land, as well that way he found as if they were dissolved ; not having the appliances about for dissolving the bones thoroughly he took this metliodaud was satisfied with it. In any other way of dealing with these bones he found that often the acid in them that was of use was all but lost ; at all events, the bill was always to pay, which could not well but be a point of im- portance ill tbe eyes of the farmer. He believed his plan was a good one. He went in, of course, after so crushing the bones for careful mixing. He hoped nobody would adopt his plan and outstrip him in success. Mr. Warren would only supplement Dr. Ilopkims's remarks as to manures that were very muc!i neglected, by remarking THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 477 tliat those wlio live near the sea left most valuable manure to lie unappropriated, and so go to waste. Admirable crops and large crops were grown with such manure he assured them ; it contained potash and soda and other salts. He thought the manure (o be thus obtained shonld be more utilised than it was. Mr. D. T. MoERis explained that when it was known that Mr. Pughsley was unable to be with him it was suggested that H few notes that had been put together on the subject he should read to tiiem ; but he was pleased that the arrangement liad been carried out as it liad been. Lie would still, if it pleased the club, read to them the notes of the paper to which he referred, lie then read as follows: With your permission 1 beg to offer a lew remarks upon farmyard manure, more par- ticularly that of horse-dung, which 1 verily believe many farmers in this and the adjoining county do not value nearly as much as they ouglit to. The dung of farmyards generally is the produce of h:iy, straw, turnips, and so forth, and is used, as you are all aware, as provender or litter upon the firm. When cattle are housed, it is invariably carried and put i.i a heap on some high place — sometimes in large heaps — consequently when heavy rain comes it washes away all, or nearly so, of the feitilising properties it contains ; therefore, 1 would suggest that to retain the liquid a place should be made purposely for holding it — say two or three feet deep — and if t'le ground is not of a clajish nature, let it be cemented so t lat the ground should not absorb the liquid, as the latter CJutaius the principal fertilising ingredient. This tank or C'sspool should be so constructed as, in the event of ai overflow of liquid, another tank should be placed f jr the overplus ; and, when this is full, let it then be t.ikeu in a cask upon wheels and allowed to run over the surface of the iield, tlie dung, alter a time, being well mixed and taken to the field and spread upon the land when in tillage ; the dung, covered by the earth, soon passes tlirough its course of fermentation and becomes decomposed and mixed, or coiiibined with the matter of the soil. Where the dung produced is very rich and decomposed, as where cattle liave been feeding in stalls on juicy and nutritive food, it may not require much turning over to lit it for use ; yet even in such a case it is generally beneficial that it ha turned over before being used, the effect being to ferment tiie mass not only sulliciently but equally, and to mix its different parts together. Now, referriug to house dung particularly, I may here remark 1 am often grieved when going into a farm-yard to see a large heap of this steaming away. Possibly you may not all be aware that the steam you see and smell is tlie ferilisiug properties of the liurse dung, and the means by which the farmer may return these is to put the stable dung into a square heap, and iu every twelve or eighteen inches rise place a layer of gypsum, tine earth, or ashes. Then this evaporation condenses and tails back in the dung, and when the manure is got out, instead of being dry and mouldy, with no fertilising qualities, ii will be like bread thickly buttered, with all the ingredients horse dung contains. I should also observe that when the stable opens upon a common yard the dung should not be allowed to accumulate in a heap about the stable, but be spread abroad upon the general heap. A square wall built iu the jard to contain the dung would be advisable, so as to prevent evaporation through the sides. I'rofessor Muspratt says, " it is better to take dung into the field fresh from the stable and plough it into the ground llrin throw it in a heap and allow it to evaporate." This 1 can easily understand, as you have then all the fertilising properties of the horse dung in the soil. Low also says, " that horse dung is more susceptible of quick fermentation thau that of oxen," and this is why I should advise dung to go through the process I name. After fermentation is over there should be a thorough mixing pre- viously to its bcint; put upon the laud, rrepa'ing manure in this way you will find one ton worth three of that where the evaporation has escaped. Perhaps there are some here who luiagine the solid excrements of a liorte that is badly kept have the same fertilising properties as those of a horse well kept ; most decidedly not, tor the bst'er you keep your horse the better he will do your work, and the dung will be worth three times as much. Mr. Harries said the point he would more particularly press on them than any other, perhaps, was the importance of looking after the farm-yard liquid manure, which so often was allowed to run waste. lie quite agreed witli Mr. Morris in what he had said as to the horse manure, and the prevention of loss or waste from evaporation. One thing had been said in which he did not agree ; that was Dr. Hopkins' remarks relative to peat. He differed from the Dr. in this question i/i toto. Peat was one of the worst so-called manures they could have. It would not pay any one, he believed, to spend five shillings on it. There was, for one thing, more labour re- quired regarding it than it was all worth. He certainly would not advise any one to speculate in peat as a manure. He be- lieved there ought to be no farm-yard without a building for the accumulation and mixing of farm-yard manures ; all the farm-yard manure, which was the best they could have, should be received into this tank. Much of that valuable manure was at thi? present time neglected and overlooked ; and if it was all utilised, and its value fully appreciated, there would be almost no necessity for artificial manures. The expense ot haulage, which was very great, he alluded to briefly as a great difficulty in the way of the farmer perfectly manuring his land. Nitrate of soda was one of the most marvellous things he had ever seen ; it had, however, to be used with caution and care. Mr. Thomas (Derllys) believed when he got the intimation of a paper by Mr. Pughsley on Manures, that he and Mr. Morris would come forward as the advocates of an entirely new manure, lie had heard them talking of a new manure that was to be got at the works ; sulphate, or hydrate of copper it was, if he mistook not, which being mixed with earth, made an excellent manure. He thought Mr. Pughsley, had he been here, would have been more taken up with clieniical manures than auy other. The farm-yard manures they knew a little about, but chemical manures they lived to learn about. They, in using these chemical or artificial manures, were— at all events most of them were — groping in the dark, and did not know what they got. Especially after such short crops as they had had this year, any information or suggestions Mr. Pughsley could have given them would, he had no doubt, have been acceptable and valuable. Many things were very much neglected, as they had heard. One of the neglected things was to be found in this— that they had never provided any safeguard for the fanners, any means of ensuring that iu what artificial manures they bought they got their money's worth. The best firms were represented, no doubt, in this town, b men of good standing ; but, after all, he thought it was tli duty of this club to guard the members against being taken iu by the sellers of artificial manures. This could only be done by arranging for analysis of these artificial manures. Mr. Letis spoke strongly in favour of peat as an absorbent and fertiliser ; he likewise agreed that in the slaughter-houses of towns like Carmarthen there was a great waste of very valuable manure. In Llandilo Mr. Tliomas had the whole benefit of the slaughter-house, and he even complaiued of the manure being too rich ; he advised hira to mow sooner thau he did. Mr. Harris (Llandilo) referred to a manure he had used, that was like some that had been mentioned, of lit'le worth — he meant a manure tliat was called economieal. He was now using a much superior mixture— superphosphate and bone, mited half-and-half. Parmyard manure, of course, lie at- tempted to secure in as large quantities as possible. Mr. Broauman said the subject was a large one, but it could be narrowed down by remembering that farmyard manure was the mainstay of the furmer, and that all artificial manures were supplementary to it, and were required because of the limited quantity of it that could be procured. He advised thorough economy in farmyard manure, especially liquid, and stated the arrangements he had on his farm used for the preservation of it all. He had everything under cover, thus avoiding the loss of liquid manure, and the decrease in value of the other kinds through rain or the effects of the sub. He explained, likewise, the carelul mixing he made of tlie dif- ferent manures. By the system he adopted he liad manure worth from 7s. to 8s. per load. Coming to artificial manures, he remarked that he had tried nitrate of soda alone, and was not pleased with it. He was thoroughly convinced of tlie pro- priety of the scheme advocated in a work published under the auspices of the Royal Agricultural Society, in which it was set forth that the mixing of the mineral and other manures made a difference in the effect of the manures on the land, doubling if not sometimes trebling it. Nitrate of soda and mineral superphosphate were calculated to keep the laud in as perfect a state of productiveness as auytliing he knew, lleferring to the way in which the manure was piled where there was no tank or pit on the farm, he thought there was great room for 478 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. improvement ; they piled up their heaps in these haif-.-quare and half-oval forms. By this method, he hehl, the raiu water was allowed to get into the heap and destroy the fertilising powers of the manure. He recommended the manure to he heaped up in the shape of a house, tlie thickest part in the middle, and earth to he then heaped on the top of that. He was sure the more science they applied to the cultivation of the soil the greater would be their reward. He mentioned to the members a very excellent book he had recently come across, Professor Johnson's Agriculture, Chemistry, and Geology, which treated of the application of manure, and the way to preserve it. Mr. James (Carregceggan) pointed out the importance of giving every kiad of laud tiie manure suitable for it ; he was sure any mouey carefully spent iu this work, or in the price of manure would pay them better than any bank. Mr. TuoiiAS (Moreb) spoke very strongly in favour of slaughter-house manure, of which he had a fair trial at Llandilo. He found the few fields lie held even too richly fed ; he was prevented, however, by his landlord from taking more than one crop a year, so that he made sure of getting a thundering good one when he did cut. He agreed with the majoi-ity of the speakers, as to the value of farmyard manure, the advisability of saving it, and on many of the minor points as well. Mr. J. L. PdiLPPS layed particular stress on mixing the manure they intended to lay on the land with eartli or water ; he repudiated the idea of the necessity for a tank ; it was only necessary to have a pit at the farmyard for the purpose ; it would allow of all manure being there mixed sufficiently. Nothing was of more importance than the thorough mixing through and through. They could not expect good manure from anything but well fed animals ; it would not do to saturate straw with dirty water and call it manure. He con- demned at some length the application of lirae to the land when it was not required ; when applied under such circum- stances it was not manure, or food to the land, but poison. Referring to aitificial manures he came to speak of "the Economical," after warning them tliat in trying artificial they should not strive after or look for anything else than a fair art\cle for fair price. This " Economical " they were told of was advertised as having a backing up of 2,000 testimonials, one of which was from his frieud on the right, Mr. W. E. B. Gwyn, Plas Cwrt Hir. That manure was supposed to be a substitute for guano ; it certainly was nothing of the sort ; it was quite worthless. Mr. Phillips believe 1 peat was a good manure, and that the member who had spoken of it as no manure at all was perfectly wrong. He suggested a pit with good mixing and the use of absorbents, so as to avoid the ex- pense of a tank. The rain water could, he showed, be thrown off. Mr. tiwiN agreed to a very great extent with Mr. Phillips' remarks. On his own farm all th:? manure was well mixed as it was carried out every day. The suggestions as to peat, made by Dr. Hopkins, he considered excellent ; and among tlie unutilized means at the liand of every farmer, some of whicli had been pointed out by Dr. Hopkins, he thought the refuse from hedges and ditches was not sulficiently looked to. He intended himself, in the coming season, carting 300 or iOO cartluls of that lor the purpose of mixing witli light soil ; it made a capital manure. Referring to tlie Economical Manure, he had tried it, and had, it was true, sent a-testi- monial to the dealers that it was not worth much. Mr. Morga:n, Llwyn, supported warmly the proposal for the protection of the members by the club, through the ap- pointment of an analyist. He was certainly in favour of peat as a manure, and proved its valu3 by several illustrations. He held that the mixing of all manures in a pit, which should be covered with earth, one of the best absorbents we could have, was a capital plan. He had tried tlic Economical, but he had not intended to say anythiug about it unless somebody else spoke first ; he thought nobody else could have been such a foul as to meddle with it. The Chairm.«lJJ having thanked Dr. Hopkins on behalf of the club, and summed up the discussion, Dr. HoPKiJCS, replying on the discussion, said that Mr. Harris made a great mistake iu saying that peat was not a manure and no use ; and lie (the Dr.) was glad to find that every one also seemed to share the opinion that he liad enun- ciated in his opening address to the effect that peat was a very beneficial manure, and especially so when mixed with animal substances. Peat was nothing less than the decays of the vegetables of ages, mostly grass and water plants, the remains of which consisted nearly of pure carbon or charcoal, known to be an enormous fertiliser, and even when put upon red land, unaided, proved a considerable fertiliser. With regard to the observations which had been made as regarded clay, he would say that even brick dust when placed on vegetables, especially the vine was of itself a great service as a manure. As an illus- tration of his meaning, he might say, and he thought he would bring it home to every practical farmer, that when a tjonSre had been made upon laud so as to clear the surface, the crops there were three weeks earlier ; a more plump, and a finer colour, and could be seen at a distance before any other portion of the field, although the ashes had been carefnlly scattered about. In addition to what had been said of the heaps of manure, the best plan that had hitherto been pro- posed had been the making of a tank in the centre of the farmyard for receiving the liquid manure, into which a pump could be fixed at a very small co^t, and by which means the liquid manure could from time to time he pumped over and upon the heaps, so as to increase the strength of the manure to the utmost extent. Then again he might remark that those gentlemen who farmed in the vicinity of towns where bituminous coals were burnt, could not do better than purchase the soot, which might be easily obtained at not more than about from 1-J. to (id. per bushel. This could be sown broad cast upon wheat or grass lands with great success and advan- tage, and made a fine and powerful manure. COUNTY BOARDS.— Whilst the Central Chamber of Agriculture lias passed a resolution in favour of extending District Highway Boards through the country, and making the Highway Acts compulsory, some of our local Boards have been making inefi'ectual efforts to dissolve themselves. There can be no doubt that in the Eastern Counties the new system is extremely unpopular; but does it follow that we sliould return to the old system, witii all its neglect and irregularity ? Let us hope not. The complaint against the new system is that it is loo expensive. This is chiefly because the District Surveyor receives a high salary for doing very little beyon issuing directions and keeping accounts, whilst the AVaywardeus do the practical work of Surveyors as the Parish Surveyors did under the old system. Hov\' would it be to have an Inspector of Highways for every County, County Boards County Rates (aided by Government support, if we can ge it), and Parish Surveyors, as of old ? Under that plan tlie expense of employing a Prolessioual Surveyor would be spread over a larger area. One man can inspect a very extensive mileage of roads in the course of the year, and it is said that the District Surveyorsnow du little more tlianinspect the roads. The Parish Surveyors would, of course, act under the control of the County Board, and would be compelled, if unwilling, to keep their roads iu proper order. Complaints could be made to the Inspector, who would report to the Board. It may be obj.-'cted that if there were a County Rate, Parish Surveyors would be careless of expense. Well, perhaps tliey would not be so parsimonious as they commonly were uuder the old system, but the ratepayers, who would elect them, would take care to choose men not likely to be extravagant, and the Board, too, would check inordinate expenditure. — The Essex Sfandard. From the county report of our own East Essex correspondent as given iu another place, we gather that " the proposal of the Central Chamber of Agriculture that highway districts should be made compulsory throughout the country, will be most unpopular in the Eastern Counties. Two of our district boards liave for some time been ineffectually attempting suicide, but the magistrates — no doubt members of the Humane Society — insist on saving their lives. But the magistrates should have nothing to do with the matter. We want County Pinaucial Boards to take charge of the highway and other business." THE IRISH FLAX TRADE.— At the meetiug of the Balliueeu Parmers' Club, Colonel Bernard, the chair- man, said he had received a letter from Mr. Anderson, of the Belfast Flax Association, froiii vvhicli he regretted to observe that trade iu the North of Ireland was still dull — a circumstance that would account for the comparatively low prices obtained for flax. THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 479 CONFERENCE OF POOR-LAW GUARDIANS IN THE WEST. The annual Conference of the Poor-law Guardians of the South-Westerii Counties took place at Sherborne, under the presidency of Earl Nelson, who said he had failed in getting any one to read a paper that day, but what they really wanted was not so much a statement of fact as discussion. It was olten re- marked at these meetings that there was very little method in tliera. It was true they began perhaps with medical relief, or friendly societies, and then passed to the loan system or sani- tary officers, and then to poor-house accommodation ; but every speech was sure to end in the question with which their discussions were mostly filled — the question of out-door re- lief— and people who were outsiders looked upon it as a i jumble, and did not understand it. It was very easy to give a ' reason why that must be the case, and at tlie same time to defend the committee for having proposed at all the confer- ences the question — What accommodation is essential in a workhouse to enable the gardians to carry out the provisions of the Poor-law and to meet the present requirements of the Local Government Board ? They were all pretty well agreed that the object of the Poor-law should be to encourage thrift, and to discourage pauperism by using tlie VTorkhouse as a test for real destitution, and by doing away as far as possible with out-door relief. It was no use to mince matters, and to talk about people's " independence.'' Tiiere was no real test but " the house." Every one was willing enough to let their parents receive medical or out-door relief, or to receive it themselves, as long as they were left in their own dwellings ; and therefore without t]\r, Wrothara, Sevenoaks. H. Roberts, St. James-street, Bath. T. Rose, Melton Magna, "Wymondliam. ,. H. S. Waller, Farmington, Northleacb. Kennet Were, Sidtnoi-th. A. E. Wyatr, Strawberry-hill Housp, Lynipstone. A SHOW AT HOLKHAM. The Committee of the Norfolk Agricultural Society lias decided to recommend that the meeting of next year should be lield atrakenham in preference to Dereham. These two towns being the only applicants, the decision given to the former in preference to the latter v>ill be generally acceded in. One place, however, probably through forgetfulness or doubt, has been passed by, which will be thought, for various solid reasons, past and present, by the agricultural interest, not only of Norfolk, but of all England — as that at which of all others, at this moment, the Norfolk Agricultural Society should hold its anniversary. That place is llolkham Park, the birthplace of that system of husbandry which raised the character of the tenantry of England by the example of its great leader, and by the practical effects which that example produced up to the time when the Holkhara Sheepshearings terminated. It is slightly beyond a half-century from that time when the turn of the Western Division ot the county again arrives. Year by year since the Society has made au annual migration to the dilferent divisions of tlie county, its celebrity lias risen in tlie increased numbers and excellence of the stock exhibited, and in the quality, novelty, and superiority of the machinery siiown, while tlie numbers who have flocked to the show, not only of proprietors and tenantry, but also of the cultivators and their families, have increased in a way wiiich lias astonished even those who were the most ardent for the change of s\steni — a change which has proved most beneficial to the labourers, and profitable to the Society. The last meeting at Holkhara was held in 1821, and as Mr. Cuke then gave a resume of tiie improvements which had emanated from that agricultural meeiiua's, the opportunity would uovv present itself to compare the advance made within the last half-century with that made during the Holkham annual gatherings. And it is the more desirable that this opportunity should be given from the fact that the Essay for which the Earl ot Leicester has offered a prize is to be the result of a pertonal knowledge of the progress and practice actually made within the specified time. Now it is in llolkham Park that not a little of agricultural advance in cultivation on the llolkham Estate, as well as in the immediate district, will be found. There would, perhaps, be few persons there in 1875 who saw or can know wliat Holkham aud the farms and stock immediately around it were, but the tenantry and the landowners «ould be able to see 'xnd judge by com- parison with the above-named resume wLit it has became under modern improvement, and that union of capital, energy, and science, with praciical skill, which has reclaimed nearly one thousand acres from the sea, aud made it a prolific and valuable addition to the estate handed down to its noble proprietor, who lias proved himself, by his devotion to agricultural pursuits, a worthy son of that great pioneer in agricultural advancement — i\ir. Coke, of Holkham. Looking at what has been accomplished on the Holkham Estate, 1 ^cntu^e to urge on the Committee to re-consider their recom- niendaliou, and, if it be not adverse to the wishes of Lord Leicester, that llolkham I'ark should be ouce again the scene ol the triumphs of agriculture iu Norfolk. We might then hope that the Rojal Patron, iu common with the landed pro- prietors aud tlie tenantry, will feel it to he their "duty, not less than ilieir interest, to connect society by one K^aud bond of liarmony " iu Holkham Park in July, 1875, as in the days when the first week in July saw the lamed assemblage of that time congregate on the domain. — The KorKich Mcrturij. THE ROYAL AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY OF IRELAND. Tlie m onthly meeting of the Council was held at the office. Upper Sackviile-street, on Thursday, October 29th, Sir Allen Walsli, Bart., in the chair. The other members present were Viscount Powerscourt, Hon. Bowes Daly, Major Borrowes, L. Waldon, L. Cust, H. Harris, E. Purdon, D. Millward, J. Robertson, Eev. R. W. Bagot, H. J. MacFarlane, S. F. Adair, C. Connor, P. Riall, H. H. Woods, J. M. Royse, W. Donnelly, C. U. Townsend, C. Cobbe, R. Chaloner, and J. Simpson. Major BoERO-WES, agreeably to notice which he had pre- viously given, moved: "That the wording of conditions for tenant-farmers at present ' limited for competition to tenant- farmers whose Poor-law valuation is under £ per annum' be altered to ' Tenant-farmers holding land under valuation £100 a year ;' and the same intention be carried out in all the rules affe.jted by same wording." The object, he said, in bringing forward this matter was, that at the last meeting of Council several objections were made against exhibitors whose holdings were over £100 a year valuation. It had been proved that tenant-farmers had competed who held labd value for £500 or £G00 a year, and, therefore, they were not the class of agriculturists whom it was originally intended should carry off these prizes. By limiting the rule to tenant-farmers holding land under £100 a year, they would effectually stop such parties carrying off prizes. The resolution was seconded and adopted, with a trifling alteration. The next matter for discussion was Mr. Macfarlane's notice of motion, as follows: "That the objection of Mr. M. A. Maher, in reference to the decision at Wexford council meeting, by which bis thorough-bred sire Gunboat was disqualified, be re-considered." Mr. MAcFARL.i^^■E said lie was not sure whether they had the power to re-consider the matter, and therefore he ap- proached the question with some difficulty. Mr. Maher's object seemed to be to have the character ot his horse Mr. Cannon rose to order. They should have the decision of the chairman on the point as to whether or not they could go into the question at all. On looking at the rules a few days ago he observed that no protest on veterinary grounds could be rescinded. That was set forth in page 28, aud was under rule Si. Mr. MacFaelane moved the following resolution : " That the V. S. at Wexford show, on whom devolved the duty aud responsibility of reporting as to the freeness of Gunboat from any hereditary disease, appears to this Council not to have sufficiently informed himself as to the nature of the enlarge- ment on the haugh of Gunboat on the seat of spavin, and the judges, in consequence, could not award him the prize or Croker Challenge Cup ; and this Council regret that the rules for competition prevent the decision arrived at by the Wexford Council being now re-opened in favour of such a superior sire as Gunboat." TheC'HAiKHAN said as the resolution had not been seconded it fell to the ground. Mr. Macearlane handed in the following notice of motion : " That at the future shows of this Society such steps be taken, and arrangements made, as will ensure the fullest considera- tion of an appeal made by any exiiibitor against a decision on veterinary grounds." Mr. Townsend mentioned that in the month of August last he brought under the notice of the Council the desirability of offering prizes for the best managed farms in the county or province in which the shows of the Society were held. This course bad been adopted with great success in England, and could not fail to be useful if followed in this country. He moved the appointment of a committee to report whether it would be advisable to oft'er prizes as in England, how this could be best accomplished, and what steps should be taken to provide the necessary funds. Mr. MacFarlane said he had much pleisure in seconding the motion, Lelieviug as he did that this was a most valuable thing to accomplish. He also took additional interest in the matter, bccanse he had received a letter from a friend who was disposed to give a prize for the most superiorly niauaged farm in the four counties with which he was identified. The gen- tleman in question wrote to him, to give him some outline as to how the prizes should be awarded. 482 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE, The resolution was put from the chair aud adopted, and tlie following gentlemen were appointed as a committee to draw up a report on the subject: The Rev. R. W. Bagot, Sir Allen Walsh, Bart., J. Robertson, D. Millward, E. Purdon, J. M. Royse, P. Riall, C. Cobbe, L. Cust, C. Cannon, H. J. Mac- Farlane, Colonel Vesey, and C. Uniacke Townsend. On the motion of Mr. MacFarlaue, seconded by Mr. D. Milltvard, a resolution of condolence was passed to the Duke of Leinster and his family on the death of his father, who had been most active in the administration of the Society, and for over sixteen years its President. Mr. W. W. D. Pollard Urquhart, Kanturk, Castlepollard, was admitted a member of the Society. THE TIPTREE LETTERS. There is great scope for the profitable investment of capital in the reclamation of many millions of acres of waste land which now disgrace this wealthy country. In this neighbourhood much of the once barren heath has beeu couverted into useful arable laud. The Duke of Sutherland is most commeudably reclaiming the vast wastes on his estate iu Sutherland, aud wisely using steam as the motive power. The non-use of steam power is a misfortune for British agriculture. It must ultimately become an important element of increased production aud profit. In Scotland, where 300 years ago a law was passed to compel landowners to build a school iu every parish, there has long beeu general education, and consequently steam power has there for very mauy years been ajipreciatcd and availed of in agriculture. — J. J. Mechi. TO THE EDITOR OF THE MARK LANE EXPRESS. Sir,— Mr. Mechi, in his wild letter in The Times of -Tuesday, in his talk about the many millions of waste acres, merely cuckoos Odger. Again, it is notorious that steam is far less used iu Scotland than iu England. Ask any agricultural engine builder, and he will tell you there arc a few fixed thrashing engines in the Lothians, but hardly a portable in all Scotland, where steam-ploughing is a long way behind England. The letter is intended to give the impression that English Agriculture has remained stationary, and is written to please outsiders and con- sumers. Yours, A MiDLANDER. Permanent pasture employs a minimum of labour and capital, and is a great obstruction to the production of human food. — J. J. Mechi. Sir, — I am renting a farm in Somerset, composed of 486 acres permanent pasture aud 148 arable. The capital employed iu farming it is £10,000 ; the manual labour during last year amounted to £1,143, aud the human food produced was 60 tons of prime cheese and over 50 tons of ])ork, besides corn, which realised £711. There is nothing exceptionable in the laud, nor was the season I have chronicled propitious, for in the spring the cows were suffering from foot-and-mouth disei.se (in con- sequence of which nine died), and the summer was far too dry for grass to abound on fairly stocked land. \Vheu- ever Mr. Mechi leads us into the green (ields we cannot forbear a smile at his expense. Yours, Winchester, J. Stkattox Chilcombe. [Iu The Times.'] CONTAGIOUS DISEASES (ANIMALS) ACT. ■ Memorial forwarded by the local authority for the county of Norfolk to the Privy Council : — To the Lords of Her Majesty's Most Honourable Privy Council. Tlie memorial of the Justices of the Peace, as the Local Authority for the County of Norfolk, in quarter sessions assembled, the 22ad October, 1874, showeth. — That your memorialists are decidedly of opinion the costly experiment which has now been tried for upwards of twelve months in Great Britain, of attempting to stamp out pleuro-pneumonia by slaughter of all cattle found to be affected with that disease and compensating the owners, must certainly fail, unless such slaughter and compensation are extended to Ireland. That the county of Norfolk is the largest winter grazing county iu England, and that the great majority of cattle there fed are imported direct from Ireland. That although Irish cattle generally arrive m an apparently healthy condition, several have been attacked with pleuro-pneumonia shortly after arrival ; thus sliowiug that the disease must iiave been con- tracted in Ireland, or upon the jouruey into Norfolk. Tliat your memorialists are aware a rigid inspection of cattle coming from Ireland has recently been established at the ports of embarkation ; but they are satisfied such inspection is power- less 10 prevent the exportation of a disease where the period of incubation extends to weeks, and sometimes to moullis. That your memorialists have good reason for believing that outbreaks of pleuro-pneumonia in Ireland are not iu all cases reported to the authorities ; and they are strengthened in that opinion by their own experience, previous to compensation being allowed, of the unwillinguess of stockowiiers to give notice of the disease. That since the Animals (Amendment) Order of 1873 has been in force in this county, upwards of 1,200 cattle have been slaughtered by order of the inspectors of the local authority, in consequence of being afflicted with pleuropneumonia, but without in any way arresting the pro- gress of the disease. The compensation payable to the owners of such cattle out of the county rate considerably exceeds £5,000. Your memorialists therefore pray that, in conformity with the unanimous recommeudation of the select Committee of the House of Commons, compulsory slaughter with com- pensation for pleuro-pneumonia should be extended to Iielaad, or, if that be fouud impracticable, that the Animuls (Amend- ment) Order of 1S73, as now in lorce in Great Britain, so far as relates to compulsory slaughter, should be at once rescinded. DEATH 01" DALESMAN.— Mr. Chaplin has just lost this well-known horse, at a time when he was becoming especially valuable. Dalesman, bred by Baron Rothschild in 1803, was by King Tom, out of Agnes by Pantaloon. After a not very brilliant career on the turf he was purchased by Captain Bar- low, in whose charge Dalesman became distinguished iu the show-ring, being, perhaps, the best horse for the purpose who ever won the Royal Agricultural Society's premium, as he did at Hull iu 1873. At Manchester, however. Dales- man had actually been put below such animals as Carbineer and Laughing Stock— ^an outrageous mistake, as we pointed out at the time, aud of course he beat Carbineer at Hull, as we had predicted he must when they met again. Dalesman was sold by Captain Barlow to Lord Spencer, who took him to Ireland, aud then in turn to Mr. Chapliu, in whose possession he won at finll. Dalesman was himself a capital sample of the thoroughbred hunter, as the sire of some good liuuting stock, v.l.ile from very few blood inarcs there came Lowlauder, one of the best race-horses of the day at heavy weights. :i'HE PAEMEE'S MAGAZINE. 483 THE ASSESSMENT OF MINES. lu the Court of Queen's Bench, Westminster, before Justices Blackburn, Mellor, and Lush, an appeal was heard against the rating of South Garadon Mine by tlie Assess- ment Committee of the Liskeard Union. Tlie appellants, who were represented by Mr. H. Lopes, Q.C., M.P., and Mr. Pinder, were Eichard Kittow, Thomas Kittow, Christopher Childs, John Laurence, and John Kaby ; and they had been rated to the relief of the poor as the occupiers of surface land at South Caradon Mine, with the houses, buildings, machinery, tramways, and plant thereon. The rate having been objected to, the present case had been stated for the opinion of the Court. It seemed that by a deed made on the 6th May, 1862, the Rev. G. P. Norris and Mary Ann, his wife, the owners in fee of the land in question, granted to Richard Kittow and Thomas Kittow, and Peter Clyma, since deceased, power and authority to dig and searcii for metals and minerals throughout the laud for a term of twenty-one years. The operations under that licence had been carried on by a company under the cost- book system ; and the company had, in accordance with the provi- sions of the deed, erected houses, buildings, and sheds on the land, and fixed all the machinery and plant requisite for the general workiug of the mine. All the buildings were on the surface land, and this, together with the other laud of the miue, formed tlie subject of tlie rat'. Tiie appellants were the surviving grantees under the deed, and shareholders of the company, of which Thomas Kittow was purser. The question to-be decided was whether the appellants were occupiers of the property, and liable to be rated ? Mr. Lopss contended that there was no occupation of the soil beyond what was actually necessary for working the mine ; that there vvas no rateable occupation at all ; that everytliing that was conveyed by the deed was a mere privilege or licence ; that no exclusive occupation was intended to be given by it ; and that if tiiere was a rateable occupation, the appellants were nut the occu- piers. Tlie deed conferred a mere incorporeal /lereditaraent, and did not in any way deal with the actual soil. The appellants had not the exclusive possession of the houses and buildings which had been erected ; and if they had, that would merely authorise the rating of the laud on which they stood, and not the rating of the whole of the surface land of the mine. The grantors had actually reserved to themselves the power to drive adits and make water-courses within the very limits of tlie mine. Mr. Justice Blackburn : None of which have, in fact, been acted upon. Mr. Lopes contended that the substantial intention only of the deed must be regarded. E\ery thing that was rated was subservient to tlie miue. Under tlie Act which would come into force in January nest a mine, qua mine, would be no longer rated, but the dues or royalty ; and the rate so assessed would be jajable half by the occupier and half by the landlord. The Act also provided that the occupier was to be the pursuer, wlioic name should be on the rate-book, and expressly said that the dues being rateable, neither the surlace nor anything appertaining to the mine should be rated. Assuming that the occupation in the present case was rateable, were tlie appellants the occupiers? Mr. Justice Blackburn : If they are not, who are ? Mr. Lopes submitted that he was not compelled to show that. His Lordship considered that doing so would be au im- portant step in the case. Mr. Lopes argued that neither of the appellants was in the occupation of the houses ; tliey had no interest of any kind in the soil. The mine had probably been in existence for two thousand jears, and up to the present time no rate had ever been levied upon it. His Lordship : Then it is time that one should be put on. We will liear argument, but cannot be iutluenced by assertion. Mr. Lopes had no intention to make an assertion which was not justified by th« facts. His Lordship, without calling upon Sir H. James, Q.C., and Mr. Poland, delivered judgment in favour of the Assess- ment Committee. A dictum of Mr. Justice Bailey had given rise to the idea that because a mine was not rateabls the other things along with it were not. That was a mistake ; and where there v/as an exclusive occupation of land, though it was for the purpose of assisting to work the mine, the laud so occupied was rateable. He would assume in favour of the appellants that the deed itself contained nothing but alicence ; nevertheless, dc facto, those acting under it had been per- mitted to erect houses, buildings, sheds, steam-engiues, and machinery, and to make tram and other roads. The appellants were in occupation of those things by their servants, and they were rateable for that at all events. The other judges concurring, the appeal was dismissed THE PRICE OF SHEEP IN TASMANIA.— The sheep farmers of Tasmania seem to occupy the proud position of possessing the flocks to which the sheep farmers in the other colonies look for stud animals to improve their breeds. Our Gibsons, Taylors, Kermodes, Eields, Archers, and Tooseys, are names as familiar in the other colonies, in connection with the highest class breeds of sheep, as they are in Tasmania, and others of our sheep farmers are fast treading on their heels. The great suitability of our climate is being turned to the best account by a careful selection of pure stock, and an equally careful attention to their flocks, till the very fact of a sheep being Tasmanian imparts a certain additional value. We are led to make these remarks by the very satisfactory result, so far as yet ascertained, of a sale of pure sheep at Melbourne, that was looked forward to with considerable interest through- out Victoria, and even in the other colonies. An advertise- ment by Messrs. Powers, Rutherford and Co., the well-known auctioneers, occupied a column in the Melbourne papers with a list of high-class sheep entrusted to them for sale. Among the owners of stock advertised for sale, we find names well- known in Victoria, but the greater number were Tasmanian, including Messrs. W. Gibson and Son, James Gibson, W. 11. Gibson, T. D. Toosey, AV. Archer, VViu. Field, James Brock, Geo. Wilson, W. Dodery, and R. Jones. Our Ifelbourue correspondent's telegram informs us that Mr. William Field's pure Leicester ewes were sold at prices reaching up to £21 10s. We were shown a private telegram, received on Saturday, by the Hon. James Whyte, which stated prices received by Mr. James Gibson, unprecedented in the colonies. Mr. Gibson advertised " his far-famed stud, pure merino ram, ' Sir Thomas,' one of the grandest sires in the colonies, and in every respect a most perfect sheep." That Sir Thomas' qualifications were not over-stated was shown by the price realised. Seven hundred and fourteen pounds (XTli) for one sheep ! Mr. James Gibson also offered for sale 150 stud rams by Sir Thomas and Goldendrop, and other rams the progeny of Sir Thomas. The first 26 offered averaged £53 per head. One word as to the Scab Act. That piece of legislation has been found fault with as harsh and unjust. Perhaps it has made careless sheepowners pay for their carelessness, but had there been no Scab Act, would Sir Thomas have been alloAed to enter Victoria, or, if allowed admission, how far would he liave fallen short of £714 ?— T/;e Uobart Town 2Lercury. THE SHORTHORN SOCIETY.— Expression is just now being given to a very strong feeling of dissatisfaction at the treaty for the purchase of The Herd Book having fallen through ; and it has been suggested that the new Society should forthwith make arrangements for publishing it own Shorthorn Register, in which, of course, there would be room for improvement on the present cumbrous system of pre- serving stock pedigrees. 484 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. A SATISFIE Having learned atiade in bojliood (tliough born on a farm near Bot,tot)) I worked at it until, in 1834-, I then concluded to " go weit" in search of better fortune. A journey of filteen days brought me to Buffalo, and in the wiuter ot 1835-G I purchased 130 acrts ol l&nd at 25 dollars per acre, which, as it was a tin:e of general inflation, was regarded an extremely liigh f rice. 1 ) aid 200 dollars down, and boriowed money to make lurther pajments in the spring. 'Ihe faim was mostly woods, with a poor log house ; about fiftfen acres cleared and fenced, and about three miles from the village. IS'ot a very inviting residence. I took possession in 1836; hired a man and set him to clearing, fencing, Sec. iHiring the iollowing winter I got off some wood and timber. About this time the great bubble burst with a tremendous crash, and business all closed up. T waited patiently till the spring of 1838, but nothing turned up for me. I was not quite ready to encounter the cares ol the new home, being all unacquainted with farm life, but after looking the subject squarely in the face, decided to make the attempt, though not without some doubt and mis- giving. But necessity overcame all oljrctions, for which I have ever been tliaiiklul ; and I proceeded at once to build a small shell of a house, 18 by 26 feet, enclosed with good sound matched boards, without plastering or paint. My wife contrived to paper neatly, with the various kinds of newspapers, which answered the double purpose of keeping the cold out and educating our cluldren. We were now about to take possession of what we expected in due time, to make a comfortable home; yet under the circum- stances, the outlook was not very encouraging. Our family consisted of myself, 44 years old, wife, 40, and five children — the eldest a daughter about 13, three sous and an infant daughter, not a very formidable force to begin with on a new farm. My capital was small, nut exceeding SOOdols. cash ; a credit always available wiien wanted ; furni- ture sufficient to make us comfortable ; strong, willing hands, and a young, growing family. I lured a man, took off my coat, and weni to work in earnest. The year previous I had made some little progress in clearing, fencing, &c., whieli, by- the-way, cost 15 dols. to 20 dols. per acre. Our first available cash crop w as 100 cords of wood, at 1 dol. 12^c. per cent., and what little could be retailed in the village at L dol. 25c. Oak timber — but little, however, of that— at from 70 dols. to 80 dols. per cubic thousand ; very little money in either after paying expenses. The first permanent inijirovement was a " bank" barn 40 by 100 feet, with stables under the wliole. Kcxt, a good substantial stone house, suitable for all purposes of comfort and convenience. In 1848 to 1850 I had paid up llie first purchase and bought thirty acres adjoining, for which I was to pay 25 dols. per acre, which was paid in due time. About this time my eldest son became of age, and proposed looking for something better. He did so, and spent several months, and relumed fully satisfied, and went to work with the understanding it the boys wanted farms our unit(d cfl'orts would be more available than separate. Tliis was all the arrangement made with my sons, whowere expected to remain at home and take their chance on the iarm, and here com- menced our co-operative farming. We then had four sous, the second studying for a piolession ; the third, iourteen jears old, who was expected to remain on the fiirm. In 1852 and 1853 we had made good progress, and were getting on quite well. In August, 1853, we were cht iked by the burn- ing of our barn, witn all our wheat, hay and most of our faim- ing tools, litre 1 would rimark that, in addition to our iormer cajiital, a windfall came into the family of 2,000 dols, wliidi assisted in rebuilding the barn, which we commenced at once en a more approved plan, 56 by 76 feet, with basement stablts (or some tliiity head, and good root cellar. JSow, as opportunity ofiered, from this time to 1857, we purchased 410 acres ol laud, tor which we were to pay some 21,000 dollars. This for a time insured a tax of 3 dollars per day interest. The next purchase was a house and lot in tlie village, lor 1,200 dollais; then a little more land that adjoined us, which we coveted and purchased; lien, from 1861 to 1865, we bouglit 171 acres ii.oie, wiiich cost about 11,000 dollars, and was the last purclisc of real estate. In 1866 my sous were both D FARMER. t married. The ycuEger settled in his new hcn.e, wliich cos about 7,CC0 dollars, i.nd the eldest took possession, in the spiiug of 1867, of his building, estimated at about 10,000 dollars. It now became necessary to make a division, and we proceeded to do so, with the lollowiug result: Ihe faim ou which we commenced in 1838, contained ISO acres. Previous to our division we had sold 15 acres, for which we received an advance of about 700 dollais. Dollars. We had added by purchase, 610 acres, making in all 740, foi which we liad 36,778 paid a li action less ihan 50 dollars per acre Permanent imp'"ovements, buildings, &c. on homestead 7,000 For the first son married and settled about 7,000 Tor the other, in spring of 1867 10,000 Loss by fire 4,000 Educating two SODS professionally 3,000 Two substitutes for army 1,400 House and lot in village 1,200 Stockand tools 4,600 Cash on hand, permanent improvements, &c. ... 4,500 Total 79,478 Now for the result as far as the boys are interested. Tliey have performed their part faithfully and perseveringly to the end, and should be well paid. They leave for their new homes with good warranty deeds for 560 acres of choice land, with all fixtures and appurtenances thereto belonging, stock, tools, and well and handsomely located, worth at least 75,000 dols. If my sons, when they became of age, had wanted and obtained situations as clerks in some respectable, well-established busi- ness, they should have received for their services, eacli, 3,500 dols. per year, to have balanced their receipts from the farm, and then they would not have had comforts and privileges as at home, with few exceptions, besides the exposure and in- fluence of city life, and probably been no better, if so well educated for the common business of life. Now let the boys who are looking forward to that end, remember that nothing really valuable can be obtained without well-directed, persevering effort, and that a well-developea brain is very essential to that end; that mother earth always pays liberally and promptly for wclldirec'ed labour, and that seed-time and l-.arvesl have never failed. As the subject of temperance is being so fully and freely discussed, I will say that in early life I adopted tiie motto, " Taste not, touch uot, the unclean thing." \Vhen I commenced farming, 1 was told that harvestiug could not be done or a buildiug raised without its use. I have, however, done all my harvesting, raised several large barns, some of them requiring the services of one hundred men, and carried out all our operations on the farm without its use, to the fullest extent. I am aware that some of my brother- farmers may be a little incredulous as regards my state- ments, without some further explanation. 1 would say that our forests were disappearing, so I was induced to purchase largely of heavy woodland, on whicli was a very good limestone quarry, suitable for building purposes and for lime, all of which we made available for bolli purposes. We con- verted some 400 or 500 acres of this timber into cord-wood, &.C., and from 1854 to 1868 put into market from 1,000 to 1,500 cords yearly. We cleared and cultivated as we pro- ceeded, and in so doing we kept as many men aud teams as would pay all the time. Our winter crop was the most pro- ductive aud profitable, yet the farm furnished the means and results, as before stated. Now, as I am about to bring my long, rambling story to a close, L will only add that iu this record of my larming operations I have endeavoured to show results aud not particulars, and that a good practical mechanic in middle lile might change his business, if he has a desire and taste for farming, and in the end be successful. As a wiiole, he is better qualified, can plan, lay out, aud execute better. 1 liave raised good crops of the various kinds, and some not so good. In 1863 1 had ninety acres of wheat which promised a large return, but after thrashiug six days with ten-horse power, I got only 600 bushels. If the midge had let me alone THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 4.8.! the first thrashing should have yielded more than 3,000 bushels. Here we were short 3,300 dollars. The straw from forty acres, seventy-three tons, sold for 730 dollars. But similar losses happen alike to all, and who but farmers will feed the insects and birds ? — Aii, Octogenarian, in the New England Farmer, THE AGRICULTURE OF ALGERIA. One of the best of the French generals is now engaged in administering the affairs of Algeria, a country where soldiers in the highest grade? of the army with doubtful politics, or suspected lack of zeal for the existing state of affairs, whether Orleanist, Republican, or Bouapartist, have been made to pass a period of honourable banishment. The sombre weird-like scenery, with the flitting Arabs and the life on the plains or hills, is said, however, to work a fascination upon all who have passed their time iu African service ; and to the inlluence upon the morale of the privates and officers whilst serving there was attri- buted some share iu the disasters that recently befell the army of France. By competent observers it has beeu thought that the mission of colonisation has been fulfilled, and that sentiments too depreciatory of French occupa- tion have been entertained. The restoration to civilisation of this former empire of the Mediterranean is a task worthy of a nation that is more llian any other impressed with the desire to rival the great actions of antiquity. The portion most favourable for cultivation stretches in a belt along the sea coast, and is protected from the intolerable heat of the desert by the ranges of the Lesser and Greater Atlas, whose sides are clothed with magnifi- cent forests and their summits capped with snow. The Tell, as it is called, contains not less than thirty millions of acres, of which about ten to twelve millions are planted with the cereals. Here the principal markets are held, and the inhabitants of the interior resort thither at certain seasons of the year, to join in the harvesting of the grain, and to purchase or exchange their varied productions. The land, although very fertile, remains untilled in many places, for the want of settled occupiers, the natives being of a migratory character. It is usual to plough and sow in October, and if the rains fall in abundance during April a good crop is tolerably certain, and the harvest takes place at the end of May or the beginning of June. The plough is the same as that used in Spain and Provence, but not shod with iron ; it is drawn by cows and asses, very rarely by horses, yet with such an imperfect imple- ment the crops are generally excellent. When reaped, the grain is trodden out by cattle or horses, and after being cleaned, by throwing it up against the wind is deposited in subterranean eaves or magazines. The wheat mostly grown is the Triticum duncm, this hard wheat of Algeria being much esteemed in European markets for the manu- facture of maccaroni, vermicelli, and other pates -. the gluten which forms the essential element for the trans- formation into maccaroni exists in greater quantities than in that of other countries, even in that of Taganrog and Sicily. The variety of barley cultivated by the natives, and which the Europeans have adopted as the most productive, is the Hordeum tioxicsticum ; but other kinds have been sown with success. There being no oats grown, it is used as food for mules and horses, but the poor classes eat it too : it is also grown as forage, either to be cut green, or made into hay. Algerian barley is well adapted for the manufacture of malt liquors. Amongst the mountains of the Atlas, which extend to the interior and terminate in the Sahara, there are immense plateaux, where agriculture is an absolute impossibility, but the breeding of sheep supplies the colony with one of the great sources of wealth. Before the Conquest, the Arabs reaped hardly any advantage from their flocks, save their own subsistence, as they were to a great extent cut off from a market on the sea coast by the rapacity of the intervening tribes. For some years after the Con- quest, 2s. or Ss. was considered a fair price for a sheep ; eveu five or six years ago, one could be purchased at the market near Algiers for from 9s. to lis.; now a similar beast fetches from 16s. to 20s., and when sent to Paris by rapid steam transport it realises from 32s. to 40s. ; and in summer more than 20,000 sheep are thus sent to France every month. The sheep are of two kinds : one small with a thick large tail, the other of much larger size, chiefly found in the coun- try of the Getulfc. The fine Tuniscan breed are not to be met with. The cattle usually are black ; their milk is inferior to that of European cattle ; that of the sheep and goats — the latter animals being uumerous — is most used iu making cheese and butter. The Arabs seldom diminish their flocks by killing them for food, but live on their milk and wool. The common beasts of burden are camels, dromedaries, asses, and mules. The horses are not always, nor even ofteu of the pure Arab breed, not altoge- ther well shaped, being lanky and round shouldered, small and not ill-formed, ear erect, and they are hardy, fleet, spirited, and docil. Those of Oran are considered the best: they are used for riding, and like the camels are reared and live iu the tents with their masters. The average head of cattle is a million and a-half. The cultivation of cereal crops will ever stand at the head of Algerian agriculture. There is a perpetual outlet for its superfluity. England alone would take what Algeria has to spare ; and where these provinces made to rise to their utmost limits, they are believed capable of producing 220 million bushels of cereals annually. The Fi'ench are at present making strenuous attempts to colo- nise, by offering inducements to the former residents of Alsace and Loraine, and an exposition of industry has been projected to take place in the autumn of next year, that will prove a source of attraction to the visitors from other countries. The difficulties which the European population have to encounter in their dealings with the natives are almost insurmountable, and often result in uprisings and rebellions, which greatly retard the progress of the country. The habits of the Arab are such thai being a man of pre-eminently few wants, he can well aftbrd to sell his labour at a low figure, asking 1 f. 50 c. per day, when the European demands 2 f. 50 c. But the Arab's highest motive is avarice : he refuses himself subtantial nourishment, the result of which is a visible failing of jhysical power. He is unable to continue any one kind of work which will require the consecutive employment of any single set of muscles for more than a couple of hours at a stretch; and unfortunately there is no combi- nation of agricultural labour which will admit of constant change of occupation. His absolute ignorance also becomes a stumbling block to a proper execution of a task, as well as his unutterable laziness. By those who have seen him at work he is describedas being awkward with the pick, more awkward with the hoe, whilst his habit ( f going barefoot eflectually prevents his working with a spade. The plough he holds loosely with one hand, while with the other he goads the bulls, whose business it is to drag it over the soil. When we consider that the Arab's paradise is to bask in the sun, and smoke and wrangle, we 486 can well imagine to ourselves the labourer he raaKes. The European colonist must, therefore, turn watch-do;r, and stand over his Arab labourer, if the task that he has THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. set himself to do in the restoration of the ancient border lands of Carthage can ever be made capable of accom- plishment. COUNTY BUSINESS AND COUNTY BOARDS. At a meeting of the Winfrith Farmers' Club a very general opinion was expressed that " with re- gard to the landlord and tenant bill and various other subjects, such as local taxation and the malt-tax, differ as they might do thereon, they would not be fairly repre- sented until they had a ]\Iinister of Agriculture." And at a meeting of the Norfolk Chamber of Agriculture, only two days afterwards, a strong majority, in a full meeting, was in favour of the establishment of Couuty Boards, altogether apart from Quarter Sessions, " to manage matters relating to bridges, lunatics, weights andmeasures, with jurisdiction under the health act, and of course under the contagious diseases of animals act, as well as with the roads to look after." The resolution termed this a County Committee, but Mr. Sewell Read spoke directly to the more familiar title of a County Board for the administration of county rates. There is a straightforward simplicity of action, as here recommended by the Norfolk Chamber, which comes in favourable contrast to the more fussy and less weighty proceedings of similar associations. In so many words, there should be county roads maintained by couuty rates, and managed by county committees, further empowered to undertake other matters, independent of magistrates' business, or, to put it plainly, out of magistrates' Jiauds. And yet it is very doubtful whether this way of cutting the Gordian knot by the Alexander of Agriculture will have the approval of the Central Chamber, as clearly for this reason : the magistrates or landlords are at heart loath to lose any of their local power, and, as Mr. Hutchings puts it, "the Chambers are overshadowed and their freedom crushed by the influence of the land- lords." There can be no possible mistake as to the position taken by the leaders of the country party. Mr. Henley, the very Mentor of the Commons, and long the chairman of a bench, has maintained that " they have managed their affairs very smoothly ;" while Lord llamjjton, the Telemaehus of the Lords, has declared that " there is nothing to complain of in the internal management of the affairs of our counties, no extrava- gance, and no mismanagement ;" Sir Mathew Ridley, that " the financial business in evei-y county of England by a numerous body of gentlemen has long been per- formed to the advantage and satisfaction of the public," and so on. All this was said some years since, but it will be certainly interesting to hear now what Lord Hampton, Mr. Chaplin, and other heads of the school may say on their next appearance in Salisbury Square. There was read, also some years since, at the Farmers' Club a paper advocating the establishment of Couuty Boards, which was so far adopted by the Club that a copy of it was at once sent to every member of the Upper and Lower Houses ; and in this a petition was quoted which went very much to say that which Mr. Read said in Norwich, as well as what some other people are saying all over the country. Thus, the petition served to show how "the amount of county taxation has very much increased;" how "taxation without representation is entirely at variance with the principles of a free consti- tution;" and, wherefore, "your honourable House will be pleased to enact a measure for the sepai'ation of the financial from the judicial duties of county justices, and to appoint county finance boards, in which the ratepayers may be fairly represented, for the management of county finances." Mr. Read's'advice or argument ran precisely in this course, but we think it will be found that he spoke more after the manner of the London Farmers' Club than the London Chamber of Agriculture. At any rate here is an opportunity. No one who has studied any of these questions will care to deny that local taxation, the highways, and cattle diseases would be all the better for efficient, or in other words duly recog- nised local direction. We shall venture to assume that no farmer will dare to oppose any proposal for the establish- ment of County Boards ; as on the other hand it will be good to see how many are prepared to openly support such a movement. Highway boards, Cattle-disease Com- mittees and so forth will be very poor shifts or substitutes for that concentrated control, of which some people are already fighting shy. At a meeting of the Central Chamber in the Spring it was distinctly stated that since his ac- cession to office, Mr. Sewell Read had thrown cold water on the cause, that he was muzzled, and so on. Since then the honourable gentleman has explained that he has been doing all he can to advance agriculture with the Government, and now he broaches, or revives a proposal which should he the very foundation of something more, as affording to the farmers more power and more i-epre- sentation. For this very reason we repeat the movement will be distasteful to many of the landlords who have either avoided or declared against it. Of course, we do not know whether the Chamber will go for County Boards on Tuesday, but if such a principle be avoided or smothered in mere verbiage, then Mr. Read to right him- self should give notice of a distinct yea-or-nay motion on the subject, if only in order to ascertain who is now muzzled, who is throwing cold water on the cause, who is prepared to thoroughly support, carefully stay away, or sit tongue-tied under any county member's opposition to County Boards. A report on a Government Department for Agriculture will be presented on Tuesday ; but one should lead up to the other, and a central office without local machinery would be manifestly imperfect. Of course an Agricultural Department and a Minister of Agriculture, as talked of at the Winfrith Club, should mean much the same thing; but of late this has not been very becomingly put about. Since the site of the foreign market was selected the Government, whether as represented by Mr. Forster or the Duke of Richmond, or the staff, or, further, through the City of London, has never done anything right. Time even has not tempered the discomfiture, and in Dorsetshire but a week or so since the meeting heard how the Corporation paid a premium for the site of the London market to the proprietor of a skittle-alley, and how this man was a friend of the solicitor of the Admi- ralty. But then it is only human nature that people should be looking after premiums, and if the game of skittles was won it was probably lost. But this is scarcely the line to take over a Government Department In any case the first and most available step should be towards the establishment of County Boards, as it is only to be hoped that the council of the Chamber will not feel it necessary to refer this matter to a Committee of Inquiry. THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. ^87 THE MAmTBNANCE OF HIGHWAYS. At a meeting on Monday of the Devon and Cornwall Cham- ber of Agriculture at Liskeard, the Mayor in the chair, in introducing the subject, remarked upon the many questions connected with agriculture which required to be discussed, with a view to elicit opinions and arrive at the best conclusions. The subject nf large and small farms was one of these. The exigencies of modern farming rendered improved implements necessary, and these were costly, and could be only afforded by those who farmed a large quantity of ground. On the other hand he often saw very large farms under very indifferent cul- tivation, large tracts of ground enclosed by hedges, it is true, but in a state very little better tiian slieep runs ; and certainly it would be very much to tlie advantage of the community if these farms were cut in two With respect to highways, they must have good roads; but the question was who was to pay for maintaining them, and how ? Good roads were costly ; hings, but they paid themselves in diminished liorse-power required, and smaller saddlers', blacksmiths', and wheel- wrights' bills. Mr. Henry Steel (Bicton) iu proposing the first resolu- tion, said that the speedy abolition of turnpike trusts was a foregone conclusion. Iu many places it had already been done, others, like that of Liskeard, the trusts had been re- newed for only a limited period — seven years. But it must be a wasteful system in which one-third the proceeds of the pikes were absorbed in cost of collection, aud it was a great annoy- ance to be stopped every now and then to pay a small sum at a gate. Certainly such a system is quite opposed to the re- forming spirit of the age. At present any district could join a highway board under the Acts of 1SG3 aud 1864, and this liad been very generally done, especially in the West of Eng- land. Bnt he urged that they should be made universal and compulsory, and that as soon as possible. The cost of main- taining the roads haa been certainly greater under highway boards thau before, bu.t the condition of the roads was infi- nitely better, aud a few would like to return to the condition of things existing before 1863. The Highways Boards Acts were capable of amendment it was true, the system of audit should be improved, and the date of the expiry of the offiee of the waywardens should be made so co-teirainous witii the expiry of the financial year. But on the whole, they had worked so well that he desired to see tliem at once, if possible, supersede the turnpike trusts. He therefore moved — " That it is expedient that the remaining turnpike trusts be abolished as speedily as possible, and the formation of highway boards be made com- pulsory." Mr. S. RosEVERE seconded the motion, pointing out the unfair way in which the system of turnpikes operated, and the waste which resulted from such a mode of eollecliou. Mr. LuscoMBE opposed the resolution. He could not see what it mattered to the farmers what the cost of collection was so long as they had not to pay for it. , Mr. Tremavne, M.P., reminded the last speaker that when the amount raised by tolls did not suffice ior the repair of the roads, the magistrates were empowered to raise a rate to sup- plement it ; aud in some places, St. Austell for instance, this was actually done. Mr. N. RosEVERE supported the resolution. He was able in his neighbourhood to use the turnpike road without paying toll; but this was not equitable to the public generally; and dealing with the matter on a broad principle a rate would be more just and advantageous. The Rev. R. Marti:^, of Menheniot, pointed out that when the turnpike roads were thrown on the rates it would be very unfair to burden the parishes through which the turnpike roads liappened to pass with the cost of maintaining them. It was explained that under the scheme proposed by the Chamber the cost would be borne by a general rate, spread equally over th.e whole district. Mr. Tremayne having given the motion his support, it was put. and carried, with only three dissentients. Mr. Pryn, of Callingtou, moved, " That there be only one class of roads (private roads excepted), and that all roads be maintained from the common fund raised by the highway boards, as at present constituted." He urged that the work of maintaining the roads could be carried out much better by highway boards than by county magistrates in quarter sessions. He did not see why the wliole work could not be done with one staff of officials and surveyors and clerks, and he believed iu the long run it would cost them less for rates than for turnpike tolls. They ought to look at the matter patriotically, as to what was best for the whole country and not for individuals. JMr. G. Dewdney supported the motion, urging that it wonld be more economical and in every way beneficial that all the I roads within every highway district should be under one staff I and maintained from a common fund. He enforced his remarks . by citing the experience of his own district, where they had taken over thirty miles of turnpike-road. Mr. Sobey explained the meaning of the motion, tlie wording of which he thought to be obscure. Mr. Prout urged that in tlie proposed taking over the turnpike-roads and throwing the burden of them ou the rates, it should not be forgotten that many farms had been rented on the basis of the supposition that no such burden existed or would be placed on the farms, and a higher rent was paid in consequence of this immunity. To saddle such farms with additional cost would be unfair, unless allowance were made for it. Mr. S. RosEYERE had come to the conclusion that two dis- tinct classes of roads should be maintained, and not all roads be merged into one class. Ou the chief roads thousands of persons travel who derive more benefit from those roads than the persons who would pay rates to support then. At the same time there was something in the argument that the repair of the roads could be effected more economically by one staff of officials than by two, and it had occurred to him that this might be done, and yet the payment of that repair be derived from different funds — one for the first class, and one for the second class roads. Mr. N. STEPHE^'S said that it appeared to him to be a sound principle that " those who daneed should pay the fidler," or, as in this case, that those who used the roads should pay for the use of them. Now the fairest way to do that would be to devote to the repair of the road a tax on carriages and horses — a gradiated scale of taxes would be most equitable. But as the horse-tax had been abolished by Government, for which he was very sorry, he would apply to this purpose the tax on carriages, for certainly he did not see why those who had no vehicles, and did not use the roads, should contribute to their maintenance as much as those who did use them. The motion was then put aud carried, only two or three hands being raised against it. Mr. Pratt, of Buckland, moved " That tlie funds now raised by licences on carriages be transferred to the county treasurer, in order that they may be distributed ^;ro raid among the Highway Boards." They had heard that the amount at present raised by taxes on carriages was £520,000. He con- tended that while Government received so substantial a sura as the result of taxes on carriages, the burden of the whole cost of maintaining the roads should not be borne by the rate- payers, but this half-a-million ought to be handed over for their relief. A tax on carriages he thought a very good tax, as it was a tax on luxuries — tliey saw many luxurious equi- pages rolling along their roads — as distinct from a tax on industry. Government, through Mr. Clare Read, had asked them as practical men to chalk out for them some way in which this great and important question should be dealt with. The council of the Devon and Cornwall Chamber had arrived at this in their solution of the difficulty ; the Central Chamber had arrived at a different conclusion, but perhaps it might hereafter change its opinion, when they saw what the views of the country chambers were. It was felt at Callingtou, when this subject was last discussed, that if the highways were all transferred to the Boards, and maintained by rates, many who now paid for the roads, and who ought to pay, would be alto- gether relieved of the taxes. This would be remedied by the adoption of the proposal which he had the honour to move. Mr. Prout seconded the motion. He contended that if the tolls were removed, the assessed taxes on carriages should be devoted to the purposes to which the tolls were formerly The faRxMer's magazine. put. Tliat, iiideed, was tlie ouly way 'thny had of gpttiug hold of some persons who used the roads, and who did uot pay rates. There were many lodgers, for iustance, who took their drives ia hired carriages, aud how, except iu tiiat way, were they to be made to pay their share for the injury done to the roads? If assessed taxes oa carriages were still paid, it was immaterial to those who paid whether the amount went te the repair of the roads or to tlie Gevernment. They had been told that the taxes on carriages amounted to about a quarter of a. million, and the total receipts of turnpikes to about two millions. Surely it was not too much for Government to pay them back from the imperial exchequer the quarter part of what the turnpikes had realised, aud this was just what the taxes on carriages had produced. Mr. STEP^E^'S asked what reason could he adduced for maintaining the tax on carriages whicli did uot equally apply, maintaining the taxes on horses ? Mr. Groser (Plymouth) had not intended to take part in the proceedings, but as a member of the sub-committee of the council which liad drawn up tliese resolutions, it might be well that l\e should point some of the difficulties with wliich they had found the subject to be surrounded. It had been laid down as an axiom by Mr. Stephens that the user of a road should pay for its maintenance, and that therefore the assessed duties on carriages ought to be maintained and ap()lied to the repair of roads. But who was the user of a road ? Everyone was, iu fact, a user for whose use anything was drawn over tiie roads. A householder, although he himself owaed no vehicle, required supplies, say of coals. Tiiey were drawn for his use, not iu his own carts, but in the vehicles of the coalJealer. But the consumer was really the user of tiie road, for he paid for tlie cartage and all tlie expenses attending on the cartage. If the cart in coming to him passed through a turnpike-gate the cost of traversing the turnpike-road was paid by the pur- chase) of the coals in the shape of tolls. If the turnpike-gate were abolished and the cost of the repair of the roada thrown on the rates, the consumer of the coals would still pay, uot in the form of tolls, but iri the form of rales. No assessed tax on carriages, therefore, was necessary to make him pay ; but if there were an assessed tax on the cart tliat brought coals to liim, although nominally paid by the dealer, the consumer would really pay it in the form of an enhanced price charged for liis coals. So with all other commodities, although, per- haps, in a less marked degree. Again, ii had been said by Mr. Prout that an asserted tax on carriages or turnpike tolls were necessary, in order to get at the lodger who rode out in hired vehicles, and did not pay rates. But surely that was not so. The livery-stable from which the lodger's vehicle was liired would be rated, and pay its quota for the repair of roads. The amount so paid as rates would increase the lirery-stable keeper's expenses, a fact he would be sure to remember when making his charge to the lodger for the use of the carriage. The same would be true, but not more true, of any payment in the form of assessed taxes. The user, be he ratepayer or lodger, wonlJ one way or anotiier be " got at," and would pay ills share. Again, Mr. Pratt had depreciated taxes on in- dustries, aud said that an assessed tax on carriages was a right one, because it was a tax on luxuries — the use of luxurious carriages on roads. B'lt he (Mr. Groser) thought tiiey would find that if they were to have roads kept up by the rates, assisted by taxes on vehicles, that vehicles used for industries must be taxed as well as others, lie would illus- trate what he meant by referring to the case of mines, although clay works or manufactories would be equally to the point. Supposing a mine were opened in the middle of a moor, and a tramway were made to convey material to and fro. Would they say tliat such a tramway, used for the en- richment of one set of adventurers, should be maintained from the highway rates? Of course not. If, instead of a tramway, a private road were made, still they would say that the cost of that road, cut up by the mine carts, should not be paid from the rates. But if the mine were started close to an existing highway already maintained from the rates, and it were cut up by tlie incessant cartage from the mine? What then ? It would still be a public road, but it would be a road used to an excessive degree for the private benefit of one set of speculators, who would hope to realise a profit from the use of that public road for their own purposes. No ordinary assessment to the poor-rates would toucli them ade- quately, for, perhaps, the mine would not be paying dues ou wbich assessment could be levied. Some special form of taxation ; perhaps an assessed tax on carriages would be necessary. But then the farmers must be prepared to have their owu farm vehicles, which were at present exempt, taxed also, for they did the same thing, although perhaps in a less marked degree. Yet this would be a tax on industry, and un- doubtedly iu the abstract all taxes on locomotion were unde- sirable. It was a national advantage to have good roads, great ar'eries of communication, and Government might fairly be asked to assist by a contribution. Whether that contribu- tion should be by continuing and making over an assessed tax ou carriages for the purpose, or by making a direct pro rata grant from the imperial exchequer, derived from the ordinary sources, was a question of detail ; he should, on the whole, prefer the latter. He apologised for spe aking at so much length, but he desired to show that the matter was by no means a simple and easy one, which could be settled by a few axioms, and that other considerations were involved than those which appeared on the surface. The motion was carried unanimously. STOCK SHORTHORNS AND CLYDESDALES AT KEIR. The property of Sir W. Stirling Maxwell, M.P. BULLS. Lord Errant, roan, calved 16th August, 1873, by Mr. Booth's Banner Bearer.— Sir W. Gordon Cuinming, of Altyre, 63 gs. Banner Keeper, roan, calved 16th Sept., 1873, by Mr. Booth's Banner Bearer. — Viscount Strathallan, 35 gs. Fawsley, roan, calved 2nd Feb., 1874., by Keir Butterfly 9th, — Mr. A. Scott, Towie-Barclay, 61 gs. Master Towneley, white, calved 2ith Aug., 1873, by Keir Butterfly 0th. — Mr. Menzies, TuUochville, Si gs. Cherry Prince, red, calved 12th Jan., 1874', by Keir Butterfly 9th.— Mr. Fleming, Coates, 28 gs. Dalzell, red, calved 22nd June, 1874., by Mr. Booth's Banner Bearer. — Mr. Currie, llalkerton, 38 gs. Flower Lad, roan, calved 2ith Dec, 1873, by Keir Butterfly 9th.— Mr. Michell, Greenyards, 28 gs. HEIFERS. Banner Lass, red and white, calved 3rd May, 1873, by Mr. Booth's Banner Bearer.— Mr. Cruickshank, Sittyton, 35 gs. Lady Melville, red, calved 27th July, 1873, by Red Duke (29731).— Mr. Cruicksliank, 38 gs. SALES. Rose Flower, roan, calved 2ud Nov., 1873, by Mr. Booth's Banner Bearer. — Col. Williamson, of Lawers, 70 gs. Isabella, roan, calved 10th Sept., 1873, by Mr. Booth's Banner Bearer. — Mr. Campbell, Kinnellar, 29 gs. Banner Maid, red, calved 26th April, 1874, by Mr. Booth's Banner Bearer. — Mr. Cruickshank, 50 gs. CLYDESDALES. Bay filly, two years old, by Sir R. Bruce. — Col. Williamson 131 gs. Brown filly, two years old, by Conqueror. — Mr. Riddel', Kil- bowie, 55 gs. Bay filly, one-year-old, by Mr. Riddell's Old Times.— Mr. Riddell, 82 gs. Bay filly, one year-old, by Prince of Wales or Old Times. — Mr. Riddell, 43 gs. Brown filly, one-year-old, by Flower of Monteith. — Mr. Riddell, 35 gs. Brown filly, foaled 22nd April, 1874, by the Keir horse Derby. — Mr. Campbell, 41 gs. Bay filly, foaled 13th May, 1874, by the Keir horse Derby. — Mr. Whyte, Clintetty, by Aberdeen, 44 gs. Brown filly, foaled 30th May, 1874, by the Keir prize horse Newstead. — Mr. Marr, Cairnbrogie, 47 gs. Bay colt, foaled 27th April, 1873, by the Keir horse Newstead. —Mr. Riddell, 92 gs. THE FAEMER'S MAGAZINE. 489 Bay colt, foaled Iflth April, 187i, by tie Keir liorse Derby. — Mr. Smith, Castlemains, 61 gs. Bay colt, foaled 19th May, 1874, by the Keir horse Derby. — Mr. Riddel!, 30 gs. Brown colt, foaled 6th May, IST-l, by the Keir horse Derby. — Mr. Marr, 50 gs. Brown coU, fouled 9th May, 187-t, by the Keir prize horse Newstead.— Mr. Swan, Moat Mill, 31| gs. • Grey filly, loaled 21st May, 1871', by the thorough-bred horse Mesmer. — Mr. W. Forrest, AUauton, 18 gs. Sixty slieep, Leicester tup lambs, ranged from £1 to £4 15s.; average, £2 Is. 2d. 31 ewe lambs, in lots of two, brought from £1 to £i 153.; average, £2 Gs. 9d. 0 cast ewes fetched from 17s 6d. to £2 7s. Od. Two fancy black sheep (tup and ewe) brought £t 15s. each. A number of pigs from prize breeds sold at prices ranging from £1 lOs. to £6 17s. 6d. MR. MARR'S SHORTHORN BULLS AT UPPER- MILL, N.B. — The total proceeds of the sale amounted to £1,113, giving an average price for 31 animals of £35 18s., which is £6 Is. 6d. per head more than the prices of last year. LORD CHESHAM'S SALE OF JERSEYS AT LATL MER, ON OCTOBER THE 29tii, BY SEDGWICK AND SON. — Lord Cheshara has for many years paid great attention to the Jerseys as a dairy stock. Mr. Fowler supplied good animals long since, and there were also purchasers at the sales of Mr. Selby Loundes, Mr. Danncey, and Mr. Duncan's stocks. Lord Braybrooke, whose Jersey herd has been in existence for man's allotted three score years and ten, dipped into the Latimer by using Cheshara, and a son of his went to Lord Dacre, who bred the Baron ; this bull took first prizes at the Royals at Cardiff and Hull, and left some capital whole-coloured calves ; but breeders were not for him, though his strength and masculine character would still make him useful as a stud bull. Mr. Wright, butcher bought him at 25gs. The cows were shown in a corner of tlie Park near the Dell Farm. Several were old and blemished and an impression prevailed they were a cull lot. Still on the whole there were some very good specimens, and they made respectable prices. The whole colour, which was a " French grey," was got by importing whole colours from the Island, but the produce came out with white marks, and Lord Chesham thinks the climate and soil had some influence. A portion only of the herd made a total of 833 guineas. There were 33 cows and heifer-calves, for which 7W guineas were realised. Of the other cows. Sunshine was purchased for 63 guineas for the foreign market, by Mr. Thornton, and Slender, by Mr. W. H.Smith,-M.P., for 50 guineas, while Dormouse, one of the Dauncey's, now going ou^ of fashion, made 4-0 gs. to the famous Mr. Mutton, of Brighton. In addition to the cows and heifers there were ten bulls and bull-calves, of which two were withdrawn. The otiier eight fetched but 89 guineas in all. THE LAW OF DISTEAINT FOR RENT. During a rather wild discussion down in Cornwall the other day on the tenure of laud, two important points were touched on which do not often receive so much attention as they should do in any consideration of this now popular subject. Mr. Symons denounced the law of distraint for rent and advocated its abolition ; and Mr. Grose said the system of tendering for farms was a very bad one, for as a rule, the landlords took the men who bid the highest prices. In Scotland, certaiuly, a movement against hypothec is forcing itself upon the legislature ; and, as we said last week, here in England we sutler from hypothec at least in a degree, or, as Mr. Symons puts it, from the law of distraint for rent. There can, indeed, be little question but that the iu- difference evinced by the majority of landowners and their agents as to any proposed improvement in the system of tenure may be traced to one or the other of these two causes. Were the prior claim for reut discountenanced, of course the practice of offering farms by tender would also drop through. One, in a word, depends on the other, as, however careless the landlord may be about the tenant's security, he is tolerably sure to keep a sharp eye on his own. With the law of distraint prevailing, the owner is naturally not so particular either as to the character or means of the occupier as he would be did he stand in the same share-and-share-alike position with other creditors. His guarantee under any altered state of things would be the actual ability in purse and person of the man with whom he treated, as it would be all to the higher of the contracting parties' interest that the other started on fair terms. This is so clear, that it becomes a question whether, as in Scotland, the movement in favour of the right to the tenant to his own invest- ments and against the landlord's prior claim for rent should not be worked simultaneously ? As it is, the applicant for a farm is pretty generally at the mercy of its proprietor, who, through his steward, dictates his own conditions ; and " if you do not choose to take it, somebody else will." It is highly probable that somebody else, who is not so careful in looking to his premises, may be in no respect so desirable a tenant, although he will be ready to agree to anything. On such a showing he is too often accepted simply because the landowner is ensured by the legislature against los3. If the new occupier continue to keep on so much the better, or if he fail he will not be allowed to go beyond his tether. An argument is occasioully offered that while the law of distraint exists a tenant will have more time to make use of the money, or as Mr. Major put it at Bodmin, " if the law of distraint were done away with my tenants would pay quarterly instead of yearly." The receipt, however, of a farm rent only once in the twelve months is surely very exceptional, if the payment of one half- year only when another is due be more common. Of course, such a plea as this — the use of another's capital — applies almost altogether to the needy man who would be swept away with its abolition as he has been if not created encouraged by the law of distraint. Under a more equitable and wholesome tenure the loan of half-a- y ear's rent should be no very weighty consideration, as the direct influence of any alteration would be the en- listment of men who could find their own money. As Mr. McNeel Caird said at the Scottish Chamber last week, " With the best tenant-farmers in Scotland, it is not the rent that troubles them ; give them just security, do away with the artificial hindrances which hamper their industry, and they will not quarrel with the rent." In a word, we should by removing these artificial hindrances estahlish a better class of tenants and a better system of farming. In a strictly commercial sense nothing could sound much worse than the law as it now stands. Men get into possession of farms mainly because they are willing to make bad bargains, and the owner and the occupier play a game at chances. But the risk here is not equal ; for the landlord is playing with the money of other people, as he pays himself in full first out of a pool to which others have contributed, so soon as the tenant cannot put down his own stake. This game is called the Law of Dist- raint : while in another variety of the same amusement one of the players stakes his money without any rule which will ensure him a fair opportunity of ever getting it back again. And this game is known as Blind Confidence, lu fact, in either case the landlord takes a very similar position to that of the Emperor of China, who when he I I ^0 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. sits down to whist exercises the privilege of never naming trumps until he has seen his hand. Palpably there are great difficulties in the waj^ of any reform here ; as nothing would promise to create more indignation, either in the House of Commons or at the Chamber of Agriculture, than any proposal for the aboli- t'on of the law of distraint. The tenant-right cry is terrible enough in a landlord's ear, but the very mention of any tampering with his prior claim would be some- thing cvervvhelming. Still we do not despair of his being educated up to the one or the other ; and as Scot- land is fast following us on the way to a tenant-right, so must we watch her attack on the abuses of hypo- thec. BARLEY OR WHEAT MALT. Avery remarkable change is about to take place in the history of agriculture, consequent on the change in the value of English wheat and barley. This may be partly owiug to a deficient crop of barley, but still more to the total inadequacy of other sources of supply. On the other hand, the importations of wheat have been so liberal, and our own crop also so large, that the best red wheat is selling below the best malting barley, the one being quoted at 48s., and the other at 46s. per qr. Formerly the relative normal value of barley seldom exceeded two-thirds that of wheat, and it must have been a bad crop indeed that would bring the two products near upon a par, or change to any large eitent their relative values on the market. Such, how- ever, are the transpositions produced by, first, the in- crease of the population, and secondly, the duty- free importations of all kinds of articles of consumption. Amongst these the new market prices of wheat and barley are in every respect the most remarkable, when we consider the intriiisic value of each, and that the open market of the whole world furnishes supplies. Such, however, is the scarcity of malting barley, that, with all our sources of supply from both the old and new worlds, so great is the increased demand for beer, that our brewers are again using enormous amounts of sugar or molasses as the readiest and most economic article offering itself. But the mere 2?. per qr. plus on barley does not represent all the difference between the actual relative values of the two products. The weight of the best red wheat may be reckoned at 641bs. per bushel whilst that of the best barley is no more than C71bs. making a difference of 71bs. per bushel, or 561bs. per qr., which, if the weight of the wheat is assimilated to that of the barley, will reduce the value of the one to the ex- tent of 63. — that is, 4561bs. of wheat sell for only 38s. per qr., whilst the same weight of the best barley fetches 48s. — an anomaly in commerce which never occurred until the present season. There is, however, another question to be considered in the matter — namely, the materials of which the two products are composed, and how near the quality of wheat- malt approaches to that of barley-malt. This is a most important part of the subject, and one that can only be solved by experiment and chemical analysis. The amount of saccharine matters is greater, we believe, iu wheat than in barley, and the specific gravity is greater. If such be correct, a denser kind of liquor will be the result, and, therefore, a greater facility of producing intoxication; but this is partly conjecture, which, perhaps, some of our readers may be able to confirm or confute. We have certainly no reliable data to enable us to give an opinion on this part of the subject; still, it is important, because on the quality of the product in beer, and the quantity a certain proportion of wheat-malt may yield of given strength, depend any continued use ; as, of course, there is further the flavour to be considered. "VVe have started this question, because in France a good deal of wheat-malt has already been made, and the malt- sters appear to be going into the trade rather largely ; some also in our own country, whilst wheat is so low and barley so high in price, are disposed to try it. The ques- tion then remains. Is it probable or possible that wheat will coutiuue at so low or barley relatively at so high a price as to enable the maltsters to use wheat for barley ? This is a matter which only time can determine, but towards the solution of which we may throw out a few hints. First, it is tolerably certain that the growers of barley abroad are large competitors for producing the best malting barley ; and secondly, it is as certain that the United Kingdom cannot, either at home or abroad, supply one-half of the demands of lier own breweries. Thirdly, can the cultivation of barley at home be increased by substituting that grain for wheat or other grain ? Fourthly, is the importation ot foreign wheat likely to continue and inci'case? and are the cultivators and merchants of Russia and America so satisfied both with present prices, and with the certain prospect of a market for any amount they may have to spare, so as to induce them to cultivate wheat expressly for the English market at all times and under any fluctuations in price? The last query would look to be very easily answered. The value of land in those two countries is small, and readily attainable, while the cultivation of wheat, the principal produce, is grown in so primitive a manner, that there is always an excess of the home demand; and since England has become a customer to be depended on, the supply of wheat has, from the United States, been increased in proportion to the expected demand. In boih Russia and the United States, however, a good deal depends upon the charges for carrying the grain to the ports ; especially is this the case in America, where during the last year some of the railways charged the value of two bushels for the conveyance of one bushel to the nearest shipping port. CASTLE-DOUGLAS HORSE FAIR. — The show of horses numbered about 200, and was the finest that has been seen at Castle-Douglas at a Martinmas fair for many years. Good horses were in fair demand, but inferior were diffioUt to sell, and brought prices from 3 to 5 per cent, lower than those current at the Rood Fair. Few farmers were seeking horses, and the most of the business done was among dealers. Messrs. R. and A. Johnstone showed a splendid stud of 60, and sold 30. They sold a beautiful four-year-old, purchased from Mr. Hunter, Deaths, to Mr. H. Crawford, at £110; two to Mr. Carselaw, Mearns, at £190 ; a mare at £70 to Sir Wm. Max- well, of Cardoiipss; a two-year-old colt to Mr. Brown, Ingleston, at £80 ; a liorse at £95 to Mr. Yuille, Glasgow ; and upwards of twenty others at from £fO to £75. Mr. T. Currie disposed of the whole of his stud of seventeen. He bought a grey mare from Mr. Rigg, Banks, at £140, wliich he resold to Mr. Thomas Clark, Mearns, at £150. He sold a two-year-old colt at £fio, a chesnut mare to Mr. Riddell, Kilbowie, at £85, three to Mr. John Brown, Biggar, at £70 eich, a one-year-old filly to Mr. John Crawford, Beith, at £43 ; and others at lower prices. Mr. M. Teeuan had also a fine string oT draught and harness-horses, and sold a number at prices similar to the above. THE FARMER' fe MAGAZINE. 491 THE MANCHESTER AND SALFORD FAT STOCK SHOW. IN THE POMONA GARDENS. With a fat stock sliov? already established ia Mau- caciter just about Christmas time, it is a question whether this earlier exhibitiou v>'as e\xr required, as certainly the result does not say much for the experiment so (at. Tu many of the leading features of such a meeting it was a most unmistalvable failure. There were in all eight HereforJs entered to compete ia five classes, and these were so generally in- differeut that not one fust prize was awarded ; and the judges consequently rcfusiid to admit of such a thing as a " best Hereford." There were in all three Devons entered, and in the outset the management proposed to throw over these classes altogether by returning the exhibitors their fees, but eventually the animals were allowed to come on, when Mr. Senior's ox, which has now been kuockiug about the country for the last two years, won. In fact, amongst the cattle the only creditable display centred over the Short- horns and the Scotch or Scotch crosses. ^Messrs. Fresh- ney, fi-om Lincolnshire, made their mark with a Short- horn ox, bred by Mr. Wells, of Withern, which was not only the best of his class, and the best Shorthorn but the best of all the oxen or steers ; the actual awards in his class being strengthened by commendations to Mr, E. J. Howard, Nocton Rise, Lincoln ; Jlr. A. H. Browne. Doxford, Chathill, Northumberland; and Jlr. Thomas Elliott, Hiudhope, Jedburgh. Only one commendation, to ilr. J. II. Stephenson, was appended to the three prizes in the three-year-old class; while the open class of cows included two or three well-known show animals, ilr. Wells' cow now beating Moss Rose, as we contended she should have done at Northampton ; but Mr. Wright's heifer, first at Northampton, was first again here, as she has also been in Lincolnshire, and, as we have written of her, always sure to be heard of in good company. There was a fair show of polled Scots, with Messrs. Martins' ox as the champion; but only two or three Highlanders and a good speciii;: n of the Shorthorn and Poll cross shown by JMr, Adauioon from Alford, backed by Mr. Staffer's cross-bred cow, pronounced to be the best cow or heifer in the show. There were only two exhibitors of Southdown sheep, two of Oxfords, none of Uampslsires, and noneof Lincolns. Lord Walsiugham took all the three prizes against his veteran opponent Lord Sondes, who was highly commended for both pens ; while the Mertou flock will not be repre- sented at Birmingham, as the extra premiums for South- downs have this year been struck out of the Biugley ilall list. A solitary ewe did duty for the Cotswolds, but there was really a respectable entry — as things went here — of Sbropshires, where Lord Chesham was still invincible, al- though Mrs. Beach was so close up that a referee had to be called iu. The competition iu the pig classes was often very limited, noticeably cnougli one of the best filled being that of Bsrkshires, which seem to be taking root in Lancashire and Cheshire. There were further premiums for cora and roots, with an exhibition of implements, often enough of an almost ludicrously '■miscellaneous" description, PRIZE LIST JUDGES.— R. Woods, Osberton, Worktop; W. Cropper, Minting House, llorncastle ; ¥. Lytball, Offchurch, Leam- ington; T. H. Hutchinson, Manor House, Calterick ; T. Dodds, Waliefield; J. Lynn, Stroxtoii, G.auihara ; J. Fislier, Carrhead, Leeds ; W. Lort, Kind's Norton ; B. Baxter, Elslack Hall, Skipton ; II. V. Grantham, West Iveal Hall, Spilsby ; J. Downham, Bury ; W. Hewett, Chester ; J. Bradlev, Leeds ; J. Hicken, Duachurch, Riuby ; 11. T. Smith, Wiiitchurch ; T. Rigby, Winsford, Ciiesliire ; A. Mills, Heywood ; R. Tait, Manchester. CATTLE, IIEREFORDS. Ox or steer of any age exceeding three year? and three months old. — first prize, withheld ; second, £10, S. Miller, The Court, Abcrraule ; third, £5, R.Everall, Woolaston Hall, Lcebotwood. Steer, not exceeding three years and three mouths old. — First prize, withheld ; second, £10, R. Heigbway, Lea Cross, Shrewsbury ; third, £5, R. Wortley, Aylsham. Steer, not exceeding two years aad sis months old. — First prize, withheld ; second, £10, R. Heighway. Heifers. — Third prize, £5, R. Wortley. SHOIITHORNS. Oxca or steers of any age exceeding three years and tiiree Miontbs.— First prize, £50, T. and J, B. Freshney, S:tltll.'et, Louth ; second, £10, T. Lund, Monk Bar, York ; tbird, £5, T. H. Ferris, Mauningford, Marlborougli. Steer, not excoding three years an i tliree months old. — First prize, £20, R.^Worlley, Aylsham; second, £10, E. Wortley, Ridlington ; tliird, J. Outhwaite, B;iinesse. Steer, not exceeding four years old, bred and fed by a ten- ant-farmer.— First prize, £1-5, J. Cran, Kirkton, luverness ; second, £10, J. Nicholson, AVilloughtoa Grange, Kirtou-in- Lindsey ; third, £5, J. Nicholson. Cows. — First prize, £15, Earl of Faversham ; second, £10, W. T. Welti, Withern Hall, Alford, Lincolnshire ; tliird, £5, 0. Bennion, Cresswell, Stafford, Heifers.— First prize, £15, R. Wright, Nocton Heath, Lincoln ; second, £10, T. Staitor, Stand ; third, £5, E. Liddell, jMorris ilall, Norham, Northumberland. DEVOTES. Cup, 50 guineas, for best Devon, T. L. Senior, Aylesbury ; second prize, £10, R. H. Harris, EarnhiU, Forres, N.B. Cows or heifers. — Second prize, £10, T. L. Senior. SCOTCH ]3REE1)S. Polled oxen or steers of auy age. — First prize, £50, J. and \V. Martin, New Market, Aberdeen ; second, £10, Sir W. G. Gordon Cumraiug, Altyne Towers. West Highland oxen or steers. — First prize, £20, and second, £10, T. Statter. Cows or licifcrs. — First prize, £15, Sir W. C. Trevelyan ; second, £5, T. L. M. Cartwright, Melville House, Lady bank, Fife. PUKE-IiREEDS AND CROSS-BRED ANIilALS. Oxen.— First prize, £50, H. D. Adamson, Balquliorne, Alford, Aberdeenshire; second, £10, T. L. Senior. Fat steers under three years old. — First prize, £20, W. M'Corabie, M.P., Tillyfour, Aberdeen ; second, £10, J. Cron, Kirkton. Fat cov?s or heifers. — First prize, £20, T. Statter ; second, £10, J. and W. Martin, New Market, Aberdeen. Extra Stock. — Bull, cow, or heifer, of any age, breed, or variety, aud not necessary to be fat stock. — First prize, £10, G. Fox, Hare Field, Wilraslow (Leeman) ; second, £5, and third, £3, T. Statter. Cup of 50 gs, for best ox or steer, Messrs. Freshney (Short- Itoru). Cup of 50 g$. for beat cow or lieifer, Mr. Statter (cross), SHEEP. Cheviot wether?, three years old. — First prize, £15, 'Jli Duke of Rosburghe ; second, £10, J. M'Gill, Rotchill, Dnni fries. Cheviot wethers, net exceeding twenty-three months old. — Fir^t prize, £10, R. H. Dwire, Barney Mains, Haddington, N.B. ; second, J. M'Gill. Southdown wethers, not exceeding t.veuty. three month old First, second, and third prizes, lord WahingiKihi. I I 2 4P2 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE Shropshire wethers, not exceeding twenty-three months old. — First prize, £15, Lord Chesham ; second, Sarah Beach ; t'l rd, F. Bach, Craven Arms, Salop. Sliropshire wether. — First prize, Lord Chesham. i'en of three fat Oxfordshire wethers. — First and second prizes, G. Street, Maulden, Ampthill; third, N. Stilgoe, Ad- derbury, Oxon. Slieep not qualified to compete in other clases. — First prize, W. and G. Bird, Taunton ; second. The Duke of Portland. Cross Breeds : Pen of three fat wethers. — First prize, J. Christie, Whittingham, West Morris, Haddington; second, N. Stilgoe. Cotswold ewe. — Silver medal, J. Wheeler, Long Compton, Shipston-on-Stour. Southdown ewe. — Silver medal. Lord Sondes, Elrahara. S iropshire Ewe. — Silver medal, S. Beach. Kwes of any pure breed. — Silver medal, R. H. Harris, Earn- hill, Forres Border (Border Leicester.) PIGS. For the best collection of breeding pigs. — Champion cup, the Earl of Ellesmere, whose pens obtained 119 points, against Mr. P.Eden's pen of 117 points. Large breed : Pen of five pigs of one litter, exceeding three and not exeeding six months old. — First prize, £10, and second, £5, P. Eden. Pigs of the middle breed, five of one litter, exceeding three end not exceediug six months. — First prize, £10, P. Eden. For collection of breeding pigs, being the Ijo/ia fide pro- perty of the exhibitor.~A cup, value 25 gs., the Earl of Elles- mere. Pen of three fat pigs of one litter, not exceeding ten months old.— Prize, £10, P. Eden, Cross-lane, Salford. Pen of three fat pigs of one litter, not exceeding 15 months old. — First prize, £10, and second, £5 P. Eden. Fat pig, exceeding 15 months old. — First prize, £6, the Earl of Ellesmere ; second, £4, Colonel C. Towneley, Towneley, Burnley. Breeding pigs of the Berkshire breed : pen of five pigs of one litter, exceeding three and not exceeding six months old, — First prize, £10, H. llumfrey, Kingstone Farm, Shrivenham- Berks; second, £5, J. Wlieelcr, Long Compton, Sliipston-on. Stour; third, £3, A. Stewart, St. Bridge, near Gloucester. LAND TENURE. Ai a meetiilg of the Cornwall Chamber of Agriculture held in Bodmin, Sir Colman Ilashleigh, Bart,, M.P., who was voted to the chair, announced that he had received letters from John St. Aubyn, Bart., M.P., Mr. John Tremayne, M.P., and Mr. Jonathan Rashleigh, expressing regret at iuability to attend. Mr. Tremayne added — " It is a subject to which the attention of Parliament will shortly be drawn; and it would have been an advantage to me to have heard the opinion of my constituents." He (the cliairraan) agreed with his col- league in thinking that the subject, and in fact the wholo question of land, was one whicli must occupy the attention of Parliament very shortly — probably in the coming session ; and he also fully agreed in thinking it was one on which it was des-irable that he should hear tiie opinions of I'.is constituents. He was glad that the matter bad been taken up by such an able agriculturist as Mr, Olver, but he would not yet express an opinion in regard to it. He should be very sorry to make up liis mind, or to declare prematurely his opinions on such an important matter as the subject of land — not only the tenure of land, but the transfer of land and the present lawj relating to the land. They were matters, in his opinion, re- quiring the greatest possible consideration, especially at the hands of those who had the honour of representing the large landed |interest8 of the country. He should listen to the remarks made that day, and from tlie remarks made there and elsewhere he should make up his mind as to what course to take as their member of Parliament ; but it would be wrong and premature for him to express any opinion at all until he had heard the subject talked over and argued out. Mr. Olver read the following paper : Few questions are of greater importance than this which I have chosen for your con- sideration, and designated The Tenure oj Land. This question, which has been so frequently ventilated of late, is evi- dently in a very unsatisfactory state ; a circumstance to be universally regretted, since wills resulting tiierefrom are not confined to landlords and tenants, but extend to the community at large. "The first condition in every State is the plough," and something must be wrong in any State, particularly one possessing abundance of capital, if it cannot be profitably employed in cultivating a fertile soil like that of Great Britain, while so mucii inferior food is annually imported from abroad to feed its inhabitants. Such, however, is the state of this country at present. One cause of the commemorative con- dition of agriculture, when compared with other industrial pur-uits in this country, is undoubtedly the undue burdens laid on the landed interest iu the shape of rates and taxes, which ought to have been considerably reduced when the Corn- laws were repealed and the British agriculturist had to meet " all comers" with his hands tied. In the absence of that relief, however, a great stimulus would be given to agricul- tural progress by an understanding between landlord and tenant, calculated to afford security to capital invested in proving the land ; since many capitalists, now that agricul- ture is become such a fashionable occupation, would readily invest in cultivating land belonging to other people, having no opportunity to purchase ; but they are generally too shrewd to do so without security, feeling that the profits arising from agriculture would be small under the most favourable circum- stances. Mucli has been said here from time to time respect- ing the legal points affecting tiiis question ; I will not, there- fore, waste your time by dilating on them, nor in taking you back to that primitive state of agriculture when occupiers of land had nothing to offer the owners but suit and service ; but will as briefly as possible, with the view of promoting dis- cussion, point out some of the many inconsistences connected with the tenure of hind. Landowners. — The first persons to be mentioned are landlords, by which I mean extensive owners of land ; and amongst them, like mankind in general, there are good, bad, and indifferent, varying in character and position. Some do their duty in the station it lias pleased God to place tbem, by taking an interest in their own affairs and trying to make all with whom they are associated prosperous and happy, remembering that " Property has its duties as well as its rights ;" while others appear to treat those matters with indifference. Some are wealthy and affluent, while others are poor ; consequently, incapable of doing the good they wo'jld. But life is uncertain with all : hence the necessity of preparing for these changes which death might produce, when another Pharoah might come in who knew not Joseph. Tlie place of the first-mentioned worthy might be filled by some well-meaning, but arrogant military officer, taking no interest jin rural afi'airs and expecting the same amount of homage from his tenantry as he has been accus- tomed to receive from the troops under his command, which must lead to unpleasantness, and probably impede the progress of agriculture without previous security of tenure. Leases.— Leases are generally provided for the purpose of security or protecting the intevest of both landlord and tenant in Corn- wall, but unfortunately many of them are ill-adapted to the age in which we live, being in many instances mere copies, with slight alterations, of those made by lawyers, having no knowledge of agriculture, perhaps centuries ago. I once heard the prin- cipal clerk in an attorney's office say that he had frequently pointed out to his employers the inconsistency of these leases, but the reply he invariably received was, " If we make altera- tions we siihll probably make mistakes ; so it is better to let matters remain as they are." Each tenant was therefore ex- pected to sign and pay for this antiquated document, irrespec- tive of the character and situation of the farm ; and I fear that sucli cases are not uncommon iu this enlightened age. Lease making under these circumstances is very profitable to the lawyer, and I know of no other reason why men of straw- are so frequently taken as tenants in preference to meu of capital. It is true the former sometimes offei more, and fictious'y augment the rent-roll while they rack the farm. Lawyers are qualified to receive rents and draw leases, but not THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 493 to lay down rules for the managemrnt of farms ; that should be submitted to a practical land agent. Now a practicnl land ageut is a very important personage in connection with tliis question. He should have a thorougli knowledge of agricul- ture, the construction of farm buildings, and the draining of land. Tenants would not then be required to adopt systems of cultivation in tlie fickle, humid climate of Cornwall which would be suitable to the dry Midland and Eastern Counties ; buildings would be more judiciously constructed on some do- mains, and drains would not be made so shallow under his supervision as to become choked with the roots of vegetables. Land agents should be affable in manner, so that tenants might at all times make known their complaints ; and possess sulli- cient independence to decide justly any disputed question that might arise between landlord aud tenant. We have many such men in Cornwall : would that we had more. jMy obser- vations are not, however, confined to this county. Wherever such men are in office, 1 invariably find liberal landlords and improving tenantry ; but when empirical tyrants occupy this important position llie reverse is generally the case. " Birds of a feather flock together." Agriculture is not so profitable an occupation as to enable the farmer to stand up against oppression ; on the contrary, it is so precarious as to require great forbearance and encouragement. Many enterprising tenants have sustained such losses through adverse seasons at the commencement of a terra, that they would have been ruined had it not been for the kind forbearance of their laud- lord, brought about by the instrumentality of a confidential land steward. The Idthirj and holding of land. — There are different modes of letting laud in this country. The first I would mention is one frequently adopted in various parts of this kingdom, where landowners look upon their tenants as members of their family, and transmit to them the land occu- pied by their ancestors at a fair yearly rent, adopting the motto, " Live and let live." No comment is required on this happy state of things. I envy the parties concerned. Yearly tenancy, however, in the general acceptation of the term, sub- ject to six months' notice to quit, is objectionable even when the tenant is allowed for unexhausted improvements ; as when this uncertainty exists men are not so likely to effect improve- ments as when they have a long term under a lease. Besides, where that system prevails, parties frequently take farms for the express purpose of getting what they can out of tiiem, and leaving at the end of a year or two — a system pernicious in its effects, and one that ought to be discouraged. Yearly tenancy is not without its advantages, however, over a lease, when a person for the sake of convenience takes a larm that docs not suit him, which frequently occurs. The system which 1 have long advocated for the occupation of land is a liberal progressive lease, with corcpeusatiou on quitting for unexhausted improvements, by which I mean such im- provements as are calculated to enhance the renting value of the farm, at which no landowner can justly complain. When farms are offered to be let for a term of years I strongly recommend that the rent be named : the system of letting by tender is objectionable in many respects, as persons frequently olfer rents which tbey never intend to pay, and when they get possession stipulate for a lower sum than was offered by a more deserving tenant, and one that owner would have pre- ferred. Others through ignorance offer rent beyond the value of the farm, which places the laud agent in an awkward ):osition, the temptation being too great lor many landowners. Moreover young farmers become discouraged by this unjust and undue competition, aud seek other occupations at home or abroad. — Leases : Many clauses in existing leases are pre- udicial to the interest of landlords, tenants, and the com- muniiy at large. The first I shall mention is that prohibiting the sale of hay aud straw, and other produce of tlie land ; this might have been produced prior to the intrduction of artificial manures aud railways. One can hardly suppose that the intelligent landowners of Cornwall will now stand so much in their own light, as to allow the vast number of horses era- ployed in this county, where abundance of hay, stra^v, and roots are grown to be supplied with fodder and litter from other counties. Can they be ignorant of the fact that land in populous districts where tenants are at liberty to sell these commodities lets at higher rent in consequence, while with iQ'fi exceptions the landlords of Cornwall prohibit their sale. liow olten does one see near a railway station ricks of straw rotting in the field, the residue of which is not worth lUs. a ton as a manure, while it could readily le tiispoied of at 5Us. a ton. No agriculturist knowinghisbusiness will now cultivate land without manuring it, and manure is abundant. In ouler then t'lat land may fetch the maximum rent, or yield the greatest amount of produce, those absurd restrictions must be removed from leases, its occupiers be at liberty to buy in the cheapest market aud sell in the dearest. Restrictions in tb.e cultivation of land should be few, as seasons will beat any man's judgment, but tenants should be amenable to landlords on quitting farms. Some leases, although apparently liberal, are subtle and delusive. A ciicumstance came to my know- ledge a lew years since where a tenant was simply bound to farm according to the rules of good husbandry, but subject to a fine of £10 an acre if he failed to do so. In consequence of 'he land being over-run with rabbits, unpleasantness arose between the tenant and keeper, so that the tenant decided on quitting the farm, when, in accordance with his lease be vv;.a charged £200 for thee mismanagement of 10 acres of laid which had become foul through rabbits destroying his culti- vated crops. A more daring atlcmpt of might to overcon.e rigiit never came under my notice. The tenant, however, successfully resisted it, though at considerable expense. These accursed vermin, rabbits, have caused more discord bet«£cu landlords and tenants, aud have been a greater bane to agri- cultural progress than all other things. My object in readiug this paper is to show that a long lease with compensation for the tenant on quitting, is calculated to afford gretter security for invested capital than a yearly tenancy. It is not intended, however, that this lease shall interfere with existing laws affecting the interest of landlord and tenant or those that may in future be enacted, any clause in a lease contraiy to these laws should be ineffectual. For instance, no clause should prevent tenants from destroying hares and rabbits, as they by law belong to him. I have avoided touching tho-e questions so ably introduced at this Chamber by my friend Mr. Snell, cordially agreeing with him, that the proposed Landlord and Tenant Acts will not be worth the paper it is printed on if the twelfth clause be struck out. Many minor questions respecting leases might be considered, but 1 greitly prefer having the opinions of gentlemen present so capable of expressing them, and with these brief remarks I con- clude. The CHAIPMA.N saw present the land-steward to Sir Charles Sawle — Mr Stokes — whom he should be glad to hear. Mr. Stokes said that in his unfortunate profession |he g( t many kicks and no half-pence. He never granted a lease without consulting his land-agent, and then going through tlie points which related to the particular farm. There were now, however, many lawyers who studied agriculture, and were good farmers. He did not believe they would ever get the landlords of that county to do without leases ; for though there was no doubt that the tenants were honourable men, who might be trusted implicitly, yet he bad known tenants who could not be trusted. He believed in many leases there were clauses which were unnecessary, and which were never canicd into effect. The words, "according to the rules of good hus- bandry," were very vague, and only lately he had occasion to re-open the question and decide what those rules were. He believed there were now very few yearly leases. He would like a little information concerning the disposal of hay and grass. Where there \\ere good landlords covenants were not of much use. Mr. Olver said the more liberal the covenants under which land was let the greater would be the rent. Straw might olteu be disposed of to tlie advantage of the tenant, who might pay a higher rent, and be allowed to accommodate neighbours who wanted straw. When they saw the immense quantity of manure which was carried back to replace the s'raw that had been taken away, they could not but think the change was a profitable one. A lease should be a practical lease, and a lawyer without any knowledge on the subject was not the person to draw up a lease. Two years before a tenant Itik a farm certain conditions should be agreed on, so that the incoming tenant should have something on the farm vtlien he came. Mr. Ai LAN SON thought that in popular questions like this the majority was not always correct, for people were often led by zeal withont discretion, selfishness without reference to justice, and a jumping to conclusions without analysis. He believed that they had not so much to complain of as they thought, for in the past forty years he had seen more instances where the landlord had cause to complain of the tenant ibau 494 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. the tenant had of the landlord, though he did know of a few cases where there had beea injustice on the part of the land- lord. Leases were not intended to be carried out, aud it was a diflicult thing to get a fair, common-sense lease. If the leases did not interfere with them as tenant-farmers, they ought to be satisfied. There was a good deal of moonshine and senti- mental work connected witli the question. Tiie tenant-farmers of Cornwall were not worse than the yeomen. That sliowed they were good farmers. He believed that, as a body, they were satisfied with the landlords, wlio for the most part were just men. During thirty or forty years he had known a few run from their word ; but if they were to have a change ia consequence of this, he might as well have ii legal docu- ment in every transaction he had. He believed that nineteen out of twenty had no fear of their landlords acting dishonour- ably towards them. If they had a 90 years' lease he believed they would not farm better than they did now, nor would they farm better than they did now if they had a lease made out to their owe liliing. He was, t!:erefore, at a loss to see what change was wanted. The six months' notice to quit was, he confessed, a mere farce. When they talked about Tenant-Right he believed tiiat it would be a long time be!ore they saw a measure which would be satisfactory to 'andlord and tenant. If the bills that had been submitted to Parliament were passed he believed there would be no end of litigation. By the late bills they could take money from a good tenant, but, if he were a bad farmer, they could get nothing from him. The land which was good 40 years ago was good now, and the bad was still bad ; the surface might be improved or deteriorated, but the subsoil would remain the same. He believed that the tenants as a body had confidence in their landlords, who were fair men. Mr. Henry Stmonds denounced the law of distraint, and advocated its abolition. lie wanted to know why there were leases at all, if, as was said, they were virtually nullities. Mr. Magok, said, so far as he was concerned as a land- owner, he should be willing to do away with the law of dis- traint if his tenants would pay him quarterly instead of yearly. He believed in a long take. He advocated the anion of land- lord and tenant in endeavouring to secure good cottages for the labourers, and to give them a good education, which would make thera not mere machines, but men of good sense, who would know how to work their way through life. The tenant-farmer was not sufficiently secured. A man, when he went out of a business had money paid him for the goodwill, but the farmer had not. He believed iu the tenant, receiving compensation for unexhausted iraproveraeuts. There was a difticulty in the way, but it might be managed by arbitrators being appointed by a board of agriculture. Mr. Weslej' Gkose was at a loss to know what man would be such a thundering fool as to invest his capital in land if he had not got a lease. Two-thirds of the nonsense in the leasts should be left out. The lawyers should write half as much as they did now, and charge half the price. Mr. CoLLiNGS denied that lawyers were actuated solely by mouey-niaking motives. He could not believe that what was taken away in the shape of hay and straw from a farm would be corapeusated by tiie return of manure. Mr. Grose said the system of tendering for farms was a very bad one. As a rule the landowners took the men who bid the highest prices. Votes of thanks were passed to Mr. Olver aud to tho Chairman. MR. SEAVELL READ'S BUDGET. Mr. C. S. Read, M.P., has just addressed his consti- tuents at the Market Tea, Diss. Mr. Read said that the kind reception which he had met with that evening showed him that he had not forfeited the confidence of his constituents. It was, he thought, a great compliment to the tenant-farmers of Norfolk that one of their number should be in the Ministry, Some of his kind friends had said that they had not heard so much of him lately in Parliament, or seen his name so often in print : perhaps he was like the old lady's parrot, which when it did not talk was considered to be thinking all the more. If he had not spoken very much in the House of Commons, he had voted much more frequently than he had ever done before. He had voted some 130 or 140 times during the past session ; this Wjs double the number of times he had ever voted before in any one year, although he had always been a tolerably attentive member. He had made a calculation, and he found that he had to traverse eight miles in order to vote 140 times, and the voting also occupied some 35 hours, so that his time had been well and properly spent. The late hours of the House and the work of the days were, in fact, more tlian he had bargained for. He once read a tale of a man whose hair became «hite in the course of the night. One Session had turned his ov/n hair iron-grey ; and he believed that if he wcut on for another Session he should find his health rather worse than it was at present. However, a good heart would carry him through. He had no Government secrets to communi- cate, for the best of all reasons — that he did not know any. As regarded the next Session, he did not think that there would be anything sensational in the legislation attempted. Should a Bill be introduced to give legislative protection to the capital of the tenant, he was quite sure that the just rights and interests of the landlord would be properly regarded, although this was not the ease with the Irish Land Bill. Ho believed, however, that there would next Session be a useful amount of what might be termed domestic legislation, which really was very much wanted. Sir Henry Jaraes told his constituents the other day, at Taun- ton, that the Conservatives were not good administrators, and that even in regard to a Turnpike Bill, the Liberals would conduct it with greater precision, and a much better style, than the Conservatives. However, as such matters were generally arranged by the permanent officials, he did not think that there would be much differeuc.? found in the cou- duct of business either by the Conservatives or the Liberals. As he could not talk much about the future, perhaps he might he allowed to say a word or two on the past, and he thought that the must important matter of the Session was the Budget. Now, if he had been the Chancellor of the Exchequer — and perhaps it was fortunate for the country that he was not — the sort of Budget which he had sketched out for himself was somewhat like this : He should have repealed half the Malt- thx, and by this the country might have lost £3,500,000 in the first year, perhaps not so much iu the second year, while the remission of taxation might have recouped itself iu time ; but then, if he had done this, he should not have repealed the Sugar duties, and the repeal of those duties was a wise and beneficial measure, for the public were hardly aware of the extent of the restrictions which those duties imposed upon traders and merchants. As far as regards local taxation, he should have done exactly what the Ch':\ncellor of the Ex- chequer actually proposed. He should have left a jolly good' surplus to be dealt with as might be deemed expedient next year ; but he feared that taxpayers objected to pay taxes merely to make a surplus, and it must be remembered that a Chan- cellor of tiie Exchequer was always badgered from morning till night by deputations anxious to have a shtrc of any surplus which might exist. He should have taken the duty olf trades- men's horses, as horses were just as necessary to tradesmen in their trades as for those engaged in agriculture, but he did not know that he should have repealed the tax upon hunters or racehorses. W\th regard to game, he should have exempted a gun used by a farmer, whether lie carried it himself or lent it to his servant, lor the purpose of securing his crops. With regard to dogs, he thought it would be a very good thing in- deed if shepherds' dogs and dogs of a really useful character were exempted from taxation, but pleasure dogs ought to bo doubly taxed ; but he feared that all these ideas of his were quite contrary to the spirit of the age, and that they would not hold water in the House of Commons for one moment. It was therefore, perhaps, fortunate that he was not Chancellor of the Exchequer, because, if he had been, he should have destroyed his party, while he did not know that he should have pleased anybody. He was quite sure that a bud^cet like that which he had sketched out would not have passed the House of Commons. When he told the Central Chamber of THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 495 Agriculture that budgets were made, not to please or even to do justice to his political friends, but to pass the House of Coiumous, he was rather roughly handled ; but lie contended that a Chancellor of the Exchequer must propose a budget wliicii would pass the House ol? Commons, and the present Ciiancellor of the Exchequer had proposed a Budget wliich seemed to please the country generally. It must be remembered that in 1853 Mr. Disraeli pro- posed to repeal the Malt-tax, and the consequence was that Mr. Disraeli was turned out of office. If Mr. Disraeli could not obtain his object just after the Eree-trade system commenced, when the price of Barley was much lower than it was at present, and when promises had been made in abund- ance about the repeal of the Malt-tax, just after the impost duty on wheat had been taken off, how could it be possibly expected that the repeal of the Malt-tax could be carried now, when the price of barley was lower than wheat, and when people had forgotten all about the promises which they had made when a one-sided Eree-trade policy was introduced ? Another reason why the repeal of the Malt-tax could not be obtained was that most of the members were against it ; the brewers, with the noble exception of Mr. Bass, were against it ; and it must be remembered that there were 40 members of the House of Commons who were directly or indirectly con- nected with brewing. Then there was a formidable body of teetotal gentlemen, or supporters of the Alliance, who fancied that, were beer made cheap and pure, there would be more drunkenness. Perhaps he might be asked why, if he held these views, did he not vote with Mr. Eieldeu and his 17 followers ? His (Mr. Read's) hon. colleague. Sir R. J. Buxton, was the seventeenth of the supporters of Mr. Fielden ; and he (Mr. Read) should have made the eighteenth, only he happened to be in the Government, and he could not vote for an amendment to the Budget of the Government of which he was a member. As Col. Bartelot, who was the leader of the Malt-tax repealers in the House of Commons, actually voted with the Government, he (Mr. Read) thought that he had a very good excuse and justifica- tion for walking out of the House. The farmers must let the Malt-tax question stand over until the next election. The farmers started two hares, or, rather, two horses — one the repeal of the Malt-tax, and the otlier the remission of Local Taxation, and the Chancellor of the Exchequer had chosen a remission of Local Taxation, and had thereby pleased the country. He (Mr. Read) contended further that although the Budget might not be popular among farmers, still it was a plain, straightforward, and honest Budget. There were no feats of legerdemain about it, there were no five quarters brought into one year's revenue, no making the tax-payer pay taxes in advance so as to make a surplus, and no local process in regard to over-estimates of revenue or under-estimates of expenditure. The Budget of Sir Stafford Northcote was, in fact, an honest and honourable one, and upon the whole the best which could have been introduced by the Conservative Government. At a meeting of the Nor- folk Chamber of Agriculture he let fall a few words about county boards, when it was actually supposed that he was inspired by the Government to feel the pulse of the country on that question ; and it was also said that he was a convert to county Parliaments. Those who knew him must be aware tliat long before he entered Parliament he was in favour of county boards. He advocated them not for the purpose of interfering with the magistrates, who generally managed matters in quarter sessions economically and well ; but what he wanted to see was a good representative county authority, which should be the medium of making lecal self Government more a reality than at present, and for the purpose of checking the tyranny of the central authority. New boards were con- stantly being created, and new power conferred upon the central authority. This he greatly deprecated, and he would have a good county board to resist this central power and to make refractory districts do their duty to themselves and to the country. Of highway districts, he reminded them he was not authorised to say anything, but by the abolition of the turnpikes and the throwing of the expenses of that maintenance of roads upon the parishes, a great hardship had arisen. In that part of the country they did not like the idea of having highway boards ; but he was sorry to say the Central Chamber of Agriculture thought differently, for two to one voted in favour of a resolution that highway boards should be made compulsory. If it should be the duty of the Government to introduce a Highway Bill he would do his best to make it a good one. There must be some alteration, and although he had his ideas on the subject, it he found himself in a minority he would not stand tenaciously out for the adoption of his view, but try to produce the best legislation possible. He never could understand why, especially in rural districts, there was any necessity to have a new board ; for why should not the guardians act as way-wardens ? There was a clerk and other officials, except perhaps a surveyor ; but some people said the relieving oilieers would make good surveyors, and he believed they would make as good surveyors as some that had been appointed. THE RABBIT IN DEVON. Mr. Benjamin Butter Bastin, of Tidwell Barton, East Bud- leigh,'writes : Willyou permit me to give a fair description of the case which was brought before the Woodbury magistrates on Monday last. Robert Edwards has been iu my service as shepherd for nearly six years, and T can give him a good cha- racter for industry, honesty, steadiness, and truthfulness. Ho has a family of five children, and a wife daily expecting an increase. On Sunday, Oct. 25, having three colts and some calves at the higher ground, it was his daily duty to feed them with corn. On his return, walking in the pubHc road, he heard a rabbit cry. The two sheep dogs, which were more than fifty yards a-head, had caught it and were pulling it in pieces. He put it in his pocket, with the intention of inform- ing me of it, which he did on my return iu the evening. The rabbit was about six weeks old, and mangled. I told him to throw it away, and thought no more of it. Of course it would not do to allow dogs to eat rabbits, for fear of their learning to kill lambs ; but on Monday Edwards received an " invitation" to Woodbury. The magistrates convicted him, but I feel quite positive he was not trying to kill rabbits. Now, I wish to let the public — the consumers — know why the tenant-farmer is wishing for some legislative protection. Eleven years since I took this farm in a perfect state of ruin. All the fences down; with a large portion of the ground ploughed seven years before, and still lymg in rough furrows full of weeds, &c. I had nearly every fence on the estate made, but now they are just like a honey-comb with rabbit burrows. There are many tliou-^auds of rabbits on ray farm at the pre- sent time, and to prove this, I will quote only the damage done to my crops this season, for which the Hon. Mark RoUe will have to compensate me. The damage was valued by his own steward and bailiff — Messrs. Lipscombe and Sanders — and they awarded mc for damage done to corn alone, £120, being something like 400 bushels of wheat, at os. per bushel. In some fields as much as 20 bushels per acre were ('.estroyed. This sum awarded is only for what jthey t-rm " excessive" damage, as by a clause in my agreement, that is all I am en- titled to claim. A large amount of damage done to my root crops still remains to be valued. Close to where this unfortu- nate rabbit was killed, whole fields of turnips, &c., are entirely destroyed — not one single root left to tell the tale ! The damage, valued at harvest, is only the one visible ; but the larger amount is done when the corn and roots are in their in- fant state, and one rabbit will eat and destroy hundreds of turnips and mangolds iu a single night. A rabbit eats and destroys os. worth before it is worth Is. In the grass fields, where I have daily to keep my sheep to eat what little remains, the damage cannot be estimated. Having a young family around me, I think it better to hope the first loss will be the least, and consequently have given six months' notice to quit, which I do at Lady-day, considering myself driven from house and home by rabbits. I cannot work and lose my capital to preserve rabbits for the hon. baroness to make a market of. She sends the keeper to take oft'a few hundreds of the thickest of them now and then for market, allowing the others to breed again till the number is made up. William Lake and his donkey cart can be daily seen returning from Bicton with his load of rabbits to sell in the neighbourhood. The tenant is expected to witness all this with humble subjection, to cultivate his farm, pay his rent, breed and feed rabbits, aud be over- looked by such a keeper as the one who gave evidence in this case. He has been on my premises only twice; each time in a state of apparent intoxication, and very Abusive. Since I 496 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. have given notice the hon. baroness, no doubt, seeing the question of the rabbits is assuming an important position, has isued the following notice to the tenants : East Budleigh, B. Salternon, Oct. 9, 1874. Dear Sir, — I am directed by Mr. Rolle to say that Lady RoUe will give permission to the tenants on her South Devon property to kill rabbits on their respective farms, between the hours of sunrise and sunset, with ferret and bag nets. The per- mission is limited to the farmers and members of their families resident on their farms. Yours truly, E. 11. LirscojiB, Of course this permission is quite useless on many estates as the vermin are in cover by day, and over the land by night. By this wonderfully gracious concession — the Baroness seems to class the tenant-farmer with respectable rat-catchers, as if their time is not more valuable than wasting it under the hedges with ferrets and nets. Some time since, after killing many hundreds on my farm, her ladyship kindly sent me twelve as a present ; but not seeing it in that light, I directed the keeper to take them back, and say I did not like insult added to injury, and I wished licr ladyship a good market with them. MR. HOPE'S SEWAGE FARM. In the Court of Exchequer, before the Lord Chief Baron and Barons Cleasby and Aphlett, the cases of Hope and the Romford Board of Health came on. Actions were brought by Mr. Hope against the Board for non-fulfil- ment of contract in not supplying a sufficient quantity of sewage to Breton's Farm, which lie had rented from the delend- tnts, and by the Board against Mr. Hope for the recovery of the rent of the said farm. Mr. Murphy, Q.C., and Mr. Cliarles appeared for Mr. Hope ; and Mr. Prentice, Q.C., and Mr. Charles Hall were for the Romford Board of Health. Mr. Prentice stated that there was an action brought by the Board to recover the rent, as it was called, for the sewage upon the plea ol eviction. He contended from several dates he could produce, that the negligence imputed to the Board in the cross-action occurred after the rent was due. So far as he could see, the first action was undefended ; and the real question between the parties arose in the cross- action. The first count in the declaration was substantially that after the making of their demise the defendants did not supply, afford, or deliver into the possession of the plaintiff all the sewage of the town of Romford. The second count was upon an implied covenant that the Board would get the necessary work performed to connect certain houses in the district with the sewer. On the 16th May, 1870, the defendants covenanted with the plaintiff that they would do all works necessary to cause, and would cause, all the sewage of the town of Rom- ford which was capable of flowing by gravitation into a cer- tain outfall sewer. The plaintiff alleges a breach of this contract. The question was wluther, froiii the deed, any such covenant was to be implied. At the time the lease was granted there was an onfall sewer constructed to a place called Bre- ton's Farm and a reservoir, and a great number of houses in Romford drained into the tewer. The Local Board demised and leased to Mr. Hope " all the sewage of the town of Rom- ford, or such part thereof as shall flow by gravitation into the outfall sewer which nowconductsthesewageiutothetanksor re- servoir constructed" on Breton Farm. There were a great many other covenants in tlie lease on the part of Mr. Hope as to how he shonM farm the land and so on ; and there was a clause to the effect that if any of the covenants were broken the lease was to be at an end. The only covenant on the part of the Board which the Arbitrator liad found in some instances to be broken was one relating to the pumping from the low levels of the town. He had found that either from tiie boilers being out of order or from a change in the en- gineer, that ou some occasions when the water was being pumped Irom the reservoir to tiie farm some of the sewage The Lord Chief Baron : We have no'damages to assess. Mr. Prentice: You have to decide upon what principle the damages are to be assessed. At the sitting at Nisi Prius it was decided that if the Court should be of opinion tiiat Mr. Hope had any claim, then the Court was to determine the principle upon which the damages were to bo assessed. If tkere was negligence on the part of some of the servants of the Board causing some portion of the sewage to go iuto the brook instead of ou to the farm, then the Board would be liable for that, but that was scarcely worth discussion. Tiie main question waswhether there was really, as wss alleged, on the part ef the Board, a covenant which would imply that they were to came the inhabitants to drain into the outfall sewer. He might mention tiial the plaintiff was aware before the lease was executed that many of the houses in Romford did not drain into the sewer. The Lord Chief Baron asked what the works were Mr. Hope contended the Board ought to have done, and which they had not done. Mr. Murpliy said that there was a demise on the part of the Board to Mr. Hope that it was possible for them, by connect- ing the existing houses with the existing sewers, as they were bound to do by Act of Parliament, to allow the whole of the sewage to pass by gravitation into tlie outfall sewer, which liad not been done. The Lord Chief Baron asked what was the provision of the Act of Parliament that conferred the power upon the Board, and which imposed upon them such obligation. Mr. Murphy then minutely entered into the circumstances of the case, and dealt with the clauses of the lease. He con- tended that there was a demise of the whole drainage to Mr. Hope, and that the insertion of the words in the covenant, " or such part thereof as shall flow by gravitation" was only made by the Board for the purpose of protecting themselves against the necessity of putting such machinery in operation as would be requisite to pump the water from the low-lying portion of the town to such a level as would enable it to flow iuto the outfall sewer. By the Public Health Act the Board was bound to cause such sewers as may be necessary for the effectual draining of their district, and if the owners of houses refuse or neglect to connect their houses with these sewers, then the Board has power to do so and to charge the owners with the expense, aud the Sanitary Act of 1S6G provides that if the Board omit to put in force the powers vested in them complaint may be made to the Secretary of State, who, upon finding that the authority of the Board has not been carried out, may appoint some one to do so. The Utilisation of Sew- age Act, 1867, provided (or the disposal of sewage by Local Boards. Before the passing of this Act the sewage was dis- charged into the river at Romford, and in 1868 an injunction in Chancery was made restraining the Board from so disposing of it. In consequence of this injunction the Board issued an advertisement dealing with the whole of the sewage of the district and then the lease was executed. Looking at the position of the various parties in this matter, what was the fair construction to be put upon the lease ? He could show from the lease that Mr. Hope would have been bound to take and dispose of the whole of tlie sewage in question. The con- struction put upon the lease by his learned friend (Mr. Pren- tice) came to this, tha* the Board would give Mr. Hope as much or as little sewage as they pleased and that he would nevertheless be bound to give them £600 — the «hoIe of the rent. He contended that the Board was bound to give Mr. Hope the whole of the sewage of the district. The Lord Chief Baron again asked what the Board were bound to do and what they liaJ failed to do. Mr. Murphy said that there were several houses which could have been connected with the outfall sewer, and that no such connexion had been made. At the time Mr. Hope took possession of the farm he knew that a number of houses in the district were not connected with sewers discharging by gravi- tation iuto the outfall sewer, but he trusted the Board would put their power in force and connect these houses viith the sewers, but made no further inquiry and acquired no further information as to what had been done, or omitted to be done, at execution of the lease. That being the position of parties, Mr. Hope thought that the Board was bound by the Sewage Utilisation Act to give him the whole of the sewage. Sup- THE PARMER'S MAGAZINE. 497 posing the Board, acting perfectly lionestly, had connected two-thirds of the houses that drained at tliat time into the outfall, Mr. Hope, according to their construction of the lease, would have been bound to pay the whole of the £600, and would have had no remedy given to him. Mr. Baron Cleasby said that it was a usual thing for drain- age works such as tliose in question to go wrong occasionally, and lor drains to cease to flow sometimes for a period of several days. Mr. Murphy said that assuming they did Mr. Hope would still be deprived of something which he had been promised, and it would still be a matter for compensation. The rent of £600 must have been fixed on some basis, such as, say, 2s. per head of the inhabitants, and it sniely could not be intended by the Board that Mr. Hope was to pay the same rent for a small number as for a large number of houses. He did not put it as an implied, but as an express covenant that the Board was to grant the whole of the sewage of the town of Romlord to Mr. Hope, and that had not been done. As to the action for rent, he would ask. Was this a demise of sewage, or a sale of sewage, or what was it ? It was analagous, he thought, to a grant or a right of porting over land where there had been a suspen- sion of the right granted ; and upon the finding of the arbi- trator there had been an abstraction in August, September, and October, 1873, of the thing they had bargained to give him. Mr. Prentice said he quite agreed that by reason of negli- gence in one or two instances the sewage did not go on to the farm. Tile Lord Ciiief Baron : You do not deny there should be a verdict. Mr. Prentice : I do not. After some further argument. The Lord Chief Baron proceeded to give judgment. In doing so he said there was no principle involved in tiie matter of damages assessed. The only question was, what Was the value of the sewage Mr. Hope had not received ? If the Board had the means of connecting some 20 or 30 or 40 houses to an outfall sewer and had neglected to do so, they were guilty of a dereliction of duty. It was perfectly clear to him that there was no pretence for arguing or suggesting that by the covenant the Board was bound to put in force the powers in- vested in them by Act of Parliament to compel all tne inhabi- tants to cause their sewage to run into the outfall sewer. The Court must give judgment for the plaintiffs — the Local Board —in the one action to recover the reut or sums of; money ia question ; and judgment for the plaintiff (Mr. Hope) in the other action to recover such damages as the arbitrator may award in respect of a partial failure in the quantity of sewage supplied. The other learned Judges added a few remarks substantially concurring in the judgment given by the Lord Chief Baron. This is virtually a verdict in favour of the Board. STAINDROP FARMERS' CLUB. THE BREEDING OF SUOllTUORNS. At the last meeting a paper on Cattle Breeding was read oy Mr. George Hedley, of Newcastle-upon-Tyne; Mr. W. T. Scarth, president of the Club, in the chair. Mr. G. Hedley said : It is difficult at this advanced era in the history of agriculture to hit upon a subject to bring before a farmers' club tliat may be considered at once interesting and instructive. I therefore avail myself of a suggestion made by your secretary some time ago, that this paper siiould be some- thing about cattle breeding or cattle feeding, partly, I presume, because this is the district where the common country cow first graduated into the beautiful and ornate Shorthoru, and partly because the traditional fires of the improver of that most useful race of domestic animals still burn with consider- able ardour in the hearts of the farmers around. It is now upwards of ten years since I addressed anything to the public about cattle, and that was then done in an essay, entitled, " The Origin and Progress of Cattle," and after that some letter on judging by points, first sent to The Nor/h British AgricuUurisf. They were then bound together in pamplet form, and had a very lair sale both in Great Britain and in some parts of Ireland. They were largely quoted from in America, and, I believe, had the effect of laying down a basis for a sys- tem of judging Shorthorns by points in some parts of that country. The latter portion of the pamphlet — namely, that about judging by points — has never been much accredited in England, and in a great measure, 1 should say, because it was not when published fully elaborated and discussed. I should, tlierefore, be pleased if you would look upon this paper as a continuation of the whole subject, which I shall endeavour to treat with all the brevity and completeness possible, although I trust you will bear in mind that, as it embraces a wide field for thought, it cannot really be done justice to, in a very few words, when we look around and take into account the fabulous sums of money obtained for Shorthorned cattle at some sales of late, it is apt to occur to us that tliey resemble more the disposal of galleries of highly-renowned pictures or celebrated pieces of sculpture at the Academies of Art, than that of ruminating animals, whose breath is only in their nostrils. And to carry the simile further, while a Titiens or a Turner, a Phidias or a Thorvaldsen, may bring thousands of pounds, a David or a Cooper, a Spencer or a Lough, may go for an old song. So is it with cattle, while the Lates' and the Booth's are carried off at any money, the Towneley's and the Torr's, lacking, perhaps, the pure strains of the former all through ten generations or more, may be picked up at the common price, simply because they are not the fashion. Their fame is not consolidated through a long series of years. It is not cosmopolitau, and it is not ascertained that a bad resultant might not crop out, though the ancestor possessing the inherited feature or features con- demned might be sixty years dead. Is this not carrying the art of cattle breeding much too far into the regions of romance? You mi.y preserve your Titiens or your Turners on your walls untarnished and untouched, but you cannot preserve your Bates or your Booth, or rather your Bates or your Booth forms without the genius of a Bates or a Booth. The former are inimitable facts, accomplished and preservable, the latter are living facts, which must be carried forward and perpetuated, otiierwise they will soou cease to exist iu their commendable and much-admired outlines. A very ardent studeut may give 5,000 guineas for a Bates bull aod cow, but it does not follow that they are intrin- sically worth the quarter of that money, or that they may even throw him a calf that could be fairly said to be of the value of £50 — that is, if symmetry, substance, and beauty are to be the guide. The bull and cow might have very little natural affinity for each other, and hence the blood would not mingle or har- monise. It is worthless, I contend, to have a herd of Bates or Booth animals without some of the wisdom of a Bates or a Booth to guide them. No doubt exists that some few herds of those two distinct strains have continued to keep up the good characteristics of their respective names. But how many out of the whole number have failed? A very large propor- tion I must say. The reason is not far to seek. The few have had at their heads men with an intuitive knowledge of how to marry tf.e sires and dams without a loss of the vital forces and the harmony of the outward features. The many have gone on haphazardly without knowing the particular types of recognised beauty, and the likes and dislikes of certain strains of blood for other strains. The success of those two splendid herds referred to may be attributed to three causes — firstly, the wonderful powers for recognising strength and beauty in animal structures possessed by the owners ; secondly, the long time those powers were exercised on two herds and iu one direction ; and, thirdly, a consanguineous cross which, as far as we can gather, was practised upon both. To stamp a type nothing is so potential as a consanguineous cross. It cannot be neutralised or eliminated in a short space of time, and Messrs. Bates and Booth were the kind of men who knew when to do it — namely, at the period when their herds had attained that perfection of form and vigour of coustitution so long desired. You can only go a very short way in that direc tion however, and no doubt it would be done by them lor one desideratum aloue^uamely, to create a onencos in the general 98 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. features of tlieir animals. If all tlie branches of those two noble families of cattle had sprung from two or three roots, the distinctive peculiarities of strength and beauty could not have been long sustained ; for although they now come under the designation of two great names, they are derived from various sources all drawn in and wisely engrafted by the powers that tiien presided. Nothing is so fatal to a herd as a succession of close crossing. Nothing is so difficult to manage as wide crossing ; hence my reason for claiming for successful Short- liorn breeders the genius of an art. The man who has not au eye to form, a knowledge of the laws that govern physiology, r.ni some power of ajipreciating the elective affinities, had better let Shorthorn breeding alone. I know a family who have used Booth bulls for upwards of twenty years, and have never made a single mark of any importance, simply because they did not happen to have an eye for beauty of form. I have the acquaintance of a gentleman who is famous for his correct estimation of animal symmetry, and also of weight and colour, but who missed his way from being at the very liead of the Shorthorn kingdom by not having the courage to give his herd a consanguineous cross. In this, I think, was shown a lack of physiological knowledge and acumen. Mr. Bates may be taken to have been a man who had an instinctive as well as an acquired conception of all those things, at least if we may believe what we have heard and read about him since his de- mise. He never, I understand, introduced his males and females hastily to each other, but while they ruminated in their folds or pastures, he ruminated from various standpoints about their features and idiosyncrasy, and their adaptability for each other. I do not know whether he took colour into account as one of the most ])otent integrals of the affinities, but there is no doubt but what he had an excellent taste for form, and also knew physiologically that all kinds of animals are desirous of finding their complement instead of their coun- terpart. He held that all things are devisecl To be by chemists sjTithetised : That from eacli pair there thus may be a Progenitor of some third idea ; That love from opposites is bred, As white is born from green or red ; And that, like wliite, 't\vould ne'er be seen If green were bred with blue or green ; That 'tis from discords that we call Our fullest harmonies of all. Truly speaking, the rule of thumb practice of adjusting defec- tive parts by introducing animals respectively unlike in those pirts, has its roots in the affinities and the laws of natural selection. Probably much the same thing would happen if the beasts were running wild in the fields, and there was no human eye to control them. Because strong males have an affinity for weak females, and rice versa, but the strong males would kill the weak males off, and thus through all time preserve the vigour of the race. This is much wliut Mr. Bates has done only for a short space of time for Shorthorns. He studied Nature, and, as it were, usurped one of her des- tinies. We may presume that he understood a good deal about the laws of natural selection. If he did not, and was guided alone by a fine artistic eye, he arrived at the same result, but only in a different way. He produced strength and s;. mmetry because, to speak phrenologically, he had the organs of individuality, form, and colour well set in his head, lie also had love of animals in his heart, and many of the faculties wh'ch actuated a Potter or a Landseer to place those subjects on canvas. What Sir Edwiu did by his brush Mr. Bates did through the living agencies of the animals them- selves. Given a beautiful horse or a cow, Sir Edwin could place it on canvas in form and colour as he saw it, or im- proved if he liked. Given a selection of males and females, Mr. Bates could put them together so as to produce similar or improved forms in the progeny. This is the faculty re- quired in a first-class breeder of Shorthorns, and therefore I ctnnot too ttrongly impress upon you the danger of prac- tising such a difficult art, without being possessed of some of the special qualitications for it. Love of a particular breed of cattle by no means determines that you are fitted for the pos- session of it, and qualified to improve it if desired. Love springs from the heart, and may be affected by ungraceful forms as well as graceful ones. It requires something in ad- dition. It requires the organs of form, individuality, colour, and comparison well developed in the cranium to enable a man to judge of Shorthorn cattle and carry the breed to a successful termination. For example, there are many men who are able to tell which of two animals near a size is the heavier when standing closely together, but v^fould be quite at a loss if they were separated a few hundreds of yards. Tiiese men would be found lacking tb.e organs of individuaUty and comparison, and would also be apt to forget the faces and forms of men. I saw three recognised breeders of Short- horns judging cattle quite lately down in the north, aud they selected a bull with a neck scarcely if any improved from that of the bison, and every part of his body was an undulating surface of hills and holes. He had not even one foot of a straight line in his backbone. He was the heaviest animal and the ugliest, and therefore these men might be said to have an eye for weight and none for beauty. They could tell which was the biggest beast in the class, and that was about all. Another instance of the same kind came under my notice at one of our own Christmas shows — it was this : Two heifers of nearly equal age, same colour, and nearly the same weight, came out for adjudication. The one was rather bigger in size than the other, was made up of a number of straight lines and partially crooked ones, aud upon the whole pre- senting a good many protruding points to the eye. The other had one straight line along the back, and the rest of the body was all over it and around it composed of the innumerable segments of a variety of circles, beautifully adjusted and bar. moniously blended together. In short, a perfect specimen. They gave the prize to the former ! This is another instance where the eye for weight was more correct than for beauty, and the judges would probably never have made good sculptors or painters, or landscape gardeners, if even they studied a very long time. AYith colour it is the same. Some men iiave eyes for colour, and none for form, and are always attracted by bright hues and smooth {.-lossy surfaces. They also are not adapted for acting as breeders aud judges of cattle, for while we do not ignore the value of good colours in the Short- horn polity, we would not depreciate an animal in the scale of merit if its form was the best and it did not depart in any out- rageous manner from wliite or red, or any mixture of those two. But colour in tlie showyard and in the breeding shed, are two different things to be studied. While form is the object to be attained in the arena of competitio:-', I should placs a very great reliance upon colour(an(l that not of the hair alone), as a guide to the proper admixture of blood in the home curtain. Colour, as we know, in all animals takes its hue from the secretions. It permeates the liver and the heart, and men have been known to go half distracted about a woman with a single shade of greater darkness in the eyebrows or eyelashes than her fairer sister had. It is so, in a modified sense, with the lower animals, and instances could be cited where males had taken a perfect dislike to females of a cer- tain colour, because it was not in cousonace with their in- stincts of sweetness and fitness. The moral of all this is that the breeding of Shorthorn cattle is a very insecure business, and that there are very few men iu the universe capable of carrying it out to successful commercial issue — and hence the reason why a couple of herds have gained all the praise. They were superintended by men of extraordinary ability for a large number of years, and were thorouglily established — or, to use the artistical phrase, were well set in their frames. I venture to say that the possession of a head of fine fashionable Short- iiorn is not a matter for much congratulation at the pre- Nfut time, if taken as a test of ability and sober judgment. As a proof of wealth it most assuredly is, but the credit and the fame all redound to Messrs. Bates and Booth, none of the gentlemen who ever followed in their footsteps having pro- duced better animals than they did themselves. To originate a good herd from an obscure branch would be a matter of greater significance than the expenditure of 1,785 guineas for a fifteen months heifer by Sir Curtis Larapton, of 1,700 for a broken-down dam by Mr. Mcintosh, of 1,220 for a small Lncy by Mr. Larking, of 555 for a ten months calf by Sir William Armstrong, or of ■120 for an old cow by Sir John Swinburne or Sir Wilfrid Lawson. These cattle will d'e out, and the gentlemen wl;o possess them will probably not be found to have produced anything in size and contour equal to the sires aud dams they began with. And hence au extraordinary loss of time and money, for, as Mr. VV. H. Sothara says in The Mark Laiic Express, " Tlie points of an animal must sustain the pedigree, otherwise pedigree is no use," and therefore the man who produces perfection of form from ordinary priced bca-sts is much greater aud more to be commended than the THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE, 499 one wlio goes to the fancy sales and throws his money as it were into the ocean, to be swallowed up and wasted. It is not difficult, in ray opinion, to produce the finest of Shorthorns witliout a fabulous expcoditurc of wealth. The economies of animal ordinance are with you. Tliey are always striving with themselves to adopt the purely cylindrical shape, and that is the shape which all the best Shorthorns wear. The tendency of all the animal organisers, if placed in any kind of fiir circuiTistancrs, is to advance instead of to decline upon the sc;ile of beauty and vi^-our. Hence as you have Nature on your side the only difficulty you have to deal with is how to get fairly formed dams and sires to begin with. These you will soon find if you have an eye for beauty and proportion. The crossing of the sexes will belong to your ideas of blooil, colour, and constitution, and if these are correct a herd will soon be produced equal to any of those of the Uuke of Devon- shire, Lord I3ective, Mr. Cheney, or others we may liave to mention. Indeed, I have no doubt but there are more within a very short distance at the present moment wiio willi leisure on hand and suitable pasturage could produce in seven crosses from West Highland Kyloes, or polled Galloway dams, as good a herd as could be found in Great Britain. I will go further than that, and say that with two Shorthorn bulls at £100 each, and "20 Shorthorn cots at £Vj each — their own cluus- ing — tl'.ey would be able to distance in thre.^ crosses two-lhifds of the men who are plunging into such marvellously high- priced beasts, always recollecti;!g that form, weight, and quality would have to be the deciding points. The Argyle- shire Kyloe and the Gallowayshire polled Scot are as nearly perfect in formation as possible ; tlierefore, if you began with them as dams you have only the colour, touch, and horn to correct, but I decidedly prefer the good country cow. To show how soon co'cur is dissipated by males of the Bos genus, I may mention a fact which is not perhaps geuerolly known in rc'crence to the wonderful power the black-polled Galloway male exercises over Ayrshire females in the very first ir>stance. If he is a pure-bred animal he at once slamps his colour, his general lineaments, and his size upon the produce, and if lie were put along with as many as one hundred Ayrshire cows, which, you will remember, would be nearly all red-aud-whitc, possessing long horns, tliere would not be a single calf otherwise than jet black and without horns in the whole of the resultants. Each and every calf would undoubtedly be so much like the pure Galloway that a great many very good judges would not be able to detect the alloy. In crossing the Shortb.orn male with Highland or Gallowayshire dams, the ciiatije is not so rapid, the cardinal colour, black, being more potent and endurable than the transitory reds and mixed shades of Shorthorn. It therefore does not go out at once, and the horn in the produce is a little elongated, as we see it in many of the Bates' tribes now — simply because an essentially long-horned breed and a short-horned breed were introduced together. This, I think, is detrimental to the pure Bates in an historical point of view, as the appellation, " S ort- horn" docs not literally apply. Ilowever, as he is justly cre- dited with having produced the originals of the highest. priced animals in the world, perhaps we ought to look back at this jointure, and see where he procured his first stocks, and also note a few of the wonderful gradations they have gone through up to the present time. Mr. Bates was contemporary with Charles Colling in 1800, but he was not in the ascendant as a breeder of Shorthorns, and his most memorable purchase was that of Young Duchess, for 183 gs., at Mr. Colling's sale in that year. It is said slie was a descendant of the Kjloc, but the pedigree we have of her at that time is this— that she was a daughter of Comet, sold at the same time to four gen- tlemen for 1,000 gs., that her dam was from the not funous and almost universal bull Favourite, and that she was in calf to a son of Comet. Here then was the beginning of closs in- and-in, or consanguineous breeding at once. Since that time the breed has run through many generations with varied suc- cess, until last year at New York Mills, the fame of the " Duchesses" culminated m 40,600 and 35,000 dollars re- spectively being given for 8th andlOth Duchesses of Geneva. They were bought to come to England, and at the same sale nine other Duchess cows were sold at such high prices that the whole eleven came to £19,750, or an average of £l-,522 lis. each. The great sales we have had since then in thi scountry are Lord Dunraore's, held last year, the Duke of Devonshire's, Lord Bective's, Mr. Cheney's, :and Mr. Leny's this year, but none of the prices here have been anything like those obtained at New York Mills. The highest price given was 2,000 gs. for a small heifer to Mr. Leny, while an Oxford bull of high fame was bought by Mr. Peter for the Duke of Roxburgh for 250. The average of the Duke of Devonshire's cows was 462 gs., that of Lord Btctivc's 382, and that of Mr. Cheney's 561 ; the commoner in this instance beating both the lords. The buyers of the highest-priced beasts have, no doubt, adopted the royal road to a herd of fine Shorthorn?, but I shall be much surprised if they do not ultimately find out that there is no royal way of keeping it. Gentlemen like Sir Joiin Swin- burne may ultimately ascertain that a bull of the first water is almost as difficult to find, and to set in golden framework, as even a Cape diamond, and Sir Wilfrid Lavvsou that the aris- tocracy of the living race will require something better than the poor grass and cold springs ofBrayton Park to keep them up. The present mania for high-bred cattle can therefore only be called a species of gambling of the most dangerous class. Tiiat for the turf does not seem to bear any comparison with it, fur although you may lose sight of a couple of thousand guineas in buying a Stockwell or Newminster colti yet it is quite pos- sible that he may win the whole of it back for you in his firot race. " True," it may be observed by some captious critic, " but you are quoting two strains of blood of the very first kind ; what becomes of the second and third kind?" The second and third have also a much better chance of re- couping the speculator than cattle, simply because they are handicapped according to their known capabilities, and often win races from very superior animals. Wiiile they are very much easier reproduced or propagated than Shorihorns, speed being the only desideratum, it matters little whether you have an eye for magnificence of outline and physique or not, you can always send your dams to reputable sires. With Shorthorns you have to wait nine months for a cilf, and if that proves an abortion, as it often does in the hands of a novice, where are all the hundreds of pounds you have sunk in the originals ? I trust 1 have made out pretty clearly that the faculties of the mind required to cunduct a famous herd of Sborlhorns through several generations with commercial success are of a much higher order tliau what they have generally gained credit for ; that it takes a fine man to manage a fine lierd well — a man steady and industrious in his habits, with the organs of peicep- tion and reflection well developed in his head — in reality an artist and a physiologist, fond of his art and his calling, and ardent in his desires to carry them out to a successful and a happy issue. The Cu-viiniAN agreed that a man should have a speciality for Siio.'thorn breeding to succeed, and instanced Mr. Outh- waite, of that neighbourhood, as a proof that others need not be disheartened in making the attempt. Mr. Iiedley had mentioned the advantage of study, and he (the speaker) thought the great point was to be c.ireful as to their choice of a male, which had far more influence on the future than the female, and this applied to both cattle and horses. Mr. Nesh.\3I said there were three things required for Shorthorn breeding, and these were absolutely necessary — viz., a long purse, a very good eye for judgment, and very good land on which to bring up the animals. He showed the fallacy of the principle of breeding from an animal which was at all faulty in its own breed. As to Mr.Bates and Mr. Booth , if ever they met with an animal tiiey did not like they put it out of the way, and as a consequence had a long range of steers in their breed. This might ba an expensive way of doing things, but it must be done if perfection was to be arri\-ed at. He had always had a great regard for Shorthorns, and had known them nearly all his life ; his opinion was that there were better Shorthorns in by-gone days than were to be seen now. The jreat animals that were sold at the Duke of Devonshire's sale the other day were weedy, and would not compare with the animals which were seen forty years ago. Whether the system of in-and-in breeding had anytiiing to do with it, was a question which he would not enter upon, and as to the prices, perhaps they, in a great measure, were due to cer- tain noblemen who would have (hose animals, no matter at what cost. Dr. Br.uNSKii.L expressed liis ^admiration he had of flue, large, well-coloured animals. Mr. Byeks rather felt inclined to doabt if the £100 bulls and cows referred to in the paper would be successful in Shorthorn breeding. He sliowed tliat Mr. Bates tried to rival Mr. Collins, by breeding with Wildeyes, but he did not succeed, and he expressed his opinion that ordinary mortals could 500 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. hardly be successful with the animals mentioned by Mr, Hedley. Mr. Bell said in that neighbourhood the farmers gene- rally aimed at breeding animsls that would pay as they went on. They had some pretty fair beasts, but not the sort referred to by Mr. Hedley. No particular breed was established in the locality, for the general aim seemed to be the production of good large steers and heifers. As to improving the breeds, all that Ihey could do was to look at the females, and, having seen the deficiencies, try to find a male which was superior in those particular points. However, it was a noticeable fact that an animal of better breed always took well in the sale market, and they always paid better, for they fattened at a less expense. He testified to the improvements brought about by the introduction of Shorthorn cattle. Mr. Hawdon thought that a persistent breeding in one class might lead to the effect of making the offspring more delicate. Mr. Grah.vm (the secretary) testified to the difficulty of mating Shorthorn cattle, and in answer to the state.iient in the paper with regard to the high prices obtained at New York Mills, said he believed the large amounts were given by a man that did not know the value of the money mentioned. He understood that he did not know the value of a dollar. He believed that a great deal was owing to those monied men who, in having a fancy for cattle breeding, brought Shorthorns to such perfection. These gentlemen, in some instances, allowed their tenants to have these valuable animals at prices not at all extravagant, by which means they went all over the country, and great benefit resulted therefrom. There was one in the neighbourhood who did something ol the kind, and they were all very much obliged to him. Mr. Hedley, in reply, thought the subject of tlie evening should be well ventilated along the banks of the Tees, which he designated the home of the Shorthorn. He repeated that it was possible to get good ones, especially if a judicious visit were paid to a locality where Shorthorns were not studied or thought much of. It was quite possible to find first-class bulla and cows at about £100 and £40 respectively. He dared say the Bates breed had degenerated, for the simple reason that it required a Bates to look after it. He showed the necessity of education to be successful in breeding. The usual votes of thanks were passed, and the meeting broke up. LAYING DOWN LAND TO PASTUEE. At the monthly meeting of the Shropshire Chamber of Agriculture, held at Shrewsbury, Mr. George Cureton in the chair, the following questions were sent to the Shropshire Chamber of Agriculture by the Royal Agricultural Society of England, requesting replies thereto, which Mr. Henry Brown, of Preston, near, Wellington, kindly furnished. 1. What is the acreage of your farm ? — 99 acres. 2. Is it your own property, or do you rent it ? If the latter, do you hold on lease, or from jear to year ? And have you Tenant-flight ? — 12 acres only my own ; the remaining part rented from year to year to TVnant.Right. 3. What is the nature of the soil and subsoil? — Sand, gravel, peat, clay. 4. What is the average rainf?ll in your district ?— Very light, I should think not more than 25 inches. 5. In what year did you begin to lay down land to per- manent grass P — 1854. 6. What were, at that time, the proportions of your farm in arable land ? — 66 acres. Permanent pasture 33 acres. 7. What breadth of arable land (if any) have yon, since the above date, laid down as permanent grass F — The w hole of my farm I have now under grass. 8. In changing jour system of management, were you in- fluenced by the high price of fat and lean stock, by the increased and increasing cost of agricultural labour, or by other, and what circumstances ? — Purely by the increased cost and difficulty of agricultural labour upon a small farm. 9. Besides distance from the homestead, and water supply, what other conditions (as quality of soil, value, aspect, &.c.) guided you in selecting your fields for permanent grass ? — In the outset difficulty in working thin-skinned land with un- certainty of crops. 10. Having made choice of your ground, with what kind of cultivation and crops, say in the two preceding )ears, did you prepare the soil for the reception of tiie permanent seeds P (If you have tried different methods, kindly state which you have found to answer best, as this is very important). — Turnips followed with barley or oats. Both sown tliin, say from 5 to 6 pecks per acre. 11. Does jour experience teach you that laud should or should not be made as dry ([ mean by underground drainage) for grazing as ftr arable purposes? — Decidedly not so dry, particularly open subsoils. 12. Ifour land being ready for seeding, in what month have 3 on generally sown the permanent grasses and clovers ? did you sow the light and heavy seeds separately? and what niixtiirfs have jou used with most success? — In April the Ight and heavy seeds generally sown together. The mixture of grass seeds I have not found of so much consequence as a high condition of land. I have always tried to get my laad in a high state of cultivatiou before laying it down to grass ; and not only so, but have found it even profitable to dose it well every year for the first four or five years, which com- pels nature as it were to produce grasses tiiat are indigenous to the soil. In this consists the secret of the whole business. 13. Do you recommend that the permanent seeds be sown with or without a grain crop which shall be allowed to ripen ? with or without a sprinkling of rye, or rape, or some similar crop, to be eaten green ? — With a grain crop allowed to ripen, sown thin, thereby lessening the probability of it lodging. 14. In laying down land to grass, have you practised the system generally known as ' inoculation ?' If so, please describe the process adopted, and state the cost? — No. 15. Wliat have you lound to be the best mode of treating (iucluding manuring) the young seeds, say during the first two or three seasons ? Would you mow in any year ? or would you depasture with cattle or sheep. — Always oue or two dressings of well made farm-yard manure. I should prefer depasturing with cattle, but in a great measure should be guided by seasons. If a moist season I should prefer depasturing with sheep, or even to mow ; but if the latter, a mobt liberal dressing with manure will be required. I tiiinkit of the utmost importance to svoid as much as posbible treading and poaching of the surface tor the first t^o or three years. 16. Have you found that this altered mode of farming paj* you belter than your former practice ? and can you give in figures a tabulated comparison of the two systems, inducing the saving in manual labour and horse-keep? — Having only just finished putting the whole of my farm under grass I can- not answer the question as to pay, but so far as 1 can at present judge the result will be satisfactory. 17. What alteration (if auj) in the number of breeding store, and feeding animals kept on the farm lias been the result of laying down this land to permanent grass? — Two thirds more cattle ; principally feeding. 18. Do you find that the number of stock kept on the farm is being increased or diminished as the recently laid down grass acquires greater maturity? — Much increased. For reasons given in the latter part ofjanswers to question twelve. 19. What aid (if any) have you received from jour land- lord (if J ou have one) in laying dow n jour permanent pasture ? and what conditions (il any) accompanied that aid? — None 20. Judging from the results of jour own e.\perience, what description and quality of laud do you consider pays best to lay down to grass in your district ? and wiiat soils would you prefer to keep under arable cultivation ? — Clays. The more open soils for arable culture. The Improvoinent of Permanent Grass. — 1. What means have you adopted to impiove the already permanent grass existing on your farm, but not laid down by you, viz., by the application of manures, or the consumption of roots or arti- ficial food on the land ? — I have given heavy dressings with prepared bone manures and farmyard manure, and also a THE J'ARMER'S MAGAZINE. 501 liberal consumption of linseed corn and decorticated cotton cake. 3. Wliat effect lias the application of farmyard manure (if an)) to your grass land on tlie system as manuring your arable land ? — Greater outlay in artificial manures. 3. Do you mow any portion of your grass land in any year ; aud, if so, how often, or do you entirely depasture, and, if so, with cattle or sheep ? — A small extent of peat grass land mow each year, the remainder entirely depastured with cattle. 4. Have you found that to improve your grass land makes it pay you better tlian Jbefore ? and can you give iu figures a tabulated comparison of the two systems ? — My first application of prepared bones give an increase of 27 per cent in butter. I was then dairying. 5. What alteration, if any, in the number of stock kept on the farm lias been the result of this improvement of your grass land? — I kept 25 head of cattle wlien my farm was one-third uuder grass. I have already reached 73, and confidently expect to increase to 90. M 0 R A Y S H I E E F A R M E R S' CLUB. THE TURNIP CROP. At the quarterly meeting at Elgin, Lord Macdnfl", M.V., in the chair, it was agreed that there should be no shew of seeds and roots in February. The following subject was put down for discussion : " In tl e preparation of land for the turnip crop, whether it is more pro- fitable to apply farmyard manure iu the autumn or at the time of sowing ? Mr. YooL (Goulard Bank) said the question set down for dis- cussion is no doubt one of considerable importance ; but it is also one on which there is a considerable amount of conflicting evidence. Although I have carried out the practice of autumn manuring to some extent myself, I have never made any care- ful experiments to determine the relative advantages of apply- ing farmyard manure to land inteaded for a turnip crop in the autumn or at the time of sowing. Any remarks that I may make on the subject, therefore, are merely tiie impressions de- rived from experiments recorded by others and what I have observed in my own experience. In the first place, then, I think, if land for turnips is to be manured in autumn, it must be thoroughly clean, and besides, be land of good quility and in good condition. If such conditions exist, then, I think autumn dunging may be practised with safety aud profit, more especially if artificial manure is applied at tiie time of sowiu'/ (which is now almost universally the case), as it will serve to force on the young plants until tlieir rootlets push out into the soil with which the farmyard manure is incorporated. Dunging in autumn will lessen the expense of application, beside con- siderably forwarding spring work, while, under the conditions I have referred to, and especially for Swedish turnips, which are abundantly supplied with roots, the crop will, I think, be as good, if not better, than when dunged at the time of sowing. If land is foul, autumn manuring will only stimulate the growth of weeds, and iu such a case, I would prefer to leave off' the dunging until the land was got cleaned in spring. On poor, hungry land, and on land out of condition, I think it is best to apply the fara]3ard manure in the drills at the time of sowing, as in such a case it is desirable to have tlie greatest available amount of manure close to the roots of the growing plants. On the light sandy lands of which so much of this county is composed, I should doubt the advisability of autumn manuring for the turnip crop. Such soils are of an open, porous nature, and are deficient iu that mechanical texture which enables heavier soils, such as good loams and clays, to retain in a state of what Liebig calls " physical combination," the valuable manurial elements of the duug; consequently, on such thin, light soils, I think it is better to apply the manure in the drills at the time of sowing. It is an important question, and I think this Club might very judiciously devote a portion of its funds as a prize for a report on this subject. Experiments in agriculture are so very liable to be affected by differences in soil, climate, &c., tiiat what may be a perfectly safe guide in one district may not be so in another; and as, so far as I know, no carefully-conducted experiments have ever been carried out in this county to determine the point whether, " in the preparation of the land for turnip crop, it is more profitable to apply larmyard manure in the autumn, or at the time of sow- ing," I think this Club might wisely devote a portion of its funds for an approved report on such a set of experiments. Mr. Adam (Billhead) : I have no experience with regard to Uyiiig down manure in autumn for the turnip crop. But about four years ago I had a piece of ground which was pretty much braeset, and I thought it could hardly be dealt with in the usual way, and so I laid down the manure in autumn. I found that, although the turnips in that case were not so regular to a size as when sown in the drill, the crop was quite as heavy. I think if it were done upon land such as I operated upon in the autumn, it would be quite as successful as if done in the drill. Mr. Cooper (Spynie) : I have no experience. I intend to try an experiment on a piece of clean land this season. The great merit of turnip culture on light land is deep stirring; and, although it is apart from the subject, I would recommend that it be done by the steam plough. I have grown a good crop this year on light land by deep stirring. In general I think laying down manure in autumn does not suit in Moray- shire, because there is such a tendency to run to weed by dung- ing the stubble. I think the difficulty would be in having the stubble land cleaned in time. Mr. Walker (Altyre) : The question is one upon which five out of every six of the members of this Club could not jrive an opinion. We have never had an opportunity of testing the merits of autumn manuring as compared with summer manuring. A large portion of our farmyard manure is applied to the barley break, and to wheat in the autumn, so that in the autumn when you waut to apply it to the turnip break, you have not the manure ready to apply to the land. There is no doubt about this, that now-a-days when horses and labour are such important matters in our management, if we had the dung to apply iu autumn we would save a considerable deal of labour. We could save the trouble of twice lifting ; and we would save the life of many of our horses, which are worked to pieces by being taken to the top of the dung-hill. These are conclusions which one can arrive at without much practical experience, but whether it would benefit the crop or not I cannot say. Mr. Yool has said that it would be well to spend some of the Club's funds on experiments. But experi- ments are so doubtful that one year they teach one thing and another year they teach something different, and we can have no confidence in them. For many years I was under the im- pression that autumn manuring of potatoes brought a better crop, and even saved from disease. Last year I manured in the autumn, and I have had more disease that any of my neighbours by a long way. So far as the question on the card is concerned, I have no experience, and can give no opinion. Mr. RuxroN (luchbroom) : I have no experience, but my idea is that the sooner that the land is manured the better does the crop get on. I have a fear, however, that putting in a quantity of manure in autumn, much of its value will be spent during the winter. Mr. Hunter (Dipple) : I have had no experiense of manu- ring in autumn myself, but I may mention a fact which I noticed the other day. A competition for turnips was carried out by this Club in 1854, in which Mr. Lawson was successful; and I notice that in that year there was an experiment at Dipple, under which part of the turnip break was manured in autumn, and the other part in spring in drills. It turned out that the part of the field dunged in tlie autumn was lighter by oue ton per acre than that dunged in the spring. Mr. Todd (Ardivot) : I think, taking into account the nature of the climate and soil, there can be iittle doubt that thi best thing is to put the manure into the drill. I thiuk Mr. Walker has mentioned a very practical point in referring to the fact that in nine cases out of ten the farmers have no manure at all to plough into the land in the fall of the year. But, independently of that, it is better for bringing the turnip crop to put it in the drill. But if you take potatoes, the very 502 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. opposite is the case. I would approve ai putting tlic mauurc down for potatoes iu the fall of the year. Mr. ]Mu>'KO (Covesea) : I would just iu my very first re- marks say that we never should liave our laud in a state but what it would be always fit for taking in mr.nure. I never manure in the eud of the year. The remarks by Mr. Walker concur with my own experience, that where horses are saved and labour is saved, it is a very great matter indeod. I have found that after putting in dung with barley, I have had a good crop of turnips without farmyard manure, from very good bones and other stuffs I have bought from parties. I have found in my own experience that by applying farmyard manure when I was sowing my barley, that my barley crop was inferior to that on the portion of the land that was manured along with tlie turnips. I have no experience to give a decided opinion upon. However, I think if we could make more manure, and put it on twice, there would be no loss. Mr. Gregor (Western Alnes) : I have no experience of autumn manuring. I have always put the farmyard manure into drills. I was obliged to give 25 tons of farm manure, and may be 10 tons of manure besides. Mr. Lawson (Braelossie) : I have had no experience of manuring land for turnips in autumn ; but, I think unless the land be very clean (although Bailie Munro says it is possible for every man to have his land clean), it is impossible, in 3Iorayshire, to lay down manure profitably in autumn ; because, after the crop of wheat, you have lots of weeds to take out. I think, turning it over and over again in tlie autumn, would lead to a good deal of evaporation of the manure. My expe- rience is to put the dung down in the drill, M-ith a little artifi- cial manure above it. Mr. Reid (Mains of Orton) concurred in the remarks by Mr. Walker. Mr. Garden (Grangcgreen) had no experience. 'I he little he did in the way of manuring turnips he did in spring. ^ Mr. Adam (Sn'cethillock) : There is uo better way of put- ting it iu tlian along with the drills in spring, because there is a great proportion of it, after the turnip crop, to benefit the succeeding barley crop. Mr. Ross (Ilillhead) : We have not all our fields like gar- dens, as Bailie ilunro seems to say they should be. I think tlie land would be better to be turned up in autumn, to get much of the frost in winter, and have it ready in spring. It would best suit the soil and climate of Morayshire to do so, and apply the manure in spring. Instead of the experiments proposed by Mr. Yooi, I would give a prize for the best field of turnips, for which the manure was laid down either in autumn or spring. Mr. CULBAKD (Elgin) : I am only a crofter, not a farmer, but I have observed this, that in taking up my crop of turnips, and seeing the land tilled, I saw much of the manure untouched,' (A voice: You have given far too much.) Possibly, but I Jiave often seen gardeners in order to get a good crop", put t!ie land under a heavy manuring the year before they wanted to raise a good crop. So, I tliink if you had the manure, as some- times you have not, iu the autnmn, it would be fully better to put it into the soil a few months before the seed. Mr. YooL: Lord Macduff has allowed me a remark in reply. I expected that very little exact iuformution would be brought out. It was simply because I thought that no very exact con- clusions would be arrived at that I proposed that this Club should devote a small portion of its funds to the purpose of elucidating this question. We all know that witiiout experi- ment there can be no progress, and I think the Club in direct- ng such an experiment would be in the way of its duty. Provost Camerox : Supposing you give some of the money that you will save by not liolding your Spring Show. Viscount Macduff: The majority have given their opinion in favour of laying down manurss in spring, and not in autumn, as lieing best suited for the uuture of the soil and climate of this county. I propose that Mr. Yool's recommendation be sent to the Standing Committee of the Club for consideration. The motion was agreed to. A COSTLY BIRD.— At an adjourned Justice of Peace Court held in Stonehaven, William Kirkland, a young lad, was charged with day trespass in pursuit of game on the farm of Curraus, parish of Strachan. He pleaded guilty to taking a muirfowl out of a snare on a stook of corn, and was sen- tenced to pay the mitigated penalty of 2s. 6d., with £5 6s. lid. of expenses, or go to prison for twenty days. REVIEW OF THE CATTLE TRADE DURING THE PAST MONTH. On the whole the cattle trade has been quiet in tone during the month. Compared with the corresponding month last year, the tctal supplies of beasts exhibited have been larger, owing to the liberal receipt's from abroad. Prom our own grazing districts the arrivals have been less numerous than during that period; but from Scotland they have been better. Tliere has been, as usual, a marked disparity in the condition of the stock exhibited. For the best kinds the demand has not been active, and the top quotation has been Gs. 2d. per 81bs. Por medium qualities, especially during the cold weather, more inquiry has prevailed, and quotations for such descriptions have been relatively higher. Prom abroad supplies have been more extensive, the imports from Tonning being exceptionally heavy. The demand has been without feature at about the rates previously current. In tlie slicpp market nothing of interest has transpired. The supplies exliibited have been good, owing to the iieavy impor- tation—nearly irj.OOO fro;;,' abro:id. The condition of our home-fed stock has been iu the raaiu satisfactory, and the im- provement in the quality of foreign breeds continues to make progress. Business has not been brisk, but a fair amount of steadiness has prevailed, and 6s. 2d. per 81b. has been paid for the best Downs and half-brtds. The calf market has been alternately steady and depressed, but the closing prices of the month are not the highest. Sup- plies have been moderate. Pigs have been quiet and unaltered. The total imports of foreign stock into London last month have been as under : Beasts 14,155 Sheep 44,813 Calves 1,247 Pigs 1,324 CoMPAKisoN or Imports. Nov. 1873 1872 1871 1870 18G9 1868 1867 1866 1865 1864 1863 1862 1861 1060 1859 1858 Beasts. Sheep. Calves. Pigs. 9,473 31,733 1,924 2,563 4.326 35,112 2,289 204 12,846 56,299 1,857 2,812 14,903 43,830 2,177 2,463 9,964 32,091 1,713 2,208 9,391 18,162 598 353 10,761 33,203 618 2,069 13,278 38.389 1,290 1,187 16,254 53,517 2,526 7,770 17,137 34,792 2.970 3,947 11,030 30,447 1,770 2,202 6,839 28,577 1,659 033 5,295 27,833 946 1,241 6,961 22,723 1,604 828 5,927 21,907 997 15 4,786 18,258 1.174 15 Nov. 1873. Nov. 1873. The arrivals of beasts from our own grazing districts, as well as from Scotland and Ireland, thus compare with the three previous years : Nov. 1871. From Lincolnshire, Leicester- shire, and Northamptonshire 9,150 8,750 8,965 7,820 Other parts of England, includ- iug Norfolk and Suffolk 2,100 Scotland 79 Ireland 600 3,430 240 3,730 2,580 125 2,000 Nov 1874, 2,050 1,543 The annexed figures show the total supplies of stock exh bited and disposed ef at the Metropolitan Cattle Market during the month : — Beasts 24,700 Sheep 94,870 Calves 2,040 Pigs 250 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. 503 Comparison J^ov. Beasts. 1873 22,970 1872 18,620 1871 25,100 1870 15,570 1869 21,390 1868 19,249 1867 2i,080 1866 24,660 1865 36,820 1864 82,600 1863 27,701 1862 30,129 1861 26,590 1860 25,400 1859 26,492 1858 24,856 OF Supplies. Sheep. 85,300 77,590 108,930 96,920 77,990 98,390 109,960 95,800 167,230 114,300 99,130 110,020 109,370 103,600 120,840 114,643 Calves. 2,105 1,995 2,017 2,232 1,604 1,048 1.016 1,190 2,858 2,587 2,156 2,313 1,370 2,112 1,299 1,437 Pigs. 560 856 720 1,670 615 1.404 2,350 3,090 2,811 2,900 3,170 3.173 3,430 2,920 2,800 2,970 Beasts have sold a{ from 4s. to 6s. 2d., sheep at 4s. 4d. to 6s 4d., cal?es in. 8d. to 5s. lOd., and pigs 4s. to 5s. per 8 lbs. sinking the offal. Beef, from Mutton ... Venl Tork: Beef, from Mutton ... Veal Pork Comparison of Pricfs. Nov., 1870. Nov., 1871. s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. 3 4 to 6 0 3 10 to 5 10 3 4to6 2 4 4 to 6 8 3 6 to 5 10 3 8 to 5 8 4 4to 6 2 3 6 to 4 8 Nov., 1872. Nov., 1873. s. d. s. d. s. 3 10 to 5 10 4 4 2to7 0 4 5 0to6 0 4 3 8 to 5 0 4 d. s. 4 to 6 4 to 7 4 to 5 4 to g REVIEW OF THE CORN TRADE DURING THE PAST MONTH. The weather of November has exhibited strange fluctuations. It commenced with a vernal growth upon all vegetation, and a warmth approaching summer-heat; then came a few days of autumnal severity ; and just as we seemed likely to have a green Christmas we had a sharp taste of frost, broken shortly again by mildness, and then returning with increased seventy, and leading to the con- clusion that a hard season was coming on. There being no reliable forecast to help us through the difficulty, we must content ourselves with Nature's favours, whatever they may be. The meadows, however, can no longer be a resource for the cattle, so that feeding-stuffs, with a short crop, must keep up in price ; but the forward wheat, which was becoming winter-proud, will have a salutary check. The land, as a whole, yet keeps dry, though lately some fine rains have fallen, and this com- plaint comes more decidedly from every part of Europe, our insular position keeping us better supplied. The potato-pits will now be tested as to the souudness of quality ; but with a good yield of this tuber we can bear some loss. The wheat trade since harvest has been very much shaken as to values, aud the frost may have brought us past the lowest point; for 43s. 9d. per qr., the last general average, was quite low enough, and we take it, that the fact that the last crop has certainly been better than several of its predecessors has led to ex- aggerated views of its abundance, and set up a sort of senseless panic ; but the gradual falling oft' in the weekly sales shows that farmers have not yet quite lost their spirits, but look out for better days, as in times past; and when Christmas rents are paid, we may see a more decided turn. The only gain of the month has been Is. per qr., but a pinch of snuff will not pass for a substantial meal. So at least men on strike have found it, and it may strike farmers who can hold that it is better to do so than cut themselves to the quick. In this respect foreign growers and holders are quite of their mind. France is Is. to 2s. dearer. Productive Hungary shuts up her stores rather than make sacrifices. Egypt has become tired of sending to no profit. Morocco is forbidden by the Emperor to make shipments. If the devastation of the Civil War in .Spain increase, we may find that country an importer. Every port in the Baltic and Black Sea looks for better times ; and though we may now and then have a mad-cap advocate of the consumer, who likes to walk in stilts and pass for an oracle, generous enough to feed the people at the farmer's expense, we hold to the maxim, set every man be fairly remunerated for his toil. The following price* were recently quoted at the several places named : Best white wheat at Paris 473. 6d., red 463. ; at Bor- deaux, white, 47s. Gd. ; at Marseilles, Berdianski 43s. Sd., Ghirka 42s. lOd., white Spanish 43s. Cd. ; Courtrai, in Belgium, 46s., at Louvain 48s., at Liege 47s., at Amster- dam 45s., Maestrecht 45s„ fine red at Ilambro' 403., white Rostock 48s. 6d., best high-mixed at Dauzig 45s., fine red at Mnyence 45j., at Cologne 41s., at Berlin 40s., at Buda-Pcsth 43s. ; Saudomirka at Odessa 40s., Ghiika 33s. ; prime white at San Francisco 45s. Gd. per SOOlbs. c. f. i. ; red spring at New York, 8Gs.4d. per isOlbs. f. o. b. ; soft wheat at Algiers, 4Gs., hard 43s. per qr. f. o. h. The first Monday in oMark-lane opened on a moderate supply of home-grown wheat ; and the foreign arrivals were much reduced, though quite adequate to the demand. The show of fresh samples on the Essex and Kentish stands was limited, with the condition somewhat dete- riorated by the damp weather. Dry parcels were slowly taken at the previous rates, but all inferior were very dif- ficult to place. The foreign trade, notwithstanding the short supply, was very dull, new red American and Ghirka qualities being rather cheaper ex ship. The arrivals of floating cargoes were limited, and quotations barely maintained. The couutry trade this week was answer- able to that of the Metropolis, and rather worse: many places gave way Is., as Gainsborough, Leeds, Meltou Mowbray, Newbury, Slcaford, Spilsby, kc, while at St. Ives and Sheffield there was a decline of Is. to 2s. per qr., as well as at a few other places; but Liverpool was steady through the week. At Leith the wheat trade was 6d. dearer, and Ghirka sorts were Is. higher; but at Edin- burgh there was no change, while Dublin was dull for native qualities. Foreign obtained about Gd. per barrel more money. On the second Monday the English supply was rather diminished, but the foreign was more than doubled, con- sisting principally of Russian and American red, with a fair sprinkling, including white, from other pai (s. The exhibition of fresh native samples this mon ing was limited, but in rather improved condition. Sales, however, were but slow, at unaltered prices. White samples of foreign, being comparatively scarce, were fully as dear, and, in some instances, brought rather more money; but low red sorts were but a heavy sale, and sales ex ship rather lower. Though fthe arrivals of floating cargoes v.'ere limited, the demand was slack at ])revious quota- lions. The country trade this week, without positively reporting any decline, remained dull. Liverpool on Tuesday was Id. per cental dearer for white qualities, and Friday's market showed some improvement ia red. 504 THE FARMER'S MAGAZINE. As the week wore on, a sharp change in the weather to severe cold took place; and as a consequence, several of Saturday's markets were up Is. to 2s. But at Edinburgh there was a decline of Is. in wheat, and Glasgow remained with but a qi/'et trade. This week Dublin somewhat recovered, the market showing a more active inquiry for both native aii d foreign samples. Qa the third Monday the English supply was lessened, as well as the foreign arrivals, though the latter were still good, and half of them from New York, the rest being from Russia and the Baltic. The number of English samples this morning was below an average, and, through the frost, were much improved in condition. Backed by the rise of Saturday, in the country holders demanded more money, and were able to place their best samples at Is. advance, but could get nothing over previous rates for inferior sorts. The change in foreign was more decided, and Is. was made all round for samples, both red and white ; but with signs of a return to mild weather, the market towards the close lost some of its animation. Floating cargoes were generally held for more money, and on Ghirkas an improvement of fully Is. was realised. Monday's advance in London was thoroughly welcomed in the country, and a similar rise of Is. was noted at the following places — viz., Brigg, Birmingham, Hull, Ipswich, Louth, ^larket Rasen, Sleaford, Spilsby, Leeds, Man- chester ; while at Gainsboro', Barnsley, Melton Mowbray. Reading, Newbury, Salisbury, &c., the advance was Is. to Ss. Liverpool on Tuesday was Is. per cental dearer. On Friday the market was dull, but without change. Edinburgh and Leith were up Is., and Glasgow Is. to Is. 6d. per qr. Native wheat was held for more money at Dublin, and foreign obtained 6d. per barrel advance, but closed heavily. On the fourth Monday the English arrivals of wheat were short,. and those from abroad large, more than half being Russian. The show of fresh samples on the Essex and Kentish stands was limited ; and, with a change back to cold weather, factors early in the morning asked more money, but could not obtain it, millers being very careless buyers. In foreign also there was no change, excepting for New Zealand white, which, becoming scarce, obtained rather more money. The floating trade was unaltered. The arrivals into London for four weeks were 21,892 qrs. English wheat, 102,479 qrs foreign, against 18,307 qrs. English, 158,668 qrs. foreign, in 1873. The London exports were 4,696 qrs. The imports into the kingdom for four weeks ending Nov. 14 were 3,721,031 cwt. wheat, 492,368 cwts. flour, against 3,753,729 cwts. wheat, 354,306 cwts. flour in 1873. The London averages commenced at 47s. 5d., and closed at 44s. 8d. ; the general averages opened at 443. Id., and ended with 43s. 9d. The flour trade throughout the month has exhibited very little change excepting in the demand. The top price of towu-made has stood at 43s. White Norfolks have been about 303. to 3Is., and American barrels 25s. to 26s. ; while at Paris the best mark (D) was worth 36s. Extra state at New York has been 18s. 8d. to 19s. 5d. per barrel f.o.b. The country supplies have been good and regular; those from abroad were comparatively light, i'he London imports in four weeks were : in country sorts Sl',Ci4 sacks, in foreign 5,669 sacks 18,603 barrels, against 90,929 sacks country, 4,155 sacks 32,973 barrels foreign in 1873. Of maize the supplies have been uncommonly small ; but its high rates, as compared with barley, have very much limited the demand. Flat mixed American was worth 38s. 6d., and round brought as much as 393. 6d : this shows about Is. 6d. per qr. advance. The four weeks' London imports were 3,891 qrs., against 18,470 qrs. in 1873. The barley trade has strengthened in tone, and gained Is. 6d. both in malting sorts and the lower qualities. The English supplieshavebeen only moderate; and, except- ing the first week, the foreign arrivals have fallen off, and a demand has sprung up from America. The best malting has become worth 49s. and rather more, grinding 29s. to 34s ; while Saale at Hanibro' has brought 50s., supplies being scanty, and fine Holstein 403. It would seem that fine malting descriptions will maintaintheir price all through the season, supplies everywhere being limited. The best French at Paris were not worth over 353. : their quality does not come up to last year's. The value of grinding sorts must be ruled by foreign arrivals, which, if the weather be mild in winter, we expect will be plentiful ; but more so in spring. The four weeks' London supplies were 16,458 qrs. British, 41,667 qrs. foreign, against 20,103 qrs. British, 17,846 qrs. foreign, in 1873. The malt trade throughout the month has been steady, and the value of fine sorts hardened at the close ; the best new worth 723. to 743., fine old 2s. more. From the first fortnight the foreign arrivals of Oats were small ; and though increased on the third Monday, values during the three weeks were improved about Is. perqr. On the fourth Monday, though the imports were con- siderable, and fine sorts, from being only in a small proportion, were rather dearer, and eveu the lower sorts were firm from a large demand. With a return of colder weather and winter commencing, and the fact that every- where this grain has shown a less abundant yield than usual, we cannot for some time look for low rates, as granary stocks are not heavy, and spring, whatever it may bring us, may be late. 40 lbs. sweet Russian sorts are worth 293. 6d., 38 lbs. per bushel 27s., and lower sorts in proportion. For English extra prices are made, especially for heavy weights. The English supplies for four weeks were only 2,907 qrs., Scotch 277 qrs., Irish 222 qrs., foreign 157,849 qrs., against 5,215 qrs. English, 11,642 qrs. Scntch, 5,933 qrs. Irish, and 159,983 qrs. foreign in 1873. Notwithstanding the high prices made, beans have been firm all through the month, the crop being short, and Egyptian supplies vcy scanty, though some have come from Algeria, Italy, and France. The want of maize, however, kept up the demand, and new Harrows are worth 46s. per qr., Mazagans 43s., and old small 54s. ; Egyptians 43s. to 443. ; other foreign more in proportion to dryness and we'ght. None can now come from Morocco, as the Emperor has forbidden the exports. It is, therefore, not likely to be cheap this season. The imports into London for four weeks were 3,427 qrs. English, 8,713 qrs. foreign against 4,129 qrs. English, 4,325 qrs. foreignin 1873 Peas, too, have been steady in price, the English sup- plies having been limited, and there has only been one considerable arrival of foreign, and those wei'e white from Canada. These latter were held at 43s. to 443, perqr., and hog-feeding sorts were about the same. Should the winter be sharp, there is plenty of room for an advance in boilers, but not for other kinds. The London imports were 3,442 qrs. English, 14,900 qrs. foreign, ajainst 5,397 qrs. English, 684 qrs. foreign in 1873. The linseed trade has not varied, but the demand has been limited, from the extreme fineness of the autumn. The imports were 10,523 qrs., against 28,405 qrs. last year Some little business has been passing in red cloverseed, but from an impression it will be dearer, holders have been asking too high rates to lead to large transactions. Some American is on its way worth about 47s. per cwt. In Paris the best red was quoted about 60s. per cwt. It is here worth 653. ; fine English from 80s. to 908. per cwt. Printed by Watson and Hazen,265, Strand, Londoc, W.C. SEVEN INTERNATIONAL MEDALS AWAEDED TO JAMES GIBBS & COMPANY, SOLE MANUFACTURERS OF THE PATEiT ANIMO^IA-FIMEO SUAi\IO* THE CHEAPEST AND BEST MANURE IN USB. Consumers are warned that none is Genuine unless the Bags bear the Trade Mark, and are secured with a Leaden Seal. ALSO, OIBBS' BONE, BLOOD, AND SPECIAL MANURES OE THE BEST QUALITY, AND IN THE HIGHEST CONDITION. PARTICULARS OT JAMES GIBBS AND COMPANY, WORKS: VICTORIA DOCKS, LONDON, E., AND CATTEDOWN, PLYMOUTH. OFFICES— 16, MARK LANE, LONDON, E.G., OR THEIR AGENTS. IMPORTANT TO FLOCKMASTERS, THOMAS BIGG, Agricultural and Yeterinary Chemist, by Appointment to his late Royal Highness The Prince Consort, K.G., Leicester House, Great Dover Street, Borough, London, begs to call the attention of Partners and Graziers to his valuable SHEEP and LAMB DIPPING COMPOSITION, which requires no BoUing, and may be used with Warm or Cold Water, for efiectually destroying the Tick, Lice, and all other insects injurious to the Flock, preventing the alarmmg attacks of Ply and Shab, and cleansing and purifying the Skin, thereby greatly im- proving the Wool, both in quantity and quaUty, and highly Oontributtng to the general health of the animal. Prepared only by Thomas Bigg, Chemist, &c., at his Manu- factory as above, and sold as ioUows, although any other quantity may be had, if required : — i lb. for 20 sheep, price, jar included £0 61b. 30 81b, 40 101b. 50 201b. 100 301b. 150 401b. 200 601b. 250 601b. 300 801b. 400 100 lb. 500 (Cask and measure included) 0 10 0 15 1 0 1 3 1 7 1 17 2 6 Should any Plockmaster prefer boiling the C5omposition, it will be equally effective. MOST IMPORTANT CERTIFICATE. From Mr. Hekepath, the celebrated Analytical Chemist :— Bristol Laboratory, Old Park, January 18th, 1861. Sir,— I have submitted your Sheep Dipping Composition to analysis, and find that the ingredients are well blended, and the mtsture neutral. If it is used according to the directions given, I feel satisfied, that while it eflfectually destroys vermin. It will not injure the hair roots (or "yolk ") in the skin, the fleece, or the carcase. I think it deserves the numerous testimonials published. I am, Sir, yours respectfully, William Hebapath, Sen., P.C.S., &c.. Sec, To Mr. Thomas Bigg Professor of Chemistry. Loieester House, Great lyover-street Borough London. He would also especially call attention to his SPECIFIC, or LOTION, for the SCAB or SHAB, which wiU be found a certain remedy for eradicating that loathsome and ruinoua disorder in Sheep, and which may be safely used in all climates, and at all seasons of the year, and to all descriptions of sheep, even ewes in lamb. Price FIVE SHILLINGS per gallon — sufficient on an average for thirty Sheep (according to the virulence of the disease) ; also in wine quart bottles, IMPORTANT TESTIMONIAL. " Scoulton, near Hingham, Norfolk, April 16th, 1855. "Dear Sir, — In answer to yours of the 4th inst., which would have been repUed to before this had I been at home, I have much pleasure in bearing testimony to the efficacy of your invaluable ' Specific for the cure of Scab in Sheep.' The 600 sheep were all dressed in August last with 84 gallons of the ' NoN-poisoNous Specific,' that was so highly recom- mended at the Lincoln Show, and by their own dresser, the best attention being paid to the flock oy my shepherd after dressing according to instructions left ; but notwithstanding the Scab continued getting worse. Being determined to have the Scab ciu-ed if possible, I wrote to you for a supply of your Specific, which I received the following day; and although the weather was most severe in February during the dressing, your i?PBCiFic proved itself an invahiable remedy, for in three weeks the Sheep were quite curei I ; and I am happy to say the young lambs are doing remarKably well at present. In conclusion, I beUeve it to be the safest and best remedy now in use. " I remain, dear Su", "For JOHN TINGEY, Esq., " To Mr. Thomas Bigg, ' " R. RENNEY, ft-i:" Flockmasters would be well to beware of such pre- parations as " Non-poisonous Compositions :" it is only necessary to appeal to their good common sense and judg- ment to be thoroughly convinced that no " Non-poisonous " article can poison or destroy insect vermin, particularly such as the Tick, Lice, and Scab Parasites — creatures so tenacioiM of life. Such advertised preparations must be wholly useless, or they are not what they are represented to be. DIPPING APPARATUS £H, £5, £4, & £3. bryant&May's MATCHES LONDON AND COUNTT BANKING COMPANT. BSTABLISHED 183«. SUBSCRIBED CAPITAL... £3,000,000, in 60,000 SHARES of £50 EACH. PAID-UP CAPITAL... £1,196,880; INSTALMENTS UNPAID, £3,120 (£1,200,000). EfiSERYE FUND (paid up) ...£598,44,0; INSTALMENTS UNPAID, £1,560 (£600,000), ITATHANIEL ALEXANDER, Esq. T. TYRINGHAM BERNARD, Esq. THCWklAS STOCK COWIE, Esq. IREDERICK FRANCIS, Esq. Joint General Managers- OHIEP INSPBCTOE. W. J. NORFOLK, Esq. DIBECTOBS. FREDERICK HAR&ISON, Esq. WM. CHAMPION JONES, Esq. E. HARBORD LtJSHINGTON, Esq JAMES MORLEY, Esq. %ILLIAM McKEWAN, Esq. and WHITBREAD TOMSON, Esq. CHIEF ACCOUNTANT. SECRBTABY. JAMES GRAY, EsQ. GEORGE GOUGH, Esq. WILLIAM NICOL, Esq. A. HODGSON PHILLPOTTS, Esq, JAMES DUNCAN THOMSON, ESq, FREDERICK YOULE, Esq. HEAD OFFICE, 21, LOMBARD STREET. MA1IA6BB— WHITBREAD TOMSON, Esq. | Assistant Manager— WILLIAM HOWARD, Esq. THE LONDON AND COUNTY BANK opens— DRAWING ACCOUNTS with Commercial Houses and Private Individoals, either upon the plan usually adopted Iw other Bankers, or by charging a small Commission to those persons to whom it may not be convenient to sustain an agrfyl Permanent BaJance. DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS.— Deposit Receipts are issued for sums of Money placed upon these Accounts, and Interest i* allowed for such peri'ids and at such rates as may be agreed upon, reference being had to the state of the Money Market. CIRCULAR NOTES AND LETTERS OP CRBDIT are issued, payable in the principal Cities and Towns of the Cob- ttnenti in Australia, Canada, India, and China, the United States, and elsewhere. The Agency of Foreign and Country Banks is undertaken. The Pdbchabb and SA.I.B of Government and other Stocks, of English or Foreign Shares eflfected, and DxriDBSOt, AinruiTiBS, &c , received for Customers of the Bank. Great facilities are also afforded to the Customers of the Bank for the receipt of Money from the Tow^s ijvhere the Oom^ pany has Branches. ^ The Officera of the Bank are bound not to disclose the transactions of any of its Customers. By Order of fJie Directors, WM. MoKE WAN, > Joint (Jeneral WHITBREAD TOMSON, i Managers.