L I B R.ARY OF THE. UNIVERSITY Of ILLINOIS C30.7 •tto.499-513 cop- 2 AGRICULTURE s^lX's $50 oo"" Ubrafy M8tftrial81 The Mlnlmu"> * The person charging this material is responsible for its return to the library from which it was withdrawn on or before the Latest Date stamped below. Theft mutilation, and underlining of books are reasons for discipli- ?o ™« ?,"r T"!: re9U'! in di9mi8Sal from the University. To renew call Telephone Center, 333-8400 URBANA-CHAMPAIGN L16I— O-1096 FARMING in CUMBERLAND COUNTY . . . In the Claypan Region of Southern mots A study of the effect of differences in soil and topography . . . By R. C. ROSS, V. B. FIELDER, and G. H. WALTER Bulletin 506 NIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS • AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION cooperation with BUREAU OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE »i FOREWORD r"pHE KIND OF FARMING that prevails in a region is, of course, •^ the result of many complex influences: soil, climate, markets, people. In areas where farming has deteriorated until it no longer provides an adequate living, it is especially important that the in- fluences that have been and are at work be understood if real solu- tions for the problems that have developed are to be formulated. The area chosen for this study is one where farming has long failed to provide a satisfactory income for a large share of the families attempting to live on the land. The problems have been ac- centuated by war conditions. It is hoped that the analysis presented in this bulletin may be of value not only to those interested in the problems of this particular area, but also to those who may under- take similar investigations of other areas and who therefore may be interested in the methods used. Many members of the staff of the Illinois Agricultural Experi- ment Station and the Bureau of Agricultural Economics, U. S. De- partment of Agriculture, participated in this study. The work of the Illinois Station was done under the direction of an interdepartmental committee consisting of R. S. SMITH, Agronomy, Chairman; H. C. M. CASE, Agricultural Economics; W. B. NEVENS, Dairy Cattle Feeding; and R. R. SNAPP, Beef Cattle Husbandry. Under this committee R. C. Ross acted as coordinator for all departments of the Station. Part of the material on woodlands and pastures was selected from special reports by J. N. SPAETH, Forestry, and R. F. FUELLEMAN, Crop Production. Acknowledgment is due also the following people who assisted in the collection of data: E. A. DUERST, K. E. KINSINGER, G. A. LEE, E. N. SEARLS, and L. H. SIMERL, all of the Department of Agricul- tural Economics, University of Illinois; and PAUL T. VEAL, Bureau of Agricultural Economics, U. S. Department of Agriculture. CONTENTS PAGE CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND THE CLAYPAN REGION ..278 POPULATION AND AGRICULTURAL TRENDS 282 FIVE MAJOR SOIL AREAS 285 Hilly 285 Light-gray prairie 287 Dark-gray prairie 289 River bottom 290 Morainal 290 FARMING IN THE DIFFERENT SOIL AREAS 291 Principal Uses of the Land 291 Cropping Systems Followed 293 Yields of Principal Crops 296 Livestock Numbers and Practices 299 Tenure and Ages of Operators 301 Incomes From Farming 302 LEVEL OF LIVING 305 RECENT SHIFTS IN PRODUCTION 310 Wartime Maximum Production 310 Long-Time Desirable Production 312 RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUMMARY 312 Better farming practices 313 Greater use of limestone 314 Revision of cropping systems 315 Pasture improvement 316 Better woodland management 316 Larger farming units 317 Livestock adjustments 317 Improvement of living conditions 319 Urbana, Illinois November, 1944 Publications in the Bulletin series report the results of investigations made or sponsored by the Experiment Station FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY A Study of the Effect of Differences in Soil and Topography By R. C. Ross, V. B. FIELDER, and G. H. WALTER' THE CLAYPAN REGION of southern Illinois, comprizing approximately 7.5 million acres, is characterized by small farms, low farm incomes, and soils of low productivity. These soils, which are not suited to the methods of farming practiced in more productive areas, have not been used for purposes for which they are best adapted ; this has led to a low standard of living for a large number of farm families and to widespread need for public assistance. Economic and social problems have been intensified by the financial burden of school districts, townships, and counties which are too small and numerous. Because of the extent of this region and the low level of living which many of the farms afford, it was considered desirable to try to ascertain the effect which differences in soils and topography have had on the farming and living conditions in the region, and to suggest adjustments which will improve the general welfare of the farm families living there. Cumberland county lies in the northern part of this region and is representative of the region as a whole (Figs. 1 and 2). As early as 1932 an interdepartmental land-use committee of the College of Agri- culture recommended it for a comprehensive land-use study. For the present study the county was divided into five areas on the basis of topography and soil (Fig. 6, page 288). These areas are described as hilly, light-gray prairie, dark-gray prairie, river bottom, and morainal. Farm-survey records were obtained from an average of about 55 rural families selected at random in each area. These records were supplemented by special field surveys on pastures, soil erosion, and woodland. County records were used for data on public assistance and assessed value of land and improvements ; additional data on pub- lic assistance were obtained from records of the Old Age Assistance 1R. C. Ross, Chief in Farm Management, University of Illinois; V. B. FIELDER, formerly State Representative in Illinois of the Bureau of Agricultural Economics, U. S. Department of Agriculture; and G. H. WALTER, Assistant Agricultural Economist, Bureau of Agricultural Economics, U.S.D.A. 277 278 BULLETIN No. 506 [November, Administration, Works Progress Administration, and the Illinois Emergency Relief Commission. The first part of this study is a comparison of Cumberland county with three areas: the entire type-of-f arming area of which it is a part (No. 7) ; Type-of- Farming area 4a (which represents the most productive land in the state) ; and the state as a whole. These compari- sons provide a setting for the sections that follow, especially for the applicability of the findings to the claypan region as a whole. Popula- tion and agricultural trends in Cumberland county are treated next. Then follows the principal part of the study, a description of the physical characteristics of the five major soil areas in the county and an analysis of the farm-survey records for each of these areas. A concluding section summarizes the more important findings and recom- mends adjustments, indicating procedures for achieving them. CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND THE CLAYPAN REGION Cumberland county has the various kinds of soil and topography which are commonly found in the claypan region. These include prairie and timber soils that are low in productivity and nearly level; rough, hilly lands adjacent to streams ; and large areas of river-bottom land. The representative nature of the county is further indicated by the fact that the seven soil types which constitute 71 percent of its area occupy 79 percent of the claypan region.1 Except in the bottomland, the soils of the region are old, mature, silt loams, badly leached and strongly acid. They are usually gray and have developed a claypan within 2 feet or less of the surface on the nearly level areas. This claypan not only impedes the downward movement of water but also cuts off its upward movement at times when there is rapid evaporation from the surface ; this causes the soil to dry out. As a result, near crop failures frequently occur if rainfall is either excessive or scanty during the growing season. The proportion of the various grades of soil in Cumberland county is almost the same as for the 13 counties of Area 7, only .26 percent of which is in soil grade No. 3 or better. In the 18 counties of Area 4a, on the other hand, 57.8 percent of the land grades No. 3 or better (Table 1). A relatively high proportion of farms in Cumberland county are JThe proportions of these soil types vary greatly among counties. 1944] FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY 279 TABLE 1. — PERCENTAGES OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY AND OTHER ILLINOIS AREAS IN VARIOUS SOIL GRADES* Soil grade Cumberland county Area 7: southern Illinois Area 4a: east-central Illinois Entire state 1 to 3 8 .26 57.8 30.8 4 to 7 23.0 22.2 37.8 37.9 8 to 10 76.2 77.6 4.4 31.3 •From Soil Report 69. Cumberland County Soils, University of Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station, 1940. The index numbers assigned to a soil type for production of field crops is based on the ability of the type to produce the major crops grown in the region without soil treatment but with the soil in a cleared and drained condition. The scale used is 1 to 10, the most productive ^oil in the state being rated as 1 and the least productive as 10. small. In 1940, 51 percent in this county and 58 percent in Area 7 had less than 100 acres, whereas only 26 percent in Area 4a were this small (Table 2). Nearly 33 percent of the farms in Area 7 were under 50 acres, whereas less than 14 percent in Area 4a had less than 50 acres. Soils of low productivity of course mean low income per acre; when low productivity is combined with small size, very low incomes result. In 1939, 68 percent of all the farms in Cumberland county and 80 percent of those in Area 7 produced gross incomes of less than $1,000 (Table 3). In Area 4a only 18 percent yielded incomes this TABLE 2. — PERCENTAGE OF FARMS IN SPECIFIED SIZE-GROUPS" Size of farm Cumberland county Area 7: southern Illinois Area 4a: east-central Illinois Entire state acres Under SO . 27.8 32.6 13.8 21.0 50- 99 23.5 25.5 12.2 17.9 100-179 29.5 25.2 34.5 31.7 180-259 12.5 10.0 21.7 16.7 260-499 6.2 6.0 15.9 11.3 500 and over 5 .7 1.9 1.4 •U. S. Census, 1940. TABLE 3. — PERCENTAGE OF FARMS WITH SPECIFIED GROSS INCOME, 1939* Income Cumberland county Area 7: southern Illinois Area 4a: east-central Illinois Entire state Under J600 $ 600-$ 999... 1 000- 1 499.. 1 500- 2 499.. 2 500- 3 999.. 4 000 and over . 49.4 18.8 13.8 10.7 5.1 2.2 61.9 18.2 9.5 7.0 2.2 1.2 12.4 5.9 7.9 20.1 26.3 27.4 29.0 12.2 11.7 17.7 15.3 14.1 •U. S. Census, 1940. 280 BULLETIN No. 506 {November, General productivity and adaptation of Illinois soils. Cumberland county, marked with a cross, lies at the northern edge of the claypan region of southern Illinois, which is occupied largely by soils of low to moderate productivity. (These area designations should not be confused with the rating scale for soil grades referred to in Table 1 and in the footnotes on several pages.) (Fig. 1) KEY TO SYMBOLS: I — General farming soils of high productivity. II — Moder- ately productive soils adapted to small grains, soybeans, meadow, and pasture. Ill — Low to moderately productive soils adapted to cowpeas, soybeans, small grains, meadow, and pasture. IV — Soils adapted to general farming, livestock and dairy farming; variable in productivity because of variation in drainage conditions and erosion. V — Soils adapted to pasture and meadow, orchards, and timber; therefore to dairying, livestock farming, and orcharding. VI — Sand regions ; soils adapted to special crops such as melons, sweet potatoes, etc. VII — Large bottoms, some with an overflow hazard. (Prepared by Department of Agronomy, University of Illinois) 1944} FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY 281 Cumberland county is representative of Farming Type Area 7. About half the claypan region of southern Illinois is included in these 13 counties. Gen- eral rather than specialized farming is the rule, and the farms are small. Area 4a, consisting of 18 counties and lying above Area 7, represents the most productive land in the state. (Fid- 2) low. For 62 percent of the farms in Area 7 the gross farm income was less than $600; in Area 4a only 12 percent had this low an income. Public assistance has been more widespread in southern Illinois than in other parts of the state. A number of counties in this region have carried a large chronic relief load. This has been particularly true of a few counties in which coal mining is an important industry. If 282 BULLETIN No. 506 [November, TABLE 4. — PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL POPULATION DEPENDENT ON FIVE TYPES OF PUBLIC ASSISTANCE" Year and month Cumberland county Area 7: southern Illinois Area 4a: east-central Illinois Entire state 1939 Julv... 20.9 28.1 14.6 15.4 194O January 22.4 27.3 14.5 14.9 July 16.7 22.4 11.6 12.1 1941* January 15.1 24.2 12.6 12.3 July 10.1 18.2 7.6 8.3 "Monthly reports of the Illinois Public Aid Commission. The five types of public assistance are: general relief. Works Progress Administration, old-age assistance, blind pensions, and mothers' pensions. bOn basis of the total 1940 population. these heavy coal-producing areas are excluded, the proportion of peo- ple receiving public assistance in Area 7 has been similar to that in Cumberland county. In recent years about twice as large a percentage of the total population in Area 7 as in Area 4a has been dependent upon five types of public assistance (Table 4)»< Many other conditions in Cumberland county, such as state of public health, availability of farm facilities such as electricity, hard roads, telephones, etc., low value of land and buildings and amount of state aid to schools, are also similar to those in the claypan region as a whole. Thus Cumberland county is not only representative of the claypan region in general but it is especially representative of that portion designated as Type-of- Farming Area 7. That the economic level of agriculture in the whole of the claypan region is low is shown by comparison of Cumberland county with Type-of-Farming Area 4a. POPULATION AND AGRICULTURAL TRENDS Cumberland county is relatively small both in area and in popula- tion.1 The population reached a peak of 16,124 in 1900, then steadily declined to 10,419 in 1930 and increased to 11,698 in 1940.2 The farm population declined even more rapidly (52 percent) from 1900 to 1930, and has increased at a somewhat slower rate since 1930. The recent gain was partly due to the depression, which caused a movement away from the city and to the country. Since Cumberland county is , close to 'The county contains about 350 square miles and ranks 84th in size among the 102 counties of Illinois. 'The number of families declined from 3,571 in 1900 to 2,825 in 1930, and the average size of family declined from 4.5 persons to 3.7 persons. 1944"} FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY 283 several small cities, this movement raised its total population, and the farm population followed the trend of the total population. In 1940 only 30 percent of the people in the county lived in villages of more than 100 persons. The population of the four principal towns was lower in 1930 than it had been for several decades; but by 1940 it was 17 percent over that of 1930, this increase accounting for 40 per- cent of the total increase in the county. In 1940, 10.3 percent of the population were 65 years old or older, whereas only 7.2 percent of the people of the state as a whole were that old. Most of Cumberland county lies in an area of mixed farming, altho the western part of the county is in the wheat, dairy, and poultry area (Area 6). General rather than specialized farming has been the rule. About 71 percent of the land in farms is tillable. Approximately 56 percent of this tillable land is used in growing grain and hay crops and about one-third is in pasture. According to the 1940 Census, 42 per- cent of the farms drew their major incomes in 1939 from livestock and livestock products, 23 percent from field crops, and 32 percent from farm products used by the farm household (subsistence- type farms). The percentage of farms operated by full owners, part owners, and tenants has remained relatively constant since 1900. In 1940 full owners operated 43.8 percent of the farms ; part owners, 25.7 percent ; and tenants, 30.4 percent. Percentages given in Census reports begin- ning with 1900 have not ranged more than 3 points from these per- centages. The proportion of land operated by each tenure group has also been relatively uniform for the past twenty years. Because of the limited amount of feed produced per acre, livestock numbers have been low. The number of cattle has, however, increased gradually over a long period. Cattle kept mainly for milk are the most important class of livestock, altho only 124 farms drew their major source of income from dairy products in 1939. Nearly all dairy cattle are of grade breeding. Herds frequently contain both dairy and beef animals or animals of nondescript type. On many farms cattle are kept only to utilize feed and pasture and to supply the family with dairy products ; on these farms little attention is given to breed. The few beef -cattle herds are found only on the larger farms. Few farmers buy feeder cattle. While the number of hogs has declined in the last few decades, some are raised on most farms. In years when feed is plentiful con- siderable numbers are fed, especially in the better corn-producing areas and on the larger farms. When feed supplies are short, many farmers sell feeder pigs. There are few purebred herds in the county. 284 BULLETIN No. 506 [November, Altho the number of sheep has been fairly constant for the past forty years, it is much below that of the early years of the county. Very few flocks are found there now even tho the rough and rolling land is suited to them. As mechanization has gradually taken place, the number of horses has declined. The poultry enterprise has been important, tho available data do not show definite trends (Table 5). While the condition of poultry houses is generally better than that of other farm buildings, the flocks kept often exceed the capacity of the houses. Thruout the county the poultry shows better breeding than other livestock, no doubt because of the practice of buying chicks from hatcheries, which in turn buy eggs from flocks of improved breeding. The general-purpose breeds predominate. TABLE 5. — PROPORTIONS OF FARM LAND IN SPECIFIED CROPS, AND NUMBER OF LIVESTOCK PER 100 ACRES OF FARM LAND, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS* Percent, of area in — Number of livestock per 100 acres of farm landb Year Corn Oats Wheat Soy- Tame beans hay All cattle M,ilk cows Sheep Swine Horses Poultry 1880... 18 4 4.6 13.4 7.5 4.4 7.5 6.7 5.3 7.4 6.7 6.8 1.7 2.7 2.4 2.4 2.7 2.7 3.4 2.6 2.4 1.6 1.9 1.4 2.3 1.3 12.8 17.0 15.0 9.3 11.5 6.7 7.7 2.5 3.6 4.6 4.5 4.8 2.8 2.0 (') 119.3 79.1 96.4 142.0 1890 . . 22 4 11.9 5.0 16 3 1900 . . 26 g 9.7 1.4 19.5 1910 . . . . 23 S 6 5 4.4 18 0 1920 . . 19 7 10.0 6.7 17.5 1930 1940 . . 18 . . 22 ,2 ,6 4.7 4.0 2.1 1.8 4.2 16.2 11.8 12.0 •U. S. Census Reports, 1880-1940. bSome variations, particularly in swine numbers, result from variations in time of year and in classifications of Census data. "Not available. Corn has long been the principal crop, with soybeans, hay, oats, wheat, and broomcorn grown in smaller amounts. The acreage of oats and wheat has varied considerably and in recent years has been much smaller than formerly (Table 5). A part of the acreage thus vacated has been used for soybeans, which now occupy an area considerably greater than the combined acreage of oats and wheat. Commercial apple production, rather important in the western part of the county two decades ago, has almost disappeared. Because of the relatively large area in pasture, the quality of the pastures has a marked effect not only upon the kinds and numbers of livestock kept but also upon the farm income. In the hilly area are large amounts of untillable land. Many pastures in this area are pastures in name only, consisting of fields that were cultivated until no longer productive and then turned into pastures. They are usually badly eroded and therefore poor. Livestock furnish a use for a large part of the crops grown, and 1944] FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY 285 on many farms livestock and livestock products provide a major pro- portion of the farm income. The limited crop sales are largely of soy- beans and broomcorn, with some corn and wheat in good years. In most years the county buys somewhat more feed grains than it sells.1 Dairy products are marketed by several methods. Some whole milk is assembled by trucks for shipment to St. Louis, some is sent to Mat- toon, and some to a cheese factory at Neoga. One or more cream stations are maintained in each trading center in the county. FIVE MAJOR SOIL AREAS Satisfactory analysis of farming and farm living conditions in an area as varied in topographic features and soils as is Cumberland county can be made only by studying the markedly different areas as separate units. Cumberland county divides naturally into the five major areas described here and called soil-group areas because each consists of groups of certain well-defined soil types, which in turn are closely related to the slope of the land. Of course there are marked differences within each of these five designated areas, but those differences are not great enough or extensive enough to mar the essential unity of each area. Two of these areas — the river-bottom and the morainal areas — are single continuous units ; each of the other three consists of two or more widely scattered tracts. The hilly areas (H), totalling 120 square miles, include those portions of the county which are dissected by numerous small streams.2 The characteristic topographic features are the short steep slopes bor- dering the flat bottomland along small creeks and the nearly level remnants of upland that are interspersed thruout the broken land (Figs. 4 and 5). In general, these slopes are covered with timber or young growth like that found on most of the woodland of the county. Cropland consists largely of the bottomland bordering streams and small areas of flat poorly drained upland of low productivity. 'In 1938 only two grain elevators were in operation within the county. The amounts of grain handled are small, the business consisting largely of grinding feed and handling supplies. 'This area contains both upland and bottomland soils. The principal upland soil types are Hickory gravelly loam, rating 10, with slopes of 15 percent or greater; Bluford silt loam, rating 8, with slopes ranging from 1.5 to 3 percent; and Wynoose silt loam, rating 9, with slopes ranging from 0 to 1.5 percent. The principal bottomland soils are Huntsville loam, Sharon loam, and Bonnie silt loam, rating 5, 6, and 7. (See footnote, Table 1, for an explanation of these ratings.) 286 BULLETIN No. 506 [November, Woodland areas in Cumberland county at time of settlement. Most of the hilly, morainal, and river-bottom areas at this time, about 1830, were heavily wooded. (Fig. 3) Woodland areas in Cumberland county in 1939. These areas are now largely on the short steep slopes adjacent to bottomland. (Fig. 4) 1944~\ FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY 287 In the hilly areas a large proportion of the upland is too steep to be culti- vated. It is best to keep land of this kind in pasture and timber. The slopes erode easily when not protected by trees or grass. (Fig. 5) Compact subsoil and lack of organic matter hinder absorption of water; the sloping soils in this area therefore erode easily unless they are well-protected by trees or grass. Erosion is frequently severe at the point where soils of different slopes meet. The post-oak flats (Wynoose silt loam), for example, have a tight subsoil and must be drained by surface ditches. But if outlets are not well-protected, these ditches frequently cause gullies at the break in topography. Too intensive cropping or pasturing at this break may also cause serious erosion, especially where soils slope steeply. Bottomland soils of streams rising in or above the glacial moraine produce good yields as they have been partly formed of sediment from the highly productive soil of east-central Illinois. Bottomland soils of streams originating below this moraine are of low productivity since their watersheds are the adjacent hills and uplands which con- tain soils of low productive capacity. The light-gray prairie areas (LP) He in five widely scattered tracts and total 116 square miles (Fig. 6). The soils include some of the poorest prairie types of the state.1 Because of the flat topography and the claypan subsoil, adequate drainage in most of this area is a serious 'Cisne silt loam, rating 9, predominates ; Newberry silt loam, rating 7, and Hoyleton silt loam, rating 8, are less extensive. The former are nearly level ; the latter has slopes from 1.2 to 3.5 percent. (See footnote, Table 1, for explanation of rating scale.) 288 BULLETIN No. 506 [November, 19441 FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY 289 In the prairie areas most of the land is flat and difficult to drain because of the impermeable claypan subsoil. Small natural drainageways are frequently wooded. (Fig. 7) problem. Drainage is generally provided by small surface ditches. Only 5 percent of the yearly rainfall percolates thru the predominant soil type, whereas in the best agricultural soils in the state 25 percent of the water gets thru.1 While the small amount of gently rolling soil naturally has good surface drainage, the subsoil is permeable only slowly. Gully erosion is of little importance, but there is considerable sheet erosion on soils with slopes of as little as 1.2 to 3.5 percent — soils usually under cultivation. The dark-gray prairie areas (DP) lie in three localities and total 55 square miles. Tho they include some light-gray soil, they are made up largely of the better grade of dark-gray prairie soil2 (Fig. 6). The topography is nearly level, and soil erosion is negligible. Drainage is a serious problem since the impermeable subsoil blocks both natural and artificial underdrainage. Before 1900 drainage districts were formed in the dark-gray prairie area of the northwest part of the county and many tile were laid. This venture proved unsuccessful and surface ditches came to be recognized as the only satisfactory method of drainage. 'Percolation experiments conducted by the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station. Figures are average of years 1936, 1937, and 1938. The comparison given above is between Cisne silt loam and Muscatine silt loam. 2Ebbert silt loam, with a crop productivity rating of 7, is the most extensive soil type; there are considerable areas also of Putnam silt loam (now correlated with Cowden), rating 8, and Cisne silt loam, rating 9. The slopes range from 0 to 1.2 percent. 290 BULLETIN No. 506 {November, The bottomland along the rivers is often covered in the spring by flood waters, but the floods come too early to do much damage to crops. Farm- steads, pastures, and wood lots are on higher land. (Fig. 8) The river-bottom area (R) includes the Embarrass river bottom and the adjoining hill lands (Fig. 6), 31 square miles in all.1 Altho this area contains both valley and hill land, it has been considered a single area because the farm units ordinarily include both bottomland and the adjoining hill land. Farmsteads, pastures, and wood lots are located on the hill land, while grain crops are produced on the bottomlands. The character of this hill land and its erosion problems are similar to those of the hilly areas. Altho the bottomlands are subject to overflow, floods seldom cause much damage to crops since they usually occur before spring planting; the damage is confined largely to washouts in roads, deposits of sand on fields, and delays in field work. This bottomland was developed, in part, from soil material from the dark-colored soil region of east- central Illinois which is drained by the Embarrass river. It is the only extensive area in the county that is naturally fertile and produces good yields. The morainal area (M), totalling 27 square miles, includes a terminal moraine and morainal outwash which extends about 3 miles south of the northern edge of the county (Fig. 6). This area is not 'This bottomland soil is largely Huntsville loam. The adjoining hill land is Hickory gravelly loam and Bluford silt loam. See footnote 2, page 285. 1944~\ FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY 291 representative of the claypan region. Its soils are more varied than those of any of the other soil-group areas, ranging from the best to the poorest of the state.1 These soils are dark and do not have the imper- vious subsoil which is characteristic of most of the other upland soils in the county. Rolling topography is characteristic of this area (Fig. 6). Drainage is not a problem except as it causes soil erosion. This area contains the county's most serious erosion problem, as a large propor- tion of the rolling land is under cultivation; extensive soil losses from sheet and gully erosion have occurred. FARMING IN THE DIFFERENT SOIL AREAS Farm-survey records show marked differences among the five soil- group areas of Cumberland county in size of farms, proportion of land in crops and pastures, proportions of the various crops grown, amounts of livestock, and income per acre. Altho about the same number of records was obtained in each area (Table 6) and this sample was considered adequate, the differences in the sizes of these areas need to be kept in mind as the more extensive areas are also the less productive.2 Principal Uses of the Land The hilly area, which has the poorest soils and the most broken topography, also has the smallest farms, averaging 121 acres. In con- trast, the most productive areas (river-bottom and dark-gray prairie) have the largest farms, averaging 204 and 210 acres (Table 7). The hilly area also has the smallest proportion of farm land in crops and the highest proportion of nontillable pasture and timber not pastured. The percentage of the farm area in pasture at the time of this 'Westville silt loam, rating 7, with slopes ranging from 7 to 15 percent, is the major soil type. Others are Drummer clay loam, Osceola silt loam, and Hen- nepin gravelly loam, rating 1, 6, and 10. The two former types are nearly level, while the latter is too steep for cultivation and is almost entirely covered with trees. 2Within these areas 28 records were secured which were classed as nonfarm because no cropland was involved. Some of these records were obtained from landowners who rented out all the cropland but kept a few acres of pasture and some livestock; others had a garden and very limited pasture and kept a cow, a few pigs, and chickens to supply the family needs ; still others merely occupied the house and in some cases had a small garden. Most of these records represented people who were either employed in town or were receiving public assistance. They were not included in the analysis of farming in the county. 292 BULLETIN No. 506 [November, TABLE 6. — SIZE OF SOIL-GROUP AREAS AND EXTENT OF SAMPLES INCLUDED IN THE FARM SURVEY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, 1939 Area Size of area* Percent of area surveyed Farms surveyed Number Average size Hilly (H) acres 76 800 9.1 12.8 31.1 51.5 42.4 20.2 52 56 47 45 52 252 acres 121 152 210 204 127 Light-gray prairie (LP) 74 240 Dark-gray prairie (DP) 35 200 River bottom (R) 19 840 Morainal (M) 17 280 All areas 222 080b •Estimated. bU. S. Census. 1940. survey ranged from 26 in the light-gray prairie area to 44 in the hilly area. In the prairie and morainal areas a large proportion of the pastureland is tillable, whether it is rotated with cropland or kept in permanent pasture; but in the hilly and river-bottom areas more than half the pasture area is untillable, representing, for the most part, broken and partially timbered land. In each area are small acreages of timber which were not pastured, the most extensive acreages being in the hilly and river-bottom areas. In all areas the proportion of cropland was smallest on the small farms, increasing rapidly with size of farm until the farms exceeded 100 acres, after which little change occurred until the farms reached 500 acres. The hilly area has more small farms than any other area. Of the farms included in this survey, 50 percent in the hilly area and 52 percent in the morainal area were less than 100 acres in size; whereas only 19 to 24 percent were this small in the other three areas (Table 8). In the more-productive areas, dark-gray prairie and river-bottom, 26 and 22 percent respectively of the farms consisted of 260 acres or more; whereas in the hilly area the proportion of farms this large was only 6 percent and in the morainal area 8 percent. The TABLE 7. — UTILIZATION OF LAND IN FARMS IN DIFFERENT SOIL-GROUP AREAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, 1939" (Acres per farm used for purposes indicated) Hilly Light prairie Dark prairie River bottom Morainal Crop area ... 55 100 134 122 78 Rotation pasture 4 10 15 3 10 Permanent tillable pasture 22 24 43 18 20 Nontillable pasture 28 6 8 42 9 Timber not pastured 7 2 3 8 3 Otherb . . . . 5 10 7 11 7 All farm land 121 152 210 204 127 •Farm survey. blncludes idle land, fruit, farmsteads, and waste. 1944] FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY 293 TABLE 8. — PERCENTAGE OF FARMS OF DIFFERENT SIZES IN THE DIFFERENT SOIL-GROUP AREAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, 1939a Size of farm All areas Hilly Light prairie Dark prairie River bottom Moral nal acres Under 30 6 8 4 2 7 12 30- 49 8 17 4 2 13 50- 99 19 25 16 17 11 27 100-179 33 27 44 34 29 27 180-259 20 17 21 21 29 13 260-499 11 6 11 17 18 6 500 and over 3 9 4 2 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 •Farm survey. Of the 28 families surveyed which were listed as nonfarm because of having no cropland, 14 would be classed as farms in the Census; of these, 11 would be in the group under 30 acres, 2 in the 30-49-acre group, and 1 in the 100-1 79-acre group. fact that the poor-soil areas have the greatest proportion of small farms and the smaller farms have the lowest proportion of cropland explains why there are such variations in farm incomes among the various soil-group areas. These income-depressing conditions are most significant in the hilly area because of its extent. Other differences between areas are seen in the percentage of un- tillable land on the farms of each area (Table 9). In an area of general farming, limited acreages of untillable land, if reasonably productive for pasture, can of course be utilized to advantage with livestock. In the hilly and river-bottom areas 43 and 33 percent, respectively, of the survey farms were more than 40 per- cent untillable. This situation was less serious in the river-bottom area than in the hilly area because the farm units there were larger and the cropland more productive. Cropping Systems Followed The use made of the crop area appeared to have little relation to the productive capacity of the land. Corn was the outstanding crop in TABLE 9. — PERCENTAGE OF UNTILLABLE LAND IN SURVEYED FARMS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, BY SOIL-GROUP AREAS, 1939" Untillable land Hilly Light prairie Dark prairie River bottom Morainal All areas perct. None 50 73 9 40 35 1-20 . 21 39 19 18 40 28 21-40 36 11 6 40 14 21 41-60 27 2 24 6 11 More than 60 16 9 5 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 •Farm survey. 294 BULLETIN No. 506 [November, The largest areas of productive soils are in the bottomlands. A large pro- portion of the corn grown in the county is grown on these fertile areas, where it can be planted when the spring floods have subsided. (Fig. 9) each area, occupying from 38 to 54 percent of the cropland (Table 10). In the hilly area the high proportion of land in corn resulted from the desire of the farmers to grow the maximum amount of feed on their limited crop area; in the river-bottom area the land is suited to corn because of its fertility and because corn can be planted after the spring floods have subsided. Broomcorn was grown to some extent as a cash- crop substitute for corn in all areas, but it was planted most extensively Good stands of sweet clover can be grown on the flat prairie soils after they have been well limed. On the larger farms much more of the land has been Ikned than on the smaller farms. (Fig. 10) 1944] FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY 295 Post oak flats in the hilly areas are low in fertility and poorly adapted to grain crops. Fields are frequently idle. (Fig. 11) in the dark-gray prairie area and least extensively in the river-bottom area, where corn yields are the highest in the county. Soybean acreage ranked next to corn in all areas except in the river bottom, where it took third place. In all areas more than half the soybeans were harvested for hay, and on the smaller farms nearly all the crop was so used. Soybeans thus supplement the limited acreage of other legume hays. The acreage in small grains usually did not exceed one-third that in corn. Many of the farms with a small crop area grew little or no small grain since the very limited acreages did not justify the maintenance of harvesting equipment. Legume hays were found only in limed areas and in areas in the Embarrass river bottom which do not require liming. Timothy was widely distributed thruout the county, being used either alone or with redtop on soils of low pro- ductivity which had received no treatment. Tho cropping practices too intensive for the soil were found every- TABLE 10. — PERCENTAGE OF CROPLAND IN DESIGNATED CROPS IN THE DIFFERENT SOIL-GROUP AREAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, 1939" Crop Hilly Light prairie Dark prairie River bottom Morainal Corn . 53 41 38 54 47 Broomcorn 6 6 13 3 6 Small grains 11 16 12 18 7 is 17 26 13 16 Legume hay 9 4 1 7 5 Timothy hay 4 6 7 2 11 Other crops 2 10 3 3 8 •Farm survey. 296 BULLETIN No. 506 [November, where in the county, they were most common on farms with a small crop area. On farms with less than 40 acres of cropland, 80 to 100 percent of the crop area was frequently given over to corn, broomcorn, and soybeans for hay. This intensive cropping resulted from efforts of these farmers to produce maximum amounts of feed and sale crops for current income even tho such practices deplete the soil and contribute to erosion. In bottomland subject to overflow, the deposit of silt at flood time offset, to a large extent, the effects of destructive cropping; but on the uplands the results were cumulative. Yields of Principal Crops Because of variations in rainfall, crop yields in Cumberland county vary widely from year to year.1 For the thirteen years from 1929 thru 1941 average acre-yields in bushels, as reported by the Illinois Cooper- ative Crop-Reporting Service, were: corn, 29.2; oats, 20.6; winter wheat, 14.7; and soybeans, 12.7. For the four years 1933-1936 growing conditions were unfavorable, and the average yields of these crops TABLE 11. — CROP YIELDS PER ACRE BY SOIL-GROUP AREAS, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, 1938a Crop Hilly Light prairie Dark prairie River bottom Morainal Weighted average, all areas Corn '...., bu. 36*> bu. 35 bu. 40 bu. 53 bu. 44 bu. 39 Oats 19 22 22 27 29 23 Wheat 12 16 21 20 20 17 Soybeans 12 15 22 20 17 17 •Farm survey. bln the hilly area a considerable part of the corn acreage is in the creek bottoms, which are much more productive than the upland soils. were about 25 percent less. For the following five years, 1937-1941, conditions were unusually favorable and yields were similar to those of 1938. A comparison of the 1938 yields in each of the soil-group areas shows clearly the differences in production due to the character of the soil (Table 11). Since a large part of the raised feed is fed, a series of poor crop years curtails the numbers of livestock kept, while a series of good years causes livestock numbers to increase. Thus the favorable crop yields of 1937 and of 1938 caused an increase not only in the amount 'Altho the average annual rainfall for the period 1919 thru 1939 was 41.06 inches, it varied from 30.4 inches in 1925 to 65.2 inches in 1927 (Cumberland County Soil Report, University of Illinois, Urbana). 1944~\ FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY TABLE 12. — AVERAGE ANNUAL CROP YIELDS PER ACRE ON THE TOLEDO EXPERIMENT FIELD IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, 1913-1939a 297 Treatment Corn 26 crops Oats 25 crops Wheat 22 crops Hay 24 crops bu. 20 bu. 14 bu. 8 tons .2 Manure 33 19 13 .5 Manure and lime 45 31 24 1.6 45 31 25 1.6 Residues 22 14 9 .3 28 29 20 1.1 Residues, lime, and rock phosphate 28 30 24 1.3 Residues, lime, rock phosphate, and potash 46 33 30 1.8 •Data supplied by Department of Agronomy, Illinois' Agricultural Experiment Station. of crops sold and on hand but also in the number of livestock kept and in the proportion fed out for market. In the area where production is limited by low soil fertility, the soil treatment applied to cropland and pastures is important. Of the 252 farms surveyed, 117 had received applications of some limestone, 11 had received some phosphate, and 8 some commercial fertilizers. Most soil treatment is applied to the cropland and so affects pastures only when they are rotated with cropland. The value of liming cropland is illustrated by results at the Toledo experiment field located in the light-gray prairie area (Table 12). x In this area, which constitutes about 30 percent of the county, at least 4 tons of limestone an acre are required to correct soil acidity. The appli- cation of limestone, which makes possible the growing of clovers in the rotation, has given marked results where used with either manure or crop residues. While a fairly large proportion of the farmers on the largest farms followed good management practices, this proportion diminished rap- idly as the farms became smaller. On the small farms, where the best practices are most needed, there was a dearth of good practices. The reason for this is easily understood: the better practices reflect a higher degree of managerial ability, and even those who know good practices are more likely to apply them when the enterprise is large enough to justify the effort; and money to finance such practices as the application of limestone is easier to get for larger farms. Differ- ences in the quality of the farming in the different soil-group areas can be shown by comparing the prevalence of certain good farming 'The large increases in productivity indicated by the data in Table 12 are obtained only by several years of soil-building. In fact, the data from the Toledo experiment field indicate that about ten years are required to build up yields to the present average on treated soils. 298 BULLETIN No. 506 [November, TABLE 13. — PERCENTAGE OF FARMERS IN THE DIFFERENT SOIL-GROUP AREAS USING THE CROP PRACTICES INDICATED, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, 1939* Hilly Light prairie Dark prairie River bottom MorainaJ Cropland in cultivated crops 36 54 57 53 52 Limestone applied to cropland 78 95 88 79 80 Permanent pastures manured 37 68 64 30 13 •Farm survey. practices (Table 13). More of the better crop practices were followed in the areas where the farms were larger. In a sample of 58 pastures representing 32 farms, 18 had been treated with lime or manure or both; none had received phosphate fertilizer ; none had been manured within the year previous to the sur- vey. The dominant species of plants in all pastures, both treated and untreated, were redtop and timothy.1 Twenty-nine percent of the treated pastureland and 41 percent of the untreated lacked vegetative cover. Treated pastures also had only half as much weed cover as untreated pastures and they had fewer unpalatable and less-nutritive TABLE 14. — CARRYING CAPACITY OF PASTURES MEASURED IN ANIMAL UNITS PER ACRE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, 1939a Treated pastures Untreated pastures Area Number of fields sampled Area sampled Average carrying capacity per acre Number of fields sampled Area sampled Average carrying capacity per acre Hilly .4 acres 34 80 230 150 494 animal units .64 .63 .69 .52 .63 7 9 14 10 40 acres 312 173 291 395 1 171 animal units .28 .35 .29 .40 .33 Light prairie 2 Dark prairie 4 Morainal 8 All areas 18 •Reported by R. F. Fueljeman, Department of Agronomy, Illinois Agricultural Experiment Sta- tion. No fields were sampled in the river-bottom area. annual grasses. The estimated average carrying capacity of treated pastures, measured in animal units, was approximately twice that of untreated pastures2 (Table 14). 'Some Kentucky bluegrass, Canada bluegrass, white clover, red clover, les- pedeza, and sweet clover were found. Untreated fields seldom contained Ken- tucky bluegrass or legumes, but considerable areas of Canada bluegrass were frequently encountered. 2A few woodland pastures were included in the untreated fields, but this would not change the ratio appreciably since all untreated pastures were poor. Woodland pastures were invariably poor and their carrying capacity small. 19441 FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY Livestock Numbers and Practices 299 The number of hogs per farm was greatest in the river-bottom, dark-gray prairie, and morainal areas, where corn production is largest (Table IS). On some of the larger farms both hogs and cattle were fed. In the hilly area the number of hogs appeared large in relation to grain production ; pigs were either sold as feeders or fed out, depend- ing on the available feed supply. The prairie areas raised more dairy TABLE 15. — AVERAGE NUMBERS OF LIVESTOCK PER FARM IN DIFFERENT SOIL- GROUP AREAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, 1939" Hilly Light prairie Dark prairie River bottom Morainal Horses and mules . 3.2 3.9 5.5 3.6 2.9 Milk cows 4.6 6.0 6.0 4.7 3.9 Other cattle 5.6 6.2 14.7 8.4 4.6 Brood sows 2.0 2.8 4.4 4.7 2.9 Other hogs 11.8 12.7 28.3 33.6 19.5 Sheep and lambs 4.1 2.2 4.1 .8 3.2 Hens 94 6 147 6 117.0 151 7 113.3 Other poultry raised 211.1 314.4 276.2 302.3 272.0 •Farm survey. cows than any other region because of available markets for whole milk and the large amounts of forage. Beef and dual-purpose cattle in limited numbers were widely distributed thruout the county since they are kept to utilize pasture on both tillable and untillable land. A few sheep were found in each area, but numbers were limited by poor drainage in pastures, lack of fences, and danger from dogs. Poultry was relatively important in all five areas. The light-gray prairie and river-bottom areas had the largest flocks of laying hens. TABLE 16. — PERCENTAGE OF FARMERS IN EACH SOIL-GROUP AREA USING PRACTICES INDICATED, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, 1939a Hilly Light prairie Dark prairie River bottom Morainal Dairy cattle Herds purebred or grade . 41 54 70 52 50 Purebred bulls used 26 47 50 37 28 Protein supplements fed 15 27 29 28 28 Grain for feeding ground 37 44 49 33 28 Silo used 2 11 17 5 2 Swine Purebred boar used 27 18 34 38 15 Spring pigs full-fed 41 62 78 76 66 Sanitation practices applied 35 38 68 44 27 Poultry Mash fed . 54 55 79 67 60 Mash fed all year , 15 38 36 44 31 •Farm survey. 300 BULLETIN No. 506 [November, Livestock of good quality is found on many farms in Cumberland county; but on many others income could be increased if a better quality of animals were kept and they were better managed. (Fig. 12) 1944} FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY 301 Livestock numbers were proportional to the amount of feed pro- duced since little feed was shipped either into or out of the county. The poor quality of the animals in the hilly area reflected the small amount of grain raised. Livestock practices followed the same pattern as crop practices: the better methods were used most extensively on the larger farms and least on the small farms. There were marked differences, also, between the soil-group areas: farmers in the hilly areas, where farms are small and poor, made the least use of improved livestock practices (Table 16). > Tenure and Ages of Operators Of the farms included in the survey, 42 percent were operated by full owners, 32 percent by part owners, and 26 percent by tenants. Altho the proportions varied in different parts of the county, in each of the five areas full owners were most numerous, part owners second, and tenants fewest except in the Embarrass river bottom, where part owners and tenants were equal in number. The proportion of owners was largest on the small farms ; and part owners and tenants were most numerous on the larger farms. The land operated by owners and part of that operated by tenants represented entire farm units; part owners and tenants often rented individual fields for a year at a time. Where such fields are rented there is little inclination to follow a regular cropping system, and the crops are usually of the sort which are entirely removed from the land; hence soil depletion is more likely to occur on these fields than on owner-operated farms. Types of leases had no apparent relation to the soil-group areas. For the county as a whole, leases based on a division of the crop pre- dominated ; in 62 percent of all the leases a part of the crop represented the entire payment, and in 18 percent a cash payment was made for hay or pasture land in addition to a part of the crops for tilled land. The usual crop rental is two-thirds to the tenant and one-third to the landowner. Cash leases made up 17 percent of all leases and livestock share leases 3 percent. An operator sometimes rented land under more than one type of lease. Seventy-nine percent of the leases were oral; this high proportion doubtless rises from long tenure1 and the fact that one-third of those renting land were related to the owner. 'Full owners averaged 22.7 years on the present farm ; part owners, 19.1 years; and tenants, 7.3 years. 302 BULLETIN No. 506 {.November, TABLE 17. — PERCENTAGE OF FARM OPERATORS IN SPECIFIED AGE-GROUPS IN THE DIFFERENT SOIL-GROUP AREAS OF CUMBERLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, 1939" Age of operator Hilly Light prairie Dark prairie River bottom Morainal years 20-39 20 . 4 19.7 45.8 32.5 16.3 40-59 55.1 50.0 39.6 48.9 53.0 60 and over 24.5 30.3 14.6 18.6 30.7 Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 •Farm survey. The ages of the operators varied significantly in the different soil- group areas (Table 17). In the dark-gray prairie and river-bottom areas there were higher proportions of operators under 40 and lower proportions 60 or over than in the other areas. The morainal area had the smallest proportion of operators under 40 and the largest propor- tion 60 or over; the light-gray prairie area ranked next in each instance. Obviously younger men have taken up farming in areas where opportunities are greatest. ( \ Incomes From Farming Farming opportunities on such small farms as those in the hilly area are of course extremely limited. In fact nearly all farms with a small crop acreage in the county are seriously handicapped. (The river- bottom farms are an exception ; they are fertile enough to provide good incomes even when crop areas are not large.) Much of the land not in harvested crops contributes little to the farm income. Hence, in group- ing the farms by size, the number of acres in crops rather than the total area has been used. Thus differences in income which are directly due to differences in soil are clearly shown. The farm incomes (from sale of farm products plus government payments) in the various areas reflect natural conditions, size of crop area, and quality of farming, which in turn is directly related to size of crop area (Table 18).1 In the light-gray prairie and hilly areas, which together make up two-thirds of the county, the average gross incomes from farms with 120 acres or more in crops were approximately $2,000 and $2,500 respectively; the incomes from farms with 80 to 119 acres in crops 'Inasmuch as no data were secured on operating expenses, no net-income figures are available. More detailed data classified by sources of income are given in Table 19, page 304. 1944~\ FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY 303 were $1,250 and $1,600; from farms with 40 to 79 acres, $600 and $900; and from farms with less than 40 acres the incomes were ap- proximately $460 and $525 respectively. The light-gray prairie area had the advantage over the hilly area in that two-thirds of its farms had 80 acres or more in crops, whereas four-fifths of the farms in the hilly area had less than 80 acres in crops. In the dark-gray prairie and morainal areas gross incomes were similar to those in the light-gray prairie and hilly areas except that on TABLE 18, — GROSS INCOME PER FARM IN THE DIFFERENT SOIL-GROUP AREAS AND SIZE OF CROP AREA, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, 1938" Crop acres Hilly Light-gray prairie Dark-gray prairie River bottom Morainal in farm Nbr *•«»« Nbuer "— N-- income NbT *«»» e N™- Income 120 and over 80-119 4 $2 475 5 1 253 18 $2 014 17 1 568 18 $3 479 16 1 419 20 $3 742 7 2 371 10 $4 393 6 1 464 40-79 16 869 12 621 9 706 10 1 581 12 805 Under 40 23 521 7 463 3 405 7 298 19 609 •Farm survey. Figures are sales and government payments from June, 1938, to June, 1939, less purchase price of livestock bought and direct cash outlay incurred in harvesting and marketing broom- corn. Operators of 13 farms had moved to them in the spring of 1939; since they had not had a full year on the farm, income figures were not used. More detailed figures on income are shown in Table 19, page 304. the largest farms incomes were materially higher. Because of their more productive soil, all the river-bottom farms except the smallest had relatively favorable gross incomes. More than four-fifths of these farms brought their operators incomes of more than $1,200, whereas only one-fifth of the farms in the hilly area produced incomes that high. The few farms with the smallest acreage in crops had the lowest average income of any in the county; they were located on the bluffs adjacent to the river bottom. In appraising these income data, attention needs to be given to the different proportions of various-sized farms in the five areas and to the conditions at the time of the survey.1 The very favorable crop yields both in 1937 and 1938 resulted in bigger feed supplies than usual and in expanded sales of both crops and livestock. In all these areas the relation between number of acres in crops and gross income per farm is clearly shown ; yet size of crop area is not the only factor affecting these incomes. Altho it is true that the larger farms afford greater opportunities; it is also true that they attract a 'See page 279. • 304 BULLETIN No. 506 [November, higher quality of farming. As the crop area becomes smaller, the quality of farming becomes progressively poorer, and the income suf- fers from both these factors. The problem works in a circle, for the very limited incomes on the small farms are responsible, in part at least, for the deterioration in equipment on these farms, failure of the operators to adopt better farming practices, and the generally lower standard of living. A large proportion of the farms in Cumberland county can be made to yield better incomes if a way can be found to induce and to make it practicable for their operators to adopt more efficient and economical methods of production. TABLE 19. — CASH SALES AND GROSS INCOME PER FARM FROM DIFFERENT SIZES OF FARMS IN THE DIFFERENT SOIL-GROUP AREAS, CUMBERLAND COUNTY, ILLINOIS, 1938s Crop acres in farm 120 and over 80-119 40-79 Under 40 120 and over 80-119 40-79 Under 40 Dark-gray prairie Light-gray prairie Number of records .... All livestock Livestock products .... Crops Government payments. Total cash sales Purchases'" Gross income 18 16 9 3 $2 565 $ 854 $ 378 £353 540 300 277 40 1 112 555 277 126 124 71 42 4 34 341 $1 780 $ 974 $523 862 361 268 118 $3 479 $1 419 $ 706 3405 ' 18 17 12 7 $ 939 $ 629 3261 $213 502 610 185 226 604 450 292 38 96 22 21 27 32 141 $1 711 £759 3504 127 143 138 41 $2 014 $1 568 3621 3463 Hilly Morainal Number of records .... All livestock Livestock products .... Crops Government payments. Total cash sales Purchases'" Gross income 4 5 16 23 $ 477 $ 622 $ 559 3345 722 217 236 148 1 490 604 189 66 98 49 35 34 $2 787 $1 492 $1 019 3593 312 239 150 72 $2 475 $1 253 $ 869 3521 10 6 12 19 $4 953 $ 572 3380 3414 275 92 186 115 1 144 885 343 91 228 35 1 10 $6 600 31 584 3910 3630 2 207 120 105 21 34 393 31 464 3805 3609 River-bottom Number of records 20 7 10 7 All livestock 31 969 31 811 3 832 3 89 Livestock products 456 280 643 59 Crops 1 673 649 315 204 . Government payments. . 86 3 42 Total cash sales 34 184 32 743 31 832 3352 Purchases'" 442 372 251 54 Gross income 33 742 32 371 31 581 3298 •Farm survey. Sales and government payments are from June, 1938, to June, 1939. The num- bers of records differ slightly from those given earlier because the records of farms which had been under the present operator for less than a full year are omitted. •"Purchases include livestock bought and direct cash outlays in harvesting and marketing broom- corn. The latter outlays were calculated at 350 a ton of broom fiber sold; this figure was based on rates paid in 1938 and on the quantities of labor indicated in an unpublished master's thesis ("An Economic Study of Broomcorn Production in Illinois," by C. D. Palmer, University of Illinois, 1928) as having been used in the production of this crop. 1944] FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY LEVEL OF LIVING 305 The small incomes obtained from many farms in the hilly area, and indeed on farms of limited crop area thruout the county, naturally depress the living conditions of the families on these farms. More of the houses and other buildings and fences are in poor condition than in the county as a whole. Machinery on the smaller farms is often inade- quate. On many of the farms with less than 80 acres in crops, condi- tions do not justify the use of mechanized equipment. The trend toward mechanization is indicated by the fact that 86 percent of the farms with 120 acres or more in crops had tractors. At the time of this survey electricity was available to only 9 percent of the farms, but lines under construction were expected to bring it within reach of about 20 percent. Such home improvements as running water were most common on the farms with the larger crop acreages. Families on the larger farms reported the preservation of more food, the possession of a wider variety of reading materials, and the purchase of larger amounts of life insurance than those on the smaller farms. The differences in the productivity of the five soil-group areas in Cumberland county doubtless account for the differences in the pro- portion of young people 16 to 24 years old who have left these areas. In the hilly area 43 percent of this group had left home when this sur- vey was made, while in the dark-gray prairie area and in the river- bottom area only 21 and 23 percent respectively had gone. In all three In the more fertile areas of Cumberland county are many productive farms with good buildings. This farmstead has another fairly new barn which is obscured by the one in the foreground. (Pig- 13) 306 BULLETIN No. 506 {November, Farmsteads in the light-gray prairie areas are usually well kept. Farm in- come is substantially increased by liming the soil and using the better farm practices. (Fig. 14) areas a considerable number of those still at home were employed away from the farm. It is of course to be expected that those areas which offer the least economic opportunity will lose the largest share of their young people. When a large proportion of the young people migrate from such areas and the older people remain on the land, deterioration of community life and activities inevitably follows. Lack of opportunity to acquire an adequate income from farming or from other occupations is shown in the number and location of public-assistance cases in Cumberland county. In 1938 there were 977 Farmsteads in the hilly areas generally reflect the unproductive character of the soil. The buildings are usually located on the flat upland which is in- terspersed thruout these areas. (Fig. 15) 1944} FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY 307 « •= • s * S •-'E *2 ^ U "c " «*£ 5 rt i- rt ^ rt »'«•- _- a1 -a « "> c c e « " C rt rt O rt 3 O O C/3 J u i_ >» - rt ?• IJ-fi ° — •£ w — ^ •- i-i rt be M^ 8iia C rt rt 5 £^ « CO rt. W ) -1 +7 +11 -44 Soybeans for beans +35 +214 +225 +527 All soybeans +4 +35 +45 +99 -19 Total cropland in intertilled crops +4 +15 +17 +30 -36 Wheat - -6 -33 -30 -1 -5 Oats +10 +40 +40 -1 +67 Plowable pasture +8 -17 -13 -26 +11 Total hay and plowable pasture. . +5 +1 +3 —15 +25 Livestock and livestock products All cattle (January 1) +6 +15 +20 +12 («) Milk cows (January 1) -1 -1 +1 +4 Hogs (January 1) +20 +48 +74 +53 Sows to farrow 0>) +15 +34 +23 Sheep +10 +37 +28 +10 Milk (b) +1 +2 +5 Eggs -1 +14 +29 +38 Cumberland county Crops Corn +1 +7 0>) («) -44 Soybeans for beans +41 +290 +265 All soybeans +8 +43 +34 -19 Total cropland in intertilled crops +3 +20 +13 —36 Wheat -7 -50 -1 -5 Oats +4 +39 +1 +66 Plowable pasture -14 -27 -13 +12 Total hay and plowable pasture... +4 —15 —4 +41 Livestock and livestock products All cattle (January 1) +9 +19 +19 Milk cows (January 1) +6 +12 +12 Hogs (January 1) +30 +81 +86 Sows to farrow +9 +43 (c) Sheep +20 +31 +33 Milk (b) +18 +18 Eggs -1 +14 +20 •Area 7 figures were compiled from data in a mimeographed publication, "Wartime Farm Pro- duction Adjustments in Illinois," 1942, and "An Appraisal of Maximum Wartime Production Capacity in Illinois," 1943, compiled cooperatively by the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Cumberland county data are from unpublished materials from same sources as the above reports. bLess than .5 percent change. "Data not available. On the basis of the calculations made by this committee a still further shift in Cumberland county from hay and plowable pasture to intertilled crops would be desirable under emergency war conditions. This shift would be similar to that already made but would include further expansion in acreage of soybeans, especially where the crop is to be harvested as beans, and some increase in corn. Under such a plan wheat and oats would approximate the 1939 acreages. Even for wartime maximum production, the numbers of meat animals have already been too greatly expanded, and decreases are therefore indicated for all cattle, hogs, and sheep. A moderate in- 312 BULLETIN No. 506 [November, crease in milk cows and milk production, as well as a further increase in chickens and eggs, is desirable. These recommendations are based on the fact that Cumberland county is short in feed production and cannot support so much livestock unless farmers ship in feed. Long-Time Desirable Production Goals representing an ideal long-time use of land resources were also set up by the above committee. In these goals are included the development of operating units large enough to be profitable and the adoption of systems of farming suited to the character of the land. The shifts that have taken place under the emergency conditions of the war have been largely in the opposite direction to those designed to give the best long-time use of the land. The long-time adjustments that are now needed are therefore much more drastic than were needed in 1939, when the field work of this study was completed. The extreme reductions indicated for corn and soybeans and the increases recom- mended in small grains, hay, and plowable pasture (Table 22) show the extent to which the land resources of this county have long been misused and how misuse has increased under war conditions. The need for adopting recommended changes is more urgent than ever. RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUMMARY The foregoing analysis of Cumberland county farms shows what wide differences there are in the natural conditions under which farm- ers in this county try to make a living for their families and in the soil, crop, and livestock practices followed by individual farmers. All these differences find ultimate expression in the incomes derived from these farms and in the level of living enjoyed by those who are dependent on these incomes. On the basis of their productive capacity, the farms of the county may be divided into three groups: 1. Those that now provide an adequate income but whose pro- duction could be increased by better management. About half the farms are in this class. 2. Those which, because of their small size or low productivity, now fail to support a family but could be made to do so if the soil were better managed and better methods of crop and livestock produc- tion used. About one-fourth of the farms are in this class. 3. Those that are so small or so unproductive that they never 1944] FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY 313 could be made to yield a satisfactory living for a family. About one- fourth of the farms are in this class. For the problems associated with this last group of farms there are two possible solutions: (1) their absorption into larger adjacent farms or the consolidation of two or more of them; (2) acquirement by their operators of outside employment, the income from which would supplement that derived from the farm. Present opportunities for outside employment, however, are so limited that they could not be made to care for any large proportion of these cases. Better farming practices. That there is little opportunity for operators of the poorer farms to shift to better locations in the county is shown by the fact that 75 percent of the farm land lies in the three poorest soil-group areas of the county and 85 percent has a productive rating of 7 or lower. Thruout the county, therefore, there is urgent need for farmers to improve their soil and adopt better farming practices, and many must find a way to acquire larger farms if they are to earn enough to sup- port their families without public aid. It is clear that improvement of the soil should have first attention. This means providing good drain- age, controlling erosion, building up soil fertility, developing cropping systems suited to soil conditions, and adopting more widely the best soil-management practices. Recommendations for good soil manage- ment will be found, type by type, in the Cumberland County Soil Report,1 and only general recommendations will therefore be given here. Shifting extensive acreages of land of low productivity from inter- tilled crops to small grains, hay, and pasture, to which they are better suited, would greatly improve the economy of the area. It will of course take time to make some of these shifts, to apply soil treatment, to develop suitable types of livestock, and to initiate desirable manage- ment practices ; and while the results of some improved practices will be quickly apparent, full benefits from many others, such as the use of limestone, will not be realized for several years. Moreover some cash outlay is necessary for the initiation of most improved practices. Increases in the net income may therefore be small during the first years of an improvement program, but over a period of years they should increase cumulatively and make possible further improvements both in farm practices and in living conditions for the family. It would seem that farmers in Cumberland county can make their best contribution to the war effort by using this period to start general 'University of Illinois, Agricultural Experiment Station, 1940. 314 BULLETIN No. 506 [November, adjustments that have long been needed. Any surplus income during the war period should be used to pay debts, to lime the land, to pur- chase more land where necessary, and to work toward a more general livestock-and-small-grain type of farming. Greater use of limestone. With the exception of the bottomland soils, most of which are subject to overflow, and a few scattered tracts of clay loam in the upland, all the soils in the county are acid and need limestone to prepare the way for a soil-improvement program. Some are in greater need of this material than others. In the hilly areas the soils are strongly acid except for the numerous small tracts of bottomland and the rough, broken land. The light-gray prairie area is, in general, the most strongly acid of all areas. The major soils in both the dark-gray prairie and the morainal areas are medium acid. In the river-bottom area the major soil type (Huntsville loam) is neutral to slightly acid. The broken part of the area is similar in acidity to the hilly area. Since limestone is basic to a program of soil improvement and con- servation, its availability, cost, and method of financing are important considerations. While liming of soils is increasing at a rapid rate in Cumberland county, applications have not been large enough or exten- sive enough to replace the amounts of calcium being lost thru plant use and leaching. More effective methods need to be devised to induce farmers to use it and use more of it. The main problem restricting the use of limestone has been its cost. Before the war, when trucking facilities were adequate, limestone was being delivered to the farms for about $2 a ton,1 a very reasonable rate. Nevertheless a large number of owners and operators could neither pay cash for it nor get long enough credit to enable them to pay for it out of the crop increases that would result from its use. Crop yields ordinarily do not increase until the third year after the limestone is applied. Some arrangement is therefore needed whereby purchasers will be permitted to defer payment for the limestone until the in- creased income is realized. The grant-of-aid plan of the AAA has been a partial solution to the limestone problem. It has permitted as much as 70 percent of the total AAA payment to be assigned for limestone. This is a slow method of getting limestone used in a region of so many small farms since AAA payments per farm are very small. Many farmers have expressed "Limestone delivered at this cost was from quarries in adjoining counties. There are no quarries operating in Cumberland county. 1944] FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY 315 approval of a plan whereby they could receive all their AAA payment in limestone or other soil-improving materials rather than in cash. However, the grant-of-aid plan has, up to this time, fitted into the usual practice in the claypan region of liming only small acreages at a time.1 Loans for as long as three years can be obtained from production credit associations. Parts of these loans are often used for liming, altho the association does not usually make small loans just for liming. Since the security required consists of chattels valued at twice the amount of the loan, and since the returns' from liming cannot always be realized within three years, these loans are not well-suited to the needs of the area. The agency best fitted to solve this problem is probably the Farm Security Administration since it can make loans for periods as long as five years to farm owners who do not have enough security to get credit from other acceptable sources. Loans can be made to tenants who have long-term leases if these leases provide compensation for unexhausted improvements or if the landlord is willing to reduce rental payments for a period of years, the difference in rent to apply to the cost of liming. A highly desirable arrangement would be for farm-mortgage agen- cies to encourage their clients to apply limestone and, if necessary, lend them enough money to pay the costs. The additional security pro- vided by the greater productivity of the land would justify this prac- tice, which the Farm Security Administration follows on its tenant- purchase farms in the county. Revision of cropping systems. The cropping systems used on the harvested crop acreage in Cumberland county are generally too deplet- ing. In all areas corn and broomcorn occupy too much cropland. The combination of corn, broomcorn, and soybeans, used on 59 to 100 per- cent of the crop area of individual farms in an effort to produce the greatest volume of cash and feed crops creates serious problems of soil depletion and erosion. The fairly large acreage* in nonlegume hays indicates how little of the cropland has been limed. The more general use of limestone would permit cropping systems that would keep more fertility in the soils and reduce erosion. In the county as a whole this would lead to the more 'The AAA grant-of-aid plan has been considered highly successful in stimu- lating the use of limestone. The plan was put into operation in 1940. In 1940 and 1941 the farmers of Cumberland county requested a total of 26,924 tons of limestone under this method of financing. 316 BULLETIN No. 506 [November, extensive planting of legumes and small grains and some reduction in timothy and redtop hay, soybeans, and corn. Of course such a program would take several years to accomplish, and it would mean a smaller income from grain than is realized under the present system (except as higher grain yields might offset reduction in acreage) ; but it would increase the amount of feed crops, help maintain fertility, and reduce erosion. Some of the cropland that is now least productive or most subject to erosion could be used more advantageously for pasture than for harvested crops ; but even for this purpose such lands should come under an improvement program. Pasture improvement. Pasturing of some of the timbered areas in Cumberland county should be discontinued. An improvement pro- gram for pastures that are to be continued should include soil treat- ment and the control of grazing and weeds. Tho it is commonly thought that land worn out from grain growing will be all right for pasture, pasture grasses, like ordinary crops, are affected by the fertility of the soil. Improvement of pastures will increase their livestock-carrying capacity and provide a better quality of feed. When included as part of the regular rotation, pastures should be given the same treatment as the rest of the crop area. For permanent pastures on tillable land, the first requirement is limestone to correct acidity. Pasture-improvement tests in the claypan region1 show that a mixture of sweet clover, lespedeza, timothy, and redtop gives best results. The application of manure or other fertilizers is also beneficial. Control of grazing is important because it reduces the number of weeds. On rolling land it also helps prevent erosion, since a good cover of pasture grasses means less surface runoff. Clipping of weeds is another practice which increases the carrying capacity of pastures. Better woodland management. The outstanding need of farm woodlands is protection from grazing and fire. In the hilly area and in broken parts or the river-bottom area, there are large acreages of brush and timberland that are pastured. In fact two-thirds of the woodland in the entire county was reported in the 1935 U. S. Census as pastured. Heavily shaded pastures produce a scant growth of grasses and the grasses are of poor quality. Moreover, pasturing of woodland destroys young trees, reduces their rate of growth and the JA "test-farm demonstration project," on the use of phosphate on pastures is underway in Shelby county. Some farmers claim that the carrying capacity of their pastures is five times what it was. The results of this project are easily observed by Cumberland county farmers. 1944~\ FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY 317 proportion of desirable species, and increases erosion. Such land would be more profitable if used exclusively for timber production. The woodland of the county is confined almost entirely to the hilly and river-bottom areas. Since there are no blocks large enough to justify public operation, these wooded tracts should be included in farms and managed as a part of the farm business. In all the broken areas more care and attention to woodlands would add to their value as income-producing enterprises, altho a period of time is necessary before returns would be secured. Where erosion and gullying are taking place, trees should be' planted or allowed to seed naturally. Where stands are already established, most of the timber is thrifty and growing rapidly in size and value ; it should not be cut until the maximum return can be obtained in timber for farm needs and for market. Larger farming units. Possibly three-fourths of the farms in Cumberland county could, thru the adoption of the practices recom- mended here, be made to provide a reasonable living for the farm family. Many farms, however, have too small a productive area to maintain a family adequately no matter what improvements their operators might make in farming practices. The most drastic adjustments in size are needed on the smallest farms. Since a large proportion of the operators on the smaller farms are 60 years old or older (in 1939 39 percent were over 60, 22 percent were over 70), changes in operators may take place rather rapidly over the next ten years, leading to a combining of many farms. The poor condition of more than one-third of the houses on the small farms is another factor that may lead to a combining of some of these farms. That such a trend toward larger farms has long been underway is indi- cated by the decrease in the number of farms in the county from 2,484 in 1900 to 1,779 in 1940, a drop of 28 percent, whereas the total area in farms has not changed. The final remedy for the existence of farms too small or too un- productive to be made economic must lie in a reduction of the rural population and the relocation in industrial areas or in other agricul- tural areas of the families now living on these farms. Livestock adjustments. The amount of livestock which the farm- ers in this county can profitably keep depends, of course, for one thing on the amount of feed they can grow or buy. Many of them need to adjust their types of livestock to their equipment, labor supply, market, and the feeds they grow, or should grow, on their own farms. This 318 BULLETIN No. 506 [November, would mean more dairy and beef cattle and fewer hogs in the morainal area; more beef-breeding herds and sheep in the rough areas; more hogs in the river area, where there is a large surplus of corn for feed; and more dairy cattle in the eastern part of the county, where legume pastures can be grown on the prairie lands. More poultry would be profitable on farms where suitable housing can be provided and where feed and labor are available. By intensifying his livestock production in this way, a farmer could increase the volume of his farm business without having to acquire a larger acreage. Possibly even more important than the adjustment of the kinds and number of livestock is the improvement of its quality. On many farms larger production and a better income could be realized from the same number of animals and the same amount of feed if better breeding were practiced, balanced rations were fed, and better care were given. On many farms the breeds of livestock might profitably be changed, as where beef breeds are now used for dairy purposes. Returns would be materially increased if dairy breeds were kept on farms where milk is the principal source of income and beef breeds on those where sale of calves or fat cattle is the primary aim. On farms where some dairy products are sold and the calves are raised for feeding, dual-purpose cattle may be best. For any type of cattle the use of high-quality bulls, preferably of the same breed as the cows, is desirable. Only the best animals should be kept for breeding purposes. With improvement of crop and pasture lands, more beef-breeding herds would be justified on the larger farms in the hilly area. Such herds should be built up gradually, the foundation stock being secured when cattle prices are low. More efficient dairy production can be developed by feeding rations that are properly balanced with protein supplements, by grinding the grains, by testing to keep the herds free from disease, and by keeping records of the milk and butter fat production of individual cows in order to identify and cull out the low producers. Swine production can be made more profitable by the more wide- spread use of sanitary measures for the control of parasites and diseases and by vaccinating against hog cholera. Feeding practices can be improved by using legumes for forage, purchasing protein supple- ments to balance grain feeds, and feeding hogs rapidly to market weights when feeds are available. In some parts of the county farmers sell feeder pigs when their feed supplies are short and feed out pigs when supplies are plentiful. Larger numbers of sheep could well be kept to utilize roughage, 1944] FARMING IN CUMBERLAND COUNTY 319 particularly in the hilly and morainal areas, where drainage is not a serious problem. Dogs may possibly be the limiting factor in sheep production. On the smaller farms it seems advisable to continue to use horses rather than tractors, as the amount of work to be done does not justify a large investment in power equipment and the small income does not permit heavy expenditures for fuel, upkeep, and replacement. On the larger farms the choice of power and equipment may be guided by individual preference after due consideration has been given to the kinds and acreages of crops grown ; but care needs to be taken to limit the total power supply to the needs of the farm. Too often tractors are added without reducing the number of horses. Poultry can be made to contribute more income to these Cumber- land county farms than it is now contributing. While the quality of the poultry stock and the character of the housing are generally good, on many farms the housing is entirely inadequate for the number of hens kept ; this results in low production and high losses. Feeding practices could be improved by the more general use of balanced rations, both in mash form and in regular feeds. Use of more green legumes and the rotation of feeding lots is needed. After improvements are made in housing and feeding, the laying flock could be increased on many farms to make use of available labor. Improvement of living conditions. Even where little or no cash is available, numerous improvements in a farm family's scale of living can often be made thru better planning and effort by the family itself. Indeed the home production of a varied and adequate food supply is likely to mean not only a more healthful diet but less expense as well.1 An ample garden and dairy and poultry products and at least a part of the meat supply can be produced at home with little cash outlay. Much can be done in Cumberland county and the claypan region to improve family living in this way. An increase in income from the products raised and sold is, however, an essential step in raising the living here to a reasonable level. This holds true not only for the present farm operators, but also for the younger people who will gradually replace the present operators. While the war period, because of the higher prices it has brought for farm products, might be ex- 'The gardens in the light-gray prairie and hilly areas of Cumberland county are considerably better than those in other areas of the county. In all areas the quantities of vegetables canned at the time this study was made was definitely related to the size of the farm, the larger quantities being canned on the larger farms. 320 BULLETIN No. 506 pected to provide a start toward the establishment of those basic im- provements that would permanently raise the income level, in reality it has retarded them, for under the incentive of wartime prices farmers have expanded the use of practices that are largely opposed to those that are desirable from a long-time point of view. To the period fol- lowing the war, therefore, must be left the more fundamental adjust- ments that are needed to put farming in this area on a basis where it will provide a reasonable standard of living for those who choose this way of life. 6050—11-44—28450 SERS.TYOFILLINUIS-URBANA