—— - ¥ * 5 ~ 5 7 ie — a 4 1 ! = ¥ - ry = ; a << eae i : : = | = — a = } ; -? Vi 5 : es ) = = iT i ¢ a i = ’ , , a 2 a a . ; = 1 oO: & o ve ms WC CTS LABORATORY BEGINS HERE = EST PRODI OR LD OF THE F< Tf THE F N UTILIZATIO The Forest Products Laboratory A Decennial Record 1910 -- 1920 THE FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY AN INSTITUTION OF INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH MAINTAINED AT MADISON, WISCONSIN IN QUARTERS FURNISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN BY THE BRANCH OF RESEARCH FOREST SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE PUBLISHED BY THE DECENNIAL COMMITTEE HOWARD F. WEISS, Chairman 1921 LIBRARY OF CONGRESS RECEIVED JUL 201922 DOCUMENTS RIVISION DEMOCRAT PRINTING COMPANY MADISON, WISCONSIN JO? tafe GENERAL COMMITTEE Decennial Celebration PORES? PRODUCTS LABORATORY MADISON, WISCONSIN JOEY 22 AND 23; 1920 Honorary Chairman, EMANUEL L. PHILIPP, Governor, Commonwealth of Wisconsin. Chairman, Howarp F. WEISS, ony TEN Burgess Laboratories, Madison, Wis. Ex-Director, Forest Products Lab- oratory. First Vice-Chairman, CaRLILE P. WINSLOW, Director, Forest Products Laboratory. Second Vice-Chairman, H. J. THORKELSON, Business Manager, Uni- versity of Wisconsin. Executive Secretary, Don BK. Mowry, General Secretary, Madison Association of Commerce. R. H. AtsHtTon, President, American R. R. Assn., Chicago, Ill. W. R. ANDERSON, Publisher, “Packages,” Milwaukee, Wis. JAMES R. ANGELL, Chairman, National Research Council, Washington, D. C. E. A. Biree, President, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis. J. H. Buorpen, President, Bloedel-Donovan Lumber Mills, Seattle, Wash. Vice Pres. Nat’l Lumber Mfgrs. Ass’n. C. S. BRANTINGHAM, President, Emerson—Brantingham Co., Rockford, Il. Chairman, Advisory Committee, National Implement & Vehicle Association. R. C. BRYANT, Yale Forest School, New Haven, Conn. Pres. Society of American Foresters. C. B. CHAPMAN, President, Madison Association of Commerce. Gro. M. Cornwatu, Editor and Publisher. “The Timberman,”’ Portland, Ore. Jos. H. Drrrrrs, Defrees, Buckingham & Eaton, Attorneys, Chicago, Ill. ee orn Chamber of Commerce of U. M. C. FirzceraLtp. Director of Transporta- tion, General Electric Co., Schenectady, N. Y. A. L. Forp, Managing Editor, “American Lumberman,” Chicago, Ill. L. D. Garpner, President, The Gardner— Moffat Co., Ine. New York, N. Y. W. A. GILCHRIST, Chicago, Ill. Chairman, Committee on Wood Utilization and Prevention of Waste. National Lum- ber Manufacturers’ Association. JOHN M. GLENN, President, Glenn & Co., Chicago, Ill. Secretary, Illinois Mfgrs. Association. R. B. GoopMan, Secretary, Sawyer Goodman Lumber Co., Marinette, Wis. Director, Nat’l Lumber Mfegrs. Ass'n. HENRY S. GRAVES, Washington, D. C. Former Forester, U. S. Forest Service. W. K. Harr, Purdue Univ., Lafayette, Ind. President Concrete Institute. CuHas. H. Herty, Editor, “Jour. Ind. and Eng. Chem.,”’ New York, N. Y. Howarp W. Hoss, Wood Mosaie Co., Ine., Louisville, Ky. WILLARD C. Howk8, President and Treasurer, Journal of Commerce Co., St. Louis, Mo. B. EE. HuntTLEY, President, B. EF. Huntley Furniture Co. Winston-Salem, N. C. Chairman, Forest Products Laboratory Committee, So. Furn. Mfgrs. Ass'n. Louis T. JAMME, Chicago, Ill. Ex-V. P. and Chairman Civic-Ind. Com., Chicago Association of Commerce. ELMER C. JENSEN, ’ Mundie & Jensen, Architects, Chicago, Ill. BoLLtiIne ARTHUR JOHNSON, Editor and Pub., “Lumber World Review,” Chicago, Tl. A. R. Joyce, First Vice-President, Joyee Watkins Co., Chicago, Ill. Pres., American Wood Preservers Ass’n. Cc. F. KesrTERING, Dayton-Wright Branch, General Motors, Dayton, Ohio JAMES S. Macerecor, United Aircraft Engi- neering Corporation, New York, N. Y. B. F. MAsterRS, V. P. &€ Gen. Man., Rathborne Hair & Ridgeway Company, Chicago, Il. Chairman of Bd. Nat’] Ass’n Box Mfgrs. Harry H. Merrick, President, ; Great Lakes Trust Co., Chicago, Il. President, Mississippi Valley Association. Geo. W. MixterR, Vice-President, E Pierce-Arrow Motor Car Co., Buffalo, N. Y. KE. R. Moaxk, Managing Editor, ; ; “Wisconsin State Journal,’ Madison, Wis. L. D. Post. Publisher, “Paper Mill & Pulp Wood News,” r New York, N. Y. PeERCIVAL SHELDON RIDSDALE, Editor, “American Forestry,” Washington, D. C. F. J. SENSENBRENNER, First Vice-Pres., Kim- berly-Clark Company, Neenah, Wis. E. B. STEVENS, President, is Wood Products Co., Buffalo, N. Y. W. H. SULLIVAN, Vice-Pres. € Gen. Man., Great Southern Lumber Co., Bogalusa, La. Director, Nat’l Lumber Mfg. Ass’n. Davin E. Town, General Manager, : = “Chicago Evening Post’? and associated papers, Chicago, Ill. R. F. WInNbDoES, Editor, “Wurniture Manufacturer and Artisan, Grand Rapids, Mich. C.-H. WorcrEsTER, President, C. H. Worcester Company, Chicago, Ill. Vice-Pres., Nat’l Lumber Mfgrs. Ags’n. CONTENTS Foreword Part I CHAPTER PAGE I Wood and Human Progress. : : : ll II Early Perspectives of For est Waavation ee III The Forest Products Laboratory. : : : eS) Establishment . ‘ : : : : ae) Growth _. ; : ; : : : ; = RO Organization. : : = 2 Equipment : . 16 Personnel : : ; . 19 IV Ten Years of Research in F ares Paaducts ; : Ee Pre-war Research . : ; : : ; S23 War Work ; : ; : : aoe V Financial Value of Research ee ; ; : . 359 VI Future Research in Forest Products : ; : ~ 268 VII Howto Usethe Laboratory . : : ; A 5) Para it Decennial Foreword : P ; ; s : poo Decennial Celebration Program ; : 5 3 Decennial Celebration Proceedings General Assembly, July 22,1920. : - 8a H. F.. Weiss, Chairman Banquet, July 22,1920 . : + 119 Burr W. Jones, LL. D., Toastmaster General Assembly, July 23, 1920. : : 7 139 John Foley, Chairman APPENDIX Decennial Registration List. ; ; ; ae Former Laboratory Staff Members : : . 189 LACS ATION S PAGE Utilization—The Field of the Forest Products Laboratory Begins Here : : : . Frontispiece Three Foresters, United States Forest Service The Yard to Which Come Logs from Many Climes and Coun- tries Organization Chart, Forest Products Laboratory ; Erection of the Million Pound Timber Testing Machine (1920) . Three Directors, Forest Products Laboratory The Timber Mechanics Laboratory Box ‘Testing in the Big Tumbling Drum A Charge of Ties Entering the Preservation Cylinder at the Lab- oratory War Work—An ae ae Wing Rib Being Placed in a Testing Machine : Personnel Development Chart—July, 1917 to July, 1920 Laminated Construction as Applied to Wooden Articles of Com- merce Glue Spreading Machine Some War Time Installations of Types of Dry Kilns Developed at the Laboratory : Wood Distillation Retort Studying the Many Factors Entering into the Manufacture and Storage of Airplane Propellers Forest Service Improvements in Turpentining Wood Technology—The Microscope is Useful in Identification . 3 T2 ILEWSTRALTLONS PAGE The Control and Operation End of a Dry Kiln at the Laboratory 76 Cooperative Box Work—A Study of Diagonal Compression 79 A Quiet Moment During the Decennial 84 Educational Work—A ‘Typical Class in Kiln Drying 100 Timber Tests—A Large Built-up Floor Beam Being ‘Tested to Destruction : ; . : : elite New Boxes for Old—Some War Time Box Work at the Lab- oratory 118 Notable Decennial Figures—Director €. P. Winslow, Forester W. B. Greeley, Former Director H. F. Weiss 122 Bending Heavy Wheel Rims 134 Moisture Resistant Coatings-—-Applyving Aluminum Leaf to Wheel Pattern 138 The Paper Making Machine 142 A Corner of the Pulp and Paper Laboratory 148 Notable Decennial Figures—Speakers and Leaders 156 Laboratory Helpers Gathering Data for Determining Moisture Content of Woods 162 A Miracle of Chemistry—Conversion of Sawdust into Stock Food 170 FOREWORD On July twenty-second, nineteen twenty, several hundred representatives of America’s diversified wood- using industries assembled at Madison, Wisconsin, to celebrate the tenth anniversary of the founding of the Forest Products Laboratory. Men, representative of every important industry which draws upon the forests for its raw material, were present from throughout the United States. Several came from foreign countries. The decennial celebration, of which the publication of this record is a part, was conceived as a mark of trib- ute to ten years of public service unique in the forest history of the world, and it was made possible by the contributions of over two hundred firms and individ- uals. Acknowledgment is here made by the committee for this striking evidence of good will, and the hope is expressed that this volume will reflect the spirit and character of the work of this institution during the first ten years of its public service. THE FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY A DECENNIAL RECORD PART I eerie ‘ PUB UN ‘ }, CHAPTER I WOOD AND HUMAN PROGRESS Knowledge is the torch of human progress. It throws its light forward and lifts each generation upward in the scale of civilization in proportion as that generation accepts its standards. In the story of creation, knowledge is symbolized by a tree. Down through the intervening ages man’s use of wood in attaining new heights of knowl- edge has been one of the most important factors in the advance of civilization. Primitive man, we are told, was dominated by the forest. But as his crude imagination slowly awakened to the arts of life, he finally succeeded in reversing the order of his environment by making the forests more and more serve his material needs. And in conquering the forests, he built up the material structure of his own civilization; he stimulated his latent consciousness of the power of civilization; he lifted himself from a life of savage and nomadic wandering to the social and industrial modernism of today. History is rich in evidence of the achievement of human progress through knowledge derived from wood. Man, it is held, was rescued from a state of savagery primarily by two discoveries: the art of kind- ling fire at his will and the use of the bow and arrow, which made him master of his food supply and provided him with clothing. Ages later, the discovery of iron, with which he could fashion wood more and more to serve his needs, appears to have been the step from bar- barism to the first stages of civilization. It would be difficult to express proper appreciation of wood as a material stimulus to learning and the arts of living. Its ready adapt- ability. we can well believe, made it the sculptor’s clay by which man tested and developed his first imaginative theories and laid the primi- tive foundation of much present day science. 'The origin of the prin- ciple of the wheel, which is an essential part of almost every machine or mechanical conveyance of our own age, is lost in antiquity, as evi- 2 Tue Forrest Propucts LABoratory denced by wooden wheels taken from the monuments of ‘ancient Egypt. In these same mounds are found the earliest recorded form of plows, made from wood, with iron tipped wedges. With these plows man acquired his first crude knowledge of extensive agriculture, and he used them, with slight modifications, until the first half of the eighteenth century. With wood, man learned to build homes and create architecture ;- to construct ships and master navigation; to build bridges and develop the science of mechanics; to generate steam and harness its power for transportation. Modern electric and magnetic science owes its birth to fossil resin from coniferous forests which were prehistoric when Pliny, seventy years before the dawn of Christianity, recorded the fact that amber, when rubbed, acquired the power of attracting straws. Thus, in diverse ways, fundamental principles have first been worked out from wood, and the knowledge thus gained—primitive though it may now appear—has been applied in developing the use of stone, iron, steel, concrete and other materials. The process still goes on. Within a decade, man has conquered the air with a wooden plane and is today applying the results of his experiments to the fabrication of an all metal machine. It is a striking fact that through the agency of wood, man has acquired more fundamental knowledge of related subjects than he has of the properties of wood itself. In the development of his wood craft, he has been likened to the growing child who, building with blocks, acquires an ever larger consciousness of their adaptability to new figures as experience matures his mind. Spurred by personal needs and the rewards of commercialism, however, man fashioned wood into many scores of standard products, about which trade-crafts took shape and became clearly defined through many centuries of compe- tition and zealous individualism. He thus built up a great diversified mass of wood-using lore, based, not upon a scientific knowledge of the many different kinds of wood used, but upon rule of thumb methods, beliefs, customs and prejudices, passed down from one generation to another as expanded by the increasing complexities of each changing age. Into this accumulated mass of trade practices, business methods, and usages built up through the years, there was injected, even up to Three A " | United States Foresters _, || Forest Service Gifford Pinchot 1900 - 1910 [cl Henry S. Graves William B. Greeley 1910 - 1920 1920- 4. Tuer Forest Propucts LABORATORY the beginning of our present century, little knowledge derived from pure scientific research into wood products and the wood products industries. However, by that time certain forces were well under way that were destined shortly to produce results and create an entirely new factor in the field of wood-using trade methods of America, and other countries also. CELA Paiva CARLY PERSPECTIVES OF HOREST UTILIZATION Abundant forests have made the United States the greatest wood-using nation of the world, but they have made it also the great- est wood waster of the world. Our lumbering practice has been built upon supplying the best the forest affords and leaving the rest as waste. Our forefathers commenced the practice because they had more forests than they knew how to use. Pioneers, moving westward, continued the system. And lumber consumers, educated to expect the best, continued to demand the best. Thus the great dictator of forest utilization in this country has been custom instead of specialized knowledge of the properties of our different woods. ‘The power of knowledge has been capitalized in a mechanical science for converting forests into lumber and manufactured products, a science which is unsurpassed anywhere in the world, and which has made wood avail- able in a greater variety of forms than any other material with which man comes in contact. It has made wood, as Roosevelt asserted, an indispensable part of the structure upon which our civilization rests, but its ready convertibility to man’s multitudinous needs appears to have held passive, so long as forests seemed inexhaustible, the stimulus to study its properties. The world today very generally accepts the view that forests are essential to progress and to social and industrial supremacy. The A DerEcENNIAL REcorD 5 culture of the forest-starved regions of Kurope leaves, in the minds ef those who have had opportunities to make comparisons, no doubt that there is a point below which forests can not safely be reduced. Kurope itself recognized that fact several centuries ago, but America, with its boundless forests, once thought inexhaustible, is just begin- ning fully to awaken to the cause of forest conservation espoused in this country a few decades ago by a small group of far-seeing men. The present Forest Service, a bureau of the United States Depart- ment of Agriculture, is the outgrowth of the study, thought and efforts of these men. Their purposes, however, were much opposed and misunderstood from the start. .A common misconception was that they proposed to lock up the forests against use; whereas what they sought was to re- place heedless and wasteful exploitation by rational management of the forests and by rational utilization of their products. They spoke from the experience of older countries and urged the application of knowledge then available as well as the acquirement of an additional knowledge needed to put our forest lands and our wood crops to their highest use in perpetuity. ‘They stressed the forest management that they had learned from Europe, but they did not fail to recognize that a knowledge of the properties of our many different woods is funda- mental to the economical utilization and conservation of our forest resources. In the report of the Division of Forestry for the year 1887, B. E. Fernow, Chief of the Division, wrote: “The properties upon which the use of wood, its technology, is based, should be well known to the forest manager if he wishes to produce a crop of given quality useful for definite purposes. Our ignorance in this direction has been most fruitful in fostering a wasteful use of our natural forests, and the same ignorance mis- leads even the forest planter of today in choosing the timber he plants and the locality to which he adapts it. How the Black Walnut has been sacrificed for fence material, how the valuable Chestnut Oak has rotted in the forest unused, how the Hemlock has been despised and passed by when it might have been suc- cessfully used to lengthen the duration of White Pine supplies. how timbers are now used in unnecessarily large sizes and applied Tue Forest Propucts LABORATORY fon) to uses for which they are not adapted, while other timbers are neglected for uses for which they are adapted—all these unfortu- nate misapplications are or have been due to lack of knowledge of the technological properties of our timbers. “Every day, almost, brings to light a new use for this or that timber, every now and then lumber papers are weighing the serv- iceability of this or that wood. Instead of proceeding on a sure and scientific basis in recommending the application of any wood to a particular use, opinions pro and con are brought to bear, and the proper development of our resources is thereby retarded. Yesterday it was Redwood that needed commendation in the market, today it is Cypress that must be praised in order to re- ceive due appreciation. Our timbers have never been fairly tested, or if they have their qualities are not duly appreciated. Many kinds have their use and value still hardly recognized; woods of exceptional value for manufacturing purposes are con- sumed for fuel; valuable and scarce varieties are used for coarse work, while cheaper and more abundant sorts are available. Still less knowledge exists in regard to the conditions of growth which influence the quality of woods. Crude ‘experience’ has been our SJ bi) guide, and ‘crude’ has remained our ‘knowledge’. Fifteen years later, Theodore Roosevelt, then President, broke all presidential precedents by addressing, at a private home in Wash- ington, a meeting of the Society of American Foresters, an organiza- tion which embraced the handful of American foresters of that time. During his talk, he said: “And now, first and foremost, you can never afford to forget for one moment what is the object of our forest policy. ‘That object is not to preserve the forests because they are beautiful, though that is good in itself, nor because they are refuges for the wild creatures of the wilderness, though that, too, is good in itself ; but the primary object of our forest policy, as of the land policy of the United States, is the making of prosperous homes. It is part of the traditional policy of home making of our country. Every other consideration comes as secondary. ‘The whole effort of the Government in dealing with the forests must be directed to this end, keeping in view the fact that it is not only necessary to start the homes as prosperous, but to keep them so. ‘That is A D&EcENNIAL- RECORD vi why the forests have got to be kept. You can start a prosperous home by destroying the forests, but you can not keep it prosper- ous that way. . . . ‘Forestry is the preservation of forests by wise use’.” In the midst of timber plenty, the work of early pioneers to advance the cause of forestry in this country belied itself to many, but in the years that followed, the rapidly enlarging spectacle of forest devastation accompanied by growing scarcity and increasing prices of wood, left in doubt no longer the accuracy of their vision or the justice of their endeavors. 'Today the problem of forest conservation stands out as one of the most vital economic issues of the nation. Knowledge accumulated during the past thirty years has served to crystalize the problem, for it is now generally conceded that its solu- tion les along two main lines of endeavor: the first is by stopping fur- ther devastation through such measures as will afford adequate pro- tection and regulation of our remaining forests and will put our forest- bearing lands on a permanent forest producing basis; the second is the curtailment of the annual drain upon the remaining forests by more complete and scientific use of the trees cut, a use arrived at by an accurate knowledge of the properties of the various woods and their economic use. SHIMULNNOD GNV SHWITIO ANVW WOU SOOT AHWOO HOIHM OL GUVA AHL A DECENNIAL REcorRD 9 CHAP TER.: Tht TEE FOREST. PRODUCTS, LABORATORY. EstaABLISH MENT The national need for research in forest products was recognized from the earliest days of the Division of Forestry and became increas- ingly apparent as forest exhaustion in the east advanced. Eventu- ally it asserted itself. The scanty appropriations of the first decade of American governmental forestry provided little money for research in forest products, and between 1890 and 1910 work was mainly of a cooperative nature and was done largely at various universities where laboratory facilities were obtainable or buildings were available for housing testing equipment. Studies of the mechanical properties of the more important woods were begun at the universities of Washington, Yale, Purdue, Califor- nia, and Oregon. Some preservation and kiln drying studies were undertaken at Yale, research in naval stores initiated in the South, and a small experimental pulp mill erected in Boston. Wood chem- istry and the chemistry of wood preservatives were also handled in a limited way at this latter place in 1907. During the following two years it became increasingly evident that greater facilities for research would have to be provided, and that centralization was essential to the success of the work. The very na- ture of research demands coordination of all related facts and studies, and this coordination is difficult to secure without centralization of allied research agencies. A very large part of the research work of the Forest Service had been carried out in cooperation with various universities, which had been glad to place some of their facilities at the disposal of the service, and so it was natural that, in the need for increased facilities, thought should be given to the universities. A thorough canvass of Washing- ton had already shown the utter futility of trying to rent suitable quarters for the small sum available. 10 THE Forest Propucts LABORATORY A. survey of available and potential facilities at a number of the universities was therefore made. An unexpectedly large number of universities showed a keen interest, and very generous offers were made by several. Finally, the offer of the University of Wisconsin, which included the erection of a suitable building and the furnishing of heat, light, and power for it, was accepted. Construction started in the summer of 1909, and the installation of equipment was begun in the fall, shortly after the nucleus of the organization arrived from Washington and established temporary quarters. At the time of the formal opening, June 4, 1910, the personnel consisted of about 45 people, drawn from the various lines of work under way elsewhere. Much of the credit for the progress of the lab- oratory belongs to the small group of loyal and enthusiastic workers comprising the original staff of the laboratory. They are the ones who laid down the general plans for the fundamental researches, worked out the details of procedure, and designed much of the special apparatus and machinery which was required for the preparation of the specimens and the carrying out of the tests. These preliminaries having been worked out, they proceeded to obtain the groundwork of information upon which most of the war work and the majority of the later general and special studies were based. GROWTH The first years of the laboratory’s existence were devoted to the task of getting the plant running and obtaining a grasp of funda- mentals. No marked increases in appropriations were secured, and expansion was comparatively slow. It was possible, however, to broaden the scope of the work gradually, and to establish satisfactory contact with the principal forest products industries. When the United States entered the war in the spring of 1917, the laboratory staff numbered eighty-four persons, a mass of funda- mental data on the properties of wood had been accumulated and good contact with the wood-using industries had been established. Thus equipped, the laboratory immediately bent all its efforts to war work, recognizing that the wood would play a major part in the con- flict. It immediately made its knowledge and facilities available to all the other branches of the government which had need of them. An A DEcENNIAL RECORD 11 analysis of the entire wood and forest products situation, from the standpoint of war needs, was begun at once, and steps were taken to secure the vast amount of information which this analysis showed would be needed by the War and Navy Departments. Contact was established with the various branches of these de- partments and others doing war work, and systematic cooperation undertaken. Funds were made available by the cooperating depart- ments, and the personnel of the laboratory was increased as rapidly as men could be trained for the specialized work. This expansion con- tinued throughout the war, and on armistice day the force numbered 458. Many of the problems presented to the laboratory were solved immediately with the knowledge available. Others were of new and specialized character and required the construction of special ma- chinery and the making of many special tests. The experience and the vision of the older men in the various branches of the work proved to be invaluable in the planning and execution of these special investi- gations. It is safe to say that a large measure of the usefulness of the laboratory during the war would have been lost had these men, instead of remaining in the organization, answered the many calls to other fields and gone where greater financial reward and personal gain would have resulted. Many developments of the war, new inventions and new proc- esses, chemical and physical, born under the stimulus of war necessity and devoted to military use were found after the armistice to be of value in peace times industry, either with or without modifications. In the poison gas campaign normal time industry profited by discoveries that, lacking the stress of national emergency, might not have come in years of development. The unbelievable progress in aeronautics in a brief four years, at once, upon the cessation of hostilities, was converted to commercial. sporting and other transportation, such, for instance, as the mails. The same thing happened in many fields, among them forest products research. During the war, no effort had been made to publish and distribute the results of the laboratory’s researches,—in fact, a very large per- centage of the war work was secret and confidential and did not permit of publication. Special effort has since been made by the entire or- 12 Tue Forest Propucts LABORATORY ganization to disseminate as much of the accumulated information as has useful application among the industries. The re-establishment of many of the contacts, which were broken during the war, was undertaken, and fundamental researches, tem- porarily laid aside, were resumed. Plans were perfected for further study of several new lines of research undertaken during the war, and for rounding out the investigative program of the laboratory. ORGANIZATION The laboratory is organized upon a basis intended to yield the greatest measure of scientific results with the minimum amount of time and energy devoted to the mere mechanics of operation, and the routine of the organization is centered almost entirely in separate service sections; so that the research men may be relieved, as much as possible, from everything except the planning and execution of re- search investigations. This type of organization has proved itself very well adapted to research institutions, since, in the final analysis, the success of a research institution depends in greater measure, than is the case with most organizations, upon the individuals composing its staff. Research is most individualistic; and while it is possible for the leaders in the organization to plan and direct the research of the various men, the success of each project depends to an unusual degree upon the man immediately in charge of it. The technical work of the laboratory is divided among seven sections, each of these units devoting its investigations to certain well defined fields. In addition to the research sections there are four service units carrying on the many functions, such as finance, engi- neering, maintenance, personnel details and so forth, essential to the smooth working of an organization of the size of the laboratory. In these service units is grouped for convenience the office that handles the editorial work, and to this office is assigned the responsibility for the general dissemination of the results of all the laboratory's re- search. Every effort is made to reach the entire wood industrial field through a variety of mediums. Coordination of research activities is handled through a small subdivision, tributary to the director’s A DerceNNIAL REcoRD 13 office, acting as a balance wheel or governor to the entire program of the research portion of the laboratory. To one interested in getting a more intimate grasp of the lab- oratory organization scheme a study of the chart on the following page will serve better than a descriptive effort. Further, there can be gained from this chart a good general idea of the main lines of research pursued at the present time (1921). Forest Service Products Offices A discussion of the organization of the Forest Products Lab- oratory would not be complete without mentioning the forest products offices in several of the headquarters of tne western districts of the Forest Service. While not a part of the Madison organization, their work is intimately tied in with the laboratory through chiefly furnish- ing a close contact with the industries in the several districts. The offices of the District Foresters at Missoula, San Francisco and Portland are assigned one or more men to handle the work in this field that occurs within the states covered by these offices. Reporting to the District Forester at Portland there is also a timber testing lab- oratory maintained in cooperation with the University of Washing- ton, at Seattle, which works on local problems referred to it directly or indirectly. The personnel of the district products offices offers broader outlets, in somewhat remote regions, for the work of the laboratory than otherwise would prevail. Handling many local problems directly on the ground the field men are also enabled to rapidly obtain for the industries information or special investigations from the laboratory through interior organi- zation channels. 'To these same offices the laboratory in turn occa- sionally refers problems that can be handled better in the field. The relationship, in the final analysis, is the logical outcome of the insep- arable tie that the development of forest products utilization, repre- sented by the laboratory, has to the silvicultural and management aspects of national forestry practice in this country. ‘sanor “TA “SEN'TO IWIOWMMNOD 40 AGNIS “SHNTD IAVISIE “3M WALYK 40 INSNRAOWMW] ONY LNDIdOTRARE $3ni9 IMVASIS3Y BILVA oa ee ee “SLondowd @ IRV ONINIO NI SHF1AONd xXvANUL im - be & *SWIS1GOWd ONIHALOVANNVA GOOMKTd SISM1 ALTTIGvWnd GY HOLS 30710 swaieokd ONINID \ WI3H “1° \\ SOOM TVIOHENWOD ON LLYIML ‘a°* “SHAILVANASIMd COOK SNOTHVA NV31 OVW ‘at -4 \ SW3WOR ENIMWN WOWd ONTTId LNNH a it) ' ! 00K ORLVIMLNA CNY GALYUL J AyO90 HOW SHWLLONIS NEIOOM 40 NOLLOSLOWd NOILVAYIS3¥d GOOM NOLLVAUSSaud i I | ! Nama: (ieee | SXIWOLOWA ONDIHOM JOOM NI dVAINNG “3"W Hl 1 OULNOD ALIGDANH YO4 SALVuvddy 40 NOISZa TOULNOD ALIGINH i} ' BONLLWOD LNVIEISSY FHALSIOW 40 LNSVdOTAARG ONY SNIJ00Ud JUNILSIONW 1 ! | | AVUG “M'W | ! did JO AuLSIMGHD } 1 | i} $173M'0°S | | JDAVHD NI ONIL IY ESOMTIEIO“L IN bd Bd i] “> 40 HUALOVANNYW FHL WOd Utd GOOM 40 ALITIGYLIOS waTUON'Y 3anu‘a NHor | es es 31LLNL*3°u c SSOdUNd ONINNVL HOd RVG ZLSYM 4O NOLLVZITLIO I I NOLLNGTMLSIG - NOLLVOTIaNd ~ LIGHT - mzIAqy SSH9OUd MLIKAINS FHL AG MAd¥d GNY did 40 SMOLOVANNYW $$3908d 3JLIHA INS 1 | UadVd GNV diNd ! 1 ISLINS3Y 40 NOILVSITENd) | “did d0Om 40 SSN JHL 30 NOISNALYa S113 'Q°S i ! WEdVd ONY did JO SWALOVAONYH HAL JO Aanis $3s$3900d | ! JALVHdINS ONY VaoS | Pe atl “SivEIva GNV “SWND 'STIO TYLLNASST i 1 (00M 40 NOLLISOdNOD TWOUKGHO | I AMLSIW3HD 3890791139 | 1 ! | “LSAGAVS G3ZK TONGAN 4O S¥SN FHL 40 AGALS GQuVUYSHS ‘"9°3 ' | HONDI SLIHAS ALS¥M WOWs IOHOOTY "LHLT | LENGMVE WOW “TOHOOTY ‘LAKLG | ! VOHOITVY WAHL] AZ1AVH ‘4°71 = | | | : NVW3LVG *3 yb SALLYAWISTYd GOOM 40 SLondoud aZAluza \ I SOLIS IMBLOVYVHO "IVOISAHd ONY NOLLISOdKOD "TVOTRGHD SYAIAVAU3S3INd GOOM | | | | . | | “NOLLOVMLYE GN NOLLYTTILSI@ G00m 40 SLondo’d AJ1AVH “4°71 1 | 40 NOILYZITLLN ONY NOLLOAdOUd NI AONTIOLASS MOILVT1IL4SI0 GOOM t | 1 | 1 | “SAALLVAMTSHUd 40 LLTOTYOL , i NOLLMGATWd WISH. ONY SLOW ONTOTING ae sirara"d0=09 A31109 "HY | | InDosunes1d ONL raAY IOND ONTAYSU GOOM OXY AVOGC OL GOOM 40 SONVISI i : SLONGOWd LESYOA 40 SNOLLIGNOD FDVHOLS H | | i ONLLNNODOY L809 - ONIGTHX SHIL - SINAN IOddY NIVLS ONY GION LNAATHd OL SCOKLAA | ADOIOHivd | LVd i | Di SLNNOIIV '‘ a\ Dp Og i eas Z ~ pees ‘ Nid - 2 ~ SW3180Ud HONVISSIY IWINLSNGNI IWOINHDSL ---~ _- SC Lee NOISNSLX3 GNV JIIANSS JINV Be Pa << _—— - s 3 erie — a aN x | ~ x ee a Nn SS a oe a“ IY aS a “a x SS ae ve ~ Frese = z mee ~ Se 4 x SN _ a“ ~ ~~. ee or SS — S ~ ~ = nat ~ ~ ae ~ - sme ‘“ . . oN "O'd MOLONIHSVM 2°d NOLDNIHSVA ee yoLoauIG “L.SSVY YITLNG W'0- ’ . SLWNOJIV GNV AULSNQNI LKVId yo1sauiad MOTSNIM d 311eV9 Gc JONVNIA soe AYOLVUOGYT SLINGOYd LSINO4 u31Sa404 “LSSV gdV¥19 °H TYV9 HIYVISIY 10 HONVUE waisauo4 AJ1399N9 “@ WVITIIM JIIAWAS LSI04 Auvaauoas JQVTIVM 2 AYNGH JUNLINIYIVY JO LNIWLYVdId SN “ou dO ONINOSYES DAL ONILOasdV SaILHadOUd TYOISAMA “SH10GdS SNOTHVA ONINOSVaS MIv QNy¥ ONTAM] MID) NI HOdvaSad OMIAHI WITH NI SWTIGOMd GNy SASSa00ud TwI OHM dO KONLS “STILWadOWd OL SHALONULS 40 NOLIVTW “SUALLVINGSTUCTY TWIMLSAMAE 40 NOLLONMLSNI “SH1OFdS 40 NOILdI OSC GNV NOLLYN DYWELad SSONVHD FUNLEION HLIM ONITTANS (NV JOVUNIWHS OL CYVOTY NI GOOM 40 HOIAVHSE “GSN WISH OL OND IVIaY SNOLLIGNOD ONY SHWELSMUYY WuvdS 40 AGALS * HOOLS NOISNZHIM ‘TIVAS ONY WADINT ONTZITLLN ANY ONTYUALOYANNYN 40 SGOHLGA LNSIOI4ST LSOW ONY LNSSTYd 40 SaLaALs “S9S GOOM 40 AGALS TWIMLSAGNI GNY TVOILSILVLs “ALSvM GNY GdVYD MOT 40 NOLLYZIIILN IDIONOOT “SITMLSNGNI ONISM-doam 40 S3IGALs “SLONGOUd LSHUO4 40 TUALOVANNYN 40 SSIGALS “SN LOTWHOO OL SAIOadS 40 NOLLVLdvay "SLONGOWd N3dOOM YAHLO ONY WOOLS NOISNAWIG ‘SAIL-SSOWD ‘YaqNO od SNOLLVOISIOAdS ONY ‘S3GVUO 'SHZIS 40 NOLLYZIGUVGNYLS "SAALLVINESSYdIY “IVIMLSNGNT 40 NOLLONUMLSNI “SHXO8 NIGO9M 40 ONTddVULS “ONTHOVd 40 SGOHLAW GNV SHENIVLNOD 40 AGALS *SLHVd QNVIdHIY OL HLIM SLONUOWd GALYOTHAV4 40 P ULS ‘SaDSTULS THAIN TV l0GdS OI419adS ONY LUNI SHOLOVA Snolsad “SONINGLSV4 ONY “SHOI1dS ‘SLNIO SMOTYVA JO ADNATOISSa “SHAQNIL TWHALONMLS 4O JSA GNV HLONTULS “SWOd COOMAId 40 NOISTC GNV HLONAHLS “SONINSLSV4 ONY SLNIOf COOMATd “SISAL dOOmM1d CHVaNVLS “SS0VUD MOT ONY SZZ1S TIVWS ONISN SHIOILYY GTMNLOVANNYH *SNOL SZ911dS 40 SBLLIII ONV SNOLLVLINIT “STIOILYY CFWALOVANNW 40 NOISSQ GNY HLONZULS “Q00M JO HLONTMLS NO INHALVSML FALLVAYSSHMd 40 LOddsa “NOOLS ONIGNG@ ONTITOW GNV ONDW@LS 40 SLod44a “SOOM JO HLONSULS FHL NO ONIAUG NIDA AO Lodaaa “FSO 40 SNOLLVLINT'T (NY HLONSMLS NO SLog4zd 40 SONAN'LANI “SNINIOSdS YVFIO' TIVAS 40 HLONTMLE N313HL 4104 SHIAUG NTH Y3THION YNHLYY ADOTONHIIL GOOM NNVWA3IL “GO “H QooM SNIAKG 40 SAV1 WAN3WVONNS NOSMA3HLVW ‘S‘T AQNLS HILSINNV NUVdS NOSN3G ‘O'°V AGNiS ADOLS NOISNIMIG NOSdN YNHLYV QOoOM iO MOILVZITILA §=IWINLSNONI SLIHM *95°d SIOVYUDGNV SNOLLVIIdID3dS LLAASV1d “WD SU3NIVLNOD YUaAVUL ‘A SD AGnis livudulV NITASN VT $21nw DNIGVUD e38miL TWanioneis 31G0N3U9°S‘H GQOOMA1d HO3H *3°D SI1DILYY GINNLIVINNV NOSTIM “D°U'L HLON3ULS NO AN3W1V3UL 40 193443 JOUVANUUW OPT $3193dS 40 NOSINVdwo> Y31H3O% YNHLYV N313HL 3104 SSISAHd YAGWIL NOSdN YNHLYYV SN,1,0,S,ANI IVINLSNGNI LOY VME eT NITMAN Ye T26l St YaeNGOTI OL CaLoaHuO0d ----p--- mae ae Et Sa eE ee Ae Se ee ee ee ee ene NOILVNIGHOOS NOILVY3d0 AYOLVYOSYT BIVTSNIS “1'4 TWOULNOD 193r0ud MMO GALLVOTLSAANT 40 SSHHOOWd GNY SOLVLS WANN ‘d*d Saltddns AANNIX “O'S saquod3u 3XSIN3G “YT Sualuvno WANINE “dD AaNNOSU3d AHdVaSOLOHA NOST3N‘°1'a ONIN33NISNG AaWUOL “Yu DNILNdwOS ONIddIHS = SSNOHKIMVM - SHOOMHGLS ~ INANaMNDONd KHAVHOONMLE = "IOWLNOO "IIVM = AUYURIT - STITA ALITIBVLINNODDY ALWadOWd = SOTAMAS WONML - FOLAWaS WHONaSSAH SOTAWSS NVWHOLYM ONY HOLINYS - SONWNALNIVW Y@ONI SIGISIA ONY “SHdVYD ‘SLYVHO ~ TDAVATHIM TYNOSHEd - "IOULNOD INDINDISSY - INTHAOTAKE VLVO AWQLVMOGY 40 NOLLVLNSSTWMY OTHdVYOOLOHE = SAHALOId NOLLOW - SNOILVMLSNTIT 1HOdtY dOHS "IVOTMLOGTIA ~ dois HN THOWW CUVA CMY ‘VIDIMV8 = dOHE GOOM - ON LLavud STHYMAQS ~ NOLLVTIdVOD ~ SHOLLVINITVD 16 Tue Forest Propucts LABORATORY EQUIPMENT Mr. Howard Weiss, director of the laboratory from 1912 to 1917, tells the following story of conditions prior to the establishment of the laboratory : “At that time I was in the office of Wood Preservation, and was in charge of the Section of Research, which consisted of myself and the title. Since we had no permanent laboratory, we had to move around from place to place with what little equip- ment we could gather together. “Tt was about this time that I was sent to the great Southern Lumber Company at Bogalusa, La., to show them how to pre- serve timber. All I had was two galvanized iron tanks which I had had made at a cost of about $20 each.” From this meager outfit has grown the present thoroughly equipped section of wood preservation at the laboratory, with a large pressure treating plant handling several dozen ties at a charge, smaller pressure cylinders, one of which is capable of injecting preservatives at a pressure of 600 pounds to the square inch, and much auxiliary and special apparatus permitting carrying on of preservative treatments according to any commercial or experimental process. Handling as it does the glue and laminated wood studies, the section of preservation is also suitably equipped with glue mixing and spreading machines, hot and cold presses, strength test machines, an aircraft propeller manufacturing plant and a series of conditioning rooms where temperature and humidity are under control. The first efforts at wood testing in this country were strength tests on timbers of several species of American woods. In this sense one may say that the study of timber mechanics of wood was the lead- ing field of research. Today the equipment of this important part of the laboratory is especially complete, and most of the equipment was designed by the laboratory engineers. A timber thirty feet in length is readily accommodated in the capacious jaws of the new million-pound testing machine recently erected as part of the equipment of the timber mechanics laboratory. This same giant of wood breakers will test the strength of horizontal, built-up beams, trusses and girders with a length as great as eighty (1920) = wi TESTING MACHINE > a TIMBEE POUND MILLION OF THE CTION PRE 18 THE Forest Propucts LABORATORY feet. While this indicates the maximum capacity of the Forest Prod- ucts Laboratory to test timbers and huge built-up members, the equip- ment for lesser parts is especially complete. Ten machines capable of applying breaking strains of from 10,000 to 200,000 pounds are also available. ‘Toughness and impact.resistance are measured on other machines, while many special tools and rigs are here for special tests, including those for testing plywoods. Most of these machines are original devices that first saw the light of day in the laboratory as need for them arose in the progress of the development of the technique of testing wood. The box laboratory, a part of the work of timber mechanics, is equipped with two tumbling drums, the larger of which can take boxes weighing as much as half a ton, and reduce them slowly or quickly to a shattered wreck—the quickness of the breaking depending on the amount of resistance built into the box by its designers. Here also can be measured the ability of a box to stand tension and compression, drop tests and similar abuse. The drying of wood by almost any conceivable variation of tem- perature, humidity and circulation within practical limits is possible in the laboratory equipment of six dry kilns of commercial size, all closely regulated and entirely automatic and autographic in their operation. In addition to the kilns, a conditioning apparatus permits fundamental research in the conditioning and treating of wood under pressures or gases, and under absolutely controlled factors. This apparatus, as well as the kilns and many supplemental devices, was designed by laboratory engineers. Completely equipped to make wood pulp by any of the commer- cial chemical or mechanical processes and convert the pulp into paper by cylinder or Fourdrinier process, the pulp and paper section meas- ures up to the general standards of equipment existing throughout the laboratory. The list of equipment sounds like a combination of several paper-making plants, but of course everything is on a laboratory rather than on a commercial scale. The main items recognizable by the paper manufacturer are a wood chipper, sulphite and soda digesters and necessary auxiliaries, grinder, pulp press, wet machine, beaters, Jordan and a 22-inch combination cylinder and Fourdrinier paper- making machine. Pressers, driers, colenders, ete., complete the list. In addition to complete chemical equipment, a constant humidity and A DEcCENNIAL REcoRD 19 temperature room is maintained for strength tests on the finished products. The section devoted to derived products, dealing with the many phases of the chemistry of wood, carries as its working tools the usual chemical laboratory equipment. Much special equipment is used, especially instruments for measuring accurately the various physical and chemical properties of oils, sugars and solutions. Specialized equipment consists of complete semi-commercial plants for produc- tion of ethyl alcohol and stock food from sawdust; destructive distil- lation of hardwoods and softwoods; the extraction with volatile solv- ents of resinous woods, waste paper products and other materials. Pathological work, largely a study of fungi and their effect on wood in many fields of use and from many viewpoints, is carried on by a cooperating office of the Bureau of Plant Industry. The equipment for the work is complete, consisting of all necessary apparatus and mediums for studying fungi under various conditions. Included in the working equipment are pure culture samples of various wood fungi used for comparative studies. The enumeration of this sundry physical equipment of the lab- oratory is made mainly to outline briefly to the prospective user, the man with a wood problem but unacquainted with the laboratory, what can be expected in the way of a capacity to handle that problem. The enumeration also indicates the growth in the science of wood technol- ogy and research in ten years, for it must be remembered that at the time of the establishment of the laboratory, an uncharted sea lay be- fore the youthful explorer. Much of the complex testing machinery in use at the laboratory stands as a marker or buoy in the portion of the unknown that has been charted. A vast and unlimited field yet re- mains ahead. PERSONNEL It has been said that an institution is but the lengthened shadow of a great man. The laboratory, from its rather composite nature, more properly, as it stands today, is the lengthened shadow of many men. ‘To its establishment and to its development many men have contributed the best that they had to give. The strength of the lab- oratory in its own particular field, after the brief lapse of ten years, aoc) | Three a Forest Products Directors fi ; Laboratory La McGarvey Cline 1910 -1912 Howard F Weiss Carlile P Winslow 1912 - 1917 1917- “AS VUVUVVVVYPOGIVVVVYVVIVVYV YG VOVUYVOIIVVV UN VOUY VVOVY VY VV VGVIYVIVOVVPVUYVVOVUVUNY BYVOVVVVVVYVV VV VV VV VVVOVU9 VV VV POND OVOVV IVP VVVV VIN VOVVVVVPVVVV VV VVV UV VV VVVOV UO VVVVVVVVVVVUVVDVVVUVVVOVVUUUVVNNUNUN A DeECENNIAL RECORD 21 testifies that this best was no mean gift. Recognition of the ability of the men who have been associated with the laboratory by indus- tries, by technical societies, by great industrial associations and by the governments of this and other countries is a part of the record of the laboratory that in itself would require much space to tell. It has been told elsewhere that the need for the laboratory was recognized for many years before its creation actually became a physi- cal fact. Of interest are the first steps in forest products research, first only a man or two with ideas, then the establishment of small scattered units working on big problems with but meager equipment and limited means usually nearest the point where the problem ex- isted. ‘The realization grew upon some of these pioneers that problems of nation-wide interest involving many industries were being most inadequately provided for, and little progress being made toward far- off goals. ‘The evolution of a new approach toward the desired ends marked the important step that is of chief interest in the story of the Decennial. Mr. Howard EF. Weiss saw the germ of the present lab- oratory conceived and described it in an address to members of the laboratory several years ago. “It was in 1908 that I was brought face to face with the fool- ishness of the whole situation. I felt like a very poor repre- sentative of the greatest government on earth in thus trying to demonstrate the art of preserving timber with a lack of funds for effective organization. “It was in Washington that I met McGarvey Cline who was having similar difficulties although engaged in a somewhat dif- ferent line of work. Many an evening we spent discussing pos- sible ways of putting into execution the plan of equipping a suitable laboratory, with the lack of funds always confronting us. Our first ground gained was permission to spend $125 per month for renting a building in which we might locate the labora- tory. The job fell to me to find a building for this purpose. I spent many weeks going from Chevy Chase to Great Falls and all through Georgetown, looking up buildings with sufficient floor space, and which could be rented at $125 per month. I was un- able even to get an abandoned car barn for this amount. “Then Cline conceived a brilliant idea. It was to secure the cooperation of some university. I did not think this was a very 22 THe Forest Propucts LABorRATORY good move but the more we talked it over, the more I became in favor of it. We carried the proposition to Mr. Pinchot, the For- ester, who was favorably impressed with the idea and wrote to about a dozen universities suggesting the scheme to them. The idea met with hearty approval and resulted in establishing the Forest Products Laboratory at Madison in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin, the University to furnish the building, heat, light and power. “The credit for this organization belongs to Mr. Cline, as he was the one who actually conceived the idea and put it into opera- tion. “Then came the struggle to equip the place for which we had little money. I had $120 alloted to me to equip the section of Wood Preservation, in which I was specializing, and it required $3,200 to install the machinery which I wanted.” Under these handicaps the first men of the laboratory laid the foundation upon which the present structure has its footing. McGar- vey Cline served as the first director of the institution in whose found- ing he had such an important hand, leaving in 1912 to enter com- mercial life after the work was well established. Others who played leading roles in the work of the early days when the laboratory was still in the formative state were Mr. William L. Hall, who, as Assistant Forester, had administrative charge of the laboratory in the days immediately following its inception and Dr. W. K. Hatt of the Purdue University faculty, at one time in charge of all timber test work for the Forest Service and later acting in a consulting capacity on various features of the work, especially in timber mechanics. Through the days of the war emergency, Mr. Karl H. Clapp was the Assistant Forester in charge of the Branch of Research of which the laboratory is a unit. Possibly the best measure of the worth of the laboratory is an estimate of the practical value of the research results. These have been described elsewhere in this volume. The next measure is an esti- mate of the caliber of the men that make up its personnel. To a de- gree, the two are naturally inseparably related. The record of the requests made by wood using industries and other points of laboratory contact, for laboratory men to transfer their allegiance to these other fields speaks well for the ability of the men who have served here. A A DEcCENNIAL REcORD 23 list of such men who have left the technical staff of the laboratory for other fields is given in the appendix to this volume. CHAPTER IV TEN YEARS OF RESEARCH IN FOREST PRODUCTS The decade following the founding of the Forest Products Lab- oratory in 1910 is marked by a convulsive upheaval,—economiec, so- cial and political—unsurpassed in modern history. In the United States, at least, the ten-year period is now commonly divided into the eras “the pre-war years’, “during the war’, and “the post-war period”. ‘The latter is, of course, only begun, but a definite readjust- ment and new alignment of economic forces is already in the making. So in discussing the laboratory development, and particularly the field of its accomplishments, the descriptive effort naturally falls into the cycles: pre-war six years, war period of two years, and the read- justment or post-war period of two years. ‘The first two are here treated in some detail; the latter period and its outstanding features has already been discussed. PrEe-wak RESEARCH The early work of the laboratory was largely fundamental in character, and was, in many instances, a continuation of investigations which had been under way at one or more of the various smaller lab- oratories which were discontinued when the Forest Products Labora- tory was organized. In fact, full credit for some of the accomplish- ments described in this chapter belongs to the pioneers of those early days, who struggled along in the dark with practically no funda- mental knowledge of the properties of wood to guide them. doom JO WVHd LVAUD V YO LNAWDSOVUH TIVINS V ONICGSAL YO4 SHNIHOVI FZUV WUAH-AUYUOLVUORVT SOINVHOUN YHAWIL AHL A DeEcENNIAL RECORD ho Or In the Mechanics of Timber While no attempt has been made to arrange the various subjects in order of size or importance, it seems natural and logical to give first mention to the basic study of the properties of American woods. ‘This is, without doubt, the most important series of tests ever conducted on American species, not only in actual size, but also in importance of results secured. Over 200,000 strength tests and about the same num- ber of specific gravity and moisture determinations, in all well over half a million individual tests, have been made, covering every com- mercial species in the country and many of only minor importance. The tests were made on specimens cut from typical trees and were so planned and executed that proper analysis of the results has yielded, besides actual and comparative strength values of green and air-dry wood of the various species, much additional information of funda- mental character, such as the relation of strength to weight, of strength to the height in the tree, the effect of distance from the pith upon the strength properties, and the relation between strength and rate of growth. The test data are frequently used for special studies, being re- grouped and analyzed to bring out whatever unusual property or relation of properties may be desired. They form the starting point, also, for much of the experimental work upon structural material and parts of structures, such as aircraft parts. Work of previous experimenters has shown that the amount of moisture present in the wood had a very marked effect upon its strength, and efforts had been made to deduce the laws underlying this relation. It remained for the timber testing laboratory at Yale to plan and carry out a series of tests which not only yielded specific data on the moisture-strength relation for several species, but also proved the existence of a definite point, now called the “‘fiber-satura- tion point”, beyond which the amount of moisture did not affect either strength or shrinkage. This basic information is in constant use in all of the studies of the mechanical and physical properties of wood. The requirements for grading rules for structural timbers differ from those for rough and worked lumber since strength is a very im- portant consideration in structural timber, and it is highly desirable that this class of material be graded on the basis of strength, so that the 26 THe Forest Propucts LAaBporatory “better” grades will be uniformly stronger than the poorer ones. ‘This allows higher fiber stresses and consequently more efficient use, since allowance does not have to be made for the occasional weak piece which slips in under grading rules patterned after lumber grading rules. The laboratory has studied and analyzed the effect of defects and physical properties upon the strength of structural material, and has drawn up grading rules for the two principal structural timber spe- cies. ‘These rules have been adopted by the associations concerned and are now in everyday use. ‘Tables of allowable fiber stresses under various conditions of service to be used with these rules, have also been drawn up. So far as known, this is the first successful attempt on a commercial scale to grade structural timber on a basis of strength. Efficient design of any article requiring strength demands not only that sufficient strength be present, but also that this strength be secured at a minimum expenditure of material. 'To balance the con- struction by the elimination of surplus material is frequently more difficult than simply to strengthen an admittedly weak part by the addition of more material. Through a series of tests upon white oak barrels, in which the barrels were subjected to various kinds of tests, such as internal pressure tests and drop tests, the laboratory deter- mined the proper relation among stave thickness, head thickness and hoop spacing to yield the best service with the smallest amount of material. New types of barrels, based upon the results of these tests, have been approved by the Interstate Commerce Commission. Just as in the design of barrels, so also with boxes, crates, and other types of shipping containers, one of the most important design problems is to secure a “balanced construction” affording greatest strength at least cost. The proper selection of the species or kind of wood for various uses is also very important. The laboratory has perfected a box testing drum giving consistent results which indicate the value of any type of construction for the shipment of goods and has developed various standard types of box constructions which have been adopted by the associations of manu- facturers and of users of boxes. It has also investigated and tested the relative value of many woods for box making and divided them into four groups on this basis, the woods in each group to be used inter- changeably. This work represents the greatest single step forward BOX TESTING IN THE BIG TUMBLING DRUM—A LABORATORY DEVICE FOR QUICKLY DETERMINING BOX OR CRATE WEAKNESSES le eee eee ee re ee SE ae ee ee 28 THE Forresr Propucrs Lasorarory _ a ee a ee ee in box design and proper selection of box species which has so far been taken. Typical of various studies is the one made on hickory. A large number of tests on spokes and other vehicle parts showed definitely ‘that “red” hickory was not inferior to “white” hickory in its mechani- cal properties, and that grading rules discriminating against it on account of color were basically unsound. Tests on larger vehicle parts such as axles, bolsters, and poles brought out the relative merits of hickory and various substitute woods which the ever-increasing short- age of hickory has forced into use. The relative strength of various species of wood when used as telephone or other electric poles has been determined through actual strength tests of a number of poles, simulating as nearly as possible actual conditions in service. Several series of tests have also been made upon cross arms of various sizes and species, to determine the strength and proper design. Tor many years, timber cut from southern pine trees which had been “bled” or turpentined was considered inferior on that account and suffered discrimination. Strength tests made upon “bled” and “unbled” wood showed that the turpentining had not injured the wood, and enabled this material to assume its proper commercial value. In the Preservative Treatment of Woods The preservation of structural timbers against decay has long been recognized as very desirable, particularly from the economic standpoint, and the treatment of this class of material is growing. There has, however, been considerable confusion concerning the effect of the treatment upon the strength of the material. This has naturally tended to retard the progress of the art. The laboratory has conducted a series of tests upon various species of wood, treated and untreated, and has shown just how much each kind of treatment has affected the strength. This led to improvement in processes which were injurious and to greater confidence in the strength of treated timber, besides furnishing data to be used in the design of structures of treated timber. Wooden piling and other wooden structures placed in salt water. especially in southern waters, suffer severely from the attacks of ma- rine borers of various kinds, and the annual loss from this one cause A DeEcENNIAL RECORD 29 alone is tremendous. Preservation with creosote has been practiced for many years, but not always with success. ‘The laboratory has made extensive studies on the resistance of various tars and creosotes and their fractions to marine borer attack, and has collected numerous service records. ‘The problem is by no means solved, however, and many related factors such as temperature and salinity of water, avail- able food supply and other biological aspects of the question need fur- ther study and correlation. A great deal of study must also be made upon the various constituents of creosote and their relative effective- ness. The discoloration of the sapwood, principally of pine, which is commonly known as “sap stain’, is considered a defect in most grades of finishing lumber, and causes much loss from degrade. Various improvements in chemical dipping to prevent sap stain have been developed at the laboratory, and experiments have been made show- ing that proper kiln drying will obviate the staining. An objection frequently raised against creosoted wood block pavements is that the creosote oozes from them in warm weather, pro- ducing a very disagreeable and dangerous surface. After a study of the various factors involved and the making of a number of experi- mental preservation runs on wood blocks, a method was evolved whereby the observation of certain precautions in the process resulted in reducing to a minimum the objectionable “bleeding”? common up to that time. In the drawing of specifications adopted by the American Wood Preservers’ Association and the American Society for Munici- pal Improvements, for the treatment and laying of wood blocks in pavements, the laboratory played a prominent part. Knowledge of the toxicity and preservative value of different kinds of preservatives, both proprietary and otherwise, is fundament- ally necessary, so that. the good ones may be developed and the poor eliminated. The laboratory has made tests on and analyzed practi- cally all the important preservatives which have been on the market since its inception. Fundamental information concerning the relative ease of treat- ment with preservatives has been obtained for all of the woods ordi- narily treated in this country. An important commercial application of this information lies in the grouping of woods for treatment. AYOLVYORVT AHL LV YACNITAO NOILVAYHSHUd AHL DNIYWALNGA SHILL AO ADUVHO V A DEcCENNIAL RECORD 31 A. subject of tremendous importance, upon which comparatively little work has been done so far is the fireproofing of wood through painting or the injection of chemicals. The laboratory has developed apparatus for the measurement of the inflammability of either natural or “‘fireproofed” wood and has studied the relative inflammability of untreated wood of many species and of specimens treated with vari- ous kinds of fireproofing agents. The relative value of several methods of fireproofing has been studied and a fireproofing paint de- veloped. The final test of any wood-preserving process or material lies in the results which it yields in actual service; no laboratory test can simulate the widely varying conditions encountered in use with suf- ficient accuracy. Therefore, a large number of experimental tests of treated timber have been placed throughout the country, principally in cooperation with large consumers of timber. There are tests of treated ties, poles, fence posts, mine timbers, wood block pavements, and piling timbers, some of which have been in place for about 15 years. Various treatments and various species of wood were used in each case, and complete records of treatment and periodical inspection kept. These records form the best available measure of the value of various preservatives and preserving processes under ordinary service conditions. The study and analysis of wood preservatives has been a major project since the inception of the laboratory. Especial attention has been given to the analysis and grading of coal-tar and water-gas-tar creosote, and a number of refinements have been made in the art. This work has had commercial application not only in the improvement of specifications for preservatives, but also in the modification of the technique of plant operation. In Kiln Drying and the Physical Properties of Wood The artificial seasoning of wood, commonly called “kiln drying’, has been practiced by rule-of-thumb methods to a large degree for many years; and in any event it was a commercial practice only with comparatively easy drying conditions, since little progress had been made in handling successfully the drying of species and sizes of mate- rials which did not readily respond to the generally unscientific proc- 32 Tuer Forest Propucts LABORATORY esses In vogue. Recognizing that, after all, any failures to succeed with the more difficult conditions imposed by the demands of industry for wider application of kiln drying, were simply attributable to a lack of fundamental knowledge of the physical properties of the wood to be dried, the laboratory from the beginning made kiln drying one of the leading studies. ‘The study centered on the physics of timber and, as a natural auxiliary, a study and consequent development of apparatus to perform the drying operation. The outstanding features of kiln drying as developed in the past ten vears at the laboratory are: first, absolute control of moisture and temperature conditions in the entire kiln or any part of it at any stage of the drying; second, an exact knowledge of physical changes taking place in the lumber in the kiln throughout the run; and third, the per- fection of means of diagnosing these changes and applying any cor- rective measures necessary in case adverse conditions develop. The natural result of these ten years of study has been a notable contribution to the knowledge of timber physics, the invention and development of several types of kilns and auxiliary apparatus that have been quite widely adopted in the fields of kiln drying where they are especially suited, the extension of kiln drying with its economic advantages to new fields and the elimination of much loss that had been taken mistakenly for granted in kiln drying practice. Schedules for proper drying with practically no loss from de- grade, have been developed for many species and sizes of material from dimension oak to smaller sizes of pine. As to the kilns, the water spray and superheated steam types are largely of laboratory develop- ment, and they have received the main attention considering the ob- jectives in mind. Fundamental data on the structure of wood, as revealed under the microscope, serve as foundation for many laboratory studies, and for the identification of wood as to species through examination of the wood itself rather than by a study of the botanical characteristics of the tree. Authentic specimens of most of the trees native to this country have been collected, and microscopic slides made showing radial, tangential, and cross sections. ‘These have been studied and analyzed and a key constructed, by which it is possible to distinguish most commercial species. This key and the slides are in constant use in the identification of samples of wood submitted by organizations A DEcENNIAL REcoRD 33 and individuals outside of the laboratory, as well as for routine identi- fication within the organization. In the Use of Wood for Pulp and Paper One of the most comprehensive investigations completed by the laboratory is the one on the grinding of wood for mechanical pulp, which was conducted in a full size experimental ground-wood mill especially constructed for the purpose at Wausau, Wisconsin. This study brought out the fundamental principles underlying the grinding process and the effect of certain variables such as press- ure, speed and quality of grinding surface upon the quality and amount of pulp. The effect of preliminary steaming of the wood upon the pulp was determined for a number of species, and the suitability for mechanical pulp of a large number of American woods was deter- mined. In fact, experiments were carried out on all species which seemed to have any possibilities whatever; it being the intention to make the study so nearly complete that no further work would have to be done upon grinding for many years to come. Studies of similar breadth and scope have been under way for many years in the production of chemical pulps from American woods. Two principal objects have been aimed at, viz., to determine the funda- mental cooking or pulping conditions underlying each of the three principal chemical processes (sulphite, sulphate and soda), and to determine the suitability of the individual species for the production of pulp by the process or processes to which it is adapted. These studies were not quite completed when war activities made it necessary to abandon them for the time being. They have since, however, been finished and the results made available. Most paper is bought and sold upon specification, and the speci- fication usually has some provision concerning the physical properties. Methods of determining these properties have been very unsatisfac- tory, however, and knowledge concerning the subject lacking. A special testing room in which the atmospheric conditions can be kept constant, has been constructed and series of tests made to develop the inter-relationship among the various physical properties and to im- prove methods of test. The effect of atmospheric moisture upon the strength of paper has been determined, and several new methods of test perfected. 34 THE Forrest Propucts LABORATORY In connection with the investigations into the fundamentals of the chemical pulping processes, attention has been directed to the im- provement of the processes in their various details. Typical of the improvements worked out is the impregnation of the chips with cook- ing liquor before starting the cook. This is applicable to the sulphate and soda processes and produces more uniform cooking and increased yields of pulp, at the same time reducing the cooking period and the steam consumption. ‘The commercial trials of this improvement were successfully completed shortly before the declaration of war. There are many problems in the specialty fields which could be solved if time and funds were available. On some of these the labora- tory has worked as occasion arose. In connection with the utilization of waste hemlock bark from pulpwood, a new use for spent tanbark presented itself, and experiments were undertaken to determine its commercial value. As a direct result of this work, a number of companies began the use of a certain percentage of spent tanbark in the manufacture of roofing felts, in place of cotton rag stock. This produced a new market and exercised a stabilizing effect upon the cotton rag market, which had begun to skyrocket. In the Derived Products of Wood The hardwood distillation industry is one of the older wood- utilizing industries, and has gradually developed to its present state largely without the aid of organized research. ‘The laboratory under- took a series of experiments to determine the fundamentals of the process and found that proper control of the temperature in the re- torts during distillation produced decided increases in the yield of valuable products without increasing the time required. ‘This im- provement has been rapidly adopted by the industry. Beech, birch, and maple have always been considered the standard woods for distillation, and only a very small percentage of other woods was used. As part of its distillation studies, the laboratory deter- mined the value of a number of other hardwoods such as oaks and chestnut, and demonstrated that the vields from several were sufficient to warrant commercial exploitation. Several plants have recently been erected to distill these substitute woods exclusively. A DEcCENNIAL REcORD 35 A number of demonstration experiments have been made in cooperation with the Bureau of Mines to show the value of certain tars and oils, products of both hardwood and softwood distillation, as agents in the flotation process of ore separation. Several of these distillation products have proved themselves well adapted for this purpose, and have assumed definite commercial value, instead of being merely waste by-products. Certain perculiar properties of wood turpentine, not possessed by gum turpentine, created a prejudice against it and retarded its sale. The laboratory made a very complete study of wood turpentine, in- cluding methods of analysis, methods of refining, chemical composi- tion, and commercial value, and through this study assisted in obtain- ing proper markets for it. To assist in the development of efficient utilization of softwood sawdust and similar waste wood, the laboratory has carried out de- tailed fundamental efficiency studies on the process for obtaining ethyl alcohol from wood. ‘These studies have determined the best operating conditions and the amounts of alcohol which can be obtained from various species of wood. Special research in the fermentation of the sugars—one step in the process—has resulted in a decided in- crease in the yields of alcohol commercially produced. In this same connection, investigations have been carried out on the fermentation procedures for the fermentation of sugars contained in waste sulphite liquors. This waste is produced in vast quantities in sulphite process pulp plants of the country, and the investigations established a means of increasing the yields of ethyl (grain) alcohol obtainable from the waste material. Basie underlying data on the chemical composition of wood and on the effect of varying chemical composition on the physical and me- chanical properties have been entirely lacking; methods for making the chemical analysis have not even been completely developed. The laboratory has made a fair start on this work, and has made progress in the refinement of methods of analysis. ‘The analysis of several species of wood has been completed. Conclusion This, in brief, outlines the major fields of work done by the laboratory during the first years of its existence. The formative HNIHOVW ONILSHL V NI GHOVId ONIHNG AIY DNIM ANVIdULY NV—MUOM UVM A DEcENNIAL RECORD 37 period can definitely be said to have been passed. ‘The work in wood products research had been clearly defined and many plainly blazed trails had been opened through this little traveled field by the time the world war assumed for the United States a more critical aspect. Before the war was over, these trails were widened to broad highways over which traveled many agencies and interests that sought the help of this institution in solving problems vital to the welfare of nations. War Work The declaration of war on April 6, 1917, found the laboratory with a fund of basic information on wood and wood products, well- developed apparatus and equipment for research and a small but well-organized staff numbering among its members men with nation- wide reputations in their individual lines of research. Better still, the personnel, largely composed of those who had seen the birth of the laboratory or helped in its early growth, was possessed of a sense of partnership in true pioneer work, and of a spirit that stands out as one of the real assets of the institution in the time of stress that marked the opening of the war. It was this spirit that contributed largely to whatever measure of success may have been achieved later, for it kept the force largely intact despite the material gain or increase in per- sonal prestige that awaited in so many other fields, military or civilian, at that time. Without this loyal nucleus the usefulness of the labora- tory to many war agencies would have been much limited. The entire energy of the whole organization was at once devoted to the most efficient use of its knowledge and facilities in the prosecu- tion of the war. A careful survey immediately showed that the labora- tory’s help would be needed in the solution of a great many problems confronting these departments. A general list of problems was drawn up, and steps taken to get into contact with the proper agencies and to start the various researches which were plainly needed. This survey of forest products needs in relation to national defense served to bring out with startling clearness the vast impor- tance of wood and other forest products in warfare. Wood in the form of lumber, timber, ties, posts, poles, piling, etc., must be supplied for uses similar to those prevailing during times of peace, such as for buildings (barracks-cantonments), railroads, bridges, telephone and 38 THe Forest Propucrs LABoratory telegraph lines, docks, ships, boxes and crates, furniture, fuel, and a multitude of other uses normally associated with modern commerce and industry. Then there were the multitudinous special war uses of wood in the building of airplanes, trucks, artillery wheels, and escort wagons, as well as for gunstocks, handles of trench tools, mortar boxes, and posts for entanglements, to mention but a few. In the building of trenches, essentially a mining operation, there were required in the last war millions of feet of lumber to mantain these works and make them habitable. For most of these uses experience has found no other mate- rial to substitute for wood. In war time the demand for wood pulp jumps tremendously, largely through the increased demand for paper. For instance, in France, despite the suspension of many journals the number of copies of papers issued daily jumped 100 per cent over peace times. Wood pulp, in the emergency, in the blockaded central European countries assumed vast importance in the manufacture of explosives, as a sub- stitute in surgery for absorbent cotton dressings, in the making of textiles and clothing. As one German editor expressed it fervently, “'To be without wood is almost as bad as being without bread.” The chemical aspects of the wood situation likewise play a tre- mendously important part in the game of the nations—distillation products, for instance,—methy] alcohol and its important part in the making of medicines and disinfectants, in the manufacture of dyes and other products; acetic acid; the turpentines and resins. These need merely be named to conjure up the impossibility of carrying on important functions connected with modern warfare lacking ample supplies of these products derived from wood. Personnel and Financial Situation In addition to establishing contact with the various war agencies and getting under way the most urgent researches, plans were imme- diately undertaken for the expansion of the organization to meet the greatly increased demands which it was evident would be made upon it, and for providing the necessary funds and the additional labora- tory space. The demand for the facilities of the laboratory at once raised a critical financial situation that needed solution before expansion could A DEcENNIAL REcoRD 39 be authorized. While the very limited appropriation for the regular staff could be devoted to war time work, the amount was fixed. Rec- ognition of the situation by the Forest Service resulted in transferring small amounts of money created by adjustment of work in other fields and also in the sending of experienced personnel to assist in the en- larged program. Despite these adjustments, but little progress could have been made without the allotment of funds from the various co- operating bureaus in the Army and Navy departments. From these sources came the bulk of the funds used for carrying on the important war program. Additional space, as needed, was made available through the patriotic cooperation of the University of Wisconsin, a number of whose buildings, in whole or part, were vacated and turned over to the laboratory during the period of the war. NAMES ON ROLL PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENTS AT THE LABORATORY—JULY 1917 TO JULY 1920 Of the many difficulties encountered in carrying on the necessary work, the matter of personnel was ever present. The dearth of prop- erly trained men who could be secured at the comparatively low sal- aries which the laboratory was able to pay was always most acute, and was largely responsible for many irksome delays in expanding the organization. This expansion went forward, however, at a reasonable 40 THe Forest Propucts LABORATORY rate, and on armistice day the entire force numbered 458 persons. After that time, the personnel was gradually reduced, and much of the emergency work dropped. However, certain of the projects, espe- cially those of importance in peace-time developments, have been continued, support for them being largely furnished by the cooperat- ing bureaus. The war expansion and the relative personnel situation today and in 1917, prior to the sudden growth of the laboratory, can be seen at a glance in the diagram on page 39. Kiln Drying of Aircraft Woods In presenting the accomplishments of the laboratory during the war period, it will be necessary to include a certain amount of back- ground, so that each research may be properly oriented and fitted into the general plan of national defense. The very essence of this work was the necessity for the development of unprecedented supplies of spruce for aircraft production and research. ‘The demands of the allied nations for aircraft materials in the years preceding the entry of the United States into the war had practically cleaned up the avail- able supply of air-dry spruce in the country and in addition, the pro- duction of green spruce was entirely inadequate; though even had it been sufficient, the delay incident to air drying would have been pro- hibitive. The only alternative was kiln drying. Utilizing the available knowledge possessed by the laboratory in this field, the proper authori- ties were convinced of the practicability of kiln drying material green from the saw to a condition equal to or better than air-dried stock. The preparation of kiln-drying specifications covering the principal aircraft woods followed and they were almost immediately approved by the Signal Corps and became the standard for both Army and Navy. Under these specifications it was possible to dry three-inch green spruce planks in 21 days, ordinary air seasoning taking from six months to a year, depending upon climatic conditions. Batteries of suitable kilns were erected by the Army and Navy for the drying of aircraft woods, the largest of these being at Vaucouver Barracks, Washington. In the erection and operation of this large drying plant considerable technical advice and assistance was rendered by the lab- oratory. Several aircraft manufacturers also installed similar kilns A. DECENNIAL RECORD 41 or kilns based on laboratory ideas with modifications to suit particular conditions in their product. The drying schedules embodied in this specification were consid- ered perfectly practical and safe from the standpoint of the strength of the wood; however, it seemed desirable, especially in the case of various woods which were being considered as substitutes for spruce and for mahogany and walnut (for propellers), to secure additional data on the effect of various drying schedules, including those specified, upon the mechanical properties of the wood. These data were in- tended to determine the limits, as to drying schedules, which could not be exceeded with safety, it being advantageous, of course, to dry the stock as rapidly as permissible. Therefore, a comprehensive pro- gram of drying and testing was initiated. Thousands of strength tests were made upon carefully matched specimens, green, air-dried, and kiln-dried, and the effect of the drying upon the strength determined by analysis of the data. Work on Design of Aircraft Parts There was immediate demand for accurate strength figures for woods used in aircraft design, and it was possible to supply much of this information from data on hand. Pt —) a ere : mt oe a yes os ape 9 ie * Eas nl PARE it TIVINNGOWG AAL DNIVAG INAWOW LAINO V A DercENNIAL RECORD THE DECENNIAL The culmination of the first ten vears of the life of the laboratory came with the Decennial Celebration on July 22 and 23, 1920, at Madison, Wisconsin. That the ten years was fruitful of no small measure of service and establishment of good will among those whom the lab- oratory was intended to serve is shown by the registra- tion during the two days’ festivities, which were attended by 269 visitors from 22 states and Canada and Porto Rico. Largely drawn from the nation’s wood-using and forest and lumbering interests, these representative business men and friends were given opportunity to study the development of the laboratory as it stands today in physical equipment and facilities for future service. On the part of the laboratory, it was the laying of a new foundation stone for the erection of a greater laboratory, the gaining of inspiration to press on to the making of a new ten-year record. Service to the wood- using industries of the country indirectly, and primarily the extension of the usefulness of America’s forests, so vital to the welfare of our present standard of civiliza- tion, were the keynotes of the decennial. The program and proceedings of the celebration follow. 86 Tue Forrest Propucts LABORATORY PROGRAM OF THE DECENNIAL CELEBRATION FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY Thursday, July 22, 1920 REGISTRATION Headquarters have been established at the Park Hotel on Capitol Square and all are requested to go there for room reservations, registration, banquet tickets, train schedules and other information. 10:30 a. M. GENERAL ASSEMBLY Agricultural Hall, University of Wisconsin H. F. Weiss, Chairman, Consulting Engineer, C. F. Burgess Laboratories and Former Director, Forest Products Laboratory. *“LEGISLATIVE MEASURES FOR ForREST CONSERVATION” The Honorable Emanuel L. Philipp, Governor of Wis- consin. “TRANSLATING KNOWLEDGE INTO POWER” EK. A. Birge, LL.D., S.C.E., President of the Univer- sity of Wisconsin. “Tue Forest Propucts LABORATORY” C. P. Winslow, Director, Forest Products Laboratory. 12:00 Noon LUNCHEON Gymnasium, University of Wisconsin 1:00 rp. mM. INSPECTION OF THE ForEst PRropucts LABORATORY (Report at the main building of the laboratory on Uni- versity Avenue and join a party with a guide.) The Home Economics Department of the University of Wisconsin will hold a special demonstration for the bene- fit of visiting ladies. A DEcCENNIAL REcoRD 87 4:00 P.M. RECREATION Automobile tour of the city, boating and swimming. 7:00 P.M. BANQUET Gymnasium, University of Wisconsin Burr W. Jones, LL.D., Toastmaster. “FORESTS AND NATIONAL PROSPERITY” Lieutenant-Colonel W. B. Greeley, Forester, Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture. “SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND THE SUBMARINE DETECTOR” Illustrated talk by Prof. Max Mason, Research Special- ist of the National Research Council. Friday, July 23, 1920 10:00 A.M. GENERAL ASSEMBLY Agricultural Hall, University of Wisconsin John Foley, Chairman, Forester, Pennsylvania Railway System. “SomME PROBLEMS OF THE Pup AND Paper InpustTRY”’ D. C. Everest, Secretary and General Manager, Mara- thon Paper Mills Company. “AMERICA’S PLACE IN INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH” H. EK. Howe, Chairman, Research Extension Division, National Research Council. “SoME PROBLEMS OF THE LUMBER INDUSTRY” W. A. Gilchrist, Member of the Forestry Committee, National Lumber Manufacturers’ Association. 12:00 Noon LUNCHEON Gymnasium, University of Wisconsin 88 Tuer Forrest Propucts LABORATORY ADJOURNMENT SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENTS A Wood-Using Industries Conference on a National Forestry Policy will be held on July 23 at 2:00 p. m. in Agricultural Hall, Uni- versity of Wisconsin. All are invited to attend this conference. A meeting of the Executive Committee of the American Wood Preservers’ Association will be held on the afternoon of July 22. Deans of Forestry and Engineering Schools will meet the morn- ing of July 24 to consider a curriculum for Forest Engineers. There will be a meeting of the Inter-regional Technical Commuit- tee of the National Lumber Manufacturers’ Association on the morn- ing of July 24. The Venetian Night Regatta of the University of Wisconsin will be held at the foot of Park street on Lake Mendota on the afternoon and evening of July 23. This is a gala event. A DECENNIAL REcOoRD 89 FOREST PRODUCTS LABORATORY DECENNIAL CELEBRATION INTRODUCTORY SPEECH H. F. Weiss, Chairman Friends of the Forest Products Laboratory: Ten years ago the state of Wisconsin, through its university, entered into a cooperative agreement with the Federal Government through its Forest Service to establish an institution for studying the properties of one of our country’s great natural resources, namely, timber. We are assembled here today to celebrate the first ten years of work of this institution, to take an inventory of what has been accom- plished, and to interchange views in reference to developing plans for a bigger and better future. I think in these days of high taxes, which may go even higher, it is well for all of us to become much better ac- quainted with our Government, to know what our Government is doing for us. The tendency of the time, I think, particularly on the part of Government and industry, is for these two to work too much apart, this being due largely to a lack of familiarity with each other. I be- lieve it is particularly necessary for the Government and the indus- tries to cooperate more whole-heartedly if our country is to play a prominent part in the commerce of the world. In the Forest Products Laboratory the Government has established an institution which is doing much direct good for all of the wood-using industries and indi- rectly is doing good for all of us, because all of us use wood in some form or other. On behalf of the Celebration Committee I want to thank each and everyone of you for coming here and for the splendid and loyal support which you have given. Without your support this celebration could not have been held. It now gives me great pleasure to present the man who stands at the head of the great commonwealth of Wisconsin, which has done so much to make this work in studying forest products a successful real- ity-—Governor Philipp. 90 THE Forest Propucts LABORATORY “LEGISLATIVE MEASURES FOR FOREST CONSERVATION” Emanuel L. Philipp, Governor of Wisconsin Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen: In behalf of the state I want to bid you welcome, particularly those of you who have come from other states and from other sections of this state to this meeting. It is an important meeting in many ways and one which will result, [ am sure, in some good. I welcome you to this great university, the capital, and our state in general; and I hope that when you leave here the people and the surroundings that you have been in will leave a good and lasting impression upon you. To me has been assigned the subject of “Legislative Measures for Forest Conservation”. Before I attempt to speak upon that subject, however, I am going to review briefly what I believe to be the waste of forest materials during the nineteenth century. I do this because I was reared in the state of Wisconsin; I knew something of the timber supply of earlier days; I have been a lumberman, and I am going to speak to you from the lumberman’s standpoint, not only of the waste in Wisconsin, but of the waste that we have seen in other states, par- ticularly in the South, and the new conditions and the better under- standing that the people no whave of timber values since they began to see it disappear. I think that would better illustrate the necessity of legislation for timber conservation than mere legislative discussion of the subject. The state of Wisconsin, as you all know, had a great timber supply. I think back to the sixties when men went to the northern pineries, bought forty acres of land, and cut around that forty acres for three or four years. That was a common custom. ‘There was so much timber in northern Wisconsin that it was the general belief among our citizens that the supply was inexhaustible. To that sup- ply was added the then only partially-known supply of northern Min- nesota and the great supply in the state of Michigan. ‘There was so much timber to be had and lumber was necessarily so cheap that only the very best qualities could be used and sold for a very common and A DeEcENNIAL REcorD 91 ordinary purpose. I recall the time out here on the Wisconsin river, where I lived as a small boy, when 1x6x16 fencing had to be free of knots. A farmer would not accept a fence board, a cork pine fence board, that had a knot in it; bridge plank had to be practically clear; and so it was with all the lumber that was used at that time. You of younger years who have probably had something to do with the wreck- ing of old houses have learned that the “piece-stuff”, so called among lumbermen, used in those days was practically clear material. Now, every lumberman knows that when you can sell only clear lumber there is a tremendous waste that must be left either at the sawmill or in the forest. I want to say at the outset, without any thought of criticising nature, that nature would have been a great conservator of forest products if she had permitted trees to grow square rather than round, because the fact that the jog had to be square was one of the reasons for great waste in those early days. ‘There was no thought of making anything of slabs, and the slab burners of the country have been a great enemy of conservation. I do not know, nor does anyone know, how many billions, aye, countless billions, of good material have gone up in the form of heat and smoke through the slab burner, a perfectly innocent apparatus, so far as that is concerned. I attribute the loss, not to the apparatus itself, but to the market conditions. That part of the log was burned because there was no market for it, and the lum- berman was compelled to make whatever the people would buy. Now, the waste has gone on not only in pine and softwoods but in the hardwoods as well. I had some experience in the south as a lumberman in the manufacture of hardwood, and I am going to give you a brief review of what I saw there and of what is going on not only now, but as far back as the nineties. Prior to the entry of the sawmill in the southern forests, there had been a system of timber destruction going on in the South, particularly of the very choicest white oak, that I thought was a reflection upon this Government. Large crews of men in these southern forests were in the business of making what is known as pipe staves. The staves were 60 inches long and from 4 to 6 inches wide, and could be made only of the very best quality of white oak that had a perfectly straight grain. When- ever they found a tree with a winding grain they had to leave it, be- cause they could not use a crooked stick. The system was this: They 92 THe Forest Propucts LABORATORY made arrangements with the owner, paying, as a rule, $2.00 per tree, to cut any tree in the forest that was over 30 inches in diameter—I may say any white oak tree. ‘They cut it, and cut off the first bolt. If it did not split perfectly straight, they went away and left the tree to rot in the forest. By that system no doubt billions of feet of splendid white oak were left to waste in the woods. Every sawmill today util- izes the tree up to the point where the large limbs ‘appear, or as far into the top as you can possibly use it to make a board of any kind. Now, they took out of the forests of the South the most beautiful, the best, clear white oak, which today would be worth countless millions of dollars, and which they sold for $2.00 a tree. I don’t know what one would have to pay today if one went out to buy it. Gum as far back as 1900 had practically no value. I started a sawmill in the Yazoo Delta in 1892. I sawed enough so-called red gum to build our plant and our tramways, and I sawed possibly 100,000 feet more than we actually needed. I though I could sell it. I could not give it away. Finally I sold it to the planters for $1.00 a load to get it out of the yard. ‘The same may be said of white ash. There was a splendid growth of what was commonly known as cane ash. It was slaughtered for one purpose or another and was sold or practically given away. It was used largely for mechanical purposes and would be a valuable timber if we had it today. The history of hickory is rather interesting to the lumberman. IT remember when southern hickory with the wide, broad, redheart, or what we lumbermen used to call shellbark hickory, had no value at all. Everybody. wanted what was called second growth hickory from Indiana and Ohio. About 1900, people’s notions changed in that re- gard, because the supply of hickory was about exhausted. ‘They be- gan to saw and use shellbark hickory; and about this time I imagine the market was glad to take even that kind of hickory. The poplar tree had the same history. As long as poplar was available you could not sell cottonwood at any price. I recall when so-called boxboards sold for $12 per thousand f. 0. b. Memphis. Standing cottonwood was worth 60 cents a thousand. The supply is exhausted. Cottonwood has gone, and now they have come to gum; and it is truly unfortunate that so many countless billion feet of gum, that beautiful, splendid tree, have gone to waste before we began to appreciate its value. The planters of the South destroyed it. They A DEcENNIAL REcorRD 93 girdled it, left it standing for a year or two, and then set it on fire. It was in their way. ‘The timbermen went by, fortunately, where the wood was still standing. The gum tree that was neglected back in the nineties is now being put to practical use and has direct commer- cial value. ‘That was due to the fact that so much timber of a better quality was available during those years, and at a cheaper price, that the people refused to use the poorer qualities of timber at any price whatever. It is unfortunate for the country and unfortunate for the timber supply of the country that there was not some control, even back in the sixties and seventies when the great timber supply was here; that there was not some supervision that compelled the use of what we at that time regarded as the class of timber that had no commercial value for purposes to which it could be put and save the high-grade timber—the timber that we need so much today—for the future. But somehow our forefathers did not foresee it. We will not blame them for it. It is not a nice thing to speak ill of those who went before us. We do not mean it that way, but we can express regret that no form of intelligent supervision was undertaken at that time. I am sure that many billions of dollars’ worth of beautiful timber that was slaughtered for nothing might have been saved for the benefit of future generations. We have reached the point now where we appreciate that. I believe that all thinking men appreciate the fact that the question of a timber supply for the future has resolved itself into a serious propo- sition. It is true that we are using now what we left in years gone by. We are using now even the despised hemlock that you could not give away in the early days. Nobody would look at it. It was not good building material in the past. It may be the best we have now, but, compared with what we used to have, it is not good; nevertheless, we have to-use it. That is becoming exhausted, however, little by little, and in the course of time the hemlock will be in the same situation that the cork pine was in, a magnificent supply when we started, but completely exhausted. Now, what shall we use as a substitute for hemlock? I do not know. We shall have to find some ornery tree that we would not use in the past and do not care for now, but it will answer the purpose and will look better when we need it. 94 THe Forrest Propucrs LABORATORY How much more could be said upon the question of the timber that has disappeared. Let us consider walnut, if you please, for a while. ‘There was a time, as most of you know, several older people tell us and younger people have read it, that they built rail fences in Indiana and Ohio of walnut. Now they are digging out the stumps of what was left, veneering it for covering for pianos and beautiful furniture. The walnut log is about as scarce as a gold mine now. There is very little left indeed. There is a small supply left in Okla- homa that is so far away from transportation that one could not afford to handle it. White oak is becoming very scarce. I had in my day a wide experience in the manufacture of white oak, and I felt that I was quite conversant with the supply throughout the United States. I made a study of it at that time. A man might offer me any price today that he chooses in asking me to furnish a sawmill where I could supply him with, say 100,000,000 feet of white oak in the next ten years; I should have to tell him frankly, I would not know where to go. By white oak I mean the kind that can be used for finish, the kind that we used to regard as merchantable white oak during the days when we actually had a supply. Now there enters into this question the tie supply for railroads. There is still quite a lot of white oak available along the Ohio river. some in the mountains of Tennessee, some in the state of Mississippi; and as you go on through the South you will find a little patch of white oak here and there that the planter has refused to cut down because of some sentiment connected with it or because he wanted to keep it for ornamental purposes. You will find in Arkansas little patches and stands of timber that the lumberman has gone through which he left because the trees could not be used for ties and merchant- able timber. Vast quantities of ties in this country are bemg made of hemlock and other softwoods, and the railroads are getting along with what years ago they thought they could not use. The hemlock is going and so are the other woods that they are using, and finally some other material must be substituted. But to get at what I was asked to speak about. What are we going to do to better conserve our forests, our timber supply; and what kind of legislation should be enacted to do that? The people of this country are not agreed upon this subject. In fact, it is one of our peculiarities that we are never quite agreed upon any subject, A DeEcENNIAL ReEcorD 95 and there was never greater evidence of that than now. However, this state has had some experience in reforesting. We have attempted, and we have made an honest attempt, to replant some of our cut-over timberlands. Now, I have this to say about it. As a state policy it is not a possible thing today. The cost of the land, the cost of planting, the cost of the care that the plant needs, the taxes that the state loses provided it reserves this land for forestry purposes, make the price, if we compute it up to the time that the trees might have become merchantable, so high as to make it an impracticable thing. Nor is it, in my Judgment, a state duty. Let us assume that the state of Wisconsin would plant in the northern part of our state a million acres of young pine. I do not know what it would cost to do it, nor does anyone else know. The best we could do is to make an estimate which would be liable to be wrong, but we would have to wait at least 50 years before we could get any merchantable timber. Now. when that timber comes into the market it is not for the state of Wisconsin alone. If it were, it would not be a supply for the country, and what we need is a supply for the whole nation. So, then, those who agitate that the state ought to undertake reforestation would do it upon the basis that it is a state duty merely because we at one time had a forest, and that these states that at one time had forests should now undertake this great business proposition, this great speculative investment, in order that the whole country might have a timber supply. That does not appeal to me. It is not a state duty, it is a national duty. The national government should recognize it promptly and take hold of the future supply in an efficient manner. The timber supply of the future, the one which is produced, should be the supply of the entire country, and whatever it costs should be the expenditure of all of the people. There are many states in the Union that have never had any forests. Why should they come in on a timber supply that costs them nothing? No private citizen, I am sure, would like to invest his money in an enterprise that could not possibly, under the most favorable circum- stances, give him any returns in less than 50 years. If we go into national production of hardwoods, why, we have to wait perhaps as much as 100 years. In my experience as a lumberman I cut an oak tree in Missis- sippi that was 76 inches in diameter, 52 feet to the first limb. It had 96 THe Forrest Propucts LABORATORY 352 rings, and if we assume that each ring represents a year’s growth, and no one has been willing to say that it represents any less than one year, then the minimum age of that tree was 352 years. That would have been a long time investment. So it would be with the hardwoods we plant; and it is not for the state of Wisconsin alone to wait, but the nation should wait. It can afford to because it is for the general good. Now, I would recommend to Congress, if I were to recommend anything and they were willing to listen, that they provide for the purpose millions of acres of land, not merely cut-over lands, not merely land that produces perhaps scrubby timber, whatever kind it is, but some good agricultural land with it that will produce the hard- woods. We all know, who have had experience in the forest, that the oak and ash and the other hardwood timbers that we must have for mechanical purposes are not going to grow on a sand heap. ‘They need good soil. ‘The nation must sacrifice some good agricultural soil if it proposes to be a successful timber raiser. ‘The government should provide the land and set it aside for that particular purpose. It should firmly stand against the demands of the agriculturist and say to the people that this land must be used for this particular pur- pose, that it is Just as important to raise this crop as any other crop. It should be the rule in the future that whenever a tree is cut down a tree should be planted in its place, and that another tree be planted wherever there is room to produce one. And then we must look after the crop of trees. We must protect it against destruction by fire, against trespassers, etc. Unless we go into the problem in an intelligent and practical way, of course, the whole project will be a failure. So then, those of us who are interested in the reproduction of the forest, and who appre- ciate that we must begin it now, ought to do our work not in the States, because I think it is useless, but go to the halls of Congress and im- press Congress with the importance of this work. The lumbermen of this country, perhaps, have the best conception of the value of timber and its fast disappearance. As an organization interested in replacing what they have cut down, interested in putting back the trees they have taken to the mill and sawed into lumber, they should go to Congress and impress Congress with the importance of the subject, in order to get the necessary appropriation and the nec- A DEcCENNIAL ReEcorRD 97 essary legislation to go into this question of reproducing our forests in an intelligent way. Unless we do that we shall soon be out of timber. Talk about reforesting the arid lands of the West! Now, fellow citizens, I do not know all about that, but it does seem to me that a section of the country or a land that never produced anything more than a little scrub sugar pine will never produce anything else. If the country must wait for that kind of timber culture, I am afraid we will find ourselves very much out of lumber in the future. That type of land which does not produce anything left to itself, where nature has not planted the seed and produced it, that is not going to do any- thing under cultivation. It has no moisture, and there is nothing in the soil that will make it grow. It is so in our own state. We have sections here in Wisconsin that never raised good timber. There is nothing substantial in the soil to support the tree. It raises scrub stuff, scrub pine, Jack pine, and other pines of that variety. You must wait 50 years for that. So we must make up our minds that we must set aside soil that has substance enough in it to support a tree; otherwise we cannot have it. I want to say in conclusion that I fully approve and have been in great sympathy with the work of the Forest Products Laboratory. Its business has been to find new uses for timber that heretofore have not been considered satisfactory for any particular use. It has ren- dered a great service in that respect. It has also found many ways to use what was heretofore regarded as absolute waste around and about the sawmill. It was high time that somebody devoted some time to that, and in that respect whatever they have accomplished has been of real use. We must conserve, if you please, everything there is in a tree that can be used. You cannot throw away a six inch slab; you have got to make some use of it. They say of the packer that he makes use of every part of the hog excepting the squeal. We must make use of every part of the tree excepting the noise it makes when it falls. There must be a real spirit of conservation produced among our people; they should be able and willing to use everything that is usable. The timber of today ought to be cut and used with reference to the use that it is to be put to. We should under no circumstances be permitted to use a good pine board, for instance, for a meat box that renders serv- 98 THE Forest Propucts LABORATORY ice but once and then goes into the furnace. ‘That should no longer be permitted. Whether we can do that, whether we can regulate our lumber supply to that extent, I can not say, but it would be a right step towards conservation. You know what we really need some- times is a king; we need a lumber king anyway, a man who could tell the people to do with what they have and compel them to doit. If we had that privilege we could conserve what we have. I thank you for your time and I trust you will have a pleasant visit. Remarks by the Charman, Mr. H. F. Weiss, Following Governor Philipp’s Speech I venture to say that you gentlemen who are from our sister states wish you could have a Governor who understands the forestry program and problems as well as our Governor. That is just the way we do things in Wisconsin. (Applause.) Governor Philipp, I thank you for your splendid talk. In connection with every business organization there are two words used which I have seldom, if ever, seen applied to an educational in- stitution. They are “quality” and “‘service’. You gentlemen who are engaged in business know full well to what I refer. The hours that you have spent and are spending in improving the quality of your product and the splendid service which your company renders are things which you are interested in. If these terms were to be applied to an educational institution, I know of none which lay better claims to them than the University of Wisconsin. The high quality of the University’s work is reflected not only in the faculty and its teachers, but in the great student body which it sends out every year. The high ideals of the University are not locked up in the text books nor in the class rooms, but in this State they reach out to the shop, to the factory, and to the legislature. I think one of the biggest surprises of my life was when I first came to Wisconsin from my old home in New Jersey and saw farmers of fifty or more years of age walking down the streets of Madison with a text book under their arms, studying agriculture. This variety of farmer was totally unknown to me, and was not existent in the range bounded by the State of New Jersey. Through my years of A DeECENNIAL REcORD 99 living here it has been very evident to me why the Wisconsin farmer is able to make his farm pay while my old farmer friends in New Jersey are still paying for the mortgage on their farms. I think the Forest Products Laboratory is particularly fortunate in being identified with such an institution as the University of Wis- consin, because it furnishes an inspiring example of not only how to gain knowledge, but, of what is of equally great importance, how to apply that knowledge. It gives me great pleasure to present to you the man who stands at the head of this great seat of learning—President Birge. DNILVYO AGNVY ONIXOd GNV ‘DNIAUC NIIM NI NOILLOOULSNI dou SHAILVINASHUdHU UNAS AAVH SWUIA AO SHUOOS—DNIAUC NIIM NI SSVIO IVOIdAL—MUOM TVNOILVONaH A DeEcENNIAL REcoRD 101 TRANSLATING KNOWLEDGE INTO POWER IY. A. Birge, President of the University of Wisconsin Mr. Weiss and Members of this Convention: I suppose that I have been asked to speak here in two capacities. In the first place, I address you as a representative of the University, whose guests you are in some sense today, since you are meeting with us in the University College of Agriculture. We meet to celebrate the completion of the first ten vears of the life of an institution which was established by the government of the United States in coopera- tion with the State and the University of Wisconsin. It is an insti- tution to whose prosperity and work this State has continued to make contributions, small, indeed almost negligible, in comparison to the total budget of the institution, negligible in comparison to that con- tribution of the United States government. Nevertheless, they have been contributions which carried with them the hearty good will of the State and of the University. And we hope that we have also contrib- uted something of the spiritual aid and fellowship which a university can give to an institution of research. We, ourselves, have received much from the presence of the laboratory with us, and we hope that we have been able, in our turn, to give something to it. So I welcome you, as representing an institution of the type which ought to gather about universities, carrying on work of a kind which is represented within the university as well as in its associated institutions. I wel- come you with especial warmth as you are present here to celebrate a decade of distinguished success in services and investigations so fundamental to the advance of the science and art of forestry. In the second place I am here to speak on the subject assigned to me by Mr. Weiss and Mr. Winslow—Translating Knowledge Into Power. You have just had a most vivid sketch of the history of the lumber resources of the country and of their present situation from Governor Philipp, who speaks to you not only from the point of view of a statesman, but also from the point of view of one who has spent years in the industry that you represent. You will hear, after I have talked to you, a vivid presentation of the Forest Products Laboratory 102 THE Forest Propucts Laporatrory itself and its specific work from its director, Mr. Winslow. So, if I interpret rightly the subject assigned to me, I am expected to sand- wich, as it were, between these two vivid and interesting stories a little of what might perhaps be called “highbrow stuff’, a little of that sort of talk which is supposed to belong to the traditional university. When Governor Philipp was telling us the story of lumber, he spoke of the indifference of the last generation to the situation with which we are now confronted. It is easy for us now to see that our parents were blind to conditions which the future was sure to bring. I do not believe that we should criticize them too severely for this blindness, for I suppose that our descendants, fifty or a hundred years hence, will look back to us and will wonder at our blindness just as we wonder at the ignorance of our fore-fathers. However blind they may have been, they were not without excuse, for the conditions under which they lived were wholly new in the history of the world. No pre- ceding century ever saw a growth of population in the least compara- ble with that of the 19th century in Western Europe, and especially in our own country. And still more, no preceding century saw that rapid increase of drafts on natural resources which was characteristic of the 19th century, and especially of its later years. If, therefore, our fathers did not foresee the future, it was because the story of the past by which alone they could conjecture the conditions of the future, did not enable them to foresee them; and we ought, therefore, not to blame them for ignorance. We, however, are in a totally different position, and if we do not foresee and provide for the future it will not be because of ignorance, but because of indifference and slothfulness. In our use of forest products we have been drawing on the balance of resources which has accumulated during the remote past. We can now see very plainly that in no long time this balance will be exhausted, and that if we draw a check on nature’s bank, it will be returned to us promptly marked “No funds”. The western world has never been in this situation before. It is a wholly new thing that a great people like ours should be face to face with the situation that it must depend for its supply of wood upon the annual growth. It is a new thing that a people should be placed in a position where the annual growth of tim- ber will be the substantial limit of the amount which that people can use. A DEcENNIAL REcOoRD 103 This situation is not confined to the forest products. In all of those resources which are produced by the earth the same situation is arising or has already come to pass. We can not easily increase the area of productive land or of utilizable water. We must make the annual production of land and water suffice for our needs. As this situation begins to become manifest, we take various measures in order to reduce the depletion of our balance in nature’s bank; in order also to increase the annual production. We put up restrictions, both legal and moral, upon the use of the products of nature. We go still farther and endeavor to increase the annual income of these productions. We set up fish hatcheries; we produce improved varieties of seed so that the net increase of the land and water may be made larger and that there may be a greater amount in this annual contribution of the earth to our support; we try to utilize waste—or what we once regarded as waste; we handle the 1aking of coke so that what were formerly waste products are util- ized; we overhaul the culm bank of the coal mine and we rework the tailings of other mines. In all these ways and in many more we attempt to check the depletion of our natural resources. In the use of forest products we increase our balance, as the Gov- ernor has told us, by employing kinds and varieties and sizes of wood which only a few years ago were regarded as entirely worthless. All of these methods are necessary and right, and they all help to prolong the period during which the balance in nature’s bank may be available tous. They aid also in increasing the annual supply of the products which nature is putting forth for our use; but, as the Governor’s story showed us, these means are inadequate—inadequate in every direction and particularly inadequate in securing a permanent supply of forest products. This raises the particular point which I was asked to talk about this morning. I am asked to call your attention to another great asset, another great resource of a civilized people. which is being used slightly and very imperfectly, which is continually accumulating, which is capable of very great use; out of which will come great saving and great addition to natural resources and a correspondingly great prolongation and advancement of the prosperity of the people. I am speaking of the stock of scientific knowledge which has accumu- lated during, let us say, the past half or three-quarters of a century. 104 THE Forrest Propuctrs LABORATORY Look back at the condition of science in that earlier period to which the Governor referred in his talk about the forests. We cele- brated here in Wisconsin a few weeks ago the fiftieth anniversary of the Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, founded in 1870. We talked about the men who were the fathers of that Academy. 'There was Lapham, a surveyor of Milwaukee; there was Dr. Hoy, a busy phy- sician, in wide practice at Racine. This was the type of man who first brought science to Wisconsin. Fifty years ago, science was mainly in the hands of people busily engaged in other matters; that was true all over this country. Science was a side issue for people whose work and thought were chiefly given to other things. Since that time the situation has changed completely. In those days there were single individuals working at the exploration of nature, many of them doing this as a task for leisure hours; today we have an army of people who are devoting all their time to the exploration of nature and are deriv- ing their living from this work. ‘Thus the knowledge hich these men and women are bringing together, the knowledge which they have been bringing together during the past generation, has been accumu- lating at a rate which one may almost call tremendous. We look with surprise at the rapid increase of population during the past half century; we look with even greater surprise at the enormous increase of wealth during the same period. But neither of these facts is in any way comparable to the increase of scientific knowledge during the same years. Here, then, is an enormous asset which has been grow- ing rapidly, increasing indeed at a geometric rate, and of which by far the greater portion has accumulated during the memory of men here present. It is an asset whose increase is still going on at a rate which is constantly accelerated. 'To this asset there are contributing, not merely a few men, not merely a few great men, but the labors of hun- dreds of thousands of men, working each in his own field of explora- tion. This, then, is a new situation in the history of the world. It has made necessary the development of a new type of profession, of a new type of institution. It has made necessary men and institutions who are to mediate between knowledge in this sense of the word and prac- tical life, between scientific knowledge and affairs. This situation has brought about the establishment of institutions of various types and in various directions. Such are agricultural colleges and experiment A. DEcENNIAL REcorRD 105 stations; such are institutions like the United States Bureau of Stand- ards; and such, also, is this institution in whose honor we meet today— the Forest Products Laboratory. It is noteworthy that these institutions have developed to greater size and in greater number in those relations which have to do with the soil and its products. Here we find the largest number of men whose business it is to take the knowledge which has been accumulated by the explorer of nature and to bring it into direct relation with affairs and with human life. Let me take an illustration from the activities of the department of agriculture and outside of the forestry service. Consider for a moment the student of soils. His work is dependent upon the knowl- edge which has been brought together in past years in the department of chemistry, both organic and inorganic; it depends also on knowl- edge which is embodied in the sciences of bacteriology, of botany, of zoology ; and in addition to these specific sciences he needs the princi- ples which have been wrought out in physics and in many other de- partments. The definite work of the student of soils is the application of knowledge and of principles which have been wrought out else- where. ‘These he takes and applies to the conditions found in the soil. There are two points to be noted in regard to this work. In the first place scientific knowledge can not apply itself, nor can it be directly carried over from laboratory to field. For the conditions under which this knowledge has been wrought out are widely different from those in which it is applied. The student in the laboratory makes his own conditions of experiment, and it is only as he is able to define and to limit the conditions of nature that he is able to secure the results for which he is seeking. But the student of soils must carry this knowledge over into the world of affairs, into the complex situa- tion which nature offers to us. Knowledge must be set to work under nature and therefore under conditions totally different from those of the laboratory. The material conditions of the soil must be consid- ered, the intelligence of those who are working it, and especially the relation of cost and of profit to the processes which are set up. All of these innumerable items which the scientific explorer neglects, and ought to neglect, must be carefully considered by those who are apply- ing knowledge, since they furnish the conditions under which knowl- 106 THE Forrest Propucts LABORATORY edge must be set to work, if it is to produce results that are useful to the people. So it is with the Forest Products Laboratory. It is founded to bridge over the gap which lies between experiment and manufacturer; it must bridge the gap between laboratory and factory; in a word, it must bridge over the great gap which lies between knowledge and life, between knowledge and affairs. And this is not all; for it is not a simple matter to set knowledge at work under the conditions of na- ture. The representative of applied science does not merely take knowledge wrought out by others and put it to work under new con- ditions. The knowledge which is present as science is not stated in the form in which it can be used, since the statement does not take into account the complex conditions under which it is to be set to work. The representative of applied science, therefore, does not merely apply knowledge to new conditions but he translates that knowledge into those new forms in which alone it can be applied. Thus the subject assigned to me is justified. ‘The function of an institution like the Forest Products Laboratory is primarily the trans- lation of knowledge into new terms and into such forms that it can be set to practical work in affairs. Such a translation involves not merely a knowledge of what other people have found out, but involves also scientific study and research itself. It involves, therefore, not merely an application of old knowledge but the development of a new sort of knowledge; the development of knowledge which will work under conditions which are set not only by the tangled web of nature within which it is working, but also by the commercial and social conditions of the men on whom the practical success. of applied science must depend. Thus, as you see, out of the enormous increase of knowledge on the one side, out of the need for its application on the other side, there have arisen professions like those which are represented here today, and finally institutions like the Forest Products Laboratory, in which these professions find a home and an opportunity for service. I will not trouble you with many illustrations. Let me take one or two from the work of the laboratory. It is necessary to find new types of wood and new forms of wood if airplanes are to be quickly and economically constructed. Hence there arises a need for water- proof glue. It would seem at first that such a need could be easily A DEcENNIAL RECORD 107 satisfied. We have only to go into the market and purchase what is offered. But as a matter of fact if such an adhesive is to be developed it will only be after scientific study and research which will bring in the accumulated knowledge from half a dozen sciences, and the men who make that research will need high scientific qualifications on their own part. Only thus can a produce be discovered which is worthy to put before the people and a product on which the people of the coun- try can depend. Or take another problem which arises not only in connection with the manufacture of airplanes but in a hundred directions involving the utilization of wood—the matter of kiln-drying. It seems at first a very easy thing to put wood into a kiln and dry it artificially. Yet you know better than I that the man who goes to work on that principle will rather spoil wood than produce good lumber. It is only as the complex conditions and problems involved in kiln-drying are appre- ciated and thoroughly mastered that success is reached. Only as there are scientifically worked out processes by which the different varieties of wood may be treated, each according to its own kind and condition, can success be secured, even in a process which looks at first so simple. And if in such matters as these, which seem to be simple, scientific study and scientific organization are necessary, much more is the same necessity present in the far more complex problems which are involved in the production of paper pulp, in the prevention of de- cay of timber, in the other infinitely varied uses to which timber is put. I need not give you more illustrations, for these are enough to illustrate the principle which underlies the subject assigned to me— the need of institutions like the Forest Products Laboratory, which shall concern themselves with the translation of knowledge into power and so shall make available for the benefit of the public along specific lines the enormously valuable asset which the world possesses in the accumulated treasures of science. This necessity the government is trying to meet along one line through the Forest Products Laboratory, an institution which medi- ates between knowledge and affairs. I congratulate the laboratory on the way it has performed this duty during the past ten years; I congratulate it for the work which it has done itself; I congratulate it as a part of the great working force of the Department of Agricul- ture; I congratulate it especially on the part which it has taken here 108 THe Forest Propucts LABORATORY in Wisconsin for our benefit as well as for the benefit of other states, on the part which it has taken in the work which our University on its side is trying to do, not only for its own state, but as a part of the national system of education. But [ can not confine what I have to say to a review of the past ten years. Let us look to the future, first looking back to an earlier day. Look back, if you please, to 1876, when the United States cele- brated its first centennial. How did we look at the forest resources of Wisconsin at that time? Now look forward to the next centennial in 1976 and tell me what will be the situation then and what the neces- sity for institutions like the Forest Products Laboratory? We need not indeed look backward and forward so far. Look back less than twenty-five years to the state semi-centennial in 1898 and look forward to the centennial of the state. How have our forests disappeared in less than a quarter of a century; what will be their condition less than thirty years from now, in 1948, in a year when the large majority of those who are here this morning will take part in the centennial cele- bration of the state? Upon what will the prosperity of this state de- pend at a period so short a time ahead of us as thirty years? Will it not be dependent upon the greatly enlarged work and success of insti- tutions—of the Forest Products Laboratory and of other institutions akin to it; and upon the intelligent and vigorous utilization, by the people, of the results that they work out’ The scientific knowledge which has accumulated in the past, and which will accumulate with even greater rapidity during the coming years, must be translated into terms of power by men who make it their profession so to treat knowledge and by institutions which are established for the purpose of setting knowledge to work in affairs. This they must not do in any rule-of-thumb way, not by means of prescriptive rules; but they must convert knowledge into the living and growing contribution of the human mind to the prosperity of the human race; they must translate the knowledge gained by the explorer of nature into. the power of applied science. Remarks by Mr. Weiss Following President Birge’s Speech I hope very much that those of you who have come from out of the city may find it possible to stay in Madison long enough to look A. DEcCENNIAL REcorpD 109 also into the work of the University of Wisconsin and to see for your- selves the way in which the university has been translating its knowl- edge into power along the lines which President Birge has so kindly pointed out to us in his very interesting talk. I do not believe his talk was at all too “highbrow” for the friends of the laboratory, as I am personally acquainted with many of them and know they can grasp it and digest it. I thank you, President Birge. We now come to what I might call the third layer of this sand- wich, as President Birge has pointed it out, and it has been somewhat of a problem for me to know what to say in the way of presenting him. He does not need any introduction. I have not been able to talk about his work or his institution because he is going to do that; and I cannot talk about him personally because I know him too well for that, and, furthermore, it would be rather unfair for me to take ad- vantage of his natural modesty. So, after thinking it over, I have decided I would follow the advice I once saw written on the black- board of our laboratory. It said, “When in deep water keep your mouth shut.” I am now going to state that we will have the pleasure of listening to the man who has worked so loyally and ably to make the Forest Products Laboratory the institution you will see today, and, of course, that refers to none other than C. P. Winslow, best known to all his personal friends as “Cap”. NOILONULSACd OL CHLSHL ONIHd NVA YOOTH dN-LIINA ADUVT V—SLSUL UAAWLL A DeEcCENNIAL RECORD 111 Pan LORE ST PRODUCTS “LABORATORY Carlile P. Winslow, Director, Forest Products Laboratory Mr. Chairman, Ladies and Gentlemen: It affords me a great deal of pleasure—more than I can really well express to you—to extend to you a most cordial and hearty wel- come to this commemoration of the completion of the first ten-vear period of service of the Forest Products Laboratory. I wish particu- larly to express my appreciation of the work and efforts of the Decen- nial Committee which has planned and arranged for this event, to those friends and supporters of the laboratory who by their generous con- tributions have made it possible, and to all of you here who are thus lending your support and encouragement to the organization. I am particularly appreciative of the untiring and effective efforts of the Chairman of the Committee. Mr. Howard F. Weiss, known to all of you in previous days while Director of the Laboratory, and I can only regret that Mr. McGarvey Cline, the first Director of the organization, has found it impossible so to arrange his plans that he could also be here. It was my good fortune to work first under the stimulating guidance of these men when the Forest Products Labora- tory was but a thought, and it is due to their imagination, foresight, and persistence that the laboratory was conceived, organized and put upon an effective working basis. Rudyard Kipling once wrote: “Twelve hundred million men are spread About this Earth, and I and you Wonder, when you and I are dead, What will those luckless millions do?” If we change the closing lines of this stanza to read: “and J and you, Wonder, when all the trees are gone, What will those luckless millions do?” 112 Tue Forrest Propucts LABORATORY —————— the kindly sarcasm of the Kipling humor disappears, and we are con- fronted with a question of vast importance for our consideration and action. The importance of the broad problem would possibly be more sharply recognized if we view the situation from a somewhat less altru- istic and international standpoint and consider only the 100 millon people within the borders of the United States. Consider for a moment the extent to which forest products enter into the comforts, conveniences and pleasures of many, if not all, of this vast multitude of people. You rise in the morning from your wooden bed and walk about on the wooden floor of your wooden home; you bathe with soap probably containing or produced in part with a product from wood, annoint your face with a lotion containing alcohol very likely pro- duced from wood paste, put on your hose manufactured from wood fibre, step into your leather shoes requirmg tannin from wood for their manufacture, and then proceed to breakfast where vou sit upon a wooden chair, in front of a wooden table and read the daily news from a paper made of wood pulp, printed with ink manufactured from a forest product, and received over telegraph lines supported by wooden poles. If reasonably prosperous, you now journey to your office in an automobile with wooden spokes in the wheels, probably travel at least part of the way over a wooden pavement and finally settle yourself in your office surrounded by wooden trimmings and furniture and dig into the daily letters and reports which are again dependent upon the supply of wood pulp paper. If, by chance, you have occasion to travel to Madison to attend the celebration of the Forest Products Laboratory you board a wooden railroad car (or at least one made to appear like wood) and travel over tracks supported by wooden cross-ties. The food which you eat, the clothes which you wear, the materials and supplies necessary for the comforts of your home and the conduct of your business, all are received in containers, some of wood and some of fibre but practically all of forest products. These accustomed comforts and privileges of existence are de- pendent upon a very wide variety of industries, dependent to greater or less degree upon forest products. These supply useful and neces- sary occupation to some million or more people. ‘They include twenty per cent of the 276,000 manufacturing plants in the country. A DEcENNIAL ReEcorRD 113 The future of these varied and tremendous industries is depend- ent upon a supply of raw material—their ultimate and greatest suc- cess dependent upon the wise selection and most efficient handling of this raw material. This means that authentic knowledge of the prop- erties of the material and how to most efficiently utilize them is, in the long run, essential to their continuation on a sound economic basis. These considerations inevitably lead us to the forests, and here again we are confronted with a demand and necessity for knowledge of the properties and possible uses and utilization of the many avail- able species. Without it, it is impossible to know which trees to cut or which to grow, what is their value, how best to utilize them, or what to do with the enormous quantity of waste material. It was such broad conceptions as these that led to the development of the Forest Products Laboratory which was established in 1910 by the Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin. Federal appropria- tions maintain the organization and provide necessary supplies and equipment. The University provides the buildings and light, heat and power, at least within certain limitations. It is a pleasure to be able here to express to the President, Board of Regents and members of the University Faculty my appreciation of the whole-hearted and effective cooperation which has been so generously extended to the laboratory throughout its existence. This was of particualar value and importance during the war emergency period, when the expan- sions in our organization made it necessary to utilize in part or in whole some eight additional University buildings. I wish to make particular acknowledgment to the College of Agriculture, whose buildings were not only largely used by our organization during the war but several of which are still in use for this purpose. The Forest Products Laboratory is called an institution of indus- trial research. Its object is to acquire, disseminate and apply useful knowledge of the properties, uses, and methods of utilization of all forest products. This is a broad field of almost unlimited scope—the surface has, as yet, been but partially scratched. It has been said that research is primarily a matter of men “who work upon the frontiers of knowledge, conquering new domains”. Re- search may be done—as a matter of fact is done—individually, sepa- rately, disconnectedly, and progress of some sort will, undoubtedly, 114 THe Forest Propucts LABORATORY result. But to organize, correlate, co-ordinate and direct such effort must, in the long run, bring greater progress, in less time, with less expense, and greater saving. This has been the guiding thought in the development of the Forest Products Laboratory—the systematic acquiring of useful knowledge that may be transformed into the power that builds up American industries. With the exception of a similar and much smaller institution in Canada, it is the only institution of its sort in existence. However, the importance of such work is becoming gen- erally and, in fact, internationally recognized. ‘The Australian gov- ernment now has under way the development of a forest products laboratory and similar developments are under way by the British government in India, and, to a very limited extent, in South Africa. Former members of our staff have, within the year, left to take up such work in these countries. Norway also has similar plans under devel- opment although they have not, as yet, progressed as far as in Aus- tralia and India. Work of this character requires the services of highly trained specialists along widely varying lines. ‘The forester’s knowledge of tree growth is necessary to the engineer studying the mechanical prop- erties of various trees in order that he may wisely select for study those species which are or may become available for use; the engineer’s knowledge is necessary to the physicist engaged in problems of drying wood in order that the effect of such treatment on the mechanical prop- erties may not be overlooked; the pathologist's knowledge is necessary both to the engineer and physicist in order to determine the effect of decay on the properties under investigation and equally is his know]- edge necessary to the chemist pursuing his work on the development of durable water-resistant glues, on preservatives to prevent decay, and on prevention of decay in pulpwood and wood pulp. The knowl- edge of the dendrologist is necessary to all in order that the identity of the species under study may be determined with certainty and in order that peculiarities of their structural anatomy may not be over- looked. An organization of such men provided with proper equipment, materials and facilities for work cannot, in the long run, fail to secure results of value. It is such an organization that we have attempted to develop here. I shall make no attempt, at this time, to describe it A DeEcENNIAL ReEcorpD 115 in further detail. You will, this afternoon, get a first hand compre- hensive idea of its present scope. Suffice it to say that prior to 1917 it composed a personnel of approximately 80, expanding during the next 18 months to 500 and at present including slightly less than half that number. ‘The aggregate expenditures over the entire ten-year period are in the neighborhood of two million dollars-—a yearly average of about $200,000. This is but an insignificant sum when the breadth of the field and magnitude of the problems are considered. 'The re- sults of much of the work cannot, of course, be quoted in dollars and cents. Certain other results, however, enable the use of such a yard measure, and a few of them will, I am sure, serve to convince vou that organized industrial research is a paying proposition. For example: ‘The building and construction trade uses annu- ally approximately five and one-half billion feet for structural pur- poses where strength is important. This material is worth roughly $200,000,000. Investigations at the Forest Products Laboratory on the mechanical properties of American woods have given knowledge permitting a twenty per cent increase in allowable working stresses inmany structural timbers. If the results are actually applied to only ten per cent of such material, the annual saving will equal $4,000,000. The claims for loss and damage to commodities in shipment actu- ally paid by the railroads amount to $100,000,000 annually. Proper nailing, developed and recommended by the Forest Products Labora- tory, and adopted by the National Association of Box Manufactur- ers, and through them by many companies and shippers, if conserva- tively estimated to save but one per cent of this loss, means a total saving of $1,000,000 a vear. Work on water-resistant glues and plywood for airplanes carried on at the laboratory during the war emergency alone saved the War Department $6,000,000 in their procurement of such material during a twelve months period. Investigations carried on at the laboratory during the past year regarding the use of hull fiber and second cut cotton linters for pulp and paper have made available 200,000 tons for this purpose and have resulted in the establishment of large plants with potential production of 300 tons per day and an annual sales value of $15,000,000. 116 Tue Forest Propucts LABORATORY Improved methods of turpentining developed by the Forest Service resulted in increased yields and less injury to timber with net savings aggregating $4,000,000 per year. These few examples alone show combined annual increase in production and decrease in waste aggregating $30,000,000. They should serve to erystallize for vou the value and importance of indus- trial research. Results. of course, cannot be obtained over might. Patience is required and efforts are not always quickly crowned with success—but it cannot be doubted that over any reasonable period of years, economies resulting from organized research so greatly exceed the expense involved that there can be no question of its desirability. The lumber and wood-using industries represent some of the greatest and most important manufacturing and industrial develop- ments of the country.- Of the nation’s industries they rank second in invested capital, first in labor employed, and second in annual value of products. ‘The Forest Products Laboratory is the only institution of organized research engaged upon the problems of these industries, and those problems yet untouched and unexplored are many and of far reaching importance. What, for example, of the possibilities which may result from the development of permanently durable and waterproof glues or adhesives and their application to the use of material too small or of too poor a grade for other service—what of their application to forest economics through the increased value thus given to small second growth material? What of the sulphite-pulp liquor problem involving the possibility of utilizing the 55 per cent of the wood fed into the pulp digesters and now Jost in the waste sul- phite liquors? What of the problems of packing, boxing, and crating of various materials and commodities for shipment and transporta- tion when conservative estimates show a possible theoretical annual saving to the country of three hundred million dollars? What of the need for improvement and the method of treatment and handling of piling and dock timbers in water infested with marine borers which destroy the piling within 18 months after placement and cause an annual replacement aggregating millions of dollars in the various harbors of the nation? What of the waning supply of hardwoods and the need for authentic knowledge of the properties of South American and other foreign woods as compared to those of our own country for which they may ultimately be needed as substitutes? A DECENNIAL RECORD Bis Slight progress and success applied to only a small per cent of even the limited field above suggested, will result in annual savings greater than the total expenses for the entire Forest Products Lab- oratory for the past ten-year period. Such savings, of course, will not result only from research within the confines of the laboratory; but will necessitate the dissemination and application of these results in industrial service. Your help is particularly needed in this phase of the work. NEW BOXES FOR OLD—SOME WAR TIME BOX WORK OF THE LABORATORY Trench Mortar Shell Boxes 4.7 Inch Shell Boxes U. S. Army Rifles Box Browning Automatie Rifles Box A DrEcENNIAL REcoRD 119 INTRODUCTORY SPEECH Burr W. Jones, Toastmaster You had an opportunity today to witness an exhibition such as you would not find any other place on the face of the globe. It is true that several people have imitations of our laboratory. ‘They have one in Canada; they have one in Australia; Great Britain has started two or three in far off India and Africa; but none of them can offer such an exhibition or compare with such an exhibit as you have seen today. This was the original Forest Products Laboratory. For some time it was the only one. It had a very modest beginning—several gentlemen worked here in two or three rooms out in Wingra Park. ‘They corresponded with some others in other parts of the country. Some of the wise men in Washington—there are always a few wise men in Washington—be- came interested, and our Board of Regents, who were always pro- gressive, became interested; and it was finally arranged, as you heard today, that the Regents would erect a building and that the govern- ment at Washington would furnish the money to maintain it. So the work went on. We here in Madison did not hear very much about it until we got into the war, and then we began to hear a good deal. We used to hear that the government had recognized its child and appreciated the great service which the Forests Products Laboratory could render. They had a comparatively small number of men on the force, but dur- ing the war they had five or six hundred. Instead of one building which they had occupied they then occupied the most of nine or ten, and they were aiding the government in many ways. I suppose that the human mind can hardly conceive of the vast amount of shipping which it was necessary for our government to begin to send over the seas. I can best illustrate it perhaps by the incident of the boy who was told by his teacher to find out from his father what a million dollars meant. The boy went to his father and asked him. ‘The father was rather amused and interested at the pre- cocity of his boy and answered, not very prudently, “A million dol- 120 THe Forest Propucts LABORATORY lars! A million dollars is a hell of a lot.” The boy gave his teacher this valuable information in the language of his father, and the boy got a licking. Now this illustrates in a way, in somewhat emphatic language it describes, the vast amount of material which our government had to send across the seas. They came to this laboratory for advice. I sup- pose that those who originated the idea never dreamed that this insti- tution out here would be aiding our great government, in a war with the great nation of Germany, to send beyond the seas such articles as munitions, rifles, and all kinds of accessories of war. Yet, such was the fact. At this time we began to hear about the work of the lab- oratory. We began to hear, and have heard ever since, that while it has been in existence, hundreds of men have come here. Several hun- dred men from the great industries have come to take their short courses of instruction. Such companies in the United States as the General Electric, the Western Electric, and many others of the great corporations have sent their representatives here to learn something which would aid them in carrying on their practical work. The liberal representation of lumbermen, those interested in manufactures, here today illustrates their view of the importance of this work. I listened today to Dr. Birge and Governor Philipp, and I heard Mr. Winslow talk a little about the work which had been done here. I talked a little with him before, and I talked with Mr. Weiss. and it seems to me that they are the two most modest fellows I ever saw. Why, as Mr. Winslow made his speech today, telling in his modest, quiet way of the work of this institution, if he had been followed by one of those orators (properly coached, and told what ought to be said), one of the orators from the Chicago Convention—the Repub- lican Convention—or the San Francisco Democratie Convention, with his foghorn voice and his swinging arms, I don’t know what we might have done. We might have gathered in processions and wrapped the flag around Mr. Weiss, Mr. Winslow, Governor Philipp and Presi- dent Birge, but it has not been the method of the laboratory to indulge in that kind of publicity. Now we are going to hear from a gentleman presently who knows not only about the work of this institution, but about forestry in gen- eral. When I was a lad living on the old farm I mistrust that if any- one said to a group of farmers that it would be a good thing to send A DEcCENNIAL REcoRD 121 fellows to a college to learn about forestry he would have been ridi- culed. ‘They would all have felt that there was no need of sending a man to college to learn to split rails, or cut saw-logs; but we have one here tonight, a real forester, who has been in college, and the account that I may give of him sounds hike a fairy tale—reared in California, educated at the State University, then at Yale, he first took control of forest matters in the Appalachians, was then called back to the Sequoia forest, then to the great forests of Montana and Idaho, then to Washington, and like so many of our other patriotic college men, he was called to France. First he was called upon to aid in recruiting twenty thousand foresters. I imagine when Alexander, Caesar, and Bonaparte carried on their wars they did not recruit foresters, but this gentleman who is to talk tonight did. He went over to France, and there in the forests of France he ran sawmills and he ran the lumber- jacks, and helped win the war. He came back and is now connected with the government forestry service, the Chief of the Forest Service. I take great pleasure in introducing Colonel Greeley. NOTABLE DECENNIAL FIGURES DIRECTOR C. P. WINSLOW, FORESTER W. B. GREELEY, FORMER DIRECTOR H. F. WEISS a A DeEcCENNIAL RECORD 123 i FORESTS AND NATIONAL PROSPERITY William B. Greeley, Forester, U. S. Forest Service This morning when I entered the hotel and approached the gen- tleman in charge of the check rooms he pointed to a group of gentlemen in the lobby wearing this little white ribbon and said, “Be this the undertakers’ convention?” I said, “No, sir, this is a convention of woodusers.” ‘Then, “Well, them undertakers use lots of wood.” So I think Mr. Winslow should have capped the climax by referring to the wooden coffin in which most of us hope to repose our weary bones after the game has been played to the last goal. Someone has suggested to me that I am supposed to make a key- note speech tonight. I know that keynote speeches are popular pastime this summer, but I want to assure you that I have no keynote ambitions. In fact, judging from the experience that I have just come from—lI think the very last speech I made prior to this—I come to you in a very humble frame of mind. I was talking to a group ot ranchers, road builders, ete., out on one of our Colorado forests. We were talking about timber, the resources of that region, and I got up before them with a good deal of enthusiasm and talked about what the Forest Service was going to do, what we were going to do with our timber, with our water power, our grazing lands, etc., and really, I suppose gave the impression that I possibly was the sole owner and dictator of this vast public domain. Well, after the ceremonies were over one of the old-timers, a man who had grown up in that country since early boyhood, in the audience approached me. The “my” and “our” in my speech had not set just right on the old man’s system. ieffe said, “Young fellow, your talk sounded to me a little bit like the time when the devil took our Lord and Master up on high mountain and showed him all the domains of the world and said that all of those should be his if he would only do what Mr. Devil said, and the durned old coot did not own a single acre of it.” There is no occasion for keynote speeches. The things that have brought us together are the simple fundamental things and the sort of 124 THe Forrest Propucts LARORATORY things that we should approach in the light of sober, every-day, well- known truth. These are days when the whole world is being reconstructed. The stage is set for a new era in international relations and industrial com- petition. The times make it worth while to consider some of the things which in the new rivalry of world progress will make nations strong. We hear much about the oil fields of the world and how the industrial control of the harrassed old planet will lie with the people who control the bulk of its crude oil. Yet, oil is but an example of the many raw materials which modern civilization demands. And while keeping a watchful eye upon new and undeveloped sources of raw material, surely we must not overlook the resources which nature has put in our own hands. Many of us who served in France were able to see at first hand the conditions of life and industry in a country where population has crowded close upon natural resources, where for the masses living has become close and hard, and, even to maintain standards of comfort far below what the average American demands, a degree of thrift and fru- gality beyond our comprehension must be constantly employed. In France wood is a commodity of a totally different character from what it has been in the United States. Even with the care and intelligence applied unremittingly to French forests, lumber is priced as an im- ported luxury. No one can become familiar with that country without appreciating how this fact handicaps the comfort of living and the industrial opportunities of the French nation. The gleaning of the forests for little fagots, the very scaffolds used in city building, which are made out of small poles carefully lashed together and used over and over again, tell the story. With all their beauty and picturesque- ness, the rural districts of France often leave an impression of decad- ence. A new structure of any kind is a rare sight and moss-covered stone buildings of the time of Jeanne d’Arc must serve the French farmer of today. Only a people great in industry and foresight could, under such limitations, have built up within an area less than that of our single largest state, the great industrial nation that France is today. The lesson which such things bring home is, in a broad way, the same fundamental truth which underlies many economic problems of A DEcCENNIAL RECORD 125 oe the present time—not alone those of America, but of the whole world as it strives to get back to normal industry. It is an old and simple axiom: Aside from the will to work which is the foremost quality of any strong nation, its economic and social progress depends in the long run upon the foresight and efficiency with which its natural resources are used. This is simply an attempt to restate, crudely and partially, the conception of national conservation which was embodied in our public thought and policies by President Roosevelt fifteen years ago. It is the viewpoint of the public welware in the long run which two great leaders, President Roosevelt and Gifford Pinchot, brought to bear upon our forest resources, our national water powers, and our national deposits of coal and oil. The Forest Products Laboratory at Madi- son, which now completes its first decade, stands as a visible and prac- tical expression of the thought of these leaders in the field of forest conservation. ‘To make the most of our forest resources Mr. Pinchot and his associates foresaw that knowledge of the use of wood must progress hand in hand with the national movement to assure a sufficient supply of this essential raw material. Fach had an integral part in forest conservation. It was not enough to create National Forests in which the Federal Government might embark in the business of timber production and to assist the private owner in keeping his woodlands productive. It was equally necessary to build up a practical science of wood use,—to determine how to get the right stick into the right place where its:strength or durability would count for the most; how to make one railroad tie do the work of two or three, by prolong- ing its life and service; how to utilize the enormous quantities of waste material in our forests and sawmills; how to reduce manufacturing losses and better the methods of employing wood in the infinite number of American industries which require it, from the paper mill to the automobile factory; and what fresh supplies of wood could be found for this or that industry as old sources of raw material were exhausted. The Forest Products Laboratory was built by men who saw that to answer these questions and others like them was as necessary as to stop forest fires; that the wood technician in the factory must supple- ment the woodsman in the forest. And they not only built the Lab- oratory as an efficient unit of itself; they built it into and made it part of one of the most virile and far-sighted movements toward using nat- 126 Tue Forest Propucts LABORATORY ural resources for national efficiency in the long run that the world has ever witnessed. Much in the way of practical forest conservation has been accom- plished by this vigorous and growing movement. One hundred and fifty-five million acres of National Forests have been established and partially developed for the maximum public service in producing tim- ber and forage and protecting water sources. Some thirty of the states have enlisted in the suppression of forest fires, and in spreading the gospel of wise use of timber-growing land. Much has been done in our industries to prolong the life of wood and utilize materials pre- viously wasted. And yet we must recognize today that forestry is still just what President Roosevelt called it fifteen years ago—one of the most important internal problems of the United States. The after- math of the war has indeed brought home its magnitude and its seri- ousness much more sharply than any previous event in the history of this country. Consider for 2 moment our situation today as a people of wood users. The United States at this moment is short at least one million homes. In comparison with the need, new dwellings are being con- structed at a snail’s pace because of the high cost of lumber, other building materials, and of labor. From the shortage of homes arise exorbitant rents, crowded living conditions, and lowered standards of comfort and family life. The average farm in the United States needs about two thousand board feet of lumber every’year for new buildings and improvements. Because the average farmer can not obtain lum- ber at prices within his reach, farm development is handicapped and the efficiency of agriculture suffers. This is a factor of no slight im- portance in our vital problem of food supply and living costs. We need six and one-quarter million cords of wood a year to make our newspapers, magazines, books, pasteboard boxes, and other prod- ucts manufactured from wood pulp. We are meeting this need at present only by importing a third of our paper or paper-making mate- rials from Canada. We require from one hundred to one hundred twenty-five million railroad ties each year to keep up and extend our railroad lines, aside from enormous quantities of timber used in other forms for railroad construction and the building of cars. We have to have at least six billion feet of timber yearly for boxes, crates, and bar- rels, a requirement which is steadily increasing. In several highly de- A DEcCENNIAL REcoRD 7 veloped agricultural regions an assured supply of containers for shipping farm products to market has become a serious problem in itself. A group of our important manufacturers, the makers of wood veneers, handles, vehicles, furniture, and agricultural implements con- sume one and one-half billion feet of timber yearly. It is upon this group, perhaps, that the growing shortage of timber falls most heavily, since they require largely high grade hardwoods and other timber which the virgin forests of the United States furnished so lavishly, but which it is now becoming more and more difficult to find in suffi- cient quantities. All told, we demand of our forests about fifty-six billion feet of timber yearly, aside from well over one hundred million cords of small material for fuel and various chemical products. There is nothing comparable to this enormous use of wood in the history of the world. We are preeminently a wood-using nation. It is wood that has devel- oped our farm lands, that has largely built and equipped our railroads, and that supports many of our most valuable and distinctive manufac- turing industries. We use from two to four times as much wood—for every member of our population—as the most highly developed coun- tries of Europe. The abundance and general distribution of our native forests have had a tremendous part in the domestic and industrial de- velopment of the United States and in its commercial supremacy. We ean not face the future without a sober and intelligent consideration of that fact. Even with the large substitutions of other materials for lumber, the United States with its growing population can not greatly reduce its present total use of wood without serious injury to its home build- ing, its agriculture and its manufactures. And we must find out how to supply our own needs largely from our own resources, for it is doubt- ful if lumber imports can be greatly increased within reasonable prices. So much do we ask of our forests. How far can our forests fill this order? The original forests of the United States are supposed to have covered eight hundred twenty-two million acres. Over two-thirds of this area has been culled, cut-over, or burnt. There are left today about four hundred sixty-three million acres of forest and cut-over land of all sorts, which contains about two thousand two hundred and 128 THe Forest Propucts LABORATORY fourteen billion feet of timber of merchantable sizes. ‘Three-fifths of the timber originally in the United States is gone. All told we are taking about four times the amount of wood out of our forests every year which we are growing in them. We are cut- ting more of every class of timber than we are growing. We are even using up the trees too small for the sawmill, but upon which our future lumber supply depends, three and one-half times as fast as they aré being produced. Of still greater significance is the fact that the timber left is not in the right place. ‘The crux of timber depletion is the exhaustion, or partial exhaustion, of the forests most available to the great bulk of our population, agriculture, and manufactures. One timber region after another in the eastern states has been cut out. Less than five per cent of the virgin forests of New England and about twelve per cent of her original stand of timber are left. New York, the leading state in lumber production in 1850, now manufactures only thirty board feet per capita yearly, or not more than a tenth of the require- ments of her own population and industries. Pennsylvania was the leading lumber manufacturing state in 1860. She now cuts less than the amount consumed in the Pittsburg district alone. The original pine forests of the Lake States, estimated at 350 billion feet, are now reduced to less than eight billion. In 1892 the sawmills in the region bordering the Great Lakes cut nine billion board feet of lumber and largely supplied the softwood markets of the Prai- rie and Central States and eastward to New England. ‘Today their yearly cut is a single billion. These four densely populated regions, stretching from the Atlantic to the Prairies, which formerly were lum- ber exporters and still contain enormous areas of forest land, are now partly or largely dependent upon timber grown and manufactured elsewhere and are becoming increasingly dependent upon timber which must be shipped the width of the continent. The bulk of the building and structural timbers used in the east- ern and central states during the last twenty years was grown in the pine forests of the south. But the cut of southern pine is now falling off and within another decade promises to exceed by little, if at all, the requirements of the southern states themselves. The shifting of the hardwood industries has followed much the same course. The princi- pal reserve of hardwoods is in the Southern Mississippi Valley and A DECENNIAL REcoRD 129 Eel even here it is doubtful if the cut of hardwood lumber can be materially increased for any great length of time. ‘The scarcity of high grade oak, poplar, ash, hickory, walnut, and other standard hardwoods is now confronting many industries with a difficult situation. One-half of the timber remaining in the Continental United States is in three states bordering the Pacific ocean. Sixty-one per cent of it hes west of the Great Plains. Since 1894 western timber has been filling gaps in the eastern and middle western markets. Within the past year it has assumed a dominating place in the principal mark- ets of the Lake States and has largely replaced southern pine at many consuming points in the Central States. It is estimated that within the next decade the shortage of nearer timber will compel the Eastern and Central States to increase their annual consumption of western timber by eleven and one-half billion board feet. The true index of timber depletion is not in the quantity that is left but its availability. 'This is shown partly in the cost of trans- porting the average thousand feet of lumber from the sawmill to the user. Prior to 1850 when the great bulk of our lumber was manufac- tured near the points of use, the transportation cost averaged less than $3.00 per thousand board feet. ‘Today it is probably $10.00. In another decade, at the freight rates now prevailing, it will reach $15.00 per thousand feet. But aside from rising freight costs, the exhaustion of nearby supplies of timber imposes upon the consumer all the disad- vantages of being dependent upon distant and restricted manufactur- ing regions. These include congestion of transportation, the effects of labor shortages and bad weather in limited regions, and a narrowed field of competition. Not only is the quantity of timber left in the United States being used up much more rapidly than wood is being grown; the availability of the remaining timber to the average consumer is steadily decreasing. ‘The situation which confronts us now will be different only in degree if we allow the western forests also to be exhausted and are compelled to import most of our lumber from Siberia or South America. Doubtless the extreme conditions of the present lumber markets will be relieved in no great length of time and more moderate prices will prevail. The outstanding fact remains, however, that lumber price levels higher than those existing before the war must be expected be- cause of the depletion, or approaching depletion, of our forest regions 130 Tue Forest Propucts LABORATORY east of the Great Plains. We are fast losing the great leveler of lum- ber prices, the competition between different forest regions available to a common market. The scarcity of forest products of high quality, cut from old growth timber, will not be readily or quickly overcome. Meantime forest depletion is going steadily on, unchecked. It must lead inevitably to rising price levels under normal conditions. It will contribute to sudden and excessive increases in lumber prices in any future transportation, labor, or other crisis. The real cause of our timber depletion is idle forest land. Short- ages of wood have not resulted primarily from the use of our forests, but from their devastation. The kernel of the problem lies in the enor- mous areas of forest land which are not producing the timber crops that they should. There are 326 million acres of cut-over timber lands bearing no saw timber in the United States. Their condition ranges from complete devastation through various stages of partial restock- ing or restocking with trees of inferior quality, to relatively limited areas which are producing timber at or near their full capacity. On eighty-one million acres there is practically no forest growth. ‘This is the result of forest fires and of methods of cutting which destroy or prevent new timber growth. ‘There were twenty-seven thousand re- corded forest fires in 1919, burning a total of eight and one-fourth million acres. During the preceding year, twenty-five thousand fires burned over ten and one-half million acres of forest land. An addi- tional large acreage was burned each year, of which no record could be obtained. The area of idle or largely idle land is being increased by from three to four million acres annually as the cutting and burning of for- ests continue. The enormous area of forest land in the United States not required for any other economic use, estimated at four hundred sixty-three million acres, would provide an ample supply of wood if it were kept productive. Depletion has resulted, not from using our timber resources, but from failure to use our timber-growing land. It is unthinkable that the United States should be compelled to steadily contract its use of timber—down to the level of civilized exist- ence as in other countries of western Europe. We are not an old world nation. We still have millons of acres of raw agricultural land to be developed. We still have millions of homes to be built and thou- sands of miles of T-rails to be laid. We are at the threshold of the A DECENNIAL REcorRD 131 greatest opportunity to expand our world trade in manufactures which we have ever had. It is unthinkable, I say, that, in the face of these vast requirements and opportunities, the people of the United States should be content to watch one of their essential and readily renewable raw materials become steadily scarcer and less available; that they should accept famine prices on timber as a normal condition, with en- forced contractions in its use, embargoes, and governmental restric- tions. And such a course is as unnecessary as it would be disastrous. We have an ample area of forest-growing land, over and above any probable demands for farm crops, most of it indeed unfit for culti- vation—an area ample to meet all of our timber requirements if its timber-growing capacity is but put to use. From every hand, during the last few months, we have been told to increase production as the cure of our economic ills. I submit that increased production from land is as necessary as increased production by human labor. The idleness of millions of acres of forest-growing land may be even more disastrous in its ultimate effects than the idleness of hundreds of thou- sands of skilled mechanics. And we have in America today an area of idle forest land equal to the combined forest of Continental Kurope aside from Russia. The answer to the forestry problem of the United States is not to use less wood but to grow more—to put our idle acres of burned and logged-off timber land at work growing trees. This is not inherently a difficult thing to accomplish. It is not the Utopian dream of a tech- nical enthusiast. Three-fourth of it lies in preventing forest fires. But it does require an aggressive national policy of reforestation. It requires concerted action by the national and state governments to do the things which must be done by public agencies. It requires the active participation of the private forest owner. It requires a clear definition of public and private responsibilities as to timber-growing land, with an equitable showing of the cost. There is no phase of our whole problem of an assured and perpetual supply of timber that can- not be met by simple and obvious measures once the constructive effort and capacity for organized cooperation of the American people are put behind them. It is no exaggeration to say that abundant and well distributed forests have been a vital factor in the prosperity of the United States. It rests with us to say whether they will continue to be, or whether we 132 THe Forest Propucts LABORATORY must readjust our internal and industrial development within the next half century to a basis where wood is an imported luxury. ‘The last two years have shown all too clearly what that actually means. We can no more continue to draw indefinitely upon the timber stored up by nature than we can draw upon the natural fertility of our farm lands without maintaining and restoring it. et us safeguard the sources of our national wealth and show that we have the thrift and constructive ability to use them with intelligence and foresight. Remarks of Mr. Jones Following Colonel Greeley’s Talk When I was a student in our university—you can tell from my looks how long ago—there were four classes of men who were properly supposed to come to college or university: the prospective lawyer, the doctor, the preachers, and the teacher. If one had announced that he intended coming to our university to become a forester he would have been thought a freak. We had one engineer, I remember, a long lank fellow. We sympathized with him. We thought he was going to be so lonesome in the world. We little realized that before the present time, thousands of engineers would have left our university and engi- neering would be among the greatest of the industries in America. Sometimes it is difficult to tell what profession one should join. I heard of one good father and mother, with their only son John, who were asked what they were going to do with him. The father said he had talked of this a great deal with the mother and they concluded that John must be a lawyer or a doctor, and on thinking it all over they had concluded that they would rather take him law than his medicine, and he was going to be a lawyer. We have here tonight one of that class belonging to the teaching class, one who elected to become a professor. We who live in Madison knew him very well. We knew his father and mother and his grand- father and grandmother and everyone before him. I knew him par- ticularly well because I was his nearest neighbor. I watched his antics and his pranks as a boy, and they were just as harmless as the pranks and antics of other boys. I supposed that in a little while he would grow up and marry and settle down and become a hardware merchant or a lumber merchant following the ways of his ancestors. By-and-by A DeECENNIAL RECORD 133 we heard that he was a shark in mathematics, and we began to hear that he was a shark in physics. We did not know any more about physics than we did about Hebrew, but we were glad to have a shark among us. After a while we were glad that he became a professor in our university, and we were prouder still, though somewhat sad, when he was called to Yale. ‘Then after he left us we began to hear that he was one of the greatest physicists in America. We were glad to hear also afterwhile that he had concluded to come back to his old university, his old city, and his old fishing grounds. Then the war came on, and we began to hear that our friend was experimenting out on Lake Mendota to further the demands of our country for means to check the advance of the Kaiser and Hinden- burg and their submarines in their attempts to sink the navies of the Alles. We thought it was a pretty big job he was undertaking, and a rather small field for his operations, but we had faith in him, and presently we heard of his experiments along the Atlantic Coast; and then we heard that he had actually invented a device that would detect the coming of the submarines. ‘Then we heard that he had been called cver to England to consult with the scientists and the naval experts of the Allies—and finally he came back. He is here tonight. He has been called upon to step into the breach to take the place of a celebrated engineer who had intended to come. I have the pleasure of introducing Professor Max Mason who will speak to you. iti mapa Sec BENDING OF HEAVY WHEEL RIMS A DEcCENNIAL REcoRD 135 THE SUBMARINE DETECTOR Professor Max Mason, University of Wisconsin Ladies and Gentlemen: Our experience in the attempt to develop some ways which would aid in combating the German submarine warfare began shortly after our entrance into the war with a meeting called by the National Re- search Council in Washington. Physicists from America were sum- moned to hear a discussion of the ways and means of meeting the sub- marine combat by the British and French naval and scientific men who were sent to America for the purpose of giving American research a running start: and in the course of two or three days we were told of the naval methods of combating the submarines and of the scientific research which had already been started and which had resulted in the perfection and installation of some detective devices. We were shocked at that time to realize that the enormous loss through the sinking of ships—that was in the early days of 1918—were being accomplished by a marvelously small number of submarines. From the experience of the British and French navies combined it was estimated that only 12 or 14 submarines were on duty at one time, and we left that conference with the thought that if 12 or 14 can do this damage, and if submarines can be constructed rapidly and manned rapidly, what an enormous amount of waste would result in the near future. At that time there was no adequate defense against submarines. The British naval officers summed it up in this way: “T have not much to tell you of our submarine work. It consists of the following action. We get a wireless message that a ship has been torpedoed and we send out a boat to pick up the survivors.” About that time the navy’s use of depth charges and the institution of the convoy system effectively changed things so that the situation cleared up greatly. In the early days a destroyer would take one or two depth charges and some cans of TNT, 300 pounds each, and if they were dead certain they were near the submarine they would drop a can of TNT thinking they had probably destroyed it. In later days destroyers went 136 THe Forest Propucts LABORATORY out with their ship decks loaded with depth charges up to 100 in num- ber and toured over the sea, dropping in a definitely ordered spiral as many as 60 depth charges in 10 seconds of one another; and, of course, if they did not destroy the submarine they shook up the personnel so enormously that it became very unpleasant in the submarine. The great problem was to find where it was, and that was the problem which the National Research Council wished to solve. What detective device could be used to determine the position of the subma- rine when completely submerged? I will not and can not give you in a short time the number of devices which were attempted to detect submarines. Probably if you took a large text book on physics and read every chapter you would not find any physical phenomenon which was not attempted, which was not utilized in some way, to attempt to detect submarines by virtue of that phenomenon—light, sound, heat, electricity, magnetism, everything—but the thing that seemed most promising was sound, for a machine can not move without making a considerable noise. Unfortunately a submarine does not make much noise. ‘The efforts we made in Wisconsin towards detecting subma- rines were based upon the method of determining their position by the sound they make. ‘That is not an easy problem. The submarine makes a noise like that of a humming bird in a boiler factory, the factory corresponding to the ship and the humming bird to the submarine to be detected. You can imagine what it would be if you were clattering down a cobblestone street with a threshing machine and an electric automobile was somewhere distant and you were trying to determine just where the automobile was at every instant. You could not do it. The plan which occurred to me in relation to the detecting device was to work with sound in some such manner as we are familiar with in light. You cannot see a star in the daytime but if you sufficiently sereen off the disturbing light from the skies and utilize a deep well or a telescope you can see it in the daytime. If you can get some method of intensifying sound from one direction only and shutting it off from all other directions you might be able to detect a fair portion of one sound by thus eliminating the others, and the instruments we developed were based on that theory. We started working here with the generous and cordial support of the University of Wisconsin re- gents. We soon moved to New London, and there under the naval A DECENNIAL RECORD 137 auspices continued throughout the war. >a ¢ d ic ae et oats — =, > onl — fi rathe) AST = jd a oe wae * Siiten ee * : - x P ; : ; : fy s,, end Ja Ny ate how Po ‘ ‘ £2 d Vere at | Wis ,, FA et fod - bi = a _¥ er = = s — _ {axe ‘ LP f ' zy ¢ oo f ' se u a a4 r hs 7 hi i 2 mp! f ‘ ry , a Aj # ? _ Pe ahi ri } fia } vaat 4 ‘ ry if 7; oP * ott gt i gh ; fies P : Leaeaa i al : i Fae 1 Tomei Pi y nd | i ae if . . oi i ov ' beet Eat pant | Ae My RW ME i 9 | fk | } He eer i te Pehl i ae Realy} a a ar Drees Ae 1 : an ey H d ‘ # ih, wh) ee ‘ he a“. ah fee ea pit t Pari ry i ed ERIC ae i- om wpe ohc+inieietag ae 7 _ re A) id 2 i. se 5! = a ; een a a yey ae ae oe a 2. as 9 t REGISTRATION LIST Forest Products Laboratory Decennial Celebration, Madison, Wisconsin, July 22 and 23, 1920 Ackerman, E. D., Waterproof Adhesives Co., Milwaukee, Wis. Adams, F.. R., Pacific Lumber Co., Chicago, Ill. Alexander, John E., Nekoosa~Edwards Paper Co., Port Edwards, Wis. Alexander, John K., Mrs., Port Edwards, Wis. Alexander, L. M., Pres., Nekoosa~Edwards Paper Co., Port Kd- wards, Wis. Alexander, L. M., Mrs., Port Edwards, Wis. Altman, N. A., J. W. Butler Paper Co., Chicago, III. Anderson, W. R., Publisher, “Packages”, Milwaukee, Wis. Angier, F’. J., Baltimore & Ohio R. R., Baltimore, Md. Babbitt, W. C., Gen. Sece’y., Natl. Assn. of Wood Turners, South Bend, Ind. Baker, John S., Baker Mfg. Co., Evansville, Wis. Baker, Wm. B., Secy., Nat] Assn. Chair Mfgrs., Chicago, III. Barr, H. G., J. I. Case Co., Racine, Wis. Barth, Kurt, Barrett Co., Chicago, Il. Bartle, F. C., Mrs., Madison, Wis. Bartle, Gladys, Madison, Wis. Bartle, Vernetta, Madison, Wis. Bauer, Carl, Doesch & Bauer Co., Chicago, Ill. Belknap, G. F., Aeroshade Co., Waukesha, Wis. Birge, E. A., Pres., University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis. Bitting, A. W., Dr., Glass Containers Assn., Chicago, III. Blackburn, Robert, Wilbur Lumber Co., Milwaukee, Wis. Blanco, J. P., San Juan, Porto Rico. Boehme, E. E., International Creosoting Co., Galveston, Tex. Boettcher, Albert E., Milwaukee Chair Co., Milwaukee, Wis. 180 THe Forest Propucts LABoratory Bolz, H. C., Bolz Cooperage Corp., St. Louis, Mo. Bolz, P. T., Pres., Bolz Cooperage Corp., St. Louis, Mo. Brandenburg, O. D., Pres., Democrat Printing Co.; Mng. Editor, Madison Democrat, Madison, Wis. Brantingham, C. S., Kmerson—Brantingham Co., Rockford, IIL. Brantingham, C. S., Mrs., Rockford, Il. Bray, Chas. P., Baggage Mfg. Assn., Conway Bldg., Chicago, III. Bremer, G. B., J. J. Fitzpatrick Lumber Co., Madison, Wis. Brown, H. H., Pejepscott Paper Co., Brunswick, Maine. Bryant, R. C., Yale University, New Haven, Conn. Buckstaff, R. N., Buckstaff Co., Oshkosh, Wis. Buehler, Walter, Barrett Co., New York, N. Y. Burgess, C. F., Pres., C. F. Burgess Laboratory, Madison, Wis. Burgess, Mrs. C. F., Madison, Wis. Gard, J. B., Central Creosoting Co., Chicago, Ill. Caswell, A. B., Pfister & Vogel Leather Co., Milwaukee, Wis. Chapman, Arnold, International Alcohol Corp., New York, N. Y. Cheyney, E. G., University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minn. (Chief, Division of Forestry). Clark, Allen W., American Car & Foundry Co., Jeffersonville, Ind. Clark, Mrs. Allen W., Jeffersonville, Ind. Clark, W. A., Chief Engr., Duluth & Superior R. R., Duluth, Minn. Clausen, F. H., Van Brunt Mfg. Co., Horicon, Wis. Compton, Wilson, Sec.-_Mgr., National Lumber Mfgrs. Assn., Chi- cago, Il. Cone, A. B., “Lumber World Review”, Chicago, Il. Conrad, Elizabeth, Madison, Wis. Conzet, G. M., Fire Inspector, State of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minn. Cooper, R. E., Spanish River Pulp & Paper Co., Soo, Ontario. Cornell, Herbert W., Milwaukee, Wis. Corry, W. J., Foster Creek Lumber & Mfg. Co., Madison, Wis. Cox, W. T., State Forester, St. Paul, Minn. Coye, C. W., Industrial Specialist, Grand Rapids, Mich. Crawford, Carl G., American Creosoting Co., Louisville, Ky. Curtis, C. E., Wisconsin Cabinet & Panel Co., New London, Wis. Cushman, R. E., Northwestern Timber Co., Mendota, Ill. A DECENNIAL RECORD 181 Dahl, R. D., Shevlin, Carpenter & Clarke, Minneapolis, Minn. Dana, S. T., U. S. Forest Service, Washington, D. C. Davies, Luther, Oshkosh, Wis. (Icumberman). Defebaugh, Carl W., “American Lumberman”, Chicago, Ill. Demartini, F’., Sec., Baggage Mfgr. Assn., Conway Bldg., Chicago, ri: Dudley, J. E., Madison, Wis. Dudley, J. E., Mrs., Madison, Wis. Dumond, Louis A., Chicago Assn. of Commerce, Chicago, I. Dunlap, Frederick, University of Missouri, Columbia, Mo. Esau, Ralph, Barrett Co., Chicago, Ll. Everest, D. C., Secy. and Gen. Mgr., Marathon Paper Co., Wausau, Wis. Fitzpatrick, J. J., J. J. Fitzpatrick Lumber Co., Madison, Wis. Foley, John, Pennsylvania R. R. Co., Philadelphia, Pa. Frantz, S. G., Crossett Lumber Co., Crossett, Ark. Fredrickson, E. A., Virginia & Rainy Lake Co., Minneapolis, Minn. Fredrickson, S. D., A. D. & J. V. Fredrickson Lumber Co., Madison, Wis. Frick, O. H., Milwaukee, Wis. Fuller, L. E., Editor, “The Lumber & Veneer Consumers’, Chicago, ny. Furlong, Edward, “Packages”, Milwaukee, Wis. Gilchrist, W. A., National Lumber Mfgrs. Assn., Chicago, Il. Goodman, R. B., R. B. Goodman Lbr. Co., Marinette, Wis. Goslines, C. E., D. L. & W. Railroad, Paterson, N. J. Grady, W. H., American Creosoting Co., Louisville, Ky. Graves, L. W., J. P. Devine Co., Buffalo, N. Y. Greeley, W. B., Forester, U. S. Forest Service, Washington, D. C. Green, George R., Pennsylvania State College of Forestry, State Col- lege, Pa. Greider, C. E., B. F. Sturtevant Co., Chicago, III. Greider, C K., Mrs., Chicago, Ill. Grow, J. H., Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co., Milwaukee, Wis. 182 THe Forrest Propuctrs LABorRATORY Gullickson, O., Pres., Chicago Furniture Assn.; also Churchill Cabi- net Co., Chicago, I]. Gullickson, S., Churchill Cabinet Co., Chicago, Il. Hamilton, C. L., Weyerhauser Forest Products Co., St. Paul, Minn. Hanson, Adolph, J. I. Case Co., Racine, Wis. Harder, Geo. N., Rib Lake Lumber Co., Rib Lake, Wis. Harrington, C. L., Wisconsin Conservation Comm., Madison, Wis. Hemingway, E. E., Wisconsin Timber & Land Co., Mattoon, Wis. Hendricks, Mr., Madison, Wis. Henning, S. B., Anderson-Tully Co., Memphis, Tenn. Henry, A. T., Morgan Co., Oshkosh, Wis. Henry, G. E., Editor, “Barrel & Box’, Chicago, Il. Hickey, E. H., Sec.-Treas., “Packages”, Milwaukee, Wis. Hirt, J. F., Vice-Pres., Management Service Co., Chicago, III. Hogue, C. J., West Coast Lumbermans’ Assn., New York City. Holbrook, L. W., Asst. Treas., Shevlin Co., Minneapolis, Minn. Holderness, Robert M., Bain Wagon Co., Kenosha, Wis. Honnell, F. H., Wilson & Co., Chicago, III. Horn, S. F., Editor, “Southern Lumberman’’, Nashville, Tenn. Hosford, Roger S., American Tel. & Tel. Co., New York, N. Y. Hosmer, Ralph S., Dept. of Forestry, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, N. Y. How, H. W.., J. P. Devine Co., Buffalo, N. Y. Howard, H. C., National Assn. of Box Mfegrs., Chicago, Il. Howe, H. E., National Research Council, Washington, D. C. Howson, E. T., “Railway Maintenance Engineer”, Chicago, Ill. Hoyt, H. B., Supt., Timber Preserving Plant, B. R. & P. Railroad, Bradford, Pa. Hubbard, C. W., Pres., Northwestern Timber Co., Mendota, Il. Hurd, N. L., Mid-West Box Co., Chicago, Il. Imrie; J. H., Cutler Desk Co;, Buttalo, N: Y- Imrie, J. E., Mrs., Buffalo, N. Y. Jackson, Carl D., Railroad Commission, Madison, Wis. Johnson, B. A., Editor, “Lumber World Review”, Chicago, III. Jones, B. W., Lawyer, Madison, Wis. Jones, Mrs. B. W., Madison, Wis. A DECENNIAL RECORD 183 Jones, G. W., Appleton, Wis. Jones, J. K., Southern Pine Assn., New Orleans, La. Jones, IT’. K., Athletic Director, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis. Joyce, A. R., Joyce—Watkins Co., Chicago, Il. Judd, Roy, Oxford, Wis. Karges, EK. F., Karges Furniture Co., Evansville, Ind. Kew; J. R., Treatmg Inspector, A. i. & S. F. R. R., Chicago, Ul. Keith, L. P., National Lbr. Mfgrs. Assn., Chicago, III. Kelly, T. E., Madison, Wis. Keyser, Henry, Western Grip & Trunk Co., Milwaukee, Wis. Kimberly, H. H., Morgan Co., Oshkosh, Wis. Kittridge, J. Jr., Forest Service, Washington, D. C. Knowlton, H. A., Reed College, Portland, Ore. Kraber, G. L., Turbine Air Tool Co., Cleveland, Ohio. Krafft, V. W., Sec., Associated Cooperage Industries of America, St. Louis, Mo. Krenz, M. B., Mrs., Chicago, Ill. Lamb, Geo. N., American Walnut Mfgrs. Assn., Chicago, III. Landstrom, O. E., Rockford Veneer & Panel Co., Rockford, II. Leicester, W. F'., Casein Glue Manufacturing Co., Chicago, II. Lemke, O. C., Underwood Veneer Co., Wausau, Wis. Leopold, Fredrick, Leopold Desk Co., Burlington, Iowa. Lester, S. A., Doyon & Rayne Lumber Co., Madison, Wis. Long, H. A., Automotive Wood Wheel Mfegrs. Assn., Chicago, Ill. Lovejoy, P. S., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich. Lunenschloss, L. L., Foster Creek Lbr. & Mfg. Co., Madison, Wis. MacLean, M. M., Chief Chemist, Dodge Mfg. Co., Mishawaka, Wis. Mallen, H., H. Z. Mallen Co., Chicago, Il. Mandenberg, E. C., Barrett Co., Chicago, Il. Marschall, A. J., Marschall Dairy Laboratory, Madison, Wis. Martin, Gus, Doesch & Bauer Co., Chicago, Tl. Mason, Max, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis. Mason, Mrs. Max, Madison, Wis. Maurer, EK. R., University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis. Mauthe, Wm., Casket Mfg. Assn. of the U. S., Fond du Lac, Wis. 184 — THe Forest Propuctrs LABoratory Maxwell, Hu, “American Lumberman’”, Chicago, III. McCaffrey, M. E., University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis. McCullough, E. W., Chamber of Commerce of the U. S. A., Wash- mgton, D. C. McKeever, Francis H., 4-Ones Wirebound Box Mfgrs. Assn., Chi- cago, Ill. McLarsen, A., Alfred Decker & Cohn, Chicago, Ill. McLoughlin, J. M., Gen. Mgr., Wisconsin Cabinet & Panel Co., New London, Wis. MeNair, C. J., Jr., Northwest Paper Co., Cloquet, Minn. Mead, Geo. W., Pres., Consolidated Water Power & Paper Co., Grand Rapids, Wis. Meeker, EK. W., Editor, “Hardwood Record”, Chicago, Il. Meeker, E. W., Mrs., Chicago, III. Merritt, L. G., Merritt Engineering & Sales Co., Lockport, N. Y. Merritt, 1.'G., Mrs., lhockport, N.Y. Miller, R. B., State Forester, Urbana, Ill. Moak, E. R., Managing Editor, Wisconsin State Journal, Madison, Wis. | Moon, Franklin, Syracuse University, Syracuse, N. Y. Moroney, Robert E., Dallas, Texas. Morris, Fred H., Union Cedar Co., Toledo, Ohio. Morris, Leslie, Chicago Mill & Lumber Co., Chicago, III. Mowry, Don E., Sec., Madison Assn. of Commerce, Madison, Wis. Nichol, F. M., Turbine Air Tool Co., Cleveland, Ohio. Norberg, Elizabeth, Portland, Ore. Osborne, A. L., Oshkosh, Wis. (Nat’] Lbr. Mfgrs. Assn.). Paul, C. E., Construction Engineer, National Lbr. Mfgrs. Assn., Chi- cago, III. Peavy, Geo. W., Dean, School of Forestry, Or egon 4 Agric. College, Corvallis, Ore. Peery, Thomas D., Grand Rapids Veneer Works, Grand Rapids, Mich. Peters, T.\G.,, Forest Service, Washington, D.C. A DECENNIAL RECORD 185 oo ———————— Pettibone, G. D., National Assn. of Upholstered Furniture Mfgrs., Chicago, Ill. Philipp. E. L., Governor, Commonwealth of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis. Pratt, C. A., Tacoma, Wash. Prien, J. C., Passenger Agent, C., M. & St. P. Ry., Madison, Wis. Pullen, King H., Southern Pine Assn., New Orleans, La. Quinn, D. L., Chicago Mill & Lumber Co., Chicago, Ill. Quinn, D. L., Mrs., Chicago, Til. Quisna, C. L., Weyerhauser Forest Products, St. Paul, Minn. Padsch, R. M., Thilmany Pulp & Paper Co., Kaukauna, Wis. Rayne, Fred W., Doyon & Rayne Lumber Co., Madison, Wis. Redman, Kenneth, B. F. Sturtevant Co., Chicago, Til. Reiff, E., Casket Mfgrs. Assn. of of America, St. Paul, Minn. Rhodes, E. R., Standard Furniture Co., Herkimer, INGE: Rhodes, J. E., Southern Pine Assn. New Orleans, La. Rice, Claude H., Milwaukee Chair Co., Milwaukee, Wis. Robinson, B. B., Hayes Iona Co., Iona, Mich. Sackett, H. S., Asst. Purchasing Agent, Chi., Milw. & St. Paul, Chi- cago, LIl. Salt, W. S., Container Club, Chicago, Il. Sameit, H. J., Acting Sec., National Implement & Vehicle Assn., Chicago, Il. Sassey, F. L., J. J. Fitzpatrick Lumber Co., Madison, Wis. Schmid, R. V., Kimberley—Clarke Co., Neenah, Wis. Schmidt, H., Elgin Butter Tub Co., Elgin, ne Schorger, A. W., Chemist, C. F. Burgess Laboratories, Madison, Wis. Schorger, Mrs. A. W., Madison, Wis. Schuette, Henry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis. Schuh, J. P., Pres., Schuh—-Mason Lumber Co., Cairo, Tik Schuh, Julius, Mrs., Cairo, Il. Schuh, Margaret, Cairo, Il. Schulte, W. B., C. F. Burgess Laboratories, Madison, Wis. Schultz, Marie, Chicago, Ill. 186 THe Forest Propuctrs LABORATORY Schultz, Otto, Pres., National Piano Mfgrs. Assn. of America, Chi- cago, Ill. Schultz, Otto, Jr., Chicago, Ll. Sensenbrenner, J. Leslie, Kimberly—Clarke Co., Neenah, Wis. Shelly, W. P., Shevlin, Carpenter & Clarke Co., Minneapolis, Minn. Sliger, O., Mengel Co., Louisville, Ky. Slocum, Bert, Madison, Wis. Smith, Kent, Shevlin, Carpenter & Clarke Co., Minneapolis, Minn. Smith, Lowry, Asst. Division Engineer, Northern Pacific R. R., St. Paul, Minn. Smith, M. W., Duiron Co., Dayton, Ohio. Snider, Margaret, Madison, Wis. Sterling, E. D., Yawkey—Bissell Lumber Co., White Lake, Wis. Sterling, Elsie, White Lake, Wis. Stocking, E. J., Central Creosoting Co., Chicago, Ll. Stuart, M. H., National Basket & Fruit Packing Mfgrs. Assn., St. Joseph, Mich. Swan, O. T., Northern Hemlock & Hardwood Assn., Oshkosh, Wis. Swan, O. T., Mrs., Oshkosh, Wis. Tamlin, B. C., National Assn. of Corrugated Fibre Box Mfgrs. Assn., Chicago, III. Taylor, C. M., Pennsylvania & Reading R. R., Port Reading, N. J. Taylor, Hugh K., Editor, “Lumber”, St. Louis, Mo. Taylor, Lucy S., Madison, Wis. Taylor, S. D., Perkins Glue Co., South Bend, Ind. Taylor, W. D., Mrs., Madison, Wis. Thielens, A. B., Studebaker Corp., South Bend, Ind. Thomas, Leon I., Editor, “Factory”, Chicago, Ill. Thompson, P. M., Science Master, Windsor Collegiate C ollege, Windsor, Ontario. Thorkelson, H. J., Business Mgr., Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis. Tiemann, J. H., Mrs., Madison, Wis. Tuttle, L. S., Minneapolis, Minn. (Wholesale Lumber Dealer). Van Camp, EK. E., American Hardwood Mfgrs. Assn., Memphis, Tenn. Van Camp, E. E., Mrs., Memphis, Tenn. A DECENNIAL RECORD 187 Vilas, Dr. C. H., Board of Regents, University of Wisconsin, Mad- ison, Wis. Vogel, Fred A., Pfister & Vogel Co., Milwaukee Wis., Representing “Tanners Council.” Waldron, Eloise, Fargo, North Dakota. Waldron, M. B., Agric. College of North Dakota, Fargo, N. D. Ward, A. F., National Assn. Basket & Fruit Package Mfgrs. Assn., Plymouth, Ind. Weiss, H. F., C. F. Burgess Laboratories, Madison, Wis. Weiss, H. F., Mrs., Madison, Wis. Werbelo, F. C., Shawano Box Co., Shawano, Wis. Wetmore, R. W., Sec’y and Treas., Shevlin Co., Minneapolis, Minn. Wheary, Geo. H., Hartmann Trunk Co., Racine Wis., Representing Baggage Mfers. Assn. Wheaton, W. R., Manager, Pulpwood Co., Appleton, Wis. Wheaton, W. R., Mrs., Appleton, Wis. Wheeler, W. C., Student, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis. White, Thos. A., Pres., Crane & MacMahon, Inc., St. Mary’s, Ohio & St. Mary’s Wheel & Spoke Co., St. Mary’s, Ohio. Windoes, Ralph F., Editor, “Furniture Mfgr. & Artisan”, Grand Rapids, Mich. Winkenwerder, Hugo, University of Washington, Seattle, Wash. Woodford, EK. G., Yawkey—Bissell Lumber Co., White Lake, Wis. Woodford, EK. G., Mrs., White Lake, Wis. Wright, Dorothy, Madison, Wis. Wulpi, M., Plywood Manufacturers’ Assn., Chicago, Il. Yager, Louis, Engineer M. of Way, Northern Pacific R. R., St. Paul, Minn. Yager, Mrs., St. Paul, Minn. Young, Edward J., Foster Creek Lbr. & Mfg. Co., Madison, Wis. Young, Howard S., National Basket & Fruit Pkg. Mfgr. Assn., Indianapolis, Ind. Zelmer, Geo. R., Morgan Co., Oshkosh, Wis. Zelmer, Mr., Jr., Oshkosh, Wis. Zoelle, F. J., Passenger Agent, C. & N. W. Ry., Madison, Wis. Mik A DECENNIAL RECORD FORMER STAFF MEMBERS Forest Propuctrs LABORATORY Left the laboratory prior to July 1, 1920. S. F. Acree Shirley W. Allen Charles IT. Barnum Francis M. Bond H. Stanley Bristol Frank EK. Bonner Samuel Butterman James L.. Brownlee Manager, International Chemical Products Co. Eureka, Montana. Forest Supervisor, Angeles National Forest Los Angeles, California. Wilkesbarre, Pennsylvania. General Manager, Corticelli Silk Mills, Florence, Massachusetts. Department Manager, Baeder-Adamson Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Assistant Chief Engineer, U. S. Forest Service, Washington, D. C. Proprietor, Monarch Textile Company, Chicago, Illinois. Assistant District Engineer, U.S. Forest Service, Denver, Colorado. 189 190 THe Forest Propucts LABORATORY Horace T. Burgess McGarvey Cline Robert E. Cooper Ollison Craig Richard A. Colgan Rufus Crane Clarence W. Coye C. K. Cooperrider Fredrick Dunlap Waynesville, Ohio. Vice-President, Florida Pine Company, Consulting Engineer, Consolidated Naval Stores Co., Jacksonville, Florida. Resident Engineer—Soo Mill, Spanish River Pulp & Paper Co., Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. Research Engineer, Underfeed Stoker Company, Detroit, Michigan. Forester, Diamond Match Co., Chico, Cal. Assistant Professor of Engineering, Ohio Wesleyan University, Deleware, Ohio Technical Expert, W. H. Coye Organization, Grand Rapids, Michigan. Grazing Examiner, U. S. Forest Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico. Consulting Forester, Columbia, Missouri. A DeEcENNIAL REcorD 191 Edward P. Devlin Chemist, Pitcaim Varnish Company, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Arthur J. DeSmidt Confectionery Manufacturer, Oshkosh, Wisconsin. Joseph D. Deihl Vice-Principal, Boys’ Technical High School, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Walter C. Daley Central Waxed Paper Company, Chicago, Illinois. Armin Elmendorf Consulting Engineer, Haskelite Manufacturing Corporation, Chicago, Illinois. Nils B. Eckbo In Charge Kiln Drying Research, Forest Department, Government of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa. Leroy P. Elliott Dean, Vocational Courses, Bradley Polytechnic Institute, Peoria, Illinois. Ernest D. Fahlberg Assistant Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin. Jenness B. Frear Specialist in Boxing and Crating, American Radiator Company, Buffalo, New York. 192 Tue Forest Propucts LABORATORY Clark W. Gould Frank J. Hallauer S. B. Henning Henry J. Hegel M. H. Hostman Eugene EF. Horn Jacob M. Johlin, Jr. John A. Jess Don P. Johnston Forest Examiner, Office of Products, U.S. Forest Service, Portland, Oregon. Edward J. Young, Lumberman, Madison, Wisconsin. Technical Advisor on Gluing Problems, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. In Charge Collection and Claim Divisions, General Electric Company, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Pacific Coast Representative, In Charge of Industrial Sales and Engineering, American Radiator Company, San Francisco, California. Linha Paulista, Estado de Sao Paulo, Brazil. Syracuse, University, Syracuse, New York. Consulting Mining Engineer, Jasper Park Collieries, Limited, Royal Mineral Association, Duluth, Minnesota. General Manager, J ohnston-MeNeil Company, Naval Stores, Okechobee, Florida. A DEcENNIAL RECORD 193 J. Norman Jensen Willam H. Kempfer Simon Kirseh Fredrick W. Kressman Harry N. Knowlton Carl A. Kupfer Jesse B. Kommers James C. Lawrence Joseph P. Mehlig Architectural Engineer, 175 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois. Cattle Rancher, Deer Park, Florida. Botanical Laboratory, MeGill University, Montreal, Canada. Manager, Continental Turpentine and Rosin Company, Laurel, Mississippi. Boxing and Packing Specialist, General Electric Company, Schenectady, New York. California Representative, North Coast Dry Kiln Company, Berkeley, California. Associate Professor of Mechanics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin. President, American Chemical Machinery Co., Chester, Pennsylvania. University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming. 194 Tue Forrest Propucrs LAaBpora tory Leslie R. Morris Kmgineer, Chicago Mill and Lumber Company, Chicago, Illinois. Wilham W. Morris Consulting Forester and Landscape Architect, Pine Bluff, Arkansas. Teodulo J. Medicielo Road Construction Engineer, City of Tacloban, Leyte, Philippine Islands. Samuel Morrell Chief Structural Engineer, Sanitary District of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Edward R. Maurer Professor of Mechanics, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin. George C. McNaughton Plant Superintendent. The Mead Fibre Company, Kingsport, Tennessee. Andrew H. McKenzie Kansas City Fibre Company, Kansas City, Kansas. Charles B. Norris Mechanical Engineer, Development and Maintenance of Plants. Haskelite Manufacturing Corporation, Grand Rapids, Michigan. nnn nee EE A DECENNIAL RECORD 195 er Robert C. Palmer E. W. Peters Robert E. Prince Don L. Quinn S. W. Schorger C. V. Sweet Edwin Sutermeister O. L. Sponsler Louis Suetter Chief Chemist, The Newport Company, Pensacola, Florida. J. Aron & Company, Inc., 95 Wall Street, New York, New York. Superintendent, Adams and Elting Company, Chicago, Illinois. Manager Research Department, Chicago Mill & Lumber Company, Chicago, Illinois. Chemist, The Burgess Laboratories, Madison, Wisconsin. In Charge Lumber and Drying . Research, Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun, U. P. India. Chief Chemist, S. D. Warren Company, Cumberland Mills, Maine. Research Fellow, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California. Technical Expert, W. H. Coye Organization, Grand Rapids, Michigan. 196 Tue Forest Propuctrs Lasoratrory ee ee ee ee eee Clyde H. Teesdale John H. Thickens Clinton K. Textor J. R. Watkins Howard I’. Weiss O. L. E. Weber Lage Wernsted James B. Yule Grand Rapids, Michigan. Vice President and General Manager, The Meade Fibre Company, Kingsport, ‘Tennessee. Chemical Engineer, Northwestern Paper Company, Cloquet, Minnesota. Research Engineer, Chicago Mill and Lumber Company, Chicago, [lnois. ‘Treasurer, The Burgess Laboratories, Madison, Wisconsin. Vice President and General Manager, Watab Paper Company, Sartell, Minnesota. U.S. Forest Service, Portland, Oregon. Assistant Engineer, U.S. Forest Service, Missoula, Montana. ) 5, TH vy San JO ay | tv," re: iis ihoyes x as ATAU TINT 00008980937