gsibescttarscee eed sist shri el nek Siete Satceetteeeion Tapa g Tr Sweeses ted 5 ppeeeese terete ‘, testes Ee sa tapuiaeasiesesee 3 sipisstsretel epce 4¥ 4 7 } Sas wert SPye So eee ence weep eoeaae 5 Bae peg be Pome tne hae de eink bvesed Laden yu =saieieetjaiaenigvere eibsacbpetesbeguesbeorsibe. Rb AS PORE PERC TENE SOT e SaaS SS ae 5 Adarsh 50 52 SF 17 Sitios Seaseese seed agen perenne eee ces coon precede Seger grvaeet Gee CHILDREN OF THE AIR EXCUKSIONS INRO°-THE WORLD OF BUPPEREEIES BY ve Vv SAMUEL HUBBARD SCUDDER BOSTON AND NEW YORK HOUGHTON, MIFFLIN AND COMPANY vue Che Viverside Press, Cambridge 1895 Copyright, 1895, By SAMUEL HUBBARD SCUDDER. All rights reserved. The Riverside Press, Cambridge, Mass., U. S. A. Electrotyped and Printed by H. O. Houghton & Company. NOTE THE following papers are a small selection, for the general reader, of those published in the au- thor’s “ Butterflies of the Eastern United States and Canada,” —a work so costly as to reach rela- tively few, and one which was mainly addressed to the specialist. As far as possible, these papers have been di- vested of technical details and in many cases revised or extended, to bring them up to date. Lach is wholly independent of the others ; but though they do not pretend to form a consistent whole, it is believed that the perusal of these fragments will show, as well as a more elaborate treatise, that there is as much to be learned from the study of the lives and structure of our own every-day but- terflies as can be gleaned in any other branch of natural history. To gain for our butterflies a deeper interest and closer attention on the part of the observing public is the simple object of the present volume. CAMBRIDGE, Mass., April 13, 1895. CONTENTS EXPLANATION OF PLATES } : 5 ; : B Ie II. BUTTERFLIES IN DISGUISE; A STUDY OF MIMICRY THE STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE IN THE GENUS BaAsILARCHIA : 3 : ‘ , 5 DECEPTIVE DEVICES AMONG CATERPILLARS 4 BUTTERFLIES AS BOTANISTS . ; , ; THE NAMES OF BUTTERFLIES . 5 3 ‘ CoLOR-RELATIONS OF CHRYSALIDS TO THEIR SUR- ROUNDINGS . : ; ; , ; : Tue Waite Mountains or NEw HAmpsHIRE AS A HOME FOR BUTTERFLIES : : : BUTTERFLY SOUNDS . é ; : é , NESTS AND OTHER STRUCTURES MADE BY CAT- ERPILLARS 4 : ‘ ; : j : POSTURES OF BUTTERFLIES AT REST AND ASLEEP THE EGGS OF BUTTERFLIES . ; : ‘ PSYCHOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES IN OUR BUTTER- FLIES F : 2 : ; : ; : SOcIAL CATERPILLARS : ‘ : : THE FIXITY OF HABIT IN’ BUTTERFLIES . : How BUTTERFLIES PASS THE WINTER . ; THE OLDEST BUTTERFLY INHABITANTS OF NEW ENGLAND . F ; ; ; : : ‘ PROTECTIVE COLORING IN CATERPILLARS AROMATIC BUTTERFLIES. : ; : ; THE PROCESSION OF THE SEASONS . : ‘ vl CONTENTS XX. THE WAYS OF BUTTERFLIES : é 4 . 181 XXI. BurrERFLIES AT NIGHT AND AT SEA . . I18e XXII. SomE sINGULAR THINGS ABOUT CATERPILLARS . 194 XXIII. WHERE DID THE BUTTERFLIES COMMON TO THE OLD AND THE NEw WORLD ORIGINATE ? 206 XXIV. ANTIGENY; OR SEXUAL DIVERSITY IN BUTTER- FLIES . - ; : : : ; ~ w2i6 XXY. LETHARGY IN CATERPILLARS. : » 226 XXVI. A BUDGET OF CURIOUS FACTS ABOUT CHRYSA- LIDS : : j 5 : : ; » Doe XXVII. DIGONEUTISM IN BUTTERFLIES . ; : » 2a XXVIII. PERIopICIYrY IN THE APPEARANCE OF BUTTER- FLIES. ‘ : , : : : .. Spe XXIX. CoLoR PREFERENCES OF BUTTERFLIES, AND THE ORIGIN OF THEIR COLOR ‘ . ‘ . 256 XXX. THE FRIENDS AND ASSOCIATES OF CATERPILLARS 263 XXXI. BurreERFLIES OF THE PAST . . : - 267 INDEX TO NAMES OF INSECTS. : : : : = 2a EXPLANATION OF PLATES. OPPOSITE PAGE J Plate 1.—BAsILaRcHIA ARTHEMIS . . . gd ay Lane teh meee Fig. 1, Egg magnified; Fig. 2, A spray of itlow with ee feepillars of different ages feeding upon it, two of the youngest on their perches ona detached leaf. The egg, of natural size, is shown at a, a bunch of riffraff at b, and the hibernaculum atc. Fig. 3, Chrysalis. The butterfly is shown on the next plate. Plate 2.— BuTrTERFLIES OF THE WHITE Mountains .. 80 Fig. 1, Pieris oleracea. Fig. 2, Basilarchia arthemis. Fig. 3, Polygonia faunus. /Plate 3.— Nests or BurrerRFLY CATERPILLARS. . . . 104 Fig. 1, Nest of Thanaos juvenalis on scrub-oak. Fig. 2, Nest of young Thanaos persius on poplar. Figs. 3- 5, Nests of Euphoeades troilus at successive stages of growth on spice-bush. Fig. 6, Nest of Epargyreus tity- rus on Gleditschia. Fig. 7, Nest of Aglais milberti, when full grown, on nettle. Fig. 8, Nest of Vanessa huntera on Gnaphalium, formed of the petals entangled in web. Plate 4.— Eccs oF BUTTERFLIES . . . 116 Fig. 1, Pontia protodice. Fig. 2, Bholigoss capallaas F ig. 3, Bunch of eggs of Laertias philenor on a tendril of Aristolochia. Fig. 4, Inverted column of eggs of Po- lygonia interrogationis. Fig. 5, Epargyreustityrus. Fig. 6, Cereyonis nephele. Fig. 7, Speyeria idalia. Fig. 8, Anthocharis genutia. Fig. 9, Brenthis myrina. Fig. 10, Anosia plexippus. Fig. 11, Erora laeta. Fig. 12, Kury- mus philodice. Fig. 13, Rusticus seudderi. Fig. 14, Strymon titus. All the illustrations are magnified, excepting Fig. 3, which is slightly reduced. | Plate 5.— Tue o~pest New ENGLAND BUTTERFLIES . | Plate 6. — Scent-scaALEs OR ANDROCONIA ... vill EXPLANATION OF PLATES. Fig. 1, Brenthis montinus. Figs. 2-5, Egg, caterpillar, chrysalis, and imago of Oeneis semidea. The early stages are more or less enlarged. Fig. 1, From surface of fore-wing of Argynnis aflame Fig. 2, From fold of hind-wings of Laertias philenor. Fig. 3, From surface of fore-wing of Oeneis jutta. Fig. 4, From surface of fore-wing of Cyaniris pseudargiolus. Fig. 5, Pouch on hind-wing of Anosia plexippus, con- cealing androconia. Fig. 6, From surface of fore wing of Pieris oleracea. Fig. 7, Portion of one of the veins of fore-wing of Speyeria idalia, showing tips of feath- ered androconia mingled with the ordinary scales. Fig. 8, Part of surface of fore-wing of Callidryas eubule, showing partially erect andronia. All the drawings are greatly magnified. Plate 7.— BuTTERFLIES comMMON TO Two WortLps Fig. 1, Vanessa cardui. Fig. 2, Euvanessa antiopa. Fig. 3, Vanessa atalanta. Plate 8. —A POLYGONEUTIC AND POLYMORPHIC BuUTTER- FLY, [PHICLIDES AJAX oath) qe ee Fig. 1, The spring brood ( imareollaa): Re 2, The summer Brood (ajax). Plate 9. —CoLORADAN FossiL BuTTERFLIES Fig. 1, Prolibythea vagabunda. Fig. 2, Becbeante figs rissanti. Fig. 3, Jupiteria charon. Fig. 4, Prodryas per- sephone. Fig. 5, Lithopsyche styx. Fig. 6, Apanthesis leuce. Plate 1, Figs. 2,3; Plate 2, Fig. 2; Plate 5, Figs. 3, 4; . 152 ~ 16 208 . 248 . 272 and Plate 8, Fig. 1, are reproduced by the author’s kind permission from Edwards’s “ Butterflies of North Ameriea.’’ FRAIL CHILDREN OF THE AIR I. BUTTERFLIES IN DISGUISE; A STUDY OF MIMICRY EvERY observer, even the most casual, has .at some time had his attention arrested by the strange resemblance of some creature to the object upon which it rested; to this form of imitation the term “mimicry ’ was applied as long ago as 1815 by Kirby and Spence, in the introductory letter to their treatise on entomology. “You would de- clare,” say they, “upon beholding some insects, that they had robbed the trees of their leaves to form for themselves artificial wings, so exactly do they resemble them in their form, substance, and vascular structure ; some representing green leaves, and others those that are dry and withered. Nay, sometimes this mimicry is so exquisite that you ‘would mistake the whole insect for a portion of the branching spray of a tree.” It is not a little curious that it was on the very 2 BUTTERFLIES IN DISGUISE eve of the publication of the “ Origin of Species,” at the meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, in 1859, that the first attempt was made to collect facts of this nature, and to inquire into the laws which regulate them. At this meeting the late Mr. Andrew Murray read a paper upon the “ Disguises of Nature,” in which he showed that the most perfect imitation of in- animate objects occurs, not rarely or exceptionally, but in some groups so commonly that the want of it might be regarded as the exception, and that the concealment of the animal was the plain purpose of the disguise. He confesses, however, that he cannot tell what law has set in motion such end- less provision of protection, and can only suggest that it may be found in some force analogous to the great law of attraction; that “like draws to like, or like begets like.” The theory of natural selection, immediately afterward proposed by Darwin, was the key to this puzzle. Its use for this purpose by Bates, in 1862, was one of the earliest independent contri- butions to the theory from new observations. Buried in the depths of a special systematic paper, there were presented by Bates some of the most striking instances that are known of such A STUDY OF MIMICRY 3 protective resemblance, in which the animals imi- tate, not the objects on or near which they live, nor such other creatures as are in themselves frightful or predaceous, but butterflies quite like themselves, to all external appearance as harmless and as much in need of protection as they. He pointed out, moreover, that there is a special group of butterflies (Heliconinae), of vivid coloring and slow and easy flight, which are the constant sub- jects of mimicry, while the greater portion of the mimicking butterflies he observed belonged to a very different group (Pieriae), normally white and tolerably uniform in color, but which had so changed their livery and even the form of their wings as closely to resemble the objects they mim- icked in brilliancy of color and variegation, and even in mode of flight. Some, says he, “ show a minute and palpably intentional likeness which is perfectly staggering.” Indeed, the likeness proved so close that even after he became aware of the mimicry his practiced eye was often deceived. Or if he wandered to a new locality, where occurred a new set of Ithomyiae (the most numerously repre- sented among the mimicked genera), the Lepta- lides (the mimickers) would vary with them so as to preserve the mockery band for band and spot ——————————————————————EEE—See + BUTTERFLIES IN DISGUISE for spot. Now his field observations showed him that the mimicking species belonged to a group of butterflies very subject to attack by birds and other foes, while the group which they mimicked had an offensive odor and apparently a taste obnoxious to insectivorous animals, so as to be exempt practically from their attacks. This was shown partly by their exceptional abundance, which did not seem to accord with slow and easy flight and conspicuous coloring, features that nat- urally would render them an easy prey to their enemies. That these butterflies were truly dis- tasteful to birds has been shown again and again. Thus Belt says, in his “ Naturalist in Nicara- gua” :— “T had an opportunity of proving in Brazil that some birds, if not all, reject the Heliconii butterflies, which are closely resembled by butterflies of other families and by moths. I observed a pair of birds that were bringing butterflies and dragonflies to their young, and although the Heliconii swarmed in the neighborhood, and are of weak flight, so as to be easily caught, the birds never brought one to their nest. I had a still bet- ter means of testing both these and other insects that are mimicked in Nicaragua. The tame, white-faced monkey I have already mentioned was extremely fond of insects, A STUDY OF MIMICRY 5 and would greedily munch up any beetle or butterfly given to him, and I used to bring him any insects that I found imitated by others, to see whether they were distasteful or not. I found he would never eat the Heli- conil. He was too polite not to take them when they were offered to him, and would sometimes smell them, but invariably rolled them up in his hand, and dropped them quietly again after a few minutes. A large spe- cies of spider (Nephila) also used to drop them out of its web when I put them into it. Another spider that frequented flowers seemed to be fond of them, and I have already mentioned a wasp that caught them to store its nest with. ‘There could be no doubt, however, from the monkey’s actions, that they were distasteful to 33 him. Bates very naturally argued that if these offen- sive properties gave the Ithomyiae such exemption from attack as enabled them to swarm in spite of lazy habits and brilliant coloring, then other but- terflies living in the same places would gain a cer- tain amount of freedom from attack if their flight and coloring so nearly resembled those of the offen- sive species as actually to deceive insect-eating ani- mals, even though they were themselves in no way distasteful. The fact of a resemblance so close that it is to 6 BUTTERFLIES IN DISGUISE all appearances a “palpably intentional likeness” is impossible to question. But how explain it? How could a butterfly change its appearance to such a degree, its wings from a uniform color to a banded, streaked, and spotted pattern, and at the same time lengthen their form and extend the an- tennae? ‘Can the Ethiopian change his skin or the leopard his spots?” The answer, as Bates clearly saw, was to be looked for in the same direction as when account- ing for the assumption by animals of the color of their surroundings. Both are produced in the same way, and have the same cause and end. It is only by keeping in view this tolerably obvious truth that we can explain all the freaks of mim- icry. ‘The specific, mimetic analogies,” says Bates, “are adaptations, — phenomena of pre- cisely the same nature as those in which insects . are assimilated in superficial appearance to the vegetable or inorganic substance on which or amongst which they live.” To gain an idea, then, of the processes by which the “staggering” examples of mimicry are pro- duced, we must look first at the simplest forms of protective resemblance. Go to the seashore and observe the grasshoppers among the beach grass. A STUDY OF MIMICRY T They fly up at your approach, whiz off a rod or so, and alight. Can you see them? They are col- ored so nearly like the sands they live upon that detection of one at rest is almost impossible. On yonder grassy bluff, a stone’s throw away, you will find none of them, but other kinds equally, or almost equally, lost to sight by their harmony with their surroundings. What chance of life for either if they suddenly changed places? They would be so conspicuous that every passing bird or other insectivorous creature would sight them. Of course these protective colors have been gained by slow steps. Every grasshopper that found its preferred food among the sands was liable to be eaten. In the long run just those would be eaten which were most easily seen. One which varied in coloring in never so small a degree, so as to be less easily seen than his brother, would live to perpetuate his kind, and his brother come to an untimely end; the pro- geny would show the fortunate variation, and be more likely to be spared to transmit in increased volume the probability of the happy coloring. Given, then, a brood of grasshoppers that find their preferred food in sandy spots, and unless other and more powerful forces act upon them it must result, from their lability to be eaten by 8 BUTTERFLIES IN DISGUISE creatures fond of grasshoppers, that in time they will resemble in coloring the sand on which they live; it is impossible that they should not. Any creature not specially protected by nauseousness, or habit, or special device of some sort, must in the very nature of things, if it is to live at all, have some other protection, and that afforded by color and pattern is by far the most common. The world is made up of eaters and eaten, of devices to catch and devices to avoid being caught. We may apply the same reasoning to two kinds of butterflies subject naturally to the same class of enemies ; that is, living in the same region and flying at the same time. If one has the slightest advantage over the other in the fight for life, by being, for instance, distasteful to one class of com- mon enemies, so that these forbear to attack it after experiment or by instinct (the result of ances- tral experiments), and there be among the less favored flock, here and there, an individual which, under circumstances favoring it, such as distance or shadow, may more often than its fellows be mistaken by the enemy for one of its distasteful neighbors through its possession of a little more than usual of a certain tint on a part of the wing, a little larger spot here, or more of the sem- A STUDY OF MIMICRY 9 blance of a band there, — how small soever this difference may be, it must, by the very laws of natural selection, be cherished, perpetuated, in- creased, by slow but sure steps. Nor is there any limit to its increase except its absolute deception of the enemy. So long as there is the slightest advantage in variation in a definite possible direc- tion, the struggle for existence will compel that variation. Knowing what we now know of the laws of life, mimicry of favored races might even have been predicted. It is to be presumed that the actual colors found in a mimicking butterfly are, with rare exceptions, such as existed somewhere in the ancestral form. In the case of our own mimicking Basilarchia, for example, whose orange ground tint is so totally at variance with the general color of the other nor- mal members of the group, it will be observed that all the normal species possess some orange. With- out this as a precedent fact, such perfect mimicry might perhaps never have arisen. Individuals among the normal species vary somewhat in this particular, so that it is easy to suppose that some of the original B. archippus, with more orange than usual, may have escaped capture, on occasion, from this cause. From such a small beginning, 10 BUTTERFLIES IN DISGUISE such as one may now see every year in B. asty- anax, sprang doubtless the whole story, and at last we find a butterfly which has for a ground color of both surfaces of the wings an orange which is the exact counterpart of that of Anosia plexippus ; by reason of which, in all probability, it enjoys a freedom from molestation comparable ‘to that at- tributed to plexippus, so that it ventures more into the open country than its allies, and thus gains a wider pasturage and surer subsistence. It would seem, then, to be plain that all cases of protective coloring and mimetic form come under one and the same law, and have been produced by the same means (the survival of the best mocker), whether the subject imitated be animal, vegetable, or mineral. The actual outcome is, indeed, vastly more surprising in some cases than in others, — in some “perfectly staggering,” as Bates says ; yet though there be to all appearances a “ palpably intentional likeness,” there is found to be no inten- tion in the case so far as mocker and mocked are concerned, but the result of a natural selection against which neither could even strive, and of which neither was ever conscious.1 The process 1 “Tmitation” and “mimicry ” both imply intention ; but the limits of our language compel us to use figurative speech ; we have no word to express unconscious mimicry. A STUDY OF MIMICRY 11 has been a long one, so that in the case of para- static mimicry, as that form which involves the copying of one’s fellows might be termed (or, if one prefers an English term, neighborly mimicry), we may readily presume far less difference between mocker and mocked when the mimicry between them first began than now exists between the mocked and the normal relatives of the mocker. It is argued, indeed, with great show of reason, that as the resemblance grew stronger the birds became more sharp-sighted, which reflected again on the mimicry, and that thus the final departure from the normal type was intensified; but this assumption is not necessary. So far we have referred only to the first illustra- tions of mimicry given by Bates, those which pre- sent the simplest, though not the least striking forms, involving as they do the widest departure of mimetic butterflies from their normal type. Let us glance briefly at some other points. A new element enters when we find that neigh- borly mimicry is sometimes confined to a single sex of a butterfly; that is to say, one sex is of the normal color of its allies, while the opposite sex departs widely therefrom, and is found to resemble closely another and a nauseous butterfly of the 12 BUTTERFLIES IN DISGUISE same region. Now, as mimicry is clearly only a protective device, or rather outcome, we should naturally inquire whether either sex was more in need than the other of protection from those foes against which mimicry could avail anything. Plainly, it would be the female, since, were she lost before oviposition, just so many eggs would be lost with her; and besides this, her heavier, more sluggish flight —a necessity from her burden of egos — makes her an easier prey to imsectivorous creatures against which mimicry is aimed. Ac- cordingly, we find many instances in which the female is mimetic and the male normal. Probably they are far more numerous than we imagine, and many of the exceedingly common differences be- tween the sexes, which since Darwin’s day we have been wont to set down to sexual selection, doubt- less are to be attributed to something of this na- ture. But there is no known case of parastatic mimicry confined to the male sex. On the other hand, some of the most vivid and striking exam- ples of mimicry are to be found confined to the females. There is one example brought forward by Trimen which is the most surprising yet pub- lished, where not only have two kinds of African swallow-tail butterflies, one with, the other with- A STUDY OF MIMICRY 138 out tails, long supposed to be widely distinct species, been proved to be male and female, the female departing from the type to mimic a Ku- ploeid butterfly, but the male is found to have no less than three distinct wives, each mimicking a different kind of Euploeid characteristic of the region inhabited by mocker and mocked, and each very different from the husband; while an allied male, formerly thought to be the same as the pre- ceding, keeps a similar harem, similarly mimetic of species of Kuploeinae prevailing in its districts, and, besides, has in one place at least a concubine which is not at all mimetic. Surely the play of mimicry can go little farther. But in all this arises a new difficulty. How is it that mimetic qualities, which in a given locality breed so true, are inherited by one sex only? Why do the males escape? Here the question is not, Why are the females mimetic? but rather, Why are the males not mimetic? To this no sat- isfactory answer has yet been given. It has been attributed to sexual selection, the females being supposed to be of a conservative frame of mind, and admitting no variation in their consorts; but this it would be difficult to prove, or, it seems to me, to render very probable. 14 BUTTERFLIES IN DISGUISE This, however, is the view of it taken by Belt, who remarks that “it is supported by the fact that many of the males of the mimetic Leptalides have the upper half of the lower wing of a pure white, whilst all the rest of the wings is barred and spot- ted with black, red, or yellow, like the species they mimic. The females have not this white patch, and the males usually conceal it by covering it with the upper wing, so that I cannot imagine its being of any other use to them than as an attraction in courtship, when they exhibit it to the females, and thus gratify their deep-seated preference for the normal color of the order [tribe] to which the Leptalides belong.” Still another difficulty besets the subject, —a difficulty in part recognized by Bates. It has been the subject of much discussion, but on the principles supported above is far more easily dis- posed of. Bates found not only that the distaste- ful Heliconoid butterflies were mimicked by those which were in evident need of protection, from the fact of their being greedily eaten by insectivorous animals, but that there were cases of mimicry quite as close among the Heliconoid butterflies them- selves. Many instances of the same kind have since been recognized in other parts of the world. A STUDY OF MIMICRY 15 Here both mocked and mockers were protected by nauseousness, and it was by no means clear to him how any advantage, the fundamental cause of variation of this kind, was to be gained by such imitation. The resemblance was so close that, according to his own words, “species belonging to distinct genera have been confounded, owing to their being almost identical in colors and mark- ings ; in fact, many of them can scarcely be dis- tinguished except by their generic characters.” Bates himself was inclined to look upon these, not as cases of parastatic mimicry, but as due “to the similar adaptation of all to the same local, probably inorganic conditions.” But this vague explanation has not been satis- factory to others, and Wallace and Meldola, and particularly Fritz Muller, have followed the mat- ter, and shown that, if the mimicked species possesses the slightest advantage in the mere point of numbers over the mimicking, this advan- tage is sufficient to produce the mimicry con- eerned. It is highly probable, from the experi- ments of Fritz Miller and the observations of Belt, that the Heliconoid butterflies are simply distasteful, not poisonous, to insectivorous animals. Muller has even figured a considerable number of 16 BUTTERFLIES IN DISGUISE examples of a single species found by him (in this instance belonging to the Acraeinae, a closely allied nauseous group) in which the wings had evidently been seized by insectivorous birds, for they show great gaps in their wings, such as a bill would make upon them. By such seizures many of the distasteful butterflies doubtless per- ish, and Meldola shows very clearly by mathe- matical analysis that a resemblance between two species so close that the experimental seizures would be divided between them in the ratio of their numbers gives an advantage decidedly in favor of the scarcer species. Or, as Wallace puts it, “if two species, both equally distasteful, closely resemble each other, then the number of individuals sacrificed is divided between them in the proportion of the squares of their respective numbers.” If the rarer species is only one tenth as numerous, it will benefit in the proportion of one hundred to one. Exactly the same argument can be applied to examples of mimicry between two species where neither is distasteful. These cases, though less conspicuous, are probably more numerous than those of which we have been speaking; for, on the principles that we have laid down, any advan- A STUDY OF MIMICRY 17 tage which one species has over another will be attacked by that other in every possible way ; and if there be elements in the structure or mark- ings which admit of a closer resemblance between the two, and this resemblance will lessen the disadvantage under which the weaker species labors, then in the very nature of things that resemblance must follow, unless other opposing elements intervene. For here, at least, the rela- tive abundance of the species concerned is an essential element. It has been thought by some to be also an essential element of all mimicry; but not only is there no sufficient reason for holding such a view, excepting in cases like those last quoted, but it has been asserted by no less keen an observer than Fritz Miller himself, and agreed to by others, that the mimicked species is not always more abundant than its counter- feit; indeed, the mimicking and the mimicked species have been found to vary in their relative numbers in different localities, sometimes the one, sometimes the other, preponderating. But with regard to mimicry of one distasteful butterfly by another, there may also enter another element; for it is hardly to be believed that all distasteful butterflies are equally objectionable to all birds, 18 BUTTERFLIES IN DISGUISE and it is obvious that the more distasteful the butterfly is to its rapacious foes, by so much more has it the advantage in the struggle for life; so that mimicry of one distasteful butterfly by another less distasteful is scarcely more surprising than the mimicry of a nauseous butterfly by one that has not this quality. Only one further difficulty remains, and this is that, in a few instances, an insect has been found differing so peculiarly from its congeners as to leave no doubt in the mind that it differs in the direction of mimicry when no exact proto- type can be found. For example, the butterfly of one,of the Nymphalinae, with normal dark colors and a definite pattern, will vary altogether from that pattern and coloring, to take on the Nivery peculiar to the Euploeinae, a group very extensively imitated, when there is found in the regions inhabited by this supposed mimicking species no Euploeid which it in any way specially resembles. In this case but two explanations have been offered: one that the mimicked butter- fly has not yet been found, another that it has for some cause become extinct. But with the extinction of the mimicked form we should ex- pect speedy extinction of the mimicking, and it A STUDY OF MIMICRY 19 would seem more probable that these were cases of general mimicry in process of formation toward some specific type. At any rate, we need to know more definitely about these instances before we can properly discuss them. They have never been collated. In support of the general theory of mimicry, it may be said that cases are far more common in the tropics than in temperate regions, even relatively ; and so, too, are insectivorous animals. The accounts of travelers in the tropics constantly mention the attacks of birds upon butterflies, while instances of butterflies being seen pursued by birds are vastly more rare in the temperate regions. I have never seen one. In the tropics, moreover, the birds are aided by a great number of other insectivorous animals, such as_ lizards. In our own country, therefore, we should not look for many instances of mimicry of any decided type. The most striking is unquestionably that of Basilarchia archippus, which mimics Anosia plexippus, and the closely related case of Basi- larchia eros and Tasitia berenice, the last two butterflies largely supplanting the first two on the peninsula of Florida. In both these instances the mimicry is enjoyed by both sexes. A third 20 BUTTERFLIES IN DISGUISE case is found in the less close but still striking mimicry of our Red-spotted Purple (Basilarchia astyanax) by the female of Semnopsyche diana, an instance the more remarkable as the mimicked species belongs to the same genus as our two other mimicking forms. | When we take a general view of mimicry as exhibited by one butterfly for another, how strange it seems; and what an interesting illus- tration it is of the adaptability and pliancy of natural forces, that for the evident protection of one species in the struggle for existence so exact and beautiful a resemblance should be brought about! Consider for a moment that the subjects of mimicry are at the final stage of life; they have already passed through nearly all the dan- gers to which the species as a species is sub- jected, — so rudely subjected that they are mdeed but a centesimal, or even less, rarely or never more, of those brought into the world with them. During the early period of their life they were exposed to vastly more dangers than they can now experience. At times they were absolutely helpless, without the power of movement. They are now endowed with powers of flight sufficient to thwart the purpose of many a foe; yet it is in eee ee ee ae A STUDY OF MIMICRY 21 just this period that these special and extraor- dinary provisions for their safety and for the accomplishment, so far as the species is concerned, of the end of their life are given them. All this has been brought about for the sole purpose of prolonging their aerial life for the exceedingly few days which are necessary for pairing and the deposition of eggs. ‘The more we contemplate so strange and perfect a provision, and the means by which it is accomplished, the more are we impressed with the capabilities of natural selec- tion, and begin to comprehend how powerful an element it has been in the development of the varied world of beauty about us. Il. THE STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE IN THE GENUS BASILARCHIA THE power of reproduction conceded, the univer- sal instinct for self-preservation is the fundamental and controlling principle by which the perpetuation of any kind of animal is successfully reached. The uncontrollable maternal instinct of self-sacrifice existing in some creatures alone overmasters it, and this exists only in the higher animals, which, com- pared with the great mass, are but few in number ; and is then in most cases called into play only when the creature’s life-work is nearly finished. No such instinct occurs among butterflies, nor is In any way likely to be found, so that “ self-preservation”” and ‘“‘perpetuation of the species” are here, at least through all but the closing days of life, practically equivalent terms. The “struggle for existence” in the species and in the individual are largely con- vertible terms. This struggle is the perpetual inheritance of the individual. ‘The individual inherits alike its struc- THE GENUS BASILARCHIA 23 ture and its habits of life, which latter are very largely, perhaps almost absolutely, dependent on its structure; its tastes and its propensities; its fears and its devices to circumvent its enemies; all its instincts, which are to a great extent, pos- sibly wholly, the entailment of ancestral habits ; its very attitudes, whether at rest or in motion. Its advantages and its disadvantages are thus alike its legacy; so too the peculiar means it em- ploys to disembarrass itself of these disadvantages. This is especially true of the insect in its ear- lier stages, where freedom to change the immediate surroundings is exceedingly limited or altogether impossible, except so far as there is foresight, or an instinct marvelously akin to foresight, on the part of the creature in an antecedent stage. It is of more than usual interest to study the means of self-preservation in the genus Basilarchia, since there is hardly another genus of our butter- flies where throughout its entire life the insect is apparently so exposed to its enemies. They are all, of their kind, conspicuous objects even to our dull eyes, and more than that they are, with the ex- ception of the chrysalis, always found in unusually conspicuous situations. How then do they manage to escape their keen-sighted foes, the birds; or 94 THE STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE their wakeful, indefatigable, persistent enemies among the insect tribes, —ichneumons, ants, wasps, flies, mites, and spiders ? Take first the egg-stage. Every one who has attempted to rear butterflies knows what immense destruction falls to the lot of any species at this stage of its life. Ants and spiders look on eggs as delicacies made for their delectation, and there is a whole group of tiny Hymenoptera, almost too small to breathe, one would think, mere specks, which live solely upon insects’ eggs, piercing them with their egg-darts, their progeny living imprisoned and feeding on the contents until they have run the eycle of their changes. Some attack whole batches of eggs, laying one egg in each, so that one parasite may destroy the entire brood of one butterfly ; others lay their all in one or two eggs, and it is to this class that those belong which sting the eggs of Basilarchia. How does Basilarchia escape this danger? In the first place, the mother rarely lays more than one egg in one spot or even on one bush, though as many as a dozen or two may occasionally be found, where the butterfly’s numbers are great and they are growing as it were imprudent. Then it must be remembered that these parasitic flies must be guided less by vision than by touch; and IN THE GENUS BASILARCHIA 25 again, that most insect eggs are laid on the broader parts of the leaf on which the young will feed; it is here that the parasite will range in quest of prey; but the eggs of Basilarchia are rarely found except at the extreme tips of leaves, and in addition the leaves of the food-plants con- cerned are all acuminate, some to an excessive ex- tent, as in some of the poplars and birches. When the parasite has, however, found an egg, it may well be inquired whether she would not be deceived by it. It differs from the eggs of all our other butter- flies in that it is besprinkled with little flexible fila- ments, for all the world like the hairs of some leaves. Or if the clothing of the eggs did not deceive, she might even then find it difficult of attack, for minute as these parasites are, less than half a milli- metre long, their bodies would extend across at least three of the polygonal cells which regularly stud the surface of the egg, and which send forth these little filaments at every angle, so that poor bewildered Madame must struggle through a weary chaparral before she can attain the barren grounds at the summit and find a spot to readily insert her sting. Yet that she succeeds is only too evi- dent to the collector ; the larger part of the eggs obtained in the open field which have fallen into my hands have been parasitized. 26 THE STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE This is its but too partial defense against its special enemies. But how about those wandering buccaneers, the ants, mites, and spiders? These labor under the same visual defects as the direct parasites, or sometimes greater ones; and the position of the egg, remote from their usual hunt- ing-ground, must serve as no inconsiderable pro- tection; how great, there are hardly means of measurement. Their greatest protection from these savages, which cannot fly but must wander cease- lessly about on foot in search of prey with satanic energy, is undoubtedly in the fewness of their num- ber on one plant. The spider that finds two eggs ofa Basilarchia in one day must be an excellent hunter. Escaped at last from these dangers, which only last at the most ten days, the caterpillar crawls forth from its prison and begins its active life. It is a scrawny, juiceless looking thing, all covered with warts, and less than any other newly born caterpillar would seem a tempting morsel even to an ichneumon or a spider. Yet both make havoe with it at this time. Toa wandering ichneumon contact with an empty egg-shell would probably mean, as a result of its inherited wisdom, that some nice young caterpillar was about, and the neighborhood would be all the more, thoroughly IN THE GENUS BASILARCHIA 27 ransacked. Caterpillars devouring their egg-shells, and so not leaving this “ scent” behind them, would oftenest escape, and by degrees this habit would be perpetuated and fixed; and so it is here; almost invariably the caterpillar hastens to destroy its former prison walls, which it devours to the very base, too closely glued to the leaf to be eaten; probably it breathes more freely when that is done. But where does it now find itself? Its food at its very feet, — yes; but in the most exposed posi- tion possible. Atop the extreme tip of one of the outmost leaves of a spray that projects most freely into the sun and air, just where it can most easily be seen by the passer by ; this seems to be the case nine times out often. It is, however, probably the safest place from the prowling spiders; but surely not from its flying enemies. What does it do? Retreat down the leaf? That would be only to exchange one danger for another, and on its way to a presumed place of safety it would be more sure of detection, because a moving object in nature is always most easily noticed. No, it eats the nearest bit of leaf down to but not including the midrib, first on one side and then on the other, and then retires to near the tip of the midrib, to digest it ; subsequent meals it takes in the same way, moving 28 THE STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE with excessive deliberation along its narrow path and retiring always to the same spot. On this perch it cannot be seen from below, and from the sides and above seems almost or wholly a part of the denuded midrib to which it clings; more par- ticularly when the leaves are in motion by the wind, as they usually are on the trees on which it feeds, particularly in the case of the aspen. That this mode of life is on the whole an advan- tage to it is rendered probable from the fact that there are two cases known, in which it is followed very closely by caterpillars of the moth (Noto- donta) feeding on the very same plant as species of butterflies with this habit (one in Europe and one in America) ; while the caterpillars of Basilarchia employ a further device, the actual import of which has been a puzzle. Very soon after birth, when it has eaten but a very few swaths down the leaf, the little fellow constructs a small and loose packet from minute bits of leaf and other rejectamenta, loosely fastened to one another and to the midrib, close to but scarcely touching the eaten edge of the leaf; and as fast as the leaf is eaten, it removes this packet (continually added to until it becomes about as big as a small pea) farther and farther down the mid- rib away from its perch, always keeping it near the IN THE GENUS BASILARCHIA 29 eaten edge. Itshould be noted that it is so loosely attached, the bits of leaf at all possible angles, that it is moved by the least breath. Meanwhile the cat- erpillar has been growing larger and more conspic- uous and is thus in greater peril from its enemies. There are two possible services that this odd packet may render. A spider wandering over the leaf and observing its motion may seize it and thinking it has a prize, hurry away with it and leave its archi- tect unharmed. ‘This seems to me rather a strained suggestion, for a wandering spider would probably proceed to investigate it on the spot. Another explanation seems more probable. It should be remembered that the leaves preferred by these creatures as food are mostly such as are easily shaken by the wind, and as the caterpillar moves with the leaf and with all the surrounding leaves (in a continual fluttering in the case of the trem- bling aspen, and to a less degree in the other food- plants), this of itself is a protection to it, as it would more readily escape observation as an object distinct from the leaves, all being in motion to- gether ; but on the more stable leaves, like the willow and especially the Rosaceae and the oaks, the motion in a feeble wind would not be sufficient to be serviceable, and here at least the packet 30 THE STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE comes into play. An object in motion among others at rest is a most noticeable thing, a fact well recognized among animals, as a host of them show when they fear being seen. This packet attached by loose silken threads moves, as stated, with a breath of wind and so would distract atten- tion from its architect near by, who has taken pains to place it at the farthest remove from his perch, while still (to avoid undesirable steps) on his daily track. If this be really its object, it is surely one of the oddest devices in nature. The species of Basilarchia all pass the winter while in the caterpillar state and but partly grown. The caterpillar has moulted at least once (devour- ing its cast-off clothing, by the way, doubtless that it may not attract attention) and has to prepare against the inclement season. This it does in a very shrewd way, which is all the more remark- able because no trace or semblance of it is seen in caterpillars of the broods that attain their entire growth in the same season. When the proper time approaches, warned thereto possibly by the dryness of its food, or by the cooler nights, the caterpillar constructs a little nest, sometimes from the still unfinished leaf on which it was born, sometimes from one which it prepares specially at IN THE GENUS BASILARCHIA ol greater pains; this is done by eating away or biting off the unnecessary parts, and leaving on either side of the base of the leaf little flaps just large enough, when drawn together, bottom side up and meeting above, to form a cylinder into which it can squeeze; a projecting shelf is also left beyond the opening, on which it may stand when ready to crawl in, and upon which it may back out in the spring ; the whole of the inside and the upper surface of the shelf are then plastered over with a dense coating of brown silk and the flaps drawn together ; more than that, with strangest foresight, the petiole of the leaf is thoroughly fastened to the stem by numberless threads passed carefully and tightly around both ; into this cylinder it then crawls head foremost, completely filling the cavity, closing the beveled hinder opening with the sloping tuberculate and sharpened terminal seg- ments, sure to find itself there when the long night of winter is passed. No, not quite sure, for a wasp or some other predaceous insect will sometimes tear this fine castle open and destroy its single occu- pant. Whether it is an additional safeguard or not, it is an instructive fact that, at least where the winters are most severe, nearly all these hibernacula are made out of leaves so near the ' : ' 1 32 THE STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE ground that the snow covers them with its warm- ing mantle; and what is more, in certain cases they so closely resemble the winter buds and bursting leaves of the new year that they must sometimes deceive their prowling foes of the early spring. Shortly after it again appears in the spring and has fed on the tender buds and just opening leaves, it moults again, usually upon the shelf of its hibernaculum, but no longer devours its skin, as it quits the immediate neighborhood. It now changes its livery as well and is a most extraor- dinary looking object, withal very conspicuous. Dark and light green and cream color strive for the mastery and leave it streaked and blotched, so that it bears no inconsiderable resemblance, in color at least, to the droppings of some birds, a circumstance which doubtless serves it as some sort of protection. Its body is humped and the bosses bear tubercles which give it a somewhat repulsive aspect; especially a pair a little behind the head are raised aloft, thickly studded with prominences, the effect of which is heightened by the creature’s habit of arching this part of the body, bending its head to the ground and raising aloft its hinder part, also studded with roughened BASILARCHIA ARTHEMIS IN THE GENUS BASILARCHIA 393 processes. Altogether it is a rather hideous beast. Then too, if disturbed, it raises the front half of its body from the ground and uses it as a kind of whiplash, throwing it to one side and the other with great violence. When it walks, it moves with a slow and cautious tread, its head trembling as if it had the palsy. All this is doubtless to inspire fear to such enemies as might be tempted to attack it, but to how much avail we can hardly tell. It is certainly attacked in considerable numbers by a parasitic hymenopteron, the young of which live within on the juices of the body and escape from the chrysalis when that is formed. The chrysalis, helpless thing, probably hangs quite exposed upon the stem of the plant which has given the caterpillar nourishment. We know it almost entirely from those raised in confine- ment. It has an oddly shaped form, with a great projection on the back like a Roman nose, and is of a dark green or greenish brown color varied with cream color, and smooth as if varnished. This makes it appear like a hanging lump of bird dung, and so again must often prevent its being picked off and devoured by some hungry bird. 34 THE STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE When one that has at last escaped all the perils of its youth finally reaches its full development, it is even more conspicuous and exposed than before. Although now upon the wing and no doubt often able to escape a pursuer by some quick movement, its natural flight is not swift, and its ordinary movements on the wing are a few quick flutters followed by a sailing motion which is most favor- able to capture. Its colors differ of course in the different kinds, and they may in this particular be divided into two classes. One effects a deep rich black-blue or blackish purple, and is varie- gated with light blue and white, the latter partly in the form of bands, on some forming a broad bow across both wings, rendering them most conspic- uous and striking objects. They are, too, of a pretty large size, and as they fly mostly in the neighborhood of copses or along shaded roadsides or forest roads, they seem to render themselves by the contrasting background as conspicuous as possible. Another class is of an orange brown color of greater or less depth, while the veins are black, and a black stripe, sometimes accompanied by white dots, crosses the wings. These fly in more open places, more fully exposed to the sun, and are scarcely less conspicuous than their IN THE GENUS BASILARCHIA 30 fellows. All these butterflies live a considerable time, and indeed the eggs do not mature in the bodies of the females until they have been a fort- night on the wing; and then they do not lay all their eggs at once, or even within a few days, but prolong the operation over many days or even several weeks. ‘To deposit all her eggs therefore, which is the province of course of the female, she must fly amid all the dangers her conspicuous colors offer for about a month, a considerably longer time than the average of butterflies. Pre- vious to egg-laying at least, much of her time is spent upon the ground in company with her fellows, often in great flocks, engrossed in sucking up moisture from the damp earth, from decaying fruits, or the droppings of beasts; and so must become a conspicuous and easy prey to her enemies. What then is to become of this saving remnant of the tribe? How escape from the dangers which it seems to invite? For the individual there would seem to be nothing but chance; but the number of eggs laid under the most favorable circumstances or chances is very considerable ; and if only a pair of these finally reaches maturity and are able to fulfill their functions, the number of individuals of the species is maintained. It would 36 THE STRUGGLE FOR EXISTENCE seem, however, as if even this chance were small and as if still further protection were needed. And one further protection seems to be afforded in some species in a peculiarity of their life history. Apparently the species of Basilarchia are, at least in New England, normally single brooded; but in not infrequent cases, doubtless more frequent in southern than in northern parts, a second or supplementary brood is formed in one season ; as the butterfly lays eggs for some time, and all the females are not born at once, the earliest progeny of the earliest females may not infrequently be able to mature in the same season in time for the production of a second brood. This would seem to be a provision on the part of nature to give the species a better chance. That they need it is perhaps evidenced by the fact that the black-veined orange species, which are almost universally more numerous in individuals than the others, have, in regions where one brood is the normal condition of their fellows, always two broods. But this is not the only advantage the black- veined orange species have, so that we cannot fairly ascribe their greater numbers to this alone. Their very colors are an advantage to them, for in them they mimic species of another group, the IN THE GENUS BASILARCHIA ot Euploeinae, which possess a taste and perhaps an odor offensive to birds and other insectivorous animals ; the mimicry is very striking indeed, and is the more remarkable from the fact that the northern species resembles the only species of Euploeinae found in the region it inhabits, while the southern species as well as the southernmost examples of the northern species resemble another which is more common in the region they inhabit. It is indeed possible that one of the normally colored species of Basilarchia, one that has least conspicuously contrasted colors, though resplendent with blue and green, is specially protected by the various other devices we have recounted; for certainly it is itself mimicked by one sex of a butterfly of another very distinct group, viz., Semnopsyche diana. ITT. DECEPTIVE DEVICES AMONG CATERPILLARS THE life of a caterpillar is full of perils from birth to maturity. Though often formidable to look at, it is nevertheless soft skinned. Though it may have a choice place of concealment or even a well constructed nest, it must roam at large while seeking food; and there are several periods of its life when, to undergo its ecdysis, it must remain an entire day or even more, motionless and help- less and generally quite exposed. Its main pur- pose in life, next to feeding, is not to be seen. One of the simplest devices to escape notice is that of confining all activities (which include with these gluttons scarcely anything but feeding) to the night-time and retiring to some concealment during the day. This is a very common occur- rence with the Satyrinae and Argynnini in partic- ular, the Argynnini with their dusky clothing retiring to the surface of the ground where they are least liable to be seen, the satyrids remaining DECEPTIVE DEVICES 39 perhaps upon the stems or blades of grass or sedge which form their food and among which they are concealed by their striped attire. Or the retire- ment may be to the under surface of a leaf, a very common practice, which is exemplified in our own fauna by the habit, among others, of such diverse butterflies as our Green Comma (Polygonia faunus), Buckeye (Junonia coenia), and the Blue Swallow-tail (Laertias philenor). A very common mode of concealment, however, is the construction of a special nest for the pur- pose, within which they remain at all times when not feeding, and oftentimes even the greater part of their entire lives, feeding as they may do upon the nest itself until they have eaten themselves out of house and home. A good instance of this last propensity is found among the species of Vanessa, all of which construct more or less open nests, but devour the contents and the structure itself of the same. Others forming open nests are some of the species of Polygonia, while more complete web- concealments are made by the caterpillars of the American Tortoise- shell (Aglais milberti) and some of the Melitaeini. The mere partial curling of a leaf so as to conceal the sides of the creature lying thereon answers the purpose of the Tiger 40 DECEPTIVE DEVICES Swallow-tail (Jasoniades glaucus), while its neigh- bor the Green-clouded Swallow-tail (Euphoeades troilus) turns the leaf completely over so that the opposite edges touch. But the group which above all others contains caterpillars living in conceal- ment is the Hesperidae, the higher Hesperini mak- ing an oval inclosure by strong strands of silk connecting the edges of leaves at wide intervals, while the Pamphilini construct burrow-like nests by sewing together the edges of neighboring blades of grass ; hardly an instance is known where one of them lives openly. Butterfly caterpillars which live exposed have many of them special modes of guarding against danger, some falling to the ground and curling up at the slightest shock or alarm, such as many of the Melitaeini in their later stages. Others fall with greater deliberation, first attaching a thread to the leaf from which they drop, such as the Snout butterfly (Hypatus bachmanii) and the Coral Hair-streak (Strymon titus). Others as- sume a sphinx-like attitude which they may retain for a long time, as is the case with the Painted Beauty (Vanessa huntera) in its earlier life, and in this they are sometimes aided by the presence of a special knobbed process on the hunched por- AMONG CATERPILLARS 41 tions, as in the species of Basilarchia. Others when disturbed strike with their mandibles the leaf upon which they are resting, as the Red Admiral (Vanessa atalanta) and Harris’s butterfly (Cineli- dia harrisii) are known to do. Or they may move their heads from side to side, catching their man- dibles in the roughnesses of the leaf, and so pro- duce a grating sound,—a very common trick of the higher Hesperidae. A curious allied habit is found in the Blue Swallow-tail (Laertias philenor), which repeatedly taps alternately with its front legs upon the leaf when disturbed,—a habit I have seen in no other caterpillar. The Monarch (Anosia plexippus) again, which, when eating, keeps its anterior flexible filaments constantly in motion forward and backward, moves them with still greater violence when it is in a state of alarm, and this must serve as a very considerable protec- tion to it. Nearly all caterpillars, whether of butterflies or moths, will, when disturbed, throw their heads violently around from side to side in a threatening, angry manner, the head with its hard incasement and biting jaws being the most offensive weapon in the control of the caterpillar. But it is a very curious sight to see how, as impelled by one im- 42 DECEPTIVE DEVICES pulse, the young caterpillars of some of the Nym- phalidae, such as the Mourning Cloak (Euvanessa antiopa), the American Tortoise-shell (Aglais mil- berti), and Harris’s butterfiy (Cinclidia harrisii), will move their heads by simultaneous jerks to one side and the other, like a regiment of soldiers shifting arms. This community of action must be a very considerable safeguard, and indeed I am inclined to regard the mere presence of caterpillars in considerable numbers feeding in company as in itself protective, partly because it is most common in the highest family and never found in the low- est, so that the habit would seem to have grown and become intensified by its protective qualities. Some certainly of the caterpillars which thus feed in company will not be touched by chickens. I have several times thrown twigs covered with the caterpillars of the Mourning Cloak (Euvanessa an- tiopa) into a chicken yard only to the alarm of the chickens, they either paying no attention to the cat- erpillars as they crawled away, or regarding them with evident horror, never once offering to touch them; of course this may be due simply to their spinous clothing. But besides the spined cater- pillars which are presumably protected by such community of action, such as the Mourning Cloak AMONG CATERPILLARS 43 (Euvanessa antiopa), the American Tortoise-shell (Aglais milberti), the Compton Tortoise (Kugonia j--album), and the Melitaeini in their earlier stages, we have, even in our own fauna, instances of naked caterpillars which enjoy the same means of protec- tion, such as the Tawny Emperor (Chlorippe cly- ton) and the Blue Swallow-tail (Laertias phile- nor), especially in their earlier stages. The greatest danger to caterpillars would seem to be when they are in motion, as they are then more readily detected by insectivorous creatures. To guard against such danger, many caterpillars, as all the Satyrinae, are excessively slow in their movements. Most caterpillars remain absolutely still during all times when they are not actually eating or on their way to their feeding spots, but some have the habit, in passing to and from their feeding grounds, of moving with the utmost rapid- ity, hurrying as if their safety depended upon it, as doubtless it does. Such are all the Argynnini, and I have noticed a similar habit in the Gray Comma (Polygonia progne). Others, again, among the slow movers have a very peculiar trick, which I do not remember to have seen mentioned by others; it is a sort of rocking motion, not from side to side but forward and backward, moving 2a ome, - TT i4 DECEPTIVE DEVICES forward by little starts; they seem to glide by lit- tle jerks in a very slow and measured way. The caterpillars in which I have noticed this habit are the Blue-eyed Grayling (Cercyonis alope), the Orange Sulphur (Eurymus eurytheme), and the Green-clouded Swallow-tail (Euphoeades troilus) ; it is most conspicuous in the last. Perhaps of all our caterpillars there are none which have so many means of defense in habit or protective device as the species of Basilarchia, and this altogether in addition to their coloring. At- tention has already been drawn to this. It may be well, however, to summarize here some of the more peculiar ways by which it protects itself. In the first place it moves about with little starts, much as the Green-clouded Swallow-tail (Euphoeades troilus) and the others we have mentioned, its head all the while trembling as if it had the palsy ; then, when disturbed, it will throw the front half of its body about like a whip, lashing its sides with great violence and fury, an operation which must most effectually drive away many of its smaller foes at least. These points refer to its active movements, but besides we have its curious habit of living upon the extremity of the uneaten midrib of the leaf upon which it is feeding; its construc- AMONG CATERPILLARS 45 tion of a pellet of riffraff, movable with every breath of wind, apparently to distract attention from its presence; its habit of retiring after feed- ing (when a leaf no longer serves its purpose) to the twig of the plant upon which it feeds, where it is less easily observed; and its construction of a complex hibernaculum in which it passes the win- ter, to secure which from falling to the ground it securely enwraps the twig of the leaf of which it is made with silken cords to the stem. Doubtless if the behavior of our other caterpil- lars had been followed more closely, many would show devices as complicated, various, and interest- ing as those of Basilarchia. I have not attempted to go outside our own fauna, but here much more information is needed. We should not fail, how- ever, to mention the almost universal habit of cat- erpillars of eating their cast skins, so as to remove from their immediate vicinity any traces of their presence, a habit the more marked because I be- lieve it is not shared by any of those caterpillars which live in company, where the numbers are so great that escape from observation would be impos- sible, and safety lies only in their numbers. Nor have I alluded to the special protection afforded to many of the Lycaeninae by the presence of their 46 DECEPTIVE DEVICES friendly ants, nor to the osmateria or stench-throw- ers of the Papilioninae, by which they are spe- cially protected, since in both these instances these have their seat in physiological processes, which are of a widely different nature from the mere hab- its under discussion. EVE BUTTERFLIES AS BOTANISTS KNOWLEDGE of the food plants of the cater- pillars of butterflies is of prime importance to one who wishes to study their life histories; for al- though some species are polyphagous, others are the most particular creatures in the world and will starve to death if they are not. supplied with just what they want. That this is not always the easiest thing to learn may be inferred from the frequent mishaps with the most experienced. And it is no wonder they are sometimes at fault or at a loss, for the one hundred butterflies of the eastern United States and Canada, whose food plants are known, choose their food from more than one third of the families of plants mentioned in Gray’s Manual of our botany. Fifty-two families are represented; of these, thirty-two nourish only members of a single one of the four families of butterflies, and as a general rule are therefore of minor significance. Excep- 48 BUTTERFLIES tion must here be made, however, to four or five of these ; for instance, the Violaceae, which almost exclusively supply our Argynnini with food ; the Grossulaceae, on which no less than six of our Nymphalinae and especially the Vanessini have been found; the Cyperaceae, on which several, very likely many, of the Satyrids flourish; the Aquifoliaceae, on which several of our Lycaeninae, both Theclini and Lycaenini, feed; and finally the Lauraceae, a favorite food plant of the Papi- lioninae. Twelve families of plants have been found to be the food of butterflies of two (and not more than two) families of our butterflies, but in most of these cases they are only known as the food of single species in each family and so assume small importance. Yet among them are others in which the case is different. Thus the Ruta- ceae are known to serve as the food of about as many different species of Papilioninae as the Lau- raceae, and they are said also to be among the food plants of Chrysophanus ; the Betulaceae are a common food of several species of Nymphalinae and nourish also Jasoniades; while of the utmost importance are the grasses and sedges, upon which nearly all our Satyrinae and Pamphilini live, — AS BOTANISTS 49 a good fourth of our butterfly fauna, even omit- ting the many Pamphilini which doubtless feed upon grasses but which are not yet known in their early life. The families of plants fed upon by all four families of butterflies are three in number, and with the Rosaceae just mentioned and the Gra- mineae, the greatest supporter of caterpillar life, must be looked on as the favorite food of butter- flies in their early stages. These are the Cupulli- ferae and especially the oaks which nourish eight species, mostly Lycaenidae and Hesperidae; the Salicaceae, the food of eleven species, five of them Nymphalidae, the others equally divided among the remaining families; and the Leguminosae, which vie for preéminence with the Gramineae, for twenty-three of our species are found upon it ; of these, nine are Hesperidae (and perhaps exclu- sively Hesperini), seven are Lycaenidae, five Papi- lionidae (exclusively Pierinae and indeed Rhodo- cerini), and two Nymphalidae. More than one third of our butterfly fauna is made up of the lowest, least known, and most inconspicuous family, the Hesperidae, our mem- bers of one tribe of which feed almost exclusively on Leguminosae (a few on Salicaceae, Cupuli- 50 BUTTERFLIES ferae, ete.), of the other on Gramineae and Cari- ces, and of course very decidedly affect the general result when all butterflies are considered. It is entirely owing to them that these two families take the first place, though they are by no means insignificant in their relation to the other families of butterflies. For leaving the Hesperidae out of consideration, the Rosaceae easily assume the first place and hold it alone, while the Legumi- nosae and Gramineae still retain such importance as to hold the second place, and indeed the high- est position there with the Salicaceae, Compositae, and Violaceae, followed hard by the Cupuliferae, Ericaceae, Grossulaceae, and Cruciferae. These, then, are the preferred food of the caterpillars of our eastern American butterflies. Two facts brought out from this study of the food plants of our caterpillars are more striking when brought into contrast: the narrow choice of very many species which feed upon a single species or genus of plants and the very large number of families of plants which are brought under contribution to feed the entire body of our caterpillars. The fact that considerably more than half of the families of plants are sought by only a single family of butterflies, and indeed AS BOTANISTS ol usually by but a single species of butterfly, is only what one who has reared butterflies might expect, since he must often have found that under no consideration would a given caterpillar feed upon anything whatever but its own pet food plant. This is more striking because of the polyphagous nature of others, such as Jasoniades glaucus, which feeds upon plants belonging to no less than fifteen different families. In many, perhaps the majority of instances the plants upon which allied species or genera of caterpillars feed, themselves belong to allied fami- lies of the botanical systems; and Fritz Muller brings forward some curious instances in which a knowledge of the habits of butterflies would have led, had they been followed, to an earlier recognition of the affinities of certain plants. Thus he says (Nature, xxx. 240) : — “The caterpillars of Mechanitis, Dircenna, Ceratinia, and Ithomia feed on different species of Solanaceae (Solanum, Cyphomandra, Bassovia, Cestrum), those of the allied genus Thyridia on Brunfelsia. Now this latter genus of plants had been placed unanimously among the Scrophularineae, till quite recently it was transferred by Bentham and Hooker to the Solanaceae. Thus it appears that butterflies had recognized the true affinity of Brunfelsia long before botanists did so. 59 BUTTERFLIES “ There is yet another and more curious instance of our butterflies confirming the arrangement of plants in Bentham and Hooker’s ‘Genera Plantarum.’ Ageronia and Didonis were formerly widely separated by lepi- dopterists, being even considered as constituting dis- tinct families, but now they are to be found beside one another among the Nymphalinae, and the structure of their caterpillars leaves no doubt about their close affin- ity. The caterpillars of Ageronia feed on Dalecham- pia, those of Didonis on Tragia. Now these two Euphorbiaceous genera were widely separated by Endlicher, who placed the former among the Euphor- bieae, the latter among the Acalypheae ; Bentham and Hooker, on the contrary, place them close together in the same sub-tribe of Plukenetieae, and thus their close affinity which had been duly appreciated by butterflies has finally been recognized by botanists also.” The narrow choice of certain species is perhaps indicated in our own fauna by what we know of the food plant of the Pearl Crescent (Phyciodes tharos). So far as we know it feeds only upon a single species of Aster; “and if your butterfly selects only that,’ said the late Dr. Gray when I told him of this, “it is a better botanist than most of us.” Only one other plant has been alleged as its food and that probably by mistake. This special Aster the female selected out of many AS BOTANISTS 53 furnished it by Mr. Mead whereon to lay her egos, and no one has yet reared it upon anything but Aster novae-angliae. Considering the diffi- culty that botanists have with the species of this group, such restriction of choice, if really true, certainly indicates some keen perception on the part of the butterfly. Now with exceedingly rare exceptions the eggs of butterflies are laid upon the very plant upon which the caterpillar will feed. In certain in- stances where the plants are abundant, as in the case of grasses, the butterfly may lay upon an object in the near vicinity, and this has also happened in a few instances in the case of butter- flies which are rather particular in their choice. Thus I once saw a European Satyrid lay an egg on a dead blade of grass lying loose upon the ground, have seen one of our species of Brenthis lay eggs upon grass in the vicinity of violets, and found the egg of a Pamphilid upon a thistle grow- ing among grasses. These exceptions seem only to prove the general rule that the eggs of butter- flies are laid directly upon the food plant of the young. This is an act of instinct, one will say. But is this any real explanation? We wish to know how 54 BUTTERFLIES the instinct acts. A parent butterfly that in its early life has been nourished upon willow has no means in the winged condition of tasting the wil- low to recognize it, its organs for obtaining food being suited only for liquid nourishment. Nor can it be by the color of the object. It is true that butterflies are attracted by flowers through their means of vision. Interesting stories are told of their being deceived by painted or arti- ficial flowers. But in these cases there is no rea- son to suppose that it is anything but the tint in mass that attracts them to the spot. Pray how does the green of one plant differ from that of all others? Anatomy and experiment both seem to teach that butterflies have no power of vision for any such discrimination as is required of them in selecting special food plants for their young; which yet they discover in an unerring manner. There remains apparently nothing but smell. That their sense of smell is exceptionally acute is plain from facts coming from a quite different source, which are given in another place, under Aromatic Butterflies. The production of odor implies the recognition of odor, and inasmuch as the organs through which the odor is known in many cases to be emitted exist in a very much AS BOTANISTS 55 larger number of butterflies than have been recog- nized by our senses as odorous, it would seem a warrantable conclusion that, although we cannot perceive their odor, they nevertheless produce odors recognizable by their mates. Now we know in a similar way that many plants are odorous quite apart from their flowers; and if one, with this idea in mind, will but watch the movements of a mother butterfly seeking a spot whereon to lay her eggs, he will not fail to recognize that many of these actions seem particularly in keeping with the notion that she is at work scenting the various plants that bear a general resemblance in their aspect to the one which she seeks; many, indeed, which have no such general appearance, settling or half settling in a dozen different places in the near vicinity of the plant, reaching it by nearer and nearer approaches, and finally settling with satis- faction at the desired spot. ‘To such an observer it will seem tolerably clear that it is to the sense of smell that butterflies owe their recognition of botanical species. Vi. THE NAMES OF BUTTERFLIES WHEN in the preparation of my “ Butterflies of the Eastern United States and Canada” I found myself compelled by my study of the fauna to make use of a scientific terminology very different from that then in ordinary use, it seemed as if it might be desirable that at least our commoner species should have English names, which might in time become settled and then endure through all possible variations of scientific terminology. I noticed that in all the popular British works upon butterflies, an English name was almost invariably given, and that the names adopted by different authors did not always agree. It appeared, there- fore, to be probable that many of them were man- ufactured for the occasion. Some were extremely pretty, others appeared forced. I had noticed, further, that for the similar convenience of agricul- turists an English name, often bungling and diffi- cult to remember, a translation perhaps of an awk- : : 4 NAMES OF BUTTERFLIES 57 ward scientific name, was given to insects treated of in economical reports; and, further, that Gosse, an Englishman who came to this country in his youth and wrote very interestingly of our animals, almost invariably applied a name, apparently of his own coining, to the butterflies with which he here came in contact. I therefore made an at- tempt to introduce such names into our nomen- clature, where they had not already been given, en- deavoring to adopt from the English such generic terms as fritillary, hair-streak, etc., for similar but- terflies of our own country, and to coin appropri- ate names where required. I published a list of this sort in the first volume of “ Psyche,” which strangely enough met with most violent opposi- tion, an opposition which appeared to me to be entirely unreasonable and certainly out of all pro- portion to the adjudged crime. Accordingly in my “ Butterflies of the Eastern United States” I again attempted to collate all the names that I could find that had been given to our different butterflies, and to select from among them that one which seemed most worthy of perma- nence, as my contribution toward a popular termi- nology. Of course in this case precedence is of no consequence, and local names applicable to another 58 THE NAMES continent can scarcely be used. But I have not hesitated to devise names for such as have not already received them, in the hope that they may sometime be favorably received. Exception was made to my first list on the ground that such names should have a real popular value and ori- gin; and this objection is unquestionably valid. But that attempt and the later one are only efforts at the introduction of names which may hereafter become as strictly popular, in a technical sense, as those which have been given to certain common butterflies in other parts of the world. They must once have been named by some one, and the practice is common among ornithologists; only recently Mr. Sclater was complimented in the columns of “ Nature” for his success and good judgment in this matter. I have further support in the fact that one finds among the early authors on the continent of Europe many attempts of this same kind, where common names have been ap- plied which may or may not have come down to us at the present time. Thus taking up the other day the old work of Sepp on Dutch butterflies, I found such names as “ konings-mantel”’ (a curious vari- ation from the German trauermantel) given to antiopa, ‘distelvink” to cardui, ‘“‘ nommer-vlin- OF BUTTERFLIES 59 der” to atalanta, and to others not found in this country such odd names as “de eike page” and “hooi-beestje.” I should be sorry if old Sepp had not taken this liberty. This is my warrant and my only warrant for attempting to introduce such names. It seems to me that they will possibly serve a useful purpose, and certainly they can do no one any harm. ‘They can be simply ignored. They will only survive if fitted to do so. One examining for the first time the scientific terminology of butterflies would be interested at seeing how largely the names, and especially the early ones, had been bestowed by authors who had received a classical education, and how extensively the Greek mythology figured in the nomenclature of these creatures. The many forms of the name of Venus in particular would strike one. Much of this is certainly due to the example set by the first great nomenclator of zodlogy, Linné, who applied also the names of Greek heroes in the Trojan war to a very large number of swallow-tail butterflies, and his example has been followed by lepidopterol- ogists down to the present day. A few notable exceptions will be found in later times when names of old Scandinavian mythical heroes were intro- duced into the nomenclature of European butter- 60 THE NAMES flies; and in our own country Harris, when he found so large a number of skippers unnamed, bethought himself of a new device, which was the use of the names of Indian chiefs of greater or less historic fame which have come down to us, and his example, first followed by Edwards and myself, has been taken up by nearly all subsequent writ- ers, so that the bulk of the specific names of our Pamphilini are now drawn from those of the dusky red aborigines of our country. As to the very word “butterfly” itself, there has been much written, but, strangely, as it seems to me, the persons best qualified by their philologi- cal learning are least assured concerning the deri- vation of the name. Skeat and Murray are not known as entomologists. ‘It has amused many to devise guesses to explain the name,” says Skeat. Mr. Frederick Clarkson, in the “ Canadian Ento- mologist”” (xvi. 44), thinks there is good reason to believe that the root-meaning of the word “ dates back to early Egyptian history, and as a hierogly- phic it is synonymous as representing the qualities of completeness and perfection which characterize the soul.” All of which I in my ignorance judge to be humbug. One distrusts much of the reason- ing drawn from hieroglyphs, for it would seem in OF BUTTERFLIES 61 general that almost any meaning can be drawn from them by dilettanteism if only sufficient ingenuity is putin. An English writer, Sara Coleridge, has strenuously upheld the idea that a butterfly was simply a better sort of fly, laughing to scorn the common notion, which seems to me, as I think it must to all entomologists, to be unquestionably the correct one, that the word is simply an expressive name given to the commonest form of butterfly that is found in Europe, where the name arose, namely, the butterflies of the genus Eurymus, which are ordinarily of much the same kind of yel- low that one finds on the buttercup, whence the name of both. One feels the greater confidence in this because the term is applied in so many dif- ferent languages in much the same way. In Anglo- Saxon, it is buttor-fleoge, which is simply butterfly ; while some of the variations of this term in other languages are the Dutch botervlieg, earlier boter- vlieghe, the German butterfliege, and the earlier German form, buttervogel.! Other variations of the same name appear in the poetical quotations 1 Compare our own ladybird for Coccinella, as in the com- - mon distich, which ran differently in my childhood from what is set down in the books. I was taught to say :— ‘* Ladybird, ladybird, fly away home, Your house is on fire and your children will roam.” 62 NAMES OF BUTTERFLIES from different languages which I made use of in my “Butterflies of the Eastern United States.” Murray in his New English dictionary gives vari- ous extracts showing the early use of this name, the earliest in the Anglo-Saxon being as far back as 1000 by Aelfric. Chaucer gives it in another form : “Swich talkyng is nat worth a boterflye.” VI. COLOR-RELATIONS OF CHRYSALIDS TO THEIR SURROUNDINGS Ir has long been known that there is in many instances considerable variation in the color of the chrysalids of certain butterflies, and that in not a few instances we find a dimorphism more or less accentuated. ‘The most frequent difference that has been noticed has been the prevalence on the one hand of green tints, on the other of dark gray or brown. Now when we recall that the common- est places chosen by caterpillars of butterflies for pupation are either amongst the foliage of the plant on which they have fed, or on the other hand pendent from, or attached to, the twigs or trunks of trees with their gray bark, or to stones whose general color is dark gray or brown, we notice that we have here general tints of much the same con- trast. When we further observe that the green color prevails in the chrysalids of those species which commonly transform upon the leaves of their 64 COLOR-RELATIONS OF CHRYSALIDS food plant, and brown or gray in those which seem to prefer the background of bark or rock or dead wood, we are struck at once with the protection. which such resemblance must afford to chrysalids in general. And this conclusion would be very much strengthened were we to review the various minuter peculiarities of coloring and of sculpture which one may easily find. One of the most curious of these is noted by Fritz Muller, who says that the appendages on the chrysalids of Eueides, which hang horizontally on the under side of leaves, resemble the fungi which attack insects and which are found in precisely similar places. Another instance would be found in the sharp angularities of many chrysalids among the Nymphalidae, com- bined with their frequent brilliancy by reflected colors, golden or nacreous, which, in combination, would be strikingly similar to the metallic gleam of angular minerals in the rocks which form their natural background. This last circumstance, to which attention has been specially called by a very painstaking experi- mental entomologist of England, Professor E. B. Poulton, led him to a careful inquiry into the cause and extent of the special color-relations exist- ing between the chrysalids of butterflies and their TO THEIR SURROUNDINGS 65 surrounding surfaces. He has been able to obtain almost at will chrysalids of different colors, accord- ing to the tints with which he has surrounded them, and so has opened a new field of experimental inquiry which may yield important, as it already has interesting results. By carefully selecting the time at which his experiments were made he has been able to determine that in all the species experimented upon it was only necessary to con- fine attention to that period in the later larval life of the insect, when it has ceased feeding and remains motionless, together with the early portion of the next period, after spinning the silken pads and shrouds for the pupal attachments until it has thrown off the larval skin. It had already been pointed out by Meldola that it was impossible to suppose the moist skin of the freshly formed pupa photographically sensitive to the color of the sur- rounding surfaces, and this has been made per- fectly evident from the experiments of Poulton, which show that the color is determined before the assumption of the pupal state, since experiments made later than the time mentioned produced absolutely no results. Neither was Poulton suc- cessful, as he seems to have expected to be, in preventing the influence of surrounding objects 66 COLOR-RELATIONS OF CHRYSALIDS from reaching the nervous centres through the ocalli of the caterpillar. All his successful experi- ments came when applied to that period of the transformation to which we have referred. Most of the experiments were made upon three species, the Small Tortoise-shell (Aglais urticae), the Large Cabbage White (Mancipium brassicae), and the Small Cabbage White (Pieris rapae). The experiments consisted in preparing for the creatures during their changes artificial surround- ings of different colors: green, orange, black, white, and gilt.- Over seven hundred chrysalids in all were experimented upon, and it was found that with Aglais urticae green and orange surroundings caused no effect on the pupal colors, black produced as a rule dark chrysalids, while white produced light colored ones, many of the last being bril- hiantly golden; this suggested the use of gilt sur- roundings, which were far more efficient than white in producing chrysalids of a distinctly golden color, more so even than often occurs in a state of nature. The influence of black was curiously shown by the fact that when the caterpillars changed to chrysalids upon light surfaces, those which under- went their transformations in close proximity to one another were darker than those which were more TO THEIR SURROUNDINGS 67 isolated, the color of each being affected by that part of the surroundings which were made up of the dark bodies of its neighbors. In endeavor- ing to discover whether the sensitiveness of the chrysalids to their surroundings was due to the general surface of the skin as a whole or only to that of one portion, experiments were made by confining the chrysalidsin tubes, part of which were colored black and part gilt, and the two parts separated by a diaphragm only permitting the pendent body to pass through; by reversing the conditions and making experiments with a large number of chrysalids, it became plainly evident that the color influence acted on some element of the larval skin, and that the larger the area of the skin exposed to any one color the more the chrysa- lids followed its influence. The nature of the effects produced is thus described by Poulton : — “The coloring matter of the dark pupae is contained in a thin superficial layer of the cuticle; below this isa thicker layer divided into exceedingly delicate lamellae, between which fluids are present, and the latter form the thin plates which, by causing interference of light, produce the brilliant metallic appearance. The thinner upper layer, being dark, acts as a screen in the dark pupae. Precisely the same metallic appearances are 68 COLOR-RELATIONS OF CHRYSALIDS caused by the films of air between the thin plates of glass which are formed on the surface of bottles long exposed to earth and moisture. Both have the same spectroscopic characters and the same transmitted colors (complementary to those seen by reflection). The brilliancy of the cuticle can be preserved in spirit for any length of time; it disappears on drying, but can be renewed on wetting (this had been previously known), and the colors are seen to change during the process of drying and when the cuticle is pressed, for the films are thus made thinner. The same lamellated layer exists in non-metallic pupae of other species, and is used as a reflector for transparent coloring-matter contained in its outer lamellae. Thus the structure which ren- dered possible the brilliant effects due to interference probably existed long before these special effects were obtained, and was used for a different purpose.” It has long been known that many of the chrys- alids of the Vanessini which yield parasitic Ichneu- monidae in place of their proper inhabitants are frequently gilded; which is to be explained, in Poulton’s view, by the abnormal state of the cater- pillar, which prevents the formation of pigment in the chrysalis. In this instance the gilded appear- ance is preservative not of the creature itself, but of one of its foes, and does not appear a very wise provision of Nature. TO THEIR SURROUNDINGS 69 These experiments were made principally with the Small Tortoise-shell (Aglais urticae); others upon the different species of Piermae were quite similar, the influence of black surroundings being to produce dark chrysalids, and the greater the il- lumination the darker the chrysalids, this last re- sult being the reverse of that obtained with the Vanessini; white produced light colored chrysalids, and the greater the illumination the lighter the chrysalids; dark red produced dark, deep orange very light green chrysalids; pale yellow and yel- lowish green surroundings produced rather darker chrysalids than the orange; and bluish green much darker, while dark blue produced still darker ehrysalids. There is thus seen to be a certain difference be- tween different sorts of chrysalids as to the effect of the color of their surroundings, some being de- eidedly affected by colors which have no influence upon others. Probably a careful study of the nat- ural conditions under which pupation takes place may lead to better comprehension of a fact at pres- ent not clearly explainable; and may bring other instances into harmony, as where, according to Fritz Miller, a Brazilian Swallow-tail, evander, is said to have both brown and green chrysalids with no intermediate forms, and both produced under 70 COLOR-RELATIONS OF CHRYSALIDS identical circumstances. Our own Zebra Swallow- tail (Iphiclides ajax), in which a similar dimor- phism seems to be equally distinct, would serve as a good subject for experiment. In concluding his account of his experiments on the Pierinae, Mr. Poulton observes : — ‘Tt must be remarked that the effect of the colored surroundings upon the dark pigment is, perhaps, the least important part of the changes produced, for there are other consequences which seem to be much deeper in significance and far more difficult to understand. The black pigment patches and minute black dots are cuticular and superficial, while the ground colors are subcuticular and deep-seated ; and in the most brightly colored pupae they are mixed colors due to the existence of different pigmentary (and probably chlorophylloid) bodies present in the different elements and at different depths of the subcuticular tissues of the same pupa. In other pupae no trace of such colors can be seen. Hence we see in these most complex and varied effects of the stimulus provided by the reflected light, which deepen into their permanent pupal condition very many hours after the stimulus has ceased to act, the strongest evi- dence for the existence of a chain of physiological pro- cesses almost unparalleled in intricacy and difficulty, while a theory of comparatively simple and direct photo- chemical changes induced by the stimulus itself without the intervention of such a physiological circle seems entirely inadequate as an explanation of the facts.” VIL. THE WHITE MOUNTAINS OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, AS A HOME FOR BUTTERFLIES THERE is no spot in New England where an aurelian can obtain such successful results in a brief time as in the high valleys of the White Mountain region. Not only are many butterflies which elsewhere are rare, or abundant only in very restricted localities, to be obtained here, but they occur in the greatest profusion, more than making amends for the less favorable weather which is apt to interfere with collecting in mountainous locali- ties. From the latter part of May until late in September one is always rewarded for a few days’ collecting. Perhaps it is because my visits have mainly been to that spot that I have found “The Glen” the most favorable region. Here, in a valley running north and south, at an elevation of about 2000 feet, following in one direction the valley of the Peabody, and in the other that of the Ellis, in a TP THE WHITE MOUNTAINS densely wooded region with high mountains on either side sloping down to the narrow valley, with considerable clearings in the river bottom, where cultivated patches, pastures, swampy tracts, hill- sides overgrown with shrubbery, and damp and shaded forest roads are to be met with, nearly all the conditions for abundant insect-life are to be found at their best. More than this, a wagon road, eight miles in length, winding half way through the primeval forest, where it forms a broad lane which the butterflies covet, half way over the rough ledges and sedgy plateaus of the treeless upper region of our highest mountain, where flowers are blooming all through the season to captivate the tired traveler,—this road to the highest summit affords a ready means of learning at what altitude the valley species ascend, and what kinds inhabit the inhospitable higher levels of the mountains. Let us speak first of those which belong in the valleys, where the vegetation 1s so profuse and di- versified ; and restrict our remarks principally to those which are commonest here, and met with more rarely elsewhere, — those which have, so far as New England is concerned, their maximum development in this district. AS A HOME FOR BUTTERFLIES 13 It is the region par excellence of that striking butterfly, the Banded Purple (Basilarchia arthe- mis). When the stage, with its city freight, wind- ing its way over the hilly roads with the first rush of travel, leaves most of the farms behind it and enters the heart of the forest, flock after flock of these showy butterflies arise from the damp spots in the road where, sometimes by hundreds, they are assembled to suck the moisture from the earth, and then flutter about the stage in fascinating bewilderment, settling again to the feast in a hes- itating way as soon as the disturbance is past. Indeed, they sometimes become a very nuisance, dozens of them when seeking a shelter entering the open doors and windows of the farm-houses, and fluttermg about the windows in a vain and distracting attempt to escape when there is any movement within. In the early season, when the buds are just be- ginning to burst, the young caterpillar may be found emerging from its hibernaculum deftly fas- tened near the tips of black-birch sprigs everywhere growing by the roadside; in July, the bristling globular egg attached to the extreme tip of the pointed leaf of the same, and later the leaves eaten in peculiar fashion, reveal where to look for the 74 THE WHITE MOUNTAINS grotesque party-colored caterpillar, scarcely to be distinguished from that of its congener, the Vice- roy (B. archippus). The latter is also common (though less common than in southern New Eng- land), prefers the willow and the poplar, and may be found feeding even up to the extreme limit of forest vegetation on the mountain side. This, too, is the New England metropolis for that high-spirited butterfly, the Green Comma (Polygonia faunus). Unlike arthemis, it is never found in flocks, but only by threes and fours at most, keeping up a constant warfare with one another ; but it is still so common along the roads, and particularly in the more open spots, or where the roads enter bits of forest or cross a mountain brook, that, notwithstanding its wary activity, one may even capture in favorable times a hundred in a day; once I must have seen five hundred ina single railway ride of six miles in the forest on the western side of Mt. Washington between Fabyan’s and the base of the mountain. Its caterpillar — also party-colored, but bristling with spines — may be found both on the black birches and the wil- lows. Where both these plants are found in such abundance, search would seem to be vain; but if it is confined to such sprays of the smaller plants as AS A HOME FOR BUTTERFLIES 75 project forward toward the road, — such spots in- deed as the butterflies select to alight upon, — the patient search will be rewarded. Another Polygo- nia, far rarer, the Hoary Comma (P. gracilis), I had until 1887 taken only here and on the oppo- site side of Mt. Washington, perhaps a couple of dozen in all in as many years; and it is almost its only known locality in New England, though it doubtless occurs in many other elevated regions favorable for P. faunus. In 1887 it was tolera- bly common, and was found to occupy a distinctly lower zone, below 2500 feet. The Gray Comma (P. progne) is also common, belongs properly to the same zone, and I have taken its larva here on the wild gooseberry. The Compton Tortoise (Eugonia j.-album) is another butterfly common in certain seasons at least, and I should consider this its favorite New England ground, were it not that one night it flew by hundreds into Sankaty lighthouse on Nantucket, where in several sum- mers’ residence on the island I never saw it at any other time. The Mourning Cloak (Kuvanessa antiopa) is also common enough at the White Mountains, but not much more so than elsewhere. One may generally see a dozen on a good day in early June, — seedy-looking individuals which 76 THE WHITE MOUNTAINS have survived the winter. The American Tor- toise-shell (Aglais milberti) is also common in the lower country, feeding in swarms upon the net- tles; and this concludes the series of Nymphalini which need be mentioned. The Mountain Silver-spot (Argynnis atlantis) occurs here in the utmost profusion, as nowhere else in New England. One may easily take hun- dreds in a single day, the sandalwood-scented males largely predominating. The Silver-bordered Fri- tillary (Brenthis myrina) and the Meadow Fritil- lary (B. bellona) are abundant in the restricted meadow-lands, and in about equal numbers, though B. myrina is far more common in central New Eng- land. But the region is one of the best for most of our Melitaeini. The Tawny Crescent (Phyci- odes batesii) occurs here early in June, and this is its only known New England locality. The Pearl Crescent (P. tharos) swarms (as it also does else- where), and here is the best place to search for those very local species, Harris’s butterfly (Cincli- dia harrisii) and the Baltimore (Euphydryas phae- ton). They can best be obtained in the larval state, for they may always be taken in large num- bers very early in the spring in such conveniently accessible spots as the immediate borders of the AS A HOME FOR BUTTERFLIES (7 Glen road, harrisii feeding in large companies on Diplopappus and phaeton scarcely more dispersed on Lonicera. I have never paid special attention to the The- clini in this region, nor had them force themselves on my notice; so that I am inclined to think none of them particularly abundant, or more so than elsewhere. Nor are any of the Lycaenini excep- tionally common, excepting Cyaniris, which is cer- tainly far commoner, especially the Early Spring Azure (C. pseudargiolus lucia), than anywhere else in New England, abundant as it often is. The roads seem at times blue with them, and they swarm at all moist spots, occurring also to the very edge of the forest line, and enchanting the early pedestrian at every step. They are also one of the earliest risers, and are the first to be seen when the clouds break after a rain. Of the Chrysoph- anini, the American Copper (Heodes hypophlaeas ) is of course abundant, as everywhere, and the Wanderer (Feniseca tarquinius) may always be found in its time at the proper places; there is one isolated copse, with alder (everywhere growing in profusion ), just north of the Glen House, where I never fail to see it fluttermg about when in season. | | | | 78 THE WHITE MOUNTAINS Among the Pierinae, the Clouded Sulphur (Kury- mus philodice) and the Cabbage butterfly (Pieris rapae) are of course abundant enough. I shall be surprised if the Pink Edge (EK. interior) does not some day turn up here, having escaped the net only because no one takes so common an insect as its congener, which it resembles too much on the wing to be readily distinguished from it; and I have taken it above timber. The only interesting form of this group found here is the Gray-veined White (Pieris oleracea). ‘Though nowhere nearly so com- mon as thirty years ago, when I first collected at the mountains, when one might see fifty at a time in an open field, it is not yet quite exterminated by the invading Cabbage butterfly (P. rapae), and in the very first of the season, when a dozen or so may be taken in a day, is as common as that species ; but with the advanced season it appears quite lost among the swarms of the latter. Probably it will always hold out in this, its New England strong- hold. None of the swallow-tails are preéminently abundant, with the single exception of the Tiger Swallow-tail (Jasoniades glaucus). But this is indeed an exception. Early in June of any year one may take a dozen or twenty with a single sweep -_— AS A HOME FOR BUTTERFLIES 19 of the net at moist places by the roadside, or if cautious enough pick up with the fingers one speci- men after another till he wearies of the task. It never fails to be abundant, and its great size and social habits make it appear the commonest butter- fly of the region. The males appear to vastly out- number the females. The skippers may be dismissed with a few words, as most of them may be found equally abundant elsewhere ; but this is certainly the best place I know for obtaining the Dreamy Dusky-wing (Tha- naos icelus), and is probably the best for securing those rarer forms, the Arctic Skipper (Pamphila mandan) and Pepper and Salt (Amblyscirtes samoset), though they are never very abundant, while the Roadside Skipper (A. vialis) is always to be met with early in June. These are the more interesting of the valley butterflies of the White Mountains, found in much greater abundance than elsewhere ; but they form a small part of those which abound here, and the real interest centres in noting to what height any of them may be found. For this the open heads of the great ravines which seem to gnaw at the very vitals of the great mountain masses, with the wagon road up Mt. Washington on one side and the 80 THE WHITE MOUNTAINS broad railway-cutting at the other, forming as they do highways for butterfly as well as man, are the most interesting and instructive spots. Prominent among those which may be found, and which prob- ably or certainly pass their lives in any part of the forest region, however elevated, where there are open spaces, are the Viceroy (Basilarchia ar- chippus), already mentioned in this way, the Poly- gonias, the Compton Tortoise (Eugonia j.-album), and the Spring Azure (Cyaniris pseudargiolus). Not infrequently, these fly even far above these natural limits, and have been taken or seen upon the highest points. Indeed, many insects are the veriest Appalachians, seeming to take a delight in exploring the summits. This is truer of some other insects than of butterflies, and perhaps they are borne upward by the wind-currents; for in the first week of June I have found the great snow-patches at the very summit of Mt. Washing- ton fairly peppered with numerous small insects, especially Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Homoptera, prominent among which were thou- sands upon thousands of delicate-winged plant-lice. Besides these among the larger insects an Acan- thosoma, perhaps A. nebulosa, swarmed on the hotel piazza, and every pool of water by the roadside was WHITE MOUNTAIN BUTTERFLIES AS A HOME FOR BUTTERFLIES 81 the grave of countless Bibio femoratus. Of the butterflies alone which I have found upon the very highest summits are (besides two species immedi- ately to be mentioned, characteristic of the mountain top) the following: Basilarchia archippus, B. arthe- mis, Polygonia interrogationis, P. faunus, P. gra- eilis, Eugonia j.-album, Euvanessa antiopa, Aglais milberti, Argynnis atlantis, Brenthis myrina, B. bel- lona, Phyciodes tharos, Incisalia niphon, Cyaniris pseudargiolus, Pieris rapae, Jasoniades glaucus, Thanaos icelus, and Limochores taumas, —in all, twenty species. It will require still a good deal of field-work to determine how far up the mountain side these forms habitually breed; for, as given, the list is merely that of stragglers of an inquisitive turn of mind. It is far more interesting, perhaps the most in- teresting point in the geographical distribution of New England butterflies, to find that there are two butterflies living exclusively on these inclement mountain heights. One of them, the White Moun- tain butterfly (Oeneis semidea), is known else- where only on the summits of the highest peaks of the Rocky Mountains in Colorado, where it does not appear, apparently, below an elevation of about ry 4 uy / it u | 82 THE WHITE MOUNTAINS 12,000 feet, above which, and up to 14,000 feet, it has been taken on Mt. Lincoln, Sierra Blanea, the Argentine Pass, Pike’s Peak, and Twin Lakes. It is, however, regarded by some as only a variety of a species found farther north. In any case it is either a distinct species or well on the road to it; and so far as its interest in this connection goes, it matters little in which light it be viewed. The other species, the Dappled Fritillary (Brenthis montinus), will, in my judgment, certainly be found beyond the great range of the White Mountains, whence only it is so far known. I should look for it confidently above the forest line in the Adiron- dacks, and on Ktaadn, as well as other elevated and barren heights. It has been reported as seen on Black Mountain near Thornton, N. H., which is wooded to the summit; but an actual capture would be necessary to establish such a fact. It, too, is regarded by some as merely a variety of an- other species found farther north, and this northern species occurs as near as southern Labrador and Anticosti, and ranges across the country to Great Slave Lake. It is, however, separable from it, and whether to be looked on as a distinct species or merely as a variety is a pure matter of individual idiosynerasy. The question is similar to the pre- AS A HOME FOR BUTTERFLIES 83 ceding, but at present receives no side-light from the west. One will hardly fail to notice that while the forest line at the White Mountains is tolerably well marked (at a height of about 4000 or 4500 feet), it is always succeeded above by a consider- able area, where the dwarfed spruce or “ scrub, ”’ strugelmg upward with ever diminishing height, conceals the gray rocks in a covering of uniform green, excepting on the unstable surfaces of the steeper slopes, — an area which is strongly contrasted with the barren gray broken rocks above, which lie piled in vast heaps exposed to full view, except where a patch of sedge furnishes a small and _bar- ren pasture upon some more favored plateau. The sides of these mountains, where they rise to their highest culmination, are thus divisible into a forest and an alpine region, and the latter into a lower, or serub, and an upper, or rocky, district. These two subdivisions of the alpine region correspond fairly well with the areas occupied by the two mountain butterflies just mentioned. There is no doubt that occasional individuals of the White Mountain but- terfly (Oeneis semidea) will be found far within the limits of the lower alpine region ; for the fierce blasts of wind which sweep around these lofty ele- 84 THE WHITE MOUNTAINS vations must sometimes hurl these feeble flutterers far down toward the wooded valleys, as I have myself seen ; and there is no doubt that they can find their food plant all through the lower alpine region ; nevertheless, the contrast between the occa- sional and unwilling visitor below and the swarms which in their season crowd the upper plateaus is very marked and significant. The localities where I have found them most abundant are the succes- sive sedgy plateaus which flank the upper part of the carriage road on Mt. Washington, and espe- cially the broad area between the sixth and seventh mile-posts, where the road takes a side turn, and which I call Semidea Plateau. So, too, one may find an aspiring Brenthis above the limits of the lower alpine region ; but it is very rarely seen there, and the violets on which the caterpillar probably feeds will scarcely ever be found in any abundance within the upper alpine area. It seems fairly deducible from these facts that even the limited area of the barren heights above the White Mountain forests is divisible into two districts, each of which claims a butterfly as its own; so that in ascending Mt. Washington, we pass, as it were, from New Hampshire to northern Labrador ; for on leaving the New Hampshire forests and forest fauna behind AS A HOME FOR BUTTERFLIES 85 us, we come first upon insects (there are others be- sides B. montinus) recalling those of the northern shores of the Gulf of St. Lawrence and the coast of Labrador opposite Newfoundland; and when we have attained the summit a butterfly greets us which represents the fauna of Atlantic Labrador and Greenland. Interesting as this is, how very meagre such a showing appears by the side of our knowledge of the butterfly faunas of the Swiss and Colorado alps, where the mountains rise to so much greater heights, and the mountainous area is so vastly more extended! In the Swiss mountains, where the alpine area is limited above as well as below, and the melting of the eternal snows keeps the whole region above the trees one of the choicest pasturages for cattle that the earth affords, the whole aspect of the butterfly world is different. A host of species in infinite numbers crowd about the blossoms, the springs, the very edges of the glaciers. Forms wholly unknown in the valleys below, or allied to but easily distinguished from them, meet one at every step. A species of Oeneis, very many of Erebia, several Brenthis, a number of Melitaeini, a host of Lycaenini, with species of Eurymus, Parnassius, and several Hes- 86 THE WHITE MOUNTAINS peridae, show how varied and striking the fauna is. Besides these a great many of the valley forms often accompany them, among which will be found our old friends antiopa, cardui and ata- lanta, so rarely seen with us above the forest. In the cordilleras of Colorado, where the snow-fields are far less important, and glaciers are practically unknown, we have a condition of things between the mountains of Switzerland and New Hamp- shire. The number of distinct forms is consider- able, but by no means so large as in Switzerland. A couple of species of Oeneis are found here, with several Erebias, and a Brenthis or two; some Melitaeini also occur, most of which are also found some distance below the timber-line, which is here vastly higher than at the White Moun- tains, being at about 10,000 feet. The Lycaenini are abundant, and one finds a characteristic Eury- mus, Parnassius (also found at lower levels), and one or two Hesperidae of the same group as occurs on the Swiss Alps. Indeed, the agreement of the typical alpine forms of Colorado and Switzerland is striking, and in strange contrast to the poverty of New Hampshire; the more so, as a large number of the additional generic types are not those characteristic of high latitudes. AS A HOME FOR BUTTERFLIES 87 What the higher levels of the White Mountains would be as a home for butterflies, if a thousand or two more feet were added to their elevation and snow crowned the higher summits, it might be hard to say, but it would certainly be still very different from the fauna of the Swiss or the Col- orado alps. Many of the generic forms which are common to them scarcely occur in eastern America; so that the difference between the three alpine faunas we have mentioned accentuates the distinction which exists between eastern America and Europe, and the agreement found between western America and Europe. VEEL. BUTTERFLY SOUNDS Ir has long been known that some South American butterflies during their flight give utterance to peculiar clicking sounds, but it is far less known that such noises are made by our own butterflies; we shall hope to show that it is not improbably a common feature in the life of butterflies. The first account of the noises made by butterflies (belonging to the genus Ageronia) appears to be that given by Darwin in his cele- brated “ Journal,” who states that “several times when a pair, probably male and female, were chasing each other in an irregular course, they passed within a few yards of me; and I distinctly heard a clicking noise, similar to that produced by a toothed wheel passing under a spring catch. The noise was continued at short intervals, and could be distinguished at about twenty yards’ distance.” But the most interesting account we have seen of these sounds is that given by Mr. BUTTERFLY SOUNDS 89 Bigg-Wither. This butterfly, which he and his friends christened the “ whip butterfly,” is said by him to settle upon the boles of trees, head downward and wings outspread, closely embracing the bark. “In this position, which is more com- mon to moths than to butterflies, it remains unde- tected by the casual observer, as it resembles merely a patch of lichen. If approached, how- ever, it will give warning of its disapprobation by sharply shutting and opening its wings once or twice (more generally twice) in quick succession, producing by this sudden contact the whip-like snap from which we gave it its name.” One notices exactly this movement in many of our temperate Vanessini, when half alarmed. “ Fre- quently, too, it makes the same sound when on the wing. The surugud [a bird with a sharp beak and abnormally big mouth] is very partial to this butterfly, and is at once attracted by the whip-like crack, forsaking its branch on which perhaps it has been perching for half an hour without having given the smallest sign of life, and darting after the ‘whip-cracker’ with great eagerness.” Mr. Walker states that when these butterflies are approached after alighting they start off at great speed, ‘““making at the same 90 BUTTERFLY SOUNDS time a loud and most singular snapping or crack- ling noise, which I can best compare to the sound of a slight electric spark, at intervals of one to five seconds. This sound is particularly distinct when the male is chasing the female, and I have heard it at a distance of at least ten yards. I think it is produced by both sexes.” Wallace observed the same thing at Para, and believed that it was produced in some way by the contact of two insects, as he only heard it when two insects were chasing or frolicking with each other, and it seems to be the general belief that the sound is common to both sexes, which Mr. Van Volxem positively asserts. But, as stated above, these sounds are emitted also by butterflies of the temperate regions. Thus Mr. Swinton, who has written a good deal upon this subject, states that the Small Tortoise- shell (Aglais urticae), about to hibernate and in a drowsy condition, was induced by him to depress and shut the wings successively, and ‘each time she testily performed this action I heard distinctly, as the fore wings were brought forward, when only the extreme basal portion of the wings was in contact, a sound soft and refresh- ing, like evening footsteps on the pavement, or BUTTERFLY SOUNDS 91 grating sand-paper.” The same thing has been observed long since by the Rev. Mr. Green in the European Peacock butterfly (Hamadryas io), who accidentally disturbed a colony of hibernating butterflies and heard a faint hissing noise issue from the cavity in which they were concealed, while the wings were slowly depressed and ele- vated ; the noise resembled “that made by blow- ing slowly with moderate force through the closed teeth.” The late Mr. Hewitson of England also observed the same thing in Hamadryas io, but compares the sound of the wings when rubbed together to the friction of sand-paper. Mr. A. H. Jones noted the same thing in a _ hibernating Mourning Cloak (Kuvanessa antiopa), which pro- duced a grating sound, and I have myself not only heard this butterfly make the noise while fanning its wings as it rested upon a window sill, but have artificially produced the same sound by rubbing the wings of a dead specimen together. Other butterflies, but tropical species, are also stated to produce such sounds. Thus Distant gives the observation of a Captain Godfery as noticing that one of a pair of a species of Thau- mantis (a genus allied to the great blue Morphos of South America), while flymg around its mate, 92 BUTTERFLY SOUNDS “produced a most curious crackling or rustling noise,’ which “ was evidently emitted at the crea- ture’s will, and was distinctly audible within two or three yards of the insect.” Fritz Miller, who adds his testimony to the clicking sound emitted by Ageronia, states that quite another butterfly, a species of Eunica, equally produces the noise, and he also heard a sound, even louder than that made by Ageronia, “produced by two small brown butterflies which I did not succeed in catching.” The sounds made by butterflies of the temper- ate zone and compared by nearly all observers to that of the abrasion of one rough surface upon another, more or less faint, would hardly seem at first sight to be entirely analogous to the clicking sounds made by their more noisy brethren of the tropics, but it is not impossible that they should be. Experiments made after death upon the Green Comma (Polygonia faunus) show that they must be capable of producing the same sounds as the Mourning Cloak (Euvanessa antiopa) ; and in this connection, an instance which occurred to me one summer on the top of Mt. Washington has a direct bearing; for while walking on the carriage road, I started up a pair of the former, BUTTERFLY SOUNDS 93 unobserved, just at my feet. I instantly stopped motionless to see whether they would settle again, when one of them, which had flown to a short distance, turned and flew rapidly back straight at my face, turning only when within three or four inches of my nose, and then suddenly whisking off with a distinct “ click” at turning. All the instances thus far given relate to the family Nymphalidae, and therefore the following instance recorded by Rev. A. E. Eaton of Eng- land is of unusual interest. He states that he heard Parnassius apollo make a rustling noise by ‘“‘ slowly flapping her wings” while clinging to a flower, ‘and scraping the hinder pair with her four posterior legs, which were thrust backwards simultaneously each time that the wings opened ;” it continued to do this even after the front wings were firmly held, but stopped when the hind wings were seized. The only persons who seem to have endeavored to discover the cause of these sounds are the late Mr. Doubleday and Messrs. Swinton and Hamp- son. Mr. Doubleday examined the species of the genus Ageronia in the British Museum in vain for any sufficient cause drawn from the external struc- ture of the animal. He found certain peculiarities, r 94 BUTTERFLY SOUNDS one of them a cavity on the under side of the upper wing near the region of the costal nervure, and another in the swollen part of the costal ner- vure of the same wing, both of them parts not covered by the hind wings in flight. He rightly disclaims any attempt to discover “a connection between either of these peculiarities in structure and the sound produced by the insect.” Mr. Swinton, however, in several places has attempted to show that the base of the anal veins of the front wing in the stridulous Vanessini and in Ageronia has a certain structure comparable to a file or lima, parallel indentations or slight striae being seen across its surface under a strong magnifying power. But this explanation can in no way answer, be- cause an exactly similar feature may be found in all the other veins of all these butterflies, there being nothing distinctive in the veins themselves, either in the front or hind wing, in the regions which naturally overlap. When one examines, however, the Vanessini of the temperate regions, he will discover that the hind wings are in many cases furnished not only with scales but with long, pointed bristles, and I at first thought that these bristles might be the cause of the sounds, although they seemed to be just as abundant in other parts BUTTERFLY SOUNDS 95 of the wing as in those which were naturally cov- ered by the opposite wing. But this peculiarity is not found at all in Ageronia. If, however, one will examine the surfaces brought into contact between the two wings in the insects known to produce audible sound, he will note that nearly all the scales on the under surface of the front wing and those on the upper surface of the hind wing next the base, that is, in just those portions of the wing which overlap each other, are much smaller and more erect than in any other part of the wing, even than those in the immediate vicinity; and by experiment can show that when these portions of the wing are rubbed together a rustling noise is produced, while in other butterflies, such as Brenthis, not nearly so much contrast appears. In Ageronia these scales have also a more or less conical shape, as if to intensify the sound produced by their rubbing, but of course one could not imitate by clumsy motion of the hand any possible “ click” from this source. Mr. G. F. Hampson, however, by dissection of Ageronia, has probably discovered the precise instrumentation by which the “click” is effected. At the base of the inner margin of the fore wing he finds a pair of curved horny hooks with enlarged 96 BUTTERFLY SOUNDS extremities, so placed that when the fore wing is moved up and down they play upon a pair of some- what similar processes attached to the thorax; these being abruptly released from contact when the wing reaches a certain angle, would be likely to produce a snapping sound or “ click.” Many observers have noted the peculiar move- ments of the wings of butterflies which are not accompanied by audible sounds, especially in the family Lycaenidae, where the hinder wings alone, erect when the insect is at rest, are rubbed to- gether in a curious way, giving them “the appear- ance of revolving disks,” as Mr. Wallace calls it; and many observers have attempted to discover whether any sound followed this motion, but none have succeeded in doing so. Yet any other expla- nation of the intent of the movement would seem to be almost out of place, inasmuch as it is invari- ably made by certain species, including many of our own native kinds, directly upon alighting, and at a time when there may well be no butterflies in sight. This movement of the hind wings has been repeatedly seen and remarked upon by observers in all parts of the world. Swinton thought he had found the source of the possible sound that may BUTTERFLY SOUNDS 97 result (none is perceptible to human ears) in the structure of the lowest vein of the front wing. He examined Callophrys rubi, and states that the vein is bare and “crossed at uniform distances by pro- nounced striae, which indicate internal diaphragms and constrict into a series of bead-like formations.” This statement has been accepted without exami- nation by some entomologists, yet it is not true. The vein is never bare of scales except when they have been rubbed off, and the markings seen by Swinton are either the threads of the inclosed tracheae or the lines of pockets for the attachment of the abraded scales. But what one does find Gn all Lycaeninae, apparently, certainly in all of our species) is that in the lowest interspace of the front wing, next the inner margin, there is a patch of scales of a different character and setting from any other scales on the under surface. The patch does not reach the base of the wing, nor extend much if any beyond the basal third of the wing, but occupies the whole width of the interspace, and is found in male and female alike, just as the wing movement is shared by both sexes; the scales are slenderer than those about them, subfusiform and bluntly pointed, and very often erect or nearly erect; but they have one other important quality 98 BUTTERFLY SOUNDS which it seems to me signalizes their use, in that in the midst of scales more lightly attached and easily removed than are those of any other but- terflies, it is impossible to remove one of these without breaking the wing; they are firmly set bristle-scales, and on the opposing part of the hind wings, in the marginal interspace, is a similar patch, not so characteristic, of rounded pavement- like scales. If any noise is produced by the move- ment of the wings, it must be by the agency of these two opposing fields. Special movements of some sort are made by a majority of butterflies; as for imstance in most of our Argynnini and other Nymphalinae, which gen- tly wave their wings upward and downward upon alighting, as if panting from their exertions. A marked instance of this is seen in the Red Admiral (Vanessa atalanta). Still more striking instances are the quivermg movements of the male settled beside the female; or of a butterfly eagerly suck- ing a flower when another alights beside it, and is thus warned to “keep its distance.” These mo- tions I am inclined to regard as movements for the sake of producing sound, though the sounds are inaudible to our ears. It is probable that this is on account of their faintness. There is a limit to BUTTERFLY SOUNDS 99 human perceptibility of sounds from their shrill- ness and also from their feebleness. It is known, but perhaps not well known, that there are a cer- tain number of saltatorial Orthoptera which can be seen to stridulate but whose sounds are inaudi- ble to our ears. From the fact that certain but- terflies produce sound during certain movements, we can hardly fail to believe that other butterflies making the same motion also produce sound, al- though inaudible to our ears. Nor are the sounds made by these friends of ours altogether limited to the butterfly state, a large number of caterpillars making sounds by striking their heads against the leaf upon which they are resting, or by swinging the head from side to side, catching the mandibles in the rough- nesses of the leaf or upon the silken strands which they have spun upon it, to produce a scraping sound to drive away intruders; and Schild states that the chrysalis of the Green Hair-streak (Callo- phrys rubi) when disturbed produces by its move- ments a slight sharp chirp, or, as Kleeman called it in 1774, a clicking noise. But though I have seen many chrysalids of Nymphalidae in exces- sively active motion, I have never observed any sound from this source. IX. NESTS AND OTHER STRUCTURES MADE BY CATERPILLARS THERE is considerable difference among the caterpillars of butterflies as to the amount of silk they spin. Some, and this is especially true of the Lycaenidae, and next of the Pierinae, spin very little and have apparently little use for it, being able to make their way about without weaving a carpet whereon to cling, though they ordinarily do spin some. Others seem unable to take a single step without laboriously spinning a thread wherever they would go, fastening it upon this side and that, and without it will venture nowhere. As a general rule nests of any sort are constructed only by the last-named, 1. e. by those most depend- ent upon a hold on silken strands to make their way. Yet there is one notable exception in a Mexican Pierid which constructs a web nearly as close as parchment. Nests, which are almost solely for purposes of NESTS MADE BY CATERPILLARS 101 concealment, are very generally made by those eaterpillars of butterflies which are gregarious, but there is one kind made by New England social caterpillars which has no such purpose and which is perhaps too simple to be properly called a nest. This is the web made, particularly in earlier life, by the caterpillars of the Mourning Cloak (Euvanessa antiopa), which move about much from place to place, spinning wherever they go, so that at last the line of movement, by successive strands thrown across every angle a twig makes with the larger stem, forms a sort of veil of silk over which they crawl with extreme rapidity, but without which their movements are greatly re- tarded. Some caterpillars have a favorite place of repose to which they come after every meal and which they carpet with silk for greater comfort. Of such are some of the swallow-tails, and it would seem as if the nest they constructed were at first an accidental result of this habit, perfected by its protective adaptation. These caterpillars rest upon the middle of the upper surface of a leaf, upon the floor of which they have stretched a silken carpet from side to side, each strand shorter than the last, so as to make the edges curl toward each other 102 NESTS AND OTHER STRUCTURES and sometimes to meet, and thus to form an open nest. : The most common form of nest, however, is that in which different parts of the same leaf or adja- cent parts of different leaves are fastened together by silken strands. The simplest and weakest of these are made by the caterpillars of the Green Comma (Polygonia faunus) and the Red Admiral (Vanessa atalanta), which fasten together very weakly the opposite edges of a single large leaf so as just to make them meet ; but the threads are so slight that they are ruptured with the slightest effort. The caterpillar within, having thus secured a shelter, seems loth to leave it and makes its meals from its own dwelling, until, having literally eaten itself out of house and home, it is forced to venture forth and construct another. Another form of nest made from a single leaf is constructed by all the higher skippers, Hesperini, in early life, and by many of them throughout life, by folding over a little piece of leaf, and fastening the edge to the opposite surface by a few loose strands of silk; to effect this they first bite a little channel into the leaf at just such a place as to leave a fragment of leaf neither too large nor too small to serve as a roof when they shall have MADE BY CATERPILLARS 103 turned it over; often they have to cut two chan- nels in order to procure a flap sufficiently small for their purposes ; and it is curious to watch one of these tender creatures, just as soon as it has devoured its egg-shell, struggling with a tough oak- leaf to build for itself a house. ‘These nests are much more firmly made, the silken fastenings being -composed of many strands, often very tough. On leaving one nest to construct a larger, the cater- pillar always, I believe, first bites off the threads of the old nest and gives the flap a chance to resume its position, which, however, it rarely fully does. When older, many of these same skippers find a single leaf of their food-plant too small to conceal them, and so they draw several leaves together just as they grow upon the plant, and, retaining them in the desired place by silken bands, live within the leafy bower. This mode of construction is adopted almost from the first by the Pamphilini which feed on grasses, the proximity of adjoining blades near the base affording a good chance to attach them together, while a cluster of blades furnishes a similar chance to construct the some- what tubular nest they require when they have grown large and fat. A nest composed of several leaves is not made 104 NESTS AND OTHER STRUCTURES by many other of our butterflies. The Red Ad- miral (Vanessa atalanta), however, especially when it is more than half grown, finds it easier to attach neighboring leaves of the thickly growing nettle than to find one sufficiently free to use it only; so that fully one half of the nests of the larger caterpillars are made from a number of leaves ; the nest is always roomy, capable of hous- ing several caterpillars, though never containing more than one. The nesting habits of the Red Admiral are — shared by the other species of Vanessa, with certain slight variations. In early life the Painted Lady (Y. cardui) tries to make the stiff and crenulate edges of thistle-leaves meet together, but with indifferent success, and so fills in the interstices with an exceedingly thin web, in no way conceal- ing it from sight. In after-life it forms an oval nest of the size of a pigeon’s egg, by fastening adjoining leaves together very slightly, and filling all the interstices with a similar flimsy web, upon which it fastens, or into which it weaves, bits of eaten leaf or parts of the inflorescence of the plant, still imperfectly concealing it from sight; and some- times it hangs itself up for chrysalis within the same narrow, and by this time very filthy, apart- deere wits CATERPILLAR NESTS MADE BY CATERPILLARS 105 ment. The Painted Beauty (V. huntera) makes a similar but rounder nest on the everlasting, and conceals itself very effectually by completely cover- ing the more compact but still very slight web, with the inflorescence of the plant. Another class of nests is that made by some of our Melitaeini (Cinclidia and Euphydryas), which, living in company, cover at first a few leaves, then the whole head of the plant, and eventually, some- times, the whole plant in a tolerably firm web, within which the company feed, until the whole becomes a nasty mess of half-eaten and drying leaves, and all sorts of frass, including their own excrement and cast-off pellicles, everywhere tangled with web. Within such a nest they hibernate, but not until they have strengthened it with denser web and drawn the leaves of the head more tightly, so that it becomes a mere bunch which one may cover with his hand, and which contracts the more, apparently as winter approaches. In the spring they evidently have had enough of this sort of communal life, and live thereafter in the open air. | But perhaps the most interesting nest of all is that made by the caterpillar of the Viceroy. This caterpillar hibernates when partly grown, and 106 NESTS AND OTHER STRUCTURES provides for the occasion a winter residence, which is occupied only during the cold season. For this purpose it eats the sides of a willow-leaf nearly to the midrib, for about one third the distance from the tip, ordinarily selecting for the purpose a leaf near the end of a twig; the opposite edges of the rest of this leaf it brings together, and not only fastens them firmly with silk but covers this nest outside and inside with a carpet of light-brown glossy silk, so that the leaf is nearly hidden ; nor is this all: it travels back and forth on the leaf- stalk and around the twig, spinning its silk as it goes, until the leaf is firmly attached to the stalk, and in spite of frost and wind will easily hang until spring. Following the projecting midrib, the caterpillar creeps into this dark cell, head fore- most, and closes the opening with its hinder seg- ments, all abristle with spines and warts. The other species of the same genus, the red-spotted and the banded purple, have the same habits ; the latter feeds on birches, and if we examine these trees in early spring, when all sorts of ichneumon flies are just beginning to wander about in search of prey, we can hardly fail to be struck by the de- ceptive resemblance these hibernacula of the banded purple bear to the opening buds and curving ter- MADE BY CATERPILLARS 107 minal shoots of the very twig on which they occur ; the color of the soft down of the buds and the enveloping silk of the hibernacula is as similar as are their forms, and this mimetic resemblance is doubtless as effective as it is interesting. X. POSTURES OF BUTTERFLIES AT REST AND ASLEEP BUTTERFLIES, as a general rule, are very dainty about alighting after flight, appearing to regard the position they shall take with some concern, hesitating more or less about the place they choose; sometimes they hover about a spot or approach and leave it many times before pitching ; at others two or three quivers of the wing are all that indicate their daintiness. Moths, on the contrary, usually come plump to a stop and settle, much as if they had been thrown at the spot; while among the butterflies, those that in this respect resemble the moths the most closely are the lowest family, the skippers, and some Nym- phalidae which are protected by their colors when alight. Alighted only for a brief rest, or to sun them- ‘selves, or to suck the juices of some flower, butter- flies usually keep the wings more or less spread wide open ; though in feeding, especially if it be AT REST AND ASLEEP 109 in companies, or at rest for a longer time, or, as it were, for observation, the wings are usually closed tightly back to back; among the Pam- philini, however, there is a very prevalent custom which oddly combines these two, the hind wings being held horizontal, the fore wings perpendicu- lar or a little oblique ; this gives them a curiously disjointed look, the purpose of which is not easy to see; perhaps a comparative study of the atti- tudes in males and females, or in those species in which the males have and those where they have not a discal stigma, may lead to some result. The need of feeding with erect wings is plain enough in certain instances, as where crowds mingle along the edge of a muddy rut in the road ; and that the same posture is almost invari- ably assumed at complete rest, as for the night,! is also easily explained, since that presents the least exposed surface, and one which far more than the upper side of the wings, sometimes very completely, resembles in tint and often in texture or markings the background chosen for rest. No creatures seem to be more sensitive than 1 Some Hesperini, which rest by day with outspread wings, sleep with roofed wings like moths, and very likely all of them do; we know little of their sleeping attitudes. 110 POSTURES OF BUTTERFLIES butterflies to warmth and sunshine. We have alluded in another place to the diurnal movements of even hibernating butterflies; and one is amused at watching with what precision a Melitaeid, for example, or a Polygonia, sidles around on alight- ing, to expose the broadest possible surface to the sun. Startle one of the latter, but not sufficiently to make it leave the spot, and with what a snap the wings close, and, in place of the burning colors which seem to have imbibed the sun’s warmth, your butterfly, with the dead leaf or dusty color of its under-surface brought to view, has become nearly invisible. Butterflies are not much given to walking, but in the use of their legs they have many little peculiarities which generally mark whole groups. Thus the Satyrids always walk by a series of nervous twitches in a very bungling fashion un- known, I believe, outside of this group. Many Theclini never remain on the surface of the leaf or twig on which they have pitched facing in the direction in which they have alighted, but turn part way around to face another way, and that with no reference to the sun; they do the same when the sun is wholly obscured. At sleep, the wings are packed away into the AT REST AND ASLEEP iat smallest compass, as already stated; with the exception of some Hesperini,! the wings are held erect back to back, the fore wings slid down be- tween the hind pair, so that only the latter and the apex and front edge of the former are visible. There is, however, more variety in the method of treating the antennae; some, like the Satyrinae, sleeping with these wide spread, others tucking them between the wings, others bringing them together beside the front edge of the wings; sometimes only the stalks of the antennae lie between the wings, the clubs appearing beyond as if crowded out by the tight shutting of the wings. In all cases where the antennae are brought to- gether this is the final action of the butterfly before complete repose; at first the antennae remain without, looking in different directions like sentinels; and it is only gradually that they are brought to the position of complete rest. The moralist tells us, and his warning is sec- onded by the psychologist, that as every repetition of an action makes it easier than before, so any propensity indulged in wears ruts, as it were, in _ 1 Wittfeld, however, says that the southern Euphoeades palamedes sleeps with spread wings, and I have seen a European Thais do the same in confinement. 112 POSTURES OF BUTTERFLIES our character, and habits become fixed; it is easier to travel given roads than others, and, what is fullest of portent, our propensities are plainly bequeathed to our descendants. The lives of frivolous butterflies admonish us in like fa- shion. Observe how wonderfully alike are the actions of butterflies of the same group, i. e., descendants of the same stock; their habits have become ingrained by repetition through the ages ; habits which it were almost certain destruction not to obey, since in nearly every one some pro- tective meaning may be found; habits which run so through groups that the keen observer may foretell the apparently untrammeled actions of creatures he has never seen alive, with as great a percentage of accuracy as the best- informed “‘ clerk of the weather” may predict the action of the morrow’s winds. The behavior of butterflies, then, has clearly its story to tell of the past and its relationships, and we shall not be likely to reach the fairest conclu- sions regarding the phylogeny of butterflies until we have given these their full value. Up to the present no proper investigation has been made in this direction ; only a few of the most patent of the tricks and ways of butterflies have been AT REST AND ASLEEP 113 noted; a wide and open field lies before the in- quirer, and it is for his use that I have tried now and then to bring together a few facts concerning the postures and behavior of butterflies in differ- ent circumstances. These are, however, still too few whereon to base any general statements likely to require no important modification on future investigation, and I leave them for the present barren of result, in the hope of enticing some one to enter a promising field, and perchance relieve these facts of their present stupidity. XI. THE EGGS OF BUTTERFLIES THE eggs of butterflies, except those of the gigantic Ornithopteras, are no larger than a pin’s head, yet when examined under a lens, which is of course required to see the structure of such minute objects, we may look far before discovering any- thing more graceful in form or delicate in seulp- ture; indeed, chancing to study some of our forms during a winter spent in Egypt, I was greatly struck by their singular resemblance to the trace- ried domes of the famous Cairo mosques. They are composed of a thin, elastic, and usually transpar- ent pellicle —so elastic that they will bound like a rubber ball when falling on a hard surface; where not transparent they are made opaque by cross- lines or ribs, by a general reticulation, or in some lower forms (Pamphilini) by a uniform density of the whole integument. They are always circular in cross-section, and in general are flattened on the surface of rest; by their form they may be EGGS OF BUTTERFLIES 115 divided into four classes: (1) barrel-shaped, (2) spherical, (3) tiarate or turban-shaped, and (4) hemispherical ; or, if we consider their surface sculp- ture, into three groups: (a) ribbed, (6) reticulate, and (c) smooth. These divisions run into each other to a greater or less degree, and nearly all possible combinations are found. With rare excep- tions nearly allied forms closely resemble each other, and the degree of resemblance is in general an excellent test of affinity. Not only can species and genera be distinguished by oological charac- ters, but many of the larger groups, even as far as the broadest natural divisions of butterflies, may not infrequently be defined in terms of the egg, so that it even becomes a valuable aid to classifica- tion. The barrel-shaped form is sometimes very much attenuated at both ends, so as better to be de- scribed as spindle-shaped, and it is nearly always broader at the base than at the summit, so as to merit the term pyramidal, sometimes much broader, as in Speyeria. The truncate top is also very fre- quently rounded and its edge inconspicuous, and it then runs into the spherical or hemispherical class ; but the true barrel-shaped group is always higher than broad. The Nymphalidae and Pierinae al- 116 THE EGGS most always belong to this group, and they are always vertically ribbed to some extent, but the ribs always terminate short of the centre of the summit, either gently or abruptly. Sometimes these ribs are coarse and irregular, running in zig- zag lines from base to summit, so that the egg might almost be regarded as coarsely reticulate ; in others the ribs are excessively compressed, mere films, placed edgewise to the body of the egg, glis- tening in the sunshine like dew-drops, and increas- ing in size to the summit, where they often form a sort of crown; or they may die out on the lower half of the egg, or fade into a weaker reticulation ; or, above, may terminate at the edge of a saucer- like depression which forms the cap of the egg; but everywhere, with more or less distinctness, be- tween these buttressing ribs, the surface of the egg is broken into quadrangular cells by delicate cross- ridges, which often increase in stoutness toward the main ribs, and in their turn buttress them. The spherical forms include particularly the Papilioninae, some Satyrinae and the Hesperini, unless these last more properly belong to the pre- ceding group. They are usually smooth, but may also be reticulated, or, as always in the Hesperini, ribbed. Yy Wy LIES EGGS OF BUTTERF OF BUTTERFLIES 117 The tiarate eggs are very beautiful objects, often reminding one of a miniature sea-urchin without spines, and are characteristic of the Lycaenidae, though some of them incline toward the hemispher- ical form, and all, without exception, are reticu- late. In these the surface is never ribbed, but generally covered with a heavy network of deep pits, whose bounding walls are rather coarse and rough. The eggs of the Parnassians resemble them closely. Finally the hemispherical eggs, generally more than half as high as broad, and with a slight flat- tened summit, are smooth, and comprise only the Pamphilini, if we except the reticulated Heodes, which possibly belongs here as much as with the turban-shaped eggs. As an architectural form, the egg of a butterfly is exquisitely patterned. With all the variation in sculpture and contour, every curve and every detail of chiseling is in subordination to a central fea- ture —all lead up to a distinct culminating area, the micropyle, or little rosette of cells of the most exquisite delicacy, which crowns the summit of the central vertical axis. Often requiring some of the higher powers of the microscope to discern, the cells are arranged in such definite and regular pat- 118 THE EGGS terns that in looking at them we seem to be peer- ing through the circular rose-window of a minia- ture Gothic cathedral. Sometimes, in the tiarate egos, this rosette is situated at the bottom of a very deep and narrow well, and can with difficulty be seen. Often their patterns would furnish use- ful hints to the decorator, and especially for all forms of embroidery. The cells which form the interior of the rosette are the points at which microscopic pores lead into the interior of the egg, and through which it is fertilized. With this in view, we can understand why this rosette should form the goal of movement of every part of the structure. When freshly laid, the eggs are generally of some shade of pale green, though in the Pamphi- lini, with their opaque shells, they are nearly chalky white; but during the development of the caterpillar (or of parasites) within, all sorts of colors may be assumed, often of a rich or almost gaudy hue. The eggs of butterflies are always laid in full view excepting that in a few instances they are partially concealed by being thrust into crevices. Usually hatching in a few days, they are generally laid upon the very leaves the caterpillar will eat or OF BUTTERFLIES 119 upon the stem close at hand; but when, as in some eases (only known among Lycaenidae), the egg remains all winter, the butterfly selects the stem, and, as an additional protection, chooses a spot next a leaf-bud, or other projection, or tucks the ego in some crevice of the bark. It is even stated by Salesbury, according to Rennie, and repeated by European writers, that the egg of the Black- veined White (Aporia crataegi) may last three years and then hatch, but the statement seems to me fairly open to doubt until verified. For ordi- narily the eggs of this species are laid in clusters (whether on leaf or twig I find no statement), and give birth the same year to caterpillars which win- ter in small clusters in webs. All butterflies which winter as eggs feed as caterpillars on trees or shrubs, never so far as known on herbaceous plants. As a general rule the eggs are laid singly, but in not a few cases, oftenest found in the Nymphalidae and Papilionidae, they are laid in clusters of from two or three to several hundreds. Sometimes these are rude bunches piled loosely or in layers one upon another; sometimes they are laid in more or less regular single or double rows; sometimes in a single column of three, or four, or even as many as ten eggs, one atop another; or they may girdle a twig like a fairy ring. XII. PSYCHOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES IN OUR BUTTER- FLIES WHE I first mentioned to a company of friends my intention to write an essay on this subject, a scornful laugh greeted me, as if I were testing their credulity. Yet no one, I fancy, could be a close observer of butterflies without noticing that, while there is no great difference between healthy individuals of the same species, there is as great a variety of temperament between different kinds as there is between different sorts of quadrupeds, to write an essay on whose psychological characters would excite no special comment; for the timidity of the hare, the cunning of the fox, the ferocity of the wolf, and other psychical characteristics of various beasts have become proverbial. In their relation to man one recognizes a great difference between butterflies as to how companion- able they may be. According to some writers, there would seem to be a certain variation among PSYCHOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES 121 the same kinds in different places, just as with other animals, according to the frequency with which they come in contact with man. Thus DeCandolle remarks that in the Swiss Alps the butterflies have no fear of man and readily settle on the colored dresses worn by the women, while on the better-inhabited plains they are not known to do anything of the kind. Their fear of man or their boldness is to a certain degree dependent upon their power of flight, as Belt has remarked in his ‘“‘ Naturalist in Nicaragua,” the swiftest and strong- est flyers allowing one to approach much nearer than those with weaker wings, feeling confident that they can dart away from any threatened danger. Yet entirely apart from this, one may roughly divide butterflies into domestic and feral, according to their habits and sympathies. Thus among the feral tribes should be ranked nearly all the Satyrinae, and especially such forms as the Arctic Satyr (Oeneis jutta), the Pearly Eye (Enodia portlandia), and the Little Wood Satyr (Cissia eurytus), and among the companionable sorts nearly all the species of Vanessini. In- stances of the boldness and even friendliness of the latter are not uncommon. “While I lingered here [says Abbott, one of our hap- 122 PSYCHOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES piest describers of the habits of beasts and birds| a pretty butterfly, the Red Admiral, alighted upon my knee as I was writing, and seemed wholly at ease in this unusual position. Something upon my clothes was attractive to it, and the graceful movements of its pro- boscis, and occasional down-dipping of one antenna and then the other, were amusing. I noticed that the right and left wing moved separately down and up, as though to retain the creature’s balance, which the wind threat- ened, and at each such movement of the wings the cor- responding antennae likewise dipped. This butterfly occasionally flew to the bushes near by, but never to remain long away, and sooner or later returned and was my companion for a great part of the day.” Instances of the vivacious and inquisitive ways of these butterflies are numerous. ‘The entomologist cannot fail to be aware of them. Seeing one alight upon the tip of a bough near by he strikes at it with his net, only to see it fly off in an appar- ent paroxysm of terror, while if he but stop a mo- ment he will see the runaway return, dash about him, and alight again upon the self-same spot in a defiant way, flirting its wings up and down, as who should say, “Try it again, will you?” For there is much that is sportive as well in the ways of many butterflies. One of my favorite modes of showing this characteristic to unbelieving friends IN OUR BUTTERFLIES 123 has been to toss my cap high in the air, when these butterflies will often dart, dash at, and play around it as it begins again to descend. DeGarmo has noticed this characteristic, as witness the following passage : — “ One of the most curious features of a butterfly’s life is its sportive or playful moods and ways. It was some time before I appreciated the fact that they indulged in such moods at all. Seeing them start vigorously after other insects on the wing, I assumed without investiga- tion that these were movements in self-defense, till all the facts pointed to them as movements in play. This opened a new and interesting field of observation. The spirit of playfulness I found to prevail more towards sundown than in the morning. Only a very few times have I seen any signs of it in the morning and never in the absence of sunshine. I found it far more common among the highly developed four-footed butterflies, as the Graptas, Vanessas, etc., than among the six-footed Papilios. . . . The greatest manifestation of fun and frolic was in a group of alopes, some thirty in number, clustered under a tree in the shade. Such wild gam- bols on the wing I never saw, often in one compact cluster, wings and legs and antennae in a confused jumble, then off in pairs, then in two crowds, with all the marks of ‘mirth and jocund din.’ Such scenes do certainly appear like an intelligent appreciation of fun, as they clearly have no reference to any necessary 124 PSYCHOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES functions of body, and seem intended only for gratifi- cation.” It is but a short step from these characteristics to that of pugnacity, which is manifested by none of our own butterflies so conspicuously as by the American Copper (Heodes hypophlaeas). Watch one on a hot and sunny day in a favorable place, and you will see the fellow dart at every passing object, be it butterfly large or small, or even a blundering grasshopper. So, too, the Buckeye (Junonia coenia) has been described by Jones as ‘‘a most pugnacious little creature, and appears to love a quarrel, for you may see three or four of them ascending in the air and buffeting each other, now rising, now falling, unremittingly continuing their aerial warfare.” How totally different this from the sluggish, lazy, easy-going manner of most of the Satyrids, with their dainty ways, tossing themselves in graceful throws in and out the shrubbery; or the hurried direct way of the species of Argynnis, or better of Eurymus, zigzagging from spot to spotas if on business of the greatest urgency, though not quite certain where it was; or the bustling self-impor- tant actions of the larger skippers. Even in the butterflies of wilder spots, less frequently seen, how IN OUR BUTTERFLIES 125 great a difference between the timid Gray-veined White (Pieris oleracea), which, though it feeds upon the produce of the garden, will scarcely let you approach in any near proximity, and the showy Red-banded Purple (Basilarchia arthemis) that will allow you to approach and pick it up with the fingers. What a contrast between the dignified Monarch (Anosia plexippus) moving imperturbably along its own way, undisturbed by the attacks of the smaller butterflies which dash about it, and the vascillating dainty blues which cannot make up their minds just what to do; or between the wary artful White Mountain butterfly (Oeneis semidea) and the bold and careless Tiger Swallow-tail (Jasoniades glaucus). How rarely one sees collected in one spot on a flower or about a moist spot more than two or three American Coppers (Heodes hypo- phlaeas) ; they are too vicious and quarrelsome to be companionable. How different the equally active but eminently social Clouded Sulphur (EKurymus philodice) or Red-banded Purple (Basilarchia arthemis), which congregate by hundreds, as do also the Tiger Swallow-tail (Jasoniades glaucus) and many others. The cunning ways of the White Mountain butterfly (Oeneis semidea) in its rocky defenses are elsewhere mentioned, and a simi- 126 PSYCHOLOGICAL PECULIARITIES lar wiliness appears in others, sometimes shown in a mock stupidity, as it were, flying, as you cau- tiously pursue, just beyond the reach of your net, moving with greater and greater swiftness as you increase your speed, all the while against the wind, when suddenly, after a quick movement upward, they open their wings to the breeze and are car- ried far behind you, thus evading the pursuit which they found becoming irksome, and leaving you heading the wrong way. XIII. SOCIAL CATERPILLARS As a general rule, caterpillars of butterflies live solitary lives throughout their entire existence. The mother drops an egg here and there upon a spot suitable for the food of its young, and here the caterpillar takes up its abode with more or fewer wanderings. In two of the four families of butter- flies there is scarcely a single exception known to this rule, but in the highest family and in a few instances in the Papilionidae, caterpillars during at least a portion of their lives are more or less gregarious. Whenever the caterpillars are strictly gregarious, the eggs are invariably laid in clusters ; there are, however, some butterflies which lay their egos in small clusters, whose caterpillars are not properly gregarious ; yet all such are closely re- lated to others whose caterpillars are gregarious, so that we find every gradation from solitary to social. There are also some caterpillars which are gre- garious in their early life, but afterward part com- 128 SOCIAL CATERPILLARS pany. In such cases the caterpillar usually hiber- nates, and its social life lasts to some degree throughout the autumn and winter, the company dispersing at the renewal of activity in the spring. Indeed, in almost all cases, the association is most conspicuous in early life, when the caterpillars feed in rows upon the same leaf in such close proximity that it would seem to interfere with convenience. Sometimes this is the only mark of their social na- ture; but as all caterpillars spin more or less silk in moving about, a web of greater or less extent generally accompanies a colony, and in some cases the community constructs a close structure within which they retire to rest or to moult. A Mexican butterfly, allied to our sulphurs, constructs a web, first noticed by Hardy, which is nearly as close as parchment. With rare exceptions, all butterfly caterpillars feed upon the outside of plants; but there are a few which live in the interior, and one of these, an Indian species of Lycaenidae, is known to be social, living in numbers within the fruit of the pomegranate. Among our own butterflies, there is nearly every gradation from brief and partial companionship up to a social life which lasts throughout the entire period of larval existence. The weakest form of SOCIAL CATERPILLARS 129 social life is found in some of the Polygoniae (others being purely solitary), where the eggs being often laid in columns of from two to nine, or several eggs being scattered by the mother upon one leaf, the caterpillars in earliest life are natur- ally found feeding upon one leaf. Rarely are more than four or five found in company, and each takes up its independent position upon the leaf and acts as if the others were not present. As, however, it is their habit to remain upon the leaf until it is almost eaten, they naturally leave it at the same or nearly the same time, and, following a similar instinct, are apt to pass together to the nearest leaf, but scatter more or less, so that by degrees as they approach maturity they are found widely separated from each other. Yet even in this weakest form their numbers are often so great upon a single plant that when they leave it for pupation the chrysalids hang almost in company, thirty or forty spinning their silken shrouds in such proximity that they may be pulled down together. A somewhat similar or perhaps weaker case may be found in the Cabbage butterfly (Pieris rapae), which often lays a considerable number of eggs singly upon one plant, and the caterpillars, naturally seeking the interior of the 130 . SOCIAL CATERPILLARS cabbage-head, may often be found in close prox- imity. But this even more than the preceding is a case of mere accident, from the nature of the food-plant upon which they subsist. In all other cases of social life among our caterpillars the eggs are laid by the parent in decided clusters. The slightest of these is probably that of the Blue Swallow-tail (Laertias philenor) the masses being ordinarily confined to a dozen or so. The cater- pillars in this case not only feed in company but, in earliest life at least, range in rows along the edge of the leaf they are eating, with their heads toward the eaten portion; and in this way they live during at least the earlier half of their lives, scattering more or less after the third moult upon separate leaves, so that at maturity rarely more than one is found upon a single leaf, though the leaf of their food-plant is exceptionally large. This alteration of habit from companionship to solitariness is a natural incident due to growth. Up to the end of the third moult the size of the caterpillar has not increased enough to make it a conspicuous object, but by the time the third moult is passed the caterpillar is half grown, and during this stage and the next its size becomes an impor- tant element in its security; and this alone is suffi- SOCIAL CATERPILLARS 131 cient to account for the fact that mature cater- pillars of butterflies are rarely found in company. It is at this stage, too, that in many instances, the winter season overtakes the caterpillar and it hiber- nates; and since in the spring it revives when the plants have put forth but tender leaves, impossible to nourish more than one or at most two such ravenous beasts as now come out of their winter quarters, such a change of habit would seem to be compulsory. Possibly the change in habit which generally takes place at this middle period of caterpillar life, even when winter does not intervene, is an inheritance from a common ancestor whose habits were fixed by the necessity of hibernation at this age. As far as our own fauna is concerned, the great mass of social caterpillars are found in the high- est family, the Nymphalidae, and indeed in the sub-family, Nymphalinae, in which this habit is found in most of the principal groups. In some instances, as we have related of the Blue Swallow- tail (Laertias philenor), the caterpillars in early life live exposed upon the surface, generally the under surface, of the leaf, ranged side by side, feeding and sleeping in unison. But in most some sort of web is constructed by the caterpillars upon 132 SOCIAL CATERPILLARS or beneath which they live, and to which, should they wander beyond its limits for food, they retire for rest and moulting. Some use this web with certain alterations in its structure as a winter resi- dence, but then invariably leave it on the approach of spring and part company, though often being "still found in near proximity. Others leave it at the hibernating season to seek, each for himself, his own hiding-place. Perhaps of all our caterpillars, although it con- structs but a slender web, the Mourning Cloak (Euvanessa antiopa) is the most preéminently so- cial. The eggs are laid in a cluster of greater or smaller size around a terminal twig, which they leave together, and as if by common impulse range themselves side by side in compact rows along a chosen leaf. ven if they are separated forcibly from each other, they come together again and re- arrange themselves. When disturbed they will simultaneously strike an attitude of alarm and turn their heads in unison as if worked by a machine. The web they form is simply that which they make as they crawl about, each following hurriedly in the track of its predecessor, and as it moves adding its thread to the carpet upon which it treads; and SOCIAL CATERPILLARS 11838 being social throughout their life they are more than usually destructive to foliage, stripping branch after branch, and wandering to the very tips until these are borne down by the weight of the mass. It would seem probable that our Eugonia has the same habits from what we know of its European congener, but if so it is exceedingly strange that in only one instance has the caterpillar been seen in this country, and then but a single one, proba- bly one which was hastening to seek a place in which to pupate. Although it is not stated whether the caterpillar concerned belongs to a butterfly or to a moth, a very curious and interesting case of strict commen- salism has been noted by Fritz Muller in South America, in which a large spiny caterpillar was almost invariably found accompanied by a small hairy caterpillar, so small as to rest securely in a transverse position across the back of its good- natured host, well concealed among its spines; in proof of its continued existence at this point the skin of the host was hardened beneath the tread of its little guest, so as to have become distinctly more callous than in other parts. Just what ad- vantage this would be to either party, both be- 134 SOCIAL CATERPILLARS ing feeders upon vegetable matter, it would be difficult to say, excepting that the spinous sur- roundings might well be of assistance in protecting the smaller beast. But this neat observation of Miller seems to open a field of possible investiga- tion which may have great interest. XIV. THE FIXITY OF HABIT IN BUTTERFLIES THE habits of butterflies are of extreme anti- quity. They are ingrained into the very texture of their lives. They are older than, or at least as old as, the patterns which adorn their wings. Moreover butterflies have two sets of habits, and these statements are equally true of either. The habits of their earlier life as a crawling caterpillar find no place in their aerial life on the wing, and vice versa; although in some we may find certain common characteristics shared by the two, as in the leisurely ways of the Satyrinae. That this is true follows from the fact that cer-_ tain special habits characterize large groups. Thus the mode of flight of the Satyrinae, which toss themselves lazily up and down as they move lei- surely from spot to spot, is found to a greater or less degree in all the members of the sub-family ; even in our White Mountain butterfly (Oeneis semidea) which inhabits a place and is subjected to external 136 THE FIXITY OF HABIT conditions so different from the others; but it is not found elsewhere among butterflies. The cater- pillars of this same group are universally slow in their movement, there being not a rapid traveler among them. All the caterpillars of the Nymph- alini hunch themselves, the better to display their largest tubercles. One of the most curious in- stances we may cite is the habit of rubbing the erect hind wings together shortly after alighting by all or nearly all the Lycaeninae, certainly by members of each of its three tribes, and so far as we know it is done by no other butterflies. The darting, skipping flight of the Hesperidae is an- other instance, as well as the odd style in which the Pamphilini hold their wings when alighted and alert, the hind wings horizontal, the fore wings ver- tical or oblique. Peculiarities of nest-building are generally shared by a caterpillar with many allies, perhaps by the whole tribe to which it belongs. Slight tricks of movement, as of the sudden elec- tric flirting of the wings when alarmed, or of the position of the antennae, are shared by many. This is equally true of the manner and place of alighting. Who ever saw one of the Lycae- nini settle instantaneously likea Pamphilid? How it doubts whether it has found the best place, IN BUTTERFLIES 137 or whether on the whole it will alight now or not ! So one might go through the whole catalogue of the ways and lives of butterflies to find that the great majority were ways and lives not of one but of many, — inherited traits, become fixed in their lives by constant repetition. Most frequently they are generic habits rather than specific, often tribal traits, or even sub-family tricks; this in itself shows that habit as a general thing must be older than the wing pattern. But if anything more were needed to show it, it would appear by the facts of mimicry, where pattern plainly shows a far greater pliancy to the summons of natural selection than can be affirmed of habit; and the numerous cases of protective resemblance tell equally the same story ; here habit has often moulded pattern, or at most they have abetted each the other. As we must invariably discard the slightest notion of any- thing intentional on the part of the protected form, we cannot say, for instance, that the White Moun- tain butterfly alights on a gray rock, in preference to the ground or a twig of Vaccinium, in order to gain the protection afforded by the resemblance of the under surface of its wings to the mottled rock, but rather that the protective coloring arose from 138 FIXITY OF HABIT its habit of alighting here, while the secondary habit of tilting the wings to heighten the mimicry arose pari passu with the mottling. If all this be true, a knowledge of the out-door life of our friends, both as crawling worms and as winged sylphs, may be of the utmost aid in attempts to note the interrelationships of nature; and these as well as features of actual structure must be accorded due weight in our classifications; but neither should be divorced from its fellow. XV. HOW BUTTERFLIES PASS THE WINTER ONE would suppose that nature would have so arranged matters that delicate creatures like but- terflies, passing a portion of their lives (the chry- salis) in a quiescent condition, would select the winter as the season in which to pass this state, and not waste in an enforced inactivity the pre- cious moments of a too brief summer, when flowers and succulent plants are abundant as food for butterfly or caterpillar. Yet a very consider- able proportion of the butterflies of New England pass the winter in some other state than that of the chrysalis. Some pass it in either of two or more states, apparently as a precaution against the total destruction of the species. Many pass the winter as caterpillars, some as eggs, and not a few as butterflies themselves. Many of the Theclini for instance pass the winter in the egg state, while on the other hand the Vanessini, a group which, whether in Europe or America, may 140 HOW BUTTERFLIES be considered as almost characteristically pertain- ing to the temperate zone, where the winter is pronounced, pass the winter in the imago state. One reason for this is that there is nearly always an autumn brood of butterflies which disport themselves in great numbers in the latter part of the year, but have not time to undergo further transformations so as again to reach the chrysalis stage before winter would cut them off; but in some instances some of the chrysalids which should produce the autumn brood do not give out the butterfly until the following spring. Accord- ing to Wiesenhitter such chrysalids of the Mourning Cloak (Euvanessa antiopa) as pass the winter are presumably females, masmuch as the female, according to his observation, is generally fresh-colored in the spring, whereas the males are always very much battered and worn. So far as we know, in the case of these wintering butterflies, pairing always takes place in the spring. Those hearing for the first time of the existence of butterflies in winter naturally inquire where the butterflies may pass the winter period. Each species has its own peculiar hiding-places, but in general they may be found beneath piles of rocks, in hollow places in the trunks of: trees, especially PASS THE WINTER 141 near the roots, beneath the rafters of old build- ings, in corded wood in the forest, and even in some instances probably simply hanging beneath the branches of trees. Thus Landois saw the European Peacock butterfly (Hamadryas io) take up its winter quarters in an ivy, hanging from a branch by its hind legs, folding all its other legs on its breast and closing its wings. During a warm spell in the early spring it disappeared, only, when the weather again changed, to return to the same spot and reassume its former position. Woodmen sometimes, in cleaving open a tree, will discover a little colony of hibernating butter- flies, as has been done in the ease of the Monarch (Anosia plexippus); and Goossens of Paris, in beating small trees over his open umbrella (a favorite mode of collecting) in the cold days of November, twice brought down the Comma butter- fly (Polygonia c.-album) which fell upon its feet with closed wings. It would seem that they must therefore have chosen the under side of the branches for hibernation. He made some inter- esting observations upon these, bringing them home and placing one in an unwarmed apartment, the other in the open air on the northeast side of a window. They did not stir until February, when 142 HOW BUTTERFLIES they resumed their activity. The one in the open air had experienced a temperature of at least —5°C., and Goossens discovered that numbness only comes on at —2°C., for when it was warmer their position showed that they appreciated the difference between day and night. At such a time the hind wings are kept motionless, but in the daytime the fore wings are advanced, so that the inner margin is at right angles to the body; at dusk, the fore wings creep backward and finally pass partly behind the hind wings, nearly filling the empty space between the two wings in this genus, due to their great excision. The process is again reversed in the morning, showing that the butterflies are not completely benumbed and, however quiet, recognize the distinction between night and day. One November day a Mourning Cloak (Kuvan- essa antiopa) flew into my cellar and took up its position on one of the risers of the stairway just beneath the projecting edge of the tread above, the extremity of its wings projecting beyond the tread. Here it remained for three months with- out moving, except that it shifted its position six or eight times in the course of the winter, some- PASS THE WINTER 143 times forward, sometimes backward within the range of about an inch. At first the plane of the closed wings was perfectly horizontal, but about the middle of January they became slightly oblique, and the morning of the day it left its station the obliquity was somewhat increased. It was watched daily the winter through, and the wings were always in the attitude taken at com- plete repose in the summer. When on the last day of February it left its station it took up an- other, head downward on the cellar wall, near a window where it caught the sun’s rays ‘a part of the day, and here it remained motionless for five days more, except for slight shifts as before, and that when the sun struck it its antennae were thrust forward and parted a little instead of being ensconced between the wings. All hibernating butterflies, so far as known at present, belong to the Nymphalidae and Papi- lionidae, and almost exclusively to the Vanessini and Rhodocerini, neither Lycaenidae nor Hesperi- dae being known to hibernate in the perfect stage. Almost all the Vanessini of Europe as well as the Brimstone butterfly (Colias rhamni) are known to hibernate in the imago state, and in our own 144 WINTERING BUTTERFLIES country Anosia plexippus, all the Polygonias, Eugonia j.-album, Euvanessa antiopa, Aglais mil- berti, all the species of Vanessa and Junonia coenia, as well as Hypatus bachmanii, and among the Rhodocerini Callidryas eubule and Xanthidia nicippe. XVI. THE OLDEST BUTTERFLY INHABITANTS OF NEW : ENGLAND THAT a vast sheet of ice once covered New England has been so long known as to be common intellectual property. The great mass of drift which covers the entire face of the country is too conspicuous to be overlooked by any observing person. ‘That we have indications of a former ice period in the present inhabitants of the district is perhaps not so well known by all. That such should be recognized among the butterflies appears at first blush surprising; yet a careful investiga- tion of the butterfly fauna of New England, and its comparison with that of neighboring parts of the country, show that the nearest allies of no incon- siderable portion of our butterflies now exist in the far north, in regions where the summer still retains the retarding influence of the frozen zone, or they may be found still feeding close beside the existing glaciers of arctic lands. To mention only the 146 THE OLDEST BUTTERFLY most conspicuous instances which we have, we would recall the two butterflies before referred to, as now found exclusively upon the barren summits of the White Mountains, and at no other point in or near New England. The most striking feature in their occurrence is the fact that the genera into which these two but- terflies fall have an altogether special interest of great significance in this connection ; for they are exclusively or very largely arctic, and there are but three other such genera known in the whole butterfly world. These others are Erebia, of which there are some examples in subarctic Amer- ica and in the Rocky Mountains; Agriades, which hardly comes nearer to us than Labrador, and is found again in the high mountains of the western half of our continent; and Eurymus, which is less exclusively arctic than the others, having represent- atives also over almost the entire globe, excepting in tropical countries, and of which we have three species in New England, one of them subarctic. Oeneis, the genus to which one of our Mt. Wash- ington forms belongs, occurs elsewhere only in high mountain regions, and, with but one or two exceptions, beyond forest limits, whether toward the pole or the zenith. Several species occur INHABITANTS OF NEW ENGLAND 147 among the mountains of our west, one is found in the Alps of Switzerland, and one in the Hima- layas. Brenthis, however, the other White Moun- tain genus, while occurring as far north as butter- flies are known (two or three species having been found by the very shores of the Arctic Ocean, in Greenland and Grinnell Land), is represented more largely by species occurring in the temperate zone, and we have in New England itself two of such species. In keeping with this distribution of these genera, the White Mountain Oeneis is not only confined to the barren summits of the range, but even, as we have found, to the higher parts of this region, although its food-plant, Carex, is found everywhere above the forest. The White Mountain Brenthis, on the other hand, very rarely occurs in the same district with Oeneis, being almost wholly confined to the lower half of the barren region. Its food-plant, though not known, is presumed to be violets, which are found in scanty numbers in the strictly alpine district, a sin- gle species being found in favorable spots ; but they are sufficiently abundant in the subalpine zone. These two butterflies, then, may be looked upon as the oldest inhabitants of New England, which followed the retreating ice-sheet in its progress 148 THE OLDEST BUTTERFLY northward, and whose brethren, thought by some to be even forms of the same species, still cling to the borders of the ice region of the north. They were the first of their tribe to fly over the barren fields of New England when the earliest verdure began to follow the withdrawing ice, and, moving with it step by step, were at last, some of them, beguiled by the local glaciers which remained in the White Mountain region long after the main glacial sheet had left these mountains far in its rear, and until connection with the main body was finally cut off. As one of our writers, Grote, has expressed it : — “Return became at length impossible. They ad- vanced behind the deceiving local glaciers step by step, up the mountain side, pushed up from below by the warm climate, which to them was uncongenial, until they reached the mountain peak, now bare of snow in the short summer. Here, blown sidewise by the wind, they patiently cling to the rocks; or in clear weather, on weak and careful wing, they fly from flower of stem- less mountain-pink to blue-berry, swaying from their narrow tenure of the land. Drawn into the currents of air that sweep the mountain’s side, they are forced downwards, to be parched in the hot valleys below. Yet they maintain themselves; they are fighting it out on that line.” INHABITANTS OF NEW ENGLAND 149 It may here be remarked that botanists have not yet distinguished two zones of life above the trees in our White Mountains, but only between those plants that are found exclusively in that region or in the high north, and those which, while found there in greatest abundance, are also found decid- edly out of it. But my own casual observation of the comparative abundance of certain flowers over the districts I have distinguished as upper alpine and lower alpine leads me to believe that a careful survey of the field would bring one to the same conclusion as I have drawn in the case of the but- terflies. Moreover, Agassiz noted many years ago certain distinctions, as the following extract from his “‘ Lake Superior” shows : — “ Above this level the mountain is naked, and many fine plants make their appearance which remind us of the flora of Greenland, and many of which grow on the northern shores of Lake Superior, such as Arenaria groenlandica, Vaccinium caespitosum, uliginosum, etc. The summit of the mountain, at the height of six thousand two hundred and eighty feet, produces several plants which have no representatives south of Labrador. Such are Andromeda| Cassiope | hypnoides, Saxifraga riv- ularis, Rhododendron lapponicum, Diapensia lapponica.”’ The phenogamous vegetation of the whole dis- 150 THE OLDEST BUTTERFLY trict is indeed pretty well known, but it would be well to prepare full catalogues of the plants found in every distinct centre of alpine vegetation, with their comparative abundance at each place. Thus in the immediate vicinity of Mt. Washington we should have separate comparative lists of plants of the elevated plateaus, of the borders of the Lakes of the Clouds, the base of the southerly cliff of Mt. Monroe, the boggy area above the Fall of the Thousand Streams, the neighborhood of the snow-field in Tuckerman’s Ravine, the Alpine Garden, etc., with special notes upon the heights at which they are found as nearly exact as possi- ble. The study, too, of the other insects of this region is just as instructive as is that of the but- terflies or the plants. Thus among the moths of the genus Agrotis alone, Mr. Grote finds no less than three species, imperita, islandica, and carnea, which occur, besides on these lofty summits, only in Labrador and in Lapland or Iceland, while a considerable number of other moths and of Cole- optera are also known, inhabitants otherwise only of the high north. It will naturally be asked how it is possible that insects, and especially such delicate organisms as butterflies, can maintain themselves in such a bleak INHABITANTS OF NEW ENGLAND 151 and inhospitable region as the summit of the White Mountains, where a Greenlander would find it impossible to live in comfort, masmuch as he would be exposed not merely to the cold to which he is no stranger, but to the fiercest and most bit- ing winds, with an amount of humidity accom- panying them which would seem to be almost fatal to existence. In the case of our two butterflies it is tolerably certain that both of them pass the winter in the caterpillar stage, concealed in cre- vices of rocks beneath the mantle of snow, so that they are free from the sweeping wind, and have nothing but the rigors of the extremely long and cold winter to encounter. For protection during the brief existence of the butterfly life itself, there is a very plain provision on the part of nature in the protective colors of the wings. Especially is this the case with the Oeneis which, on alighting (which it ordinarily does on the bare gray rocks), invariably closes its wings back to back and settles upon one side as if reclining, the point of the wings away from the wind, where it clings to the rough- nesses of the rocks, and is seldom blown from its foothold. In this position the peculiar gray mot- tling of the under surface of the exposed portions of the wings so closely resembles the gray rocks 152 THE OLDEST BUTTERFLY themselves, flecked with minute brown and yellow- green lichens, that it is almost impossible to dis- cover one in its resting-place unless one has seen it alight. The resemblance is of a very marked character, and is unquestionably a great means of protection. With regard to the Brenthis, we have here again a case of protective resemblance, though to a less extent; for in the brilliant red and ashy checkered surface of the under wings, seen when the insect is at complete rest, we have contrasted colors fre- quently to be met with in the subalpine region in the latter part of the season when frosts have begun their work. But whether these protective resemblances are very necessary in a district where so few birds are found— hawks and snow-birds being almost the only persistent inhabitants — may perhaps be doubted, and the markings which we find on these insects may be only their ancestral inheritance, useful on the arctic barrens where birds are more various and plentiful. The Bren- this indeed seems really doomed to destruction. In the scanty numbers that one may find upon the mountain slopes, one sees the sign of their early departure; for, in the many years that I have searched for them with special pains, I have never E. BUTTERFLIES OLDEST N. : ss - i rau A - r - = J . <2 = ee A, , : a = va _* ae en f Sy 4 ; ae ‘ : ym he ow oT a io j . pee eee kd ‘ : ne INHABITANTS OF NEW ENGLAND 158 seen more than a dozen or two specimens in a sin- gle day. Yet this is not at all true of Oeneis, and one hardly need to be anxious, in our generation at least, concerning its persistence, for the butter- fly is as abundant in its native haunts in proper season as almost any of the more favored inhabit- ants of lower levels. XVII. PROTECTIVE COLORING IN CATERPILLARS CONSIDERING mimicry in butterflies, we pointed out that it was not the least among the strange elements of that phenomenon that these extraordi- nary departures from a normal type should be gained purely for protection during the final days of a life, the earlier periods of which were subject to far greater dangers than the later. When, however, we come to examine the earlier stages themselves, though we shall find, as far as I am aware, no cases of parastatic mimicry, we do find that protective colors and markings, if not striking, are at least very general; so general, indeed, that it might be questioned whether there exists a single one of the caterpillars of our butter- flies whose markings do not serve in some special way for its protection. Lubbock and Weismann have pointed out that caterpillars of Lepidoptera generally are green in their earliest stage. This, however, is not univer- PROTECTIVE COLORING 155 sally true. Within the narrow scope of our own butterflies we have many instances in which this is not the case. The caterpillar of Oeneis macouni is even brilliantly striped ; those of several species of Papilioninae are almost black with a white saddle, and there are many others, like Kurymus and Basilarchia, which, though having certainly a green tinge, are nevertheless so obscured by other colors as to have a dusky effect which is at most only greenish. But the fact remains that as a very general rule caterpillars of butterflies as well as of moths are when hatched nearly of the color of green leaves, and the various modifications which we find in the mature form of our different cater- pillars are gained during growth. This change of coloration and of markings which takes place during life is oftenest assumed after the second ecdysis, and, what is noteworthy, it is just then that the size of the caterpillar itself becomes materially enlarged. At the end of its second stage the little caterpillar is rarely more than two or three times as long as at birth, while the rate of growth subsequent to that is so great that in its mature condition it is ordinarily twenty or more times as long as at birth, and its bulk increases in a far greater ratio. The change of 156 PROTECTIVE COLORING color and of markings has, therefore, direct relations to its visibility, and it is in this later period, even more than in the earlier, that we see how completely colors which are protective have established themselves. It is now that those ob- lique streaks upon the sides of the body are apt to show themselves, which, as Lubbock has pointed out, diverge from the general line of the body at much the same angle that the nervures of a leaf part from the midrib. Often the color of these streaks is graduated into the ground color in a manner which closely resembles the shadows of a raised vein upon a leaf, but it is only when we examine such objects in free nature that we see how perfect the deception becomes. As Lubbock has pointed out, longitudinal stripes are very common markings, and are most common and indeed almost universal upon such caterpillars as feed upon grasses and other elongated forms of vegetation, while they are comparatively rare upon such as feed upon broad-leaved plants. This is well exemplified by a comparison of the caterpillars of our Satyrinae and Pamphilini with those of most Vanessini, in the latter of which, though longitudinal markings are not unknown, they are almost invariably broken up or confused with IN CATERPILLARS 157 mottlings so as to lose much of their force. The green color of all our Rhodocerini and Pierini also, notably of the Little Sulphur (Eurema lisa), which feed upon broad-leaved plants and lie exposed upon the surface beside the midrib or prominent vein, conceals them almost completely from view even when the eye is fastened upon them. The long and slender form of Anthocharis with its striking longitudinal stripes would seem to render it a conspicuous object, but if seen upon the lank vegetation upon which it grows beside the long drawn seed pods, it would hardly be noticed. Caterpillars like our Argynnids, which conceal themselves upon the ground, are almost black, and can hardly be distinguished excepting when in motion. Even the color of the huge caterpillar of the Tiger Swallow-tail (Jasoniades glaucus) is such an exact imitation of that of the leaf upon which it rests, whose sides it has so turned up that no profile view may be had of it, that it does not readily catch the eye. The few exceptions we have among our butter- fly caterpillars, where striking and conspicuous colors obtain, are perhaps not easily explained. In some, doubtless, the colors may be regarded as warning colors, indicating the unpalatable nature 158 PROTECTIVE COLORING of the creature, as in the case of the Monarch (Anosia plexippus). But there are others, such as the Variegated Fritillary (Euptoieta claudia) and Harris’s butterfly (Cinclidia harrisii), where we know no reason for holding such a view; and it is a little perplexing when we come to examine the large, naked, and exposed caterpillars of our Papilioninae, as of the Blue Swallow-tail (Laertias philenor) for instance, its black body with pro- jecting orange points set off vividly against the deep green of the Aristolochia, or the gay bodies of Iphiclides and Papilio with their transverse stripes of brilliant orange, green, and black, — it is perplexing, I say, to assert that these are warn- ing colors given to show the inedibility of the caterpillar, possibly indicated also by the nauseous odor of the osmateria, when in two other of our own genera, Jasoniades and Euphoeades, with the same osmateria, we have protective colors of no mean importance. They may, however, be ex- plained, at least in part; for the caterpillars of Laertias conceal themselves beneath the broad leaves of Aristolochia so as not readily to be found but for the marks of their presence in their droppings; and although one finds it difficult to look upon the colors of the Black Swallow-tail IN CATERPILLARS 159 (Papilio polyxenes), the more striking of the other two mentioned, as in any sense protective, it is nevertheless true, as pointed out by Poulton with regard to the similarly colored species, the Swallow- tail of Europe (P. machaon), that the protection afforded by the coloring of these insects is “ very real when the larva is on the plant, and can hardly be appreciated at all when the two are apart.” Poulton, therefore, distinguishes between gen- eral protective mimicry, which, he says, is “such an appearance in an organism that the artistic effect of its surroundings is sufficiently reproduced in it to prevent attention from being attracted when the one is seen in the midst of the other,” m fact simply a general harmony with its sur- roundings ; and special protective mimicry, where protection is gained by the acquisition of a special appearance. Slater has urged that gaily colored protected caterpillars feed upon poisonous plants like Euphorbiaceae, Asclepiadaceae, Aristolochia, etc. ; perhaps experimentation might show how much value there is in this suggestion. One further point may be alluded to. It is well known that the caterpillars of many species of Lepidoptera are dichromatic in their later life, some of the forms being brown and others green. 160 PROTECTIVE COLORING This has nothing whatever to do with sex or with food, and Poulton argues that in these cases both colors are protective, and that the species (though in no way either dichromatic form) is advantaged, because when once discovered by an enemy others of the same color would then be more easily found by this enemy (a reason which would appeal to every field entomologist) ; so that while one form might suffer the species would be saved through the escape of the other. Weismann believes that this change has been brought about by natural selection, but Semper urges that selection “ could not possibly effect any alteration in the pigment, but could only operate after such a change had actually occurred.” Closely allied to this is the well-known fact that, in a number of our cater- pillars and particularly in those of the Papilioninae, an entire change of color takes place just previous to pupation. The period of pupation is probably the most hazardous for an insect, as far as its active external foes are concerned, it being abso- lutely helpless in this period and in a very sensitive state. The time required for the change is much greater in any one species than for ordinary ecdysis in the same species ; and whatever the purpose of the change in coloration may be, it will hardly fail IN CATERPILLARS 161 to be noticed that in general all vivid colors are subdued and entirely neutral tints assumed. There are many instances among other cater- pillars where most extraordinary resemblances are assumed, very probably protective in their nature. Indeed, in some of our own swallow-tails the mark- ings of the front part of the body may very likely serve to alarm a foe about to attack, as they are really of a very striking nature, especially when the creature assumes the attitude which it does when disturbed. We have, moreover, some caterpillars which possess features of a very surprising charac- ter, doubtless for the sake of protection; one of the commonest of which is the striking contrast between creamy white and black, or some other dark tint, which makes the creature resemble the vermiform dropping of a bird! This is true of all our species of Basilarchia, of the Green Comma (Polygonia faunus), and, especially in their middle stages, of several of the Papilioninae, such as the Green Clouded Swallow-tail (Euphoeades troilus) and the Giant Swallow-tail (Heraclides cresphon- tes). All these mimetic colors are of advantage only as against their vertebrate enemies. M’Lachlan has pointed out, what every observer must discover, 162 PROTECTIVE COLORING that they give the insect no exemption whatever from the attack of ichneumons, — a fact which is perfectly in accord with our knowledge of the physi- ology of insect-vision. But as regards their more highly organized enemies, it may indeed be doubted whether there is a single one of our butterfly cater- pillars which is not protected by means of its color, either to prevent its being seen or to render it conspicuous. Indeed, we are inclined to say with Drummond that “ mimicry is not an occasional or exceptional phenomenon, but an integral part of the economy of nature. It is not a chance relation between a few objects, but a system so widely authorized that probably the whole animal king- dom is more or less involved in it.” XVIII. AROMATIC BUTTERFLIES Fritz MUuer, a naturalist who has done much by his researches in various fields to bring new evidence in support of Darwin’s theory, as- tonished the entomological world some years ago with a long list of odors emitted by butterflies and moths. It had been known for a long time that certain butterflies had peculiar odors, but no one imagined the extent and variety of this peculiarity. And indeed this is not altogether strange, since the cases known up to the present time are largely drawn from tropical butterflies, and the odor is always lost after death, and in many cases is exceedingly faint and fleeting. The study of the apparatus through which the odors are emitted shows that three classes of organs are involved in their production, and the variation in intensity of odor in different creatures leads to the very reasonable belief that the identical organs found in an immense number of butterflies where 164 AROMATIC BUTTERFLIES we can perceive no odor are also scent-producers, even though their odors may be too ethereal for human senses. The odors produced by butterflies are very largely confined to the male sex, evidently for the delectation of their mates, and the organs through which they are produced may be divided into three classes: extensible glands, situated upon the abdomen; tufts or pencils of hairs, found upon various parts of the body, even including the legs and wings; and scales or scale-clusters, confined entirely to the wings. In the first class, that of extensible glands, we have the case of Anosia and its allies, the males of which can pro- trude from the terminal segment of the body a sac-like finger, bristling with hairs, which upon withdrawal are closely compacted into a pencil. The odor emitted by this organ is said by Fritz Miiller to be rather disagreeable when the pro- cesses are fully protruded, and as being rather faint in our species. I have never myself experi- mented with it. Similar organs are found in the allied Euploeinae, of some species of which de Nicéville says: “‘The males . . . may often be observed patrolling a small aerial “space, with the end of the abdomen curled under the body toward AROMATIC BUTTERFLIES 165 the thorax, and with the two beautiful yellow anal tufts of long hair distended to their fullest extent at right angles to the body.” So, too, in the Heliconinae similar organs exist, and that in both sexes, and the odor is described as of a disgusting nature. The females of Melete and Callidryas, genera of Pierinae, have similar organs in the female, possessing a peculiar odor, and the males of some species of Morphinae “are able to pro- trude from the end of the abdomen a pair of hemispherical bodies covered with short hairs 9 which produce a very distinct odor.” 5o, again, both sexes of a species of Didonis, one of the Nymphalinae, protrude from the dorsal side of the abdomen, between the fourth and fifth seg- ments, hemispherical protuberances which have a rather disagreeable and strong odor; and what is the more remarkable, in addition to this, the male of the same species has a second pair of similar protuberances, between the fifth and sixth segments, which are white and “emit an agreeable odor, comparable to that of heliotrope.”’ With the second group, where the odors have their origin in tufts or pencils of hairs, the odors at once change in general from a disagreeable to a pleasant nature. In the Ithomyini, Fritz Miul- 166 AROMATIC BUTTERFLIES ler found a pencil or tuft of long hairs near the front margin of the hind wings of the males which emits a distinct and agreeable vanilla-like odor. The same organs with the same odor are occasion- ally found in some of the females, but the organs are never so large nor the odor so strong. In Prepona, one of the Nymphalinae, there is a tuft of black hairs on the hind wings of the, males which possesses a distinct odor. The same odor of vanilla comes, according to Wood-Mason, from the scent-fans of a species of Thaumantis, a genus of Morphinae, where they are situated in various positions upon the upper surface of the hind wings near the base. Similar tufts of hairs on the wings of the males of a species of Catopsilia are said by the same writer to smell like jasmine; while Miiller reports that in some of the higher Hesperini he perceived a very faint odor issuing from certain pencils of hairs which are found on the hind tibiae of the males when they were ex- panding, the pencil being ordinarily hidden in a furrow on the ventral side of the body between the thorax and abdomen. So, too, he found in the males of a species of Melete, one of the Pi- erinae, already referred to, a pencil of hairs not retractile, protruding from the ventral side of the AROMATIC BUTTERFLIES 167 tip of the abdomen, which emits “a rather strong odor,” but whether agreeable or not he does not state. In addition to these, there are not a few instances known in which the statement regarding the source of the odor is somewhat vague, a gland being referred to when the only specification of such an organ is a collection of scales of peculiar character. On this account, and because in cer- tain instances the odor of such collections of scales is plainly due to the scales themselves and not to the pouch in which or the surface upon which they may occur, I prefer to class all these in- stances in the third group. This includes odors emitted by scales or clus- ters of scales. In all instances, so far as known, these are confined to the male sex, the scales themselves or the patches being similarly re- stricted. ‘Thus we find a species of Antirrhea, one of the Satyrinae, in which, according to Fritz Muller, the males emit a strong odor from a col- lection of scales on the hind wings at the anterior base of the upper surface, covered by the fore wings and specially protected by a curving mane of pale buff hairs. In a genus of Morphinae, Stichophthalma, Wood-Mason perceived a pleas- ant odor emitted by a patch of modified scales 168 AROMATIC BUTTERFLIES and an erectile whisp of hairs on the hind wings of the male. This, he says, comes from a fluid secreted by these scales or hairs, the only instance in which such a secretion has been noted; but this pleasant odor, he adds, is so faint “as barely to be perceptible in the presence of a much stronger odor (resembling that of sable fresh from the furrier’s shop) which is common to the two sexes,” but which is not localized. In the neighboring group of Brassolinae, spots of pe- culiar scales are very often present on the hind wings, and Muller observed that very distinct odors were emitted from these spots in several different genera, particularly in Dasyophthalma. So, too, he noted that a rather strong odor was given off from a species of Ageronia, one of the Nymphalinae, by two large brown spots situated between the wings where they oppose each other, though in other allied species of the same genus neither the odor nor the patch could be detected. A most curious instance is that of the species of Didonis, already mentioned, where abdominal glands occur in both sexes and even a second pair in the male, one with agreeable and one with disagreeable odor, a butterfly which is still further beperfumed, since Miller was able to detect a AROMATIC BUTTERFLIES 169 musk-like odor produced by a black spot of scales near the base of the under side of the front wings. Another member of the same sub-family, the European Charaxes, is said by Girard to have a strong odor of musk, especially just after its eclosion, though he does not state in which sex it arises, or from what point of the body it origi- nates. In our own fauna we have a striking in- stance of this odor in the scent emitted by the seales clustered along the median nervules of the upper surface of the fore wing in the Mountain Silver-spot (Argynnis atlantis), scales which have a distinct odor of sandalwood, so strong that it is hardly possible to handle living specimens without recognizing it, and which I have known to be retained for many weeks after death, when the insect had been inclosed at capture in a paper envelope. This is the more remarkable because I have never detected the same or any odor in the allied species of Argynnis of New England, which nevertheless possess precisely the same scales and in the same position. Finally, in this highest family of butterflies, we have the instance of the Monarch (Anosia plexippus); the scales found in the little pouch upon the upper surface of the hind wings next the lower median nervule emit 170 AROMATIC BUTTERFLIES a slightly honeyed odor over and above the carroty smell which all the scales possess. In the next family, the little discal spot of scales upon the upper surface of the fore wing of the males of a large number of Theclini is well known, but it has never been noted by any one except Fritz Muller that this patch of scales oc- casionally has an odor of greater or less distinct- ness. In the allied group of Lycaenini, the males of which possess scales of peculiar battledore form scattered over the upper surface of the wings, we find in one of our own species, the Spring Azure (Cyaniris pseudargiolus), an exceedingly delicate odor, which I can only describe as that of newly stirred earth in the spring or of crushed violet stems. Among the Pierinae, Miller mentions several instances of odoriferous scales, which in some instances are collected into patches and in others not. Thus in Leptalis he finds on the portions of the front and hind wings which conceal each other a patch of scales emitting an odor of greater or less strength according to the species; an odor, he remarks, which is ‘“ disagreeable to human noses.” So, too, in the males of several species of Calli- dryas, he discovered in the patch of scales in the AROMATIC BUTTERFLIES 171 same position on the hind wings a musk-like odor of varying degrees of strength according to the species. He adds that our own Cloudless Sulphur (Callidryas eubule) emits a faint musk-like odor, but this has been more carefully and indepen- dently determined by Miss Murtfeldt of Missouri as a slight violet odor; she was unable, however, to locate the spot from which the odor originated. Again, according to Miller, a “very delicious ? perfume” is produced on the upper side of the wing of the male of the species of Melete already referred to, a perfume which is rather faint, but which may be rendered distinct by keeping the animal alive with the wings closed, when the odor may be perceived on opening them. Another instance in which two closely allied species may vary in regard to their odor is found in our species of Pieris, the males of the Cabbage butter- fly (Pieris rapae) being only faintly odorous, while those of the Gray-veined White (P. olera- cea) have a more distinct but still faint odor of syringa blossoms; so, too, the Green-veined White (P. napi) of Europe is said by different writers, de Selys Longchamps, Perkins, Weismann, to have the odor of thyme, verbena, orange, or bal- sam. The only one of our Papilioninae in which 72 AROMATIC BUTTERFLIES there are any such scales peculiar to the male sex is Laertias, which has the inner margin of the hind wings reflected, concealing scales of a pecu- liar character; I have never taken a living male, and so have been unable to detect any odor there, but Edwards speaks of the butterfly as having a strong and disagreeable smell which probably originates here; for Muller has found in other allied swallow-tails odors which arise from exactly this source, the reflected margin being expanded, he says, when the wings are moved strongly in a forward direction, and allowing the odor to escape. Indeed, Miller asserts that in one spe- cies there appear to be “ two sets of males, emit- ting equally strong but quite different odors,” a case which would be very similar to that of dimor- phism in color or markings, — diosmism we might eall it. The odors which he discovered from the different patches of this sort were in some cases agreeable and in some disagreeable. According to Aurivillius, both male and female of Oeneis norna of Europe have a musky odor, and as he can discover no odor in either sex of the Large Cabbage White (Mancipium brassicae), a species in which the male possesses large andro- conia, he looks askant at the so-called scent scales AROMATIC BUTTERFLIES 1683 described by Fritz Muller. But if the species of Oeneis named possesses this odor in both sexes, it is probable that it does not arise from the scent scales but from some other source, probably from some abdominal excretory organ, such as Miller has described in many other butterflies. I have been unable to detect any odor in three other spe- cies of Oeneis examined alive by me, and they, like Mancipium brassicae, are merely some of many instances in which our senses cannot perceive an odor presumably emitted. lLelievre, again, found that both sexes of Thais polyxena had on eclosion, when handled, an odor similar to that of its food plant Aristolochia, the odor arising from a fluid which was left upon the hand that had seized the insect. The European Swallow-tail (Papilio ma- chaon) is also said to sometimes exhale a distinct odor of fennel, upon which the larva feeds. All these, however, are plainly means of defense, if they have any purpose, and have no relation to the odors of scent scales. Nor does it appear that any organs for their production have been noted. The statement by Miller that the fragrant odors emitted by butterflies are in some cases produced by peculiar scales found in the male sex, and which he terms scent scales, was received with a great 174 AROMATIC BUTTERFLIES deal of incredulity, and rightly, because the wing of an insect was looked upon, at least after the butterfly had flown awhile, as an almost com- pletely dead organ. But the fact that any one may experiment with our own butterflies, and in several cases prove to himself the exact location of an odor, removes in the first instance any possible doubt as to its origin; and Weismann, in defend- ing Muller, has clearly shown that there is a liy- ing tissue in. the wings of butterflies which would allow of the production of an odor through local active scent glands. It seems, therefore, to be clearly proved that very many butterflies emit odors either of an agreeable or of a disagreeable nature, and that those which are pleasing to us are in large measure confined to the male sex, and are emitted through microscopic canals which course through micro- scopic scales to microscopic glands at their base within the wing membranes. Now it is quite plain that, since these insects emit odors, they must also be able to perceive them. That this is the case has always been known to be true of moths, since the males of certain species, especially among the Bombycidae, will of an evening enter in great numbers an open room within which a female 7 AROMATIC BUTTERFLIES 175 of the same kind has been disclosed from its cocoon entirely out of sight of and often at a great dis- tance from her visitors. It is plain that in in- stances of this sort, known to every entomologist and too numerous to mention, the sense of smell must be the sole directing agent; and since in many of these instances no odor is perceptible to human sense, it is plain that there may be many odors emitted which, though imperceptible to us, may be all-sufficient for them. This abundantly explains the many cases of organs from which we can perceive no odor, when in allied insects identical organs are perceptibly fragrant. Moreover, we have in certain specific structures in the enlarged antennal club of butterflies what are plainly sense-organs supplied with nerve-end- ings; and inasmuch as there is no structure found in them which could subserve the purpose of hear- ing, or indeed of any other of the senses known to us excepting that of smell, it is the belief of physi- ologists that here are situated the organs of smell in butterflies. The under surface of the antennae of butterflies is invariably naked to a greater or less degree, and, more plainly in some joints than in others, little dimples can be readily seen. It is in these little pits that are situated the organs of 176 AROMATIC BUTTERFLIES smell; each consists of a sac-like cavity, the open- ing into which is often protected by cuticular pro- cesses, and at the bottom of which in the hypoderm is situated a fusiform body with a delicate conical ending extended free into the centre of the sac, its other extremity being in direct continuation of a nervous thread. For myself I am inclined to attribute to butter- flies, as to moths, an exceedingly delicate and high perception of odors. Any one observing their action with this in view will find numerous instances in which this sense certainly seems to come in play, particularly as it appears highly probable from re- cent researches that the sight of these creatures is far less distinct than was formerly supposed. The mere fact that the eggs of butterflies are invariably laid upon or in close proximity to the food plant of the caterpillar can be explained, as I have already suggested, only on the supposition that the crea- tures have the power of distinguishing such plants by their odors. If one will watch a butterfly bent upon laying eggs as it flits in and out among the herbage, he cannot fail to perceive the brief visit it makes to plants which seem quite closely to re- semble the food plant of the caterpillar, and how quickly it settles upon the desired object, as if it Qs \\ WIiI\ a RS SS \ NS WS \ . < -SCALES SCENT AROMATIC BUTTERFLIES 177 were recognized in an instant. More than this, how unerringly it discovers the plant it is in search of, even if hidden beneath a canopy of entangled obstacles. It acts in every way as if it were scent- ing out the object of its quest. 7 So, too, the very high development of scent scales of varied patterns and character among but- terflies indicates a direct sexual use, which is the more easily understood when we consider that the greater variety and brilliancy of the colors of but- terflies as contrasted with moths has, in all proba- bility, no sexual significance whatever. Brilliant masculine colors may possibly have arisen in birds through sexual selection, but such an origin is im- possible in butterflies; since, therefore, the males cannot be attractive to their mates by seductive colors, they resort to odors, and vie with each other in the production of sweet-smelling garments. XIX. THE PROCESSION OF THE SEASONS No one can observe butterflies in most casual way without having forced upon him the constant fluctuation of forms that greet his eye. At one time he will be struck by the abundance of kinds and of individuals; then by the small number he will meet, mostly of two or three sorts. One common kind he will fancy he has lost sight of, only to have crowds of them burst on him later in the season. He will look for the re-occurrence of others in vain. And each succeeding year he will note the same phenomena in the same order, varied only by the greater abundance or scarcity of one kind or another. This supplanting of one species by another is in wonderful adaptation to the parallel changes going on in the vegetable world, especially among the flowers. I do not know that any of our naturalists or artists have written of the harmony between the prevailing tints of a New England landscape at PROCESSION OF THE SEASONS 179 different times of the year, and of the insect world at the same seasons. Our common butterflies, which nature has been at such pains to adorn, show a shifting panorama of form and color from early spring to the time of frost. First in the sombre leafless woods come the various dusky wings, brown and black, skipping softly in and out among the gray rocks and over the dry leaves and dark pools of melting snow, or sunning themselves on dry sticks athwart the sun. Hard upon these, in the time of early violets and hepaticas and fre- quenting the spots most loved by them, follow the little blue butterflies, scarce larger than the flowers. Then, as spring fairly bursts upon us with its fresh and varied hues, come crowds of queenly swallow-tails, lustrous with metallic gleam, or striped and belted with gay colors; and the banded and spotted purples that court the quiet forest road and the brink of the mountain brook; the soft white butterflies, that look too pure for earth, less retiring than the last, float about our gardens, alas! on sad intent; while the brisk little tawny and black skippers everywhere bustle and whisk about. Summer, with its blaz- ing sun and diversified blossoms, brings us the hot-looking coppers, and all that dappled band of 180 PROCESSION OF THE SEASONS fritillaries and angle-wings, blocked in red and black above, and often variegated by odd dashes and spots of burnished silver, or by peacock eyes beneath. How they crowd about the spreading thistle blossoms, or on the many-flowered umbels of the milkweed, and fan themselves with content at their sweet lot! As autumn approaches and the leaves grow dull, the grain ripens in the meadow and the pastures parch with drought, then come the satyrs or meadow-browns, lazily dancing by the roadside and over the thickets which skirt the fields; in the time of goldenrods and yellow and blue asters the great throng of yellow and orange butterflies appear; some of them are with us throughout the season, companions of the buttercup, the dandelion, and the rudbeckia; but now they swarm, flitting busily in zigzag courses over upland pasture and lowland meadow, by marsh and brook, in field and fen, crowding around the open flowers, or dancing in pairs in mid-air. XX. THE WAYS OF BUTTERFLIES THE butterfly is a daughter of high noon and of the sun. Rainy days see none astir. i \ ie 1 i! 7 i. i er WORKS ON BUTTERFLIES By SAMUEL HUBBARD SCUDDER CAMBRIDGE, MASS. The Butterflies of the Eastern United States and Canada, with special reference to New England. Illustrated with 96 plates, maps, etc. 3 vols., royal 8vo, half levant, $75.00, mer. This work describes in detail all the butterflies known to occur in North America east of the Missis- sippl, excepting such as are found only in the unsettled parts of Canada or south of Kentucky and Virginia. It contains 96 plates (41 colored), containing about 2,000 figures of butterflies (17 pl.), eggs (6), cater- pillars (11), nests (2), chrysalids (3), parasites (2), structural details (33), maps and groups of maps to illustrate geographical distribution (19), and portraits (3). The text contains about 2,000 pages. Special attention is paid to the distribution, habits, and life- histories of our butterflies; and careful descriptions are given of every stage of life, not only for the spe- cies, but for the genera and higher groups wherever the data are attainable. Analytical tables applicable to every stage (a feature never before attempted in a work of this kind) are introduced wherever possible. Seventy-six essays scattered through the work discuss such special questions as arise in studying butterflies, and in themselves form a complete treatise on the life of these insects. Much light is thrown upon almost every point relating to but- terflies, and it is unquestionably the profoundest and most able work yet published on this section of the Lepidoptera. — DR. T. A. CHAPMAN, Extomologists’ Record, London. We wish to express our admiration not merely for the scholarly attainments brought to bear upon Mr. Scudder’s work and the 2 magnificent results achieved, but for the example of patient, con- scientious labor. This sumptuous book, so delightful to the eye through the extraordinary beauty of its illustrations, so rich in learning, and so agreeable in its excursions into the philosophic study of entomology, is a noble witness to a scientific purpose early conceived, developed amid many difficulties, and brought to a conclusion only after years of resolute toil and steadfast endurance. — Atlantic Monthly. C’est ici l’ceuvre de toute une vie, et d’une vie plein d’un labeur patient et attentif. Labeur non seulement de cabinet, mais labeur de naturaliste qui court la plaine et les bois, familier avec les mceurs des animaux, ardent a les poursuivre, a en élu- cider la biologie. . . . CZuvre superbe de typographie et de gravure, telle que la pouvaient exécuter les Americains, le tra- vail de M. Scudder est un monument d’érudition et de labeur personnel qui ne sera point égalé de longtemps. Ets’il se trouve quelquefois des écrivains pour faire aussi biens, il ne s’en ren- contrera point pour faire mieux. M.Scuddera eu le bonheur rare d’achever une ceuvre immense, qui durera, dont nulle biblio- theque de lépidoptérologue ne pourra se passer, et qui mérite la sincere admiration des naturalistes. Nous sommes heureux de pouvoir le dire hautement. — Revue sctentifigue, Paris. The history of Semidea, as related by Mr. Scudder, mostly from his personal observations, is worth the price of the whole work ; and I recommend every person interested in butterflies to make it a part of their library without delay. I differ with Mr. Scudder radically about many things, .. . but in other im- portant and essential points this work of his is and will forever remain unapproachable. The wealth of illustration is amazing, not only of the butterflies themselves, but of every part and organ of them, and what has never been attempted before ex- cept on a limited scale, the eggs and young larve are shown in greatly magnified and admirably executed figures. . . . For these matters and the anatomical details, worked out with wonderful ability, and the life histories and distribution worked out with exceeding care, the “ Butterflies of New England” will be a standard work, and no student can possibly get along without it. — W. H. EDWARDSs, Canadian Entomologist. Many important works on butterflies have been published lately, both in English and in German, but Mr. Scudder may fairly claim to have beaten the record. We do not hesitate to say that no work at all approaching the present in its compre- hensive and exhaustive character has ever been published on the butterflies of any country. — W. F. KirBy, Azowledge, London. Die Vollendung dieser neuesten und bedeutendsten Arbeit des hochverdienten Verfassers hat die entomologische Literatur mit einem Werke bereichert, welches nach gross- und einenar- tigem Plane angelegt und ausgefiihrt in Wahrheit einzig in seiner Art—%in guten Sinne —genannt werden darf. Es be- schrankt sich nicht darauf, eine Fauna in gewohnlichen Sinne zu sein, wenn es auch in dieser Beziehung den weitestgehenden 3 Anspriichen gerecht wird; es schildert von dieser faunistischen Basis ausgehend den Schmetterling im allgemeinen und be- sonderen, in Wort und Bild, nach allen irgendwie in Betracht kommenden Verhaltnissen . . . in so eingehender und umfas- sender Weise, wie sie sonst kaum in monographischen Arbeiten geboten wird, erweitert nach vielen Richtungen unsere Kennt- nisse und wird so zu einer ergiebigen Fundgrube fiir die Wis- senschaft vom Schmetterlinge und seinem Leben iiberhaupt. — Dr. A. SPEYER, Extomologische Nachrichten, Berlin. No work has ever appeared, in any branch of science, where such thorough and complete information is given of the objects discussed, nor which has been so copiously and accurately illus- trated. ... The illustrations are most profuse, superbly exe- cuted ; and each is accompanied by copious explanatory text. — JAMES FLETCHER, Canadian Entomologist. This is perhaps the most remarkable work on butterflies which has ever been published. . . . This most valuable work .. . will take a high place among biological monographs, and will rank ... as one of the most important, beautiful, and pains- taking books which America has ever produced. — H. J. ELWEs, LNVature, London. Marked by a breadth and minuteness of observation which are almost unrivaled. . . . The plates illustrating butterflies in color are marvels of accuracy as well as of gorgeous yet delicate hues. — Critic. Published by Houghton, Mifjiin & Co., 4 Fark St., Boston. 4 Frail Children of the Air: Excursions into the World of Butterflies. viii, 279 pp., 9 pl., 12mo, cloth, $1.50. These excursions are a small selection for the gen- eral reader of those published in a scattered form in the author’s larger work on the Butterflies of the Eastern United States. As far as possible they have been divested of technical detail and in many cases revised or extended. In their original form they were specially mentioned in some of the notices of the larger work, as follows : — These [essays] cannot fail to do much toward stimulating the study of entomology in a thoughtful and scholarly way. The student who has read them will cease to look upon butterflies as merely beautiful specimens, to be pinned and admired for their markings. Instead, he will find in these insects illustrations of many of the more interesting phenomena with which the natu- ralist has to deal. — Atlantic Monthly. Chacun de ces chapitres est d’un intérét puissant, grace a Vétendue des connaissances de l’auteur.— Revue scientifique, Paris. These [excursuses] discuss separately all the interesting prob- lems which arise in the study of butterflies (whether of dis- tribution, structure, history, or relation to the outer world), in themselves forming a complete treatise on the life of these in- sects. These will be a charming feature of the work. — JAMES FLETCHER, Canadian Entomologist. These incidental discussions . . . are written in an easy popu- lar style and will probably interest many readers who may not care to go deeply into .. . lengthy technical details. — W. F. Kirsy, Azxowledge, London. In eigenthiimlicher, weit tiber den Rahmen einer bloss fauni- stischen Arbeit hinausgehenden Weise hat der Verfasser in einer langen R>ihe (76) gesonderter . . . Aufsatze die mannigfachsten Themata allgemeineren Inhalts besprochen, die fiir das Studium des Schmetterlings von Bedeutung sind. Sie bilden zusammen- genommen in der That einer fast vollstandige Abhandlung tiber die gesammte Naturgeschichte dieser Thiere in mehr oder min- der vollstandiger, das Interesse des Lesers fesselnder und sein Nachdenken auregender Weise. — Dr. A. SPEYER, L7tomolo- gische Nachrichten, Berlin. Published by Houghton, Mifiin & Co., 4 Park St., Boston, 5 Butterflies: Their Structure, Changes, and Life-histories with special reference to American Forms; being an application of the “ Doctrine of Descent to the Study of Butterflies.” With an Ap- pendix of practical instructions. x, 322 pp., 12mo, 201 figures, cloth, $1.50. In this book we have a very successful attempt at a thorough study of the butterflies of a limited region, not only from the point of view of the structure of the winged insects, but also of their transformation; and the author does not stop here where many bocks on butterflies would naturally end, but in the light of modern biological science he leads the student to observe their habits, their seasonal changes and histories, their styles of coloration, the sexual differences in coloring and structure, and the probable reasons for such diversity. . . . In the preparation of these chapters, the author has evidently drawn very largely on knowledge acquired through his individual observations, pur- sued for a number of years. So far from being in any sense a compilation, it is a fresh and original treatment of a most in- teresting theme, replete with many facts heretofore unpublished and unknown to the scientific public. — American Naturalist. In his present work Mr. Scudder lets us into some of the secrets of Nature in the production of butterflies, and enables almost any one to follow, though still at some distance, the mysterious procedure. .. . Not only is it a useful compendium of what has been published in scientific periodicals by different students, but it abounds in original suggestions of great impor- tance. — Zhe Critic. This beautiful volume is not a systematic catalogue or de- scriptive list of the butterflies of any specified localities, but a careful and comprehensive treatise upon this particular form of insect life. The work is thoroughly well done. Clear and vivid impressions acquired by personal and enthusiastic research have enabled the author to write in a fresh and pictorial style, an ac- complishment which is rarely attained by writers who get their facts second hand. His vocabulary is less violently technical than is usual in works of genuine scientific worth. ... The illustrations are excellent, the reproductions being taken from the best American plates, while the new ones are vigorous and accurate. In the two hundred figures, fifty different species are shown as butterflies, while at least seventy species are pictured in some stage of growth, which is a large proportion, probably 6 nine tenths, of those which the ordinary student will find in a given locality. . . . Practical directions for constructing breed- ing-cages and other appliances to assist in rearing butterflies from the egg, as well as instructions for collecting, preparing, and preserving specimens in every stage of development for future comparison and study, are given in an appendix. The student will be materially aided, too, by a list of the plants on which the different species of American caterpillars feed.— /V. Y. Tribune. This fascinating book. ... An entire number of the “ Jour- nal of Science” would not suffice for the worthy exposition of its views. We can only hope that the specimens we have given will lead our readers to study it for themselves. — Fournal of Science, London. Published by Henry Holt & Co., 29 West 23d St., New York. 7 Brief Guide to the commoner Butterflies of the Northern United States and Canada. Being an Introduction to a Knowledge of their Life His- tories. xii, 206 pp., 12mo, cloth, $1.25. The author has selected for treatment the butter- flies, less than one hundred in number, which would be almost surely met with by an industrious collector in the course of a year’s or two years’ work in our Northern States east of the Great Plains, and in Canada. ‘To the descriptions of the different species, in their most obvious stages, with apparatus for iden- tifying them, has been added an account of some of the curious facts concerning their periodicity and their habits of life. A short introduction to the study of butterflies in general is prefixed to the body of the work, which is followed by a brief account of the principal literature of the subject. Those who know the thorough character of Dr. Scudder’s work will not be surprised to learn that even within the narrow limits laid down the book contains a far larger amount of gen- eral information than would be found in almost any popular European manual on a similar subject. — W. F. Kirby, /Vature, London. Mr. Scudder’s Brief Guide will, we believe, be the means of inducing many to take up the study of butterflies, who have been prevented from doing so for want of a suitable and accurate book. — Ottawa Naturalist. This little book, from the author of one of the best scientific books on Lepidoptera ever published for the general reader, is in itself quite unique and would form a good model for a similar little treatise on our own British butterflies. . . . The “ Intro- duction” consists of a series of short articles . .. written in popular form . . . their simplicity making them especially valu- able to less advanced students who are seeking for light. But to us the most important part of the work is the series of scien- tific classificatory tables. — EAxtomologists’ Record, London. There are few objects in nature which so soon thrust them- selves upon the notice of young people as flowers and insects, and of these none have been so useful as a first stepping stone or allurement to the realms of Natural History as butterflies. . . . There was not, however, until now, any work which could 8 be placed in the hands of boys or girls who had caught a com- mon butterfly, by means of which they could identify and find out something of the life history of their newly found treasure. This want Mr. Scudder has filled. . . . The introductory chap- ters upon some of the points which will present themselves to a beginner are excellent; concise, clearly expressed, and accurate. — Canadian Entomologist. A very convenient manual for the young collector and an in- telligent introduction to a delightful study. — AWantic Monthly. This . . . volume is of course mainly of interest to American readers, but from its method of treatment it will be useful to European students, and there is a common specific element, slight though it be, in the butterflies of the two continents. — Entomologists Monthly Magazine, London. Well adapted by its untechnical style and language for the perusal of the general reader. — Detroit Free Press. The butterfly is defined and its habits explained in simple, clear, and attractive language. ... The work is admirable in every way. — Hartford Courant. No one interested in the subject can be otherwise than well pleased with the extent and variety of information, the clearness of statement, the careful classification, and the helpful explana- tions and instructions for collecting, etc., which its enthusiastic author and compiler have provided for him. — 7oronto Week. Calculated to be very attractive to lovers of entomology. — Review of Reviews. Will be found most valuable. — Philadelphia Times. Published by Henry Holt & Co., 29 West 23d St., New York. g The Life of a Butterfly. A Chapter in Nat- ural History for the General Reader. 186 pp., 4 pl., 16mo, cloth, $1.00. I have tried to present in untechnical language the story of the life of one of our most conspicuous Amer- ican butterflies (Anosia plexippus). At the same time, by introducing into the account of its anatomy, de- velopment, distribution, enemies, and seasonal changes some comparisons with the more or less dissimilar structure and life of other butterflies, and particularly of our native forms, I have endeavored to give... a general account of the lives of the whole tribe. — LEixtract from Preface. This charming little volume is written in a style so untech- nical that the general reader, to whom it is addressed, will find no difficulty in understanding it, and will be both interested and instructed. To the British reader, even if he be a scientific entomologist, the book will be very welcome. ... The book may be recommended to all who cultivate a taste for philosoph- ical natural history. — Zhe Entomologist, London. This book should be a great service to the beginner, as it is very entertainingly and instructively written. — Zztomological JVews, Philadelphia. Mr. Scudder has written in untechnical language a charming little book, in which while recounting the life-history of the Milk-weed Butterfly, he compares it with other species and suc- ceeds in condensing into a remarkably short space an account of the most interesting features in the lives of the whole tribe of butterflies... . We recommend it heartily to all boys and girls of healthy mind, to naturalists, and thoughtful readers. — Ottawa Naturalist. He has taken the milk-weed butterfly and followed it through life, making each stage furnish a text for a liberal study, one may Say, of all butterfly life at that stage. It is a most enjoy- able little work, and gives a glimpse of what is possible in our natural history literature when precise knowledge is joined to a power of seeing and presenting relations of a single type. — Atlantic Monthly. We have, of course, an introduction and other chapters that would answer to almost any species; but the type taken as ex- pository is Anosia plexippus, and when treating more especially on this the author contrives to give, in a short chapter, an ac- count of its extraordinary migrations within the last half century. Io The chapter entitled “ A Lesson in Classification” may be read with interest. — Extomologists’ Monthly Magazine, London. Ought to be read by every boy and girl in America. —G. M. BROWN, Sczence Teacher in Oshkosh (Wis.) State Normal School. A fascinating account of its typical life from the egg to per- fected form. . . . Will furnish particularly fresh and interesting knowledge to most uninitiated readers. — Review of Reviews. To every boy or girl who turns its pages it will prove a verita- ble mine of delight and education. — Boston Traveler. Pleasingly free from technical terms, and so full of incident as to be of great interest. — Springfield Republican. Is a desideratum to the beginner who does not care to enter into the study scientifically. — Boston Advertiser. Extremely interesting. . . . Just the thing to be put into the hands of the young. — Hartford Courant. Describes the main events in the life of the milk-weed but- terfly clearly and at the same time comprehensively. — Zoronto Week. Of all branches of natural history there is none more attrac- tive and that can furnish more gratification to a young student than can be derived from the study of familiar butterflies... . Mr. Scudder’s little book will excite interest in the whole sub- ject and open his eyes to an undreamed of significance in these frail children of the air.— Philadelphia Times. Published by Henry Holt & Co., 29 West 23d St., New York. If Fossil Butterflies. Memoirs of the Amer- ican Association for the Advancement of Science. i. Ato, 10opp., 3 plates, paper, $2.00. Published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Salem, Mass. Historical Sketch of the Generic Names proposed for Butterflies: A contribution to Sys- tematic Nomenclature. 8vo, 203 pp., paper, $1.00. Sold by the Cambridge Entomological Club, Cam- bridge, Mass. IN PREPARATION. A Students’ Manual of the Butterflies of North America, north of Mexico. Prepared on a plan similar to that of Gray’s Man- ual of Botany, it will describe all the known species of North America, north of our southern boundary, and will treat the early stages, when known, in the same manner as the imago. A fragment of it was published in the Proceedings of the American Acad- emy of Arts and Sciences, vol. 27. It will be pre- ceded by an extended Introduction to the Study of Butterflies. ry A My ‘4 at) at he a BAe ak in - i} if ye { Ts) é e. aA Nhe tas ra hehe Nie EWE fi: a Mr Ponies, ; fae ne ste Ei LIBRARY OF CONGRESS ii